Loading...
HdL Sales Tax Report for CY2018 Q2 SalesSales Tax Update In Brief Top 25 producers In AlphAbetIcAl Order www.hdlcompanies.com | 888.861.0220 Q22018 Encinitas Encinitas’ receipts from April through June were 18.3% below the second sales period in 2017 though the decline was largely the result of the State’s transition to a new software and reporting system that caused a delay in processing thou- sands of payments statewide. Siz- able local allocations remain out- standing, particularly for service stations, casual dining eateries, building and construction suppliers, sporting goods and bike stores and other categories of general consum- er goods. Excluding reporting ab- errations, actuals sales were down 0.6%.Auto and transportation receipts were higher but reported growth was inflated by catch-up payments from last quarter. The allocations had been delayed by the same soft- ware issue that impacted this quar- ter’s results.Economic growth was relatively flat overall after adjusting for payment anomalies due primarily to low- er real casual dining and sporting good and bike store receipts that re- strained the overall rate of progress.Net of aberrations, taxable sales for all of San Diego County grew 0.9% over the comparable time pe- riod; the Southern California region was up 1.0%. City of Encinitas Third Quarter Receipts for Second Quarter Sales (April - June 2018) Published by HdL Companies in Fall 2018 Best Buy BevMo BMW of Encinitas Buy Buy Baby Cab West/Volvo Leasing Dick’s Sporting Goods Encinitas Ford Financial Services Vehicle Trust Herman Cook Volkswagen Home Depot Home Goods Kohls Lazy Acres Pacific Coast Grill Petco Ralphs Smart & Final Target TJ Maxx Trader Joes USA Gasoline Valero Verizon Wireless Vons Walmart Supercenter $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 SALES TAX BY MAJOR BUSINESS GROUP 2nd Quarter 2017 2nd Quarter 2018 General Consumer Goods Restaurants and Hotels Autos and Transportation County and State Pools Food and Drugs Building and Construction Business and Industry Fuel and Service Stations $12,636,481 $13,097,176 6,363 6,340 1,682,024 1,749,527 $10,948,094 $11,341,310 2017-182016-17 Point-of-Sale County Pool State Pool Gross Receipts REVENUE COMPARISON Four Quarters – Fiscal Year To Date (Q3 to Q2) NOTESSales Tax UpdateQ2 2018 City of Encinitas $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 SALES PER CAPITA Encinitas Q2 15 Q2 18 Q2 16 Q2 17 County California 25% Cons.Goods 19% Restaurants 19% Autos/Trans. 14% Pools 9% Food/Drug 8% Others6% Building Encinitas This QuarterREVENUE BY BUSINESS GROUP Q2 '18* Encinitas ENCINITAS TOP 15 BUSINESS TYPES Business Type Change Change Change County HdL State*In thousands of dollars 160.3%60.9%67.8% 151.8 Auto Lease — CONFIDENTIAL — -45.9%-23.2%-25.3% 102.5 Building Materials — CONFIDENTIAL — -19.1%-12.6%-9.6% 242.3 Casual Dining -5.3%-9.2%-4.4% 64.7 Convenience Stores/Liquor -30.0%-13.5%-12.0% 145.1 Discount Dept Stores — CONFIDENTIAL — -11.2%-5.1%-3.1% 98.1 Electronics/Appliance Stores -25.3%-27.2%-28.5% 65.2 Family Apparel 13.0%-3.3%-6.3% 91.0 Fast-Casual Restaurants -12.4%-7.0%-2.1% 135.3 Grocery Stores -9.4%-21.7%-20.2% 109.6 Home Furnishings 0.1%-1.9%-5.9% 260.6 New Motor Vehicle Dealers — CONFIDENTIAL — -13.0%-5.8%-5.2% 143.9 Quick-Service Restaurants -71.6%-26.4%-31.9% 89.1 Service Stations -3.8%-4.6%3.9% 66.5 Specialty Stores -62.8%-20.9%-22.3% 51.9 Sporting Goods/Bike Stores -12.2%-12.3%-20.2% -4.5% -18.3% 2,315.6 379.2 2,694.8 Total All Accounts County & State Pool Allocation Gross Receipts 4.9%5.5% -10.3%-10.1% California Overall Local Government cash receipts from April through June sales dropped 10.1% from the same quarter one year ago due to implementation issues with CDFTA’s new tax reporting software system. The results were further skewed by the State’s attempt to offset the resulting shortages by advancing tax revenues that it estimates will be generated next quarter. After reviewing unprocessed returns and approximating the full amounts of partial payments, HdL estimates that once all returns are properly processed and the data adjusted to reflect actual quarter receipts, statewide local sales and use tax revenues will be 1.6% higher than second quarter 2017. Sales of building and construction materials, jet fuel and online shop- ping appear to have been the primary drivers of statewide growth during the second quarter. Auto sales leveled off as previously anticipated, although receipts from auto leases continued to show substantial gains. Online fulfillment centers and value themed apparel stores were the primary gainers within the general consumer goods group. Business-industrial purchases were slightly lower than previous quarters with declines in new energy projects being a major factor. Regionally, the San Francisco Bay area and the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley areas outperformed the rest of the state. Tariff Policies and Sales Tax Tariffs are becoming a key element of the federal government’s international trade strategy with additional duties of 10% announced for the end of the third quarter, rising to 25% by the end of 2018. Despite the current debates, analysts be- lieve that the impact on prices and sales will be minimal through the remainder of 2018-19 as most major retailers have already imported their inventory for the holiday season and are attempting to rush spring inventories through customs ahead of the new 5% rates. Many man- ufacturers have managed to avoid rais- ing prices by absorbing the costs of the initial first round of tariffs on metals, machinery and components. On the down side, small retailers without the power to lock in prices may be placed at a competitive disadvantage and contrac- tors are beginning to require escalation clauses in contracts to cover potential cost increases on long range projects. The key concern for analysts project- ing 2019-20 tax revenues will be how the federal government refines its trade policies and the impact on sales and use tax revenues. Although higher prices generate more sales tax from individual purchases, they also potentially reduce the number of purchases, particularly in an environment where rising housing, education and health care costs compete for a significant portion of discretionary income. Proponents of rising tariffs argue that the rising strength of the U.S. dollar will offset the impact of tariff related price increases on consumers. Opponents worry that the stronger dollar and the announced $5.6 billion in retaliatory tariffs on California exports will neg- atively impact both the affected com- panies’ job base and capital investment in supplies, equipment and expansion opportunities.