18-140City of Encinitas
Stormwater Intake Form for All Developments
and Standard / Basic Project SWQMP
Project Identification
Project/Applicant Name: 1112 Eolus Avenue/ Ben Ryan
Permit/Application Number: 18 -xxx TPM/CDP
Date: 611412018
Site Address: 1112 Eolus Avenue
APN. 254- 391 -10
Scope of work /project description:
The proposed project includes the demolition of all existing onsite improvements and the construction of
two single - family residences along with new driveways, landscaping, and hardscape improvements. Site
grading along with road drainage, retaining wall, and utility improvements typical to residential
development will also be constructed.
Determination of Project Status and Requirements
This form will identify permanent, post construction BMP requirements. Refer to City of Encinitas
Stormwater BMP Design Manual for guidance.
Step 1: Is the project a "development project "?
X Yes
Go to Step 2.
Development projects are defined as
.'construction, rehabilitation, redevelopment, or
reconstruction of any public or private projects ".
Stop.
See Section 1.3 and Table 1 -2 of the manual for
Permanent BMP requirements do
guidance. For example, interior remodels, roof
❑ No
not apply. No SWAMP will be
replacements, and electrical and plumbing work
required. Provide discussion below.
are not development projects.
If "No ", provide discussion /justification explaining why the project is not a "development project ":
Step 2: Complete questions below for Project Type Determination.
The project is (select one): ❑ New Development N Redevelopment
The total proposed, newly created and /or replaced impervious area is: 9,973 ft
Is the project in any of the following categories, (a) through (f) below?
Yes
No
(a)
New development projects or redevelopment projects that create and /or replaced
10,000 square feet or more of impervious surfaces (collectively over the entire
❑
®
project site). This includes commercial, industrial, residential, mixed -use, and public
development projects.
Yes
No
(b)
Redevelopment projects that create and /or replace 5,000 square feet or more of
impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site on an existing site of
❑
10,000 square feet or more of impervious surfaces). This includes commercial,
industrial, residential, mixed -use, and public development projects.
Yes
No
(c)
New and redevelopment projects that create and /or replace 5,000 square feet or
more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site), and support
❑
X
one or more of the following uses:
(i) Restaurants. This category is defined as a facility that sells prepared foods
and drinks for consumption, including stationary lunch counters and
refreshment stands selling prepared foods and drinks for immediate
consumption (SIC code 5812).
Stormwater Intake Form for All Developments Page 2 of 5
and Standard / Basic Project SWQMP
(ii) Hillside development projects. This category includes development on any
natural slope that is twenty -five percent or greater.
(iii) Parking lots. This category is defined as a land area or facility for the
temporary parking or storage of motor vehicles used personally, for
business, or for commerce.
(iv) Streets, roads, highways, freeways, and driveways. This category is
defined as any paved impervious surface used for the transportation of
automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, and other vehicles.
Yes
No
(d)
New or redevelopment projects that create and /or replace 2,500 square feet or
❑
more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site), and discharge
directly to an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA). "Discharge directly to" includes
flow that is conveyed overland a distance of 200 feet or less from the project to the
ESA, or conveyed in a pipe or open channel any distance as an isolated flow from
the project to the ESA (i.e. not commingled with flows from adjacent lands).
Note: ESAs are areas that include but are not limited to all Clean Water Act
Section 303(d) impaired water bodies areas designated as Areas of Special
Biological Significance by the State Water Board and SDRWQCB7 State Water
Quality Protected Areas water bodies designated with the RARE beneficial
use by the State Water Board and SDRWQCB: and any other equivalent
environmentally sensitive areas which have been identified by the
Copermittees See manual Section 1.4.2 for additional guidance.
Yes
No
(e)
New development projects, or redevelopment projects that create and /or replace
❑
®
5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface, that support one or more of the
following uses:
(i) Automotive repair shops. This category is defined as a facility that is
categorized in any one of the following SIC codes: 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-
7534, or 7536 -7539.
(ii) Retail gasoline outlets. This category includes retail gasoline outlets that
meet the following criteria: (a) 5,000 square feet or more or (b) a projected
Average Daily Traffic of 100 or more vehicles per day.
Yes
No
(f)
New or redevelopment projects that result in the disturbance of one or more acres
❑
®
of land and are expected to generate pollutants post construction.
Note: See BMP manual for exclusions specific to this category.
Does the project meet the definition of one or more of the PDP categories (a) through (f) listed above?
❑ Yes — The project is a Priority Development Project, the applicant shall provide PDP Post
Construction BMPs and provide a PDP SWAMP. Stop here and complete PDP SWAMP.
® No — Does the project propose 500 SF or more of new and /or replaced impervious surface area?
X Yes — The project is a Standard Project, the applicant shall implement Structural Post
Construction BMPs, site design, and source control BMPs.
Complete Step 3, 4, 8 5.
❑ No — The project is a Basic Project, the applicant shall implement site design and
source control measures. Complete Step 3 8 4.
Stormwater Intake Form for All Developments Page 3 of 5
and Standard / Basic Project SWQMP
Step 3: Source Control BMP Checklist —All "Development Projects" Must Complete
All development projects must implement source control BMPs SC -1 through SC -6 where applicable and
feasible. See Chapter 4 and Appendix E of the manual for information to implement source control BMPs
shown in this checklist.
Answer each category below pursuant to the following.
"Yes" means the project will implement the source control BMP as described in Chapter 4 and /or
Appendix E of the manual. Discussion /justification is not required.
• "No" means the BMP is applicable to the project but it is not feasible to implement. Discussion /
justification must be provided.
"N /A" means the BMP is not applicable at the project site because the project does not include
the feature that is addressed by the BMP (e.g., the project has no outdoor materials storage
areas). Discussion / justification may be provided.
Source Control Requirement
Applied?.
SC -1 Prevention of Illicit Discharges into the storm drain
N Yes
5Z:7101
N/A
SC -2 Storm Drain Stenciling or Signage
❑ Yes
❑ No
x N/A
SC -3 Protect Outdoor Materials Storage Areas from Rainfall, Run -On,
Runoff, and Wind Dispersal
®Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
SC -4 Protect Materials Stored in Outdoor Work Areas from Rainfall,
Run -On, Runoff, and Wind Dispersal
Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
SC -5 Protect Trash Storage Areas from Rainfall, Run -On, Runoff, and
®Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Wind Dispersal
SC -6 Additional BMPs Based on-Potential Sources of Runoff
Pollutants (must answer for each source listed below)
❑ Onsite storm drain inlets
x Yes
o No
o N/A
o Interior floor drains and elevator shaft sump pumps drain to sewer
o Yes
o No
® N/A
E) Interior parking garages drain to sewer
o Yes
❑ No
N N/A
• Need for future indoor & structural pest control
o Yes
o No
9 N/A
• Landscape /outdoor pesticide use
z Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
❑ Pools, spas, ponds, decorative fountains, and other water features
o Yes
o No
x N/A
❑ Food service
o Yes
o No
m N/A
❑ Refuse/Trash areas must be covered
❑ Yes
❑ No
x N/A
• Industrial processes
o Yes
❑ No
N N/A
• Outdoor storage of equipment or materials must be covered
❑ Yes
o No
m N/A
• Vehicle and equipment cleaning
o Yes
❑ No
N N/A
• Vehicle /equipment repair and maintenance
❑ Yes
o No
N N/A
• Fuel dispensing areas
o Yes
❑ No
W N/A
❑ Loading docks
❑ Yes
❑ No
R N/A
o Fire sprinkler test water
❑ Yes
❑ No
x N/A
o Miscellaneous drain or wash water
❑ Yes
o No
N N/A
❑ Plazas, sidewalks, and parking lots
o Yes
I ❑ No
I X N/A
Discussion / justification if SC -1 through SC -6 not implemented. Justification must be provided for ALL
"No" answers shown above.
=_ Stormwater Intake Form for All Developments
g and Standard / Basic Project SWQMP
Page 4 of 5
Step 4: Site Design BMP Checklist — All "Development Projects" Must Complete
All development projects must implement site design BMPs SD -1 through SD -8 where applicable and
feasible. See Chapter 4 and Appendix E of the manual for information to implement site design BMPs
shown in this checklist.
Answer each category below pursuant to the following.
• "Yes" means the project will implement the site design BMP as described in Chapter 4 and /or
Appendix E of the manual. Discussion /justification is not required.
• "No" means the BMP is applicable to the project but it is not feasible to implement. Discussion /
justification must be provided.
• "N /A" means the BMP is not applicable at the project site because the project does not include
the feature that is addressed by the BMP (e.g., the project site has no existing natural areas to
conserve). Discussion / justification may be provided.
Source Control Requirement
A plied?
SD -1 Maintain Natural Drainage Pathways and Hydrologic Features
X Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
SD -2 Conserve Natural Areas, Soils, and Vegetation
X Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
SD -3 Minimize Impervious Area
N Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
SD -4 Minimize Soil Compaction
X) Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
SD -5 Impervious Area Dispersion - Directly Connected Impervious
W Yes
11 No
❑ N/A
Areas (e.g. roof downspouts connected to street are not allowed
SD -6 Runoff Collection
❑ Yes
❑ No
W N/A
SD -7 Landscaping with Native or Drought Tolerant Species
N Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
SD -8 Harvesting and Using Precipitation
W Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Discussion /justification if SD -1 through SD -8 not implemented. Justification must be provided for ALL
"No" answers shown above.
Step 5: Standard Project BMP Sizing for a500sf New /Replaced Impervious Surface Areas
Projects that create and /or remove and replace 500sf or greater of impervious surface collectively over
the entire project site shall provide natural biofiltration and /or bioretention BMPs. The applicant may use
the Design Capture Volume method (attach calculations hereon; see Appendix B of BMP Design
Manual), or may utilize the following calculation:
399 9,973 SF X 0.04
MINIMUM EFFECTIVE BMP AREA = 0.04 x Total new and /or removed and replaced impervious surfaces
Describe the selected Structural BMP Design including type, location, size, etc. below:
Two biofiltration basin have been selected and sized with enough surface area to comply with City of
Encinitas storm water standards for water quality and provide detention volume to mitigate peak runoff to
pre - developement conditions. BMP basin are to be placed to the west of each proposed parcel property
boundary.
Stormwater Intake Form for All Developments Page 5 of 5
and Standard / Basic Project SWOMP
Project Owner's Certification:
I hereby acknowledge that my project is subject to the stormwater quality regulations of the City of
Encinitas and certify that my project will provide satisfactory stormwater quality measures both during the
construction process and afterwards.
If my project is designated as a Priority or a Standard Project, I further acknowledge my understanding
that the permanent stormwater treatment features must remain in place, be inspected at least once
annually, and be maintained in good working order. Removal or modification of these features without
prior City authorization is prohibited.
I certify that I have reviewed the information contained in this form and verified that it is both complete
and correct.
Signature of Owner
Ben Ryan
Print Name
Agent's Certification:
Tourmaline Properties, Inc.
Company Name
I hereby certify that this project will be designed in conformance with the stormwater quality regulations of
the City of Encinitas.
I certify that I have reviewed the information contained in this form and verified that it is both complete
and correct.
�- 622-IS
ignature of Agent Date
Tyler G Lawson
Print Name
Engineer
Working Capacity of Agent (architect, engineer)
Pasco Laret Suite & Associates
Company Name
Place
No. 80356
EXP.----
Above
PLANNING APPLICATION
CITY OF ENCINITAS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
www.encinitasca.gov
505 South Vulcan Avenue Application No. 1 ? -1qL) TPtl ( i
Encinitas, California 92024 Date of Application: 6 7-6 I
(760) 633 -2710 or planning(aencinitasca.gov Community Area
*` Appointment Required Prior to Submittal "
PROJECT
Project Name:
Project Address:
Eolus Ave Residences
1112 Eolus Ave. Encinitas CA 92024
254 -391
Been: Leucadia Blvd And: E. Glaucus St.
(Street) (Street)
h1 PROPERTY OWNER' ❑ APPLICANT*
Name: Ben Ryan - Tourmaline Properties, Inc. Company Name: Tourmaline Properties, Inc.
Address:
2079 Garnet Ave.
City /State /ZIP: San D
Phone: 858 - 799 -1020
CA 92109
Fax:
Email: ben @tourmalineproperties.com
0 APPLICANT' (Business Owner) 13 AGENT ❑ REPRESENTATIVE
Name: Company Name:
City/State /ZIP:
Phone:
Fax:
)K ARCHITECT 0 ENGINEER I] DESIGNER
Name: Deborah Shewaga Company Name: Ideal Design Systems, Inc.
City/State /ZIP: ENCINITAS, CA 92024
Phone: 760- 560 -6773 Fax:
Email: deborah@sandiegoarchitects.com
CONTACT PERSON: O Property Owner / Applicant 0 Applicant / Agent / Representative 0Architect / Engineer / Designer
ATTACH A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE / PROJECT TO THIS APPLICATION
I acknowledge that an application for a tentative map or tentative parcel map is not deemed received pursuant to Government Code
65920 et seq. until environmental review is complete. All other application types are not deemed received until responses from
interested agencies are received by the City.
I understand that if the project or any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any of the Hazardous Waste and
Substances lists compiled by the Secretary for Environmental Protection pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then
a Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement must be submitted with this application. (Information that must be included in this
statement can be obtained from the Development Services Department.)
1 further understand that all fees and deposits submitted with this application will be refunded only as provided for by the
ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of the application submtttal.
U�- U! . 5/18/18
Signature, Owner or Authorized Agent (Attach letter of authorization) Date
Ben Ryan, President
Please Print or Type Signatory's Name and Title (if applicable)
'Property Owner is the applicant except in certain circumstance; please check with staff.
PBD \ \C: \l/semX inda \Deskhrp \Temp\Plaming Application.docx Updated: 2017 -12 -28
Application No.: 16 _ l y O
Application No.:
PLANNING APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT
CITY OF ENCINITAS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Design Review MUP/MIN
_XTM/TPM Variance Other.
1. Project Description. (Describe proposed project. Describe what you are requesting).
PROPOSED NEW TWO STORY SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING 4091 S.F. WITH ATTACHED TWO CAR GARAGE 443 S.F., COVERED ENTRY 48 S.F., COVERED PATIO 334 S.F.
a. building Sq. ft. HOUSE -W 4091 S.F. garage Sq.ft. HOUSE'B' 443 S.F.
b. exterior materiaUcolor SIDING AND BOARD AND BATTEN - COLORS TBD (POSSIBLY GREY AND WHITE TONES)
C. window material/color
d. door materiaUcolor
BLACK- MATERIAL TBD
TBD
e. roof material/color ASHPHALT SHINGLES AND METAL ROOFING - COLORS IN MEDIUM TO DARK GREY TONES
f. Landscaping Percentage LOT'S': 8035 S.F./ 15.490 S.F .= 52%
g. Standards:
DENSITY
CODE REQUIREMENTS
PROJECT
Density Range
Mid -Range
MAX. 3 UNITS PER ACRE
MID RANGE 2.5 UNITS
2 UNITS .69 ACRE
Net lot area
14500 S.F.
LOT'B' -15490 S.F.
Lot Width
80FEET
LOT'B' -100 FT.
Cul-de -sac lot width
N/A
Panhandle lot width
20 FEET
20 FT
Lot Depth
100 FEET
LOTS' 118.66 FT
Front Yard Setback
25 FEET
LOT'S' 25' -T
Interior Side Yard Setback
10 FEET
Exterior Side Yard Setback
N/A
Rear Yard Setback
25 FEET
LOT'B' 39' -7"
Lot Coverage
.35
LOT'B' .17
Building Height
22 FEET/ 26 FEET
LOT'B'21'- 6'/24' -10'
Off - Street Parking
3 SPACES
2INTERIOR SPACES. 1 EXTERIOR SPACE
FAR
N/A
PBDNT:L4PPLICATIONS AND FORMModginalslPlannng Application.doc Updated: 2015-09 -08
Application No
Community Area LEUCADIA State Coastal Zone?
Number of Proposed Residential Units: Attached _ Detached
Number of Lots 1 Acres: Gross15,490 S.F. Net LOT'B' -15490 S.F.
Related Case ?: ❑ Yes )I No If yes, provide previous Case No.
Are there any slopes of a 25% or greater gradient or bluffs on the site? ❑ Yes 9 No
IR Yes ❑ No
2. Existing Conditions. (Describe the existing conditions of the site: i.e., topography,
road /alley conditions, access, vegetation, structures, fencing, lot size, drainage and the like).
THE FXISTING LOT IS I ARGF AND RFCTANGIII AR I OCATFD ON THE WFST SIDF OF FOLIIS
THERE IS CURRENTLY AN OLDER ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOME WITH ATTACHED
GARAGE AND DETACHED SHED ON THE PROPERTY. THE LOT SLOPES /DRAINES FROM EAST
TO WEST WITH AVERAGE LOT SLOPE OF LESS THAN 10 %.. THE PROPERTY HAS NOT BEEN
MAINTAINED AND CONSTAINS SOME OVERGROWN LAWN, WEEDS AND A VARIETY OF FRUIT AND
OTHER TREES THAT ARE GENERALLY IN POOR HEATHLY DUE TO NEGLECT.
THE PROPERTY HAS SOME FORM OF FENCING ON ALL SIDES.
THE FENCE ON THE SOUTH SIDE IS A NEWER WOOD FENCE INSTALLED BY THE SINGLE FAMILY
DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS RECENTLY B I T THE FENCE TO THE T IS AN OLDER WOOD FENCE.
THE PROPERTY CONTAINS A NUMBER OF FENCES OR PORTIONS OF FENCES MADE OUT
VARYING MATERIALS THAT WILL BE REMOVED. THE FENCE TO THE NORTH IS A COMBINATION
METAL AND WOOD FENCE IN A STATE OF DISREPAIR. THE LOT AND PARKING IS ACCESSED
DIRECTLY OFF OF EOLUS VIA AN EXISTING PAVED DRIVEWAY. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY
ON SEPTIC, HOWEVER THERE IS SEWER CURRENTLY RUN TO THE MID POINT.
3. Surrounding Conditions. (Describe the surrounding conditions: i.e., existing structures
and relationship to project, # of units, lot sizes, vehicular access, topography, use type
and the like).
THE PRr)PFRTV Tr) THE R01 ITN IS A MMA/FR SIM(-.] F FAMII V r)P \ /FI OPWIFNT WITH A
CUL -DE -SAC AND 4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS A
SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON WHAT APPEARS TO RE A PANHANDLE LOT
TO THE NORTH EAST IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS
FROM EOLUS. ON THE NORTH WEST CORNER APPEARS TO BE VACANT LOT WITH ACCESS
FROM A PRIVATE ROAD OR EASEMENT TO THE NORTH. TO THE EAST IS A SINGLE FAMILY
HOME AND A VACANT LOT BOTH WITH DIRECT ACCESS FROM EOLUS.
ALL BOARDING PROPERTIES ARE ZONED R -3 RESIDENTIAL WITH R8 TWO BLOCKS
TO THE WEST. THE PROPERTIES ALL TEND TO SLOPE FROM EAST TO WEST WITH
1313MTAAPPLICATIONS AND FORMStonginals0anning Application.doc Updated: 2015-09-08
Application No.: /L A/0
General Plan Zoning Existing
Designation Designation Use
Subject Parcel: RESIDENTIAL 3
North:
RESIDENTIAL 3
South:
RESIDENTIAL 3
East:
RESIDENTIAL 3
West:
RESIDENTIAL 3
R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
4. Project/parcel history. (Describe any past actions taken on this site or project or any other actions
taken on development of the site.)
THIS PROPERTY CONTAINS AN EXISTING SFD WITH ATTACHED GARAGE
CONSTRUCTED IN 1962. NO OTHER PAST ACTIONS OR DEVELOPMENTS
THAT WE ARE AWARE OF HAVE TAKEN PLACE ON THIS SITE.
PBDUAAPPLICATIONS AND FORMS\odginalstPlanning Application.doc Updated: 2015 -09-08
Application No.: / 8 — / YU
*5. Project Design. (Describe the design of the project and how it relates to the subject property and
adjacent properties and uses).
THE PROJECT DESIGN PROPOSES
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH
ATTACHED GARAGE
THIS PROPOSAL REFLECTS THE SIZE, USE, SC;AEE7ND-=LOPMF-NT OF ALC-
THE ADJACENT DEVELOPED PARCELS.
*6. View Preservation. (Describe what views are being maintained on adjacent properties and those
that may be impacted by this project.)
THFRF APF NO APPARENT VIEWS FROM THIS PR PERTY TO THE nCEAN THE VIEW$
FROM THE SECOND STORY ARE ONLY OF NEIGHBORING SOUTH, NORTH AND WEST
PROPERTIES. WITH THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE DOWNWARD SLOPE OF EOLLIS
THE DEVELOPMENTS ON THE EAST SIDE OF EOLUS SIT MUCH HIGHER IN ELEVATION
AND THEREFOR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PARCEL SHOULD NOT AFFECT THEIR VIEWS.
IN ADDITION, THE PROJECT PROPOSES A MUCH LOWER LOT COVERAGE THAN IS ALLOWED
BY THE CURRENT ZONING. THIS PROVIDES A LARGE AREA OF BOTH LOTS THAT WILL NOT
NOTE: Items with an asterisk may not be appropriate for all applications. If you have questions
regarding applicability to your project, please discuss with Planning Department staff.
PBD WAAPPLICATIONS AND FORMSIodginaMPlanning Applicarion.doc Updated: 2015 -0&08
Application No.: — 14G6
CITY OF ENCINITAS D
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH
WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION, AND ALL
OTHER OFFICIAL BODIES.
The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
Tourmaline Properties, Inc.
List the names of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved.
Tourmaline Properties, Inc.
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning
more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
Ben Ryan
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a non -profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving
as director of the non -profit organization as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions,
Committees, and Council within the past twelve months? ❑ Yes X No If yes, please indicate person(s).
PERSON is defined as: "Any individual, fine, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization,
corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city, municipality, district or other
political subdivision, or any group or combination acting as a unit"
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.)
5/18/18
Signature of Applicant Date
Ben Ryan, President
Print or type name of
PBDU APPLICATIONS AND FORMSIoiiginals0anning Application.doc Updated: 2015-09-08
Application No.:
CITY OF ENCINITAS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING APPLICATION CHECKLIST
CASE NO: APPLICANT: APPLICATION TYPE:
This checklist is intended to assist you in preparing your application. The symbols in the right -hand column
correspond to various forms: Forms A, S, L, D and SW can be found in the attached application packet; Forms T,
CC, CP, U, V, SW -HMP, W, VF, DB, AE and AN are available separately when applicable. Items marked with a (✓)
below may not apply to your specific project and thus may be waived. We recommend that you meet with Planning
Division staff to discuss the application materials required for your project.
Recd
Needed
I N/A
Item
Form
❑
❑
❑
1. Application
A
_
j. Photometric Lighting Study
❑ _
2. Application Supplement
S
k. Other (specify: project aCl I orms )
13
3. Evidence of Legal Parcel
L
__❑
❑
❑
❑
4. Disclosure Statement
D
_
�M;7
❑
❑
5. Current Vesting Grant Deed
6. Preliminary Title Report with Current Owner Listed (✓)
❑__
❑
❑
❑
7. Project Plans: Ten (10) sets of the following plans FOLDED TO APPROX. 8 %" X 11"
❑
_�—
❑
❑
a. Tentative Maps (20 copies - see Tentative Map Supplement for required elements)
T
_
_
❑ _
b. Tentative Parcel Maps (10 copies - see Tentative Map Supplement for required elements)
T
❑
AC_
❑
li.
_❑
❑
c. Condominium Conversion (see Condominiu Conve n Silippleme for furtherrequirements)C
d. Site Plan / Preliminary Grading Plan" IF74p 0
_❑_
❑
x(
❑
e. Floor Plans"
®
,�r,
4lr�ri' _.
9
❑
f. Roof Plans"
CP
J_
❑__
❑
f. Priority Development Project Stormwater Quality Management Plan II
g. Elevations"
❑
❑
J g. Arborist Report - For Projects that May Impact City Street Trees
❑
❑
h. Landscape Plans and Supporting Documents " - Nn Is smP�,r��
j. Photometric Lighting Study
❑_
❑
k. Other (specify: project aCl I orms )
�rn�-
i. Slope Analysis (see Slope Analysis Requirements for required elements) , k
SA
_
❑
_ _
❑
__❑
❑
❑
j. Lighting Plan" za,
❑
❑
❑
__
❑
k. Sign Plan"
❑__
❑
❑
8.
Colored elevations of all elevations: one rolled, complete set ✓ "
_
❑
_
❑
❑
9.
Project materials/color board ✓ "
`^x \
_
10.
Color photos of entire site, structures, and adjoining properties (8 %" x 11 "max. )
❑
_❑_
❑
11.
Deposit/Fee as per the current fee schedule
®
,�r,
4lr�ri' _.
12.
Citizen Participation Plan (Proposal, letter, comment form, map; refer to handout & instructions)
CP
0____
❑ _
❑ _
13.
Use Permit Application Supplement (✓)
U
❑
❑
❑
14.
Variance Application Supplement ( ✓)
V
_
ja
❑
15.
Storm Intake Form - For Priority Development Projects see #17f ✓
_g_
13
16.
Letter of Authorization ✓
❑
_14R-
❑
❑
17.
Additional Technical Studies and Other Information s a plicable) (✓
❑
a. Geotechnical Study (3 copies) Ob 310 f
❑
❑
❑
b. Traffic Report (3 copies)
❑
__ 11
c. Wireless Facilities Supplemental Materials (3 copies + disc; see Supplement)
W
_
❑
o
o
d. Income Verification Form (one than needed per tenant for Condo Conversion)
VF
it
❑
❑
e. Drainage Studv (based on latest Countv of SD Hvdroloqv & Drainage Manual - 3 co„ ia&
❑
❑__
❑_
f. Priority Development Project Stormwater Quality Management Plan II
❑
❑
❑
J g. Arborist Report - For Projects that May Impact City Street Trees
❑
❑ _
❑
h. Fire Protection Plan (if applicable, 2 copies)
❑
❑
❑
i. Density Bonus Application Supplement DB
❑
❑
❑
j. Photometric Lighting Study
_
O
_ _
k. Other (specify: project aCl I orms )
❑ _
❑
18. For establishments proposing or modifying alcohol service: ( ✓)
❑
❑
❑
a. Alcohol Service Establishments - Existing( formodificationstoexistingestab lishments) AE
_
❑
❑
__
❑
b. Alcohol Service Establishments - New (for new establishments) AN
M -Low
E A 8 S i$ 8 T
South Coast Land Company of - -- in consideration of Ono Doll". and other value
received, &L. grant to the Ban Diego Consolidated Gas d Electrle Compaur, a oorporatioa,
_ organised under the laws of the State of California. the perpetual right and moement
to enter upon that certain real property situated In the County of San Diego, State of
California, d000ribad as follows, tomitt Lot Ten (40), Blank PRO, of South Case$ park
Ames, ae per map thereof No. 1958, filed 10 the Office of the Sentries of the said
County of Ban Diego, for the purpose of placing and maintaining thereon one anchor and
&Honor guy for Support of the electric power line lombed along the Masterly lim of
said Block -Ss.
- The -.:Si corporation is–to be rasp&cc Llle -tor wl. JNiey. _lca say be a&aaa4
by the construction, operation and aaintename of said anchorage upon said Is" for
which in law it would be liable.
TO HAVE AdD TO SOLD all such rights and easements unto the mid corporation,
Its successors and smigm for"".
IN WITNESS WH RROP - -have hereunto set -- -hand this 21 day of January 1926.
81+�Se6, Sealed and delivered In pr seems of--) 5OVTH COAS? LAND COHPANF
South by B. Y. Clawson Vice Pres.
Coast �, J. N. voigte ASet. BOGY.
Lend
C
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Calicmfforrnnie
se. Incorporated
COUNTY OF LOS ANGILE9, M. 26, 1906.
On "; is day of Jaay. in tha year ainet -en hundred = 26 before ,ae,
Wilbert Burkert, Notary Putllo in and for the said County of Los Angeles, State of
Oellfornia, roalding therein, duly noaaiselened and sworn, personally anpoared
S. M. Claumm, known to me to be the vice president, end J. S. voigm, known to M
to be the Amt Secretary of SOUTH COAST IUD COHP::IR the Corporation that almoted
the within instrument, known to me to be the persons wh, executed the within lntt. —mt
on behalf of the Corporation therein named, and oaknowledgod to me that mob Corporation
executed the man.
IB WI211288 WHERDOP, I be" hereunto net my hand nod affixed my offloial
seal the day affi year rn this certificate first abae wittm.
"�� "�. Wilbert Surkert
�%pilbot'E
i�Burkaitf; Notary public in and for Ion Angeles County,
1 lI,
State of California.
my Coamlawion Al[pLreo Dec. 32, 1928.
Recorded at request of Grantee Apr lb 1926 at 1 o`elcal' P. N.
SAM Pao 8.90
John R. Worry. County Recorder
ay B. C. Persons Deputy
""'4L
---- -- --00000000000000000000 - - - - - --
I
B
I
:g
I�
a
N.r. s, B h Pape 1 01 RetreMd BY: aO,ymA P"ad:4=18I:91 PM
Doc: CASAND:RDED 1161-00464
1112 'EO'LUS AVE. SITE PHOTOS
f.71
w
K'. .. s� 55yy•s5 e 41
It
°
°
iF• 8 .. � ua= p { 4 ° < °o° d
W a� o
a
49 ! y
Ij
d
r �
r 3 I 1
�l [�A� ;�
'- q � -Ni
� f:r.N x.. ..
i
t
.. .fit
�.
� �
•
i
..! .
..
.
_
� e
�
•`
�
2•�
. �
��a
j.�
��a
. Y �
'�
Y '.
..
r, _ S
r .
�
M,.., N� +.
.. �. I... �
' J.. l
..
f
'� �
�t � • - 7'ti
� -
'- q � -Ni
� f:r.N x.. ..
o
} w' � '_ _ f N.
-^ a , 1
°T.-: ^ "tom. W- . :+.y^- ....�- .......... '^' -,,•�, A �� � / �4 �q V .. ,, "{
rf-1 � I rl x[[ij1
pn
ME
.i6'c°
f!`",yj�
Y L
1p
1�
n r-
IN 6
' f„
oa
\ a
�d
5�
r 1 '
tea`s pkf�o„
Ir
3 }'YW
.{
'
"'1"
WL
X14 o 11
�` 15 All X�(
(A r i
e3
rvyz
i Ni It 1i
T 4} ,df [ t I I' 0V4fi
1 t�
O 1
I
n
I
1 1, 1 e
IF
qp
yr V,
r
!
Vol i
ji"IfC��
Poi
Q .r.
I
-zac y 1 ' •
a y
h t 3 !?
v
r
a
S Y
-a
t -
e 'f _
1�1_ \f
el
L
o �
rz
'm
e
Qe
: I` . a r, Un _
l I
t,
o
ty i i
QTC i�"
iy ,Qfq IyW� {�y 1
N yip.
� 1
IC
f.
rz
'm
e
Qe
: I` . a r, Un _
M1 an 4 ( i C
t1 Itt
vi
SIN
OV
1
to
x j r a M "/ •✓ �=� ��
.a as3+iv�1 ?i f t'" f
C
,s
� 7
ASA
x Rny
1 9 '1. t
♦ � 4.
_ r 3 �d
e
�
v {
Y6 t
I.
qp,
I.
,il, L•J L•11 IU
e. / ♦.Y 7
rr M sQi�'y ♦ i J '•.- � jL A'i
• �,•,'!. Y.�,• ♦fir �•^' ♦ Ka♦,� ti r� }^�'�j','�S�:i. !:V
♦�1 , �5 t 0 ♦ Yv � �i , ;Y.
f ♦xy �'e od � �,� "r1,
7 •♦ A A •
6 r`
i _ ♦ `pry`.
�• � � � �s•7 �' to • y .; :x wk� 1�i:a '� '
r J
YN M ■ i
�6hile .i Krry q>s) tt �. ♦ }re..S.. n ' �� ..'t^ ,"+r'!" � i c.
II0�1]i '
> M —
i � row a4tr� i '. \ „i 1 +�,t�,�.•�!dk,,�(+�4 ♦ -t.. / \w> d,'
Y
z
y� .. � r„ �;�'; ',gyp•, �'t �+�'�,
.... � `'`�__ �a f— jc..•w�,� '�.. is
+' r s f 4p sh_t,ti'"tk '"
zri
xi t x`tyd' c 4 i f$ n r R wM. F .kly r
, �.r° �F nw�-S 43 � I¢n,'•s � �,. �' it ,ry � a'°it �r ;`5 ry���„u ^M�
�+- t
#�.
IN
� �� *.S d t J�ua t" � b r�'�e "�'?;4� �.,y�"'��n f'�� zL �L: er!�I�''"' "�'"_'y'ly,`r -�• � � Ka 5 `. "'! p �ri•�'! %,�c tG
yta ' �{ :�C1t :." -...'1 �k` z"��s"f �1``� "w,•.+.d"i� �'�'' .�ri" , tf���X4z
�y � Al 'i Y� ` �$' �> 3 ♦ �/ b.''F`> s.
•` � r.. My i% , �� 5 T� � � M1.,,, i y " {`�x'^�. r� �` rp '� M1[�y t�(f� '"+rK!!''..♦ f� r � »�s �"F�j,,M'"u r a �,{.�S _ ." 4�i�. "�✓ix
�T}
� tt S' > t Y � fs,Y� . SiY •i '�,.'+.�"� t� �..�+�'�.� < x �. �-�: �'"> {i'° J � x y I
�4,7
f,._nr,`; 3zt.. ,.'�. ._'!a':�u:� .,. ?i= Sa�'r`�a ter., f������I�I����GY'_ bY�.�A_�_ "���� nyt �...�tim�a..�. ���� i"'�z•%�hc��N ",`ea., .!' L
f � .. ♦ O s Ift �f� �` ti �1 '+t
pa wP L� Iii '� I'e A ' .%„R e^T°'�'1t��99 oe fq �' � s ♦ ! qY� '� t' '�. a
a .�.: t a ✓ 1St �P' ij(P�iAt e�a3,7 1 tsW r�'£.yr r ��l sgrt iq fi <.jd Tyi f''+. .. q , ,.
J t f (N t F L
i I Yfi 1 i ,,1 R 1 1
ej
v i
�t� s i
yt
rA
1-la �
OE
i
WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET
Prepared by California Landscape Technologies
Steven Sherman, PLA #2887
Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) 42.6_ 1112 Eolua Lot B 6 -14-18
Hydrozone $ Plant Irrigation Irrigation ETAF Landscape ETAF x Area Estimated Total
/Planting Factor (PFI Mettrod° amewncv
(PFAE) Ares (Sq. *.) water Use
Descri '
Regular Landscape Areas ETwu r
1. Low Shrubs 0.3
Spray
0.75
0.40
267
106.80
2,814
0.0
0.0
-
0.0
'Non Irrigated areas not Totals 267 108 80 2,814
Included In talcs.
Special Landscape Areas
t
0
0
0
t
1
Totals
0
0
0
EMU Total
2,814
Maximum Allowed Water Allowance (MAWA)
3,166
'ffyrlrozone wFlanang DescHoven
E.g
1.) front lawn
2.) low water use plantings
3.) medium water use planting
°IrMI98M n Method `irrigation EfAderey
overhead stray 0.75 far gnayhoW
ordriP 0.81 for drip
*MA WA (Annual &Went AWwed) _ (Efo) ( 0.62) ( (ETAF x LA)
+ ((1 -ETAF) x SLA))
where 0.62 is a conversion factor that converts acre-
inches per acre per year to gallons per square foot per
year, LA is the total landscape area in square feet, SLA
Is the total special landscape area in square (eat,
and ETAF is .55 for residential areas and 0.45 for non -
residantlal areas.
ETAF Calculations
Regular Landscape Areas
Total ETAF x Area
(B)
106.80
Total Area
(A)
267
Average ETAF
B +A
AO
All Landscape Areas
°ETM (Annual Gallons Required)
Elox 0.82x ETAFXArets
where 0.62 is a conversion
factor that converts acre-
inches per acre per year to
gallons per square foot per
Average ETAF for Regular Landscape Areas must
be 0.65 or below for residential areas, and OAS or
below for non - residential areas.
Total ETAF x Area
(13+13)
106.60
Total Area
(A +C)
267
Sitewide ETAF
(B +p) + (A+C)
1 ,40
A copy of this form may be obtained from Department of Water Resources website:
http: /twww. water. ca. gov/ wateruseefficiencyAandscapeordinance/
Application No.: — Z YO
NET ACREAGE CALCULATIONS
GROSS ACRES
LESS: Dedication
Proposed
Private Streets
Significant Wetlands
Utility Easements
NET ACRES
SLOPE DENSITY RANGE CALCULATION
A. MAXIMUM RANGE:
SLOPE NET ACRES
0-25% .69
25-40% _ 2
40%+
�J11la0014 Eel M
SLOPE NET ACRES
0-25% 0.69
25-40% - 2
40%+
M
M
I
DENSITY DWELLING UNITS
X 3 D.U. = 2.07
x D.U. =
none
Total 2.07 D.U.'s
DENSITY DWELLING UNITS
X 2.5 = 1.725
x
none
Total 1.725 D.U.'s
+/- Ac.
+/ Ac.
+/- Ac.
+/- Ac.
+/- Ac.
+/- Ac.
+/- Ac.
PBMT:WPPLICATIONS AND FORMS\o'iginalsTianning Application.doc Updated: 201509-08
Applicant's Name
Mailing Address _
City San Diego
Application No.: �8 — /y0
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CITY OF ENCINITAS
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, California 92024
(760) 633 -2710
EVIDENCE OF LEGAL PARCEL
Tourmaline Properties, Inc.
2079 Garnet Ave
D
Telephone 858- 799 -1020
State CA
Zip 92109
You are required to supply documentation that this property constitutes a legal parcel before the City
can accept for filing any discretionary permits.
This form and associated evidence will be reviewed by the Development Services Department upon
submittal of your application. A request for a Certificate of Compliance must be filed concurrently
with or in advance of this application if the evidence presented is insufficient to determine this parcel
as being a legal lot or determination will require substantial time to research.
If determined that the property is not a legal lot, no permit or other approval may be granted until
corrective action has been completed.
Fees and deposits submitted with this application will be refunded only as provided for by the
ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of the request.
t — oU
254 Page 39j
v y!` ,— Ben Ryan, President
Signature of Applicant
(Please Print or Type Signatory's Name)
Parcel 254- 391 -10 -00
Date
5/18/18
PBD MMPPLICATIONS AND FORMSoriginalsViannmg Applica0wvdw Updated: 2015-09-08
-�� CITY OF ENCINITAS
PLANNING FEE WORKSHEET
FEES EFFECTIVE 01/0112018, RESOLUTION #2017-64 ADOPTED 09120/2017
APPLICATION NO: Ij" j-to If�APPLICANTNAME: Ne-n 9l0�n
FEE APPLICATION TYPE (check all that apply)
CHARGECODE
DATE
FEE
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FEE APPLICATION TYPE (check all that apply) CHARGE CODE FEE
Affordable Unit Policy
PZ ID
$990.00
Agriculture Permit
PZ AG
$250.00
Amendment Authorization by Council
PZ AM
$660.00
Annexation
PZ AN
$3,430.00
Appeals
PZ AL
$300.00
Boundary Adjustment /Certificate of Compliance
PZ BA
$1,040.00
Certificate of Compliance
PZ CC
$670.00
Coastal Development Permit
PZ CO
1,600.00
Conceptual Review — Administrative / Planning Commission
PZ CR
1,200.00
Design Review —Admin Level
PZ DA
$1,275.00
Design Review— Planning Commission ( <2500 sq ft)
PZ D1
$2,750.00
Design Review— Planning Commission (2501 -30k sq ft)
PZ D2
$3,600.00
Design Review — Planning Commission (>10k sq ft)
PZ D3
$4,800.00
Design Review Modifications — Admin
PZ DM
$880.00
Design Review Modifications — Planning Commission
PZ DP
$2,370.00
Major Use Permit
PZ MA
$6,000.00
Major Use Permit Modifications
PZ UA
$3,160.00
Minor Use Permit
PZ MI
$2,110.00
Minor Use Permit Modifications
PZ UI
$1,580.00
Misc Service Requests
PZ SR
$140.00
Planning Commission or City Council Interpretation
PZ IN
$1,000.00
Resolution Amendments
PZ RA
$1,320.00
Resubmittal Fee
PZ RF
Sign Program
PZ Si
$850.00
Sign Review
PZ SG
$420.00
Temporary Sign /Banner Permit
PZ SB
$95.00
Substantial Conformance Review
PZ SC
$33S.00
X
Tent Parcel Map Application or Modification (2-4 lots)
PZ TP
4,555.00
Parcel Map Waiver (Condo Conversion, etc.)
PZ MW
0
Final Parcel Map Check (2-4 lots)
PZ FP
$355.00
Tentative Subdivision Map
PZ TM
Tentative Map Modification
PZ MM
$10,110.00
Final Subdivision Map Check (5+ lots)
PZ FM
$520.00
Time Extensions
PZ XT
$1,015.00
Variance — Administrative
PZ V1
$1,580.00
Variance — Planning Commission
PZ VP
$3,810.00
Variance — Planning Commission /sfd
PZ VS
$1,865.00
Public Noticing Postage
PZ POST
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FEE APPLICATION TYPE (check all that apply) CHARGE CODE FEE
TOTAL: j� --
CASHIER USE ONLY !.�
RECEIPT: } r; ) — DD ` CHECK: DATE: b ZL/ I %> CASHIER: TOTAL PAID:
C: \Users \Linda \Desktop \Temp \Planning Fee Worksheet.doa
Environmental Review — Exemption
PZ EX
70.
Comprehensive Initial Study (in- house)
PZ IS
$5,055.00
Geotechnical Letter Report Review
PZ LT
$270.00
TOTAL: j� --
CASHIER USE ONLY !.�
RECEIPT: } r; ) — DD ` CHECK: DATE: b ZL/ I %> CASHIER: TOTAL PAID:
C: \Users \Linda \Desktop \Temp \Planning Fee Worksheet.doa
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I certify that the "Notice of Permit Application"
the site on b Z'711 ro
(date)
SIGNATURE:
PRINT NAME: Dm�-4w- FAI?�,`I -)
CASE NUMBER
LOCATION: 111L C- u)tti) 4\,A—
RETURN TO:
(Planner)
CITY OF ENCINITAS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Planning Division
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
(760) 633 -2710
Application No.:
_�C�o
has been posted at a conspicuous location on
DEPARTMENT
PBD \ \T:\APPLICATIONS AND FORMS \originals \Planning Application.doc Updated: 2015 -09 -08
r 1
CITY OF ENCINITAS
PLANNING FEE WORKSHEET
FEES EFFECTIVE 01/0112018, RESOLUTION #2017 -64 ADOPTED 09/20/2017
APPLICATION NO: /h —iyO APPLICANT NAMEtb 0.1-44 i..n1L 5�CPac,'K /N(-. DATE
FEE APPLICATION TYPE (check all that annivl
rueorc rnnr rrr
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FEE APPI IrATIMU TVDF lrFor4 III th. +x....1.,1 rueDCr rnnr
Affordable Unit Policy -
PZ ID
$990.00
Agriculture Permit
PZ AG
- $250.00
CASHIER: �
Amendment Authorization by Council
PZ AM
$660.00
Annexation
PZ AN
$3,430.00
Appeals -
PZ AL
$300.00
Boundary Adjustment /Certificate of Compliance
PZ BA
$1,040.00
Certificate of Compliance
PZ CC
$670.00
Coastal Development Permit
PZ CO
$1,600.00
Conceptual Review — Administrative /Planning Commission
PZCR
$1,200.00
Design Review — Admin Level
PZ DA
$1,275.00
Design Review — Planning Commission (<2500 sq ft)
PZ Dl
$2,750.00
Design Review— Planning Commission (2501 -10k sq ft)
PZ D2
$3,600.00
Design Review— Planning Commission (>10k sq ft)
PZ D3
$4,800.00
Design Review Modifications — Admin
PZ DM
$880.00
Design Review Modifications— Planning Commission
PZ DP
$2,370.00
Major Use Permit
PZ MA
$6,000.00
Major Use Permit Modifications
PZ -UA
$3,160.00
Minor Use Permit
PZ MI
$2,110.00
Minor Use Permit Modifications
PZ UI
$1,580.00
Misc Service Requests
PZ SR
$140.00
Planning Commission or City Council Interpretation
PZ IN
$1,000.00
Resolution Amendments
PZ RA
$1,320.00
Resubmittal Fee -
PZ RF
Sign Program
PZ SI
$850.00
Sign Review
PZ SG
$420.00
Temporary Sign /Banner Permit
PZ SB
$95.00
Substantial Conformance Review
PZ SC
$335.00
Tent Parcel Map Application or Modification (2 -4 lots)
PZ TP
$4,555.00
Parcel Map Waiver (Condo Conversion, etc.)
PZ MW
$ 00.00
Final Parcel Map Check (2 -4 lots)
PZ FP
$355.0
Tentative Subdivision Map
PZ TM
Tentative Map Modification
PZ MM
$10,110.00
Final Subdivision Map Check (5+ lots)
PZ FM
$520.00
Time Extensions
PZ XT
$1,015.00
Variance — Administrative
PZ V1
$1,580.00
Variance —P! anning Commission
PZ VP
$3,810.00
Variance — Panning Commission/ sfd
PZ VS
$1,865.00
Public Noticing Postage
PZ POST
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FEE APPI IrATIMU TVDF lrFor4 III th. +x....1.,1 rueDCr rnnr
TOTAL: SS.'
CASHIER USE ONLY
Environmental Review —Exemption
PZ EX
$70.00
- Comprehensive Initial Study (in- house)
PZ IS
$5,055.00
CASHIER: �
Geotechnical Letter Report Review
PZ LT
$270.00
TOTAL: SS.'
CASHIER USE ONLY
RECEIPT: 3r3[S — OV 7 n 7 CHECK:
11 2,5
DATE:
CASHIER: �
('
TOTAL PAID: 35s-
C\ User5\Linda \Desktop \Temp \Planning Fee Worksheet.docx
10/04/18
Dan Halverson
Associate Planner
Development Services Division
City of Encinitas
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, Ca 92024 -3633
Case No. 18 -140 TPM /CDP, 18 -141 CDP
1112 Eolus Ave (APN 254 -39- 110 -00)
Dear Mr. Halverson:
'r -
1
OCi 2 2 2016
As the owner for the subject cases noted above, we intend to submit a Grading Permit
Application and a Building Permit application for plan check review while the Substantial
Conformance determination for the Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) and Coastal
Development Permits (CDP) are being reviewed.
It is further understood that approval of the Demolition and possibly the Grading Permits
shall not be obtained until after the CDP's have been approved and the associated 15-
day appeal period has been completed. Furthermore, it is understood that the Building
Permits shall not be obtained until after the CDP's have been approved and the
associated 15-day appeal period has been completed and the Final Map has been
recorded.
We understand that during the TPM and CDP process additional changes may be
required and any amendments required to the Grading and Building Permit applications
as a result will be done at our cost.
Sincerely,
Ben Ryan
Tourmaline Properties, Inc.
ben @tourmalineKroperties.com
858.799.1020 (office)
858.431.6102 (mobile)
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
EQUITY TITLE -SAN DIEGO
AND EORDEDDMAILT�O:
I
TowmaiilgeR
-
2079 Garnet Avemse
San Diego, CA 92109
Order No.: SDI Bil
Escrow No.: EC•19618-0K
A.P.N.: 254- 39140 -00
DOC# 2018- 0194108
IM1101111M NEN111mi1
May 14, 2018 04:59 PM
OFFICIAL RECORDS
Ernest J. Dronenburg. Jr.,
SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER
FEES: $2,191.00 (SB2 Atkins: $0.00)
PCOR: YES
PAGES: 1
SPACE AlIC.t2'I'HIS L NE :S FUR REW;
GRANTDEED
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(S) DECLARE(S)
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS $ 2,187.00 CITY TRANSFER TAX IS $.00
[ X] computed on full value of property conveyed, or
[ ] computed on full value less value of hens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale.
[ ] unincorporated area [ ] City of Encinitas AND
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Steven Clayton Martin and Starr Marie Culver, as tenants In Common
hereby GRANT(S) to Tourmaline Properties Inc., a California Corporation
the following described real property In the County of San plego, State of Carrfoml�
The Southeast 100 feel Lot 10, Block E of South Coast Park Annex, In the County of San Encinitas �
Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1788, filed In the office of the So County
Recorder of San Diego County, March 29,1924.
All 1112 Eolus Avenue, Encinitas, CA 92024
Dated: March 19, 2018
X49
Steven 1Clla�aytonMartin a
Starr Marie Culver
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verities only the identity of the Individual who signed the
document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document
Crete ne r„, ,
CDUNTY OF D ( F (gyp )SS.
On
before
Public,
wno proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons) wh name(s Ware Subscribed to the within I strun
and acknowledged to me that he/sheAhey executed the same In hlsfier/their authorized ce a
signature(s) on the instrument the s ckyed, and that h his Instrument.
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s), acted, executed the inatn,menl
1 certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY nder the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct
WITNESS m and 'al
Signature
or Nola a SIORTEVANT
sa.1107U
Commission Expiration Date: (o / �•� di
91ilC
n a Aw, i 4 Nfl
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS: To the parties as shown above
i
j IBM "ela A", Endntn, G 6704 - Ph 7604664773
.Email: debenhtsandppoanheecb.cem Wehsib:- moo. nodiepaarchlYdsaom
�h, L�
June 7, 2018
To:
City of Encinitas
Planning and Building Department
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, California 92024
RE: Letter of Authorization to process the Administrative Application for
1112 Eolus Ave, Encinitas, CA 92024
I, the undersigned, hereby authorize Deborah Shewaga of Ideal Design Systems, Inc. to act on my
behalf in all manners relating to the administrative application for the City of Encinitas Planning
and Building Department in regards to my property at 1112 Eolus Ave, Encinitas, CA 92024
including signing of all documents relating to these matters. Any and all acts carried out by
Deborah Shewaga on my behalf shall have the same effect as acts of my own.
This authorization is valid until further written notice by me, Ben Ryan.
Sincerely,
Ben Ryan
Tourmaline Properties Inc.
Property Owner.
1112 Eolus Ave, Encinitas, CA 92024
Recording Requested By And )
When Recorded Mail To: )
/J )
)
City Clerk )
City of Encinitas )
505 S. Vulcan Avenue )
Encinitas, CA 92024 )
DOC# 2019 - 0137707
1 111111 VIII VIII VIII IIII 111111 VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII IIII
Apr 16, 2019 04:13 PM
OFFICIAL RECORDS
Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr.,
SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER
FEES S155.00 (SB2 Atkins: S75.00)
PAGES: 2°
SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE
COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY:
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
Assessor's Parcel No: Case No. 18 -140 TPM /CDP
254 - 391 -10 -00
A. Tourmaline Properties, Inc., a California Corporation, ( "OWNER" hereinafter)
is the owner of real property which is commonly known as 1112 Eolus Avenue ( "PROPERTY"
hereinafter) and which is described as follows:
The Southeast 100 Feet of Lot 10, Block E of South Coast Park Annex, in the County of San
Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1788, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, March 29, 1924
B. In consideration of the approval of Case No. 18 -140 TPM /CDP by the City of
Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY,
that if it proceeds with the project authorized by the foregoing permits, to comply with the terms
and conditions of the permits as follows:
SEE EXHIBIT "A ", DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT NO. DSD 2018 -03 DATED
JANUARY 22, 2019 WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the future owners, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and
assigns of the respective parties.
D. If either party is required to incur costs or expenses to enforce the provisions of
this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs and
expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party.
Page 1 of 1
San Diego County
I VIII II I VIII II II VIII
�� J'' `• '#
Transaction #: 3707806
VIII 111111111
IN
Receipt #: 2019162809
Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr.
Assessor /Recorder /County Clerk
1600 Pacific Highway Suite 260
Cashier Date: 04/16/2019
Print Date: 04/16/2019 4:14
pm
P. O. Box 121750, San Diego, CA 92112 -1750
Cashier Location: SM
Tel. (619) 237 -0502 Fax (619) 557 -4155
www.sdarcc.com
Payment Summary
Total Fees $184.00
Total Payments
$184.00
Balance:
$0.00'
Payment
CHECK PAYMENT
$184.00
I
Total Payments
$184.00
Recorded Items
OFFICIAL RECORD -1
Document #: 2019- 0137707 Date: 04/16/2019 4:13PM
Pages: 23
Fees: Recording
$80.00
Fees: S62 Atkins Fee
$75.00
Total Fees Due:
$155.00
OFFICIAL RECORD -2
Document #: 2019- 0137708 Date: 04/16/2019 4:13PM
Pages: 6
Fees: Recording
$29.00
Total Fees Due:
$29.00
Grand Total - All Documents:
$184.00
Page 1 of 1
i JrJe'�.
San Diego County
Transaction 3707806
I III II II I III VIII III 11111111111111
II
\•�,««,'
Receipt 2019162809
Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr.
Assessor /Recorder /County Clerk
1600 Pacific Highway Suite 260
Cashier Date: 04/16/2019
Print Date: 04/16/2019 4:14
pm
P. O. Box 121750, San Diego, CA 92112 -1750
Cashier Location: SM
Tel. (619) 237 -0502 Fax (619) 557 -4155
www.sdarcc.com
Payment Summary
Total Fees $184.00
Total Payments
$184.00
Balance:
$0.00
Payment
CHECK PAYMENT
$184.00
Total Payments
$184.00
Recorded Items
OFFICIAL RECORD -1
Document #: 2019 - 0137707 Date: 04/16/2019 4:13PM
Pages: 23
Fees: Recording
$80.00
Fees: S62 Atkins Fee
$75.00
Total Fees Due:
$155.00
OFFICIAL RECORD -2
Document #: 2019 - 0137708 Date: 04/16/2019 4:13PM
Pages: 6
Fees: Recording
$29.00
Total Fees Due:
$29.00
Grand Total - All Documents:
$184.00
Page 1 of 1
Recording Requested By And )
/ When Recorded Mail To: )
v 1 )
j
City Clerk )
City of Encinitas )
505 S. Vulcan Avenue )
Encinitas, CA 92024 )
W
DOC# 2019 - 0137707
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Apr 16, 2019 04:13 PM
OFFICIAL RECORDS
Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr.,
SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER
FEES: $155.00 (SB2 Atkins: $75.00)
PAGES: 23
SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE
COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY:
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
Assessor's Parcel No: Case No. 18 -140 TPM /CDP
254 - 391 -10 -00
A. Tourmaline Properties, Inc., a California Corporation, ( "OWNER" hereinafter)
is the owner of real property which is commonly known as 1112 Eolus Avenue ( "PROPERTY"
hereinafter) and which is described as follows:
The Southeast 100 Feet of Lot 10, Block E of South Coast Park Annex, in the County of San
Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1788, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, March 29, 1924
B. In consideration of the approval of Case No. 18 -140 TPM /CDP by the City of
Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY,
that if it proceeds with the project authorized by the foregoing permits, to comply with the terms
and conditions of the permits as follows:
SEE EXHIBIT "A ", DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT NO. DSD 2018 -03 DATED
JANUARY 22, 2019 WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the future owners, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and
assigns of the respective parties.
D. If either party is required to incur costs or expenses to enforce the provisions of
this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs and
expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party.
aF •
/Encinitas
DEVELOPMENT SER\9CES DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF DECISION
Development Services Department
Project Name:
Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
Request:
Demolish an existing single - family residence and associated
structures, subdivide one existing lot into two new legal lots,
and construct a new single - family residence on Parcel 1.
Discretionary Actions:
Tentative Parcel Map (TPM)
Coastal Development Permit (CDP)
CEQA Determination:
EXEMPT
DECISION:
APPROVED
Project Number:
18 -140 TPM /CDP
DSD Number:
2018 -03
Location:
1112 Eolus Avenue
Community:
Leucadia
APN:
254- 391 -10 -00
Applicant:
Tourmaline Properties, Inc. — Ben Ryan
Representative:
Deborah Shewaga, Ideal Design Systems
Project Planner:
Dan Halverson, Associate Planner,
al•, rac,r -c' =ncini.sca.acv
Decision Date:
January 22, 2019
Report Approval:
®Katie lnnes, Senior Planner
®Roy Sapa'u, City Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) and Coastal Development Permit
(CDP) to demolish an existing single- family residence, attached garage, and detached
accessory structure, and to subdivide an existing 29,992- square foot lot into two lots. The
applicant is also requesting to construct a new single- family residence on Parcel 1 in
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
compliance with the underlying Residential 3 (R -3) zone development standards. The new two
story single - family residence proposed on Parcel 1 totals approximately 4,049 square feet and
has an attached 469 - square foot garage. The existing single - family residence and all onsite
structures would be demolished prior to recordation of the final parcel map.
Vehicular access for Lots 1 and 2 is provided from Eolus street. Access to the rear lot (Lot 2)
would be provided via a 20 -foot wide panhandle, which abuts the northern portion of Parcel 1.
PROJECT ANALYSIS
Background
The County of San Diego Residential Building Record demonstrated that the existing home on
the property was constructed around 1960 (prior to the City of Encinitas incorporation). A
building permit for a reroof was issued in 1998. No other permits were issued on the property.
Development is proposed for Lot 2 under a separate discretionary permit_ application (18 -141
CDP).
Project Site Characteristics:
General Plan
Residential 3
R -3)
Specific Plan
None
Residential 3/R -3
Zoning District
Residential
R -3
Zoning Overlay
Special Study,
Scenic/Visual Corridor, Coastal Zone
Community Character Context
Inland Residential-G ridded
Other Key City Plan
None
West
Notable State or Regional Plan and Law
None
Single-family residence
The project site is developed with a single - family residence and is located within the community
of Leucadia in the Residential 3 (R -3) zone and Residential 3 (R -3) General Plan Land Use
Designation. The project site is also located within the Scenic/Visual Corridor Zone and the
Coastal Zone. The project site is slopes down from east to west and has direct access to Eolus
Street. Public improvements and utility services are available to serve the site.
Adjacent Area:
Direction
General Plan and
Zoning District
Community Character
Context
Land Use
North
Residential 3/R -3
Inland Res idential - Gridded
Single- family residence
South
Residential 3/R -3
Inland Residential - Gridded
Single- family residence
East
Residential 3/R -3
Inland Residential-G ridded
Single- family residence
West
I Residential 3/R -3
Inland Residential - Gridded
Single-family residence
The area surrounding the project site is previously developed and is located within the Inland -
Residential Gridded community character context that exists throughout Leucadia. The
residential vicinity was developed primarily in the 1960s and 70s with the exception of the
adjacent lot to the south, which was developed recently with single - family residences. The area
2 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
surrounding the property includes single - family residential structures having a mix of
architectural styles, ages, and one or two stories.
General Plan Consistency
The City of Encinitas General Plan includes a number of goals and policies that guide
development and land use within the City. A discussion of how the project is consistent with
applicable General Plan policies is summarized below:
General Plan Goal or Policy
Explanation of Project Conformance
LAND USE ELEMENT:
Complies?
Residential 3 Land Use Designation:
The proposed two -lot subdivision is consistent with
Residential land uses in this category will
the Residential 3 (R -3) General Plan Land Use
be single - family detached units
designation. The subdivision complies with the
constructed at lower densities. This land
allowable density, and all of the newly created lots
use designation permits the construction
exceed the minimum net lot area of 14,500 square
of one dwelling unit with a minimum lot
feet. Additionally, the two resulting lots comply with
size of 14,500 square feet.
the minimum lot dimensions and minimum net lot
15,490 SF
sizes for the R -3 zone.
Policy 1.12: The residential character of
The proposed project will create lots for single -
the City shall be substantially single-
family residences consistent with this policy. Each
family detached housing.
lot will be developed with a single - family residence
1 dwelling unit
with Parcel 1 being developed as a part of this
3.0 dwelling units /net acre
permit and Parcel 2 under case 18 -141 CDP. The
proposed project will contribute to the City's existing
Minimum Lot Width: 80 feet
single - family character.
Policy 2.10: Development shall not be
All services are available, or are conditioned to be
allowed prematurely, in that access,
available, as part of this project.
utilities, and services shall be available
Yes ® No ❑
prior to allowing the development.
Municipal Code Analysis
Below is a table summarizing how the proposed project meets the applicable zoning standards
for the R -3 Zone:
Development Standard
Parcel 1 (East) —
Parcel 2 (West) —
Complies?
Proposed single-
Proposed single-
family residence.
family residence.
18 -141 CDP)
Minimum Net Lot Area:
14,501 SF
15,490 SF
Yes ® No ❑
14,500 square feet SF
0.332 acre
0.355 acre
Allowable Density:
1 dwelling unit
1 dwelling unit
Yes ® No ❑
3.0 dwelling units /net acre
Minimum Lot Width: 80 feet
80 feet
100 feet
Yes ® No ❑
Minimum Lot Depth: 100
181.3 feet
118 feet
Yes ® No ❑
feet
3 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
Front Yard Se_ tback - 25 feet
35 feet 10 inches
See Case
No. 18 -141
Yes ®
No ❑
CDP
Interior Side Yard Setback -
16 feet 7 inches
See Case
No. 18 -141
Yes ®
No ❑
10 feet
CDP
Street Side Yard Setback -
10 feet 2 inches
See Case
No. 18 -141
Yes
_X NO El
10 feet
CDP
Rear Yard Setback — 25
86 feet 2 inches to the
See Case
No. 18 -141
Yes
_Z No ❑
feet
residence
CDP
Lot Coverage — 35 percent
2,810/ 14,501 19.3
See Case
No. 18 -141
Yes ®
No ❑
percent
CDP
Building Height — two
26 feet
See Case
No. 18 -141
Yes ®
No ❑
stories and a maximum of
CDP
22 feet to the top of the flat
roof /26 feet to the top of the
pitched roof
Parking- Single- family
Two enclosed parking
See Case
No. 18 -141
Yes ®
No ❑
residence >2,500 square
spaces are provided in
CDP
feet:
the garage and one
Two enclosed spaces within
within the driveway.
a garage, plus one
additional enclosed or
unenclosed space
The proposed project includes a two -lot subdivision, the demolition of all existing structures on
the site, and the construction of a new single - family residence on Parcel 1 (of the newly created
two -lot subdivision). (The construction of a second single - family residence is also proposed on
Parcel 2 as a separate discretionary permit Case No. 18 -141 CDP). A discussion of how the
proposed subdivision and single - family residence complies with the Municipal Code and Local
Coastal Program requirements is summarized in the sections below.
The applicant has documented on the project plans that the average lot slope is less than 10
percent, and therefore, the homes within the project are subject to the 22- foot/26 -foot height
limitation to the top of the finished roof above the building wall (22 -feet maximum) and peak of a
roof pitched at 3:12 or greater (26 -feet maximum). The project complies with all applicable
policies of the General Plan, Local Coastal Program, and provisions of the Municipal Code.
Tentative Parcel Map
Pursuant to EMC Section 24.60.010, a Tentative Parcel Map is required to create four or fewer
residential lots. The project proposes to subdivide an approximately 0.688 -net acre (29,992 SF)
lot into two residential lots. The proposed resulting lots meet the minimum net lot size, minimum
lot depth and minimum lot width requirements for the R -3 zone as demonstrated in the table
above. In addition, it has been determined that all utilities and services, including water, fire, and
schools are available to serve the site. All necessary public facilities and services are in place,
or can be extended, to serve the project. The applicant has submitted letters of facility
availability from fire, sewer, water and school service providers indicating that existing facilities
are available to service the proposed project.
4 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
Allowable Density
The R -3 zoning designation allows for a maximum density of 3.0 dwelling units per net acre.
Density is calculated based upon the project's slope adjusted net acreage as per EMC Section
30.16.010.13.2. The slope, adjusted net acreage for the site is 0.688 acre (29,992 SF). The
project proposes to create two legal lots consistent with the allowable density for the R -3 zone.
Slope adjusted net acreage density calculation is as follows:
Slope Gradient
Square Feet
Net Acres
R -3 Density
Dwelling Units
0 < 25 percent
29,681
0.681
3 DU /acre
2.049
25 < 40 percent
122.5
0.003/2
3 DU /acre
0.0045
40 percent <
188.5
0.004
3 DU /acre
0.0
Total
0.688 acre
-
2.0535
Therefore, the proposed two dwelling units (rounded down from 2.0535 units) comply with the
density requirements of the Municipal Code and General Plan.
Coastal Development Permit
The proposed project includes a two -lot subdivision, the demolition of all existing structures on
the site, and the construction of a new single - family residence on Parcel 1 (of the newly created
two -lot subdivision).The proposed project is consistent with the policies of the City's certified
Local Coastal Program, and all- applicable goals and policies of the General Plan. The project is
consistent with all R -3 zoning development standards including setbacks, lot coverage, parking,
and building height requirements.
Scenic/Visual Corridor Overlay Zone
The project site is located within the ScenicNisual Corridor Overlay Zone due to its location
adjacent to a scenic highway view corridor (Interstate -5). When development occurs on any
property within the ScenicNisual Corridor Overlay Zone, consideration is given to the project's
bulk, massing, height, architectural design, grading and other visual factors that may have a
visual impact.
The proposed project design minimizes the bulk and mass of the building through the use of
pitched roofs, varying vertical and horizontal projections, and recesses in the wall planes.
Furthermore, the height of the building is less than the maximum allowable height of 26 feet,
and the lot coverage of 17 percent is less than the maximum allowable 35 percent in the R -3
zone. The project design is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood and contributes to the
aesthetic appeal of the scenic highway visual corridor.
Single- Family Residence /Design Review Exemption
Pursuant to Section 23.08.030137 of the Municipal Code, the applicant is proposing the
residence on Parcel 1 as a custom single - family home with a dissimilar building footprint,
orientation, elevations, and architectural features from surrounding residential units. Further, the
residence is differentiated by utilizing a variety of architectural styles, rooflines, materials,
5 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
architectural elements with a variety of colors, and materials. Therefore, the design of this home
is exempt from Design Review pursuant to Section 23.08.030137 of the municipal code.
Local Coastal Program Consistency
The project site is located in the Coastal Zone and requires approval of a Coastal Development
Permit. Adherence to the development standards of the R -3 Zone, including setbacks, lot
coverage, building height and parking, provided in the Encinitas Municipal Code, and the goals
and policies of the General Plan ensure consistency with the City's adopted Local Coastal
Program.
The project complies with all applicable policies of the General Plan, Local Coastal Program,
applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, and with all applicable development standards of
the underlying R -3 zone including minimum lot size, minimum lot dimensions, allowable density,
setbacks, lot coverage, building height, and parking. The proposed project complies with all
applicable development standards for the R -3 zone and is consistent with applicable goals and
policies of the General Plan; therefore, the project is consistent with the Local Coastal Program.
Additionally, the proposed single - family home will be required to comply with all applicable
Building and Fire codes through the standard building permit plan checking process.
PUBLIC NOTICE AND PARTICIPATION
Citizen Participation Program
The applicant submitted a Citizen's Participation Program (CPP) in accordance with EMC
Section 23.06. All owners and tenants were notified of the CPP meeting and the proposed
project. The neighborhood meeting was held on Saturday July 28, 2018, at 10 a.m. at the
project site. According to the CPP Final Report, 15 neighbors attended the meeting and asked
about the style of the home, sewer connections, setbacks from property lines, access to the lots,
window locations, landscaping, construction and grading concerns, views from adjacent
properties, and mailbox locations. The applicant addressed concerns and staff received no
other comments.
Public Notice
The Notice of Pending Action on the Tentative Parcel Map and Coastal Development Permit
was mailed on December 27, 2018 to all property owners and occupants within 500 feet of the
project site and to anyone who requested'such notice in writing in compliance with Encinitas
Municipal Code Sections 30.01.070 and 30.80.080, as applicable. Additionally, as a courtesy,
the notice was posted at City Hall and on the Development Services Department's Internet site
under "Public Notices" and via e- Project Source.
Administrative Hearing
An Administrative Hearing was held pursuant to EMC Section 30.08.080 for consideration of the
Tentative Parcel Map and Coastal Development Permit request on Tuesday, January 8, 2019,
at 5 p.m. in the Council Chambers. One speaker slip was received and the speaker had
concerns over the demolition of the existing, residence and the proximity to his residence. The
applicant's representative responded to the concerns. No other concerns were received prior to
the close of the Administrative Public Hearing.
6of19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
The project is a two -lot subdivision with the construction of a single - family residence. The
project has been determined to be exempt from environmental review pursuant to California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15301(1)(4), 15315, and 15303(a).
1. Section 15301(1)(4) exempts the demolition of accessory structures.
2. Section 15303(a) exempts the construction of a single - family residence.
3. Section 15315 exempts the division of property in urbanized areas zoned for residential
uses, when: 1) the subdivision is creating four or fewer parcels; 2) the division is in
conformance with the General Plan and zoning; 3) no variances or exceptions are
required; 4) all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are
available; 5) the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the
previous 2 years; and 6) the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20
percent. The project meets this exemption since the property is residentially zoned, is in
conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are needed,
all services and utilities are available to serve the site, the parcel was not involved in a
division of a larger parcel within two years, and the average lot slope is less than 20
percent.
The project meets the criteria of the guidelines sections. No historic resources are affected by
the demolition work and construction proposed with the project. None of the exceptions in
Section 15300.2 exists.
DISCUSSION
As conditioned, the proposed project meets all applicable zoning requirements as outlined in the
Encinitas Municipal Code for projects located in the R -3 zone. Both the proposed subdivision
and construction of a new single - family home on Parcel 1 are compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood in regards to the lot size, setbacks, lot coverage, building height, and surrounding
land uses.
FINDINGS
Based on the findings for a Tentative Parcel Map as per Section 66474 of the California
Government Code and the aforementioned analysis, the Development Services
Department has made the following findings to support the approval, with conditions:
Findings for Tentative Map
Explanation of Finding
a.. That the proposed map is not consistent
The proposed subdivision is consistent with all
with applicable general and specific plans
goals and policies of the General Plan. The
as specified in Section 65451 of the
project site is not located within a specific plan
Subdivision Map Act.
and meets the applicable R -3 zoning
standards for the minimum net lot area,
minimum lot width, minimum lot depth and
allowable density.
b. That the design or improvement of the
The proposed two -lot subdivision is consistent
proposed subdivision is not consistent with
'with the Residential 3 (R -3) General Plan Land
applicable general and specific plans.
Use designation. The subdivision complies
7 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
Findings for Tentative Map
Explanation of Finding
with the allowable density, and both of the
newly created lots exceed the minimum net lot
area of 14,500 square feet. Additionally, the
two resulting lots comply with the minimum lot
dimensions for the R -3 zone. As conditioned,
the project design and improvements are
consistent with the General Plan. The project
is not within a specific plan area.
c. That the site is not physically suitable for
The project site is physically suitable for the
the proposed type of development.
proposed type of development. The project
proposes to subdivide one existing lot into two
lots. The proposed subdivision is consistent
with the R -3 zoning standards for minimum lot
area, minimum lot depth and minimum lot
width. Additionally, all necessary public
facilities and services are in place, or can be
extended, to serve the project.
d. That the site is not physically suitable for
The applicant proposes to subdivide one
the proposed density of development.
existing lot into two new legal parcels. The R -3
zoning designation allows for a maximum
density of 3.0 dwelling units per net acre. The
subdivision of the subject property would
create two legal lots consistent with the
allowable density for the R -3 zone.
Additionally, the two new lots would meet the
minimum net lot size requirements and the
minimum lot dimension requirements for the
R -3 zone.
e. That the design of the subdivision or the
The proposed subdivision is located in an
proposed improvements are likely to cause
urbanized area and is surrounded by
substantial environmental damage or
substantially developed properties. The project
substantially or avoidably injure fish or
would not cause substantial environmental
wildlife or their habitat.
damage or substantially or avoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project has
been determined to be exempt from further
environmental review pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Sections 15301(1)(4), 15303(a) and
15315. No substantial damage to the
environment will occur as a result of the
project.
f. That the design of the. subdivision or the
The design. of the subdivision would not result
type of improvements is likely to cause
in serious public health problems. All
serious public health problems.
necessary public facilities and services are in
place, or can be extended, to serve the
project. The applicant has submitted letters of
service /facility availability from fire, sewer,
water and school service providers indicating
that existing facilities are available to service
the proposed project. The project is exempt
8of19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18- 140TPM /CDP
Findings for Tentative Map
Explanation of Finding
1. The project is consistent with the certified
from environmental review pursuant to CEQA
Local Coastal Program of the City of
Guidelines Sections 15301(1)(4), 15303(a),
Encinitas; and
and 15315.
g. That the design of the subdivision or the
All easements of record identified in the
type of improvements will conflict with
preliminary title report for the subject property
easements, acquired by the public at large,
are shown on the proposed Tentative Parcel
for access through or use of, property
Map. No conflicts with public easements of
within the proposed subdivision. In this
record have been identified.
connection, the authorized agency may
coverage and parking. The project is
approve a map if it finds that alternate
consistent with policies of the City's certified
easements, for access or for use, will be
Local Coastal Program including the General
provided, and that these will be
Plan and the Municipal Code.
substantially equivalent to ones previously
No potentially significant adverse impacts to
acquired by the public. This subsection
the environment would result from the project
shall apply only to easements of record or
and the project is exempt from environmental
to easements established by judgment of a
review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections
court of competent jurisdiction and no
15301(1)(4), 15303(a), and 15315.
authority is hereby granted to a legislative
body to determine that the public at large
has acquired easements through or use of
property within the proposed subdivision.
Based on the findings for a Coastal Development Permit as per Encinitas Municipal Code
Section 30.80.090, and the aforementioned analysis, the Development Services
Department has made the following findings to support the approval, with conditions:
Finding for a Coastal Development Permit
Explanation of Finding
1. The project is consistent with the certified
The proposed subdivision complies with all
Local Coastal Program of the City of
applicable development standards of the R -3
Encinitas; and
zone related to minimum net lot area,
minimum lot depth, minimum lot width and
density.
The proposed residence on Parcel 1 complies
with all development standards of the R -3
zone including setbacks, building height, lot
coverage and parking. The project is
consistent with policies of the City's certified
Local Coastal Program including the General
Plan and the Municipal Code.
2. The proposed development conforms with
No potentially significant adverse impacts to
Public Resources Code Section 21000 and
the environment would result from the project
following (CEQA) in that there are no
and the project is exempt from environmental
feasible mitigation measures or feasible
review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections
alternatives available which would
15301(1)(4), 15303(a), and 15315.
substantially lessen any significant adverse
impact that the activity may have on the
environment; and
9 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
Finding for a Coastal Development Permit
Explanation of Finding
3. For projects . involving development
The project site is located on Eolus Avenue,
between the sea or other body of water
which is not located between the sea and the
and the nearest public road, approval shall
nearest public road. Therefore, Section 30200
include a specific finding that such
et. seq. of the Coastal Act does not apply.
development is in conformity with the
public access and . public recreation
policies of Section 30200 et. seq. of the
Coastal Act.
CONCLUSION
The applicant is requesting a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) and Coastal Development Permit
(CDP) for a two -lot subdivision, which would result in two lots that comply with the underlying R-
3 development standards. The existing single - family home on the site will be demolished and a
new single - family home with. an attached garage will be_ built on Parcel 1. The proposed single -
family residence that will be constructed on Parcel 1, complies with the minimum setbacks, lot
coverage, building height, and parking requirements for the R -3 zone. The Development
Services Department has determined the Coastal Development Permit application to be
consistent with all applicable policies of the General Plan, Local Coastal Program, and
provisions of the Municipal Code. Therefore, the project is approved based upon the
aforementioned findings and subject to the following conditions of approval.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
SC4 Approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and all associated permits will expire on January
22, 2021 at 5 p.m., two years after the approval of this project, unless the conditions
have been met or an extension of time has been approved pursuant to the Municipal
Code.
SC6 This project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application and project drawings
stamped received by the City on January 3, 2019, consisting of fourteen sheets including
Tentative Parcel Map (Sheet 1), Preliminary Grading Plan (Sheet 2), a Slope Analysis
(Sheet 3), a Title page (A0.0), Site Plan (A0.1), Existing Site Plan (A0.2), Floor Plans
(A1.0 — A1.2), Roof Plan (A1.2A), Elevations (A2.0 & A2.1), and Preliminary Grading
Plans (3 sheets), all designated as approved by the Development Services Department
on January 22, 2019, and shall not be altered without express authorization by the
Development Services Department.
SCA The following conditions shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Development
Services Department:'.
1. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, the applicant shall demolish all onsite
structures. A Building Permit shall be issued for the demolition of the single - family
residence.
10 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
SCB The following Engineering Division conditions shall be completed to the satisfaction of
the Development Services Department:
The applicant shall provide public improvements along the frontage to Eolus Avenue
including pavement widening to 12 feet from center line and the installation of two
seven feet x 25 feet (42 feet if tandem) pervious paver parking spaces bordered on
all sides by a six inches x 16 inches PCC flush curb. The parkway area shall be
homeowner maintained landscaping or groundcover. The applicant shall record an
Encroachment Maintenance and Removal covenant to ensure the perpetual
maintenance of the improvements in the right -of -way.
2. This site receives storm water runoff from a portion of Eolus Avenue. The applicant
shall capture this historic runoff and safely convey it through the site.
3. The project is located within the Leucadia Wastewater District sphere of influence,
and shall be annexed into the District prior to serving each parcel.
4. The applicant shall provide storm water quality treatment facilities to collect and treat
the runoff generated by all new and /or removed and replaced impervious surfaces.
Additionally, any increase in runoff resulting from an increase in impervious surface
shall be mitigated by sizing and designing the IMP facilities to the HMP sizing
requirements with a lower flow threshold of 0.5Q2 to ensure no net increase in cross
lot drainage. The treatment facility IMPS shall be located entirely within private
property. The cross section of the IMP facility on the Site Plan shall show ten inches
of ponding. This facility shall be sized on the site plan for an effective area equal to
nine percent of the factored impervious surface area. Calculations shall be shown on
the plan and in the hydrology study.
5. Cross lot drainage currently exists to the parcel to the west. A Hold Harmless for
Drainage Agreement will be required with the grading permit, however no increase in
cross lot drainage will be allowed.
6. The project shall provide an energy dissipation and spreading feature for the
proposed bioretention basins so that the overflow from the basins is evenly spread
across the entire length of the basin.
7. The existing survey monuments shall be referenced on the grading plan and shall be
protected in- place. If any monument is disturbed or destroyed it shall be replaced by
a licensed land surveyor and a Corner Record or Record of Survey shall be filed with
the County prior to release of securities.
8. The project proposes 9,973 SF of impervious surface area, which is just shy of the
PDP threshold of 10,000 SF. Special Inspection will be required verifying the
impervious surface areas by field survey prior to occupancy. Since the basins are
already sized for HMP and there are Type B soils, only a SWMA would be required
to bring project into compliance.
SCC The following conditions shall be completed to the specification of the San Dieguito
Water District (SDWD):
11 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
1. Upon development, each parcel shall be individually metered. All meters receiving
capacity credit shall be paid for and installed at one time. Prior to final map'
recordation, the owner shall provide SDWD with a written statement indicating which
lot would receive capacity credits.
2. The developer shall install the water system according to SDWD standards, and
shall dedicate to SDWD the portion of the water system, which is to be public.
3. All water meters shall be located in front of the parcel they are serving and outside of
any existing or proposed travel way. Cost of relocation shall be the responsibility of
the developer. Appurtenances shall be prohibited in roadside ditches.
4. The developer shall show all existing and proposed water facilities on improvement
and /or grading plans for SDWD Approval.
5. The developer shall comply with the SDWD fees, charges, rules and regulations.
G1 STANDARD CONDITIONS:
CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
M1 This approval may be appealed to the City Council within 10 calendar days from the date
of this approval pursuant to Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code.
G4 Prior to recordation of the final parcel map, the owner shall cause a covenant
regarding real property to be recorded. Said covenant shall set forth the terms and
conditions of this grant of approval and shall be of a form and content satisfactory to the
Development Services Director.
G5 The Owner(s) shall waive any claims of liability against the City and indemnify, hold
harmless and defend the City and City's employees regarding any component of the
City's approval, by executing an indemnity agreement in substantially the form as
provided by the Development Services Department prior to recordation of.the final
parcel map and the Development Services Director, or designee, is hereby authorized
to execute the same.
G6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Municipal
Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit
issuance unless specifically waived herein.
G8 Prior to issuing a final inspection on framing, the applicant shall provide a survey from a
licensed surveyor or a registered civil engineer verifying that the building height is in
compliance with the approved plans. The height certification/survey shall be supplemented
with a reduced (8 1/2 in. x 11 in.) copy of the site plan and elevations depicting the exact
point(s) of certification. The engineer /surveyor shall contact the Development Services
Department to identify and finalize the exact point(s) to be certified prior to conducting the
survey.
G11 All retaining and other freestanding walls, fences, and enclosures shall be architecturally
designed in a manner similar to, and consistent with, the primary structures (e.g. stucco-
12 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
coated masonry, split -face block or slump.stone). These items shall be approved by the
Development Services Department prior to the issuance of building and /or grading permits.
G12 All roof- mounted equipment and appurtenances, including, air conditioners and their
associated vents, conduits and other mechanical and electrical equipment, shall be
architecturally integrated, and shall be shielded from view and sound buffered to the
satisfaction of the Development Services Department. Note: All rooftop equipment
shall be assumed visible unless demonstrated otherwise to the satisfaction of the
Development Services Department, and adequate structural support shall be
incorporated into building design. Rooftop vent pipes shall be combined below the roof,
and shall utilize decorative caps where visible from any point. Ground - mounted
mechanical and electrical equipment shall also be screened through use of a wall, fence,
landscaping, berm, or combination thereof to the satisfaction of the Development Services
Department. All exterior accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the
primary building's exterior to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department.
G13 Prior to any use of the project site pursuant to this permit, all conditions of approval
contained herein shall be completed or secured to the satisfaction of the Development
Services Department.
G14 The applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may
include, but not be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service
Fees, School Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Flood Control Mitigation Fees, Park
Mitigation Fees, and Fire Mitigation /Cost Recovery Fees. Arrangements to pay these
fees shall be made prior to final parcel map approval to the satisfaction of the
Development Services Departments. The applicant is advised to contact the
Development Services Department regarding Park Mitigation Fees, Flood Control and
Traffic Fees, applicable School District(s) regarding School Fees, the Fire Department
regarding Fire Mitigation /Cost Recovery Fees, and the applicable Utility Departments or
Districts regarding Water and /or Sewer Fees.
G15 A plan shall be submitted for approval by the Development Services Department and the
Fire Department regarding the security treatment of the site during the construction phase,
the on- and off -site circulation and parking of construction workers' vehicles, and any heavy
equipment needed for the construction of the project.
G20 Garages enclosing required parking spaces shall be kept available and usable for the
parking of owner /tenant vehicles at all times, and may not be rented or conveyed
separately from the appurtenant dwelling unit.
G22 All utility connections shall be designed to coordinate with the architectural elements of the
site so as not to be exposed except where necessary. Locations of pad mounted
transformers, meter boxes, and other utility related items shall be included in the site plan
submitted with the building permit application with an appropriate screening treatment.
Transformers, terminal boxes, meter cabinets, pedestals, ducts and other facilities may
placed above ground provided they are screened with landscaping.
G23 Building plans for all new dwelling units shall include installation of wiring for current or
conduits for future installation of photovoltaic energy generation system(s) and an electric
vehicle charging station.
13 of 19
ME
F1
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
G24 Any wall, fence or combination thereof exceeding six feet in height and facing any
neighboring property or visible from the public right -of -way shall be subject to design review
pursuant to Section 23.08.040.A.1 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. Where a minimum two
feet horizontal offset is provided, within which screening vegetation is provided to the
satisfaction of the Development Services Department, the fence /wall may not be
considered one continuous structure for purpose of measuring height and may be
exempted from design review provided none of the offset fences or walls exceed six feet in
height pursuant to Section 23.08.030.B.1.
G25 Newly constructed single - family dwelling units shall be pre - plumbed for a graywater system
permitted and constructed in accordance with Chapter 16 of the California Plumbing Code
and including a stub -out in a convenient location for integration of the graywater system
with landscape irrigation systems and accepting graywater from all sources permissible in
conformance with the definition of graywater as per Section 14876 of the California Water
Code. Exception: A graywater system shall not be permitted where a percolation test
shows the absorption capacity of the soil is unable to accommodate the discharge of a
graywater irrigation system.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
M2 All project grading shall conform to the approved Tentative Parcel Map. In cases where
no grading is proposed at the time of the Tentative Parcel Map, or in cases where the
grading plan later submitted is not consistent with the approved Tentative Map/Tentative
Parcel Map, the applicant shall be required to obtain a design_ review permit for grading
prior to issuance of grading permits.
CONTACT THE ENCINITAS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
B2R The applicant shall submit a complete set of construction plans to the Development
Services Department for plancheck processing. The submittal shall include a
Soils /Geotechnical Report, structural calculations, and State Energy compliance
documentation (Title 24). Construction plans shall include a site plan, a foundation plan,
floor and roof framing plans, floor plan(s), section details, exterior elevations, and materials
specifications. Submitted plans must show compliance with the latest adopted editions of
the California Building Code (The Uniform Building Code with California Amendments, the
California Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Codes). These comments are preliminary
only. A comprehensive plancheck will be completed prior to permit issuance and additional
technical code requirements may be identified and changes to the originally submitted
plans may be required.
FIRE CONDITIONS:
CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
F2 ACCESS ROAD MINIMUM
Circulation Element Roads
shall have an unobstructed
DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus
and areas within the Very High
improved width of not less than
14 of 19
access roads identified as
Fire Hazard Severity Zone
24 feet and all other roads
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
shall be not less than. 20 feet; curb line to curb line. Exceptions: Single - Family
residential driveways; serving no more than two single - family dwellings, shall have
minimum of 16 feet, curb line to curb line, of unobstructed improved width. Access
roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of not less than
75,000 pounds and shall be provided with an approved paved surface to provide all-
weather driving capabilities and provide a vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6
inches.
F5 GRADE: The gradient for a fire apparatus access roadway shall not exceed 20.0
percent. Grades exceeding 15.0 percent (incline or decline) shall not be permitted
without mitigation. Minimal mitigation shall be a surface of Portland cement concrete,
with a deep broom finish perpendicular to the entire direction of travel. Additional
mitigation measures may be required where deemed appropriate. The angle of
departure and angle of approach of a fire access roadway shall not exceed seven
degrees (12 percent).
F6 GATES: All gates or other structures or devices, which could obstruct fire access
roadways or otherwise hinder emergency operations, are prohibited unless they meet
standards approved by the Fire Department. An approved emergency key- operated
switch and /or an approved emergency traffic control- activating strobe light sensor shall
be installed per Encinitas Fire Department standards.
F8 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: Prior to delivery of combustible building construction
materials to the project site all of the following conditions shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the Fire Department:
1. All wet and dry utilities shall be installed and approved by the appropriate
inspecting department or agency;
2. As a minimum the first lift of asphalt paving shall be in place to provide a
permanent all weather surface for emergency vehicles; and
3. Water supply for fire protection (fire hydrants and standpipes) shall be installed,
in service and accepted by the Fire Department and applicable water district.
F13 ADDRESS NUMBERS: STREET NUMBERS: Approved numbers and /or addresses
shall be placed on all new and existing buildings and at appropriate additional locations
as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property from
either direction of approach. Said numbers shall contrast with their background, and
shall meet the following minimum standards as to size: four inches high with a Y2- inch
stroke width for residential buildings, eight inches high with a Y2 -inch stroke for
commercial and multi - family residential buildings, 12 inches high with a one -inch stroke
for industrial buildings. Additional numbers shall be required where deemed necessary
by the Fire Marshal, such as rear access doors, building corners, and entrances to
commercial centers.
F14 ADDRESS NUMBERS FOR STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF ROADWAY: Where
structures are located off a roadway on long easements /driveways, a monument marker
shall be placed at the entrance where the easement/driveway intersects the main
roadway. Permanent address numbers with height conforming to Fire Department
standards shall be affixed to this marker.
15 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
F15 AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM: Structures shall be protected by an
automatic fire sprinkler system designed and installed to the satisfaction of the Fire
Department,
F18 CLASS "A" ROOF: AII, structures shall be provided with a Class "A" Roof covering to
the satisfaction of the Encinitas Fire Department.
E1 ENGINEERING CONDITIONS:
CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
E2 All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of building /grading permit
issuance shall apply.
E3 All drawings submitted for Engineering permits are required to reference the NAVD 88
datum; the NGVD 29 datum will not be accepted.
EG1 Grading Conditions
EG3 The owner shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or
grading of the site.
EG4 The grading for this project is defined in Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code.
Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose
responsibility shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of
the work with the approved grading plan and submit required reports to the Development
Services Department to verify compliance with Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal
Code.
EG5 No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter,of permission is
obtained from the owners of the affected properties.
EG6 Separate grading plans shall be submitted and approved and separate grading permits
issued for borrow or disposal sites if located within the city limits.
EG7 All newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1.
EG8 A soils /geological /hydraulic report (as applicable) shall be prepared by a. qualified
engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. The report shall be
submitted with the first grading plan submittal and shall be approved prior to issuance of
any grading permit for the project.
EG9 Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this
project the owner shall submit to and receive approval from the Development Services
Director for the proposed haul route. The owner shall comply with all conditions and
requirements the Development Services Director may impose with regards to the hauling
operation.
16 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
EG10 In accordance with Section 23.24.370 (A) of the Municipal Code, no grading permit shall
be issued for work occurring between October 1st of any year and April 15th of the
following year, unless the plans for such work include details of protective measures,
including desilting basins or other temporary drainage or control measures, or both, as
may be deemed necessary by the field inspector to protect the adjoining public and
private property from damage by erosion, flooding, or the deposition of mud or debris
which may originate from the site or result from such grading operations.
EG13 Owner shall provide a precise grading plan prior to approval of building permit. Grading
plan shall provide design for drainage improvements, erosion control, storm water
pollution control, and on -site pavement.
ED1 Drainage Conditions
ED2A An erosion control system shall be designed and installed onsite during all construction
activity. The system shall prevent discharge of sediment and all other pollutants onto
adjacent streets and into the storm drain system. The City of Encinitas Best
Management Practice Manual shall be employed to determine appropriate storm water
pollution control practices during construction.
ED3 A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water originating
within the project site, and all surface waters that may flow onto the project site from
adjacent lands, shall be required. Said drainage system shall include any easements
and structures required by the Development Services Director to properly handle the
drainage.
ED5M The owner shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the final map for
this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with the Master Drainage
Plan and City of Encinitas Standards as required by the Development Services Director.
ED6M The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless covenant regarding
drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the grading permit for this
project.
ED7 Concentrated flows across driveways and/or sidewalks shall not be permitted.
ED8 The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from a 100 -year
frequency storm under developed conditions is equal to or less than the runoff from a storm
of the same frequency and duration under existing conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour
storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to
accomplish the desired results.
ES1 Street Conditions
ES5 Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, a right -of -way construction
permit shall be obtained from the Development Services Director and appropriate fees
paid, in addition to any other permits required.
ES10 Improvements constructed within the present or future public right -of -way shall be
considered temporary. The owner shall enter into an encroachment removal covenant
agreeing to remove those improvements at the direction of the City.
17 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
EU1 Utilities Conditions
EU2M The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the
respective utility agencies regarding services to the project.
EU3M The developer shall be responsible for coordination with.S.D.G. & E., AT &T, and other
applicable authorities.
EU4 All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including existing
utilities unless exempt by the Municipal Code:
ESW 1 Storm Water Pollution Control Conditions
ESW3 Best Management Practice shall be utilized for storm water pollution control to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The surface run off shall be directed over grass and
landscaped areas prior to collection and discharge onto the street and /or into the,public
storm drain system. If pipes are used for area drainage, inlets shall be located to allow
maximum flow distance over grass and non - erodable landscape areas. A grass lined
ditch, reinforced with erosion control blanket, or a rip -rap lined drainage ditch shall be
used instead of a concrete ditch where feasible. Hardscaped areas and driveways shall
be sloped toward grassy and landscaped areas. Driveways with a grass or gravel lined
swale in the middle can be used if the site topography does not allow for the discharge
of driveway runoff over landscaped areas: The Grading Plan shall identify all landscape
areas designed for storm water pollution control (SWPC). A note shall be placed on the
plans indicating that the BMPs are to be privately maintained and the facilities not
modified or removed without a permit from the City.
ESW5 The project must meet storm water quality and pollution control requirements. The
applicant shall design and construct landscape and /or turf areas and ensure that all
flows from impervious surfaces are directed across these areas prior to discharging onto
the street. A Grading Plan identifying all landscape areas designed for storm water
pollution control (SWPC) and Best Management Practice shall be submitted to the City
for Development Services Department approval. A note shall be placed on the plans
indicating that the modification or removal of the SWPC facilities without a permit from
the City is prohibited.
ESW6 Storm Water Pollution Control (SWPC) facilities shall be designed and approved by the
City Engineer, and secured with a performance bond prior to the issuance of a Grading
permit for this project.
ESW9 For storm water pollution control purposes, all runoff from all roof drains shall discharge
onto grass and landscape areas prior to collection and discharge onto the street and /or
into the public storm drain system. Grass and landscape areas designated for storm
water pollution control shall not be modified without a permit from the City. A note to this
effect shall be placed on the Grading plan.
EM1 Map Conditions
EM3 This project is approved specifically as one (single) phase
18 of 19
ITEM NAME: Ryan,Tentative Parcel Map
PROJECT NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
EM5 Public /private improvement plans and grading plans shall be approved and adequate
surety shall be posted prior to a public hearing for approval of the final map.
DISCLOSURES
This notice constitutes 'a decision of the Development Services Department only for the
discretionary entitlement. Additional permits, such as Building and Grading Permits, may be
required by the Development Services Department or other City Departments. It is the property
owner's and applicant's responsibility to obtain all necessary permits required for the type of
project proposed.
In accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code Section 1.12, the decision of the
Development Services Department may be appealed to the City Council within 10 calendar
days of the date of this determination. The appeal must be filed, accompanied by a $300 filing
fee, prior to 5:00 pm on the 10`h calendar day following the date of this Notice of Decision. Any
filing of an appeal will suspend this action as well as any processing of permits in reliance
thereon in accordance with Encinitas Municipal Code Section 1.12.020(D)(1) until such time as
an action is taken on the appeal. The action of the Development Services Department may
not be appealed to the Coastal Commission.
SIGNATURE
19 of 19
To
COMMUNITY AREA:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT REVIEW
Q U E S T E D "CONTINUE COMMENTS ON
BACK IF NECESSARY"
REQUEST
® Re- Review, Note Changes
CITY OF
ENCINITAS
keY/ ; �l- trrG4
Date: 12
Comments to Planner:
Development Services
Department
• F5 (� ��
505 South
Vulcan
Avenue
E n c i n i t a s,
C A
9 2 0
2 4 -
3 6 3 3
I/.i I. c
. —, O
LEUCADIA SUBMITTAL DATE: 07 /18 CYCLE REVIEW# 2
18- 140/141 TPM /CDP FINANCE NUMBER: LEVEL: 3
Eolus LLC
1112 Eolus Ave APN: 254- 391 -10 -00
TPM /CDP to demo SFR/ subdivide one lot to two, and build new SFR on both lots
Roy Sapa'u, City Planner
Laurie 'linter, Associate Planner
Scott Vurbeff, Environmental Coordinator
"Include photographs"
Nicole Piano - Jones, Housing Management Analyst
Steve Sander, Building Division Supervisor
Steve Sand-er, Code Enforcement
Kern Berberet /Anita Pupping, Fire Marshal
Traffic Engineer
Steve Nowak, Senior Civil Engineer
Blair Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer, San Dieguito
Water District
Annette Saul, Park Operations Manager
REFERRALDATE: 10/04/18
RETURN BY: 10/19/18
RETURN REVIEWED PROJECTS
TO PROJECT PLANNER
Dan Halverson Ext. 2711
.DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
For questions /comments, please contact Planner
Jim Knowlton, Geotechnical Consultant (Engineering)
David Van Pelt, GIS Project Manager **TMs and TPMs only"
John Ugrob, Assistant Superintendent "ROW - related Projects"
Jonathan L. Kramer, Wireless Consultant "Please refer to EMC 9.70.080"
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Crime Prevention Specialist Jackie Stockholm (760- 966 -3587)
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Captain John Mayron * *For Alcohol - Related Projects **
Maria Gremban, Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) /Public Notice Coordinator
A C T I O N R E
Q U E S T E D "CONTINUE COMMENTS ON
BACK IF NECESSARY"
Initial Review
® Re- Review, Note Changes
Reviewed by:
keY/ ; �l- trrG4
Date: 12
Comments to Planner:
• F5 (� ��
Fly lcl � )g.
T: \Templates \CD Forms \Project Review Request Forrn — INTERNAL Last Revised: 10/4/2018
COMMUNITY AREA:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION:
LLC
1112
PROJECT
REVIEW
COMMENTS ON BACK IF NECESSARY"
REQUEST
CITY
OF
ENCINITAS
D e v e l
o p m e n t S e r v i c e s
D e p a r t m e n t
5
0 5 S o u t h
V u l c a n
A v e n u e
E
n c i n i t a s,
C A 9 2 0
2 4 - 3 6 3 3
1 TPM
SU
07
NUMBER: LEVEL:
TPM /CDP to demo SFR/ subdivide one lot to two, and build new SFR on both lots
Roy Sapa'u, City Manner
Laurie Winter, Associate Planner
Scott Vurbeff, Environmental Coordinator
"Include photographs"
Nicole PianoJon_s, Housing Management Analyst
Steve Sanders, Ezuilding Division Supervisor
Steve Sanders, Code Enforcement
Kern Berberet /Anita Pupping, Fire Marshal
Traffic Engineer
Steve Nowak, Senior Civil Engineer
Blair Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer, San Dieguito
Water District
Annette Saul, Park Operations Manager
REFERRAL DATE: 10/04/18
RETURN BY: 10/19/18
i RETURN REVIEwED PROJECTS,
TO PROJECT PLANNER
Dan Halverson Ext, 2711
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
For,questions /comments, please. contact Planner,,
L_:
Jim Knowlton, Geotechnical Consultant (Engineering)
David Van Pelt, GIS Project Manager • TMs and TPMs only'*
John Ugrob, Assistant Superintendent "ROW related Projects"
Jonathan L. Kramer, Wireless Consultant **Please refer to EMC 9.70.080`
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Crime Prevention Specialist Jackie Stockholm (760- 966 -3587)
Sheriffs Office (Encinitas): Captain John Mayron * *For Alcohol - Related Projects **
Maria Gremban, Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) /Public Notice Coordinator
A C T I O N R E
Q U E S T E D "CONTINUE
COMMENTS ON BACK IF NECESSARY"
Initial Review
Reviewed by:
Comments to Planner:
® Re- Review, Note Changes
SIn ��
111
O l �� Date:
T: \Templates \CD Forms \Project Review Request Form - INTERNAL Last Revised: 10/4/2018
October 30, 2018
18 -140 TPM /CDP (RE- REVIEW)
Planner: Dan Halverson
Address: 1112 Eolus Avenue
Project: TPM / CDP to split one lot into two lots and build new SFR.
SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT CONDITIONS:
1. The subject property is currently being served by a 1 -inch water meter.
2. Upon development, each parcel will be required to be individually metered.
3. The developer shall install the water system according to Water Agencies'
(WAS) standards.
4. The district will require that water meters be located in front of the parcel
they are serving and outside of any existing or proposed travel way. Cost
of relocation is the responsibility of the developer. Appurtenances shall not
be placed in roadside ditches.
5. The developer will be required to show all existing and proposed water
facilities on improvement and /or grading plans for District Approval.
6. The developer is required to comply with the District's fees, charges, rules
and regulations.
To
COMMUNITY AREA:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT REVIEW
E S T E D— CONTINUE COMMENTS ON BACK IF NECESSARY"
❑ Initial Review ®
Reviewed by:
Comments to Planner:
REQUEST
CITY OF
ENCINITAS
D e v e l o p m e n t S e r v
i c e s
D e
p a r t m e n t
5 0 5 S o u t h
V u
l c a n
A v
e n u e
E n c i n i t a s,
C A
9 2 0
2 4 -
3 6 3 3
LEUCADIA SUBMITTAL DATE: 07/03/18 CYCLE REVIEW# 2
18- 140/141 TPM /CDP FINANCE NUMBER: LEVEL: 3
Eolus LLC
1112 Eolus Ave APN: 254- 391 -10 -00
TPM /CDP to demo SFR/ subdivide one lot to two, and build new SFR on both lots
Roy Sapa'u, City Pianner
Laurie Y /inrer, Associate Planner
Scott Vurbeff, Environmental Coordinator
*'Include photographs'*
Nicole Piano - Jones, Housing Management Analyst
Steve Sanders, Building Division Supervisor
Steve Sanders, Code Enforcement
Kerr! Berberet /Anita Pupping, Fire Marshal
Traffic Engineer
Steve Nowak, Senior Civil Engineer
Blair Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer, San Dieguito
Water District
Annette Saul, Park Operations Manager
REFERRAL DATE: 10/04/18
RETURN BY: 10/19/18
RETURN REVIEWED PROJECTS
TO PROJECT PLANNER
Dan Halverson
Ext. 2711
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
For questions /comments, please contact Planner
Jim Knowlton, Geotechnical Consultant (Engineering)
David Van Pelt, GIS Project Manager * *TMs and TPMs only*'
John Ugrob, Assistant Superintendent' *ROW - related Projects **
Jonathan L. Kramer, Wireless Consultant "Please refer to EMC 9.70.080" -
Sheriffs Office (Encinitas): Crime Prevention Specialist Jackie Stockholm (760 - 966 -3587)
Sheriff's Office.(Encinitas): Captain John Mayron * *For Alcohol - Related Projects **
Maria Gremban„ Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) /Public Notice Coordinator
A C T 1 0 N R E Q U
E S T E D— CONTINUE COMMENTS ON BACK IF NECESSARY"
❑ Initial Review ®
Reviewed by:
Comments to Planner:
Re- Review, Note Changes
Date: lZ /4 /iy
T: \Templates \cD Forms\Project Review Request Form — INTERNAL Last Revised: 10/4/2018
e
December 4, 2018
18 -140 TPM CDP, 254 - 391 -38, 1112 Eolus Avenue, Tourmaline Properties Inc
Planner: Dan Halverson
Project: Demolition of existing residence and construction of two new with
parcel map.
E1 ENGINEERING CONDITIONS:
CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S):
E2 All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of building /grading
permit issuance shall apply.
E3 All drawings submitted for Engineering permits are required to reference the
NAVD 88 datum; the NGVD 29 datum will not be accepted.
EG1 Grading Conditions
EG3 The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any
clearing or grading of the site.
EG4 The grading for this project is defined in Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal
Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose
responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure
compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to
the Engineering Services Director and verify compliance with Chapter 23.24 of the
Encinitas Municipal Code.
EG5 No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission
is obtained from the owners of the affected properties.
EG6 Separate grading plans shall be submitted and approved and separate grading
permits issued for borrow or disposal sites if located within the city limits.
EG7 All newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1.
EG8 A soils /geological /hydraulic report (as applicable) shall be prepared by a qualified
engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. The report shall
be submitted with the first grading plan submittal and shall be approved prior to
issuance of any grading permit for the project.
EG9 Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site
within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the
Engineering Services Director for the proposed haul route. The developer shall
b
ESW6Storm Water Pollution Control (SWPC) facilities shall be designed and approved
by the City Engineer, and secured with a performance bond prior to the issuance
of a grading permit for this project.
ESW9 For storm water pollution control purposes, all runoff from all roof drains shall
discharge onto grass and landscape areas prior to collection and discharge onto
the street and /or into the public storm drain system. Grass and landscape areas
designated for storm water pollution control shall not be modified without a permit
from the City. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Grading plan.
EM1 Map Conditions
EM3 This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) phase.
EM5 Public /private improvement plans and grading plans shall be approved and
adequate surety shall be posted prior to a public hearing for approval of the final
map.
Engineering Special Conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide public improvements along the frontage to Eolus Avenue
including pavement widening to 12 feet from center line and the installation of two
Tx25' (42' if tandem) pervious paver parking spaces bordered on all sides by a
6 "x16" PCC flush curb. The parkway area shall be homeowner maintained
landscaping or groundcover. The applicant shall record an Encroachment
Maintenance and Removal covenant to ensure the perpetual maintenance of the
improvements in the right -of -way.
2. This site receives stormwater runoff from a portion of Eolus Avenue. The applicant
shall capture this historic runoff and safely convey it through the site.
3. The project is located within the Leucadia Wastewater District sphere of influence,
and will need to be annexed into the District prior to serving each parcel.
4. The applicant shall provide stormwater quality treatment facilities to collect and treat
the runoff generated by all new and /or removed and replaced impervious surfaces.
Additionally, any increase in runoff resulting from an increase in impervious surface
shall be mitigated by sizing and designing the IMP facilities to the HMP sizing
requirements with a lower flow threshold of 0.5Q2 to ensure no net increase in cross
lot drainage. The treatment facility IMPs shall be located entirely within private
property. The cross section of the IMP facility on the. Site Plan shall show 10" of
ponding. This facility shall be sized on the site plan for an effective area equal to
9.0% of the factored impervious surface area. Calculations shall be shown on the
plan and in the hydrology study.
5. Cross lot drainage currently exists to the parcel to the west. A Hold Harmless for
Drainage Agreement will be required with the grading permit, however no increase in
cross lot drainage will be allowed.
6. The project shall provide an energy dissipation and spreading feature for the
proposed bioretention basins so that the overflow from the basins is evenly spread
across the entire length of the basin.
7. The existing survey monuments shall be referenced on the grading plan and shall be
protected in- place. If any monument is disturbed or destroyed it shall be replaced by
a licensed land surveyor and a Corner Record or Record of Survey shall be filed with
the County prior to release of securities.
8. The project proposes 9,973 SF of impervious surface area, which is just shy of the
PDP threshold of 10,000 SF. Special Inspection will be required verifying the
impervious surface areas by field survey prior to occupancy. Since the basins are
already sized for HMP and there are Type B soils, only a SWMA would be required
to bring project into compliance.
PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST
CITY OF ENCINITAS
D e v e l o p m e n t S e r v i c e s D e p a r t m e n t
5 0 5 S o u t h V u l c a n A v e n u e
E n c i n i t a s, C A 9 2 0 2 4 - 3 6 3 3
COMMUNITY AREA: LEUCADIA SUBMITTAL DATE: 07/03/18 CYCLE REVIEW# 2
CASE NUMBER: 18- 140/141 TPM /CDP FINANCE NUMBER: LEVEL: 3
APPLICANT: Eolus LLC
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1112 Eolus Ave APN: 254 7391 -10 -00
DESCRIPTION: TPM /CDP to demo SFR/ subdivide one lot to two, and build new SFR on both lots
To: ❑ Roy Sapa'u, City Planner - REFERRAL DATE: 10/04/18
❑ Laurie Winter, Associate Planner RETURN BY:
Scott Vurbeff, Environmental Coordinator
"Include photographs"
❑ Nicole Piano- Jones, Housing Management Analyst RETURN REVIEWED PROJECTS
❑ Steve Sanders, Building Division Supervisor TO PROJECT PLANNER
❑ Steve Sanders, Code Enforcement Dan Halverson Ext. 2711
® Kern Berberet /Anita Pupping, Fire Marshal . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Traffic Engineer For questions /comments, please contact Planner
® Steve Nowak, Senior Civil Engineer
Blair Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer, San Dieguito
Water District
❑ Annette Saul, Park Operations Manager
❑ Jim Knowlton, Geotechnical Consultant (Engineering)
David Van Pelt, GIs Project Manager * *TMs and TPMs only **
John ugrob, Assistant Superintendent * *ROW- related Projects **
Jonathan L. Kramer, Wireless Consultant * *Please refer to EMC 9.70.080 **
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Crime Prevention Specialist Jackie Stockholm (760 - 966 -3587)
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Captain John Mayron * *For Alcohol - Related Projects **
Maria Gremban, Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) /Public Notice Coordinator
10/19/18
A C T I O N R E Q U E S T E D* *CONTINUE COMMENTS ON BACK IF NECESSARY **
❑ Initial Review ® Re- Review, Note Changes
Reviewed by: Date:
Comments to Planner:
T: \Templates \CD Forms \Project Review Request Farm — INTERNAL Last Revised: 10/4/2018
City of Encinitas
(Development Services Department
5055. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92 02 4 -3 633
September 24, 2018
Deborah Shewaga
1802 Hygeia Ave.
Encinitas, CA 92024
Deborah (a)sandieooarchitects.com
1sT REVIEW CYCLE COMMENTS
CASE NO. 18-140 TPM /CDP & 18 -141 CDP
Dear Deborah:
VIA EMAIL AND MAIL
The Department of Planning and Building (Department) has reviewed your application for a lot
subdivision, a new home on Lot A and Coastal Permit for a new home on Lot B. Staff is
providing you with the attached package of information as a guide for further processing your
application. The request requires approval of the following permits: Tentative Parcel Map,
Coastal Development Permit, and a Coastal Development Permit for Lot B.
Project applications are not only reviewed by the Department, but they are routed to other City
departments such as Encinitas Fire Department and Public Works (Engineering and Traffic)
Department for their review to ensure compliance with the codes and regulations they are
charged with enforcing. This letter is intended to include a comprehensive list of the comments
and corrections required by all commenting departments.
A. DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS
El
The Department has reviewed your application and has determined that it is
complete pursuant to Section 65943 of the Government Code.
The Department has completed its initial review of your application and cannot
find it complete pursuant to Section 65943 of the Government Code at this
®
time. Please provide the items required to be submitted in the attached
Completeness Checklist (Attachment A) in order to deem your application
complete.
B. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
When you are ready to submit the corrected materials/requested information, please
contact me to schedule a meeting to briefly go over the materials before you officially
submit. Unless other agreements have been made with City staff, you must submit all of
the items identified in Attachment E concurrently and by the submittal date listed below
in order to maintain the processing schedule for your application. A meeting with staff is
required for submittal. No incomplete submittal will be accepted and no over - the - counter
submittal will be accepted unless special arrangements were made with me prior to
submittal.
TeG (760) 633 -2710; ExC. (760) 633 -2818
Project #18 -140 TPM /CDP & 18 -141 CDP Page 2
September 24, 2018
Should you have any disagreements with the requirements within this letter, please contact me
as soon as possible to discuss. If following that discussion you are still unsatisfied with the
direction, I will schedule a meeting with you (and your development team if desired) and my
supervisor so that we may be able to jointly discuss our differences and find resolution. If we
are still at an impasse, you may have the matter referred to the Project Issue Resolution (PIR)
process to provide you with an opportunity to quickly and inexpensively have issues considered
by senior City management. Issues considered under this procedure can include: (a)
disagreements with staff interpretations of codes or ordinances, (b) requests for additional
information or studies, or (c) disagreements regarding project related processing requirements.
Please contact me to learn more about this process, or visit our website via the link below.
htto: / /www.enci nitasca.aov /modules /showdocu ment. asox ?documentid =3265
The Department's goal is to help facilitate the efficient and timely processing of each
application. If you have any questions regarding this letter or any other aspects of your project
or the process, please contact me at (760) 633 -2711 or via email at
dhalversonna encinitasca.aov.
Sincerely,
Dan Haihverson
DAN HALVERSON, Associate Planner
Development Services Division
cc: Ben Ryan — Tourmaline properties, Inc.: Ben@tourmalineproperties.com
Project #18 -140 TPM /CDP & 18 -141 CDP
COMMENT LETTER ATTACHMENT MATRIX
Page 3
September 24, 2018
Attachment
A
Item
Planning General Comments
B
Engineering Comments
C
Fire Department Comments
D
San Dieguito Water District Comments
E
Re- submittal Requirements Table
Project #18 -140 TPM /CDP 8 18-141 CDP Page 4
September 24, 2018
ATTACHMENT A
PLANNING GENERAL COMMENTS
Please contact me should you have any questions or need clarification on how to resolve any of
the items listed below.
a. Dimension the 1 additional space (enclosed or unenclosed) as
dwelling exceeds 2,500 square feet. (Lot A and Lot B)
b. Label existing and finished grade on all elevations. On both lots the
existing and finished grades need clarifying.
c. Lot A appears to be over height on Sheet A2.1A North side and West
side. Please ensure all heights meet the 22 or 26 feet height limits
taken from the lower of the finished or natural grade.
Lot B appears to be over height on the West elevation (Rear). The
height limit is 26 feet from the natural or finished grade whichever is
lower.
Project #18 -140 TPM /CDP & 18 -141 CDP Page 5
September 24, 2018
ATTACHMENT B
ENGINEERING (GRADING, STORM WATER, ETC.) COMMENTS
Please contact me or Jesse Owens at (760) 633 -2780 or via e-mail at iowens(aencinitasca.00v
should you have any questions or need clarification on how to resolve any of the items listed
below.
The applicant shall provide public improvements along the frontage to
Eolus Avenue to include pavement widening to 12 feet from center line and
the installation of two 7'x25' (42' if tandem) pervious paver parking spaces
1
bordered on all sides by a 6 "x16" PCC flush curb. The parkway area shall
be homeowner maintained landscaping or groundcover. The applicant
shall record an Encroachment Maintenance and Removal covenant to
ensure the perpetual maintenance of the improvements in the right -of -way.
This site receives stormwater runoff from a portion of Eolus Avenue. The
2.
applicant shall capture this historic runoff and safely convey it through the
site.
The project is located within the Leucadia Wastewater District sphere of
3
influence, and will need to be annexed into the District prior to serving each
parcel. Show each sewer lateral and note if a pump will be necessary.
The applicant shall provide stormwater quality treatment facilities to collect
and treat the runoff generated by all new and /or removed and replaced
impervious surfaces. Additionally, any increase in runoff resulting from an
increase in impervious surface shall be mitigated by sizing and designing
the IMP facilities to the HMP sizing requirements with a lower flow
4
threshold of 0.5Q2 to ensure no net increase in cross lot drainage. The
treatment facility IMPS shall be located entirely within private property. The
cross section of the IMP facility on the Site Plan shall show 10" of ponding.
This facility shall be sized on the site plan for an effective area equal to
9.0% of the factored impervious surface area. Calculations shall be shown
on the site plan and in the hydrology study.
Cross lot drainage currently exists to the parcel to the west. A Hold
5
Harmless for Drainage Agreement will be required with the grading permit,
however no increase in cross lot drainage will be allowed.
The project shall provide an energy dissipation and spreading feature for
the proposed bioretention basins so that the overflow from the basins is
6.
evenly spread across the entire length of the basin. The basin for Parcel 1
shall be conveyed to the basin in Parcel 2 (by pipe is acceptable with
private drainage easement).
The existing survey monuments shall be referenced on the grading plan
and shall be protected in -place. If any monument is disturbed or destroyed
7.
it shall be replaced by a licensed land surveyor and a Corner Record or
Record of Survey shall be filed with the County prior to release of
securities.
Project #18 -140 TPM /CDP & 18 -141 CDP
Page 6
September 24, 2018
8
The overhead service lines to the building shall be constructed
underground. Place a note on all versions of the site plan.
The project proposes 9,973 SF of impervious surface area, which is just
shy of the PDP threshold of 10,000 SF. Special Inspection will be required
9.
verifying the impervious surface areas by field survey prior to occupancy.
Since the basins are already sized for HMP and there are Type B soils,
only a SWMA would be required to bring project into compliance.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Project #18 -140 TPM /CDP & 18 -141 COP Page 7
September 24, 2018
ATTACHMENT C
FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Please contact Kerri Berberet at (760) 943 -2229, or via email at kberberet(a-)encinitasca.gov
should you have any questions or need clarification on how to resolve any of the items listed
below.
Correction F2: Confirm width of driveway in relation to the drainage.
Existing cross section B on grading plans doesn't appear to be
consistent with plan view of driveway. Is the drainage within the
16 feet?
Correction F5: Driveway exceeds 15% (shows 18 %) and shall comply
2 with GRADE requirements —PCC with heavy broom finish for
traction.
Project #18 -140 TPM /CDP & 18-141 CDP Page 8
September 24, 2018
ATTACHMENT D
SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT (SDWD) COMMENTS
Please contact Blair Knoll at (760) 633 -2793, or via email at bknoll(CDencinitasca.00v should
you have any questions or need clarification on how to resolve any of the items listed below.
a) Show the existing 1 -inch water meter on Parcel 1 and call out "to
remain ".
1
b) Show the proposed water meter for Parcel @ and call out the
proposed size.
Project #18 -140 TPM /CDP & 18-141 CDP Page 9
September 24, 2018
ATTACHMENT E
RE- SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS TABLE
Please contact me should you have any questions or need clarification on how to resolve
any of the items listed below. Please contact me in advance for a Special Handling Form if
you wish to submit other documents not specifically listed above.
Information/Document
Copies
Form
Putposes Only
City's Comment Letter
1
cord
File
File
Applicant Response Letter
Hard
Planning
Addressing Corrections/Comments
4
Copy
Engineering
Fire
SDWD
File
Hard
Planning
Revised Plans
4
Copy
Engineering
Fire
SDWD
.IBM Hypda Aw, Pndnpn, G 82M - Ph 7849668773
Emall: ddlemhQWdlepoamhRxn.wm Walnita: r ,,amdlapoerchdadtcom
ENGINEERING COMMENTS RESPONSE- ATTACHEMNT 8:
ITEM 1: Refer to updated grading plans and civil Engineers response. Public
improvement has also been added on both Site plans A0.1.
ITEMS 2 -6: Refer to updated grading plans and civil Engineers response.
ITEM -7: Refer to updated grading plans and civil Engineers response. Note
has also been added on both Site plans A0.1.
ITEM 8:. Note has also been added on both Site plans A0.1.
FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS RESPONSE- ATTACHEMNT C:
ITEM 1,2: Refer to updated grading plans and Civil Engineers response.
ITEM 1 a, b: Refer to updated grading plans and civil Engineers response.
2
To:
PROJECT
REVIEW
IF NECESSARY"
® Initial Review
Reviewed by:
Comments to Planner:
REQUEST
CITY
OF
ENCINITAS
D e v e l o p m e
n t S e r v
i c e s
D e p a r t m e n t
5 0 5 S o
u t h
V u
l c a n
A v e n u e
E n c i n i t
a s,
C A
9 2 0
2 4 - 3 6 3 3
COMMUNITY AREA: LEUCADIA SUBMITTAL DATE: 07/03118 CYCLE REVIEW# 1
CASE NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP FINANCE NUMBER: LEVEL: 3
APPLICANT: Eolus LOTS lit and new SFR
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1112 Eolus Ave APN: 254 -391- -00
DESCRIPTION: TPM/ CDP to Split one lot into two lots and build new SFR 10
Roy Sapa'u, City Planner
Laurie Winter, Associate Planner
Scott Vurbeff, Environmental Coordinator
"Include photographs"
Nicole Piano - Jones, Housing Management Analyst'
Steve Sanders, Building Division Supervisor
Steve Sanders, Code Enforcement
Kern Berberet /Anita Pupping, Fire Marshal
Traffic Engineer
Steve Nowak, Senior Civil Engineer
Blair Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer, San Dieguito
Water District
Annette Saul, Park Operations Manager
REFERRAL DATE: 07/03/18
RETURN BY: 07/20/18
RETURN REVIEWED PROJECTS
TO PROJECT PLANNER
Dan Halverson Ext. 2711
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
_For _ questions /.comments,.please.coritact.Pla nner
Jim Knowlton, Geotechnical Consultant (Engineering)
David Van Pelt, GIS Project Manager **TMs and TPMs only"
John Ugrob, Assistant Superintendent "ROW- related Projects"
Jonathan L. Kramer, Wireless Consultant` *Please refer to EMC 9.70.080"
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Crime Prevention Specialist Jackie Stockholm (760 - 966 -3587)
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Captain John Mayron * *For Alcohol - Related Projects **
Maria Gremban, Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) /Public Notice Coordinator
A C T I O N R E
Q U E S T E D* *CONTINUE COMMENTS ON BACK
IF NECESSARY"
® Initial Review
Reviewed by:
Comments to Planner:
❑ Re- Review, Note Changes
C4 4 o m D I So n Date:
�---/
C q GcCneol Gh c4uy Y-C
2 l I 1g,
i c
T: \Templates \CD Forms \Project Review Request Form - INTERNAL Last Revised: 713/2018
. 1
July 25, 2018
18 -140 TPM /CDP
Planner: Dan Halverson
Address: 1112 Eolus Avenue
Project: TPM / CDP to split one lot into two lots and build new SFR.
SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT COMMENTS:
1. Show existing 1 -inch water meter for Parcel 1 and call out "to remain."
2. Show proposed water meter for Parcel 2. Call out proposed size.
SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT CONDITIONS:
1. The subject property is currently being served by a 1 -inch water meter.
2. Upon development, each parcel will be required to be individually metered.
3. The developer shall install the water system according to Water Agencies'
(WAS) standards.
4. The district will require that water meters be located in front of the parcel
they are serving and outside of any existing or proposed travel way. Cost
of relocation is the responsibility of the developer. Appurtenances shall not
be placed in roadside ditches.
5. The developer will be required to show all existing and proposed water
facilities on improvement and /or grading plans for District Approval.
6. The developer is required to comply with the District's fees, charges, rules
and regulations.
( .:
To:
COMMUNITY AREA:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT REVIEW
Q U E S T E D "CONTINUE
COMMENTS ON BACK IF NECESSARY"
REQUEST
CITY OF
ENCINITAS
Reviewed by:
L r; b!r 6e,'
D e v e l o p m e n t S e r v
i c e s
D e p a r t m e n t
505 South
Vulcan
Avenue
E n c i n i t a s,
C A
9 2 0
2 4 - 3 6 3 3
LEUCADIA SUBMITTAL DATE: 07/03/18 CYCLE REVIEW# 1
18 -140 TPM /CDP FINANCE NUMBER: LEVEL: 3
Eolus LOTS lit and new SFR
1112 Eolus Ave APN: 254- 391 -38 -00
TPM/ CDP to Split one lot into two lots and build new SFR
Roy Sapa'u, City Planner
Laurie Winter, Associate Planner
Scott Vurbeff, Environmental Coordinator
"Include photographs"
Nicole Piano - Jones, Housing Management Analyst
Steve Sanders, Building Division Supervisor
Steve Sanders, Code Enforcement
Kerri Berberet /Anita Pupping, Fire Marshal
Traffic Engineer
Steve Nowak, Senior Civil Engineer
Blair Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer, San Dieguito
Water District
Annette Saul, Park Operations Manager
REFERRAL DATE: 07/03/18
RETURN BY: 07/20/18
RETURN REVIEWED PROJECTS
TO PROJECT PLANNER
Dan Halverson Ext. 2711
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
For questions /comments,_ please contact Planner
Jim Knowlton, Geotechnical Consultant (Engineering)
David Van Pelt, GIS Project Manager **TMs and TPMs only**
John Ugrob, Assistant Superintendent **ROW- related Projects —
Jonathan L. Kramer, Wireless Consultant "Please refer to EMC 9.70.080"
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Crime Prevention Specialist Jackie Stockholm (760 - 966 -3587)
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Captain John Mayron * *For Alcohol - Related Projects **
Maria Gremban, Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) /Public Notice Coordinator
A C T I O N R E
Q U E S T E D "CONTINUE
COMMENTS ON BACK IF NECESSARY"
N. Initial Review
Re- Review, Note Changes
Reviewed by:
L r; b!r 6e,'
Date: h I2v I' O
Comments to Planner:
Z Cof rcc i.
on 5V oW racAlh
�Civ� GY1�S,S S� -tl0'1
T: \T'emplates \CD Forms Paect R-ew Requrl Form - NTERNAr/SA ^ Last Revised: 7/3/2018
ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT- PROJECT REVIEW
CASE NO.:
18 -141 CDP
ADDRESS:
1112 Eolus Ave
PARCEL NO:
254 - 391 -38
APPLICANT:
Eolus Ave Res 2
NOTE TO PLANNER: The following comments, corrections and /or conditions are based on
plans dated 713118 . Final conditions will be provided after comments and /or
corrections have been addressed.
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
None.
Correction F2: Confirm width of driveway in relation to the drainage. Existing cross section
B on grading plans doesn't appear to be consistent with plan view of driveway. Is the
drainage within the 16 feet?
Correction F5: Driveway exceeds .15% (shows 18 %) and shall comply with GRADE
requirements —PCC with heavy broom finish for traction.
STANDARD CONDITIONS:
F2 ACCESS ROAD MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roads identified as
Circulation Element Roads and areas within the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone shall
have an unobstructed improved width of not less than 24 feet and all other roads shall be
not less than 20 feet; curb line to curb line. Exceptions: Single - Family residential driveways;
serving no more than two single - family dwellings, shall have minimum of 16 feet, curb line
to curb line, of unobstructed improved width. Access roads shall be designed and
maintained to support the imposed loads of not less than 75,000 pounds and shall be
provided with an approved paved surface to provide all- weather driving capabilities and
provide a vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches.
F5 GRADE: The gradient for a fire apparatus access roadway shall not exceed 20.0 %.
Grades exceeding 15.0% (incline or decline) shall not be permitted without mitigation.
Minimal mitigation shall be a surface of Portland cement concrete, with a deep broom finish
perpendicular to the entire direction of travel. Additional mitigation measures may be
required where deemed appropriate. The angle of departure and angle of approach of a fire
access roadway shall not exceed seven degrees (12 percent).
F6 GATES: All gates or other structures or devices, which could obstruct fire access roadways
or otherwise hinder emergency operations, are prohibited unless they meet standards
approved by the Fire Department. An approved emergency key- operated switch and /or an
approved emergency traffic control- activating strobe light sensor shall be installed per
Encinitas Fire Department standards.
F8 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: Prior to delivery of combustible building construction
materials to the project site all of the following conditions shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the Fire Department:
1. All wet and dry utilities shall be installed and approved by the appropriate
inspecting department or agency;
2. As a minimum the first lift of asphalt paving shall be in place to provide a
permanent all weather surface for emergency vehicles; and
3. Water supply for fire protection (fire hydrants and standpipes) shall be installed,
in service and accepted by the Fire Department and applicable water district.
F13 ADDRESS NUMBERS: STREET NUMBERS: Approved numbers and /or addresses shall
be placed on all new and existing buildings and at appropriate additional locations as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or roadway fronting the property from either
direction of approach. Said numbers shall contrast with their background, and shall meet
the following minimum standards as to size: 4" high with a ' /z" inch stroke width for
residential buildings, 8" high with a 1/2" stroke for commercial and multi - family residential
buildings, 12" high with a V stroke for industrial buildings. Additional numbers shall be
required where deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal, such as rear access doors, building
corners, and entrances to commercial centers.
F14 ADDRESS NUMBERS FOR STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF ROADWAY: Where
structures are located off a roadway on long easements /driveways, a monument marker
shall be placed at the entrance where the easement/driveway intersects the main roadway.
Permanent address numbers with height conforming to Fire Department standards shall be
affixed to this marker.
F15A AUTOMATIC FIRE. SPRINKLER SYSTEM -ONE AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS:
Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system designed and installed
to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall
be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.
F18 CLASS "A" ROOF: All structures shall be.provided with a Class "A" Roof covering to the
satisfaction of the Encinitas Fire Department.
To
COMMUNITY AREA:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION:
//
ON
E
al
PROJECT REVIEW
Q U E S T E D* *CONTINUE COMMENTS
ON BACK IF NECESSARY"
REQUEST
F1 Re- Review, Note Changes
�
CITY OF
ENCINITAS
D e v e l o p m e n t S e r v
i c e s
D e p a r
t m e n t
505 South
Vulcan
Avenue
E n c i n i t a s.
C A
9 2 0
2 4 - 3 6 3
3
LEUCADIA SUBMITTAL DATE: 07/03/18 CYCLE REVIEW# 1
18 -140 TPM /CDP FINANCE NUMBER: LEVEL: 3
Eolus LOTS lit and new SFR
1112 Eolus Ave APN: 254- 391 -38 -00
TPM/ CDP to Split one lot into two lots and build new SFR
Roy Sapa'u, City Planner
Laurie Winter, Associate Planner
Scott Vurbeff, Environmental Coordinator
"Include photographs**
Nicole Piano - Jones, Housing Management Analyst
Steve Sanders, Building Division Supervisor
Steve Sanders, Code Enforcement
Kern Berberet /Anita Pupping, Fire Marshal
Traffic Engineer
Steve Nowak, Senior Civil Engineer
Blair Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer, San Dieguito
Water District
Annette Saul, Park Operations Manager
REFERRAL DATE: 07/03/18
RETURN BY: 07/20/18
RETURN REVIEWED PROJECTS
TO PROJECT PLANNER
Dan Halverson Ext. 2711
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
_For questions /comments,.please contact Planner
Jim Knowlton, Geotechnical Consultant (Engineering)
David Van Pelt, GIS Project Manager **TMs and TPMs only **
John Ugrob, Assistant Superintendent **ROW- related Projects **
Jonathan L. Kramer, Wireless Consultant * *Please refer to EMC 9.70.080 **
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Crime Prevention Specialist Jackie Stockholm (760- 966 -3587)
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Captain John Mayron * *For Alcohol - Related Projects **
Maria Gremban, Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) /Public Notice Coordinator
A C T I O N R E
Q U E S T E D* *CONTINUE COMMENTS
ON BACK IF NECESSARY"
® Initial Review
Reviewed by:
Comments to Planner:
F1 Re- Review, Note Changes
�
Date: e1, //%1Q
T: \Templates \CD Forms \Project Review Request Form - INTERNAL Last Revised: 7/3/2018
i J ,
� \J
September 17, 2018
18 -140 TPM CDP, 254-391-38,1112 Eolus Avenue, Tourmaline Properties Inc
Planner: Dan Halverson
Project: Demolition of existing residence and construction of two new with
parcel map.
Note to Planner. These are corrections to the CDP site plan, NOT conditions of
approval. The applicant shall address these concerns and resubmit.
1. The applicant shall provide public improvements along the frontage to Eolus Avenue
to include pavement widening to 12 feet from center line and the installation of two
7'x25' (42' if tandem) pervious paver parking spaces bordered on all sides by a
6 "x16" PCC flush curb. The parkway area shall be homeowner maintained
landscaping or groundcover. The applicant shall record an Encroachment
Maintenance and Removal covenant to ensure the perpetual maintenance of the
improvements in the right -of -way.
2. This site receives stormwater runoff from a portion of Eolus Avenue. The applicant
shall capture this historic runoff and safely convey it through the site.
3. The project is located within the Leucadia Wastewater District sphere of influence,
and will need to be annexed into the District prior to serving each parcel. Show each
sewer lateral and note if a pump will be necessary.
4. The applicant shall provide stormwater quality treatment facilities to collect and treat
the runoff generated by all new and /or removed and replaced impervious surfaces.
Additionally, any increase in runoff resulting from an increase in impervious surface
shall be mitigated by sizing and designing the IMP facilities to the HMP sizing
requirements with a lower flow threshold of 0.5Q2 to ensure no net increase in cross
lot drainage. The treatment facility IMPs shall be located entirely within private
property. The cross section of the IMP facility on the Site Plan shall show 10" of
ponding. This facility shall be sized on the site plan for an effective area equal to
9.0% of the factored impervious surface area. Calculations shall be shown on the
site plan and in the hydrology study.
5. Cross lot drainage currently exists to the parcel to the west. A Hold Harmless for
Drainage Agreement will be required with the grading permit, however no increase in
cross lot drainage will be allowed.
6. The project shall provide an energy dissipation and spreading feature for the
proposed bioretention basins so that the overflow from the basins is evenly spread
across the entire length of the basin. The basin for Parcel 1 shall be conveyed to
the basin in Parcel 2 (by pipe is acceptable with private drainage easement).
7. The existing survey monuments shall be referenced on the grading plan and shall be
protected in- place. If any monument is disturbed or destroyed it shall be replaced by
a licensed land surveyor and a Corner Record or Record of Survey shall be filed with
the County prior to release of securities.
8. The overhead service lines to the building shall be constructed underground. Place
a note on all versions of the site plan.
9. The project proposes 9,973 SF of impervious surface area, which is just shy of the
PDP threshold of 10,000 SF. Special Inspection will be required verifying the
impervious surface areas by field survey prior to occupancy. Since the basins are
already sized for HMP and there are Type B soils, only a SWMA would be required.
to bring project into compliance.
COMMUNITY AREA
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LEUCADIA
18 -140
PROJECT REVIEW REQUEST
CITY OF ENCINITAS
D e v e l o p m e n t S e r v i c e s D e p a r t m e n t
5 0 5 S o u t h V u l c a n A v e n u e
E n c i n i t a s, C A 9 2 0 2 4 - 3 6 3 3
and new SFR
CYCLE REVIEW# 1
NUMBER: LEVEL: 3
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1112 Eolus Ave APN: 254- 391 -38 -00
DESCRIPTION: TPM/ CDP to Split one lot into two lots and build new SFR
To: F-1 Roy Sapa'u, City Planner REFERRAL DATE: 07/03/18
Laurie Winter, Associate Planner RETURN BY:
Scott Vurbeff, Environmental Coordinator
Include photographs"
07/20/18
,❑ Nicole Piano- Jones, Housing Management Analyst RETURN REVIEWED PROJECTS
.YX I Steve Sanders, Building Division Supervisor TO PROJECT PLANNER
h�'�eve Sanders, Code Enforcement Dan Halverson Ext. 2711
® KePri Berberet /Anita Pupping, Fire Marshal DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
QTraffic Engineer uestions /comments, plea
® Steve Nowak, Senior Civil Engineer
Blair-Knoll, �
er District
Associate Civil Engineer, San Dieguit_ $
ater District
Annette Saul, Park Operations Manager
F1 Jim Knowlton, Geotechnical Consultant (Engineering)
❑ David Van Pelt, GIS Project Manager **TMs and TPMs only"
❑ John Ugrob, Assistant Superintendent "ROW- related Projects"
❑ Jonathan L. Kramer, Wireless Consultant "Please refer to EMC 9.70.080**
❑ Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Crime Prevention Specialist Jackie Stockholm (760- 966 -3587)
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Captain John Mayron * *For Alcohol - Related Projects **
❑ Maria Gremban, Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) /Public Notice Coordinator
contact Planner
A C T I O N R E Q U E S T E D **CONTINUE COMMENTS ON BACK IF NECESSARY**
® Initial Review ❑ Re- Review, Note Changes
Reviewed by: Date:
Comments to Planner:
T: \Templates \CD Forces \Project Review Request Form — INTERNAL Last Revised: 7/3/2018
To:
COMMUNITY AREA:
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT REVIEW
E S T E D* *CONTINUE COMMENTS ON BACK IF NECESSARY'*
® Initial Review
Reviewed by:
Comments to Planner:
REQUEST
CITY OF
ENCINITAS
D e v e l o p m e n t S e r vi
I c e s
D e p a r t m e n t
505 South
Vulcan
Avenue
E n c i n i t a s,
C A
9 2 0
2 4 - 3 6 3 3
LEUCADIA SUBMITTAL DATE: 07/03/18 CYCLE REVIEW# 1
18 -140 TPM /CDP FINANCE NUMBER: LEVEL: 3
Eolus LOT Split and new SFR
1112 Eolus Ave APN: 254- 391 -38 -00
TPM/ CDP to Split one lot into two lots and build new SFR
Roy Sapa'u, City Planner
Laurie Winter, Associate Planner
Scott Vurbeff, Environmental Coordinator
"Include photographs"
Nicole Piano - Jones, Housing Management Analyst
Steve Sanders, Building Division Supervisor
Steve Sanders, Code Enforcement
Kern Berberet /Anita Pupping, Fire Marshal
Traffic Engineer
Steve Nowak, Senior Civil Engineer
Blair Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer, San Dieguito
Water District
Annette Saul, Park Operations Manager
REFERRAL DATE: 07/03/18
RETURN BY: 07/20/18
RETURN REVIEWED PROJECTS
TO PROJECT PLANNER
Dan Halverson Ext. 2711
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
_For, questions / comments, please.contact Planner -
Jim Knowlton, Geotechnical Consultant (Engineering)
David Van Pelt, GIS Project Manager **TMs and TPMs only**
John Ugrob, Assistant Superintendent "Row- related Projects"
Jonathan L. Kramer, Wireless Consultant "Please refer to EMC 9.70.080"
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Crime Prevention Specialist Jackie Stockholm (760- 966 -3587)
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Captain John Mayron * *For Alcohol - Related Projects **
Maria Gremban, Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) /Public Notice Coordinator
A C T I O N R E Q U
E S T E D* *CONTINUE COMMENTS ON BACK IF NECESSARY'*
® Initial Review
Reviewed by:
Comments to Planner:
Re- Review, Note Changes
f77, tViy / el ✓o 15 Date:
L ti
T: \Templates \CD Forms \Project Review Request Form - INTERNAL Last Revised: 7/3/2018
To:
PROJECT REVIEW
Q U E S T E D "CONTINUE COMMENTS ON
BACK IF NECESSARY"
REQUEST
CITY OF
ENCINITAS
D e v e l o p m e n t S e r v
i c e s
D e p a r t m e n t
505 South
Vulcan
Avenue
E n c I n i t a s
C A
9 2 0
2 4 - 3 6 3 3
COMMUNITY AREA: LEUCADIA SUBMITTAL DATE: 07/03/18 CYCLE REVIEW# 1
CASE NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP FINANCE NUMBER: LEVEL: 3
APPLICANT: Eolus LOT Split and new SFR
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1112 Eolus Ave APN: 254- 391 -38 -on
DESCRIPTION: TPM/ CDP to Split one lot into two lots and build new SFR
�1
Roy Sapa'u, City Planner
Laurie Winter, Associate Planner
Scott Vurbeff, Environmental Coordinator
"Include photographs"
Nicole Piano - Jones, Housing Management Analyst
Steve Sanders, Building Division Supervisor
Steve Sanders, Code Enforcement
Kern Berberet /Anita Pupping, Fire Marshal
Traffic Engineer
Steve Nowak, Senior Civil Engineer
Blair Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer, San Dieguito
Water District
Annette Saul, Park Operations Manager
REFERRAL DATE: 07/03/18
RETURN BY: 07/20/18
RETURN REVIEWED PROJECTS
TO PROJECT PLANNER
Dan Halverson Ext. 2711
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
-For. questions /comments,. please contact Planner
Jim Knowlton, Geotechnical Consultant (Engineering)
David Van Pelt, GIS Project Manager " "TMs and TPMs only ""
John Ugrob, Assistant Superintendent **ROW- related Projects"
Jonathan L. Kramer, Wireless Consultant "Please refer to EMC 9.70.080 ""
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Crime Prevention Specialist Jackie Stockholm (760- 966 -3587)
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Captain John Mayron * *For Alcohol - Related Projects **
Maria Gremban, Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) /Public Notice Coordinator
A C T I O N R E
Q U E S T E D "CONTINUE COMMENTS ON
BACK IF NECESSARY"
® Initial Review
Reviewed by:
Comments to Planner:
❑ Re- Review, Note Changes
m Ts
Date: 7�/ g
TATemplates \CD Forms \Project Review Request Form — INTERNAL Last Revised: 7/3/2076
PLANNING APPLICATION
CITY OF ENCINITAS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
www.encinitasca.gov
505 South Vulcan Avenue Application No. TP n ( P
Encinitas, California 92024 Date of Application: 6 Z6 i
(760) 633 -2710 or planninoCcilencinitasca.00v Community Area _1_g J'C <4._:,c
** Appointment Required Prior to Submittal **
PROJECT
Project Name: Eolus Ave Residences
Project Address: 1112 Eolus Ave, Encinitas CA 92024 APN: 254- 391 -38 -00
Between: Leucadia Blvd And: E. Glaucus St.
(Street) (Street)
)51 PROPERTY OWNER' O APPLICANT'
Name: Ben Ryan - Tourmaline Properties, Inc. Company Name: Tourmaline Properties, Inc.
Address: 2079 Garnet Ave.
City/State/ZIP: San Diego, CA 92109
Phone: 858 - 799 -1020 Fax:
❑ APPLICANT' (Business Owner) O AGENT O REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Address:
City/State /ZIP:
Phone:
Email: ben @tourmalineproperties.com
Company Name:
Fax: Email:
V ARCHITECT O ENGINEER O DESIGNER
Name: Deborah Shewaga Company Name: Ideal Design Systems, Inc.
Address: 1802 Hygeia Ave
City/State /ZIP: ENCINITAS, CA 92024
Phone: 760 -560 -6773 Fax:
Email: deborah @sandiegoarchitects.com
CONTACT PERSON: O Property Owner I Applicant ❑ Applicant / Agent I Representative 0 Architect / Engineer I Designer
ATTACH A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE / PROJECT TO THIS APPLICATION
I acknowledge that an application for a tentative map or tentative parcel map is not deemed received pursuant to Government Code
65920 et seq. until environmental review is complete. All other application types are not deemed received until responses from
interested agencies are received by the City.
I understand that if the project or any altemabves are located on a site which is induded on any of the Hazardous Waste and
Substances lists compiled by the Secretary for Environmental Protection pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then
a Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement must be submitted with this application. (Information that must be included in this
statement can be obtained from the Development Services Department.)
I further understand that all fees and deposits submitted with this application will be refunded only as provided for by the
ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of the application submittal.
5/18/18
Ben Ryan, President
Please Print or Type Signatory's Name and Title (if applicable)
'Property Owner is the applicant except in certain circumstance; please check with staff.
PBD \ \C: \Users\ Linda\ Desktop \Temp%Raming Application.docx Updated: 2017 -12 -28
Application No.: - `Cy Q
Application No.:
PLANNING APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT
CITY OF ENCINITAS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Design Review MUP/MIN
_X TMITPM Variance Other:
1. Project Description. (Describe proposed project. Describe what you are requesting).
PROPOSED NEW TWO STORY SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING 4091 S.F. MATH ATTACHED TWO CAR GARAGE 443 S.F., COVERED ENTRY 49 S.F., COVERED PATIO 334 S.F.
a. building Sq. ft. HOUSE '13' 4091 S.F. garage Sq.ft. HOUSE 'B' 443 S.F.
b. exterior material /color SIDING AND BOARD AND BATTEN - COLORS TED (POSSIBLY GREY AND WHITE TONES)
C. window material/color BLACK - MATERIAL TBD
d. door material/color Teo
e. roof material /color ASHPHALT SHINGLES AND METAL ROOFING - COLORS IN MEDIUM TO DARK GREY TONES
f Landscaping Percentage LOT'B': 8035 S.F./ 15.490 S.F .= 52%
g. Standards:
DENSITY
CODE REQUIREMENTS
PROJECT
Density Range
Mid -Range
MAX, 3 UNITS PER ACRE
MID RANGE 2.5 UNITS
2 UNITS .69 ACRE
Net lot area
14500 S.F.
LOT'B'-15490 S.F.
Lot Width
80 FEET
LOT'B' -100 FT.
Cul-de -sac lot width
N/A
Panhandle lot width
20 FEET
20 FT
Lot Depth
100 FEET
LOT'S' 116.66 FT
Front Yard Setback
25 FEET
LOTS' 25' -3"
Interior Side Yard Setback
10 FEET
Exterior Side Yard Setback
N/A
Rear Yard Setback
25 FEET
LOT'B' 39-7'
Lot Coverage
.35
LOT'B' .17
Building Height
22 FEET/ 26 FEET
LOT'S' 21' -6'/ 24' -10'
Off- Street Parking
3 SPACES
2INTERIOR SPACES, 1 EXTERIOR SPACE
FAR
N/A
PBD11T:1APPLICATIONS AND FORMSWiginalstPlanning Applkation.doc Updated: 2015-09-08
Application No.:
Community Area LEUCADIA State Coastal Zone? Ig Yes ❑ No
Number of Proposed Residential Units: Attached _ Detached
Number of Lots
Related Case?
Acres: Gross15,490 S.F. Net LOT V -15490 S.F.
❑ Yes )I No If yes, provide previous Case No.
Are there any slopes of a 25% or greater gradient or bluffs on the site? ❑ Yes P1 No
2. Existing Conditions. (Describe the existing conditions of the site: i.e., topography,
road /alley conditions, access, vegetation, structures, fencing, lot size, drainage and the like).
THE EXISTING LOT IS LARGE AND RFCTANrt11 AR I OCATFD ON THE WEST SIDE OF FOLUS
THERE IS CURRENTLY AN OLDER ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOME WITH ATTACHED
GARAGE AND DETACHED SHED ON THE PROPERTY. THE LOT SLOPES /DRAINES FROM EAST
TO WEST WITH AVERAGE LOT SLOPE OF LESS THAN 10 %.. THE PROPERTY HAS NOT BEEN
MAINTAINED AND CONSTAINS SOME OVERGROWN LAWN, WEEDS AND A VARIETY OF FRUIT AND
OTHER TREES THAT ARE GENERALLY IN POOR HEATHLY DUE TO NEGLECT.
THE PROPERTY HAS SOME FORM OF FENCING ON ALL SIDES.
THE FENCE ON THE SOUTH SIDE IS A NEWER WOOD FENCE INSTALLED BY THE SINGLE FAMILY
DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS RECENTLY BUILT, THE FENCE TO THE WEST IS AN OLDER WOOD FENCE.
THE PROPERTY CONTAINS A NUMBER OF FENCES OR PORTIONS OF FENCES MADE OUT
VARYING MATERIALS THAT WILL BE REMOVED. THE FENCE TO THE NORTH IS A COMBINATION
METAL AND WOOD FENCE IN A STATE OF DISREPAIR. THE LOT AND PARKING IS ACCESSED
DIRECTLY OFF OF EOLUS VIA AN EXISTING PAVED DRIVEWAY. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY
ON SEPTIC, HOWEVER THERE IS SEWER CURRENTLY RUN TO THE MID POI
3. Surrounding Conditions. (Describe the surrounding conditions: i.e., existing structures
and relationship to project, # of units, lot sizes, vehicular access, topography, use type
and the like).
THE PPQPFRTV TQ THE Cf11 ITH UR A NEWER SIN! oLE FAMILY DE-1/0 OPMENT WITH A
CUL -DE -SAC AND 4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS A
SINGLF FAMILY HOME ON WHAT APPEARS TO RF A PANHANnLF LOT
TO THE NORTH EAST IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS
FROM EOLUS. ON THE NORTH WEST CORNER APPEARS TO BE VACANT LOT WITH ACCESS
FROM A PRIVATE ROAD OR EASEMENT TO THE NORTH. TO THE EAST IS A SINGLE FAMILY
HOME AND A VACANT LOT BOTH WITH DIRECT ACCESS FROM EOLUS.
ALL BOARDING PROPERTIES ARE ZONED R -3 RESIDENTIAL WITH R8 TWO BLOCKS
TO THE WEST. THE PROPERTIES ALL TEND TO SLOPE FROM EAST TO WEST WITH
PBD \ \T \APPLICATIONS AND FORMSWiginalsRanning Application.doc Updated: 2015 -09-08
Application No.: /L /y0
General Plan Zoning Existing
Designation Designation Use
Subject Parcel: RESIDENTIAL 3 R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
North: RESIDENTIAL 3 R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
South: RESIDENTIAL 3 R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
East: RESIDENTIAL 3 R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
West: RESIDENTIAL 3 R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
4. Project/parcel history. (Describe any past actions taken on this site or project or any other actions
taken on development of the site.)
THIS PROPERTY CONTAINS AN EXISTING SFD WITH ATTACHED GARAGE
CONSTRUCTED IN 1962. NO OTHER PAST ACTIONS OR DEVELOPMENTS
THAT WE ARE AWARE OF HAVE TAKEN PLACE ON THIS SITE.
PBMTWPLICATIONS AND FORMS\odginalsnanning Application.doc Updated: 201509 -08
Application No.: % U -- / YU
*5. Project Design. (Describe the design of the project and how it relates to the subject property and
adjacent properties and uses).
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH
ATTACHED GARAGE
THIS PROPOSAL REFLECTS THE SIZF-, L16E, bUALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF ALL
THE ADJACENT DEVELOPED PARCELS.
*6. View Preservation. (Describe what views are being maintained on adjacent properties and those
that may be impacted by this project.)
IN ADDITION, THE PROJECT PROPOSES A MUCH LOWER LOT COVERAGE THAN IS ALLOWED
BY THE CURRENT ZONING. THIS PROVIDES A LARGE AREA OF BOTH LOTS THAT WILL NOT
BE BUILT ON.
NOTE: Items with an asterisk may not be appropriate for all applications. If you have questions
regarding applicability to your project, please discuss with Planning Department staff.
P8D11T:WPPLICATI0NS AND FORMSIodginalsTlanning Application.doc Updated: 201509 -08
Application No.: ` /Y0
CITY OF ENCINITAS D
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH
WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION, AND ALL
OTHER OFFICIAL BODIES.
The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
Tourmaline Properties, Inc.
List the names of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved.
Tourmaline Properties, Inc.
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning
more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
Ben Ryan
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a non - profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving
as director of the non - profit organization as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions,
Committees, and Council within the past twelve months? ❑ Yes X No If yes, please indicate person(s).
PERSON is defined as: "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization,
corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city, municipality, district or other
political subdivision, or any group or combination acting as a unit."
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.)
5/18/18
Signature of Applicant Date
Ben Ryan, President
Print or type name of applicant
PBD \\T: APPLICATIONS AND FORMSWginals\Planning Application.doc Updated: 2015 -09-08
L
To:
PROJECT REVIEW
BACK IF NECESSARY"
® Initial Review Re- Review, Note Changes
Reviewed by: i.D
Comments to Planner:
REQUEST
CITY OF
ENCINITAS
5.3
a ,
D e v e l o p m e n t S e r v
i c e s
D e p a r t m e n t
5 0 5 S o u t h
V u
l c a n
A v e n u e
E n c i n i t a s,
C A
9 2 0
2 4 - 3 6 3 3
COMMUNITY AREA: LEUCADIA SUBMITTAL DATE: 07/03/18 CYCLE REVIEW# 1
CASE NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP FINANCE NUMBER: LEVEL: 3
APPLICANT: Eolus LOTS lit and new SFR
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1112 Eolus Ave APN: 254- 391 -38 -00
DESCRIPTION: TPM/ CDP to Split one lot into two lots and build new SFR
/1
Roy Sapa'u, City Planner
Laurie Winter, Associate Planner
Scott Vurbeff, Environmental Coordinator
. *Include photographs"
Nicole Piano - Jones, Housing Management Analyst
Steve Sanders, Building Division Supervisor
Steve Sanders, Code Enforcement
Kerri Berberet /Anita Pupping, Fire Marshal
Traffic Engineer
Steve Nowak, Senior Civil Engineer
Blair Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer, San Dieguito
Water District
Annette Saul, Park Operations Manager
REFERRAL DATE: 07/03/18
RETURN BY: 07/20/18
RETURN REVIEWED PROJECTS
TO PROJECT PLANNER
Dan Halverson Ext. 2711
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
For questions /comments,_ please contact. Planner
Jim Knowlton, Geotechnical Consultant (Engineering)
David Van Pelt, GIS Project Manager * *TMs and TPMs only **
John Ugrob, Assistant Superintendent * *ROW- related Projects**
Jonathan L. Kramer, Wireless Consultant "Please refer to EMC 9.70.080 **
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Crime Prevention Specialist Jackie Stockholm (760- 966 -3587)
Sheriff's Office (Encinitas): Captain John Mayron * *For Alcohol - Related Projects **
Maria Gremban, Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) /Public Notice Coordinator
A C T I O N R E Q U E S T E D "CONTINUE COMMENTS ON
BACK IF NECESSARY"
® Initial Review Re- Review, Note Changes
Reviewed by: i.D
Comments to Planner:
/
Date:
5.3
a ,
T: \Templates \CD Forms \Project Review Request Form - INTERNAL Last Revised: 7/3/2018
PLANNING APPLICATION
CITY OF ENCINITAS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
www. encin Itasca. cloy
505 South Vulcan Avenue Application No. f f — l cl u TPY\ ( i
Encinitas, California 92024 Date of Application:
(760) 633 -2710 or plannino(cDencinitasca.cov Community Area .
** Appointment Required Prior to Submittal **
PROJECT
Project Name: Eolus Ave Residences
Project Address: 1112 Eolus Ave, Encinitas CA 92024 APN: 254 - 391 -38 -00
Between:
Leucadia Blvd And: E. Glaucus St.
PROPERTY OWNER' O APPLICANT'
Name: Ben Ryan - Tourmaline Properties, Inc. Company Name: Tourmaline Properties, Inc.
Address: 2079 Garnet Ave.
City/State/ZIP: San Diego, CA 92109
Phone: 858- 799 -1020 Fax:
❑ APPLICANT' (Business Owner) ❑ AGENT O REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Address:
City/State /ZIP:
Phone:
Fax:
ARCHITECT ❑ ENGINEER ❑ DESIGNER
Email: ben @tourmalineproperties.com
Company Name:
Name: Deborah Shewaga Company Name: Ideal Design Systems, Inc.
Address: 1802 Hygeia Ave
City/State /ZIP: ENCINITAS, CA 92024
Phone: 760 - 560 -6773 Fax: Email: deborah@sandiegoarchitects.com
CONTACT PERSON: 0 Property Owner / Applicant O Applicant I Agent / Representative X Architect / Engineer I Designer
ATTACH A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE / PROJECT TO THIS APPLICATION
I acknowledge that an application for a tentative map or tentative parcel map is not deemed received pursuant to Govemment Code
65920 at seq. until environmental review is complete. All other application types are not deemed received until responses from
interested agencies are received by the City.
I understand that if the project or any altematives are located on a site which is included on any of the Hazardous Waste and
Substances lists compiled by the Secretary for Environmental Protection pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then
a Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement must be submitted with this application. (Information that must be included in this
statement can be obtained from the Development Services Department.)
I further understand that all fees and deposits submitted with this application will be refunded only as provided for by the
ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of the application submittal.
UGC 5 /18 /18
Signature, Owner or Authorized Agent (Attach letter of authorization) Date
Ben Ryan, President
Please Print or Type Signatorys Name and Title (if applicable)
'Property Owner is the applicant except in certain circumstance; please check with staff.
PBD \ \C: \Users\ Linda\ Desktop \Temp \Planning Application.docx Updated: 2017 -12 -28
Application No.:�(0
Application No.:
PLANNING APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT
CITY OF ENCINITAS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Design Review MUP/MIN ^
_K TM/TPM Variance Other: C— f� !IJ
Project Description. (Describe proposed project. Describe what you are requesting).
FAMILY DWELLING 4091 S.F. WITH ATTACHED TWO CAR GARAGE 443 S.F., COVERED ENTRY 49 S.F., COVERED PATIO 334 S.F.
a. building sq. ft. HOUSE -5- 4091 S.F. garage sci t. HOUSE'B' 443 S.F.
b. exterior material /color SIDING AND BOARD AND BATTEN - COLORS TBD (POSSIBLY GREY AND WHITE TONES)
C. window material/color BLACK - MATERIAL TBD
d. door material/color Teo
e. roof material /color ASHPHALT SHINGLES AND METAL ROOFING - COLORS IN MEDIUM TO DARK GREY
f Landscaping Percentage LOT'B': 8035 S.F./ 15.490 S.F .= 52%
g. Standards:
DENSITY
CODE REQUIREMENTS
PROJECT
Density Range
Mid -Range
MAX. 3 UNITS PER ACRE
MID RANGE 2.5 UNITS
2 UNITS .69 ACRE
Net lot area
14500 S.F.
LOT'B'-15490 S.F.
Lot Width
80 FEET
LOT'B'-I 00 FT.
Cul -de -sac lot width
N/A
Panhandle lot width _
20 FEET
20 FT
Lot Depth
100 FEET
LOT'B' 118.66 FT
Front Yard Setback
25 FEET
LOT'B' 25' -3"
Interior Side Yard Setback
10 FEET
Exterior Side Yard Setback
N/A
Rear Yard Setback
25 FEET
LOT'B' 39' -7"
Lot Coverage
.35
LOT'B' .17
Building Height
22 FEET/ 26 FEET
I LOT '8'21'-6"/ 24' -10°
Off- Street Parking
3 SPACES
2INTERIOR SPACES, 1 EXTERIOR SPACE
FAR
N/A
PBD \ \T\APPLICATIONS AND FORMSWnginalslPlanning Application.doc Updated: 2015-09-08
Application No.: P/ — /` o
Community Area LEUCADIA State Coastal Zone? X Yes ❑ No
Number of Proposed Residential Units: Attached Detached 1
Number of Lots 1 Acres: Grosse 5,490 S.F. Net LOT'B' -15490 S.F.
Related Case ?: ❑ Yes X No If yes, provide previous Case No.
Are there any slopes of a 25% or greater gradient or bluffs on the site? ❑ Yes N No
2. Existing Conditions. (Describe the existing conditions of the site: i.e., topography,
road /alley conditions, access, vegetation, structures, fencing, lot size, drainage and the like).
THE FXI3TINr, I OT M I ARC.F AND RFCTANC;LILAR I OCATFD ON THE WFRT SIDF OF FCII I IS
THERE IS CURRENTLY AN OLDER ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY HOME WITH ATTACHED
GARAGE AND DETACHED SHED ON THE PROPERTY. THE LOT SLOPES /DRAINES FROM EAST
TO WEST WITH AVERAGE LOT SLOPE OF LESS THAN 10 %.. THE PROPERTY HAS NOT BEEN
MAINTAINED AND CONSTAINS SOME OVERGROWN LAWN, WEEDS AND A VARIETY OF FRUIT AND
OTHER TREES THAT ARE GENERALLY IN POOR HEATHLY DUE TO NEGLECT.
THE PROPERTY HAS SOME FORM OF FENCING ON ALL SIDES.
THE FENCE ON THE SOUTH SIDE IS A NEWER WOOD FENCE INSTALLED BY THE SINGLE FAMILY
DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS RECENTLY B I T THE FENCE TO THE T IS AN OLDER WOOD FENCE.
THE PROPERTY CONTAINS A NUMBER OF FENCES OR PORTIONS OF FENCES MADE OUT
VARYING MATERIALS THAT WILL BE REMOVED. THE FENCE TO THE NORTH IS A COMBINATION
METAL AND WOOD FENCE IN A STATE OF DISREPAIR. THE LOT AND PARKING IS ACCESSED
DIRECTLY OFF OF EOLUS VIA AN EXISTING PAVED DRIVEWAY. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY
ON SEPTIC, HOWEVER THERE IS SEWER CURRENTLY RUN TO THE MID POINT.
3. Surrounding Conditions. (Describe the surrounding conditions: i.e., existing structures
and relationship to project, # of units, lot sizes, vehicular access, topography, use type
and the like).
THE PROPERTY 10 THE SLIUTH IS A NEWER SINGLE EARAII V r1EVF 'OPAAFNT \A /ITN A
CUL -DE -SAC AND 4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS A
SING4 F FAMILY HOME ON WHAT APPEARS TO BF A PANHANDLE LOT
TO THE NORTH EAST IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCESS
FROM EOLUS. ON THE NORTH WEST CORNER APPEARS TO BE VACANT LOT WITH ACCESS
FROM A PRIVATE ROAD OR EASEMENT TO THE NORTH. TO THE EAST IS A SINGLE FAMILY
HOME AND A VACANT LOT BOTH WITH DIRECT ACCESS FROM EOLUS.
ALL BOARDING PROPERTIES ARE ZONED R -3 RESIDENTIAL WITH R8 TWO BLOCKS
TO THE WEST. THE PROPERTIES ALL TEND TO SLOPE FROM EAST TO WEST WITH
PBMMAPPLICATIONS AND FORMS \o6ginals\Planning Application.doc Updated: 2015-09 -08
Subject Parcel:
North:
South:
East:
Application No.:
General Plan Zoning Existing
Designation Designation Use
RESIDENTIAL 3 R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL 3
R3
RESIDENTIAL 3
R3
RESIDENTIAL 3
R3
West: RESIDENTIAL 3
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
4. Project/parcel history. (Describe any past actions taken on this site or project or any other actions
taken on development of the site.)
THIS PROPERTY CONTAINS AN EXISTING SFD WITH ATTACHED GARAGE
CONSTRUCTED IN 1962. NO OTHER PAST ACTIONS R DEVELOPMENTS
THAT WE ARE AWARE OF HAVE TAKEN PLACE ON THIS SITE.
PSMT:IAPPLICATIONS AND FORMMonginalslPlanning Application.doc Updated: 2015-09-08
Application No.: /d — / `/U
'5. Project Design. (Describe the design of the project and how it relates to the subject property and
adjacent properties and uses).
THE PROJECT DESIGN
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH
ATTACHED GARAGE
THIS PROPOSAL REFLECTS THE SIZE, USE, SCALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF ALL
THE ADJACENT DEVELOPED PARCELS.
'6. View Preservation. (Describe what views are being maintained on adjacent properties and those
that may be impacted by this project.)
THFRF ARF NC) APPARENT VIEWS FRC)M THIS PROPFRTY TO THE rIr-FAN THF VIFWq
FROM THE SECOND STORY ARE ONLY OF NEIGHBORING SOUTH, NORTH AND WEST
PROPERTIES, WITH THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE DOWNWARD SLOPE OF EOLUS
THE DEVELOPMENTS ON THE EAST SIDE OF EOLUS SIT MUCH HIGHER IN ELEVATION
AND THEREFOR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PARCEL SHOULD NOT AFFECT THEIR VIEWS.
IN ADDITION, THE PROJECT PROPOSES A MUCH LOWER LOT COVERAGE THAN IS ALLOWED
BY THE CURRENT ZONING. THIS PROVIDES A LARGE AREA OF BOTH LOTS THAT WILL NOT
NOTE: Items with an asterisk may not be appropriate for all applications. If you have questions
regarding applicability to your project, please discuss with Planning Department staff.
PBMT: APPLICATIONS AND FORMStonginalsOanning Application.doc Updated: 2015 -09-08
Application No.: 11"0 A
CITY OF ENCINITAS D
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH
WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION, AND ALL
OTHER OFFICIAL BODIES.
The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
Tourmaline Properties, Inc.
List the names of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved.
Tourmaline Properties, Inc.
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning
more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
Ben Ryan
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a non - profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving
as director of the non - profit organization as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions,
Committees, and Council within the past twelve months? ❑ Yes X No If yes, please indicate person(s).
PERSON is defined as: "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization,
corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city, municipality, district or other
political subdivision, or any group or combination acting as a unit."
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.)
5/18/18
Signature of Applicant Date
Ben Ryan, President
Print or type name of:
PGMT:WPLICATIONS AND FORMSIodginalslPlanning Application.doc Updated: 2015 -09-08
�,egal Newspaper by the Superior Court
of San Diego County.
� correspondence regarding public
notice advertising to:
The Coast News
P.O. Box 23250
Encinitas, CA 92023
(760) 436 -9737
If ®f Publication
'ATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
IOUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I of the United States and a resident of the
age of eighteen years, and not a party to or
entitled matter.
clerk of the printer of The Coast News, a
.I published weekly and which newspaper has
;paper of general circulation for the cities of
I Mar, Solana Beach. Encinitas /Cardiff.
,vista. San Marcos. Escondido, the County of
•)umv Judicial District by the Superior Court
mia, County of San Diego (8/4/94, #677114.
hat the notice, of which the annexed is a
n published in, each regular and entire issue
rid not in any supplement thereof on the
r
lanuary 18.2019
penalty of perjury that the
ie and correct. Executed at
!y of San Diego, State of
18th of January 2019.
rk of th Printer
C)�-A
Space above for County Clerk's Filing Stamp
- - CITY OF ENCINITAS f
i DEVELOPMENTSERVICESDEPARTMENT
505 S. Vulcan Avenue, EoumtiM CA 92024
Phone (760)63327101 Email Dlamim¢0emm�ttas® ¢ov
_ - I Web. www.evonimc®.eov - I
i Ctty 13x11 Homa Monday clod "ugh Fndny 7:OO:A113 to 6:00 PM 1
I }Closed alternate Fridays (1 /1k 1/25; etc:1 and Monday,•3annarydl; 2019
s )
.1! ` fa observanceof Martin Luttier Kiu&df. Ilay
t'
1 % THE CITY OFENCINITAS {IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY :PUBLIC ENTITY AND
S,
D
�7 , i--Ji
s'
It
S'
:onsioer a
an existin
fat review puisuant'tn` the
line's.
4633 -2681 or jdichosoOen
E NUMBER: 18 -140 TPib .
iurmaline properties; Inc:` t
54- 39110); PROJECT 'DE
Parcel Mapend Coastal
CONTACT: Dan Halverson, Associate Planner. 960. 633 -2711 tir. d1;51ve'r+
RAT THE iNUBL➢HEARDYG TO BE HELD AT 5:00 PM ON TUESDAY,`,
FILE COMMENTS RECEIVED
action is tnken'ou the aplieal.
are:lacated avithm the Coestal Zoae and require the - issuanteoLa'
Development'PeriiutiOnithc ; ab`ove items, the ection'ofihe Develop
u+ecto5'or City Coimnl through m appeal, may not be appealed to the
al Commission.
r poor to the date and Time of the'determmation '.
ON- 10.1Ck
CITY OF ENCINITAS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, CA 92024
Phone: (760) 633 -2710 j Email: planning @encinitasca.gov I Web: www.encinitasca.gov
City Hall Hours: Monday through Friday 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM
Closed alternate Fridays & Holidays (1/11, 1125 etc. & 1/21 Martin Luther King, Jr. Day)
NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND PENDING ACTION ON AN
ADMINISTRATIVE APPLICATION AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PUBLIC HEARING: TUESDAY, JANUARY 22. 2019 AT 5:00 P.M., TO BE HELD AT THE CITY OF
ENCINITAS COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 505 SOUTH VULCAN AVE, ENCINITAS
THE CITY OF ENCINITAS IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY PUBLIC ENTITY AND DOES NOT
DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF RACE, COLOR, ETHNIC ORIGIN, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEX,
RELIGION, VETERANS STATUS OR PHYSICAL OR MENTAL DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR
THE PROVISION OF SERVICE. IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES
ACT AND SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973, IF YOU NEED SPECIAL
ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THESE MEETINGS, PLEASE CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT (760) 633 -2710.
PROJECT NAME: Ryan Tentative Parcel Map; CASE NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP; FILING DATE:
June 6, 2018; APPLICANT: Tourmaline Properties, Inc. — Ben Ryan; LOCATION: 1112 Eolus Avenue
(APN 254 - 391 -10); PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Public hearing to consider a Tentative Parcel Map and
Coastal Development Permit to demolish an existing single - family residence, subdivide one existing lot
into two new legal lots, and construct a new single - family residence with attached garage on Parcel 1.
The subject property is located in the Residential 3 Zone (R -3) and the Coastal Overlay Zone.;
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The project has been determined to be exempt from environmental
review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
STAFF CONTACT: Dan Halverson, Associate Planner: 760 - 633 -2711 or dhalverson @encinitasca.qov
PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD AT 5:00 PM ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 22,
2019, ANY INTERESTED PERSON MAY REVIEW THE APPLICATION AND PRESENT
TESTIMONY, ORALLY OR IN WRITING, TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
WRITTEN TESTIMONY IS PREFERRED IN ORDER TO HAVE A RECORD OF THE COMMENTS
RECEIVED.
If additional information is not required, the Development Services Department will render a
determination on the application, pursuant to Section 2.28.090 of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code,
after the close of the review period. An Appeal of the Department's determination accompanied by the
appropriate filing fee may be filed within 10- calendar days from the date of the determination.
Appeals will be considered by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code. Any
filing of an appeal will suspend this action as well as any processing of permits in reliance in
accordance with Encinitas Municipal Code Section 1.12.020(D)(1) until such time as an action is taken
on the appeal.
The above item is located within the Coastal Zone and requires the issuance of a regular
Coastal Development Permit. The action of the Development Services Director, or City Council
through an appeal, may not be appealed to the California Coastal Commission.
Under California Government Code Sec. 65009, if you challenge the nature of the proposed action in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised regarding the matter
described in this notice or written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the date and time
of the determination.
CASE NO. 18 -140 TPM /CDP
RYAN SUBDIVISION (APN 254 - 391 -10)
1
i
1
EOLUS RE5I12ENCES
CASE # 18 -140 TPM /GDP
1112 EOLU5 AVE. ENCINIT65 CA. 92024
REPORT OF CITIZENS MEETING ON JULY 25, 2015
A Citizens' Participation Meeting was held on Saturday, July 25, 2018 at 10am at the above
project site. A brief presentation of the proposed lot subdivision and proposed residences
was made by the architect. Presentation material included full sized drawings of the proposed
grading plan and site sections along with full sized drawings of both proposed residences
were displayed on solid boards for easy viewing. 11" x 17' copies of the architectural
drawings for both homes where made available for neighbors to take with them and refer to
during and after the presentation.
Approximately 15 Neighbors attended the meeting.
1. Techninues used to notifu and involve the public:
A letter and vicinity map notify all property owners and occupants with 500 feet of the
project was mailed on July 12, 2015. Of the 90 notices mailed out, 2 were returned. As
undeliverable. 45 min. Prior to the start of the meeting signs were posted along the street at
the driveway notifying neighbors of the meeting.
2. Concerns, issues and problems raised by neighbors at meeting and response:
a. Two local Architects who live in the area, commented on the architecture of
the homes. They felt that Leucadia is heading toward more modern homes and
felt the style of the proposed homes was "dated ". Although style is subjective
the architect directly across the street was hoping to look down on an
interesting modern home. My response was to acknowledge their comment and
concern, and pass on their comments to the owner. The adjacent property
owner to the south however said that they really liked the style of the homes
presented.
b. A question was asked on how we were going to deal with the sewer to the
back lot as it would require a pump. If we use a pump what is our back up plan
if the power goes out? My response was to note that we have started to look
into sewer but need to look into it further and most likely a small generator or
other source of back up power may be need for the pump.
c. The Architect across the street who had recently extended the sewer main
asked if we had started the process for extending the sewer line on Eolus
north. He mentioned when he went through the process it took them around a
year for the annexing process and suggested we look into that as soon as
possible. My response to thank him for the information and said I would pass
on this information to the owners and we will look into getting the process
started.
Mai
MC VRR 0 UVVC .®
paa 922- PM1760
7
Email: detonh@sndlseowhkics.com WRif: ' wsardiegaachitoctsx onrr--Nr:4r�nl�;mrvi
fiM /.J
d. The neighbors to the south, south west and west asked for the setbacks
from the property lines to proposed residence. I gave the actual set back
numbers to them and explained that the houses are sitting further away from
their property line than the minimum setbacks required for by the city and that
the sitting of these buildings was intentional to allow for more space between
neighboring homes.
e. The south, south west neighbors asked why the pan handle driveway was not
placed on the south side instead of the north side of the property. I explained
that the house on the north side looked very close to our property line and
that the driveway in that location provided a greater buffer between them and
the proposed home. In addition, the access to the back lot made more sense
on the north side because the grade difference from the road onto the
property was more gentle in that location.
f. The south neighbors asked what windows would be overlooking their
—pr_oper_ty._I- explained _that_the_only_windows_on_ the- south - face -on- the- upper-
floor were bathroom windows and two high windows in the master bedroom.
g. Many of the neighbors asked if we are keeping the trees on the property. I
mentioned that we had walked the property with a landscape architect who felt
that many of the trees had not been cared for and not worth keeping. I
mentioned that we are keeping two trees in total and all the others would be
removed. The south west neighbors were concerned about the number of
skunks and rats around due to the fruit trees. I mentioned the fruit trees will
be removed. They asked if they could be maintained in the interim to reduce
animals in the area. I suggested I would discuss this with the owners and that I
had seen some yard cleanup had been done already on the site.
In. One neighbor wrote on a comment sheet that they are concerned about the
construction dust and debris and asked if it can be contained. 5uggesting a
30 ft plastic tarp be utilized. Since this was not asked to me directly I could
not respond, however I will pass this concern onto the owners.
I. A question was asked about the grading on the site. I responded by showing
the a site section showing existing and proposed grades and that both homes
were design to follow the current site grading as much as possible to minimize
cut and fill.
j. The north neighbor asked if we would be putting a solid wall up on the north
property line. I responded that there will be a small low retaining wall adjacent
to their property when the driveway comes off Eolus and that we would be
installing a wood fence along that side and not any solid walls.
2
AT o�����a�
6=hft gt&cof , ebsit6s, CA 92726 - Fli chitlmtmn
Email: dehonh®sanUlegoarchtectacom WehslEe: mvstsandiegoarMifecta.com
('1rA(IZri/,;;krNn nrVnl.J
k. A neighbor who has lived in the area for 50 years and owns 4 properties
on this same block on Eolus stated that the lot we are developing on was an
Avocado farm many years ago and as a result the soil on the property is a very
rich growing soil. 5he suggested that during construction the owners be
careful to retain and re -use the top soil.
I. A number of neighbors asked when the construction would begin. I stated
that we estimate approximately one year from the submittal in .tune.
m. A number of the adjacent property owners who are on septic asked if there
was a way to get sewer to their properties while we are developing our
property. I suggested that they contact Leucadia wastewater district and
discuss with them options that may be available to them. I also mentioned that I
will make a call to them to discuss our development and if there is any way to
that the north, North West and west properties could have sewer extended to
them.
n. The property owners no the south east across on Eolus were concerned
that their ocean view may be compromised with our development. I stated that
we are building to the allowable building heights and roof slope is low at 5:12.
The asked me to come to their property to review view impact. As we looked
at their view and the proposed location of the new structures we propose we
all concluded that it would not impact their view.
o. Questions were asked about the runoff on the site and the proposed
material for the panhandle driveway. My response was that the panhandle
driveway would be pervious pavers and that both lots had been designed to
direct their surface runoff towards large bio retention planters located . at the
back of each lot.
p. auestions were asked about the communal mailbox that is located at the
proposed location of the new panhandle driveway. I asked for feedback on a
preferred location. The neighbors to the north and east both expressed that
they did not want it in front of their homes. I suggested a location to the
south of the panhandle driveway between our two proposed driveways. I did
not hear any objection to this proposed location.
The meeting lasted just over 1.5 hours and was an open dialogue between
neighbors and the architect. Although many questions were asked and
answered, we felt that the concerns for the development were few and had
been addressed at this meeting.
3
i
PhnOAoam
1602 Hya ds Aw, Encinitas, CA B312t
Email: deoolahawdYoolath adamm WCOslte: WW iwWleaoaldbcft.com
Sign -In -Sheet
Project: 1112 EOLUS AVE, ENCINITAS, CA 92024
July 28, 2018 Case #: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
Printed Name
Address
Signatur
I received
Letter in mail
I did not
received
Letter in mail
llll
Mrt a VV
if6i ras
ID
w-7 Coin U\N1'
[
1p f
r/rs' 4 6Y L-.,
ossA�-,,I., Z, i i,
T/
c/
f� n _
i
1882 HygYt An, EntlnRp; G1 82021 • Ph 700.6600713 �
a
Email: dellma Stan0kgoarchbcp.com Wisme: Wgw.wMlgpatdlgeM.com
July 28, 2018
Comments
Project: 1112 EOLUS AVE, ENCINITAS, Cry 92024
Case #: 15 -140 TPM /GDP
1.Do the documents and presentation clearly identify the scope of the
project? (YJN
if no, please describe areas requiring clarification.
2. Do you have any other issues or concerns requiring further review?
Y�1
/r please explain.
Name (please print)
Address
Additional Comments:
&L WOU L"off A-12,
JCL %y ali tv
I
7too
.,«. aior
July 28, 2018
Comments
Project: 1112 EOLUS A\/E, ENCINITAS, Cie g2O24
Case #: 18 -140 TPM /GDP
1.Do the documents and presentation clearly identify the scope of the
project? Y/N
If no, please describe areas requiring clarification.
2. Do you have any other issues or concerns requiring further review?
Y/N
If yes, please explain.
Name (please print)
1-94
Address ,
Additional Comments:
I
IBM Hyyela Aw, Entlnta G82M- .Ph7SOM M t
Email: tlaEOrahMsan0rogoan:hRatta tom WeWlfe wml.aantllgperthlbAa.com
July 28, 2018
Comments
Project: 1112 EOLUS A\/E, ENCINITAS, Cie g2O24
Case #: 18 -140 TPM /GDP
1.Do the documents and presentation clearly identify the scope of the
project? Y/N
If no, please describe areas requiring clarification.
2. Do you have any other issues or concerns requiring further review?
Y/N
If yes, please explain.
Name (please print)
1-94
Address ,
Additional Comments:
I
July 28, 2018
IBMHAdeAW, Endntn;CA$272e- Ph?$OM04M
Email: EeOOnh9exlolelimheoxb.00m WOOF: wW.emEleportlilbdsxom
Comments
Project: 1112 EOLUS AVE, ENCINITA5, CA 92024
Case #: 15 -140 TPM /GDP
1.Do the docu ents and presentation clearly identify the scope of the
project? Y.
If no, please describe areas requiring clarification.
2. Do you have any other issues or concerns requiring further review?
Y/N
If yes, please explain.
ry0 iC FvAr f� jz IKiet r�l{ �c 5�l K i;�• ";('rG�v��,�°,J���
Name (please print)
Address
( NO -&-ya- _ -Z o:'� -- �t .
Additional Comments:
July 28, 2018
� 1
18@ HYyela Ave, EndnM, G 92021- Ph N000d773
Email tleoomh2WdMgo=hkfttawm WaWilm wY szxllgoerdilhcts.tom
Comments
Project: 1112 EOLUS AVE, ENCINITA 5, CA 92024
Case #: 15 -140 TPM /GDP
1.Do the documents and presentation clearly identify the scope of the
project? Y/N 'A-fn
If no, please de9�ribe areas requiring clarification.
2. Do you have any other issues or concerns requiring further review?
Y/R7, Zvi %
If yes, please explain.
M
Address
Additional comments:
-r
a aEMMM 0 09MM&WIl,,le w-1
1802 H}gela Ave; Encinitas, CA 98121 Fh 760.5666777
Email: debora @saidiegoarchiects.com Websde: m .samlleparchftctsxom
1- 11':K?f1�.�M fJ MCJ�JI7 M.lJ nMe=D
June 11, 2018
RE: NEIGHBORHOOD MEEETING:
Proposed Development at 1112 Eolus Ave, Encinitas, CA 92024
Ben Ryan, President of Tourmaline Properties Inc. current owner of the property at 1112 Eolus Avenue and
Deborah Shewaga Principal Architect — Ideal Design Systems, Inc. would like to invite you to attend a
neighborhood meeting for Case number 18 -140 TPM /CDP.
This project is for a Tentative Parcel Map and Coastal Development Permit. The existing site is one large
29,900 s.f. lot, APN 254 -39- 110- OO.The site is zoned R -3 and is within the Special Study, ScenicNisual
Corridor, and Coastal overlay zones.
Proposed Development:
We are proposing the subdivision of one large parcel into two separate legal lots as allowed per R3 zoning. On
each new lot we propose the construction of a 2 story single family residence with attached garage.
Specifically, we are proposing the following:
- Demolition of the existing residence, attached garage, and shed (per 18 -141 CDP).
- Subdivision of the existing 29,990 s.f. lot into two separate legal lots
-On (easterly) lot 'A' - proposed lot with gross /net area of 14,500 s.f. with a new two story 4049 s.f.
single family residence.
-On (westerly) lot 'B' - proposed a panhandle (lane access) on the north side of the property, a
gross /net lot area of 15,490 s.f. with a new two story 4091 s.f. single family residence (per 18 -141
CDP).
Design Approach:
The overall site planning approach was to create two lots with ample usable yard space. Both homes sit more
centrally on their lots allowing for greater separation from house to property line. The homes are designed in a
style of contemporary farmhouse, reflecting on the eclectic nature of housing in the area. The massing of each
home is broken up by creating one and two story areas. Furthermore, the use of a combination of metal and
composite roofing, and varying wall finishes of siding and board and batten create two distinct homes that we
believe will integrate and enhance the streetscape along Eolus.
General Existing Conditions:
The existing site gently slopes from East to West with an average lot slope of approximately 7 %. Present
access to the site is off of Eolus Ave. There is an existing one story home, attached 2 car garage, trellis, and
shed on the property. The site has a number of trees, fences in various states of disrepair, and the yard is
overgrown with weeds, plants and trees that have not been tended to.
The property is surrounded by residential properties on all sides. With the property located on the downward
slope of Eolus, the development of this parcel would not adversely affect any views. In addition, the project
proposes much lower lot coverage than is allowed by the current zoning.
ICI Q IMOM � OGJ4�QOOG3�
1802 Fteg Ave, Encinitas, GA iamd - Ph 760-%0,6773 itects
U I IC—s
Email: debonhasa\dlagoarthltects.com We6slh: emnt.smrdie8oarchitec[s.com
r�ro�n�r�n �eva�e�r�rs e-a� nrvn�
We have submitted an application for a Tentative Parcel Map and Coastal Development Permit to the City of
Encinitas. Drawings are available for review upon request.
We are looking forward to meeting with you to show you our design proposal for this new development. We
encourage you to come to the meeting to learn about the project and voice any concerns or questions that you
may have. If you are unable to attend the meeting, or if you have any questions before then, please feel free to
contact Deborah Shewaga, Architect, 760 - 560 -6773, email: deborah@sandieeoarchitects.com.
Please join us on:
Saturday, July 28, 2018
10:OOAm- 11:OOAm
at
1112 Ectlus Ave,
Encinitas, CA 92024
y C
, 2
uaaera.5` f; ie na , .
� Yea A?•'.V c. Santoid5`
� is610i aj '
luP\ev5a -
[ lawnq,
Leu�adia
S6mh \rd5n � 2
4 ' 3
n+aru5t io
�P4.5
Fu -�eJ iv C�
Vicinity Map:
�y
9�
:. GI.. Sf
I
CV \oP
Grm Rd
Vsnad
ea OR,
F cR
1772 Eo9lus pve, r
Encinitas, CA 92014
{3awd i\
U
tavcadia etvy
Z
v
i
5 4
SFN`a0+ et'ipa
.Blasom Rd
s
e1110n1 A.-
qQ
n
Leucadia Blvd_.
3- x -Pwbb St
Stmr.IJ )t
RJ+ea�
anc
mdYad mw &
OGarr fpco
2
Vi
. I
4
3WOa0 t`Am
*This notice is being sent to you in fulfillment of the City of Encinitas Citizen Participation Program requirements (FAI.C. 23.06). This outreach effon
to our neighbors is necessary because an application for development has been or will be filed with the City of Encinitas. Planning & Building
Department. The sole purpose of this process is to be a preliminary tool for opening a dialogue and to ensure that the project applicants and the citizens
both have an opportunity in the planning process to discuss, understand. and try to resolve neighborhood issues related to potential impacts of a
proposed project on the surrounding neighborhood. It is not meant to necessarilyIt is not meant to necessarily change or prevent a�eet as proposedor prevent a�eet as proposed Please continue to monitor
any notices you receive as changes may be made to the project before the final decision is made. Questions about this notice and the proposed
development should be directed to the contact person and/or information above. Questions regarding the Citizen Participation Program should be
directed to the Planning & Building Department at (760) 633-27 10.
2
June 11, 2018
CASE NUMBER: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
RE: Proposed Development at 1112 Eolus Ave, Encinitas, CA 92024
APPLICATION TYPE/ LOT INFORMATION/ZONING:
This project is being submitted for a Tentative Parcel Map and Coastal Development
Permit. The Site presently exists as one large 29,900 s.f. lot, APN 254 -39- 110 -00 The site
is zoned R -3 and is within the coastal, special study, and scenic /visual corridor overlay
zones.
PROPERTY OWNER:
Tourmaline Properties Inc.
President: Ben Ryan
2079 Garnet, Ave,
San Diego, CA 92109
858 - 799 -1020
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS:
The existing site is gently sloping from East to West with an average lot slope of
approximately 7 %. Present access to the site is off of the paved city road, Eolus Ave. and
down a sloped paved driveway located approximately 48' north of the South property line.
The site has no other road or alley access.
The existing site has a number of trees, many of which are fruit trees that have not been
cared for. The site also has a number of fences segmenting the property all in various
states of disrepair. Generally the large yard is overgrown with weeds, plants and trees that
have not been tended to.
There is an existing one story older ranch style home on the property with an attached 2 car
garage and trellis. There is also a small shed located to the west of the home. The
properties on the South and West sides have an existing wood fence boarding the lot, with
the properties to the north having a wood and metal mesh or chain link fence with some
section in need of repair /replacement.
D
/rkM4
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
We are proposing the subdivision of one large parcel into two separate legal lots as allowed
per R3 zoning. On each new lot we propose the construction of a 2 story single family
residence with attached garage. This proposal reflects the size, use and scale of the
adjacent developed parcels, and in general, many other properties located in the R3 zone
throughout Leucadia.
Specifically, we are proposing the following:
- Demolition of the existing 1631 s.f. residence, 550 s.f. attached garage and 452 s.f. shed.
- Subdivision of the existing 29,990 s.f. lot into two separate legal lots
-On lot 'A' the easterly lot we proposed a lot with gross /net area of 14,500 s.f. with a new
two story 4049 s.f. single family residence.
-On lot 'B' the westerly lot we proposed a panhandle(lane access) on the north side of the
property, a gross /net lot area of 15,490 s.f. with a new two story 4091 s.f. single family
residence.
DESIGN APPROACH:
The overall site planning approach was to create two lots with ample space for each
residence allowing for a large useable yard. Both homes sit more centrally on their lots
allowing for greater separation from house to property line than the minimum required by
the City of Encinitas
The homes are designed in a style of contemporary farmhouse, reflecting on the eclectic
nature of housing in the area. The massing of each home is broken up by creating one and
two story areas. Furthermore, the use of a combination of metal and composite roofing,
and varying wall finishes of siding and board and batten create two distinct homes that we
believe will integrate and enhance the streetscape along Eolus.
Although stylistically each home was approached in a similar fashion, the plans, massing
and layout of each home is uniquely different based on its individual site conditions and
surroundings.
SURROUNDING SITES:
The properties to the south are a newer single family development with a cul -de -sac and 4
single family residences. The property to the west is a single family home on what appears
to be a panhandle lot. To the north east is a single family residence with direct vehicular
access from Eolus. At the north west corner appears to be vacant lot with access from a
private road or easement to the north. To the east, across Eolus, is a single family home
and
2
a vacant lot both with direct access from Eolus. All adjacent properties are zoned R -3
residential with the higher density zone of R8 two blocks to the west. The properties all
tend to slope from east to west with gentle slopes. The styles of adjacent homes vary
greatly. Most homes are larger 2 story homes with craftsman cottage to contemporary
designs.
There are no apparent views from this property to the ocean. With the property located on
the downward slope of Eolus the developments on the east side of Eolus sit much higher in
elevation and therefor development of this parcel would not adversely affect their views. In
addition, the project proposes much lower lot coverage than is allowed by the current
zoning. This provides a greater area of both lots that will not be built on at this time.
NOTIFYING METHOD:
All property owners and occupants within a 500- foot radius of the property located at 1112
EOLUS Ave, Encinitas, CA 92024 will be sent a copy of the neighborhood letter and the
vicinity map in the mail. Any other groups that the City feel should be notified will also
receive a letter. This Citizen Participation Plan would give the community the opportunity to
provide comments, input and ask questions about the proposed project. Input from the
community will be obtained at a neighborhood meeting to be held at the project site.
Schedule for completing the Citizen Participation Plan
06 -19 -18 Submit citizen participation plan to the planning staff for approval
07 -28 -18 Hold Site Meeting
08 -03 -18 Written Report of all contact during CPP process to planning staff
3
04C�C�4MQ� � Oa�C�QDOQ�
D A"r 1802 Hyyela Ave, Encinites, CA 92024 - Ph 7W ,%0877V
Email: debomh(✓ =dherc
gnhtecfa.com Website: v .sondi*archibids.com-
D
VICINITY MAP:
N
W E
S
Sign -In -Sheet
Project: 1112 EOLUS AVE, ENCINITAS, CA 92024
Case #: 18 -140 TPM/CDP
Printed Name
Address
Signature
Signature
`fei`V
m in mail
i `e ""'
received
Letter in mail
Printed Name
Address
Signature
g
I received
Letter in mail
I did not
received
Letter in mail
June 11, 2018
Comments
Project: 1112 EOLUS AVE, ENCINITAS, CA 92024
Case #: 18 -140 TPM /CDP
1. Do the documents and presentation clearly identify the scope of the project?
Y/N
If no, please describe areas requiring clarification.
2. Do you have any other issues or concerns requiring further review?
Y/N
If yes, please explain.
Name (please print)
Address
Additional Comments:
Il \ \
y , \
N
` 7
i
ti -A
ad Sk
1
Case #18 -140 TPM /CDP - 1112 Eolus Avenue
DISCLAIMER:
Buffer o This map should not be used for Engineering, - Map Coordinates: Stateplane NAD83 Feet, CA Zone 6 N
Survey, or Site - Specific Analysis. - Parcel lines are not survey accurate, and some parcels can be
254 - 391 -10 -00 Every reasonable effort has been made to assure positionally off up to ./- 40 feet
the accuracy of the data provided; nevertheless, - Photo flight dates: July 2009. 4 inch pixel resolution. Digital true color.
Parcels in Buffer some information may not be accurate. - Orthophoto and Topo positional accuracy meet the precision
The City of Encinitas assumes no liability s adequate to support National Map Accuracy Standards 0 80 160 Feet
Tax Parcel responsibility I
arising from the use of or reliance upon this information. for 1" = 100' mapping. I I
APN
MailToName
MailStreet
MailCity
MailZip
MailState MailCountr
2543912200
HAVELOCK 2015 TRUST
1004 EOLUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543920200
FERNANDEZ FAMILY TRUST
1007 EOLUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543910100
FONTANINI LIVING TRUST
1015 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024 -1741
CA
2543922200
LEE JANICE FAMILY 1992 TRUST 06 -25 -92
1027 EOLUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543922600
SURFACE CHARLES TRUST O1 -26 -03
1040 ORPHEUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543302000
YEAKLEY RONALD D AND PATRICIA A 1991 TRUST 08 -14 -9
1042 HYMETTUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543914000
MONTEATH FAMILY TRUST 07-18-05
1043 HYMETTUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543911400
ROACH JUSTIN AND JESSICA
1044 EOLUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543913000
ROGERS DIANE C
1047 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543914900
BLUEBIRD TRUST 08 -10 -15
1048 EOLUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543914100
CALCUTT NIGELA
1051 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2542624900
PETERSON RANDAL L AND DONNA M
1058 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543914200
CALHOUN TRUST 12 -23 -94
1059 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543915200
LEZIY SONIA
1063 BREEZEWAY DR
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543915300
WILLIAMS MATTHEW P AND ANDREA M
1064 BREEZEWAY DR
ENCINITAS
92024 -1596
CA
2543912800
BRUINZEEL SUSAN E B
1065 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543915100
DARCY FAMILY TRUST
1067 BREEZEWAY DR
ENCINITAS
92024 -1596
CA
2543912900
POWELL SHERI L REVOCABLE TRUST 06 -03 -14
1067 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543915400
VOLZ JEFFREY TAND ANDREA M
1068 BREEZEWAY DR
ENCINITAS
92024 -1596
CA
2542624800
KOVALEVA NINA
1076 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543913100
TAYLOR MARK E AND KIMBERLY D
1089 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543913300
ANDERSON MICHAEL H AND ELLEN
1091 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2542622200
WILMS ERICH E LIVING TRUST O1 -11 -91
1098 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543912600
POSNER FAMILY TRUST 01 -11 -85
1111 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2542622000
BINFORD RICHARD AND KATHRYN TRUST 09 -30 -88
1112 HYMETTUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543912500
ISGITT FAMILY TRUST 10 -23 -15
1115 HYMETTUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543912400
VANWINKLE FAMILY 2014 TRUST 12 -08 -14
1119 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543921500
DESMOND PATRICK AND KATHY
1122 ORPHEUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2542620800
RENFRO JAMES C AND SOWDER VALERIE TRUST
1128 HYMETTUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543921900
MEDINA FRANK J LIVING TRUST 04-16-02
1136 ORPHEUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543921800
SHAW HOWARD AND LISA FAMILY TRUST 11 -30 -07
1139 EOLUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543921700
ALDERN SCOTT AND KATHLEEN FAMILY TRUST 04 -16 -07
1143 EOLUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543922000
GUTIERREZ CARLOS E AND LAURA
1144 ORPHEUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543911700
JUSTICE TRUST O5 -19 -08
1147 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2542620700
MICKELSON ROSEMARIE G 2016 TRUST 09 -07 -16
1148 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543911600
LEE MADELAINE 1 2004 TRUST
1151 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024 -1743
CA
2543911800
NICOLSON CHERYL M
1155 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543913600
ZENO JOAN M
1156 EOLUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543812400
PETERS MICHAEL AND LEIGH
1159 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024 -1743
CA
2543812600
GOURLEY FAMILY TRUST 03 -21 -94
1163 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543821100
VONDESSONNECK KAREN REVOCABLE TRUST 06 -19 -08
1165 EOLUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543812500
SUNDSTEDT JOHN P AND ALICIA M
1169 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543814300
MACMITCHELL MELANIE TRUST
1170 EOLUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543814200
GILMORE FAMILY TRUST 06 -22 -95
1174 EOLUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2542620600
KIFFMANN HELMUT AND MOORE PATRICIA
1174 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543821800
STITS KIMBERLY J
1177 EOLUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543814400
ARONSON FAMILY TRUST 06-03-94
1179 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543814500
RICHTER HANS M AND JENNIFER M FAMILY TRUST 06 -26 -1
1183 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543814700
VACCARO THOMAS AND JAN FAMILY TRUST 11 -16 -13
1186 EOLUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543812800
SANFORD BRIAN 1
1203 HYMETTUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543821900
ANDERSON VALERIE L TRUST 12 -02 -09
1205 EOLUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543814600
KELLAR NICHOLAS M AND STEPHANIE 1
1206 EOLUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543813000
ANDERSON PAUL L AND GAIL C
1212 EOLUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2542620500
LEWIS M S FAMILY TRUST 11 -18 -99
1212 HYMETTUS AVE
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543814900
EISCHEN TRUST 02 -01 -02
1221 HYMETTUS AVE
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543911000
MARTIN STEVEN C
1333 HYGEIA AVE
ENCINITAS
92024 -1622
CA
2543910400
LIPSON RITCHIE H
1400 E SOUTHERN AVE UNIT 400
TEMPE
85282
AZ
2543910200
WADE FAMILY TRUST 09 -06 -13
418 NAIAD ST
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543913400
PATEL SHIRISH AND SANGEETA
4232 N LAKE DR
SHOREWOOD
53211
WI
2543910300
STARKMAN RICHARD C
430 NAIAD ST
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543911200
LEONARD SCOTT M AND TRINA M
460 NAIAD ST
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543911300
KASSMAN FAMILY TRUST O1 -31 -08
470 NAIAD ST
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543912100
WINTERBOURNE TRUST 09-29-09
480 NAIAD ST
LEUCADIA
92024
CA
2543814800
CHASE JOHN D JR
560 N COAST HWY UNIT.101
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543912300
TYLER CATCHING MARS TRUST O1 -05 -83
605 SAN YSIDRO RD
SANTA BARBARA
93108
CA
2543821500
STROMBERG IVAR A AND JANET M
611 STRATFORD DR
ENCINITAS
92024
CA
2543913800
EOLUS - ALTAMIRA LLC
7409 MISSION HILLS DR
LAS VEGAS
89113
NV
2543922700
SANDERSON REVOCABLE TRUST 06 -13 -02
PO BOX 232828
ENCINITAS
92023
CA
2543913200
BELTRAN FAMILY LIVING TRUST 09 -04 -03
PO BOX 501671
SAN DIEGO
92150
CA
COASTAL COMMISSION
7575 METROPOLITAN DR. #103
SAN DIEGO
92108
CA
LEUCADIA WASTEWATER DISTRICT
1960 LA COSTA AVE
CARLSBAD
92009
CA
LEUCADIA - ENCINITAS TOWN COUNCIL
PO BOX 232193
ENCINITAS
92023
CA
-0/( �r
APN
FullAddres
City
ZipCode
2543920200
1007
Eolus Ave 1
Encinitas
92024
2543920200
1007
Eolus Ave 2
Encinitas
92024
2543912300
1030
Eolus Ave
Encinitas
92024
2543922700
1036
Orpheus Ave
Encinitas
92024
2543923100
1055
Eolus Ave
Encinitas
92024
2543923100
1055
Eolus Ave A
Encinitas
92024
2543923000
1077
Eolus Ave
Encinitas
92024
2543913200
1079
Hymettus Ave
Encinitas
92024
2542622200
1098
Hymettus Ave A
Encinitas
92024
2543911000
1112
Eolus Ave
Encinitas
92024
2543923200
1117
Eolus Ave
Encinitas
92024
2543913800
1138
Eolus Ave
Encinitas
92024
2543921800
1139
Eolus Ave A
Encinitas
92024
2543913400
1148
Eolus Ave
Encinitas
92024
2543814800
1182
Eolus Ave
Encinitas
92024
2543821500
1214
Orpheus Ave
Encinitas
92024
2543910400
440 Naiad St
Encinitas
92024
''ROJECT FACILITY AVAILABILITY FORM - CitY Of Encinitas SCHOOL
Please type or use pen
(Twe forms are needed if project is to be servec by separate school districts) ORG t - �3
- ) r r�2T1 F=S I N C. ACCT
O: :nE shame Phcne �C',_(Cf C(- ACT
ELEdJi3dTARY
2C r I ��A�N� 5 ee, TAS'F. HIG .SCHOO__
ar's h zilinc Addra =_s
chN C A C'I 1 T +i DAr uNrl_D
jil�( G
Zio DISTRICT CASNIn5 USE ONLY
SECTION 1. PROJECT DESCRI:fT10N TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
A. LEGISLATIVE ACT Assessor's Parcel Nlumber(s)
F7 Rezone from _zone densic;'in e's!y tc _ .one density . intensry. (Add extra it ran- sse.y)
l� G -ner_l Plan Amendment
-
l F�— �apaoiflc Plan 2- 1-2)
L So =dfc Plan Amendment _ i
Z. r.,; _- t OP MENT PROJECT
%1_. -r Subdivision (Th)
�
f ! =arSubdivision (TPtd) ;
;-v Adjustment
I i P.'- -1cr -Use Permit (ftUP), purp:s,. -_ ...— -- - --
'. !
cx. Case —
?: ia d vao... C ase No._ Thomas Bros. Pag =___(,, nd
✓ �'„ 7mjectaddress
jLu� �c
C == -:endaI....... Total numta; ,..alL-c units -. ..•
I f omerciai ...... Gross tiocc
I i ........ Gross floor
Ift ............ Gross floc: c,'a =.
r q 7 I,..I_�
C A U.1 l
Z.in_,mb -rcf Iots / _
Date _ `l (I
AppiicaoC5 sicjnaz:ure
--L'/
Ad r r= Phone
7
non comoletlon of above, present to the school district to complete Section 2 below)
BE COMPLETED BY
It not in a unified district, which elementary or
higtt�vchoof di trio 3t also fill ous a form?
District Name il3 T ✓�f (•U13 -61(74 GYlP7>7/ /tSn%1%1 /[Yl Fk
Indicate the loc 'ion 2 d distance of proposed schon) attendance. Etemepta �1 miles:_ \
�nior /Middle: miles: L High school- i I miles_
Li This project will r sult in the overcrowding of the ❑ elementary junior /middle Plhigh school.
(check all that apply)
E� Fees will be levied either In accordance with Government Code Section 53080 or Section 65970 prior to the
issuance of building permits.
Project is located entirely within the district and is eligible for service.
The project is not located entirely within the district and a potential boundary issue may exist with the
school district.
FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTS (Rezones, General Plan Amendments, Specific Plans) ONLY:
❑ Pursuant to County Ordinance and the Public Facility Element of the General Plan, facilities to serve the project
have been committed through a binding agreement satisfactory to the school district.
❑ A binding agreement has not yet been signed, but one will be required prior to legislative approval.
0 No binding agreement is necessary.
Authorized signature: p Print name: N k
Print title: EXYPf(i7lr� nlY( /fC� l/l%lf7/ 1// �l j J _ Phone:
on Completion o Section 2 by the district, applicant is to
submit this form with applicatio =. tO the zoning Counter at the Planning
& Community Development Depart -.ent, 505 S. Vulcan Ave., Encinitas, CA
PROJECT FACILITY AVAILABILITY FORM - UIN OT tI1onitas 5UrlUl
Please type or use pen
(Trc forms are naeded if ProjeCtt is tom be serve_ cy separate schcoi distn=) ORG ` u
N Cl ACCT_ — \J
2 CLt,�;E7 Air ez�!
TASK sc :,3oL
Qrrner'a t- ailica Address Sxeet
� 1 ,7ATc— UNIFIED
Sate Zip I C;STRICT CASH; =n> USE O :LY --
Ci': 1
SECTION 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
TO BE COMPILE 1 Lu ar A'F'LU,Afl1
Assessor's ParCe: ivUmber(s)
A. LEGISLATIVE ACT
R,C..e from._ zone dens'c.ir.ter_ :; to —:-one density :5n;znsi; }•.
(Adder•ra �; c-c-s;ary)
..
i �eaaral Plan Amendment
,1, 7 C� 30
I
1 i Szecili: Plan
_ -J-L'
-'
• _o =ci' :c Plan A,�.ercment
I i
I I G
i
iII
0 . c_OPMENT PROJECT
'�' =• SubdivisionfTM)
.._f --
7�% ::• Subdivision (TPh!)
�i
I
it
Ro. -,;ry Adjustment
I
'!se Permit(MUP). Fur•,.•;. -_ —_� —
'-
_ T -;c extension... Case Na___ —
..
g____ -..
Thomas Bros. Pa c
tfap... case
G r: .9a.^anual ... .. .Total rn:mbc: ci_. ._.:,a units L
?rajec; address
- ..
i � erciai...... Gross floor- . =.
_
Gressflo -.___
-- .,.al........ .
_ . ... Gross fio.. -:?P
? yec: acreage : J I -c'i n. -tuber of lots �-
`
^��
Dare _ °x (I
Y
n �y� y%/ !> StC' E• 7 I
�� AJC GI"�.1 _ti, z
Phone
Addr=ess _Ta
(On completion of above, present to the school district
to complete Section 2 below)
SECTION 2. FACILITY AVAILABILITY TO BE. COMPLETED BY DISTRICT
If not in a unified district, which elementary or
high school district must also fill out a form?
District Name �^(�; \(UtG�611�V�IDYI S�kIVD Isiy1C± 1
Indicate the location and distance of proposed schools of attendance. ElementarypAA\ miles: 1.30
�nThis p project miles: High school' miles:
This project will result in the overcrowding of the ®elementary ❑ junior/Middle [high school.
(check all that apply)
Fees will be levied either In accordance with Government Code Section 53080 or Section 65970 prior to the
issuance of building permits.
M Project is located entirely within the district and is eligible for service.
❑ The project is not located entirely within the district and a potential boundary issue may exist with the
school district.
FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTS (Rezones, General Plan Amendments, Specific Plans) ONLY:
0 Pursuant to County Ordinance and the Public Facility Element of the General Plan, facilities to serve the project
have been committed through a binding agreement satisfactory to the school district.
0 A binding agreement has not yet been signed, but one will be required prior to legislative approval.
0 No binding agreement is necessary. //)
Authorized signature: !��t��
"(' L (./l I�,['(( Printname-BvSV ±bM-Y\
Print tRl >'
r�Yl1N \�' Phone: \ 1ttN� -1'i T X4300 X Ilb°I
on Completion of Section 2 by
submit this form %Jith apolication t
& Community Development Department,
the district, applicant is to
o the Zoning Counter at the Planning
505 S. Vulcan Ave., Encinitas, CA
PRC),IFCT FACILITY AVAILABILITY FORM
or
Scat IP1� �t 1 )c `Ql'16'P�P'r1ES l NC
Owner's name ��at LNET street address
Ot
�rgq —I d �D
_
F6-0 �-(:Z I a °r
�ly ' —Sate ZIP
A. rInJorSubdivision (TM) Specific Plan or Specific Plan Amendment
orSubdivisbn(TPM) Boundary Adjustment
Certificate of Compliance, purpose:
Mayor Use Permit (MUP), purpose:
Rezone (Reclassllbatbn) from to zone
Time Extension... Case No.
Expiteo map •• -... Case No.
Other
S. Resldensal_...Total number of dwell ng units Z
Commercial. ...... Gross floor area
ORG
ACCT
ACT
TASK
AMTS
DATE
Assessor's Parcel Number(s)
(Add extra it necessary)
2.J
Thomas Bros. Page Grid
FIRE
Fr
Industrial ...........Gross door area \I 1 Z �v 5 Au=
Other .............Grosstboraraa pmJeaeddress
C. Total Project acreage . aTotailots smallest proposed lot )
LOT__ /(zt,)n' nit
i b r n wo^
OWNERIAPPLICANT AGREES TO COMPLETE ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY THE DISTRICT, e(ZCL7�.
Appllcanfa,igmQtture: L/� > O Date: c
Address: ' CJ D? t R 1kwkw T Pbcna. -72,6 - J 6Q . - -6 7 -�T
(On eetnpiellon of above, present to the dla let that provides Ilre protection t0 complete Section 2 and 3 below)
SECTION 2. FACILITY AVAILABILITY TO BE COMPLETED- BY DISTRICT
District Name:
Indicate the location and distance of the primary fire station that will serve the proposed project: fl%L.`51wh n
A Project Is In the District and eligible for 64rvica.
ProJJJJJJed Is not In District but it Is within its Sphere of Influence boundary, owner roust apply for annexation.
Pro�ect is not In the District and not within the District's Sphere of Influence.
�j Pro su Is not jousted entirely within the District and a potential boundary Issue exists with the District.
B.Qg Based on the capadty and trepabilRy ct the Districts existing and planned facilities, fire protection facilities are currently
adeQuate or will be adequate to serve the proposed project. The expected emergency travel time to the proposed project
Is 1 minutes.
❑Fire protection facilities are not expected to be adequate to serve the proposed development within the next five years.
C.j�j District conditions are attached. The number of sheets attached:
District will submit conditions at a later date.
Note: The fuelbreak requirements ppllBescribed by the Ore district for the pproposed profiect do not authorize any
coca , u. rnnrn7xrarvveva/ hvrheDeoartmenro (Plannina and Land Use.
eWithin the proposed project feet of clearing will be required around all structures.
The proposed project Is located In a hazardous will land fire area, and additional fuegtreak requirements may apply.
Environmental mitigation requirements should be coordinated with the fire district to ensure that these requirements
Will not pose fire hazards.
Date: f t2 Expiration date: 4A7.fr4 (One yeartmen date olissuance uniessdlsMct irelcares otherwise)
WIQt94& rte l/fij'lnl'tiEAL6C 5rDapui4 F;rc. )toQ- La,2-:20 meralvol
On completion of Section 2 and 3 by the District, applicant ii to submit
this form with application to: Zoning Counter at the Planning and
Development Department, 505 S. Vulcan Ave., Encinitas, CA 92024
PROJECT FACILITY AVAILABILITY FORM- City of Encinitas SEWER
Please type or use pen
ORG
'r,— ? ZL)-Pep •
ACCT
ACT
Owner's ame Phone OSO_ -1c"
4street
TASK
(I2 6)6�
DATE AMT$
DISTRICT CASHIERS USE ONLY
city Stake ZIP
-SECTION�l. :.PROJECT .��DESCRIPTION�7,.::,.'�:
T0 ,BF_'C
-1. OMIPLETEDBy,.<'APPLICANT
Assessor's Parcel Number(s)
A. ajor Subdivision (TM) Cerdficate of Compliance: (Add extra If necessary)
B
Minor Subdivision (TPM) Boundary Adjustment
Specific Plan or Specific Plan Amendment
Rezone (Reclassification) from —zone
Major Use Permit (MUP), purpose:
Time Extension... Case No.
Expired Map... Case No.
❑ Other
R
B. Residential ... Total number of dwelling units
ommerclal ... Gross floor area
roic"Ither
dustri2l.. .. . Gross floor area Thomas Bros. Page Grid
........ Gross floor area
C. Total Project acreage Total number of lots Project address 'Aut -
Y. N.
D. Is the project proposing its own wastewater treatment plant? ❑ r_ k 14 11 fkE7 1L_ C- uc A"c"), I
Is the project proposing the use of reclaimed water? 0 Commi.Advisory Board Area
Owner/Applicant agrees to pay all necessary construction costs and dedicate all district required easements to extend service to the project.
OWNER/APPLICANT MUST COMPLETE ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY THE DISTRICT.
Applicant's Signature: 5e��r -�� Date:
Address: _U502- R-y/)c-kPN A(jE Ei=rca,,aAs CA Phone: 70' 5W ' L773
(On completion of above, present to the sewer district to establish facility availability. Section 2 below)
SECTION 2.. _O, BE. , COMPLETED:. BYDISTRICT,
District name 1-itkto&O, WC-5btwo-btr Ui,**TiL* Service area Gib r) i +C,% , C
A.0 Project Is In the district.
,Project Is not In the district but Is within Its Sphere of Influence boundary, owner must apply for annexation.
• Project Is not in the district and Is not within its Sphere of Influence boundary.
• The project Is not located entirely within the district and a potential boundary issue exists with the — District.
B.gFacilities to serve the project MARE [DARE NOT reasonably expected to be available within the next 5 years based on the
capital facility plans of the cifstrict. Explain in space below or on attached. Number of sheets attached:
0 Project will not be served for the following reason(s):
0.0 District conditions are attached. Number of sheets attached:
0 District has specific water reclamation conditions which are attached. Number of sheets attached:
')[ District will submit conditions at a later date.
D.5Z How far will the plpellne(s) have to be extended to serve the project? Qr%kn x..jr
Date: kAk1t5 Expiration date: _(421��One year from date of Issuance unless district Indicates otherwise)
I
Authorized signature: r0_0,14L42ZX5=2 Print name: --ran YZ'-lPc�
Print title: r7e,1A 5(!_r.)Zee-S 50 Gt C,(ZS+ Phone: 1-76o) 5,i-0155
NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A COMMITMENT OF FACILITIES OR SERVICE BY THE
DISTRICT. On completion of Section 2 by the district, applicant is to
c.ubmit this form with application to the Zoning Counter at the Planning &
(( OVA911 Community Development,' S. Vulcan Ave., Encinitas, CA 92024
PROJECT FACILITY AVAILABILITY FORM - City of Encinitas WATER
Please type or use pen ORG WIA
I G ACCT
Owner's Name / c1� no O`er ACT
2 Q F7 AP Lw_—t' j.II�,. CJ TASK
Owner's Me I.rg Address Street
DATE AMTS
City Slate Lip DISTRICT CASHIERS USE ONLY
SECTION 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
Assessor's Parcel Number(s)
A. M ' r Subdivision (TM) 8 Specific Plan or Specific Plan Amendment (Add extra if necessary)
iunr SubdivisioneTPM) CerGllceta of Compliance:
Boundary Adjustment S 141 911 1 F3 O�
Rezone (Reclassification) from W --zone.
Major Use Permit(MUP), purpose: - _ - -_ --
Time Extension... Case No.
Expired Map... Case No. .
'
ri Other
B.�,Ygesidenbal....... Total number of dwelling units Z-
❑ Commerdal...... Gross floor area
[L,j Industrial ........ Gfossfborarea Thomas Bros. Page Grid
Other........... Gross floor area
��c Z
C. Total Project acreage • b i Total number of tots Project address street
,..,/ rwtr-it akt4S / L_EU[AI(Jl &_ Zip s'
D. Is the project proposing the use of groundwater? ❑ Yes [9N�o� ommunity Planning Area/Subregion
Zip
Is the project proposing the use of reclaimed water? I] Yes LlYN0
Owner /Applicant agrees to pay all necessary constructioncosts. dedcate all district required easements to extend service to the project and
/�COMPL TEALLCONDITIONSREOUIREDBY THEDISTRICT.
Applicant's Signature: f - - - Date: 6 F2
Address:- 25n% FA T h "( — Am= —P-'7K)C1 N iTAS rA Ptane: 7AQ • SZLt • 67
(On complaton of above, present to the water dlstrlcl to establish facility availability, Section 2 below)
SECTION 2. FACILITY AVAILABILITY TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICT
Dissiriict name _,
SiFry biEG�h o ty4 phy� Servicearea EnC,rvrInrS
A.ISd Project is in the district.
L7 Project is not In the district but is within as Sphere of Influence boundary, owner must apply for annexation.
Project is not in ;he district and is not within he sphere o' Influence boundary.
❑ The project is not located entirely within the district and a potential boundary issue exists with the Distr ct.
B.j'Facilities to serve the project CR?(RE ❑ ARE NOT reasonably expected to be available within the next 5 years based on the
capital facility plans of the district. Explain In space below or on attached —. (Number of sheets)
❑ Project will not be served for the following reason(s):
C.0 District conditions are attached. Number of aheets attached,-
❑ District has specific water reclamation conditions which are attached. Number of shoots attached:
District will submit conditions at a later date.
D.0 How far will the plpeiine(s) have to be extended to serve the project?
Date: iv- it -1ru Excitation date: (One year from date of issuance unles�sydistrict Indicates otherwise.)
Authorized signature: -O Print name: I�LM1rr2. 6
Printtltla_ SCFf10R__ GhI//� /,-- C&—f— Ph0 no: 7/�o Z79�
NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A. COMMITMENT OF SERVICE OR FACILITIES BY THE
DISTRICT. On completion of Section 2 by the district, applicant is to
submit this form with application to the Zoning Counter at the Planning S
COttllnunit Development Dept., 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Enc' CA 92024
r ur n
ALPINE ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING
P.O. Box 2155 Alpine, SOIL TESTING
California 91903 Surveying
Technical Assistance (619) 445 -2024 Subdivisions
aiirornia Livii rngmeer
June 12, 2017
Tourmaline Properties
1112 Eolus Avenue
Encinitas, Ca. 92024
Subject: Report of Preliminary Soil Investigation
1112 Eolus Avenue
Encinitas
Dear Mr. Ben Ryan:
Pursuant to your request, we have completed a soil investigation at the subject
address. The findings and recommendations of our investigation are presented in
the attached report.
From a soil engineering standpoint, we find the site suitable for the intended
improvements, provided the project is designed and developed in strict accord,
with the recommendations of the attached report.
If you should have any questions after reviewing the report, please do not hesitate
to call. We appreciate this opportunity to provide our professional services.
Sincerely,
Wallace M. Bei
Civil Engineer
R.C.E. 27697
REPORT
PRELIMINARY SOIL INVESTIGATION
1112 Eolus Avenue Property
Encinitas
Introduction:
Presented herein are the results of our soil investigation completed at the subject
location. The purpose of the investigation is to classify and analyze the bearing
soils, identify potential soil hazards, determine site suitability, and develop
recommendations for site preparation and grading, design of seismic response,
design of foundations, and finish grading of the project.
Site Description:
The site is a vacant subdivision lot located on the westerly side 1112 Eolus Avenue
in the City of Encinitas. The property consists of a sloping building site between 2
and 5 %, with existing improvements on the site with access to Eolus Avenue.
Project Description:
The existing house and vegetation is to be removed along with the large trees
though out the site. The site is to be prepared and graded for construction of two
new, two story residences. Development of the parcel will require excavation of
onsite soil and re- compaction of surface soils along with leveling of the building
sites.
Scope of Investigation:
This investigation consisted of surface inspection, subsurface explorations, field
and Laboratory testing, and analysis of field and laboratory data.
June 12, 2017 Page 1 of 6
Scope of Investigation Continued:
The maximum depth of influence of the proposed development was judged to be 5
feet. Subsurface exploration therefore, consisted of three 5 -foot hand dug hole, for
in -situ bearing capacity and soil characteristics. Test results and analyses are
presented in Engineering Properties below.
Site Soils:
The soil encountered on the site consist of a Reddish Brown, Silty, Sandy. (See
Soil Profile- Figure No. 2 )
Engineering Properties:
Tests and analyses of the prevailing foundation soils indicate the following
engineering properties:
Soil Engineering Property
Maximum Dry Density 128.0 pcf
Optimum Moisture 8.7%
Expansion Index 20 @ 144.7 psf
Unified Classification (SM)
Coefficient of Friction- Soil /Concrete 0.35 X Dead Load
June 12, 2017 Page 2 of 6
Tectonic Setting:
No evidence of faulting was noted during our surface reconnaissance or in our
exploratory hole. A review of available geologic literature did not reveal any major
faulting in the area. It should be noted that much of southern California, including
the City of Encenitus, is characterized by a series of Quatemary-age fault zones
which typically strike in a northerly to northwesterly direction. Some of these fault
zones (and the individual faults within the zone) are classified as active while
others are classified as only potentially active according to the criteria of the
California Division of Mines and Geology.
A review of available geologic maps indicate that the subject property is
approximately (3.8 miles) from the Rose Canyon Fault zone (Type B Fault), and
(7.6 miles) from the Elsinore - Julian Fault zone (Type A Fault).
GEOLOGIC HAZARDS:
Ground shaking —The most likely geologic hazard to affect the site is ground
shaking as a result of movement along one of the active fault zones mentioned
above.
For seismic design purposes, soil parameters in accordance with the 2016
edition of the California Building Code.
Liquefaction Potential In consideration of the competent hard pan, well
Cemented Soil underlying the site, and the lack of a high groundwater level, it
is our opinion that soil liquefaction does not present a significant geotechnical
hazard to the proposed site development.
Landslides Subject property is situated on gently sloping terrain and
underlain by competent hard pan, well Cemented Soil. A review of available
geologic maps did not reveal the presence of any ancient landslides on subject
or adjacent properties. The potential for landslides on subject and adjacent
properties is considered minimal.
June 12, 2017 Page 3 of 6
Groundwater:
No groundwater was encountered in the exploratory trenches to the maximum
depth of exploration at 5 feet, and no major groundwater related problems, either
during or after construction, are anticipated. However, it should be recognized that
minor seepage problems may occur after development of a site even where none
were present before development. These are usually minor phenomena and are
often the results of an alteration of the permeability characteristics of the soils:
an alteration in drainage patterns due to grading; and an increase in the use of
irrigation water.
Based on the permeability characteristics of the soils and anticipated usage of
the development, it is our opinion that any seepage problems which may
occur will be minor in extent. It is further our opinion that these problems can
be most effectively corrected on an individual basis if and when they develop.
Site Suitability:
The site is stable and, with strict adherence to the recommendations, which
conclude this report, will be suitable for its intended use
RECOMMENDATIONS
Site Preparation and grading:
Prepare and excavation of the footings. After the remnants of existing fills are
removed, and the area where the proposed footings are to be constructed are
cleared of all trash and debris, surface soils under the proposed building areas that
are found to have compacted fill should be excavated to a minimum depth of 36
inches brought to near optimum moisture, covered with soil compacted to above 90
percent of maximum dry density. Surfaces exposed in the excavations should be
scarified and moisture conditioned prior to re- compaction operations.
June 12, 2017 Page 4 of 6
Seismic requirements set forth in CBC 2010, per Chapter 12.8 of ASCE 7 2005,
Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure, and will be safe for use in the design of
structures on this project.
Location: 92054, Encinitas
Lad. = 33.193175 Long.-117.34475
Occupancy Category: II
Is = 1.0
Seismic Design Category: D
Site Class: D
Ss = 1.116g
Si = 0.429g
R = 6.5 — Wood Shear Walls
Seismic Base Shear V = SDs *I/ R * W
Seismic Earth Pressure
Seismic earth pressure can be taken as an inverted triangle distribution with a
maximum pressure at the top equal to 15H psf (with H being the height of retained
earth in feet). This pressure is in addition to the static design wall load. The
allowable passive pressure and bearing capacity can be increased by 1/3 in
determining the stability of the retaining wall. A factor -of- safety of 1.2 can be
used in determining the stability of the retaining wall under seismic conditions.
Peak ground acceleration shall be assumed equal to Ss /2.5.
Passive Pressure:
The passive pressure for the prevailing soil conditions may be considered to be 300
psf per foot of depth. This pressure may be increased by 1/3 for seismic loading.
The coefficient of friction between concrete and the underlying material may be
assumed to be 0.35. When combining frictional and passive resistance, friction
should be reduced by 1/3. The upper 12 inches of soil should not be, considered
when calculating passive pressures for exterior walls.
Active Pressure:
The active soil pressure for the design of unrestrained earth retaining structures
with level backfills may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid
weighing 35 pounds pcf. For restrained walls, an equivalent fluid pressure of 45
pcf may be assumed. An additional 15 pcf should be added to said values for a
2: 1 (2 feet horizontal : 1 feet vertical) sloping backfill behind the wall. These
pressures do not included any other surcharge loads. The retaining wall backfill
must be well drained and granular type material.
June 12, 2017 Page 5 of 6
Foundation Design:
The foundation system should extend a minimum 12 inches for one story and 18 inches
for two story below the lowest adjacent grade. Each should be reinforced with a
minimum of two No. 4 bars near the bottom and two near the top.
Design of foundations should incorporate a maximum soil bearing pressure of 2000 psf
as determined by proving ring penetrometer tests performed on undisturbed site bearing
soils.
On grade concrete structure slabs should be a minimum of 4 inches thick, cast over 4
inches of clean soil with a moisture barrier and reinforced with No. 3 bars at 18 inches on
center in each direction.
Finish grade the site, after structures and other improvements are installed, such that
surface waters are directed away from building foundations a distance of three feet.
Thence, via surface swales and /or underground drains, toward and into approved
drainage ways.
The foundation and slab design may change depending on the soil type of the
imported material. A review of the foundation and slab design will be done after the
grading is completed and will be addressed in the compaction report.
Foundation Inspection
During Footing Excavation a representative of Alpine Engineering shall be present
to inspect the footing soil. A certification letter is required before the placement of
concrete.
June 12, 2017 Page 6 of 6
Field Technician Report
PRELIMINARYGRADING PLAN
1112 EOLUSAVENUE
APN. 151.391M
A;
I r ��2� j
API 2939110
-71ar"4 LL"
Alpine Engineering
Field/Laboratory-Testing/Analyses
P. O. Box 2155, Alpine, CA. 91903
�EET2113
TEST LOCATION
DATE
1A
Figure No.
r
YlIx
L
APO, 26W BI
APN 23 391 V
15—
�n.mm
Alpine Engineering
Field/Laboratory-Testing/Analyses
P. O. Box 2155, Alpine, CA. 91903
�EET2113
TEST LOCATION
DATE
1A
Figure No.
APPENDIX "A"
INVESTIGATION AND TEST PROCEDURES
1. Surface Inspection and Subsurface Explorations:
1.1 Surface Inspections are conducted by our senior field technician
under the direction of a California Registered Civil Engineer (engineer).
The purpose of the inspection is to: (1) identify and classify the. soil
formations on and /or affecting the site; (2) identify existing or potential
soil hazards; (3) identity disturbances in the natural formation such as
man -made fills, subsurface installations and so on; (4) select the
locations where exploratory excavations :are to be made; and (5) determine
the minimum depths to which the excavations should extend and
recommend the equipment to be used.
Note: Judgements incorporating special site conditions and/or the
type and design loads of proposed structure foundations are
made by the engineer.
1.2 "Subsurface Explorations" consist of trench excavations, hand dug
open pits and /or borings extended beyond the depths of influence by the
grading or foundation system. Undisturbed or. bag samples are transported
to the laboratory for tests and analysis. In -place shear strength, density,
moisture and bearing tests are made in undisturbed strata as directed by
the engineer. All open excavations are backfilled immediately to eliminate
potential hazards.
2. Field and Laboratory Testing:
Field and laboratory tests are performed in accordance with generally
accepted (A.S.T.M.) or (AASHTO) test methods or other procedures set out
by the engineer. Brief descriptions of the tests performed are presented
below:
2.1 In -Place Field Moisture and Density:
Field moisture and density of the soil mass is determined by applying the
current applicable provisions of ASTM test method D -1556 (Sand Cone). In
particular, the sampling procedure consists of:
a. Leveling a portion of the surface to be tested.
Alpine Engineering 1
APPENDIX "A"
INVESTIGATION AND TEST PROCEDURES
Field Moisture and Density Continued:
b. Seating a special base plate approximately 12 inches square
with a 6.5 inch diameter hole and seating ring.
c. Removing 5 to 8 pounds of soil through the hole without
disturbing the remaining soil mass.
d. Determining the volume of the hole by filling it with
calibrated sand of known density through a special cone seated
on the plate. The weight of sand in the hole is determined by
the weight loss from a measured. amount filling the hole.
e. Weighing the soil removed from the hole and thus determining
the in -place density of the soil strata.
f. Moisture is found by drying a sample of the removed soil in an
oven or by calcium carbide chemical analysis. (Speedy
Moisture Tester)
2.1.1 Alternate in -place field density tests:
This method employs an Eley CN -940 Volumeter with a 1.12" i.d. (28.4 mm)
X 2.75" (69.8 mm) cylinder, piston stem marked 0 -30 cc and vernier scale
which reads to 0.05 cc. A density sample is taken by pressing the cylinder
laterally or vertically into undisturbed strata with the stem all the way
back. The volume is then set at 30.00 cm3, the extruded portion trimmed
and the device plus sample accurately weighed. The results are converted
to Pounds /Cu. Ft.
2.2 Proving Ring Penetrometer Tests:
A CN -970 Proving Ring Penetrometer with a 30 degree cone point designed
with an equivalent base area of 1 Square inch is used to determine the
bearing pressures the soil mass will support. The proving ring is
calibrated and accompanied by a chart converting the dial readings to
pounds /square foot up to 250 psf. Actual bearing capacities of undisturbed
strata and /or in -place compacted fill can be determined by direct
measurement in the field. Safety factors related to the uniformity of the
soil mass and experience are applied to the actual capacities by the
engineer to find safe bearing pressures to be incorporated into the
design of foundations on the project.
Alpine Engineering 2
APPENDIX "A"
INVESTIGATION AND TEST PROCEDURES
2.3 In -place Shear Tests:
The CL -600A Trovane Shear Device is used ' in the field to obtain shear
strengths of undisturbed natural strata or compacted fill. The vane driver
has a dial scale which is modified to read shear in tons /square foot while
a uniform normal stress is applied.
2.4 Atterberg Limits:
The " Atterberg Limits" are measured by the water content that
corresponds to the boundaries between several arbitrary states. of
consistency progressing from liquid to solid. These limits tests are
performed on that portion of the material passing a No. 4 sieve.
a.The liquid limit is the water content in percent dry weight at which
the soil first shows a small but definite shearing strength with a
reduction in water content. In reverse direction, it is the water content at
which the soil mass just starts to become liquid.
b. The plastic limit is the water content at which the soil mass ceases
to be plastic and becomes brittle or crumbly when rolled into threads one-
eighth inch in diameter. The plastic limit is always lower than the liquid
limit.
c. The plasticity index is the numerical difference between
the liquid
limit and the plastic limit
and represents the
range of moisture over
which the soil is plastic.
The plasticity index,
in combination
with the
liquid limit, indicates the
sensitivity of _soils
to changes in
moisture
content. Relationships of the plasticity index to
strength and
expansive
properties of soils are well
established.
Alpine Engineering 3
APPENDIX "A"
INVESTIGATION AND TEST PROCEDURES
2.5 Mechanical Analysis:
The mechanical (Sieve) analysis consists of the process of passing a
representative sample through a system of sieves each with progressively
smaller. openings from 6 inches at the top to #200 at the bottom.
Hydrometry is often used to determine grain sizes within that portion
passing the #200 sieve. By weighing the total sample and subsequently
the amount retained on each sieve the portion, or percentage, of the
sample passing each is determined. Data from a mechanical is used to
develop a "gradation curve" (percent finer 'curve) which shows the partical
size distribution. Relationships between the gradation of soils and their
engineering properties are used to evaluate stability, resistance to
erosion or scour, compactibility, shearing resistance and bearing capacity.
2.6 Direct Shear Laboratory Tests:
Direct shear laboratory tests are performed to determine the failure
envelope based on yeald shear strength. The shear box was designed to
accommodate a sample having diameters of 2.375 inches or 2.5 inches and
a height of 1.0 inch. Samples are tested at different vertical loads and
saturated moisture contents. The Shear stress is applied at a constant
rate of strain of approximately 0.05 inches per minute.
When direct shear tests are determined necessary by the engineer
representative samples are transported to a more complete laboratory for
testing. results of shear tests are used to determine, active, passive and
soil bearing pressures through the use of the Rankine and Terzaghi
equations.
2.7 Expansion Index Test:
An expansion index test is performed on remolded representative samples
of soils likely to influence the projects foundation system. A sample
passing the #4 sieve is brought to optimum moisture content, then dried
at a constant temperature of 230 deg. F. for at least 12 hours or until the
moisture remains constant. The specimen is then compacted in a 4 -inch
diameter mold in two equal layers by means of a tamper, then trimmed to
a final height of one inch, and brought to a saturation of approximately
50%.
Alpine Engineering 4
4PPENDIX "A"
INVESTIGATION AND TEST PROCEDURES
2.7 Expansion Index Continued.
top
The specimen is placed in a consolidometer with porous stones at the
and
and bottom, a total normal load of 12,63 pounds (144.7 psf) is applied
the sample is allowed to consolidate for a period of 10 minutes. The
sample is allowed to become saturated and the change in vertical
movement is recorded until the rate of expansion becomes nominal. The
Expansion Index is reported as the total vertical displacement times the
fraction of the sample passing the #4 sieve times 1000.
The expansion index is used to classify the soil in accordance with
Section 2904 (b) of the Uniform Building Code. Special design
consideration is required for structure foundations located on, or within
three feet, of soils with an expansion index greater that 20.
2.8 Density /Moisture Relationship:
The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content (the proctor) of
soils represented on the site are determined in the laboratory in
accordance with ASTM Standard Test D- 1557 -911 Method A. Field moisture
and densities are compared with the appropriate density /moisture test to
judge the density and suitability of soils intended to support structures.
Note:
Results of all tests, findings and analyses are presented in the text of the
report attached hereto.
5
Alpine Engineering
APPENDIX "1311
RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATION- GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. GENERAL:
The site shall be prepared and graded in accordance with this
specification; the approved grading plans; applicable Sections of the
Uniform Building Code; Codes, ordinances and policies of the Governing
Agency; and, recommendations of the attached "Report of Soil
Investigation ".
1.1 Intent:lt is the intent of this specification to establish the level of
control and set out the minimum standards for clearing and grubbing,
preparing natural soils, processing fill soils, placing and compacting fills
and grading the project. This specification is a part of the "Report of Soil
Investigation" (herein after referred to as Report) and shall be used in
conjunction with it. Notwithstanding the recommendations of the "Report",
deviation from this specification will. not be permitted except
when modified in writing by Alpine Engineering.
2. DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this specification the definitions
listed hereafter shall be construed as specified in this specification.
Bedrock is in -place solid rock.
Bench is a relatively level step excavated into earth material on
which fill is to be placed.
Borrow is earth material acquired from an off -site location for use
in grading on a site.
Civil Engineer shall mean a professional engineer registered in the
state of California to practice in the field of civil works. The term Civil
Engineer (herein after referred to as Civil Engineer) is the person
responsible for preparation of the approved grading plans.
Civil Engineering shall mean the application of the knowledge of
the forces of nature, principals of mechanics and the properties of
materials to the evaluation, design and construction of civil works for the
beneficial uses of mankind.
Compaction is the densification of soils by mechanical means.
Earth Material is any rock, natural soil or fill and /or any
combination thereof.
Alpine Engineering Page 1
APPENDIX "B"
RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATION - GENERAL PROVISIONS
DEFINITIONS CONTINUED:
Earthwork includes all site preparation, grading and compaction
operations.
Erosion is the wearing away of the ground surface as a result of the
movement of wind, water and /or ice.
Excavation is the mechanical removal of earth material.
Fill is the deposit of earth material placed by artificial means.
Grade shall mean the vertical location of the ground surface.
Existing Grade is the grade prior to grading.
Rough Grade is the stage at which the grade approximately conforms
to the approved plan.
Finish Grade is the final grade of the site which conforms to the
approved plan.
Grading is any excavating or filling or combination thereof.
Key is a designed compacted fill placed in a trench excavated in earth -
material beneath the toe of a proposed fill slope.
Report is the "Report of Geotechnical Investigation" of which this
specification is a part.
Site is any lot or parcel of land or contiguous combination thereof,
under the same ownership, where grading is performed or permitted.
Slope is an inclined ground surface the inclination of which is
expressed as a ratio of horizontal distance to vertical distance.
Soil is naturally occurring superficial deposits overlying bedrock.
Site Engineer shall mean a civil. engineer experienced and
knowledgeable in the practice of soils engineering. For purposes of this
specification the term Site Engineer shall mean Alpine Engineering.
Site Technician shall mean a soil technician judged to be qualified
by the Site Engineer to perform tests and observations and log the results.
Soils Engineering shall mean the application of the principals of
soil mechanics in the investigation, evaluation and design of civil works
involving the use of earth materials and the inspection and testing of the
construction thereof.
Terrace is a relatively level step constructed in the face of a graded
slope surface for drainage and maintenance purposes.
Unsuitable soil is soil which in the opinion of the site engineer is
not competent to support other soil, fill, or structures or to satisfactorily
perform the other functions for which the soil is intended
3. SUBSURFACE
Alpine Engineering
CONDITIONS: Borings,
trenches and test pit
Page 2
APPENDIX "B"
RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATION- GENERAL PROVISIONS
investigations have been made at available locations defined by the Site
Engineer. Records and /or results of these investigations are set out in the
"Report". The information obtained from these excavations applies only to
conditions encountered at their locations and to the depth to which they
were made. It shall be the responsibility for the contractor to examine the
site personally and to conduct such additional investigations as he may
deem necessary for planning and execution of work. The contractor shall
inform the Site Engineer immediately if any conditions not described in
the "Report" are encountered.
4. HAZARDS: Whenever the Site Engineer determines that any existing
excavation or embankment or fill on private property has become a hazard
to life and limb,or endangers property, or adversely affects the safety,
use or stability of the land the governing, agency, owner, civil engineer,
and contractor shall be notified.
5. QUALITY CONTROL:
5.1 Site Engineer's Responsibility: The site engineer's area of
responsibility shall include, but need not be limited to, responsible charge
of the inspections and approvals concerning the preparation of ground to
receive fills, testing for required compaction, stability of all finish
slopes and the design of buttress fills, where required, and incorporating
data acquired during the earthwork operations and /or supplied by the
"Report".
The site engineer will analyze the results of tests and observations made
by the site technician, exercise engineering judgement and .make all
decisions related to suitability and acceptability of earthwork operations.
The site engineer will prepare a written "Report of Site Preparation,
Grading and Compaction of Fills ". This report will include locations and
elevations of field density tests, summaries of field and laboratory tests
and other substantiating data and comments on any changes made during
grading and their effect on the recommendations made in the "Report He
shall provide approval as to the adequacy of the site for its. intended use.
Alpine Engineering Page 3
APPENDIX "B"
RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATION- GENERAL PROVISIONS
QUALITY CONTROL CONTINUED:
5.2 Contractor's Responsibility: It shall be the responsibility of the
contractor to to assist the site engineer and keep him apprised of work
schedules and any conditions which do not appear to have been defined in
the "Report". Compliance with governing codes, grading the land to the
lines and grades shown on the approved plans and compacting the soils to
specified densities are the sole responsibility of the contractor.
5.3 Test Methods:
optimum moisture and maximum dry density shall be determined in
accordance with ASTM test method D1557 -91 which uses 25 blows of a 10
pound rammer falling 18 inches on each of 5 layers in a 4 inch diameter
1/30 cubic foot cylindrical mold.
In -place field density shall be determined in accordance with ASTM
test method D1556 (sand cone & 6 1/2" field density plate).
Proving Ring Penetrometer tests shall be conducted by the site
technician and used to judge the uniformity, compaction and stability of
the soil mass.
5.4 Location and Elevation of Field Density Tests: Field density
tests shall be taken for approximately each layer of fill, but not to exceed
two feet in vertical height between tests. Field density tests may be
taken at intervals of 6 inches in elevation gain if required by the site
engineer. The location of tests in plan shall so spaced as to give the best
possible coverage and shall be taken no farther apart than 100 feet. Tests
shall be taken on corner and terrace lots for each two feet of elevation
gain. The site engineer may take additional tests as necessary to check on
the uniformity of compaction. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the tests
shall be taken in the compacted material below the disturbed surface.
Additional layers of fill shall not be spread until the site engineer has
determined that the specified density has been reached to the current
elevation.
Alpine Engineering Page 4
APPENDIX "B"
RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATION - GENERAL PROVISIONS
QUALITY CONTROL CONTINUED:
5.5 InspectionISurveillance:
Sufficient inspection and surveillance by the site technician shall be
maintained during the earthwork operations to assure compliance with
this specification.
6. SITE PREPARATION:
6.1 Clearing and Grubbing: Within the areas to be graded, all trees,
brush, stumps, logs and roots shall be removed and legally disposed of.
6.2 Stripping: Stripping, if required in the "Report" or grading plans,
shall be conducted on ail excavation and fill areas. Topsoils shall be
removed to a minimum depth of one foot and shall be stockpiled for use in
finish grading. Any artificial fill or rubbish, organic or other deleterious
material encountered in the stripping operation shall be removed to its
full depth and legally disposed of.
6.3 Preparation of ground: The ground surface shall be prepared to
receive fill by removing vegetation, noncomplying fill, topsoil and other
unsuitable materials to the depths directed by the site engineer,
scarifying to provide a bond with the new fill and, where slopes are
steeper than five to one, by benching into sound bedrock or other
competent material as determined by the site engineer. A key shall be
constructed at the toe of the fill. Where fill is to be placed over a cut, the
bench under the toe of fill shall be at least 10 feet wide but the cut must
be made prior to placing fill and approved by the site engineer as a
suitable foundation for fill.
6.4 Fill Material: Detrimental amounts of organic material shall not be
permitted in fills. Except as permitted by the site engineer, no rock or
similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater that 12
inches shall be buried or placed in fills.
Alpine Engineering Page 5
APPENDIX "B"
RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATION - GENERAL PROVISIONS
SITE PREPARATION CONTINUED:
6.5 Buried Structures: Any abandoned buried structures and utilities
encountered during grading operations shall be totally removed. The
resulting depressions shall be backfilled with suitable material placed
and compacted in accordance with this specification. This includes, but is
not limited to, septic tanks, fuel tanks, sewer lines, leach lines, storm
drains and water lines. Abandoned water wells shall be backfilled and
capped as directed by the site engineer:
7. PLACING AND COMPACTING FILLS
7.1 Source: To the extent practicable, all suitable on -site cut materials
shall be used to construct the fills. 'If cut quantities are insufficient to
bring the site to plan grade levels borrow materials must be approved by
the site engineer before transporting them to the site.
7.2 Sequence of Operations: Filling shall begin : in the lowest section
of the area. Fill shall be spread in layers as hereinafter specified. The
surface of each layer shall be approximately horizontal but will be
provided with sufficient longitudinal and transverse slope to provide for
runoff of surface water from every point. Filling shall be conducted so
that no obstruction to drainage is created at any time. Dewatering
facilities, if any, shall be continuously maintained in .effective operating
condition.
7.3 Layer Construction: Fill shall be spread in approximately horizontal
layers measuring 10 inches in thickness prior to compaction. Each layer of
fill shall be inspected prior to compaction. All visible roots, vegetation,
or debris shall be removed. Stones larger that 12 inches shall be removed
or broken. The water content of each layer shall be determined to be
suitable for compaction or shall be brought to a suitable condition by
measures hereinafter described. Material incorporated in the fill which is
not in satisfactory condition shall be subject to rejection and removal at
the contractor's expense.
Alpine Engineering Page 6
APPENDIX "B"
RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATION - GENERAL PROVISIONS
PLACING AND COMPACTING FILLS CONTINUED:
7.4 Fill Slopes: Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot
rollers or other suitable equipment. In addition, fill slopes at ratios of
two to one or flatter, should be track rolled. Steeper fill slopes shall be
over -built and cut -back to finish contours. Slope compaction shall result
in all fill material six or more inches inward from the finish face of the
slope having a relative compaction of at least 90 % of maximum dry
density. Compaction on the slopes shall continue until the site engineer is
satisfied that they will be stable.
7.5 Compaction: All fills placed on the site and all backfill of removed
topsoils, trenches and retaining walls shall be compacted to within 90%
of maximum dry density. If the percentage compaction at any point is
found to be unacceptable, additional compaction with or without
modification of the field moisture content as directed, shall be performed
and a second moisture - density determination made. This procedure shall
be repeated until satisfactory compaction is obtained. Under pavement
areas the upper 6 inches of subgrade soil and all base shall be compacted
to above 95 percent of maximum dry density.
7.5.1 Equipment: The contractor shall describe the type or types of
compaction equipment which he proposes to furnish for use under the
contract. If in the opinion of the site engineer, any proposed type is
considered unsuitable or inadequate, the contractor shall be required to
select and furnish an alternate approved type or demonstrate by field trial
conducted at his own expense that the originally proposed type will
perform in a satisfactory manner,
7.5.2 Moisture Content: Compaction shall be performed only when the
fill material is in an approved condition of moisture content. In the
absence of a specific waiver of these provisions, the approved condition
shall be in the range of 2% less to 1% more than the optimum moisture
content established by laboratory analysis.
Alpine Engineering Page 7
APPENDIX "B"
RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATION - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Moisture Content Continued:
The contractor shall furnish equipment for modifying the moisture content
of the fill material and at times when the moisture content is not within
the specified range, shall operate such equipment so as to achieve the
necessary correction with minimum loss of time. The addition of water
shall be accomplished by methods which . will distribute the added water
evenly and in a controlled manner over the fill. Reduction of the water
content shall be accomplished by :methods which are effective for
promoting aeration of the fill materiai.
8. TRANSITION LOTS:
Where transitions • between cut and fill occur, within a proposed building
pad, the cut portion shall be over - excavated a minimum of one foot below
the bottom of proposed foundations and recompacted as heretofore
specified.
9. PROTECTION OF FILL DURING CONSTRUCTION:
Despite the provisions of other sections . of this specification, layer
placement and thickness shall be so controlled that no ponding of water
can occur on any working surface. This shall be accomplished however,
without at any time exceeding the specified maximum layer thickness.
Grading operations shall be performed so as to insure unobstructed run-
off at all times from every point on the working surface.
10. SEASONAL LIMITS:
No fill material shall be placed, spread or rolled if weather conditions
increase the moisture content above permissible limits. When the work is
interrupted by rain, fill operations shall not be resumed until field tests
by the site engineer indicate that the moisture content and density of fill
are as previously specified.
Alpine Engineering Page 8
.- .,
VION/T1'AUP
' vnRCa2
L —T
18 -XXX TPM / CDP
1112 EOLUS AVENUE
f —T --I
gill
I
L -
-k - J
'r.g YT r-T J
LLOTTLLAYOUT
f f
1 � I
SECTIONS
m�W ^�. •rt
i'
emms.�as'.%
PERVIOUS PAVERS TYPICAL DETAIL
OWNER'S CERRFlCATE SHEET 7 OF 3
LES
f
SEC11ONA
I
-- BECTIONC --
F '
ao w-
EOLUS AVENUE- TYPICAL SECTION
TOPOGRAPHY
SETBACKS •r
.ieo -w M W
SHEETINDEY ti
ACCESS
ZONING INFO WTION
Wmw. ,w
UTRITIES�
aim. M.�.[*rNauni4� O(W
ENGINEER OF WORK
s
F 4 Yb A
ea Anuaa V
Ii�:.Fb:1C'1
SUBDMDEIM CERRFIWE
LEGEND
ABBRElMTEO LEGAL0E5�6IPMV
DENSITY CALCULATIONS
_
IANERNOUSAREA CALCULATIONS
SREADORESS
LES
f
SEC11ONA
I
-- BECTIONC --
F '
ao w-
EOLUS AVENUE- TYPICAL SECTION
TOPOGRAPHY
SETBACKS •r
.ieo -w M W
SHEETINDEY ti
ACCESS
ZONING INFO WTION
Wmw. ,w
UTRITIES�
aim. M.�.[*rNauni4� O(W
ENGINEER OF WORK
s
F 4 Yb A
ea Anuaa V
Ii�:.Fb:1C'1
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
1112 EOLUS AVENUE
APN.. 250-39138 ,
APN: 250,391 -39 .Q p..
e
_ \�
APN. 254-391-53 APN.* 2W91-54
a
0
S;ET20F3
I
I @
�I
I
I �
0
m 1
i
SLOPEANALYSIS
1112 EOLUS AVENUE
SUBJECTPROPERTY
GROSSARE4 =29,991 SF/0.69AC
AW. 2"l. IM
SHEET3OF3
z
W
0
NIN fNEtAffA•A,M, y /0. ®.I[
MUSCf NAb 6llii gflYAY.MIFS
RpJ 5gM11F
_
0
I.
ell
June 15. 2015
To:
City of Encinitas
Planning and Building Department
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, California 92024
7802 Hy8tla Ave, Enalnaaa, G rM - Ph M5604773
Email;_ eaamallaaan0a180araaka0ta .com'Webalal: ywmian81ap"Itactaxom
RE: Proposed use/Project ® 1112 Eolus Ave, Encinitas, CA 92024
-LOT 'B' WESTERLY LOT AREA PROPOSED WITH PANHANDLE TO NORTH
OF EASTERLY LOT GRO55/NET 15,490 S.F. WITH NEW TY40 STORY
51NGLE FAMILY DWELLING 4091 S.F. WITH ATTACHED TWO GAR
GARAGE 443 S.F., COVERED ENTRY 49 S.F., COVERED PATIO 334 S.F.
3
Oct. 3, 2018
- IBM Mai* Ave, Endnln, CA MU - PM 766&MM
Emell: Eebm ha mdkgowhbcb.com Webtir: rmr.erglepordllyde.Com
i
Project Name: 1112 Eolus Ave Residences
Case No. 18 -140 TPM /GDP. 18 -141 GDP
11 REVIEW CYCLE COMMENTS RESPONSES:
PLANNING COMMENTS RESPONSE- ATTACHEMNT A:
ITEM 1:
a. A 3rd additional Parking space is provided as an exterior space.
Dimensions have been added to the site plan A0.1.
-A
b. I have clarified and added existing and finished /proposed grade to
all the elevations. A legend has also been added to clarify abbreviations.
Refer to A2.0, A2.1 drawings.
c. I have added clarifications to the elevations for height. I lowered the
building by 6" to ensure that the building does not exceed the maximum
building heights. Please note that on the east and west elevations they
house may appear to be over the allowable height because a roof may be
in the distance. clarification for this can be seen on the North and
South Elevations. Refer to revised A2.0. 2.1.
d. The roof line that appears to exceed the 26' roof height is set back
from the face of the west wall so the grade is higher at the location
where the roof is tallest. for clarification, I added a dimension on the
west elevation for the height of the top of roof at the grade beyond.
Also if you look at the south elevation you can see that the roof slopes
back from the west and the roof is within the allowable building height
based on the adjacent grade where the roof is at its tallest point.
teat Hygda Rw, Endnem, CA 82124. Ph 780.5308773 .
I
' I - Emall: debomh@aand1e8earthbch.1em WeMlte: wew,aandlego"bcts.com
ENGINEERING COMMENT5 RE5PON5E- ATTACHEMNT S:
ITEM 1: Refer to updated grading plans and Civil Engineers response. Public
improvement has also been added on both Site plans A0.1.
ITEM5 2 -6: Refer to updated grading plans and Civil Engineers response.
ITEM 't: Refer to updated grading plans and Civil Engineers response. Note
has also been added on both Site plans A0.1.
ITEM 5:. Note has also been added on both Site plans A0.1.
FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENT5 RESPONSE- ATTACHEMNT C:
ITEM 1,2: Refer to updated grading plans and civil Engineers response.
WATER DISTRICT COMMENTS RE5PON5E- ATTACHEMNTD:
ITEM 1 a, b: Refer to updated grading plans and Civil Engineers response.
2
PASCO LARET SCOTER
- -, -_- & ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING + LAND SURVEYING
October 2, 2018
City of Encinitas
18 -140 TPM
1 1 12 Eolus Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
RE: RESPONSE TO FIRE DEPT. COMMENTS
PLSA Job #2881 -01
Confirm width of driveway in relation to the drainage. Existing cross section B on
grading plans doesn't appear to be consistent with plan view driveway. Is the
drainage within the 16ft?
Response: Cross section B has been updated. The driveway width, including the
gutter portion of the SDRSD G -02 curb and gutter, is 16 feet wide. The 16 feet
does not include the 0.5' wide raised curb. See sheets 1, and 2 of the civil plans.
2. Driveway exceeds 15% (shows 18 %) and shall comply with grade requirements -
PCC with heavy broom finish for traction.
Response: The driveway grades have been reduced to 14% and under to
comply with the requirements of the proposed pervious paver drive aisle.
PASCO LARET SUITER
& ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING r LAND PLANNING t LAND SURVEYING
October 2, 2018 PLSA Job #2881 -01
City of Encinitas
18 -140 TPM
1112 Eolus Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
RE: RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS
The applicant shall provide public improvements along the frontage to Eolus Avenue
to include pavement widening to 12 feet from center line and the installation of two
Tx25' (42' if tandem) pervious paver parking spaces bordered on all sides by a
6 "x16" PCC flush curb. The parkway area shall be homeowner maintained
landscaping or groundcover. The applicant shall record an Encroachment
Maintenance and Removal covenant to ensure the perpetual maintenance of the
improvements in the right -of -way.
Response: A new Tx42' pervious paver parking area has been added to the
project frontage along Eolus Avenue, see sheet 2 of civil plans.
2. This site receives stormwater runoff from a portion of Eolus Avenue. The applicant
shall capture this historic runoff and safely convey it through the site.
Response: The proposed basins on both parcels 1 and 2 have been resized and
made larger for an increase in captured stormwater volume and storage. The soil
layer is 12" and 24" of gravel. The surface depth of the basin has increased to
1.3'.
The project is located within the Leucadia Wastewater District sphere of influence,
and will need to be annexed into the District prior to serving each parcel. Show each
sewer lateral and note if a pump will be necessary.
Response: Understood, sewer lateral for parcel 2 will require a pump. Sheet 2 of
the civil plans note the lateral will need to be a private forced sewer lateral.
4. The applicant shall provide stormwater quality treatment facilities to collect and treat
the runoff generated by all new and /or removed and replaced impervious surfaces.
Additionally, any increase in runoff resulting from an increase in impervious surface
shall be mitigated by sizing and designing the IMP facilities to the HMP sizing
requirements with a lower flow threshold of 0.5102 to ensure no net increase in cross
lot drainage. The treatment facility IMPs shall be located entirely within private
property. The cross section of the IMP facility on the Site Plan shall show 10" of
ponding. This facility shall be sized on the site plan for an effective area equal to
9.0% of the factored impervious surface area. Calculations shall be shown on the
site plan and in the hydrology study.
Response: The area of the both basins have been resized to equal
approximately 9% of the proposed hardscape. The new area calculations of each
basin and proposed impervious areas can been seen in the revised hydrology
study.
5. Cross lot drainage currently exists to the parcel to the west. A Hold Harmless for
Drainage Agreement will be required with the grading permit, however no increase in
cross lot drainage will be allowed.
Response: Understood.
6. The project shall provide an energy dissipation and spreading feature for the
proposed bioretention basins so that the overflow from the basins is evenly spread
across the entire length of the basin. The basin for Parcel 1 shall be conveyed to
the basin in Parcel 2 (by pipe is acceptable with private drainage easement).
Response: A new 6" PVC pipe will convey water from the overflow on parcel 1 to
an energy dissipator on parcel 2. An easement has also been added to the south
side of parcel 2 to allow for the conveyance.
7. The existing survey monuments shall be referenced on the grading plan and shall be
protected in- place. If any monument is disturbed or destroyed it shall be replaced by
a licensed land surveyor and a Corner Record or Record of Survey shall be filed with
the County prior to release of securities.
Response: Notes added, see sheet 2 of civil plans
8. The overhead service lines to the building shall be constructed underground. Place
a note on all versions of the site plan.
Response: Understood.
9. The project proposes 9,973 SF of impervious surface area, which is just shy of the
PDP threshold of 10,000 SF. Special Inspection will be required verifying the
impervious surface areas by field survey prior to occupancy. Since the basins are
already sized for HMP and there are Type B soils, only a SWMA would be required
to bring project into compliance.
Response: Understood.
WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET
Prepared by California Landscape Technologies
Steven Sherman, PLA #2887
Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) _42.5_ 1112 Eolus Lot A 9 -27 -18
Hydrozone #
(Planting
Description'
Plant
Factor (PF)
Irrigation
Method
Irrigation
Efficiency
IE `
ETAF
(PFAE)
Landscape
Area (sq, It)
ETAF z Area
Estimated Total
Water Use
ETWU'
Regular Landscape Areas
Low Shrubs
Basin
0.3
Spray
0.75
0.40
928
371.20
9,781
0.0
-
-
-
-
-
0.0
0.0
-
-
-
'Non- Irrigated areas not
included in talcs.
Totals
928
371.20
9,781
Special Landscape Areas
1
0
0
0
1
1
Totals
0
0
0
ETWU Total
9,781
Maximum Allowed Water Allowance (MAWA)
11,004
°Hydrozone VIPlarding Descdpdon
E.g
1.) front lawn
2.) low water use plantings
3.) medium water use planting
'Irrigation Method
overhead spray
or drip
*MA WA (Annual Gallons Allowed) = (Efo) ( 0.62)1 (ETA F x LA)
+ ((1 -ETAF) x SLA)J
where 0.62 is a conversion factor that converts acre -
inches per acre per year to gallons per square fool per
year, LA is the total landscape area in square feet, SLA
is the total special landscape area in square feet,
and ETAF is .55 for residential areas and 0.45 for non-
residential areas.
ETAF Calculations
Regular Landscape Areas
Total ETAF x Area
(B)
371.20
Total Area
(A)
928
Average ETAF
B + A
.40
All Landscape Areas
`Irrigation Efficiency °E7WU(Annual Gallons Required) _
0.75 for spray head Eto x 0.62 x ETAF x Area
0.81 for drip where 0.62 is a conversion
factor that converts acre -
inches per acre per year to
gallons per square foot per
year.
Average ETAF for Regular Landscape Areas must
be 0.55 or below for residential areas, and 0.45 or
below for non - residential areas.
Total ETAF x Area
(B +D)
371.20
Total Area
(A +C)
928
SltewideETAF
(B +D) +(A +C)
.40
A copy of this form may be obtained from Department of Water Resources website:
http://www.water.ca.gov/wateruseefficiency/landscapeordinance/
WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET
Prepared by California Landscape Technologies
Steven Sherman, PLA #2887
Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) _42.5_ 1112 Eolus Lot A 9 -27 -18
Hydrozone R
/Planting
Description'
Plant
Factor (PF)
Irrigation
Method
Irrigation
Efficiency
IE `
ETAF
(PF/IE)
Landscape
Area (sq, ft,)
ETAF x Area
Estimated Total
Water Use
ETWU'
Regular Landscape Areas
Low Shrubs
Basin
0.3
Spray
0.75
0.40
928
371.20
9,781
0.0
-
-
-
0.0
0.0
'Non4rrigated areas not
included in talcs.
Totals
928
371.20
9,781
Special Landscape Areas
1
0
0
0
1
1
Totals
0
0
0
ETWU Total
9,781
Maximum Allowed Water Allowance (MAWA)
11,004
'Hydrozone APlanting Description
E.g
1.) front lawn
2.) low water use plantings
3.) medium water use planting
'Irrigation Method
overhead spray
or drip
° ALA WA (Annual Gallons Allowed) = (Efo) ( 0.62) ( (ETAF x LA)
+ ((1 -ETAF) x SLA))
Mere 0.62 is a conversion factor that converts acre -
inches per acre per year to gallons per square foot per
year, LA is the total landscape area in square feet, SLA
is the total special landscape area in square feet,
and ETAF is .55 for residential areas and 0.45 for non-
residential areas.
ETAF Calculations
Regular Landscape Areas
Total ETAF x Area
(B)
371.20
Total Area
(A)
928
Average ETAF
B +A
.40
All Landscape Areas
`Irrigation Efficiency °ETWU(Annual Gallons Required)
0.75 for spray head Eto x 0.62 x ETAF x Area
0.81 for drip where 0.62 is a conversion
factor that converts acre -
inches per acre per year to
gallons per square foot per
year.
Average ETAF for Regular Landscape Areas must
be 0.55 or below for residential areas, and 0.45 or
below for non - residential areas.
Total ETAF x Area
(B +D)
371.20
Total Area
(A +C)
928
Sitewide ETAF
(B +D) +(A+C)
.40
A copy of this form may be obtained from Department of Water Resources website:
hftp://www.water.ca.gov/wateruseefficiency/landscapeordinance/
WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET
Prepared by California Landscape Technologies
Steven Sherman, PLA #2887
Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) _42.5_ 1112 Eolus Lot A 9 -27 -18
Hydrozone #
/Planting
Description'
Plant
Factor (PF)
Irrigation
Method
Irrigation
Efficiency
IE `
ETAF
(PRIE)
Landscape
Area (sq, ft,)
ETAF x Area
Estimated Total
Water Use
ETWU'
Regular Landscape Areas
Low Shrubs
Basin
0.3
Spray
0.75
0.40
928
371.20
9,781
0.0
-
-
-
0.0
0.0
-
•Non- Irrigated areas not
included in talcs.
Totals
928
371.20
9,781
Special Landscape Areas
1
0
0
0
1
1
Totals
0
0
0
ETWU Total
9,781
Maximum Allowed
Water Allowance (MAWA)
11,004
° Hydrozone #/Planting Description
E.g
1.) front lawn
2.) low water use plantings
3.) medium water use planting
'Irrigation Method
overhead spray
or drip
MA WA (Annual Gallons Allowed) = (Eto) ( 0.62) f (ETAF x LA)
+ ((1 -ETAF) x SLA)]
where 0.62 is a conversion factor that converts acre -
inches per acre per year to gallons per square foot per
year, LA is the total landscape area in square feet, SLA
is the total special landscape area in square feet,
and ETAF is .55 for residential areas and 0.45 for non-
residential areas.
ETAF Calculations
Regular Landscape Areas
Total ETAF x Area
(B)
371.20
Total Area
(A)
928
Average ETAF
B +A
.40
All Landscape Areas
`Irrigation Efficiency °ETWU (Annual Gallons Required) _
0.75 for spray head Eto x 0.62 x ETAF x Area
0.81 for drip where 0.62 is a conversion
factor that converts acre -
inches per acre per year to
gallons per square foot per
year.
Average ETAF for Regular Landscape Areas must
be 0.55 or below for residential areas, and 0.45 or
below for non - residential areas.
Total ETAF x Area
(B +D)
371.20
Total Area
(A +C)
928
SltewldeETAF
(B +D) +(A+C)
.40
A copy of this form may be obtained from Department of Water Resources website:
hftp://www.water.ca.gov/wateruseefficiency/landscapeordinance/
WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET
Prepared by California Landscape Technologies
Steven Sherman, PLA #2887
Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) _42.5_ 1112 Eolus Lot A 9 -27 -18
Hydrozone #
/Planting
Description'
Plant
Factor (PF)
Irrigation
Method °
IMgation
Efficiency
IE `
ETAF
(PFIIE)
Landscape
Area (sq, 1t,)
ETAF x Area
Estimated Total
Water Use
ETWU'
Regular Landscape Areas
Low Shrubs
Basin
0.3
Spray
0.75
0.40
928
371.20
9,781
0.0
-
-
-
-
-
0.0
0.0
-
•Non-irrigated areas not
included in talcs.
Totals
928
371.20
9,781
Special Landscape Areas
1
0
0
0
1
1
Totals
0
0
0
ETWU Total
9,781
Maximum Allowed Water Allowance (MAWA)Q
11,004
Hydrozone #/ P/anting Description
E.g
1.) front lawn
2.) low water use plantings
3.) medium water use planting
'Irrigation Method `Irrigation Efficiency
overhead spray 0.75 for spray head
or drip 0.81 fordrip
*MA WA (Annual Gallons Allowed) _ (Efo) ( 0.62) ((ETAF x LA)
+ ((1 -ETAF) x SLA)J
where 0.62 is a conversion factor that converts acre -
inches per acre per year to gallons per square foot per
year, LA is the total landscape area in square feet, SLA
is the total special landscape area in square feet,
and ETAF is .55 for residential areas and 0.45 for non-
residential areas.
ETAF Calculations
Regular Landscape Areas
Total ETAF x Area
(B)
371.20
Total Area
(A)
928
Average ETAF
B + A
.40
All Landscape Areas
°ETWU(Annual Gallons Required)
Eto x 0.62 x ETAF x Area
where 0.62 is a conversion
factor that converts acre -
inches per acre per year to
gallons per square foot per
year.
Average ETAF for Regular Landscape Areas must
be 0.55 or below for residential areas, and 0.45 or
below for non - residential areas.
Total ETAF x Area
(B +D)
371.20
Total Area
(A +C)
928
SitewldeETAF
(B +D) +(A+C)
.40
A copy of this form may be obtained from Department of Water Resources website:
hftp://www.water.ca.gov/wateruseefficiency/landscapeordinance/
HYDROLOGY STUDY
FOR
1112 EOLUS AVENUE
GRADING PLAN
18 -140 TPM /CDP
CITY OF ENCINITAS, CA
PREPARED FOR:
TOURMALINE PROPERTIES, INC.
944 ARCHER STREET
SAN DIEGO, CA 92109
(858) 431 -6102
PREPARED BY:
PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
535 N. HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
(858) 259 -8212
Prepared: June 14, 2018
Revised: October 2, 2018
TYLER G. LAWSON, RCE 80356 DATE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PLSA 2881 -01
SECTION
Executive Summary
1.0
Introduction
1.1
Existing Conditions
1.2
Proposed Project
1.3
Conclusions
1.4
References
1.5
Methodology 2.0
Introduction 2.1
County of San Diego Criteria 2.2
City of Encinitas Standards 2.3
Runoff Coefficient Determination 2.4
Hydrology & Hydraulic Model Output 3.0
Pre - Developed Hydrologic Calculations (100 -Year Event) 3.1
Post - Developed Hydrologic Calculations (100 -Year Event) 3.2
Detention Analysis (100 -Year Event) 3.3
Appendix 4.0
PLSA 2881 -01
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 Introduction
This Hydrology Study for the proposed development at 1112 Eolus Avenue has been
prepared to analyze the hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics of the existing and
proposed project site. This report intends to present both the methodology and the
calculations used for determining the runoff from the project site in both the pre-
developed (existing) conditions and the post - developed (proposed) conditions produced
by the 100 -year, 6 -hour storm event.
' 1.2 Existing Conditions
' The subject property is located along Eolus Avenue, just south of the intersection of E.
Glaucus Street and Eolus Avenue, in the City of Encinitas. The site is bound by existing
residential developments to the north, south, and west of the property, and Eolus Avenue
' to the east of the property. The current site consists of an existing single- family
residence, driveway, detached shed, and various hardscape and landscape improvements
typically associated with residential development. The project site is located in the
Carlsbad Hydrologic Area, and, more specifically, the San Marcos Creek Hydrologic
Sub -Area (904.51).
' The existing site generally slopes from Eolus Avenue to the western property line, with
the low point of the site located in the property's northwest corner. There does not seem
to be an existing storm drain system to convey drainage, and runoff from the existing site
appears to sheet flow onto the adjacent property to the west. Existing Eolus Avenue to
the east is a superelevated road sloping slightly towards the property. Based on the field
topography survey performed by Pasco, Laret, Suiter & Associates, it appears the
' existing residential properties to the south and west slope away from the property line and
prevent offsite drainage from entering the site, the property to the north slopes in a
similar direction as the subject property. The existing parcel to the west is at a lower
t elevation than the subject property, and currently accepts runoff from the subject property
immediately adjacent to the east.
In the current condition, the project site is approximately 0.69 acres in area and is 14.0%
impervious. Per the Web Soil Survey application available through the United States
Department of Agriculture, the subject property is generally categorized to have group B
' soils. Using the existing impervious area of the entire site an onsite pre- development
runoff coefficient of 0.34 was calculated using the methodology described in section
3.1.2 of the San Diego County Hydrology Manual and the formula provided therein.
' Using the Rational Method Procedure outlined in the San Diego County Hydrology
Manual, a peak flow rate and time of concentration were calculated for the 100 -year, 6-
hour storm event. For the existing drainage basin A, the peak flow rate for the 100 -year,
' 6 -hour storm was determined to be 1.54 cfs at the northwest corner point of discharge
from the site with a time of concentration of 5.0 minutes (the minimum time of
concentration of 5.0 minutes per the San Diego County Hydrology Manual was selected
1
Page l of 12
' PLSA 288 1 -01
for a project this size to maximize rainfall intensity). Refer to pre - development
hydrology calculations included in Section 3.1 of this report for a detailed analysis of the
' existing drainage basins, as well as a pre - development hydrology node map included in
Appendix A of this report for pre- development drainage basin delineation and discharge
locations.
' 1.3 Proposed Project
The proposed project includes the demolition of all existing onsite improvements and the
construction of two single - family residences along with new driveways, landscaping, and
hardscape improvements. Site grading along with road, drainage, retaining wall, and
utility improvements typical of single- family residential development will also be
constructed. There are several steps in the proposed buildings, with the pad elevations
ranging from 159.3 to 158.3 on Parcel 1, and 146.3 to 145.3 on Parcel 2.
' In the resulting post - developed condition, runoff will be directed away from the proposed
building towards landscaped swales, which will convey runoff west through the site to a
' The proposed project site is approximately 0.69 acres and is 33% impervious. The
proposed drainage basin A will mimic existing drainage patterns. Storm water will be
conveyed from east to west and ultimately reach one of the bioretention basins prior to
' continuing west onto adjacent properties. Based on the proposed impervious area of the
entire site as well as onsite hydrologic soil type, a runoff coefficient of 0.47 was
calculated using the methodology described in section 3.1.2 of the San Diego County
Hydrology Manual and the formula provided therein. Using the Rational Method
Procedure outlined in the San Diego County Hydrology Manual, a peak flow rate and
time of concentration were calculated for a 100 -year, 6 -hour storm event. For the
Page 2 of 12
BMP bioretention basin location. Each parcel will contain a proposed BMP bioretention
basin. Basins will be located in the rear yard of the corresponding parcel. Proposed
landscaped swales will convey runoff generated by pervious areas and roof drains around
'
the buildings and toward one of the basins. Runoff generated by the proposed driveway
on Parcel 1 will be collected in a trench drain and routed to the south of the property and
around landscaped areas. Ultimately water collected in the drain will discharge into the
tBMP
on Parcel 1 through a PVC drain pipe system. Additionally, a proposed private
drive made of pervious pavers will provide access to Parcel 2 and conveys excess storm
water to the BMP basin toward the rear of Parcel 2.
'
The proposed onsite drainage improvements will mimic the existing site condition and
'
continue to discharge across the neighboring property to the west. However, the BMP
basins have been sized with enough surface area to comply with City of Encinitas storm
water standards for water quality and provide detention volume in the form of surface
ponding as well as in the soil layers to mitigate peak runoff to pre - development
conditions prior to leaving the site. A rip rap energy dissipater has also been provided to
further reduce discharge velocity leaving the site when the basin overflows. Refer to
calculations included in Section 3.3 of this report for further discussion and analysis of
numeric sizing for flood control and pollutant control BMPs.
' The proposed project site is approximately 0.69 acres and is 33% impervious. The
proposed drainage basin A will mimic existing drainage patterns. Storm water will be
conveyed from east to west and ultimately reach one of the bioretention basins prior to
' continuing west onto adjacent properties. Based on the proposed impervious area of the
entire site as well as onsite hydrologic soil type, a runoff coefficient of 0.47 was
calculated using the methodology described in section 3.1.2 of the San Diego County
Hydrology Manual and the formula provided therein. Using the Rational Method
Procedure outlined in the San Diego County Hydrology Manual, a peak flow rate and
time of concentration were calculated for a 100 -year, 6 -hour storm event. For the
Page 2 of 12
PLSA 2881 -01
proposed drainage basin A, the peak flow rate for the 100 -year, 6 -hour storm was
determined to be 2.14 cfs leaving the northwest corner of the site with a time of
concentration of 5.0 minutes. The peak flow rates for the 100 -year, 6 -hour storm are
calculated as a result of the proposed increase in impervious area, and do not take into
account the effects of site design or source control techniques implemented to reduce
velocity and volume of runoff. Refer to post- development hydrology calculations
included in Section 3.2 of this report for a detailed analysis of the onsite drainage basin,
as well as a post- development hydrology node map included in Appendix A of this report
for drainage basin delineation and discharge locations.
In an effort to comply with the City of Encinitas storm water standards, the proposed site
has incorporated various source control and site design techniques required of all
development projects to optimize the site layout. Runoff from proposed roofs and
hardscape areas will be directed to vegetated swales in an effort to disperse drainage to
pervious surfaces. The swales will assist in removing sediment and particulate -bound
pollutants from storm water as it is conveyed toward the bioretention area. The proposed
BMP basins will further assist in decreasing peak runoff by infiltrating a portion of the
generated volume of runoff. The water produced by higher intensity storm events will
overflow a low point located in the BMP area and will continue offsite, maintaining the
existing cross -lot drainage scenario but mitigating peak runoff to pre - development
conditions.
1.4 Conclusions
Based upon the analysis included in this report, the proposed onsite storm water
bioretention system would accommodate the increase in peak runoff as a result of the
proposed development in order to ensure that increased storm water flows from the
subject property do not cause additional impacts to downstream properties or existing
drainage facilities. Additional analysis and design are included in this report to verify
that the proposed project is in compliance with current flood control and storm water
quality regulations. A hydromodification management plan is not required at this time as
this project is not a priority development project.
Page 3 of 12
PLSA 2881 -01
1 1.5 References
"San Diego County Hydrology Manual °, revised June 2003, County of San Diego,
Department of Public Works, Flood Control Section.
' "San Diego County Hydraulic Design Manual ", revised October 2012, County of San
Diego, Department of Public Works, Flood Control Section
"Model BMP Design Manual San Diego Region", rev. February 2016, County of San
Diego
"Loin Impact Development Handbook — Stormwater Management Strategies ", revised
July 2014, County of San Diego, Department of Public Works
' Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of
Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at httn: / /yVebso i I SU rVCV. n rc S. USd tl. 110 V.
Accessed November 3, 2015
1
Page 4 of 12
PLSA 288 1 -01
2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Introduction
The hydrologic model used to perform the hydrologic analysis presented in this report
utilizes the Rational Method (RM) equation, Q = CIA. The RM formula estimates the
peak rate of runoff based on the variables of area, runoff coefficient, and rainfall
intensity. The rainfall intensity (I) is equal to:
I = 7.44 x Pe x D -0.645
' Where:
I = Intensity (in/hr)
P6 = 6 -hour precipitation (inches)
D = duration (minutes — use Tc)
Using the Time of Concentration (Tc), which is the time required for a given element of
water that originates at the most remote point of the basin being analyzed to reach the
' point at which the runoff from the basin is being analyzed. The RM equation determines
the storm water runoff rate (Q) for a given basin in terms of flow (typically in cubic feet
per second (cfs) but sometimes as gallons per minute (gpm)). The RM equation is as
follows:
Q = CIA
Where:
Q= flow (in cfs)
C = runoff coefficient, ratio of rainfall that produces storm water
runoff (runoff vs. infiltration /evaporation /absorption/etc)
I = average rainfall intensity for a duration equal to the Tc for the
area, in inches per hour.
A = drainage area contributing to the basin in acres.
' The RM equation assumes that the storm event being analyzed delivers precipitation to
the entire basin uniformly, and therefore the peak discharge rate will occur when a
raindrop that falls at the most remote portion of the basin arrives at the point of analysis.
The RM also assumes that the fraction of rainfall that becomes runoff or the runoff
coefficient C is not affected by the storm intensity, 1, or the precipitation zone number.
Page 5 of 12
PLSA 288 1 -01
2.2 County of San Diego Criteria
As defined by the County Hydrology Manual dated June 2003, the rational method is the
preferred equation for determining the hydrologic characteristics of basins up to
approximately one square mile in size. The County of San Diego has developed its own
tables, nomographs, and methodologies for analyzing storm water runoff for areas within
the county. The County has also developed precipitation isopluvial contour maps that
show even lines of rainfall anticipated from a given storm event (i.e. 100 -year, 6 -hour
storm).
One of the variables of the RM equation is the runoff coefficient, C. The runoff
coefficient is dependent only upon land use and soil type and the County of San Diego
has developed a table of Runoff Coefficients for Urban Areas to be applied to basin
located within the County of San Diego. The table categorizes the land use, the
associated development density (dwelling units per acre) and the percentage of
impervious area. Each of the categories listed has an associated runoff coefficient, C, for
each soil type class.
The County has also illustrated in detail the methodology for determining the time of
concentration, in particular the initial time of concentration. The County has adopted the
Federal Aviation Agency's (FAA) overland time of flow equation. This equation
essentially limits the flow path length for the initial time of concentration to lengths under
100 feet, and is dependent on land use and slope. The time of concentration minimum is
5 minutes per the County of San Diego requirements.
2.3 City of Encinitas Standards
The City of Encinitas has additional requirements for hydrology reports which are
outlined in the Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. Please refer to this
manual for further details.
2.4 Runoff Coefficient Determination
As stated in section 2.2, the runoff coefficient is dependent only upon land use and soil
type and the County of San Diego has developed a table of Runoff Coefficients for Urban
Areas to be applied to basin located within the County of San Diego. The table, included
at the end of this section, categorizes the land use, the associated development density
(dwelling units per acre) and the percentage of impervious area.
Page 6 of 12
1
3.0 HYDROLOGY MODEL OUTPUT
3.1 Pre - Developed Hydrologic Model Output (100 -Year Event)
Pre - Development:
Q = CIA
Ptoo= 2.5
Existing Drainage Basin A
Total Area = 29,991 sf 4 0.69 Acres
Impervious Area = 4,292 sf 4 0.01 Acres
Pervious Area = 25.699 sf 4 0.68 Acres
PLSA 288 1 -01
*Rational Method Equation
*I 00-Year, 6 -Hour Precipitation
Cn, Weighted Runoff Coefficient
- 0.25, Cn value for natural ground, Type B soils
* Per San Diego Hydrology Design Manual ( SDHDM) Section 3.1.2
- 0.9, C value for developed / impervious surface
* Per SDHDM Section 3.1.2
Cn = 0.9 x 4,292 sf + 0.25 x 25,699 sf = 0.34
29,991 sf
Cn = 0.34
Tc= 5.0min
P6 = 2.5
1 = 7.44 x P6 x D` .145
1 = 7.44 x 2.5 x 5 .0-0.641 z 6.59 in/hr
Loo—z 6.59 in/hr
' Total Area = 29,991 sf 4 0.69 Acres
C = 0.34
1 = 6.59 in /hr
*Use minimum Tc of 5.0 min per SDCHM
*See Node Map for Delineation
Qioo = 0.34 x 6.59 in /hr x 0.69 Ac = 1.54 cfs
Page 7 of 12
3.2 Post - Developed Hydrologic Model Output (100 -Year Event)
Post - Development (without considering BMP treatment /infiltration):
Q = CIA
Pioo =2.5
Proposed Drainage Basin A
Total Area = 29,991 sf 4 0.69 Acres
Impervious Area = 9,973 sf 4 0.23 Acres
Pervious Area = 20,259 sf 4 0.46 Acres
PLSA 288 1 -01
*Rational Method Equation
*I 00-Year, 6 -Hour Precipitation
Cn, Weighted Runoff Coefficient
- 0.25, Cn value for natural ground, Type B soils
* Per San Diego Hydrology Design Manual ( SDHDM) Section 3.1.2
- 0.9, C value for developed / impervious surface
* Per SDHDM Section 3.1.2
Cn = 0.9 x 9,973 sf + 0.25 x 20,259 sf = 0.47
29,991 sf
laffI
Tc= 5.Omin
P6 = 2.5
1= 7.44xP6xD -0.641
= 7.44 x 2.5 x 5.0-1.641 z 6.59 in/hr
Loo 6.59 in/hr
Total Area = 29,991 sf 4 0.69 Acres
C = 0.47
1= 6.59 in /hr
*Use minimum Tc of 5.0 min per SDCHM
Qioo = 0.47 x 6.59 in /hr x 0.69 Ac = 2.14 efs
*See Node Map for Delineation
Pre - Development vs. Post - Development (Prior to Detention /BMP)
Pre - Development (Basin A)
Qioo = 1.54 cfs
Post - Development (Basin A)
Qioo = 2.14 cfs
A(Basin A)
0.6 cfs
Page 8 of 12
PLSA 288 1 -01
' 3.3 Detention Analysis (100 -Year Event)
' The bioretention basin provides pollutant control as well as mitigation of the 100 -year, 6-
hour storm event peak flow rate. The 100 -year storm event detention analysis was
performed using the County of San Diego Hydrology Manual and Equation 6 -1 provided
therein.
The bioretention facilities consists of 2 basins. Each basin contains 12 inches of
a engineered soil and 24 inches of gravel. The treatment surface for the proposed basins
are 480 sf each, corresponding to over 9.0% of the project's proposed impervious area.
Runoff will be biofiltered through the engineered soil and gravel layers, where it will
' then infiltrate into the surrounding soil. No underdrain system is currently proposed. In
larger storm events, runoff not filtered through the engineered soil and gravel layers will
overflow the bioretention basins at a designated low point along the western property
lines of the developed parcels, bypass treatment, and continue offsite as it does in the
existing condition.
Based on the results of the detention analysis, the bioretention facility provides mitigation
for the 100 -year, 6 -hour storm event by detaining the difference in volume generated as a
result of the proposed development when compared to pre - development conditions. The
total volume produced by the 100 -year, 6 -hour storm event for drainage basin A is 2,943
cubic feet, compared to 2,129 cubic feet in the pre - project condition. The bioretention
basins provide a total of 2,881 cubic feet of volume on the surface and in the engineered
soil / gravel layers, which is sufficient to mitigate for the increase in impervious area.
Refer to Section 3.3.1 below for calculations used to substantiate this analysis.
3.3.1 Detention Volume Calculations (100 -Year Event)
Pre - Development: 100 -Year Event (Basin A)
Volume = C *P6 *A *Per SDCHM
' Volume = 0.34 * (2.5 in * 1 ft / 12 in) * (0.69 Ac * 43,560 SF / 1 Ac) = 2,129 CF
Post- Development: 100 -Year Event (Basin A)
' Volume = C *P6 *A *Per SDCHM
Volume = 0.47 * (2.5 in * 1 ft / 12 in) * (0.69 Ac * 43,560 SF / 1 Ac) = 2,943 CF
Required Detention Volume = Total Post - Development — Total Pre - Development
t = Prop Basin A — Pre Basin A
= 2,943 CF — 2,129 CF = 814 CF
' + 814 CF storage required for drainage basin A
Total Detention Volume Provided = 2,881 CF >= 814 CF -> Therefore, OK
1
Page 9 of 12
1
PLSA 288 1 -01
*See basin stage
- storage volume calculation provided below
'
BMP Stage - Storage - Soil Volume
BMP Stage - Storage
- Surface Volume
Stage Total
Stage
Total
B asin Area
Basin Area
Elevation
Volume Volume
Elevation
Volume
Volume
(q ) s ft
(sq -ft)
'
(cu -ft) (cu -ft)
(cu -ft)
(cu -ft)
146.00 480
0 0 'Bottom Gravel
149.0
480
0
0 'Treatment Surface
146.25 480
48.0 48.0
149.1
508.5
49.4
49.4
146.50 480
48.0 96.0
149.2
536.9
52.3
101.7
146.75 480
48.0 144.0
149.3
565.4
55.1
156.8
147.00 480
48.0 192.0
149.4
593.8
58.0
214.8
147.25 480
48.0 240.0
149.5
622.3
60.8
275.6
'
147.50 480
48.0 288.0
149.6
650.8
63.7
339.2
147.75 480
48.0 336.0
149.7
679.2
66.5
405.7
148.00 480
48.0 384.0 'Bottom Eng Soil
149.8
707.7
69.3
475.1
148.25 480
48.0 432.0
149.9
736.2
72.2
547.3
148.50 480
48.0 480.0
150.0
764.6
75.0
622.3
148.75 480
48.0 528.0
150.1
793.1
77.9
700.2
'
149.00 480
48.0 576.0 'Treatment Surface
150.2
821.5
80.7
780.9
150.3
850.0
83.6
864.5 "Elevation of Weir
Note: Soil and gravel layers assume 40% void ratio for storage
Figure 1: Basin Volume
Calculations Parcel 1
BMP Stage - Storage - Soil Volume
BMP Stage - Storage
- Surface Volume
Stage Total
Stage
Total
'
Basin Area
Basin Area
Elevation
Volume Volume
Elevation
Volume
Volume
s f[
(q )
(sq -ft)
(cu -ft) (cu -ft)
(cu -ft)
(cu -ft)
139.00 480
0 0 'Bottom Gravel
142.0
480
0
0 'Treatment Surface
139.25 480
48.0 48.0
142.1
508.5
49.4
49.4
139.50 480
48.0 96.0
142.2
536.9
52.3
101.7
139.75 480
48.0 144.0
142.3
565.4
55.1
156.8
'
140.00 480
48.0 192.0
142.4
593.8
58.0
214.8
140.25 480
48.0 240.0
142.5
622.3
60.8
275.6
140.50 480
48.0 288.0
142.6
650.8
63.7
339.2
140.75 480
48.0 336.0
142.7
679.2
66.5
405.7
'
141.00 480
48.0 384.0 "Bottom Eng Soil
142.8
707.7
69.3
475.1
141.25 480
48.0 432.0
142.9
736.2
72.2
547.3
141.50 480
48.0 480.0
143.0
764.6
75.0
622.3
'
141.75 480
48.0 528.0
143.1
793.1
77.9
700.2
142.00 480
48.0 576.0 'Treatment Surface
1412
821.5
80.7
780.9
143.3
850.0
83.6
864.5 'Elevation of Weir
Note: Soil and gravel layers assume 40% void ratio for storage
'
Figure 2: Basin Volume
Calculations Parcel 2
Total Detention
Volume = Parcel 1 BMP Volume
+ Parcel 2
BMP Volume
Parcel 1 BMP
Volume = 576 CF + 864.5 CF = 1,440.5 CF
'
Parcel 2 BMP
Volume = 576 CF + 864.5 CF =
1,440.5 CF
Total Detention Volume = 2,881 CF
Page 10 of 12
PLSA 288 1 -01
3.3.2 Storm Water Quality Calculations / Surface Area
Parcel 1
Proposed Onsite Impervious Area = 5,082 SF
Min. Required BMP Surface Area = 0.09 *H.S. (9.0% Per C.O.E Request)
= 0.09 *5,082 = 458 SF
Proposed BMP foot print = 480 SF > 458 SF -> Therefore, OK
Parcel 2
Proposed Onsite Impervious Area = 4,891 SF
Min. Required BMP Surface Area = 0.09 *H.S. (9.0% Per C.O.E Request)
= 0.09 *4,891 = 440 SF
Proposed BMP foot print = 480 SF > 440 SF -> Therefore, OK
Page 11 of 12
' PLSA 2881 -01
1 4.0 APPENDIX
Page 12 of 12
j
-1-133-3
' I
1-
�-
�
I
-'�
H33
LL
'-
=
132
_
-
I t
T
IIrI Orange-
County;.
i _:
LI�I I I l I I
(--
i -1�I
ri i� -I- L1. -�
-L IJT_LTfT'
r33 °15' I
_I_VJ
II J-
�_L
-
��
°00
I )_
f
I �� I
°451 1 I _
—� —= —�
32 °30 -
�-
-I- r-� -j-
fT
� • ' ._j._' /t I I !t(�+
I--- TI-Jf�f'.t Vy�.
I_i -,�
_ �-r r_
fiI ITI t
y
I
_l~� 1 I - I -I�
I � ENCI-{NI -T}A -S
- -- �__
I I n 1 1 SOLANA BEACH '
I i
THE n DEL MAR+�T
I �
I_
l i I !_
III 1 I I
T_
�
-
L s
� 1; ,-T r -. � I _'
r -
!._� -� r- t
T I
� ° 1 , ~ y� _
r
Lf }[_ ! •
I 1 .( -1- • —.;
I- r�
`? -- {j - °�I— I
r h; ICI • I ( i I_
-
f `" L-1 ''-
1 _ SC IDS'
TI �• I
/ ra •- -, l� '"
lT�;:1 I. I• T�l'i
''I L _ I- POW
1
i� j� �y
j �__ ,
I I� I I i�• -•
-• I� p-
,_ ., I I_, ,_`[��• I
-;:•, � I I-� I I `•_•' !.T
�L � � r`- I:
DrE ,I I ��
i I �U r, >�i
r : - rh A
�� I �
- - -- I - -''' �,:/•� ='�-
IMPE11A dl,ACH -L
`' •I
l _II
I I_o
o
T
rr fi
t� __ , - ----T�
rt
I
~— - `-?-�'--` f---- ^�--
1-
I ;,�._
-- r�`T
'1
-��Tr
1.
County of San Diego
Hydrology Manual
1
SP EGO q
, DI iC1G�
Rainfall Isopluvials
-
-�'
I_ : + ,
I , t_ T
-T
-
+T
J- `_ I .--'F � � j�
_y t''' -
i
-•- . ~!•1•' L-
I I r I!
- { � • • ! J?, +� '; _+ I
$
�
� -- � �_ •- J--1.�
�� I �I
-i..E H �I I -�
I-- - -;..• ki'� �.•I
�E� �I-
I_ I
I �_
I •• �•� I I I
�I +III
•,I I �, V I I I
� i j' : —iy I I I
•I I '1 �. ��`•. b, I`�I r_
I •, I I
•: LL� :'�' �;1�i•;I�
��� I. r
t. _
^ � ' ' �
�- 1�,__,
33030'- i
t` �_ � _�� -�
I��i� —_
_a
-; --
- 1 T� -_-_ti- 1 ,
1
--i • I �
- rt
�1� - -
�!••..i �_ %_III
i•.( 1- 1=
I � I I .,� I
_i! : 1
I
_ 33100
-
r�� - -•
I I I � I I
_• i I I
I I I I I L I I
' I I I I I i f I I- n
I I �' "i •T I
IT.'I ter
. I . I I I I�� �
III ' -
-I -I�i -
- 32 °45`
_ I_
I I I I I
_ - -_
- -'^�1
- -
I j +(•.4
•I��• L 11 r- }--••I T
T ^'.-_1 '•I
L.T Q;
YI Y j tl1 L.
IY T - ,- tom' -
I I i I I
- � • r.- I
0.
�� " '•.I' �I-4 I I '� I
�'. j'�G] _(_
tit .,_I
I_�r� : -
I .,� ,'� .••�_
_.. -I_,', ••;
I; sacoluNiv I;
f�_f •,
I ��Lf
_T t I :I •., •. �� I ')-
I I i __ -irt : �,
TI 11 1'•I I' I J ,•�S
�.i ; I_•:� •.•I .;�.
i ��'' I �I . _, L �'
I �' iTl l _
1 +- � I I I f�'KII
I' ii ig
- '- �- �--r -1
RIverslIJ6 Gount
I-. ..
— � —� I__�' t �� I TI`
—�,�� I.I
_ �1 .�.
• ,; : -�
_ r L ; i, L
I I i�
� �`100
��_ •i'';� L�;�i, ?� I I
�I
.... j , _ ....
I-( I�I IIII' :�
� j I
>�L -�" �__I
•�,I I ;� III
- —._�Lt _ _
I I_
1
�I ' I
��
I,, ; 'I I
(I
I e1 IIII :
I �- -. �; I. �
�_ I; I I: i -I i I• � �, �
I l t _.1 =g�1; , I �
'" I I. -'a � I•. •-I I I '' fi
1 � T I
�I I I I f l l l
_ _ I I I �
III i'i3
Year Rainfall Event - 6 Hours
- - - -- Isopluvial (inches)
;. i
_�` -'i_r.
r• I
- ,A �_j
C ' I
� l
'I �,i' l 'J_- _I,-- .�- -•-
I IL
j
��
It�j'�'
,
_ '''
-Nt
I�I
r
IQ
'� "ii
111
I ,..I
17-1
—�� '_'
—I . _
-
_
-
__
t-i •.�- --
� -i -
__
_
-I
!
_
I
.%
�i"
j III
1 � I t
I
I I I
_1_i
-1-
I�
IT,
-
-
_,�
o
��
__-
DPW
�GISGIS
F.> n .I, We Ha, yin Di,p (:mcrcd!
Tom, THIS MAP IS PROVIDED WITHOU WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHEREXPRESS
1V OR IMPLIED, INTRUDING. BUT NOT LIMITEOTO. THE IMPLIED WPRPFNTIR
OFMERC ANTAHILMANOFITNESS FOR A PARTILUWt PURPOSE.
DppWgM SanGIS. NI Ryhv Rm ed�
Tni. p�aunm m.r gym° I°m,��MU ft-ft SANDAG R°aaw
E Nw a� DAG,�ppN��,
Tnap�peunm. r�Mlnlmp�.n�.hluln.,e.N,nwmuw.m
S
3 0 3 Miles
__
- 32
1
°30'
—
_
_
-
e
r
--
•'
-1L
33° 411'N
3W TN
Hydrologic Soil Group —San Diego County Area, California e
2
R R
47 4]2300 4]Z310 4TI3N 4rLLia 4/L'40 4TLYA 4/2tU 4]Zi]0
3
Map SCle: 1: 672 f prnred on A land�pe (11" x 8.5 ") sMa.
R Metes
N
0 5 10 20 30
ree
0 30 6D 120 190
Map projn : Web Nl a CDnlel cordnat : WGS84 Edge b6: UrM Zt 11N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
!r /::J =YIAI-- r10 Ui1 /LfP�J /l .!1
I3 11'N
3r 4aN
4?29
3
h
R
5/16/2018
Page 1 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group —San Diego County Area, California
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (A01)
C
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
O
Soil Rating
Polygons
Q
A
O
AID
0
B
Q
BID
o
C
0
CID
O
D
Q
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Lines
,y
A
.•.
AID
y
B
�y
BID
r•�
C
y
CID
N
D
.e�
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Points
O
A
0
AID
0
B
0
BID
o
C
El
CID
O
D
0
Not rated or not available
Water Features
I
Streams and Canals
Transportation
t..ry
Rails
,y
Interstate Highways
,y
US Routes
_.v
Major Roads
d
Local Roads
Background
®
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
124,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal -area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA -NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: San Diego County Area, California
Survey Area Data: Version 12, Sep 13, 2017
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 3, 2014 —Nov
22, 2014
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5116/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group —San Diego County Area, California
' USDA
Hydrologic Soil Group
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive
precipitation from long- duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B /D, and C /D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively
drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water
transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well
drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.
These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of
water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay
layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious
material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B /D, or C /D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in
their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
5/16/2018
Page 3 of 4
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
MIC
Marina loamy coarse
sand, 2 to 9 percent
slopes
B
2.2
100.0%
Totals for Area of Interest
2.21
100.0%
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive
precipitation from long- duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B /D, and C /D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively
drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water
transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well
drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.
These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of
water transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay
layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious
material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B /D, or C /D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in
their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
5/16/2018
Page 3 of 4
' Hydrologic Soil Group —San Diego County Area, California
Component Percent Cutoff None Specified
' Tie -break Rule: Higher
I
' USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5116/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4
San Diego County Hydrology Manual Section: 3
Date: June 2003 Page: 6 of 26
Table 3 -1
RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR URBAN AREAS
Land Use Runoff Coefficient "C"
Soil Type
NRCS Elements County Elements % IMPER. A B C D
Undisturbed Natural Terrain (Natural)
Permanent Open Space
0*
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Residential, 1.0 DU /A or less
10
0.27
0.32
0.36
0.41
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Residential, 2.0 DU /A or less
20
0.34
0.38
0.42
0.46
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Residential, 2.9 DU /A or less
25
038
0.41
0.45
0.49
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Residential, 4.3 DU /A or less
30
0.41
0.45
0.48
0.52
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Residential, 7.3 DU /A or less
40
0.48
0.51
0.54
0.57
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Residential, 10.9 DU /A or less
45
0.52
0.54
0.57
0.60
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Residential, 14.5 DU /A or less
50
0.55
0.58
0.60
0.63
High Density Residential (HDR)
Residential, 24.0 DU /A or less
65
0.66
0.67
0.69
0.71
High Density Residential (HDR)
Residential, 43.0 DU /A or less
80
0.76
0.77
0.78
0.79
Commercial /Industrial (N. Com)
Neighborhood Commercial
80
0.76
0.77
0.78
0.79
Commercial /Industrial (G. Com)
General Commercial
85
0.80
0.80
0.81
0.82
Commercial /Industrial (O.P. Com)
Office Professional /Commercial
90
0.83
0.84
0.84
0.85
Commercial /Industrial (Limited L)
Limited Industrial
90
0.83
0.84
0.84
0.85
Commercial /Industrial (General 1.)
General Industrial
95
0.87
0.87
0.87
0.87
*The values associated with 0% impervious may be used for direct calculation of the runoff coefficient as described in Section 3.1.2 (representing the pervious runoff
coefficient, Cp, for the soil type), or for areas that will remain undisturbed in perpetuity. Justification must be given that the area will remain natural forever (e.g., the area
is located in Cleveland National Forest).
DU /A = dwelling units per acre
NRCS = National Resources Conservation Service
3 -6
San Diego County Hydrology Manual
Date: June 2003
Section: 3
Page: 12 of 26
Note that the Initial Time of Concentration should be reflective of the general land -use at the
upstream end of a drainage basin. A single lot with an area of two or less acres does not have
a significant effect where the drainage basin area is 20 to 600 acres.
Table 3 -2 provides limits of the length (Maximum Length (LM)) of sheet flow to be used in
hydrology studies. Initial T; values based on average C values for the Land Use Element are
also included. These values can be used in planning and design applications as described
below. Exceptions may be approved by the "Regulating Agency" when submitted with a
detailed study.
Table 3 -2
MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH (Lm)
& INITIAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION (Ta
Element*
DU/
Acre
.5%
1%
2%
3%
5%
10%
LM
T;
LM
T;
LM
T;
LM
Ti
LM
Ti
LM
T;
Natural
50
13.2
70
12.5
85
10.9
100
10.3
100
8.7
100
6.9
LDR
1
50
12.2
70
11.5
85
10.0
100
9.5
100
8.0
100
6.4
LDR
2
50
11.3
70
10.5
85
9.2
100
8.8
100
7.4
100
5.8
LDR
2.9
50
10.7
70
10.0
85
8.8
95
8.1
100
7.0
100
5.6
MDR
1 4.3
50
1 10.2
1 70
9.6
80
1 8.1
1 95
7.8
1 100
1 6.7
100
1 5.3
MDR
7.3
50
9.2
65
8.4
80
7.4
95
7.0
100
6.0
100
4.8
MDR
10.9
50
8.7
65
7.9
80
6.9
90
6.4
100
5.7
100
4.5
MDR
14.5
50
8.2
65
7.4
80
6.5
90
6.0
100
5.4
100
4.3
HDR
24
50
6.7
65
6.1
75
5.1
90
4.9
95
4.3
100
3.5
HDR
43
50
5.3
65
4.7
75
4.0
85
3.8
95
3.4
100
2.7
N. Com
50
5.3
60
4.5
75
4.0
85
3.8
95
3.4
100
2.7
G. Com
50
4.7
60
4.1
75
3.6
85
3.4
90
2.9
100
2.4
O.P. /Com
50
4.2
60
3.7
70
3.1
80
2.9
90
2.6
100
2.2
Limited I.
50
4.2
60
3.7
70
3.1
80
2.9
90
2.6
100
2.2
General 1.
50
3.7
60
3.2
70
2.7
80
2.6
90
2.3
100
1.9
*See Table 3 -1 for more detailed description
3 -12
142 1
11432 1
PRE -DEVEL OPMENT HYDROLOGIC NODE MAP
1112 EOLUSAVENUE
PFP°ERTYNI/pIM
RIGyfLF.MY
KW[EIYfMGPWIY
flAL
ENIS[WG NAFOHA /F 1A /11
1454 n
v
_
1589
PERCENT
MPERmous (A)
15699
g PPE '"
BR CK
165.6 1
f SD HEADWALL
BRICK
BRICK
o
�
1497 �
..
rn
NODE 1.1
154 7
GRAVEL 1552
A 1492
ELEV =163.6
61 ,
1
NODE 1.2
ELEV =142.4
751 1 .. �-
*53 6
0100= 1.54 CFS
�_ L 305'
164 a
16C
BASINA
"a
'AREA 29,991 SF /0.69AC
;
__ -- — __z
=50.47
0
C
W
1
I21M
3
TRELLIS i-
1588
Q
1
�
._
u`
-
n I
1656
V
1593
t
1465
AT'
e
A
1485
Y
2
a 1654
PFP°ERTYNI/pIM
RIGyfLF.MY
KW[EIYfMGPWIY
flAL
ENIS[WG NAFOHA /F 1A /11
- . -
152 3'C
_
1589
PERCENT
MPERmous (A)
15699
g PPE '"
WALL OBSCURED
165.6 1
f SD HEADWALL
0
o
�
1497 �
..
rn
—�
154 7
GRAVEL 1552
A 1492
LEGEND
PFP°ERTYNI/pIM
RIGyfLF.MY
KW[EIYfMGPWIY
flAL
ENIS[WG NAFOHA /F 1A /11
PEPVIOUS !PEI
Isq
IMP[RVIOV$
4 EA Rq
[.TAI AREA
AREA
Rq
PERCENT
MPERmous (A)
15699
419)
xeaxnwr
FMSMG llA'[IpMS IP%
ftONLYE ! /
W`x°'"SR PASCO LARET SUITOR
& ASSOCIATES
w ew. Enr ♦uo. v.a."m
pui nIawu nIWnpv.by
POS T -DEVEL OPMENT HYDROLOGIC NODE MAP
1112 EOLUSAVENUE
1-2 1 LL
-o
.45 a n o m
BR C<
NODE 1.1
BRICK BRICK ELEV =164.6
y D I
L =31T
7 °
— — — — —
x c
.. ... �x— x. —x —x
1 n
3m � BASI A
_ 91S
_ .14 CFS n r se
C =50.47
x a
r L'ELLIS
r _
- � c
1432 \ 144 5 _ 2 _ I COVERED
-AT lO 2
/ 7523
I
PIPER - '" - - WALCOBSCURED x ME-NER
Q SD I HEADWALL
. 1197 - 0
ELL
1492 154 7 GRAVEL 155.2
f - - �
LEGEND
PROPERTY�Y
RIOM1 MY
.1 affPfl0.°ERIY
PROPoSEO HAROSCAPE TABLE
vERVIOVS <REJ
ISF)
MVEflV10US
aRE](SF/
i0]/E JiEp
/SF)
PERCENT
NvERVIOUS (4/
10015
9,3J3
I9, 391
33
I
�a
&SWOgM3lNY
✓�
EAISTWGC s 'tv
PFOPoSEACQVIDWS E1�
/
PASCO LARET SUITER
8 ASSOCIATES
W I rn■amuw. wm rwwuo. uxo awm�o
u+..0 mpn En r �. Ys. rEs u mn
M nuwnu I aws■.E�n I p..p.rnE{�
win
p
r�
1656
it
I
i
1656
1
PASCO LARET SUITER
8 ASSOCIATES
W I rn■amuw. wm rwwuo. uxo awm�o
u+..0 mpn En r �. Ys. rEs u mn
M nuwnu I aws■.E�n I p..p.rnE{�