The URL can be used to link to this page

2000-6538 GENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects city of District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering May 14, 2003 Attn: American Motorists Insurance Company C/o Lou Jones & Associates PO Box 41375 7470 N. Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90041 RE: Encinitas Ranch Apartments, LLC Via Cantebria @ Garden View Road Grading Permit 6538 -G Case 98 -295 MUP/DR/CDP APN 257- 040-46 Final release of security Permit 6538 -G authorized earthwork, storm drainage, and erosion control, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the grading all as shown on approved plan and has been finaled. Therefore, the final release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 3SM 986 068 00, in the remainder amount of $112,504.25, can hereby be released in entirety. The document original is hereby enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer 646 Ja Lembach Finance Manager Financial Services Cc: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Encinitas Ridge Apartments, LLC Debra Geishart file enc. TEL 760- 633 -2600 / FAX 760-633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 0 recycled paper ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT city O� Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering May 14, 2003 Attn: American Motorists Insurance Company C/o Lou Jones & Associates PO Box 41375 7470 N. Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90041 RE: Encinitas Ranch Apartments, LLC Via Cantebri a @ Garden View Road Permanent Encroachment Permit 6538 -PE Case 98 -295 MUP/DR/CDP APN 257- 040-46 Final release of security Permit 6538 -PE authorized the installation of site storm drainage, site retaining walls, trench repair, and erosion control, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the work as shown on approved plan. Therefore, the final release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 3SM 986 069 00, in the amount of $2,412.00, can hereby be released in entirety. The document original is hereby enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Si ncerely, afd— 4 � �-' W Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Cc: lay Lembach, Finance Manager Encinitas Ridge Apartments, LLC Debra Geishart file enc. Jay Lembach Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 760633 -2600 / FAX 760 - 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinim. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760- 633 -2700 0 mcyded paper ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City Of Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations February 6, 2002 Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering Attn: American Motorists Insurance Company C/o Lou Jones & Associates PO Box 41375 7470 N. Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90041 RE: Encinitas Ranch Apartments, LLC Via Cantebria @ Garden View Road 6538 -G Case 98 -295 MUP/DR/CDP APN 257 - 04046 Partial release of security Permit 6538 -G authorized earthwork, storm drainage, and erosion control, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the rough grading with improvements still pending. Therefore, a partial release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 3SM 986 068 00, in the amount of $360,013.60, can hereby be reduced to $112,504.25. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, - n AA /V 1 0"-L Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer L lie Suelter Financial Services Manager Financial Services Cc: Leslie Suelter, Financial Manager Encinitas Ridge Apartments, LLC file enc. TEL -6rt633- 2610 FAX -(0- 633 -262- 504 5. Vulcan .Avenue. Encinitas. Califomia 9 202 4 -363 3 TDD 7(,"33 -2700 4 recycled paper E GINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City 0 Encinitas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering February 6, 2002 Attn: City National Bank International Dept. 606 South Olive Street, Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90014 RE: Encinitas Ranch Apartments, LLC Via Cantebria @ Garden View Road 6538 -G Case 98 -295 MUP/DR/CDP APN 257- 040 -46 Final release of security Permit 6538 -GI authorized earthwork, storm drainage, site retaining wall, and erosion control, all as necessary to build the described project. Inspection department has approved this work. Therefore, a full release of the security deposited is merited. Letter of Credit 001206.OD.1400, in the amount of $90,003.40, is hereby released in its entirety. The document original is enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, A'v0L--- Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Field Operations CC: Leslie Sucher, Financial Manager Encintas Ranch Apartments, LLC File 4 t Leslie Suelter Financial Services Manager Financial Services TF.L'( *33 ?fxNl PkS 161).61 3-262- iui S. Vulcan .4,cnue. Encinitas. California 9202 + -3633 TIM -,6)-()33-27 00 ✓ recycledpaper 4MOTYNATIONATBANK [XJCITY NATIONAL BANK INTERNATIONAL DEPT. 606 SOUTH OLIVE STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 SWIFT ADDRESS:CINAUS6L TEL No.(213) 347 -2300 FAX No.(213) 347 -2327 ISSUE DATE: 12/06/2000 ( )CITY NATIONAL BANK INTERNATIONAL DEPT. STE 300 351 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 TLX No. 825717 TLX No. 6771223 TEL No. (415) 576 -2700 FAX No. (415) 362 -4549 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 001206.OD.1400 BENEFICIARY: CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. VULCAN ENCINITAS, CA 92024 APPLICANT: ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC 10679 WESTVIEW PARKWAY SAN DIEGO, CA 92126 AMOUNT: USD 90,003.40 NINETY THOUSAND THREE 40/100 U.S. DOLLARS EXPIRY DATE AND PLACE: 12/01/2001 ISSUING BANK, INTL DEPT. GENTLEMEN: COP WE HEREBY ESTABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IN YOUR FAVOR AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT BY YOUR DRAFT(S) AT SIGHT DRAWN ON CITY NATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND ACCOMPANIED BY DOCUMENTS AS SPECIFIED BELOW: 1. THIS ORIGINAL STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT, AND AMENDMENT(S), IF ANY. 2. BENEFICIARY'S SIGNED AND DATED STATEMENT WORDED AS FOLLOWS: "I, (NAME OF SIGNER), AN AUTHORIZED SIGNER OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, CERTIFY THAT ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE PERMIT NO. 6538 -6 ISSUED BY THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF GARDEN VIEW AND VIA CANTEBRIA, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA." EACH DRAFT MUST STATE "DRAWN UNDER CREDIT NO. 001206.OD.1400 OF CITY NATIONAL BANK, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA." WE HEREBY ENGAGE WITH YOU THAT ALL DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS CREDIT SHALL BE DULY HONORED IF PRESENTED FOR PAYMENT AT THE OFFICE OF CITY NATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, 606 SOUTH OLIVE STREET, SUITE 300, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90014 ON OR BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS CREDIT. EXCEPT SO FAR AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY STATED, THIS CREDIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDBY PRACTICES 1998 ( "ISP98 "), INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION NO. 590. AUTH�O ZK�D IGS NATURE TO MAN UEN VICE PRESIDENT AUTH(� IZED ST NATURE CHA YUK WAH WONG ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT ORIGINAL YCITYNATIONAL BANK [X)CITY NATIONAL BANK INTERNATIONAL DEPT, 606 SOUTH OLIVE STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 SWIFT ADURESS:CINAUS6L TEL No.(213) 347 -2300 FAX No. ( ^t3) 347 -2327 ISSUE DATE: 12/06/2000 [ )CITY NATIONAL HANK INTERNATIONAL DEPT. STE 300 351 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 TLX No. 825717 TLX No. 6771223 TEL No. (415) 576 -2700 FAX No. (415) 362 -4549 E IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 001206.OD.1400 BENEFICIARY: CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. VULCAN ENCINITAS, CA 92024 APPLICANT: ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC 10679 WESTVIEW PARKWAY SAN DIEGO, CA 92126 AMOUNT: USD 90,003.40 NINETY THOUSAND THREE 40/100 U.S. DOLLARS EXPIRY DATE AND PLACE: 12/01/2001 ISSUING BANK, INTL DEPT. GENTLEMEN: WE HEREBY ESTABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IN YOUR FAVOR AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT BY YOUR DRAFT(S) AT SIGHT DRAWN ON CITY NATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND ACCOMPANIED BY DOCUMENTS AS SPECIFIED BELOW: 1. THIS ORIGINAL STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT, AND AMENDMENT(S), IF ANY. 1 2. BENEFICIAARY'S SIGNED AND DATED STATEMENT WORDED AS FOLLOWS: "I, (NAME OF SIGNER), AN AUTHORIZED SIGNER OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, CEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, CERTIFY THAT ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE PERMIT NO. 6538-6 ISSUED BY THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF GARDEN VIEW AND VIA CANTEBRIA, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA." EACH DRAFT MUST STATE "DRAWN UNDER CREDIT NO. 001206.OD.1400 OF CITY NATIONAL BANK, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA." WE HEREBY ENSAGE WITH YOU THAT ALL DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS CREDIT SHALL BE DULY HONORED IF PRESENTED FOR PAYMENT AT THE OFFICE OF CITY NATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, 606 SOUTH OLIVE STREET, SUITE 300, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90014 ON OR BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS CREDIT. EXCEPT SO FAR AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY STATED, THIS CREDIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDBY PRACTICES 1998 ( "ISP98 "), INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION NO. 590. 1 AUTHO SIGNATURE TO MAN DEN VICE PRESIDENT W AUT IZED S NATURE C YUK WAH WONG ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT Quue m m N m m wa w¢ uu r V 0 Q X CE X dw r mw ° J � W r= ut � J LL W 00 F 4 Qa z� Q N 0 Ow r f- r Q U° t_ to 0 W ° W N p1 Q J W 30 ro w 2 rc — ua �o R a 61eCnY NATIONAL 13ANV INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS G"raT�R 606 South Olive Street, Suite 300 Date 11/30/00 CABLE ADDRESS "CINABANK LSA" Los Angeles, California 90014 TELEX 825717 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT APPLICATION AND LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT J TO: CITY NATIONAL BANK (CNB) ❑ Cable We (Applicant) request you to establish by ❑ Overnight courier service an irrevocable standby Letter of Credit on ❑ Same day messenger service the following terms and conditions: ADVISING BANK I (name and address) BENEFICIARY tname and address) CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. VULCAN ENCINTi`TAS, CA 92024 available by Draft(s) at sight on CNB and accompanied by the following: APPLICANT (name and address) 10679 WESTVIEW PARKWAY SAN DIEGO, CA 92126 AMOUNT (indicate currency —i.e., U.S. a —and specify amount in figures and words S 9 n, n n 3- 4 NINETY THOUSAND THREE DOLLARS AND 40 CENTS EXPIRY DATE 1211/01 AT CNS's ISSUING OFFICE "I AN AUTHORIZED SIGNER OF THE CITY OF (Name of Signer) ENCINITAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, CERTIFY THAT ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE PERMIT NO. ENCINITAS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF GARDEN VIEW AND VIA CANTEBRIA, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA. LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT In consideration of your opening, at our request, a letter of Credit (herein called "the Credit "), the terms and conditions of which appear on the reverse side hereof we hereby agree as follows: 1. As to drafts under or purporting to be under the Credit, which are payable in lawful United States funds, we agree to pay you on demand at your issuing office in lawful United States funds, the amount of such draft(s) on the presentment to you thereof or, at your request in advance. 2. As to drafts under or purporting to be under the Credit, which are payable in foreign currency, we agree to pay you at your office on demand, the equivalent of each such draft in lawful United States funds at your then prevailing rate of exchange effective for sales of that other currency for cable transfer to the country of which it is the currency. 3. We also agree to pay to you any attorneys' fees incurred in the enforcement of this Letter of Credit Agreement, your service charge in accordance with your Schedule of Fees and Charges now existing or as hereafter adopted, and all other charges and expenses paid or incurred by you in connection therewith. 4. We agree to reimburse you for any losses and charges incurred by you or made against you in connection with this Agreement and related to the reevaluation or fluctuations in the exchange rate of any currency whether United States or any other. 5. We hereby convey and transfer to you a security interest in all goods, documents and instruments which shall come into your American Motor' Insurance Comp; y ICemPee. FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULLY EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 986 069 00 Premium (Two Years) : $100.00 —- SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Encinitas Ranch Apartments. LLC, as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Two Thousand Four Hundred Twelve & 00 /100ths DOLLARS ($2,412.00), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a contract/agreement, dated _, with the Obligee to do and perform the following work; to wit: Permanent Encroachment - Poinsettia Ridee Apartments NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALE , DA D: vember 30, 2000 nci ch Apartments, LLC American Motorists Insurance Company (Princi al) J �, / (Surety) By' BY ti 1llVY KeMa D. Conrad, Attorney In Fact DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: In LOU JONES & ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -6291 . FAX (323) 256 -7218 auuumsron rcrNfmance Dona - v5-z>yY aot CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California l County of QLL3') Lit e �: } ss. On 1Z i L before me, j Dale 1 l / Name and title Micar (e 9 .'Jane personally appeared �r,l! L2' rsonally known to me proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(a) whose names) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /sljekhe"xecuted the same in his /hgrltheiv authorized capacity(igs;, and that by his /herfthdc_ N RLV M. JONES signature(a)-on the instrument the person(4t or Mfl.E 7 jon4112837( the entity upon behalf of which the person(gi E)MY N .� —Cow acted, executed the instrument. cv v,� county colrnt. E©iee MW 5.21111 WITNESS my hand and official seal. Place Naar, Seal AWve r. of Notary I Ic OPTIONAL Though the Information below is not required by law it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date. Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ' • Corporate Officer — Title(s): icp of thumb here • Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: ® 1997 National Nalary A Aoaation • 9350 De Solo Ave, P 0. Bare 2402 • Chalsworth, CA 91313 -2402 PmC N. 5907 ReoMer Call Tall-Free 1 -60o 6764i627 CALIFORNIA ALL -PURPk State of California County of Los Angeles On C�IOV Z C 2()(jL ACKNOWLEDGMENT C. Clarkson personally appeared KeAna D. Conrad NAME OF SIGNER ®Personally known to me - OR -❑ I�I�n�OIr�xAe \f.t�l,�I.0 "y P- �•IV.:.:♦ ..y.. F Notary Public TITLE OF OFFICER proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. A,l�il i' (SYGNATURE OF NOTARY) OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES NCv 3 0 = DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) ..... ....._._._... .................... American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company SIGNER OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company .-Lou Jones & Associates TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES NCv 3 0 = DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) ..... ....._._._... .................... American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company SIGNER OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company .-Lou Jones & Associates IVe ipe Z. Home Office: Long Grove. IL W049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Krow All Men By These Presents: That the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, the American Motorists Insurance Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutua- Insurance Company, corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of Ilinols, having their principal office in Long Grove Illinois, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the 'Company') do hereby appoint KBAna C. Conrad of Los Angeles, California" " " " " " " " " "' their true and lawful agent(s) and attomey(s)-4n• fact. to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the date of Issuance of this power and ending on the date specified below, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as their act and deed: Any and all bonds and undertakings provided the amount of no one bond or undertaking exceeds ONE MILLION DOLLARS EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY Is granted to make, execute. seal trod deliver any bad or undertakkg which guarantees the payment or collection of any promissory note. check, draft or letter of credit This audlalty does not permit the same obligation to be split Into two or more bonds In order to bring each such bad within the dollar limit of authority as set forth heroin. . This appointment may be revoked at any time by the Company. The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as boding upon the said Company as fully and amply to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duty executed and advlowiedged by their regutsriy elected officers at their principal office in Long Grove, Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF December 31, 2001 This Power of Attomey Is executed by authority of resolutions adopted by fine 6mwttve Corrsrttftw of the Boards of Directors of the Company on February 23, 1988 at Chicago, IUlnots, true and accurate copies of which are hereinafter set forth and are hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being In fuU farce and effect NOTED. That the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President, or their appointees designated In wrlUng and filed with the Secretary, or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attomeys -in -fad, and to autllatze them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings, recogntzances, contracts of Indemnity and other writings, obligatory In the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of procass.' This Power of Attorney is signed, sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Boards of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1488: NOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President arry Moe President, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certifications by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted try the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified v,1th respect to any bard or undertaking to which It Is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company' In Testimony Whereof, the Company has caused this Instrument to be signed and their corporate seals to be affixed by their authorized officers, this July 7. 2000. Attested and Certified: r��w C.y ewW Cr i fti r,r• 1'h, 0� Robert P. Hames, Secretary by Lumbermen Mutual Casualty Company American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company W Cy/ -- z v r "y ---, = J. S. Kemper, III, Exec.Vice President America I N o o nsurance Comp; y K2mPeR. FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULLY EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 986 068 00 Premium (Two Years) : $5,400.00 SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Encinitas Ranch Apartments. LLC as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, ;n the sum of Three Hundred Sixtv Thousand Thirteen & 60 /100ths DOLLARS ($360,013.60), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a contract/agreement, dated 00/00/00, with the Obligee to do and perform the following work; to wit: Grading - Poinsettia Ridge Apartments NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALED, DATED: November 30, 2000 nc ch Apartments, LLC (Principal) By American Motorists Insurance Company I (Surety) By: / , KeAna D. Conrad, Anomey In Fact DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: In LOU JONES & ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 • FAX (323) 256 -7218 Jubuivislon reriormance Mona - U6 -19-99. dot CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California �County of 1.�� J ss. On . 1 j before me, Date 1f 1/ Namtte personally appeared �'r� _ • hi T IflT�RtY M..1pNQ tI48171 =� a cf� carry EMy C&M. En*w Mn S. 2Mt I❑ Zrsonally known to me / proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(g) whose name(Qj is/ace- subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /sWe-Ahey.executed the same in his /hoWtk44 authorized capacity(ie�D, and that by his /heli: F it signature(e) on the instrument the person(@), or the entity upon behalf of which the persor a acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Place Notary Seal Above SigNaall al Nnlary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law. it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Dale: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer's Name: ❑ Individual Signer • Corporate Officer — Title(s): _ • Partner —:J Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact • Trustee • Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER w 1991 Nalronal Notary Association • 9050 De Soto Ave.. PO Boa 2402 • Chal~h. CA 91717 -2402 Prod. No 5907 Reorder: Call Toll F. 1- 800.816 -6821 s CALIFORNIA ALL- PURPC# _ ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Los Angeles On NUV 3 p 20 C. Clarkson Notary Public NAME TITLE OF OFFICER Personally appeared KeAna D. Conrad NAME OF SIGNER ®Personally known to me - OR -❑ �.i r. Y S proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SI ATURE OF NOTARY) OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) F—] LIMITED 0 GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR F OTHER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company Lumbermen Mutual Casualty Company _Lou Jones & Associates DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE Chu PLC z. Home Office: Long Grove. IL 90049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Men By These Presents: That the Lumbermens Murual Casualty Company, the American Motorists Insurance Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutua. Insurance Company, corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of Ilinols, having their principal office in Long Grove. Illinois, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the *Company') do hereby appoint KeAna D. Conrad of Los Angeles, California-- their true and lawful agents) and attomey(s}in• fact, to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the date of issuance of this power and ending on the data specified below, unless sooner revoked for and on its behaH as surety, and as their ad and deed: Any and all bonds and undertakings provided the amount of no one bond or undertaking exceeds ONE MILLION DOLLARS 51.000,000.00 • »•- •^• » ^• » «.«« «.»........... EXCEPTION: NO AIITHMrTY Is (panted to make. execute, seal and delver arty bond or underiakkg whkh guarantees the payment or - mttectlon of any promLsaory rote. check, draft or letter of C MM This authority does not permit the same obagation to be split Into two or more bonds In order to bring each such bond within the dollar 14nit of authority as set forth herein. This appointment may be revoked at any time by the Company. The execution of such bonds and undertakings In pursuance of these presents shall be as binding upon the said Company as fully and amply to all intents and purposes, as If the same had been duty executed and acknowledged by their regularly, elected officers at their principal office in Long Grove, Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WrTHOLIT NOTICE AS OF December 31, 2001 This Power of Attorney Is executed by authority of resolutions adopted by Me Executive ComNttees of the Boards of Directors of the Company on February 23, 1988 at Chicago, Illinois, true and accurate copies of which are hereinafter set forth and are hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being In full force and effect NOTED. That the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President, or their appointees designated N writing and filed with the Secretary, or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attorneys -in -fact, and 10 authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and underlaklrgs, r000gNzances, contracts of lidemnity and other writings, obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process., This Power of Attorney Is signed, seated and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Boards of Directors of the Company at a meeting duty called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: 'VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the board, the President, any Vice President, or their appointees designated In writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certifications by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney or bond exerted pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which It is attached, shall continue to be valld and binding upon the Company.' In Testimony Whereof, the Company has caused this instrument to be signed and their corporate seals to be affixed by their authorized officers, this July 7, 2000. Attested and Certified: Lumbermen Mutual Casualty Company American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company cmruw r. M." I Me TAU' SEAL V6 . fre" arm Robert P. Hames, Secretary by J. S. Kemper, III, Exec.Vlce President Q�V CITY OF ENCINITAS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SECURITY OBLIGATION AGREEMENT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /we Encinitas Ranch Apartments, L.L.C., Principal, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Encinitas, a municipal corporation, in the County of San Diego, State of California, in 0� the sum of four hundred fifty-two thousa four h ed twent -nine s oC ($ 452,429.00 ) in the form of ond/ ash/ oc /c /assi n on deposit with the City Finance Officer Recei ) and to be held by it until this obligation becomes void a 'f any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by the City of Encinitas to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provisions recited hereinafter. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known as Poinsettia Ridge Apts, in accordance with En ineerin Permit No. 6538GI PE dated Ol y�O 1_ - - -- -- — and is required by the City Code to give a security to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall be conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Engineering Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the ordinances and standards of the City of Encinitas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this day of i : 4_9 -D C0l . Prin al &<rr S live r �" iness A Busddress x.I-) fib, CG;- r.4 ' -) I^I BO /03 /PW1 -21Wp5 8 (01/18/93 -11) CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California 1 8 /�l iC, \ County of y ss. J r, i On 1 U ' 1�1 ' �C , before me,t� Dale 1 �.N,a1me and Tile of ORlwr (e g..'Jara Doe, personally appeared NI I Y. M. JONES San C'� County — My Ca Expres My 5, 2D1 personally known to me proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(,Z whose name(- is /are, subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /s64bey executed the same in his /Of /tbeip authorized capacity(ie§)- and that by his /hedU:i@i signature(* -on the instrument the person(sy, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(kj acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS myhand and official seal. �Jlu, uq_ CA Place Notary Seal Above S'9 ne of Notary P bbc OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of A"achc Title or Type ocument Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above It Number of -�_L' If i.' Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): Top of thumb here ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: V tear Nalronm Noary Assooalion . 9350 0e Solo Ave_ PO Bos 2402 - Cnatsw . CA 91313 -2402 Prod. No. 5907 Reader Call roll Flee 1 800.87M827 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVE. —Y ENCINITAS, CA 92024 IMPROVEMENT PERMIT PARCEL NO. : 257- 040 -4600 JOB SITE ADDRESS: 700BLK VIA CANTEBRIA APPLICANT NAME ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 9823 PACIFIC HEIGHTS BLVD #J CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: PERMIT NO.: 6538I PLAN NO.: 6538 -I PHONE NO.: 858- 457 -435C 92121- CONTRACTOR : CORNERSTONE COMMIUNITIES CORPORATION PHONE NO.: 619 - 458 -9700 LICENSE NO.: 697803 LICENSE TYPE: B INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: LEGION INDEMNITY COMPANY POLICY NO. : GL21509355 POLICY EXP. DATE: 10/15/01 ENGINEER : SAFINO- BUTCHER- ORMONDE INC. E N0. 858- 560 -1141 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 4/25/01 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 10/15/01 PERMIT ISSUED BY INSPECTOR: RONALD QUIGG --- ------ --- -- ----- - - - - -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS ---------------------- - - - - -- 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 2. INSPECTION FEE 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: 4,600.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 3,240.00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 64,805.00 .00 DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------------- - - - - -- EARTHWORK /CURB & GUTTER & SIDEWALK /PCC CROSS GUTTER/ FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. PCC CURB & GUTTER REMOVAL 170LF/ 6" TYPE G 140LF/ 2 PED RAMPS/ PCC CROSS GUTTER 935SF/ TRENCH RESURFACING 200LF/ STRIPING REMOVAL & INSTALLATION 8030LF/ ARROWS 7EA/ SIGNS 3EA/ TELEPHONE PED 2EA/ IRR SYSTEM 2575SF/ 90 DAY MAINTENANCE 1LS. TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIRED. 60r,s -rA-,T Lcw O ej2 sc- r� - I yQ y owl ?u+! + c- , u P2oje --G-sr s . - - -- INSPECTION ----------- - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION AS- BUILTS AND ONE YEAR WARRANTY RETENTION REQUIRED. I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. URE 1 '^ r K- P Chi of'� PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: WN AGE . 3. N lu, 16 ) DATE SIGNED L�r'd 4cy �po '< 12-0 TELEPHONE NUMBER CITY OF ENCINITAS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SECURITY OBLIGATION AGREEMENT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /we G, r-r "Fr- f�)VP —G4 �FPA rCN LLr-, Principal, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Encinitas, a municipal corporation, in the County of San Diego, State of California, in the sum of , �rr �tiv� �Fty�SLj� C--16t -f kjvtiD269 F)vE ($ 64, 50C ) in the form of p..,c/-,,D on deposit with the City Finance Officer (per Receipt # ) and to be held by it until this obligation becomes void and if any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by the City of Encinitas to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provisions recited hereinafter. �6 o 4 ZSW 98"1 '1+5 Oo The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known as (ZiL66AP9(C�,,in accordance with Engineering Permit No. _��$______ dated `�I c o I , and is required by the City Code to give a sec rity to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall be conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Engineering Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the ordinances and standards of the City of Encinitas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the,said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this 26 n day of Ap << -1 I , lye' 2a0 ). incipal 93 c r eL, r,A-/0vt- a2 Business Address <p-N 01 t1ti q,, `\ BO /03 /PW1 -21wp5 8 (01/18/93 -11) American Motorits Insurance CompOty IQemPeR. FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULL Y EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 987 715 00 Premium (Two Years) : $972.00 SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Encinitas Ranch Apartments LLC, as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Sixty Four Thousand Eight Hundred Five and No /100ths DOLLARS (564,805.00), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a contract/agreement, dated 2001, with the Obligee to do and perform the following work; to wit: Pointsettia Ridge Apartments NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALED, DATED: March 16, 2001 Encinitas Ranch Apartments, LLC American Motorists Insurance Company r (Principal) I �( (Sureh�) By. 1 By fi T KeAna D. Conrad, Attorney In Fact Ure R. Kretowicz, Manager DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: In LOU JONES & ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 • FAX (323) 256 -7218 ww�. ��o�� , a ivunaucc wuu - uo- t�•ry.uu� C,A'OItNIA State of California County of Los Angeles On .4,!;. 1 6 :' 1fJ` C. Clarkson Notary Public NAME TITLE OF OFFICER personally appeared KeAna D. Conrad NAME OF SIGNER ®Personally known to me - OR -❑ w•OYiieinen4eei•ein•ii•iin • MIYBOFI ObUi C. CLARKSGN i Y nit C(p,IM. #' c y ,, �> NOrnRY R'J[tltC- ChilrO!,NU. R .° LOS ANGELES CCUNiY •ii Illy Corm Exoirx Sent 5, 2001 _q ^ni•ei BOiigiJiY proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS y han and official seal. ^ (SIGNATURE OF NOTARY) OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER DESCRIMON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES woi6LW DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company SIGNER OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE Lumbermen Mutual Casualty Company Lou Jones & Associates Vol we z. Homy Office: Long Grove, IL 60049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Men By These Presents: Thal the Lumbermans Mun,Jl Casualty Company, the American Motorists Insurance Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutua' Insurance Company, cofporauons organized and exisung under the laws of the State of Illnols, having their principal office in Long Grove Illinois, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the 'Company) do hereby appoint KeAna D. Conrad of Los Angeles, Califomia'•'••'••'•••'•'•'••'• their true and lawful agent(s) and attomey(s4n-facl, to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the date of issuance of this power and ending on the date specified below, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as their act and deed: Any and all bonds and undertakings provided the amount of no one bond or undertaking exceeds ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000, 000. 00)----»..••••.....---- »..• «..... »'..........• «...•••• EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY b granted to make, execute, seal and delver any bond or urdsrWdng which 0ecdcn of arty promissory rots. chedt, draft or letter of mdt- �' i0sai a7° payment cur, co . This authority does not permit the same obligation to be split Into two or more bands In order to bring each such bond within the dollar mit of authority as set forth heneln. . This appointment may be revoked at any time by the Company. "I'll. - ' - The execution or such bonds and undertakings In pursuance of these presents shall be as binding upon the Said Company as fully and amply to all intents and purposes, as if Me same had been duty executed and acknowledged by their regularly elected officers at their principal office in Long Grove, Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WTR1O(JT NOTICE AS OF December 31, 2001 This Power of Attorney Is executed by authority of resolutions adopted by the Executive Cornmi t es of the Boards of DlreUOrs of the Company on February 23, 1988 at Chkago. Mnols, true and accurate copies of which are hereinafter set forth and are hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being In fiaa force and effect: 'VOTED. That the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President, or Moir appointees designated In writing and Ned with the Secretary. or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and atomays.Lrfact, and to auMortra them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto. bonds and undertakings, recogrizances. contracts or i denrhlty and other writings, obligatory In the nature thereof, and any such often of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process.* This Power of Atomey b signed, sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive Conunittee of the Boards of Directors of the Company at a meeting duy called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: 'VOTED. That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice President, or their appointees designated In writing and Ned with the Secretary. and the signature of the Secretary. the seal of the Company. and oerdllcalkxhs by the Secretary, may be afxed by facelnJle on any power or attorney or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive CortrNitee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and cartfed with respecs to any bard or undertaking to which It IS attached. shat continue to be valid and binding upon the Company.' In Tmtimony Whereof, the Company has caused this Instrument to be signed and their corporate seals to be affluted by their authartzed officers, this July 7, 2000. Attested and Certified: Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Company American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company eee I, Robert P. Hamae, Secretary by J. S. Kemper, 111, Exec.Vice President CALIFORNIA ALL -PU' SE ACKNOWLEDGMENT cN�rsr.. rYr<=: r..- r. .c"�..= C.c- rb�r�•�•�.�•�.n�.v- �.o- c -£a•.— — — — — — Fpersonally County before me, Date Name arM im of Oe¢er ( .'Jane Doe. NotaryPubIK ) d LP N s) $Ignegs) n to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the bass of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by 6M-A<A 3:ASE his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), Via, y Cornm:s'a = 1145508 or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, Norory P,--;c - Cafforni0 � Son 0:eyc County - executed the instrument. My Cgn-m. �coie5 JN 3, 2001 WITNESS my hand and official seal. $pnawra of Notary Ppdk OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer i Title(s): Partner — n Limited Attorney -in -Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: General RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer i Title(s): Partner — E Limited ❑ General Attorney -in -Fact Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Other: Signer Is Representing: 0 1995 Nalional Notary Asl lron • 9236 Remmal Avg O. Boa 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91309.7184 Prod. No 5907 Reoroel Call Tok Free 1- BOX- 6]66627 JUL -23 -01 15 =21 FROM =CORNERSTONE COMMUNITIES 10=6564523600 PAGE 1/3 IWCnYNATIONAL BANK ►J��Q �� REAL ESTATE GROUP -SAN DIEGO T �� 4275 EXECUTIVE SQUARE, SUITE 750 b6 LA JOLLA, CA 92097 PAX (9 58) 642 -4965 TO 95ON FROM: LUCY FLARES COMPANY: CORNERSTONE COMMUNI'TIBS DAT& JULY 19, 2001 v FAX NUMBER: 856 452-560(0 V� 3 f Z2` TO'PAL rro. OF FACT & S RE: CITY OR ENCINITAS Cr_ kXUYOBNT O+OR"VIEW 09LEASECOMMENT 13PLEASHREPLY OPL$AURSC'YCLS NOTES /COM)A3N & req=g Qq of e. •. ' 6m Gq acknowkdgera"t • . a.. va US Nta Orgmal Lew benig famwded to you v2a US Mafl w •r. Your help is grm* apprrmtn . rpage ns f Qa14ST-A7v0 X119 S 2"d 5964LV9B 5e 09 aaua 5LL4 YN" 7VNO(1vM A.L!n C9:01 (aml) 10. 61 "Inf JUL -23 -01 15:21 FROM:CORNERSTONE COMMUNITIES ID:8584523600 n' CITY NATIONAL BANK REAL EwxTE GROuPSAN DWG 4275 n3WCUIIVE SQUARE, SURE 760 LA JoLLA, CAI-iFORm1A 02037 eS"42.4D72 FAX 858-642 -4965 Ltm FLOM= ltLORFS�RYrtlL.caM ADM118ZT" W 5Fenuwrr. W July 18, 2001 ?&. Jack Robson Camastoec Communities Corporation 4365 Executive Drive, Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92121 Re: Encinitas Ranch Apartments/City of Encinitae/Certificates of Deposit Dear Jack, PAGE 2/3 The Certificates of Deposit opened June 16, 2000 as account #027365736 in the amount $751,500.00 and #027365744 in the amount of $30,544.59, matured on June 16, 2001. Both of the Certificates are principal payable to the City of Encinitas. At maturity, both Certiacates were rolled into new Certificates (principal payable to the City of Encinitas) as follows: #027365736 rolled into #027370721 in the principal amount of $752,200.52. #027365744 rolled into 4027370749 in the principal amount of $32 ,544.50. The new Certificates of Deposit were opened for 32 days and will automatically renew every 32 days. The first maturity data will be July 28, 2001. Changes to the Certificate of Deposits require the acknowledgement of the City. Plane have the City of Encinitas sign the acknowledgement portion of this letter and Fax to my attention. Please forward the original signature to this office. A self addressed stamped envelope is enclosed for your convenience. Theak you for your help in this matter. if 1 can answer any questions, please contact me. S' Lucy Flores ur,e. Fnc JUL -23 -01 IS =22 FROM:CORNERSTONE COMMUNITIES I13:8584523E00 PACE 3/3 July I8, 2001 Page 2 Acknowledgement of changes to CattMeate of Deposit 9027365744 and #027365736 described above, on deposit at City National Bank. Sekt 6y'. SMR ISD STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS; 619 294 6600; PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: May -1 -01 2:20PM; Page 3/3 `19- 2a<- 1. Provide construction details for each section of retaining wall designed. The constt'uation details shall be cross referenced to plans for each retaining wall. 2. Please incorporate the drainage details shown in soils report in the construction details. 3. Please insure all calculation requirements are incorporated in the construction details. SerrJt ,5y: SMR ISU STRUCTURAL ENGINEEpS; 619 294 6800; May -1 -01 2:20PM; Page 2/3 "M SW Structural Engineers, Inc. May 1, 2001 Tamara O'Neill VIA FAX: 760-633 -2818 City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 Re: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Dear Tamara: Attached please find my plan review Comments for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, Mehdi Rdshti, S.E. 3569 Fifth Avenuc. Suite 100 - San Diego, CA 92103 - Tel: (r,19)294-6600 - r= (619) 294 -6800 adminCPsmr- cng.cum ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PROJECT NAME: POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS JOB NO: 56122.20 S B & O, INC. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 560.1141 (858) 560 -8157 FAX 1001 NO. OF LOTS: 1 W.O.: EST, BY: DJO DATE: 05- Jan -01 CKD. BY. DATE: 05- Jan -01 POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS - CITY OF ENCINITAS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE (PRELIMINARY) DWG. NO ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT COST AMOUNT BOND PRICE BOND AMOUNT 1 PCC CURB & GUTTER REMOVAL 170 170 LF $3.00 $510 2 6" TYPE "G" CURB & GUTTER 140 140 LF $13.75 $1,925 3 PCC SIDEWALK 4,500 4,500 SF $4.00 $18,000 4 PEDESTRIAN RAMPS 2 2 EA $1,050.00 $2,100 5 PCC CROSS GUTTER 935 935 SF $625 $5,844- 6 8" SEWER LATERAL 60 60 LF LCWD ESTIMATE 7 TRENCH RESURFACING 200 200 LF $23.00 $4,600 8 STRIPING REMOVAL 4,275 4,275 LF $200 $8,550 9 2 WAY TURN STRIPING - DETAIL 31 2,825 2,825 LF $0.65 $1,836 10 4 "DBL YELLOW - DETAIL 21 480 480 LF $0.65 $312 11 8" WHITE - DETAIL 38A 450 450 LF $0.65 $293 12 JARROWSILEGENDS 7 7 EA $200.00 $1,400 13 SIGNS - REGULATORY 5 3 EA $350.00 $1,050 14 RELOCATE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 2 2 EA $350.00 $700 15 ADJUST PULL BOX TO GRADE 5 5 EA $200.00 $1,000 16 AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2,575 2,575 SF $1.00 $2,575 17 SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING 2,575 2,575 SF $1.25 $3,219 18 90 DAY MAINTENANCE 1 c ` 1 LS $5,000,00 $5,000 r , F Sub Total $58,913 10% Cont $5,891 TOTAL $64,805 TOTAL C BO -SOD fal 12210y 0 Dlr[COSTW 05 -Aa -01 5446 +U _r A-01 "Mila, ill city Of Encinitas September 21, 2000 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Encinitas Ranch Apartments, L.L.C. 9823 Pacific Heights Boulevard, Suite J San Diego, CA 92121 Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwaler Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering Re: Case 98-295 MUP /DR /CDP "Poinsettia Ridge Apartments" {120 Apartments /3,000Sf Office near Vi Cantebria @ Garden View Rd} Grading Application 6538GR [Rough Grading /Erosion Control] A.P.N. 257- 040 -46 -00 Permit issuance requirements This correspondence shall serve to briefly summarize the Engineering Permit process. Drawing 6538 -G has been resubmitted by the Engineer of Work, and is subject to review by Subdivision Engineering staff. When the plan is deemed to be correct and all comments addressed, then staff will request submittal of mylar originals for approval by the Director of Engineering Services. An approval is valid for three years. In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per this Drawing, you will need to satisfy the following requirements: (1) Obtain all plan approvals. Provide four blueline copies of the approved Drawing, and one extra copy of the soil report by Leighton & Associates, dated April 26, 2000. (2) Post Security Deposit as follows (a) GRADING PERMIT... in the amount of $450,017.00 to guarantee performance of earthwork, storm drainage, site retaining walls, trench repair, and erosion control, and (b) PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT... in the amount of $2.412,00 to guarantee connection of site storm drainage to the public storm drain in Garden View Road and related trench repair. Up to 80% of the amount in 2(a) and 100% of the amount in 2(b) may be in the form of a Performance Bond issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Twenty percent of the amount in 2(a) has to be in the form of cash, certificates of deposit, a letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Any financial instrument's format is subject to approval. Complete the Security Obligation Agreement. (3) Pay non - refundable Inspection and Permit Fees as follows: Ia1GRADING PERMIT... of $15.501.00, and Ib)PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT... of $271.00. MM /to /J SG /f:case/ 1998/98 -295 i.doc I TEL -60 -63 }26061 L..0 - 6u -Ir• _�" iu5 S. \ulcan AvcnLJV. f.nainila.. (ililnmia 920243613 11 PD _(41- 633 -2700 +>• recycled paper (4) Provide the name, address, telephone number, and state license number of the construction contractor. Construction affecting public improvements is restricted to qualified contractors. Depending on the work to be done, the contractor will need to possess as follows either a valid: (a) Type "A" General Engineering, any work, (b) Type "C -12" Grading & Paving, any surface improvement or repair, or (c) Type "C -34" Pipeline, any storm drainage, state license, and meet the minimum insurance requirements as stated on the accompanying handout- (5) Execute the enclosed Encroachment Maintenance & Removal Covenant. The Engineer of Work will need to prepare Attachments "A" and "B" as per the samples; both the proposed connection at the entry on Garden View Road and the existing connection from the desilting basin, all to the public storm drain under the same road, will need to be described. Pay the applicable Recording Fee, payable to the County Recorder at the rate of $8.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. Submit for approval and recordation. (6) Provide a work schedule that includes all the work to be done at the site (7) Sign the Permits. Any authorized representative of the property owner may sign. Permits are valid for no more than one year and may expire earlier due to expirations on letters of credit and /or insurance policies. Once the Engineering Permits are issued, advance notice of 48 hours must be given prior to you or your contractor scheduling the mandatory pre - construction conference. See Grading Note #9. The Project Planner, Patrick Murphy, who can be contacted at (760) 633 -2696, may also need to attend. Informal phasing of the project may necessitate more than one such conference. A separate Right -of -way Construction Permit will be required for any work in the public rights - of -way of Via Cantebria and Garden View Road that is not shown on the approved Drawings. Typically, this work may include excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install potable water, sanitary sewer, reclaimed water, electric, gas, telephone, and cable television services, and construction of driveway approaches. A Permit Fee of $250.0 0 per application and a site plan will be required. The contractor license and insurance requirements will remain unchanged. Permits must be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the start of work. Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits are handled. A Traffic Control Plan, acceptable to the Traffic Engineering Division, will be required prior to the start of any work within the rights -of -way of Via Cantebria and Garden View Road. A typical plan shows all delineation, tapering, advance signage and temporary striping, barricades, flagman positions, and provides a schedule of operations. For more detail, contact Raymond Guarnes, Engineering Technician, at (760) 633-2704. Construction changes, prepared by the Engineer of Work, should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposit. M M /to /JSG /f. case/ 1998/98 -295 i.doc2 Prior to issuance of any Building Permit, the following requirements, but not necessarily all the requirements, will have to be satisfied: 1. The Landscape Plan will need to be approved and added to the Grading Plan. 11. The (Public) Improvement Plan will need to be approved, and the improvements secured to the satisfaction of the City and the relevant special districts. Per.ltem IV the improvements will have to be permitted and completed, including at least the first lift of pavement for vehicular parking and access. Ill. The Precise Grading Plan will need to be approved as a Construction Change, then added to the (Rough) Grading Plan. 1V. A Rough Grading Approval will be needed from the assigned Engineering Inspector. At a minimum, rough grading is defined as certified pad preparation and soil compaction, substantial completion of improvements, including underground utilities, and safe access. A proportional reduction of up to 75% of the Security Deposit assigned to the Grading Permit may be merited and forthcoming. A separate Improvement Permit is required to construct per proposed Drawing 6538 -1. The contractor licensing and insurance, and advance notification requirements remain unchanged. As- builts of Drawing 6538 -G, prepared by the Engineer of Work and approved by the Engineering Services Department, will be required prior to Final Inspection. The property owner and contractor will be responsible for the restoration of property corner monuments moved or destroyed by the grading activity. A licensed land surveyor or qualified civil engineer will be needed to do the work, subsequently filing a Comer Record with the County. See Grading Note #6. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection with respect to all Engineering Permits is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposits so assigned. Please note that Building Permit final inspections are a separate event apart from any Engineering Permit final inspection and are not necessarily coincidental. This letter is limited in scope. During the Building Permit process, you will need services and be subject to regulation from as follows: the Current Planning Division, Building Inspection Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, and San Dieguito Water District, all of the City, and the Leucadia County Water District, Encinitas Union School District, and San Dieguito Union High School District, all separate public agencies. Please inquire at their respective counters. Additional engineering requirements will be forthcoming during the Building Permit process, including, but not necessarily limited to, coordination of the building site plan with the grading plan, resolution of any outstanding public improvement issues, and assessment and collection of flood control and traffic mitigation fees. MM /to /JSG /f case/ 1998/98- 295i.doc3 If there should be a substantial delay in the start of your project, please request an update of this letter. It is highly recommended that you coordinate your work schedule with all the relevant departments and districts. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2780, or you may wish to visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center. Sincerely, a,9 - Jeffrey S. Garami Engineering Technician Subdivision Engineering cc Safino, Butcher & Ormonde. Inc., Engineer of work Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Ronald Ouigg, Engineering Inspector Greg Caudill, Engineering Technician permit/fHe enc General Construction Permit Security Obligation Agreement Encroachment Maintenance & Removal Covenant Right -of -way Construction Permit Standard Conditions Requirements for Proof Of Insurance Utility Trench Backfil/ and Resurfacing Standard M M /to /JSG /f:case/ 1998/98- 295i.doc4 ' T Y O F E N C I N 1 T S INEERING SERVICES DEPART! T 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 653SPE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARCEL NO. : 257- 040 -4600 PLAN NO.: 6538 -G JOB SITE ADDRESS: 700BLK VIA CANTEBRIA APPLICANT NAME ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 9823 PACIFIC HEIGHTS BLVD. #J PHONE NO.: 858 - 457 -4350 CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: 92121- CONTRACTOR : WESTERN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INC. PHONE NO.: 619 - 443 -8569 LICENSE NO.: 351178 LICENSE TYPE: B INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: ROYAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE POLICY NO. : KZB514135 POLICY EXP. DATE: 5/10/01 ENGINEER : SAFINO- BUTCHER- ORMONDE INC. 0 N 858- 560 -1141 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 12/06/00 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 5 /10 /01 PERMIT ISSUED BY: INSPECTOR: RONALD QUIGG --------------- ---- - - - - -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS ---------------------- - - - - -- 1. PERMIT FEE 271.00 2. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 3. SECURITY DEPOSIT .00 ----------------- -- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK - ------------------------ - - - - -- CONNECT SITE STORM DRAINAGE TO PUBLIC STORM DRAIN IN GARDEN VIEW RD, REPAIR TRENCH PER CITY STANDARD, 2 LOCATIONS, ALL PER COVENANT RE: MAINTENANCE /REMOVAL. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN REQUIRED PRIOR TO START OF WORK. - - -- INSPECTION - --------- - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. PRINT NAME �� CTRCLE ONE: 1�- NER/ 2. AGENT 3. OTHER OK 'I -7.00-> DATE SIGNED TELEPHONE NUMBER SB �t &0 sa &o, TNC. DATE: TO: FROM: RE: November 2, 2000 Tamara O'Neill City of Encinitas Daniel J. O'Rourke, P.E. MEMORANDUM Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Precise Grading Plan Submittal Job # 56122.20 Per our telephone conversation this week, I'm submitting the On -Site Precise Grading for the above - mentioned project. It seems that the August 28, 2000 submittal of these plans, intended for Building Department as well as Engineering Department review, was only checked for Building Department issues, and returned to us on October 30, 2000. Since the approval of Rough Grading, we understand you wish for these plans, as well as on- site LS & IRR plans to be incorporated into the approved Rough Grading set, by delta revision. For this to occur, they will need to be reviewed by Engineering. We know they will need to be placed on 24" x 36" standard City sheets, but since so much time has been lost, it would be appreciated if you could please proceed in checking the plans. IVY Landscape Architects will follow suit by submitting the LS & IRR plans sometime next week. Since you are on vacation next week, I'm sure all of the plans will be in place by the time you get to them. Please call me at (858) 560 -1141, if you have any questions. C— T Y O F E N C I N I T' S 1 1NEERING SERVICES DEPARTI-. ' 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 6538GI PARCEL NO. : 257 -040 -4600 PLAN NO.: 6538-6 JOB SITE ADDRESS: 700BLK VIA CANTEBRIA APPLICANT NAME ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 9823 PACIFIC HEIGHTS BLVD. #J PHONE NO.: 858- 457 -4350 CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: 92121— CONTRACTOR : CORNERSTONE COMMUNITIES CORPORATION LICENSE NO.: 697803 ENGINEER : SAFINO— BUTCHER — ORMONDE INC. PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 12/06/00 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 12/01/01 PERMIT ISSUED BY INSPECTOR: RONALD QUIGG ------------------- - - - - -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS PHONE NO.: 619 -458 -9700 LICENSE TYPE: B PHONE 858 -560 -1141 of 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 6,350.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 2. INSPECTION FEE 15,501.00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 450,017.00 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 ---------- --------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------------------- EARTHWORK /STORM DRAINAGE /SITE RETAINING WALLS /EROSION CONTROL FOR FUTURE 120 APARTMENTS /3,000SF OFFICE ON LOT 45, TRACT 94 -066, UNITS 1 -3. DIRT: 8.5KCY CUT /3.3KCY IMPORT /11.8KCY FILL. DRAIN: 1,240LF PIPE /2EA INLET /3EA CO /2EA CB /910LF DITCH /8EA AREA /lEA COLLAR /VAR REM. WALL: BKSF GRAVITY. LETTER DATED SEP 21 2000 APPLIES. WORK IN ROW BY SEPARATE PERMIT. - - -- INSPECTION ---------- - - ---- DATE -- - - ---- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. SIGNA JA{ V- KG65s DATE SIGNED PRINT NAME / TELEPHO E H BEP. Ci.Q CIRCLE ONE: 1W 6iER' �2. AGENT OTHER. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEI '. (,/r), f);. /;l IL•il lit, is iAk 1 4 uac TAIENT Coo-'a' Ynproveme ' Prolecls Disldct Support Services field Operolions Subdivision Engineering Grollic Engineering To be considered complete, a FIRST submittal for Improvement Plan processing must contain the following items: Improvement Plan k/Blueline prints of the Improvement Plan, including public planting & irrigation. • 5 copies if submitted in the Olivenhain Municipal Water District (OMWD) or Leucadia County Water District (LCWD). • 6 copies if submitted in the San Dieguito Water District (SDWD). N14 • Approved copies Map (TM) or Tentative Parcel Map (TPM), if applicable. P tat `` • Resolution of Approval or Notice of Decision, with project conditions, if applicable. 5ye/m 7-12-0 2 copies • Preliminary Title Report, less than 3 months old, otherwise, at a minimum, showing 5L/am- current vesting, trust deeds or other liens subject to subordination, and all easements. 2 copies Cost Estimate, itemizing public roadldrainage.rsewer /trail/park improvements. 2 copies • Soils Report, less than 3 years old and applicable to current project, per 2324.17 & 18. jvgm• 7_ /Z -tv • 2 copies • Structural Calculations, for all retaining walls and bridges in a public right -of -way /easement Allh • 2 copies • Hydrology Study, with map and hydraulic calculations. 2 copies • Cross Sections. S ✓�/Yl 7-1 Z' ov • 2 copies • Legal Descriptions/Plats/Closures, if dedications are required. NIA • 2 copies • Special Districts. (If project is within the jurisdiction of OMWD and/or LCWD, applicant A114 must submit separately and directly to the special district(s), as applicable. If project is within the jurisdiction of the SDWD and includes public water improvements, the same applies.) • Other / • 2 copies �y 1 {/ • Submittal Fee/Deposit. 14sh';j X r/9�f —= h? 9(�j 54/&4 • Completed and signed Engineering Development Application. If submitted together with a Final Nlap /Final Parcel Map and/or Grading Plan, the items can serve for both submittals. In certain cases, such as minor frontage improvements, not including a new traffic lane, or a sewer main extension, not necessitating major grading or any blasting, a soil report and hydrology study melt/ not ba needed. Improvement Plans should show only public improvements. ISQfARR/SA_Req_1mp_P1. dnd01.1399 1 of I HOROWITZ TAYLOR ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL L CIVIL CONSULTING STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS APR 0 6LUUI PROJECT: �O I S f I TA APA�TNl�nl �s CONCRETE STRENGTH AT TWENTY EIGHT DAYS: MASONRY: GRADE 'N' CONCRETE BLOCK F • M = MORTAR: TYPE S 1800 PSI GROUT: 2000 PSI REINFORCING STEEL: A -615 STRUCTURAL STEEL: A -36 LUMBER: DOUGLAS FIR —LARCH JOISTS BEAMS AND POSTS STUDS VEISMIC FORCE: WIND FORCE: DESIGN LOADS: SLOPING FLAT ROOFING PLYWOOD JOISTS INSUL. & CLG. MISC. TOTAL = SLOPING FLAT GRADE 40: GRADE 60: r- QFO-EF 2 S PSI �t Exp. #5 AND LESS (U.O.N.) #6 AND LARGER ,0. / zz � v #z STUD OR BETTER 7 REPORT BY: 2] ASSOGGA1§S -- REPORT NO. / QNo02S-02.-J SOIL PRESSURE:? C, FLOOR DEAD LOAD WALL DEAD LOAD INT E2M FLOORING INTERIOR 10 PSF PLYWOOD EXTERIOR 16 PSF JOISTS INSUL.& CLG MISC. TOTAL = FLOOR LIVE LIVE LOAD ]INTERIOR 40 PSF BALCONY 60 PSF (U.O.N.) EXIT WALKWAY 100 PSF These calculations are limited only to the items included herein, selected by the client and do not imply approval of any other portion of the structure by this office. These calculations are not valid if altered in any way, or not accompanied by a wet stamp and signature of the Fnoin��r of Rernrd . zJob�N4. r_; fDC51 tdB Date 3914 Murphy Canyon Rd. • Suite Al 00 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560.4383 • FAX (619) 5648842 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope: Job 0 Date: 4:59PM, 5 APR O7 er a -- Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page ' Ue Nw0601355. Vn 51.3. 22JUm 1939. Win32 In 199a99 cU3uIc z: \enercalc \01 318\01 318.ecw.Cakulations Description 4ft 2:1 Criteria 1,296 psf OK Retained Height = 4.00 ft Wall height above soil = 0.00 it Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem = 0.0 psf Design Summary Total Bearing Load = ' 1,377 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 6.50 in Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,296 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 1,658 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 9.6 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 8.7 psi OK Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios Total Force @ Section Overturning = 1.85 OK Sliding = 1.97 OK Sliding Calcs (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 687.51bs less 100% Passive Forces - 900.0 Ibs less 100% Friction Force= - 45C3 lbs Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ibs OK ....for 1.5: 1 Stability = 0.0 Ibs OK i SolI Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 55.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 It FootingiiSoil Friclioi = 0.330 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 6.00 in Stem Construction fc = 2,500 psi Fy = Design height it Wall Material Above "Ht" _ Thickness = Rebar Size = Rebar Spacing = Rebar Placed at = Design Data = 727 fb/FB +fa/Fa = Total Force @ Section Ibs = Moment.... Actual ft-#= Moment... ..Allowable = Shear..... Actual psi= Shear..... Allowable psi= Footing Design Results fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Toe Heel Factored Pressure = 1,658 0 psf Mu': Upward = 922 0 ft -# Mu': Downward = 195 580 ft-# Mu: Design = 727 580 ft -# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 9.62 8.71 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd = Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd In = Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Concrete Data Footing Strengths & Dimensions fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 1.00 it Heel Width = 1.50 Total Footing Wdtf =5iT psi= Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in Key Depth = 12.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.50 it Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in Sp tem Stem OK 0.00 Masonry 8.00 # 5 24.00 Edge 0.640 440.0 586.7 916.4 7.7 19.4 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in= 30.00 Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Ht. in = 6.00 Wall Weight = 78.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in = 5.25 Masonry Data fm psi= 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Special Inspection = No Modular Ratio'n' = 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.000 Equiv. Solid Thick. In = 7.60 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi= Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes b Spacings Toe: Not req'd, Mu <S' Fr Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Key: Not req'd, Mu < S ' Fr To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block Information will be printed on each page. Pm. 510300 Uwe ICN.0601355, Yo 5.1.3, 22 Jun 3999. Wm32 Description 4ft 2:1 Title: Dsgnr: Description Scope: Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Job # Dale: 4:59PM, 5 APR 01 2 Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Fora Distance Moment Item Ibs it ft-# Ibs ft it-# Heel Active Pressure = 687.5 1.67 1,145.8 Toe Active Pressure = 0.50 Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = Selsmicl.oad = Total 687.5 O.T.M. = 1.145.8 ResistinglOverturning Ratio = 1.85 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,376.6 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Soil Over Heel = 388.7 2.08 763.9 Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem= 0.00 Soil Over Toe = 55.0 0.50 27.5 Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 312.0 1.33 416.0 Earth @ Stem Transitions Footing Weight = 375.0 1.25 468.7 Key Weight = 150.0 1.00 150.0 Vert. Component - 118.0 250 294.9 Total = 1.376.6 Ibs R.M.= 2,121.1 To specify your title block on Title : Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 4:59PM, 5 APR 01 selection on the main menu and Description enter your title block information Scope: will be printed on each page. J 91030° Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 1 n awO601333. Ver 5.1.3, 22JUni999, w,n32 9 (c) I9e3"ENSCALC z: \enercalc \01 18 \01 318.ecw:Calculations Description 6ft 2:1 Criteria = 2,000.0 psf Retained Height = 6.00 ft Wall height above soil = 0.00 it Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 55.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 ft FootingIlSoil Fricticr Wind on Stem = 0.0 psf Sal height to Ignore for passive pressure Design Summary Total Bearing Load = ; 2,714 lbs ...resultant ecc. = 9.28 in Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,853 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,256 psf F B + fa/Fa fb / o.78a 0.907 0.330 6.00 in Footing Strengths & Dimensions rc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 1.00 It Heel Width = 2.50 Total Footing Widtr = -� Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in Key Depth = 16.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.75ft Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in Stem Construction Top Stem 2nd = 15.5 psi OK Stem OK Stem OK Design height ft= 2.67 0.00 Wall Material Above "Ht" = Masonry Masonry Thickness = 8.00 12.00 Reber Size = # 5 # 5 Rebar Spacing = 24.00 24.00 Rebar Placed at = Edge Edge ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 15.5 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 20.5 psi OK Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios Shear ..... Overturning = 1.84 OK Sliding = 1.53 OK Sliding Calcs (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 1,347.5 lbs less 100% Passive Force= - 1,166.710.5 less 100% Friction Force= - 895.7 lbs Added Force Req'd = 0.0 lbs OK ....for 1.5: 1 Stability = 0.0 lbs OK Footing Design Results Short Term Factor Toe Heel Factored Pressure = 2,256 0 psf Mu': Upward = 1,512 0 ft-# Mu': Downward = 224 2,326 ft-# Mu: Design = 1,288 2,326 ft-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 15.53 20.53 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Total Force @ Section lbs = Moment.... Actual ft-#= Moment..... Allowable ft-#= Shear..... Actual psi = Shear ..... Allawable psi= 304.9 990.0 338.5 1,980.0 916.4 2,192.4 5.3 9.9 19.4 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in = 30.00 Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht. in = 30.00 Wall Weight psf= 78.0 Reber Depth 'd' In = 5.25 Masonry Data I'm psi= 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Special inspection = No Modular Ratio'n' = 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.000 Equiv. Solid Thick. In = 7.60 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi = Fy psi = 19.4 30.00 8.09 124.0 9.00 1,500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.000 11.62 Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Heel: #4@ 19.75 in, #5@ 30.50 in, #6@ 43.25 in, #7@ 48.25 in, #8@ 48.25 in, #9@ 4 Key: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr To specify your title block on Title : Job # these rive lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 4:59PM, 5 APR 01 selection on the main menu and Description enter your title block information Scope will be printed on each page. J KWM Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page z R.Lr'. RYI- (1601355, Yn 5 I ]. 22 luro 1999. w,32 t<1198399 ENEnceEC z: \enercalc\ 1318 \01318.ecw:Calculations Description 6ft 2:1 Summary of Overturning &Resisting Forces &Moments .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs ft ft-# Ibs it fF# Heel Active Pressure = 1,347.5 2.33 3,144.2 Soil Over Heel = 990.0 2.75 2,722.5 Toe Active Pressure = 0.50 Sloped Soil Over Heel _ Surcharge Over Toe = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = 0.00 Load @ Stem Above Soil = Soil Over Toe = 55.0 0.50 27.5 SeismicLoad = Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weighl - 590.8 1.43 842.9 Total = 1,347.5 O.T.M. = 3,144.2 Earth @ Stem Transitions= 122.1 1.83 223.9 ResistinglOverturning Ratio ' = 1.84 Footing Weight = 525.0 1.75 918.7 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 2,714.1 Ibs Key Weight = 200.0 1.25 250.0 Vert. Component _ 231.2 3.50 809.3 Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Total = 2,714.1 Ibs R.M.- 5,794.8 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be Drinted on each Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope: Job # Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 flev: 510300 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Uur: MWt355. V e r 5 . 13, 22 JUm1999, Win32 Page 1 060 (c) 196399 ENERCNLC CAec \01318.ecw:Calcu ations Description 4ft level Criteria 876 psi OK Retained Height = 4.00 it Wall height above soil = 0.00 it Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem = 0.0 psf Design Summary Total Bearing Load = 1,359 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 3.06 in Soil Pressure @ Toe = 876 psi OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 211 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 1,116 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 269 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 4.7 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 11.5 psi OK Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios Overturning = 2.85 OK Sliding = 1.71 OK Sliding Calcs (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 437.5 Ibs less 100% Passive Force= - 300.0 Ibs less 100% Friction Force= - 448.4 lbs Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ibs OK ....for 1.5: 1 Stability = 0.0 Ibs OK _Soil Data = Allow Soil Beadng = 2,000.0 psi Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 it FoofingllSoil Fiictiot = 0.330 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 6.00 in Footing Design Results = 78.0 Toe Heel Factored Pressure = 1,116 269 psf Mu': Upward = 355 0 ft-# Mu': Downward = 100 0 ft-# Mu: Design = 255 635 ft-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 4.68 11.48 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Speed = Heel Reinforcing = None Speed in = Key Reinforcing = None Speed Concrete Data Stem Construction Design height it Wall Material Above "Ht" _ Thickness = Rebar Size = Rebar Spacing = Rebar Placed at = Design Data tb /FB + fa/Fa = Total Force @ Section Ibs = Moment.... Actual ft-#= Moment..... Allowable = Shear..... Actual psi = Shear..... Allowable psi = Stem OK 0.00 Masonry 8.00 # 5 24.00 Edge Footing Strengths & Dimensions fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 0.67 it Heel Width = 1.83 Total Footing Width = 2-W Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 0.00 in Key Depth = 0.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.00 ft Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm = 3.00 in 0.407 280.0 373.3 916.4 4.9 19.4 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in = 30.00 Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht. in = 6.00 Wall Weight = 78.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in= 5.25 Masonry Data I'm psi= 1,500 Fs psi= 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Special Inspection = No Modular Ration' = 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.000 Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 7.60 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi = Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: Not req'd, Mu <S' Fr Heel: Not req'd, Mu <S' Fr Key: No key defined To specify your title block on Title : Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 6:31PM, 31 MAR 01 selection on the main menu and Description enter your title block information Scope: will be printed on each page. ""' 91030° Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 2 U 510-0601355, v�. 5.1.3. 22JUn1999, win32 (01%3"EnEP LO cAec \01318.ecw:Calculahore Description Oft level Summary of Overturnin 8 Resistin Forces 8 Moments .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs It ft-# Ibs It tt -# Heel Active Pressure = 437.5 1.67 729.2 Soil Over Heel = 513.3 1.92 983.9 Toe Active Pressure = 0.50 Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = Seismicl-oad = Total = 437.5 O.T.M. = 729.2 Resisting /Overturning Ratio = 2.85 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,358.9 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Sloped Soil Over Heel Surcharge Over Heel Adjacent Footing Load Axial Dead Load on Stem = 0.00 Soil Over Toe = 36.7 0.33 12.2 Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 312.0 1.00 312.0 Earth @ Stem Transitions= Footing Weight = 375.0 1.25 468.7 Key Weight = Vert. Component _ 121.9 2.50 304.8 Total a 1,358.9 Ibs R.M.= 2,081.7 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block Information will be printed on each page. Title : Dsgnr. Description Scope: Ib.: 510300 UvcrcVl 1355.vn5.1.3.22Jun.1999.%n32 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design M 199393 ENE LC Description 5.33ft level Criteria -` Retained Height = 5.33 ft Wall height above soil = 0.00 it Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem = 0.0 psf Design Summary Total Bearing load = X2,443 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 3.21 in Sal Pressure @ Toe = 1,019 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 378 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 1,312 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 486 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 6.2 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 25.2 psi OK Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios Total Force @ Section Overturning = 3.45 OK Sliding = 1.58 OK Sliding Calcs (Vertical Component Used) Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 it FootingjjSoii Fnctiot = 0.330 Sal height to ignore for passive pressure = 6.00 in Stem Construction = 701.2 lbs Design height ft = Wall Material Above 'Ht* _ Thickness = Rebar Size = Rebar Spacing = Rebar Placed at = Design Data Mu': Downward = fb /FB ♦ fa/Fa = Total Force @ Section Ibs = MomenL_.Actual ft-#= Moment..... Allowable = Shear..... Actual psi = Shear..... Allowable psi = Lateral Sliding Force = 701.2 lbs less 100% Passive Foros= - 300.0 Ibs less 100% Friction Force= - 806.2 Ibs Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ibs OK ....for 1,5: 1 Stability = 0.0 Ibs OK Footing Design Results Total Footing Width Toe Heel Factored Pressure = 1,312 486 psf Mu' : Upward = 433 0 ft_# Mu': Downward = 100 0 ft-# Mu: Design = 333 1,502 ft-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 6.18 25.15 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd Heel Reinforcing = None Spec d Key Reinforcing = None Spedd Job # Date: 6:31 PM. 31 MAR 01 Page 1 Footing Strengths 8 Dimensions fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 0.67 It Heel Width = 2.83 Total Footing Width psi= Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in Key Depth = 0.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.00 ft Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in Stem OK 0.00 Masonry 8.00 # 5 24.00 Edge 0.964 497.2 883.3 916.4 8.7 19.4 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. In = 30.00 Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht. In = 6.33 Wall Weight = 78.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in= 5.25 Masonry Data I'm psi= 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Special Inspection = No Modular Ration' = 25.78 Short Tenn Factor = 1.000 Equiv, Solid Thick. In = 7.60 Masonry Block Type - Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi = Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S - Fr Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Key: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block Information will be printed on each page. Per: 5I0300 Uw KW 0601355. V., 5 1 , 33 Jul 1999, wm32 ;q 1983.99 ENERG9LC Description 5.33ft level Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope: Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Job # Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 Page 2 Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment H N M the a NJ! Heel Active Pressure = 101.2 2.T7 1,4r`J.o Toe Active Pressure = 0.50 Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Fooling Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SeismicLoad = Total = 701.2 O.T.M. = 1,479.5 Resisting /Overturning Ratio = 3.45 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 2,443.1 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Soil Over Heel = 1,270.3 2.42 3,069.9 Sloped Soil Over Hee: _ Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = 0.00 Soil Over Toe = 36.7 0.33 12.2 Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 415.7 1.00 415.7 Earth @ Stem Transitions= Footing Weight = 525.0 1.75 918.7 Key Weight = 0.50 Vert. Component _ 195.4 3.50 684.0 Total = 2,443.1 Ibs R.M.= 5,100.6 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block Information will be printed on each Title: Dsgnr: Description Scope : Job # Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 A... 510300 Page 1 U.O. MN 0�61355..;� 513. 1Z bM939 W..33 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design .. o.,. r' \a knl ITA xw r.Alridafinna 7.33ft level Criteria = 2,000.0 psf Retained Height 7.33 ft Wall height above soil = 0.00 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem = 0.0 psf Soil Data Allow Sal Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 ft FoobngIISoil Frictiot = 0.330 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 6.00 in Footing Strengths & Dimensions rc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 1.00 ft Heel Width = 2.50 Total Footing Width =6rf Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in Key Depth = 12.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.75 ft Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in Design Summary Stem Construction Top Stem 2nd Stem OK Stem OK Total Bearing Load = 3,143 IDs Design height ft= 2.67 0.00 ...resultant ecc. = 7.38 in Wall Material Above -Ht' = Masonry Masonry Thickness 8.00 12.00 Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1.847 psf OK Rebar Size - # 5 # 5 Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Rebar Spacing = 24.00 16.00 Allowable = 2.000 psi Rebar Placed at = Edge Edge Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable Design Data ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,166 psf fb /FB + fa/Fa = 0.544 0.996 ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Total Force @ Section lbs = 380.0 940.3 Footing Shear @ Tce = 15.3 psi OK Moment.... Actual ft-# = 590.3 2,297.4 Footing Shear @ Heel = 25.3 psi OK Moment..... Allowable ft-#= 916.4 2,563.0 Allowable = 85.0 psi Shear..... Actual psi = 6.7 9.6 Wall Stability Ratios Overturning = 2.06 OK Shear ..... Allowable psi = 19.4 19.4 Sliding = 1.60 OK Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in= 30.00 30.00 Sliding Cates (Vertical Component Used) Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Ht. in = 30.00 6.36 Lateral Sliding Force = 1,214.3 lbs Wall Weight psi= 78.0 124.0 less 100% Passive Force= - 900.0 lbs Rebar Depth 'd' in = 5.25 9.00 less 100% Friction Force= - 1,037.3 lbs Masonry Data psi = 1,500 ,500 Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ib s OK Fs psi Fs 24,000 244,000 ....for 1.5: 1 Stability = 0.0 Ibs OK Said Grouting _ Yes Yes Footing Design Results Special Inspection = No No Modular Ration' = 25.78 25.78 Toe- Heel Short Term Factor = 1.000 1.000 Factored Pressure = 2,166 0 psf Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 7.60 11.62 Mu': Upward = 1,485 0 ft-# Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Mu': Downward = 224 2,913 ft -# Concrete Data Mu: Design = 1,261 2,913 ft-# rc PSI= Actual 1 -Way Shear = 15.31 25.33 psi Fy psi= Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Other Acceptable Sizes i Spacings Toe Reinforcing = None Speed Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Heel Reinforcing = None Speed Heel: #4@ 19.75 in, #5@ 30.50 in, #6@ 43.25 in, #7@ 48.25 in, #8@ 48.25 in, #9@ 4 Key Reinforcing = None Speed Key: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block Information will be printed on each page. Mir 5103 ~ Mp -0501355. Vn 51.3.22M 1999...n32 Description 7 Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope : Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Job # Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 Page 2 Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments —� .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment item Ibs ft f4# Ibs It ft-# Heel Active Pressure = Toe Active Pressure = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SeismicLoad = 1,214.3 2.78 3,3711 0.50 Total = 1214.3 O.T.M. = 3,371.7 Resisting /Overturning Ratio ' = 2.06 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 3,143.3 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Soil Over Heel = Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = Soil Over Toe _ Surcharge Over Toe Stem Weight(s) _ Earth @ Stem Transitions= Footing Weight = Key Weight = Vert. Component Total = 1,209.5 2.75 3,326.0 0.00 55.0 0.50 27.5 694.6 1.41 981.3 170.9 1.83 313.3 525.0 1.75 918.7 150.0 1.25 187.5 338.4 3.50 1,184.5 3,143.3 Ibs R.M.= 6,938.8 To specify your title block on Title : Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 6:31PM, 31 MAR 01 selection on the main menu and Description enter your title block Information Scope will be printed on each page. uwl SID VN5.1.3,221vn' 1999.WP32 Cantilevered Retaining Page 1 (d 19a3A9 ENE LC g Wall Design c \ec \01318.ecw: Calculations Description 9.33ft level Criteria 1,954 psf OK Retained Height = 9.33 ft Wall height above soil = 0.00 It Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem = 0.0 psf Design Summary Total Bearing Load = 3,971 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 9.24 in Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,954 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,108 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 25.5 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 23.5 psi OK Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios 8.00 Overturning = 1.84 OK Sliding = 1.67 OK soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 ft FooengIlSoil Frictioi = 0.330 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 6.00 in Footing Strengths & Dimensions rc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 2.00 it Heel Width = 2.25 Total Footing Width less 100% Friction Force= - 1,310.51bs Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in Key Depth = 24.00 in Key Distance from Tae = 1.75 H Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in Stem Construc I Top Stem 2nd - 1,800.0 Ibs less 100% Friction Force= - 1,310.51bs Stem 0K Stem OK Design height ft= 4.00 0.00 Wall Material Above 'Ht" = Masonry Masonry Thickness = 8.00 16.00 Reber Size = # 5 # 6 Rebar Spacing = 24.00 16.00 Reber Placed at = Edge Edge Design Data Pc psi = fb /FB + fa/Fa = 0.964 0.892 Total Force @ Section Ibs = 497.2 1,523.4 Moment.... Actual ft -# = 883.3 4,737.6 Moment..... Allowable ft-# = 916.4 5,312.4 Shear..... Actual psi= 8.7 10.7 Sliding Calks (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 1,867.4 lbs less 100% Passive Force= - 1,800.0 Ibs less 100% Friction Force= - 1,310.51bs Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ibs OK ....for 1.5 : 1 Stability = 0.0 Ibs OK Footing Design Results 1,500 Tqg_ Heel Factored Pressure = 2,108 0 psf Mu': Upward = 4,640 0 ft -# Mu': Downward = 781 2,098 ft-# Mu: Design = 3,859 2,098 ft# Actual i -Way Shear = 25.54 23.47 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 65.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Speed Heel Reinforcing = None Speed Key Reinforcing = None Speed Shear..... Allowable psi = 19.4 Bar Devetop ABOVE Ht. In = 30.00 Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht. In = 30.00 Wall Weight psf= 78.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in = 5.25 Masonry Data I'm psi= 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Special Inspection = No Modular Ration' = 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.000 Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 7.60 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data Pc psi = Fy psi = 19.4 36.00 7.67 164.0 13.00 1.500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.000 15.62 Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: #4@ 17.75 in, #5@ 27.50 in, #6@ 39.00 in, #7@ 48.25 in, #8@ 48.25 in, #9@ 4 Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S ' Fr Key. #4@ 18.75 in, #5@ 28.75 in, #6@ 40. To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each paste. Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope : Job # Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 Rev 510)0° Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 2 1 Ufer. xW 0601355, Ver 5.1.3. 33JUn 1939. w�n3'. g (q 198399 ENERCALC c:\ec\01 318.ecw;Cakulations 1 Description 9.33ft level Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments ..... OVERTURNING ..... ..... RESISTING ..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs ft ft -# Ibs It ft-# Heel Active Pressure = 1,667.4 3.44 6,430.1 Toe Active Pressure = 0.50 Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SeismicLoad = Total = 1,867.4 O.T.M. = 6,430.1 ReslstinglOverturning Ratio = 1.84 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 3,971.3 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Soil Over Heel = 940.8 3.79 3,567.1 Sloped Soil Over Heel _ Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem= 0.00 Soil Over Toe = 110.0 1.00 110.0 Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 11071.7 2.54 2,719.4 Earth @ Stem Transitions 3.00 1,172.6 Footing Weight = 637.5 2.13 1,354.7 Key Weight = 300.0 2.25 675.0 Vert. Component = 520.5 4.25 2,211.9 Total = 3,971.3 Ibs R.M.= 11,810.7 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block Information will be orinted on each Title: Dsgnr: Description: Scope: Job # Date: 6:31PM, 31 MAR 01 A.. 510300 Page 1 U� .,"MI355.V..5.13,nJw.1999.%ro32 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design M 19!3.99 ENERC C c �ec�0l 318.ecw:Calcula tions Description 1 Oft level Criteria 1,681 psf OK Retained Height = 10.00 ft Wall height above soil = 0.00 # Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem = 0.0 psf Design Summary Total Bearing Load = '5,468 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 6.44 In Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,681 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 403 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 1,931 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 463 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 26.7 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 42.7 psi OK Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios Ibs = Overturning = 2.47 OK Sliding = 1.70 OK Sliding Calcs (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 2.117.5 lbs less 100% Passive Force= - 1,800.0 Ibs less 100% Friction Force= - 1,804.61b5 Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ibs OK ....for 1.5: 1 Stability = 0.0 Ibs OK Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psi Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 it FootingIlSoil Frictioi = 0.330 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 6.00 in Stem Construction fc = 2,500 psi Design height It Wall Material Above'HY = Thickness = Rebar Size = Rebar Spacing = Rebar Placed at = Design Data = 3,882 fb /FB +fa/Fa = Total Force @ Section Ibs = Moment.... Actual ft-#= Moment..... Allowable ft-# _ Shear..... Actual psi = Shear..... Allowable psi = Footing Design Results fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Too Heel Factored Pressure = 1,931 463 psi Mu': Upward = 4,664 0 ft_# Mu' : Downward = 781 6,353 ft-# Mu: Design = 3,882 6,353 it-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 26.75 42.72 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Speed = Heel Reinforcing = None Speed In = Key Reinforcing = None Speed Concrete Data Footing Strengths & Dimensions fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min, As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 2.00 it Heel Width = 3.25 Total Footing Width =S Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in Key Depth = 24.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 1.75 it Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in 2nd 3rd = Stem OK Stem oK 4.67 0.00 Masonry Masonry 8.00 16.00 # 5 # 6 24.00 8.00 Edge Edge 0.964 497.2 883.3 916.4 8.7 19.4 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in = 30.00 Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Ht. in = 30.00 Wall Weight psf = 78.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in = 5.25 Masonry Data fm psi= 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Special Inspection = No Modular Ration' = 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.000 Equiv. Solid Thick. In = 7.60 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi = Fy psi = 0.859 1,750.0 5,833.3 6,792.2 12.8 19.4 36.00 36.00 164.0 13.00 1,500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.000 15.62 Stem OK 0.00 Masonry 16.00 # 6 8.00 Edge 0.859 1,750.0 5,833.3 6,792.2 12.8 19.4 36.00 6.00 164.0 13.00 1,500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.000 15.62 Other Acceptable Sizes b Spacings Toe: #4@ 17.75 in, #5@ 27.25 in, #6@ 38.75 in, #7@ 48.25 in, #8@ 48.25 in, #9@ 4 Heel: #4@ 10.75 in, #5@ 16.50 in, #6@ 23.50 in, #7@ 32.00 in, #8@ 42.00 in, #9@ 4 Key: #4@ 18.75 in, #5@ 28.75 in, #6@ 40. To specify your title block on Title : Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 ..... OVERTURNING ..... Description selection on the main menu and enter your title block information Scope will be printed on each page. Distance 51.3. 2P1un1 99 wm31 " e1r9. "K8w -09 °6 °E1 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page e z RRch`eI 3° NNU Ir c: \ec \Ol 318.ecw:CaICulatlons Description 1 Oft level ft-# Summary of Overturnin & Resistin Forces 8 Moments ..... OVERTURNING ..... .... RESISTING ..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs ft ft -# Ibs ft ft-# Heel Active Pressure = 2,117.5 3.67 7,764.2 Soil Over Heel = 2,108.3 4.29 9.048.3 Toe Active Pressure = 0.50 Sloped Sal Over Hee' _ Surcharge Over Toe = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem= 0.00 Load Q Stem Above Soil = Soil Over Toe = 110.0 1.00 110.0 SeismicLoad = Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) - 1,181.6 2.55 3,012.4 Total = 2,117.5 O.T.M. = 7,764.2 Earth Cn Stem Transitions = 390.9 3.00 1,172.6 ResistinglOverturning Ratio ' = 2.47 Footing Weight = 787.5 2.63 2,067.2 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 5,468.5 Ibs Key Weight = 300.0 2.25 675.0 Vert. Component - 590.2 5.25 3,098.3 Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Total = 5,468.5 Ibs R.M.= 19,183.8 To specify your title block on Title : Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 Wall height above soil = Description selection on the main menu and 0.00: 1 enter your title block Information Scope: will be printed on each page. 110.00 pcf U 510300 Rs 5103M KWM1355 . �n 5 1 ], 2Plm 1999, W�n32 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 1 M 196399 ENERCeLC cAeo \01318.ecw:Calculations Description 12ft level Criteria = 2,000.0 psf Retained Height = 12.00 ft Wall height above soil = 0.00 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem = 0.0 psf Design Summary Total Bearing Load = X7,926 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 7.25 in Soil Data Allow Soll Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 It FootingIlSoil Frictiot = 0.330 Soil height to ignore = 12.00 in for passive pressure = 6.00 in Stem Construction Top Stem Fy = 60,000 psi $tem O Design height ft= 6.6 Wall Material Above "Ht" = Mason Thickness in = 8.0 Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,899 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 540 psi OK Allowable 2.000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,216 psi ACI Factored @ Heel = 630 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 28.5 psi OK Focbng Shear @ Heel = 51.3 psi OK Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios Overturning = 2.55 OK Sliding = 1.53 OK Sliding Calm (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 3,072.3 Ibs less 100`Y, Passive Force= - 2,071.9 Ibs less 100% Friction Force= - 2,615.7 Ibs Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ibs OK ....for 1.5: 1 Stability = 0.0 Ibs OK Footing Design Results Tog_ Heel Factored Pressure = 2,216 630 psf Mu': Upward = 7,969 0 ftal Mu' :Downward = 1,363 13,379 ft-# Mu: Design = 6,606 13,379 tt Actual 1 -Way Shear = 28.47 51.33 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Rebar Size = # Rebar Spacing = 24.0 Rebar Placed at = Edg Footing Strengths &Dimensions Tc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 2.50 ft Heel Width = 4.00 Total Fooling Wid& = - -1.56 Footing Thickness = 15.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in Key Depth = 24.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 1.75 It Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in 2nd 3rd 4th K Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK 7 4.67 2.00 0.00 ry Masonry Masonry Masonry 0 12.00 16.00 16.00 5 # 5 # 6 # 6 0 16.00 8.00 8.00 e Edge Edge Edge maavnp vaw I'm psi= 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Fs fb /FB +fa/Fa = 0.954 0.096 0.859 0.742 Total Force @ Section Ibs = 497.2 940.3 1,750.0 2,520.0 Moment.-Actual ft-#= 883.3 2,297.4 5,833.3 10,080.0 Moment..... Allowable it-#= 916.4 2,563.0 6,792.2 13,584.4 Shear..... Actual psi = 8.7 9.6 12.8 18.4 Shear..... Allowable psi = 19.4 19.4 19.4 38.7 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. In = 30.00 30.00 36.00 36.00 Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Ht. in = 30.00 30.00 36.00 8.44 Wall Weight psf= 78.0 124.0 164.0 164.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in= 5.25 9.00 13.00 13.00 maavnp vaw I'm psi= 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Yes Yes Yes Special Inspection = No No No Yes Modular Ratio'n' = 25.78 25.78 25.78 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 7.60 11.62 15.62 15.62 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight rc psi = Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: #4@ 14.00 In, #5@ 21.75 In, #6@ 30.75 in, #7@ 42.00 in, #8@ 48.25 in, #9@ 4 Heel: #4@ 7.00 in, #5@ 10.75 In, #6@ 15.00 in, #7@ 20.50 in, #8@ 27.00 in, #9@ 34 Key: #4@ 18.75 in, #5@ 28.75 in, #6@ 40. To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each page. Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope : Job # Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 ft, 510300 U., KW O0o 13555V, 513, 22- J° ^IM. Wm32 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design f\ age. 12ft level summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments ...- OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs It ft-# Ibs ft ft-# Heel Active Pressure = 3,072.3 4.42 13,569.5 Soil Over Heel = 3,520.0 5.17 18,186.7 Toe Active Pressure = 0.58 Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Toe = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = 0.00 Load @ Stem Above Soil = Soil Over Toe = 137.5 1.25 171.9 SeismicLoad = Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) - 1,429.6 3.04 4,347.2 Total = 3,072.3 O.T.M. = 13,569.5 Earth @ Stem Transitions = 464.2 3.53 1,636.9 Resisting /Overturning Ratio = 2.55 Footing Weight = 1,218.7 3.25 3,960.9 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 7,926.3 Ibs Key Weight = 300.0 2.25 675.0 Vert. Component - 856.3 6.50 5,565.8 Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Total = 7,926.3 Ibs R.M. = 34,544.4 SB ^ Qr 0 PROJECT 'vlAlSr-cTT?A F186F- ri1PAye!TftJk S SB &O, INC. 60122. zo uMIA,Aky HY69Ol a &7 Sway X02 6A1 -S1R7- PR -GGSE G"IIA16— EnJC1N iT-AS P- AnNGF{ APT-11 l LC 106-7,7 (JEST -U1c-�J 10A,eKwAy :SA lo b(G& -o, C-A. 9Z( 262 85-5- 566 -18ZO /0o -6FES O'gONY e x ° No.47677 , Exp. 12 -31 -030 ARIL 67,200/ D.-J-0. APR 0 6 ZUUI H2�,en -F-tl �3y: 7s B �o) INC. 3615 KcAR-Ny VILLA 2oA,6 Svlr� Zo 1 SAN biEGo1 CA- 92123 85g— 560 - 114 I NVICL - W/0%Qov2,e- RCE ¢7677, EX10 iz -3i -o3 M.- 31.15 Kr:u'nv Villa 0uad. Suite 201. tian lli,80. (:A 92123 1858) 560 -1141 FAX 18581 56-8157 'X)117 Arrow Raut,. Suit, 120. l(anrhu Cucamonga. (A 91730 VX)lh 948 -3450 FAX 14X)91948 -2750 27715.I,44-rsnn Av,no,. ?mw 201. 1',nurula. (A 92 5911 0091 69 3 -3 310 FAX VNI91 693 -3320 !�;)A >r SB &o SB &O, INC. PROJECT PO/NSErT74 "e 46F /M7z o 4 vcr /on/�i�ti� R�sE �i1�A/LTl7I�/t/JS Slo)22.7D Pu/ZPU$F OF T7fi1 oN- S /r�,42tuSF G,z,441^16 /fyO�ot o6y Srv4Y /S 7a A1276W4 777t- A4eC-Vl0Wl tv6H 6Z441n/G //YU'LDLQ�iY Srv4V� P/LC:'A By SQ �0, //✓c.) 64rF6 /s, 200 O 4000y 4r7WCVe -4), 777t- P2EViovl SyAdy 446 e6SS" T?/r- .bv6N 61240E Cov✓D /non/,( SO 7-1,4E- aV -Si rF "77e -V ve" SYX7FM WAS h/ /,'V 440r0v-vrE' C+"PAUTy! 771L— /?oV6N C-rt 0ln/G Sr�i�r� SS�S7��1 /NCGVOE -'J /�io /„��i G✓Ipi�`J�v 7?iF A10 k/ k/ BF P42r OF 77/� /f e5 +f/Z4 6 F Fctt72 Q/Z,4 /n/ SY1 rtr• -r/ 4"4 A/ /eC A/O,— a /&czrZY, /fur /'�n-''c cfWr 4 llompoA/ cry rNF aPzn,#a swe-4/n/6 Ewl/r2d-l0F &Umv,46Cj /i'lAivCY 77/r- %c.o e-11 $I 66-VCL 66—VC of 7Nr 64e/,'V046X 77{t- W, 4 --MIZ� FY /F 7�F 012.4) uA 6-F �A r ( i u(, ON 77{ E /'9V1 G'4I'V6 �coT7'�2r�✓l /S .f,/v4 (24wveyE-�v /V " Y7-0cM VId /epoc jc.411vS Farr_ 7-ft 11'I05T PAS, T}+'S VAibc- it-ou'- 4 5 ✓r_aovvns 7-t-� eV(L,Z)NG F-V TPr -4I-,T AN6 600j)e4S Trite r—,W,c 4 io —1 it,=— 12Wb t4 6"41.-J& "7-MVAJK" SyS1 E , /N 6RaEr -) 7+E' 61-)SI7F 5YSTFYY1 C" 6E DESca46e6 As FDLLo kJS • 04 -SIrF Pak-c4sc- Crw,Aj(TC,1&k '`a "_remS Amv6 6AYW&) VtpJTa A- 4-c.o. ti I l LI NC l ` t 2 UNS 4L OA)( VIA CA&f",uA 7D A- 4 CL "NovT' LrNE ' Ctl _ ►2uAS -F �evj SOvTH 514E Of Go(M YArt6 7b ONSr r'F 'SYSTEwI IAI 02+vE AISLE t WNS Fn&m A)Onr-#4 SI I�E of oop"A -a4 no On/St rE s`1S7�w1 IN 4 &4VE A I S t,E iFC I JOB NO DESIGNED BY IGHECKEDBY IDATE I Stitt t NO SIMI . INC. 3615 Kearny Villa liva(I. Suite 201, tint Dirge. (A 92123 18581 51.0 -1141 FAX 1858) 5()() -8157 '8817 Arrow liuuue. Suit,- 120. Rancho Cucamonga. (:A 91730 I'NN)) 948 -3450 FAX (W')) 948 -2750 277153, -M-mmm Avetim, Suile 201. 'I'rmtvvla. CA 925901'X8)1693 -3310 FAX 1'X)')) (,93 - 33.21) s� B XI+ 0 PROJECT PC INSc7 -riA QIQ(iE _ SSBB &O. INC. AP44 -T-m wz I SE, 12z.20 CPT-ta,A ��cy = ioa yC*L r L&m Trtu- r Y-)6t4 ,N� sT�c /fC_ i9. sl7f /.v. G' = D,9T Fret ti°4:4�Di°r 1,eo.ovFO 10ae-4 '0.4'r rort NAnxtr_ ox- ftAvq-d AltAr '4v pcc ,°, OF 7H-V7 061&INAL Hy/)rZ-ouc6v Ma+° AAZ SC,&FAv47nL P,pe- LAYbvT ►+As ►� Q„ ,a�..;+�� so r� ,e�ao� �nAy ��,�.ow ,-�-� ��oti✓,�� ANALYS)S- "ntZ ANAL`ISI-S F,--, ON -S1'r(�7 LINES "A"7-P+n,0U&0 ('611 WIV- 9F OtlruNtt 145 FbLLOWS; • QUANTPY TrZ- 108cI7--A2Y AA+-A Tb UGH LINI^ 2. pugvn" F(o),J rrt-Ar LraCot4 LI,vE W!V— C4 JrndR ')Tt-7 3. >)CAMINF PIPC7 G9°AUT! FVo, e-Ati! LvVF ¢. p(AMM� CA- PACATIGS OF R-o✓bN &Y2-"C' SYST W��I A60AFt PUWS SB8d1. IN(:. 361: KPrtnry Villa Hoatl. Suity 201. >an Dirl;u, CA 921234858)560-1141 FAX 18581 5(A -8157 9(X)7 Arrow 114MI.P. tiuitP 120. Rancho Cucamon8n. (:A 91730009)948-3450 FAX ('X)91 748 -2750 27715 .4•IhT�ulf AVPIi(Ir. \1114. 2111. PP(1nY'UIM. C4 T25'NI 1'NI' /1 6')a -3a 111 ILAX I'N191 693 - 3:52(1 SB & O PROJECT 9611JSFTTIA tz'06G- SBB &O, INC. AoAR7m EMs I S(ol2Z, z0 ON Sll'5 PrzFCtsFC ,aAiN�, (.iiNF 'A 11 ,Pcn,c Q2Ain/ 7Xf vrAr&- e . rzrA e' i'v vma""(- R.4N,J� /S /3 ,SF / Z60 •�S4S uoo / �d2 1p-20M 412fV 6AUJAI �Ga✓S uend�� Zox 3GV = 6, uct�sF = O. /a AL Tarns A?,P-A = 0.39 (2= G/A = 0.2r) = / 0 C-/'S 0.4x(4. Z)(0,/4) = d. 3c ff -[Dnet / 3 els 1pll'�5r- lJir7J LEAfr SZp�E ON U �4 ' _ / 2 �P vC Z 7 ✓W,4AvA/iA16j 6407-70,,i W /71/ /7 = 6.0 /0 6::�AAXIury FLD DAIS A2.F CAA -k.+" TO A- 4- Gt.FA r,) ovr d fric 6A44t J U 1 eJ 20A D SB&O. INI:. 361 Krarny Villa Ruud. tiuitr 201. San Dwgu, (A92123 (959) 560 -1141 FAX l858)560-9157 9(9)7 Arrow Ilouw, Sulu• 1211, Rancho Cucamonga. (A 71731) 1'9191 949.3450 FAX 1'9)91 949- 2750 27717 IrlTrrsun Avrnw•. tiuilc 2111. '1'rnu•rula.1:A'125'91 I' /1 Ml) 6'13 -3a 111 h.AX 1'9191 643 -a: {211 93 SB Xr O�y PROJECT rV tAJSE7TIA ICI -Ca� - -__ SSBBV &�/O, INC. AoA/tTm -- I s(p12 7.20 ON -Sgr PIP.fGSc- C7►2-A)0[Nc- UNF ff61, jZCbF i32AIA1 Taieur?an -y AvttA (Fq-)M Pwl-I iIw RA<j 234SSF 14s- 7060 7-no lo-74 1x92 1s'9? Io -74 13,972 3F = 0, 3ZAL 51zcm AneA D2A WS �C0Al SEYtVAn *) 100 x ZT= 21 Sva (S Comm. A14A f,SOU G� "Powr1 4,oco SF = 0.0°I Ac- " b,mc Aa-6� -A = 0.41 A �2UN °FF Q =G1A= 0IS- (4'2,xo 1.3 D- s 0,45(4.2)(0.09) = 0. ZC-Ps pIPF W17�4 Lt- ASTSLOPF OAJ (rfNFf1i31t = 12f P.V-C -C-0 ZSO MAN�JW6S 6�)vA7I0•J W1714 n=o -o10 CP-PAUTY Q = co. 6 c-Fr F-uws Akt, cAa4&4c -6 7-a A-4 CLcA^jocrr of-r 6Ac4�7j V1E,J 2oA4 SIM0. INC. 3615 Keamy Villa Road, SUltr 201. S:ul Dingo. (:A 9212318581 5fi(1 -1141 FAX IN581 5W -8157 91X17 Arrow Route, Suit.- 121). Rancho Cucamonga. (:A 91731119091 948 -34511 FAX I'M91 948- 27611 27715.IrITrrsua Avrnm•, Suiu• 2111.'I'rnu•rula. (:A 92:i'N11'NN /1 h9a- '1:1111 PAX I'NM)1 69:1 -aa211 SB &0 PROJECT PotA --Se -r %A 'iA6E SSBB &O, INC. APAAr ccnlTS s ro m 70 ON -St rr- PeEcwsr Gr"411/6- L/Nc �G" 123[ :SF Iz14 (tool- DIrL,o(nl - TyzvSvm2y AacA (F,wM Pt Adt"t. PcarA) vao 21go 142r 1754 1'7% Tbi t_ �� 10� 3S5 O, Z�# Ac p00X10 Fr- PIPrr WrI14 LZAS"r ScoP� o� LiN� "GI' = 8((i 1.4% ez 12"e- 1.0;70 I%% ,j1V,V1,v6j E4)VArIOA) WIT11 4;=0.0I0 CAPAC -fry 8" Q'= 1.9 6-pS 01� C.iQ-PA(A ry I Z ` q-- ¢. & C-ps F&rws AntF c g4t4eb 'N ''g" INLL-r t�..i &24u�T- Ais;-E - 4Mrn0c 7D OrU&lAAA( YZ0`jG" 6r-A`�OKt-> paw (I �4 11 (Std Arr -Awr6 pJAP) SIMO W(:. 321 K.•arny Villa livad, Suite 201, San Diego. (:A 92123 (8581560-11411 FAX 18581 56(I -8157 IXX)7 Arrnw ROMP. tinl(O 120. Rancho Curamnnga. (:A 9173049091948-3450 FAX (9091948-2750 X771 . In111.'u... Avmuu• Cuio• Ml 'I..•nvveda. CA 925911 I( M)1 697 -3310 FAX 1(X)-)1 693 -3320 SB QA O PROJECT POPJSF- T A ol?-4Q6E SB &O, VNC. /V r ^r-4 M ET?S I 5612z. zo 0 N -S 1'i7�7 ft F C7"4 /AJ6- L, vE "6" 1,-70 a S F j'ooF MA 1„J TrzA/3(J7A2y 4-?-c-A �F2�M ftl/M61A,& RAA)s) 1'702 IT4S" 15-04 1-710 10) 331 sF =D. z4 AL It 0 D C-4s Pl Po- Wrnl LCAST SwpE Oj iwF "'pi' = g'� Z%, Gaj0ACarY Q = 2.3 L^4s cle- �taWS A�CMA -2rt� 7D "Q" InJt�r I.J oUE- Als(,E - AQ61 UE � 0r&(,(A1AL 2ovb4 G21 11U&- ,4ybFA `'.LR (SEE A'T- AC"t'td MA-p) 4rIrV h�f IJOB NO I DESIGNED BY SIM0. INC. 3615 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 201. San Diego. (:A 72123 (858) 560 -1141 FAX 18581 560 -8157 'X017 Arrow Ilnute, Suiu, 120. Rancho Cucamonga. (:A 7173711907) 948 -5450 FAX (4)191948 -2750 27715 .Ivffo-"m Avenue. Suite 201. 'I'emeruLt. (A'125911 I'0M 6933311) VAX 1'0W1693 -3320 SB W O PROJECT ROWSt'Ti %A iel& r SB &O, INC. mtr 1 S61zz. zo r=FFE� ON E>clSt?tj& (IZoL,16N GRALE) !TOE MAuJS`1STUyyI Tn.ig(morLy 7th A -¢ Cr -A"ot7F C_ GiOi Oe*/ yre..1 674146F Qrz ow, 6 F cif 605r= / / ,pc G 7 7?7L> 7zCfs �%Lf64vaZ. 2dd6 /J �L�- ,p�iu6i�,�/lOGOGY SvSS�A"il�4it'il ��/� =/TY F�c. i}hS Cet.>rvEt�TJ�✓ � (7 = /0.0 c i7 ✓ 4x Tr-lgtrnva--/ -ro 't6r iVg7 14tSCe -lk S7aKM 6>z,4,,j sysr&-M ThL'L-- FaLLmjw& PAsF VS, Any Am "t 6 EXr-e2-� aF 7'7+f:7 OP�GWAL lLLVSTMAnNG ENE AbbinvNA2Z FLA J E T�+Rr W i u- 8E DZ-L NFCE-6 7D 7i- SYS 1l°rl )9y L i Aj �-S "(," ANh �(nll T�te pA6C rOLLouj tb Tit 4 IS A CAAALgrT , G+W F)n_S A nj E S13&0. ING 3615 Krxrny Villa Road, tiuitr 201, San Diego. (A 72123 1 M58 560 -1141 FAX 185M1 560 -8157 IXXI7 ,lrraw linutr- Suite 120, 1t:mrho Cucamonga. ('.A 91730 1'X)71'149 -3450 PA.X 1'X)71 949-2750 277I5.1effemon Avrnur. �k iiv 200. To- mrrula. lit 925W OXMI1 673 -3310 FAX IW91 693 -33211 l� J SB &O. INC. PROJECT 1611 /SC777A %2/46t7 A014u7)'10' 7-11-oo z,4 iy .S'6/ZZ_ Sc+t�m��c P/Pc7- CAvevr L� tiJi� c 0 ArncAjoc-D Q col 'i0 /A1WAF bN -S 17'- P2Fo c E IA 4? o a 0 n � n Z c a= 0 a J W 2 Q I� �I I w SB&O. INC. 3615 Kearny Villa Road. Suite 201. San Diego. California 92123 (858) 560 -1141 FAX (858) 560 -8157 z. 3. 5. �O 813 OPROJECT (�bItXETTIA SB &O. FNC. A PAo-rM e&is I S61 z z. zo CAPAUTY Of- ffD?AOF AISLE STOn/l baAInJ (P-ou&14 6yL44INb LINE IAti) 111 ��/✓N /NGS '007 =a. O, Pi�F Sw� G�c�ry _�cavr►Z 3'IN4E7- /fzOW 'WA /"v 7.3 c fJ Z¢.¢ � fs ✓ /2 "e d,wF oz "o ya -r 2.9% 7, 9 cfs 3.9 c ri 5.0/T 30.5 c-FS Z3, 3 c-'s v l �''/rJ�i�✓ /0,6/0" 44.9 c-pr 28, 4c fr I' T% Ss/S2--),� h5of erPolou7`f 7a SEnv _ T?�r 2oof 4oU,n,46r- S1S7E»7, SIGNATURE JOB NO DESIGNED BY CHECMFO BY DATE ;fit f I N(l SIM40. IN(.. 3615 Kearny Villa lioad. Suit,- 201. San Diego. (A 72123 18.581 :4A) -1141 FAX 18581560-8157 'NN17 Arrow Houle, Suite 120. Rancho Cuatmunga. (:A 7173(11'X)4)1 948 -3450 FAX VX)4)l 748 -2750 2771f..IrRerwtn Avenue. >uilr 2111. 'Frnurula. CA 92:i'N) 1'NNll 6')a -3a IO 1 {AX I'N )4)I 693 - 3:1211 10) �7� MM v ni .M. ifil ►CSi', •ice•, 1 SB &o SB &O, INC. PROJECT /A✓SE -77 4 Ri4GE XQTS 561z2.Zo �Nc�.vi�S /�7,vc.0 /lP%J. GEC 923 �D/� G1� /G h��6rrn g� ✓Q Svc7� T jl. o go q << 2 9 0` X No. 47677 1n * Exp. 12.31 -03 CNW- 6OF CAl1FOP .TvLy /z, zoco DJZ% <ZEVis" 5epf mRm /.r ZOG Sgt p, /.yc . Z6 /r .Lyl7zvy FST- S6o -114/ Z�11'1 &Z S /zGE 4767 S13&0. IN(: 36115 Kearny Villa Road. Suite 201, San Dwgn. (,diG,ruia 9212119591 560 -1141 FAX 1859) 560 -81.57 sB �o ss &O, INC. •4ize -•o R 8 C E G T K L M N O P Q PROJECT 1'00 lnJJe -M4 A6 &y F 7707� 7= 11- -00 (D.TO) 5-61zz Zo a1C /Fn 1.4141t114L40tr 15'094&c� rRotw - rLo+✓s) ///(�r) 3S9 3 79 Z5(o 048 040 Z35 Z36 ZZ-7 2/S ZZr &94, J? 104,3 Zo 4.3 Zoo 3 Zvq,3 Zo4.3 Zo4.3 co("cr) Z33 73Z ZZ3 S7-3 Z/7 Z/7 Zo 7 Z /4 2o7 70 0- Zo3,7 Za17 203.7 Zo3.1 Zo3. 7 Z403.7 Z03.7 9(IT /z6 147 33 ZS 3/ 7, 8 Z/ 0.6 0,6 0,6 0.0 0.6 0• (o 0, 6 L (;e-j bon P/o Zoo //0 /Zo 3zo ZBo /Fl0 No -7o /Zo 80 150 //0 -ad�r L (// 0. // 0. IS o.o4- o.o 2 6,o3 r o�Zf 0.05 o.o Z 0.03 0.01 0,02 0.02 o,o3 0.02 4(MiN 2.S T 0.S 0.7 0 -S o.s 2.2 Z.2 0.� 2•I 3.3 0.9 Z,I 2.1 3.3 GcSc- A1/W H= l�lT- SBRO, IN(:. 3615 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 201, tiara Diego, Calirnrnin 721231858) 5(A -1141 FAX (8581 560 -8157 77MC SB &0 ss &O, INC. PROJECT ' 8wsc7TJA R146c- A/o,4r7J% e%4r -7-11-oo 14.v) .s612z. zo su►�m,a,►c PrPg�- L,oywr 1� l W y _ Z 07 u �9 kv CSI i � \x i c m � ml � �I J n •Tz a SBM). INC. 3615 Kearny Villa Road. Suite 201. San Diego. California 92123 18581560-1141 FAX 18581 560 -x157 SB &o SB &O, INC. PROJECT f bIAfdCMA de446C- AP'Wr,O" P/l°E C4P4rfOy GAL- eV4.dl7GArs' 7 - / / -av IM-0 5612z- Zo Pvc n = o.oio 6/oa yam) Poop e- Lk$ /("/j jforc G 4AAu7Y 4cri.-At rcow SBR.o. INC. 3615 KCMrnv Villa Road, SUI(P 201. San Diegn. California 9212:4 IHSKI 5(d1 -1141 FAX IR5R) 5(.o -8157 IV 12.3c -Fs C /cam ✓ /3.7 e- -ft 8. / c ✓ Z7- 3c-Fl-------- 23.�Cfl- /� S y jig • SC -Fs Z6.3 c ✓ - c4f ✓ IAI(Ar CAr/�iz+^) '7 '� 2 b. bc-JS 2 -o c �r A7 2921 7.9 c�j z.9 C.- ss ,. /,Vc ;l Car 3 /z' L > l00% - - -- JIA Q. /Gff ✓ 8 "/zcP (polsuG,n = 0.0(1 lo. Syo - -- - - -34 Sc'F5 - -- Z�.4cfS -- 647a'Aci'Fe�ar�/� -Y 6"7-b (Mo) /- /stb/) <6.o c-'s J5. 3 c ✓ 811 / o /.6c� /.SCE ✓ McY E-,A trap)—... _ SIGNATURE JOB NO DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY DATE SHEET NO SBR.o. INC. 3615 KCMrnv Villa Road, SUI(P 201. San Diegn. California 9212:4 IHSKI 5(d1 -1141 FAX IR5R) 5(.o -8157 SB &0 PROJECT RvAlrr-rnA X 14&C 41WYU -MCAIM SB &O, INC. Pa -WATE WtrET �PA�.fTy 9 -IT-oo Z) TD s61az -ao 12 "Xiz" 69A lit w L m P✓LorcisE-o -ra /Aj7v7ic 7*7 FL 71v2E S"erM.tAn-1674j 6ifn 6r r-Lmv- D&A,&M6e I&M-no% eof,atnr„J (2.v*4 - J vc M WIG'(, BE SI2-E6 7a rOAA)Ey 100 YE744- FLOC,/ UL.T)MA rt- Ctln 61-0W - 61t.ATr6 rAjLm Wlac, Scmuc, AS G142AGC DrZA1n1AGC �lVoroPEYJ Ta V'0 wort F2orj Evu. Q= cw P(h )1.9- co = 3.3 P= PEuAtTry^- h : DL-Pn4 ag4f-leE 1FLntj EQu• Q =CA 2F C =0•(90 3.3 P Q z3 L3.3 P 12 °xIz "JAI L L.-r- ASSUME SO #7° GA P =z' /l'IAX Q I NTO OUt Of- Z/ (S�r31R/ztA P 6- 0, Vr� -Q 0,&A{ I 11EAcg 0 r= '7t5 E Ink E-n I s Prc.ovi D b6 Il �tJi71 rUo- PoNDIN& AAA Wlv- I Nr-CEri •�t !bo YE*tL Rom 0L)tj+N6 2ou67N 6fz-A4?n)6p L h= L., AME %z0 t� SSU G00 d.S MAX 4- z. c�S s p, � 2 I OVt�L-V INPUT, nt7S L.00A nW GNP -// A v- o rmw l N STS f+A'J tr EXMA CAAAU i) SBt6O. INf:. 3615 Kearny Villa Road. Suite 2111, San Oie&o. California 92123 18591560-1141 FAX 185H1 UM -81.57 SB 0 PROJECT )901NSE777A R1465- A- W1277-76,,Af SB &O, INC. TYPE ACS A&ET ':-iV1 4 'UTY 9 -�sca D70 S612t•zo z.0 c- S = 0.50% LEAd /aG vP 7D /f, Mrl�b�t�2 TPub /NL� /S /NA ,S1//Y7Po 114 AATA rt -cw-QY /NLET = ° =s= /, 0 h 0.r Q ilx*a G = O. 90 �aP 5U.1.4 fu-4 ',1, Q- 2.9e-lj 6hwlsr /-/0? 6 e- 17 0.s' H o.s' A/ j = /0 2E-J,0a Q/ = o. 90 ~,Ot» TD 7b/° Of ORWM0 i �H= 0s) nn ¢1. �� 6 c�} ✓max By SIMO. INC. 3615 Kearny Villa Road. Suite, 201. San Dingo, California 7212318581 560 -1141 FAX 18591 560 -9157 15 SB &0 PROJECT f 61 I1 St --Mlq R +D 6 F :SAO fLrMendO Sa &O, [NC. D 0 rru4 CARA c4 ry q -IS -w Div 56lzz.zo 2 .o r I -or mommum SLOPE Dln"N "i Rwrer =0 4 Wl,hud ,oc 4n,5,Fev,. 1ov'LEfj6,rA e Gr�-.Y- q Sr,4. 14+Sv (C -M) 5 =0.006 h =o•oIS ` cA► " 7.6 cos *r0-A"R-0f9AS1J(t I3tSlog (p_�.IC(S Faor,i (2) aIR- ucnofNS Row Fmom Soon4 is r a� -�� WITi SLoPf > o.(0% IF 3, oscfs r-,,1-&11, E-6'1*4 err+ --urcj (4/ -) — CAPA.K. IF "CAATU4 r 4&W (?, 1St 813 Q= 1S.a cf� Favoi �70 1) I Arcnows ROW fit t'M A OAA-,4 is, I N 6-7T WITW SLoP6 = 13.790 AAJL c*A,t4cf, -f ?/4 0;F tSaA(nn6L5 AYU-;�7A *10 i� FY2-0 � Sovrlt Y4(19.1)= 3- 8 C � C o. 6 Fju 1'`'I No 2Txi 3�4 IS. 3) = 11.5 c -FS voo K, # (� 7,,Qdv = 36.Zcf) SRRO. INC. 3615 Koarny Villa Road. Suite 201, San Dingo. California 92123 (8581560-11411 I >N( (858) 560 -8157 l'1 EQLIAT /ON C// 9L 31 3BS Fe of Tc N J / ) 5000 Te = Time o/ concenfiaf /on A'f ('j/ 4000 L Lenyfh of watershed �"VlLE'S� H 01110e�elwe /n a /evafion alonq� T) 3000 ellccf/ve s/oae fine (See Appendix Y Bf 7- L c A -flles Feel' _flours M /nu /es 2aoa 1 4 11040 3T /B0 SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL DISTRICT SERVICES Y DESIGN MANUAL APPROVED NOMOGRAPH FOR DETERMINATION OF TIME OF CONCENTRATION (Tc) FOR NATURAL WATERSHEDS CATE /21101- I APPENDIX X -A V -A -10 Rev. S /81 /0 /000 \ 900 BOO 700 /DO 600 \ \ S 90 S00 \ BO 400 \�9 ¢ 70 J / 60 \ SO 200 \ 2 SO \ 4000 20 3000 \ /6 sa 0 s \ /a AD 2000 \ 12 /800 \ 30 NOTE /600 Al — /1000 9 FOR -- a ° — NATURAL WATERStD-DS11 1200 e QFOR l 20 a ADD TEN MINUTES TO /DOO 7 �A COMPUTED TIME OF CON S L� CENTRATION. I 900 BOO 9 = _�� 700 600 S /p SOO ¢ 400 300 3 • 5 200 H L T SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL DISTRICT SERVICES Y DESIGN MANUAL APPROVED NOMOGRAPH FOR DETERMINATION OF TIME OF CONCENTRATION (Tc) FOR NATURAL WATERSHEDS CATE /21101- I APPENDIX X -A V -A -10 Rev. S /81 a z 6 s 4. 3. 2 a o w u L Ga -- v H .6 _ a v - m2 x - �1 J INTENSITY - DURATION DESIGN CHART lj7("rr"R}rrrnrmtrmmmmmrr --. . sttWIIIM Equation: I = 7.44 P6 D`645 I = Intensity (In. /Hr.) krill P 6 Hr. Precipitation (In.) tJ1'i .. D = Duration (Min.) 1' :7: 4T 6 0 w Es c ,.5.0 h4'.0 J. 3.5 s 3.0 N 10 15 20 30 40 50 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 .0 .5 .0 Directions for Application: 1) From precipitation maps determine 6 hr. and 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrolo Manual (10, 51 and 100 yr. maps included in Design and Procedure Manual). 2) Adjust 6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of 4 §.% to. 65% of ti the 24 hr. precipitation. (Not applicable to Desert) 3) Plat 6 hr. precipitation on the right side of the chart. 4) Draw a line through the point parallel to th plotted lines. 5) This line is the intensity- duration curve fo the location being analyzed. Application Form: 0) Selected Frequency /yr. 1) P6 ' 2.7 in. , P242 4• Q *P6 = 67s%* 2} Adjusted *P6= 2 P1n� 6j 3) tc ■ min. 4) III in /hr. *Not Applicable to Desert Region LAr 3303 .V God // 7 '06 'l✓ APPENDIX XI IV -A -14 TABLE 2 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS (RATIONAL METHOD) DEVELOPED AREAS (URBAN) Coefficient, C Soil Group (1) Land Use A B C D Residential: Single Family ,4o .45 .50 55• Multi -Units .45 .50 .60 .70 Mobile homes .45 .50 .55 .65 Rural (lots greater than 1/2 acre) .30 .35 .40 .45 Comme rc i a 1 (2) .70 .15 .80 .85 80% Impervious Industrial(2) 80 85 90 95 90% Impervious V VjC_VeZaPtA 0.45 UScz NOTES: (')Soil Group mans are available at the offices of the Department of Public Works. (2)Where actual conditions deviate significantly from the tabulated impervious- ness values of 80`/, or 90", the values given for coefficient C. may be revised by multiplying 80`/, or 90% by the ratio of actual imperviousness to the tabulated imperviousness. However, in no case shall the final coefficient be less than 0.50. For example: Consider commercial property on D soil group. Actual imperviousness = 50% Tabulated imperviousness = 80`/, Revised C = 8o x 0.85 = 0.53 IV -A -9 APPENDIX IX -8 Rev. S /41 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO OF SANITATION FLOOD DEPARTMENT C FLOOD CONTROL `�y lj !ra •.�`LS'i i '( pd 9 i d — 20 ./ ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 6 -HOUR P ri E C I P H'A 10,i EN ENTHS 6f AN I%T1I —*- 2� T D._0 f`1335� \. A 3 0 I 3Qo\ "5 Ji_ sn E. 35 �i D. J CC '7 r •' 1 C �GQJ C 30' SAN CI h7 CV1E 3 30 V 151 . � X5 �``� I "- 25 25 (tiCONUIDOr (/ U ��.0 ° �, ,_, •1 � \- ,'3rd, ,.t_ #}� '>�� 3 33° I > e-7 3 5'AONA � 20 ^: ?3 °lrcl 4 Il 1� 1 P.rpn ,a sr U.S. DEPARTMEN' 1' OF COMMERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND AT OSPIICRIC ADMINISTRATION SPECIAL STUDIES DRANCII, OFFICE OF it UROLOGY. NATIONAL 4•EATIIER SERVICE $p 3p1 20 J35 3Q 0 H 118' 451 301 151 117° 1151 30' 15' 1160 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PROJECT NAME: POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS JOB NO: 56122.20 S 8 & O, INC. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 560 -1141 (858) 560 -8157 FAX NO. OF LOTS: 1 W.O.: EST. BY DJO DATE: 06-Apr-01 CKD. BY. DATE: 06-Apr-01 POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS - CITY OF ENCINITAS ON -SITE, PRECISE GRADING IMPROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE (PRELIMINARY) DWG. NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT COST AMOUNT BOND PRICE BOND AMOUNT 1 EARTHWORK - IMPORT FOR BERMING 2,480 2,480 CY $8.60 $21,328 2 AC PAVEMENT - 4 " A C / 7" CLII BASE) 31,550 31,550 SF $2.65 $83,608 3 6" TYPE "G" CURB 8 GUTTER 744 744 LF $13.75 $10,230 4 6" TYPE "G" CURB ONLY 1,497 1,497 SF $10.75 $16,093 5 PEDESTRIAN RAMP 2 2 EA $1,050.00 $2,100 6 PCC SIDEWALK 4520 4,520 SF $3.65 $16,498 7 PCC CROSS GUTTER 260 ff IR UO 6 260 SF $5.00 $1,300 ' 8 RETAINING WALLS 4,000 4,000 SF $28.00 $112,000 9 PARKING STRIPING - 3" DOUBLE WHITE 736 736 LF $0.24 $177 10 HANDICAP SIGNAGE 8 STRIPING 2 2 EA $1,000.00 $2,000 11 A -4 CLEANOUT 1 1 EA $3,790.00 $3,790 12 6 "PVC STORM DRAIN 40 40 LF $37.00 $1,480 13 8" PVC STORM DRAIN 682 682 LF $37.00 $25, 234 14 12" PVC STORM DRAIN 883 883 LF $37.00 $32,671 15 STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT 20 20 EA $200.00 16 BROOKS 1212 GRATED INLET 15 15 EA $500.00 17 BROOKS 2424 GRATED INLET 3 3 EA $500.00 $1,500 18 19 P Si v . G if.t ¢ z m 1P Sub Total $341,508 10% Conti $34,151 TOTAL $375,659 TOTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 760/633 -2770 FAX 760/633 -2818 Engineering fit,$ q8 DATE L zcw--> I SEND TO FAX* A3S-A ''-/ /O •0240 NO. OF PAGES: Z TO: -Saco �o55U 4 OF: Gptail�- �fts�Tant� ADDRESS: FROM: "moo �� -►'�� PHONE: (760) 633 - 283`i ❑ Call ASAP ❑ Review & Call ❑ Please Handle Per Our Conversation COMMENTS: ❑ Review & Return ❑ F.Y.I. ❑ Please Reply by l?o�•- �SG�RLD.- �ocs� dQ.��- �tu�tTM't SMR Structural Engineers, Inc. 3569 Fiflh Ave., Ste. 100 San Diego, CA 92103 THE CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. VULCAN AVENUE ENCINITAS CA 92024 -3633 ATTENTION:Tamara O'Neill Date: May 25, 2001 Tc1:619.294 -6600 Fm:619- 294 -6800 Invoice No.: D -01 -084 Proj ID: A2001 -015: Manager: RASHTI Proj Name: POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS Our Tax ID No.: 33- 0914022 INVOICE The following is the invoice for Engineering and Drafting services for the period from May 01, 2001 To May 31, 2001 Date Emp ID Description Memo Hours Rate Amount ENGINEERING: 511/01 RASHTI ENG REVIEW AND ANALYZE PROJECT 6.00 $ 120.00 $720.00 DOCUMENTS Amount Due this invoice: $720.00 Account Summary Last Inv Num Last Inv Amt Last Pay Amt Prev Unpaid Amt Total Amount Due (including this invoice): S 720.(10 This invoice is due and payahle upon receipt. Please make your check payable to SMR Structural Engineers, Inc. Thank you. e:�6illyuick2.01hourly invoice(with acct surunry).rpt Page: I •••••••••• TRANSMISSION RESULT REPORT .................... (JUN 05 '01 03 :13PM) ................. CI1 r ENCINITAS THE FOLLOWING FILE(S) ERASED FILE FILE TYPE OPTION 001 MEMORY TX ........I (AUTO) ..................... TEL NO. PAGE RESULT 918584100260 02102 OK ERRORS 1) HANG UP OR LINE FAIL 2) BUSY 3) NO ANSWER 4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION TRANSMITTAL FORM City of Encinitas FAX 7601633 -2818 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Engineering Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 7601633 -2770 DATE TO FAX* AS--A — &' /G •OZGO NO. OF PAGES: 9- TO: OF: Gvl�eiV di.►�` ADDRESS: FROM: 'r- ore- �rc�7Srt- PHONE: ( 660) 03- I -S! "fL r, n - . - n V.,. E WEERINC SERVICES DEPART. VT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capilol Improvemenl Projects District Support seMCes Feld Operollom Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (RI) Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: " / yn�C— DATE: Regarding (Finance Number TP JMIN/DR: (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE � SCUP I�YPfM rM G' • ' S (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ _ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo• ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TMrrPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ ' ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD(LCWD /G &Efr /CATV) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ qt-- / ^ n �-t(C.� Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan ChangelAs -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: Sec other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage !Water /Sewer/rraiVPark/Facility) Grading Plat, ubmitte 'plan Change/As -built Proposed ❑ C ec ed ❑ Approved ❑ cc • ❑��] Blueline/Red- lined�, Checkprint O Original Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submitt�equiremenll�f Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature O Information ❑ ORIGINATOR:1�^ (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633 - 2600 /FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 IS&ARFUntra rrms docu02 11 99 1 of I E INEERING SER VICES DEPAR T NT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Copilot Improvement Projects Dlstricl Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director (N 1) Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: _�AtP 01 )9Z— DATE: 0 � 1 Ocl /U ( q Regarding (Finance Number -. DEPOSI EE T�P7Mnrf M/MUP/MFN/DR: (Finance Number �DEPOSIT/FEE "(� <. �h1G'kJ5 Vlfl(�yfJ tps (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted at following: Comments /Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ _ Submlmal/Amended/Correcled I) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved p InterofFce Memo" ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TWTPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Tale Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to'-J;� Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: C Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter• ❑ %f?3 Tb - Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: ' ( CD/ CS/ FIRF/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G&Ffr /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments p Agreement re: ❑ Improvements El Pvt. Rd. MMaint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan 31'0 SubmittaVPlan Change/As -Built Proposed El o ected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -line Checkprine Original ❑ Cross Sections 0 Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate (Public /Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage / Water !Sewer /TraiVPark/F'acility) Grading Plan ❑ SubmittaVPlan Change/As -built Proposed ❑ Corected ❑ Approved ❑ cc • ❑ Blue line/Reddined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Requiremen s Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review ❑ Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: (Name) I (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600 /FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG/ARRAntra Trans. doc /02 11 99 1 If I INEERING SERVICES DEPAR i AT S Capitol Improvement Prolects District support services Feld Opeialions Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineerkg INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services C—D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development- Current Planning f Or Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION - San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning Community Services - Parks & Beaches DATE: Regarding (Finance Number (Finance Number (Finance Number Transmitted as following ��C(I DEPOSfI(EiLD DEPOSIT/FEE DEPOSIT/FEE Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ _ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original ! New or Revised Improvement Plain 3 ya- Check 'C re p / Appr ed Copy / Original / New or Revised ^ r l c � G rading Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised II& CA,.rf2t APN: Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff / Consul tant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (PubliclPrivate) (Road/)rainage/W a ter /Se W er/TraiVPmk/Fac i lity) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: (Mass/RougkVNelim inary/Prec ise) (Erosion ControVPlanting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return L.3 1 2 Wkae�S Please call: 2+°>3cl if necessary originator: Tom- 'KJ� Copies to: 'P71 c-(!!:- 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG 1ARRAntcr Trans dnd03 02 99 1 of I JNEERING SERVICES , Copilot ImproVemenl Projects District support Services Field Operotions Subdivision Engineering TroMc Fiwyneeriny INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (C1P) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE)\O ❑ Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services C—D) ❑ Office of the Director (li 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ cam. Please return U-) 1 l.J 2` 1 t2ic� Please call: T Community Development - Current Planning if necessary Originator: :I ni JECf f__ O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: 242� San Dies>_uito Water District - Engineering & Planning Community Services - Parks & Beaches DATE: OI I (39 ( O I Regarding (Finance Number DEPOSrR1 EE (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE Transmitted at following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Improv t Plan _'S I910- vf' Check Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Grading Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised L,I-.'(2-, APN: Other Application: I Q %.fTrrsr�l! (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff / Consultant /CD/Firr/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/W a ter /Sewer/I-rai VPark/Faci li ty) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: (Mass/Rough/Prel im inary/Precise) (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction ❑ Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return U-) 1 l.J 2` 1 t2ic� Please call: if necessary Originator: :I ni JECf f__ Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2918 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 )SGlARRllnlcr Trms.dm /0302.99 1 of 1 S B &0 SB &O, INC. TRANSMITTAL TO: City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 S. Vulcan Encinitas, CA 92024 ATTN: Tamara O'Neill FROM: Daniel J. O'Rourke RE: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments We are transmitting he following via Overnight Mail For Your Review /Approval ❑ ❑ For Your Information ❑ DATE: January 8, 2001 JOB NO: 56122.20 j1 -' JAN 0 9 2001 ENGINEERING SER'JICFS CI7Y OF ENGINI i AS Reviewed as Noted As Requested No of Copies No of Sheets Description Date 2 11 Public Improvement Plans 1 4 Previous (1st) Plan Check Submittal 1 11 Previous (2 n1) Plan Check Submittal 1 1 Revised Bond Estimate (Previous Redline was not returned with Plan Check) COMMENTS: Third plan check submittal. Please call if you have any questions. RECEIVED BY: cc: DATE: LAND PLANNING+CIVIL ENGINEERING+LAND SURVEYING 3615 Keamy Villa Road, Suite 201+San Diego, Cal ifornia +92123+(858) 560 - 1141 +Fax (858) 560 -8157 S B &0 SB &O, INC. TRANSMITTAL TO: City of Encinitas Traffic Engineering 505 S. Vulcan Encinitas, CA 92024 ATTN: Rob Blough FROM: Daniel J. O'Rourke RE: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments We are transmiItt the following via Overnight Mail For Your Review /Approval ❑ ❑ For Your Information ❑ DATE: January 8, 2001 JOB NO: 56122.20 Reviewed as Noted As Requested No. of Copies No of Sheets Description Date 2 11 Public Improvement Plans 2 L-- 11 - Previous (2n°) Plan Check Submittal COMMENTS: Third plan check submittal. Please call if you have any questions. IC1xi1:11Pla III el7i RIN DATE: LAND PLANNING +CIVIL ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING 3615 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 201+San Diego, Califomia +92123 +(858) 560 -1141 +Fax (858) 560 -8157 S B &o SB &O, INC. TRANSMITTAL TO San Dieguito Water District 505 S. Vulcan Encinitas, CA 92024 ATTN: Bill O'Donnell FROM: Daniel J. O'Rourke RE: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments We are transmitting the following via Overnight Mail 14 For Your Review /Approval ❑ ❑ For Your Information ❑ DATE: January 8, 2001 JOB NO: 56122.20 Reviewed as Noted As Requested No of copies No. of Sheets Description Date 2 11 Public Improvement Plans - Sewer Lateral 1 11 Previous Plan Check # 2 1 4 Previous Plan Check # 1 1 1 Previous Estimate 1 1 Revised Cost Estimate COMMENTS: Third plan check submittal. The Legal, Plat and Lien / Covenant will follow under separate cover. Please call if you have any questions. RECEIVED BY: cc: DATE: LAND PLANNING +CIVIL ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING 3615 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 201 +San Diego, Califomia +92123 *(858) 560 - 1141 +Fax (858) 560 -8157 E. ,INEERING SERVICES DEPARTIV, JT TERDEpARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM 1M; Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) th Director( #1) Office of e Capital IMP ,ovemeni Prciects District Supper Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering traffic Engineering Traffic Engineering (TE) Field operations TO_ 0 /� �dr ATTENTION: Af l;ommI Q TPMGF� , • • . G� - �j��U DEPOSIT EE �(J rL ;gardmg (Finance NumbedY >� \ pEPOSI E AP (Finance Number tom, DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number Other Application: (Check) 'ransmitted as following: Check (T�) Final Map ❑ Comments/Additional Space for Document: Final Parcel MaprOved Copy I Original I New or Revised Checkprint I APP 7 heck Improvement Plan New evised Tint I Approved Copy 1 Original Checkp � GradingPlan U I Original / ew or evised Checkprint I Approved Copy ❑ lvlylyour inquUY As Per. Our conversation ❑ Comment For your... i I1ecCian r i1 /n G I�% - L S —� (Staff oC nsultant/CD/Fire /SDWD /OMWDn CWD) Sketch (if needed): Intermediate Description: Plan Change escription: Our Approval ❑ �View Our Inquiry Uses ❑ ^ 3 information ❑ Signature �lJi�„�,' ifnecess Please call: �" , Copies to: Please return 160 633- 2770/FAX (7b0) 633 -28191 TDD (760) 633 -270 Originator: I of 1 � California 92024-3633 TEL ( ) 505 South Vulcan Avcnue, Encinitas, ISG /ARMnter Trans. doc10302.99 Comments Regarding Improvement Plans —1" Plan Check Encinitas Ranch Apartments Community Development Department 8/24 /00 planning Commission Resolution PC 99 -60 — Community Development Department conditions plans for the Encinitas Ranch Apartments include: that relate to the improvement indition: 5 — identifies the approved site plan, etc. P Pons consistent w plan. ,/ 59 parking stalls are provided adjacent to the internal road. o ,/ Improvement plans only show 2 handicapped parking s they are in compliance with handicapped parking. ./ Improvement plans should identify the typical parking stall dimension. re. the stripping of El T To the satisfaction of the Engineering Services SCS — Traffic mitigation r ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) 0 Subdivision Engineering (SE) __ District Support Services (_D) EJ Office of the Director(#1) X'--�SCommunity Development- Current Planning _ O Ftre -Fire Prevention San Diegulto Water District - Engineering & Planning Community Services – Parks & Beaches Regarding (Finance Numb4 174 DEPOSIT EE (Finance Number _� DEPOSI E (Finance Number _) DEPOSITIFEE Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map C1 Final Map ❑ Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised ATTENTION: DATE: Capital Improvement Projec' District SUpport Servicc Feld Operatior Subdivision Engineerin Traffic Engineering. Traffic Engineering (TE) Field Operations (FO) E] —n Other Application: Check I (Type) &VACAtt -XA-t_ t2-QM0JzWe0 To e.o.w. ViLvit LWr PiawiCw Improvement Plain ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised - --------------- Grading Plan - Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / ew or evised (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: (Staff/ Consultant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): 121!57 AV.4t1,4 -3zrsF (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/Trai VPark/Faci lity) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: As Per... For your... Our conversation [I My /your inquiry n �C� Comment Our Review Our Inquiry Our A Approval El �� n Signature Information � Uses Please return L Please call: il� Originator: Copies to: / .l if ecessary 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 rSUARRA nter_Trans. doc/03.02.99 I of I Comments Regarding Grading Plan — I" Plan Check Encinitas Ranch Apartments Community Development Department 8/24/00 Planning Commission Resolution PC 99 -60 — Community Development Department conditions that relate to the improvement plans include: Condition: Compliance: SC5 — identifies the approved site plan, etc. Proposed grading plan does not reflect the approved site plan, as follows: ✓ 52 parking stalls were approved adjacent to the internal road, on surface. This also included landscape pop -outs. ,/ The proposed curb face shown on the grading plan does not match the approved site plan. ✓ No area for parking is shown adjacent to the commercial area. ✓ Need to revise plans to be consistent with site plan relative to parking layout. SCC — requires a min. 4' berm along Via Not shown. Cantebria and Garden View adjacent to Question: Will this be something that is done subterranean parking area. with final grading and landscaping of the site? SCG — Keystone retaining walls to be provided Plans identify keystone retaining wall. Wall along the westerly side of the property. height shown is generally consistent with PC approval. Note: Keystone wall to be planted with vine cover material or equal landscaping. SCT — Mitigation measures: ✓ Interior acoustical analysis. Required prior to issuance of building permits. if Additional off -site acquisition to offset the Provided - .48 acres of credit was purchased. additional indirect biological impacts. ./ Landscaping in graded open space buffer Required in final landscape plan. areas to include a mix of fire resistant native and drought tolerant ornamental species. is"T RESOLUTION NO. PC 99 -60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT, MAJOR USE PERMIT, AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF 120 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AND 3,000 SF COMMERCIAL USES WITHIN A 45' HIGH, 3 STORY STRUCTURE WITH SUBTERRANEAN PARKING, AND ALLOWING A 25% DENSITY BONUS FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FOR THE PROJECT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VIA CANTEBRIA AND GARDEN VIEW ROAD (CASE NO. 98 -295 MUP/DR/CDP) WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Design Review Permit, Major Use Permit, and Coastal Development Permit was filed by Del Mar Heritage to allow the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 120 unit apartment complex and 3,000 square feet of commercial use within a 45' high, 3 story structure with subterranean parking, and allowing a 25% density bonus for low and moderate income housing, in accordance with the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan, and Chapters 23.08 (Design Review), 30.74 (Major Use Permit), 30.16.020C (Density Bonus provisions), and 30.80 (Coastal Development Permits) of the Encinitas Municipal Code, for the property located in the ER- MU 1 (Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan, Mixed Use 1) zone, legally described as: The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of San Diego, and is described as follows: Lot 45 of amended map of City of Encinitas Map No. 13258, City of Encinitas Tract No. 94 -066, Units I, lI and III, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 13333, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June 3, 1996. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing on the application on September 16, 1999, and November 18, 1999, at which time all those desiring to be heard were heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered, without limitation: 1. The September 16, 1999, and November 18, 1999 agenda reports to the Planning Commission with attachments; 2. Memorandum to the Planning Commission, dated November 16, 1999, providing the Parking Analysis for Affordable Units, Via Cantebria Traffic cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9829511/22/1999.doc I Study and Comments from Engineering Services Department, and Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3. Memorandum to the Planning Commission, dated November 18, 1999, providing the Summary of Public Participation Process and Various Meetings. 4. The General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Municipal Code, Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan and associated Land Use Maps; 5. Oral evidence submitted at the hearing; 6. Written evidence submitted at the hearing; 7. Project drawings dated November 12, 1999, as identified in Condition SC5; 8. Design Review Permit/Major Use Permit Site Plan dated November 12, 1999, as identified in Condition SC5; 9. Landscape Plans, dated November 12, 1999, as identified in Condition SC5; 10. Exterior color /material board, dated November 18, 1999, as identified in Condition SC5; 11. 97 -unit Conceptual Site Plan and Parking Allocation Plan, dated November 12, 1999, that demonstrates compliance with all standards as identified in Condition SC5; 12. Typical Architectural Elevation and Landscape Plan, dated November 12, 1999, as identified in Condition SC5; 13. Two colored mounted elevations of the interior courtyard titled "Typical Interior Elevation (Courtyard)" dated November 8, 1999; 14. One colored mounted elevation titled "Typical Architectural Elevation and Landscape Plan" dated October 28, 1999. 15. Model of the project site, proposed site improvements, buildings, and surrounding properties/homes,titled "Encinitas Ranch Apartments." WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings pursuant to Chapter 23.08 (Design Review), Chapter 30.74 (Major Use Permit, which also includes Section 30.16.020C, Density Bonus), and Chapter 30.80 (Coastal Development Permits) of the Encinitas Municipal Code: cd/psm /g/reso /rpc9 8295 1 1/22/1 999.doc 2 (SEE EXHIBIT "A ") NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Encinitas hereby approves application 98 -295 MUP/DR/ /CDP subject to the following conditions: (SEE EXHIBIT "B ") BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission, in its independent judgment, has reviewed the Environmental Initial Study prepared for the project and has determined that with incorporation of the mitigation measures contained therein and made conditions of approval for the application herein, all project impacts will be reduced to levels of insignificance and the Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby adopted in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Crosthwaite, Jacobson, Patton NAYS: Bagg, Birnbaum ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: aot Sandra Hol er Secretary Alice Jacobson Encinitas Planning NOTE: This action is subject to Chapter 1.04 of the Municipal Code, which specifies time limits for legal challenges. cd/ psm /g/resotpc982951112211999.doc 3 EXHIBIT "A" Resolution No. PC99 -60 Case No. 98 -295 MUP/DR/CDP FINDINGS FOR DESIGN REVIEW STANDARD: Section 23.08.072 of the Encinitas Municipal Code provides that an application for a design review permit must be granted unless, based upon the information presented in the application and during the Public Hearing, the authorized agency makes any of the following regulatory conclusions: a. The project design is inconsistent with the General Plan, a Specific Plan, or the provisions of the Municipal Code. Facts: The mixed -use project is located at the southwest comer of Via Cantebria and Garden View Drive within the ER -MU 1 (Mixed -Use) Zone. The triangular shaped project site is vacant and has been rough graded to a relatively flat pad. There is an ascending landscaped bank along the west perimeter and steep upward inland bluff open space preserve beyond. Two story detached single family dwellings are situated across Garden View Road and Via Cantebria to the east and north. The project includes 120 apartment units (22 affordable units and 98 market rate units) and 3,000 square feet of commercial with subterranean parking. The proposed building is 3 stories over subterranean parking, resulting in a maximum building height of 45 feet. A 25% density bonus is proposed to accomplish affordable housing. The subject site is zoned ER -MU1 (Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan, Mixed Use Zoning) which allows for both residential (25 units per acre) and commercial uses. The site has 3.9 net acres. Access to the project is off of Via Cantebria and Garden View Road. The project provides both surface and garage parking. The garage provides parking for 218 vehicles. An additional 52 surface parking spaces are provided for a project total of 270 spaces. Discussion: The Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan encourages a variety in design with differing roof styles and rooflines, architectural projections and recessed areas, breaking up large building masses, avoiding large expanses of walls, creating a sense of interest and diversity, varying the planes of the exterior building walls, use of landscaping to lessen the impact of large buildings, and requiring separate access for residential units in mixed -use projects. (Sections 7.5.2.A & B, and 7.6.1 C) The Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan allows for mixed -use projects within an ER- MUI Zone. The standards tend to focus commercial uses on the first floor with office or residential above or behind. However, office and residential uses are allowed on the first floor. One of the purposes of the mixed -use standards is to ensure compatibility between uses. The location of residential units should have more of a sense of privacy, as opposed to being located on the ground (street) cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9829511122l1999.doc 4 level along a major street. (Sections 3.3.I.A.1, 6.6.2.A, 6.6.2.G.1, 7.6.1.C.1, and 7.6.I.C.2 of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan) The project proposes 3,000 square feet of commercial space on the first floor fronting Via Cantebria for a portion of the building. The remaining portion of the building is devoted to residential units (120 units). The residential units are located above, behind and adjacent to the commercial uses. However, due to the project design and topography, this does not present a conflict between uses. The commercial space has direct, ground (street) level access to Via Cantebria. Although fronting on Via Cantebria and Garden View, ground (street) level access is not available to residential units. The units are located above a subterranean parking structure and take access internally, with pedestrian access at the comer of Via Cantebria and Garden View Road. The parking structure for the residential units is accessed off of Via Cantebria and on -site at the northwest portion of the site. The project provides good separation between commercial and residential uses. This is accomplished by use of the changing topography along Via Cantebria, allowing ground (street) level access for the commercial uses and internal access (which is elevated from the road above parking) for the residential units. All parking that is associated with the commercial use is adjacent and easily accessible from Via Cantebria. The project varies the planes of the exterior building walls in depth. This is also emphasized with the use of three different colors for the walls. The project has a variety of design elements, including: parapet roof, mansard roof, gable roof projections, balconies, railings, window shutters, pot shelves, architectural projections and recessed areas, wood trellis over garage entries, landscaped berm to screen subterranean garage and to lessen the height of the building, open -air walkways on the second and third floor at two locations, and a variety of landscaping, both size and height (15 gal to 24" box trees and 15' to 20' palms). This helps to create a sense of interest and diversity and eliminates long blank walls. The project entrances (both pedestrian and vehicular) are enhanced through the use of additional landscaping and design. The Specific Plan requires 294 parking spaces for the project. The proposed Parking Allocation Plan provides 270 parking stalls. The applicant is requesting credit (22 parking spaces) for the proposed affordable housing units and credit (3 parking spaces) for shared use of the required commercial parking. Section 6.6.2L 1 and 2 of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan allows for a reduction of the parking requirements for those projects designed as affordable housing projects and other projects as appropriate, provided that a parking study is prepared that supports the proposed reduction. The Encinitas Ranch Apartment project proposes an overall parking ratio of 2.25 per unit. This appears to be reasonable due to the project size. In addition, the mixed -use project provides for the opportunity for shared parking. The required cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc98295 1 1/22/1 999.doc 5 parking for the commercial use is 12 parking spaces. The applicant proposes a credit of 3 parking spaces for shared parking between the residential and commercial uses. The peak demand for the commercial parking will generally be during the day when the parking demand for the residential use is low. The Specific Plan authorizes up to 25% of all required parking spaces to be compact parking (8' by 16'). The project proposes 16% or 43 compact parking spaces located within the parking garage. All required parking stalls for noncompact cars shall be 8.5' by 18'. The site plans identify surface parking to be 17' in length. A special condition has been established to insure 18' parking stall length be met. Except for the compact stalls, all parking located in the garage measures 18 +'. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the project design is consistent with the General Plan, the provisions of the Municipal Code and the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan. b. The project design is substantially inconsistent with the Design Review Guidelines. Facts/Discussion: The project varies the planes of the exterior building walls in depth. This is also emphasized with the use of three different colors for the walls. The project has a variety of design elements, including: parapet roof, mansard roof, gable roof projections, balconies, railings, window shutters, pot shelves, architectural projections and recessed areas, wood trellis over garage entries, landscaped berm to screen subterranean garage and to lessen the height of the building, open -air walkways on the second and third floor at two locations, and a variety of landscaping, both size and height (15 gal to 24" box trees and 15' to 20' palms). This helps to create a sense of interest and diversity and eliminates any long blank walls. The project entrances (both pedestrian and vehicular) are enhanced through the use of additional landscaping and design. The Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan encourages natural building materials and color compatible with the colors of adjacent buildings. Roof colors should be limited to subtle colors such as earth tones ... clay colors. (Section 7.5.2.D) The applicant proposes three stucco colors to help differentiate the projections and recessed areas along the street. The stucco colors are natural earth tone colors - beige, light brown and deep brown. A mahogany color is used for the window shutters and black is used for the wrought iron railings. The fascia and trim is an off - white. A concrete barrel tile roof is proposed with off -brown earth tone colors. The Design Review Regulations and Guidelines provide additional guidance. They encourage projects to preserve the natural assets of the site. Materials and color are to be harmonious. Variation of materials should be utilized. Project design to be compatible with adjacent uses in design and scale. Significant views are to be cd/psm /g/reso /rpc98295I l/2211999.doc 6 preserved. Roof equipment is to be screened. A variety of texture, color and size within the landscape plan. (Section 23.08.072 to .077 and Design Guidelines) The project site is currently graded. The project proposes to grade into the existing graded slope located along the west portion of the site and install a retaining wall. This visually is addressed with landscaping, use of a keystone wall, and a special condition established to better screen/soften the walls. The project is consistent in scale to that anticipated within the Specific Plan. Developments to the north and east are 2 story single - family detached homes. The existing streets, along with project landscaping and design help to separate /soften the proposed scale of the project. Project colors are natural earth tones consistent with the surrounding area. Some of the views of the natural open space area to the west of the site will be blocked. Some view blockage was anticipated based on the Specific Plan Land Use Plan, which allowed mixed use development at a 45' building height for this property. However, it is recognized that the Specific Plan preserves the majority of the natural open space as a significant visual resource within the City. No roof mechanical equipment is proposed. Located within each unit will be self contained heating and cooling systems. However, should mechanical equipment be located on the roof, the mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view as noted within the conditions. The Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan (Section 6.6.2.M) requires a combination of trees, shrubbery, vines and groundcovers to be used in the landscaping. Landscaping within the parking areas shall be predominantly trees with one 15- gallon tree for every six parking spaces. The proposed landscape plan either meets or exceeds the required standard. The percent of the site in either landscaping, court yard (including the commercial plaza), or pool deck area is 42 %. The landscape plan also proposes a berm off of Via Cantebria and Garden View Road to help screen the subterranean parking garage. This will also help to soften the building height. (Section 7.5.2.A.2 of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan) The Specific Plan also requires that any fence or wall over 4' in height shall be landscaped with a vine or similar material. Although this provision of the Specific Plan appears to be referring to typical 6' fences and walls, staff has added a special condition requiring the keystone retaining wall(s) located along the westerly edge of the project site be landscaped with vines. This along with the proposed landscape plan with trees /shrubbery and the keystone stone wall design should help to soften the visual impact of the wall, which varies from 2' to 18' in height. The wall terraces when visually close to Via Cantebria. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the project design, as conditioned, is substantially consistent with the Design Review Guidelines and the Design Review Guidelines of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan. cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9829511/22/1999.doc 7 c. The project would adversely affect the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Facts/Discussion: The Via Cantebria Traffic Study considers two alternatives to address project access. The first alternative involves re- striping Via Cantebria to provide a center two -way left -tum median and only one northbound lane. The southbound lane would remain the same as existing, 2 lanes. This alternative would extend from Garden View Road to Via Montoro. The second alternative addresses access only to the proposed project by widening the west side of Via Cantebria adjacent to the project site at the intersection to allow for U -tum movement. Modifications would also be needed to the existing traffic signal at Via Cantebria and Garden View Road intersection. Both alternatives are acceptable from a traffic safety standpoint. The Engineering Services Department noted its support for Alternative 1. As conditioned, Alternative I will be implemented prior to occupancy being granted. The environmental documentation has been completed. Based upon information provided in the Initial Study, along with Comments and Responses to the Notice of Preparation of a Negative Declaration, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. No aspect of the use has been identified which would have any significant adverse affect on the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned, will not adversely affect the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. d. The project would cause the surrounding neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or value. Facts/Discussion: No evidence has been submitted which shows that the proposed development will cause material depreciation to the appearance or value of the surrounding neighborhood. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the project will not cause the surrounding neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or value. cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9 8295 1 1/22/1 999.doc 8 FINDINGS FOR MAJOR USE PERMIT STANDARD: Section 30.74.070B of the Encinitas Municipal Code provides that an application for Use Permit shall be approved unless findings of fact are made based upon the information presented in the application or during the hearings which support one or more of the following conclusions: 1. The location, size, design or operating characteristics of the proposed project will be incompatible with or will adversely affect or will be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residences, buildings, structures or natural resources,with consideration given to, but not limited to: a. The inadequacy of public facilities, services and utilities to serve the proposed project; b. The unsuitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed; and C. The harmful effect, if any, upon environmental quality and natural resources of the City; or Facts/Discussion: The mixed -use project is located at the southwest comer of Via Cantebria and Garden View Drive within the ER -MU1 (Mixed -Use) Zone. The triangular shaped project site is vacant and has been rough graded to a relatively flat pad. There is an ascending landscaped bank along the west perimeter and steep upward inland bluff open space preserve beyond. Two story detached single family dwellings are situated across Garden View Road and Via Cantebria to the east and north. The maximum permitted density authorized for the site is 97 units (25 du's per acre x 3.9 net acres). A density bonus of 25% results in 25 additional units or 122 total units for the site. The project proposes 120 rental units - 98 units to be market rate and 22 units to be affordable units. Of the affordable units, 10 are required to be restricted to Very Low Income to meet State Density Law standards (50% of median income) and 12 are required to be at Low Income (80% of the median income) to help satisfy the ERSP inclusionary housing requirements. Section 3.3.1C10 of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan requires that the development provide a 50' buffer from the existing open space located to the west of the site. The applicant has requested a concession to this standard, which results in an indirect biological impact of 0.24 acres of southern maritime chaparral. The project conditions mitigate this impact through off -site acquisition of habitat at a ratio of 2:1. Since this impact can be mitigated to less than significant through off - site acquisition, the proposed incentive is considered to be protective of coastal resources and consistent with the Local Coastal Program. Off -site acquisition of cd/psm /g/reso /rpc9829511 22/1999.doc 9 land to mitigate impacts associated with indirect impacts is a standard practice and consistent with overall habitat preservation practices. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the location, size and design of the project will be compatible with adjacent uses. 2. The impacts of the proposed project will adversely affect the policies of the Encinitas General Plan or the provisions of this Code; or Facts/Discussion: Section 30.16.020C of the City's Municipal Code authorizes the City to grant a density increase of 25% over the maximum allowable residential density under the applicable zoning and General Plan. In addition, one other concession or incentive is authorized in accordance with State Law (Section 65915 of the Government Code). The Municipal Code requires that a major use permit be submitted to accomplish the granting of a density bonus and a regulatory incentive. Section 30.16.02006 of the Municipal Code allows only one incentive to be authorized in the Coastal Zone. Any incentive granted within the Coastal Zone must be consistent, to the maximum extent feasible and in a manner most protective of coastal resources, with all certified Local Coastal Program policies and standards otherwise applicable to development not subject to Government Code Section 65915. In choosing between incentives, priority shall be given to those incentives most protective of coastal resources so as to avoid any development within or adjacent to wetlands or other environmentally sensitive areas. The maximum permitted density authorized for the site is 97 units (25 du's per acre x 3.9 net acres). A density bonus of 25% results in 25 additional units or 122 total units for the site. The project proposes 120 rental units - 98 units to be market rate and 22 units to be affordable units. Of the affordable units, 10 are required to be restricted to Very Low Income to meet State Density Law standards (50% of median income) and 12 are required to be at Low Income (80% of the median income) to help satisfy the ERSP inclusionary housing requirements. Section 3.3.1C10 of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan requires that the development provide a 50' buffer from the existing open space located to the west of the site. The applicant has requested a concession to this standard, which results in an indirect biological impact of 0.24 acres of southern maritime chaparral. The project conditions mitigate this impact through off -site acquisition of habitat at a ratio of 2:1. Since this impact can be mitigated to less than significant through off - site acquisition, the proposed incentive is considered to be protective of coastal resources and consistent with the Local Coastal Program. Off -site acquisition of land to mitigate impacts associated with indirect impacts is a standard practice and consistent with overall habitat preservation practices. cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9829511122/1999.doc 10 Section 30.16.02005 of the Municipal Code requires a finding that the development, if it had been proposed without the 25% density increase, would have been fully consistent with the policies and development standards of the Local Coastal Program. The applicant is requesting a concession from the 50' biological buffer setback. The applicant has provided a 97 -unit site plan that demonstrates that the 50' biological buffer can be met with a project without the 25% density increase. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the project design is substantially consistent with the General Plan, Zoning Code, Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan and Density Bonus Provisions. 3. The project fails to comply with any other regulations, conditions or policies imposed by this Code. Facts/Discussion: As conditioned, the project will comply with the various regulations and standards imposed by the Municipal Code. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the project design is substantially consistent with all other code provisions. cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc98295 1 122/1 999.doc I I FINDINGS FOR A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT STANDARD: Section 30.80.090 of the Municipal Code provides that the authorized agency must make the following findings of fact, based upon the information presented in the application and during the Public Hearing, in order to approve a coastal development permit: 1. The project is consistent with the certified Local Coastal Program of the City of Encinitas; and 2. The proposed development conforms with Public Resources Code Section 21000 and following (CEQA) in that there are no feasible mitigation measures or feasible alternatives available which would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact that the activity may have on the environment; and 3. For projects involving development between the sea or other body of water and the nearest public road, approval shall include a specific finding that such development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Section 30200 et. seq. of the Coastal Act. Facts: The mixed -use project is located at the southwest comer of Via Cantebria and Garden View Drive within the ER -MU1 (Mixed -Use) Zone. The triangular shaped project site is vacant and has been rough graded to a relatively flat pad. There is an ascending landscaped bank along the west perimeter and steep upward inland bluff open space preserve beyond. Two story detached single family dwellings are situated across Garden View Road and Via Cantebria to the east and north. The project includes 120 apartment units (22 affordable units and 98 market rate units) and 3,000 square feet of commercial with subterranean parking. The proposed building is 3 stories over subterranean parking, resulting in a maximum building height of 45 feet. A 25% density bonus is proposed to accomplish affordable housing. The subject site is zoned ER -MU1 (Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan, Mixed Use Zoning) which allows for both residential (25 units per acre) and commercial uses. The site has 3.9 net acres. Access to the project is off of Via Cantebria and Garden View Road. The project provides both surface and garage parking. The garage provides parking for 218 vehicles. An additional 52 surface parking spaces are provided for a project total of 270 spaces. Discussion: The Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan encourages a variety in design with differing roof styles and rooflines, architectural projections and recessed areas, breaking up large building masses, avoiding large expanses of walls, creating a sense of interest and diversity, varying the planes of the exterior building walls, use of landscaping to lessen the impact of large buildings, and requiring separate access for residential units in mixed -use projects. (Sections 7.5.2.A & B, and 7.6. IQ cd/ psm /g /reso /rpc98295 1 1/22/1 999.doc 12 The Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan allows for mixed -use projects within an ER- MUI Zone. The standards tend to focus commercial uses on the first floor with office or residential above or behind. However, office and residential uses are allowed on the first floor. One of the purposes of the mixed -use standards is to ensure compatibility between uses. The location of residential units should have more of a sense of privacy, as opposed to being located on the ground (street) level along a major street. (Sections 3.3.1.A.1, 6.6.2.A, 6.6.2.G.1, 7.6.I.C.1, and 7.6.1.C.2 of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan) The project proposes 3,000 square feet of commercial space on the first floor fronting Via Cantebria for a portion of the building. The remaining portion of the building is devoted to residential units (120 units). The residential units are located above, behind and adjacent to the commercial uses. However, due to the project design and topography, this does not present a conflict between uses. The commercial space has direct, ground (street) level access to Via Cantebria. Although fronting on Via Cantebria and Garden View, ground (street) level access is not available to residential units. The units are located above a subterranean parking structure and take access internally, with pedestrian access at the comer of Via Cantebria and Garden View Road. The parking structure for the residential units is accessed off of Via Cantebria and on -site at the northwest portion of the site. The project provides good separation between commercial and residential uses. This is accomplished by use of the changing topography along Via Cantebria, allowing ground (street) level access for the commercial uses and internal access (which is elevated from the road above parking) for the residential units. All parking that is associated with the commercial use is adjacent and easily accessible from Via Cantebria. The Specific Plan requires 294 parking spaces for the project. The proposed Parking Allocation Plan provides 270 parking stalls. The applicant is requesting credit (22 parking spaces) for the proposed affordable housing units and credit (3 parking spaces) for shared use of the required commercial parking. Section 6.6.2L 1 and 2 of the Specific Plan allows for a reduction of the parking requirements for those projects designed as affordable housing projects and other projects as appropriate, provided that a parking study is prepared that supports the proposed reduction. The City conducted a parking study of the affordable units within the City. The Study concluded that a 20 to 22 parking stall reduction was appropriate for the 22 affordable units. The Encinitas Ranch Apartment project proposes an overall parking ratio of 2.25 per unit. This appears to be reasonable due to the project size. In addition, the mixed -use project provides for the opportunity for shared parking. The required parking for the commercial use is 12 parking spaces. The applicant proposes a credit of 3 parking spaces for shared parking between the residential and commercial uses. The peak demand for the commercial parking will generally be during the day when the parking demand for the residential use is low. cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9829511/22/1999.doc 13 Section 30.16.02006 of the Municipal Code allows only one incentive to be authorized in the Coastal Zone. Any incentive granted within the Coastal Zone must be consistent, to the maximum extent feasible and in a manner most protective of coastal resources, with all certified Local Coastal Program policies and standards otherwise applicable to development not subject to Government Code Section 65915. In choosing between incentives, priority shall be given to those incentives most protective of coastal resources so as to avoid any development within or adjacent to wetlands or other environmentally sensitive areas. The maximum permitted density authorized for the site is 97 units (25 du's per acre x 3.9 net acres). A density bonus of 25% results in 25 additional units or 122 total units for the site. The project proposes 120 rental units - 98 units to be market rate and 22 units to be affordable units. Of the affordable units, 10 are required to be restricted to Very Low Income to meet State Density Law standards (50% of median income) and 12 are required to be at Low Income (80% of the median income) to help satisfy the ERSP inclusionary housing requirements. Section 3.3.1C10 of the - Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan requires that the development provide a 50' buffer from the existing open space located to the west of the site. The applicant has requested a concession to this standard, which results in an indirect biological impact of 0.24 acres of southern maritime chaparral. The project conditions mitigate this impact through off -site acquisition of habitat at a ratio of 2:1. Since this impact can be mitigated to less than significant through off - site acquisition, the proposed incentive is considered to be protective of coastal resources and consistent with the Local Coastal Program. Off -site acquisition of land to mitigate impacts associated with indirect impacts is a standard practice and consistent with overall habitat preservation practices. Section 30.16.02005 of the Municipal Code requires a finding that the development, if it had been proposed without the 25% density increase, would have been fully consistent with the policies and development standards of the Local Coastal Program. The applicant is requesting a concession from the 50' biological buffer setback. The applicant has provided a 97 -unit site plan that demonstrates that the 50' biological buffer can be met with a project without the 25% density increase. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that 1) the project is consistent with the certified Local Coastal program of the City of Encinitas; 2) that no feasible mitigation measure or alternative is available which would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact that the activity may have on the environment; and 3) Finding No. 3 is not applicable to the project since it is not located between the sea or other body of water and the nearest public road. cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9829511/22/1999.doc 14 EXHIBIT "B" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Resolution No. PC99 -60 Project No.: 98 -295 MUP/DR/CDP Applicant: Del Mar Heritage Location: Southwest comer of Via Cantebria and Garden View Road SCI SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: SC2 This approval will expire on November 18, 2001 at 5:00 pm, two years after the approval of this project, unless the conditions have been met or an extension of time has been approved pursuant to the Municipal Code. SC5 This project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application dated November 18, 1998, and project drawings dated received by the City on November 12, 1999, entitled Encinitas Ranch Apartments Design Review Application (including site plan, conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape plans, parking allocation plan, building floor plans, elevations, illustrative site plan, roof plans, building section, and signage plan) consisting of 27 sheets; 97 Units Conceptual Site Plan and Parking Allocation Plan, consisting of 2 sheets, dated received November 12, 1999; Exterior Color/Material Board, dated November 18, 1999; Typical Architectural Elevation and Landscape Plan, dated received November 12, 1999, consisting of 1 sheet; two colored mounted elevations of the interior courtyard titled "Typical Interior Elevation (Courtyard), dated November 8, 1999; and one colored mounted elevation titled "Typical Architectural Elevation and Landscape Plan," dated October 28, 1999, all designated as approved by the Planning Commission on November 18, 1999, and shall not be altered without express authorization by the Community Development Department. SC7 Encinitas Ranch Community Facilities District No. 1 Under Section "E" of the "Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes for City of Encinitas Community Facilities District No. 1 (Encinitas Ranch Public Improvements) ", the City shall exempt from the Special Tax up to a total of 445.4 acres of Property Owner Association Property and Public Property. The City shall also exempt from the Special Tax up to a total of 75 dwelling units located on up to 3.5 acres of Affordable Housing Property. The City Manager determines tax exempt status and irrevocably assigns tax exemptions in the chronological order in which property is designated Public Property, Property Owner Association Property, or Affordable Housing Property. Property that is designated Public Property or Property Owner Association Property after the 445.4 acre threshold has been met, and property that is designated Affordable Housing Property after the 75 dwelling units or 3.5 acre threshold has been met, may be required to pay off the associated Special Tax. cd/ psm /g/resdrpc9829511/22 /1999.doc 15 Prior to final map approval, the developer shall submit an application to the City Manager for review and assignment of tax exempt status for Public Property, Property Owner Association Property, and Affordable Housing Property within the proposed development. Said application shall include the following information: 1. Acreage associated with public streets. II. Acreage associated with Property Owner Association Property 1. private streets 2. parks 3. other common areas. III. Size of individual lots created by the subdivision map. IV. The square footage of homes or buildings to be constructed on lots. If the square footage is not known at the time of final map approval, then this information shall be submitted to the City Manager prior to issuance of building permits. V. The number of proposed affordable dwelling units and the acreage of the lots upon which said affordable dwellings units are constructed. Community Development Department: SCA Pursuant to Section 6.6.2.L.I and 2 of the Specific Plan, a reduction of 25 parking stalls is authorized. A reduction of 22 parking spaces is authorized for the affordable units, based on the submitted parking study, and a reduction of 3 parking spaces for the commercial use is authorized through a shared parking arrangement with the on -site residential uses. CB Prior to the i¢s!�ance �f h uldin¢ permits- the vacant property (APN: 257 - 510 -01) located at the southeast comer of Via Cantebria and Garden View Road shall receive City approval for a private park and 2 residential units. The 2 units shall be consistent in design with the existing adjacent residential development. Prior to granting occupancy to the 120 -unit apartment complex and the 3,000 square foot commercial use area, the applicant shall either construct the private park or the applicant shall post security in favor of the Mendocino Homeowner Association to guarantee the construction of the park to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. SCC minimum 4 -foot berm with landscaping shall be provided along Via Cantebria 4d Garden View adjacent to the subterranean parking to the satisfaction of the ommunity Development Department. Said berm and landscaping shall screen at least 6 feet of the subterranean parking area from the street. SCD No rooftop mechanical equipment has been approved with this project. Project approval includes the installation of a self contained indoor heating and cooling cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc98295 1 1/22/1999.doc 16 system located in each individual unit, eliminating all roof top mechanical equipment and the need for screening. In the event heating and cooling units are located on the roof, all roof appurtenances including, but not limited to heating and cooling systems and mechanical equipment, shall be shielded and architecturally screened from ground level views from on -site parking areas, adjacent public streets and adjacent properties (public trail system and Mendocino residential area) as approved by Community Development Department and the Planning Commission Subcommittee. (Section 6.6.2.1.1 of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan) All visible rooftop equipment (including roof vents) shall be painted to match the color of the roof as closely as possible. (Section 7.5.2.B.8 & 9 of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan). All rooftop equipment and screening shall not exceed the maximum building height. SCE A minimum of 250 cubic feet of lockable, enclosed storage area per dwelling unit shall be provided within a garage /carport area, or within the main building. (Section 6.6.23 of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan) SCF For residential units, a minimum of ten (10) percent of the floor area of the units shall be provided as private outdoor open space for both ground floor units and units contained wholly on the second/third floor. For units wholly on the second/third floors, this open space may be provided in the form of outdoor decks or balconies. SCG A keystone retaining wall varies in height located along the westerly side of the property, adjacent to the driveway. The wall shall be planted with vine cover material or equal landscaping. (Section 6.6.2.0.2 of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan) CH All regular parking stalls shall have a width of 8.5' and a length of 18' as authorized in the City's Offstreet Parking Manual. SCI The roof tile shall he an integral color concrete barrel the roof as identified on the Typical Architectural Elevation and Landscape Plan, and Color/Material Board. SCJ The interior courtyard elevations shall be revised to be consistent with the front elevation roof design to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department and the Planning Commission Subcommittee. Affordable Housing: SCK As per Section 30.16.020C, a Major Use Permit is approved, granting a 25% density bonus. All of the units exceeding 98 units (maximum permitted by density for this site) shall be restricted as affordable units. cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9829511/22/1999.doc 17 SCL As per Section 30.16.020C, the Planning Commission approves the reduction of the 50' biological buffer as proposed as an incentive for achieving the affordable housing units. The reduced setback is approved as shown on the approved site plan. SCM The project shall comply with the Affordable Housing Compliance Plan prepared for the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan, dated August 14, 1996, or as modified. SCN An Affordable Housing Agreement shall be prepared and executed prior to the issuance of building permits. Said Agreement shall be consistent with the ,t Affordable Housing Compliance Plan and specific project conditions. The a Agreement shall include: total unit count and affordable unit count by unit type, tenure, targeted income level and bedroom count distribution; development interests, roles, responsibilities, contributions and commitments; approved management plan; financing mechanism, including any proposed concessions and/or incentives; covenants assuring permanent affordability of the affordable units; and other items as may be required by the City. SCO The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded as a covenant, which will guarantee affordability in perpetuity, shall run with the land and is binding upon future owners, successors and assigns. As identified in the Affordable Housing Q(r Compliance Plan, the term perpetuity means forever, which refers to the useful a1 life of the structures. The affordability of the units shall be guaranteed for the useful life of the structures or 55 years, whichever is greater. SCP The developer shall execute and record a covenant satisfactory to the Community Development Department reserving 22 units as affordable housing units in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 24.21 of the Encinitas Municipal Code and Affordable Housing Compliance Plan or as modified. Said covenant shall include language that these inclusionary (affordable) housing units shall be reserved XX in perpetuity at rent levels based on the following: 1) 10 units shall be restricted at "very low income" (50 % of the regional median income level) as required for V Density Bonus provisions, and 2) 12 units shall be restricted at "low income" (80% of the regional median income level) for the Affordable Housing Compliance Plan. Income levels and affordable housing payments are established by HUD on an annual basis. SCQ Annual reporting of the affordable units shall be required by the owner, general partner, property manager or other designee. Annual reports shall include tenant incomes, rents, occupancy status and other items as may be required by the City in the Affordable Housing Agreement covenant. SCR The mix of affordable housing within the project is approved as follows: 3 one - bedroom units, 15 two- bedroom units and 4 three- bedroom units. As approved, cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9829511/22/1999.doc 18 the project contains 17 one- bedroom units (14 %), 79 two- bedroom units (66 %) and 24 three- bedroom units (20 %). Any modification to the approved mix of affordable housing units shall require a consistency determination by the Planning Commission. 'ons: The applicant shall re-strip Via Cantebria pursuant to the Draft Via Cantebria Traffic Study, dated November 1, 1999, and to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Department. Said re- stripping of Via Cantebria shall be completed prior to granting occupancy of the project. SCT The following mitigation measures shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director: Interior acoustical analysis to determine acceptable construction materials and design measures to lower interior noise levels to 45 dBA CNEL or below prior to final architectural designs for all street adjacent units with line -of- sightto Garden View Road and/or Via Cantebria. 2. Modifications of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan Final EIR mitigation requirements to offset additional indirect biological impacts (0.24 acres) through increased offsite acquisition of southern maritime chaparral if available or coastal sage scrub at a mitigation ratio of 2:1 to total 0.48 acres. 3. Landscaping in graded open space buffer areas to include a mix of compatible fire resistant native and drought tolerant non - intrusive ornamental species developed in consultation with the Encinitas Fire Department. This mitigation measure shall be completed and incorporated into the final landscape plans and construction documents as appropriate. A certification of completion of the site landscaping shall be submitted by the landscape contractor. San Dietuito Water District: SCU The following San Dieguito Water District conditions apply: 1. The developer shall install a water system according to San Dieguito Water District standards, and dedicate to the District the portion of the water system that is to be public. 2. The developer will be required to enter into a secured agreement with the District prior to project approval. cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9829511/22/1999.doc 19 3. The developer will dedicate to the District all necessary easements for that portion of the water system that is to be public. No trees or permanent structures will be allowed in those easements. 4. The developer will be required to show all existing and proposed water facilitieson improvementor grading plans for District approval. 5. District Ordinance No. 94 -01 states that the use of potable water on landscape areas may be deemed an unreasonable use where reclaimed water is available. Therefore, this project will be required to utilize reclaimed water, where feasible, when it becomes available. The owner is required to install landscape irrigation to reclaimed water standards in those areas that are to be served by reclaimed water. 6. The developer is required to comply with the District's fees, charges, rules and regulations, including installation of any required on -site and off -site facilities. Fire Department: SCV A wet standpipe system and a fire alarm shall be required as part of the fire protection requirements. GI STANDARD CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): G2 This approval may be appealed to the City Council within 15 calendar days from the date of this approval in accordance with Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code. G4 Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall cause a covenant regarding real property to be recorded. Said covenant shall set forth the terms and conditions I of this grant of approval and shall be of a form and content satisfactory to the Community Development Director. G5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Municipal Code, Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan, and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived herein. G7 Prior to issuing a final inspection on framing, the applicant shall provide a survey from a licensed surveyor or a registered civil engineer verifying that the building height is in compliance with the approved plans. cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9829511/22/1999.doc 20 G8 A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as set forth in the Conditions SCR and SCS of this Resolution, shall be established and funded by the developer or property owner. The amount of funds necessary to implement the MMRP will be determined by the Community Development and Engineering Services Departments prior to issuance of any permits for the project. G9 The location of the trash enclosures is within the parking garage area. Trash enclosure(s) shall be constructed of masonry with an exterior compatible with that of the building(s), and shall be provided with view- obstructing solid metal gates as approved by the authorized agency. Adequate space for recyclable materials shall be provided within the enclosure in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Code and the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan (Section 6.6.2.Q). G10 All retaining and other freestanding walls, fences, and enclosures (except the keystone retaining wall as identified in Condition SCG) shall be architecturally designed in a manner similar to, and consistent with, the primary structures (e.g. stucco - coated masonry, split -face block or slump stone). These items shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building and/or grading permits. G11 All roof - mounted equipment and appurtenances, including air conditioners and associated ductwork and conduits, shall be architecturally integrated, and shall be shielded from view and sound buffered to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. Ground - mounted mechanical and electrical equipment shall also be screened through use of a wall, fence, landscaping, berm, or combination thereof to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. All exterior accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary building's exterior to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. G12 Prior to any use of the project site pursuant to this permit, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed or secured to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. G13 The applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, School Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Flood Control Mitigation Fees, Park Mitigation Fees, and Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees. Arrangements to pay these fees shall be made prior to building permit issuance to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Engineering Services Departments. The applicant is advised to contact the Community Development Department regarding Park Mitigation Fees, the Engineering Services Department regarding Flood Control and Traffic Fees, applicable School District(s) regarding School Fees, the Fire Department regarding Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees, and the applicable Utility Departments or Districts regarding Water and/or Sewer Fees. cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9g29511/22/1999.doc 21 G14 A plan shall be submitted for approval by the Community Development Department, the Engineering Services Department, and the Fire Department regarding the security treatment of the site during the construction phase, the on- and off -site circulation and parking of construction workers' vehicles, and any heavy equipment needed for the construction of the project. G15 Parking lot lights shall have a maximum height of eighteen (18) feet from the finished grade of the parking surface, and the light source shall be directed away from all property lines, adjacent streets and residences. G16 Parking lot layout shall meet the standards of the Municipal Code and the Off Street Parking Design Manual. G17 In accordance with the provisions of the Off - Street Parking Design Manual, all parking spaces (except handicapped spaces) shall be delineated by double -line striping consisting of 4 -inch wide painted white lines 1 to 2 feet apart, and all parking areas with more than one row of parking spaces shall have directional signs or painted directional arrows where one way travel is necessary to guide traffic, all of which shall be indicated in building plans and found satisfactory by the Community Development Department prior to final approval of the project's building permit. Adjacent to the sides of the parking lot landscape islands, stalls shall be provided with a 12" wide concrete strip adjacent to the island's curb. G18 Parking area shall be screened from adjacent properties and/or public view with decorative wall(s) and/or landscaping. Said screening shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department prior to building permit issuance. G20 Decorative use of neon tubing or banding, such as tubing around windows or doors or banding around the building exterior, shall not be allowed unless approved through subsequent design review permit modification(s). Temporary window signs are limited to 25% of window area in accordance with Section 30.60.060 (l) of the Municipal Code. Landscaping L1 The project is subject to Chapter 23.26 of the Municipal Code (Water Efficient Landscape Program), which requires a landscape and irrigation plan to be prepared by a State licensed landscape designer. The requirements for the plans are listed in Chapter 23.26. The landscape and irrigation plans must be submitted as part of the building permit application for the project. L2 All required plantings and automated irrigation systems shall be in place prior to use or occupancy of new buildings or structures. All required plantings and automated irrigation systems shall be maintained in good condition, and whenever necessary, cd/psm /g/reso /rpc982951 I/22 /1999.doc 22 shall be replaced with new materials to ensure continued compliance with applicable landscaping, buffering, and screening requirements. All landscaping and irrigation systems shall be maintained in a manner that will not depreciate adjacent property values and otherwise adversely affect adjacent properties. All irrigation lines shall be installed and maintained underground (except drip irrigation systems). All parking areas and driveways shall conform with Chapter 30.54 of the Municipal Code and the City's Offstreet Parking and Design Manual incorporated by reference therein. 1-4(a) All landscaping, fences, walls, etc. on the site, in any adjoining public parkways (the area between the property line and the street) shall be permanently maintained by the owner, assigns or any successors in interest in the property. The maintenance program shall include normal care and irrigation of the landscaping; repair and replacement of plant materials and irrigation systems as necessary; and general cleanup of the landscaped and open areas, parking lots and walkways, walls, fences, etc. Failure to maintain landscaping and the site in general may result in the setting of a public hearing to revoke or modify the approval. This condition shall be recorded with the covenant required by this Resolution. Siens: S1 Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed and approved in conformance with Encinitas Municipal Code Chapter 30.60. S2 A comprehensive Sign Program for this development to include temporary subdivision advertising signs and any model home and information signing shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Use Permits: U At all times during the effective period of this permit, the responsible party shall obtain and maintain in valid force and effect, each and every license and permit required by a governmental agency for the operation of the authorized activity. U2 In the event that any of the conditions of this permit are not satisfied, the Community Development Department shall cause a noticed hearing to be set before the authorized agency to determine whether the City of Encinitas should revoke this permit. U3 Upon a showing of compelling public necessity demonstrated at a noticed hearing, the City of Encinitas, acting through the authorized agency, may add, amend, or delete conditions and regulations contained in this permit. cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9829511/22/1999.doc 23 U4 Nothing in this permit shall relieve the applicant from complying with conditions and regulations generally imposed upon activities similar in nature to the activity authorized by this permit. U5 Nothing in this permit shall authorize the applicant to intensify the authorized activity beyond that which is specifically described in this permit. U7 Any future modifications to the approved project will be reviewed relative to the findings for substantial conformance with a use permit contained in Section 30.74.105 of the Municipal Code. Modifications beyond the scope described therein will require submittal and approval of an amendment to the use permit by the authorized agency. U8 All project grading shall conform with that shown on the approved project plans. If no grading is proposed on the approved plans, or subsequent grading plans are inconsistent with the grading shown on the approved plans, a use permit modification for such grading shall be obtained from the authorized agency of the City prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Design Review DRl Any future modifications to the approved project will be reviewed relative to the findings for substantial conformance with a design review permit contained in Section 23.08.140 of the Municipal Code. Modifications beyond the scope described therein may require submittal and approval of an amendment of the design review permit by the authorized agency. DR2 Side and rear elevations and window treatments shall be trimmed and architecturally treated so as to substantially match the front elevations. This treatment shall be reflected in building plans and shall be found satisfactory by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits. DR3 All project grading shall conform with the approved plans. if no grading is proposed on the approved plans, or subsequent grading plans are inconsistent with the grading shown on the approved plans, a design review permit for such grading shall be obtained from the authorized agency of the City prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Housing: HI Projects involving a subdivision or development proposal involving 20 or more residential units shall be required to provide an Affordable Fair Housing Marketing Plan, or provide evidence that the developer/builder is a Voluntary Affirmative Marketing Agreement (VAMA) signatory and has paid the required per unit fee for VAMA administration. The Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan/evidence of cd/psm/g/reso /rpc982951 122/1999.doc 24 being a VAMA signatory must be found satisfactory by the Community Development Department prior to approval of a Final Map, Final Parcel Map, or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. BI BUILDING CONDITION(S): CONTACT THE ENCINITAS BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): B2 The applicant shall submit a complete set of construction plans to the Building Division for plancheck processing. The submittal shall include a Soils/Geotechnical Report, structural calculations, and State Energy compliance documentation (Title 24). Construction plans shall include a site plan, a foundation plan, floor and roof framing plans, floor plan(s), section details, exterior elevations, and materials specifications. Submitted plans must show compliance with the latest adopted editions of the California Building Code (The Uniform Building Code with California Amendments, the California Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Codes). Commercial and Multi - residential construction must also contain details and notes to show compliance with State disabled accessibility mandates. These comments are preliminary only. A comprehensive plancheck will be completed prior to permit issuance and additional technical code requirements may be identified and changes to the originally submitted plans may be required. F1 FIRE CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): F2 ACCESS ROADWAY DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roadways shall have an unobstructed paved width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. EXCEPTION: Access to one (1) single family residence shall not be less than 16 feet of paved width. F8 COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS: Prior to the delivery of combustible materials on the project site, water and sewer systems shall satisfactorily pass all required tests and be connected to the public water and sewer systems. In addition, the first lift of asphalt paving shall be in place to provide a permanent all- weather surface for emergency vehicles. Said access shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. F9 POSTING OF ROADWAYS: Emergency access roadways when required shall be properly identified as per Fire Department standards. FIO OBSTRUCTIONS (ACCESS ROADWAYS): All traffic lanes shall be a minimum of 24 feet in width during construction and shall be maintained clear cd/ psm /g/reWrpc9g29511/2211999.doc 25 and free of obstructions during construction in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. F11 FIRE HYDRANTS & FIRE FLOWS: The applicant shall provide fire hydrants of a type, number, and location satisfactory to the Encinitas Fire Department. A letter from the water agency serving the area shall be provided that states the required fire flow is available. Fire hydrants shall be of a bronze type. A two- sided blue reflective road marker shall be installed on the road surface to indicate 1 the location of the fire hydrant for approaching fire apparatus. F13 ADDRESS NUMBERS: Address numbers shall be placed in a location that will allow them to be clearly visible from the street fronting the structure. The height of the address numbers shall conform to Fire Department Standards. F15 AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM: Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. E1 ENGINEERING CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): E2 All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of building /grading permit issuance shall apply. EGI GradineConditions: EG3 The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. EG4 'The grading for this project is defined in Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to the Engineering Services Director and verify compliance with Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. EG5 -'No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. EG6 'A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate grading permit issued for the borrow or disposal site if located within the city limits. EG7 All newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1. cd/psm /g/reso /rpc9829511/22/1999.doc 26 EG8 ✓Q soils /geological/hydraulicreport (as applicable) shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Such report shall be submitted and approved at first submittal of a grading plan. EG9 ' Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the Engineering Services Director for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the Engineering Services Director may impose with regards to the hauling operation. EG I eln accordance with Section 23.24.370 (A) of the Municipal Code, no grading permit shall be issued for work occurring between October Ist of any year and April 15th of the following year, unless the plans for such work include details of protective measures, including desilting basins or other temporary drainage or control measures, or both, as may be deemed necessary by the field inspector to protect the adjoining public and private property from damage by erosion, flooding, or the deposition of mud or debris which may originate from the site or result from such grading operations. ED1 DrainaeeConditions: ED2 The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and shall construct temporary desiltation/detention basins of type, size and location as approved by the Engineering Services Director. The basins and erosion control measures shall be shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or approved by the Engineering Services Director. The developer shall maintain the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a period of time satisfactory to the Engineering Services Director and shall guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the Engineering Services Director. ED3 A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water originating within the subdivision, and all surface waters that may flow onto the subdivision from adjacent lands, shall be required. Said drainage system shall include any easements and structures as required by the Engineering Services Director to properly handle the drainage. ED5 The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the final map for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc98295 1 1/22/1 999.doc 27 the Master Drainage Plan and City of Encinitas Standards as required by the Engineering Services Director. ED7 Concentrated flows across driveways and/or sidewalks shall not be permitted. ES l Street Conditions: ES5 Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, a right -of -way construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Director and appropriate fees paid, in addition to any other permits required. EU1 Utilities: EU2 The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective utility agencies regarding services to the project. EU3 The developer shall be responsible for coordinatim with S.D.G. & E., Pacific Telephone, and other applicable authorities. EU4 All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including existing utilities unless exempt by the Municipal Code. EU5 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation and undergroundingof existing public utilities, as required. If private sewer will serve this development, then a maintenance agreement must be executed before recordation of the Final Map. —7 EU7 The design of the division of land shall provide each cable operator an opportunity to construct, install and maintain, on land identified on the map as dedicated to public utility use, any equipment necessary to extend cable television services to each residential parcel in the subdivision. This conditions shall not apply to the conversion of existing dwelling units to condominiums, community apartments, or stock cooperatives. EU8 Subject to all applicable Federal and State laws, statutes and regulations, in the event of multiple cable communication operators desiring to serve new residential developments in which the electric power and telephone utilities are underground, the following procedure shall apply with respect to access to and utilization of underground easements: (a) The developer shall be responsible for contacting and surveying all franchised cable operators to ascertain which operators desire to provide cable television service to the development. The developer may establish a reasonable deadline to receive responses from cable operators. The final cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9829511/22/1999.doc 28 tract map shall indicate the cable operator(s) that have agreed to serve the development. (b) If one or more cable operators wish to provide service, they shall be accommodated in the joint utilities trench on a nondiscriminatory shared basis. (c) The developer shall provide at least (10) working days notice of the date that the utility trenches will be open to the cable operators that have agreed to serve the development. (d) Sharing the joint utilities trench shall be subject to compliance with Public Utilities Commission and utility standards. If such compliance is not possible, or if three (3) or more operators desire to provide service to the development, the developer shall provide a separate trench for the cable television cables, with the entire cost shared among the participating cable operators. With the concurrence of the developer, the affected utilities and the cable television operators, alternative installation procedures, such as the use of deeper trenches, may be utilized, subject to the applicable law. (e) Any cable operator wishing to serve an area where the trenches have been closed shall be responsible for separate trenching and associated costs; provided that if the cable operator was not provided timely written notice of the availability of such trenches, the developer shall reimburse the operator for such costs. cd/ psm /g/reso /rpc9 8 295 1 1/22/1 999.doc 29 09/20/2000 11:49 61yL314�4i k facsimile ftm mival FIRS1 AMERICAN SUED PAGE 01 First American Title- SD 411 Ivy Street San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: (619) 231 -4656 To: Dan O'Rourke Fax: (858) 560 -8157 From: Cathy Clark Date: 09 /20 /00 Re: Encinitas Ranch Apts. Pages: 9 CC: ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please ❑ Please ❑ Please Comment Reply Recycle Notes: Dan: Attached is a copy of the Preliminary Report for Encinitas Ranch Apartments, LLC, per your request. Should you have any questions or need anything further, please do not hesitate to call me. N yo athy ar , l C!1 . I P 0 yr, SERVICES ENr,Ha �1;4, _ 09/20/2000 11:4U b1y2314b4i h1k5i AMERICAN SUED PAGE 02 ORDER NO. 1250988-15 � y a, -1 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 411 IVY STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 P.O. BOX 808, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92112 (619) 238 -1776 SEPTEMBER 20, 2000 CITY NATIONAL BAND 9701 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD #600 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ATTENTION: SUSIE BARLAN OUR ORDER NO. 1250988 -15 IN RESPONSE TO THE HEREIN REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, THIS COMPANY HEREBY REPORTS THAT IT IS PREPARED TO ISSUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, A POLICY OR POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE DESCRIBING THE LAND AND THE ESTATE OR INTEREST THEREIN HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, INSURING AGAINST LOSS WHICH MAY BE SUSTAINED BY REASON OF ANY DEFECT, LIEN OR ENCUMBRANCE NOT SHOWN OR REFERRED TO AS AN EXCEPTION HEREIN OR NOT EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORMS. THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FROM THE COVERAGE OF SAID POLICY OR POLICIES ARE SET FORTH HEREIN. COPIES OF THE POLICY FORMS SHOULD BE READ. THEY ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS REPORT. PLEASE READ THE EXCEPTIONS SHOM'N OR REFERRED TO BELOW AND THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS REPORT CAREFULLY. THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS ARE MEANT TO PROVIDE YOU WITH NOTICE OF MATTERS WHICH ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY AND SHOULD BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THIS PRELIMINARY REPORT IS NOT A WRITTEN REPRESENTATION AS TO THE CONDITION OF TITLE AND MAY NOT LIST ALL LIENS, DEFECTS, AND ENCUMBRANCES AFFECTING TITLE TO THE LAND. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. DATED AS OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2000 AT 7 :30 A.M (Z49(1244 CATHY YARK - TITLE OFFICER DIRECT IAL PHONE 231 -6656 FAX NO. 231 -4647 PAGE UW2d /2tlbn 11:4b 5I AMP, RI l .y. blyJ :Jl4b4i h1Kbl AMtKll.:iN SUbU H96L 0 ORDER NO. 1250988-15 THE FORM OF POLICY TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REPORT IS: LP -10 TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: FEE THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTION'S TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2000 -2001, A LIEN, NOT YET PAYABLE. SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. PARCEL NO. 899 - 635- 87 -49. ORIGINAL 1ST INSTALLMENT $3,076.58 PAID ORIGINAL 2ND INSTALLMENT $3,076.58 OPEN (DELINQUENT ON 10/31/2000) DELINQUENCY CHARGES: $317.66 2ND PENALTY NOTE: NO DETERMINATION IS MADE AS TO THE ASSESSED TAX YEAR. 3. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTES OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES: THE REQUIREMENT THAT THIS COMPANY BE FURNISHED WITH ALL SUPPLEMENTAL TAX BILLS. IF ANY, FROM THE OWNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEFORE CLOSE OF ESCROW. PAGE 09/20/2000 11:4b b1y2314647 FIRST AMERICAN SUED RAGE 04 ` e ORDER NO. 1250988-15 4. AN EASEMENT FOR EXISTING IRRIGATION PIPE LINES AND ELECTRIC POWER LINES; THE RIGHT, PRIVILEGE AND EASEMENT OF ERECTING, MAINTAINING OR CAUSING TO BE ERECTED AND MAINTAINED UPON THE LAND HEREBY CONVEYED, TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE POLE LINES WITH THEIR USUAL EQUIPMENT; ELECTRIC POWER AND LIGHT POLE LINES AND THEIR USUAL EQUIPMENT AND OF OPERATING THE SAME; AND A RIGHT -OF -NAY OVER SAID LAND TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN NECESSARY IRRIGATION PIPE LINES AND DITCHES FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF WATER OVER SAID LA COSTA ACRES AND TO OPERATE THE SAME, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON SAID LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, REPAIRING AND REPLACING OR IMPROVING ANY OF SAID WORKS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF LA COSTA ACRES CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1929 IN BOOK 1660, PAGE 476 OF DEEDS. THE ROUTE OR LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM SAID INSTRUMENT. AN EASEMENT FOR IRRIGATION PIPELINES AND ELECTRIC POWER LINES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF LA COSTA ACRES CORPORATION, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1929 IN BOOK 1688, PAGE 2 OF DEEDS. THE ROUTE OR LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM SAID INSTRUMENT. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE SAN DIEGUITO REORGANIZATION PROJECT AREA AS DISCLOSED BY SAN DIEGO COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86.390249 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. DEED RESTRICTION DATED OCTOBER 26, 1988 EXECUTED BY PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PAUL JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, PAUL ECKE III, PAUL ECKE SR., TRUSTEE OF THE PAUL ECKE SR. TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1983 AND THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SUBJECTED TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1989 AS FILE NO. 89- 082586 OF OFFICIAI. RECORDS. 8. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT #94 -3 OF THE SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994 - 0488541 AND NOVEMBER 16, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0521630 BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 94.3 OF THE SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 AS FILE NO 1996 - 0482254 UPHOLD OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 09/20/2000 11:40 6192314647 FIRST AMERICAN SUBD PAGE 05 PY ANF, R'cl 1 ORDER NO. 1250988 -I5 9. A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1994, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; PAUL ECKE, JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983; NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; R.E.L.S., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; CHARLES S. CARTER AND RUTH DRAPER CARTER, BOTH AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER THE DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2,1982; RAYMOND A. NVHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID N. WHTTWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; CRAIG P. WHIINVER, AN INDIVIDUAL AND GENEEN L- WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL. RECORDED: DECEMBER 14, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994- 0713677 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRU.Vf -NT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. AN ASSIGNMENT OF CITY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FROM CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO ENCINITAS TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES. LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY DATED DECEMBER 5, 1995 AND RECORDED DECEMBER 8, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0559945 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN ASSIGNMENT OF CITY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FROM CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO EXCHANGE RESOURCES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION RECORDED JANUARY 31, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000 - 0050162 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN ASSIGNMENT OF CITY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FROM EXCHANGE RESOURCES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION TO ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED JANUARY 31, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000-0050163 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A MEMORANDUM OF ALLOCATION AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 1, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: PAGE NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, R.E -L.S.. INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PAUL ECKE RANCH. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PAUL ECKE, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1953. ELISABETH K. ECKE. 09/20/2000 11:40 s'( n ni F. 4 , CN 4 6192314647 FIRST AMERICAN SUBD PAGE 06 ORDER NO. 1250988-15 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983 P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LR-MD PARTNERSHIP, RAYMOND A. WHITWER, GENEEN L. WHITWER, DAVID N. WHITWER, CRAIG P. WHITWER, CHARLES S. CARTER, CO- TRUSTEE UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982, RUTH DRAPER CARTER, CO- TRUSTEE UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED .TUNE 2, 1982 AND ENCINITAS TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS A SUCCESSOR TO CARLTAS COMPANY. DECEMBER 11, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0561223 OF OFFICL4L RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 10, AN AGREEMENT FOR ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND FOR PROVISION OF SEWER SERVICE THERETO, DATED APRIL 24, 1995. UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, A COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; PAUL ECKE, JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983; NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA L]lIITED LIABILITY COMPANY; CHARLES S. CARTER AND RUTH DRAPER CARTER, AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982; RAYMOND A. WHITR'ER, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID N. WHITWER AN IN'DrVIDUAL; CRAIG P. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND GENEEN L. WHITWER. AN INDIVIDUAL. RECORDED: MAY 30. 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0225327 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. THE ANNEXATION FEES FOR THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY WHICH ARE REQUIRED BY THE ABOVE REFERENCED DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. PAGE 09/20/2000 11:40 iii•( AM ER/�. -/ •A sac 6192314647 11. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -39 OF THE CI CALIFORNIA ORDERING TERRITOR Y ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS 1995- 0254447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, FIRST AMERICAN SUD PAGE 07 ORDER NO. 1250988 -15 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, DESIGNATED AS ENCINITAS RANCH WAS RECORDED JUNE 16, 1995 AS FILE NO. 12. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE ENCINITAS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. T ( ENCINITAS RANCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 14, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0299308 AND AUGUST 25, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0377363, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 13. A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. l ( ENCINITAS RANCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), WAS RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0377298 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0489781 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN AMENDED AND RESTATED NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN, RECORDED MAY 27, 1997 AS FILE NO. 1997 - 0244675 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 14. AN EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC FACILITIES, OVERHEAD AND /OR UNDERGROUND AND APPURTENANCES FOR THE TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRICITY, COMMUNICATION FACILITIES, OVERHEAD AND /OR UNDERGROUND AND APPURTENANCES, PIPELINES AND APPURTENANCES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, RECORDED MAY 13, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996-0241944 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN LOT 45 AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 13333. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS 15. AN AGREEMENT REGARDING IMPROVEMENT OF SUBDIVISION SEWERS, DATED DECEMBER 14, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY. RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996 - 0456801 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 16. THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY RESTRICTING BUILDING PERMITS RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 1999 AS FILE NO. 1999 - 0763749 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 17. THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN GRANT DEED RECORDED JANUARY 31, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000 - 0050161 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. PAGE 09/20/2000 11:40 6192314647 FIRST AMERICAN SUBD PAGE 06 ORDER NO. 1250988 -15 18. A RIGHT TO REPURCHASE IN FAVOR OF CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AS DISCLOSED BY GRANT DEED RECORDED JANUARY 31, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000 - 0050161 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 19. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL SUM OF $2,530,596.55, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS OR OBLIGATIONS SECURED THEREBY, RECORDED JANUARY 31, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000 - 0050384 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: JANUARY 31, 2000 TRUSTOR: ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TRUSTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: ENCINITAS RANCH LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 20. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, THE COMPANY WILL REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING Mi= RESPECT TO ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY: 1. A COPY OF ITS OPERATING AGREEMENT AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE COMPANY FOR REVIEW. 2. A CERTIFIED COPY OF ITS ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION (LLC -1), ANY CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION (LLC -11), CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT (LLC -2), OR RESTATEMENT OF ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION (LLC -10), MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE COMPANY FOR REVIEW. 1999 -2000 TAX INFORMATION: CODE AREA: PARCEL NO.: 1ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS; EXEMPT: 19412 257- 040 -46 -00 $7,323.03 PAID $7,323.03 PAID 51,363,805.00 S -0- 5-0- PAGE VW20 /201717 11:40 bl`J2:J14b4! t1Nbl 41tN1GAN bUbJ tAht 0y A M p N �. ORDER NO. 1250988-15 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 45 OF AMENDED MAP OF CITY OF ENCINITAS MAP NO. 13258, CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 94 -066, UNITS I, R AND III, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 13333, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 3, 1996. SEPTEMBER 20, 2000 11:25 ANf OM PAGES 4 y q A Ni E ='r r 1 6 Louk d3s ORDER NO. 1250988 -15 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 411 IVY STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 P.O. BOX 808, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA (619) 238 -1776 ' SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 M� SB &. O 3615 KEARNY VILLA ROAD, SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA ATTENTION: DAN O'ROURKE �r �S 1 D 1 use J ' EN" ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND THE FOLLOWING ITEMS FOR YOUR USE: COPIES OF ITEMS 6 AND 13 FOR ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS, MY NEW ORDER NO. 1250988 -15. THEY WERE TOO LONG TO FAX. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT THE UNDERSIGNED SINCERELY, CATHY ARK - TITLE OFFICER DIRECT IAL PHONE 231 -4656 FAX NO. 231 -4647 Form No. 1068 -1 (Rev. 10/17192) Exhibit A to Preliminary Report S AM E R I �3Z Preliminary Report � JUL 12 , M j1 CITY OFEIVCr lr'n First American Title Insurance Company EXHIBIT A LIST l TINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS , .'Olicy Type) 1. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY • 1990 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, Or notice of such proceedings, whether a rol shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights. interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements. liens or encumbrances. or claims thereof, which are rol shown by Ibe public records. 4. Discrepancies. eoofficts in bou" lines, shortage in area. encroachments. or any other lacts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are rml shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpalemeo mining claims. (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. (c) valet rights, claims Or title 10 water, whethe' or not the makers excepted under (a). (b). or (c) are shown by the public records. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss Or damage, costs, afforneys lees or expenses which arise by reason of I. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land, (ii) the characler, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the Land is or was a part; or (w) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws. ordinances a governmental regulations. except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a deject. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power hot excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of me exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance faulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy, but nor excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a pachaser lot value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens. encumbrances, adverse claims. or other matlers- (a) whether or not recorded in the public records al Dale of Policy, but created. suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured claimant. (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but (mown to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date Me insured claimant became an insured under this policy, (c) resullirp in no loss or carnage in the insured claimant. (d) attaching or created subsequent to Dale of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained it the insured claimant had paid value lot the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceabilily, of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or lailure of the insured at Dale of Policy, or the inability or lailure of any subsequent owner of the indebledress, to complywith the applicable 'doing business' laws of the stale in which the (and is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenfarceabibty of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury on any consumer credit pmleclion or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim. which arises out of the Iransaction vesting in the insured the estate or intent insured by their policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation ul lederal bankruptcy, stale Insolvency or similar creditors rips laws. 2. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B - 1970 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation ( including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or reguating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, orregulaling the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions of area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance of governmental regulation. 2. Rights or eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created. suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant. 0) not known 10 the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured cla,manl either at Date of Policy a at the dale such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy and not disclosed in writing by the insured claim to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured here utcha. (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant. (o) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy. or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not fare been sustained if the insured claimant Pad paid value for the estate or interest insured by this polity. 3. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B • 1970 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set loch in paragraph 2 above are used and the following excelphom; to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the matters shown in parts one and two following: Part One 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown try the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies. conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are rot shown by public records. 5. UrpMented mining claims, resermations or exceptions in palents or in Acts authorizing the issuance Ihemot. water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien. IN services, labs or material heretofore a hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by Me public records. Form. No. 1 342 11 98 2) ALTA Plain Language Commitment S� A M E R . � CA First American Title Insurance Company INFORMATION The Title Insurance Commitment is a legal contract between you and the company. It is issued to show the basis on which we will issue a Title Insurance Policy to'you. The Policy will insure you against certain risks to the land title, subject to the limitations shown in the Policy. The Company will give you a sample of the Policy form, if you ask- The Commitment is based on the land title as of the Commitment Date. Any changes in the land title or the transaction may affect the Commitment and the Policy. The Commitment is subject to its Requirements, Exceptions and Conditions. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PART OF THE TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page AGREEMENT TO ISSUE POLICY 1 SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment Date 2 2. Policies to be Issued, Amounts and Proposed Insureds 2 3. Interest in the Land and Owner 2 4. Description of the Land 2 SCHEDULE B -1 — Requirements 3 SCHEDULE B-2 — Exceptions 4 CONDITIONS other side of 1 YOU SHOULD READTHE COMMITMENT VERY CAREFULLY. If you have any questions about the Commitment, please contact the issuing office. Foram No. 1 343 (1 992) ALTAAIain Language Commitment COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company AGREEMENT TO ISSUE POLICY We agree to issue a policy to you according to the terms of this Commitment. When we show the policy amount and your name as the proposed insured in Schedule A, this Commitment becomes effective as of The Com- mitment Date shown in Schedule A If the Requirements shown in this Commitment have not been met within six months after the Commitment Date, our obligation under this Commitment will end. Also, our obligation under this Commitment will end when the Policy is issued and then our obligation to you will be under the Policy. Our obligation under this Commitment is limited by the following: The Provisions in Schedule A The Requirements in Schedule B -1. The Exceptions in Schedule B -2. The Conditions on the other side of this page 1 This Commitment is not valid without SCHEDULE A and Sections 1 and 2 of SCHEDULE B. "`•�.,� First American Title Insurance Company - ��`ySLE ras��a +,�� 9 + BY PRESIDENT SEPTEMOER << 3 i ATTESTS/' /`'` ,e— SECRETARY srfrcFN+ m COUNTERSIGNED Page 1 FORM NO. 1068 -2 (REV. 7/90) COMMITMENT 1. COMMITMENT DATE: SCHEDULE A JUNE 4, 1998 AT 7:30 A.M. 2. POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: POLICY AMOUNT (A) OWNERS POLICY: TO BE DETERMINED $TO BE DETERMINED PROPOSED INSURED: DEL MAR HERITAGE, LLC. (B) LOAN POLICY: TO BE DETERMINED $TO BE DETERMINED PROPOSED INSURED: TO BE DETERMINED. (C) PROPOSED INSURED: $TO BE DETERMINED TO BE DETERMINED. 3. INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THIS COMMITMENT IS OWNED, AT THE COMMITMENT DATE, BY FEE. 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) PAGE 2 FORM NO. 1068 -2 (REV. 7/90) COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET: (A) PAY THE AGREED AMOUNTS FOR THE INTEREST IN THE LAND AND /OR THE MORTGAGE TO BE INSURED. (B) PAY US THE PREMIUMS, FEES AND CHARGES FOR THE POLICY. (C) DOCUMENTS SATISFACTORY TO US CREATING THE INTEREST IN THE LAND AND /OR THE MORTGAGE TO BE INSURED MUST BE SIGNED, DELIVERED AND RECORDED. (D) YOU MUST TELL US IN WRITING THE NAME OF ANYONE NOT REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WHO WILL GET AN INTEREST IN THE LAND OR WHO WILL MAKE A LOAN ON THE LAND. WE MAY THEN MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OR EXCEPTIONS. (E) RELEASES) OR RECONVEYANCE(S) OF ITEMS) NONE. (F) OTHER - NONE. (G) YOU MUST GIVE US THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 1. ANY OFF RECORD LEASES, SURVEYS, ETC. 2. STATEMENT(S) OF IDENTITY, ALL PARTIES. 3. OTHER - NONE. PAGE 3 FORM NO. 1068 -2 (REV. 7/90) COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS ANY POLICY WE ISSUE WILL HAVE THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS UNLESS THEY ARE TAKEN CARE OF TO OUR SATISFACTION. PART ONE, SECTION ONE: 1. TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT LEVIES TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTEREST, OR CLAIMS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT WHICH COULD BE ASCERTAINED BY AN INSPECTION OF SAID LAND OR BY MAKING INQUIRY OF PERSONS IN POSSESSION THEREOF. 3. EASEMENTS, CLAIMS OF EASEMENT OR ENCUMBRANCES WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 4. DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGE IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, OR ANY OTHER FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY WOULD DISCLOSE, AND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY PUBLIC RECORDS. 5. (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C) WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT THE MATTERS EXCEPTED UNDER (A) , (B) OR (C) ARE SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 6. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL THERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. THE FOLLOWING ABOVE NUMBERED EXCEPTIONS 1 THROUGH 6 WILL BE ELIMINATED IN AN ALTA EXTENDED COVERAGE POLICY. PAGE 4 FORM NO. 1068 -2 (REV. 7/90) COMMITMENT PART ONE, SECTION TWO: 1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1998 -99, A LIEN, NOT YET PAYABLE. 2. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTES OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES: THE REQUIREMENT THAT THIS COMPANY. BE FURNISHED WITH ALL SUPPLEMENTAL TAX BILLS, IF ANY, FROM THE OWNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEFORE CLOSE OF ESCROW. 3. AN EASEMENT FOR EXISTING IRRIGATION PIPE LINES AND ELECTRIC POWER LINES; THE RIGHT, PRIVILEGE AND EASEMENT OF ERECTING, MAINTAINING OR CAUSING TO BE ERECTED AND MAINTAINED UPON THE LAND HEREBY CONVEYED, TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE POLE LINES WITH THEIR USUAL EQUIPMENT; ELECTRIC POWER AND LIGHT POLE LINES AND THEIR USUAL EQUIPMENT AND OF OPERATING THE SAME; AND A RIGHT - OF -WAY OVER SAID LAND TO INSTALL AND MAINTAIN NECESSARY IRRIGATION PIPE LINES AND DITCHES FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF WATER OVER SAID LA COSTA ACRES AND TO OPERATE THE SAME, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON SAID LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, REPAIRING AND REPLACING OR IMPROVING ANY OF SAID WORKS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF LA COSTA ACRES CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1929 IN BOOK 1660, PAGE 476 OF DEEDS. THE ROUTE OR LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM SAID INSTRUMENT. 4. AN EASEMENT FOR IRRIGATION PIPELINES AND ELECTRIC POWER LINES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF LA COSTA ACRES CORPORATION, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1929 IN BOOK 1688, PAGE 2 OF DEEDS. THE ROUTE OR LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM SAID INSTRUMENT. 5. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE SAN DIEGUITO PAGE 5 FORM NO. 1068 -2 (REV. 7/90) COMMITMENT REORGANIZATION PROJECT AREA AS DISCLOSED BY SAN DIEGO COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 390249 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 6. DEED RESTRICTION DATED OCTOBER 26, 1988 EXECUTED BY PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PAUL JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, PAUL ECKE III, PAUL ECKE SR., TRUSTEE OF THE PAUL ECKE SR. TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1983 AND THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SUBJECTED TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1989 AS FILE NO. 89- 082586 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 11. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT #94 -3 OF THE SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994 - 0488541 AND NOVEMBER 16, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0521630 BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 94 -3 OF THE SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 AS FILE NO 1996 - 0482284 UPHOLD OFFICIAL RECORDS. 7. A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1994, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; PAUL ECKE, JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983; NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; R.E.L.S., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; CHARLES S. CARTER AND RUTH DRAPER CARTER, BOTH AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER THE DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982; RAYMOND A. WHITWER, AN PAGE 6 FORM NO. 1068 -2 (REV. 7/90) COMMITMENT INDIVIDUAL; DAVID N. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; CRAIG P. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL AND GENEEN L. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL. RECORDED: DECEMBER 14, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994 - 0713677 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. AN ASSIGNMENT OF CITY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FROM CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO ENCINITAS TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY DATED DECEMBER 5, 1995 AND RECORDED DECEMBER 8, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0559945 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.. A MEMORANDUM OF ALLOCATION AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 1, 1995, UPON CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS RECORDED: DECEMBER 11, 1995 OFFICIAL RECORDS. NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, R.E.L.S., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PAUL ECKE, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, ELISABETH K. ECKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983 P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RAYMOND A. WHITWER, GENEEN L. WHITWER, DAVID N. WHITWER, CRAIG P. WHITWER, CHARLES S. CARTER, CO- TRUSTEE UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982, RUTH DRAPER CARTER, CO- TRUSTEE UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982 AND ENCINITAS TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS A SUCCESSOR TO CARLTAS COMPANY. AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0561223 OF PAGE 7 FORM NO. 1068 -2 (REV. 7/90) COMMITMENT REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 8. AN AGREEMENT FOR ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND FOR PROVISION OF SEWER SERVICE THERETO, DATED APRIL 24, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, A COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; PAUL ECKE, JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983; NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; CHARLES S. CARTER AND RUTH DRAPER CARTER, AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982; RAYMOND A. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID N. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; CRAIG P. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND GENEEN L. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL. RECORDED: MAY 30, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0225327 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. THE ANNEXATION FEES FOR THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY WHICH ARE REQUIRED BY THE ABOVE REFERENCED DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. 9. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -39 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS ENCINITAS RANCH ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WAS RECORDED JUNE 16, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0254447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 10. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE ENCINITAS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ENCINITAS RANCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 14, PAGE 8 FORM NO. 1068 -2 (REV. 7/90) COMMITMENT 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0299308 AND AUGUST 25, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0377363, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 11. A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 ( ENCINITAS RANCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), WAS RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0377298 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0489781 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN AMENDED AND RESTATED NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN, RECORDED MAY 27, 1997 AS FILE NO. 1997- 0244675 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 12. AN EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC FACILITIES, OVERHEAD AND /OR UNDERGROUND AND APPURTENANCES FOR THE TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRICITY, COMMUNICATION FACILITIES, OVERHEAD AND /OR UNDERGROUND AND APPURTENANCES, PIPELINES AND APPURTENANCES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, RECORDED MAY 13, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996 - 0241944 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN LOT 45 AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 13333. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 13. AN UNRECORDED MITIGATION AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 13, 1994, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AS DISCLOSED BY SUPPLEMENT TO MITIGATION AGREEMENT, RECORDED JUNE 20, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996 - 0312169 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A SUPPLEMENT TO MITIGATION AGREEMENT DATED MAY 10, 1996, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. RECORDED: JUNE 20, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996 - 0312169 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS LOT 45. PAGE 9 FORM NO. 1068 -2 (REV. 7/90) COMMITMENT 14. AN AGREEMENT REGARDING IMPROVEMENT OF SUBDIVISION SEWERS, DATED DECEMBER 14, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY. RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996 - 0456801 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 15. THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND PROVISIONS OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT REFERRED TO IN THE VESTING HEREIN, AND THE EFFECT OF ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SUCH TERMS, COVENANTS AND PROVISIONS. 1997 -1998 TAX INFORMATION: CODE AREA: PARCEL NO.: 1ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT: LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPT: 19412 257 - 040 -46 -00 $7,075.43 PAID $7,075.43 PAID $1,312,740.00 $-o- $-o- PAGE 10 FORM NO. 1068 -2 (REV. 7/90) COMMITMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 45 OF AMENDED MAP OF CITY OF ENCINITAS MAP NO. 13258, CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 94 -066, UNITS I, II AND III, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 13333, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 3, 1996. PAGE 11 4 ^;ERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLr- WITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVER SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances)aslrioing a regulating or prohibiting the occupancy. use or enjoyment of the land, or regulaling the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on Me land. or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area Of the land, or the effect of any violation at any such law ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records al Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances. adverse claims, or other matters (a) created. suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant. (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Polity or at the dale such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and nor disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the dale such insured claimant became an insured hereunder, (c) resulting in no loss or damage to Me insured claimant, (d) attaching or created subsequent to Dale of Polity (except to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for slreel improvements under construction or completed at Dale Of Policy) 4. Unenforceability of Rre lien of the insured mortgage because or failure of the insured at Date of Policy Or of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness to comply with applicable 'doing business' laws of the stale in which the land is situated 5. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1970 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American rand Title Association renders Policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy, the exclusions set lodh in paragraph 4 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does nor insure against loss or damage by reason Of the matters shown in parts one and two following Part One 1. Taxes or assessments which are not sown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property a by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof 3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are nor shown by the public recortls. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. and which are not shown by public records. 5. Untalented mining claims. reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance Ihereol. water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, a right to a lien, far services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter fumibbeq imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1992 WITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The hollowing matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys lees of expenses which arise by reason of 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, of regulations) nestricling. regulaling. prohibiting 0' relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or MloyMnl of the land, (ii) the character, dimensions Of location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on me land. (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a pad, or (iv) envirormentat protection. or the effect of any violation of these laws, Ordinances or governmental regulaticif except to the extern that a notice of the enticement thereof or a notice of a defect lien or encumbrance resull,ng from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy (b) Any governmental police power rot excluded by (a) above. except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in me public records at Dale of Policy. 2. flights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. but not excluding from coverage any taking which has Occurred prior to Dale Of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances. adverse claims or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant. (b) ME known to the Company. not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. but known to the insured claimant and no disclosed in writing to the Canparry by the inured claimant prix to the date the insured elaimai became an insured under this policy, (c) resulting in no loss a damage to die insured claimant. (e) attaching a created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures me privily of Ire lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory hen for semces, labv or material or the extent insurance is afforded herein as Io assessments for sheet improvements under construction a completed at date of policy), a (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been suslairled if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. UnenforceaDilily of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy. or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebledrress, to comply wilh applicable 'doing business' laws of the state in which the (and is situated S. Invalidity, or unenforceabilily of the lien of line insured morlpape, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law 6. Any statutory lien [or Services. labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or Work relaled to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Dale of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Dale of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 1. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar cmdiros' rights laws, that is Dared on Ed the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance of haudulenl transfer . on fill the subordinalion of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination. or (iii) the transaction creating the Interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential Dander except where the preferential transfer results from the failure. (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer, Or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor, 7. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American rand Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 6 above are used and rue following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy SCHEDULE B Th:s poucy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys lees or expenses) which arise by reason of 1. Taxes or assessments which are nor snown as existing liens by the records of any Wing authority that levies pares at assessments on real property or by the public records. 2 Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascenained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof 3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area. encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and wl are not shown by public records. 5. Uapalenled mining claims: r¢5¢rvdlioW or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. water rights, claims Or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services. labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 8. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY - 1992 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The fallowing matters are expressly excluded Irom the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage. costs, attorneys lees or expenses which arise by reason of 1. (a) Any law. ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and Zoning laws, ordinances. or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land. (it) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land Or any parcel of which the land is or was a pan. or liv) environmental protection, or the effect Of any violation of these laws. ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereat or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in N public records at Dale of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation ar alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice 01 the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prim to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights at a purchaser Ion value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters. (a) created. suffered. assumed m agreed to by the insured claimant, (b) not (mown to the Company. not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimanl and nor disclosed in wiling to be Company by the insured claimant prior 10 the date the insured claimant became an insured under this polity: (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured Claimanb (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy: or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in Ina Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy. by reason of the operation of federal barroupty. slide insolvency, at similar creditors' rights laws. Mal is based on'. (i) the transaction creating the estate or Interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance m fraudulent transfer, w (ii) the Iransaclion creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a p eferentual transfer except where the meferential transfer results from Me failure . (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer: or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor, 9. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY - 1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set tort in paragraph 8 above are used and the lollowing exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does flat insure against loss or damage (and the Company will nor pay costs. attorneys' lees or expenses) which arise by reason at Pan One: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies Wes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, imeresls, or claims which are not shown by the public tabards but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements. claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, contlicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims. reservations or exceptions in parents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof: water rights, claims m title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services. labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished. imposed by law and not shown by tree public records, 10. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY - 1987 EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B. you are not insured against loss. costs. attorneys' lees and expenses resulting from 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning. • land use • land division • improvements on the land • environmental projection This exclusion does not apply to violations m the enforcement of these mailers which appear in the public records at Policy Date. This exclusion does nor limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 Of Covered rifle Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless. • a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on Ilse Policy Dale • the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding an you it you bought Me land without knowing of the Wing. 3. Title Risks'. • that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you • that are known to you, but nor to us, on the Policy Dale - unless they appeared In the public records • that result in no loss to you • that list ahed your title after the Policy Dale - this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your title. 5. lack of a right. • to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A, or • in streets, alleys, or waterways trial touch • 'and 1 This exclusion does not limit the access coverage'- Item IL aRred Title Risks. `� ' Reco ding Requested by San Diego Ca3 A Mearic Company When roawdod, mail to: P.O. Box 1331 San Diego, CA 92112 Atm; OHioe Service EB S DOC 4 199 ?41944 13— MAY -199 39,33 AM DTI IAL RECORDS SM 1 O 8 r #Toter � r Cd� CORDER RF: 7.00 FEES+ 2.00 Afs 5.00 NA IFt L09 Project No_ 513719-010420 -- -- - -� °"' Coast No.: 2537040 R 1499440 Tmisfa Tax N• w APN No.t pending SAN DIE GAS a E�i,CIRIC�{Oltap.aNY — C.LIC —etc. Z FAsyMXNT CARLTAS COMPANY, a 6aforeln limited partaerakip hacotafter called "Grantor", grants to SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY. a corpporation, betdnafhY called "Grantee", an easement and right of way to erect, conswocL change the size of, improve, rw ms nw-t, relocate. repair, maintain and use facilities consisting of: (1) F.tecoic facilities. overlsaf, and/or underground and appurtenances for the transtnission and distribution of c1ccoicity, (2) Communication facilities, overhead and/or underground and Lpputtnanuss, (3) Pipelines and appurmrua es for Lay and all Purposes together with the right of ingress thereto and egress thne6vm ova said easement and over other practical mutes across Grantor's land situated in the County of San Diego. State of California Lot 14, Let 39, Lot 40 and Lota 42 through Lot 45 J*d=tre of CM OF ENCZ41TAS TRACT NO. 94-066, Ualw 1, 2 sad 3, according to Map thereof No. 13253, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said County of San Diego. The easements in the aforesaid lands of Greater shalt be more pw6cularty desarLed in Pasta "A ", Parcel "R" and Parcel "C' as follows: PARCEL-A"! Within said Lot I4 and Lot 41, a strip of land 6.DO foot in width, said strip lying adjamn m and coincident with the exterior boundary of-ML CAMLNO REAL", as said street is drown and del'mea on said Map, PARCEL "B": Within said Ins 39, lot 40, Lot 43 and Lot 44 a strip of land 6.00 foot in width, said strip lying adjwmt to and coincident with the exterior boundary of 'NIA CAN MIA ", as said sttxt is shown and delineated on said Map- PARCEL 'C": Within said Lot 43 and Lot 45, a strip of land 6.00 foot in width, said strip tying adjacent to and coincident with the exterior boundary of "GARDEN VIEW ROAD" as said sweet is shown and delineated on said Map. Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1996 241944 Page 1 of 3 Comment: CATHY Grantor will ecacise only such reserved rights in said land as will not intntfnc with or prohibit the fire and complae rise and e,Uoymmt by Gr tajk its suarssor rx assi&R of the rights hereby granted. Grantee shall have the right to assign any or all rights granted in this ea,,,m t t in whole Q in part to other eUmpanies providing utility or communication s ices, Grantee shall have the right to t* cut, remove, or trim interfering plants and trees, and to keep said easement free from and to pteveat my pawn. including Grantor and successors and assigns, from aecring, placing, or storing on said casement r ent any flammable or oth haards and any structures, objects, or earth fills/cuts or other obstructions, except walls and fences The legal description for this eaumeot was prepared by San Diego Gas k Electric Company pursuant to Section 8730 of the Business and Professions Code, State of California. Prepared by LLK Date 417 -96 cmcc066 Checked By_PL - s•irTry-al Dated April 29, 1996 BY: Caritas Company, a California limited parmersbip BY: C"w Mansgemcnt, a Califomis corporation Its 1 ner Presid Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1996.241944 Page 2 of 3 Comment. CATHY a CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE state of California 10ais County Of San Diego On April 29, 1996 before me, Karen A. Phelps' Notary Public ux ...r.TTAaren,eal -aa •+.,c oatnoT.w,uar personally appeared Christopher C. Calkins— rriL Or�1(5 personally known to me - AAH. FLtiPl4YAMC. rI' AVAIYfbP/ V# i/S'Af /i:#iIAt9�SrGa7 /Pr/d4S�FP to be the person(M whose name(30 is /did subscribed to the within Instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/6AWP)jry executed the some in his/M3fjAh6'tt authorized KwnA � capacity(**), and that by his/fyp/lht / coummI 3Ms signature(s) on the instrument the person(g), or the entity upon behalf of which the �O ieat"3'= person(S) acted, executed the instrument. W ITNESS my hand:anr?ptficial seal. nnrinr.l A 7 GOVERNMENT CODE 27361.7 I CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTY OF PURJURY THAT THE NOTARY SEAL ON THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS STATEMENT IS ATTACHED READS AS FOLLOWS: NAME OF NOTARY DATE OF COMMISSION EXPIRES IAN. 3, 1998 COUNTY WHERE BOND IS FILED SAN DIEGO PLACE OF EXECOTION SAN DIEGO DATE v 7A x'T 29- 1796 FOR: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY P.O. BOX 1831 SAN DIEGO, CA 92112 r C[977 NATIONAL TA 19300AT N•E ft+ Ar PA. SW 71M•Caw7 PAh CA Wa "" Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1996.241944 Page 3 of 3 Comment. CATHY OF nett eunlr,W Tmr WJ 76 .. AND RElVRN tb•✓ $TAT% OF CALIFORNIA 7— Ca K S b 6 CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION B AN Dleao AarA OfrtCA RF 0 8 1 5 8 l I333 CANIRO DCL YID HOUTN. SUITE 125 AR AN DISCO, CA 92100 -3520 p-n MC 2 91rl1L--15 ..:. �.c�. 16 AHif:55 g DEED RESTRICTION 89FED _ Paul � Parch, a Wifanfa r• , 4 I.WHEREAS. @ilr,mI�ifinr tn.+,..,d,I,. Cj,. A w (b-trustes9 ure' trust /g:cemrlt data] March 7, 1983, 6 min Hied IIT min r'ke i7._ Thrfm nl ttn tail R>le 0• ]bFrt (kited 4t)Ombe 8 19fi e hereinafter referred to an owner(s), is the record owner or the 7 COLlOwing teal property: S 5m Erhihlt "B" 9 10 11 bscsiaafter referred to an the subject propertyl and 12 11. WHEREAS, the California Coastal Commission i# 13 acting on behalf of the People of the State of California; and 14 III. WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the 16 coastal zone an defined in Section 70103 Of the California Public Le Resources Code (hereinafter referred to ae the California Coastal 17 Act); and 18 IV. WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Coastal Act of _ Caritas company, a Cellfomia Limned Partnership 19 1976, mtez.•Osnard applied to the California Coastal Cowisnion foe a 20 coastal development permit for the development on the subject 21 property described above: and 22 V. WHEREAS, coastal development permit No. 6 -88 -274 23 was granted on 10113/88 by the California 24 Coastal Commission to accordance with the provision of the Staff 25 Recommendation and Findings, attached berets as Exhibit ,A• and 2slberein incorporated by reference: and M" ' ;p r Oi C� ZS• �1 r]! r SEP tftq !., 2. Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 1 of45 Comment CATHY 77 - 1 VI, WHEREAS, coastal development --permit. NO. _G-BP-274 g Wall mubjeot to the terms and conditions including but not limited g to the following conditional 4 L fetbee [eflullvll [ Mar to the teem "e ea IN aesttel denlepes KT 1 \it ii17f1 nRN no h11MM ratlrlctlno R [[dust each of the oublxet prpeatlest The abject pperty H re %object la the turret Provisions of Me tort)HO[ C..t roof Pons ate LKrI Coastal Proq roe (LCP) Rf the pomlt Iathwlty B of the Ceedd roellslo v a rem ...r .. emir and 1M @object properly, post oetlsfy ell 01 "a terse, tsmltlRl am provlslaon of the LIP 7 IKiadl ", bat art Ilelted to. the 04"CAWlal Croplam /sm'Iftc Fla. repolrw..ts. Should the terroot LIP M seemed N Oman"" by a ow ter abpted by 1M Cwt1y of La eloya ar a erccmv local [arorwMd Jj p ..q ptI�9 Kmlt jar edlllon owr the araa..01 certified by the G .to Cepoladd, th.. IDI &"Joel preaeety 1"11 be WJKt to the term. cemlttepo 1m ~.I., of the aeseeded w 0. ter. 9 We restriction Is Into dN Only toil" poll's d ..toil" "Itr /ctlKl an the axe of IM uljoct property ea� to of totem" Is I "Iosr of ap 1O rleht to c411repe the aiwitvy of I" rootrtctl ". ae ce"a"ltlao w also me, uses "t Is created by this declaration. 11 the 0149 e/ "ties with respect to those potter, 4 of Intard" to 1 "9est that other tam stn rpaletlonn do cot ePPIJ to the sobJKl L2 'pONrly am Its vesper so porthOQ, )Kasserasa @r. enter K retailer of the 1044tt'"party ah's11 ad feel to am..tapo ley deeel.Ppoal an the .AjKt p"IIrIY ullheot 1bt11a l" all ether aoa.tal approvals. 13 this restriction Iha11 be roawdN, le a Parse am content occglebb to the [unit" Mrectw, TM rletrlctlen dell be recorded Ins of wlor lions or 14 sataeroean, Other Iran tea llxen. Mlth tea Executive alrecter Mite,us my afrett the IMOnt help tarrayed. III, aned of rocordatlon of Inln rot trlltlea shill he aurltiod to em phnwrledxed In a Mfr by the tree lira la of "tier wlw to the tnnmlttel of IM prmlt. 1B !. Lnonitwnt b KYelaaponl rtll[[➢. eyprorll of this poll IMII at be Ieterorobd o t emaln�ol to j ptlare of lead pant or (Ircabtlon sgtea. Mead epR ma port" M1mIH1a potter eat' "ntf eaProred In this 17 O -dt. ll<�etels O.aoltpwnt yaltarat u111 M blerolosd at the lion M" r eprtd em rtvlMd by the Coastal [epo1nlM Per the emir, c "tlsows Isle Pont %loldlne. • le 19 imposition of the above conditions the proposed development could go not be found consistent With the provisions of the California 21 Coastal hot of 1976 and that a petmit could therefore not have 22 been granted; and t 25 VIIL. WHEREAS. it in intended that thin Dead Restriction 24 is irrevocable. and shell ocomtitute enforceable restriotione) and gd IE. WHEREAS, Owner has elected to comply with the 26 conditions Imposed by Permit No. r> -88-274 mo as to enable 27 Owner to undertake the development authorised by the permit. „ count rlra semwanu"wu Mr rich .. Z. 1 r'p : '1 . . . : 9. 1 Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 2 of 45 Comment CATHY l f 1 i % t } :. 0 - 78 1 NOM. THReg:►On, in'caemideration of the grsating of permit No. 6- 88-274 to the Owner by the California coastal commission. S the Owner hereby icrevocably cove cents with the California Coastal 4 commission that there be and hereby Is created the following B 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 13 14 le 17 le 19 20 21 22 23 24 20 as 27 eovernvea restrictions on the use and enjoyment or said subject property, to be attached to and become a pact of the deed to the property. The undersigned Ownee, tot himself /herself and for hie /her heirs. a /signs, and successors in interest, covenants and agrees ChaC: The subject property is subject to the current provisions of the certified County of San 01e90 Local Coastal Program (LCP) and the permit authority of the Coastal Commission or a successor agency and the subject property must satisfy all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the LCP including, but not limited to, the Agricultural Cropland /Specific Plan requirements. Should the current LCP be amended or superceded by a new LCP adopted by the County of San Diego or a successor local governmental agency having permit jurisdiction over the area, and certified by the Coastal Commission, than the subject prapetty shall be subject to the terms, conditions and provisions of the amended or new LCP. This restriction is intended only to give notice of existing restrictions on the use of the subject property and is not intended as a waiver-of any right to challenge the validity of any restriction. No conservation or open space easement Is created by this declaration. The giving of notice with respect to these mutters is not intended to suggest that other lard use regulations do not apply to the subject property and any prospective purchaser, encumbrancer, owner or occupier of the subject property should not Seek to undertake any development on the subject property,wilhout obtaining all other governmental approvals. t� If any provision of theme restrictions in held to be Invalid or for any reason becomes unenforceable. no ocher provision shall be thereby affected or impaired. I I fIrk ai,l i i �I C� 'r Order EXP- 15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 3 of 45 Comment: CATHY r ' 1 9 3 4 0 e 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 1e 17 Le 19 20 81 22 23 24 2e er•a..a NM4YWY Inl Vp. HIi 0 - 79 -4- Said deed restriction shall re*aia in cull force and effect during the period that Raid permit, or any modification or amendment thereof, cousin* effective, and during the period that the development authorized by said permit or any modification of said development, remain* in existence in or upon say part of, and thereby confers benefit upon, the subject property described herein, and to that extent, said dead restriction is hereby deemed and agreed by Owner to be a covenant cunning with the land. and *ball bind Owner and ail his /hoc assigns or euccesaor■ in interest Owner agrees to record this Deed Restriction in the Recorder's office for the County of San Dle¢a as soon as p0e0ible sttec the date of execution. DATED: �� \IOW �'� 2h, 19.L PAPIECKE RANal, a forma Corporat U1 Ecke, Jr., Preal nt AS ANY, a lfornia Limited rtnerehip ul Fcke, Jr., General Partner PA JR. AND ELLS ii K. ECKE, Co-Tr utd 3 ul Jr. and El bath K. Ecke, Co-Tr � r Pau , (11 PACO�O, Sf USiF.E, utd 8/8/85 Pau] poke, Sr., Trustee (NOTARY ACKNONLEDGMWT. On NEXT PAGE) I 1 �. real r • i n o: Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 4 of 45 Comment: CATHY el� c 1 ti i NQTE TQ NOTARY PUBLIC: STATE OF CAIWFOWu COUNTY OF $An Dln¢o MAA ANN( MOYFR t w�� pew ahem y�w�r.lw! STATE OF GLLI/ORNIA San Diego Cowl Y M tK MaA ANNf YpYNR Irf.�awM ,p 0 - 80 - 5- If you ace notairiting the sioluturee of On this 26th dayol October I In the Year 19-L8. heMre ". IM undersign. a NWry FtMrt M and Mr SAM Scala, pWSduey aWWW Paul Ecke, Jr., Co Trustee . W MMny known M ma lo, p,0.ed M me On IM MNf Al sairawrty " "Ace) is M IM pWSen_ whose Nme_ fuOUrMad lO IM ngen MfnWnenl. and ackmWedped l0 rd1 that _he_ OYKUIed It WIINESS my AaAd Wtl o1KHl Mal )ta 26th Ocroher 88 On INS, ____ day 01 __ -_ _ _.mme Tea la_. boor@ rite. TIM utW"psl. a Stan Pehkc M and b sad Slate. OW WnallY aMeued _ .— YsuiJ.cltfe.- alra - -- _ _ ___ .pIMNaY kA0wn l0 me IW arpted M M on W thus W seflMldy erdencel 10 M IM Wse1f wIM eaKU1M IM Wplln Instewnl as __ Frtildenl Hie 841da"XIS =W,kaM. d IM eerpaamn Reran maned . and aCknooledged M W that pM CWFWWan CntnIw II put", was by U"s W a rascllAen of Its rear! d entlert. YniNE55 WY nerd led oWhcY. if'µ a �J (�w Cam.. •ti asmasrnMn -twat .-I W - Ia... +I. nit. w n t M �/' lc Fud III and b said State wnamnea w..IwS STATE OP CAUFORNIA t W. COUNTY OF S ➢t J On October 26 1988 betwc me, Ih< endeni/md, a Notary Public in end (or Said Stu', ptronally appcartd Paul Ecke. Jr. — -- patWnaNy known t0 Inc 01 o e/ Mlny ecidena o be p'mnwh En who emoted she within imtrurnent is (Mt![61 Mrner*Fv;E%WA;;m of the partnership shat e. cutcd the within imtramcnl, Said acknowledged W Im that sea Tnrtncnhip executd the Mme. WITNESS ray y(jh�enpd�a. +td GMnff.6-1 aW�sl. �/jA,�y 1 S. &noun "" / r , Moyer M_' bsdribed Il'Iw,arts lw� �I �oo,W ,cJl i 1 r: I I I, a I.4 i 1' OI I {I I 1 �II I Ai, r r l I, �AI l Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 5 of 45 Comment CATHY -'S inI ''It, YAl1Y MWE YDYER I.�rwa.rce.� ►(Yliw V ,r ,., W POR Il'Iw,arts lw� �I �oo,W ,cJl i 1 r: I I I, a I.4 i 1' OI I {I I 1 �II I Ai, r r l I, �AI l Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 5 of 45 Comment CATHY -'S inI ,yk s P 1 L a (I - 81 IL you are notarising the signatures of goes signing on behalf of a corporation, partnership, trust S Cc., please use the correct notary Jurat (acknowledgment) as ♦ •kplalned in your Notary Public Law Book. 6 as STATE OF CAIN UTIN, in ens WUNTT OF fall �bleao On October 28, 1988 IN ....yi[. _d sa,., p«wnrN.aw.•M Paul Ecke, III • a a«aaeanr .mom „o �e c> aa..a w ,.. ue in. oa.r d.em Iaclnry enJenc.Ila M,1,e er.wtiK,.M•e nweOU WM.un acnbaO,a IN-IN nul,yn«A and ac,ro+MUVad 1. m. INn, ,wIMRM,ri aaKOl.d,n. um. WITNESS mT„aM.n'd^MI.JW,.�.a/�// cy Saloon vWE OF rkL"NIA COUNTYOF IAN DIEGO ereaFea T� aaYle alseee ueeAeeoow wa.�a�tas.r 26 17 eamn was e.w.r runty. Nr�otyw aft , ie subscribed "O w aft fNYI tY W1Y[ aeFeft lNOw eCUted SC. eNae,mdmu,^ 1 wnrlasrn ONA11f0 ni...I.. Iw .—I On gds 31st _myel October In IN yw ly R8 ee4rF me, er 'laae%17aaa, a W Fltlk n rq b rag 54e. pvTeWy nFV-± P ul Ecke, Sr. I �. MTSM104 kwon m me la pww m ne on IM kcal[ W Ffisxkry n+pl"1 n be Ike perm_ eessa n.,_ illsatllpfe bX,. wdMn,n[VUroM, 10F[ennAlT xd Ulesael Jln_ ancuud S. 7 {IJ�� WITNESS Trry NnE ane eXICW- r am.y Flak In W r Us SUN. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND POB RAID COUNTY AND STATE i I �a III II 1 1� i 01 T �rl a s•F ] C L Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 6 of 45 Comment CATHY a r 82 _5- 1 If YOU ace notarizing the signatures of g Persons eigaing on behalf of a corporation, partnecehip, trust, S eta., please use the correct octacy Jucat (acknowledgment) as 4 eiplainsd in your Notary Public Law Book. 6 B State of California, County of as a this day of in the FeFw en m .. w - a B -. ..oaaaocnan. voonty oL as hie day of in the before me a ry public, personally appeared onally known to me (cc proved to no on the basis or t olfactory evidence) to be the Pocono wboee name is subscribed his inotrumeut, and acknowledged that he /she executed it. NOTARY PUBLIC IN COVNTY AND 9TATR to 7, I 're1IIIII'. II ' �I �I IE�iI f .. 1 O . Order.' EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 7 of 45 Comment. CATHY a 2 . wunn or San Diego o+ October 28, 1988 �j w sw..,.,....w. .Iro..,.e Elisabeth K. Fcke, Co- Trustee lie Of Q is subscribed o„N:,w.✓,O.n io Ne wi v.a,re w.r.„in. n..uN w,n OFFICIAL WAL axe outed it. IWO�,..c.nc.lme.,ne o.,wNal.ro,.namwv�N. wn 1 JDtte LMWD0K WYMIO eM wInn,NnV...N,M Wnawl.pV.J to �'llul aLlLaw oaoocounr T nLILM/mI/u «ui.a ,n<sLNe ,y Ary CyaL tw JLa fI. Ism E Miss -1 n.nO VW a„uN.aW E A � %y��♦ �}�.;, ,r� f . ^A/YVX� „L..,,Lao.l,<..I..�.,��...,, IN AND FOR 8A[ SNnG.NLANVI re FeFw en m .. w - a B -. ..oaaaocnan. voonty oL as hie day of in the before me a ry public, personally appeared onally known to me (cc proved to no on the basis or t olfactory evidence) to be the Pocono wboee name is subscribed his inotrumeut, and acknowledged that he /she executed it. NOTARY PUBLIC IN COVNTY AND 9TATR to 7, I 're1IIIII'. II ' �I �I IE�iI f .. 1 O . Order.' EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 7 of 45 Comment. CATHY l> 0 - 83 - 6- I This is to cectity that the dead restriction sot toctp above g is hereby acknowledged by the undersigned officer on bob If of tha 3 California Coastal Commission pursuant to authority conferred by 4 the California Coastal Commission when it granted Coastal y Development Permlt No. L'rltJ �r on 013 a and the California Coastal Commission conaants to recordation 7 thereof by its duly authorized officer. g Dated: 000 ' Cal focn • Coastiaa oaasttal Commission g 10 11 12 15 14 IS 17 10 19 20 21 22i 23' 24 25 26 27 i • tauln 1•Mae � �.w reluruw STATE OP California ) )es COUNTY OF Sen Diego ) On Te_llllt 1 5-1 1i 7 j before me the undereisne4 Notary Public, personally appeared personally known to me to be (or proved to me on the basis mf aatiefactory evidence) to be the person who executed this instrument as the Ftab, +�Aw��r >r.±ur:1.�R{uend authorized representative of the California Coastal Commission and acknowledged to me that the California Coastal Commission executed Lt. OFFICIAL SEAL MMOH PHECLEY NDTAnM DEGC •CAIf pfNtA SAN DEW GOtN 'Y M' Caaw f, "., $. J. t9a9 NOTAB PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE AND COUNTY rA Z. �A i �i Order: EXP- 15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 8 of 45 Comment: CATHY EXHIBIT "A" ,n d uuldMe —M aHdnR1 �dMR of m OMMMAµ a.,.w CALIFORNIA LIFO oC Filed: 6/21188 SAMMooOASTAL COMMISSION 1311 caawo NI M EFUM EUnE 131 49th Day: - Waived + uM DRO4 CA WNMW 180th Day: 12125188 , 14191 MV" Staff: Paw -SO `rf Staff Report: 9/19/68 Nearing Date: 10/11- 1.4 /88 !� REGULAR [ALE NOAR STAFF REPORT AMU PRCLI141MANY qt CugmEN0ATI0N ` C Application No.: 6 -68 -274 1 P Applicant: Carltas Company Agent: Lagers Associates F4 Description: boundary 640 acre 1 r,` a. existinsite containing 37 celsuatmsiteaofa n agricultural operation. New parcels will range frog 8 acres to 14S acres. No other development proposed at this time. Lot Area 690 acres Zoning S -68 Plan Designation Agricultural Cropland (SPA -2.8) - w +i l� Site: West side of E1 Camino Real, from one -half mile south of la Blvd., extending Leucadle Bivd. to one mile north of Leucad westerly to I -5, Encinitas, San Diego County. Substantive file Documents: Certified County of San Diego Local coastal Prograe Agricultural Preserve Contract AP 67 -03 Boundary Adjustment Plat 1887 -146 COP 16 -87 -645 (Carltas Company) �l STAFF N07ES: ~ Summary of Staff's Preliminary Reco m ndatien: 41 Staff is recommending approval of the proposed boundary adjustment subject ly rl to special conditions advising the applicant and future owners that no this shall be portions of any parcel created or adjusted as pert of permit Specific Plan requirements established within considered to be exempt from the for the Ecke Ranch. Additionally, staff recommends the certified County LCP finding that the parcel boundaries, road easements, etc. will I! i adoption of a not be considered a precedent for any future pattern of development. r PRE INL 1NAgt `TAFF RECONNENDATION: /64 The staff recommends the Commission adopt the following resolution: 4 1 1� F.xntbil "A' i I Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 9 of 45 Comment: CATHY 6 -Da -274 Page 2 Approval with Conditions. 85 The Coneoission hereby grants a permit for the proposed development, subject to the conditions below, on the grounds that the development will be In conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act of 1976, will not prejudice the ability of the local government having jurisdiction over the area to prepare a Local Coastal Program conforming to the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act, and will not have any significant adverse Impacts on the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Duality Act. 11. Standard Conditions. See attached page. Ill. Special Conditions. The permit Is subject to the following conditions; 1, future Agricultural Conversion. Prior to the Issuance of the coastal development permit, the permtttee s all record the following restriction against each of the subject properties: The subject property is subject to the current provisions of the certified County of San Diego Local Coastal Program (LCP) and the permit authority of the Coastal tnmmiss /on or a successor agency and the subject property must satisfy all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the LCP Including, but not limited to, the Agricultural Cropland /Specific Plan requirements. Should the current LCP be amended or suparceded by a new LCP adopted by the County of San Diego or a successor local governmental agency having permit jurisdiction over the area, and certified by the Coastal Commission, then the subject property shall be subject to the terms, conditions and provisions of the amended or new LCP. This restriction is intended only to give notice of existing restrictions on the use of the subject property and is not intended as a waiver of any right to challenge the validity of any restriction. No conservation or open space easement is created by this declaration. The giving of notice with respect to these matters 1s not intended to srggest that other land use regulations do not apply to the subject property and any prospective purchaser, encumbrancer, owner or occupier of the subject property should not seek to undertake any development an the subject property without obtaining all other governuental approvals. This restriction shall be recorded. In a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director. The restriction shall be recorded free of prior liens or encumbrances, other than tax liens, which the Executive Director believes may effect the interest being conveyed. Evidence of recordation of this restriction shall be submitted to and acknowledged In writing by the Executive Director prior to the transmittal of the permit. Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 10 of 45 Comment CATHY 4 6-ee -274 Page 3 2. Come /tmentsg_DtY)looment Pattern. Approval of this permit shell not be Interpreted as a caItnent to a pattern of development or circulation system, based upon the parcel boundaries and /or easements approved In this permit. appropriate development patterns will be determined at the time %Alen the Specific Plan Is prepared and reviewed by the Coastal Commission for the entire contiguous Eck* Ranch holding.. If. Findings and Declarations. The Commission finds and declares as follows: 1. Protect Ntstorv. The subject application was Initially scheduled for the Commission's August hearing. The staff recommendation was for approval with a dead restriction acknowledging that the County CCP requirements for the Eck* Ranch holdings would still be applicable to each of the resubdivided parcels. The applicant expressed concern about the Imposition of a deed restriction on the properties and requested a postponinent to respond to the staff recommendation. in the Interim, the applicant submitted alternate language for a deed restriction and staff has reviewed the proposed modificatlons. After further consultation, it was agreed that staff would propose the alternate wording, which was more acceptable to the applicant, to the recommended conditions. The currently proposed Special Condition /1 reflects the applicant's requested wording. 2. Detailed Protect oesoriotlon. Proposed are a series of boundary adjustments on a 690 acre Darrel known as Ecke Ranch, the site of a major poinsettia growing operation. The site currently consists of 37 separate assessor's parcels. The boundary adjustment will result in 22 separate legal parcels ranging in site from eight acres to 145 acres. Also Included in the proposal is the formalization of an existing road easement running roughly north /south from toe current terminus of a street dedicated as part of COP 6- 81 -6e5 (Caritas Company) at the extreme southeastern corner of the contiguous Ecke properties. The site of the proposed development is located in a currently unincorporated portion of San Diego County, subject to the jurisdiction of the certified County of San Diego Local Coastal Program. The site is located along the El Camino Real corridor, which extends northerly from the City of Encinitas' limits to the City of Carlsbad's jurisdiction. The site is bounded by the City of Encinitas on the west, south and east, and by the City of Carlsbad on the north. Tne site is bounded by residential development on the west, by commercial and residential development on the south, and by small greenhouse operations on the north. The site is also bounded by commercial development on the east. across E1 Camino Real. E1 Camino Real is the coastal zone boundary In this area. 3. Conjlstency with Coastal Act Policies. Section 30250(a) of the Act states: Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 11 of 45 Comment. CATHY 67 6 -60 -274 Page 4 (a) Now residential, commercial. or industrial development, except as othervise provided in this division, shall be located within, contiguous with, or in close proximity to, existing developed areas able to accommodate it or, where such areas are not able to accommodate it, in other areas with adequate public services and where it will not have a significant adverse effects, either individually or cumulatively, on coastal resources. In addition, Section 30242 of the Act governs the conversion of agricultural lands to non - agricultural uses. It states: All other lands suitable for agricultural use shall not be converted to nonagricultural uses unless (1) continued or rene d agricultural use Is not feasible, or (2) such conversion would preserve prime agricultural land or concentrate development consistent with Section 30250. Any such permitted conversion shall be compatible with continued agricultural use on surrounding lends. While the proposed boundary adjustment will not result in a conversion of the site to non - agricultural uses, the proposed project involves the resubdivision of currently undeveloped land which is mostly in agricultural production at this time. Given that no additional development of the parcels treated under this permit would occur, them are no immediate conflicts with either Section 30242 or 30250(a) of the Act. However, the reorganization of the parcels may be construed to set the pattern for future development, facilitating the conversion of agricultural lands to non - agricultural uses. In particular, a road easement has been proposed which could Influence future development of both the adjacent parcels and the circulation system for this area. That is, the recognition of the existing road easement could establish a pattern of development which my not provide the greatest level of protection for coastal resources or continued agriculture. for these reasons, the special conditions have been proposed. Special Condition #1 places the applicants and any future property owners on notice through the use of a deed restriction which runs with the land that the Commission would not consider the revised property boundaries to establish any particular development pattern. under current LCP requirements, a specific plan for the entire site must be reviewed at one tine, allowing for a comprehensive overview of land uses and circulation improvements. special Condition #1 reaffirms the Specific Plan requirement contained in the certified LCP land use designation, and will, to the maxinwm extent feasible, reduce the possibilities for adverse impacts on agricultural viability or coastal resources. Special Condition 02 also seeks to avoid any perceived commitment to a particular development pattern through this permit action. while approval of this permit would recognize the #misting road easement, Special Condition #2 has boon proposed to avoid making any commitment to development not proposed at this time through approval of this road alignment. Without specific development proposals at this time, it would be inappropriate for the Commission to ratify any development pattern or potential circulation system. Order.' EXP- 15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 12 of 45 Comment. CATHY P - 88 5 -RR -274 Page 5 Given these conditions, the Commission's ability to comprehensively review the overall development plan for the Eck* Ranch is protected and the project is consistent with Sections 30214 and 30250(a) of the Act. 4. Loc vestal Pla nnino. Section 30604 (a) also requires that a coastal develaprwnt pe rn It he ll be,issued only if the Commission finds that the permitted development will not prtjudice the ability of the local government to prepare a Local Coastal Program (LCP) In conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act. In this Instance, such a finding can be made for the proposed boundary adjustment. In the case of the proposed project, the site is located in that area still subject to the requirements of the certified County of San Oiego LCP. In addition, the site Is within the sphere of influence of the newly - incorporated City of Encinitas, and Is surrounded by the new jurisdiction on three sides. Encinitas has expressed interest In the Ranch's future development and Its circulation element potentially includes roadways which will cross the ranch. The County's certified lend use designation for the project site Is unique. The site of the proposed development is currently planned Agricultural Cropland (AC - SPA 2.0) In the certified County LCP. This land use designation was formulated specifically to deal with this and other large agricultural holdings in the County's jurisdiction and to address the need to preserve and maintain agricultural land uses. The AC designation and underlying coning eneourdges the on -going Improvement of the site for agriculture or agricultural- related facilities and operations. The basic land use designation requires the entire holding be subject to a Specific Plan, which must be prepared at the time of future development, other than agricultural uses, with a maximum overall density of 2.8 dwelling units per acre. One half of the total acreage 1s to be kept In agricultural production under the Specific Plan. Any wetland areas or steep slopes would not be counted for determining the overall development's residential density. While the proposed boundary adjustment could be interpreted to be ad4velopment• under the definition contslned In the certified LCP, the proposed boundary adjustment does not appear to be an appropriate point to require development of the Specific Plan for the entire site. Preparation of the Specific Plan at this point would only increase the pressure for premature development of the site. However, it Is imperative that the Commission's and the County's ability to apply the Agricultural Cropland land use designation not be pre- empted by the approval of the subject boundary adjustment. The proposed baundary adjustment also Includes properties which lie partially within the floodplaln of an unnamed tributary of Encinitas Creek, Since none of the proposed new parcels would lie entirely within the boundaries of the floodplaln, the proposed boundary adjustment mould not in itself result in floodplaln impacts. Similarly, the configuration of the parcels mould not of necessity result In development within the floodplain. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed project IS consistent with the Floodplain A' a CAI ava m� a C� 1 Al raw i 1 i n O M m 2� Order EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 13 of 45 Comment: CATHY -pe^ 6 -99 -274 Page 6 Overlay 2one In the certified LCP. <� . 99 In addition, there is the potential for annexation to the City of Encinitas. While this action would likely be opposed by the landowner, the ability for the City to plan for this area may become crucial, should annexation eventually occur. Pre - determining the land use pattern or pre- empting the ability of the City to apply the existing land use designation could prejudice the ability of the City to effectively plea for this site in its LCP or to plan fur the City's circulation element. For this reason, Special Condition II has been proposed. Special Condition fl acknowledges the existing land use designation, and places the applicants and any potential buyers on notice that the Conelssion Intends to strictly apply the AC land use designation and Specific Plan requirements to all the affected properties at the time of future development, although the Commission is not applying it in conjunction with this permit. In this fashion, the Commission ensures the consistency of the project with the requirements of the certified LCP for the area, while still protecting the interests of the City If the area is ever annexed. Therefore, the Commission finds, as conditioned, the subject development proposal is consistent with the certified County of San Diego LCP and its approval will mot prejudice the ability of the County to implement its LCP. Furthermore, this action will not prejudice any future planning efforts of the neighboring jurisdictions. STANDARD CONDITIONS: I. Not ce of Rece tpt and Acknowledgement. The pemit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the pemittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terns and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. 2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the data on which the Comalssioe voted an the application. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a .reasonable period of tine. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. 3. Compliance. All development must occur in strict compliance with the proposal as set forth below. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Commission approval. 4. jnterorotatton. Any questions of intent or Interpretation of anyy Condition will be rein lvad by the Executive Director or the Comn{sslon. Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 14 of 45 Comment. CATHY - .iiJua -90 648 -214 I Page 7 5. Inspections. The Cosmission staff shall be allowed to inspect the site and the development during construction, subject to 24 -hour advance notice 6. As s I g ament. The permit may be assigned to any Qualified parson, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 7. Terms and Conditions pun w1Th the land. These terns and conditions shall be perpetual, en�the i- ntention of the tom isslon and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessort of the subject property to the ferns and conditions. (e274h) L_ { eee j {I c� I� m Order- Description: 1989.82586 Page 15 of 45 Comment: CATHY lu r� . I' r ac" uwca 91 DOONMRY KDJOBTKMT JUNE 1988 VICINITY IIAP VICIN". MAP NO SCALE .@• IEXHIMT NO. / I i I Ii I Al � i A y� I1� �i Z� 3 f 1 z° Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 16 o /45 Comment CATHY 4F. xHI6IT g5R ��RRRi�Rr1RR� +9s� IP g s 1 d 5� —w--.. V � — bE e' d � i � n N �tl�4 iqa �Y. 9" m �r 4 Order.' EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 17 of 45 Comment. CATHY • ! I (�, . 93 LAW OFFIM OF GERALD DAWSON I.rr 0,100. CwllrOaMU Ines � i` rtur »o »e rim arye„ 1 August 31, 1988 Ivq�v��1U X1111 1 Kr. Paul Webb California Coastal Commission SEP• 11988 1333 Camino Del Rio South CAVOCAMA Since 125 I MAU" COAUNi3iON- Sao Diego, CA 92108 i LAN aaGO COASI pidrncr • Deer Pauli • This is in reference to the emended lenguege respecting the ryryryry Carlton boundary adjustment, B)) omitting the lenguege from the 7 1��I proposed deed restrict,.. raleii rig into whether the reK Action i constituted an lndependant restriction. It vu contenplm it that this issue would be loft unaddressed. It wAs not my intention to •, -agree that the deed restriction operates an an independent l� restriction• but to allow the language of t deed restriction to speak for itself. I �� After mending you the emended language it ol:curred to we that we may be faced with a confusing circumstance as s result of the possible certification by the Commission of the Encinitas LCP. l Although Carltss is in the process of apply ng to LAFCO to delete its property from the Encinitas sphere an a�result of the city's [ I proposed road network (which we see as an�abeolute disaster in �m� terse of continuing to use the land for eg 1cultural purposes). gym. the Carlton land is now wf chlrt ct.a city', sphere, and the city has included it in its general plan. If the Commission certlfias the city's proposed general plan It could be argued that the ` original proposed restriction would ops Fate to subject the Carlton property to this now LCP. Current state law provides [(� that the county is required to contact and leek input from s city aye respecting any development within Its aphsrf, but the city has no i� rfi,� actual power to authoritatively dictate en lend use decision. gar The contradictory positions respecting agr culture taken by the city have destroyed uur confidence in Its commitment to agriculture. Thus, we do not intend to golbeyond current state law and become subject to control by Ithe city through a combination of the now LCP and the p .posed raetr It tlon. Consequently. I have further amended Nm lamgusge of the em+� restriction to make it clear that the re tr ctiom would apply to e new LCP approved by a local agency with a teal land use peru t authority over the property and nat to an L P where we are merely within the sphere of the agency. 't EXHIBIT NO. 3 + APPLICAT rn 2` Order.' EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 18 of 45 Comment CATHY Paul we ►► I •� 94 August ]l, 1988 Page Two Enclosed are two copies of the revised ruFrlctlon, one of which has the now language underlined. { Very truly yours. �-hlD•M aVSOM I CMBsha I ces Chris Calkins Encl. I 9 I 49A Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 19 of 45 Comment: CATHY n - 95 4 ` 1. Future Agri cull urat Converslun. idefurro issuance of thu coastal development perelt. Iho pu r al [tea she 11 rrcord the following rest rlct Ion agnlnst each of In, -I subject prupertion: 1. Peclarant hereby acknosledgun and gives not ice to any prosporti we purchaser, oncumbran or, owner, or occupier of the subject property that So long as the subject proper y la eubjuct to the current provisions of the LCP and the permit Authority of the Commission or a successor agency, the subject property suet satisfy all of th terms, conditions and provisions of the LCP including, but not limited to the Agricultural Cropland /Speclf is Plan requirements. Should the current LCP be emende4 or ■uperceded by a new LCP adopted by the County of Solt Diego or a successor local governmental agency with gctual land use permit authority over the subject property. and certified by the Commiiiion tYia ihs iobject property shall be subject to the terms, conditions, and provisions of the amended or new LCP, 4 successor local governmental agency _1 Lb" actual _Iand use_ -Pere l.t eu[h9rler meens._a _ local ,•guvernme ntal agency .vlth authotLtf to Issue building er6f2 s " -ap pYove auTdlrlAion map zone or rezone lend, ei sue gredi'ag permits, or otherllend wee eppro ve lessor ant- i-tieoedts for use and doe: ,not,incjuda as agency vlJjeh.- merely lies a sphere of t1fluence which includes the subject property. I ' I1. This declaration Is not intended and ohnll not operate as a waiver of any right to challenge the validity of any rescrirliuu. No connrrv.,l lull or open space easement Is created by this duclarutton. - III. The giving of notict with coops t to these matters is not intended to suggest that other land use regulations do not apply to the subject property and any prospective purchaser, encnebrencar, owner,, or occupier of the subject property should not -leek to undortnko any development on tha subject property without obtaining all other required governments[ approvals. IV. This declaration is intended to lend rnd shall be binding upon successors in Internet. ad shall run with the he declarant and its 1 i I , 1 A Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 20 of 45 Comment. CATHY r{� qQ -/E LADERA ASSOCIATE^ INC. EXHIBIT "R" ff 8A T1I5gCOMPANY +� 'rte; REVISED MAY 20, '.:88 I_1)JOB NO. 363 -300 PARCEL 'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A.P.N. 1254-200-31,32 i 254- 201 -16) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. i' EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOX POINT ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7892, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF HILLSIDE ACRES ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 1992, PILED IN THE OFFICE Of COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, NORTH 00.07'11' EAST (RECORD NORTH 00.05.30' EAST) 659.03 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3 NORTH 06.40'00" WEST 1476.92 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST OUARTERI THENCE SOUTH 89 459'42" EAST 127.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °47028• WEST, 419.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A TANGENT 20 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVED NORTHEASTERLY) THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90.00'00' FOR AN ARC OISTANCE OF 31.42 FEETI THENCE SOUTH 89.12'35' EAST 64.91 FRET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A TANGENT 530.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY) THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10- 00'00' FOR A DISTANCE OF 166.50 PEST; THENCE SOUTH 71.12'35' EAST, 33.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A 470.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 92.30'OU', FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 755.78 FEETI THENCE NORTH 16017'25' EAST. 314.78 FOOT TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A 530.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVED SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OP SAID .CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37 °10'10', FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 343.63 FEET) THENCE SOUTH 07 °31'06` EAST, 1,900.00 FOOT MORE OR LESS TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SECTION 3 AND THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID FOX POINT; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY PROLONGATION SOUTH 00 °02'16' WEST, 658.43 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FOX POINT; THENCE WETERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID FOX POINT NORTH 89.51'47" WEST, 1,362.97 FEET (RE -ORB 1,3672.75 FEET) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO THE NORTHERLY 330.00 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 330.00 FEET AND THE NORTHERLY 330.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 330.00 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST SAN BERNARDINO, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. E411b(C "R" Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 21 of 45 Comment CATHY I -�r - 'J'7 LADBRA ASSOCIATE', iNC. CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED MAY 20, 198E JOB NO. 363 -000 PARCEL 'B' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A. .N. #2S4-201-09) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, ',. TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY APPROVED APRIL 19, 1681. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS POLLOWSI COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTERI THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF, NORTH 89 °11'20" WEST 177.34 FEET to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGI THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, NORTH 89.11'20' WBST 253.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00.48'40" EAST 457.00 FEETI THENCE SOUTH 89.11'200 EAST 253.81 FEETI THENCE SOUTH 00 048'40' WEST 457.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. (fI 1 Ai l z 1 A OI AI C' Z �I r" fM Al f'7 , :Z7 Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 22 of 45 Comment: CATHY - 9B LADERA ASSOCIATE, INC. -�` CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED MAY 20, 1988 JOB HO, 363 -300 PARCEL 'C' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A.P.N. T-2-5f---26-F-19 i portion 13) THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 13 ,,.SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY APPROVED APRIL 19, 1881. EXCEPTING THAT PORTION OF SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLWWS, BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTIONI THENCE NORTH 04.52'36" WEST A DISTANCE OF 686.48 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTERI THENCE NORTH 89.56'56' EAST A DISTANCE OF 1311.36 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31 THENCE SOUTH 05.47'30• EAST A DISTANCE OF 689.48 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE COMMON POINT OF SECTIONS 2, 3, 10 AND 117 THENCE SOUTH 89'56'56" NEST A DISTANCE 1322.41 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 3 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. E A Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 23 of 45 Comment. CATHY O EGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 04 652'36' WEST A DISTANCE OF 688.48 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST OUARTERI THENCE NORTH 89 °56'56" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1311.36 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, THENCE SOUTH 05.47'30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 689.50 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE COMMON POINT OF SECTIONS 2. 3, 10 AND 11, THENCE SOUTH B9.56'56" WEST A DISTANCE 1322.41 ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 3 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTBRI THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 02'14'50" WEST .222.23 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 89 °52'17' WEST 1325.52 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINO THEREOF; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 02'01'00' EAST 222.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOPI THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 89.52'17' EAST 1326.41 FEET TO THE POINT OP BEGINNING, Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 24 of 45 Comment. CATHY LADBRA ASSOCIATE � INC. -�. CARLTAS COMPANY ' REVISED MAY 20, 1988 JOB NOI 363 -300 I � r I �a PARCEL 'D' • LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A.P.N. #254-200-4,20,21 L 1254 - 200 -13) ---' (1257- 010 - 01,34,351 C' OF SECTION 31, THE \ \01 THE SOUTHWEST OUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTERI THE NORTHWEST I QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 101 ALL IN TOWNSHIP II 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 NEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED i STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY APPROVED APRIL 19, 1881. ' ALSO THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; jf O EGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 04 652'36' WEST A DISTANCE OF 688.48 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST OUARTERI THENCE NORTH 89 °56'56" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1311.36 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, THENCE SOUTH 05.47'30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 689.50 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE COMMON POINT OF SECTIONS 2. 3, 10 AND 11, THENCE SOUTH B9.56'56" WEST A DISTANCE 1322.41 ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 3 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTBRI THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 02'14'50" WEST .222.23 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 89 °52'17' WEST 1325.52 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINO THEREOF; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 02'01'00' EAST 222.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOPI THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 89.52'17' EAST 1326.41 FEET TO THE POINT OP BEGINNING, Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 24 of 45 Comment. CATHY ,�• LADERA ASSOCIATELI NC. REVISED MAY 20, 1988 PARCEL 'E' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A.P.N. 1257-020-0i) 0 1100 1 CARLTAS COMPANY JOB NO. 363 -300 THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, .'n. TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWSI BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTERI THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 02.111500 WEST 222.23 FEETI THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 89.52'17' WEST 1325.52 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE THEREOF) THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 02.01'00' EAST 222.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOP) THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 89.52'17' EAST 1326.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. i i I Ilji i JZJ' 1' �I �i 10 . m z� Order: EXP- 15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 25 of 45 Comment: CATHY LAORRA ASSOCIATE." INC. �ARLTA9 COMPANY REVISED NAY 30, 1988 JOB NO, 363 -300 PARCEL 'F' LEGAL DESCRIPTION .THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OP 711E NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE NORTHWEST ,QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP. 13 "SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN' THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY APPROVED APRIL 19, 1881. T �j Z' lm Order.' EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 26 of 45 Comment: CATHY LADERA ASSOCIATES' INC. REVISED MAY 20, 1968 (% -10z CARLTAS COMPANY JOB NO, 363 -300 PARCEL 'G' LEGAL DESCRIPTION IA 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - THE NORTHWEST OUARTER OF THE NORTHWE5T QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND 'MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 650.00 FEET OF THE WEST 575.00 FEET. 0 U I r 1 Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 2 7ot45 Comment: CATHY (` -103 • LADERA ASSOCIATE! INC. CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED KAY 20, 1980 JOB NOI 363 -300 I PARCEL 'H' � LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A. _.. -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- r.. THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2,, `- TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE. AND MERIDIAN IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 0 EXCEPT THEREFROM THE SOUTH 560.00 FEET OF THE WEST 622.00 FEET. hI , g �w' 41 n! o� c: , I l' rM a m Order: D( -15-00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 28 of 45 Comment: CATHY 104 - LADERA ASSOCIATE£ INC. ;CARLTAS COMPANY kEVISED MAY 20, 1988 JOB N0, 363 -300 PARCEL 'I' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A.P.N. - - c 7 -040 -24) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - THE SOUTHERLY 560.00 PEET OF THE WESTERLY 622.00 PEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, AND -THE NORTHERLY 450.00 PEET OF THE WESTERLY 575.00 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. i .a �I I� 1 I �I • I i 1 1 � � II1 II in 2" Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989 , 82586 Page 29 of 45 Comment. CATHY ,. LADERA ASSOCIATES INC. CAR4APCOMPANY REVISED MAY 20, 1988 JOB NOI 363 -300 PAGE 1 OF 2 PARCEL 'J' i LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A.P.N. 1255-026--29-, 30) I ss THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, '.GRANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF 0 SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY APPROVED APRIL 19, 1881, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWSz V BEGINNING AT THE CONCRETE MONUMENT DESIGNATING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 21 THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF SOUTH 87.45'03" WEST 1258.60 FEET (RECORD SOUTH 88.39'20' NEST 1259.25 FEET) TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTIONI THENCE ALONG - -` THE WESTERLY LINE THEREOF -SOUTH 4'15'36" EAST (RECORD SOUTH 4 °20'10" EAST) 914.20 PEETI THENCE NORTH 07.45'03" EAST TO A AI POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO DONALD B. AYRES, ET UX, RECORDED APRIL 26, 1955 AS DOCUMENT NO. 54471 IN BOOK 5619, PAGE 125 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGI THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LAND �{ AS FOLLOWS: SOUTH 05 °02'500 EAST TO A TANGENT 538.39 FOOT w, RADIUS CURVE. 197.74 FEET THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 21.02'40 "1 THENCE Y7II TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 26'05'30" EAST 472.90 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LAND AND EASTERLY PROLONGATION I THEREOF NORTH 86'46'00" EAST 1271.76 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF AI THE COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS GREEN VALLEY ROADI THENCE NORTHERLY i ALONG SAID CENTER LINE TO A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 87.45'03• �. FAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGI THENCE SOUTH 87.45103" WEST TO THE TRUE. POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, COMMENCING AT THE CONCRETE MONUMENT WHICH DESIGNATES THE SOUTH �� r QUARTER CORNER OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED SECTION 2, AND MEASURING C NORTH A DISTANCE, OF 996.20 FEET1 THGENCE NORTH 86. 46'00" EAST A rR�T DISTANCE OF 16.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGI THENCE NORTH 455.97 FSETI THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 425.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN ROAD. KNOWN AS THE GREEN VALLEY ROAD1 �•I THENCE SOUTH 4 "30'30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 431.39 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINE? THENCE SOUTH 86.46100" WEST A DISTANCE OF 460.37 �{ FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. T �, ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 60 FEET WIDE, 30 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CEHT8R Li NE I (� 2. Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 30 of 45 Comment. CATHY P •106 LADERA ASSOCIATEt INC. ' -•) CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED MAY 20, 1988 JOB NO. 363 -300 (A.P.N. 4255- 020 -29, 30) PACE 2 OF 2 PARCEL 'J' LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTINUED - - l - - - _ - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 2, DISTANT THEREON, SOUTH 89.49'30• EAST, (RECORD SOUTH "-46-30- EAST) 471.29 FEET FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION, ySAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE WEBTERLY,. THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARING NORTH 88.27'51• WEST 1000.00 FEET PROM SAID POINT, SAID CURVE BEING IN THE CENTER LINE C A 6TRIP OF LAND DESCRIBED IN EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DI BGO POR ROAD SURVEY NO. 682 RECORDED IN BOOR 3485, PAGE 216 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTYI THENC ALONG SAID CENTER LINE AS FOLLOWS, NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE Of 0.28'09' A DISTANCE OF 8.19 FEET, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 1.04'00` EAST 777.41 PEETI THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTER LINE AND CONTINUING NORTH 1'04'00' EAST 192.53 PEEET TO A POINTI THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 1 °04'00' EAST, 113.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING• A RADIUS OF 1000.00 PEETI THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10.45'00• A DISTANCE OF 187.62 PEETI THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 9.41'00" NEST 244.95 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1000.00 PEETI THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5'11100• a distance OI 91.09 PERT TO ITS POINT OF A TANGENCY WITH THE AFORESAID CENTER LINE DESCRIBED IN SAID EASEMENT TO COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, SAID POINT BEING ENGINEER'S STATION 456 + 33.45 P.O.T. ON THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD SURVEY 682. II r� 'f Y� o{ Aj 0 C ZI I� r"' I 0 2' Order. , EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 31 of 45 Comment: CATHY 107 LADERA ASSOCIATES., INC. CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED MAY 20, 1988 JOB 00. 363 -300 PARCEL 'K' LEGAL DESCRIPTION IA 33) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF DP THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 62, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS! BEGINNING AT THE CONCRETE MONUMENT WHICH DESIGNATES THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 2, AND MEASURING NORTH 43 °27'35• EAST A DISTANCE OF 693.75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING ON THE CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS GREEN VALLEY ROAD, AND MEASURING SOUTH 89.091(10• WEST A DISTANCE OF 1118.63 PEETI THENCE NORTH 07.23'00• WEST A DISTANCE OF 137.14 PEETi THENCE ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, TANGENT TO THE LAST MENTIONED BEARING, HAVING A RADIUS OF 608.44 FEET THRU AN ANGLE OP 18.40'30' HAVING A LENGTH OF ARC OF 198.32 PEETI THENCE NORTH 26.05'30• WEST A DISTANCE OF 177.10 FEET! THENCE NORTH 86.46'000 EAST A DISTANCE OF 1271.78 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE SAID GREEN VALLEY ROAD; THE14CE SOUTH 00'06'30• EAST A DISTANCE OP 519.63 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY PER PILE PAGE NO. 155367 RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1970. I �T n Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 32 of 45 Comment. CATHY I• lU0 LADERA ASSOCIATES INC. CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED MAY 20, 1988 JOB NO. 363 -300 PARCEL 'L' LEGAL DESCRIPTION t A_P�07'_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ALL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH MALP OF SECTION 2. AND THE ,NORTH HALF OP SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 NEST, -SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS POLLOWS, COMMENCING AT THE CONCRETE MONUMENT WHICH DESIGNATED THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 11, AND THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 2. AND MEASURING SOUTH 40.44 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST 574.76 FEETI THENCE NORTH 07.25100• WEST 512.17 FCETI THENCE NORTH 88.09100' EAST 754.67 FEET I THENCE SOUTH 532.21 FEET; THENCE NEST 120.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. I QI l� �I Ifs ^^. M/I 0'. C9'I p Q Zi �I +�1 I,A �I 'I Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 33 o145 Comment: CATHY r I �' •,�..• ( 0 -109 1 LADERA ASSOCIATES, INC. CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED MAY 20, 1988 JOB NOI 363 -300 s ,. PARCEL 'M' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A.P.P. 125 — — i 1 57— 10 -03 1 17) ;,ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWSI COMMENCING AT THE CONCRETE MONUMENT WHICH DESIGNATES THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED SECTION AND MEASURING SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 40.44 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGI THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 567.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07.25'00• EAST A DISTANCE OF 398.93 FEBT'I THENCE ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1562.97 FEET, THROUGH AN ARC OF 07'19'18' FOR A LENGTH OF ARC OF 199.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °05'42• EAST A DISTANCE OF 183.54 FEETI THENCE EAST TO THE CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 682 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY SURVEYOR OF SAID COUNTY: THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A LINE WHICH BEARS EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGI THENCE WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO POP. PUBLIC HIGHWAY PER FILE PAGE NO. 155367 RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1970. THE WESTERLY 20.00 FEET HEREOF 16 RESERVED FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES. A' r r ig {0i iII I I 'i Order. E)(P -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 34 of 45 Comment. CATHY Y i LADERA ASSOCIATE% INC. {" lI 0 -� CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED PAY 20, 1980 JOB NO. 363 -300 PARCEL 'N' LEGAL DESCRIPTION - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - (A- - 1 57 -040- -�- - - _ _ - - A PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 11, „TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE :AND MERIDIAN, IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY APPROVED APRIL 19, 1081, AND PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, COMMENCING AT THE CONCRETE MONUMENT WHICH DESIGNATES THE NORTH OUARTER CORNER OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED SECTION AND MEASURING SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 818.74 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING? THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 349.27 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS THE GREEN VALLEY ROAD1 THENCE SOUTH 01.24'34• EAST A DISTANCE OF 455.56 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS 36.96 PEET NORTHERLY FROM AND MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SECTION Ili THENCE SOUTH 89.51136• WEST A DISTANCE OF 869.74 PEET ALONG A LINE 36.96 FEET NORTHERLY PROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED NORTH HALF OF NORTH HALF Of SECTION 11, THENCE NORTH 00 °05'42' WEST A DISTANCE OF 457.55 FEET; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 510.02 PEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FUR PUBLIC HIGHWAY PER PILE PAGE NO. 155367 RECORDED AUGUST 27, 1970. I (f!j ^�1 •/ �II, V k� l t I i low. fvl �I 11 I Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 35 of 45 Comment. CATHY N • +.'. ,r LADERA ASSOCIATES4 'INC. I I Z '' CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED MAY 20, 1900 JOB NOI 363 -300 PAGE l OF 2 PARCEL 'O' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A.P.N. jam$ =T�y 'f�J_040 -1) ALL THAT PORTION OF SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 2, AND ALL THAT PORTION OF NORTH HALF OF NORTH HALF OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIPONRIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY APPROVED APRIL 19, 1881 AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CONCRETE MONUMENT DESIGNATING THE CENTER OF SECTION 2, AND MEASURING SOUTH 08 °39'20• WEST A DISTANCE OF 1259.25 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 2, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OP THE EAST HALF OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21 THENCE SOUTH 04.20'10' EAST A DISTANCE OF 2003.97 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY HALP OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2 TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 21 THENCE SOUTH 00.02'03• EAST A DISTANCE UP 1303.46 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF NORTHEAST QUARTER OF NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11 TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID QUARTER SECTIONI THENCE NORTH 89 °51'364 EAST A DISTANCE OF 1579.46 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 11 TO THE CENTER LINE OF WHAT IS KNOWN AS GREEN VALLEY ROADI THENCE NORTH 01 °24'34• WEST A DISTANCE OF 36.96 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINEI THENCE SOUTH 89 °51'36" WEST A DISTANCE OF 869.74 FEET ALONG A LINE 36.96 FEET NORTHERLY FROM AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED NORTH HALF OF NORTH HALF OF SECTION 11, THENCE NORTH 00.05'42" WEST A DISTANCE OF 641.09 PEETI THENCE ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST TANGENT TO THE LAST MENTIONED BEARING, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1562.97 FEET THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 07.19'16• FOR A LENGTH OF ARC OF 199.73 PEETI THENCE NORTH 07 *25100' WEST A DISTANCE OF 3048.24 PEETI THENCE ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST TANGENT TO THE LAST MENTIONED BEARING AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 608.44 PEET THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 18 °40'30" FOR A LENGTH OF ARC OF 195.32 FEETI THNNCE NORTH 26.05'30• WEST A DISTANCE OF 650.00 PEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE EAST TANGENT TO THE LAST MENTIONED BEARING HAVING A RADIUS OF 538.39 PEET THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 21.02'40• FOR A LENGTH OF ARC OF 197.74 FEETI THENCE NORTH 05.028500 WEST A DISTANCE OF 457.66 FEET, THENCE NORTH 87.22'50^ EAST A DISTANCE OF 1486.49 PEEP TO THE CENTER LINE OF GREEN VALLEY ROAD1 THENCE NORTH 04 036'20' WEST A DISTANCE OF 469.73 PEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, THENCE ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE EAST, TANGENT TO THE LAST MENTIONED BEARING AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 259.41 FEET; THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 21049'100 FOR A LENGTH OF ARC OF 98.79 PEETI THENCE NORTH 17'12'50' EAST A Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 36 of 45 Comment: CATHY M, ••• LADERA ASSOCIATE:. INC. (I lI?' '} CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED MAY 20, 1988 JOB NOI 163 -300 (A.P.N. 1255- 020 -12 4 257- 040 -01) PAGE 2 OF 2 PARCEL 'O' LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTI LTE0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — DISTANCE OF 90.89 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINEI THENCE SOUTH 88.39'20• WEST A DISTANCE OF 564.07 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE POLLOWTNG DESCRIBED LINEe BEGINNING AT THE CONCRETE MONUMENT DESIGNATING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 21 THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF SOUTH 07.45'030 WEST 1258.60 FEET (RECORD SOUTH 88.39'20- WEST 1259.25 FEET) TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2) THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 04 15'36' EAST (RECORD SOUTH 04.20'10• EAST) 914.20 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGI THENCE NORTH 87.45'03' EAST TO AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO CARLTAS COMPANY, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 25, 1962 AS FILE NO. 164673 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. I A Order EXP- 15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 37 of 45 Comment: CATHY --a/ �i LADERA ASSOCIATEi INC. 113 CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED MAY 20, 1988 JOB Not 363 -300 PAGE 1 OF 2 PARCEL 'P' LEGAL DESCRIPTION -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST ,QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY APPROVED APRIL 19, 1881, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 00.54'00• EAST 1180.20 FEET PROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOP, SAID POINT BEING ALSO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO T. WEBER AND LYDIA WEBER. BY DEED DATED JUNE 19, 1929. AND RECORDED IN BOOK 1650, PAGE 424 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTYI THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE LAND SO CONVEYED TO SAID WEBERS, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: SOUTH 89.43100" EAST 100 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18.45'00' EAST 55 PEETI THENCE NORTH 71.15'00• EAST 164.85 PEST; THENCE NORTH 41.08'00• EAST 155.70 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID WEBER's LAND; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY LINE, NORTH 35. 45'00' EAST 521.94 FEET TO THE HOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO HERBERT G. STEWART BY DEED DATED APRIL 16, 1929 AND RECORDED IN BOOK 1615, PAGE 349 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 60 °00'00• EAST ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE [.AND SO CONVEYED TO SAID STEWART 56.16 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO LESTER H. SMITH AND KATHERINE A. SMITH BY DEED DATED MAY 3, 1930 AND RECORDED IN BOOK 1772, PAGE 150 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTYI THENCE SOUTH 01.02'00• WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND 50 CONVEYED TO SAID SMITH AND THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID WESTERLY LINE, 813.26 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SALO SECTION; THENCE NORTH 89'43'00' WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 714.70 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST OUARTERI THENCE NORTH 00.54'00" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER 135 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED AUGUST 30, 1962 hS PILE NO. 149821 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND, LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINEI 1� 7�0 ii , 6• i zi i i' (v t4 All A �I m 5L Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 38 of 45 Comment CATHY LADERA ASSOCIATE) INC. 114 CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED MAY 20, 1908 JOB NOi 363 -300 (A.P.N. 1256- 330 -23) PAGE 2 OF 2 PARCEL 'P' LEGAL DESCRIPTION ONE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, SAID CORNER BEING MARKED BY A 1/2' IRON PIPE HAVING COORDINATES X - 1,682,93..60 FEET AND Y - 323,219.75 FEETI THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 10, NORTH 89 °32'26" WEST 493.86 FEETI THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 17.34'58• WEST 720.85 FEETI THENCE NORTH 15 °56'28' WEST 250.20 FEETI THENCE NORTH 13.39'00• WEST 300.00 FEETI THENCE NORTH 20.10'11' WEST 352.28 FEETI THENCE NORTH 02.20'200 WEST 119.26 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE UNION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED JANUARY 9, 1952 IN BOOK 4339, PAGE 224 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, PILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTYI THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINES OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY[ THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL CONVEYED TO UNION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, SOUTH 41 °38'57' WEST 149.62 FEETI SOUTH 71045'57" WEST 164.85 FEETI SOUTH 19 615'570 WEST 55.00 FEETI NORTH 89.12'03' WEST 100.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 10 DISTANCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 00.13'48" WEST 1448.25 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SAID CORNER BEING MARKED BY A 1 1/2' IRON PIPE. QI �1 t t I f t Z!. �I PI Z� Order.' EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 39 of 45 Comment. CATHY i LAD8RA A6SOCIATB.. INC. (, 115 REVISED MAY 20, 1988 PARCEL '0' LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( A773Z6 ) CARLTAS COMPANY JOB NO1 363 -300 THAT PORTION OP THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER 'OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS POLLDWSI BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 101 THENCE NORTH 1.021001 EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST OUARTER, 296.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO CEOFPREY HOLT AND RUTH HOLT, DATED JANUARY 20, 1944 AND RECORDED IN BOOK 1626, PAGE 92 OP OFFICIAL RECORDSI THENCE NORTH 89.43'00' WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID HOLT's LAND, 330.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOPI THENCE NORTH 1.02'00 EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE LAND SO CONVEYED TO SAID HOLT, RECORDED JUNE 20, 1942 IN BOOK 1350 PAGE 439 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OP SAID COUNTY A DISTANCE OF 232.00 PEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LAST MENTIONED DEED, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO CHARLES E. POHL, ET AL, RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1942 IN BOOK 1444, PACE 8 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 89.43100• WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF POHL'S LAND 330.00 PERT TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WEST LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DECREE OP QUIET TITLE ISSUED OUT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ENTITLED SAN DIEGUITO IRRIGATION DISTRICT VS. SHERP., A CERTIFIED COPY OF SAID DECREE BEING RECORDED IN BOOK 1325, PAGE 203 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 1 °02'00', WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE LANL DESCRIBED IN SAID DECREE 528.00 FEET TO THE SOHTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTERI THENCE SOUTH 89.43'00" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 660.00 PErT TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. • t • Y Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 40 of 45 Comment. CATHY 116 !~• "', LADERA ASSOCIATEL INC. REVISED MAY 20, 1986 PARCEL 'R' LEGAL DESCRIPTION CARLTAS COMPANY JOB NO: 363 -300 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER !OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO U.S. GOVERNMENT SURVEY, APPROVED APRIL 19, 1881, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 1.02'00' EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER 396.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO GEOFFREY HOLT ET UX JUNE 20, 1942 IN BOOK 1350, PAGE 439 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BBGINNING; THENCE NORTH 09 °43'00" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID HOLT'S LAND, AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SOUTHWEST QUARTr- 330.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 1 °02'00• WEST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER 100 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89.43'00' EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER 330.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE NORTH 1 °02'00^ EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 100 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Order. EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 41 of 45 Comment CATHY .• 117 LADERA ASSOCIATE',. INC. . COMPANY JOB Not RBVIS¢0 MAY 20, 1988 JOB NO1 363 -300 PARCEL 'S' LEGAL DESCRIPTION N 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -3- - 181 _ - - - _ - - _ - - - THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS POLLOWSt ACCORDING TO U.S. GOVERNMENT SURVEY, APPROVED APRIL 19, 18811 COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SOUTHWEST QUARTERI THENCE NORTH 1 °02'00' EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER 396 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINCI THENCE NORTH 1.02'00" EAST ALONG SAID PAST LINE 132 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'43'00' WEST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 330.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 °02'00" WEST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 132.00 PEETI THENCE SOUTH 09.43'00' EAST 330.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. f f It I CIii �a �I i it li mi D1 I OI A'. 1 OM AN its 110 �I�- I 2. * Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 42 of 45 Comment CATHY LADERA ASSOCIATE. INC. 118 CAALTAS COMPANY REVISED MAY 20, 1988 JOB N04 363 -300 PARCEL 'T' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A.P.N. 4 6- 3- c 37) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIPORNIA. EXCEPTING HOWEVER, ANY PUBLIC ROADWAYS OR HIGHWAYS TRAVERSING SAID PREMISES OR ANY PART THEREOF. EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY HERETOFORE SOLD BY THE GRANTORS, WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OP SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT SURVEY ON RECORD WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTIO14 101 THENCE SOUTH 00 °43100' WEST ALONG THE WEST LIMB OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 568.5) FEET1 THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE NORTH 89.46130• EAST 539.82 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING) THENCE SOUTH 76 °41.16' EAST 163.62 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00.10'50' PAST 01.45 FEET1 THCNCE SOUTH 89 °47133" EAST 60.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH L5.15'51' WEST 96.33 FEET4 THENCE NORTH 3.55'53' WEST 119.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89.16109' WEST 159.43 FSETI THENCE SOUTH 06 °02'36° WEST 255.22 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY AND ROAD PURPOSES OVER A 20.00 FOOT STRIP OF LAND, 10.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE LINE DESCRIRED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER Of SAID SECTION 101 THENCE SOUTH 00.43'00' WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTI:BAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER 568.51 FEET1 THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE NORTH 89 °46'30° EAST 44.03 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAXONY ROAD AS SHOWN ON ROAD SURVEY MAP NO. 700, SAID POINT BEING ALSO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING WORTH 89 °46'30' EAST 495.52 FEET. I Al Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description 1989.82586 Page 43 of 45 Comment: CATHY r •• LADBRA ASSOCIATE, INC. ' 119 REVISSO MAY 20, 1988 PARCEL 'U' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A.P.N. 1256-330-3'6) CARLTAS COMPANY JOB NOi 363 -300 A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT SURVEY ON RECORD WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWSI BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID 3ECTION 101 THENCE SOUTH 00 043'00" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 560.51 FEETI THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE NORTH 89'46'30" EAST, 539.82 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGI THENCE SOUTH 76.41'16• EAST, 163.62 FEETI THENCE NORTH 0.10'50" EAST, 81.45 FEETI THENCE SOUTH 89 °47'33" EAST, 60.37 FEETI THENCE NORTH 15 °15'51" WEST, 96.33 FEETI THENCE NORTH 3.55'53" WEST, 119.64 FEETI THENCE SOUTH 89 °16'09" WEST, 159.43 PEETI THENCE SOUTH 6.02'36 WEST, 255.22 PEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY AND ROAD PURPOSES OVER A 20.00 FOOT STRIP OF LAND, 10.00 PEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE LINE DESCRIBED AS POLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE SOUTH 00.43'00• WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEST QUARTER, 568.51 PE8TI THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE NORTH 89.46'30' PAST, 44.03 PEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAXONY ROAD AS SHOWN ON ROAD SURVEY MAP NO. 700, SAID POINT BEING - ALSO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGI THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89.46'300 EAST 495,52 FEET. 4 a T Z Y �1 i aj �I `M, 2.� Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description: 1989.82586 Page 44 of 45 Comment. CATHY _..rr c ' (` .I20 •F� Y• %•� LADERA ASSOCIATE.. INC. 0, CARLTAS COMPANY REVISED APRIL 15, 1906 JOB NO. 363 -300 PARCEL .V, LEGAL DESCRIPTION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. a� irugyy.p�` I A, • J. I�I� i� IZ O' �I I rl w Order: EXP -15- 00013673 Description. 1989.82586 Page 45 or 45 Comment: CATHY (A pp RECORDING RE _ .ED BY AND, WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 DOC 4 2001- 02-10697 APR 06. ^001 4:11 OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SNITN, COUNTY RECORDER FEES, 23.00 r' f �� " ENCROACHMENT MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL COVENANT �-fLOf ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. 6538PE K1 e) �/- ae4-SMUv A.P.N.: 257- 040 -46 -00 As encroachment permit is hereby granted to the Permittee designated in paragraph one, Attachment "A," as the owner of the Benefitted Property described in paragraph two, Attachment "A," to encroach upon City Property described in paragraph three, Attachment "A," as detailed in the diagram, Attachment "B." Attachments "All and "B" are hereby incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth at length. In consideration of the issuance of this encroachment permit, Permittee hereby covenants and agrees, for the benefit of the City, as follows: 1. This covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumberancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees, and assigns of the respective parties. 2. Permittee shall use and occupy the City Property only in the manner and for the purposes described in paragraph four, Attachment "A." 3. By accepting the benefits herein, Permittee acknowledges title to the City Property to be in the City and waives all right to contest that title. 4. The term of the encroachment permit is indefinite and may be revoked by the City and abandoned by Permittee at any time. The City shall mail written notice of 'revocation to Permittee, addressed to the Benefitted Property which shall set forth the date upon which the benefits of encroachment permit are to cease. 5. City is entitled to remove all or a portion of the improvements constructed by Permittee in order to repair, replace, or install public improvements. City shall have no obligation to pay for or restore Permittee's improvements. 6. Permittee agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against all claims, demands, costs, losses, damages, injuries, litigation, and liability arising out of or related to the use, construction, encroachment or maintenance to be done by the Permittee or Permittee's agents, employees or contractors on City Property. TF /04 /PW4- 206wp5.bk (1- 04 -96) PM OeCny NATIONAL BANK (X]CITY NATIONAL BANK INTERNATIONAL DEPT. 606 SOUTH OLIVE STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 SWIFT ADDRESS:CINAUS6L TEL No.(213) 347 -2300 FAX No.(213) 347 -2327 ISSUE DATE: 12/06/2000 [ ]CITY NATIONAL BANK INTERNATIONAL DEPT. STE 300 351 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 TLX No. 825717 TLX No. 6771223 TEL No. (415) 576 -2700 FAX No. (415) 362 -4549 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 001206.OD.1400 BENEFICIARY: CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. VULCAN ENCINITAS, CA 92024 APPLICANT: ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC 10679 WESTVIEW PARKWAY SAN DIEGO, CA 92126 AMOUNT: USD 90,003.40 NINETY THOUSAND THREE 40/100 U.S. DOLLARS EXPIRY DATE AND PLACE: 12/01/2001 ISSUING BANK, INTL DEPT. GENTLEMEN: WE HEREBY ESTABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IN YOUR FAVOR AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT BY YOUR DRAFT(S) AT SIGHT DRAWN ON CITY NATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND ACCOMPANIED BY DOCUMENTS AS SPECIFIED BELOW: 1. THIS ORIGINAL STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT, AND AMENDMENT(S), IF ANY. 2. BENEFICIARY'S SIGNED AND DATED STATEMENT WORDED AS FOLLOWS: "I, (NAME OF SIGNER), AN AUTHORIZED SIGNER OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, CERTIFY THAT ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE PERMIT NO. 6538 -6 ISSUED BY THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF GARDEN VIEW AND VIA CANTEBRIA, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA." EACH DRAFT MUST STATE "DRAWN UNDER CREDIT NO. 001206.OD.1400 OF CITY NATIONAL BANK, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA." WE HEREBY ENGAGE WITH YOU THAT ALL DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS CREDIT SHALL BE DULY HONORED IF PRESENTED FOR PAYMENT AT THE OFFICE OF CITY NATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, 606 SOUTH OLIVE STREET, SUITE 300, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90014 ON OR BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS CREDIT. EXCEPT SO FAR AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY STATED, THIS CREDIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDBY PRACTICES 1998 ( "ISP98 "), INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION NO. 590. AUTHORJZZD SIGNATURE TO MAN 'UEN VICE PRESIDENT AUT4CIRIZED S NATURE CHA14JYUK WAH WONG ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT CITY OF ENCINITAS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SECURITY OBLIGATION AGREEMENT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /we Encinitas Ranch Apartments, L.L.C., Principal, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Encinitas, a municipal corporation, in the County of San Diego, State of California, in the sum of four hundred fift -two thousa four h ed twent -n ($ 452,429.00 ) in the form of and ash/ oc/ /assi n on deposit with the City Finance Officer Recei ) and to be held by it until this obligation becomes void a f any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by the City of Encinitas to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provisions recited hereinafter. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known as Poinsettia Ridge Apts, in accordance with En ineering Permit No. 6538GI PE _ dated CV e and is required by the City Code to give a security to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall be conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Engineering Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the ordinances and standards of the City of Encinitas. ne 6 00 00 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this A- day of {z) = Prin al u �, Eui'r�cfi�c Dr 44,(1; Business Address BO /03 /PW1 -21wp5 8 (01/18/93 -11) CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of — ajl d J1 Q ��y ss On � U • A • U) , before me, Date personally appeared personally known to me L'i proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persor-W whose name(4- is /ar+a- subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /sdiAhe"xecuted the same in his /W* /their- authorized capacity(iftls and that by his /1-iii aelF KIMBERLY M. JOKEs signature(*-on the instrument the person4�,or 1178371 the entity upon behalf of which the persoMby cr,: ' r -Ac —coin f ,::,r.,r,nca„My acted, executed the instrument. I cam,. Evian My s. Xol Eff WITNESS my hand and official seal. Place Notary Seal Above Sg ure of Notary P Ullc OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached ocumen Y Title or Typeycument L Q 'YS+Yr C601A t Document Date: Number of P es: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: - Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ❑ Individual Top or mvmb here ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — L l Limited Ll General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: ® 1 NT Natal Notary A oGdleb • 9350 De Solo Ave, P 0 Bo+ 7402 - Chatsworth. CA 91313 -2402 Proo No 5901 Reorder Call Tdl -Free 1 400-876 M27 American Motor! ) Insurance Compa r KemPee. FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULLY EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 986 068 00 Premium (Two Years) : $5,400.00 SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Encinitas Ranch Apartments, LLC, as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Thirteen & 60 /100ths DOLLARS (5360,013.60), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a contract/agreement, dated 00/00/00, with the Obligee to do and perform the following work; to wit: Gradine - Poinsettia Ridee Apartments NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALED, DATED: November 30, 2000 �} prich Apartments, LLC / (Principal) By American Motorists Insurance Company (� �A 0 (Surety) By: (/I h1, KeAna D. Conrad, Attorney In Fact DEC 01 2000 Subdivision Perfomrance Bond - 08- 25- 99.dot DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: m LOU JONES & ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 . FAX (323) 256 -7218 Subdivision Perfomrance Bond - 08- 25- 99.dot CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Los Angeles On NOV 3 0 2000 C. Clarkson NAME personally appeared KeAna D. Conrad NAME OF SIGNER ®Personally known to me - OR -❑ •we ww awwu e...wws e�w. w. ♦eeelNllll�w .. ,Il on G n Notary Public TITLE OF OFFICER proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. v 44S�SQATURE OF NOTARY) OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITI'I IESI American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Companv Lumbermen Mutual Casualty Company _.J.ou Jones & Associates DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE IVEMPER. Home Office: Long Grove. IL 60049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Krow All Men By These Prosenis: That the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company. the American Motorists Insurance Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutua• Insurance Company, corporations Organized and existing under the laws of the Slate of Illnols, having their principal office in Long Grove Illinois, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the 'Company") do hereby appoint KeAna D. Conrad of Los Angeles, Callfomia""" " " " " " " "' their true and lawful agent(s) and altomey(s )4n -fact, to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning vAth the date of issuance of this power and ending on the date specified below, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as their act and deed: Any and all bonds and undertakings provided the amount of no one bond or undertaking exceeds ONE MILLION DOLLARS (51,000, 000. 00)....«».......»». . »...«. » «. « »...« « .............. EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORfTY Is granted to make, execute, seal and deliver arty bond Or undertaking which guarantees the payment or - collection of any promissory note. check, draft or letter of credit. This authority does not permit the same obligation to be split Into two or more bonds In order to bring each such band within the dollar limit of authority as set forth heroin. This appointment may be revoked at any time by the Company. The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as binding upon the said Company as fully and amply to all intents and purposes, as If this same had been duly executed and adorowdedged by their regularly elected officers at their principal office in Long Grove. Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF December 31, 2001 This Power of Attorney is executed by authority of resaludona adopted by the Executive Committees of the Boards of Directors of the Company on February 23, 1988 at Chicago, Illinois, true and accurate oopies of which are hereinafter set firth and are hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being In Aril force and effect 'VOTED. That the Chairman of the Board, the President or any Vice PresidenL or their appointees designated in willing and filed with the Secretary, or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attomeysan -fad and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of Indemnity and other writings, obligatory In the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process.' This Power of Attorney is signed, sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Boards of Directors of the Company at a meeting duty called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: "VOTED. That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President any Vloe President or their appointees designated In writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company. and cerdficadorts by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney or bard executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which It is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company.' In Testimony Whereof, the Company has caused this Instrument to be signed and their corporate seals to be affixed by their authorized officer, this July 7, 2000. Attested and Certified: Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company e �au�u _Ica PL— Robert 1 P. Hanes. Secretary by J. S. Kemper, III, Exec.Vlce President STATE OF ILLINOIS SS COUNTY OF LAKE I. Irene Klewer, a Notary Public, do hereby certify Vint J. S. Kemper, III and Robert P. Hames personalty knovn to me to be the same persona whose names are respectively as Exec. Nee President and Secretary of the Lumbernens Mutual Casualty Company, the A iedcan Motorists Insurance Company. and the American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, Corporations organized and exIsting under the laws of the Stale of Illinois. subscribed to the foregoing Instrument, appeared before me this day In person and severally acknowledged that they being [hereunto duty authorized signed, sealed with the corporate seals and delivered the said Instrument as the free and voluntary act of said corporations and as their own free and voluntary acts for the uses and purposes "rain set forth. My commission expires 1 -213-02 CERTIFICATION AAAAAAAAAAAAA f 'OFFICIAL SEAL' ► t Irene nlrwr ► f r cry ruer N, stale of iiemis t► f ay crnvea agrw u.n W. artrz ► VTTTTVTTTTTTT Irene Klewer, Notary Public I, J.K. Conway, Corporate Secretary of the Lumberman Mutual Casualty Company, the American Motorists Insurance Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, do hereby certify that Oe attached Power of Attorney dated July 7, 2000 on behalf of the person(s) as listed above Is a true and correct copy and that the same has been in full force and effect since the date thereof and Is In full force and effed on the data of this certificate; and I do fur0ler cer fy Out the said J. S. Karrpar, III and Robert P. Hames, who executed Ora Power of Al2ortey as ExecuOve Vice President and Secretary respectsvisly were on Ole dab of tM exiwOon of the aaadtad Power of All rney` Die duty elected Executive Vice Resident and Secretary, of tie Lunberme s MuluW Castnity Company, Ole Arsrlcan Motorists In amm rroa Company, and Be American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company. . IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affbted the corporate seal of the Lumbermen Multual Casualty CmrgmW. the American Motorists Insurance Company. and time American Manufaduron Mutual Insurance Cornparry on Oils eK tr i�'i4 eea n ol.rru. J. K. Cornvay, Corporate Secretary This Power of Attorney antib the ads of Oloee named tilwain to the bonds and undertakings specifically named therein and they have no auOlority, to bind the Company except In the manner and to the extent herein stated. FK 0782 5-913 Power of Anomey - Term Printed In U.SA CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California y,� 1 XM ss. Count of SJ I On ; 7 111, (5Q� , before me, Dale personally appeared K7k�y M. Jom � -Dt °+c— Cdonllp an r ln..r. c",* .MV Goan EITFes MW 6. Eql 3gp$rsonally known to me I proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personal) whose name(aB is /am subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /sWaithEKexecuted the same in his /heNtioiiir authorized capacity(ieo, and that by his /hefAheiu signature(§] on the instrument the person(], or the entity upon behalf of which the persor;ej, acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. 1` Place Notary Seal AMve sgrl/1 cd Notary Public OPTIO AL (\ Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer— Title(s): ❑ Partner — D Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER LN ® 1997 Natroral Noary Association • 9350 De Sato Ave.. PO Box 2402 - Cbalsw , CA 91313 -2402 Prod No 5907 Reorder Call ToMFree 1 IMI -87 -6827 American N o ori*s nsurance Comp IVEMPeR. FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULL Y EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 986 069 00 Premium (Two Years) : $100.00 SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Encinitas Ranch Apartments, LLC, as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California as Surety, are held and fumly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Two Thousand Four Hundred Twelve & 00 /100ths DOLLARS ($2,412.00), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a contract/agreement, dated _, with the Obligee to do and perform the following work; to wit: Permanent Encroachment - Poinsettia Ridee Apartments NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALER, DAVD: Digvembcr 30, 2000 T::�� LC Ameri can Motorists Insurance Company ap (Surety) It By: By � C�A/ KeAna D. Conrad, Attomey In Fact DEC 0 7 2000 Subdivision Performance Bond - 08- 25- 99.dot DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO In LOU JONES & ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 . FAX (323) 256 -7218 Subdivision Performance Bond - 08- 25- 99.dot CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County Of Los Angeles On NOV ? C :Iq6 C. Clarkson Notary Public NAME TITLE OF OFFICER personally appeared KeAna D. Conrad NAME OF SIGNER ®Personally known to me - OR -❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. - WITNESS my hand and official seal. (S f4ATURE OF NOTARY) OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IESI American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company Lumbcrmens Mutual Casualty Company Lou Jones d Associates DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES NOvso= DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE INEMPER. Home Office: Long Grove. IL 60049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Krow All Men By These Presents: Tnat the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, the American Motorists Insurance Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutua- Insurance Company, corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illnois, having their principal office in Long Grove. Illinois, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the 'Company") do hereby appoint KeAna D. Conrad of Los Angeles, California '•'"•"•••••••••• "' their true and lawful agent(s) and altomey(s)-in -fact, to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the data of issuance of this power and ending on the date specified below, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as their act and deed: Any and all bonds and undertakings provided the amount of no one bond or undertaking exceeds ONE MILLION DOLLARS (51,000, 000.00)""......••'•••""" ""••«».»». «.»..».......... EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY Is granted to make, execute, sent and d*Ww any bond or undertaking which guarantees the payment or - eallecdon of any promissory note, deck, draft or letter of Credit. This authority does riot pemYt the same obligation to be split Into two or more bonds In order to bring each such bond within the dollar limll of authority as set forth herein. . This appointment may be revoked at any if" by the Company. The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as bYMkhg upon the' saki Company as fully and ampty to all intents and purposes. w If the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by their regularly elected officers at their principal office in Long Grove, Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF December 31. 2001 This Power of Attorney Is executed by authority of resolutions adopted by On Executve Committees of the Boards of Directors of the Company on FebnAvy 23, 19M at Chicago. INrwls, true and accurate copies of which are hereinafter set forth and are hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being In fug force and effect: 'VOTED. That the Chalmman of the Board. the President, or any Vice President, or their appointees designated In writing and filed with the Secretary. or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attomeys- ln-fac and to autlwrtze them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, aonlraets of Indemnity and other writings, obligatory In the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process.' This Paver of Attorney is signed, sealed and cerdfled by farsintile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Boards of Directors of the Company at a meeting duty called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: "VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice President, a their appointees designated In writing and flied with the Secretary. and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company. and certilicadons by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of atbmey or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and cerdfled with respect to any bond or undertaking to which It U attached. shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company.' In Testimony Whereof, the Company has caused this Instrument to be signed and their corporate seals to be affixed by their authorized officers, this July 7, 2000. Attested and Certified: x rtalrl C vV{K Y .r.`• �P Robert P. Hames, Secretary by Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company mow. Y 1Y/r■ ■e Yr11M -1 S lrwp = J. S. Kemper, 111, F-xec.Vlce President STATE OF ILLINOIS SS COUNTY OF LAKE h, Irene Klewer, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that J. S. Kemper, III and Roben P. Haines personally known to me to be the same parsons .vnose names are nspecuvely as Exec. Vice President and Secretary of the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, the Amrlcan Motorists insurance Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, Corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of Itlinps, subscnbed to the foregoing Instrument, appeared before me this day In parson and severally acknowledged that they being thereunto duty authorized signed, sealed with the corporate seals and delivered the said Instrument as the free and voluntary act of said corporations and as U+ev own free and voluntary acts for the uses and purposes therein set forth. My commission axplres 1 -25-02 CERTIFICATION AAAAAAAAAAAAA 1 'OFFICIAL 91 ► 1 IrenelVewer ► the" PUNW, state •rl Orient ► ay G '.. err. JV a. a.r ► ♦yyvyvvv►vvv♦ Irene )Qewer, Notary Public I, J Conway, Corporate Secretary of the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, the American Motorists Insurance Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, do hereby certify that Cie attached Power of Attorney dated July 7, 2100 on behalf of the persons) as listed above Is a true and correct copy and that the same has been In full force and effect since Cie date thereof and Is In full force and effect on the dale of " ceall ate; and I do further certify that the said J. S. Kemper, III and Robert P. Harms, who executed Che Power of Attonwy at Exeartive Vice President and Senstary respecflvety wars on IM date of IN eswwtlon of"attached Power of Attamey . the duty elected Exeartive We President and Secretary of the Wnbemwu Mutual Caxdb Company. the American Motorists Insu once - Conhpany, and the American Manubcturen Mutual insurance Company. . IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the Lumbemmne Mutual Casualty Company, the American Motorists Insurance Ccrrpany, and the American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company on CJs 68. eR,�C-rv^7 J. K. Cortway. Corporate Secretary This Power of Attorney Grits tie acts of those named therein to the bonds and undertakings spedllply named therein and they have no authority to blind the Company except In the manner and to the extent herein stated. FK 0362 6-96 Power of Attorney - Term Printed In U.SA CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of ss. �ti+� � f e� � J On 2 before me, V'rlh Dale ` ` Nare. linantieVA, personally appeared 9. rsonally known to me proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person( whose names) is /,W_ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /sheAhey- executed the same in hisibwgheiv authorized capacity(i&S�, and that by his /hesliheic_ signature(ar on the instrument the person(4 or IfIrA9ERly M. JONES the entity upon behalf of which the person *j �Y„ a 1129�n Y P P 4�L elacted, executed the instrument. ".3n rvti Candy y colrrn. Emem Mar a, amt WITNESS my hand and official seal. Place Notary Seal Af, ve 5 re of Notary P is OPTIOMAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: CJ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner , Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: __ RIGNT THUMBPRINT of SIGNER ( 1 99] National Notary Assdaaaoo - 9350 De Solo Ave PO Boa 2402 • C11aI5wooh. CA 91313 2402 Prod No 5907 Reorder. Call Tod Free 1,800$]6 -682] 12/07/00 THU 08:50 FAX CITY NATIONAL BK L.A a002 nOCITY NATUONAI BANK [X]CITY NATIONAL BANK [ ]CITY NATIONAL BANK INTERNATIONAL DEPT. INTERNATIONAL DEPT. 606 SOUT -.I OLIVE STREET, STE 300 351 CALIFORNIA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 SWIFT ADURESS:CINAUSfiL TLX No. 825717 TLX No. 6771223 _ TEL No.(213) 347 -2300 TEL No. (415) 576 -2700 FAX No. (:!n) 347 -2327 FAX No. (415) 362 -4549 ISSUE DATE: 12/06/2000 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 001206.OD.1400 BENEFICIARY: CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. VULCAN ENCINITAS, CA 92024 APPLICANT: ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC IENGINEERING 10679 WESTVIEW PARKWAY SAN DIEGO, CA 92126 DEC 0 7 20O AMOUNT: USD 90, 003.40 SERVICI NINETY THOUSAND THREE 40/100 U.S. DOLLARS TY OF ENCINfTAS EXPIRY DATE AND PLACE: 12/01/2001 ISSUING BANK, INTL DEPT. GENTLEMEN: 0 WE HEREBY ESTABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IN YOUR FAVOR P,VAILABLE FOR PAYMENT BY YOUR DRAFT(S) AT SIGHT DRAWN ON CITY NATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND ACCOMPANIED BY DOCUMENTS AS SPECIFIED BELOW: 1. THIS ORIGINAL STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT, AND AMENDMENT(S), IF ANY. i 2. BENEFICI'ARY'S SIGNED AND DATED STATEMENT WORDED AS FOLLOWS: "I, (NAME OF SIGNER), AN AUTHORIZED SIGNER OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, CEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, CERTIFY THAT ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE PERMIT NO, 6538 -6 ISSUED BY THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY' LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF GARDEN VIEW AND VIA CANTF.BRIA, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA." EACH DRAFT MUST STATE "DRAWN UNDER CREDIT NO. 001206.OD.1400 OF CITY NATIONAL BANK, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA." WE 14EREBY ENGAGE WITH YOU THAT ALL DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS CREDIT SHALL BE DULY HONORED IF PRESENTED FOR PAYMENT AT THE OFFICE OF CITY NATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, 606 SOUTH OLIVE STREET, SUITE 300, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90014 ON OR BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS CREDIT. EXCEPT SO FAR AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY STATED, THIS CREDIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDBY PRACTICES 1998 0 ( "ISP98"), INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION NO. 590. AUTHO SIGNATURE TO MAN UEN VICE PRESIDENT w J AUT RIZED S NATURE CIUWYUK WAH WONG ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT STarYNATIONALBANK INTERNATION, )PERATIONS CENTi R 606 South Olive Street, Suite 300 Dele 11/30/00 CABLE ADDRESS'CINASANK LSA' Los Angeles, California 90014 TELEX 825717 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT APPLICATION AND LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT TO: CITY NATIONAL BANK (CNB) O Call We (Appl cant) request you to establish by O Overnight co erler aefvlw an Irrevocable standby Lefler of Credh off D same day fMMenew f ervke the follawinB terms and conditions: ADVISING BANK Ins. W eddrsd BENEFICIARY Inane am addr6e..I CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. VULCAN ENCINTTAS, rA o�- 1124 -- available by DraR(al at sled on CNB and accompanied by the following: APPLICANT Its. wild address RNICYNTTAC RANCH APARTMI4NTS T.Tl 10679 WESTVIEK PARRV_AY SAN DIEGO CA 92126 AMOUNT ptel..,a ctarencY -Le.. U.S. r -am pea $ .moon, in fiae d words; O , OO 7 ptr anade NINETY THOUS ND T RPF DQLLARc EXPIRY DATE 12/1/01 - -- . AT CNa'a ISSUING OFFICE 3 "I AN AUTHORIZED SIGNER OF THE CITY OF (Name of Signal 0 ENCINITAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, CERTIFY THAT ENCINITAS 0 � RANCH APARTMENTS HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS SET a FORTH IN THE PERMIT NO. ISSUED BY THE CITY OF a ENCINITAS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE CORNER N 0 OF GARDEN VIEW AND VIA CANTEBRIA, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA. 5 m 6 f o SIGNED DATE U 0 3 4 V i APPLICANT'S AGREEMENT TO PAY CNB 0 a CNB'. demand w If no demand Is made after. an DECFJdBER 1 2001 , m r z Applicant sgraH immadlatelY upon epey er Qnt W the total amoum of each diaWSament by CNB undo this Letter of Credit, together with interest thereon at the rate of n percent z par year in excess of the Rime Hate. The 'Prime Rate' shall mean the floating ban rate of CNB announced from time to time as its -Prime Rate'. Any change in the interest rate retuning from a change In the Prime Rate shall are effective an the effective date of change in the Prime Rate. Interest shall be calculated on a basis of a 360 day year and actual days elapsed. We further authorUa you to charge, without torts, notice, our account, for an account of any of usl for all such amoums when and as such are due and payable. THE OPENING OF THIS CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT APPEARING ON THE REVERSE HEREOF TO WHICH WE AGREE. WE FURTHER AGREE THAT THE CREDIT AS ISSUED SHALL INCLUDE SUCH REVISIONS OF THE LANGUAGE SET FORTH ABOVE AS YOU DEEM NECESSARY. IAPPLICANTI FOR BANK USE ONLY: APPROVAL OF CREDIT: N. Loan 01".. Iwam aOpNeai4 Branch ACCOUNT TO BE DEBITED: 1 1 &anch GtL No. 11305000 l 1 Customer Acct. No. In 01194 May OI MRI ENCINITA& RANCEL APARTMENTS LLC I TAME AUTHORU:ED SIGNATURE SOCIAL SECURITYRAXPAYER I.D. NO. rlwla DEC 0 6 2000 LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT In consideration of your opening, at our request, a letter of Credit Iherein called "the Credit '), the terms and conditions of which appear on the reverse side hereof we hereby agree as follows: 1. As to drafts under or purporting to be under the Credit, which are payable in lawful United States funds, we agree to pay you on demand at your issuing office in lawful United States funds, the amount of such draftfs) on the presentment to you thereof or, at your request in advance. 2. As to drafts under or purporting to be under the Credit, which are payable in foreign currency, we agree to pay you at your office on demand, the equivalent of each such draft in lawful United States funds at your then prevailing rate of exchange effective for sales of that other currency for cable transfer to the country of which it is the currency. 3. We also agree to pay to you any attorneys' leas incurred in the enforcement of this Letter at Credit Agreement, your service charge in accordance with your Schedule of Fees and Charges now existing or as hereafter adopted, and all other charges and expenses paid or incurred by you in connection therewith. 4. We agree to reimburse you for any losses and charges incurred by you or made against you in connection with this Agreement and related to the reevaluation or fluctuations in the exchange rate of any currency whether United States or any other. 5. We hereby convey and transfer to you a security interest in all goods, documents and instruments which shall come into your control or into your possession of that of any of your correspondents as the result of opening or in connection with any transactions under the Credit, which goods, documents and instruments are and shall be granted to you as security la) for all payments made or to be made by you or your correspondents under the Credit; (b) for any interest, commission or other customary charges in relation to the Credit and Icl for any other obligations or liabilities (absolute or contingent) of us to you, which now exist or are hereafter created. Upon any default by us in any of the undertakings set forth in this Letter of Credit Agreement, you are authorized to sell, under the provisions of the Commercial Code of the State of California, any or all goods, documents and instruments; in the event of any deficiency, we will pay the same to you immediately or in the event of any surplus, you shall pay the same to us or to The persons entitled thereto. In the event such described property should suffer any decline in value we will upon demand, deliver to you additional collateral to your satisfaction. 6. We agree that your rights and duties under the Credit are, except as otherwise provided herein, governed by the International Standby Practices 1998 IISP981, International Chamber of Commerce Publication as in force on the date of issuance of the Credit. 7. We agree that in the event of any amendments or modifications of the terms of the Credit, this Agreement shall be binding upon us with regard to The Credit so amended. You may (at your option) issue the requested Credit through a correspondent of your choice. 8. The users of the Letter of Credit shall be deemed our agents and we assume all risks of their acts of omissions. Neither you nor your correspondents shall be responsible forlar: the validity, sufficiency, or genuineness of documents, even it such documents should in fact prove to be in any or all respects invalid, insufficient, fraudulent or forged; the solvency or responsibility of any party issuing any documents; delay in arrival or failure to arrive of any documents; delay in giving or failure to give notice of arrival or any other notice; failure of any draft to bear adequate reference to the Credit; failure of documents to accompany any draft at negotiation, or failure of any person to note the amount of any draft on the reverse of the Credit, to surrender or take up the Credit or to send documents apart from drafts as required by the terms of the Credit, each of which provisions, if contained in the Credit itself, it is agreed may be waived by you; errors, or omissions, or interruptions or delays in transmission or delivery of any message by mail, cable, telegraph, wireless or otherwise; nor shall you be responsible for any error, neglect, or default of any of your correspondents; and none of the above shall affect, impair, or prevent the vesting of any of your rights or powers hereunder. In furtherance and extension and not in limitation of the specific provisions hereinbefore set forth, we agree that any action taken 6y you or any correspondent of you under or in connection with the Credit or relative drafts or documents, if taken in good faith, shall be binding on us and shall not put you or your correspondent under any resulting liability to us. 9. We agree at any time and from time to time, on demand, to deliver, convey, transfer, or assign to you, as security for any and all of our obligations and liabilities hereunder, and also for any and all other obligations and liabilities, absolute or contingent, due or to become due, which are or may at any time hereafter be owing to you, additional security of a value and character satisfactory to you, or to make such cash payment as you may require. We agree that all property belonging to us, or in which we may have an interest, conveyed, transferred, assigned, or paid to you, or coming into your possession or into the possession of anyone for you in any manner whatsoever, whether expressly as security, or for safekeeping or otherwise including any items received for collection or transmission and the proceeds thereof, whether of not such property is in whole or in part released to us on trust of bailee receipt, is security for each and all such obligations and liabilities. We agree that upon our failure at all times to keep a margin of security with you satisfactory to you, ar upon the making by us of any assignments for the benefit of creditors, or upon the filing of any voluntary or involuntary petition in bankruptcy by or against us, or upon any application for the appointment of a receiver of any of our property, or upon any act of bankruptcy or state of insolvency of us, or if you in good faith deem yourself insecure at any time, or upon the death of any of us, all of such obligations and liabilities shall become and be immediately due and payable without demand or notice notwithstanding any credit or time allowed to us, or any instrument evidencing any such obligation or otherwise; and each of us, and all of us, as to property in which we may have any interest, expressly authorize you in any such event, or upon our failure to pay any of such obligations or liabilities when it or they shall become or be made due, to sell all such property, in accordance with the Commercial Code of the State of California and to apply the net proceeds of such sale or sales, together with any balance of deposits and any sum credited by or due from you to us, in general accounts or otherwise, to the payment of all of our obligations or liabilities to you however arising. 10. Your rights specified in this Agreement are in addition to any created by statute or rule of law. You are expressly given the right to execute and file and record endorsements, assignments, financing statements, and other instruments in the name of any of us with respect to documents, property and interests relative to the Credit or any property of any of us in which you have a security Interest which may at any time come into your possession under the Credit or by virtue of this Agreement. We agree to pay all expenses, filing fees and other charges incurred by you relative to the perfection or enforcement of your rights and security interests hereunder. 11. You shall not be deemed to have waived any of your rights hereunder, unless you or your authorized agent shall have signed such waiver, in writing. No such waiver unless expressly stated therein shall be effective as to any transaction which occurs subsequent to the date of such waiver, nor as to any continuance of a breach after such waiver. 12. We understand that any credit issued pursuant to this Agreement is the direct obligation of you established in favor of our designated beneficiaries. Once established, such credit is irrevocable and is not subject to recall or stop payment, and any claim or demand by us to stop payment thereunder is void and of no effect. 13. The word property" as used in this Agreement includes goods, merchandise, securities, funds, chases in action, and any and all other forms of property, whether real, personal or mixed and any right or interest therein. 14. This Agreement incorporates the provisions on the reverse hereof. Time is of the essence. Acceptance by you of partial or delinquent payments or your failure to exercise any right, power or remedy shall not waive any obligation of us or modify this Agreement. You, your successors and assigns have all rights, powers and remedies herein and as provided by law, and may exercise the same and effect any setoff and proceed against any security for the obligations of us at any time notwithstanding any cessation of our liability or running of any statute of limitations, which we hereby waive to the fullest extent permitted by law. Notice to you must be given at the office of City National Bank to which this Credit and Agreement is addressed. 15. We hereby agree to pay all reasonable fees and costs incurred by you and arising out of any act or action you may take to enforce any provision of this Agreement or to enforce collection of any sums, payments or obligations owing from us to you. 16. If this Agreement is signed by one individual the terms, "we ", "our% "us ", shall be read throughout as "I ", 'my ", "me ", as the case may be. If this Agreement is signed by two or more parties, it shall be the joint and several Agreement of such parties. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS / gZ3 �i��e,s ifs t�� ✓ Sy Q; PERMIT NUMBER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER AI , (p `o CASHIER INITALS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agree menUCovenant AC 101-0000 - 345-0100 Construction CN 101-0000- 345-0200 Exempt Organizations EX 101-0000.3454)400 Grading Plancheck GR 101. 0000 - 345-0700 / Grading Inspection ^/ 5F/ /. Do GI 101 -0000 -345 -0800 Final Map Processing FM 1014)000 - 345 -0500 Parcel Map Processing PM 101-0000 - 345 -0600 Permanent Encroachment z �• ��/ PE 101 - 0000- 345.1100 ImprovementPlancheck IR 101 - 0000-345 -0900 Improvement inspection II 101. 0000- 345 -1000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101-0000 -345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101 - 0000 - 3451500 Street Name Change SN 1014000 - 345 -1300 A.P.N. Report PN 101 - 0000 - 3452100 Security Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL /� / Z a- ) Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 y07/ ENGINEERING UPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSi i" ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE : ED ECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED PROJECT NUMBER FIELD 9 TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE = SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN PROJECT / AMOUNT TOTAL CITY OF ENCINITAS rxr CVSTOM£R REC *7 .ar look � V BATCH ID: CASHIER 9 /01/00 0i m', ° RECEIPT i i A DESCRIPTION OTY W -XJ1NT PAYMENT DESL 0011973 PT 5V ]. $4150.00 * GRADING PLAN CHE GR CK. POINSETTIA RIDGE APART ENGINEERING / GRADING P 10100003450700 z_ TOTAL CHECK $NyA Terrier Details C": 1057 DATE: 6/31/00 $4150.00 $4150.00 TIME: 16:41:28 TIM NMMN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS /�/ PERMIT NUMBER LY JGr RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER S CASHIER INITALS 7 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant AC 101 -0000- 345 -0100 Construction CN 101-0000345-0200 Exempt Organizations EX 1010000345 -0400 Grading Plancheck /l��i' /. �L� GR 1010000 - 345-0700 Grading Inspection GI 101 -0000 - 345-0800 Final Map Processing FM 101-0000 - 345 - 0500 Parcel Map Processing PM 101 - 0000345 -0600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101-0000-3451100 Improvement Plancheck IR 101-0000- 345 -0900 Improvement inspection It 101.0000-345-1000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101-0000 -345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101 -0000 - 345.1500 Street Name Change SN 101-0000-345-1300 A.P.N. Report PN 101 -0000- 345.2100 Security Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /Oct151998 ENGINEERINIODEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEP091T ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE = ED [ECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED PROJECT NUMBER FIELD I PROJECT 8 1 TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE - SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN PROJECT i AMOUNT TOTAL �A�E.raress ATTORNEY SERVICE MESSENGER SERVICE 1302 Kenner Boulevard - San Diego, CA 92101 24 HOURS 7 DAYS (619) 685 -1122 DAME REGULAR RUSH EXPRESS N 731 4 Hours 2 Hours A -SA.P. AUTHORIZED BY: CHARGE REF. NO. rc c/ �. ROM: (COMPANY) (YOUR NAME) j_2 c_/ /" r a,", d trr G E STREET ADDRESS Vkd 3 kk 1 Jr, 'G ' i r 1 PLEASE CHECK ONE 6BELIVER TO � PICK -UP FROM SERVE n FILE OTHER NAME P1 STREET ADDRESS D S _ V CL CITY /STATE/ZIP RECIPIENT'S TIME: LEGIBLE SIGNATURE LIMITS OF LIABILITY W PER Y DELIVERY CHARGE SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS RETURN P/U FILING PROCESS SERVICE TOTAL CHARGE LOG k DR. PU FIT WHITE, YELLOW AND RED = MESS. GOLD = FOR YOUR RECORDS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE U6191r n APPLICANT NAME � 010-d SC-97A P /�� AOW7I EW L APPLICANT ADDRESS / Z-� rAtjPLC- etn 4 I S 'BL✓P -S'1-1C -J Q SkrJ D I C'Zso PERMIT NUMBER lC/�3y RECEIPT NUMBER 0 b ( .) C i 17 -: ) CHECK NUMBER -ff-- 10 LY 3 CASHIER INITALS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant AC 1014000 - 3450100 Construction CN 101 -0000 - 345 -0200 Exempt Organizations EX 101. 0000 -345 -0400 Grading Plancheck GR 101. 0000345 0700 Grading Inspection GI 101- 0000- 3454AM Final Map Processing FM 101-0000 - 34543500 Parcel Map Processing _ PM 101-00043450600 Permanent Encroachment b' PE 101-0000. 345.1100 improvement Plancheck 9 a7, Cz�, } IR 101 0.345 -0900 Improvement inspection 101-0004345 -1000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101-0004345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101 - 0004345 -1500 Street Name Change SN 1014004345.1300 A.P.N. Report PN 1014004345 -2100 Security Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL Permit Coordinator KC /iSa /0Ct151998 , & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSIT ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE - ED iECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED PROJECT NUMBER FIELD I PROJECT i I TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE - SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN PROJECT t rAMOUNT TOTAL CITY OF ENCINITAS *•• CUSTOMER RECEIPT ' *" BATCH ID: CASHIER 7/26/00 53 RECEIPT : 0004789 DESCRIPTION OTY AMOUNT PAYMENT DESC PT SV 1 $2200.00 * GRADING PLAN CHE OR CK POINSETTIA RIDGE APTS ENGINEERING / GRADING P 10100003450700 TOTAL CHECK $2200.00 Tender Details CKV 1033 $2200.00 DATE: 7126/00 TIME: 15:17:46 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME /i /l /. APPLICANT ADDRESS 9� �3 PERMIT NUMBER �y RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS M �/5306/� DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant AC 101-0000.345-0100 Construction CN 101 -0000. 345-0200 Exempt Organizations EX 101 4)000 - 345 -0400 Grading Plancheck /i,. GR 101 - 0000345-0700 Grading Inspection GI 101 -0000 -345 -0800 Final Map Processing FM 101-0000 - 345.0500 Parcel Map Processing PM 101. 0000 -345 -0600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101-0000-345-1100 Improvement Plancheck IR 101-00011345-0900 Improvement inspection II 101.0000 -345 -1000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101-0000.345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101-0000 - 345 -1500 Street Name Change SN 1014000,U5-1300 A.P N. Report PN 101. 0000. 345 -2100 Security Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL Z/ �D+ r O Permit Coordinator KC /jsq /0ct151998 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSIT ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE = ED ECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED PROJECT NUMBER FIELD I AMOUNT TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE = SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN) PROJECT II r AMOUNT TOTAL JAN -24 -01 02 :19PM FROM -SM T -111 P 01102 F -234 7 B `w'^ FAX TRANSMITTAL SSB&O, INC. Please deliver to the person listed below as soon as possible. Thank you Planning Design Consultation • • Itt TO: FROM: Jack Robson - - JEFF GA2Ac M I Dan O'Rourke GAS LSE FAXNO: 760 63 '5281'6 16)004 , 2226 DATE: January 24, 2001 JOB NO: RE. Poinsettia Ridge Apartments - Impervious Area Calc's NO, OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 2 If there are problems in receiving this information, please call (858) 560 -1141. FOR SB&O IN-HOUSE USE ONLY: Operator: To be returned: To be filed: SB &O, INC. LAND PLANNING +CIVIL ENGINEERING+LAND SURVEYING 3615 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 201+San Diego, Califomia +92123+(858) 560 - 1141 +Fax (858) 560 -8157 1-24-91 56122.X License Detail W":M; wysiwyg: //9/http: / /www2.csib.cp oo ... License+Detail.DML ?LicNum= ++351178 License letuil Contractor License # 351178 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BOARD u DISCLAIMER A license status check provides information taken from the CSLB license data base. Before relying on this information, you should be aware of the following limitations: . CSLB is prohibited by law from disclosing complaints until they are referred for legal action. . Civil judgments (mown to the CSLB are not disclosed unless the contractor has failed to comply with the judgment law. . Arbitrations are not listed unless the contractor fails to comply with the terms of the arbitration. Due to workload, there may be relevant information that has not yet been entered onto the Board's license data base. * * * BUSINESS INFORMATION * * * WESTERN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INC P O BOX 1164 LAKESIDE, CA 92040 Business Phone Number: (619) 443 -8569 ': Corporation Date: 02/17/1978 Expire Date: 10/31/2002 * * * LICENSE STATUS * * * license is current and active. All information below should be reviewed. * * * CLASSIFICATIONS GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR * * * CONTRACTOR BONDING INFORMATION * * * license has bond number 5015952 in the amount of $7,500 with the bonding company * * * WORKERS COMPENSATION INFORMATION * * * license has workers compensation insurance with the STATE COMPENSATION JRANCE FUND. Policy Number: 1590109 Effective Date: 06/23/2000 Expire Date: Personnel on this license are on other licenses. License Number Request I lContractor Name Request Personnel Name Request Salesperson Reciii= Salesperson Name Request 1 of 1 12/6/2000 9:22 AM Date: To: Company: Address: From Project: Project tf: Subject: November 14, 2000 Tamara O'Neil City of Encinitas 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Sherry Morrison Poinsettia Ridge Apartments 200015 Six copies of plans IVY 1��N XYour Request _ X For Your Use _For Necessary Action _For Your Review /Comments _For Approval _For Your Info /Files Tamara, Here are six copies of onsite landscape for Poinsettia Ridge Apartments. These copies are to be checked with SB & Qrs civil engineering grading plans for the onsite submitted 11 -3 -00. With each of these six copies are watering program, yearly watering schedule, a water management plan and water allowances cakvlatinns. Also, please note that there are some enlargements of the construction and planting plans that Pat Murphy requested. Could you please direct those enlargements to him.? If you have any questions, please call. ThanksO 9111, rha message Is:nte b1 tI use oI tM it wldual or entity to which It is addretxYl aM may cix,wn iMo matron [ t Is prMkyM. c WIdeMisl, ono exempt from dISC um u Me' applr"d IdW iY ttK INdII a NR m2SSag[ �Y nIX [11e �ntefMred RCipKn( yw, are het 'pry rgf!fiCO Nal eny d:sseminatgn. d14nIXRron w RQy�rT'� d trll$ [DmmUnK24on Ii sviTuy pro 'bitM. Landscape Architecture - Planning 434 West Cedar Street, Suite 300, San Diego, California 92101 Phone: (619) 235 -5360, Fax: (619) 235 -5369 POINSETTIA RIDGE THE MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE The formulas below are used to show compliance with the regulations on the maximum water allowance for a year, using the estimated figures from the irrigation schedules attached. MAWA = (ETO)'(0,8)'(LA)`(0,62) where: MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance (Gallons per Year) _ 1,032„236 ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration ( Inches per Year) = 42.9 0.8 = ET Adjustment Factor = 0.8 LA = Landscaped Area (square feet) - -Note: Same as HA 48,511 0.62 = Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot) = 0.62 ESTIMATED APPLIED WATER USE The Estimated Applied Water Use shall not exceed the Maximum Applied Water Allowance. It may be calculated by summing the amount of water recommended in the Irrigation Schedule. >>Total gallons for the year - -from the Gallonage Used Schedule = 672,238 ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE The Estimated Total Water Use may be calculated by summing the amount of water recommended in the Irrigation Schedule and adding any amount of water expected from effective precipitation, or may be calculated from a formula as follows: EWU (hydrozone) = (ETO)'(PF)'(HA)'(0.62 'Note: As the PF can vary per valve, the (PF)"(HA) in the formula is calculated by multiplying the PF times the HA individually for each valve, then adding the totals. (IE) EWU (hydrozone) = Estimate Water Use (Gallons per Year) = 658,481 ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches per year) = 42.9 PF = Plant Factor —Note: Same as Species Factor (SF) ) ` See HA = Hydrozone Area (square feet) —Same as LA ) ` below 15,473 (0.62) = Conversion Factor = 0.82 IE = Irrigation Efficiency = 0.825 'Note: As the PF can vary per valve, the (PF)"(HA) in the formula is calculated by multiplying the PF times the HA individually for each valve, then adding the totals. POINSETTIA RIDGE THE MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE The formulas below are used to show compliance with the regulations on the maximum water allowance for a year. using the estimated figures from the irrigation schedules attached. MAWA = (ETO)•(0.8)'(LA)•(0.62) where MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance (Gallons per Year) = 1.809.030 ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration ( Inches per Year) = 42.9 0.8 = ET Adjustment Factor = 0.8 LA = Landscaped Area (square feet)- -Note: Same as HA . 75,818 0.62 = Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot) = 0.62 ESTIMATED APPLIED WATER USE The Estimated Applied Water Use shall not exceed the Maximum Applied Water Allowance. It may be calculated by summing the amount of water recommended in the Irrigation Schedule. >>Total gallons for the year —from the Gallonage Used Schedule ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE The Estimated Total Water Use may be calculated by summing the amount of water recommended in the Irrigation Schedule and adding any amount of water expected from effective precipitation, or may be calculated from a formula as follows: EWU (hydrozone) = (ETO)*(PF)•(HA)•(0.62) (IE) EWU (hydrozone) = Estimate Water Use (Gallons per Year) ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches per year) PF = Plant Factor —Note: Same as Species Factor (SF) HA = Hydrozone Area (square feet) —Same as LA (0.62) = Conversion Factor IE = Irrigation Efficiency 944.735 }• See } • Note 21,725 = 0.825 'Note: As the PF can vary per valve, the (PF)'(HA) in the formula is calculated by multiplying the PF times the HA individually for each valve then adding the totals. [e1Jmu` .Ta5Iilso POINSETTIA RIDGE PAGE #2 TA- GALS. GALLONS USED PER STATION PER MONTH YEARLY TION PER TOTAL PER NO. MIN. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG E OCT NOV DEC STATION S -25 30.40 1843 2369 3159 3949 5265 5265 6318 6318 4607 3159 2369 1843 46,464 S -26 33.60 2037 2619 3492 4365 5092 5820 6547 6547 5092 3637 2619 2037 49,904 S -27 21.60 1964 2619 3367 4489 5612 5612 6734 6734 5051 3273 2619 1964 50,038 S -28 25.20 982 1309 1637 2182 2619 3055 3273 3273 2291 1746 1309 873 24,549 S -29 38.30 663 829 995 1327 1658 1990 1990 1990 1658 829 829 498 15,256 P -30 22.00 191 191 286 381 476 476 572 572 476 286 191 191 4,289 P -31 41.50 359 539 719 898 1078 1078 1258 1258 898 719 539 359 9,702 P -32 40.50 351 526 701 877 1052 1228 1228 1228 1052 701 526 351 9,821 P -33 41.50 359 539 719 898 1078 1258 1258 1258 1078 719 539 359 10,062 P -34 44.00 381 381 572 762 953 953 1143 1143 953 572 381 381 8,575 B -35 24.00 416 520 727 1039 1247 1247 1455 1455 1039 727 520 416 10,808 B -36 31.00 537 671 940 1342 1611 1611 1879 1679 1342 940 671 537 13,960 B -37 21.00 364 546 727 909 1091 1273 1273 1273 1091 727 546 364 10,184 B -38 19.00 329 411 576 823 987 1152 1152 1152 987 576 411 329 8,885 A -39 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AA0 1 0.00 ol 0 0 0 0 0 ol 0 0 ol 0 of 0 TOTAL GALS. PAGES 1 & 2 37,770 47,864 65,531 65,130 104,027 112,303 123,998 124,624 95,588 64,904 47,437 35,559 944,735 GALLONAGE USED POINSETTIA RIDGE A- GALS. GALLONS USED PER STATION PER MONTH YEARLY TION PER TOTAL PER NO. MIN. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG NOV DEC STATION T -1 43.00 2234 2607 3351 4469 5958 6144 6703 6703 5213 3538 2607 1862 51,389 T -2 18.00 2338 3273 4209 5456 6547 7482 8418 8418 6547 4209 3118 2338 62,353 T -3 19.50 507 675 1013 1182 1520 1520 1773 1773 1267 929 675 507 13,341 S-4 11.40 296 395 592 691 889 889 1037 1037 790 543 395 296 7,850 S -5 1 37.50 1137 1624 1949 2598 2923 3410 3897 3897 2923 1949 1461 1137 28,905 S-6 30.00 15. 2728 3118 4157 4676 4676 4676 3637 2598 1819 1429 36,892 S -7 31.70 2745 3294 4392 5490 6863 7412 8236 8236 6314 4392 3157 2333 62,864 S -8 33.70 730 876 1459 1751 2189 2189 2189 2189 1751 1459 876 730 18,388 S -9 38.90 1347 1684 2358 3032 3537 4042 4042 4042 3032 2358 1684 1179 32,337 S -10 24.00 416 624 831 1039 1247 1247 1455 1455 935 831 520 416 11,016 S -11 46.00 1394 1593 2390 2988 3585 4183 4780 4780 3585 2390 1593 1195 34,456 S -12 35.70 1082 1237 1855 2473 2782 3246 3246 3246 2782 1855 1237 927 25,968 S -13 40.70 1057 1410 2115 2467 3172 3172 3701 3701 2820 1939 1410 1057 28,021 S -14 30.50 660 792 1057 1585 1849 1849 1981 1981 1585 1057 792 528 15,716 S -15 1 18.00 468 624 935 1169 1403 1403 1637 1637 1169 935 624 468 12,472 S -16 21.00 546 637 909 1273 1455 1637 1637 1637 1455 909 637 546 13,278 S -17 30.90 669 803 1338 1606 1873 2007 2408 2408 1873 1204 803 669 17,661 S-18 30.40 527 527 790 1053 1316 1580 1580 1580 1185 790 527 395 11,850 S -19 19.30 251 334 501 669 836 836 1003 1003 836 501 334 251 7,355 S -20 34.30 446 594 891 1188 1337 1485 1485 1782 1337 891 594 446 12,476 S -21 38.10 990 1320 1485 1980 2475 2475 2970 3299 2640 1485 1320 825 23,264 S -22 16.60 431 575 647 1006 1078 1294 1294 1294 1078 719 575 359 10,350 A -23 32.00 3325 4434 5542 8314 9699 9976 11639 11639 8314 5542 4157 3325 85,906 A -24 1 23.601 18391 2044 3577 4292 5518 6131 6131 6131 4905 3270 2453 1839 48,130 TOTALS PER MONTH 26,994 33,795 46,914 60,889 74,208 80,285 87,918 88,544 67,973 46,293 33,368 25,057 672,238 Water Management Plan Poinsettla Ridge GOAL The goal of this water management plan is to conserve water by combining water conserving design practices with guidelines for the landscape irrigation manager. This plan will provide the owner with the necessary information to maintain systems in peak performance, and make decisions on when and how much to irrigate The irrigation system should be maintained to distribute water as uniformly as possible. The Irrigation controller should be monitored weekly to determine if the system is operating properly. By reviewing the controller window readout to see if breakage, leaks, clogs, vandalized spray heads, or stolen spray heads has occurred ( high and low volume of flow). Also checking the voltage readout to review which valve 's solenoid is running hot and about to fail. The irrigation system is designed so surface runoff is addressed. The turf area station times does not exceed 9 minutes per on cycle. Certain stations will come on twice per day with the turf coming on first, then the shrubs, then the turf again. The sequence will allow soil percolation. Shrub area station times does not exceed 9 minute per on cycle. Shrub stations are in consecutive sequence followed by the plaza stations, and then the bubbler stations. The irrigations system is designed with East I North facing plants on the same stations and the West / South facing plants on the same stations. Some stations may have a slight exposure around corners (example East / North with a slight West or West 1 South with a slight North. The trees and the palms are on the area sprinkler and their own deep watering bubbler stations. Contractor to adjust the bubbler stations when nessecary. When opportunities in the weather (overcast, cloudy, cooler than normal) has been forecasted in January, February, March, April, and May a reduction on the existing watering schedule should be implemented to save additional water for the summer weather. The landscape irrigation manager should maintain records of monthly water usage and determine if the site is staying within the allotment allowed by the San Diegito Water District during drought conditions. SOIL AND CLIMATIC CONDITION The soil ranges from silty sand and decomposed granite to rocky granitic concentrations with slight amounts of clay. The soil Is compact having less absorbing properties. The location is located in a Southern California coastal region, and is influenced by south coastal cloud, fog, and wind conditions, and sometimes experiences Santa Ana winds from the desert. ANNUAL PRECIPTATION RATE The annual historical precipitation rate Is 9.45 inches per year. For guideline use 1991 precipitation rate will be used, with the 80% limit in place. The Etc for 1991 was 57.09, with the 75% limit the Eto is 42.9. WATER SOURCE The water source for the site will be delivered by San Diegito Water District SOIL PERCOLATION A test sample using the silty sand, and decomposed granite that was screen to 1132 of inch and smaller. Using a 1 Inch saturation buffer, the following percolation rate for the next 1 Inch took 2 minutes. The irrigation run time on each station per cycle will be less than 10 minutes. This schedule will reduce the possibility of soil water field capacity and reduce runoff. PRECIPITATION RATES — PLANTED AREAS The precipitation rates for each irrigated area are as follows. Series, Low Gallonage, Matched Precipitation Rates, with Pressure Compensating Nozzles. YEARLY WATERING SCHEDULE POINSETTIA RIDGE 'LEGEND; L S D - Le ,ShnA,ft. 12 3 = high, mod., low water requirement. STA- JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV TION L -' GALS NUM - S-' PER 1! `� ie T 10 BER D -' MIN a 3 s c i E 3 C 3 E a S 5 3 OR T -1 L2 43.00 2 1 6 2 1 7 3 1 6 3 1 8 4 1 8 3 1 11 4 1 9 4 1 9 2 1 14 1 1 19 1 1 14 T -2 L2 18.00 3 2 5 3 2 7 6 1 9 5 2 7 6 2 7 6 2 8 6 2 9 6 2 9 8 2 7 6 1 9 1 1 40 T -3 L2 19.50 1 1 6 1 1 8 2 1 6 2 1 7 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 7 3 1 5 1 1 11 1 1 8 S4 S2 11.40 1 1 8 1 1 8 2 1 6 2 1 7 3 1 8 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 7 2 1 8 1 1 11 1 1 8 S -5 S2 37.50 1 1 7 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1 8 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 8 3 1 8 2 1 9 1 1 12 1 1 9 S-6 S2 30 00 2 1 6 2 1 7 3 1 7 3 1 8 4 1 8 4 1 9 4 1 9 4 1 9 2 1 14 1 1 20 1 1 14 S -7 S2 31.70 2 2 5 3 1 8 4 1 8 5 1 8 5 2 5 8 1 9 6 2 5 8 2 5 2 1 23 2 1 18 1 1 23 S -8 S2 33.70 1 1 5 1 1 6 2 1 5 2 1 6 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 4 1 3 2 1 5 2 1 3 S-9 S2 38.90 2 1 4 2 1 5 2 1 7 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 8 3 1 8 3 1 8 3 1 6 2 1 7 1 1 10 S -10 S2 24.00 1 1 4 2 1 3 2 1 4 2 1 5 2 1 6 3 1 4 2 1 7 2 1 7 3 1 3 2 1 4 1 1 5 5 -11 S2 46.00 1 1 7 2 1 4 2 1 6 3 1 5 3 1 6 3 1 7 4 1 6 4 1 6 3 1 6 2 1 6 2 1 4 S-12 S2 35.70 1 1 7 2 1 4 2 1 8 2 1 8 3 1 8 3 1 7 3 1 7 3 1 7 2 1 9 2 1 6 1 1 8 S -13 S2 40.70 1 1 6 2 1 4 2 1 6 2 1 7 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 7 2 1 8 1 1 11 1 1 8 5-14 S2 30.50 1, 5 1 1 6 1 1 8 2 1 6 2 1 7 2 1 7 3 1 5 3 1 5 2 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 6 5 -15 S2 18.00 1 1 6 2 1 4 2 1 6 3 1 5 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 7 3 1 5 2 1 6 1 1 8 5-16 S2 21.00 1 1 8 1 1 7 2 1 5 2 1 7 2 1 8 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 1 6 2 1 8 1 1 10 1 1 7 S -17 S2 30.90 1 ;"5 1 1 6 2 1 5 2 1 6 2; 7 5 3 1 6 3 1 6 2 1 7 1 1 9 1 1 6 S -18 S2 30.40 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 1 6 1 1 8 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1 6 2 1 6 1 1 9 1 1 6 1 1 4 S-19 S2 19.30 1 a. 3 1 1 4 1 1 6 2 1 4 2 1 5 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1 6 2 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 4 5 -20 S2 34.30 1 1 3 1 1 4 2 1 3 2 1 4 3 1 3 2 1 5 2 1 5 4 1 3 3 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 2 5 -21 S2 38.10 2 1 3 2 1 4 3 1 3 3 1 4 3 1 5 3 1 5 2 1 9 5 1 4 4 1 4 3 1 3 2 1 4 S-22 S2 16.60 2 1 3 2 1 4 3 1 3 2 1 7 3 1 5 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 1 5 2 1 5 2 1 4 A -23 S2 32.00 3 1 8 4 2 4 5 1 8 6 2 5 5 2 7 6 2 6 6 2 7 6 2 7 6 2 5 5 1 8 5 1 6 A -24 S2 23.60 3 1 6 5 2 2 5 1 7 7 2 3 6 1 9 6 2 5 6 2 5 8 2 5 6 1 8 4 1 8 4 1 6 TOTAL MIN/DAY 126 125 142 149 149 155 162 155 180 209 211 TOTAL HRS/WK 3.6 46 6.3 8.2 10.0 10.8 12 9 11.9 9.2 6.2 4.5 TOTAL HRS/DAY 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.5 YEARLY WATERING SCHEDULE i it 4A. A 1 1 4 1 1 6 4198 1 3 1 1 3 1 5 a YEARLY WATERING SCHEDULE �cnu', � a u • �wn,anm,ury. i � a - wvr ��nwa �- JAN FES MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUO SEP OCT NOV DEC 4 L-' GALS 4 1E 5 99 1 f 5 9 1 'S 99 1 b 89 9 9 99 A- S-' PER Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q L D' MIN s c c c c s c s c c c L2 43.00 1 1 11 1 1 14 1 1 19 1 1 25 1 1 31 1 1 33 1 1 36 1 1 36 1 1 28 1 1 19 1 1 14 1 1 10 L2 18.00 1 1 32 1 1 40 1 1 56 1 1 72 1 1 89 1 1 97 1 1 105 1 1 105 1 1 80 1 1 55 1 1 40 1 1 30 L2 1950 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 11 1 1 14 1 1 17 1 1 19 1 1 20 1 1 20 1 1 16 1 1 11 1 1 8 1 1 6 S2 11.40 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 14 1 1 17 % 18 1 1 20 1 1 20 1 1 15 1 1 11 1 1 8 1 1 6 S2 37.50 1 1 1 1 12 1 1 16 1 1 19 1 1 21 1 1 23 1 t 23 1 1 17 1 1 12 1 1 9 1 1 7 S2 30.00 1 1 1 1 1 20 1 1 25 1 1 31 1 11� 34 1 1 37 1 t 37 1 1 26 1 1 20 1 1 14 1 1 11 S2 31.70 1 1 1 H 1 1 41 1 1 50 1 --nn 7' 54 1 1 59 1 1 59 1 1 45 1 1 32 1 1 23 1 1 17 $2 3370 1 1 1ST 1 9 1 1 11 1 1 14 1 1 1s 1 1 16 1 1 16 1 1 13 1 1 9 1 1 6 1 1 5 82 38.90 1 1 ^ 1 �1 14 1 1 18 1 1 21 1 1 23 1 ,1& 25 1 1 25 1 1 19 1 1 14 1 1 10 1 1 7 S2 24 00 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 9 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 1 13 1 1 13 1 1 10 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 1 4 1 S2 4600 1 1 7 1 1 8 1 1 12 1 1 15 1 1 18 1 1 20 11 1 1 22 1 1 17 1 1 12 1 1 6 1 1 6 t S2 35.70 1 1 7 1 1 8 1 1 12 1 1 15 1 1 18 1 1 20 ,22 1 '1 � 22 1 1 22 1 1 17 1 1 12 1 1 8 Aw: 6 3 S2 4070 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 1 t 1 1 14 1 1 17 1 1 18 1 1 20 1 1 20 1 1 15 1 1 11 1 1 6 1 6 L 82 30.50 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 11 1 1 13 1 1 14 11W15 1 1 15 1 1 12 1 1_ �1 •� M, 4 5 $2 16 DO 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 11 1 1 14 1 1 16 1 1 19 1 1 21 1 1 21 1 1 16 1 1 11 1 1 8 1 1 6 i S2 2100 1 1 6 1 1 7 1 1 10 1 1 13 1 1 16 1 1 18 1 1 19 1 1 19 1 1 15 1 1 10 1 1 7 1 1 6 S2 30.90 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 9 1 1 12 1 1 14 1 1 18 1 -_17 1 1 17 1 1 13 1 1 9 1 1 6 1 1 5 1 S2 3040 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 10 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 12 1 1 9 1 1 6 1 1 4 1 1 3 �'12 i S2 19.30 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 10 1 1 10 11 =11 1 1 11 1 1 9 1 1 8 1 1 4 1 1 3 ) S2 34.30 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 8 1 1 9 1 1 10 1 1 10 1 1 81 1 1 5 1 1 41 1 1 3 1 S2 3810 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 10 1 1 12 1 1 15 1 1 16 1 1 18 1 1 18 1 1 14 1 1 10 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 S2 16.80 1 1 8 1 1 7 1 1 10 1 1 13 1 1 18 1 1 17 1 19 1 1 19 1 1 14 1 1 10 1 1 7 1 1 5 3 S2 32 00 1 1 24 1 1 3D 1 1 42 1 1 54 1 1 66 1 t 73 1 1 79 1 1 79 1 1 60 1 1 42 1 1 30 1 1 23 S2 23.60 1 1 19 1 1 24 1 1 33 1 1 43 1 1 52 1 1 57 1 62 1 1 62 1 1 48 1 1 33 1 1 24 1 1 18 i S2 30.40 1 1 14 1 1 17 1 1 24 1 1 31 1 1 38 1 1 42 1 1 45 1 1 45 1 1 35 1 1 24 1 1 17 1 1 13 5 S2 33.60 1 1 14 1 1 17 1 1 24 1 1 30 1 1 37 1 1 41 1 1 44 1 1 4 1 1 34 1 1 24 1 1 17 1 1 13 7 S2 21.60 1 1 21 1 1 26 1 1 37 1 1 47 1 1 58 1 1 63 1 1 68 1 1 fib 1 1 53 1 1 37 1 1 26 1 1 20 1 S2 25.20 1 1 9 1 1 11 1 1 15 1 1 19 1 1 24 1 1 28 1 1 28 1 1 28 1 1 21 1 1 15 1 1 11 1 1 8 9 S2 38.30 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 10 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 1 12 1 1 9 1 1 6 1 1 5 1 1 3 S2 22.00 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 5 1 1 8 1 1 6 1 1 5 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 I S2 4150 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 6 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 2 t 82 40.50 1 1 2 1 1' 4 1 1 5 1 1 8 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 8 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 2 5 S2 4150 1 1 2 1 1 8 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 6 t 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 6 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 2 l 32 4.00 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 6 1 1 5 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 5 S2 24.00 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 9 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 1 13 1 1 13 1 1 10 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 1 4 1 S2 31.00 1 1 4 1 1 7 1 1 9 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 1 13 1 1 13 1 1 10 1 1 7 1 1 3 7 S2 21 00 1 1 4 1 1 9 1 1 6 1 1 10 1 1 12 1 1 13 1 1 14 1 1 14 1 1 11 1 1 8 1 1 8 1 1 4 1 S2 1&00 1 1 4 1 1 'i 1 7 1 1 9 1 1 12 1 1 13 1 1 14 1 1 14 1 1 11 1 1 7 1 1 5 3 000 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 J D.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 d 0.o0 1 1 o I 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 I 000 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Q 000 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 ol 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 IAL MINIDAY 302 378 529 681 834 909 987 987 761 529 378 285 fAL HRSANK 311 4.5 63 8.1 99 10.7 117 117 90 63 4.5 34 UL HRSIDAY 50 6.3 88 114 139 15.2 165 165 127 88 6.3 4.8 By: Studio Five WATER PROGRAM POINSETTIA RIDGE FORMULA TO DETERMINE MINUTES PER WEEK. ET0 /4.33'PFt0.625/PR'SF'60 'Letters. L S 0 = Lawn, Shrub, Drip. -Nos.. 1, 2, 3 = high, med., low water requirement. The "ETO" is shown under each month STA- L -' GALLONS AREA PRECIP. PLANT IRRIG. SOIL JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR 1.72 2.15 3.01 3.87 4.73 5.16 5.59 5.59 4.3 3.01 2.15 1.62 42.9 TION S -' PER SO. FT. RATE FACT. EFF. SLOPE < -_ MINUTES PER WEEK -> NO. D -' MINUTE HA PR PF IE SF T -1 L2 43.00 2009 2.06 0.6 0.625 1.00 11 14 19 25 31 33 36 36 28 19 14 10 276 T -2 L2 18.00 2439 0.71 0.6 0.625 1.00 32 40 56 72 89 97 105 105 80 56 40 30 802 T -3 L2 19.50 509 3.69 0.6 0.625 1.00 6 8 11 14 17 19 20 20 16 11 8 6 156 S-4 S2 11.40 562 1.89 0.3 0.625 1.00 6 8 11 14 17 18 20 20 15 11 8 6 154 S -5 S2 37.50 2208 1.64 0.3 0.625 1.00 7 9 12 16 19 21 23 23 17 12 9 7 175 S -6 S2 30.00 2842 1.02 0.3 0.625 1.00 11 14 20 25 31 34 37 37 28 20 14 11 282 S -7 S2 31.70 4828 0.63 0.3 0.625 1.00 18 23 32 41 50 54 59 59 45 32 23 17 453 S-8 S2 33.70 1433 2.26 0.3 0.625 1.00 5 6 9 11 14 15 16 16 13 9 6 5 125 S -9 S2 38.90 2552 1.47 0.3 0.625 1.00 8 10 14 18 21 23 25 25 19 14 10 7 194 S -10 S2 24.00 815 2.84 0.3 0.625 1.00 4 5 7 9 11 12 13 13 10 7 5 4 100 S -11 S2 46.00 2562 1.73 0.3 0.625 1.00 7 8 12 15 18 20 22 22 17 12 8 6 167 S -12 S2 35.70 2000 1.72 0.3 0.625 1.00 7 8 12 15 18 20 22 22 17 12 8 6 167 S -13 S2 4070 2073 1.89 0.3 0.625 1.00 6 8 11 14 17 18 20 20 15 11 8 6 154 S -14 82 30.50 1200 2.45 0.3 0.625 1.00 5 6 8 11 13 14 15 15 12 8 6 4 117 S-15 S2 18.00 972 1.78 0.3 0.625 1.00 6 8 11 14 18 19 21 21 16 11 8 6 159 S -16 S2 21.00 1033 1.96 0.3 0.625 1.00 6 7 10 13 16 18 19 19 15 10 7 6 146 S -17 S2 30.90 1346 2.21 0.3 0.625 1.00 5 6 9 12 14 16 17 17 13 9 6 5 129 S-18 S2 30.40 911 3.21 0.3 0.625 1.00 4 4 6 8 10 11 12 12 9 6 4 3 89 S-19 S2 19.30 564 3.30 0.3 0.625 1.00 3 4 6 8 10 10 11 11 9 6 4 3 85 S -20 S2 34.30 889 3.72 0.3 0.625 1.00 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 10 8 5 4 3 76 S -21 S2 38.10 1753 2.09 0.3 0.625 1.00 5 7 10 12 15 16 18 18 14 10 7 5 137 S -22 S2 16.60 807 1.98 0.3 0.625 1.00 6 7 10 13 16 17 19 19 14 10 7 5 143 A -23 S2 32.00 6511 0.47 0.3 0.625 1.00 24 30 42 54 66 73 79 79 60 42 30 23 602 A -24 S2 23.60 5673 0.40 0.2 0.625 1.00 19 24 33 43 52 57 62 62 48 33 24 18 475 TOTALS 704.80 48,511 214 268 376 484 591 644 701 701 538 376 268 202 5,363 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PROJECT NAME: POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS JOB NO 56122.20 S B & O, INC. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 560 -1141 (858) 560 -8157 FAX NO. OF LOTS: 1 w0.: EST. BY., DJO DATE: 02 -Nov -00 CKD. BY: DATE: 02 -Nov -00 POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS - CITY OF ENCINITAS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE (PRELIMINARY) DWG NO ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT COST AMOUNT BOND PRICE BOND AMOUNT 1 PCC CURB & GUTTER REMOVAL 170 170 LF $3.00 $510 2 6" TYPE "G" CURB & GUTTER 140 140 LF $13.75 $1,925 3 PCC SIDEWALK 4,500 4,500 SF $4.00 $18,000 4 PEDESTRIAN RAMPS 2 2 EA $1,050.00 $2,100 5 PCC CROSS GUTTER 935 935 SF $6.25 $5,844 6 8" SEWER LATERAL 60 60 LF $65.00 $3,900 7 TRENCH RESURFACING 135 135 LF $23.00 $3,105 8 STRIPING REMOVAL 4,275 4,275 LF $2.00 $8,550 9 2 WAY TURN STRIPING - DETAIL 31 Z825 2,825 LF $0.65 $1,836 10 4" DBL YELLOW -DETAIL 21 480 480 LF $0.65 $312 11 8" WHITE - DETAIL 38A 450 450 LF $0.65 $293 12 ARROWS /LEGENDS 7 7 EA $200.00 $1,400 13 SIGNS- REGULATORY 3 3 EA $350.00 $1,050 14 RELOCATE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 2 2 EA $350.00 $700 15 ADJUST PULL BOX TO GRADE 5 5 EA $200.00 $1,000 16 AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2,575 2,575 SF $1.00 $2,575 17 SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING 2,575 y 2,575 SF $1.25 $3,219 18 90 DAY MAINTENANCE 1 4 F 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000 w m a s F O 6 Sub Total $61,318 10% Contl $6,132 TOTAL $67,450 TOTAL D M 12210Gmoubl¢COSr wb2 02 -fty-0 64490 10 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE frROJECT NAME: POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS JOB NO: 56122.20 S B & O, INC. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (619) 560 -1141 (619) 560 -8157 FAX NO, OF LOTS: 1 W 0. EST. BY: DJO DATE: 16- Sep -00 CKD. BY. DATE 16- Sep -00 POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS - CITY OF ENCINITAS ROUGH GRADING COST ESTIMATE (PRELIMINARY) DWG. NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT COST AMOUNT BOND PRICE BOND AMOUNT 1 EXCAVATION 8,500 8,500 CY $4.10 $34,850 2 EARTH IMPORT 3,300 3,300 CY $8.60 $28,380 3 EROSION CONTROL 1 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000 4 1 TYPE "B" CURB INLET 2 2 EA $3,675.00 $7,350 5 TYPE " A-4 " CLEANOUT 3 3 EA $3,790.00 $11,370 6 TYPE "F "CATCH BASIN 2 2 EA $3,400.00 $6,800 7 BROW DITCH - (D -75) 910 910 LF $13.65 $12,422 8 KEYSTONE WALL 8,000 8,000 SF $28.00 $224,000 9 8" PVC CULVERT(SDR -35) 200 200 LF $37.00 $7,400 10 12" PVC CULVERT(SDR -35) 475 475 LF $37.00 $17,575 11 18" PVC CULVERT(SDR -35) 565 565 LF $84.00 $47,460 12 12" X 12" AREA DRAIN 8 8 EA $500.00 $4,000 13 18" RCP (Public in Street RAM 22 22 LF $84.00 $1,848 14 Trench Resurfacing (SDG 107) 15 15 LF $23.00 $345 15 Concrete Pipe Collar (D -62) 1 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000 16 Remove Rip Rap and D -75 1 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500 Sub Total $411,300 o �s 10% Cont $41,130 5 2 Total $452,429 c w r 0 0.47677 m Q� * Ex p- 12 -31 - T Q TOTAL $451,429 TOTAL Y.Nd- pbsM12210pViovgh GladeCOST wb2 16 Sep00 5 50 .10 69/16/2000 11:wo 0582920771 SAN DIEGO PAGE 02 A GTG Company Leighton and Associates G EOT E C H N ICAL CONSULTANTS PROTECT MEMORANDUM To: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Date: September 14, 2000 Encinitas Town Center. LLC 9823 Pacific Heights Boulevard, Suite J San Diego, California 92121 Project No. 940028 -029 Attention: Mr. Rudy Medina From: Kevin B. Colson Subject: Temporary Backcut Stability, Proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Encinitas Town Center Lot 45, Encinitas, California References: Leighton and Associates, Inc., 2000, Update Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Encinitas Town Center Lot 45, Encinitas, California. Project No. 4940028 -029, dated April 26, 2000. SB &O. Inc., 2000, Preliminary Grading Plans for Encinitas Ranch Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Sheets 1 through 4, Scale: 1 " =30 ". This project memorandum has been in accordance with your request to address the stability of the proposed temporary backcut to be excavated around the proposed building foundation for the Proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Encinitas Town Center Lot 45, Encinitas, California. According to the preliminary grading plans for the site (SB &O, 2000), up to a temporary 1 I foot -tall backcut is to be excavated outside of the proposed building limits to allow for constructionof the foundation and walls for the proposed structure and underground parking. Specifically detail B -2 on sheet 2 of 4 shows a 5 -foot vertical cut below a 6 -foot tall 1:1 backcut forming a composite I I foot -tall backcut (SB &O, 2000). Based on review of our updated investigation and stability analysis of the proposed backcut it is our professional opinion that the proposed temporary backcut will not be sufficiently stable in the on site soils. However, based on our stability analysis we provide the following alternative temporary slope design. We recommend the backcut excavation be cut at a 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) inclination from the top of the excavation to the bottom with no vertical sections. We also recommend the excavation be observed by a representative of this office to confirm the stability of the temporary backcut. In addition we recommend that the excavation be re- evaluated by representatives of this office on a monthly basis and that the temporary excavation not be left open for a period greater than 4- months. P 18 X100 I -- - 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, #B205, San Diego, CA 9213 -4425 (619) 292.8030 • FAX (619) 292 -0771 • www.leightongeo. com 09/16/2000 11:45 6562920771 SAN DIEGG PAGE 03 930025 -029 If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Distribution: (2) Addressee Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Kevin B. Colson Senior Staff Geologist/Project Manager Sea o Directorof Engineering No. 2507 ^ c gyp, 12/3`!03 A Cn,I�\GQa\r 2 ��` i IF KEYS ICE 1. Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters Soil Parameters Retained Fill: Foundation Fill: CEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG. Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1. 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) A- c osf 1--p-Of 32 0 130 32 0 130 Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) I Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 1.50/1.13 Date: 8/24/00 Bv: lec Bearing: Analysis: Gravity Section Case: Case I Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wail Ht: 2.67 ft embedment: 0.67 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset — 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Slidine Overturnin¢ Bearine Shear Bendine Factors of Safety: 3.49/1.20 5.36/1.30 24.21/8.63 N/A N/A Calculated Bearing Pressure: 324/2276 psf Eccentricity at base: 0.04 ft/1.49 R C: \My Documents \l861.kwp 111 No. 36292 Sxf � /3o/oY J} CI V 4lF OF CAUF�� page 1 of 25 l ttEr nc wnu sysrgats Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG. Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) Date: 8/24/00 By: lec Soil Parameters A_ c osf ��cf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 -- 3 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands 2 Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS ITS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 710 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall t (1 +02.25 to 1 +10.50) Case: Case I Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 5.67 ft embedment: 1.50 It BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL — 0 psf uniform surcharge DL — 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Slidine Overturning Factors of Safety: 2.51/1.22 5.4712.01 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 794/1541 psf Tel Tsc Eccentricity at base: -0.15 ft/1.04 ft 731/974 ok N/A Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated 6.85/4.10 ok Tension Laver Height Length Tension Reinf. Tvoe Tal 3 4.00 5.0 F076/ 212 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 2.67 5.0 2041341 SG200 93311555 ok 1 0.67 5.0 207/494w S0200 933/1555 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 22 % ) SG200: 1.67 sy /ft Bearine Shear Bending 18.07/12.91 27.42 2.95 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tel Tsc FS 731/974 ok N/A 7.87/3.92 ok 870/1159 ok N/A 6.85/4.10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A 8.10/5.11 ok FoS PO= 7.65/4.33 No. 36292 ckP (0/3o/0 OF C: \My Documents \1861.kwp page ? of 26 'ry-, - µ.ms -r- (... Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters .UYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1.24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN Date: 8/24/00 (display: static/seismic) By: lec Soil Parameters -k- c nsf 7-�cf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 5 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands a Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus 3 - - 2 Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.50 /1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.5011.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Load Width= 0.00 It Results: Sliding Tull RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tat Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 SG300 3005 1.61 1.10 1.10 1542 1.50 1028 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (1 +10.50 to 4+00.00) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 11.33 ft embedment: 1.50 It BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 It long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset -- 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 It Results: Sliding Overturning Factors of Safety: 2.92/1.55 7.40/3.15 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1817/2370 psf >l0 />10 ok Eccentricity at base: -0.66 ft/l.15 ft >10 / >10ok Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated 1041/1388 ok N/A Tension Laver Height Length Tension Reinf. Type Tal 5 9.33 14.0 137 / 351 SG200 933/1555 ok 4 8.00 14.0 225/451 SG200 933/1555 ok 3 6.00 14.0 412/656 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 4.00 14.0 567/829 SG200 933/1555 ok 1 2.00 14.0 497 / 142 l S0300 1028/1713 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 52 % ) SG300: 1.56 sy /ft SG200: 6.22 sy /ft Pref: Embed./ H CAMy Documents \l861.kwp Bearine Shear Bending 17.62/15.14 11.77 2.20 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tcl Tsc FS 765/1020 ok N/A >l0 />10 ok 904/1205 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok NIA >10 />10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10 ok 1383/1844 ok N/A >10 / >10ok FoS PO= >101>10 Landmark rx Na.36292 EY, 6q 301 dY OF rat \F�� page 3 of 25 io Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG, Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN Date: 8/24/00 (display: static /seismic) By: lec Soil Parameters A- c Psf y _cf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 - Retained Fill: 32 0 130 5 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 4 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands �3 Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus - -'2 Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g1 Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: 2.00 /1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tull RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 SG300 3005 1.61 1.10 1.10 1542 1.50 1028 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (4 +00.00 to 4 +23.25) Case: Case Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 12.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Sliding Overturnine Bearing Shear Bendin Factors of Safety: 2.38/1.13 4.86/1.72 13.87/8.45 11.05 2.20 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1741/3858 psf Eccentricity at base: -0.20 ft/2.41 ft Allow. Peak Serviceablity Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs /ft) Calculated Tension Connection Connection Pullout Laver Height Length Tension Reinf. Type Tal TO Tsc FS 5 10.00 10.0 174 / 377 SG200 933/1555 ok 765/1020 ok N/A >10/9.94 ok 4 8.00 10.0 310/545 SG200 933/1555 ok 973/1298 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 3 6.00 10.0 464/733 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok 2 4.00 10.0 619/921 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1 2.00 10.0 557 / 1553w SG300 1028/1713 ok 1388/1851 ok N/A > 10/8.30 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 59 %) FoS PO= > 10/7.85 SG300: 1.11 sy /ft SG200: 4.44 sy /ft CAMy Documents11861.kwp QQF is sjfw, CEE 4e -A No 36292 a: ExP b /3d1 a4 l cfvl\- JglEOF CAO\ Q page _,y of 25 KEYa 1Qi9J Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters (EYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG. Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) Soil Parameters A C DSf X-gcf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, 1 inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Date: 8124/00 By: lee - +- 5 - -q 3 2 it Bearing 2.00/1.50 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.9D 0.95 SG500 4608 1.61 1.10 1.10 2365 1.50 1577 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (4 +23.25 to 4 +39.00) Case: Case I Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 14.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Sliding Overturnine Factors of Safety: 2.43/1.15 5.01/1.77 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 2056/4318 psf Eccentricity at base: -0.26 ft/2.72 It Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated Tension Laver Hei ht Length Tension -/393 Reinf. Tvoe Tat 6 12.00 12.0 174 SG200 933/1555 ok 5 10.00 12.0 310/556 SG200 933/1555 ok 4 8.00 12.0 464/739 SG200 933/1555 ok 3 6.00 12.0 619/921 SG200 93311555 ok 2 4.00 12.0 774/1104 SG200 933/1555 ok 1 2.00 12.0 632 / 1809w SG500 1577/2628 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 61 % ) SG500: 1.33 sy /ft SG200: 6.67 sy /ft Embed./ H Bearing Shear Bending 13.66/8.46 9.34 2.20 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tcl Tie FS 765/1020 ok NIA > 10/ > 1> 10 ok 973/1299 ok N/A > 10/ > 10 ok 1041/1388 ok NIA >10 1 >10ok 1041/1388 ok NIA >10 / >10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 1 >10ok 1533/2044 ok NIA >10/ > 10 ok FoS PO= >101>10 Landmark QpFESSlry ' NCE E <<^ �o y� No. 36292 ;3D cr Ey-P 46 /3o /o 'nl CIV15- L* 'e 4lf OF CALF C: \My Documents \1861.kwp page 5 of .2 K�.YST I�E� Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1.24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) Soil Parameters IL c nsf Y--Lc-f Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Date: 8/24/00 By: lec - -8 - 7 6 5 _4 Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 SG300 3005 1.61 1.10 1.10 1542 1.50 1028 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (4 +39.00 to 4 +56.25) Case: Case I Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 16.00 ft embedment: 1.50 R BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Sliding Overturning Bearin Shear Bendin Factors of Safety: 2.50/1.17 5.19/1.81 13.53/8.43 9.34 2.20 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 2366/4836 psf Eccentricity at base: -0.34 ft/3.07 ft Allow. Peak Serviceablity Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs /ft) Calculated Tension Connection Connection Pullout Laver Height Length Tension Reinf. Type Tal Tcl Tsc FS 8 14.00 14.0 174 / 375 SG200 933/1555 ok 765/1020 ok N/A > 10/ > 1> 10 ok 7 12.00 14.0 310/531 SG200 933/1555 ok 973/1298 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok 6 10.00 14.0 464/706 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 1 >10ok 5 8.00 14.0 619/882 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/>10 ok 4 6.00 14.0 774/ 1058 SG200 93311555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 />10 ok 3 4.00 14.0 763/1068 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10 ok 2 2.67 14.0 6881 1006 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041 /1388 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok 1 1.33 14.0 619/ 1493w SG300 1028/1713 ok 1388/1851 ok N/A >10/>10 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 66 %) FoS PO= > l0 /> 10 SG300: 1.56 sy /ft SG200: 10.89 sy /ft f II No. 36292 - , I\CXe 6 13oIc Jl CIVIC- �£ OF Pref. Embed./ HingeHt./ - I - C:\My Documents \1861.kwp page 4- of 2,5 _�L_ Te la-*4 Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG, Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1.24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) Soil Parameters C DSf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Date: 8/24/00 By: ]cc - e �_. 6 4 J Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Serviceability: 2.00/1,50 N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 SG300 3005 1.61 1.10 1.10 1542 1.50 1028 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (4 +56.25 to 4 +72.00) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 18.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 It long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Shear Bending Slidin 13.45/8.39 Factors of Safety: 2.20 2.58/1.18 Peak Calculated Bearing Pressure: 2673/5382 psf Eccentricity at base: -0.42 ft/3.44 ft Connection Connection Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated Tcl Laver Height Length Tension Reinf. Type 9 16.00 16.0 F747/ 393 SG200 8 14.00 16.0 310/548 SG200 7 12.00 16.0 464/722 SG200 6 10.00 16.0 619/896 SG200 5 8.00 16.0 774/ 1070 SG200 4 6.00 16.0 929/ 1244 SG200 3 4.00 16.0 892/ 1227 SG200 2 2.67 16.0 791 11139 SG200 1 1.33 16.0 696 / 1676w SG300 Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): SG300: 1.78 sy /ft SG200: 14.22 sy /ft Pref. Embed./ Overturnine 5.38/1.83 Allow. Tension Tal 933/1555 ok 933/1555 ok 933/1555 ok 933/1555 ok 933/1555 ok 933/1555 ok 933/1555 ok 933/1555 ok 1028/1713 ok ( Efficiency= 74 % ) Bearine Shear Bending 13.45/8.39 7.78 2.20 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tcl Tsc FS 765/1020 ok N/A >10 / >1 0ok 973/1298 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 1 >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1388/1851 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok FoS P0= >10t>10 ��rhteECo �4- S fir^ z No. 36292 ExP (o /3 %y OF C f Al \F� CAMy Documents \1861.kwp page -7- of 2-5 � -!`A.a . -7oo (a � Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters AEVSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG. Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1.24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN Date: 8/24/00 (display: static /seismic) By: lec Soil Parameters A_ C DSf X--cj Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Wall Ht: 20.33 ft = 11 1.50 ft Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 iu T y DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= - Ta Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, 1 inch minus Sliding Overturning -_ - o 2.40/1.23 Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g _ Calculated Bearing Pressure: 2926/5821 psf Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Eccentricity at base: -0.19 ft/3.55 ft Allow. Peak Serviceablity Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: Layer Height Length Tension _/4 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: Tci 1.50/1.13 11 18.00 16.0 216 2 2 SG200 933/1555 ok Connection Peak: N/A > 10/ > 1> 10 ok 1.5011.13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids N/A >10/ >10 ok 9 14.00 16.0 4931739 SG200 933/1555 ok 104111388 ok Tull RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 690 0.95 SG300 3005 1.61 1.10 1.10 1542 1.50 1028 0.90 0.95 SG500 4608 1.61 1.10 1.10 2365 1.50 1577 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (4 +72.00 to 5 +44.75) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 20.33 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSiope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 It Results: Sliding Overturning Bearing hear Bending Factors of Safety: 2.40/1.23 4.65/1.80 12.28/7.52 7.88 2.21 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 2926/5821 psf Eccentricity at base: -0.19 ft/3.55 ft Allow. Peak Serviceablity Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated Tension Connection Connection Pullout Layer Height Length Tension _/4 Reinf. Tvoe Tal Tci Tsc FS 11 18.00 16.0 216 2 2 SG200 933/1555 ok 799/1066 ok N/A > 10/ > 1> 10 ok 10 16.00 16.0 337/564 SG200 933/1555 ok 100811344 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok 9 14.00 16.0 4931739 SG200 933/1555 ok 104111388 ok N/A >10/ > 10 ok 8 12.00 16.0 6491915 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 7 10.00 16.0 805/1091 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041 /1388 ok N/A >10 / >10 ok 6 8.00 16.0 790/ 1096 SG200 933 /1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/>10 ok 5 6.67 16.0 710/ 1029 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10 ok 4 5.33 16.0 779/ 1112 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10 ok 3 4.00 16.0 848/1194 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 2 2.67 16.0 918/1277 SG300 1028/1713 ok 1388/1851 ok N/A >10 />10ok 1 1.33 16.0 732/ 1878w SG500 1577/2628 ok 1533/2044 ok N/A >10 / >10 o Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 73 %) FoS PO= >1,0/>,o SG500: 1.78 sy /ft SG300: 1.78 sy /ft - QROFESG,47 SG200: 16.00 sy /ft �QQOE a No. 36292 � E,&P q�w al ;b 'nlq Ci V I\- �V, lF OF CAO Pref: Embed./ HingeHt./ I- Landmark Engineering Corp. r` C: \My Documents \1861.kwp page S!_ of 2-S KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIC Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology y4'A. .--7;F-to-Aft' 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments SEISMIC DESIGN Date: 8/24/00 Proj. No.: 1861 (display: static /seismic) By: lec Design Parameters Soil Parameters A_ C DSf X__P_cf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 - Retained Fill: 32 0 130 ° 10 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus _ s Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g b _ : -[ 4 Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 It long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 10 I.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (5 +44.75 to 5 +68.00) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 18.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 It long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Sliding Overturning Bearing Shear Bending Factors of Safety: 2.58/1.18 5.38/1.83 13.45/8.39 8.24 2.20 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 2673/5382 psf Eccentricity at base: -0.42 ft/3.44 ft Allow. Peak Serviceablity Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs /ft) Calculated Tension Connection Connection Pullout Laver Height Length Tension Reinf. Tvoe Tal Tel Tsc FS 10 16.00 16.0 138 / 333 SG200 933/1555 ok 765/1020 ok N/A >10/ >1 >10 ok 9 14.67 16.0 226/433 SG200 933/1555 ok 904/1205 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 8 12.67 16.0 413/637 SG200 93311555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 7 10.67 16.0 567/809 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A > 10/ >10 ok 6 8.67 16.0 722 /981 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 5 6.67 16.0 877/1153 SG200 933/1555 ok 104111388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 4 4.67 16.0 849/1142 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 3 3.33 16.0 757/1062 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 2 2.00 16.0 825/1142 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1 0.67 16.0 627/1222w SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 67 %) FoS PO= >10/>10 SG200: 17.78 sy /ft (/ C Qr<tOPES h4 y � W No. rr 36292 � ExP `rl Clv1\- 4lf !c /3c)/o y .P Pref Embed./ Hin eHt./ OF I - Landmark Engineering Corp. CAOO�� CAMy Documents11861.kwp page q of 25 Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DES]t> Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1. 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) Soil Parameters A- c osf y__P_Cf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) L E Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.5011.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Date: 8/24/00 By: lec 9 5 Bearing 2.00/1.50 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (5 +68.00 to 5 +82.25) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Sliding Wall Ht: 16.00 it embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long 2.50/1.17 Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: 9.92 Sliding Overturnine Factors of Safety: Serviceablity 2.50/1.17 5.19/1.81 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 2366/4836 psf Pullout Eccentricity at base: -0.34 ft/3.07 ft Tcl Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs /ft) Calculated 765/1020 Tension Laver Height Length Tension Reint Tyne Tal 9 14.00 14.0 138 / 314 SG200 933/1555 ok 8 12.67 14.0 226/415 SG200 933/1555 ok 7 10.67 14.0 413/620 SG200 933/1555 ok 6 8.67 14.0 567/793 SG200 933/1555 ok 5 6.67 14.0 722/966 SG200 933/1555 ok 4 4.67 14.0 720/982 SG200 933/1555 ok 3 3.33 14.0 653 /928 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 2.00 14.0 722/ 1009 SG200 933/1555 ok 1 0.67 14.0 550/1090w SG200 933/1555 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 59 % ) SG200: 14.00 sy /ft Bearine Shear Bending 13.53/8.43 9.92 2.20 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tcl Tsc FS 765/1020 ok N/A >10 / >1 0ok 904/1205 ok N/A > 10/ > 10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 />10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok FoS PO= >10/>10 �ROF Ess)ny4` No, 36292 C1V1\- �w OF CAUFoe C: \My Documents \]861.kwp page * of 25 KFYS _`_NE Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG. Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1.24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) Soil Parameters C DSf Y-cf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands psf Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, 1 inch minus DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.5011.13 Uncertainties: 1.5011.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Date: 8/24/00 By: lec G .--7 ^U 2 3 Bearing: 2,00/1.50 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tull RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (5 +82.25 to 5 +96.50) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone . Factors of Safety: Wall Ht: 14.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long psf Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Slidine Overturnine Factors of Safety: 2.43/1.15 5.01/1.77 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 2056/4318 psf >10 / >110ok Eccentricity at base: -0.26 ft/2.72 ft >10 / >10ok Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated 1041/1388 ok N/A Tension Laver Height Length Tension _/3 Reinf.Tvoe Tat 7 12.00 12.0 138 2 2 SG200 933/1555 ok 6 10.67 12.0 226/425 SG200 933/1555 ok 5 8.67 12.0 413/636 SG200 933/1555 ok 4 6.67 12.0 567/814 SG200 933/1555 ok 3 4.67 12.0 722/992 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 2.67 12.0 877/ 1170 SG200 933/1555 ok 1 0.67 12.0 542 / 1165w SG200 933/1555 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 58 % ) SG200: 9.33 sy /ft C: \My Documents \l861.kwp Bearing Shear Bendine 13.66/8.46 8.24 2.20 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tel Tsc FS 765/1020 ok N/A >10 / >110ok 904/1205 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 104111388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1389 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok FoS PO= >10/>10 No. 36292 GXP 03010 OF CP�IFO� page J1 of 25 �.fµs -"To Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIk. Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1.24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static/seismic) Soil Parameters A- C DSf Y---P-Cf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, 1 inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Date: 8/24/00 By: lec Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTD$ FS TO Ci Cds SG200 2725 761 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (5+96.50 to 6 +10.75) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter. 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 12.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Sliding Overturning Bearing Shear Bending Factors of Safety: 2.38/1.13 4.86/1.72 13.87/8.45 9.92 2.20 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1741/3858 psf Eccentricity at base: -0.20 ft/2.41 ft Allow. Peak Servieeablity Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated Tension Connection Connection Pullout Laver Height Length Tension ReinE Type Taal Tel Tsc FS 6 10.00 10.0 138/302 S0200 933/1555 ok 76511020 ok N/A >10i->10 ok 5 8.67 10.0 226/408 SG200 933/1555 ok 90411205 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok 4 6.67 10.0 413/622 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 />10ok 3 4.67 10.0 567/803 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok 2 2.67 10.0 722/985 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok 1 0.67 10.0 464 / 1009w SG200 933//555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 50 %) FoS PO= >101>10 SG200: 6.67 sy /ft Embed./ H Landmark 'OfESS/ yq No. 36292 �I /lF 01V1-E 0�'�P ty�OF CA�� 0 C: \My Documents \1861.kwp page 12_ of 25 - 64-4.4 - -7o- Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters Soil Parameters Reinforced Fill: Retained Fill: Foundation Fill: KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIC Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1.24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) -b- C psf Y---Rc-f 32 0 130 32 0 130 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overtuming: 2.00/1 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1 Connection Peak: 1.5011 Date: 8/24/00 By: lec _ 4 4 3 i� 2 1 50 Bearing: 2.00/1.50 13 13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tull RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 ] 399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall I (6 +10.75 to 6 +28.50) Case: Case I Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 10.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Slidine Factors of Safety: 2.49/1.21 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1465/2770 psf Eccentricity at base: -0.25 ft/1.80 ft Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated Laver Height Length Tension 5 8.00 9.0 138 / 292 4 6.67 9.0 226/398 3 4.67 9.0 413/612 2 2.67 9.0 567/793 1 0.67 9.0 387 / 843w Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): SG200: 5.00 sy /fl >10 / >10 ok Embed./ Overturning 5.35/1,95 Allow. Tension Reinf. Type Tal SG200 933 /1555 ok SG200 933/1555 ok SG200 SG200 SG200 933/1555 ok 933/1555 ok 933/1555 ok ( Efficiency- 41 %) Bearing Shear Bendine 15.15!10.33 11.76 2.20 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tel Tsc FS 765/1020 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 904/1205 ok N/A > 10/ >10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/>10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 />10 ok FoS PO= >10/9.39 eRpFESSr0A, - No. 3622 P t/3 j x o q�z �i sr cIVl� �P Ole OF OAOFG C \My Documents \1861.kwp page 13 of 25 Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIC Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) Soil Parameters —L C Of x-�f Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Date: 8/24/00 By: lec 2 •1 Bearing: 2.00/ 1.50 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 175 1399 1.50 933 0.90 795 Analysis: Wall 1 (6 +28.50 to 6 +55.00) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 8.00 ft embedment: 1.50 R BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Sliding Overturning Factors of Safety: 2.47/1.19 5.26/1.91 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1148/2276 psf Tcl Tsc Eccentricity at base: -0.19 ft/1.49 ft 835/1 1 13 ok N/A Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs /ft) Calculated >10/6.23 ok Tension Laver Height Length Tension _/453 Reinf. Type Tat 3 <1.37 5.33 7.0 260 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 3.33 7.0 361 /597 SG200 933/1555 ok 1 1.33 7.0 413 / 897w SG200 933/1555 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 44 % ) SG200: 2.33 sy /ft PreF Embed./ Hingel-10 C:\My Documents\ I 861.kwp Bearing Shear Bending 15.91/10.81 15.77 1.37 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tcl Tsc FS 835/1 1 13 ok N/A 8.88/5.10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/6.23 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A 8.87/6.10 ok FoS PO= 9.29/5,16 � pFESS /a,I,Q �F S CO_ �n No. 36292 r ExP b /3o�oy � CIVI\- ?i \0F CAL\F "" page Iti of ?} RETAII<ING WALL SYSTEMS Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG. Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN Date: 8/24/00 (display: static /seismic) By: lec Soil Parameters -C c osf Y-�cf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 _ Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 5 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands 3 Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g 2 Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) - = 1 Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal C Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (6 +55.00 to 6 +83.50) Case: Case I Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Factors of Safety: Wall Ht: 10.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long psf Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Slidin¢ Overturning Factors of Safety: 2.49/1.21 5.35/1.95 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1465/2770 psf >10 / >1 0ok Eccentricity at base: -0.25 11/1.80 ft > 10/ > 10 ok Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated 1041/1388 ok N/A Tension Laver Height Length Tension Reinf. Type Tal 5 8.00 9.0 138/292 SG200 933/1555 ok 4 6.67 9.0 226/398 SG200 933/1555 ok 3 4.67 9.0 413/612 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 2.67 9.0 567/793 SG200 933/1555 ok 1 0.67 9.0 387 / 843w SG200 933/1555 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency* 41 % ) SG200: 5.00 sy /ft C: \My Documents \1861.kwp Bearing Shear Bending 15.15/10.33 11.76 2.20 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tcl Tse FS 765/1020 ok N/A >10 / >1 0ok 904/1205 ok N/A > 10/ > 10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok NIA >10 / >10ok FoS PO= > 10/9.39 Landmark Me. 36292 'G xP (o/ 30/ctl psi F crvl� �P page ISof25_. Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIL Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) Soil Parameters A_ c usf y_f Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Date: 8/24/00 By: lec � 4 3 Analysis: Wall 1 (6 +83.50 to 7 +10.50) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 12.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: IS idine Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Eccentricity at base: -0.20 ft/2.41 It Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Laver Height Length Tension _/466 ReinE Type Tal Tull RFcr RFd RFId LTDS FS Tal _'t Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (6 +83.50 to 7 +10.50) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 12.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: IS idine Overturnine Factors of Safety: 2.38/1.13 4.86/1.72 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1741/3858 psf Eccentricity at base: -0.20 ft/2.41 It Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated Tension Laver Height Length Tension _/466 ReinE Type Tal 5<1.37 9.33 10.0 260 SG200 933/1555 ok 4 7.33 10.0 361 /598 SG200 933/1555 ok 3 5.33 10.0 516/785 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 3.33 10.0 6711971 SG200 933/1555 ok 1 1.33 10.0 557 / 1310w SG200 933/1555 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency- 60 % ) SG200: 5.56 sy /ft Illearine Shear B n in 13.87/8.45 10.44 1.37 Peak Serviceability Connection Connection TO Tsc 835/1113 ok N/A 104111388 ok N/A 104111388 ok N/A 1041/1388 ok N/A 1041/1388 ok N/A FoS PO= > 10/8.61 Pullout FS > 10%9.26 ok >10 / >10ok >10 / >10ok >10 / >10ok >10 / >10ok `D Na 36292 E x r (V13610 � 8j CI V l5- ��v Alf OF CAO\ eerine Coro. C:\My Documents\]861.kwp page _& of 25 Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIC Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static/seismic) Soil Parameters c Of �gcf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.5011.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Date: 8/24100 By: lec _6 4 - 2 Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFer RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 SG500 4608 1.61 1.10 1.10 2365 1.50 1577 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall l (7 +10.50 to 7 +30.00) Case: Case I Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 14.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL - 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Sliding Overturnine Factors of Safety: 2.43/1.15 5.01/1.77 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 2056/4318 psf FS Eccentricity at base: -0.26 ft/2.72 ft >10/>10 ok Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated 104111388 ok N/A Tension Laver Height Length Tension Reinf. Tyne Tal 6 <1.37 11.33 12.0 215/442 SG200 93311555 ok 5 10.00 12.0 269/514 SG200 933/1555 ok 4 8.00 12.0 464/738 SG200 933 11555 ok 3 6.00 12.0 619/920 SG200 93311555 ok 2 4.00 12.0 774/1102 SG200 933/1555 ok 1 2.00 12.0 632 / 1807w SG500 15772628 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 61 % ) SG500: 1.33 sy /ft SG200: 6.67 sy /ft Pref Embed./ HingeHt./ . I - Bearing Shear Bending 13.66/8.46 9.34 1.37 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tel Tsc FS 835/1113ok N/A >10/>10 ok 973/1298 ok N/A >10/ > 10 ok 104111388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/>10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok 15332044 ok N/A >l0 / >10 ok FoS PO= >10/>10 � Q�rcaarpd,4! e! ism Na 36292 r^ ExP (o /3 0 ,rf OF CAIUE ineerinv Coro. C:\My Documents \l861.kwp page I% of Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIL Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: statictseismic) Soil Parameters _41- c usf L,20f Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, 1 inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) [ Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.5011.13 Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Date: 8124/00 By: lec Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Serviceability: N/A Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS F_ Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 761 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 SG300 3005 1.61 1.10 1.10 1542 1.50 1028 0.90 0.95 SG500 4608 1.61 1.10 1.10 2365 1.50 1577 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (7 +30.00 to 7 +74.25) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 16.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL - 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Sliding Overturnine Factors of Safety: 2.50/1.17 5.19/1.81 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 2366/4836 psf FS Eccentricity at base: -0.34 11/3.07 ft >10 / >1 >10 ok Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated 1041/1388 ok N/A Tension Laver Height Length Tension ReinE Tyne Tal 7 <1.37 13.33 14.0 260 / 498 SG200 933/1555 ok 6 11.33 14.0 361 /623 SG200 933/1555 ok 5 9.33 14.0 516/801 SG200 933/1555 ok 4 7.33 14.0 671 /980 SG200 933/1555 ok 3 5.33 14.0 825/ 1159 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 3.33 14.0 980 / 1337 SG300 1028/1713 ok 1 1.33 14.0 708 / 1720w SG500 1577/2628 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 68 % ) SG500: 1.56 sy /ft SG300: 1.56 sy /ft SG200: 7.78 sy /ft Be ring Shear Bending 13.53/8.43 7.37 1.37 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tcl Tsc FS 835/1113 ok N/A >10 / >1 >10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 />10ok 1388/1851 ok N/A >10 />10ok 1533/2044 ok N/A >10 / >10 ok FoS PO= >10/>10 o rc^ z Na 36292 CAPlo�3p�ay C1Vi\- �P OF CA';" . I - Landmark CAMy Documents \1861.kwp page I& of 25 Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG. Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN Date: 8124/00 (display: static /seismic) By: lec Soil Parameters A- C 21f Y--P-Cf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 6 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 5 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands 4 Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus - 3 Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g - -- z � Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.5011.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 7.50 933 0.90 0.95 SG500 4608 1.61 1.10 1.10 2365 1.50 1577 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (7 +7415 to 7 +98.25) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 14.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset - 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Sliding Overturning Factors of Safety: 2.43/1.15 5.01/1.77 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 2056/4318 psf >10 / >1 0ok Eccentricity at base: -0.26 1112.72 ft >10 />10ok Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated 1041/1388 ok N/A Tension Laver Height Length Tension -/393 Reinf.Tvoe To] 6 12.00 12.0 174 SG200 93311555 ok 5 10.00 12.0 310/556 SG200 933/1555 ok 4 8.00 12.0 4641739 SG200 933/1555 ok 3 6.00 12.0 619/921 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 4.00 12.0 774/1104 SG200 93311555 ok 1 2.00 12.0 632 / 1809w SG500 157712628 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 61 % ) SG500: 1.33 sy /ft SG200: 6.67 sy /ft Embed./ Bearing Shear Bendine 13.6618.46 9.34 2.20 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tcl Tsc FS 765/1020 ok NIA >10 / >1 0ok 973/1298 ok N/A >10 />10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 />10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1533/2044 ok N/A >10 / >10ok FoS PO= > 10/> 10 8-SION `. No. 56292 rn E- xP ro�3o�6� ! CIVIC- �P 8 qTf OF CANE C:VNy Documents\I861.kwp page I.1_, of 25 KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIL Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments SEISMIC DESIGN Case: Case 1 Date: 8/24/00 Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Proj. No.: 1861 (display: static/seismic) Factors of Safety: By: lec embedment: 1.50 ft Design Parameters psf Surcharge: LL - 0 psf uniform surcharge DL - 0 psf uniform surcharge Soil Parameters A_ c DSf L-Amf Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs /ft) Calculated 1041/1388 ok N/A Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Laver Height Length Tension - - 6 Tel Retained Fill: 32 0 130 SG200 -' 5 5 9.33 10.0 183/363 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 933/1555 ok - 4 SG200 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands 3 5.33 10.0 516/752 g 933/1555 ok Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus SG200 - , -2 1 1.33 10.0 464 / 1270w Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g 93311355 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Efficiency= 50 % ) SG200: 6.67 sy /ft Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (7 +98,25 to 8 +13.25) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Factors of Safety: Wall Ht: 12.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 R long psf Surcharge: LL - 0 psf uniform surcharge DL - 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Slidine Overturnine Factors of Safety: 2.38/1.13 4.86/1.72 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1741/3858 psf >10i->10 ok Eccentricity at base: -0.20 ft/2.41 ft >10 / >10 ok Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs /ft) Calculated 1041/1388 ok N/A Tension Laver Height Length Tension Rein f. Type Tel 6 10.67 10.0 77 / 240 SG200 933/1555 ok 5 9.33 10.0 183/363 SG200 933/1555 ok 4 7.33 10.0 361 /570 SG200 933/1555 ok 3 5.33 10.0 516/752 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 3.33 10.0 671 /935 SG200 933/1555 ok 1 1.33 10.0 464 / 1270w S0200 93311355 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 50 % ) SG200: 6.67 sy /ft Bearing Shear Bendin 13.87/8.45 10.44 4.24 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tcl Tsc FS 696/928 ok N/A >10i->10 ok 83511113 ok N/A >10 / >10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10 / >10ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/ >10 ok 1041/1399 ok N/A >10 / >10ok FoS PO= > 10/9.25 ovstFES SIO,yLLL4l � w Na. 36292 si civo- w .. 9l£ OF CA'.\F�� rtnr Corn. C: \My Documents \1861.kwp page 20 of 25 KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIL Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology -To 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments SEISMIC DESIGN Date: 8/24/00 Proj. No.: 1861 (display: static/seismic) By: ]cc 10.60 deg. Design Parameters Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Soil Parameters A_ C DSf � f Wall Ht: 10.00 ft Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 1.50 ft Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 4 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands 3 Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus 1 2 Overturnine Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g 1 5.35/1.95 Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) 1.37 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1465/2770 psf Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Allow. Peak Serviceablity Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Pullout Laver Height Length Tension ReinE Type _/462 Tull RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tat Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (8 +13.25 to 8 +25.25) Case: Case I Unit Type: Standard 21.5' Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 10.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Sliding Overturnine Bearing Shear Bending Factors of Safety: 2.49/1.21 5.35/1.95 15.15110.33 12.62 1.37 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1465/2770 psf Eccentricity at base: -0.25 11/1.80 ft Allow. Peak Serviceablity Reinforcing: (11 & Ibs/ft) Calculated Tension Connection Connection Pullout Laver Height Length Tension ReinE Type _/462 Tal TO Tsc FS 4 <1.37 7.33 9.0 260 SG200 93311555 ok 835/1113 ok N/A >10/8.06 ok 3 5.33 9.0 361 /596 SG200 93311555 ok 104111388 ok N/A >1019.25 ok 2 3.33 9.0 516/783 SG200 933/1555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/9.73 ok 1 1.33 9.0 484 / 1097w SG200 93311555 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A > 10/9.17 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 52 %) FoS PO= >I O/7.66 SG200: 4.00 sy /ft - Landmark C: \My Documents\1861.kwp Oept1FESS /044` No. 36292 rmn ExP (01?40 z if OF page 11 of -E.7 RL•TAfNING WA[.L,SYSTEMS Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESK. Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) Soil Parameters - tv_ C DSf Y---P-c-f Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Dale: 8/24/00 By: lec Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 1 (8 +25.25 to 8 +51.50) Case: Case I Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 8.00 ft embedment: 1.50 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Sliding Overturnin¢ Be ring Shear BendinP Factors of Safety: 2.47/1.19 5.26/1.91 15.91/10.81 15.37 2.20 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1148/2276 psf Eccentricity at base: -0.19 ft/1.49 ft Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs /ft) Calculated Laver Height Length Tension 3 6.00 TO F7-4/ 364 2 4.00 7.0 310/546 1 2.00 7.0 413 / 1037w Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): SG200: 2.33 sy /ft Pref. CAMy Documents \1861.kwp Peak Serviceablity Allow, Connection Tension Reinf. Type Tal SG200 933/1555 ok SG200 933/1555 ok SG200 933/1555 ok ( Efficiency= 44 % ) Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tel Tsc FS 765/1020 ok N/A > 10/5.25 ok 973/1298 ok N/A >10/5.89ok 1041/1388 ok N/A 6.43/4.68 ok FoS PO= 8.06/4.48 - I - Landmark �O �tOFESS /O,14( yQ CE E c gym s ° Na 36292 EXP (o�3c�/o 9rf OF CALIF rU /a. page -a of Z � i� rs>:TAIINING WALL byssEnts Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG. Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static/seismic) Date: 8/24/00 By: lec Soil Parameters A_ c nsf �p�f Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 - Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 - 3 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands = - 2 Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, I inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration - 0.00 g 1 Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) Sliding: 1.5011.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: 2.0011.50 Pullout: 1.5011.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 2 (1 +13.50 to 2 +25.25) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 8.00 ft embedment: 0.67 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 It long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Sliding Overturning Factors of Safety: 147/1.19 5.26/1.91 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1148/2276 psf >10 /5.25 ok Eccentricity at base: -0.19 ft/ 1.49 ft >10/5.89 ok Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated FoS PO= 8.06/4.48 Tension Laver Height Length Tension Reinf. Tyne Tal 3 6.00 7.0 F74-1 364 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 4.00 7.0 310/546 SG200 933/1555 ok 1 2.00 7.0 413 / 1037w SG200 933/1555 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 44 % ) SG200: 2.33 sy /ft Embed./ H C: \My Documents \1861.kwp Bearing Shear Bending 13.73/8.63 15.37 2.20 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tel Tsc FS 765/1020 ok NIA >10 /5.25 ok 973/1298 ok N/A >10/5.89 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A 6.43/4.68 ok FoS PO= 8.06/4.48 E Na. 36292 1;XP fo/4* ! cw\- �41F Of CAUE�P�e page 130 of 2,5 Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters .LEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESGGI . Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1, 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) Soil Parameters Al C DSf T-�cf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, 1 inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safe (seismic are 74 f tat' ) Date: 1124/00 By: lec 4 ' �3 2 1 ty o0 s IC Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Bearing: 2.00 /1.50 Pullout: 1.50 /1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.5011.13 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tult RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tat Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 1.10 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 2 (2 +25.25 to 3+01.75) Case: Case 1 Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 9.33 It embedment: 0.67 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 ft; Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Slidine Overturning Factors of Safety: 2.43/1.17 5.0911.83 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1345/2786 psf >10/7.12 ok Eccentricity at base: -0.19 W1.79 ft >10/7.60 ok Allow. Reinforcing: (ft & Ibs/ft) Calculated 1041/1388 ok N/A Tension Laver Height Length Tension Reinf. Tyne Tal 4 7.33 8.0 174/345 SG200 933/1555 ok 3 5.33 8.0 309/516 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 3.33 8.0 464/707 SG200 933/1555 ok 1 1.33 8.0 421 / 1015w SG200 933/1555 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 45 % ) SG200: 3.56 sy /ft Pref Bearine Shear Bending 13.18/7.94 13.67 2.20 Peak Serviceability Connection Connection Pullout Tel is C_ FS 765/1020 ok N/A >10/7.12 ok 97311297 ok N/A >10/7.60 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/8.09 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/7.73 ok FoS PO= >10/6.54 Landmark d. NQt E cO ey' Na. 36292 EXP r'I_ggoy dj CMS- �w qTf OF CA_\F�Q C: \My Documents \1861.kwp page 2Y of 2 5 RCl'AIM�s Project: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Proj. No.: 1861 Design Parameters KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL DESIG Based on Rankine (modified) Methodology 3.0.1. 24 Mar 00 SEISMIC DESIGN (display: static /seismic) Soil Parameters –C c osf __Rcf Reinforced Fill: 32 0 130 Retained Fill: 32 0 130 Foundation Fill: 32 0 130 Reinforce Fill Type: Silts & sands Unit Fill: Crushed Stone, [inch minus Peak Acceleration = 0.15 g Vertical Acceleration = 0.00 g Factors of Safety (seismic are 75% of static) _. Sliding: 1.50/1.13 Overturning: 2.00/1.50 Pullout: 1.50/1.13 Uncertainties: 1.50/1.13 Connection Peak: 1.50/1.13 Date: 8/24/00 By: lec —3 2 Bearing: 2.00/1.50 Serviceability: N/A Reinforcing Parameters: Strata -Grid Geogrids Tull RFcr RFd RFid LTDS FS Tal Ci Cds SG200 2725 1.61 110 1.10 1399 1.50 933 0.90 0.95 Analysis: Wall 2 (3+01.75 to 4 +01.50) Case: Case I Unit Type: Standard 21.5" Wall Batter: 10.60 deg. Leveling Pad: Crushed Stone Wall Ht: 8.00 ft embedment: 0.67 ft BackSlope Geometry: 26.60 deg. slope, 40.00 ft long Surcharge: LL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge DL -- 0 psf uniform surcharge Offset= 40.00 t Load Width= 0.00 ft Results: Slidina Overturning Factors of Safety: 2.47/1.19 5.26/1.91 Calculated Bearing Pressure: 1148/2276 psf 1041/1388 ok N/A Eccentricity at base: -0.19 ft/1.49 fl 1041/1388 ok N/A Allow. Reinforcing: if & Ibs /ft) Calculated Tension Laver Hei ht Length Tension Reinf. Type Tal 3 <1.37 5.33 7.0 260 / 453 SG200 933/1555 ok 2 3.33 7.0 361/597 SG200 933/1555 ok 1 1.33 7.0 413 / 897w SG200 933/1555 ok Reinforcing Quantities (no waste included): ( Efficiency= 44 % ) SG200: 2.33 sy /ft Embed./ Bearing Shear Bending 13.73/8.63 15.77 1.37 Peak Serviceablity Connection Connection Pullout Tel Tsc FS 835/1113 ok N/A 8.88/5.10 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A >10/6.23 ok 1041/1388 ok N/A 8.87/6.10 ok FoS PO= 9.29/5.16 na J36292 i Q 9lf OF C1My Documents11861.kwp page 25 of Z5 t I n n tl�blvb V / /10 /VV ,Iy -fAM� -+ VtlV VI lU, �dytl � 07/18/2000 12:30 8582 171 SAN DIEGO _1 4r , — .. A GTG Company Leighton and Associates PAGE e G E 0 7 E C H N l CAL CC N S U LTA N T S April 26, 2000 Project No 4940028.029 To. Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Encinitas Ranch L.L.C. 9823 Pacific Heights Boulevard, Suite J San Diego, California 92121 i Attention: Mr. Rudy Medina Subject: Update Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments ,EncinitasTovm Center Lot 45, Encinitas, California In accordance with your request and authorization, we have conducted a geotechmcal investigation for the proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion that the site can be improved to receive the proposed improvements. The accompanying report presents a summary of our current investigation and provides geotechnical conclusions and recommendations relative to the proposed site development If you have any questions regarding our report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, _ EttED G£O �L LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. V� N0. 1389 �'Cy . CERTIFIED QJbINEEPING Kevin B. Colson GEOLOGIST Senior Staff Geologi R OF CA0F0 A n � Sean Cate o R ichael R. Stewart,ZtG 1349 (Exp. 12/31 /01) Senior Project Engineer a President/Principal Geologist ,BC /SAC/MRS .... .. CMS Distribution: (4) Addr F CA��F� a.� 't — San Diego, CA 9213 -4425 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, YB206, (619) 292.8030 • FAX (819) 292.0771 • www.leightongao.com 07/18/2000 12:30 85829" -'71 SAN DIEGO PAGE 03 a 4940028.029 li r 6 Segmental Retaining Wall Design I Retaining walls may be considered at several locations on the subject property. Settlement - sensitive structures should be set back from the top of the wall at a minimum distance equal to the wall height As a minimum, segmental wall design should conform to NCMA and the I manufacture's design procedures. Appropriate gootechnical design parameters for the crib -lock or reinforced earth type retaining walls are provided below: Friction angle ofbackfill soils 32 degrees Cohesion 0 psf Weight of backfill soils 125 -130 psf Allowable bearing capacity 2,000 psf (18 inch minimum embedment) • (18 inches minimum width) i1 Expansion index <50 (per UBC Test 18.2) L Temporary backcut per OSHA Seismic Acceleration 0.30g 1 Adequate drainage should be designed behind the wall by the wall design engineer and revtewed by the geotechnical consultant. Typical drainage Includes a PVC pipe surrounded by gravel and filter cloth with outlets into positive drainage facilities. Retaining wall back cuts should be observed and geologically mapped by the geotechnical consultant during construction. The purpose for this mapping is to substantiate the geological conditions that we have assumed in our analysis. In order to expedite the geologic mapping of these temporary slopes by our field geologist, we recommend that the grading contractor trim these cuts with a slope board as they are excavated. In general, to reduce the potential for back cut failures, we recommend that the stability fill excavation and embankment be planned to minimize the time the back cut remains open and unsupported by compactedfill. 6 7 Genchernk-,al Considerations Geochemical screening of the onsite soils was performed The screening is meant to serve as an indicator for the design professionals in determining the level of input necessary from a qualified corrosion engineer. Review of geochemical test results by a corrosion engineer is recommended. Concrete in direct contact with soil or water that contains a high concentration of soluble sulfates can be subject to chemical deterioration commonly known as "sulfate attack." Soluble sulfate results (Appendix C) indicated a soluble sulfate content less than 0.1 percent. Uniform Building Code Table 19 -A -4 provides minimum concrete design requirements based on sulfate exposure conditions. W } 12 'Llo UPDATE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, PROPOSED POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS, ENCINITAS TOWN CENTER LOT 45, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA Project No. 4940028 -029 April 26, 2000 Prepared For POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS ENCINITAS TOWN CENTER, LLC 9823 Pacific Heights Boulevard, Suite J San Diego, California 92121 16A A GTG Company Leighton and Associates GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS April 26, 2000 Project No. 4940028 -029 To: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Encinitas Ranch L.L.C. 9823 Pacific Heights Boulevard, Suite ! San Diego, California 92121 Attention: Mr. Rudy Medina Subject: Update Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed PoinsettiaRidge Apartments, Encinitas Town Center Lot 45, Encinitas, California In accordance with your request and authorization, we have conducted a geotechnical investigation for the proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion that the site can be improved to receive the proposed improvements. The accompanying report presents a summary of our current investigation and provides geotechnical conclusions and recommendations relative to the proposed site development. If you have any questions regarding our report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Kevin B. Colson Senior Staff Geologis Sean CWer3do, R=40 Senior Project Engineer CC KBC /SAC/MRS 1 Distribution: (4) Ad c No. imo `t . ' cERnFIED 64 . ael R. Stewart, ?,T-G 1349 (Exp. 12/31/01) President/Principal Geologist 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, MB205, San Diego, CA 92123 -4425 (858) 292 -8030 • FAX (858) 292 -0771 • www.leighlongeo.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 4940028 -029 Paste 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. ............................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE ANDS COPE ............................................................................. ............................... 1.2 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ....................................................... ............................... 1.3 PREVIOUS SITE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................. ............................... 1.4 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... ............................... 2.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING .............................. ............................... 4 3.0 SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS ......................................................... ............................... 5 3.1 GEOLOGIC SETTING .......................................................................................................... ............................... 5 3.2 SITE - SPECIFIC GEOLOGY .................................................................................................. ............................... 5 3.2.1 Artificial Fill (Map Symbol — AJ) .................................... , ............. . ....................... ............................... S 3.2.2 Tertiary Torrey Sandstone (Map Symbol— TI) ........................................................ ............................... 6 3.3 GEOLOGIC STRUCTURE ..................................................................................................... ..............................6 3.4 LANDSLIDI NG .................................................................................................................... ..............................6 3.5 SURFACE AND GROUND WATER ....................................................................................... ............................... 6 4.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY ................................ _ ..... .. ......... ....................................................................... 7 4.1 FAULTI NG .......................................................................................................................... ..............................7 4.2 SEISMICITY ........................................................................................................................ ..............................7 4.2.1 Shallow Ground Rupture ........................................................................................ ..............................8 4.2.2 Liquefaction and Dynamic Settle ment ................................................................... ............................... 8 4.2.3 Tsunamis and Seiches ............................................................................................ ............................... 9 5.0 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................. ............................... 10 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................. _.. ........ .. ........ ............................................................................. 11 6.1 EARTHWORK 11 61.1 Site Preparation ................................................................................................... ............................... 11 61.1 Excavations and Oversize Material ..................................................................... ............................... 11 61.3 Fill Placement and Compaction .......................................................................... ............................... 12 6.1.4 Removal of Unsuitable Soil s ................................................................................ ............................... 11 6.1.5 Transition Lots ..................................................................................................... ............................... 12 6.2 SLOPE STABILITY 13 6.1.1 Deep- Seared Stabil ity ........................................................................................... ............................... 13 6.2.2 Surficial Slope Stabil ity ........................................................................................ ............................... 13 4940028 -029 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6.3 SURFACE DRAINAGE AND EROSION ............................................................................... ............................... 14 6.4 CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION AND SLAB CONSIDERATIONS ......................................... ............................... 14 64.1 Shallow Spread Footings Foundations ................................................................ ............................... 14 64.2 Fl oorSl abs ............................................................................................................. .............................15 6.4.3 Concrete Fl otwork ............................................................................................... ............................... 15 64.4 Settlement ............................................................................................................... .............................15 6.5 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES ......................................................................................... ............................... 16 6.6 SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN ......................................................................... ............................... 17 6.7 GEOCHEMICAL CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................... ............................. 17 6.8 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN ................................................................................. ............................... 18 6.9 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION ...................................................................................... ............................... 19 6.10 PLAN REVIEW ................................................................................................................ ............................... 19 7.0 LIMITATIONS ..............................................................................:.................................... .._............................ 20 Tables Table 1 — Seismic Parameters for Active Faults — Page 7 Table 2 — Recommended Wire-Mesh Reinforcement of Concrete Flatwork — Page 15 Figures Figure 1 — Site Location Map — Page 2 Plate Plate 1 — Geotechnical Map — In Pocket Appendices Appendix A — References Appendix B — Boring Logs Appendix C — Laboratory Data Analysis Appendix D — Seismic Analyses Appendix E — General Earthwork and Grading Specifications ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope 4940028 -029 This report presents the results of our updated geotechnical investigation for the proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments to be situated within Lot 45 of the Encinitas Town Center development, in Encinitas, California. The purpose of our investigation was to identify and evaluate the existing significant geotechnical conditions present at the site and to provide preliminary conclusions and geotechnical recommendations relative to the proposed development. Our scope of services included: Review of available pertinent, published and unpublished geotechnical literature and maps. References cited are listed in Appendix A. • Field reconnaissance of the existing onsite geotechnical conditions. • Subsurface exploration consisting of the excavation, logging, and sampling of 10 exploratory borings. The logs of these borings are presented in Appendix B. • Laboratory testing of representative soil samples obtained from the subsurface exploration program. Results of these tests are presented in Appendix C. The results of the moisture /density determinations are included on the boring logs (Appendix B). • Compilation and analysis of the geotechnical data obtained from the field investigation and laboratory testing. • Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, and geotechnical recommendations with respect to the proposed design site grading and general construction considerations. E MAP: Thomas Bros. GeoFinder for Windows, San Diego County, 1995, Page 1147 0 1000 2000 4000 1 "= 2,000' � � Scale in Feet SITE Project No. Poinsettia Ridge Apartments 940028 -029 an Encinitas Town Center LOCATION Lot a5 Date Encinitas, California MAP April 2000 Figure No. 1 a 4940028 -029 1.2 Site Location and Description The proposed development is planned within Lot 45 of the Encinitas Ranch development. The site is located west of the intersection of Garden View Road and Via Cantebria in Encinitas, California (Figure 1, page 2). The roughly triangular- shaped site consists of a previously mass - graded building pad with east - facing 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope on the west side of the lot that ascends approximately 35 -feet to a native hillside. Smaller slopes are also present on the southeast and northeast margins. The site is bounded by an undeveloped natural hillside to the west, Via Cantebria to the southeast and Garden View Road to the northeast. Topographically, the site consists of a gently sloping sheet - graded pad with a gentle fall to a desilting basin located on the northeast side of the site. An asphalt swale drains to the desilting basin along the Garden View Road side of the lot and along a portion of Via Cantebria side. A concrete v -ditch runs along the top of the slope on the west side of the lot. Elevations within the sheet - graded portion of the site vary from approximately 211 feet mean sea level (msl) in the southern corner of the lot to approximately 195 feet msl in the desilting basin on the northeast side of the site. The elevations for the 2:1 slope on the west side of the site range from approximately 210 feet msl at the toe of slope to 256 feet msl at the top of slope. Surface drainage is controlled on the site by surface flow over the majority of the site and by the asphalt - lined brow ditch on the northeast and southeast property lines. 1.3 Previous Site Development The site was previously graded during grading operations for the Encinitas Town Center development (Leighton, 1996). Removal of potentially compressible soils reached a maximum depth of 40 feet on the site in a canyon clean -out in the northern portion of the site. The bedrock soils on the site were overexcavated to reduce future fill differentials on the lot and to supply export soils to other portions of the Encinitas Town Center development. Fill soils were placed under the observation and testing of Leighton and Associates and range from 5 to 40 feet in thickness across the site. The majority of the 2:1 slope on the west side of the lot was constructed as a replacement fill slope with the exception of the southern approximately 200 feet which was constructed as a 2:1 cut slope. A subdrain was placed below the toe of the fill slope and drains in a northerly direction where it has been outletted into the storm drain system north of the site on Garden View Road, 1.4 Proposed Development It is our understanding that the proposed development will include the grading for and construction of an apartment complex consisting of four -story apartment structures, a single story recreation /leasing building, and associated improvements. The lower level of the four -story apartment structure will be used for parking and will be partially buried. Associated concrete flatwork, driveways, and landscaping are also anticipated as part of the development. A segmental retaining wall is proposed in place of the 2:1 replacement fill /cut slope along the westerly side of the property. A` — 1 3 �_ i 4940028 -029 2.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Subsurface exploration was performed on March 30, 2000. Our subsurface exploration consisted of the excavation of ten exploratory borings to approximate depths of 12 to 22 feet below the existing ground surface. The purpose of these borings was to evaluate the physical characteristics and engineering properties of the onsite soils pertinent to the proposed development. The borings allowed evaluation of the soils to be encountered at foundation elevations in proposed cut areas, the general nature of the onsite soils for use as compacted fills, evaluation of the previously placed fill soils, and provided representative samples for laboratory testing. The exploratory borings were logged by a geologist from our firm. Representative drive and bulk samples were obtained for laboratory testing. The approximate locations of the explorations are shown on Plate I (in pocket). After logging and sampling, the borings were backfilled. Laboratory testing performed on representative soil samples included: collapse tests, direct shear, maximum density determination, expansion index, moisture/densities, and geochemical screening of the subsurface soils. A discussion of the laboratory tests performed and a summary of the laboratory test results are presented in Appendix C. In -situ moisture and density test results are provided on the boring logs (Appendix B). 1 �^ -4 — 4940028 -029 3.0 SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS 3.1 Geologic Setting The site is located in the coastal section of the Peninsular Range Province, a geomorphic province with a long and active geologic history throughout Southern California. Throughout the last 54 million years, the area known as "San Diego Embayment" has undergone several episodes of marine inundation and subsequent marine regression, resulting in the deposition of a thick sequence of marine and nonmarine sedimentary rocks on the basement rock of the Southern California batholith. Gradual emergence of the region from the sea occurred in Pleistocene time, and numerous wave - cut platforms, most of which were covered by relatively thin marine and nonmarine terrace deposits, formed as the sea receded from the land. Accelerated fluvial erosion during periods of heavy rainfall, coupled with the lowering of the base sea level during Quaternary times, resulted in the rolling hills, mesas, and deeply incised canyons which characterize the lndforms we see in the general site area today. 3.2 Site - Specific Geology Based on our subsurface exploration and review of pertinent geologic literature, maps, and reports the site is underlain by documented compacted fill soils and the Torrey Sandstone. The approximated areal limits of each of the geologic units are indicated on the Geotechnical Map (Plate 1). A brief description of the geologic units encountered on the site is presented below. 3.2.1 Artificial Fill (Mar) Symbol – Aft Documented compacted artificial fill soils (Leighton, 1996, Appendix A) placed during rough - grading operations for the Encinitas Town Center development are present at the surface of the entire Lot 45 site. These fill soils were placed as part of the mass grading of the Encinitas Town Center development and range in thickness from 5 to 40 feet across the site. The fill soils were derived from on site materials and soils generated from grading in other areas of the Encinitas Town Center development. The fill soils are characterized by light brown to brown, generally damp, dense, silty fine to medium sand. The fill soils were tested to have a very low expansion potential (Appendix Q. 5 ' — 4940028 -029 3.2.2 Tertiary Torrey Sandstone (Map Symbol —Tt1 The Tertiary-aged Torrey Sandstone was encountered in exploratory borings B -7 and B- 8 depths of 13 and 20 feet below the ground surface. In addition, the Torrey Sandstone is exposed in the natural bluffs and ridges along the western property boundary and was encountered underlying the documented fill soils during site grading. The majority of the Torrey Sandstone, as encountered, consists of light gray to light yellow- brown, silty, fine -to coarse - grained, sandstone. 3.3 Geoloeic Structure Based on our field observations during our update investigation and site grading, the Torrey Sandstone generally consists of massive sandstone units with bedding attitudes within a few degrees of horizontal. Localized steeper bedding which can be attributed to cross bedding can be observed in areas. 3.4 Landslidin¢ No ancient landslides have been mapped on the site and no evidence of landsliding was observed during our site investigation. 3.5 Surface and Ground Water Ground water was not observed in our excavations, nor was it encountered during grading operations for Lot 45. However ground water levels will fluctuate during periods of high precipitation. Ground water is not expected to impact the proposed development if the recommendations regarding drainage outlined in this report are implemented. -6 J 4.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY 4.1 Faultin 4940028 -029 Our discussion of faults on the site is prefaced with a discussion of California legislation and policies concerning the classification and land -use criteria associated with faults. By definition of the California Mining and Geology Board, an active fault is a fault that has had surface displacement within Holocene time (about the last 11,000 years). The state geologist has defined a potentially active fault as any fault considered to have been active during Quaternary time (last 1,600,000 years). This definition is used in delineating Earthquake Fault Zones as mandated by the Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act and as subsequently revised in 1997. The intent of this act is to assure that unwise urban development and certain habitable structures do not occur across the traces of active faults. The subject site is not included within any Earthquake Fault Zones as created by the Alquist - Priolo Act (Hart, 1997). Our review of available geologic literature (Appendix A) indicates that there are no known major or active faults on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. The nearest active regional fault is the Rose Canyon Fault Zone located approximately 4.3 miles west of the site. 4.2 Seismicity The site can be considered to lie within a seismically active region, as can all of southern California. Site specific evaluation of the earthquake hazard was performed using a deterministic and a probabilistic approach. A summary of our deterministic evaluation is provided in Table 1. Table 1 Seismic Parameters for Active Faults (Blake, 1996 and 1998, CDMG, 1996) Maximum Credible Earthquake Distance from Moment Peak Ground Acceleration Fault Fault to Site Magnitude (g) Rose Canyon 4.3 miles (7 km) 6.9 0.64 Newport- 1 I miles (18 km) 6.9 0.36 Inglewood Elsinore- 26 miles (42 km) 6.8 0.18 Temecula Elsinore - 26miles (42 km) 7.1 0.21 Julian 1 -NIMIE- - 7 ' a 4940028 -029 Based on a deterministic approach, Table 1 presents the peak ground acceleration that we postulate could be produced by the maximum credible earthquake. The maximum credible earthquake is defined as the maximum event that a fault is capable of producing considering the known tectonic setting. Site - specific seismic parameters reported are the distances to the causative faults, earthquake magnitudes, and expected peak ground accelerations. As indicated in Table 1, the Rose Canyon fault zone is considered to have the most significant affect at the site from a design standpoint. The maximum credible earthquake is expected to produce a peak ground surface acceleration at the site of 0.64g. The Rose Canyon Fault Zone is considered a type B seismic source according to ICBO, 1997, Table 16 -U. The earthquake source data used for analysis of the ground motion was obtained from the California Division of Mining and Geology (CDMG, Open File Report 96 -08). A summary printout of the deterministic analysis is provided in Appendix D. The effect of seismic shaking may be mitigated by adhering to the Uniform Building Code and state -of -the -art seismic design parameters of the Structural Engineers Association of California. The site is located within Seismic Zone 4 of the Uniform Building Code (ICBO, 1997, Figure 16 -2). The soil profile designation for the site is considered to be type Sp per the 1997 UBC, Table 16 -J. Secondary effects that can be associated with severe ground shaking following a relatively large earthquake include shallow ground rupture, soil liquefaction and dynamic settlement, seiches and tsunamis. These secondary effects of seismic shaking are discussed in the following sections. 4.2.1 Shallow Ground Rupture Ground rupture because of active faulting is not likely to occur on site due to the absence of known active faults. Cracking due to shaking from distant seismic events is not considered a significant hazard, although it is a possibility at any site. 4.2.2 Liquefaction and Dynamic Settlement Liquefaction and dynamic settlement of soils can be caused by strong vibratory motion due to earthquakes. Both research and historical data indicate that loose, saturated, granular soils are susceptible to liquefaction and dynamic settlement. Liquefaction is typified by a total loss of shear strength in the affected soil layer, thereby causing the soil to liquefy. This effect may be manifested by excessive settlements and sand boils at the ground surface. The onsite Artificial Fill and Torrey Sandstone materials encountered during our investigation are not considered liquefiable due to their physical characteristics and unsaturated condition. The Torrey Sandstone, which may be below the water table at depth, is not considered liquefiable due to its very high- density characteristics and cemented nature. g �'8i Ims 4940028 -029 4.2.3 Tsunamis and Seiches Based on the distance between the site and large, open bodies of water, and the elevation of the site with respect to sea level, the possibility of seiches and /or tsunamis is considered to be very low. 9 �� 4940028 -029 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of our preliminary geotechnical investigation of the site, it is our opinion that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the following conclusions and recommendations are incorporated into the project plans and specifications. The following is a summary of the significant geotechmical factors that we expect may affect development of the site. • Active faults are not known to exist on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. A peak ground acceleration of 0.64g is postulated as a result of the maximum credible earthquake along the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. • Based on subsurface exploration of the artificial fill soils and formational materials present on the site, we anticipate that these materials should be generally rippable with conventional heavy -duty earthwork equipment. • Based on laboratory testing and visual classification, on site soil materials generally possess very low to low expansion potential. • Laboratory test results indicate the onsite soils have a negligible potential for sulfate attack on concrete and have a severe risk for acid (pH) attack on concrete. A corrosion engineer should be consulted to provide measures to mitigate corrosivity. The existing onsite soils appear to be suitable material for use as compacted fill provided they are relatively free of organic material, debris, and rock fragments larger than 6 inches in maximum dimension. • Ground water was not encountered during our investigation, nor is ground water anticipated to be encountered during site excavation and construction. ■ Cut -fill transition conditions should be identified during a review of the site grading plans. If transitional conditions are identified, we recommend undercuttingthe cut areas below building pads to provide at least 4 feet of fill beneath all footings and settlement sensitive improvements. w 1 � � Ip_ _ 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Earthwork 4940028 -029 We anticipate that earthwork at the site will consist of site preparation, excavation, and fill operations. We recommend that earthwork on the site be performed in accordance with the following recommendations and the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading included in Appendix E. In case of conflict, the following recommendations shall supersede those in Appendix E. 6.1.1 Site Preparation Prior to grading, all areas to receive structural fill, engineered structures, or hardscape should be cleared of surface and subsurface obstructions, including any existing debris and undocumented or loose fill soils, and stripped of vegetation. Removed vegetation and debris should be properly disposed off site. All areas to receive fill and/or other surface improvements should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, brought to near - optimum moisture conditions, and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction based on ASTM Test Method D1557. 6.1.2 Excavations and Oversize Material Shallow excavations of the onsite materials may generally be accomplished with conventional heavy -duty earthwork equipment. Heavy ripping or breaking will likely be required where cemented and concretionary lenses are encountered in deeper excavation. Excavation for utilities may also be difficult in some areas. Shallow, temporary excavations, such as utility trenches with vertical sides, in the engineered fill and formational materials should remain stable for the period required to construct the utility, provided they are free of adverse geologic conditions. In accordance with OSHA requirements, excavations deeper than 5 feet should be shored or be laid back if workers are to enter such excavations. Temporary sloping gradients should be determined in the field by a "competent person" as defined by OSHA. For preliminary planning, sloping of surficial soils at 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) may be assumed. Excavations greater than 20 feet in height will require an alternative sloping plan or shoring plan prepared by a California registered civil engineer. We do not anticipate significant amounts of oversize material to be generated during excavation of the on site soils. However, if oversized material is encountered during grading, recommendations for treatment of oversize material are included in the attached General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading (Appendix E). In addition, oversize material may be utilized in approved surface applications or hauled off site. 1 4940028 -029 6.1.3 Fill Placement and Compaction All fill soils should be brought to a moisture content at or above optimum and compacted in uniform lifts to at least 90 percent relative compaction based on laboratory standard ASTM Test Method D1557. The optimum lift thickness required to produce a uniformly compacted fill will depend on the type and size of compaction equipment used. In general, fill should be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness. The onsite soils typically possesses a moisture content below optimum and may require moisture conditioning prior to use as compacted fill. Fills placed on slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical) should be keyed and benched into competent formational soils as indicated in the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading presented in Appendix E. Placement and compaction of fill should be performed in general accordance with the current City of Encinitas grading ordinances, sound construction practice, and the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading presented in Appendix E. 6.1.4 Removal of Unsuitable Soils All undocumented fill and loose surficial soils should be removed. These soils should be removed down to competent material. Scattered undocumented fill soils on the order of I to 3 feet thick may be encountered in isolated areas on the site. In general, where not removed by planned grading, we anticipate the depth of removals of undocumented fill to be on the order of I to 3 feet in depth. Loose surficial soils are expected to be encountered during abandonment of the onsite desilting basin. Removals in the desilting basin are estimated to be approximately 5 to 7 feet. 6.1.5 Transition Mitigation If design floor elevations cause a cut/fill transition condition to be exposed near planned footings, the cut areas of the lot should be overexcavated to a minimum depth of 4 feet below the bottoms of proposed foundations and replaced with properly compacted fill. The overexcavation should laterally extend at least 5 feet beyond the building pad area and all associated settlement - sensitive structures. Recompacted soil shall be properly moisture conditioned (as needed) to a near optimum moisture content and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1557). -12- =' _ 4940028 -029 6.2 Slope Stability We understand the finish slopes up to 10 feet in height are planned at inclinations of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). The proposed configuration was analyzed for gross stability. 6.2.1 Deep- Seated Stabilitv Analysis of the proposed slope configuration was performed using the computer program GSlope. Based on our field observations and previous testing of similar materials. strength parameters of � = 33 and c = 100 psf were used for Artificial Fills. Our analysis indicates that the proposed slopes have a calculated factor of safety of 1.5 or greater, with respect to potential deep rotational failure. We recommend that the geotechnical consultant document and geologically map all excavations during grading. The purpose of this mapping is to substantiate the geologic conditions assumed in our analysis. Additional investigation and stability analysis may be required if unanticipated or adverse conditions are encountered. 6.2.2 Surficial Slope Stability Sandy soils in the proposed fill slopes are highly susceptible to erosion and methods of slope stabilization should be implemented as soon as practical to reduce the potential for erosion. Erosion and/or surficial failure potential of fill slopes may be reduced if the following measures are implemented during design and construction of the slopes. - Slope Face Compaction and Finishing We recommend slope faces be compacted by backrolling with a sheepsfoot roller generally at 2- to 3 -foot intervals of slope height. Slope finishing should be achieved by trimming and /or track rolling. - Slope Landscaping and Drainage We recommend that all graded slopes be landscaped with drought - tolerant, slope stabilizing vegetation as soon as possible to minimize the potential for erosion. Erosion control fabric should be considered while vegetation becomes established. In addition to the site drainage recommendations outlined in Section 6.3, design of surface drainage provisions are within the purview of the project civil engineer. 13- a 4940028 -029 6.3 Surface Drainage and Erosion Surface drainage should be controlled at all times. The proposed structure should have appropriate drainage systems to collect roof runoff. Positive surface drainage should be provided to direct surface water away from the structures toward the street or suitable drainage facilities. Positive drainage may be accomplished by providing a minimum 2 percent gradient from the structures. Below grade planters should not be situated adjacent to structures or pavements unless provisions for drainage such as catch basins and drains are made. In general, ponding of water should be avoided adjacent to structures or pavements. To help reduce the potential for excessive erosion of graded slopes, we recommend berms and/or swales be provided along the top of the slopes and lot drainage directed such that surface runoff on the slope faces is minimized. Protective measures to mitigate excessive site erosion during construction should also be implemented in accordance with the latest City of Encinitas grading ordinances. 6.4 Conventional Foundation and Slab Considerations Foundations and slabs should be designed in accordance with structural considerations and the following recommendations. These recommendations assume that the soils encountered within 5 feet of pad grade have a very low to low potential for expansion. If highly expansive soils are encountered and selective grading cannot be accomplished, additional foundation design may be necessary. 6.4.1 Shallow Spread Footings Foundations The proposed structures may be supported by conventional, continuous perimeter, or isolated spread footings. Footings should extend a minimum of 24 inches beneath the lowest adjacent finish grade. At these depths, footings founded in properly compacted fill soils may be designed for a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. The allowable pressures may be increased by one -third when considering loads of short duration such as wind or seismic forces. The minimum recommended width of footings is 18 inches for continuous footings and 24 inches for square or round footings. Footings should be designed in accordance with the structural engineer's requirements and have a minimum reinforcement of four No. 5 reinforcing bars (two top and two bottom). We recommend a minimum horizontal setback distance from the face of slopes for all structural footings and settlement - sensitive structures. This distance is measured from the outside edge of the footing, horizontally to the slope face (or to the face of a retaining wall) and should be a minimum of H/2, where H is the slope height (in feet). The setback should not be less than 10 feet and need not be greater than 15 feet. Please note that the soils within the structural setback area possess poor lateral stability, and improvements (such as retaining walls, sidewalks, fences, and improvements (such as -14 �� 4940028 -029 retaining walls, sidewalks, fences, pavements, etc.) constructed within this setback area may be subject to lateral movement and /or differential settlement. 6.4.2 Floor Slabs The slab -on -grade should be at least 5 inches thick and be reinforced with No. 3 rebars 18 inches on center or No. 4 rebars at 24 inches on center each way (minimum) placed at mid - height in the slab. Slabs should be underlain by a 2 -inch layer of clean sand or clean crushed gravel. If reduction of moisture migration up through the slab is desired, the sand or gravel layer should be additionally underlain by a visqueen moisture barrier underlain by an additional 2 inches of sand or gravel. We recommend control joints be provided across the slab at appropriate intervals as designed by the project architect. The potential for slab cracking may be reduced by careful control of water /cement ratios. The contractor should take appropriate curing precautions during the pouring of concrete in hot weather to minimize cracking of slab$. We recommend that a slipsheet (or equivalent) be utilized if grouted tile, marble tile, or other crack - sensitive floor covering is planned directly on concrete slabs. All slabs should be designed in accordance with structural considerations. If heavy vehicle or equipment loading is proposed for the slabs, greater thickness and increased reinforcing may be required. 6.4.3 Concrete Flatwork To reduce the separation of shrinkage cracks in driveways, sidewalks, patios, or other concrete flatwork, wire mesh reinforcement is suggested. The recommended type of wire mesh reinforcement is presented on Table 2. Table 2 Recommended Wire -Mesh Reinforcement of Concrete Flatwork Low Expansion Potential/Index Recommended Flatwork Reinforcement Very Low to Low (less than 50 6x6 -10 /10 welded -wire mesh per U.B.C. 18 -1 -1 ) . Reinforcement should be placed at mid - height in concrete. Crack control joints should be provided at regular intervals as designed by the project architect. 6.4.4 Settlement The recommended allowable- bearing capacity is based on a maximum total and differential settlement of 1 inch and 3/4 inch, respectively. Since settlements are a function of footing size and contact bearing pressures, some differential settlement can be expected between adjacent columns or walls where a large differential loading condition exists. 1 « -15- �� 4940028 -029 6.5 Lateral Earth Pressures For design purposes, the following lateral earth pressure values for level or sloping backfill are recommended for walls backfilled with very low to low expansion potential. Static Equivalent Fluid Weight(pcf) Conditions Level 2:1 Slope Active 35 55 At -Rest 55 65 Passive 300• (Maximum of3ksf) 150 (slopingdown) Unrestrained (yielding) cantilever walls up to 10 feet in height should be designed for an active equivalent pressure value provided above. In the design of walls restrained from movement at the top (nonyielding) such as basement walls, the at -rest pressures should be used. If conditions other than those covered herein are anticipated, the equivalent fluid pressure values should be provided on an individual case basis by the geotechnical engineer. A surcharge load for a restrained or unrestrained wall resulting from automobile traffic may be assumed to be equivalent to a uniform pressure of 75 psf which is in addition to the equivalent fluid pressure given above. For other uniform surcharge loads, a uniform pressure equal to 0.35q should be applied to the wall (where q is the surcharge pressure in psf). Surcharge from heavy moving trucks can be analyzed by this office once design traffic loads are determined. The wall pressures assume walls are backfilled with free draining materials and water is not allowed to accommodate behind walls. A typical drainage design is contained in Appendix E. Wall backfill should be compacted by mechanical methods to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM D1557). Wall footings should be designed in accordance with the foundation design. recommendations and reinforced in accordance with structural considerations. For all retaining walls, we recommend a minimum horizontal distance from the outside base of the footing to daylight of 10 feet. Lateral soil resistance developed against lateral structural movement can be obtained from the passive pressure value provided above. Further, for sliding resistance, the friction coefficient of 0.33 may be used at the concrete and soil interface. These values may be increased by one -third when considering loads of short duration including wind or seismic loads. The total resistance may be taken as the sum of the frictional and passive resistance provided that the passive portion does not exceed two- thirds of the total resistance. -16- .. 4940028 -029 Segmental Retaining Wall Design Retaining walls may be considered at several locations on the subject property. Settlement - sensitive structures should be set back from the top of the wall at a minimum distance equal to the wall height. As a minimum, segmental wall design should conform to NCMA and the manufacture's design procedures. Appropriate geotechnical design parameters for the crib -lock or reinforced earth type retaining walls are provided below: Friction angle of backfill soils Cohesion Weight of backfill soils Allowable bearing capacity (18 inches minimum width) Expansion index Temporary backcut Seismic Acceleration 32 degrees 0 psf 125 -130 psf 2,000 psf (18 inch minimum embedment) <50 (per UBC Test 18 -2) per OSHA 0.30g Adequate drainage should be designed behind the wall by the wall design engineer and reviewed by the geotechnical consultant. Typical drainage includes a PVC pipe surrounded by gravel and filter cloth with outlets into positive drainage facilities. Retaining wall back cuts should be observed and geologically mapped by the geotechnical consultant during construction. The purpose for this mapping is to substantiate the geological conditions that we have assumed in our analysis. In order to expedite the geologic mapping of these temporary slopes by our field geologist, we recommend that the grading contractor trim these cuts with a slope board as they are excavated. In general, to reduce the potential for back cut failures, we recommend that the stability fill excavation and embankment be planned to minimize the time the back cut remains open and unsupported by compacted fill. 6.7 Geochemical Considerations Geochemical screening of the onsite soils was performed. The screening is meant to serve as an indicator for the design professionals in determining the level of input necessary from a qualified corrosion engineer. Review of geochemical test results by a corrosion engineer is recommended. Concrete in direct contact with soil or water that contains a high concentration of soluble sulfates can be subject to chemical deterioration commonly known as "sulfate attack." Soluble sulfate results (Appendix C) indicated a soluble sulfate content less than 0.1 percent. Uniform Building Code Table 19 -A -4 provides minimum concrete design requirements based on sulfate exposure conditions. -17- _`C 4940028 -029 Minimum resistivity and pH tests were performed on representative samples of subgrade soils (Appendix C). Based on our results, some of the site soils are believed to present a severe potential for acid (pH) attack to concrete. Additional testing should be performed at finish grade to evaluate the soil conditions below the structure. Previous testing on other portions of the Encinitas Town Center have had neutral test results. We recommend further review be performed by a corrosion engineer to provide measures to mitigate corrosion potential. 6.8 Preliminary Pavement Design The appropriate pavement section depends primarily on the type of subgrade soil, shear strength, traffic load, and planned pavement life. Since an evaluation of the characteristics of the actual soils at pavement subgrade cannot be made at this time, we have provided the following range of pavement sections to be used for planning purposes only. The final subgrade characteristics will be highly dependent on the soils present at finish pavement subgrade. We expect that the proposed grading will expose granular soils. For preliminary planning purposes, we have estimated R- Values of 30 to 50 for these materials. Final pavement design should be evaluated based on R -value tests performed upon completion of grading. Provide below are sections for R- Value 30 to 50 subgrade conditions. Pavement Loading Condition Traffic Index (20 -Year Life) Anticipated Pavement Section R- Value =30 R- Value =50 Parking Areas 4.5 3 inches AC over 5 inches Class 2 base 3 inches AC over 4 inches Class 2 base Drive Areas 5.5 3 -1/2 inches AC over 7 inches Class 2 base 3 -1/2 inches AC over 4 inches Class 2 base Truck Driveways 6.5 4 inches AC over 9 inches Class 2 base 4 inches AC over 1 4 inches Class 2 base For concrete pavements and areas subject to heavy truck loading (i.e., trash trucks, moving vans, etc.), we recommend a full depth of Portland Cement Concrete (P.C.C.) section of 7 inches with appropriate steel reinforcement and crack - control joints as designed by the project structural engineer. We recommend that sections be as nearly square as possible. A 3,500 psi mix that produces a 600 psi modulus of rupture should be utilized. All pavement section materials conform to and be placed in accordance with the latest revision of the California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (Caltrans) and American Concrete Institute (ACI) guidelines. The upper 12 inches of subgrade soil and all aggregate base should be compacted to a relative compaction of at least 95 percent (based on ASTM Test Method D 1557) for asphalt pavement and 90 percent for concrete pavements. If pavement areas are adjacent to heavily watered landscape areas, we recommend some measure of moisture control be taken to prevent the subgrade soils from becoming saturated. It is 8- �� 4940028 -029 recommended that the concrete curbing separating the landscaping area from the pavement extend below the aggregate base to help seal the ends of the sections where heavy landscape watering may have access to the aggregate base. 6.9 Construction Observation The recommendations provided in this report are based on preliminary design information and subsurface conditions disclosed by widely spaced excavations. The interpolated subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during constriction. Construction observation of all onsite excavations and field density testing of all compacted fill should be performed by a representative of this office. 6.10 Plan Review Final project drawings should be checked by Leighton 4nd Associates before grading to see that the recommendations in this report are incorporated in project plans. 19- mom 4940028 -029 7.0 LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based in part upon data that were obtained from a limited number of observations, site visits, excavations, samples, and tests. Such information is by necessity incomplete. The nature of many sites is such that differing geotechnical or geological conditions can occur within small distances and under varying climatic conditions. Changes in subsurface conditions can and do occur over time. Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report can be relied upon only if Leighton has the opportunity to observe the subsurface conditions during grading and construction of the project, in order to confirm that our preliminary findings are representative for the site. Z'I "20" _` APPENDIX A REFERENCES Blake, 1996, EQFAULT, Version 2.2. 1998, FRISKSP, Version 3.01. 4940028 -029 CDMG, 1996, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California, Open -File Report, 96 -08. Hart, 1985, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist- Priolo Special Studies Zones Act of 1972 with Index to Special Study Zone Maps, Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42. International Conference of Building Officials, 1994, Uniform Building Code. International Conference of Building Officials, 1997, Uniform Building Code. Leighton and Associates, Inc, 1994, Geotechnical Investigation, Green Valley Phase 1, Encinitas Town Center, Encinitas, California, Project No. 4940028 -01, dated April 20, 1994. -, 1995a, Geotechnical Update and Geotechnical Investigation, Green Valley, Encinitas Ranch, Encinitas, California, Project No. 4940028 -003, dated June 7, 1995. 1995b, As- Graded Report of Rough Grading, Lots 40 and 43 Encinitas Ranch Phase I, Encinitas, California, Project No. 4940028 -006, dated December 22, 1995. 1996a, As- Graded Report of Rough- Grading, Encinitas Town Center Lots 21 Through 33 and Lots 35 Through 37, Encinitas, California, Project No. 4940028 -009, dated February 6, 1996. 1996b, Geotechnical Investigation, Encinitas Ranch -Plaza 2, Encinitas Ranch, TM 94 -066, Encinitas, California, Project No. 4940028 -008, dated May 17, 1996. -, 1996c, Leighton and Associates, Inc., 1996, As- Graded Report of Rough- Grading, Via Cantebria, Leucadia Boulevard, Garden View Road and Lots 44 and 45, Encinitas Ranch Phase 1, Encinitas, California, Project No. 4940028 -006, dated November 8, 1996. Tan S.S., 1996 and Kennedy, M.P., 1996, Geology of the Northern Portion of San Diego County, California, Geology of the Oceanside, San Luis Rey and San Marcos Quadrangles: California Division of Mines and Geology Open File Report 96 -02. MAPS O'Day Consultants, 1996, Grading Plans for Encinitas Ranch Green Valley Units I and III, 33 Sheets dated August 22, 1996, revised November 1 and November 19, 1995. A -1 EOTECHNICAL BORING LL KEY Date Project KEY TO BORING LOG GRAPHICS Drilling Co. Hole Diameter Drive Weight Elevation Top of Hole +/- ft. Ref. or Datum Sheet 1 of Project No. Type of Rig _ 1 Drop _in -. b°J av W +} a01 as " L m ao LJ 0 W + z° z w a U o :30 ou- m L at d L'r- v u o a L O "� L 3� c "} C U �� N rrl cry _tri O� (n GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Logged By Sampled By 0 CL Inorganic clay of low to medium plasticity; gravelly clay, sandy clay, silty clay, Ivan clay Clf Inorganic clay of high plasticity, fat clay OLOH Organic clay, silt orsilty clay-clayey silt mixtures ML Inorganic silt; very fine sand; silty or clayey fine sand; clayey silt with low plasticity W1 CL-ML silt; diatomaccoiss fine sandy or silty wits; elastic silt Low plasticity clay to Gilt mixture S Inorganic n gpr Sample ndic Cal l ML-SM Sandysilt tosiltysand mixture Sample v CL-SC Sandy Clay to clayey Band minute Oro'ud tes SGSM Clayey sand to silty sand mixture 30 wale line ol at dritg SW Well graded sand; gravelly sand, little or no fines SP Poorly graded sand; gravelly sand, little or no fines SM Silty sand; poorly graded sand-silt mixture SC Clayey sand; poorly graded sand-day mixture GW Well graded gravel; gravelsand mixture, little or no fines GP Poorly graded gravel; gravel sand mixture, tittle or no fine IS o GM Silty gravel; gravclsandsilt mixture GC Clayey gravel; gravclsandclay mixture Sandstone Siltstone - _ — °00 d d m Claystone Breccia (angular graucl and cobbles or mattixsupported conglomerate) Conglomerate (rounded gravel and cobble, clastsupported) �s- Igneous granitic or granitic type rock Metavolcanic or metamorphic rock J r L Artificial or man -made fill Asphaltic concrete Portland Cement Concrete sosAtttirrl LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES ,OTECHNICAL BORING Lk- B -1 Date 3 -30 -00 Sheet 1 of I Project Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 205 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES �.-. n U 2 O 0 L L "� N Ul GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION • -+, N� tt- •- 6D N r N OLL rr toU }C A UV W4 6d Ov LJ Z a L 00. �} _01 ca r E c Logged By MDJ Sampled By MDJ W cn ti o U Z U) -205 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (At) 00': Silty fine SAND: light brown, moist, dense (per driller); scattered fine gravel 200 5 1 42 119.0 12.6 y range -brown, moist, medium dense 05': Silty fine SAND: Gray-brown to 0 195 10 2 921 112.5 11.4 010': Silty fine to medium SAND: light brown, mist, very dense; cobble in 10.5' sample may have affected blow counts 190 IS 3 87 114.6 12.2 0 15': Silty fine to medium SAND: Orange -brown to gray, damp, very dense; trace of clay Total Depth = 17 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling Ractfilled: 3/30/00 185 20 180 25 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES ?OTECHNICAL BORING L B -2 Date 3 -30 -00 Sheet 1 of I Project Encinitas Ranch/Let 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop -Min. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 205 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map 505ACn /771 LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION a r m to 3 U Cu X00 d av U ao + v — oLL Cu u o a N C car' w� ov L z° E m w .o C _tn Logged By MDJ W a �U rn M (0 Sampled By MDJ 205 0 Bulk I SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) 0 1': Silty SAND with gravel: light brown, moist, medium dense; trace of clay 2 52 0 2.5': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown to gray- brown, moist, dense '_(K) 5 3 58 104.9 14.8 05': Silty fine SAND: gray- brown, damp, dense; scattered organic material 4 91/10' 114.1 15.0 07.5': Silty fine SAND: gray- brown, damp, very dense; iron concretions 19) 10 5 83/11- 114.1 13.3 0 10': Silty fine SAND, orange -brown, damp, very dense Tout Depth = 12 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling Backfilled: 3130100 190 15 185 20 180 25 505ACn /771 LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES -!'OTECHNICAL BORING Lk- B -3 Date 3 -30 -00 Sheet 1 of I Project Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 205 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map 0 D Z � O O I L Ln� n GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION , LA + to oLL tou ' C L)L' aW d av M01 W ov ao z — ma a a N (DJ DI 0 C -= Logged By MDJ Sampled By MDJ 1 u' o U (A 205 0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) ® 0% Silty SAND with gravel: orange - brown, moist, dense (per driller) ® 3.5': Few clay fragments observed in tunings 200 5 1 72 ® 5% Silty fine SAND: orange - brown, damp to moist, dense; trace of clay 2 80 /11" 108.1 15.1 ® 7.5': Silty SAND: orange -brown to gray -brown, moist, very dense 195 10 3 75 110.9 13.7 ® 10': Silty fine SAND: orange -brawn to gray- brown, moist, dense Total Depth = 12 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling Backfilled: 3/30/00 190 15 185 20 180 25 505A(11/m LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES Date 3 -30-00 Project Drilling Co. _ OTECHNICAL BORING LC 8 -4 Sheet 1 of 1 Encinitas Ranch/Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 F &C Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight Elevation Top of Hole +/- 205 ft. Ref. or Datum ng Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Auxerr 140 pounds Drop 30 in. See Geotechnical Map ` O} U WX L "^ GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION _+ N Z N O OLL N^ (d . UU >d Wd NJ O O6 Ny o m Z no 0- Lv O MW Logged By M Sampled By MDJ wv m o c5 o? rn -205 0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) ® 0': Silty fine SAND: light gray, waist, dense (per driller) 1 74 ® 2.5': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown to gray, moist, dense; few clay fragments 200 5 2 81 115.3 13.2 ® 5': Silty fine to medium SAND: light brown to orange- brown, damp to moist, very dense ' 195 10 3 80111' 116.8 13.8 010': Silty fine SAND: light brown, moist, very dense 190 IS 4 76 116.6 10.5 015': Silry fine SAND: red -brown, moist, dense; few wood fragments Total Depth = 17 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling Backfilled: 3/30100 185 20 180 25 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES ,OTECHNICAL BORING U B -5 Date 3 -30-00 Sheet I of 1 Project Encinitas Ranch/Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 206 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES ° w oc' GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION +a +} aw Loo 0-0 a + Z w 3o oLL W� w u �t } C btn UL! ow w1 ov E m to o a a c —� tL z° Logged By MDJ w m LL L0 Nv Sampled By MDJ 0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) ®0': Silty fine to coarse SAND: orange -brown, moist, dense (per driller); 205 scattered fine gravel t 75 ® 2.5': Silty medium to coarse SAND: orange -brown, dense; scatmred fine gravel 5 2 72 ® 5': Silty medium SAND: orangc -brown, moist, dense 200 3 90 117.4 12.3 ® 7.5': Silty fine SAND: light brown to gray -brown, moist, very dense to — 4 68 109.1 14.3 @ 10': Silty fine to medium SAND: mange-brown, moist, dense 195 Total Depth = 12 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling BackFilled: 3130/00 IS 190 20 185 25 ISO- 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES Date 3 -30-00 Project Drilling Co. _ .OTECHNICAL BORING LC B -6 Sheet I of 1 Encinitas Ranch/Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 F &C Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight Elevation Top of Hole +1- 206 ft. Ref. or Datum ng Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr 140 pounds Drop 30 in. See Geotechnical Map 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES T X O� O ° W � GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION t} NW t} aW L m 00 d + Z W O 3 0 OW C4- W0 L +[ to N UV W W� W Ov — 31 d " .o �J z° C- N W n E C .fJl Logged By MDJ Sampled By MDJ W y L O O LI O� N" 0—. SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (At) 205 00': Silly fine to medium SAND: orange -brown, moist, dense (per driller) 5 1 69 112.4 15.7 ® 5': Silty fine SAND: orange- brown, moist, dense 200 10 2 60 113.0 15.4 ®]0': Silty fine SAND: light brown to orange -brown, moist, dense 195 Is — 3 62 114.4 14.3 a,15': Silry SAND: light brown to orange -brown, moist, dense; few gravel 190 Total Depth a 17 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling Backfdled: 3130/00 20 185 25 180 lo 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES .OTECMUCAL BORING LC B -7 Date 3 -30-00 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Encinitas Rtmch/Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drillinp Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +1- 210 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map C r T � " GEOTECBMCAL DESCRIPTION ,COI 0I Z 30 0LL C4- L 7-t- NN UU >O Wd NJ O pa V) 01" 0" CD z ma Tv s° c —� Logged By MDJ Sampled By MW W fn o L) u)n 210 0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (At1 ® 0': Silty fine SAND: gray -brown, damp, dense (per driller) 205 5 1 65 ® 5': Silty medium SAND: red -brown to orange -brown, damp, dense 200 10 2 801 114.1 13.4 ® 10': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown to gray, moist, very dense; dense lithic 10.51 fragment SM TERTIARY TORREY SANDSTONE (TO ® 13': Became more dense (per driller) 195 15 3 1 50/4- 97.9 8.3 ® 15': Silty fine SANDSTONE: light bmwn, damp, moderately dense; moderately indurated 190 20 4 50/3.5- ® 20': Silty fine m medium SANDSTONE: orange -brown, damp, very dense; moderately indurated Total Depth = 21 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling Bacgftlled: 3/30100 185 25 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES JTECHNICAL BORING LC 3-8 Date 3 -30 -00 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 208 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES O.. _ U Z 0 to L "� NN GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION _` _ Z to Qi 3 0 G' �+ ' M0) aQJ 20 + U OLL N U o a N C UU w� ov �� Z e m w .o c _� Logged By MDJ t a EU cn o E Sampled By MDJ - 0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (At) ® 0': Silty SAND: light brown to brown, moist, dense (per driller) 205 5 1 84 Q 7.5': Silty fine SAND: light brown to orange brown, moist, very dense; 200 scattered wood fragments 10 2 86 ® 10': Silty very fine to medium SAND: Orange-brown to bmwn, moist, very dense; few wood fragments, trace of clay 195 15 3 80 112.9 13.7 ® 15': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown, moist, very dense; iron- stained 190 20 4 83/8' - SM TERTIARY TORREY SANDSTONE (TO 20': Silty fine SAND: orange- brown, moist, very dense Total Depth = 22 Feet 185 No ground water encountered at time of drilling Backfilled: 3/30100 25 180 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES OTECHNICAL BORING LG_ B -9 Date 3 -30 -00 Proiect Encinitas Ranch/Lot 45 Sheet I of 1 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 205 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map td 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES D 31 - 1 W. � "� �!n GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ty td L0 W 2 W O 30 C-� N U L tt C roU U N W 0. d 4.0 M-J t z — O _ °� a N m v" 0. tL e v a T o c �� Logged By MDJ Sampled By MDJ w to oL N 205 -0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (AD 0 0': Silty SAND: light brown to brown, moist, dense (per driller); few gravel 200 5 1 73 5': Silty fine SAND: light brown to brown, moist, dense 195 10 2 85/11' 116.5 142 010': Silty fine SAND: light brown, moist, very dense; iron- stained 190 IS 3 73 ®15': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown to red -brown, moist, dense Total Depth = 17 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling Backfdled: 3/30100 185 20 180 170 25 o 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES 'OTECHNICAL BORING L. B -10 Date 3 -30 -00 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Encinitas Ranch/Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +J- 205 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES ° z o N� GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION +� Nd r^ +a M rru Mo N a + W to a° °LL � Ct 0) U V }C MN — UV z E m a Ta to —� �J a o >EU Logged By MDJ Sampled By MDJ W to o N" 205 -0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) ® 0': Silty SAND: orange -brown to light brown, moist, dense (per driller) 200 5 195 10 1 86 ® 10': Silty fine SAND:. orange -brown to light gray -brown, damp to moist, very dense; trace of clay 190 15 2 72 115.6 14.6 C 15': Silty fine SAND with clay: light brown to gray -brown, moist, dense 185 20 3 78111' 119.2 7.9 ®20': Silty fine to medium SAND: gray to red -brown, damp to moist, very dense Total Depth - 22 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling Backflled: 3130100 180 25 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES 4940028 -029 APPENDIX C Laboratory Testing Procedures and Test Results Hydrocollapse: Selected samples were loaded in a consolidometer to selected overburden pressure. The samples were then inundated with water and the percent hydrocollapse was measured and recorded below. A plot of the test data is also included in this Appendix. Sample Location Total Strain, % Hydrocollapse,% B -1 @ 5 Feet 2.0 0.5 @ 1,100 psf B -6 @ 5 Feet 1.3 0.2 @ 1,100 psf Expansion Index Tests: The expansion potential of selected materials was evaluated by the Expansion Index Test, ASTM D4829. Specimens are molded under a given compactive energy to approximately 50 percent saturation. The prepared 1 -inch thick by 4 -inch diameter specimens are loaded to an equivalent 144 psf surcharge and are inundated with tap water until volumetric equilibrium is reached. The results of these tests are presented in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description Compacted Dry Density(pcf) Expansion Index Expansion Potential B -2 @ 1' -3' Yellow brown silty sand 112.7 20 Very Low Maximum Density Tests: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical materials were determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method DI 557. The results of these tests are presented in the table below: C -1 Maximum Dry Optimum Moisture SampleLocation Sample Description Density(pcf) Content( %) B -2, 1'-3' Yellow brown silty sand 127.0 10.0 C -1 4940028 -029 APPENDIX C (continued) Minimum Resistivity and off Tests: Minimum resistivity and pH tests were performed in general accordance with California Test Method 643. The results are presented in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description pH MinimumResistivity(ohms -cm) B2 @ I' -3' Yellow brown silty sand 4.52 2336 Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate contents of selected samples were determined by standard geochemical methods. The test results are presented in the table below: Sample Location Sulfate Content ( %) Potential Degree of Sulfate Attack* B -2 @ P -3' 0.04 Negligible * Based on the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code, Table No. 19 -A -4 Direct Shear Tests: Direct shear tests were performed on selected remolded and /or undisturbed samples which were soaked under a surcharge equal to the applied normal force during testing. After transfer of the sample to the shear box, and reloading the sample, pore pressures set up in the sample due to the transfer were allowed to dissipate prior to application of shearing force. The samples were tested under various normal loads, a motor - driven, stain- controlled,direct- sheartesting apparatus at a strain rate of 0.001 to 0.01 inches per minute. The test results are presented below. C -2 Apparent Sample Location Sample Description Friction Angle (degrees) Cohesion (psf) B -2 @ 1' Yellow brown silty sand 33 100 (remolded to 90 %) C -2 i i i i i VERTICAL STRESS (ksf) Test Method : ASTM D2435 -90 Boring No. B -1 Sample No. 1 Depth (feet) 5.0 Soil Type SM A Before Adding Water After Adding Water Dry Density (pcf) 119.0 Moisture Content ( %): Before 12.6 After 16.1 Type of Sample Undisturbed CONSOLIDATION - PRESSURE CURVE - Project No. 4940028 -029 Project Name Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 TIT Date 4/17100 Figure No. 1 w VERTICAL STRESS (ksf) Test Method: ASTM D2435 -90 Boring No. B -6 Sample No. 1 Depth (feet) 5.0 Soil Type SM Before Adding Water A After Adding Water Dry Density (pcf) 112.4 Moisture Content ( %): Before 15.7 After 19.8 Type of Sample Undisturbed CONSOLIDATION - PRESSURE CURVE - Project No. 4940028 -029 Project Name Encinitas Ranch/Lot 45 Date 4/17/00 Figure No. 2 Leighton and Associate_. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page I ofG LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROUGH GRADING 1.0 General 1.1 Intent These General Earthwork and Grading Specifications arc for the grading and earthwork shown on the approved grading plan(s) and/or indicated in the geotechnical report(s). These Specifications are a part of the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report(s). In case of conflict, the specific recommendations in the geotechnical report shall supersede these more general Specifications. Observations of the earthwork by the project Geotechnical Consultant during the course of grading may result in new or revised recommendations that could supersede these specifications or the recommendations in the geotechnical report(s). 1.2 The Geotechnical Consultant of Record Prior to commencement of work, the owner shall employ the Geotechnical Consultant of Record (Geotechnical Consultant). The Geotechnical Consultants shall be responsible for reviewing the approved geotechnical reports) and accepting the adequacy of the preliminarygeotechnical findings, conclusions, and recommendations prior to the commencementof the grading. Prior to commencement of grading, the Geotechnical Consultant shall review the "work plan" prepared by the Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) and schedule sufficient personnel to perform the appropriate level of observation, mapping, and compaction testing. During the grading and earthwork operations, the Geotechnical Consultant shall observe, map, and document the subsurface exposures to verify the geotechnical design assumptions. If the observed conditions are found to be significantly different than the interpreted assumptions during the design phase, the Geotechnical Consultant shall inform the owner, recommend appropriate changes in design to accommodate the observed conditions, and notify the review agency where required. Subsurface areas to be geotechnicallyobserved, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested include natural ground after it has been cleared for receiving fill but before fill is placed, bottoms of all "remedial removal" areas, all key bottoms, and benches made on sloping ground to receive fill. The Geotechnical Consultant shall observe the moisture -conditioningand processing of the subgrade and fill materials and perform relative compaction testing of fill to determine the attained level of compaction. The Geotechnical Consultant shall provide the test results to the owner and the Contractoron a routine and frequent basis. 3010 MA _ t Leighton and Associalc�, _.c. GENERAL EARTH WORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 2 of G 1.3 The Earthwork Contractor. The Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) shall be qualified, experienced, and knowledgeable in earthwork logistics, preparation and processing of ground to receive fill, moisture - conditioning and processing of fill, and compacting fill. The Contractor shall review and accept the plans, geotechnical report(s), and these Specifications prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for performing the grading in accordance with the plans and specifications. The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant a work plan that indicates the sequence of earthwork grading, the number of "spreads" of work and the estimated quantities of daily earthwork contemplated for the site prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall inform the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant of changes in work schedules and updates to the work plan at least 24 hours in advance of such changes so that appropriate observations and tests can be planned and accomplished. The Contractor shall not assume that the Geotechnical Consultant is aware of all grading operations. The Contractor shall have the sole responsibility to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with the applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, these Specifications, and the recommendations in the approved geotechnical reports) and grading plan(s). If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Consultant, unsatisfactory cond itions, such as unsuitable soil, improper moisture condition, inadequate compaction, insufficient buttress key size, adverse weather, etc., are resulting in a quality of work less than required in these specifications, the Geotechnical Consultant shall reject the work and may recommend to the owner that construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified. 2.0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled 3010 wv4 2.1 Clearing and Grubbing Vegetation, such as brush, grass, roots, and other deleterious material shall be sufficiently removed and properly disposed of in a method acceptable to the owner, governing agencies, and the Geotechnical Consultant. The Geotechnical Consultant shall evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions. Earth fill material shall not contain more than 1 percent of organic materials (by volume). No fill lift shall contain more than 5 percent of organic matter. Nesting of the organic materials shall not be allowed. If potentially hazardous materials are encountered, the Contractor shall stop work in the affected area, and a hazardous material specialist shall be informed immediately for proper evaluation and handling of these materials prior to continuingto work in that area. As presently defined by the State of California, most refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fuel, motor oil, grease, coolant, etc.) have chemical constituents that are considered to be hazardous waste. As such, the indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these Fluids onto the ground may constitute a misdemeanor, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and shall not be allowed. Leighton and Associates,, ac, GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 3 of G 2.2 Processing Existing ground that has been declared satisfactory for support of 611 by the Geotcchnical Consultant shall be scarified to a minimum depth of G inches. Existing ground that is not satisfactory shall be overexcavated as specified in the following section. Scarification shall continue until soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or clods and the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven features that would inhibit unifomt compaction. 2.3 Overexcavation In addition to removals and overexcavations recommended in the approved geotechnical report(s) and the grading plan, soft, loose, dry, saturated, spongy, organic -rich, highly fractured or otherwise unsuitable ground shall be overexcavated to competent ground as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. 2.4 I3enchinp� Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical units), the ground shall be stepped or benched. Please see the Standard Details for a graphic illustration. The lowest bench or key shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide and at least 2 feet deep, into competent material as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant. Other benches shall be excavated a minimum height of 4 feet into competent material or as otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. Fill placed on ground sloping flatter than 5:1 shall also be benched or otherwise overexcavated to provide a flat subgrade for the fill. 2.5 Eva I uat ion/Acceptance of Fill Areas: All areas to receive fill, including removal and processed areas, key bottoms, and benches, shall be observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested prior to being accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant as suitable to receive fill. The Contractor shall obtain a written acceptance from the Geotechnical Consultant prior to fill placement. A licensed surveyor shall provide the survey control for determining elevations of processed areas, keys, and benches. 3.0 Fill Material 3.1 General Material to be used as fill shall be essentially free of organic matter and other deleterious substances evaluated and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement. Soils of poor quality, such as those with unacceptable gradation, high expansion potential, or low strength shall be placed in areas acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultantor mixed with othersoils to achieve satisfactory fill material. 3.2 Oversize: Oversize material defined as rock, or other irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 8 inches, shall not be buried or placed in fill unless. location, materials, and placement methods are specificallyacccpted by the GeotechnicalConsultant. Placement operations shall be such that nesting of oversized material does not occur and such that oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densified fill. Oversize material shall not be placed within 10 vertical feet of finish grade or within 2 feet of future utilitiesor underground construction. 3.3 Import If importing of fill material is required for grading, proposed import material shall meet the requirements of Section 3.1. The potential import source shall be given to the tote ma Leighton and Associates,.... GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 4 of G Geotechnical Consultant at least 48 hours (2 working days) before importing begins so that its suitabiIitycan be determined and appropriate tests performed. 4.0 Fill Placement and Compaction 4.1 Fill Lavers: Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill (per Section 3.0) in near - horizontal layers not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness. The Geotechnical Consultant may accept thicker layers if testing indicates the grading procedures can adequately compact the thicker layers. Each layer shall be spread evenly and mixed thoroughlyto attain relative uniformityof material and moisture throughout. 4.2 Fill Moisture Conditionine Fill soils shall be watered, dried back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Maximum density and optimum soil moisture content tests shall be performed in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM Test Method D1557-91). 4.3 Compaction of Fill: After each layer has been moisturoconditioned, mixed, and evenly spread, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM Test Method D1557-91). Compaction equipment shall be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified level of compaction with uniformity. 4.4 Compaction of Fill Slones In addition to normal compaction procedures specified above, compaction of slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet in fill elevation, or by other methods producing satisfactory results acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant. Upon completion of grading, relative compaction of the fill, out to the slope face, shall be at least 90 percent of maximum density per ASTM Test Method D1557-91. 4.5 Compaction Testing: Field tests for moisture content and relative compaction of the fill soils shall be performed by the Geotechnical Consultant. Location and frequency of tests shall be at the Consultant's discretion based on field conditions encountered. Compaction test locations will not necessarily be selected on a random basis. Test locations shall be selected to verify adequacy of compaction levels in areas that are judged to be prone to inadequate compaction (such as close to slope faces and at the ftll/bedrockbenches). 4.6 Frequency of Compaction Testing Tests shall betaken at intervals not exceeding feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill soils embankment. In addition, as a guideline, at least one test shall be taken on slope faces for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each 10 feet of vertical height of slope. The Contractor shall assure that fill construction is such that the testing schedule can be accomplished by the Geotechnical Consultant. The Contractor shall stop or slow down the earthwork construction if these minimum standards are not met. 3010 1m4 Leighton and Assoaat, GENERAL EARTH WORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 5 of G 4.7 Compaction Test Locations: The Gcotechnical Consultant shall document the approximate - elevation and horizontal coordinates of each test location. The Contractor shall coordinate with the project surveyor to assure that sufficient grade stakes are established so that the Geotechnical Consultant can determine the test locations with sufficient accuracy. At a minimum, two grade stakes within a horizontal distance of 100 feet and vertically less than 5 feet apart from potential test locations shall be provided. 5.0 Subdrain Installation Subdrain systems shall be installed in accordance with the approved geotechnical report(s), the grading plan, and the Standard Details. The Geotechnical Consultant may recommend additional subdrains and/or changes in subdrain extent, location, grade, or material depending on conditions encountered during grading. All subdrains shall be surveyed by a land surveyor /civil engineer for line and grade after installation and prior to burial. Sufficient time should be allowed by the Contractorfor these surveys. 6.0 Excavation Excavations, as well as over- excavation for remedial purposes, shall be evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. Remedial removal depths shown on geotechnical plans are estimates only. The actual extent of removal shall be determined by the Geotechnical Consultant based on the field evaluation of exposed conditions during grading. Where fill-over-cut slopes are to be graded, the cut portion of the slope shall be made, evaluated, and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of materials for construction of the fill portion of the slope, unless otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. 7.0 Trench Backfills 7.1 The Contractor shall follow all OHSA and CaVOSIfA requirements for safety of trench excavations. 7.2 All bedding and backfill of utility trenches shall be done in accordance with the applicable provisions of Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction. Bedding material shall have a Sand Equivalent greater than 30 (SE>30). The bedding shall be placed to I foot over the top of the conduit and densified by jetting. Backfill shall be placed and densified to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum from I foot above the top of the conduit to the surface. 7.3 The jetting of the bedding around the conduits shall be observed by the Gcotechnical Consultant. 7.4 The Geotechnical Consultant shall test the trench backfill for relative compaction. At least one test should be made fore very 300 feet of trench and 2 feet of HII- 3010 1 v4 Leighton and Associates, Inc. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 6 of 6 7.5 Lift thickness of trench backfill shall not exceed those allowed in the. Standard -Specifications of Public Works Construction unless the Contractor can demonstrate to the Geotechnical Consultant that the fill lift can be compacted to the minimum relative compaction by his alternative equipment and method. 1010 iw. 15' MIN. OUTLET PIPES - -_ — 4'(� NON - PERFORATED PIPE, 100' MAX. O.C. HORIZONTALLY, –_ –_ —__ BACKCUT 1: 30' MAX. O.C. VERTICALLY - -_ - OR FLATTER -�2 %– BENCHING -- ---------- _ — KEY 1 • —___ ___– – — DEPTH -- – 2 % = -- T — — — 2% MIN 2' . — _ —' MIN. 15' MIN. �— KEY WIDTH L" POSITIVE SEAL SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT 12' MIN. OVERLAP FROM THE TOP �HO\�G' RING TIED EVERY 6 FEET FILTER FABRIC THE JOI . ° (MIRAFI 140 OR A APPROVED 5% EQUIVALENT) OUTLET PIPE �� o (NON-PERFORATED)_�� T CONNECTION FOR CALTRANS CLASS II COLLECTOR PIPE TO PERMEABLE OR #2 ROCK OUTLET PIPE (3FT.3/FT.) WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION - Subdrain collector pipe shall be Installed with perforations down or, unless otherwise designated by the geotechnical consultant Outlet pipes shall be non- perforated pipe. The subdrain pipe shall have at least 8 perforations uniformly spaced per foot. Perforation shall be 1/: to 1/S' If drilled holes are used. All subdrain pipes shall have a gradient at least 2% towards the outlet. SUBDRAIN PIPE - Subdrain pipe shall be ASTM D2751, SDR 23.5 or ASTM D1527, Schedule 40, or ASTM D3034, SDR 23.5, Schedule 40 Polyvinyl Chloride Plastic (PVC) pipe. • All outlet pipe shall be placed in a trench no wider than twice the subdrain pipe. Pipe shall be in soil of SE >30 jetted or flooded in place except for the outside 5 feet which shall be native soil bacidill. BUTTRESS OR GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING REPLACEMENT FILL SPECIFICATIONS SUBDRAINS STANDARD DETAILS D 4R5 PROJECTED PLANE 1 TO 1 MA)(IMUM FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO APPROVED GROUND NATURAL GROUND BE 2' MIN. — KEY DEPTH • .a PROJECTED PLANE 1 TO 1 MA)DMUM FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO APPROVED GROUND\ 2' MIN. — KEY DEPTH 1:2% MIN.---- LOWEST LOWEST BENCH (KEY) -- COMPACTED -- -- -- --FlLL -- y -- - REMOVE �— — UNSUITABLE — -- 4 TYPK'.AL MATERIAL LBENCH HEIGHT �COYPACTED--- NATURAL - -'l-- GROUND - -- — —'2% MIN.—.- / IF MIN. LOWEST BENCH 2' MIN. KEY DEPTH CUT FACE TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT NATURAL GROUND OVERBUILT AND ^ - -- TRIM BACK f— DESIGN SLOPE - -- REMOVE NSUITABL `G MATERIAL <0MPAC)TZD LOWEST BENCH KEYING AND BENCHING P.C�Cdau 4' TYPICAL H A— BENCH HEIGHT REMOVE NSUITABLE MATERIAL FILL SLOPE FILL- OVER -CUT SLOPE CUT -OVER -FILL SLOPE For Subdrains See Standard Detail C BEN >fM SHALL BE DONE WHEN SLOPES ANGLE IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 5:1 MINIMUM BENCH HEIGHT SHALL BE 4 FEET WNMJM FILL WIDTH SHALL BE 9 FEET GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING r SPECIFICATIONS G STANDARD DETAILS A U REV. All 1I95 FINISH GRADE -------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- --------------------- ---- ----------------- ---------------------------------- ---------- 10'MIN.=-7-:-.COMPACTED SLOPE– ---- ---- ---- -------------------- FACE– – – – – – – – – – – – – – - - – – – – – – I NATURAL GROUND ---------- --------- - — ------------------------------- — ----------- COMPACTED FILL — — --- =— — -------------------- — REMOVE BENCHING UNSUITABLE ---------------- —��— MATERIAL ------------------ ---------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ,X12r' MIN. OVERLAP FROM THE TOP HOG RING TIED EVERY 6 FEET CALTRANS CLASS II PERMEABLE OR #2 ROCK 0 (9FT.3/FT.) WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC (MIRAF1 140 OR APPROVED LL PIPE SHALL EQUIVALENT) BE MINIMUM 6" DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PVC PERFORATED CANYON SUBDRAIN OUTLET DETAIL PIPE. SEE STANDARD DETAIL D PERFORATED PIPE FOR PIPE SPECIFICATION 6'� MIN. DESIGN FINISHED GRADE lo' MIN. BACKFILL FILTER FABRIC I (MIRAFI 140 OR 2% APPROVED EQUIVALENT) 20' MIN. NON -PERFORATED 5- MIN. \#2 ROCK WRAPPED IN FILTER 6.0 MIN. FABRIC OR CALTRANS CLASS 11 PERMEABLE. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING T[f CANYON SUBDRAINS SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS C 4/0 a RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL RETAINING WALL WALL WATERPROOFING PER ARCHITECT'S SPECIFICATIONS FINISH GRADE - -COMPACTED FI WALL FOOTING NOT TO SCALE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL U.S. Standard Sieve Size % Passing 1" 100 3/4" 90 -100 3/8" 40 -100 No. 4 25 -40 No. 8 18 -33 No. 30 5 -15 No. 50 0 -7 No. 200 0 -3 Sand Equivalent >75 SOIL BACKFILL, COMPACTED TO 90 PERCENT RELATIVE COMPACTION* °6' MIN..° _ = =� OVERLAP - -= V MIN. =_ o 9 - -_- FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE �(MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)** 1.112' CLEAN GRAVEL ** 4�(MIN.) DIAMETER PERFORATED_ 'PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR EQUIVALENT) WITH PERFORATIONS ORIENTED DOWN AS DEPICTED MINIMUM 1 PERCENT GRADIENT TO SUITABLE OUTLET II 3' MIN. COMPETENT BEDROCK OR MATERIAL AS EVALUATED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT *BASED ON ASTM D1557 **IF CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL (SEE GRADATION TO LEFT) IS USED IN PLACE OF 3/4'- 1 -1/2' GRAVEL, FILTER FABRIC MAY BE DELETED. CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL SHOULD BE COMPACTED TO 90 PERCENT,-RELATIVE COMPACTION * NOTE:COMPOSITE DRAINAGE PRODUCTS SUCH AS MIRADRAIN OR J —DRAIN MAY BE USED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO GRAVEL OR CLASS 2. INSTALLATION SHOULD BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANC WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. STABILITY FILL / BUTTRESS DETAIL OUTLET PIPES —4' 0 NONPERFORATED PIPE, 100' MAX. O.C. HORIZONTALLY, 30' MAX. O.C. VERTICALLY KEY DEPTH i 2.,= „• % MIN. --- - -__ luElu yll� KEY WIDTH AS NOTED ON GRADING PLANS 15' MIN. 6' MIN. OVERLAF 3/4'- 1 -1/2' CLEAN GRAVEL (3ft3 /ft. MIN.)- 4-0 NON - PERFORATED PIPE. r 1 FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE (MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)* o \, 5% MIN. SEE T— CONNECTION DETAIL MIN. VER 4' 4) PERFORATED PIPE 4' MIN. BEDDING SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAIL BACK CUT 1:1 OR FLATTER NCH -SEE SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAIL LOWEST SUBDRAIN SHOULD BE SITUATED AS LOW AS POSSIBLE TO ALLOW SUITABLE OUTLET PERFORATED 10' MIN. I�.� EACH SIDE PIPE I CAP NON — PERFORATED OUTLET PIPE T- CONNECTION DETAIL * IF CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL IS USED IN PLACE OF 3/4'- 1.1/2' GRAVEL, FILTER FABRIC MAY BE DELETED SPECIFICATIONS FOR CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL U.S. Standard Sieve Size % Passing 1” 100 3/4" 90 -100 3/8" 40 -100 No. 4 25 -40 No. 8 18 -33 No. 30 5 -15 No. 50 0 -7 No. 200 0 -3 Sand Equivalent >75 NOTES: For buttress dimensions, see geotechnlcal report /plans. Actual dimensions of buttress and subdrain may be changed by the geotechnlcal consultant based on field conditions. SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION - Subdrain pipe should be Installed with perforations down as depicted. At locations recommended by the geotechnlcal, consultant, nonperforated pipe should be installed SUBDRAIN TYPE - Subdraln type should be Acrylon trite Butadlene Styrene (A.B.S.), Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) or approved equivalent. Class 125,SDR 32.5 should be used for maximum 1111 depths of 35 feet. Class 200, SDR 21 should be used for maximum fill depths of 100 feet. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects City Of District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering March 3, 2004 Attn: American Motorists Insurance Company C/o Lou Jones & Associates PO Box 41375 7470 N. Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90041 RE: Encinitas Ranch Apartments, LLC Via Cantebria @ Garden View Road Improvement Permit 6538 -I Case 98 -295 MUP/DR/CDP APN 257- 040 -46 Final release of security Permit 6538 -i authorized various improvements, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the project. Therefore, the final release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 3SM 987 715 00, in the amount of $64,805.00, can hereby be released in entirety. The document original is hereby enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, ly� ZCd Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Cc: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Encinitas Ridge Apartments, LLC Debra Geishart File Enc. Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 760- 633 -2600 1 FAX 760 - 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 Too 760-633 -2700 V recycled paper EA _ _. JEERING SERVICES DEPARTMR.. f INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineenng 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR11ntra_Trws.doc/02.11.99 1 of I T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (N 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: z?ln // C DATE: Regarding (Finance Number - DEPOSIT E TP P/MIN R: (Finance Number _) DEPOSI " (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE AP Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blue[ ine /Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TMITPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other 6) Copies to: Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter" ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • ( CD/ CS/ FIRF/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &EfF /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/Trail/Park/Facility) Grading PI r" mittal/Plan Change/As -built Proposed Co edS Appro d F-1 cc " ❑ Blueline/Red -Imed Checkprint Original Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if y. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Requirements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our ApprovalEl For Your... Review ❑ Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ORIGINATOR: (Name)' (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR11ntra_Trws.doc/02.11.99 1 of I INEERING SERVICES DEPAR ENT NTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capilol Improvement Projec District Support Service Field Operatior Subdivision Engineerin Traffic Engineerin Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services C—D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) Field Operations (FO) EJ ATTENTION: T fViq3'- 20O� DATE: C/(r% I13 �U/ G Regarding (Finance Number 65-26 &1--) DEPO r/F TP IN/DR: Z9 (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE / (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: 2t 7— (!51D Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ _ Submittal/Amended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo• ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TNVTPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ CorporatelPattnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter• ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement rc: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees p Drainage Cl ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ t.,ornmentS/AQdrtlonal Space for DOCUment I) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: FILL Additional Notes: (CD /CS/FIRF/SD WD /OM WD/LC W D/G &FIT /CAT V ) Sketch (if needed) / Description: My (arz-s vc s Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sectioru ❑ Structural Calculation ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Road/Dminage/Water /Sewer /TraiVPmk/Facility) Grading Pla�a VPlan Change /As -built Proposed ❑V Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc ' ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soi Repofrt ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations (Mass/Rough/Prelim Note: See other blocks for additional items, if ary. (Erosion ControVPlahting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal R quirement Our Conversation E] Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval 11 For Your... Review er / Use Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: C�.I � �� (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/tntr3 bans. eocIOZ. 11 99 1 of I SB TRANSMITTAL &0 TO: City of Encinitas DATE: SB &O, INC. Engineering Department JOB NO: ATTN: Tamara O'Neill FROM: Daniel J. O'Rourke 6 -14 -01 56122.20 RE: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments - Precise Grading We are transmitting the following via hand delivery. JUN i 5 ❑ For Your Review /Approval ❑ Reviewed as N ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested No. of copies No. of Sheets Description Date 1 8 Original mylars - 6538 -G, Sheets 1 -8 (for Delta Revision Approval) 2 57 Precise Grading, Landscaping and Structural (4'" check) 1 Previous Check Point 1 Revised Structural Calculations COMMENTS: Submitted for final review, please let me know when I can start collecting signatures on the mylars. W,ECEIVED BY: DJO /jgm DATE: LAND PLANNING +CIVIL ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201+Temecula, California +92590 +(909) 693 -3310 +Fax (909) 693 -3320 Date: June 14, 2001 To: Tamara O'Neil Company. City of Encinitas Address: 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 From: Sherry Morrison Project Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Project M: 200015 Subject Two copies of plans 1� JUN 15 2W F X_Your Request X For Your Use _For Necessary Action _For Your Review /Comments _For Approval _For Your Info /Files Tamara, Here are two copies of onsite landscape for Poinsettia Ridge Apartments. If you have any questions, please call. r� ;FS, M1 iil IWT Thu menage a inoerMed br dre use a the irMividuai a entity to "Kh a u addressed and may contain Wormatgn that n pM "ft con-M nM"exempt M1om dhcb urger applka W , M pie maser of thu menage u mt the intended recipient you are hereby notiped that any dinenYr M dublOUWn ttcopyetg of btu comnxwkadl u Wn uy Mph/bdcd. Landscape Architecture - Planning 434 West Cedar Street, Suite 300, San Diego, California 92101 Phone: (619) 235 -5360, Fax: (619) 235 -5369 E VEERING SERVICES DEPART, VT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM capital Improvement projects Dbetct Support serHces Field Operallons Subdvlston Englnee ft Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) p4 Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services L_D) ❑ OfFce of the Director (k 1) '❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ A'F- MNTION: DATE: Regarding (Finance Number DEPOSI TP /MIN/DR: {DEPOS (Finance Number /FEE. /<�A (Finance Number _� DEPOSI EE APN Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Hap ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ interoffice Memo' ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TMCIPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: / Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter` ❑ Deferred Monumertation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: `( CD/ CS /FMVSDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G&EIT /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park p Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ / # 6"0 0 t— " `� Improvement Plain ❑ SubmittaVPlan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections E] Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) additional items, if any. Note: See other blocks for a ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) / Grading Plain Z ub nag As -built Proposed ❑ ( tq re ed ❑ Apkrrov ❑ cc • ❑ Blueline/Red -linen heplTrC t� O ig 1 ❑ Hydraulic Calcu Ions/Map C st Estimate Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade Structur alculations� (Mass/Rough/Preliminary Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. / \ (Erosion ControVPl rri a ' ) As Per... Submittal equirements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Revie "w Us ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ /I ORIGINATOR: C--)y � (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/tntra Trm i doc /02 11 99 1 of I Date: April 6, 2001 To: Tamara O'Neil Company: City of Encinitas, Engineering Services Address: 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 From: Sherry Morrison Project Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Project if: 200015 Subject: Plan check A41• 0 X—Your Request X For Your Use _For Necessary Action For Your Review /Comments _For Approval _For Your Info /Files V Tamara, Attached with this transmittal is the latest set of Poinsettia Ridge Apartments. • I have added pcc to our construction legend and clarified areas that will be in a separate permit. • I have made corrections to some call outs. • I have edited our details to include specific references to details in this package and those in the architectural package. Also the retaining wall finishes are detailed in the landscape sheet, the structural sheets contain the calculations, and the civil plans contain the wall height. If you have any questions, please call. ThanksO 751/La-r'r TNS message b hr0erbed Idr the rae o/"indivb or entity to which am amre and may cmo n WO wn etat n Ww*ged conrMerrdal. and exempt Iron deco m W app(Kbfh! 1 _ W" ma & M nezage m mt I is Cn rm,MM you am hereby mtffwd t ally dm5emirVppn, dmmi n ca copying o/ t cOmmtTKdppn a Stacey p hdAed' Landscape Architecture - Planning 434 West Cedar Street, Suite 300, San Diego, California 921 Of Phone: (619 ) 235 -5360, Fax: (619 ) 235 -5369 S B &0 TO: SB &O, INC. TRANSMITTAL City of Encinitas Engineering Department ATTN: Tamara O'Neill FROM: Daniel J. O'Rourke 4/ RE: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments We are transmitting the following via hand delivered For Your Review /Approval ❑ ❑ For Your Information ❑ 3-&r Oj DATE: 3-'g-01 JOB NO:56122.20 APR U 6 !U#! Reviewed as Noted As Requested No. of Co ies No of Sheets Description Dffie 1 Previous Redlines & B/U Documentation 2 5 Revised Precise Grading Plans - 3r° Check 2 Bond Estimate 2 Precise Grading Hydrology Study 2 Landscaping Plans - 3rtl Check 2 Structural Plans - Retaining Walls �641uS COMMENTS: Third Plan check submittal KECEIVED BY: DATE: LAND PLANNING +CIVIL ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 +Temecula. Cal ifornia +92590+(909) 693- 3310+Fax (909) 693 -3320 GINEERING SERVICES DEPA. 'ENT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Project District Support Service Field Operation Subdivision Engineennc Traffic Engineennc FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) C] Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (N1) K Field Operations (FO) T Community Development - Current Planning ++1 n O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: oq/ -O C.IC W S44fk `7 San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning Community Services — Parks & Beaches DATE: li Regarding (Finance Number � -VLi— DEPOSI EE T�vf/FI / J/A IN�DR: , /r� �J Finance Number DEPOSI E �'{ 1 t�l� t7F (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: i Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Improvement Plan M Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Q+] Grading Plan Check Checkprint / AP 'proved Copy / Original / New or Revised Other Application: Check I (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: ' ( Staff / Consultan t /CD/Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer /Trail/Park/Fac it ity) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description- (Mass/Rough/Pre (Erosion Controls As Per... Our conversation My /your inquiry Our Review Our Inquiry Our Approval 11 For your... Correction ❑ Comment ❑ Signature Information Uses 11 Please return Please call: f necessary Originator: Lditrz Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633 - 2770 /FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -:700 1SG /ARR/1nter Trans doc /03 02 99 - 1 oft E/ , . iNEERING SERVICES DEPART N._ , T INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CiP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services C_D) Office of the Director (h 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ /❑3 ,- ATTENTION: DATE: Regarding (Finance Numbe �JP5 DEPOS EE TP S (Finance Number DEPOSIT 11 Z le (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments /Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/'IPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: , Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ T A ' 'onal Notes: --�t�- -;�S Corporate/Parmership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ CO/YliYlf�/1 IXJl/ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ • ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/IYCATV) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected [J Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blue] ine /Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public /Private) Note: See other block�4or additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/Traii/Park/Facility) Grading Plan [� ubmitt Ian Change /As -built Proposed ❑ Correc Approve cc cc * El Blueline/Red -lined V� Checkprint Original ❑ 1 `� Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Prelimin Note: See other blocks for additional items, if grry. (Erosion Contro anting �rTtgati�on-2j-ZD As Per... Submittal uirements ff Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/ProposaT[T— Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use p Approval ❑ Signature El Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: 17�&�na (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/lntra Trms.doc/02.11.99 1 of I S B &o SB &O, INC. TO: IICLA.69ddiir_" City of Encinitas Community Services Department ATTN: Phil Cotton FROM Daniel J. O'Rourke RE: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments We are transmitting the following via ❑ For Your Review /Approval ❑ ❑ For Your Information ❑ DATE. 3 -1 -01 JOB NO:56122.20 Reviewed as Noted As Requested No. of Copies No of Sheets Description Date 2 5 Precise Grading Plans 2 49 On -Site Landscaping Plans U rd COMMENTS: Submitted for your review and approval. You have already reviewed the Rough Grading and Public Improvement Plans for this project, these plans are for the on -site improvements. Please call if you have any questions. RECEIVED BY: No DATE: LAND PLANNING+CIVIL ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 ♦Temecula, Cal ifornia +92590 +(909) 693- 3310+Fax (909) 693 -3320 ivy Date: March 1, 2001 To: Phil Cotton Company: City of Encinitas, Community Services Address: 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 From: Sherry Morrison Project: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Project #: 200015 Subject: Plan check #4 X Your Request X For Your Use _For Necessary Action _For Your Review /Comments _For Approval _For Your Info /Files Phil, Attached with this transmittal is the latest set of Poinsettia Ridge Apartments. If you have any questions, please call. ThanksO This mezage Is Inter Tor me use of <M IrMrvidual or entity to which a a aedressea and may Contain IC Ormaoon that Is prrvilegN, coMMenbal, arq exempt from disclosure uIW[I applicable klw. If the redder of this meSSMje is Mt me intelMed recipient you are hereby nptltled that ary desemniition. datrlbution or Copying of this Commum,sawn IS smCW prohlblted. Landscape Architecture — Planning 434 West Cedar Street, Suite 300, San Diego, California 92101 Phone: (619( 235 -5360, Fax: (619( 235 -5369 STRANSMITTAL &0 TO: City of Encinitas SB &O, INC. Engineering Department DATE: 3 -1 -01 JOB NO:56122.20 �MARR 2m LEN GINE EgWG SEgyI�LS CITY i?F FNS CI_ N� ITAS ❑ Reviewed as Noted ❑ As Requested No. of Copies ATTN: Tamara O'Neill Description FROM Daniel J. O'Rourke 1 RE: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments We are transmitting the following via ❑ For Your Review /Approval ❑ 2 For Your Information DATE: 3 -1 -01 JOB NO:56122.20 �MARR 2m LEN GINE EgWG SEgyI�LS CITY i?F FNS CI_ N� ITAS ❑ Reviewed as Noted ❑ As Requested No. of Copies No. of Sheets Description Date 1 Precise Grading Plans & Landscaping Plans - Previous Plan Check 2 Revised Precise Grading 2 49 Revised Landscaping Plans 1 Rough Grading - "Redlines" for slip sheeting the Precise Grading into the Rough Grading Set COMMENTS: cc: �2P q LAND PLANNIN + FYY L IV GI E E' DATE: E 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 +Temecula, Califomia +92590 +(909) 693- 3310+Fax (909) 693 -3320 A A 117 Date: March I, 2001 To: Tamara O'Neil Company: City of Encinitas Address: 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 From: Sherry Morrison Project: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Project k: 200015 Subject: Two copies of plans 4CITY MAR 0 1 2001 GINEthi GStFVICES OF ENCINIT.4S X Your Request X For Your Use _For Necessary Action _For Your Review /Comments _For Approval _For Your Info /Files Tamara, Here are the onsite landscape for Poinsettia Ridge Apartments. These copies are to be checked with SB & Us civil engineering grading plans. With each of these copies are watering program, yearly watering schedule, a water management plan and water allowances calculations. If you have any questions, please call. Thanks0 tw?"� Pus message a intended rot Vv use or Ina indviduai or entity m wnkn rc is addressed arr0 may contain rnlormatron Mat rs praabe ea, confpendal, and eaempt tmm diKbsur! ur,aer applkable law. If [ n aoer or na message a not tM inmMed recipient you are M1ereDy aotirM [bat ary das eminatron, disbrbutbn or copying or Mu communication d sbicby pronrbiled Landscape Architecture - Planning 434 West Cedar Street, Suite 300, San Diego, California 92101 Phone: (619) 235 -5360, Fax: (619) 235 -5369 El JEERING SERVICES DEPARTM. INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects Disldcl Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) [✓] Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T O ATTENTION: DATE: 11-1-7, Co W !/_� Regarding (Finance Numbe DEPOS►� TP UP / � - (Finance Number � DEPOSI " (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE A N: Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised me s /Additional pace f r Document: P • (Staff/Consultant/CD /Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): Improvement Plan 6 Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or sed ivate) (Roa ainage /Water /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) Intermediate Description: Grading Plan eel Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original New or evised Plan Change Description: (Mass/Rough/Prelimin ease) (Erosion ontrol/Planttng ton) As Per... Our conversation My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction ComIeCnt ❑ Signature Q Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return Z^J /rti G s Please call: ��7 , if necessary Originator: / 4U4 Copies to: r 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JS&ARRAnter Trans.doe/03.02.99 1 of I E, NEERING SERVICES DEPARTb- f INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Fled Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services ( -D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: ��a %Q �/ e DATE: 2 Regarding (Finance Num DEPOSIT/1jE�' TP R• Z (Finance Number EPOSI (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE Tramsmittcd as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report C] Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name hange Ap li tion ❑ / 5) Other I A �f Ao C04 p� 6) Copies to� J Traverse Calculations a nce Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Corporate/Partnership Pa Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Ad itional 0tes. Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letterer ,rim Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ G `1 Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ r7c D/ D/ MWD/L /G &E/r/ V) ch (I ne escrip[ion: ZND Improvement Plan ubmittaVPlan hange/As -Built Proposed E] Correct Appro g. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined Checkprinto Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate Publi vats) Note: See other block for additional items, if any. o a er /Se I �a ' J /��Pi I 1 Grading Pla Submi Acc4wl uilt Proposed Correc ATov Blueline /Red - lined Checkprint Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Pre Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Con lantim As Per... Submittal Re cements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry or Approval ❑ For Your... Review a Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑] El Information ORIGINATOR: C�Q /C1 A% i ` - / (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Intra Trens.dod02.11.99 I of I SB &0 SB &O, INC. Land Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveying TO: CITY OF ENCINITAS Community Services ATTN: Phil Cotton FROM: Dan O'Rourke TRANSMITTAL RE: POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS - Public Improvement Plans We are transmitting the following via hand delivery. ra 'id For Your Review /Approval ❑ Reviewed as Noted ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested No. of Copies No. of Sheets DATE: 11/03/00 0 1 4 JOB NO: 56122.20 RE: POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS - Public Improvement Plans We are transmitting the following via hand delivery. ra 'id For Your Review /Approval ❑ Reviewed as Noted ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested No. of Copies No. of Sheets Description Date 2 1 11 4 Public Improvement Plans Previous Check Prints COMMENTS: 2nd plan check Submittal. Please call if you have any questions. RECEIVED BY: cc: DJO: km DATE: 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suite 201 ♦ San Diego, CA 92123 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 1201 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone(858)560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 Phone (909) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 SB &0 SB &O, INC. Land Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveying TRANSMITTAL TO: CITY OF ENCINITAS .�jj 4% ATTN: Tamara O'Neill FROM: Dan O'Rourke NOV Q 3 2000 E: 11/03/00 NO: 56122.20 RE: POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS - Public Improvements We are transmitting the following via hand delivery. ,5fii For Your Review /Approval ❑ Reviewed as Noted ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested No of Copies No of Sheets Description Date 2 11 Public Improvement Plans 1 4 Previous Plan Check Set 2 1 Updated Bond Estimate 1 1 Previous Redlined Cost Estimate 2 — Via Cantebria Traffic Study 1 — Encinitas Ranch Apartments LLC - Operating Agreement (Partnership Papers) COMMENTS: 2"' plan check submittal. Also submitted - copies of transmittals to Community Development, Community Services, Fire, LCWD, and SDWD. Please call if you have any questions. RECEIVED BY: CC' DJO:km DATE: 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suite 201 ♦ San Diego, CA 92123 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 120 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone(858)560 -1141 Fax(858)560 -8157 Phone(909)948 -3450 Fax(909)948 -2750 S13 &0 St3 8-,O, INC. Land Planning Civil Engineering Land Strrreri TRANSMITTAL TO: CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Department ATTN: Tamara O'Neil FROM: Dan O'Rourke DATE: 11/03/00 JOB NO: 56122.20 RE: POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS - Public Improvements We are transmitting the following via hand delivery. For Your Review /Approval ❑ Reviewed as Noted ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested No. of Copies No. of Sheets Description Date 6 5 On -Site Precise Grading y o U O �e � Q d _Z Q 2 _ o z COMMENTS: Per our telephone conversation, Im submitting the on -site precise grading for engineering department plan check. Please read the attached memo relating to this subject, dated 11 -2 -00. RECEIVED BY: cc: DJO:km 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suite 201 • San Diego. CA 92123 Phone (85X) 560 -1141 Fax l8581560 -X157 DATE: 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 120 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone (909) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 E NEERING SERVICES DEPARTA. T INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Fnprovement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engneering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ��Co Development Current Planning O Fire-Fire -Fir Prevention ATTENTION: San Dieguito Water District- Engineerine & Planning Community Services — Parks & Beaches DATE: � r Regarding (Finance Number a�ydo - (DEPOSIT/F E TIP U v/ (Finance Number - DEPOS A, �✓ " (Finance Number - DEPOSITIFEE APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Com en ts Additional Sp a for Documen N (Staff Consultmt/CD/Fire /SD WD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): JEG� 51- dfF` Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised (Public/Private) (Road(Drainage/W ater /Sewedfrai l/Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: lan Check Plan Change Description: Checkp ' / A P ove Copy / Original / 19.eeww or Revised ax S (M oughPr mary/Precise) (Er ntin9 & I a tion) os i As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑/ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Uses ❑ QInformation Please return Please call: 3 J if necess Originator: Copies to: r 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG/ARR/Inter_Trnns dod03.02.99 I of 1 L_ dNEERING SERVICES DEPARTit. JT Capital Irnprovement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations, Subdvislon Engineering Traffic Engineering INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Er�- Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (#I) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: IG r"ae- - d N�� DATE: BV ~- �O Regarding (Finance Number ✓ -u EPOS TPj�/f�OV (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE a!/NC /a ;W _" (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittai/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ _ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo• ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ ^eckprint C] Original [] Certificate ❑ Approved TMTPh?es on of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ff Guarantee ❑ Tax Cert icate 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: ,,Copies offWdocuments listed in preliminary title repo ed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: A ess ❑ Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Additi nal Notes: Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ 2 Q Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park Impact Fees ❑ (CD/ /FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &ET /CATV) (if needed) /Description: Drainage ❑ o/�i Assessments ❑ -v4� Agreement re: Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ J* f--- `1r I 3� 4Y off�— Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) y Grading Plan v Submi lan Chan A;- ,u�il�� Proposed ❑ Corec e ❑ cc • [��l��if/% BluelinelRed -lined Chec not Orig' 1 ❑ ,1ytJ Hydraulic Calculations/Map � Cost Estimate F SoihBB� aft [r� Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ ( eliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, 5n. antra Ianting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal uirements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review UV Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature 0 Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/Intre_Trws. dod02. 1 1.99 I of SB &0 SB &O, INC. Land Planning Civil Engineering bind Su)nrring� TRANSMITTAL TO: CITY OF ENCINITAS DATE: 9/20/00 JOB NO: 56122.20 ATTN: Tamara O'Neill FROM: Dan O'Rourke RE: ROUGH GRADING PLAN CHECK - Poinsettia Ridge Apartments We are transmitting the following via hand delivery. ❑ For Your Review /Approval Reviewed as Noted ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested No of Copies No. of Sheets Descri tion Date 1 N/A Preliminary Title Report 1 Back -Up Dues S.D.G.& E Easement 1 Back -Up Dues Deed Restriction 1 Full Set - Design review Application Package o N O = N COMMENTS: Items heeded per your first plan check comments. RECEIVED BY: cc: DJO:km 1615 Keanw Villa Road. Sui(c 201♦ San Diego. CA 42121 Phony ( \;R1 560-1141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 .7_rr:1 9(8)7 Arnwv Home, Stine 120 ♦ Rancho Cticamonca, CA 417111 Phone (4114( 9W8 -1450 1 51x (9119) 948 -2750 S13 &V SB &O, INC. TRANSMITTAL TO: CITY OF ENCINITAS ATTN: Tamara O'Neil FROM: Dan O'Rourke s6b A08 2611, u 1 � 9/1 RE: POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS - Rough Grading Plans We are transmitting the following via hand delivery. Lund ❑ For Your Review /Approval Reviewed as Noted Planning ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested Civil Engineering Land Surve wing No of Copies No of Sheets Description Date 1/4/ Previous Redlines - Rough Grading (C.D. Dept) 1 4 Previous Redlines - Rough Grading P.C. (Eng. Dept) 1 3 Previous Redlines - Wall P.C. (Eng Dept) 2 7 Revised Plans - Grading & Walls 1 N/A From Previous Submittal - Keystone Calc's, Prelim Title Report, Geotech Report, Coastal Permit 1 1 Previous Cost Estimate (Redline) 2 1 Updated Cost Estimate 1 1 Previous Hydrology Study (Redline) 2 N/A Updated Cost Estimate COMMENTS: Please call if you have any questions. RECEIVED cc: DJO:km B DATE: 3615 Kearny Villa Road. Suite 201♦ San Diego. CA 92123 9007 Arrow Route, Suite RO ♦ Rancho Cucamonga. CA `)1730 Phone (859) 560 -1141 Fax (958) 560 -9157 Phone (9119) 948 -3450 Fax (9091948 -2750 t ANEERING SERVICES DEPART . NT by VACA'o -T, INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM /Copitol knprovement Projects Distn 1 Services M� d�ifneeons ubdivislon En�naenng AE e &0�S T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Tra c Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services L_D) ❑ Office of the Director 01) ❑ Field p do s (FO ❑ ATTENTION: f/ "e� DATE: Regarding (Finance Number DEPOSIT TP R' 2 (Finance Number EPOSIT/FEE ! d- " (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE A N: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ _ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Chec print ❑ Original Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/iPM ❑ RSYolution of Approval 0 Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • /.. MWD/LCWD /G &E/1' /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ S c if, eded) /Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ agaw Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ 3�s� Improvement �j an �� u Change/As -Built Corr Proposed ❑V d ❑ Approve Mfg. Specs. ❑aijblic/ Blueline/Red -lined Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate a[e)_7 Note: See other bl s for additional items, if any. nage Water /Sewe rail/Park/Facility) Grading PIS T ubmittaVPl Charms -built Proposed Corre ❑ cc' By eline/Red -lined Ch print ❑ Orig' al ❑ GGG� 7711/�� N /✓ �YS 'V ' VV c7 Hydraulic Calculations/Ma p Cost Estimate ffJ Soil Rep ' 'se Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations items, if oug re =nary �:/ ✓ Note: See other blocks for additional any. ( osion Contr anting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal R emente Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Propos_al Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review ❑ Use ❑. Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ r ORIGINATOR: ' (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARMntra_Tn s.doc102.11.99 1 of I L E C TRANSMITTAL TO: C /r7 06 eg-r"4`11_005 SoS 5. VV�- i,A� -% AvLri..rVE CA.IC-I A5, C,B 4u z4 ATTN: YAnrA�A o �N6AL DATE: S- Z5 - o 0 PROJECT: C- •1cr�.f .eo..ct{ pp�o2rn,�.�rs We are sending you, enclosed, via our messenger U.S. mail courier service your pick —up fax No. of Date No. of Description Copies Sheets Z 4 Z ZS /rtnc4 Gocwwi.e. -$ d So1c$ GE rlE2- i0 AUG) 2 5 2000 D ENGI�r.ERh C17y pF FAG SERVI1 ES These are sent to you: / for your approval ✓ for your review & comment for your use returned after loan to us — as you requested Remarks � /G�A�� 4i.E For Landmark Engineering LEC Job No. LANDMARK ENGINEERING CORPORATION 2605 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH #321 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 (619) 260 -0420 FAY-(619)260-0456 r'GINEERING SERVICES DEPAR. _ .ENT 140L.0 FL—Arl INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM by Improvement Projects ishlct Ssaoort Services 0 T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Tra tc Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services �D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field p do s (FOJ ❑ 'J57 " -eaJ ATTENTION: DATE: Regarding (Finance Number EPOSITJg) TP R (Finance Number EPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE A N: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ _ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo` ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Chec print ❑ Originalo Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ R olution of Approval 0 Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report 0 Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • /OMWD/LCWD /G &Efr /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ S c if eded) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ /KA= Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ F] 7 I �� ChangelAs Improvement ao 4uyp+i -Built Proposed Corre d ❑ Approve Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red-lined Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ] glfv,at�e /Note: Prail� See other bl s for additional items, if any. au age /Water /SewePark Facil iry) Grading Pla T ubmittal/PI Chan s -built Proposed Corre ❑ cc • [. By eline/Bed -lined h print ❑ Orig' al ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Ma Cost Estimate Soil Re ort P P Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ ough/Preli inary se Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( osion Contro ranting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Re emen Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal O Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature [3 Information ❑ / ORIGINATOR: ' (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -26271 TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR1Intra_Trws.doc/02.11.99 I of 1 S13 TRANSMITTAL 0 TO: CITY OF ENCINITAS SB &O, INC. Engineering Department ATTN: FROM: Dan O'Rourke DATE: 8/18/00 JOB NO: 56122.10 RE: POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS - Public Improvement Plans �, We are transmitting transmitting the following via hand delivery. Land ".i For Your Review /Approval ❑ Revie Noted Planning ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested Civil Engineering Land Surveying No of Copies I No of Sheets Description Date 6 4 Public Improvements 2 Cost Estimates 1 $3,900 Plan Check Deposit COMMENTS: To accompany previously submitted rough grading plans (7- 12 -00). Please combine with previous submittal. RECEIVED cc: DJO:km Y: DATE: 3615 Kearny Villa Road. Suile 2014 San Diego. CA 92123 9007 Arro%% Route, Suile 120 ♦ Rancho Cuc:unonga. CA 917311 Phone IX5X1 S60 -1191 Fax ( XSX) 560 -X157 I'hone (909) 948 -3450 Fax 191191 948-2750 JGINEERING SERVICES DEPAj LENT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Prqecls Dislrld SuppW 5ervices Held Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ef Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) Cl T Community Development - Current Planning, O r /l��e // O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: �/ San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning; �J 7 _'7i Community Services– PPar�ksJ& Beaches DATE: - -!/7�� Regarding (Finance Numbed;/ 1746 DEPOSITL �EE TP U 1� Zr (Finance Number - DEPOSIT/FEE A_ (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE A Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Grading Plan ( C Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / ew or evised Other Application: Check I (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: maw o �1 L I., d'yk • ( Staff / Consul Cant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage /W ater/Sewer/Trai VPark/Faci lity) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: ion As Per... Our conversation ❑ My/your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry � Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction �7 p❑ Comment �� L —� s []� Signature (yInformation ❑ F.� Uses ❑ Please return v Please call: —02 1 if necessary Originator: Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633 - 2770 /FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Inter_Trms.doc/03.02 99 1 of I E. JEERING SERVICES DE'PARTA, INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM apitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations — Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development-Current Planning0. O Fire -Fire Prevention �r7 // ATTENTION: ((7i San Die uito Water District -En ineerin & PI in u� Community Services — Parks &Beaches / DATE: 1 4r- Regarding (Finance Numbe/4 -474/ DEPOSIT EE TP U INap (Finance Number ��) DEPOSI E " . " (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE A Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Co ments/A d'tional pace for Document: r it" 4N "XI • (Staff% Consultant /CD(Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch n�eededC): _ze legl /itif/ V (yN lh �(if �Gf�Jf/ Improvement Plan heck Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original New 9 evised ��t/s Q/fD`✓1� yf�'c ivate) (Roa rainage /Water /Sewer ratVPark/Facility) / L�-- Intermediate Description: - ---` t-_j-- 'lT{, Grading Plan _ Plan Change Description: Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original /Oqew or Oevised ( oug eliminary ecise) rosion Con UPlanting tion) ��/ As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry Orr Approval ❑ For your... Correc ion �7 p❑ Comment Signature (yInformation ❑ Uses ❑ �� G ��" S Please return Please call: `�l ifnecessary Originator: Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SGARRAnter_Trans. docJ03 02.99 1 of 1 I E. INEERING SERVICES DEPARTA T Copitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operotions Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development-Current Planning O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: / �Q San Die uito Water District -En ineerin & PI nin !/ 7i _�O Community Services — PPParkkssj& BBeachheess / DATE: Regarding (Finance Number aI74 �/ =) DEPOSIT EE TP U (Finance Number DEPOSI E A— " (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE A Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check ) , (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Comme ditional Space for Doc nt: (Stafr/C sultant/CD/Fire/SD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): _,5 Sir- Improvement Plan '5 heck Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original New o evised P �c irate (Roa rainage/Water /Sewer rail/Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: Grading Plan rho Plan Change Description: � Checkprint /Approved Copy /Original / ew or evised ( ou Mary (IErosion Co ]/Planting ltio �, / As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry Our Approval ❑ For your... Correc ion ❑ Comment Signature �,Q (yInformation ❑ Uses ❑ Please return �14 2 �"r/ s Please call: `� / if necessary Originator: Copies to: J / 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSC /ARR/Inler Trms.doc /03.02 49 I of I E, JA UNG SERVICES DEPART. ilT TMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering OM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) El Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services C—D) ❑ Office of the Director (kl) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ Community Development-Current Plannin 4 11 Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: San Die uito Water District-Enizineering & Planning ff(/ !I 7i _ go 670 Community Services – PParrkksj& Beaches / DATE: Regarding (Finance NumbeZ4!' '6 DEPOSIT EEEE TP U (Finance Number 'r) DEPOS177FEE �- (Finance Number _� DEPOSITIFEE A PIN: 7 Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Comments/Additional Space for Document: • (Staff/ Consultant /CD/Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): �2Q vfrf��/ /n -�fD�� pw�t^s� fsQ To Improvement Plan heck Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original New evised �� c ivate) (Roa rainage/Water /Sewer raiVPark/Facility) Intermediate Description: - Grading Plan Checkprint / Approved Copy /Original / ew or evised Plan Change Description: ( oug eliminary eclse) A rosion Con VPlanting Lion) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry e Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction �7 E] Signature �Q (yInformation ❑ Uses ❑ Please return �� ` W– –' S Please call: `� / if necessary Originator: Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/Inter Trans.dod03.02. 99 1 of I ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Ftelo Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) District Support Services (_D) Office of the Director (# 1) Field Operations (FO) T Community Development- Current Planning ![� O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: / N /Q►1 San Dieguito Water District- Engineering & Planning —� Community Services — Parks & Beaches DATE: Regarding (Finance Numbed (Finance Number (Finance Number Transmitted as following: DEPOSIT EE DEPOSI E DEPOSIT /FEE Final Parcel Map 0 Final Map ❑ Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Other Application: Check (Type) (Check) CommenWAdditional Space for Document: • W W (Staff/Consultant/CD /Fire /SDD /OMWD/LCD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage /W ater/Sewer/Trai VPark/Faci I ity) "I 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/Inter Trans. doc /03.02.99 I of I Intermediate Description: Grading Plan C Plan Change Description: Checkprint /Approved Copy /Original / ew or evised oug liminary ease) rosion Con UPlanting tion) As Per... / Our conversation My /your inquiry Our Review Our Inquiry Our Approval For your... Please return Correc ion Comment Signature �Q (yInformation �� 2 ti1Q�l S Please call: `� l uses El if necessary Originator: Copies to: =0.l 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/Inter Trans. doc /03.02.99 I of I E, ,Ili. JNG SERVICES DEPART& JT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects Districl Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #I) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development- Current Planning ire -Fire Prevention ATT San Die uito Water District -En ineerin & PI in GO ENTION: Community Services — Parks Beaches / DATE: Regarding (Finance Numbelii(a g DEPOSIT EE TP U I �� (Finance Number - _J DEPOSI E A— " (Finance Number - DEPOSIT/FEE A Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Comments/Additional Space for Document: "( Staff/ Consultant/CD/Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LC ) Sketch (if needed): Improvement Plan heck Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original New evised /��f0%✓� ivate) (Roo ainage/Water /Sewer ralVPark/Facility) Intermediate Description: Grading Plan Plan Change Description: Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original ! ew or evised ( oug eliminary ease) rosion Con VPlanting tion) / As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction �Q �C,00mment Signature �QIInformation E] Uses El Please return Q� Please call: / if necessary Originator: Copies to: r / 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633.2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG /ARR/Inler_Trans.doc /03.02.99 1 of I i .'I.v app ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (__D) ❑ Office of the Director (#I) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development - Current Planning {� /A 9-FLe-Fire Prevention ATTENTION: San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning Community Services — Parks & Beaches DATE: Regarding (Finance Numbed (Finance Number (Finance Number Transmitted as following: DEPOSIT EE DEPOSI E DEPOSIT/FEE Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Grading Plan C Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / ;,or evised As Per... For your... Please return Originator: _ Our conversation ❑ Core c ton Gd.I 2 w� T Z4)�F- A Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff /Consultant/CD/Fire /SD)WD /OMWDr Sketch (if needed): 12-D V,4� *� �I � a I� (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/Water/Sewer/Trail/Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: My /your inquiry Our Review E] Our Inquiry ET� Our Approval ❑ Comment []� Signature ❑ Information 0 Uses ❑ S Please call: J if necessary Copies to: / C 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Intcr Trms.doc /03.02.99 1 of I m E INEERING SERVICES DEPARTA T Copltol Improvement Projects " District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) [3 Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) District Support Services (_D) E] Office of the Director ( #1) Field Operations (FO) T Community Development-Current Planning O Fire -Fire Prevention �O ATTENTION: San Die uito Water District -En Ineerin & PI in Community Services— BBeaches i DATE: �P,arlks�& Regarding (Finance Numbeill /71 DEPOSIT EE TP U (Finance Number DEPOS[ E < =' (Finance Number - DEPOSIT /FEE A N: Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map F-1 Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • (Staff/COnsultant/CD /Five /SDWD /OM)WD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): 'c rivate) (Roa rainage/Water /Sewer ralVPark/Facility) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan heck Checkprint /Approved Copy /Original tf New ocAevised ------ --- -- --- - -- - - - -- - - Grading Plan Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original /aqew or evised Plan Change Description: ( oug elimina�r ) �✓ rosion Con tmg ation Zg Bp As Per... Our conversation My /your inquiry Our Review Our nqutry Our Approval For your... Correction Q1 Comment Signature n _�(yinformation Uses El Please return �� 2 W�� S Please call- -* l if necessary Originator: / p Copies to: r � 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633 - 2770 /FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/Inter_Trms.doc/03.02.99 1 of 1 EivGINEERING SERVICES DEPAR ANT �rdp, INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: DATE: Regarding (Finance Number 4!�'"') TP R T _DEPOSIT (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE / Q- (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE A N: Transmitted as following: Comments /Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Chec print ❑ OriginMQ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ R olution of Approval Ll Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report M Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other 4=t ❑ 6) Copies to: Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: ' /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/r /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer C] Park ❑ Impact Fees El S c 1 (if eded) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ ❑ Agreement re: Improvements E] E] ❑ Pvt Rd. Maint. C 0 #7 Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As- Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public /Private) Note: See other blo k s or additional items, if any. (Road/Drainage/Wa ter /Sewer/Traii/Park/Facility) Grading Pis % ubmittaVPl Chang As -built Proposed Corre ❑ cc ' rLl� Blueline/Red -lined � h print ❑ Orig- al ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Ma Cost Estimate Soil Report P p Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ s ough/Prel' inary ise Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( onion Contra anting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Reswd�emente Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your.., Review Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ r r ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/lnua Trans.doUO2.11.99 1 of 1 Lund Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveving TRANSMITTAL TO: CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Department 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA. 92024 -3633 ATTN DATE: 7/12/00 JOB NO: 56122.20 FROM: Dan O'Rourke r� r� O �j� RE: POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENT - Rough Grading O ittal D JUL 1 2 2000 We are transmitting the following via hand delivery. EN(S'Nf FRIr;G SERVICES Ij CIT -i Or ENCINITAS For Your Review /Approval Revie ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested No. of Copies No of Sheets F Description Date 6 4 Rough Grading Plan 2 - Resolution PC 99 -60 - Conditions of Approval 2 - Preliminary Title Report 2 - Cost Estimate 2 - Soils Report 2 - Hydrology Study 1 - $2,200 Plan Check Deposit 1 - Engineering Development Application COMMENTS: First submittal - rough grading plan for Poinsettia Ridge Apartments. Please give me a call if you have any questions. I'll be calling in to check the plan check status / turnaround time next week. 1.7X�7�I�HC371 cc: DJO:km 3615 Keanm villa Road, Suite 2201♦ San Diego. CA 92123 phone(858)560 -1141 Fax (X58) 560 -8157 DATE: 90117 Arrow Route, Suite 120 ♦ Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 Phone (909) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 SBApril 17, 200] Job No. 56123.00 OR 2 3 ft W O CITY OF ENCINITAS �Tt qpF CI-174S SB &O, INC. Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 RE: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Engineer's Pad Certification for Grading Permit No. 6538 -G Pursuant to Section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for a future garage. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading for the future garage has been Land completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Planning Encinitas, Codes and Standards. 23.24.3 10 (B). The following list provides the pad elevation as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Pad Elevation per Plan As -built Pad Elevation 204.3 204.34 Please contact me if you have any questions. ��?µWFE SS CIVIL Sincerely, �Q y o. 9 Engineering � RAG SB&O INC o x No. 47677 m * Exp. 12 - 31 -03 Daniel J. O'R ke, PE 9r CtW_ per` Vice- President FOF CAOFo Land Surveving DJO:ama cc: Jack Robson/Comerstone Communities D:\57I42 %1bsTAn- CERr -2. wpd Corporate Ottice: 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suite 2011 San Diego, CA 92123 ♦ Phone (858) 560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 120 ♦ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ♦ Phone (909) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 ♦ Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909) 693 -3320 03/19/01 13:06 $858 560 8157 SB &0 S--B April l7, 2001 Olob No. 56123.00 CITY OF ENCINITAS SB &O, INC. Engineering Services Permits - 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 RE: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Engineer's Pad Certification for Grading Permit No. 6538 -G 2002/002 Pursuant to Section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for a future garage. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading for the future garage has been Land completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Planning Encinitas, Codes and Standards- 23-24.370(B). The following list provides the pad elevation as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Pad Elevation M Plan As -built Pad Elevation 204.3 204.34 Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, pROFE 9 Civil Engineering SB &O, INC N0.47677 * Er<p, 12 - 31 -� s Daniel J. O'R ke, PE CtvtL Vice - President Fo CA, %V:0 Land Surveying D • __na cc: Jack Robson/Cornerstone Communities 0:157 t 42HVS\PAD.CERtd.wyd Corporate Mice; 3615 Keurny Villa Roo& Suite 2014 San Diego, CA 92123 ♦ Phone (858) 560.1141 Fax (858) 560 -b157 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 120 ♦ Rancho Cucamonga- CA 91730 4 Phone (909) 948.3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue. Suite 201 ♦ Temecula, CA 92$90 * Phone (909) 693.3310 Fax (9O')) 693 -3320 Leighton and Associates A GTG Company GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT MEMORANDUM To: Cornerstone Communities Date: January 5, 2001 4365 Executive Drive, Suite 600 San Diego, California92121 Project No. 940028 -032 Attention: Jack Robson From: Kevin B. Colson Subject: Recommendations for Mitigation of Ground Water Seepage Condition, Retaining Wall Backcut, Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Lot 45 of Encinitas Town Center, Encinitas, California Based on field observation and geotechnical mapping during rough grading operations for the Poinsettia Ridge Apartments development, ground water seepage was encountered in a portion of the east- facing retaining wall backcut on the western side of the site. The seepage observed has occurred along a geologic contact between colluvial soils and artificial fill placed during the mass grading of the Encinitas Town Center development. The source of the water is most likely from rainwater and/or irrigation water accumulation (in the natural valley above the site) which has migrated along this contact and traveled down slope to the site. In order to mitigate the ground water seepage condition, we recommend vertical drainage panels (J -Drain Drainage Panel 102 or equivalent) be placed across the seepage area along the backcut in the area of observed seepage. We recommend placement of one of the drainage panels at an angle along the actual geologic contact where the seepage has occurred and supplemental panels on either side of the seepage area to provide sufficient coverage of the susceptible area. Actual drainage panel locations and lengths should be determined in the field during the grading operations, however, we anticipate approximately 100 linear feet of panel will be necessary for mitigation of the ground water seepage condition encountered. Prior to placement of the panels, saturated, loose, and /or disturbed soil should be removed and replaced with properly compacted and moisture conditioned fill soils. The removed soils may be reused as fill provided they are dried back to a workable moisture content. A subdrain system should be constructed at the base of the backcut to collect the water from the panel drain system. The vertical drainage panels should be overlapped across the top of the subdrain. The subdrain system should consist of a 4 -inch perforated pipe surrounded by a minimum of 3 cubic feet (per linear foot) of crushed rock and wrapped in filter fabric (Mirafi 140N or equivalent). The subdrain system should then be tied via solid pipe to the proposed subdrain system for the proposed keystone wall. 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, #8205, San Dlego, CA 92123 -4425 (858) 292 -8030 • FAX (858) 292 -0771 • www.leighlongeo.com 940028 -032 If you have any questions regarding this letter please contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Distribution: (4) Addressee 2- Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. / <� '5 Z�/-' Kevin B. Colson, R67119 Senior Staff Geologist / Project Manager Randall K. Wagner, C r1612 Director of Geology AIM -� HOROWITZ TAYLOR ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL L CIVIL COr1SULTI hO STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PROJECT: Po 1 tJ S I a 1 TA .4 1049 .9-0 11h a l N r t.-J A US JUN 15 2001 DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS: r CONCRETE STRENGTH AT TWENTY EIGHT DAYS: 2 50�0 PSI MASONRY: MORTAR: GRADE "N" CONCRETE BLOCK F' M = ( 5 PS TYPE S 1800 PSI GROUT: 2000 PSI REINFORCING STEEL: A -615 STRUCTURAL STEEL: A -36 LUMBER: DOUGLAS FIR —LARCH JOISTS BEAMS AND POSTS STUDS SEISMIC FORCE: WIND FORCE: DESIGN LOADS: ROOF DEAD LOAD SLOPING ITT ROOFING PLYWOOD JOISTS INSUL. & CLG. MISC. TOTAL = ROOF LIVE LOAD SLOPING FLAT GRADE 40: #5 AND LESS (U.O.N.) GRADE 60: #6 AND LARGER #2 #2 STUD OR BETTER REPORT BY: QLe liq.HToN �l AsSOGIQ9-e$ REPORT NO.: y / qao 2 S— d 2-j SOIL PRESSURE: ? FLOOR DEAD LOAD WALL DEAD LOAD INT. EXT. FLOORING INTERIOR 10 PSF PLYWOOD EXTERIOR 16 PSF JOISTS INSUL. & CLG MISC. TOTAL = FLOOR LIVE LOAD INTERIOR 40 PSF BALCONY 60 PSF (U.O.N.) EXIT WALKWAY 100 PSF These calculations are limited only to the items included herein, selected by the client and do not imply approval of any other portion of the structure by this office. These calculations are not valid if altered in any way, or not accompanied by a wet stamp and signature of the Fnoinerr of Record. =Job Designed - Date ;f No iBy_ , 3914 Murphy Canyon Rd. • Suite A100 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-4383 • FAX (619) 560-8842 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each page. Pev: 510300 eW 0601355 Ver 51 3, 22 Jul L999 W1+32 (cl 1993- 99 ENEP LC Descriotlon 4ft 2:1 Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope: Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Criteria = 2,000.0 psf Retained Height = 4.00 ft Wall height above soil = 0.00 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem' = 0.0 psf Design Summary Total Bearing Load = 1,377 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 6.50 in Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 55.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 It FoolinglISoil Frictiot = 0.330 Soil height to ignore 12.00 in for passive pressure = 6.00 in Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,296 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 1,658 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 9.6 psi OK Fooling Shear @ Heel = 8.7 psi OK Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios Overturning = 1.85 OK Sliding = 1.97 OK Sliding Cates (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 687.5 lbs less 100% Passive Force= - 900.0 lbs less 100% Friction Force= - 454.3 lbs Added Force Req'd = o.o lbs OK ....for 1.5: 1 Stability = 0.0 lbs OK Footing Design Results Toe Heel Factored Pressure = 1,658 0 ps Mu': Upward = 922 0 ft Mu' : Downward = 195 580 ft Mu: Design = 727 580 ft Actual 1 -Way Shear = 9.62 8.71 ps Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 ps Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Job # Date: 4:59PM, 5 APR 01 Page 1 Footing Strengths & Dimensions fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 1.00 ft Heel Width = 1.50 . Total Fooing Wi& = 5�. Fooling Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in Key Depth = 12.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.50 It Total Force @ Section Ibs= 4 440.0 Moment.... Actual ft-#= 5 586.7 Moment..... Allowable = 9 916.4 Shear..... Actual psi = 7 7.7 Shear.....Allowable psi = 1 19.4 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in= 3 30.00 Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Ht. in 6 6.00 Wall Weight = 7 78.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in = 5 5.25 Masonry Data Fm psi = 1 1,500 Fs psi = 2 24,000 Solid Grouting = Y Yes Special Inspection = N No Modular Ration' = 2 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1 1.000 f Equiv. Solid Thick, in= 7 7.60 Job # Date: 4:59PM, 5 APR 01 Page 1 Footing Strengths & Dimensions fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 1.00 ft Heel Width = 1.50 . Total Fooing Wi& = 5�. Fooling Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in Key Depth = 12.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.50 It Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in Stem Construction Top Stem Stem OK Design height ft= 0 0.00 Wall Material Above'HP = M Masonry Thickness = 8 8.00 Rebar Size = # # 51 Rebar Spacing = 2 24.00 Rebar Placed at = E Edge Design Data fb /FB + fa /Fa = 0 0.640 Total Force @ Section Ibs= 4 440.0 Moment.... Actual ft-#= 5 586.7 Moment..... Allowable = 9 916.4 Shear..... Actual psi = 7 7.7 Shear.....Allowable psi = 1 19.4 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in= 3 30.00 Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Ht. in 6 6.00 Wall Weight = 7 78.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in = 5 5.25 Masonry Data Fm psi = 1 1,500 Fs psi = 2 24,000 Solid Grouting = Y Yes Special Inspection = N No Modular Ration' = 2 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1 1.000 f Equiv. Solid Thick, in= 7 7.60 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each page. Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope : Job # Date: 4:59PPI, 5APR01 ws srowo Page 2 1r,I -�01 ; 51322JUr1999 Wn33 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design 4ft 2:1 summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs ft ft -# Ibs It ft-# Heel Active Pressure = Toe Active Pressure = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = Seismict-oad = 687.5 1.67 1,145.8 0.50 Total = 687.5 O.T.M. = 1,145.8 ResistinglOverturning Ratio 1.85 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,376.6 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Soil Over Heel = 366.7 2.08 763.9 Sloped Soil Over Heel _ Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = 0.00 Soil Over Toe = 55.0 0.50 27.5 Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 312.0 1.33 416.0 Earth @ Stem Transitions= Fooling Weight = 375.0 1.25 468.7 Key Weight = 150.0 1.00 150.0 Vert. Component _ 118.0 2.50 294.9 Total= 1.376.6 Ibs R.M.= 2,121.1 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each S., : 510300 Uu, M 0601355. Vo 5.1.3. 22Jun.I". w,n32 (0196399 ENEF LC Description Eft 2:1 Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope: Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Criteria = 2,000.0 psf Retained Height = 6.00 ft Wall height above soil 0.00 ft Slope Behind Wall 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem- = 0.0 psf Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 55.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 It FootingIlSoil Frictiol = 0.330 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 6.00 in Job # Date: 4:59PM, 5 APR 01 Page 1 Footing Strengths 8 Dimensions Pc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 1.00 It Heel Width = 2.50 Total Footing Widtr =50- = 2,714 lbs Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in - Key Depth = 16.00 in �.- Key Distance from Toe = 0.75 ft Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in Design Summary Stem Construc I Top Stem 2nd Stem OK Stem OK Total Bearing Load = 2,714 lbs Design height ft= 2.67 0.00 ...resultant eoc. = 9.28 in Wall Material Above "HC = Masonry Masonry Thickness 8.00 12.00 Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,853 psf OK p Reber Size = # 5 # 5 Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Rebar Spacing = 24.00 24.00 Allowable = 2,000 psf Rebar Placed at = Edge Edge Soil Pressure Less Than Alowable Design Data ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,256 psf fb /FB + fa/Fa = 0.369 0.903 ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Total Force @ Section Ibs = 304.9 990.0 Footing Shear @ Toe = 15.5 psi OK Moment.... Actual ft-#= 338.5 1,980.0 Footing Shear @ Heel = 20.5 psi OK Moment..... Allowable ft-#= 916.4 2,192.4 Allowable = 85.0 psi Shear..... Actual psi= 5.3 9.9 Wall Stability Ratios Shear..... Allowable psi = 19.4 19.4 Overturning = 1.84 OK Sliding = 1.53 OK Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in = 30.00 30.00 Sliding Cates (Vertical Component Used) Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Ht. in = 30.00 8.09 Lateral Sliding Force = 1,347.5 lbs Wall Weight psf = 78.0 124.0 less 100% Passive Force= - 1,166.7 lbs Rebar Depth 'd' in = 5.25 9.00 less 100% Friction Force= - 895 +7 lbs Masonry Data psi = 1,500 1,500 Added Force Req'd = 0.0 lbs OK Fs psi = 24,000 24,000 ....for 1.5: 1 Stability = 0.0 lbs OK Solid Grouting = Yes Yes- R9UIts FOOtin Design 3 Special Inspection = No No- Modular Ration' = 25.78 25.78 TOO Heel Short Term Factor = 1.000 1.000 Factored Pressure = 2,256 0 psf Equiv. Solid Thick. In= 7.60 11.62 Mu': Upward = 1.512 0 ft-# Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Mu': Downward = 224 2,326 ft-# Concrete Data Mu: Design = 1,288 2,326 ft-# rc psi = Actual 1 -Way Shear = 15.53 20.53 psi Fy psi = Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Other acceptable Sizes a Spacings Toe Reinforcing = None Speed Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S ' Fr Heel Reinforcing = None Speed Heel: #4@ 19.75 in, #5@ 30.50 in, #6@ 43.25 in, #7@ 48 +25 In, #8@ 48.25 in, #9@ 4 Key Reinforcing = None Speed Key: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr To specify your title block on Title : Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Dale: 4:59PM, 5APR01 Descdptlon selection on the main menu and enter your title block Information Scope: will be printed on each page. u . slooweo --- v..s�a. aa- ��sse. w��3a Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 2 .. Design_,., Al A \ n1 .41 Anew ra I, idahnnz Description Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments ...- OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs ft ft-# Ibs ft ft41 Heel Active Pressure = 1,347.5 2.33 3,144.2 Soil Over Heel = 990.0 2.75 2,722.5 Toe Active Pressure = 0.50 Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = Seismicload = Total = 1,347.5 O.T.M. = 3,144.2 Resisting/Overturning Ratio = 1.84 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 2,714.1 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Surcharge Over Heel Adjacent Footing Load Axial Dead Load on Stem = 0.00 Soil Over Toe = 55.0 0.50 27.5 Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight s) = 990.8 1.43 842.9 Earth @ Stem Transitions 1.83 223.9 Footing Weight = 525.0 1.75 918.7 Key Weight = 200.0 1.25 250.0 Vert. Component _ 431,2 3.50 809.3 Total = 2,714.1 Ibs R.M.= 5,794.8 To specify your title block on Title: Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dii Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 selection on the main menu and Description enter your title block information Scope will be printed on each page. J "' M 1355 Y1513.22Jum1999.wn32 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page W 's (C) 198399 ENE LC c'\ \ .ecw: tcation Description 4ft level Criteria = 2,000.0 psf Retained Height = 4.00 ft Wall height above soil = 0.00 It Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density Wind on Stem = 110.00 Pcf Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 ft FootingljSoll Fricior 0.0 psf Soil height to ignore for passive pressure Design Summary Total Bearing Load = '1,359 Ibs _.resultant ecc. = 3.06 In (3119191: = 6.00 in Stem Construction = 876 psi OK Design height ft= Wall Material Above "Ht" _ Thickness = Rebar Size = Rebar Spacing = Rebar Placed at = Design Data Allowable fb /FB +fa/Fa = Total Force @ Section Ibs = Moment.... Actual ft-#= Moment..... Allowable = Shear..... Actual psi = Shear..... Allowable psi = Soil Pressure @ Toe = 876 psi OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 211 psf OK Allowable = 2.000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 1,116 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 269 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 4.7 psi OK Fooling Shear @ Heel = 11.5 psi OK Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios 0.00 It Overturning = 2.85 OK Sliding = 1.71 OK Sliding Cales (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Face = 437.5 Ibs less 100% Passive Force= - 300.0 Ibs less 100% Friction Force= - 448.4 Ibs Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ibs OK ....fa 1.5 :1 Stability = 0.0 Ibs OK Footing Design Results fc Toe _Heel Factored Pressure = 1,116 269 psi Mu' : Upward = 355 0 ft-# Mu': Downward = 100 0 ft-# Mu: Design = 255 635 ft -# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 4.68 11.48 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spedd Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Footing Strengths & Dimensions fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 0.67 it Heel Width = 1.83 Total Footing Widtr =SiS psi= Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 0.00 in Key Depth = 0.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.00 It Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in Sp tem Stem OK 0.00 Masonry 8.00 # 5 24.00 Edge 0.407 280.0 373.3 916.4 4.9 19.4 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in = 30.00 Bar lap/Hook BELOW Ht. in = 6.00 Wall Weight = 78.0 Reber Depth 'd' in= 5.25 Masonry Data fm psi= 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Special Inspection = No Modular Ration' = 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.000 Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 7.60 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi = Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Key: No key defined To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each page. Title: Dsgnr: Description Scope : Job 0 Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 5 Ils9,V�•s�i.22J.n1999 .w,132 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 2' xw Talcu Ufmn< n 4ft level Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments ...- OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs If ft-# Ibs ft ft -# Heel Active Pressure = Toe Active Pressure = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SeismicLoad = 437.5 1.67 7292 0.50 Total = 437.5 O.T.M. 729.2 ResistinglOverturning Ratio = 2.85 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,358.9 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Soil Over Heel = 513.3 1.92 983.9 Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem= 0.00 Soil Over Toe = 36.7 0.33 12.2 Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 312.0 1.00 312.0 Earth @ Stem Transitions= Footing Weighl = 375.0 1.25 468.7 Key Weight = Vert. Component = 121.9 2.50 304.8 Total = 1,358.9 Ibs R.M.= 2,081.7 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope: Job # Date: 6:31PM, 31 MAR 01 will be printed on each page. A.: SLO o Page 1 1355, W, w - Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design .. .. �e %nl arR, wrirleannn� Description 5.33ft level Criteria 1,019 psf OK Retained Height = 5.33 It Wall height above soil = 0.00 it Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem' = 0.0 psf Design summary Total Bearing Load = '2,443 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 3.21 In Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,019 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 378 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 1,312 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 486 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 6.2 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 25.2 psi OK Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios 0.00 ft Overturning = 3.45 OK Sliding = 1.58 OK Sliding Cates (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 701.2 Ibs less 100% Passive Forces - 300.0 Ibs less 100% Friction Force= - 806.2 Ibs Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 It FootingllSoil Frictioi = 0.330 Soil height to Ignore for passive pressure = 6.00 in Footing Strengths &Dimensions fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 0.67 It Heel Width = 2.83 Total Footing Widtt = X521 Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in Key Depth = 0.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.00 ft Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in Stem Construction Top Stem Design height ft= Stem OK 0.00 Wall Material Above "Ht" = Masonry Thickness = 8.00 Reber Size = # 5 Rebar Spacing = 24.00 Rebar Placed at = Edge Design Data 1,502 ft-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = lb/FB + fa/Fa = 0.964 Total Force @ Section Ibs = 497.2 Moment.... Actual ft-#= 883.3 Moment ..... Allowable = 916.4 Shear..... Actual psi = 8.7 Shear..... Allowable psi = 19.4 Added Force Rep'd = 0.0 Ibs OK ....for 1.5: 1 Stability = 0.0 Ibs OK Footing Design Results Masonry Data _Toe Heel Factored Pressure = 1,312 486 psf Mu': Upward = 433 0 ft-# Mu' : Downward = 100 0 ft-# Mu: Design = 333 1,502 ft-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 618 25.15 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Heel Reinforcing = None Spec d Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in = 30.00 Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht. in= 6.33 Wall Weight = 78.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in = 5.25 Masonry Data fm psi= 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Special Inspection = No Modular Ration' = 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.000 Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 7.60 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi= Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes 3 Spacings Toe: Not req'd. Mu < S ` Fr Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Key: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each page. rte. 51Qx Uxr M 060135.5 ve, 51 3. 22 Jun 1999. wm ?: (c)1983"ENE C Description 5.33ft level Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope : Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Job # Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 Page 2 Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments ...- OVERTURNING..... ... -RESISTING ..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs It ft-# Ibs ft ft-# Heel Active Pressure = Toe Active Pressure = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SetsmicLOad = 701.2 2.11 1,479.5 0.50 Total = 7012 O.T.M. = 1,479.5 Resisting /Overturning Ratio = 3.45 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 2,443.1 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Sail Over Heel = 1,270.3 2.42 3,069.9 Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem= 0.00 Soil Over Toe = 36.7 0.33 12.2 Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 415.7 1,00 415.7 Earth @ Stem Transitions= Footing Weight - 525.0 1.75 918.7 Key Weight = 0.50 Vert. Component - 195.4 150 684.0 Total= 2,443.1 Ibs R.M.= 5,100.6 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each page. A. W2100 US.,: KW 0601355. V.r 51 3. 22 )V,, 1999. W,n32 Description 7.33ft level Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope: Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Criteria 1,847 psf Retained Height = 7.33 ft Wall height above soil = 0.00 It Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem' = 0.0 psf Design Summary Total Bearing Load = 3,143 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 7.38 In Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,847 psf Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,166 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @ Too = 15.3 psi Footing Shear @ Heel = 25.3 psi Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios Ibs = Overturning = 2.06 OK Sliding = 1.60 OK Sliding Cates (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 1,214.3 Ibs less 100% Passive Force= - 900.0 Ibs less 100% Friction Force= - 1,037.3 Ibs F N O. a 1 Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ibs OK ....for 1.5: 1 Stability = 0.0 Ibs OK Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 ft FootingllSoil Frictiol = 0.330 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 6.00 in Stem Construction ' Design height it Wall Material Above 'Hl" _ Thickness = Rebar Size = Rebar Spacing = Rebar Placed at = Design Data = 1,261 fb1FB + fa/Fa = Total Force @ Section Ibs = Moment.... Actual ft-#= Moment.... Allowable ft-#= Shear..... Actual psi = Shear..... Allowable psi = Footing Desi n Results fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi TOO Heel Factored Pressure = 2,166 0 psf Mu': Upward = 1,485 0 ft-# Mu': Downward = 224 2,913 ft-# Mu: Design = 1,261 2,913 ft-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 15.31 25.33 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spedd = Heel Reinforcing = None Spedd in = Key Reinforcing = None Spedd Concrete Data Job # Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 Page 1 Footing Strengths &Dimensions fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 1.00 ft Heel Width = 2.50 Total Footing Widt? psi= Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in Key Depth = 12.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.75 It Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in I 2nd Modular Ratio'n' Stem OK Stem OK 2.67 0.00 Masonry Masonry 8.00 12.00 # 5 # 5 24.00 16.00 Edge Edge 0.644 380.0 590.3 916.4 6.7 19.4 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in = 30.00 Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht. in = 30.00 Wall Weight psf= 78.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in = 5.25 Masonry Data I'm psi= 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Special Inspection = No Modular Ratio'n' = 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.000 Equiv, Solid Thick, in = 7.60 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi= Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S - Fr Heel: #4@ 19.75 In, #5@ 30.50 in Key: Not req'd, Mu < S " Fr 0.896 940.3 2,297.4 2,563.0 9.6 19.4 30.00 6.36 124.0 9.00 1,500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.000 11.62 #6@ 43.25 In, #7@ 48.25 in, #8@ 48.25 in, #9@ 4 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each page. R.: 510300 — User . M %01355. Ve, 5 1 3. 2Z Jun 1999. w,n32 Description 7.33ft level Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope: Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Job # Date: 6:31PM, 31 MAR 01 Page 2 Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs ft ft-# Ibs it ft-# Heel Active Pressure = 1,214.3 2.78 3,371.7 Toe Active Pressure = 0.50 Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footinp Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SeismicLoad = Total = 1,214.3 O.T.M. = 3,371.7 Resisting /Overturning Ratio = 2.06 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 3,143.3 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Soil Over Heel = 1,209.5 2.75 3,326.0 Sloped Soil Over Hee'. _ Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem= 0.00 Soil Over Toe = 55.0 0.50 27.5 Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weights) = 694.6 1.41 981.3 Earth @ Stem Transitions = 170.9 1.83 313.3 Footing Weight = 525.0 1.75 918.7 Key Weight = 150.0 1.25 187.5 Vert. Component - 338.4 3.50 1,184.5 Total= 3,143.3 Ibs R.M. - 6,938.8 To specify your title block on Title: these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr' Description . selection on the main menu and 0.00 ft enter your title block Information Scope: will be Drinted on each papa. 6.00 in Job # Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 1 11 ur,.,. 35a;• -s =3 =, ="9 W 3 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 1' Description 9.33ft level Criteria 1,954 psf OK Retained Height = 9.33 it Wall height above soil = 0.00 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Sal Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem' = 0.0 psf Design Summary Total Bearing Load = 3,971 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 9.24 in Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,954 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psi OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,108 psi ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 25.5 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 23.5 psi OK Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 it FootingilSal Fdcdol = 0.330 Soil height to Ignore for passive pressure = 6.00 in Footing Strengths & Dimensions rc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width Heel Width Total Footing Width Footing Thickness Key Width Key Depth Key Distance from Toe Cover @ Top = 3.00 In 2.00 it = 2.25 12.00 in = 12.00 in 24.00 in 1.75 it @ Btm.= 3.00 in Stem Construction Top Stem 2nd Design height Stem OK ft= 4.00 Stem OK 0.00 Wall Material Above "HI" = Masonry Masonry Thickness = 8.00 16.00 Reber Size = # 5 # 6 Reber Spacing = 24.00 16.00 Reber Placed at = Edge Edge Design Data 2,108 0 psf Mu': Upward = fb/FB * fa /Fa = 0.964 0.992 Total Force @ Section Ibs = 497.2 1,523.4 Moment.... Actual ft-#= 883.3 4,737.6 Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios Reber Depth 'd' Overturning = 1.84 OK Sliding = 1.67 OK Sliding Calks (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 1,867.4 lbs less 100% Passive Force= - 1,800.0 lbs less 100% Friction Force= - 1,310.5 lbs Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ibs OK ....for 1.5 : 1 Stability = 0.0 lbs OK Footing Design Results = Too Heel Factored Pressure = 2,108 0 psf Mu': Upward = 4,640 0 ftat Mu': Downward = 781 2,098 it-# Mu: Design = 3,859 2,098 it-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 25.54 23.47 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd Key Reinforcing = None Specd Moment..... Allowable it-#= 916.4 Shear..... Actual psi = 8.7 Shear ..... Allowable psi= 19.4 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. In = 30.00 Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht. In = 30.00 Wall Weight psi= 78.0 Reber Depth 'd' In = 5.25 Masonry Data fm psi= 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Special Inspection = No Modular Ratio'n' = 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.000 Equiv. Solid Thick. In = 7.60 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi= Fy psi = 5,312.4 10.7 19.4 36.00 7.67 164.0 13.00 1,500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.000 15.62 Other Acceptable Sizes 3 Spacings Toe: #4@ 17.75 in. #5@ 27.50 in, #6@ 39.00 in, #7@ 48.25 In, #8@ 48.25 in, #9@ 4 Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Key: #4@ 18.75 in, #5@ 28.75 in, #6@ 40. To specify your title block on Title : Job # Descri Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 these five lines, use the SETTINGS Description selection on the main menu and enter your title block information Scope will be printed on each page. W Per. 510300 s ew01355 Vey 51 3 99 Un 19 p2 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 2 R.ffi. J. tot %399EW+ LC c:\ec \01.318.ecw.Caicwaeons 9.33ft level Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments ...- OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs It ft -# Ibs It ft-# Heel Active Pressure = 1,867.4 3.44 6,430.1 Toe Active Pressure = 0.50 Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = Seismicl-oad = Total = 1,867.4 O.T.M. = 6,430.1 Resisting/Overturning Ratio = 1.84 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 3,971.3 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Soil Over Heel = Sloped Soil Over Hee = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem= Soil Over Toe Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) _ Earth @ Stem Transitions = Footing Weight = Key Weight = Vert. Component _ Total = 940.8 3.79 3.567.1 0.00 110.0 1.00 110.0 1,071.7 2.54 2,719.4 390.9 3.00 1,172.6 637.5 2.13 1,354.7 300.0 2.25 675.0 520.5 4.25 2,211.9 3,971.3 Ibs R.M.= 11,810.7 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each page. Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope : Job # Date: 10:27AM, 11 JUN 01 6..: 510s Page 1 p�eKWe�g��.; sr= r�9 Win3 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design c \ec \n 1 .31 R ecwCala Ja Pmnc Description 9.33ft level Criteria FoofinglISal Fnctior = 0.330 Retained Height = 9.33 it Wall height above soil = 0.00 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Boll Data FoofinglISal Fnctior = 0.330 Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 ft Footing Strengths & Dimensions rc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 2.00 ft Heel Width = 2.25 Total Footing Widtf T75- Footing Thickness = 12.00 in FoofinglISal Fnctior = 0.330 Key Width _ 12.00 in Wind m Stem' = 0.0 psf Soil height to ignore Key Depth _ 24.00 in for passive pressure = 6.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 1.75 ft Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm = 3.00 in Design Summa Stem Construction Top Stem 2nd 3rd Stem OK Stain OK Stem OK Total Bearing Load = 3,958 Ibs Design height ft= 4.00 2.00 0.00 ...resultant ecc. = 9.32 in Wall Material Above 'Ht" = Masonry Masonry Masonry Thickness 6.00 12.00 12.00 Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,957 psf OK _ Rebar Size # 5 # 6 # 6 Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Rebar Spacing - 24.00 16.00 16.00 Allowable = 2,000 psf Rebar Placed at = Edge Edge Edge Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable Design Data ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,245 psf fb /FB + fa/Fa = 0.964 0.789 0.895 ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Total Force @ Section Ibs = 497.2 940.3 1,523.4 Footing Shear @ Toe = 27.5 psi OK Moment.... Actual ft-#= 883.3 2,297.4 4,737.6 Fooling Shear @ Heel = 28.9 psi OK Moment..... Allowable ft-#= 916.4 2,911.7 5,294.8 Allowable = 85.0 psi Shear..... Actual psi = 8.7 9.7 15.7 Wall Stability Ratios Shear..... Allowable psi = 19.4 19.4 38.7 Overturning = 1.83 OK Sliding = 1.66 OK Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. In = 30.00 36.00 36.00 Sliding Calm (Vertical Component Used) Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Ht. in = 30.00 36.00 6.00 Lateral Sliding Force 1,867.4 Ibs Wall Weight psf= 78.0 124.0 124.0 less 100% Passive Form - 1,800.0 Ibs Rebar Depth 'd' in = 5.25 9.00 9.00 less 100% Friction Force= - 1,306.1 Ibs Masonry Data I'm = 1,500 1,500 1,500 Added Force Req'd Force eq'di = 0.0 Ibs OK psi Fs psi= 24,000 24,000 24,000 ....for Stability = o.01bs OK Solid Grouting - Yes Yes Yes Footin Design Results Special Inspection = No No Yes Modular Ratio'n' = 25.78 25.78 25.78 Too Heel Short Term Factor = 1.000 1.000 1.000 Factored Pressure = 2,245 0 psf Equiv. Solid Thick. In= 7.60 11.62 11.62 Mu': Upward = 4,628 0 ft-# Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Mu': Downward = 726 2,959 ft-# Concrete Data Mu: Design = 3,902 2,959 ft-# Pc psi = Actual 1 -Way Shear 27.50 28.86 psi Fy psi = Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Other Acceptable Sizes 3 Spacings Toe Reinforcing = None Speed Toe: #4@ 17.50 in, #5@ 27.25 in, #6@ 38.50 in, #7@ 48.25 in, #8@ 48.25 in, #9@ 4 Heel Reinforcing = None Speed Heel: #4@ 19.75 in, #5@ 30.50 in, #6@ 43.25 in, #7@ 48.25 in, #8@ 48.25 in, #9@ 4 Key Reinforcing = None Speed Key: #4@ 18.75 in, #5@ 28.75 in, #6@ 40. To specify your title block on Title : Job # Dsgnr: Date: 10:27AM, 11 JUN 01 these five lines, use the SETTINGS Description selection on the main menu and enter your title block Information Scope: will be printed on each page. Use 310300 User. xW 0301353, Ve. 5.1.3. 22dun1933, wn32 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 2 c: �ec�01318.ecw:Calcuations Description 9.33ft level of Item Heel Active Pressure = Toe Active Pressure = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SeismicLoad = no & Resisting Forces & M ...- OVERTURNING..... Fora Distance Moment Ibs It Rat 1,867.4 3.44 6,430.1 0.50 Total = 1,867.4 O.T.M. = 6,430.1 Resisting /Overturning Ratio = 1.83 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 3,958.0 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Ibs R flak Soil Over Heel = 1,282.9 3.63 4,650.4 Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = 0.00 Soil Over Toe = 110.0 1.00 110.0 Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 911.7 2.42 2,210.1 Earth @ Stem Transitions 2.83 553.7 Footing Weight = 637.5 2.13 1,354.7 Key Weight = 300.0 2.25 675.0 Vert. Component - 520.5 425 2,211.9 Total = 3,958.0 Ill R.M.= 11,765.8 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each page. Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope : Job # Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 Nee 510300 Page 1 Ufe� ICa9601355, 5.13. 3:.,.�. IM, wm32 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design _ r�nr�nl.itA arw T.alni Ufinnc 1Oft level Criteria 1,681 psf OK Retained Height = 10.00 it Wall height above soil = 0.00 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem' = 0.0 psf Design Summa Total Bearing Load = 5,468 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 6.44 In Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,681 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 403 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 1,931 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 463 psi Footing Shear @ Toe = 26.7 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 42.7 psi OK Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios Ibs = Overturning = 2.47 OK Sliding = 1.70 OK Sliding Calcs (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 2,117.5 lbs less 100% Passive Force= - 1,800.0 Ibs less 100% Friction Force= - 1,804.6 Ibs Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2.000.0 psi Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 It Footing][Soil Friclioi = 0.330 Sal height to ignore for passive pressure = 6.00 in Stem Construction = 0.0 Ibs OK Design height ft= Wall Material Above "Ht" _ Thickness = Rebar Size = Rebar Spacing = Rebar Placed at = Design Data 0 ft-# fb /FB r fa /Fa = Total Force @ Section Ibs = Moment.... Actual ft-#= Moment ..... Allowable ft-#= Shear..... Actual psi= Shear..... Allowable psi= Added Force Req d = 0.0 Ibs OK ....for 1.5: 1 Stabillty = 0.0 Ibs OK Footing Design Results 24.00 8.00 Toe Heel Factored Pressure = 1,931 463 psf Mu' : Upward = 4,664 0 ft-# Mu': Downward = 781 6,353 it-# Mu: Design = 3,882 6,353 ft-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 26.75 42.72 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd Key Reinforcing = None Specd Footing Strengths 8 Dimensions rc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 2.00 It Heel Width = 3.25 Total Footing Width 525 Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 12.00 in Key Depth = 24.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 1.75 It Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in a Stem 2nd 3rd Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK 4.67 0.00 0.00 Masonry Masonry Masonry 8.00 16.00 16.00 # 5 # 6 # 6 24.00 8.00 8.00 Edge Edge Edge 0.864 8.858 497.2 1.750.0 883.3 916.4 8.7 19.4 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in= 30.00 Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Ht. in = 30.00 Wall Weight psf= 78.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in = 5.25 Masonry Data I'm psi = 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Special inspection = No Modular Ration' = 25.78 Short Tenn Factor = 1.000 Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 7.60 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi = Fy psi = 5,833.3 6,792.2 12.8 19.4 36.00 36.00 164.0 13.00 1,500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.000 15.62 0.858 1,750.0 5,833.3 6,792.2 12.8 19.4 36.00 6.00 164.0 13.00 1,500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.000 15.62 Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: #4@ 17.75 in, #5@ 27.25 in, #6@ 38.75 in, #7@ 48.25 in, #8@ 48.25 in, #9@ 4 Heel: #4@ 10.75 in, #5@ 16.50 in, #6@ 23.50 In, #7@ 32.00 in, #8@ 42.00 in, #9@ 4 Key: #4@ 18.75 in, #5@ 28.75 in, #6@ 40. To specify your title block on Title: Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 selection on the main menu and Description enter your title block information Scope: will be printed on each page. 610300 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page z Uw' rcW0E0135`.. Vsr 5 1 3. 22dun1999. Win32 (01Me ENER C _ c \ec \01318.ecw:calculations Description 1 Oft level Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments LLLLJ .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Foie Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs ft ft-# Ibs ft R-# Heel Active Pressure = Toe Active Pressure = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SeismicLoad = 2,117.5 3.67 7,764.2 0.50 Total = 2,117.5 O.T.M. = 7,764.2 Resisting /Overturning Ratio = 2.47 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 5,468.5 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Soil Over Heel = 2,108.3 4.29 9,048.3 Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = 0.00 Soil Over Toe = 110.0 1.00 110.0 Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 1.181.6 2.55 3,012.4 Earth @ Stem Transitions= 390.9 3.00 1,172.6 Footing Weight = 787.5 2.63 2,067.2 Key Weight = 300.0 2.25 675.0 Vert. Component _ 590.2 5.25 3,098.3 Total = 5,468.5 Ibs R.M.= 19,183.8 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block Information will be printed on each page. Title: Dsgnr: Description Scope: Job # Dale: 6:31PM, 31 MAR 01 "°'°° Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page '' U . Nw:06°13!!. Vw !.12. 22Jvnd999.wm32 . _ ��.��M .R1R xwCatrnlaflnnc 12ft level Criteria 1,899 psi OK Retained Height = 12.001t Wall height above soil = 0.00 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 6.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem' = 0.0 psi Design Summary Total Bearing Load = 9,926 lbs ...resultant ecc. = 7.25 In Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,899 psi OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 540 psf OK Allowable = 2•000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,216 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 630 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 28.5 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 51.3 psi OK Allowable = 85.0 psi Wall Stability Ratios from Toe Overturning = 2.55 OK Sliding = 1.53 OK Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 300.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 ft Footing Strengths &Dimensions fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 2.50ft Heel Width = 4.00 Total Footing Widtr = X56 Footing Thickness = 15.00 in FootingIlSoil Fdcbor = 0.330 = 3,072.3 lbs less 100% Passive Force= - 2.071.9 lbs less 100% Friction Face= - 2,615.7 lbs Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ibs OK Key Width = 0.0 lbs OK _ , 12.00 In Soil height to ignore _oe Heel Key Depth 2,216 630 psf _ 24.00 in for passive pressure = 6.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 1.75 ft Actual 1 -Way Shear = 28.47 51.33 psi Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Bbn.= 3.00 In Stem Construction Top Stem 2nd 3rd 4th None Spec'd Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK Design height ft= 6.67 4.67 2.00 0.00 Wall Material Above "Ht" = Masonry Masonry Masonry Masonry Thickness in= 8.00 12.00 16.00 16.00 Reber Size = # 5 # 5 # 6 # 6 Rebar Spacing = 24.00 16.00 8.00 8.00 Rebar Placed at = Edge Edge Edge Edge Design Data fb /FB +fa/Fa = 9.964 0.896 0.1159 9.742 Total Force @ Section lbs = 497.2 940.3 1,750.0 2,520.0 Moment.... Actual ft-#= 883.3 2,297.4 5,833.3 10,080.0 Sliding Calcs (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 3,072.3 lbs less 100% Passive Force= - 2.071.9 lbs less 100% Friction Face= - 2,615.7 lbs Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ibs OK ....for 1.5 : 1 Stability = 0.0 lbs OK Footing Design Results psi= _oe Heel Factored Pressure = 2,216 630 psf Mu' : Upward = 7,969 0 ft-# Mu': Downward = 1,363 13,379 ft-# Mu: Design = 6,606 13,379 ft -# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 28.47 51.33 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 85.00 85.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Moment..... Allowable ft-#= 916.4 Shear..... Actual psi = 8.7 Shear ..... Aliowable psi= 19.4 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. In = 30.00 Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht. in = 30.00 Wall Weight psf= 78.0 Rebar Depth 'd' In = 5.25 Masonry Data fm psi= 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = Yes Special Inspection = No Modular Ratio'n' = 25.78 Short Term Facia = 1.000 Equiv. Solid Thick, in = 7.60 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi= Fy psi = 2,563.0 9.6 19.4 30.00 30.00 124.0 9.00 1,500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.000 11.62 6,792.2 12.8 19.4 36.00 36.00 164.0 13.00 1,500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.000 15.62 13,584.4 18.4 38.7 36.00 8.44 164.0 13.00 1,500 24,000 Yes Yes 25.78 1.000 15.62 Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: #4@ 14.00 in, #5@ 21.75 in, #6@ 30.75 in, #7@ 42.00 in, #8@ 48.25 in, #9@ 4 Heel: #4@ 7.00 in, #5@ 10.75 in, #6@ 15.00 in, #7@ 20.50 in, #8@ 27,00 in. #9@ 34 Key: #4@ 18.75 in, #5@ 28.75 in, #6@ 40. To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each page. W 5103 Unr["M1355, 9er 51.3. 22 JV 1999, YJ,n32 (e) I%3 59 ENEN C Description . 12ft level Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope: Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Job # Date: 6:31 PM, 31 MAR 01 Page 2 summary of overtuming & Resisting Forces & Moments .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Heel Active Pressure 3,012.3 4.4z u,xxo Toe Active Pressure 0.58 Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load Q Stem Above Soil = SeismicLoad = Total = 3,072.3 O.T.M. = 13,569.5 Resisting/Overturning Ratio = 2.55 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 7.926.3 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Sal Over Heel = Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Fooling Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = Soil Over Toe Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) _ Earth @ Stem Transitions = Footing Weight = Key Weight = Vert Component _ Total = 3,520.0 5.17 18,186.7 0.00 137.5 1.25 171.9 1,429.6 3.04 4,347.2 464.2 3.53 1,636.9 1,218.7 3.25 3,960.9 300.0 2.25 675.0 856.3 6.50 5,565.8 7,926.3 Ibs R.M.- 34,544.4 5. ), -'A'4 L t(-T-. �.f /_ -. GJ ykA PcsNS:r-,T"7A L-J- S; S LT-7 pO-J S A (2_ 8 c RACCS AeS f =kt,7ZZO"Q CSD a ra u PC ATE - a a� j -Dr- P`Apj S . 2 (j2AirdAGc MSCvi►2 tt!'aJi`5 A(2a 1)STaM2rvli��D ALwrLOI G0 cer�o)nO�vS, THIS e CLOKa-" I AID rCA, rs�o rN 7>�c 5�rc.S D2c0o UP�� p s �.r.c9�Q -AL s+►E� T 5 bi 2�LY rHE So, (-- g aS09*0 `-, . 1P(r�ASiEE To DeTA)L- )%62 a,jp Att- WALE aN S'fl-e:v�1 6 zf o u P taa ;pro PL-A"6 so AjEc a�«cr -rmg CiPop p 5vr 7777-77. JUN 15 2M im000469.jpg (l600xl200x24b jpeg) .0.*A im000470.jpg (l600xl200x24b jpeg) im000470.jpg (l600xl200x24b jpeg) a im000468.jpg (l600xl200x24b jpeg) 11' ,S U] /16 /LOUD 11:aJ UJU4JGU1 11 bt+N U:L�aU PAGE 02 1 I A GTG Company Leighton and Associates GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT MEMORANDUM To: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Date: September 14, 2000 Encinitas Town Center, LLC 9823 Pacific Heights Boulevard, Suite 1 San Diego, California 92121 Project No. 940028 -029 Attention Mr. Rudy Medina From: Kevin B. Colson Subject: Temporary Backcut Stability, Proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Encinitas Town Center Lot 45, Encinitas, California References: Leighton and Associates, Inc., 2000, Update Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Encinitas Town Center Lot 45, Encinitas, California. Project No. 4940028 -029, dated April 26, 2000- SB &O, Inc., 2000, Preliminary Grading Plans for Encinitas Ranch Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Sheets l through 4, Scale: 1 " =30 ". This project memorandum has been in accordance with your request to address the stability of the proposed temporary backcut to be excavated around the proposed building foundation for the Proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Encinitas Town Center Lot 45, Encinitas, Califomia. According to the preliminary grading plans for the site (SB &O, 2000), up to a temporary 1 I foot -tall backcut is to be excavated outside of the proposed building limits to allow for constructionof the foundation and walls for the proposed structure and underground parking. Specifically detail B -2 on sheet 2 of 4 shows a 5 -foot vertical cut below a 6 -foot tall 1:1 backcut forming a composite II foot-tall backcut (SB &0,2000). Based on review of our updated investigation and stability analysis of the proposed backcut it is our professional opinion that the proposed temporary backcut will not be sufficiently stable in the on site soils However, based on our stability analysis we provide the following alternative temporary slope design. We recommend the backcut excavation be cut at a 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) inclination from the top of the excavation to the bottom with no vertical sections_ We also recommend the excavation be observed by a representative of this office to confirm the stability of the temporary backcut. In addition we recommend that the excavation be re- evaluated by representatives of this office on a monthly basis and that the temporary excavation not be left open for a period greater than 4- months. 8 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, #B205, San Olego, CA 9213 -4425 (619) 292.8030 • FAX (619) 292 -0771 • www.leightongeo. con, i l e n Y[.b �vbU. / /10 /VV ,I:4JAM� � UtlU ul lU� I-dyb t 07/18/2000 12:30 8582° X771 SAN DIEGO rr waft- A GTa Company Leighton and Associates PAGE 02 G E 0 T E C H N I C A L C O N S U L T A N T S April 26, 2000 Project No 4940028.029 To. Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Encinitas Ranch L.L.C. 9823 Pacific Heights Boulevard, Suite I San Diego, California 92121 Attention. Mr. Rudy Medina Subject: Update Geotechnical investigation, Proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments ,EncinitasTow n Center Lot 45, Encinitas, California In accordance with your request and authorization, we have conducted a geotechnical investigation for the proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion that the site can be improved to receive the proposed improvements. The accompanying report presents a summary of our current investigation and provides gootechnical conclusions and recommendations relative to the proposed site development. If you have any questions regarding our report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, y E{tED GfO� LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CGS N0. 130 �2'p CERTIFIED — /( ENOINEERIMO Kevin B. ColsonGEOLOOI6T Senior Staff Geologi r _ � Of CAUfO� �s�e�1 A An Sean Cafe 0 R / ichaal R. Stewart, G 1349 (Exp. 12111 /0 1) Senior Project Engineer 'jp 540a1 a President/Principal Geologist XBC /SAC/MRS Distribution: (4) Addr F OA 6 y San Diego, CA 9213 -4425 3934 Murphy Canyon Road. #B206. g (819) 292.8030 - FAX (859) 292.0771 • WWW.Itlghtongdo.com 07/18/2000 12:30 8582970771 SAN DIEGO PAGE 03 4940028.029 1� 6 Segmental Retaining Wall DUS -t Retaining walls may be considered at several locations on the subject property. Settlement - sensitive structures should be set back from the top of the wall at a minimum distance equal to the wall-tttight As a minimum, segmental wall design should conform to NCMA and the manufacture's design procedures. Appropriate geotechnical design parameters for the crib -lock or reinforced earth type retaining walls are provided below. iFriction angle of backfill soils 32 degrees Cohesion 0 psf Weight of backfill soils 125 -130 psf Allowable bearing capacity 2 ,OOOpsf(I8 inch minimum embedment) (18 inches minimum width) Expansion index <50 (per UBC Test 18.2) L Temporary backcut per OSHA Seismic Acceleration 0.30g �y Adequate drainage should be designed behind the wall by the wall design engineer and reviewed by the geotechnical consultant. Typical drainage includes a PVC pipe surrounded by gravel and filter cloth with outlets into positive drainage facilities. Retaining wall back cuts should be observed and geologically mapped by the geotechnical consultant during construction. The purpose for this mapping is to substantiate the geological conditions that we have assumed in our analysis. In order to expedite the geologic mapping of these temporary slopes by our field geologist, we recommend that the grading contractortrim these cuts with a slope board as they are excavated. In general, to reduce the potential for back cut failures, we recommend that the stability fill excavation and embankment be planned to minimize the time the back cut remains open and unsupported bycompactedfill. 6 7 Geochrm_ cal Considers ions `y Geochemical screening of the onsite soils was performed. The screening is meant to serve as an indicator for the design professionals in determining the level of input necessary from a qualified corrosion engineer. Review of geochemical test results by a corrosion engineer is recommended. Concrete in direct contact with soil or water that contains a high concentration of soluble sulfates can be subject to chemical deterioration commonly known as "sulfate attack." Soluble sulfate results (Appendix C) indicated a soluble sulfate content less than 0.1 percent. Uniform Building Code Table 19 -A -4 provides minimum concrete design requirements based on sulfate exposure conditions. 17. mom ,./ 12 aw UPDATE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, PROPOSED POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS, ENCINITAS TOWN CENTER LOT 45, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA Project No, 4940028 -029 April 26, 2000 Prepared For POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS ENCINITAS TOWN CENTER, LLC 9823 Pacific Heights Boulevard, Suite J San Diego, California 92121 ZZ M A GTG Company Leighton and Associates GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS April 26, 2000 Project No. 4940028.029 To: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Encinitas Ranch L.L.C. 9823 Pacific Heights Boulevard, Suite J San Diego, California 92121 Attention: Mr. Rudy Medina Subject: Update Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Encinitas Town Center Lot 45, Encinitas, California In accordance with your request and authorization, we have conducted a geotechnical investigation for the proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion that the site can be improved to receive the proposed improvements. The accompanying report presents a summary of our current investigation and provides geotechnical conclusions and recommendations relative to the proposed site development. If you have any questions regarding our report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, ��RED Gfp LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. �4 �0 R. SP NO. 1349�'Ij E- �.-� -- r • = CERTiFlED ENGINEERING Kevin B. Colson GEOLOGIST Senior Staff Geologis ' ' - � � n �� CAL1F0� .�� a Sean C01-44do, RCE -540 Senior Project Engineer W Cr KBC /SAC /MRS 1 Distribution: (4) Ad h- ! )Fchael R. Stewart, CEG 1349 (Exp. 12/31/01) No. e President/Principal Geologist U 1 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, #B205, San Diego, CA 92123 -4425 (858) 292 -8030 • FAX (858) 292 -0771 • www.leightongeo.com • TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE .......................................... ............................... 1.2 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION .................... ............................... 1.3 PREVIOUS SITE DEVELOPMENT .......................... ............................... 1.4 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ................................. ............................... 2.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 3.0 SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS 3.1 GEOLOGIC SETTING........ 3.2 SITE - SPECIFIC GEOLOGY 4940028 -029 Page 3 3 3 4 5 5 5 3.2.1 Artificial Fill (Map Symbol— Afi ............................................................................ ..............................5 3.2.1 Tertiary TorreySandstone (Map Symbol— TI) ......................................................... ..............................6 3.3 GEOLOGIC STRUCTURE ..................................................................................................... ..............................6 3.4 I.. ANDS LIDING ................................................................................................................... ............................... 6 3.5 Sup FACE AND GROUND WATER ....................................................................................... ....................._........6 4.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY...._ ............................... .. ...... ._ ....... ............... ...... _......_ .. 7 4.1 FAULTING .......................................................................................................................... ..............................7 4.2 SEISMICITY ........................................................................................................................ ..............................7 4.2.1 Shallow Ground Rupture ....................................................................................... ............................... 8 4.2.2 Liquefaction and Dynamic Settl ement ................................................................... ............................... 8 4.23 Tsunamis and Seiches ............................................................................................. ..............................9 5.0 CONCLUSI ONS ........................................................................._._..._................................ .............................10 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................ ...... .. ... .. .................... ._............... .... ..._........................... . 6.1 EARTHWORK .................................................................................................................. ............................... 11 6.1.1 Site Preparation ................................................................................................... ............................... 11 6.1.2 Excavations and Oversize Material ..................................................................... ............................... 11 6.1.3 Fill Placement and Compaction .......................................................................... ............................... 12 6.1.4 Removal of Unsuitable Soil s ................................................................................ ............................... 12 6.1.5 Transition Lots ..................................................................................................... ............................... 12 6.2 SLOPE S TABILITY ........................................................................................................... ............................... 13 6.2.1 De ated'Mabili ................................................... .............................13 6.2.2 Sur tcial Slope Stability .............................. ............................... 13 I 4940028 -029 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6.3 SURFACE DRAINAGE AND EROSION ............................................................................... ............................... 14 6.4 CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION AND SLAB CONSIDERATIONS ......................................... ............................... 14 64.1 Shallow Spread Footings Foundat ions ................................................................ ............................... 14 64.2 Floor Slabs ............................................................................................................. .............................15 6.4.3 Concrete Flatwork ............................................................................................... ............................... 15 64.4 Settlement ............................................................................................................. .............................15 6.5 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES ......................................................................................... ............................... 16 6.6 SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN ......................................................................... ............................... 17 6.7 GEOCHEMICAL CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................. ............................... 17 6.8 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN ................................................................................. ............................... 18 6.9 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION ...................................................................................... ............................... 19 6.10 PLAN REVIEW ................................................................................................................ ............................... 19 7.0 LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................... ............................... 20 Tables Table 1 — Seismic Parameters for Active Faults — Page 7 Table 2 — Recommended Wire-Mesh Reinforcement of Concrete Flatwork — Page 15 Figure Figure 1 — Site Location Map — Page 2 Plate Plate I — Geotechnical Map — In Pocket Appendices Appendix A — References Appendix B — Boring Logs Appendix C — Laboratory Data Analysis Appendix D — Seismic Analyses Appendix E — General Earthwork and Grading Specifications 11 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope 4940028 -029 This report presents the results of our updated geotechnical investigation for the proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments to be situated within Lot 45 of the Encinitas Town Center development, in Encinitas, California. The purpose of our investigation was to identify and evaluate the existing significant geotechnical conditions present at the site and to provide preliminary conclusions and geotechnical recommendations relative to the proposed development. Our scope of services included: • Review of available pertinent, published and unpublished geotechnical literature and maps. References cited are listed in Appendix A. • Field reconnaissance of the existing onsite geotechnical conditions. • Subsurface exploration consisting of the excavation, logging, and sampling of 10 exploratory borings. The logs of these borings are presented in Appendix B. • Laboratory testing of representative soil samples obtained from the subsurface exploration program. Results of these tests are presented in Appendix C. The results of the moisture /density determinations are included on the boring logs (Appendix B). • Compilation and analysis of the geotechnical data obtained from the field investigation and laboratory testing. • Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, and geotechnical recommendations with respect to the proposed design site grading and general construction considerations. 1 16111N NNW BASE MAP: Thomas Bros. GeoFinder for Windows, San Diego County, 1995, Page 1147 Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Encinitas Town Center Lot 4S Encinitas, California 0 1000 2000 4000 1 "= 2,000' - �� Scale in Feet SITE Project No. LOCATION 940028 -029 fig Date MAP April 2000 Figure No. 1 4940028 -029 1.2 Site Location and Description The proposed development is planned within Lot 45 of the Encinitas Ranch development. The site is located west of the intersection of Garden View Road and Via Cantebria in Encinitas, California (Figure 1, page 2). The roughly triangular- shaped site consists of a previously mass - graded building pad with east - facing 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope on the west side of the lot that ascends approximately 35 -feet to a native hillside. Smaller slopes are also present on the southeast and northeast margins. The site is bounded by an undeveloped natural hillside to the west, Via Cantebria to the southeast and Garden View Road to the northeast. Topographically, the site consists of a gently sloping sheet - graded pad with a gentle fall to a desilting basin located on the northeast side of the site. An asphalt swale drains to the desilting basin along the Garden View Road side of the lot and along a portion of Via Cantebria side. A concrete v -ditch runs along the top of the slope on the west side of the lot. Elevations within the sheet - graded portion of the site vary from approximately 211 feet mean sea level (msl) in the southern corner of the lot to approximately 195 feet msl in the desilting basin on the northeast side of the site. The elevations for the 2:1 slope on the west side of the site range from approximately 210 feet msl at the toe of slope to 256 feet msl at the top of slope. Surface drainage is controlled on the site by surface flow over the majority of the site and by the asphalt - lined brow ditch on the northeast and southeast property lines. 1.3 Previous Site Development The site was previously graded during grading operations for the Encinitas Town Center development (Leighton, 1996). Removal of potentially compressible soils reached a maximum depth of 40 feet on the site in a canyon clean -out in the northern portion of the site. The bedrock soils on the site were overexcavated to reduce future fill differentials on the lot and to supply export soils to other portions of the Encinitas Town Center development. Fill soils were placed under the observation and testing of Leighton and Associates and range from 5 to 40 feet in thickness across the site. The majority of the 2:1 slope on the west side of the lot was constructed as a replacement fill slope with the exception of the southern approximately 200 feet which was constructed as a 2:1 cut slope. A subdrain was placed below the toe of the fill slope and drains in a northerly direction where it has been outleued into the storm drain system north of the site on Garden View Road. 1.4 Proposed Development It is our understanding that the proposed development will include the grading for and construction of an apartment complex consisting of four -story apartment structures, a single story recreation /leasing building, and associated improvements. The lower level of the four -story apartment structure will be used for parking and will be partially buried. Associated concrete flatwork, driveways, and landscaping are also anticipated as part of the development. A segmental retaining wall is proposed in place of the 2:1 replacement fill /cut slope along the westerly side of the property. 3- 4940028 -029 2.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Subsurface exploration was performed on March 30, 2000. Our subsurface exploration consisted of the excavation of ten exploratory borings to approximate depths of 12 to 22 feet below the existing ground surface. The purpose of these borings was to evaluate the physical characteristics and engineering properties of the onsite soils pertinent to the proposed development. The borings allowed evaluation of the soils to be encountered at foundation elevations in proposed cut areas, the general nature of the onsite soils for use as compacted fills, evaluation of the previously placed fill soils, and provided representative samples for laboratory testing. The exploratory borings were logged by a geologist from our firm. Representative drive and bulk samples were obtained for laboratory testing. The approximate locations of the explorations are shown on Plate 1 (in pocket). After logging and sampling, the borings were backfilled. Laboratory testing performed on representative soil samples included: collapse tests, direct shear, maximum density determination, expansion index, moisture /densities, and geochemical screening of the subsurface soils. A discussion of the laboratory tests performed and a summary of the laboratory test results are presented in Appendix C. In -situ moisture and density test results are provided on the boring logs (Appendix B). 4 4940028 -029 3.0 SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS 3.1 Geologic Setting The site is located in the coastal section of the Peninsular Range Province, a geomorphic province with a long and active geologic history throughout Southern California. Throughout the last 54 million years, the area known as "San Diego Embayment" has undergone several episodes of marine inundation and subsequent marine regression, resulting in the deposition of a thick sequence of marine and nonmarine sedimentary rocks on the basement rock of the Southern California batholith. Gradual emergence of the region from the sea occurred in Pleistocene time, and numerous wave - cut platforms, most of which were covered by relatively thin marine and nonmarine terrace deposits, formed as the sea receded from the land. Accelerated fluvial erosion during periods of heavy rainfall, coupled with the lowering of the base sea level during Quaternary times, resulted in the rolling hills, mesas, and deeply incised canyons which characterize the lndforms we see in the general site area today. 3.2 Site - Specific Geology Based on our subsurface exploration and review of pertinent geologic literature, maps, and reports the site is underlain by documented compacted fill soils and the Torrey Sandstone. The approximated areal limits of each of the geologic units are indicated on the Geotechnical Map (Plate 1). A brief description of the geologic units encountered on the site is presented below. 3.2.1 Artificial Fill (Map Symbol — Af) Documented compacted artificial fill soils (Leighton, 1996, Appendix A) placed during rough - grading operations for the Encinitas Town Center development are present at the surface of the entire Lot 45 site. These fill soils were placed as part of the mass grading of the Encinitas Town Center developmentand range in thickness from 5 to 40 feet across the site. The fill soils were derived from on site materials and soils generated from grading in other areas of the Encinitas Town Center development. The fill soils are characterized by light brown to brown, generally damp, dense, silty fine to medium sand. The fill soils were tested to have a very low expansion potential (Appendix C). 5 �� 4940028 -029 3.2.2 Tertiary TorreySandstone(MapSymbol — Tt) The Tertiary-aged Torrey Sandstone was encountered in exploratory borings B -7 and B- 8 depths of 13 and 20 feet below the ground surface. In addition, the Torrey Sandstone is exposed in the natural bluffs and ridges along the western property boundary and was encountered underlying the documented fill soils during site grading. The majority of the Torrey Sandstone, as encountered, consists of light gray to light yellow - brown, silty, fine -to coarse - grained, sandstone. 3.3 Geologic Structure Based on our field observations during our update investigation and site grading, the Torrey Sandstone generally consists of massive sandstone units with bedding attitudes within a few degrees of horizontal. Localized steeper bedding which can be attributed to cross bedding can be observed in areas. 3.4 Landslidint No ancient landslides have been mapped on the site and no evidence of landsliding was observed during our site investigation. 3.5 Surface and Ground Water Ground water was not observed in our excavations, nor was it encountered during grading operations for Lot 45. However ground water levels will fluctuate during periods of high precipitation. Ground water is not expected to impact the proposed development if the recommendations regarding drainage outlined in this report are implemented. -6- 1 _`M� 4.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY 4.1 Faulting 4940028.029 Our discussion of faults on the site is prefaced with a discussion of California legislation and policies conceming the classification and land -use criteria associated with faults. By definition of the California Mining and Geology Board, an active fault is a fault that has had surface displacement within Holocene time (about the last 11,000 years). The state geologist has defined a potentially active fault as any fault considered to have been active during Quaternary time (last 1,600,000 years). This definition is used in delineating Earthquake Fault Zones as mandated by the Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act and as subsequently revised in 1997. The intent of this act is to assure that unwise urban development and certain habitable structures do not occur across the traces of active faults. The subject site is not included within any Earthquake Fault Zones as created by the Alquist - Priolo Act (Hart, 1997). Our review of available geologic literature (Appendix A) indicates that there are no known major or active faults on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. The nearest active regional fault is the Rose Canyon Fault Zone located approximately 4.3 miles west of the site. 4.2 Seismicity The site can be considered to lie within a seismically active region, as can all of southem Califomia. Site specific evaluation of the earthquake hazard was performed using a deterministic and a probabilistic approach. A summary of our deterministic evaluation is provided in Table 1. Table 1 Seismic Parameters for Active Faults (Blake, 1996 and 1998, CDMG, 1996) Maximum Credible Earthquake Distance from Moment Peak Ground Acceleration Fault Fault to Site Magnitude (g) Rose Canyon 43 miles (7 km) 6.9 0.64 Newport- I I miles (I8 km) 6.9 0.36 Inglewood Elsinore- 26 miles (42 km) 6.8 0.18 Temecula Elsinore- 26 miles (42 km) 7.1 0.21 Julian -7 a 4940028 -029 Based on a deterministic approach, Table 1 presents the peak ground acceleration that we postulate could be produced by the maximum credible earthquake. The maximum credible earthquake is defined as the maximum event that a fault is capable of producing considering the known tectonic setting. Site - specific seismic parameters reported are the distances to the causative faults, earthquake magnitudes, and expected peak ground accelerations. As indicated in Table 1, the Rose Canyon fault zone is considered to have the most significant affect at the site from a design standpoint. The maximum credible earthquake is expected to produce a peak ground surface acceleration at the site of 0.648. The Rose Canyon Fault Zone is considered a type B seismic source according to ICBO, 1997, Table 16 -U. The earthquake source data used for analysis of the ground motion was obtained from the California Division of Mining and Geology (CDMG, Open File Report 96 -08). A summary printout of the deterministic analysis is provided in Appendix D. The effect of seismic shaking may be mitigated by adhering to the Uniform Building Code and state -of -the -art seismic design parameters of the Structural Engineers Association of Califomia. The site is located within Seismic Zone 4 of the Uniform Building Code (ICBO, 1997, Figure 16 -2). The soil profile designation for the site is considered to be type Sp per the 1997 UBC, Table 16 -J. Secondary effects that can be associated with severe ground shaking following a relatively large earthquake include shallow ground rupture, soil liquefaction and dynamic settlement, seiches and tsunamis. These secondary effects of seismic shaking are discussed in the following sections. 4.2.1 Shallow Ground Rupture Ground rupture because of active faulting is not likely to occur on site due to the absence of known active faults. Cracking due to shaking from distant seismic events is not considered a significant hazard, although it is a possibility at any site. 4.2.2 Liquefaction and Dynamic Settlement Liquefaction and dynamic settlement of soils can be caused by strong vibratory motion due to earthquakes. Both research and historical data indicate that loose, saturated, granular soils are susceptible to liquefaction and dynamic settlement. Liquefaction is typified by a total loss of shear strength in the affected soil layer, thereby causing the soil to liquefy. This effect may be manifested by excessive settlements and sand boils at the ground surface. The onsite Artificial Fill and Torrey Sandstone materials encountered during our investigation are not considered liquefiable due to their physical characteristics and unsaturated condition. The Torrey Sandstone, which may be below the water table at depth, is not considered liquefiable due to its very high- density characteristics and cemented nature. -8- '� 4940028 -029 4.2.3 Tsunamis and Seiches Based on the distance between the site and large, open bodies of water, and the elevation of the site with respect to sea level, the possibility of seiches and /or tsunamis is considered to be very low. 9 �� 4940028 -029 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of our preliminary geotechnical investigation of the site, it is our opinion that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the following conclusions and recommendations are incorporated into the project plans and specifications. The following is a summary of the significant geotechnical factors that we expect may affect development of the site. • Active faults are not known to exist on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. A peak ground acceleration of 0.64g is postulated as a result of the maximum credible earthquake along the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. Based on subsurface exploration of the artificial fill soils and formational materials present on the site, we anticipate that these materials should be generally rippable with conventional heavy -duty earthwork equipment. Based on laboratory testing and visual classification, on site soil materials generally possess very low to low expansion potential. • Laboratory test results indicate the onsite soils have a negligible potential for sulfate attack on concrete and have a severe risk for acid (pH) attack on concrete. A corrosion engineer should be consulted to provide measures to mitigate corrosivity. The existing onsite soils appear to be suitable material for use as compacted fill provided they are relatively free of organic material, debris, and rock fragments larger than 6 inches in maximum dimension. Ground water was not encountered during our investigation, nor is ground water anticipated to be encountered during site excavation and construction- Cut-fill transition conditions should be identified during a review of the site grading plans. If transitional conditions are identified, we recommend undercutting the cut areas below building pads to provide at least 4 feet of fill beneath all footings and settlement sensitive improvements. 10- 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Earthwork 4940028 -029 We anticipate that earthwork at the site will consist of site preparation, excavation, and fill operations. We recommend that earthwork on the site be performed in accordance with the following recommendations and the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading included in Appendix E. In case of conflict, the following recommendations shall supersede those in Appendix E. 6.1.1 Site Preparation Prior to grading, all areas to receive structural fill, engineered structures, or hardscape should be cleared of surface and subsurface obstructions, including any existing debris and undocumented or loose fill soils, and stripped of vegetation. Removed vegetation and debris should be properly disposed off site. All areas to receive fill and/or other surface improvements should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, brought to near - optimum moisture conditions, and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction based on ASTM Test Method D1557. 6.1.2 Excavations and Oversize Material Shallow excavations of the onsite materials may generally be accomplished with conventional heavy -duty earthwork equipment. Heavy ripping or breaking will likely be required where cemented and concretionary lenses are encountered in deeper excavation. Excavation for utilities may also be difficult in some areas. Shallow, temporary excavations, such as utility trenches with vertical sides, in the engineered fill and formational materials should remain stable for the period required to construct the utility, provided they are free of adverse geologic conditions. In accordance with OSHA requirements, excavations deeper than 5 feet should be shored or be laid back if workers are to enter such excavations. Temporary sloping gradients should be determined in the field by a "competent person" as defined by OSHA. For preliminary planning, sloping of surficial soils at 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) may be assumed. Excavations greater than 20 feet in height will require an alternative sloping plan or shoring plan prepared by a California registered civil engineer. We do not anticipate significant amounts of oversize material to be generated during excavation of the on site soils. However, if oversized material is encountered during grading, recommendations for treatment of oversize material are included in the attached General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading (Appendix E). In addition, oversize material may be utilized in approved surface applications or hauled off site. AIM-- 4940028 -029 6.1.3 Fill Placement and Compaction All fill soils should be brought to a moisture content at or above optimum and compacted in uniform lifts to at least 90 percent relative compaction based on laboratory standard ASTM Test Method D1557. The optimum lift thickness required to produce a uniformly compacted fill will depend on the type and size of compaction equipment used. In general, fill should be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness. The onsite soils typically possesses a moisture content below optimum and may require moisture conditioning prior to use as compacted fill. Fills placed on slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical) should be keyed and benched into competent formational soils as indicated in the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading presented in Appendix E. Placement and compaction of fill should be performed in general accordance with the current City of Encinitas grading ordinances, sound construction practice, and the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading presented in Appendix E. 6.1.4 Removal of Unsuitable Soils All undocumented fill and loose surficial soils should be removed. These soils should be removed down to competent material. Scattered undocumented fill soils on the order of I to 3 feet thick may be encountered in isolated areas on the site. In general, where not removed by planned grading, we anticipate the depth of removals of undocumented fill to be on the order of 1 to 3 feet in depth. Loose surficial soils are expected to be encountered during abandonment of the onsite desalting basin. Removals in the desalting basin are estimated to be approximately 5 to 7 feet. 6.1.5 Transition Mitigation If design floor elevations cause a cut/fill transition condition to be exposed near planned footings, the cut areas of the lot should be overexcavated to a minimum depth of 4 feet below the bottoms of proposed foundations and replaced with properly compacted fill. The overexcavation should laterally extend at least 5 feet beyond the building pad area and all associated settlement- sensitive structures. Recompacted soil shall be properly moisture conditioned (as needed) to a near optimum moisture content and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1557). 12- aft*� 4940028 -029 6.2 Slope Stabilitv We understand the finish slopes up to 10 feet in height are planned at inclinations of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). The proposed configuration was analyzed for gross stability. 6.2.1 Deep- Seated Stability Analysis of the proposed slope configuration was performed using the computer program GSlope. Based on our field observations and previous testing of similar materials. strength parameters of � = 33 and c = 100 psf were used for Artificial Fills. Our analysis indicates that the proposed slopes have a calculated factor of safety of 1.5 or greater, with respect to potential deep rotational failure. We recommend that the geotechnical consultant document and geologically map all excavations during grading. The purpose of this mapping is to substantiate the geologic conditions assumed in our analysis. Additional investigation and stability analysis may be required if unanticipated or adverse conditions are encountered. 6.2.2 Surficial Slope Stability Sandy soils in the proposed fill slopes are highly susceptible to erosion and methods of slope stabilization should be implemented as soon as practical to reduce the potential for erosion. Erosion and /or surficial failure potential of fill slopes may be reduced if the following measures are implemented during design and construction of the slopes. Slope Face Compaction and Finishing We recommend slope faces be compacted by backrolling with a sheepsfoot roller generally at 2- to 3 -foot intervals of slope height. Slope finishing should be achieved by trimming and /or track rolling. - Slope Landscaping and Drainage We recommend that all graded slopes be landscaped with drought- tolerant, slope stabilizing vegetation as soon as possible to minimize the potential for erosion. Erosion control fabric should be considered while vegetation becomes established. In addition to the site drainage recommendations outlined in Section 6.3, design of surface drainage provisions are within the purview of the project civil engineer. -13- a 4940028 -029 6.3 Surface Drainage and Erosion Surface drainage should be controlled at all times. The proposed structure should have appropriate drainage systems to collect roof runoff. Positive surface drainage should be provided to direct surface water away from the structures toward the street or suitable drainage facilities. Positive drainage may be accomplished by providing a minimum 2 percent gradient from the structures. Below grade planters should not be situated adjacent to structures or pavements unless provisions for drainage such as catch basins and drains are made. In general, ponding of water should be avoided adjacent to structures or pavements. To help reduce the potential for excessive erosion of graded slopes, we recommend berms and /or swales be provided along the top of the slopes and lot drainage directed such that surface runoff on the slope faces is minimized. Protective measures to mitigate excessive site erosion during construction should also be implemented in accordance with the latest City of Encinitas grading ordinances. 6.4 Conventional Foundation and Slab Considerations Foundations and slabs should be designed in accordance with structural considerations and the following recommendations. These recommendations assume that the soils encountered within 5 feet of pad grade have a very low to low potential for expansion. If highly expansive soils are encountered and selective grading cannot be accomplished, additional foundation design may be necessary. 6.4.1 Shallow Spread Footings Foundations The proposed structures may be supported by conventional, continuous perimeter, or isolated spread footings. Footings should extend a minimum of 24 inches beneath the lowest adjacent finish grade. At these depths, footings founded in properly compacted fill soils may be designed for a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. The allowable pressures may be increased by one -third when considering loads of short duration such as wind or seismic forces. The minimum recommended width of footings is 18 inches for continuous footings and 24 inches for square or round footings. Footings should be designed in accordance with the structural engineer's requirements and have a minimum reinforcement of four No. 5 reinforcing bars (two top and two bottom). We recommend a minimum horizontal setback distance from the face of slopes for all structural footings and settlement- sensitive structures. This distance is measured from the outside edge of the footing, horizontally to the slope face (or to the face of a retaining wall) and should be a minimum of H/2, where H is the slope height (in feet). The setback should not be less than 10 feet and need not be greater than 15 feet. Please note that the soils within the structural setback area possess poor lateral stability, and improvements (such as retaining walls, sidewalks, fences, and improvements (such as 1 14- �� 4940028 -029 retaining walls, sidewalks, fences, pavements, etc.) constructed within this setback area may be subject to lateral movement and /or differential settlement. 6.4.2 Floor Slabs The slab -on -grade should be at least 5 inches thick and be reinforced with No. 3 rebars 18 inches on center or No. 4 rebars at 24 inches on center each way (minimum) placed at mid - height in the slab. Slabs should be underlain by a 2 -inch layer of clean sand or clean crushed gravel. If reduction of moisture migration up through the slab is desired, the sand or gravel layer should be additionally underlain by a visqueen moisture barrier underlain by an additional 2 inches of sand or gravel. We recommend control joints be provided across the slab at appropriate intervals as designed by the project architect. The potential for slab cracking may be reduced by careful control of water /cement ratios. The contractor should take appropriate curing precautions during the pouring of concrete in hot weather to minimize cracking of slabs. We recommend that a slipsheet (or equivalent) be utilized if grouted tile, marble tile, or other crack - sensitive floor covering is planned directly on concrete slabs. All slabs should be designed in accordance with structural considerations. If heavy vehicle or equipment loading is proposed for the slabs, greater thickness and increased reinforcing may be required. 6.4.3 Concrete Flatwork To reduce the separation of shrinkage cracks in driveways, sidewalks, patios, or other concrete flatwork, wire mesh reinforcement is suggested. The recommended type of wire mesh reinforcement is presented on Table 2. Table 2 Recommended Wire -Mesh Reinforcement of Concrete Flatwork Low Expansion Potential/Index Recommended Flatwork Reinforcement Very Low to Low (less than 50 6x6 -10 /10 welded -wire mesh per U.B.C. 18 -1 -1 ) Reinforcement should be placed at mid - height in concrete. Crack control joints should be provided at regular intervals as designed by the project architect. 6.4.4 Settlement The recommended allowable - bearing capacity is based on a maximum total and differential settlement of 1 inch and 3/4 inch, respectively. Since settlements are a function of footing size and contact bearing pressures, some differential settlement can be expected between adjacent columns or walls where a large differential loading condition exists. �AIS � 4940028 -029 6.5 Lateral Earth Pressures For design purposes, the following lateral earth pressure values for level or sloping backfill are recommended for walls backfilled with very low to low expansion potential. Static Equivalent Fluid Weight (pef) Conditions Level 2:1 Slope Active 35 55 At -Rest 55 65 Passive 300' (Maximum of3ksf) 150 (slopingdown) Unrestrained (yielding) cantilever walls up to 10 feet iri height should be designed for an active equivalent pressure value provided above. In the design of walls restrained from movement at the top (nonyielding) such as basement walls, the at -rest pressures should be used. If conditions other than those covered herein are anticipated, the equivalent fluid pressure values should be provided on an individual case basis by the geotechnical engineer. A surcharge load for a restrained or unrestrained wall resulting from automobile traffic may be assumed to be equivalent to a uniform pressure of 75 psf which is in addition to the equivalent fluid pressure given above. For other uniform surcharge loads, a uniform pressure equal to 0.35q should be applied to the wall (where q is the surcharge pressure in psf). Surcharge from heavy moving trucks can be analyzed by this office once design traffic loads are determined. The wall pressures assume walls are backfilled with free draining materials and water is not allowed to accommodate behind walls. A typical drainage design is contained in Appendix E. Wall backfill should be compacted by mechanical methods to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM D1557). Wall footings should be designed in accordance with the foundation design. recommendations and reinforced in accordance with structural considerations. For all retaining walls, we recommend a minimum horizontal distance from the outside base of the footing to daylight of 10 feet. Lateral soil resistance developed against lateral structural movement can be obtained from the passive pressure value provided above. Further, for sliding resistance, the friction coefficient of 0.33 may be used at the concrete and soil interface. These values may be increased by one -third when considering loads of short duration including wind or seismic loads. The total resistance may be taken as the sum of the frictional and passive resistance provided that the passive portion does not exceed two - thirds of the total resistance. AM 16 wa� NO 4940028 -029 Segmental Retaining Wall Design Retaining walls may be considered at several locations on the subject property. Settlement - sensitive structures should be set back from the top of the wall at a minimum distance equal to the wall height. As a minimum, segmental wall design should conform to NCMA and the manufacture's design procedures. Appropriate geotechnical design parameters for the crib -lock or reinforced earth type retaining walls are provided below: Friction angle of backfill soils Cohesion Weight of backfill soils Allowable bearing capacity (18 inches minimum width) Expansion index Temporary backcut Seismic Acceleration 32 degrees 0 psf 125 -130 psf 2,000 psf (18 inch minimum embedment) <50 (per UBC Test 18 -2) per OSHA 0.30g Adequate drainage should be designed behind the wall by the wall design engineer and reviewed by the geotechnical consultant. Typical drainage includes a PVC pipe surrounded by gravel and filter cloth with outlets into positive drainage facilities. Retaining wall back cuts should be observed and geologically mapped by the geotechnical consultant during construction. The purpose for this mapping is to substantiate the geological conditions that we have assumed in our analysis. In order to expedite the geologic mapping of these temporary slopes by our field geologist, we recommend that the grading contractor trim these cuts with a slope board as they are excavated. In general, to reduce the potential for back cut failures, we recommend that the stability fill excavation and embankment be planned to minimize the time the back cut remains open and unsupported by compacted fill. 6.7 Geochemical Considerations Geochemical screening of the onsite soils was performed. The screening is meant to serve as an indicator for the design professionals in determining the level of input necessary from a qualified corrosion engineer. Review of geochemical test results by a corrosion engineer is recommended. Concrete in direct contact with soil or water that contains a high concentration of soluble sulfates can be subject to chemical deterioration commonly known as "sulfate attack." Soluble sulfate results (Appendix C) indicated a soluble sulfate content less than 0.1 percent. Uniform Building Code Table 19 -A -4 provides minimum concrete design requirements based on sulfate exposure conditions. 1� -17- _�� 4940028 -029 Minimum resistivity and pH tests were performed on representative samples of subgrade soils (Appendix C). Based on our results, some of the site soils are believed to present a severe potential for acid (pH) attack to concrete. Additional testing should be performed at finish grade to evaluate the soil conditions below the structure. Previous testing on other portions of the Encinitas Town Center have had neutral test results. We recommend further review be performed by a corrosion engineer to provide measures to mitigate corrosion potential. 6.8 Preliminary Pavement Design The appropriate pavement section depends primarily on the type of subgrade soil, shear strength, traffic load, and planned pavement life. Since an evaluation of the characteristics of the actual soils at pavement subgrade cannot be made at this time, we have provided the following range of pavement sections to be used for planning purposes only. The final subgrade characteristics will be highly dependent on the soils present at finish pavement subgrade. We expect that the proposed grading will expose granular soils. For preliminary planning purposes, we have estimated R- Values of 30 to 50 for these materials. Final pavement design should be evaluated based on R -value tests performed upon completion of grading. Provide below are sections for R- Value 30 to 50 subgrade conditions. Pavement Loading Condition Traffic Index (20 -Year Life) Anticipated Pavement Section R- Value =30 R- Value =50 Parking Areas 4.5 3 inches AC over 5 inches Class 2 base 3 incites AC over 4 inches Class 2 base Drive Areas 5.5 3 -1/2 inches AC over 7 inches Class 2 base 3 -1/2 inches AC over 4 inches Class 2 base Truck Driveways 6.5 4 inches AC over 9 inches Class 2 base 4 inches AC over 1 4 inches Class 2 base For concrete pavements and areas subject to heavy truck loading (i.e., trash trucks, moving vans, etc.), we recommend a full depth of Portland Cement Concrete (P.C.C.) section of 7 inches with appropriate steel reinforcement and crack - control joints as designed by the project structural engineer. We recommend that sections be as nearly square as possible. A 3,500 psi mix that produces a 600 psi modulus of rupture should be utilized. All pavement section materials conform to and be placed in accordance with the latest revision of the California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (Caltrans) and American Concrete Institute (ACI) guidelines. The upper 12 inches of subgrade soil and all aggregate base should be compacted to a relative compaction of at least 95 percent (based on ASTM Test Method D1557) for asphalt pavement and 90 percent for concrete pavements. If pavement areas are adjacent to heavily watered landscape areas, we recommend some measure of moisture control be taken to prevent the subgrade soils from becoming saturated. It is -18- _`= 4940028 -029 recommended that the concrete curbing separating the landscaping area from the pavement extend below the aggregate base to help seal the ends of the sections where heavy landscape watering may have access to the aggregate base. 6.9 Construction Observation The recommendations provided in this report are based on preliminary design information and subsurface conditions disclosed by widely spaced excavations. The interpolated subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during construction. Construction observation of all onsite excavations and field density testing of all compacted fill should be performed by a representative of this office. 6.10 Plan Review Final project drawings should be checked by Leighton 4nd Associates before grading to see that the recommendations in this report are incorporated in project plans. Alyt--- 19 -� 4940028 -029 7.0 LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based in part upon data that were obtained from a limited number of observations, site visits, excavations, samples, and tests. Such information is by necessity incomplete. The nature of many sites is such that differing geotechnical or geological conditions can occur within small distances and under varying climatic conditions. Changes in subsurface conditions can and do occur over time. Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report can be relied upon only if Leighton has the opportunity to observe the subsurface conditions during grading and construction of the project, in order to confirm that our preliminary findings are representative for the site. JLK� - -20- APPENDIX A REFERENCES Blake, 1996, EQFAULT, Version 2.2. 1998, FRISKSP, Version 3.01. 4940028 -029 CDMG, 1996, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California, Open -File Report, 96 -08. Hart, 1985, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist - Priolo Special Studies Zones Act of 1972 with Index to Special Study Zone Maps, Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42. International Conference of Building Officials, 1994, Uniform Building Code. International Conference of Building Officials, 1997, Uniform Building Code. Leighton and Associates, Inc, 1994, Geotechnical Investigation, Green Valley Phase 1, Encinitas Town Center, Encinitas, California, Project No. 4940028 -01, dated April 20, 1994. -, 1995a, Geotechnical Update and Geotechnical Investigation, Green Valley, Encinitas Ranch, Encinitas, California, Project No. 4940028 -003, dated June 7, 1995. 1995b, As- Graded Report of Rough Grading, Lots 40 and 43 Encinitas Ranch Phase I, Encinitas, California, Project No. 4940028 -006, dated December 22, 1995. -, 1996a, As- Graded Report of Rough- Grading, Encinitas Town Center Lots 21 Through 33 and Lots 35 Through 37, Encinitas, California, Project No. 4940028 -009, dated February 6, 1996. -, 1996b, Geotechnical Investigation, Encinitas Ranch -Plaza 2, Encinitas Ranch, TM 94 -066, Encinitas, California, Project No. 4940028 -008, dated May 17, 1996. 1996c, Leighton and Associates, Inc., 1996, As- Graded Report of Rough- Grading, Via Cantebria, Lcucadia Boulevard, Garden View Road and Lots 44 and 45, Encinitas Ranch Phase 1, Encinitas, California, Project No. 4940028 -006, dated November 8, 1996. Tan S.S., 1996 and Kennedy, M.P., 1996, Geology of the Northern Portion of San Diego County, California, Geology of the Oceanside, San Luis Rey and San Marcos Quadrangles: California Division of Mines and Geology Open File Report 96 -02. MAPS O'Day Consultants, 1996, Grading Plans for Encinitas Ranch Green Valley Units I and III, 33 Sheets dated August 22, 1996, revised November 1 and November 19, 1995. A -1 EOTECHNICAL BORING LC _ KEY Date Project KEY TO BORING LOG GRAPHICS Drilling Co. Hole Diameter Drive Weight Elevation Top of Hole +/- ft. Ref. or Datum Sheet 1 of 1 Project No. Type of Rig Drop _ in n1y at to tom- Q. " L W a0 CL 9J In W t Z Z d E N O 3 0 O� to d — 0, m f at T D. o L 3t NC O C �U N UU N" GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION IA eel B y g8 Sampled By 0 CL Inorganic clay o( low to medium plasticity, gravelly clay, sandy clay, silty clay, Iwn clay I C11 Inorganic clay of high plasticity, (at clay OL OH Organic clay, silt or silty clay -clayey silt mixtures MI. Inorganic silt; very line Land; silty or clayey fine Land; clayey sill with low plasticity 5 nSPP Sample MH CLML Inorganic silt; diatomaceous fine sandy or silty wits; elastic silt Low plasticity day to silt mixture ndical Cal MI SM Sandy Lilt to silty Land mixture Sample CI-SC Sandy day to clayey Band mixture v to protard SCSM Claycysand to silty Land mixture "ter tine ol level at trop SW Well graded sand; gravelly Land, little or no fines 10 SP Poorly graded sand; gravelly sand, little or no (inns SM Silty Land; poorly graded sandailt mixture Sc Clayey Land; poorly graded Land -clay mixture a ^ GW Well graded gravel; gravel-Land mixture, little or no fines o GP Poorly graded gravel; gravcl-sand mixture, little or no fines 15 GM Silty gravel; gravel- sandsilt mixture GC Clayey gravel; gravetaand -clay mixture Sandstone Sillstone Claystone 20 O ° O d O Bteecia (angular gravel and cobbles or matrix-supported conglomerate) Conglomerate (rounded gravel and cobble, clast -supported) Igneous granitic or granitic type rock ' x _ Metawltanic or metamorphic rock A t` L yyy� y� Artificial or man -made fill 25 Asphaltic conmic Portland Cement Concrete 505~(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES 'OTECHNICAL BORING LC s B -1 Date 3 -30 -00 Project Encinitas Ranch /] Drilling Co. F &C Dril Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight Elevation Top of Hole +/- 205 ft. Ref. or Datum Sheet 1 Project No. Type of Rig See Geotechnical Map of 1 4940028 -029 Hollow -Stem Augerr Drop 30 in. 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES ` O, U a� "� GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION t} t} Lm d Z N O— 3O r' L �t M N . UU >a) Wd °� NJ O Z E O� m W 02 NW —� M o � Lagged By MDJ Sampled By MDJ w to Al a o EU (°n 205 0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) ® 0': Silty fine SAND: light brown, moist, dense (per driller); scattered fine gravel 200 5 1 42 119.0 12.6 @Y: Silty fine SAND: Gray -brown to orange- brown, moist, medium dense 195 10 2 92/ 112.5 11.4 ®10': Silty fine to medium SAND: light brown, moist, very dense; cobble in 10.51 sample may have affected blow counts 190 15 3 87 114.6 12.2 (rD 15': Silty fine to medium SAND: Orange -brown to gray, damp, very dense; trace of clay Total Depth = 17 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling Backfilled: 3130/00 185 20 180 25 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES EOTECHNICAL BORING LL � B -2 Date 3 -30 -00 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop -Min. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 205 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES c O ,� _ U ° Z O ` } "� L "� "N GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION _ r m to d 30 c'f UIU 3t p ' UU NW Q� at 00 t OLL Nc a 0— cL Z E to o T -� Logged By MDJ Sampled By MDJ 41 1J 0 L U N" 205 B Bulk I SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (AD ® I': Silty SAND with gravel: light brown, moist, medium dense; trace of clay 2 52 ® 2.5': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown to gray- brawn, moist, dense 200 5-1 3 58 104.9 14.8 05': Silry f ne SAND: gray -brown, damp, dense; scattered organic material - 4 91/10' 114.1 15.0 07.5': Silty fine SAND: gray -brown, damp, very dense; iron concretions 195 10 5 83/11' 114.1 13.3 ® 10': Silty fine SAND, orange -brown, damp, very dense Total Depth = 12 Feet No gground water encountered at time of drilling BacUiled: 3/30100 190 IS 185 20 180 25 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES • -j.OTECHNICAL BORING L(,,, B -3 Date 3 -30 -00 Sheet I of I Project Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Type of Rig Hollow -Stem AuRerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 205 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES ° 0 "� `; "� "N GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION i. r} n t} _ S0) N 2 in 0 30 C' L 7t N ' m0/ W av d a0 0 — 0LL _ mu �C " cd L7 to ° Z E m a ° c to Logged By MDJ tL EL 3,a sU u' o in Sampled By 11IDJ 205 0— SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) ® 0': Silty SAND with gravel: orange -brown, moist, dense (per driller) ® 3.5': Few clay fragments observed in cuttings 200 5 1 72 ® 5': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown, damp to moist, dense: trace of clay 2 80/11' 108.1 15.1 (D7.5': Silry SAND: orange -brown to gray- brown, mist, very dense 195 10 3 75 110.9 13.7 ®10': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown to gray- brown, moist, dense Total Depth = 12 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling 6ackfdled: 3/30/00 190 IS 185 2D 180 25 1 1754 30 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES Date 3 -30 -00 Proiect t- _,OTECHMCAL BORING LG B -4 Sheet 1 of I Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Dril Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight Elevation Top of Hole +/- 205 fr. Ref. or Datum ng Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr 140 pounds Drop 30 in. See Geotechnical Map 505n01/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES C U GEOTECHMCAL DESCRIPTION t} +} ,C O1 W Z W O 3 O C'� L 3t '�C !n b U rd0 N w� as O o- a0 + zo — OLL ma CU U a a N rL m c —� Logged By MDJ Sampled By MDJ w n oL t° on 205 0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (AO ® 0': Silty fine SAND: light gray, moist, dense (per driller) 1 74 Ct9 2.5': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown to gray, moist, dense; few clay fragments 200 5 2 81 115.3 13.2 ® 5': Silty fine to medium SAND: light brown to orange- brown, damp to moist, very dense " 195 to — 3 80 /11' 116.8 13.8 ®10': Silty fine SAND: light brown, moist, very dense 190 15 4 76 116.6 10.5 ® 15': Silty fine SAND: red brown, moist, dense: few wood fragments Total Depth = 17 Feet No ground water encountered at time or drilling Backfilled: 3/30100 185 20 180 25 505n01/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES � -�;OTECHNICAL BORING LG - B -5 Date 3 -30 -00 Project Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 you Elevation Top of Hole +/- 206 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Sheet 1 of I Project No. 4940028 -029 Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr _ Drop 30 in. C O'-' u z O "� L v "� un GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ♦-} u L� tW -Cm " N w " 30 ",� C' at u 7t ; C ru —' UL! ro N all 0. N o� ao ea-i + z — E _oLL m v a N -o _v? rL Logged By MDJ Sampled By MDJ w to a o sU to 0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (AD 0': Silty fine to coarse SAND: orange - brown, moist, dense (per driller); 205 scattered fine gravel 1 75 ® 2.5': Silty medium to coarse SAND: orange -brown, dense; scattered fine gravel 5 2 72 ® 5': Silty medium SAND: orange -brown, moist, dense 200 3 90 117.4 12.3 ® 7.5': Silty fine SAND: light brown to gray- brown, moist, very dense t0 4 68 109.1 14.3 10': Silty fine to medium SAND: orange -brown, moist, dense 195 Total Depth = 12 Feet No ground water encountered at time or drilling Bacgfilled: 3130100 15 190 20 185 25 180 505A(11177) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES L.OTECHNICAL BORING LO- B -6 Date 3 -30 -00 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 206 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES ` On Z 0 in W Lv "� NN GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION +} rl. t} ,U Z 0) N W N 3 O C't �t — (aW W aW W a0 • W — OLL WU �C N UU wl 0v LJ Zo (1 m w o a of _tn Longed By MDJ W a �U to oL inn? Sampled By MDJ 0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (AD ® 0': Silty fine to medium SAND: orange -brown, moist, dense (per driller) 205 5 1 69 112.4 15.7 05': Silry fine SAND: orange- brown, moist, dense 200 t0 2 60 113.0 15.4 @ 10': Silty fine SAND: light brown to orange- brown, moist, dense 195 IS 3 62 114.4 14.3 ® 15': Silty SAND: light brown to orange- brown, moist, dense; few gravel 190 Total Depth = 17 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling Backfilled: 3130/00 20 185 25 180 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES �-�OTECHNICAL BORING LO_, B -7 Date 3 -30 -00 Proiect Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Drilling Co. F &C Dril Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight Elevation Top of Hole +/- 210 ft. Ref. or Datum Sheet 1 of 1 Project No. 4940028 -029 Type of Rig Hollow -Stem AuR Drop 30 in. See Geotechnical 505A01 /77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES U Z O "� L N� N GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION _o +t W +� -C 07 y 30 C't 3t N ' 43 N w� d ov — a o a N c _u1 �� z° E Co .o Logged By MDJ W to o o fir° (0n Sampled By MDJ 210 0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (A0 0 0': Silly fine SAND: gray- brown, damp, dense (per driller) 205 5 1 65 0 5': Silty medium SAND: red -brown to orange -brown, damp, dense 200 10 2 801 114.1 13.4 0 10': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown to gay, moist, very dense; dense lithic 10.5' fragment SM TERTIARY TORREY SANDSTONE M) a 13': Became more dense (per driller) 195 IS — 3 50/4' 97.9 8.3 0 15': Silly fine SANDSTONE: light brown, damp, moderately dense: moderately indurated 190 20 4 50/3.5' 0 20': Silty fine to medium SANDSTONE: orange- brown, damp, very dense; moderately induntcd Total Depth = 21 Feet No gground water encountcred at time of drilling Backfi(led: 3/30100 185 25 505A01 /77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES l_— OTECHNICAL BORING LO_ B -8 Date 3 -30 -00 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 208 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map O "� N-; GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION .. tl. U r co N N Z v NO 3 0 DU_ Nn C'� at L 3+- ni UU ma a a0 v aD M-i — at a 0(Z N _N w� °- fL z E m a T o EU Logged By MDJ Sampled By MDJ w u C3 (n 0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (Aft ® 0': Silty SAND: light brown to brown, moist, dense (per driller) 205 5 1 84 ® 7.5': Silty fine SAND: light brown to orange -brown, moist, very dense; 200 scattered wood fragments 10 2 86 0 10': Silty very fine to medium SAND: Orange -brown to brown, moist, very dense; few wood fragments, trace of clay 195 IS 3 80 112.9 13.7 ® 15': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown, moist, very dense; iron - seined 190 20 - 4 83/8' _SM _ __T_U TARY TORR __ANDSTONF _T___________________ a 20': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown, moist, very dense Total Depth = 22 Feet 185 No ground water encountered at time of drilling Backfilled: 3/30100 25 Igo 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES Date 3 -30 -00 Project Drilling Co. - t_._ .TECHNICAL BORING LO, B -9 Sheet 1 of I Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 F& C Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight Elevation Top of Hole +/- 205 ft. Ref. or Datum ng Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr 140 pounds Drop 30 in. See Geotechnical Map 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES ° W U `� �� N ' N GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION _ +� _ +'� LIT 7N1 Z O 30 Crr L ;J+ NU at Q. W D_O t W OLL W U O tl C W U >� W„ Qi ❑„ rdJ O z 0. e — L °� W ,N o _ N Logged By MDJ w CD a T zU to a ton Sampled By MDJ 205 -U SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (Ali ® 0': Silty SAND: light brown to brown, mist, dense (per driller): few gravel 200 5 1 73 ® 5': Silty fine SAND: light brown to brown, moist, dense 195 10—. 2 BS /I I' 116.5 14.2 @ 10': Silty fine SAND: light brown, moist, very dense: iron - stained 190 IS 3 73 6 15': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown to red - brown, moist, dense Total Depth = 17 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling Backfilled: 3130/00 185 20 180 25 1751 In 505A(11/77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES 'OTECHNICAL BORING L(.a B -10 Date 3 -30-00 Sheet I of I Project Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Project No. 4940028 -029 Drilling Co. F &C Drilling Type of Rig Hollow -Stem Augerr Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 205 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map C O.. U ° Z 0 + — "x L" "� "Vl GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION tt t} _ L01 N N 30 r' Jt }C N - UU N� W w� 0. d o� a0 + — oLL ma Q1U o a " (D z° m C -j Logged By MDJ Sampled By MDJ w to o U N 205 -0 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) ® 0': Silty SAND: orange -brown to light brown, moist, dense (per driller) 200 5 195 1D I 86 ® 10': Silty fine SAND: orange -brown to light gray-brown, damp to moist, very dense; trace of clay 190 IS 2 72 115.6 14.6 ® 15': Silty fine SAND with clay: light brown to gray- brown, moist, dense 185 20 ItTotal 3 78/11' 119.2 7.9 ®20': Silty fine to medium SAND: gray to red -brown, damp to moist, very dense Depth = 22 Feet No ground water encountered at time of drilling Backfilled: 3130100 180 25 z 505A(11 /77) LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES 4940028 -029 APPENDIX C Laboratory TestingProceduresand Test Results Hydrocollaose: Selected samples were loaded in a consolidometerto selected overburden pressure. The samples were then inundated with water and the percent hydrocollapse was measured and recorded below. A plot of the test data is also included in this Appendix. Sample Location "fotalStrain,% Hydrocollapse,% B -1 @ 5 Feet 2.0 0.5 @ 1,100 psf B -6 @ 5 Feet 1.3 0.2 @ I,100 psf Expansion Index Tests: The expansion potential of selected materials was evaluated by the Expansion Index Test, ASTM D4829. Specimens are molded under a given compactive energy to approximately 50 percent saturation. The prepared 1 -inch thick by 4 -inch diameter specimens are loaded to an equivalent 144 psf surcharge and are inundated with tap water until volumetric equilibrium is reached. The results of these tests are presented in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description Compacted Dry Density(pcf) Expansion Index P ExqLow B- 2 @I' -3' Yellow brown silty sand 112.7 20 V Maximum Density Tests: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical materials were determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method DI 557. The results of these tests are presented in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description Maximum Dry Density (pcf) Optimum Moisture Content (%) B -2, P— 3' Yellow brown silty sand 127.0 10.0 1 C -1 4940028 -029 APPENDIX C (continued) Minimum Resistivity and pH Tests: Minimum resistivity and pH tests were performed in general accordance with California Test Method 643. The results are presented in the table below: Sample Locatiod Sample Description pH Minimum Resistivity (ohms-cm) B2 @ V-3' Yellow brown silty sand 4.52 1 2336 Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate contents of selected samples were determined by standard geochemical methods. The test results are presented in the table below: Sample Location Sulfate Content ( %) Potential Degree of Sulfate Attack* B -2 @ I' -3' 0.04 I Negligible * Based on the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code, Table No. 19 -A -4 Direct Shear Tests: Direct shear tests were performed on selected remolded and /or undisturbed samples which were soaked under a surcharge equal to the applied normal force during testing. After transfer of the sample to the shear box, and reloading the sample, pore pressures set up in the sample due to the transfer were allowed to dissipate prior to application of shearing force. The samples were tested under various normal loads, a motor - driven, stain- controlled,direct -shear testing apparatus at a strain rate of 0.001 to 0.01 inches per minute. The test results are presented below. C -2 Apparent Sample Location Sample Description Friction Angle (degrees) Cohesion(psf) B -2 @ 1' Yellow brown silty sand 33 100 (remolded to 90 %) C -2 U 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 •10 -11 VERTICAL STRESS (kst) Test Method : ASTM D2435 -90 Boring No. B -1 Sample No. 1 Depth (feet) 5.0 Soil Type SM Before Adding Water • After Adding Water Dry Density (pcf) 119.0 Moisture Content (%): Before 12.6 After 16.1 Type of Sample Undisturbed CONSOLIDATION - PRESSURE CURVE - Project No. 4940028 -029 Project Name Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 I ll c l Date 4/17/00 Figure No. I II ICI IIIIIIJJLLJJII i i i i i i VERTICAL STRESS (ksfl Test Method : ASTM D2435 -90 Boring No. B -6 Sample No. 1 Depth (feet) 5.0 Soil Type SM 0 Before Adding Water A& After Adding Water Dry Density (pcf) 112.4 Moisture Content ( %): Before 15.7 After 19.8 Type of Sample Undisturbed CONSOLIDATION - PRESSURE CURVE - Project No. 4940028 -029 Project Name Encinitas Ranch /Lot 45 Date 4/17/00 Figure No. 2 lul IIIILLJJLLJJII Leighton and Assoc iates,._c. GENERAL EARTH WORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Pagel of G LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROUGH GRADING 1.0 General 1.1 Intent These General Earthwork and Grading Specifications are for the grading and earthwork shown on the approved grading plan(s) and/or indicated in the geotechnical report(s). These Specifications are a part of the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report(s). In case of conflict, the specific recommendations in the geotechnical report shall supersede these more general Specifications. Observations of the earthwork by the project Geotechnical Consultant during the course of grading may result in new or revised recommendations that could supersede these specifications or the recommendations in the geotechnical report(s). 1.2 The Geotechnical Consultant of Record: Prior to commencement of work, the owner shall employ the Geotechnical Consultant of Record (Geotechnical Consultant). The Geotechnical Consultants shall be responsible for reviewing the approved geotechnical report(s) and accepting the adequacy of the preliminary geotechnical findings, conclusions, and recommendations prior to the commencementof the grading. Prior to commencement of grading, the Geotechnical Consultant shall review the "work plan" prepared by the Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) and schedule sufficient personnel to perform the appropriate level of observation, mapping, and compaction testing. During the grading and earthwork operations, the Geotechnical Consultant shall observe, map, and document the subsurface exposures to verify the geotechnical design assumptions. If the observed conditions are found to be significantly different than the interpreted assumptions during the design phase, the Geotechnical Consultant shall inform the owner, recommend appropriate changes in design to accommodate the observed conditions, and notify the review agency where required. Subsurface areas to be geotechn ical ly observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested include natural ground after it has been cleared for receiving fill but before fill is placed, bottoms of all "remedial removal" areas, all key bottoms, and benches made on sloping ground to receive fill. The Geotechnical Consultant shall observe the moisture- conditioningand processing of the subgrade and fill materials and perform relative compaction testing of fill to determine the attained level of compaction. The Geotechnical Consultant shall provide the test results to the owner and the Contractor on a routine and frequent basis. roro 1094 Leighton and Associates, wc. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 2 of G 1.3 The Earthwork Contractor. The Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) shall be qualified, -experienced, and knowledgeable in earthwork logistics, preparation and processing of ground to receive fill, moisture -conditioning and processing of fill, and compacting fill. The Contractor shall review and accept the plans, geotechnical report(s), and these Specifications prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for performing the grading in accordance with the plans and specifications. The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant a work plan that indicates the sequence of earthwork grading, the number of "spreads" of work and the estimated quantities of daily earthwork contemplated for the site prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall inform the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant of changes in work schedules and updates to the work plan at least 24 hours in advance of such changes so that appropriate observations and tests can be planned and accomplished. The Contractor shall not assume that the Geotechnical Consultant is aware of all grading operations. The Contractor shall have the sole responsibility to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with the applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, these Specifications, and the recommendations in the approved geotechnical report(s) and grading plan(s). If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Consultant, unsatisfactoryconditions, such as unsuitable soil, improper moisture condition, inadequate compaction, insufficient buttress key size, adverse weather, etc., are resulting in a quality of work less than required in these specifications, the Geotechnical Consultant shall reject the work and may recommend to the owner that construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified. 2.0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled 2.1 Clearing and Grubbier Vegetation, such as brush, grass, roots, and other deleterious material shall be sufficiently removed and properly disposed of in a method acceptable to the owner, governing agencies, and the Geotechnical Consultant. The Geotechnical Consultant shall evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions. Earth fill material shall not contain more than I percent of organic materials (by volume). No fill lift shall contain more than 5 percent of organic matter. Nesting of the organic materials shall not be allowed. If potentially hazardous materials are encountered, the Contractor shall stop work in the affected area, and a hazardous material specialist shaII be informed immediately for proper evaluation and hand ing of these materials prior to continuing to work in that area. As presently defined by the State of California, most refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fuel, motor oil, grease, coolant, etc.) have chemical constituents that are considered to be hazardous waste. As such, the indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these fluids onto the ground may constitute a misdemeanor, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and shall not be allowed. 3030 1 s4 Leighton and Associates, one. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 3 of 6 2.2 Processing Existing ground that has been declared satisfactory for support of fill by the Geotechnical Consultant shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Existing ground that is not satisfactory sha I I be overexcavatedas specified in the following section. Scarification shall continue until soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or clods and the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven features that would inhibit uniform compaction. 2.3 Overexcavation In addition to removals and overexcavations recommended in the approved geotechnical report(s) and the grading plan, soft, loose, dry, saturated, spongy, organic -rich, highly fractured or otherwise unsuitable ground shall be overexcavated to competent ground as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. 2.4 Benching Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical units), the ground shall be stepped or benched. Please see the Standard Details for a graphic illustration. The lowest bench or key shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide and at least 2 feet deep, into competent material as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant. Other benches shall be excavated a minimum height of 4 feet into competent material or as otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. Fill placed on ground sloping flatter than 5:1 shall also be benched or otherwise overexcavated to provide a flat subgrade for the fill. 2.5 Eva luation/Acceptance of Fill Areas: All areas to receive fill, including removal and processed areas, key bottoms, and benches, shall be observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested prior to being accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant as suitable to receive fill. The Contractor shall obtain a written acceptance from the Geotechnical Consultant prior to fill placement. A licensed surveyor shall provide the survey control for determining elevations of processed areas, keys, and benches. 3.0 Fill Material 3.1 General Material to be used as fill shall be essentially free of organic matter and other deleterious substances evaluated and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement. Soils of poor quality, such as those with unacceptable gradation, high expansion potential, or low strength shall be placed in areas acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant or mixed with other soils to achieve satisfactory fill material. 3.2 Oversize: Oversize material defined as rock, or other irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 8 incites, shall not be buried or placed in fill unless location, materials,and placement methods are specificallyaccepted by the Geotechnical Consultant. Placement operations shall be such that nesting of oversized material does not occur and such that oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densified fill. Oversize material shall not be placed within 10 vertical feet of finish grade or within 2 feet of future utilities or underground construction. 3.3 Import If importing of fill material is required for grading, proposed import material shal I meet the requirements of Section 3.1. The potential import source shall be given to the 30101D 1 Lughtonand Associates,,. ic. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 4 of 6 Geotechnical Consultant at least 48 hours (2 working days) before importing begins so that its suitabilitycan be determinedand appropriate tests performed. 4.0 Fill Placement and Compaction 4.1 Fill Layers: Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill (per Section 3.0) in near- horizontal layers not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness. The Geotechnical Consultant may accept thicker layers if testing indicates the grading procedures can adequately compact the thicker layers. Each laver shall be spread evenly and mixed thoroughlyto attain relative uniformity of material and moisture throughout. 4.2 Fill Moisture Conditionine Fill soils shall be watered, dried back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Maximum density and optimum soil moisture content tests shall be performed in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM Test Method D1557-91). 4.3 Compaction of Fill: After each layer has been moisturo-conditioned, mixed, and evenly spread, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM Test Method D 1557-9 1). Compaction equipment shall be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified level of compaction with uniformity. 4.4 Compaction of Fill Slows In addition to normal compaction procedures specified above, compaction of slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet in fill elevation, or by other methods producing satisfactory results acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant. Upon completion of grading, relative compaction of the fill, out to the slope face, shall be at least 90 percent of maximum density per ASTM Test Method D1557-91. 4.5 Compaction Testing Field tests for moisture content and relative compaction of the fill soils shall be performed by the Geotechnical Consultant. Location and frequency of tests shall be at the Consultant's discretion based on field conditions encountered. Compaction test locations will not necessarily be selected on a random basis. Test locations shall be selected to verify adequacy of compaction levels in areas that are judged to be prone to inadequate compaction (such as close to slope faces and at the fill/bedrock benches). 4.6 Frequencyof Compaction Test int: Tests shall be taken at intervals not exceeding2 feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill soils embankment. In addition, as a guideline, at least one test shall be taken on slope faces for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each 10 feet of vertical height of slope. The Contractor shall assure that fill construction is such that the testing schedule can be accomplished by the Geotechnical Consultant. The Contractor shall stop or slow down the earthwork construction if these minimum standards are not met. 1010 wv4 Leighton and Asso iatc�..ec. GENERAL EARTH WORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 5 of G 4.7 Compaction Test Locations The Geotechnical Consultant shall document the approximate elevation and horizontal coordinates of each test location. The Contractor shall coordinate with the project surveyor to assure that sufficient grade stakes are established so that the Geotechnical Consultant can determine the test locations with sufficient accuracy. At a minimum, two grade stakes within a horizontal distance of 100 feet and vertically less than 5 feet apart from potential test locations shall be provided. 5.0 Subdrain Installation Subdrain systems shall be installed in accordance with the approved geotechnical report(s), the grading plan, and the Standard Details. The Geotechnical Consultant may recommend additional subdrains and/or changes in subdrain extent, location, grade, or material depending on conditions encountered during grading. All subdrains shall be surveyed by a land surveyor /civil engineer for line and grade after installation and prior to burial. Sufficient time should be allowed by the Contractor for these surveys. 6.0 Excavation Excavations, as well as over-excavation for remedial purposes, shall be evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. Remedial removal depths shown on geotechnical plans are estimates only. The actual extent of removal shall be determined by the Geotechnical Consultant based on the field evaluation of exposed conditions during grading. Where fill-over-cut slopes are to be graded, the cut portion of the slope shall be made, evaluated, and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of materials for construction of the fill portion of the slope, unless otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. 7.0 Trench Backfills 7.1 The Contractor shall follow all OHSA and CaUOSHA requirements for safety of trench excavations. 7.2 All bedding and backfill of utility trenches shall be done in accordance with the applicable provisions of Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction. Bedding material shall have a Sand Equivalent greater than 30 (SE>30). The bedding shall be placed to 1 foot over the top of the conduit and densified by jetting. Backfill shall be placed and densified to a minimum of 90 percentof maximum from I foot above the top oftheconduit to the surface. 7.3 The jetting of the bedding around the conduits shall be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant. 7.4 The Geotechnical Consultant shall test the trench backfill for relative compaction. At least one test should be made for every 300 feet of trench and 2 feet of fill. 3010 Ica Leighton and Associates, Inc. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Page 6 of 6 7.5 Lift thickness of trench backfill shall _not exceed those allowed in the. Standard -Specifications of Public Works Construction unless the Contractor can demonstrate to the Geotechnical Consultant that the fill lift can be compacted to the minimum relative compaction by his alternative equipment and method. )mo 1094 KEY 1'+ DEPTH 15' MIN. OUTLET PIPES — - -_ 4'¢ NON- PERFORATED PIPE, 100' MAX. O.C. HORIZONTALLY, - -- BACKCUT 1:1 30' MAX. O.C. VERTICALLY =_____ -- _ — OR FLATTER —_— - -== -�2 %__= BENCHING ---- -ft_� -- _-- - -___- - =2 %MIN = —r- 2' MIN. 15' MIN. �— KEY WIDTH 412' MIN. OVERLAP FROM THE TOP POSITIVE SEA SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE JOINT 5% M L fHOG RING TIED EVERY 6 FEET FILTER FABRIC • (MIRAFI 140 OR ,• .• APPROVED IH.-- EQUIVALENT) OUTLET PIPE - (NON -PERFORATED)______..�� \ T-CONNECTION FOR CALTRANS CLASS II COLLECTOR PIPE TO PERMEABLE OR #2 ROCK OUTLET PIPE (3FT.3/FT.) WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION - Subdrain collector pipe shall be Installed with perforations down or, unless otherwise designated by the geotechnical consultant Outlet pipes shall be non - perforated pipe. The subdrain pipe shall have at least 8 perforatiom uniformly spaced per toot. Perforation shall be '/; to '/a' If drilled holes are used. All subdrain pipes shall have a gradient at least 2% towards the outlet • SUBDRAIN PIPE - Subdrain pipe shall be ASTM D2751, SDR 23.5 or ASTM 01527, Schedule 40, or ASTM D3034, SDR 23.5, Schedule 40 Polyvinyl Chloride Plastic (PVC) pipe. All outlet pipe shall be placed in a trench no wider than twice the subdrain pipe. Pipe shall be in soil of SE >30 jetted or flooded in place except for the outside 5 feet which shall be native soil backfill. BUTTRESS OR REPLACEMENT FILL SUBDRAINS GENERAL EARTHWORK AND SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS GRADING 7 �LJLJ 4195 >r NATURAL -- 3- �_ - --� GROUND ?1— -'2% MIN. -.-I / 7S MIN. -+y LOWESTBENCH 2' MIN. KEY DEPTH 'Roo RIO •o - - l.zL•._-1• S=�k •e •• .• PROJECTED PLANE 1 TO 1 MAIOMUM FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO APPROVED GROUND 2' MIN. - KEY DEPTH OVERBUILT AND TRIM BACK\ DESIGN SLOPE 15' wr - LOWEST BENCH KEYING AND BENCHING f FILL- OVER -CUT r-FSLOPE REMOVE MATERIAL CUT FACE TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT � NATURAL / GROUND REMOVE =Tiin� MATERIAL 4- TYPICAL CUT -OVER -FILL SLOPE For Subdrains See Standard Detail C HEIGHT BENCHING SHALL BE DONE WHEN SLOPES ANGLE IS EOLIAL TO OR GREATER THAN 5:1 WNAUM BENCH HEK3HT SHALL BE 4 FEET MINIMUM FILL WK)TH SHALL BE B FEET GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING [PT SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS A REV. 4111198 = COMPACTED -. PROJECTED PLANE _ -- -- = -F1L1 -- y - - - -- — — —_ 1 TO 1 MAXA&M FROM TOE __ _ — — FILL SLOPE OF SLOPE TO APPROVED GROUND - -- -- REMOVE = �± -_ �— _ _ = 41 � UNSUITABLE NATURAL MATERIAL GROUND - -- BENCH BENCH HEIGHT I j -15' MIN. -� 2' MIN. LOWEST BENCH KEY DEPTH (KEY) >r NATURAL -- 3- �_ - --� GROUND ?1— -'2% MIN. -.-I / 7S MIN. -+y LOWESTBENCH 2' MIN. KEY DEPTH 'Roo RIO •o - - l.zL•._-1• S=�k •e •• .• PROJECTED PLANE 1 TO 1 MAIOMUM FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO APPROVED GROUND 2' MIN. - KEY DEPTH OVERBUILT AND TRIM BACK\ DESIGN SLOPE 15' wr - LOWEST BENCH KEYING AND BENCHING f FILL- OVER -CUT r-FSLOPE REMOVE MATERIAL CUT FACE TO BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT � NATURAL / GROUND REMOVE =Tiin� MATERIAL 4- TYPICAL CUT -OVER -FILL SLOPE For Subdrains See Standard Detail C HEIGHT BENCHING SHALL BE DONE WHEN SLOPES ANGLE IS EOLIAL TO OR GREATER THAN 5:1 WNAUM BENCH HEK3HT SHALL BE 4 FEET MINIMUM FILL WK)TH SHALL BE B FEET GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING [PT SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAILS A REV. 4111198 FINISH GRADE ---- -- -------------------- ----- - -------------------- -------------------- - NATURAL GROUND — — -- COMPACTED FILL - - -__ BENCHING -- --------------------- ----- _— —_V -- --- _ _ -- _ —_ -- --- - - - - -- - -- 5 0 REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL \ 12' MIN. OVERLAP FROM THE TOP HOG RING TIED EVERY 6 FEET CALTRANS CLASS II ° PERMEABLE OR #2 ROCK (9FT.3/FT.) WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI ED OR APPROVED �COLLECTOR PIPE SHALL AP EQUIVALENT) BE MINIMUM 6• DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PVC PERFORATED CANYON SUBDRAIN OUTLET DETAIL PIPE. SEE STANDARD DETAIL D PERFORATED PIPE FOR PIPE SPECIFICATION 6'* MIN. DESIGN } FINISHED GRADE 10' MIN. BACKFILL FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 140 OR 2% . • a . APPROVED •° ° EQUIVALENT) rN20'MIN.O N- PERFORATED 5' MIN. #2 ROCK WRAPPED IN FILTER 6'e� MIN. FABRIC OR CALTRANS CLASS II PERMEABLE. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING CANYON SUBDRAINS SPECIFICATIONS G STANDARD DETAILS C 4195 RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL RETAINING WALL - WALL- WATERPROOFING PER ARCHITECT'S SPECIFICATIONS—. FINISH GRADE -- COMPACTED FIL z WALL FOOTING LLD NOT TO SCALE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL U.S. Standard Sieve Size % Passing 1" 100 3/4" 90 -100 3/8" 40 -100 No. 4 25 -40 No. 8 18 -33 No. 30 5 -15 No. 50 0 -7 No. 200 0 -3 Sand Equivalent >75 SOIL BACKFILL, COMPACTED TO 90 PERCENT RELATIVE COMPACTION* p O� �__= FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE OVERRLAP LAP I ____ - (MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED 0 o 0 , ___- __� EQUIVALENT) ° = = =' 3/4'- 1 -1/2' CLEAN GRAVEL ** 1 MIN. =_ =_ 4'(MIN.S DIAMETER PERFORATED • O -- -PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR • _- EQUIVALENT) WITH PERFORATIONS • ° •, _ -- ORIENTED:DOWN AS DEPICTED I MINIMUM 1 PERCENT GRADIENT ° }, ? TO SUITABLE OUTLET 1 3" MIN. COMPEYENT BEDROCK OR MATERIAL AS EVALUATED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT *BASED ON ASTM D1557 **IF CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL (SEE GRADATION TO LEFT) IS USED IN PLACE OF 3/4'- 1-1/2' GRAVEL, FILTER FABRIC MAY BE DELETED. CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL SHOULD BE COMPACTED TO 90 PERCENf,RELATIVE COMPACTION* NOTE:COMPOSITE DRAINAGE PRODUCTS SUCH AS MIRADRAIN OR J —DRAIN MAY BE USED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO GRAVEL OR CLASS 2. INSTALLATION SHOULD BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANC WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. KEY EP TH, MIN. STABILITY FILL / BUTTRESS DETAIL OUTLET PIPES -4' 0 NONPERFORATED PIPE, 100' MAX. O.C. HORIZONTALLY, 30' MAX. O.C. VERTICALLY-, -BACK CUT 1:1 OR FLATTER -BENCH SEE SUBDRAIN TRENCH, DETAIL LOWEST SUBDRAIN SHOULD BE SITUATED AS LOW AS POSSIBLE TO ALLOW SUITABLE OUTLET -2 MIN,= �_ = PERFORATED E 10' MIN. .I EACH SIDE -___ - -- -- PIPE CAP NON - PERFORATED OUTLET PIPE KEY WIDTH S NOTED ON GRADING PLANS 15' MIN. SEE T- CONNECTION 6' MIN. DETAIL OVERLAP' �. 3/4'- 1 -1/2' CLEAN GRAVEL (3ft3 /ft. MIN.)_ a' Q! NON — PERFORATED PIPE1 ` FILTER FABRIC J ENVELOPE (MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)* 6' MIN. COVER . l 4' 0 PERFORATED PIPE 5 N. 4' MIN, BEDDING UBDRAIN TRENCH DETAIL — CONNECTION DETAIL * IF CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL IS USED IN PLACE OF 3/4'- 1 -1/2' GRAVEL, FILTER FABRIC MAY BE DELETED S FOR CALTRANS ABLE MATERIAL F % Passin 100 3/4" 90 -100 3/8" 40 -100 No. 4 25 -40 No. 8 18 -33 No. 30 5 -15 No. 50 0 -7 No. 200 0 -3 Sand Equivalent >75 NOTES: For buttress dimensions, see geotechnlcal report /plans. Actual dimensions of buttress and sub,drain may be changed by the geotechnlcal consultant based on field conditions. SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION - Subdrain pipe should be Installed with perforations down as depicted. At locations recommended by the geotechnlcal, consultant, nonperforated pipe should be installed SUBDRAIN TYPE- Subdreln type should be Acrylon trlle Butadlene Styrene (A.B.S.), Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) or approved equivalent. Class 125,SDR 32.5 should be used for maximum fill depths of 35 feet. Class 200,SDR 21 should be used for maximum fill depths of 100 feet. 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - ClienVAgency Copy ' I • • -' Day: ClientiContractor: • 1 . '� S-Upt]Foreman • • L Weather: � /I / Field lirV—Isar: Soil Engineer: Observatioriffesting of: Equipment Working: G TirveI 10clidtili ®�--� Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Operations: Summary of I .VI r i �.1 �� I < . r • . -1 r /.. to 1 � •_�.i /I «. / ii. ../ Iii./ r J// �/. A 111MA �—.../ M AN M111MMMM#j1A0 I ' LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, DAILY Page of 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - ClienVAgency Copy White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy 3910 1098 Project No.: Date. 2 1 Report No. Location: 4 e)-0 2 -O Go Author: Day: U' r� SQ ;t S M r Cj T F S S Client/Contractor: r Supt/Foreman: Weather: Field S upervisor: � t Geologist: Soil Engineer: Observatlo- /Testing of Tech Equipment Working: TM I Sr ree A t� 2 v��.0 -1:r.� dtvw� Rclkrs. Hours l f Today's Yardage: I RTR e -I I S - �P 01 L. Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: n 15 o t�Zj 14 O sf ' C c 7 0 I KM Page _of LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Recel ed e \ v` DAILY FIELD REPORT Print 70 I`A�°�r White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy 3910 1098 2 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow- Client Copy ' Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy Project® � L� fA r .. O Cornte •. Weather, / •_... Observationrlesting of: .L Equipment Working: I&I.Je Today's Yardage Date: Summary of .. P •.. _.� • .rte. /i.w •; i l .• I //I Page _of LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Recmyed BY: C. 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow- Client Copy ' Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy IN 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy • .. r .: MTWT(DSS WieldSupe SuptlForeman: Weather: is r.. ObservationfTesting . ®--- ®--- r r! / • , / LEIGHTON 1 DAILY FIELD REPORT : L, I Print y I 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy rol W Project Nype: , LG� A W. Project Na- 6 32 Dat Report No. Location: Author : Day: M T W© F S S Client/Contractor Of- SupUFOreman >M. Weather: 6� Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: Observa[ionR tin of: 1 7 Tech Equipment Working: /a16- 13/Ad �i 21-o V1 yo�i�.j Hours %o Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: IV L S lst�� IF l - d r IL � OF Page _of M- LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Re ei ad try: Print( White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy -c_ Leighton and Associates A GTG Company G E O T E C H N I C A L C O N S U L T A N T S FOOTING OBSERVATION SUMMARY Project Name: Date: iruin lS o 2 Location: „y ; V; rx s . J . A Project No.: 94 Gt2.2 8 3 7 Plan File No.: Permit No.: Unit/Phase/Lot(s): Referenced Geotechnical Report(s): Observation Summary 7/v% S Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed onsite soil 1-1� Date conditions. Soil conditions at the site are substantially in conformance with those assumed in the geotechnical report. Sr�.�__Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed and measured '5- i 5 Date footing excavation depth/width. Footing excavations extend to proper depth and bearing strata and are in general conformance with recommendations of the geotechnical report. T m S Initials '3-IS Date TM S Initials U 'S1Date O Notes to Superint�11.. ,,,,, wl cn1ai A representative of Leighton and Associates measured footing setback from slope face. 'ne setback was in general accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. I. Footing excavations should be cleaned of loose debris and thoroughly moistened just prior to placing concrete. 2. Based on expansion potential of underlying soils, presoaking of soil below slabs may be recommended. Consult the geotechnical report for presoaking recommendations. We note that clayey soils may take an extended period of time and the contractor should schedule accordingly. 3. In the event of a site change subsequent to our footing observation and prior to concrete placement (i.e., heavy rain, etc.), we should be contacted to perform additional site observations. Notes to Building Inspector 1. Soil compaction test results, including depth of fill, relative compaction, bearing values, and soil expansion index test results are contained in the As- Graded Geotechnical Report provided at the completion of grading. ctC b0 /')a r 1S -1(')0?, senative of Leighton and Associates, Inc. Date 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, NB205, San Diego, CA 92123 -4425 (858) 292 -8030 • (800) 447 -2626 • FAX (858) 292 -0771 www.leightongeo.com 3 ti X +Is -oz 'CiMIMM, Project No.: Author: �_ J! A Day: a SS Clklent/ContraZto- : . : Field Supea� Soil Engineer: Observatiomr.resting of- T Today's Yardage: Yardage ... Operations: Summary of .., _ ..... MIN M140 I �1/i...u' DAILY FIELD REPORT I/ P(I'nt 3910 1098 White — File Copy Yellow — Client Copy Pink — Field Copy Gold — ClienVAgency Copy ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC 4365 Executive Drive, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92121 Telephone (858) 458 -9700 • Facsimile (858) 452 -3600 December 12, 2001 Ron Quigg City of Encinitas Engineering Inspector 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Grading Permit No. 6538GI Dear Ron: The work under grading permit 6538GI has been completed and we request that the security deposit totaling $450,017.00 be reduced by 75 %. Currently, there is American Motorists Bond No. 3SM 986 068 00, and City National Bank Letter of Credit No. 001206.OD.1400 in place as security. We realize that usually you give a cross the board reduction (75% bond and 75% Letter of Credit), but it would help us out greatly if you could cancel the letter of credit, and reduce the bond to $112,504.25. This would keep the required 25% of the total security for the one year warranty period. Thank you for your assistance with this. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (858) 458 -9700, extension 120 if you have any questions or require any additional information. Sincerely, ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC Robson, Agent Jim Knowlton Greg Shields Debbie Geishart Mi Project Name: Pro ct No.: Date: Report No. Location: Author 'Se Day; M T W T (Z) S S Client/Contractor: CnrVrrt0nC Field Supervisor: Supt/Foreman: Geologist: Weath r: Soil Engineer: Observation/Testing of: P Tech Equipment Working: I " +e, Truck R�11 dozer l��l Hours Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: JV "—k1 P Page _of _- LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Received C/ CL4- Print 3910 1098 White —File Copy Yellow— Client Copy Pink —Field Copy Gold — Client/Agency Copy i 11 a� QUc� �� = Leighton and Associates MANS A GTG Company G E O T E C H N I C A L CONSULTANTS FOOTING OBSERVATION SUMMARY Project Name: /;,a ,�� i« '&� Date: *la,, /5 o 2 Location: &J,,ry; ew V, a _ 1 _ k (A Project No.: 9y Gb 2 82 03 Plan File No.: Permit No.: Unit/Phase/Lot(s): Referenced Geotechnical Report(s): Observation Summary 7,0 S Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed onsite soil 'S— I Date conditions. Soil conditions at the site are substantially in conformance with those assumed in the geotechnical report. ? j Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed and measured Date footing excavation depth/width. Footing excavations extend to proper depth and bearing strata and are in general conformance with recommendations of the geotechnical report. r S Initials 3 -IS Date TM s Initials (� 5-11 Date RE Notes to Superint�,, .., , �,,,a„ A representative of Leighton and Associates measured footing setback from slope face. The setback was in general accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. I. Footing excavations should be cleaned of loose debris and thoroughly moistened just prior to placing concrete. 2. Based on expansion potential of underlying soils, presoaking of soil below slabs may be recommended. Consult the geotechnical report for presoaking recommendations. We note that clayey soils may take an extended period of time and the contractor should schedule accordingly. 3. In the event of a site change subsequent to our footing observation and prior to concrete placement (i.e., heavy rain, etc.), we should be contacted to perform additional site observations. Notes to Building Inspector 1. Soil compaction test results, including depth of 611, relative compaction, bearing values, and soil expansion index test results are contained in the As- Graded Geotechnical Report provided at the completion of grading. r uJt_Co ,}�{Srt?senative of Leighton and Associates, Inc. Date �/ 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, #8205, San Diego, CA 92123.4425 (858) 292 -8030 • (800) 447 -2626 • FAX (858) 292 -0771 www.leighlongeo.com 03/20/02 10:40 0909 693 3320 03/20/2002 11:09 8585600/142 SB&0 W003/003 ACE 02 s._ - -� -i. - fA ki , i � -✓rte � t � �Lty. ..• , � �{ � �` t 1 I I L .'�T i' zRip Ilk ../ �_ _ r I• i. :g yr �� I I I ..:...' . y r Y iLVtlr � ��'fm i n rSE �oa K ,.�j a G� dvo &/ /44WAQO FAGS FOR EUCr LC \ \� y• I 3 -/5- w� Y I .� 4 s � ;, � • ,, 6r�°�prA1A 44 12 GRAND %Ja'S� S a`FA. . 204.7. rMG no L V: S.a \ COAWECr m. nrC SEE PLCpl6VM6 �P A ryp t_ 41 ,8 R vrl'. SQ AT ?.Or A J - . u111 JJ r- i C, gpUNy err +:i mf �.. n. • Sa t � 5..:. _. 3 -/s -off l�a�e o� !.S r `t ref U)Q /I fenaI �� I a Q s s-�� ro °S tka !6c7 *in:4 wwll Lor-I 05 El. /;)-)k fa E oy•s Inc h �o 7�1 ree.c H pea;µ I� U 1 ,(st o3.aS F �- o`i�a, Project Name: o Project No.: OC�Z 8 a Dell: O Report No. ocahon: `/ ✓ 4.41-),117-4-5 Author: Ei? D M T W T(S S S Iient/Contractor Supt/Fore an: Weather: 09-C, v c7 Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: ObservatlonlTesting of: Z Tech Equipment Working: Hours 6.0 Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: ps : AC7 L 04"',7 AQ,�i / 70AVf /nN-r - 1. 24 ! 2 , AL 's rvtF ryA G r+ '— LS Z L -4'- r LQ1JM-T--12C0 12vCLCL iN E 2 i i �), ,f Ft Q D "4(x i L• �A t O �GA-rT '14 - I�� q / e s 1 L O 5 a w-, v Page _of LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Rec iv BY: / Prin G 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy Project Na Kelly WAMM Field S�pm�isor' -.r . . Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: ,pop W!1111,1111F��"f MEN M . / ! .� ...� . �. c WN /.I J. r r .. .• . M ./1 ME •'d c / _ LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Lo 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy 3910 1098 White —File Copy Yellow — Client Copy Pink —Field Copy Gold — Client/Agency Copy /.k Day: Field s-upa"isor: . _ 7— • 1W W, ��-- Date- Summary Operations: / .a• .. // �_ � / -.ice .i/ ,/ 1 _ - - - _ _/ s LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT t I Print 3910 1098 White —File Copy Yellow — Client Copy Pink —Field Copy Gold — Client/Agency Copy /.k ti Pror t Name: aA kso P is Project No.: ?YFIp28.0SZ Date: 12 1 0/ Report No. Location: fc, A. is Author: a44zm Day: M T �(T F S S Client/Contractor: OlAe".> SupUFO eman: 0A T Nl M a<,< L vPaGd✓,Q Wea er: Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: Observationlfesting of: - ! v ,(),e G V 7Pe Tech Equipment Working: - Y!6 ✓4r �+Ol'In� yy Af�CPr �Vr7 IiGC CN.X' �JOC c Hours Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: Pi'te n /n 9 �/ o C/ / / 4 ✓o cl n j n J (/P/ o rrfPrf On /Ion /LIP 1/n q,lj �P T� F� Ur lr B(/ ✓n r 4 f, x ro 6QC4r /l // • � uG r SPA b Ce2 -110 91vesy Irla 1,1 -� „relrlttvc ✓C ♦/ G C/! n S r ' -/af %S /q/Li /'� O// (!rS /P Oi ✓ /Gt Hc/i`~%JfQ P/ lJ ✓ ar..,l }o, ISO / //'N - OYJC. /(rrrQn / //otl /R /S^ P.✓e //IO� Sia /M� /Q //I ✓l/NIG+ (j ✓1 SC�Vy NP4 �� Qo�)SY lF70!'C�F LJr7� (O R N AP l !Y 1/�"' -0 ✓70� 4? 4v Py 0� of �� - /O f�( - /c ✓da P/>7- ZP5�5/ Gv 7 iP`tL/r O✓P✓Sa/r!/ J lJro v/ ""Ve rG0 �/ /Alv� /i I !F �P ✓PV' C/i // /Md �' � /!ra✓ U /7Murh rx /t'tirr (o�d �r >tif, d�{vo(fo/ F 7� P� d <l�dP �o �. f�.� Page _of �_- LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Receive By: fir! Print 3910 1098 White -file Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink -Field Copy Gold - ClienUAgency Copy �o h Q�,� ff 4 „lz� o I Projec Name: �..�` t Apr Project No.: T A $ 031 YI Date: Report No /1 ?0 o/ ' Location : // // 6Nli.tlf7 C4. Author: ,A/�' //// /rl �4 -44V� , Da . M T W F S S ClientfContractor: I C a KN. SupUFor man: Weather: (f / Avpjr Field Supervisor: Geologist: I Soil Engineer: Z O !Z 21 06servationrTesting of: Tech Equipment Working: 84c,�% ,..f(r/ /� / y rJP( /cG�I .�✓/ L LJ 13 Lie L Hours 14.5 1 V, 0 Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: 4rlA -OrfIk Ohsery Ps� bac%g/ OA so✓>i�.rs>� 5rcie- of by .�lrarirr- not leowl hay/ /�v aH �rvvic.ct� M,? 4vq Pd J4r�* W / LXILorC O tC / e ! (Q l4�we t7 4 / /� /n �yfo ove OS C /.1 /o✓ 4-t ✓4 ale, / L7rra f ee y 1 fr Sir 7 E ch U 1221 8/ - 140V- 0r15 rit 74 :> 0LCel- e'C017�" ✓G717.�' l 7/1 lo� /Yr4 /v ae� SO f� q /AP ' V,0.17 Dfi / /// 4S/717 AS 5/,7- 4r-10 �0 SAS lw.4q 4ekleoa! ar Awl 4,1 +,,le, We'e, �I /7 Of 1-e AC 14 // S a Aw - bSf✓ r 44// 0 71i of 114141n A // 4 re V r�rn lr ie Ca U4 le,- 5 z dAacle Gael - A-bephlIA0 2d&JP Page _of _ M& � LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Rec CJt I�� Print 3910 1098 White — File Copy Yellow — Client Copy Pink — Field Copy Gold — Client/Agency Copy Project Name: o,� /re 7yfa Q, t APT P4roject No.: 40029-032 Date: /z Z 7 o / Report No. Location: // i-rfCrn/ S L 4• Author: /�/� / ,,44.0, ///v /`Vei,, Day: M T W F S S ClientlContractor Lor�e[51dvM Supt/Foreman: yrvt Weather: G40vli Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: Ohs ervation/T/ e sting r of f2 f!vc c il f 50 v iA a j o �' 0 Tech ,y' I Equipment Working/ 4e— T �G JAI " /�.� �/ �.-// l/ l,J A C- If C6(k p�crNG u/�c�E Hours A Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: iIM- bs /rve p t /e� *, wa11 back-411 A� ax0 ^ r j-, , Ll ✓o 0. LDA E t T,e.v c/c 0E Pl--4C /,V& R fl f' Q�L =- /�t/ G✓.FG�E,Q OOMP.dC T /N�,- 1-f ,S /�[am... /rrpr R �'/J Air ON ✓TNWd / I(1IINe�,O�C/ t OUIr/1aY, -.w. rewmovr o,7,i (oxi wa e. C/ ,, ✓C) gel r 1t s a 22g ferr I I oc JE2.r avr r,,irrc P„f o,►. C{Ilt / art 1„t Place, 4 +Y�"4 /a� 09 e /O F, /r•r� CJO7 �0/H 7Nln /a /I� rl �l /Q ��.. G(L^ // o� ae b,11, T Si �4f P tvno / = 0 a/- lR/Vt 4 0 Sao /M� /11Q,n 1 beli�A qlaceA ICZAr-PPA n eG�,} iu,ne o I(6,Ole Icu(f^ ('0M 12 a n M14"Iq 'A C0 12 'if 147 0 AI s 0 Spa /rh Jr4,1 �7P,.a �o,ft/ nr%�. c� W[s � � ��aC�C��6 /mot lit r ✓ ✓I %lW^iK X74 <�C !J/ la /,^ Y, // OVPr / t� / / /rt ✓ �/ , I_ /� U WCICIC,�Ir'- rdht �esys fre t / ✓n1 Page _of �&p__ LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Racal ed lC� Print G 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Cliant Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - ClienUAgency Copy 0 0 Project Name: / P rr7�SQ7w d T Project No.: O 2 -032 Date: /1 L8 Ll Report No. Location: /n,�ar CA �ut�hor:l /`i.�- f�1a- .- r ✓��r.� Day: M T W T)( S S Client/Contractor: r�r —[60- 02yForeman : Weather: C�ovo y Field Supervisor: ologist: Soil Engineer: Observation/Test n of: f P , D 5101M /ur,rr Tech /va> -y Equipment orking: Exrq v^'/Yr /�I /C�N O.! G 0,4¢p F2 /V'• C/C r r C rr '�D40P'' Hours p r V.J T7 Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: / �M Oki SI! -C l)s -eYV�rP /� /n f Ifl� IrS' {� /4'i! MO%h, 4/ Ito f7r" 601P /, iJ1// 1p/4/PC/ )^ SO(x?4e4N/ !O/n/r O'l 9r�ln �0'/", Ev19V4 /o/ / COA0ie 7CfK/tiJ(- 444TFK(,iV (Dn+ i/fi es /s ,4. eoVra1 sTaot m agrN 7ZsP"C( -1 /j K/ /1 Z 1 Obse"Od PII O! 1,S-/$ C ,;4 /70r K111 /DCP /,r/! f U N ,frdln Ora (ON-�7nUOS /n We57 607—&eri�c)r /or,.. /1'Ia �C rr4/ Y (Gnr JD/ryhn TL </ ('C1.u.oAl T7orV N//IF L f ACKF .7/ 7 S 7i7 Lr -N U 147 J P C is nn C �,% f v err v� roo�r (,. o��• nor r. ✓r/u1 grP.f. Skr /!� /ODP/ /r MOVrn /hp�r /q j0 / /i✓ (om)Orin OV /rSa /✓raliCrOr/o / / ) U/d // �i rr•q! gnG // // // // W1 /Y1OK r,0 //%r!!r D /r/Y/l.�I7%%% /Jlt,rP iONYH�� P /S 4P" /ri /(VIG 1/ �� / / /4 /I ✓(I 0. O('T7U fir 3� e //QH.r 2 0/ • Page_of_ 4,,-e `I jl/a t, /o /o lv.� Wp�y,,.P)q� ;/-2/0/1, LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Re eiv y:�l�( Print 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy Pro ect Name: o,�se>/44+ lel e 4 t Project No.: ooz8 o3z. Dat / �l d! Report No. Location: / Fe Gini�S c Auth/or: ,,/ AIR4,tyt�u� y� "ay: M T W T S S Client/Contractor: Supt)Foreman: Weather: Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: Obsery tion/Testing of: � .P$1 0/41 , ., /3D S /l Tech NA,41 Equipment Working: �ocke!- 7TO urs Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: nSr1�C JO D�S�r 2 c %o/vYr aye uC�[� /� �or/[/tae to C yn r /1/I t OlN 4f �Y /-n^ lOs+7 �OH G✓�!i / / hff."r %1 q � l� vt� 0 l S /�G, rt e ? % t�4�r�c roi.. ff / O lnCA 4 f ell f / �T�S�S /ar�•o.1 14 e f l W /.�re 2 f e Ow 42 Ol 17ur r5 /� OC/L( / /" 5,401it.. �rp /•, ✓r• -rGGr !Om orf /n W /YLr GdGC /�- olC.<v M ee Ad -hr lA/ le I, q rr ale' 1AV a,N e/ elvt.,h,�Iq / -4r Come /114170 Page _of LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Rec ' Wi Print 76r4c M c 3910 1098 White -File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink -Field Copy Gold - ClienVAgency Copy Project Name: cl .r A / Project No.: ryad2s - 032 Date: Report No. Location: - �f r7/f+fS C4 A thor: /j� - A�^�"' ! 141 ,eryt Day: l0* T W T F S S Cllent/Contractor: Supt/Fore n: Weather: Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer I Observation/Testing of: Tech At .4 AA1 Il/l2Wt Equipment Working: 'roce -/NG [✓'9f/rFS� /✓fe fFr/ ✓F "4" Of Yt Hours Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: v �. F/ (-( �n/A <I1 ,eS 0 -,•< /N�. S,H�c� v �(C r �..1►,�..rr%u1n/6 -e // -f q1 G �e /P1/Q4U^ 0� 1 I .I r� 4a s-k-j ✓Pv.o i S 90/ ye 4-, ve !a e /J1101 - M S/k 06SPrrf Sao /,rw dirol. b0c(eLrflr Q�-( !'ffeh>f /f / bal1e4i/11., q1 '1"413 Mt — 7f4 OoICFI�� /.t l i h,ur 4c k r ,. ) k4g. on . BQ< 40S. ,� /,AfC �LYl1 Ce/ YO6�1M CO-Se f/[ s• Page _of MDAILY LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FIELD REPORT R eiv y:` Pri t 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy Pro ct Name: 44 ,L /cation. Yea I� ��t7 Project No.: 'd3 L Aut : , Kj/I , Date: Report No. - '_ Z Day: M W T F S S C�HgnVContract r: l /Field Supervisor-' S UFors a n: Geologist: Weather: Soil Engineer: l Observation/Tesung of Tech c uipmsnt Working: Hours , Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Opera ons: ^ 1 / _ Z. . n `- Zciki> 0 / /4 O n Jv jcam, i1%.r'1- 4.6 u �j — lc- . v t C o.uS C �/ J 4Z Ix ' Ix • Page _of its LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT R Xe y: G Print�� P 3910 1098 White - Ella Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - ClienVAgeney Copy W C) Project Nan1¢: / Project No Date: Report No. Lcation: i Author: G Day: �n M T l]N T F S S Cllen n tor: Field Supervisor: P Su,pt/Foreman: Weather: c' r / > ` /e I W( Geologist: Soil Engineer: Observation/Testing of: ' ! Tech Equipment orking: fi�.a�p -�, lAf- Hours Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: 1 1 r T N �l• ,�� a� C � C..l i,� 142414 clac ell Page _of LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Reo y: / r may/ Pri t i e7wr C Pc,j i 1910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink -Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy Project Name: � - Location: Project No.: Author: Date: Report No. 'G `L Day: M T V& F S S Cllent/Contractor: _ el' A) SupUForeman: Weather: Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: OhservalionfTestin f: R -4Ie- Tech Equipment orkin Hours . o Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: f- ,k Page _of LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT R Iv By: print 77c—,.-( . G c - 3910 1096 White -File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink -Field Copy Gold - ClienVAgency Copy V2 25 White -File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink -Field Copy Gold- Client/Agency Copy emu.. uI. ' • d _ _ r. .� Field Supervisor: ObservationfTesdip, of ®-- Summary of .. / 11111,1 u 1111,111 .. a._•'LL ._ ... F71 F 70 .t./ _,l M. . is .. is /.•� ./v rM Arm miivoFA. 15 W21 MMMMW�105�11111 R! 11 1 ice: i /u.•..� .. ' •.. I....IM ,.. � a i \ I LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Rec iv c DAILY REPORT • u White -File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink -Field Copy Gold- Client/Agency Copy R.F.I. # // 9 Date _ /J —C'D- Number of pages including cover sheet To: JOHN SUMMO ARCHITECTS ORANGE POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS 1100 Garden View Road Encinitas, CA 92024 From: TOM WLEAN Superintendent Phone (714) 289 -3234 Phone (760) 436 -5732 Fax Phone (714) 288 -6621 Fax Phone (760) 436 -5741 CC: Nextel (619) 954 -6659 ❑ Urgent Information Requested: ❑ For your review ❑ Reply ASAP Jae ; C� (*4 Pee e� ❑ Please comment �e fQ , 4 i 4 lc7a ,• S ytDrc�t ra.ti Q'r av4ls Gta 71- J 4sS ov f S oo frn C-110 - 7he-- e-c� �xffQ esponse. This facsimile transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the address above via the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you. FA 0 Pro act Name: ci�Silri 1z,,oCr£ Project No.: g400Zb -0"37- Date: S 2L Csi Report No. Location: G.hR.p.givV tt U 172 r qp Author: C. Ct/>,&V— Day: M S�ZT S S Client/Contractor: C..'.e. -4-"', —6 Supt/Foreman: Weather: N CC-OJO /sue Field Supervisor: r Geologist: Soil Engineer: to (2 S (./2Q, Observationrresting o(: �� N S Tech Cry c C"C. Equipment Working: F�SF Hours Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: C('25- — O,v Anro 2 F Dort +�U3ES ,0 (-`7 I K+s:-A— (0 CrTC Q L,-5%E Sol LS I -IN otiT�+ o Cs �2o`i,c-s ` /��r try f Tr O $F[C�PEi I0n1 JaL Page _of __ Wit= LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Receive y: Print Al AAA 3910 1098 White —File Copy Yellow — Client Copy Pink —Field Copy Gold — Client/Agency Copy Mu-- A GTG Company Leighton and Associates G E O T E C H N I C A L C O N S U L T A N T S FOOTING OBSERVATION SUMMARY Project Name: Qu,wSeTtiA Date: Co 2�' O Z Location: ( -rAL(> AJVISEW %D CA tiI—S9,a0 Project No.: RYO Z t -G 3 2 whL�s Plan File No.: Permit No.: L� kkon.T)+ oc TiL�Ys I, ti �1 Referenced Geotechnical Report(s): R S `CsRAA-F D Qa: Pu,ct Observation Summary Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed oasite soil Zb a Z Date conditions. Soil conditions at the site are substantially in conformance with those assumed in the geotechnical report. C G Initials A representative of Leighton and Associates observed and measured 63 Date footing excavation depthAvidth. Footing excavations extend to proper depth and bearing strata and are in general conformance with recommendations of the geotechnical report. Cgc Initials Date A representative of Leighton and Associates measured footing setback GZi��Z from slope face. The setback was in general accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. Initials Date Notes to Superintendent/Foreman L Footing excavations should be cleaned of loose debris and thoroughly moistened just prior to placing concrete. 2. Based on expansion potential of underlying soils, presoaking of soil below slabs may be recommended. Consult the geotechnical report for presoaking recommendations. We note that clayey soils may take an extended period of time and the contractor should schedule accordingly. 3. In the event of a site change subsequent to our footing observation and prior to concrete placement (i.e., heavy rain, etc.), we should be contacted to perform additional site observations. Notes to Building Inspector 1. Soil compaction test results, including depth of fill, relative compaction, bearing values, and soil expansion index test results are contained in the As- Graded Geotechnical Report provided at the completion of grading. O _ CAtCt tixl Represenative of Leighton and Associates, Inc. Date 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, 86205, San Diego, CA 92123.4425 (858) 292 -8030 • (800) 447 -2626 - FAX (858) 292 -0771 www.leightongeo.com Carl Schmidt Inspection P. O. Box 178403 San Diego CA 92177 -8403 Phone (619) 855 -9252 PROJECT: ADDRESS: CITY: SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT PERMIT #: 040 - 1 �� J' JOB START: . d JOB STOP: PLAN FILE #: TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS: MASONRY'' REINFORCED CONCRETE_ FIELD WELDING EPDXY PRESTRESSED CONCRETE_ SHOP WELDING_ BOLTING_ REINFORCING STEEL_ FIREPROOFING SAMPLES: NUMBER:_ TYPE: ers/ Materials/Design Mix NumbPSI: ow,v/ Inspection Date: 3 — z7 ^O REPORT BSE 7HE i&il�D� c9D li/ Cti1e T AR-,1F10 /z 6PAIT tL�6G �" L l- S� S /x�E DF PARKl,6 00/� ��&, lrrL, LU//Pk)s /) /'ICGA9A/s�ir� 'IN kv?A dvr_- WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED CihT4 N 4 ,IoNGk7?J,E9 Snf4f- Print Name Certification# Project Billing Information: CORIP'�'QSToy� cotfsiayiri�s �3G.h EX�cur�� nr s�o so yz1z� Phone: (7(4 4L,&6- 5'732 Fax: W) 41ol - 574'J JUL -23 -01 15:21 FROM: CORNERSTONE COMMUNITIES ID 8584S23600 n'CnY NATIONAL BANK REAL ESTATE ORIX7P$AH ( WG0 4275 EWAXIrive SOUARE, Suite 760 La JOLLA. CALIFORNIA 92037 888-842.4072 FAX 858- 842-4986 Way FLOM LFLOMz@CRYHLL. CAM ADMjmL mATNF. zPwIAL14r, OR July 18, 2001 114x. Jack Robson Cornerstone Communities Corporation 4365 Executive Drive, Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92121 Re: Encinitas Ranch Apartments/City of EncinitaslCertificates of Deposit Dear Jack, PACE 2/3 The Certificates of Deposit opened June 16, 2000 as account #027365736 in the amount $ 751, 500.00 and 0027365744 in the amount of $30,544.59, matured on June 16, 2001. Both of the Certificates are principal payable to the City of Encinitas. At maturity, both Cetffwates were rolled into now Ca tificates (principal payable to the City of Encinitas) as follows: #027365736 rolled into #027370721 in the principal amount of $752,200.52, {1027';65744 rolled into #027370748 in the principal amount of $32,544.50. The new Certificates of Deposit were opened for 32 days and will automatically renew every 32 days. The first maturity date will be July 28, 2001. Changes to the Certificate of Deposits require the Wm wledgement of the City. Please have the City of Fncinitas sign the acknowledgement portion of this letter and Fax to my attention. Please forward the original aignature to this office, A self addressed stamped envelope is enclosed for your convenience. Thank you for your help in this matter. If I can answer any questiona, please contact me. Sin Iucy Flores JUL -23 -01 15 =22 FROM< CORNERSTONE COMMUNITIES ID= 8584523600 PACE 3/3 July 18, 2001 Page 2 Acknowledgement of changes to CaRiRcate of Deposit 9027365744 and #0273 6573 6 described above, on deposit at City National Hank. JUL -23 -01 15:21 FROM:CORNERSTONE COMMUNITIES ID:8584523600 4M'CI'IY NATIONAL BANK REAL E5YAYE ORowP$+1N OF= 4275 CWXUriVE SOUML, Surm 760 LA Jot-LA, CALIFDRIIA 92037 85"42-4072 FAX 858-942-4986 LUar Fume; LFI- DYiEa�IhHn_. CAM AomworIw Y1w aPWIAL'gr. OR July 18, 2001 Mr. Jack Robson Cornerstone Communities Corporation 4365 Executive Drive, Sprite 600 San Diego, CA 92121 Re: Encinitas Ranch Apartments/City of Encinitas/Certificates of Deposit Dear Jack, PAGE 2/3 The Cartificates of Deposit opened June 16, 2000 as accolmt #027365736 in the amount 5751,500.00 and #027365744 in the amount of $30,544.59, matured on June 16, 2001. Both of the Certificates are principal payable to the City of Encinitas. At maturity, both Certificates were rolled into new Certificates (principal payable to the City of 6ncinhes) as follows: 9027365736 rolled into #027370721 in the principal amount of $752,200.52. #027365744 rolled into #027370748 In the principal amount of $32,544.50. The new Certificates of Deposit were opened for 32 days and will automatically renew every 32 days. The first maturity date will be July 28, 2001. Changes to the Certificate of Deposits requiro the acknowledgement of the City. Please have the City of Encinitas sign the acknowledgement portion of this letter and Fax to my attention Please forward the original signature to this office. A self addressed stamped envelope is enclosed for your convenience. Thank you for your help in this mattes, If I can answer any questions, please contact me, Sin Lucy Flores F=720TI] JUL -23 -01 15:22 FROM - CORNERSTONE COMMUNITIES IO:6564523600 PACE 3/3 July 18, 2001 Page 2 Acknowledgement of changes to Catti&eate of Deposit ,4027365744 and,4027365736 deaaibed above, on deposit at City National Batik. C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 6538GI PARCEL NO. : 257 -040 -4600 PLAN NO.: 6538 -G JOB SITE ADDRESS: 700BLK VIA CANTEBRIA APPLICANT NAME ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 9823 PACIFIC HEIGHTS BLVD. #J PHONE NO.: 858- 457 -4350 CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: 92121- CONTRACTOR : CORNERSTONE COMMUNITIES CORPORATION LICENSE NO.: 697803 ENGINEER : SAFINO- BUTCHER- ORMONDE INC. PERMIT ISSUE DAT PERMIT EXP. TE: 11227/T07 167/ -0o'o 2/01/01 PERMIT ISSUED BY: INSPECTOR' RONALD QUIGG ----- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- PERMIT FEES S DEPOSITS - PHONE NO.: 619 - 458 -9700 LICENSE TYPE: B PHONE -: 858- 560 -1141 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 6,350.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 2. INSPECTION FEE : 15,501.00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 450,017.00 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 ----------- -------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------------------- EARTHWORK /STORM DRAINAGE /SITE RETAINING WALLS /EROSION CONTROL FOR FUTURE 120 APARTMENTS /3,000SF OFFICE ON LOT 45, TRACT 94 -066, UNITS 1 -3. DIRT: 8.5KCY CUT /3.3KCY IMPORT /11.8KCY FILL. DRAIN: 1,240LF PIPE /2EA INLET /3EA CO /2EA CB /91OLF DITCH /SEA AREA /lEA COLLAR /VAR REM. WALL: 8KSF GRAVITY. LETTER DATED SEP 21 2000 APPLIES. WORK IN ROW BY SEPARATE PERMIT. - - -- INSPECTION ------ ---- - - -- -- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. SIGNA JA�-� R065s-� PRINT NAME �' CIRCLE ONE: 1(SQF1110ER' '", L DATE SIGNED TELEPHQ;4EEE N BER AGENT OTHER C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 6538PE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARCEL NO. : 257- 040 -4600 PLAN NO.: 6538 -G JOB SITE ADDRESS: 700BLK VIA CANTEBRIA APPLICANT NAME ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 9823 PACIFIC HEIGHTS BLVD. #J PHONE NO.: 858- 457 -4350 CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: 92121- CONTRACTOR : WESTERN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INC. PHONE NO.: 619 - 443 -8569 LICENSE NO.: 351178 LICENSE TYPE. B INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: ROYAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE POLICY NO. : KZB514135 POLICY EXP. DATE: 5/10/01 ENGINEER : SAFINO- BUTCHER - ORMONDE INC. O 858 -560 -1141 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 12/06/00 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 5 /10 /01 PERMIT ISSUED BY: INSPECTOR: RONALD QUIGG ------------------ - - - -- -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS ----------------- ----- - - - - -- 1. PERMIT FEE 271.00 2. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 3. SECURITY DEPOSIT .00 --- ---------------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK --------- - - - - -- ---------------- CONNECT SITE STORM DRAINAGE TO PUBLIC STORM DRAIN IN GARDEN VIEW RD, REPAIR TRENCH PER CITY STANDARD, 2 LOCATIONS, ALL PER COVENANT RE: MAINTENANCE /REMOVAL. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN REQUIRED PRIOR TO START OF WORK. - - -- INSPECTION ---------- - - - --- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION f�i� �i:��i4�1•Y9�[NuM[�]N I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. PRINT NAME CTRCLE ONE: "NO 2. AGENT 3. OTHER OK 7 7-oo-> DATE SIGNED TELEPHONE NUMBER Project Name: a o Project No.: 9yct� - d32 Date: / /v o/ Report No. Location: �i c i, f /S" C w Author: �% / A qBN / / /r�/W, Day: T W T F S S Client/Contractor: SupUForem Weather: Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: Observation[Testing of: W. //, sr�l. Tech NFL Equipment Working: IIErryvpk�' Hours /,D Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: / l' �s/ e /O JSP(� ✓f r (/OrKf, l �r //'4Ml -� /�t/r/i��OYU(/ On,-/ lo.++ or /I v Ht /4 +Gr, / o-% �P •' Lv K r7 F rA /na 6i. 6rot/ Li> /it 6 fruC �S — o/fr,q/ -3 SQ1� ✓. %r� 1.1 rs rrruMisr <.. �� rc.•,F.orFr� Tolty�^y'�n wP�-I,� ort n'�a:Prl/ rho of ecwr /ark fD c. .7 r,nr »uNf 671, /(/ /o, L a•. Oar �rr P/.. *S /7f'/ (/Si /01 G// iUa Evr4� 'ek- ra.tf>nvrl e'(, %/r w 'r , tr.f pr,✓do Ww 4 i q — - C✓/ A +4 �ti p / SIG/ /O L Gr�C �/� / L.%4 / � fi Page _of _ M�11' LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Received 13y: Print 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - ClienUAgency Copy /� -/a -a � i�a� �� Project Name: o/1I7 Ti P Project No.: q Date: / 61 Report No. Location: Author:,/ N.�, Day. M)e W T F S S Client/Contractor: E257-0/ J Supt/Foreman: M Weather: GL e-4r� Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: Observation/Testing of: � � P Orn /^ Tech Equipment Working: GO%11JL/L /AND /l /[D (,J: siC kF,?_ E x /s3 vA Tae AM 4-*K B ,rN /No R04. L/ N 6- Hours Q `•S Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: / O/J / Y^, le f 6Qr/e-/ /�p �s:ar ^in e� /A n �vi /Clrr vrr {m. cc.ff••r rna/P.r + /o�/ a� o�E� -� /o/ %o�✓v� F cr�ouf��— r r.! //E>< -40 /ore a5 IAGe4, /1/ all Of!/ /4 WG /,CP/r [/U AC1�in rW?7' /rt'! q�Fr/ C yrJ ev ! /s 76 re QC pSS some A�n4r P// /rr -U/ 'I 4"'q SY t-V4 /� LEI CC/ CJ' rU IrC/�,t toG//s/' /Hr /1�5. 1f � K e- 01f14f �NAPl 74o // ('OH �%or �/ 4,1 7� /ro 4✓�l� he CO.tr 1-20e,4 O /117Farl s 041�4r eO wry /1 i'1pf�r Y %OS? /rJ ��✓p"/'p 11r /o Lr /P /G' *r/ 'S /� X 4!/ f Oil �7n [/�S 70 /O � / r ✓/' !✓ /O r� � 1/I / � QN G✓a Siu/4 / /Oh i // Cc %�Jer41 Jn. - Lo% ✓F�v /� (e rn Di 12 /3 D( c n �S Page of lX LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Re eiv By: Prl t lO fIc�PAN 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow- Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy W Pro ect Name: - T Project No.: Date: Report No. 2g - ©32 2 /8 0/ Location: Author :��JJ � Day: M )/W T F S S Client/Contractor: c sTau �, SupUForeman: Weather: � 711 c.�IVo Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: ObservatlonlTestin E _. Tech a Fill.. ,�,� " Equipment Working: Hours I Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: j� vito Wall f A0141«/rt(l if "'St wt ^> AM iv o,64oevell-ed �1 !� f r Xv ` / /! /n /!i/ / o� /in K/l7ilFii %/n /!✓�/ / <rf /r ps+ rF<-p -�<! s t /c/< ire a /!P 212 oxegs rill Jalerell �Qr! 1/n�f //teA t9vichavig area < / A w areezz +,�o over Aat Yl ,f r k of a/. 41 0,4, QCc! A sIly 4s/c SAOL✓ C-9 r,02 O//c t //Oh //� i w V!/ p J> /S � hf Y!'r4f cOMHoMf ln /l. DY /S4rU %4 KQ /Yro N// Gf o /A ri�l o . ,n /Oic° e l / h,&,41 / +/r o•,�no hlrC 6or /e!,' // /w <es>/ .,! r..�o�w.•/ ci . p'sc urs <e� ,,��/y h/I TYf /c7lh �d /nlrl�gwe 7�t drt,n• f S S�tM // /CCeMM�npi �� is L£✓s7sirslr or >o. rt /i..,.� ww�� o/ •car.. ,�lw e. /tYr. lnr., /,or+s /n,�wo�r4l s Sir cj 40� rt r ef,'ens. Jo or r it a.t1s Lio,✓ O� Page _of LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. R Iv y: VC �— DAILY FIELD REPORT Prin G J 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - ClienUAgency Copy 1 Project Name: PO.>4'ut,,a R, Project No.: 9yong -o32 Date: /Z�/9 0/ Report No. Lo/- cation: C✓IC I7, "a% t!., Authorr�:// A /V 0, /,4 Day: M T 1%V T F S S Client/Contractor: O"e, flee Supt/Fore an: T/M Weather: GP i a� Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: Observatior7nFresting of ,L' n 1 /� H1 J 4(F Tech 0A i Equipment Working: T ✓r,r� Itlir , � Qvl� /�� 'tis <�>•,- / Hours S,o Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: Ifs fv I>Srl ✓7 f�S PT // lY! �� r0 ✓� Or� //, d ✓• ✓o � �/7 /f qwp �Oe rllr /n �/i >. /„/s rE�r+�- // (T /^ ��C/�I' (On f /liS C� /M Ur' /N>o A', 'I d5 G✓(r11 `S // 104eli ( /f/"7n �I Oflf �i ty I" a"'O' ✓irt Aov arM bvc rr! S!✓i>l 411 U� /✓n r4� over 4o"f trri/S tvr,, b/ r/ t +l-1 ' jr o {v Lev N4,1 DrNat 1rfi3 1A -4-# a /nls /6�� ai, ofur / *AlIvAell S ws ? 90% VA AJ'Qy- ( iM <r�ron. ftworme / I UH A vt //1�7N rs /o�x C Loale CIr v/S /10/0 /r /47/ 011A o/ % /P %ri. rr,n,. !�✓/ l/ F^. /rrc✓MpodJ It)— AoG•1 air PO eA/Slf 5AUU1,1be l /ir� (/S /^ NMi ✓.P / /t r or+ ar�io+ /rr/�nr ril. Page _of MQ LEI GHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FIELD REPORT R cei eyDAILY Pint ° CAI 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client)Agency Copy r :5 City0f E72CZ121ta c September 21, 2000 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Encinitas Ranch Apartments, L.L.C. 9823 Pacific Heights Boulevard, Suite J San Diego, CA 92121 Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering Re: Case 98 -295 MUP /DR /CDP "Poinsettia Ridge Apartments" (120 Apartments /3,000Sf Office near Vi Cantebria @ Garden View Rd) Grading Application 6538GR [Rough Grading /Erosion Control) A.P.N. 257- 040 -46 -00 Permit issuance requirements This correspondence shall serve to briefly summarize the Engineering Permit process. Drawing 6538 -G has been resubmitted by the Engineer of Work, and is subject to review by Subdivision Engineering staff. When the plan is deemed to be correct and all comments addressed, then staff will request submittal of mylar originals for approval by the Director of Engineering Services. An approval is valid for three years. In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per this Drawing, you will need to satisfy the following requirements: (1) Obtain all plan approvals. Provide four blueline copies of the approved Drawing, and one extra copy of the soil report by Leighton & Associates, dated April 26, 2000. (2) Post Security Deposit as follows: (a) GRADING PERMIT --- in the amount of $450,017.00 to guarantee performance of earthwork, storm drainage, site retaining walls, trench repair, and erosion control, and (b) PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT... in the amount of $2,412,00 to guarantee connection of site storm drainage to the public storm drain in Garden View Road and related trench repair. Up to 80% of the amount in 2(a) and 100% of the amount in 2(b) may be in the form of a Performance Bond issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Twenty percent of the amount in 2(a) has to be in the form of cash, certificates of deposit, a letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Any financial instrument's format is subject to approval. Complete the Security Obligation Agreement. (3) Pay non - refundable Inspection and Permit Fees as follows: WGRADING PERMIT... of $15,501.00, and (b)PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT... of $271.00. MMAo /J SG /f:case/ 1998/98 -295 i. doc I TEL -60- 633 -2600 r IAN 7i9,.r..: ;us S, \ ulLan Avenuc, I.ncirur.r.. r..diGania 72024.161; '110 -60- 634 -2700 !r� recycled paper (4) Provide the name, address, telephone number, and state license number of the construction contractor. Construction affecting public improvements is restricted to qualified contractors. Depending on the work to be done, the contractor will need to possess as follows either a valid: (a) Type "A" General Engineering, any work, (b) Type "C -12" Grading & Paving, any surface improvement or repair, or (c) Type "C -34" Pipeline, any storm drainage, state license, and meet the minimum insurance requirements as stated on the accompanying handout. (5) Execute the enclosed Encroachment Maintenance & Removal Covenant. The Engineer of Work will need to prepare Attachments "A" and "B" as per the samples; both the proposed connection at the entry on Garden View Road and the existing connection from the desilting basin, all to the public storm drain under the same road, will need to be described. Pay the applicable Recording Fee, payable to the County Recorder at the rate of $8.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. Submit for approval and recordation. (6) Provide a work schedule that includes all the work to be done at the site (7) Sign the Permits. Any authorized representative of the property owner may sign. Permits are valid for no more than one year and may expire earlier due to expirations on letters of credit and /or insurance policies. Once the Engineering Permits are issued, advance notice of 48 hours must be given prior to you or your contractor scheduling the mandatory pre - construction conference. See Grading Note #9. The Project Planner, Patrick Murphy, who can be contacted at (760) 633 -2696, may also need to attend. Informal phasing of the project may necessitate more than one such conference. A separate Right -of -way Construction Permit will be required for any work in the public rights - of -way of Via Cantebria and Garden View Road that is not shown on the approved Drawings. Typically, this work may include excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install potable water, sanitary sewer, reclaimed water, electric, gas, telephone, and cable television services, and construction of driveway approaches. A Permit Fee of $250.00 per application and a site plan will be required. The contractor license and insurance requirements will remain unchanged. Permits must be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the start of work. Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits are handled. A Traffic Control Plan, acceptable to the Traffic Engineering Division, will be required prior to the start of any work within the rights -of -way of Via Cantebria and Garden View Road. A typical plan shows all delineation, tapering, advance signage and temporary striping, barricades, flagman positions, and provides a schedule of operations. For more detail, contact Raymond Guarnes, Engineering Technician, at (760) 633 -2704. Construction changes, prepared by the Engineer of Work, should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposit. M M /to /JSG /f case/ 1998/98 -295 i. doc2 Prior to issuance of any Building Permit, the following requirements, but not necessarily all the requirements, will have to be satisfied: The Landscape Plan will need to be approved and added to the Grading Plan. II. The (Public) Improvement Plan will need to be approved, and the improvements secured to the satisfaction of the City and the relevant special districts. Per.Item IV the improvements will have to be permitted and completed, including at least the first lift of pavement for vehicular parking and access. Ill. The Precise Grading Plan will need to be approved as a Construction Change, then added to the (Rough) Grading Plan. IV. A Rough Grading Approval will be needed from the assigned Engineering Inspector. At a minimum, rough grading is defined as certified pad preparation and soil compaction, substantial completion of improvements, including underground utilities, and safe access. A proportional reduction of up to 75% of the Security Deposit assigned to the Grading Permit may be merited and forthcoming. A separate Improvement Permit is required to construct per proposed Drawing 6538 -1. The contractor licensing and insurance, and advance notification requirements remain unchanged. As- builts of Drawing 6538 -G, prepared by the Engineer of Work and approved by the Engineering Services Department, will be required prior to Final Inspection. The property owner and contractor will be responsible for the restoration of property comer monuments moved or destroyed by the grading activity. A licensed land surveyor or qualified civil engineer will be needed to do the work, subsequently filing a Comer Record with the County. See Grading Note tl6. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection with respect to all Engineering Permits is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposits so assigned. Please note that Building Permit final inspections are a separate event apart from any Engineering Permit final inspection and are not necessarily coincidental. This letter is limited in scope. During the Building Permit process, you will need services and be subject to regulation from as follows: the Current Planning Division, Building Inspection Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, and San Dieguito Water District, all of the City, and the Leucadia County Water District, Encinitas Union School District, and San Dieguito Union High School District, all separate public agencies. Please inquire at their respective counters. Additional engineering requirements will be forthcoming during the Building Permit process, including, but not necessarily limited to, coordination of the building site plan with the grading plan, resolution of any outstanding public improvement issues, and assessment and collection of flood control and traffic mitigation fees. MM /to /JSG /f:case/ 1998/98.295i.doc3 If there should be a substantial delay in the start of your project, please request an update of this letter. It is highly recommended that you coordinate your work schedule with all the relevant departments and districts. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2780, or you may wish to visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center. Sincerely, /(49 - Jeffrey S. Garami Engineering Technician Subdivision Engineering cc Safi no, Butcher & Ormonde, Inc., Engineer of Work Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Ronald Ouigg, Engineering Inspector Greg Caudill, Engineering Technician permit /fHe enc General Construction Permit Security Obligation Agreement Encroachment Maintenance & Removal Covenant Right -of -way Construction Permit Standard Conditions Requirements for Proof of Insurance Utility Trench Backfill and Resurfacing Standard M M /to /J SG /f --case/ 1 998/98 -295 i. doc4 ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC �� 4365 Executive Drive, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92121 Telephone (858) 458 -9700 ♦ Facsimile (858) 452 -3600 �v ta?1++�T5 M.tSSt..�G December 12, 2001 Ron Quigg City of Encinitas Engineering Inspector 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: Encinitas Ranch Apartments Grading Permit No. 6538G� Dear Ron: ®E8.5 S(TG- SCR$$i' c�oatc C�oaoEu�u� The work under grading permit 6538GI has been completed and we request that the security deposit totaling $450,017.00 be reduced by 75 %. Currently, there is American Motorists Bond No. 3SM 986 068 00, and City National Bank Letter of Credit No. 001206.OD.1400 in place as security. We realize that usually you give a cross the board reduction (75% bond and 75% Letter of Credit), but it would help us out greatly if you could cancel the letter of credit, and reduce the bond to $112,504.25. This would keep the required 25% of the total security for the one year warranty period. Thank you for your assistance with this. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (858) 458 -9700, extension 120 if you have any questions or require any additional information. Sincerely, ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC Robson, Agent Jim Knowlton Greg Shields Debbie Geishart f'J`+i I . - /n/ Project Name: Project No.: 110028.02 Date: £ eport No. Z a Lo�ct- at -�lon: Autho WA- 4k+ Dog: M T W T Y S S ClienVContractor: /.,ris�onL Field Supervisor: Geologist: SupUFore an: Weather: i1 li 76-n TiM LLe U Soil Engineer: Observation/Testing of: ^ /-v.m Equipment Working: rxC4VOY0/ Rt1111 Wl, c(,•� SToday's L&Aora w�cKr1< Tech Hours AIAM ge I�RIh 8.o Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: Oaf// Mm�riA Le l S, r GIr �,-r C/Ya P n/ /S/ it Di rLf ,f q H rJD/ G✓�Ay1�� it Y4 - Mir�tr. rf /4 /P aN vr� �/ /�'Li �/K O I ri(�1��1 O///�7 �1h�rLpr LSfS Page _of EFQI%ql Lu � i LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT flat ' d�Ll G Prl 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - ClienUAgency Copy California Regional Water Qualit y Control Board San Diego Region Winston H. Hickox Serretaryfor Environmental Protection October 11, 2001 9174 Sky Puk Court, Suite I oo, San Diego, California 92123 Phone (858) 467 -2952 • FAX (858) 5715972 Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested 7001 0320 0001 2637 9454 Mr. Jack Robson Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. 4365 Executive Drive, Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92121 File No. 10- 3013698.02 Dear Mr. Robson: ADOPTION OF ORDER NO. 2001 -173, "ADMINISTRATIVE ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL LIABILITY AGAINST ENCINITAS RANCH, L.L.P., NONCOMPLIANCE WITH ORDER NO.99- 08 -DWQ" Enclosed is a copy of Administrative Civil Liability Order No. 2001 -173, adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region on October 10, 2001, for the amount of $105,575. In accordance with Order No. 2001 -173, Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. shall provide $41,575 to the City of Encinitas by October 17, 2001; shall pay $50,000 by November 10, 2001 to the State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account; and shall provide not less than $14,000 for a minimum of eight storm water workshops by January 15, 2002. In addition to the payment of liability, Order 2001 -173 contains other requirements, therefore, I urge you to review the Order carefully. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Vicente Rodriguez of my staff at (858) 627 -3940. Respectfully, 66HN H. ROBERTUS Executive Officer Enclosure: Administrative Civil Liability Order No. 2001 -173 JHR:mja:vrr California Environmental Protection Agency The energy challenge faring California is mat. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. Fora list of simple ways you ran redure demand and cut your energy costs, see our Web.sae at hirpr //www.s reb.ca.gov. Recyrled Paper 1i V Mr. Robson - 2 - October 11, 2001 cc w /enclosure: Mr. S. Wayne Rosenbaum, Esq., Foley and Lardner 402 West Broadway, 23rd Floor, San Diego, CA 92101 -3542 Ms. Kathy Weldon, City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 Mr. Steve Fuller, USEPA Region IX 28400 Portsmouth Dr., Sun City, CA 92586 Mr. John Richards, Esq., SWRCB P.O. Box 100, Sacramento, CA 95812 Mr. Marco Ganzalez, Esq., 2924 Emerson Street, Suite 220, San Diego, CA Mr. James Peugh, San Diego Audubon Society 2321 Morena Boulevard, Suite D, San Diego CA 92110 California Environmental Protection Agency CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SAN DIEGO REGION ORDER NO. 2001-173 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL LIABILITY AGAINST ENCINITAS RANCH, L.L.P. NONCOMPLIANCE WITH ORDER NO. 99 -08 -DWQ The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region (hereinafter Regional Board), finds the following: Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. discharged waste (storm water runoff containing sediment) and pollutants from a sedimentation basin to Cottonwood Creek in violation of Prohibition A.2 of Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 99 -08 -DWQ, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated With Construction Activity (General Permit) on February 12, 27, and 28, 2001 for a total of 3 days. 2. Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. violated Provision C.2 of Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 99 -08 -DWQ by failing to develop and implement an adequate Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) from December 1, 2000, through March 26, 2001, for a total of 115 days. 3. In Complaint No. 2001 -154 for Administrative Civil Liability the Executive Officer recommended imposition of civil liability in the amount of $301,800 for the violations alleged in Complaint No. 2001 -154. 4. Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. has proposed the following settlement terms: a) Total civil liability in the amount of $ 105,575, to be assessed as follows: i) 3 days of discharge at $10,000 per day (total $30,000), ii) discharge of 13,583 gallons of storm water runoff consisting of or containing sediments and other wastes and pollutants at $0.30 per gallon (total $4,075), and iii) failure to develop and implement an adequate SWPPP for a period of 115 days at $621.74 per day (total $71,500). b) Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. shall waive the right to request a hearing on this matter before the Regional Board, and waive the right to petition the State Water Resources Control Board on this matter. Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. ACL - 2 - October 10, 2001 Tentative Order No. 2001 -173 c) Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. shall pay $50.000 to the State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account and shall pay an additional $55,575 for two Supplemental Environmental Projects. i) Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. shall pay $41,575 to the City of Encinitas to develop a Cottonwood Creek Urban Runoff Assessment and Action Plan as detailed in the Attachment of the letter dated August 3, 2001, from the Regional Board Executive Officer to Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. ii) Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P shall pay $14,000 for providing a minimum of eight storm water workshops, as more fully described in the letter dated August 3, 2001, from the Regional Board Executive Officer to Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. 5. The Regional Board gave notice of Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P.'s settlement proposal to the public for a comment period of at least 30 days and held a hearing to solicit public participation in this matter, and considered the comments of interested persons regarding acceptance of the settlement offered by Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. 6. The settlement offer by Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. as proposed in Finding No. 4 is an appropriate resolution of the violations alleged in Complaint No. 2001 -154 because of the following reasons: a. Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. waives its right to a hearing and waives its right to petition the State Board for review under California Water Code Section 13320. b. Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. took immediate actions to achieve compliance. c. The settlement of $105,575 is a sufficient amount of liability to deter Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. and other dischargers from non - compliance. d. The settlement of $105,575 is still consistent with the State Board enforcement assessment matrix for violations characterized as Major compliance significance and Major environmental significance. e. The City of Encinitas was fully engaged with the Regional Board staff before and during enforcement efforts, and the City of Encinitas does not object to the settlement for an amount less than the original recommended amount. f. Settlement allows the Regional Board to redirect formal enforcement resources to other high priority violations. 7. The Regional Board incurred costs totaling $25,000, which includes field investigations, preparation of enforcement documents, and public hearings. This enforcement action is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 3, Section Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. ACL - 3 - October 10, 2001 Tentative Order No. 2001 -173 21000 et seq.) in accordance with Section 15308, Chapter 3, Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that pursuant to Section 13385 of the California Water Code, that civil liability is imposed on Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. in the amount of one hundred -five thousand five hundred seventy -five dollars ($105,575), and that 1) Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. shall pay fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) by November 10, 2001 to the State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account. 2) Payments of the remaining portion of the civil liability, fifty -five thousand five hundred seventy -five dollars ($55,575) shall be suspended on condition that Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. completes the two supplemental environmental projects listed below successfully. a) Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P shall provide $41,575 to the City of Encinitas by October 17, 2001, for the development of a Cottonwood Creek Urban Runoff Assessment and Action Plan. If, upon completion of the project, the total project cost of the project is not expended, the remainder of the monies allocated for that project shall be paid to the State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account. i) This supplemental environmental project shall be completed as described it the Supplemental Environmental Project Apphcation Form as submitted by the City of Encinitas dated July 26, 2001. Any deviation from the Supplemental Environmental Project Application Forms must receive prior written approval by the Regional Board. ii) Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. shall submit written verification, executed by City of Encinitas, that each task has been completed and an exact accounting of monies spent on each task to the Regional Board within 30 days of completion of the task. b) Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. shall provide not less than $14,000 to provide a minimum of eight storm water workshops by January 15, 2002, as described in finding 4. c) ii) of this Order. i) Any deviation from the Supplemental Environmental Project must receive prior written approval by the Regional Board. ii) Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. shall submit a final status report by February 15, 2001, to the Regional Board. The status report shall contain an audit of expenditures of the allocated $14,000. iii) If, upon completion of the eight workshops, the total project cost is not expended, the remainder of the monies allocated for that project shall be paid to the State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account. Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. ACL - 4 - October 10, 2001 Tentative Order No. 2001 -173 iv) If all eight of the workshops are not satisfactorily completed by January 15, 2001, the full $14,000 shall be paid to the State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account. 3) All projects must be completed by the completion dates listed above. Failure to complete projects, late or inadequate completion of projects shall cause the total project cost to become due and payable, for the specific project in question, to the State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account. 4) Each Supplemental Environmental Project shall be identified by Encinitas Ranch, L.L.P. as a project that has been funded by order of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region through the adoption of Administrative Civil Liability Order No. 2001 -173, dated October 10, 2001, for violations of the California Water Code and the Clean Water Act. I, John H. Robertus, Executive Officer, do hereby certify the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an order imposing civil liability assessed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, on October 10, 2001. ACL Order No. 2001 -173 (October 10. 2001).doc OHN H. ROBERTUS Executive Officer 07/23/2002 08:26 7607830110 NSA PAGE 61 Sent By. Copy To: 4405 Manchester Avenue • Suite 101 .Encinitas • California *92024 . 760, 943.8180 -FAX 760.783.0110 Warren W. Scott + Architecture LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL: To.' Into; c�.� t r�iPf,,1�e.�� Date: i I . 2=2 EADC Job No: Re: I - -- I Transmitting: Quantity Date: Description: 7. 11 2871 2Sr�jcc c cf PY„`-,er Lt,4 bt��v.ry�'• t.c�rren c�r1 C'r,rr..1 �c"ciC�' _ ForAppro✓al: U.S. Mail/U.P.S.: Fax: For Review: Special Postage No. of sheets including cover_ As Requested Messenger For Your Use Hold for Pick -up: Remarks: Sent By. Copy To: 4405 Manchester Avenue • Suite 101 .Encinitas • California *92024 . 760, 943.8180 -FAX 760.783.0110 07/23/2002 08:26 7607830110 WSA PAGE 02 Project Schedule 1139 Eolus Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 • Permit Obtained: c Monday, June 24 Site Pre- construction meeting: o Thursday, June 27, 9:30am ■ City Inspector ■ Salm Engineering ■ Coast Geotechnical • Warren Scott • Site Prep, Tree removal: • Start ■ Tuesday, July 9, 2002, • Completion • Friday, July 12, 2002, • Site Grading (on site): Q Start • Monday, July 15, 2002, • Removal and re- compaction of soils with inspection for certification of compaction by Soils Engineer • Add erosion controls ■ Tuesday, July 23, 2002, • Final grades and Pad with certification by Surveyor • Undergrounds as required ■ Wednesday, July 24, 2002, • Add landscaping to slopes • Prepare Redline As -built drawings by Surveyor or Civil Engineer o Completion ■ Wednesday, July 31, 2002, • Inspection by City 07/23/2002 08:26 7607830110 WSA PAGE 03 Project Team Members 1139 Eolus Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Owners: Warren and Cheryl Scott 1117 Eolus Avenue Encinitas, Ca 92024 760.944.1388 Warren Scott Warren W. Scott, Architecture 4405 Manchester Avenue, Suite 101 Encinitas, CA 92024 780.943.8180 Cet 760.613.1388 Fax: 760.783.0110 Email: wscoM- wsaaia.cam Cheryl Scott Pepp Travel 4405 Manchester Avenue, Suite 102 Encinitas, CA 92024 760.942. 9770 Fax: 760.943.7377 Construction Consultant: Ron Whlthall 3841 Mararet Way Carlsbad, CA Cal. 760.525.4940 Architect Warren Scoff Warren W. Scott, Architecture 4405 Manchester A venue, Suite Encinitas, CA 92024 760.943.8180 Cal: 760, 613,1388 Fax: 760.783.0110 Email: wscottt$lwsaaia.com Soils Engineer. Mark Burwell Coast Geotechnioal 779 Academy Drive Solana Beach, CA 858- 755 -8622 Fax. 858. 755.9128 Civil Engineer. Vince Sampo 274 Rodney Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 760.436.0660 Fax: 760.436.5841 Surveyor: Mik Email: mhtMtns.net Grading Contractor: Mike Salm Salm Engineering and Grading P.O. Box 1360 Fallbrook, CA 92088 760.728.0662 Fax: 760. 728.6352 Cal: 760.801.3474 Tree Arborist: David Brown North Coast Arborist, Inc. 449 Santa Fe Drive, #106 Encinitas, CA 92024 760.436.6062 Fax: 760.635.7974 Email. ncarborist@earthlink.net 101 Structural Engineer: Paul Christenson Palos Verde Engineering 6027 -1 Paseo Deficias P.O. Box 2211 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 858- 759 -2434 Fax: 858-759 -8324 Email: pvecrst0,eajbjjrzk.ne t Grading Inspector (City of 92075 Encinitas): Ron Quigg Cat 760, 802.8147 Fax: 760 -833 -2618 IS® CITY NATIONAL BANK [X]CITY NATIONAL BANK INTERNATIONAL DEPT. 606 SOUTH OLIVE STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 SWIFT ADDRESS:CINAUS6L TEL No.(213) 347 -2300 FAX No.(213) 347 -2327 ISSUE DATE: 12/06/2000 [ ]CITY NATIONAL BANK INTERNATIONAL DEPT. STE 300 351 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 TLX No. 825717 TLX No. 6771223 TEL No. (415) 576 -2700 FAX No. (415) 362 -4549 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 001206.OD.1400 BENEFICIARY: CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. VULCAN ENCINITAS, CA 92024 APPLICANT: ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC 10679 WESTVIEW PARKWAY SAN DIEGO, CA 92126 AMOUNT: USD 90,003.40 NINETY THOUSAND THREE 40/100 U.S. DOLLARS EXPIRY DATE AND PLACE: 12/01/2001 ISSUING BANK, INTL DEPT. GENTLEMEN: COPY WE HEREBY ESTABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IN YOUR FAVOR AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT BY YOUR DRAFT(S) AT SIGHT DRAWN ON CITY NATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND ACCOMPANIED BY DOCUMENTS AS SPECIFIED BELOW: 1. THIS ORIGINAL STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT, AND AMENDMENT(S), IF ANY. 2. BENEFICIARY'S SIGNED AND DATED STATEMENT WORDED AS FOLLOWS: "I, (NAME OF SIGNER), AN AUTHORIZED SIGNER OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, CERTIFY THAT ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE PERMIT NO. 6538 -6 ISSUED BY THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF GARDEN VIEW AND VIA CANTEBRIA, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA." EACH DRAFT MUST STATE "DRAWN UNDER CREDIT NO. 001206.OD.1400 OF CITY NATIONAL BANK, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA." WE HEREBY ENGAGE WITH YOU THAT ALL DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS CREDIT SHALL BE DULY HONORED IF PRESENTED FOR PAYMENT AT THE OFFICE OF CITY NATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, 606 SOUTH OLIVE STREET, SUITE 300, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90014 ON OR BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS CREDIT. EXCEPT SO FAR AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY STATED, THIS CREDIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDBY PRACTICES 1998 ( "ISP98 "), INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION NO. 590. U14 61" AUTHOR.LZFD SIGNATURE AUTHCIRIZED S NATURE TO MAN YUEN CH YUK WAH WONG VICE PRESIDENT ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT ORIGINAL 4MOTY NAToONAL BANK (X]CITY NATIONAL BANK [ ]CITY NATIONAL BANK INTERNATIONAL DEPT. INTERNATIONAL DEPT. 606 SOUT;{ OLIVE STREET, STE 300 351 CALIFORNIA STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90014 SWIFT ADDRESS:CINAUS6L TLX No. 825717 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 TEL No.(213) 347 -2300 TLX No. 6771223 TEL No. (415) 576 -2700 FAX No. (: ?P3) 347 -2327 FAX No. (915) 362 -4549 ISSUE DATE: 12/06/2000 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 001206.OD.1400 BENEFICIARY: CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. VULCAN ENCINITAS, CA 92024 APPLICANT: ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC 10679 WESTVIEW PARKWAY SAN DIEGO, CA 92126 AMOUNT: USD 90,003.40 NINETY THOUSAND THREE 40/100 U.S. DOLLARS EXPIRY DATE AND PLACE: 12/01/2001 ISSUING BANK, INTL DEPT, GENTLEMEN: WE HEREBY E@TABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IN YOUR FAVOR AVAILABLE FOR PAYMENT BY YOUR DRAFT(S) AT SIGHT DRAWN ON CITY NATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AND ACCOMPANIED BY DOCUMENTS AS SPECIFIED BELOW: 1. THIS ORIGINAL STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT, AND AMENDMENT(S), IF ANY. 1 2. BENEFICI'ARY'S SIGNED AND DATED STATEMENT WORDED AS FOLLOWS: "I, (NAME OF SIGNER), AN AUTHORIZED SIGNER OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, CEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, CERTIFY THAT ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE PERMIT NO. 6538 -6 ISSUED BY THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF GARDEN VIEW AND VIA CANTEBRIA, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA." EACH DRAFT MUST STATE "DRAWN UNDER CREDIT NO. 001206.00.1400 OF CITY NATIONAL BANK, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA." WE HEREBY ENGAGE WITH YOU THAT ALL DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS CREDIT SHALL BE DULY HONORED IF PRESENTED FOR PAYMENT AT THE OFFICE OF CITY NATIONAL BANK, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, 606 SOUTH OLIVE STREET, SUITE 300, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90014 ON OR BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OE' THIS CREDIT. EXCEPT SO FAR AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY STATED, THIS CREDIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDBY PRACTICES 1998 ( "ISP98 "), INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION NO. 590. 7 AUTHO SIGNATURE TO MAN DEN VICE PRESIDENT W. AUT (0! IZED S NATURE C YUK WAH WONG ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT e w uuz m T a m m ww U Fu ua rK mw Z J aW �x m � Q O ZW O Z Qa �m w t? ~ LL 30 oW �a U � m� = LL m0 W m ma J W 3 F,o F, Z o: — um as so 'o 9 4Na CITY NATIONAL BANK INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS CENTER 606 South Olive Street, Suite 300 Date 11/30/00 CABLE ADDRESS "CINABANK LSA" Los Angeles, California 90014 TELEX 825717 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT APPLICATION AND LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT J TO: CITY NATIONAL BANK ICNB) ❑ Cable We (Applicant) request you to establish by ❑ Overnight courier service an irrevocable standby Letter of Credit on ❑ Same day messenger service the following terms and conditions: ADVISING BANK Inams and address) BENEFICIARY tname and address) CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. VULCAN ENCINITAS, CA 9202A available by Draft(s) at sight on CNB and accompanied by the following: APPLICANT (name and address) ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS T.T.0 10679 WESTVIEW PARKWAY SAN DIEGO, CA 92126 AMOUNT (indicate currency —Le., U.S. E —and specify amount in figures and words S g 0, n 0 3_ NINETY THOUSAND THREE DOLLARS EXPIRY DATE AT CNB's ISSUING OFFICE ..I AN AUTHORIZED SIGNER OF THE CITY OF (Name of Signer) ENCINITAS DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, CERTIFY THAT ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE PERMIT NO. ISSUED BY THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF GARDEN VIEW AND VIA CANTEBRIA, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA. LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT In consideration of your opening, at our request, a letter of Credit (herein called "the Credit "), the terms and conditions of which appear on the reverse side hereof we hereby agree as follows: 1. As to drafts under or purporting to be under the Credit, which are payable in lawful United States funds, we agree to pay you on demand at your issuing office in lawful United States funds, the amount of such draft(s) on the presentment to you thereof or, at your request in advance. 2. As to drafts under or purporting to be under the Credit, which are payable in foreign currency, we agree to pay you at your office on demand, the equivalent of each such draft in lawful United States funds at your then prevailing rate of exchange effective for sales of that other currency for cable transfer to the country of which it is the currency. 3. We also agree to pay to you any attorneys' fees incurred in the enforcement of this Letter of Credit Agreement, your service charge in accordance with your Schedule of Fees and Charges now existing or as hereafter adopted, and all other charges and expenses paid or incurred by you in connection therewith. 4. We agree to reimburse you for any losses and charges incurred by you or made against you in connection with this Agreement and related to the reevaluation or fluctuations in the exchange rate of any currency whether United States or any other. 5. We hereby convey and transfer to you a security interest in all goods, documents and instruments which shall come into your American Mo orists nsurance Corn )any KemPeR. FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULLY EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 986 069 00 Premium (Two Years) : $100.00 — - SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Encinitas Ranch Apartments, LLC, as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Two Thousand Four Hundred Twelve & 00 /100ths DOLLARS ($2,412.00), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a contract/agreement, dated _, with the Obligee to do and perform the following work; to wit: Permanent Encroachment - Poinsettia Ridge Apartments NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALER, DARED: >Je_ember 30, ?000 nci - ch Apartments, LLC American Motorists Insurance Company (Princi al) AtNA�/ (Surety) By: 13y KeAna D. Conrad, Attorney In Fact DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: LOU JONES & ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST.. LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 . FAX (323) 256 -7218 auuUtyiJiull rcnurm Luce uun4 - u5- U- 9v.uo1 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of C L } ss On �" �cm , before me, �ityL4 J��L Date ` Name am Ti0e t personally appeared KPA?ERLY M. X)NE9 -W-• 11 71 J' an LN -, n Counly My Camm. E=m Mar 6.2MI personally known to me proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(a) whose name. &) is/ re subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she/they-executed the same in his /hOrltheic- authorized capacity(igs}, and that by his /hetr4beta_ signature(s} -on the instrument the personiial or the entity upon behalf of which the person(gl acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Place Notary Seal Above S re of Noary P Ic OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document Document Date. Number of Pages Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): TOP 01 thumb here ❑ Partner — C Limited O General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other Signer Is Representing: O 1997 Nalronal Notary AssocaWn • 9350 be Solo Ave P D. Boa 2402 • Chalsworih. CA 913132402 Prod. No 59W Recroer call Toll -Free 1- 800 -876E 27 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of County of California Los Angeles On `' '� 2g6�6 C. Clarkson � Notary Public NAME TITLE OF OFFICER personally appeared KeAna D. Conrad NAME OF SIGNER ®Personally known to me - OR -❑ n .• r �.- w.. r..Y�nQ�r proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. " WITNESS my hand and official seal. A 'Yti (SMIIIATURE OF NOTARY) OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES NCbs0W DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITYIIFSI ------ _ ------ _ ------------------------ American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company SIGNER OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE Lumbermen Mutual Casually Company lou Jones & Associates Ivry pe z. Home Office: Long Grove. IL W049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Krow All Men By These Presents: That the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, the American Motorists Insurance Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutua. Insurance Company, corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illnols, having their principal office in Long Grove. Illinois, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Company') do hereby appoint KeAna C. Conrad of Los Angeles, California—******'**** their true and lawful agents) and altomey(s)4n-fact, to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the date of issuance of this power and ending on the date specified below, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as their act and deed: Any and all bonds and undertakings provided the amount of no one bond or undertaking exceeds ONE MILLION DOLLARS (51, 000, 000. 00}»" " » » " ""' » » " » """ »"' » »'»""""" "" "'� EXCEPTION: NO ALI THORITY Is granted to make, execute, seal and deliver any bond or undertaking which guarantees the payment or collection of any promissory note, check, draft or letter of credit. This authority does not permit the same obdgadon to be split Into two or more bands In order to bring each such bond within the dollar Unit[ of authority as sat forth herein. This appointment may be revoked at any time by the Company. The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as hinting upon the said Company as rutty and amply to ail intents and purposes, as if the same had been duty executed and acknowledged by they regularly elected officers at their principal office in Long Grove, 181nois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF December 31, 2001 This Power of Attorney is executed by authority of resolutions adopted by the Examtfve Ccnyniteea of the Boards of Dlrectors of the Company on February 23, 1988 at Chicago, Imnols, true and accurate copies of which are hereinafter set forth and are hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being In full force and effect 'VOTED, That the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vlce President, or their appointees designated In writing and filed with the Secretary, or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attorneys-In-fact. and to authatze them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings, recognlzances, oontraW of Indemnity and other writings, obligatory In the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process.' This Power of Attorney is signed, sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Boards of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: 'VOTED. That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice President, or their appointees designated In writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of fie Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certifications by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Commltee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certifled with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it U attached, shall continue to be valld and binding upon the Company.' In Testimony Whereof, the Company has cawed this Instrument to be signed and their corporate seals to be affixed by their authorized officers, this July 7, 2000. Attested and Certified: M Ml I Robert P. Hanes, Secretary �.vx 4v ..� V �'�• coy lap � �•f[Il �dVM.M. by Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company S � `,, =. J. S. Kemper, III, Exec.Vlce President Amerkcan Motorists Insurance Company rcemPeR. - FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULLY EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 986 068 00 Premium (Two Years) : $5,400.00 SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Encinitas Ranch Apartments, LLC as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Three Hundred Sixtv Thousand Thirteen & 60 /100ths DOLLARS ($360,013,60), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a contract/agreement, dated 00 /00 /00, with the Obligee to do and perform the following work; to wit: Gradine - Poinsettia Ridee Apartments NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALED, DATED: November 30, 2000 Enc ch Apartments, LLC (Principal) By: American Motorists Insurance Company (Surety) By: ' &%Lui KeMa D. Conrad, Attorney In Fact DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: 01 LOU JONES & ASSOCIATES. PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST.. LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 . FAX (323) 256 -7218 Subdivision Performance Bond - 08- 25 -99. dot CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of S'a'o `('c,),�� ss. On �' D o�Nl before me, 1 Date NamerM T e i personally appeared "�� 1't 4-bL 5 y�pgrsonally known to me /I proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(g) whose nameijy is /arE subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /sleltf*y_executed the same in his /hs4tk4k authorized capacity(ier), and that by hislheFA -hau MWRIYM JONES signature(g) on the instrument the person(f& or 0 1128371 the entity upon behalf of which the peroor aL e1W acted, executed the instrument. Carrot Eq*w My Q 2Dt WITNESS my hand and official seal. Place Notary Seal Above Sig of Nobvy RAIK OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages Signers) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): Top of thumb here ❑ Partner — f Limited 11 General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: 0 1997 National Notary Assoaatim • 9350 De Solo Ave.. P.O Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313 -2402 Prod, No 5907 Reorder'. Call Toll -Free 1800- B76M27 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Los Angeles On NOV 3 0,70 C. Clarkson Notary Public NAME TITLE OF OFFICER personally appeared KeAna D. Conrad NAME OF SIGNER ®Personally known to me - OR -❑ s proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SI ATURE OF NOTARY) OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OTHER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITI'(IESI American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company Lumbermen Mutual Casualty Company ---Lou Jones & Associates DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 'Um In12 Z. Home Office: Long Grove. IL W049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Men By These Presents: That the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, the American Motorists Insurance Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutua. Insurance Company, corporations organized and existing under the laws of the State of Ilinois. having their principal office in Long Grove. Illinois, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the 'Company') do hereby appoint KeAna D. Conrad of Los Angeles, California ***'****'*'*" "" "' their true and lawful agent(s) and attorney(s)-in-fact. to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the date of Issuance of this power and ending on the date specified below, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as their ad and deed: Any and all bonds and undertakings provided the amount of no one bond or undertaking exceeds ONE MILLION DOLLARS (51,000, 000. 00)" " " « " " ""' » » " » """ »"' « » ""' »""""" "" EXCEPTION: NO AIJTHORfTY Is granted to make. execute. seal and delver arty bond or undertaking which guarantees the payment or . collection of any promissory note, check, draft or letter of credit This authority does not pemNt the same obligation to be split Into two or mare bonds N order to bring each cud+ bond within the dollar illlt of authority as set forth herein. _ This appointment may be revoked at any time by the Company. The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as birdfng upon the said Company as fully and amply to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duty executed and ac rKwiedged try their regularly elected officers at their principal office in Long Grove, Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WrrHOUT NOTICE AS OF December 31, 2001 This Power of Attorney Is executed by authority of resdutlons adopted by the Executive Commhtnes of the Boards of Directors of the Company on February 23, 1988 at Chicago, IIYnots, Irue and accurate copies of which are hereinafter set forth and are hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being In flip farce and effect 'VOTED. That the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vloe President, or their appointees designated In writing and filed with the Secretary, or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attomeWn -fad and to auth rIze them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bads and undertaklrgs, recognizances, contracts of Indermlry, and other writings, obligatory In the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process.' This Power of Attorney Is signed, sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the folkrwing resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of Ne Boards of Directors of the Company at a meeting duty called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: 'VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice President, or their appointees designated In writing and filed with the Secretary. and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certifications by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which It is attached. shalt continue to be w Ild and binding upon the Company.' In Testimony Whereof, the Company has caused this Instrument to be signed and Net corporate seals to be affixed by their authorized officers, this July 7, 2000. Attested and Certified: IIAL \L . Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company Robert P. Harries. Secretary by J. S. Kemper, III, Exec.Aoe President Q CITY OF ENCINITAS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SECURITY OBLIGATION AGREEMENT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /we Encinitas Ranch Apartments, L.L.C., Principal, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Encinitas, a municipal corporation, in the County of San Diego, State of California, in the sum of four hundred fifty- two thousa four h ed twent -nine & ($ 452,429.00 ) in the form of and ash/ oc /c /assi n on deposit with the City Finance Officer Recei ) and to be held by it until this obligation becomes void a f any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by the City of Encinitas to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provisions recited hereinafter. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known as Poinsettia Ridge Apts, in accordance with Engineering Permit No. 6538G1/PE___ _ dated 6JO , and is required by __ the City Code to give a security to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall be conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Engineering Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the ordinances and standards of the City of Encinitas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this day of Q(' fn j' , ( on�� Prin al Lcrr %2 U�.�S EKtrcctivP Dr awn Business Address BO /03 /PW1 -21wp5 8 (01/18/93 -11) CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California , t T � ss. County of'A� \�� t On I C) - 1 Date personally appeared NIMRERLY M..IOh 1128171 :.,-, c n,n ca,rrry NN Corr. Exprm My s, MD1 Place Notary Seal Above personally known to me proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personal whose name(* is /are- subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /s&JthP4_executed the same in his /IGiir /tbaip authorized capacity(iebj� and that by his /h i- signature(s -on the instrument the person(s)ror the entity upon behalf of which the person(j), acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ti1li w, ol Sg ime or Notary I W OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attache Title or Type rofpocu ment: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: (l Number of -eL, ti fi I ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): Top of thumb here ❑ Partner — F] Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: �) 1997 Natorral Notary Arlo abon • 9350 Do Solo Ave., P O. Box 2402 - Chalswwth. CA 91313 -2002 Prorl No 5907 Reorder Call Toll Free 1960.976.6827 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT / 505 S. VULCAN AVE. �--V�' ENCINITAS, CA 92024 IMPROVEMENT PERMIT PARCEL NO. : 257 -040 -4600 JOB SITE ADDRESS: 700BLK VIA CANTEBRIA APPLICANT NAME ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 9823 PACIFIC HEIGHTS BLVD *J CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: PERMIT NO.: 6538I PLAN NO.: 6538 -I PHONE NO.: 858- 457 -435( 92121- CONTRACTOR : CORNERSTONE COMMIUNITIES CORPORATION PHONE NO.: 619 - 458 -9700 LICENSE NO.: 697803 LICENSE TYPE: B INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: LEGION INDEMNITY COMPANY POLICY NO. : GL21509355 POLICY EXP. DATE: 10/15/01 ENGINEER : SAFINO- BUTCHER- ORMONDE INC. K B58- 560 -1141 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 4/25/01 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 10/15/01 PERMIT ISSUED BY INSPECTOR: RONALD QUIGG 9; - `-- -------- ----- - - -- - -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS - - - - -- ---------------------- 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 2. INSPECTION FEE 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: 4,600.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 3,240.00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 64,805.00 .00 DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------ ------ -- ---- EARTHWORK /CURB 6 GUTTER S SIDEWALK /PCC CROSS GUTTER/ FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. PCC CURB & GUTTER REMOVAL 170LF/ 6" TYPE G 140LF/ 2 FED RAMPS/ PCC CROSS GUTTER 935SF/ TRENCH RESURFACING 200LF/ STRIPING REMOVAL b INSTALLATION 8030LF/ ARROWS 7EA/ SIGNS 3EA/ TELEPHONE FED 2EA/ IRR SYSTEM 2575SF/ 90 DAY MAINTENANCE 1LS. TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIRED. coN- Al-- -T t-c, p - 1 y� a,Aan�y O. A kA pe je'- r'. ---- INSPECTION ----------- ----- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION AS- BUILTS AND ONE YEAR WARRANTY RETENTION REQUIRED. I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. SIGNATURE PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: N . AGEN. 3. 9/L,16 DATE SIGNED &L-7 4cy �- p '< 1 TELEPHONE NUMBER CITY OF ENCINITAS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SECURITY OBLIGATION AGREEMENT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /we LLC, Principal, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Encinitas, a municipal corporation, in the County of San Diego, State of California, in the sum of rj,vry �v�CF�yuSL�� G�G�}i yv DL6-(,> F)vE ($ 6y, 50C 5� ) in the form of fSer•.•, on deposit with the City Finance Officer (per Receipt # ) and to be held by it until this obligation becomes void and if any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by the City of Encinitas to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provisions recited hereinafter.'6-,w o 4 3jSt,^ 987 71S 00 The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known as 2ip6EA- P-J-,,in accordance with Engineering Permit No. _mac �$ dated `�); </o I , and is required by the City Code to give a sec rity to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall be conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Engineering Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the ordinances and standards of the City of Encinitas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the.said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this 26 "' day of _Ap�c,o_ , 1�8' 2v—D) . incipal y3 c <' E- C-L-L v� P� Business Address < A-r-, 01 (51;�' q`, C. ` B0/03 /PW1 -21wp5 8 (01/18/93 -11) American Motorists Insurance Company ICemPeR. FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULL Y EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 987 715 00 Premium (Two Years) : $972.00 SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Encinitas Ranch Apartments LLC, as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Sixtv Tour Thousand Ei ht Hundred Five and No /100ths DOLLARS ($64,805.00), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a contract/agreement, dated 2001, with the Obligee to do and perform the following work; to wit: Pointsettia Ridge Apartments NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALED, DATED: March 16, 2001 Encinitas Ranch Apartments, LLC American Motorists Insurance Company (Principal) 1�p1 I (Surety) By. By: Ure R. Kretowicz, Manager KeAna D. Conrad, Attorney In Fact DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: LOU JONES & ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 . FAX (323) 256 -7218 ........,.„�.. 1. 1........ .,— vo a vzum CALWORNWA7.i= PURPOSE ACSN(jV I;EpGMENT t State of California County of Loa Angeles On C. Clarkson Notary Public NAME TITLE OF OFFICER personally appeared KeAna D. Conrad NAME OF SIGNER ®Personally known to me - OR-E] araea•••aan �•ew••••u•egn _ C. CLe•xeN a,,t osor FIRKSfj e si; C061M. # ' NOVAy P� tfC- CALIrGn NI LOS ANGELES CCUMy ;p g 'wwJ ••••e•e•• ^e• .. rnMm Fxolry Seri 5, ZOCl proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS y han and official seal. -6'-z-� (SIGNATURE OF NOTARY) OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) PARTNER(S) F-1 LIMITED n GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES WA 161W DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company SIGNER OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE Lumbermen Mutual Casualty Company Lou Jones & Associates MEMPOR. Home Office: Long Grove. IL 80049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Men By These Presents: That the Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, the American Motorists Insurance Company, and the American Manufacturers Mutua Insurance Company corporations organized and existing under the laws of the Stale of (finals, having their principal office in Long Grove Illinois, (hershnaner collectively referred to as the - Company) do hereby appoint KoAna D. Conrad of Los Angeles, California•'•'••••'•«•' "•••'• their true and lawful agent(s) and attomey(3)-4n -fact. to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the date of issuance of this power and ending on the date specified below, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as their act and deed: Any and all bonds and undertakings provided the amount of no one bond or undertaking exceeds ONE MILLION DOLLARS (51,000, 000. 00)^"'•^»•'•••' • « « ^ ^'«..' « »' » »'«« «....• «.»•'•• EXCEPTION: NO AIftHORITY Is granted to make, execute, sea and deliver any bond or underhking which guarantees the payment or . cadectlon of any promlesory note, check, draft or letter of swift This authority does not permit the same obligation to be split Into two or more bonds In order to bring each such bond within the dollar Iimit of autthority as set forth hereln. This appointment may be revoked at any time by the Company. '.# s I . The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be all bkW4q upon the sald Company as fully and amply to all intents and purposes, as If the same had been duty executed and acknowledged by thtskregularty, elected ofcem at their principal office in Long Grove, Ittnois. _ THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERNU ATE WTTHOLIT NOTICE AS OF December 31, 2001 This Power of Attorney ts executed by authority of resolutions adopted by Oa Executive Cormhtttess of the Boards of Directors of the Company on February 23. 1988 at Chicago, Mnols. true and accurate copies of which are hereinafter set forth and are hereby cer"ed to by the undersigned Secretary as being In Rib force and effect 'VOTED, That the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President. or their appointees designated in writing and died with the Secretary, or the Secretary shad have the power and authority to appoint agents and atbrtheys In fact and to ou&4rtze diem to execute on behalf of the Company. and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings. rocognhances, contracts of khderrnity, and other writings, obligatory In the nature thereof, and any such often of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process.' This Power of Attorney La signed, sealed and certified by facsimile under and by autharfty of the following resolution adopted by the Executive Corunittee of the Boards of Directors of the Company at a meeting duty called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: 'VOTED. That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President. arry Vice President or their appointees designated In wrlting and flied with the Secretary. and the signature of the Secretary. the seal of the Company. and certifications by the Secretary, may be afftxed by facsimile on any power of attomey or bond executed pursuant to resoiutlon adopted by the Executive Cci mdttee of the Board of Dkecticrs on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certfed with reaped to any bond or undertaking to which It is attached. shad continue to be valid and binding upon the Company.' In Testimony Whereof, the Company has caused this Instrument to be signed and their corporate seats to be affixed by their authortzed officers, this July 7, 2000. Attested and Certified: Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company American Motorists Insurance Company American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company n y� I �t �o t u ww y i shit T },f(prn{0 r"'r .,�• '�-.. a .,. rn Robert P. Homes, SecreUry by J. S. Kemper. III, Exec.Vlce President CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of County of On&a_,< V 2�07 Z-00/ before me, BLit Date Name and The of ONker ' ( ,'Jane Doe, Notary Public') personally appeared a Nam el S"'. _vpersonally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the bas s of satisfactory evidence to be the persons) OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ i Corporate Officer Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited Attorney -in -Fact Trustee ❑ General Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: ❑ El El Individual Corporate Officer Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Attorney -in -Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER .. Y ro> immn • ee.,e nemmel Ave . FU. UOX 1184 • Danoga Fark. CA 9180&7184 Prod. N. 5907 ReOnle, Call TON -Free 1 800- e]6682] whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his/her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by 6Ai ?ARA -__ 3'-ASE his/her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), _y COmmiSS'O., ='1145508 °,o P, c.` -`-� - tY C °r o ni° or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, - Son 7�,c County ir executed the instrument. My Corrr^. =xo'rlm Jul 3, 2001111 WITNESS my hand and official seal. Sgnalure d Notary PuMw OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ i Corporate Officer Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited Attorney -in -Fact Trustee ❑ General Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: ❑ El El Individual Corporate Officer Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Attorney -in -Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER .. Y ro> immn • ee.,e nemmel Ave . FU. UOX 1184 • Danoga Fark. CA 9180&7184 Prod. N. 5907 ReOnle, Call TON -Free 1 800- e]6682] April 18, 2001 SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT 505 S. VULCAN AVENUE (760) 633 -2650 P.O. BOX 231010 FAX (760) 633 -2627 ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 -3633 T00 (760) 633 -271)0 Western Utilities P.O. Box 1164 Lakeside, CA 92040 Re: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Water Materials - 1" Submittal To Whom It May Concern : The accompanying submittal data has been reviewed and compared with the requirements of the Plans and Specifications. Corrections or comments here do not relieve the contractor from compliance with the requirements of the drawings and specifications. The contractor is responsible for confirming and correlating all quantities and dimensions, processes and techniques of construction, and of performing his work in a safe manner in compliance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. Items included in this submittal are listed noting the action taken and recommendations given and are reviewed for general conformance to the project design and in general compliance with the specifications. PVC Pipe — Class 200 PVC pipe by J -M Pipe is acceptable. 2. Ductile Iron Fittings — Fittings by Sigma are acceptable. 3. Gate Valve— Valves by AVK are acceptable as submitted. 4. Locating Wire — Locating wive must be insulated. Rejected — resubmit. 5. Service Saddle — Jones No. J -996 is acceptable. 6. 1" Corporation Stop — Use Jones No. J -3403 or approved equivalent for 1" services. Rejected — resubmit. 7. 2" Corporation Stop — Jones J -1935 is acceptable. 8. 1" Curb Stop — Jones J -1527 is not acceptable. Use Jones J -1963W or equivalent. Rejected — resubmit. 9. 2" Curb Stop — Jones J -1527 is not acceptable. Use J -1974W or equivalent. Rejected — resubmit. 10. Meter Bushings — Bushings are acceptable as submitted. H. Fire Hydrant — Hydrant must have two 4" and one 2 '/2" outlet. Use Jones J -3775 or equivalent. Rejected — resubmit. `f� recycled paper 12. Prepackaged Zinc Anode — Anode by Hytech Pipeline is acceptable. 13. Ground Clamp — Clamp by Hytech Pipeline is acceptable. 14. Hydrant Bury — Hydrant bury by South Bay Foundry is acceptable provided it is cement lined and seal coated in accordance with AWWA C104, with a bituminous coating. Amend as noted. 15. 8" Valve Box Cover - SBF 1208 is acceptable provided that it is marked "San Dieguito Water District ". Amend as noted. 16. 12" Valve Box Cover - SBF 1243 is acceptable. 17. Copper Tubing — Type K "Soft" copper tubing by Mueller is acceptable. 18. Copper Fittings — Fittings by Elkhart are acceptable. 19. Double Detector Check — Wilkins Model No. 950DA is acceptable. 20. Check Valve and Fire Department Connection — These components should be approved by the Encinitas Fire Department. 21. Tapping Sleeve - Smith -Blair Tapping Sleeve No. 622 is acceptable. 22. Deflection and Repair Coupling — Couplings by CertainTeed are acceptable. 23. 2" Meter Box — J & R Concrete No. W6 -B is acceptable. 24. 1" Meter Box — J & R Concrete No. W4 '/2 is acceptable. In addition to the above comments, the following items also require submittal: - Pipe zone backfill material (include grab sample) - Fire hydrant extension - Non - asbestos gaskets Bolts and nuts Valve casing material If you have any questions, please call me at (760)633 -2849. Sincerely, (,_.J _ o William O'Donnell Water Utility Planner cc: Alex Long, SDWD Inspector Greg Shields, City of Encinitas GO APOI��A TION V General Engineering Contractor Specializing in Underground Utilities (619) 579 -6500 E/ectrlc • Telco Street Light Systems Pdy Gas Installation Scott Hambright Lic. 6488153 Foreman 697 GREENFIELD DRIVE • EL CAJON, CA 92021 -2983 ENQINEERING DEPARTMENT APPUCANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME I APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT NUMBER RECEIPT NUMBER ice CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INiTALS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER AgreemenUCovenant AC 1 01-0000 - 345-01 00 Construction CN 101-0000- 345 -0200 Exempt Organizations EX 101-0000 - 345 -0400 Grading Plancheck GR 1014000 - 345 -0700 Grading Inspection GI 101 -0000 -345 -0800 Final Map Processing FM 1D14000- 345-0500 r 1 Parcel Map Processing PM 101 - 0000 -345 -0600 Permanent Encroachment3m _ 1 PE 101-0000-345-1100 wee IR 101 -0000 - 34 500 09 Improvement Plancheck Improvement inspection II 101-0000 - 3451000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101 - 0004345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101.0000- 345-1500 Street Name Change SN 101-0000-345-1300 A.P_N. Report PN 101 - 0004345-2100 SBasrtty Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL Permit Coordinator ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSIT ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT AD DRESS PERMR COORDINATOR TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE - ED 2ROJECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED NTO PROJECT NUMBER FIELD ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE a SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST I BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (FID ON LAST SCREEN) TOTAL I I TOTAL NOTICE OF VIOLATION STOP /CORRECT WORK ' City of Encinitas • State of California Office of City Engineer Issued to:� « //✓GI t,0/1/L_0ii TuNtE This site has been inspected and is in violation of the following Chapter(s) of the Municipal Code: No Permit (15.04, 15.08, 23.24) Traffic Control (15.04) Grading (23.24) Erosion Control (23.24) Asphalt Concrete (15.04) Concrete (15.04) V Trenching and Backfilling (15.04) Drainage (15.04, 23.24) Illegal Encroachment (15.04 Other S#0121A6- � 7 /�C✓uCM SiteAddregs:� /G� �V/11� L%Ft�I��il� You are hereby or "�dyyrred to abate the following violation by: _ V,Y5i-0 4. (Date) This may be acc [shed b No P ii �t <o v�t. _/ 7E, T: c . vhN P /f17IJk,D //V kt 4 *J5, H�fNd D'(101, 55'. 'k 71JrWV.C# v`/ TH AD I/ti,,Q /A</_, r-, ,,460* 7h; Dy a t ft pcto 6w np of 1*i/y 4;uc 11- 0#e><> 0f&vT *WFU /*�v ?eZ Y , DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE! Contact project inspector regarding removal of this Notipq. /Inspector Date his U 6732-2-717 Sign -off: City Engineer Date ' ,F Projec ame: ., � NMS-(,-%2 : 0 e: 3 G Report No. LocatibW AAluthor: Day: M T W T ®S S enUCOntraet I SupVForeman: Weather: Field Supervisor: Geologist: f Soil Engineer: Observation/Testing of: Tech Equipment Working: Hours Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: r r S� AF Page _of _= `` � LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Rec a y: Prin o (� �, tic 3910 1099 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy ri.l n; Pr oje ame: roject No.: D t Report No. Loca ion: A/ Y A thor: C ay: M0 W T F S S Client/Contractor: >911 Foreman / Weather: U M. Fief Supervisor P Geologist: Soil Engineer: Observationffesting of Tech Equipment Wor g: Hours .0 Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: Page _of mz� LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Received9� / Print 7910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - ClienVAgency Copy P 'ecSName: r R31� Project No.: Date %? 4 Report No. Location: IJ�-j ' r ... Author: e,T Day: M D W T F S S ClienUCOntractor: rerpa� 114f e- Weather: Field Supervisor: Geologist OL sJ V Soil Engineer: Obse a[' n/Testing of: ` . Tech Equipme or4ing: / yrUC f' 4q7 i � n! // � Hours /' Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Opv rations: v }{_ C✓ O \ 7CT�� J� M 4 Page of LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Recei Y: e Print a PJ l e4 99101098 White - Fi:e Co Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - ClientlAgency Copy ` I GKI Proje Name: Project No.: 2r -o3Y Days: 87T- �o/ Report No. -o cation'. ,r Author: ,77 Day: M T W T OS S (/Contractor: SupVFOre an: Weather: G r\ \ Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: Observationfresting of Tech Eqwpment Working` Hours Z, o Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: r Or . a% f Page _of M`` LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. RT DAILY FIELD REPO Rectal y: ��( Print T/ M kprq ;, 9910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy 7i P act Name Project No.: -a v D t Z Report No. Location: - Author: Day: M T T F S S n ontractor• Supt/Foreman: M. W ther: Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil En eer: Observatlon/Testin of: Equipment Working: THours Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: In Page _of �`� LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Rec his C� Print O IH 1. e a n 7910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow - Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy ' rli►' �I,r ■ � y ' ` Proney�)Name, �T Project No.: CCU Z� Date Report No. Location: u[hor: ay: W T F S S Client/Contractor: Supt/Fo eman: Weather: tt-m iv, Field upervisor: Geoll pqo st: l,\ VLF Soil Engineer: ObservationTresting of: in Tech ' Equipment Wo king: Hours Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary o Operations: S Qom. 17 Z(O r7 ° y tav Page of 1 == LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT R ei ya�By: 'j�q Pint X910 1098 White — File Copy Yellow — Client Copy Pink — Field Copy Gold — Client/Agency Copy Projec Name: ` 'A JA P oject No.: 03 —Z-- Oat 77 Report No. Locahon: {� ¢� Author: / p y: M T W T(Y S S Client/Contractor: Supt/Foreman: Weather: Feld Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: Observation/Testing of: Tech Equipment Working: Hours Z -D Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: Y� a ` Page _of LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Rece � Print 3910 1098 White — File Copy Yellow — Client Copy Pink — Field Copy Gold — ClientlAgency Copy Project me: I Project No.: 9 L Date: Report No. Locatlon: 0. Author; C I M T T F S S Client/Contractor: X� Supt/Foreman: C Weather: Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: Observation/Testing of: Tech Equipment Working: Hours Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: t )� Q/ Page _of_ _ Mz LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Race a y: i/IVl Print M L l c a 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow- Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy Proje Narpe: -91002-6-07-)-t— Project No.: Dat J' b Report No. Lot tion: �Vt -4— Author: Day: M T WbTF S S Client/Contractor: SuptlForeman: W then. v. Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: OhservatlonlTe ting of �f •C v Tech �� C / Equipment Working: Hours Z.J Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: cr' . t Q wv�Y� Page _of �� ____ � �_- LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Receive By: �( c Print r � . /� c /`C� 3910 1098 White - File Copy Yellow- Client Copy Pink - Field Copy Gold - Client/Agency Copy Pr kect Name: Project No.: Dat Report No. Location: Author: p y; M T W ©F S S Client/Contractor: Sup Forem n: Weather: Field Supervisor: Geologist: Soil Engineer: Observation/Testing of: O Tech Equipment Working: Hours Today's Yardage: Yardage to Date: Summary of Operations: ^ CY v Page _of -�� Mz LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DAILY FIELD REPORT Raceve�%: �v Print ONE 3910 1098 White —File Copy Yellow — Client Copy Pink —Field Copy Gold — Client/Agency Copy C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 IMPROVEMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 6538II PARCEL NO. : 257- 040-4600 PLAN NO.: 638 -I JOB SITE ADDRESS: 700BLK VIA CANTEBRIA APPLICANT NAME ENCINITAS RANCH APARTMENTS LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 9823 PACIFIC HEIGHTS BLVD #J PHONE NO.: 858- 457 -435v CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: 92121 - CONTRACTOR : CORNERSTONE COMMIUNITIES CORPORATION PHONE NO.: 619- 458 -9700 LICENSE NO.: 697803 LICENSE TYPE: B INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: LEGION INDEMNITY COMPANY POLICY NO. : GL21509355 POLICY EXP. DATE: 10/15/01 ENGINEER : SAFINO- BUTCHER - ORMONDE INC. E NO.' 85E- 560 -1141 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 4/25/01 PERMIT EXP, DATE: 10 /15 /01 PERMIT ISSUED BY _ INSPECTOR: RONALD QUIGG ------------------- - - - - -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS -------- - - - - -- 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 4,600.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: 0 2. INSPECTION FEE 3, 240.00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 64,805.? 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 -- --- ------ ---- ----- - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ---- ----- ----- ---- - -- - -- EARTHWORK /CURB & GUTTER & SIDEWALK /PCC CROSS GUTTER/ FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. PCC CURB & GUTTER REMOVAL 170LF/ 6" TYPE G 140LF/ 2 PED RAMPS/ PCC CROSS GUTTER 935SF/ TRENCH RESURFACING 20OLF/ STRIPING REMOVAL & INSTALLATION 803OLF/ ARROWS 7EA/ SIGNS 3EA/ TELEPHONE PED 2EA/ IRR SYSTEM 2575SF/ 90 DAY MAINTENANCE 1LS. TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIRED. coN -rAC.T LCw f) Fb - 5E-JC�t 0,1 ?UfS( -ic j4,,POE�,J6*�E.rrs. - - -- INSPECTION -- -------- - - ---- DATE -- - - - --- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION AS- BUILTS AND ONE YEAR WARRANTY RETENTION REQUIRED. I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER. PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. SIGNATURE I . \Z IL C 0,-K o---- PR.: NT NAME 4Iz.(.. k ) _ DATE SIGNED &("7) y c 6 g'jJ x 120 TELEPHONE NUM98ER CIRCLE ONE: `l. OWNER.. 2. AGE'NT, 3. OTHER__ -_ -- -- -- - -- -- - --- .. - - -� -- - -- , SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT 505 S. VULCAN AVENUE (760) 633 -2650 P.O. BOX 231010 FAX (760) 633 -2627 ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 -3633 TDD (760) 633 -2700 April 23, 2001 Western Utilities P.O. Box 1164 Lakeside, CA 92040 Re: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Water Materials — 2nd Submittal To Whom It May Concern: The accompanying submittal data has been reviewed and compared with the requirements of the Plans and Specifications. Corrections or comments here do not relieve the contractor from compliance with the requirements of the drawings and specifications. The contractor is responsible for confirming and correlating all quantities and dimensions, processes and techniques of construction, and of performing his work in a safe manner in compliance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. Items included in this submittal are listed noting the action taken and recommendations given and are reviewed for general conformance to the project design and in general compliance with the specifications. 1. Locating Wire — Insulated wire by Baron is acceptable. 2. Fire Hydrant — Jones No. J -3775 is acceptable. 3. 2" Curb Stop — Jones No. J -1974W is acceptable. 4. 1" Curb Stop — Jones No. J -1963 W is acceptable. 5. 1" Corporation Stop — Jones No. J -3403 is acceptable. 6. 8" Valve Box Cover — South Bay Foundry No. 1208 marked "SDWD" is acceptable. In addition to the above comments, the following items also require submittal: Pipe zone backfill material (include grab sample) Fire hydrant extension Non - asbestos gaskets Bolts and nuts Valve casing material If you have any questions, please call me at (760)633 -2849. Sincerely, W 1 d c-- William O'Donnell Water Utility Planner cc: Alex Long, SDWD Inspector Greg Shields, City of Encinitas recycled paper Leighton and Associates GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS CF�br�� so �6R == 1 9 6 1 - 20 01 �%ebrativ P = F 1 9 6 1 - 2 0 0 1 Leighton and Associates GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS AS- GRADED REPORT OF ROUGH AND FINE GRADING, POINSETTIA RIDGE APARTMENTS ENCINITAS, TOWN CENTER LOT 45 ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA April 20, 2001 Project No. 940028 -032 Prepared For: CORNERSTONE COMMUNITIES 4365 Executive Drive, Suite 600 San Diego, California 92121 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, #8205, San Diego, CA 92123 -4425 (858) 292 -8030 • FAX (858) 292 -0771 • www.leightongeo.com �ubraeilr8 0 e P 1 9 6 1 - 2 0 0 1 To: Attention: Subject: Introduction Leighton and Associates April 20, 2001 Cornerstone Communities 4365 Executive Drive, Suite 600 San Diego, California 92121 Mr. Jack Robson GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Pro ject No. 940028 -032 As- Graded Report of Rough and Fine Grading, Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Encinitas Town Center, Lot 45, Encinitas, California In accordance with your request and authorization, we have performed geotechnical observation and testing services during rough and fine grading operations for Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Encinitas Town Center Lot 45, Encinitas, California. Grading operations for the site were performed by Perry & Shaw under the observation and testing of Leighton and Associates, Inc. This as- graded report of rough and fine grading summarizes our geotechnical observations, geologic mapping, field and laboratory test results and the geotechnical conditions encountered during rough and fine grading operations for the Poinsettia Ridge Apartments development. In addition, this report provides conclusions and recommendations for the proposed post grading and residential development of the site. As of this date, rough and fine grading operations are essentially complete for the site. Project Description The proposed development is planned within Lot 45 of the Encinitas Town Center development. The site is located west of the intersectionof Garden View Road and Via Cantebria in Encinitas, California (Figure 1, page 2). The site is bounded by an undeveloped natural hillside to the west, Via Cantebria to the southeast and Garden View Road to the northeast. Site development will ultimately include the construction of a three -story residential -type structure with one level of partially below -grade parking, street level retail space, a single -story recreation/leasing building, at -grade parking areas, driveways, landscaping and associated improvements. 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, 118205, San Diego, CA 92123 -4425 (858) 292 -8030 • FAX (858) 292 -0771 • www.lelghtongeo.com tl � y�•' _ ►, F E BASE MAP : Thomas Bros. GenFinde.r for Windows, San Diego County, 1995, Page 1147 0 1000 2000 4000 1 "= 2,000' M � Crnlu in Fncf SITE Project No. Poinsettia Ridge Apartments 940028 -032 Lot 45 MR Encinitas Town Center LOCATION Date Encinitas. California MAP April 2001 Figure No. 1 940028 -032 Previous Site Grading The site was previously mass graded during grading operations for the Encinitas Town Center development (Leighton, 1996). Removal of potentially compressible soils reached a maximum depth of 40 feet on the site in a canyon cleanout in the northern portion of the site. The bedrock soils on the site were overexcavated to reduce future fill differentials on the lot and to supply export soils to other portions of the Encinitas Town Center development. On -site fill soils were placed under the observation and testing of Leighton and Associates and range from 5 to 40 feet in thickness across the site. The majority of the 2:1 slope on the west side of the lot was constructed as a replacement fill slope with the exception of the southern approximately 200 feet which was constructed as a 2:1 cut slope. A subdrain was placed below the toe of the fill slope and drains in a northerly direction where it has been outletted into the storm drain system north of the site in Garden View Road. Summary of Rough and Fine Grading Operations The recent rough and fine grading operations for Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Encinitas Town Center, Lot 45 began in December 2000 and are essentially complete as of the date of this report. The rough and fine grading of the development was performed by Perry & Shaw and the Keystone wall construction was performed by Geogrid Retaining Wall Systems Inc., with geotechnical observation and testing services provided by Leighton and Associates, Inc. Our field technician and field geologist were onsite full -time and part-time, respectively, during the grading operations. The rough and fine grading operations performed on Lot 45 of Encinitas Town Center included: 1) excavation of the apartment building parking basement; 2) excavation, construction and backfill of Keystone Retaining Wall on the west side of the site; 3) scarification of the existing fill soils to a minimum depth of 6 inches; 4) moisture conditioning of the in- place fill soils to near optimum moisture conditions and recompaction of the soils at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1557); 5) placement and compaction of fill soils to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1557). Field density testing was performed using the Nuclear-Gauge Method (ASTM Test Methods D2922 and D3017). The approximate test locations are shown on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map (Plate l). The results of the field density tests are summarized in Appendix B, Summary of Field Density Tests. The field testing performed was in general accordance with the applicable ASTM Standards, the current standard of care in the industry, and the precision of the testing method itself. As with all field and laboratory testing methods, variations in relative compaction of the fill and backfill should be expected from the results documented herein due to the differences in grading methods and in the precision of the test methods themselves. Laboratory testing including maximum dry density, soluble sulfate content, direct shear, and expansion potential tests were also performed (Appendix C, Laboratory Testing Procedures and Test Results). Based on our observationand testing during the rough and fine grading operations,the following items were noted: • Site Preparation Prior to the placement of fill, the upper 6- inches of all soils in areas to receive fill were scarified, moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture, and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D 1557). 1 1 3 �� 940028 -032 • Keystone Retaining Walls Two Keystone retaining walls were constructed on the west side of the site under the observation and testing of Leighton and Associates. Prior to the construction of the Keystone retaining walls, footing excavations for Walls 1 and 2 were observed by a Leighton representative. The approximate footing depth of the wall excavation is a minimum of 18 inches per the recommendations of Landmark Engineering (Landmark Engineering, 2000). In general, wall footing excavations were observed and found to be consistent with design recommendations. Areas that did not appear competent were removed and recompacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM D1557- 96). Keystone Retaining Wall Construction Operations The Keystone Retaining Wall construction operations at Walls 1 and 2 were in general compliance with City of Encinitas special inspection requirements including International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) Evaluation Report, ER -4599. Inspection services included monitoring foundation and reinforced fill soils, compacted lift thickness, and compaction procedures. Special inspections for geogrid also includes verification of proper geogrid placement with respect to type, elevation and fill placement. Subdrain installation operations were in general compliance with Landmark and Leighton recommendations. The subdrains constructed behind Retaining Walls 1 and 2 consisted of 4 -inch diameter perforated PVC pipe surrounded by 3/4 inch crushed gravel wrapped in geotextile filter fabric. In addition, two panel drains were constructed at two locations where minor ground water seepage was encountered along the wall backcut. The panel drains were constructed approximately south of wall station nos. 3 +80 and 4 +24 and tied into a subdmin (constructed of 4 -inch diameter perforated PVC pipe surrounded by 3/4 inch crushed gravel wrapped in geotextile filter fabric) placed along the base of the backcut between the two panels. The wall subdrains were outletted at the north and south end of Retaining Wall 1 and at the locations of the proposed catch basins at station nos. 4 +13 and 6 +39. The subdrain outlets are to be tied into the storm drain to be constructed east of the retaining wall. As of the date of this report the subdrains outlets have not been tied into the site storm drain. Above and adjacent to the subdrains, compacted fill was placed to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM D1557 -96). Compaction test results are presented in Appendix B and their approximate locations shown on the attached As- Graded Geotechnical Map (Plate 1). The locations of field density tests are referenced from wall station numbers provided by Landmark Engineering, Inc. (Landmark, 2000). In summary, based on our observations during the Keystone retaining wall construction operations, we provide the following conclusions: - Footing excavations are in general accordance with the design engineer's recommendations (Landmark, 2000) and Leighton recommendations for foundation embedment and bearing capacity. 1 4 Oak 940028 -032 - Keystone retaining wall construction was found in general compliance with the Evaluation Report for Keystone block units -ICBO ER -4599, and geogrid reinforcement installation. - Soil conditions were generally as anticipated in our geotechnical investigation report (Leighton, 2000). - Field density testing indicated that the wall backfill soils were compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1557-96). - The Keystone retaining wall foundation and subdrain were constructed in accordance with Landmark Engineering and Leighton recommendations. Subdrains should be tied into the site storm drainage system at the earliest possible convenience to reduce the potential for ponding of water near the outlet. It is the responsibility of the general contractor Cornerstone Communities, to insure and document that the subdrains are properly connected to the site Storm Drain system. - The retaining wall backfill soils were tested and found to meet or exceed the unit weight and friction angle (phi-angle) requirements per the project plans. • Fill Placement After processing the areas to receive fill (i.e., site preparation), on -site soil was generally spread in 6- to 8 -inch loose lifts, moisture conditioned as needed to attain near optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Method D 1557. Compaction was achieved by use of heavy construction equipment. • Field Density Testing Field density testing and observations were performed by a field technician using the Nuclear-Gauge Method (ASTM Test Methods D2922 and D3017). The results and approximate test locations of the field density tests are summarized in Appendix B and shown on Plate 1. When field testing indicated less than 90 percent relative compaction or significantly less than optimum moisture content, the pertinent fill soils were reworked and further moisture conditioned (if needed) until the recommended compaction was achieved. The field testing performed was in general accordance with the applicable ASTM Standards, the current standard of care in the industry, and the precision of the testing method itself. Variations in relative compaction of the fill and backfill should be expected from the results documented herein. • Laboratory Testina Laboratory maximum dry density tests of representative on -site soils were performed in general accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557. Expansion potential and soluble sulfate content tests of representative finish grade soils were performed in accordance with ASTM Test Method D4829 and standard geochemical methods, respectively. The laboratory test results indicate the building pad finish grade soils possess a very low to medium expansion potential and a negligible to moderate soluble sulfate content. The test results are presented in Appendix C. 5 �� GIIrIrIr.F:i MPI • Ground Water Minor ground water seepage was encountered during retaining wall backcut excavation for the Keystone retaining wall on the western portion of the site. The seepage was encountered in approximately the central portion of the backcut and at its southern end. As discussed above, the seepage conditions were mitigated by construction of subdrain systems at these locations. Summary of Conclusions The rough and fine grading operations for Poinsettia Ridge Apartments appear to have been performed in general accordance with the project geotechnical reports (Leighton, 1996 and 2000), geotechnical recommendations made during rough and fine grading, and the City of Encinitas requirements. It is our opinion that the subject site is suitable for its intended residential/commercial use provided the recommendations included herein and in the project geotechnical report are incorporated into the design and construction of the proposed structure and associated improvements. The following is a summary of our conclusions concerning the rough and fine grading of the subject site: • Geotechnical conditions encountered during rough and fine grading were generally as anticipated. Based on our review of the grading operations, the geotechnical aspects of the site were addressed in general accordancewith the requirementsof the City of Encinitas and standard practices in the industry. • Fill soils were derived from on site and imported materials. Our field density testing indicates the fill soils were placed and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1557) and near optimum moisture content in accordance with the project recommendations and the requirementsof the City of Encinitas. • The Keystone retaining walls on the west portion of the site were constructed and backfilled in general accordance with project recommendations and the requirementsof the City of Encinitas. • No landslidesor evidence of landslidingwas observed on the site duringthe grading operations. • Minor ground water seepage was encountered in the retaining wall backcut and at the southern end of the retaining wall along the western side of the site. Subdrain systems were recommended and constructed at both locations to mitigate the seepage conditions. In addition, unanticipated seepage conditions may occur after the completion of grading. These conditions usually occur due to site irrigation and landscaping. If these conditions should occur, steps to mitigate the seepage should be made by the on a case -by -case basis. • The expansion potential of the finish grade soils (i.e. soils within approximately 5 feet of building pad subgrade) was tested and found to range from very low to medium. The laboratory tests results are presented in Appendix C. Specific recommendations concerning the foundation design of the proposed buildings are presented in our previous report for the site are still considered pertinent and applicable the development of the site (Leighton, 2000). • Soluble sulfate content tests of representative finish grade soils indicate the soils possess negligible to moderate concentrations of soluble sulfates (per UBC 1997, Section 19 -A -4). Therefore, the potential for soluble sulfate attack (on Type I /11 cement) of the finish grade soils is considered minor based on � 1 6 �� iilrz�y�:a��a the UBC criteria (UBC, 1997). The soluble sulfate content test results are included as part of the Appendix C and should be supplied to the concrete contractor to mitigate the effects of the soluble sulfates in the onsite soils. Recommendations Based on the results of our observation and testing during the fine grading of the site conditions were essentially as anticipated. Therefore, the recommendations concerning the post grading and construction phases of the project presented in our geotechnical report for the site (Leighton, 2000) are still considered applicable, and should be adhered to during future site post grading and development of the site. If you have any questions regarding our report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTONANDASSOCIATES,/ R. • = CERTIFIED � O GINEERIPIG d� DEOLOrz!ST Michael R. Stew az , 1349 illiam D. Olson, RCE 45283 Vice President/PrincipalGeologist OfC:'40Q Senior Project Engineer Q�iOFESS10Nq ti`"Q4O. \PM D. 0<<I Attachments: Figure 1 -Site Location Map -Page 2 i? 3 No. 45283 a m Plate I - As-Graded Geotechnical Map c EXp. 9 iv r Appendix A - References AppendixB - Summary ofFieldDensity Tests r�q CIVIL Appendix C - Laboratory Testing Procedures and Test Results lF �F CAL�F� Distribution: (6) Addressee -7- ± a AS-GRADED GEOTECHNICAL MAP Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Encinitas, California PLATE I woo K ............ Lee.-; "a v _IF _5 LEGEND Oft N Af GEOLOGIC KNITS y Af :...,,.<.'.;;. ... 11 1*11111" Of s d Afo Tt *Y 0 Ille ae!Rme' Ow n is 1A k 14 4 7. x "t /�v 4-Z �IJli 1 Af V, 4. "A a Af 0,,t 401, 0 a& .d, "e, V� 17 A' .d d "'R . — "I WE A� I;pl"� 1� At' Z, 1— .1 11d dlly I- '01flU7 /111 1 Afp zo W Y" ,V=Tl N, N b), A", J2— G M+BIF^" , J '"�: Aft, ��'`�u: ' eu j fY+ `'m�a, y;y "T /X'� / I'm W ACH MN 4�" i6a we mme lAC4WY am Kwsmm. Ar*IW REM#W AXAt qqi� leas' A ov?w 14 Xr nmw _mwam- Ix f 11 #1~ wmwmwv Rwvvn ev row A-Y3 mw mm aww Im w-s� me #,I"ww Aw~ ff ffar. oftk 10 V �l Am R.- F.' "S q �`_` _� ��.... .. .� W `.,,. \ '..,,��° ". `', \.`' ..,. f� ]ray �S. X45 9 P mminer "J� rotowyw. v-l* �f4x w Av w Afo At AAV "WMV "Iff yo wAkWov txmxm*� to 6mmmot A Xlev" _`\ �Affl S�PZVON CEWERUXE #A re MW n"'S oVW W M400ft ON RA4 V W,7 77 ;j VORM DAWN PAM U&C g� Or XOff Ar TYMCA4 _WSr ON ".,w.25 vAm wr Y i APPRO,W.S DRAVONG NU: y 111C IINIII_ I A �s Me, IPLANS PREPARED UNDFR E SJ" OYCINIUS RANCH A POINSEM rms A PAVE APARMEMIS m Ul I" arralxe A f� i 940028 -032 APPENDIX A International Conference of Building Officials, 1994, Uniform Building Code. International Conference of Building Officials, 1997, Uniform Building Code. Leighton and Associates, 1996, As- Graded Report of Rough- Grading, Via Cantebria, Leucadia Boulevard, Garden View Road and Lots 44 and 45, Encinitas Ranch Phase 1, Encinitas, California, Project No. 940028 -006, dated November 8, 1996. , 2000, Update Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, Encinitas Town Center Lot 45, Encinitas, California, Project No. 940028 -029, dated April 26, 2000. Landmark Engineering, 2000, Keystone Retaining Wall Plans for: Encinitas Ranch Poinsettia Ridge Apartments, sheets 5 through 8 of 8, scale: 1 " =6', dated September 27, 2000. FEW :Slrri� _t rT�7 APPENDIX B, SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS EXPLANATIONOF ABBREVIATIONS Fest No. Test of Test No. "Pest of Prefix nest of Abbreviations Prefix Test of Abbreviations (nonc) (TRADING Natural Ground NG (SG) SUBGRADE Original Ground OG (AB) AGGREGATE BASE Existing Fill EF (CB) CEMENT TREATED BASE Compacted Fill CF (PB) PROCESSED BASE Slope Face SF (AC) ASPHALT CONCRETE Finish (Trade FG Curb C (S) SEWER (SD) STORM DRAIN Gutter G (AD) AREA DRAIN Curb and Gutter CG (W) DOMESTIC WATER Cross Gutter XG (RC) RECLAIMED WATER Street ST (SB) SUBDRAIN Sidewalk SW (G) GAS Driveway D (E) ELECTRICAL Driveway Approach DA (T) TELEPHONE Parking Lot PL (1) JOINT UTILITY Electric Box Pad EB (1) IRRIGATION Bedding Material 13 Shading Sand S Main M Lateral L Crossing X Manhole MH Hydrant Lateral HL Catch Basin CB Riser R Inlet I (RW) RETAINING WALL (P) PRESATURATION (CW) CRIB WALL (LW) LOFFELL WALL Moisture Content 11 (SF) STRUCf FOOTING Footing Bottom P Backfill It Wall Cell c' (IT) INTERIOR TRENCH Plumbing Backfill P Electrical Backfill E N represents nuclear gauge tests that acre perforated in general accordance �%ah most recent version of ASTM Test Methods D2922 and D3017. S represents sand cone tests that were performed in general accordance with most recent version of ASTM Test Method D1556. 15A represents first retest of Test No. 15 15B represents second retest of Test No. 15 "0" in Test Elevation Column represents test was taken at the ground surface (e.g. finish grade or subgtade) " -l" in Test Elevation Column represents test was taken one foot below the ground surface SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Test No. Test Date Test Location Of Test Lot # Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture ( %) Field Opt. Relative ( %) Compaction Remarks 1 12119/00 CF Recreation Center 205.1 1 114.8 127.0 11.4 10.0 90 2 12/19/00 CF Recreation Center 206.0 1 114.6 127.0 10.2 10.0 90 3 12/19/00 CF SW of Rec. Center 208.0 1 115.2 127.0 13.9 10.0 91 4 12 /19 /00 CF Recreation Center 207.0 2 108.9 1 18.5 14.5 12.5 92 5 12/19/00 CF Recreation Center 206.0 1 115.6 127.0 9.9 10.0 91 6 12/19/00 CF W. of Rec. Center 208.0 2 110.2 118.5 12.6 12.5 93 7 12/20/00 CF Recreation Center 207.0 2 109.0 1 18.5 15.4 12.5 92 8 12/20/00 CF Recreation Center 207.0 2 110.4 118.5 14.1 12.5 93 9 12120/00 CF Recreation Center 208.0 2 107.7 1 18.5 13.5 12.5 91 10 12/20/00 CF Recreation Center 209.0 2 107.4 118.5 12.5 12.5 91 11 12/21/00 CF W. of Rec. Center 210.0 2 109.1 118.5 13.8 12.5 92 12 12/21/00 CF Recreation Center 210.0 2 106.9 118.5 12.3 12.5 90 13 12/21/00 CF S. of Rec. Center 211.0 2 110.4 118.5 10.8 12.5 93 14 12/21/00 CF N. of Rec. Center 209.0 2 108.6 118.5 13.1 12.5 92 15 12/21/00 CF Recreation Center 212.0 2 107.3 118.5 13.6 12.5 91 16 12/22/00 CF S. of Rec. Center 212.0 2 108.0 118.5 13.9 12.5 91 17 12/22/00 CF N. of Rec. Center 212.0 2 109.3 118.5 14.4 12.5 92 18 12/22/00 CF Recreation Center 213.0 2 107.9 118.5 12.9 12.5 91 19 12/22/00 CF N. of Rec. Center 214.0 2 108.3 118.5 14.0 12.5 91 20 12 /26/00 CF Recreation Center 214.0 2 109.9 118.5 12.0 12.5 93 21 12 /26/00 CF N. of Rec. Center 212.0 2 110.4 118.5 13.6 12.5 93 22 12 /26/00 CF Drive SE of Recreation Center 211.0 2 108.8 118.5 11.6 12.5 92 23 12127/00 CF Drive N. of Recreation Center 206.0 2 110.1 118.5 12.9 12.5 93 24 12127100 CF Drive N. of Recreation Center 208.0 2 109.6 118.5 12.0 12.5 92 25 12/27/00 FG Recreation Center 215.0 2 112.3 118.5 13.1 12.5 95 26 12 /27/00 FG W. of Rec. Center 215.0 2 110.9 118.5 12.8 12.5 94 27 3123/01 CF Desilting Basin 197.0 1 115.6 127.0 13.0 10.0 91 28 3 /23/01 CF Desilting Basin 199.0 1 1 17.2 127.0 12.7 10.0 92 29 3 /23/01 CF Desilting Basin 201.0 1 114.7 127.0 11.9 10.0 90 30 3 /23/01 FG North side of pad 204.3 1 119.6 127.0 12.2 10.0 94 Project Number: 940028 -032 Project Name: ETC/Lot 45 ` Project Location: 0 Client: 0 Page 1 of 5 Leighton and Associates, Inc SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS eighton and Associates, Inc Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Test Lot 4 Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture ( %) Field Opt. Relative ( %) Compaction Remarks 31 3/23/01 FG North side of pad 204.3 1 120.4 127.0 10.2 10.0 95 32 3/23/01 FG North side of pad 204.3 2 109.4 118.5 11.2 12.5 92 33 3/23/01 FG South end of pad 204.3 1 121.7 127.0 12.1 10.0 96 34 3/23/01 FG South end of pad 204.3 2 112.0 118.5 12.1 12.5 95 35 3/23/01 FG South end of pad 204.3 1 118.4 127.0 11.5 10.0 93 36 3/23/01 FG South end of pad 204.3 2 109.3 118.5 12.3 12.5 92 RW 1 1/18/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 8 +30 207.0 3 116.8 128.0 11.4 8.5 91 RW 2 1/18/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 8+05 208.0 3 116.7 128.0 11.9 8.5 91 RW 3 1/19/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 8 +25 209.0 3 116.9 128.0 11.9 8.5 91 RW 4 1/19/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 7 +30 210.5 3 117.4 128.0 12.6 8.5 92 RW 5 1/19/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 8+00 210.5 3 116.3 128.0 11.8 8.5 91 RW 6 1/22/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 7 +85 212.5 3 116.5 128.0 12.5 8.5 91 RW 7 122/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 7 +20 213.5 3 1 17.7 128.0 12.0 8.5 92 RW 8 1/22/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 7 +50 214.5 3 117.3 128.0 11.9 8.5 92 RW 9 1/22/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 6 +60 214.5 3 116.8 128.0 11.5 8.5 91 RW 10 1/23/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 5 +50 214.0 3 116.7 128.0 11.4 8.5 91 RW 11 123/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 7+65 216.0 3 1 12.3 128.0 12.0 8.5 88 Retest on 11A RW 11A 123/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 7 +65 216.0 3 116,5 128.0 11.8 8.5 91 Retest of 11 RW 12 123/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 5 +15 216.0 3 117.1 128.0 10.9 8.5 91 RW 13 124/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 7 +85 217.0 3 116.6 128.0 11.5 8.5 91 RW 14 1/24/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 7 +10 217.0 3 118.3 128.0 10.4 8.5 92 RW 15 1/24/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 6 +10 217.0 3 116.7 128.0 11.4 8.5 91 RW 16 1/24/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 4 +50 217.0 3 1 15.9 128.0 12.6 8.5 91 RW 17 1/24/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 3 +70 217.0 3 1 16.8 128.0 11.3 8.5 91 RW 18 1/24/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 2 +70 216.0 3 117.9 128.0 10.6 8.5 92 RW 19 125/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 7 +15 218.5 3 1 19.2 128.0 9.7 8.5 93 RW 20 125/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 6 +60 218.5 3 116.9 128.0 11.3 8.5 91 RW 21 125/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 5 +60 218.5 3 1 16.3 128.0 12.0 8.5 91 RW 22 125/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 5 +00 218.5 3 1 17.7 128.0 10.5 8.5 92 RW 23 125/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 2 +30 218.5 3 117.4 128.0 10.7 8.5 92 Project Number: 940028 -032 Project Name: ETC /Lot 45 Project Location: 0 Client: 0 Page 2 of 5 eighton and Associates, Inc SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS eighton and Associates, Inc Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Test Soil Lot # Elev (ft) Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture ( %) Field Opt. Relative ( %) Compaction Remarks RW 24 1/26/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 7 +50 220.5 3 117.6 128.0 10.4 8.5 92 RW 25 1/29/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 7 +35 221.0 3 116.6 128.0 11.5 8.5 91 RW 26 1/29/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 6 +30 218.5 3 117.2 128.0 10.9 8.5 92 RW 27 1/29/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 3 +00 218.5 3 116.4 128.0 11.8 8.5 91 RW 28 1/29/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 5 +40 220.5 3 116.3 128.0 11.9 8.5 91 RW 29 1/29/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 3 +90 220.5 3 117.0 128.0 11.3 8.5 91 RW 30 1/29/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 2 +65 221.0 3 116.8 128.0 11.7 8.5 91 RW 31 1/29101 B Retaining Wall I Station 1 +90 221.0 3 117.1 128.0 11.3 8.5 91 RW 32 1/30/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 5 +85 222.0 3 118.3 128.0 9.9 8.5 92 RW 33 1/30/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 4 +50 222.0 3 116.7 128.0 11.8 8.5 91 RW 34 1/30/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 3 +20 222.0 3 116.6 128.0 11.6 8.5 91 RW 35 1/30/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 1 +80 222.5 3 116.4 128.0 11.7 8.5 91 RW 36 1/30/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 5 +25 223.0 3 119.0 128.0 9.4 8.5 93 RW 37 1/30/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 3 +70 222.5 3 116.8 128.0 11.4 8.5 91 RW 38 1/30/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 2 +I0 223.0 3 117.5 128.0 10.8 8.5 92 RW 39 1 /30/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 5 +50 224.5 3 117.5 128.0 10.6 8.5 92 RW 40 1 131/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 2 +55 224.5 3 118.3 128.0 9.8 8.5 92 RW 41 1131/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 4 +60 225.0 3 116.9 128.0 11.2 8.5 91 RW 42 2/1/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 5 +75 226.5 3 117.6 128.0 10.8 8.5 92 RW 43 2/1/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 4 +70 226.0 3 116.4 128.0 12.0 8.5 91 RW 44 2/1/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 5 +15 227.0 3 117.2 128.0 11.4 8.5 92 RW 45 2/2/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 4 +80 228.0 3 1 16.9 128.0 12.1 8.5 91 RW 46 2/2/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 1 +31 219.0 1 113.9 127.0 11.3 10.0 90 RW 47 2/2/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 5+00 229.0 1 115.6 127.0 11.8 10.0 91 RW 48 2/5/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 5 +20 230.0 1 116.8 127.0 12.1 10.0 92 RW 49 2/5/01 B Retaining Wall Station 4 +90 232.0 1 115.1 127.0 11.2 10.0 91 RW 50 2/5/01 B Slope behind RW I Station 7 +35 224.0 3 115.8 128.0 7.1 8.5 90 RW 51 2/6/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 2 +15 224.5 4 116.5 127.5 10.7 9.5 91 RW 52 2/6/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 1 +45 222.5 4 118.3 127.5 11.0 9.5 93 RW 53 2/6/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 1 +75 224.0 4 115.3 127.5 11.8 9.5 90 Project Number: 940028 -032 Project Name: ETC /Lot 45 Project Location: 0 Client: 0 Page 3 of 5 eighton and Associates, Inc SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS ighton and Associates, Inc Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Test Lot # Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture (%) Field Opt. Relative ( %) Compaction Remarks RW 54 2/6/01 B Retaining Wall I Station 1 +25 225.0 4 117.1 127.5 10.4 9.5 92 RW 55 2/6/01 B Retaining Wall 2 Station 3 +60 224.5 4 116.0 127.5 10.8 9.5 91 RW 56 2/6/01 B Retaining Wall 2 Station 2 +70 226.0 4 118.6 127.5 11.4 9.5 93 RW 57 2/6/01 B Retaining Wall 2 Station 3 +25 226.0 4 116.9 127.5 10.2 9.5 92 RW 58 2/7/01 B Retaining Wall 2 Station 2 +30 226.5 4 116.3 127.5 10.7 9.5 91 RW 59 2/7/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 1+45 227.5 4 117.2 127.5 10.9 9.5 92 RW 60 2/7/01 B Retaining Wall 1 Station 1 +20 230.0 4 1 16.3 127.5 11.3 9.5 91 RW 61 2/7/01 B Retaining Wall 2 Station 2 +75 228.5 5 126.6 139.5 7.8 6.5 91 RW 62 2/7/01 B Retaining Wall 2 Station 3 +55 228.0 5 128.1 139.5 7.2 6.5 92 RW 63 2/7/01 B Retaining Wall 2 Station 2 +60 230.5 5 125.9 139.5 7.0 6.5 90 RW 64 2/7/01 B Retaining Wall 2 Station 2 +10 230.5 4 1 17.4 127.5 11.0 9.5 92 RW 65 2/8/01 B Retaining Wall 2 Station 2 +45 232.0 1 116.9 127.0 11.3 10.0 92 RW 66 2/8/01 B Retaining Wall Station 1 +65 232.5 1 115.7 127.0 10.6 10.0 91 RW 67 2/8/01 B Slope behind RWI Station 4 +10 227.0 6 104.8 116.0 14.6 15.5 90 RW 68 2/8/01 B Slope behind RWI Station 6 +40 222.0 6 106.1 116.0 15.3 15.5 91 RW 69 2/8/01 B Slope behind RWI Station 4 +30 228.0 6 108.8 116.0 16.2 15.5 94 RW 70 2/8/01 B Retaining Wall 2 Staiton 1+60 234.5 1 116.1 127.0 11.9 10.0 91 RW 71 2/8/01 B Retaining Wall 2 Staiton 1 +30 235.0 1 115.2 127.0 12.4 10.0 91 RW 72 2/9/01 B Retaining Wall 2 Staiton 1 +35 237.0 1 118.0 127.0 11.4 10.0 93 RW 73 2/12/01 B Slope Behind RW l Station 6 +55 225.0 6 107.7 116.0 15.9 15.5 93 RW 74 2/12/01 B Slope behind RW 1 Station 7 +50 228.0 6 105.6 116.0 15.1 15.5 91 RW 75 2/12/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 3 +90 228.5 6 106.8 116.0 15.7 15.5 92 RW 76 2/12/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 4+05 229.0 6 106.1 116.0 16.8 15.5 91 RW 77 2/14/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 4 +10 230.0 6 105.8 116.0 18.5 15.5 91 RW 78 2/14/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 2 +85 234.0 6 108.4 116.0 17.6 15.5 93 RW 79 2/14/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 3 +40 232.0 6 105.6 116.0 18.1 15.5 91 RW 80 2/15/01 B Slope behind RW 1 Station 8 +15 220.0 6 104.5 116.0 16.7 15.5 90 RW 81 2/15/01 B Slope behind RW 1 Station 7 +45 229.0 6 104.7 116.0 19.5 15.5 90 RW 82 2/15/01 B Slope behind RW I Station 7 +90 223.0 6 107.5 116.0 18.0 15.5 93 RW 83 2/15/01 B Slope behind RW I Station 7 +65 232.0 6 106.6 116.0 18.3 15.5 92 ect Number: 940028 -032 [P'O' Project Name: ETC /Lot 45 Project Location: 0 Client: 0 Page 4 of 5 ighton and Associates, Inc SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS etghton and Associates, Inc Test No. Test Date Test Of Location Test Lot # Elev (ft) Soil Type Dry Density Field Max Moisture ( %) Field Opt. Relative ( %) Compaction Remarks RW 84 2/15/01 B Slope behind RW 1 Station 7 +50 235.0 6 105.9 116.0 18.8 15.5 91 RW 85 2/15/01 B Slope behind RW 1 Station 6+05 227.0 6 106.8 116.0 17.8 15.5 92 RW 86 2/15/01 B Slope behind RW I Station 4 +50 232.0 6 105.4 116.0 18.2 15.5 91 RW 87 2/15/01 B Slope behind RW 1 Station 5 +50 237.0 6 106.9 116.0 17.4 15.5 92 RW 88 2/15/01 B Slope behind RW I Station 5 +20 237.0 6 107.3 116.0 17.1 15.5 93 RW 89 2/15/01 B Slope behind RW I Station 4 +75 238.0 6 105.0 116.0 19.0 15.5 91 RW 90 2/16/01 B Slope behind RW 1 Station 5 +25 242.0 6 104.6 116.0 18.9 15.5 90 RW 91 2/21/01 B Slope behind RW I Station 5+00 242.0 6 106.2 116.0 19.4 15.5 92 RW 92 2/21/01 B Slope behind RW 1 Station 4 +80 242.0 6 105.0 116.0 18.7 15.5 91 RW 93 2/21/01 B Slope behind RW 1 Station 4 +90 245.0 6 105.7 116.0 19.1 15.5 91 RW 94 2/21/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 3+95 234.0 6 104.8 116.0 19.3 15.5 90 RW 95 2/21/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 3 +50 238.0 6 108.5 116.0 17.1 15.5 94 RW 96 2/21/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 2 +75 237.0 6 107.6 116.0 18.3 15.5 93 RW 97 2/21/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 3 +10 241.0 6 105.5 116.0 18.1 15.5 91 RW 98 2/22/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 2 +85 246.0 6 106.1 116.0 18.4 15.5 91 RW 99 2/22/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 2 +30 239.0 6 107.6 116.0 18.0 15.5 93 RW 100 2/22/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 2 +65 250.0 6 107.3 116.0 19.1 15.5 93 RW 101 2/22/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 2 +20 245.0 6 105.9 1 16.0 18.4 15.5 91 RW 102 2/22/01 SF Slope behind RW I Station 7 +55 230.0 6 106.4 116.0 17.2 15.5 92 RW 103 2/22/01 SF Slope behind RW I Station 5 +60 238.0 6 107.1 1 16.0 18.0 15.5 92 RW 104 2/22/01 SF Slope behind RW I Station 4 +85 240.0 6 105.7 116.0 17.8 15.5 91 RW 105 222/01 SF Slope behind RW 2 Station 3 +30 238.0 6 105.2 116.0 18.5 15.5 91 RW 106 3/2/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 2 +45 248.0 6 106.1 116.0 19.1 15.5 91 RW 107 32/01 B Slope behind RW 2 Station 2 +55 252.0 6 105.4 116.0 19.6 15.5 91 RW 108 32/01 SF Slope behind RW 2 Station 2 +60 242.0 6 104.8 116.0 19.3 15.5 90 Project Number: 940028 -032 Project Name: ETC /Lot 45 Project Location: 0 Client: 0 Page 5 of 5 etghton and Associates, Inc GZIIDPITZIM APPENDIX C Laboratory Testin¢ Procedures and Test Results Expansion Index Tests: Expansion Index was determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method D4829. Sample Sample Location Soil Type Expansion Expansion Number 127.0 10.0 Index Potential E4 Import Reddish brown, silty sand 6 Very Low E5 Import Brown, silty sand 0 Very low E6 Northern portion of Yellowish brown, silt with sand 43 Low Yellow -brown, sandy silt with clay Apartment Building 15.5 E7 Eastern portion of Yellowish brown, silt with sand 35 Low Apartment Building E8 Southern portion of Yellowish brown, silt with sand 70 Medium apartment building E9 Recreation/Leasing Yellowish brown, sandy silt 44 Low Building • Based on the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC), Table I8 -I -B. Maximum Density Tests: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical materials were determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method D 1557. The results of these tests are presented in the table below: Sample Number SampleDescnptio° Maximum Dry Density(pcf) Optimum Moisture Content I Light yellow- brown(SM) 127.0 10.0 2 Light yellow- brown(SM) 118.5 12.5 3 Red- brown(SM) — Import 128.0 8.5 4 Yellow - brown, silty sand —Import 127.5 9.5 5 Grayish brown, silty sand with gravel —import 139.3 6.5 6 Yellow -brown, sandy silt with clay 116.0 15.5 C -1 940028 -032 APPENDIX (Continued) Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate contents of selected samples were determined by standard geochemical methods. The test results are presented in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description Sulfate Content ( %) Sulfate Exposure Southern Portion of Yellowish brown, silt with 0.03 Negligible Apartment Building sand Recreation/Leasing Yellowish brown, sandy silt 0.125 Moderate Building * Based on the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC), Table 19- A- 4(ICBO,1997). C -2 c . i W' Date: August 29, 2000 To: Company: City of Encinitas Address: 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 From: Sherry Morrison Project: Poinsettia Ridge Apartments Project #: 200015 Subject: Four copies of plans X Your Request _X-For Your Use —For Your Review /Comments ____For Approval To Whom It May Concem: - -- -For Necessary Action .... For Yourinfo /Files These four sets of plans are to be submitted with Architectural plans of the same name. This message is intended for the use of the Individual or entity to which it Is addressed and may contain Information that Is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message Is not the Intended recipient. you art hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Landscape Architecture - Planning 434 West Cedar Street, Suite 300, San Diego, California 92101 Phone: (619) 235 -5360, Fax: (619) 23 5 -5369 Water Management Plan Poinsettia Ridge GOAL The goal of this water management plan is to conserve water by combining water conserving design practices with guidelines for the landscape irrigation manager. This plan will provide the owner with the necessary information to maintain systems in peak performance, and make decisions on when and how much to irrigate The irrigation system should be maintained to distribute water as uniformly as possible. The Irrigation controller should be monitored weekly to determine if the system is operating properly. By reviewing the controller window readout to see if breakage, leaks, clogs, vandalized spray heads, or stolen spray heads has occurred ( high and low volume of flow). Also checking the voltage readout to review which valve `s solenoid is running hot and about to fail. The irrigation system is designed so surface runoff is addressed. The turf area station times does not exceed 9 minutes per on cycle. Certain stations will come on twice per day with the turf coming on first, then the shrubs, then the turf again. The sequence will allow soil percolation. Shrub area station times does not exceed 9 minute per on cycle. Shrub stations are in consecutive sequence followed by the plaza stations, and then the bubbler stations. The irrigations system is designed with East / North facing plants on the same stations and the West I South facing plants on the same stations. Some stations may have a slight exposure around corners (example East / North with a slight West or West / South with a slight North. The trees and the palms are on the area sprinkler and their own deep watering bubbler stations. Contractor to adjust the bubbler stations when nessecary. When opportunities in the weather (overcast, cloudy, cooler than normal) has been forecasted in January, February, March, April, and May a reduction on the existing watering schedule should be implemented to save additional water for the summer weather. The landscape irrigation manager should maintain records of monthly water usage and determine if the site is staying within the allotment allowed by the San Diegito Water District during drought conditions. SOIL AND CLIMATIC CONDITION The soil ranges from silty sand and decomposed granite to rocky granitic concentrations with slight amounts of clay. The soil is compact having less absorbing properties. The location is located in a Southern California coastal region, and is influenced by south coastal cloud, fog, and wind conditions, and sometimes experiences Santa Ana winds from the desert ANNUAL PRECIPTATION RATE The annual historical precipitation rate is 9.45 inches per year. For guideline use 1991 precipitation rate will be used, with the 80% limit in place. The Eto for 1991 was 57.09, with the 75% limit the Eto is 42.9. WATER SOURCE The water source for the site will be delivered by San Diegito Water District. SOIL PERCOLATION A test sample using the silty sand, and decomposed granite that was screen to 1132 of inch and smaller. Using a 1 inch saturation buffer, the following percolation rate for the next 1 inch took 2 minutes. The irrigation run time on each station per cycle will be less than 10 minutes. This schedule will reduce the possibility of soil water field capacity and reduce runoff. PRECIPITATION RATES — PLANTED AREAS The precipitation rates for each irrigated area are as follows. Series, Low Gallonage, Matched Precipitation Rates, with Pressure Compensating Nozzles. )INSETTIA RIDGE THE MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE The formulas below are used to show compliance with the regulations on the maximum water allowance for a year, using the estimated figures from the irrigation schedules attached. MAWA = (ETO)'(0 8)'(LA)*(0,62) where: MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance (Gallons per Year) = 1.032.236 ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration ( Inches per Year) = 42.9 0.8 = ET Adjustment Factor = 0.8 LA = Landscaped Area (square feet) —Note: Same as HA = 48,511 0.62 = Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot) = 0.62 ESTIMATED APPLIED WATER USE The Estimated Applied Water Use shall not exceed the Maximum Applied Water Allowance. It may be calculated by summing the amount of water recommended in the Irrigation Schedule. >>Total gallons for the year —from the Gallonage Used Schedule = 672.238 ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE The Estimated Total Water Use may be calculated by summing the amount of water recommended in the Irrigation Schedule and adding any amount of water expected from effective precipitation, or may be calculated from a formula as follows: EWU (hydrozone) = (ETO)'(PF)'(HA)'(0.62 (IE) EWU (hydrozone) = Estimate Water Use (Gallons per Year) = 658,481 ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches per year) PF = Plant Factor —Note: Same as Species Factor (SF) ) ' See HA = Hydrozone Area (square feet) - -Same as LA )' below 15,473 (0.62) = Conversion Factor IE = Irrigation Efficiency 'Note: As the PF can vary per valve, the (PF)•(HA) in the formula is calculated by multiplying the PF times the HA individually for each valve, then adding the totals. POINSETTIA RIDGE THE MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE The formulas below are used to show compliance with the regulations on the maximum water allowance for a year, using the estimated figures from the irrigation schedules attached. MAWA = (ETO)'(0 8)'(LA)'(0 62) where: MAWA = Maximum Applied Water Allowance (Gallons per Year) = 1,609,030 ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration ( Inches per Year) = 42.9 0.8 = ET Adjustment Factor = 0.8 LA = Landscaped Area (square feet) —Note: Same as HA = 75,618 0.62 = Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot) = 0.62 ESTIMATED APPLIED WATER USE The Estimated Applied Water Use shall not exceed the Maximum Applied Water Allowance. It may be calculated by summing the amount of water recommended in the Irrigation Schedule. >>Total gallons for the year —from the Gallonage Used Schedule = 944,735 STIMATED TOTAL WATER USE The Estimated Total Water Use may be calculated by summing the amount of water recommended in the Irrigation Schedule and adding any amount of water expected from effective precipitation, or may be calculated from a formula as follows: EWU (hydrozone) = (ETO)'(PF)'(HA) "(0.62) (I E) EWU (hydrozone) = Estimate Water Use (Gallons per Year) = 924.546 ETO = Reference Evapotranspiration (inches per year) = 4Z.y1 PF = Plant Factor —Note: Same as Species Factor (SF) }' See HA = Hydrozone Area (square feet) —Same as LA }' Note 21,725 (0.62) = Conversion Factor = = 0.62 0.6251 IE = Irrigation Efficiency 'Note: As the PF can vary per valve, the (PF)'(HA) in the formula is calculated by multiplying the PF times the HA individually for each valve then adding the totals. By: Sludibfive WATER PROGRAM POINSETTIA RIDGE FORMULA TO DETERMINE MINUTES PER WEEK: ETO /4.33'PF/0.625/PR'SF-60 t The "ETO" is shown under each month - Letters. L S U = Lawn, snmo, Unp. -nos.: r, z, c = high. med., low water regmremen ALLONS AREA PRECIP. PLANT IRRIG. SOIL JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR 1.72 2.15 3.01 3.87 4.73 5.16 5.59 5.59 4.3 3.01 2.15 1.62 42.9 TNOD-*' PER SO. FT. RATE FACT. EFF. SLOPE < - - -- MINUTES PER WEEK - - -> MINUTE HA PR ) (PF ) (IE) SF T -1 L2 43.00 2009 2.06 0.6 0.625 1.00 11 14 19 25 31 33 36 36 28 19 14 10 276 T -2 L2 18.00 2439 0.71 0.6 0.625 1.00 32 40 56 72 69 97 105 105 80 56 40 30 802 T -3 L2 19.50 509 3.69 0.6 0.625 1.00 6 8 11 14 17 19 20 20 16 11 8 6 156 S-4 S2 11.40 582 1.89 0.3 0.625 1.00 6 B 11 14 17 18 20 20 15 11 8 6 154 S -5 S2 37.50 2208 1.64 0.3 0.625 1.00 7 9 12 16 19 21 23 23 17 12 9 7 175 S -6 S2 30.00 21342 1102 0.3 0.625 1.00 11 14 20 25 31 34 37 37 28 20 14 11 282 S -7 S2 31.70 4828 0.63 0.3 0.625 1.00 18 23 32 41 50 54 59 59 45 32 23 17 453 S -8 S2 33.70 1433 2.26 0.3 0.625 1.00 5 6 9 11 14 15 16 16 13 9 6 5 125 S -9 S2 38.90 2552 147 0.3 0.625 1.00 8 10 14 18 21 23 25 25 19 14 10 7 194 S -10 S2 24.00 815 2.84 0.3 0.625 1.00 4 5 7 9 11 12 13 13 10 7 5 4 100 S -11 S2 46.00 2562 1.73 03 0.625 1.00 7 8 12 15 18 20 22 22 17 12 8 6 167 S -12 S2 35.70 2000 1.72 0.3 0.625 1.00 7 8 12 15 18 20 22 22 17 12 8 6 167 S -13 S2 40.70 2073 1.89 0.3 0.625 1.00 6 8 11 14 17 18 20 20 15 11 8 6 154 S -14 S2 30.50 1200 2.45 0.3 0.625 1.00 5 6 8 11 13 14 15 15 12 B 6 4 117 S -15 S2 18.00 972 118 0.3 0.625 1.00 6 8 11 14 18 19 21 21 16 11 8 6 159 S -16 S2 21.00 1033 1.96 0.3 0.625 1.00 6 7 10 13 16 18 19 19 15 10 7 6 146 S -17 S2 30.90 1346 2.21 0.3 0.625 1.00 5 6 9 12 14 16 17 17 13 9 6 5 129 S -18 S2 30.40 911 3.21 0.3 0.625 1.00 4 4 6 8 10 11 12 12 9 6 4 3 89 S -19 S2 19.30 564 3.30 0.3 0.625 1.00 3 4 6 8 10 10 11 11 9 6 4 3 85 S -20 S21 34.30 889 3.72 0.3 0.625 1.00 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 10 8 5 4 3 76 S -21 S2 38.10 1753 2.09 0.3 0.625 1.00 5 7 10 12 15 16 18 18 14 10 7 5 137 S -22 S2 16.60 807 1.98 0.3 0.625 1.00 6 7 10 13 16 17 19 19 14 1 0 7 5 143 A -23 S2 3200 . 6511 0.47 0.3 0.625 1.00 24 30 42 54 66 73 79 79 60 42 30 23 602 A -24 S2 23.60 5673 0.40 0.2 0.625 1.00 19 24 33 43 52 57 62 62 4B 33 24 1 475 TOTALS 704.80 48,511 214 268 376 484 591 644 701 701 538 376 268 202 5,363 WATER PROGRAM POINSETTIA RIDGE PAGE #2 'Letters L S D = Lawn Shrub Drip - -Nos 1 2 3 = high , med_ low water requirement. The "ETO" is shown under each month STA- L -' GALLONS AREA PRECIP. PLANT IRRIG. SOIL/ JAN I FEB I MAR I APR MAY JUN I JUL I AUG I SEP I OCT NOV DEC YEAR 1,721 2 151 3 011 3.87 4.73 5.16 5.59 5.59 4.3 3.01 2.15 1.62 42.9 TION S -' PER SQ. FT. RATE FACT. EFF- SLOPE <- MINUTES PER WEEK -> NO. D -' MINUTE HA PR ) (PF) (IE ) (SF 5 -25 S2 S2 30.40 33.60 5336 5749 0.55 0.56 0.2 0.2 0.625 0.625 1.00 1.00 14 14 17 17 24 24 31 30 38 37 42 41 45 44 45 44 35 34 24 24 17 17 13 13 345 339 S -26 S -27 S2 21.60 5737 0.36 0.2 0.625 1.00 21 26 37 47 58 63 68 68 53 37 26 20 524 S -28 S2 25.20 2730 0.89 0.2 0.625 1.00 9 11 15 19 24 26 28 28 21 15 11 8 215 S -29 S2 3830 1746 2.11 0.2 0.3 0.625 1.00 4 5 6 8 10 11 12 12 9 6 5 3 91 P -30 S2 22.00 339 6.25 0 625 1.00 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 6 5 3 2 2 45 P -31 S2 41.50 747 5.35 03 0.625 1.00 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 7 5 4 3 2 54 P -32 S2 40.50 766 5.09 03 0.625 1 n 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 7 6 4 3 2 56 P -33 S2 41.50 795 5.03 0.3 0.625 1.00 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 7 6 4 3 2 56 P -34 S2 44.00 670 6,321 0.31 0.4 0.625 1.00 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 6 5 3 2 2 45 8 -35 S2 24.D0 588 3.93 0.625 1.00 4 5 7 9 11 12 13 13 10 7 5 4 100 B -36 S2 31.00 812 3.68 0.4 0.625 1.00 4 5 7 9 11 12 13 13 10 7 5 4 100 B -37 S2 21.00 588 3.44 0.4 0.625 1.00 4 6 8 10 12 13 14 14 11 8 6 4 110 13-38 S2 19.00 504 3.63 0.4 0.6 100 4 5 7 9 12 13 14 14 11 7 5 4 105 PG. 1 8 2 1138.40 75,618 302 378 529 681 834 909 987 987 761 529 376 285 7,560 YEARLY WATERING SCHEDULE POINSETTIA RIDGE 'LEGEND, L S D = Lawn,Shrub,Drip. 12 3 = high, med., low water requirement. STA- JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV TION L -' GALS ' 3 V"3 ' 3 �� ' 3 C� ' E L� ' S V, '03 3 tg NUM- S' PER 5 : a ` BER D -' MIN - s a r a c V1 c - -- >- T -1 L2 43.00 2 1 6 2 1 7 3 1 6 3 1 8 4 1 8 3 11 4 1 9 4 1 9 2 1 14 1 1 19 1 1 14 T -2 L2 18.00 3 2 5 3 2 7 6 1 .9 5 2 7 6 2 7 6 2 8 6 2 9 6 2 9 6 2 7 6/ 9 1 1 40 T -3 L2 19.50 1 1 6 1 1 8 2 1 6 2 1 7 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 7 3 1 5 1 1 11 1 1 8 S4 S2 11.40 1 1 8 1 1 8 2 1 6 2 1 7 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 7 2 1 8 1 1 11 1 1 8 S -5 S2 37.50 1 1 7 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1 8 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 8 3 1 8 2 1 9 1 1 12 1 1 9 S -6 S2 30.00 2 1 6 2 1 7 3 1 7 3 1 8 4 1 8 4 1 9 4 1 9 4 1 9 2 1 14 1 1 20 1 1 14 S -7 S2 31.70 2 2 5 3 1 8 4 1 8 5 1 8 5 2 5 6 1 9 6 2 5 6 2 5 2 1 23 2 1 16 1 1 23 S -8 S2 33.70 1 1 5 1 1 6 2 1 5 2 1 6 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 1 5 4 1 3 2 1 5 2 1 3 S -9 S2 38.90 2 1 4 2 1 5 2 1 7 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 8 3 1 8 3 1 8 3 1 6 2 1 7 1 1 10 5 -10 S2 24.00 1 1 4 2 1 3 2 1 4 2 1 51 2 1 6 3 1 4 2 1 7 2 1 7 3 1 31 2 1 4 1 1 5 5 -11 S2 46.00 1 1 7 2 1 4 2 1 6 3 1 5 3 1 6 3 1 7 4 1 6 4 1 6 3 1 6 2 1 6 2 1 4 5 -12 S2 35.70 1 1 7 2 1 4 2 1 6 2 1 8 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 7 3 1 7 2 1 9 2 1 6 1 1 8 5 -13 S2 40.70 1 1 6 2 1 4 2 1 6 2 1 7 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 7 2 1 8 1 1 11 1 1 8 S -14 S2 30.50 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 8 2 1 6 2 1 7 2 1 7 3 1 5 3 1 5 2 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 6 S -15 S2 18.00 1 1 6 2 1 4 2 1 6 3 1 5 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 1 7 3 1 7 3 1 5 2 1 6 1 1 8 5 -16 S2 21.00 1 1 6 1 1 7 2 1 5 2 1 7 2 1 8 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 1 6 2 1 8 1 1 10 1 1 7 5 -17 S2 30.90 1 1 5 1 1 6 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1 7 3 1 5 3 1 6 3 1 6 2 1 7 1 1 9 1 1 8 5 -18 S2 30.40 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 1 6 1 1 8 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1 6 2 1 6 1 1 9 1 1 6 1 1 4 5 -19 S2 1910 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 6 2 1 4 2 1 5 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1 6 2 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 4 S -20 S2 34.30 1 1 3 1 1 4 2 1 3 2 1 4 3 1 3 2 1 5 2 1 5 4 1 3 3 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 2 S -21 S2 38.10 2 1 3 2 1 4 3 1 3 3 1 4 3 1 5 3 1 5 2 1 9 5 1 4 4 1 4 3 1 3 2 1 4 S -22 S2 16.60 2 1 3 2 1 4 3 1 3 2 1 7 3 1 5 3 1 8 3 1 8 3 1 6 3 1 5 2 1 5 2 1 4 A -23 S2 3200 . 123.601 3 1 8 4 2 4 5 1 8 6 2 5 5 2 7 6 2 6 6 2 7 6 2 7 6 2 5 5 1 8 5 1 6 A -24 IS2 3 1 6 5 2 2 5 1 71 7 2 31 6 1 9 6 2 5 6 2 5 6 2 5 6 1 8 4 1 8 4 1 6 TOTAL MIN /DAY 126 125 142 149 149 155 162 155 180 209 211 TOTAL HRSANK 16 4.6 6.3 8.2 10.0 10.8 11.9 11.9 9.2 6.2 4.5 TOTAL HRS/DAY 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.5 DEC YEARLY WATERING SCHEDULE 1 1 10 1 1 30 1 1 6 1 1 6 1 1 7 1 1 11 1 1 17 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 4 1 1 6 t 1 8 t t e 1 1 4 1 1 8 1 1 B 1 1 5 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 5 1 1 5 4 1 6 1 POINSETTIA RIDGE STA- GALS. GALLONS USED PER STATION PER MONTH YEARLY TION PER TOTAL PER NO. MIN. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG S P OCT NOV DEC STATION T -1 43.00 2234 2607 3351 4469 5958 6144 6703 6703 5213 3538 2607 1862 51,389 T -2 18.00 2338 3273 4209 5456 6547 7482 8418 8418 6547 4209 3118 2338 62,353 T -3 19.50 507 675 1013 1182 1520 1520 1773 1773 1267 929 675 507 13,341 S-4 11.40 296 395 592 691 889 889 1037 1037 790 543 395 296 7,850 S -5 1 37.50 1137 1624 1949 2598 2923 3410 3897 3897 2923 1949 1461 1137 28,905 S -6 30.00 1559 1819 2728 3118 4157 4676 4676 4676 3637 2598 1819 1429 36,892 S -7 31.70 2745 3294 4392 5490 6863 7412 8236 8236 6314 4392 3157 2333 62,864 S -8 33.70 730 876 1459 1751 2189 2189 2189 2189 1751 1459 876 730 18,388 S -9 38.90 1347 1684 2358 3032 3537 4042 4042 4042 3032 2358 1684 1179 32,337 S -10 24.00 416 624 631 1039 1247 1247 1455 1455 9351 831 520 415 11,016 S -11 46.00 1394 1593 2390 2988 3585 4183 4780 4780 3585 2390 1593 1195 34,456 S -12 3530 1082 1237 1855 2473 2782 3246 3246 3246 2782 1855 1237 927 25,966 S -13 40.70 1057 1410 2115 2467 3172 3172 3701 3701 2820 1939 1410 1057 28,021 S -14 30.50 660 792 1057 1585 1849 1849 1981 1981 1585 1057 792 528 15,716 S -15 18.00 468 624 935 1169 1403 1403 1637 1637 1169 935 624 468 12,472 S -16 21.00 546 637 909 1273 1455 1637 1637 1637 1455 909 637 546 13,278 S -17 30.90 669 803 1338 1606 1873 2007 2408 2408 1873 1204 803 669 17,661 S -18 30.40 527 527 790 1053 1316 1580 1580 1580 1185 790 527 395 11,850 S -19 19.30 251 334 501 669 836 836 1003 1003 836 501 334 251 7,355 S -20 34.30 446 594 891 1188 1337 1485 1485 1762 1337 891 594 446 12,476 S -21 38.10 990 1320 1485 1980 2475 2475 2970 3299 2640 1485 1320 625 23,264 S -22 1660 431 575 647 1006 1078 1294 1294 1294 1078 719 575 359 10,350 A -23 3200 . 3325 4434 5542 8314 9699 9976 11639 11639 8314 5542 4157 3325 85,906 A -24 23.60 18391 20441 3577 4292 5518 6131 6131 6131 4905 3270 2453 1839 48,130 TOTALS 1 PER MONTH 26,994 33,795 46,914 60,889 74,208 80,285 87,918 88,544 67,973 46,293 33,368 25,057 672,238 GALLONAGE USED POINSETTIA RIDGE PAGE #2 TA- GALS. GALLONS USED PER STATION PER MONTH YEARLY TION PER TOTAL PER NO. MIN. STATION JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC S -25 30.40 1843 2369 3159 3949 5265 5265 6318 6318 4607 3159 2369 1843 46,464 S -26 33.60 2037 2619 3492 4365 5092 5820 6547 6547 5092 3637 2619 2037 49,904 S -27 21.60 1964 2619 3367 4489 5612 5612 6734 6734 5051 3273 2619 1964 50,038 S -28 25.20 982 1309 1637 2182 2619 3055 3273 3273 2291 1746 1309 873 24,549 S -29 38.30 663 829 995 1327 1658 1990 1990 1990 1658 829 829 498 15,256 P -30 22.00 191 191 286 381 476 476 572 572 476 286 191 191 4,289 P -31 41.50 359 539 719 898 1078 1078 1258 1258 898 719 539 359 9,702 P -32 40.50 351 526 701 877 1052 1228 1228 1228 1052 701 526 351 9,821 P -33 41.50 359 539 719 898 1078 1258 1258 1258 1078 719 539 359 10,062 P -34 44.00 381 381 572 762 953 953 11431 1143 953 572 381 381 8,575 B -35 24.00 416 520 727 1039 1247 1247 1455 1455 1039 727 520 416 10,808 B -36 31.00 537 671 940 1342 1611 1611 1879 1879 1342 940 671 537 13,960 B -37 21.00 364 546 727 909 1091 1273 1273 1273 1091 727 546 364 10,184 B -38 19.00 329 411 576 823 987 1152 1152 1152 987 576 411 329 8,885 A -39 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A-40 0.00 0 0 0 ol 0 0 0 0 0 ol 0 0 0 TOTAL GALS. PAGES 1 82 37,770 47,864 65,531 85,130 104,027 112,303 123,998 124,624 95,588 64,904 47,437 35,559 944,735 YEARLY WATERING SCHEDULE EGENP � o • Lvx1.$I Ib OM 123-M h rM4.. b carer npwmiwnL TA- JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC ION GALS U # 3 -y UM- S-' PER YW ER I D-' MIN -1 L2 43.00 1 1 11 1 1 14 1 1 19 1 1 25 1 1 31 1 1 33 1 1 36 1 1 36 1 1 28 1 1 19 1 1 14 1 1 10 .2 L2 1 &00 1 1 32 1 1 40 1 1 56 1 1 72 1 1 89 1 1 87 1 1 105 1 1 105 1 1 80 1 1 56 1 1 40 1 1 30 -3 L2 19.50 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 11 1 1 14 1 1 17 1 1 19 1 1 20 1 1 20 1 1 16 1 1 11 1 1 8 1 1 6 4 S2 11.40 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 11 1 1 14 1 1 17 1 1 18 1 1 20 1 1 20 1 1 15 1 1 11 1 1 8 1 1 8 -5 S2 37501 1 1 7 1 1 9 1 1 12 1 1 161 1 1 19 1 1 21 1 1 23 1 1 231 1 1 17 1 1 12 1 1 91 1 1 7 6 S2 30.00 1 1 11 1 1 14 1 1 20 1 1 25 1 1 31 1 1 34 1 1 37 1 1 37 1 1 26 1 1 20 1 1 14 1 1 11 -7 S2 31.70 1 1 18 1 1 23 1 1 32 1 1 41 1 1 50 1 1 54 1 1 59 1 1 59 1 1 46 1 1 32 1 1 23 1 1 17 6 S2 33.70 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 9 1 1 11 1 1 14 1 1 15 1 1 16 1 1 16 1 1 13 1 1 9 1 1 6 1 1 5 4 S2 36.90 1 1 8 1 1 10 1 1 14 1 1 18 1 1 21 1 1 23 1 1 25 1 1 25 1 1 19 1 1 14.1 1 10 1 1 7 -10 S2 24.00 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 9 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 1 13 1 1 13 1 1 10 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 1 4 -11 S2 46.00 1 1 7 1 1 8 1 1 12 1 1 15 1 1 18 1 1 20 1 1 22 1 1 22 1 1 17 1 1 12 1 1 8 1 1 6 -12 82 35.70 1 1 7 1 1 8 1 1 12 1 1 15 1 1 18 1 1 20 1 1 22 1 1 22 1 1 17 1 1 12 1 1 8 1 1 6 -13 S2 40.70 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 11 1 1 14 1 1 17 1 1 18 1 1 20 1 1 20 1 1 15 1 1 11 1 1 8 1 1 6 -14 S2 30.50 1 1 6 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 11 1 1 13 1 1 14 1 1 15 1 1 15 1 1 12 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 4 -15 S2 18.00 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 11 1 1 14 1 1 18 1 1 19 1 1 21 1 1 21 1 1 16 1 1 11 1 1 8 1 1 6 -16 S2 21.00 1 1 6 1 1 7 1 1 10 1 1 13 1 1 16 1 1 18 1 1 19 1 1 19 1 1 15 1 1 10 1 1 7 1 1 6 .17 S2 30.90 1 1 5 1 1 8 1 1 9 1 1 12 1 1 14 1 1 16 1 1 17 1 1 17 1 1 13 1 1 9 1 1 6 1 1 5 .18 S2 3040 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 10 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 1 12 1 1 9 1 1 6 1 1 4 1 1 3 -19 S2 19.30 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 10 1 1 10 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 , 1 1 6 1 1 4 1 1 3 -20 S2 34.30 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 8 1 1 9 1 1 10 1 1 10 1 1 8 1 1 5 1 1 4 1 1 3 -21 S2 38.10 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 10 1 1 12 1 1 15 1 1 16 1 1 18 1 1 18 1 1 14 1 1 10 1 1 7 1 1 5 -22 Sl 16.60 1 1 6 1 1 7 1 1 10 1 1 13 1 1 18 1 1 17 1 1 19 1 1 19 1 1 14 1 1 10 1 1 7 1 1 5 .23 3200 . 1 1 24 1 1 30 1 1 42 1 1 54 1 1 66 1 1 73 1 1 79 1 1 79 1 1 60 1 1 42 1 1 30 1 1 23 -24 23.80 1 1 19 1 1 24 1 1 33 1 1 43 1 1 52 1 1 57 1 1 62 1 1 82 1 1 48 1 1 33 1 1 24 1 1 18 -25 S2 30.40 1 1 14 1 1 17 1 1 24 1 1 31 1 1 38 1 1 42 1 1 45 1 1 45 1 1 35 1 1 24 1 1 17 1 1 13 -26 S2 33.60 1 1 14 1 1 17 1 1 24 1 1 30 1 1 37 1 1 41 1 1 44 1 1 44 1 1 34 1 1 24 1 1 17 1 1 13 27 S2 21.60 1 1 21 1 1 26 1 1 37 1 1 47 1 1 58 1 1 63 1 1 68 1 1 68 1 1 53 1 1 37 1 1 26 1 1 20 .28 S2 2520 1 1 9 1 1 11 1 1 15 1 1 19 1 1 24 1 1 28 1 1 28 1 1 28 1 1 21 1 1 15 1 1 11 1 1 6 -29 $2 3830 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 0 1 1 10 1 1 11 1 1 12 t 1 12 1 1 9 1 1 6 1 1 5 1 1 3 -30 S2 22.00 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 6 1 1 5 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 -31 S2 41.50 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 0 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 2 -32 S2 40.50 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 8 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 8 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 2 33 S2 41.50 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 7 ' 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 6 1 1 / 1 1 3 1 1 2 -34 82 44.00 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 5 1 1 8 1 1 6 1 1 5 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 35 S2 24.00 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 9 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 1 13 1 1 13 1 1 t0 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 1 4 J8 S2 31.00 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 9 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 1 13 1 1 13 1 1 10 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 1 4 -37 S2 21.00 1 1 4 1 1 6 1 t 8 1 1 10 1 1 12 1 1 13 1 1 14 1 1 14 1 1 11 1 1 8 1 1 6 1 1 4 38 S2 19.00 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 9 1 1 12 1 1 13 1 1 14 1 1 14 1 1 11 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 1 4 39 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 40 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 41 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 42 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 43 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 44 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 45 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 46 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 47 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 48 0.001 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 ol 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 ol 1 1 0 1 1 0 DT 1Y 302 378 529 681 834 909 987 987 761 529 378 285 DTAL ° -�iN1C 3.6 4.5 6.3 8.1 9.9 10.7 117 11.7 9.0 6.3 4.5 34 DTAL HRS/DAY 5.0 631 8.8 114 13.9 15.2 16.5 16.5 12.7 8.8 6.3 4 .8 YEARLY WATERING SCHEDULE POINSETTIA RIDGE PAGE #2 'LEGEND; L S D = Lawn,Shrub.Drip. 1 2 3 = Mph, med., low water requirement. STA- JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC TION L -' GALS NUM- S -' PER BER D-' MIN a s s o a° 3' 3 `� r 3 `'� i 3 �' d i 3 3 S -25 S2 30.40 2 1 7 3 1 6 4 1 6 5 1 6 5 1 6 5 1 0 6 1 8 6 1 8 5 1 7 3 1 8 3 1 6 2 1 7 S -26 S2 33.60 2 1 7 2 1 9 4 1 6 5 1 6 5 1 7 5 1 8 5 1 9 5 1 9 5 1 7 5 1 5 3 1 6 2 1 7 S -27 S2 21.60 3 1 7 4 1 7 4 1 9 6 1 8 6 2 5 6 2 5 6 2 6 6 2 6 6 1 9 5 1 7 4 1 7 3 1 7 S -28 S2 25.20 3 1 3 2 1 6 1 1 15 4 1 5 4 1 6 4 1 7 5 1 6 5 1 8 3 1 7 4 1 4 2 1 6 1 1 8 S -29 S2 38.30 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 8 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1 6 2 1 6 2 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 3 P -30 S2 22.00 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 6 1 1 5 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 P -31 S2 41.50 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 6 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 2 P -32 S2 40.50 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 6 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 2 P -33 S2 41.50 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 1 6 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 2 P -34 S2 44.00 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 6 1 1 5 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 B -35 S2 24.00 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 7 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1 6 2 1 7 2 1 7 2 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 1 4 B-36 S2 31.00 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 7 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1 6 2 1 7 2 1 7 2 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 1 4 B -37 S2 21.00 1 1 4 1 1 6 1 1 8 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1 7 2 1 7 2 1 7 2 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 6 1 1 4 B-38 12 19.00 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 7 2 1 5 2 1 6 2 1 7 2 1 7 2 1 7 2 1 6 1 1 7 1 1 5 1 1 4 A -39 12 0.00 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 0 4 1 0 4 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 AA0 12 0.001 1 1 ol 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 3 1 0 4 1 01 4 1 01 3 1 01 2 1 0 2 1 0 GRAND TOTALS _ TOTAL MIN /DAY 180 192 231 227 234 247 258 251 264 281 275 231 TOTAL HRS=K 1.5 1.9 ZS 3.4 4.1 4.4 4.9 4.9 3.8 2.5 1.9 1.4 TOTAL HRS /DAY 3.0 3.2 3.9 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.4 4.7 4.6 3.9 sB OPROJECT /n�- SE77' //� RiOGE ,�P7"S SB &O, INC. ,5(7/22. zo Pi�"OWEO &0Z �Nci virus /l o,✓C* iAf�J. ZLC c�6ic Ilk -74 61- `-14 Svc7� T SA�Di�o, G4. 92i2/ 8s8- ¢s743sa 0. .90 FZ W i �K Z ¢ o N0.47677 m m a * Up. 12 - 31 -d3 CNIL - � CALIF Jv�y /Z, Zoc� f/TD REvisuo '54•?0Ie L,q&x /F/ 2oc ,e,e�co ex.. Z6er,eDMVy kla -4 1491hd sf✓/ � z�i sA�//JIEGo/ C�4. 9zi23 47677 j o'P /z -P 03 SIMO. INC. 3615 Kearny Villa Road. Suite 201, San Oieko, California 92123 (859) 560 -1141 FAX(959)7,60-8157 82L 1.. - lr,ild SB &0 Ss &O, INC. PROJECT /O1^iJt -m4 12-146,F .✓P.O.e oy&? 6 7 -11-oo t1D iZ z. z0 SRBA, INC. 3615 Kearny Villa Road. Suite Loo, San Diego, California 92123 18581 560 -1141 FAX 18581 560 -8157 z sB 0 PROJECT AlAl MA lel d6F /91°r911T/l1E T SB &O, INC. % - / /-iv /�) 561221 ZO 50 &0, WC. 3615 Kearnv Villa Road, Suite. 201, San Diego. Califumia 92123 (8581560-1141 FAX(858)560-9157 :c- SB &0 SR &O, INC. 1 J 1 3 PROJECT 6'-ysE777A i /dGc- AP,er�rryi 7 -// -oo l4.TO) -. 6-al2a. zo su-t�m�a� c Pr P� i..�a yav r z c n �c J, W SRb&O. INC. 3615 Kearny Villa Iluad. Suite 201, San Piano. California 92123 18581 560 -1141 FAX 18.581 .560 -8157 sB �o SB &O, INC. PROJECT f� /.utt-mA P-14GC 4P41V -Meg -� P /At- C4P4Ll i1 "(_CvLA77*A1S 7 /YI4.vni.uGS Ed✓Ane J /*v9 -/S Pvc a - o.o /o OiP� �� Scvr't- C'A+aAuTY 56/2z. zo fien�nc FcaW SR&O. INC. 3615 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 201, San Diego. (Aifornia 92123 (858) 5(d) -I 141 FAX (8581560-8157 17, '• 7% 12.3 c-Fs G• / c ✓ '/ - -- /70 /3.7 c--Fs 8-le � ✓ --/do 1/40 ¢% Z7.3 c-iS - - -- Z3.f cPi -- z6.4 cis ✓ /,VLfT [AT I %i am T 'j. 6 , be A.-- IN,fi [a7 �7 2.97, 7.9 c�j 7.9 c/j ✓ /IVtt.7 L.ar !/3 1z >►voyo ^SIR 0 /C�f I $'),?cP (Powc,,n = o.a13�_ lo. Bro ___� 34•sc�3 _✓ Z6.4c fS ✓ "76W'c Frrc y '�e�ar�/� /- /step) /z "�iz� l6.o cg's 15.3 cpJ S'c Y 6-�0 700) /a" /7" ¢.6c� Z•3cfi ✓ /a" 4..0cfr r/ /3,'7c FT _ 4 /a_gc_ � e. 7c-4 fl' / N cr E� P / " - - -- — -- - - �' - Z- 3.c�t. /2 /% SIGNATURE JOB ND. DES110" BY CHECKED BY I DATE SHEET NO. SR&O. INC. 3615 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 201, San Diego. (Aifornia 92123 (858) 5(d) -I 141 FAX (8581560-8157 SB &0 PROJECT ss &o, ❑vC. Pn c%arE INLAt-T CAAA n l 9-ISao i) TD sblaz -z0 12'xiz," 6RArpj W LET$ Przo>a60 n wTt'n-cE,'r Fv7v2E SvQrm,"vc 9AJ 6tInA6tr FLVon- DrLAtn.A&e7 INT"pliM C00al7'no,J (e0* 4 GezAnffJ&) — 1NRC7-�- wlLc- BE 51 7-0 CON A&Y 100 yC44- Fi-D- J UL.nMA rr CwMnW — 6AATrO wLk-TS lj/vc St-muc, As Gf4 -f2Aoc D2AfNAGc (Nor OPej Ta 511-0 G o /L FLoi J eyu, Q= cN P (ti) f.S - Co = 3.3 h � Dt =-rna D►f-I C15 FLV VJ EQU- Q =CA 2F C= o• 60 L:?- L3.3 PJ ' 12 zlt "INLer- AssvME 5o %CWGGN�G, P =Z MAX ^j To ONE 0f= T7+CSE � �S��3AIat-ia „PII l/3 6- J►f"Q 0.&Ar E:AcA 0 F- -rNzS E INL C-7r I S P"\Jl D dD INrg-mCCpj- 7 Ibo YOM FLU�J RII'�+N6 1'LOVf�hl GYLA�fN(� Qt h= 4.SIa] ASS�M6 %2 CtpGbt� N A= 1''rIAX Q' Z. i Cfs Oven- -M I N I_k-TN rN-j S LocA nvj 0NL -1, A K o ni-t-L INUe7S }+AJIF EMA CAPwury SIMO. INC. 3615 Keartry Villa Road. Suit, 201. tiara Diego. California '/21231N.SRI 560 -1141 FAX (85815(A)-S]57 sB 0 PROJECT 1b 11%1,SC-77A R1466- 4Iqv1z77j,7cmT v .i sB &O, INC. TYPE 2? /N64-T eAAgC/TY 9 -Ir-w !)?D S612z•zo A4 wA-VM 7W AV /A/ A Sv/77P11 /1J AAT- A FLOid- c y iNC &-r /-/,7-? 6, y = m •x POtiOf77 NE7GNT — igSjv»�E lYi�✓Otb 7a Tat° 0>� 010t.4-6 ly =o-S> 90) Sue,a ru-4 Q -2,9c� Uh"2 -F / -/0? 6G h =0.s' // o.s' ¢� 90� `� G c `��c QcwP BY SIMO. INC. 3615 Kearny Villa Ruad. Suite 201. San Diego. Calif irnia 721231X:581 560-1141 P.4X 18.5X1 56(1 -X157 4 3 2 1.7 .1.0- .9 .7 .6 .S .4 .3 L 2 L ¢l, .2 7T FCTTION--t-\ � -,- ELE V4Ti0N REV. CITY OF SAN DIEGO - DESIGN GUIDE SHTL N0. NOMOGRAM- CAPACITY ,CURB INLET AT SAG 1� CHART I- 103.6C I.o z D 0 0 10 0 6 6 tA� S 9 V 4 J O 2 T N d /_ W U = ZZ tL _ a (L A O O 0000 O Z W CL S = = i W 3 x �? 0 W 2 = 4 O N 2 / 0 W ¢ W ¢ W r e a ? I--, �� > x r 3 u a r D8 0. V .06 .OS W Z D4 O 2 a DS 4 3 2 1.7 .1.0- .9 .7 .6 .S .4 .3 L 2 L ¢l, .2 7T FCTTION--t-\ � -,- ELE V4Ti0N REV. CITY OF SAN DIEGO - DESIGN GUIDE SHTL N0. NOMOGRAM- CAPACITY ,CURB INLET AT SAG 1� sB OPROJECT P61,j St- mA (?44 6 E Argv R�mE,.� Sa &O, MC. D --�S D m44 CARAC4 -ry I q IS -w a J'o S61 zz.20 2 0� %:::. 4-TI-Of Mlmmom SLOPE Dln H 0-j f zcTEx- =tj.O,% Wlhu� ,OCGIrr -S Fv+'1.. Iou'LEiJGT -A !S[- --r (�, Sr-A. 144 r (C_M) 5 =o. ooh _ 'h =o.ols ` cAV$ - 76 CTS Rz,ofvi (72) 171R-EC--)oNS Flow FKvNt Soon-4 IS. I ,,j \�J 1 414 SLOPE >0-40% I F 3, E4 T-i12t-L:ncr-► i� l -) — C-AA1_ K IF0,C.ATU -1 8woJ c, ISi 811 Q= 15.3 Cf� Ffte 1 (2) 'i 1 a-c-C.P1oN. -s FLOW riuy-. /WVIXI: 1,6 1N 6- 7S W M4 SLOPE = /3,15S ANb CA et, (U v- 4/ 3/4 Q� �2AINQ6(5 l.YRA- n- ��n�'�' /0-11- v 5our-W 1%4 c -Fs 0 o. ro t FytcM NoaTQ -y4-(K--1) I.5 c43' ✓& -*((g 13.1 Q. = 36. ZC-fr 1 SR &O. INC. 3615 K,arny Villa Road, Suite 201. San Diego. California 92123 1 R5R1 560 -1141 FAX IN.581 5W -8157 H EQUAT /ON SOOD // 9L j� 385- Fcef Tc H 5000 / 7c ° Time of cancenfiafion �'(w 20 L • Length of wafershed(/�1 /Gb'S� dDDO H Del*. -ence /n e%vaficn a/ong /' 7frr) 3000 efiecf/ve S/ooe 1117 CSee fgp&m&;r X -BJ 7e C /a .Hi /es Feef Nvurs Minutes 2DOD 4 2499 2000 \ 3 /BO /0 /DDD \ 900 30 NOTE H60 z /20 700 9 /DO 600 \ \ S 90 SOD ZO A ADD TEN MINUTES TO d BO 400 ��fa 4- 70 800 CENTRATION- so � 100 \ 1 d0 _ 3 SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL DISTRICT SERVICES DESIGN MANUAL APPROVED NOMOGRAPH FOR DETERMINATION OF TIME OF CONCENTRATION (Tc) FOR NATURAL WATERSHEDS CATE %2 11,¢ APPENDIX X -A L -A -10 Rev. S /31 /90 / SOOD 4QD0 20 3000 � /6 /a 40 2000 \ 12 30 NOTE m — /400 9 Qar�aw�m eras FOR NATURAL WATERSHEDS /200 B ZO A ADD TEN MINUTES TO d /000 7 COMPUTED TIME OF CON p 800 CENTRATION- 700 S040 SD S _ 3 I SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL DISTRICT SERVICES DESIGN MANUAL APPROVED NOMOGRAPH FOR DETERMINATION OF TIME OF CONCENTRATION (Tc) FOR NATURAL WATERSHEDS CATE %2 11,¢ APPENDIX X -A L -A -10 Rev. S /31 9.' 6 a s. x 0 v L .. L ,9 C J v .s a s �,s X C 10 INTENSITY- DUMTION GESIGN CURT J C" , 0 1 c v n J. rr 16.0 r i 5.0 j40� 3,5 s �3.0 '2.5 15 20 30 40 50 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 a 5 .0 Directions for Application: 1) From precipitation naps determine 6 hr. and 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrolo(. Manual (10, 50 ,ind 100 yr. maps included in Design and Procedure Manual). 2) Adjust 6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of 4�% to. 65% of tithe 24 hr. precipitation. (Not applicable to Desert) 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on the right side of the chart. 4) Draw a line through the point parallel to th plotted lines. 5) This line is the intensity- duration curve fo the location being analyzed. Application Form: 0) Selected Frequency yr. 1) P6 ° 2.7 in. , P24' 4• p , *P6 2) Adjusted *P6= 2•� Pin 6j 3) tc min. Armu&A 4) I c in /hr. *Not Applicable to Desert Region LA 7- 3,? d �N APPENDIX XI IV —A -14 TABLE 2 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS (RATIONAL METHOD) DEVELOPED AREAS (URBAN UScz NOTES: (I)Soil Group mans are available at the offices of the Department of Public Works. (2)Where actual conditions deviate significantly from the tabulated impervious- ness values of 805, or 90%, the values given for coefficient C, may be revised by multiplying 805, or 90% by the ratio of actual imperviousness to the tabulated imperviousness. However, in no case shall the final coefficient be less than 0.50. For example: Consider commercial property on D soil.group. Actual imperviousness - 50% Tabulated imperviousness = 80'/, Revised C = ao x 0.85 = 0.53 IV-A -9 APPENDIX IX -B Rev. S /91 Coefficient. C Soil Group (1) Land Use A B C D Residential: Single Family .40 .45 .50 55• Multi -Units .45 .50 .6o .70 Mobile homes .45 .50 .55 .65 Rural (lots greater than 1/2 acre) .30 .35 .40 .45 Commercial(2) .70 .75 .80 .85 80% Impervious Industrial(2) .80 .85 .90 .95 905, Impervious 0.45 UScz NOTES: (I)Soil Group mans are available at the offices of the Department of Public Works. (2)Where actual conditions deviate significantly from the tabulated impervious- ness values of 805, or 90%, the values given for coefficient C, may be revised by multiplying 805, or 90% by the ratio of actual imperviousness to the tabulated imperviousness. However, in no case shall the final coefficient be less than 0.50. For example: Consider commercial property on D soil.group. Actual imperviousness - 50% Tabulated imperviousness = 80'/, Revised C = ao x 0.85 = 0.53 IV-A -9 APPENDIX IX -B Rev. S /91 COUffTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION G FLOOD CONTROL 451 i 301 I I 151 33' 100 -YEAR 6 4111SOU PRECIPITATION -20./ ISQPLUUTALS OF 100 -YEAR 6410UR MECIy ITATION It TINS OF AN Ii�Cli fffttt /...fff 2 QfACU 35 ? SAN CLIVINTE Ii 1• 1„ plat, 30 1 TELMAr.l�) -33'. 3, I I-7 PIIa U.S. DEPARTAIEN f OF COMMERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND AT OSPIIERIC ADMINISTRATION SPECIAL STUDIES DHA71Ci1. OFFICE DF 11 DROLOGY, NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE 301 1181 451 301 151 L( 117° 1151 301 �w UCCCA 151 116' COUNTY D OF SANITATION 8, 100-YEAR 244101 It PRECIPITATION FLOOD CONTROL '- 20ASOPLUVIALS 0 100- - 24 -HOUR PRECIPITATION IN TENTHS OF AN INCH 115' •� o� alt sq 100 ��'NHo 5 i . \ 1 onu vS On I LAC I u u ,CI c ' 00 (' /.• SA CF 1 60 BLS iTti )� laiu. 30' ]a>- ( \ \�.. Ott, �( (T , -, — — SAN CL n1ENTE 0 • L 1 r 1 'I 100 ]D 10 X100 Rrl$1111. �; L-,0. un 1 / ,.100 1 4.40 3�- 5 0�� vr, f,• I 1 c 33 e -- Cp -- aIrL IAA' 1�, jl �,I ��1 ii0 Jo- 33 3' Il Oct 0 B0 �\ U.S. AI:PARTMEN I' OF COMMERCE ' )p` �� C L2 Cur. as NATIONAL OCRA \IC AND AT' USI•IIERIC ADMINISTRATION > r^ _ .EI1� 0g5d SPECIAL STUDIES DEANCII. OFFICE OF U. DROLOOY, NATIONAL WEATIIER SERVICE $Ar n: �/ f- /' -, u-,807 UCpl0�]0- '- '�6aG0 � �J0! L.. - -'4 a5' GU 30' { H i- 1 111" 1151 10' I Fi' 1 1 ]' ]I!i' 301 I S' I l ri N)WOMeYSMYFOR FACNTASAAAM PONSEMA RMEAPARMENTS --------------- 7 K, 'Tlf ice_FF- �Ul ?OVJZTM 81666 A FASMAKS ST-ubq 7-IZ.00 M sc" 0 N- —