Loading...
2000-6277 G/PEA LEERING SERVICES DEPARTM. Nr •, Field Opercitions TMMC tee. u' INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ® Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( 41) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development- Current Plannine 1 I I O Fire-Fire Prevention ATTENTION: ( Coij'o ✓\ San Dieeuito Water District- Engineerine & Planning_ Community Services — Parks & Beaches DATE: 11 O O Regarding (Finance Number (7;k_7% - 6 1k ) DEPOSIT (f0IM/MUP/NN/DR: ' 2.. (Finance Number a R*77 - fM ) DEPOSI7(� " mar.% 1 ro A-e> Fbrt Y... Iew .d. IIZ' (Finance Number - _� DEPOSIT/FEE APN: 26'f- %Y.V/ S Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ® Final Map ❑+ 1� Check Checkprini / Approved Copy / Original / or Revised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( StafVConsultant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/Water/Sewer/frail/Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan O Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Grading Pln � I S � _Cbpck Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original /or Revised Plan Change Description: (Mas ou liminary/Precise) rosion Co laming & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval For your... Correction ❑ Comment ® Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return w�'n 2 w k s Please call: if necessary Originator. r 6^ylt Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92020 -3633 TEL (760) 633.2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG1ARR/lntcr_Tram.doc/03.02.99 1 of 1 PASCO ENGINEERIN( 535 N. Highway 101 Suite,. SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075 (619) 259.8212 Fax (619) 259.4812 TO CITY A C1iG.v/iAs G=r1/(r /NE&r //vb WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ LSL5�L5� JLr' � � ° UV�LAiU��U°�LS DATE /— /O — Z ✓K, JOa ATTENTION LA /R RE, f //,'fT sign iTJ�C �U�tIEC F, �y ! l nroTfGE CPC o &J5100V / ff FPOf l the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION ! l nroTfGE CPC o &J5100V / ff FPOf l FNG. Pli- ! t Di= iAPF� / l -f0 rSAT ��1 Gl 66r At 94 410W -f PM THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use V requested r review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE • Approved as submitted • Approved as noted • Returned for corrections • Resubmit copies for approval • Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US All* /t6 Ca^f morpifD COPY TO SIGNED: if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 7 PASCO ENGINEERIN' 535 N. Highway 101 Suite.. SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075 (619) 259.8212 Fax (619) 259 -4812 TO C [Ty uG EN C_ "' . ?—A WE ARE SENDING YOU xAttached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ dC��u GC �C� 4G3LQGrJ�3�`]�44G^�d DATE JOB NO ATTENTION RE M -Z [L ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested )<For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify us at once. ROOM Sv X4I THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested )<For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify us at once. PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX(858)259 -4812 October 3, 2002 City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Debra Geishart RE: FINAL MONUMENTS PER MAP 18712, TPM 98 -272 Benamel Development (Adams Run) Dear Ms. Geishart: PE 786 Please be advised that the monumentation for the above referenced map has been completed, and the expenses incurred by this office for this monumentation have been paid in full. If you have any questions pertaining to the above, please don't hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. Joe Yuhas PLS 5211 Director of Land Surveying y�QH C r� 0 Y 110. 5211 *71p c /Xbj � z�z WAYNE A. PASCO R.C.E. 29577 I T Y O F E N C I N I T D, S INEERING SERVICES DEPART T 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PARCEL NO. : 264- 451 -0500 JOB SITE ADDRESS: 3540 FORTUNA RANCH APPLICANT NAME ADAM'S RUN LP MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 270649 CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA PERMIT NO.: 6277GI PLAN NO.: 6277 -G RD. PHONE NO.: 858- 613 -2990 ZIP: 92198 -0649 CONTRACTOR : BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT INC. PHONE NO.: 619 - 890 -1600 LICENSE NO.: 704370 LICENSE TYPE: B ENGINEER PASCO ENGINEERING INC. HOI 1 Ir. : 858- 259 -8212 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 2/07/01 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 2/07/02 PERMIT ISSUED BY: INSPECTOR: PETER HALL ---- -------------- -- - - - -- PERMIT FEES 6 DEPOSITS ---------------------------- 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 5,000.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 2. INSPECTION FEE : 13,581.00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 386,040.00 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 (p, F,gpp c4K'(kjL. F; 131I-qq.co ------------------ - - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------ ------- -- - - -- EARTHWORK /STORM DRAINAGE /COMMON ACCESS /EROSION CONTROL FOR 98 -272 TPM, 4EA SFD. DIRT: 9.7KCY CUT /2.3KCY IMPORT /12.OKCY FILL. DRAIN: 580LF DITCH /2EA SPILLWAY /360LF CHANNEL /2EA AREA /5EA OUTLET /22CY RIP - RAP /5EA INLET/ 192LF CULVERT /3EA HEADWALL /lEA CATCH BASIN. ACCESS: 65,471SF AC /PCC. LETTER DATED SEP 26 2000 APPLIES. ROW /SEWER /TRAIL BY SEPARATE PERMIT. - - -- INSPECTION ---------- --- - -- DATE -- - - - --- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. SI )SNATUR 6'a cl (S PRINT NAMEJ CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3 2,17 /o DATE SIGNED Iy )896 (�ao LE HONE NUMBE OTHER R /y�� T T Y O F E N C I N I T A S 1INEERING SERVICES DEPART T 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 IMPROVEMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 6277II PARCEL NO. : 264 - 451 -0500 PLAN NO.: 6277 -G JOB SITE ADDRESS: 3540 FORTUNA RANCH RD. APPLICANT NAME ADAM'S RUN LP MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 270649 PHONE NO.: 858- 613 -2990 CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: 92198 -0649 CONTRACTOR : BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT INC. PHONE NO.: 619 - 890 -1600 LICENSE NO.: 704370 LICENSE TYPE: B INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE CO POLICY NO. : CLRO50164 POLICY EXP. DATE: 12/15/01 ENGINEER : PASCO ENGINEERING INC. HO N .: 858- 259 -8212 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 2/07/01 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 2/07/02 PERMIT ISSUED BY: INSPECTOR: PETER HALL - ---------- -------- - - - --- PERMIT FEES 6 DEPOSITS ----------- ----------- - - -- -- 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 275.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 2. INSPECTION FEE 930.00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 18,594.00 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 (r. P'F'D HooL *w Trs ' j,Gco. oo ---- ----------- ---- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ---- --------------------- -- -- -- PUBLIC TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS FOR 98 -272 TPM, 4EA SFD, TO INCLUDE 410SF BRUSHED HYDRAULIC CONCRETE CROSSING /9,911SF EARTHEN SURFACING /1,534SF EARTHEN RECONSTRUCTION /3EA MARKERS /19EA WATER BARS. LETTER DATED SEP 26 2000 APPLIES. COORDINATE WITH PARKS /BEACHES SUPERINTENDENT PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. AS- BUILTS /lYR WARRANTY REQUIRED. - - -- INSPECTION ---------- - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION AS- BUILTS AND ONE YEAR WARRANTY RETENTION REQUIRED. I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. Gt-4cgl�ea�5 PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3 ?i G , DATE SIGNED L� I I ) 00 /� o eq ELE PHONE NUMBER OTHER �' ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT city of Capital Improvement Projects J' J✓ District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand ReplemshmentlSlr n ater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering September 26, 2000 attn: John Silverwood Benamel Development, Inc. P.O. Box 270649 San Diego, CA 92198 -0649 Re: Case 98 -272 TPM "SE1 14 SW1 /4 SW1 /4 Sec4 T1 3S R3W SBM " (Minor subdivision of 4 SFD parcels @ 3540 Fortuna Ranch Rd) Grading Application 6277GR (Rough Grading /Erosion Control /Private Road] Improvement Application 62771R (Public Trail, Deferred Monuments] Permanent Encroachment Application 6277PE [portion Fortuna Ranch Rd] Sewer Construction Application DCS3601Public Sewer) A.P.N. 264- 451 -05 Permit issuance requirements This correspondence shall serve to briefly summarize the Engineering Permit process. Drawings 6277 -G and CS -360, and the relevant proposed Final Parcel Map, have been submitted by the Engineer of Work for additional review and processing. When the assigned Planchecker verifies that the plans and map are correct and complete, submittal of mylar originals will be requested. Approval of the plans by the Director of Engineering Services will be valid for three years. In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per these Drawings, you will need to satisfy the following requirements: (1) Ensure that the proposed Final Parcel Map is technically correct. (2) Obtain all plan approvals. Provide 4 blueline copies of each approved Drawing, and 1 extra copy each of the soil report and its update, all by Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc., dated September 16, 1998 and September 7, 2000, respectively. (3) Post Security Deposits as follows: WGRADING PERMIT... in the amount of $386.040.00 to guarantee performance of earthwork, private road and drainage improvements, and erosion control, NIMPROVEMENT PERMIT... in the amount of $18,594.00 guarantee performance of public trail improvements, and in the amount of $1,500.00 to guarantee setting of land survey monuments and payment to the Preparer of the Map or successor, and MSEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT... in the amount of $44,141.00 to guarantee performance of public sewer improvements. Up to 80% of the amount in 3(a) and 100% of the amounts in 3(bl and 3(c) may be in the form of a Performance Bond issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Twenty percent of the amount in 3(a) has to be in the form of cash, certificates of deposit, a letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Any financial instrument's format is subject to approval. (4) Pay an additional Plan Check Fee of $275.00 for the sheet showing public trail improvements and a Plancheck Deposit of $924.00 for the plan showing public sewer improvements. MM1to /.isg/98- 272i.doc 1 TEL 760 -633 -2600 1 FAX 760 - 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 Too 760 - 633 -2700 lt� recycled paper (5) Pay non - refundable Inspection and Permit Fees and an Inspection Deposit, the latter subject to cost recovery, respectively, as follows: (a)GRADING PERMIT... of $13,581.00, (b)IMPROVEMENT PERMIT... of $930.00, (c)PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT... of $150.00, and (d)SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT... of $924.00. (6) Pay a Flood Control Fee of $13,749.00. The rate is $0.21 /SF and is assessed on the private road improvements to Fortuna Ranch Road and the future Adam's Run. Additional assessments will be levied during the development of the parcels. (7) Provide the name, address, telephone number, and state license number and type of the construction contractor. Construction of public improvements, and otherwise any construction affecting public improvements, is restricted to qualified contractors. Depending on the work to be done, the contractor will need to possess as follows either a valid: (a) Type "A" General Engineering, any work, (b) Type "C -12" Grading & Paving, any surface improvement, or (c) Type "C -34" Pipeline, any sanitary sewer, state license, and meet the minimum insurance requirements as stated on the accompanying handout. (8) Provide proof of any County of San Diego permits required for that portion of the private road improvements to Fortuna Ranch Road lying within unincorporated area. (9) Execute the enclosed Encroachment Maintenance & Removal Covenant. The Engineer of Work will need to prepare Attachments "A" and "B" as per the samples; the proposed improvements to Fortuna Ranch Road lying within both the public right -of -way and the irrevocable offer to dedicate, will need to be described. Pay the applicable Recording Fee, payable to the County Recorder at the rate of $8.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. Submit for approval and recordation. (10) Sign the Permits and the Consent Statement in the enclosed Policy /regarding/ Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreements. The property owner of record must sign the Consent Statement. Any authorized representative of the property owner may sign the Permits. Permits are valid for no more than one year and may expire earlier due to expirations on letters of credit and /or insurance policies. Once the Engineering Permits are issued, advance notice of 48 hours must be given prior to you or your contractor scheduling the mandatory pre - construction conference. See Grading Note 49 and Sewer Note #11. You may want to invite the Project Planner, Bob Scott, who can be contacted at (760) 633 -2713. Informal phasing of the project may necessitate more than one such conference. Excavation and backfill for public water and sewer improvements may be allowed under the Permanent Encroachment Permit provided the contractor is the same. Work in the pipe zone, including the pipe, is the jurisdiction of the special district concerned, the Olivenhain Municipal Water District, by separate arrangement, and the Cardiff Sanitation District, as per DCS360. A separate Right -of -way Construction Permit will be required for any work in the public right - of -way of Fortuna Ranch Road that is not shown on the approved Drawings. Typically, this work may include excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install electric, gas, telephone, and cable television services. A Permit Fee of $250.00 per application and a site plan, preferably MM1to /jsg/98 -272 i.dc c2 JP issued by the public utility, will be required. The contractor license and insurance requirements will remain unchanged. Permits must be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the start of work. Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division, who can be contacted at (760) 633 -2704. Pursuant to Fire Department rules and regulations, prior to any combustible materials being placed on -site, the private roads shall have received their first lift of asphalt paving. Construction changes, prepared by the Engineer of Work, should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposit. Prior to issuance of any Building Permit, a rough grading approval will be needed from the assigned Engineering Inspector. At a minimum, rough grading is defined as certified pad preparation and soil compaction, substantial completion of improvements, and safe access. A proportional reduction of up to 75% of the Security Deposit assigned to the Grading Permit may be merited and forthcoming. As- builts of Drawing 6277 -G and Drawing CS -360, prepared by the Engineer of Work and approved by the Engineering Services Department, will be required prior to Final Inspection and Acceptance Inspections. Verification by the assigned Engineering Inspector of the completion of land survey monuments deferred since approval of the Final Parcel Map, and certification and proof of payment for labor and materials, all by the Preparer of the Map, will be required prior to Final Inspection and Acceptance Inspections. Filing of Comer Records may be required. Submittal, approval, and recordation of a Certificate of Correction will be required if there are any changes in the implementation of Final Parcel Map instructions. Satisfactory resolution of all deferred monument issues will merit release of the Security Deposit assigned. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection with respect to the Grading Permit and Permanent Encroachment Permit is a prerequisite to full release of the corresponding Security Deposit. Please note that Building Permit final inspections are a separate event apart from any Engineering Permit final inspection and are not necessarily coincidental. Satisfactory conclusion of Acceptance Inspections with respect to the Improvement Permit and Sewer Construction Permit and formal acceptance by the City Council and Cardiff Sanitation District Board of Directors are prerequisites to a 75% reduction in the corresponding Security Deposits, and start of the mandatory one -year Warranty Periods. The retentions shall be held for the duration of the Warranty Periods and will be released only after the satisfactory completion of the respective Warranty Inspection. Warranty Inspections cannot be scheduled until after the expiration of the respective Warranty Period. This letter does not change subdivider or successor -in- interest obligations per the proposed Parcel Map. M M /to /jsg/98 -272 i.doc3 This letter is limited in scope. During the Building Permit process, you will need services and be subject to regulation from as follows: the Current Planning Division, Building Inspection Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, and Cardiff Sanitation District, all of the City, and the County Department of Public Works, Olivenhain Municipal Water District, Encinitas Union School District, and San Dieguito Union High School District, all separate public agencies. Please inquire at their respective counters. Additional engineering requirements will be forthcoming during the Building Permit process, including, but not necessarily limited to, coordination of the building site plan with the grading plan, resolution of any outstanding public improvement issues, and assessment and collection of flood control, sanitary sewer, and traffic mitigation fees. Enclosed please find a copy of the Cardiff Sanitation District's policy regarding Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreements. You are hereby notified of the policy. Work to be done per Drawings 6330 -G and 6331 -G, which affect TPM 97 -215 to the northeast, may be substantially dependent on completion of the work to be done pursuant to this letter. Please coordinate. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2780, or you may wish to visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center. Sincerely, W "40 Jeffrey S. Garami Engineering Technician Subdivision Engineering cc Pasco Engineering, Engineer of Work Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Carla Kay, Engineering Inspector Greg Caudill, Engineering Technician permitifile enc Security Obligation Agreement for Subdivision Improvements Security Obligation Agreement for Public Sewer improvements Right-of -way Construction Permit Standard Conditions Requirements for Proof of Insurance Utility Trench Backfill and Resurfacing Standard Policy re: Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreement Encroachment Maintenance & Removal Covenant MM /to /jsg/98 -272 i.doc4 C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S 3INEERING SERVICES DEPART T 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 6277PE PARCEL NO. : 264- 451 -0500 PLAN NO.: 6277 -G JOB SITE ADDRESS: 3540 FORTUNA RANCH RD. APPLICANT NAME ADAM'S RUN LP MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 270649 PHONE NO.: 858- 613 -2990 CITY: SAN DIEGO STATE: CA ZIP: 92198 -0649 CONTRACTOR : BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT INC. PHONE NO.: 619 - 890 -1600 LICENSE NO.: 704370 LICENSE TYPE: B INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE CO POLICY NO. : CLRO50164 POLICY EXP. DATE: 12/15/01 ENGINEER : PASCO ENGINEERING INC. ON• 0.: 858- 259 -8212 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 2/07/01 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 2/07/02 PERMIT ISSUED BY: INSPECTOR: PETER HALL ------------------- - - - - -- PERMIT FEES 6 DEPOSITS ---------------------------- 1. PERMIT FEE 150.00 2. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 3. SECURITY DEPOSIT .00 ------------------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------------- - - - - -- PRIVATE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN FORTUNA RANCH RD DEDICATED RIGHT -OF -WAY /IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE AS PER COVENANT RE: ENCROACHMENT MAINTENANCE /REMOVAL. WORK WITHIN PUBLICLY MAINTAINED PORTION OF FORTUNA RANCH RD (TO END OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS) NOT INCLUDED. SANITARY SEWER/ RECREATIONAL TRAIL BY SEPARATE PERMIT. LETTER DATED SEP 26 2000 APPLIES. - - -- INSPECTION ---------- -- - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. SI N T RE DATE IG ED PRINT NAM �EPHONE NUMBER CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3. OTHER FINAL SUBDIVISON CHECKLIST Map: AVO& A& 1) M TPA `1% -2'12 Developer: Location: FiGfL -cU&4& a 4 C*t R-4 Item By Date Complete Public Works Conditions of Approval Other Department Sign -offs Community Development Community Services — P. "U NIL Fire ty /I /oo InAPS raL Building Sewer District cs o Water District W_. c=e.&%G I/ vi / of California Coastal Permit or Waiver Subdivision Map Certified Improvement Plan Signed Grading Plan Signed Approved Cost Estimate (ACE) Improvement Covenant Executed Grading Covenant Executed Securities Posted ACE SECURITY Amount: $ Type- Amount: $ Type: Amount: $ Type: Processing Deposits Up to Date Subdivision Guarantee yinz Tax Certificate Original Map Mylars (signed with permanent ink) Agenda Report to CAB /Planning Commission After approval by CAB or Planning Commission: Approval by CAB or PC Mylars Signed and Released after 15 day Appeal Period m11039 Ocw To -Se-FF FO(e. ¢ECO�p0.Tro►+ Z /S/ Zcol Daniels Cablevision Inc. P.O. Box 344 Carlsbad, CA 92018 -0344 ift"Ill A11116-r -1v1 An Equal Opportunity Employer' May 22, 2001 City of Encinitas C/o Pascal Engineering 535 N. Hwy 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 RE: Adam's Run, Tentative Map 98 -272 Dear Mr.Uhas: In accordance with your request, Daniels Cablevision, Inc. hereby waives its right to object to omission of signature from the final map for the subject location. Very truly yours, s Carr New Development onnislIr Business Office (760) 438 -7741 • Customer Service (760) 931 -7000 • Fax (760) 438 -8461 5720 El Camino Real • Carlsbad, California 92008 -7298 CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMORANDUM TPM 98 -272 DATE: 2/25/00 TO: Director, Engineering Services Department FROM: Community Development Department SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval 264- 451 -05 (A.P.N.) Fortuna Ranch Road (Address) Benamel / Cardiff Properties (Subdivider) Please be advised that the Community Development Department conditions of Approval for Recordation of a Final Map for Case No. TPM 98 -272as required by Resolution No. DCD 99 -108 have been satisfied. This tentative map expires on 12 -10- 2002. THIS MEMORANDUM MUST BE PROCESSED BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AND RETURNED TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. I /2Vo Signature Date BPmemo.doc 02/25/00 OLIVENHIIN MWD IAN -17 -2081 1J -05 1 Fax:1- 760 -753 -1578 PASCO 'NEERING CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMORANDUM TPM 98-272 DATE: L 225 100 TO: '.actor, Engineering Services Department FROM. �ljvenhain Municipal Water District Jan 17 '01 1 "29 P.01 Please be aajised that the Olivenhain Municipal Water District conditions of Approval for Recordation of a Final Map for Case No. 'iP 914I�as required by Resolution No. DGO 99 -108 ave been satisfied This tentative map expires on J210-2002. THIS MEMORANDtM MUST BE PROCESSED BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AND RETURNED TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Signature i BPmemo.doc� I Date r �t TOTAL P.02 F. - CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMORANDUM TPM 98 -272 DATE: 2/25/00 TO: Director, Engineering Services Department FROM: -' 41� Cow', Community Services Department SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval 264 -451 -05 (A.P.N.) Fortuna Ranch Road (Address) Benamel / Cardiff Properties (Subdivider) Please be advised that the Community Services Department conditions of Approval for Recordation of a Final Map for Case No. TPM 98 -272as required by Resolution No. DCD 99 -108 have been satisfied. This tentative map expires on 12 -10 -2002. THIS MEMORANDUM MUST BE PROCESSED BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AND RETURNED TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. Signature Date BPmemo.doc 02/25/00 CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMORANDUM TPM 98 -272 DATE. 2/25/00 TO: Director, Engineering Services Department FROM: brill l W V%) D 0 P—AE Encinitas Fire Department SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval 264 - 451 -05 (A. P. N.) Fortuna Ranch Road (Address) Benamel / Cardiff Properties (Subdivider) JAN 18 2001 Please be advised that the Encinitas Fire Department conditions of Approval for Recordation of a Final Map for Case No. TPM 98 -272as required by Resolution No. DCD 99 -108 have been satisfied. This tentative map expires on 12 -10 -2002. THIS MEMORANDUM MUST BE PROCESSED BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AND RETURNED TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. 0 Signature BPmemo.doc > 2 / //D D Date 02/25/00 Sempra Energy City of Encinitas JAN i a 2001 Engineering Dept. "5 So. Vulcan Avenue ENG NNEIMING EPVIi Encinitas, CA 92024 pITV f F FNCINI7 November 20, 2000 RE: CIY OF ENCINITAS TENTATIVE MAP NO. 98-272 Please be advised that the division of the property shown on Tentative Map No. 98-272 will not unreasonable interfere with the free and complete exercise of any easement(s), held by San Diego Gas & Electric Company within the boundaries of said map. This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company's rights, title and of the provisions contained in said easement(s), or a waiver of costs for relocation of any interest in and to said easement(s), nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any aMcted facilties. In the event that the development requires relocation of facilities, on the subject property, which facilities exist by right of easement or otherwise, the owner or ownerideveloper will be requested to bear the costs of such relocation and provide SDG&E with suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replaocmct rights arc required prior to the performance of the relocation. If additional information is requited in connection with the above mentioned subject, please call Rolanda Hayward at ( 858) 6541256, I am employed by Sempra Energy as a duly authorized agent for San Diego Gas & Electric. Respectfully, Rolanda F. Hayward Administrative Associate,, Duly Authorized AgertXor SDG&E Land Management Cc: Pascoe Engineering Sempra Energy" City of Encinitas SOS So. Vulmu Ave. crr�FOF,ac Encinitas, CA 92024 FN�iN rq %F; Right of Way Arrangements for Tentative Map 98-272 Navember 20,20M The map referred tom the above Tentative Map has been reviewed and arrangements for right -of - -way bave been made by the developer. For additional inforxrtation, please contact me at (858) 654 -I256. Rotanda F. HaywasdX� Administrative t mociate Duty Authorized Agent For SDG &E Land Management Cc: Pascoe Engineering TOTAL P.03 �is•�y' ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT -OF -WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT STANDARD CONDITIONS The following standard conditions are apart of Permit No. o�! /. 4 � 1. No access or work shall be performed within the City right -of -way without the full knowledge of the assigned City Inspector who shall be given not less than 48 hours advance notice of the initiation of permitted use at (760) 633 -2796 or 633 -2797 as stated on the permit. 2. At least 48 hours prior to starting work, Underground Service Alert (USA) shall be notified for location of underground utilities at 1- 8004224133. The proposed dig area must be premarked in white paint prior to contacting (USA). 3. All work covered by this permit shall be performed by a contractor possessing a valid California contractor's license of the appropriate class. 4. All traffic control within the construction area shall be subject to an approved traffic control plan and shall be flagged and barricaded to the satisfaction of the City Inspector in compliance with the "Work Area Traffic Control Handbook ", latest edition published by Building News, Inc. In the event that the Inspector determines proper traffic control is not in place, all work shall cease and permince authorizes the Director of Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative to order, on the rental basis, such traffic control devices as shall be necessary and proper to protect the public safety and further agrees to pay any and all costs and charges that the City may incur in providing said traffic control. 5. Applicant agrees that it shall be his responsibility to provide the contractor, subcontractor or any other agent responsible for construction of permitted works within the City right - of -way, with a copy of the permit including these standard conditions and a complete set of approved plans. The permit, plans and Work Area Traffic Control Handbook shall be available at the permit site whenever work is in progress. 6. Permitted works shall be constructed in accordance with the City specifications and approved plans subject to inspection and approval by the Director of Engineering Services or his dully authorized representative. Certification for all materials and work, including compaction tests, shall be furnished by the applicant upon request by the City Inspector. Any compaction testing shall be paid for by the permitter. Certification shall be made by a certified testing agency or firth acceptable to the City. 7. No work within the public right -of- -way is permitted on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Any deviation from the work schedule presented in these conditions must receive prior, written approval of the Director of Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative. Any questions regarding days City Hall is closed, call (760) 633 -2770. 8. No work on any public roadway, excluding prime arterials and major roads, shall be started before 7:30 A.M. or continue after 5:00 P.M. on weekdays. 9. No work shall begin before 9:00 A.M. or continue after 3:00 P.M. on prime arterials and major roads unless authorized on the permit by the Director of Engineering Services. All work on prime arterials and major roads will require an. approved traffic control plan by the City Traffic Engineer. 10. The roadway shall be clean and free of all obstructions and completely open to traffic at the end of each working day. (No later than 3:00 P.M. on prime arterials and major roads.) 11. Two -way traffic shall be maintained at all times. If street width prevents maintaining two -way traffic, pemtittee and Director of Engineering Services shall agree on an adequate traffic control plan prior to starting work. 12. All excavations in existing pavement shall be saw cut to neat lines and AC replacement shall be made to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services or hi 'v authorized representative. 13. Open trench must be backfilled and capped with at least 2" of cold mix asphalt or t...,,al plated according to City specifications during non - working hours. Metal plates are required to have cold mix asphalt ramps on all (4) sides and must be maintained. 14. Native material may be used upon approval of the Director of Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative. 15. Two sack sand- cement slurry backfill shall be required when tunneling under curb and gutter or other improvements not designated for removal. 16. Two sack sand- cement slurry mix shall be required as backfill on all lateral excavations within prime arterials, major roads and collectors as well as all locations where the inspector deems the native material to be unacceptable for use as backfill. 17. Care shall be exercised to prevent water, soil and debris from depositing in gutters, streets and storm drains. No washing out of mixers or concrete pumps will be allowed on City streets. 18. Any roadway striping damaged or removed during the operations of this permit shall be matched and replaced by the applicant using the latest edition of Cal -Trans specifications for paint to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative. 19. All concrete work shall be transit mixed and conforming to the Standard Specific for Public Works Construction, Latest Edition, Section 201, and approved b� ..\e Director of Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative. 20. Trenching for installations across any intersecting roadway open to traffic shall be progressive. Not more than half of the width of a traveled roadway shall be disturbed at one time and the remaining width shall be kept open to traffic by bridging or backfilling. 21. Where street dimensions and State Health Services Department regulations allow, all pipes and conduits laid parallel to the roadway shall be placed at least five (5) feet from the edge of the pavement or graded traveled roadway, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the Director of Engineering Services. The shallowest portion of any pipeline or other facility shall be installed not less than thirty (30) inches below the roadway surface. JSG /ARR/Std_Con.doc/01.05.00 Page I oft ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT -OF -WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT STANDARD CONDITIONS 21(a). Where street dimensions and State Health Services Department regulations allow, 22 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. all pipes and conduits laid parallel to existing utilities shall maintain a minimum separation of three feet measured from the nearest edge of the facility. Any deviation from this requirement is not allowed unless approved by the Director of Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative. All excavated material shall be cast away from the improved portion of the highway. After the work has been completed, all excess material, including excess excavation, shall be removed from the right -of -way. The roadway shall be left in neat and orderly condition. All roadside drainage ditches shall be restored to true grades and the intake and outlet ends at all culverts shall be left free from all excess materials and debris. All approaches to private driveways and intersecting roads and streets shall be kept open to traffic at all times, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Engineering Services. Clay and earth which adhere to the paved surface of the roadway shall be removed by hand scraping, washing and sweeping, or by any other method which will leave a clean non -skid surface without impairing, injuring or loosening the surface. Pennittee shall comply with any and all directives issued by the Director of Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative in order to prevent dust or other materials from becoming a nuisance or annoyance. Temporary patching of trench is required on lateral cuts in surfaced streets immediately after backftlling. After completion of the refilling and compacting of the backfill material in the excavation as specified and the removal of the obstruction, the permittee shall promptly replace with temporary or permanent patching material or repair any portion of the highway surface removed or damaged by the excavation, obstruction or construction operations to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services, and as specified elsewhere herein, or the Director of Engineering Services may, at his option, elect to do the surfacing or repairing himself with the permittee bearing the cost of such work. Temporary patching material may be left in place for up to 30 days, but must be continually maintained. Where the pavement, except Portland Concrete Cement pavement, or surface has been removed by others, the permittee shall replace it with a standard repair of four (4) inches AC over approved backfill or repair section shall be one (1) inch AC greater than existing structural section, whichever is greater. If, after the refilling of an excavation the permittee fails or refuses to resurface or repair that portion of the surface of the roadway damaged by him, or if the Director of Engineering Services has elected to do such resurfacing or repairing the Director of Engineering Services shall cause the repair to occur and the permittee shall be charged with the cost thereof computed by the Director of Engineering Services. When shoring is required, an engineered detail drawing will be required for approval by the Director of Engineering Services. All OSHA regulations shall be met. 31. This permit may be immediately revoked for reasons in the best interest of the City for violation of permit conditions or for the creation of a nuisance upon notice given by the Director of Engineering Services or his authorized representative. In the event of such revocation, applicant shall immediately cease all operations and restore City right -of -way as directed by the Director of Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative. After notification, City may take full possession of the area. Applicant shall pay to the City any and all costs involved in the event restoration of City property or removal of any items installed by the applicant are necessary by the city. 32. This permit may become void in the event the use permitted is not started within sixty (60) calendar days from the date of issuance or in the event the permitted use is abandoned for a period exceeding sixty (60) calendar days after construction has be, In such event, it shall be necessary to obtain a new permit and pay additional fees. U commencement of work, all operations, including cleanup and restoration of City right - of -way, shall be completed within the time limit specified by the permit. 33. The permittee guarantees to save, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Encinitas and all its agents, officers, employers and officials against all liabilities, judgments, costs and expenses which may in any manner or form arise in consequent of the issue of this permit or any work performed in consequence thereof. 34. The permittee guarantees all work constructed, installed and effected under this permit for a period of one year from the date of final inspection. Any repairs required during the guarantee period shall be made at the expense of the permince. At the option of the Director of Engineering Services, repair work may be performed by either the permittee or the City. 35. Perminee has read, understands and agrees to comply with all construction permit provisions and standard conditions. 1SG /ARK/Std_Con doc /0 L05.00 Page 2 of 2 70 FZ- i PM CITYOFENCINITAS ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL Sewer Construction Policy Title: Reimbursement Agreements Section: General Responsible Department: Engineering Services Number: G042 Approved By: City Manager Date Approved: 6/17/99 Last Amendment: I. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This policy provides specific regulations and procedures for establishing Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreements (Agreements). H. LEGAL AUTHORIZATION Chapter 18.12 of the City's Municipal Code and Cardiff Sanitation District Code allow the City or District (herein referred to as " District" for both the Cardiff Sanitation District or Encinitas Sanitary Division) to enter into Agreements with private developers or property owners (OWNER) to charge an additional connection fee for connection to the sewer system (REIMBURSEMENT FEE), when the sewer service has been made available by that OWNER prior to the time that the District would have been able to make the sewer service available. The purpose of the REIMBURSEMENT FEE is to reimburse the OWNER for a portion of the costs incurred to extend the District's sewer lines to the previously unserved area. The District does not provide Agreements for OWNERS building private sewer lines. When an OWNER desires or is required to construct a sewer line (SEWER LINE) to the District's sewer system, and other unserved properties may be serviced by that SEWER LINE, the District Engineer may require the OWNER to construct the SEWER LINE to public standards and provide stub -outs at various locations to provide a connection point for the unserved properties. The District may also require the OWNER to dedicate the SEWER LINE to the District before the OWNER may discharge into the District's sewer system. The OWNER shall be informed of these requirements before final sewer plans are approved and shall have the option of entering into an Agreement. The DISTRICT shall notify the OWNER, in writing, of the District's requirements and policies concerning Agreements. By providing a copy of this policy statement to the OWNER, the City shall have given sufficient written notification. The decision to enter into an Agreement shall be agreed upon by both parties prior to the issuance of a sewer construction permit. The OWNER shall agree to the terms of the Agreement, as stipulated by the Municipal or Cardiff Sanitation District Code and Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreement Policy, by signing the Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreement Consent Statement at the end of this document. Should the OWNER not consent to the Agreement policies and codes, the District may deny the OWNER a sewer construction permit and access to the District's public sewer system. Page l of 4 III. TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT The proposed sewer shall be designed in compliance with public standards and as directed by the District Engineer. All public sewer access easements must be secured prior to the commencement of construction of the SEWER LINE. The OWNER shall incur all costs associated with the construction of the sewer including, but not limited to, design, acquisition of easements or right -of -way, construction, inspection, material testing, permits, and legal, technical, or administrative assistance. The OWNER must also pay an administrative fee to the District for setting up the Agreement. The OWNER will be required to open a deposit account with the District in the amount of $1,000. The District will charge against the deposit account on a time and materials basis until the Agreement is finalized. The OWNER shall retain copies of all invoices pertaining to the sewer construction and proof of payment of these invoices. Copies of invoices and proof of payment shall be submitted to the District Engineer after all reimbursable invoices have been paid by the OWNER, but no more than 90 days after the SEWER LINE has been accepted by the District. Reimbursable costs shall ultimately be determined by the District Engineer and may include payments made by the OWNER for preliminary engineering, right -of -way or easement acquisition, permits, material testing, construction, inspection, and installation related to the SEWER LINE. IV. CALCULATION OF THE REIMBURSEMENT FEE The District Engineer shall determine the number of equivalent dwelling units (EDUs) that could ultimately connect to the SEWER LINE, including the OWNER's property. The number of EDUs shall be based on the existing zoning at the time that the SEWER LINE is constructed and shall assume that vacant properties will be developed to mid -range density allowed by the zoning. The REIMBURSEMENT FEE shall be calculated by dividing the total reimbursable costs, as determined by the District Engineer, by the total number of possible EDU connections to the SEWER LINE. If the reimbursable costs of the SEWER LINE total $100,000 and there are 10 potential EDU* Connections to the SEWER LINE, the REIMBURSEMENT FEE is $10,000 per EDU. Total Reimbursable Costs (as approved by District Engineer): Total Possible EDU Connections: Reimbursement Fee: $100,000 10 5100,000/10 = $10,000 per EDU *Generally, one (1) EDU is equivalent to one house In addition, property owners subject to the REIMBURSEMENT FEE shall also be required to pay 6% simple interest on the REIMBURSEMENT FEE, to be computed from the time that the SEWER LINE was accepted by the District. The District shall charge for setting up the Agreement on a time and materials basis and shall charge a collection fee for each reimbursement collected and sent to the OWNER as set by the District's adopted fee schedule. Page 2 of 4 A property owner wishes to build a sewer lateral from his single - family house to the SEWER LINE 3 years and 3 months after the SEWER LINE is accepted by the District. How is the interest fee calculated? Interest Calculation: Reimbursement Fee x Interest Rate x Time 10,000 x 0.06 x 3.25= $1,950 Total Reimbursement: $10,000 +$1,950= $11,950 Reimbursement to OWNER: $11,950 less Collection Fee The REIMBURSEMENT FEE shall be collected in addition to all applicable fees. The OWNER's property shall also be subject to the reimbursement fee, however this fee will be deducted from the total reimbursable costs, rather than collected at a future time. The total reimbursement to OWNER shall not exceed the maximum reimbursement amount. The maximum reimbursement amount is defined as the total reimbursable costs plus interest, less the OWNER's pro -rata share of the cost of the SEWER, less collection fees. The District does not guarantee that the OWNER will receive the full amount, or any portion, of the maximum reimbursement amount. EXAMPLE. If the reimbursable costs total $100,000 and there are 10 potential EDU connections and two of the EDUs belong to the OWNER, the cost attributed to the OWNER is $20,000 and the total reimbursable amount to the OWNER is $80,000, plus 6% simple interest, less the District's collection fee. Total Reimbursable Costs Reimbursement Fee per EDU: Total Possible EDU Connections: Total EDUs belonging to OWNER Cost to OWNER: Total Reimburseable amount: $100,000 $10,000 10 2 $10,000 X 2 = $20,000 $100,000 - $20,000 = $80,000 (plus interest and less collection fees) If the District collects any REIMBURSEMENT FEES, such payments shall be sent to the OWNER semi - annually commencing on January I or July 1, whichever comes first following the effective date of the Agreement and shall continue semi - annually on January I and July I, until the OWNER has been reimbursed the maximum reimbursable amount or until the agreement expires. In accordance with the Municipal and Cardiff Sanitation District Codes 18.12.030, if the reimbursable costs of the SEWER LINE are less than $50,000 the Agreement shall remain in effect for a period of 10 years. If the total reimbursable costs of the SEWER LINE are $50,000 or more, the Agreement shall remain in effect for a period of 20 years. Page 3 of 4 V. OVERVIEW OF PROCESS The process for Agreement adoption is summarized below: ❑ OWNER meets with District Engineer or Engineering Services Department staff to discuss alternatives for connection to the public Sewer System. ❑ District Engineer and OWNER agree on conceptual design and location of sewer. ❑ If the proposed sewer may serve other unserved properties, the OWNER is notified of the Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreement Policy and is issued the policy statement and consent form. ❑ OWNER signs consent form, designs the sewer to approved standards and specifications, and provides a cost estimate to the District Engineer. ❑ Properties that may be affected by the sewer reimbursement agreement are notified. ❑ Sewer construction plans are submitted to District Engineer for approval. ❑ Once sewer plans are approved and consent form is received, the District issues a sewer construction permit and SEWER LINE is completed. ❑ Upon completion, the District accepts the SEWER LINE and the SEWER LINE is dedicated to the District. ❑ Proof of payment for reimbursable costs are submitted to District Engineer, within 90 days of the District's acceptance of the SEWER LINE. ❑ District Engineer calculates REIMBURSEMENT FEE and draws up agreement. • Ordinance adopting the Agreement is scheduled for Introduction and notices are sent to affected property owners. • Ordinance is introduced and adopted by District. ❑ Both parties sign agreement and Municipal or Cardiff Sanitation District Code is amended to include Agreement. If during this process a property owner wishes to connect to the SEWER LINE, prior to the issuance of a Wastewater Discharge Permit, the District will collect an amount equal to the proposed REIMBURSEMENT FEE or the City's best estimate if a REIMBURSEMENT FEE has not yet been calculated. Those funds will then be placed into a deposit account until the Agreement goes into effect. VI. OWNER CONSENT STATEMENT 1 v h n 5 yev,.loc� have read and understand the policies governing Sewer (Please print name.) Construction Reimbursement Agreements in the Cardiff Sanitation District and Encinitas Sanitary Division. t agree to the terms set forth in this policy and consent to any and all regulations, red and set forth by the Cardiff Sanitation District or the Municipal Code/City Council. /- /T' Date Page 4 of 4 BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT 8586132999 P.O. Box 270649 San Diego, CA 92198-0649 Phone: 85M132990 x 104 Fax: 858 -01329% www.beaMel.com john @benamel cone Fm 09/07 ft 1' O 01/01 Benamel Development, Inc TO: Encinitas Planning Department From: John Sjverwood Street Name Division FaX 76"332818 Date: September 7, 2000 Phone- 7606332713 Page" 1 Re- TPM: 98-272, Atlam's Run CC.. O Urgent 0 For Review ❑ Please Camment 10 Please Reply! O Please Reaycla -Comments: To Whom it May Concern, Our choice for the Private Street Name for the Project is "Adam's Run" Our alternative name is "Alta Fortuna Place" Please call me if these names are unacceptable and we will immediately forward additional alternatives. Thank you, John Silverwood 1 .AJG, 1.2902 12:34uv RECOPM AT THc REQUEST IN ttuCAC-o rITtE Co. RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF ENCINITAS N0. 3676 P. 2 00s5so OD8 # 2-001 - 0833297 ) NOV 15, 2001 1:10 P.M I; WHEN RR CORDED MAIL TO: ) CITY CLERK ) CITY OF ENCINITAS ) 505 SOUTH VULCAN AVENUE ) ENCINITAS. CA 92024__ For the benefit of the City of Encinitas OFFICIAL REMfQ SPH DIM COU(iY ItTLDRbt]t'S OrrF10E GFf y J. DUH, CCrtt1Y lu'o DER FEES: 0.00 M: MA I�Il�lpu{1 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 264- 4 51 -os PROJECT NO. 98-272 GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR RECREATIONAL TRAILS A. ADMIS RUN L. P. ( "OWNER ", hereinafter) is the owner of real property described in Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and made apart hereof ("PROPERTY" hereinafter). For valuable consideration, OWNER hereby gents to the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), (for the benefit of CITY), easements across PROPERTY located as described in Exhibit "B ", which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, for Public Recreational Trail purposes which include, without limitation, use by members of the public to walk, jog, run, ride horses, and operate non - motorized bicycles. However, co motorcycles or other motor vehicles shall be permitted on the t-.aills with the exception of emergency and maintenance vehicles. B. CITY agrees to properly and safely maintain the trails and related improvements to a level satisfactory to serve sufficiently the public need. Construction and maintenance activities include, but are not limited to, work on, below, and above ti:e surface of the easements. C. Pursuant to a permit issued by the CITY, private owners of lots adjacent to the easement grarned to the CITY may construct and maintain driveways and install underground utilities across the easement, subject to the following conditions: 1) No culverts, beans, ditches or other fee nn- may impede or restrict the intended use of the trail, shall be permitted f Il l 19 P 2 n n n is AUG 5 2002 D/ CITY r SD:200100833297 OS/01/200212.22PM I of AUG. 1.2002 12:34PM N0.3676 F. 3 ' 008551 2) The surface of any driveway which crosses the easement must be smoothed to a level satisfactory to the Director of Community Services. 3) The grade of any driveway which crosses the easement must match the grade of the trail on both sides. D. CITY agrees to defend, indemnify, and save free and hold harmless OWNER from and against all claims, liabilities, penalties, fines, or any damage to goods, properties, or effects of and person whatever, and for personal injuries or death caused by, or resulting from, or claimed to have been caused by, or msulting from the negligence or intentional act of CITY. E. This easement shall rust with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the encu mbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representative, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. F. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce tie provisions of this easement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full mirnbursement of all costs, includi onable attorney's fees, from the other party, % Dated / / ©r Owner la cS; I t1 e✓ ,3 ooA F Signature of Owners to be notarized. Attach the appropriate acknowledgements. E TLS I certify on behalf of the City Council of the City of Encinitas, pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution of said Council, adapted on November 9, 1994, that the City of Encinias consents to the making of the foregoing Grant of Easement for Recreational Trails, accepts the easement granted thereon, and consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. DATE: / /��I41 BY: Leroy C. sodas Director of Engineering Services - SD:2001 00833297 08/01/2002 12:22 PM 2 of 5 AUG. 1.2002 12:34PM N0. 3676 F. 4 CALIFORIM ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLE=DGMENT ,.� :. ^ r Canty of on--!L 1 -. P. personally aPPeared 008552 9`personaliy larown tD me —OR —O proved to me on the basis of satisfactory WdenCe to be the pers0n(14 whose name($] islare subscribed to Ira witliin instrument and acknowledged to rrte that hdsho" executed the juuAA HiT LER seine in hieMeNWeir authorized capaCAy¢es). and tltadby a C4emeheleati17993ea hisfherAheirsignature poon the instrturrml the personM, € e or the entity upon behalf Df which the persons) acted. �� lbMorrrmFWMDAPM executed the instrument WRNESS my hand and official seal. ^� Sq.M� • navy 11rit f�Piln Dwo ow wwMadw below is nvr r oww by Orr a May P" 4ehrabre b prrrurn rays m ne "Ovie+w ►n mrid prerer)t NK A/wrr.erraW end nerbeARMrrr Or 06 bmr b 48001W dp� Description of Attached Document TrtiaorTypeofibcument- �'- �rnrt.( r.� EncnmoA+ �oY grsan(ionc. V(ar`S Document Date: 11- 1 L) ? no) I Number of Paget Z Signer(s) Oder Then Named Above: {,Ql��5 Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: 0 Individual Corporate Officer Trle(s): ❑ Partner — d t rnked WCeneral Cl Aromey -In -Fact 0 Trustee 0 Guardian a Conservator ❑ Other. TOP ar.mehre Signer Is Representing: ,sr- Signer's Name: I ■ r ■ Individual Corporate Officer Titte(# Partner — O !.united O General Attorneyan -Fad Trustee Guardian or Conservator Other. Signer Is Representing a 01tN NfIMYMWIAYKOYr' �A — .1.O M. r. Corn I.eu -- —. - SD:2001 00833297 08/01/2002 12:22 PM 3 of 5 AUG. 1. 2002 12:35PM 0.- � 553 EXHIBIT "A" RECREATIONAL TRAIL EASEMENT AN EASEMENT FOR RECREATIONAL TRAIL EASEMENT PURPOSES OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18712 IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED MAY 25,2001 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF FORTUNA RANCH ROAD AND ADAMS RUN AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP N0.18712; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ADAMS RUN Nsrso'28 "W 30.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID FORTUNA RANCH ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY N32°09'32 "E 3536 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY N320 09'32 "E 21.04 FEET; THENCE NOI'40'44 "E 1.12 FEET; THENCE N57 050'28 "W 48.72 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 32.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE WESTERLY 22.16 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °40'40'; THENCE S82°28'52 'W 16.25 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 28.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE WESTERLY 26.39 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54 °00'00' TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY SIDELINE OF THAT RECRETATION TRAIL. EASEMENT AS DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS ON SAID PARCEL MAP 18712; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE S46 026'52 "W 12.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF SAM ADAMS RUN. SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF CUSP OF A TANGENT 40.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE EASTERLY 37,70 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54 °00'00" , THENCE N82 028'52 "E 16.25 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE EASTERLY 13.85 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAD) CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39.40'40 "; THENCE S57 °50'28'T 3919 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 10.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHERLY 15.71 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 °00'00' TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. i ha 211 - SD:2001 00833297 08/01/2002 12:22 PM 4 of 5 AJG. 1. 2002 12:35PM r N0.3676 P. 6 0085& LAN ' RE0:E4 TIONAL � � C y rF` R' TRAIL EASENDYT fS 5211 Exy. Q6/30103 r r CF CA'� ! PARCEL 3 PARCEL 3� PM. 18712 PM. 18712 1 W PARCEL 4 x PM. 18712 , R �I �a 21.04 35.3x' vlCIIlm KV'0932E 56.40' Wi 40'44E „P t.� �"' $ ' T a M Pony T er:;;MM CENTERLINE FORTUNA RANCH ROAD PA= EMDED7DS It M N�l12 5tE. a 31J111h BECK CA 92075 FE 732Q6 SA:2001 00833297 08/01/2002 12.22 FM '5 of 5 Recording Requested By: THE LKIGINAL OF THIS DOOKK IIAS REIXJ<tDED ON APR 03, 2001 MEMT NUMBER 2001- 0197431 GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE City Planner ) TINE: 10:41 AN When Recorded Mail To: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas. CA 92024 _) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY FUTURE PARK, TRAFFIC, AND FLOOD CONTROL FEES Assessor's Parcel Number: 264- 4 SI -OS-oo Project No. TPM 98 -272 A. Adam's Run L.P. ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TPM 98 -272 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows: See Attachment "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of Final Map approval for the above referenced project by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment "B" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the other party. Covxxxxx F. Failure of the OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. G. Upon OWNER's satisfaction of OWNER's duties and obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and CITY shall execute a "Satisfaction of Covenant ". H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: A a AM 5 1?G1 Q %J OWNERS *+�OO�O�" C,P GErt/ERAL r"�+t'iN�ER ti7'.t/ Pre a ;�Qe,dT �%� �r �,� ✓e rwoe� Dated _N"- 4 XaQ0 Dated Dated (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached) ATTACH NOTARY HERE CITY OF ENCINITAS Datedff4 -0 2 wb4 by :E ��d�•nc�...- (Notarization not required) Bill Weedman, City Planner CALIFORNIA ALL- PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Stale of CA4. i F0r2Niq County of �iEGi O On OV. S- 7 000 before me, ibaiCS K SwS"%5pyl ,NOT -AKV fir c o.l. Nr a Tb cd Wlwr(ey..' ow, Notary EIC) personalty appeared -TV4H F 5iLvE72WOoD Name(a(.1 sgxr(s) 0 personally known to me - OR - Kproved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/aw subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/zheAhey executed the same in hisR>, Ml it authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/Aer#k+eicsignature(e) on the instrument the person(&), 1ANICE IL sVdNSON or the entity upon behalf of which the person(e) acted, mss. ter executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. sy.w.drearvw� TONAL Thpgh do iNormatlon below is not required by law, it may prove V&kmbN b persons rei)*V on On doc w r and coudd prvvem haudulent rmrovar and martachrnent or dris roan to anoTav dk a enL Description of Attach Title or Type of Document: Document Date: � 4(�-O o D Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer's Name: M1+H F S- iLVEpG/DOD O Individual ZCorporate Officer Tite(s): FkESi DE-N� ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact O Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other Top or enrnb hero Signer Is Representing: P5f--c- Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): 1 Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Attomey -in -Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: GT TU1ePRINT F NGOSI6VEn ATTACHMENT "A" TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -272 THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHIVEST QUAR"1 I:K OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 \VEST, SAN BEILNARDINO BASE AND NIERIDI4\', IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TG UNITED STATES GOVERN. -MENT SURVEY. Recording Requested By: City of Encinitas When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT WS RECORDED ON AFii 03, 2001 DOCUMENT HUMBER 2001 - 0197430 GREGORY J. SMITH. COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 10:41 AM SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP Assessor's Parcel No. 264 -451 -05 Project No: 98 -272 TPM A. Adam's Run LP ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is known as the Adam's Run Subdivision ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment A, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of the approval of permit 98 -272 TPM by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit as follows: See Attachment B, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. g:cov /98272TPM D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attomeys' fees, from the other party. F. Failure of OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. G. Upon OWNER's satisfaction of OWNER's duties and obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and CITY shall execute a Satisfaction of Covenant. H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED Dated signature is attached.) CITY OF ENCINITAS 41WIM 11 — O � G E>vFR�� Pam ,t-)ER, Owy /-- p Dated i by Bill Weedman (Notarization not required) City Planner g:cov /98272TPM CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Cc I ft r n I cct Canty of JQ r� r CJ On 12 1b -2000 before me, JUkQ A L44kr t�ofClu wb)IC_, Dale Name and Tae M OBlur,a 9.! h Dae. Nola,,, Pubftl personalty appeared ipersonally (mown to me — OR — ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) / whose name(s) istare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sheAhey executed the same in his/herAheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by AuAA IUiRUR his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), comnrknattnble or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, INIA" P r�i cec� executed the instrument - bb Come BQ*69 Mr 72. 4001 WETNESS my hand and official seal- 6lynean a Naary wean OPTIONAL rhmo ns Y1rnmmbw below m not requ"d by law, X may prom vakable b persms rek/M on ne doninanf and cmdd pnav" Iraudwerw removal and marrachment or Vw Ibrrn lo anonw docwnent Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: 22 Document Dale: 12 1,4 co Number of Pages: z tr �scfll9f rv✓ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Lit I eadnvon . Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: 3�hnr,Sdyen,,t �d . O Individual O Corporate Officer Tile(s): Partner — O Limited �A General Anomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee O Guardian or Conservator F3 Other: Signer Is Representing: AJa„ s Rvn L_ RIGHT TNUNISPRINT OF SIGNER IS Name: O Individual O Corporate Officer Title(s): • Partner — ❑ Limited • Attomey -in -Fad • Trustee ❑ General ❑ Guardian or Conservator O Other. Signer Is Representing: 0 1994 Naeon al N9an, Amon &a • 52M Remmel Ave PO Boe 7184 • Canoga Pad. CA 91309 7184 Prod. No. 5987 Rewder Call Tolb Frw 1 880.876 6C7 ATTACHMENT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY VEINS OR LODES, OF QUARTZ, OR OTHER ROCK, IN PLACE BEARING GOLD, SILVER, CINNABAR, LEAD, TIN, COPPER OR OTHER VALUABLE DEPOSITS WITHIN THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED AS KNOWN TO EXIST ON OR PRIOR TO MARCH 9, 1925. PARCEL 2: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, NORTH 88 009'47" EAST, APPROXIMATELY 125.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 20.00 FOOT EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1 IN DEED TO OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED MAY 3, 1961 AS FILE NO. 76608 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 3: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. PARCEL 4: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AND WITHIN LOT 16 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1898, ALL BEING IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16 AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 6085, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 14, 1962, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 03 057'39" EAST, 1029.04 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESIGNATED AS POINT "A "; THENCE SOUTH 86 000'00" WEST, 149.53 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 6085 AND BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RETRACING NORTH 86 000'00" EAST, 149.53 FEET TO SAID POINT "A" ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 86 000'00" EAST, 130.41 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38 017'20 ", A DISTANCE OF 132.70 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 47 042'40" EAST, 408.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 051'20" A DISTANCE OF 139.12 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87 034'00" EAST 254.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 006'20" A DISTANCE OF 210.36 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 63 027'40" EAST, 292.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 012'03" A DISTANCE OF 84.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87 039'43" EAST, 640.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, NORTH 87 015'43" EAST, 1321.28 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5. SAID EASEMENT TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN THE CENTER LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AND TO TERMINATE EASTERLY IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION S. PARCEL 5: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, OVER A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 , SAN OF SAN DIEGO, W STATE OFBECALLIIDFORNIA, ACCCOORDINGD TO I UNITED STA ES SOUTH, RANGE 3 GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID 60.00 FOOT STRIP BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4. ATTACHMENTB OWNER'S OBLIGATIONS AND DUTIES The property owner /developer shall obtain design review permits through the City for homes to be constructed on the lots resulting from the approved map, as well as all related site improvements. If the property owner /developer elects to develop the lots resulting from the approved final map as custom homesites, the design review permit requirement may be waived by the Community Development Department pursuant to Section 23.08.030 (7) of the Municipal Code. g:cov /98272TPM TIE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCIAENT AS RECORDED ON APR 03, 2001 DOD" NIIFM 2001 - 01974299 Recording Requested By: ) GREGORY J. SMITH' COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 10:41 AN City Engineer ) When Recorded Mail to: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas. CA 92024 1 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDERS USE ONLY PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR TPM 98 -272 Assessor s Parcel No. 26'/ gSl '6�s' co ProjectNo.: TPM 98 -272 W.O.No.: THIS AGREEMENT for the maintenance and repair of that certain private road easement, the legal description and/or plat of which is set forth in Exhibits rA" attached hereto and made a part hereof, is entered into byADA WS RUM 1 r P _(hereinafter referred to as "Developer ") for the benefit of future subdivision lot owners who will use the private road easement (hereinafter referred to as "lot owners ", which shall include the Developer to the extent the Developer retains any ownership interest in any lot or lots). WHEREAS, this Agreement is required as a condition of approval by the City of Encinitas of a subdivision project as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources code and pursuant to City of Encinitas Municipal Code Section 24.16.060 and Section 24.29.040; and WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of certain real property being subdivided and developed as TPM 98 -272 that will use and enjoy the benefit of said road easement. A complete legal description of said real property is attached, labelled Exhibit, and incorporated by reference. Said real property is hereinafter referred to as the "property "; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Developer that said private road be maintained in a safe and usable condition by the lot owners; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Developer to establish a method for the maintenance and repair of said private road easement and for the apportionment of the expense of such maintenance and repair among existing and future lot owners; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Developer that this Agreement constitute a covenant running with the land, binding upon each successive lot owner of all or any portion of the property. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: .1. The property is benefited by this Agreement, and present and successive lot owners of all or any portion of the property are expressly bound hereby for the benefit of the land. 2. The cost and expense of maintaining the private road easement shall be divided equally among the subdivided parcels created in the subdivision and paid by the lot owner of the heirs, assigns and successors in interest or each such owner. 3. In the event any of the herein described parcels of land are subdivided further, the lot owners, heirs, assigns and successors in interest of each such newly created parcel shall be liable under this Agreement for their then pro rata share of expenses and such pro rata shares of expenses shall be computed to reflect such newly created parcels. 4. The repairs and maintenance to be performed under this Agreement shall be limited to the following unless the consent for additional work is agreed to by a majority vote of the lot owners owning 100% of the number of parcels, including subdivisions thereof as described in Paragraph 3 above: reasonable and normal road improvement and maintenance work to adequately maintain said private road easement to permit all- weather access and conveyance of storm flows. Repairs and maintenance under this Agreement shall include, but is not limited to, filling of chuckholes, repairing cracks, repairing and resurfacing of roadbeds, repairing and maintaining drainage structures, removing debris, maintaining signs, markers, striping and lighting, if any, and other work reasonably necessary and proper to repair and preserve the easement for all- weather road purposes. 5. If there is a covenant, agreement, or other obligation imposed as a condition of subdivision approval to make private road improvements to the private road easement, the obligation to repair and maintain the private road easement as herein set forth shall commence when the private road improvements have been completed and approved by the City. 6. Any extraordinary repair required to correct damage to said road easement that results from action taken or contracted for by lot owners or their successors in interest shall be paid for by the party taking action or party contracting for work which caused the necessity for the extraordinary repair. The repair shall be such as to restore the road easement to the condition existing prior to said damage. 7. It is agreed that Developer is initially the agent to contract and oversee and do all acts necessary to accomplish the repairs and maintenance required and/or authorized under this Agreement. Developer further agrees that the agent may at any time be replaced at the direction of a majority of the lot owners. Repair and maintenance work on the private road easement shall be commenced when a majority of the lot owners agree in writing that such work is needed. The agent shall obtain three bids from licensed contractors and shall accept the lowest of said three bids and shall then initiate the work. The agent shall be paid for all costs incurred including a reasonable compensation for the agent's services, and such costs shall be added to and paid as a part of the repair and maintenance costs; provided, however, that compensation for the agent's services shall in no event exceed an amount equivalent to 10% of the actual cost of repairs and maintenance performed. In performing his duties, the agent, as he anticipates the need for funds, shall notify the parties and each party shall within forty -five (45) days pay the agent, who shall maintain a trustee account and also maintain accurate accounting records which are to be available for inspection by any party or authorized agent upon reasonable request. All such records shall be retained by the agent for a period of five years. 8. Should any lot owner fail to pay the pro rata share of costs and expenses as provided in this Agreement, then the agent or any lot owner or owners shall be entitled without further notice to institute legal action for the collection of funds advanced on behalf of such lot owner in accordance with the provisions of California Civil Code Section 845, and shall be entitled to recover in such action in addition to the funds advanced, interest thereon at the current prime rate of interest, until paid, all costs and disbursements of such action, including such sum or sums as the Court may fix as and for a reasonable attorneys fees. 9. Any liability of the lot owners for personal injury to the agent hereunder, or to any worker employed to make repairs or provide maintenance under this Agreement, or to third persons, as well as any liability of the lot owners for damage to the property of agent, or any such worker, or of any third persons, as a result of or arising out of repairs and maintenance under this Agreement, shall be bome, as between the lot owners in the same percentages as they bear the costs and expenses of such repairs and maintenance. Each lot owner shall be responsible for and maintain his own insurance, if any. By this Agreement, the Developer does not intend to provide for the sharing of liability with respect to personal injury or property damage other than that attributable to the repairs and maintenance undertaken under this Agreement. Each of the lot owners agrees to indemnify the others from any and all liability for injury to himself or damage to his property when such injury or damage results from, arises out of, or is attributable to any maintenance or repairs undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. 10. Lot owners shall jointly and severally defend and indemnify and hold harmless City, City's engineer and its consultants and each of its officials, directors, officers, agents and employees from and against all liability, claims, damages, losses, expenses, personal injury and other costs, including costs of defense and attorney's fees, to the agent hereunder or to any lot owner, any contractor, any subcontractor, any user of the road easement, or to any other third persons arising out of or in any way related to the use of, repair or maintenance of, or the failure to repair or maintain the private road easement. Nothing in the Agreement, the specifications or other contract documents or City's approval of the plans and specifications or inspection of the work is intended to include a review, inspection acknowledgement of a responsibility for any such matter, and City, City's engineer and its consultants, and each of its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents, shall have no responsibility or liability therefore. 11. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land and shall be deemed to be for the benefit of the land of each of the lot owners and each and every person who shall at anytime own all or any portion of the property referred to herein. 12. It is understood and agreed that the covenants herein contained shall be binding on the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assignees of each of the lot owners. 13. It is the purpose of the signatories hereto that this instrument be recorded to the end and intent that the obligation hereby created shall be and constitute a covenant running with the land and any subsequent purchaser of all or any portion thereof, by acceptance of delivery of a deed and/or conveyance regardless of forth, shall be deemed to have consented to and become bound by these presents, including without limitation, the right of any person entitled to enforce the terms of this Agreement to institute legal action as provided in Paragraph 8 hereof, such remedy to be cumulative and in addition to other remedies provided in this Agreement and to all other remedies at law or in equity. 14. The terms of this Agreement may be amended in writing upon majority approval of the lot owners and consent of the City. 15. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, the validity, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby. 16. If the Property constitutes a "Common Interest Development" as defined in California Civil Code Section 1351(c) which will include membership in or ownership of an "Association" as defined in California Civil Code Section 1351(a), anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, the following provisions shall apply at and during such time as (i) the Property is encumbered by a "Declaration" (as defined in California Civil Code Section 1351(h), and (ii) the Common Area of the property (including the private road easement) is managed and controlled by an Association: (a) The Association, through its Board of Directors, shall repair and maintain the private road easement and shall be deemed the "agent' as referred to in Paragraph 7 above. The Association, which shall not be replaced except by amendment to the Declaration, shall receive no compensation for performing such duties. The costs of such maintenance and repair shall be assessed against each owner and his subdivision interest in the Property pursuant to the Declaration. The assessments shall be deposited in the Associations corporate account. (b) The provisions in the Declaration which provide for assessment liens in favor of the Association and enforcement thereof shall supersede Paragraph 8 of the Agreement in its entirety. No individual owners shall have the right to alter, maintain or repair any of the Common Area (as defined in California Civil Code Section 1351(b) in the Property except as may be allowed by the Declaration. (c) This Agreement shall not be interpreted in any manner which reduces or limits the Association's rights and duties pursuant to its Bylaws and Declaration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the 16;;�7Jy day of 1YrJVe1n BE IZ 2000. fAbA k p MS tl L, Developer: L./o, e n era q SF eJo h/ :7 ZJvre „( Pries ;d(e ? Signature of DEVELOPER must be notarized. Attach t propriate acknowlea- Bement. CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT SI319 of r ,4 L 1 FTJ RN r A county of 5A N Di E C O On BYOV r g} 0 O before me, Jan; ce_ /C . 5 w e n s onr /VrnARv Prtecic , Oab Na ad Till. f, C) personally appeared JOAN.__ F. .5_iLVWLW00P Nane(ar of Sge.tal O personally known to me - OR - t�'proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/arasubscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that hetsheAhW executed the same in his/herRhek authorized capacity(iec), and that by K @ hisJhetAhair signature(c) on the instrument the person(, JANICE Commb*m 91192&77 or the entity upon behalf of whIch the person(s) acted, Noksy Public- Carlamb - executed the instrument. Sol ONpo Ca+rM hilrCurim omA gR3= WITNESS my hand and official seal - sgraaw. a Noryr Putlk O ZONAL Thwgh the nkrmabon below is rrof regtrmd by faw, it may prove vakiaWs b persons ml on sle doclanenf arrd could pr•vWX hauduleM removal and maffari rrf nd of this form to an Mw doa ment Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: i Document Date: r i • .l Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: D01-{-N O Individual R Corporate Officer Tele(s): t' /CE ; r L10V I O Partner — O Limited O General O Aflomey -in -Fact O Trustee O Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Top of lhumb here Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: O Individual O Corporate Officer Title(s): I Partner — O Limited O General Attomey -in -Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: a_ x c EXHIBIT 'A" PRIVATE POAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR TPM 98 -272 INDICATES AREA OF ROAD MAINTENAACE AGREEMENT it(858) 9-622 EAING (858) 259 -8212 535 N. HWY 101, STE. A SOLANA BEACH. CA 92075 SCALE 1' - 200' EXHIBIT "B" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. Recording Requested By: City Engineer When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 THE Urc1GINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT YAS RECORDED ON APR 03, 2001 DODJMENT NUMDER 2001- 0197428 GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COIMTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 10:41 AN SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR DRAINAGE Assessor's Parcel No. 264 - 451-05-CV Project No.: TPM 98 -272 Adam's Run L. ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as ("PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of TPM 98 -272 by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. F. Failure of OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: j( QDq Svv K Dated b U 1 L.f". �J �EnIE A� t? rvC��1Q, SF q%� -N NL ,� JofJr✓ Dated Dated Dated (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached.) CITY OF ENCINITAS c Dated Z ( by (Notarization not required) Alan D. Archibald Director of Engineering Services CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Slale of G Fo 2P_ A Canty of ✓5f)N Di EG o On _�V, a o 0 o before me, kiln;r *- L 5wensoni IV o -. r�tB�iL , _ Nr r nee d beiar (t.g..'JrM 00�, P6 a, Pu personally appeared TORN F. 51LVE-j2W120 -D Nanw(tl of SVW11) ❑ personally known to me - OR - .(droved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons} whose name(&) is/arasubscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that harsheAherexecuted the same in histhedthoir authorized capacity(ia&), and that by JM110E K SWFNSOrr his /heFkhe ignature(4on the instrument the person(s), commtWon y t 1M73 or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, s Noton, Pubk - Conforrdc executed the instrument. ! Son DleW County My Comm.BOTS Aug &2OC2 WITNESS my hand and fficial seal. Thmph the ofo maam below o nor nrquxvd by law, R may prom valuabfe to p� ri*Yq on M docvmenf and could prover# fraudulent removaf and reaffach"WO d Vus forrrr b a fhw dt ent Description of Attached Document lAo_� Title or Type of Document: &5S5 __E Document Date: /,(I)V, Z ;f.-O O D Number of Pages: S Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: t_ %�/ OP E-AC'r n i 7'A6 CAC_,+N /972 C Hi 3,4Lr) Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: 3_0/i-Al S'i Ll VC=X WQbtD ❑ Individual 6iLCorporate Officer Tme(s): Pre i l)ETft 0 Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General • Aromey -in -Fact 0 Trustee 0 Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Top or Ihu b here Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): 0 Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ Attomey -in -Fact ❑ General ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other. Signer Is Representing: RIGHT TNUr,111PRWT, CF SIGNER v....n ..................... n. o­.. ,_on e..?­ I-.... 11 o..v f e a"I. A, 1.1N, F'11 Px -v'Irr C il I I... L. B,,i1 , ' , ovi ATTACHMENT A TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY. HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR DRAINAGE PROJECT NO, TPM 98 -272 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTH-WEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTH-WEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, R-ANGE 3 NEST, SAID BERNARDENO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN'' THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDI\G TO UNITED STATES GOVERNr IEN7 SURVEY. ATTACHMENT B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR DRAINAGE PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -272 OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS 1- For claims that are alleged to have arisen, directly or indirectly, from drainage or runoff associated with the PROPERTY or the plans, design, construction or maintenance of OWNER' s improvements, OWNER unconditionally waives all present and future claims against CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees, and agents. This waiver does not apply to claims that are alleged to have arisen out of the sole, active negligence or deliberate, wrongful act of CITY. 2. It is further understood and agreed that all of OWNER'S rights under §1542 of the Civil Code of, the State of California and any similar law of any state or territory of the United States are hereby expressly waived. 9 1542 reads as follows: 1542. Certain claims not affected by general release. A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor. 3. OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of OWNER or OWNER's agents, employees, subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives. Upon demand, OWNER shall, at its own expense, defend CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all such liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs. OWNER' s obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the plans, specifications and design of the improvements, but does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of a defect in the plans, specifications or design that is a result of a change required by CITY to the OWNER's proposed plans, specifications or design so long as such change is objected to, in writing, by OWNER, and the writing is filed with the City Engineer more than ten days prior to the commencement of work. OWNER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the construction of the improvements; alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the improvements, alleged injury to persons or property; and any alleged inverse condemnation of property as a consequence of the design, construction, or maintenance of the improvements. By approving the improvement plans, specifications and design or by inspecting or approving the improvements, CITY shall not have waived the protections afforded herein to CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents or diminished the obligation of OWNER who shall remain obligated in the same degree to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless as provided above. OWNER's obligation herein does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of the CITY's intentional wrongful acts, CITY's violations of law, or CITY's sole active negligence. 4. OWNER hereby agrees not to develop in any manner the PROPERTY except as authorized by CITY's ordinances and then only in accordance with issued permits. Among other things, but without limitation, this shall prohibit the alteration of land forms, removal of vegetation and the erection of structures of any type, except as permitted or authorization by CITY. 5. This Covenant does not Preclude OWNER taking emergency, protective measures as approved by CITY. Recording Requested by City Engineer When Recorded Mail To City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT WS RECORDED ON AF'R 03, 2001 DOCUMENT ORR 2001 -0197427 M60RY J. SMITH, COI R RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 10:41 AM SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel No. _Z64-451-o5 -oo Project No.: TPM 98 -272 W. 0. No.: A. Adam's Run L.P (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TPM 98 -272 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of private improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required private improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter) , SUBDIVIDER hereby covenants and agrees for the ber, =fit of CITY, to do the following: See Exhibit B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. SUBDIVIDER agrees that SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bi I of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant E- If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys fees, from the other party. F. Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. G. Upon SUBDIVIDER's satisfactory completion of SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations contained herein, SUBDIVIDER may request and CITY shall execute a Satisfaction of Covenant. H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against SUBDIVIDER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: AV DA 5 Li, /l% DEVELOPER G6NEft9� P4A- rIvEil 5 F Dated Dated (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached.) CI Y OF ENCINITAS By r Dated ZI (1 D Alan D. Archibald Director of Engineering Services (Notarization not required) CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Slats of Ate, F0AP/ A County of � N Di_E(i b On NOV. � D00 before me, Sanic P K. Su7cnson NoTRty �KBU'C , Dal. Nance a T d Omd, I..g., -Jan. Do., IMary Wc'j personalty appeared = /j/i F� SiC V&W woOP NW,Mq d Syie.(ar 0 personally known to me – OR proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person( whose name(e) is/a;& subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heTSheAhey executed the same in hiss il;Ahe t authorized capacitypac), and that by hisA"rAheir signatures) on the instrument the person(c), JANICE K. SWENSON or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, CommWon S 1192679 executed the instrument. Notary Public - Collfomb _ San DkW County WITNESS my hand and official seal. QMyCornm.B0,wALQ&2M2 sgnn,n a Notary vwe _ O ZONAL ThmgI7 ftw ofwmawn below L no mqured by law, R may prove raAtabh b Po s RMyig an the docawnenf and coL&V prohm fraudulenl remvar and mada`hmem o/ It" form to another do nest Description of Attached Doc m Ii - • 1 /. r V // Number of ..- Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) ❑ Individual 6d'Corporate Officer roe(s): PJOES ,Qgzfr O Partner — ❑ Limited O General ❑ Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee 0 Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attomey -in -Fact O Trustee O Guardian or Conservator O Other. Signer Is Representing: FIGHT THUMEIPMT OF SIGNER 1 1 -1 ­i... • 1 _ \n 1 n+.� a,¢ I79­ . ,. a,.11 P I. r. i 11 :9114 1 o14�Si' eY.er -3,fI I I a,'HY.5 bb o ATTACHMENT A TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -272 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTFRVEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TO�%WSHEP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 NEST, SAN BERNARDI\O BASE ANT MERIDIAN', IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNVIEN7 SURVEY. ATTACHMENT B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -272 SUBDIVIDER's DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS Name of SUBDIVIDER: Svw F r+-VlcaOn Tract or Parcel Map Number TPM 98 -272 Name of subdivision: aoP vas IFu.-L Resolution of Approval Number: °l$ -2 l2 Adopted: Estimated total cost of improvements: $ 344 k aoa . 00 1.0 IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED 1.1 SUBDIVIDER agrees at SUBDIVIDER's own cost and expense to furnish all the labor, equipment and materials to perform and complete, in accordance with the plans and specifications and to the satisfaction and approval of the City Engineer, all of the private improvements referred to below: Grading plan drawing no. WL-N`f - U sheets 1 through _& dated %o /2.a / and prepared by Pasco Engineering as approved on 2 / /Z i by the City Engineer together with any subsequent amendments approved in writing by the City Engineer, on file with CITY in City Engineer's office and incorporated herein as though fully set forth at length. 1.2 Further, SUBDIVIDER agrees to perform the following conditions: All improvements, conditions and work pursuant to Conditions of Approval for TPM 98 -272 2.0 PROGRESS OF WORK 21 Time is of the essence with this Covenant. SUBDIVIDER shall commence substantial construction of the private improvements required by this Covenant no later than 3" /v , /2003 and shall complete the private improvements no later than 3 /01/04, In the event good cause exists, as determined by the City Engineer, the time for commencement of construction or completion of the private improvements hereunder may be extended. Any such extension may be granted without notice to SUBDIVIDER's Surety or Sureties, if any, and shall in no way affect the validity of this Covenant or release the Surety or Sureties on any security given f or the faithful performance of this Covenant. The City Engineer shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDER to an extension. As a condition of such extensions, the City Engineer may require SUBDIVIDER to furnish new security guaranteeing performance of this Covenant, as extended, in an increased amount as necessary to compensate for any increase in construction costs as determined by the City Engineer. 2.2 If any of the private improvements are to be constructed or installed on land not owned by SUBDIVIDER, no construction or installation shall be commenced prior to SUBDIVIDER demonstrating to CITY that SUBDIVIDER has acquired the appropriate property interests. 2.3 SUBDIVIDER shall, at SUBDIVIDER's expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction of the private improvements and give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law. 2.4 SUBDIVIDER shall notify the City Engineer in writing at least 15 days prior to the commencement of work hereunder. No construction work shall begin until authorized by CITY. 2.5 SUBDIVIDER shall not be entitled to obtain occupancy permits for the buildings constructed on any lot created by the subdivision until all required improvements have been provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2.6 SUBDIVIDER shall at all times maintain safe construction facilities, and provide safe access, for inspection CITY, to all parts of the work and to the shops wherein the work is in preparation. 2.7 SUBDIVIDER shall give good and adequate warning to the public to each and every existing danger relating to the construction of the private improvements, and shall protect the public from such dangers. 3.0 INSPECTIONIAPPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS 3.1 The City Engineer or his duly authorized representative, upon request of SUBDIVIDER, shall inspect, at SUBDIVIDER's expense the private improvements herein agreed to be constructed and installed by SUBDIVIDER. If determined to be in accordance with applicable CITY standards and the other terms of this Covenant, the City Engineer shall approve the improvements. 3.2 SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay for each inspection of the improvements required by the City Engineer. 3.3 Approval of the private improvements by CITY, shall not constitute a waiver by CITY of any defects in the improvements. 34 Until such time as the private improvements required by this Covenant are fully completed by SUBDIVIDER and approved by the City Engineer. SUBDIVIDER will be responsible for the care, maintenance, repair and replacement of such private improvements. 4.0 HOLD HARMLESS 4.1 SUBDIVIDER agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees, and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities. claims, demands. causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of SUBDIVIDER or SUBDIVIDER's agents, employees, subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives. Upon demand. SUBDIVIDER shall, at its own expense, defend CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all such liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs. 4.2 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the plans, specifications and design of the private improvements; but does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of a defect in the plans, specifications or design that is a result of a change required by CITY to SUBDIVIDER's proposed plans, specifications or design so long as such change is objected to, in writing, by SUBDIVIDER, and the writing is filed with the City Engineer more than ten days prior to the commencement of work. 4.3 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the construction of the private improvements; alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the private improvements; alleged injury to persons or property; alleged inverse condemnation of property or a consequence of the design, construction, or maintenance of the work or the private improvements; and any accident, loss or damage to the work or the private improvements prior to the approval of the construction of the private improvements by CITY. 4.4 By approving the improvement plans, specifications and design or by inspecting or approving the private improvements, CITY shall not have waived the protections afforded herein to CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents or diminished the obligation of SUBDIVIDER who shall remain obligated in the same degree to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless as provided above. 4.5 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action. losses, damages or costs that arise out of CITY's intentional wrongful acts, CITY's violations of law. or CITY's sole active negligence. 5.0 INSURANCE 5.1 SUBDIVIDER shall obtain and maintain a policy of motor vehicle liability, public liability, general liability and property damage insurance from an insurance company approved by CITY and authorized to do business in the State of California, in an insurable amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence. The insurance policy shall provide that the policy shall remain in force during the life of this COVENANT and shall not be cancelled, terminated, or allowed to expire without thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY from the insurance company. 5.2 CITY shall be named as an additional insured on SUBDIVIDER's policies. 5.3 SUBDIVIDER shall furnish certificates of said insurance to CITY prior to commencement of work under this AGREEMENT. 6.0 REPAIR MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT As a condition on the approval by CITY of the satisfactory construction of the private improvements, SUBDIVIDER shall prepare, have executed. and record a covenant, in a form satisfactory to CITY, whereby property owners who will be served by the private improvements will be obligated to provide for the repair, maintenance and replacement of the private improvements and to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless. 7.0 NOTICES 7.1 Any notices to be given under this COVENANT, or otherwise, shall be served by certified mail. 7.2 For the purposes hereof, unless otherwise provided in writing by the parties hereto, the address of CITY and the proper person to receive any such notice on its behalf is: City Engineer City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 and the address of SUBDIVIDER and the proper person to receive any such notice on its behalf is: P.O. Box 270649 San Diego, CA. 92198 -0649 John F. Silverwood President, RSF BEN, Inc. 8.0 SUBDIVIDER's CERTIFICATION OF AWARENESS OF IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT OF 1986 SUBDIVIDER certifies that SUBDIVIDER is aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (8 USC SS 1101 -1525) and will comply with these requirements, including but not limited to verifying the eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors and consultants that are included in, satisfy the duties and obligations contained herein. 9.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 9.1 Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of SUBDIVIDER's agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of CITY in connection with the performance of SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations under this Covenant. 9.2 Sale or other disposition of the PROPERTY will not relieve SUBDIVIDER from the duties and obligations set forth herein. 9.3 SUBDIVIDER shall provide the improvements as an independent contractor and in pursuit of SUBDIVIDER's independent calling, and not as an employee of CITY. SUBDIVIDER shall not be under control of CITY except as to the result to be accomplished. SUBDIVIDER may confer with CITY as required to perform this Covenant. 9.4 No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, official, agent or employee of CITY, either before, during or after the execution of this Covenant, shall effect or modify any of the terms or obligations herein contained. APW SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER DOC P'S 2001 - 0197426 TO 2001-0197431 APR 03, 2001 10:41 AM RECORDING: 61.00 ADD'L RECORDING: 41.00 MICROGRAPHICS: 5.00 TRIAL COURT: 36.00 COW. COPY: 5.00 TOTAL DUE: 148.00 TOTAL TENDERED: 170.00 --- -- -- - - - - -- OV: 22.00 Recording Requested by: City Engineer When Recorded Mail To City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT WAS RECORDED ON AM 03, 2001 DOCUMENT NUMBER 2001-0197425 GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 10:41 AM SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel No. Z64 -g5/ -05 - 00 Project No.: TPM 98 -272 W.O. No.: A. Adam's Run L.P. (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TPM 98 -272 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of public improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required public improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter) , SUBDIVIDER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Exhibit B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. SUBDIVIDER agrees that SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due f financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys fees, from the other party. F. Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the fling by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. & Upon SUBDIVIDER's satisfactory completion of SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations contained herein, SUBDIVIDER may request and CITY shall execute a Satisfaction of Covenant. H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against SUBDIVIDER. ACCEPTED AND AGRE�ED-D- U g6ArrlS pm/ Dated /I" (f— 0 d Dated Dated Dated D VELOPER } ,o y� .P. GcnV --ql Partr.vER, �SFi3ErtlsNC. �JaN.v F S I veewoel (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached.) TAS OF INI :Iw By: Mya6 Dated Z Alan D. Archibald Director of Engineering Services (Notarization not required) CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT S'a'a of i} L! F D 12ly i fi County of � N Dr ECG D On NOV. f'_ �,DD o before me, .Torn ice k Swen, son /Ya7/t12v f�9raC Nam. ad Tft a Dina, leq .'b Doa, Nwry vu personally appeared 701+N LVEIZWODIC Name(a) d Sgr,(a) U personally known to me – OR – ,droved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(&) whose name(s) is/aw subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/cheAhey executed the same in his4w4l4eir authorized capacity(ie&), and that by JAh110E K SMlEK50►'r his/hP40;eir•signature(Q on the instrument the person(, Corn Won ttt+76� or the entity upon behalf of which the persons) acted, Notory 1pijolic - CpAfaRiC executed the instrument. Son D4690 Co ,,ty mV C•omm.6xPiM5 &Q& 2= WITNESS my hand and official seal. . ,. a Navvy Polec - - O TIONAL Though Uw n/orma&cn below is not required bylaw, if may prove valuable to persons n*,*V on ale doGwnNlr and mind pm"W fraudulent removal and martachmenf of Otis romi io another do wIl. Description of Attached Document s. Ii��► �u���. �. �7►' r.•'tl�[iSi!v!r;�. Oak Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) i Signer's Name: aD f SiLVeleLwcw O Individual Corporate It Tllle(s): X Ze 1 OEaj_ ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Attomey -in -Fact Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER 01994 Nalmnal NalaNASsou.1,- 87369,,nlAve, PC Bu. 7104- Canopa PaA. CA 911 097184 Prod No 5907 Heo,der Call for r.al tluva,o —, ATTACHMENT A TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -272 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTH- %%TST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 NEST, SAN BERNARDrNO BASE ARID NIERIDI!A-N. IN THE COUI'.TY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORINIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. ATTACHMENT B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -272 SUBDIVIDER's DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS Name of SUBDIVIDER: S1w049wa+o Tract or Parcel Map Number TPM 98 -272 Name of subdivision: o oo.w.s %2 ." Resolution of Approval Number: IJCD - 99- /0?Adopted: DL- 6CMl3C.Y to, 1999 Estimated total cost of improvements: # .44 45,- ,00b •CMG 1.0 IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED 1.1 SUBDIVIDER agrees at SUBDIVIDER's own cost and expense to furnish all the labor, equipment and materials to perform and complete, in accordance with the plans and specifications and to the satisfaction and approval of the City Engineer, all of the public improvements referred to below' GS -, Improvement plan drawing no.G sheets 1 through 9 dated Lo /2s+ /co and prepared by Pasco Engineering—, as approved on 2. / C,/ p by the City Engineer together with any subsequent amendments approved in writing by the City Engineer on file with CITY in City Engineer's office and incorporated herein as though fully set forth at length. 1.2 Further, SUBDIVIDER agrees to perform the following conditions: Public Improvements pursuant to TPM 98 -272 2.0 PROGRESS OF WORK 2.1 Time is of the essence with this Covenant. SUBDIVIDER shall commence substantial construction of the public improvements required by this Covenant no later than 5/0 % / zoo ,3 and shall complete the public improvements no later than 3/ + / 20c�{ In the event good cause exists, as determined by the City Engineer, the time for commencement of construction or completion of the public improvements hereunder may be extended. Any such extension may be granted without notice to SUBDIVIDER's Surety or Sureties, if any, and shall in no way affect the validity of this Covenant or release the Surety or Sureties on any security given f or the faithful performance of this Covenant. The City Engineer shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDER to an extension. As a condition of such extensions, the City Engineer may require SUBDIVIDER to furnish new security guaranteeing performance of this Covenant, as extended, in an increased amount as necessary to compensate for any increase in construction costs as determined by the City Engineer. 2.2 If any of the public improvements are to be constructed or installed on land not owned by SUBDIVIDER, no construction or installation shall be commenced prior to SUBDIVIDER demonstrating to CITY that SUBDIVIDER has acquired the appropriate property interests. 2.3 SUBDIVIDER shall, at SUBDIVIDER's expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction of the public improvements and give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law. 2.4 SUBDIVIDER shall notify the City Engineer in writing at least 15 days prior to the commencement of work hereunder. No construction work shall begin until authorized by CITY. 2.5 SUBDIVIDER shall not be entitled to obtain occupancy permits for the buildings constructed on any lot created by the subdivision until all required improvements have been provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2.6 SUBDIVIDER shall at all times maintain safe construction facilities, and provide safe access, for inspection CITY, to all parts of the work and to the shops wherein the work is in preparation. 2.7 SUBDIVIDER shall give good and adequate warning to the public to each and every existing danger relating to the construction of the public improvements, and shall protect the public from such dangers. 3.0 INSPECTION /APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS 3.1 The City Engineer or his duly authorized representative, upon request of SUBDIVIDER, shall inspect, at SUBDIVIDER's expense the public improvements herein agreed to be constructed and installed by SUBDIVIDER. If determined to be in accordance with applicable CITY standards and the other terms of this Covenant, the City Engineer shall approve the improvements. 3.2 SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay for each inspection of the improvements required by the City Engineer. 3.3 Approval of the public improvements by CITY, shall not constitute a waiver by CITY of any defects in the improvements. 3.4 Until such time as the public improvements required by this Covenant are fully completed by SUBDIVIDER and approved by the City Engineer. SUBDIVIDER will be responsible for the care, maintenance, repair and replacement of such public improvements. 4.0 HOLD HARMLESS 4.1 SUBDIVIDER agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees, and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands. causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of SUBDIVIDER or SUBDIVIDER's agents, employees, subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives. Upon demand, SUBDIVIDER shall, at its own expense, defend CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all such liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs. 4.2 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the plans, specifications and design of the public improvements; but does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of a defect in the plans, specifications or design that is a result of a change required by CITY to SUBDIVIDER's proposed plans, specifications or design so long as such change is objected to, in writing, by SUBDIVIDER, and the writing is filed with the City Engineer more than ten days prior to the commencement of work. 4.3 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the construction of the public improvements; alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the public improvements; alleged injury to persons or property, alleged inverse condemnation of property or a consequence of the design, construction, or maintenance of the work or the public improvements; and any accident, loss or damage to the work or the public improvements prior to the approval of the construction of the public improvements by CITY. 4.4 By approving the improvement plans, specifications and design or by inspecting or approving the public improvements, CITY shall not have waived the protections afforded herein to CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents or diminished the obligation of SUBDIVIDER who shall remain obligated in the same degree to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless as provided above. 4.5 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action. losses, damages or costs that arise out of CITY's intentional wrongful acts, CITY's violations of law. or CITY's sole active negligence. 5.0 INSURANCE 5.1 SUBDIVIDER shall obtain and maintain a policy of motor vehicle liability, public liability, general liability and property damage insurance from an insurance company approved by CITY and authorized to do business in the State of California, in an insurable amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence. The insurance policy shall provide that the policy shall remain in force during the life of this COVENANT and shall not be cancelled, terminated, or allowed to expire without thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY from the insurance company. 5.2 CITY shall be named as an additional insured on SUBDIVIDER's policies. 5.3 SUBDIVIDER shall furnish certificates of said insurance to CITY prior to commencement of work under this AGREEMENT. 6.0 REPAIR MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT As a condition on the approval by CITY of the satisfactory construction of the public improvements, SUBDIVIDER shall prepare, have executed. and record a covenant, in a form satisfactory to CITY, whereby property owners who will be served by the public improvements will be obligated to provide for the repair, maintenance and replacement of the public improvements and to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless. 7.0 NOTICES 7.1 Any notices to be given under this COVENANT, or otherwise, shall be served by certified mail. 7.2 For the purposes hereof, unless otherwise provided in writing by the parties hereto, the address of CITY and the proper person to receive any such notice on its behalf is City Engineer City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas. CA 92024 and the address of SUBDIVIDER and the proper person to receive any such notice on its behalf is: P.O. Box 270649 San Diego, California 92198 -0649 John F. Silverwood President, RSF BEN, Inc, 8.0 SUBDIVIDER's CERTIFICATION OF AWARENESS OF IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT OF 1986 SUBDIVIDER certifies that SUBDIVIDER is aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (8 USC SS 1101 -1525) and will comply with these requirements, including but not limited to verifying the eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors and consultants that are included in, satisfy the duties and obligations contained herein. 9.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 9.1 Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of SUBDIVIDER's agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of CITY in connection with the performance of SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations under this Covenant. 9.2 Sale or other disposition of the PROPERTY will not relieve SUBDIVIDER from the duties and obligations set forth herein. 9.3 SUBDIVIDER shall provide the improvements as an independent contractor and in pursuit of SUBDIVIDER's independent calling, and not as an employee of CITY. SUBDIVIDER shall not be under control of CITY except as to the result to be accomplished. SUBDIVIDER may conferwith CITY as required to perform this Covenant. 9.4 No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, official, agent or employee of CITY, either before, during or after the execution of this Covenant, shall effect or modify any of the terms or obligations herein contained. RECORDING REQU1 .0 BY AND, WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 DOC # 001- 0210690 APR 06. 2001 4:10 PM OFFICIAL RECORDS SAH DIEGO CUM RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, COI FY RECORDER FEES: 20.00 �[ m ENCROACHMENT MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL COVENANT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. �oZ�7ZP� A.P.N.G��� rvM f As encroachment permit is hereby granted to the Permittee designated in paragraph one, Attachment "A," as the owner of the Benefitted Property described in paragraph two, Attachment "A," to encroach upon City Property described in paragraph three, Attachment "A," as detailed in the diagram, Attachment "B." Attachments "A" and "B" are hereby incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth at length. In consideration of the issuance of this encroachment permit, Permittee hereby covenants and agrees, for the benefit of the City, as follows: 1. This covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumberancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees, and assigns of the respective parties. 2. Permittee shall use and occupy the City Property only in the manner and for the purposes described in paragraph four, Attachment "A." 3. By accepting the benefits herein, Permittee acknowledges title to the City Property to be in the City and waives all right to contest that title. 4. The term of the encroachment permit is indefinite and may be revoked by the City and abandoned by.Permittee at any time. The City shall mail written notice of ,revocation to Permittee, addressed to the Benefitted Property which shall set forth the date upon which the benefits of encroachment permit are to cease. 5. City is entitled to remove all or a portion of the improvements constructed by Permittee in order to repair, replace, or install public improvements. City shall have no obligation to pay for or restore Permittee's improvements. 6. Permittee agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against all claims, demands, costs, losses, damages, injuries, litigation, and liability arising out of or related to the use, construction, encroachment or maintenance to be done by the Permittee or Permittee's agents, employees or contractors on City Property. TF /04 /PW4- 206wp5.bk (1- 04 -96) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN JOHN SILVERWOOD AND CITY OF ENCINITAS TPM 98 -272, Record of Discussion on February 25, 2001 On February 25, 2001, John Silverwood, a private developer (hereinafter "Developer'), and Wayne Pasco, a design and engineering consultant, met with City representatives, Alan D. Archibald, Masih Maher and Jennifer Smith to discuss issues pertaining to the proposed sewer plans associated with Tentative Parcel Map 98 -272. The approved Tentative Parcel map 98 -272 proposes to subdivide a vacant legal lot into four lots for property located along Fortuna Ranch Road within the Rural Residential (RR) Zone. The easterly half of the property is located within the Colton -Bosch Sewer Reimbursement Agreement area. The westerly half of the property is located within the Bukamier Sewer Reimbursement Agreement area. The plan, as approved by the City, shows construction of a sewer main from Fortuna Ranch Road to approximately 550' north of Fortuna Ranch Road. According to the plans, Parcels 1,2, and 3 are to connect, via private sewer lateral, to the new sewer main and Parcel 4 is to connect directly to the sewer main built by Colton - Bosch. To meet the contractual obligations of the Colton -Bosch Sewer Reimbursement Agreement and the Bukamier Sewer Reimbursement Agreement, the Developer has agreed to record the map as approved by City staff and will process a construction change to convert the sewer main to four private sewer laterals. Under the construction change, Parcels 1 and 2 will connect directly, via private sewer lateral, to the Bukamier sewer main and Parcels 3 and 4 will connect directly, via private sewer lateral, to the Colton -Bosch Sewer. The applicant will be required to pay the calculated reimbursement fees based on two (2) equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) connections under the Colton Bosch Sewer Reimbursement Agreement and (2) EDU connections under the Bukamier Reimbursement Agreement. These fees and the wastewater discharge permit fees are due on or before March 19, 2001. Maintenance of the private sewer laterals shall be the responsibility of the property owner(s) and this requirement shall be disclosed to potential property owner(s) prior to sale. If the Developer pays the required traffic mitigation fees on or before 4:00 p.m., March 19, 2001, he will be assessed at a rate of $1,081 per legal lot. If the Developer pays the required traffic mitigation fees after March 19, 2001, he will be assessed at a rate of $2,670 per legal lot. As part of the this Memorandum of Understanding, the City confirms that the applicant must relocate, but is not required to place underground, the existing utilities located on the utility poles in the public right -of -way as shown on TPM 98 -272. Unless otherwise revised, in writing, and agreed upon by both parties, this document shall serve as the official Memorandum of Understanding between John Silverwood and the City of Encinitas. Alan D. Archibald John Silverwood Engineering Services Director City of Encinitas Date Date BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT 8586132999 06/15 '00 13:31 NO.904 01/05 BENA -MEL DEVELOPMENT, INC. P.Q. Box 270649 San Diego, CA 92198-0649 Phone: 858- 613 -2990 Fax: 858- 613 -2999 Fax \k' )w From: V CI L, 1.1 (L r.) eo Phone: Pages: /�� J Fax: Date: lY F57^ (:5 C) ❑ Urgent For R.,,11,1 E) Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle •Comments* kY4 F G W/ P�^l �y� OPENING OPPORTUNITIES. BUILDING A FUTURE 3. v f4CflLs or- (VAW10 ,QQUi57row Tech -Bilt, Inc. Mailing Address 3575 Kenyon St. P.O. Box 80036 San Diego, CA 92110 San Diego, CA 92138 Telapbone (619j 223 -1663 FAX (619) 223 -2865 I May 17, 2000 Mr. COSMO Come Cardiff Properties 4148 Voltaire St. San Diegol CA 2107 RE: !vlRa u"' sterAvemie ConservatfF n Bank Dam: l r. ntez Th ttk y' very much for your purchase -of -conservation credits from the Manchester AveStie Conservation Bank. Enclosed for your records is are signed Conservation Credit Purchase Agreement and Acknowledgement of Sale of Conservation Credits your purchase of 3>0 m4ltlstecie9 conservation cre4ts from the Manchester Avenue Conservation Bank. We appreo {ate your business very much: If YOU have any questions, please contact me, Sincerely, Tech -Bilt, Inc. Ted Tchang, Vice President Tr:TT 1 Enclosores; i 1 i i N BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT 8586132999 06/15 '00 13:32 NO.904 04/05 j i C9N0WLLDGMENT OF SALE OF CONSERVATION CREDITS The ' n6r4gn4Seller hereby acknowledges that it has sold and conveyed Cosmo Conte, dba Caidid Pr �eg ("Puwhase three point zero (3.0) Conservation Credits from the Manchester Avatiu� C*Servatlon B" for the biological mitigation of muldsoecies impacts in connection with pr+ject known ai Adam's Ran. All.terms of thisconveyance shall be governed by the provision otthe Conservation Credit Purchase Agreement and Acknowledgment between Purc4"er and the undersigned dated May 17, 2000. SELLER: Sy: Tecl tBilt, Inc. Ted Tch"S, Vice Presided Date .f I ,_ i BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT 8586132999 06/15 '00 13:33 NO.904 05/05 u'0 7 2 100 2 786i' 1; iti000ea01.413o6 Au, w�— I CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 505 So. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 (619) 633 -2710 NOTICE OF DECISION DCD -99 -108 December 10, 1999 V This letter is to inform you that the Director of Community Development has approved your application for: 98 -272 TPM (Benamel/Silverwood) - Tentative Parcel Map for a four -lot subdivision for property located along Fortuna Ranch Road (APN 264 - 451 -05). Project Description and Discussion: The applicant proposes to subdivide a vacant legal lot into four lots for property located along Fortuna Ranch Road within the Rural Residential (RR) Zone. The RR Zone specifies a minimum net lot area of two acres. The proposed parcels meet the lot area, lot dimensions and density standards; with parcel one having a net lot area of 2.00 acres, parcel two having a net lot area of 2.44 acres, parcel three having a net lot area of 2.21 acres, and parcel four having a net lot area of 2.31 acres. All parcels exceed the width and depth standards of 110 feet and 150 feet. The applicant has submitted service availability letters indicating that all required services are available for the project site. The project contains sensitive biological resources on -site (Coastal Sage Scrub). An Environmental Initial Assessment (EIA) has been prepared by Mooney and Associates that assesses potential environmental impacts associated with the project. A protocol -level biological survey has also been conducted on -site by Mooney and Associates for the California Gnatcatcher. Impacts to coastal sage scrub total 3.0 acres. However, the Mooney and Associates protocol -level survey did not find that the California gnatcatcherused the CSS habitat and that the habitat resource was found to be of limited area, of marginal (disturbed),quality, and did not contribute to any habitat corridors to other larger areas of CSS. Since the listing of the gnatcatcher as "threatened" on March 25, 1993 under the Endangered Species Act, any impacts to CSS habitat require mitigation. It has been determined by the resource agencies (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish & Game; see letter CD(G)1?Vod1No6cd8c198272TPM. NOD(i2- 10-99) 1 dated July 19, 1999) that a 1:1 ratio to mitigate for the impact is appropriate and that the mitigation credits may be purchased in the Manchester Land Conservation Bank. Since the impact to CSS habitat is more than one acre, the City is required to report the "take" to SANDAG to be deducted from the 5% habitat loss allowance. Roughly 2.8 acres of CSS will be preserved on -site. A standard 300 -foot public notification was issued by the Community Development Department. Staff has received one letter regarding the project from an adjacent property owner, Ms. Lillie Bosch. The letter requests that an existing reimbursement agreement for the sewer line extending down Fortuna Ranch Road be amended to stipulate that all four of the proposed parcels be included (currently the agreement stipulates that only three residences reimburse for the cost of the sewer line). The letter also requests that the City grant road access through the subject subdivision for two residences located to the northeast of the land division commonly known as the "Buckmier Development." In response to the letter, the proposed subdivision would be bound as stipulated in the document entitled, "Reimbursement Agreement (Sewer Construction by Property Owner) Raymond and Lilly Bosch and Mike and Kathie Colton" dated and signed by the Cardiff Sanitation District on January 26, 1996. Further, because the on -site road proposed to serve the subdivision is a private road, any potential access rights given for the `Buckmier Development" is a private issue to be resolved by the individual, private property owners. FINDINGS Tentative Parcel Map This approval is subject to the following findings for Tentative Parcel Map. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451 of the Subdivision Map Act. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and any specific plans since the project is in conformance with the General Plan designation (Residential .26 -.5 du/ac) for the site. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the intended residential type of development, in that proposed lots will adequately accommodate existing and future single family dwellings in terms of lot size, shape, setbacks and access. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development since the topography and design of the new proposed lots can adequately accommodate existing and CD(G)I Nod /7Voticdecl98272TPM. NOD(12 -10-99) 2 future single family homes and because the subdivision conforms to the density limitations (.5 dwelling units per acre) contained within the RR Zone. 5. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the site has been found to not contain the "threatened" California Gnatcatcher and because the habitat resource was found to be of limited area, of marginal (disturbed) quality, and did not contribute to any habitat corridors to other larger areas of CSS. A mitigated Negative Declaration has been adopted for this project. Mitigation measures include the preservation, or off -site acquisition of habitat, to mitigate the "take" of approximately 3.0 acres of Coastal sage scrub (CSS) on the property. 6. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, since documentation has been obtained stating that necessary utilities and services are available for the project site. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. 8. The subdivision conforms with all the provisions of the Municipal Code including project density, lot size and lot dimensions, as per the information submitted in the subdivision application. Findings for a Special Rule 4(d) Permit In accordance with the City's adopted 4(d) Development Review Process and the December 30, 1993 Joint Letter from the California Department of Fish & Game (CDF &G) and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USF &WS), the following findings are needed to be made by the Authorized Agency: The proposed habitat loss is consistent with the interim loss criteria in the November 1993 State NCCP Conservation Guidelines and with the Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MRCP) process since: (a) The disturbed Coastal sage scrub habitat loss of 3.0 acres associated with this project does not cumulatively exceed the 5% "take" guideline since the City has an area of 1,103.1 acres of Coastal sage scrub within its corporate boundary (including the 49.1 acres of protected Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub added by the annexation of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan area). Accordingly, the "5% Interim Take Limitation" is 55.1 CD(G)/Nod/NoticdeCi98272TPM. NOD(12- 10-99) 3 acres. To date, the City has only permitted a take of 20.2 acres of Coastal sage scrub. Since the impact to CSS habitat is more than one acre, the City is required to report the "take" to SANDAG to be deducted from our 5% habitat loss allowance in accordance with the February 2, 1995 "Specific Exemptions Letter" issued by the resource agencies. (b) The habitat loss will not preclude connectivity between areas of high habitat values since it has been determined that the subject property does not lie in a corridor area which connects areas currently preserved as open space habitat resource areas. In addition, land to the west, southwest, and east of the subject property is developed with single family residences. (c) The habitat loss will not preclude or prevent the preparation of the subregional NCCP since the habitat loss is minimal. Impacts to the sensitive habitat will occur due to future grading and development of the single family residential structures within the approved subdivision. (d) The habitat loss has been minimized and mitigated to the maximum extent practicable in accordance with established mitigation procedures which require the off -site acquisition of a like amount of CSS habitat within the Manchester Avenue Land Conservation Bank. 2. The 3.0 acre loss of CSS will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery of the California gnatcatcher since the mitigation requirement preserves a like amount of habitat area. 3. The habitat loss is incidental to otherwise lawful activities since the project is required to receive all permits and clearances from local, state and federal governmental agencies and appropriate utility and service districts. The property is zoned for single family residential development and all requirements of the Tentative Subdivision Map will be implemented or secured prior to Final Map recordation. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This approval is based upon the adoption of a mitigated Negative Declaration related to environmental impacts as discussed in the Environmental Initial Assessment (EIA) prepared by Mooney and Associates. Mitigation measures include a seasonal limits for grading activities and the preservation of approximately 2.8 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS) on -site and the off -site acquisition of habitat, to mitigate at a 1:1 ratio the "take" of approximately 3.0 acres of Coastal sage scrub (CSS) on the property. CD(G)17Vod/7Voticderv98272TPM. NOD(12- 10 -99) 4 SCI C�v SC2 CONDITIONS This approval is subject to the following conditions: SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: This approval will expire on December 10, 2002 at :00 p ; two years er the approval of this project, unless the conditions-have met or an exten ' o time has been approved pursuant to the Municipal Code. SC5 This project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application and project plans dated received by the City on September 20, 1999, consisting of one sheet entitled "Tentative Parcel Map" prepared by Pasco Engineering. This map shall not be altered without express authorization by the Community Development Department. SCA With the recordation of the Final Map, the proposed open space easement called out on the Tentative Map shall be granted to the City of Encinitas and shall be deed restricted to preclude any future development or grading of the slopes. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, signage and fencing shall be erected along the open space easement line closest to the developable portion of the parcels, and along the recreational trail easement to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department to delineate the open space easements and to separate them from the developable areas on the properties and the recreational trail. SCB The City Engineer shall ensure that the private biological open space preserve areas shall be offered to the City of Encinitas through an Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate (IOD) on the Final Map to allow the City to accept the open space and transfer maintenance to a responsible agency under the Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP). Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the open space areas shall be flagged as "no build areas" to adequately designate their boundaries. The City Engineer shall inspect the site during grading to ensure that the biological open space preserves match the areas delineated on the Final Map. SCC Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the property owner shall submit a landscape plan for review and approval by the Community Development Department for all proposed graded slopes. All new slopes shall be planted with drought - tolerant native or non - evasive exotic (non- native) plantings in accordance with the "Fuel Modification Plant List" contained within the Wildland/Urban Interface Development Standards developed by the San Diego County Fire Chief's Association. This condition is intended to address fire CD(G)ANod1Nobcdec1V 8272TPM. NOD(12- 10-99) 5 suppression buffer area provisions while utilizing more natural landscape materials that are compatible with the adjacent open space areas designated for conservation. SCD With the recordation of the Final Map, 12- foot -wide public recreational trail easements as indicated on the Tentative Map shall be granted to the City of Encinitas. Said trail easements shall be improved with an 8 -foot improved trail tread and other improvements (i.e. signage, waterbars, etc.) consistent with the City's Interim Trail Standards. The trails and improvements shall include a "heavy brushed broom" concrete trail crossing at Fortuna Ranch Road and the proposed access road within the subdivision. SCE Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the Final Parcel Map, the subdivider shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the Tentative Parcel Map and the following improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: (1) Private roads and (2) Public utilities. Private access and utility easements shall be reserved on the Final Parcel Map for offsite parcels. SCF "NO Parking" signs shall be required on both sides of the street planned within the subdivision. Said signs shall be staggered down the street at 100 -foot intervals (or 200 feet apart on the same side). The fire turnaround shall be shown as a public easement and posted "No Parking — Fire Lane." All proposed structures shall be constructed with class "A" roofing materials. SCG This project is subject to the conditions, requirements, and/or limitations specified in the Water Availability Letter dated November 6, 1998 to from the Olivenhain Municipal Water District. SCH This project is subject to the mitigation measures as specified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared by Mooney and Associates and dated August 30, 1999 to minimize and mitigate the amount of habitat loss in accordance with Section 4.3 of the N.C.C.P Process Guidelines. The applicant shall acquire and preserve 3.0 acres of Coastal sage scrub (CSS) off -site within a conservation bank approved by the City of Encinitas, California Department of Fish and Game, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The applicant shall also preserve roughly 2.8 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS) located on -site through an open space easement. Further, no brushing or grading of coastal sage scrub or immediate adjacent habitat hall occur during the breeding season of the California Gnatcatcher unless otherwise permitted as specified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. CD(G)11V0dModcdeG98272TPM. NOD(12- 10 -99) G1 STANDARD CONDITIONS- CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G2 This approval may be appealed to the City Council within 10 calendar days from the date of this approval in accordance with Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code. M4 The property owner /developer shall obtain design review permits through the ' City for homes to be constructed on the lots resulting from the approved map, as well as all related site improvements. If the property owner /developer elects to develop the lots resulting from the approved final map as custom homesites, the design review permit requirement may be waived by the Community Development Department pursuant to Section 23.08.030 (7) of the Municipal Code. The property owner /developer is advised to contact the Community Development Department at such time as development of the subject property is planned to determine whether a design review permit will be required. A standard covenant specifying this condition shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder to give constructive notice to future purchasers of the site. E1 ENGINEERING CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SP 1. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map, the Subdivider shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative map and the following improvements to City Standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: • Offsite Fortuna Ranch Road to be improved to 24 feet paved width with asphalt berms in a 40 -foot graded width, from the existing end of pavement located approx. 650 feet west of the proposed subdivision to project frontage. • Frontage Fortuna Ranch Road and onsite Fortuna Ranch Road to be improved to 24 feet paved width improvements pursuant to local rural private road standards within a 40- foot -wide private road easement. An eight- foot -wide recreational trail tread shall be improved within the private road easement and a 12- foot -wide public recreational trail easement shall be granted to the City of Encinitas • Public Sewer Main onsite within a 20 -foot easement. CD(G)1Nod17Voticdec198272TPM. NOD(12- 10 -99) 7 E2 All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of building/grading permit issuance shall apply. (EC 2 No grading permits shall be issued for his subdivision prior to the recordation of the Final Map, EG3 The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. EG4 The grading for this project is defined in Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to the Engineering Services Director and verify compliance with Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. EG5 No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. EG6 A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate grading permit issued for the borrow or disposal site if located within the city limits. EG7 All newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1. EG8 A soils /geological/hydraulicreport (as applicable) shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Such report shall be submitted and approved prior to final map approval. EG9 Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the Engineering Services Director for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the Engineering Services Director may impose with regards to the hauling operation. EG10 In accordance with Section 23.24.370 (A) of the Municipal Code, no grading permit shall be issued for work occurring between October Ist of any year and April 15th of the following year, unless the plans for such work include details of protective measures, including desilting basins or other temporary drainage or control measures, or both, as may be deemed necessary by the field inspector to protect the adjoining public and private property from damage by erosion, flooding, or the deposition of mud or debris which may originate from the site or result from such grading operations. CD (G)ANodMoticdecl98272TPM. NOD(12- 10 -99) ED1 Drainage Conditions ED3 A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water originating within the subdivision, and all surface waters that may flow onto the subdivision from adjacent lands, shall be required. Said drainage system shall include any easements and structures as required by the Engineering Services Director to properly handle the drainage. ED5 The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the final map for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan and City of Encinitas Standards as required by the Engineering Services Director. ED6 The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless covenant regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map for this project. ED8 The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from a 100 -year frequency storm under developed conditions is equal to or less than the runoff from a storm of the same frequency and duration under existing conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results. ES1 Street Conditions ES2 A registered Civil Engineer or a licensed land surveyor shall provide a signed statement that: "The existing private roads of access to the project are within the easements for the benefit of the land division ". ES3 The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the Tentative Map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the Final Map for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. ES4 Reciprocal access and/or maintenance agreements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives or parking areas and maintenance thereof to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director. CD(G)/No&Noticdec✓98272TPM. NOD(12- 10-99) Pi I EU1 ES5 Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, a right -of -way construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Director and appropriate fees paid, in addition to any other permits required. ES8 The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the Engineering Services Director prior to approval of the Final Map for this project. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Encinitas Standards based on R -value tests. The standard improvement plan check deposit is required. ES9 Some improvements shown on the Tentative Map and/or required by these conditions are -- located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The subdivider shall conform to Municipal Code Section 24.16.070 regarding offsite improvements and acquisition of property interest. Utilities EU2 The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective utility agencies regarding services to the project. EU3 The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G. & E., Pacific Telephone, and other applicable authorities. EU4 All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including existing utilities unless exempt by the Municipal Code. EU7 The design of the division of land shall provide each cable operator an opportunity to construct, install and maintain, on land identified on the map as dedicated to public utility use, any equipment necessary to extend cable television services to each residential parcel in the subdivision. This conditions shall not apply to the conversion of existing dwelling units to condominiums, community apartments, or stock cooperatives. EU8 Subject to all applicable Federal and State laws, statutes and regulations, in the event of multiple cable communication operators desiring to serve new residential developments in which the electric power and telephone utilities are underground, the following procedure shall apply with respect to access to and utilization of underground easements: (a) The developer shall be responsible for contacting and surveying all franchised cable operators to ascertain which operators desire to provide cable television service to the development. The developer may establish a CD(G)17Vod/Noticdecl98272TPM. NOD(12- 10 -99) 10 EMI Mao F1 reasonable deadline to receive responses from cable operators. The final tract map shall indicate the cable operator(s) that have agreed to serve the development. (b) If one or more cable operators wish to provide service, they shall be accommodated in the joint utilities trench on a nondiscriminatory shared basis. (c) The developer shall provide at least (10) working days notice of the date that the utility trenches will be open to the cable operators that have agreed to serve the development. (d) Sharing the joint utilities trench shall be subject to compliance with Public Utilities Commission and utility standards. If such compliance is not possible, or if three (3) or more operators desire to provide service to the development, the developer shall provide a separate trench for the cable television cables, with the entire cost shared among the participating cable operators. With the concurrence of the developer, the affected utilities and the cable television operators, alternative installation procedures, such as the use of deeper trenches, may be utilized, subject to the applicable law. (e) Any cable operator wishing to serve an area where the trenches have been closed shall be responsible for separate trenching and associated costs; provided that if the cable operator was not provided timely written notice of the availability of such trenches, the developer shall reimburse the operator for such costs. EM3 This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) phase. CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F2 ACCESS ROADWAY DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roadways shall have an unobstructed paved width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. EXCEPTION: Access to one (1) single family residence shall not be less than 16 feet of paved width. CD(G)/No&lVoticdeG98272TPM. NOD(12- 10-99) 11 F4 TURNAROUNDS: All dead -end fire access roadways in excess of 150 feet in length or serving four (4) or more dwelling units shall be provided with a cul -de -sac. The cul -de- sac radius for public streets shall comply with city road standards. Streets constructed to private road standards where a turnaround is required shall have a cul -de -sac with a paved radius of not less than 36 feet. Cul -de -sacs in commercial projects shall comply with City road standards. Alternate types of turnarounds may be considered by the Fire Chief as needed to accomplish the purpose of the Fire Code. F5 GRADE: The gradient for a fire apparatus roadway shall not exceed 20.0 %. Grades exceeding 15.0% (incline or decline) shall not be permitted without mitigation. Minimal mitigation shall be the installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems for structures accessed by such a roadway. F7 RESPONSE MAPS: Any development that by virtue of new structures necessitates fire hydrants, roadways, or similar features, shall be required to provide a map in a format compatible with current Department mapping services, and shall be charged a reasonable fee for updating all Fire Department response maps. F8 COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS: Prior to the delivery of combustible materials on the project site, water and sewer systems shall satisfactorily pass all required tests and be connected to the public water and sewer systems. In addition, the first lift of asphalt paving shall be in place to provide a permanent all- weather surface for emergency vehicles. Said access shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. F9 POSTING OF ROADWAYS: Emergency access roadways when required shall be properly identified as per Fire Department standards. F10 OBSTRUCTIONS (ACCESS ROADWAYS): All traffic lanes shall be a minimum of 24 feet in width during construction and shall be maintained clear and free of obstructions during construction in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. I'll FIRE HYDRANTS & FIRE FLOWS: The applicant shall provide fire hydrants of a type, number, and location satisfactory to the Encinitas Fire Department. A letter from the water agency serving the area shall be provided that states the required fire flow is available. Fire hydrants shall be of a bronze type. A two -sided blue reflective road marker shall be installed on the road surface to indicate the location of the fire hydrant for approaching fire apparatus. CD(G)/Nod/Noticdec 98272TPM.NOD(12- 10-99) 12 F12 FUEL MODIFICATION ZONES: The applicant shall provide and maintain fire /fuel breaks to the satisfaction of the Encinitas Fire Department. F13 ADDRESS NUMBERS: Address numbers shall be placed in a location that will allow them to be clearly visible from the street fronting the structure. The height of the address numbers shall conform to Fire Department Standards. F14 ADDRESS NUMBERS FOR STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF ROADWAY: Where structures are located off a roadway on long driveways, a monument marker shall be placed at the entrance where the driveway intersects the main roadway. Permanent address numbers with height conforming to Fire Department standards shall be affixed to this marker. F15A AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM - SINGLE - FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES: Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. In accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, this decision may be appealed to the City Council within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this determination. This notice constitutes a decision of the Community Development Department only. Additional permits, including Building Permits, may be required by the Building Department or other City Departments. It is the property owner's responsibility to obtain all necessary permits required for the type of project proposed. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact Bob Scott, AICP with the Community Development Department at (760) 633 -2713. '3:-:! 4/", Sandra Holder Community Development Director CD(G)17Vod/Noticdecl98272TPM. NOD(12 -10.99) 13 CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Services Department - 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, Ca. 92024 -3633 Phone (760) 633 -2770 Fax (760) 633 -2818 TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Chicago Title Company Date: April 30, 2001 925 "B" Street Job. No. TPM 98 -272 San Diego, Ca. 92101 Ref No. 203066778- U50(Adams Run) Tom Votel /Ken Cyr- Title Officer (619) 544 -6233 RE: Tentative Parcel Map Number 98 -272 for recordation Enclosed: • Map Mylars for TPM 98 -272 Please return recorded map mylars to the City of Encinitas. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2839. Thank you. From: Tamara O'Neal Assistant Civil Engineer c: File PARCEL MAP GUARANTEE JAN 18 2001 Guarantee No. 203066778 U50 Fee: Dated:JANUARY 11, 2001 at 7:30 AM Map No. Subdivision: TPM 98 -272 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES The County of SAN DIEGO and any City within which said subdivision is located in a sum not exceeding $1,000-00 that, according to those public records which, under the recording law, impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the land included within the exterior boundary shown on the map of the above referenced subdivision, the only parties having any record title interest in said land whose signatures are necessary, under the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, on the certificates consenting to the recordation of said map and offering for dedication any streets, roads, avenues, and other easements offered for dedication by said map are set forth in Schedule A. Issuing Office: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 925 "H" STREET SAN DIEGO, 61 ) 92101 239 By: YT PHONE NO. (619) 239 -6081 FAX NO. (619) 544 -6277 Authorized Signature PM -- 10 /26 /a5 AA John Rau President By: (� Thomas J. Adams Secretary OrdOr No: 203066778 -U50 Dated: January 11, 2001 at7:30 A.M. Subdivision: TPM 98 -272 SCHEDULE A The map hereinbefore referred to is a subdivision of: SEE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION The parties hereinbefore referred to are: OWNER: ADAMS RUN, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TRUST DEED HOLDERS: MapNo: TPM 98 -272 Fax Number: (619)544 -6292 OSMO C. CONTE, AS BENEFICIARY UNDER UNRECORDED DEED OF TRUST DATED DECEMBER 21, 2000 AND DISCLOSED BY SUBORDINATION AGREEMENTS RECORDED JANUARY 16, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001 - 0023028 AND 2001 - 0023029, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. GENERAL BANK, AS BENEFICIARY UNDER DEEDS OF TRUST RECORDED JANUARY 16, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001 - 0023025 AND 2001- 0023026, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. EASEMENT HOLDERS: (1) THE SIGNATURES OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, OWNERS OF AN EASEMENT AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 1955 IN BOOK 5919, PAGE 565 AND NOVEMBER 15, 1977 AS FILE NO. 77- 472334, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY HAS BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436, SUBSECTION (A)(3)(A)(I) OF GOVERNMENT CODE, THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURES ARE NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY. (2) THE SIGNATURES OF OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, OWNERS OF AN EASEMENT AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED MAY 3, 1961 AS FILE NO. 76608; JANUARY 31, 1962 AS FILE NO. 18555; OCTOBER 11, 1974 AS FILE NO. 74- 272832 AND DECEMBER 6, 1988 AS FILE NO. 88- 630378, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY HAS BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436, SUBSECTION (A)(3)(A)(I) OF GOVERNMENT CODE, THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURES ARE NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT SUHDIVA- 12/22/88 Policy No. - Page 1 (3) THE SIGNATURE OF CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT, OWNER OF AN EASEMENT AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 10, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994- 0655276, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY HAS BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436, SUBSECTION (A)(3)(A)(I) OF GOVERNMENT CODE, THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY. (4) THE SIGNATURE OF VARIOUS OWNERS OF RECORD, OWNER OF AN EASEMENT AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 11, 1959 IN BOOK 7710, PAGE 351; JANUARY 31, 1964 AS FILE NO. 19804 AND DECEMBER 31, 1971 AS FILE NO. 306534, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY HAS BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436, SUBSECTION (A)(3)(A)(I) OF GOVERNMENT CODE, THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO P. FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY. (5) THE SIGNATURES OF JAY REFOLD AND DEBRA REFOLD, HUSBAND AND WIFE, OWNERS OF AN EASEMENT AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED JANUARY 11, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001- 0018034 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY HAVE BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436, SUBSECTION (A)(3)(A)(I) OF GOVERNMENT CODE, THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY. (6) THE SIGNATURES OF CRAIG O. LEWIS AND JANICE S. LEWIS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, OWNERS OF AN EASEMENT AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED JANUARY 11, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001 - 0016035 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY HAVE BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436, SUBSECTION (A)(3)(A)(1) OF GOVERNMENT CODE, THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY. k HIBIT - 12 /n /M Page 1 DESCRIPTION Order No. 203066778 PARCEL 1: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF: EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY VEINS OR LODES, OF QUARTZ, OR OTHER ROCK, IN PLACE BEARING GOLD, SILVER, CINNABAR, LEAD, TIN, COPPER OR OTHER VALUABLE DEPOSITS WITHIN THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED AS KNOWN TO EXIST ON OR PRIOR TO MARCH 9, 1925. PARCEL 2: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, NORTH 88 °09'47" EAST, APPROXIMATELY 125.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 20.00 FOOT EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1 IN DEED TO OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED MAY 3. 1961 AS FILE NO. 76608 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 3: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. PARCEL 4: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANCH 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AND WITHIN LOT 16 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1898, ALL BEING IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16 AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 6085, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 14, 1962, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5, THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 03 057'39" EAST, 1029.04 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESIGNATED AS POINT "A ", THENCE SOUTH 86 000'00" WEST, 149.53 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 6085 AND BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RETRACING NORTH 86 000'00" Page 2 DESCRIPTION Order No. 203066778 EAST, 149.53 FEET TO SAID POINT "A" ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5, THENCE NORTH 86 000'00" EAST, 130.41 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38 017'20 ", A DISTANCE OF OF 132.70 FEET, THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 47 °42'40" EAST 408.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 051'20" A DISTANCE OF OF 139.12 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87 034'00" EAST 254.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 006'20" A DISTANCE OF 210.36 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 63 027'40" EAST, 292.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 012'03" A DISTANCE OF 84.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87039'43" EAST; 640.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER NORTH 87 °15'43" EAST, 1321.28 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION S. SAID EASEMENT TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN THE CENTER LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AND TO TERMINATE EASTERLY IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5. PARCEL 5: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, OVER A STRIP OF LAND 600.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID 60.00 FOOT STRIP BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4. PARCEL 6: AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THEREOF OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT 'B" PARCEL 2 OF DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1964 AS FILE NO. 19804 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LYING WITHIN THE NORTHERLY 30.00 FEET OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1185, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON DECEMBER 21, 1972 AS FILE NO. 340331 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. COSMO C. CONTE and CYNTHIA A. CONTE, husband and wife y d,b.a Cardiff Properties do hereby GRANT to Thu lostrliheat filed for record by Cmca3a ilia ra,npcny ae ;n •=rnmodation only. It has not ADAMS RUN, L.P. , a California limited partnership, bae7 esemlred as to As execution cc as to b itftct upon the title. the real property in the Oity of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, described as For description of property see Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. Dated: D enba N R 3000 CCSMO C. CONE sTa^c OF CAD1PORtrna Co1Rlei or SAN DIEGO 1 on 1)eC!-e b4✓ ZT, ZOOO before me, the undersigned, a Notary public in ud for said State, personally appeared COSMO C CONTE and CYNTHIA A. CONTE personally known to In- ve e or prod to ne on the boats satisfactory evidence to be the persons) rhos. .ornate) Sa /axe subscribed to the within _aalrunant and acknowledged to ne !hat he /she /they exec ted the came in his /ber /their authorized capaoity(iesl, and that by his/her /their abehatu efawhich the m instruent the person(s), or the entity upo n person(,) acted. executed the instrument. w :TTss ny band and official --Al i CONTE JERI LYNN SHAY �Commision 9 1231Kii5 Notary Public - Cali, In Son Diego CWrdy t l7 MY Conm E�ies Oc.?ID3 I2his azea for official noeazial aea1) Signatur� (T )..isa � eR MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE DOC # 2-U00- 0718029 Dec 29, 2000 2 :05 PV1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: OFFICIAL REMS Chicago T4 -'.a Cnmpacy _ W DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE order No. GRE6r�RY J. SMITH, MTV RECORDER Lscroa No. Loran No. �sss 2ssss1 FEES: 994.CO LWw OC: DC rNG WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Vlr,ES Adams Run, L.P. FNC N I1nnI111II upnpnVAVA IIppII'''' II(II�t�J'�II_ c/o RSF Ben, Inc San Die o, CA 92198 -0649 Spa c£ a MAIL TAX STATEMENTS T0: D°YOtl=TrARY T�SFER TAX $ . 2 U il� \�K empLLted on the consideration of velus a yr W.,ty eenveyedj OR da_^ls Run, L.P. c/o RSF Ben, Inc. Coe,pu tad tl+e eons ld.ratlo pppr value ... liens or eneembranaes ini cue th tivf eyie./ p. O. Box 270649 L/` v San Diego, CA 92198 -0649 s _ azure of Decl�t a-.t or agent date in' tyr e�P ". e��Lt�QG 0`4M -r, U L el IE A I, 8 J r APN ;2 -Y,0 - QS GRANT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is harelry acknowledged, COSMO C. CONTE and CYNTHIA A. CONTE, husband and wife y d,b.a Cardiff Properties do hereby GRANT to Thu lostrliheat filed for record by Cmca3a ilia ra,npcny ae ;n •=rnmodation only. It has not ADAMS RUN, L.P. , a California limited partnership, bae7 esemlred as to As execution cc as to b itftct upon the title. the real property in the Oity of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, described as For description of property see Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. Dated: D enba N R 3000 CCSMO C. CONE sTa^c OF CAD1PORtrna Co1Rlei or SAN DIEGO 1 on 1)eC!-e b4✓ ZT, ZOOO before me, the undersigned, a Notary public in ud for said State, personally appeared COSMO C CONTE and CYNTHIA A. CONTE personally known to In- ve e or prod to ne on the boats satisfactory evidence to be the persons) rhos. .ornate) Sa /axe subscribed to the within _aalrunant and acknowledged to ne !hat he /she /they exec ted the came in his /ber /their authorized capaoity(iesl, and that by his/her /their abehatu efawhich the m instruent the person(s), or the entity upo n person(,) acted. executed the instrument. w :TTss ny band and official --Al i CONTE JERI LYNN SHAY �Commision 9 1231Kii5 Notary Public - Cali, In Son Diego CWrdy t l7 MY Conm E�ies Oc.?ID3 I2his azea for official noeazial aea1) Signatur� (T )..isa � eR MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE EXHIBIT A 12523 PARCEL 1: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY VEINS OR LODES, OF QUARTZ, OR OTHER ROCK, IN PLACE BEARING GOLD, SILVER, CINNABAR, LEAD, TIN, COPPER OR OTHER VALUABLE DEPOSITS WITHIN THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED, tiHICH MAY HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED AS KNOWN TO EXIST ON OR PRIOR TO MARCH 9, 1925. PARCEL 2: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER; ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER NORTH 88 °09'47" EAST, APPROXIMATELY 125.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 20.00 FOOT EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1 IN DEED TO OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED MAY 3, 1961 AS FILE NO. 76608, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 3: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. PARCEL 4: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENACES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AND WITHIN LOT 16 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUA7T'Y RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, .TUNE 27, 1898, ALL BEING IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16 AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MA--P NO. 6085, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 14, 1962, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 03 °57'39" EAST, 1029.04 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESIGNATED AS POINT "A "; THENCE SOUTH 86 000'00" WEST 149.53 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 6085 AND BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RETRACING NORTH 86 °00'00" EAST, 149.53 FEET TO SAID POINT "A" ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 86 000'00" EAST, 130.41 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 12524 TANENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38 °17'20 ", A DISTANCE OF 132.70 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 47 °42'40" EAST, 408.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 051'20" A DISTANCE OF 139.12 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87 °34'00" EAST 254.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 006'20" A DISTANCE OF 210.36 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 63 027'40" EAST, 292.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 012'03" A DISTANCE OF 84.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87 039'43" EAST, 640.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, NORTH 87 °15'43" EAST, 1321.28 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5. SAID EASEMENT TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN THE CENTER LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AND TO TERMINATE EASTERLY IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5. PARCEL 5: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, OVER A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID 60.00 FOOT STRIP BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4. 'CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY SECOND AMENDED Reference: MAP -ADAMS RUN L.L.P PRELIMINARY REPORT Dated as of: January 11. 2001 at 7:30 AM Order No.: 203066778 - U50 JAN 18 2001 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or of t e date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception in Schedule B or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in the attached list. Copies of the Policy forms are available upon request. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to in Schedule B and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in the attached list of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY Title Department: Visit Us On The Web westerndivision. ctt. corn 0 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 925 "B" STREET SAN DIEGO, CA. 92101 (619)544 -6233 fax (619)544 -6279 TOM VOTEL ; KEN CYR TITLE OFFICER PfP - 08'05199bk SCHEDULE A Order No: 203066778 U50 Your Ref: MAP - ADAMS RUN L.L.P. 1. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: A FEE AS TO PARCEL 1; AN EASEMENT MORE FULLY DESCRIBED BELOW AS TO PARCELS 2 THROUGH 6 2. Tide to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: ADAMS RUN, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of SAN DIEGO and is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION Page 1 DESCRIPTION Order No. 203066778 PARCEL 1: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF: EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY VEINS OR LODES, OF QUARTZ, OR OTHER ROCK, IN PLACE BEARING GOLD, SILVER, CINNABAR, LEAD, TIN, COPPER OR OTHER VALUABLE DEPOSITS WITHIN THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED AS KNOWN TO EXIST ON OR PRIOR TO MARCH 9, 1925. PARCEL 2: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, NORTH 88 009'47" EAST, APPROXIMATELY 125.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 20.00 FOOT EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1 IN DEED TO OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED MAY 3, 1961 AS FILE NO. 76608 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 3: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. PARCEL 4: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANCH 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AND WITHIN LOT 16 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1898, ALL BEING IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16 AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 6085, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 14, 1962, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5, THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 03 057'39" EAST, 1029.04 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESIGNATED AS POINT "A ", THENCE SOUTH 86 000'00" WEST, 149.53 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 6085 AND BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RETRACING NORTH 86 000'00" Page 2 DESCRIPTION Order NO. 203066778 EAST, 149.53 FEET TO SAID POINT "A" ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5, THENCE NORTH 86 °00'00" EAST, 130.41 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38 °17'20 ", A DISTANCE OF OF 132.70 FEET, THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 47042'40" EAST 408.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 051'20" A DISTANCE OF OF 139.12 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87 034'00" EAST 254.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 006'20" A DISTANCE OF 210.36 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 63 027'40" EAST, 292.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 012'03" A DISTANCE OF 84.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87039'43" EAST; 640.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER NORTH 87015'43" EAST, 1321.28 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5. SAID EASEMENT TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN THE CENTER LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AND TO TERMINATE EASTERLY IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5. PARCEL 5: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, OVER A STRIP OF LAND 600.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID 60.00 FOOT STRIP BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4. PARCEL 6: AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THEREOF OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT 'B" PARCEL 2 OF DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1964 AS FILE NO. 19804 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LYING WITHIN THE NORTHERLY 30.00 FEET OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1185, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON DECEMBER 21, 1972 AS FILE NO. 340331 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SCHEDULE B Page 1 Order No: 203066778 U50 Your Ref: MAP - ADAMS RUN L.L.P. At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in the policy form designated on the face page of this Report would be as follows: 1. PROPERTY TAXES, INCLUDING ANY ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED WITH TAXES, TO BE LEVIED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2001 -2002 THAT ARE A LIEN NOT YET DUE. PROPERTY TAXES, INCLUDING ANY PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES AND ANY ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED WITH TAXES, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2000 -2001. 1ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT: PENALTY AND COST HOMEOWNERS EXEMPTION: CODE AREA: ASSESSMENT NO: $3,303.23 PAID $3,303.23 $340.32 (DUE AFTER APRIL 10) $-NONE - 19073 264 - 451 -05 B 2. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. 3. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL OR ESCAPED ASSESSMENTS OF PROPERTY TAXES, IF ANY, MADE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 0.5, CHAPTER 3.5 OR PART 2, CHAPTER 3, ARTICLES 3 AND 4 RESPECTIVELY (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75) OF THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS A RESULT OF THE TRANSFER OF TITLE TO THE VESTEE NAMED IN SCHEDULE A; OR AS A RESULT OF CHANGES IN OWNERSHIP OR NEW CONSTRUCTION OCCURRING PRIOR TO DATE OF POLICY. 4. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES, INGRESS AND EGRESS RECORDED: DECEMBER 28,�1955'IN BOOK 5919 PAGE 565, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE SOUTHERLY 12 FEET OF PARCEL 1 E 5. THE RIGHT, IF ANY, TO THE USE OF THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND FOR THE EXTRACTION AND /OR DEVELOPMENT OF MINERALS AS EXECPTED AND /OR RESERVED BY THEODORE E. KOONS, ET UX IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 11, 1959 IN BOOK 7710, PAGE 351, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. e 6. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT PREB 10/31/97bk Page 2 Order No: 203066778 U50 r, k SCHEDULE B (continued) Your Ref: MAP - ADAMS RUN L.L.P. PURPOSE: PIPELINES RECORDED: MAY 3, 1961 AS FILE NO. 76608, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. 7. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT PURPOSE: PIPELINES , RECORDED: JANUARY'31, 1962 AS FILE NO. 18555, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. 8. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT PURPOSE: I:Zi)a��1Ue)A[yiyU�4Y1gN.9 AS GRANTED /RESERVED BY VARIOUS INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD, ONE OF WHICH WAS RECORDED: JANUARY 31, 1964 AS FILE NO. 19804, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. 9. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS RESERVED IN A DOCUMENT (NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE AS TO THE PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF SAID EASEMENT) PURPOSE: ROAD, UTILITIES RECORDED: DECEMBER 31, 1971 AS FILE NO. 306534, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. SAID EASEMENT HAS BEEN CONVEYED AND /OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD. 10. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT PURPOSE: PIPELINES RECORDED: OCTOBER 11, 1974 AS FILE NO. 74- 272832, OF OFFICIAL P EUMBC- 8 /n /Mbk Page 3 Order No: 203066778 U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) Your RcL MAP - ADAMS RUN L.L.P. RECORDS AFFECTS: THE NORTHERLY 20 FEET OF PARCEL 1 L 11. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES, INGRESS AND EGRESS RECORDED: NOVEMBER 15,'1977 AS FILE NO. 77- 472334, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. If 12. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE "SAN DIEGUITO REORGANIZATION ", AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 390249, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. N 13. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE "ENCINITAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT REORGANIZATION ", AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 30, 1987 AS FILE NO. B7- 659937, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 14. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT PURPOSE: A PIPELINE OR PIPELINES RECORDED: DECEMBER 8, 1988 AS FILE NO. 88- 630378, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. a 15. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT PURPOSE: SEWER PURPOSES RECORDED: NOVEMBER110,'1994� AS FILE NO. 1994 - 0655276, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. 4 16. AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN DATED: JANUARY 19, 1995 BY AND BETWEEN: OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT AND CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT 9gELIMBC- 9 /M /93bM SCHEDULE B Page 4 (continued) Order NO: 203066778 U50 Your Ref: MAP - ADAMS RUN L.L.P. RECORDED: APRIL 24, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0171789, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS REGARDING: OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. 170 REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS x 17. EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS, PIPELINES, DRAINAGE AND /OR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES THERETO OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE EASEMENT PARCEL(S) HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED AND /OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS DEEDS OF RECORD. AFFECTS: PARCELS 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6 9 18. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. u 19. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND WAS ANNEXED TO THE CARIFF SANITATION DISTRICT BY DOCUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 22, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000 - 0445965, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 20. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS IN THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT SHOWN BELOW AMOUNT: $643,000.00 DATED: DECEMBER 21, 2000 TRUSTOR: ADAMS RUN, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TRUSTEE: CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: COSMO C. CONTE NOT RECORDED, BUT DISCLOSED BY: TWO SUBORDINATION AGREEMENTS RECORDED: JANUARY 16, 2001 AS FILE NO. 01- 023028 AND 01- 023029, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS .0 AN AGREEMENT WHICH STATES THAT THIS INSTRUMENT WAS SUBORDINATED TO: A DEED OF TRUST RECORDED: JANUARY 16, 2001 AS FILE NO. 01- 023025, OFFICIAL RECORDS BY AGREEMENT RECORDED: JANUARY 16, 2001 AS FILE NO. 01- 023028, OFFICIAL RECORDS AN AGREEMENT WHICH STATES THAT THIS INSTRUMENT WAS SUBORDINATED PRELIMBC- 9/23/93bk SCHEDULE B Page 5 (continued) Order No: 203066778 U50 Your Ref: MAP - ADAMS RUN L.L.P. TO: A DEED OF TRUST RECORDED: JANUARY 16, 2001 AS FILE NO. 01- 023026, OFFICIAL RECORDS BY AGREEMENT RECORDED: JANUARY 16, 2001 AS FILE NO. 01- 023029, OFFICIAL RECORDS AB 21. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: JAY REFOLD AND DEBRA REFOLD, HUSBAND AND WIFE PURPOSE: ROAD AND UTILITY RECORDED: JANUARY 11, 2001 AS FILE NO. 01- 018034, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. AC 22. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: CRAIG O. LEWIS AND JANICE S. LEWIS, HUSBAND AND WIFE PURPOSE: ROAD AND UTILITY RECORDED: JANUARY 11, 2001 AS FILE NO. 01- 018035, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. AD 23. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN BELOW IN THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT SHOWN AMOUNT: $2,665,700.00 DATED: DECEMBER 15, 2000 TRUSTOR: ADAMS RUN, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHI TRUSTEE: CHICAGO TITLE BENEFICIARY: GENERAL BANK RECORDED: JANUARY 16, 2001 AS FILE NO. 01- 023025, OFFICIAL RECORDS ORIGINAL LOAN NUMBER: 70- 13339550 ae 24. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS IN THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT SHOWN BELOW AMOUNT: $77,208.00 DATED: DECEMBER 15, 2000 TRUSTOR: ADAMS RUN L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SCHEDULE B Page 6 (continued) Order No: 203066778 U50 Your Ref: MAP - ADAMS RUN L.L.P. TRUSTEE: CHICAGO TITLE BENEFICIARY: GENERAL BANK RECORDED: JANUARY 16, 2001 AS FILE NO. 01- 023026, OFFICIAL RECORDS SAID DEED OF TRUST RECITES THAT IT IS SUBORDINATE TO THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDED CONCURRENTLY THEREWITH. 25. A FINANCING STATEMENT FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, SHOWING DEBTOR: ADAMS RUN, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SECURED PARTY: GENERAL BANK RECORDED: JANUARY 16, 2001 AS FILE NO. 01- 023027, OFFICIAL RECORDS v END OF SCHEDULE B x MGC IAMEND /AT 2AMEND /JRS t y.r ° uD NOV 1 4 2000 ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -242 Olivenhain, CA. GENERAL PARTNER: RSF Ben Inc. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT Adams Run, L.P. IST� a►� �co 04 j��k4� LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I. NAME OF PARTNERSHIP 7 1.1 Name of Partnership ► 4131*6IaJII:i110:4'I: 7 2.1 Name of Partners ARTICLE III. PURPOSE OF PARTNERSHIP 8 3.1 Partnership - Purpose ARTICLE IV. TERM OF PARTNERSHIP 8 4.1 Term of Partnership ' I1:TN�I�]a 18,14INMCI 8 5.1 Place of Business ARTICLE VI. CAPITALIZATION AND FINANCING 8 6.1 Initial Capital Contributions 9 6.2 No Additional Capital Required 9 6.3 Withdrawal of Capital 9 6.4 Return of Contribution 9 6.5 Capital Accounts 9 6.6 Partnership Loans , ARTICLE VII. PARTNERSHIP ACCOUNTING, ALLOCATIONS, AND DISTRIBUTIONS. 10 7.1 Partnership Records 10 7.2 Partnership Tax Returns 11 7.3 Business Calendar Year 11 7.4 Accountings 11 7.5 Audit of Partnership Records 11 7.6 Sale of Assets 11 7.7 Definitions of Distributable Cash, Profits and Losses 12 7.8 Reimbursement Fee 12 7.9 Allocation of Profits and Losses; Distribution of Distributable Cash 12 7.10 Recapture of Investment Credit and Depreciation 12 7.11 Value of Distribution 12 7.12 Withdrawal of Limited Partners With No Remaining Interest in Profits or Capital. ARTICLE VIII. MANAGEMENT, AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERALPARTNERS 13 8.1 Management by General Partner 13 8.2 Specific Powers of General Partners 14 8.3 Limitations on Powers of General Partners 15 8.4 Devotion of Time 15 8.5 Establish Bank Accounts 15 8.6 Individual Financial Information 15 8.7 Operating Budget Plan 16 8.8 Compensation of General Partner 16 8.9 Indemnification 16 8.10 Time Devoted to Partnership ARTICLE IX. RIGHTS AND POWERS OF THE GENERAL PARTNERS 16 9.1 Powers of Limited Partners 16 9.2 Rights of Limited Partners 17 9.3 Representatives of Limited Partners 17 9.4 Arbitration ARTICLE X. INSURANCE 17 10.1 Types of Insurance 18 10.2 Insurance Coverage ARTICLE XI. LIABILITY 18 11.1 Limitation of Liability 18 11.2 Assumption of Liability ARTICLE XII. TRANSFER 19 12.1 Transfer of Interest of a General Partner 19 12.2 Transfer of Interest of a Limited Partner 19 12.3 Transfer of Interest of a Limited Partner into Trust 3 i 19 12.4 Admission of Additional Limited Partners 19 12.5 Elections of Certain Partners on Certain Events 19 A. Default 20 B. Withdrawal 20 C. Death of a Partner 20 D. Act of Bankruptcy 21 12.6 Rights of Remaining Partners 21 12.7 Notice of Default 21 12.8 Default Based on Gross Negligence Willful Neglect or Dishonesty of General Partner ARTICLE XIII. DISSOLUTION OF THE PARTNERSHIP 22 13.1 Dissolution and Winding Up 22 A. Dissolution Upon Consent 22 B. Dissolution Upon Loss of General Partner 22 C. Dissolution Upon Sale or Disposition of Assets 22 D. Dissolution Upon Judicial Decree 22 13.2 Effect of Dissolution 22 13.3 Responsibility for Winding Up 23 13.4 Liquidation and Distribution on Dissolution 23 13.5 Filing Certificate of Dissolution 23 13.6 Cancellation of Certificate of Partnership ARTICLE X1V. MISCELLANEOUS 23 14.1 Limited Partnership Certificate 24 14.2 Power of Attorney 4 l 24 14.3 Amendments 24 14.4 Notices 24 14.5 Counterparts 25 14.6 Successors 25 14.7 Governing Law 25 14.8 Severability 25 14.9 Entire Agreement 25 14.10 Federal Income Tax Elections 25 14.11 Captions for Convenience 25 14.12 Waiver of Right to Partition 25 14.13 Numbering for Convenience 25 14.14 Gender 26 14.15 Attorney Fees 26 14.16 Priority 26,27 14.17 Representations of the Limited Partnership Sections A -J 28 14.18 Execution of Documents 6 EXHIBITS: Attached A Legal Description 29 B Equity contributions and disbursement schedule Attached +PG 31 C Operating Budget Plan 31 D Individual's Capital Account LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT THIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT is made as of the date this document is executed below. The parties hereby agree to form a Limited Partnership pursuant to the provisions of the California Revised Limited Partnership Act as follows: ARTICLE I NAME OF PARTNERSHIP 1.1 Name of Partnership: The name of the Partnership shall be Adams Run, L.P. The Partnership shall hold title to its property, enter into contracts and do business in the Partnership's name unless all partners agree otherwise. ARTICLE II NAME OF PARTNERS 2.1 Names of Partners: The names of the partners are as follows: GENERALPARTNER: Name: Address: RSF BEN INC. 16885 W. Bernardo Drive, Suite 385 San Diego, CA 92127 LIMITED PARTNERS: Name: Address: John Silverwood 16885 W. Bernardo Drive, Suite 385 San Diego, CA 92198 7 ARTICLE III PURPOSE OF PARTNERSHIP 3.1 Partnership - Purpose: A The purpose of the Partnership is to: (1) provide the equity financing requirements for the construction lender at the residential subdivision known as Tract No. TPM98 -242, as is described in Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as though set forth in full, and (2), to engage in all necessary and/or proper activities related to the improvement, development, and sale thereof, and (3) to engage in any business activities reasonably incident and appropriate thereto. B. The purpose and activity of the Partnership shall be limited as stated in this Article. ARTICLE IV TERM OF PARTNERSHIP 4.1 Term of Partnership: The Partnership term shall begin on the date of filing the Certificate of Limited Partnership with the Secretary of State. The Partnership shall continue for a period of twenty-four (24) months or until the occurrence of an Event of Dissolution as provided in this Agreement. ARTICLE V PLACE OF BUSINESS 5.1 Place of Business: The principal place of business of the Partnership shall be 16885 W. Bernardo Drive, Suite 385, San Diego, CA 92127 or such other place or places as may be mutually agreed on by the parties hereto. ARTICLE VI CAPITALIZATION AND FINANCING OF THE PARTNERSHIP 6.1 Initial Capital Contributions: A. The initial Contribution of the General Partner to the Partnership shall consist of General Partner's capacity to deliver the property to the partnership. 8 B. Limited Partners. The Limited Partners shall be required to make an initial capital contribution. The capital contribution shall be $79,500.00 C. The General Partner shall maintain on Exhibit `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof, a listing of all contributions to capital made by all General and Limited Partners, which shall be revised as needed. 6.2 No Additional Capital Required: Each of the partners agrees that none of the parties to this Agreement shall be required to contribute additional capital. 6.3 Withdrawal of Capital: No partner shall withdraw any portion of the capital of the partnership without the written consent of the other partners. 6.4 Return of Contribution: No partner shall have the right to withdraw his capital contributions or to receive any funds or property of the Partnership except as specifically provided herein. In the event of a permitted withdrawal of a partner's contribution to capital, such partner shall not have the right to demand or receive property other than cash in return for his contribution. 6.5 Capital Accounts: An individual capital account shall be maintained for each partner. Each partner's capital account shall consist of his original capital contribution increased by any additional authorized capital contributions, and his share of partnership profits, and decreased by distributions to him in reduction of partnership capital and his share of partnership losses (see exhibit "D "). 6.6 Partnership Loans: In the event the partnership requires additional funds over and above those heretofore described, the General Partner may secure a loan for the project at his sole discretion. Funds thus acquired can be used solely for the project and cannot be used by the General Partner for costs of management and/or supervision. The loan may be used for purchase of the models or other necessary uses such as cost overruns not anticipated at funding of the Construction Loan. PARTNERSHIP ACCOUNTING, ALLOCATIONS, AND DISTRIBUTIONS 7.1 Partnership Records: At all times during the term of the Partnership and beyond the term of this Partnership, for a minimum period equal to tax record retention period requirements, the General Partner shall keep at the office previously referred to in this Agreement as the Partnership's principal place of business the following Partnership documents: (a) A current list of the full name and last known business or residence address of each partner set forth in alphabetical order together with the contribution and the share in profits and losses of each partner. (b) A copy of the certificate of limited partnership and all certificates of amendment thereto, together with executed copies of any powers of attorney pursuant to which any certificate has been executed. (c) Copies of the limited partnership's federal, state, and local income tax or information returns and reports, if any, for the six most recent taxable years. (d) Copies of the original partnership agreement and all amendments thereto. (e) Financial statements of the limited partnership for the six most recent fiscal years. (f) The Partnership's books and records, in which each Partnership transaction shall be entered fully and accurately, for the current and past three tax years. Upon the request of a limited partner, the general partner shall promptly deliver to the limited partner, at the expense of the partnership, a copy of the information required to be maintained by subparagraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) of this section. The limited partners shall also have the right upon reasonable request to inspect and copy during normal business hours any of the partnership records required to be maintained by this section. 7.2 Partnership Income Tax Returns: A copy of each annual income tax return of the Partnership shall be given to each partner within ten (10) days after the return is completed to the satisfaction of the General Partners. 10 7.3 Business Calendar Year: The business calendar year of the Partnership shall begin on January 1, and end on December 31 of each year. 7.4 Accountings: A complete accounting of the Partnership affairs as of the close of business on the last day of each year shall be rendered to each partner within seventy-five (75) days after the close of each fiscal year including any K -1 returns or other partnership returns. Except as to errors brought to the attention of other partners within seventy (70) days after its rendition, each such accounting shall be final and conclusive as to the partners. The accounting shall be conducted by an independent accountant or accounting firm selected by the General Partner. 7.5 Audit of Partnership Records: Any time during the term of the Partnership, the Limited Partner may, at his expense, require an audit of the Partnership books. Such audit may be conducted by Certified Public Accountants selected by those Limited Partners requesting the audit. 7.6 Sale of Assets: At such time as a project, which is the subject of this Limited Partnership, has been completed, or earlier if agreed upon by the partners, the property shall be sold forthwith. Upon the sale of the property, all of the proceeds shall be distributed according to the provisions set forth below. 7.7 Definitions of Distributable Cash, Profits and Losses: The following definitions shall apply herein: A. "Distributable Cash" shall mean all cash of the Partnership, after excluding an amount of such cash equal to the amount necessary for payment of all costs, expenses, obligations and liabilities of the Partnership then due and payable, less reasonable reserves for contingencies. B. 'Profit" shall mean the balance of funds after payment of all obligations, costs and expenses of the Partnership and after the following priority of payments: (1) Payment of capital contributions to the partners in prorata proportion to their capital contributions. (2) Payment of any advances made against a Partner's share of profits; I 0 (3) Payment of interest and principal on any loans made to the partnership. 7.8 Reimbursement Fee: The General Partner shall receive, at the funding of the construction loan, any prepaid or other items identified as such in Exhibit "B" Contributions to Capital, provided the value of these items exceeds the contribution value of the General Partner as provided for in section 6.1a. 7.9 Allocation of Profits and Losses: and Distribution of Distributable Cash. (a) All Profits and losses shall be allocated to the respective Partners of the Partnership and all Distributable cash shall be distributed. For any year in which Substitute Limited Partners are admitted to the Partnership, each Substitute Limited Partner's allocable share of the profits and losses and Distributable Cash of the Partnership is limited to a share of those profits and losses incurred by the Partnership during the portion of the year in which he is a member of the Partnership, as determined by the General Partner. 7.10 Recapture of Investment Credit and Depreciation: Each of the parties agree that the recapture of investment credit and recapture of depreciation on the sale of any of the Partnership's property shall be allocated to the partners in the proportions that the investment tax credit and depreciation are allowed to the partners. 7.11 Value of Distributions: Any distribution or payment under this agreement of assets or property shall be valued at market value as of the date of transfer. 7.12 Withdrawl of Limited Partners With No Remaining Interest in Profits or Capital. At any date when a Limited Partner or a Class of Limited Partners in the Partnership cease to have an interest in Profits of the Partnership and in the capital of the Partnership, because of the satisfaction of priorities set forth in this Partnership Agreement for the allocation and distribution of Profits and Distributable Cash among the Partners, such Limited Partner or Class of Limited Partners shall be deemed to have withdrawn from the Partnership with the consent of the remaining Partners and shall cease to be a Partner. 12 V ARTICLE VIII MANAGEMENT, AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY OF GENERAL PARTNERS 8.1 Management by General Partners: The Partnership business shall be managed by the General Partner. Limited Partners shall have no right to take part in the management of the Partnership or to transact any business on its behalf except as provided under the Uniform Limited Partnership Act. 8.2 Specific Powers of General Partners: A. The General Partner shall have, subject to any limitations imposed elsewhere in this agreement, power on behalf of the Partnership to act with regard to any Partnership asset, real or personal, and to do anything reasonably connected with that action. B. Without Limiting the above authority, the General Partner shall have the power to construct or contract for the construction of improvements on real property. C. In addition to the above, and without limiting the above authority, the General Partner shall have all powers necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes, business, and objectives of the Partnership. All of the power and authority specifically granted in this agreement, or as may be otherwise provided by law, shall be construed broadly in favor of the General Partner's power to act. D. Without limiting the above authority, the General Partner shall also have the additional powers to employ, from time to time, at the expense of the Partnership, such accounting firms, brokers, and attorneys as the General Partner may determine to be necessary or appropriate. E. Without limiting the above, the General Partner shall, in their sole discretion, provided all fees are reasonable, have the ability to contract with all contractors, consulting firms, management firms, real estate firms and all other services and/or professional firms, irrespective of any price or bid obtained from competing firms, in order to maintain a standard of quality providing the combined amount of any such pricing or bids received do not cause the projected overall cost of the project to exceed those figures set forth in Exhibit "C ", attached hereto, except as provided in section 6.6, above. F. The General Partner shall be solely responsible for making and implementing the following decisions for the Limited Partnership: (1) The work and work schedule of the project; 13 (2) The securing of required building permits; (3) The selection of the subcontractors or workmen to be hired by the contractor; (4) The management, control and construction of improvements on the property; and (5) Those decisions and actions involved in dealing with regulatory agencies for processing of subdivision maps, and all similar discretionary and/or administrative approvals. 8.3 Limitations on Powers of General Partners: A. Actions Requiring Consent of All Partners. The General Partner, without prior consent or ratification of all the partners, shall have no authority to: (1) Do any act in contravention of the Uniform Limited Partnership Act, the Certificate of Limited Partnership or the stated purpose of this Agreement; (2) Do any act which would make it impossible to carry on the ordinary business of the Partnership, except terminate and dissolve the Limited Partnership as provided for herein; (3) Confess a judgment against the Partnership; (4) Admit a person as a partner; (5) Terminate the Partnership; (6) Make, execute, or deliver any general assignments for the benefit of creditors, or any bond, guaranty, indemnity bond, or surety bond; (7) Assign, transfer, pledge, compromise, or release any Limited Partnership claim except for full payment; (8) Amend or otherwise change this agreement so as to modify the rights or obligations of the partners as set forth; (9) Create any personal liability for any partner other than liability to which such partner may agree in writing; 14 (10) Use the name of the Partnership except in the ordinary course of the Partnership business; (11) Disclose to any non - partner any of the Partnership business practices, trade secrets, or any other information not generally known to the business community; or, (12) Remove a General Partner. (13) Assign, transfer, pledge, compromise, or release any Partnership Asset except for the purpose of furthering the purpose of this partnership 8.4 Devotion of Time: The General Partner is not obligated to devote full time to the affairs of the Partnership, but shall devote such time as is necessary and proper to carry on the Partnership business and effectuate its purposes. The General Partner may become involved in other businesses and occupations and other partnerships. The Limited Partners are not required to devote any time to the Partnership. 8.5 Establish Bank Accounts: No more than one Partnership bank account shall be established and checks on the accounts shall be signed by the General Partner is authorized to execute standard bank documentation to establish these accounts on the Partnership's behalf. The bank account shall be established at General Bank, Alhambra, CA 91801 8.6 Individual Financial Information: The General Partner shall furnish any financial data with respect to itself, himself, herself, and spouse, if any, reasonably required in connection with the procuring of financing for the Partnership's business. 8.7 Operating Budget Plan: The project shall have an Operating Budget Plan as described in Exhibit "C" which is attached hereto. The General Partner shall be authorized to produce and revise at his sole discretion the operating budget. 8.8 Compensation of General Partner: In addition to the aforementioned Partnership interest, the General Partner shall receive monthly overhead and supervision as defined in Exhibit "C ". In addition, a management fee shall be paid to the General Partner as stated in Exhibit "C ". 15 1i 8.9 Indemnification: The Partnership shall indemnify, hold harmless and pay all judgments against the General Partner (including the General Partner's employees and agents) for any claim, loss, liability or damage incurred by reason of any action or an act performed in good faith in connection with the business of the Partnership, including attorney's fees incurred by the General Partner in connection with the defense of any action based upon any such alleged act or omission, which attorneys' fees may be paid as incurred from Partnership funds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the General Partner nor the General Partner's employees or agents shall be relieved from any liability for fraud, bad faith, gross negligence, or willful misconduct. All judgments against the Partnership and the General Partner wherein the General Partner is entitled to indemnification as herein provided shall be satisfied from Partnership assets. The General Partner shall be indemnified and held harmless specifically from any and all actions taken in good faith and reasonable reliance upon advice of the Partnership's attorney or accountant, and any costs related to litigation incident to obligations secured by partnership property or to any tax authorities shall be borne by the Partnership. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall, expose or make Limited Partners liable to any extent or amount which would exceed their capital contributions or the assets of the Partnership, whichever is less. 8.10 Time Devoted to the Partnership: The General Partner is not required to devote all its business time to the Partnership. Limited Partners are not required to devote any time to the Partnership. ARTICLE IX RIGHTS AND POWERS OF THE LIMITED PARTNERS 9.1 Powers of Limited Partners: The Limited Partners shall not have either the obligation or the right to participate, directly or indirectly, in the management or control of the business of the Partnership. The Limited Partners shall not have any power to bind the Partnership in any contract, agreement, compromise, or undertaking. 9.2 Rights of Limited Partners: The Limited Partners shall have the same rights as the General Partner to: A. Have the Partnership books kept at the principal place of business of the Partnership, and at all times to inspect and copy any of them; 11M B. Have on demand true and full information of all things affecting the Partnership; C. Have the right to receive a share of the profits or other compensation by way of income, and the right to the return of their contributions upon dissolution or withdrawal as provided for in Article 13. 9.3 Representatives of Limited Partners: Each partner may designate a representative and an alternative representative to act on its behalf in connection with the Partnership. Each partner agrees that its representatives and alternative representative shall have the full and complete power and authority alone to act on its behalf to effectuate the purposes of this agreement, to execute documents in its name, and to bind it in all matters relating to the Limited Partnership, except that a representative or alternative representative shall not have any power or authority to appoint a new representative or alternative or to transfer or agree to transfer Limited Partnership real property or any interest therein. Either partner, may at any time, by written notice to the other partner, appoint a replacement for its representative or alternative representative, whose appointment shall be deemed effective upon the effective date of a notice as provided herein below. In addition, no action of the representatives or alternative representatives or alternative representatives shall be construed to modify or amend this agreement. 9.4 Arbitration: Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any action to enforce or interpret this Agreement, or to resolve disputes with respect to this Agreement as between the Limited Partnership and a Partner, or between or among the Partners, shall be submitted to the American Arbitration Association for binding arbitration in San Diego, California. The costs of the arbitration, including any American Arbitration Association administration fee, the arbitrator's fee and costs for the use of facilities during the hearings, shall be borne equally by the parties to the arbitration. Attorneys' fees may be awarded to the prevailing or most prevailing party at the discretion of the arbitrator. The provisions of Sections 1282.6, 1283, and 1283.05 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the arbitration. The arbitrator shall not have any power to alter, amend, modify or change any of the terms of this Agreement nor grant any remedy which is either prohibited by the terms of this Agreement, or not available in a court of law. "114011 W INSURANCE 10.1 Types of Insurance: The Limited Partnership shall obtain, carry and maintain in force the following insurance, the premiums of which shall be a cost and expense to be borne by the Limited Partnership: 17 r A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance covering the Employee of the Limited Partnership to the extent required by the laws of the State of California; B. Comprehensive general liability insurance covering the Limited Partnership; C. Automobile public liability insurance; D. Fire and extended coverage insurance; E. Such other insurance, including builder's risk insurance insuring against all risks customarily insured against by prudent owners of like properties in the applicable area. F. Additional Construction Defect insurance and/or Earth Movement insurance as may be determined to be necessary by the General Partner. G. Additional insurance for the General Partner, as is mutually agreed upon by the Partners. 10.2 Insurance Coveraee: All such aforesaid policies of insurance shall name the Limited Partnership as named insured. All such aforesaid policies of insurance shall meet with the approval of the Partners prior to their purchase and/or issuance. ARTICLE XI LIABILITY 11.1 Limitation of Liability: Except as provided in the following paragraphs or as required by law, the liability of the Limited Partner shall in no event exceed the aggregate amount of that Limited Partner's capital contributions required by this agreement, and any authorized additional capital contributions actually made, and that Partner's share of undistributed net profits of the Partnership. The General Partner shall provide evidence of the above named types of insurance to all partners, prior to the commencement of any construction on the property. 11.2 Assumption of Liability: At the election of the Limited Partners and upon the approval of the General Partner, the Limited Partners may assume personal liability on any Partnership debt. The General Partner may not force the Limited Partners to make such election and such assumption shall only apply to those Limited Partners who make such election. Said assumption will be on a pro rata basis in the proportions that the interests of those who elect to assume the debt bear to one another. This provision is solely for the benefit of the Limited Partners so as to enable the assuming Limited Partners to utilize debt as part of basis for tax purposes under applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and may not be relied upon by creditors of the Partnership unless and until such liabilities 18 r are expressly assumed. Any such assumption must be made in writing and such writing, signed by the Limited Partners, must be delivered to the General Partner. ARTICLE XII TRANSFER 12.1 Transfer of Interest of a General Partner: A General Partner may not transfer all or any part of his interest as a General Partner in the Partnership, except upon the event of death. 12.2 Transfer of Interest of a Limited Partner: A Limited Partner may not transfer all or any part of his interest as a Limited Partner in the Partnership. 12.3 Transfer of Interest of a Limited Partner into Trust: No consent shall be required of the Limited Partner upon a transfer of a Partnership interest to their Revocable Inter Vivos Trust and the transfer shall not be subject to the first right of refusal provisions of this agreement. All other provisions regarding the transfer of an interest shall be complied with, with the exception of the above. All provisions of this Article shall be complied with upon subsequent transfers of an interest by a Revocable Inter Vivos Trust except for the revocation of said trust and the transfer of the interest back to the original holder thereof. 12.4 Admission of Additional Limited Partners: No additional Limited Partners shall be admitted to the Partnership. 12.5 Elections of Certain Partners on Certain Events: A. Default: Except as provided in other parts of this Article XII, a Partner shall be deemed to be in default if any of the following occurs ('Event of Default "): (1) A partner commits a material breach of, or fails or becomes unable to perform any of his material obligations under this agreement, and such Partner fails to remedy such breach or failure within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from the other Partners; (2) A Partner makes any transfer, alteration or encumbrance in violation of this agreement; (3) A Partner seeks protection, either voluntarily or involuntarily, from the Federal Bankruptcy Court or commits an act of bankruptcy; or, 19 (4) A Partner prematurely withdraws. As a material term of this Agreement, no Partner may withdraw from the Partnership before thirty -six (36) months after commencement of the Term of this Agreement. If a Partner purports to withdraw from the Partnership prior to the above date, the Partner purporting to withdraw shall, in addition to any other remedies the non - withdrawing Partners may have, be liable to the non - withdrawing Partners for any damages resulting from the premature withdrawal. B. Withdrawal: For the purposes of this Agreement, "withdrawal' shall be defined to include, but not be limited to, involuntary as well as voluntary withdrawal. C. Death of a Partner: Upon the death of a Partner, the right to receive his share of the profits, losses and distributions shall pass to his personal representative or successor (or in the event of such death and if the Partnership interest is held in joint tenancy, the same shall pass to the surviving joint tenant), subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The estate and successor of the Partner shall be liable for all the obligations of the deceased Partner. D. Act of Bankruptcy: A Partner shall be deemed to have committed an act of bankruptcy and be "bankrupt' if any of the following events occur: (1) If a Partner files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or shall be adjudicated a bankrupt or insolvent, or shall file any petition or answer seeking any reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under the present or any future applicable federal, state or other statute or law relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or other relief for debtors, or shall seek or consent to or acquiesce in the appointment of any trustee, debtor in possession, receiver, conservator or liquidator of such Partner or all or any substantial part of his properties or his interest in the Partnership. The term "acquiesce" includes, but is not limited to, the failure to file a petition or motion to vacate or discharge any order, judgment or decree providing for such appointment within (10) days after the appointment; (2) If a court of competent jurisdiction shall enter an order, judgment or decree approving a petition filed against a Partner seeking any reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under the present or any future applicable federal, state, or other statute or law relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, or other relief for debtors, and the Partner acquiesces in the entry of such order, judgment or decree, or such order, judgment or decree and the same shall remain unvacated and unstayed for an aggregate of ninety (90) days (whether or not consecutive) from the date of entry thereof, or any trustee, debtor in possession, receiver, conservator, or liquidator of any Partner or of all or any substantial part of his property or his interest in the Partnership shall be 20 I. appointed and such appointment shall remain unvacated and unstayed for an aggregate of ninety (90) days, whether or not consecutive; (3) If a Partner gives notice to any governmental body of insolvency or pending insolvency or suspension or pending suspension of operations; or (4) If a Partner makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors or takes any other similar action for the protection or benefit of creditors. 12.6 Rights of the Remaining Partner: Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default or upon the death of the General Partner, the other Partners may, at their election and in addition to any other right or remedy they may have at law or in equity, elect to (a) continue the Partnership with such Partner's successor in interest, (b) purchase a pro rata share of the interest of such Partner at such value as determined by an independent appraiser selected by the General Partner, or (c) dissolve the Partnership. 12.7 Notice of Default: Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, the non - defaulting party shall give a Notice of Default to the partner that he is or is alleged to be in default. The Notice of Default shall set forth the nature of the obligations that the defaulting party has not performed. If the obligations specified in the Notice of Default are, by their nature, capable of being cured, the defaulting party shall have a period of thirty (30) days following the effective date of said Notice of Default within which to cure the same before that party shall be considered in default. If the defaulting party shall fail to cure the default or defaults within said thirty (30) day period, the defaulting party shall be irrevocably in default and the non - defaulting party shall thereafter be free to pursue the rights provided in this agreement, or any other remedy at law or in equity. 12.8 Default based on the Gross Negligence, Willful Neglector Dishonesty of General Partner In the event the General Partner willfully neglects to diligently operate the partnership business, or handles the partnership business in a grossly negligent manner, or commits an act of dishonesty in the conduct of the partnership business, the General Partner shall be immediately removed. Any interest of the General Partner in the Partnership shall be transferred to the remaining Limited Partners for a total compensation amount equal to the General Partner's initial capital account contribution. 21 I$ Iii 41 Col 4 *Mlltl DISSOLUTION OF THE PARTNERSHIP 13.1 Dissolution and Winding Up: The Partnership shall be dissolved, and its affairs shall be wound up upon the expiration of the term provided for or upon the occurrence of any of the following events: A. Dissolution Upon Consent: The Partnership shall be dissolved upon any date specified in a consent to Dissolution signed by all of the partners of the Limited Partnership. B. Dissolution Upon Loss of a General Partner: If a General Partner ceases to be a General Partner other than by removal, and there is no remaining General Partner, the Partnership shall dissolve and its affairs shall be wound up unless all of the Limited Partners agree in writing to continue the business of the Partnership and to the admission of one or more new General Partners. C. Dissolution Upon Sale or Disposition of Assets: Subsequent to the payments of costs, fees, and distribution of profit to the Limited Partner and the General Partner, the Partnership shall be dissolved. D. Dissolution Upon Judicial Decree: The Partnership shall be dissolved and its affairs shall be wound up when required by entry of a decree of judicial dissolution. 13.2 Effect of Dissolution: The occurrence of an Event of Dissolution shall dissolve the Partnership and the agency relationship between the Limited Partners and the General Partners. 13.3 Responsibility for Winding Up: Upon the dissolution of the Partnership, the General Partner, or the persons required or permitted by law to cant' out the winding up of the affairs of the Partnership, shall; A. Promptly notify all partners of such dissolution; B. Proceed to liquidation of the assets of the Partnership by converting such assets to cash insofar as deemed practicable by the General Partner or persons carrying out the winding up; C. Wind up the affairs of the Partnership; D. Prepare and file all instruments or documents required by law to be filed to reflect the dissolution of the Partnership; and, 22 E. Pay or provide for the payment of all liabilities and obligations and other assets of the Partnership as provided by law and the terms of this agreement. 13.4 Liquidation and Distribution on Dissolution: The proceeds of liquidation and other assets of the Partnership shall be applied and distributed in the following order of priority: A. To the payment of debts and liabilities of the Partnership and the expenses of liquidation. B. To the Limited Partner and the General Partner for their share of the profits as described in Paragraphs 7.9,7.10,7.11. 13.5 Filing Certificate of Dissolution: Upon dissolution of the Partnership, the Partnership shall execute and file in the Office of the Secretary of State of California a Certificate of Dissolution. If dissolution occurs after a sole General Partner ceases to be a General Partner, the Limited Partners conducting the winding up of the Partnership's affairs shall file the Certificate of Dissolution. 13.6 Cancellation of Certificate of Limited Partnership: Upon completion of the winding up of the Partnership's affairs, the Partnership shall execute and file in the Office of the Secretary of the State of California a Certificate of Cancellation of the Certificate of Limited Partnership. If dissolution occurs after a sole General Partner ceases to be a General Partner, the Limited Partners conducting the winding up of the Partnership's affairs shall file the Certificate of cancellation. ARTICLE XIV MISCELLANEOUS 14.1 Limited Partnership Certificate: Upon formation, the Partnership shall: A. Cause to be filed with the Secretary of State, a Certificate of Limited Partnership as required by the California Corporations Code; and B. Execute a Fictitious Business Name Statement and cause it to be filed and published as required by the California Business and Professions Code. 23 14.2 Power of Attorney: Each Limited Partner irrevocable constitutes and appoints the General Partner as his attorney -in -fact, in his name, place, and stead, to make, execute, acknowledge, and file any of the following documents: A. The original and any modifications or amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership and any other instrument that may be required to be recorded or filed by the Partnership; B. All documents that may be required to effectuate the dissolution and termination of the Partnership; and, C. A Fictitious Business Name Statement. It is expressly understood and agreed by each Limited Partner that the granting of this power of attorney is coupled with an interest and shall survive the delivery of an assignment of the Limited Partnership interest. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of the Certificate of Limited Partnership and this Limited Partnership Agreement or any amendments thereto, or between this Limited Partnership Agreement and any document executed, acknowledged, sworn to, or filed by a General Partner under this power of attorney, the Limited Partnership Agreement and its amendments shall govern. 14.3 Amendments: This agreement may be amended at any time and from tome to time, but any amendment must be in writing and signed by each person who is then a partner. 14.4 Notices: Any written notice to any of the partners required or permitted under this agreement shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally on the party to whom notice is to be given, or on the third day after mailing if mailed to the party to whom notice is to be given, by fast class mail or air mail, certified, postage prepaid, and addressed to the General Partner, Benamel Development, and to the Limited Partners, or their designated representatives, specified by a written notice, given to the sender by the addressee under this provision. Notice to the Partnership shall be similarly given, and addressed to it at its principal place of business. 14.5 Counterparts: This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and each such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original instrument. 24 t• 14.6 Successors: This agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind the successors, assigns, heirs, executors, and administrators of the parties. 14.7 Governing Law: This agreement shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 14.8 Severability: If any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the rest of this agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired, or invalidated. 14.9 Entire Agreement: This instrument contains the entire agreement of the parties relating to the rights granted and obligations assumed in this instrument. Any oral representations or modifications concerning this instrument shall be of no force or effect unless contained in a subsequent written modification signed by the party to be charged. 14.10 Federal Income Tax Elections: Provided that all partners have agreed, if and when it may become of importance to a partner, the Partnership may, in the discretion of the Limited Partner, make any election provided in the Internal Revenue code or corresponding provisions of succeeding law and shall keep appropriate accounting records to reflect the application of the Section. 14.11 Captions for Convenience: The captions and headings in this agreement are for convenience only and shall not be considered in interpreting any provisions of this agreement. 14.12 Waiver of Right to Partition, Each of the parties hereto irrevocable waives„ during the term of the Partnership, any right that he may have to maintain any action for partition with respect to the Partnership property. 14.13 Numbering for Convenience: The numbering or order of paragraphs used in this agreement are used for administrative purposes only and do not constitute substantive matter to be considered in construing the terms of this agreement. `li 14.14 Gender: Wherever the content shall so require, all words herein in the male gender shall be deemed to include the female or neuter gender, all singular words shall include the plural, and all plural words shall include the singular. 14.15 Attorney's Fees: If any action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this agreement, or to sue for the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, costs, and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which he may be entitled. 14.16 Priority: No Limited Partner shall have any right or enjoy or be entitled to any priority or benefit over other Limited Partners of this agreement. 14.17 Representations of the Limited Partners: Each of the Limited Partners represents and warrants to the other partners that: A. They are competent and able to enter into this agreement as provided by state and federal law. B. They have no interests adverse to the Partnership. C. They are purchasing the property for their account, for investment, and not with the view to their future distribution. D. They are experienced in investing in speculative investments and know that there is a risk of loss of their investment in the Partnership. E. In making the decision whether or not to become a partner herein, they have been afforded the opportunity to seek and rely upon the advice of their own professional advisers; neither the General Partner nor any Limited Partner nor any of their agents have made any representations, warranties, or assurances with respect to the Partnership, the investment herein, the safety or the risks involved and/or the tax or economic consequences thereof except as set forth in writing herein or in the other documents delivered. Their real estate, tax and legal advisers, to the extent that they have requested the same, have received all information requested by them in connection with the Partnership and the Partnership property. F. They understand that the Internal Revenue Service may disallow some or all of the deductions to be claimed by the Partnership, and that any Federal Income Tax benefits which may be available to them 26 may be lost through adoption of new laws, amendments to existing laws or regulations or the interpretations of this contract. With respect to the tax and other legal aspects of this investment, they have not relied on any General Partner or Limited Partner, but on such outside real estate, tax, and legal advice as they have been chosen to I(MIKa Vf•7 G. Except as may be provided in other parts of this agreement, they are aware that the Partners in said Limited Partnership are presently, and may in the future be, engaged in businesses which are competitive with that of the Partnership, and they hereby waive and release any claims with respect thereto. H. They understand that this agreement contains certain restrictions on the transferability of their interest in the Partnership; there will be no public market for this interest; and, it may not be possible for them to readily liquidate their investment in the Partnership. I. They understand that the sale of Limited Partnership interests in the Partnership is intended to be a private offering, and that the same has not been authorized by either or any of the Real Estate Commissioner of California, the Corporations Commissioner of California, or the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor is there any intention to seek or obtain any permit, registration, qualification, listing report, or filing in connection with such sale, either state or federal. J. They acknowledge that all documents, records, and books pertaining to this investment that they desire to examine have been made available to them for such examination. 27 14.18 Execution of Documents: The parties hereto covenant and agree that they will execute such other and further instruments and documents as are or may become necessary or convenient to effectuate and carry out the purpose and intent of this agreement. ,�, IN ITN SS THEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement on this day of 2000. GENERAL PARTNER: RSF BEN Inc. John Silverwood. President Whose notice address is: 16885 West Be rt e, Suite 385 San Diem. 2 OHj SILVERWOO'li� 688 W. Bernardo Drive, an Lego. CA 92198 -07-00 28 07- © 0 Date EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. 1175446 -22 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL I: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY VEINS OR LODES, OF QUARTZ, OR OTHER ROCK, IN PLACE BEARING GOLD, SILVER, CINNABAR, LEAD, TIN, COPPER OR OTHER VALUABLE DEPOSITS WITHIN THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED AS KNOWN TO EXIST ON OR PRIOR TO MARCH 9, 1925. PARCEL 2: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, NORTH 88 °09'47" EAST, APPROXIMATELY 125.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 20.00 FOOT EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN PARCEL I IN DEED TO OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED MAY 3, 1961 AS FILE NO. 76608 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 3: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. PARCEL 4: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AND WITHIN LOT 16 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF RANCHO PAGE 6 ORDER NO. 1175446-22 LAS ENCINITAS, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, NNE 27, 1898, ALL BEING IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16 AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 6085, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 14, 1962, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 03 °57'39" EAST, 1029.04 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESIGNATED AS POINT "A "; THENCE SOUTH 86 °00'00" WEST, 149.53 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 6085 AND BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RETRACING NORTH 86 °00'00" EAST, 149.53 FEET TO SAID POINT "A" ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 86 °00'00" EAST, 130.41 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38 °17'20 ", A DISTANCE OF 132.70 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 47 °42'40" EAST, 408.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 051'20" A DISTANCE OF 139.12 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87 034'00" EAST 254.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 00620" A DISTANCE OF 210.36 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 63 027'40" EAST, 292.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 012'03" A DISTANCE OF 84.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87 039143" EAST, 640.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, NORTH 87 015'43" EAST, 1321.28 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5. SAID EASEMENT TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN THE CENTER LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AND TO TERMINATE EASTERLY IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5. PARCEL 5: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, OVER A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID 60.00 FOOT STRIP BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4. PAGE 7 i A; PARCEL & ORDER NO. 1175446 -22 AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THEREOF OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B ", PARCEL 2 OF DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1964 AS FILE NO. 19804 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LYING WITHIN THE NORTHERLY 30.00 FEET OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1185, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON DECEMBER 21, 1972 AS FILE NO. 340331 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. MAY 01, 2000 10:59 AM SP PAGE J L� EXHIBIT "B" TRACT NO. TPM9 8-242 OLIVENHAIN, CA. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT ADAMS RUN, L.P. CONTRIBUTIONS TO CAPITAL AS OF 12- 15-99: JOHN SILVERWOOD TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO CAPITAL 29 $79,500.00 $79,500.00 'At4 "EXHIBIT C" TRACT NO. TPM9 8-242 OLIVENHAIN, CA. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT ADAMS RUN, L.P. SEE PROFORMA SHEET Attached as Exhibit `c' 30 ho Vil07 /O 11:2n6 aj�n CJohn Hl air(ssoc 61S 276 -7806 r%�� s;� T0 AbA�S lAl L,� OP��h11 rL'C '✓ per E Fortuna Ranch Estates o Pro forma provides funds to acquire and develop four 2 -acre lots and build three estate homes Original: January 21, 1998 / in Olivenhi in. Conte cash is $643,000, Sllverwood is $115,500. Total Collateral la 3lofs. J5 to Revlvotl. Nwvmbe, 8, 2000 1 secure $74.418 advanced for Conte's lot by a first TD on his lot In a like amount. VILE' Finished Lot Cost (Net Land, Fees 6 Finance Costs) LAND - LOT COSTS t. 3 Raw Lots 1 Mltl at Ion Land Total Lot Costs INDIRECT FINISHED LOTS 3. Civil S Solis Englns0rs 4. Soils En91ne0ring 5. G. - 7. Total Indirect Finished Lot Costs 10. Architectural I Landscape Plans I Blue Pts. 11. Utility Deposits 12. Fees At Building Permit Water, Sewer, Fire 13. School Foes 4M 14, Building Permit Fee 16. Insurance - COC I Liability Q $6.00 per $1k 15. Real Estate Taxes 17. Legal, Accounting and Consultant 18 - 19. - 20. - 21. 5010* Collateral Expense - Coldwell 22. Retuning Advertising Expense - Caldwell 23. Fund Control 24. Superintendent 25. Oen.Colld: Tder /Utl IlTolt/Fnc /S*u rlty 26. Developer G&A Total lrid -rt LOT DEVELOPMENT I OFF TRACT COSTS 28 Slaking I Sods I Plnrrmg 29. Grading, Storm Dial,, Brow Ditch, Trails 30 Paving 31. Concrete 32. Sewer (public) and Water (private) 33. Utillbas Deposits and Trenching (no refun. 34. Privet* Oat* Entry 36. - 36.- Costs STICK BUILT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 38. Direct Building Cows (P SF 39. Landscape - 3 Homers 40. Fencing - 3 homes 41 42. Contingency - Built into line Items Total Direct Construction Costs LOAN RELATED COSTS 43. Loan Foo: 44. Additional Interest. ate (General Bank e) 45. Consl Int. Rae. 10% Raw 12 Mos 60% Dish 46. Blair 8 Assoc Fee @1 .0026 47. Loan Costs - Appraisal, Title, Escrow, Deco. Total Loan Related Costs CLOSING AND RELATED COSTS 40. - 49. Sales Commission 3 Closing Casts 50. - 51. Customer Service I Developer Warrant _ Total Closin5 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Average Home Value Premiums: Construction Loan To Value Aggregate Loan $148,836 FUNDS I FUNDS I AMOUNT Per Unit $108,600 $586,000 $586,000 $0 EO $57,000 $67,000 SO SO $160,760 � 5643,000 $843,000 1 $0 $0 $29,000 $6,000 $35,000 $10,000 $38,052 $11.695 Inc 12 2.50% $165,014 Inc. 3 6 4 $31,481 $28,080 $113.936 $82.25 Inc. 38 1.25% `I 571.500 JIIII $1 51,500 ,50 $24,000 Snverwood �Costs ,I 5115,500 $1,533,33: Inc. Abov1 57.95% $Z- 665.70( Cash Equity $756,500 $271.55 22.15% P - $116,000 571.500 $0 $44,600 $24,000 s0 s0 $24,000 $114,156 SO $0 $0 535,085 $0 SO $0 936,000 s0 $0 $o $27,600 $0 s0 $0 923,000 $0 so s0 5140 000 $71,600 $0 $68.500 540,000 s0 50 $40.000 $15,200 $0 s0 $15,200 $114,156 $0 $0 5114,156 535,085 $0 SO $3S.085 936,000 $0 $0 $0 $27,600 so so $27,600 923,000 SO $0 $0 $9,500 $0 $0 $9,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $u $o $466,342 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $5,500 $D s0 $5,500 $75,000 s0 $0 $75,000 $28,000 So so $28,000 $115,000 s0 So $115.000 $0 SO 50 $405,041 50 $0 5465 041 $1,393,315 $0 s0 SO $125,925 $0 $o $125,925 $112,320 so $0 $112,320 $28,297 $0 50 $28,297 936,000 $0 $0 $36,000 $129,800 $0 $0 $129,800 923,000 $0 $0 $23,000 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $466,342 $o SO 5466.342 $1,393,315 $44,000 So E1,349.J15 $30,000 SO $0 $30,000 $18,000 s0 $0 $18.000 $6.664 $n so so $15,100 $0 $0 $0 $1,441,316 $44 UOU $0 $1.397,315 533,321 so $0 533.321 $90,631 $0 $0 $90,831 $133,285 $o 50 $133,285 $6.664 $0 $0 $6,664 $15,100 so $0 $15400 $279,502 $0 $0 $279,602 $3,424,200 $768,600 so 52,685,700 3243.800 $4,500 Parcel 1 6025 sf $1,625,Oo0 Parcel 2 5,375 of $1,525,000 Parcel 4 6540 sf $1,460,000 s0 SO So $243,600 $0 SO $0 S4.5O0 Estimated Market Value Total Project Costs Add Back Utility Deposits Projected Pre-Tax Profits IrIA1.1 Equity Average SF Gross SF Total Homo So $0 so so ,665, 700 $4,500,000 $3,672,500 $16.200 $942,700 $758,500 57.94999% 5,647 0 16,940 1 D0 00 °/ -R "EXHIBIT D" \ TRACT NO. TPM98 -242 OLIVENHAIN, CA. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT ADAMS RUN, L.P. B1111 I IN/ Do 'U118111 17 $79.500.00 Repayment accounting on above accounts to follow as required 31 t �P.O ORDER NO. 1175446 -22 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 411 IVY STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 BOX 808, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92112 (619) 238 -1776 MAY 12, 1999 BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 270649 SAN DIEGO, CA 92198 ATTN: JOHN SILVERWOOD YOUR REF: FORTUNA RANCH ROAD OUR ORDER NO. 1175446 -22 OF IN RESPONSE TO THE HEREIN REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, THIS COMPANY HEREBY REPORTS THAT IT IS PREPARED TO ISSUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, A POLICY OR POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE DESCRIBING THE LAND AND THE ESTATE OR INTEREST THEREIN HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, INSURING AGAINST LOSS WHICH MAY BE SUSTAINED BY REASON OF ANY DEFECT, LIEN OR ENCUMBRANCE NOT SHOWN OR REFERRED TO AS OR NOT EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORMS. THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FROM THE COVERAGE OF SAID POLICY OR POLICIES ARE SET FORTH HEREIN. COPIES OF THE POLICY FORMS SHOULD BE READ. THEY ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS REPORT. PLEASE READ THE EXCEPTIONS SHOWN OR REFERRED TO BELOW AND THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS REPORT CAREFULLY. THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS ARE MEANT TO PROVIDE YOU WITH NOTICE OF MATTERS WHICH ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY AND SHOULD BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THIS PRELIMINARY REPORT IS NOT A WRITTEN REPRESENTATION AS TO THE CONDITION OF TITLE AND MAY NOT LIST ALL LIENS, DEFECTS, AND ENCUMBRANCES AFFECTING TITLE TO THE LAND. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. DATED AS OF MAY 6, 1999 AT 7:30 A.M. INE CARDIN -ALLEN - TITLE OFFICER RE D CT DIAL PHONE 231 -4664 FAX NO. 231 -4647 PAGE 1 I t ORDER NO. 1175446 -22 THE FORM OF POLICY TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REPORT IS: TO BE DETERMINED TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: COSMO C. CONTE D.B.A. CARDIFF PROPERTIES THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: u3mu.W0311 mru V*hwl� THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999 -2000, A LIEN, NOT YET PAYABLE. 2. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1998 -99, FIRST INSTALLMENT, DELINQUENT, SECOND INSTALLMENT, DELINQUENT. 3. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTES OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES: THE REQUIREMENT THAT THIS COMPANY BE FURNISHED WITH ALL SUPPLEMENTAL TAX BILLS, IF ANY, FROM THE OWNER OF THE HEREIN }C DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEFORE CLOSE OF ESCROW. J 4. AN EASEMENT FOR EITHER OR BOTH POLE LINES, UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 1955 IN BOOK 5919, PAGE 565 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTHERLY 12 FEET. PAGE 2 ORDER NO 1175446-22 SAID INSTRUMENT FURTHER RECITES: "IT IS UNDERSTOOD BY THE PARTIES HERETO THAT THE GRANTEE MAY PLACE, ERECT AND MAINTAIN ON THE LANDS OF THE GRANTOR ADJACENT TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED RIGHT OF WAY SUCH ANCHORAGE AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY GUY THE POWER POLE LINE ERECTED OVER SAID RIGHT OF WAY." REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 5. THE RIGHT, IF ANY, TO THE USE OF THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND FOR THE EXTRACTION AND /OR DEVELOPMENT OF MINERALS AS EXCEPTED AND /OR RESERVED BY THEODORE E. KOONS, ET UX IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 11, 1959 IN BOOK 7710, PAGE 351 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. P}� '6. /AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF pJ� OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED MAY 3, 1961 AS FILE NO. 76608 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. 7. AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED JANUARY 31,,1962 AS FILE NO. 18555 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. %/'8. AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD, PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1964 AS FILE NO. 19804 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND THE RIGHT OF OTHERS TO USE SAID EASEMENT AS CONVEYED OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. ,V9. AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD, UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS RESERVED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1971 AS FILE NO. 306534 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND THE RIGHT OF OTHERS TO USE SAID EASEMENT AS CONVEYED OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD. PAGE 3 f M THE ROUTE AFFECTS A J 0 `11 OVA 13 44 J 15 ORDER NO. 1175446 -22 OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 1974 AS FILE NO. 74- 272832 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN THE NORTHERLY 20 FEET OF PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. AN EASEMENT FOR EITHER OR BOTH POLE LINES, UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1977 AS FILE NO. 77- 472334 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE "SAN DIEGUITO REORGANIZATION ", AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 390249 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE "ENCINITAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT REORGANIZATION ", AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 30, 1987 AS FILE NO. 87- 659937 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN EASEMENT FOR A PIPELINE OR PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC AGENCY, RECORDED DECEMBER 8, 1988 AS FILE NO. 88- 630378 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT, RECORDED NOVEMBER 10, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994 - 0655276 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. PAGE 4 f [4]:L3� mlfel 1p bA-z-ii--lw*A 16. AN AGREEMENT REGARDING OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. 170, DATED JANUARY 19, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: THE OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT AND CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT. RECORDED: APRIL 24, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0171789 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 17. ANY EASEMENTS OR SERVITUDES APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS. AFFECTS: PARCELS 2, 3, 4, 5 AND 6. 1998 -1999 TAX INFORMATION: CODE AREA: PARCEL NO.: 1ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT: LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPT: 19073 264 - 451 -05 -00 $842.06 (DELINQUENT) $842.06 (DELINQUENT) $136,899 $-o- $-o- PAGE 5 • PENALTY $84.21 • PENALTY $94.21 1 `. t m LEGAL DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. 1175446 -22 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY VEINS OR LODES, OF QUARTZ, OR OTHER ROCK, IN PLACE BEARING GOLD, SILVER, CINNABAR, LEAD, TIN, COPPER OR OTHER VALUABLE DEPOSITS WITHIN THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED AS KNOWN TO EXIST ON OR PRIOR TO MARCH 9, 1925. PARCEL 2: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, NORTH 88 009'47" EAST, APPROXIMATELY 125.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 20.00 FOOT EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1 IN DEED TO OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED MAY 3, 1961 AS FILE NO. 76608 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 3: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. T:02/12/98 16:30:01 V: / / : : m 00 PAGE 6 ORDER NO. 1175446 -22 PARCEL 4: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AND WITHIN LOT 16 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1898, ALL BEING IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16 AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 6085, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 14, 1962, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 03 057'39" EAST, 1029.04 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESIGNATED AS POINT "A"; THENCE SOUTH 86000100" WEST, 149.53 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 6085 AND BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RETRACING NORTH 86000'00" EAST, 149.53 FEET TO SAID POINT "A" ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 86000'00" EAST, 130.41 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38017'2011, A DISTANCE OF 132.70 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 47042'4011 EAST, 408.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39051'20" A DISTANCE OF 139.12 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87034'00" EAST 254.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24006'20" A DISTANCE OF 210.36 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 63027'40" EAST, 292.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24012'0311 A DISTANCE OF 84.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87039'43" EAST, 640.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, NORTH 87015'4311 EAST, 1321.28 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5. SAID EASEMENT TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN THE CENTER LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AND TO TERMINATE EASTERLY IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5. PAGE 7 ORDER NO. 1175446 -22 PARCEL 5: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, OVER A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID 60.00 FOOT STRIP BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4. PARCEL 6: AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THEREOF OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "B ", PARCEL 2 OF DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1964 AS FILE NO. 19804 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LYING WITHIN THE NORTHERLY 30.00 FEET OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1185, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON DECEMBER 21, 1972 AS FILE NO. 340331 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 8 ..... • - - - 74 .. X01 ix a •. _-7.. < - : . 'TE S Td? m2Y T SAN DQDU OWI7 AiY19XS WP w 264 —.45 q5 SHT 2 OF 2 9: .+ SHT 1 �1T V 1 =- '200Fx - 9 'ti lr I ff PJ°F�lMCµ nM1:M1 NEU euvJ•nv a. /, rP Ysl nbe S 9 MIe•O'IP -N a•a.Se aI16• PMa6e5 .umas4nAUri 4oe PAR 2 JSr °SO1r'I /- tt dy IS 1 JJS.A _PMI691] iSO..> PAR 2 M13206 n.. it q 3 I ah, PAR QOF O ni PAR 20 21 OO �OCq 1002 AC 1� IS 2.10 AC 2 08 AC 10.05 AC 4NC 2.121 AC \ 2.32 AC I ae s M "I I (1Prr+ SPACE 0q �2a AeJ : 1st. rr ra.JA nR 4,4A AC + 2fo.a3 EST nr. r cr \ APPRO% LOC• H>42 V JJ�fa (ONE ~ / PAR 3 N�V 16 19 PAR I O CRE RODR = . _ 2.5E AC IT 2.32 AC ^ y! 249 u 2.32 AC �2 K° �� lyZ32 w 2• 451 PMAaa3 afi..a SHT 2 .g PMI I • .. .............. Y . JO f PMT904 G� LL-. SHT 1 ......... ..... ..... of .._.,,. -:-SE C 4 4 PM S DA J !. , _J+- pPN IL M32]a vtu t HOLLOW RD OPAP S e POI PAR 2 _ I w3 PAR I PAR 2 1 ❑ I] y - ^� 0 p O 6 O O 2.T] AC 2.1! AC SJTAP OP 4.73 AC f 244 AC 2.19 AC \ ii Iw'fa AA/ HOC r C OP Is, 3A as It o 3 u4 .Si I PAR 2 J PAR E - K PO 4 t >...• > - 6 PAR 3 PAR ] 5 2 2.ee AC °� 3.]J AC lQ e 3.32 AG 210 AC �LT \� -1 Aa 44e 2.30 AC 9 P rl N K 11 a2 0 9DY PMG394 PM7904 tS C. 91 'x t, -,.,.AS z PM327J I nat•13't•[ 51/4 CDR) rfc•r [AST) H 1 vnfa I/a _ 2ee•r Ifsl fe0'f >r- /r40i1 A. SI°S'31 "W 0.13 FORTUNA RANCH RO 6 I • OPEN SPACE ESMT 2a RECREATIONAL TRAIL ESMT IO MAP 13206 -CITY OF ENCINITAS TCT 92 -101 3 TIES WP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESMW RIP09$ DET. 10 LVAM a SEC 4- T 13 S- R 3 W- S_ I/ 2 OF SW 1/4 _ ASS E0 $04 t1E ACM10V OF TK AtA E W MMMD'I5 AAaOELS SHT 1 RO S 6142, 9293, 1410 0 - - AuT IV EART -!I" LOCAL SLWE -" CA E,ACfr, OAOAM'fIS 23 SHT. I u v '.r MW cna,,. ES"S .." N.T. 264 A. gi 23 Sri' 2 OF 2 e SHT. I s ss• v'.a- r....� i• i 264-23 ` SHT.2 OF X I'= 200' r� 7 O ».Y05 S27 O.P. ru AA htl f_CC I 36 tt�I m, 71 1065420[. SEC 5 — 713S —R3 W —POR. 5 1/2 ROS.2545,6085,9293, 10122 1 • 'p- —�D w^+Y of the lard rot be e You should Mcf rely m heraor.. for any fauRwte other than n n ,ie ntafion to the general 61ation cf the parcel or parcel depicted, RIO American Title ex sly dixlima any liability o /r alleged lost or damage which may rewh flnm relG•.ce umn this mao" c: Vc r�4. Or Y u za � DO C°.l w z 0 J ISNSSO 3 Yu IOOR 264 P1 j M S T-I YarstP rm l a V V rnrna.• .., , e` 3- LOiS 1�Ka.a #..S Td q°°e 2 �,i1 °isTS° e SHT. I 264 -23 SHT.I OF 2,.. i 1" =200• 6'24-83 1�isda�r T.)� bf+aen ufA" IAA erM•YiYr rM p.r�..r leer's / M y"d r.pra e.o:_r.a, ww A�dr AY .w.Yr drNM xry IYra1 v Yr.r.e w a a..r°l urrw.q MAP 848 -RHO LAS ENCINITAS -POR LOT 16 SEC 5- T13S- R3W- POR.SIf2 ROS. 2545, 6085, 9092 MEB=a:® m:fV m=l ®*all"mmm E =mrm mm"lo fl iMEiEE E= -== --.- a:= -�_:: . :_ - - - 1�isda�r T.)� bf+aen ufA" IAA erM•YiYr rM p.r�..r leer's / M y"d r.pra e.o:_r.a, ww A�dr AY .w.Yr drNM xry IYra1 v Yr.r.e w a a..r°l urrw.q MAP 848 -RHO LAS ENCINITAS -POR LOT 16 SEC 5- T13S- R3W- POR.SIf2 ROS. 2545, 6085, 9092 RECORDING REOUESTE Tr-.r Co. .H0 WHEN AE DED Ms. THIS DEED AND TM STATEIAENTS TO F- 7 NF BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT INC. oonESa 200 E. WASHINGTON AVE #204 YY, LESCONDIDO, CA 92026 J Title Order No. 1 l? 1 "14.6 - ZL- r,scrmv No. 9814-TL ,�ssessor'sParcclNo. 264- 451 -050 Onte FEBRUARY 10, 1998 t' i 221 80C # 1998-0488351 Aug 04. 1-998 2:3 Pt✓i OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GRElI1RY J. SNITN, COUNTY RECORDER FEES: 750225 00: AFNF SPACE ABOVE TH' IIIIIIII jjM j IIIIIIIIIIIIjIIIj III jjI GRANT DEED The undersigned declares that the'documentary transfer tax is $701.25 and is computed on the full value of the interest or property conveyed. The property is located in the city of ENCINITAS. FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, ROY K. OKITA and JUNKO OKITA, HUSBAND AND WIFE and KATSUHIRO MIYAMOTO and MICHIKO MIYAMOTO, HUSBAND AND WIFE ,to hereby GRANT to Cosmo C. Conte d.b.a. Lhe following described real property in the C of SAN DIEGO, State of California: PARCEL l: F4D EN CINIT, The Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Section 4, 'Township 13 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Base Meridian, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attched and made a part hereof. 'ROY Tr I i/I fi) ;t_ n wII•• I' STATE OF CALIFORNIAC�S�Ie� }55. COUNTY OF f( 11 In r before me, a Notary Public in and for said State'personp�,enred W115Uk�iDMI1�M10 lUsrdMICFMWM[YAb1O O,p%wn*haanmme(a proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to he the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and icxnowleoged to me that they executed the same In their authorized •apacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity on behalf of which the pereone acted, ,xoctned the instrument. NITNESS my hand and Dfficiai Beal. Signanue MAIL TAX STATEMENTS ill County Quarter I' and hereto ABOVE cHRIS BOLLIER comm. k"03K46 W AN09M COUNTY w oa...Iflpew Asa +� ,ass Jroer EXP- 0022 - 00001072 Description: 98.488357 Page 1 of 5 Comment' 33S1 270A REV. 7A4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Q P A a✓GG% �n X22 } S.S. 9a° before me, �sT-4,1 0 - Id ✓ r/ a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally _ooeared & Y /�. DK I -rd —1-- .70 AJ K O DIG /T A ersonatly known to me (or proved to me on .na oasis of satisfactory evidence) to be ne person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the withiW's rument and acknowledged tome t �?elSLte ey )executed the same in heir authorize capacity(ies), and that by ' heir Innature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or ne entity upon behalf of which the person(s) ,,;ted, executed the instrument. WITNES hand and official seal. Signature Q 160 Legal 12.960 FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP Jos" Q. v vrt cartar+m• t Cosset Noraracw— cauxne crWW car" WCar bVIINU25.2010 This form is furnished by Chicago Title Company oor EXP- 0022 - 00001072 Description: 98.488357 Page 2 of 5 Comment: 223 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. 1175446 -22 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ('COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO RASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. CXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY VEINS OR LODES, OF QUARTZ, OR OTHER ROCK, IN PLACE BEARING GOLD, SILVER, CINNABAR, LEAD, TIN, COPPER OR OTHER VALUABLE DEPOSITS WITHIN THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN )ISCOVERED AS KNOWN TO EXIST ON OR PRIOR TO MARCH 9. 1925. I A ICEL 2: !\' EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 -OUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, NORTH 88 °09'47" EAST, APPROXIMATELY 125.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 20.00 FOOT EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1 IN DEED TO OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED MAY 3, 1961 AS FILE NO. 76606 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 3: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO. TO BE USED 114 COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS 71E EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST -QUARTER ()F SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. 7 02/12/99 16:30 al V / / ,ti, 1" PAGE 6 EXP -0022- 00001072 Description: 98.488357 Page 3 of 5 Comment., �,..- 224 �. ORDER NO. 1175446-22 PARCEL 4: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS A TRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP '13 .'OUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AND -WITHIN LOT OF THE SUBDIVISION OF RANCHO T.Aq RNCTNTTAS, ACCORDTNG TO MAP THEREOF NO. 348, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ,_IEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1898, ALL BEING IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, . 'TATS OF CALIFORNIA, AND THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP BEING DESCRIBED ;S FOLLOWS: �!OMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 16 AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP 140. 6085, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ;AN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 14, 1962, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 03 057'39" FAST, 1029.04 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESIGNATED AS POINT "A "; THENCE SOUTH 86 000'00" WEST, 149.53 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. x,085 AND BEING THE TRUE, POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RETRACING NORTH 86 000'00" EAST, 149.53 FEET TO SAID POINT "A" ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 86 000'00" EAST, 130.41 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38 °17'20 ", A DISTANCE OF 132.70 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 47 042'40" EAST, 408.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 200.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 051'20" A DISTANCE OF 139.12 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87 034'00" EAST 254.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 500.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24006'20" A DISTANCE OF 210.36 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO t "URVE NORTH 63 027'40° EAST, 292.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TAId.- -E @!T :?00.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 012'03" A DISTANCE OF 84.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF =AID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 87 039'43" EAST, 640.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER „-,NORTH 87 °15'43” EAST, 1321.28 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5. SAID EASEMENT TO TERMINATE WESTERLY IN THE CENTER LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 554 AND TO TERMINATE EASTERLY IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 5. PAGE 7 EXP -0022- 00001072 Description- Page 4 of 5 Comment. ORDER NO. 1175446 -22 PARCEL E: AD7 EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, OVER A STRIP OF LAND 60.00 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN THE SOLrpHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1; SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, .STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID 60.00 FOOT STRIP BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4. PAGE B Mder EXP- 0022 - 00001072 Description: 98.488357 Page 5 of 5 Comment: DOC 4 1994-0655276 10 -NOV -1994 10a1S AM ' q95 OFFICIAL RECOM SAM DIE60 COONIY RKCORDEf'S MICE Recording Rsqueated bye )� Si11iM1 F fEf0A0(R 0.00 Cardiff Ranitation Dletriat ) When Recorded, Mail Cos ) District En !near ) Cardiff saltation District ) 509 south Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92021 ) ror the benefit e; the District )SPACE ABOVE TOR RECORDERS IS DBE ONLY Assessor's Parcel No. L64-070. 75 Project Y.O. Vol DCS183 Roy K. Oklta and Junky Oklta and KaLUShI y 1dWannta and Mlchiko Atlyamnta 1LI hereinafter designated arantar(e), dvner(s) of the hereinafter described lands, for a valuale oensidaration, does) hereby GRANT and CONVEY to the Cardiff :saltation District herein designated Grantee, a perpetual oYdlusivs oasaaant and right -of -say upon, through, under, over and anwe the hersinarter described real property for the installation, construction, operation, saintettsnce, repair, replaossent, and resonstruation or saw= pipe Lin" andler mains, umtholse, sever lateral pips lines, and all structures lnaldantal thersta, together with the perpetual right to _ remove buildings, fences, structures, tress, bushes, undergrowth, flowers, and any other obstructions Interfering with the use of amid easement and right-of-way by Grantee, its suac"acrs or assigns and In addition thereto, to rase" soil and other satarials within said right-of-way and to use the sass In such asnnar and at such locations as said Grantee my data proper, needful or neoasaesy in the construction, reconstruction and maintenance of said ewer lines or structures incidental thereto. TO have and to bold said ssaamant and right -of way unto itself Ind unto Its successors and assigns forever, together with the right to d convey said eaasstant, or Uq portion of Bald casement, to other 3 public agsnaias. tf /04 /cav2- 2B1vp9 (0- 1B-g1(1) J • r The real property referred to herein and made subject to eeid496 easesent and right-at-way by this grant is situated in the city of anoinitae, County of San Diego, State of California, and is partiaularly described as follaven one Yubiblt "a" and Xubibit "e" attached hereto and made a part by haroot by this retwonce. The Oranora say, at their own risk, use the surface of the above described real property in a saner that will not interfere With or be detrimental to use at said sasant and right -of vsy by Created, its suaoassers and assign, provided no tress he sll be planted or grown thereon and the entire area encumbered by the sever easement shall be graded flat and unobetruated at all tines, unless suthorised by the Grantee in writing. The Grantors hereby covenant and agree for themselves, their heirs, successors and aSsigns, that than shall not be constructed or maintained upon the above described real property or within said easement and riOat -et -way, any buildings or struatures of Any nature or kind that will interfere with the use of said easmeent and right -otway unions autboried by said Grantee, its sucaswors or one gm, or that will interfere vith the ingress ar agrees along said &assmsst by said Grantee, its suceesaote or assigns. When authorised by the arantes, gates will be permitted as long as said gates rasafn unlocked, or, it looked, then Orontes shall be provideG with a key at all tames. fn addition, Grantors, their successore or eaeigns, will be responsible for all eriatiag improvements within the mover easement and Grantor will not be held liable for any dasagon, thereto. The Grantee hereby covenants and agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, not to prevent the grantors, their sua "a" or assigner from crossing ever said real property and &grass that the Granters. their heirs, successors and assigns say enjoy the continued u e of the surface of said real property herein described, subject to the caedltions above stated/ end the arantea hereby aavenante and egress that attar the instillation of any pips line in any aroavation made by it in the above desaribsd easement and eight- of-way arenas will baaktlll any such excavation made by It so as to fill said excavation ea nearly as prseticable to the level of the eurrounding ground, ens will replace any oiled, asphalt or concrete surface with ilk& material. tf /04lccv2- 95lwp5 1 gmm OF amporom I& oouanas ••��•�� f 497 On (1c�r ks NO tan ivwldn__n�u rt b""Imd*car wr.�ar/. prprlp disc rwlb Wr��fmWbtl+rVwwevrrl�+lew TMIWIMr/ww/M�„NWIr�Ci Mnau.e • W tl.y 4 a rr YnYUOoffi a� al 0" a. n.+wru .min. V*--d va w wrtaese ny wb lie ='&'v= = owime I'mm"m "CIJ laver erg FTo 1 498 6xecotad this 197-y day of .iei v Owm BY (eignatur* of OMNI1 must be nctarifed. Attach the apprdprlats ealrnovle"gsmant. ]. This is to certify that the intaast in real property conveyed by the foregoing Head or grant to the a political corporation and /or govanuntal agenoy is her accepted on behalf of its Hoard, pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution or said Hoard adopt" on March 20, 1979, and Grant** Consents to the recordation therser by its duly authorised ofticer. nateds 110 -Zir -9Y Olydiff Sanitation tff04 /COV2- 251Vp9 (1- 18 -91 /lj . �•.: Ja'. f£ �`' Y�' y'�.a,4.ggAbv}�•fV�'N "1�ciw.y.. � . 1` .� ... ._. 499 EXMBf W LEAALCOMMON FOR PUBLIC isFlEA WEIUNT J.1f. Was June A 1841 An atl+rnent for POW O Mr P40m ckw. t110r, ahV and Kt M 0m Wow d me salnllaea quarorat fM S*Ugnean 4th d tlM Smftmd *ww Of SWOM 4. ToMMAIp 13 Boudt. RVW 9 WIML Eon Bwr&d q Mark n Sr County of Ban DWM a" d aflbrMA scaadrp b UnIM Stacy Gaam sM ralq maa penkuledydaseaasdas tdta.K 6eOwdnp 41100 SotdhwW rsmr of 1M SwAhwW quay of ft SKOMM1tg� of Ow amnimm oua of Section 1, Township 13 S". RanpM B War. Sea Urnoram m~; umwt . 1. Noat l0oww Weal %00 Fen to A loch whkh Is fmaBd wM and distant 10.W im Deemed ai tight sm" mm of sad eaeaar BnK smisa poraBd to "Id aac , One iL Nam Waba'Br Fan 50133Feat a NWM 5AW4V E04 11 &18FMt 4. Nwm s e(1 ar East 101.44 Fiat D. SOUM 1°26'40' Caw $BM FMC a Sane gglwsr wars 7670 Fast 7. South 68°66'46' won IOL04 FMl � a scum Bro66�Bi!' nfaa 681.6a Fwt Oonmu BI all a102 square faaL more orIm � aao Mrsuut a m s pnlrnon "Emaly Wu d aw sauPnaal tBtdlw of dW ONA MM amen or se abt&wad 4uww d am Sacllon 4 Brame daq aN0 ftoodytine tltatt. UW= to a Pam on ar srwly saneen one at sdd sacsn 4 mates aM0 odd soctim WN mtb6POINTOFSMNNrN(L . eli •a;a«c� e Sao Na'04e'f bt94' 0 12 I i W zr 0 2 i i i N 4 S5,c er .-r)1-30 . ri3w fuce�'.mo' S.S.M. NIflotor E 1f. 79' Nt9- ar•n•d .44' RlEt /C iFWER EACfMEV! /0/ 4&vm0 m G Pfaff 0"lr4r," ogrR�cc -T Nlev�•srf � � Ud.Je• �QRlUAIA $ e t0' I Rdmw ae7•s'rr -. Nton• � FrretGd• /YIRASD d0A/'r Iltle!!C BnarV [447. 1CR 9w Na. 19464 raeo I• !1•04. laDNa go•/jP 01 I 0) v Z a 0 LtOWM08 m CMAW o: can fpa o' WC - x a � P"" ' - i n� D, a •u I RECORDING REQUESTED BY ,u ANO WME Y IfECOROEO MAq 10 NA^E OLIVENIIAIN MUNICIPAL WATRR STREET DISTRICT AODRe ss 1966 Olivenhain Road Encinitas <.IT California 92079 STATE ZIP 1 0710 88- 630378 r— hrcnRnm 1vDS I Cr :'...I I.,_„! CUn .1Y. 6A, 1 1988OU; ';AM8:06 VERA L. LYU] CQUKIY RECORDER 1 usr kG FEE Thr..porr fer R,•r.rder•...• I 10 Or \o. 6006076 rel _ NO OOWnENTARY TAAnsrEK TAX KtI FEE GRANT OF' EASEMENT RDY K. OKI TA and JUNKO 0 K TA, husband and wile, and KATSU!l IRO KIYAAOTO and ......................................................... ............................... I....................... •• MI CNIKO MI YAMOTO, husband and wife ................................................................................. ............................... Ihvrrrnarmr ^GWTON hrrrby ir.ntz to. Ol twenhai.n .. Municipal water District, a public agency .................................. ......................... . . . . .. ............................................................................................. ............................... IherernoRer ­GRAN TEF••I, t. wrce..nra, ur ea..,, ,'he follneTnr dr.cnhed re.emei' for n 119M of a.r.. 70.00••• feet to eud'h, t-. upnu, o.rr. under .d woo.. !he I.nd. dr.cnbed haler, w em rr ...true', .rrna.wct. replace, nD•�q maa.tarrr, and me a otprbnr o: pipehnem for any and NI purpn.e.. to.ethrr with 6,cb Or'urr, and .DDVnenaar... m,Iudut , hit' Rnt 11milyd m. farJnle. for paw, n,u..mn...a wd rormeu rR4an putio,, ui w.n Invmnnc and .1...u.. , upon, .TOOK. over and,ndrr he Orh' of avy dearn6ad WIN .. CRAKTFE way nor a, hereARer de4rmmr.a n. .ale durb4ea .v'baot any .,Wmon.l comDrn+RUOn 'hnefor. .,other r.'h the ndhl of lnsreoa and ep.n. frvn'br .a.em.Rf by . p.cti.a! rovtr or rout.•l m, up.. o.er. ra .rfo,. Nr land de.rOhed brlor, toR•Nn rnA'he r.Rht w u.c 'hit r•a.e..' for TO CRANTFC'1 nDh. or wn, uwawd m .d,n...I I.nd>..nbwal u, + add ulanal conpennandn N.rnfw. ""he land 'hu maemaa' '..Ava Lld m'he c•ewn of .San Diego .. , Sao of rabfonra, .nd a man pnmc.lnrly dcarnhrd .. rolloa., m r,l . •.- The Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 4, Township 17 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the United States Government Survey. 0 of .1 0711 Said .......I of 1,11=1 or w•v In the .don•a.rd land. I, yerurvlm ly dr.erihed 1,R murw SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. GRANTOR• it, hnn..ureenorr, .m ... I"., .hell Inn em I1 m eunnleu,, .r wrind I„ h. a erlyd ur ..m.trvr lee, anv buddme..,nrtere a 1my,wem.•m.11, ,..r.., and -r mr1 M.A,.D ..f the ra.rn .. .• .bolt r:N ART)1,t. .�. her., rw� r..• r, m .nnm R,'lend any lh,c ar In•,a .1 plhm an)' other vrg, ad1.•n u. nm., bm d.R .n &!It ally 1:111" .n .. 111 •...1,v pees 1,•e of Ihr rnersoem, GRMTEE easy. I, A. aele d ... ml... n,l, mn,ntmn. ,.r e.e R.I.. In all fenee..b, 1 ....n... m Im.•, r1,,., nwy ,.a,. of III . ..... e ril. Gk ANTEE 0.11 nl.o be ,null. d w mw. cur.." clew, nnnv u1 kr...... bv.k. 1,r -alnn 1. p -hnion ur noes haw one 1, I...., GRANTEE delerinlnr. m p..uh dee."l" .,.heat any nMn mnnl r,.mpe n,ae.D. 61UNTEE .hall be rnolled to p.d,Uan, ..1,,n. loam venlun. or .hem .11 or nnr ponlnn of Tau rn.em.•al wah any ether Public Yrncy a uld n, ududln s. but not hm,ted I.. ant a,eoey .apply.,, n'utrr ur Rene, u,ev,e.ry " fnrll:br. I. thv pubic. DR GHANTEF. nay detemtme in its Role ducrel.on w,lb..t pay,./ any addd,nn.l r-am ... I,.. to (:IIANTOK- GRANMIP. hen., .veer..,... a •..,11,.. IAr.e for. GRAKWH R(res. Nat no Mlwr raaemrat or e.11n e.t. shall W pent" on, ande,, v..,, Ili,, e.R,ment wuhoul nhwn.n, the 1111. .11111. Con•eet III GRANTEE easy .1 .1 time We.... It. use of the r .e a„m1, ehuee the I.e... . of','Aclie. a aNer Nrlhnre ..16.1, the I.nnda,.e. of the e..ra,rnl rllht of W.I. er mad.ry th..1.. ar .-MILD, P,pelmaa u. n,hre .mpeVlylarnl. a II m.1 deten mme m IIV ..1. duc,ell. &Da1 ome u Date wnhoul Dann, 1,y . efit. .l e,npen.ma. 1. GRANTOR n GRANTOH'♦ heir., or ...,m,.. pro,,ded GRANTEE doe. not e.pud Is use or the I •semen. beYOnd 0, e..emeel houndann it,- .eeil.ed w1,... 11 a sbo wdo,.I.d ud aM.d bd the Palle. that the GR.CNTOR and the GRRNTOR'a h ..... ..m�. •.va, 1,r .sues, eh.11 art Dimes,. a, decease or perms W M mer....d er dreres.ed the euati1,r armed ,•) ... Ilan.,F div.lwvr Jenrn b..l .......l duch ..Lies .1 the um. tbi,, d,cuowv r. --led ..dw., obmmm, the prior .noes rn,uent of the GRATTF,E. In be "1,.1 or s y depute mvole m, thi. AR,..n.nt, wh.th.1 err u, LoR.tm1, a cmmeneed, 01 If My pLDruu.n prV- e.du6 rdRmonuw sMae.dlnl or h.S.tlon In law or In rVUUy. Including •n aflsn roe d.cbmwn rehrf. Ia btonght In enforee se mterye•t the ',1,1,,1,1 at pe,furteun of the v enG the prL- nRd., y.A, .hell W eanlled to an • and of ell •uomeye fees and the core .1 the nroetedml, wh,eh .hallrb. dnrrmmed by the eauet .r be preudm, office, hRVm, a.. 9mmty. Mae lht. datrrmmnen. GILI rap ne so IF war,.11 end re ear a mu Nat GR. TOR hoe the '-err m ,env II.. rue nenl .. nlriaa.nee.r,In rte urlY. Jn UNItirss FlUtprol, IN GIRM-IOR has e.ecated Ih,a E..eenew th n.. ------------ d.� of.- .-- .:..:. {:...... 11..:.... ERe C.w.. N. prr.enee of f1Ya4. RIWY. R /M'N,. 6006076 DRAWN R1 CHECKED BY ACCT ND SD -001- 281 -09 /th DATE September 11, 1987 1,e, 11- ..•s1,• .,(.Kl.. i�. , ... ...«. ..........._ ................... I, 1 1 1 � 7112 [•T NO. HMQo/aa TO IY /RCA I[_a•1 (Individual) TICOR TITLE INSURANCE STATE: OI' CALIPOR-l1A COUNTY OF Ora n¢e u U. November 511987 i saki S(ur. pentmally append # # # R R R a fort mr, -hr ulyeniETled, a Nanry Public in and for / / +r R # Y. i ♦ # # R • / # -)YnkO Ok. [a# • ## / f k # R # • 4 # # 1�— prnonsll) lmrwn co me m 1h, on 'ho basil u(wllyf-clAr) rvidrncc ro be G thr pam.�n nfimq Rams is xvl hm insvu " .,he mrnl anJ arluorlydpcd rht she rurrd 'til umr. eae- N'IT?'osN m land anJ ofhgal fm 1. bq A.., / !1/ i7-, OMMOE Ct�W SIRna le ` / rn ] YY tales [m. r+9 l ly CaT No IVYnpal TO ndRcAm NI (Ind..Jwll E -I'ATI OF. G \I.IPOR.%,A N col ''I'v Oh orange on November Sr 1987 r clT h ana fa off InlRrial <al) 0 TI =OR TITLE INSURANCE saal Sluu, pm.nallya — brforc me, the undemarled a Nonry ¢ubhr in and for ofr'arrd k # t # # R f a • a� a 11 [ #4 # # t / f . pr nvmllr known n me ur pn.cr.l lu mr on the bun "MU, wry code., m be IIIr pCIM1n� \t'1111Y naAn' ]U65 U [k( awm n inrvmrm :nA arknamlydRrd Iha rar r ctrl W". unrc. N'll `aF?15 r� -hanJ anJ ..1 heal jnl.7 -� / ; f S IFnRIb[r I- � ' �.\A OMNOE GOIIN ry i �' MCartn [a9. nle s �n (Th., Nc• Iw oWcW r.1 , , f 0713 CaT. Ma hNOae'a1 Toteaecwu -act 0TICOR TITLE INSURANCE (lndlvnlual) m.\ ry 11M (ALIMUNIA rri11N'ry ov AitfAwJCE } 6. 1 (ts led ✓ Or/. /V" before me me wrdrngn.d, r Nrnw Vabli< in and For slid %rate. peru•,ully cppt and _ _ VA/YOTIi .I . per.unJly knuwn to nr o. r--- - - - - -- i/ petted ,e me an the bass of utnfaetury e4doee <u br i the WMM=-,.Vww name /.f W.Knk.l t� the 1 .vnllm In.trunrnt and aei,noArdlted ehm _AC ... 9 0 ICIA 6"L .vrcJ rM unr VNowy h1 c r infnal wou,y rude UNi If dFNt01 l:UJKir // f•p 4ar it 1"l 4.µm1urr r- i ! ,TN.... la, olh,W .,.0W rai GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT Now ,lrry +uNlr /�..nrrA•H ir.. +/-.: r..YX. %K.TY.'•1 .41N /✓ �r�,y.ri r4WV MMiYINI .E••.r /_Mrr._�1r •' _.� 'I/ v stab of f/AL on lnta dna If day of NO�t%P1,�G A'fa �$). aelore me, county of reAA,lC �lCA7/9 Nt_`.GSAaN i i theund&%WOUN.NUry Pubiw.pwr llymWied KA°ISUH)Pa 111Y1'M,6Te' pn,tunaltyknown to ma ® Io e I hedtomaah homenrma ealslarlot1 1Mrmn to he lee Versontslwhsu nntlslq 1 41 w th In mot r um k? and aOnnla ed th]t tft WnNF 5 nd antlullmud L., Notary's 6,dnatwe \ x suascnaad to the auscu lad d This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the decd or grant dated Nove*er S. 1987 frvn Roy K. Okita and Bunko Okita, husband annwwif% and Katsuhiro IAigMtq_ pd 4'chik lyamoto hus�a 0 wife to�ie �Iwnhain Nutci 1 Water District, a i lEal corporation and /or governaental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned offloer or agent on behalf of the Board of Directors puretuurt to autturity conferred by Resolution of the Olive "in Municipal Water DiatricL adopted on April 6, 1 951, and the grantee's consent to r rdation thereof by its duly authorized offl.cor. Bated November 28. 1988�I / retary Y f i u u w. d f 0714 EXHIBIT 'A' All that portion of the Southerly 30.00 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 4 lying Easterly of the Southeasterly line of that certain 20,00 foot wide strip of land described in Parcel 1 in Decd to the Oliyenhain Municipal water District, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of said San Diego County May 1, 1961, as File /page No. 76608 of official Records. EXCEPTING from the aboeo 30.00 foot wide strip of land, that portion thereof rnriudod within that certain 20,00 foot wide strip of land described in Deed to the olivenhain Municipal water District, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of said San Diego County January 11, 1962 as Fi1a /Page rte, 18555 of Official Records. N a c � r�s� v4o,�tir 20 N',� : _ Wy / c PAR. �� 4 ROAD ESMT, i /� / ROAD SE %¢ OFSW%4oFSW14 Rona) .SECT /ON4,T.135.,R -3W. 1 1 �P�L1JP1E � v EA EMENT' 6594 N PAR 3 nA �EfU'a NNa fSML I l /.f / /G7,� /BSJ7aR. PROJECT: EXTENSION NO. 145 REFERENCES VALVE MAP f -4 Lo, NO_ / PLAT OP EASEMENTS REOUIREO EV THE OLIVENNAIN MUNICIPAL WATER OISTRiCT ACCT. No- SO- 00 /•zb / -a9 R/W NO- 6006076 TAX PAR. 764-030.35 EASE MAP 3 GATE SEPZ II, 19 B7 BaLAV am • CaJcicv T 1.3 SCALE /'- /o! r j �q_'1'7;d3;f4 i t% . (h ;4 r6,tN fJ.E ^7ctt ' ;aa�.,•ra tax �ot:t AGV I; 8 ;3 " y,N DIEGO (.At utctcrc c I .M 11 1 t, ..►.Lei. , MAIL TO r . IILF SAN DIEGO G4S & ELECTRIC CO. 0 0. BOX 1 51 t_`- W4 DIEGO, CALIPGhtaA. ?2112 - G AT7N, OF 1. C. KENNEDY _ _ __ _SR ) E nncve !'OR RECORDF.A' S csE- Rlfali OF WAY Roy _F OKITA, ".IIINKq j_PAa_TA¢Esill C- A1f6yANAGI SETSUKO_IAI(AYANAGIt_KATSUNItiO MIYA:10T0 and M NIKO MIYAMOT0 hereinafter called "Grantor ". for valuable rnnsfJeraLiun grant(s) to San Diego Gas a F.lactrl: Company, a corpora[Ion• hereinafter called "Grantee ". an easement and right of way upon- over, un.cr land across the lands hereinafter decries , to erect, construct, reconstruct, replace, repair• maintain and use, s pufcs with wires suspended thereon and all necessary and proper guys, anchorage• r ruasarms, braces and other fixtures for use In conncctien therewith, for the transnission and distribution of ELECIRI(!TY for all purposes for which it may be used, at such locations .and - levationx upon, along and over the hereinafter described casement and riKrtt of way :.a Crant_e may now or hereafter deem convenient and necessary at tiny time and from time to time, together with the right of ingress thereto and wires, thedefroa, to and along said line, over and across brantor's land situated in the County of _ San Qi ao Seat.. of California, and m•trc particularly described aE follows: That portion of the Southwest Quarter of she Southwest �uat ter of Section. 4, Township 13 South, Range 3 'nest, San Bernardino Meridian, described in a Deed recorded November 8, 1976 at Recorder's File /page No. 76- 371872 of Official Records of said County of San Diego. The sald easement and right of way in the aforesaid !ends shall be 12.00 Mt in width, being 6.00 feet measured ,JAN 10 P. mten OF •O �t .G I)m" "i at right angles, On each side of the fallowing described center lir. Commencing at the Vortnwest LCo6ner Filea NOel 3 of Parcel Map "10. 4645, filed F3ril 16, Record,, of said thence along the Northerly line of said 76- 114292 in the office of the County County of San Diego; East, 3.00 feet; Bence 1 °aving Parcel 3 ', 88 09, S4' " 1 40" East, 3.00 fee' to the s3:.d Northerly line South 01 25 _ thenue0fromOSaidGTRUEN PO1NTtOp EEGIti 7INGncon[inuingPsouthed, 01' 25' 40' East, 602.45 feet. F.LSO: That certain stcip of land 4.00 feet in width, being 2.00 feet on each :aide of the foilowing described center line: thence 3eginning at said TRUE POICIT OF BEGIVI•IMG; South 88' e9' 54" icst, 25.00 feet. -2- 1'y i 1f w w L. J ',rf I {iii Grantor grants to Grantee the right to erezt and maintoin on thz abr":e >, ril•ed lands �f the Grantor nd lauent to sold easement and right of way stteh ,u, -!; •rnge .d any t[ae ann from tine to time to properly tiny A" may be nesssan• •win Ilnv of poles. Grantor sl.�tll not cro:t, Pl Rie or coos[ rucc, nor permit to be everted, placv,l or constructed, unv building or ocher s[ruc[urr: Plant any tree; drip! :•r dig any 'poll, - thin the limits of Hai,! easement and right of way. Grantee shall have the right, but not the duty, to trim or remove trees and brusi along or adjacent to said ensement, and right of way whenever Grantee . emr. (e nucessarr. Said rlvl,L shall nor. :al feve C•ran[cr of the duty as u•: cer dancer or hazard co property or to trim or remove trees and b^n`l' to Prevent perHCns. fhe terns, ve venants .,,,it conditions of Lhis easement and right of way ,ball by binding upon and inure [n the benefit of any heirs, exvrutovs, adminiscra- torH, pLraittees, licensees, .,genes or as of gran cnr and tile sua<essora and aH Siens of Grantee. (Y RIT!:!!5S '6!iEgF.OF, the (rant nr _ ___ erecutcd this instrument this 'f Tt r ..�..%__._ _ 19-7 Exec.I l In the prey nce of: VILneSa v ." I� I,yl._.HcGU }ce,,,, CHUXED .. �'. r....... sr.f.TG9 DeTK .... ?.N.61l ?... 'etr-AC NO 3B9lB:.O1. HI HIKO MIYAMO'r0 -3- •O .L. V •H :111 � i d,.A Iif N:1: Le I,, , 15 fY, Lef --re 1h.! undo ra lk;r. ^.I, .:<.tary FL 1 c n and e'er said Cc:n :y and ••;, ;r, :•cs'diw. thcrc'.n, aa;; ec:nnissloneri a. ^.d sx:rn, rsnral =y ,,,;eared 71).<_ri 1_.- 71 LL. <Y L)•artr er. a CV:, , whcsc'nam / sub. crrted to t5e within . r.:•ru ^ent, and dul,-- ackooT;l adge• to me that Jhe_exeouted . e i ^.1Tlir >ti my hand ari oi'flcia: seal. �-- -- ;� -; .; � rat t•I�e.._ >J<, <; . .. •, ..,ca:•y u -.. Sn i4 for said _aurty -: +'- •CW SrATC Or CAL'MRNlA, ( ya County of San Dieso' ) _ t.D.. 19 �_. brlure me, the undersigned, a ON TNIS y f rrsidinq the tn, dulY eammiss,.ned and su-rn, personally ¢PDr knl.trn 1¢ me to be tar person Whose name is subscrlb,d to Satan rubhc in and for said Cowry and Stale, d"Is"' and says that he rnid,s m .I. P.. ini h r. auwrn, u,, r., the uTthin Instrument. as a l4dnrsa !hereto, who being 6y me duty - , , and that he uns pn•aent and soul Sav -j, •, tali fornia i c,reli liT " " """ to ; et y T,k ••, nw subsrri6:d ro th.• raon s_trhose namr knuum to him to be the samr Pe he yocknvcledged to s¢id aIF¢rt ant subscribed his name thereto as o ll'ilness. u .;hm rind annexrd Instrument, execute and delis rr :hie same, and tart t he_�e<rcutrd the some; and that said a1F IN wITNR45 w1 /ER WT. I have Mreune¢ :et mY hand and aJFsed my official senl the day and year in Ous r,rnjr ,isle Frs! ebaYreeiVx xWMK�"''Y'tixF /Jj; FGGILA & SK \D,{il�7 $ .• 1 �- /�, �; r.rvsa u- .--- ^:•1e. •. i,lt., Nuf¢ry Public in and)oraaidC¢uhfYa^dStage-- aA p., L,,.....aa.n Ds. 1o.•M11N 10R,A 111'11.0 7 •o t. 1 w l- ,ca X21 -99 07:57A -- eeMrUrtIY�►'' �rs�iA�.�' 7 IN IN la_ 100 GRA NT OF RIGHT OF %AV PATRICK H. DILLON and ELIZAEETH A. DILLON, huatand and hdfo. MICRAEL D. DILLCV, a single man, DONALD M. RII.LY and JERRIXE M. RIM,, husband and wife,. and DONALD R. LARKIN and RE:17f C. LARKIN, Lusbard and vi fe, , .a Lr.nmr, nn ,nJ m .. m.a4 r.r..n .a 'ha .,,m w M.r II.R.r .w +M +.Aadd........!..... •. p,.d h, OLIVERMAIN MMCIPAL WAIEA DISTAICIr a public corporal ion n l.r.rm n.nu.lrun. n.: n!ur.t. ..i�w.lv.lanJ. J.r ha nfn rnm mrad OLIVEIWIN MUMIC7AL WATER DISTRIC_ aa.a•.•w•n Y.t ,..r ✓...mawm.�•wnpin,i aa. ..10.00 f.um +uhl�•n. rl•n,....r.an.l. r..m!wnn. r!n Im.h !• rcinJw +: avnln c. m ah. r. • •xvenu r. n, nnru• q nTW e, n pru, nwmaer ,nJ w . I`etl.na ..r t rA:rna• hu ra mJ .11 ruq• w +. mp •M1a+ anw dru run m.m noun. au.l arlvrna mnu. nx Lu4n,, Ma rnn'rron.d rn(>. Jwu. hn pr. nr.nau.num ml a•.nm„nwrwnr pinpn.., n w.h nn Ywn. m.. a h •n,.n•, uam, ahrtn,.n o m.1 ands r r!o hararMUV .kv rAy'A nar .d waT r. 1....r ar rn.n r ..,.Irn•+rr.r.kvm . nnr Baum .nd wanes -Inns nnr hr nmr. n.prhar uArha nahr•dnwrn rM ram arJ •sn•.. nwn•fn r„e•.M d.rt.R •Yd L;.4r.a wq M . ry..- +.d nr „t a rnwoa m.urynh n.ar .wl.mn. d e Iwniwdur.4 nnha.l I,ah, r.Kr nc�r.rh rM rrwM m v. a.•J •uhr .n .., rra r •.•s hr I ira�m a'a rr�n rw en ,mvn.l m.rJµ.rn 4n11 Tha Ln iam wruah waranum.e nrbdrgnban {y 0.MdYl YlaYUtrn;In l,nary •a. San Diego _... rrw •er,drAn.u.wnl.rc rorwulYh JrxnlnJ »AJhn•. nr.n The Southeast Quarter of the Southwst Quarter of the Soatbwst Quarter of Section 4, Tlunehip 13 South, Range 3 West. San Rernardim Herfdian. in the County of San Ding”. State of California. accatdi"S to the Unittd States CowTvorint Survey. rtyaf�uM 21; 132 fmoom Moles! Of 3A1RV tllfe blar�'re OeDYraw .Jp11r 0 OCT IIMAN04 I .*WC b .A.1W v _ w luau V. iVA, l.ttr. FDdllt V. �;,w ..rwrc cFaVICES eALT 0 V A N r, ?J W IV 21 -99 F 07: 58A y <rsa .: ear «xw�p9t�»o.wrxH :a.lr�su�an.w„v 70000D700000ILrr•rw .vwrwM.{xn t rh.•.r..:n.wl lwJ:nrrrra_1.Ar •Iav d.J .. e.1.w. The Rortherly 20.00 feet of tad leads first sbo deaertbed. Grtwrw P..1 '17RIR...rn naam .n Haut Jell Px cna rt c nefen. nr permr e. bt a eu.J.n rnwtrtx ml. ief barLlMr .n mhrr vrYaurt. fl.r.nnr nn Yr vra+. Yr Jnb ws wrlt.. alh. wvhb, 4 finiv dwJ.lhi�n {uy 4rWta ahZI ha,.du.,A..nara..,e..rrYe tnJ ew pa�n•lh.xea rheh rwtrw+rr.bil4rrdvrr.." err n..re., .1 rY rrr .r.! tm .nJ akP iwa.am, .nc..eJ br.ah w4r,-r M .. ioJueter fl.t uPe +full by 'un. ♦tMn tad yah U J".#,. b, n14 ",I. U, rr.Tfrf LYliWhVl lhn t.N.M'M IR Yb{ A `R by P.,.d .,y, G, WR N GrW.Y irtxa.h.r «. Y:1. -r rur.nem m uumrnu .lull la µrwrN m, ualn ie.nrr wJ wiry of Lvt .J w rhr l'n.M /P wnY.re WnYr.r r {.�rMi.r 6 Y i:n YrrJrnmRJ Mwl wnJ by rM CYrira h -'W ,hu rhr G'•arm uw1... thRIX Kaat.any a u.ye W w Juno ... Nana a. 6e .r n.wJ w 4....J.... d the .bn,. J..aritJ ry hl n .k iwc��hn J.wanaar n �art.rr.l, xnYrr dw Nt, am+w nrten an.xr W r4 Gr+n.ae is �IlnN VVn @[.hr GrirnyR beve rtnvra -0ihe.r pmrtto rhw .. .. J.fd.... ... ... _.14 ..... .. tt wfj.n.4 Iffy'." - .. ._ . _.. .. / T t R,rof Na n- 919604.. _. - - - -- DRAWN BY.__ —JAP —. ACCT NO.- .O-_QU- _VA__00 - _.- DA71 i.?F11 19s. ')7h -frlrl R e•:rr- ryrl:Jl NOTARIhS -USE PROPER FORM I 07.58A rta ya CON 1"-1400 f r i I + ` I! SW%;t5EC. T.13S IR.3 w... '1C :s - IO "WATER (wic ! - l: -- EnSEHoM f 2 r /AE!/drlvtvMT 7b OKIVR `. -j - /�f AlO. S/E�a/�r6{Odr .� 17 1- 7 Barad by: is Cn�l nrrnf.g Corp. LINE fx TENd/ON N0. !9 PLAT a[ raarr.aata rayrirad by tba 011 vanhafn :'vnilipat Water D13trr ^- .> 1 Y� C�J tQ� �J RM !' e- oor- rye•ao J P.06 nil I r t1 •'II I i I� �V JY"�1F P RCCOROINO RWUKBR by :.:. — �t,�r� .0 JV v0 aRr�..o wrw w,lw Aecowo[n Ywll T< rMtchael Dillon ,L 1 aV DEC31 9MAN71 w- 243 Melrose WDIMI Enotnttas, Calif. 92024 mlYCaalt sAR WIEM fr. ,tim C7i IM 3 J I SPACE ABOVE THIN UNa FOR R[ Ue ODROaa1 U619 '1AWItl 4A ra,o 11,XYnln�laT Iran,frr la. , _. _5. L So.... w r Y . .... n. Same es above ❑ f:nn,IgllfJ en fn6 '.IW °i pnlprRy (p fnnyuleJ full kw lien. [,� • on .aloe L mrnm�ram n i remaining Iherron at lime of .de. ^ANL J San Dtegutto Escrow Compac7 fty SiN+NN Yf derbnm or seem �Lr.si. nu 1...nm, ,,.m< l'ninrory,Xlstall arc[ cty of...._...._...... _ Grant Deed LI TNI. IWY iunXl[X[o .1 ..GYm 1V TITI[ INW MNC[ Cg11.XT FOR A VALUABLE COSSMERATIOY, R ipt of which is hereby acknowledged. GEOFFREY B. DANIELS AND PA7RICIA J. DANIELS, husband and wife, hereby GRANT(S) I °PATRICK H. DILLON AND ELIZABETH A. DILLON, husband and wife, es point tenants, as to an undivided 1 /4th interest, MICHAEL D. DILLON, s single man, FA to art undivided 1 /4th Interest And DONALD M. RILEY AND IRE M RII,SY, hu8h n nd w(�s s tenant3l -ss to an unfit Ytd 1 h Lnt�re,� sd!d DOfu)I, �, LARgI�! �ND•bSrCy C. LAhIW husband end wile, following exn rc propenyln egg jOtnt tenants, es to an undivided 1 /4th Int. county of San Diego , pale of CadomiR: As per attached legal description Dec. 29, 1971 STATE OF rAUFORMA COU \TY OF %an DL*So T Ss. AVRk a 14- r P.61k r a+d 11 NW Cwnl, u,d slue. m— ,D, ! ...I Oeoflrey R. tllnl RIM and Pin l r 7 0 .1 Danial7_– YM.. MN N ba IM prnelL.Lwhre ••r a - y.rnbtm N JT wilkia illYllll.e.1 ar,d a[k- fCVY—.Ne[W the NY- 11�1� 1 V N.M ITTped N Prinrdl sl �aNrT JAN 1 02000 ENG(Ty nFI FNCIN TAISEs FOR ROTARY a[AL OR STAY; OFF Ii :.:. . �t,�r� .0 'mow . 1 ;.: ..:.i ::_I ....v4y Cli C7 C7i IM 3 I W I I � w Title Order \o_L ��10 �`a_y r...r r \ � 7 � -- — U (35 / IRn. St7) a FL _• WAIL TAX aTAT[Na/Ra M DIR[CT[O ABOVE Ty TL-e ,.E GO Yee � f_f Pf PARCEL 1: The Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 4, Tranship 13 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Base mid Meridim, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to United States Government Survey. An sasessnt for road mid utility purposes and appurtenances thereto to be used in cosmoo with others, over, under, along and acrojs a strip of land 60.00 feet in width, lying within Section 5, Township 13 South, Range 3 West, Son Bernardino Base and Meridian mid within Lot 16 of the Subdivision of Poncho Las Encinitas, according to Map thereof No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of Son Diego County, Juna 27, 1899, all being in the County of Son Diego, State of California, and the ester lint. of said strip being described " follows, 1 Coaawmting at the Northeast comer of said Lot 16 as shown m Record of Survey cop No. 6085, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diago County, August -', 1962, being &Lo m point on the Westerly line of said Section 5; thmi-w along sold Westerly line South 03'57'39" East, 1029.04 feet to a point train designated as Point "A "; then" South 861DO100" West, 149.53 feat to the center line of County Rod Survey No. 554 as show on said Record of Survey Hap :to. 6085 mid being the TRUE POINT OF D- 476124 BEGI14HIdG. thence retracing North 86'00100" East, 149.53 feat to said Page 1 of 2 c Mj 1183 Q1 G1 v ` co ?-' - ob F � M PARCEL 2t -_ An easesent for road and utility purposes mad appurtenances thereto, to be mad in memo^ sdth others, war, under, along and ^cross a strip of lend 60.00 fat is width, lying within Section 4, Township 13 South, Range 3 Jest, San Bernardino Base and Maridimi, in the County of San Diego, :;Cate of fir California, according to United States Government Survey, the center line of xsaid at 'p being described as followet Coassoucing at the Northu"t corner of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter Of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 4; then" along the Northerly line of said South Half cf the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, North 88'09'47" East, mppmsimotely ;25,00 feet to the caster line of that certain 20.00 foot easement described in Parcel I In deed to Olivenhalu nzaicipai Water District, recorded January 31, 1962 w Pile No. 18555. PARCEL 3; An oasseaat for mad mid utility purposes and appurtmissces thereto, to be used in covon with others, over, under, along mid acmes the Easterly 30.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 5, Twashlp 13 South, Ronge 3 West. Son Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to United States Govamrnat Survey. . An sasessnt for road mid utility purposes and appurtenances thereto to be used in cosmoo with others, over, under, along and acrojs a strip of land 60.00 feet in width, lying within Section 5, Township 13 South, Range 3 West, Son Bernardino Base and Meridian mid within Lot 16 of the Subdivision of Poncho Las Encinitas, according to Map thereof No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder of Son Diego County, Juna 27, 1899, all being in the County of Son Diego, State of California, and the ester lint. of said strip being described " follows, 1 Coaawmting at the Northeast comer of said Lot 16 as shown m Record of Survey cop No. 6085, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diago County, August -', 1962, being &Lo m point on the Westerly line of said Section 5; thmi-w along sold Westerly line South 03'57'39" East, 1029.04 feet to a point train designated as Point "A "; then" South 861DO100" West, 149.53 feat to the center line of County Rod Survey No. 554 as show on said Record of Survey Hap :to. 6085 mid being the TRUE POINT OF D- 476124 BEGI14HIdG. thence retracing North 86'00100" East, 149.53 feat to said Page 1 of 2 c Mj 1183 Q1 G1 v ` co ?-' - ob F � M 'e t"' — Point "A" on the Westerly line of said Sectlon 5; thence North 80800900" East, 130.41 feet to the beginning of a tangent 200.00 toot ra'Sus curve, concave Northwesterly; thence Northeasterly along the are of said curve through a central snple of 38'17'20 ", a distance of 132.70 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 47'42'40" East, 408.43 feet to the beginning of a tangent 200.00 foot radius curve, concave Southeasterly; thence North- easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 39'51'20" a distance of 139.12 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 87'34100" Eset, 254.13 feat to the beginning of a tangent 500.00 foot radius cur-to concave Northwesterly; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 24006120" a distance of 210.36 feet; thence tangent to said curve. North 63'27'40" fiat, 292.32 feet to the beginning of • tangent 200.00 foot radius curve concave Southeasterly; thence North - usterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 24'12133" a distance of 84.48 feet to the point of tangency in the Northerly line of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of *old Section 5; thence along said Northerly line tangent to said curve North 87'39'43" fast, 640.00 feat, more or less, to the Northwest comer of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Guartar of said Section therce along the Northerly line of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, North 87'15143" East, 1321.28 feet to the Eaaurly line of said Section 5. Said easement to teminste Westerly in the center line of said County Road Survey No. 554 and to tereinate Easterly in the Easterly line of said Section 5. PARCEL 5: An assenent for road and public utility purposes and appurtenances tLento, over a strip of land 60.00 feet in width, lying within the Southwest Quarter ANF.RDP.D of the Southwest Quarter of Section 4, Township 13 South, Range 3 West, San 12 -21 -71 Bernardino ease and Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of California, Typed according to United States Governnent Survey, the center line of said 60.00 10/29/71 foot strip being the South line of the North half of said Southwt Quarter D- 476124 of ft SU4vest Quarter of Section 4. .RESERVING fron Parcel 1 show an ouement for road and utility purposes and appurtenances thereto, over, under, along and across the 4orthetly 30.00 feat thereof. ' I I Page 2 of 2 \ \ o [`1 t3� i i a { 1 1 it 1 i i 1 1 E ',,' Y 7° r Ali AGREEMENT T9 LSTAl3LISH M.Tn 115 p .kW 1 0 2000 D NInTT S all of the partie 3 toEtil"EERIENCINRVIICES CITY OF Agreement possess real property with6-Mconlinea of that property described in Exhibit 'A' to this Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and, wHERIJAS all of the parties to this Agreement are desirous of establishlnG a permanent easement from County Rand No. 131 to County Road No. 147, for the puroose of ingress, egress, installation and maintenance of utilities throt:(;h the property described in Exhibit 'A' to this Agreement; and, trlHER-PAS the permanent easement sought to be established by this Agreement is more particularly described in Exhibit 'D' to this Agreement- attached hereto and in- arporated herein by reference; and, wiuTt.AS certain of the parties to tnISM104"". 1980211 FIICOIIOEO RCI E5TT e - d Agreement have prescriptive rights or prescripptttiiv &ha wjST MMPW j claims to an easement or easements of prescriptloIN lI 1 z;PH'6�1 - v._;hin the p=perties described in Exhibit 'A', 6OFPIC�Ai r1-:K l9S Ilp OIEC" COJ•a T,CALIF. - one - i i { which rights and clains n--id parties dcslrc to release and relinquish in exchange for tiic survcycu sixty foot casement road, more particularly described in Exhibit 'B' to this Agrecinent; arid, WiZMiAS certain of the parties to this Agreement have deeded rights of easement within the properties described in Zyhibit 'A' which rights of easement are more particularly set out and described by reference in Exhibit 'C' to this Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; ard, uja- Z certain of the parties to this Agreenent holding those deeded rights of easement described in Exhibit 'C', desire to release and relinquish said rights of casemcrt in exchange for the surveyed sixty foot easement iv ad described in Exhibit 'B' to this Agreement, dnd, { WHLKEAS certain Of the parties to this !' Agreement are desirous of establishing other easements with reference to a portion or portions of the property to this Agrcement described in { Exhibit 'A'; end, W)f ---aAS those certain parties to this Agreement have executed six grant deeds respc,tlnE - two - I -" I - ih said other easements, which grant deeds are listed and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 'D' to this Agreement; arid, t!HLRI•:AS those certain parties to chin i Agrcenent seeking to establish th ^se other easements, do not want said eascmcnts to be appurtenant to the entire property described in Exhibit 'A' to this Agreement; ana, i i a r_ }iHI:REAS it is the Intention o: those certain parties that these other casements are to be appurtenant to the property over t:hich the casements run, which property is o:rncd by tF.c persons granting and reserving said easements in the grant deeds of E:hlblt 'D' of this Agreement; and, jjRmEAS it is the express intention of all of the parties to this Agreement that no other easements be they prescriptive or deeded shall exist on the property described in Exhibit 'A' to this Agreement, other than the easements set forth in Exhibit 'B' to this Agrcenent, and the easements set forth in the grant deeds of Exhibit 'D' to this Agreement: 1401; THEREFOR L, IT M MUTUALLY AGREFT) 13MEE11 T}ii PARTIES TO THIS AGREL' in—,.i THAT : - three - 1 1'! I Each party hereto grants to each atrcr party, their heir:;, successors and assign a pernancnt cacencn'., described In E:hlbit 'E' attached hereto, over and across tto real property described in l:1,nibit 'a' attached LeTeto, which easenent will be for tale ourpo-c of providing ingreao, cGress, installation, and maintenance oC utilities, toGether rilth tilt right and privllcGC to Grant sU.1lar cascncnts to ot!.crc. I I Each party reserves to himself, his ne5ro, successors and assign the easenent described in Exhibit 'D' attached hereto, over and acrosa the real property described in Exhlilit -Al attached hereto, r;iUca easenent will be for „hr purpo.c of providing egress, irwtallIItloii and ;.ialatcnaace of utillti':r, torethcr Lith tnc riGnt and privilege to Grant s3nilnr casCnents to otnerc. I I I Etch party I; ^reto releases and quitclaims to the pre3ent owner of property who 13 a par::y to this Agreement, whatsoever rights or claims to easements that exist over and across the real property described in Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. t' I V t Each party hereto having any interest i { whatsoever to those :asementa referred to in Exhibit - four - i 1 I I T. 5 O� E� Pv r a= C ! C1 'C', do hereby qultcl. ^:n to the prvscnt owners of the respective parcels, the casements set forth in E•x�lbit 'C'. V The easement contemplated by this Agreement net forth in Exhibit 'li' attached hereto, is to be appurtenant, :un .ilth and benefit the real property described in Exhibit 'A' attached he re 'n. V I The casements described in the grant deeds of Exhibit 'D' to this Agreement are 2u to, run i.ith and 'benefit the property aw.r uhlch the casements rur. and is owned by the ad Oz persons grantOM INd reserving sa!' caserents. V I I The casements de scribed in the grant deeds of Exhibit 'D' Ore not appurtenant to the entire real property described in Exhibit 'A', but only the portion or portions thereof ar which the .AIL jet casements :vn and i owned by the persons grantlt reserving said easements. V I I I Any and all easements or claims to easements be they prescriptive, deeded, recorded or I - five - } I :..'i I i unrecorded, •u 1nich ars claimed or possessed by any this :: reer..ent, c:er and across one of ti.e parties to 6 the real property described in LadUblt -':.' to this Agreczcat, are hereby released, relinquished, abandoned and othcn;ise ertinguishcd with the exception of those caxmcnts described in l.he Crent deeds it: EXhi'oit IDt to ti.is AGrccrient. 1 i i I i Upon this A(tireement bcconinG effective as hereinafter prol•idrd, ti,c only casemnns existing over and across the real property described in E>:hlbit 'A' to chic Agreement, vill be the casement set forth in c.,:iiluit 'i3' to this Agreement and the eascr.,ents described in the Grant deeds of E, hlbit 'D' to this i,Ereerlent. ;his Agreement is not to be bindias Until the legal description rsa location of the eascrxnts set forth in ixhibit 'B' attached her =to to this Agreement, has been approved in !:riti by all of the parties to this Agreement. x I This Agreement Ss not to be binding upon any party hereto until signed by all of the partleu i and recorded in the uCfice of the County Eecorder for the County of San Diego, State of California. - six - i_::,I Dated, 1963. I -'.., Age-- /0 3y3, Stott 10 b"'If ------------ VIM= I STATE OF COM CALLIONSIA MIT or S,4A.' 0. W.. —. 1F. . N.I., Pbk k." 1w -W C...ry star It U Gxy of q. 1%lin w illml, cont 6w Slott. wsm* - seven - 4IISO I, (SEAL) ...... . .... - seven - 4IISO 4T4TF. OF CALAF01011A SET rM•rW.a I I (r.'N r• or IMIL I STATI Of CALIPOIROA COW TV op tL--1 0. Igg3 p.W� w w 1. W CI wT .,A P.M6 ..j 4. .;j C".4 • M . ..... �4 Thlfivpoer4 XT "N 1:,. CARJ6,-. "14AICIC -C /If. -t-CoAls, F/�/4 IC 5. A &QA 6/ Q"14 -V -9t.-CAR-lo.— 11 1,.4 , Vj d.. fL. .dPr aNrwM. 0. w A.. YW I,Wk E. Mlre- 66 Ack G*A..t OTYo Cnnl 11+•7 N PO STATE OF CAUFOINIA COUNTV at STATIOP CAUFORNIA 0. OUNTY OF W- 0. bj.. ..j.rajj. . 1.1" Pbl, 1. rj h, xW C-09 !;.j.. -rlr ACY W. 4 lasoAN. 14 lift, F;A;. __ wIrTKSr rA (Wafer S..k T S..j C, - t" t 1 4EP OHf. NDUM Oi• C 0 11 0 E 11 T The undersiCned, beneficiaries and holders of the notes secured by Dacds of Trust each cncunbinC a portion of the real pr:perty described in Exhibit 'A' attached; Hereby consent and agree to the exchange of appurtenant easemcnt3 provided in the attached Agreement, includinC Exhibit 'D' thereof, and by such consent aerce that the respective Deeds of Trust should be and they are hereby nodiried. Executed: 1963• DATE / SIGNATURE 10 -LT _4/1CCO Cf:. L` C �C_y -crci ✓i T, LT ,wT IM.a n I I I 1 1 I is E X H III IT 'A' All of Section 3, except Lots u, a, 9, 10 and Mining Cla134, survey 5076 and the II.E. 1/4 of the S.E. 1/4. T13S. R 3 14 S.B.M. All of Section 4 except Mining Lots 1, 5, 9, 10 and the 11.14. 1/4 of the S.N. 1/4. T133. R 3 41 S.B,M. Section 9 - the II.E. 1/4 and the 14. 1/2 of the 14.11. 1/4 T1 ?S.R 3 i! S.B.M. Section b, Lots 1 and 2, and the N.E. 1/4 TBS R 3 W S.B.14, 0 Section 5 - the South half and the S.E. 1/4 Eastl /2; o1' SJI. 1/4 of the of N.E. 1/4 and the N.E. i/4 T133. R 3 N S.B.M. '.. Jq M 3$" . I IT 1 agrd „H., .LSHSITY3 3ra +or7 041101:1 !3001 CC. Si, ;o ",tololp 0 .Ve,LS,rS JQ allim lr A3u,a w .,9103113 - ,".Ia pTeo ;,• a:y ago ^uulr 6;10- ;eagaar;. 8=047 .L J0levngl2r :1 laearaa 'oMn3 (d)ElECU30 onipa; iwj CC 7AL lua9uyl c jo Eu7oa71 0113 07 :on3 S5.6701 .3293 .:LZ•SS,La '1330,: 'eaaca play 01 luylwl 01171 , kiitliti.r FSrc luuta 0auo:p !6 u013aas ;7.0 1. 100; co*41 A :JagAlo!: rill Jo w7l' Al3aglaoS arl Soli. 43uo0ual jo 31tlod 011 .v 3283 L7'LGl 30 a4u21330 r ,.(jZrt?. 95 71 ol:lca lrilwaa a 4lMi'll onln3 PIC2 :o 339 o43 :unto ::1101;ra nor Alsalvrryl3 11 aaoaCl d0 L`IIw .?wu og7 ^.n)aq PUT 'A(Jn :ratilnos Oil" * 'onaaa 617Pr1.190; oc.ucL tusiueJ c glln dcna )o lulod ati) as 1003 ill -LU loo:' ,i0, li, lE 41009 9ulnaTauoa yiailoo !wIVj3a:J oulplac1aL =3 030a.. r WJae•, 141nog El dl!12u^o: Pig, 117 :. .%, 111117005 ju 700; 0p•gi A;sa1!1a ;; X13 7n mull A11oIVI.uS 0,11 3n u111alurt .dad 91301sa: aqa ,Ilia u.7320^.aolu7 sic of loa; (r•;E .1"I ..i0, 72 -IC ilaw"I olu :111 :2043 gC,17 'lcr;: .o .!Sj" 1:7ar:, 110113a; pirc Io ou71 Allag ;l ": 0'11 '!uots rouag3 !'; a^Pa0^ P7c2 ?[ 003.•.0 12tu1jllo,< rg7 70 ^nlwoYl:J',,• :0r y;•.; c9 Pagaaa,sp 'Sgaq 0130 pieo;�o .1•171 Jolcaa NO 'fi VI 'G. aacuom•g Pan. addc '.ION>•_ laamlaano7 10111^ roTa.i ny :nl nloa= •07117 ^1171] to 0:c35 'a ^.n10 ur^ in Slunra ril Ill •[.r1. 739:, A37P3ru392 ucg •Ivor E a'iue7 811311t15 El d7•.ocro5 a7 TIC 6 TaW . .v .� 7.010., �74Jin ."TAL "Pin 117 Inai C'0'0!' IN jr ::j1 i' r ca-,A= F.'r lIA!y 'Aapan a ax, m7aia,12 communan'!uc P:L• accudarul A111131 alic,nd p1-9 p9c3 11-3 5201 -x P "C caaalr.) JrJ AOn Jr 3q TA M'a 70ac:•9an 1171 'l. :Z IUM 17SS 'oil AonanS pan:: p791 In 01,f1 Actual n113 117 )n, a- ;l ar colau7j3al q,l] V% r,apin Ill 1401 00109 Purl Jr ,17130 onnnul J'ra c W, n3 cc au pout ;l<gs an pa hl geld or 03 d71ao plcu if ""T.003 oll; . Z.ST 'hl tIK1n•: '.(2w.CD .7010 lie, Jn Jrylnaw! Munro 0'10 !r ,ally., rug nl prllf 'S.(S '`.. ;!c'( t.1Alnr ;r p1ca.,; un urolio 9c rim 'oploan;: 4177011i,: .o ZSGSCI •r- 320 :JU1.uj ..r 1 -61 of aOr Io1dI10 P0P30303 •n7010 a,:S :o Alu.wa m!l 01 poop at pagYalop By ?SS -all AOnanS pr1i xlwop tc oull -071100 Will :Illn 11o1lameJa3u) ay Ill Ilia- gc•Sl it l.la1TJ)s'•3dd9 'tan. LS. �[,'�� Ill.wt- ='Jli 101(cac:1 Plc, :u.,1r 0x:o-i1 !C -St 003110ldoS al P07cau1 ern Ara !a 34:13 rlro ac la)31a70 a47r.. Irela7ue; n!l;NV:aw71:. cal Jr Lrn ;o 3r°ll .1u11nell 0­11 CC', Z "3 Ao 9-171 J0111.13 30;3 cl calla. 7';111 Ir prinac.r.I dalaol'wS 3007 C.! LZ iwa ,,an lotlrrrd cl S3Tin cuil a lain n "133n�Aalul ac nl :r'07 ZC'S(SI Al atacpa.3ddc 'Iva:. .LO.ZC ZS ,3-n't an3a3 ,,Iry nl )II:l:ucl 031:1 1 !7001 Z'E, 1 10 o411y JS7p r .SO, I1. G fr 01:uc IEZIa82 r 4:0.:3•;1 mall Plus 3, liar ol-I "uqc f. (Ja73rn :pao$ 00,•0111 !l1Jp� :0.v :13r :! ca9woa 'o"i, cnirwa tr•v_ 0C'tvri 1•In ?col I• ),, Ja7nu;:oq 1-13 n1 :..0! [r•(9n'Is* ;r,! Z• :E';Ian^'NInu7 Imo o,I1rr2 • t .'1 .3+ 1: :: ! 3: t ;1 !•t r0f F.)'Lcl 'Ica .;WLIC 'i3ns ^ap :u)l - „a r1,.ill :u: trial....11, E :.•:c. ..;1n.S CI ..y;enCl,: n191 9i 2.1770:•^ Io loot (C'•.1 `1 :0413 ^.; 1.11 10 0011 210.,•1.,11.5 9:11 !.• u.7mbn ..31 .a .7703; a'V 'Vin n: lyaccl :nui = 111 u•aj Lr'IL '30,: pies ;. oc1. A13a,,:ln•: l.o luolu ainaq) :p U'll3a$ PTA= 1• 3011AI'a 3ey,g31 ,,:1 IT lulo11a la;i :Oft It') rc P"Plaill' ;.nag e733” Plc2 )a an -1 001,:0 r?1 'CfCI 'at Aar,ra 1111 p9nraddc ' / :eon{ 311 :mn3aa•) 0030.,, Patlad nl nu)PU.32, •ryu3.:Ti1 °: r wvI :'1'.910 er )r. (Ivan* 0,,1 1I 'Lvlpl307 .u7p30uAa.. ar(! 'lsa C r7ur' 'qt ✓S C[ Ai'1r. a. aS 'S 11••113,5 :•1q)7n'1a7S1 . :spin ui 1so1 CO•Cri Purl i'° r11aK army 7,.r :uole •1nF•In •3:•e: .,301.,.;1 aa3+mupl3rddr pus ouod3nd 431113n a71rn•1 Pill' pro3 101 yvat'•a ply coo34ul 1,1 Arn )c 1'.713 pall lay.,^cy9 +N 111::. S it lA3 :Vd 1r,64 P, 'yve!)a Co t: DCB13313( ?) 1;C: i': to Bald curve :hurt:+ 29 '02 VP' East, 1^3.03 feet to the I)CLlnntnl; of a teats: . 200.03 foot radius curve, Qa.eaVa Sanheaatarly; thence Gortleasturly and Easterly slant tl.s are .,, said curve thruuLh a central antio of 4779130" a diem. .e of 165.37 feet; theme tanlont to said curve North 7,'42'32' E.,St, 4ei.L,3 feet to tine bet,lnnlni. of ► tangent 500.00 toGt radbe curve, ca,cove ;aortitoeatcriy: [hones 8•rthoasterly along till, are of raid curve Oroo17, a Central aty,la of 17'49115" a dlstaoca ail 155.49 fact; thence tangent to Said curve h; rth Sa'S2'S7" East, 535.05 Oat to the be,tnntnl. of a tan,^,crt 2'11 J3 foot radius tune, concave ' :eaterly; th wag northerly alont) the arc of Said curve thr:o;h a coutral mtLie of Lo'06135" a Jlctance of 230.77 sect, tbeuco taa_.a.0 t • maid c.1ma North 07'1:'13" =est. 15!.4.5 feet tr, the bcLiu -.!n; of a txgear 330 M fat.t redit -s e•,rvr, eunc2va Seut: :easturly; tleeeo 1.•,rtheurrriy along the arc of said rime or•+ul;n a eentrnl ani le of 32`57'29" a distance ,,f 172.55 feet, thence tan;,ent to said curve L rth 25'43'42" tact, 623.21 feet t- the beLLnnin;_ of a tangent 201.07 [not rulius Curve, concave SsotheNy; thence !: rtleast••r17. Easton, sad Su•,theastariy alu:t: the arc of said curve thruuLh a central au;,ia of 90'52'00" a distance of 317.)3- fact; thence tangent to said carve So,•ti. G3'24'l::' a distance .. 17D..'b icet to the :,40hnin;. . a tan;;CnL M. J1 feat radtur Curve• CO"Caya Sot "Westerly; t).eaee 5ot'"asterly al and the arc of maid c eve throuln a central an;•lu al 47'DC'3.1' a dlstnocu .•f )tu.27 fact; taeuee tanglent to said Curve. Sm•Ch 1527y'la" East, 2.33 feet to the begsntnr. ai a tanpant 203,00 foot radlvs curve, concave Cort4ciaterly; thence South asterly and Easterly alunt, the are of said curve thrcut;h a central aaEle of J9'4030" a distance of 313.49 feet, thence tangent to rald curve ',-rth 74$2112" East, 467.ri2 feet to t:ta bel,LnninL of a tanLcnt 241.51 foot rediL■ curve, concave Souvmrly; thence Eaotorly along, the arc of maid eurea tbrau;,!t a ca,t :al anEfe o5 :3'23'35" a J!stanea of 9B.o9 feet; tl,caec tangent to said curve South 72'74`13 East 9.S1i loot to the beLiwdut of a tangent 49.44 foot radi..s curve, cuncava :aut.•watsrly; tlknee Soucteasterl) and Southerly atop; the arc of said crrva thruuLh a central anEle of 75'52945" a distance of 04.44 feet to t'e boLLnalug of a caonpnund 100.04 foot raJi :s ct.rva; G:ence Soutirmstorly aloni, the arc of salt curve thr,tlh a eeutral antic of +:'12'45' a distavee of 73.21 fact; thet,ca tangent to said curve 5outh 34'3:'17" ;cat, +4.45 fact to the betiunlnp of a tan;,tnt 155 51 Coat radiva curve, Concave Eastarly; t: ^_oea Southerly stun;; the are of maid cum-.' through a caotrnl ani is of WS"30 a distance of 97,53 feet to ti,e he; inn(n- of a ea :putnul !f3.39 foot radius curve; thence Smahwstarl, alma the arc of said curve tl.roulh a central angla of 10'37'20" a distance of 93.21 feet -. thenee taaynat to Ca!d Curve south 31'5!:'23" Eatt 144 14 feet to ties ba,gn:ninc vi a tea ^_ant 37.4,:7 f.,et radtus ecrv,e, Ccneave 6nctaaa.• thence Sour4el easterly a',,nL tie 2rC +1 Said cute-_ thr•,u;h 2 central n,;,._ of 35 37'40'` a distance ai 214.52 iact to t%o bel,innin., of a co:'pacuJ I3L.A foot radlna carve; thence Caatcrly and :ert::ls6LcrI( a'oni tea Ire of maid carve tiam:Eh a cratral eal,lo of L0`77'SY• a distarea of 184.33 Le "t thcrec tant,Cat to. said cove :: rth 32'17'37' :att, 31..3E foot to the oCtianina ..f a ta..gent. 300.00 foot red LYa curve. concave roctaeastcrty; tl,e. :cc l:arthnastcrl) along .. the are a: said at eve tlelonOh a central olg.lc of 43'i, '2i' a distance GE 211.67 feat; thcuea tan, ent to maid curve ;lort!. 73'J'032 East, 140 93 feet to the berinniog; of a tangent 570.00 loot radt,-a curve• concave ::orthucatcrly; thence !7 ituaateriy a long; tl,e are of said curve t'arouga 3 central aaLle of 23'41'45" a distance of 20a 79 feat; thence tanLer,i to said curve S rth 47'23'47"_ East. 612.95 feet to Eng.tnoer'f Station 2 "30 51- on the eeotar :too of tint EXHIH1': 111'1 pa,e 2 of 4 Type: 30 ••.- C W'. t;:an 20.00 foot atrlp .1 'land knows " Thoeas Access Load Co. 3 as deaetibed In that CCrLaLt Ins[raa+ent recorded ray 12, 196.3 as Instrument Ila. 99339 of official 'aeords. The sidelines of said strip to be prolml.ed or ahertened s0 so to fnm a emttincwe strip of land 60. =) feat in vldth Whitt- teretnate „n Cm :;.:rt'n:asc in the center IL,a of said Thetas' Mecca twd ! ;a. 3. PA: .It 3: Aa aYOmnt and rtrbt of way for lntress and cLress for road and public utility purpotra and appulte"mall thereto over, under, alone and alt. as a air 1p of lad v0.0J feet In uldth lyin;; within St: tion 3, Towns! ip 13 S:.uth, ,.=go 3 West. San Bernardino 1;cridisn, in the County of San Dleto, Slate of California, aceordlnC to L%Ated States Oovermlrat Svrt•cy. aprr•wed I:.weober 19, 1500, the center line of said atrtY LMag deecr'Led as follrvs: C,, =Lee at tite ; ;orth p:arter carver of said Section 3; thence Sat.tl. 31'53900" 121.55 feet to m A:tersee Lion Wit!' With t:tat course IAvutL a bearloi, of South 43.27'GO" last is the center land of the 40.00 foot unsurveyed Cm,uty .toad 42 said hand Was lecatcd and vatsbliatted on Naveober 7, 1959, said Inter- section Wi S lnti+u:ar'■ Station 0 00 as t!m center lino of that 23.30 Lu•t scrip ui land label" sa T Iowa Acess !;oad No. 1 as described in Clint Cartel" Inatrvt:nc reeerded YAY 12, 1900 as Instr•=.—A 1;0. 99339 of ulflciai !.CCOOs, tad being the isles VuUrl 9r GBCLf.Il`X,. thence 210nb t'le c'"OT line of as id ,Lucas Access Road South 01S9'00•' :lest 1162.22 feet; e4vnee kavtnt said center line, = atlaufrl South u1`5S'00" * :.at, 11u.17 fe4t w the 31ut:ovt ennec of t!Ie'Lrt;wast luartcr o: tiw N.:ire:r:est ,uArter C. said - :ctrl[) 3 a.a7 t;te ha"Sn.tL.g u: a MIrvInt 152.•:9 i•)rt radlea curve, erneave N rtir+eatcrly; theme >ouLUtCatdrt- alma. t... arc •: anLd etrv0 lhr.,u;;t a c•••Itral an.le • i 51 4_'1d" a distamu of 174.1,) fee.; :LCmd tangent aid c to trva ;W-:t 53'45'17' -.est appr...11r4tely j3. 1S feet tc au a.ttla paint in the touter 1 LIIe . +f said DvAr ACCe93 :.tad :Id• 1; t7.dnee a; ".,� sate center 110•: toe frd l•xi•tL c vteea .u:d dtataneas: Suuti+ )L tat 0.5i :Oct to the oa ;I:tntaL cf a tx,tem 100.00 toot radhe ecrvds c+:.csvo :WrC.;rlj; ':^.atoal; alor.• Ve Ave tf said rutvd tnrrugh a cc:.tral aagio of 4: 2-'10" a dista.ce of 72.:3 fast; tanyeat to said crrie i�•rut w 3.. ^aJ" +cat, 7 +. 7: :act t.• :`.: SeLlcnlo; �•: a •a ae-a 813 3.3 foot radios Curve, aurrava .",t, thaastdrlY, S;-,tl:JCrlcrly *I it. the are at said curve t:r.at'I a cc:.tra' w-04 o. 2 ;'04'2)' a dlara.ca of . . feet: tauleul to aid cctvu South 47'0x'00' ' ;oat, "-W icat; m:d S.r.,t!: 01 92'30" "ash, 275.13 lir feet to XULL,:cur's Stat' "" 0 O3 on t!'c Canter a o[ril anon Access xoad No. 21tM!kWC alvn„ On ceatar :fm of aa_d Am' "t hc.ss _.ant 2 LIM 1011uvlay c.wracs and Jistv:eca: Saat'.1WO erly along tilt a -c :+ `.9.00 Etc. •adius curve, concave L;buthaasterl7, thruuLll a central antic. o. 14 "34156" a distance of 104.14 feat; tau6or.i to saLA enria South 04 27'24" ;esc, 265.81 feat to the bu;;tunluL of a tangent 150.00 :oat radius curial concave Purr lryenta¢y, auuthvesterly alont. 'the are of said a:roo tLr,. u0i ,t cantsal an61c of u1.,3;,4U,, a dLaiancc a. 171.9: feat• canluni. t, sa:J sttria Smith 55`51120" vest, 3.3.21 feet to 2n,[:100.'5 Statiwt 3201 : 52.00 oil tLu center line survey of the Second San Diego 1,queduet; conttmdnL South 55'51'20" rest, 78.46 feat w the �c +;[nntr.,; of a tangent 100.00 foot radlua curve, en,•- 0.417113( %i v L x lGrt; • l t 1L of 46'32'W " a dLSauca of feet; Caatant to said aorrh 177 Yayc 3 of 4 EXHIBIT "73" Typa:}c flow rJ 17.b9 ':eat, 42.63 feat to thin beginning of • tan Sent 130.00 foot radluo curve, eersrie ti.rthcasterly; 1:orthwestcrly alone the arc of said arvc through a central on;,1c ..: 43 57'57 a d(ataoce of 99.75 feet; tangent to Said c.m'c Kurth WW50 "'.:cat, 50.44 feet to the ba,iuninl of a tan;o:it 101.9) faot radiuo curve, coneava Suutl,wasterly; :Ior U: westerly and '„stcTly aleny Uw arc of said curve lirtw Dh a uvotral acglc cf 74'2•'40" s distance of 129.37 feat; tangent t.r aaid curve :ouch 72 16'30" :cat, 156.32 Loot; South 62'04'4l" neat, 491.2) feet to the bcptnoiot, of a tarv.onl 250.00 foot radiva curve, concave Southe"torly'. Ooutirv<sttr ly a]onL CLa art of uid curve through a central ankle of 47'15'31" a diets. nee of 206.20 feet; tanECnt to avid curve South 14'49'10•' .'eat, 159.79 feet; South 06'02'30" test 320.50 feet; and South 10'52'42' East. 7.07 feet to garineer's atat Lan 0 00 nn the center line of Shords Access Road Ho. 3; thence aloe;, the center lino Dr:2BD of said'.hoiva Access 'toad ao. 3 the f..IL.:anf; a.urocs and distance S: 9/13/63 Southwesterly along the arc of a tangent 150.30 foot radios curve, concave DF913313(P) feet; and ta:ngcntr- 3R said c curvet c South 36C WSW' Veeete 1051 c 23 feet.125.34 EXM TT aW 2AGE a of a EX if ID I 'C' 1. Idichael E. Grant and Tracy Erigga do hereby quitclaim the casement contained in deed recorded in the Officn of the Rccorder of Can Diego County Series 2, Dook 1962, "rile nuabcr 128056, on July 26, 1962. 2. Nathan S. Carl and I•Iarrarct S. Carl do hercb. quitclain the casement contained in decd recorded in the Office of the Recorder of San Dlego County Series 2, Book 1962, File number 126055. 3. 3hcodore E Koons and Frances If moons do hereby quitclaim al_ casements reserved in deed recorded in the Offlcc in the Recorder of San Diego County, Junc 11, 1959, + q. Emil 7x, -Aan and Ruth V. Dumatin and John D. Gibson and Florence L. Gibson do iiereby qu_tclaln the easement contained in the deed recorded in the office of the Recorder of San Diego County NAY 25, 1959, Dook 97681, Pare 136. 5. Ralph Staver and Kar ?.an Staver do hereby quitclaim the casements contained In the decd recorded in the 0ff'ce of the Recorder of San Dieggu County, April 29, 1963, as. Instmment number 73145. 6. John P. Gaty do hereby quitclaim the easements in the deed recorded in Office of the Recorder of San Die Go County, April 29, 1963, as Instrument nulaber 73148. r i SE I::,JI e¢oRnea RteD[nm o 1LLr1 MXCN R[LCRDCD ,I�rL CO _...___..._._.._.._..,..._- I VaC[ AaOV[ TH10 LM[ rCR r1rCOlAD[11'e W! AfFll S.._ _....._.._ _....,L0. STAMPS IN THIS SPACE GRANT DEEDUNDIVIOUALI I FJ(0jr1N GATY THEODORE 0: KOONS and FRANCES A: KOONS ex's tow muisne touxnsr or a +iac mlt ixsutrxu mRr FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, do WAY the real property in the Canty of Son Diego. State of Califreia, described 1s: �I An caeanenc and right of way tngreas and ogres• for red and pnblie utility purposed and appurtenances thereto o.er, under, along and across a strip of T imd 60.00 feet in width lying within Seetlon 4, TWathip 13 South, Reage 3 Beet, San Bernardino Meridlaa, in the County of Sat Diago, fiesta o! California. ae_ording to United States Gworn ant Bundy, spprmed Nwenber 19, 1880, the center line of told strip being described as follows: Cor ncing at the Nurtheaet corner o[ Sectiaa 8 In said Tovaship 13 booth, p.an(,e 3 Beat, San Bernardino Meridian, thence along the ETort'oerly lino Qf Raid Section 3 West 8 North 59'51'32" Out, 41.36 fast; thence Scarth 31'21'02' tfest, 21.57 foot to an inteldactioa with the Westerly prolongation of the Souti:eTly line of the Itcrtherly 18.00 feet of them, contiming Se,uthhiP.13 , Sough, Congo 3 heat, San Bernardloo herldian; ilea[, 107.:2 '_cat to the point of cusp with s tangent 200 00 foot radius cD. v♦ corcwe Sou-Vic thence Northeasterly and 'Wtetly along the err o[ said curve through a central angle of 56'34'20" a distance of 197.47 feat to the polnr of tangency vith the Southerly 14, o[ the Northerly 18.00 test of feet to c the beginning of la tangent Southerly 00 00 foot nradius curies' cone"a[1lt �' }5 north 87*512" nrh vestorly; thence Northeasterly along the are of sold dune through a central angle of 5; °52'50" a distance of 205.53 foot; them* taageat to oo� tarasat North 29 "02'32" East, 193.03 feet to the beginning of a tsayn. radios c,,"c, concave Seotheutarly; there NoreseasteTly along the are of said curve through a central angle of 47'39'30" a distSacs Of 165.37 feat; thence tangent to said curve North 76'42102^ Last 465.63 feet to the beginning j of a tangent 500.00 foot radius tuna, earns Not darestuly, hexing angle cf 17'49'05 "; thence along the tangent bearlags of told cure u follows: Dr:FBO North 75 °42'02" goat, 78.38 teat to 31.61ofast t ttherTRUI POINT Of gSCllMXM; I 9/12/63 SearinZo; and North 58'52'07" [eat. DFd13314(P) thence at right angles South 31'07'03" gut, 251.80 fee th,nu South 68'04'48" Beet, 537.71 feet, more or less, to the intersectlon with the West line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Seetion 4. _ I'—,' .,-, Stai- f CM4 sl��v DATS in WA fm OW camotly IW SIAJ*. immoull 4A, liz k.c. It mt to bt W Few AM to lit _Llhlh 6MINftMf 44 ki%�,djj wl-7;6z.. qiKtlw lit WrMS I hind old ollkill IJIL I SUL I 4C "EXIUBIT p .......... •¢o.00.o .twu. ra .. I-#,;i r.U...Co... •••�. •a salt No.L SPACE s ac[ �ovr. "M un[ Von e[coeo[m s ua[ istsor at Affix S _ LA. STAMPS IN 'vi SPACE GRANT D_EEDRNDIwoUAII 1 teallST of emoa TIM JOHN P. GATY FOR A vAIUABIE CONSIDERATION, de htftbf GRANT to the real preperl; in the JOHN B. GIPSON as.d FLORE14CE L. GIBSON Cocab of San Diege, SI41e OF California, described es: An easement and right of way for ingress and egress for road and public utility of purposes appurtenances the Southwest Quaeler of Section 4rrTownsh Township 13 South, et and of the 3 West•. San Bernardino Meridian, according to United States Government Survey approved November 19, 188001 and the South 18 feet of the West 60 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest !iluarter of said Section 4. Shh el Cwa7 al • ItpTf. eehrt ot. G IA1F1.__._. a......._.._.___y_[. •. lahn4d. a ry4At r and tar tail fwnry ad Salt. aersaiuAl aptne4...._____ _. ✓_l.LiAf' _ - __........ .. b e Inamhme to be llr ryta_.:Matt l!H.��"��' ... Me •ilhe n!Immtnt tn�didlt��,���'GY .pauld trawl$ mr hod fed olfN4t ).: �i . ^........ ' "j♦ ct!.Ffi7 r. EXHIBIT ° ! li �•� ...n o. n._..�iw w. ua irr•w.ww .on i Ili I I WIN M. Iscm M. SPACE 'ROVE D M UA`E FOR PCCOROER a USE Affix & I.A. STAMPS IN THIS SPACE GRANT DEEDuNDiYIDwEI BuKqO( and RUTH V. BaJKAJV ion B. uIBSON and FLORENCE L. GIBETC't HIS FOX I"smil (VAIrsf OF "ION I'm jos"I (away IFOR A YAMBU CONSIDERATION, do herebY The real property in The Count? of San Diego, Stale of Cahlomia, described as: An easement and right Of way for ingress ana egress for road and public utility purposes and appurtenances thereto u, r, under. c,,,,g SOd S,mms the North 42 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quart r of Sectim 9. Township 13 South, Range 3 West, San Bernard1no MerldiSr, Rccordleg to United States Omernm"Dt Survey approved November 19, 1880. State of 0441 "WA It C'001 of 4' D"Ece I Issad.,sVINT. , Iblaff Phk in Im! IV ME (0101 ad SW fsfo4 //,; . . _*wry -K--am"If j '6 W!" my P1 I it SE 44. r; mmXUT "Ir II ucorowo rteeuno \+ I w.�N1, rrcoroto .ri�+o OAco 6CAar la. _....._. _.. _._......_..__....._.... aMC[ aeOV[ TH11 t19[ FOR PICOP OEPa ueE _ dill 3 ..._......._.__.is, STAm M ENS FAff GRANT DEED onviDUALI Inf IMP ruP6AlA (DuRnlr AI W N IOU niYwN(I JOHN P. GATY FuR A VAEUAB11 CONSIDERATION, do h:rebi GRANT to the real property in the RALPH STAVEH and MARIAN STAVEIi County of Stn D'reye. State of Calilsmit, desuibed is: / An easa,.c t and rtght of way for lngrlea and agrees for red and public utlllty purposes and appurtenances thereto over, ender, along Pad across a strip of laud 60.00 feet in .ddth lying within Section 4, TouMbip 13 Sath, Range 3 ':cat, S:u, Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of California, accordinz to Potted State* Cuvertraent Survey, aPPrmd Naverbar 19, MO, the center line of said strip being described as foliose: Coesloncing at tha liortheast corner of section 8 in said Township 13 South, Range 3 :lest, San Bernardino Narldian; chance along the Northerly fine of said Section 8 North 89'51'32" West. 41.36 feat; chews South 31'21'02" WcAt 21.57 feet to so intersection with the Wstlecly proton;atiaa of the Southerly lion of that vott1tarly 18.00 feet of evades S in said Township 13 South, gangs 3 '.lost, San aernardlno iteridlan; thence eaatiming South 31'21'02" West, 107.52 feet to the point of cusp with a tansant 200.90 foot radius curve, eanceva Southoeatarly; thence Nort,wastarly sad seacarly along the arc of said curve througb • central angle of 56'34'20" a dirtmce of 197.47 fact ` to the pofA.c c: taogeney with tlw Soueherly line of the Northerly 18.00 test of said Section 9; thence along said Scut.wrly line North 87'55'22" salt, 1049.55 feat to the beginning of a tangent 200.00 foot rdiu- curve, coacsve Northwesterly; thence forth along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 58'52'50" •.dL$ Wce of 205.53 feet; thence tangent to said curve Nortlt 29'02'72" Cast, 193.03 feat to Ca beginning of a tangent 200.00 foot radius curve, emeava SouthsYterly; thence sortheasterly along the arc of said curve []rough a central Bugle of 47'39':0^ a distance of 165.37 feat; thence taagent to said curve North 76'42'02" East, 465.63 feat to the beginning of a tangent 500.00 foot radius curve, concave lbrtbwsterly; thence Northeasterly along the art of said curve through a central angle of 17'49'05" a distance of 155.49 feet; then" tangent tz said curve Worth 58'52157" East. 535.08 feet to the begimtog of a taasent x$.00 foot radius curve, concave Northwesterly having s Cau"St angle of 66'06'35 "; thence %long a tanfent bearing of Bald CvMs North 5$'52'57" East, 41.38 fast to Dr:FBD the I'nilE POLYP OF PEG DO;LAO;-tbsaes at right angles Worth 3]'07'03" West 9/13163 160.70 feet; thence North 58031'03" Vast, 631.64 feat; thence North 01'30'43" M132115(P) ' :est 61.75 feet; thence North 50'06'43" West, 255.48 feet. sts!t of c"It of klere me. the *rjptd, a Noll htlic in W new CON14 MW Mle, III ut^ sopww.,--- Lj.,. known to Me is be the Pew the within inSINo;., end art F., -44P twcvw Ik on. IFITESS ISIM FXHIFiir i nano•p�wm •aeusoao a. ) w•aw nam•oae .ua.o liLate ■ - - - - -_ _- _ __ - afAaC IOOV[ THIS LINE FOR R[COROCR'f USE WIT S .___........ ___ )L STAMPS IM this SPACE GRANT DEEDuNDIVIDUM MODORE 6. KDM and FRANCES X KOON3 uRAHT to JOHN P. GATY IBIS rows IUrelal, C"Il51 d Wire nnr WiU -M.I Im FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, do bereft the real properq in The County of San Diego, Slate of Cllilern4 dc=6 ll ai: An assessrnt and right of way for inVmse oNd ajreas for road sad public utility purposes and appurtenances thereto Dear, under, along and acrose a strip of land 60.00 feet in width 1••ing within Sectim 4, Tovoehip 13 South, Range 3 Neer, San ilernardlne, Heridloa, in the County of Ban Diego, State of California, according to United States Caverrltsent Survey, approved Nevesber 19. 1880, the center line of said strip being described to follows: Coranenciog at tae Nortbeut corner of Section 8 in said Tounship 13 South, Range 3 Neat, San Bernardino Herldim; theme along the Hort:.erly line of aatd Section 8 North 89'S1'32" treat, 41.36 feet; theme South 31'21'02" Vest 21.57 feet to InA intersection with the Westerly prolongation of the Southerly line of the Norrherly 18.00 feet of Section 9 in said Ta blp 13 South, Range 3 West, San gernuJluo Meridian; theme continuing South 31'21'02" Vest, 107.62 feet to rho point of cusp with a tangent 200.00 feat radius curve, eoscava So-j Oeasterlyi thence Northemterfy and futerly along th- arc of said curve through a central eagle of 561 a dlstame of 1. feet to .sae point of tmrancy with Clue Southerly ling of the Northerly 18.00 feet of said Section 9; thence along said Southerly line North 8755'22" E-st, 1049.55 fact to the beginning of a tangent 200.00 foot radius curve, concave Nor -hvrsterllrl 0anee Northrasterly along the ae of said curve through a central angle of 5352'50" a diatom& of 205.53 fact; thence tangent to said curva Herth 29'0272" Beat. 193.03 feat to the beginnins of a tangent 200.00 foot radius curve, concave Southeasterly; thence Horthwtarly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 47'39130" a distend of 165.37 fact; thence tangent to said curve North 76'42'02" swat 465.63 feet to the beginning of a tangent 500.00 foot rodlue curve, conrs North- westerly; thence Northeasterly along the ace of 6"- curve ttrough & central angle of 17'49'05" a distance of 155.49 feet; theme tangent to said curve North 58.52'57" Bast, 535.0b feet to the beginning of a tangent 200.00 Loot radius curve, concave Nurthvestsrly; then" Northsuterl., and Northerly along the arc of said curve through a central =&te of 66'06'35" a dlstanes Of 230.77 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 07'13'38" Nut, 159.69 feet to the beginning of a tangent 300.00 foot radius curve, concave Southeasterly; thence Northeasterly alms the &.c of said curve through a central angle of 32'57'20" a distance of 172.56 flat; tbama tensmt to said cnrve North 23'43042" goat, 623.21 feet to tb& bsglmias of • tangent 200.00 font radius curve, ccmgve Southerly; theme Northeasterly, easterly and sou.baascarly does the ere of said curve through a control angle of 10'52'00" a distance of 317.18 feet; theme tangent to old tuns South 63'24118" Wt, 170.83 bet to the beginning of a tangent 200.00 foot radius cLrva, having s euntral arv'r of 47'38'00 "; thence along a tae {sot tearing of said curve South 63'24'!6" Bt, 88.26 feet to the point of intersection of t as he revaree tangent bearing of Dr:FBD said curve being the TRVg pOPf2 OP BBCDWrSG; thence Borth 19'5307n gut, i 9/13/63 299.42 feet; theme Korth 36045'52" lest, 607.:9 fast. lm oid&linea of said DP113316(P) strip to be prolcnbed or shortened so as to tersioata on the southseat in the tangaat bearings of the 200.00 foot radius suns lest above do crib". Sl&kOl CAAIi�,r.,4 1 11 CM4 OF 5.41- 01-C4 0 bom M. 0 11 D. -'a . . ... ... ..... lk W*n*K I V*Iwl h6k IR IW fit UW t"* WA S?Mt- WSO"ll WwW-nW,2,OOCX--AEAN&—'r ---- X� 00, .... ... ... ....... l I I tti eeoomo�.o euvterto � ` wRBR Scaeata RAM ra i SPACE AeOV[ TNm UM[ FOR R[CORDEeI USE 1 ABR i._ --._._ _ L 91M M 11113 via GLINT DEED(INDlvfo ) ills 14th IMISK" t:nl[St N mini wa pAu,fl sfAVER end MARIAN STAVER FOR A VALUABLE (ON;IDEAAi100, do hereby GRANT to the real property in the JO@1 P. CAW County of San Die", State of California, deso4d at An easement and right of ray for ingrue •Ng egrese far coat" lye utility purpose• and appurtenances thereto met. v64", along and serou a attip of lend 60.00 feat in Width lying Within Section 4. Township 13 South, Range 3 Meet, Sm, 8aruardinn Meridian, in the Couuty ofSonDiego. Stata of California, accordinJ to United State• Cwomarent Surta y approved November 19, 1880, tha canter line of said strip belr.g daserlbad u follows; Cocreancing at tie ll"rtheest corner of Section 8 in sate. Townshi2 13 Smith, Range 3 11est, Gan eernardtno Mecldi=; thence along the Nortbvly line of ` said Section J North 89 °51'32" treat, 41.36 fee!; thence South 31'21'02" West 21.57 feet to an intersection with the Wea:erly prolongation of the Southerly line of th; ::orthorly 18.00 feet of Section 9 in said Townebip 13 Soutb, )l112184 3 '.ecc, Sin 3ernerdina Ilarid /an; thence continuing South 11'21'02" West, 107.62 feet to the point of cusp with a tangent 200.00 f= _ua curve, co.rcavn Suutheastorly; rl.enea h;ertheasterly and Gsteriy ■long the are of said curve thr -AiLh a central angle of 56'34'20° a distance of 197.47 feet to tha poem of tent, oncy with t1e Southerly line of the Northerly 18.00 feat of cold Section 9; thence along said Southerly line North 81'55'22" Last, 1049.55 feet t� than bofinning of a tangent 200.00 foot radium curvet coal Nartbweeterly; tl,muce llartheostet iy along the are of said tune through a central angle of 5..'52'50" a. distance of 2,)5.53 :act; themes tangent to amid curve Forth 29'02'32" But, 193.03 feet to the beginning of a taageat 200.00 foot radius curve, concave Southeaat2tly; tboaca Northeasterly along the arc Of said curve throuch a central angle of 17'39'30^ a dlatsaLw of 165,37 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 76'42'02" gut, 465.63 fee: to the beginning of R tangent 500.00 foot radlua curve, coocoe Bostlneaterly; thence Northeasterly along the arc of Bald curve eFSOOgh A control angla of 17'49'05" a dl6taneo of 155.49 feet; thence tugenc to said curve North f 38'52'57" Last. 535.03 foot to the'baglanine of a tangent 200.00 foot radium curve, coucs•a Nirthueseerly having a CCUtral angle of 66'06']5''; thence along a tantant heorinG of said curve Nortb'58'5Y7" Seat, 41.8 act to Dr:FBD the 1RUR PO117I OF 1SCDTilx; theca at righ "Sias 9/13/63 150.70 feet; thence North 58'31'03" West. 631.64 last; thence North 01'30.43" DP013315(P) test 61.75 fort; thence North 50'06'43" West, 255.48 feet, more or less, to the centerline of the existing waterline easement granted to the I Olivetthain Municipal Water District; thence North along sa1A centerline to ■ polo, said point being 20 feet North of the South line of Government Survey Lot 7 of aid Section 4. ALSO; an easement as above over the South 20 feet of said Government Lot 7 lying East of the centerline of said :aterline easement to the West line of the East Half of said Section d. '3 1 Slate if e-Xzlio"IA Casey of "'V 01 ........ . . 12.0 UTN ........ . . . . . IXB= *jr . . . . .. ... . ............ R[CJRD� "6 R(JU[R[J rr ' w "w w[cowom "u� ra L SPACE AWVt r M U"At FOR "CORDER a Use IYa7d L� Affix S.__.. ..IA SIAM ■ m SEAR GRANT DEED novibulu RA XE STAV13i and WIAN MVIR GRAHE to SEf.UR11'f TrrLE DSUBAHCE Co., AS TRUSM OF ITS TRUST Ho. Pr 1099 1 Dr:FHD 910/63 Dy413315(p) tat QOM IA[ISeU coup Gil w "'M Inc: nwua, ,w FOR A YALUAS1E COH:'o(RAT10H, do hereby the real properh in the CsaMi of Sao Die". State it Catdwd4 dauw ttc +, An esaeeane and right of wy !or ingsue and •grass for sloes sd Mrssa utility purposas a a i.apput:aoaacee thereto over, under, a strip of land 60.00 feet in width lying within Section 4, Township 13 South, Range 3 Vent, San Bernardino Mcrldlen, in the County ofYSea Diego, lit"Es of calitornis, Iccoodter Ito United State@ belntg de tar LAed sasfollwat mar of 19, loco, coramne{ng at the lio= thedet corner of Section alonlaid �o°una�rlytlio� ot� Rogge 3 Jost, Son Bernardino Meridian; said Section 8 Borth 89'51'32" Nast, 41,36 feat; thence South 31'21102" Veat 21.37 feat to an intersection with the westerly prolongation Of the gcutberly If" of the Ilortherly 13.00 feet of Section 9 in ar14 Twaship 13 South, paege 7 'Jesa, San Bernardino ticrtdl an; thence emtim Lag South 31'21'02" Vest, 107.62 feet to the point of cusp with a tangent 200.00 foot radius curve, coace,a Southeasterly; chenca Hortheuterly sod gaaterly al:ag the are of said curve through a central angle of 56'34120" at distsne• of 197.47 foot to the point of tangency with the Smtbaaly line of the Bortheray 18.00 feet of told Section 9; thence atmg geld Southerly line North 87'55'22" Last, -00 feet s cone llortl 55 westerly; tile=* Horcbeasterlyealongt thhee ue of said curveu through am central ay;la of 58'52'50" a. disteace of 205.53 feat; thence tangent to said curve 17orth 29'02'32" tsar 193.03 feet totb oea lortlrsat�lyeelgvagtthe W the beginning Of A foot radius curve, �onuee .outhe"torly; of said curve through a central angle of i 7'39'30" a diatsace of 165.37 feet; thence tangent to acid curve •orth 76'42'02- &�e 465. 33 feet the beLinnlnr, of a tangent 500.00 foot radius curve, _ thence I;orthe"terly along the arc of ■sid cone through, & Central gorth of 17`49'05" a distance of 155.49 feet; tboi tsep sat d come 0o foot red {u• 53 °52'57" East, 535.08 feet to the be ;inning of a tango curve, cmesve Northwesterly having a central angle of 660661538 IS" ecto along a tangent beering of said curve north t5aagl e7GOr se. 41.3OS" ,sat the THE porn Or BEGI11ND1G; 8b 160.70 feat; thence l ,'orth 58'31103" Vest, 631.64 feat; thence north 01'30'43" !Feat 61.75 feet; thence mrth 50'06'43" Vest, 255.48 fast, more or less, to it centerline of the existing waterline easement granted to the Olivenhain Nuniepnl Water District; thence North along s2id centerline to a point, said point being 30 feet North of he South line of Government Survey t Lot the South line of Wd thence ot 7 and sGovernmentLot 6 of said Section 4to the East line of Section 5, Township .3 South, Range 3 West, SEM. State of c erIA Csw�i of S-4 0/,F4 0 1 all 0. C.4ill�-Jl I% lk w4w%4&* a Nolory PAk In and (w uW Cemaly mW Rall, petwailr ,e . wv� DGITBIT "W — ---- ----- — r AGREEMENT TO RESCIND AGREEMt.x *r TO CONVEY EASEMENT G • •s THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this J day of JCL.. cl /-�^, 19(13, by and between CHARLES W. FROEHLICH, in. , and MILLICENT D. FROEHLICH, husband and wife; DANIEL A. GRANT and VIRGINli. RAKER GRANT• husband and wife; EMILE OHHAN, a widow; CALVIN L. FOSS and LUCILLE FOSS. I.usband and wife, NOR\L\N HERK and LUCY J. BERK, husband and wire; HYRON F. WHITE and MURIEL S. WHITE, husband and wife; and PAUL A. PETERSON and CYNTHIA DAVIS PETERSON, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as First Parties j and NATHAN E. CARL and aTABOARET E. CARL, husband and wife, here- ' inaftcr referred to as Second Parties. WITNESSETH: WHEiiEAS, all parties hereto entered into an agreement to convey easement dated July 18, 1063, concerning the following described real estate i to the County of San Diego, State of California, a .d described as: , Tne Northeast Q„anc :• of Section. 8, Township 13 South, Range 3 West , San Bernardino Meridian, according to the United States Government Sarvey approved November 19, l 1880. WHEREP.S, sail agreement was recorded at the office of 0 ' County Recorder of San Diego Caumy,R,ly 2 -0, 10(13, File•M120003, Ronk 1963, 1Cli,:.t::AS, ao easemc:as have bzen conveyed pursuant to said ..Lreemen'. the parties 6,.rr:o desire to rescind said agreement, v)w, TIIEREFO @e, 1• ..nd in consideration of the premises and j !.juju,; the Is.rti,s ce"eta all said p:u•ties hereby rescind said i :,grec ... em f.a'e• w 18th day of Jily, L063, :.y acJ between all parties here - I 1 . i said aGreetccat Lcing recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San I)icgc. County on J Ay 24, 1063, File 4120098, Book ::r:,3. j 1 i i I This agreement 413'1 LW b4ndir-9 upon the heirs, succ,"4,j'u and assigns o,' all of the Parties herein. IS WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties h"ve- hereto set their ll:,ncld the d:0- and year first abovi. written. Charles W. ]*'rn.]..:vji, Jr. \—!jjj,,,rj D. �Fvuehli•h T . -lx. Gra'-- � Virsinia linker Grant First Parties ITW. I i.. {: I I ST,'.TE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF 0. January 26.1964 bd".a +-. pbu, C..." ud Sulu CARL 'Ind IM.W.W .EviWNd WiTNESS., (S-1) E -iI. -7 F'..:' Luc• -j. 1w: Second_ Dallies—• - 77ATI OF COUNTY 0 California bow. Ki.ad1. mZf PAU i. i...4 G"ft I" Swc fietereaft Sn A3 Cynr �I Nlargare'-(J.- C--11 I 3 This his ugrecutent shall tic ninding upon the heirs, successors And nss!gns of all of the Paz-ties hervi.). IN WITNESS WIjEIIE0F. -.tic 1'"mics have hereto got their hands the day and year first above written. Charles W. Froehlich, Jr. Millivent D. Froehlich _6,_iFi77 Grant Vir-.I;:;a )S:.::cr Grant First Parties Emilie Orlzi.n Calv::. L. Fa" .- act... 70—.,— Lucy .1. Beck Bvro, P'�'J.%. PC.'Q1 6on 1ja%is ileterson ----------- Nathan 1'. C.:rl _.—Lorid— _11artits Sown �c I Margret 1% Carl cou= 0010 .L Denver MA" F.N. IN xa 1W ..j C.0, wi SM* pp"ML WA./6" fk. -SS .4 St. Si This agrcern,11% ::hall I,u 1,;ndi..9 upon the heirs, successus'6 4 assigns of all a' the Parties hereto. r,t!s IN WITNESb WWWOF, the parties have h,,,Lo Set 'lle'r hul- the day and year Rrst shove written. h; los vro"1111ch, Jr. .NI4jIivQ.jL D. Froehlich D,r.iz!l A. Grant Virgiai:, IJakar Grant First Parties C7. -Lucy .1. 13crk Tya—vi., '. :erson ----------- Nathan E. C.'-I*l MDMM" ACDW�wt+^ Margaret E. Carl STATS OF CALWORIVA c=x" Of 0. 1963 Ptak 1• •4 1W "W C-01 rtes w miss tMESS cl, IV67 J::.. This agreement shall be binding upon the hairs, succ,-ssatls and assigns of all u.f the Parties hereto. IN %%ITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have he••eto set their h4nds the dn• and year first above written. Millicent U. Froehlich D,ntel A. Grant VirgWa Hak,!:* Grarl Firm Parties Te OL'biel Car% Fuse T L.. Norman Ouck Lucy J. Berk Byron F. White -Paul A. Pc-,Z•son ijavis Peterhu,, ----------- Nathan 1".. Carl .Second Parties- Margaret E�. Carl STA" W CAUPMOMIA COUN" OP —S.mirl IDI.c,go w I.ts C...4 Df; CzTvfn-V—.V iVind Lucile Foss n This agreunicat sh411 he binding ulmn the heirs, suvc--s- rs and assigns of all of the Parties hereto. IN' I.-ITNESS 11'HERL017. the Parties have hereto set 11it-it hands ihe day and year first above written. Charles W. Fro011ic-h, Jr. Milliven, D. Froehlich D,niel A. Grant Virginia Baker Oraal First Parties Emilie 00-1i Calvin.:.. Fos., Lucilk Fos. Xa.-, Byron F. While ----------- Nathan E. Ca•— argaret E. Carl STATE Of CALP(NIMIA m coalm of San Diero 0, HWFVA&M, OW fm -NIC-08 ".A.Abw 4. 1k. WITNESS -d 006" A F. 01A This agreement shall j,u uj:041 heirs, successors and assigns of all of the Parties hereto. IN %%,I-vESS WIIEIIEOF, the hvve hereto set their hands the day and year first above written. rh:,•Ies V,'. Froclaieh, Jr. millicent D. Froc-Mich D-,r.ici A. Gram. G•an; First Parties Lucille Foss Nor=un Hcr� v A. It( I :-e: 7t rT-T� =-Z-v 1 --1 C, C I Nathan 1, Carl SILund I'"rties Margarct E. Carl OF CALIFORNIA COUHTT IF ft S2n Diego 0. October ud r«.•ffy -pp--= Bywa-F. White and MurieLS --- Whts U1. -t-A&W L-2 I ijj I'L."O 'Chia agreement shall be upon the heirs, successors and assigns of at! of the Parties herew. 1-%' %A,'lTNFSS WHEREOF, .hv l•j.rjjt-.4 have hereto set their hinds :he day and year first above written. First Parties Chirlua %%• VIvAlich, Jr. Emilie Orhu:; .17. L. wA Lucille Pose 70=4.1 isel A L,cy J. I;vtlk ry.11. h Xatha% E. (;,.l STATI OF KCAUPOMIA COO" op San Diego .. ............... a., p•wf P•U 6 -W fm Ow C'"N • ba"n"I's-l" . A r ake Grant - b.4.d vat Awl TA It Y hj "W -11 Iva 24. IM IZ" GRANT OF RIGHT OF WAY Tars R. GAIT, a 21r4le aan . as Qn w, rev W 4 9en. reeea of to we «Ow belly W atYr "%Wde DwAderadr "W y OLITi'ZAI!I MMICITAL WATER DISTRICT, o r,- Ir1Va1 water dl:triot, 4- 011"Cd Std ralstLa{ girder the MWACIpal ➢atwr Diat :et get of Sg15, p aawgN w GretleR atatYd "Mur°I amby &,.b4 pd. 4 ►war Ow r ..L DL.VMIII MDRICIML VAM DISTRICT he ►,wwear W aa94r• u rremer «.4Y d wy 2O. DO . raf ie eW M wrr, e.w, wAw. W 99999 dr Orb rdwf W ivMr. r mt[ wrrw4 ew.rrw4 arpr► rMk diamblM ra W A Pbr"w er 1494,. W wp W i awre... Oe114n .iM Mir .mrrr dr.aa - •rawt.eeeaw Yawfaa ar m tewlwd w evoe d w eaelr C. paw raweeleem .e1 ..wiex r w d Iaerir W aw.". rrek AM& mead pdff W Mew.M dewiw Agee d ar r Garr a" w I 4ea wa.eelaet W sm wy hew e9ai w a9r, we.lae rip me row d yew deem eN 9111 &M b. Md. r rd w dd rixm d ..y e}sa w y etmw M godr 4aW lech wa y e pWFal rrr w rewe9. eA rM Ade b elur aed tw* dew.W hj oar" hew aydwiea WIANP Md rweav9a f . ri 1.4 V ea" w'r e...n.9w «.1+9 «+ar. srfar �.wd,rt wrarM w M Cara « San DI, 3re9 d CaMmew, w m r.rhewl.ry deeaid The South Ralf of the S,,t,wlt Qeart►r,5rct lao 4, 7evn_hlp 1, Sauth, P, -3 7 We it, Sar. &rnartl Sno Nerldts•„ 1•. the ^snt7 o Sar. SSeeo, State Of Ca11'o.•.4a, e_cordln6 to Drelted Stetee Oosvrx..t &d'reY. approved !7rrerDer 19, 1"o, ZO'd d9b =Z1 66- 9Z -7z>0 TM saws vas of .Y o of A& d way Y se tfsnma I bpi Is "A-a v - . ft, - 1 Chi Boticnlna at 4 point on the South lice of gild 7tetlon 4t Township 1) ]ostPt Range T i/est, 214tont thereon :arth 88042 -170 wcot r+8,79 feet from the South. east corner of the Southwest *wsrtsr of Us 8outhwst Qtsrter of said Seetion 4; tt.en:e Borth 51126.16. gegt . lt4.Op feet. . L. Gar d A1.4. � i. ~ w rrwt w prdl w F ew.ww w aoreastl •eT Liit w .}w elteastw, Fyas wry tees OF w to w W sy wd w .A, dtbi. t►e BMW of sold ftk d eel. Ciro. iJ ►..e we. A#U w nK d.M.w r we µ.as 2. d Gin. vk" w oeso w .bd bwohw era sow ter w waste. W we ra w/ a w1 tier ..s yr te.w sd b.a►.bwe.w in w j Is lie w Ad be a.. , fw At a.. 1.4 aaw: uh ..tie d a. >idw keno f erww.t. de eisM w n". • wd dp die erewnt Y ." w M "M Yie2 e.µ/ C aW4 w ie Cnntre. Cneeae .pen"r. edw nawwras . ..a Jrf be Probe w a,An w em sow •trip e: Yew by Ctwio.. ..,w de P.....ioa oe- .t ree.o... It 4 J. e.S m a..l +Pad by Je W" Owe A.t t4 C ni/A AA sot {.etas w itdaw w Pwµ w to w iwreat Ae e.Ywt pewd aweair d tN dw. i.e6ad rttlw d .at. Caking so 16 Aw. 11: ie..r b w..+e4.+M..t A. Pw.w .riot+ die 30 Yt1osoa ib.r f. de Ctav �L._.._ eeteNei et.w Pn..4 t►i.__ Jq d L )1�1 Utcu%w is de P. MW NO, 133Y- 4- 112..t, -(Q_ DRAWN BY dTS . CPECEF13 BY JIM T INEWO - 55 DATE 6-o t -MTV £O'd d9V :Z1 66- 9Z -3::>0 VO'd VT"4" row 2+q: a+aR a 71.b � •' .IVn Fab r w 1. A...+ C.." .b bra ai wwi.\ r ..w l--71 +r1 - -- " •YA..aar r.br.• Wbb .._.� ` ad ab...Aawr►___rrtiwl .ar r� _ - f -�.\ -• {..- 1% ,1r..a w g W r Wtlw WAb..J i 4. of b Y.w \W YA.• .w..f Y /Mj I u.\- `�wcc�. —_ Yw a.rr r... Y. N. waYl .� Mir wM1.w.Yb W V.. bow bM r aYww /wr r rr w...~w1 My1r.. Yha.wYrrMWa %w.r. M \ latl wf Y I.b.'. �. Y..nFr• rr \ . twL.fMY r. arr.I m L;Aa POW : U-IM7.aW rr ry" C� r ow. -d&, '(y.„JIY •, .. •. A�af bn�r rw rYbfrr__.►r rr-- (.L____a\r.6J r.t. ., rlb►Y.br.r+w.Yw nnl iaaniu;�: ��, a�rl�w ,�.11ti�3 ! ly6t' fKM {)700[ 1/P7 aNM .b.a C � d Y a t 4 • Pow h►i Y ...i Y. Y W ••+..f r !.. may a.rr4 qr t ° p •. C...w.�.. - .Y.rkuL ..w.t..rr.r►Y...�.r .r.r v. uApd %. Rbl� Aar. 1 •.t r.�. r � a.d r .1\..i w .11.rl rJ b M �.! r• Y i. a✓Y.r fr rra ...i i dLb =ZL 66- 92-4DO ROW591 RIGHT OF WAY 9 :4«5 5 Vag lM"fre Z. Eoons tad Fran"@ Me Boon. -- IwAaefw"W *A'Oreasit 4 W In emiddmWOa d the a® of C. Do11w, and e,thar eale,a►4 excels"" f"dp "%rt Is b-67 eebm"W" to %wt* plate s the @an D%ga Oe. a Elwalc fompanr. • mrporadea, IN aaaasrae+ ad "dome b mAW a" •a'Oeaasa' da risks, .ae'1 and 9dA4n of ptedcg, awing, caysaesag. lip" r.Fiaasg...%.slier rM Uk& a @a14 M 1w" vita afr" evpnded the,.. and all nw..wt, and popw rtaa, @"horn^ aoaauav, heeae, said edam, Oxman lop w be rmnan.oe th ..tdd, at to loc.tlon, and dte.d„tu upon, .10.1 and (near the hm6af ee s,e,n4e,d It& of anal' " Onntae mar one W b"an" deem eon.mlmt and n.cawrr Ire@ tuna M da, far In W- -dnla oas l"rbatla M alartrWry Is en Volinwa foe suckie 1r roar be ..ad. tofrth.. ehh th. it* d 61— tbararo and apt IYIMraq Is ated .loot wed IW, new and anon the Grantor'. tend .1w.t. In the Counts M - bat Diego - —• - - -- state N Ces,.La, and mw. p.nituterly d.arlbtd.. lolloea: The S} of Seotlon tee Township 13 South, Range 3 Wear, San Bernardino Yerldian; and the N} of the NO of Section 9e Toweshlp 13 South, Range 3 west, San Bernardtno Meridian, U (j I,`, � JMI I 0 � v The route of add line e.1 pei,, and trite. aaau.al4 Mad than be u snaea: Beginning at a point cm, the 'asaterly line of said Ssation 4, distant thereon 55.34 feet Northerly from the Southwest corner thereof) thence froe said point of beginning Sout1 890 301 34" Seat a distance of 283.0,9 fast= thence South 89" 215 34" East along a line parall.l with and A.0 feat Northerly from the South line c.f amid Section 4, a distance of 2408.67 feet to a point hereinafter lcoown as Point "A "1 thence cuntinuing South 89" 211 34" East to the Bast line of said Seotion 4. Alsot Beglnning at amid Point "A "( thence South 6. 10' 34- Past a distance of 226.18 feet. . It is further understood and agreed by the parties bersto, thct the Grantor brain, their successors or assigns shall not dig or drill cr permit to be dug or drilled any wall or wells, within the limits of the above described right of way. !1 :t it understood and agreed by the, 01 4-2 Mr"o Net tba right a( eey bard^ tnnwy.d that' he 12 fat in NNdth, b,' 6 wet meaaortd at dah, aywa on aacb aid. of the "bma d"orlbd rows d said line of poles end a e. It i. also undnnond end eat" H the percha hwno the, the Grantw mar place, nwt and maintain, on the land. 01 the Gramm adjacent to tM awese de cr bee light of en, tort "tboeea as may he nectat"q to Wo jy any the po..r pose tiny erected over aid dlh, a soy, The Otantw Is elan heesbl paved tb rtgb to elm any a' along a Wfaa" in sold a- I pole and etrca ehea. tan .oaid ... d bl II ....awry I. W peen aprr.d. and .w a( tW ri brta bn.br pats.. In 101m,00 1114rr1af, the Cantor_ "watad viewat at"enu d4 X� ter d-- F."..atd in 'he ✓aprw d: W lava.@ � ORAWN BY W haw" CHECKED BY SKETCH NO1 -,j,9 NOTARIRS —U@R rROFZR FORM ON RACK. 2 � � , CC cc � � ) )% � E | k. ! |/ |, 2; H !} 2} } ' ;3 �|()i i• ;8 ��) ; RIGHT OF WAY § |! |]q| ] Frimces ■e i| � § } TO . } SAN DIEGO ELECTRIC �f■. _ )�k�lIL� ® 6 g |4�' .2¥» \�{ g � ; ■� .' . • �Tw � %•2. .!. E ) )% � E | k. ! |/ |, 2; H !} 2} } ' ;3 �|()i ;8 ' ; RIGHT OF WAY § Frimces i| � § } TO . } SAN DIEGO ELECTRIC �f■. _ � ® 6 g .2¥» \�{ g ■ ;8 ' ; RIGHT OF WAY § Frimces i| � § } TO . } SAN DIEGO ELECTRIC c � ® 6 g .2¥» \�{ g ■ Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Wed Nov 24 10:49:18 1999 - -- R0^ n 5--- - - - - -- PROJECT: C: \WINDOWS \Desktop \786DAN.pro - ------------------------ - - - - -- CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 121 � 0 +00.00 1968801.646 6269933.227 S88 °57'59 "E 452.41 ' 20 PC 4 +52.41 1968793.485 6270385.563 Center Point: Radius: Delta: Arc Length: Chord Bearing: Chord Length: Middle Ordinate: External: Deg of Curvature: Tangent: Curve PI: 369 Center Point: Radius: Delta: Arc Length: Chord Bearing: Chord Length: Middle Ordinate: External: Deg of Curvature: Tangent: Curve PI: 18 PT N32009132 "E 62.61 75 N32- 09132 "E 5.43 ' 74 N32009132 11E 124.79 ' 68 PC Center Point: Radius: Delta: Arc Length: Chord Bearing: Chord Length: Middle Ordinate: 19 1968993.452 200.00 ' 24029141" Left 85.50 ' N78 °47'11 "E 84.85 ' 4.55 ' 4.66 ' 28038152" Arc Definition 43.41 ' 1968792.702 5 +37.92 1968809.985 19 1968993.451 200.00 ' 34022148" Left 120.01 ' N49020'56 "E 118.22 8.93 9.35 28038'52" Arc Definition 61.87 ' 6270389.171 RP 1 6270428.574 6270468.793 6270389.168 RP 1968834.619 6270525.556 6 +57.92 1968887.000 6270558.485 7 +20.54 1968940.004 6270591.811 7 +25.96 1968944.601 6270594.701 8 +50.76 1969050.245 67 1968943.791 200.00 ' 47038'04" Right 166.28 ' N55058'34 "E 161.53 ' 17.03 ' 6270661.123 6270830.438 RP Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Wed Nov 24 10:49:18 1999 PROJECT: C: \WINDOWS \Desktop \786DAN.pro ------------------------------------------------- --- --- ------ ------ --- - - - - -- External: 18.62 ' Deg of Curvature: 28038152" Arc Definition Tangent: 88.28 ' Curve PI: 1969124.983 6270708.118 64 PT 10 +17.03 1969140.627 6270795.000 N79 °47'36 "E 157.66 ' 65 11 +74.69 1969168.564 6270950.165 92.46 3 4 RCE22203 N79 °47'36 "E 308.17 ' 66 14 +82.86 1969223.172 6271253.458 97.93 3 4 RCE22203 S79 °47136 "W 308.17 ' 65 17 +91.02 1969168.564 6270950.165 92.46 3 4 RCE22203 S79 °47'36 "W 157.66 ' 64 PT 19 +48.68 1969140.627 6270795.000 Center Point: 67 1968943.792 6270830.440 RP Radius: 200.00 ' Delta: 47 038'04" Left Arc Length: 166.28 ' Chord Bearing: S55058134 11W Chord Length: 161.53 ' Middle Ordinate: 17.03 ' External: 18.62 ' Deg of Curvature: 28038152" Arc Definition Tangent: 88.28 ' Curve PI: 1969124.983 6270708.118 68 PC 21 +14.96 1969050.245 6270661.123 S32009'32 "W 192.83 ' 18 PT 23 +07.79 1968887.000 6270558.485 Center Point: 19 1968993.454 6270389.170 RP Radius: 200.00 ' Delta: 58052129" Right Arc Length: 205.51 Chord Bearing: S61 °35147 "W Chord Length: 196.59 Middle Ordinate: 25.82 External: 29.65 ' Deg of Curvature: 28038152" Arc Definition Tangent: 112.87 ' Curve PI: 1968791.449 6270498.414 20 PC 25 +13.30 1968793.486 6270385.561 N88057159 "W 452.41 ' 121 29 +65.71 1968801.647 6269933.225 Closing latitude = 0.00126 Closing departure = - 0.00170 Closing bearing = S53025'15 "E Closing distance = 0.00212 Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Wed Nov 24 10:49:18 1999 PROJECT: C: \WINDOWS \Desktop \786DAN.pro Total traverse length = 2944.86 (2965.71) Total error of closure = 1/1387951 Error of closure in latitute - 1/2329034 Error of closure in departure = 1/1728386 Area = 0.00 SF Area = 0.00 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:52:43 1999 -- PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro �PA1)' P/?U• j PveLIC ------------------------------------ CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance 207 " 0 +00.00 1968808.945 6270526.495 N88 °57159 "W 140.63 ' 54 1 +40.63 1968811.482 6270385.888 N88 057159 "W 452.10 ' 51" 5 +92.72 1968819.637 6269933.862 NO2 002146 11E 12.00 ' 15 v 6 +04.72 1968831.630 6269934.290 S88 057159 11E 451.88 ' 26 10 +56.61 1968823.478 6270386.097 Center Point: 19 1968993.451 6270389.163 RP Radius: 170.00 ' Delta: 58052129" Left Arc Length: 174.68 ' Chord Bearing: N61 035147 11E Chord Length: 167.10 ' Middle Ordinate: 21.95 ' External: 25.20 ' Deg of Curvature: 33042112" Arc Definition Tangent: 95.94 ' Curve PI: 1968821.749 6270482.028 16 12 +31.29 1968902.964 6270533.081 N32 °09'32 "E 29.12 ' 22 ' 12 +60.41 1968927.617 6270548.581 Center Point: 23 1968938.259 6270531.647 Radius: 20.00 ' Delta: 89 °59124" Left Arc Length: 31.41 ' Chord Bearing: N12 050146 "W Chord Length: 28.28 ' Middle Ordinate: 5.86 ' External: 8.28 ' Deg of Curvature: 286028144" Arc Definition Tangent: 20.00 ' Curve PI: 1968944.548 6270559.232 24 12 +91.82 1968955.189 6270542.293 N57051104 11W 19.13 ' 25 13 +10.95 1968965.368 6270526.096 Center Point: 1007 1969230.770 6270692.963 Radius: 313.50 ' Delta: 63018'36" Right V Arc Length: Chord Bearing: Chord Length: Middle Ordinate: External: Deg of Curvature: Tangent: Curve PI: 1008 N05-28 '0911E 46.97 ' 1010 NOS-28'09"E 132.00 ' 1001 Center Point: Radius: Delta: Arc Length: Chord Bearing: Chord Length: Middle Ordinate: External: Deg of Curvature: Tangent: Curve PI: 1009, N88 042110 "W 430.33 ' 1005 NO2 °02146 "E 30.00 ' 52 S88 °42110 "E 652.56 ' 895' 2 "IP W /Dsc. LS #9571 S01 °40'44 "W 30.00 ' 30 N88 °42110 11W 172.84 ' 29 Center Point: Radius: Delta: Arc Length: Chord Bearing: Chord Length: Middle Ordinate: External: Deg of Curvature: Tangent: Curve PI: 27 505028'09 "W 183.64 Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:52:43 1999 PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro ------- -------------------------------- 346.41 ' N26 011'10 "W 329.05 ' 46.64 ' 54.79 ' 18 016'34" Arc Definition 193.28 ' 1969068.248 16 +57.36 1969260.646 17 +04.33 1969307.402 18 +36.33 1969438.802 1000 1969440.565 18.50 ' 70056123" Left 22.91 ' N30 000'05 "W 21.47 ' 3.43 ' 4.22 ' 309042125" Arc Definition 13.18 ' 1969451.927 18 +59.23 1969457.395 22 +89.57 1969467.137 6270362.481 6270380.890 6270385.367 6270397.948 6270379.532 6270399.216 6270387.213 6269956.993 23 +19.57 1969497.118 6269958.064 29 +72.13 1969482.345 6270610.457 30 +02.13 1969452.358 6270609.578 31 +74.97 1969456.270 6270436.782 28 1969439.110 6270443.693 18.50 ' 62035148" Left 20.21 ' S36046'03 "W 19.22 ' 2.69 ' 3.15 ' 309042125" Arc Definition 11.25 ' 1969452.076 6270426.354 31 +95.19 1969440.874 6270425 -278 477.78 IP Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:52:43 1999 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro 48 33 +78.83 1969258.070 6270407.775 Center Point: 1007 1969230.764 6270692.971 Radius: 286.50 ' Delta: 63 °18136" Left Arc Length: 316.57 ' Chord Bearing: S26 011110 "E Chord Length: 300.71 ' Middle Ordinate: 42.62 ' External: 50.07 ' Deg of Curvature: 19 059155" Arc Definition Tangent: 176.64 ' Curve PI: 1969082.245 6270390.945 49 36 +95.40 1968988.223 6270540.475 S57 °51104 11E 19.13 ' 31 37 +14.53 1968978.044 6270556.671 Center Point: 32 1968994.975 6270567.317 Radius: 20.00 ' Delta: 90 000'36" Left Are Length: 31.42 ' Chord Bearing: N77 009'14 "E Chord Length: 28.29 ' Middle Ordinate: 5.86 ' External: 8.29 ' Deg of Curvature: 286 028144" Arc Definition Tangent: 20.00 ' Curve PI: 1968967.402 6270573.609 33 37 +45.95 1968984.333 6270584.253 N32 °09'32 "E 22.89 ' 206 37 +68.83 1969003.712 6270596.437 SO1 °40144 "W 118.31 ' 2087 38 +87.15 1968885.452 6270592.971 S32 012118 11W 17.04 ' 2095 39 +04.19 1968871.034 6270583.889 Center Point: 19 1968993.456 6270389.177 RP Radius: 230.00 ' Delta: 21 010'56" Right Arc Length: 85.03 ' Chord Bearing: S42 045100 11W Chord Length: 84.55 ' Middle Ordinate: 3.92 ' External: 3.99 ' Deg of Curvature: 24 054140" Arc Definition Tangent: 43.01 ' Curve PI: 1968834.622 6270560.995 207 39 +89.22 1968808.947 6270526.497 Closing latitude = 0.00198 Closing departure = 0.00132 Closing bearing = S33 °46'15 "W Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:52:43 1999 PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- - - - - -- Closing distance = 0.00238 Total traverse length = 3939.24 (3989.22) Total error of closure = 1/1657834 Error of closure in latitute = 1/1994346 Error of closure in departure - 1/2982394 Area = 52454.97 SF Area = 1.20 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Wed Nov 24 11:46:37 1999 brtw smcg PROJECT: C: \WINDOWS \Desktop \786DAN.pro CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Basting Elevation Bearing Distance 79 t? 0 +00.00 1969180.213 6270601.609 S65 001'42 11W 68.07 1 80 CQ 0 +68.07 1969151.476 6270539.903 S79 °19'16 11W 41.51 ' 92 t S 1 +09.58 1969143.784 6270499.112 N76036'2911W 45.80 ' 93 1 1 +55.38 1969154.392 6270454.557 N36039'02 "W 34.01 ' L� 94 , 1 +89.40 1969181.678 6270434.255 S89042'22 "W 8.86,1 t7 95 1 +98.26 1969181.633 6270425.395 S19 °2714511E 72.90' is 96 2 +71.16 1969112.898 6270449.685 S29021' 1211E 38.62' L9 97 3 +09.77 1969079.236 6270468.616 S38 033'59 "E 62.20'1 110 98 3 +71.97 1969030.603 6270507.393 N88041141 11E 37.94'- 01 99 4 +09.91 1969031.467 6270545.323 N63034'17 "E 58.86 ' tiz 100 4 +68.77 1969057.665 6270598.032 N01040'44 "E 122.59 1 Ctr F 79 5 +91.36 1969180.202 6270601.623 - ------------------------------- Closing latitude - — -- ---------- - 0.01118 -------- - ----- — ----------- -- — — - Closing departure = 0.01404 Closing bearing - N51028'31 "W Closing distance = 0.01795 Total traverse length - 591.36 (591.36) Total error of closure . 1/32946 Error of closure in latitute = 1/52896 Error of closure in departure - 1/42113 Area = 16440.38 SF Area = 0.38 AC i Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Wed Nov 24 11:46:37 1999 ()p&V fRF &' PROJECT: C: \WINDOWS \Desktop \786DAN.pro CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance 34 0 +00.00 1969463.347 6270124.589 N88 °42'10 "W 167.63 ' 384 1 +67.63 1969467.142 6269957.002 S02 °02146 "W 395.65 91 5 +63.28 1969071.744 6269942.876 S86 050'18 "E 150.31 ' ✓ 90 7 +13.59 1969063.454 6270092.957 S73 °49'16 "E 105.39 '.e 89 8 +18.98 1969034.088 6270194.173 S87 °02133 11E 49.17 ' 88 8 +68.15 1969031.551 6270243.277 S77 °34143 11E 129.21 87 9 +97.36 1969003.758 6270369.463 N78 °35125 "E 74.47 86 10 +71.83 1969018.490 6270442.461 N37 036'37 "W 79.30 84 11 +51.13 1969081.310 6270394.065 N68 °43156 "W 84.17 83 12 +35.31 1969111.841 6270315.628 N57 °53'10 "W 131.67 '/ 82 13 +66.98 1969181.837 6270204.104 N84 055120 "W 78.43 'e 81 14 +45.41 1969188.779 6270125.982 f, N09-41-56-'E 108.93 78 15 +54.34 1969296.152 6270144.334 S86 024'33 "W 19.39 ^ 77 15 +73.73 1969294.937 6270124.982 N04 °56'11 "E 98.14 ' 76 / 16 +71.87 1969392.713 6270133.426 N07 °07139 "W 71.18 ' 34 17 +43.05 1969463.343 6270124.595 Closing latitude = - 0.00339 Closing departure = 0.00582 Closing bearing = N59 °46'52 "W Closing distance = 0.00673 Total traverse length = 1743.04 (1743.05) Total error of closure = 1/258953 Error of closure in latitute = 1/514504 Error of closure in departure = 1/299677 Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Wed Nov 24 11:46:37 1999 PROJECT: C: \WINDOWS \Desktop \786DAN.pro T Area = 105032.92 SF Area = 2.41 AC I Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:39:51 1999 AIMrW Arne L /n.E PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing ---------------------------- Distance ------------------------------------------- 897 0 +00.00 1969497.691 6269933.093 417.34 � S88 °42'10 "E 24.99 ' 52 0 +24.99 1969497.125 6269958.077 S88 042'10 "E " 268.55 ' 858 458.19 2 +93.53 1969491.046 6270226.558 441.47 S88 042'10 "E - 189.61 ' 1028 4 +83.14 1969486.753 6270416.120 S88 °42'10 "E 194.40 ' 895 6 +77.55 1969482.352 6270610.470 477.78 2 "IP W /DSc. LS #9571 NOTE: The set is not closed. Closing latitude Closing departure Closing bearing Closing distance Total traverse length Total error of closure Error of closure in latitute Error of closure in departure Area Area -------------------- _ - 15.33696 = 677.37635 = N88 042'10 "W = 677.55000 = 677.55 (677.55) 1/1 1/44 1/1 = 5195.25 SF = 0.12 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:39:50 1999 fooiNlRLt /� /�! PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro ------------ - - - - -- N------ - - - - -- ---------------------- - - - - -- CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Bearing Distance 50 2 IP 26525 S88 °57159 "E 656.93 ' 51 S88 °57159 "E 11 452.10 ' 54 NOTE: The set is not closed. Closing latitude Closing departure Closing bearing Closing distance Total traverse length Total error of closure Error of closure in latitute Error of closure in departure Area Area Station Northing Easting Elevation -- --------------------------------- 0 +00.00 1968831.487 6269277.045 6 +56.93 1968819.637 6269933.868 11 +09.03 1968811.482 6270385.894 _ - 20.00572 = 1108.84954 = N88 °57'59 "W = 1109.03000 = 1109.03 (1109.03) = 1/0 = 1/55 = 1/1 = 11091.54 SF = 0.25 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 10:04:52 1999 �� � 4 - - -- -- i�� ----------------------------------------------------------- PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 " 0 +00.00 1968831.631 6269934.298 S88 057159 "E 451.88 ' 26 - 4 +51.88 1968823.480 6270386.104 Center Point: 19 1968993.452 6270389.171 RP Radius: 170.00 ' Delta: 58 052129" Left Arc Length: 174.68 ' Chord Bearing: N61 °35147 "E Chord Length: 167.10 ' Middle Ordinate: 21.95 ' External: 25.20 ' Deg of Curvature: 33 042112" Arc Definition Tangent: 95.94 ' Curve PI: 1968821.749 6270482.028 16' 6 +26.57 1968902.966 6270533.089 N32 °09132 11E 29.12 ' 22 6 +55.69 1968927.618 6270548.588 Center Point: 23 1968938.261 6270531.655 Radius: 20.00 ' Delta: 89 °59124" Left - Arc Length: 31.41 ' Chord Bearing: N12 050146 11W Chord Length: 28.28 ' Middle Ordinate: 5.86 ' External: 8.28 ' Deg of Curvature: 286 °28144" Arc Definition Tangent: 20.00 ' Curve PI: 1968944.548 6270559.232 24 6 +87.10 1968955.190 6270542.301 N57 °51'04 "W 19.13 ' 25, 7 +06.23 1968965.370 6270526.104 Center Point: 1007 1969230.771 6270692.970 Radius: 313.50 ' Delta: 3 °46'27" Right Arc Length: 20.65 ' Chord Bearing: N55 °57'14 "W Chord Length: 20.65 ' Middle Ordinate: 0.17 ' External: 0.17 ' Deg of Curvature: 18 °16134" Arc Definition Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 10:04:53 1999 PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro Tangent: 10.33 ' Curve PI: 1968970.868 6270517.364 1020 7 +26.88 1968976.931 6270508.994 S35 °55'59 "W 33.13 ' 1022' 7 +60.01 1968950.105 6270489.552 S64 °00119 11W 44.48 ' 1023' 8 +04.49 1968930.610 6270449.571 N71 040127 11W 150.00 ' 1018, 9 +54.49 1968977.774 6270307.179 N71 °40127 11W 176.11 ' 1017, 11 +30.60 1969033.146 6270140.000 N87 °56122 "W 198.38 ' 1029, 13 +28.98 1969040.279 6269941.749 S02 002'46 "W 208.78 ' 15' 15 +37.76 1968831.632 6269934.294 Closing latitude = 0.00081 Closing departure = - 0.00332 Closing bearing = S76 °14'07 "E Closing distance = 0.00341 Total traverse length = 1527.04 (1537.76) Total error of closure = 1/447357 Error of closure in latitute = 1/1880181 Error of closure in departure = 1/460585 Area = 98510.13 SF Area = 2.26 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 10:04:53 1999 P(I d Nil FnR art 0f/f L PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 207 0 +00.00 1968808.945 6270526.495 S88 057'59 "E 64.21 ' 896 0 +64.21 1968807.787 6270590.695 417.30 LSD LS #4368 in Conc. N01 040'44 "E 77.70 ' 2087 1 +41.91 1968885.453 6270592.971 S32 °12'18 "W 17.04 ' 2095 1 +58.95 1968871.035 6270583.890 Center Point: 19 1968993.457 6270389.178 RP Radius: 230.00 ' Delta: 21 010156" Right Arc Length: 85.03 ' Chord Bearing: S42 °45100 11W Chord Length: 84.55 ' Middle Ordinate: 3.92 ' External: 3.99 ' Deg of Curvature: 24 054'40" Arc Definition Tangent: 43.01 ' Curve PI: 1968634.622 6270560.995 207 2 +43.98 1968808.948 6270526.497 Closing latitude = 0.00306 Closing departure = 0.00193 Closing bearing = S32 °15'09 "W Closing distance = 0.00362 Total traverse length = 243.50 (243.98) Total error of closure = 1/67348 Error of closure in latitute = 1/79636 Error of closure in departure = 1/126203 Area = 2141.21 SF Area = 0.05 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:53:45 1999 4 G O iS PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro - - - - a ------- --- ---------------- --- - - - - -- CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Basting Elevation Bearing Distance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 51 0 +00.00 1968819.637 6269933.869 S88 °57'59 "E 656.93 896 6 +56.93 1968807.787 6270590.692 417.30 L L &D LS #4368 in 6onc. N01 °40144 "E 136.87 ' 74 / 7 +93.80 1968944.598 6270594.702 S32 009132 11W ✓ 5.43 ' 75 7 +99.23 1968940.001 6270591.812 N57 °50128 11W 69.13 ' 1024 8 +68.35 1968976.797 6270533.288 Center Point: 1007 1969230.769 6270692.969 Radius: 300.00 ' Delta: 3 046127" Right Arc Length: 19.76 Chord Bearing: N55 °57114 11W Chord Length: 19.76 ' Middle Ordinate: 0.16 ' External: 0.16 ' Deg of Curvature: 19 005'55" Arc Definition Tangent: 9.88 ' Curve PI: 1968982.060 6270524.926 1025 8 +88.12 1968987.860 6270516.916 S35 °55'59 "W 13.50 ' 1020 / 9 +01.62 1968976.929 6270508.993 S35 055'59 "W 33.13 ' 1022 9 +34.75 1968950.103 6270489.551 S64 °00'19 "W 44.48 1023 9 +79.23 1968930.608 6270449.571 ' N71 °40127 "W 150.00 1018 11 +29.23 1968977.771 6270307.179 N71 °40'27 "W 176.11 ' 1017 13 +05.34 1969033.144 6270140.000 N87 °56122 "W 198.38 1029 15 +03.72 1969040.277 6269941.748 S02 002'46 "W / 220.78 51 17 +24.50 1968819.637 6269933.866 Closing latitude = 0.00041 Closing departure = - 0.00357 Closing bearing = S83 °25'13 "E ., Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:53:45 1999 PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro losing distance = 0.00360 Total traverse length = 1724.50 (1724.50) Total error of closure = 1/479534 Error of closure in latitute = 1/4184954 Error of closure in departure - 1/482713 Area = 117844.45 SF Area = 2.71 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:53:45 1999 3 s s PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro pu L �o ------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance ' ---------------------- 1028 '' ------ ---- -- 0 +00.00 — ----------------------------------- 1969486.753 6270416.112 S05 °28109 11W 180.48 ' 1031 L� 1 +80.48 1969307.094 6270398.911 S05 028'09 "W 47.95 ' 1027 v 2 +28.43 1969259.363 6270394.341 Center Point: Radius: Delta: Arc Length: Chord Bearing: Chord Length: Middle Ordinate: External: Deg of Curvature: Tangent: Curve PI: 1026 S65 005'02 "W 1019 V S40 °00'00 "W 1018 ✓ S71 °40'27 "E 1023 N64 000'19 "E 1022 ✓ N35 °5�'59 "E 1020 N35-55 '59"E 1025 13.50 ' 157.86 ' 150.00 ' 44.48 ' 33.13 ' 13.50 ' Center Point: Radius: Delta: Arc Length: Chord Bearing: Chord Length: Middle Ordinate: External: Deg of Curvature: Tangent: Curve PI: 1007 1969230.770 6270692.975 300.00 ' 30023106" Left 159.10 ' S09 °43'25 "E 157.24 ' 10.48 ' 10.86 ' 19 °05155" Arc Definition 81.47 ' 1969178.268 6270386.577 3 +87.53 1969104.382 6270420.898 4 +01.03 1969098.694 6270408.654 5 +58.88 1968977.766 6270307.184 7 +08.88 1968930.603 6270449.576 7 +53.36 1968950.098 6270489.556 7 +86.49 1968976.924 6270508.998 7 +99.99 1968987.855 6270516.921 1007 1969230.766 6270692.973 300.00 ' 3 °46127" Left 19.76 ' 555057'14 "E 19.76 ' 0.16 ' 0.16 ' 19005155" Arc Definition 9.88 ' 1968982.060 6270524.926 Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:53:45 1999 PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro Area = 112975.97 SF Area = 2.59 AC 1024 8 +19.75 1968976.792 6270533.294 S57 050'28 "E 69.13 ' 75 8 +88.88 1968939.996 6270591.817 N32 °09132 "E 5.43 ' 74 8 +94.31 1968944.593 6270594.708 NO1 040'44 "E 537.99 ' 895 ( 14 +32.29 1969482.352 6270610.470 477.78 211IP W /DSc. LS #9571 N88 042'10 "W 194.40 ' 1028 ✓ 16 +26.69 1969486.753 6270416.119 -- -------- - --- -- — --- — -------- Closing latitude — ----- -- ---- = 0.00043 — - -- - -- — -- -- --------- -- --- --- — -- Closing departure = 0.00725 Closing bearing = S86 °36'08 "W Closing distance = 0.00726 Total traverse length = 1624.85 (1626.69) Total error of closure = 1/223766 Error of closure in latitute = 1/3775454 Error of closure in departure = 1/224160 Area = 112975.97 SF Area = 2.59 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 10:04:53 1999 PCL 3 MAN IV f% PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 0 +00.00 1969452.364 6270609.586 N88 °42'10 "W 172.84 ' 29 / 1 +72.84 1969456.277 6270436.790 Center Point: 28 1969439.116 6270443.701 Radius: 18.50 ' Delta: 62 035148" Left Arc Length: 20.21 ' Chord Bearing: S36 046103 11W Chord Length: 19.22 ' Middle Ordinate: 2.69 ' External: 3.15 ' Deg of Curvature: 309 °42125" Arc Definition Tangent: 11.25 ' Curve PI: 1969452.076 6270426.354 27 1 +93.05 1969440.880 6270425.266 S05 028'09 "W 183.64 ' 48 3 +76.69 1969258.076 6270407.783 Center Point: 1007 1969230.770 6270692.979 Radius: 286.50 ' Delta: 63 018136" Left Arc Length: 316.57 ' Chord Bearing: S26 °11'10 "E Chord Length: 300.71 ' Middle Ordinate: 42.62 ' External: 50.07 ' Deg of Curvature: 19 059155" Arc Definition Tangent: 176.64 ' Curve PI: 1969082.245 6270390.945 49 6 +93.27 1968988.229 6270540.483 S57 °51104 11E 19.13 ' 31 7 +12.39 1968978.050 6270556.679 Center Point: 32 1968994.981 6270567.325 Radius: 20.00 ' Delta: 90 °00136" Left Arc Length: 31.42 ' Chord Bearing: N77 °09114 11E Chord Length: 28.29 ' Middle Ordinate: 5.86 ' External: 8.29 ' Deg of Curvature: 286 028144" Arc Definition Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 10:04:53 1999 PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro Tangent: 20.00 ' Curve PI: 1968967.402 6270573.609 33 7 +43.81 1968984.340 6270584.261 N32009'32 "E 22.89 ' 206 7 +66.70 1969003.718 6270596.445 NO1 °40144 "E 448.84 ' 30 12 +15.54 1969452.365 6270609.595 N88042110 11W 172.84 ' 29 13 +88.39 1969456.278 6270436.799 NOTE: The set is not closed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Closing latitude = 3.91423 Closing departure = - 172.78642 Closing bearing = 588042'08 "E Closing distance = 172.83075 Total traverse length = 1368.40 (1388.39) Total error of closure = 1/7 Error of closure in latitute = 1/349 Error of closure in departure = 1/7 Area = 80475.51 SF Area = 1.85 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 10:04:53 1999 P( 3 Nil `r4,, ;, Ai, PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Basting Elevation Bearing Distance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1019 0 +00.00 1969098.696 6270408.654 S40 000100 11W 157.86 ' 1018 1 +57.86 1968977.769 6270307.184 S71 °40127 "E 150.00 ' 1023 3 +07.86 1968930.606 6270449.576 N64 000119 11E 44.48 ' 1022 3 +52.34 1968950.101 6270489.556 N35 055159 "E 33.13 ' 1020 3 +85.47 1968976.926 6270508.998 Center Point: 1007 1969230.768 6270692.973 Radius: 313.50 ' Delta: 29 009103" Right Arc Length: 159.50 ' Chord Bearing: N39 029129 11W Chord Length: 157.79 ' Middle Ordinate: 10.09 ' External: 10.42 ' Deg of Curvature: 18 016'34" Arc Definition Tangent: 81.52 ' Curve PI: 1969024.767 6270442.996 1019 5 +44.97 1969098.696 6270408.650 ---- ----- ---- --- -- - ----- ------------------------------------------------------- Closing latitude = - 0.00059 Closing departure . - 0.00421 Closing bearing = N82 000'39 "E Closing distance = 0.00425 Total traverse length = 543.26 (544.97) Total error of closure = 1/127720 Error of closure in latitute - 1/918948 Error of closure in departure = 1/128972 Area = 16226.13 SF Area - 0.37 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:53:45 1999 pet z Grz 0 S PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \766.pro ----- - --------------------------------------------------------- CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance 1029 / 0 +00.00 1969040.277 6269941.752 S87 056'22 "E 198.38 ' 1017 / 1 +98.38 1969033.144 6270140.003 S71 °40127 "E 176.11 ' 1018 3 +74.49 1968977.772 6270307.182 N40- 00100 11E 157.86 ' 1019 5 +32.35 1969098.700 6270408.652 N65 005102 11E 13.50 ' 1026 5 +45.85 1969104.387 6270420.896 Center Point: 1007 1969230.774 6270692.973 Radius: 300.00 ' Delta: 30 023'06" Right Arc Length: 159.10 ' Chord Bearing: N09 °43'25 "W Chord Length: 157.24 ' Middle Ordinate: 10.48 ' External: 10.86 ' Deg of Curvature: 19 °05155" Arc Definition Tangent: 61.47 ' Curve PI: 1969178.268 6270386.577 1027 7 +04.95 1969259.368 6270394.338 N05 °28109 11E 47.95 ' 1031 , 7 +52.90 1969307.100 6270398.909 N88 °42'10 "W 13.54 ' 1010 / 7 +66.43 1969307.406 6270385.372 N88 °42'10 "W 244.50 ' 1006 ( 10 +10.93 1969312.942 6270140.935 442.00 S41 °34158 "W 297.42 ' 1030 " 13 +08.35 1969090.472 6269943.537 S02 °02146 "W 50.22 ' 1029 ' 13 +58.58 1969040.284 6269941.744 Closing latitude = 0.00681 Closing departure = - 0.00796 Closing bearing = S49 027'52 "E Closing distance = 0.01047 Total traverse length = 1356.72 (1358.58) Total error of closure = 1/129535 Error of closure in latitute = 1/199310 Error of closure in departure = 1/170440 Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:53:45 1999 PROJECT: HAMy Documents \Tmodel \786.pro ----------------------------------------------------------- ------ --- --- Area = 109027.37 SF Area - 2.50 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 10:04:53 1999 p(- l Z Nf% PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1029 1 0 +00.00 1969040.277 6269941.752 S87 °56'22 "E 198.38 ' 1017 ' 1 +98.38 1969033.144 6270140.003 S71 °40127 11E 176.11 ' 1018 3 +74.49 1968977.772 6270307.182 N40 000'00 11E 157.86 ' 1019 5+32.35 1969098.700 6270408.652 Center Point: 1007 1969230.774 6270692.973 Radius: 313.50 ' Delta: 30 °23106" Right Arc Length: 166.26 ' Chord Bearing: N09 043125 11W Chord Length: 164.31 ' Middle Ordinate: 10.96 ' External: 11.35 ' Deg of Curvature: 18 016134" Arc Definition Tangent: 85.13 ' Curve PI: 1969175.905 6270372.789 1008 6 +98.61 1969260.649 6270380.901 N05 028'09 "E 46.97 ' 1010 ' 7 +45.57 1969307.405 6270385.378 N88 °42110 11W 244.50 ' 1006 9 +90.07 1969312.941 6270140.940 442.00 S41 °34'58 "W 297.42 ' 1030 12 +87.49 1969090.471 6269943.542 S02 °02'46 "W 50.22 ' 1029 13 +37.72 1969040.283 6269941.749 Closing latitude = 0.00574 Closing departure = - 0.00242 Closing bearing = S22 °51'26 "E Closing distance = 0.00623 Total traverse length = 1335.77 (1337.72) Total error of closure = 1/214299 Error of closure in latitute = 1/232561 Error of closure in departure = 1/551698 Area = 106190.55 SF Area = 2.44 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:53:45 1999 PCL k&s55 PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance 1030 0 +00.00 1969090.470 6269943.545 ✓ N41 034158 11E 297.42 ' 1006 / 2 +97.42 1969312.940 6270140.943 442.00 S88 042110 "E ✓ 244.50 ' 1010 5 +41.92 1969307.404 6270385.380 S88 °42'10 "E/ 13.54 ' 1031 5 +55.45 1969307.098 6270398.917 1/ N05 °28'09 "E 180.48 ' 1028 / 7 +35.93 1969486.756 6270416.118 N88042'10 "W 458.16 ' 52 1/ 11 +94.09 1969497.129 6269958.076 S02 °02'46 11W 406.91 ' 1030 16 +01.00 1969090.478 6269943.547 Closing latitude = 0.00777 Closing departure = 0.00270 Closing bearing = S19 °08'02 "W Closing distance = 0.00822 Total traverse length = 1601.01 (1601.00) Total error of closure = 1/194657 Error of closure in latitute = 1/206040 Error of closure in departure = 1/593875 Area = 102977.65 SF Area = 2.36 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 10:04:53 1999 PZ L N E( PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1030 0 +00.00 1969090.470 6269943.545 N41 034158 "E 297.42 ' 1006 2 +97.42 1969312.940 6270140.943 442.00 S88 °42110 11E 244.50 ' 1010 5 +41.92 1969307.404 6270385.380 N05 028109 "£ 132.00 ' 1001 6 +73.92 1969438.804 6270397.961 Center Point: 1000 1969440.567 6270379.545 Radius: 18.50 ' Delta: 70 056'23" Left Arc Length: 22.91 ' Chord Bearing: N30 000'05 11W Chord Length: 21.47 ' Middle Ordinate: 3.43 ' External: 4.22 ' Deg of Curvature: 309042125" Arc Definition Tangent: 13.18 ' Curve PI: 1969451.927 6270399.216 1009 6 +96.83 1969457.397 6270387.225 N88 °42'10 "W 430.33 ' 1005 11 +27.16 1969467.139 6269957.006 S02 °02146 11W 376.91 ' 1030 15 +04.07 1969090.469 6269943.549 -- --- — - — ---- — -- -- ---- --- Closing latitude -- ---- — --------- = - 0.00086 — ------------------------------- Closing departure = 0.00406 Closing bearing = N78 °01'02 "W Closing distance = 0.00415 Total traverse length = 1502.63 (1504.07) Total error of closure = 1/361687 Error of closure in latitute = 1/1742077 Error of closure in departure = 1/369743 Area = 87165.03 SF Area = 2.00 AC . Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Fri Nov 05 09:53:45 1999 Yi 7AC - � f U/j $1a . PROJECT: H: \My Documents \Tmodel \786.pro --- --- ----- �� v- ----- - --- — ------------------------- CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 51 0 +00.00 1968819.637 6269933.869 S88 °57'59 "E 656.93 ' 896 6 +56.93 1968807.787 6270590.692 417.30 L &D LS #4368 in Conc. NO1 040144 11E 674.85 ' 895 13 +31.79 1969482.347 6270610.464 477.78 2 "IP W /Dsc. LS #9571 N88 042110 "W 652.56 ' 52 19 +84.35 1969497.120 6269958.071 S02 002'46 "W 677.92 ' 51 26 +62.27 1968819.633 6269933.867 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Closing latitude = - 0.00457 Closing departure = - 0.00224 Closing bearing = N26 005'45 "E Closing distance = 0.00509 Total traverse length = 2662.26 (2662.27) Total error of closure = 1/523232 Error of closure in latitute = 1/582624 Error of closure in departure = 1/1189510 Area = 442825.44 SF Area = 10.17 AC Wayne A. Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Mon Nov 29 08:53:47 1999 N^ 0 3 PROJECT: C: \WINDOWS \Desktop \786DAN.pro CLOSURE REPORT Coordinate values shown are computed based on the rounded bearing and distance, or chord bearing and chord lengths as indicated herein. Boundary Name: Point Number Description Station Northing Easting Elevation Bearing Distance 120 0 +00.00 1974203.203 6271990.104 S39 °53'39 "W 1533.18 ' 119 15 +33.18 1973026.901 6271006.766 729.91 S16 °32148 "W 3682.26 ' 52 52 +15.44 1969497.130 6269958.072 S88 042110 "E 652.56 ' 895 58 +68.00 1969482.357 6270610.465 477.78 211IP W /DSc. LS #9571 N06 °22146 11E 3566.63 119 94 +34.64 1973026.902 6271006.762 729.91 N39 053'39 "E 1533.18 ' 120 109 +67.82 1974203.204 6271990.100 Closing latitude = 0.00108 Closing departure = - 0.00407 Closing bearing = S75 009'15 "E Closing distance = 0.00421 Total traverse length = 10967.81 (10967.82) Total error of closure = 1/2602264 Error of closure in latitute = 1/10156359 Error of closure in departure = 1/2692132 Area = 1159146.29 SF Area = 26.61 AC License Detail wysiwyg: // 15/http: / /www2.csib ea4g ... License+Detail.DML ?LicNum= ++370:56 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BOARD _ License Detail Contractor License # 370156 DISCLAIMER A license status check provides information taken from the CSLB license data base. Before relying on this information, you should be aware of the following limitations: . CSLB is prohibited by law from disclosing complaints until they are referred for legal action. . Per B &P 7071.17. only construction related civil judgments known to the CSLB are disclosed. . Arbitrations are not listed unless the contractor fails to comply with the terms of the arbitration. . Due to workload, there may be relevant information that has not yet been entered onto the Board's license data base. * * * BUSINESS INFORMATION * * * CRAIG LEWIS GENERAL CONTRACTOR P O BOX 968 CARDIFF, CA 92007 Business Phone Number: (858) 756 -1873 Sole Ownership Date: 02/14/1979 Expire Date: 02/28/2003 * * * LICENSE STATUS * * * license is current and active. All information below should be reviewed. * * * CLASSIFICATIONS B GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR * * * CERTIFICATIONS HIC HOME IMPROVEMENT CERTIFICATION * * * CONTRACTOR BONDING INFORMATION * * * license has bond number SA5132246 in the amount of $7,500 with the bonding company * * * WORKERS COMPENSATION INFORMATION * * * I license is exempt from having workers compensation insurance; they have no employees at time. .ctive Date: 10/22/1993 Expire Date: NONE r pm 7'T�:C3•IT 1 of 1 2/7/2001 11:07 AM License Detail wysiwyg: //6/ http:// www2 .csib.ca.to ... License+Detail. DML ?LicNum =+ +704370 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BOARD _ License CALIFORA Contractor License # 704370 DISCLAIMER A license status check provides information taken from the CSLB license data base. Before relying on this information, you should be aware of the following limitations: . CSLB is prohibited by law from disclosing complaints until they are referred for legal action. . Per B &P 7071 17 only construction related civil judgments known to the CSLB are disclosed. . Arbnronons are not listed unless the contractor fails to comply with the terms of the arbitration. . Due to workload, there may be relevant information that has not yet been entered onto the Board's I icense data base. ., rvva * * BUSINESS INFORMATION BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT INC P 0 BOX 270649 SAN DIEGO, CA 92198 -0649 Business Phone Number: (619) 613 -2990 Entity: Corporation Issue Date: 03/23/1995 Expire Date: 03/31/2001 * * * LICENSE STATUS * * * This license is current and active. All information below should be reviewed. * * * ADDITIONAL STATUS INFORMATION * * * PENDING DISCIPLINARY ACTION Disciplinary action is pending against this licensee in the form of an accusation. (An accusation is a disciplinary action that has been referred to the Office of the Attorney General and may result in the suspension or revocation of a license. Licensees have the right to appeal a disciplinary action and no conclusion or judgments as to the validity of any charges should be assumed until the legal action process has been completed). For further information, please call the Case Management Office in your area: (916) 2554041 Northern California or (562) 466 -6021 Southern California. * * * CLASSIFICATIONS B GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR * * * CONTRACTOR BONDING INFORMATION * * * This license has bond number 177332C in the amount of $7,500 with the bonding company Date: * * * WORKERS COMPENSATION INFORMATION * * * This license has workers compensation insurance with the LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY. Policy Number: WC11227074 Effective Date: 10/01/2000 Expire Date: 10 /01/2001 Personnel listed on this license (current or disassociated) are listed on other licenses. Personnel List Other Licenses I of 2 2/72001 11:9 350' 316HT 015TANCE EXHIBIT MM 98-272 - 6277-6 NOV 1 12000 cnoirvttHlNG SERVICES FUMM CITY OF ENCI NITA$ R4KH F/L EXISTDC GAOL MIND" SIGHT LRE __ r i -- PROFILE. / SY.ALE HORl" _ 60. VER1. =10' PROPIDSED GFMDE EtYpi QPpFESS /pl�i�� GQ�O y -E A. Pgs`t�ty P O uC'u' j _l.', i N6. 29577 Exp. 3/31/03 PARCEL 3 PARCEL 4 / vn° _y o0 Si.�IVISIIN 60(R41RY / / u• r•a PLAN: STALE 1' - 60' �-- CFNTERLBE 60 NIIE PRIVATE M" UTILITY EA.47FM PER WC. iEC.1 -31-64 AS FILE PASCO ENGINEERING AV, 196b4 6F RFFICIAL R WES (858) 259 -8212 EA'E OF 60.00 #HE PRIVATE 8.7106 535 N. HWY 101. STE. A UTILITY E49MM PER 00C. TEC.1 -31-64 AS FIE SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 W. 1904 OF OFFICLV. IECOrW PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 November 8, 2000 Alan Archibald NOV 14 two City Engineer City of Encinitas ENCfry p ING SER IC 505 So. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: DEFERRAL OF MONUMENTATION FOR TPM 98 -272 Dear Mr. Archibald: WAYNE A. PASCO R.C.E. 29577 PE 786 We anticipate the cost for monumentation of the above referenced Parcel Map at $1500 If you have any further questions, please give me a call. Very truly yours, PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. PJ o e Yuhas Director Land Surveying �N C. Y\ G v 1'^ No. 5211 JY 7G -3n x 1 BONDING COST ESTIMATE FOR: Adam's Run (TPM 98 -272) Sewer PREPARED FOR: Benamel Development PE786 PASCO ENGINEERING, INC 535 N. HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 WAYNE A. PASCO, RCE 29577 AT R " \ .F I -I c--� 51 1 DRAWING No. CS -360 PRIVATE SEWER ESTIMATE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT ITEM OTY UNIT G p IVAT . SEWER 8" PVC SEWER MAIN (SDR -35) SEWER MANHOLE (S -17) SEWER CLEANOUT (S -3) 4" PVC SEWER LATERALS (S -13) UNIT PRICE PE786 09/11/2000 TOTAL 462 LF @ $60.00 $27,720.00 3 EA ® $3,000.00 $9,000.00 1 EA Qa $1,100.00 $1,100.00 4 EA Q $577.00 $2,308.00 SUBTOTAL= $40,128.00 10% CONTINGENCIES= $4,012.80 GRAND TOTAL= $44,140.80 V BONDING COST ESTIMATE FOR: (TPM 98 -272) ADAM'S RUN PREPARED FOR: BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT PE 786F PREPARED BY: PASCO ENGINEERING, INC 535 N. HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 A. N0.29577 Exp. 3/31/03 WAYNE PASCO, RCE 29577 DATE GRADING /PRIVATE & PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BONDING ESTIMATE (6277 -G) 09/07/2000 CITY OF ENCINITAS TOTAL $24,656.50 GRADING: ITEM QTY UNIT @ UNIT PRICE TOTAL DRAINAGE: @ $13.75 $24,021.25 4" AC PVMT OVER 6" AG. BASE 54,743 T WIDE PCC BROW DITCH, D -75 580 LF @ $13.00 $7,540.00 CONCRETE SPILLWAY 2 EA @ $300.00 $600.00 ROCK -LINED DRAINAGE CHAN. PCL 4 360 LF @ $25.00 $9,000.00 12 "X12" AREA DRAIN 2 EA @ $50.00 $100.00 3" PVC CURB OUTLET 5 EA @ $325.00 $1,625.00 #2 BACKING RIP RAP 21.5 CY @ $150.00 $3,225.00 STREET INLET 1 EA @ $325.00 $325.00 SUBTOTAL $22,415.00 10% CONTINGENCIES $2,241.50 SUBTOTAL $330,088.93 10% CONTINGENCIES $33,008.89 TOTAL $363,097.82 TOTAL $24,656.50 GRADING: 6" PCC MOD.ROLLED CURB 1747 LF @ $13.75 $24,021.25 4" AC PVMT OVER 6" AG. BASE 54,743 SF @ $2.55 $139,594.65 CONC. C &G TRANSITION 79 LF @ $13.75 $1,086.25 4" AC DIKE TYPE "E" PER G -5 3,090 LF @ $7.55 $23,329.50 PCC CROSS - GUTTER, G -12 1090 SF @ $5.00 $5,450.00 TYPE "B" CURB INLET 4 EA @ $3,675.00 $14,700.00 15' PVC CULVERT 28.62 LF @ $84.00 $2,404.08 18" PVC CULVERT 44.5 LF @ $84.00 $3,738.00 30" RCP CULVERT 118.97 LF @ $110.00 $13,086.70 WING TYPE HEADWALL 3 EA @ $3,970.00 $11,910.00 TYPE "F" CATCH BASIN 1 EA @ $3,400.00 $3,400.00 BRUSHED CONCRETE TRAIL CROSSING 410 SF @ $3.80 $1,558.00 NO PARKING SIGNS 6 EA @ $500.00 $3,000.00 STOP SIGN 1 EA @ $500.00 $500.00 EXCAVATION /EMBANKMENT 12000 CY @ $4.10 $49,200.00 SLOPE PROTECTION /HYDROSEED 44700 SF @ $0.15 $6,705.00 EROSION GRAVEL/SAND BAGS 2600 EA @ $1.50 $3,900.00 PCC DRIVEWAYS PER G -14 690 SF @ $3.95 $2,725.50 IMPORT 2,300 CY @ $8.60 $19,780.00 SUBTOTAL $330,088.93 10% CONTINGENCIES $33,008.89 TOTAL $363,097.82 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT EARTHEN TRAIL GRADING 9,911 SF @ $1.00 $9,911.00 RE- CONSTRUCT EARTHEN TRAIL 1,534 SF @ $1.00 $1,534.00 TRAIL MARKERS 3 EA @ $350.00 $1,050.00 TRAIL WATER BARS 19 EA @ $150.00 $2,850.00 SUBTOTAL $15,345.00 10% CONTINGENCIES $1,534.50 TOTAL $16,879.50 GRAND TOTAL $404,633.82 OCT.25.2000 1JA PM CTS PSCONDIDO October 25, 2000 Mr. John Silverwood NO. 1926 P. 1/1 CONSTRUCTION RST1NG & ENGINEERING, INC. SAN DIEGO, CA RIVERSIDE., CA 1414 Vinpatd Ave. 490 F_ hioeeland Ct. S.4, G Suite 7 Fuowhda CA 93129 ( *e ('A 91719 (760) 744.495.4 1909) A 1.18% 0601 7469806 foe (9119, 371-2144 FAX c/o Mr. Edward Fabrycki Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 North Highway 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 VENTURA, CA TRACY, CA LANCA.StER, CA 1645 PwirK Art. 24U N. Lmb 41114 IOIbA N. Svd, 105 We F Ctut R /head, CA 9x14 Tm5. CA 95304 Lamm,, CA 9.834 1805,4866475 (1411 839 -1190 16617726.9176 101514" Nib M 00018)428951, 16611726 96% Subject: Response to Plan Check Corrections Adam's Run, Proposed Four -Unit Development Olivenhain, California Reference: Update Geotechnical Investigation Adam's Run, Proposed Four -Unit Development Olivctlhain, California Prepared by CTE dated September 7, 2000 Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivcnhain, California Prepared by CTE dated September 16, 1998 Sirs: CTE Job No. 10 -2972 Via Facsimile: 858 259.4812 NOV 1 4 2000 The referenced report dated September 7, 2000 should be considered as supplemental to the referenced 1998 report for this project. This project is considered feasible from a geotechnical viewpoint. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this transmittal, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTTNG & ENGINEERING, INC. k6dney D. Ba lard, GE #2173 Manager, Geotechnical Engineering cc: Mr. John Silverwood, via facsimile. 858/613 -2999 I� Jon , TT Fraadma S for Geologist GEOTECIINICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION ENGINEERING, INC. /�o✓ CONSTOUCTION STING & tNGINEERING, INC. SAN DIEGO, CA RIVERSIDE, CA VENTURA, CA TRACY, CA 2414 Vineyard Ave. 4% E. PrinreWM CL 1665 Pacific Arc 211 W. larch Suite G Suite 7 Suite 105 Suite F Escondido, CA 92029 Coma, CA 91719 Oxnard, CA 93033 Tracy, CA %376 (760) 7464955 (909)371 -18% (6611196.6475 (209) 839-2090 (760) 7469806 FAx (9091371 -2168 FAx (661) "9016 FAx UP) M219S PAX UPDATE GEOTECHINICAL INVESTIGATION ADAM'S RUN PROPOSED FOUR -UNIT DEVELOPMENT OLIVENHAIN, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT 16885 WEST BERNARDO DRIVE SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92127 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92029 CTE JOB NO. 10 -2972 LANCASTER, CA 4215610th SL W. Unit K Lancaster, CA 93534 ("l) 726 - %76 1661) 726 %76 FAx SEPTEMBER 7, 2000 GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION ENGINEERING, INC. CONSTOCTION STING & tNGINEERING, INC. SAN DIEGO, CA RIVERSIDE, CA VENTURA, CA TRACY, CA LANCASTF.R,CA 2414 Vineyard Ave. 490 E. Princeland CI. 1645 PxiOc Ave. 242 W. Lurch 42156 10th St, W. Suite G Suite 7 Suite 105 Suite F I nh K Fsrondidq CA 92029 Corona, CA 91719 Oxnard, CA 93033 Tracy. CA 95376 Lancaster, CA 97574 (760) 74&4955 (909) 37118% (661) 486 -6475 1209103928% (661) 726 %76 (760) 746.9806 FAx (9091371.2168 FAx (66D 4869016 FAx 1209) 8392895 FAx 1661) 726 %76 FAx Mr. John Silverwood Benamel Development, Inc. 16885 West Bernardo Drive San Diego, California 92660 Subject: Update Geotechnical Investigation Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development Olivenhain, California Mr. Silverwood: At your request, CTE has prepared this update geotechnical investigation report. This firm had previously investigated this site in 1998. As part of the present scope of work we reviewed our earlier report. We also performed a geologic reconnaissance of the site area. Presented in this report are conclusions and recommendations for your use in project design. We appreciate the opportunity to he of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. J tl a Goodmacher, CEG #2136 e for Geologist GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Section page INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ....................................................................... ..............................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ...................................... ..............................2 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................... ..............................2 1.2 Scope of Services ............................................................................. ..............................2 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................. ..............................2 3.0 PREVIOUS FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS ............. ..............................3 3.1 Field Investigations .......................................................................... ..............................3 4.0 GEOLOGY .................................................................................................. ..............................4 4.1 General Setting ................................................................................ ..............................4 4.2 Geologic Conditions ........................................................................ ..............................4 4.2.1 Topsoils ................................................................................... ..............................4 4.2.2 Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics ........................................... ..............................4 4.3 Groundwater Conditions .................................................................. ..............................5 4.4 Seismic Refraction Survey Results and Rippability Assessment .... ..............................5 4.5 Geologic Hazards ............................................................................. ..............................7 4.5.1 General Geologic Hazards Observation ................................. ..............................7 4.5.2 Local and Regional Faulting ................................................... ..............................7 4.5.3 Seismic Loading Parameters ................................................... ..............................8 4.5.4 Liquefaction Evaluation .......................................................... ..............................8 4.5.5 Seismic Settlement Evaluation ............................................... ..............................8 4.5.6 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluat ion ............................................ ..............................9 4.5.7 Landsliding or Rocksliding ..................................................... ..............................9 4.5.8 Compressible and Expansive Soils ......................................... ..............................9 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... .............................10 5.1 General ............................................................................................ .............................10 5.2 Grading and Earthwork ................................................................... .............................10 5.3 Site Preparation ............................................................................... .............................10 5.4 Site Excavation ............................................................................... .............................11 5.5 Fill Placement and Compaction ...................................................... .............................11 5.6 Fill Materials ................................................................................... .............................12 5.7 Foundations and Slab Recommendations ....................................... .............................12 5.7.1 Foundat ions ............................................................................ .............................13 5.7.2 Foundation Settlement ........................................................... .............................13 5.7.3 Foundation Setback ............................................................... .............................14 5.7.4 Concrete Slabs ....................................................................... .............................14 5.8 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures .......................................... .............................14 5.9 Exterior Flatwork ............................................................................ .............................15 5.10 Drainage ........................................................................................ .............................15 5.11 Asphalt Pavements ...................................................................... ............................... !6 5.12 Slopes ............................................................................................ .............................16 TABLE QF CONTENTS 3ection..................................................................................................... ............................... 5.13 Construction Observation ............................................................. .............................17 5.14 Plan Review .................................................................................. .............................17 6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION .................................................... .............................18 FIGURES FIGURE 1 SITE INDEX MAP FIGURE 2 EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP FIGURE 3 RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL APPENDIX A REFERENCES CITED APPENDIX B EXPLORATION LOGS APPENDIX C SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING PROJECTS Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 1 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 INVESTIGATION SUMMARY This update investigation was performed to provide site - specific geotechnical information for the proposed four -unit residential development. Based on our findings, this project is feasible, from a geotechnical viewpoint, if the recommendations presented in this report are implemented. Previous investigations had found that surface and near- surface soils consist of topsoil and units of the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. Surficial topsoils were found to consist generally of moist, loose, clayey silty sands with gravel with abundant organics. Removal of topsoils will be necessary before construction may begin. The maximum observed depth of surficial soils requiring removal was approximately two feet below grade (fbg). Units of the Santiago Peak Volcanics, underlying the topsoils, generally excavated as dry, sandy clay to silty sands with coarse gravel and cobble -sized fragments. The Santiago Peak Volcanics were observed decreasingly less weathered with increasing depth beneath the surface. Groundwater was not encountered in our borings to the total depths explored (approximately eight and %x fbg). Although groundwater levels will likely fluctuate during periods of precipitation, groundwater is not expected to affect the proposed development if recommendations regarding drainage are carried out during construction. With respect to geologic and seismic hazards, the site is considered as safe as any within the San Diego County area, a region of moderate to high seismic risk. Based on the geologic findings and reference review no active surface faults are known to exist at the site. Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 2 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. l Introduction This report presents the results of our update investigations and provides conclusions and geotechnical engineering criteria for the proposed development. It is our understanding that the site is to be developed by constructing four, one- and two -story, wood -frame residential structures and associated improvements (including utilities, landscaping, and driveway and sidewalk areas). Specific recommendations for excavations fill placement and foundation design for the proposed improvements are presented in this report. This firm had previously investigated this site in 1998 (CTE, 1998). That investigation included field exploration, laboratory testing, geologic hazard evaluation, and engineering analysis. Appendix A contains a list of references cited in this report. 1.2 Scope of Services The scope of services provided includes • Review of readily available geologic and soils reports pertinent to the site and adjacent areas. • Definition of the general geology and evaluation of potential geologic hazards at the site. • Soil engineering design criteria for the proposed improvements. • Preparation of this summary report (with geotechnical construction recommendations). 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The approximately 10 -acre site is north of Fortuna Ranch Road, across from its intersection with Akita Lane in the Olivenhain area in the City of Encinitas. In general, the site slopes downward toward the southwest. Approximate site elevations range from 476 feet above mean sea level (msl) at the northeastern corner of the property to 387 feet above msl at the southwestern corner. Figure 1 is an index map showing the general location of the site. 00...: -.... in_im,.,. n.Zmnu n_'f0'1NO... t 6.A... l:.......6.{�.1 A. Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 3 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 Several hard, relatively unaltered outcrops of volcanic rock were observed on the northern half of the site. Access to the site is via Fortuna Ranch Road, a dirt and gravel road forming the southern property boundary. A second dirt and gravel road forms the eastern site boundary. 3.0 PREVIOUS FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS 3.1 Field Investigations Field exploration, conducted July 27, 1998, included site reconnaissance, the observation and logging of ten shallow test pits, and five seismic refraction traverses (CTE, 1998). The test pits were excavated using a conventional backhoe to a maximum depth of approximately eight and % fbg. Geologists from this office logged soils in the field. Field descriptions and classifications were modified, where appropriate, to reflect laboratory test results. Exploration logs including descriptions of the soil and field- testing data are presented in our referenced report. Approximate exploration locations are shown on Figure 2. Copies of the test pit logs are presented in Appendix A. A Soil Test MD -1 l Signal Enhancement Seismograph was used during our seismic refraction surveys. The length of the five seismic traverses ranged from 70 to 100 feet. Approximate exploration locations are shown on Figure 2. Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to assist in the development of engineering parameters for this project. Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 4 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 4.0 GEOLOGY 4.1 General Setting The site lies within the northern coastal portion of San Diego County area. Landforms near the site consist generally of uplifted marine terraces grading into rolling hills. The areal topography generally slopes down to the west and south. 4.2 Geologic Conditions Based on geologic mapping by Tan and Kennedy (1996) soils consist of Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. However, based on our observations a surficial layer of topsoils overlies the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. The nature and depth of basement rocks below the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics are unknown. 4.2.1 Topsoils Topsoils were observed to depths of about one to two fbg. In general, these soils were found to consist of moist, loose, clayey, silty sands with abundant organics. Topsoils are not suitable, in their current state, for support of structures or additional fill. We recommend removal of these soils. However, they may be re -used as fill onsite if they are screened of organic contamination and oversize debris (greater than three inches in diameter). 4.2.2 Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics Several sub -units of the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics were observed underlying topsoils. These included residual soils (forming from the in -place decomposition of the bedrock), volcanic rock, and volcanic tuffs. Each of these sub -units was observed to become less P \0...:..ra I/ IM rn IpA9 k n 909'1 \Om IIM.0 rl --k.;­ I A- Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 5 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 weathered with increasing depth beneath the surface. These soils excavated as sandy clays to silty sands with coarse gravel to cobble -sized fragments. 4.3 Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was not encountered in any of our exploratory test pits to the maximum depth explored of eight and % fbg. Groundwater is not expected to affect the proposed development provided proper drainage is maintained. 4.4 Seismic Refraction Survey Results and RiiRpability Assessment Presented in Tables 1 and 2 below are the results and interpretations of our seismic refraction survey traverses. In general, we were able to resolve two different velocity layers from each traverse. However, interpretation the data was made difficult by the presence of the previously mentioned bedrock knobs. Table 1 below presents our interpretation of the "raw" seismic refraction data. Noticeable increases in velocity (from 1100 — 2000 fee/second to 2750 — 6000 feet/second were observed at approximate depths of 2 — 3.4 fbg. Weathered volcanics typically have a velocity of 2,000 -6,000 feet/second (f 1s). Solid volcanic rock typically has a velocity of 6,000 - 20,000 ft/s. Therefore, data from the test pits and the seismic traverses suggest that hard volcanic bedrock will be encountered at depths of 10 to 17 fbg in the areas investigated. However, based on surface observations of outcrops, we anticipate solid volcanic rock will be encountered locally at shallower depths. TABLE PRELM41NARY RIPPABILITY ASSESSMENT F1D...i.nh I n.1MI rn ln.JO k 0.9p"191pnr rIMe4.I:.nr.. Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 6 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 Seismic Depth of Layers Rippability Assessment Traverse No. (feet) Length of Traverse (feet) Maximum Depth Explored (feet) 0 -3.1 Rippable V3 3.1 -17 Rippable to Marginally Rippable ST -1 +17 Non-Rippable 3000 0 -2 Rippable 17 2' -10.4 Rippable to Marginally Rippable ST -2 +10.4 Non-Ri ppable 2750 0-4 Rippable ST -3 4 Rippable to Marginally Rippable ST -3 0 -3.4 Rippable 6000 3.4' -16 Rippable to Marginally Rippable ST-4 +16 Non-Rippable ST4 0-3 Rippable ST -5 3' -17 Rippable to Marginally Rippable 16 +17 Non-Rippable Presented on Table 2 is our interpretation of the data correlated to a Caterpillar D -9 with mounted hydraulic No. 9 ripper in igneous rocks (specifically volcanics). Caterpillar Tractor Company developed the correlation tables used. Velocities of less than 4,500 feet per second (fps) are considered rippable. Velocities between 4,500 and 5,500 fps are considered marginally rippable and may require blasting. Velocities of greater than 5,500 fps will most likely require blasting. TABLE 2 DATA FROM SEISMIC TRAVERSES Traverse No. Approximate Elevation (feet above msl) Layer Velocities Depth feet Length of Traverse (feet) Maximum Depth Explored (feet) V, VZ V3 Dr 62 ST -1 460 1300 3000 6000 3.1 17 100 30± ST -2 451 2000 2750 6000 2 10.4 80 25+ ST -3 444 1300 6000 4 70 20± ST4 434 1500 4000 7000 3.4 16 80 25+ Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 7 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 4.5 Geologic Hazards 4.5.1 General Geologic Hazards Observation From our investigation it appears that geologic hazards at the site are primarily limited to those caused by violent shaking from earthquake generated ground motion waves. The potential for damage from displacement or fault movement beneath the proposed structures should be considered low due to the absence of any known active surface faults in the immediate site area. 4.5.2 Local and Regional Faulting Based on our site reconnaissance, evidence from our explorations, and a review of appropriate geologic literature, it is our opinion that the site is not on known fault traces. The Rose Canyon Fault, approximately six miles (10 kilometers) to the west, is the closest known active fault (Jennings, 1987). Other principal active regional faults and fault zones are the San Clemente, Coronado Banks, Elsinore, San Jacinto, and San Andreas. According to the TABLE 2 DATA FROM SEISMIC TRAVERSES Traverse Approximate Layer Velocities Depth Length of Maximum No. Elevation feet Traverse Depth V, V2 V3 D, DZ (feet above (feet) Explored msl) (feet) ST -5 410 1100 2250 8000 3 17 100 30+ NOTES: V, - Velocity in feet per second of first layer of materials. VZ - Second layer velocity. V3 - Thud layer velocity. D, - Depth in feet to base of first layer. Di - Depth to base of second layer. 4.5 Geologic Hazards 4.5.1 General Geologic Hazards Observation From our investigation it appears that geologic hazards at the site are primarily limited to those caused by violent shaking from earthquake generated ground motion waves. The potential for damage from displacement or fault movement beneath the proposed structures should be considered low due to the absence of any known active surface faults in the immediate site area. 4.5.2 Local and Regional Faulting Based on our site reconnaissance, evidence from our explorations, and a review of appropriate geologic literature, it is our opinion that the site is not on known fault traces. The Rose Canyon Fault, approximately six miles (10 kilometers) to the west, is the closest known active fault (Jennings, 1987). Other principal active regional faults and fault zones are the San Clemente, Coronado Banks, Elsinore, San Jacinto, and San Andreas. According to the Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 8 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 California Division of Mines and Geology, a fault is zoned as active if it displays evidence of activity in the last 11,000 years (Hart, 1994). 4.5.3 Seismic Loading Parameters In accordance with the Uniform Building Code 1997 edition and assumed preliminary information, the project site should be considered to have source factors of Nv=1.0 and N. 1.Q and seismic coefficients of Cv =0.56 and C, =0.40. These factors are based on a seismic zone factor Z =0.40, a seismic source type of B for the Rose Canyon Fault, a distance from the seismic source to the subject site of approximately 10 km, and a soil profile of S.. 4.5.4 Liquefaction Evaluation Liquefaction occurs when saturated fine- grained sands or silts lose their physical strengths during earthquake induced shaking and behave as a liquid. This is due to loss of point -to -point grain contact and transfer of normal stress to the pore water. Liquefaction potential varies with water level, soil type, material gradation, relative density, and probable intensity and duration of ground shaking. Based on the generally dense nature of the underlying on -site soils and the absence of a permanent shallow groundwater condition, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction should be considered low in all areas of the project. 4.5.5 Seismic Settlement Evaluation Seismic settlement occurs when loose to medium dense granular soils densify duving seismic events (earthquakes). The underlying on -site materials were generally found to be medium rAo..,:.,... Ir Imir,,in_�nm�in_io »�o.,. Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 9 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 dense to very dense and are not considered likely to experience significant seismic settlement. Therefore, in our opinion, the potential for seismic settlement resulting in damage to site improvements should be considered low. 4.5.6 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation The site is not near any significant bodies of water that could induce seiche (oscillatory waves) damage. Because of the site's distance from the ocean (approximately one mile) and elevation above sea level, the potential for tsunami damage at the site is considered remote 4.5.7 Landsliding or Rocksliding During our investigation, active landslides were not encountered. Additionally, active slides have not been mapped in the immediate area of the site (Tan and Giffen, 1995). According to Tan and Giffen (1995), the site area is designated as marginally susceptible to landsliding. However, the lack of significant steep natural slopes decreases the probability of landsliding on this site. Cut slopes should be evaluated during grading operations by the geotechnical representative to verify conditions are as anticipated. If potential adverse slope conditions were observed, alternate recommendations may be warranted. 4.5.8 Compressible and Expansive Soils Based on geologic observation and laboratory testing of similar soils from nearby lots, Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanic materials exhibit very low to low compressibility and expansion characteristics and are considered suitable for support of fill and improvements. Surficial topsoWill soils were found to be low to moderately expansive and compressible. F90...:..... II1.IMI r- IILifYHll IA 90"f P_r I L.A.r- l:- ...MA..G.I A.... Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 10 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 Therefore, we recommend the removal of surficial soils to the depth of competent Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 General We conclude that the proposed construction at the site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, if the recommendations in this report are incorporated into the design of the project. 5.2 Gradin¢ and Earthwork Upon commencement of construction, we should continuously observe grading and earthwork operations for this project. Such observations are essential to identify field conditions that differ from those predicted by this investigation, to adjust designs to actual field conditions, and to determine that the grading is in overall accordance with the recommendations of this report. Our personnel should perform adequate observation and sufficient testing of fills during grading to support the Geotechnical Consultant's professional opinion regarding compliance with compaction requirements and specifications contained herein. 5.3 Site Preparation Before any grading occurs, the site should be cleared of existing debris and other deleterious materials. In areas to receive structures or distress - sensitive improvements, surficial eroded, desiccated, burrowed, or otherwise loose or disturbed soils should be removed to the depth of the competent Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. Remo•ial depths of one to two tbg are expected. To prevent transitional bearing conditions (a change from cut native to fill soils under the building) it Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 11 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 may be necessary to perform overexcavation to create a uniform 3 -foot thick fill cap on some lots. Overexcavations to create this fill cap should extend a minimum of five feet laterally beyond proposed improvement limits. Organic materials not suitable for structural backfill should be disposed of off -site or placed in non - structural planter or landscape areas. All organic materials excavated and removed should be disposed of at a legal disposal site. 5.4 Site Excavation Based on our observations, shallow excavations in site materials will generally be feasible with light construction equipment under normal conditions. Irreducible materials greater than six inches in maximum diameter should generally not be encountered during excavations and if encountered, should not be used in shallow fills on the site. We should be called upon to evaluate the subgrade to verify that mitigative measures (removal of inadequate soils and treatment of transitional conditions) have been properly implemented. As stated, transitional bearing conditions are to be avoided. All structures should be underlain entirely by properly compacted fill or entirely by Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. No footing or slab area should span a cut: fill interface. Again, to avoid transitional conditions it may be necessary to perform overexcavation on some lots. 5.5 Fill Placement and Compaction The geotechnical consultant should verify that the proper site preparation has occurred before fill placement occurs. Following removal of loose, disturbed soils areas to receive fills or concrete slabs on grade should be scarified to a depth of at least nine inches, moisture conditioned to above m�o...�..... I MM I,, m_1mm I nn07110.1 I Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 12 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 optimum moisture content, and properly compacted. Fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent as evaluated by ASTM D1557 at moisture content between 2 and 4 percent above optimum. The optimum lift thickness for backfill soil will be dependent on the type of compaction equipment used. Generally, backfill should be placed in uniform lifts not exceeding 8- inches in loose thickness. Backfill placement and compaction should be done in overall conformance with geotechnical recommendations and local ordinances. 5.6 Fill Materials Very low to low expansion soils derived from the onsite materials are considered suitable for reuse on the site as compacted fill, provided they are screened of organic materials and materials greater than six inches in maximum dimension. If encountered, clayey native soils may be blended with granular soils and reused in non - structural fill areas. Imported fill beneath structures, pavements and walks should have an expansion index less than or equal to 30 (per UBC Table 18 -I -B) with less than 35 percent passing the no. 200 sieve. 5.7 Foundations and Slab Recommendations The following recommendations are for preliminary planning purposes only. Based on the anticipated low expansion potential of on -site soils, recommended foundations consist of reinforced footings/slabs -on -grade or post- tension systems. Recommendations provided below are for standard reinforced footings/slabs -on -grade construction. If post- tension foundation systems are selected, additional recommendations will be provided. Foundation recommendations should be reviewed after completion of earthwork and soil testing. v.�o.,.:..... IA. IMI .n In. innn\ In_1071%0. IT"... dM Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 13 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 5.7.1 Foundations Continuous and isolated spread footings embedded a minimum of 12 inches into Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics or 18 inches into properly recompacted fill are suitable for use at this site. However, footings should not straddle cut/fill interfaces. Foundation dimensions and reinforcement should be based on allowable bearing values of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for footings founded on properly compacted fill. For footings founded directly on the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics an allowable bearing value of 3,000 psf should be used to calculate foundation dimensions and reinforcement. The allowable bearing value may be increased by one third for short duration loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces. Footings should be at least 12 inches wide and 18 inches below the lowest adjacent subgrade. Minimum reinforcement for continuous footings should consist of two #5 reinforcing bars; one placed near the top and one placed near the bottom. Isolated footing reinforcement should be designed by the project structural engineer. The structural engineer should also provide recommendations for reinforcement of any deepened spread footings and footings with pipe penetrations. 5.7.2 Foundation Settlement The potential for foundation settlement should be analyzed once actual foundation loads and final as- graded conditions are known. In general, for the anticipated residential construction, Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 14 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 maximum total and differential settlement are expected to be about 1 inch and 1/2 inch, respectively. 5.7.3 Foundation Setback Footings should be designed such that the minimum horizontal distance from the face of adjacent slopes to the bottom outer edge of the footing is a minimum of 10 feet. 5.7.4 Concrete Slabs Lightly loaded concrete slabs should be a minimum of four inches thick over a three -inch layer of compacted Class II base material. Minimum slab reinforcement should consist of #4 reinforcing bars placed on 18 -inch centers each way at mid -slab height. A vapor barrier of ten -mil visqueen placed in the middle of four -inch thick layer of crushed aggregated should be installed beneath moisture sensitive slab areas. 5.8 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures The following recommendations may be used for shallow footings on the site. Foundations placed in firm, well compacted fill material or competent formation may be designed using a coefficient of friction of 0.35 (total frictional resistance equals coefficient of friction times the dead load). A design passive resistance value of 300 pounds per square foot per foot of depth (with a maximum as the sum of the frictional resistance and the passive resistance, provided the passive resistance does not exceed two -thirds of the total allowable resistance. Retaining walls up to ten feet high and backfilled using granular soils may be designed using the equivalent fluid weights given in Table 4 below. cno.,,:.,.,, IA-IM1 r- IA_1 V IIA_109110m Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 15 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 TABLE 4 EQUIVALENT FLUID UNIT WEIGHTS (poun& per cubic foot WALL TYPE LEVEL BACKFILL SLOPE BACKFI LL 2:1 ORIZONTAL: VERTICAL CANTILEVER WALL 38 60 YIELDING RESTRAINED WALL 58 90 The above values assume non - expansive backfill and free draining conditions. Measures should be taken to prevent a moisture buildup behind all retaining walls. Drainage measures should include free draining backfill materials and perforated drains. Figure 3 provides recommended gravel and perforated pipe drainage system. These drains should discharge to an appropriate offsite location. 5.9 Exterior Flatwork To reduce the potential for unsightly cracking we recommend that flatwork be installed with crack- controljoints at appropriate spacing as designed by the project architect. Flatwork, which should be installed with crack control joints, includes driveways, sidewalks, and architectural features. All subgrade should be prepared according to the earthwork recommendations previously given before placing concrete. Positive drainage should be established and maintained next to all flatwork. 5.10 Drainage Surface runoff should be collected and directed away from improvements by appropriate erosion reducing devices. Positive drainage should also be established around the proposed improvements. The project civil engineer should thoroughly evaluate the on -site drainage and make provisions necessary to keep surface water from affecting the site. c.�o.,.;.,... r n_im i.,, i n_1mmin1011\0.* I r.,n... r..,...,.�...:..i n.., Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 16 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 5.11 Asphalt Pavements Pavement sections presented below are based on a Resistance "R" Value testing of representative surficial materials. The upper one -foot of native soils underlying all pavement sections should be appropriately moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the laboratory determined maximum density. Additionally, base materials should be appropriately moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the laboratory determined maximum density. The asphalt pavement design is based on California Department of Transportation Highway Manual and on traffic indexes as indicated in Table 5 below. Upon completion of finish grading, we recommend that additional sampling and testing of subgrade soils should occur and the pavement section modified, if necessary. TABLES ASPHALT PAVEMENT Traffic :Vea Traffic Index Subgrade AC Class D "R" Value Thickness Aggregate Base (inches) Thickness inches Local Surface 5.0 43 4.0 6.0 Streets 5.12 Slopes Although existing slopes on this site should be grossly stable, the soils will be somewhat erodible. Therefore, runoff water should not be permitted to drain over the edges of slopes unless that water is confined to properly designed and constructed drainage facilities. Erosion resistant vegetation should be maintained on the face of all slopes. Typically, soils along the top portion of a fill slope I n.9M 16. In.4nM \I n.10Pgnnr Iln.lel- r..w.rFn:..I A..,. Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 17 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 face will tend to creep laterally. Therefore, we do not recommend distress sensitive hardscape improvements be constructed within five feet of slope crests in fill areas. Proposed fill and cut slopes should be constructed at gradients of 2:1 (horizontal: vertical) or flatter. All slopes should be evaluated by CTE to verify that conditions are as anticipated. 5.13 Construction Observation The recommendations provided in this report are based on preliminary design information for the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions found in the exploratory locations. The interpolated subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during construction to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Recommendations provided in this report are based on the understanding and assumption that CTE will provide the observation and testing services for the project. All earthworks should be observed and tested to verify that grading activity has been performed according to the recommendations contained within this report. All footing trenches should be evaluated by the project engineer before reinforcing steel placement. 5.14 Plan Review CTE should review the project foundation plans and grading plans before commencement of earthwork to identify potential conflicts with the recommendations contained in this report. C in imt .,. in_1m 1 In 101110..1 I �— Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 18 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION The field evaluation, laboratory testing and geotechnical analysis presented in this report have been conducted according to current engineering practice and the standard of care exercised by reputable geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the conclusions, recommendations and opinions expressed in this report. Variations may exist and conditions not observed or described in this report may be encountered during construction. Our conclusions and recommendations are based on an analysis of the observed conditions. If conditions different from those described in this report are encountered, our office should be notified and additional recommendations, if required, will be provided upon request. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ey . Bdllazd, GE #2T 3 `' GeoteclrRical Engineering Mana athan Se for 1 Pt ed from TOPO1 O2000 Wddfiowa Pmdwtu (m topo com) DOVE HOLLOW ROAD 1 � ST -2 TP -4® I � ST -3 ST -I ' TP -5 TP -3 1 ST -4 I � I I TP 2 WoP9 O LEGEND e� ° ®6 TP -1 TP -9 1 ® APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION � ST -5 TP -I � S; T-1 i APPROXIMATE SEISMIC I ,1-P 7 TRAVERSE LOCATION PROPERTY BOUNDARY P-8 ® TP -10 A VPROPOSED BUILDING FORTUNA RANCH ROAD " rum®v+opr I CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECNNICAL AND CONSMUCMON ENGINEENNG TESTTNO AND INSPECTION ziu vwerARn AVeNUE, sTEa esmNDmG CA. gzazslTeol T�n�uss I EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP RANCHO FORTUNA FORTUNA RANCH ROAD ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 10-2972 SCAIX NO SCALE A 8/98 2 RETAINING W. aQpo 0 oa0 ' o ..♦ o s0� � a �O a � Oa > ' 0 FINISH GRADE o 0 .tea ° � ° a a 0 a n . _ a WALL BACKFILL COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY 3/4" GRAVEL SURROUNDED BY FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 140 N, OR EQUIVALENT) ImLyAlle 4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR EQUIVALENT). MINIMUM 1% GRADIENT TO SUITABLE OUTLET WALL FOOTING \��� \� ` MINMUM 6" LAYER OF FILTER ROCK UNDERLYING PIPE c CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTEC} NlI AN CONSTAUCI1pN tNGMFt]tMG TESTING AM NSPECIION 2414 VINEYA AVENUE, MG ES(ONDIDO CA. MN(7W)]�"5 gIM®IMpM RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL 10' 2972 RANCHO FORTUNA NO SCALE FORTUNA RANCH ROAD A ENCINITAS. CALIFORNIA AG z APPENDIX A REFERENCES CITED c.�o..,;.,... rn_ImI r,. rnlm \r n.,n.�. REFERENCES CITED 1. Hart, Earl W., Revised 1994, "Fault- Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist Priolo, Special Studies Zones Act of 1972," California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42. 2. Construction Testing and Engineering, Inc., 1998, "Preliminary Geotechnica] Investigation, Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development, Olivenhain, California", [consultant report]. 3. Jennings, Charles W., revised 1987, "Fault Map of California with Locations of Volcanoes, Thermal Springs and Thermal Wells." 4. Tan, S.S. and Giffen, D.G., 1995, "Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, San Diego County California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Landslide Hazard Identification Map No. 35. 5. Tan, S.S. and Kennedy, M.P., 1996, "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern part of the San Diego County California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report No. 96 -02. R %O ;...b 1I lmf rn 111_llWllllLOOYI \pnr 11...61. r ✓6..i..l A.a. G \9 »i.•1�7�:�e1 EXPLORATION LOGS F.1pm:.r.r. IA-IM1 rn I IL'10'19 \Onr I L.A.r. l:...r..bnind Ar t¢ _CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. � 060T EC NNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENOINELRINO TESTING AND INSPECTION 3616 VINE TAR AVENUE, SUITE O ESCONDIDO CA 11019 1760) 7666911 ROJELT RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT '7E JOB NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 3108 T71RB0 BACMIOE FXCA VATION DATE: 727N8 1ED BY: V.1311.140 ELEVATION: NCam' TEST PIT RECORD: TP -1 Laboratory Tests Ti DESCRIPTION ML NIL 0 S © TOPSOIL: Loose. drv, light to medium brown, sandv SILT, with organics (roots, rootlets) with occasional cobble to small boulder size volcanics at depth. JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, drv, light gravish tan with orange to red brown clavev volcanics, excavates as sandv SILT, vesicular. tuffaceous texture, iron oxide strong along fractures, areas of mottled, very weathered, very iron stained material with increased red brown clay. 30 Dense, as above, slightly vesicular with m6c inclusions, iron oxide strong along fractures. Densitv increases with depth. Fracture pattern trending northwest, divoing approximately Wwest. Total depth = 3' Difficult to excavate at 3' No groundwater encountered &,CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. G OEOTECHNICAE AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE EICONGIOG CA. 92079 11601 196 -U51 L PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT JOB NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 31013 TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7/27M - -- _ - — LOGGED BY: V.BILBO ELEVATION: € n F TEST PIT RECORD: TP -2 Laboratory Tests DESCRIPTION NIL ML a 3 5 Q TOPSOIL: loose, drv. light to medium brown, sandv SILT with organics and cobble size volcanics. © JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS. Medium dense. drv. light tan with light grav and orange brown. volcanics, very weathered, excavates as fine sandv SILT to SILT. Iron oxide locally very strong along fractures and in pockets, very minor organics Density increases with depth. Q3 Very dense, drv. medium grav, volcanics, iron oxide throughout and locally very strong. Steeply dipping fractures trending approximately N35W. Total depth = 31 Refusal to further excavation at 3' No groundwater encountered "CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. OEOTECNNICA6 AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 1411 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE 0 ESCONDIDO CA. 92029 4760) 716 4911 O . PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CIE JOB NO: 10 -2972 _ EXCAVATION NfE HOD: JOHN DEERE 21013 7LR30 BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7R7Aa LOGGEDBY V.BBbO ELEVATION: a UCCA TEST PIT RECORD: TP -3 Laboratory Tests DESCRIPTION ML ML 1 3 5 QI TOPSOIL: loose, drv, light to medium brown, sandv SILT with organics (roots, grass, rootlets). occasional coarse gravel to cobble size volcanics. 02 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, dark orange brown with light I tan and greenish tan, volcanics. very weathered, excavates as sandv SILT, iron stain throughout and locally very strong in Dockets and fractures. 03 Medium dense to dense, mottled, volcanic& with sliaht1v tuffaceous texture. iron stain locally very strong. mostly along fractures. densitv increases with depth. Fractures trending avoroximately S70E, dipping acIproximately 60 °N. Total depth = 212" Refusal to further excavation at 27' No groundwater encountered F a� ONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. �h'Y V GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION A 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA 92029 (760) 716 -4955 YA@IfE 'G PROJECT: _RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CTE JOB NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION WTHOD: JOHN DEERE 310B TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 727/98 LOGGED BY: V,E E. ) ELEVATION: N TEST PIT RECORD: TP -4 Laboratory Tests F DESCRIPTION NIL rvH 3 5 QI TOPSOIL: Loose, drv, light to medium brown, sandv SILT with organics (roots, Grass, rootlets), occasional coarse gravel to cobble size volcanics. ❑2 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCAMCS: Medium dense to dense, drv, dark orange brown with light tan and dark Rrav, very weathered, excavates as fine sandv SILT to SILT, iron oxide throughout and very strong locally and on fractures, manganese stain, occasional organics, densitv increases with depth. E3 Dense to very dense, drv, medium grav with dark orange brown, volcanics, as above, less weathered, iron oxide throughout and strong on fractures. Occasional organics in fractures. Total depth = 3.5' Difficult to excavate at 3.5' No groundwater encountered kCONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. O UEOTECHNICAI AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TE9TINU AND INSPECTION ]III VINEYARD AY¢NUE, SUITED E9l'ON DIDO CA 920I9 (160) 146-4E35 c PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT TE JOB NO 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 3108 TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 727198 LOGGED BY: V.BILBO ELEVATION: 9 TEST PIT RECORD: TP -5 Laboratory Tests - U, a DESCRIPTION ML ML O 5 Q TOPSOIL: Loose, drv, light to medium brown, sandy SILT with organics. 02 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS Medium dense. drv, light brown to tan with orange brown, excavates as sandy SILT, occasional organics. Residual Soil. Q Medium dense to dense, dry to moist, dark orange to red brown with light grayish tan. weathered volcanics. breccia texture, excavates as clayey sandy SILT, trace clay. Abundant iron staining throughout and strong locally, occasional organic material, increased density and decreased weathering with depth. Total depth = 2.5' Difficult to excavate at 2.5' No groundwater encountered. CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. S ' OEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 1414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA. 920=9 (760) 716.4933 ROJEC7': RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT TE JOB NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 3108 TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7/27196 LOGGED BY: S. DFEM ELEVATION: a TEST PIT RECORD: TP -6 Laboratory Tests 0 DESCRIPTION SC -sM 5 �l TOPSOIL: Loose, dry, reddish brown. clayey silty SAND with organics (weeds, rootlets). �2 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Very dense, drv, olive to reddish brown, clayey silty fine SAND, abundant iron staining fractured. Total depth = 3 5' Difficult to excavate at 3.5' No groundwater encountered FIGURE I T77-1 ,£ CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. DEOTECHNICAE AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 3410 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA. 93029 (1601 740-495) L PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT TE JOB NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION W-ITIOD: JOHN DEERE 310B TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7/27M LOGGED BY: V.BQ.BO ELEVAl10N. ❑ � U 7 C7 ms � TEST PIT RECORD: TP -7 Laboratory Tests � p DESCRIPTION NIL- 0 SC -sm S []I TOPSOIL: Loose, dry to moist, medium brown. clavev sandv SILT to siltv SAND with organics (roots, rootlets) with occasional cobble size volcanics �]2 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense to dense, dry to moist dark orange to red brown with light tan, excavates as clavev silty SAND. Abundant iron staining throughout. very weathered. E3 Dense to very dense, dry to moist, dark orange brown and medium greenish gray, volcamcs, tine Dlagioclase Dhenocrvsts- abundant iron oxide on fractures, clav on fractures, areas of less competent material, steel) fractures trending apbroximately N IOW. Total depth = 63" Difficult to excavate at 6'3" No groundwater encountered CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. O OEOTECHNICAI AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING Tk JTINO AND INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE O fiSCON DIDO CA 930I1 (360) 746 -495J p:LpET 'G PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR. SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CIE JOB NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 310B TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7/27A8 LOWED BY V.BI1.BO ELEVATION: TEST PIT RECORD: TP -8 Laboratory Tests DESCRIPTION ED CL: h0. O © TOPSOIL: Loose to medium dense, dry to moist, medium to dark brown. silty sandy CLAY to clayey SAND with abundant organic material (roots, weeds. rootlets) �2 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS Medium dense to dense, dry to moist, greenish gra with orange brown, excavates as sandy CLAY. Areas of more comment angular volcanic fragments to 1/2 ", iron oxide throughout and locally strong, occasional organics. Very weathered. © Dense to very dense, dry to moist, medium greenish gray, volcanics, abundant von oxide. very strong on fracture surface, manganese stain, areas of more weathered material, occasional organics and trace clay on fractures. Total depth Difficult to excavate at 8 5' k—LL No groundwater encountered t CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ko G60Tfi CXNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 3414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCON DIDO CA ]3039 (160) 146-4931 PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CTE JOB NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 310B TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7127N8 LOGGED BY: V.BILBO EfEYATION: g F TEST PIT RECORD: TP -9 Laboratory Tests F7 D DI TOPSOIL: Loose. dry to moist. medium brown, clavev sandv SILT to silty SAND with organics (roots, rootlets), occasional cobble size volcanics 02 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS. Medium dense to dense, dry, medium brown with brown, excavates as clavev SAND, very weathered with angular volcanic fragments 03 Medium dense to dense, drv, mottled, greenish grav with orange brown, very weathered volcanics, ar0lic alteration, excavates as clavev siltv medium to coarse SAND. Densitv increases with depth_ abundant iron oxide. strong in pockets and on fractures. Q Dense to very dense, drv, strong, greenish grav, volcanics, with abundant iron oxide. less weathered than above. blockv, sandv areas, arav clav on fractures. Total depth = 8. Y Refusal to further excavation at 8.5' No groundwater encountered CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. O OEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENOINEEMIND TESTINO AND INSPECTION 146 I414 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITED BECONDIDO GA 9I019 I760I -4953 G . PROJECT . RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUTMENT _ CTE JOB NO: 104972 EXCAVATION NIE HOD: JOHN DEERE 3108 TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7127/98 LOGGED BY V.BIBO ELEVATION: Tests TEST PIT RECORD: TP -IOa (South Wall) Laboratory DESCRIPTION ED CL -W ID SC -SM Q 5 Q TOPSOIL: Medium dense, dry to moist. medium to dark reddish brown. clayey silty SAND to sandy CLAY with organics (roots, rootlets), occasional weathered volcanic fragments at depth increased clay at depth. Q Increased density, increased clay from above. Q JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, moist, light greenish Rrav, excavates as clayey silty fine SAND with gravel to cobble size volcanic fragments. Very weathered. ® Dense to very dense, dry to moist, dark orange brown with red brown and greenish arav, volcanics, abundant iron oxide mostly on fractures, clay on fractures. 7 otal depth= Y.5' Difficult to excavate at 7.5' No groundwater encountered CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECNNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION ]SIR VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCON pIDO CA. 53029 (1UR) 146-4951 {TI.PRI •• PROJECT : RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPAEM' CIE JOB NO: 10.2972 _ _ EXCAVATION IETHOD: JOHN DEERE 3111B TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 727198 LOGGED BY V.BILBO ELEVATION. � TEST PIT RECORD: TP -10b (North Wall) Laboratory Tests Cu i 0 C U pCd V m CL N^_ Q EE SC 5 Q TOPSOIL: Medium dense, dry to moist, medium to dark reddish brown, clayev silty SAND to sandv CLAY with organics (roots, rootlets), occasional weathered volcanic fragments at depth, increased clav at depth. Increased density, increased red brown clay. Q JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, moist. greenish gray. excavates as clavev SAND with volcanic fragments, areas of sandv material, minor iron oxide throughout. Dense to very dense, dry to moist, dark orange brown with red brown and greenish gray, volcanics, abundant iron oxide, mostly on fractures, clav on fractures. Total depth = 7.5' Difficult to excavate at 7.5' No groundwater encountered APPENDIX C STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Cn0...:. .IMMr. rn_amm rn_""R.e rr. ...rw.,.1.wL..r n,.,. Appendix C Specifications for Grading APPENDIX C STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING PROJECTS Section 1 - General C -5 The guidelines contained herein and the standard details attached hereto represent Construction Testing & Engineering's standard recommendations for grading and other associated operations on construction projects. These guidelines should be considered a portion of the project specifications. Recommendations contained in the body of the previously presented soils report shall supersede the recommendations and or requirements as specified herein. Disputes arising out of interpretation of the recommendations contained in the soils report or specifications contained herein shall be interpreted by the project geotechnical consultant. Section 2 - Responsibilities of Project Personnel The geotechnical consultant should provide observation and testing services sufficient to assure that geotechnical construction is performed in general conformance with project specifications and standard grading practices. The geotechnical consultant should report any deviations to the client or his authorized representative. The Client should be chiefly responsible for all aspects of the project. He or his authorized representative has the responsibility of reviewing the findings and recommendations of the geotechnical consultant. He shall authorize or cause to have authorized the Contractor and/or other consultants to perform work and/or provide services. During grading the Client or his authorized representative should remain on -site or should remain reasonably accessible to all concerned parties in order to make decisions necessary to maintain the flow of the project. The Contractor should be responsible for the safety of the project and satisfactory completion of all grading and other associated operations on construction projects, including, but not limited to, earthwork in accordance with the project plans, specifications and controlling agency requirements. Section 3 - Preconstruction Meeting A preconstruction site meeting shall be arranged by the owner and/or client and shall include the grading contractor, the design engineer, the geotechnical consultant, owner's representative and representatives of the appropriate governing authorities. Section 4 - Site Preparation The client or contractor should obtain the required approvals from the controlling authori_ies for the project prior, during and/or after demolition, site preparation and removals, etc. The appropriate approvals should be obtained prior to proceeding with grading operations. coo...:.... I n -IM I .,. i n_IQ71�R... i i..a... r..,...,.�,..:.a e,.,. Appendix C C -6 Specifications for Grading Clearing and grubbing should consist of the removal of vegetation such as brush, grass, woods, stumps, trees, root of trees and otherwise deleterious natural materials from the areas to be graded. Clearing and grubbing should extend to the outside of all proposed excavation and fill areas. Demolition should include removal of buildings, structures, foundations, reservoirs, utilities (including underground pipelines, septic tanks, leach fields, seepage pits, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, etc.) and other man-made surface and subsurface improvements from the areas to be graded. Demolition of utilities should include proper capping and/or rerouting pipelines at the project perimeter and cutoff and capping of wells in accordance with the requirements of the governing authorities and the recommendations of the geotechnical consultant at the time of demolition. Trees, plants or man-made improvements not planned to be removed or demolished should be protected by the contractor from damage or injury. Debris generated during clearing, grubbing and/or demolition operations should be wasted from areas to be graded and disposed off -site. Clearing, grubbing and demolition operations should be performed under the observation of the geotechnical consultant. Section 5 - Site Protection Protection of the site during the period of grading should be the responsibility of the contractor. Unless other provisions are made in writing and agreed upon among the concerned parties, completion of a portion of the project should not be considered to preclude that portion or adjacent areas from the requirements for site protection until such time as the entire project is complete as identified by the geotechnical consultant, the client and the regulating agencies. Precautions should be taken during the performance of site clearing, excavations and grading to protect the work site from flooding, ponding or inundation by poor or improper surface drainage. Temporary provisions should be made during the rainy season to adequately direct surface drainage away from and off the work site. Where low areas cannot be avoided, pumps should be kept on hand to continually remove water during periods of rainfall. Rain related damage should be considered to include, but may not be limited to, erosion, silting, saturation, swelling, structural distress and other adverse conditions as determined by the geotechnical consultant. Soil adversely affected should be classified as unsuitable materials and should be subject to overexcavation and replacement with compacted fill or other remedial grading as recommended by the geotechnical consultant. The contractor should be responsible for the stability of all temporary excavations. Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant pertaining to temporary excavations (e.g., backcuts) are made in consideration of stability of the completed project and, therefore, should not be considered to preclude the responsibilities of the contractor. Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant should not be considered to preclude requirements that are more restrictive by the regulating agencies. The contractor should provide during periods of extensive rainfall plastic sheeting to prevent unprotected slopes from becoming saturated and unstable. When deemed PAID ,,...., , n Im, -,In. inon, i n_'ra-rno... i e.,.. Appendix C C -7 Specifications for Grading appropriate by the geotechnical consultant or governing agencies the contractor shall install checkdams, desilting basins, sand bags or other drainage control measures. In relatively level areas and/or slope areas, where saturated soil and/or erosion gullies exist to depths of greater than 1.0 foot, they should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill in accordance with the applicable specifications. Where affected materials exist to depths of 1.0 foot or less below proposed finished grade, remedial grading by moisture conditioning in- place, followed by thorough recompaction in accordance with the applicable grading guidelines herein may be attempted. If the desired results are not achieved, all affected materials should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill in accordance with the slope repair recommendations herein. If field conditions dictate, other slope repair procedures may be recommended by the geotechnical consultant. Section 6 - Excavations 6.1 Unsuitable Materials Materials that are unsuitable should be excavated under observation and recommendations of the geotechnical consultant. Unsuitable materials include, but may not be limited to, dry, loose, soft, wet, organic compressible natural soils and fractured, weathered, soft bedrock and nonengineered or otherwise deleterious fill materials. Material identified by the geotechnical consultant as unsatisfactory due to its moisture conditions should be overexcavated, moisture conditioned as needed, to a uniform at or above optimum moisture condition before placement as compacted fill. If during the course of grading adverse geotechnical conditions are exposed which were not anticipated in the preliminary soil report as determined by the geotechnical consultant additional exploration, analyzation and treatment of these problems may be recommended. 6.2 Cut Slopes Unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant and approved by the regulating agencies, permanent cut slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 (horizontal: vertical). The geotechnical consultant should observe cut slope excavation and if these excavations expose loose cohesionless, significantly fractured or otherwise unsuitable material, the materials should be overexcavated and replaced with a compacted stabilization fill. If encountered specific cross section details should be obtained from the Geotechnical Consultant. When extensive cut slopes are excavated or these cut slopes are made in the direction of the prevailing drainage, a non - erodible diversion swale (brow ditch) should be provided at the top of the slope. 6.3 Pad Areas Appendix C C -g Specifications for Grading All lot pad areas, including side yard terrace containing both cut and fill materials, transitions, located less than 3 feet deep should be overexcavated to a depth of 3 feet and replaced with a uniform compacted fill blanket of 3 feet. Actual depth of overexcavation may vary and should be delineated by the geotechnical consultant during grading. For pad areas created above cut or natural slopes, positive drainage should be established away from the top -of- slope. This may be accomplished utilizing a berm drainage Swale and/or an appropriate pad gradient. A gradient in soil areas away from the top -of- slopes of 2 percent or greater is recommended. Section 7 - Compacted Fill All fill materials should have fill quality, placement, conditioning and compaction as specified below or as approved by the geotechnical consultant. 7.1 Fill Material Ouality Excavated on -site or import materials which are acceptable to the geotechnical consultant may be utilized as compacted fill, provided trash, vegetation and other deleterious materials are removed prior to placement. All import materials anticipated for use on -site should be sampled tested and approved prior to and placement is in conformance with the requirements outlined. Rocks 12 inches in maximum and smaller may be utilized within compacted fill provided sufficient fill material is placed and thoroughly compacted over and around all rock to effectively fill rock voids. The amount of rock should not exceed 40 percent by dry weight passing the 3/4 -inch sieve. The geotechnical consultant may vary those requirements as field conditions dictate. Where rocks greater than 12 inches but less than four feet of maximum dimension are generated during grading, or otherwise desired to be placed within an engineered fill, special handling in accordance with attached Plates and described below. Rocks greater than four feet should be broken down or disposed off -site. 7.2 Placement of Fill Prior to placement of fill, material the geotechnical consultant should inspect the area to receive fill. After inspection and approval, the exposed ground surface should be scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches. The scarified material should be conditioned (i.e. moisture added or air dried by continued discing) to achieve a moisture content at or slightly above optimum moisture conditions and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum density or as otherwise recommended in the soils report or by appropriate government agencies. Compacted fill should then be placed in thin horizontal lifts not exceeding eight inches in loose thickness prior to compaction. Each lift should be moisture conditioned as needed, thoroughly blended to achieve a consistent moisture content at or slightly above optimum and thoroughly c.�o...;.w. in_nmi.,. n.,,. Appendix C C -9 Specifications for Grading compacted by mechanical methods to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum dry density. Each lift should be treated in a like manner until the desired finished grades are achieved. The contractor should have suitable and sufficient mechanical compaction equipment and watering apparatus on the job site to handle the amount of fill being placed in consideration of moisture retention properties of the materials and weather conditions. When placing fill in horizontal lifts adjacent to areas sloping steeper than 5:1 (horizontal: vertical), horizontal keys and vertical benches should be excavated into the adjacent slope area. Keying and benching should he sufficient to provide at least six-foot wide benches and a minimum of four feet of vertical bench height within the firm natural ground, firm bedrock or engineered compacted fill. No compacted fill should be placed in an area after keying and benching until the area has been reviewed by the geotechnical consultant. Material generated by the benching operation should be moved sufficiently away from the bench area to allow for the recommended review of the horizontal bench prior to placement of fill. Within a single fill area where grading procedures dictate two or more separate fills, temporary slopes (false slopes) may be created. When placing fill adjacent to a false slope, benching should be conducted in the same manner as above described. At least a 3 -foot vertical bench should be established within the firm core of adjacent approved compacted fill prior to placement of additional fill. Benching should proceed in at least 3 -foot vertical increments until the desired finished grades are achieved. Prior to placement of additional compacted fill following an overnight or other grading delay, the exposed surface or previously compacted fill should be processed by scarification, moisture conditioning as needed to at or slightly above optimum moisture content, thoroughly blended and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum dry density. Where unsuitable materials exist to depths of greater than one foot, the unsuitable materials should be overexcavated. Following a period of flooding, rainfall or overwatering by other means, no additional fill should be placed until damage assessments have been made and remedial grading performed as described herein. Rocks 12 inch in maximum dimension and smaller may be utilized in the compacted fill provided the fill is placed and thoroughly compacted over and around all rock. No oversize material should be used within 3 feet of finished pad grade and within 1 foot of other compacted fill areas. Rocks 12 inches up to four feet maximum dimension should be placed below the upper 5 feet of any fill and should not be closer than 11 feet to any slope face. These recommendations could vary as locations of improvements dictate. Where practical, oversized material should not be placed below areas where structures or deep utilities are proposed. Oversized material should be placed in windrows on a clean, overexcavated or unyielding compacted fill or firm natural ground surface. Select native or imported granular soil (S.E. 30 or higher) should be placed and thoroughly flooded over and around all windrowed rock, such that voids are filled. Windrows of oversized material should be staggered so those successive strata of oversized material are not in the same vertical plane. Appendix C C -10 Specifications for Grading It may be possible to dispose of individual larger rock as field conditions dictate and as recommended by the geotechnical consultant at the time of placement. The contractor should assist the geotechnical consultant and/or his representative by digging test pits for removal determinations and/or for testing compacted fill. The contractor should provide this work at no additional cost to the owner or contractor's client. Fill should be tested by the geotechnical consultant for compliance with the recommended relative compaction and moisture conditions. Field density testing should conform to ASTM Method of Test D 1556 -82, D 2922 -81. Tests should be conducted at a minimum of two vertical feet or 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. Actual test intervals may vary as field conditions dictate. Fill found not to be in conformance with the grading recommendations should be removed or otherwise handled as recommended by the geotechnical consultant. 7.3 Fill Slopes Unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant and approved by the regulating agencies, permanent fill slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 (horizontal: vertical). Except as specifically recommended in these grading guidelines compacted fill slopes should be over -built and cut back to grade, exposing the firm, compacted fill inner core. The actual amount of overbuilding may vary as field conditions dictate. If the desired results are not achieved, the existing slopes should be overexcavated and reconstructed under the guidelines of the geotechnical consultant. The degree of overbuilding shall be increased until the desired compacted slope surface condition is achieved. Care should be taken by the contractor to provide thorough mechanical compaction to the outer edge of the overbuilt slope surface. At the discretion of the geotechnical consultant, slope face compaction may be attempted by conventional construction procedures including backrolling. The procedure must create a firmly compacted material throughout the entire depth of the slope face to the surface of the previously compacted firm fill intercore. During grading operations care should be taken to extend compactive effort to the outer edge of the slope. Each lift should extend horizontally to the desired finished slope surface or more as needed to ultimately established desired grades. Grade during construction should not be allowed to roll off at the edge of the slope. It may be helpful to elevate slightly the outer edge of the slope. Slough resulting from the placement of individual lifts should not be allowed to drift down over previous lifts. At intervals not exceeding four feet in vertical slope height or the capability of available equipment, whichever is less, fill slopes should be thoroughly dozer trackrolled. For pad areas above fill slopes, positive drainage should be established away from the top -of- slope. This may be accomplished using a berm and pad gradient of at least 2 percent. CAo ;.,... In_ImI .,. Appendix C Specifications for Grading Section 8 - Trench Backfill C -11 Utility and/or other excavation of trench backfill should, unless otherwise recommended, be compacted by mechanical means. Unless otherwise recommended, the degree of compaction should be a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density. Within slab areas, but outside the influence of foundations, trenches up to one foot wide and two feet deep may be backfilled with sand and consolidated by jetting, flooding or by mechanical means. If on -site materials are utilized, they should be wheel - rolled, tamped or otherwise compacted to a firm condition. For minor interior trenches, density testing may be deleted or spot testing may be elected if deemed necessary, based on review of backfill operations during construction. It utility contractors indicate that it is undesirable to use compaction equipment in close proximity to a buried conduit, the contractor may elect the utilization of light weight mechanical compaction equipment and/or shading of the conduit with clean, granular material, which should be thoroughly jetted in -place above the conduit, prior to initiating mechanical compaction procedures. Other methods of utility trench compaction may also be appropriate, upon review of the geotechnical consultant at the time of construction. In cases where clean granular materials are proposed for use in lieu of native materials or where flooding or jetting is proposed, the procedures should be considered subject to review by the geotechnical consultant. Clean granular backfill and/or bedding are not recommended in slope areas. Section 9 - Drainage Where deemed appropriate by the geotechnical consultant, canyon subdrain systems should be installed in accordance. Typical subdrains for compacted fill buttresses, slope stabilization or sidehill masses, should be installed in accordance with the specifications of the accompanying attached plates. Roof, pad and slope drainage should be directed away from slopes and areas of structures to suitable disposal areas via non - erodible devices (i.e., gutters, downspouts, and concrete swales) as shown in the attached plates. For drainage in extensively landscaped areas near structures, (i.e., within four feet) a minimum of 5 percent gradient away from the structure should be maintained. Pad drainage of at least 2 percent should be maintained over the remainder of the site. Drainage patterns established at the time of fine grading should be maintained throughout the life of the project. Property owners should be made aware that altering drainage patterns could be detrimental to slope stability and foundation performance. In_IMI 1� IA_IlW II 107mp., I r9 I. k..1­1 AM Appendix C C -12 Specifications for Grading Section 10 - Slope Maintenance 10.1 - Landscape Plants In order to enhance surficial slope stability, slope planting should be accomplished at the completion of grading. Slope planting should consist of deep - rooting vegetation requiring little watering. Plants native to the southern California area and plants relative to native plants are generally desirable. Plants native to other semi -arid and and areas may also be appropriate. A Landscape Architect should be the best party to consult regarding actual types of plants and planting configuration. 10.2 - Irrigation Irrigation pipes should be anchored to slope faces, not placed in trenches excavated into slope faces. Slope irrigation should be minimized. If automatic timing devices are utilized on irrigation systems, provisions should be made for interrupting normal irrigation during periods of rainfall. 10.3 - Repair As a precautionary measure, plastic sheeting should be readily available, or kept on hand, to protect all slope areas from saturation by periods of heavy or prolonged rainfall. This measure is strongly recommended, beginning with the period prior to landscape planting. If slope failures occur, the geotechnical consultant should be contacted for a field review of site conditions and development of recommendations for evaluation and repair. If slope failures occur because of exposure to period of heavy rainfall, the failure areas and currently unaffected areas should be covered with plastic sheeting to protect against additional saturation. In the accompanying Standard Details, appropriate repair procedures are illustrated for superficial slope failures (i.e., occurring typically within the outer one foot to three feet of a slope face). cno...:.... IMMI.n u.,n... r...... b..:..lA 9 HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN PREPARED FOR: BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PO BOX 270649 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92198 -0649 (858) 613 -2990 PREPARED BY: W.A. PASCO ENGINEERING 535 N. HIGHWAY 101 SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CALIF. 92075 (858) 259 -8212 DECEMBER 29, 1999 REVISED NNE 9, 2000 awr -L1D 55wr.:3, zwo PE 786F MA TABLE OF CONTENTS • SECTION I INTRODUCTION & DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION • SECTION 2 SITE HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS • SECTION 3 DRAINAGE CHANNEL HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS • SECTION 4 CURB OUTLET SIZING CALCULATIONS • SECTION 5 REFERENCE DATA & CHARTS • SECTION 6 DRAINAGE & NODE MAPS SECTION 1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION/DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION & DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION THE PROJECT SHOWN HEREIN INCLUDES A 4 LOT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL MAP WHICH INCLUDES HOUSE PAD GRADING & RECREATIONAL PAD GRADING FOR TENNIS COURTS, POOLS, HORSE RINK, ETC. THE ACCESS TO THE 4 PARCELS WILL BE ALONG A PRIVATE ASPHALT ROADWAY, USING CONCRETE ROLLED CURB ON BOTH SIDES. ALL PROPOSED DRAINAGE IS TO BE HANDLED AS SURFACE FLOW, WITH THE ONLY EXCEPTION BEING A TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL 4. THE EASTERLY LIMIT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NEAR A SMALL NATURAL RIDGE LINE. BECAUSE OF THIS, VERY LITTLE NATURAL DRAINAGE FLOWS ONTO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. ALL SITE DRAINAGE QUANTITIES HAVE BEEN CALCULATED USING THE SAN DIEGO FLOOD CONTROL DATA FOR 100 YEAR STORM FREQUENCY. THE SOIL TYPE WAS DETERMINED USING THE SAN DIEGO AREA SOIL SURVEY MAPS (SOIL TYPE "D "). THE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT OF 0.45 WAS DETERMINED BASED ON THE SOIL TYPE (D), AND THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPED LOT SIZES OF THE AREA (1/2 ACRE OR MORE). SECTION 2 SITE HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS if #i*ixxx #ixitf itiafxxx ixti *iiixt # # *ftx * *ti #ixx * # # *tf xiti#x ###ititxx * * *#f rff RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE Reference: SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1985,1981 HYDROLOGY MANUAL (c) Copyright 1982 -92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 1.3A Release Date: 3/06/92 License ID 1388 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 North Hwy. 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA. 92075 Ph. 858- 259 -8212 Fax: 858- 259 -4812 xtxtxr +araai +xf *xrtaaaifax DESCRIPTION OF STUDY taxtt + +at +a *xrfaaxaxxafaaa * TPM 98 -272 Adams Run Hydrology - PC #1 Corrections * 6 -9 -2000 * See Hydrology noe maps in foldout area of this report. iftxaffaaiaaxa *xxfttaxxxa *xtaa *aaxf a +fataa +ixxf *xf t +iraitxattaaaraf rafaa *r FILE NAME: 786A.DAT TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 10:43 6/ 9/2000 USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1985 SAN DIEGO MANUAL CRITERIA USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00 6 -HOUR DURATION PRECIPITATION (INCHES) = 3.600 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 6.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS (DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE _ .95 SAN DIEGO HYDROLOGY MANUAL "C "- VALUES USED NOTE: CONSIDER ALL CONFLUENCE STREAM COMBINATIONS FOR ALL DOWNSTREAM ANALYSES xxxaaai+ f** tf+ axix+*#+ t # + +aaafraa + * *itaxf +a *aixxa *f +f ai +i +aaxrrta *ataaaa +t +x FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 43.00 TO NODE 41.00 IS CODE = 21 » »> RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSES««< =SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 270.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 494.30 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION - 467.60 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 6.70 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 14.201 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 4.838 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .44 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .20 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) - .44 + s+ a+ a++++ a+++ s+ a+++ a++#+ saaaaa+ ra+ aa+ sa# aaat a +assrta #aaaar + + + +r + + +a +t + + + +a# FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 41.00 TO NODE 21.00 IS CODE = 51 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»> COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW ««< »» >TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA« «< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 487.60 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION 483.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) - 11.00 CHANNEL SLOPE = .4182 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = .30 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = .015 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) _ .70 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = .44 FLOW VELOCITY (FEET /SEC) = 10.28 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .09 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = .02 TC(MIN.) = 14.22 ++##++#t++++###++#t++t##t+##t r+++ a+# as#+++ a++ #at # # # #ar + # +s +satr # # # +t +aar + # ## FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 41.00 TO NODE 21.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION( MIN.) - 14.22 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 4.83 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = .20 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .44 aat++ s+ a+ at+++ s++ ra+++ s+ aaa+++ a+ ssaaar aaa ++aar # +aa + +aatraraaa + + ++ +saaats aaaa FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 42.00 TO NODE 21.00 IS CODE = 21 » » >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW - LENGTH = 95.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 490.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 483.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE - 7.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 5.861 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 8.561 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .23 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .06 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .23 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ r+++ a+++ s+ aa+ ++s + + + + +asr + + + + + + +r + +t + + ++ #a + #+ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 42.00 TO NODE 21.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE« «< »» >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES ««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 5.86 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 8.56 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .06 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .23 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CPS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 .44 14.22 4.834 .20 2 .23 5.86 8.561 .06 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF NUMBER (CFS) 1 .46 2 .57 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ Tc INTENSITY (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 5.86 8.561 14.22 4.834 ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: .57 Tc(MIN.) = 14.22 .26 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 21.00 TO NODE 26.00 IS CODE = 6 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >COMPUTE STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 483.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 428.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 575.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6. STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 16.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK = 1.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSS FALL (DEC IMAL) _ .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 * *TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 1.14 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .20 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 3.77 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 4.40 PRODUCT OF DEPTH &VELOCITY = .89 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MIN) = 2.18 TC(MIN) = 16.40 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY (INCH /HOUR) = 4.409 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .58 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.15 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) _ .84 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.72 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) _ .22 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 4.67 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 5.10 DEPTH *VELOCITY = 1.12 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) 1 2.37 7.60 2 1.72 16.38 NEW PEAK FLOW DATA ARE: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 2.37 Tc(MIN.) = 7.60 sr :aaa + +irarxarar + #i +f axtat+ i#+ s+ i* asaai+++ sa +i * *aa +tr +aarraar * + ++ +afrr +ra s+ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 21.00 TO NODE 26.00 IS CODE - 10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>MAIN- STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK i 1 ««< ai* saxrr+ aaaa+ saaarf+ iisaat+ r* ai+++ asaiar**++ is +axa *aia +aasasaar :r *raissaa *a FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 22.00 IS CODE - 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< = SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW - LENGTH = 155.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 475.50 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION - 468.10 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 7.40 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 8.651 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.660 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .63 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .21 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .63 ** aaaffr# xaf# iiir* it+ aia# a*** r#* iat*a*+ f* i# a* * * * * #ta * +arrrr * * #i+ta *afiar ***a FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 22.00 TO NODE 24.00 IS CODE 51 » » >COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW ««< »» >TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 468.10 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 445.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 215.00 CHANNEL SLOPE _ .1074 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = .30 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = .015 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) _ .50 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = .63 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) - 6.63 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .16 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .54 TC(MIN.) = 9.19 * aa* axxaaa++* axxi* i+ aar* aa+ x# axxx++ a#+ aaxa* f+ aaaaxs * +ait *saxaai * *aaar *aarrra FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 22.00 TO NODE 24.00 IS CODE 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.19 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) - 6.40 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .21 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .63 ++ arwaaar + +rrsarra + +raararaaa+sraraa +aa+ arras +raaaaarrrawaaraa + + + +rrawwa +aaa FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 18.00 TO NODE 23.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< =SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH - 260.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 470.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 448.60 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 21.40 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 9.345 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.337 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .77 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .27 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .77 sraaar+ rr+ waa+++ aawwrraaarwwsaaaaaaawr+ aaa+ arrw + +r +aararawwwwa +aaaawwwwwawr+ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 23.00 TO NODE 24.00 IS CODE 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< » » >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.34 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) - 6.34 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .27 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .77 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 .63 9.19 6.404 .21 2 .77 9.34 6.337 .27 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) 1 1.39 9.19 2 1.39 9.34 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1. TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = •48 INTENSITY (INCH /HOUR) 6.404 6.337 ARE AS FOLLOWS: 39 Tc(MIN.) - 9.34 + + + +t + + + + + + * + + + +r + + + ++ tat*+ a+ attaa+++ aata++ as +a + + + + + +awa +++aaattt + + ++ ++ +aaaa FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 24.00 TO NODE 26.00 IS CODE = 11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 1 WITH THE MAIN- STREAM MEMORY««< ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 1.39 9.19 6.404 .48 2 1.39 9.34 6.337 .48 ** MEMORY BANK # 1 CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 2.37 7.60 7.238 .84 2 1.72 16.38 4.412 .84 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 3.60 7.60 7.238 2 3.48 9.19 6.404 3 3.46 9.34 6.337 4 2.69 16.38 4.412 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) 3.60 Tc(MIN.) = 7.60 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.32 ++ aa+++ aat+ a++ a + +a + +r +at + + +atwaa + + + +aaaaaaa +at +raw + +* + +a +aw +aaa + +wwaaataa + ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 26.00 TO NODE 27.00 IS CODE = 6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>COMPUTE STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 428.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION =- 425.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 80.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6. STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 20.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK 1.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSS FALL (DEC IMAL) = .020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF - 1 * *TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .30 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 8.73 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 4.14 PRODUCT OF DEPTH &VELOCITY - 1.25 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MIN) = .32 TC(MIN) _ 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 7.047 kwYa 3.64 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .03 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .10 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) 1.35 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.69 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) _ .30 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 8.73 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 4.20 DEPTH *VELOCITY = 1.26 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 26.00 TO NODE 27.00 IS CODE = 1 »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE« «< =TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.92 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 7.05 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.35 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 3.69 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 25.00 TO NODE 27.00 IS CODE - 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - =`> >>> RATIONAL - METHOD - INITIAL - SUBAREA - ANALYSIS < < < =a______ __________________ SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW - LENGTH = 245.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 450.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 425.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 25.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 8.444 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY (INCH/ HOUR) = 6.765 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) 1.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .36 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.10 ++ i++ rwt wri+tt+t rtt+++ ir++ w+ rr++ axi+++ r++++ r+ +wx +wr +tiwwiir +t +wwwiirt + +rwirr FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 25.00 TO NODE 27.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE ««< »» >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES ««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 8.44 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 6.76 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 1.10 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 3.69 7.92 7.047 1.35 1 3.57 9.52 6.259 1.35 1 3.55 9.68 6.195 1.35 1 2.75 16.72 4.355 1.35 2 1.10 8.44 6.765 .36 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 4.74 7.92 7.047 2 4.64 8.44 6.765 3 4.58 9.52 6.259 4 4.55 9.68 6.195 5 3.45 16.72 4.355 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.74 Tc(MIN.) = 7.92 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.71 ****# r* ti**a#*#i aar* a***ti a**a r** *aata* **raa*ai***** **f ****r***x x * *a*tx *1a x* FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 155.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 479.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 468.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 11.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 1.749 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 5- MINUTES 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 9.485 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .90 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .10 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .90 #axxx #aa #rfx #aaatr #xfi *iii +r # #raa #tffai +f : #* +trait: #air +aaax• #aaaia #rraixi*t FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE 1 » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 5.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) - 9.49 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .10 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .90 at+ ar# r+ aatr+++ ritrat# ra+ a# axixaai+ rxrt+# aitrraxar #i#tr # #axxiti * #r #aa4xaaa #* FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS« «< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 160.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 475.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 468.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE - 7.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 9.049 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.469 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .93 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .32 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .93 aaa+ i+++ axwa+ r+ iaaawwaar+ xaataw++++ as +rwwwat + +aarr♦f +wa +axitr +aa +f iwwwai +iaa FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE 1 » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< »» >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.05 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 6.47 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = .32 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .93 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 .90 5.00 9.485 .10 2 .93 9.05 6.469 .32 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 1.54 5.00 9.485 2 1.55 9.05 6.469 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) 1.55 Tc(MIN.) = 9.05 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .42 +rwiwa +ararawaaa•i rawt ai+ aararart aaxww+ aa+ aarrwaa + +aaiwww+asrs + ++w ♦ +•wwwaa +a FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE = 6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »> COMPUTE STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 468.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 457.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 160.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) - 6. STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 12.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK = 1.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 * *TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 1.93 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .24 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 5.77 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 4.28 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = 1.03 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MIN) _ .62 TC(MIN) = 9.67 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY (INCH /HOUR) = 6.197 *USER SPECIFIED(SUBAREA): RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .19 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .77 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) _ .61 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.31 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) _ .25 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 6.42 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 4.36 DEPTH *VELOCITY ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) 1 2.63 5.58 2 2.31 9.67 NEW PEAK FLOW DATA ARE: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.63 TC(MIN.) = 5.58 +++++++ w+++ w+++ a+++t+ wwwr+ r++++ wwrt w+ r+++ wwt+ + + + + + + + + + +t ++ +r + +r + + + + + + + + + +rr+ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< ---- - - -- - - --- - - - - -- TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 5.58 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 8.84 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .61 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 2.63 + r++ rt+++++ rrara+ a++ r++ r++ r+ wr+ rw+++t wwt+ r+++ ♦t + ++rrr + +t+ + +wwt + + +rr ++ +a + +rrt FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW - LENGTH = 190.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 462.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 457.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE - 5.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) 11.682 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 5.487 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .57 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - .23 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .57 ilia #ifaairx + * # #a # #it *alt # #fa + +if #a# tit #faaiiaattiia+ai #ii +t at ti +iaria +ia +ti FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE 1 » » >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< »»>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES ««< --------------------------------- TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION (MIN.) = 11.68 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 5.49 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .23 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .57 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 2.63 5.58 8.840 .61 1 2.31 9.67 6.198 .61 2 .57 11.68 5.487 .23 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CPS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 2.98 5.58 8.840 2 2.81 9.67 6.198 3 2.61 11.68 5.487 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) 2.98 Tc(MIN.) 5.58 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .84 i a+ i+a xrti# r+ t+ 4r xir+ r+ i# aaxir fr+++ aaxriaairi ixx #ifaaia #x #rtkiatait + #rraiaa# FLAW PROCESS FROM NODE 4.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = 6 - --- - -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>COMPUTE STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA« «< xcxs=== sevx= ee== cexsss= x= xxcxxs=== sscexxxv== xxxxxxsexxxxnsxxx= xssxxxsxsexxan UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 457.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION 448.10 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 125.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6. STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 12.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK = 1.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF - 1 * *TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 3.36 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .27 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 7.08 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 5.43 PRODUCT OF DEPTH &VELOCITY - 1.45 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MIN) _ .38 TC(MIN) - 5.96 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) - 8.469 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - .4500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .20 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .76 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) = 1.04 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.74 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) _ .28 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 7.73 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 5.23 DEPTH *VELOCITY = 1.47 * Yfi*r a++t t# i** fat ii#** toai♦ a ## *waa + + #a # * * *tartaii #ia#tt#af ♦1#fw# *w * # *if it#* FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 4.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = 1 » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 5.96 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) - 8.47 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 1.04 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 3.74 #i4 iii# waatiaa# wa*# iiat#** ariaf #w * #aaraf # * * *i# ## ## *## # # #af of # ## #r#iwii#4 # # ## FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = 21 » » >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< -- --_ -_------------- --- SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW - LENGTH - 180.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION - 459.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 448.10 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 10.90 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 8.613 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.679 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .78 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .26 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .78 * war+++ aaaaa+++ a# wa++ rarwwrarara** a++ ria## rat aaa#ar + +rraa # #warraa # #ww * +at +ii FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 8.61 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) 6.68 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = .26 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .78 aaaastaarataa+ aaaxr+ araaaart + + +araar +a +rrr +aa * + + +aaarrr tzaraa +tr +rat +a + +atxr FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE - 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS« «< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW - LENGTH = 120.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION - 460.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION - 448.60 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 11.40 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 6.052 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY (INCH/ HOUR) = 8.386 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .75 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .20 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .75 r+ xrrtaaa+ a+++++ ra++ r+ rrtt++ aarrasa+ rrrxaar++ axrr +r + :ar +ta +a +artrrsrxxx + +• ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE 1 » » >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< » » >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 3 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 6.05 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 8.39 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = .20 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .75 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 3.74 5.96 8.469 1.04 1 3.36 10.09 6.031 1.04 1 3.10 12.13 5.354 1.04 2 .78 8.61 6.679 .26 3 .75 6.05 8.386 .20 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 3 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 5.11 5.96 8.469 2 5.08 6.05 8.386 3 4.41 8.61 6.679 4 4.61 10.09 6.031 5 4.20 12.13 5.354 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAR FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.11 Tc(MIN.) 5.96 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.50 r#*# r# s++* r# rr*###++#* r** rr#+ r+* r#+*#**# r+++# rra # # # # # + + #+ # # * +www + +# ### # + + + ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE = 6 ------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------- » » >COMPUTE STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 448.60 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 434.80 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 193.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6. STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 12.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK 1.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 * *TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 5.75 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .31 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 9.05 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 6.14 PRODUCT OF DEPTH &VELOCITY = 1.89 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MIN) = .52 TC(MIN) = 6.48 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 8.021 *USER SPECIFIED(SUBAREA): RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6700 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .24 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 1.29 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) = 1.74 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 6.40 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = .32 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 9.70 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) - 6.04 DEPTH *VELOCITY = 1.93 ***iii * #r **r*** * *w*r#* ** * **• *** tit * ♦** * * **** **r* #*****r r*r**r *** * ***r* +*r*r* FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE - 51 »»>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW««< »» >TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA ««< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 432.30 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 427.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 85.00 CHANNEL SLOPE = .0624 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = 5.00 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = .300 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) - 1.50 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 6.40 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) _ .98 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .94 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - 1.44 TC(MIN.) = 7.92 # ** iii+#* iiii4l it**++ 4 # # #ittif#ii+ffitttifiti4+ii4#if *f*ta4a4 ii4rrra44af ti kt FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.92 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 7.05 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.74 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 6.40 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE - 21 »» >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 115.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION - 432.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 427.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 5.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 7.688 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 7.187 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .58 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .18 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .58 it*****i******* 4* w*******i**** t*++*********** * * * * *t * * * * * ** * * * * *t + * * * * ** * ** ** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE - 1 »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< »»>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES« «< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.69 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 7.19 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .18 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .58 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 6.40 7.92 7.048 1.74 1 6.36 8.03 6.990 1.74 1 5.44 10.74 5.793 1.74 1 5.54 12.19 5.338 1.74 1 5.04 14.26 4.826 1.74 2 .58 7.69 7.187 .18 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF NUMBER (CFS) 1 6.86 2 6.97 3 6.93 4 5.91 5 5.97 6 5.43 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = Tc INTENSITY (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 7.69 7.187 7.92 7.048 8.03 6.990 10.74 5.793 12.19 5.338 14.26 4.826 ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: 6.97 Tc(MIN.) = 7.92 1.92 ra axxxw+ ixrattwwxwa + + +iaxxwww + + +rirr + * *w +a +ira as axxwa + + +i iwaxr *rxxwx + + +iiwar FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 9.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE 51 » » >COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW««< »»>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 427.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 418.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) 90.00 CHANNEL SLOPE = .1000 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = 5.00 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = .300 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 1.50 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 6.97 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) = 1.18 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .87 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.27 TC(MIN.) = 9.19 a#* aatii#+ aii# ia#+## i # #iaiait#ax #ww +wiia+w *w * #+iiaaf Rww *ii #+taiaai # *i *tw #tfi FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 9.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE 1 »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE ««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 9.19 RAINFALL INTENSITY (INCH /HR) = 6.41 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.92 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 6.97 *# rka*## ii*# i*#* aai+ a* iwaai* ia# k** ai*# iaax*** ai*rai * * * * * #airt #a1i * * * *a +it *wf FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 13.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW - LENGTH = 243.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 432.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 418.70 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 13.30 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 10.350 "CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 5.933 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .88 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .33 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .88 r ##iiti}f w4R * ##t #if xx iii } }iiiiiffi *k }## #iii }} } * * # # #fx ♦ii}if * * * } * * # #i #x #iii }} FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 13.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE - 51 »» >COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW« «< »» >TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA« «< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 418.70 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 418.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 9.00 CHANNEL SLOPE _ .0778 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) - 1.00 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR - .300 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) - 1.00 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) _ .88 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) _ .68 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .59 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .22 TC(MIN.) - 10.57 ++*f t+ r#♦ irrx# ar++ titrrx# t}# itiir+ ww}} r# #i }it + + + + + + + + + +ii ♦ + + + ++ + + + + + + ++ +iii# FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 13.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE = 1 »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION (MIN. I = 10.57 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 5.85 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .33 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .88 * # #+rf riir+ rxrxt #rirr + +xw} }riii+i #fwi +i4 }iiiitf www +# #i#titii + +#+iiii # *# ##xi} FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 150.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 435.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 418.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 17.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 6.380 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 8.105 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .47 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .13 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .47 + rrir+ i+ rrara+ arrartirri+ aaaa► ra+ rtti++ rarraaaar +arwir + ++rrraraaaxawaawrrarr FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< »» >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 3 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 6.38 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) - 8.11 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = .13 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .47 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 6.86 8.96 6.510 1.92 1 6.97 9.19 6.405 1.92 1 6.93 9.29 6.361 1.92 1 5.91 12.07 5.372 1.92 1 5.97 13.52 4.995 1.92 1 5.43 15.62 4.549 1.92 2 .88 10.57 5.853 .33 3 .47 6.38 8.105 .13 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 3 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 6.62 6.38 8.105 2 8.03 8.96 6.510 3 8.15 9.19 6.405 4 8.11 9.29 6.361 5 7.60 10.57 5.853 6 7.03 12.07 5.372 7 7.02 13.52 4.995 8 6.38 15.62 4.549 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 8.15 Tc(MIN.) 9.19 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 2.38 aarr +xr +saawrarrrxrraaaarwraa a++ rra+ aa+ r+++ x+ rr +raara + + + + +araaaat +aaxwa +r + ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 11.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE - 51 »»> COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW««< » »>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION 418.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION 405.50 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 125.00 CHANNEL SLOPE = .1000 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) - 5.00 "Z" FACTOR - 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR - .300 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 1.50 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) - 8.15 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) = 1.24 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .95 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.67 TC(MIN.) = 10.86 # # + # #iaifita *t #f arratiatiaaafar ## tai+ iii #alit afa +#a xfiaiaara• #f iii #fiif as ar4 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 11.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE 1 »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 10.86 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 5.75 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.38 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 8.15 + a+ ra: raaaaxxxarair♦ aiaraariafaaaaraarrra+ aaarrraaaa +rraararraaarrxxaraaaarr FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 16.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE - 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS« «< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 135.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION - 420.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 405.50 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 14.50 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 6.162 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 8.289 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .60 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .16 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .60 rararaaaxars+ xrrarrwxrasa +sl +asaxxxaa +aaaarraararx saxats • +aririraaax rrxxa # +: FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 16.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 1 » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< assns:= s= sss= essss====: asssscssssss�s :e= ssasasasssssssaaaa :assn ===== ________ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 6.16 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 8.29 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .16 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .60 r« raaxaaa+ aitaarxaa+ ara #aa +xaxaaaaatats #arraxarraa +aa «ratan +xaxrarrarrarrr +a FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE - 21 » »>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS ««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 255.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 450.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 405.50 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 44.50 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 7.204 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY( INCH/ HOUR) - 7.495 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS).= 2.06 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .61 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.06 + +aaw«aaaratt +t +arts+ tat++ ttttraaaa« aararr+ tttt + +aa + +a «aaaraa +aaaat + +tt + +t ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE ««< » » >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 3 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.20 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 7.49 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .61 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 2.06 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 6.62 8.16 6.917 2.38 1 8.03 10.64 5.827 2.38 1 8.15 10.86 5.750 2.38 1 8.11 10.97 5.714 2.38 1 7.60 12.28 5.314 2.38 1 7.03 13.82 4.923 2.38 1 7.02 15.27 4.617 2.38 1 6.38 17.42 4.240 2.38 2 .60 6.16 8.289 .16 3 2.06 7.20 7.495 .61 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 3 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 8.11 6.16 8.289 2 8.85 7.20 7.495 3 9.01 8.16 6.917 4 10.05 10.64 5.827 5 10.14 10.86 5.750 6 10.09 10.97 5.714 7 9.44 12.28 5.314 8 8.74 13.82 4.923 9 8.62 15.27 4.617 10 7.85 17.42 4.240 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 10.14 Tc(MIN.) 10.86 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.15 +++++ r++ rraw++ ri++ a++ ssaa+ rr: araa+ a♦ ra# ar+ wa* + + + + +a *rrr #a + * *r ** + * *r + #ra + + + ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 17.00 IS CODE - 51 »» >COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW« «< »» >TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 405.50 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 404.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 50.00 CHANNEL SLOPE = .0300 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = 5.00 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = .300 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 2.00 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 10.14 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) _ .86 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 1.48 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = .96 TC(MIN.) = 11.83 riii++ i+t rat rri+ a+# triar***a aai +araraaw * * *a *ai #+rrrrrrf # * *k ++* *iii # +ia # * # +a+ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 17.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 11.83 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) - 5.44 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 3.15 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE 10.14 aar• w++ a+ a +arrsarraraia + +r + +a + +taaa + + +tt Tara* a +rr + + +aa•arrrtrrrr*w *rwaaa + + ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 17.00 IS CODE - 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< = SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW - LENGTH = 315.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 458.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 404.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 54.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) 8.054 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.974 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.01 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .64 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) 2.01 aarr+ aarwra+ aaaarr+ awr * #aattrraaa +aaaa + +ararrw + + +aa +art +r #rrarrrr *ra * +wa + +ar FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 17.00 IS CODE 1 »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< ------------------------------- TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 8.05 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 6.97 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .64 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 2.01 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CPS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 8.11 7.19 7.506 3.15 1 8.85 8.20 6.892 3.15 1 9.01 9.15 6.422 3.15 1 10.05 11.61 5.509 3.15 1 10.14 11.83 5.443 3.15 1 10.09 11.93 5.412 3.15 1 9.44 13.26 5.056 3.15 1 8.74 14.82 4.706 3.15 1 8.62 16.28 4.430 3.15 1 7.85 18.46 4.085 3.15 2 2.01 8.05 6.974 .64 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 9.97 7.19 7.506 2 10.75 8.05 6.974 3 10.83 8.20 6.892 4 10.86 9.15 6.422 5 11.63 11.61 5.509 6 11.71 11.83 5.443 7 11.65 11.93 5.412 8 10.89 13.26 5.056 9 10.09 14.82 4.706 10 9.89 16.28 4.430 11 9.03 18.46 4.085 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 11.71 Tc(MIN.) = 11.83 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.79 +++ trr+ tr+++ trr+ arr++ tt+++ ttw+ at ttrrax+ xatttrr +a + + + + +tt +t + * + +trwwwwxxxttttwt FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 38.00 TO NODE 39.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 100.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 427.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 418.70 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 8.30 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) 5.779 +CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 8.639 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) a .74 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .19 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .74 ++ + + +raa +fraaaa+ star++ r*#*+ aaati + + + +r # * + + + #aaaa+taa ++ + #rta +tart ++ + +aa ++ataa FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 16.00 TO NODE 40.00 IS CODE = 21 »» >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 175.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 420.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 408.40 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 11.60 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) 8.240 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.872 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .56 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .18 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .56 tf+ a+ af+ fa* aaattat * *t +affffaf *ff *a +a +t #tff * *f *aaaai t +a +ff *f * * +a +aa +aa +f +f tff FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 33.00 TO NODE 34.00 IS CODE - 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< ----------------- ---- -- - - -- SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 85.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 450.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 436.80 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE - 13.20 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 4.324 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 5- MINUTES 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 9.485 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .47 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .11 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .47 *iiaaa * * # +Riai #i +a ## iii++ t# t+ t # +f #taairtaf+ +t *aifi+ + * *+ + * *at *tat #i+iitf ►tf ** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 35.00 TO NODE 36.00 IS CODE - 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW— LENGTH = 110.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 458.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION — 440.50 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 17.50 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINOTES) = 4.879 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 5— MINUTES 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY (INCH /HOUR) = 9.485 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .68 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .16 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .68 aat aarr++ raat + + +r + +atrattira!l +aaaart +i +rai# Tara + + + +rr +a + +rra + : + + + + + ++ +irr ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 35.00 TO NODE 37.00 IS CODE 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW — LENGTH = 120.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 458.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 440.90 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 17.10 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 5.287 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 9.150 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .62 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .15 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .62 +f rrraraaat++ ftt+ iirifil arttataaf: aaaaaaaaa+ ra #rrraaala +f! #rflt + + +aaaaaaaaai FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 28.00 TO NODE 29.00 IS CODE - 21 ---------`------------------------------------------------------------------ »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< *USER SPECIFIED(SUBAREA): RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9000 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW— LENGTH = 125.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 471.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION - 455.90 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 15.10 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 1.754 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 5— MINUTES 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 9.485 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .60 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .07 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .60 +iif #tf *aa #i+iaaa art# ++irt +r ++iiif + +aaaa +r #tiff #aka+ #t#ffiof r # #tt *aiaarif ai! FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 28.00 TO NODE 29.00 IS CODE 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 5.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 9.49 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .07 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .60 +araa +aawrraat + + ++ aura + +a +a*atrr + +aarrrrrasrrra +ar r+rrrrrr•rrraaaararrrrrra FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 29.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 190.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 462.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 455.90 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 6.10 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 10.933 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 5.727 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .90 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .35 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .90 rraa + +rtaara +aa + + + +aaaraa+ aura+ x+ aaaaa+ rrrarrra + + + + +raaarta +rr + + + + + + + +ar + +r FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 29.00 IS CODE 1 » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< » » >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 10.93 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) - 5.73 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .35 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .90 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 .60 5.00 9.485 .07 2 .90 10.93 5.727 .35 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 1.14 5.00 9.485 2 1.26 10.93 5.727 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 1.26 TC(MIN.) - 10.93 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .42 END OF STUDY SUMMARY: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) 1.26 Tc(MIN.) = 10.93 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .42 * ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE * ** Q(CFS) Tc(MIN.) 1 1.14 5.00 2 1.26 10.93 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS a+ rrarar ►► ►aa + + +ra► ♦r + ►rrra +arrrrarrrrr r++ r+ arrraxxrrrr +r ++rrrrrrraaaxaxr ►rr RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE Reference: SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1985,1981 HYDROLOGY MANUAL (c) Copyright 1982 -92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 1.3A Release Date: 3/06/92 License ID 1388 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 North Hwy. 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA. 92075 Ph. 858- 259 -8212 Fax: 858- 259 -4812 a +axrr + +r ► ►aaa + +rr ► ► ►aaaa+ DESCRIPTION OF STUDY * * * * +a +rr► ► ►r ► + ►x ►raaaaa ++ • Hydrology Calculations for Double 30" RCP culvert • on Fortuna Ranch Rd. Sta. 1 +68 " • See Exhibit "B" Node 102 6 -9 -2000 ms rr+ rrrraa► ara+r+ r► raaraaaaarrrrrx►►► asa+ traa +ax ►aa +a +► +rrr► ► ►► ►r ► ► ► +aara ++ FILE NAME: 786LARET.DAT TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 9:51 6/ 9/2000 -------------------------------------------------------------------- USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1985 SAN DIEGO MANUAL CRITERIA USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00 6 —HOUR DURATION PRECIPITATION (INCHES) = 3.600 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 6.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS (DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE - .95 SAN DIEGO HYDROLOGY MANUAL "C "— VALUES USED NOTE: ONLY PEAK CONFLUENCE VALUES CONSIDERED aa+ rarxa► raaa++ ar►► a+ aaaarrxraaaaaaaa► rrra► a► a +ax + +arax ► ► ►a +aaaxarraaaaaa ► ►► FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE - 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 NATURAL WATERSHED NOMOGRAPH TIME OF CONCENTRATION WITH 10— MINUTES ADDED = 12.92(MINUTES) INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW — LENGTH = 760.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 498.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 407.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 91.00 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 5.141 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 23.37 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 10.10 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 23.37 + rsawwws+ atrsss+ wwas+ r+ wawww +sa +asawww +wwwai +ssa +w• :aaa +assn +wswwwaa + + +ss +ss FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 102.00 IS CODE = 53 »» >COMPUTE NATURAL MOUNTAIN CHANNEL FLOW««< » »>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION 407.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION 360.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 1070.00 CHANNEL SLOPE _ .0439 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) - 23.37 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) = 3.35 (PER PLATE D -6.3) TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 5.32 TC(MIN.) - 18.24 ++++ t+ rs++ wsw+ ir+ s++ watiis+ awwss++ iwssa+ rwt++ r +ssrt + + +++ +it +srww +sr + + +rrs + ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 102.00 IS CODE 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW««< 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 4.116 =_ SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 23.45 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) 43.43 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 33.55 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) 66.80 TC(MIN) = 18.24 END OF STUDY SUMMARY: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 66.80 Tc(MIN.) = 18.24 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 33.55 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS SECTION 3 PROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNEL HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS aa+ ra+ xra+++ raxxra+ +rrarxrr +a + +awrraa +araa +ra + + +rw +rat + +rrraxxwara + +arrrtrrr HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS - I PROGRAM PACKAGE (C) Copyright 1982 -92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 3.1A Release Date: 2117/92 License ID 1388 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 North Hwy. 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA. 92075 Ph. 858- 259 -8212 Fax: 858- 259 -4812 --------------- - - - - -- TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 9:23 9/ 5/2000 + + + +rx waaa + + +w + + + * +rrwwaa+ DESCRIPTION OF STUDY * * * * * * +ara +t + +rrww +aa +rrrr * Check Cahnnel Capacity and Velocity from node 8 to 9 * PE 786f r + * 100 year storm * See Drainage Area Map. * 9 -5 -2000 ms a++ raxa+ +rrw + + + +a +♦rra + + + + +rwaa +wrrrwwa ttrrrwa +aa + +rw +raa + + + + +r xraa+r +rwrw rrww+ r+ arwa +a +•+wwaaaaarrrwa + +tarxwaaa r +rrwaaa +rrww +w wrarwxwwaaa• +rrwraaaw t+ »»CHANNEL INPUT INFORMATION«« ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL Z1(HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) = 2.00 Z2(HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) = 5.00 BASEWIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 CONSTANT CHANNEL SLOPE(FEET /FEET) _ .081000 UNIFORM FLOW(CFS) - 6.97 MANNINGS FRICTION FACTOR = .0350 NORMAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »> NORMAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .27 FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 6.86 FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 1.57 HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .23 FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 4.43 UNIFORM FROUDE NUMBER = 1.632 PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 72.22 AVERAGED VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .305 SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .571 = = == CRITICAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 7.51 CRITICAL FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 2.24 CRITICAL FLOW HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .30 CRITICAL FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 3.11 CRITICAL DEPTH(FEET) = .36 CRITICAL FLOW PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 65.39 AVERAGED CRITICAL FLOW VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .150 CRITICAL FLOW SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) - .509 aai +ir +rrrrrrira +sar #r +t ++ DESCRIPTION OF STUDY *• * *rrr #rt + :r :t + + + + + :irs #r * Check channel capacity and velocity from node 9 to 11 * PE 786 * 100 Year storm * + * See drainage area map • 9 -5 -2000 ms rtti +rrsr +r :iir #rri +r#rri+ arm+♦ rir+ iarrrrr +ara + +irrr #ar +s # #ar ++ + + +r #rts# ♦### raa# 4it### t# t# iraari rtaatia # #4 ## #rtirrtara #f ## ## #iii #a #4r#itr #iii ####### »»CHANNEL INPUT INFORMATION«« ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL Z I (HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) = 2.00 Z2 (HORI ZONTAL/VERT I CAL) - 5.00 BASEWIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 CONSTANT CHANNEL SLOPE(FEET /FEET) = .165500 UNIFORM FLOW(CFS) = 6.97 MANNINGS FRICTION FACTOR = .0350 ---- --------------- - -- NORMAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »> NORMAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .22 FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 6.51 FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) 1.24 HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .19 FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 5.62 UNIFORM FROUDE NUMBER = 2.269 PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 83.88 AVERAGED VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .490 SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .706 CRITICAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) - 7.51 CRITICAL FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 2.24 CRITICAL FLOW HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .30 CRITICAL FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 3.11 CRITICAL DEPTH(FEET) = .36 CRITICAL FLOW PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 65.39 AVERAGED CRITICAL FLOW VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .150 CRITICAL FLOW SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) = .509 ra : + + + +xxasr +a ++rxxxaar :rr DESCRIPTION OF STUDY xr+sraxx xxxaaaai sr +r rarrxr * Check Channel capacity and velocity from node 11 to 14 * PE 786f * 100 Year storm * See drainage area map. ' 9 -5 -2000 ms ' ra+ arrrxra+++ ia++ a++ aai++++ rrrxaaa++ r+ a# xt• xraarr +ra + + +rxrxrr #a +rxr+r +ra +a t #trxx # ++rrrrt xxx# st++ atxl 4x} aasiiti# xxar# atr ++ +i4r *ata#ir #rrirxixx # *rx#a + +i »»CHANNEL INPUT INFORMATION«« ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL Z1(HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) - 2.00 Z2(HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) - 5.00 BASEWIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 CONSTANT CHANNEL SLOPE(FEET /FEET) _ .141700 UNIFORM FLOW(CFS) = 8.15 MANNINGS FRICTION FACTOR = .0350 NORMAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »> NORMAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .25 FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 6.72 FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) 1.44 HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .21 FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) - 5.65 UNIFORM FROUDE NUMBER = 2.150 PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 99.79 AVERAGED VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .496 SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .742 --------------- CRITICAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: CRITICAL FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 7.76 CRITICAL FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 2.52 CRITICAL FLOW HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .32 CRITICAL FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 3.24 CRITICAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .39 CRITICAL FLOW PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 79.88 AVERAGED CRITICAL FLOW VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .163 CRITICAL FLOW SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .557 + + + :r# +rat * #ai a +raaiaaxaw* DESCRIPTION OF STUDY * *aa +a + +r +ta +r ai aaaat #aaaa * check channel capacity and velocity from node 14 to 17 * PE 786f * 100 Year storm + * See drainage area map * 9 -5 -2000 ms + rat w##+++ a+ +t + + + ++ +a + + ++ratix *aaa + + + #aaiai tar +t +t +aa # #raiaaxxxt #a +a + + + + ++ awi +atrrra4 # # #a #fti#a *aw #iii # +rta #fi #i + #iaaatt +tai *#aia +ti raatatr +t * * * + * * *## » »CHANNEL INPUT INFORMATION«« ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL Z1(HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) = 2.00 Z2(HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) = 5.00 BASEWIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 CONSTANT CHANNEL SLOPE(FEET /FEET) _ .067700 UNIFORM FLOW(CFS) = 10.14 MANNINGS FRICTION FACTOR = .0350 ------------------------------- NORMAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»> NORMAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .34 FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 7.39 FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 2.12 HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .29 FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 4.79 UNIFORM FROUDE NUMBER = 1.579 PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) 115.29 AVERAGED VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .357 SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .698 CRITICAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 8.16 CRITICAL FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 2.97 CRITICAL FLOW HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .36 CRITICAL FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 3.41 CRITICAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .45 CRITICAL FLOW PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 105.57 AVERAGED CRITICAL FLOW VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .181 CRITICAL FLOW SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .632 1 -10 TABLE I -7 (Continued) 1 Construction Good Fair b. Earth, fairly uniform section (1) No vegetation 0.022 0.025 (2) Grass, some weeds 0.025 0.030 (3) Dense weeds or aquatic plants in deep channels 0.030 0.035 9 Sides clean ravel bottom 0.025 0.030 (5) Sides clean, cobble bottom 0.030 0.040 c. Dragline excavated or dredged (1) No vegetation 0.028 0.033 (2) Light brush on banks 0.035 0.050 d. Rock 1 Based on design section 0, 035 (2) Based on actual mean section (a) Smooth and uniform 0.035 0.040 (b) Jagged and irregular 0.040 0.045 Condition Fair Poor e. Channels not maintained, weeds and brush uncut (1) Dense weeds, high as flow depth 0.08 0.12 (2) Clean bottom, brush on sides 0.05 0.08 (3) Same, highest stage of flow 0.07 0.11 (4) Dense brush, high stage 0.10 0.14 S Manning's n .06 NATURAL STREAM CHANNELS Range a. Minor streams 6 (surface width at flood stage, 100 ft) (1) Fairly regular section (a) Some grass and weeds, little or no brush 0.030 0.035 (b) Dense growth of weeds, depth of flow materially greater than weed height 0.035 0.05 (c) Some weeds, light brush on banks 0.035 0.05 (d) Some weeds, heavy brush on banks 0.05 0.07 (e) For trees within channel with branches submerged at high stage, increase all above values by 0.01 0.02 (2) Irregular section, with pools, slight channel meander (a) Channels (a) to (e) above, increase all values about 0.01 0.02 (3) Mountain streams; no vegetation in channel, banks usually steep, trees and brush along banks submerged at high stage (a) Bottom, gravel, cobbles and few boulders (b) Bottom, cobbles with large boulders 0.05 0.07 NOTES: 1. For poor quality construction, use larger values of n. 2. For important work and where accurate determination of water profiles is necessary, the designer is urged to consult the references cited and to select n by comparison of the specific conditions with the channels tested 3. With channel of alignment other than straight, loss of head by resistance forces will be increased A small increase in value of n may be made to allow for the additional loss of energy. Fvschw 3 7-6 Tl+o Contractor's Representative Add tin following paragraph: "The Contractor and Engineer shell provide each other with a local phone number at whl ch they or their representative may be contacted 24 hours a day-" PART 2 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SECTION 200 - ROCK MATERIALS 200 -1.1 General Add: "Alternate Rock Materials - Type "S" as do- cellyeprohlblted in4special Provisions". specifl- 200-1.6 Stone for Rlprep Add: -The protection she it l con form to the f following d In slope CLASSES Rock I I 11/2 Sizes 2 Ton I Ton Ton 4 Ton 0 -5 2 Ton 50 -100 0 -5 1 Ton 95-100 50 -100 50-1 0-5 1/2 Ton — 95 -100 1/4 Ton 200 lb 95 -1 75 lb 25 lb 5 lb I Ib 1/1 1 No. 2 1 No. 3 Ton Backing Oackln 0 -5 50 -100 95 -100 0 -5 25 -75 0 -5 90 -100 25 -75 •Tl+e amount of materiel smaller than the smallest protection shall table theypercentager limit size 4 listed In tin table da h+nntnod on a wolght basis. Compllanco vllh ilia percentage limit shown In the table for all other sizes of tin Individual plecos of nny class of rock slope proloctlon shall be 63- termined by it" ratio of tin numbor of Individual pieces larger than ilia smallest ilzo listed In the table for That class. 11200 -1.6.1 Selection of Iliprap and Filter U1811KOT M5101 'l'5T- i•. - . ._ Filler Blanket (3) Upper Lnyer(s) Opt. I Opt, 2 Vol. Rock Iliprnp Sec. Sec. LL Ft /Sac Class Thick- 200 400 Opt. 3 Layer (1) (2) noss "T" (4) (4) (5) (6) Ito. 3 Pack- Ing .6 3/16" C2 O.G. No. 2 -- Back - 7-0 Ing 1.0 1/4" 113 O.G. -- Fee- 0-9.5 Ing 1.4 3/0" -- D.C. -- - 3/4 ", 1 1/2" 9.5 -11 Light 2.0 1/2" -- P.O. -- 1/4 11/2" 11 -13 Ton 2.7 314" 3/4 ", _ 1/2 1 I /2" 11 J Ton 3.4 1" -- P.O. Sand 15 -17 1 Tan 4.3 t 1/2" -- Type 0 Send 17 -20 2 io++ 5.4 2" — Type 0 Sand i•. - . ._ SECTION 4 CURB INLET SIZING CALCULATIONS & CULVERT SIZE CALCULATIONS # * }Rfi* iii*#} aasa* ri*** R# f} a* of + * } * * *titf ♦ * *iifa*t4ir * * *RR+aif #af riir* *RRR+ HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS - I PROGRAM PACKAGE (C) Copyright 1982 -92 Advanced Engineering Software (sea) Ver. 3.1A Release Date: 2/17/92 License ID 1388 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 North Hwy. 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA. 92075 Ph. 858- 259 -8212 Fax: 858- 259 -4812 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 11:23 6/ 9/2000 ___ --- ________===== vvc= ccs vvvav vvc= ===== vvvcs= csa= =a== == =_____ Ra * + + +rrrRR * *a +rrr +RRR *a *r DESCRIPTION OF STUDY +rrr + + *rRRRRRr + *r +r + + +++ ++ * Drainage Channel Inlet size calculations. ' * Total interception ' * 6 -9 -2000 ms Node 8 ' aar+ t+ r* rRaaaaa+ r+ RRR*+ i+* rr* iR * * *a * +f # + +Raaaatara + # * *R * * * ** *iii + + *r *R * * * * +t »» FLOWBY CATCH BASIN INLET CAPACITY INPUT INFORMATION«« --------------------------------------------- ---- ---- --- ---- -- ------- -- - - - -- Curb Inlet Capacities are approximated based on the Bureau of Public Roads nomograph plots for flowby basins and sump basins. STREETFLOW(CFS) - 6.40 GUTTER FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .32 BASIN LOCAL DEPRESSION(FEET) _ .25 FLOWBY BASIN WIDTH(FEET) = 23.85 » »CALCULATED BASIN WIDTH FOR TOTAL INTERCEPTION = 23.9 »»CALCULATED ESTIMATED INTERCEPTION(CFS) = 6.4 ++++ r# arrtwx# at # + + +aaffaafxaa # + + + + +aa♦rrrw #ar as it + +iaaa :araata #aaaaa + + + +# + +# HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS - I PROGRAM PACKAGE (C) Copyright 1982 -92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 3.1A Release Date: 2/17/92 License ID 1388 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 North Hwy. 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA. 92075 Ph. 858- 259 -8212 Fax: 858- 259 -4812 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 10: 2 6/ 9/2000 raatt # +a +aa ++rantxaaaai +aa DESCRIPTION OF STUDY aaaf aaaattwaa #r +txtaaarrtr • Check Capacity of Double 30" RCP Culvert ' • Sta. 1 +68 Fortuna Ranch Rd. a • See Exhibit "B" node 102 for location. 6 -9 -2000 me ti # ►rt +taa #rraf iwx *atattf aair * # # # +r+ +tfa *a * # # *a #iiaaf aw xtrwi * *xatt #ixf #tfa rrx+ t+ a+ taaafax : +t + +r +atrxaaa +trfattxa #a +aarf aarwwaararrxartfa wxwaaaa +rraraf »»PIPEFLOW HYDRAULIC INPUT INFORMATION«« ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- PIPE DIAMETER(FEET) - 2.500 PIPE SLOPE(FEET /FEET) _ .0302 PIPEFLOW(CFS) = 33.40 MANNINGS FRICTION FACTOR .013000 CRITICAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: CRITICAL DEPTH(FEET) = 1.97 CRITICAL FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 4.141 CRITICAL FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 2.049 CRITICAL FLOW PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 752.06 CRITICAL FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 8.066 CRITICAL FLOW VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) = 1.01 CRITICAL FLOW HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) = 2.02 CRITICAL FLOW SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) = 2.98 NORMAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- NORMAL DEPTH(FEET) = 1.20 FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 2.34 FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) - 2.498 FLOW PRESSURE + MOMENTUM (POUNDS) - 998.90 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 14.285 FLOW VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) = 3.169 HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .94 FROUDE NUMBER = 2.602 SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) = 4.37 SECTION 5 REFERENCE DATA & CHARTS TABLE 2 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS ,(RATIONAL METHOD) DEVELOPED AREAS (URBAN) Land Use Residential: Single Family Multi -Units Mobile homes Rural (lots greater than 1/2 acre) Commercial(2) 80% Impervious Industrial(2) 90% Impervious Coefficient, C Soil Group (1) A B C 0 40 .45 .50 .55 45 .50 .6o .70 45 .50 .55 .65 30 .35 i 40� 45 70 .75 .80 .85 80 .85 .90 .95 NOTES: (I)Soil Group maps are available at tile 'offices of the Department of Public Works. (2)Where actual conditions deviate significantly from the tabulated impervious- ness values of 80% or 90%, the values given for coefficient C. may be revised by multiplying 80% or 90% by the ratio of actual imperviousness to the tabulated imperviousness. However, in no case shall the final coefficient be less than 0.50. For example; Consider commercial property on D soil group. Actual imperviousness - 50% Tabulated imperviousness = 80% Revised C = 50 x 0.85 = 0,53 80 IV -A -9 APPENDIX IX -B Rev. 5/81 TABLE 11. -- INTERPRETATIONS FOR LAND MANAGEMENT -- Continued See footnotes at end of table. 37 Limitations for map Soil hydro- Erodibility conversion symbol logic from brush to group grass RaA Ramona sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes----------- - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RaB Ramona sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes----------- - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RaC Ramona sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes----------- - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RaC2 Ramona sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes, eroded--- - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. Ra D2 Ramona sand,), loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes, eroded-- - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RcD Ramona gravelly sandy loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes- - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RcE Ramona gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RdC Rcdding gravelly loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes------- - - - - -- D Severe 9 - - - -- Moderate. ReE edding cobbly loam, 9 to 30 percent slopes-------- - - - - -- D Severe 9 - - - -- Moderate. RfF Redding cobbly loam, dissected, 15 to 50 percent D Severe 1 - - - -- Moderate. slopes. RhC Redding -Urban land complex, 2 to 9 percent slopes: Redding-------------- ---- ------- ------ ------- - ----- D Urban land---------- ----- --- --------- -- ---- -------- D RhE Redding-Urban land complex, 9 to 30 percent slopes: Redding------------ --------------------- ---- ------ D Urbanland----------- ------------------------- - - - - -- D RkA leiff fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes------- - - - - -- B Severe 16 - - -- Slight. Rk8 eiff fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes------- - - - - -- B Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RkC eiff fine sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes------- - - - - -- B Severe 16 - - -- Slight. Rm Ziverwash ------------------------------------------ - - - - -- A Severe 2, 4 -- Severe. RoA lositas fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes----------- - - - - -- A Severe 2 RrC lositas fine sand, hummocky, 5 to 9 percent slopes- - - - - -- A Severe 2 RsA lositas loamy coarse sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes--- - - - - -- A Severe 2 RsC ositas loamy coarse sand, 2 to 9 percent slopes--- - - - - -- A Severe 2 RsD ositas loamy coarse sand, 9 to 15 percent slopes --- - -. - -- A Severe 2 RUG ough broken land---------------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. SbA alinas clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes----------- - - - - -- C Moderate 2 - -- Slight. 1/ SbC alinas clay loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes----------- - - - - -- C Moderate 2 - -- Slight. l/ ScA alinas clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes---------------- - - - - -- C Slight- - - - - -- Slight. 1/ Sc8 alinas clay, 2 to 5 percent slopes---------------- - - - - -- C Slight- - - - - -- Slight. 1/ SnG an Miguel- Exchequer rocky silt loamy, 9 to 70 percent slopes: San Miguel------------------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. Exchequer-------------------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. slopes, eroded. SpG2 Sheephead rocky fine sandy loam, 30 to 6S percent C Severe 1 - - - -- Moderate. 4/ slopes, eroded. SrD Sloping gullied land------------------------------- - - - - -- B Severe 2 - - - -- Severe. 4/ SsE Soboba stony loamy sand, 9 to 30 percent slopes---- - - - - -- A Severe 2 - - - -- Moderate StG Steep gullied land--------------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. SuA Stockpen gravelly clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes- - - - - -- D Moderate 2 - -- Slight. SUB Stockpen gravelly clay loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes- - - - - -- D Moderate 2 - -- Slight. SVE Stony l and----------------------------------------- - - - - -- A Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. TeF Terrace escarpments-------------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. Tf Tidal flats---------------------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe 2, 4 To E2 Tollhouse rocky coarse sandy loam, 5 to 30 percent C Severe 9 - - - -- Severe. slopes, eroded. TOG rollhouse rocky coarse sandy loam, 30 to 65 percent C Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. slopes. TUB ujunga sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes---------------- - - - - -- A Severe 2 - - - -- Slight. Ur Urban laud--------- --------- -- -------------------- ---- D VaA Visalia sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes---------- - - - - -- 8 Severe 16 - - -- Slight. See footnotes at end of table. 37 'EAB LE I1. -- I NTI:RPRETATIONS FOR LAND MANAGEMENT [Numerals indicate soil properties or qualities that affect erodibility. Numeral 1 refers to slope; 2 to surface layer texture; 9 to depth to hard rock, or a hardpan, or any layer that restricts permeability; 16 to grade of structure in the surface layer. Absence of rating means no valid interpretations can be made] Flap Soil Limitations for sMmbo Hydro- Erodibility conversion logic from brush to group grass AcG AtC Acid igneous rock land_________ _____________ ------- - -� - -" ltamont clay, 5 to 9 D Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. AtD percent slopes__________ ___________ ltamont clay, 9 to 15 D Slight- - -____ Slight. I g / AtD2 percent slopes - - - - - -- --- ---- - - - - -- ltamont clay, 9 to 15 D Slight - - - - - -- Slight. T/ AtE percent slopes, eroded ------------ ltamont clay, 15 to 30 D Sliht- - - -___ Slight. I/ --,At E2 percent slopes------------ ------- ltamont clay 5 to 30 y, D Moderate 1 -__ Slight. 1/ AtF percent slopes, eroded----- -_____ ltamont clay, 30 to 50 D Moderate 1 - -- Slight. 1 g AuC percent slopes P derson very D Severe 1- - - -- _/ Moderate— gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes. A Severe 16 - - -- Slight. AuF derson very gravelly sandy loam, 9 to 4S percent slopes. A Severe 16 - - -- Moderate. 2/ AwC uld clay, 5 to 9 percent slopes______________________ D Slight ------- Slight AyE BaG Auld stony clay, 9 t- 30 percent Badland ------------- D Fb 1 derate Slight. BbE -slopes ------------------- -- Bancas stony loam, S to 30 percent slopes- - - - - -- D C Severe 1----- Severe 16 Severe. BbE2 Bancas stony loam, S to 30 percent slopes, eroded-- - - - - -- - - -- Severe 16 Fbderate. BbG Bancas stony loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes--------- - ----- � - - -- Severe 1 Moderate. BbG2 Bancas stony loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes, eroded- - - - - -- P P C - - - -- Severe 1- Moderate. BeE Blasingame loam, 9 to 30 percent slopes----------- ------ D - - -- Severe 16 Moderate. BgE Blasingame stony loam, 9 to 30 percent slo es---- ________ P D ---- Severe 16 Slight. BgF B1C Blasingame stony loam, 30 to 50 percent Slopes ----------- D - - -- Severe 1 ----- Moderate. Moderate. B1C2 Bonsall sandy loam, 2 to 9 ercent slo es---------- - - - - -- P P Bonsall sandy loam, 2 D Severe 9 -___- Slight. B1D2 to 9 percent slopes, eroded-- - - - - -- Bonsall sandy loam, 9 to 15 D Severe 9_____ Slight. BmC percent slopes, eroded- - - - - -- P P Bonsall sandy loam, thick surface, 2 to 9 D Severe 9 -- - -- Slight. percent slopes. D Moderate 2 --- Slight. BnB Bonsall- Fallbrook sandy loans, 2 to 5 percent slopes: Bonsall------------- ---- ------------ --- ------------ Fallbrook-------------------------------------------- D Severe 9- ---' Slight. Boc Boomer loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes----------- ------ ------ C C Severe 9 - - - -- Moderate 2 Slight. BoE BrE Boomer loam, 9 to 30 percent slopes___________ ___________ Boomer C - -- Moderate 1 - -- Slight. Slight, BrG stony loam, 9 to 30 percent slopes________ ________ Boomer C Moderate 1 - -- Slight. Bsc stony loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes--------- - ----- eos anko clay, 2 to 9 C Severe I - - - -- Moderate. BsD percent slopes-------------- -------- Bosanko clay, 9 to 15 D Moderate 16 -- Slight. 1/ BsE percent slopes________ _____________ Bosanko clay, to 30 p Moderate 16 -- Slight. 1/ T BtC Y, percent slopes__________ __________ Bosanko D Moderate 1 - -- Slight. 11 BUB stony clay, 5 to 9 percent slopes---------- ------ Bull Trail sandy loam, 2 D Moderate 16 -- Slight. 3/ BuC to 5 percent slopes------- - - ---- Bull Trail sandy loam, 5 to 9 C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. 4/ BuD2 percent slopes------- - ----- Bull Trail sandy loam, 9 to 15 C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. 4/ BuE2 percent slopes, eroded - - -- Bull Trail sandy loam, 15 to 30 C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. 4/ CaB percent slopes, eroded - -- Calpine coarse sandy loam, 2 to 5 C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. 4/ CaC percent slopes --------- Calpine coarse sandy loam, 5 to 9 B Moderate 2 - -- Slight. 4/ CaC2 percent slopes P P es--- - - - - -- Calpine coarse sandy loam, 5 to 9 B Moderate 2 - -- Slight. 4/ percent slopes, e eroded. 8 Moderate 2 - -- Slight. 4/ See footnotes at end of table. 32 COUNTY OF SAN SANITATION b 00-YEAR 24-1- I0,1JR PRECIPITATION FLOOD CONTROL r 100 - ��EAR 24 -HOUR 33" 451 301 15' 45' V..'. U.S. DGPARTmEP NATIONAL OCCASIC ANO AT IAL STUDIES UNANCII, OFFICS: OF It 301 "'20./ [: UrLUt1IMLS Or PRECIPITATION If-I JFENTHS OF AN INCH Ilfl" !15' 3n1 li' 117' I,!;, 30' 151 116" COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF SAf11TATION G 9 (� (� (D Y�� �e P` EGIFl,IT�aTI fiil FLOOD CONTROL 1 ''20./ ISOPLUVIALS OF 100 —YEAR 6 -HOUR rn. '1 i ryRECIs IIri, TI011 II'i EIAT►I,i GF AN FX1111 45, It 3� zu 5. \(}V•G F 35 301 i 3Q �� _/ ��• /-�, ��pJI��J� / SAN CL X7.5• \C(� 151 U I ' — E SC 14=0 I 3 ' In --! / 33° I 30 1' 'BONA I p_40 •��3?vt .�� cN �� ` 1 /r� •- it V/ ♦�• k2 1 \1 20, �) 45 451 L MON LILU P,,,. ,a nF If U.S. DEPARTMEN 1. OF COMMERCE l I .'' IA�V.• ;,, � � NATIONAL OCEANIC AND AT.' OSPIIERIC ADVINISTRATION // / 1\ /". "•.,L I I "� O - 'ECIAL STVDIES DRANCN. OFFICE OF II DROLOGY. NATIONAL 4'EATIIER SERVICE At ',JIto 301 20 95 1181 451 301 15' 7 ll° 115' 301 151 116' /// 9L 31 •38S Fccf � Tc ` H J — S000 Tc = Time of c017cc1711a }ion —4000 L Lcnglh of wale shed H • D/fPcrence /n elcvafien along — J000 cf/ecl/rc s/ooc //ne (Scc Appcndi)r X -B) T L � Mlles Fccl /Jouns I Minu/cs — zaoo I 4 —}— Za0 3 300 w 200 y L SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL DISTRICT SERVICES DESIGN MANUAL APPROVED '3• l� /�r%�r< z DATE /BO WA /a0 90 80 70 w SD 410 30 •2a 1B /6 /a /2 9 B 7 6 _s 4 3 NOMOGRAPH FOR DETERMINATION OF TIME OF CONCENTRATION (Tc) FOR NATURAL WATERSHEDS 12 ll� APPFUniV v_n /0 - /000 900 B00 700 Soo \ S -Soo - Ooo - 200 \ 2 -loo / SDOO \ 'a�oo X000 \ Sp OS \ 40 2000 \. 1900 • 30 NOT /600 uFOR NATURAL WAT -RSI 1200 20 ADD TEN MINUTES TO /000 COMPUT OF CON- BOO IONTIME __'_� l J, 60o - 10 500 400 300 w 200 y L SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL DISTRICT SERVICES DESIGN MANUAL APPROVED '3• l� /�r%�r< z DATE /BO WA /a0 90 80 70 w SD 410 30 •2a 1B /6 /a /2 9 B 7 6 _s 4 3 NOMOGRAPH FOR DETERMINATION OF TIME OF CONCENTRATION (Tc) FOR NATURAL WATERSHEDS 12 ll� APPFUniV v_n INTENSITY4UMTION DESIGN CHART 1C. L : '• -rrT J�...� .. j f ITdTrTn.T�i`7 -1.1,4 �kT.ttr.,mrtmr -. . . u. '.. MOT -.645 ! Equation: I' •= 7.44 P6 D I Intensity (In. /Hr.) kip, n�llr� P6 = 6 Hr. Precipitation (In. D z Duration (Min.) �q i fill911!1 1i11111lI ���� i li� l! 1p 14 iiill I!!I I lil II I �1e I il9 i9�11�� I��I 119!!11 III�I IR Il�l� I!Ice3�����1 I ACC =0R'�0 C�'EJ' I I Iii I I I I C7C! �C 0 :Nil; 111111 Bon = �I I March 1902 Directions for Application: 1) From precipitation naps determine 6 hr. and 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrolo, Manual (10, 51) and 100 yr. maps included in Design and Procedure 1lanual). 2) Adjust 6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of 45% to 65% nF the 24 hr. precipitation. (Rot rpplicable to Desert) 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on the right side of the chart. 1) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines. i) This line is the intensity- duration curve for the location being analyzed. ,pplication Form: 1) Selected Frequency l�r• ) P6 in., P24= T-2- . *P6 P24 ) Adjusted *Pfi 3 -�o in. tc . 13 min. I =• 5.12 in /hr. *Not Applicable to Desert Region — APPENDIX XI IV -A -14 SECTION 6 DRAINAGE AREA & NODE MAPS rr'll n , Y.• 1 �s At b i , I.j NPpoEessraN �a omNo. 29571 � Ezp_ 03/31/03 A GRAPHIC SCALE I " =50' r CIVIL ___ _ qTE OF CAl1f� IT ,OR 950 --- - -� REV[sLONS F -RA- DATE. AF.FEaENSes a <ie 11415 AREFA, e _ HOLLOW ROAD cl I b) BENCHMARK SCALE — APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPAF .PTION: CO BE NCNMARK "OC -OOT3" PLA NS'B PREPARED UNDERF THE SUPERVISION OF' RECOMMENDED APPROVED HYDROLOGY NODE MAP FOR: CH ISELEO EOUARE ED OP DE NEADWAL.L „ORxzONax =.___ Da TE:...._._..___. Bv' ............._.__.... `�.ev: TPM 98.272 ADAM'S RUN !ON : SW CORNER EL CAMINO DEL NORTE S RANCHO SANTA FE R.C.E. NO �.9S2Z__. DATE : pgTE: ROAp WAYNE PAECO E %P....1.3.7.:A]. 999.4>E RATLIM: UECSDE WORK PROJECT IVD 5714 —G I01� _ NEERING, INC. CONK JCTION IRSTING & A' �NGINEERING, INC. SAN DIEGO, CA RIVERSIDE, CA VENTURA,CA TRACY,CA LANCASTER,CA 2414 Vine7ud Ave. Suite G 490 E Prinalmd Ct. 1645 P2C& Ave 392 W. Unh Rd. 42156 ION St W. Escondido, CA 92029 (760) 746-4955 Suite 7 Comm, CA 91719 Suite 105 Dxnud• CA 93033 Suite 19 Tnry, CA 95376 Unit K Waste, CA 93534 ('.60) 7469806 FAx (909) 3714890 (9D9) 3712168 flx (805) 4866475 (805) 4869016 (209) 839-2U90 WS) 726.9676 fAx (209) 839.2895 fm (80$) 726-0246 F.0 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED FOUR -UNIT RANCHO FORTUNA DEVELOPMENT OLIVENHAIN, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT 16885 WEST BERNARDO DRIVE SAN DIEGO, CA 92127 Prepared by: CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 CTE JOB NO. 10 -2972 .. ...........-... _. SEPTEMBER 16, 1998 A TABLE OF CONTENTS INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ............................................................................................ Page I 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES .................. ........................................ 1.1 Introduction Page 2 1.2 Scope of Services Page 2 ..........................................I I ...................................................... Page 2 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... Page 2 3.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS ............................ ...........................Page 3.1 Field Investigation ................................................................................................ 3 3.2 Seismic Refraction Surveys Page 3 .................................................................................. Page 3 4.0 GEOLOGY ............................ ............................... 4.1 General Setting Page 4 ...................................................................................................... 4.2 Geologic Conditions Page 4 ............................................................................................. 4.2.1 Topsoils Page 4 .................................................................................................. 4.2.2 Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics Page 4 .............................. ...........................Page 4.3 Groundwater Conditions 5 .......................................... ............................................ 4.4 Seismic Refraction Surveys Results and Rippability Assessment .. Page 5 .... ................... 4.5 Geologic Hazards .................................................................................................. Page 5 4.5.1 General Geologic Hazards Observation Page 7 ...................... ...........................Page 4.5.2 Local and Regional 7 Faulting ........... 4 ............................ ...........................Page .5.3 Earthquake Accelerations 8 ................................................. .................... 4.5.4 Liquefaction Evaluation Page 9 ....................................................................... 4.5.5 Seismic Settlement Evaluation Page 10 ............................................................ 4.5.6 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation Page 10 ......................................................... 4.5.7 Landsliding or Rocksliding ........... Page 11 4.5.8 Compressible or Expansive Soils Page I I .......................................................... .............................. ...........................Page I I 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 5.1 General ..................... ...........................Page 12 .................... Page 12 ....................Page 12 ....................Page 12 .....I ..............Page 13 ............ I ............................ 52 Grading and Earthwork 5.3 Site Preparation ................................................ 5.4 Site Excavation 5.5 Fill Placement and Compaction ....................... 5.6 Fill Materials 5.7 Foundations and Slab Recommendations........ 5.7.1 Foundations..... .... ....................... ...........................Page 14 ....................... ...........................Page 14 ....................... ...........................Page 15 .................... Page 15 ....................Page 16 ....................Page 16 ............................................................. 5.7.2 Foundation Settlement 5.7.3 Foundation Setback 5.7.4 Concrete Slabs 5.8 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressure--.-- ........................ ...........................Page 16 ........................ ...........................Page 17 -e IL TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 5.9 Exterior Flatwork ...................................... ............................... ...........................Page 18 5.10 Drainage ............................................................................. ............................... Page 18 5.11 Asphalt Pavements ............................................................. ............................... Page 19 5.12 Slopes ...................................................... ............................... ...........................Page 19 5.13 Construction Observation ....................... ............................... ...........................Page 20 5.14 Plan Review ........................................... ............................... ...........................Page 20 6.0 LIMITATIONS OF I NVESTIGATION ............... ............................... ...........................Page 21 FIGURES FIGURE l SITE INDEX MAP FIGURE 2 EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP FIGURE 3 RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL APPENDICES APPENDIX A REFERENCES CITED APPENDIX B EXPLORATION LOGS APPENDIX C STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING PROJECTS t Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page I Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 INVESTIGATION SUMMARY This investigation was performed to provide site - specific geotechnical information for the proposed four -unit residential development. Based on our findings, this project is feasible, from a geotechnical viewpoint, if the recommendations presented in this report are implemented. Our investigation found that topsoil and units of the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics underlie the site. Surficial topsoils were found to consist generally of moist, loose, clayey silty sands with gravel with abundant organics. Removal of topsoils will be necessary before construction may begin. The maximum observed depth of surficial soils requiring removal was approximately two feet below grade (fbg). Units of the Santiago Peak Volcanics, underlying the topsoils, generally excavated as dry, sandy clay to silty sands with coarse gravel and cobble -sized fragments. The Santiago Peak Volcanics were observed decreasingly less weathered with increasing depth beneath the surface. Groundwater was not encountered in our borings to the total depths explored (approximately eight and %: fbg). Although groundwater levels will likely fluctuate during periods of precipitation, groundwater is not expected to affect the proposed development if recommendations regarding drainage are carried out during construction. With respect to geologic and seismic hazards, the site is considered as safe as any within the San Diego County area, a region of moderate to high seismic risk. Based on the geologic findings and reference review no active surface faults are known to exist at the site. CTROI ECTS\10- ?97TRPT_PR ELIM INA R Y GEOTECH.DOC J Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1993 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.1 Introduction Page 2 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 This report presents the results of our investigations and provides conclusions and geotechnical engineering criteria for the proposed development. It is our understanding that the site is to be developed by constructing four, one- and two -story, wood -frame residential structures and associated improvements (including utilities, landscaping, and driveway and sidewalk areas). Specific recommendations for excavations fill placement and foundation design for the proposed improvements are presented in this report. The investigation for this report included field exploration, laboratory testing, geologic hazard evaluation, and engineering analysis. Appendix A contains a list of references cited in this report. 1.2 Scope of Services The scope of services provided includes: • Review of readily available geologic and soils reports pertinent to the site and adjacent areas. • Exploration of subsurface conditions to the depths influenced by the proposed construction. • Definition of the general geology and evaluation of potential geologic hazards at the site. • Soil engineering design criteria for the proposed improvements. • Preparation of this summary report (with geotechnical construction recommendations) regarding the investigations performed. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The approximately 10 -acre site is north of Fortuna Ranch Road, across from its intersection with Akita Lane in the Olivenhain area in the City of Encinitas. In general, the site slopes downward toward the southwest. Approximate site elevations range from 476 feet above mean sea level (msl) C9PROJECTS�III- 2972\RPT PRELIMINARY GEOTECH.DOC , Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 3 Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 at the northeastern comer of the property to 387 feet above msl at the southwestern comer. Figures 1 and 2 are maps showing the location and proposed layout of the site. Several hard, relatively unaltered outcrops of volcanic rock were observed on the Northem half of the site. Access to the site is via Fortuna Ranch Road, a dirt and gravel road forming the southern property boundary. A second dirt and gravel road forms the eastern site boundary. 3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 3.1 Field Investigation Field exploration, conducted July 27, 1998, included site reconnaissance, the observation and logging of ten shallow test pits, and five seismic refraction traverses. The test pits were excavated using a conventional backhoe to a maximum depth of approximately eight and % fbg. Geologists from this office logged soils in the field. Field descriptions and classifications were modified, where appropriate, to reflect laboratory test results. Exploration logs including descriptions of the soil and field - testing data are included in Appendix B. Approximate exploration locations are shown on Figure 2. 3.2 Seismic Refraction Surveys A Soil Test MD -1 I Signal Enhancement Seismograph was used during our seismic refraction surveys. The length of the five seismic traverses ranged from 70 to 100 feet. Approximate exploration locations are shown on Figure 2. C PROJECTS 10- 2072�RPT_PRELIMINARY GEOTECKOOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 4 Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 GEOLOGY 4.1 General Setting The site lies within the northern coastal portion of San Diego County area. Landforms near the site consist generally of uplifted marine terraces. These terraces generally parallel the modem coastline and are locally dissected by intermittent streams and lagoons. The areal topography generally slopes down to the west and south. 4.2 Geologic Conditions Based on geologic mapping by Tan and Kennedy (1996) soils consist of Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. However, based on our observations a surficial layer of topsoils overlies the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. The nature and depth of basement rocks below the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics are unknown. 4.2.1 Topsoils Topsoils were observed to depths of about one to two fbg. In general, these soils were found to consist of moist, loose, clayey, silty sands with abundant organics. Topsoils are not suitable, in their current state, for support of structures or additional fill. We recommend removal of these soils. However, they may be re -used as fill onsite if they are screened of organic contamination and oversize debris (greater than three inches in diameter). C.TROJECM III- 2972.RPT PR ELIM INA RY GEOTECH. DOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 5 Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 4.2.2 Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics Several sub -units of the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics were observed underlying topsoils. These included residual soils (forming from the in -place decomposition of the bedrock), volcanic rock, and volcanic tuffs. Each of these sub -units was observed to become less weathered with increasing depth beneath the surface. These soils excavated as sandy clays to silty sands with coarse gravel to cobble -sized fragments. 4.3 Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was not encountered in any of our exploratory test pits to the maximum depth explored of eight and %: fbg. Groundwater is not expected to affect the proposed development provided proper drainage is maintained. 4.4 Seismic Refraction Survey Results and Rippability Assessment Presented in the tables l and 2 below are the results and interpretations of our seismic refraction survey traverses. In general, we were able to resolve two different velocity layers from each traverse. However, interpretation the data was made difficult by the presence of the previously mentioned bedrock knobs. Table I below presents our interpretation of the "raw" seismic refraction data. Noticeable increases in velocity (from 1100 — 2000 feet/second to 2750 — 6000 feet/second were observed at approximate depths of 2 — 3.4 tbg. Weathered volcanics typically have a velocity of 2,000 -6,000 feet/second (ft/s). Solid volcanic rock typically has a velocity of 6.000 - 20,000 ft/s. Therefore, data from the test pits and the seismic traverses suggest that hard volcanic bedrock will C: PROJECTS'%19- 2972`RPT PRELIMINARY GEOTECH.DOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 6 Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 be encountered at depths of 10 to 17 fbg in the areas investigated. However, based on surface observations of outcrops, we anticipate solid volcanic rock will be encountered locally at shallower depths. TABLE 1 PRELIMINARY RIPPABILITY ASSESSMENT Seismic Depth of Layers Traverse No. (feet) Rippability Assessment 0 -3.1 Rippable ST -1 3 +i17 Rippable to Marginally Rippable Non - Rippable 0-2 Rippable ST -2 2'— 10.4 Rippable to Marginally Rippable +10.4 Non - Rippable 04 Rippable ST -3 4 Rippable to Marginally Rippable 0 -3.4 Rippable ST -4 3.4'-616 Rippable to Marginally Rippable Non - Rippable 0 -3 Rippable ST -5 Y -17 Rippable to Marginally Rippable +17 Non - Rippable Presented on Table 2 is our interpretation of the data correlated to a Caterpillar D -9 with mounted hydraulic No. 9 ripper in igneous rocks (specifically volcanics). Caterpillar Tractor Company developed the correlation tables used. Velocities of less than 4,500 feet per second (fps) are considered to be rippable. Velocities between 4,500 and 5,500 fps are considered marginally rippable and may require blasting. Velocities of greater than 5,500 fps will most likely require blasting. C.'PROIECTS'In- 29721•RPr PRELIMINARY GEOTECH.DOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 7 Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 TABLE 2 DATA FROM SEISMIC TRAVERSES Traverse Approximate Layer Velocities Depth Length of Maximum No. Elevation (feet) Traverse Depth V, V_. V3 D, D, (feet above (feet) Explored msl) (feet) ST -1 460 1300 3000 6000 3.1 17 100 30+ ST -2 451 2000 2750 6000 2 10.4 80 25+ ST -3 444 1300 6000 4 70 20+ ST -4 434 1500 4000 7000 3.4 16 80 25+ ST -5 410 1100 2250 8000 3 17 loo 30+ NOTES: V, - Velocity in feet per second of first layer of materials. V_ - Second layer velocity. V, - Third layer velocity. D, - Depth in feet to base of first layer. D, - Depth to base of second layer. 4.5 Geologic Hazards 4.5.1 General Geologic Hazards Observation From our investigation it appears that geologic hazards at the site are primarily limited to those caused by violent shaking from earthquake generated ground motion waves. The potential for damage from displacement or fault movement beneath the proposed structures should be considered low due to the absence of any known active surface faults in the immediate site area. C PROJECTS \10 - 2972'.RPT_PRELINIINARY GEOTECH.DOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 8 Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 4.5.2 Local and Regional Faulting Based on our site reconnaissance, evidence from our explorations, and a review of appropriate geologic literature, it is our opinion that the site is not on known fault traces. The Rose Canyon Fault, approximately six miles to the west, is the closest known active fault (Jennings, 1987). Other principal active regional faults and fault zones are the San Clemente, Coronado Banks, Elsinore, San Jacinto, and San Andreas. According to the California Division of Mines and Geology, a fault is zoned as active if it displays evidence of activity in the last 11,000 years (Hart, 1994). Table 3 is a summary, including the seismic characteristics, of the principal regional faults considered most likely to rupture and possibly induce strong ground shaking at the site during the useful life of the proposed construction. Estimated probable earthquake magnitudes are from California Division of Mines and Geology Website (January 14, 1997) except the San Clemente Fault (from Greensfelder, 1974). C: \PR0TECTS %I0- 2972%RPT_PRELIM INA RY GEOTECH. DOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Pane 9 Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 TABLE 3 SEISMICITY FOR MAJOR FAULTS FAULT or FAULT ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PEAK BEDROCK REPEATABLE ZONE DISTANCE PROBABLE ACCELERATION HIGH GROUND (miles) AND EARTHQUAKE (in G- forces) ACCELERATION DIRECTION MAGNITUDE (in G- forces) FROM SITE Rose Canyon 8W 6.9 0.418 0.278 Elsinore 25 NE 6.7 0.106 0. log Coronado 22 Shy 6'7 0.178 O.IIg Banks San Jacinto 50 NE 6.7 0.048 0.04g San Clemente 60 SW 7.0 0.078 0.078 San Andreas 70 NE 7.3 O.OSg O.OSg 4.5.3 Earthquake Accelerations We have analyzed the possible bedrock accelerations at the site using procedures outlined in Ploessel and Slosson (1974). For the intended use, it is our opinion that the most significant seismic event would be a 6.9 moment magnitude earthquake on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. This event could produce estimated peak bedrock accelerations of 0.418 and repeatable high ground accelerations of 0.27g. C, PRO] ECr51116247?tRPT_ PR ELIM INA RY GEOTECH.DOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 10 Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1993 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 4.5.4 Liquefaction Evaluation Liquefaction occurs when saturated fine - grained sands or silts lose their physical strengths during earthquake induced shaking and behave as a liquid. This is due to loss of point -to -point grain contact and transfer of normal stress to the pore water. Liquefaction potential varies with water level, soil type, material gradation, relative density, and probable intensity and duration of ground shaking. Based on the generally dense nature of the underlying on -site soils and the absence of a permanent shallow groundwater condition, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction should be considered low in all areas of the project. 4.5.5 Seismic Settlement Evaluation Seismic settlement occurs when loose to medium dense granular soils densify during seismic events (earthquakes). The underlying on -site materials were generally found to be medium dense to very dense and are not considered likely to experience significant seismic settlement. Therefore, in our opinion, the potential for seismic settlement resulting in damage to site improvements should be considered low. C IPROJECTS%10- 2972\RPT PRELINIINARY GEOTEC)LDOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page I I Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2977 4.5.6 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation The site is not near any significant bodies of water that could induce Seiche (oscillatory waves) damage. Because of the site's distance from the ocean (approximately one mile) and elevation above sea level, the potential for tsunami damage at the site is considered remote 4.5.7 Landsliding or Rocksliding During our investigation, active landslides were not encountered. Additionally, active slides have not been mapped in the immediate area of the site (Tan and Giffen, 1995). According to Tan and Giffen (1995), the site area is designated as marginally susceptible to landsliding. However, the lack of significant steep natural slopes decreases the probability of landsliding on this site. Cut slopes should be evaluated during grading operations by the geotechnical representative to verify conditions are as anticipated. If potential adverse slope conditions were observed, alternate recommendations may be warranted. 4.5.8 Compressible and Expansive Soils Based on geologic observation and laboratory testing of similar soils from nearby lots, Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanic materials exhibit very low to low compressibility and expansion characteristics and are considered suitable for support of fill and improvements. Surficial topsoil /fill soils were found to be low to moderately expansive and compressible. C ?PROJECTS'%10- 202'RPT PRELIM INA RY GEOTECK DOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 12 Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 Therefore, we recommend the removal of surficial soils to the depth of competent Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 General We conclude that the proposed construction at the site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, if the recommendations in this report are incorporated into the design of the project. 5.2 Grading and Earthwork Upon commencement of construction, we should continuously observe grading and earthwork operations for this project. Such observations are essential to identify field conditions that differ from those predicted by this investigation, to adjust designs to actual field conditions, and to determine that the grading is in overall accordance with the recommendations of this report. Our personnel should perform adequate observation and sufficient testing of fills during grading to support the Geotechnical Consultant's professional opinion regarding compliance with compaction requirements and specifications contained herein. 5.3 Site Preparation Before any grading occurs, the site should be cleared of existing debris and other deleterious materials. In areas to receive structures or distress - sensitive improvements, surficial eroded, desiccated, burrowed, or otherwise loose or disturbed soils should be removed to the depth of the C' PROJECTS \I0- 2472�RPT_PRELIM[NARY GEOTECHDOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Page I3 Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 competent Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. Removal depths of one to two fbg are expected. To prevent transitional bearing conditions (a change from cut native to fill soils under the building) it may be necessary to perform overexcavation to create a uniform 3 -foot thick fill cap on some lots. Overexcavations to create this fill cap should extend a minimum of five feet laterally beyond proposed improvement limits. Organic materials not suitable for structural backfill should be disposed of off -site or placed in non - structural planter or landscape areas. All organic materials excavated and removed should be disposed of at a legal disposal site. 5.4 Site Excavation Based on our observations, shallow excavations in site materials will generally be feasible with light construction equipment under normal conditions. Irreducible materials greater than six inches in maximum diameter should generally not be encountered during excavations and if encountered, should not be used in shallow fills on the site. We should be called upon to evaluate the subgrade to verify that mitigative measures (removal of inadequate soils and treatment of transitional conditions) have been properly implemented. As stated, transitional bearing conditions are to be avoided. All structures should be underlain entirely by properly compacted fill or entirely by Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. No footing or slab area should span a cut: fill interface. Again, to avoid transitional conditions it may be necessary to perform overexcavation on some lots. C.'PROJECTS II)- 2972'.RPT PRELINIINARYGEOTECfI.DOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 14 Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 5.5 Fill Placement and Compaction The geotechnical consultant should verify that the proper site preparation has occurred before fill placement occurs. Following removal of loose, disturbed soils areas to receive fills or concrete slabs on grade should be scarified 12 inches, moisture conditioned to above optimum moisture content, and properly compacted. Fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent as evaluated by ASTM D1557 at moisture content between 2 and 4 percent above optimum. The optimum lift thickness for backfill soil will be dependent on the type of compaction equipment used. Generally, backfill should be placed in uniform lifts not exceeding 8- inches in loose thickness. Backfill placement and compaction should be done in overall conformance with geotechnical recommendations and local ordinances. 5.6 Fill Materials Very low to low expansion soils derived from the onsite materials are considered suitable for reuse on the site as compacted fill, provided they are screened of organic materials and materials greater than six inches in maximum dimension. If encountered, clayey native soils may be blended with granular soils and reused in non - structural fill areas. Imported fill beneath structures, pavements and walks should have an expansion index less than or equal to 30 (per UBC Table 18 -I -13) with less than 35 percent passing the no. 200 sieve. C \PROJECTS\10 -2972 \RPT PRELIMINARY GEOTECH.DOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Page IS Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 5.7 Foundations and Slab Recommendations The following recommendations are for preliminary planning purposes only. Based on the anticipated low expansion potential of on -site soils, recommended foundations consist of reinforced footings/slabs -on -grade or post- tension systems. Recommendations provided below are for standard reinforced footings /slabs -on -grade construction. If post - tension foundation systems are selected, additional recommendations will be provided. Foundation recommendations should be reviewed after completion of earthwork and soil testing. 5.7.1 Foundations Continuous and isolated spread footings embedded a minimum of 12 inches into Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics or 18 inches into properly recompacted fill are suitable for use at this site. However, footings should not straddle cut/fill interfaces. Foundation dimensions and reinforcement should be based on allowable bearing values of 2000 pounds per square foot (psf) for footings founded on properly compacted fill. For footings founded directly on the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics an allowable bearing value of 3000 psf should be used to calculate foundation dimensions and reinforcement. The allowable bearing value may be increased by one third for short duration loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces. C:' PROJECTS'J142972`RPT PRELIMINARY GEOTECKDOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 16 Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 Footings should be at least 12 inches wide and 18 inches below the lowest adjacent subgrade. Minimum reinforcement for continuous footings should consist of two #5 reinforcing bars; one placed near the top and one placed near the bottom. Isolated footing reinforcement should be designed by the project structural engineer. The structural engineer should also provide recommendations for reinforcement of any deepened spread footings and footings with pipe penetrations. 5.7.2 Foundation Settlement The potential for foundation settlement should be analyzed once actual foundation loads and final as- graded conditions are known. In general, for the anticipated residential construction, maximum total and differential settlement are expected to be about I inch and 1/2 inch, respectively. 5.7.3 Foundation Setback Footings should be designed such that the minimum horizontal distance from the face of adjacent slopes to the bottom outer edge of the footing is a minimum of 10 feet. 5.7.4 Concrete Slabs Lightly loaded concrete slabs should be a minimum of four inches thick. Minimum slab reinforcement should consist of #3 reinforcing bars placed on 18 -inch centers each way at mid -slab height. In moisture sensitive Floor areas, a vapor barrier of ten -mil visqueen C..IPROIECTS'AO- 2972\RPT- PR ELI MINA RY GEOTECH. DOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Develo Page 17 Olivenhain, California pment September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 overlying a two -inch layer of compacted, clean sand should be installed. A two -inch layer of clean sand should be placed above the visqueen to protect the membrane during concrete placement. 5.8 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures The following recommendations may be used for shallow footings on the site. Foundations placed in firm, well compacted fill material or competent formation may be designed using a coefficient of friction of 0.35 (total frictional resistance equals coefficient of friction times the dead load). A design passive resistance value of 300 pounds per square foot per foot of depth (with a maximum as the sum of the frictional resistance and the passive resistance, provided the passive resistance does not exceed two- thirds of the total allowable resistance. Retaining walls up to ten feet high and backfilled using granular soils may be designed using the equivalent fluid weights given in Table 4 below. TABLE 4 EQUIVALENT FLUID UNIT WEIGHTS (pounds per cubic foot) WALL TYPE LEVEL BACKFILL SLOPE BACKFILL 2:1 (HORIZONTAL: VERTICAL) CANTILEVER WALL (YIELDING) 38 60 RESTRAINED WALL 58 90 C%PROJECTS�10- 2972 \111`T PRELIM INA RY GEOTECH. DOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 18 Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 The above values assume non - expansive backfill and free draining conditions. Measures should be taken to prevent a moisture buildup behind all retaining walls. Drainage measures should include free draining backfill materials and perforated drains. Figure 3 provides recommended gravel and perforated pipe drainage system. These drains should discharge to an appropriate offsite location. 5.9 Exterior Flatwork To reduce the potential for distress to exterior flatwork caused by minor settlement of foundation soils, we recommend that such flatwork be installed with crack - control joints at appropriate spacings as designed by the project architect. Flatwork, which should be installed with crack control joints, includes driveways, sidewalks, and architectural features. All subgrade should be prepared according to the earthwork recommendations previously given before placing concrete. Positive drainage should be established and maintained adjacent to all flatwork with drainage away from improvements at a gradient of at least two percent for a distance of at least five feet. 5.10 Drainage Surface runoff should be collected and directed away from improvements by appropriate erosion reducing devices. Positive drainage should also be established around the proposed improvements. The project civil engineer should thoroughly evaluate the on -site drainage and make provisions necessary to keep surface water from affecting the site. i CAPROJECTS, 104Y7?`.RPT PRELIM INA RV GEOTECKDOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Page 19 Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 5.11 Asphalt Pavements Pavement sections presented below are based on a Resistance "R" Value testing of representative surficial materials collected from nearby properties. The upper one -foot of soils underlying all pavement sections should be appropriately moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the laboratory determined maximum density. The asphalt pavement design is based on Califomia Department of Transportation Highway Manual and on traffic indexes as indicated in Table 5 below. Upon completion of finish grading, we recommend that additional sampling and testing of subgrade soils should occur and the pavement section modified, if necessary. TABLE 5 ASPHALT PAVEMENT Traffic Area Traffic Index Subgrade AC Class It "R" Value Thickness Aggregate Base (inches) Thickness (inches) Local Surface 5.0 43 4.0 Streets 6.0 5.12 Slopes Although existing slopes on this site should be grossly stable, the soils will be somewhat erodible. Therefore, runoff water should not be permitted to drain over the edges of slopes unless that water is confined to properly designed and constructed drainage facilities. Erosion resistant vegetation should be maintained on the face of all slopes. Typically, soils along the top portion of a fill slope face will tend to creep laterally. Therefore, we do not recommend distress sensitive hardscape improvements be constructed within five feet of slope crests in till areas. C` PROIECiSUU- 2972`RPT_PRELIMINARY GEOTECHDOC Preliminary Geotechnical investigation Page 20 Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Olivenhain, Califomia September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 Proposed fill and cut slopes should be constructed at gradients of 2:1 (horizontal: vertical) or flatter. All slopes should be evaluated by CTE to verify that conditions are as anticipated 5.13 Construction Observation The recommendations provided in this report are based on preliminary design information for the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions found in the exploratory locations. The interpolated subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during construction to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Recommendations provided in this report are based on the understanding and assumption that CTE will provide the observation and testing services for the project. All earthworks should be observed and tested to verify that grading activity has been performed according to the recommendations contained within this report. All footing trenches should be evaluated by the project engineer before reinforcing steel placement. 5.14 Plan Review CTE should review the project foundation plans and grading plans before commencement of earthwork to identify potential conflicts with the recommendations contained in this report. C:` PROJ ECTS%10- 29721RPT_PR ELI MINA R Y GEOTEC H. DOC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development Page 21 Olivenhain, California September 16, 1998 CTE Job No. 10 -2972 6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION The field evaluation, laboratory testing and geotechnical analysis presented in this report have been conducted according to current engineering practice and the standard of care exercised by reputable geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the conclusions, recommendations and opinions expressed in this report. Variations may exist and conditions not observed or described in this report may be encountered during construction. Our conclusions and recommendations are based on an analysis of the observed conditions. If conditions different from those described in this report are encountered, our office should be notified and additional recommendations, if required, will be provided upon request. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. Rodney D. Ballard, GE #2173 Geotechnical Engineering M sgGC;.;�� ¢fa tio.2�7: A J nathan Goodmacher. RG #6143 P 'ect Geologist 1 CPROJECTSN0- 2972�111`T PRELIM INA RY GEOTECH. DOC l- CARLSBAD a jJ4 I 1� sRCQS - -.� �.... IL SITEa e3 I z 4, y i i fG CiG ;,J YYili -1 Y`i .i'4!} 1 p� BF ;RANCH(} "a41TA: E 11 1;4 14 I MILES U 1 320 2(Ao 52gOFEET SOURCE THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS 19% SAN DIEGO EDITION �J:, ll .. fr{ 1 Cllr : I N.I TAS- .1 Iss rM 11 1;4 14 I MILES U 1 320 2(Ao 52gOFEET SOURCE THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS 19% SAN DIEGO EDITION �J:, LEGEND TP- I ® APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION ST -I APPROXIMATE SEISMIC' 1-i TRAVERSE LOCATION - - ' PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPOSED BUILDING DOVE HOLLOW ROAD E 1 ST -2 E I ST -} ST-1 E TP -5 P TP 7 E I ® E E STA I E I I E I I I 1 7 P -2 1 I P�OPO E OCOgO TP -6 1 E TP -9 9 I ® I E ST -5 TP -I 5 i ® T ®D / E FORTUNA RANCH ROAD 1 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP 10 -2972 GEOTECHNICAL ANDCONSTRUCEION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION RANCHO FORTUNA " ' 2-414 VINEYARD AVENUE, STF G Z0. ESCONIRDOCA. 99p6%T49.4955 FORTUNA RANCH ROAD NO SCALE r�11NYp1w 12f ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 5" E 8/98 IPIGURE 2 RETAINING WALL, I e 4�v 0 0400 0 o e s04 � • a - a ► pv i °0 0 i e o 0 ' O � e � . a FINISH GRADE ao •�O ° ► v W WALL BACKFILL COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY 3/4" GRAVEL SURROUNDED BY FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 140 N, OR EQUIVALENT) mu It, 4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR EQUIVALENT). MINIMUM I% GRADIENT TO SUITABLE OUTLET WALL FOOTING -11. /N MIMMUM 6" LAYER OF FILTER ROCK UNDERLYING PIPE APPENDIX A REFERENCES CITED REFERENCES CITED California Division of Mines and Geology Website, January 15, 1997, California Fault Parameters. 2. Greensfelder, R., 1974, "Maximum Credible Rock Acceleration from Earthquakes in California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 23, 3. Hart, Earl W., Revised 1994, "Fault- Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist Priolo, Special Studies Zones Act of 1972," California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42. 4. Jennings, Charles W., revised 1987, "Fault Map of California with Locations of Volcanoes, Thermal Springs and Thermal Wells." 5. Ploessel, M.R. and Slosson, J.E., 1974, "Repeatable High Ground Accelerations from Earthquakes - Important Design Criteria," California Geology, p. 195 -199. 6. Tan, S.S. and Giffen, D.G., 1995, "Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, San Diego County California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Landslide Hazard Identification Map No. 35. 7. Tan, S.S. and Kennedy, M.P., 1996, "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern part of the San Diego County California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report No. 96 -02. APPENDIX B EXPLORATION LOGS rri VI�r�Nr�IM r�u� M I ... ..... NIY...VI...I..' , UIVJ11C Ut.t AND IV IJJJUNE G OL J. IVUI INLGl.tltlVI JIVL. 4FU1l CMNlI'A! ANU CUN)I PI�I'IIUN ENGINE EPING TEEIINC AND INSPEf PION J 1114 VIHl1'.VD AV ENUf. )b1EG f)t'UNDIDU CA Y!ufY,ibYl 74U -41S1 EN nraluPO; W PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT C'TE IOB NO: 10 -2472 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 3108 TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 111 "N LOGGED BY: V.BILBO ELEVATION: cI - ` L L 4 8 TEST PIT RECORD: TP -I DESCRIPTION ML 01 Q TOPSOIL: Loose, dry, light to medium brown, sandy SILT, with organics (roots, rootlets) with occasional cobble to small boulder size volcanics at depth. 0 clayey volcanics, excavates as sandy SILT, vesicular, ruffaceous texture, iron oxide strong along fractures, areas of mottled, very weathered, very iron stained material with increased red brown clay. © Dense, as above, slightly vesicular with mafic inclusions, iron oxide strong along fractures. Density increases with depth. Fracture pattern trending northwest, dipping approximately 60°west. Taal depth = 3' Difficult to excavate at 3' No groundwater encountered Laboratory I c,t, Y_S�iVI. V IV J I1 I% O k 1 I V IV I L3 1 1 NU LX L IN U I IN L L 1\ 1 IN U, 1 IN I. [` LEUtkI HNN Al . INII I ON5rNUl r'UN EN6INEERING TESTING ANII INSYtI rIUN P IN TA NU AVENUE SOIIL U ESC OND IOU CA V11314 i7jn� 74&.4 o15 L,.-'IM ➢MG IW PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CTE JOB NO. 102972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE JIOB TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE. 7 27,98 LOGGED BY. V.BILBO ELEVATION. G L � = = TEST PIT RECORD: TP -2 L y f v X x ML TOPSOIL: loose, dry, light to medium brown, sandy SILT with organics and cobble size volcanics. © JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, dry, light tan with light gray and brown, volcanics, very weathered, excavates as fine sandy SILT to SILT. Iron oxide locally very strong along fractures and in pockets, very minor organics. Density increases with depth. © Very dense, dry, medium gray, volcanics, iron oxide throughout and locally very strong. Steeply dipping fractures trending approximately N35W. Total depth = 3' Refusal to further excavation at 3' No groundwater encountered Laboratory Tests ML QI TOPSOIL: loose, dry, light to medium brown, sandy SILT with organics (roots, grass, rootlets), occasional coarse gravel to cobble size volcanics. © JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, dark orange brown with light Ian and greenish tan, volcanics, very weathered, excavates as sandy SILT, iron stain throughout and locally very strong in pockets and fractures. © Medium dense to dense, mottled, volcanics, with slightly tuffaceous texture, iron stain locally very strong, mostly along fractures, density increases with depth. Fractures trending approximately S70E, dipping approximately 60 "N. Total depth = 27" Refusal to further excavation at 2'2" No groundwater encountered � UFU IFCNNIC AL AND CUNSINUC IION ENGINEERING fE SIINU AND INSPECTION V II VIN[IANU AVE HUE SUITE ESCONUIUO CAr +))bnl )u. 4v43 E1.ANLitIMiIV' PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CfE JOB NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 310B TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7.27,98 LOGGEDBY: V.BILBO ELEVATION — - € Y s TEST PIT RECORD: TP -3 Laboratory Tests X ] r C G L DESCRIPTION ML QI TOPSOIL: loose, dry, light to medium brown, sandy SILT with organics (roots, grass, rootlets), occasional coarse gravel to cobble size volcanics. © JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, dark orange brown with light Ian and greenish tan, volcanics, very weathered, excavates as sandy SILT, iron stain throughout and locally very strong in pockets and fractures. © Medium dense to dense, mottled, volcanics, with slightly tuffaceous texture, iron stain locally very strong, mostly along fractures, density increases with depth. Fractures trending approximately S70E, dipping approximately 60 "N. Total depth = 27" Refusal to further excavation at 2'2" No groundwater encountered �+ ♦. v UEUIECIINICAk AND l'uNSINNI IIUN EN41NEEPINU LESIINU AND `I N5YkCt1UN ` .' 24 11 VINl1 AND\VI NUk SUIIk G ESCUNDIDO CA V!n!v 114,1114.4111 p..:pQrypy ry' PROJECT: RANCHOFORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CTEJOBNO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE)IOBTURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7'27.98 LOGGED BY: VBILBO ELEVATION: — E UV u E TEST PIT RECORD: TP -5 Laboratory Tests V 1 C — L DESCRIPTION 0 NIL 2 NIL 5 Q TOPSOIL: Loose, dry, light to medium brown, sandy SILT with organics. © JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, dry, light brown to tan with orange brown, excavates as sandy SILT, occasional organics. Residual Soil. © Medium dense to dense, dry to moist, dark orange to red brown with light grayish tan, weathered volcanics, breccia texture, excavates as clayey sandy SILT, trace clay. Abundant iron staining throughout and strong locally, occasional organic material, increased density and decreased weathering with depth. Total depth = 2.5' Difficult to excavate at 2.5' No groundwater encountered. SCsM Q TOPSOIL: Loose, dry, reddish brown, clayey silty SAND with organics (weeds, rootlets). I © JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Very dense, dry, olive to reddish brown, clayey silty fine SAND, abundant iron staining, fractured. I Total depth = 3.5' Difficult to excavate at 3.5' No groundwater encountered I .. V IN a I AL", I I V IN I L a I I IN U E.0 LIN U I A IIYU, 1"\ . IN"" I GkUTECNNICAI AND ONSTRUCIION ENGINkERING Ik STING AND INSPk( IIUN LV iI.1 NIA VINEYARD Av ENVk. SUITE G ESC ON pIpO CA + III—P r1L.(a 55 F.v.NflRTN:IV' PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CTE JOB NO 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 3108 TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE. 7 27 96 LOGGED BY S. DIEM ELEVATION. c � � = = TEST PIT RECORD: TP -6 Laboratory Tests y XL L DESCRIPTION SCsM Q TOPSOIL: Loose, dry, reddish brown, clayey silty SAND with organics (weeds, rootlets). I © JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Very dense, dry, olive to reddish brown, clayey silty fine SAND, abundant iron staining, fractured. I Total depth = 3.5' Difficult to excavate at 3.5' No groundwater encountered I U1Vk IIt IN1.tIDIV 1CCllIVN OC Gc rEIINLL1 \1IVU, V+ Lk UIEf11NIl AL AND I'uN51 N14IlUN ENGIHEENING FF511N4 LHO IHfYE)IIOH :III VINLI AM0 AVINVF fill IE U ESIUN DID I 42.,IV 17bn1 )14 -4 o I I 6 4.:0.ilWGIV' PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CFE 10B NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 3100 TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE. 7 27 98 LOGGED BV. V.BILBO ELEVATION: <, E . TEST PIT RECORD: TP -7 Laboratory Tests _ f C' r X 3 _ DESCRIPTION SC -SM 5 Q TOPSOIL: Loose, dry to moist, medium brown, clayey sandy SILT to silly SAND will] organics (roots, rootlets) with occasional cobble size volcanics. © JURASSIC SAN "FIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense to dense, dry to moist, dark orange to red brown with light tan, excavates as clayey silty SAND. Abundant iron staining throughout, very weathered. © Dense to very dense, dry to moist, dark orange brown and medium greenish gray, volcanics, fine plagioclase phenocrysts, abundant iron oxide on fractures, clay on fractures, areas of less competent material, steep fractures trending approximately N I OW. Total depth = 6'3" Difficult to excavate at 6'3" No groundwater encountered HUIUREJ UFUTE C $ I. (! 1 1 ENGINEERING E � ❑NI('Al AND CVFINUC TIU II T itING AND IN YNIC ZION a 2414 VINE I AND AVENUE )UItEG ESCONDIDO('A VIn`q ,)bo, 7V1 .1v35 4:JMiRPf.I`Y IECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT JOB NO 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 3108 TURBO BACKHOE GED BY: V. BILBO C L G TEST PIT RECORD: TP -8 J U — L � I-M I I 01 70 ED TOPSOIL: Loose to medium dense, dry to moist, medium to dark brown, silty sandy CLAY to clayey SAND with abundant organic material (roots, weeds, rootlets). EXCAVATION DATE. 7,27,98 ELEVATION © JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense to dense, dry to moist, greenish gray t% orange brown, excavates as sandy CLAY. Areas of more competent angular volcanic Iragtttents to 1;2", iron oxide throughout and locally strong, occasional organics. Very weathered. © Dense to very dense, dry to moist, medium greenish gray, volcanics, abundant iron oxide, very strong on fracture surface, manganese stain, areas of more weathered material, occasional organics and trace clay on fractures. Total depth = 8.5' Difficult to excavate at 8.5' No groundwater encountered E Laboratory Tests i vlv� t ttUU I A AND 1 J a 111vu a 1:rVUttvJ Llctnu, 11-4 L. � 4f VLk C11 NICAL eNU CVNlIMIIL IIUN 1N41Nkl NIxU (E )LINO AND IN )PICIIUN :111 VINk IAX11 AVENUE SIM I,4 ESI UNUIUO( A'I:u! v 01-1 flu-, Iff PROJECT RANCHOFORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CTE JOB NO. I I0-2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 31 nB TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7 27 9x DOGGED BY: V.B1LB0 ELEVATION. L E L = E ` TEST PIT RECORD: TP -9 j t L C DESCRIPTION 0 FU Q TOPSOIL: Loose, dry to moist, medium brown, clayey sandy SILT to silty SAND with organics (roots, rootlets), occasional cobble size volcanics- JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense to dense, dry, medium brown with ora brown, excavates as clayey SAND, very weathered with angular volcanic fragments. © Medium dense to dense, dry, mottled, greenish gray with orange brown, very weathered volcanics, argillic alteration, excavates as clayey silty medium to coarse SAND. Density increases with depth, abundant iron oxide, strong in pockets and on fractures. ® Dense to very dense, dry, strong, greenish gray, volcanics, with abundant iron oxide, less weathered than above, blocky, sandy areas, gray clay on fractures. Total depth = 8.5' Refusal to liErther excavation at 8.5' No groundwater encountered tge Laboratory Tests VINa IIV UI IIVIN ILJI IIYU M LIYV IIY I: I. I \1::' =, II'1. GkIMI nNII%I AND 1ON$ I R VC I ION ENGINEER ING I ESI ING ANTI IN 1!' :IVN N La WINE I A RD AV IN Uk SIIII E G ESCONOIDO CA +:t+ 174- . 746 I.q E fJNRYAL IM' PROJECT: RANCHOFORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CTE JOB NO: 102972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 310B TURBO BACKHDE EXCAVATION DATE. 7 27 vs LOGGEDBY: V.BILBO ELEVATION: TEST PIT RECORD: TP- I Oa (South Wall) Laboratory Tests s DESCRIPTION 0 ( Ell CL -ML SC -SM i EE 0 TOPSOIL: Medium dense, dry to moist, medium to dark reddish brown, clayey silly SAND to sandy CLAY with organics (roots, rootlets), occasional weathered volcanic fragments at depth, increased clay at depth. © Increased density, increased clay from above. M JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, moist, light greenish gray, excavates as clayey silty fine SAND with gravel to cobble size volcanic fragments. Very weathered. Q Dense to very dense, dry to moist, dark orange brown with red brown and greenish gray, volcanics, abundant iron oxide mostly on fractures, clay on fractures. Total depth = 7.5' Difficult to excavate at 7.5' No groundwater encountered - :, V1VJ 11 \U4I LV1\ ILJ I IIYV µ LNVII. 1IYA.. S GEUTECNNICAL AND Cu NSIRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION ;III VINEYARD AVENIIk. SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA • vLINuI TIk -IYSS E,6MAIII PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT E JOB NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 3108 TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7:'S LOGGED BY: V.BILBO ELEVATION: { TEST PIT RECORD: TP -IOb (North Wall) Laboratory Iesi, V l V S i L 0 CL -ML OI 0 SC 0 TOPSOIL: Medium dense, dry to moist, medium to dark reddish brown, clayey silty SAND to sandy CLAY with organics (roots, rootlets), occasional weathered volcanic fragments at depth, increased clay at depth. Q Increased density, increased red brown clay. © JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, moist, greenish gray, excavates as clayey SAND with volcanic fragments, areas of sandy material, minor iron oxide throughout. Dense to very dense, dry to moist, dark orange brown with red brown and greenish gray, volcanics, abundant iron oxide, mostly on fractures, clay on fractures. Total depth = 7.5' Difficult to excavate at 7.5' No groundwater encountered 777 T APPENDIX C STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Appendix C Specifications for Grading APPENDIX C STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING PROJECTS Section I -General C -1 The guidelines contained herein and the standard details attached hereto represent Construction Testing & Engineering's standard recommendations for grading and other associated operations on construction projects. These guidelines should be considered a portion of the project specifications. Recommendations contained in the body of the previously presented soils report shall supersede the recommendations and or requirements as specified herein. Disputes arising out of interpretation of the recommendations contained in the soils report or specifications contained herein shall be interpreted by the project geotechnical consultant. Section 2 - Responsibilities of Project Personnel The geotechnical consultant should provide observation and testing services sufficient to assure that geotechnical construction is performed in general conformance with project specifications and standard grading practices. The geotechnical consultant should report any deviations to the client or his authorized representative. The Client should be chiefly responsible for all aspects of the project. He or his authorized representative has the responsibility of reviewing the findings and recommendations of the geotechnical consultant. He shall authorize or cause to have authorized the Contractor and/or other consultants to perform work and/or provide services. During grading the Client or his authorized representative should remain on -site or should remain reasonably accessible to all concerned parties in order to make decisions necessary to maintain the flow of the project. The Contractor should be responsible for the safety of the project and satisfactory completion of all grading and other associated operations on construction projects, including, but not limited to, earth work in accordance with the project plans, specifications and controlling agency requirements. Section 3 - Preconstruction Meeting A preconstruction site meeting shall be arranged by the owner and/or client and shall include the grading contractor, the design engineer, the geotechnical consultant, owner's representative and representatives of the appropriate governing authorities. Section 4 - Site Preparation The client or contractor should obtain the required approvals from the controlling authorities for the project prior, during and /or after demolition, site preparation and removals, etc. The appropriate approvals should be obtained prior to proceeding with grading operations. Appendix C Specifications for Grading C -2 Clearing and grubbing should consist of the removal of vegetation such as brush, grass, woods, stumps, trees, root of trees and otherwise deleterious natural materials from the areas to be graded. Clearing and grubbing should extend to the outside of all proposed excavation and till areas. Demolition should include removal of buildings, structures, foundations, reservoirs, utilities (including underground pipelines, septic tanks, leach fields, seepage pits, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, etc.) and other man-made surface and subsurface improvements from the areas to be graded. Demolition of utilities should include proper capping and/or rerouting pipelines at the project perimeter and cutoff and capping of wells in accordance with the requirements of the governing authorities and the recommendations of the geotechnical consultant at the time of demolition. Trees, plants or man -made improvements not planned to be removed or demolished should be protected by the contractor from damage or injury. Debris generated during clearing, grubbing and/or demolition operations should be wasted from areas to be graded and disposed off -site. Clearing, grubbing and demolition operations should be performed under the observation of the geotechnical consultant. Section 5 - Site Protection Protection of the site during the period of grading should be the responsibility of the contractor. Unless other provisions are made in writing and agreed upon among the concerned parties, completion of a portion of the project should not be considered to preclude that portion or adjacent areas from the requirements for site protection until such time as the entire project is complete as identified by the geotechnical consultant, the client and the regulating agencies. Precautions should be taken during the performance of site clearing, excavations and grading to protect the work site from flooding, ponding or inundation by poor or improper surface drainage. Temporary provisions should be made during the rainy season to adequately direct surface drainage away from and off the work site. Where low areas cannot be avoided, pumps should be kept on hand to continually remove water during periods of rainfall. Rain related damage should be considered to include, but may not be limited to, erosion, silting, saturation, swelling, structural distress and other adverse conditions as determined by the geotechnical consultant. Soil adversely affected should be classified as unsuitable materials and should be subject to overexcavation and replacement with compacted till or other remedial grading as recommended by the geotechnical consultant. The contractor should be responsible for the stability of all temporary excavations. Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant pertaining to temporary excavations (e.g., backcuts) are made in consideration of stability of the completed project and, therefore, should not be considered to preclude the responsibilities of the contractor. Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant should not be considered to preclude more restrictive requirements by the regulating agencies. The contractor should provide during periods of extensive rainfall plastic Appendix C Specifications for Grading C -3 sheeting to prevent unprotected slopes from becoming saturated and unstable. When deemed appropriate by the geotechnical consultant or governing agencies the contractor shall install checkdams, desilting basins, sand bags or other drainage control measures. In relatively level areas and/or slope areas, where saturated soil and/or erosion gullies exist to depths of greater than 1.0 foot, they should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill in accordance with the applicable specifications. Where affected materials exist to depths of 1.0 foot or less below proposed finished grade, remedial grading by moisture conditioning in- place, followed by thorough recompaction in accordance with the applicable grading guidelines herein may be attempted. If the desired results are not achieved, all affected materials should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill in accordance with the slope repair recommendations herein. If field conditions dictate, other slope repair procedures may be recommended by the geotechnical consultant. Section 6 - Excavations 6.1 Unsuitable Materials Materials that are unsuitable should be excavated under observation and recommendations of the geotechnical consultant. Unsuitable materials include, but may not be limited to, dry, loose, soft, wet, organic compressible natural soils and fractured, weathered, soft bedrock and nonengineered or otherwise deleterious fill materials. Material identified by the geotechnical consultant as unsatisfactory due to its moisture conditions should be overexcavated, moisture conditioned as needed, to a uniform at or above optimum moisture condition before placement as compacted fill. If during the course of grading adverse geotechnical conditions are exposed which were not anticipated in the preliminary soil report as determined by the geotechnical consultant additional exploration, analyzation and treatment of these problems may be recommended. 6.2 Cut Slopes Unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant and approved by the regulating agencies, permanent cut slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 (horizontal: vertical). The geotechnical consultant should observe cut slope excavation and if these excavations expose loose cohesionless, significantly fractured or otherwise unsuitable material, the materials should be overexcavated and replaced with a compacted stabilization fill. If encountered specific cross section details should be obtained from the Geotechnical Consultant. Appendix C Specifications for Grading C -4 When extensive cut slopes are excavated or these cut slopes are made in the direction of the prevailing drainage, a non - erodible diversion swale (brow ditch) should be provided at the top of the slope. 6.3 Pad Areas All lot pad areas, including side yard terrace containing both cut and fill materials, transitions, located less than 3 feet deep should be overexcavated to a depth of 3 feet and replaced with a uniform compacted fill blanket of 3 feet. Actual depth of overexcavation may vary and should be delineated by the geotechnical consultant during grading. For pad areas created above cut or natural slopes, positive drainage should be established away from the top -of- slope. This maybe accomplished utilizing a berm drainage Swale and/or an appropriate pad gradient. A gradient in soil areas away from the top-of slopes of 2 percent or greater is recommended. Section 7 - Compacted Fill All fill materials should have fill quality, placement, conditioning and compaction as specified below or as approved by the geotechnical consultant. 7.1 Fill Material Quality Excavated on -site or import materials which are acceptable to the geotechnical consultant may be utilized as compacted fill, provided trash, vegetation and other deleterious materials are removed prior to placement. All import materials anticipated for use on -site should be sampled tested and approved prior to and placement is in conformance with the requirements outlined. Rocks 12 inches in maximum and smaller may be utilized within compacted fill provided sufficient fill material is placed and thoroughly compacted over and around all rock to effectively fill rock voids. The amount of rock should not exceed 40 percent by dry weight passing the 3/4 -inch sieve. The geotechnical consultant may vary those requirements as field conditions dictate. Where rocks greater than 12 inches but less than four feet of maximum dimension are generated during grading, or otherwise desired to be placed within an engineered fill, special handling in accordance with attached Plates and described below. Rocks greater than four feet should be broken down or disposed off -site. 7.2 Placement of Fill .e Appendix C Specifications for Grading C -5 Prior to placement of fill material the geotechnical consultant should inspect the area to receive till. After inspection and approval the exposed ground surface should be scarified to a depth of 6 to 3 inches. The scarified material should be conditioned (i.e. moisture added or air dried by continued discing) to achieve a moisture content at or slightly above optimum moisture conditions and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum density or as otherwise recommended in the soils report or by appropriate government agencies. Compacted fill should then be placed in thin horizontal lifts not exceeding eight inches in loose thickness prior to compaction. Each lift should be moisture conditioned as needed, thoroughly blended to achieve a consistent moisture content at or slightly above optimum and thoroughly compacted by mechanical methods to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum dry density. Each lift should be treated in a like manner until the desired finished grades are achieved. The contractor should have suitable and sufficient mechanical compaction equipment and watering apparatus on the job site to handle the amount of fill being placed in consideration of moisture retention properties of the materials and weather conditions. When placing fill in horizontal lifts adjacent to areas sloping steeper than 5:1 (horizontal: vertical), horizontal keys and vertical benches should be excavated into the adjacent slope area. Keying and benching should be sufficient to provide at least six -foot wide benches and a minimum of four feet of vertical bench height within the firm natural ground, firm bedrock or engineered compacted fill. No compacted fill should be placed in an area after keying and benching until the area has been reviewed by the geotechnical consultant. Material generated by the benching operation should be moved sufficiently away from the bench area to allow for the recommended review of the horizontal bench prior to placement of fill. Within a single fill area where grading procedures dictate two or more separate fills, temporary slopes (false slopes) may be created. When placing fill adjacent to a false slope, benching should be conducted in the same manner as above described. At least a 3 -foot vertical bench should be established within the firm core of adjacent approved compacted fill prior to placement of additional fill. Benching should proceed in at least afoot vertical increments until the desired finished grades are achieved. Prior to placement of additional compacted fill following an overnight or other grading delay, the exposed surface or previously compacted fill should be processed by scarification, moisture conditioning as needed to at or slightly above optimum moisture content, thoroughly blended and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum dry density. Where unsuitable materials exist to depths of greater than one foot, the unsuitable materials should be overexcavated. Appendix C Specifications for Grading C -6 Following a period of flooding, rainfall or overwatering by other means, no additional fill should be placed until damage assessments have been made and remedial grading perfonned as described herein. Rocks 12 inch in maximum dimension and smaller may be utilized in the compacted fill provided the fill is placed and thoroughly compacted over and around all rock. No oversize material should be used within 3 feet of finished pad grade and within I foot of other compacted fill areas. Rocks 12 inches up to four feet maximum dimension should be placed below the upper 5 feet of any fill and should not be closer than I I feet to any slope face. These recommendations could vary as locations of improvements dictate. Where practical, oversized material should not be placed below areas where structures or deep utilities are proposed. Oversized material should be placed in windrows on a clean, overexcavated or unyielding compacted fill or firm natural ground surface. Select native or imported granular soil (S.E. 30 or higher) should be placed and thoroughly flooded over and around all windrowed rock, such that voids are filled. Windrows of oversized material should be staggered so those successive strata of oversized material are not in the same vertical plane. It may be possible to dispose of individual larger rock as field conditions dictate and as recommended by the geotechnical consultant at the time of placement. The contractor should assist the geotechnical consultant and/or his representative by digging test pits for removal determinations and/or for testing compacted fill. The contractor should provide this work at no additional cost to the owner or contractor's client. Fill should be tested by the geotechnical consultant for compliance with the recommended relative compaction and moisture conditions. Field density testing should conform to ASTM Method of Test D 1556 -82, D 2922 -81. Tests should be conducted at a minimum of two vertical feet or 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. Actual test intervals may vary as field conditions dictate. Fill found not to be in conformance with the grading recommendations should be removed or otherwise handled as recommended by the geotechnical consultant. 7.3 Fill Slopes Unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant and approved by the regulating agencies, permanent fill slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 (horizontal: vertical). Except as specifically recommended in these grading guidelines compacted fill slopes should be over -built and cut back to grade, exposing the firm, compacted fill inner core. The actual amount of overbuilding may vary as field conditions dictate. If the desired results are not achieved, the existing slopes should be overexcavated and reconstructed under the guidelines of the geotechnical consultant. The degree of overbuilding shall be increased until the r - r Appendix C Specifications for Grading C -7 desired compacted slope surface condition is achieved. Care should be taken by the contractor to provide thorough mechanical compaction to the outer edge of the overbuilt slope surface. At the discretion of the geotechnical consultant, slope face compaction may be attempted by conventional construction procedures including backrolling. The procedure must create a firmly compacted material throughout the entire depth of the slope face to the surface of the previously compacted firm fill intercore. During grading operations care should be taken to extend compactive effort to the outer edge of the slope. Each lift should extend horizontally to the desired finished slope surface or more as needed to ultimately established desired grades. Grade during construction should not be allowed to roll off at the edge of the slope. It may be helpful to elevate slightly the outer edge of the slope. Slough resulting from the placement of individual lifts should not be allowed to drift down over previous lifts. At intervals not exceeding four feet in vertical slope height or the capability of available equipment, whichever is less, fill slopes should be thoroughly dozer trackrolled. For pad areas above fill slopes, positive drainage should be established away from the top -of- slope. This may be accomplished using a berm and pad gradient of at least 2 percent. Section 8 - Trench Backfill Utility and/or other excavation of trench backfill should, unless otherwise recommended, be compacted by mechanical means. Unless otherwise recommended, the degree of compaction should be a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density. Within slab areas, but outside the influence of foundations, trenches up to one foot wide and two feet deep maybe backfilled with sand and consolidated by jetting, flooding or by mechanical means. If on -site materials are utilized, they should be wheel - rolled, tamped or otherwise compacted to a firm condition. For minor interior trenches, density testing may be deleted or spot testing may be elected if deemed necessary, based on review of backfill operations during construction. It utility contractors indicate that it is undesirable to use compaction equipment in close proximity to a buried conduit, the contractor may elect the utilization of light weight mechanical compaction equipment and/or shading of the conduit with clean, granular material, which should be thoroughly jetted in -place above the conduit, prior to initiating mechanical compaction procedures. Other methods of utility trench compaction may also be appropriate, upon review of the geotechnical consultant at the time of construction. In cases where clean granular materials are proposed for use in lieu of native materials or where flooding or jetting is proposed, the procedures should be considered subject to review by the geotechnical consultant. Appendix C Specifications for Grading Clean granular backfill and/or bedding are not recommended in slope areas. Section 9 - Drainage C -8 Where deemed appropriate by the geotechnical consultant, canyon subdrain systems should be installed in accordance. Typical subdrains for compacted fill buttresses, slope stabilization or sidehill masses, should be installed in accordance with the specifications of the accompanying attached plates. Roof, pad and slope drainage should be directed away from slopes and areas of structures to suitable disposal areas via non - erodible devices (i.e., gutters, downspouts, and concrete swales) as shown in the attached plates. For drainage in extensively landscaped areas near structures, (i.e., within four feet) a minimum of 5 percent gradient away from the structure should be maintained. Pad drainage of at least 2 percent should be maintained over the remainder of the site. Drainage patterns established at the time of fine grading should be maintained throughout the life of the project. Property owners should be made aware that altering drainage patterns could be detrimental to slope stability and foundation performance. Section 10 -Slope Maintenance 10.1 - Landscape Plants In order to enhance surficial slope stability, slope planting should be accomplished at the completion of grading. Slope planting should consist of deep- rooting vegetation requiring little watering. Plants native to the southern California area and plants relative to native plants are generally desirable. Plants native to other semi -arid and and areas may also be appropriate. A Landscape Architect should be the best party to consult regarding actual types of plants and planting configuration. 10.2 - Irrigation Irrigation pipes should be anchored to slope faces, not placed in trenches excavated into slope faces. Appendix C Specifications for Grading C -9 Slope irrigation should be minimized. If automatic timing devices are utilized on irrigation systems, provisions should be made for interrupting normal irrigation during periods of rainfall. 10.3 - Repair As a precautionary measure, plastic sheeting should be readily available, or kept on hand, to protect all slope areas from saturation by periods of heavy or prolonged rainfall. This measure is strongly recommended, beginning with the period of time prior to landscape planting. If slope failures occur, the geotechnical consultant should be contacted for a field review of site conditions and development of recommendations for evaluation and repair. If slope failures occur as a result of exposure to period of heavy rainfall, the failure areas and currently unaffected areas should be covered with plastic sheeting to protect against additional saturation. In the accompanying Standard Details, appropriate repair procedures are illustrated for superficial slope failures (i.e., occurring typically within the outer one foot to three feet of a slope face). f� -r Appendix C Specifications for Grading C -9 Slope irrigation should be minimized. If automatic timing devices are utilized on irrigation systems, provisions should be made for interrupting normal irrigation during periods of rainfall. 10.3 - Repair As a precautionary measure, plastic sheeting should be readily available, or kept on hand, to protect all slope areas from saturation by periods of heavy or prolonged rainfall. This measure is strongly recommended, beginning with the period of time prior to landscape planting. If slope failures occur, the geotechnical consultant should be contacted for a field review of site conditions and development of recommendations for evaluation and repair. If slope failures occur as a result of exposure to period of heavy rainfall, the failure areas and currently unaffected areas should be covered with plastic sheeting to protect against additional saturation. In the accompanying Standard Details, appropriate repair procedures are illustrated for superficial slope failures (i.e., occurring typically within the outer one foot to three feet of a slope face). a CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Services Department - 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, Ca. 92024 -3633 Phone (760) 633 -2770 Fax (760) 633 -2818 TRANSMITTAL LETTER To: Laret Eng Attn: Stu Phone: 858 - 756 -9374 Owner: Staver Site Address: Rancho Summit Dr APN: 264 - 033 -10 & -11 Date: 08/22/07 From: Stephanie Kellar C,,�-4-A; � PLA*,) Lp2 -77 --69 Subdivision Engineering Phone: (760) 633 -2839 Drawing #: 6242 -G, 6857 -G, 327 -CS Planning Case #: 98 -272 Plancheck #: cc chk 4 Engineering Comments: Please make changes to the swale/ driveway crossings or contact me to discuss. Resubmittal to include a proposal & receipt from SDGE for undergrounding within the property. Sorry- just don't have space to keep on hold in my office. Water Comments: n/a Planning and Building Comments: n/a Parks and Recreation Comments: n/a Fire Comments: n/a Public Works Comments: n/a Please Return: this box + 2 copies of the receipt from SDGE for undergrounding impv. to Eng, File Copies To: File Via: Messenger D Mail O Fax O Other O Received By: n +a f _ Date: 8- 23 —o Title: Location: Ph: EN CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Services Department - 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, Ca. 92024 -3633 Phone (760) 633 -2770 Fax (760) 633 -2818 TRANSMITTAL LETTER To: Laret Eng Attn: Stu Eyler Phone: 858 - 756 -9374 Owner: Staver Site Address: Rancho Summit Dr APN: 264 - 033 -10 & -11 Date: 09/18/07 From: Stephanie Kellar Subdivision Engineering Phone: (760) 633 -2839 Drawing #: 6242 -G, 6857 -G, 327 -CS Planning Case #: 98 -272 Plancheck #: covenants Engineering Comments: Covenants returned with minor comments. Please make corrections, execute, notarize, and return to me with the proper recording fee. /itSa - No7A211 Ate- PvRPCTF ACatiow� &734E'7uE9U7 -S /W64W 0AUNrrT BE SPC ,r dF7wE,t_,0,j Z PRGES - mus-r AW, A PPLAR, cw oAfE P^69F . Please Return: red - marked covenants, signed revised originals + 1 copy to file, check for recorder Copies To: File Via: Messenger Mail Fax D Other D Received By: AA, Date: 2- 27c(—O;? Title: Location: Ph: —r CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Services Department - 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, Ca. 92024 -3633 Phone (760) 633 -2770 Fax (760) 633 -2818 TRANSMITTAL LETTER To: Laret Eng Date: 10/13/06 Attn: Stu From: Stephanie Kellar Subdivision Engineering Phone: 858 - 756 -9374 Phone: (760) 633 -2839 Owner: Staver Drawing #: 6242 -G, 6857 -G, 327 -CS Site Address: Rancho Summit Dr Planning Case #: 98 -272 APN: 264 - 033 -10 & -11 Plancheck #: cc chk 3 Engineering Comments: Add SWPP cert, minor modifications to FH in /adj to the swales. Copy of SWPPP needs to be submitted to Engineering for updated approval by Storm Water. Parks has approved dwgs. New -sheet and construction change fees to be assessed in bond and fee letter. Execute and return sewer easement and storm water maint cov. Please schedule an appt/ ask for me at the counter when you have made the revisions so that we can go over them together at the counter, and I can authorize you to change the mvlars. Water Comments: n/a Planning and Building Comments: n/a Parks and Recreation Comments: n/a Fire Comments: n/a Public Works Comments: n/a Please Return: 2 sets prints to Eng, Copies To: File File Via: Mess "n ilO Fax O Other O Recei y' Date: Title: c on: Ph: m Construction Change Charges: Plan New Sheet Major Change Minor Change Erosion Control Totals CS -327 fee 3,4,5,6,7 8,9,10,11 5750 480 none 0 none 0 1 6230 6857 -G fee 3,4,5,6,7,8 6900 1,2 420 none 0 9,10,11,12,13,14 1050 8370 6242 -G fee 2.5,6,7.8,9.10,11A,12,13,14,19, 13800 1,16,18 630 3,4,15,17 480 21,22,23,24,25,26 1050 1 15960 Total Fees: 30560 TOTAL PAS PAOV'DE- 9Mour frg4 -r7-/E TEES �4LRE-ADY DUE THE QECF_iPT C d,/,�'TQ tJCT1UhI PD. 10. 13.ote R CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Services Department - 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, Ca. 92024 -3633 Phone (760) 633 -2770 Fax (760) 633 -2818 TRANSMITTAL LETTER To: Laret Eng Attn: Stu Phone: 858 - 756 -9374 Owner: Staver Site Address: Rancho Summit Dr APN: 264- 033 -10 & -11 Date: 8/30/06 From: Stephanie Kellar Subdivision Engineering Phone: (760) 633 -2839 Drawing #: 6242 -G, 6857 -G, 327 -CS Planning Case #: 98 -272 Plancheck #: cc chk 2 Engineering Comments: Need shallower swale sideslopes and longitudinal slopes- drop structures? Unsure of how well the Type F CB will work in the swales, concerned about the tops sticking up above the flush curb >> traffic hazard: can you give me something to show me that will work? Need maint agree, SWPPP cert, additional trail easement for portion of trail outside exist easement. Water Comments: n/a Planning and Building Comments: n/a Parks and Recreation Comments: n/a Fire Comments: n/a Public Works Comments: n/a Please Return: 2 sets prints to Eng, File Copies To: File Via: Messenger I O Fax O Other O Received By: I Date: Title: Location: Ph: E. 4NEERINC SERVICES DEPART. NT Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering City of Traffic Engineering Encinitas RELEASE OF ORIGINAL DRAWINGS & DOCUMENTS DATE RELEASED: 4 - - 01 DATE DUE BACK: AS-AZ RETURNED? PROJECT NUMBER: 01% - -2--T -Z DRAWING NUMBER: &2 -47- � A/CS /CG/DI/ES/I/I- 5 1G/HWY I0l/I / M/ PCJPM /R/ROSIRS/SUTM/TPMrFS/UCS/UES SHEET /PAGE NUMBER: DESCRIPTION: �awt� t2 s*� �� R tZ�C oCLOI�TCcSN epia/Linen/Paper PLAN RELEASED TO: NAME: 1" t6 Coo ATTN: Lot. BLUEPRINT COMPANY/OTHER REOUESTOR ADDRESS: STREET 2 a�—raO C�t2V=) \ CITY STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER:( Ca l°L )- 5CA'A - Co 2-33 PURPOSE OF RELEASE: (Circle One) Duplication/Construction Change/As -Bui ecordation PLAN CHANGE DESCRIPTION: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: gC-w¢3-1 The undersigned acknowledges that the drawings and/or documents described above are the property of the City of Encinitas. The undersigned accepts all responsibility for the drawings and/or documents and will return said drawings and/or documents before the date specified above. _ /2 PLANS RECEIVED BY: Please sign _ COURIER COMPANY: �(1� SJ S C) PREPARED BY: 1 - Authorized Department Representative ISGIARR/Release.dod02. 02.99 1 of TEL 760 - 6332600 2 FAX 760- 633 - 2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 0 reeyded paper E GINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT city o Encinitas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering October 3, 2002 Attn: General Bank 1420 East Valley Blvd. Alhambra, California 91801 RE: Adam's Run, LP 3540 Fortuna Ranch Road TPM 98 -272 Grading Permit 6277 -G Final release of security Permit 6277 -GI authorized earthwork, storm drainage, site retaining wall, and erosion control, all as necessary to build the described project. Therefore, a full release of the security deposited is merited. Letter of Credit RP210006, in the amount of $77,208.00, is hereby released in its entirety. The document original is enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, W N Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Field Operations CC: lay Lembach, Finance Manager Adam's Run, LP File Jay Lembach Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 7604,33 -200 FAN 76(1. 635.102- in+ ti Culc:m A, enue. Fnciniia.. California 9202 +3613 TDD 7(Ml -633 -2700 4 recyaw paper ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CiO Capital Improvement Projects ty f District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations October 3, 2002 Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering Attn: American Motorists Insurance Company C/o Lou Jones & Associates P.O. Box 41375 7470 N. Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90041 RE: Adam's Run, LP 3540 Fortuna Ranch Road TPM 98 -272 Grading Permit 6277 -G Final release of security Permit 6277 -G authorized earthwork, storm drainage, and erosion control, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the grading as shown on approved plan. Therefore, release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 3SM 986 656 00, in the amount of $308,832.00, is hereby fully exonerated. The document original is enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, Masih Mahe Senior Civil Engineer Cc: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Adam's Run, LP / Benamel Development file enc. �vv,� ay 11kach Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 760- 633-2(>-A ' F.aC -60- 633.202 ;05 5. vulcm .4vrnuc. Encinitas. Califomia 92424 -3633 TIM 760- 633 -27W rwyded paper ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT O Capital Improvement Projects City f District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering October 3, 2002 Attn: American Motorists Insurance Company C/o Lou Jones & Associates P.O. Box 41375 7470 N. Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90041 RE: Adam's Run, LP 3540 Fortuna Ranch Road TPM 98 -272 Grading Permit 6277 -G Final release of security Permit 6277 -G authorized installation and grading for the public trails, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the installation of the trail and all of the grading per approved plan. Therefore, release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 3SM 986 657 00, in the amount of $18,594.00, is hereby fully exonerated. The document original is enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Siinncejreelly, Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Cc: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Adam's Run, LP / Benamel Development file enc. ay LBmbach Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 760-633-2600 / FAX 760 -633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas. California 920243633 MD 760 - 633.2700 4 Mcyded papa/ ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City Of Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations October 3, 2002 Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering Attn: American Motorists Insurance Company C/o Lou Jones & Associates P.O. Box 41375 7470 N. Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90041 RE: Adam's Run, LP 3540 Fortuna Ranch Road TPM 98 -272 Improvement Permit 6277 -I Final release of security Monumentation Bond Final release of security The final monuments have been set, therefore, release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 3SM 986 658 00, in the amount of $1500.00, is hereby fully exonerated. The document original is enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, _ Masi h Mahe Senior Civil Engineer Cc: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Adam's Run, LP / Benamel Development file enc. 1 htfV1L— Jay Lembach Finance Manager Financial Services TF.L ?N)41i3 -260n FA \'(Ml {,34-2o2- io i 5. \'idcan .A%cnne. Encinitas. California 92023 -3(033 TDD ,60 -6,33 -2700 a recycled paper NGINEERING SERVICES DE' 'TiVENT TRANSMITTAL FORM Copilol Improvement Pr Dishnef support Se Field Oper 5ubdvision Engine Traffic Engine FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) JX Traffic Engineering (TE) O District Support Services �D) ❑ Office of the Director (#I) Field 0 erations (FO) ❑ T p ATTENTION: v DATE: Regarding (Finance Number - -eff3 DEPO /FEE TP AT, 1N[,D�' (Finance Number _) DEPO 13 "JY�� � /��% (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Cotnments/Additional Space for Document: Interoffice Memorandum' ❑ Plancheck Comments* D Legal Description ❑ Plat O Other: ❑ Easement m. Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ •(Staff/ Consultant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Drainage Cl ❑ Assessments ❑ Sketch (if needed): Agreement re: n Improvements O Pvt. Rd. Maint. O i� Check • /L "-(iI/� (.��IC/� Improvement Plan ❑ Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments* O (Pubhu/Private) (Road/Drainage/Water /Sewer r ' ark/Facility) - -- Intermediate Descriptio ' rCheckprint/App�provel ding Plan Check Cop y/ rginal/Rejected Plancheck Comments• ❑ Plan Change Description: Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Hydrology Study/Map ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ (Erosion ontroVPlanting & Irrigation) As Per... Ourconversation Q., Nly /your inquiry ❑ Our Review Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval O For your... C ection Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return Please call if necessary Originator: Copies to: V Messenger + Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ I Received by: Date: A Title: Location. Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SUARR/Generic Trani dod01 11 99 1 of I ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Copilot Improvement Proje, District Support Servic Field Operatic Subdivision Engineen, Troffic Engineedi T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Pill" Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ p District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (NI) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: D11AN'L& 7V0&P70i✓ DATE: Regarding (Finance Number 6 Z% % - _ DEPOSIT TPMlTM/MUP/MIN/DR: ✓� _ Z% L/ (Finance Number � DEPOSIT/F E 1. 1gQQAAS 9UtJ (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: 26 ¢ - SAS/ - yJ Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved 7M/I -PM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title reportfvesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail Sewer ❑ Park Drainage ❑ Agreement re: EJ ❑ Improvements ❑ ❑ Impact Fees ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ EJ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ _ uornmentVAaattlonali Npace for Document 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: CiCE Additional Notes: co A c cM-OLrn �L /JS/ttT • ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/T /CATV) Sketch (if needed) / Description: Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Roa&DrainagcfWa ter /Sewer /TraiVPark/Facility) Grading Plan Eq""' SubmittaUPlan Chang As -built Proposed ❑ Corrected Approved cc • ❑ Blueline Red -lined 0� Checker nt Original EEr Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Nanting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Requirements 2-00' Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review 5 Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: (Name) r_ ?- (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600fFAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG /ARK/lnna Trans dod02 11 99 1 of I To: PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX(858)259 -4812 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CITY OF ENCr IITAS. WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: Attached ❑ Under separate cover THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Date: Job No. 8 -01 -02 786 Attn: DUANE Re 6477G AS- BUILTS ADAMSRUN Copies Date No. Description 1 ORIGINAL MYLARS 1 OLD RED -LINE BLUE -LINES I COPY OF RECORDED TRAIL ESMT 2 NEW BLUELINES ❑ For approval ❑ For your use As requested ❑ For review and conunent REMARKS: I �_ ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) O District Support Sq*es (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (kl) ATTENTION: Regarding (Finance Number (Finance Number - _� DEPOSITIFEE (Finance Number - DEPOSIT/FEE Transmitted n following: Final Parcel Map ❑ rival Map ❑ _ Submittal/Amended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TMrf'PM O Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report(Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: COpital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ �� APN: Comments/Additional Space for Document 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street New Change Applicatiq 5) Other A 6) Copies to: I Additional Notts: r Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements C1 WD/0 C D/G /CATV) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Ske ed)/ tion: ❑ Agreement re: Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ �/�`� Improvement Plan Submittal/Plan Change/As-Built / Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Cross ne/ Sections ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Stru rota Icula[ions ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ I /��� (Public/Private) �/ � /`'"" Note: Seto bl r ' tonal items, if any. e� ( rainag ater /Sewer/TraiVParWFBCII ) �E Gradln bmittal/Plan Ch As- built ' Propose o e e Approved ❑ cc' Bluelin ed a Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculation ap ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. Of (Erosion ConhoVPlanting & Irrigation) As Per... Submit�l );equiremenfs Our Conversation ❑ Public tnquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval El For Your... Revie Use ❑ , Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: (Name) G (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARMntra Trans.doc/02.11.99 I of I To: PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CITY OF ENCINITAS. WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: E Attached ❑ Under separate cover THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Date: Job No. 7 -8 -02 786 Attn: DEBBIE Re AS BUILTS 6277G ADAMSRUN Copies Date No. Description 2 As requested RED -LINE BLUELINES I ORIGINAL MYLARS :4_1 1 ❑ For approval For your use ❑ As requested For review and comment REMARKS: DEBBIE, pECEE W� D JUL 82002 ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS THESE ARE THE AS- BUILTS THAT DUE TO SOME CONFUSION IN HOUSE WE DRAFTED THE CHANGES ON THE MYLARS BEFORE WE SENT YOU THE RED -LINE BLUELINES. �7JLoe as 03/05/2002 08:52 FAX 760 943 2226 CITY OF ENC -DEV SERVICES � sssssssssssssssssssss sss TX REPORT sss sssssssssssssssssssss Q001 TRANSMISSION OK TX /RX NO 3560 CONNECTION TEL 918582594812 SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID ST. TIME 03/06 08:51 USAGE T 00'36 PGS. SENT 2 RESULT OK TRANSMITTAL FORM FAX 760/943 -2226 City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Engineering Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 760/633 -2770 DATE SEND TO FAX#'✓ ,0. OF PAGES: TO: OF: ADDRESS: FROM PHONE: _ (760) 633-2 / ❑ Call ASAP ❑ Review & Call ❑ please Handle ❑ Per Our Conversation ❑ Review & Return ALLY -Y.I. ❑ Please Reply by TRANSMITTAL FORM FAX 760/943 -2226 City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Engineering Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 760/633 -2770 DATE SEND TO FAX #,,76,2! ���—Z I NO. OF PAGES:_ TO: _ OF: _ ADDRESS: FROMM: PHONE: (760) 633- Z7 ❑ Call ASAP ❑ Review & Call ❑ Please Handle ❑ Per Our Conversation COMIv1ENTS: ❑ Review & Return ❑ Please Reply by Val Debra Geishart - 6277 -7 TPP 98 -272 From: Masih Maher To: Debra Geishart Date: 3/5102 11:36AM Subject: 6277 -G, TPM 98 -272 Debbie The sewer lateral for this project causes impact that requires re- vegetation. The applicant shall perform the re- vegetation and obtain planning's approval before we could release the grading and improvement bond. Please make sure that the bond is not released before Scott Vurbeffs approval. Masih CC: Paul Dupree; Ruben Macabitas; Scott Vurbeff Page 1 DOC 2001 - 0197429 APR 03, 2001 10:41 AM Recording Requested By: ) OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO CM RECORDER'S OFFICE City Engineer ) GREGORY J. SMITH, COl O RECORDER FEES: 29.00 When Recorded Mail to: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas. CA 92024 1 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDERS USE ONLY PRIVATE ROAD KG MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR TPM 98 -272 Assessor's Parcel No. 264­61- 'CO ProjectNo.: TPM 98 -272 W.O.No.: THIS AGREEMENT for the maintenance and repair of that certain private road easement, the legal description and/or plat of which is set forth in Exhibits V A A attached hereto and made a part hereof, is entered into byAD4 WS CUM L L P _(hereinafter referred to as "Developer ") for the benefit of future subdivision lot owners who will use the private road easement (hereinafter referred to as "lot owners ", which shall include the Developer to the extent the Developer retains any ownership interest in any lot or lots). WHEREAS, this Agreement is required as a condition of approval by the City of Encinitas of a subdivision project as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources code and pursuant to City of Encinitas Municipal Code Section 24.16.060 and Section 24.29.040; and WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of certain real property being subdivided and developed as TPM 98 -272 that will use and enjoy the benefit of said road easement. A complete legal description of said real property is attached, labelled Exhibit, and incorporated by reference. Said real property is hereinafter referred to as the "property "; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Developer that said private road be maintained in a safe and usable condition by the lot owners; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Developer to establish a method for the maintenance and repair of said private road easement and for the apportionment of the expense of such maintenance and repair among existing and future lot owners; and 4 �l Recording Requested by: City Engineer When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue DOC 9001 - 0197496 APR 03. 2001 10:41 AM OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER FEES: 35.00 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE 01y -�� COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: h G PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel No. 05 - 00 Project No.: TPM 98 -272 W.O. No.: A. Adam's Run L.P. (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TPM 98 -272 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of public improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required public improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter) , SUBDIVIDER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: C "^ Recording Requested by City Engineer When Recorded Mail To City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue DOC 2001 - 019'742-'7 APR 030 2001 10:41 AM OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO CITY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SNITH, CUTY RECORDER FEES: 35.00 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE / 99 / COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel No. 264 -4 51 -05 -oo Project No.: TPM 98 -272 W.O. No.: A. Adam's Run L.P. (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TPM 98 -272 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of private improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required private improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter) , SUBDIVIDER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Exhibit B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. SUBDIVIDER agrees that SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. El. JEERING SERVICES DEPARTA. T INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG /ARRAntra Frans. doc/02. 11 99 1 of I T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE � Traffic Engineering (TE) E] O District Support Services C—D) ❑ Office of the Director (#I) Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: l n - C)t QCpirr DATE: r,� Regarding (Finance Number 2--r-7 �� DEPOS EE TPMlTM/NIUP/MIN/DR: %Z (Finance Number _, DEPOSIT/FEE " Si T t h.IP yw-" (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: �Amended/Corrected Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel M>Prrec!tEe(di nal Map ❑ I) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Exhibit Proposed ❑ ❑ Ap prov ,pd ❑ Inte ffice Memo• ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprin Origin Certificate ❑ gastal Miscellaneous ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolutio of Approval Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Pannersbip Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter" ❑ Deferred Monumersation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: p Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee p ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: 0 ( CD/ CS/ FIRF/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &FJI7CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees Cl Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ �e LAeoE Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ 1 `� Improvement Plaa ❑ SubmittaVPlan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage / Water /Sewer/fraiVPark/Facility) Grading Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc • ❑ Blueline/Red-lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal R uirement� Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Revie Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: 1 (dame) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG /ARRAntra Frans. doc/02. 11 99 1 of I j' PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: CITY OF ENCINITAS WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: 0 ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Date: Job No. 04/05/2001 PE 786 Attn: Tamra O'Neil Re: 6277 -PM Silverwood/Fortuna Ranch Copies Date No. Description 1 4 Mylars 2 4 Bluelines THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ FOR YOUR USE 0 AS REQUESTED ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT REMARKS: Reflects the sewer revisions Signe oe Yuhas ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdvision Engineering Traffic Engineering 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/Inua Trans doc /02.11 99 1 of I T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services �_D) ❑ Office of the Director (N 1) Field Operations (FO) ❑ �A'1"1i�rCIL DATE: 5��� ATTENTION: Regarding (Finance Number Z- - ��EPO T/FE TP M/MUP/MIN/DR: 2' 2 (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE Diu (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blue] me/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: i Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Pannership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: ' (CD /CS/ FIRE /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G&EJT /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑��` Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Mainz. ❑ ❑ ����, Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ •L Q� Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) �r Note: See other block fora ditional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer /TraiVPark/Facility) Grading Plan Ian Chan s -built Proposed ❑ Ca r;c❑ cc Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submi al uirements ❑ Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Reevvilew Use E) Approval p Signature El Information Cl ORIGINATOR: L, tl� (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/Inua Trans doc /02.11 99 1 of I r� Recording Requested By: City Engineer When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 DOC X001- 019742-8 APR 03, 2001 10 -4T OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COIATPt RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, COLFTY RECORDER FEES: 0.00 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR DRAINAGE Assessor's Parcel No. 2G4- 4 51 - 05 -0o Project No.: TPM 98 -272 A. Adam's Run L. ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. rETE ® DEVEL0� Opening opportunities, building a future Post Office Box 270649, San Diego, CA 92198 -0649 Tel 858.613.2990 www.benamel.com April 9, 2001 City of Encinitas Engineering Department Attn: Ms. Tamara O'Neill 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Adam's Run LP, Sewer Main Deletion Consent (TM 98 -272) Dear Tamara, Fax 858.613.2999 I have signed an agreement with Alan Archibald giving the consent of Adam's Run, LP to the deletion from the project's improvements of a previously required Public Sewer Main. I remain in agreement with this earlier statement and here by reiterate my and Adam's Run L.P.'s consent to the deletion of the previously approved sewer main and attendant easements from the project's Final map, Improvement Plans, and any related plans and /or agreements. S Silverwood Jent, RSF Ben Inc. ral Partner, Adam's Run, LP Attachment. notarized acknowledgment CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of ss. �N � \ec \O On �iixx1 1,-2-c Dale personally appeared Plate Notary Seal Above impersonally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. j my hand and Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document:ie - W( b CIA-ii Or ey%c_ttllkc.S Document Date: IA Q(1 \ G 2- c 0o-) Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: MVtaye. Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ❑ Individual Top or thumb here ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner —❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing 01988 Wtwul NOlary ASSOC ialion• 9050 Oe$ OIO AVe..P0.B0�'1IO2•Lhelsworlll, CA 9101'JZW2•eww.nellmelnOtary.wg PrvE NO. 5907 Reaee, Cal TO-Free 1 �76E BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT 8586132999 03/14 101 17:15 x'0.720 04/04 C11 I r rr m d o {-h JCnn,�t� f To: Company, . Fax: Phone: From: Date: Pages: Re: Oear Dale: Lou Jones & Assocl&tes "Surety Bond Specialists" 7470 North Figueroa St., Los Angeles, CA 90041 Phon�:323- 257 -8291 Fax: 323 -341 -5404 Dale Harshaw jor.:i Burnham & Compa; y 1- 619.696 -3119 Davin Noddle S M3r4h 13, ?001 2 Adams Run, L.P. (Benamel Development) - Honid # I received your fax rage-ding the non requirement of the at ove referenced bond. In order to make a consicerfCon for a refund of (he premi, T paid for this paid, 1 will need fot the .;ity c.' Encinatas to reference the following In a mitten letter. They should reference the epecific bond # (33M 986 659 UO) as being issued through Amencrn Motorists Insurance Company as surety. It s!iovld also reference the principal name on the bond as Adams Run, t..° Lastly, it should confrn, thvt no v,o"s ever started and thus no liability aver existed fc, the a un.y, � rrorican Motorists Insurance Company. As you know generally premium is fully earned upon issuai ce of a bond- This bond was issl e i (2) months ago. If I receive an acceptable :rtfer from the City of En.indas, I wil see what I can do, but I can't guarantee you that Kemper will , flat' the entire premium � o.id. Please advise if you have a ly questions. Sincerely, David Noddle THE INFOILVATION, ONTADXD IN THIS TRANyMISSlON MAY BI PRI MZC;Ztl AND;L4% (UINTA) k l -1NF[DHdPI1kL INFORMATION r%TENIrED ONLY FOR THE VIE OF TAC INDMDUAL OR ENTrrY NAMZD ARC ✓' 'F 7,.% READER ON' THUS MESSAGE IS NOT TIIE RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLUYEV OR AGENT RESPONSIEiLE TO ULLI VL A it TO THE rMA LADED RECIPIENT, :'�:' W HP.'RM NOTIBIED rL,T h fY DISSEMINATION, DLUMSUTION JP. COPYL` G OF TIUS COMMUNICATION 13 SIR C%T PROHIHUTED. FF YOL HAN I'; RECEIVED 111113 TRANSMoSIOWN LIP % PLEASE NOTIFY US BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT °586132999 03/14 101 1-7:14 N3.720 01/04 BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT, INC, P.O. Box 270649 San Diegu. CA 92198 -0649 Phone: 858-613-2990 Fax: 858 -613 -2999 Fax To �^ C O} From V ► � Co: Dept: Pf wee: Pages: F= '%0 — (p 33 D O 18 Data Re: \ CC: Comments: C3 r�e� kQl-r- um\,qr 1 � f S OPENING oPPop,rLINITIES. BUILDING A INEERING SERVICES DEPART, HMO VT Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineenng Traffic Engineering Building Permit Number: - NONE PP ies) Assessor's Parcel Number: 7421/ DEVELOPMENT FEE SUMMARY The City of Encinitas has adopted regulations that require the payment of fees that will contribute to the funding of new infrastructure needed as a result of private development projects. Impact fees assessed and collected through the City Engineer's office that have a citywide benefit are as follows and further described per the given references. Fees Flood Control Traffic Mitigation Account No. 232 -0000- 343.30 -00 233 - 0000 - 343.30 -00 Ordinance No, 97 -19 91.24 Municipal Code 23.96 23.94 Other impact fees may be applicable, and include, but are not limited to, fire mitigation fees (Fire Prevention Bureau), park and recreation fees (Current Planning Division), school fees (Cardiff School District, Encinitas Union School District, or San Dieguito Union High School District), sewer fees (Cardiff Sanitation District, Encinitas Sanitary District, or Leucadia County Water District), water fees (Olivenhain Water District or San Dieguito Water District), and the like. Please inquire at the appropriate counter. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ORDINANCE FEE PREP BY: Flood Control S / 7 /9 E ineer's S' atu�re Traffic Mitigation S DATE: O�ljq tu —r1 — TOTAL / < S ` Proje A ress Community Area yldolu s /3�„ 141D 7 Applicant's Name Telephone Private Rd: (street name) (dwwg) (case) See worksheet on backside for multiple permits. ISGIA RRMevel_Fee_Sum_Sht I .doc/ i 2.23.99 DATE PAID: I 0 RECEIPT #: Received By: A— <4 1 of 2 TEL 760 - 633 -2600 / FAX 760 - 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avcnuc, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760- 633 -2700 1� recycled paper ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACT10N FORM DATE 01 le O1 APPLICANT NAME ' / 5 1 ?a4i APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT NUMBER ,der �faloh9 .sv �q 9zj 5� -0� RECEIPT NUMBER bO �1 I l7 CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER AgreementICovenant 101-0000-345-0100 CN Construction E .... i 0. Exempt Organizations 101-0000-345-0700 GI Grading Plancheck FM Grading Inspection 13 58� Final Map Processing PN 101. 0000 - 3452100 Parcel Map Processing Permanent Encroachment Improvement Plancheck Improvement inspection 7 �� Temporary Encroachment Street Vacation Street Name Change A.P.N. Report Security Deposit TOTAL Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 AC 101-0000-345-0100 CN .... . 0. E .... i 0. GR 101-0000-345-0700 GI 101-0000-345-0800 FM 101-0000-345-0500 PM 101.0000- 3454)600 PE 101-0000.3451100 U101-0000.345 -0900 h 101- 0000 -345 -1000 TE 101 -0000 -345 -1200 VA 101- 0000 -345 -1500 SN 101-0004345.1300 PN 101. 0000 - 3452100 CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSIT ACTION FORM DATE ITa;lIW1.iA.UlsL4 APPLICANT ADDRESS f7: 7,,Fl t619191:i 11 I2 FA N7:7 F— TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER I RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER 6T_F ff 4 7I:I1EW1 ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE - ED IECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED PROJECT NUMBER FIELD PROJECT # TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE - SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN) PROJECT t 1 r AMOUNT TOTAL CARDIFF SANITh r ION DISTRICT APPLICANT PROjcCT ACTION FORM APPLICANT WPO,51T NA L� DATE ADDRESS O APN TD0 424 e Z — PERMIT # DEPOSITS TO ACCOUNT #501 -0000- 213 -00 -00 (A) (B) (C) (D) Overhead Total City Project Applicant Project Charges Expenses Descript/Code Number Deposit Expenses (Col B x %1 (Col B +C) Sewer Constructiontyy2j O Qf,/F1 Permit (E1) v D Security (SY) TOTAL / Debit 501 -0000- 213 -00 -00 CHECK REQUEST (BILLING) AMOUNT (E) Refund or Amount Due (Col A-Col D) Engineering AUTHORIZATION: Services Project Coordinat Department FINANCE: / Processed B Date 1 ` f ?S C REVENUE FUND ACCOUNT CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 502 0000-349 -80 AN EQUITY (-EXPANSION -) FEES cancelled ($830/EDU /Zming for annexation appliction) 503 0000-34930 CP CAPACITY FEES - Wastewater Discharge permit (53417 /EDU, 52501 o nechon Cardiff Trunk Bond Fee, and $1001connectbn Encinitas Boulevard Upgrade) 505 0000-349 -410 RM RECLAMATION FEES - Wastewater Discharge Permit cancelled ( 51,000 /EDU if annexed after 91'21 182) 501 0000 -34950 PS PROCESSING FEES - ($700/5800 fee for annexation application, 5% fa reimbursements, $150 for Connection Agreements) 501 D000- 210-00 SR REIMBURSEMENT FEES - Wastewater Discharge Permit (8658) DuVivw, direct a indirect Other* Name. 501 D00D -34920 SC SERVICE H RGE - Wastewater i ftarge iiiii hp- 41k 0 /E � %1 fw Engineering AUTHORIZATION: Services Project Coordinat Department FINANCE: / Processed B Date 1 ` f ?S C American N o or" -J nsurance Comp: j KemveR. FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULLY EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 986 659 00 Premium (Two Years): $662.00 SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE (SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Adams Run, L-P., A California Limited Partnership, as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City or Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Forty -Four Thousand One Hundred Forty -One and 00 /100 Dollars ($44,141.00), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a agreement with the City of Encinitas to do and perform the following work; to wit: Public Sewer Improvements (Sewer Construction Application DCS360) NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED. SEALED. DATED: January II. 2001 Principal Adams Ru% L.P., A California By: RSF W 1W-, Cen�tal -f B_v 1— .lohn SiM rwood, Surety fer$hip American Motorists Insurance Company DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: In LOU JONES 8 ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 . FAX (323) 256 -7218 Subdivision Performance Bond - 08- 25 -99.dN State of California ) County of San Diego ) On January 11, 2001 before me, Tara Bacon, Notary Public, personally appeared Dale G. Harshaw, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. TARA COMM. #ACON k WITNESS my hand and official seal ,. � '�- COMM. #1132721 n U NOTARY PUBLIGCALFORNIA rn b SAN DIEGO COUNTY U C My COmmisswn Expires a� -� APRIL3,2001 State of California County of San Diego On 1/12/01 d1ATE1 personally appeared before me, Julia A. Hattler, Notary INAME/TITLE Of OFFICER- ,...*JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC1 John Silverwood INAMEISI OF SIGNERISII ® personally known to me -OR- ❑ (SEAL) II proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose narril Is /aEe subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledg ed to me that he /sheltbey executed the same in his /hefAheir authorized capacity(il s), and that by his /hefitheir signature(,$) on the instrument the person(g), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(y) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal INT-VIYUH1S1INIVIII I The information requested below and in the column to the right is OPTIONAL. Recording of this document is not required by law and is also optional. It could, however, prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to any unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE THleorlry"ol Docu rrt Sewer Const. permit Bond MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT Numbn of Pape. _ Dais. of Documnt 1/11/01 DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Speeds) Other Then Named Abcw Dale a- Harshaw WOLCOTTS FORM 61240 Re.. 9,94 (poae era 9 ]A) oI 994 WOLCOTTS FORMS, INC. ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT WITH SIGNER CAPACITYRiEPRESENTATIONT D FINGERPRINTS RIGHT THUMBPRINT (Optionsll a n CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIONERISI ❑INDIVIDUALIST ❑CORPORATE _ OFFICERIS) ETITU9 14PARTNER(S) OLIMITED C)IGENE RAL OATTORNEY IN FACT ❑TRUSTEEIS) ❑GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (Name of Person lU or Emdy(les) -Adams-Run LP RIGHT THUMBPRINT (Optional) 3 0 a CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNERS) ❑INDIVIDUALIST OCORPORATE OFFICER(S) n.TIES OPARTNERISI OLIMITED OGENERAL OATTORNEY IN FACT OTRUSTEE(S) OGUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OOTHER: SIGNER tS REPRESENTING: INsrns of Penon(s) or Enthybes) 1111111111PI111111111111�1 b 8 • Insurance Cc nle. Commercial Linea ..rnop AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY Home Office: Long Grove, IL 60049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Men By These Presents: That the American Motorists Insurance Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, and having its principal office in Long Grove, Illinois, does hereby appoint Jack G. Lupien, Debra J. Niemeyer, Dale G.1Harshav, Tara Bacon its true and lawful agent(s) and attomey(s) -in -fact, to make, execute, seal, and deriver during the period beginning with the date of Issuance of this power and ending December 31, 2001, unless sooner revoked for and on Its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: Name of Principal: ADAMS RUN L.P. Bond No.: 3SM 986 659 00 Penal Sum: $ 44, 141.00 Name of Obligee: CITY OF ENCINITAS Description: PERFORMANCE BOND FOR PUBLIC SEWER IMPROVEMENTS EXCEPTION. NO AUTHORITY is granted to make execute seal and deliver any bond or undertaking which guarantees the payment or collection of any promissory note, cfteck, draft or letter of credit This authorityty does not permit the same ob1'� anon to be split into two or rare bonds In order to bring each such bond within die dollar M11t of authority as se forth herein. This appointment may be revoked at any time by the American Motorists Insurance Company. The execution of such bonds and undertakings In pursuance of these tppsr�eassn�dmtpsushall be as binding upon the said. executed andtaacckrnowledged by Its regularlyfeellecteedd o��rsat � principal offce In Long �Grovee �irnmoiis had been duly THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001. This Power of Attorney is executed by authority of a resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of said American Motorists Insurance Company on February 23, 1988 at Long Grove, Illinois, a true and accurate copy of which is hereinafter set forth and is hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being in full force and effect 'VOTED, That the Chairman of the Board, the Presiden or any Vce President, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary or the Secretary sha�l have the power and authority to appoint agents and attomeys in -tact, and to authorize Them to exewte on behalf of the Cow and attach the seal of the Company thereto bonds and undertakings, reoognizances, contracts of Indemnity' ndother waitings, oblgatory 1n the nature the and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process." This Power of Attorney is signed sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the followin resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duty called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: "VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President any V ce President or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certificatons by the Secretary , may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attomey or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the F�cecutive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and ce rtified with respect to any bond or undertakng to wh ch t is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company." In Testimony Whereof the American Motorists insurance Company has caused this instrument to be signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by its authorized officers, this 26th day of July , 1993. Attested and Certified: AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY Robert P. Harries, Secretary J. S. Kemper, III, Exec. Vice President NOTE: ANY ERASURES OR WHITE OUT WILL VOID THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY. STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF LAKE 5s I, Irene Klewer, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that J. S. Kemper, III and Robert P. Hames personally known to me to be the same.persons whose names are respeclivety as Exec. dice President and Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company, a Corporation of the State of Illinois, subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day In person and severally acknowledged that they being thereunto duly authorized signed, sealed with the corporate seal and delivered the said instrument as the free and voluntary act of said corporation and as their own free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth. ........................ "OFRCIAL SEAL- ; IRENEKLEVTR NOTARY PUBLIC. STATE OF RI.ITKNS � My C...".. E.ple 1.n. 2&2802 My commission expires: 1 -28-02 CERTIFICATION WA � Irene Klewer, Notary Public I, J.K Conway, Secretarryy of the r h rican Motorists Insurance Company, do hereby ce rtify that the attached we of Attomey dated Juty 26 1993 on behalf of the persons) as listed on The reverse side is a We and correct copy and that thme as been in full force and eiiffsince the date forceand effn e date of thrtificate; and I do further certify that the said J. S. Kempper III and Robert P. Hamel who exearted the Power of Attomey as Exec. Vice Presldent and Secretary rrspective}y were on the date of the execution of the attached Power of Attomey the duty elect ed Exec. dice Presldentt and Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company. Motorists TESTIMONY ce Company I have on thisereI subscribed nTy name day of and ANRA" he corporat10l of the American U J. K Conway, Corporate Secretary This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds and undertakings specifically named therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated. TO VERIFY THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY, CALL (847) 320 -2108. FM 362 -10 55-91 Power of Attorney - Term PRINTED IN U.S.A. Amevcan Motories Insurance Company rm!mpem FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULLY EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 986 657 00 Premium (Two Years): $279.00 SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE (IMPROVEMENT PERMIT - TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Adams Run, L.P., A California Limited Partnership, as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to tratLSact surety business in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Eighteen Thousand Five Hundred Ninety -Four and 00 /100 DOLLARS ($18,594.00), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be [Wade, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a agreement with the City of Encinitas to do and perform the following work; to wit: Public Trail Improvements (Improvement Application627712) NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to retrain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALED, DATED: January 11, 2001 Principal Adalns Run, L.P., A California By: RSF BEtj INC,, Geneyd4 By: Silverwood, Surety American Motorise Insurance Company m DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: LOU JONES 8 ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 . FAX (323) 256 -7218 Subdivision Performance Bond - OA- 25 -99. dnt v State of California County of San Diego ) On January 11, 2001 before me, Tara Bacon, Notary Public, personally appeared Dale G. Harshaw, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. �\ VIL (A LL MAE BACON 2221 p�,�ppp� n OUNTVU C XP�rss 001 t State of California County of San Diego On 1/12/01 (DATE) personally appeared before me,Julia A. Hattler, Notary INAMERITLE OF OFFICER- i.e.'JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC') John Silverwood (NAMEIS) OF SIGNERISII N personally known to me -OR- ❑ �rae .41 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons) whose name(s) Is /afe subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /sh(akfaey executed the same in his /heF/Ebeir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /hef-E it signature(al on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(S) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. ISEALI 4 CU - ISIGNATURE OF NOTARVI ATTENTION NOTARY The information requested below and in the column to the right is OPTIONAL. Recording of this document is not required by law and is also optional. It could, however, prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to any unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Tale or Type of Documem Trail Imp. Bond Number of Pages Date of Document _ 1/11/01 DAle IS Spnerlsl Other Than Nerved Abow Harshaw WOLCOTTS FORM 63240 Rel. 394 Imms Cm 6 3A) (c)i 684 WOLCOTT$ FORMS. INC. ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT WITH SIGNER CAPACITYRiEPRESENTATIONRWO FINGERPRINTS RIGHT THUMBPRWT (Optional 3 0 0 CAPACITY CLAIMED By SIGNER(S) OINDIVIDUALIS) ❑CORPORATE OFFICER(SI nun'. 64PARTNERISI OLIMITED WENERAL OATTORNEY IN FACT OTRUSTEE(S) OGUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OOTHER: Adams Run LP SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: W ema of Peraon(al w Ento(jeal RIGHT THUMBPRINT [Optional) 3 0 CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER(S) I IINDIVIDUALISI I )CORPORATE OFFICLR(5) ITnFal DPARTNER(SI DLIMITED OGENERAL OATTORNEY IN FACT OTAUSTEEMI DGUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OOTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: IN... of Personls) or Entitylies) 7 (III67775 I63III40 I � Insurance C dea Commereiel Lir �p AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY Home Office: Long Grove, IL 60049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Men By These Presents: That the American Motorists Insurance Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, and having its principal office in Long Grove, Illinois, does hereby appoint , Jack G. Lupien, Debra J. Niemeyer, Dale G.rHarshaw, Tara Bacon its We and lawful agent(s) and attorney(s)-in-fact, to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the date of issuance of this power and ending December 31, 2001, unless sooner revoked for and on Its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: Name of Principal: ADAMS RUN Bond No.: 3SM 986 65 7 00 Penal Sum: $18,594.00 Name of Obligee: CITY OF ENCINITAS Description: PERFORMANCE BOND FOR PUBLIC TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY is granted to make execute seal and deliver any bond or undertaking which guarantees the payment or collection of any promissory note, aeck, draft or letter of credit This authori t�yyr does not permit the same obligation to be split Into two or more bonds In order to bring each such bond within 61e dollar limit of authority as set forth herein. This appointment may be revoked at any time by the American Motorists Insurance Company. The execution of such bonds and undortaki in pursuance of these preset shall be as binding upon the saki. American Motorists Insurance Company as fifly and amply to all Intents ct and ppurposes, as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by its regularly elected officers at Its principal office In long Grove, Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001. This Power of Attorney is executed by authority of a resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of said American Motorists insurance Cowpany on February 23, 1988 at Long Grove, Illinois, a being n faccurceeacend y of which is hereinafter set forth and is hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as "VOTED, That the Chairman of the Board, the President or any Vice Pres dent, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attorneys in -fact and to authorize (hem to execute on behalf of the Co�par�y, and attach bite seal of the Company thereto bonds and undertaidngs, recognizances, contrails of indemnity and other writings, obfgatogJn -the nature thereof, and any such olTicers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process.^ This Power of Attorney is signed sealed and certified byy facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Execu(ive Committee of the 8card of Directors of the Company at a meeting duty called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: "VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, arty V ce president or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certifications by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attomey or band executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company." In Testimony Whereof the American Motorists Insurance Company has caused this instrument to be signed and its corporate seal to be at'fixed by its authorized officers, this 26th day of July , 1993 Attested and Certified AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY Robert P. Harries. Secretary J. S. Kemper, III, Exec, Vice President NOTE: ANY ERASURES OR WHITE OUT WILL VOID THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY. STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF LAKE ss I, Irene Klewer, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that J. S. Kemper, III and Robert P. Hames personally known tome to be the same ,persons whose names are resp - chvely as Exec. Vice President and Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company, a Corporation of the State of Illinois, subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day In person and severally acknowledged that they being thereunto duly authorized signed, sealed with the corporate seal and delivered the said instrument as the free and voluntary act of said corporation and as their own free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth. ........................ "OFFICIAL SEAL^ IRENEKLEWER **NOTARY KMUC. STATE OF [IJ.WOM *M7 Gmmiuioa Ecplev l�n 2t, 2003 My commission expires: 1 -28-02 CERTIFICATION Irene Klewer, Notary Public I, ' Conway, Secretarryy of the American Motorists Insurance Company, do hereby cer�(y that the attached Power of Att omey dated Juty 26 1993 on behalf of the persons) as listed on the reverse side is a true and correct copy and )hat the same has been in full force and effffecYsince the date thereof and is in full forceand effect on the date o this certificate; and I do further certify that the said J. S. Kemper III and Robert P. Hamel who execrrted the Power of Attomey as Exec. Vce President and Secretary respecfive�y were on the date of the execution of the attached Power of A omey the duty elected Exec. Vce President and Secretary of the American Molor sts Insurance Company. tristsInsurance opan ereI 1subscribed anflpMoots Cmny o thisTH day of gthe corporat�Ml of the American U J. K_ Conway, Corporate Secretary This Power of Attorney limits the ads of those named therein to the bonds and undertakings specifically named therein, and they have no authority to tend the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated. TO VERIFY THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY, CALL (847) 320 -2108. FM 362 -10 5-91 Power of Attomey - Term PRINTED IN U.S.A. American Motor' '-s Insurance Compey KemPel:. FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULLY EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 986 658 00 Premium (Two Years): $100.00 SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE (IMPROVEMENT PERMIT - DEFERRED MONUMENTS) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Adams Run, L.P., A California Limited Partnership, as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the stun of One Thousand Five Hundred and 00 /100 DOLLARS ($1,500.00), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, adminiso-ators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a agreement with the City of Encinitas to do and perform the following work; to wit: Setting of Land Survey Monuments (Improvement Application 6177fR) NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perfontt the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALED, DATED: January 11, 2001 Principal Adams Run, .P., A Califor r arts By: RSF 8 I ., Geier 1 P By: r ` .lohn Silverwood, Prkident Surety American Motorists Insurance Company By Dale G. Harshaw, Attorney -In -Fact DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: In LOU JONES 8 ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 . FAX (323) 2511-7218 Subdivision Pcrfunnance Bond - 08- 25 -99A" State of California ) County of San Diego ) On January 11, 2001 before me, Tara Bacon, Notary Public, personally appeared Dale G. Harshaw, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal R-)" A (k C�-- TARA BACON i .v COMM. #1132721 c� NOTARY PUBLIGCALIFORNIA V) U u ;AN DIEGO COUNTY 0 i My Commission Expires 1. �.¢ APRIL 3. 2001 State Of _ Ca 1 i fnrn i a County OfSan Diego On 1112101 beforeme,Julia A. Hattler, Notary IDATEI INAMErE1TLE OF OFFICER ...'JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC -1 personally appeared John Silverwood MAME(SI OF SIGNERS11 D1 personally known to me -OR- ❑ 1 9 ...; ' proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) Ware subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /shekhey executed the same in his /hef{ their authorized capacity(i"), and that by his /ho0th it signature(c) on the instrument the person (s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(g) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. (SEAL) l- (SIGNATURE OF NOTARY) ATTENTION NOTARY The information requested below and In the column to the right is OPTIONAL. Recording of this document is not required by law and is also optional. It could, however, prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to any unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Deferred Monument Bond Trtb or Type of Document Number of Pepe, Data of Document 1/11/01 sipneHsl Dther Than Nernee Alww Dale G. Harshaw WOLCOTTS FORM 63140 R.. 3 -94 W.ca 0. B 1A) 01994 WOLCOTTS FORMS. INC. ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT WITH SIGNER CAPACITYMEPRESENTATIONRWO FINGERPRINTS RIGHT THUMBPRINT )Optional) 0 CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER(S) OINDIVIDUALISI 17CORPORATE OFFICERIS) rtmLR CRPARTNERIS) ❑LIMITED WENERAL OATTORNEY IN FACT OTRUSTEE(S) ❑GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: INama of Par,onbF) or Entitylieq Adams Run LP RIGHT THUMBPRINT IOptionall 3 CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNERIS) OINDIVIDUALIS) ❑CORPORATE OFFICER(S) ITin[A OPARTNERISI ❑LIMITED ❑GENERAL []ATTORNEY W FACT OTRUSTEE(S) O GU A RDIANICONSE R V ATOR ❑OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (Name of Person(.) or Entnylie,l 7 ))))VIII VIII I III 63240 III 18 ICeMMR. Insurance C. lies C.mmvc;al Lin ip AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY Home Office: Long Grove, IL 600-49 POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Men By These Presents: That the American Motorists Insurance Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, and having its principal office in Long Grove, Illinois, does hereby appoint Jack G. Lupien, Debra J. Niemeyer, Dale G.rlfarshav, Tara Bacon its true and lawful agent(s) and attomey(s) -in -fact, to make, execute, seal, and defrver during the period beginning with the date of issuance of this power and ending December 31, 2001, unless sooner revoked for and on Its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: Name of Principal: ADAMS RUN L.P. Bond No.: 3SM 986 658 00 Penal Sum: $ 1,500.00 Name of Obligee: CITY OF ENCINITAS Description: PERFORMANCE/ PAYMENT BOND FOR SETTING OF LAND SURVEY MONUMENTS EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY is granted to make execute seal and deliver any bond or undertaking which guarantees the payment or oollection of any promissory note, neck, draft or letter of credit This authority does not permit the same obligation to be sprit iftte two or more bonds In order to bring each such bond within the dollar funit of authority as set forth herein. This appointment may be revoked at any time by the American Motorists Insurance Company. The execution of such bonds and s in pursuance of these , shall be as binding upon the saki. American Motorists Insurance Company as fly and amply to all intents end ppurposes, as ff the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by Its regularly elected officers at Its principal office In Long Grove, Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001. This Power of Attorney is executed by authority of a resolution adopted byy the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of said American Motorists Insurance CompaFebruary y on Feary 23, 1988 at Long Grove, Illinois, a true and accurate copy of which is hereinafter set forth and is hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being in full force and effect "VOTED, That the Chairman of the Board, the President or any Vce Pres dent, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agants and attorneys -in -fact and to authorize Them to execute on behalf of the Comte and attach the seal of the Company thereto bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity andcther writings, obligaicxy an the nature thereof and any such offcers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of p ocess." This Power of Attorney is signed sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Lioard of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: "VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice President or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certificat ors by the Secretary , may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attomey or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company." In Testimony VNmereof the American Motorists Insurance Company has caused this instmment tc be signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by its authorized officers, this 26th day of July , 19 93 Attested and Certified Robert P. Hames, Secretary AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY J S. Kemper, III, Exec, Vice President NOTE: ANY ERASURES OR WHITE OUT WILL VOID THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF LAKE ss I, Irene Klewer, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that J. S. Kemper, III and Robert P. Harries personalty known to me to be the same,persons whose names are respectivey as Exec. Vice President and Secretary Or the American Motorists Insurance Company, a Corporation of the SState of Illinois, sutucrihed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day in person and severally acknowledged that they being thereunto duty authorized signed, sealed with the corporate seal and delivered the said instrument as the free and voluntary act of said corporation and as their own free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth. ........................ "OFFICIAL SEAL" IRENE KLEWER ; *.NOTARY MUC, STATE OF 111lNOrS *MY Cammiaaloe Ecpim Jae. 21, 2002 � My commission expires: 1 -28-02 CERTIFICATION Irene Klewer, Notary Public I, J.K Conway, Secretarryy of the American Motorists Insurance Company, do hereby certify that the attached Power of Attomey dated Juty 26 1993 on behalf of the person(s) as listed on a reverse side Is a true and correct Copy and chat the same has been in full force and effffectsinoe the date thereof and is in full force and effect on the date of thts certificate; and I do further certify that the said J. S. Kemper III and Robert P. Hames who executed the Power of Attomey as Exec. Vice President and Secretary resvely were on the date of the execution of the attached Power of Attomey the duty elected Exec. Vice President and Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company- IN ESST NY W paherel nt subscribed my na o ai�jfi Axg the corporat2�l of the American Insurance Company on have f J. K. Conway, Corporate Secretary This Power of Attomey limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds and undertakings specifically named therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated. TO VERIFY THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY, CALL (847) 320 -2108. FM 362 -10 5 -91 Power of Attomey - Term PRINTED IN U.S.A. American Motor' `s Insurance Compoy KemPOIT. Bond Number: 3SM 986 658 00 MONUMENTATION PAYMENT BOND (IMPROVEMENT PERMIT - DEFERRED MONUMENTS) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Adams Run, L.P., A California Limited Partnership, as Principal, and AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto Ilse City of Encinitas as Obligee, in the sum of One Thousand Five Hundred and 00 /100 Dollars ($1,500.00) lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which suns well and truly to be made, We bind ourselves jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION 1S SUCH, That, Whereas, said Principal has entered into a Subdivision Agreement with the City of Encinitas in which said Principal agrees to the following: Payment to the Preparer of the Map or Successor (Improvement Application 6277IR) NOW, THEREFORE, if said Principal fails to snake payment to the Preparer of the Map or Successor, said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the sum set forth above. SIGNED. SEALED, DATED: January 11, 2001 Al B By: Principal Surety American Motorists Imsurance Company Dale G. Harshaw, Attorney -In -Fact Subdivision Payment Bond - 08- 25 -92dd DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: In LOU JONES & ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 . FAX (323) 256 -7218 Subdivision Payment Bond - 08- 25 -92dd State of California County of San Diego ) On January 11, 2001 before me, Tara Bacon, Notary Public, personally appeared Dale G. Harshaw, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. TARA BACON k WITNESS my hand and official seal. - COMM. #1132721 n U) NOTPAY?LIC-CALIFO$Jf IA v� U SAN DIEGO COON MIA 0 My Commiswn APRIL 3, 2001 Stateof California County of San Diego On 1/12/01 before me,Julia A. Hattler, Notary MATO INAMERITLE OF OFFICER ,...'JANE OOE. NOTARY PUBDC'I personally appeared John Silverwood INAMEISI OF SIGNERISII ® personally known to me -OR- ❑ (SEAL) Fr proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons) whose name(s) Is /afe subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged tome that he /she#taey executed the same in his /herkheir authorized capacity(jes), and that by his /het tteir signature(s') on the instrument the person(N), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(M acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. ATTENTION NOTARY The information requested below and in the Column to the right is OPTIONAL Recording of this document is not required by law and is also optional. It could, however, prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to any unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE Trtb or Type of Document Monumentation Payment Bond MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Papas Date of D=u M 1/11 / 0 1 DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: spr»rIFl Other Than Named Abo� Dale G. Harshaw WOLCOTTS FORM 09240 Rev. 9 94 (price clue 9 ]A) 01990 WOLCOTTS FORMS, INC. ALL PURPOSE ACRNOWLEOGMENT MATH SIGNER CAPACITYMEPRESENTATION/TWO FINGERPRINTS RIGHT TTIUMBMINT IOptlonal) s 8 CAPACITY CLAIMED By SIGNERISI ❑INDIVIDUALIST ❑CORPORATE OFFICER(S) >JJPARTNER(S) ❑LIMITED %!GENERAL ❑ATTORNEY IN FACT OTRUSTEEIS) ❑GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: IName of Pnreonls) or Entitylieel ADams Run LP RIGHT THUMBPRINT (Optional) CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNERIS) LIINDIVIDUAL(S) ❑CORPORATE OFFICER(S) IOTLEA OPARTNERIS) ❑LIMITED DGENERAL OATTORNEY IN FACT DTRUSTEE(S) OGUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: IName of Personls) at Entity Reel 7 III IIIIIIII VIII I II63240 I B KeMPER. Insurance -c dea Commercial Li, �p AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY Home Office: Long Grove, IL 60049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Men By These Presents: That the American Motorists Insurance Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, and having its principal office in Long Grove, Illinois, does hereby appoint Jack G. Lupien, Debra J. Niemeyer, Dale G.iRarshav, Tara Bacon its true and lawful agent(s) and attomey(s)4n -fact, to make, execute, seal, and deriver during the period beginning with the date of issuance of this power and ending December 31, 2001, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: Name of Principal: ADAMS Bond No.: 3SM 986 658 00 Penal Sum: s 1 .500.00 Name of Obligee: CITY OF ENCINITAS Description: PERFORMANCE/ PAYMENT BOND FOR SETTING OF LAND SURVEY MONUMENTS EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY is granted to make execute seal and deriver any bond or undertaking which guarantees the payment or collection of any promissory note, neck, draft or letter of credit This authori ty does not permit the same obligation to be sprit into two or more bonds In order to bring each such bond within tyre dollar limit of authority as set forth herein. This appointment may be revoked at any time by the American Motorists Insurance Company. The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as bindurg upon the said American Motorists Insurance Company as fully and amply to all Intents and purposes, as if the same had been duty executed and acknowledged by its regularly elected officers at its principal office in Long Grove, Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001. This Power of Attorney is executed by authority of a resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board or Directors of said American Motorists Insurance Company on February 23 1988 at Long Grove, Illinois, a true and accurate copy of which is hereinafter set forth and Is hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being in full force and effect "VOTED, That the ha an of the Board, the President or any Vce Pres dent, or theirappointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attorneys in -fact and to aulhar Z Them to execute on behalf of the party, and attach fho seal of the Company thereto bonds and undertakings, necognizances, contracts of Indemnity andotherwritings, obligatory In the nature thereof; and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process." This Power of Attorney is signed sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Hoard of Directors of the Company at a meeting duty called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: 'VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice pres;denc or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certifications by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company." In Testimony Whereof the Amencan Motorists Insurance Company has caused this instrument to be sioned and its corporate seal to be affx-d by its authorized officers, this 26th day of Juty to 93 Attested ,Ind Certified Robert P. Hames, Secretary AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY J- S. Kemper, III, Exec. Vice President NOTE. ANY ERASURES OR WHITE OUT WILL VOID THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY. STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF IAKE ss 1, Irene Klewer, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that J. S. Kemper, III and Robert P. Hames personalty known to me to be the same,persons whose names are respectively as Exec. Vice President and Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company, a Corporation of the State of Illinois, subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day in person and severally acknowledged that they being thereunto duly authorized signed, sealed with the corporate seal and delivered the said instrument as the free and voluntary act of said corporation and as their own free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth. ........................ "OFFICUILSEkV IRENE HLEWER NOTARY MMUC, STATE OF RlO4095 M7 Ca..Wlva Espim Jed M2002 � My commission expires: 1 -28-02 CERTIFICATION Irene Klewer, Notary Public 1, J.K. Conway, Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company, do hereby that the attached Power of Attomey dated July ry6 1993 on behalf of the persons) as listed on a reverse side is a true and correct copy and ittat the sj has been in full farce and a ectsince the date thereof and is in full force and effect on the date of this and I dfurther certify that the saki J. S. Hames who executed the Power of ec. Vice Psident and Secretary te f the executioof e attached Pof omy the duty eleed ExecV ce President and Secretary of the rican Motosts Insuce com. IN TESTIMONY InsNY WHEREOF, y orr ve herel hereunto subscribed my name ar�r�RPtxgthe corporatF�l of the American 0 J. K Conway, Corporate Secretary This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds and undertakings specifically named therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated. TO VERIFY THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY, CALL (847) 320 -2108. FM 362 -10 5-91 Power of Attorney - Term PRINTED IN U.S.A. 0 0 800 West 61h Street General Bank' Los Angeles, CA 90017 c j{�� TLX 188455 GBC UT SWIFT: GBCBU562 it 7 '{ � 4r IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO.: RP210006 ADVISING BANK BENEFICIARY Citv of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 F] 1620 E. Valley Blvd. Alhambra, CA 91801 Fair IS 18) 2844632 �Lt E OF ISSUE. ' anuary 17, 2001 APPLICANT 5gR L.P. EE ENCSN\ 885 West Bernardo Drive., Suite 385 N� CF San Diego, CA 92127 AMOUNT UP TO $ 77,2US.UO (Seventy seven two hundred eight EXPIRY DATE January 17, 2002 EXPIRY PLACE At our coulter Gentlemen. This Letter of Credit is given to fulfill the requirements of City of Encinitas, Engineering Services Department, hereinafter called "City", and Adams Run, L.P. A California LP hereinafter called the "Principal ", covering certain faithful performance on sewer construction for the project with tenauve tract no. 98 -272 located in City of Encinitas, California. As required by the city, General Bank, hereinafter called the "Bank ", does hereby establish in favor of city, and for the account of Principal, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. RP210006 in the amount of $77,208.00 insuring payment of labor and material to be paid by drafts at sight on the principal if accompanied by the following documents: Citv's written statement, signed by the authorized signer on behalf of city, certifying that there has been non- performance of duties on the said works on the said project in the amount accompanying a sight draft on us and that the amount of this draft is therefore now due and payable. Any monies received pursuant to this Letter of Credit shall be used for the installation of, and payment for, said required improvements on referenced project and for performance of all terms of aforesaid costs and reasonable attorney's fee, incurred by city in successfully enforcing subject obligation to be awarded and fixed by the court, and be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgement therein rendered. It is agreed that the abme funds are on deposit in a separate fund and guaranteed for payment, and said fund shall become trust fund for the purpose set forth herein as required by Section 66499 through 66499.10 of the Government Code of the State of California All drafts under this Letter of Credit shall be marked: Drawn Under General Bank: 1420 East Valley Blvd., Alhambra, CA 91801 For the account of Adams Run, L.P., A California Limited Partnership Irrevocable Letter of Credit No.: RP210006 This Letter of Credit expired one year from the date hereof and shall be deemed automatically extended Without amendment for a one - year period upon such date and upon each anniversary of such date, unless at least sixty (60) days prior to such date or each anniversary of such date we notify city in writing by registered mail that we elect not to so extend this Letter of Credit. Upon receipt by CITY of such notice, city may automatically draw the full amount remaining on this Letter of Credit by a clean draft, with no supporting documents, and Bank will pay city upon Receipt of such draft. Principal expressly agrees with you that all drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms of the Letter of Credit shall meet with due honor upon presentation. Except so far as otherwise expressly stated, this documentary credit Is subject 10 the 'Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits- (1993 Revision) International Chamber of Commerce Publication No 500 We hereby engage with drawers and/or bona fide holders that drafts drawn and negotiated in conformity with the terms of this credit witl be dui honored on luesentdhen The amount of each draft must be endorsed to reverse of this crude by the negotiating bank. ALL BANKING CHARGES OUTSIDE GENER BANK. LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA ARE FOR ACCOUNT OF THE BENEFICIARY. —7`f1 RE AM 12194) ADVISING BANK'S NOTIFICATION'. Rel, No., Place. Date, Name 8 Signature of the Advising Bank. °rican Motories Insurance Comp; Y Kemper:. FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULLY EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 986 656 00 Premium (Two Years): $4,632.00 SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE (GRADING PERMIT) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Adams Run, L.P., A California Limited Partnership, as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Three Hundred Eight Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty -Two and 00/100 DOLLARS ($308,832.00), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, successors, and assign~, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a agreement with the City of Encinitas to do and perform the following work; to wit: Earthwork, Private Road and Drainage Improvements and Erosion Control (Grading Application 6277GR) NOW, THEREFORE, if die above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then dus obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALED. DATED: January 11, 2001 Principal Adams Run, L.P., A California rmt i By: RSF •N I ., G era By -1 .John Silvemood'4tfsid4nt Motorists Insurance Company Dale G. Harshaw, A orney -In -Fact DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: In LOU JONES & ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 . FAX (323) 2567218 Suhdivision Performance Bond - ON-25-99.dot of t State of California ) County of San Diego ) On January 11, 2001 before me, Tara Bacon, Notary Public, personally appeared Dale G. Harshaw, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal AaA'ACON _ COMM. *1132721 n U NOTARY LIGCALIFORNIA y COUNTY �? U �� My Commiion Expves q APRIL3,2001 State of California County of San Diego On 1/12/01 beforeme, Julia A. Hattler,Notary DATE) INAMERITLE OF OFFICER ,..'JANE DOE. NOTARY PU8LIC "1 personally appeared John Silverwood INAMEMI OF SIGNEMS)1 IN personally known to me -OR- ❑ II Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personN whose name(&) Is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledg ed to me that he /sey executed the same in his/h@4+ reir authorized capacity(es), and that by his /he0their signature(S) on the instrument the person(g), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(t) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal stnll (SIGNATURE OF TARYI ATTENTION NOTARY The information requested below and in the Column to the right is OPTIONAL. Recording of this document is not required by law and is also optional. It could, however, prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to any unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Trt1e or Type of Document Number of Pages Grading Permit Bond Date of Docurnent 1/11/01 Sigm,(s)Other Than Named Above Dale G. Harshaw WOLCOTTS FORM 63140 Wv. 3,04 laae cim 8 -IA) 01990 WOLCOTTS FORMS. INC. ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT MATH SIGNER CAPACITYINEPRESENTATIONR O FINGERPRINTS RIGHT THUMBPRINT (Optfonag 4 a CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNERS) OINDIVIDUALISI MCORPORATE OFFICER(SI OPARTNERIS) OUMrTED IHGENERAL ❑ATTORNEY IN FACT ❑TRUSTEEISI ❑GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (Na. of Pe,soRla) or E- 140a4 Adams Run, L.P. RIGHT THUMBPRINT (OptlonaR 3 0 0 CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SfGNERIS) OINDIVIDUALISI ❑CORPORATE OFFICERISI nlnF9 OPARTNERIS) OLIMITED OGENERAL ❑ATTORNEY W FACT OTRUSTEEISI ❑GUARDIANICONSERVATOR OOTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (Name of Permn(O or Entity(ies) 7 IIII67775 6I IIIIIIIIII 8 IVEMPOR. Insurance Cot .lei Commercial Lines group AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY Home Office: Long Grove, IL 60049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Men By These Presents: That the American Motorists Insurance Company, a corporation orgah¢ed and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, and having its principal office in Long Grove, Illinois, does hereby appoint Jack G. Lupien, Debra J. Niemeyer, Dale G.iRarshav, Tara Bacon . its true and lawful agent(s) and attomey(s)4n -fact, to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the date of issuance of this power and ending December 31, 2001, unless sooner revoked for and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: Name of Principal: ADAMS RUN L.P. Bond No.: 3SM 986 656 00 Penal Sum: $ 308,832.00 Name of Obligee: CITY OF ENCINITAS Description: PERFORMANCE BOND FOR_ EARTHWORK PRIVATE ROAD AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND EROSION CONTROL EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY is granted to make execute seal and deliver any bond or undertaking which guarantees the payment or collection of any promissory note, alack, draft or letter of credit This authodttyy does not permit the same obliggation to be split Into two or more bonds in order to bring each such bond within le dollar Ilmit of authority as se forth herein. This appointment may be revoked at any 6me by the American Motorists Insurance Company. The execution of such bonds and undertakings in pursuance of these pry shall be as binding upon the said American Motorists Insurance Company as iufy and amply to all Intents and purposes, as If the same had been duty executed and acknowledged by Its regularly elected officers at its principal offce In Long Grove, Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001. This Power of Attorney is executed by authority of a resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of said American Motorists Insurance Company on February 23, 1988 at Long Grove, Illinois, a true and accurate copy of which is hereinafter set forth and Is hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being in full force and effect "VOTED, That the Chair an of the Board, the President or any Vce Pres dent, or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Coon' ary or the Secretary shad have the power and authorty to appoint agants and attomeys -in -fact, and to ze Them to execute on behalf of the Comppaanr�yy and attach the seal of the Company thereto bonds and undegs reoogntzances, contrails of indemnity andather writings, obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of process." This Power of Attorney is signed sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988 "VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President, arty Vice president or their appointees designated in writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certifications by the Secretary, may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney or bond executed pursuant to resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company." In Testimony Whereof the American Motorists Insurance Company has caused this instrument to be signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by its authorized officers, this 25th day of Juh+ 1 19 93 Attested and Certified Robert P. Hames, Secretary AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY J. S. Kemper, III, Exec, Vice President NOTE: ANY ERASURES OR WHITE OUT WILL VOID THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY. STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF LAKE ss I, Irene Klewer, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that J. S. Kemper, III and Robert P. Hames personally known to me to be the same persons whose names are respectively as Exec. Vice President and Secretary of the American Motorists Insurance Company, a Corporation of the State of Illinois, subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day in person and severally acknowledged that they being thereunto duly authorized signed, sealed with the corporate seal and delivered the said instrument as the free and voluntary act of said corporation and as their own free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth. "OFFICIAL SEAL" IRENE KLEWER NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF ILLINOIS A MT Cemmiubv Eapi r ).. IL, 2002 eeeee.eeeeeeeeeee.•ee••• My commission expires: 1 -28-02 CERTIFICATION Irene Klewer, Notary Public I, J.K Conway, Secretaryry of the American Motorists Insurance Company, do hereby ce that the attached Power of Attomey dated July 26 1993 on behalf of the persons) as listed on a reverse side is a true and correct copy and �tiat the same has been in full force ande iiffectsince the date thereof and is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the said J. S. Kem r III and Robert P. Hamel who executed the Power S Attomey as Fxec. Vice President and Secretary respec rvely were on the date of the execution of the attached Power of y omey the duly elected Exec. Vice President and Secretary of the Amercan Motorists Insurance Company. IN TESTIMONY InONY WHEREOF, y on a here) nto subscribed my day name anf��"the corporat�Mfi of the American V J. K Conway, Corporate Secretary This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds and undertakings specifically named therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated. TO VERIFY THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY, CALL (847) 320 -2108. FM 362 -10 5-91 Power of Attorney - Term PRINTED IN U.S.A. City Of Encinitas 22 March, 2001 Attm David Noddle Lou Jones & Associates 7470 North Figueroa St. Los Angeles, CA 90041 Re: Sewer Construction Permit No. DCS 360 A.P.N. 264 -451 -0500 Release of security Bond # 3SM98665900 (principal name: Adams Run, L.P.) Permit No. DCS 360 authorized the construction of a public sewer main to provide service to a four -lot subdivision in the community of Olivenhain. The property in question is currently located within two existing Sewer Reimbursement Agreement areas, as a result of which the developer will be required to connect directly to the existing sewer mains in the vicinity of the project. The public sewer main permitted via DCS 360 will not be constructed. Work on this project was never started, thus no liability ever existed for the surety, American Motorists Insurance Company. Release of the security deposit is therefor merited. Performance bond # 3SM98665900 in the amount of $44,141.00 is hereby released. The instrument original is enclosed Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Masih Maher at (760) 633- 2776 or in writing, attention the Engineering Services Department. Sincerel�y, Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Development Review cc: Leslie Suelter, City of Encinitas John Silverwood, Adams Run, L.P. file enc. Leslie S Financial Services Manager Financial Services TEL 760 -633 -2600 1 FAX 760 -633 -2627 905 S. Vulcan Avenue. Fncinitas. California 72024 -3633 'rDD - 60- 6ii.2-00 1� recycled paper 4 American Motorists Insurance Company lummR. FIRST TERM PREMIUM FULLY EARNED Bond Number: 3SM 986 659 00 Premium (Two Years): $662.00 SUBDIVISION BOND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE (SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, Adams Run, L.P., A California Limited Partnership, as Principal, and the AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City or Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Forty -Four Thousand One Hundred Forty -One and 00 /100 Dollars ($44,141.00), for which the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE Condition of die foregoing obligation is such that, whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a agreement with the City of Encinitas to do and perform the following work; to wit: Public Sewer Improvements (Sewer Construction Application DCS360) NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALED, DATED: January 11, 2001 Principal Adams Ru L.P., A California Li dte By: RSF I f ., Gen 4'eP n Bv: If 14— .John Silverwood, Presid t Surety American Motorists Insurance Company By: �ie-� /j- Dale G. Harshaw, Attorney -In-Fact DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: 01 LOU JONES & ASSOCIATES, PO BOX 41375, 7470 N. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90041 PHONE (323) 257 -8291 . FAX (323) 256 -7218 Subdivision Performance Bond - 08- 25- 99.dot State of California County of San Diego ) On January 11, 2001 before me, Tara Bacon, Notary Public, personally appeared Dale G. Harshaw, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. COTARA6ACON fl ,. � MM. x1132721 n NOTARYp�gL"ALFDRNIA 'n uni SANDIEGO. COUNT/ U v r My Commission Expires i�w� APRIL 3. 2001 State Of California County Of San Diego On 1/12/01 IDATEI personally appeared before me, Julia A. Hattler, Notary INAMERITLE OF OFFICER,.e.VANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC', John Silverwood INAME(SI OF SIGNEAISII ® personally known to me -OR- O (SEAL) CIA A HATM Fn con. - / 113M onDD* p� My Canm EON Apr 22, ZDI proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) Is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledg ed to me that he /sbelibey executed the same in his /heFA-heir authorized capacity(+es), and that by his /herfthelr signature(b) on the instrument the person( ,$), or the entity upon behalf of which the persons) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal ATTENTION NOTARY The information requested below and in the column to the right is OPTIONAL. Recording of this document is not required by law and is also optional. It could, however, prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to any unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Docurrmere Sewer Const. Dermit Bon MUST BE ATTACHED 1/11/01 TO THE DOCUMENT Number, of Pepe Date of DocEemnt DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Sipnerls) Other Then N�md Abow Da1e G Harchaw WOLCOTTS FORM 63340 Rev. 3 94 tPrice clew 0 2A) (D 1994 WOLCOTTS FORMS, INC, ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT MATH SIGNER CAPACITYMEPRESENTATION/ O FINGERPRINTS RIGHT THUMBPRINT (Optione0 V 3 0 CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNERIS) C7INDIVIOUAL(S) ❑CORPORATE OFFICERIS) jd PARTNER(S) ❑LIMITED WENERAL OATTORNEY IN FACT OTRUSTEE(S) OGUARDIANICONSERVATOR DOTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING; Mss of Pereonls) or Entity(ieel fr _ u RIGHT THUMBPRINT (Optionell r 3 0 6 CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNERIS) OINDIVIDUALISI ❑CORPORATE OFFICER(S) InT1FA DPARTNERISI OLIMITED DGENERAL OATTORNEY IN FACT DTRUSTEE(S) O GUA RDIANICON SE R V A TOR OOTHER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (Na. of Persons) or Entltybes) 7 IIIII77 II63240 8 MEMPER. Insurance Companies Commercial Lines Group AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY Home Office: Long Grove, IL 60049 POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Men By These Presents: That the American Motorists Insurance Company, a corporation orgah¢ed and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, and having its principal office in long Grove, Illinois, does hereby appoint Jack G. Lupien, Debra J. Niemeyer, Dale G.)Harshav, Tara Bacon. its true and lawful agent(s) and attorney(s)-in-fact to make, execute, seal, and deliver during the period beginning with the date of Issuance of this power and ending December 31, 2001, unless sooner revoked for and on Its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: Name of Principal: ADAMS RUN L.P. Bond No.: 3SM 986 659 00 Penal Sum: $ 44,141 .00 Name of Obrigee: CITY OF ENCINITAS Description: PERFORMANCE BOND FOR PUBLIC SEWER IMPROVEMENTS EXCEPTION: NO AUTHORITY is granted to make execute seal and deliver any bond or undertaking which guarantees the payment or collection of any promissory note, neck, draft or letter of credit This authority does not permit the same obligation to tie split into two or more bonds In order to bring each such bond within the dollar limit of authority as set forth herein. This appointment may be revoked at any time by the American Motorists Insurance Company. The execution of such bonds and and @rhaIsr s In pursuance of these pr�ser�� shall be as binding upon the said. American Motorists Insurance Company as Ity, and amply to all Intents and purposes, as If the same had been duty executed and acknowledged by its regularly elected officers at Its principal offce In Long Grove, Illinois. THIS APPOINTMENT SHALL CEASE AND TERMINATE WITHOUT NOTICE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2-001. This Power of Attorney is executed by authority of a resolution adopted by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of said American Motorists Insurance Company on February 23 1988 at Long Grove, Illinois, a true and accurate copy of which is hereinafter set forth and is hereby certified to by the undersigned Secretary as being in full force and effect 'VOTED, That the Chairman of the Board, the President Diary Vice president, or their appointees designated in wr ling and filed with the Secretary or the Secretary shall have the power and authority to appoint agents and attorneys in -fact and to authorize Them to execute on behalf of fhe Com�y and attach the seal of the Company thereto bonds and undertakings, recbgnizances, contrails of indemnity' rid other writings, obligatory In the nature thereon and any such officers of the Company may appoint agents for acceptance of p ocess " This Power of Attorney is signed sealed and certified by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the ExecuWe Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duty called and held on the 23rd day of February, 1988: "VOTED, That the signature of the Chairman of the Board, the President any Vice President or their appointees des'gnated in writing and filed with the Secretary, and the signature of the Secretary, the seal of the Company, and certi fcations by the Secretary, may be affo ed by facs'mlle on any power of attorney or bond executed pursuant to resolution adoptad by the Gcecutive Committee of the Board of Directors on February 23, 1988 and any such power so executed, sealed and certified with respect to any bond or undertaking to wh ch it is attached, shall continue to be valid and binding upon the Company." In Testimony Whereof the American Motorsts Insurance Company has Caused this instrument to be signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by its authorized officers, this 26th day of Jul/ , 1993. Attested and Certified Robert P Hames, Secretary AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY J S. Kemper, III. Exec, Vice President NOTE ANY ERASURES OR WHITE OUT WILL VOID THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM APPLICANT NAME I/1a.21 t-AA —< - 26 (LLC. APPLICANT ADDRESS (P//O Zr- >X Z -7 0 GLi-I S 0121 ye PERMIT NUMBER RECEIPT NUMBER ((/ ✓�[' `� CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Aixtrr -,rO� Cv -7(:- Agreement)Covenant AC 101-0000- 345-0100 Construction CN 101 - 0000 - 345-0200 Exempt Organizations (/ EX 101 - 0000 - 3450400 Grading Plancheck GR 101.00003450700 Grading Inspection GI 101-0000- 345 -OBW Final Map Processing FM 101-0000 - 3450500 Parcel Map Processing PM 101-00003450600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101 °,45 -1100 Improvement Plancheck IR 101-0000- 345 -0900 Improvement inspection II 101 -0000. 3451000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101 -0000- 345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101-0000 - 3451500 Street Name Change SN 101. 0000 - 345 -1300 A.P.N. Report PN 101 - 0000 - 345 -2100 Securtty Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL I'y'O()• OD Permrt Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct15199£ ENGINEERING uEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOS�I ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR F- TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE = ED ECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED PROJECT NUMBER FIELD I PROJECT # I TOTAL I AMOUNT I ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE = SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN) PROJECT # AMOUNT TOTAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE ( //O OO APPLICANT NAME 60 5 wco C, Co e GnJ $ �roGGP e- r4 i � S APPLICANT ADDRESS �j R 0 p v t y'yA Dr. No 106 PERMIT NUMBER 61►z %PM G- a 12 Z RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER e2 % CASHIER INITALS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant AC 101-0000- 345 -0100 Construction CN 101-0000. 345-0200 Exempt Organizations IX 101-0000 - 345-0400 Grading Plancheck -1�3600, 06 GR 101-0000.345 -0700 Grading Inspection GI 101 -0000. 345-0800 Final Map Processing FM 101-0000 - 345 -0500 Parcel Map Processing O PM 101. 0000 -345 -0600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101-0000-34S -1100 Improvement Plancheck IR 101-0000 -345 -0900 Improvement inspection II 101.00003451000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101 - 0000 -345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101. 00003451500 Street Name Change SN 101. 00003451300 A.P.N. Report PN 101 -0000- 345 -2100 Security Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL 6 , 61 OD . O 0 Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSIT ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: CITY OF ENCINITAS WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: Attached ❑ ❑ Under separate cover THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Date: Job No. 1 -18 -01 786 Attn: DUANE Re: TPM 98 -272 JOHN SILVERWOOD Copies Date No. Description I ORGINAL MYLARS 6277G I ORGINAL MYLAR CS360 1 PREVIOUS CK PRINTS THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: El E] approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment REMARKS: j,%,i 1 8 200 Signe JOE YUHAS PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX(858)259 -4812 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Engineering City of Encinitas 0 .7i 0 1'i•1�J� N Attached ❑ Under separate cover THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Date: Job No. January 11, 2001 PE 786 Attn: Tamera O'Neal Re: Copies Date No. Description ❑ As requested I set of inter -office memo's, PM guarantee, new PR dated vesting doc for Adam's Rut LP, supporting easement dot's iet(- J4P !1 Zoo/ I Sempra Energy 66436 Itr and Right of Arrangement Ltr I Covenant Regardind Real Property 1 LIMITED PARTNER AGREEMENT (authorizes John Silverwood to execute doe's & instruments) 1 sight distance exhibit, set of orig. tapes and revised portions I Sign Mylars 5t' revision THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: REMARKS: Signed Dan Comerford For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment REMARKS: Signed Dan Comerford IINEERING SERVICES DEPART - ANT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvemenl Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Intra Trans.doc /02.11 99 1 aft T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services L_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) Operations (FO) ❑ IIField ATTENTION: TAwgof t d 0EAd— DATE: Regarding (Finance Number 64EPO TT(JjED TP,M,fI1VMUP/MIN R: _q2 -z %z (Finance Number -�) EQ'�IFEE (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document yr Final Parcel Map Kid Map ❑ ���endeci/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ C6 ected ❑ Approv d ❑ I e Memo• ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red- lined Checkprint� Originertificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TP ❑ Resolution of tal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate E] 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: Un7 Copies of all documents ist in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Not Corporate/Partnership Papers'o Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter'^ 6'L s� Deferred Monumentation Lee Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Pla[ ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑��f Easement re: Covenant re: '(CD Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements /CS/FIRF/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &Err /CATV) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments Agreement re: �'D I�1P2,NB Improvements E] Pvt. Rd. Main[ 11 �A 7 - -- Improvement Plan 2 N� Sub Ian ChangUAs -Built Proposed ❑ Con-ected ❑ App(ved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blue[ ine/Red- lined Checkprint`g r Original Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) (Vote: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Road/ Drainage /Water /Sewer/rraiVPark/Facility) Grading Pla, '41f �llhusinaFfPtais Change/As -built Proposed C3 arre ted ❑ Approved ❑ cc Checkprint)Er— Original Blueline/Red- lined' Hydraulic Calculations/Map Cost Estimate ❑ Sos Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade Structural Calculations❑ ( Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion ControVPlanting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Requirements ❑ Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review ❑ Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: r—pf&l L� (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Intra Trans.doc /02.11 99 1 aft JINEERING SERVICES DEPARTt* .-NT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: O �P DATE: Regarding (Finance NumEPOS /FEE (Finance Number DEPOSIT/ FEE " (Finance Number EPOS /FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map dFinal p Sit bmitta mended/Correctd Proposed ❑ Cotrec'ad Approv teroffice Memo• ❑ 1) Response to Plancheck / /.{ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ��7 D0 Blueline/Red -lind Z Checkprint Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Respid on of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report [0' Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents Uded in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations [0A7- Keference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application 4) Street Nam C sage A plication,❑ S) Other % ' �J.1 6) Copies to: Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: ( S TFIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &ErF/CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ etch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ PvL Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement n T ubmitt Ian Change/As -Built Proposed [ ❑ Appro Mfg. Specs. ❑ Bluelme/Red -lined Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate (� (Pub ind/Dram:age/W Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. acIIIty) Grading Plan �Subm Chan e/ Propos d ❑ Corrected cc • [� f Blueline/Red -lined El' Checkprinl Lr Origin Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate EJ Soil Report Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Prel' /Prec' }�jJ Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Contro lanting rogation) As Per... Submittal ents [2 Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Approval E] Signature: Information ❑ U__se // 0, ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARMntre Trnns.doc102.11.99 I of I PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: ENGINEERING DEPT. CITY OF ENCINITAS WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: M Attached ❑ Under separate cover via 1 5 -:�Lt Date: September 12, 2000 Job No. PE 786 Attn: Tamera O'Neal Re: TM98 -272 BENAMEL SILVERWOOD THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 3R 1) S 0/3,,,I 17r,96 Copies Date No. Description ❑ As requested I RESOLUTION, NEW PR., OLD P.R. , PROOF OF PROCUREMENT OF 3.0 ACRES BIO SPACE I REVISED TAPES 3 , SET OF VESTING DOC'S , EASEMENT DOC'S, 1 MONUMENT DEFERRAL LETTER 1 REVISED NAD 83 TAPES AND NAD 83 DISK (ACAD 14 PLAN VIEW) 1 ENG. AND PLANNING 1 BL'S I ENG. 2 BL'S 2 REVISED 3'S FOR SUBMITTAL THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ® For review and comment REMARKS: COVENANTS TO BE SUBMITTAL AT FINAL, OMWD MEMO APPROVAL D SIGNED JGINEERING SERVICES DEPAROENT Capital lrnprovemenl Projects District Support services Feld Operations Subdvlslon Engineering Traffic Engineering INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (C1P) L] Subdivision Engineering (SE) [� Traffic Engineering (TE) District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) E Field Operations (FO) ? —T Community Development- Current Planning O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: C/uv JCS /� San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning Community Services — Parks & Beaches DATE: Q Regarding (Finance Number o/'4-';F? DEPOSI EE TPP _R: (Finance Number _) DEPOSI (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map E] Final Map Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: (Staff/ Consul tant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/ W a ter /Sewer/TrailfPark/Facility) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised — — Grad e P ' proved Copy / Original New Plan Change Description: LO /G OIJ IU O (Mass/Rough/Prelim inary/Precise) (Erosion Con lantin & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry � Our Approval For your... Correction .'�CComment Signature gInformation F] Uses El Please return "'�'I S Please call: z 3 / if necessary Originator: Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /AkMntcr_Trans.docJ03.02.99 I of I . GINEERING SERVICES DEPART -. -, SNT Coplld Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ff Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (a t) ❑ Field Opeerrations (FO) ❑ _ ATTENTION:Q DATE: /� Regarding (Finance Numbe EPOS[ /FEE (�/ UM[JP /Iv�IIV� R: Z - Z Z (Finance Number W D SIT/FEE (Finance Number EPOS )UFEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map Final lyyap ❑ j Submi ended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corr Approv teroffice Memo* ❑ 1) Response to Plancheck4 / 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit v Blueline/Red -lined �Checkprint Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TlAfrPMEIResodfion of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application 4) Street N71 ge A plicatio ❑ Preliminary Title Report Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other r JD. r �► 6) Copies to: Copies of all documents 1' d in preliminary title reportfVesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations eference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monamentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ t (C S/ FIRF/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G&EfF /CATV) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ etch (if needed) / Description: Agreement re: ❑ lmprovements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Main ❑ ❑ 'T lmprovement an ubmitta Ian Change/As -Built Proposed [FCoaecfEB ❑ Appro Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined E3 Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Pub ' ivate) oad/Drainage/Wate ew iU k/Facility) Grading Plan Submi Change✓ wilt =" Proposed ❑ Corrected pproved cc • [f f Blueline/Red -lined o' Che print Origin Hydraulic Calculations/Map Cost Estimate oil Report Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/PreI' reci Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Contr laming rrigation) As Per... Submittal R ements [� Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature Information ❑ -- ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Intm Trans.dod02.11.99 I of I PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: City of Encinitas Engineering Department WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: 0 Attached ❑ Under separate cover THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Date: Job No. 9/14/2000 PE 786F Attn: Tamara O'Neal Re: Adam's Run (TPM 98 -272 Grading Plan & Sewer Plan (3 Plan Check) Copies Date No. Description 1 As requested ❑ Plancheck #'s I and 2 comments 2 Modified Grading Plan 2 Modified Sewer Plan 2 Modified Grading Cost Estimate 2 Sewer Cost Estimate 2 Updated Geotechnical Report 2 Modified Hydrology Report 2 Updated Title Report THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: E For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment REMARKS: S*ed: Edward rdvlycm J1. PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: ENGINEERING DEPT. CITY OF ENCINITAS WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: Attached ❑ Under separate cover SEP 15 2G1� I. Date: September 12, 2000 Job No. PE 786 Attn: Tamera O'Neal Re: TM98 -272 BENAMEL SILVERWOOD 1 RESOLUTION, NEW PR., OLD P.R., PROOF OF PROCUREMENT OF 3.0 ACRES BIO SPACE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 3R b 6 013 1-N 17- 7-,46 Copies Date No. Description 1 RESOLUTION, NEW PR., OLD P.R., PROOF OF PROCUREMENT OF 3.0 ACRES BIO SPACE 1 REVISED TAPES 3 , SET OF VESTING DOC'S , EASEMENT DOC'S, 1 MONUMENT DEFERRAL LETTER 1 REVISED NAD 83 TAPES AND NAD 83 DISK (ACAD 14 PLAN VIEW) 1 ENG. AND PLANNING 1 BL'S 1 ENG. 2 BL'S 2 REVISED 3"'S FOR SUBMITTAL THESE ARE TRANSMITTED ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ® For review and comment REMARKS: COVENANTS TO BE SUBMITTAL AT FINAL, OMWD MEMO APPROVAL IN "V,, SIGNED E. INEERING SERVICES DEPARTA. T Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (#1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ 1��A^y / ATTENTION: /!�'Y/'% a 7 DATE: Regarding (Finance Numbe r. ),pEPOSIT EE UP / y ZAZ (Finance Number 71� DEPO =7 (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: P5 Final Parcel Map Final p ❑ mttt Amended/Corrected Proposed F] Correcte Approved ffice Memo' ❑ Comments /Additional Space for Document 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline /Red -lined Checkprint ©' Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report(Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Addoo nral� Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ A JT �K� /,(G' Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • ATV) Sketch (if needed) / Description: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑a Improvements L] Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate I Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. Publi vate oad Drainage Water /Sew r/TraiUP acility) Grading Plan �f ubmitt? Ian Change /As -built cc Proposed Correcte Ap ' ❑ BlueUe/Red -lined 0 Chec rut Orig 1 El Hydraulic Calculations/Map Cost Estimate Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ iminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. Erosion Contr lanting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Re ements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review [r] Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SUARRAntra Trans.dod02.11.99 1 of 1 )f PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: PLANNING DEPT. CITY OF ENCINITAS WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: Attached ❑ ❑ Under separate cover THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Date: 6 -12 -2000 Job No. PE 786 Attn: JEFF GARAMI Re: BENAMEL BLUE LINES OF 2 No SUBMITTAL BENAMEL PARCEL MAP Copies Date No. Description 3 BLUE LINES OF 2 No SUBMITTAL BENAMEL PARCEL MAP THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: �77/I or approval O '6" F1 For your use ❑ As requested .� � 3 ❑ For review and comment REMARKS: 2 Nv 560^ 71'4(- 1019 Zx�/(/- Si ed DAN CO RF -, /Z� EN EERING SERVICES DEPARTML PLANCHECK CONSULTANT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: SUBDIVISON ENGINEERING DIVISION; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SECTION T JOHN POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. O 175 CALLE MAGDALENA, SUITE 101 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 I ATTENTION: Gt+Nto«/L %Ito` DATE: I /v O O Regarding (Finance NumberAR77 (t )DEPOSIT /MIN/DR: 98 - .2 r (Finance Number 6277 -0M )DEPOSIT ) «r T�roDar) es or� ✓Hz�«w1, Q (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE APN: 7L rl — 4f l ^D S Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document S ✓ Final Parcel Map J�j Final Map ❑ i 49MR350YAmended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed Z] Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ® Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ® Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ® Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other O Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title repoWVesting Deed ® 6) Copies to I t Traverse Calculations (g) Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter" ❑ DT 0; a e+ 5i 14 —Gr o� r erev.c Deferred Monumentation Letter ® Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • C SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G&E/r /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer El Park L1 Impact Fees El Sketc t (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/Tmii/Park/Facility) Grading Plan ® s ✓ Q�UPlan Change/As -built Proposed ® Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc' Blueline/Red -lined Q Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ® Cost Estimate ® Soil Report Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Massa of Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ston o lanting & Irrigation) Pursuant to the tarns of our contract with your firm, we request professional plan check services for the aforementioned plans and/or supporting documentation. If you , or need additional information, please give us a call at (760) 633 -2776. have any comments, Is lion r 90 S S r r— y� Fmq f Originator: N +ry Oki 0 Position: • e, t� , 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG1ARR/Pln_Cons.dod02.11.99 I of I Eli JEERING SERVICES DEPARM INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Semces Feld Operations Subdivislon Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ® Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development- Current Planning O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: c San Dieeuito Water District- Eneineerine & Plannina 61/00 Community Services - Parks & Beaches DATE: Regarding (Finance Number 6;(77 - 6D� ) DEPOSIT(O ��TM/MUP�(nM�.�/DR:._ 15- 2, lZ2-. .9A (Finance Number 4 �— - t �. `� DEPOSTI�E " die, '4 rro,I-ril et1 Fatz, ,, Iex Jn Ilt (Finance Number - _� DEPOSIT/FEE APN: ;2,4 Y- N5/- O S Transmitted as following: Other Application: + Final Parcel Map ® Final Map ❑ ' S Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / t9or Revised o��nalSpace for Document: C InJents/Additi{{ sD KTo OT; e- T & L S S1 OK rG ZyMiy,/Ly -A —t.-He. een.J • ( Staff / Consul tent /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage (Water /Sewer/Trai VPark/Faci I ity) - Intermediate Description: Grading Plan ® S ChFck Plan Change Description: Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / or Revised (Mas ou liminary/Pmcise) rosion Co lanting alt Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval Eq For your... Correction ❑ Comment ® Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return +��'n 2 Please call: '�7?' X13 if necessary Originator: Copies to: e- 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG/ARWlrster_Ts .da103.02.99 I of 1 EA&EERING SERVICES DEPAR TM, Capitol Improvement Protects District Support Services Field Operolims Subdivision Engines" Truffic "neering INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ® Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Develooment- Current Planning O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: aye /Vloo' °c_ San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning Community Services — Parks & Beaches DATE: 11 Zo O Regarding (Finance Number 62,!7 - 6 9) DEPOSIT(O 3hM/MUPV1N/DR 177 - 2, 21 (Finance Number' %? - ft IA DEPOSIT (0 Yro,ie�i/es� (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN y5/— OS Transmitted as following: / Final Parcel Map ® Final Map E] 5 + V Cheep Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / t9or Revised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff/ ConsultanttCD /FimJSDWD /OMWD/L,CWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Mvate) ( Road /Drainage) W ater /Sewer/Traii/Park/Facility) intermediate Description: Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised 5 Grading Pfau � � _ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original /e or Revised Plan Change Description: (Mas ou liminary/Precise) tosion Co hating & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval El For your... Correction ❑ Comment ® Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return r.'Z' n 2 Wks Please call: 9, i-el "!> if necessary Originator. 8 14- K Ao I I Copies to: e_ 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARMnter Trans.doc/03.02.99 I of 1 I PE. PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 To: City of Encinitas N Attached ❑ Under separate cover via THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Date: 1/22/02 Job No. 786f Attn: Paul Hartman Re: Adams Run SWPPP Copies Date No. Description 1 1/15/02 9 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan for Adams Run ��: f7l.Yll.•1[��g9�[cIS11t11Y11�71 ❑ For approval ❑ For your use As requested ❑ For review and comment ,zg- - Signed STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN for Adams Run Prepared for: City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, Ca 92024 Resident Engineer: Leroy Bodas Telephone: 760 -633 -2770 Submitted by: Adams Run L.P. P.O. Box 270649 San Diego, CA 92198 Telephone: 858 -613 -2990 John Silverwood Project Sile Address Fortuna Ranch Road Encinitas, CA 92024 Telephone: 858 -613 -2990 Contractor's li'ater Pollution Control Manager Joe Walsh Telephone: 760419 -2090 .5 "PP Prepared bt : Pasco Engineering 535 N. Coast Highway 10,1 Suite F Solana Beach, California 92075 Telephone: 858 - 259 -8212 Mike Smith/ Steve Jones SWPPP Preparation Date January 15th 2002 PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 LIE= (DIF T���5ASUff TITAL To: State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Quality P O Box 1977 Sacramento, CA 95812 WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: Attached LI Under separate cover via. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Date Januan . 7 2002 Job No. 786 Attn: Storm Water Section Re: Notice of Intent for SWPPP Copies Date No. Description Notice of Intent Application. Vicinity Map, Site Map 1 In102 5 1 Check # 1139 for $250.00 from Adams Rana L.P. for application fee THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ❑ For approval For your use As requested ❑ For review and comment Steve Jones Engineer Assistant a- OISTATUS(SEE MARK ONLY ONE ITEN INSTRUCTION IL PROPERTY OWNER Sete Wfett Reeourees Caned Board NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (WO ORDER No. 99-08 -OWO) 1. 0 New Construction 2. n Chance of Information for WDID# V ��rrr Nam. Contact Person Contact Person Adams Run, L.P. Adam's Run, L . P John Silverwood Mailing Address idle P.O. Box 270649 Mailing Address Owner City Slat Zip (as in III. above) Phone San Diego CA 92198 State ( 858) 613 -- 2990 III. DEVELOPE RICO NTRACTOR INFORMATION Developer,Contractor Contact Person Adams Run, L.P. John Silverwood Mailing Address Title P.O. Box 270649 President City Slat Zip Phone San Diego CA 1 92198 1 ( 858) 613 -- 2990 Joe Walsh Adam's Run Physical Addiess/Location I- 2titude Longitude County Fortuna Ranch Road 33 o 117 San Diego City (or nearest City) Zip Site Phone Number Emergency Phone Number Encinitas CA ( 858) 613 -- 2990 ( 858) 613 -- 2990 A. Total size of construction site area C. Percent of site imperviousness (including rooftops). 10.2 Acres O Tract Numbers). _ Before Construction: 0.5 % B. Total area to be disturbed. 5,0 Acres (% of total _50) After Construction: 10 % E. kfle Post Marker: E Is the construction site part of a larger common plan of development or sale? G. Name of plan or developments Adams Run YES NO J. Projected construction dales: H. Construction commencement date: _02/08_1_2001_ Complete grading: _10_/_15_! O1_ Complete project: _12_/_1 1_01_ I. % of she to be mass graded: 6.0 K. Type of Construction (Check all that apply): 1. Residential 2. ❑ Commercial 1 ❑ Industrial 4. ❑ Reconstruction 5. ❑ Tiansponation 6. ❑ Utility Description: 7. ❑ Other (Please List) V. BILLING INFORMATION SEND BILL TO Name Contact Person OWNER Adam's Run, L . P John Silverwood (as in II. above) ❑ Mailing Address Phone/Fax DEVELOPER P.O. Box 270649 ( 858) 613 -- 2990 (as in III. above) .� City State Zip OTHER San Diego CA 92198 (enter information at right) REGULATORY STATUS A. Has a local agency approved a required ermionlsedur ent control plan ?. _...... _. .......__ ___.. .. _... _. 0 YES ❑ NO Does the ,rmumisedur e.t control plan address construction activdies such as infrastructure and struaures� __.__. ...._._. __. YES ❑ NO Name of local agency. City of Encinitas Phone: ( 760) 633 — 2730 B . Is this project or any part thereof, subject to conditions imposed under a CWA Section 404 perms of 401 Water Quality Caniricalion ?........ ❑ YES NO a Yes. provide details' fit. KtUtIVINIi WAI tK A. Does the storm water ru site discharge to (Check all that 1. Indirectly to waters of the U.S. 2. ❑ Storm drain system - Enter owner's name: 3. ❑ Directly to waters of U.S. (e.g. , river, lake, creek, stream, bay, ocean, etc.) B. Name of receiving water (river, lake, creek, stream, bay, ocean) 1111. IMrLtmtN I A I IUN Vr iyr UCJ rGRmnl mc:. A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ❑ A SWPPP has been prepared for this facility and is available for review. Date Prepared. 1 Date Amended'. 1 1 E A SWPPP will be prepared and ready for review by (enter date). _1115102_ rl A tentative schedule has been included in the SWPPP for activities such as grading street construction, home construction, etc. . A monitoring and maintenance schedule has been developed that includes inspection of the construction BMPs before anticipated storm events and after actual stone events and is available for review. If checked above: A qualified person has been assigned respmsibility for pre -slam and post -storm BAP inspections to identify effectiveness and necessary repairs or design changes _.........._ ............................................. ............................... 0 YES ❑ NO Name: Joe Walsh Pharr: (858) 613 -2990 A qualified person has been assigned responsibility to ensure full compliance with the Pennd. and to implement all elemenfs of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan including. 1. Preparing an annual oomplianoeevaluation ____.. _ ___. ...__... ...__.. __._. ❑ YES ■NO Name. Phone. ( — 2. Eliminating all unauthorized discharges ...__ .. ......... .. ._....__.. ......... ............. ..._._.. .._..._.■YES 0 N X. VICINITY MAP AND FEE (must show site location in relation to nearest named streets, intersections. etc.) Have you included a vicinity map with this submittal? ._._._ ..... _......_... _.. ..... YES NO Have you included payment of the annual fee vAh this sahmittai? _.. _. _.._..__ __... . YES ❑ NO FICATIONS "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction and supervision In accordance wan a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine or imprisonment In addition, I certify that the provisions of the permit, including the development and implementation of a Stone Water Pollution Prevention Plan and a Monitoring Program Plan will be complied with." Anted Name: 5 oAQs ..)nature: _ Date: Title: 5,r69inl!/ �sSY%a STATUS ITEM 1. NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (WO ORDER No. 930&DWQ) :a17 San Diego ncvv�� n�ernnemnwrrrl,o IYCl104eATrlY Cosmic C. Conte CA 1 921$7 I ( 858) 613 -- 2990 ]evebPer/Lontractor ••••••••—•— .— ._- ._-- ._- - - - --_ Benam@l Development Corp Goofed Perron_— John Silverwood �yy� Aamese P.O. Box 270649 Tole President CRY _ San Diego Std CA Zip 92198 Phorat { 858 813 -- 2990 J Adam's Joe Walsh W PAdreasfLocdlon a I. Longitude county San Diego Fortuna Ranch Road _33_ ° 117_' SMSPan Namur ErnmVen YPhone Nurnbw c ty (a ne rwl C+ry) Encinitas CA ( IN%) 6113— 2980 I ( 858) 613— 2900 A Total eli& d owtshugion slle area: C. Pen=t d site impervious (tudwrittg r(KOOPS): 1101 Acorn D. Trod Ntmbaos): Bs(ore Cpwhwion: Ob % B. Total area to be dislutbed: 5.0 Acres (% of total 50_J After Conshuceon: - 10 % E Mile Poll Marker — F. Is the cot ejuc lm! pwt d a MrW tamtm phan of develcpnlyd or eoteY G. Nrns of plan or ds+ebpnrnt'. M Cm.rudon eon mm wnwd dots: _02J_MJ—,2007- Ctsrpels PWnY: _70 / 16J ot_ cuwldde P.$).ra: _17 r >_r 01_ of rote b be nres graded: _6.0_ K ijp d Cottmndiorr (CherY es tnet ePWY)� I. M ftwMa " 2. ❑ Cwwmtdd & ❑ W*Ad d 4. ❑ Recarstnraion 5. ❑ TtwPar p 6. ❑ UWft De npbon: 7.❑ Olher(Please UA) J. BILLING INFORMATION OWNER (ee Id 11. above) DEVELOPER 0. in III. above) ❑ OTHER *w inlomt tiw at right) John Sitverwood; Benamal Development Corp. ua: P.O. Box 270649 San Diego John Silvelwood ( 858) 613 — 2990 CA 192198 Has a local agency approved a required ercelorv'sedfinenl cn0ol plan?. .................. -- ......... --- . ......................................... .. ....... . N YES ❑ N.0 Does the erosiaJxWirtleM coned plan address coratnbution activities such as arhaMnx:Nre and structures? ....... ..._.._ ....... .._...--- .... ■ YES ❑ NO ,me of local agency: City of Encinitas _ _ Phone: ! lea ) . 899 -2730 a. it aft pofaetnnrllPmtNmeaf, euljedbaala4einpord wma r• CWA season AOS perrrr1 of 401 WeerysyCa dWaaaayr ...... __._..._........ ❑ Yee NO It yes, provtls cl lark: 'R. RECEIVING WATER INFORMATION A. Does the dorm water runoff from the construction sae discharge to (Check all that apply): 0 buorwtly to waters of the U.S. 1 ❑ Storm drain system - Enter owner's name: 7. ❑ Directly to waters of U.S. (64, river, face, rJwlf, wwsste, sal. oow, MW a. Name of receiving aystar: (river, lake, !reel(, stream, sty, *am): /11111. IMPLEMENTATION OF NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENI ye 1:1 0 A SVVPPP lus been prepared fur this lauldy and Is dvddeble fof leylew. Date Prepared. r 1 A SWPPP will be prepared and ready for review by (enter date): A road in the SWPPP for actlwbe5 Date Amended. / rml A moneodne and meheenmos schedule has been developed that iriekrdee hopeGNrr of the onnslmcnon BMPs before anficipaled shun events and allot actual storm events and Is available for review. N checked above: A qualified person has bean oeaipw raepor en — for psalo m and polalonm 111111P, to idedify, effectiveness and necessary repave a design drarge ............................................_._.._........... ......................-- ....... 0 YES []No Name. Joe Walsch Phone: (858) 813 -2990 A gwiieed pwaon hr been aswgned b were fur ownpl aroe velh the Perm4, and b vnfft enl all elan eft a the Slam WaW Pokman Prevwr,Wn Pion Mcheang: 1 Prenadrm an anneal comohance rv- krallm _... ........ . _.__........__. _.. _... __.__. ❑YES ONO Name: Phone: ( ) 2. Eliminating all awulhodzed discharges, .... ..... .............................. ........... ...._ .... _ .... -_..-... ........................ ............................. 0 YES ❑ NO IX. VICINITY MAP AND FEE (must show site lone sion in relation to nesies[ nameo streets, aAwwcawW, sac. Neva you included a vidnily rnrao with the nAmaiol7 .............. .................. YES FI NO I a Nana you i,k i d payrow* d the annual nee wAh this subnrmali_ ......................... ... ... ..... __-- ..... .......... ............................. YES ❑ NO A. I.LK! lrUUA 11UNZ I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction and supervision in accordance with e system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible !or gathering the information, the information submitted Is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine or imprisonment In addition, 1 certify that the provisions of the permit, including the development and implementation of a Stomp Water Pollution Prevention Plan and a Monitoring Program Plan will be complied with /� / - � — d7 Contents Section 100 SWPPP Certifications and Approval ........................... ..........................100 -1 100.1 Initial SWPPP Certification ................... _ .... I ... I... .................................. 100 -1 100.2 SWPPP Approval ................................... ............................... ..........................100 -1 1003 Annual Compliance Certification ........... ............................... ..........................100 -2 Section 200 SWPPP Amendments .................... ............................... ..........................200 -1 200.1 SWPPP Amendment Certification and Approval ................... ..........................200 -1 200.2 Amendment Log .................................... ............................... ..........................200 -3 Section 300 Introduction and Project Description .......................... ..........................300 -1 300.1 Introduction and Project Description ...... ............................... ..........................300 -1 300.2 Unique Site Features .............................. ............................... ..........................300 -1 300.3 Construction Site Estimates .................... ............................... ..........................300 -1 300.4 Project Schedule/Water Pollution Control Schedule .............. ..........................300 -1 300.5 Contact Information/List of Responsible Parties .................... ..........................300 -3 Section 400 References ..................................... ............................... ..........................400 -1 Section 500 Body of SWPPP ............................. ............................... ..........................500 -1 500.1 Objectives ............................................. ............................... ...........................500 -1 500.2 Vicinity Map .............................. ..................................................................... 500 -1 500.3 Pollutant Source Identification and BMP Selection ............... ..........................500 -1 500.3.1 Inventory of Materials and Activities that May Pollute Storm Water.. 500-1 500.3.2 Existing (pre - construction) Control Measures .......... ..........................500 -2 500.3.3 Nature of Fill Material and Existing Data Describing the Soil ............ 500 -3 500.3.4 Soil Stabilization (Erosion Control ) ......................... ..........................500 -3 500.3.5 Sediment Control.. ............................................................................. 500-5 500.3.6 Tracking Control .................... _............................. .......................... 500 -6 500.3.7 Wind Erosion Control ............................ ............................................ 500 -7 500.3.8 Non -Storm Water Control ........ ............................... ..........................500 -7 500.3.9 Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control .........................500 -9 500.4 Water Pollution Control Drawings (WPCDs) ...................... ..........................500 -11 500.5 Construction BMP Maintenance, Inspection and Repair ................ ................ 500 -11 500.6 Post - Construction Storm Water Management ....................... .........................500 -12 500.6.1 Post - Construction Control Practices ........................ .........................500 -12 500.6.2 Operation/Maintenance after Project Completion .... .........................500 -12 500.7 Training ................................................ ............................... .........................500 -12 500.8 List of Subcontractors ... ................................................................................ 500 -13 500.9 Other Plans/Permits ............................ ............................... ........................... 500 -13 Section 600 Monitoring Program and Reports ................................................ .......... 600 -1 Pasco Engineering Contents k %S"d" FILE9V9APPR9A4*41 AJ P 78 January ink 2M! 600.1 Site Inspections .. ......................................................................................... ..600-1 600.2 Discharge Reporting .............................. ............................... ..........................600 -1 600.3 Record Keeping and Reports .................. ............................... ..........................600 -2 SWPPP Attachments AttachmentA ...................................................................... ............................... Vicinity Map Attachment B ... .. ... ......... ... _ .............................. Water Pollution Control Drawings Attachment C ....................... ............................BMP Consideration Checklist & BMP Details Attachment D ... Program for Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair of Construction Site BMPs Attachment E ............................. Storm Water Quality Construction Site Inspection Checklist Attachment F ....................................... ............................... Trained Contractor Personnel Log Attachment G ........ ............................... ..................Subcontractor Notification Letter and Log Attachment H ............................. ..........................SWPPP and Monitoring Program Checklist Attachment I ............................ ............................... Annual Certification of Compliance Form Attachment J ................ ..........................Notice of Discharge, Written Notice or Order AttachmentK ................... ............................... ......................Hydrology Report Attachment L ............................................ ...................Geotechnical Investigation Pasco Engineering Contents 1GS MOeFILESI PPSWPPPOARP 788 ad Page it January 16th 2002 Section 100 SWPPP Certifications and Approval 100.1 Initial SWPPP Certification Project Name. Adams Run " I certify under a penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information submitted is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." ontractor's Signature Joe Walsh Contractor's Name and Title Date sse- GI's zqq 0 Telephone Number Pasco Engineering Section 100 1�1 enae EaEs%svaaPOWPPPLWN lee aoc Page 100-1 January 15th 2002 100.2 SWPPP Approval Resident Engineer's Approval of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Project Name: Adams Run "I certify under a penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information submitted is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." RE's Signature ayne A. Pasco RE's Name � /Z1 /a 2 Date 858- 259 -8212 RE's Telephone Number Pasm Engineering Section 100 AS .e FILESI� 786 as Page 100 -1 Janwry pith 2002 100.3 Annual Compliance Certification By June 15 of each year, the contractor shall submit an Annual Certification of Compliance to the Resident Engineer (RE) stating compliance with the terms and conditions of the Permits and the SWPPP. The Annual Certification of Compliance Form and RE Approval Form are included in Attachment M. Completed Annual Certifications of Compliance and Approvals can be found in the following pages. Pasco Engineering Section 100 1lSeneNOe FILESSWPPPeNPPP%9NPPP 788 C¢ Page 100-2 January 16th 2002 Section 200 SWPPP Amendments 200.1 SWPPP Amendment Certification and Approval This SWPPP shall be amended: • Whenever there is a change in construction or operations which may affect the discharge of pollutants to surface waters, groundwater(s), or a municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4); or • If any condition of the Permits is violated or the general objective of reducing or eliminating pollutants in storm water discharges has not been achieved. If the RWQCB determines that a Permit violation has occurred, the SWPPP shall be amended and implemented within 14- calendar days after notification by the RWQCB; • Annually, prior to the defined rainy season, when required by the project's Special Provisions; and • When deemed necessary by the RE The amendments for this SWPPP, along with the Contractor's Certification and the RE's approval, can be found in the following pages. Amendments are listed in the Amendment Log in section 200.2 Pasco Engineering Section 200 %�S.nioe c1Less•maw5vwck9rvwa ]ae aoc Page 200 -1 January 16th 2002 SWPPP Amendment No. Project Name: Adams Run To Be Completed by Contractor "I certify under a penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information submitted is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." ontractor's Signature Joe Walsh Contractor's Name and Title �— ate 8sit Ct3 -2�t4o Telephone Number Resident Engineer's Approval of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Amendment "I certify under a penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information submitted is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of tine and imprisonment for knowing violations." RE's Signature RE's Telephone Number Pasco Engineering Sedan 200 k� OFuES%SWa �a yea eoc Page 200 -2 January 15th 2002 200.2 Amendment Log Project Name: Adams Run Amendment Date Brief Description of Amendment Prepared By No. Pasco Engineering Section 200 k�lw'�09 FiLES%9WPI'M�,Fifl Page 200 -3 January 16th 2002 Section 300 Introduction and Project Description 300.1 Introduction and Project Description The construction project is located in San Diego County, in Olivenhain, California on Fortuna Ranch Road Lone. The purpose of the Adams Run project is to provide a subdivision of 4 lots for future single family developments. The project will require a private road from Fortuna Ranch Road to be constructed in order to access the subdivision. The private road will dead end into a hammer head turn around. Drainage channels, berms, ditches and inlets will be required to control storm runoff. Proposed sewer, water and utilities will be required and serve the new subdivision. Each individual lot will be graded to accommodate building pads. 300.2 Unique Site Features 300.3 Construction Site Estimates The following are estimates of the construction site: Construction site area Percentage impervious area before construction Runoff coefficient before construction Percentage impervious area after construction Runoff coefficient after construction Anticipated storm water flow on to the construction site (3) Hydrology report shown in Attachment K 10.2 Ac Sec Hydro report (3) % Sec Hydro repot (3) See Hydro report (3) % Sec Hydro report (3) See Hydro report (J) 300.4 Project Schedule/Water Pollution Control Schedule Estimate Construction Start: 02/07/01 Estimate Construction Finish: 12/1/01 Mobilization of equipment and materials to begin on 02/08/01 Install ESA fencing 02/07/01 Store temporary soil stabilization and temporary sediment control products beginning on 02/07/01 Install stabilized construction entrance on 02/08/01 Site preparation: Clearing and grubbing will occur from 02/08/01 Start implementation of temporary soil stabilization and sediment control BMPs on 02/08/01 (before rainy season starts). Continue to implement and maintain temporary BMPs throughout rainy season. Pasco Engineering WS.-,erObfi1m%SW MSWPPM\ PP 71%0 January 15th 2002 Section 300 Page 300 -1 Complete installation of temporary soil stabilization and sediment control BMPs on 02/18/01 Earthwork/roadway excavation to begin on 02/18/01 and continue through 3/23/01 Schedule soil stabilization subcontractors for application of temporary soil stabilization on disturbed areas and permanent erosion control on areas substantially complete: 3/19/01 Begin trenching, backfilling and compaction on 3/23/01 Implement final erosion control of substantially completed areas 5/17/01 Install temporary concrete washout 5/17/01 Completed final paving on 8/27/02 Continue to apply soil stabilization and sediment controls as needed during construction Remove concrete washout and restore area to original grade Schedule subcontractors for application of permanent erosion control 10 /l /O1 Start final stabilization, revegetation and landscape by 11/15/01 Project complete 12/1/01 Pasco Engineering 1kServertiob lilmlSW PPIS PPZWPPP 755 doc January 75th 2002 Section 300 Page 300 -2 300.5 Contact Information /List of Responsible Parties The Water Pollution Control Manager (WPCM) assigned to this project is: Joe Walsh/Benamel Deelopment Telephone: 760-419-2090/619-890-1600 16885 W. Bernardo Drive San Diego, California 92198 The WPCM shall have primary responsibility and significant authority for the implementation, maintenance, inspection and amendments to the approved SWPPP. Duties of the Contractor's WPCM include but are not limited to: ■ Ensuring full compliance with the SWPPP and the Permit ■ Implementing all elements of the SWPPP, including but not limited to: - Implementation of prompt and effective erosion and sediment control measures - Implementing all Non -storm water management, and materials and waste management activities such as: monitoring discharges (dewatering, diversion devices); general site clean- up; vehicle and equipment cleaning, fueling and maintenance; spill control; ensuring that no materials other than storm water are discharged in quantities which will have an adverse effect on receiving waters or storm drain systems; etc. • Pre -storm inspections • Post -storm inspections • Storm event inspections • Preparing annual compliance certification • Ensuring elimination of all unauthorized discharges • The Contractor's WPCM shall be assigned authority by the Contractor to mobilize crews in order to make immediate repairs to the control measures ■ Coordinate with the Engineer to assure all of the necessary corrections /repairs are made immediately, and that the project complies with the SWPPP, the Permit and approved plans at all times. Pasco Engineering %ServeNob fi1W%SW PMSW PP\SWPPP 7N Ux January 15th 2002 Section 300 Page 300 -3 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) Error! Reference source not found. Section 400 References The following documents are made a part of this SWPPP by reference: ■ Project plans and specifications No 5794 -G, dated 2/2/2000, prepared by Conway & Associates, Inc. ■ State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order No. 99 -06 -DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000003, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit, Statewide Storm Water Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for the State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans), July 1999. IN State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order No. 99 -08 -DWQ, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit No. CAS000002, Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activity, August 1999. is Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks, Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual, dated November 2000. ■ Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks, SWPPP/WPCP Preparation Manual, dated November 2000. in California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook, March 1993 Pasco Engineering WS.iU06 FILESV., GA1 PPGAPPP P7M doe January 16th 2002 Section 400 Page 400 -1 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Error! Reference source not found. Section 500 Body of SWPPP 500.1 Objectives This Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has four main objectives: in Identify all pollutant sources, including sources of sediment that may affect the quality of storm water discharges associated with construction activity (storm water discharges) from the construction site, and ■ Identify non -storm water discharges, and ■ Identify, construct, implement in accordance with a time schedule, and maintain Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce or eliminate pollutants in storm water discharges and authorized non -storm water discharges from the construction site during construction, and in Develop a maintenance schedule for BMPs installed during construction designed to reduce or eliminate pollutants after construction is completed (post- construction BMPs). This SWPPP conforms with the required elements of Permit No. CAS000003 and with the required elements of General Permit No. CAS000002 issued by the State of California, State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). This SWPPP will be modified and amended to reflect any changes in construction or operations that may affect the discharge of pollutants from the construction site to surface waters, groundwaters, or the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4). The SWPPP will also be amended if it is in violation of any condition of the Permit or has not achieved the general objective of reducing pollutants in storm water discharges. The SWPPP shall be readily available on -site for the duration of the project. 500.2 Vicinity Map The construction project vicinity map showing the project location, surface water boundaries, geographic features, construction site perimeter, and general topography, is located in Attachment A. The project's Title Sheet provides more detail regarding the project location and is also included in Attachment A- 500.3 Pollutant Source Identification and BMP Selection 500.3.1 Inventory of Materials and Activities that May Pollute Storm Water The following is a list of construction materials that will be used and activities that will be performed that will have the potential to contribute pollutants, other than sediment, to storm water Pasco Engineering ASen eJOB FILESlSWPPPISWPPP %SNPPP 788 tloc January 15th 2002 Section 500 Page 500 -1 runoff (control practices for each activity are identified in the Water Pollution Control Drawings (WPCDs) and/or in sections 500.3.4 through 500.3.9: Construction activities that have the potential to contribute sediment to storm water discharges include: • Clear and grub operations • Grading operations • Soil import operations • Utility excavation operations • Landscaping operations IA Go,,, Attachment C lists all Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are either minimum requirements or special contract requirements, and all BMPs selected by the Contractor for this project. Implementation and location of BMPs are shown on the WPCDs in Attachment B. Narrative descriptions of BMPs to be used during the project are listed by category in each of the following SWPPP sections. 500.3.2 Existing (pre - construction) Control Measures The following are existing (pre - construction) control measures encountered within the project site: Pasco Engineering Section 500 1t erverjobtilwlSWPPPISWPPPISWPPP786Eoc Page 500-2 January 15th 2002 500.3.3 Nature of Fill Material and Existing Data Describing the Soil Existing site features that, as a result of past usage, may contribute pollutants to storm water (e g , toxic materials that are known to have been treated, stored, disposed, spilled, or leaked onto the construction site) include: See Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Construction Tcsting & Engineering Inc Attachment L 500.3.4 Soil Stabilization (Erosion Control) Soil stabilization, also referred to as erosion control, consists of source control measures that are designed to prevent soil particles from detaching and becoming suspended in storm water runoff. Soil stabilization BMPs protect the soil surface by covering and/or binding soil particles. This project will incorporate minimum temporary soil stabilization requirements, temporary soil stabilization measures required by the contract documents, and other measures selected by the contractor. This project will utilize and implement the following principles for effective temporary and final soil stabilization during construction: 4 ) Preserve existing vegetation where required and when feasible. /2) Apply temporary soil stabilization (erosion control) to remaining active and non - active areas as required by the Construction Site BMPs Manual and the Special Provisions. Reapply as necessary to maintain effectiveness. ✓3) Implement temporary soil stabilization measures at regular intervals throughout the defined rainy season to achieve and maintain the contract's disturbed soil area requirements. When the project's Special Provisions require it, temporary soil stabilization will be implemented 20 days prior to the defined rainy season. Vl') Stabilize non - active areas within 14 days of cessation of construction activities. %0'0�) Control erosion in concentrated flow paths by applying erosion control blankets, erosion control seeding, and lining swales as required in the special provisions. L.A Seeding will be applied either during the defined seeding window, and/or to areas deemed substantially complete by the RE during the defined rainy season. &/7) At completion of construction, apply permanent erosion control to all remaining disturbed soil areas. Sufficient quantities of temporary soil stabilization materials will be maintained on -site to allow implementation in conformance with Caltrans requirements and described in this SWPPP. This Pasco Engineering RServMJ08 FILEb\SWPPPGWWPISWPPP 786 d¢ January 16th 2002 Section 500 Page Sni i_. includes implementation requirements for active areas, non - active areas, and areas that require deployment before the onset of rain. Implementation and locations of temporary soil stabilization BMPs are shown on the Water Pollution Control Drawings (WPCDs) in Attachment B and/or described in this section. The BMP Consideration Checklist in .Attachment C indicates the BMPs that will be implemented to control erosion on the construction site; these are: ■E SS -1, Scheduling (/i SS -2, Preservation of Existing Vegetation ✓ta SS -3, Hydraulic Mulch 't F ✓a SS-4 Hydroseeding 1 Implementation of Soil Stabilization BMPs BMPs will be deployed in a sequence to follow the progress of grading and construction. As the locations of soil disturbance change, erosion and sedimentation controls will be adjusted accordingly to control storm water runoff at the downgrade perimeter and drain inlets. BMPs will be mobilized as follows: Year- round.• The water pollution control manager will monitor weather using National Weather Service reports to track conditions and alert crews to the onset of rainfall events. Disturbed areas will be stabilized, as required by Tables 2 -2 and 2 -3 of the Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual, with temporary soil stabilization or with permanent erosion control as soon as possible after grading or construction is complete. During the rainy season: • Disturbed areas will be stabilized with temporary or permanent soil stabilization (erosion control) before rain events. • Disturbed areas that are substantially complete will be stabilized with permanent soil stabilization (erosion control) and vegetation (if within seeding window for seed establishment). • Prior to forecast storm events, temporary soil stabilization BMPs will be deployed and inspected. During the non -rainy season: The project schedule will sequence construction activities with the installation of both soil stabilization and sediment control measures. The construction schedule will be arranged as much as practicable to leave existing vegetation undisturbed until immediately prior to grading. Pasco Engineering I1S.n 08 FILES`S"PPSWPPPbWPPP 788 d. January 16th 2002 Section 500 Page 500.4 Hydraulic Mulch I1_vdraulic mulch will be primarily used throughout the disturbed areas adjacent to excavations and on shallow slopes surrounding the site. See the WPCDs in Attachment B of this SWPPP for locations where Hydraulic mulch will be used. 500.3.5 Sediment Control Sediment controls are structural measures that are intended to complement and enhance the selected soil stabilization (erosion control) measures. Sediment controls are designed to intercept and settle out soil particles that have been detached and transported by the force of water. This project will incorporate minimum temporary sediment control requirements, temporary sediment control measures required by the contract documents, and other measures selected by the contractor. The temporary sediment control BMPs selected are adequate to prevent a net increase of sediment in storm water discharge relative to pre - construction levels. Sufficient quantities of temporary sediment control materials will be maintained on -site throughout the duration of the project, to allow implementation of temporary sediment controls in the event of predicted rain, and for rapid response to failures or emergencies, in conformance with other Caltrans requirements and as described in this SWPPP. This includes implementation requirements for active areas and non - active areas before the onset of rain. Implementation and locations of temporary sediment control BMPs are shown on the Water Pollution Control Drawings (WPCDs) in Attachment B. The BMP Consideration Checklist in .Attachment C indicates all the BMPs that will be implemented to control sediment on the construction site; these are: ✓■ SC -1, Silt Fence ✓■ SC -6, Gravel Bag Berm/Check Dam vii SC -7, Street Sweeping and Vacuuming Implementation of Temporary Sediment Controls ■ Temporary sediment control BNIPs will be deployed according to the schedule shown in SWPPP section 300.4. During the rainy season, temporary sediment controls will be implemented at the draining perimeter of disturbed soil areas, at the toe of slopes, at storm drain inlets and at outfall areas at all times. Pasco Engineering kGS iV08 RLESISINPPPWWPPPIS P 788 Eac January 15th 2002 Section 500 Page 500 -5 ✓■ During the rainy season. temporary sediment controls will be implemented at the draining perimeter of disturbed soil areas, at the toe of slopes, at storm drain inlets and at outfall areas at all times. ✓■ During the non -rainy season, temporary sediment controls will be implemented at the draining perimeter of disturbed soil areas and at storm drain downstream from disturbed areas before rain events. ■ As shown on the WPCDs, silt fences will be deployed along the toe of exterior slopes to filter storm water runoff. • Storm drain inlet protection will be used at all operational internal inlets to the storm drain system during the rainy season as shown on the WPCDs. ii ■ During the non -rainy season, in the event of a predicted storm, the following temporary sediment control materials will be maintained on -site: silt fence materials, sandbags for linear barriers, fiber rolls 500.3.6 Tracking Control The following BMPs have been selected to reduce sediment tracking from the construction site onto private or public roads: ` at�■ SC -7, Street Sweeping and Vacuuming ■ TC -1, Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit BMPs to Reduce Sediment Tracking Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit ■ A stabilized construction entrance /exit will be constructed and maintained at construction site entrances and exits as shown on the site map. The site entrance /exit will be stabilized to reduce tracking of sediment as a result of construction traffic. The entrance will be designated and graded to prevent runoff from leaving the site. Stabilization material will be 6 -inch aggregate. The entrance will be flared where it meets the existing road to provide an adequate turning radius. Pasco Engineering Section 500 %IServeNoo M1lW�SWPPP%SO PP\WPPP 7M6 Page 500-6 January 15th 2002 Road Cleaning BMPs — Street Sweeping and Vacuuming Road sweeping and vacuuming will be occur during soil hauling and as necessary to keep street surfaces clear of soil and debris. Washing of sediment tracked onto streets into storm drains will not occur. 500.3.7 Wind Erosion Control The following BMPs have been selected to control dust from the construction site: ■ WE -l. Wind Erosion Control Dust Control Potable water will be applied to disturbed soil areas of the project site to control dust and maintain optimum moisture levels for compaction. The water will be applied using water trucks. As shown on the project schedule, project soils will be disturbed and exposed from approximately May 1 through December 15. Water applications will be concentrated during the late summer and early fall months and especially during the embankment construction operations scheduled for July. The total water to be applied is expected to be between 3,000 and 5,000 m3. V • BMP WE -1, Wind Erosion Control, and BMP NS -1, Water Conservation Practices, will be implemented to provide dust control and prevent discharges from dust control activities and water supply equipment. Water application rates will be minimized as necessary to prevent runoff and ponding and water equipment leaks will be repaired immediately. Va During windy conditions (forecast or actual wind conditions of approximately 25 mph or greater), dust control will be applied to DSAs, including haul roads to adequately control wind erosion. BMP WM -3, Stockpile Management, using silt fences and plastic covers will be implemented to prevent wind dispersal of sediment from stockpiles. 500.3.8 Non -Storm Water Control An inventory of construction activities and potential non -storm water discharges is provided in Section 5.3.1. The BMP Consideration Checklist in Attachment C and the following list indicates the BMPs that have been selected to control non -storm water pollution on the constriction site. Implementation and locations of some non -storm water control BMPs are shown on the Water Pollution Control Drawings (WPCDs) in Attachment B. A narrative description of each BMP follows Pasco Engineering RS."r'JOB FILESISN/PPPSNPPRSNPPP 713E d. January 16th 2002 Section 500 the BMPs that have been selected to control non -storm water pollution on the construction site. Implementation and locations of some non -storm water control BMPs are shown on the Water Pollution Control Drawings (WPCDs) in Attachment B. A narrative description of each BMP follows. NS -3, Paving and Grinding Operations NS-6, Illicit Connection/illegal Discharge Detection and Reporting Pam 0. NS -8, Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning NS -9, Vehicle and Equipment Fueling NS -10, Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance ■ WM -08, Concrete Waste Management Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge Detection and Reporting ■ The contractor will implement BMP NS -6, Illicit Connection/Illegal Discharge Detection and Reporting throughout the duration of the project. Paving Operations ■ The project will include placement of approximately 80,000 m2 of AC pavement. Paving locations and adjacent storm drain inlets are shown on WPCDs 2, 3, and 5. Paving operations will generally be conducted in August and September as shown on the project schedule in Section 300.4. BMP NS -3, Paving and Grinding Operations, will be implemented to prevent paving materials from being discharged off -site. Covers will be placed over each inlet adjacent to paving operations. The covers will consist of scrap carpeting placed over, and tucked under, each inlet grate. Following paving operations, the area will be swept, inlet covers will be removed, and the inlets will be inspected for paving materials. Vehicle and Equipment Operations Several types of vehicles and equipment will be used on -site throughout the project, including graders, scrapers, excavators, loaders, paving equipment, rollers, trucks and trailers, backhoes, forklifts, generators, compressors, and traffic control equipment. BMPs NS -9, Vehicle and Equipment Fueling, and NS -10, Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance will be utilized to prevent discharges of fuel and other vehicle fluids. Except for concrete washout, which is addressed in Section 500.3.8, vehicle cleaning will not be performed on -site. ■ A paved temporary fueling area will be constructed in the contractor's yard as shown on WPCD- 4. All self - propelled vehicles will be fueled off -site or at the temporary fueling area. Fuel trucks, each equipped with absorbent spill clean -up materials, will be used for all on -site fueling, whether at the temporary fueling area or for mobile fueling elsewhere on the site. Drip pans will be used for all mobile fueling. The fueling truck will be parked on the paved fueling area for overnight storage. Pasco Engineerina Section 500 \ \Semeryob filesrSYJPPP\SWPPPISWPPP 765 dm Page 500-8 January 15th 2002 ■ Drip pans or plastic sheeting will be used for all vehicle and equipment maintenance activities that involve grease, oil, solvents, or other vehicle fluids. ■ All vehicle maintenance and mobile fueling operations will be conducted at least 15 m away from operational inlets and drainage facilities and on a level graded area. Concrete Saw - cutting ■ BMP WM -08. Concrete Waste Management, will be implemented to contain and dispose of saw - cutting slurries. Sandbags will be used to contain the slurry and prevent discharges to the storm drain system. Once contained by the sandbag barrier, the slurry will be vacuumed and discharged to the concrete washout facility described above. Dried and cured concrete wastes will be disposed off -site during concrete washout maintenance activities. 500.3.9 Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control An inventory of construction activities, materials, and wastes is provided in Section 5.3.1. The BMP Consideration Checklist in Attachment C and the following list indicates the BMPs that have been selected to handle materials and control construction site wastes. A narrative description of each BMP follows. 0 WM -I, Material Delivery and Storage ■ WM -2, Material Use WM4, Spill Prevention and Control WM -5, Solid Waste Management ■ WM -08, Concrete Waste Management WM -09, Sanitary Septic Waste Management Material Delivery, Storage, and Use In general, BMPs WM -1 and WM -2 will be implemented to help prevent discharges of construction materials during delivery, storage, and use. The general material storage area will be located in the contractor's yard as shown on WPCD -4. A sandbag barrier (BMP SC -8) will be provided around the storage area to prevent run -on from adjacent areas. Two types of storage/containment facilities will be provided within the storage area to minimize storm water contact with construction materials: Pasco Engineering Section 500 Men"Ob MWSW PKS4 PP1$wPPP 186 d. Page 500 -9 Jemmy 15th 2002 Two water -tight shipping containers will be used to store hand tools, small parts, and most construction materials that can be carried by hand, such as paint cans, solvents and grease. A separate covered storagetcontainment facility will be constructed adjacent to the shipping containers to provide storage for larger items such as drums and items shipped or stored on pallets. The containment facility will consist of a 3 m by 6 m raised concrete pad with 120 mm curbed sides. A wood frame and corrugated tin roof will be constructed to protect the facility from sun and rain. Corrugated tin sides will be added when necessary to provide additional protection from wind and rain. The facility will provide about 2 m3(530 gal) of containment volume. Very large items, such as light standards, framing materials, and stockpiled lumber, will be stored in the open in the general storage area. Such materials will be elevated with wood blocks to minimize contact with run -on. ■ Aggregate and base materials will also be stockpiled in the general storage area and will be surrounded with additional sediment controls (i.e., SC -8, Sandbag Barrier). Plastic covers (SS -7, Geotcxtiles, Plastic Covers, & Erosion Control Blankets/Mats) will be provided if necessary for wind/dust control. Spill clean -up materials, material safety data sheets, a material inventory, and emergency contact numbers will be maintained and stored in the southern shipping container. Spill Prevention and Control BMP WM -4, Spill Prevention and Control, will be implemented to contain and clean -up spills gird prevent material discharges to the storm drain system. Spill prevention is also discussed above in Material Delivery, Storage, and below in the following waste management and equipment maintenance sections. Waste Management BMP WM -5, Solid Waste Management, and BMP WM -6, Hazardous Waste Management will be implemented to minimize storm water contact with waste materials and prevent waste discharges. Solid wastes will be loaded directly into trucks for off -site disposal. When on -site storage is necessary, solid wastes will be stored in watertight dumpsters in the general storage area of the contractors yard. Dumpster locations are shown on WPCD -4. AC and PCC rubble will be stockpiled in the general storage area and will be surrounded with sediment controls (SC- 8, Sandbag Barrier). Solid waste, including rubble stockpiles, will be removed and disposed off - site at least weekly. ABC Waste Disposal (License CA9999999) will provide solid waste disposal services. Hazardous wastes will be stored in the shipping containers or covered containment area discussed above for materials storage. Hazardous wastes will be appropriate and clearly marked containers and segregated from other non -waste materials. Pasco Engineering Section 500 %Sen k)09 RLESISNPPI L� PPPlSWPPP 786 .E¢ Page 500-10 January 15th 2002 ■ Contaminated soil management BMPs address the possibility of construction activity near contaminated soils. The construction site has no known history of contaminated soil or other impairments. However, employees will be instructed to recognize evidence of contaminated soil, such as buried debris, discolored soil, and unusual odors. Concrete Residuals and Washout Wastes This project includes placement of about 100 m3 of concrete in three separate pours, the largest pour being approximately 40 m3. The estimated maximum washout volume is 0.10 m3. Discharges will consist of rinse water and residual concrete (Portland cement, aggregates, admixture, and water). Estimated pour dates are shown on the project schedule in Section 300.4. Concrete pours will not be conducted during or immediately prior to rainfall events. 0BMP WM -8, Concrete Waste Management, will be implemented and a below grade concrete washout facility will be constructed and maintained at the contractor's yard as shown on WPCD- 4. All excess concrete and concrete washout slurries will be discharged to the washout facility for drying. The minimum -sized washout, at 3m x 3m x lm deep, will provide more than sufficient volume to contain concrete washout wastes and waste collected from concrete saw - cutting operations, discussed below. BMP maintenance, waste disposal, and BMP removal will be conducted as described in WM -08. Dried -off concrete will be used as fill material if permitted by the RE. Sanitary and Septic Wastes N� ■ The contractor will implement BMP WM -9, Sanitary and Septic Waste Management, and portable toilets will be located and maintained at the contractors yard for the duration of the project. Specific locations are shown on WPCD-4. Weekly maintenance will be provided each Wednesday by ABC Sanitation (license CAOQ45W) and wastes will be disposed off -site. The toilets will be located away from concentrated flow paths and traffic flow. 500.4 Water Pollution Control Drawings (WPCDs) I he Water Pollution Control Drawings can be found in Attachment B of the SWPPP. 500.5 Construction BMP Maintenance, Inspection and Repair A program for Maintenance, Inspection and Repair of BMPs is shown in Attachment D. Pasco Engineering Section 500 ASeneNob flm� PP%SWPPPV^WPPP 7Mdoc Page 500-11 January 15th 2002 500.6 Post - Construction Storm Water Management 500.6.1 Post- Construction Control Practices See Attachment B 500.6.2 Operation /Maintenance after Project Completion The post - construction BMPs that are described above will be funded and maintained as follows: The responsible party for the long -term maintenance of post - construction BMPs is private land owners of the subdivision 500.7 Training Section 300.5 shows the name of the contractor's Water Pollution Control Manager (WPCM). This person has received the following training: • Erosion Control BMPs • Sediment Control BMPs • Non -Storm Water BMPs • Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control BMPs • Emergency Procedures specific to the construction site storm water management If needed, formal training sessions will be selected from one of the following organizations: • City of Encinitas Storm Water Program • County of San Diego Storm Water Program • State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board • USEPA sponsored training • Recognized municipal stakeholder organizations throughout California • Professional organizations and societies in the building and construction field The training log showing formal and informal training of various personnel is shown in Attachment F. This SWPPP was prepared by Pasco Engineering, under the direction of Wayne A. Pasco a registered Engineer in the State of California. Pasco Engineering Section 500 1l"i"A" FILESS%WPPSINPPPeWP 7W tloc Page 500 -12 January 15th 2002 500.8 List of Subcontractors All contractors and subcontractors will be notified of the requirement for storm water management measures during the project. A list of contractors will be maintained and included in the SWPPP. If subcontractors change during the project, the list will be updated accordingly. The sub- contractor notification letter and log is included in the SWPPP as Attachment I 500.9 Other Plans/Permits Pasco Engineering Section 500 \llS eWOBFILE9L9e4PPPISWPPPV�P]66doc Page 500 -13 January 16th 2002 Section 600 Monitoring Program and Reports 600.1 Site Inspections The contractor will inspect the site prior to a forecast storm, after a rain event that causes runoff from the construction site, at 24 -hour intervals during extended rain events, and as specified in the project Special Provisions. The results of all inspections and assessments will be documented and copies of the completed inspection checklists will be maintained with the S WPPP. Site inspections conducted for monitoring purposes will be performed using the inspection checklist shown in Attachment E. The name(s) and contact number(s) of the assigned inspection personnel are listed below: Assigned inspector: Joe Walsh Contact phone: 858- 613 -2990 600.2 Discharge Reporting If a discharge occurs or if the project receives a written notice or order from any regulatory agency, the contractor will immediately notify the Engineer and will file a written report to the RE within 7 days of the discharge event, notice, or order. Corrective measures will be implemented immediately following the discharge, notice or order. A sample discharge form is provided in Attachment K. The report to the RE will contain the following items: ■ The date, time, location, nature of operation, and type of unauthorized discharge, including the cause or nature of the notice or order, ■ The control measures (BMPs) deployed before the discharge event, or prior to receiving notice or order, ■ The date of deployment and type of control measures (BMPs) deployed after the discharge event, or after receiving the notice or order, including additional measures installed or planned to reduce or prevent re- occurrence, and ■ An implementation and maintenance schedule for any affected BMPs Pasco Engineering ,Senejob 111e 1SWPPP \SWPPP�WPPP 7M dO January 15th 2002 Section 600 600 600.3 Record Keeping and Reports Records shall be retained for a minimum of three years for the following items: • Site inspections • Compliance certifications • Discharge reports • Approved S WPPP document and amendments Pmeo Engineedrig Section 600 �%S..q.b fl sSW MSVJ MSWPPP 7%d« 600 -2 January 15th 2002 Attachment A Vicinity Map Pasco Engineering Section 600 1�.&106 FILFSI PPPSWPPRSWPPP 766 cic Page 600-0 January 76th 2002 /� QT v VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE r N 7 W ti O = U (7 Q coi I y < �9 2F. LONE HILL ESTATES CANYON DE ORO DOVE COURT HOLLOW ROAD SITE--- 09T G N a O y 9 w TWIN < + fF o3� z OAKS 9 g1Cy � a Q VALLEY a Zp ROAD 90 q0 _ /� QT v VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE TPM 98-272 ADAM'S RUN M.T. SCALE #-M' -. �• ` '.' % �.• max_ , I j \,N\\ r Ilrrr IVY � i 61 1 •wj W [ IF Attachment B Water Pollution Control Drawings (WPCDs) See Inserted Drawing Pasco Engineering \ISe�NOe FILMSW PP%SWPPPIANPPP 7M d. January 16th 2002 Section 600 Page 600 -3 Attachment C BMP Consideration Checklist CONSTRUCTION SITE BMPs CONSIDERATION CHECKLIST The Contractor shall consider using all BMPs listed hereon. Those BMPs which are not included in the SW PPP shall be checked as "Not Used" with a brief statement describing why it is not being used. All selected BMPs shall be included in the Schedule of Values, except for those items shown on the plans and paid for as a separate item or work TEMPORARY • STABILIZATION BMP MINIMUM CHECK IF CHECK IF CHECK IF IF NOT USED, STATE BMP REQUIREMENT CONTRACT NOT NO' m REQUIREMENT USED USED REASON SS -1 Scheduling ► SS -2 Preservation of ► ❑ t—i►� ❑ Existing Vegetation SS -3 Hydraulic Mulch 1, (1) 0 SSA Hydroseeding 0,01 El oRr SS-5 Soil Binders 0,0l El 10 SS-6 Straw Mulch ►111 -Je�.,iiiill SS-7 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers, & Erosion ►l l ❑ 1:1 ❑ Control Blankets /Mats SS -8 Wood Mulching ❑ ❑ Temporary Concentrated ❑ El ❑ Flow Conveyance Confro/s SS -9 Earth Dikes /Drainage Swales & Lined ❑ Ditches Outlet Protection Velocity Dissipatis on ❑ ❑ LSI Devices Slope Drains � 11 The Contractor shall select one of the five measures listed or a combination thereof to achieve and maintain the contract's rainy season disturbed soil area (DSA) requirements. t2) Not all minimum requirements may be applicable to every project. Applicability to a specific project shall be verified by the Contractor or determined by Caltrans. 4,na�hn�P�a r 8MP Consideration Checklist CONSTRUCTION SITE BMPs CONSIDERATION CHECKLIST The Contractor shall consider using all BMPs listed hereon. Those BMPs which are not included in the SWPPP shall be checked as "Not Used" with a brief statement describing why it is not being used. All selected BMPs shall be included in the Schedule of Values, except for those items shown on the plans and paid for as a separate item or work TEMPORARY • '• MINIMUM CHECK IF BMP IF NOT USED, STATE BMP REOUIREMENT CONTRACT No. REASON m REQUIREMENT SC-1 Silt Fence ► 17ED SC -2 Desilting Basin SC -3 Sediment Trap SCA Check Dam SC -5 Fiber Rolls SC-6 Gravel Bag Berm ✓ SC -7 Street Sweeping and CJf CJ Vacuuming SC -8 Sand Bag Barrier El ❑ SC -9 Straw Bale Barrier � ❑ SC -10 Storm Drain Inlet ► ❑ ❑ Protection WIND EROSION CONTROL WE -1 I Wind Erosion Control ► e TRACKING CONTROL TC -1 Stabilized Construction ✓ El El Entrance/Exit TC -2 Stabilized Construction ❑ 1:1 El TC -3 Entrance/Outlet Tire ❑ Wash i2I Not all minimum requirements may be applicable to every project Applicability to a specific project shall be verified by the contractor or determined by Caltrans. Attachment C BMP Consideration Checklist CONSTRUCTION SITE BMPs CONSIDERATION CHECKLIST The Contractor shall consider using all BMPs listed hereon. Those BMPs which are not included in the SWPPP shall be checked as "not used" with a brief statement describing why it is not being included. All selected BMPs shall be included in the Schedule of Values, except for those items shown on the plans and paid for as a separate item or work NON-STORM MINIMUM CHECK IF CHECK IF CHECK IF IF NOT USED, STATE BMP REQUIREMENT CONTRACT USED NOT REASON REQUIREMENT USED F Water Conservation Practices Dewatering Operations NS -3 Paving and Grinding ❑ ❑ ❑ Operations NS-4 Temporary Stream ❑ ❑ ❑ Crossing NS -5 Clear Water Diversion ❑ ❑ NSA Illicit Discharge Detection Discharge Detection b. ❑ � ❑ and Reporting NS -7 ❑ ❑ Li Water /IrPotable riga tion Vehicle and Equipment ❑ ❑ ❑ Operations NS-8 Vehicle and Equipment ❑ ❑ ❑ Cleaning NS -9 Vehicle and Equipment ❑ ❑ ❑ Fueling NS -10 Vehicle and Equipment ❑ El El Maintenance I') Not all minimum requirements may be applicable to every project Applicability to a specific project shall be verified by the contractor or determined by Caltrans. Attachment C BMP Consideration Checklist CONSTRUCTION SITE BMPs CONSIDERATION CHECKLIST The Contractor shall consider using all BMPs listed hereon. Those BMPs which are not included in the SWPPP shall be checked as "not used" with a brief statement describing why it is not being used. All selected BMPs shall be included in the Schedule of Values, except for those items shown on the plans and paid for as a separate item or work WASTE MANAGEMENT AND MATERIALS POLLUTION CONTROL BMP BMP MINIMUM REQUIREMENT CHECK IF CONTRACT CHECK IF CHECK IF IF NOT USED, NOT No REQUIREMENT USED USED STATE REASON WM-1 Material Delivery and [:1 Q/ ❑ Storage ICJ WM -2 Material Use ► ❑ ❑ WM -3 Asphalt Concrete El 1:1 1:1 Stockpiles WM-0 Spill Prevention and 10, ❑ 1� oe 1:1 Control WM -5 Solid Waste El ry 1:1 Management XJ WM-6 Hazardous Waste ❑ ❑ ❑ Management WM T Contaminated Soil El ❑ ❑ Management WM -8 Concrete Waste Vol ❑ nj ICJ ❑ Management WM -g San tary/Septic Waste mil' ICJ Management WM -10 Liquid Waste ❑ ❑ ❑ Management (Z) Not all minimum requirements may be applicable to every project. Applicability to a specific project shall be verified by the contractor or determined by Caltrans. Scheduling SS -1 F� \D PY P,C:v PR Soo H�SOpV O ESID pY 2 ;� (Not, � 1 Mo" b HO p� 1 a MO b b d�� V0 18 15 6 tl� \rte 1L 11 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization • Sediment Control • Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and This best management practice (BMP) involves developing, for every project, a Purpose schedule that includes sequencing of construction activities with the implementation of construction site BMPs such as temporary soil stabilization (erosion control) and temporary sediment controls measures. The purpose is to reduce the amount and duration of soil exposed to erosion by wind, rain, runoff and vehicle tracking, and to perform the construction activities and control practices in accordance with the planned schedule. Appropriate Construction sequencing shall be scheduled to minimise land disturbance for all Applications projects during the rainy season. Limitations None identified. Standards and ■ Plan the project and develop a schedule or to layout the construction plan. Specifications The schedule shall clearly show how the rainy season relates to soil - disturbing and re- stabilization activities. The construction schedule shall be incorporated into the SWPPP or WPCP. ■ The schedule shall include detail on the rainy season implementation and deployment of. - temporary soil stabilization BMPs, - temporary sediment control BMPs, - tracking control BMPs, - wind erosion control BMPs, - non -storm water BMPs, and C�Cattrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Scheduling SS -t Qbwr November 2000 1 of 3 1S SS -1 Scheduling waste management and materials pollution control BMPs. ■ Schedule shall also include dates for significant long -term operations or activities that may have planned non -storm water discharges such as dewatering, sawcutting, grinding, drilling, boring, crushing, blasting, painting, hydro - demolition, mortar mining, bridge cleaning, etc. ■ Schedule work to minimize soil disturbing activities during the rainy season. ■ Work out the sequencing and timetable for the start and completion of each item such as site clearing and grubbing, grading, excavation, paving, pouring foundations, installing utilities, etc., to minimize the active construction area during the rainy season. ■ Schedule major grading operations for the non -rainy season when practical. ■ Stabilize non - active areas as soon as practical. ■ Monitor the weather forecast for rainfall. ■ When rainfall is predicted, adjust the construction schedule to allow the implementation of soil stabilization and sediment controls and sediment treatment controls on all disturbed areas prior to the onset of rain. ■ Be prepared year-round to deploy soil stabilization and sediment control and sediment treatment control practices as required by Section 2 of this Manual. Erosion may be caused during dry seasons by unseasonal rainfall, wind and vehicle tracking. Keep the site stabilized year- round, and retain and maintain rainy season sediment trapping devices in operational condition. ■ Sequence trenching activities so that most open portions are closed before new trenching begins. ■ Incorporate staged seeding and re- vegetation of graded slopes as work progresses. ■ Consider scheduling when establishing permanent vegetation (appropriate planting time for specified vegetation). ■ Apply permanent erosion control to areas deemed substantially complete during the project's defined seeding window. 4 Cattrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SS -1 Scheduling F Construction Ske Best Management Practices Manual 2 of 3 abt w November 2000 Scheduling SS -1 Maintenance and ■ Verify that work is progressing in accordance with the schedule. If Inspection progress deviates, take corrective actions. ■ Amend the schedule when changes are warranted or when directed by the Resident Engineer (RE). The Special Provisions require annual submittal of rainy season implementation schedule. Amend the schedule prior to the rainy season to show updated information on the deployment and implementation of construction site BMPs. E� Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Scheduling SS -1 ces Construction Site Best Management Practi Manual 3 of 3 �� November 2000 Preservation of Existing Vegetation Y, L P SS -2 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization o Sediment Control o Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control o Non -Storm Water Management o Materials and Waste Management Definition and Preservation of existing vegetation is the identification and protection of desirable Purpose vegetation that provides erosion and sediment control benefits. Appropriate ■ Preserve existing vegetation at areas on a site where no construction activity Applications is planned or will occur at a later date. On a year -round basis, temporary fencing shall be provided prior to clearing and grubbing operations or other soil-disturbing activities in areas where no construction activity is planned or will occur at a later date. No grading or disturbances shall occur in areas identified on the plans to be preserved, especially on areas designated as Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs). Limitations Protection of existing vegetation requires planning, and may limit the area available for construction activities. Standards and Timing SpecifiCatlons 0 Preservation of existing vegetation shall be provided prior to the commencement of clearing and grubbing operations or other soil - disturbing activities in areas where no construction activity is planned or will occur at a later date. Preservation of existing vegetation shall conform to scheduling requirements set forth in the special provisions. constr Storm Waterst Man Handbooks Preservation of E>ostin Vegetation SS -2 Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual 8 � t ol4 ZlVb� November 2000 SS -2 Preservation of Existing Vegetation Design and Layout • Mark areas to be preserved with temporary fencing made of orange polypropylene that is stabilized against ultraviolet light. The temporary fencing shall be at least one meter wide and shall have openings not larger than 50mm by 50mm. • Fence posts shall be either wood or metal, at the Contractor's discretion, as appropriate for the intended purpose. The post spacing and depth shall be adequate to completely support the fence in an upright position. ■ Minimize the disturbed areas by locating temporary roadways to avoid stands of trees and shrubs and to follow existing contours to reduce cutting and filling. ■ Consider the impact of grade changes to existing vegetation and the root zone. Installation • Construction materials, equipment storage, and parking areas shall be located where they will not cause root compaction. • Keep equipment away from trees to prevent trtmk and root damage. • Maintain existing irrigation systems. • Employees and subcontractors shall be instructed to honor protective devices. No heavy equipment, vehicular traffic, or storage piles of any construction materials shall be permitted within the drip line of any tree to be retained. Removed trees shall not be felled, pushed, or pulled into any retained trees. Fires shall not be permitted within 30 m (100 ft) of the drip line of any retained trees. Any fires shall be of limited size, and shall be kept under continual surveillance. No toxic or construction materials - including paint, acid, nails, gypsum board, chemicals, fuels, and lubricants - shall be stored within 15 m (50 ft) of the drip line of any retained trees, nor disposed of in any way which would injure vegetation. Trenching and Tunneling Trenching shall be as far away from tree trunks as possible, usually outside of the tree drip line or canopy. Curve trenches around trees to avoid large roots or root concentrations. If roots are encountered, consider tunneling under them. When trenching and/or tunneling near or under trees to be retained, tunnels shall be at least 450 mm (18 in) below the ground surface, and not below the tree center to minimize impact on the roots. Caltrans Stone Water Quality Handbooks SS -2 Preservation of E>asting Vegetation Construction Site neat Management Pmctices Manual 2 of 4 November 2000 Preservation of Existing Vegetation SS -2 ■ Tree roots shall not be left exposed to air; they shall be covered with soil as soon as possible, protected, and kept moistened with wet burlap or peat moss until the tunnel and/or trench can be completed. ■ The ends of damaged or cut roots shall be cut off smoothly. ■ Trenches and tunnels shall be filled as soon as possible. Careful filling and tamping will eliminate air spaces in the soil which can damage roots. ■ Remove any trees intended for retention if those trees are damaged seriously enough to affect their survival. If replacement is desired or required, the new tree shall be of similar species, and of at least 50 mm (2 in) caliper, unless otherwise required by the contract documents. ■ After all other work is complete, fences and barriers shall be removed last. This is because protected trees may be destroyed by carelessness during the final cleanup and landscaping. Maintenance and During construction, the limits of disturbance shall remain clearly marked at all Inspection times. Irrigation or maintenance of existing vegetation shall conform to the requirements in the landscaping plan. If damage to protected trees still occurs, maintenance guidelines described below shall be followed- ft y \OLj {K �6G MOr,^OtOO�ST in Serious tree injuries shall be attended to by an ua1a+-'+t� rborista YI LL ...: \\ vaa, �OZ n.. ■ Any damage to the crown, trunk, or root system of a retained tree shall be repaired immediately. • Damaged roots shall be immediately cut clean. • If bark damage occurs, all loosened bark shall be cut back into the undamaged area, with the cut tapered at the top and bottom, and drainage provided at the base of the wood. Cutting of the undamaged area shall be as limited as possible. • Soil which has been compacted over a tree's root zone shall be aerated by punching holes 300 mm (12 in) deep with an iron bar, and moving the bar back and forth until the soil is loosened. Holes shall be placed 450 mm (18 in) apart throughout the area of compacted soil under the tree crown. ■ Stressed or damaged broadleaf trees shall be fertilized to aid recovery. ■ Trees shall be fertilized in the late fall or early spring. ■ Fertilizer shall be applied to the soil over the feeder roots and in accordance with label instructions, but never closer than 1 m (3 ft) to the trunk. The A* Comtrs Sion n Water Quality Management Coratructlon Site Best Management Practices Manwl Preservation of E)dsting Vegetation SS-2 Q�!'so/r November 2000 3 of 4 SS -2 Preservation of Existing Vegetation fertilized area shall be increased by one - fourth of the crown area for conifers that have extended root systems. ■ During construction, District Environmental shall be contacted to ensure that ESAs are protected. c Caluans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SS-2 Preservation of Edsting Vegetation Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual 4 of 4 ,y November 2000 Hydraulic Mulch SS -3 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization o Sediment Control o Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control o Non -Storm Water Management o Materials and Waste Management Definition and Hydraulic mulch consists of applying a mixture of shredded wood fiber or a Purpose hydraulic matrix, and a stabilizing emulsion or tackifier with hydro - mulching equipment. This will protect exposed soil from erosion by raindrop impact or wind. This is one of five temporary soil stabilization alternatives to consider. Appropriate ■ Hydraulic mulch is applied to disturbed areas requiring temporary Applications protection until permanent vegetation is established or disturbed areas that must re- disturbed following an extended period of inactivity. ■ Avoid use in areas where the mulch would be incompatible with immediate earthwork activities and would have to be removed. Limitations ■ Wood fiber hydraulic mulches are generally short-lived (only last a part of a growing season) and need 24 hours to dry before rainfall occurs to be effective. ■ Hydraulic matrices need 24 hours to dry before rainfall occurs to be effective. Standards and ■ Prior to application, roughen embankment and fill areas by rolling with a Specifications crimping or punching type roller or by track walking. Track walking shall only be used where other methods are impractical. ■ Avoid mulch over -spray onto the traveled way, sidewalks, lined drainage channels, and existing vegetation. ■ Selection of hydraulic mulches by the Contractor must be approved by the Resident Engineer (RE). C�Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Hydraulic Mulch SS-3 Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Y 1 of 2 � ,� November2000 SS -3 Hydraulic Mulch ■ Materials for wood fiber based hydraulic mulches and hydraulic matrices shall conform to Standard Specifications Section 20 -2.07. Paper based hydraulic mulches alone shall not be used for temporary soil stabilization applications. Hydraulic Mulches • Wood fiber based hydraulic mulches are manufactured from lumber mill wood waste or from urban sources. This type of mulch is mixed in a hydraulic application machine (hydroseeder) and applied as a liquid slurry. Wood fiber mulch can be manufactured containing a stabilizing emulsion in each bag, or specified without. • Apply as a liquid slurry using a hydraulic application machine (i.e., hydroseeder) at rates of mulch and stabilizing emulsion recommended by the manufacturer to achieve complete coverage of the target area. Hydraulic Matrices Apply a wood fiber base layer and a paper fiber top layer, both mixed with acrylic polymers as binders. Apply as a liquid slurry using a hydraulic application machine (i.e., hydroseeder) at the following minimum rates, or as specified by the special provisions, to achieve complete coverage of the target area: 841 kg/ha (750 lbs/ac) wood fiber mulch, 1,140 kg/ha (1,000 lbs/ac) recycled paper mulch and 520 liters/ha (55 gal/ac) of acrylic copolymer. ■ Alternatively, a bonded fiber matrix (available mixed in a single bag) shall be applied at the rate specified in the special provisions. If the rate is not contained in the special provisions, the bonded fiber matrix shall be applied at a rate of 3,400 to 4,500 kg/ha (3,000 to 4,000 lbs/ac) based on manufacturers recommendation, to achieve complete coverage of the target area. Do not apply immediately before, during, or after a rainfall. Maintenance and ■ Maintain an unbroken, temporary mulched ground cover throughout the Inspections period of construction the soils are not being reworked. Inspect before expected rain storms and repair any damaged ground cover and re -mulch exposed areas of bare soil. ■ After any rainfall event, the Contractor is responsible for maintaining all slopes to prevent erosion. Lt Caltrans Storrs 1Mater Quality Handbooks SS-3 Hydraulic Mulch Conutrucilon Site Best Management Practices Manual 2 of 2 4Vb. November 2000 Hydroseeding F A. n s. t.f* j SS- �Q .use BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization o Sediment Control o Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control o Non -Storm Water Management o Materials and Waste Management Definition and Hydroseeding typically consists of applying a mixture of fiber, seed, fertilizer, Purpose and stabilizing emulsion with hydro -mulch equipment, which temporarily protects exposed soils from erosion by water and wind. This is one of five temporary soil stabilization alternatives to consider. Appropriate ■ Hydroseeding is applied on disturbed areas requiring temporary protection Applications until permanent vegetation is established, or disturbed areas that must be re- disturbed following an extended period of inactivity. Limitations ■ Straw mulching maybe necessary in addition to hydroseeding during the establishment of vegetation because temporary vegetation takes several weeks to establish. • Steep slopes are difficult to protect with temporary seeding. • Temporary seeding may not be appropriate in dry periods without supplemental irrigation. • Temporary vegetation may have to be removed before permanent vegetation is applied. ■ Temporary vegetation is not appropriate for short -term inactivity. Standards and In order to select appropriate hydroseeding mixtures, an evaluation of site Specifications conditions shall be performed with respect to: - Soil conditions - Maintenance requirements - Site topography - Sensitive adjacent areas C� Caltrans Stoop Water Quality Handbooks Hydroseeding SS-4 Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual gt of 3 arva November 2000 SS- Hydroseeding Season and climate - Water availability Vegetation types - Plans for permanent vegetation ■ Selection of hydroseeding mixtures shall be approved by the Landscape Architect and the Storm Water Coordinator. The following steps shall be followed for implementation: • Seed mix shall comply with the Standard Specifications, Section 20 -2.10, and the project's special provisions. • Avoid use of hydroseeding in areas where the best management practice C. (BMP) would be incompatible with future earthwork activities and would* have to be removed. • Hydroseeding can be accomplished using a multiple -step or one -step process. The multiple -step process ensures maximum direct contact of the seeds to soil. When the one -step process is used to apply the mixture of fiber, seed, etc., the seed rate shall be increased to compensate for all seeds not having direct contact with the soil. • Prior to application, roughen the slope, fill area, or area to be seeded with the furrows trending along the contours. See "Slope Roughening(Terracing /Rounding" BMP (Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks - Project Planning and Design Manual, May 2000). • Apply a straw mulch to keep seeds in place and to moderate soil moisture and temperature until the seeds germinate and grow. • All seeds shall be in conformance with the California State Seed Law of the Department of Agriculture. Each seed bag shall be delivered to the site sealed and clearly marked as to species, purity, percent germination, dealers guarantee, and dates of test. The container shall be labeled to clearly reflect the amount of Pure Live Seed (PLS) contained. All legume seed shall be pellet - inoculated. Inoculant sources shall be species specific and shall be applied at a rate of 2 kg of inoculant per 100 kg of seed (2 -lb inoculant per 100 -1b seed). ■ Commercial fertilizer shall conform to the requirements of the California Food and Agricultural Code. Fertilizer shall be pelleted or granular form. ■ Follow -up applications shall be made as needed to cover weak spots, and to maintain adequate soil protection. ■ Avoid over -spray onto the travel way, sidewalks, lined drainage channels and existing vegetation. LA& Cattrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SS4 Hydroseeding construction Site Beat Management Practicea Manual 2 of 3 aat� November 2000 Hydroseeding SS- Maintenance and ■ All seeded areas shall be inspected for failures and re- seeded, fertilized, and Inspection mulched within the planting season, using not less than half the original application rates. Any temporary revegetation efforts that do not provide adequate cover must be revegetated as required by the Resident Engineer (RE). ■ After any rainfall event, the Contractor is responsible for maintaining all slopes to prevent erosion. A* Conan Storm Water Best Man Handbooks H droseeding SS-4 Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Y 3 of 3 November 2000 Soil Binders SS -5 ti e 5 5 oy � BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization • Sediment Control • Tracking Control is Wind Erosion Control o Non -Storm Water Management o Materials and Waste Management Definition and Soil binders consist of applying and maintaining polymeric or lignin sulfonate soil Purpose stabilizers or emulsions. Soil binders are materials applied to the soil surface to temporarily prevent water - induced erosion of exposed soils on construction sites. Soil binders typically also provide dust, wind and soil stabilization (erosion control) benefits. This is one of five temporary soil stabilization alternatives to consider. Appropriate Soil binders are applied to disturbed areas requiting short-term temporary Applications protection. Because soil binders can often be incorporated into the work, they may be a good choice for areas where grading activities will soon resume. Limitations ■ Soil binders are temporary in nature and may need reapplication. • Soil binders require a minimum curing time until fully effective, as prescribed by the manufacturer, which may be 24 hours or longer. • Soil binders will generally experience spot failures during heavy rainfall events. if runoff penetrates the soil at the top of a slope treated with a soil binder, it is likely that the runoff will undercut the stabilized soil layer and discharge at a point further down slope. ■ Soil binders do not hold up to pedestrian or vehicular traffic across treated areas. ■ Soil binders may not penetrate soil surfaces made up primarily of silt and clay, particularly when compacted. ■ Some soil binders may not perform well with low relative humidity. Under rainy conditions, some agents may become slippery or leach out of the soil. ift Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Soil Binders S" Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual of 5 macro November 2000 SS -5 Soil Binders in May not cure if low temperatures occur within 24 hours of application. Standards and General Considerations Specifications in Regional soil types will dictate appropriate soil binders to be used. ■ A soil binder must be environmentally benign (non -toxic to plant and animal life), easy to apply, easy to maintain, economical, and shall not stain paved or painted surfaces. ■ Some soil binders are compatible with existing vegetation. is Performance of soil binders depends on temperature, humidity, and traffic across treated areas. ■ Avoid over -spray onto the traveled way, sidewalks, lined drainage channels, and existing vegetation. Selecting a Soil Binder Properties of common soil binders used for erosion control are provided on Table 1. Use Table I to select an appropriate soil binder. Factors to consider when selecting a soil binder include the following: ■ Suitability to situation - Consider where the soil binder will be applied; if it needs a high resistance to leaching or abrasion, and whether it needs to be compatible with any existing vegetation. Determine the length of time soil stabilization will be needed, and if the soil binder will be placed in an area where it will degrade rapidly. In general, slope steepness is not a discriminating factor for the listed soil binders. The soil binders in Table I may also be used for dust control using the provided dust control application rates. The dust control application rates will not be adequate to provide protection from water - induced erosion. • Soil types and surface materials - Fines and moisture content are key properties of surface materials. Consider a soil binder's ability to penetrate, likelihood of leaching, and ability to form a surface crust on the surface materials. • Frequency of application - The frequency of application can be affected by subgrade conditions, surface type, traffic volumes, climate, and maintenance schedule. Frequent applications could lead to high costs. Application frequency may be minimized if the soil binder has good penetration, low evaporation, and good longevity. Consider also that frequent application will require frequent equipment clean-up. Aft Caarans Stone Water Quality Handbooks construction Site Best Management Practices Manual SSA Soil Binders 2 of 5 AAA November 2000 Soil Binders SS -5 After considering the above factors, the soil binders in Table 1 will be generally appropriate as follows: Copolymer: Appropriate for long term soil stabilization in areas where cross -traffic might occur, or where stabilization needs to be achieved in conjunction with preserving existing vegetation. Longevity can be up to 2 years, it has a high resistance to abrasion, and is compatible with existing vegetation. However, it is also relatively costly which makes it less desirable for short-term or frequent applications. Lignin sulfonare. Appropriate for short- or medium -term soil stabilization applications in low traffic areas. The moderate relative cost makes it less desirable to reapply frequently, though it typically lasts longer than psyllium or guar. With only moderate penetration and a low resistance to abrasion, it would be more suited to areas which will not be disturbed frequently by construction activities. Psyllium/Guar. Appropriate for typical soil stabilizing situations or short- term applications. Because of the relatively low cost, they can be applied more frequently. Their high penetration provides good stabilization but their moderate resistance to abrasion limits their longevity. They are not very compatible with vegetation. Applying Soil Binders After selecting an appropriate soil binder, the untreated soil surface must be prepared before applying the soil binder. The untreated soil surface must contain sufficient moisture to assist the agent in achieving uniform distribution. In general, the following steps shall be followed: • Follow manufacturer's recommendations for application rates, pre - wetting of application area, and cleaning of equipment after use. • Prior to application, roughen embankment and fill areas. Track walking shall only be used where rolling is impractical. • Soil binders shall not be applied during or immediately before rainfall. • Avoid over -spray onto the traveled way, sidewalks, lined drainage channels, sound walls, and existing vegetation. • Do not apply soil binders to frozen soil, areas with standing water, under freezing or rainy conditions, or when the temperature is below 4 °C (407). • More than one treatment is often necessary, although the second treatment may be diluted or have a lower application rate. L* Caltrans Stonn Water Quality Handbooks Soil Binders SS-6 Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual 3 of 5 abt� November 2000 SS -5 Soil Binders Generally, soil binders require a minimum curing time of 24 hours before they are fully effective. Refer to manufacturer's instructions for specific cure times. ■ For liquid agents: - Crown or slope ground to avoid ponding. Uniformly pre -wet ground at 0.14 to 1.4 Vm2 (0.03 to 0.3 gaUyd2) or according to manufacturer's recommendations. Apply solution under pressure. Overlap solution 150 to 300 mm (6 to 12 in). s - Allow treated area to cure for the time recommended by the manufacturer; typically, at least 24 hours. - Apply second treatment before first treatment becomes ineffective, using 500/6 application rate. - In low humidities, reactivate chemicals by re- wetting with water at 0.5 to 0.91/m2 (0.1 to 0.2 gaUyd2). Maintenance and ■ Reapplying the selected soil binder may be needed for proper maintenance. Inspection High traffic areas shall be inspected on a daily basis, and lower traffic areas should be inspected on a weekly basis. ■ After any rainfall event, the Contractor is responsible for maintaining all slopes to prevent erosion. L Cattrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SSb Soil Binders Comtructlon Site Best Management Practices Manual 4 of 5 mar November 2000 Soil Binders SS -5 Table 1 Pro parties of Soil Binders for Erosion Control Chemicals Copolymer Lignin Sulfonate Psyllium Guar Comments Forms semi - permeable - Paper industry waste - Effective on dry, - Effective on dry, transparent crust. product hard soils hard soils - Resists ultraviolet - Acts as dispersing - Forms a crust - Forms a crust radiation and moisture agent induced breakdown. - Best in dry climates - Can be slippery Relative Cost High Moderate Low Low Environmental Low Low Low Low Hazard Penetration Moderate Moderate High High Evaporation Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Resistance to Low High High High Leaching Resistance to High Low Moderate Moderate Abrasion Longevity 1 to 2 years 6 months to 1 year 3 to 6 months 3 to 6 months Mi nimum Curing 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours 24 hours Time before Rain Compatibility with Good Poor Poor Poor E>asting Vegetation Mode of Chemically Degradable Biologically/Physically/ Biologically Biologically Degradation Chemically Degradable Degradable Degradable Labor Intensive No No No No Specialized Yes Yes Yes Yes Application Equipment Liquid/Powder Liquid Powder Powder Powder Surface Crusting Yes Yes, but dissolves on Yes, but dissolves Yes, but dissolves rewetting on rewetting on rewetting Clean -Up Solvents Solvents Water Water Erosion Control Apply 80 1 -1,000 Uha (85- Apply 5,600-6,50011ha Apply 170 kg/ha Apply 110.220 kg/ha Application Rate 110 gal/ac). (600 -700 gal /ac). (150lb. /ac) with (100 -200 lbs. /ac) 560 -2,200 kglha with 560-2,200 (500- 2,0001bs. /ac) kg/ha (500 -2,000 fiber mulch. lbs. /ac) fiber mulch. Dust Control Apply 280 -520 L/ha (30. Loosen surface 25- Apply 170 k/ha (150 Apply at 45-70 k/ha Application Rate 55 gal/ac). 50mm (1 -2 in). Need 4- lbs. /ac). (40-601bs. /ac). 8% fines. Apply 470- 1,900 Uha (50-200 gal /ac). C� Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Soil Binders SS-6 construction Site Best Management Practices Manual 5 of 5 November 2000 Straw Mulch SS -6 S BMP Objectives • Soil Stablization o Sediment Control o Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control o Non -Storm Water Management o Materials and Waste Management Definition and Straw mulch consists of placing a uniform layer of straw and incorporating it into Purpose the soil with a studded roller or anchoring it with a tackifier. This is one of five temporary soil stabilization alternatives to consider. Appropriate ■ Straw mulch is used for soil stabilization as a temporary surface cover on Applications disturbed areas until soils can be prepared for re- vegetation and permanent vegetation is established. ■ Also typically used in combination with temporary and/or permanent seeding strategies to enhance plant establishment. Limitations ■ Availability of erosion control contractors and straw may be limited prior to the rainy season due to high demand. is There is a potential for introduction of weed -seed and unwanted plant material. in When straw blowers are used to apply straw mulch, the treatment areas must be within 45 m (150 ft) of a road or surface capable of supporting trucks. ■ Straw mulch applied by hand is more time intensive and potentially costly. ■ May have to be removed prior to permanent seeding or soil stabilization. ■ "Punching" of straw does not work in sandy soils. L�Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Straw Mulch SS-6 Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual t of 3 Coro November 2000 SS -6 Straw Mulch Standards and ■ Straw shall be derived from wheat, rice, or barley. Specifications ■ All materials shall conform to Sections 20 -2.06, 20 -2.07 and 20 -2.11 of the Standard Specifications. • A tackifier is the preferred method for anchoring straw mulch to the soil on slopes. • Crimping, punch roller -type rollers, or track- walking may also be used to incorporate straw mulch into the soil on slopes. Track walking shall only be used where other methods are impractical. n • Avoid placing straw onto the traveled way, sidewalks, lined drainage channels, sound walls, and existing vegetation. • Straw mulch with tackifier shall not be applied during or immediately before rainfall. Application Procedures • Apply loose straw at a minimum rate of 3,570 kg/ha (4,000 lb./acre), or as indicated in the project's special provisions, either by machine or by hand distribution. • The straw mulch must be evenly distributed on the soil surface. • Anchor the mulch in place by using a tackifier or by "punching" it into the soil mechanically. • A tackifier acts to glue the straw fibers together and to the soil surface. The tackifier shall be selected based on longevity and ability to hold the fibers in place. • A tackifier is typically applied at a rate of 140 kg/ha (125 lb/ac). In windy conditions, the rates are typically 200 kg/ha. • Methods for holding the straw mulch in place depend upon the slope steepness, accessibility, soil conditions and longevity. If the selected method is incorporation of straw mulch into the soil, then do as follows: - Applying and incorporating straw shall follow the requirements in Section 20 -3.03 of the Standard Specifications. - On small areas, a spade or shovel can be used. On slopes with soils which are stable enough and of sufficient gradient to safely support construction equipment without contributing to compaction and instability problems, straw can be "punched" into the C� Cattrans Storm Water quality Handbooks SS-6 Straw Mulch comtructlon Site Best Management Practices Manual 2 of 3 arbmr November 2000 Straw Mulch SS -6 ground using a knife -blade roller or a straight bladed coulter, known commercially as a "crimper ". On small areas and/or steep slopes, straw can also be held in place using plastic netting or jute. The netting shall be held in place using 11 gauge wire staples, geotextile pins or wooden stakes (as described in BMP SS -7, "Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and Erosion Control Blankets/Mats ". Maintenance and ■ The key consideration in maintenance and inspection is that the straw needs Inspections to last long enough to achieve erosion control objectives. ■ Reapplication of straw mulch and tackiSer maybe required by the Resident Engineer to maintain effective soil stabilization over disturbed areas and slopes. After any rainfall event, the Contractor is responsible for maintaining all slopes to prevent erosion. Aft Caltrans Stonn Water Quality Handbooks Straw Mulch SS-6 Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual 3 of 3 arb� November 2000 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and SS -7 Erosion Control Blankets /Mats <0 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization o Sediment Control o Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control o Non -Storm Water Management o Materials and Waste Management Definition and This Best Management Practice (BMP) involves the placement of geotextiles, Purpose plastic covers, or erosion control blankets/mats to stabilize disturbed soil areas and protect soils from erosion by wind or water. This is one of five temporary soil stabilization alternatives to consider. Appropriate These measures are used when disturbed soils may be particularly difficult to Applications stabilize, including the following situations: in Steep slopes, generally steeper than 1:3 (V:H). • Slopes where the erosion hazard is high. • Slopes and disturbed soils where mulch must be anchored • Disturbed areas where plants are slow to develop adequate protective cover. • Channels with flows exceeding 1.0 m/s (3.3 81s). • Channels intended to be vegetated. • Stockpiles • Slopes adjacent to water bodies of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs). Limitations ■ Blankets and mats are more expensive than other erosion control measures, due to labor and material costs. This usually limits their application to areas inaccessible to hydraulic equipment, or where other measures are not applicable, such as channels. AW Constrs Storm Water Best Man Handbooks Construction Storm SI[e Best Management Practices Manual Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and EC 131anketslMatstSS -9 err November 2000 SS -7 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and Erosion Control Blankets /Mats ■ Blankets and mats are generally not suitable for excessively rocky sites, or areas where the final vegetation will be mowed (since staples and netting can catch in mowers). ■ Blankets and mats must be removed and disposed of prior to application of permanent soil stabilization measures. ■ Plastic sheeting is easily vandalized, easily tom, photodegradable, and must be disposed of at a landfill. ■ Plastic results in 100 percent runoff, which may cause serious erosion problems in the areas receiving the increased flow. ■ The use of plastic shall be limited to covering stockpiles, or very small graded areas for short periods of time (such as through one imminent storm event), until alternative measures, such as seeding and mulching, may be installed. Standards and Material Selection Specifications There are many types of erosion control blankets and mats, and selection of the appropriate type should be based on the specific type of application and site conditions. Selection(s) made by the Contractor must be approved by the Resident Engineer (RE). The following criteria shall be considered in selection of the appropriate material: ■ Cost Material cost Preparation cost Installation cost Add -ons ■ Effectiveness Reduction of erosion Reduction of flow velocity Reducti on of runoff ■ Acceptability - Environmental compatibility - Institutional/regulatory acceptability - Visual impact Caftrans Storm Water quality Handbooks SS-7 Geowdiles, Plastic Covers and EC BlanketsMtats Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual 2 of 9 aolf`� November 2000 Lwy Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and SS -7 Erosion Control Blankets /Mats ■ Vegetation Enhancement - Native plant compatibility - Moisture retention - Temperature modification - Open space /coverage ■ Installation - Durability - Longevity - Ease of installation - Safety ■ Operation and Maintenance Maintenance frequency Geotextiles Material shall be a woven polypropylene fabric with minimum thickness of 15 mm, minimum width of 3.7 m and shall have minimum tensile strength of 0.67 kN (warp) 0.36 kN (fill) in conformance with the requirements in ASTM Designation: D 4632. The permittivity of the fabric shall be approximately 0.07 sec -i in conformance with the requirements in ASTM Designation: D4491. The fabric shall have an ultraviolet (UV) stability of 70 percent in conformance with the requirements in ASTM designation: D4355. Geotextile blankets shall be secured in place with wire staples or sandbags and by keying into tops of slopes to prevent infiltration of surface waters under Geotextile. ■ Geotextiles may be reused if, in the opinion of the RE, they are suitable for the use intended. Plastic Covers Temporary soil stabilization (Type plastic cover) material shall be polyethylene sheeting and shall have a minimum thickness of 6 mils. Plastic covers shall be anchored by sandbags placed no more than 3 in (10 R) apart and by keying into the tops of slopes to prevent infiltration of surface waters under the plastic. All seams shall be taped or weighted down their entire length, and there shall be at least a 300 mm (12 in) to 600 mm (24 in) overlap of all seams. ■ Plastic covers may be reused if, in the opinion of the RE, they are suitable for the use intended. A* Colnstr Bonn Site B Quality Management Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and EC &anketvMals3 of 9 err November 2000 SS -7 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and Erosion Control Blankets /Mats Erosion Control B lankets/Mats Erosion control blankets/mats shall be either straw, coconut, straw /coconut or Excelsior blanket, in accordance with the project Special Provisions, SSP 07 -390. Site Preparation ■ Proper site preparation is essential to ensure complete contact of the blanket or matting with the soil. ■ Grade and shape the area of installation. a ■ Remove all rocks, clods, vegetation or other obstructions so that the installed blankets or mats will have complete, direct contact with the soil. ■ Prepare seedbed by loosening 50 mm (2 in) to 75 mm (3 in) of topsoil. Seeding Seed the area before blanket installation for erosion control and revegetation. Seeding after mat installation is often specified for turf reinforcement application. When seeding prior to blanket installation, all check slots and other areas disturbed during installation must be re- seeded. Where soil filling is specified, seed the matting and the entire disturbed area after installation and prior to filling the mat with soil. Anchoring ■ U- shaped wire staples, metal geotextile stake pins or triangular wooden stakes can be used to anchor mats and blankets to the ground surface. ■ Staples shall be made of 3.05 mm steel wire and shall be U- shaped with 200 -mm legs and 50 -mm crown. Wire staples shall be minimum of 11 gauge. ■ Metal stake pins shall be 5 mm (0.188 in) diameter steel with a 40 mm (1 in) steel washer at the head of the pin. ■ Wire staples and metal stakes shall be driven flush to the soil surface. ■ All anchors shall be 150 mm (6 in) to 450 mm (18 in) long and have sufficient ground penetration to resist pullout. Longer anchors may be required for loose soils. Caltrans Stom Water Quality Handbooks SS -7 Geotexliles, Plastic Covers and EC Blankets/mats Conabruction Site Best Ma ayernont Practices Manual 4 of 9 �bor- November 2000 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and SS -7 Erosion Control Blankets /Mats Installation on Slopes Always consult the manufacturers recommendations for installation. In general, these will be as follows: • Begin at the top of the slope and anchor the blanket in a 150 mm (6 in) deep by 150 mm (6 in) wide trench. Backfill trench and tamp earth firmly. • Unroll blanket downslope in the direction of water flow. • Overlap the edges of adjacent parallel rolls 50 mm (2 in) to 75 mm (3 in) and staple every I m (3 ft). • When blankets must be spliced, place blankets end over end (shingle style) with 150 mm (6 in) overlap. Staple through overlapped area, approximately 300 mm (12 in) apart. ■ Lay blankets loosely and maintain direct contact with the soil. Do not stretch. ■ Staple blankets sufficiently to anchor blanket and maintain contact with the soil. Staples shall be placed down the center and staggered with the staples placed along the edges. Steep slopes, 1:1 (V:H) to 1:2 (V:H), require a minimum of 2 staples/m2 (2 staples/yd2). Moderate slopes, 1:2 (V:H) to 1:3 (V:H), require a minimum of 1 V2 staples/m2 (1 %2 staples/yd2), placing 1 staple/m (I staple/yd) on centers. Gentle slopes require a minimum of 1 staple /m2 (1 staple/yd2). Installation In Channels Always consult the manufacturer's recommendations for installation. In general, these will be as follows: • Dig initial anchor trench 300 mm (12 in) deep and 150 mm (6 in) wide across the channel at the lower end of the project area. • Excavate intermittent check slots, 150 mm (6 in) deep and 150 mm (6 in) wide across the channel at 8 in to 10 m (25 ft to 30 ft) intervals along the channels. • Cut longitudinal channel anchor slots 100 mm (4 in) deep and 100 mm (4 in) wide along each side of the installation to bury edges of matting, whenever possible extend matting 50 mm (2 in) to 75 mm (3 in) above the crest of the channel side slopes. C�Constr s Storm Wa er Duality Handbooks Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual GeoterGiles, PWStk: Covers and EC Blankets/Mats S of 9 mTimr November 2000 SS -7 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and Erosion Control Blankets /Mats ■ Beginning at the downstream end and in the center of the channel, place the initial end of the first roll in the anchor trench and secure with fastening devices at 300 mm (12 in) intervals. Note: matting will initially be upside down in anchor trench. ■ In the same manner, position adjacent rolls in anchor trench, overlapping the preceding roll a minimum of 75 mm (3 in). ■ Secure these initial ends of mats with anchors at 300 mm (12 in) intervals, backfill and compact soil. ■ Unroll center strip of matting upstream. Stop at next check slot or terminal anchor trench. Unroll adjacent mats upstream in similar fashion, maintaining a 75 mm (3 in) overlap. ■ Fold and secure all rolls of matting snugly into all transverse check slots. Lay mat in the bottom of the slot then fold back against itself. Anchor through both layers of mat at 300 mm (12 in) intervals, then backfill and compact soil. Continue rolling all mat widths upstream to the next check slot or terminal anchor trench. ■ Alternate method for non - critical installations: Place two rows of anchors on 150 mm (6 in) centers at 8 in (25 ft) to 10 m (30 ft) intervals in lieu of excavated check slots. ■ Shingle -lap spliced ends by a minimum of 300 mm (12 in) apart on 300 mm (12 in) intervals. • Place edges of outside mats in previously excavated longitudinal slots, anchor using prescribed staple pattern, backfill and compact soil. • Anchor, fill and compact upstream end of mat in a 300 rnm (12 in) by 150 mm (6 in) terminal trench. • Secure mat to ground surface using U- shaped wire staples, geotextile pins, or wooden stakes. • Seed and fill turf reinforcement matting with soil, if specified. Soil Filling (if specified for turf reinforcement) ■ Always consult the manufacturer's recommendations for installation. ■ Do not drive tracked or heavy equipment over mat. Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SS -7 Geotextiies, Plastic Covers and EC BlankelslMats L* construction Site Bast Marugement Practices Manual 6 of 9 dam- November 2000 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and SS -7 Erosion Control Blankets /Mats ■ Avoid any traffic over matting if loose or wet soil conditions exist. ■ Use shovels, rakes or brooms for fine grading and touch up. ■ Smooth out soil filling; just exposing top netting of mat. Temporary Soil Stabilization Removal ■ When no longer required for the work, temporary soil stabilization shall become the property of the Contractor. Temporary soil stabilization removed from the site of the work shall be disposed of outside the highway right of way in conformance with the provisions in Section 7 -1.13 of the Standard Specifications. Maintenance and Areas treated with temporary soil stabilization shall be inspected as specified in Inspection the special provisions. Areas treated with temporary soil stabilization shall be maintained to provide adequate erosion control. Temporary soil stabilization shall be reapplied or replaced on exposed soils when greater than 10 percent of the previously treated area becomes exposed or exhibits visible erosion. ■ All blankets and mats shall be inspected periodically after installation. Installation shall be inspected after significant rain storms to check for erosion and undermining. Any failures shall be repaired immediately. ■ If washout or breakage occurs, re- install the material after repairing the damage to the slope or channel. �fCftrannstrs Storm Mater Quality Handbooks Co ton Site Best Management Practices Manual Geotexdiles, Plastic Covers and EC elankelSiMa 7SS -9 Qabenr November 2000 SS -7 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and Erosion Control Blankets/Mats INITIAL CHANNEL ANCHOR TRENCH NTS Stoke at 1 m to 1.5 m intervals 150 mm INTERMITTENT CHECK SLOT NTS K01 TERMINAL SLOPE AND CHANNEL ANCHOR TRENCH NTS Check slot at 8 m ISOMETRIC VIEW NTS 100 mm x 100 mm ranchor shoe -- 7T/�100 mm 100 mm—J JONGITUDINAL ANCHOR TRENCH NTS NOTES: 1. Check slots to be constructed per manufacturers specifications. 2. Staking or stapling layout per manufacturers specifications. 3. Install per manufacturer's recommendations C Caltrans Storm Water Ouallty Handbooks SS -7 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and EC Blankets/Mats Construction SMe Best Management PracrUcas Manual 8 of 9 November 2000 Geotextiles, Plastic Covers and Erosion Control Blankets /Mats F '9 150 mm x 150 mm anchor trench _ --P - -- / r t Mats /blankets should be installed vertically +-4 ar downslope. r �'�' - --- mo on /r r \ \/!z� r / 00 rn / r 50 mm o 75 m overlap\/ // r. ISOMETRIC VIEW 5�WN -N TYPICAL SLOPE SOIL STABLIZATION Nib e A F cloth above so ce r of Pate - i r � -water t�b1e.- on woven ' yeotextile filter fabric under typical treatment. WET SLOPE LINING N TS NOTES: 1. Slope surface shall be free of rocks, clods, sticks and grass. Mats /blankets shall hove good soil contact. 2. Lay blankets loosely and stoke or staple to maintain direct contact with the soil. Do not stretch. 3. Install per manufacturer's recommendations SS- cNhant Storm 11Wter QuaYty Handbooks Construction Sib Beat Management Proode a Manual Geotebllsa. Plastic Covws and EC BlankehlMats 33-7 msarr November2000 g°Ig Silt Fence SC -1 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization • Sediment Control • Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and A silt fence is a temporary linear sediment barrier of permeable fabric designed to Purpose intercept and slow the flow of sediment -laden sheet flow runoff. Silt fences allow sediment to settle from runoff before water leaves the construction site. Appropriate Silt fences are placed: Applications • Below the toe of exposed and erodible slopes. • Down -slope of exposed soil areas. • Around temporary stockpiles. • Along streams and channels. Limitations • Not effective unless trenched and keyed in. ■ Not intended for use as mid -slope protection on slopes greater than 1:4 (:H) ■ Must be maintained. ■ Must be removed and disposed of Standards and General Specifications n Don't use below slopes subject to creep, slumping, or landslides. • Don't use in streams, channels, or anywhere flow is concentrated. • Don't use silt fences to divert flow. AWCaltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Sift Fence SCA �,y November 2000 t of 5 SC -1 Silt Fence Design and Layout • The maximum length of slope draining to any point along the silt fence shall be 61 m (200 ft) or less. • Slope of area draining to fence shall be less than 1:1 (V:H). • Limit to locations suitable for temporary ponding or deposition of sediment. • Fabric life span generally limited to between five and eight months. Longer periods may require fabric replacement. • Silt fences shall not be used in concentrated flow areas. ■ Lay out in accordance with Page 5 of this BMP. ■ For slopes steeper than 1:2 (V:1) and that contain a high number of rocks or large dirt clods that tend to dislodge, it may be necessary to install additional protection immediately adjacent to the bottom of the slope, prior to installing silt fence. Additional protection may be a chain link fence or a cable fence. ■ For slopes adjacent to water bodies or Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs), additional temporary soil stabilization BMPs shall be used. Materials Silt fence fabric shall be woven polypropylene with a minimum width of 900 mm and a minimum tensile strength of 0.45 -kN. The fabric shall conform to the requirements in ASTM designation D4632 and shall have an integral reinforcement layer. The reinforcement layer shall be a polypropylene, or equivalent, net provided by the manufacturer. The permittivity of the fabric shall be between 0.1 sect and 0.15 sec-1 in conformance with the requirements in ASTM designation D4491. Wood stakes shall be commercial quality lumber of the size and shape shown on the plans. Each stake shall be free from decay, splits or cracks longer than the thickness of the stake or other defects that would weaken the stakes and cause the stakes to be structurally unsuitable. Staples used to fasten the fence fabric to the stakes shall be not less than 45 mm long and shall be fabricated from 1.57 mm or heavier wire. The wire used to fasten the tops of the stakes together when joining 2 sections of fence shall be 3.05 mm or heavier wire. Galvanizing of the fastening wire will not be required. C Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SC-t SW Fence Construotlon Site nest Management Practices Manual 2 of 5 arb � November 2000 Silt Fence SC -7 Installation ■ Generally, silt fences shall be used in conjunction with soil stabilization source controls up slope to provide effective control. ■ Trenches shall not be excavated wider and deeper than necessary for proper installation of the temporary linear sediment barriers. ■ Excavation of the trenches shall be performed immediately before installation of the temporary linear sediment barriers. ■ Construct silt fences with a set -back of at least 1 m from the toe of a slope. Where a silt fence is determined to be not practicable due to specific site conditions, the silt fence may be constructed at the toe of the slope, but shall be constructed as far from the toe of the slope as practicable. ■ Construct the length of each reach so that the change in base elevation along the reach does not exceed 1/3 the height of the barrier, in no case shall the reach exceed 150 meters. ■ Cross barriers shall be a minimum of 1/3 and a maximum of 1/2 the height of the linear barrier. ■ Bottom of the silt fence shall be keyed -in. ■ Install in accordance with Page 5 of this BMP. Maintenance and ■ Repair undercut silt fences. Inspection ■ Repair or replace split, tom, slumping, or weathered fabric. ■ Inspect silt fence when rain is forecast. Perform necessary maintenance, or maintenance required by the Resident Engineer (RE). ■ Inspect silt fence following rainfall events. Perform maintenance as necessary, or as required by the RE. ■ Maintain silt fences to provide an adequate sediment holding capacity. Sediment shall be removed when the sediment accumulation reaches one- third (1/3) of the barrier height. Removed sediment shall be incorporated in the project at locations designated by the RE or disposed of outside the highway right -of -way in conformance with the Standard Specifications. ■ Silt fences that are damaged and become unsuitable for the intended purpose, as determined by the RE, shall be removed from the site of work, disposed of outside the highway rigbt -of -way in conformance with the Standard Specifications, and replaced with new silt fence barriers. AftCaftrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks construction Site Bost Management Practices Manual Sift Fence SC -1 a,bG November 2000 3 of 5 SC -1 Silt Fence Holes, depressions or other ground disturbance caused by the removal of the temporary silt fences shall be backfilled and repaired in conformance with the Standard Specifications. ■ Remove silt fence when no longer needed or as required by the RE. Fill and compact post holes and anchorage trench, remove sediment accumulation, and grade fence alignment to blend with adjacent ground. L Caltrans Stone Water Quality Handbooks SC-1 Sill Fence Conatructlon Slte test Management Pnctices Manual 4 of 5 November 2000 14 oop 3g; N 0 O 7 �CC Y Q z d d = d 3 m v 'T N (1 QC E N U % U IN. r.:. ' err. ilu° hlan retlw e INrY .O [ W IW aN• W ° IYw • «« o e el Tw Na.1• r� M= ° / el n.Y. ,n. Itl 100 JOINING SE CTION DETAIL (TOP VIEW) SECTION A -A END DETAIL IIY W. II END STAKE DETAIL (TOP VIEW) STAPLE DETAIL (SEE NOTE D) a Yep. OPTIONAL MAINTENANCE OPENING DETAIL (SO NOTE 11) DETAIL A rlrk NOTES p Ines[ 11, Mnb., a I« . .n:n m. orn I•vm . e'lYOm N i. M WI t! s N b.« .NIL N LvnN q .bp 1 4l. amid.« ... MWrI .. nmM.n m« ..ry Y nl IINY .wOnwn. I nN.� �. «.n.r .M r.•« ran. Y Yu .IwN ...n .Y\. 1 /Y \« JW N 41.w IVntll tyJn•. 4 rr..ml tM «IIJ n..-Innyn N Wlm.nl .I Mn\ Tn. lep..t In..t4a .r. 11h e. pl.N .n. mll ma .M .warty .nn . n.pY. i. Ylnlmum ° N.yb. ryr .1.b. gmnuNn. Nom m IrplcJ. ID Oa N.n«..nNl y. mlmmvm .f 1/i .ne ....Imam N 1/2 m. ngltl .1 11. YJmm.K. epely NNI N «nNr.nN In . m.m.r to «uun W lmwl r.m.in 4.Wa ell I..n. I[. lanuV wvUw. .nJl M N a.cN N .vmp I.eNWIU. Il. I.MOy r... .M Y).n Jull M Jrrt Y .IImIn.Y [. p.. LEGEND —� nM. ar.aYn -�� glwtlr N Ilw mn I.nw pWny. cx I CROSS BARRIER DETAIL SECTION C -C Ow. 1n.1.1 ,T e[rM11KM� V° 1.YISI�I.I IO. PUN .^WIM TEMPORARY LINEAR SEDIMENT BARRIER F� TEMPORARY LINEAR SEDIMENT BARRIER (TYPE SILT PENCE) (TYPE SILT FENCE) NO SCALE ut mYVamM °u N nw•mM wlm omu.m[ .xo.e N II•If\ 'T1 3 ^N • Gravel Bag Berm SC -6 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization • Sediment Control • Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and A gravel bag berm consist of a single row of gravel bags that are installed end -to- Purpose end to forma barrier across a slope to intercept runoff, reduce runoff velocity, release runoff as sheet flow, and provide some sediment removal. Appropriate ■ Along the face and at grade breaks of exposed and erodible slopes to Applications shorten slope length and spread runoff as sheet flow. ■ BMP may be implemented on a project -by- project basis with other BMPs when determined necessary and feasible by the Resident Engineer (RE). Limitations ■ Although this BMP will remove some sediment, it is not to be used in place of a linear sediment barrier (i.e., a silt fence, sandbag barrier, or straw bale barrier). ■ Degraded gravel bags may rupture when removed, spilling contents. ■ Installation can be labor intensive. ■ Limited durability for long term projects. Standards and Materials Specifications n Bag Material: Bags shall be woven polypropylene, polyethylene or polyamide fabric or burlap, minimum unit weight 135 g/m2 (four ounces per square yard), mullen burst strength exceeding 2,070 kPa (300 psi) in conformance with the requirements in ASTM designation D3786, and ultraviolet stability exceeding 70 percent in conformance with the requirements in ASTM designation D4355. L& Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Gavel Bag Berm SC 6 Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual g or 2 Q+'� November 2000 Gravel Bag Berm Bag Size: Each gravel- filled bag shall have a length of 450 mm (18 in), width of 300 mm (12 in), thickness of 75 mm (3 in), and mass of approximately 15 kg (33 lb). Bag dimensions are nominal, and may vary based on locally available materials. Alternative bag sizes shall be submitted to the Resident Engineer (RE) for approval prior to deployment. ■ Fill Material: Fill material shall be one -half to one -inch Class 2 aggregate base, clean and free from clay and deleterious material, conforming to the provisions in Section 26 -1.02 "Class 2 Aggregate Base," of the Standard Specifications. Fill material is subject to approval by the RE. Installation at Install along a level contour. ■ Tightly abut bags Maintenance and ■ Inspect gravel bag berms before and after each rainfall event, and weekly Inspection throughout the rainy season. at Reshape or replace gravel bags as needed, or as directed by the RE. ■ Repair washouts or other damages as needed, or as directed by the RE. ■ Inspect gravel bag berms for sediment accumulations and remove sediments when accumulation reaches one -third of the berm height. Removed sediment shall be incorporated in the project at locations designated by the RE or disposed of outside the highway right -0f - -way in conformance with the Standard Specifications_ Remove gravel bag berms when no longer needed. Remove sediment accumulation, and clean, re- grade, and stabilized the area. Removed sediment shall be incorporated in the project at locations designated by the RE or disposed of outside the highway right -of -way in conformance with the Standard Specifications. L� Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SC-6 Gravel Bag Berm Construction Site nest Management Practices Manual 2 of 2 November 2000 Street Sweeping and Vacuuming SSV SC -7 BMP Objectives • Sal Stabilization • Sediment Control • Tracking Control o Wind Erosion Control o Non -Storm Water Management o Materials and Waste Management Definition and Practices to remove tracked sediment to prevent the sediment from entering a Purpose storm drain or watercourse. Appropriate These practices are implemented anywhere sediment is tracked from the project Applications site onto public or private paved roads, typically at points of egress. Limitations Sweeping and vacuuming may not be effective when soil is wet or muddy. Standards and ■ Do not use kick brooms or sweeper attachments. Specifications ■ Inspect potential sediment tracking locations daily. ■ Visible sediment tracking shall be swept and vacuumed on a daily basis. ■ If not mixed with debris or trash, consider incorporating the removed sediment back into the project. Maintenance and ■ Inspect ingress/egress access points daily and sweep tracked sediment as Inspection needed, or as required by the Resident Engineer (RE). • Be careful not to sweep up any unknown substance or any object that may be potentially hazardous. • Adjust brooms frequently; maximize efficiency of sweeping operations. • After sweeping is finished, properly dispose of sweeper wastes at an approved dumpsite in conformance with the provisions in Section 7 -1.13 of the Standard Specifications. � C Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Street Sweeping and vacuuming SC -7 r November 2000 1 of 1 � Wind Erosion Control E -1 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization o Sediment Control o Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control o Non -Storm Water Management o Materials and Waste Management Definition and Wind erosion control consists of applying water or other dust palliatives as Purpose necessary to prevent or alleviate dust nuisance. Dust control shall be applied in accordance with Caltrans standard practices. Covering of small stockpiles or areas is an alternative to applying water or other dust palliatives. Appropriate This practice is implemented on all exposed soils subject to wind erosion. Applications Limitations Effectiveness depends on soil, temperature, humidity and wind velocity. Standards and ■ Water shall be applied by means of pressure -type distributors or pipelines Specifications equipped with a spray system or hoses and nozzles that will ensure even distribution. ■ All distribution equipment shall be equipped with a positive means of shutoff. ■ Unless water is applied by means of pipelines, at least one mobile unit shall be available at all times to apply water or dust palliative to the project. ■ If reclaimed waste water is used, the sources and discharge must meet California Department of Health Services water reclamation criteria and the Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. Non - potable water shall not be conveyed in tanks or drain pipes that will be used to convey potable water and there shall be no connection between potable and non - potable supplies. Non - potable tanks, pipes and other conveyances shall be marked "NON- POTABLE WATER - DO NOT DRINK." ■ Materials applied as temporary soil stabilizers and soil binders will also provide wind erosion control benefits. C� constrs Storm Water Quality Handbooks Wind Erosion control WE -1 Construction Slte Best Management Practices Manual 421t ti November 2000 1 of 2 , c. \1 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization o Sediment Control o Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control o Non -Storm Water Management o Materials and Waste Management Definition and Wind erosion control consists of applying water or other dust palliatives as Purpose necessary to prevent or alleviate dust nuisance. Dust control shall be applied in accordance with Caltrans standard practices. Covering of small stockpiles or areas is an alternative to applying water or other dust palliatives. Appropriate This practice is implemented on all exposed soils subject to wind erosion. Applications Limitations Effectiveness depends on soil, temperature, humidity and wind velocity. Standards and ■ Water shall be applied by means of pressure -type distributors or pipelines Specifications equipped with a spray system or hoses and nozzles that will ensure even distribution. ■ All distribution equipment shall be equipped with a positive means of shutoff. ■ Unless water is applied by means of pipelines, at least one mobile unit shall be available at all times to apply water or dust palliative to the project. ■ If reclaimed waste water is used, the sources and discharge must meet California Department of Health Services water reclamation criteria and the Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. Non - potable water shall not be conveyed in tanks or drain pipes that will be used to convey potable water and there shall be no connection between potable and non - potable supplies. Non - potable tanks, pipes and other conveyances shall be marked "NON- POTABLE WATER - DO NOT DRINK." ■ Materials applied as temporary soil stabilizers and soil binders will also provide wind erosion control benefits. C� constrs Storm Water Quality Handbooks Wind Erosion control WE -1 Construction Slte Best Management Practices Manual 421t ti November 2000 1 of 2 E -1 Wind Erosion Control Maintenance and ■ Check areas protected to ensure coverage. Inspection 0 Implement requirements of Section 10 of the Caltrans Standard Specifications as appropriate. Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks WEA Vdnd Erosion Control Aft Comtructlon Site Best Management Practices Manual 2 of 2 4V6. No> mber 2000 Stabilized Construction Entrance /Exit C -1 BMP Objectives • Sal Stabilization o Sediment Control • Tracking Contra • Wnd Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and A stabilized construction access is a defined point of entrance/exit to a Purpose construction site that is stabilized to reduce the tracking of mud and dirt onto public roads by construction vehicles. Appropriate ■ Use at construction sites: Applications - where dirt or mud is tracked onto public roads - adjacent to water bodies - where poor soils are encountered - where dust is a problem during dry weather conditions. ■ This BMP may be implemented on a project -by- project basis in addition to other BMPs when determined necessary and feasible by the Resident Engineer (RE). Limitations ■ Site conditions will dictate design and need. Standards and ■ Limit the points of entrance /exit to the construction site. Specifications ■ Limit speed of vehicles to control dust. ■ Properly grade each construction entrance /exit to prevent runoff from leaving the construction site. ■ Route runoff from stabilized entrances/exits through a sediment - trapping device before discharge. AftConan Storm Water Quality Handbooks Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Stabilized Construction Entrance/Ebt TC -1 mMwYr November 2000 t of 4 C -1 Stabilized Construction Entrance /Exit ■ Design stabilized entrance /exit to support heaviest vehicles and equipment that will use it. ■ Select construction access stabilization (aggregate, asphaltic concrete, concrete) based on longevity, required performance, and site conditions. The use of asphalt concrete (AC) grindings for stabilized construction access roadway is not allowed. ■ Use of constructed or constructed/manufactured steel plates with ribs for entrance/exit access is allowed with written approval of the RE. ■ If aggregate is selected, place crushed aggregate over geotextile fabric to at least 300 mm (12 in) depth, or place aggregate to a depth recommended by a geotechnical engineer. A crushed aggregate greater than 75 nun (3 inches) but smaller than 150 mm (6 inches) shall be used. ■ Designate combination or single purpose entrances and exits to the construction site. Require all employees, subcontractors and others to use them. ■ Require that all employees, subcontractors, and suppliers utilize the stabilized construction access. Maintenance and ■ Inspect routinely for damage and assess effectiveness of the BMP. Repair Inspection if access is clogged with sediment or as directed by the RE. ■ Keep all temporary roadway ditches clear. Caftrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks TC -1 Stabilized Construction Entrance/Eat Aft Construction site Best Management Practices Manual 2 of 4 November 2000 Stabilized Construction Entrance /Exit C -1 id a 0 w Q a CO zl �I X w Crushed aggregate greater than 75 mm (3 in) but smaller than 150 mm (6 in) iginal Dde ierwise specified by a soils engineer stU �I SECTION B —B N 1 NOTE: Construct sediment borrier and channelize runoff to sediment trapping device Width as required to accomodate anticipated traffic as needed or four times the circumference the largest construction vehicle h h greater Match w is ever is Existing Grade PLAN NTS- Stabilized Construction Entrance /Exit (Type 1) Com,trs Storm Water Quality Handbooks _ Constructlon Site Best Management Practicas Manual Stabilized Construction Entrance/E>ut3 of 4 a.Lnr November 2000 C -1 Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit Crushed aggregate greater than 75 mm r (3 in) but smaller than 150 mm (6 in) I Filter fabric Original a grade 300 mm (12 in) Min, unless otherwise specified by a soils engineer SECTI ) B B Crushed aggregate greater than 75 mm (3 in) but smaller than 150 mm (6 in) ry Corrugated steel panels Nnc Original grade 300 mm (12 in) Min, unless otherwise Filter fabric specified by a soils engineer NOTE: Construct sediment barrier and channelize runoff to sediment trapping device QI Q wi of �I al a. ZI Z UI xl w. r"s SECTION lU �A t Sediment trapping device L1 U� is r orrugated 5W 3 m min or %V as required to occomodote traffic, whichever f • YIUW1111at1Y11W W WV111tt�K: J �"'f.)!•, 15 m Min V or four times the circumference of the largest construction vehicle tire. Match whichever is greater Existing PLAN Grade —NTT-- Stabilized Construction Entrance/Exit (Type 2) C Caltrans Stonn Water Quality Handbooks TC -1 Stabilized Construction Entrance/Eldt Cortstruction Slte Beat Management Practicea Manual 4 of 4 aoty November 2000 Material Delivery and Storage M -7 BMP Objectives o Soil Stabilization o Sediment Control o Tracking Control o Wind Erosion Control • Non-Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and Procedures and practices for the proper handling and storage of materials in a Purpose manner that minimizes or eliminates the discharge of these materials to the storm drain system or to watercourses. Appropriate These procedures are implemented at all construction sites with delivery and Applications storage of the following: • Soil • Pesticides and herbicides • Fertilizers • Detergents • Plaster • Petroleum products such as fuel, oil, and grease • Asphalt and concrete components ■ Hazardous chemicals such as acids, lime, glues, adhesives, paints, solvents, and curing compounds ■ Concrete compounds ■ Other materials that may be detrimental if released to the environment Limitations ■ Space limitation may preclude indoor storage. ■ Storage sheds must meet building & fire code requirements. A* Constrs Storm Water Duality Handbooks Material Delivery and Storage WMA Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual ry g t of 3 Zivbwv November 2000 M -1 Material Delivery and Storage Standards and General Specifications in Train employees and subcontractors on the proper material delivery and storage practices. ■ Temporary storage area shall be located away from vehicular traffic. in Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) shall be supplied to the Resident Engineer (RE) for all materials stored_ Material Storage Areas and Practices c Liquids, petroleum products, and substances listed in 40 CFR Parts 110, 117, br 302 shall be handled in conformance with the following provisions: g • Storage, preparation, and mixing shall be accomplished in temporary containment facilities. Each temporary containment facility shall provide a spill containment volume equal to 1.5 times the volume of all containers therein and shall be impervious to the materials contained therein for a minimum contact time of 72 hours. • Sufficient separation shall be provided between stored containers to allow for spill cleanup and emergency response access. • Incompatible materials, such as chlorine and ammonia, shall not be stored in the same temporary containment facility. • To provide protection from wind and rain, throughout the rainy season, temporary containment facilities shall be covered during non - working days and prior to rain events. • Temporary containment facilities shall be maintained free of accumulated rainwater and spills. in Materials shall be stored in their original containers and the original product labels shall be maintained in place in a legible condition. Damaged or otherwise illegible labels shall be replaced immediately. ■ Liquid materials, petroleum products, and substances listed in 40 CFR Parts 110, 117 or 302 shall be stored in approved containers and drums shall not be overfilled. Containers shall be placed in temporary containment facilities for storage. all Bagged and boxed materials shall be stored on pallets and shall not be allowed to accumulate on the ground. To provide protection from wind and rain, throughout the rainy season, bagged and boxed materials shall be covered during non - working days and prior to rain events. Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks WIA1 Material Delivery and Storage AC* Construction Site Best Managamant Practices Manual �r November 2000 2 of 3 Material Delivery and Storage M -1 ■ Stockpiles shall be protected in accordance with BMP WM -3, "Stockpile Management ". ■ Minimize the material inventory stored on -site (e.g., only a few days supply). ■ Store materials indoors within existing structures or sheds when available. • Have proper storage instructions posted at all times in an open and conspicuous location. • Do not store hazardous chemicals, drums, or bagged materials directly on the ground. Place these items on a pallet and when possible, under cover in secondary containment. • Keep hazardous chemicals well labeled and in their original containers. ■ Keep ample supply of appropriate spill clean up material near storage areas. ■ Also see BMP WM -6, "Hazardous Waste Management ", for storing of hazardous materials. Material Delivery Practices ■ Keep an accurate, up -to -date inventory of material delivered and stored on- site. ■ Employees trained in emergency spill clean -up procedures shall be present when dangerous materials or liquid chemicals are unloaded. Spill Clean -up ■ Contain and clean up any spill immediately. is If significant residual materials remain on the ground after construction is complete, properly remove and dispose any hazardous materials or contaminated soil. ■ See BMP WM14, "Spill Prevention and Control", for spills of chemicals and/or hazardous materials. Maintenance and ■ Storage areas shall be kept clean, well organized, and equipped with ample Inspection clean -up supplies as appropriate for the materials being stored. • Perimeter controls, containment structures, covers, and liners shall be repaired or replaced as needed to maintain proper function. • Inspect storage areas before and after rainfall events, and at least weekly during other times. L� Constrs Bonn Water Duality Handbooks Material Delivery and Storage WMA Construction Site lies[ Management Practices Manual ry 9 3 of 3 �� November 2000 Material Use M -2 Amu BMP Objectives o Soil Stabilization o Sediment Control o Tracking Control o Wind Erosion Control • Nor> -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and "These are procedures and practices for use of construction material in a manner Purpose that minimizes or eliminates the discharge of these materials to the storm drain system or to watercourses. Appropriate This BMP applies to all construction projects. These procedures apply when the Applications following materials are used or prepared on site: • Pesticides and herbicides • Fertilizers • Detergents • Plaster • Petroleum products such as fuel, oil, and grease • Asphalt and other concrete components ■ Hazardous chemicals such as acids, lime, glues, adhesives, paints, solvents, and curing compounds ■ Concrete compounds ■ Other materials that may be detrimental if released to the environment Limitations ■ Safer alternative building and construction products may not be available or suitable in every instance. LA*Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Material Use WM 2 Construction site Best Management Practices Manual t of 2 4wb"r November 2000 M -2 Material Use Standards and ■ Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) shall be supplied to the Resident Specifications Engineer (RE) for all materials. ■ Latex paint and paint cans, used brushes, rags, absorbent materials, and drop cloths, when thoroughly dry and are no longer hazardous, may be disposed of with other construction debris. ■ Do not remove the original product label, it contains important safety and disposal information. Use the entire product before disposing of the container. ■ Mix paint indoors, or in a containment area. Never clean paintbrushes or rinse paint containers into a street, gutter, storm drain or watercourse. Dispose of any paint thinners, residue and sludge(s), that cannot be recycled, as hazardous waste. ■ For water -based paint, clean brushes to the extent practical, and rinse to a drain leading to a sanitary sewer where permitted, or into a concrete washout pit or temporary sediment trap. For oil-based paints, clean brushes to the extent practical and filter and reuse thinners and solvents. ■ Use recycled and less hazardous products when practical. Recycle residual paints, solvents, non - treated lumber, and other materials. ■ Use materials only where and when needed to complete the construction activity. Use safer alternative materials as much as possible. Reduce or eliminate use of hazardous materials on -site when practical. ■ Do not over -apply fertilizers and pesticides. Prepare only the amount needed. Strictly follow the recommended usage instructions. Apply surface dressings in smaller applications, as opposed to large applications, to allow time for it to work in and to avoid excess materials being carried off -site by runoff. • Application of herbicides and pesticides shall be performed by a licensed applicator. • Contractors are required to complete the "Report of Chemical Spray Forms" when spraying herbicides and pesticides. • Keep an ample supply of spill clean up material near use areas. Train employees in spill clean up procedures. • Avoid exposing applied materials to rainfall and runoff unless sufficient time has been allowed for them to dry. Maintenance and ■ Spot check employees and subcontractors monthly throughout the job to Inspections ensure appropriate practices are being employed. C� caitrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks WM•2 Material Use construction Site Best Management Practices Manual 2 of 2 November 2000 Spill Prevention and Control ®� BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization • Sediment Control o Tracking Control o Wind Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and These are procedures and practices implemented to prevent and control spills in a Purpose manner that minimizes or prevents the discharge of spilled material to the drainage system or watercourses. Appropriate This best management practice (BMP) applies to all construction projects. Spill Application control procedures are implemented anytime chemicals and/or hazardous substances are stored. Substances may include, but are not limited to: is Soil stabilizersibinders • Dust Palliatives • Herbicides ■ Growth inhibitors • Fertilizers • Deicing/anti-icing chemicals • Fuels • Lubricants ■ Other petroleum distillates To the extent that the work can be accomplished safely, spills of oil, petroleum products, substances listed under 40 CFR parts 110, 117, and 302, and sanitary and septic wastes shall be contained and cleaned up immediately. AftCaltrans Stone Water Quality Handbooks Spill Prevention and Control WM-4 Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual p i of 4 � r November 2000 M_ Spill Prevention and Control Limitations is This BMP only applies to spills caused by the contractor. ■ Procedures and practices presented in this BMP are general. Contractor shall identify appropriate practices for the specific materials used or stored on -site. Standards and ■ To the extent that it doesn't compromise clean up activities, spills shall be Specifications covered and protected from storm water run-on during rainfall. of Spills shall not be buried or washed with water. 11 of Used clean up materials, contaminated materials, and recovered spill ` material that is no longer suitable for the intended purpose shall be stored and disposed of in conformance with the provisions in these special provisions. • Water used for cleaning and decontamination shall not be allowed to enter storm drains or watercourses and shall be collected and disposed of in accordance with BMP WM -10, "Liquid Waste Management ". • Water overflow or minor water spillage shall be contained and shall not be allowed to discharge into drainage facilities or watercourses. • Proper storage, clean -up and spill reporting instruction for hazardous materials stored or used on the project site shall be posted at all times in an open, conspicuous and accessible location. • Waste storage areas shall be kept clean, well organized and equipped with ample clean-up supplies as appropriate for the materials being stored. Perimeter controls, containment structures, covers and liners shall be repaired or replaced as needed to maintain proper function. Education • Educate employees and subcontractors on what a "significant spill" is for each material they use, and what is the appropriate response for "significant" and "insignificant" spills. • Educate employees and subcontractors on potential dangers to humans and the environment from spills and leaks. • Hold regular meetings to discuss and reinforce appropriate disposal procedures (incorporate into regular safety meetings). ■ Establish a continuing education program to indoctrinate new employees. Caltrans Stone Water Quality Handbooks VYhM Spill Prevention and Control Construction Site Bast Management Practices Manual 2 or 4 November 2000 �r Spill Prevention and Control "i .■ -� ■ The Contractor's Water Pollution Control Manager (WPCM) shall oversee and enforce proper spill prevention and control measures. Clean up and Storage Procedures ■ Minor Spills Minor spills typically involve small quantities of oil, gasoline, paint, etc, which can be controlled by the first responder at the discovery of the spill. Use absorbent materials on small spills rather than hosing down or burying the spill. Remove the absorbent materials promptly and dispose of properly. The practice commonly followed for a minor spill is: Contain the spread of the spill. 2. Recover spilled materials. 3. Clean the contaminated area and/or properly dispose of contaminated materials. ■ Semi - Significant Spills Semi - significant spills still can be controlled by the first responder along with the aid of other personnel such as laborers and the foreman, etc. This response may require the cessation of all other activities. Clean up spills immediately: 1. Notify the project foreman immediately. The foreman shall notify the Resident Engineer (RE). 2. Contain spread of the spill. 3. If the spill occurs on paved or impermeable surfaces, clean up using "dry" methods (absorbent materials, cat litter and/or rags). Contain the spill by encircling with absorbent materials and do not let the spill spread widely. 4. If the spill occurs in dirt areas, immediately contain the spill by constructing an earthen dike. Dig up and properly dispose of contaminated soil. 5. If the spill occurs during rain, cover spill with tarps or other material to prevent contaminating runoff. C* Caltrans Stonn Water Quality Handbooks Spill Prevention and Control wM-t construction Site Best Management Practices Manual W 3 of 4 aAhm November 2000 M. Spill Prevention and Control ■ Significant/Hazardous Spills For significant or hazardous spills that cannot be controlled by personnel in the immediate vicinity, the following steps shall be taken: 1. Notify the RE immediately and follow up with a written report. 2. Notify the local emergency response by dialing 911. In addition to 911, the contractor will notify the proper county officials. It is the contractor's responsibility to have all emergency phone numbers at the construction site. 3. Notify the Governor's Office of Emergency Services Warning Center, (805) 852-7550. 4. For spills of federal reportable quantities, in conformance with the requirements in 40 CFR parts 110,119, and 302, the contractor shall notify the National Response Center at (800) 424 -8802. 5. Notification shall first be made by telephone and followed up with a written report. 6. The services of a spills contractor or a Haz -Mat team shall be obtained immediately. Construction personnel shall not attempt to clean up until the appropriate and qualified staff have arrived at the job site. 7. Other agencies which may need to be consulted include, but are not limited to, the Fire Department, the Public Works Department, the Coast Guard, the Highway Patrol, the City/County Police Department, Department of Toxic Substances, California Division of Oil and Gas, Cal/OSHA, etc. Maintenance and ■ Verify weekly that spill control clean up materials are located near material Inspection storage, unloading, and use areas. ■ Update spill prevention and control plans and stock appropriate clean -up materials whenever changes occur in the types of chemicals on site. C caltrans Stos Waler Quality Handbooks wM.4 Spill Prevention and Control '� rr construction Site nest Management Practices Manual 4 of 4 aye� November 2000 Solid Waste Management M -5 e BMP Objectives o Soil Stabilization o Sediment Control o Tracking Control o Wind Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and These are procedures and practices to minimise or eliminate the discharge of Purpose pollutants to the drainage system or to watercourses as a result of the creation, stockpiling, and removal of construction site wastes. Appropriate Solid waste management practices are implemented on all construction projects Applications that generate solid wastes. Solid wastes include but are not limited to: Construction wastes including brick, mortar, timber, steel and metal scraps, pipe and electrical cuttings, non - hazardous equipment parts, styrofoam and other materials used to transport and package construction materials. ■ Highway planting wastes, including vegetative material, plant containers, and packaging materials. Litter, including food containers, beverage cans, coffee cups, paper bags, plastic wrappers, and smoking materials, including litter generated by the public. Limitations Temporary stockpiling of certain construction wastes may not necessitate stringent drainage related controls during the non -rainy season or in desert areas with low rainfall. Standards and Education Specifications ■ The Contractor's Water Pollution Control Manager (WPCM) shall oversee and enforce proper solid waste procedures and practices. A* Caimans Sio Water Quality Handbooks Solid Waste Mans ement WMa Construction n Site Best Management Practices Manual 9 m6arr November 2000 1 of 3 M -5 Solid Waste Management ■ Instruct employees and subcontractors on identification of solid waste and hazardous waste. ■ Educate employees and subcontractors on solid waste storage and disposal procedures. ■ Hold regular meetings to discuss and reinforce disposal procedures (incorporate into regular safety meetings). ■ Require that employees and subcontractors follow solid waste handling and storage procedures. ■ Prohibit littering by employees, subcontractors, and visitors. ■ Wherever possible, minimize production of solid waste materials. Collection, Storage, and Disposal • Littering on the project site shall be prohibited. • To prevent clogging of the storm drainage system litter and debris removal from drainage grates, trash racks, and ditch lines shall be a priority. ■ Trash receptacles shall be provided in the Contractor's yard, field trailer areas, and at locations where workers congregate for lunch and break periods. ■ Litter from work areas within the construction limits of the project site shall be collected and placed in water tight dumpsters at least weekly regardless of whether the litter was generated by the Contractor, the public, or others. Collected litter and debris shall not be placed in or next to drain inlets, storm water drainage systems or watercourses. ■ Dumpsters of sufficient size and number shall be provided to contain the solid waste generated by the project. ■ Full dumpsters shall be removed from the project site and the contents shall be disposed of outside the highway right of way in conformance with the provisions in Section 7 -1.13 of the Standard Specifications. ■ Litter stored in collection areas and containers shall be handled and disposed of by trash hauling contractors. ■ Materials that are disposed of or temporarily stockpiled outside the highway right -of -way but are visible from the Highway, shall be in a neat and orderly fashion to the satisfaction of the Resident Engineer (RE). ■ Storm water run-on shall be prevented from contacting stored solid waste through the use of berms, dikes, or other temporary diversion structures or Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks 1MMa Slid Waste Management Aft Construction Site Best Management Pncticea Manual 2 November 2000 of 3 &,- Solid Waste Management M -5 through the use of measures to elevate waste form site surfaces. ■ Solid waste storage areas shall be located at least 15m from drainage facilities and watercourses and shall not be located in areas prone to flooding or ponding. ■ Except during fair weather, construction and highway planting waste not stored in watertight dumpsters shall be protected from wind and rain by securely covering the waste with tarps or plastic sheeting or protected in conformance with the applicable Disturbed Soil Area protection. ■ Dumpster washout on the project site is not allowed ■ Notify trash hauling contractors that only watertight dumpsters are acceptable for use on -site. ■ Plan for additional containers during the demolition phase of construction. ■ Plan for more frequent pickup during the demolition phase of construction. ■ Designate on -site waste storage areas and obtain approval of the RE. ■ Segregate potentially hazardous waste from non - hazardous construction site waste. ■ Make sure that toxic liquid wastes (used oils, solvents, and paints) and chemicals (acids, pesticides, additives, curing compounds) are not disposed of in dumpsters designated for construction debris. ■ Dispose of non - hazardous waste in accordance with Standard Specification 7 -1.13, Disposal of Material Outside the Highway right -of -way. ■ For disposal of hazardous waste, see BMP WM -6, "Hazardous Waste Management". Have hazardous waste hauled to an appropriate disposal and/or recycling facility. ■ Salvage or recycle useful vegetation debris, packaging and/or surplus building materials when practical. For example, trees and shrubs from land clearing can be used as a brush barrier, or converted into wood chips, then used as mulch on graded areas. Wood pallets, cardboard boxes, and construction scraps can also be recycled. Maintenance and ■ The WPCM shall monitor on -site solid waste storage and disposal Inspection procedures. ■ Police site for litter and debris. A* Const s Storm Water Quality Handbooks Solid Waste Management 1NML Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual 3 of 3 � November 2000 Concrete Waste Management CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA I=' BMP Objectives o Soil Stabilization o Sediment Control o Tracking Control o Wind Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management e Materials and Waste Management Definition and These are procedures and practices that are implemented to minimize or eliminate Purpose the discharge of concrete waste materials to the storm drain system or to watercourses. Appropriate ■ Concrete waste management practices are implemented on construction Applications projects where concrete is used as a construction material or where concrete dust and debris result form demolition activities. ■ Where slurries containing portland cement concrete (PCC) or asphalt concrete (AC) are generated, such as from sawcutting, coring, grinding, grooving, and hydro - concrete demolition. ■ Where concrete trucks and other concrete - coated equipment are washed on site, when approved by the Resident Engineer (RE). See also NS -8, Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning. ■ Where mortar- mixing stations exist. Limitations None identified. Standards and Education Specifications ■ Educate employees, subcontractors, and suppliers on the concrete waste management techniques described herein. ■ The Contractor's Water Pollution Control Manager (WPCM) shall oversee and enforce concrete waste management procedures. CAkCaltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Concrete Waste Management WM-8 QrlYvrr November 2000 1 of 4 M_g Concrete Waste Management Concrete Slurry Wastes ■ PCC and AC waste shall not be allowed to enter storm drains or watercourses. ■ PCC and AC waste shall be collected and disposed of outside the highway right -of -way in conformance with section 7 -1.13 of Standard Specifications or placed in a temporary concrete washout facility. ■ Disposal of hardened PCC and AC waste shall be in conformance with Section 15 -3.02 of the Standard Specifications. ■ A sign shall be installed adjacent to each temporary concrete washout .i facility to inform concrete equipment operators to utilize the proper facilities. ■ Below grade concrete washout facilities are typical. Above grade facilities are used if excavation is not practical. ■ Do not allow slurry residue from wet coring or saw- cutting AC or PCC to enter storm drains or receiving waters by: Placing temporary berms or sandbags around coring or saw-cutting locations to capture and contain slurry runoff. Placing straw bales, sandbags, or gravel dams around inlets to prevent slurry from entering storm drains. Vacuum slurry residue and dispose in a temporary pit (as described in On- Site Temporary Concrete Washout Facility, Concrete Transit Truck Washout Procedures, below) and allow slurry to dry. Dispose of dry slurry residue in accordance with BMP WM-5, "Solid Waste Management ", or, for on -site disposal, in accordance with Standard Specification 15 -3.02, Removal Methods. ■ Collect residue from grooving and grinding operations in accordance with Standard Specifications Section 42 -1.02 and 42 -2.02, "Construction." On -site Temporary Concrete Washout Facility, Transit Truck Washout Procedures ■ Temporary concrete washout facilities shall be located a minimum of 15 in (50 ft) from storm drain inlets, open drainage facilities, and watercourses, unless determined unfeasible by the RE. Each facility shall be located away from construction traffic or access areas to prevent disturbance or tracking. ■ A sign shall be installed adjacent to each washout facility to inform concrete equipment operators to utilize the proper facilities. The sign shall be L� caltrans storm Water Quality Handbooks YYlA-0 concrete Waste Management construction Stts Best Management Practices Manuat November 2000 2 o(a Concrete Waste Management M -8 installed as shown on the plans and in conformance with the provisions in Section 56 -2, 'Roadside Signs ", of the Standard Specifications. • Temporary concrete washout facilities shall be constructed above grade or below grade at the option of the Contractor. Temporary concrete washout facilities shall be constructed and maintained in sufficient quantity and size to contain all liquid and concrete waste generated by washout operations. • Temporary washout facilities shall have a temporary pit or bermed areas of sufficient volume to completely contain all liquid and waste concrete materials generated during washout procedures. • Perform washout of concrete trucks in designated areas only. • Once concrete wastes are washed into the designated area and allowed to harden, the concrete shall be broken up, removed, and disposed of per BMP WM -5, "Solid Waste Management ", and in conformance with the provisions in Section 15 -3.02, 'Removal Methods ", of the Standard Specifications. Dispose of hardened concrete on a regular basis. • Temporary Concrete Washout Facility (Type Above Grade) - Temporary concrete washout facility (type above grade) shall be constructed as shown on the plans, with a recommended minimum length and minimum width of 3m, but with sufficient quantity and volume to contain all liquid and concrete waste generated by washout operations. The length and width of a facility may be increased, at the Contractor's expense, upon approval of the RE. Straw bales, wood stakes, and sandbag materials shall conform to the provisions in BMP SC -9, "Straw Bale Barrier ". Plastic lining material shall be a minimum of 60 mil polyethylene sheeting and shall be free of holes, tears or other defects that compromise the impermeability of the material. Portable delineators shall conform to the provisions in Section 12 -3.04, "Portable Delineators ", of the Standard Specifications. The delineator bases shall be cemented to the pavement in the same manner as provided for cementing pavement markers to pavement in Section 85 -1.06, "Placement ", of the Standard Specifications. Portable delineators shall be applied only to a clean, dry surface. ■ Temporary Concrete Washout Facility (Type Below Grade) Temporary concrete washout facility (type below grade) shall be constructed as shown on the plans, with a recommended minimum A* Constrs Storm Water Quality ge Handbooks P Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Concrete Waste Management VYof 4 arb o November 2000 3 of 4 M_g Concrete Waste Management length and minimum width of 3m (10 ft). The quantity and volume shall be sufficient to contain all liquid and concrete waste generated by washout operations. The length and width of a facility may be increased, at the Contractor's expense, upon approval of the RE. Lath and flagging shall be commercial type. Removal of Temporary Concrete Washout Facilities When temporary concrete washout facilities are no longer required for the work, as determined by the RE, the hardened concrete shall be removed and disposed of in conformance with the provisions in Section 15 -3.02 of the Standard Specifications. Materials used to construct temporary concrete washout facilities shall become the property of the Contractor, shall be removed from the site of the work, and shall be disposed of outside the highway right -of -way in conformance with the provisions in Section 7 -1.13 of the Standard Specifications. • Holes, depressions or other ground disturbance caused by the removal of the temporary concrete washout facilities shall be backfrlled and repaired in conformance with the provisions in Section 15-1.02, "Preservation of Property," of the Standard Specifications. Maintenance and ■ The Contractor's Water Pollution Control Manager (WPCM) shall monitor Inspection on site concrete waste storage and disposal procedures at least weekly. • The WPCM shall monitor concrete working tasks, such as saw cutting, coring, grinding and grooving at least weekly to ensure proper methods are employed. ■ Temporary concrete washout facilities shall be maintained to provide adequate holding capacity with a minimum freeboard of 10Omm for above grade facilities and 30Omm for below grade facilities. Maintaining temporary concrete washout facilities shall include removing and disposing of hardened concrete and returning the facilities to a functional condition. Hardened concrete materials shall be removed and disposed of in conformance with the provisions in Section 15 -3.02, "Removal Methods," of the Standard Specifications. ■ Existing facilities must be cleaned, or new facilities must be constructed and ready for use once the washout is 75% full. Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks VVMA Concrete Waste Management Affi* construction Site nest Management Practices Manual 4 of 4 4vb� November 2000 Sanitary /Septic Waste Management M -9 8 BMP Objectives o Soil Stabilization o Sediment Control o Tracking Control o Wind Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and Procedures and practices to minimize or eliminate the discharge of construction Purpose site sanitary/septic waste materials to the storm drain system or to watercourses. Appropriate Sanitary/septic waste management practices are implemented on all construction Applications sites that use temporary or portable sanitary/septic waste systems. Limitations Not applicable. Standards and Education Specifications v Educate employees, subcontractors, and suppliers on sanitary/septic waste storage and disposal procedures. ■ Educate employees, subcontractors, and suppliers of potential dangers to humans and the environment from sanitary/septic wastes. ■ Instruct employees, subcontractors, and suppliers in identification of sanitary/septic waste. ■ Hold regular meetings to discuss and reinforce disposal procedures (incorporate into regular safety meetings). ■ Establish a continuing education program to indoctrinate new employees. Storage and Disposal Procedures Temporary sanitary facilities shall be located away from drainage facilities, watercourses, and from traffic circulation. When subjected to high winds or risk of high winds, as determined by the Resident Engineer (RE), temporary A* 1 of 2 Caltrans Sloan Water Quality Handbooks Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Sanitary/Septic Waste Management Wof 2 avi� November 2000 M -9 Sanitary /Septic Waste Management Maintenance and Inspection sanitary facilities shall be secured to prevent overtummg. ■ Wastewater shall not be discharged or buried within the highway right -of -way. ■ Sanitary and septic systems that discharge directly into sanitary sewer systems, where permissible, shall comply with the local health agency, city, county, and sewer district requirements. ■ if using an on site disposal system, such as a septic system, comply with local health agency requirements. ■ Properly connect temporary sanitary facilities that discharge to the sanitary sewer system to avoid illicit discharges. ■ Ensure that sanitary/septic facilities are maintained in good working order by a licensed service. ■ Use only reputable, licensed sanitary/septic waste haulers. ■ The Contractor's Water Pollution Control Manager (WPCM) shall monitor on site sanitary/septic waste storage and disposal procedures at least weekly. L Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks YVM-9 Sanitary/Septic Waste Management Comtruction Site Beat Management Pncticss Manual November 2000 2 of 2 my-� Paving and Grinding Operations NS -3 BMP Objectives o Soil Stabilization • Sediment Control • Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and Procedures that minimize pollution of storm water runoff during paving Purpose operations, including new paving and preparation of existing paved surfaces for overlays. Appropriate These procedures are implemented where paving, surfacing, resurfacing, or Applications sawcutting, may pollute storm water runoff or discharge to the storm drain system or watercourses. Limitations ■ Finer solids are not effectively removed by filtration systems. ■ Paving opportunities may be limited during wet weather. Standards and ■ Substances used to coat asphalt transport trucks and asphalt trucks and Specifications asphalt spreading equipment shall not contain soap and shall be non- foaming and non - toxic. ■ Place drip pans or absorbent materials under paving equipment while not in use, to catch and/or contain drips and leaks. See also BMP WM -10, "Liquid Waste Management". ■ When paving involves asphaltic concrete (AC), the following steps shall be implemented to prevent the discharge of grinding residue, uncompacted or loose AC, tack coats, equipment cleaners, or unrelated paving materials: Minimize the washing of sand or gravel from new asphalt into storm drains, streets, and creeks by sweeping where practical. Old or spilled asphalt must be disposed as approved by the Resident Engineer (RE). C� caltrans onn Water Quality Handbooks construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Paving and Grinding Operations NS-3 �Svrar November 2000 1 of 4 NS -3 Paving and Grinding Operations AC grindings, pieces, or chunks used in embankments or shoulder backing must not be allowed to enter any storm drains or watercourses. Apply temporary perimeter controls until structure is stabilized or permanent controls are in place. Examples of temporary perimeter controls can be found in the following BMPs: SS -10, "Earth Dikes/Drainage Swales & Ditches"; SC -1, "Silt Fence"; or SC -5, "Fiber Rolls ". Collect and remove all broken asphalt and recycle when practical; otherwise, dispose in accordance with Standard Specification 7 -1.13. Any AC chunks and pieces used in embankments must be placed above the water table and covered by at least 0.3m (1 ft) of material. Use only non -toxic substances to coat asphalt transport trucks and asphalt spreading equipment. ■ Drainage inlet structures and manholes shall be covered with filter fabric during application of seal coat, tack coat, slurry seal, and/or fog seal. ■ Seal coat, tack coat, slurry seal, or fog seal shall not be applied if rainfall is predicted to occur during the application or curing period. ■ Clean asphalt coated equipment off-site whenever possible. When cleaning dry, hardened asphalt from equipment, manage hardened asphalt debris as described in BMP WM -5, "Solid Waste Management ". Any cleaning on site shall follow BMP NS -8, "Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning ". ■ Do not wash sweepings from exposed aggregate concrete into a storm drain system. Collect and reran to aggregate base stockpile, or dispose of properly. ■ Allow aggregate rinse to settle. 'Then, either allow rinse water to dry in a temporary pit as described in BMP WM -08, "Concrete Waste Management", or pump the water to the sanitary sewer if allowed by the local wastewater authority. ■ Do not allow saw -cut Portland Concrete Cement (PCC) slurry to enter storm drains or watercourses. Residue from grinding operations shall be picked up by means of a vacuum attachment to the grinding machine, shall not be allowed to flow across the pavement, and shall not be left on the surface of the pavement. See also BMP WM -8, "Concrete Waste Management'; and BMP WM -10, "Liquid Waste Management ". CA* Caltrans Storrs Water Quality Handbooks NS-3 Paving and Grinding Operations Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual 2 of 4 avimr November 2000 Paving and Grinding Operations NS -3 Pavement Grinding and Removal • Collect digout material by mechanical or manual methods. This material may be recycled if approved by the RE for use as shoulder backing or base material at locations approved by the RE. • If digout material cannot be recycled, transport the material back to a Maintenance facility or approved storage site. • Digout activities shall not be conducted in the rain. • When approved by the RE, stockpile material removed from roadways away from drain inlets, drainage ditches, and watercourses. • Disposal of PCC and AC waste shall be in conformance with Section 15 -3.02 of the Standard Specifications. See also BM? WM -8, "Concrete Waste Management'. Thermoplastic Striping ■ All thermoplastic striper and pre- heater equipment shutoff valves shall be inspected to ensure that they are working properly to prevent leaking thermoplastic from entering drain inlets, the storm water drainage system, or watercourses. • The pre - heater shall be filled carefully to prevent splashing or spilling of hot thermoplastic. Leave six inches of space at the top of the pre- heater container when filling thermoplastic to allow room for material to move when the vehicle is deadheaded. • Contractor shall not pre -heat, transfer, or load thermoplastic near drain inlets or watercourses. • Clean truck beds daily of loose debris and melted thermoplastic. When possible recycle thermoplastic material. Thermoplastic waste shall be disposed of in accordance with Standard Specification 7 -1.13. Raised/Recessed Pavement Marker Application and Removal ■ Do not transfer or load bituminous material near drain inlets, the storm water drainage system or watercourses. ■ Melting tanks shall be loaded with care and not filled to beyond six inches from the top to leave room for splashing when vehicle is deadheaded. • When servicing or filling melting tanks, ensure all pressure is released before removing lids to avoid spills. C�Caftrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Paving and Grinding Operations NS-3 awb� November 2000 3 of 4 NS -3 Paving and Grinding Operations ■ On large scale projects, use mechanical or manual methods to collect excess bituminous material from the roadway after removal of markers. ■ Waste shall be disposed of in accordance with Standard Specification 7 -1.13. Maintenance and ■ Inspect and maintain machinery regularly to minimize leaks and drips. Inspection ■ Ensure that employees and subcontractors are implementing appropriate measures during paving operations. L� Caltrans Stom Water Quality Handbooks NS-3 Paving and Grinding Operations Construction SNa Best Management Practices Manual �- November 2000 4 of 4 Clear Water Diversion NS- DN BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization • Sediment Control • Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control • Non-Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and Clear water diversion consists of a system of structures and measures that Purpose intercept clear surface water runoff upstream of a project site, transport it around the site, and discharge it downstream with minimal water quality degradation for either the project construction operations or the construction of the diversion. Structures commonly used as part of this system include diversion ditches, berms, dikes, slope drains, drainage and interceptor swales. Appropriate Implemented where appropriate permits (1601 Agreement) have been secured and Applications work must be performed in a running stream or water body. Limitations ■ Diversion/encroachment activities will usually disturb the waterway during installation and removal of diversion structures. ■ Specific permit requirements or mitigation measures, such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), etc. may be included in contract documents because of clear water diversion/encroachment activities. ■ Diversiontencroachment activities may constrict the waterway, which can obstruct flood flows and cause flooding or washouts. Standards and General Specifications ■ Where working areas encroach on live streams, barriers adequate to prevent the flow of muddy water into streams shall be constructed and maintained between working areas and streams. During construction of the barriers, muddying of streams shall be held to a minimum. Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Clear Water Diversion NS-6 mbar November 2000 1 of 4 NS -5 Clear Water Diversion ■ Diversion structures must be adequately designed to accommodate fluctuations in water depth or flow volume due to tides, storms, flash floods, etc. ■ Heavy equipment driven in wet portions of a water body to accomplish work shall be completely clean of petroleum residue, and water levels are below the gear boxes of the equipment in use, or lubricants and fuels are sealed such that inundation by water shall not result in leaks. ■ Mechanical equipment operated in the water shall not be submerged to a point above any axle of said mechanical equipment. ■ Excavation equipment buckets may reach out into the water for the purpose of removing or placing fill materials. Only the bucket of an excavator/backhoe may operate in a water body. The main body of the crane /excavator/backhoe shall not enter water covered portions of a water body, except as necessary to cross the stream to access the work site. ■ Stationary equipment such as motors and pumps, located within or adjacent to a water body, shall be positioned over drip pans. ■ When any artificial obstruction is being constructed, maintained, or placed in operation, sufficient water shall, at all times, be allowed to pass downstream to maintain aquatic life downstream. ■ The exterior of vehicles and equipment that will encroach on a water body within the project shall be maintained free of grease, oil, fuel, and residues. ■ Disturbance or removal of vegetation shall not exceed the minimum necessary to complete operations. Precautions shall be taken to avoid damage to vegetation by people or equipment. ■ Riparian vegetation, when removed pursuant to the provisions of the work, shall be cut off no lower than ground level to promote rapid re- growth. Access roads and work areas built over riparian vegetation shall be covered by a sufficient layer of clean river run cobble to prevent damage to the underlying soil and root structure. The cobble shall be removed upon completion of project activities. ■ Drip pans shall be placed under all vehicles and equipment placed on docks, barges, or other structures over water bodies when the vehicle or equipment is planned to be idle for more than one hour. Where possible, avoid or minimize diversion/encroachment impacts by scheduling construction during periods of low flow or when the stream is dry. See also the project special provisions for scheduling requirements. C Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks NS-6 Clear Water Diversion Construction Site Best Management Pracdcw Manual 2 of 4 November 2000 Illicit Connection /Illegal Discharge Detection and Reporting NS -6 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization • Sediment Control • Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and Procedures and practices designed for construction contractors to recognize illicit Purpose connections or illegally dumped or discharged materials on a construction site and report incidents to the Resident Engineer (RE). Appropriate ■ Illicit connection/illegal discharge detection and reporting is applicable Applications anytime an illicit discharge is discovered or illegally dumped material is found on the construction site. ■ This best management practice (BMP) applies to all construction projects. Limitations ■ Unlabeled or non- identifiable material shall be assumed to be hazardous. ■ Illicit connections and illegal discharges or dumping, for the purposes of this BMP, refer to discharges and dumping caused by parties other than the contractor. ■ Procedures and practices presented in this BMP are general. Contractor shall use extreme caution, immediately notify the RE when illicit connections or illegal dumping or discharges are discovered, and take no further action unless directed by the RE. ■ If pre - existing hazardous materials or wastes are known to exist on site, the contractor's responsibility will be detailed in separate special provisions. L* Caltrane Stone Water Quality Handbooks Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Illicit ConnectloMllegal Discharge Detection and Reporting NS-6 0fyun/ November 2000 1 of 3 y 1v Ayr NS -6 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization • Sediment Control • Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and Procedures and practices designed for construction contractors to recognize illicit Purpose connections or illegally dumped or discharged materials on a construction site and report incidents to the Resident Engineer (RE). Appropriate ■ Illicit connection/illegal discharge detection and reporting is applicable Applications anytime an illicit discharge is discovered or illegally dumped material is found on the construction site. ■ This best management practice (BMP) applies to all construction projects. Limitations ■ Unlabeled or non- identifiable material shall be assumed to be hazardous. ■ Illicit connections and illegal discharges or dumping, for the purposes of this BMP, refer to discharges and dumping caused by parties other than the contractor. ■ Procedures and practices presented in this BMP are general. Contractor shall use extreme caution, immediately notify the RE when illicit connections or illegal dumping or discharges are discovered, and take no further action unless directed by the RE. ■ If pre - existing hazardous materials or wastes are known to exist on site, the contractor's responsibility will be detailed in separate special provisions. L* Caltrane Stone Water Quality Handbooks Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Illicit ConnectloMllegal Discharge Detection and Reporting NS-6 0fyun/ November 2000 1 of 3 NS -6 Illicit Connection /Illegal Discharge Detection and reporting Standards and Planning Specifications a Inspect site before beginning the job for evidence of illicit connections or illegal dumping or discharges. ■ Inspect site regularly during project execution for evidence of illicit connections or illegal dumping or discharges. ■ Observe site perimeter for evidence or potential of illicitly discharged or illegally dumped material which may enter the job site. Identification of illicit connections and illegal dumping or discharges. ■ Solids - Look for debris, or rubbish piles. Solid waste dumping often occurs on roadways with light traffic loads or in areas not easily visible from the traveled way. ■ Liquids - signs of illegal liquid dumping or discharge can include: Visible signs of staining or unusual colors to the pavement or surrounding adjacent soils Pungent odors coming from the drainage systems. Discoloration or oily substances in the water or stains and residues detained within ditches, channels or drain boxes. Abnormal water flow during the dry weather season. ■ Urban Areas - Evidence of illicit connections or illegal discharges is typically detected at storm drain outfall locations or at manholes. Signs of an illicit connection or illegal discharge can include: - Abnormal water flow during the dry weather season. - Unusual flows in subdrain systems used for dewatering. - Pungent odors coming from the drainage systems. Discoloration or oily substances in the water or stains and residues detained within ditches, channels or drain boxes. - Excessive sediment deposits, particularly adjacent to or near active off - site construction projects. Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks NSA Illicit ConnecGOMllegal Discharge Detection and Reporting L Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual � November 2000 2 of 3 Illicit Connection /Illegal Discharge NS -6 Detection and Reporting ■ Rural Areas - Illicit connections or illegal discharges involving irrigation drainage ditches are detected by visual inspections. Signs of an illicit discharge can include: Abnormal water flow during the dry weather season. Non - standard junction structures. Broken concrete or other disturbances at or near junction structures. Reporting ■ Notify the RE of any illicit connections and illegal dumping or discharge incidents at the time of discovery. The RE will notify the District Storm Water Coordinator for reporting. Cleanup and The contractor is not responsible for investigation and clean up of illicit or illegal Removal dumping or discharges not generated by the contractor. Caltrans may direct contractor to clean up non - hazardous dumped or discharged material on the construction site. AftConstru Storm Water Quality Handbooks Construction Storm Sitn Best Management Practices Manual Illicit Connecfiorvlllegal Discharge Detection and Reporting NS-6 6a6"r November 2000 3 of 3 Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning �G J 4 -G NS -8 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization • Sediment Control • Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and Procedures and practices used to minimize or eliminate the discharge of pollutants Purpose from vehicle and equipment cleaning operations to storm drain system or to watercourses. Appropriate These procedures are applied on all construction sites where vehicle and Applications equipment cleaning is performed. Limitations None. Standards and ■ On -site vehicle and equipment washing is discouraged. Specifications ■ Cleaning of vehicles and equipment with soap, solvents or steam shall not occur on the project site unless the Resident Engineer (RE) has been notified in advance and the resulting wastes are fully contained and disposed of outside the highway right -of -way in conformance with the provisions in Section 7 -1.13 of the Standard Specifications. Resulting wastes shall not be discharged or buried within the highway right-of-way. ■ Vehicle and equipment wash water shall be contained for percolation or evaporative drying away from storm drain inlets or watercourses and shall not be discharged within the highway right -of -way. All vehicles/equipment that regularly enter and leave the construction site must be cleaned off -site. in When vehicle /equipment washing/cleaning must occur on -site, and the operation cannot be located within a structure or building equipped with appropriate disposal facilities, the outside cleaning area shall have the A* constr Stone Water Quality Handbooks Construction Site Beat Management Practices Manual Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning NS-8 v November 2000 of 2 61Sm NS -8 Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning following characteristics, and shall be arranged with the construction storm water coordinator: - Located away from storm drain inlets, drainage facilities, or watercourses - Paved with concrete or asphalt and bermed to contain wash waters and to prevent run-on and runoff - Configured with a sump to allow collection and disposal of wash water Wash waters shall not be discharged to storm drains or watercourses - Used only when necessary ■ When cleaning vehicles/equipment with water: - Use as little water as possible. High pressure sprayers may use less water than a hose, and shall be considered. - Use positive shutoff valve to minimize water usage. Maintenance and ■ The control measure shall be inspected at a minimum of once a week. Inspection ■ Monitor employees and subcontractors throughout the duration of the construction project to ensure appropriate practices are being implemented. ■ Inspect sump regularly and remove liquids and sediment as needed or as directed by the RE. L Caarans Storm Water Quality Handbooks NS-8 Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual 2 of 2 abbonr November 2000 Vehicle and Equipment Fueling 41* NS -9 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization • Sediment Control • Tracking Control • Wind Erosion Control • Non -Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and Procedures and practices to minimize or eliminate the discharge of fuel spills and Purpose leaks into the storm drain system or to watercourses. Appropriate These procedures are applied on all construction sites where vehicle and Applications equipment fueling takes place. Limitations ■ On -site vehicle and equipment fueling shall only be used where it's impractical to send vehicles and equipment off -site for fueling. Standards and ■ When fueling must occur on -site, the contractor shall select and designate Specifications an area to be used, subject to approval of the Resident Engineer (RE). ■ Absorbent spill clean -up materials and spill kits shall be available in fueling areas and on fueling trucks and shall be disposed of properly after use. ■ Drip pans or absorbent pads shall be used during vehicle and equipment fueling, unless the fueling is performed over an impermeable surface in a dedicated fueling area. ■ Dedicated fueling areas shall be protected from storm water run -on and runoff, and shall be located at least 15 m from downstream drainage facilities and watercourses. Fueling must be performed on level -grade areas. ■ Nozzles used in vehicle and equipment fueling shall be equipped with an automatic shut -off to control drips. Fueling operations shall not be left unattended. Aftconstru Storm Water Quality Handbooks Vehicle and Equipment Fueli NS-9 Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual n9 mASwv November 2000 1 0! 2 NS -9 Vehicle and Equipment Fueling ■ Protect fueling areas with berms and/or dikes to prevent run -on, runoff, and to contain spills. ■ Use vapor recovery nozzles to help control drips as well as air pollution where required by Air Quality Management Districts (AQMD). • Fuel tanks shall not be "topped- off." • Vehicles and equipment shall be inspected on each day of use for leaks. Leaks shall be repaired immediately or problem vehicles or equipment shall be removed from the project site. • Absorbent materials shall be used on small spills instead of hosing down or burying techniques. The spent absorbent material shall be removed promptly and disposed of properly. • Federal, state, and local requirements shall be observed for any stationary above ground storage tanks. • Mobile fueling of construction equipment throughout the site shall be minimized Whenever practical, equipment shall be transported to the designated fueling area. Maintenance and ■ Fueling areas and storage tanks shall be inspected on a regular basis. Inspection ■ Keep an ample supply of spill cleanup material on the site. ■ immediately cleanup spills and properly dispose of contaminated soil and cleanup materials. Cam. Caltrans Storrs Water Quality Handbooks NS -9 Vehicle and Equipment Fueling Cormtructlon Site Beat Management Practices Manual November 2000 2 of 2 gym- Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance NS -10 BMP Objectives • Soil Stabilization • Sediment Control • Tracking Control • Nhnd Erosion Control • Non-Storm Water Management • Materials and Waste Management Definition and Procedures and practices to minimize or eliminate the discharge of pollutants to Purpose the storm drain system or to watercourses from vehicle and equipment maintenance procedures. Appropriate These procedures are applied on all construction projects where an on -site yard Applications area is necessary for storage and maintenance of heavy equipment and vehicles. Limitations None identified. Standards and ■ Drip pans or absorbent pads shall be used during vehicle and equipment Specifications maintenance work that involves fluids, unless the maintenance work is performed over an impermeable surface in a dedicated maintenance area. ■ All fueling trucks and fueling areas are required to have spill kits and/or use other spill protection devices. ■ Dedicated maintenance areas shall be protected from storm water run-on and runoff, and shall be located at least 15 in from downstream drainage facilities and watercourses. ■ Drip Pans or plastic sheeting shall be placed under all vehicles and equipment placed on docks, barges, or other structures over water bodies when the vehicle or equipment is planned to be idle for more than one hour. a Absorbent spill clean-up materials shall be available in maintenance areas and shall be disposed of properly after use. ■ Substances used to coat asphalt transport trucks and asphalt spreading equipment shall be non- toxic. Drainage inlet structures and manholes shall CA& Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance NS -11 0 ,� November 2000 i o(2 NS -10 Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance be covered with filter fabric when seal coat, tack coat , slurry seal, or fog seal is applied to adjacent surfaces. Seal coat, tack coat, slurry seal, or fog seal shall not be applied if rainfall or thunderstorms are predicted to occur during the application or curing period. ■ Use off -site maintenance facilities whenever practical. ■ For long -term projects, consider using portable tents or covers over maintenance areas. ■ Properly dispose of used oils, fluids, lubricants and spill cleanup materials. ■ Do not dump fuels and lubricants onto the ground. ■ Do not place used oil in a dumpster or pour into a storm drain or watercourse. ■ Properly dispose of or recycle used batteries. • Do not bury used tires. • Repair leaks of fluids and oil immediately. • Provide spill containment dikes or secondary containment around stored oil and chemical drums. Maintenance and ■ Maintain waste fluid containers in leak proof condition. Inspection ■ Vehicle and equipment maintenance areas shall be inspected regularly. ■ Vehicles and equipment shall be inspected on each day of use. Leaks shall be repaired immediately or the problem vehicle(s) or equipment shall be removed from the project site. ■ Inspect equipment for damaged hoses and leaky gaskets routinely. Repair or replace as needed. Cahrans Storm Water Duality Handbooks NSA0 vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Construction Site neat Management Practices Manual 2 of 2 may,,,,, November 2000 Attachment D Program for Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair of Construction Site BMPs The contractor shall use the following guidelines for maintenance, inspection, and repair of BMPs identified in the SWPPP/WPCP BEST MANAGEMENT INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAINTENANCEIREPAIR PROGRAM PRACTICES BMPs all controls TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION BMPs SS -2 Preservation of Existing Bi- weekly ■ Inspect protective fencing and repair or Vegetation replace as necessary ■ Repair or replace damaged vegetation per SS -1 working detail is Repair damaged roots or compacted soils in the root zone SS -3 Hydraulic Mulch Bi- weekly ■ Maintain continuous mulch cover over area to be protected. Re -spray hydraulic SS -7 Plastic Covers Prior to forecast storm mulch as necessary. After a rain event that causes • As soon as weather and soil conditions runoff from the construction site permit, repair any slope damage and re- spray damaged or exposed areas At 24 -hour intervals during ■ Replace and dispose tom or missing extended rain events sections of plastic covers. Replace or supplement anchors as necessary to keep covers in place. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPs SC-1 Sift Fence Bi- weekly ■ Remove, dispose, and replace damaged, deteriorated, or otherwise unsuitable SC4 Check Dam Prior to forecast storm BMPs SC -8 Sandbag Barrier After a rain event that causes n Repair any slope damage as soon as runoff from the construction site weather conditions permit. SC -10 Storm Drain Inlet at Replace torn sand bags as required. Protection At 24 -hour intervals during extended rain events ■ Replace torn sections of sift fences. Re- key bottom of fences as needed. ■ Remove retained sediments before they reach 1/3 of the barrier height or 1/i of the sediment holding capacity is Clean and dispose of accumulated sediment deposited in sediment traps around drainage inlets. re- secure sift fence as needed ■ Remove BMPs when no longer needed, as directed by the Engineer. Repair slopes /surfaces damaged by BMP removal Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPPMfPCP Preparation Manual Program for Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair of Construction Site BMPs 66or November 2000 1 of 4 Attachment D Sample Maintenance, Inspection and Repair Program The contractor shall use the following guidelines for maintenance, inspection, and repair of BMPs identified in the SWPPP/WPCP BEST MANAGEMENT INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAINTENANCE/REPAIR PROGRAM PRACTICES (BMPs) (all controls SC -7 Street Sweeping and Daily ■ Inspect site access points daily Vacuuming ■ Sweep tracked sediment SC -2 Desilting Basins Bi- weekly in Remove sediment as necessary. Prior to forecast storm ■ Pump and discharge accumulated water. ■ Check outlet structure and spillway for After a rain event that causes any damage or obstructions. Repair runoff from the construction site damage and remove obstructions as needed. At 24 -hour intervals during extended rain events ■ Check outlet area for erosion and stabilize, if required. at Remove sediments when storage zone is one -third full. is E=xamine basin banks for seepage and structural soundness. WIND EROSION CONTROL BMPs WE -1 Wind Erosion Control Daily ■ Maintain water trucks and water distribution equipment in good order and fix leaks immediately TRACKING CONTROL BMPs TC -1 Stabilized Construction Weekly in Replace gravel as necessary. Entrance/Exit is Remove excessive soil accumulation. Prior to forecast stone ■ Sweep surrounding areas. After a rain event that causes runoff from the construction site At 24 -hour intervals during extended rain events Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPPNVPCP Preparation Manual Program for Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair of Construction Site BMPs November 2000 2 of 4 avt r Attachment D Sample Maintenance, Inspection and Repair Program The contractor shall use the following guidelines for maintenance, inspection, and repair of BMPs identified in the SWPPPNVPCP BEST MANAGEMENT INSPECTION FREQUENCY MAINTENANCERtEPAIR PROGRAM PRACTICES BMPs all controls NON-STORM WATER MANAGEMENT BMPs NS-6 Illicit Connection/illegal Weekly is Inspect site during project execution for Discharge Detection and evidence of illicit discharges or illegal Reporting dumping. NS -8 Vehicle and Equipment ■ Observe site perimeter for evidence or Cleaning potential of illicitly discharged or illegally dumped material which may enter the job NS -9 Vehicle and Equipment site Fueling in Notify the Resident Engineer of any illicit discharges or illegal dumping incidents at NS -10 Vehicle and Equipment the time of discovery. Maintenance ■ Remove, dispose and replace damaged, deteriorated, or otherwise unsuitable BMPs in Remove vehicles and/or equipment that leak. in Replace drip pans or absorbent materials as needed. Re -stock spill materials. ■ Remove BMPs when no longer needed, as directed by the Engineer. Repair slopes/surfaces damaged by BMP removal WASTE MANAGEMENT AND MATERIALS POLLUT*N CONTROL BMFs WM -1 Material Delivery and Weekly ■ Keep storage areas clean, well Storage organized, and equipped with ample Prior to forecast storm clean -up supplies as appropriate for the WM -2 Material Use materials stored After a rain event that causes in Repair or replace perimeter controls, WM-4 Spill Prevention and runoff from the construction site containment structures, covers and liners Control At 24 -hour intervals during as needed to maintain proper function WM -5 Solid Waste Management extended rain events and protection ■ Properly remove and dispose WM-9 Sanitary/Septic Waste accumulated rainwater from containment Management facilities in Cover any stockpiles with appropriate mats or covers. in Maintain waste fluid containers in leak proof condition. Repair or replace dumpsters that leak ■ Provide timely service and removal to prevent dumpsters and sanitary facilities from overflowing. in Schedule Refuse Contractor to pick up waste containers weekly. WM -8 Concrete Waste Weekly ■ Remove accumulated debris from Management concrete washouts. Replace lining and sand bags as necessary Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPPAVPCP Preparation Manual Program for Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair of Construction Site BMPs November 2000 3 of 4 Q06sv Attachment E Storm Water Quality Construction Site Inspection Checklist PROJECT AREA SUMMARY AND DISTURBED SOIL AREA (DSA) SIZE LIMITS FROM SPECIAL PROVISIONS Total Project Area 408 Hectares 10.2 Acres Rainy Season DSA Limit Hectares Acres Field Estimate of Active DSAs Hectares Acres WranS Storm Water Quality Handbooks S WPPP,MlPCP Preparation Manual Storm Water C!ualrty Construction Inspection Checklist ml6ons November 2000 1 of 6 GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name Adams Run Noltrans Contract N/A `— Contractor Cra- Is/ a Walsh Inspectors Name Joe Walsh Inspectors Title Water Pollution Control Manager Signature Date of Inspection � to forecast rain ❑ After a rain event Inspection Type -;I-Prior (Check Applicable) ❑ 24 -hr intervals during extended rain Other Season ,QfRainy ❑ Non -Rainy (Check Applicable) Storm Start Date & Time: Storm Duration (hrs): Storm Data Time elapsed since last Approximate Rainfall storm (Circle Applicable Units) Min. Hr Dan Amount (mm) PROJECT AREA SUMMARY AND DISTURBED SOIL AREA (DSA) SIZE LIMITS FROM SPECIAL PROVISIONS Total Project Area 408 Hectares 10.2 Acres Rainy Season DSA Limit Hectares Acres Field Estimate of Active DSAs Hectares Acres WranS Storm Water Quality Handbooks S WPPP,MlPCP Preparation Manual Storm Water C!ualrty Construction Inspection Checklist ml6ons November 2000 1 of 6 Atfachment E Storm Water Quality Construction Inspection Checklist OTHER REQUIREMENTS Requirement es No WA Corrective Action Preservation of Existing Vegetation Is temporary fencing provided to preserve vegetation in areas where no construction activity is planned? Location Location Location Location. Temporary Soil Stabilization Does the applied temporary soil stabilization provide 100% coverage for the required areas? Are any non - vegetated areas that may require temporary soil stabilization? Is the area where temporary soil stabilization required free from visible erosion? Location. Location: Location. Location. Temporary Linear Sediment Barriers Are temporary linear sediment barriers properly installed in accordance with the details, functional and maintained? Are temporary linear sediment barriers free of accumulated litter? Is the built -up sediment less than 1/3 the height of the barrier? Are cross barriers installed where necessary and properly spaced? Location: Location: Location: Location: Location. Storm Drain Inlet Protection Are storm drain inlets internal to the project properly protected with either Type 1, 2 or 3 inlet protection? Are storm drain inlet protection devices In working order and being properly maintained? Location Location: Location: Location: Location: Canrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPPIWPCP Preparation Manual Storm Water Quality Construction Inspection Checklist November 2000 2 of 6 allillarlir Attachment E Storm Water Quality Construction Inspection Checklist OTHER REQUIREMENTS Requirement Yes No N/A Corrective Action Desilting Basins Are basins maintained to provide the required retention /detention? Are basin controls (inlets, outlets, diversions, weirs, spillways, and racks ) in working order? Location Location Location: Location Stockpiles Are all locations of temporary stockpiles, including soil, hazardous waste, and construction materials in approved areas? Are stockpiles protected from run -on, run -off from adjacent areas and from winds? Are stockpiles located at least 15 m from concentrated flows, downstream drainage courses and storm drain inlets? Are required covers and /or perimeter controls in place? Location. Location: Location: Location: Concentrated Flows Are concentrated flow paths free of visible erosion? Location Location Location: Location Tracking Control Are points of ingresslegress to public/private roads inspected and swept and vacuumed daily? Are all paved areas free of visible sediment tracking or other articulate matter? Location. Location Location Location Wind Erosion Control Is dust control implemented in conformance with Section 10 of the Standard Specifications? Location: C�Caftrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPPANPCP Preparation Manual Storm Water Quality Construction Inspection Checklist f�mr November 2000 3 of 6 Attachment E Storm Water Quality Construction Inspection Checklist OTHER REQUIREMENTS Requirement es No NIA Corrective Action Location: Location Location Dewatering Operations Is dewatering handled in conformance with the dewatenng permit issued by the RWQCB? Is required treatment provided for dewatering effluent? Location Location Location. Location Vehicle & Equipment Fueling, Cleaning, and Maintenance Are vehicle and equipment fueling, cleaning and maintenance areas reasonably clean and free of spills, leaks, or any other deleterious material? Are vehicle and equipment fueling, cleaning and maintenance activities performed on an impermeable surface in dedicated areas? If no, are drip pans used? Are dedicated fueling, cleaning, and maintenance areas located at least 15 m away from downstream drainage facilities and water courses and protected from run -on and runoff? Is wash water contained for infiltration/ evaporation and disposed of outside the highway right of way? Is on -site cleaning limited to washing with water (no soap, soaps substitutes, solvents, or steam)? On each day of use, are vehicles and equipment inspected for leaks and if necessary, repaired? Location Location: Location. Location Waste Management & Materials Pollution Control Are material storage areas and washout areas protected from run -on and runoff, and located at least 15 m from concentrated flows and downstream drainage facilities? Are all material handling and storage areas clean, organized, free of spills, leaks, or any other deleterious material, and stocked with appropriate clean -u supplies? Are liquid materials, hazardous materials, and hazardous wastes stored in temporary containment facilities? Are bagged and boxed materials stored on pallets? Are hazardous materials and wastes stored in appropriate, labeled containers? Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPPIWPCP Preparation Manual Storm Water Quality Construction Inspection Checklist November 2000 4 of 6 Altachrnent E Storm Water Quality Construction Inspection Checklist OTHER REQUIREMENTS Requirement a No NIA Corrective Action Are proper storage, clean -up, and spill- reporting procedures for hazardous materials and wastes posted in open, conspicuous and accessible locations adjacent to storage areas? Are temporary containment facilities free of spills and rainwater? Are temporary containment facilities and bagged /boxed materials covered? Are temporary concrete washout facilities designated and being used? Are temporary concrete washout facilities functional for receiving and containing concrete waste and are concrete residues prevented from entering the drainage system? Do temporary concrete washout facilities provide sufficient volume and freeboard for planned concrete o erations> Are concrete wastes, including residues from cutting and grinding, contained and disposed of off -site or in concrete washout facilities? Are spills from mobile equipment fueling and maintenance properly contained and cleaned up? Is the site free of litter? Are trash receptacles provided in the Contractor's yard, field trailer areas, and at locations where workers congregate for lunch and break periods? Is litter from work areas within the construction limits of the project site collected and placed in watertight dum sters? Are waste management receptacles free of leaks? Are the contents of waste management receptacles properly protected from contact with storm water or from being dislodged by winds? Are waste management receptacles filled at or beyond capacity? Location: Location: Location: Location: Temporary Water Body Crossing or Encroachment Are temporary water body crossings and encroachments constructed as shown on the plans or as approved by the engineer? Does the project conform to the requirements of the 404 permit and /or 1601agreement? Location: Location: Location: Location: Illicit Connection /Illegal Discharge Detection and Reporting Is there any evidence of illicit discharges or illegal dumping on the project site? Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPP,'WPCP Preparation Manual Storm Water Quality Construction Inspection Checklist November 2000 5 of 6 Attachment E Storm Water Quality Construction Inspection Checklist OTHER REQUIREMENTS Requirement Yes No NIA Corrective Action If yes, has the Engineer been notified? Location: Location: Location: Location: Discharge Points Are discharge points and discharge flows free from noticeable pollutants? Are discharge points free of any significant erosion or sediment transport? Location: Location. Location. Location. WPCP /SWPPP Update Does the WPCP /SWPPP, Project Schedule/Water Pollution Control Schedule and WPCDs adequately reflect the current site conditions and contractor o erations7 Are all BMPs shown on the WPCDs installed in the proper locations and according to the details for the Ian? Location: Location: Location Location. General Are there any other potential water pollution control concerns at the site? Location: Location Location Location. SWPP Caltrans Storm Water ratiQuality Handbooks SWPPPNVPCP Preparation Manual Storm Water Quality Construction Inspection Checklist November 2000 6 of 6 Attachment F Trained Contractor Personnel Log Storm Water Management Training Log Project Name: Storm Water Management Topic: (check as appropriate) Adams Run ❑ Temporary Soil Stabilization ❑ Temporary Sediment Control ❑ Wind Erosion Control ❑ Tracking Control ❑ Non -storm water management ❑ Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control Specific Training Objective: Location: Date: Instructor: Telephone: Attendee Roster (attach additional forms if necessary) Name Company Phone L. -- -_. - -- - - __ -- - -_ - --- Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPPANPCP Preparation Manual Trained Contractor Personnel Log 41101hvr November 2000 1 of 2 Name Company Phone COMMENTS: CaHrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPPlWPCP Preparation Manual Trained Contractor Personnel Log � � November 2000 2 012 Attachment G Subcontractor Notification Letter (Sample) and Notification Log SWPPP Notification ABC Construction Inc, 123 Sunset Blvd., Suite 456 Hollywood, CA 90000 Dear Sir/Madam, Please be advised that the California State Water Resources Control Board has adopted the NPDES Statewide Storm Water Permit (Permit) to the State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in 1999 (CAS000003, Order No. 99- 06 -DWQ); and the General Permit (General Permit) for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (CAS000002, Order No. 99 -08- DWQ). The goal of these permits is prevent the discharge of pollutants associated w*44nstruction activity from entering the storm drain system, ground and surface waters [Contractor] has developed a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in order to implement the requirements of the Permits. As a subcontractor, you are required to comply with the SWPPP and the Permits for any work that you perform on site. Any person,.or group who violates any condition of the Permits may be subject to substantial penalties in accordance with state and federal law Yotr are encouraged to advise each of your employees working on this project of the requirements of the SWPPP and the Permits. A copy of the Permits and the SWPPP are available for your review at the construction office. Please contact me if x x hay c further yuestikm . Sincerely, John Doe .................... ................... .................. Project Sup"W&Wnt ANCaltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Subcontractor Notification Letter (Sample) SWPPPMPCP Preparation Manual Subcontractor Notification Log Qv6ar November 2000 1 of 2 SUBCONTRACTOR NOTIFICATION LOG Project Name. SUBCONTRACTOR COMPANY NAME CONTACT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER PAGER) FIELD PHONE DATE NOTIFICATION LETTER SENT TYPE OF WORK USE ADDITIONAL PAGES AS NECESSARY Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks Subcontractor Notification Letter (Sample) SWPPPMJPCP Preparation Manual Subcontractor Notification Log Aw November 2000 2 of 2 Attachment H Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Monitoring Program Checklist CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: Adams Run CONTRACTOR: raif7P / Joe Walsh SECTION A: STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) CHECK IF ADDRESSED WA IF NOT APPLICABLE SWPPP Section ITEM GENERAL PERMIT REF. COMMENTS 100 SWPPP Certification and Approval C.10 100.1 SWPPP Certification C.10 1002 SWPPP Approval C.10 200 SWPPP Amendments A.4.a, A.16 200.1 Amendment number and date entered into SWPPP - Amendment Lo A.4.a, A.16 2002 Amendment Certification and Approval A.4.a, A.16 300 Introduction /Project Description 300.1 Project Description and Location (narrative) A.5.a.1 300.2 Unique Site Features (narrative) A.5.a.1 300.4 Project Schedule/Water Pollution Control Schedule narrative or ra hica A. S.c.S 400 References A.14 5002 Vicinity Map (narrative or graphic) A.5.a.1 500.2 Site perimeter A. 5. a.1 500.2 Geographic Features A.5.a.1 500.2 General topography A.5.a.1 500.4 Water Pollution Control Drawings (WPCDs) (graphic or narrative A.5.a.2 500.4 Site perimeter A 5.a.2 500.4 Existing and proposed buildings, lots, and roadways A.5.a.2 500.4 Storm water collection and discharge points A.5.a.2 Cal rans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPP,'WPCP Preparation Manual SWPPP and Monitoring Program Checklist r35o�r November 2000 1 of 5 Attachment H SWPPP and Monitoring Program Checklist SECTION A: STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) CHECK IF SWPPP GENERAL ADDRESSED WA IF NOT Section ITEM PERMIT COMMENTS APPLICABLE REF. 500.4 General topography before and after A.5.a.2 construction 500.4 Anticipated discharge location(s) A.5.a2 500.4 Drainage patterns including the entire relevant A.5.a.2 drainage areas 500.4 Temporary on -site drainage(s) A.5 a.2 500.3 Pollutant Source and BMP Identification A 5.b narrate/ or indicate on site ma Drainage A.5.b.1 500.4 Drainage patterns after major grading A.5 b.1 5004 Slopes after major grading A.5.b.1 Attach. E Calculations for storm water run -on A.5.b.1 500.4 BMPs that divert off -site drainage from A.5.b.1 passing through site 500.4 Storm Water Inlets A.5. b2 500.4 Drainage patterns to storm water inlets or A.5.b.2 receiving water 500.4 BMPs that protect storm water inlets or A.5 b,2 receiving water Site History (narrative; if possible, indicate location(s) on the Water Pollution Control A.5.b Drawings) Nature of fill material and data describing the 500.3.3 soil. Description of toxic materials treated, A.5 b.3 stored, disposed, spilled or leaked on site 500.3.8 & BMPs that minimize contact of contaminants A.5.b.3 50039 with storm water Location of Areas Designated for., A.5. b.4 500 3.13 & Vehicle storage & service A.5.b.4 5004 500.3.8 & Equipment storage, cleaning, maintenance A.5.bA 5004 500 3.9 & Soil or waste storage A.5.b.4 500.4 500.3.9 & Construction material loading, unloading, A.5. b.4 500.4 storage and access 500 3 B & Areas outside of Owners right -of -way (yards, 500.3.9 borrow areas, etc.) BMP Locations or Descriptions I A. 5. b.5 5003 .9 & Waste handling and disposal areas A.5.b.5 500.4 500.3.9 & On -site storage and disposal of construction A.5.b.5 500.4 materials and waste 500.3.8, Minimum exposure of storm water to 500.3.9 & construction materials, equipment, vehicles, A.5.b.5 500.4 waste 500.6 Post Construction BMPs A.5.b 6 Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPPMIPCP Preparation Manual SWPPP and Monitoring Program Checklist November 2000 2 of 5 avba Attachment 1-I SWPPP and MonBonng Program Checklist SECTION A: STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) CHECK IF GENERAL ADDRESSED SWPPP ITEM PERMIT COMMENTS NIA IF NOT Seddon REF. APPLICABLE 500.6.1 Listing or Description of Post - construction A.5. b.6 BMPs 500.4 Location of post - construction BMPs A.5,LIS 500.6.2 Parties responsible for long -term maintenance A.5. b.6 Additional Information A_5 c 500.3.1 Description of other pollutant sources and A.5.c.1 BMPs 500.3.2 Pre - construction control practices A. 5. c.1 500.3.1 Inventory of materials and activities that may A.5 c.2 pollute storm water 500.3.8 & BMPs to reduce /eliminate potential pollutants X5 c.2 500.3.9 listed in the inventory 300.4 Runoff coefficient (before & after) A.5.c.3 300.4 Percent impervious (before & after) A.5.c.3 Attach. F Copy of the NOC A.5.c.4 300.3 Construction activity schedule A.5 c.5 300.5 Contact information A.5.c.6 SOIL STABILIZATION (EROSION 500.4.1 A.6 CONTROL The SWPPP shall include: A.6. a -c 500.4 Areas of vegetation on site A.6. a.1 500.4 Areas of soil disturbance that will be stabilized A 6.a.2 during rainy season 500.4 Areas of soil disturbance which will be A.6.a.3 exposed during any part of the rainy season 300.4 Implementation schedule for erosion control A.6 a.4 measures 500.3.4 BMPs for erosion control A.6. b 500.3.7 BMPs to control wind erosion A.6.c 500.3.5 SEDIMENT CONTROL A.8 500.3.5 & Description/illustration of BMPs to prevent A.8 500.4 increase of sediment load in discharge 300.4, Implementation schedule for sediment control A.8 500.3.5 measures 500.3.6 BMPs to control sediment tracking A.8 500.3.8 & NON-STORM WATER MANAGEMENT A.9 500.3.9 500.3.8 & Description of non -storm water discharges to A9 500.3.9 receiving waters 500.3.8 & Locations of discharges A.9 500.3.9 500.3.8 & Description of BMPs A.9 500.3.9 Cal trans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPP,M/PCP Preparation Manual SWPPP and Monitoring Program Checklist awb� November 2000 3 of 5 Attachment H SWPPP and Monitoring Program Checklist SECTION A: STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) CHECK IF SWPPP GENERAL ADDRESSED SWPPP ITEM PERMIT COMMENTS NIA IF NOT Section REF. APPUCABLE 300.5 Name and phone number of person A9 100.3 responsible for non -storm water management 8.4 500.6 POST - CONSTRUCTION A.10 5006 1 Description of post- construction BMPs A,10 600.3 Operabon/Maintenance of BMPs after project 8.6 500.6.2 completion (including short-term funding, A10 long-term funding and responsible party) 500.5 MAINTENANCE, INSPECTIONS, AND A 11 REPAIR 300.5, Name and phone number of person(s) All 600.1 responsible for inspections Complete inspection checklist: date, weather, 600.1, inadequate BMPs, visual observations of A.11.a -f Attach. H BI corrective action, inspector's name, title, signature OTHER REQUIREMENTS A.12 -16 500.7 Documentation of all training A.12 500.8 List of Contractors /Subcontractors A.13 SECTION B: MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS CHECK IF SWPPP GENERAL ADDRESSED SWPPP ITEM PERMIT COMMENTS NIA IF NOT Section REF. APPLICABLE 6001 Description of Site Inspection Plans 8.3 100.3 Compliance certification (annually 7/1) 8.4 600.2 Discharge reporting 8.5 Keep records of all inspections, compliance 600.3 certifications, and noncompliance reports on 8.6 site for a period of at least three years SECTION C: STANDARD PROVISIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES CHECK IF GENERAL ADDRESSED SWPPP ITEM PERMIT COMMENTS NIA IF NOT Section REF. APPLICABLE 1001 Signed SWPPP Certification C.9,10 Cadrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPPIWPCP Preparation Manual SWPPP and Monitoring Program Checklist November 2000 4 of 5 Attachment H SWPPP and Monitoring Program Checklist CALTRANS NPDES PERMIT No. CAS000003 REQUIREMENTS CHECKIF SWPPP CALTRANS ADDRESSED NIA IF NOT Section ITEM PERMIT COMMENTS APPLICABLE REF 500.3 & SWPPP references and/or includes HA 500.4 permanent and temporary BMPs .b 100-600 SWPPP contains all elements required in the H.2.b State General Permd. CAS000002 100.1 & SWPPP limits application, generation, & H.6 Attach. F migration of toxic substances 500.3.4 & Implementation of adequate Erosion and H 500.3.5 Sediment Controls after construction 100.1 & Copy of the Notification of Construction (NOC) H.B.a Attach. F SWPPP contains BMPs for mobile operations (material production or recycling operations) including AC recycling, PCC Recycling, 5003.8 Concrete Mixing, Crushing, & storage of H.&b materials that are established by the contractor on the construction site or on other property specifically arranged for by Caltrans. SWPPP applies to all areas that are directly related to construction including but not limited 500.4 to staging & storage yards, material borrow H.8.b areas, or access roads whether or not they reside in CT RNV. The SWPPP contains RWQCB WDR 500.3.8 requirements for projects that reuse Aerially H g Deposited Lead. (Applicable only for projects that reuse ADL soils.) Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPPUPCP Preparation Manual SWPPP and Monitoring Program Checklist Qibmns November 2000 5 of 5 Attachment I Annual Certification of Compliance Form Annual Certification of Compliance for the Construction Contractor Project Name: Contractor Company Name: Contractor Address: Construction Start Date: Adams Run -boHM4 MA P.O. Box 968, Cardiff By The Sea, California 92007 02/08/01 Description of Work: I description of work Work Now In Progress: Work Planned for Next 12 Months: 4 Lot Subdivision Completion Date: 12/01/01 work mils"r M C &bn►Vl`% CLIO% 11"A Private Road Grading, Utilities Trenching, BMP's, Grading, Erosion Control, Road Improvements, Drainage etc.. work planned Erosion Control, Maintain BMP's "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information submitted is, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." Contractor Signature: -7===� Dater _ 1 1 —01 LTCattrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPP(WPCP Preparation Manual Annual Certification of Compliance November 2000 t of 2 � Attachment ! Annual Certification of Compliance Approval by the Resident Engineer for the Annual Certification of Compliance Resident Engineer's Findings I, and/or personnel acting under my direction and supervision, have inspected the project site and the work described above and find as follows: 1. ❑ YES ❑ NO Storm water pollution control measures are being implemented in accordance with the SWPPP approved for the project. 2. ❑ YES ❑ NO The project site and activities thereon are in compliance with the Caltrans Statewide NPDES Permit No. CAS000003, the NPDES General Permit No. CAS000002, or local NPDES permits, which ever is applicable. When both I and 2 above are checked "yes ", the resident engineer must complete the annual certification below. If either 1 or 2 above are checked "no ", the resident engineer must: • File a notice of non-compliance within 30 days of identification of the noncompliance; • Document follow up actions below; • Notifv the contractor; and • Initiate corrective actions in accordance with the contract. Resident Engineer's Follow up Actions: I certify tinder penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared tinder my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that quaked personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Resident Engineer's Name and Signature atCattrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPP(WPCP Preparation Manual �v November 2000 Date Annual Certification of Compliance 2 of Attachment J Notice of Discharge, Written Notice, or Order To Wayne A. Pasco Date: Insert Date Subject: Notice of Discharge Name: Adams Run In accordance with the Caltrans NPDES Statewide Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity, the following instance of discharge is noted: Date, time, and location of discharge Insert description and date of event Nature of the operation that caused the discharge insert description of operation Initial assessment of any impact cause by the discharge insert assessment Existing BlIll in place prior to discharge event list BMPs in place Date of deployment and type of BMPs deployed after the discharge. BMPs deployed after the discharge (with dates) Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate and /or prevent recurrence of the discharge insert steps taken to prevent recurrence Implementation and maintenance schedule for any affected BMPs insert implementation and maintenance schedule Callrans Storm Water Duality Handbooks SWPPPNJPCP Preparation Manual Notice of Discharge November 2000 1 of 2 abs r Attachment J Notice of Non- Compiance - Sample If further information or a modification to the above schedule is required, notify the contact person below. Name of Contact Person Company Signature Coltrane Storm Water Quality Handbooks SWPPPNAPCP Preparation Manual Aff A110601011F November 2000 Title Telephone Number Date Notice of Discharge 2of2 HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN PREPARED FOR: BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PO BOX 270649 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92198 -0649 (858) 613 -2990 PREPARED BY: W.A. PASCO ENGINEERING 535 N. HIGHWAY 101 SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CALIF. 92075 (858) 259 -8212 DECEMBER 29, 1999 REVISED JUNE 9, 2000 PE 786F TABLE OF CONTENTS • SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION & DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION • SECTION 2 SITE HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS • SECTION 3 DRAINAGE CHANNEL HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS • SECTION 4 CURB OUTLET SIZING CALCULATIONS • SECTION 5 REFERENCE DATA & CHARTS • SECTION 6 DRAINAGE & NODE MAPS SECTION 1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION/DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION & DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION THE PROJECT SHOWN HEREIN INCLUDES A 4 LOT RESIDENTIAL PARCEL MAP WHICH INCLUDES HOUSE PAD GRADING & RECREATIONAL PAD GRADING FOR TENNIS COURTS, POOLS, HORSE RINK, ETC. THE ACCESS TO THE 4 PARCELS WILL BE ALONG A PRIVATE ASPHALT ROADWAY, USING CONCRETE ROLLED CURB ON BOTH SIDES. ALL PROPOSED DRAINAGE IS TO BE HANDLED AS SURFACE FLOW, WITH THE ONLY EXCEPTION BEING A TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL 4. THE EASTERLY LIMIT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NEAR A SMALL NATURAL RIDGE LINE. BECAUSE OF THIS, VERY LITTLE NATURAL DRAINAGE FLOWS ONTO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. ALL SITE DRAINAGE QUANTITIES HAVE BEEN CALCULATED USING THE SAN DIEGO FLOOD CONTROL DATA FOR 100 YEAR STORM FREQUENCY. THE SOIL TYPE WAS DETERMINED USING THE SAN DIEGO AREA SOIL SURVEY MAPS (SOIL TYPE "D'j. THE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT OF 0.45 WAS DETERMINED BASED ON THE SOIL TYPE (D), AND THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPED LOT SIZES OF THE AREA (1/2 ACRE OR MORE). SECTION 2 SITE HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS fraa + +ffffaar +rr + +ra of aarfrrrfa+a+ rat +arfaa + +ara +ar + + +r + + +a + +a + +a RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE Reference: SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1985,1981 HYDROLOGY MANUAL (c) Copyright 1982 -92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 1.3A Release Date: 3/06/92 License ID 1386 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 North Hwy. 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA. 92075 Ph. 858 - 259 -8212 Fax: 858- 259 -4812 +++ + + ++ + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + ++ ++ DESCRIPTION OF STUDY * * * * * * +afr +af raf•aaaa * * * ** * TPM 98 -272 Adams Run Hydrology - PC M1 Corrections * 6 -9 -2000 ' * See Hydrology noe maps in foldout area of this report. ++++++++ r+ f+++ af+ f+ ratr+ arf+ f+ rffff++++ rffffffff + + + + + +ata + +ffafaaaaaaaaafa FILE NAME: 786A.DAT TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 10:43 6/ 9/2000 - -- -- -- --- - - -- --------------------------------------------------- USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1985 SAN DIEGO MANUAL CRITERIA USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00 6 -HOUR DURATION PRECIPITATION (INCHES) - 3.600 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 6.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE _ .95 SAN DIEGO HYDROLOGY MANUAL "C "- VALUES USED NOTE: CONSIDER ALL CONFLUENCE STREAM COMBINATIONS FOR ALL DOWNSTREAM ANALYSES + + +raf ar +ff + +a ++•aatar+at + +trf a+ r+ t++ a+ a++ trfaar + + ++ +a +t + + + + + + +fa + + + ++ + + +a +r FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 43.00 TO NODE 41.00 IS CODE 21 » »> RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS« «< aSOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 270.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 494.30 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 487.60 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 6.70 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 14.201 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 4.838 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .44 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .20 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .44 aaarr* afa++ i+ r+ rrf++++ rrfa*+ i++ aaar+ r#+ a+##*w tf + + + + +aa + +raaarraaaf + + + +a + ++ +a FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 41.00 TO NODE 21.00 IS CODE = 51 » »> COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW««< »» >TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA« «< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 487.60 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 483.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 11.00 CHANNEL SLOPE _ .4182 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) _ .30 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = .015 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) _ .70 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) _ .44 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) = 10.28 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .09 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .02 TC(MIN.) = 14.22 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 41.00 TO NODE 21.00 IS CODE 1 ------------------------- »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE ««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 14.22 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 4.83 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .20 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .44 ++ +r *rfa + +rrrf r+ rrraa +i + +raf + +arra + # ++ + +arr + + + * *f af+k+ +ia +aarraaa +a + **waa +++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 42.00 TO NODE 21.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION =IS "D" _ RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 95.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION - 490.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION - 483.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 7.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF PLOW(MINUTES) = 5.861 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 8.561 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .23 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .06 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .23 a + *aa+ia #i+ #f+ rrr+*+ t+ araiawii + + + *aa + + +afaf+ +ita# +aaaf rrr ++aaf a #aaawwaaaawww FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 42.00 TO NODE 21.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE ««< » » >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< = TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 5.86 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 8.56 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .06 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .23 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 .44 14.22 4.834 .20 2 .23 5.86 8.561 .06 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF NUMBER (CFS) 1 .48 2 .57 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ Tc INTENSITY (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 5.86 8.561 14.22 4.834 ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: .57 Tc(MIN.) = 14.22 .26 Y +i + + + +a + +*++i + +ii #f if# tit #itAtit#fk# *f +tt+ *#if ifti * * *tt * #t #f ii##itfff#f # #tt FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 21.00 TO NODE 26.00 IS CODE = 6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >COMPUTE STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 483.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION 428.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 575.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6. STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 16.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK = 1.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 ** TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 1.14 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .20 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 3.77 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 4.40 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = .89 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MIN) = 2.18 TC(MIN) = 16.40 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 4.409 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .58 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.15 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) _ .84 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.72 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) _ .22 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 4.67 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 5.10 DEPTH *VELOCITY = 1.12 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) 1 2.37 7.60 2 1.72 16.38 NEW PEAK FLOW DATA ARE: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 2.37 Tc(MIN.) = 7.60 ++* aaa++ tf# ar# r* a***+ i+ sratara+ aa* a + +aaaai +tta #aar♦ * * *a +a *aa + #rrf t +tzar *rra« FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 21.00 TO NODE 26.00 IS CODE - 10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>MAIN- STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 1 ««< i+tiii «tff *a #t +ar+ait « * *a ** anti ♦tf atarairtf** aati +fi #tira #raa ### * *fa ++ #i +it+ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 22.00 IS CODE - 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL = CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 155.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 475.50 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 468.10 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 7.40 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 8.651 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) - 6.660 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .63 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .21 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .63 *rat* ass++ aas+# fa* taf+ a# a+a+ rt# ar t++ riraa+* raa + + + + + +« « + +ra « +s # + + + +iaaa +t « *at FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 22.00 TO NODE 24.00 IS CODE = 51 »» >COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW««< » » >TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 468.10 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION 445.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 215.00 CHANNEL SLOPE _ .1074 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) _ .30 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = .015 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) _ .50 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) _ .63 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) - 6.63 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .16 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .54 TC(MIN.) = 9.19 tt #araataiiarrraaaf a►arrrtaa *af ar aof rrararaaair ar «iraaat +aia +rrrra *attiarttt FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 22.00 TO NODE 24.00 IS CODE 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE« «< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.19 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 6.40 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .21 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .63 tfa+* rw* w+++ aa++ ttrrratwww** w+ a+ aairri+ r+ aaat * + +waaa +aaa # + + #r + +xr +a + +r + + + + +i FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 18.00 TO NODE 23.00 IS CODE = 21 » »>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS ««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 260.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 470.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 448.60 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 21.40 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 9.345 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.337 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .77 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .27 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .77 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 23.00 TO NODE 24.00 IS CODE 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< » » >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.34 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 6.34 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .27 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .77 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 .63 9.19 6.404 .21 2 .77 9.34 6.337 .27 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 1.39 9.19 6.404 2 1.39 9.34 6.337 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) 1.39 TC(MIN.) = 9.34 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - .48 art +tt + + + +at + +rrtr ++ +waa trt+ r+ tt++ t+ a++++++++ + +rr +tr +wrtt +t + + + + + + +a + +a + + + + ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 24.00 TO NODE 26.00 IS CODE = 11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »> CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK A 1 WITH THE MAIN- STREAM MEMORY « «< ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 1.39 9.19 6.404 .48 2 1.39 9.34 6.337 .48 ** MEMORY BANK $ 1 CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 2.37 7.60 7.238 .84 2 1.72 16.38 4.412 .84 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 3.60 7.60 7.238 2 3.48 9.19 6.404 3 3.46 9.34 6.337 4 2.69 16.36 4.412 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.60 Tc(MIN.) = 7.60 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.32 aatt+ taataaxxaaaaattt+ atttaattxt+ ttaaaaxat+ taaaxaxaxttt +at +a + + +aattaxxxxxxxa FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 26.00 TO NODE 27.00 IS CODE = 6 »» >COMPUTE STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 428.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 425.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 80.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6. STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 20.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK = 1.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 * *TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 3.64 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .30 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 8.73 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) - 4.14 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = 1.25 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MIN) _ .32 TC(MIN) = 7.92 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) - 7.047 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .03 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .10 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) = 1.35 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.69 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = .30 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 8.73 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 4.20 DEPTH *VELOCITY = 1.26 + +r +} } * *a+ + +ar sx +aa + +s + +w +ws *sr *xaxaa *ir+ax aw #ara + +xx +aw + # *i + +a#a +a + +r + + +xxx FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 26.00 TO NODE 27.00 IS CODE = 1 » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS == 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.92 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 7.05 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.35 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 3.69 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 25.00 TO NODE 27.00 IS CODE - 21 »» >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH - 245.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 450.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 425.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 25.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 8.444 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.765 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .36 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) 1.10 aaaaa+ sar++++ r#* a++**} r#*# w++ w++ asw++ a++++ xxwwaw +xaxxwwa *arrxrrr +ra +* + + # +x *a FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 25.00 TO NODE 27.00 IS CODE 1 »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< »»>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 8.44 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 6.76 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = .36 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 1.10 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 3.69 7.92 7.047 1.35 1 3.57 9.52 6.259 1.35 1 3.55 9.68 6.195 1.35 1 2.75 16.72 4.355 1.35 2 1.10 8.44 6.765 .36 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 4.74 7.92 7.047 2 4.64 8.44 6.765 3 4.58 9.52 6.259 4 4.55 9.68 6.195 5 3.45 16.72 4.355 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.74 Tc(MIN.) ° 7.92 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.71 a+ far ra+ rt+ r**** ra*+**** rr** r*++*+ r* arrftarraarfff * *rafft *arara +rrf :rf trt + *a FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 155.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 479.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 468.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 11.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 1.749 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 5- MINUSES 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 9.485 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) .90 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .10 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .90 * ***a *r* *r* **f*r**f** **if r**** *r a+ ***tart *tar a * +f f f r* *fa ** * **** * * * ** * * ** * * ** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE - 1 » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 5.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 9.49 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .10 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .90 r*******t*****+** a********* t***rrt******* f* t* ** * **a *t*r * * *** ** * * * *** * ** * * *** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE = 21 »» >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 160.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 475.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 468.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE - 7.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 9.049 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.469 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .93 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .32 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .93 ++++ wwrwtwrr+ t++++# rw#+ r#++ rt+ w+ wrww+++# ar+++ +a +arrw + #w # #rr + +atawaaaaat # +a ## FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE = 1 » » >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< »»>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.05 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 6.47 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .32 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .93 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 .90 5.00 9.485 .10 2 .93 9.05 6.469 .32 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 1.54 5.00 9.485 2 1.55 9.05 6.469 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.55 Tc(MIN.) 9.05 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .42 + aaawr# a+ w### rar# rwwww+++ ara# aww## a++ aaaaawwr # +aawaawwww # #atawaaaawawwwaaaws FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE 6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »> COMPUTE STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 468.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION 457.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 160.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6. STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 12.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK = 1.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 * *TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 1.93 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .24 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 5.77 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) - 4.28 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = 1.03 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MIN) = .62 TC(MIN) = 9.67 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.197 *USER SPECIFIED(SUBAREA): RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .19 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .77 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) _ .61 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) 2.31 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = .25 RALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 6.42 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 4.36 DEPTH *VELOCITY = 1.11 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) 1 2.63 5.58 2 2.31 9.67 NEW PEAK FLOW DATA ARE: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.63 Tc(MIN.) = 5.58 ***i*** x*ixx* xi** if********i**********x****** ****** ** *** **x *i** * *x**** * * * * *i FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 5.58 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 8.84 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = .61 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 2.63 + ++ *a #ir + # * + #aaa*irfx *xf xx * * * + *rxa*iA + +aaa*s +*r*af xrfiaa #i #rs * #**•++ + + + * #+ +* FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< --------------- - - -- SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH - 190.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 462.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 457.D0 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 5.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) 11.682 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 5.487 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .57 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .23 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .57 in +++ +rift # +a +rat tf atilt* it + #at + + + +iiar +r +rtriaa #a # #ra #r lktt * ♦ +a *a +ai + + +ia# FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE 1 ----------------------- »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< »» >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES« «< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 11.68 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 5.49 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .23 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .57 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 2.63 5.58 8.840 .61 1 2.31 9.67 6.198 .61 2 .57 11.68 5.487 .23 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 2.98 5.58 8.840 2 2.81 9.67 6.198 3 2.61 11.68 5.487 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.98 Tc(MIN.) = 5.58 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .84 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE ------------------------- » »> COMPUTE STREETFLOW UPSTREAM ELEVATION = STREET LENGTH(FEET) _ STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) �+• ar+ r+++ r+ ara + # + +++++ : + + + + +r + +r+ra+r + + + ++ +rrr +a++ 4.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE 6 -------------------------------------------------- TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA« «< 457.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 448.10 125.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) 6. = 12.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK = 1.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF - 1 **TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 3.36 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .27 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 7.08 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 5.43 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = 1.45 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MIN) _ .38 TC(MIN) = 5.96 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 8.469 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .20 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .76 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) = 1.04 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.74 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) _ .28 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 7.73 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 5.23 DEPTH *VELOCITY = 1.47 ++++++++++ rrrra+ t+++++ xxw++ +tarr +a + + + + + + +xx + + +r + + + + + + + + +xa a +xff *x +aa + + #a +t ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 4.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 5.96 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 8.47 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 1.04 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 3.74 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE 21 »» >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 180.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 459.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 448.10 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 10.90 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 8.613 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION, EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.679 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .78 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .26 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .78 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = 1 »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 8.61 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 6.68 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .26 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .78 ## rt++ xxrr+#++ rt♦++++ tt+ x+ rr# r+ r++ rrr++++ taa* t + + +w +xr + + +t + + +rixraa # # # # # +a # ## FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 120.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 460.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 448.60 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 11.40 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) 6.052 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.386 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .75 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .20 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .75 a4ikiiaa#a * * *t #a +ai++ri#ttf tf * * *# # +ilaf iraa#aa *af * *f #aalialaaa #af tfaftf a * * #* FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 19.00 IS CODE 1 » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE« «< » » >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 3 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 6.05 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 8.39 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .20 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .75 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 3.74 5.96 8.469 1.04 1 3.36 10.09 6.031 1.04 1 3.10 12.13 5.354 1.04 2 .78 8.61 6.679 .26 3 .75 6.05 8.386 .20 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 3 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 5.11 5.96 8.469 2 5.08 6.05 8.386 3 4.41 4 4.61 5 4.20 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ 8.61 6.679 10.09 6.031 12.13 5.354 ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: 5.11 Tc(MIN.) 5.96 1.50 t++ t+# ra+## x#+ ts++t++ atsst+ twxw+ xs>#+ t+ ss»++ +rr #+rs + +wxsxw >ww +x +wx +xxx +x + ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.00 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE 6 ---------- -- ------ -- ------- -------- --- --- -------------------------------- »» >COMPUTE STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 448.60 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 434.80 STREET LENGTH(FEET) 193.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6. STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 12.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK = 1.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 * *TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 5.75 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .31 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 9.05 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) - 6.14 PRODUCT OF DEPTH&VELOCITY = 1.89 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MIN) _ .52 TC(MIN) = 6.48 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 8.021 *USER SPECIFIED(SUBAREA): RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6700 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .24 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) 1.29 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) = 1.74 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 6.40 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) _ .32 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 9.70 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 6.04 DEPTH *VELOCITY = 1.93 +s > + + +ra » r + + + + + + + + + >r ++ + ++ + + +> ++ rrrr+++++++ rr +xxarrrr + + + ++ + +rrr +srx # + + +w + ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE = 51 »»>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW««< »»>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 432.30 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 427.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 85.00 CHANNEL SLOPE _ .0624 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = 5.00 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = .300 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 1.50 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 6.40 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) _ .98 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .94 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.44 TC(MIN.) = 7.92 + #i + +trxxx #t + +a +a # #i +trrr +rxxrwf t# rrrxrxrx+++ +t + #xxraxww #xff #rirkrrrrrr +MrMr FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.92 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 7.05 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.74 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 6.40 xrr+++++ rrrr# rwtrrrx+++ rrrrrxwwwrrsrrrrt + + + + +rwrwrrttrrxrrra +x +♦ +wrsw rrrrt +r FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE = 21 » » >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 115.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION - 432.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 427.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 5.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 7.688 'CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 7.187 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .58 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .18 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .58 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 9.00 IS CODE = 1 »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< »»>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.69 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) - 7.19 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = .18 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .58 +f CONFLUENCE DATA " STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 6.40 7.92 7.048 1.74 1 6.36 8.03 6.990 1.74 1 5.44 10.74 5.793 1.74 1 5.54 12.19 5.338 1.74 1 5.04 14.26 4.826 1.74 2 .58 7.69 7.187 .18 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. " PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 6.86 7.69 7.187 2 6.97 7.92 7.048 3 6.93 8.03 6.990 4 5.91 10.74 5.793 5 5.97 12.19 5.338 6 5.43 14.26 4.826 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.97 Tc(MIN.) = 7.92 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.92 + +arrrrxxxxirtra + +a+ rarer+ xxxrrrrar++ a++ a+ arraaxxxxir +araar + +a + +ar + +rarwiria FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 9.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE 51 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW « «< »» >TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 427.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 418.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 90.00 CHANNEL SLOPE _ .1000 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = 5.00 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = .300 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 1.50 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 6.97 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) = 1.18 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .87 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - 1.27 TC(MIN.) - 9.19 }ia #if lr rfaaar * * *ttirirrfa # *f * * *ata # # #f ffifi### *} * ** }iii ###tif}itw * *r * * *a #at FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 9.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE = 1 » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.19 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 6.41 _ TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.92 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 6.97 +yrrrx +t +ia +i++rrr * *iaa tai+ fffik#} r*+ taatrrifaar #itaakiiaairi +arrta#*r * * * * #a FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 13.00 IS CODE = 21 ------------------- --- ----- ---- --- -- ------- - -- - - --- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 243.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 432.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 418.70 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 13.30 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 10.350 `CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 5.933 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .88 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .33 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .88 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 13.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE = 51 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW««< »» >TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION 418.70 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 418.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 9.00 CHANNEL SLOPE _ .0778 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = 1.00 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = .300 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) - 1.00 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) _ .8B FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) _ .68 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .59 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .22 TC(MIN.) = 10.57 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 13.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE 1 »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 10.57 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 5.85 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .33 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .88 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 150.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 435.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 418.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 17.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 6.380 +CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 8.105 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .47 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - .13 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .47 a+ aar+ r+++ ixraa+* r+ ri+ ri+ ixii++ a+ i+ rrr+ a+ r++ xxw + +xkaxrarwrra+ + # ## * * * # #r # *ir* FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< » »>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES« «< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 3 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 6.38 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 8.11 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .13 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .47 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 6.86 8.96 6.510 1.92 1 6.97 9.19 6.405 1.92 1 6.93 9.29 6.361 1.92 1 5.91 12.07 5.372 1.92 1 5.97 13.52 4.995 1.92 1 5.43 15.62 4.549 1.92 2 .88 10.57 5.853 .33 3 .47 6.38 8.105 .13 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 3 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF NUMBER (CFS) 1 6.62 2 8.03 3 8.15 4 8.11 5 7.60 6 7.03 7 7.02 8 6.38 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ Tc INTENSITY (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 6.38 6.105 8.96 6.510 9.19 6.405 9.29 6.361 10.57 5.853 12.07 5.372 13.52 4.995 15.62 4.549 ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: 8.15 Tc(MIN.) 9.19 2.38 # r####### rr+ rrx++ i# r#*+* rtattrrrrr+ w+ aa+ r+ x# tt +waa *+aaaa + ++ + + +ta +rar #r # +r # #r FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 11.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE - 51 » »> COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW««< »»>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< _......... UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 418.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 405.50 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 125.00 CHANNEL SLOPE _ .1000 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) - 5.00 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR - .300 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) - 1.50 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 8.15 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) - 1.24 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) _ .95 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - 1.67 TC(MIN.) = 10.86 ++++++++ a++++ ft+ i+ rait## awrwwwf+} w+ wraaw+ s+ a+ + + + + +atfftar #r +rr #ti #i +tf + +r :aa FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 11.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 10.86 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 5.75 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.38 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 8.15 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 16.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 21 »» >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 135.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 420.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 405.50 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 14.50 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 6.162 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 8.289 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .60 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .16 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .60 } iii }fi if afiiffifitf++ iii+ ifiti# f} ii+ ii} iia} i+ rai# ai#r #i+}+t ** * *a +i4fiiaiifi+iiii FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 16.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 1 »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 6.16 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 8.29 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = .16 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .60 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE 21 » »>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW - LENGTH = 255.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION - 450.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 405.50 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 44.50 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 7.204 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 7.495 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.06 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .61 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.06 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< »»>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 3 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 3 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 7.20 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 7.49 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .61 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 2.06 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 6.62 8.16 6.917 2.38 1 8.03 10.64 5.627 2.38 1 8.15 10.86 5.750 2.38 1 8.11 10.97 5.714 2.38 1 7.60 12.28 5.314 2.38 1 7.03 13.82 4.923 2.38 1 7.02 15.27 4.617 2.38 1 6.38 17.42 4.240 2.38 2 .60 6.16 8.289 .16 3 2.06 7.20 7.495 .61 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 3 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 8.11 6.16 8.289 2 8.85 7.20 7.495 3 9.01 8.16 6.917 4 10.05 10.64 5.827 5 10.14 10.86 5.750 6 10.09 10.97 5.714 7 9.44 12.28 5.314 6 8.74 13.82 4.923 9 8.62 15.27 4.617 10 7.85 17.42 4.240 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 10.14 Tc(MIN.) = 10.86 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.15 tt + + + * *w #x + #r # *tfrif #a# tit +iti + *f ++aiixwxx * # *frf of ifaalf of iaa # #a##a * *ff *f #aa FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 17.00 IS CODE = 51 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW««< »» >TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION 405.50 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 404.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 50.00 CHANNEL SLOPE _ .0300 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) - 5.00 "Z" FACTOR = 2.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = .300 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 2.00 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 10.14 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) _ .86 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) - 1.48 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .96 TC(MIN.) - 11.83 a# a+ i+ t+ ss+ rwiw+ aa# aaa# fi#### r+ as a +afsafar #ataaaa #a # # #saai # #aaaf s#aaa # +aa #s+ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 17.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 11.83 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 5.44 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 3.15 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 10.14 f ## + # # # +f +wwtttfffarf t # # + #iiifwrxfx #t #f iaf #a #ti # # # ## #+i #tria #f iffaww #w #wxtit FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 17.00 IS CODE 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 315.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 458.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 404.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 54.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 8.054 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.974 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.01 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .64 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) 2.01 itr# a*# raataaa## aaa toas#♦ aaxa #sf +i +t + #tt #r + ## #iraafaa #aaiif #ataaaaaf aaa sa :a# FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 31.00 TO NODE 17.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE ««< » »>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 8.05 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 6.97 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) _ .64 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 2.01 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 8.11 7.19 7.506 3.15 1 8.85 8.20 6.892 3.15 1 9.01 9.15 6.422 3.15 1 10.05 11.61 5.509 3.15 1 10.14 11.83 5.443 3.15 1 10.09 11.93 5.412 3.15 1 9.44 13.26 5.056 3.15 1 8.74 14.82 4.706 3.15 1 8.62 16.28 4.430 3.15 1 7.85 18.46 4.085 3.15 2 2.01 8.05 6.974 .64 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE •* STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 9.97 7.19 7.506 2 10.75 8.05 6.974 3 10.83 8.20 6.892 4 10.86 9.15 6.422 5 11.63 11.61 5.509 6 11.71 11.83 5.443 7 11.65 11.93 5.412 8 10.89 13.26 5.056 9 10.09 14.82 4.706 10 9.89 16.28 4.430 11 9.03 18.46 4.085 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 11.71 Tc(MIN.) = 11.83 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.79 + + +rra * #a##+ +i + ##rf #a*t iii #ati * *ffa #affaataffaaa * *ffaf aff #a4f +fffaa # #f aaaaaa FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 38.00 TO NODE 39.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 100.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 427.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 418.70 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 8.30 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 5.779 +CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 8.639 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .74 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .19 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .74 rr +f xxw+ a* w*+f+ iaxxrf*+* t* x* w#* xtta+ atti+*++ irarr +rr + + + +xtrwixwxx +w *rfxxwrr+ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 16.00 TO NODE 40.00 IS CODE - 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< --------------- -- SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 175.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION - 420.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 408.40 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 11.60 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 8.240 +CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.872 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .56 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .18 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .56 ++++++++ a+ t++ a+++++ rrr+ x** rraa+ a+ + + + + + + +• +r +r + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ +rant + + + + + ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 33.00 TO NODE 34.00 IS CODE a 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS« «< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 85.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 450.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 436.80 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 13.20 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 4.324 +CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 5-MINUTES 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 9.485 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .47 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .11 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .47 +***+#+#+***++++++*** fx *f ** * #x +tfff +r+* #xiffA ** *iiaii tf xf * #ii #f iii * **►**** ** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 35.00 TO NODE 36.00 IS CODE 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< --- --------- - - - - -- - - --- - - - - - -- - SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 110.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 458.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 440.50 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 17.50 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 4.879 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 5- MINUTES 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 9.485 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .68 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .16 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .68 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 35.00 TO NODE 37.00 IS CODE = 21 »»>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 120.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 458.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 440.90 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 17.10 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 5.287 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 9.150 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .62 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .15 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .62 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 28.00 TO NODE 29.00 IS CODE - 21 » » >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< *USER SPECIFIED(SUBAREA): RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9000 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW - LENGTH = 125.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 471.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 455.90 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 15.10 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 1.754 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 5- MINUTES 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 9.485 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .60 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .07 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .60 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 28.00 TO NODE 29.00 IS CODE 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 5.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 9.49 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = .07 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .60 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 29.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS ««< ----------------- - -- - - -- SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 190.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 462.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 455.90 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 6.10 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 10.933 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 5.727 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .90 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .35 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .90 x # * ###txirr# air** xii## i+ i* r# t# ia*** i## ii# ait ii + # # #aa # *xir *i *#iw #iaaaaaaatiri FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.00 TO NODE 29.00 IS CODE 1 »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE ««< » »>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES ««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 10.93 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 5.73 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = .35 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE _ .90 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 .60 5.00 9.485 .07 2 .90 10.93 5.727 .35 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 1.14 5.00 9.485 2 1.26 10.93 5.727 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 1.26 Tc(MIN.) = 10.93 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .42 END OF STUDY SUMMARY: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) 1.26 Tc(MIN.) = 10.93 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .42 * ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE • ** Q(CFS) Tc(MIN.) 1 1.14 5.00 2 1.26 10.93 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS +r rrra r++ r+ r+ a+++ a+++ rtr++ r++++++++ r+ r+ r++++ rrrrr ++ + + +r+r + + + + +r + +a+aaaaaaaaa RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE Reference: SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1985,1981 HYDROLOGY MANUAL (c) Copyright 1982 -92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 1.3A Release Date: 3/06/92 License ID 1386 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 North Hwy. 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA. 92075 Ph. 858- 259 -8212 Fax: 858- 259 -4812 art + #ara +t + + + + + +aa +ta+a +r+ DESCRIPTION OF STUDY * * * * * + +t :arraraaarrrrr rrrr • Hydrology Calculations for Double 30" RCP culvert • on Fortuna Ranch Rd. Sta. 1 +68 • See Exhibit "B" Node 102 6 -9 -2000 ms taaa###*#** ia##*+ rtar*####*# aia# i #+iarlaf ###t #i * # *aaiait # # #r#r #i #ia#araaat FILE NAME: 786LARET.DAT TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 9:51 6/ 9/2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------- USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1985 SAN DIEGO MANUAL CRITERIA USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00 6 -HOUR DURATION PRECIPITATION (INCHES) = 3.600 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 6.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE _ .95 SAN DIEGO HYDROLOGY MANUAL "C "- VALUES USED NOTE: ONLY PEAK CONFLUENCE VALUES CONSIDERED +aaaaf aaraaattwaatar++ a+# a### t# a# aaarrraara rrr #rrrr #raraararaaararaaarr #aarr FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 21 »»> RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< -------------------- -- - --- SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 NATURAL WATERSHED NOMOGRAPH TIME OF CONCENTRATION WITH 10- MINUTES ADDED = 12.92(MINUTES) INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH - 760.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 498.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 407.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 91.00 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 5.141 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 23.37 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 10.10 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 23.37 + + +aaarr + +ar#rra + +r #rrf t # #f #tt#ffarrrffittt # *iff i #tt # +af trsffit #t +iiitt # # # ## FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 102.00 IS CODE 53 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >COMPUTE NATURAL MOUNTAIN CHANNEL FLOW««< »»>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 407.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION 360.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) - 1070.00 CHANNEL SLOPE = .0439 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 23.37 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) = 3.35 (PER PLATE D -6.3) TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 5.32 TC(MIN.) = 18.24 r +rwrrfrr +taaarrf rf#####t+ aa# to # # # # # # # #fraaa # # #r + # # # # # ## + #ar rrr + +aaa +a + + + +a+ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 102.00 IS CODE = 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW««< 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 4.116 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 23.45 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 43.43 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 33.55 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) 66.80 TC(MIN) = 18.24 END =OF =STUDY SUMMARY: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 66.80 Tc(MIN.) = 18.24 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 33.55 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS SECTION 3 PROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNEL HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS - I PROGRAM PACKAGE (C) Copyright 1982-92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 3.1A Release Date: 2/17/92 License ID 1388 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 North Hwy. 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA. 92075 Ph. 858- 259 -8212 Fax: 858- 259 -4812 TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 9:23 9/ 5/2000 + +r #ri+ + * #ar + ##•rr +i #aa+i♦ DESCRIPTION OF STUDY * Check Cahnnel Capacity and Velocity from node 8 to 9 * PE 786f ' * 100 year storm " r See Drainage Area Map. * 9 -5 -2000 ms ' i+*: rir** ia++ wri+** aai+* raii+* wwiww+ ri+++ ww* wwwiiri * +ir # + # * #rrri+i * *wiw * +r +r » »CHANNEL INPUT INFORMATION «« CHANNEL Z1(HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) = 2.00 Z2(HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) = 5.00 BASEWIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 CONSTANT CHANNEL SLOPE(FEET /FEET) _ .081000 UNIFORM FLOW(CFS) = 6.97 MANNINGS FRICTION FACTOR = .0350 NORMAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»> NORMAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .27 FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 6.86 FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 1.57 HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .23 FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 4.43 UNIFORM FROUDE NUMBER = 1.632 PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 72.22 AVERAGED VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .305 SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .571 CRITICAL-DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 7.51 CRITICAL FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) 2.24 CRITICAL FLOW HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) .30 CRITICAL FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 3.11 CRITICAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .36 CRITICAL FLOW PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 65.39 AVERAGED CRITICAL FLOW VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .150 CRITICAL FLOW SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .509 +riiaa +t * *i iw ++iawiw * + + + ++ DESCRIPTION OF STUDY * * * *a * * + * + + +•wa *wa + +♦ + +wwa * Check channel capacity and velocity from node 9 to 11 * PE 786 * 100 Year storm * ' * See drainage area map * 9 -5 -2000 ms + ai + + + + ++ +#+tart * *a +ta + +ti +ilra+ + # +* **watt +a*•f a +f ** ** + + + + + # #++ +aaaf aaa * * *i ** #a #ataw *iwiwa # #tiiiwwiw #iiaaa+# iii+ iii* +w * *iw*iiiiiiii +iii++ * *w #i **i *twiif »»CHANNEL INPUT INFORMATION «« --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL Z1(H0RIZONTAL /VERTICAL) = 2.00 Z2(H0RIZONTAL /VERTICAL) = 5.00 BASEWIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 CONSTANT CHANNEL SLOPE(FEET /FEET) _ .165500 UNIFORM FLOW(CFS) = 6.97 MANNINGS FRICTION FACTOR = .0350 --------------- - NORMAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: »»> NORMAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .22 FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 6.51 FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 1.24 HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .19 FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 5.62 UNIFORM FROUDE NUMBER = 2.269 PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 83.88 AVERAGED VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .490 SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .706 CRITICAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: CRITICAL FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 7.51 CRITICAL FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 2.24 CRITICAL FLOW HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .30 CRITICAL FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 3.11 CRITICAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .36 CRITICAL FLOW PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 65.39 AVERAGED CRITICAL FLOW VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .150 CRITICAL FLOW SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .509 DESCRIPTION OF STUDY * Check Channel capacity and velocity from node 11 to 14 * PE 786f * 100 Year storm r r * See drainage area map. * 9 -5 -2000 ms 4rrt */ raa+ r+ r /iraa ; #; tit# rrrr/ raar#+// raarrr #/ /aaa4 ++ ++ ++ * * # * + #** + *r*aa*fa * 44*}; 4/ ra+; ir* Aaa# 4# t* 4ai * * * * * * * ;i;4#* /a +;;i *4 * ; }}♦4 #4 ii * ■4*4 *** ►**** * ** * #} » »CHANNEL INPUT INFORMATION«« ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL Z1(HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) - 2.00 Z2(HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) - 5.00 BASENIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 CONSTANT CHANNEL SLOPE(FEET /FEET) _ .141700 UNIFORM FLOW(CFS) = 8.15 MANNINGS FRICTION FACTOR = .0350 --------------- -- - - -- NORMAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»> NORMAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .25 FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 6.72 FLOW AREA(SOUARE FEET) = 1.44 HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .21 FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 5.65 UNIFORM FROUDE NUMBER = 2.150 PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 99.79 AVERAGED VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .496 SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .742 --------------- -- -- CRITICAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: CRITICAL FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 7.76 CRITICAL FLOW AREA(SOUARE FEET) = 2.52 CRITICAL FLOW HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .32 CRITICAL FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) - 3.24 CRITICAL DEPTH(FEET) = .39 CRITICAL FLOW PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 79.88 AVERAGED CRITICAL FLOW VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .163 CRITICAL FLOW SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .557 ararrr+rtrrraarararri +► ►at DESCRIPTION OF STUDY * * *sa :rrr+tata ► ►aaaaaaataa * check channel capacity and velocity from node 14 to 17 * PE 786f * 100 Year storm * a * See drainage area map * 9 -5 -2000 ms rrtaarataatt+ ataatraaartaaaaaaaaaa+ rrararaatataaartaetaa +arrar►a ►taraaataa as ►taaaaaar +rrat ►a ataaa++ arrrrraara+ ataaa+ r+ aarrr ••rtataaaaaaraaaaa +tarrrrr+ »»CHANNEL INPUT INFORMATION«« ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHANNEL Z1(HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) - 2.00 Z2(HORIZONTAL /VERTICAL) - 5.00 BASENIDTH(FEET) - 5.00 CONSTANT CHANNEL SLOPE(FEET /FEET) _ .067700 UNIFORM FLOW(CFS) - 10.14 MANNINGS FRICTION FACTOR = .0350 ---------------- - - - --- NORMAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: » »> NORMAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .34 FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 7.39 FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 2.12 HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .29 FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 4.79 UNIFORM FROUDE NUMBER - 1.579 PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 115.29 AVERAGED VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .357 SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .698 = CRITICAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 8.16 CRITICAL FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 2.97 CRITICAL FLOW HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) _ .36 CRITICAL FLOW AVERAGE VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 3.41 CRITICAL DEPTH(FEET) _ .45 CRITICAL FLOW PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 105.57 AVERAGED CRITICAL FLOW VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) _ .181 CRITICAL FLOW SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) _ .632 I -10 TABLE I -7 (Continued) 1 Construction Good Fair b. Earth fairly uniform section (1) No vegetation 0.022 0.025 (2) Grass, some weeds 0.025 0.030 (3) Dense weeds or aquatic plants in deep channels 0.030 0.035 (4) Sides clean gravel bottom 0.025 0.030 (5) Sides clean, cobble bottom 0.030 0.040 c. Dragline excavated or dredged (1) No vegetation (2) Light brush on banks 0.028 0.033 0.035 0.050 e. Channels not maintained, weeds and brush uncut (1) Dense weeds, high as flow depth 0.08 0.12 (2) Clean bottom, brush on sides 0.05 0.08 (3) Same, highest stage of flow 0.07 0.11 (4) Dense brush, high stage 0.10 0.14 08 NATURAL STREAM CBANNELS5 a. Minor streams 0(surface width at flood stage, 100 ft) (1) Fairly regular section (a) Some grass and weeds, little or no brush (b) Dense growth of weeds, depth of flow materially greater than weed height (c) Some weeds, light brush on banks (d) Some weeds, heavy brush on banks (e) For trees within channel with branches submerged at high stage, increase all above values by (2) Irregular section, with pools, slight channel meander (a) Channels (a) to (e) above, increase all values about (3) Mountain streams; no vegetation in channel, banks usually steep, trees and brush along banks submerged at high stage (a) Bottom, gravel, cobbles and few boulders (b) Bottom, cobbles with large boulders Manning's n Range 0.030 0.035 0.035 0.05 0.035 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.07 NOTES: 1. For poor quality construction, use larger values of n. 2. For important work and where accurate determination of water profiles is necessary, the designer is urged to consult the references cited and to select n by comparison of the specific conditions with the channels tested. 3. with channel of alignment other than straight, lose of head by resistance forces will be increased. A small increase In value of a may be made to allow for the additional loss of energy. d. Rack (1) Based on design section 0.035 (2) Based on actual mean section (a) Smooth and uniform 0.035 0.040 (b) lagged and irregular 0.040 0.045 Condition Fair Poor e. Channels not maintained, weeds and brush uncut (1) Dense weeds, high as flow depth 0.08 0.12 (2) Clean bottom, brush on sides 0.05 0.08 (3) Same, highest stage of flow 0.07 0.11 (4) Dense brush, high stage 0.10 0.14 08 NATURAL STREAM CBANNELS5 a. Minor streams 0(surface width at flood stage, 100 ft) (1) Fairly regular section (a) Some grass and weeds, little or no brush (b) Dense growth of weeds, depth of flow materially greater than weed height (c) Some weeds, light brush on banks (d) Some weeds, heavy brush on banks (e) For trees within channel with branches submerged at high stage, increase all above values by (2) Irregular section, with pools, slight channel meander (a) Channels (a) to (e) above, increase all values about (3) Mountain streams; no vegetation in channel, banks usually steep, trees and brush along banks submerged at high stage (a) Bottom, gravel, cobbles and few boulders (b) Bottom, cobbles with large boulders Manning's n Range 0.030 0.035 0.035 0.05 0.035 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.07 NOTES: 1. For poor quality construction, use larger values of n. 2. For important work and where accurate determination of water profiles is necessary, the designer is urged to consult the references cited and to select n by comparison of the specific conditions with the channels tested. 3. with channel of alignment other than straight, lose of head by resistance forces will be increased. A small increase In value of a may be made to allow for the additional loss of energy. C1 z /tp. 33 &,4,0 �/J 6 3 7-6 Tho Contractor's Representative Add ttn following paragraph: with Contr local 11110110 ioeo dnumbereet vNlch they) or their othor ropresentetive may be contacted 24 hours a day." PART 2 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SECTIO14 200 - ROCK MATERIALS 200 -1.1 Genoral Add: "Alternate Rock Haterlals - Type "S" as do- scribed In Section 40o may be usod, unless specifl - celly prohIbI ted In Spec l el ProvIs l ens ". 200 -1.6 Siona for _Riprap Add: "The Indlvldu el cla ases of rocks used In slope protection 11,61, conform to the following: � /SClS�r1� 145�� 5c1>2e0 D-¢a PERCENTAGE LARGER THAN* CLASSES Rock 1/2 1/4 tb. 2 140. 3 51 zes 2 Ton I Ton Ton To Oeckln9 Oe ck In ffl -5 -100 0 -5 -100 50 -100 G-5 50 -100 0 -5 95 -100 — 50 -100 lb 95 -100 — 95 -100 ffl02 *Tire amount Of materiel smeller than the smallest size Protection shall table exceed, they percentages limit lope mit 4 listed In fin table dofimnlnod on a wolght basis. Complleuco with Ilia percentage limit shown In the table for all othor slzos of 11n Individual places of any class of rock slope proloctlon shall be 63- termined by it" ratio of fin number of Individual pieces lergor Ilran Ilia smnllost ilia listed In the table for chat class. s2o0 -1.6.1 Selection of Rlprap and Filter TR-artxaTTnfTMar---- r� No, Z Fan ''(N�- 111146 GJ/ 41 E ��� Filter Blanket (3) Upper Lnyev(s) Opt. I Opt. 2 Vol. Rock ftll,rnp Soc. Sec. Lower rt /Sec Class thick- 200 400 Opt. 3 Layer (1) (2) noss "T" (4) (4) (5) (6) Bo. 3 Dnck- 6-7 Ing .6 3/16" C2 D.G. -- Ho. 2 -- Back- 7 -0 trig 1.0 114" B3 O.r. -- rac- 0-9.5 trig 1.4 3/0" D.G. -- 3/4", 1 1/2" 9.5 -II Light 2.0 112" -- P.O. -- 1/4 1 1 /2" 11 -13 Ton 2.7 3 /4" -- P.D. Sand 3 /A ", .�1/2 1 112" 1`� Ton 3.4 1" -- P.O. Sand t5 -17 I Ton 4.3 1 112" -- Type 0 Send 17 -20 2 Too 5.4 2" — Type B and r� No, Z Fan ''(N�- 111146 GJ/ 41 E ��� SECTION 4 CURB INLET SIZING CALCULATIONS & CULVERT SIZE CALCULATIONS frf aura #af of ♦i#aara+ailrrt#ft + +#arf ii+ a+ aa+ fa #+iatr!!ft#arr+ + #ata # #a +• ♦ # +aa HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS - I PROGRAM PACKAGE (C) Copyright 1982 -92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 3.1A Release Date: 2/17/92 License ID 1388 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 North Hwy. 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA. 92075 Ph. 858- 259 -8212 Fax: 858- 259 -4812 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 11:23 6/ 9/2000 a +araaarrr rrrarirrrraarrrr DESCRIPTION OF STUDY * * * " +r+ataaratartrf ar +ara * Drainage Channel Inlet size calculations. r i * Total interception * 6 -9 -2000 ms Node B r rr +r. +a air• +rrasaaa rraarr+ rrraaararar+ ataa+ rrraaaaarrrrr +ra +arrrrraraar•r♦ raarraa +arrraaaarraraar rrrrraa ara : #r +aa ara #rraaar +farrairrrrrrrararrrrr as rar »»FLOWBY CATCH BASIN INLET CAPACITY INPUT INFORMATION«« ------------------------------------------------ --------- -- --------- -------- Curb Inlet Capacities are approximated based on the Bureau of Public Roads nomograph plots for flowby basins and sump basins. STREETFLOW(CFS) = 6.40 GUTTER FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .32 BASIN LOCAL DEPRESSION(FEET) _ .25 FLOWBY BASIN WIDTH(FEET) = 23.85 » »CALCULATED BASIN WIDTH FOR TOTAL INTERCEPTION = 23.9 »»CALCULATED ESTIMATED INTERCEPTION(CFS) = 6.4 rr+ +r arar♦r+rra +rraa+r+a +rr+f raa +ar+Nrrwwaa +rrrar+aaaafferfara rwf araa rr + +fr HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS - I PROGRAM PACKAGE (C) Copyright 1982 -92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 3.1A Release Date: 2117192 License ID 1388 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 North Hwy. 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA. 92075 Ph. 858- 259 -8212 Fax: 858- 259 -4812 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 10: 2 6/ 9/2000 == a== e==. ...._______________________________ _______________________________ rra rraarr + + ++ ++ + + +♦ + +ra + ++ DESCRIPTION OF STUDY rf ++a + + + + +affa # #aaraa ++ +r+ • Check Capacity of Double 30" RCP Culvert ` • Sta. 1 +68 Fortuna Ranch Rd. ` • See Exhibit "B" node 102 for location. 6 -9 -2000 ms ra++a +aarf rrra aarrar #rrrrrraarafraaaar r+rrw #aar #ra #aarrrr++rr +agar rrf+tr +a rrrwaaarrr rrarararaaaraaarra++ rra aa+ rrr++ arf+ +rrarrra :rrraarrf rarrrawrraaarr » »PIPEFLOW HYDRAULIC INPUT INFORMATION«« ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- PIPE DIAMETER(FEET) - 2.500 PIPE SLOPE(FEET /FEET) _ .0302 PIPEFLOW(CFS) - 33.40 MANNINGS FRICTION FACTOR = .013000 'CRITICAL -DEPTH FLOW INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CRITICAL DEPTH(FEET) = 1.97 CRITICAL FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) 4.141 CRITICAL FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 2.049 CRITICAL FLOW PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 752.06 CRITICAL FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 8.066 CRITICAL FLOW VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) = 1.01 CRITICAL FLOW HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) = 2.02 CRITICAL FLOW SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) = 2.98 = - == NORMAL-DEPTH =FLOW INFORMATION: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NORMAL DEPTH(FEET) = 1.20 FLOW AREA(SQUARE FEET) = 2.34 FLOW TOP- WIDTH(FEET) = 2.498 FLOW PRESSURE + MOMENTUM(POUNDS) = 998.90 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 14.285 FLOW VELOCITY HEAD(FEET) = 3.169 HYDRAULIC DEPTH(FEET) = .94 FROUDE NUMBER = 2.602 SPECIFIC ENERGY(FEET) = 4.37 SECTION 5 REFERENCE DATA & CHARTS TABLE 2 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS ,(RATIONAL METHOD) DEVELOPED AREAS (URBAN) Coefficient, C Land Use Soil Group (1) D Residential: - A 8 C Single Family .4o .45 .50 .55 Multi -Units .45 .50 .60 ,70 Mobile homes .45 .50 .55 .65 Rural (lots greater than 1/2 acre) .30 .35 x.40 45 Commercial(2) 80% Impervious 70 75 .80 $5 Industrial(2) 9rA Impervious .80 .85 .90 95 NOTES; (1)Soil Group mans are available at the 'offices of the Department of Public Works. (2)Where actual conditions deviate significantly from the tabulated impervious- ness values of 801/ or 90%, the values given for coefficient C. may be revised by multiplying 80% or 90% by the ratio of actual imperviousness to the tabulated imperviousness. However, in no case shall the final coefficient be less than 0.50. For example: Consider commercial property on D soil.- group. Actual imperviousness - 50% Tabulated imperviousness = 80% Revised C - 80 x 0.85 - 0.S3 IV -A -9 APPENDIX IX -B Rev. 5/81 TABLE 11. -- INTERPRETATIONS FOR LAND MANAGEMENT -- Continued o 'o Soil Hydro- logic YreuP Eredibility Limitations for conversion from brush to grass RaA Ramona sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes----------- - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RaB Ramona sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes----------- - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RaC Ramona sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes----------- - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RaC2 Ramona sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes, eroded--- - - - - -- C Seven 16 - - -- Slight. Ra D2 Ramona sandy loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes, eroded-- - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RcD Ramona gravelly sandy loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes- - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RcE Ramona gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes - - - - -- C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RdG Redding gravelly loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes------- - - - - -- D Severe 9 - - - -- Moderate. ReE Redding cobbly loam, 9 to 30 percent slopes-------- - - - - -- D Severe 9 - - - -- Moderate. RfF Redding cobbly loam, dissected, 15 to 50 percent D Severe 1 - - - -- Moderate. TOE2 slopes. C Severe 9 - - - -- Severe. RhC Redding -Urban land complex, 2 to 9 percent slopes: TOG Redding--------------- --- ---- ---------- ------- --- ---- D Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. Urban land-------------- ----------- ----- --- ---- - - - --- D RhE Redding-Urban land complex, 9 to 30 percent slopes: A Severe 2 - - - -- Slight. UrUrban Redding------------------ ----- ------- --- ------------- D VaA Urban land------------ ------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RkA leiff fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes------- - - - - -- B Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RkB eiff fine sandy loam, 2 to S percent slopes------- - - - - -- B Severe 16 - - -- Slight. RkC teiff fine sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes------- - - - - -- B Severe 16 - - -- Slight. Rm liverwash ----------------- --- -- ----- --------------- - - - - -- A Severe 2, 4 -- Severe. RoA lositas fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes----------- - - - - -- A Severe 2 RrC Zositas fine sand, hummocky, 5 to 9 percent slopes- - - - - -- A Severe 2 RsA Zositas loamy coarse sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes--- - - - - -- A Severe 2 RsC Zositas loamy coarse sand, 2 to 9 percent slopes--- - - - - -- A Severe 2 sitas loamy coarse sand, 9 to 15 percent slopes-- - - - - -- A Severe 2 ugh broken land---------------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. linas clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes----------- - - - - -- C Moderate 2 - -- Slight. 1/ linas clay loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes----------- - - - - -- C Moderate 2 - -- Slight. 11 linas clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes---------------- - - - - -- C Slight- - - - - -- Slight. 1/ 4SnGan linas clay, 2 to 5 percent slopes---------------- - - - - -- C Slight- - - - - -- Slight. 11 Miguel - Exchequer rocky silt loamy, 9 to 70 percent slopes: San Miguel------------------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe I - - - -- Severe. Exchequer-------------------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe 1 - - - -- I Severe. footnotes at end of table. 37 slopes, eroded. _ Sp G2 Sheephead rocky fine sandy loam, 30 to 6S percent C Severe 1 - - - -- Moderate. 41 slopes, eroded. SrD Sl oping gullied land------------------------------- - - - - -- B Severe 2 - - - -- Severe. 4/ SSE Soboba stony loamy sand, 9 to 30 percent slopes---- - - - - -- A Severe 2 - - - -- Moderate StG Steep gullied land--------------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. SuA Stockpen gravelly clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes- - - - - -- D Moderate 2 - -- Slight. SUB Stockpen gravelly clay loam, 2 to S percent slopes- - - - - -- D Moderate 2 - -- Slight. SVEStony land----------------------------------------- - - - - -- A Severe 1----- Severe. TeF Terrace escarpments-------------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. Tf Tidal flats---------------------------------------- - - - - -- D Severe 2, 4 TOE2 Tollhouse rocky coarse sandy loam, S to 30 percent C Severe 9 - - - -- Severe. slopes, eroded. TOG Tollhouse rocky coarse sandy loam, 30 to 65 percent C Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. slopes. TUB ujunga sand, 0 to S percent slopes---------------- - - - - -- A Severe 2 - - - -- Slight. UrUrban land---------------- -- --- -- ------------- --- -------- D VaA Visalia sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes---------- - - - - -- B Severe 16 - - -- Slight. footnotes at end of table. 37 TABLE 11. -- INTERPRETATIONS FOR LAND MANAGEMENT [Numerals indicate soil properties or qualities that affect erodibility. Numeral 1 refers to slope; 2 to surface layer texture; 9 to depth to hard rock, or a hardpan, or any layer that restricts permeability; 16 to grade of structure in the surface layer. Absence of rating means no valid interpretations can be made] Soil s AcG Acid igneous rock land ----------------------------------- AtC Altamont clay, 5 to 9 percent slopes -------------------- AtD Alt=ont clay, 9 to 15 percent slopes------ ----- ---- --- -- AtD2 Altamont clay, 9 to 1S percent slopes, eroded ------------ AtE Altamont clay, 15 to 30 percent slopes----- ---- ---- - - - - -- -->AtE2 Altamont clay, 15 to 30 percent slopes, eroded--------- -- AtF Altamont clay, 30 to 50 percent slopes----------- ---- ---- AuC knderson very gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes. AuF derson very gravelly sandy loam, 9 to 45 percent slopes. AwC uId clay, 5 to 9 percent slopes---------- ---- ----- - -- - -- AyE Auld stony clay, 9 to 30 percent slopes ------------------ BaG Badland- -- ---'---- - --"-- BbE Bancas stony loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes ---------------- BbE2 Bancas stony loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes, eroded -------- BbG Bancas stony loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes --------------- BbG2 Bancas stony loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes, eroded ------- BeE Blasingame loam, 9 to 30 percent slopes ------------------ BgE Blasingame stony loam, 9 to 30 percent slopes ------------ BgF Blasingame stony loam, 30 to SO percent Slopes ----------- BIC Bonsall sandy loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes ---------------- B1C2 Bonsall sandy loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes, eroded -------- B1D2 Bonsall sandy loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes, eroded ------- BmC Bonsall sandy loam, thick surface, 2 to 9 percent slopes. BnB Bonsall - Fallbrook sandy lows, 2 to 5 percent slopes: Bonsall---------------------------------------------- Fallbrook -------------------------------------------- BoC Boomer loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes___ _____ ______ ___ _ __ ___ BoE Boomer loam, 9 to 30 percent slopes----------- ----- - --- -- BrE Boomer stony loam, 9 to 30 percent slopes ---------------- BrG Boomer stony loam, 30 to 6S percent slopes --------------- BsC Bosanko clay, 2 to 9 percent slopes ---------- ------------ BsD Bosanko clay, 9 to 15 percent slopes --------------------- BsE Bosanko clay, 15 to 30 percent slopes -------------------- BtC Bosanko stony clay, 5 to 9 percent slopes ---------------- BuB Bull Trail sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ------------- BuC Bull Trail sandy loam, S to 9 percent slopes ------------- BuD2 Bull Trail sandy loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes, eroded ---- BuE2 Bull Trail sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, eroded --- CaB Calpine coarse sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes --------- CaC Calpine coarse sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes --------- CaC2 Calpine coarse sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes, eroded. See footnotes at end of table. 32 Hydro- logic group Erodibility Limitations for conversion from brush to grass D Severe 1 - -___ Severe. D Slight- - - - - -- Slight. 1/ D Slight- - - - -_- Slight. 11 D Slight- - - - - -- Slight. 1/ D Moderate I - -- Slight. 1/ D Moderate 1 - -- Slight. 1/ D Severe 1 - - - -- Moderate I/ A Severe 16 - - -- Slight. — A Severe 16 - - -- Moderate. 2/ D I Slight- - - - - -- I Slight. D Moderate 1 - -- Slight. D Severe 1 - - - -- Severe. C Severe 16 - - -- Moderate. C Severe 16 - - -- Moderate. C Severe 1 - - - -- Moderate. C Severe 1 - - - -- Moderate. D Severe 16 - - -- Slight. D Severe 16 - - -- Moderate. D Severe 1 - - - -- Moderate. D Severe 9 - - - -- Slight. D Severe 9 - - - -- Slight. D Severe 9 - - - -- Slight. D Moderate 2 - -- Slight. D Severe 9 - - - -- Slight. C Severe 9 - - - -- Slight. C Moderate 2 - -- Slight. C Moderate 1 - -- Slight. C Moderate 1 - -- Slight. C Severe 1 - - - -- Moderate. D Moderate 16 -- Slight. 1/ D Moderate 16 -- Slight. 1/ D Moderate 1 - -- Slight. 11 D Moderate 16 -- Slight. T/ C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. 4/ C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. 4/ C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. 4/ C Severe 16 - - -- Slight. a/ B Moderate 2 - -- Slight. B Moderate 2 - -- Slight. 4/ B Moderate 2 - -- Slight. 4/ 1 ' COUNTY OF SAN SANITOATION b 100-YEAR 24- I•.I0[ 11 FIRMPITATION OU CONTROL r _ FLOW /'20JI;Q�%CU�Ir�LS � 1Q0 -YEAR 2� HOUR PRECIPITATION IN - ENTIIS OF AN INCA 451 5 X100 klt H 507 I ,cnAC11�� 11. s 135 < moo, f) \:'1 @9 �� 1.11CL. uc I In u .cl p0 sACr. (60 zS ' IV� i sAtl a 16111E 1 IOU - 15 I. -;I..Y'aul 10 I , 100. 11C 1 s S 1 1 Irn.... ._ {. 1 - �- 33• - �o , - — �� J 7 x.10 .�� / A J• ' 1� Ir- - Yr•r. a b, I ��., ' OF COMMERCE ' ` � A „cu1.d+ , • � U.S. DEPA Al ,..rr QJ _ NATIONAL OCI:'A \IC ANO M" UYI'IIERIC AUAINIS'(R ATIUN J �O� !AL STVOIES UFAYCII. OFFICE OF 11 �UVOLOGY. NATIONAL WEATIIER SEFt"CE SA ••I': /� L1• - 5' 065G0 (�5'GJ U'8010 '� 1111' 71,31 'I01 I;' 1 11• 7,1;1 31711 I IIG• COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FLOOD DEPAqTMENT OF SANITATION L q (}[�_�� PREC4 '- 11TATI•`08"N FLOOD C0;(TROL , j!_l'iA i� `�t5 'r '-20-,/ ISOPLUVIALS OF 100 -YEAR 6 -HOUR rn1 •1(� i PRECIS If�►TIL1'l Iil EINT►lS ri �i 1 1i,T'I 451 IN 10 \ y�{ `U •ors •C151: !cl ( \ �,\ q; r � \�11 r, \` A CE.ACII ' i , 45� ' ;,> sn .E 351 J i� l0 35 \ IACCCt 1 301, 30\ < °, \ C. Ems/ • ' �\��: \\ - SAN CE MENiE :� 1 451 ; I41 77.J_ �. - - - -o - U i 111 11'7+ 3 33 9 I 30 v. 'JDNA i p`a0 G �z r 20 l r a5 451 / I E CAJOIX ( �• �, 1— 20 P,.,. :d by U.S. DEPARTMEN 1' OF COMMERCE IAru.• :� \ IIATIO`/AL OCEANIC AND AT: OSPIIEHIC ADA:INISTRATION j1' qqqqqq ~ 'ECIAL STVDIES ORANCH. OFFICE OF It UROLOGY. NATIONAL WEATIIER SERVICE SAI 110 301 20 35 3� 0 1181 451 .301 151 1 17' —1,151 301 151 116' %' re — S0d0 Tc = Time of conccnfiafion —4040 L Lcng /h o{ wale ,-shed H • D//Pcnence in e%vafibn along —3000 effeCfiYC s/occ 1117 (Sce Soocndi)rX -BI T L � iLli/cs Fcc/ /%ups 1I M /nufcs —1000 I 4 T 7449 3 5 N SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL DISTRICT SERVICES DESIGN MANUAL APPROVED L 300 200 /BO WEA /00 90 BD 70 nZ .S-40 40 EI. -20 /a /6 /4 /2 9 8 7 G -S 4 3 NOMOGRAPH FOR DETERMINATION OF TIME OF CONCENTRATION (Tc) FOR NATURAL WATERSHEDS DATE /2 APPENDIX X -A V -A -in n,.,, qi.a 900 B00 1 700 600 \ \ S -Soo \ �3- - 300 \cam 3 SDOO �40D0 SD as__ .000 \ <O 2000 \. /BOD 30 NOT /600 OFOR NATURAL WATGRSI /20d 20 N ADD TEN MINUTES TO /000 COMPUTED TIME OF CON - CENTRATION_ 900 800 600 /O 5049 400 5 N SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL DISTRICT SERVICES DESIGN MANUAL APPROVED L 300 200 /BO WEA /00 90 BD 70 nZ .S-40 40 EI. -20 /a /6 /4 /2 9 8 7 G -S 4 3 NOMOGRAPH FOR DETERMINATION OF TIME OF CONCENTRATION (Tc) FOR NATURAL WATERSHEDS DATE /2 APPENDIX X -A V -A -in n,.,, qi.a 6 �D (11Y ^ 9 15 20 30 40 50 1 N INTENSITY,DUAATION DESIGN CHART 3 4 5 6 rn x 0 c 7 ^ r: 6.0 °Y 5.0 4.5 4.0 ;�6 ^ March 1902 Directions for Application: 1) From precipitation reaps determine 6 hr. and 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrolo(, Manual (10, 50 and 100 yr. maps included in , Design and Procedure Manual). 2) Adjust 6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr. precipitation. (Not applicable to Desert) 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on the right side of the chart. 4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines. 5) This line is the intensity- duration curve for the location being analyzed. Application Form: 0) Selected Frequency 162 yr. 1) P6 = in., P24= i-� *P6 = 5 0 %* P24 2) Adjusted *P6= 3-(0 1n. 3) tc = 13 min. 4) I 5.12 in /hr. *Not Applicable to Desert Region APPENDIX XI IV -A -14 SECTION 6 DRAINAGE AREA & NODE MAPS C I f' t 1 I' 1 r. Z.rY k; f -_ - /i, /.: - - • 11lf /fv f �" �• 1" .. I :EJ f .�- a. AF t X /.2 E..A _.. ENGINEERING, INC CONSTRUCTION STING & ENGINEERING, INC. SAN DIEGO, CA RIVERSIDE, CA VENTL'RA, CA TRACS',CA LANCASTER CA • SACRAMENTO, CA 2414 Vineyard Am - 490 E. Pdnceland CL 1645 Pacific Ave, 242 W. Larch 4215610th SL W. 36M Madiwo Ace. Suite G Suite 7 Suite 105 Suite F Unit K Suite 22 Escondido. CA 922029 Corona, CA 91719 Oxna d, CA 93033 Trap, CA 95304 Lw sster, CA 935M N. Righlands CA "W 17601 7464955 1909137118% 180514866475 12091839-2890 16611126 %76 (916) 3,31-6030 176017469806 FAX 190913112168 FAX 180514869016 r4x 12091839.2895 r.x 16611 726,0246 FAX 19161331-6037 rcx UPDATE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ADAM'S RUN PROPOSED FOUR -UNIT DEVELOPMENT OLIVENHAIN, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT 16885 WEST BERNARDO DRIVE SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92127 Prepared by: CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92029 CTE JOB NO. 10 -2972 SEPTEMBER 7, 2000 ' r GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION � o0 �J &I ENGINEERING, INC. CONSTRUCTION STING & ENGINEERING, INC. SAN DIEGO, CA RIVERSIDE, CA VENTURA, CA TRACT, CA LANCASTER CA • SACRAMENTO, CA 2417 V'rnerard Ave. 790 E. Princeland CL 1645 Pacific Am 242 W. Larcb 1215610th SL W. 3628 Madison Ave Suite G Suite 7 Suite 105 Stile F Unit K Suite 22 Escondido, CA 92029 Comes. CA 91719 Oenurd. CA 93033 Tray, CA 95304 Lancaster, CA 93511 N. Hodands CA 9-660 (760) 746 -7955 (909)371.18% 1805)486.6475 12091879 -2890 16611726- %76 (916)331-60M (7601 74t,"06 FAN (909) 371 -2168 FAN 1&151486-9016 FAN 12091839 -2895 FAN 16611726-0246 FAX (916) 331-6037 FAX Mr. John Silverwood Benamel Development, Inc. 16885 West Bernardo Drive San Diego, California 92660 Subject: Update Geotechnical Investigation Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development Olivenhain, California Mr. Silverwood: At your request, CTE has prepared this update geotechnical investigation report. This firm had previously investigated this site in 1998. As part of the present scope of work we reviewed our earlier report. We also performed a geologic reconnaissance of the site area. Presented in this report are conclusions and recommendations for your use in project design. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. Jonathan Goodmacher, CEG #2136 Senior Geologist GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Section pace INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ....................................................................... ..............................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ...................................... ..............................2 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................... ..............................2 1.2 Scope of Services ............................................................................. ..............................2 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................. ..............................2 3.0 PREVIOUS FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS ............. ..............................3 3.1 Field Investigations .......................................................................... ..............................3 4.0 GEOLOGY .................................................................................................. ..............................4 4.1 General Setting ................................................................................ ..............................4 4.2 Geologic Condit ions ........................................................................ ..............................4 4.2.1 Topsoils ................................................................................... ..............................4 4.2.2 Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics ........................................... ..............................4 4.3 Groundwater Conditions .................................................................. ..............................5 4.4 Seismic Refraction Survey Results and Rippability Assessment .... ..............................5 4.5 Geologic Hazards ............................................................................. ..............................7 4.5.1 General Geologic Hazards Observation ................................. ..............................7 4.5.2 Local and Regional Faulting ................................................... ..............................7 4.5.3 Seismic Loading Parameters ................................................... ..............................8 4.5.4 Liquefaction Evaluation .......................................................... ..............................8 4.5.5 Seismic Settlement Evaluation ............................................... ..............................8 4.5.6 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation ............................................ ..............................9 4.5.7 Landsliding or Rocksliding ..................................................... ..............................9 4.5.8 Compressible and Expansive Soils ......................................... ..............................9 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... .............................10 5.1 General ............................................................................................ .............................10 5.2 Grading and Eart hwork ................................................................... .............................10 5.3 Site Preparation ............................................................................... .............................10 5.4 Site Excavat ion ............................................................................... .............................11 5.5 Fill Placement and Compaction ..................................................... ..............................1 l 5.6 Fill Materials ................................................................................... .............................12 5.7 Foundations and Slab Recommendations ........................................ .............................12 5.7.1 Foundations ............................................................................ .............................13 5.7.2 Foundation Settl ement ........................................................... .............................13 5.7.3 Foundation Setback ............................................................... .............................14 5.7.4 Concrete Slabs ....................................................................... .............................14 5.8 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures .......................................... .............................14 5.9 Exterior Fl atwork ............................................................................ .............................15 5.10 Drainage ........................................................................................ .............................15 5.11 Asphalt Pavements ........................................................................ .............................16 5.12 Slopes ............................................................................................ .............................16 r TABLE OF CONTENTS Section........................................................................................................ ..............................P e 5.13 Construction Observation ............................................................. .............................17 5.14 Plan Review .................................................................................. .............................17 6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION .................................................... .............................18 FIGURES FIGURE I SITE INDEX MAP FIGURE 2 EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP FIGURE 3 RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL APPENDICES APPENDIX A REFERENCES CITED APPENDIX B EXPLORATION LOGS APPENDIX C SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING PROJECTS 0 Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 1 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 INVESTIGATION SUMMARY This update investigation was performed to provide site - specific geotechnical information for the proposed four -unit residential development. Based on our findings, this project is feasible, from a geotechnical viewpoint, if the recommendations presented in this report are implemented. Previous investigations had found that surface and near- surface soils consist of topsoil and units of the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. Surficial topsoils were found to consist generally of moist, loose, clayey silty sands with gravel with abundant organics. Removal of topsoils will be necessary before construction may begin. The maximum observed depth of surficial soils requiring removal was approximately two feet below grade (fbg). Units of the Santiago Peak Volcanics, underlying the topsoils, generally excavated as dry, sandy clay to silty sands with coarse gravel and cobble -sized fragments. The Santiago Peak Volcanics were observed decreasingly less weathered with increasing depth beneath the surface. Groundwater was not encountered in our borings to the total depths explored (approximately eight and fbg). Although groundwater levels will likely fluctuate during periods of precipitation, groundwater is not expected to affect the proposed development if recommendations regarding drainage are carried out during construction. With respect to geologic and seismic hazards, the site is considered as safe as any within the San Diego County area, a region of moderate to high seismic risk. Based on the geologic findings and reference review no active surface faults are known to exist at the site. r.ro.,.:..». r rt Im r. rn_�mrnrti�m Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 2 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. l Introduction This report presents the results of our update investigations and provides conclusions and geotechnical engineering criteria for the proposed development. It is our understanding that the site is to be developed by constructing four, one- and two -story, wood -frame residential structures and associated improvements (including utilities, landscaping, and driveway and sidewalk areas). Specific recommendations for excavations fill placement and foundation design for the proposed improvements are presented in this report. This firm had previously investigated this site in 1998 (CTE, 1998). That investigation included field exploration, laboratory testing, geologic hazard evaluation, and engineering analysis. Appendix A contains a list of references cited in this report. 1.2 Scope of Services The scope of services provided includes: • Review of readily available geologic and soils reports pertinent to the site and adjacent areas. • Definition of the general geology and evaluation of potential geologic hazards at the site. • Soil engineering design criteria for the proposed improvements. • Preparation of this summary report (with geotechnical construction recommendations). 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The approximately 10 -acre site is north of Fortuna Ranch Road, across from its intersection with Akita Lane in the Olivenhain area in the City of Encinitas. In general, the site slopes downward toward the southwest. Approximate site elevations range from 476 feet above mean sea level (msl) at the northeastern comer of the property to 387 feet above msl at the southwestern corner. Figure 1 is arl index map showing the general location of the site. Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 3 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 Several hard, relatively unaltered outcrops of volcanic rock were observed on the northern half of the site. Access to the site is via Fortuna Ranch Road, a dirt and gravel road forming the southern property boundary. A second dirt and gravel road forms the eastern site boundary. 3.0 PREVIOUS FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS 3.1 Field Investigations Field exploration, conducted July 27, 1998, included site reconnaissance, the observation and logging of ten shallow test pits, and five seismic refraction traverses (CTE, 1998). The test pits were excavated using a conventional backhoe to a maximum depth of approximately eight and % fbg. Geologists from this office logged soils in the field. Field descriptions and classifications were modified, where appropriate, to reflect laboratory test results. Exploration logs including descriptions of the soil and field - testing data are presented in our referenced report. Approximate exploration locations are shown on Figure 2. Copies of the test pit logs are presented in Appendix A. A Soil Test ND -11 Signal Enhancement Seismograph was used during our seismic refraction surveys. The length of the five seismic traverses ranged from 70. to 100 feet. Approximate exploration locations are shown on Figure 2. Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to assist in the development of engineering parameters for this project. cI0...�..w 1!l'1M1 m fA1MY11111'101TY.+ IIw.1.�.r rF.��.l A.v Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 4 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 4.0 GEOLOGY 4.1 General Settine The site lies within the northern coastal portion of San Diego County area. Landforms near the site consist generally of uplifted marine terraces grading into rolling hills. The areal topography generally slopes down to the west and south. 4.2 Geologic Conditions Based on geologic mapping by Tan and Kennedy (1996) soils consist of Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. However, based on our observations a surficial layer of topsoils overlies the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. The nature and depth of basement rocks below the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics are unknown. 4.2.1 Topsoils Topsoils were observed to depths of about one to two fbg. In general, these soils were found to consist of moist, loose, clayey, silty sands with abundant organics. Topsoils are not suitable, in their current state, for support of structures or additional fill. We recommend removal of these soils. However, they may be re -used as fill onsite if they are screened of organic contamination and oversize debris (greater than three inches in diameter). 4.2.2 Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics Several sub -units of the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics were observed underlying topsoils. These included residual soils (forming from the in -place decomposition of the bedrock), volcanic rock, and volcanic tuffs. Each of these sub -units was observed to become less Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 5 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 weathered with increasing depth beneath the surface. These soils excavated as sandy clays to silty sands with coarse gravel to cobble -sized fragments. 4.3 Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was not encountered in any of our exploratory test pits to the maximum depth explored of eight and %z fbg. Groundwater is not expected to affect the proposed development provided proper drainage is maintained. 4.4 Seismic Refraction Survey Results and Rippability Assessment Presented in Tables 1 and 2 below are the results and interpretations of our seismic refiaction survey traverses. In general, we were able to resolve two different velocity layers from each traverse. However, interpretation the data was made difficult by the presence of the previously mentioned bedrock knobs. Table 1 below presents our interpretation of the "raw" seismic refraction data. Noticeable increases in velocity (from 1100 — 2000 feet/second to 2750 — 6000 feet/second were observed at approximate depths of 2 — 3.4 fbg. Weathered volcanics typically have a velocity of 2,000 -6,000 feet/second (ft/s). Solid volcanic rock typically has a velocity of 6,000 - 20,000 ft/s. Therefore, data from the test pits and the seismic traverses suggest that hard volcanic bedrock will be encountered at depths of 10 to 17 fbg in the areas investigated. However, based on surface observations of outcrops, we anticipate solid volcanic rock will be encountered locally at shallower depths. t TABLE I PRELIMINARY RIPPABILM ASSESSMENT Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 6 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 Seismic Depth of Layers Approximate Elevation (feet above m sl) Traverse No. feet Rippability Assessment Maximum Depth Explored (feet) 0 -3.1 Rippable ST -1 3.1 -17 Rippable to Marginally Rippable ST -1 +17 Non-R ippable 3000 0-2 Rippable ST -2 2' -10.4 Rippable to Marginally Rippable ST -2 +10.4 Non-Rippable 2750 04 Rippable ST -3 4 Rippable to Marginally Rippable ST -3 0-3.4 Rippable 6000 3.4' -16 Rippable to Marginally Rippable ST-4 +16 Non-Rippable ST-4 0-3 Rippable ST -5 3' -17 Rippable to Marginally Rippable 16 +17 Non-Rippable Presented on Table 2 is our interpretation of the data correlated to a Caterpillar D -9 with mounted hydraulic No. 9 ripper in igneous rocks (specifically volcanics). Caterpillar Tractor Company developed the correlation tables used. Velocities of less than 4,500 feet per second (fps) are considered rippable. Velocities between 4,500 and 5,500 fps are considered marginally rippable and may require blasting. Velocities of greater than 5,500 fps will most likely require blasting. TABLE 2 DATA FROM SEISMIC TRAVERSES Traverse No. Approximate Elevation (feet above m sl) Layer Velocities Depth feet Length of Traverse (feet) Maximum Depth Explored (feet) Vi Vr Vr D, Di ST -1 460 1300 3000 6000 3.1 17 100 30+ ST -2 451 2000 2750 6000 2 10.4 80 25+ ST -3 444 1300 6000 4 70 20+ ST-4 434 1500 4000 7000 3.4 16 80 25+ a I0...:.... In ImI.n IIwA... (:w...A..:,..1 M.. Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 7 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 4.5 Geologic Hazards 4.5.1 General Geologic Hazards Observation From our investigation it appears that geologic hazards at the site are primarily limited to those caused by violent shaking from earthquake generated ground motion waves. The potential for damage from displacement or fault movement beneath the proposed structures should be considered low due to the absence of any known active surface faults in the immediate site area. 4.5.2 Local and Regional Faulting Based on our site reconnaissance, evidence from our explorations, and a review of appropriate geologic literature, it is our opinion that the site is not on known fault traces. The Rose Canyon Fault, approximately six miles (10 kilometers) to the west, is the closest known active fault (Jennings, 1987). Other principal active regional faults and fault zones are the San Clemente, Coronado Banks, Elsinore, San Jacinto, and San Andreas. According to the I IM .- ll1.11YY11I IL'W'1MC.I I I..A.I. • TABLE 2 DATA FROM SEISMIC TRAVERSES Traverse Approximate Layer Velocities Depth Length of Maximum No. Elevation feet Traverse Depth V, V2 V3 D, D, (feet above (feet) Explored MI) (feet) ST -5 410 1100 2250 8000 3 17 100 30+ NOTES: V, — Velocity in feet per second of first layer of materials. Vt — Second layer velocity. V3 — Third layer velocity. D, — Depth in feet to base of first layer. D2 — Depth to base of second layer. 4.5 Geologic Hazards 4.5.1 General Geologic Hazards Observation From our investigation it appears that geologic hazards at the site are primarily limited to those caused by violent shaking from earthquake generated ground motion waves. The potential for damage from displacement or fault movement beneath the proposed structures should be considered low due to the absence of any known active surface faults in the immediate site area. 4.5.2 Local and Regional Faulting Based on our site reconnaissance, evidence from our explorations, and a review of appropriate geologic literature, it is our opinion that the site is not on known fault traces. The Rose Canyon Fault, approximately six miles (10 kilometers) to the west, is the closest known active fault (Jennings, 1987). Other principal active regional faults and fault zones are the San Clemente, Coronado Banks, Elsinore, San Jacinto, and San Andreas. According to the I IM .- ll1.11YY11I IL'W'1MC.I I I..A.I. • Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 8 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Clivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 California Division of Mines and Geology, a fault is zoned as active if it displays evidence of activity in the last 11,000 years (Hart, 1994). 4.5.3 Seismic Loading Parameters In accordance with the Uniform Building Code 1997 edition and assumed preliminary information, the project site should be considered to have source factors of Nv=1.0 and N, 1.0, and seismic coefficients of Cv =0.56 and C, —O.40. These factors are based on a seismic zone factor Z =0.40, a seismic source type of B for the Rose Canyon Fault, a distance from the seismic source to the subject site of approximately 10 km, and a soil profile of S.. 4.5.4 Liquefaction Evaluation Liquefaction occurs when saturated fine- grained sands or silts lose their physical strengths during earthquake induced shaking and behave as a liquid. This is due to loss of point -to -point grain contact and transfer of normal stress to the pore water. Liquefaction potential varies with water level, soil type, material gradation, relative density, and probable intensity and duration of ground shaking. Based on the generally dense nature of the underlying on -site soils and the absence of a permanent shallow groundwater condition, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction should be considered low in all areas of the project. 4.5.5 Seismic Settlement Evaluation Seismic settlement occurs when loose to medium dense granular soils densify during seismic events (earthquakes). The underlying on -site materials were generally found to be medium F�1Pm:r.. Ill.'1MI m I11.tMIN IlL'f0'iTO.w I IwA... (1w....rAw:N1 M.. Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 9 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 dense to very dense and are not considered likely to experience significant seismic settlement. Therefore, in our opinion, the potential for seismic settlement resulting in damage to site improvements should be considered low. 4.5.6 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation The site is not near any significant bodies of water that could induce seiche (oscillatory waves) damage. Because of the site's distance from the ocean (approximately one mile) and elevation above sea level, the potential for tsunami damage at the site is considered remote 4.5.7 Landslidin¢ or Rockslidine During our investigation, active landslides were not encountered. Additionally, active slides have not been mapped in the immediate area of the site (Tan and Giffen, 1995). According to Tan and Giffen (1995), the site area is designated as marginally susceptible to landsliding. However, the lack of significant steep natural slopes decreases the probability of landsliding on this site. Cut slopes should be evaluated during grading operations by the geotechnical representative to verify conditions are as anticipated. If potential adverse slope conditions were observed, alternate recommendations may be warranted. 4.5.8 Compressible and Expansive Soils Based on geologic observation and laboratory testing of similar soils from nearby lots, Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanic materials exhibit very low to low compressibility and expansion characteristics and are considered suitable for support of fill and improvements. Surficial topsoil/fill soils were found to be low to moderately expansive and compressible. r IO...:.... I ImI...Irt1M % I I M Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 10 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 Therefore, we recommend the removal of surficial soils to the depth of competent Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 General We conclude that the proposed construction at the site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, if the recommendations in this report are incorporated into the design of the project. 5.2 Grading and Earthwork Upon commencement of construction, we should continuously observe grading and earthwork operations for this project. Such observations are essential to identify field conditions that differ from those predicted by this investigation, to adjust designs to actual field conditions, and to determine that the grading is in overall accordance with the recommendations of this report. Our personnel should perform adequate observation and sufficient testing of fills during grading to support the Geotechnical Consultant's professional opinion regarding compliance with compaction requirements and specifications contained herein. 5.3 Site Preparation Before any grading occurs, the site should be cleared of existing debris and other deleterious materials. In areas to receive structures or distress - sensitive improvements, surficial eroded, desiccated, burrowed, or otherwise loose or disturbed soils should be removed to the depth of the competent Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. Removal depths of one to two fbg are expected. To prevent transitional bearing conditions (a change from cut native to fill soils under the building) it Update Geotechnical Investigation Page I I Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 may be necessary to perform overexcavation to create a uniform 3 -foot thick fill cap on some lots. Overexcavations to create this fill cap should extend a minimum of five feet laterally beyond proposed improvement limits. Organic materials not suitable for structural backfill should be disposed of off -site or placed in non - structural planter or landscape areas. All organic materials excavated and removed should be disposed of at a legal disposal site. 5.4 Site Excavation Based on our observations, shallow excavations in site materials will generally be feasible with light construction equipment under normal conditions. Irreducible materials greater than six inches in maximum diameter should generally not be encountered during excavations and if encountered, should not be used in shallow fills on the site. We should be called upon to evaluate the subgrade to verify that mitigative measures (removal of inadequate soils and treatment of transitional conditions) have been properly implemented. As stated, transitional bearing conditions are to be avoided. All structures should be underlain entirely by properly compacted fill or entirely by Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics. No footing or slab area should span a cut: fill interface. Again, to avoid transitional conditions it may be necessary to perform overexcavation on some lots. 5.5 Fill Placement and Compaction The geotechnical consultant should verify that the proper site preparation has occurred before fill placement occurs. Following removal of loose, disturbed soils areas to receive fills or concrete slabs on grade should be scarified to a depth of at least nine inches, moisture conditioned to above L .C...:..r. 11 Iml ... llLll IIL' R_ I � Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 12 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 optimum moisture content, and properly compacted. Fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent as evaluated by ASTM D1557 at moisture content between 2 and 4 percent above optimum. The optimum lift thickness for backfill soil will be dependent on the type of compaction equipment used. Generally, backfill should be placed in uniform lifts not exceeding 8- inches in loose thickness. Backfill placement and compaction should be done in overall conformance with geotechnical recommendations and local ordinances. 5.6 Fill Materials Very low to low expansion soils derived from the onsite materials are considered suitable for reuse on the site as compacted fill, provided they are screened of organic materials and materials greater than six inches in maximum dimension. If encountered, clayey native soils may be blended with granular soils and reused in non - structural fill areas. Imported fill beneath structures, pavements and walks should have an expansion index less than or equal to 30 (per UBC Table 18 -I -B) with less than 35 percent passing the no. 200 sieve. 5.7 Foundations and Slab Recommendations The following recommendations are for preliminary planning purposes only. Based on the anticipated low expansion potential of on -site soils, recommended foundations consist of reinforced footings/slabs -on -grade or post - tension systems. Recommendations provided below are for standard reinforced footings/slabs -on -grade construction. If post- tension foundation systems are selected, additional recommendations will be provided. Foundation recommendations should be reviewed after completion of earthwork and soil testing. r.ko...:..w IlL I a^ I!L1l I/ltM'TO.. I l.vl.�. r..�.....w.:..i �... Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 13 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 5.7.1 Foundations Continuous and isolated spread footings embedded a minimum of 12 inches into Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics or 18 inches into properly recompacted fill are suitable for use at this site. However, footings should not straddle cut/fill interfaces. Foundation dimensions and reinforcement should be based on allowable bearing values of 2,000 pounds per square foot (pso for footings founded on properly compacted fill. For footings founded directly on the Jurassic Santiago Peak Volcanics an allowable bearing value of 3,000 psf should be used to calculate foundation dimensions and reinforcement. The allowable bearing value may be increased by one third for short duration loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces. Footings should be at least 12 inches wide and 18 inches below the lowest adjacent subgrade. Minimum reinforcement for continuous footings should consist of two ##5 reinforcing bars; one placed near the top and one placed near the bottom. Isolated footing reinforcement should be designed by the project structural engineer. The structural engineer should also provide recommendations for reinforcement of any deepened spread footings and footings with pipe penetrations. 5.7.2 Foundation Settlement The potential for foundation settlement should be analyzed once actual foundation loads and final as- graded conditions are known. In general, for the anticipated residential construction, Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 14 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 maximum total and differential settlement are expected to be about I inch and 1/2 inch, respectively. 5.7.3 Foundation Setback Footings should be designed such that the minimum horizontal distance from the face of adjacent slopes to the bottom outer edge of the footing is a minimum of 10 feet. 5.7.4 Concrete Slabs Lightly loaded concrete slabs should be a minimum of four inches thick over a three -inch layer of compacted Class II base material. Minimum slab reinforcement should consist of #4 reinforcing bars placed on 18 -inch centers each way at mid -slab height. A vapor barrier of ten -mil visqueen placed in the middle of four -inch thick layer of crushed aggregated should be installed beneath moisture sensitive slab areas. 5.8 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures The following recommendations may be used for shallow footings on the site. Foundations placed in firm, well compacted fill material or competent formation may be designed using a coefficient of friction of 0.35 (total frictional resistance equals coefficient of friction times the dead load). A design passive resistance value of 300 pounds per square foot per foot of depth (with a maximum as the sum of the frictional resistance and the passive resistance, provided the passive resistance does not exceed two- thirds of the total allowable resistance. Retaining walls up to ten feet high and backfilled using granular soils may be designed using the equivalent fluid weights given in Table 4 below. immir.. Irll�k r r....r .,.r,.:,..i � Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 15 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 TABLE 4 EQUIVALENT FLUID UNIT WEIGHTS (pounds per cubic foot WALL TYPE LEVEL BACKFILL SLOPE BACKFILL 2:1 ORIZONCAL: VERTICAL CANTII EVER WALL 38 60 YIELDING RESTRAINED WALL 58 90 The above values assume non- expansive backfill and free draining conditions. Measures should be taken to prevent a moisture buildup behind all retaining walls. Drainage measures should include free draining backfill materials and perforated drains. Figure 3 provides recommended gravel and perforated pipe drainage system. These drains should discharge to an appropriate offsite location. 5.9 Exterior Flatwork To reduce the potential for unsightly cracking we recommend that flatwork be installed with crack- control joints at appropriate spacing as designed by the project architect. Flatwork, which should be installed with crack control joints, includes driveways, sidewalks, and architectural features. All subgrade should be prepared according to the earthwork recommendations previously given before placing concrete. Positive drainage should be established and maintained next to all flatwork. 5.10 Drainage Surface runoff should be collected and directed away from improvements by appropriate erosion reducing devices. Positive drainage should also be established around the proposed improvements. The project civil engineer should thoroughly evaluate the on -site drainage and make provisions necessary to keep surface water from affecting the site. c.Xo..,:..-.. I n'M 11., i n 11 %I c... ri..n.�. n.,....�..:,..i .r,,,. Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 16 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 5.11 Asphalt Pavements Pavement sections presented below are based on a Resistance "R" Value testing of representative surficial materials. The upper one -foot of native soils underlying all pavement sections should be appropriately moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the laboratory determined maximum density. Additionally, base materials should be appropriately moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the laboratory determined maximum density. The asphalt pavement design is based on California Department of Transportation Highway Manual and on traffic indexes as indicated in Table 5 below. Upon completion of finish grading, we recommend that additional sampling and testing of subgrade soils should occur and the pavement section modified, if necessary. TABLE 5 ASPHALTPAVEMENf Traffic Area Traffic Index Subgrade AC Class Q "R" Value Thickness Aggregate Base (inches) Thickness inches Local Surface 5.0 43 4.0 6.0 Streets 5.12 Slopes Although existing slopes on this site should be grossly stable, the soils will be somewhat erodible. Therefore, runoff water should not be permitted to drain over the edges of slopes unless that water is confined to properly designed and constructed drainage facilities. Erosion resistant vegetation should be maintained on the face of all slopes. Typically, soils along the top portion of a fill slope FAG..: . Il IMl ., 1lLtNVNIfL'10'I')t0.+ II..A... rlw_k.i...l A Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 17 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 face will tend to creep laterally. Therefore, we do not recommend distress sensitive hardscape improvements be constructed within five feet of slope crests in fill areas. Proposed fill and cut slopes should be constructed at gradients of 2:1 (horizontal: vertical) or flatter. All slopes should be evaluated by CTE to verify that conditions are as anticipated. 5.13 Construction Observation The recommendations provided in this report are based on preliminary design information for the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions found in the exploratory locations. The interpolated subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during construction to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Recommendations provided in this report are based on the understanding and assumption that CTE will provide the observation and testing services for the project. All earthworks should be observed and tested to verify that grading activity has been performed according to the recommendations contained within this report. All footing trenches should be evaluated by the project engineer before reinforcing steel placement. 5.14 Plan Review CTE should review the project foundation plans and grading plans before commencement of earthwork to identify potential conflicts with the recommendations contained in this report. c.�o.,.:..+.1�'ml... Ff..- -r - ..I...:�.�A.r Update Geotechnical Investigation Page 18 Adam's Run Proposed Four -Unit Development, Olivenhain, California September 7, 2000 CTE Project No. 10 -2972 6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION The field evaluation, laboratory testing and geotechnical analysis presented in this report have been conducted according to current engineering practice and the standard of care exercised by reputable geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the conclusions, recommendations and opinions expressed in this report. Variations may exist and conditions not observed or described in this report may be encountered during construction. Our conclusions and recommendations are based on an analysis of the observed conditions. If conditions different from those described in this report are encountered, our office should be notified and additional recommendations, if required, will be provided upon request. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. Qa;FESS� -�. EE odn D. allard, GE #2173 <<0.l 0. �q. Kc Jo G #2136 Geotechnical Engineering M jki - enio (3 A 1 Fo eologist 140.2:'3 4 c' s No. 21x6 a, \,r ' "b�CFrei \Gp P U o I J ~ �OFCA 1WQ (P 00MACN�Q?\Q DOVE HOLLOW ROAD � t I I ST -2 t I TP -4® I t � ST -3 ST -I t TP -5 1 TP -3 t � ST -4 t I I I I t TP -2 t OlprO LEGEND I CRO�S� TP -6 ' ® I � TP -I t TP -9 t APPROXIMATE TEST PIT ® LOCATION t ST -5 TP -I t STI APPROXIMATE SEISMIC TRAVERSE LOCATION t TP -7 , PROPERTY BOUNDARY I TP -8 I ® T ®o A PROPOSED BUILDING FORTUNA RANCH ROAD CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP 10 -2972 GFDiECTNI ANDCONSIRIKf ENONPDtINOTE4iW0ANDNSPECDON RANCHO FORTUNA NO SCALE 14II VINEYARD AVEM/E, S1EO FSCONOIDO CA V10;9()6p1]16J %) FORTUNA RANCH ROAD �M'c ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA . 8/98 FIGURE 2 El RETAINING W Qpv ° o 000a ° Q ° e00 � op a ° pv i °0 0 1 ►e• ° v . 0 FINISH GRADE o .ten 00 ° a ° v WALL FOOTING r Q ^ c WALL BACKFILL COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY 3/4" GRAVEL SURROUNDED BY FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 140 N, OR EQUIVALENT) 11 4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR EQUIVALENT). MINIMUM 1% GRADIENT TO SUITABLE OUTLET 'N MINIMUM 6" LAYER OF FILTER ROCK UNDERLYING PIPE ' CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. GF.DIF1Td1CAl AND CONSTRUCTION FNGNT3 cTESII AND°151K.r1 111'V AADAVf]V11FMG ESCDImmOCA4301 (W)1{ "5 E�ll••IM RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL I0 -2972 RANCHO FORTUNA NO SCALE FORTUNA RANCH ROAD APPENDIX A REFERENCES CITED vna..:. 1« lmI. Ii..n...r w..�,..�a.. REFERENCES CITED 1. Hart, Earl W., Revised 1994, "Fault- Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist Priolo, Special Studies Zones Act of 1972," California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42. 2. Construction Testing and Engineering, Inc., 1998, "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Four -Unit Rancho Fortuna Development, Olivenhain, California ", [consultant report]. 3. Jennings, Charles W., revised 1987, "Fault Map of California with Locations of Volcanoes, Thermal Springs and Thermal Wells." 4. Tan, S.S. and Giffen, D.G., 1995, "Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, San Diego County California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Landslide Hazard Identification Map No. 35. 5. Tan, S.S. and Kennedy, M.P., 1996, "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern part of the San Diego County California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report No. 96 -02. .. EXPLORATION LOGS CONSTRUCTION TESTING "GINEERING, INC. 0 OEOTECNNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENOIN, TESTING AND INSPECTION 1616 YINEYA ED AVENUE. JUITE 0 SSCONDIUO CA 12019 (1601 H6.6H5 M ISVOE0:f, PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPWNT CIE JOB NO: 10.2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 310B TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DAR:: 7/27/9a LOGGED BY: V.BJt.BO ELEVATION: 4 TEST PIT RECORD: TP -I Laboratory Tests DESCRIPTION NIL ML ILI 5 Q TOPSOIL: Loose, drv. light to medium brown, sandy SILT, with organics (roots, rootlets) with occasional cobble to small boulder size volcanics at depth. 20 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, drv. light grayish tan with orange to red brown. clayey volcanics, excavates as sandy SILT, vesicular, tuflaceous texture, iron oxide strong along fractures. areas of mottled, very weathered, very iron stained material with increased red brown clay. 0 Dense, as above, slightly vesicular with ma is inclusions, iron oxide strong along fractures. Density increases with depth. Fracture pattern trending northwest, dipping approximately 60' west. Total depth = 3' Difficult to excavate at 3' No groundwater encountered a,,CONSTRUCTION TESTING NGINEERING, INC. O OEOTECNNICAL AND CONITIOCTION ENOII J TEli1NO AND INIPECTION }4I4 VINEYARD AVENUE. lUIiE O 6lCOM1...s0 CA 92021 (160) 146.4951 .ULLTIP! ' PROJECT: RANCHO FOR7UNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CTE JOB 1& 10.1972 EXCAVATION METI IOD: JOHN DEERE 3108 TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7/27198 LAGGED BY. V.BB.BO ELEVATION: TEST PIT RECORD: TP -2 Laboratory Tests DESCRIPTION NIL 0 Mt. © 3 m2 5 0 TOPSOIL: loose, dry, light to medium brown, sandy SILT with organics and cobble size volcalllcS. © JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, dry, light tan with light gray and orange brown, volcanics, very weathered, excavates as fine sandy SILT to SILT. Iron oxide locally very strong along fractures and in pockets, very minor organics. Density increases with depth. © Very dense, dry, medium gray. volcanics, iron oxide throughout and locally very strong. Steeply dipping fractures trending approximately N35W. Total depth = 3' Refusal to further excavation at 3' No groundwater encountered CONSTRUCTION TESTING NGINEERING, INC. 0 OEOTECNNICAI, AND CONSTRUCTION EHOIH TESTINU AND INSPECTION C • 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE O ESCON.. d CA, 92019 (1601 765 ISIS ENQIQ4 '! ' PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CIE 309 NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION IVIMOD: JOHN DEERE 3108 TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7/27/98 .000EDBY: V.BR80 ELEVATION: c A. CS z ' U 'e� '5 TEST PIT RECORD: TP -3 Laboratory Tests DESCRIPTION ML ML 1 3 5 �l TOPSOIL: loose, dry, light to medium brown, sandy SILT with organics (roots, grass, rootlets), occasional coarse gravel to cobble size volcanics. Q JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, dark orange brown with light tan and greenish tan, volcanics, very weathered, excavates as sandy SILT, iron stain throughout and locally very strong in Dockets and fractures. Q Medium dense to dense, mottled, volcanics. with slightly tuffaceous texture. iron stain locally very strong, mostly along fractures, density increases with depth. Fractures trending approximately S70E, dipping approximately 60'N. Total depth = 2'2" Refusal to further excavation at 27 No groundwater encountered ;A a4CONSTRUCTION TESTING IGINEERING, INC. o UEOTECNNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENDIN TESTINO AND INSPECTION ISIS VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE O LSCONOwO CA 91029 )40 �9 C:cirtF ( 1 H0 ff PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CTE JOB NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION WI IOD: JOHN DEERE 310B TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7/27M I.000ED BY: V.011J30 ELEVATION. o � a N Vi � TEST PIT RECORD: TP -4 Laboratory Tests eu DESCRIPTION Nit- nu, a 5 QI TOPSOIL: Loose, dry, light to medium brown, sandy SILT with organics (roots, grass, rootlets), occasional coarse gravel to cobble size volcanics. Q JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense to dense. dry, dark orange brown with light tan and dark grav, very weathered, excavates as fine sandy SILT to SILT, iron oxide throughout and very strong locally and on fractures, manganese stain, occasional organics, density increases with depth. Dense to very dense, dry. medium gray with dark orange brown, volcanics, as above, less weathered, iron oxide throughout and strong on fractures. Occasional organics in fractures. Total depth = 3.5' Difficult to excavate at 3.5' No groundwater encountered AM ONSTRUCTION TESTING IGINEERING, INC. OHOTECHNICAI ANO CONftRUCT10N ENDIN TEITINO AND IHf YECTIJN t 24 14 VINEYARD AV ENU E, SUITE ElCDN p...J CA 93010. (Ll)L4O >! R:LRLLF ' PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR. SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CTE JOB NO 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METI IOD: JOHN DEERE J IOB TURBO BACVJIOE EXCAVATION DATE: W27N8 LOGGED BY: V.BFT ELEVATION: �pp TEST PIT RECORD: TP -5 Laboratory Tests c h U ti a 5 DESCRIPTION NIL ML 1 NIL 0 5 �I TOPSOIL: Loose, drv, light to medium brown, sandy SILT with organics. 02 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, drv, light brown to tan with orange brown, excavates as sandv SILT, occasional organics. Residual Soil. �3 Medium dense to dense, dry to moist, dark orange to red brown with light grayish tan. weathered volcanics, breccia texture, excavates as clavev sandv SILT, trace clay. Abundant iron staining throughout and strong locally, occasional organic material, increased densitv and decreased weathering with depth. Total depth = 2.5' Difficult to excavate at 2.5' No groundwater encountered. FIGURE I 5 CONSTRUCTION TESTING NGINEERING, INC. /i O GEOTECNNICA4 AND CONSTEUC TION ENOIN J TESTING AND INSPECTION I416 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE O ESCONDIDO CA. PTO, (160) 116.1910 br G PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEW EQUIPMENT CIE O: JOB N10-2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 3IOB TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 72798 LOGGED BY: S. DIEM - ELEVATION: TEST PIT RECORD: TP -6 Laboratory Tests a a & In DESCRIPTION 0 SC -SM 01 TOPSOIL: Loose, drv, reddish brown, clavev siltv SAND with organics (weeds, rootlets). �2 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Very dense, drv, alive to reddish brown, clavev siltv fine SAND. abundant iron staining fractured. Total deoth = 3.5' Difficult to excavate at 35' No groundwater encountered s CONSTRUCTION TESTING NGINEERING, INC. 40+ s OEOTECNNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENOII , TESTING AND INSPECTION CJ' 5611 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE O ESCON-.O CA, 93019 1160) 546. 935 C.L PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CTF JOB NO: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 3108 TURBO BACKHOF. VACAVAI ION DATIf 7Q7NJa LOGGED BY: V.BILBO EI- EVA11ON. -- __ —� gg. TEST PIT RECORD: TP -7 Laboratory Tests DESCRIPTION SC -SM 5 []I TOPSOIL: Loose, dry to moist, medium brown, clayey sandy SILT to silty SAND with organics (roots, rootlets) with occasional cobble size volcanics. �f2 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense to dense, dry to moist, dark orange to red brown with light tan, excavates as clayey silty SAND. Abundant iron staining throughout, very weathered. 0 Dense to very dense, dry to moist, dark orange brown and medium greenish gray, volcamcs, tine plagioclase phenocrysts, abundant iron oxide on fractures, clav on fractures, areas of less comment material steep fractures trending anoroximately NIOW. Total depth = 63" Difficult to excavate at 613" No groundwater encountered CONSTRUCTION TESTING `JGINEER[NG, INC. s OEOTECNNICAI AND CONSTRUCTION ENOh O TESTINU AND IN3YECTION AA 1 5119 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITED E3CDNU100 CA. 9I029 (760) 116-491S p:[LQT m6re PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT JOB NO 10-2972 EXCAVATION M=- IOD: JOHN DEERE 310B TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7/27198 LOWED BY: V.Ba.BO ELEVATION: C ✓� 6 r TEST PIT RECORD: TP -8 Laboratory Tests DESCRIPTION x: CL -MI. Q TOPSOIL: Loose to medium dense, dry to moist, medium to dark brown. silty sandv CLAY to clavev SAND with abundant organic material (roots, weeds, rootlets). JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense to dense, dry to moist. greenish gra with orange brown, excavates as sandv CLAY. Areas of more competent angular volcanic fragments to 1/2 ", iron oxide throughout and locally strong. occasional organics. Very weathered. © Dense to very dense, dry to moist, medium greenish gray. volcanics. abundant iron oxide, very strong on fracture surface, manganese stain. areas of more weathered material, occasional organics and trace clav on fractures. Total depth = 8.5' Difficult to excavate at 8.5' No groundwater encountered *� CONSTRUCTION TESTING NGINEERING, INC. o OEOTECNNICAL AND CONSTSVCTION ENGI. O TESTING AND INSPECTION ]41] VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE O 6lC ONu WO CA. Slp]p (7pp) 746-4955 0 GY6T '� OJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPhNNT CTE 10B NO: 10.2977 EXCAVATION ME MOD: JOIN DEERE 31013 TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7/27M WGGED BY: V.BH-B0 ELEVATION: � TEST PIT RECORD: TP -9 Laboratory Tests DESCRIPTION Sc SC -sm ED TOPSOIL: Loose, dry to moist, medium brown, clayey sandy SILT to silty SAND with organics (roots, rootlets). occasional cobble size volcanics. Q2 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense to dense, dry, medium brown with orange brown, excavates as clayey SAND, very weathered with angular volcanic fragments. 03 Medium dense to dense, drv, mottled, greenish gray with orange brown, very weathered volcanics, araillic alteration, excavates as clayey siltv medium to coarse SAND. Density increases with depth, abundant iron oxide, strong in Pockets and on fractures. Q Dense to very dense, drv, strong, greenish grav, volcanics, with abundant iron oxide. less weathered than above, blockv. sandy areas, grav clay on fractures. Total depth = h Y Refusal to further excavation at 8.5' No groundwater encountered t4CONSTRUCTION TESTING NGINEERING, INC. o OEOTE CHNICAE AND CONli RUC TIOH ENO1. O Tfi WINO AND INSPECTION 2611 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE O ESCON-OU CA 6 2011 (160) 146.011 .06F PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR: SAN DIEGO EQUIPMENT CM JOB t30: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE 310B TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 7/27/98 L,OGOED BY: V.BBEO ELEVATION: � TEST PIT RECORD: TP -l0a (South Wall) Laboratory Tests DESCRIPTION Sc SM CL -ML SC -SM 5 4 Q TOPSOIL: Medium dense, dry to moist, medium to dark reddish brown, clavev, silty SAND to sandv CLAY with organics (roots, rootlets), occasional weathered Volcanic fragments at depth. increased clav at depth. Q Increased density, increased clav from above. Q JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, moist, light greenish gray, excavates as clavev silty fine SAND with gravel to cobble size volcanic fragments. Very weathered. ® Dense to very dense, dry to moist, dark orange brown with red brown and Rreenish gran, volcanics. abundant iron oxide mostly on fractures. clav on fractures. 7 otal depth = 7.5- Difficult to excavate at 7.5' No groundwater encountered �,CONSTRUCTIONNTTESTINNG NGINEERINGt.DINC. ,)A 2616 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE D ESCON—oo CA. 92929 (76D) 141-4953 fN�IRF '. PROJECT: RANCHO FORTUNA EXCAVATOR. SAN DiEGo EQUIPMENT CTE JOB Imo: 10 -2972 EXCAVATION METHOD: JOHN DEERE J 10B TURBO BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 727198 LOGGED BY: V.BILBO ELEVATION: TEST PIT RECORD: TP -10b (North Wall) Laboratory Tests U Co CL -MI. O ED SC ED 5 01 TOPSOIL: Medium dense, dry to moist, medium to dark reddish brown. clayey siltv SAND to sandy CLAY with organics (roots, rootlets). Occasional weathered volcanic fragments at depth, increased clay at depth. Q2 Increased density. increased red brown clay. 03 JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS: Medium dense, moist, greenish gray. excavates as clavev SAND with volcanic fragments, areas of sandy material, minor iron oxide throughout. ® Dense to very dense, dry to moist, dark orange brown with red brown and greenish gray. volcanics, abundant iron oxide, mostly on fractures, clay on fractures. Total depth = 7.5' Difficult to excavate at 7.5' No groundwater encountered APPENDIX C STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING c•�w..:w. ir��mi «. �n.�mmin.�on�o.. ��..n.�. rw..l.. :...i n... Appendix C Specifications for Grading APPENDIX C STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING PROJECTS Section I - General C -5 The guidelines contained herein and the standard details attached hereto represent Construction Testing & Engineering's standard recommendations for grading and other associated operations on construction projects. These guidelines should be considered a portion of the project specifications. Recommendations contained in the body of the previously presented soils report shall supersede the recommendations and or requirements as specified herein. Disputes arising out of interpretation of the recommendations contained in the soils report or specifications contained herein shall be interpreted by the project geotechnical consultant. Section 2 - Responsibilities of Proiect Personnel The geotechnical consultant should provide observation and testing services sufficient to assure that geotechnical construction is performed in general conformance with project specifications and standard grading practices. The geotechnical consultant should report any deviations to the client or his authorized representative. The Client should be chiefly responsible for all aspects of the project. He or his authorized representative has the responsibility of reviewing the findings and recommendations of the geotechnical consultant. He shall authorize or cause to have authorized the Contractor and/or other consultants to perform work and/or provide services. During grading the Client or his authorized representative should remain on -site or should remain reasonably accessible to all concerned parties in order to make decisions necessary to maintain the flow of the project. The Contractor should be responsible for the safety of the project and satisfactory completion of all grading and other associated operations on construction projects, including, but not limited to, earthwork in accordance with the project plans, specifications and controlling agency requirements. Section 3 - Preconstruction Meetine A preconstruction site meeting shall be arranged by the owner and/or client and shall include the grading contractor, the design engineer, the geotechnical consultant, owner's representative and representatives of the appropriate governing authorities. Section 4 - Site Preparation The client or contractor should obtain the required approvals from the controlling authorities for the project prior, during and/or after demolition, site preparation and removals, etc. The appropriate approvals should be obtained prior to proceeding with grading operations. Appendix C C -6 Specifications for Grading Clearing and grubbing should consist of the removal of vegetation such as brush, grass, woods, stumps, trees, root of trees and otherwise deleterious natural materials from the areas to be graded. Clearing and grubbing should extend to the outside of all proposed excavation and fill areas. Demolition should include removal of buildings, structures, foundations, reservoirs, utilities (including underground pipelines, septic tanks, leach fields, seepage pits, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, etc.) and other man-made surface and subsurface improvements from the areas to be graded. Demolition of utilities should include proper capping and/or rerouting pipelines at the project perimeter and cutoff and capping of wells in accordance with the requirements of the governing authorities and the recommendations of the geotechnical consultant at the time of demolition. Trees, plants or man-made improvements not planned to be removed or demolished should be protected by the contractor from damage or injury. Debris generated during clearing, grubbing and/or demolition operations should be wasted from areas to be graded and disposed off -site. Clearing, grubbing and demolition operations should be performed under the observation of the geotechnical consultant. Section 5 - Site Protection Protection of the site during the period of grading should be the responsibility of the contractor. Unless other provisions are made in writing and agreed upon among the concerned parties, completion of a portion of the project should not be considered to preclude that portion or adjacent areas from the requirements for site protection until such time as the entire project is complete as identified by the geotechnical consultant, the client and the regulating agencies. Precautions should be taken during the performance of site clearing, excavations and grading to protect the work site from flooding, ponding or inundation by poor or improper surface drainage. Temporary provisions should be made during the rainy season to adequately direct surface drainage away from and off the work site. Where low areas cannot be avoided, pumps should be kept on hand to continually remove water during periods of rainfall. Rain related damage should be considered to include, but may not be limited to, erosion, silting, saturation, swelling, structural distress and other adverse conditigns as determined by the geotechnical consultant. Soil adversely affected should be classified as unsuitable materials and should be subject to overexcavation and replacement with compacted fill or other remedial grading as recommended by the geotechnical consultant. The contractor should be responsible for the stability of all temporary excavations. Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant pertaining to temporary excavations (e.g., backcuts) are made in consideration of stability of the completed project and, therefore, should not be considered to preclude the responsibilities of the contractor. Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant should not be considered to preclude requirements that are more restrictive by the regulating agencies. The contractor should provide during periods of extensive rainfall plastic sheeting to prevent unprotected slopes from becoming saturated and unstable. When deemed Appendix C C -7 Specifications for Grading appropriate by the geotechnical consultant or governing agencies the contractor shall install checkdams, desilting basins, sand bags or other drainage control measures. In relatively level areas and/or slope areas, where saturated soil and/or erosion gullies exist to depths of greater than 1.0 foot, they should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill in accordance with the applicable specifications. Where affected materials exist to depths of 1.0 foot or less below proposed finished grade, remedial grading by moisture conditioning in- place, followed by thorough recompaction in accordance with the applicable grading guidelines herein may be attempted. If the desired results are not achieved, all affected materials should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill in accordance with the slope repair recommendations herein. If field conditions dictate, other slope repair procedures may be recommended by the geotechnical consultant. Section 6 - Excavations 6.1 Unsuitable Materials Materials that are unsuitable should be excavated under observation and recommendations of the geotechnical consultant. Unsuitable materials include, but may not be limited to, dry, loose, soft, wet, organic compressible natural soils and fractured, weathered, soft bedrock and nonengineered or otherwise deleterious fill materials. Material identified by the geotechnical consultant as unsatisfactory due to its moisture conditions should be overexcavated, moisture conditioned as needed, to a uniform at or above optimum moisture condition before placement as compacted fill. If during the course of grading adverse geotechnical conditions are exposed which were not anticipated in the preliminary soil report as determined by the geotechnical consultant additional exploration, analyzation and treatment of these problems may be recommended. 6.2 Cut Slopes Unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant and approved by the regulating agencies, permanent cut slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 (horizontal: vertical). The geotechnical consultant should observe cut slope excavation and if these excavations expose loose cohesionless, significantly fractured or otherwise unsuitable material, the materials should be overexcavated and replaced with a compacted stabilization fill. If encountered specific cross section details should be obtained from the Geotechnical Consultant. When extensive cut slopes are excavated or these cut slopes are made in the direction of the prevailing drainage, a non - erodible diversion swale (brow ditch) should be provided at the top of the slope. 6.3 Pad Areas Appendix C C -8 Specifications for Grading All lot pad areas, including side yard terrace containing both cut and fill materials, transitions, located less than 3 feet deep should be overexcavated to a depth of 3 feet and replaced with a uniform compacted fill blanket of 3 feet. Actual depth of overexcavation may vary and should be delineated by the geotechnical consultant during grading. For pad areas created above cut or natural slopes, positive drainage should be established away from the top -of- slope. This may be accomplished utilizing a berm drainage swale and/or an appropriate pad gradient. A gradient in soil areas away from the top -of- slopes of 2 percent or greater is recommended. Section 7 - Compacted Fill All fill materials should have fill quality, placement, conditioning and compaction as specified below or as approved by the geotechnical consultant. 7.1 Fill Material Ouality Excavated on -site or import materials which are acceptable to the geotechnical consultant may be utilized as compacted fill, provided trash, vegetation and other deleterious materials are removed prior to placement. All import materials anticipated for use on -site should be sampled tested and approved prior to and placement is in conformance with the requirements outlined. Rocks 12 inches in maximum and smaller may be utilized within compacted fill provided sufficient fill material is placed and thoroughly compacted over and around all rock to effectively fill rock voids. The amount of rock should not exceed 40 percent by dry weight passing the 3/4 -inch sieve. The geotechnical consultant may vary those requirements as field conditions dictate. Where rocks greater than 12 inches but less than four feet of maximum dimension are generated during grading, or otherwise desired to be placed within an engineered fill, special handling in accordance with attached Plates and described below. Rocks greater than four feet should be broken down or disposed off -site. 7.2 Placement of Fill Prior to placement of fill, material the geotechnical consultant should inspect the area to receive fill. After inspection and approval, the exposed ground surface should be scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches. The scarified material should be conditioned (i.e. moisture added or air dried by continued discing) to achieve a moisture content at or slightly above optimum moisture conditions and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum density or as otherwise recommended in the soils report or by appropriate government agencies. Compacted fill should then be placed in thin horizontal lifts not exceeding eight inches in loose thickness prior to compaction. Each lift should be moisture conditioned as needed, thoroughly blended to achieve a consistent moisture content at or slightly above optimum and thoroughly Appendix C C -9 Specifications for Grading compacted by mechanical methods to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum dry density. Each lift should be treated in a like manner until the desired finished grades are achieved. The contractor should have suitable and sufficient mechanical compaction equipment and watering apparatus on the job site to handle the amount of fill being placed in consideration of moisture retention properties of the materials and weather conditions. When placing fill in horizontal lifts adjacent to areas sloping steeper than 5:1 (horizontal: vertical), horizontal keys and vertical benches should be excavated into the adjacent slope area. Keying and benching should be sufficient to provide at least six-foot wide benches and a minimum of four feet of vertical bench height within the firm natural ground, firm bedrock or engineered compacted fill. No compacted fill should be placed in an area after keying and benching until the area has been reviewed by the geotechnical consultant. Material generated by the benching operation should be moved sufficiently away from the bench area to allow for the recommended review of the horizontal bench prior to placement of fill. Within a single fill area where grading procedures dictate two or more separate fills, temporary slopes (false slopes) may be created. When placing fill adjacent to a false slope, benching should be conducted in the same manner as above described. At least a 3 -foot vertical bench should be established within the firm core of adjacent approved compacted fill prior to placement of additional fill. Benching should proceed in at least 3 -foot vertical increments until the desired fmished grades are achieved. Prior to placement of additional compacted fill following an overnight or other grading delay, the exposed surface or previously compacted fill should be processed by scarification, moisture conditioning as needed to at or slightly above optimum moisture content, thoroughly blended and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum dry density. Where unsuitable materials exist to depths of greater than one foot, the unsuitable materials should be overexcavated. Following a period of flooding, rainfall or over-watering by other means, no additional fill should be placed until damage assessments have been made and remedial grading performed as described herein. Rocks 12 inch in maximum dimension and smaller may be utilized in the compacted fill provided the fill is placed and thoroughly compacted over and around all rock. No oversize material should be used within 3 feet of finished pad grade and within 1 foot of other compacted fill areas. Rocks 12 inches up to four feet maximum dimension should be placed below the upper 5 feet of any fill and should not be closer than 11 feet to any slope face. These recommendations could vary as locations of improvements dictate. Where practical, oversized material should not be placed below areas where structures or deep utilities are proposed. Oversized material should be placed in windrows on a clean, overexcavated or unyielding compacted fill or firm natural ground surface. Select native or imported granular soil (S.E. 30 or higher) should be placed and thoroughly flooded over and around all windrowed rock, such that voids are filled. Windrows of oversized material should be staggered so those successive strata of oversized material are not in the same vertical plane. G \�;: t, IA-IM1 rn 111.1NYI11h10'l'110.V 1 f..A­ Acv. Appendix C C -10 Specifications for Grading It may be possible to dispose of individual larger rock as field conditions dictate and as recommended by the geotechnical consultant at the time of placement. The contractor should assist the geotechnical consultant and/or his representative by digging test pits for removal determinations and/or for testing compacted fill. The contractor should provide this work at no additional cost to the owner or contractor's client. Fill should be tested by the geotechnical consultant for compliance with the recommended relative compaction and moisture conditions. Field density testing should conform to ASTM Method of Test D 1556 -82, D 2922 -81. Tests should be conducted at a minimum of two vertical feet or 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. Actual test intervals may vary as field conditions dictate. Fill found not to be in conformance with the grading recommendations should be removed or otherwise handled as recommended by the geotechnical consultant. 7.3 Fill Slopes Unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant and approved by the regulating agencies, permanent fill slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 (horizontal: vertical). Except as specifically recommended in these grading guidelines compacted fill slopes should be over -built and cut back to grade, exposing the firm, compacted fill inner core. The actual amount of overbuilding may vary as field conditions dictate. If the desired results are not achieved, the existing slopes should be overexcavated and reconstructed under the guidelines of the geotechnical consultant. The degree of overbuilding shall be increased until the desired compacted slope surface condition is achieved. Care should be taken by the contractor to provide thorough mechanical compaction to the outer edge of the overbuilt slope surface. At the discretion of the geotechnical consultant, slope face compaction may be attempted by conventional construction procedures including backrolling. The procedure must create a firmly compacted material throughout the entire depth of the slope face to the surface of the previously compacted firm fill intercore. During grading operations care should be taken to extend compactive effort to the outer edge of the slope. Each lift should extend horizontally to the desired finished slope surface or more as needed to ultimately established desired grades. Grade during construction should not be allowed to roll off at the edge of the slope. It may be helpful to elevate slightly the outer edge of the slope. Slough resulting from the placement of individual lifts should not be allowed to drift down over previous lifts. At intervals not exceeding four feet in vertical slope height or the capability of available equipment, whichever is less, fill slopes should be thoroughly dozer trackrolled. For pad areas above fill slopes, positive drainage should be established away from the top -of- slope. This may be accomplished using a berm and pad gradient of at least 2 percent. c.�a..�.,... I Imi Iti1m %i Ii.,n.�.rw...�.,� -.i n... Appendix C C -11 Specifications for Grading Section 8 - Trench Backfill Utility and/or other excavation of trench backfill should, unless otherwise recommended, be compacted by mechanical means. Unless otherwise recommended, the degree of compaction should be a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density. Within slab areas, but outside the influence of foundations, trenches up to one foot wide and two feet deep may be backfilled with sand and consolidated by jetting, flooding or by mechanical means. If on -site materials are utilized, they should be wheel - rolled, tamped or otherwise compacted to a firm condition. For minor interior trenches, density testing may be deleted or spot testing may be elected if deemed necessary, based on review of backfill operations during construction. It utility contractors indicate that it is undesirable to use compaction equipment in close proximity to a buried conduit, the contractor may elect the utilization of light weight mechanical compaction equipment and/or shading of the conduit with clean, granular material, which should be thoroughly jetted in -place above the conduit, prior to initiating mechanical compaction procedures. Other methods of utility trench compaction may also be appropriate, upon review of the geotechnical consultant at the time of construction. In cases where clean granular materials are proposed for use in lieu of native materials or where flooding or jetting is proposed, the procedures should be considered subject to review by the geotechnical consultant. Clean granular backfill and/or bedding are not recommended in slope areas. Section 9 - Drainage Where deemed appropriate by the geotechnical consultant, canyon subdrain systems should be installed in accordance. Typical subdrains for compacted fill buttresses, slope stabilization or sidehill masses, should be installed in accordance with the specifications of the accompanying attached plates. Roof, pad and slope drainage should be directed away from slopes and areas of structures to suitable disposal areas via non - erodible devices (i.e., gutters, downspouts, and concrete swales) as shown in the attached plates. For drainage in extensively landscaped areas near structures, (i.e., within four feet) a minimum of 5 percent gradient away from the structure should be maintained. Pad drainage of at least 2 percent should be maintained over the remainder of the site. Drainage patterns established at the time of fine grading should be maintained throughout the life of the project. Property owners should be made aware that altering drainage patterns could be detrimental to slope stability and foundation performance. Appendix C C -12 Specifications for Grading Section 10 - Slope Maintenance 10.1 - Landscaae Plants In order to enhance surficial slope stability, slope planting should be accomplished at the completion of grading. Slope planting should consist of deep-rooting vegetation requiring little watering. Plants native to the southern California area and plants relative to native plants are generally desirable. Plants native to other semi -arid and and areas may also be appropriate. A Landscape Architect should be the best party to consult regarding actual types of plants and planting configuration. 10.2 - Irrigation Irrigation pipes should be anchored to slope faces, not placed in trenches excavated into slope faces. Slope irrigation should be minimized. If automatic timing devices are utilized on irrigation systems, provisions should be made for interrupting normal irrigation during periods of rainfall. 10.3 - Reoair As a precautionary measure, plastic sheeting should be readily available, or kept on hand, to protect all slope areas from saturation by periods of heavy or prolonged rainfall. This measure is strongly recommended, beginning with the period prior to landscape planting. If slope failures occur, the geotechnical consultant should be contacted for a field review of site conditions and development of recommendations for evaluation and repair. If slope failures occur because of exposure to period of heavy rainfall, the failure areas and currently unaffected areas should be covered with plastic sheeting to protect against additional saturation. In the accompanying Standard Details, appropriate repair procedures are illustrated for superficial slope failures (i.e., occurring typically within the outer one foot to three feet of a slope face). Cno..,:...... IIIml rv. GAVIDIN ^a NOTES iNE s�ALVOnRoLSPBcxBlLaiionsGF °Da auellclwoRLCSSSE PLANS. CONSTRUCTION, THE OESi 6N CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS OF THE LIT. OF ENCINITAS AND THE SAN DIEGO AREA REGIONAL DARD DRAWINGS. ANY CHANGES OR PEVSOPONS THEREFROM 'HALL EIE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER IOR TO RE DUE S'.' FCR INSPECTION. (HE SOILS REPORT TITLED PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL [N Si 6ATION PROPOSED 4 UNIT RANCHO FOR TUNA "' , IYE.VFAIN. CALIFOPNI A, PREPARED BY'. CONSTRUCTION 'E'1ING 8 ENGINEERING. INC.. DATED: 9- 16 -98. AND UPDATE APPIROVAL OF HIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF SIZIES, LOCATION AND TYPE OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES, NEW OF APPROVALSNAND WITHIN PERMITST FORT THE BETS IS LASE REOUIREO IN WRITTEN PERMISSION SHALL BE OBTAINED FOR ANY OFF -SITE SPACING. CCNGFACTOR SHALL TAKE EESSARY PRECALITSONE REQUIRE ANYTHIINGCDAMAGED OR GRAD ION 71E DEVELOPSR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE THAT ANY MONUMENT OR SETCAH MARK RICH IS BIRTH HER OR DE Si ROY" SHALL 1E E- SS BLI:SHED AND REPLACED BY A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN. CONSTRUCT NO AINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES. INCLUDING SHCRI N6, D SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE "' CONFORMING T ALL LOCAL, STATE AND I'D I- AL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS. LAWS AND l C GRAIIING OPERATIONS SHALL COMMENCE ON IL A PREGRAOING MEETING AS BEEN HELD ONSITE WITH THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE PRESENT CITY IOM ANN LI VIL ENGINEER. SOILS ENGINEER GRADING CONTRACTOR ND PEMMI TTEE THE PREGRADE MEETING SHALL BE SCHEDULED WITH THE CITY AT LEAST AS HOURS IN ROPDSED CONSTRUCTION SITE ITHSN i IS FPOJECT E P W H TH M T EG AND RECEIVE A ROYAL FROM THE DEVI LmEP sHaLL sue 1 R FOR THE PROPOS" HAUL ROUTE THE DEVELOPER SHALL 'IT" ElGINEE 0 T PL V WITH ALL CONDITIONS ANp REQUIREMENTS TEL CI E G INFER MAY IMPOSE WITH REGARDS IN THE HAULING RIEDIIIIII, UFO FINAL COMPLETION OF THE ORK UNDER T E GRADING PERMIT BUT PRIOR 0 FINAL GRADING APPROVAL 0 /OR FINAL RELEASE OF SECURITY, S- GRADED CERTIFICATION SHALL BE FlO VIDEO STATING: "THE GRADING UNDER PERMIT NO. 6277 -G HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN SUBSTANTIAL THE ATTACHED AS IIAOED PLAN ". THIS STATEMENT H FULDLDE BIBIE6HE AIGRAIJ IN6I OPEFATTONI THE OS VIL ENGINEER ALL GRADING SHPLL BE OBSERVED AND TESTED BY A QUALIFIED SOII "i ENGINEER OP UNDER HIS DIRECTION. HE SHALL BSTRVE AND EST E EXCAVATION PLACEMENT AND IANPACTIDN OF ILLS GRADING OSHAT IONS HE SHALL STATE TI AT SEFVAIIONS AND ISIS WERE MADE BY HIM OR UNDER AND SUPERVISION AND I'H IN ISS OPINION, ALL EMBANKMENTS A 0 EXCAVATIONS WERE A CON:BT RAICTE.D IN ACCORDANCE ITH THE APPROVED SPARING PLRANS D A ALT BANKMEIII AND EXCAVATIONS ARE SUET ABLE FOR HEIR INTENDED USE. DAMAC'E TO AEUCE RING PROPERTIES OR i0 FT NIEDED WORK ON THE SITE ANp SHALL TAKE PEMEOIAT MEASURES C PREVENT EROSION OF BESHLY UNTIL SUCH TIME AS PERMANENT A SOARED PEAS DRAINAGE NO EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AVE BEEN INSTALLED NOTIFICATIONS ' 1 ANN STRUCTURESASHHOWNC ONi T UNDERGROUND HESE 'I" WEBB ITITAINES IF AS SEARCH 0 AVAILABLE RECORDS. THEW BEST 0 OF KNOWLEDGE THERE ARE NO EXISTING UTILITIES EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. HOWEVER: NHE CONTRACTOR IS REOUNRED 10 TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY EASDREG TO OTECT EXISTING BTILITIES OR STRUCTURES NLOCATED T THE EEK SITE IT IS T E CONTRACTOR S ESPONSIHILITY TO FONT AD THE TO OWNER A OF SAID I TEL I TIES DR STRUCTDRES PRIOR 0 ANY EXCAVATION. OR ERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND NOTIFICATION OF COMMENCEMENT OF WORK: A. SEWERS - CSD (760) 633 -2770 B. GAS 6 ELECTRIC -SDG6E (8001 422 -4133 ` WATER - OMWD (760)]53 -6466 D. TELEPHONE - PAL -BELL MCI) 489 -3441 E. CABLE TV - (800) 422 -4133 F. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT -1060) 422 -4133 2, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 48 PM ONE- PR1160) O IE.21NNOING ANY WORK ON IS PROJECT, G. THE CONTRACTOR H LL GIVE 24 HOURS NOTICE ON CALLS FOR INSPECTION. PHONE: (760) 633 -2770. ALL WORK REFORM" NITHOUT BEANEFII OF INSPECTION WILL BE SUBJECT TO REJECT D REMOVAL. SOILS ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I. RODNEY C. BALLARD, A REGISTERED ED TECHNICAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF FIELD CALIFORNIA. ICERTSFYUTHAi USSAMPSING TND STUDY OF THELSOILS IL CONDITIONS PREVALENT' WITHIN THIS SITE WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MV DIRECTION BETWEEN THE DATES 07 -27 -98 AND 09- 16 -9B. ONE COMPLETE COPY OF T E SOILS REPORT COMPILE' FROM THIS BTUOV ITH M COMMENDATIONS HAS BEEN SUBMITTED 0 HE C OF THE CITY ENGINEER. H PRATE ETTER 'A"' 1N /A I IURI'HERMORE. I RAVE REVIEHER THERE GRADING PLANS AND CERTIFY T AT i E ECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED IN HE SOILS REANORT FOG HIS PROJECT HAVE BEEN INCORPGRATEI IN THE GRADING PLANS D SPECIFICATIONS. OWNERSCERTIFICAGE: 14, ALL PREAS TO BE FILLED SHALL BE PREPARED TO BE FILLED AND FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITR STANDARD SPELIF ILA'IONS. ALL VEGEIABLT MATTER C DBJELTIONABLE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A REGISTEERED SOILS ENGINEER P GEOLOGIST HAS BEEN OR WILL BO ETAINED T UPERVISE SIGNED: — — bHP GE N0. 2173 EP bYYYy�U . /EMk e" E %P DATE'. JUNE 30. 200 q a cAD DECLARATON OE RESPONSIBLE CHAflGE I HEREBY DECLARE THAI M AM THE ENGINIEEP OF R OR THIS PROJECT. 'HAT I nA E EXERCISER ESPONSIBLE C R E OVER IHE RESIGN OF THE PROJECT AS REFINED IN SECTION E03 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS COOS, AND THAT THE DESIGN IS IY UTHHERCITY OFNENOINIT ASE IS CCNFINECTO RELIEVE ME, AS ENGINEER OF WORK, DESIGN. CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS. AARGXCES ARU.YP A,GFDOESI NET OF MY RESPONSIBILITIES FOR PROJECT FASSp q` , I oeR y? Oi BY: -/ter L^ No. 29577 m a Ex O. 03/39/03 v RATE�dZ ib tiC )3' 'Rq VIA vNE PA 0 R.C. E. 5>7 \CIVIL �OF CAI,1F� OWNERSCERTIFICAGE: 14, ALL PREAS TO BE FILLED SHALL BE PREPARED TO BE FILLED AND FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITR STANDARD SPELIF ILA'IONS. ALL VEGEIABLT MATTER C DBJELTIONABLE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A REGISTEERED SOILS ENGINEER P GEOLOGIST HAS BEEN OR WILL BO ETAINED T UPERVISE iEF -IAL SHALL BE RTMOVFp BY HE CONTRACTOR FROM THE SURFACE UPON WHICH HE ILL IS DBE PLACED LOOSE FILL OVER AS. GRADING IV] A SE ON THE COMPACTION ND $T (LIT T FiSITE.A / AND ALLUVIAL SOILS SHALL E REMOVED TO SUITABLE IRM NF J L CPOUNI E EXPOSED SOILS SHALT BE SCARIFIED TO 1 / A O 6 INCHES ND THEN COMPACTED O A MINIMUM F 0 TO , I F R E T IT SHALT BE E CONTRACTOR B RESPONSIBILITY P(A'E SPREAD. W ER A p COMPACT E ILL IN STREET H qMr Rt/N JOHN o 6 /A✓EXSC,vL OA E CBS oho ALL>RDA CE WIiR SPECIFICATIONS. C .q< P9.mNCe- R C9� /vozU co.ei "... CIiT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE CUT AND TRIMMED TO FINISH GRADE TO PRODUCE SMOOTH SURFACES AND ONS FORM CROSS BECTIONI. E SL PES OF EVE AXONE AND EMBANKMENTS /g c N ,�/ p MVe', abZ 59N a 40/ C9 yA /Pe Cpl G/3259a ENGI NEED OFAWORN ANINEDGE ATN A NI IDAAl ll OMOERLVD BY THE INDEX OF SHEETS CONDITION ALL STONES. ROOTS ANp OTHER STE MATTER E%POEEO OR EXCAVATION OR EMBANKMENT SLOPES WHICH APE SHEET 1 TITLE SHEET LIABLT TO BEGONE SHALL BE REMOV" AND DISPOSED SHEET 3 GRATING LAN SHEET GRADING PLPN FOA01 TOOSENED OG' IE TOE 0 O? OF SLOPES SHALL BE ROUNOEO CCOkpANCE ITH THE GRATING ORDINANCE. (ENTRY SHEET iRAOING PLPN (DOVE HOLLOW ROAD( SHEET 5 PAIL PLAN ]E. ALL TREES. BRUSH. GRASS. AND OTHER OBJECtIONABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE COLLECTED PIE" OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED bF DFF SHEET 6 PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (FORT UNA RANCH A OGDIOOLMELANPLAN (ISHII A RANCH ROPDI THE SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR SO AS TO LEAVE THE AREAS TH T V'S BEEN CLEARED WITH A EAT AND FINISHED APPEARANCE A SHEET 8 EROSION FREE FROM UNSIGHTLY REBRIS. APPROVAL OF LOCATION OF I THE D'B1I5 FIIL SHALL BE SECURED FROM THE SON(DS ENBI "T D CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE DISPOSAL OF 5 TERIAL. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS LANDSCAPING 1. A L S ORES SHALL BE PLANHEO D IRRIGATED IN ACCORDANCE CYTi PI ANND AHPROV" BY E CITY ENGINEER PLANS SHAALL [N OPM o T E CITY F ENCINITAS GRABSNG ORDNANCE D ALL ADOPTED LANDSCAPE A D IRRIGA71DN STANDARDS. F 15N DINT A D PLANTING SHALL BE CCOMPLISHER ON ALL ORES PRIOR 0 OC TOBEP 1 OP OMMEDI ATELY PON CDMPL F.TION OF .ANV SLOPES GRADED.. BETWEEN CTOBER 1 AND APRIL 15. COMMUNITY SERVICES CARDIFF APP�VFC,�„ - I A PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY DF ENCINITAS APPROVED BY BV. _�� BATE 1 - 3A "O STREETEPEGH SPPVIAVS DEPAPTMENL FDR ANY WOPH WITHIN T " DATE: BENCHMARK DESCRIPTION: CO. BENCHMARK "OL -0073" SCALE CHISELED SQUARE IN TOP DE EAoWALL LDCAI'ION: SW CORNER EL CANINE DEL ROABE 6 FlANC D SANTA FE ELF.V ]]9.478 DATUM DR. I HO aDN _ NtA aTTCAI u A GENERAL IMPROVEMENT NOTES WORKTO BEDONE ; :- _ SHEET 21 I A PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY DF ENCINITAS S.D.P.S.D. = SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS STREETEPEGH SPPVIAVS DEPAPTMENL FDR ANY WOPH WITHIN T ITEM B'D R.S.B A SYMBOL GUANTITY _ THE STRUCTURAL SECtIo' SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY -- - .... - ".. OF ENCINITAS STANDARDS AND AS APPROVED BY THE CITY CONEI000iSONI (VALUE TISTS SHALL BE FEUIPED PRIOR TO PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPERTY LINES 0 I APPROVAL OF THESE IMPROVEMENT PLANS AS SHOWN ODES BUT E %ISTING CONTOURS '- CEOCECTUBEUNOAPOVAL OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE THE 9,911 SF (E%CI.UOING ANY E %ISTING pE SLOPES). 2. THE MAXIMUM VERTICAL DEPTH OF LUT IS 8.5 AND THE MAXIMUM 1 EA. VERTICAL HEIGHT OF FILL IS 11.6. CUT J L UN..ROUNO UTILITIES WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY PROPOSED CUT /FILL LINE II — FILL SHALL BE CONSIF BERM, CONNECTED AND TER AO PPIOP TO CONSTPUCTION OF BERM CUPS, CROSS GuiiER ANO PAVING. PROPOSED CONTOURS 0 � ---� I THE ED MINCE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING GNGEHOUGIND PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS 4g0.0 OFCTHETAVAILABLE THERE THESE PECUUDEfTOLTHE HIGH IF CUPEOKNOWLEDGEICH APE NO OTHER E %IS:HNG FACILITIES E %CEPT AS SHOWN ON PLAryIIA HOWEVER. E CONTRALi1ORR 15gPEOULP. TO TARE PROPOSED GRAVEL BAGS (SEE SHEET 6) PROPOSE iY PE "D" PCC BROW DITCH 000a000000 01. EA. . p -75 =.:_> �::.> - S80 LF SHOXNUHEREONYAND SHOW ANYEOTHERPWHICHT IS NOT OFTRECOPNCUPINOT N ON THESE PLANS. pgOPOSEO 2: 3 FILL SLOPE S- S LOCATIDN ANp ELEVATION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MET BY WORK TO BE PONE. SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS PRIOR TO C.,,, CTIDN OF NEW WDRK. ONTIG I WILL MAKE EXPLORATORY EXCAVATIONS ANN LOCATE EXISTING UNp[RGROUNp PROPOSED 2'. 1 CUT SLOPE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE (1% MIN.) (SIZI N6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION MOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO ERIOIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. A.P.N: 4- 451 -05 SREADDBESS FORTUNA RANCH ROAD ENCINITAS. CA. PERMRTEE BENAMEI DEVELOPMENT CORPORAATION 16865 WEST BERNAADO ORI92 385 SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 12] (8581 613 -2990 OWNER COSMO C. CONTE, UP, CARDIFF PROPERTIES ESTIMATED QUANTITIES -UT 9100 C.Y.X =ILL 12000 C. Y. IMPORT 2300 C.Y.* WEDS!" S SUFFICIENTLY AHEAD OF CONSTRUCTIDN TO PERMIT TO PLANS IF BEVISIDNS E NECESSARY BECAUSE OF pgOPOS" PIP -RAP ENERGY DS SSIPATOR (0 -d 0) ; :- _ SHEET 21 21.5 CY ACTUALNOO LTUAL LOLAI ION OF E %ISTING FACILITIES. PROPOSE G" AL DIKE (TYPE "A ") (G -5) SHOWN ON THE BUILT I PTHINTN DRAWINGS ALL BOUBCES SHALL BE COCA E (THIN THE ITHELCITY FIGHT OF 296 LF A ONLYIWORCALCULATEDEI "' ESTIMATE' FBASPERMIACPNAPOSES Y THE CANDAACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE SAN DIET GAS 0 ELEC)TRIC ANN SMALL COGANUGAIEBIII WORIKXWITH COMPANYYREPRESENTATIVES. pgppED C 4 AL DIKE (TYPE "E "1 (G -51 -- 3.090 LF QUANTITIES MAY VARY DUE III SHRINKAGE OR SWELL FACTORS( . NET ICE'. iNIGLPELECTRIC ADDUGAS SERVICES WITHIN ELECTRICAL CABLESFAM GASTPIPING AND PROPOSED CONE. LURE 6 GUTTER TRANSITION PROPOSED MODIFIED ROLLED CURB PER G4 PROPOSED 4" AC PAVEMENT OVER 6" BASE 0 78.95 LF 1, 748.85 LF ENVIRONMENTAL NOTES: 5A 743 SF 1. E STEEPEST E %ISTING LMAN MA THE GRADE AREA IS 24% TELEPHONANCE3' ELEPHONE: 800 422 -4133 1036 AL[PT PROPOSED EARTHEN TRAIL PROPOSED 24' WIDE AC PAVEMENT APRON (OS -]) ff _� 9,911 SF (E%CI.UOING ANY E %ISTING pE SLOPES). 2. THE MAXIMUM VERTICAL DEPTH OF LUT IS 8.5 AND THE MAXIMUM 1 EA. VERTICAL HEIGHT OF FILL IS 11.6. 3 THE LONTPALTOP SHALL NOTIFY PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PRIOR TO STARTING WORK NEAR COMPANY FACILITIES AND SHALL PROPOSE 3 WIDE MOC,GCC DOWNDRAIN (D -22) ## 3 EA. AVERAGE DEPTH VOLUME OF CUi (L.F.) 3. A.I 306 X 2� COORCINATE HIS WORK WITH COMPANY PEPPE6ENTAYIVfS. EXISTING FENCE REMOVAL & RELOCATION - _ 1 97' OF CUT AREA OF GUT (S.F.) 127.131 450 LF NOTICE: ALL TELEPHONE SERVICES WITHIN THIS PROJECT BOUNDARY FOP PROPOSE SLOPE HYDRDSEEO AREA (SEE SHEET ID .., B.I AVEOF F DEPTH = VOLUME OF FILL (C.F.) = 12 000 44,]00 SF OF ILL AREA OF FILL 3�OT0 - 3.31 INSTALLATIONS LOOAIICNCF�T CABLES ANO APPURTENANCES CONTACT pROPOS" "NO DARNING -FIRE LANE" SIGN ® IS.F.) 4 EA ACIFIC BELL IELEPNONf COMPANY TELEPHONE 800 422 4133 (DIG ALIIP PROPOSEG TRAIL "WATER BARS" 1 20 1=A 3 Ii SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER TO PROPOSED "BRUSH CONCRETE" TRAIL % -INS ai RPPOVEN NISD ABCTBEAR THEECOSTBOFSPELOCATIDNSHIFPNEEDED. PROPOSED PLG CROSS GLITTER 6 -13) f0 ALL TELEVISIONS SERVICES I [ IS PROJECT ARE "UN.RGEUND INSTALLATIO S GP LOCATION OF CABLES ISO APPURTENANCES CONTACT: TELE ONE: 1 -800 422 4133 SWRCB NOTE DEVELOP ENT OF THIS PROJECT S HALL CO PL ITF. ALL ReGUt DEMENT NT ]1 POWER SOURCES AND RUNS SE 1 G S EE LIG B SHALL 8E "AS S OF STATE WA ER RESOURCES CONTROL B 0 0 IS CB ORGER Nv 92 O0� -DW G " SHOWN ON THE BUILT I PTHINTN DRAWINGS ALL BOUBCES SHALL BE COCA E (THIN THE ITHELCITY FIGHT OF IN P.'.E S. GENERAL PERMIT ER RUNOF 00 E pISCHARGF PEQU IREMENTS FOP DISCHARGES OF STORM WATER RUNOFF A SOC IATEO ITH ENCINITA3�HIN EASEMENTS OEILATED i0 THE CITY OF ER IGICTION ACTIVIT IN ACCORDANCE WIII SAID PERMIT A STORM TEP OLLUTION PREVENiI0 L N (SWPPPI Np MONITORING PROGRAM PLAN SHALL BE 12 PAVING SHALL 0E PONE UNTtL E %ISiING POWER POLES APE PELOCATEO EXPE OE THE AREAS 10 BE PAVED. REVELOPEB ANp IMPLEMENT EO CONCURRENM WITH THE COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING ACTIVITIES ANB COMPLETE O CCURATU NOTICE -OF- TENSER (NOII 13 WITH iHELCITYFOFEEENCINITASE WHENLRECEIVED; FFURTHER, AT COPY OFATHE CEOPLETTTE CITYCENGINEERPNO YANG IF TOP iC�MAKINGNCHANGESAINOTHEHE FIELD. "' FROM THE SWRCB SHOWING THE PERMIT NUMBER FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY CF ENCINITAS WHEN RECEIVED. 14 ALLSOiNVETOBE ALUMINUM WITH 3 FGOT HIGH INTENSITY TYPE IN AOOITION. HE NDERBIBNEO ANp SUBSEOUPNT OWNER (91 OF ANV 0 TION OF i E PROPERTY COVERED BY TF.IS GRADING ERMIT fi277 -G. D BY SWRCB ORDER NN 92-08 15 OMRACTET HRALL REDDEST FROM THE CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE A FETING ANC SHALL PROVIDE AT LEAST 48 HOURSCOF NOTICE FOR SUCH A MEETING. I]SG- 633-2]701 -TWA. C SUVHELU F AANSIDMENTS T ERETO, SHALL COMPLY ITH SPECS L PROVISION S 0 IN SECTION C. OF SWRCB ROAR Na .92 -0 jl/WB. i6 PRIVATE DEAN IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HEPEN ARE FOP INFORMATION ONLY, AITY OFFICIAL S SIGNATURE HEREON ODES NOT CONSTITUTE G OF ANY KIND FOP APPROV P BILITY THE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTIONROF THESE PRIVATE IMPROVEPRIS. (IF APPLICABLE( OW NE, 0" LAND 17 INAIRELIONi ABOVEVIDE TRUE 9MALUTDFF AND ALLOW 9DANCS rz[[a>�, P- ��,� (J NO EIF 18 HE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE THAT ANY MONUMENT OR BENCH MARK WHICH IS DISTURBED OP DESTROYED SHALL BE RE- ESTABLISHEO — SIGNSTURE Oi LAND OPNER, CORPORATE OFFICER. OATS/ GENERAL PAR NER OR ROPRIETOR A. REPLACED BY A PEISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER DP A LICENSED LANG 19 IHE DEVELOPED SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF EACH SEWER TOf/N F3 /LVFfeWao.c> ___ _, PRINT" NAME OF ABOVE P "SON FO d-,5 //jam ANDS WL. APESPECTIVELY, 2fINCHESIHIGHNINTOETHETEACE DE THE LUPB. 20 MANNER AND LOCEIION APPROVEDLBYETHEIINSPECiOPHE LUPB SN A 2f L WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ALCOFOANCE WITH THE STANDARD SPECTFICATI.1 FOP PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION TRITEST EDIT(DG), TITLE ' THE SAN DIEGO STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS i0 T E STANDARD SPECIFICATIGN5 FOR PUBLIC W0PK5 CONSTRUCTION (ADOPTED BY THE PAN DIE. REGIONAL STANDARDS C.MTTTEE). ANO THE SAN DIEGO EGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS (LATEST EOITIONI. -NO PARKING FIRE LANE" NOTE' PO TE ALL F " 0 PARKING FIRE LASE" SIGNS SHALL BE 5 D N IRE ACCESS ROADS ESS THAN O ET IN WBOTH. CCEES ROAC9 ESS 2 FEET PflNATE BOAT CEflTIFICATION I CEPT [FY THAT THE PRIVATE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON T IS PLAN SATISFIES THE PEOUIPEMENIS AS $I ATE IN THE FINAL ADAM TN I2Tn SHALL BF 03T ED NN BOTH SIDES AND ACCESS REAPS MORE l' AN ,12 FEET BUT LEES THA 40 FEET IN WIDTH SHALL BE POSTED ON ON DNE SIRE ONLY IGNA SHALL BE SPACE:O A MAXIMUM OF SO EET OB CENTER W EN SIGNS RE REQUIRED ON "TH SIDES, HEY SHALL STAGGERED SO HAT T ERE IS DNE POTSCE 1 APPROVAL FOR RON 98 -2>2. AND THE S 1GAROS FOP (1) SIGN A (MUM OF 5 EEl' RIVATE STREETS ON TERNATING SLOF,S OF HE ACCESS BEAR IF) 6IANN EHALLSE PLAINLY ISIBLE FROM ANY LOCATION ON AN ACCESS ROAIIE) SIGNS SHALL BE PER ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDARD$. BY: �! �W1E1 / /L`I DATE WAYNE A ASCO. RCE 295]] pF E55t ^ pP ^0 ai No 29577 - Exp. 03/31/03 , Drt fE GT /o-i 1- .:...... -. RCE No 29571_ ✓ OF VIL rA1lF�� AY f PASCO /03 BPVE� APPROVE 6Y DATE IEVIEWED: PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APP ED ATE dzHI UA BY:LUI,� - -- BY: R.C.EO NO.335]7 DATE: 2 / /a(_ DATED' BY: MATE W NE PASCO E %P X319.3 Gfc�N� 7GGV ' l� KEY MAP U.1 TO ITYLE KEY MAP LEGEND PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXIST. SEWER EXIST. WATER PROPOSED FT RE HY'RANT sN O� W VICINITYMA i OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPAI PLAN FOR: TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN 6277 -G El IN LYNIFACTLp AOTe roVTM m ro IEAIF/ EXACT I[pIZCPrrAL s VEAm LOGTIW CF EXISTING B F'ATERAE IM ro -_ eECaeemc cr cpt;Tncrlw ANV C'IXE'I.ICTS ro se SEE SHEET 7 FDR D+aA+n ro ru A IW o- rrE SEE PlOLIC TRAIL TAILS -.. - I ' ( 'i, 3 __ 212059 1500 �PP 1pVE Np.LBW.- BNCAETE CROSS% ITp�'IV, DOVE HOLLOW 2 BACXl��jj;; RIWRAP EmEa6r ne@ 42?aW 65z56 �D M 1 f OPbSIPpTlF6 PE8.11 dG. h l' -� F -� CENTEI`AU"AE EF POVE HOLLOW flOAp � (1b x6k1b,rRICNI V. 6�- _ I 4 -0]Ztl4 CL i9 BAf/(B'vY. R -RAP ENEAGri - f ? 1 BL56IPATQ9 R3kq'x1 r p r � HILkI T" '. 'f 4,4 ' JM EXysr NG 8 TERISNE ; aaa��y�s-'- 1 All 6 FL E: l PEp OWb 8 TrvsroN " syy .x \ a47-3 tt 1 d5s 4 w ss x n ti toys RUCTION FEIrLE ^. I��PARCEL ] P RrcrNGstcNYC {I a� �' Prprv4PANW e F, 4 ._ b B P� o� Pe1D -158.0 `$ 4fi9 K'T'j E' E o' E �) E g.fS PARCH 3 6IGN wi , tc IT, 16' OR vEwav 44 RM$ 4?e' I ,..J 63 IFlEN FOR \ m T', BA '. � SM R JNTALr Y _ .+ l68 L04 7 IM L IN T-1 R PE b Aaf R k raq I MPN) 4�0 v x 469~L4 E NP a-FL ,rte t � I 9e IAA W 1 hiM ,6 I 4E ^P „PARCEL 2 NO PARKING' 4210' �/ PADwl500'T SIGN PUSLIC TRAIL EASEMENT PUBLIC UTILIT INS AlL B WIDE RECREATIONAL EASEMENT 27' RIVATE ROAD O ,IRA" PFA CITY siANDARDS 5 _I SEWER EASEMENT 12I 25��� S s 1, W'f 6' EL6tE * INSTALL e" RGLLEO cope _ ' - PROPOSED 21 l 2% 0 GUTTER (STD DWG G 41 L �% CUT SLOPE "' ' , +N`L PROPOSED 2'] `� --INSTALL 6" REI_ SO CONE MALL 4° AC FILL SL L I GUTTER (STD DWG G -4) �4R'- PvMi OKF 6 BAEEE J -INSTAL 4" AC PVMT OVER 6" SASE Pcc eRGW G SECTION C -C SECTION A -A: iR 2G w+svEwar DRIVEWAY 24' WIDE PRIVATE ROAD L G ]4 MOOIFSED'FOR NOT TO SCALE bLLEO F,NpB NOr TO SCALE TO 1.5y �- PROPOSED CCESS ROADWAY PER 5837 -G 2. 7 SLOPE D fU B "11TAI L 6" RO LEO LURE 'IT GG41 �..� FG E (SO OWG 64) 1.; ED E i LPOSEOU 1 TY SECTION E -E PUPT L_ e Lam' "' E rsTlmG (FILL BERM) pirr E Io GROUND E cI r s o SECTION 8 B: NET TO scaLE EzFELT" T­1 24 WIDE DRIVEWAY CUT E -TA r.Are'remvf T T AA HP PUBLIC RE AS r - 1. PAD3f3PB I ^ 4 o° __. G RI I >„ ra ar, _ cOENiEa iNE ro Ac vee StnroN I o EASEMENT NOTES N�6o a' ) x g11443%S NP I I E Aq'6 - .�. 8F4(6ME PAD -4500 . I ...� % ENAER ISIR PAGEA1. OF OFFIRL. 628 -55 IN -.12 30 15 ,AI%b E q p Ni I PRO E 4H:6 [ ` '" 1' 2585' ZCE IXNENHAIN MNJI—I WATER DISTRICT � - s��FO ,,. :IMrTS repg _ 4 e 4 -1a xEO4'p� „ia <I - un CA ERE"c"PE E 1 El- AS FILE N6. IB565 -4- gr . Ic / B �4 o49B IiP Go.80' ICE UJSrALL FINE NVOR Nr —. EYISrtNGGH '�' LX $Q j • �' I 10 IM15TALL 2'AIXING. HOC. RFC. J 31-EO AS FILE OR INS84 OF BFFICIAR RECORDS L9NSST%UGTUN, FENCE �_ .. '+. '£ / ENERG SSIPAi PERPD 8 T4,, PRIVATE WAD 6 UTILITY EASEMENT PER LEE SRI R YUZLK) 12 -31 )1 n5 FILE NO. 3W534 OF OFFICIAL FECOR�S. If - as ,k m N 2 A x IN FAVOR ” PAIR CH N. I. IT AL 2 IL W' WIDE N-0, ASEME 7 PER OOC. REC 18 ]1 >4 AS P WIDE RECREA IONAL FRAIL ) %P I4 2]2832 OF OFFICIAL R[CWaG. ER CITY S ND RDS ,; - < INSTALL* Np'PA LNG SIGN' ' ` -- INSTALL 4" AC r IN5T LL TYPE 'E" AC OVER 6" BASE MIN NSTALL TYPE E" Al ALL PCO BRAIN PER 0-75 I H 2'- k J - `PROPOSED S SI EMF EASEMEM PER LOU SEC 11-15-77 AS F/P FRKE EEG 5 O"KE PE GUS' PMEAING RIO-Rd5hRG OZSSTP Te .A (` + OPEN SPACE EASEMENT j I „ 7 -472334 CF OFFICIAL RECIXpS. (MOB. USE ROLLED RAND, SEC SE ROL LED Ex SE xi \ : Idf) ' 9 �' SO' IDE 0 M W O EASEMENT PER OOC REL. ]2 -S -B8 LONC LURE PEp G 4 CONC CURB PER G 4 p- P` S'" *kER f71V PARC)iL, Me1Ff STA i3+zs3z 14183361 'M°�i +' , s�' - * L ' coNSTRA$ r0 cE .''. ,' �r s FIR BG 610378 a w SCAL REL6WS. SIA 7 52.46 1111e.s21 SECTION D-D: ' .wrE' - . _ - ,. `k i k -... LAREIFF r TREN 0 TRICT EASEMENT PEN EVO FORTUNA RANCH ROAD s e PROPOSED OPEN SsucTl®NS ` , Finn�IES aEL �tHu �GO� ni e_sEMEN �o %ss�Pzr aFFmuL rcoWS. NOT rG suLE �y car 'sy Y A n PER, FINAL PARCEL MAP + msTALL 2 eACxI A- r�AA��, '� Ewsr's•se%e� � rlp:rsA xV °tz - - �` + AN sEC ,� ( iortH4croa (are PAD + 47 m F^ EERGY OI55IP PER O -� LLL J F 4 d 0 4J " `Tfi'RI6RT IXMTMCTpi ro YE I EXACT MgIIIX4TAL 8 KATICLL 16- FY-" C5 -7 - OO 2 TNSiA'LL NO PARW SIG^ ` - LOGATIpI 6 E%ISTINS 24' MTEALp£ FAIIXV TO PROPOSED 11 _/' JkTimm CF N1661FLL -TIW ANY CIXELICIS TO BE ILL SLOPE p[�-- BIipX,4r ro I1E I SATE ATIEMICN LF' TW 2% C, ` IfEEf1 OF Mb2' AC OIXE E G 5 ANN, N 3B LL SLOPE T 3925 4�U DE �- 4 ! 4308 a g IN3LL f0 PCLN 49 L 43372 _ 6 CCNCSIGLIRB INST 6' wI AD 450 — 40rA / /.T / K 6 OG WALI(WAY iV, eY9 TO A8 / PER SD;R. G-12 3' TRANS. FR LABLINE STD. CONC. P s' c6 E cuae ro Ra ED DFEE SECTION F -F ROLLER] cope :>x _ _ - AD s RDN I - NOT r6 SCALE T 4 •'Tw 14ve az EGRruw RANr.R RBao FL 434> 35% x R I' �,e PARCEL 4 19e Maw ' ,/ INSrAU M 11 WELL Aawa+ENr 24 - AT r 419E PA�420.0 agTd I ➢JSTALL M18(k2f,1* WMANDU (111) CONC APRON `- -LIP STO CONC' ROLLED I PAQ-W89d \ E� k HP CURB/ COME APRON f98 .T 4w3 r 191 z {e SEE SHEET 3 FOR 1 K 3o'P�OO arcvnwarT no 3E B+crxlr4e TGR rF.murr 4esls Ft 9 WRY ROAD LETAILS DETAIL: DRAINAGE OUTLET PCL3 Ert BsaD &l li 17.R ,r1 v sleu m a NOT r0 scnLE (- --' - - r n 7 4e4-4 rr 3% / /T msrarrmu°NeLwmG rns �ixFS .%a.e°ERx w r �dtD i_ g ry rra ARM,l INa �FAESr :rWr M,. �, — - v i EX25PIN6 GROUND �tm, - FOR'TtINA-^ —ESP '�- ` _ • s•y� 2 .,-. -� , vARres o�' f �ROADr, - I DRArrvA. cna� 1AT . a.Nwu - - I t NGH o1O' RA PRLDBED LADE a �1 ` �.".1- ��^"`x - c E cu R ING Not f,] 5 5 3 PAO 487 N �A Ex1sr Mnre+.uE- A. AAVONN' J- -- - -I / ]rG eALAYEEEG�' THICK BRI TER FIT FEET FABRIC AROPDSE6 LACE exasIF 5 , art mAO s i 'OrLM19 -.. _ n k r �' PRLOSE6 PAD MT Nr w- I a X47 n �: SECTION K -K. SECTION L� Asa ,M, S ION 1 -1: .� !s ' a NDT TO scALE NGr IN sCALE r � x W 1 TRAIL �r� s w� 8 11 I � T o I AG>�Nr�R Y �y vAPtu5 ttE➢5 LY 1-p- HELREABTIONAL TR4IL EASEMENT 1 N Q N mom RAIL RE D WIOT' Y THICK BRUSFiEO CONCRETE - ppOFE5SZ0,y4 TR " THE O- AL I OVER BRAIN PIPE I 4r4R0 ��• A QqS Z � ,.-.._ NO 29577 z AS BU / E"T 3 C 'RAI IN m OlR PARKWAY- s Exp. o3 /3vD3 A SEE SHEETSS &6FOR FORTUNA RANCHROAD IMPROVEMENTS i DATE sz_..L saNOARD ROLLED CURB (cm -� .'U. sLALE o' K N R A, " -'7 DETAIL: CURB OUTLET PER D -27 WA NE OASCO EXP. 3/; lob ''� OF CAL1f NOi TO SGLE o s6 Lo6 1so �,°o� SCALE PPROVF ATE REFERENCES DATE BENCHMARK Y Y CHEME° W. �'� WAP APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN DRAWING NO.° DEL. REF TO OW6 -bo 315(0 ! 11111-11D 11 BENCHMARK 'OL OOE3' PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APP ED FADING PLAN FOR:�� AND Lw yT PoR ftL II 3 I EL. 6OVARE IN TOP . _.. rt. LOCATION'. SW °DRIVER ELLCAMINO DEL non A-1 , . so' DATE. 1(4/- BV 1/t. M.� BY: TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN 6277 -6 ' UDPE 6 RANCHO SANTA FE vERricnL n�Ja WAYNE PABCD— R.C.E. NO. 2� DAIE: 111/LO[_ p'IE: 'J_ -G. a_nE ELEV 119.476 DATUM: USC6G5 E %P. 3 31 03 WORK PROJECT NO, SHEET 2 OF B — IGR Q=" 'ONE X A Po rell CA J9604. I£C' 1-11—RA, oa'` ppgC8L2 ."m.�E 4 PARCEL] �T1LN, �. -msvE x. oW m",,,A, '� I . - e/� 60 �I, m tN6i 'NS P fiMIN3" 6IA4 -+-- 2 IC -fUg — Et14ml a warDn.mE Ste �, R 1B0 4 4.4 ISE CWD ExrE DW AS 1+1401 INTERiCilIXJ AQ4M5 ip 159 1 Poml P ftTUiEw_R£ DOVE i�` 9 210% 2AB 436+00 3% MSIIIIV POAO tMUPJVFA£NTS 2NhAllE DATA NAp .•?� �- _ 6 T > O I LRL1 & 7'51 C 2l TA . AAOM LENSTH lEIUIM6 L11 66]'6404 E �� —fig ➢3' OENiF Ifk °]]2BW 63'19]3 300.00' 33f 54' CENTEPLINE� IM'iALL PFlUS£O CCYdi£rE RAIro W 213J9' CENTEP!AE A� „ _ W OR aaourcE rrun acGESSVExcz7 a 1 EEL +a 5 A. �� _ �� l mt 1,-IO' eausrE-n r ,a 9zf, " I� W - ArEA LE EMISiAG PECIEa iILNdL e' TRAIL PEAR 833% CONCRETE Al O4� 4� ��y j Hdll 0 BE PELLN5TMKrEO a d C8i _ wax caasslvG I JAI "� `� ]I5 anw,A:.ts -flo,zr _ POLL 5 EE 6" NAPE PARCELa v O R 1E G GETTER N DETAIL: PEDESTRIAN RAMP ' �s 3G Nor E PEDESTRIAN A �?'gq.0 a' tAUti S a a N/ n + 0 P �� q'hSj�.,. _ c7 �6 t'P A5- BUILT i CURB DATA wR BUL9 1 F �Sjt Vie. � 4' A + +`� "c 0 F SEE SHEET 2 FOR o� PLAN: ADAM'S RUN -NE 75- 545 ?' W—W LeNGT a ° scaLE 1- -40' SITE GRADING PLAN ay c � (PRrvATe) PPOFESStE,yq 3 1C• 55'45 2I 10, DO' Z7.25' SEE SHEETS FOR yQ4�P�E A. p4s Fy "'A 3 j C2 85'20 23" 70.00' 14.89' J� RECREATION AL TRAIL PLAN m o�° °� g, C3 fls'g0'15' 30.00' 6Z, 14' 'a - z 49 wl�.F AS-BUlL7 xP.""n",/. pa c7 8520'23 10.00• 4.89' q�� No aaa gp oN` � 14 6 So Oa 30.00' 2E �5� 19 13 30 00 ?3 89 W �c�o ecr .uo zssz_ - a�cAlt9 WA NE PAS CO a %v 3 /ar /o3_ _ sr BENCHMARK SCALE SPECIAL DISTRICT APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN DRAWING NO o "s E ogre REFERENCES EPF KAP E s OESCRSPTIEN: CO BENCHMARK 'OC 0073" PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECDMMENOEO/ APP VED�Q GRADING PLAN FOR O TS I .._._. _ IFI HEALWA�DUARE IN TOP 11:1zINII r ao DATE: Bv: ^n ..ns4 =_ Bv. ` .xf... - 7 ADAMS � �62 77 — G DDarrDN SW CORNER EL DAMIND DEL TPM 98 2 2 ADA v UN NDR rE 6 RANCHE SANTA EE a- ....- � ——. R.C.E. ND. z9sn DATE: 1/L/�/ DATE: %2_�L:Q(RoAO ANELEV 119,476 DATUM'. DSC6GE WOPK PFlOJELT ND. ET 3 OF E e 480 s.. 460 - 150 00 VC AA ' 470 - _.. >� oo z" 8 - 47(3. _ I r. � , OF to R0A9E.@ GENFEPLINE. _ q.49 ' � •._ (- r �. 46,0- C 1 _4Vo _ 450 450 K N 440 I 440 12, 3,60 FAISTING GROUND @ CENTERLINE w 430 m 430 . .. - of x COMA i IGOerRACrvP IG EAr r ExaOr HEArzouraL PROFILE. STOEET "A" , 4LOV �I V ANT VEAIICAL 40CAt10N OF EXITING 24" SCALE HOPI 1 450 A'AfEA LINE P SOP TO BCGIIE'1ING CAN$IAUCIIA�N - -. ". r ¢C0o C 1 +00 N2, +00 3+00 4 +00 5 +00_ 6 +00 7 +00 8 +00 Za0- GRAD IL SCALE I -OA 0 4A Bo — IGR Q=" 'ONE X A Po rell CA J9604. I£C' 1-11—RA, oa'` ppgC8L2 ."m.�E 4 PARCEL] �T1LN, �. -msvE x. oW m",,,A, '� I . - e/� 60 �I, m tN6i 'NS P fiMIN3" 6IA4 -+-- 2 IC -fUg — Et14ml a warDn.mE Ste �, R 1B0 4 4.4 ISE CWD ExrE DW AS 1+1401 INTERiCilIXJ AQ4M5 ip 159 1 Poml P ftTUiEw_R£ DOVE i�` 9 210% 2AB 436+00 3% MSIIIIV POAO tMUPJVFA£NTS 2NhAllE DATA NAp .•?� �- _ 6 T > O I LRL1 & 7'51 C 2l TA . AAOM LENSTH lEIUIM6 L11 66]'6404 E �� —fig ➢3' OENiF Ifk °]]2BW 63'19]3 300.00' 33f 54' CENTEPLINE� IM'iALL PFlUS£O CCYdi£rE RAIro W 213J9' CENTEP!AE A� „ _ W OR aaourcE rrun acGESSVExcz7 a 1 EEL +a 5 A. �� _ �� l mt 1,-IO' eausrE-n r ,a 9zf, " I� W - ArEA LE EMISiAG PECIEa iILNdL e' TRAIL PEAR 833% CONCRETE Al O4� 4� ��y j Hdll 0 BE PELLN5TMKrEO a d C8i _ wax caasslvG I JAI "� `� ]I5 anw,A:.ts -flo,zr _ POLL 5 EE 6" NAPE PARCELa v O R 1E G GETTER N DETAIL: PEDESTRIAN RAMP ' �s 3G Nor E PEDESTRIAN A �?'gq.0 a' tAUti S a a N/ n + 0 P �� q'hSj�.,. _ c7 �6 t'P A5- BUILT i CURB DATA wR BUL9 1 F �Sjt Vie. � 4' A + +`� "c 0 F SEE SHEET 2 FOR o� PLAN: ADAM'S RUN -NE 75- 545 ?' W—W LeNGT a ° scaLE 1- -40' SITE GRADING PLAN ay c � (PRrvATe) PPOFESStE,yq 3 1C• 55'45 2I 10, DO' Z7.25' SEE SHEETS FOR yQ4�P�E A. p4s Fy "'A 3 j C2 85'20 23" 70.00' 14.89' J� RECREATION AL TRAIL PLAN m o�° °� g, C3 fls'g0'15' 30.00' 6Z, 14' 'a - z 49 wl�.F AS-BUlL7 xP.""n",/. pa c7 8520'23 10.00• 4.89' q�� No aaa gp oN` � 14 6 So Oa 30.00' 2E �5� 19 13 30 00 ?3 89 W �c�o ecr .uo zssz_ - a�cAlt9 WA NE PAS CO a %v 3 /ar /o3_ _ sr BENCHMARK SCALE SPECIAL DISTRICT APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN DRAWING NO o "s E ogre REFERENCES EPF KAP E s OESCRSPTIEN: CO BENCHMARK 'OC 0073" PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECDMMENOEO/ APP VED�Q GRADING PLAN FOR O TS I .._._. _ IFI HEALWA�DUARE IN TOP 11:1zINII r ao DATE: Bv: ^n ..ns4 =_ Bv. ` .xf... - 7 ADAMS � �62 77 — G DDarrDN SW CORNER EL DAMIND DEL TPM 98 2 2 ADA v UN NDR rE 6 RANCHE SANTA EE a- ....- � ——. R.C.E. ND. z9sn DATE: 1/L/�/ DATE: %2_�L:Q(RoAO ANELEV 119,476 DATUM'. DSC6GE WOPK PFlOJELT ND. ET 3 OF E T N GRAPHIC SCALE I " -40' 0 a eC ego +- CURBLINE RIP PAP ENERGY OISSIPATOR / FL 456 90 2 PFA 0 41 No 2 BACKLNG ( ,DEPRESS ROLLE-0 CLOSE TP IP SE x9.5' RATE TD IN I" _ J AIN. L- A5].5] i ' RLEL 3 PAD SCALE 1IN OUTLET INTO PRAPOSEO Qom/ RIP -RAP ENERGY DI6SIPATOR PER SERE) D -40 DETAIL OVDERSIDE DRAIN OAT£ �a�4° PASCO FXP 3/3//03 { a Acv ; : / � PROPERTY LINE -� E I$i}NG R£CP£ATION L T([AIL -� _ \ 6P WIPE PRS dTE ROAR 6 UTILI EASEMON", PFR GAC REL: M 31 64 AS FILE IN 19&94 PF OFFICIAL IEC6�9S CAVE AIDE � ✓PI =4J 3f @ 19 +10 DO dI m - I DIbOVP E ._ ,.._ . , __ . .. _ ._ � ".s . _' . 0 %~ 484 460 _ 3 WTM J'EAN PER iHf PLE DESIGN SHOWN MER£WV �PICfS A VEq ]CAL LIGAWE OF' a� ary P b $ IS ate. w , g tai ( v 470 470 P,1wo IXJL b ALLOW FM IL qT1 iRJLit ON ROM 61NTATME�}�Epri 05 90 S TO A W IMAi€ wIPAL ALIf>.M ; , ENt.SKit'MG GROUND — ti _� OF iFE, EUrUpE RAAOW Y E.Y�fEN4_IQf! j / EXISTING ® -WATERLINE PEP! � WS EXTEMSEON 139 460 - 460 454 &ff.e .r r 440 � 444 r ame a F ,T� � 430 - 430 1 � � ' PROFILE: 'DOVE HOLLOW RDA 420 \ _ l.W V£Ri je j 420. +00 +00 4 +00 5 +00 6 +00 - 7+00 8 +00 9+00 1000 9100; 12 +00 13 +00 14 00 T N GRAPHIC SCALE I " -40' 0 a eC ego +- CURBLINE RIP PAP ENERGY OISSIPATOR / FL 456 90 2 PFA 0 41 No 2 BACKLNG ( ,DEPRESS ROLLE-0 CLOSE TP IP SE x9.5' RATE TD IN I" _ J AIN. L- A5].5] i ' RLEL 3 PAD SCALE 1IN OUTLET INTO PRAPOSEO Qom/ RIP -RAP ENERGY DI6SIPATOR PER SERE) D -40 DETAIL OVDERSIDE DRAIN OAT£ �a�4° PASCO FXP 3/3//03 { a Acv ; : / � —EL'S PF F- NNrI15 6 DWG o LS 121 _ E I$i}NG R£CP£ATION L T([AIL -� _ \ 6P WIPE PRS dTE ROAR 6 UTILI EASEMON", PFR GAC REL: M 31 64 AS FILE IN 19&94 PF OFFICIAL IEC6�9S CAVE AIDE � � 0/L MPLLOW - I DIbOVP E 6 52. 5 HO{ LLO- W ROAD . 9. _ 7 WTM J'EAN PER o OOC N 992-0 1 1922 AS 1 i PROPERTY LIFE ` ` I ; ; : / � REVISIONS " APPRAVF CATS REFERENCFS DATE BENCHMARK SCALE E 7 pW,y fS3Yd /5(OL C'E" PiION'. Co BENCHMARK "CC 00'13 ... - OFI"'OWAOOUAHE ]N TD o' ._ LOCATION 8W CDRNER EL CAMINO DEL . _ NORTE 6 RANCHO BANiA FE 1.111AL SJ(P - _. ROAD ELEV 119.4'16 DATUM: USC6G5 s" crvNN � >7f OF CAN 2 i� In R tr� —rr 1y4 4D GA E RA'RCEL 3 � IIt ffi LENIFIdRE WTA LIRE �AHIAG OIBTAACE 1£WN:6 L9 S88'42 f0 "E S0.4A' LEMERLINE L2 SB8'42'1P "E 180.]1' CENTEW.IAE PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OE RECOMMENDED AP VEO� ( GRADING PLAN FOR: DA E.!' �".''""�' B "',.�.' TPM.98 -272 ADAM'S RUN 6277 —G W -- �— N E NO _295L DATE: b 1 nvNE PnRCD -mil° DATE. ExP.._?_ I= -per WORK PROJECT ND. SHEET 4 OF 8 PE 7861 PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OE RECOMMENDED AP VEO� ( GRADING PLAN FOR: DA E.!' �".''""�' B "',.�.' TPM.98 -272 ADAM'S RUN 6277 —G W -- �— N E NO _295L DATE: b 1 nvNE PnRCD -mil° DATE. ExP.._?_ I= -per WORK PROJECT ND. SHEET 4 OF 8 PE 7861 Soo vERr7caL I PI'40433 @9x5000 w , m: - 1 2W' vEAftCAY{Gt1RtlE g 8 � � -. Pt = 3ed SO A 6 4o 400 400' psi x�si -z6o vErrnLAL cwvE { �l g I'^ e 0 Qvca�P� e` Z . 390 $ _ IE� , 1 - 8 T PI aye 35 @2x15 a0 Gg9V G1 = a -4ea ¢ = r efiz /r < z yg(TNe_IE e" Pvc SENEP w 6 bex PCs 370-_ - gE .�DA ,� _ , . - , _ 376 OR wG� -1z+ � 366 IE 8 -. EWER P 50%� EXISixNG - r , PROFILE: FO RTUNA RANCH ROAD (PRIVATE) � . SCALE HDR ] 0+00 1 +00 2 +00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 - GRAPHIC SCALE ] " =40' ^r o� PI D 4o eo azo 6 °�� 8 lca; CON5TRUc710N CENTERLINE DATA tih 061N g LINE BEARING DELTA_ RADIUS LENGTH REMARKS 2s •3z ze l zaa.00 B9 is camsrRUCrroN c L A�15 ���ti� � �� �,' L1 Nee •s]59 ry ciL KINw w< Yll RIM w g 8 a •,., �� a IN R\J \11, �il F e o1 gg gg 8 r LINE 2 RE-10INS APPRavED onTE REEEPENCES AT 'J I ww PLAN: F01 scALE NDa r -4o' SCALE' ER' 1 " =8' 46 1 LENGTH AC KCMAKFb CURB > HU /Z _ LINE 7 E 5928' - 30" RCP (1500 -D) I 11 De 4 6 L oL 32 05 40 '11"E 59.69' TYPE E' C DIKE 30" RLP (]500-0) �l 20.00' 212900' 180] 238]' 12'N 2.62' ]B" RLP (]500 -01 188.00' W ✓ N f G A I < O 3/3l l03 C5 Lfi 2'5012 2'0]'42' 212400' 188.00' n.I CONC C6G AN5 CONG. C6G TRANS. ARK SCALE SPECIAL DISTRICT 14.26' CONC c6G TRANS. APPI SQUrc "OC -0073" 85949' 85949' PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENOE ARE IN TDP L LAMIND DEL _ �" DATE: I19 eo ev: ^n ^^ — ANCno sANTa PE R.C.E. ND.- 2957..2— DATE: DPTUM: U8C6GS i1cAL _NLA_— Av NE PASDO EXP.�. -ice] _93 ° 1. 1 e L'URBLINE � . 1 cuRe INLET g TE re DETAIL: AC DIKE/CONC. CURB 8' GUTTER TRANSITION NoT TD suLE QhoEESSrDq p E p p ( J� 4SC Fc S N0. 295]] ^�' Exp. 03/31/03 v {.( Ci CIVttp .. EptIF c ; ;, AC DIKE & CONCRETE CURB DATA LINE BEARING DELTA KADIU5 LENGTH REMARK5 11 32 05 40 20.00' 11 21' TYPE E' C DIKE C2 13 5 '35'18 6'2]00' 20.00' 212900' 180] 238]' TYPE E' Al DIKE TYPE E AC DIKE OR 3'3310' 188.00' 66' TYPE E" AC E.E C5 Lfi 2'5012 2'0]'42' 212400' 188.00' 1050' 6.99' CONC C6G AN5 CONG. C6G TRANS. c8 4'2008' 188.00' 14.26' CONC c6G TRANS. L1 L2 N86'5759 "W GG -759 "E 85949' 85949' TYPE IF Al DIKE TYPE "E" Ac DIKE TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN 6277_6 RE 7RGF waarc PRO.IECT No. SHEET 5 OF 8 I L 450 I � — TP 1 � r . 450 1 F �1 : CONCRETE L TLS pp ff84 -G1� TO TIE EeISTIA9 POAOw v � L � � � \ ,�� - -•� Ali. � �2 O �" 44(h - m - ]50 YEAT ek a*E 100 VEATICAL ONRVEI � 25R WE'PT1CA4 GVPUM - -t l't{ _ PI 422450 @ Idr2500 16,68 92 PI 42)35 p _ _ + l " . W Lwe " tG� C C3 5 V%' j i Y `'� 430" ^J' ; 62 n B.MR+J J; Cif- x� -+ 8 -- -e - 430 i. 0[' L L3 N32'0932E V.6B' LONL COD TPAN9 g'm — `fr! J S I A L5 N32 "09 32 "E 26 62 TYPE "E' C OL(E y�/ j r 61E 5 AD non. 6 Le �t.,, . - 420' _, - Ig exIS11NItIee cW.'sEwEa� . :. r�ewEp-@- DS%v6a Lxt es�>2r', EXISTING IE 9 PVC - - - . � s �� � K n G LEN6VH REMARKS �N LINE BEARM rti P,+ /Pe m, 04 4R. �.P3/ < -g { . , <... , A K ++: T " " +.; L Lz NEC z S 9 / F ISR 568 PER p41G CS' N a al F `�m � K Es NEC 2e G ^� � _: F �:r I _ j W ti Q � i ICA P G? i �Pta+T "f F R n!� 56rk...J n 6 E'h S 66 z ".6"S7, ` ry 1 , t \ f ppOFE55I0N J g 400 GRADING K X nJ {T 90 ft P !E t fKECrt G ✓ _ -III _ - ,.. ._ l� ._ ._. .._ . t - 400..1. a. ( ( fYf P, -y e .3 B r 9 z PROFILE: FORTUNA RANCH ROAD (PRIVATE) i DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORHS L � �1 C ✓' w)P ! E iwi E T @qT f RFF4 /T l Exp. 03/31/03 390 ... . SCALE IbP 1 " =qp - -! SCALE vER.j...B C A (r T t �� F 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15 +00 16+00 , _ 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 BY.I. DATE' 1011 m 0 / A m p Nhf ) f a SCALE: VER 1 4 a ��o DNS A APPROVED e e G GICES D DATE B BENCHMARK S SCALE S `MATCH Ex GR DE Sy cE : "Du y�EEgoN - LIN CONSTRUCTION LENTERLINEDAT11 E BEARING DELTA RAD/U5 LENGTH REMARKS L1 N68'5)59 "W 19852' CONSTROLTION C/L APPROVALS c 0 DRAWING N0. � E 5 �SPpP� ! �F"- MAq xP ROadwaYN �'— 58'S229 200 AO' 205.51' CON6TRUCTION C/L �z s3z •G9 sz'w GaNSraucTlaN c/L o D I � 2ECU 166.28' CONSTRUCTIBN C/L %fin � �1 : CONCRETE L � % L � � � \ ,�� - -•� Ali. � �2 O (� 5 - m 5 L C2 54LT 1 (e' - Lwe " tG� C C3 5 V%' j d4� P Y C4 2 42 11" 212.00 ]0A0' CONC. C9G TRANS ^J' ; ;°'t V E C C5 0 4236 I.So 233' LONC L69 TRANS 0[' L L3 N32'0932E V.6B' LONL COD TPAN9 e� y `fr! J S I A L5 N32 "09 32 "E 26 62 TYPE "E' C OL(E y�/ j S•� I 61E 5 AD non. 6 Le �t.,, . o b . � L � � s �� � K n G LEN6VH REMARKS �N LINE BEARM rti P,+ /Pe m, 04 4R. �.P3/ < -g { . , <... , A K ++: T " " +.; L Lz NEC z S e '♦`,, a 2 h h _ F `�m � K Es NEC 2e G ^� � _: F �:r I � W ti Q � s% , ICA P G? i �Pta+T "f F R n!� 56rk...J n 6 E'h S 66 ".6"S7, ` °�� p , \ f ppOFE55I0N J g g++ P GRADING K X nJ {T 90 ft P !E t fKECrt G ✓ Q g g \ a. ( ( fYf P, -y e .3 B r 9 z g5 A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORHS L � �1 C ✓' w)P ! E iwi E T @qT f RFF4 /T l Exp. 03/31/03 GRAPHIC SCALE f 40' g (PRIVATE) z APPROVEG. HOUNTYSENGINEERLL OA+f 6 C A (r T t �� F FOR WOR( WITHIN COUNTY JURISDICTION wA Ne pa 5 t o 1 /nar Y p� SCALE: HOR' 1' =40' E BY.I. DATE' 1011 m 0 / A m p Nhf ) f a SCALE: VER 1 4 a ��o DNS A APPROVED e e G GICES D DATE B BENCHMARK S SCALE S SPECIAL DISTRICT A APPROVALS c CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT D DRAWING N0. � � � ADS, F o ' _ o D _ C DESCRIP ION: CO BENCHMARK E 100>3" P HoR[EOUAL O PLANS PREPARED C CINDER THE SUPERVISION OF R RECD NpE APP G GRADING PLAN FOR 6277 —G ft QSA F _. a �� T T �'�" k ouaL s/L�o rzrr/a' NaaKEe O Ury TRAIL lG�'M /ErCFr/�/(2) 53 — scar unr /9 F IsrM b f. OH I'VE EVIL SEE' — BELOW n/rTEOmaiL usys (3" K 3 "6PaWNf WNrfE SYNC/ -5% ® aea �nrn AcrrvrEs (g• X3 ^$ZO6JNCWN /TESYMSOLS w a /rE LWAL S/OE/lECPfAJTLNTAL � ® (N.XECA.ftS'61I ✓�AE��/�TUa�cr.A/A�a a /aeiv� a aLL s/sN Xr211 av ® SENS / %✓E!.>:cAES tG5 /.W'WN /1£ E£NNKY ScHCLLBLNdCGa_irEK STYE, p+laR, ✓N.94CKGQOUA! AFF /YCti:CAL5 Rl. 6ESN S/LiS /A/71/E SAA�P 5 /ROB(!. .� 40VR- AHOLLOW ROAD �PEFBMAP N EISAND ONAL TRAIL ,/-� -ice ruwo T,z� TYPICAL SECTION H -H ee: sE'T d 2 SCR-B? L — W TER OAR *' - EYABLI,YIEO 6Y C /7Y I /N57ALLfDAF7 I p5 7NSt PLt. C /fY ASX //"TES A9AJN1' r.(Lt 7 24 3x09 0PP 8 SPi N R h 'j31P \Aypl \ N+35�P 6P pP /Mp GRAPHIC scALE ]' -sa' � ti r- -ir-r- 0 U Fln PR I3 TA 2g 'Iw FORTUNA IL AS -BUILT TRAIL DATA ® m "'® 9 �qC f M1 �- SUBDIVISION BOUNOARv wE I., C4 LNG E55 9 EGRCSS '0 AND II,I AIN HE RAIL F IsrM b f. OH I'VE EVIL SEE' — BELOW TRAIL SURFACE TYPICAL SECTION G -G I¢ w a NUT TO SCALE a a E D E'XI" I N READ 1 �� TRAIL _ CHI ES e EB ESS p A 6ROJNR -- -- -- - -� .� 40VR- AHOLLOW ROAD �PEFBMAP N EISAND ONAL TRAIL ,/-� TYPICAL SECTION H -H ,A,,,— RECREAIIINAL TRau /� � � � °- �- - �'`—"� _ �UBOIVISION BOUNDARY l UPSLOPE l 1 EXISTING 60 RIG CF AY F R ROAD.—' d I CIDENT L PURPOSES / CENTER INTERSECTION 10 WIDE CROSSING PUBLIC UTILITIES PER ROC 1980 REC ] 31 64 BRUSHER CONCRETE tRAIL 11 4.Al ADAMS RUN -_ - -- -15.10 HOLLOW / I �/ E SEMEN PERCFINALOPARCD TRA. .1 12rI -E Rr DOVE ROAD Y >L pp..o 2957) st CIVIL 4� BF CALIF ALAB 93 INSTALL_ �{' WA F p t Ca etP 3/ I /o; I ' . HATER BAI1 d 2 SCR-B? L — W TER OAR *' - EYABLI,YIEO 6Y C /7Y I /N57ALLfDAF7 I p5 7NSt PLt. C /fY ASX //"TES A9AJN1' r.(Lt 7 24 3x09 0PP 8 SPi N R h 'j31P \Aypl \ N+35�P 6P pP /Mp GRAPHIC scALE ]' -sa' � ti r- -ir-r- 0 U Fln PR I3 TA 2g 'Iw FORTUNA IL AS -BUILT TRAIL DATA ® m "'® 9 �qC f M1 �- SUBDIVISION BOUNOARv wE I., C4 LNG E55 9 EGRCSS '0 AND II,I AIN HE RAIL F IsrM b f. OH I'VE EVIL SEE' — BELOW TRAIL SURFACE TYPICAL SECTION G -G I¢ w a NUT TO SCALE a a E D E'XI" I N READ 1 �� TRAIL _ CHI ES e EB ESS p A 6ROJNR -- -- -- - -� R-Rea 0R TrvE son. n. s HFACE TYPICAL SECTION H -H ROAD � — "— SUBDIVISION BOUNOARY� NUT TI SCALE UPSLOPE l ppOFEBBIpN Ail ti 3P ¢ Exp. 03/31/03 v L 30'y/ / —.SEE N01ES -..T' /�h _ 9DTI SIAO UPSLOPE Y >L pp..o 2957) �s _ 0R OF EA5EM�ME�T SCZ oR MBA, 7 EA - INSTALL BRUSHED CONCRETE CRQSS GUTTER PER 6-12 00 A DAMS RUN - ]2_EASEMENi LINE I 1 {� ¢¢ 9 �qC f M1 �- SUBDIVISION BOUNOARv wE I., C4 LNG E55 9 EGRCSS '0 AND II,I AIN HE RAIL F IsrM b f. OH I'VE EVIL SEE' — BELOW TRAIL SURFACE TYPICAL SECTION G -G I¢ w a NUT TO SCALE a a E D E'XI" I N READ 1 �� TRAIL _ CHI ES e EB ESS p A 6ROJNR -- -- -- - -� R-Rea 0R TrvE son. n. s HFACE TYPICAL SECTION H -H ROAD � — "— SUBDIVISION BOUNOARY� NUT TI SCALE UPSLOPE l ppOFEBBIpN Ail ti 3P ¢ Exp. 03/31/03 v A 5 e u l L 7� 30'y/ / —.SEE N01ES -..T' /�h _ 9DTI SIAO UPSLOPE Y >L pp..o 2957) st CIVIL 4� BF CALIF �{' WA F p t Ca etP 3/ I /o; I ]2_EASEMENi LINE I 1 I FKER PADITI NEP T SEMENT 0 S Ef+FEAE Wf ORA3NAGE TREAD A O1H wE I., C4 LNG E55 9 EGRCSS '0 AND II,I AIN HE RAIL F IsrM b f. OH I'VE EVIL SEE' — BELOW TRAIL SURFACE TYPICAL SECTION G -G RECREATION TRAIL NUT TO SCALE 12' (ADAM gNRUN) 12' (FORTUN L'H RI AL) FI+BEMENT -INE EASEMENT LINE TRAIL RKER OSI I ED TO 1' OT IMESHE. WI. OHAI E D E'XI" I N READ 1 �� TRAIL _ CHI ES e EB ESS p A 6ROJNR -- -- -- - -� R-Rea 0R TrvE son. n. s HFACE TYPICAL SECTION H -H RECREATION TRAIL NUT TI SCALE UPSLOPE l l �_ TP/AN POI 5 E DB w Bt' / / % / (/� 5?E 9N0 ScVL CoN%FibAlk` NAY SAC TTb 9a 30'y/ / —.SEE N01ES -..T' /�h _ 9DTI SIAO UPSLOPE WATER BAR DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 3/ S OTE?NUOUS A-F F UN LBB/ Cu. F TRAIL T EAU MIN M N T-. COMPACTED IN.—_ _— III GALVANIZER IL ' 4" OC. x 6 TREATER W000- 2AROW.S. BTAGC£RED WATER BAR CROSS SECTION ACT TO SCALE RECREATION TRAIL NOTES eN 5 r 'EDP I D ER s' 10 B L BE E D O RAIL H E S 0 ITNILEA TI Mq BO BU L PF E 0 ECO OSfo " E PR R D B E c T PE 2. MA I M G SL E I — MAIIILM FILL SLOPE IS . VERTICAL IC GR ❑ 0 TRAIL ALL O E LEER 0%. CROSS SEC F S 0 BE S AN 1% OR GHC E 5- E L L CLEARANCE 12- S BE ED AT ALL POINTS, 6 PHC DE E RS H CI L CI II OAROB IN A 5 DC 0 E E t I SPACING SHALL OR 0 E 'E B P H EVERY 5' RISC. ER: 5 1'E IB 00 B 66 3. 5 TO BE T ALEO MANUFAC RER S BPECIFILATIONS. AVAILABLE FAIR : CAHSONITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 10 BOB GIFFORD BLVD. P 0. BOX " EARLY BRANCH. GL z99]fi -0098 (BOB) 943 -9115 fSOO) )648 -7 I SIGN TEXT TO BE P EPAREO ON PRESSURE SENSITIVE DECALS ^SING JHITE REFLECTS E CFiNTUHY SSH(10I BOOK LETTER i'!E ON IfMVERSALKRE0U5PASHUANO L1904 EIB11'ORY OEL'ALI ORALL AI tlt NL:I'1MHHR "" ^"" - -- to DESCRIPTION: CO BENCHMARK.I 0073' PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVI/'+'S//ION OF RECOMMENNE TPA/ (]8 27�] ADAMS RUN 6277 -G CHISELED sOUARE IN TOP eonIIOwnL a" . 50 I� DATE:x? eV1�J[1,.__ 0V . -� - �V� a7 L /'� /1�Y� OF HEADWALL W e(LQ -Lp LOCATION' sw CORNER EL caul NO DEL ._ R.C.E. ND.?95?— DATE .2 DATE: I.,-Z -01 SHEET 7 OF E NOR1E 6 RANCHO SANTA FE VEgr]LAE �P yyfyNE PASCO EXP.� =3LQ3- ORH PROTEST 0 786 I N GRAPHIC SCALE I " =SO' C IC W IN REVISIONS APPROVED I LATE I REFERENCES 2 BAGS HIGH AT OUTLET 25 'I-- ---------- : - ---- — f A t o o Apo 0 0 0 o u O I of - I e AT OUTLET 2 BAGS HIGH —� a —2 BAGS HIGH AT OUTLET I o° 1 °o Q� 0 p I 1 p xI 000 0000 i 000 00 I 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 I I I, I '. ppOFESS1p 4 QNO �E A. p4s me I NO. 29577 AS QUILT � Exp. 03/31 /D3 n // wrt6 zl.2 fie} Ctvl� ,�0 IfM^+ RrE z. 4�OF CALlfU' .A Y.v1 MASCO EFP 3 LEGEND HYOPOEEEO SOPS PROTECTION SANG /GPA ✓EL GAGS c°°°°°°c EROSION CONTROL 1. IN CASE EMERGENCY WORK IS REGUIREO CONTACT CONSTRUCTION 2, EEQUIPMENT AND WORKERS FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BE MADE AIL ABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING THE RAINY SEASON ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS STALL BE STOCKPILED ON SITE A DNVENIENT LOCATIODE 0 FACILITATE RAPID CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY DEVICES EN RAIN IS IMMINENT. 3, DEVICES 'HE ON PLANS SHALL NOT BE MOVED OR MITI FIE ITHOUT E PPROVAL OF THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR. A. E CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO ORKING ORDER TO E BATIBRACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AFTER EACH RUN OFF PRODUCING INFALL, E. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL EASURES S MAY BE EOU I... BY THE CUM CITY ENGINEER .DUE O UNCOMPLETED RAGING OPERATION OR NFORESEEN CIRSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE, G. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONS—EE AND SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT USLIC TRESPASS ONTO AREAS EN IMPOUNDED WATERS CREATE HAIARBOUS CONDITION. 7, ALL EROSION CONTROL EASURES P...ISO' PER THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN SHALL BE INCORPORATED HEREON B. GRADED READ AROUND 'HE PROJECT PERIMETER MUST DRAIN AWAY L.. THE CE OF SLOPE Ai THE CON.IBI.S OF EACH WORK D.' ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHOWN SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN HE IVE (D) DAY RAIN A" OTHER DEBRT SCSHALLKBEEREMOVVEDYAFTEREEACNA RAINFALLLT 10. SHOULD GERMINATION OF DRDSEEGED SLOPES FAIL TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE COVERAGE OF GRADED SLOPES (90% COVERAGE) PRIOR 0 NOVEMBER SB. HE SLOPES SHALL SE STABILIZED WITH PUNCHED STRAW INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE ITH SECTION 33 023 OF THE EROSION D SEDIMENT CONTROL O...N OF HE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONEEPVATION. PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION DF RECOMMENDED AP P V E / ,'EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR a �_ BY �.. R G EDANE :)/?/ BY, _. TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN 6277 -G WAYNE PASCO DATE: 214 /n DATE: ]�Q�_ EXP.�aLQg WORK PROJECT N0, SHEET 8 OF E I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM THE OWNER OF OR AM INTERESTED IN THE LAND SUBDIVIDED BY THIS PARCEL MAP AND I CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF THIS MAP. I HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC THE PORTION OF FORTUNA RANCH ROAD FOR THE USE AS STREETS AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. I HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS THE EASEMENT FOR RECREATIONAL TRAIL PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. I HEREBY GRANT TO THE OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT. A PUBLIC AGENCY. OR ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, AN EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPELINES, OTHER DISTRICT FACILITIES. AND FOR ALL ACCESS PURPOSES OVER, UNDER, AND ACROSS ALL PRIVATE STREETS AND EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP, SUBJECT TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THE CERTIFICATE GRANTING EASEMENTS WITHIN PRIVATE STREETS TO THE DLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ON COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TRACT NO. 4413, MAP11372, RECORDED NOVEMBER 21, 1965 WHICH TERMS AND CONDITIONS ARE HE'R'EBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE I HEREBY GRANT I() THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, PRIVATE BIOLOGICAL OPEN SPACE EASEMENT OV174 UPON CROSS AND UNDER THOSE PORTIONS S IR'&3 HEFTtf ��F A OF PARCEL TER REFERRED TO AS THE SUBJECT LAND, TO WIT, W A PERPETUAL EASEMENT FOR BIOLOGICAL OPEN SPACE OVER, UPON, ACROSS AND UNDI 17 THE SUBJECT LAND ANG NO BUILDING STRUCTURE OR OTHER THINGS WHATSOEVER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, ERECTED, PLACED OR MAINTAINED ON THE SUBJECT LAND EXCEPT AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY A MAJOR USE PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 98-272 BEING A PARCEL MAP OF: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN , IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS , COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY PARCEL MAP GUARANTEE PROVIDED BY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ORDER NUMBER 203066778 U-50 DATED 21—.,oi ADAM'S RUN L.P. A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ACCEPTANCE CER71FICATE GENERAL PARTNER: PSF B N, NO A CORPORATION BY: SIL WOOD P'R"E' 01D REP BEN, INC. GERERAL BANK AS BENEFICIARY UNDER DEED OF TRUST RED JAN.16, 2001 AS F/P2001-0023025 A✓0 4S PVP 200t- 0o;!30Za , 8,rR a,' 0-1 —,TPt BY SENIOR VICE TOP CE PRESIDENT VICE PR RIENT THE SIGNATURES OF THE PARTIES LISTED BELOW, OWNERS OF EASEMENTS PER DOCUMENTS NOTED BELOW, HAVE BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436 SUBSECTION (a) (3) (A) (I) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURES ARE NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY. 70NING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, AND ALL NECESSARY PUBLIC UTILITY LINES, EASEMENTS TO SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC PER DOCUMENTS RECORDED DECEMBER 28. 1955 IN BK 5919 PAGE 565 OF OFFICIAL 0 THE PERPETUAL RIGHT, BUT NOT THE OBLIGATION, TO ENTER THE RECORDS AND RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1977 AS F/P 77-472334 ,SUBJECT LAND AND REMOVE ANY BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES OR OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OTHER THINGS WHATSOEVER CONSTRUCTED, ERECTED, PLACED OR MAINTAINED ON THE SUBJECT LAND CONTRARY TO ANY TERM TO OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT COVENANT OR CONDITION OF THIS EASEMENT AND TO DO ANY kORK PER DOCUMENTS RECORSDEPDECA f AS F/P -- 7460 -p DE jAg 0 0 O�� OF OFFICIAL RECORDS JANUARY 31, 1962 AS NECESSARY TO ELIMINATE THE OF ANY EXCAVATION OR Y EFFECTS FILE NO. 18555 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS & RECORDED OCTOBER PAD PLACEMENT OF SAND. SOIL. POCK OR GRAVEL OF? ANY GRADING OR JIL 1974 AS FILE NO, 74-272832 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND OTHER MATERIAL DONE OR PLACED ON THE SUBJECT LAND RECORDED DECEMBER B, 1988 AS FILE NO. 88-630378 OF CONTRARY TO ANY TERM, COVENANT OR CONDITION OF THIS EASEMENT, GRANTOR COVENANTS AND AGREES FOR ITSELF AND ITS OFFICIAL RECORDS. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS AS FOLLOWS: AN EASEMENT TO CARDIFF fANITATION DISTRICT PER DOC. (A) THAT It SHALL NOT ERECT CONSTRUCT, PLACE OR RED. NOVEMBER 10 1994 Af,, FILE NO.1994-0655276 OF OFFICIAL , MAINTAIN 01 PERMIT THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, RECORDS. PLACEMENT �)I± MAINTENANCE OF ANY BUILDING OR THE SIGNATURE OF VAqTOUV OWNERS OF RECORD, OWNER OF STRUCTURE UR OTHER H_ (ING WHATSOEVER ON THE AN EASEMENT AS DISCLOSED By DEED RECORDED JUNE 11, 1959 SUBJECT LAND 07HER THAN SUCH BUILDINGS, IN BOOK 7710, PAGE 351: JANUARY 31, 1964 AS FILE NO, STRUCTURES �)R OTHER THINGS AS MAY BE PERMITTED 19804 AND DECEMBER 31, 1971 AS FILE NO. 306534, ALL OF BY A MAJOR )BE PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO. ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS AND ALL NECESSARY PUBLIC UTILITY LINES, PRIVATE ROAD & UTILITY EASEMENT PER.DCC. N0.2001- 0018034 (R) THAT 17 SHALL, NOT USE THE SUBJECT LAND FOR AN' DEC -2L—,'--2aC—A & AS Na2001-0018035 PURPOSE EXCEPT AS BIOLOGICAL OPEN SPACE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AU7110RYZATION OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS On ITS PROPOSED PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS ARE COVERED BY A SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, COVENANT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS PER (C) THAT IS SHALL NOT EXCAVATE OR GRADE OR PERMIT ANY DOC. — PEC: EXCAVATING OR GRADING TO BE DONE, OR PLACE OR ALLOW TO BE PLACED ANY SAND, SOIL, ROCK, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIAL WHATSOEVER ON THE SUBJECT LAND WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS OR ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS' PROVIDED HOWEVER, THAT COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY FOR FUTURE PARK, GRANTOR MAY EXCAVATE, GRADE OR PLACE SAND, SOIL, TRAFFIC AND FLOOD CONTROL FEES ARE COVERED BY A ROCK OR GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIAL ON THE SUBJECT LAND COVENANT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS BY AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY A MAJOR USE PERMIT ISSUED DOCUMENT NO. RECORDED PUSUANT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ENCINITAS . AND ALL NECESSARY PUBLIC UTILITY LINES. (D) THAT THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS SET PRIVATE ROADS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE FORTH HEREIN MAY BE SPECIFICALLY ENFORCED OR WITH THE PRIVATE ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT ENJOINED BY PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RECORDED AS FILE /PAGE THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THE GRANT OF THIS EASEMENT AND ITS ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY DRAINAGE ACROSS ADJACENT PROPERTIES IS COVERED BY A HOLD HARMLESS COVENANT RECORDED OF ENCINITAS SHALL NOT AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC OR ANY MEMBERS THEREOF TO USE OR ENTER UPON ALL OR ANY PORTION OF THE AS DOC. NO. SUBJECT LAND, IT BEING UNDERSTOOD THAT THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE COVERED BY A EASEMENT IS SOLELY TO RESTRICT THE USES TO WHICH THE COVENANT GRANTED TO CITY OF ENCINITAS PER DOCREC. SUBJECT LAND MAY BE PUT, AS FIR — COVENANT REGARDING PEAL PROPERTY TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP IS COVERED BY A COVENANT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS PER DOC. REC. AS F/P THE OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT HEREBY ACCEPTS THE GRANT OF EASEMENTS DESCRIBED HEREIN INCLUDING ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THE CERTIFICATE GRANTING EASEMENTS WITHIN PRIVATE STREETS GRANTED TO THE OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ON COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TRACT MAP NO. 4413. MAP NO. 11372, RECORDED NOVEMBER 21, 1985. THE OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT CONSENTS TO THE RECORDATION OF THIS MAP AND HAS AUTHORIZED ITS GENERAL MANAGER TO SIGN THIS CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 87-01 ADOPTED JANUARY 15,,, 19�7," DATE. Q By. -�'tft OZID c OLL6M GENERAL 1, KERRY L. MILLER, CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE NO LIENS FOR UNPAID CITY TAXES OR UNPAID BOND ISSUES UNDER ANY IMPROVEMENT ACTS OR IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHOWING ON THE BOOKS OF THIS OFFICE, EXCEPT TAXES NOT YET PAYABLE AGAINST THE TRACT OR SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF, SHOWN ON THE ANNEXED MAP AND DESCRIBED IN THE CAPTION THEREOF, IN WITNESS HEREOF, I HAVE SET MY HAND THIS DAY OF . 2000. BY: KERRY L. MILLER, CITY TREASURER 1. SANDRA HOLDER, DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF SAID CITY HAS REVIEWED THIS MAP PURSUANT TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS MUNICIPAL CODE AND HAS FO ONO IT TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.96-272 AND HAS ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC SUBJECT TO IMPROVEMENT, THE EASEMENT FOR RECREATIONAL TRAIL PURPOSES AS GRANTED ON THIS MAP, AND HAS REJECTED ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC THE PORTION OF FORTUNA RANCH ROAD AS DEDICATED ON SAID MAP AND HAS REJECTED THE BIOLOGICAL OPENSPACE EASEMENT OVER, ACROSS & UNDER THE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1,2 6; 3 AS GRANTED ON SAID MAP. SANDRA HOLDER DATE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT NOTE,' SECTION 66477.2 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PROVIDES THAT A REJECTED OFFER SHALL REMAIN OPEN AND SUBJECT TO FUTURE ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF ENCINITAS. THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER 14Y DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REDDEST OF CARDIFF PROPERTIES IN IN OCTOBER OF 1999, AND I STATE THAT SAID SURVEY IS TRUE & COMPLETE AS SHOWN; THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER INDICATED AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS SHOWN THEREON. I WILL SET ALL OTHER MONUMENTS OF THE CHARACTER AND AT POSITIONS INDICATED BY THE LEGEND IN THIS MAP WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS A NO ALL SUCH MONUMENTS ARE OR WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, IF ANY A. ASS 0) C' No. 29577 BY: Exp. 03/31/03 WAYNEIPASCO, RCE 29577 CTvI\1 M Y MARC RH EGISTRATION EXPIRES A' OF CA 3J, 2003, OF CA CITY ENGINEER CERMICATE I ALAN D. ARCHIBALD, CITY ENGINEER FOR THE CITY OF &CINITAS, STATE THAT THIS MAP DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A MAP OF A MAJOR SUBDIVISION FOR WHICH A FINAL, TO SECTION 66426 OF THE MAP IS REQUIRED PURSUANT 0, SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. I FURTHER STATE THAT THIS PARCEL EL MAP CONFORMS TO THE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND%,, APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF AND THAT ALL PRov P 15T DNS OF TITLE _ 4 OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS CODFj,JAV.'-G,EEN COMPLIED N ITH. THIS MAP CONFORMS PVIFi THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND f '(:/,' �',11-,'1NANrF I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND AM 6" 151� Z Lb HAY' If 15 TECHNICALLY CORRECT, 1- At-AN D. ARCHIBALD, CITY ENGINEER ALAN D. —ARCHIBALD —DATE CE2 RCE 21869 EXP. 9-30-01 1, THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, HERESY CERTIFY THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT (DIVISION 2 OF TITLE 7 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE) REGARDING (A) DEPOSITS FOR TAXES, AND (B) CERTIFICATION OF THE ABSENCE OF LIENS FOR UNPAILkj STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL I ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES EXCEPT THOSE NOT YET PAYABLE, HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH, 4 THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Date: --- BY: RECORDER'S STATEMENT FILE NO. FILED THIS DA Y OF — 2000, AT IN BOOK OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE OF WA YNE PASCO. GREGORY J. SMITH COUNTY RECORDER DEPUTY COUNTY —RECORDER FEE: $7.0ORF $1.00MF PASCO ENGINEERING 259-8212 GRADING PLAN 6277-G N. BEACH. STE. A -272 Is- BEACH. CA 92075 CALIF. COORD. INDEX 326-1701 CITY T. Pu M. 98 PARCEL MAP NO. STATE OF CAL1'rOP 1A ED, COUNTY OF ON- moA-A-L-i L-- BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED. A NOTARY PUBLIC IN SA�,,O, STA4E PERSONALLY 4 J� APPEARED—,,;C�-D� J-A' " PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME)(PROVED TO ME ON 7H BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAMES) (S) ISIARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED 70 ME THAT HE /SHE /THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS /HER /THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES) AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY (IES) UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED. EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT, III TNESS 11F�A , E IF GET MY HAND THIS 0, , OF 1: ki, SIGNATURE. NAME: PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS My COMMISSION EXPIRES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss' COUNTY OF 1Apj_DLGLf�_ ' ON ZjvI_ -- BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A 4�1� IN ANU FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED_� L „_'7 - 15-i' -Szxd WOO Z' �'�AEGGGNA,-L* KNOWN-7:4L-90- (PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE MA ME 68) TS/ARE, SUBSCRIBED To THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT 8E1&-fEHTHE-Y EXECUTED THE SAME IN HUSIHERITHEIR-AUTHORIZED CAPACJTY(TES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR- S I GNATURE(Sd ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(g), OR THE ENTITY (LEl) UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSONS) ACTED, EXECUTED THE .INSTRUMENT. WITNESS WHERE OF I HAVE SET MY HAND THIS -Z677� — DAY OF I-A rwu .c am 20091. SIGNATURE: NAME: * I PRINCIPAL NCIPAL 'OtA(�' USllbsb: My COMMISSION EXPIRES: STATE OF CALIFORNIA BE, COUNTY OF ON NOTARY PUBLIC BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A IN AND FOR SAID STATE, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETS (PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME) (PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE) TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAMES) (S) IS /ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE /SHE /THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS /HER /THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS /HER /THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY (IES) UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE ENCINITAS INSTRUMENT. OLIVENHAIN _.._._____-- -°.., H. T. S WITNESS WHERE OF I HAVE SET MY HAND THIS DAY OF 2000, SIGNATURE: NAME: OF BUSINESS: f THI. MS MPRINCIPAL Y COMMISSION EXPIRES: ✓ Coo WINITY MAP NOrl'05CALE PASCO ENGINEERING (619) 259-8212 GRADING PLAN 5277-G 535 N. HWY IDL STE. A SMANA BEACH. CA 92075 CALIF. COCAP, �DEX 326-1701 ® T. P. M. 98-272 PARCEL MAP NO. - - - - -- - LOT2 MAP15208 PCL2PM17967 SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS SBB °42'10 "E 677.55'(589 °15'01 "E 677.61 MAP 13208)(586 °42'10 "E PM 17967) - -� -\ 24, 90 " f°. SBB °42 10 'E 652.56 (652.62 MAP 13208) O - - - ® INDICATES FOUND 2" IRON PIPE &DISC MARKED RCE 29577 HOLLOW R®� .00' gy 1 c�ttl .�.`N ° A G PER MAP S FOUND `� .__ 194. 40� .m (PRIVATE) A H G H �� ® INDICATES FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE 6 CAP MARKED RCE 22203 PER N01 °17 50 "E 0 \ PARCEL MA 6594 ° \I F T T 888 °42'10 "E 430.33' 172.84' ° INDICATES FOUND POINTS AS NOTED .__ N64 31 53 W 4, _ 55 "E EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD I � DEL, °� _ 1 i � INDICATES SET M -10 STREET MONUMENT EASEMENT KNOWN AS DOVE I GROSS 2. 36AC N2q °31'43 °E 1R) rn� 1- °m HOLLOW ROAD PEP OOC. 1998 - 0488157 ` N21 °56'03 "W �)" O INDICATES SET 3 /A "X 18" IRON PIPE & CAP MARKED RCE 295777 REC. AUGUST 4TH, 1998 O.R. NET 2. OOAC ( ) INDICATES RECORD DATA AS NOTED I N - I 1 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER PM 6594 �. ;� INDICATES PARCEL MAP BOUNDARY of �� ml x ' i 27.00' WIDE PROPOSED PRIVATE ROAD ml m „ &UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE GRANTED i° CONCURENTLY WITH TRANSFER OF TITLE BASIS ®� BEARINGS - -\ TO PARCELS 1, 2, 3& 4 1 o m ., 111 RINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE N.A.D. 83 . ZONE 6, D 9p THE BASIS OF BEARINGS 0 GRID BEARING BETWEEN SAN DIEGO COUNTY CONTROL MONUMENTS m "SD -50- 010 -XP02" 6 SD- 933W006 ". AS SAID STATIONS ARE LISTED IN 1O E SA GO COU ° N88 °42 '10 "W 244.50 - d u7� Q- E OUOT FERENCE MA PEE.: S DEEDS THE N DIE NTY HORIZONTAL CON R L � ° N 39 °53'39" ED BEARINGS FROM RE P / MAY NOT BE IN TERMS OF SAID SYSTEM. OE 5.00 WIDE PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT a SOLAR NOTE: n N84 °39' 51 "W (R -1I m I ) ALL .PARCELS WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION HAVE A MIN IHUN OF ONE HUNDRED (100) SQUARE FEET OF SOLAR ACCESS FOR EACH FUTURE DWELLING UNIT CEL2 PARCEL.3 ALLOWED BY THIS SUBDIVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 24.27.090 GROSS 2.5OAC m OF THE CIT Y MUNICIPAL CODE `R) NET 2.44AC I GROSS 2. 59AC zp•W �- �� NET 2.22AC m NOTE; N1pr. -12 �„ SEE SHEET 4 FOR PROPOSED OPENSPACE 6 EXYBTING 30' EASEMENTS OT C, ° X308.0 .631 6 308. ?7631 °' N ?p �4i���/� Q \ \� / m o 0 X57 .66 -, -. �.� ✓- E-/V65.8 o m v m A fl� � w - Q�O�oU& ,,,,,,,, � � \ �' ° `U 20... P�G01 �.) 6• QZ p2 E 465 H 1j66 OA EASEMENT TO G M W 0 GflANTEG HEREON b PORTION OF FORTUNA RANCH ROAD OFFERED o 1 \ ✓ N \ (l O O FOR DEDICATION AND REJECTED HEREON ° C� �;/ 30 PROCYI{aED 9R1VAT6 !A.. E4�J+PEMT" 41 © Pis Bs cavaar�s eorlcu«s:.Nm.„r W rrN z P ^ TEZ4A1�F64m OF TITS 7� 1Yt•14 -02y3q- a' O / OD PUBLIC BIOLOGICAL. OPENSPACE EASEMENT Q� GRANTEO TO CITY OF ENCINTAS HEREON SEE SHEET 3 557 °50'28 "W (R) GENERAL. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT CRANED HEREON ° \ _ ` ,2 ARMY RECREATIONAL EASEMENT S87'66 22' E 198. 38 _.._. - O \ \ \ O TO THE CITY CF PUBLIC ENCINITAS UT GRANTED HEREON. F �L �� � \ © PRIVATE A7AO 6 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC_1A 1 -// -200/ AS F/P Poo BP39 c o of ^° / PROPOSED PRIVATE ROAD 6 Ufll °35 vP'p 0 GRANTED HEREON �( PARCE''3 C5 my -�,�, LINE DELTA RADIUS ARC \ \Y m °q 027 °W V 11 63 °18'36 300.00 331.49 N71 6fg OpO, < / .A 286.50 316.57 PARCEL4 p C3 63 313.50 346.41' ' ' P C4 90 °00' 00" 20.00' 31.42' ma v GROSS NET 2 1 A 2. 71AC oh _ _ _ u� I C5 90 °00'00" 20.00' 31.42' �, k,. `, C6 62 °35'48" 18.50' 20.21' . 3C , , � P/ r I aN m NOTE. p°+ a, I C7 70 °56'23" 18.50' 22.91' G' FOR EASEMENTS OA OB © 2 /�9�ryo' F �0. ° � 5' 43 I CB 30 °23' 06" 313.50' 166.26' ¢N N q 3p WIDTH O° EASEMENTS EXPANDS TO 2j Ni' / ✓ o I C9 30 °23' 06" 300.00' 159. 10' �"° ✓w ON SUED. �. - p�� �� A \ �� c (III m i \2 \rON�AON�f SAD tN, D / an m oa ° �)I C13 23-46 '027 300.00' 119 76' � 9 B � 2 / C12 3 46 27 313.50' 159.50' mo t\ 0 7 C15 34 °22 85.50 °z r� S88 °57'59 "E 1313.86' (N69'27 '02'W 1313.98 PM 7084) _._._ / - -- oaa .. -- -- (X87 °55'22 "E 1313.99 PM 3278) j`D'0 , I \ u \`'__ `// C15 21 °10 230.00' 85.03' wgE ,200 p LINE BEARING 200.00 p58 `�2' 656. 99 PM 17084) $ F P 00 L1 557 50 28 .E DISTANCE 120.01' I - .a (656.99 PM 327 8) r - - 451'88 _ O i __ 556.93 - - -. F n A B C (657.00 PM 3278) (657.00 PM 17084) a 5 2 2 Po200 O mss\ . 1 _y q pISC MARKED �'- - - -- -� - m 588 °57 .10 _ - ) 5 P \ FOUND CONE. NON. W/ L2 S35055 59 W 33.13' (R) g 452 69.13 S02 °02 46'W 18.00 ' _ _ _ - - '59 "E 452 41' 58• d , RCE 8250 PER ROS 6142 & PM 17084 L3 564 °00 19 "W 44.48' (R) - GI �Upa �� �H �y L4 565 05 02'W 13.50' (R) - p,' g5 PCL 2' \ / I PROJECT ARE WITHIN THE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT L6 N86 50' 28,'W 19. 13' "hl 9� NOTE: EXISTING PRIVATE ROADS OF ACCESS 70 THE PCL 1 OF THE LAND DIVISION. E 9.13 AK�rm LA r ,�- � KR1 AIE LAM;. ¢�.✓y 28 535 SN. H01, STE. ENGINEERING CALIF. COORD.6INDEX 326 -1701 CITY T T. t m M ® 96-272 (619) 259 -8212 SOLANA BEACH. CA 92075 PARCEL MAP EASEMENT DETAIL SHEET SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS �4 STRIP © EA4MENTINFORMA770N HOLLOW ROAD � 20.00' 1 12' WIDE SDGE EASEMENT PER OFFICIAL REC. 12-28 -55 IN 0 20' O BOOK 5919, PAGE 565 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS o_ _ _ — — — — — _ m — — — — — — — — — — — — - --- N 8 °42'10 "W - - - -- -- CENTERLINE 20.00' WIDE DOC, RED, MUNICIPAL WATER LINE BEAflINf BISTANCE w __ „ L1 562 °03'24 "w f0e.od' I - -- 167.63' - DISTRICT EASEMENT PER OOC. REC. 1 -31 -62 AS FILE L2 N32 °091f'E 7564' gy+ w ' I N0. 18555. OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. _L3 M1'65 °O1 m2` 61.07' mlm I fz O OOC REC�131- 64TASaa ILE &NOT719804 EASEMENT RECORDS l4 S79 °99'16'W 41.51' L5 N76°3629 W 45.80' �'� O PRIVATE ROAD & UTILITY EASEMENT PER. DOC. REC. Ls N35 °39'02 "W 3d.0]' m I 12-31 -71 AS FILE NO. 306534 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 17 se9 °drzrw a.es' PARCEL 1 LB Nf9 °27'd5 "w 72.90' I O F/P O.M.W.D. EASEMENT PER DOC. OFFICIAL RECORDS, REC. 10 -11 -74 AS L9 N29'2f 72 "w 38.62' I C6) 77-472334 OF OFM OFFICIAL ORECORDS 11 -]5 -77 AS F/P lif N88 °4f'd1 "E 37.94' L12 563 °34'17'W 59.86' fo wQ I �Im I O7 30' WIDE -53037 EASEMENT PER REC. REC. 12 -8 -88 � I AS F/P 88- 630378 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. LS N61'07'39'E 233.97' \ Im \ N I O CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT EASEMENT PER OFFICIAL m REC. 11 -10-94 AS F/P 1994 - 655276 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 0, f 20.00' WIDE OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT I EASEMENT PER DOC. REC.MAY 3, 1961 AS FILE NO. 76508 I PARCEL OFFICIAL RECORDS. N86 °24'33 "E 10 BIOLOGIAL OPEN SPACE GRANTED HEREON m 9.39 PROPOSED HEREON SIGHT EASEMENT 12' WIDE PUBLIC RECREATIONAL EASEMENT "f0 THE ��p �7 �'•+ I CITY OF PUBLIC GRANTED HEREON. PAFiCEl2 ( ,2I � I �%4j0 �Qp Qhpv� I 5 L7 7850 1 'HAPPIIC SCALE O C 4 _- ��� 700 750 \0 m \ \Ng9 °4 6AS1C OP BEAMNGS & NAD 85 DETAIL \ rL - - d' ) 00 _N86 °50'18 "W N 4 -3301 '.—. _' N> 1 N87 °02' 33 'W \'�J�, �OQOP~06 34.49. 1a�gg 1g ,W 49.17' OS. .00�'� A.1.. X00 39 oo F � COUNTY LE SAN DIEGO - �� Gyj> ° Po m 12'x` 1� - h��0 PT. AG J33NOOS 314" IP 6 42 q`. 53�� \ N 1,974,203.203 S71 qp 2> H. E 5271.990.104 q� COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO f2 ° % CONTROL PT. 50- 010 -XP02. O , 2�, �,: %`� N 973026.900 CAP P EL S v g E 5.271,006.759 O -- EL 729.91 q= 20 L- 2129 OJ� o ° -0°31 ' 17 ' - 12 2 P O a¢ L SO 17'-12 A- 60'59 29 12 \ \o A) o- A \OEM I 0002' ; PARCELS sr goose � oei / // So , 6�All��� Ot �_ 0 / ',d l6 S88'42'10 "E 2 652.56 (GROUNOI N V ti M+ COR Ni E C CEL c1 O J � z 4 SUBDIVISION 524.64' -- 132.29' -_ J BOUNDARY —" N.T.S. 23393' 1 - -/ THE COMBINED SCALE FACTOR P 010-X P0 IS 1 _ _ -r _ .A _ 40^m / -0. 99993045450(GRID DISTANCE= GROUND DISTANCE X COMBINED SCALE FACTOR) PASCO ENGINEERING GRADING PLAN 6277 -G ® M o _ (699) 259 -8212 5351 11Y aof STE, a CALIF. COORD. INDEX 326-1701 IN 11 IIIASNSPECItONLOF OF BECTNN IF YORK i0 ( 6a) 6 ENODIFERIAN SERVICES WITANIMINT FOR All GRAPHIC 6CALI 9 " -A0' - - _ 93 pCi HE EFIL FOG ,. 'N`11 Y OF mow, n, a� p •• - ••°'o" I O flFPL GH K. R1[j Y ER NOUN T ATHEA9 BOVE dFFECTIVE LACED 111 q, NOUNS, T N ANO /OR MATER 0 E E EUDENCEA ITANIE 1171-1 NCA ASK 15BETERfl10 Ih " "ITT I AccC N ;AMTS uN C RY a T ! } A v N A 85 ,E ci 1 2 J 14 UTILITY _ T _ WASHING ArtO HE ° rM1SauLRLi P AS A` - LATERALS LOCATED D WI HIN Poe v OR LANTRAL TABLE SEE THIS GRES, N — r m G ' v Gr00 �. _ l- FAI PATCH TO M"?AE°sMUYNWEERE- IN°T�il° DERITAIE ACCESS IFAE- ➢ I HARGE AD 1111 ANN PL UMBiNGEPERMtTS' ZCINp / ARE REOUtasD PRIOR TO N N To SYSTEM. N I 19. NEW SEWER MAINS LESS THAN 35 INCHES IN W DIAMETER SHELZ BE INSPECTED Y CLOSED q o IRS ITT TEL 0 TER COMPLETION OF AP j '����� A IRS ITT B L t 0 OF PSHEO GRAOING, N SUi PRIOR i0 PL CEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR PERMANENT iRENC RESURFACING, CONTRACTOR SMALL PROVIDE 0 ELEVITION INSPECTION. (SET:. 306 1. . G �m PLAN. PUBLIC SEWER MAIN - ADAM'S RUN �RCEL 4 f , REFER TO DWG. NO. 6277 -G FOR STREET - ®ETALSBMFROVERRENT DATA AND 2N C CENYER1Tk IMYA SEVER TA LAE GEARING DD,TA RADI119 lkNGYH 14TdAlN(S MID_P l&LTA PATH ](S'R _"151 63'19 ]2 5 °ZB D9 W 293 39' LE iER!IM1E ... -_..__ 60 96 SEWER LATERAL TABLE XPTH ENCINSTAS FIRE PROTECTION OLIVENNAIN MUNICIPAL WATER ✓A PLL �TXONTL H ]E @ LURE ENG ELE N S RB SLOPE CL'R RS ELCV 0 /W R /IN S 454 3J 555 33 2 44 2% 44C 12 4x8.2 ➢65' 4439P - l3 6 C 2% 45489 46006 256' 45513 ,I��iT REVISTBN6 APPRDVeD DATE —REFER IS 7_JLD MARX SCALE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT -- £NC AT .._�'....-_. 111L.1 J.rap� sTa VICIN17Y1MAP LEGALDESCRIPTION SOUTHEAST QUARTER F THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST D RTES OF SECTION OWNSHIP 13 SOUTH RANGE 3 WEST. SAN BERNARD INO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. A.P.N.: 284 459 05 SETEADDRESS FORTUNA RANCH ROAD ENCINITAS, CA. wERMITPEE 60805EWEST BERNARDO AN11D ADDS' SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92]2'1 (858) 693 -2990 OWNER GO— L CONTE DR, CARDIFF PROPERTIES S6885 WEST BERNARDO DRIVE 0365 AN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92127 (858) 693 -2990 WORK TO BE DONE A.0 A S D. SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS ITEM E.D.R. 5.0.9 SYMBOL PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPERTY LINES EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED 8" PVC SDR -35) SEWER MAIN -_ -- B - - - -- 462 LF PROPOSED MANHOLE I— 3 EA. PROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUT S -3 C ]. EA, PROPOSED EWER LATERAL S 13 B 3 EA. 0 SEO 5 O OWNER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY AGREE TO COMMENCE WORK ON ANY IMPROVEMENTS N I HOWN ON THESE PLANS WITHIN EXISTING CITY RIGHT OF WAY WIT IN 60 DAYS AFTER ISSUANCE OF HE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND TO PURSUE SUCH WORK ACTIVELY ON EVERY NORMAL WORKING DAY UNTIL COMPLE EO IRRESPECTIVE AND INDEPENDENT OF ANY OTIES VO11 AEG 0 WI iH THIS PROJECT OR UNDER MY CON R-7 / �y(/ ........ 0 NE \ L(- �AJJMVS CrervS�. 2i✓iA P a N3 B�YB 0 LPN- 1G I —F os H-0 A 7 ?,op DEC' SARA RON OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE MN' C' Exp- 03/39/03 zs n DATES 1d /A1 fT� CML 4>E R. CUE. 295)) Or rni if // PLANS PREPAREDoNR THE SUPERVISION T OF RECOME Ei04ED -- AP PM I 1... PnoVlvo EoIEFl n��N�� ®������ ��� ((��[� !v Per .._ R_c -E C HEFT 1 L'ARDR+SANIl A IYUN IVISIRiCI SEWER NOTES THE 480 o �e x ^ o u o ¢o ^ hOAROB 480 LL WORK i0 SE GONE IN aCCOROaSTE WITH STANDARD PECIFICATION FOR PURL tC WORKS CONSTRUCTION (LATEST EDIIICN, THE SAN DIEGO STANDARD G1ACr1L PROVISIONS To THE SraNOARO SPELIFICAil'ONS FOR PUSL IC WORKS CONS1 RUCTION (ADOPTED SY THE SAN OtREG REGIONAL COMMIAAEE), THE SAN OtEGO REGIONAL STANOARO '150 00 VC VF d5 6 @ 5±dti: tlff o ws o GRA WINGS (LAUGI, .1"1N, ANN THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL PROVISIONS: 1. THEN" WIDTH sHaLL BE PER soasO No. S e uNLESs 470 IN o... o nin.,v v m .. 0 - - 2 DO % 470 "CE 11 M1OAEO. ia;E AC° PI °EISNAEoNNa E "Ba 3/4 INCH CRUSHED ROC, BENEATH MINIMUM ONE OF PIPE. PROPOSED GFAOE @CENTERL SNE a % 4.45 (B) ANO A B.s ASHES aIPE BE °DING FROMPBOiioM of PIPE iO (f2) rN LVE DF ENC. ROAD .. A.VP TIC 1111 IIALL 11 11., ANAVICT, .—IS I.CEPOTE 460 V 150 00 C VP1 438 92 C3..,3r50.00 � / ,, 2 460 Na TIPS FREE OFAINING GRANOLAS Mp iERIPL HAVING a SANG EOUIVALENi OF v m 9 M 30 OR BANNER. III A B.S WALL FIRE coot G FARM BOTTOI elaiae snu s / e° S LI° BE 114 LVBwIG 450 _� %433 D2 @ Si81 59 m I00 00 VC.. _w w W ��.® 199 ^ m 450 GREA iEF. F fa OR 3. ALL MA IN LINE AFTER COMPLErI'ON OF P ➢'PE LAYING umva nm / 121E I AVCE EWE BE iESAEO IN THE PRESENCE OF THE YNSPECiDR. IN ap 2 n ry . A SHALL BE USED UNLESS OTIEYWISE 1. INSPECTOR. 440 - a z R m v n / % X851 5. I . - 3,50 ( Gi 1X151116 GROUND @ CENTERLINE 440 SHI roN OF P S G S WER MANHOLE PER DR 11 FINISHED IIN11111 ATE1. TINT OFa PRECABA MANHOLE BASES AS ACLEP.YABLE FOR vCt SNCH COLLECTOR SYSTEMS WITH INSPECTOR'S 'VC F 5 iUA CONETRUC iION OF 4 INCH SEWER LA AERALB PER ANO NOT 5 ... SDRSD N0. B fe S 14, LAAERALB BHALL DISCHARGE OFRECALV INTO MANHOLE. 4.30... ^ 7y. INbERi ELENA -�'' soRPis SEVEN AION .. WAIN 430 s. spas° °NO'RSLioYO "r°FPECpNCR£rE ANCnDR WALLS PER ^ ➢S 399' 1' MIN ' CAOR NOTE F ALL MAYNB IND LATERALB SHALL BE CONSAFUCTES WIT, 42 INC, MINIMUM COVER. 7 00 % ' WC T P. A D VERTICAL LacanoN r EXrsrrNG 24 R q tl�' PROFILE, ADAM $ RUN THC FINAL LOCATION AND ELEVATION SEWER AND H. wa YEF MAINS A'S LA iERALe 'I'LL BE BNOWN ON PRIOR Ao 420 W TERALINE L LOC TD BEGINNINHOG 6 ETRUL ilON. 6g�LV @e % i n9a/ S 40' ar 1 B oRlGrmaL As BmLr PLANS, ACCEPTANCE OF WARN Y R .� ®WG. NO �.�� FOR 9. ALL DESIGN CHANGES'OF BEWER AIN. HALL BE APPROVED BY EPE DIBTRIR ENGINEER tM WRITING saREEra�r ENrasArAAN� �420 PRIOR TD ACCEPTANCE FDR PUBLIC OBEDETMLS. So. FILL AREAS MUST BE COMPACTED TO 909 PRYOR r0 PIPE INSTALLATION. 1 00 „ sat +00 3 x00 4 +00 5 +00 6 +00 7 +00 B r THE IN 11 IIIASNSPECItONLOF OF BECTNN IF YORK i0 ( 6a) 6 ENODIFERIAN SERVICES WITANIMINT FOR All GRAPHIC 6CALI 9 " -A0' - - _ 93 pCi HE EFIL FOG ,. 'N`11 Y OF mow, n, a� p •• - ••°'o" I O flFPL GH K. R1[j Y ER NOUN T ATHEA9 BOVE dFFECTIVE LACED 111 q, NOUNS, T N ANO /OR MATER 0 E E EUDENCEA ITANIE 1171-1 NCA ASK 15BETERfl10 Ih " "ITT I AccC N ;AMTS uN C RY a T ! } A v N A 85 ,E ci 1 2 J 14 UTILITY _ T _ WASHING ArtO HE ° rM1SauLRLi P AS A` - LATERALS LOCATED D WI HIN Poe v OR LANTRAL TABLE SEE THIS GRES, N — r m G ' v Gr00 �. _ l- FAI PATCH TO M"?AE°sMUYNWEERE- IN°T�il° DERITAIE ACCESS IFAE- ➢ I HARGE AD 1111 ANN PL UMBiNGEPERMtTS' ZCINp / ARE REOUtasD PRIOR TO N N To SYSTEM. N I 19. NEW SEWER MAINS LESS THAN 35 INCHES IN W DIAMETER SHELZ BE INSPECTED Y CLOSED q o IRS ITT TEL 0 TER COMPLETION OF AP j '����� A IRS ITT B L t 0 OF PSHEO GRAOING, N SUi PRIOR i0 PL CEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR PERMANENT iRENC RESURFACING, CONTRACTOR SMALL PROVIDE 0 ELEVITION INSPECTION. (SET:. 306 1. . G �m PLAN. PUBLIC SEWER MAIN - ADAM'S RUN �RCEL 4 f , REFER TO DWG. NO. 6277 -G FOR STREET - ®ETALSBMFROVERRENT DATA AND 2N C CENYER1Tk IMYA SEVER TA LAE GEARING DD,TA RADI119 lkNGYH 14TdAlN(S MID_P l&LTA PATH ](S'R _"151 63'19 ]2 5 °ZB D9 W 293 39' LE iER!IM1E ... -_..__ 60 96 SEWER LATERAL TABLE XPTH ENCINSTAS FIRE PROTECTION OLIVENNAIN MUNICIPAL WATER ✓A PLL �TXONTL H ]E @ LURE ENG ELE N S RB SLOPE CL'R RS ELCV 0 /W R /IN S 454 3J 555 33 2 44 2% 44C 12 4x8.2 ➢65' 4439P - l3 6 C 2% 45489 46006 256' 45513 ,I��iT REVISTBN6 APPRDVeD DATE —REFER IS 7_JLD MARX SCALE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT -- £NC AT .._�'....-_. 111L.1 J.rap� sTa VICIN17Y1MAP LEGALDESCRIPTION SOUTHEAST QUARTER F THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST D RTES OF SECTION OWNSHIP 13 SOUTH RANGE 3 WEST. SAN BERNARD INO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. A.P.N.: 284 459 05 SETEADDRESS FORTUNA RANCH ROAD ENCINITAS, CA. wERMITPEE 60805EWEST BERNARDO AN11D ADDS' SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92]2'1 (858) 693 -2990 OWNER GO— L CONTE DR, CARDIFF PROPERTIES S6885 WEST BERNARDO DRIVE 0365 AN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92127 (858) 693 -2990 WORK TO BE DONE A.0 A S D. SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS ITEM E.D.R. 5.0.9 SYMBOL PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPERTY LINES EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED 8" PVC SDR -35) SEWER MAIN -_ -- B - - - -- 462 LF PROPOSED MANHOLE I— 3 EA. PROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUT S -3 C ]. EA, PROPOSED EWER LATERAL S 13 B 3 EA. 0 SEO 5 O OWNER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY AGREE TO COMMENCE WORK ON ANY IMPROVEMENTS N I HOWN ON THESE PLANS WITHIN EXISTING CITY RIGHT OF WAY WIT IN 60 DAYS AFTER ISSUANCE OF HE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND TO PURSUE SUCH WORK ACTIVELY ON EVERY NORMAL WORKING DAY UNTIL COMPLE EO IRRESPECTIVE AND INDEPENDENT OF ANY OTIES VO11 AEG 0 WI iH THIS PROJECT OR UNDER MY CON R-7 / �y(/ ........ 0 NE \ L(- �AJJMVS CrervS�. 2i✓iA P a N3 B�YB 0 LPN- 1G I —F os H-0 A 7 ?,op DEC' SARA RON OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE MN' C' Exp- 03/39/03 zs n DATES 1d /A1 fT� CML 4>E R. CUE. 295)) Or rni if // PLANS PREPAREDoNR THE SUPERVISION T OF RECOME Ei04ED -- AP PM I 1... PnoVlvo EoIEFl n��N�� ®������ ��� ((��[� !v Per .._ R_c -E C HEFT 1 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE I HERESY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE RECORD OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SMDWN ON DE ATTACHED TENTATIVE PAROEI. NAP AND THAT SAID MAP IRONS THE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS OWAERSHID. I LNOERSTAHD THAT THE PROPERTY IS CONSIDERED (XMTIGLTNS FVEM IF IT IS SEPARATED. BY DRAM STREETS, UTILITY EASEMENTS OR RAILWAY RIG4TS -0.E -WAY. I FORDiER CERTIFY THAT I WILL NOT BY THIS APPLICATI CREdTE OR CAUSE TO BE CREATE0. IX WILL NOT HAVE PARTICIPATED IN THE CREATION W fMNE THAN FUA PARDELS ON "'TIGLLNHS PROPERTY E. SUON CONTI6WUS PARCELS AEIE CREATED BY MA.XAR IRE ' AARDTICIPATEE MEANS HAV COORDI IIIN6 TON ZDECI ISIS WN MAHING CAPACITY IN ANY FORMAL, OR SAEORNAL, ASSOCIATION OR PARTNERSHIP FOR TI£ PURPoSE DE DIVIF REAL PROPERTY, IT Wtl'ER SlBOIv COSMO C CONTE, U -0.9 CARDIFF POPERTIES DATE SUBDIVIDERS CERTIFICATE THE SAIDIVILER AGREES TO DEFEND. INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD HARMLESS TIE CITY D, ENCINITAS A. ITS AGENTS OFFICERS AW EMPLOYEES 1 ANY ACTION OR PROCEEOINS AGAINST THE CITY OF ENCINITAS OR ITS AGENTS OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES TO ATTACK SET ASICE. 0.0 03a3Y VOID OR AMNIA. AN APPROVAL ERON THE CITY OF ENCI111A*LONCE� ING THIS SLBOIVISION RHEN SIGH ACT IW IS BROOM WITHIN PERIOD SPECIFIED IN GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6649931 HIS CERTIFICATE IS CONDITIONED LOON THE CITY OF ENCINITAS PROVIDING PRIME NOTICE TO THE SUBDVIDER AS PROVIDED BY THE ACT. C. LYNTE. D.b.a. LAR]IFF PROPERTIES GATE LEGEND SEDIVISTON BOIMDARY ,rY PA— LEN£ EASEMENT LINE — — — — — — PARCE. N NSER Parcel4 CaK 11& PAD ELEVATION PAD 470.0 2f :FILL SLOPE _T�TT I - -21. CUT SLOPE I I y I y 1 EXISTING CONTOARS ----- ----- I-- AREA OF PROPOSED OFEN SPACE O AREA OF PROPOSED AC PAVEMENT ISEE TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS) i EX RROROSED RECREATIONAL TRAIL O' EASEMENT DATA © AN EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS 6 ELECTRIC PER OUUN4ENT RECORDS, DECEMBER 2B, ]955 IN BWX 5919, PAGE 565 OF OFFICIAL RECOROB. 02 AN EASEMENT TO OLIVENUIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT PER WUFBNT RECORDED MAY S 1961 AS FILE ND. 766OB OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. O AN EASEMENT TO O.IVENIAIN MRARCIPAL WATER DISTRICT PER OOSFEM RE'S'DE, JANUARY 31. 962 AS FILE MG, 18555 OF OFFICIAL NECODS O AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WdY FOR ROAD, PUBLIC UTILITIES AHD INCIIIENTAL WkNOSES PER WgRBNT RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1964 AS FILE NO 19804 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 50 N EASEMENT AND R OE WAY FOR ROAD, UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL RFE03E3 PER WLI RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1911 AS FILE ND 306534 OF OFFICIAL PECUDS. © AN EASEMENT TO O.IVENIATN MUNICIPAL TER DISTRICT PER WOIMENI RECORDED OCTOBER 11. 1974 AS FILE N0. 74- 272832 OF D FICIAL RECORDS. R&IC _"NR DOLT' 6_ O7 AN EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS 8 ELECTRIC PER DOCIMENT �ya� bN M21 RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1977 AS FILE NO ]7- 72334 OF LEFICIAL RECORDS. BQ AN EASEMENT TO OLIVEAWAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT PER FAS 1. i[D AMDALYLLLlDY DOCMENT TECORDED DECEMBER B, 1906 AS FILE RD. B9 6 ROD I{u RH mGilS�a 1E DFFICTAL WCOD5. S S 0.9 AN EASEMENT TO CARDIFF SANTTATION DISTRICT PER =O RENT —W RECORDED NOVEMBER fa 1994 AS FILE NIJOBA- 0655276 OF OFFICIAL RECOH0.S. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SHEET 1 OF 1 GENERAL NOTES ED USE IMRRD✓ME TS OF SUBDIVIDERS ADDRESS: WORD C CONTE db.e. CARDIFF PROPERTIES DOVE 1pLLOW ROAD IFDW ROD EAST WASHINGTON AVENDE FOR d'E £ ION ONLY R ESCODIW. CA 92025 .. -. - `-' RYEATI I but iMll_R1IIE1H4Tll I "j p'2 ASSESSORS PARCEL MM19ER: 264-451-05 lRYpS£O 46 .. ✓/ TAX RATE A r REA: .IS S f \ \ �1 F W ExtSTTAG TI/W TlMil `� ` yN5TAL1!B JSO TA L ' MAP SGI TINS ITS, CALIFORNIA CODROINATES: 326 -1707 1HOG:OW a meB jr, -z ilil �, TOTAL PARCELS' 4 PARCELS RES—I- I1Ijyµ, - I,Z i ,allGTaw.WArAXIrr4 AREA DEVOTED TO RESIOENTTAL.' 10.17 AL 5 4192 A iIV vAe Ra xA I /EF �T � 1� 1liuTF a AEarw' E SITE AYE INSTALL 6 IDS RECREATIONAL A' RAIL RED I STANDARD$ B /E IITIND hh 15 5 l/ oA 3. INSTALL 6" POLLED CURB �OPOSEOpE21 GUTTER (STD DW6 6 -4) �YL d PlDPO5S1 Z'f INSTALL 6' ROLLED CUPS S" VICINITYMAP FILL SLOPE S 6UTrER (STD DW6 6-4) g NOT TO SCALE -- _ -- INS-1 3 4 CEASE ,R ro,� SECTION A -A: 24' WIDE DRIVEWAY .1 TO SCALE _ EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD EASEMNNP. 45 AC EXISTIHE 11. D: C AC RRWOSED PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT: 36 AC iESZCENTIALZEI- AC rl r�\ _ OT MAX SIZE' 2.79 ACRES CRRE -IND AVG . LOT SIZE: 2.54 ACRES LEGAL IESCRIP— THE SOUTHEAST WARIER OF THE SWTHWEIT tt —RTER OF THE SWTNWEST WARIER I pfrvl i SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDOAD BASE AMR MRIOtAN IN THE II¢T�LL 'HD PAWIHdi 3ILWN" COLMTY OF SAN DIEGO STATE I CALIFORNIA. [[ pip - J" ss GENERAL PLAN OESIGNA TION' RURAL FESIGENtIAL /R.9 CisY.3 R9`�L0 6Bat -0,. PRESENT AMR PROPRSEB ZONE Ak DENSITY: .26 - 5 W PER AC 2 -BS -AC Y "221 A ^sJi _ HETWT: BY CODE 30.]6.]01 B] P D ]00 s LOT COVERAGE.' 35L J'� MINIfM1M LOT SIZE 2 AC EETBACWa FRONT YARk OR REAS m. BE PRESENT AID PROPOSED USE PRESENT (ESE —All LANG PRLPOSED LEE 4 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS .ACCESS: ESSF /NE J� -3065 VENHp T0-31 -71 A0 CDRDED r�dNlbd$00 JACK ROAD WHICH IS A PLBLICLY MAINYAONE) ROAD AID —I— RANCH ROAD WHICH IS A �ATI6NJALg TOIL I .3`` PUBLI Mi0AD, UTILITIES' NCN�ROTFIRE ENCITAS.- PECTION DSTRICT EE CRDIFF NITATZIN CT DISTRICT .—TARY ELEMENTAR SCHA'MZ'- N DISTRICT W INSTALL' P N6 -szGrt 'g ' o HIGH swoa.: SAM OtFWrTO NNraN SCNERL DISTRICT / ~ SOLAR IT— THIS IS A SOLAR — VISION AS REWIIED PROPOSED �¢a j.� ��f ' BY THE S"IVISTON ORDINANCE. ALL OPE1V'SFACE EA Y / PARCELS TO HAVE AT LEAST 100 SODAFE 9 Y / FEET OF UiWBBTgICTED ACCESS TO SUN.T6M ON THE BUILDABLE PORTION, TOPOGRAPHY: SAN LO AERIAL SURVEY TOPOGRAPHY * / MAP PREPARED BY W. A P SCO ENGINEERING INC SW.AN BE CH —1 CA TO, ' RTE A - (6 19) 259 -8212 t WAYNE" PASCO. 14£29517 EXPIRATION DATE: 313112003 DATE OF PREPARATION SEPTEMBER, 1998 (REVISED: MAY. 1999) Wr: RIDD CC FILL: ]2000 CY IMWNIP. 2900 GY GRADING NOTE GRADING SHOWN HEREON IS COJCFPTUAL ONLY. INDIVIWAL GRADING PLANS 9 e / ILL SE SLUNITTED ON A LOT BY LOT BASIS. / r PER 3p(GD G -12 ENGINEER OF WORK DeESSr 'eI QP PASA ENGINEERING y;p � Sod \ 18531 259 -8212 535 N STE . sanN4 BEAGH. NO 29577 1tA 9PO]s s FxO. 03/31/43' ,T - EXP 3 13110.3 ROE. 295]7 LOATE ��DF CAIF D re � is f i iiiNOH� ,! A 7 gip' 11 P atH` Are ) ET� (I R�O_Aen I� Lai ; INSTALL 6" ROLLED CURB GUTTER lSTO DWG G 4) iS s -- PAD PARCEL 4 Q yEAr c y, A, ai$si E'NSSTtN6� —INS ALL 3 AC - 55 f5. INST LL 6 ROLLED— TNITA 6 POLLS CURD 6 6U TER (I'D ONG G I �A'- Wi ER (STD DWG C-1) PROPOSED E1 PROPOSED E FILL SLOPE ILL SLOPE _INSTALL 3 AL_ EXI6rING� PVNT OVER 4 BASE GROUND SECTION &B: 24'WIDE DRIVEWAY NOT TO SCALE I— SECTION O -D: PMMT — 4' BAS INSTALL 6 WIDE RECREAll —,J FORTUNA RANCH ROAD RAIL PER CITY STANDARDS NOT TO SCALE 6' AC DIXE 2X MIN. PROPOSED Z _ _ A 2: f SlI1PE aAOVEF BA.tia , 1 2 SECTION E -E SECTION C-c (FILL BERM) DRIVEWAY Nor..ro scALE NOT TO SCALE ' PAR 1 _ P -442.0 237 Or 2106 ALMS$ NET A \ \ PAD4458:0 1 { WATER WATER LD LATERAL \I � { - Y �aa o� Pvzc�2v_' DL Cd S`fET - T (`p�, `. PAD=A- W k " �iE ly � ✓� r�AOPDS�DOPtvi�pA,Y'P.�fi%�c�fi X �� �3� 1 E � ri 11 3 RA -070 PARCEf.4 SS \ 1 `MACE'S ME / ly PAD- 20. 0 vAe Ra xA I /EF �T � 1� 1liuTF a AEarw' E SITE AYE INSTALL 6 IDS RECREATIONAL A' RAIL RED I STANDARD$ B /E IITIND hh 15 5 l/ oA 3. INSTALL 6" POLLED CURB �OPOSEOpE21 GUTTER (STD DW6 6 -4) �YL d PlDPO5S1 Z'f INSTALL 6' ROLLED CUPS S" VICINITYMAP FILL SLOPE S 6UTrER (STD DW6 6-4) g NOT TO SCALE -- _ -- INS-1 3 4 CEASE ,R ro,� SECTION A -A: 24' WIDE DRIVEWAY .1 TO SCALE _ EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD EASEMNNP. 45 AC EXISTIHE 11. D: C AC RRWOSED PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT: 36 AC iESZCENTIALZEI- AC rl r�\ _ OT MAX SIZE' 2.79 ACRES CRRE -IND AVG . LOT SIZE: 2.54 ACRES LEGAL IESCRIP— THE SOUTHEAST WARIER OF THE SWTHWEIT tt —RTER OF THE SWTNWEST WARIER I pfrvl i SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDOAD BASE AMR MRIOtAN IN THE II¢T�LL 'HD PAWIHdi 3ILWN" COLMTY OF SAN DIEGO STATE I CALIFORNIA. [[ pip - J" ss GENERAL PLAN OESIGNA TION' RURAL FESIGENtIAL /R.9 CisY.3 R9`�L0 6Bat -0,. PRESENT AMR PROPRSEB ZONE Ak DENSITY: .26 - 5 W PER AC 2 -BS -AC Y "221 A ^sJi _ HETWT: BY CODE 30.]6.]01 B] P D ]00 s LOT COVERAGE.' 35L J'� MINIfM1M LOT SIZE 2 AC EETBACWa FRONT YARk OR REAS m. BE PRESENT AID PROPOSED USE PRESENT (ESE —All LANG PRLPOSED LEE 4 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS .ACCESS: ESSF /NE J� -3065 VENHp T0-31 -71 A0 CDRDED r�dNlbd$00 JACK ROAD WHICH IS A PLBLICLY MAINYAONE) ROAD AID —I— RANCH ROAD WHICH IS A �ATI6NJALg TOIL I .3`` PUBLI Mi0AD, UTILITIES' NCN�ROTFIRE ENCITAS.- PECTION DSTRICT EE CRDIFF NITATZIN CT DISTRICT .—TARY ELEMENTAR SCHA'MZ'- N DISTRICT W INSTALL' P N6 -szGrt 'g ' o HIGH swoa.: SAM OtFWrTO NNraN SCNERL DISTRICT / ~ SOLAR IT— THIS IS A SOLAR — VISION AS REWIIED PROPOSED �¢a j.� ��f ' BY THE S"IVISTON ORDINANCE. ALL OPE1V'SFACE EA Y / PARCELS TO HAVE AT LEAST 100 SODAFE 9 Y / FEET OF UiWBBTgICTED ACCESS TO SUN.T6M ON THE BUILDABLE PORTION, TOPOGRAPHY: SAN LO AERIAL SURVEY TOPOGRAPHY * / MAP PREPARED BY W. A P SCO ENGINEERING INC SW.AN BE CH —1 CA TO, ' RTE A - (6 19) 259 -8212 t WAYNE" PASCO. 14£29517 EXPIRATION DATE: 313112003 DATE OF PREPARATION SEPTEMBER, 1998 (REVISED: MAY. 1999) Wr: RIDD CC FILL: ]2000 CY IMWNIP. 2900 GY GRADING NOTE GRADING SHOWN HEREON IS COJCFPTUAL ONLY. INDIVIWAL GRADING PLANS 9 e / ILL SE SLUNITTED ON A LOT BY LOT BASIS. / r PER 3p(GD G -12 ENGINEER OF WORK DeESSr 'eI QP PASA ENGINEERING y;p � Sod \ 18531 259 -8212 535 N STE . sanN4 BEAGH. NO 29577 1tA 9PO]s s FxO. 03/31/43' ,T - EXP 3 13110.3 ROE. 295]7 LOATE ��DF CAIF D re � is f i iiiNOH� ,! A 7 gip' 11 P atH` Are ) ET� (I R�O_Aen I� Lai ; INSTALL 6" ROLLED CURB GUTTER lSTO DWG G 4) iS s -- PAD PARCEL 4 Q yEAr c y, A, ai$si E'NSSTtN6� —INS ALL 3 AC - 55 f5. INST LL 6 ROLLED— TNITA 6 POLLS CURD 6 6U TER (I'D ONG G I �A'- Wi ER (STD DWG C-1) PROPOSED E1 PROPOSED E FILL SLOPE ILL SLOPE _INSTALL 3 AL_ EXI6rING� PVNT OVER 4 BASE GROUND SECTION &B: 24'WIDE DRIVEWAY NOT TO SCALE I— SECTION O -D: PMMT — 4' BAS INSTALL 6 WIDE RECREAll —,J FORTUNA RANCH ROAD RAIL PER CITY STANDARDS NOT TO SCALE 6' AC DIXE 2X MIN. PROPOSED Z _ _ A 2: f SlI1PE aAOVEF BA.tia , 1 2 SECTION E -E SECTION C-c (FILL BERM) DRIVEWAY Nor..ro scALE NOT TO SCALE Pf1BLIC TRAIL EASEMENT PLELIC UTRITY RNA LL B' MICE RECREA ZONAL RM4TIACIOi O YflIffY E! MPIIQITAL B LENr10/L EASEMENT J' PRIVATE PoAO 6 TP R PEF CITY STAAYIARGS LGCATIQI ff ExISnAA! B MA CON FAIS ro ._- 5 R2aI.TL SEMTR EASEMENT EXIETINE avu+lau aI memcTra aNr Reno, N BE _ SEE SHEET 7 FOR Bvar�Lrr ro Ire nreDraTP armrtta � rre -_ -- I PIABLIC TPo1IL QETAlLS -' HOLLOW ROAD / zJ 2'S'I 1.5 1.5' �"° - ',ifi✓«„Por - .' cu4B - PROrosED 21 F� }b1 S / ETA BUAL 6 E6 INSTALL 6" ROLLED CUr SLOPE ' 3 SSS i fB d59`f5m - 1�1V<AU".LM - rE r SIGy.. _ O OL"ER ETD Oh'G G d) 2K ,G� _ _ PRCPOSEO 2:1 INSTALL 6- POLLED CURB HOLL W � IpW RIW¢ EIEPSY 'iU'iM164$.�56w W R� 1r l \� � qXP yy q- AC FILL YCPE fi GUTTFA (STD ONE G-4) SAE 6" _ `Y INSTALL LL A 6C BASE d OISSIDATCR (3 It' IMTCXI g q0` . SECTION M`H I ' m I t (eLE�_P l�� A EXIgE1M1i 5 ION *X- „t\ y - )) ^-( - A B Fi '. PErRR- zD-- mloEwAr ~ ,,, �NODL JL Y F- / SECTION RIT_CC � 24'WDE PRIVATE R OAD U" . A NS TO SCALE P/L co`p5rn¢r EMx14 I p 'xaRAE E .Y AW � « m9Tnu a K As PARCEL I JXA mN,... PA14580 PROaos6D E s _ ALL PA�N:1 SIGNS d PEP 5B3J -G 2: 1 SLOPE INSTALL 6' ROLLED CIA'RB INSTALL E' POLLED —B AY 6 GU ER (STO DWG G -4) .3$- 6 GUrTEP (S D 0 G G 4) / �, , # + * . * k * cR60LL�EOi rFiEOFa'v\ 469.8 hP r A� )'SECTION E-E 12 PecoNSrRUCr LisreiNC� - �a "vMr OvE °a e LEASE ioPDSED �,h( rA PaLuaA �Rxo->w a2 uIa I J 5B o anu d A \ _— % t,nw k BE FECRCA 1- 1Aimaa L ND�II « _ FILL RM rxlsrr aw I : �' — #� � - _ ��� < ar TD scALE Exrsrlrvv PECaEArrorvaL raalL� SECTION &B: /Itf r po D 24'WIDE DRIVEWAY 6121 ! d�d99b dA9l FL Ff ono 1 �� 1' �o' NOT ID SCALE eeENne2x4Rfry N` A5TALL `r — - - �' RD h y V CENTEBLIN£ PL 1 —1 a w ¢ t * N Y 6 UTILIT FASEAEM 2 ro PArwlnc" - e ��,ZR��� LV SIGN _ n s .u.'r CM5TgUCrtp1 r rj� ? $ EASEMENTNOTES__. @ __so- _ENTExrE ..e A . x >K d i Fm LMIPSD & rq 1 8 r 1 >z' xrcE snGE EASE ENT PEP DOL. PEC 1z -zs-55 m Ag ass 4 '._, O eow: 5919 PAGE 5� 1 LPFSrnL a2LUros LE sEB ,/ / 0, 20.00' HRE IXIVENfAIN MIMICIPAI XAitR OISTPICT f(�Yf P NEC. 1 v -B2 As FILE 18555 OFFICIAL 4_9. I-.P 03 SO-00 ' HRE LRIVATE FWO 6 UTILITY EASEMENT PER INSTALL FIRE HY NT EXISTAG 4810 F j"L, /2 IN^yPIP -FAP LUC {EC. 1 -31 -Bd A$ FAE NE. 19904 LF OFILIAL RELC' > RCM FEME* \� -L EAEP^aY D A FER D -d0. d PRIVATE ROAD 8 UTILITY EASEMENT PER. WC. FEC. r , A doge k pS i^,� (f0 x6x1 ) O 12 -31 -71 AS FILE AS. SOfi534 OF OFFICIAL RECOILS. 2 IN ,qp q➢ * * .s ^ 5 DO F wm ON PAIRICS LFER D0.:. REU 10-11 -]4 AS � 2 "' B' ROE MECREA TIOJAL All * 0." 631.* �, INSTALL "PALYfHNG' S / O PEP CITY STAADAFCE INSTALL 4" AC 74-11893R CF CFFILIAL FELOFOS. �L 'PROPOSE• * INSrau rvPE 'E ac ovER s BASE MI rNS ALL T PE 'E INS ALLA'. {en D-l5 ry'iiN I - ©>J- gJ2334 (i' 6FICIW.CS. 1] -15 -]J AS F/P DIKE PER G 5. (AAkI. SEC U9E Rq. * B�CCIAG nr E v IS5IP r \y � �I, x OPEN SPACE EAS � (moD. sEC. LEE Pp.LED E%ISRR.G 20' x Ea4MNr } d * TEA Ox40 NO x 5 ]MSOYI * ' { * * k PER PIN AR :..' O 30' WRF OH w 0. EASEMENT PER WC. (EC. f2 -B -be CONE. CI MB PER C-4 CONC CURB PER G 0.T rolffi ]1911 AS * *Qy. N, + ♦ x 1 TI!<r AS F/P BB- 630]Je OFFtcraL FECOR0.5. STA ]+5z.g6-15Y1S.32) SECTION D -D: " all sT 13 zs 3r d �� }, +. . . . * k CAroIFF SANITATION DISTRICT EASEMENT PEP OX. TUNA RANCH + 6 OSO SIA4CE EA - ? rec 1f fa-9e As FiP se- ssszJB cF mFrcuL r,Em�s. y , RER,PINAL GEf MAP * 12' L E r`ipryA� t / EASEENT TO OAND. MEP ac. FEC. naz,1_1saL_ FOR TUNA rD scnLE ROAD .W * FRAIL« EASE PEfI ' AS PIP 41 LLPB D * . x G rreN PENCE �IL FINAL �'. ra.L 2 Baa<mc PI "�!_ Pao 4 'E Y GISBIPATLp FEP U °YE' * NAIL C )I ( x6 x15 n1SK1 11 LWlitICRP TO YHOPY EXACT MHRQNTAL B YEMSiL111111 S' 198 3S -- — `TNSTSLL Nb PS " S*1 .. N LfGTIIX! ff EA'Sf1AG 21 Mamxve P —m ROPOSED 2'J of * h 6 lMi OF LDAefM.CTIOW. ANY 0WIlm ro BE FILL SLOPE ICI 'NE Jla'®rA, A11FMI04 OF LIE ZE 5 UTTER IFEE FL 433.Jd W KWAY FILL SLOPE B'S A071 AC DIKE PER G -5 PROPOSES 2f \ 405-b BEGIN 43232 �� 5' TRANSITION r0 PAD 450 r }F K �yI B. code INSrau B AIDE G f2 3 RAD TRANS FPgA ClNELINE 6T0. LONG. ` B' CIXJL CLWR TO STO POLLED CLEB OF ROLLED cuRa IJx _ _ -- SECTION F -F: ADAMS RAh - 11 rD SCALE 2. H C m 405 iP T(\ L 1 ]8.32 fO10 MONO EGAD FL 434.)4 .5X PARCH, Ag19s Ih5TAL 1D hELL rNr ..... PA- -o 1 1 i,,;;; TAIL M- T (TYPI CIX4L APRON LIP STD. CONC POLLED 199 m. sL' HareT M-M rb DETAIL. PCL 3 AIII Wr vS3'z K cuwB/ cwx. AbRa4 ff Exmrtxe lA D. P 41es ,,,, vA �/ -. EIy ROAD DETA S DRNOOTTO OUTLET w.p -fl5a ¢tg1 —L- t f ¢w:vEATMaL 451. Ex L 4m_ 41F23t' ..a<" A, SCALE 'flir 1 — vrsmnm �r mre _ w mLre s1BS Rings sneBm. w ru raxlrrm xTBm RRUx rNEE rs TEET _..... EAS:'IEM FCP {.p1q'AV Ab Innnr� -� � ` � � Ea )EMI LEA _ III MY iA901¢�A W (F IM RFMEST SWEET /. EXISTING GPoIMD TEA M b1JTSA1 L- Fx14IUL 6EtfA LEA 6121 /B �^•' -%zfao IF0.➢E r.) VAFI�ES A% 3 1 5 ExISTIxG xeiEP.AF IA� g _ 2 DFiA L I - _. exT. 19r sr o u n w v-� NCH' - , 6 - B- cacPErE cline FDA BEDDRE. ro J 5 5 z PAD 4m D `LTA Iwaw 'x* Ix6rR8 — BACVING 1 IGK WI E •m>x ,­SRS, .-�- ronufl auuR rwB - a.. 1 LAYER FRIER FaBRIC Pai P°P�°G v P «. venruar a PA .� nn -A- rw Lw>au E' ' _ rte. SECTJON K -K: SECTION 1 -1: }raly BCMRA9 l \ M r' .1 TO SCALE U rr. <.� � 7 Fir,. A74... NDr TO SCALE a RW9 w 8 1 ,.z,'41 Hare urnrrr Eag1lEEnr PEA y vA9rws TEEro ff MDm. � � PUBLIC TRAIL DETAIL TRAIL �L HRAR ESEME ip PpFE5S70 �n0�i &'dt Hai PTRAI TREAD WALT O.t� C('utt9 'I r ��1� g 4� 1 —� N OQ A. Nqd x ILKER LINO PIPE CONCRETE Uµ„ i'GdlM (Cw: .. 3" PVL —IN PIPET -- rt �^ N0. 29577 DIPT PAI(HAY ° � Exp. 03/31/03 SEE SHP.ETSS &6FOR PORTUNARANCH ROAD A�ROVEMENTS srANa>Aw7 Pw.LED DETAIL: CURB OUTLET PER 0-27 6PAPHIC SCALE 1 " -50' SJ CIV1� Q q�I'' CAllf`+ NOT TO —LE 3 Y 0 50 100 150 C4 u a Aw v x °y, 0 Evlslows I APPRO­ I CATE_j REFERENCES DATE BENCHMARK SCALE sE PF APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN DRA Bat 7y _ �c.PAIX -s DESCRIPTION: CO. BENCHMARK "OC- 0073" FrZ� 5D PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APP ED RAGING PLAN FOR: z -\ CHISELED SQUARE IN TOP _ LOCATION: BW �OflHER ELLCAMINO DEL GATE: // BT: /1/L /I/7 NOMTE 6 RANCHO SANTA FE _lr R.C.E. NO.�$,iJJ GATE: Z/L/ Of BTDATE:a_ -Br TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN 6277 —G a1 ROAD TTCAL MAYNE PASCO ExP.�3I.Q3. (/1 "- ELEV 119.476 DATUM: USCCGS Y WORK PROJECT N0. SHEET Z OF B 1 SWAGGING BUBOES 1. PLE BEI PICATSNNBCCORRANCL PITH TrtsE PLAVs T sP EAR Pusuc w R� C i N,I 9E 'RJLTiO V. THE UE ;N cONSTRUCTIDN 5T ANOARI9 AF THE 0 L CIN'.'I'AS D E SPN U2EGU AREA RCGIO L 5'A 1 u RI Aw'•NbLSLl1 LL99 AN L4ANGPS oR Revr.sznv 'r EgNy':aoN RILLAESITEFAR INSPELITJAM iC GYSY E RI NF,CR PRIOR TO THE 901L5 HEPORi YEY PC PRPL1111111Y GEOi2CHNICAL TN 4.9LiGAifON PH(PO'EA 4 NI'Y RA L U FUR Tt NA UEA OLI EN IN CAL[ URNIA REPARED BY- DUNSi RLCAMOI ER-INC 6 FNGINEERI G III HATED, 9 6 CE U PIRATE ... S NZS TED 9 200 5 LL BE ON35BALL 9E OONC IN ACCORDPNCE WI ILLPLAN COMNENOAT IONS ANA 9PE'1- ICAYlONS CONTAINED IN PAID REPORT, 3- IFARA OL F 1HIS A DOES NOR PALMS 111 Ul'L' APPROVAL OF IMPROVE'MENAA WIit]N FIND �FROBFITNOFEWAYSFLE SL F'AHANER OF AIPHCV L6 ANC PERMITS OR 'EE 9HA_1 BC RFOUIREI IN ctt NJLN IO 11:TI Y U E F PLANS, ITS Ell PEI111111UN 1HA L 1E OBTAINED FOR ANY OFF SIIE HAD I. }[ rIRA` TOR y'AyqL'IL11'I9qq E ANY zE [C[ESSARY PRECgAqI ION [ U 4NV R IBG RAmaBED DA OENTROYPO'BGNAN BE REPLABE OHATIONS SFPAIRED TO CONDITION EXISTING PRSAR TO CRANING. A. T4E CE EL E SHALL EE E 9 T T Y ONUMEN Ol R SPAN S[ : I', ACTIC AF UEB "RAYII Al l GF C- E E : SHED AND REPLACED BY A BIDDERS.— CT 1L E 1 AFF, OF A I :CENBECI LAND SURVEYOR I. THE LO r4 ACTAR SHALL 0'. SIC CONSTRUCT VA PI NTALN AL.L S.I Y OEViCE P, I CLUO ANN SHALL BE NOTfFICAROIVS I. I'll EXIS E E VD AC IAN D UHR(P G U ]LY' 1 D A C PE s N a HERE fX Ns NE F AFVAINEU Av PG EARCF YL AVAILABLE R OROS. D T F A- AF AUA <NOTI „ „' DCI E F ADD N EXC'BTIN6 UTILITIES EYCCPT AS B:IONN ON ESE PLP N.�, "ON' 'I [HE CANIRACTOR S EAUIRE%D TU AS CAECAR U IONARY R ANY MEASURES T PRATE IT S O S THUS "USED PUCATFU I' E RK E C C D. S ESPONStiBILS Y I'0 CO CT THE' LL E OF SAID UTIRLITIES OR STRUCTURES IR10a TO L R 0 COMMENCE AE NT ANDWLOCA71ON OF UTILITIES AND NOYIFYCATIDN OF A- AINER5 - CRU 7GO) 933-2770 3. GAS B ELECTRIC -SEDRE IB00 P2 4133 C W17ER UMWU ( 436 A ELC ONE MAT -SELL (B001 39 3,59 L, C p E P, ( 2P RIPS UNDERGROUND SERVICE LE (300 ) SID -4133 ., CONTRACTOR 3 TI. - N POSITION 'S VEEJCC 4P, O OOHS AN, OR c BEGIN -N A vlOR< DA TILTS PROJEO T. PONE: [6016'43- 2'1)0. 6 S - HIS GONTRACTOA SHALL II A1 2 xouas NOTICE oM CALLS Foe FIUN OBOE- 601 6 N U LI WO iK PERFORMED W]'IHOU E E IT ,T D WILL BE SUBJECT TO EJEC'IDN A U HEMOVAL. BRANDS EIVGPNC4'.Ru CERPIFECRE Rk SPIN IBLE FDA NBNMORMI NO TL DLA STILE AND INEY p SAL.. U A F 1R EREU APRIL CRITICAL k. NG1 LF Y - OF TATt RE GJLAT,IONSETY A EALTH SIANDARD9, LAWS ANC( MECHANICS, HEREBY MEREBYILEPTI ECAiINATBA 9AMPL, NG T`DF 5 *l1UY 0 TC L,OiL30IL P.ND E0IIPMEN' OPQRA'fIN6 WITIIN ONE (ONRl 'I 5 WIT I SITE C IC 3 JI F '(9 /2) UT CC [0 AE' EE 'Y E OP E HP 1 1 N L STRUC' NE OR OMAN UCCJ C S L 0' BE 0 T E SOUS REPORT rOMP1LBE FROM tS S Y N HARILIC BETWEEN C HOURS B /. 0 -N. M FNDA IONS HAS BEEN SUBMITTED 0 E A ICE OF T E CL 1'1 :NOR CV SATURDAYS, S'JNU S Y NEL EN:] D HOLIDAYS . E GI CR ALO G 'ITT” U D F tE 'E CA. ED (N /A1 FU HC -.IA E I HAVE REVIEWED D - G A R D CE I E :( FAMINE 0 E .OAIENC_ UNTIL 1 PREGRAGINC RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED N T AVE MERE SNl FS BE HELD UNSITE III i E1 T E EOLLO ING PEOPLE BEEN INCIRPORATEU IN THE GRADING 'PLANS AND SPEC_ ICATIIV_. L 3A Al "4E,E N': EINSPECTJR, CIVIL ENGINEER SUITS ENGINEER, )] T4 CI'OR A" PF ]: T E PREG AUF E:� I , E L EDULEU WE 1 B T Al ' L S B U I A C' BY C LLI G (IBA) 6'13 12770, = V DIRT OR CONSTRUCTION - I 1[ e 10. _r OJ05 O 1R f Ion sS E I I LO JEL T E J[ hL ER S AL SUB(] 0 D IVE APPROVAL ROM NE E G1 E EN FDA HF OPO E UL ROUTE HE DEVCI OPER 5 N F (�//J S 0,{ SO SY6 Vt lT.L _,-- ",'p` COMPLY WITh ALL CDNDTLIO 5 Nc REUIFCMEAUL HAULING '/ ENGINEER MAY IMPOSE WITH REGARDS 'I'0 THE OD F': A 19N. ;, fF [. 21]O __....... �d" � f J �'? 1`. JF'0'J E COMPLEII ON AF WORK UNDER THE GRACING T B PHI OR 0 11 AI 6 DI RDA /M1O /OR YHA. EXP. HATE. JU JE 30, ECAF ry. M Sk Df AECIJRI Y 41V GRADING DEO DEP1 DEALS TIN DIAL BE 140 IDkU FACING, E 6 DING R 21 U Y -. S S II {E. DRMEU I UO s(w cR ANLL I r P _ x 77 r r AN THE F A( LU R RR E T',EI L DE H(II IA A Y' U(L 'HE T �I CR 'ou,i DEOLi1RRT1ON CF RESPON Ql3l! CH(ARGC I L4 YY DFL IF PM t GY "'I IS r VF S E C1SED ES 0 SiB F E 'JCS C E OE9i GN to CON3I3 oN III ” URRENT oYA VCARASTJ CEOEF A I HD sE 6 6 B y E- N Ei If IC,: C rI IVf, iCRAtTO 12. AIL LFl D1 NG G 4� L S I E f5 D EC l C H E EXC IO RL e D O t I �.. 4 c CI FILLS AND CO AcITCN HE., k SUBMIT SOILS RE 0 RED U ,LL r E T E C - S A E CLOCK 0 O DEG G6 NB 5 ECI YC f0 s S I 5 IS BO I PD O HF IE 0 L ANU UO U E A ..NGIHEEN D PV K D N , TICA IT P CJ r 1 J w. S 3 1 AB [.LI F MATERIAL ua0u oo LE E E 9 L B A F II 0 T LO AND I THE OR 111AU. VIIIFY mE HIM DIEGO LAS 6 CLCLieIC' ANG SHALLLRCPIORD1NATf HIS BOND W1YH IOVI N REPRESENT X A'EB- NOT... I L L PEL CC II IC RU NGAS SR R B/:III INLIND ls RC EC L EPA ID TJ TALAHTSONS FOR LOCATION IF ELEC RIC'AL CABLES AND GAS PIPING AN ,• 1 5 DI I iE1 'ERE OE 0 ']M C UNDE 'I 1510 ANU NT I B YO L L'MN Ev C IIINS Ef: PROPOSED EARTHEN TRAIL e F _ :1 1S E - 1 T U IN AC.O DAI CC E PPHO ED C'f, DING ND -. /II III B C Y D LA 'IONS hiE fY AB F DR L1 I c E - ' 0 _ T E CO AC 1 HOPE 1 6R RF L o '1 c1:5 E P0. f 4VE DRAS GE : f1EVENY IIIAIN O // I^' ll ✓� =G9 �C SITE/ I'OL i3\ 0 H L LUN ROL BJR C WAIEH P D +vUIU 5 AIR sNALIUY TAKE GENEDTAI FS 0 05 Pll ERDYSI JNC R .E, 25591 - C( FE LY SHARED AR;. TN rY I" F4CAANENT aF AIhI ;E Also er o...QN con Ro_ MEASURES HAVE DrEN 1Q.9'I'I II E. 91, AIL AR' S e FILLED SHALL B DIE ARC.' - IC F "D O GAINERS Q:ERTIFICATF: 'TIRE B A E E 5 L D I. CCUFD NCL I- T 5 F NITRO All VEGETABLE E 110 BLE ST 4Y STILL BE REMA ER BY E T rC L IF IC UPON WHICH THE FILL I AL'EI DO C FILL A o AL u I 1 I RE a ED o uI ADI C T C ST EE CR Y BL FIBER L GR O1NE C'fIVIiV AND DBE .ILL IL .I Y yy IVIIE �Fy t'I1eL1 0 PFRV15 "eR AU \f0E Uv 'HL L)11PACTlON B SOT SNAIL DE SC 1 TD N JF 6 E AB A C _ INCHES J N CO PAC Cc OF RE AS _e CPYQ. I 1 L A 9E sWRCI / (c)_ PI I1' SI BE THE DN c 0 BILL Y' Y TD SPREAD VA ER D UM YE FILL IN S r ]CD 9 q uN O11rt�SHgFN 0 /E A L1F 0. DNA WI' S E.S "SC 0 L R 5 BE CUT D I D 31 CqT a /,✓r,e H K wiz f9e.iro N� nzn roN A )E CE s OOT SURF CI 0 U - 9 E OPL 0 P N 0 MCI )N 9 DE "S AVEf] PL. EVE AMC ED AADDSRE( EU BY Ti. E 'IQE la 0' OR D Y IN EAf ND 0 OE I. (NU] ION L S 5 ROOTS A D D E S C 0 C) E IO OR EMBAN CN L t RE E BLE EC E 0051. PU IAI 1 BE TO p,AEU E 0 OP 6 L.L 5L0 BL ROUN DE k'. S A U LP WISH E G DS G D 1 CE IF. L ROSE BRU H AND ( EF OBJECTID 0 TER'. N RII I 3C OLLE A EI DR 0 ER I.E DI5 Dr ( 'F E z T E ON16d U 60 1 0 LC E FL E' 'r H BEEN E/REC WITH A NE D I IE E FFP IA LE C F'OM 1L LY DELVE 5- AT )LP TON 0 L B SE B THE ILL F l A W 0 OS15 EII, SH P L C ENGINEER .IOR T TH_ DISPOSAL OF NY LAID M fE,, , WASP(OA GGEETS FEY 'Y' E CHIP Y 1MEET P 64i DING P4 AN MEET 34 GRADING DEN fY ( N G IN EET 5 A 9 EEI 9 PHI' rI ALL 14PHD ELI 'HEEL 7 PRIVATE ]MFlRO \EI P. 4 ;HLET B CRCSIUN CONTROL PLAN RO E f ) P (TORT' 'R RLH ROAD) VT ALAN !r'ORTJNA A"IT ROAUI LAND;iOAP7MOF L s BE 4.. NTEO No I z I c s CIO n NCE ILOPOl AI'PROVEN U E Y E' - A. 1111111 IIIALL R U E L] E s NUS G 771 D L UT CU L L1 IR4ISATION STAN( RON T 3N6 U P ING LL 0 I 1 LU AI L PRIOR TO OL AGE' 1 O TE_Y1 IN CO L IDN 0 ARY SL,IES G ADED BETNEEN CTOBeR 9 ANU FQ1L l5. APPM1'IOVED A111CIVI G DATE ' D/' nR I" rF Elf CIERMAHK , a SACCADE COMMON: SCACPTiON CO BEN[ MAR OL LL90 PEL ICWTU C ISEADI COD ARE C D" LL )CATION' E F CHUB BANTA 'A �' El GEN[EI1kL )MF'Tdf ?VCMFN'�`NC)'IT'u WORK TA) BE DCNUE' [[ 1 C] EN6IJEE 6 SCRV fF THHPANTI,EM) FOR ANY WORK WITHIN SIHf LY BSGH D 1 ROC UIiAL E T. BE IA LF I'' ICI' GF k pp1 [Y D OSp S S RD LC SV E Cl' T s'S SHALL BE REGUIREO PRIOR TD CNONFCL'froNA YTEMR S D. SAN Oti EC MERIDIAN, BT ANUAf10 URAVlI VCs ) B. I1.IR. B. U.# TINDAL -. _...... ...._..._...- ._.— _.__.... ".._._ _._.....__. -- _- PRAJECT BOUNDARY I (VALUE S IRS p o ryERE, V q Iy ELMS AA,, SHOWN P,:I119 EF PPRUV L IFDA JYEOHNSTRUG- IGNOTISOEB ED1' PP11 ELi ITT, I A AEI. U GSAGR pDp C (( H[: CE RIGHT-OF OF -BAY B{e PHAPEA"TY L =_-- _- __ ---- LINES E IS I'1'NO CONTOURS PRDPO6EO CJT /FILL LIVE FTI L CONE v 111E OF iH HRU(:THOVSOEUEECP CROSS OF TER AND PAVING NIff ENCE AND IFIRCAT O F SESXIST:AN UNOERGRO(NU E Ft1AVAYLIASIF RGCOHGSETOI.-,HE NINE EG' SF rCLE SNONLE[B'E.Cn PROPOSED CONTOURS — PROPOSED SPrJF ELEVATIONS PROP00EA GRAVEL BASS (SEE SHEET 6) oc n PA RR PA o VA IF =J �' YHE F E RAISING AC LI E9 E %LEP1' As INS ON THE HBF,,, I E I RACI.R rS RE E A E SPNEA 1 A B E O E 'F E 69 IMG DR N01 AN ON HEREON HISE NO 0 CR YC S U OFggqq4[RIIE PHAPOSED P D" PEE BROW DITCH 1 -I1 -.� D' PROPOSED FILL SLfIPI:: YN, pHOppN IO--[iR-- 44 ryqq B 4S06E1 GONE SHALL BEIO I AEO D Pei L OFStVBELP NEE PRY OR 0 s RUC ON OF NEW OR L LXPIOR DR C C E TSTING UNDERGROUND E U 1C lEl LY ENO D LO.BYRJLYION ( ERMIT ACTUAL0 GCA ABV GB E 15T1N6 RDSSILII 11 NECESSARY SECA4ISI OF PROP05C1 GRAINAGCBSCWALI`_ I1% M1 N.) - -- RROPU51.'D IP -RAP ENERGY DIREI PAI'OR ID -RUB) (RTII11L ,Y '- EE P.) ROPOSHU 6" AC DIKE (TYPE "A "1 (0-5) I THE OR 111AU. VIIIFY mE HIM DIEGO LAS 6 CLCLieIC' ANG SHALLLRCPIORD1NATf HIS BOND W1YH IOVI N REPRESENT X A'EB- NOT... I L L PEL CC II IC RU NGAS SR R B/:III INLIND ls RC EC L EPA ID TJ TALAHTSONS FOR LOCATION IF ELEC RIC'AL CABLES AND GAS PIPING AN PF OPUSIED 4" AL DIKE (TYPE "E ' "I 6 -5 - - ( 1 PROPOSED GUI C. CURB D C TRANSITION _ TO I PROP01E0 OD. IED RO..LEO TUBE I -- '� PROPOSE 4" AC PA VE.MENT DVER 6 BASE ANC ES. AELEPHONE . Ell 422 5,35 (015 ALERT) PROPOSED EARTHEN TRAIL e F _ :1 1S A UR SP AIL NO 1' P CS I; BELL TELEPHONE COME ANY PRIOR NVIE HIS( NG VCR NEAP LONPA VY FACILITIES ANN S ALE LODRDI � v( AITFI CONPAPY RE LUESENYAYI /ERG. NU'YICE. 0 E ES WT: HYIV iHIfi������� SHAAL!AFIONS. OR E151ONCOND PROPOSED 24' AVCME'[U' APYi01 IU�'1) PROPOSED 3' 141 DE MOC.PCC DOWNORAYN ,D -221 d E EXISIYIVG FENCE REMOVAL 6 RELOCATION - - PROPOSED SLOPE HYDROS(D AREA (SEE STREET 6) 441Q )'RF I L AIIY A P F NE IATINACT PACIFIC BE IF EP rELLEPHRANE 1 BOC 2 i (DIG ALERT( PROPOSE "NO PARKING FIRE LANE " flI51V 1 PROPOSED RASL WATER PARS 9 BE C RESPONSIBILITY O - HA E OPE T I y O CDR' L "' E Y OSEAT E CHEWS OAFS -COCA THOS IFFNEPRFGO PROPOSED BRUSH _ E" RAIL ': -1 "u PROPOS_ CC CROSS OUTER 10 A E E SC IC I J PFOJECI' E 'UNUY4 GRUB NO 'i ]0 "' ION 0 CABLES AND APP RTE EL CNI i SOO 22 (SWF(CU) NOTE " PUQ( R D R EB 1 C RF IS A 9 9- SHO A ON 1 E "A BUI J : WSNG AIL SOURCES LL OC l0 1 FL I 4 TI IL YEc ; ' PROJE(O S C II H E.' E RCCB CO TRO f CA ­El 92 U U D� CE ER PERMIT N C s 0 ) S E LYSL E SQUIRE IJI'F RTES I t L Ys E l E CI Y 0 ar S i. OFF I "'E C ALAN. WATER RUNG AEG OLI I CU ST C IDN C Tr IN ACCO OAN I WITH S I[ IERMf STAR FR POLLUTION E E S L PP 1 0 i OR DIG FROGS I.. DE IJPFO AND IMP! EN FU C E 1 1111 EV _ pE ' ME C B OR IE CJE E EER OF w0 1 PRIOR L JP LA0 VLL ] � L SNG C IVI IES ND AMP FTE ANN C R F NOSY E O TN EIVI ORON IT TLFU 41I HE S FCB RC EY LM. BE FILED NI I f z 1 1 Cl COMPLET 0 v+NOJtCI SHALL 1 5 LUN1 U li ' TG E �,,; TITLE C I \E CC Of ED UI LI 1 CCN AP OY 414 I':E(UM C I CF DICE -- -- R(5 PORTION rF ' CHE B :a '' HAi B 'IF ULH 2.V111"11 C 1 5 Es CND6 SG HF E OY COMEL I92 PHOVISCBA P IC 3D 11 D 5 0 I L AE S L 10 PCH 0 L EE ( 633-2770) ft AS _e CPYQ. I 1 L A 9E sWRCI F' 11011 10N .� 1 NATURE C CLe L IT TE 1 F OF Y: NOR THE (':TL.,, 0 G A-N­21, OF T­r ITIGAIE r WO E S III WDIATBABLE) IY IYAl LAND ES '3'4111E I F 0 ICE LTOYF AND ALLOVI - JO D9CAPH OF I G Lo N: SIGNATURE .Olb� /'E11 I", SNE IELACSD 9 A RELY EHLO 1 4 1 DR LICENSED D _ �jQf/N F v _IVTeo TAME OF ACT THE LO E LL E C SE ER ' _t £;£ /D£%A AN E' OSPECHTVELI S PLHESE SAYS,! ',ET HE FACE OF T4 TITLE CURB. YHN AE'lcIHAC6LCAEIIAOH L0 .VEOL019F T,`'' ' D M E CURB IN A WANE I V ACLDBCAN.E ¢'.H THE STANRAAND "RFOY t( IJU S DI PUB(IG WUR AOD19 cN (LATEST C JIG. YHE 5 DIG STANDARD SPECIAL RURAL : E S DA D 6PF Y iC IO S B f 0 1C w$o$H fi - IRAN ( ED G EGIOONAODIIA D RC N041HVGSO(LA ESi D F Rf lV lyreLE LEGAL DE5OWP'ItON SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF 'YHE I`11"INEOT 'TARTER OF THE 90UTHWEST CA ASTER OF SEC'I'YAN 4 SI1IP 93 MOWN THEE MANGE 3 WEST, SAN STATE OF MERIDIAN' IN THE couN'rY of SAN oIEG1. STATE of cnuF-uRNIA. A.P.N: 264 - GH -05 SITE ADDRESS FORTUNA RANCH ROAD ENCINiTAS, c PERUGTEE' 9ENAMEL OEVCLOPMENI COP.ORATION P 9 EBB. NEST BERPLARDO DRIVE ARE' SAN DIEGO TFORNIA 9292) NADEL B9F 1990 OWNEON, CUBAN C CCN rE CARDIFF DIFF PROPERTIES EASE NEST DERNARUD DRIVE p3B6 BAN IE60, CALIFORNIA 9292I DDB) -2990 ESTIMATED OULAN OTIES CUT RICO C.Y.0 FILL 92000 C. Y.0 IMPORT 2300 C. l.0 n "'IHWDRK QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATED FOR PERMIT PURPOSE6 DUTY DEAL ON EORETICAL OASIS. ACT IAE QUANTITIES VARY Bill` TO 3HRTNPAGE OR SWELL FACTORGI . �.. IF ENVIRONMEIRA1, NOTES. IR ( " LEY YNGSANE EXIST INRLNAN AARPI OPESjU AREA IS 24`6 2 R LEY E P AI DEPTH OF IIT 11 3.5 APIA LIFE'. MAXIMUM I[DAI. FRIDAY r FILL Is 91 . . L. A.1 AVERAGE DEPTH VOLUME OF CUT (C. .) QO�v IY OF UT AREA, OF CUT (5. ,; 12I. 639 B,) AVERAGE OEPTH V(L (C. .) 92, X 2 AF "ILL AFIEA (JME OF OF HILL FILL _ �000 ,r &I I ^I J o 0 AN _ H� \.. HAY IR KEYMAP .1 TO IIALI @COY MAP LEG R15 ?FAD BOUNDARY AS WER �® -ILST- RATER TED ROPED FIRE HYJPANT m FR, AS PREPA,,cD . F T`LIUrP F OF tiF GOhiIF :0 Br PI LY L. i w® RU 6 L DATE +co BITE EI NO PARKING FIRELANE NOft 11 PAII " I 6 I E 6 I LL BE P U BE .Ev1 PIRRATERCEAD('CRTIFICUAQIAN S CCF TI A C ROAN IIdPF Ii:." S I9 PL BEOUIREDG A D IN RO Os IN AR AN '2 0 N ON IN ONE THE FINAL OE CCN A OTAGGE 55 0 -" C1 D 1. L E P DS L 32 EII E FROSTED U 1 AF E ARABS MORE FEES BUT :B A F- T I U S, OSTEU UN BIDE ONLY I AL BI E 50 FEET C EN 1I N L'VIRES SIDE' 9 ALE FD U - ROT ICE C CA TP 9P Zlr Ar.R TI'C .FNOAROB N[1 A'fE EfRCE sIPL EY: 1 41 ✓ GATT `/.I `I IT , va S, ROE—j—­, — FOR ISIBLE PER EIRCINYTP6 Q'FE5 I- ACRES( ) 5 0 FET F G S1LOC CFO CI SCIESS (.� (_) T ...V, LSMALLLBENLY FIRE L1r PAI " "MEV STA DARDG r C NO I E %R. OT/h/03 n I'a� t .Ge� d GSSTRICF CNf CNTTA,a�F IRE LIE. G�ARTMENI SVENHA T.N 11VCf "TF >AI WAFER CIFF Af P VE ®OI PO AB LF FR `iYSTF1R APPa'� A1.. AIRED E7 9Y /NO / 0 4 y /�A/ ,A.. / LEGAL DE5OWP'ItON SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF 'YHE I`11"INEOT 'TARTER OF THE 90UTHWEST CA ASTER OF SEC'I'YAN 4 SI1IP 93 MOWN THEE MANGE 3 WEST, SAN STATE OF MERIDIAN' IN THE couN'rY of SAN oIEG1. STATE of cnuF-uRNIA. A.P.N: 264 - GH -05 SITE ADDRESS FORTUNA RANCH ROAD ENCINiTAS, c PERUGTEE' 9ENAMEL OEVCLOPMENI COP.ORATION P 9 EBB. NEST BERPLARDO DRIVE ARE' SAN DIEGO TFORNIA 9292) NADEL B9F 1990 OWNEON, CUBAN C CCN rE CARDIFF DIFF PROPERTIES EASE NEST DERNARUD DRIVE p3B6 BAN IE60, CALIFORNIA 9292I DDB) -2990 ESTIMATED OULAN OTIES CUT RICO C.Y.0 FILL 92000 C. Y.0 IMPORT 2300 C. l.0 n "'IHWDRK QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATED FOR PERMIT PURPOSE6 DUTY DEAL ON EORETICAL OASIS. ACT IAE QUANTITIES VARY Bill` TO 3HRTNPAGE OR SWELL FACTORGI . �.. IF ENVIRONMEIRA1, NOTES. IR ( " LEY YNGSANE EXIST INRLNAN AARPI OPESjU AREA IS 24`6 2 R LEY E P AI DEPTH OF IIT 11 3.5 APIA LIFE'. MAXIMUM I[DAI. FRIDAY r FILL Is 91 . . L. A.1 AVERAGE DEPTH VOLUME OF CUT (C. .) QO�v IY OF UT AREA, OF CUT (5. ,; 12I. 639 B,) AVERAGE OEPTH V(L (C. .) 92, X 2 AF "ILL AFIEA (JME OF OF HILL FILL _ �000 ,r &I I ^I J o 0 AN _ H� \.. HAY IR KEYMAP .1 TO IIALI @COY MAP LEG R15 ?FAD BOUNDARY AS WER �® -ILST- RATER TED ROPED FIRE HYJPANT m FR, AS PREPA,,cD . F T`LIUrP F OF tiF GOhiIF :0 Br PI LY L. i w® RU 6 L DATE +co BITE EI PUBLSC TRAiL EPSEMENY -- tHACrfIA NDTf.' -- FUN fL' VIILITV L l LWIiAACTLq IF VER)}Y ENACT FIQRIIg4TAL 6 lERTICAt EA fMENi 2>' IPPED ROAD 6 ­ALL 8 WSOE RECREATIONAL ." ]E 4 INSTALL 6R(/9HE0 -- OD F OW nMO '2 -_6. xE - IN9 ALI. 6" ROL 0 E PU6L IC SEWER EASEME i2 YR IL R 6TANDARDS f 'E T 7 FOR -tea wan�rn�rrr�r»xrav a IN-, �rALL SEE SIEET 4 FOR zr FEr+6 -s \ zz z2_ E Is I c -. _....... @V OF E dSTPW H MAIE(A. P� rc rpalL DETAILS RG D 9S 1 09 PQAMS PoNJ _ 25 / OPE { 3 - pONCRETE 0 099 MG y \ r� CUTE, (510 DWG p 41 2% 2 55 DEVE HOLLOW AOAO F NO PARHI GSGN a - _ . f pF +osES an - ETxALI 6' -I. cuae 1 � � C7 ®VE HOLLOW I C2 eD.- RIPRAP ENERGY NB9 42 90'W 65256 : ' 1 (IMN TM PER n 4D ROAD g R ». a c� F IL sLoaE ER rsro owc o-4z HEC rEALIfk CF WVE HOLLOW Raab ,,,���QQQ,;,;,;'''��y999 'CAF, PVM OVER AC AEA kiS HSQO 6 bll R£P-R A ENERGY - �' ' "" PCL BROW OIrCH PER 0-15 i 6" BASE Ri / ✓ OISEAE TCK rs a I THICK) \ ao 15? \" NA A' -c rr SC7P%(VEWAY ©EE PRIVATE ' EXSStdM1G 8 T,-1, iNE A40.9 L / 3 5 45^46 FL ~LLo - - j �. PFA G tFOH —NOT TO SCALE f�pT rp sLALE q • EE9 o E S N R39 X L 1 / >r� --.- 'w lL GURO 1 Po 24' W OAP „ eA9B FW r d55 Y 9i LL NO P 4<1NG S1GN v� PROP`USEO Q! Al \ S6 A. P/L p `N ddf3 " LONS RUL SON FENCE I d 1 ' FL 4V— �G' 1 E � #IFl 698 EXISrIM1G A41�RP WAi" 5VL .`d h. `I PARCEL! PCL 2 - ° 69 B L fp.15320343258 pe kN Pl eat PPAPG4Y8.0 ,. T! -r _ PALL NPAL'�4T0.0 9CGNBJ L P PROPOSOp ER� YN "- ACj.'ESS ROAOWAYPER 503> -G ^^ 2= E n S b HD PARCEL.? 5 9 ! PAD_d420 a A_1 OSLO F1 PS 4 ST. ➢6 nRI EW L pea G C G ] MODS ILO plx 469,8 g'Mid_ R^ RFC F L 1 �4 a L - 1 11,, ILEA taus BC Nam' � f I SECTION E-E E 111' +Y ov R 6 SASE I LL Y PER >F I A2 /;. 0 1x r 1 FILL BERM r 1s'Irnc ALL I Al tux Iv-RAP EnERbv Issr A aR _ p _ T, PF cz D 'u &EG770N E E a +c,mlu nERn4a,- (10161 ➢5 C '-'"" 1 rMrcrcl _ e IL i Y�d �Y ! 3 �- G r NOT TO SCALH Ex G RcL Tonal E4'VI71pE DRIVEV/AV I3496 \ 9 2 FY 449 ➢ FL 3 l—%T I to IHr I_� �... p�0 1v ti 43i 'a 441 0 0 SO V'ceirrtw,wE rHrvare zoaR( L 6 MP - N� _ m , 3/ 6 I!P/ YNS -Y- CE EALINE PUIkTL RO 0 PER 5 �.�o PARCEL 2 SA rxNC o - w s UTILITY SEAS E n' A:. PA-,43ba •. PAD�lSOA. SIGN v sa s ae c G RUC TON N ° a 4 afi. �9H r�w I o .bASP14AENT'MPATES R 5260 rERLrNE a L E E q Y PA0. -4,500 9 r FL' ' — SLOE LA E DEC REC 12-28-55 IN ' 3 ¢ 4W — H ttP {{ - g ()pK 519 PAG 555 Cr OFFICIAL REL'OROS _../2 IF h A - X , r - Ck Cry �{ oy / 448C FL, ^ 00 WIrR 0.Y E C L /FE LISiRICi q B �� 4 -' RRP 4J66 F( F2' CxWcM"fd)JFY l EEMr IE} BAC R S tt N0. 18555 - eu. m SEFICIAL RLLOCOS. -}- 4 96 r YNSILL FIRE NrDP'pNT z� Ex Al.0 ORp N'p C_ m V g9' I �.�¢toF 449 m IlNSrnu ecI Rzo J 00 Recfi - ESREAD E¢o. IL sso oar LPEa fin' WIDE a C. EASEMENT ER DEC' REC. fa -11 ->4 As "y rDNSraucrlbN rENLE J , In191\ALL Np sIGN- °v ENERG ASS iP Ck ER 5 �P )4 -21ZS 1 pOO FASESEAT PER 5 I� pAp Co Sc E I z sr L -.. £ J ER TY 5 A N' " INS ALL CC QRAI E 175 WI 2 "Y L e � Q -PR ®P ®SETS �6 ,:0. 6E. EASEMENT PER OOL' HES 19 15 -7> AS TIP INSTALL TYPE E /C OVER E" 5ASE MI 5 LL, iG E 'E" C EA.sF'rvr ' ' 6Anezlw PIP AAP,cNErG Gr s1PATaP \ 47PP.IV SPACE EASEriBE,IVT LIKE PER L s >- 233 CM" LP ICIAL PECLROS. (00. SE USE ROLI.EO .,PEP 040 (]0x6 + ➢,9 TIrLY<) - ,Y > C, (><O, D. E SEMEN E OOC REC. 12 -6 -66 C0� LURB PER 60 'I10 WAS R9 E G FEx``R M Rz as '+ - x �; `' An PER F%N PARCEY. MAP / s a 13 z .32 .361 nu.l %2N 9251 ' 1 > RU AA C ; / 6303 ¢ CF CI" SCY I R:CpRW. CIA N52 46 1h +]H 321 iEC7Id7N -(.7: u FrN L L A GEL /'! 1A 1 s EN PEA nlaEmRes. PO{iT41NA RANCH ROAD w` _ .PROPOSEp OPEN SPACE EASEMENT k - - PERFAVAL RA$C &L MAP - , f\ �F rR II E sE ..r _ lu Al 6 PER x Not IS - _ toys rwc ION avcE- , BE - fs s'EET J k , E Rev s r SEE - -. s x Fes.. m nur 24 nArerxsng auw re o o ,.. �D, e.ar._• wu 6 RCWAP4IAG a+ arse Ir (]0 6'x15 9dLd8, k 0 Y O'OFRtaVACY PARC ..I) • \ Y / �CLiViRACTOp ib VERCM�:fNCFR LF WC6M -__ T Pil I NpTl I) �� 6 L P Y EXACT IFAIZ(WTAL H YEATICAL n,�rmv. aw aro-LnrH Ta � _ 0 NezaiE nrrEr4rHav rr¢ - F , •o %sL. -_ r sf L o Pc ac ulvr r r E - PRLPrzsm z'1 / a T� � Ff nsz ez 1 Fzu SLOPE '192 5 405 4 Fi ! - ' N A30 0 FP E BEGYIV 433 34SI TO Y 5 L 6' AO 450 326 ;6- a GRD5 rYER '� - I:N WALL E 00 FR \ L RBLTNE 3T0. SONC. hr '2 Jg 292 ' StN SIJ G 2 3 Ran HANS ou cuae rD B o ROLLED taus S�:CJTfCD106 �r -E: oq�' :so 4D An — 6O L�O WRa f ti %i " o A9An rroT ro cn % F! 434_ 19 - IT 1 PARCE A10EHP av- m �. ./ 4 do o uv DrRGD - 4lY3O 4069 IF e 1 % ryA�,ry II�5 L 10 F. SPSCASi 4 — 4f9�6J _ kAFI=a20D Ev / \ \'¢ A ✓Cl 114 {55.1 TASFALL M 10:Wy.L MMBENY Frl Pl WNG gpRLN— LIP GTO OONO ROLLED I \\ PA Ezo I 1 4156HP - EFy / CORE/ pONG. ASSCSY oK P ry ' E '� ¢ / sD' s FL w ' b - a •• r sxEn os a� t J 1A. % ENTRY ROD DETAIL _I LYI'TAPE„ No AO-IS TL POD.. et a PDT, "E 1 1 o FL' - - y� LO LCrD R� 451 P 5 RE£� �! / I SY Sif)F'ECl 'OEB S S 'y:,. 3 ExrsnNC c9ounR rrW a F !o PR 31NFr slo l diAN04d O's56 a3 __: -� __ - _i7A&7 z.w \ -°"`` - -c ,. Ym; :ufia'.mr No APaoNT saIA HE �nic°rc� 1 ED Exr az u _ �. ry � E va,.i - TP AK W SE°�TBC7 1 9: ➢ Pan _ E CURB 90LAYEBROOIL ER FAIC 5 5 " PROnOSEd GRADE exrsrYrvr> 42 a Aunx - �3 a "¢ ? ° DIaL / Ezo J SEC ON K K: u w ..._..1 Ya ICALE ._.__.._ .4 - e 1 a I NoT "TO SECH -E p 2 y SEE �NEEr a Eaa e � � 211 "1 n �' t RB ac MAIL CETAILSs m m R °+ p — APE ID L IL EASEMENT R AO JIO QppFC5510A, ICK BRUSiiEU COInLRETE 'vQpa � A. p -0S Z _T IL FADS / DOVER CRAIn (IPE 3 P L ORAt P E ,SEE SP3F,E'TSS�6.o:YdYd.D:YASdTIJMA RAItiCI <?'Cdtl'ALl'PRdPPi ®VEMEN9�S OZ RM�AY� L %P U3/71 /03 n NOARJ ROLLED CURD (G 1 GR IRCI SCALE 1 - =s0' sy ctvt,L DETAC C;dl&i€E C7'4JTL.ET LEE' D -17 +.�O4F CALlf� NOT TO SCALE 0 eo DO 550 .�� _�.... ._...,___......_....... ___..__.__...._.. _,._...,_._ _...,,.___.,,.�__ 111R. e. 4�evkro e. ___...._...._ IDNB ROVED REf NOES DATE F]FNLHMAPif SCALE - -- E,F n APPROVAL. S _ CIIY Of- ENCIN:CTAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO. � DE fR1P IIO GD BE LN R L 0 PLANS PREPARFO UNDER THE SUPER SS10N OF RECOMMENDED APP $ /EO q�qM��� j/I/�,��/./,F(9 '1111NG PLAN FOR. i L ISE ED BOU RE I TDP I, , sL' • BY ...._ �,_ — - BY: R, Y�N.1 9,! ,iliF { /�RNN,TF 1. ® � a�A /���81�AI RUN �' U C.. / I —V 1W 0' CAOWALL DA E / //i mm�m .. y_._ ... ..— DL ION: CORNER Ei. INO OEI _ -- _ R. El NO, X95/! 'i ROAD e P CEO SANTA FE �l✓ 't 1'A vEUr[ca N!F 4WAYNF N SCO GATE: 9t L/ UI DATE: 1 i .. EV 119, 4>.- OA UM'. UBC66S SAY 13/_03 ...°°"°"'°"' __.. -- __. woarc PROTEST ND. SHEES 2 D� B 480. 9t 10% ' ' 0 ol� a_ 4B0 w No. 2951] m 954 4a j QJ aJ I'LS'q '♦7 / '� E H° _..VL,. 57: OT @ 5±60:6 N� v -' 470 PROPOSED GPAOE @ CCNiERLINE . � � — ADAMS RUM '4;', A, SLaLE P " =e4' fYNm CFO A.,A35, 460 Pf.43a.9 3 +54,46 460 460 4 VP 3 5 % 0 46 � { 1 440: x 440 z- EXr9TING rnaoNO @ CENTERLINE 430 480 2 00 % W9,gM 915 M �11 n c a i vEP1Er 11111 1111 AL ' Pyygp�Bµ mq�j� �`�" ,'N _. •) 4G 0 A O VERYi cat L4LATIGN aF EXYSYINa 2Q SCALE, NOR I 4a' TcR came yewa ra eC.(NG caNSreucrmMnr a R420 3 +00 _'', 2 +00 3+00 4 +00 00 6 +00 7 +00 8 +00 GRAPHIC SCALE. 9 " =40' P AR N,1d2LF!! 4& H FA:ROFP. 3 a K H �agF e PE 6 j - ms A.L R'4 PArmrNC" sr9N ¢ti j — Isrtw e" rErxrnE x wa PER Gmua Ex'rEN;rzov a3a [q]9 p I ­L smis:¢o c4mcuE e rw x 4 Fli41. TAIR — x121 -A I E Ts I FcLwEAitCNPL Ta eE RECR`,5rF4CiF0 5 FL L+G 5 i R' nun rs G � wl 3 coNCa�EiE�R j. x Ln+4.— 6 "' s ANOann ncA I L4NDETE IL: & GU C DETAIL: PrNEOFSPR1Al01 RAMP 4 GLALE SL6 il;i T l FOR 9t 10% ' ' SEF SHP,HT 5 �A8F6"FtP;A77OR1.4B,'TAAId, FLAN PAOFesszam w No. 2951] m m Ezp. 03/39/03 s UP P AR N,1d2LF!! 4& H FA:ROFP. 3 a K H �agF e PE 6 j - ms A.L R'4 PArmrNC" sr9N ¢ti j — Isrtw e" rErxrnE x wa PER Gmua Ex'rEN;rzov a3a [q]9 p I ­L smis:¢o c4mcuE e rw x 4 Fli41. TAIR — x121 -A I E Ts I FcLwEAitCNPL Ta eE RECR`,5rF4CiF0 5 FL L+G 5 i R' nun rs G � wl 3 coNCa�EiE�R j. x Ln+4.— 6 "' s ANOann ncA I L4NDETE IL: & GU C DETAIL: PrNEOFSPR1Al01 RAMP 4 GLALE SL6 il;i T l FOR 9t 10% ' ' SEF SHP,HT 5 �A8F6"FtP;A77OR1.4B,'TAAId, FLAN PAOFesszam w No. 2951] m m Ezp. 03/39/03 s QJ aJ I'LS'q '♦7 / '� E H° N� v ® °^ ADAMS RUM '4;', A, SLaLE P " =e4' fYNm CFO ,.� >s P AR N,1d2LF!! 4& H FA:ROFP. 3 a K H �agF e PE 6 j - ms A.L R'4 PArmrNC" sr9N ¢ti j — Isrtw e" rErxrnE x wa PER Gmua Ex'rEN;rzov a3a [q]9 p I ­L smis:¢o c4mcuE e rw x 4 Fli41. TAIR — x121 -A I E Ts I FcLwEAitCNPL Ta eE RECR`,5rF4CiF0 5 FL L+G 5 i R' nun rs G � wl 3 coNCa�EiE�R j. x Ln+4.— 6 "' s ANOann ncA I L4NDETE IL: & GU C DETAIL: PrNEOFSPR1Al01 RAMP 4 GLALE SL6 il;i T l FOR FTTF ORAd7fNO PLAN ' ' SEF SHP,HT 5 �A8F6"FtP;A77OR1.4B,'TAAId, FLAN PAOFesszam w No. 2951] m m Ezp. 03/39/03 s 3?y CIVt� � ur' Ca1Sf(� REVtstorvs 101E4 DITE eE Nczs ogre BENCHMARK SCALE SPECIAL UISIRIC1 PLANS ='-�°° �nEC� _... __�.__ ePE OESCRIPi IO : CO BENCHMARK "OC o0]3 � PPEPARE3 11NRER THE SUPERVISION OF C i5EL0 ..ARE IN TOP E E 11NI " no DIE /j o+ oLArION R EL LANrN5EL � / oRTE c RANCHO SANTA EE Ea,cca NIP NAYNE Pasco R. cE a zes]r _.. RoAO E P 3 ?Y ns (� LENTEH.IN£ DATA LIT.£ EEARIM+ DELTA �IIS LEAGrH S LI 55 "a4E fig. 3' CENTEPLINC' L 26 f26 "W 63'P913" 34044' 33950' LENiERLIM1E 5[009 "W 293.39' LENIETAYI+2 F VPS >4A5 3$ @ 93 *9P 00 � 460 480 IAUTEPRPFYLE OP51GN 9MOWN RTGSN OEPILTI A VERTICAL ALIGNHENT OF 470 - ... WvE riw.wryry aOAO mIS a TGN- NT I6 srmw+ "1 REFEam'Lx: 470 PJRPaSE2 OM. o LI. rFH PARYIAL L(WSiRIKiION FaOM EXISFING GROUND - �� STATION 19* 37 ] P5 p N TP SHOW ULTIMAYEVEFYICAL ALIGNMENT 11 IN ME -I OF THE Flli111: ROADWAY EX�ENGION ' $ = EXISTYNG a' WATERLINE PER ' - a OMWO EXTENSION a'39 460 �W, z 460 i i LL �e 450:- _ _ zeI zsr OF aROPOSeo RoAmrar cunxuc - 450 z _ a Ian P 440 440" -- - _ L $Q 430- , -__ 430 h PROFILE. DOVE HOLLOW ROAD 42a 420 _ _ SCALP NOFZ I -GO /. vrRT. I "afi' 2 +00 3400 4 +00 5 +00 6 +00 7 +00 6 +00 9 +00 10+00 11+00 12 +00 13 +00 14 +00 g i �6 g �w IM v E I I sE'WEPoINE - GRAPHIC ."KALE i " =40' E OF ENCI I 5 e ,y 6O' rcE PRIV E ROAD 111 [ Y 1"A- TP � S y ,Silo Lii EXd9 LNG EOTGN NWL TgAIL E G NEC 1 3a 6 A9 FIP ]99 cF 11 G cs ,aa _ PF cr RECOUOS ` � `� 4 � „ 4 *� y, �, ti N �� F Ao ao szD cLL cove —1 o DOVE ea 4z o u e5z se HOLLOW ROAD / Br00 T � 4.00 r - CURBLINE 0„]Oi � E f5 ING 8' TEFLYNE PEP J - � • - �� A -, � � l 4 Ilf � - ,A QMWP E iENIICN p.i9 / / - zG P PAP FNE OZESIPA1 pRi / ar 4I 11 IALKZNG / r+ -°4s6 4P a PRESS ROL— Guar Tc E nrxY zc' nrcE E strEr: + q j r _ PEa c. 9,5' PltcF'E41rY lIM1'E �� �$EE u^'ItiEE'F'3I Oxs _ _...... �ECRFJ174ONALITRA® PLA� 9 ��. f A i4 x# RARCEL3 1 R ^E 6 �_.. cariN.TOLo-4v' -sis °, EasmE Ssa cocassP �zsr szz AS i Nh. PAROER. 'P � Y �I~ I� I vAeceL 3 PAS IIALE y> : PS/ TO OUTLET IMO PROPOSED G� 11-RAP E� 1 nassmArca �� N�'d °y � �F DETAIL. OVERSIDE DRAIN N�a ¢P NOT TO SCALE '..' 23VS9/ISJ 53I 7O9a, /�Fq 0� 3 ° c IS PLAN. DOVE HOLLOW ROAD y £ eBCFI442N2 ]1fl c 0 I"E E N £ pOPAStYBA aA P P� .39 ' CtNFMfiIEEMRPolLd.Y I( E Fk CAL3f oA,� RE DATA HE.NCHMaFlK SCALE SPECIAL oI3 "Y laical" APPROVZS CITY O(= ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEE3ARTMENT DRAWING NO es ""'. EPF ]Des ROVED .° GRADING PLAN FOR: �DCnnD : s rG - %WAyNE PASCS P 3��] c v' nPp vEo - OESCRIP T p015ER6ER NCHOE�I OTAOFE vEFl icnL A Aa - - PLANS PREPARED ENDER THE SUDPFRVS IDN OF RECOMMENDED O ^n� - DY R�Q 1 �� 98-272 � 1 RUN 677 —� IF IN ...—� .... -- ✓ R.c.E PPS7 /v11 ATEL1_I'! - - -- RDAD - SHEET 4 OF E ELEV I-PIG OA UM'. J11 G5 WORK PRDJEL'f NO GS- 7462' 02- J✓13X i^ _� 8^ w.:m 1 --� & G1E8 PVC ( - i 8 ^ + 380 . -. .. 8 & +ElE E Cl. 3 o A,7 ERr4eAL LC4rvE � 8 � N __3 _ _ _ 380 v pE re 35 @ zas c7 T l l d7A L2 / d6L g.$ Pd �� �� g � EWLStING SE 0 PVC SEWED @ 604% PER BW6 GB 321 370 - S 370 " m S v� - p ot CE' 3E0 _- -.- �.,..._. - v.' IS 36( EXIST WEP @ 050% PER Bwv cs 121 PRO IL, , FORTUNA RANCH ROAN (PRIVAP�� T LO 350 -_ -. ti �,�1 -.. -... scale v'i:.:i 35( flRAmuc scAL.E r'- C do eo 120 ff �E L g g� oR� w 8' D -• IS8 �` ° &g E K 1 R 4g aAT REVSSYONS -C APP 07-5 GATE REFERENCES HATE Y �b g � g � g� T g `g p g g U H R l� . i� ,g � g g � g H g g 1 ti h�a a ray _CONSTRUCTION GENTERLINE DATA [11 BEARING DELTA RADIUS LENGYP REA9AR �CI 25226'i 200.00' B9,a6' C STRUCTZINJ C/L { 88.51 59W 85949' LONBTRlICiION C/L Y � gti "I 8 w Eg ^g� w \ w I� a �o� PLAN ORTUNA RANCH ROAD fRTl A� SCALE' >!OR, -40 F-LINFT BEARIN(' LFAIMP REMARKS !.1 N17 3J'I 5920 37" SO (1500 -U) E2 N3J 5J 1'1-E 59,61' 3U ACP (f 00 -O) LC N96455z9 "W 12600 ]0 RLP (1500 -0) L4 Rr asd'o -ot SCALE o, } l � VAar(:5 te$ — AS m DETAIL: AC DIKE/CONC. ' � z�� cuaeLmE � o -�z rv�Ersaea CURB &GUTTER 7RANBITIDN NBT TO SCALE AC DIKE &CONCRETE CURB DATA giFS epoFESStBN IL2 l3EAR4NG DELTA RADIU5 LENGTH REMARKS _ 51 351$_ 2000 18 Oa' TYP E E' AC OEKE 21207 �' 23.BJ TPE EAC CARE 2 0748' 242.72 0 4B" JBB1114B" 18807'1759 5881159'E 859 9' TYPE 'E' AC DIKE 9PEC:IAL. LIISTRICT PLANS PaEPARm HtioE n AHPH( ALI - I Y OF ENCINI I AS INUII1111lNl:r LltClAH I MtN I IJHAWI NG NO EPR THE !E, SuPERVI SI ON of RECOMMEN()E4 APPf10VE0 ( 6AAUEN6 L N TOR: au0 R NE /, 6Y E �n�- BY DATF z -:)t '� ( TP 98-272 ADAMS file 6277 -G PASC - -� 3] o GATE 1L /�' E P 3 nau Pn T NO SHEET 5 OF 8 00'PTICAL CUPVE I It 410 . . .. . . _ B BF. _ _.o , ,410 _ ... . 2 200 vEPiICAL CUPVF � �f si aez ` dS s 400 - -. ._ : _ _. ... g �- ,� / .. 406 gl . ,�81 °wh tA`'% d s2 � - I I 250 VERTICAL CLWVE g g f f�^ X 390 _ _ pt u//a7 @d.65 ca - - - @e 2 390 P�sEP @ flRAmuc scAL.E r'- C do eo 120 ff �E L g g� oR� w 8' D -• IS8 �` ° &g E K 1 R 4g aAT REVSSYONS -C APP 07-5 GATE REFERENCES HATE Y �b g � g � g� T g `g p g g U H R l� . i� ,g � g g � g H g g 1 ti h�a a ray _CONSTRUCTION GENTERLINE DATA [11 BEARING DELTA RADIUS LENGYP REA9AR �CI 25226'i 200.00' B9,a6' C STRUCTZINJ C/L { 88.51 59W 85949' LONBTRlICiION C/L Y � gti "I 8 w Eg ^g� w \ w I� a �o� PLAN ORTUNA RANCH ROAD fRTl A� SCALE' >!OR, -40 F-LINFT BEARIN(' LFAIMP REMARKS !.1 N17 3J'I 5920 37" SO (1500 -U) E2 N3J 5J 1'1-E 59,61' 3U ACP (f 00 -O) LC N96455z9 "W 12600 ]0 RLP (1500 -0) L4 Rr asd'o -ot SCALE o, } l � VAar(:5 te$ — AS m DETAIL: AC DIKE/CONC. ' � z�� cuaeLmE � o -�z rv�Ersaea CURB &GUTTER 7RANBITIDN NBT TO SCALE AC DIKE &CONCRETE CURB DATA giFS epoFESStBN IL2 l3EAR4NG DELTA RADIU5 LENGTH REMARKS _ 51 351$_ 2000 18 Oa' TYP E E' AC OEKE 21207 �' 23.BJ TPE EAC CARE 2 0748' 242.72 0 4B" JBB1114B" 18807'1759 5881159'E 859 9' TYPE 'E' AC DIKE 9PEC:IAL. LIISTRICT PLANS PaEPARm HtioE n AHPH( ALI - I Y OF ENCINI I AS INUII1111lNl:r LltClAH I MtN I IJHAWI NG NO EPR THE !E, SuPERVI SI ON of RECOMMEN()E4 APPf10VE0 ( 6AAUEN6 L N TOR: au0 R NE /, 6Y E �n�- BY DATF z -:)t '� ( TP 98-272 ADAMS file 6277 -G PASC - -� 3] o GATE 1L /�' E P 3 nau Pn T NO SHEET 5 OF 8 oR� w 8' D -• IS8 �` ° &g E K 1 R 4g aAT REVSSYONS -C APP 07-5 GATE REFERENCES HATE Y �b g � g � g� T g `g p g g U H R l� . i� ,g � g g � g H g g 1 ti h�a a ray _CONSTRUCTION GENTERLINE DATA [11 BEARING DELTA RADIUS LENGYP REA9AR �CI 25226'i 200.00' B9,a6' C STRUCTZINJ C/L { 88.51 59W 85949' LONBTRlICiION C/L Y � gti "I 8 w Eg ^g� w \ w I� a �o� PLAN ORTUNA RANCH ROAD fRTl A� SCALE' >!OR, -40 F-LINFT BEARIN(' LFAIMP REMARKS !.1 N17 3J'I 5920 37" SO (1500 -U) E2 N3J 5J 1'1-E 59,61' 3U ACP (f 00 -O) LC N96455z9 "W 12600 ]0 RLP (1500 -0) L4 Rr asd'o -ot SCALE o, } l � VAar(:5 te$ — AS m DETAIL: AC DIKE/CONC. ' � z�� cuaeLmE � o -�z rv�Ersaea CURB &GUTTER 7RANBITIDN NBT TO SCALE AC DIKE &CONCRETE CURB DATA giFS epoFESStBN IL2 l3EAR4NG DELTA RADIU5 LENGTH REMARKS _ 51 351$_ 2000 18 Oa' TYP E E' AC OEKE 21207 �' 23.BJ TPE EAC CARE 2 0748' 242.72 0 4B" JBB1114B" 18807'1759 5881159'E 859 9' TYPE 'E' AC DIKE 9PEC:IAL. LIISTRICT PLANS PaEPARm HtioE n AHPH( ALI - I Y OF ENCINI I AS INUII1111lNl:r LltClAH I MtN I IJHAWI NG NO EPR THE !E, SuPERVI SI ON of RECOMMEN()E4 APPf10VE0 ( 6AAUEN6 L N TOR: au0 R NE /, 6Y E �n�- BY DATF z -:)t '� ( TP 98-272 ADAMS file 6277 -G PASC - -� 3] o GATE 1L /�' E P 3 nau Pn T NO SHEET 5 OF 8 &g E K 1 R 4g aAT REVSSYONS -C APP 07-5 GATE REFERENCES HATE Y �b g � g � g� T g `g p g g U H R l� . i� ,g � g g � g H g g 1 ti h�a a ray _CONSTRUCTION GENTERLINE DATA [11 BEARING DELTA RADIUS LENGYP REA9AR �CI 25226'i 200.00' B9,a6' C STRUCTZINJ C/L { 88.51 59W 85949' LONBTRlICiION C/L Y � gti "I 8 w Eg ^g� w \ w I� a �o� PLAN ORTUNA RANCH ROAD fRTl A� SCALE' >!OR, -40 F-LINFT BEARIN(' LFAIMP REMARKS !.1 N17 3J'I 5920 37" SO (1500 -U) E2 N3J 5J 1'1-E 59,61' 3U ACP (f 00 -O) LC N96455z9 "W 12600 ]0 RLP (1500 -0) L4 Rr asd'o -ot SCALE o, } l � VAar(:5 te$ — AS m DETAIL: AC DIKE/CONC. ' � z�� cuaeLmE � o -�z rv�Ersaea CURB &GUTTER 7RANBITIDN NBT TO SCALE AC DIKE &CONCRETE CURB DATA giFS epoFESStBN IL2 l3EAR4NG DELTA RADIU5 LENGTH REMARKS _ 51 351$_ 2000 18 Oa' TYP E E' AC OEKE 21207 �' 23.BJ TPE EAC CARE 2 0748' 242.72 0 4B" JBB1114B" 18807'1759 5881159'E 859 9' TYPE 'E' AC DIKE 9PEC:IAL. LIISTRICT PLANS PaEPARm HtioE n AHPH( ALI - I Y OF ENCINI I AS INUII1111lNl:r LltClAH I MtN I IJHAWI NG NO EPR THE !E, SuPERVI SI ON of RECOMMEN()E4 APPf10VE0 ( 6AAUEN6 L N TOR: au0 R NE /, 6Y E �n�- BY DATF z -:)t '� ( TP 98-272 ADAMS file 6277 -G PASC - -� 3] o GATE 1L /�' E P 3 nau Pn T NO SHEET 5 OF 8 I� a �o� PLAN ORTUNA RANCH ROAD fRTl A� SCALE' >!OR, -40 F-LINFT BEARIN(' LFAIMP REMARKS !.1 N17 3J'I 5920 37" SO (1500 -U) E2 N3J 5J 1'1-E 59,61' 3U ACP (f 00 -O) LC N96455z9 "W 12600 ]0 RLP (1500 -0) L4 Rr asd'o -ot SCALE o, } l � VAar(:5 te$ — AS m DETAIL: AC DIKE/CONC. ' � z�� cuaeLmE � o -�z rv�Ersaea CURB &GUTTER 7RANBITIDN NBT TO SCALE AC DIKE &CONCRETE CURB DATA giFS epoFESStBN IL2 l3EAR4NG DELTA RADIU5 LENGTH REMARKS _ 51 351$_ 2000 18 Oa' TYP E E' AC OEKE 21207 �' 23.BJ TPE EAC CARE 2 0748' 242.72 0 4B" JBB1114B" 18807'1759 5881159'E 859 9' TYPE 'E' AC DIKE 9PEC:IAL. LIISTRICT PLANS PaEPARm HtioE n AHPH( ALI - I Y OF ENCINI I AS INUII1111lNl:r LltClAH I MtN I IJHAWI NG NO EPR THE !E, SuPERVI SI ON of RECOMMEN()E4 APPf10VE0 ( 6AAUEN6 L N TOR: au0 R NE /, 6Y E �n�- BY DATF z -:)t '� ( TP 98-272 ADAMS file 6277 -G PASC - -� 3] o GATE 1L /�' E P 3 nau Pn T NO SHEET 5 OF 8 SCALE o, } l � VAar(:5 te$ — AS m DETAIL: AC DIKE/CONC. ' � z�� cuaeLmE � o -�z rv�Ersaea CURB &GUTTER 7RANBITIDN NBT TO SCALE AC DIKE &CONCRETE CURB DATA giFS epoFESStBN IL2 l3EAR4NG DELTA RADIU5 LENGTH REMARKS _ 51 351$_ 2000 18 Oa' TYP E E' AC OEKE 21207 �' 23.BJ TPE EAC CARE 2 0748' 242.72 0 4B" JBB1114B" 18807'1759 5881159'E 859 9' TYPE 'E' AC DIKE 9PEC:IAL. LIISTRICT PLANS PaEPARm HtioE n AHPH( ALI - I Y OF ENCINI I AS INUII1111lNl:r LltClAH I MtN I IJHAWI NG NO EPR THE !E, SuPERVI SI ON of RECOMMEN()E4 APPf10VE0 ( 6AAUEN6 L N TOR: au0 R NE /, 6Y E �n�- BY DATF z -:)t '� ( TP 98-272 ADAMS file 6277 -G PASC - -� 3] o GATE 1L /�' E P 3 nau Pn T NO SHEET 5 OF 8 1 m a a IT ..� e0 NxSgq PCa Owg 410- 4 /.. EXIStiNe IE 9 PVC s al �. y 45. PROFILE: FORTUNA RANCH A (pRjMAT ) SCALE HOR: 9 40 _.. ..... .... - 490 490... ? ; 0 U .2 VU PLAN. FORTUNA RANCH gQAD PRI�AT E ). scALe vER: � " -a' A t/ N ON aw �e `. pl CCN57RUC Io J eEN7ERLrNE DArA LWE BEARING DELTA RflDIIJ LENVrN REMflRKS 8B 5] 5 - 99p C- TRUCTYON CIL L SB 52 9 .11, .YO 05 51 CCNSiRU 1— C/L LZ 532 Q9 32 20 53 LDNSTRfICTION CIL L2 ] 3B 2�_P.�P E6 PB CPNSTRUCTION L /L, AC DIKE &CONCIZ CURB DATA �- .. LINE BEARING DELTA RADIUS LENGTH REMARKS L i s88 5 59 E 19B 52' Y E E" AC PINE 17 Al OSKE C7 _ �_ ~02 5B 9HH 1 5 B4'' Y PE E G DINE C2 54 256 9�!p 19999' PE R C E LOII(E C B. 0 ➢ CO' O 0G TRANS. C 2 2 P1 292.00 0 00" GN C &G TRANS. L5 G 238 aO0 233' LO C C66 TRANS. C6 0 616' „21200 285' CCNC L6G s. 3 32 09 3 E BV CONC C6 TRANS. L 532 09 32 W > A6' CPN C &G AIDS. 15 N32 093 E 2662' YPE E' AC 01 E 6 532 b9 32' _ E 999 66' TYPE ' C PIKE L N32 32 E �� X10' E E' IP DIKE " C �] 3155' —o 5980' E "E' Al OME CB 23 2 _ ]00 00 40.84 ' T PE E' C DIKE Lri � �ro�M DzAIN DArA rfleLE �INE BEARING LENGhi REANflRKS �� 5fi 22 9 9 ]5 98 RCP L 2 NSG 22 9 W 2 0 8 RC 3 N56 22 9 025 ]8 RCP IY r a U T -NA GRADING I Y PERwz ou ; Nr sAN olEe F N R.— EN, DF PUBLIC moRIC I UH ] PPRD LTJ DOUGLAS M SSBELL COUN Y ENGINEER Y t R wlrn3 couN v ,rJRlsuzcrmN r 4,I opOF A55Z N : � F' PgsoFc 3 z Mo. 29577 m E p 03/37/07 Xr %? CNIL 4>F GF No e� e,.P +. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENNEI] APP NEC "" DA E / -I,U B'! ,u� ,_, B u, °l. ,� ,�i�J TP _ 98-272 ADAMS RUN 627i -G PLANS AINE P Eco .— R P E NG.2 oATe. �_ E P. �s9 0.3 woarc PROJECT N9. SHEET 6 OF E rI iNBI rbawr FPNAi PP'6 4 f - 450' _ _. ... _ r FS 0 AWING ewc 62a2 G 6 L 13390. rc rs ExrsrrlvG RDADWAr 950 VERYYCAL CIAIVE 900 VERTICN_ LIIRVF ' ' �n _ _. 440 .., .... 440 2 FlI - z FI 2J 3b @ !It' C q � E 440 - N 4.30 . Lad g . R�», llC M � s34% "0 A, E g�R " -. " 42fD ? ; 0 U .2 VU PLAN. FORTUNA RANCH gQAD PRI�AT E ). scALe vER: � " -a' A t/ N ON aw �e `. pl CCN57RUC Io J eEN7ERLrNE DArA LWE BEARING DELTA RflDIIJ LENVrN REMflRKS 8B 5] 5 - 99p C- TRUCTYON CIL L SB 52 9 .11, .YO 05 51 CCNSiRU 1— C/L LZ 532 Q9 32 20 53 LDNSTRfICTION CIL L2 ] 3B 2�_P.�P E6 PB CPNSTRUCTION L /L, AC DIKE &CONCIZ CURB DATA �- .. LINE BEARING DELTA RADIUS LENGTH REMARKS L i s88 5 59 E 19B 52' Y E E" AC PINE 17 Al OSKE C7 _ �_ ~02 5B 9HH 1 5 B4'' Y PE E G DINE C2 54 256 9�!p 19999' PE R C E LOII(E C B. 0 ➢ CO' O 0G TRANS. C 2 2 P1 292.00 0 00" GN C &G TRANS. L5 G 238 aO0 233' LO C C66 TRANS. C6 0 616' „21200 285' CCNC L6G s. 3 32 09 3 E BV CONC C6 TRANS. L 532 09 32 W > A6' CPN C &G AIDS. 15 N32 093 E 2662' YPE E' AC 01 E 6 532 b9 32' _ E 999 66' TYPE ' C PIKE L N32 32 E �� X10' E E' IP DIKE " C �] 3155' —o 5980' E "E' Al OME CB 23 2 _ ]00 00 40.84 ' T PE E' C DIKE Lri � �ro�M DzAIN DArA rfleLE �INE BEARING LENGhi REANflRKS �� 5fi 22 9 9 ]5 98 RCP L 2 NSG 22 9 W 2 0 8 RC 3 N56 22 9 025 ]8 RCP IY r a U T -NA GRADING I Y PERwz ou ; Nr sAN olEe F N R.— EN, DF PUBLIC moRIC I UH ] PPRD LTJ DOUGLAS M SSBELL COUN Y ENGINEER Y t R wlrn3 couN v ,rJRlsuzcrmN r 4,I opOF A55Z N : � F' PgsoFc 3 z Mo. 29577 m E p 03/37/07 Xr %? CNIL 4>F GF No e� e,.P +. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENNEI] APP NEC "" DA E / -I,U B'! ,u� ,_, B u, °l. ,� ,�i�J TP _ 98-272 ADAMS RUN 627i -G PLANS AINE P Eco .— R P E NG.2 oATe. �_ E P. �s9 0.3 woarc PROJECT N9. SHEET 6 OF E IY r a U T -NA GRADING I Y PERwz ou ; Nr sAN olEe F N R.— EN, DF PUBLIC moRIC I UH ] PPRD LTJ DOUGLAS M SSBELL COUN Y ENGINEER Y t R wlrn3 couN v ,rJRlsuzcrmN r 4,I opOF A55Z N : � F' PgsoFc 3 z Mo. 29577 m E p 03/37/07 Xr %? CNIL 4>F GF No e� e,.P +. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENNEI] APP NEC "" DA E / -I,U B'! ,u� ,_, B u, °l. ,� ,�i�J TP _ 98-272 ADAMS RUN 627i -G PLANS AINE P Eco .— R P E NG.2 oATe. �_ E P. �s9 0.3 woarc PROJECT N9. SHEET 6 OF E 4,I opOF A55Z N : � F' PgsoFc 3 z Mo. 29577 m E p 03/37/07 Xr %? CNIL 4>F GF No e� e,.P +. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENNEI] APP NEC "" DA E / -I,U B'! ,u� ,_, B u, °l. ,� ,�i�J TP _ 98-272 ADAMS RUN 627i -G PLANS AINE P Eco .— R P E NG.2 oATe. �_ E P. �s9 0.3 woarc PROJECT N9. SHEET 6 OF E i I EXISrING RECREATPONAL IL= — Il - GrY � IL /CENT /F /(AT /QV(2J �� /c uu a-e lYz 11 E Is a 9L c 6 IL ITE c r c IP N 53 OC l-, E f F. P . or / F8R/9 /r/EAT %lL USRu O] _11, �„ / (3" K 3' fSPON4le G!N/rE SY^OHO SJ 1124"0-11, °� aewaA�i>FO <rnv/rres' (m /OA,a OWNEWN /fESY Ho!< r� A / //X',�0.5'/5HJ Uu�'ra,PSavrrE 0UAC 5 / /LV<aECee4ncwa[ ® naazeEe (na- .aasJ(/ -am- Gas -/araJ ae aF/a.oveo Fnu/uq/r -vr. cocoz. seaan/ �.us /nKe ¢+.rest /NC w rre c�vruzr scs/crresceu °�+�srrce, oveQOa /rvanc �aanvo RF lY .CF/(S rO Pgrra S/L� /V 1N ,59nY Po%/rJON. -- - -.... q E,L(/ArE S /4N//6E FRV'✓N LNk �[G"Fk'� /G Y Eryaswr�FS ,"/ti'juaN aFrr:.e I� j -_. FORTUNA -- RANCH 77 -. eas J ➢0 Rq L .111R POST'. 0 0 TO Q S �N \ 9 CAL J mr OR INS ESE TEGHE 5 TO ANEF E GS IN m4 I Iq ON *SSE NOTE6 8FIDYl A E 90I �E N � � IL STEG LE TYPICAL SECTIOiV Ca -G aiwI RECREATION TRAIL J ROAD 0 ,/- E%1.1 —T—L TRAIL NOT TE cAE PER HAP Nv 1320a I � 2 r�o4M S RU�u T--.T_ -' "^'B - 6/dfJIVI5Y0N 6IXINEARY 97' ALTUM RASEH RoA61 " ]2+4565 ]500 R E S M INE� E E E CE TEA INTERSEC I ]O' - . � II R 1 GNAT A I a NA_ CONGO E TRAIL CROSETNG - �NO I ERNE E 0 oR I RESS 6 c HESS 20 WIDE RECRE _NAL RAIL S G 0� RO E rRal� I EA�ENC-I PEA FINAL PARCEL NAP M � U4� rH 6 93 INSTALL_ R BAR GATT TNO OR TRA SOIL —' IL SURFACE TYPICAL SECTION I-I -I% RECREATION/ TRAIL NOT —. TO SC ___ sFNAs INSTALL ALE na- EAR — uvsLOPE l �q/ G swAC .0 i � e / � �/L S'LFE _.... `"p: �= �E✓EkY z -3( / l J TRAIT. TREAT / I G -SIX 7G 6 -y ATEI8 R L X55 r{9N2//l 2C 1 6905 Ngt/ //// � / /�� 9mE ONO SLYC f0NglT /qNS MAY 3 piEp BR hT` 5 PLFE5��P Anerb FAR ro �y/I3 apa �0* GA.- 6 Al ENE °Trssma -0oe 'Ile y. =' � WI✓ATE 3 BAR DETAIL yrorY � Oy�`�? Nor TfS "scAtF ^e / _ - / a T — is 3� Tp GG FORREON RANCH AoA0 I m soesrvasrTN e6uimARv IQI AT a Z �V—�� ���� - - -� � sU9orvlsmA 60uNOARV F OFESSIONq y3 a Elie. 03/39/03 a S? Clvl� 3 /a" Tril. L>711TIN000S RE'TENTIGNMOI L13, z CU. F N TRAIL TF. 6o1NACTE➢ co.L�, _ snu 6A AnazEE IL aL A..9 2 x 6 R"""' NCOO -. 2 ROWS, MTATFRET WATER BAR CROSS SECTION NOT TO ScALE RECREATION TRAIL (VOTES W ME"HI E E C T S IT5S TO Q E S r.: PE r s .SDI G CONPOSE,: GRANITE PITR0 9 E C IN G SLOPE IM 2 1 1111-M FI L SLOPE !A 2' EH I G O IL L E U 2 CPOS IA 9 6E % O 'ER i ClEA RAIL RAIIF 11 11 11AIL SE 1AINrAINED AT ILL TEEINfE, O. ROIIJ i A p OEP C 0 E. E THE M. NIMUF SPACING SHALL aE 0 R sAa G- I s 11 ). Tr I - H : LAH I 9 J EI 66" >_ TO 3E rNA FROM, C S EC G 5. FV I Aa E' F OM "c INTEH T ONA'.. CORPORATION JO BOtl OIFFORU aLVO. P -0, 90H 9 EARLY RR4NLR, SC 29916 -0099 (IIE) 111 -9595 !9001 649 -79%4 aLL YON T X'I i0 9E PREPARED ON PRE651IRE 6EN8'ITIVE EECALS US IONO liII "' II'VE LY"NTUAY SCHOOL5ooK E1'SER STljgy O IREIN °A iVRFOOSNksN Nn R PPREL"ITOFV EECALS HALL e '�roN�j vP o E I onrE Hers nTe �1ENCI -IMFlPK �+�� c' ..._ "° nxL PLAN roR. --- -°�°^°-" OESCPI iI0 C BENCHMARk "OL 0076" _ PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVIWSION OF RECOMMEN' /D NPP EO ,� �( j ''TR ° 627 G �- � 1SEI EO 60UARE YN TOP Ho�+iSOUeL 5a' 1 >-�� Tn'n/ n �` 6 9� �� f AMpI f OF' IF.AOWALL � A9/li"L`/ � � ®�M LOCATIO : LOPNER EL CAMINO DEL N / /G /l :Po U iF � >� b a �,. - PM 9(j Q 272 ES RU1V �9 o E 6 RANCHO sAnTA rE wd E afgsc6 — P t E N 39577 A'YE, _2 N Oi ATE SHEET I OF 8 ve Tsca / E P 3 q3 OR PPO CY NO -� - rl Fv ��9.476 DATUM: U6C6G5 E 786 2 BAGS HIGH � AI Ell In cT IGH _._ T LFcFrm HYCFlO�EO SLOPE FHOTECTxCN SAA41 /GRAVEL BAGS aaooaoaa B EROSION OONIROL I {// I I. MA CASE EMERGENCY WORK IS REQUIRED CONTACT CONSTRUCTION MANAGER JOHN SSLVERW000 T BIB) 693 2990 IPMENT A 0 WOPFCRS FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE Ai ALL IMES DURIN AS G HE RAINY SEON ALL O NECESSPRY MATERIALS SHALL BE STOCKPILED ON SITE A 0 a ""� sp �O� ENIENT LOCAn ONS TO FACII xTATE . coNSTRUCI TEMPORARY DEVICES WHEN RAIN IS IMMINEREENY ION OF O O 0 3. DEVICES SHOWN ON PLANS SIHLL N BE OVER OR MODIFIED T M � WITHOUT THE PPROVAL OF E ENGINEERING INSPECTOR. 4, E CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE L EROS SOON CONTROL DEVICES G YO WORKING ORDER O THE SATISFACTION THE CITY ENGINEER AFTER EACH RUN OFF P ODUCING RAINFALL, S'. E CONTRACTOR S INSTALL AODITIBM AL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS BE REOVIRED BY SHE CITV ENGINEER DUE TO 9 UNCOMPMAY EO GRADING OPERATION OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES Op O 00`5'0 000 / I W .. RISE. 8 006aoauonOUO 0 0p G. E CEO R CTOI SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND snnu TAKE a� - REASS ME IMPOUNIEOSWA TERSE CREATEUALHAZARDOUS CONDITOION, a p - - -- — z Au EPGSxON coNTROL MEasuRES PROVxGEO PER rHE APPROVE6 _- a a a U D 0 _... 0 a. - -0 0 . 0 -� GRAOINC PLAN SHALL BE IN.RPOPAI ED HEREON. a d a a o a u a o a P. GRADED AREAS AROUND THE PROJECT PERIMETER MUST DRAIN AWAY FROM THE FACE OF SLOPE AT THE CONCLUSION OF EACH WORK DAY. A. ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHOWN SHALL BE IN PLACE H .END OF EACH ORKING DAC W EN THE FIVE I5) DAY RPfN PR BABILITY RE CASK EXCEEDS 0 TY PERCENT (4N%). SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE EMOVED AFTER EACH AINFALL. 90. SHOULD GEHMI NATION OF HYDROSEEDED SLOPES IL TO PROVme EFFECTIVE COVEPA7N DF GRADED SLOPES (90% COVERPBE) PRIOR 0 (NOVEMBER 95. E SLOPES SHALL BE STAB YL YZED WITH P NC HEO STRAW INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 35 023 F CAE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ANONOOK OF THE STATE (09 ph OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION. 4< as Fc � z ]] ]/a3 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 " =50yy �'l 0 50 900 950 3F �ivaU EENCI -(MARK SCALE SPECTAL DISTRICT" APPROVALS CITY OF F.NCINITAS ENGINEERING OEPARTMEN DRAWING N0. RE RFNCes °°~PF " w.P VYS�oNS Dvsn e ,m ._.,.m_ _ T1177P, T IO . CO. BENCHMAR( "DC 00>3 PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED // AP?, OVEDAA,II m� EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR: "5 L fSELEO GOU ARE 1N TOP 5o DATA Ems'..... BV:a� —... By /EM) P1 vUgLT! JW �i °�® 7'��''S� ADAMS �AH C'l7""l „_/"�2� OF EAOWALL / ® C- 7' GG ® CS /'� CV iJ G / l7 LOCATION. S CORNER EL CAMINO DEL - / L c;2�J No E B RaNLno SANTA rE - R.c.e D 95n..- DATE: ,2,lf/t�.l D I I, P -var ROAD EATTC >L 1n NE PASCo �I -- ELEV 999. 476 DATUM'. USC6GS EXP 3 39 R3 WDPK PROJECT NU. SHEET 8 OF B 2 BAGS HIGH \ AT OUTLET .°'_— ____---- __. —_s:4 -gip ---- -- - -- -,..p I I I 2 BAGS HIGH I AT OUTLET I I l I - -2 BAGS HIGH /i AT OUTLET ol I I 0 00 " °0060 •I r 1 I 0000 000000 .. o° I ' PpOF ESSlp 4 I LEGEND oo ®� YGN05fL DFE PPOrEfrrgy �C� s wi I vE o ss o EROSION CONTROL I. C G NC P H 000 IS !N CB 0 ' NICOB, EI O CONTACt GO CH'[ON 2990 2, FOVIPMENT AND VON CRB FOR E F GE B A HF M Of VIII BLE L 'f ES DU RI E R S Y SE 50 L ECESS R 'E I LS BE S OC PSLCO 9 E f LONVE HEN LOC I) 5 t0 CI I A F ID C N I' U T.MPON ....... E RAI IN 1 I 9 DEVICES 5 ILA 9 LL OT B MOVED 0 MUR I WIiHOI F PP 0 0 E ENGINEERING S 1'G B 0 R C "UFl S A L RE ERO ION CANTED RE V11.11 NCAONS U EA EACH RUNE OFF PROO.CI G I F E THE CS F C6Nt E. E. TIE CONTRACTOR 5:All I ADDITIONAL E D:TO NTH UNIOMPLETED GRACIIN OPCHIIION OR ONFOREBEFNI CIE( DUTANLE, R ...... MAY RISE. 6 E G N RAC OR IL RESPO SLH E NO SHALL TAPE uCES Fl P EAU 'IO IN PREVENT PIBI IL RRESFA TO EA E IMPOU ERS CREATE H Z D 5 DI:IO AL' CO T D ME SU I. Fl O SOE R E tPl "O G US NC l ALL HE I G RATE - 0 B GRACED ISI E OF EACNR ORKA AI DAY. J. T L LNU U� EACNE WOHrcYNB OAYEwH INff' VE 11 PROBABILITY FORECAST E%CELDI ORT PE IIIE r (12 CI.- ND OTHER DEBRIS GRILL BE REMOVED AF FR EACH I L I0. 111ECOIVERMOV,NAGE OF GHDAREIESL OP E5 AR COVERAGEjRRCIIOP l'0 NOVEMBER I$ THE I6.ORES SHALL BE SIANBILIIEII WITII PUNCHED ST RAB INNST ALL ED IN ACCORDANCE 11. IEOIION 5,5 02' OF CALIFORNIANDEFDARTMENEEOF CONIERVAHIIONBDOK E STATE OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN DRAWING �ND,rz. oNTRD1'PM9 —272 ADAMS RUN � 6277--G F3� 4ECT N __ __ ., ®. —..— SHEET 5 01" T PE ABfiF' ` v w Y BENCHMARK SCALE SPECIAL DISTRICT APPROVALS DESCRIPtION. C0: IN "OC-OD73 PLANSARREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION DO RECOMMENDED APPRDVED OF FELEO sDUARE IN TOP 'ION: eoaso "...`._so 0 Dare: Ir 9 c° Bv: ___ er:_ DEL LOC SW CORNER EL CAMINO SANTA E 6 RANCHO SANTA FE "' —' _ R.C.E. NO, DATE DATE: Rf]R OAD ane ac—_ warNE Plscn. _ up.. =2A=Qa ELEV119.n /(i DATUM'. uSC6G5 LEGEND oo ®� YGN05fL DFE PPOrEfrrgy �C� s wi I vE o ss o EROSION CONTROL I. C G NC P H 000 IS !N CB 0 ' NICOB, EI O CONTACt GO CH'[ON 2990 2, FOVIPMENT AND VON CRB FOR E F GE B A HF M Of VIII BLE L 'f ES DU RI E R S Y SE 50 L ECESS R 'E I LS BE S OC PSLCO 9 E f LONVE HEN LOC I) 5 t0 CI I A F ID C N I' U T.MPON ....... E RAI IN 1 I 9 DEVICES 5 ILA 9 LL OT B MOVED 0 MUR I WIiHOI F PP 0 0 E ENGINEERING S 1'G B 0 R C "UFl S A L RE ERO ION CANTED RE V11.11 NCAONS U EA EACH RUNE OFF PROO.CI G I F E THE CS F C6Nt E. E. TIE CONTRACTOR 5:All I ADDITIONAL E D:TO NTH UNIOMPLETED GRACIIN OPCHIIION OR ONFOREBEFNI CIE( DUTANLE, R ...... MAY RISE. 6 E G N RAC OR IL RESPO SLH E NO SHALL TAPE uCES Fl P EAU 'IO IN PREVENT PIBI IL RRESFA TO EA E IMPOU ERS CREATE H Z D 5 DI:IO AL' CO T D ME SU I. Fl O SOE R E tPl "O G US NC l ALL HE I G RATE - 0 B GRACED ISI E OF EACNR ORKA AI DAY. J. T L LNU U� EACNE WOHrcYNB OAYEwH INff' VE 11 PROBABILITY FORECAST E%CELDI ORT PE IIIE r (12 CI.- ND OTHER DEBRIS GRILL BE REMOVED AF FR EACH I L I0. 111ECOIVERMOV,NAGE OF GHDAREIESL OP E5 AR COVERAGEjRRCIIOP l'0 NOVEMBER I$ THE I6.ORES SHALL BE SIANBILIIEII WITII PUNCHED ST RAB INNST ALL ED IN ACCORDANCE 11. IEOIION 5,5 02' OF CALIFORNIANDEFDARTMENEEOF CONIERVAHIIONBDOK E STATE OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN DRAWING �ND,rz. oNTRD1'PM9 —272 ADAMS RUN � 6277--G F3� 4ECT N __ __ ., ®. —..— SHEET 5 01" T PE ABfiF' I OR40/NO NOTFS NOTIFICATIONS 1. ALL WON SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS, THE STANDAGO SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS 1. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF UNCERGROUNC UTILITY PI PAS AND STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTAINED BY CONSTRUCTION, THE DESIGN CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS Al. THE SAN DIEGO AREA REGIDNAL SEARCH OF AVAILABLE RECORDS. TO THE BEST OF OUR NOWLEUGE HERE E NO E%ISTI NG UTILITIES EXCEPT AS SHOWN STANDARD ORAW THIS . ANY CHANGES OR REVISIONS THEREFROM SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TD ANY ON THESE PLANS, HOWEVER: ARGUE FOR INSPECTION. ... THE SOILS REPORT TITLED ' PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY EASURE$ 0 PROTECT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES INVE�STIGATION PPOPOSEO 4 UNIT RANCHO FpRTUNA DEV., AL IIS MAIN IFOPNI A, PREPARED BY: CONSTRUCTION LOCATED AT THE ORK SITE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE FOLLOWING OHNEP'S OF SAID TESTING 6 ENGINEERING, INC., DATED: 9- 16 -90, ANI UPDATE REPORT FOR SAME DATED 9 -7 -2000 SHALL BE CONSIOEPED UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES PRIOR TO ANY E.CAAVATION. FOR ERIE ICA TI DN AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES D NOTIFICATION OF S A PART OF THIS GOADING PLAN. ALL GRADING SHALL BE .ONE IN ACCORDANCE ITN THE RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENCEMENT OF WORK: A. SEWERS - CSO (760) 633 -2770 SPECIFICATIONS CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT. 3. D ROYAL OF THIS PLAN DUES NOT CDNSTITUTE APPROVAL DF B. GAS S ELECTRIC -SDGGE (800) 422 -4133 SIZES. LOCATION AND TYPE OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES, NOR OF IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN STREET RIGHT -OF -NAYS. SEPARATE L. WATER - UNIT (760)753 -6466 PPROVALS AND PERMITS OP THE SHALL BE AECAIREO IN CONJUNCTION WITH IMPROVEMENT PLANS. D. TELEPHONE - PAC -BELL MD.) 489 -3441 4, RITTEN FERMI551ON SHALL BE OBTAINED FOR ANY OFF -SITE E. CABLE TV - (0001 422 -4133 GRACING. I UNOERGRDUNU SERVICE ALERT -(BD01 422 -4133 h. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAX' ECESSARY PRECAUTIONS REQUIRED TO PROTECT AGJACENT PROPERTIES DURING GRADING OPERATIONS, NYTHING DAMAGED OR DESTROYED SHALL BE REPLACED OR G. CONTRACTOR SHALL OTIFY THE CY ENGINEER'S OFFICE AS POURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. REPAIRED TO CONDITION EXISTING PRIOR TO GRADING. HONE: (760) 633 -2770. G. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE THAT ANY MONUMENT OR 3, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE 24 HOURS NOTICE ON CALLS OR INSPECTION. PHONE (760) 633 -2770. HOOK PERFORMEU BENCH MARK WHICH IS DISTURBED OR DESTROYED SHALL BE AE- ESTABLISHED REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER ITHOUT BENEFIT OF INSPECTS UN WILL BE SUBJECT 0 REJECTION D REMOVAL. OR ANDAREPLACED OR. DESIGN-, 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN. CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES INCLUDING SHORING AND SHALL BE SOILS ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE RESPONSIBLE FOR EONEORMI NG TO ALL LOCAL. STATE AND FEOEPAL SAFETY A 0 HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS AND 1, RODNEY D. SALLARO, REGI BTERED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINSEA IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. PRINCIPALLY DOING BUSINESS IN THE FI.TO OF PPLIED SOIL REGULATIONS, MECHANICS. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SAMPLING AGO STUDY OF THE SOIL CONDITIONS PREVALENT WITHIN THIS SITE HAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY 0. GRADING A" I lIPMEAT OPERATING WITHIN DNE -HALF 11/2) MILE OF A STRUCTURE FUR HUMAN OCCUPANCY SHALL NDT BE DIRECTION BETWEEN THE DATES 07 -27 -98 AND 09- 1fi -9B. ONE COMPLETE COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT COMPILED FROM THIS STUDY, WITH MY EONDUCTED BETWEEN THE DURS OF 5:30 P.M. AND 7:30 A.M. OR ON SATURDAYS. SUNDAYS AND CITY RECOGNIZED HOLIDAYS. RECOMMENDATIONS, HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER, ALONG WITH UPDATE LE I TER ED (N /Y)THATSTHERMORE. I D. NO GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL COMMENCE UNTIL A PERSUADING ASAT RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED IN THE SOILS REIGHT FOR THIS PROJECT HAVE PEE TI NG HAS BEEN HELD DIGITE ITT THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE ENGINEER BEEN INCORPORATED IN THE GRADING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. GRADING CONiRADIUS ANDOPEOMITTEE. IHEEPREGRADE WITH LEAST 0 OURS IN EXISTING ING CONTOURS -- ADVANCEEBYCCALLINGG 760)T 633 -2770? WT 10. PAI OR TO HAULING DIRT DR CDNSTRUCTIDN MATERIALS TO ANY PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SITE WITHIN THIS PROJECT THE.,,, BEVELOPEP SHALL SUBMIT 0 AND RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE CI T'! ENGINEER FDA THE PROPOSES HAUL ROUTE. HE DEVELOPER ,�frer,.�� W� \� SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS THE SIGNED: ' OPERA TIDNNEEl MAY IMPOSE WITH REGARDS TO THE HAULING GE N0. 2173 FAR BmOye ' OF THE AK R THE GRADING 1]. UPON FINAL COMPLETION 0 E WO UNOE PERMIT BVT PRIOR TO FINAL GRADING APPROVAL ANO /OR FINAL M �y MYNL EXP. PATE: JVwE 30. 20 ' i Di GpAP RELEASE Of SECURITY, AS- GRADEB DERT IERMITI DN SHALL BE PROVIDED STATING: THE GRADING UNDER PERMIT N0. 6277 -G DECLARATIONOFRESPONB/SIECHARGE HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN OR AS SHOWN ON I HEREBY DECLARE THAT I AM THE ENGINEER OF WDRE FOR THIS PROJECT. THAT I HAVE EXERCISED PESPONSI BLE CHARGE OVER HE DESIGN OF THE THE ATTACHED AS- GRADED PLAN ", THIS STATEMENT SHALL BE ALLOWED BY IHE DATE AND SIGNATURE OF THE CIVIL ENGINEER WHO CERTIFIES SUCH GRADING OPEPATION. PROJECp AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6703 OF HBUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE. ND THAT HE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS. 12. ALL GRAOI NG SHALL BE OBSERVED AND TESTED BY A OUALIFIEO SOILS ENGINEER OR UNDER MIS DIRECTION. HE SMALL OBSERVE I UNDERSTAND THAT HE CHECK OF PROJECT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS BT THE CITY OF ENCINITAS IS CONFINED TO A REVIEW ONLY AND DOES NOT RELIEVE ME, S ENGINEER OF WORN, DF MY AESPONSIBILETIES FOR PROJECT AND EST THE EXCAVATION PLACEMENT D COMPACTION OF ILLS AN BACKFILLS AND COMPACTION OF TRENCHES E SHALL ACQUIRED AND WILL DETERMINE THE DESIGN-, SUBMIT SOILS REPORTS AS - SUITABILITY OF ANY FILL MATERIAL. UP AN CDMPLETIDN OF pOFESST F O'V4 GRADING OPERATIONS HE SHALL STATE THAT OBSERVATIONS AND TESTS WERE MADE HIM DR UNDER HIS SUPERVISION AND THAT So IN HIS OPINION. LL EMBANKMENTS AND EXCAVATIONS WERE ALL CONSTPUCTED IN ACCOADANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING y ti dp xP N0. 29577' S LANS AND THAT ALL EMBANKMENTS AND EXCAVATIONS FOR THEIR INTENDED USE, ¢ Exp. 03/31/03 v ARE SUITABLE 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPERLY GRADE ALL EXCAVATED POSITIVE DRAAGE AND PREVENT PDNOING SURFACES TO PROVILL IN 8Y:- {JP2�a OATEN 7. JG {3 Yt NN '�q CIYIL A CONTROL 11AT..HE ADJOINING PROPERTIESRON TOWFI ER ISHED -ORKDDN THE R. A.C.E. 577 ELK CpLiF SITE AND SHALL TAKE REMEDIAL MEASURES TD PREVENT EROSION OFIFRESHLY GRADED AREAS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS PERMANENT PROPOSED 4" AC PAVEMENT OVER 6" GAGE 54, 743 SF ONNSTALLEOAND EROSION CONTROL .MEASURES AVE BEEN OWNERS CERTFCATE: 14. ALL AREAS TO BE FILLED SHALL BE PREPARED TO BE FILLED AND FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE ITH STANDARD SAECI FICATI UNS. ALL VEGETABLE MATTER AND OBJECTIONABLE I ERESY CERTIFY THAT A REGISTERED SOILS ENGINEER DR GEOLOGIST AS BEEN OR AN E DETAINED TO SUPERVISE TERIAL SMALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR FROM THE SURFACE UPON WHICH THE FILL IS TO BE PLACED. LOOSE FILL OVER ALL GRADING ALT IV TY AND ADVISE ON THE COMPACTION D ABILITY tE. AND ALLUVIAL SOILS SHALL BE REMOVED TO SUITABLE ISM NATURAL GROUND. THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO EXISTING FENCE REMOVAL 6 RELOCATION - - - -. U. �:? -- 450 LF A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES AND THEN CA ACT TO A MINIMUM OF 90 PERCENT. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO V# Neu PLACE. SPREAD. WATER AND COMPACT E FILL IN STRICT COPDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. RrlN L, _ Q 4'6Y1oevT :BENINC qc o 15. CUT ANN FILL SLOPES SMALL BE CUT AND TRIMMED TO FINISH p �A: ��N 9 C9cipozUi? coRVa< oN GRADE TO PRODUCE SMOOTH SURFACED AND UNIFORM CROSS SECTIONS. HE SLOPES OF EXCAVATIONS AND EMBANKMENTS -49N ME4o1 ('q 7 &1y9 CBs'e/ 413- zs9ogry SHALL BE SHAD. PLANTED AND TRIMMED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OF WORK AND LEFT IN NEAT AND ORDERLY INm OFSHlRm CONOIT ION. ALL STONES. ROOTS AND OTHER WASTE MATTED SHEET 1 TITLE SHEET .POSED OR EXCAVATION OR EMBANKMENT SLOPES WHICH APE LIABLE TO BECOME LDUSENED SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED SHEET 2 TITLING PLAN SHEET 3 GRADING PLAN KIIAY ABACI F. THE TDE AND TOO OF ALL SLOPES SHALL BE RD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GRADING ORDINANCE. SHEET SHEET 4 GRATING PLAN (DOVE HOLLOW ROAD) SHEET 5 TRAIL PLAN 16. LC TREES. BLUSH. GRABS AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE COLLECTED PILED TR OTH RWI BE DISPOSE OF OFF SHEET 6 PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (FORTUNA RANCH ROAGI SHEET 7 PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (FORTUNA RANCH POAD1 NE SITE By THE CONTRACTOR SO AS TO LEAVE THE AREAS HAT HAVE BEEN CLEARED WITH A NEAT ND FINISHED APPEARANCE SHEET B EROSION CONTROL PLAN FREE FROM UNSIGHTLY DEBRIS. PPROVAI OF LOCATION OF DEBRIS FILL SHALL BE SECURED FROM THE SOILS ENGINEER AND CITY ENGI WEEP PRIOR TO THE DISPOSAL DF SUCH MATERIAL, N01 FROM THE SWRCB SHOWING THE PERMIT NUMBER FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY pF ENCINITAS WHEN RECEIVED. LANDSCAPING 1 ALL SLOPE 6PPRCVEG 11 THEOCITY ENGINE ERR. INLAND SHALLE CONFORM TO THE CITY OP ENGI NITAS GRADING ORDINANCE AD. ALL ADOPTED LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION STANDARDS. FINISH GRADING AND PLANTING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED ON ALL SLOPES PRIOR 0 OCTOBER 1 OP IMtEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF 4NY SLOPES SP OEN BETWEEN OCTOBER ] A ND APRIL 15. APP VE�ff� APPROVED By BV:_ DATE: n -; /'AND DATE: _ BENCHMARK SCALE :SCRIPTION: CO. BENCHMAPH "OC- 0073" CHISELED SQUARE IN TOP OF HEAOHALL 1 40 11ANAT )CATION: SW CORNER EL CAMINO DEL NOTE 6 RANCHO SANTA HE VERTICAL A .EX 11-IS DATUM: USCSGS GENERAL MIPROVEMENT NOTES WORKTOSEDONE 1 ENEMPTiNG SERYICEOTAEPNE6ARTNEMT THE CITYNOF ENCINITAiI& S. D. P.S. D. = SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD ORAXINGS STREET RIGHT -W-XAY. ITEM S.O.R.S.D.# SYMBOL QUANTITY 2 THE STRUCTURAL SECTION SMLLS6APPROVEOOADANCE IN CITY O. NOTICE OF APPADVAL FOR TPA 98 -272. AM THE STIMANW FAA BE STAGGERED SO THAT THERE IS ONE (11 SI SN P MAXIMUM OF 75 FEET PRIVATE STREETS. ON ALTERNATING SIDES OF THE ACCESS ROADIE) SIG S SHALISE PLAINLY VISIBLE FROM ANY LOCATION UN AN ACCESS ROAD(S). SIGNS SHALL BE W ENCINITAS TA NMp 9BY iTHHEE CITY _A SHALL BE REOUIRED MUCH TO PROJECT BOUNDARY CONETRDEit IPDIVUEATEESTS PROPERTY LINES 3 APPROVAL OF THESE IMPROVEMENT PLANS AS SHORN WES MT EXISTING ING CONTOURS -- - CONSTITUTE APPROVAL AT ANY CONSTRUITIM OUTSIDE THE MIS& WUNDARY. WT d ALL WDER6MWD UTILITIES WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT -DF -XAY PROPOSED CUT /FILL LINE _ FILL 11 SNALT BE CONSTAND ED. CONNECTED AND TESTED PRIOR i0 CONS PWTIDN OF BENZ CURB, CROSS GUTTER AM PAVING. PROPOSED CONTOURS � - 5 THE E AM LOCATION OF ESISTIM UNDERGROUND PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS (EXISTEN DPLTHEIAVAI ALBLWE MC pEiO iNE BEE OFi0LW D CdEEEARCA PROPOSED GRAVEL BAGS (SEE SHEET 6) .... - 2.600 EA, NCO 1gq [ TIERESSE IA.Npq, OMXEVDEXq$ ISTHEGCANiDACTDMS %NEDHIPE6D610NTAKE PROPOSED TYPE "D" PCC BROW DITCH 0 -75 �_ ��o� 580 LF SINN (IE ITEINEONVANDAaN AIIEAPXNIDNT I9HAVixDFTSEMCOWCDPINDi SMXN THESE PLANS. PROPOSED 2:1 FILL SLOPE �T pW 6 TO OETORWEROXELEVAT ELEVATION T. UP ACT UtB WORK PROPOSED 2:1 CUT SLOPE 0 CONSTRUCTION OF NEX MR( AACiOn RILL RAKE f %PLOPAiON'! E %CAVAtIWS AM LDOAYE EXIST IM WDERCAOWD PROPOSED DRAINAGE SOURCE (f% MI N.) -- CILITIES SUFFICIENTLY AHEAD ■ CAONSTPllCl TO PERMIT ANY BECAUSE OF PROPOSED PIP -PAP ENERGY DISSIPATOR (D -40) $ :. (SIZING, 21,5 CY SHEET 2) ALTDALOULDCPTIDN E%IOTIINGSTEACILLY[EGECESS PROPOSED 6" AC DIKE (TYPE "A -) (G -5) - 296 LF 7 THE CONTRA RDA SHALL MTIFY THE 5AN DIEGO GAS S EL CTRIC AND SMALLL HI PROPOSED d" AC DIKE (TYPE "E "i (G -5) _. 3.090 LF DOMINATE SWAKKWITORCDMANYYREPREEENTATIVES. PROPOSED COND. CURB G CUTTER TRANSITION _.._ _._ 70.95 LF ���� NOTICE: LNISLPDCJECYIAPE%GI AOEPGERRVVIICCES WITHIN PROPOSED MODIFIED ROLLED CURB PER G4 _' " -" 1.746.85 L ELLEECTNICAL CABLESFAW11ALOAStEIONPIND AND PROPOSED 4" AC PAVEMENT OVER 6" GAGE 54, 743 SF TPWPHONE: 1 TELEPHONE: f 800 d22 -4133 ]DIG ALEPiI PROPOSED EARTHEN TRAIL 9. 9]1 SF PROPOSED 24- WIDE AC PAVEMENT APRON (DS -7) T �� 1 EA. B THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RATIFY PACIFIC BELL TELEPMNE "PINY PRIW TO STARTING WORK NEAP HAD I CILIA! AM SHALL PROPOSED 3' WIDE MOD.PCC OOWNORAIN (D -22) 3 EA. COOMINATE HIS MR WITH COMPANY REPRESENTATIVES. NOTICE: PLL TELEPHONE SERVICES WITHIN THIS EXISTING FENCE REMOVAL 6 RELOCATION - - - -. U. �:? -- 450 LF PROJECT BOUNDARY ARE UMEMRWNO tNETALLAiIMS'. FOP LOCATION OF PROPOSED SLOPE HYDROSEED AREA (SEE SHEET 6) 44,700 SF CABLES AND APPURTENANCES CPACt PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY. ELEPHWE 1 800 d22 -4133 (DIG ALERT] PROPOSED "NO PARKING -PIPE LANE" SIGN ■ d EA 'WATER -� R IT STALLlBE THE FISSSYPONENCIESTYA7 THE BE ELOPER 9 PROPOSED TRAIL BARS" � 20 EA PROPOSED "BRUSH CONCRETE" TRAIL x -ING 410 SF iMPUGVEMENTS. AND 9E AN T E MST OF RELWATIONS IF NEEDED. Z,0 PROPOSED PCC CROSS GUTTER (G -13) / - -I\ 1,090 OF f0 ALL TELEVISIONS SERVICES WITHIN THIS PMJECT AHE RYE NA NTI INS NAACATIONiELEPMMELOIATI�pN402 AjBDES AMC (SWRCB) NOTE ANPN DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS 11 POWER SOURCES AM BINS SERVING STREET LIGHTS SHALL BE SHOWN M THE -AS- BUILT' INPROVDENI DRAoXtIMS. ALL OF STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARS (SWRMBI DRIER No 92 -08 -DWG P. O. E. S. GENERAL PERMITT NC.CAS000002). STE OISCNAAGE REW IPEMENTS NATRM6X6YD1M EASEMENTS DEDICAYECELO THECCITD P`EI6HI -OF- ENCINITAS. SIN. OR DISCHARGES OF STORM WATER RUNOFF ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ". IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PERMIT. A STORM WATER POLLUTION NO 12 0 PAVIND SNAIL BE DONE UN71L EXISTING POWER PALES ARE PREVENTION PLAN (SMPPP) AND A MONITORING PROGRAM PLAN SHALL BE DEVELOPED ANO IMPLEAENTED CONCURRENT WH THE COMMENCEMENT CF OUTSIDE THE ANUS i0 BE PAVED. 13 THE IMII -MA PLL NOT FY AND OBTAIN APPROVAL OF THE WILLING ACTIVITIES AND A COMPLETE 0 ACCURATE NOTICE -OF- INTENT (NOI) ILL DE FILED WITH THE SWRCB. A COPY OF THIS PROJECT SHALE BE FILED HITH IN E CITY OF ENCINITAS WHEN PECEIVEO: FURTHER. A COPY OF T E COMPLETED CITY E... MRK PRIOR TC MAKING GRANGES IN THE FIELD. N01 FROM THE SWRCB SHOWING THE PERMIT NUMBER FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY pF ENCINITAS WHEN RECEIVED. 14 ALL III 10 BE AL, N11MM NIV 3 FOOT HIGH INTENSITY TYPE REFLECTIVE FACE GP EENIVA. IN ADDITION. THE LMOERSIGNED AND SUBSEQUENT OWNER (11 OF ANY PORTION 15 CONTRACT OP SHALL REQUEST FROM THE CITY EMINSER'9 OFFICE OF THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS GRADING PERMIT N.,6277-G. AND BY - SWRCB ORDER No 92 -OB -DWG, AND ANY SUOSEOUENF AMENDMENTS HERETO. AOPRfCWStRUCTII MEETING AM SHALL PROVIDE AT LEAS] 48 UPS OF NOTICE FOR SUCH A MEET IM. (760- 633 -2770) SHALL COMPLY WITH SPECIAL PROVISION S SET ORTH IN SECTION C.7 OF SWRCB RDEP No.92 -0 16 IVATE MAD IMPPAVEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY CITY OFFICIAL S SIGNATURE HEREON DOES ACT CONSTITUTE MPAOVAL OR RESPONSIBILITY UC ANY KIM FDA THE DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION OF THESE PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS. (IF APPLICABLE) OWNE 0 LANS 17 AS HGNTZOMACUiOFF. ANB ALLAN EELADEADNELIGD,LABOVEVIHEE SINN E OF LAND INNER, CORPORATE OFFICER. GATE 16 THE DEVELOPER GHN-L BE RESPONSIBLE THAT ANY MNUMN! BP BE AN RK M N IS OISTURE D M DESTROYED SHALL BE PE- ESTABLISHED AND RED LACED BY A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER OR A LICENSED LAND GE ERAL PARTNER OR PROPRIETOR JlJ//4/ FF3ILVEEk1aoP SUAVEYOA. PSI NTED NAME OF ABOV€ PERSON 19 HE DEVELOPER SHALL MARk THE LOCATION OF EACH BONER LATERAL ANp XAtER SERVICE BV CHIS LING THE LETTERS 'S' 2E:5 AND 'X'. RESPECTIVELY, 2 IWKS HEGH INTO TWE FACE OF THE TITLE 20 THE AM IS OF AGf L T 6µALL BE PAINTED ON THE COM IN A MAI ER AWD LOCATION ASPROVEO BY THE INSPECTOR. 21 ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SHE SAWCUDEGESSTANDAARDLSPECIALSAOY SIOUCIAIITO TfIEATSTANDARDI0N1. OPEC[FICff��AT"S REGIONALOSTANDARD FQU PUBLIC IDEAS COMTRWTIW GNAXIIINNOSM(LATEESTIEDITICN10 CABINET BY I. THE SAN DIEGO APP VEO BY: DATE: LEGAL DESCRIPRON SOUTHEAST UUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ADAPTER OF THE SS THWESI T QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SWTCOUNAYGOF33ANSDIEGO. STATEROFNCALIFORNIA, IN A.P.N.: 264 - 451 -05 SDEADDRESS III UNA RANCH ROAD. ENCINITAS. CA. PERMRTEE DENAMEI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 16685 W ST BERNARDO DRIVE #385 ryjp�}ry SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92127 Yk (856) 613 -2990 NN OWNER DO NO C. CONTE. ADO CARDIFF PROPERTIES 16885 WEST BERNARDO DRIVE #385 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92127 (858) 613 -2990 ESTIMATEDOUANRTIES CUT 9700 L.Y.M FILL I.A. C.Y.W IMPORT 2300 C.Y.W • EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATED FDA PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY ILALCULATEO ON A EORETICAL BASIS ACTUAL QUANTITIES MAY VARY DUE TO SHRINKAGE OR SWELL ACTORS]. F ENVIRONMENTALNOTES: 1, THE STEEPEST EXISTING SLOPE IN THE GRACED AREA IS 24% (EXCLUDING ANY EXISTING MAN MADE SLOPES). 2 VERY MAXIMUM VERTICAL]OEPTO DI CUT IS 8.5 AND THE MAXIMUM 3, A.1 AVERAGE DEPTH = VOLUME OF CUT (C,F.1 = R00 % P7 1 97' OF CUT AREA OF CUT (S.F.1 Rf2 >. 631 B.1 AVERAGE DEPTH = VOLUME OF FILL (C,F.) 12 0 00 % 2> 31 OF FILL AREA OF ILL (S .F,1 -404TH KEY MAP KEY MAP LEGEND PROPERTY BOUNDARY ES. SEWER ...... __. EXIXISTT, WATER -- vl - - - -- PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WN �i A. Wq �CE � HLL iE pq 11 VICINITY d VALLEY VICINITY MAP W,eT Qf1 •J)l PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APP EO^ GIAIING PLAN FOR - 62 DATE: W BY: MNi BY' � N- E R.C.E. N0.5 - DATE,"'`ol_. TPM 98 -272 ADAMS RUN X FY PaSCO EX, I ..__.. __ -•�- 'NAPA GMELANE'NOTE NO PARKING FIRE LANE SIGNS SHALL BE 10STEO ON ALL EIRE ACCESS ROADS LESS THAN 40 FEET IN WICIM. ACCESS ROADS LESS AN 32 FEET PRIVATEROAD CEFi71F/CATION TN WIDTH SHALL BE POSTED ON BOTH SIDES AND ACCESG SASS MORE HAN 32 FEET BUT LESS THAN 40 FEET IN WI DTM BE OSTSO ON %HALL I CERTIFY THAT THE PRIVATE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON ON ONE SIDE ONLY. SIGNS SHALL BE SPACED MAXIMUM OF 150 EST THIS PLAN SATISFIES THE REQUIREMENTS AS STATED IN THE FINAL ON CENTER. WHEN SIGNS RE REQUIRED ON BOTH $IDE THEY SHALL O. NOTICE OF APPADVAL FOR TPA 98 -272. AM THE STIMANW FAA BE STAGGERED SO THAT THERE IS ONE (11 SI SN P MAXIMUM OF 75 FEET PRIVATE STREETS. ON ALTERNATING SIDES OF THE ACCESS ROADIE) SIG S SHALISE PLAINLY VISIBLE FROM ANY LOCATION UN AN ACCESS ROAD(S). SIGNS SHALL BE BY: �� "S DATE: PEP ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. Z`� XAYNE A ASCO. {CE I ppOVES$jOA, ti 'P 29577 ^` � Exp. ,A. 03/31/03 > cK >r CIVIL 4)F CF CRL7V"' APP VEO BY: DATE: LEGAL DESCRIPRON SOUTHEAST UUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ADAPTER OF THE SS THWESI T QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SWTCOUNAYGOF33ANSDIEGO. STATEROFNCALIFORNIA, IN A.P.N.: 264 - 451 -05 SDEADDRESS III UNA RANCH ROAD. ENCINITAS. CA. PERMRTEE DENAMEI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 16685 W ST BERNARDO DRIVE #385 ryjp�}ry SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92127 Yk (856) 613 -2990 NN OWNER DO NO C. CONTE. ADO CARDIFF PROPERTIES 16885 WEST BERNARDO DRIVE #385 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92127 (858) 613 -2990 ESTIMATEDOUANRTIES CUT 9700 L.Y.M FILL I.A. C.Y.W IMPORT 2300 C.Y.W • EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATED FDA PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY ILALCULATEO ON A EORETICAL BASIS ACTUAL QUANTITIES MAY VARY DUE TO SHRINKAGE OR SWELL ACTORS]. F ENVIRONMENTALNOTES: 1, THE STEEPEST EXISTING SLOPE IN THE GRACED AREA IS 24% (EXCLUDING ANY EXISTING MAN MADE SLOPES). 2 VERY MAXIMUM VERTICAL]OEPTO DI CUT IS 8.5 AND THE MAXIMUM 3, A.1 AVERAGE DEPTH = VOLUME OF CUT (C,F.1 = R00 % P7 1 97' OF CUT AREA OF CUT (S.F.1 Rf2 >. 631 B.1 AVERAGE DEPTH = VOLUME OF FILL (C,F.) 12 0 00 % 2> 31 OF FILL AREA OF ILL (S .F,1 -404TH KEY MAP KEY MAP LEGEND PROPERTY BOUNDARY ES. SEWER ...... __. EXIXISTT, WATER -- vl - - - -- PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WN �i A. Wq �CE � HLL iE pq 11 VICINITY d VALLEY VICINITY MAP W,eT Qf1 •J)l PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APP EO^ GIAIING PLAN FOR - 62 DATE: W BY: MNi BY' � N- E R.C.E. N0.5 - DATE,"'`ol_. TPM 98 -272 ADAMS RUN X FY PaSCO EX, I ..__.. __ -•�- Rr.;1x CEL2 � - I a — y I a l f,N E* tlArE1W E rX I 4rt 9 _._: TENS�G4 6, AL CO)STIEnT FENCE ' � IN6TALL M PA9NIA' as I I I a4i -sew' 8I;'.. I PARCEL I EPAD45 &0 ' � Z y I' P 4N 6 d i III GTFT 16 OPIYEWAY - 4Y pr M 41 ILM$ I � �LFDf� )FIE( o n lxna ' 1 4495 449 f FL 2 tnsraa( 46Sf 0 Pfd SIGN PAD;e47o&. \ FUEL IC TRAIL EASEMENT PORLIC UTILITY- INSTALL 8' WIDE RECREATIONAL EASEMENT 2)' PRIVATE ROAD 6 TRAIL PER CITY STANDAP9S g zii SERER EASEMENT 42' EXISTING i£ET 4 FOR. fg GRamD - .. ao �. -- _. I6AE -. INSTALL 6" ROLLED CU LOPE 6 GUTTER (Si0 DAG 6-4) _2i SIftt — . y PRCPpBED 2f - - INSTALL 6' POLLED CORD 6 Ir6iut GUT FILL SLOE 6 TER fSTO DMG G -4) PW 0V£P 6 &5E-- •F INSTALL 4 AC PUNT OVER 6" RASE 0". PEP o-n SECTION C-C SECTION AA: cTR-2m- lx+}aEHar~ DRIVEWAY 24'WIDE PRNATE ROAD FER G-14, FOR NOT r0 SCALE .1 TO SCALE LEO 6 _ P/L f / 1]5 115 MIN. PROPOSED z i AL'0'S5 SOgOwAY PEA 5837 -G 0 CJT ROLLED CURB INSTALL 6 POLLED CURB R (Bi0 DWG 6 ) -� 6 6U/TER (STD DWO C-4) f ^ , 2: 1 SLOPE T INSTAL' SEO 2:1 " -. PROPOSED 2:1 I L SLOPE �- ILL SLOPE Ffl' q! 9 I STALL 4 AC - -- SECTION E-E R o R E rsrl P., C— E' BASE FILL BERM aER cirT. iLNTpAP°ROS �01N0 ( ) RA SECTION B-8: NOT TD SCALE ExrsTTns RECPEAr1ONAf. r IL 24' WIDE DRIVEWAY •c.A+r NOT TO SCALE W4E FF1TE.mA�f *LENTE(YINE PIC (pA0 SUTI L1 as EASEL9LMEM I•� 4¢ /D� s / A • ... _— iM�aO�ason s r., �� ,b e ` EASEMRNTNOTES fio ' b 1 P �449d FP _ S06E�EAST PE"FSw: 5 { r IYf Hp 6 D 0 vao' MICE 0.IVEN�AIN ApMICIPN. WATER OIS-T B I e. t 0 * X��� 4�� SEE' SFEE - EASEIENi PER (9f.' SEC. 1 -31-62 AS FILE A0. 8555 OF cErrctu "'0"'. rNSrau FtRE nv Nr � � I ExISTInG 4 9 BW ( O .. N E PRIVATE -1 0 Ol-TY EASEMENT PER 60C, P=c f 31-64 AS FILE HO EEP4 OF OFFICIAL PEUDS25' ENS DI2 FEP D-40. �<) PRIVATE ROAD 8 -111 EASE1iM PER LUL TEC / / y , iiDN FM1YF „ (f0 6k1 A 1 18- 3f >f a6 FILE NJ. .86534 OF OFFICIAL IELUIbS. . Y IN FAVOR OF PATRICV H. SILLOY FT k 2 B' WIL9 RECREATIONL TRAtt- + F/ WILE ONWO EASEMENT PER px. FEC. 10-]1 -J4 As PER CITY STAA9N95 .INSTALL 4" AC qq 4v.40A6 v \ INYTALLHT AApAN6" SzCN' * F/P I4- 2)2832 OFFICIAL PEGW10s, INSTALL TYPE E" AL OVER 6" BASE MIN. INSTALL TYPE E AC 7 ± �' PROP(7SED sa66E EnsEn€r+r rta mL rEC. v f5 -n as Fm Dc�i aaLED w D hlsrAiL *IN >`s i7N t / /.'r C7 n -maiR4 a a�tcrx rEicros. DIKE PER G s e , - t OPEN SPACEEAS „ + Arce oNWn. EASEMENT PEa Dec. TEL. f2 -S -6B ' DEC, P ROLLED a BAIXIN3 AIR- V SB AT � CONC. L1R9 PER G-4 G9:WNI ; 1 S\ * �, BEP DW40 y0' 5 *MICCI 1 STA 13 +2532- ]ar6336i F/P nlsrm6 p.W , x PBR IiNA AR AS RJF eSANITATI a- Grr:IC T RELCr9s. srA ) +52.46- fs.fe.3z) SECTION CH k�S fj rRrA7;;r �B� cAroIFF sANnArrw Dtsr9lcr EASEMENT PER L x PORTUNA RANCH ROAD .ue WA"cM W`MP w T mrKNSr W. tD OPOSEDO SRACE EAS / NEC, 1f -fo-94 AS F/P 94- 655z>s D- cFFICrAL Rccams. * + - f2* wI( i L * AS TO Dl— PER SOC. REC. rf.Y�_L +sL_ 'w TO SCALE * Al nrd" eFsJ�Fin, ,. PER FETAL FELMAP +FRAIN Ea SE �, EA O S F/P sussoe_ -_ -7� . e + PSP lMkrR ' + # Y Id4 FElkE * ' IANL PAY-) Rt �� PAR 4J0 >S INSTALL k^ flAIXIAG RI ��"i * _ 'EN39Y OI;551PATOR PEA P k e qOq # ,4 fi A ry 1 ` v- p7"Pt�if C ff14AIF1 & 0 2f 6. xe e 01016%15 THICK) FA 404. ��' 3 `- ' 'IN5Al l PA 'xb'l " s' llL SLOPE EY1-81 WA JOTS PRIOR , BE M OF M IWT/n. AT fAPLICf3 0 0 9nFW ro aEa OF THE INSTALL TYPE E'--- • /�//1 - \ .. _ 5•. _- AL OL(E PEP G 5 L SLOPE 2'➢ / pyi FILPE 3925 aO5'0 •� //- 1E01 5' TPAN3ITIW TO IrySTALL 6' WIDE FAD � 4pgq ' f1I I +-! AL N L 33 J4 K 6" CCNL. 0189 US WALKWAY _f2 3' RAG. TRANS Ps1 1 GLFHLINE STD. LIX.'C. aa. � .� T s o., _ � RaLEro cuae -- SECTION F -F: m k \ a _ _ ............ NOT TO SCALE ry I A V / bW AWAAS FIRIONA `� , 1NSTAUP FIXINN ENT 11 4 PARCE[.4419s MP / INSrAIA M -f0 XE(A WAKpENr r 7 N 0 IPA 111,E .lf9.B 1 15] INSTALL A- ]SENT (1M1 CONC. A-- LCORE /TLO AAPRON L� PAD420JI oea 11 % l _ SHEET 3 hQ�9 K 1u wrrr -v-WAr ro crry.� DETAIL: DRAINAGE OUTLET PCL 3 —11 p- B,cvmns rFn.mrox } rEn1gML Ex1 gAw + "''B. .� "'- , w.� w fz -aa1s� .1 10 ECALE GR:l4M OR IpCWAY 4Ml LIM-1 -- , PO ! nPT M 451 le 1F_ / e a �� 'rM ♦ �MrtlEA iWW Y3 Fw4T EXISTING GRO(MD RAV4'S O:DSIttO AN) AOiMEO \ _ _ -_ - ___..� - H . ✓ _ VARIES f 6 - IXrsiRS.F'rm -A ~- 2% FADED C.� .S•AT „_ rA�l a nE M _ 6C0.M;HETE LLR9 RIXY( -ING, NA2 J5 2 PAO 40J.0 OP?il '(' - - r' %. - AND PROPN BACKIN0. 1I- LAYER FILTER FABRIC .. PROPOSED SECTION K -IC SECTION 1 -1 •r PROPOSED PAD R EASE tCGL 1EIDU5 x ., In R �'I' � PDT TO SCALE ypuI i ADS ffCpO 0- LTLpi FER(IifM * I PDT TO SCALE A9.IC urnrrr EA93ENr lER A GETAL,S 4 - TRAIL A9Nr SEE y ARIas alb a-Tmm. PL&.IC TRA - lli I i. � f£L'FE TIONAI. LEASE TRAIL MEAD MIOT A THICK PAUSFEO CIXJCPETE NFpOFESSI0,y4 eF w W TRAIL TREAD LK OVER p9AIN PIPE QUO a� A pQS 2 — P n m N0. 29577 O '^ 3" PVL ORA }N PIPE - SEESEBETSS& 6FOR FORTT7NA RANCEROAD I111PROVEMI:NTS DIP, PAM4 l Ezp. 03/31/03 v STANOARO RttLEO Lid9 OG -41 * o DETAIL: CURB OUTLET PER D -27 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 " -50' .St OIV7L NOT i0 SALE 4�Cf CA1.7F 8 0 50 10C 150 ces er W, er uWam er REVIS —S APPROVE DATE REFERENCES BENCHMARK SCALE PF WAP APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINI TAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DRAWING N0. t G. RFf OW _ E DESCRIPTION: CO. BENCI API "OC- 0073" PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION DFJ RECOMMENDED APP ED RARING PLAN FOR p CHISELED SQUARE IN TOP 6Y: TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN 6277 —G Wp{ AON Sgeo, .FMP RGIiIi OF HEADWALL Pizox DATE: A7 eo 8V; /VI / -I lL _ ,, a ,8 LOCATION: SW NORTER6ERANCHONSANTA FE - R.C.E. N0.195ZL DATE: �L/ 0/ DATE:- ROAD TicAL /A WAYNE PASCO ENP _$3=43 WpPW PROJECT N0. SHEET 2 OF 8 vER x ELEV 119.476 OATUM. USC6G6 e DULL TREAD em GONOE'F \-A4<A OF FU61. 1EOIEA— 111 Me% ONDSSIAG ff rNln, r0 BE R'IXf DDDCiE8 OfIM<' As-B�ru I � 99r N cm+ 1c�iw s GU DEP PARCEL3 cn �r a� DETAIL: PEDESTRIAN RAMP U .1 TO SCA " j 'Q 2 A5-BULL7 BULB DATA 0��rh'C M 55,E 48 40 '`w. �G� LINE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH PLAN: ADAM'S RUN SEE RADIN PGR _ S118 GRADING PLAN 3 C7 55'427 28.00' 27.25' ,itASgC &A SGLE Pp,OFE5570ryq J• cz 852023 10.00' 14. as' '•... (PRrvA'rE) SEE S7�ET5 FOR ^ �aE A pqs <^y am v " °A )ice t i RECREA71ONAL 7RAd PLAN �,� o� "plbW A' _ g,, C3 ita •g0'ts^ 30.00' 62,14' °av a c % �g 6 Exp 03%31/03 v ` s'e C4 39'51 OS' 30 00' 20.87' CA 55.45'27° 26 00 L7.25, O a F b�LK CAIi�� C7 85 °20"23 IC. DO' 14.89' �a REVISi01a DATE REVERENCES DATE BENCHMARK SCALE SPECIAL DISTRICT " APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN DRAWING N0. 3 DESCRIPTION: CO. BENCHMARK "OC- 00)3" PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APP " TPM GRACING PLAN FOR J CHISELED SOUAPE IN TOP RNK—HAI f. 4° GATE: Bv: �n �^ 8.. 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN GF HEADWALL LOCATION: SW CORNER EL CAMN DEt R.L.E. NO. POADE 6 RANCHO SANTA FE 1tAL AYNE PASCO EXP -'+f 0'+ DATE: 2 /L /I WORK PROJECT N0. $HEFT 3 DE 8 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 n48 "'�f PyiMA (— Isl �SaA S pp Y�LCFa' �IXy � I .0 1 1 `ly G i PARCEL I S� I "'I � �2G� - "_ =III - _ .— — — —.. E %]3i1W fi0' MLR' I EA4# A NO WfY1( -ff-WAG FOD fl018 Am, �r19.L.1!9H. FEC 1 -3fiN. �, y —. A5rNL MPAMPG'Slp.' I ExrSinuG fi' MAIEA.RE t5 Rn aan ErrEw'rw A39 ` rsIM.01 ATEII¢'L'IIW AOAM3 1- --�" rxN QNTBLIIE oo 1 I ]MMUYflENi9 5`+ ea be'...z 22B 43ffH0' 443X LIE rA.TA TA MIA RI0R6 LEIBrH 8%MN(9� AAP N MF ._. IY� ^. � �' •�, •.. %'!u,. ` _� "� ' .... ' CALL H19ED D]VJEIE RIW I � mRROVI� men ActESPazcz, m __ EL -FL.os -FL ID —SHED 63 Y9'13" 300.00 33151 LENTEFLIlE L2 505'2809'W 21339 CENIERLRE e DULL TREAD em GONOE'F \-A4<A OF FU61. 1EOIEA— 111 Me% ONDSSIAG ff rNln, r0 BE R'IXf DDDCiE8 OfIM<' As-B�ru I � 99r N cm+ 1c�iw s GU DEP PARCEL3 cn �r a� DETAIL: PEDESTRIAN RAMP U .1 TO SCA " j 'Q 2 A5-BULL7 BULB DATA 0��rh'C M 55,E 48 40 '`w. �G� LINE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH PLAN: ADAM'S RUN SEE RADIN PGR _ S118 GRADING PLAN 3 C7 55'427 28.00' 27.25' ,itASgC &A SGLE Pp,OFE5570ryq J• cz 852023 10.00' 14. as' '•... (PRrvA'rE) SEE S7�ET5 FOR ^ �aE A pqs <^y am v " °A )ice t i RECREA71ONAL 7RAd PLAN �,� o� "plbW A' _ g,, C3 ita •g0'ts^ 30.00' 62,14' °av a c % �g 6 Exp 03%31/03 v ` s'e C4 39'51 OS' 30 00' 20.87' CA 55.45'27° 26 00 L7.25, O a F b�LK CAIi�� C7 85 °20"23 IC. DO' 14.89' �a REVISi01a DATE REVERENCES DATE BENCHMARK SCALE SPECIAL DISTRICT " APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN DRAWING N0. 3 DESCRIPTION: CO. BENCHMARK "OC- 00)3" PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APP " TPM GRACING PLAN FOR J CHISELED SOUAPE IN TOP RNK—HAI f. 4° GATE: Bv: �n �^ 8.. 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN GF HEADWALL LOCATION: SW CORNER EL CAMN DEt R.L.E. NO. POADE 6 RANCHO SANTA FE 1tAL AYNE PASCO EXP -'+f 0'+ DATE: 2 /L /I WORK PROJECT N0. $HEFT 3 DE 8 77-,T e VPI ) 3f- PRO EflTYTY I N PARR a E 8 PM 17PS7 a 88 6 ko E �Es PARDELa � y a FER CITY C;' EM1CI IiAS 60 NILE Nile 1E NDAI S NtLIi EASfIfM a Y o Ab.CS -121 �1 ^ MAP 13M GRAPHIC SCALE 1 " °AO' /fI — — — I Y Ew�TING FEfJEATIIXUt - -II g 161 AS FILE Ib.19B34 p� ExiSTIN+' B IfE I LY415' k' PC O Ao eo f2o CIL ww RRILON ROAD j DOVE Nee Iz foDr se HOLLOW "., .� ROAD, Rt _ I w D_FPaESS ROLLED Cue io E7tsztic CUVBLINE 9 o � XISiIAC B" HATE PER RIP RAP EAEPGY DISSIPA TOR F =� PER D -41 NP.2 —ING. fiLREP EA L� i S.-, iY LIVE I d� k 6 / o,E'x1.6' MArE ro Das oVEasmE SAO rea LuE s 1mz as ^ -EL 1D - ��� _ uutn FLwsz6f ew AR., aY- D3e3zsi W �' 1 �� pp b - 8 SEE SHEET3� $ c BEESHEET5FOR ts'� R6 y� gz e REOREA770NAL TRAIL PLAN 6 - -'PARCEL 3 PAD G—E i� D q/iLEI INTO PROPOSES �.° RIP -RAP EAERGY DISSIPAIM PER — o -ID yt44'Lg pig �8 DETAIL: OVERSIDE DRAINox�l ADT TO SCALE Qp,OFE$slpA, ��� .e i� QS Fc � � 09I161DE p1TA ti 3p C x ND. 29677 ° m PLAN: DOVE HOLLOW ROAD "E D. <. ExD. 03/31/03 a L1598'4z f0'E 80AB' �fIiEPLfiE � (PWVATEJ L 588'42 f0'E fBO. >f' CENTETWIAE J'l CML �� OF' CALiF APPROVE DATE REFERENCES DATe BENCHMARK SCALE SPECIAL DISTRICT APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DRA REVI51oH5 P PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF I RECOMMENDED AP QVED6 RADING PLAN FOR DESCRIPTION: CO, eENCHMARN OC -0073 HIS. EL s° °ARE IN TOP ' - AD. DATE: I s BY: 'v""' EY: TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN 6277 —G d� DF HEADWALL NDRfzoxe%_ 'r LOCATION: SW GOPHER EL LAMIHO DEL 4 ��� R.C.E. NO.� DATE; 1 /i�4) DATE: L NOR ROADE 6 RANCHO SANTA FE NERTiIA' WAYNE PASCO Q E %P._3_3]_Q3. WORN PROJECT NO. SHEET 4 OF 8 q � $� a a REVI330N3 OVEO DATE REFERENCES OATE 3 S e DESCRIPTION: LOCATION: SW ELEV 119.4J6 i ww PIAAN: FO SCALE IM 1'x40' SCALE VER ]`e8' MAIN DATA TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH REMARKS 5928' 30' FlL'P 1500 -D) L2 N3> 3J f]'£ 59.69' 30' RCP (1500 -0) L3 Nf6 4559W 26.00' fB" RLP (1500 -Df L4 N2 23'12W 2b2' 18" PCP (]500-0 RANCH ROAD (PRIVATE) CURB DATA LINE B BEARING D DELTA R RADIU5 L IfA srBS QP Nq REMARKS Cf 3 y 32'0640" 2 Ohm �%� No. 29577 a E%O. 03/31/03 a *`$q UNA RANCH ROAD (PRIVATE) CURB DATA LINE B BEARING D DELTA R RADIU5 L IfA srBS QP Nq REMARKS Cf 3 y 32'0640" 2 Ohm �%� No. 29577 a E%O. 03/31/03 a *`$q LL�yy w`da0C'F CIYlI �P2} CALlf 5]'3518" 2 20.00' 1 18.01' T TYPE £ AC OWE 14 3 33310" ] ]88.00' 1 11.66' T TYPE 'E' AC OINE C5 2 25012" 2 212.00' 1 10.50' C C0.^K'. C6G TRANS. C6 2 2'O748 " 1 E^ ¢ 6.99' C - "`f .` u �_.N1 LB 4 NSS S]59'X 8 4'2048' f fBB.W' ] ]426' C CpaL'. C6G TRANS. SBB S>59'E 8 •I....a9�� TYPE E" AC OIHE _ DETAIL: AC DI IKE/CONC. CURB G TIER PER TRANSTNON F 4 4 d4 MT i0 SCALE UNA RANCH ROAD (PRIVATE) CURB DATA LINE B BEARING D DELTA R RADIU5 L IfA srBS QP Nq REMARKS Cf 3 y 32'0640" 2 Ohm �%� No. 29577 a E%O. 03/31/03 a *`$q LL�yy w`da0C'F CIYlI �P2} CALlf rf AC D DIKE& CONCRETE C CURB DATA LINE B BEARING D DELTA R RADIU5 L LENGTH R REMARKS Cf 3 32'0640" 2 20.00' 1 11.21' T TYPE "E aC OWE C2 5 5]'3518" 2 20.00' 1 18.01' T TYPE £ AC OWE 14 3 33310" ] ]88.00' 1 11.66' T TYPE 'E' AC OINE C5 2 25012" 2 212.00' 1 10.50' C C0.^K'. C6G TRANS. C6 2 2'O748 " 1 188.00' 6 6.99' C C0.VC. C6G TRANS. LB 4 NSS S]59'X 8 4'2048' f fBB.W' ] ]426' C CpaL'. C6G TRANS. L2 S SBB S>59'E 8 859.49' T TYPE E" AC OIHE SCALE SPECIAL DISTRICT APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN DRAWING NO.' 3" PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDE APP EO AD NG PLAN FOR P n ILO o P W1�0 GATE: /1 q BY: BT: / FE V R.C.E. NO.ygSJZ_ DATE; 2/4111 TPM 98 -272 ADAMS RUN 6 — 4 i1cAL a AYN E %P.jLLj S woRx PROJECT No. SHEET 5 OF 8 PE J66F L +, — H I I� 'r l j IEk75 AoAdr t' I i..._ 4 ± ,- � I I I i. L � t - -:-" 1---'- �440 I-T-�- ....i_._.— -- — I t Pa .us 9 L . _. r 0 1 f!1 l �i 9f� � - - � I �'� � � � ' -�— m _ '_ _ - i I , -I t" . _ -I - --+- -- -410 c ! yE e t - r r _ ROkIeT 8 AST I�/ 1 ` IV !1 r r1' — L i I I . r r I I I i t I ` I I 16x00 a 17+00 18+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14x00 19x00 20+00 � N X Q¢ _ Q' yaaJmc+ a Sm9` S4 �fv / � � NPTCH E MN p{gTEL IN PLACE _ / Ex GP - fM4TLN _ cis CONSTRUCnON CENTERLME DATA UNE BEARING DELTA KADIU6 LENGTH REMARK6 u nree sr 59'w 1se.52 cw sraucrlavc b.� t�L4 "„ /� E%�4pPLTPY_ V / - n cT C6 L2 532.09321! 59.52'29' 200.00 2404:5; LCONS CIL L2 d]•3904' 200.00' 16628 CONSTRUCTION C/L Y "� SPECS OIKEb CONCRElECURB DATA d $ C"FM�N JTwwwTSd+3 w p ,r- ' • " ` ^ n f I' 6E TS (1e•' ^9s / a + Y / �g LIN E BEARING DELTA DIU5 NGTH REMARKS Lf SBB'575 �f9B.52 TYF£ E" AC plxE -� i ^ e oU RanGS SNAw- \\ \ "*;. py v •� m _ q �- QQQ \:uai: CoI.2 1 oR 5A 1�e.r w<R E 'o ~ `� L2 N8857 -14 1930520 TYPE £" AC DYE CI 33'3528' 1 00 1]5.E4' TYPE £' AC 0➢rE 54'0256 21200 1 99 TYPE £ C DIRE /// `b �s s ?el t4...^2 \ee• .59 C3 3ro2'56` f8B 00' 10.00 CONC. CBGAttuNS. C QE qPP, -x6D PT IE AST J41ioa�RS �C� t i• (jFM 5� " RwrN Fr�r.L C4 2'4211' RIG 00 'G. C 4 Cb0 TRANS. CS 0'42'38" M W 2.33 CPVC C6E TRANS. A, (12oviDE 1 O'd6I6" 212 00 —0 aG mANsd 13 N32'0932£ ' ].68 COW = TRANS QPPLt6 T•e „:#Y ENwtA- 6E b > Qer ERRC�E i,�t RPPCi<nTSeal fro"^ 1. pp - p,'ViLr,�+, 'rs+y9Z !<� '+fir \ ✓ >� Ld 532'0932'W ].f6 CINL CCGTRANS. L5 N32'09'32£ 26.62 TYPE £" Al DINE Lfi S. V932 W 191.85 TYPE E' AC OLCE -..- . ' i / My \l:p1c Qw1416 p •""" i y, EROa2oa CoNr¢A, RAiPMal 9, 4 ^M FR PERMANENT L] N32'0932£ J3.f0 TYPE £ PC DIKE C) 2]'3]55" 12400' 59.80 TYPE£ AC G.E 'i' g s�9 FM .wU >t 6E S�J STALLED Srl fsrJ4rNCrrtr1 K YY��yy / / .0 ! ��,+�7 SECDfiO EReueN QeNTReL ✓ea hnA:ei �a�g� �W /o CB 23'24'00' 100.00' 40dd TYPE 'E" AC DIKE N� Or y,.�' xtH .{els.,}��:n`B 'm �U $ m / 8�b' 4 q,`a rg °b 9 .n rWE dYbwAiEe °.Jr,@kroa STORM DEN67H ACABLE BEARING LENGTH REMARKS w <rH ra aW PerRS, Dq �$ N ?` � A < a THfi arm hAa b.a EQ amQ lE?iSfYZNo TNA"F wi*H ?HE UNE Lf N5622 d9'W 9.J5' 18'HCP Rs aeoN as as FE 'Te De So. 'It. 2N6rA LCED 2N RrtoR DgK/rE ': �A y ✓R� - ^'� Ot4b � '"^� L2 14622491 2450 fe'�P L3 IS622 ASV f0T5 I 1B "RCP �IY�N A N � PPRoJE4 RPP�- xcncxo.3 Qa y p�'� C� �n �p CDJCRP4E R� 5 s� +1\ 1'+e PGCteR I. '(ajMP I11wxJ1Lx ENCE 00x4 r,WCxcN . �4A NS2HE RniJ� S?ERbo ePE P>Eb 5-° �.4� \ 4 Q� � K, � ��m E SJb« : Aai �o 4 e C•e JTY =J X�4 I, ✓H> fwN A— B A4 L DhoT N EE r TtED BY TNE'. N' E JN o1 . R.- RNy N Iir vOO Y ✓r Q ^ 'i 'c '{N Y.a �• FDQ AeQro JA o N*,ZCCd W,R J` �e eR QI -c-4- 4- STeRM. I'.15Y eF PLC Sv ppLTE3 1-b ED -c-4- '1NE A nwNN£R o•��� m y 4 q� GRADIT1NGW,L-14033 5A{ 6E RE.'fw SNCD DN Je0 ?^VYE SHf THAT �OF ESSjbq, A4DJS r-1 DE PCOY.„ENT "" ce PLSTE 3NSTwlI_A•rroN =N 4R 4I RS oR LEs3 O <F FeRECaar RaiN N,R4'� ?� A pdS,OF'Y Af.&- -AER S408rSCaY TEO rD 2Ne aRE Cen RLAVCE '✓rH �; (I J 94 .1, '=D`6 CpMrY OF SAN DIEGO —G THE oTY` pL� Ag c—a L6 SrDRMWATER REGiJLa Tiwva AT 'K'-TT'Hes. ND. 29577 m AA•E 6ESWA2N4e R- a EXD. 03 /31/03 T 4 OEPAPTMENT OF POSLIC i THE SMP �bL rnNAO6nEN PMA rS[E� RXr TNis RAN >Hwtt BE Sin PLEIn LNTfiD AW Ab�.+WRNN+Q YE DOUGLPS M. ISBELL GRAPHIC SCALE •4° PLAN. FORTUNA RANCH ROAD (PRIVATE) "N°NED�' IXNTY ENCx EER Pa RATED LNra eA Li;JLLr ✓eNT TBE tENTi4cLy NE6A yJC -T+iR3 OF �q C L g4e,AE< CONtf RU[I't'oN AeTi✓Srti3 eN aNMwATER a'A`� CAllf �ofEaY S ✓+C+rL FIXV XU3( XIIHIN COUNTY .AIHI�ICTIWa SLALE Hp?1 " =d0' e 0 40 BO 120 SCALE: VEft 1' ^B' BY:�.P4�OPTE:Io'gW TMV x @Below lsrNE PeRnsTFCSR ryry 'b�(.aY, ANwF fy„a pSEeo oR �.nwzzaT+Ew pi OnR RE4.a�T SN D'w'44C6n�.n�RYrseN BY iNE Xo rNTY 4A O^f .TF N u OJMO {'q,'I TN@YmwT@R R REDegq R1M Dwsrw AJ aCCaOM @LR ALTLRNNrRiE REFERENCSS BENCHMARK SCALE SPECIAL DISTRICT APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN DRAWING N0.2 HEVISIOgs - Hav6D °PTE DESCRIPTION: CD. BENCNMARK "01-00)3" CHISELED SQUARE IN TOP DF HEADWALL LOCATION: SN CORNER EL CAMI NO DEL NORTE B RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD ELEV 119.476 DATUM: USC6GS M° SZOx T1CAL PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF Q D ppTE.� /J.' R. E, NO 295ZL —'YN A WAY NE PABCO Exp � 111c EN0E0 APP EN Br: nn. M .% BY' GATE: 2 G DPTE: Z'7"OI GRADING PLAN FOR: TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN XOFN PROJECT N0. 6277 —G (, SHEET 6 OF 8 V PET 6F EXISTING RECREATIONAL TRAIL — EXISTING SO RIGHT- OF-NAY PER RGAG- -I11 1-1 ESC INCI�TAL PIITPOB RE PES, MHOLLOW ROAD p(/AC s o fe�x7aE AavzrEe _ 53 a>y TRq /L lc�Nns%urAwlz) A1�W�IVLSIIXJ BCIA-0ARY Il1l �— FEK/9/PF.P7.Fq/L USYS ' (3" X 3" 6PaVNE WH />E SY �5) ®a.�Ya3nrn Xer vases (9 "K9'r�INAVCWN /TE5YM60G5 O NnH.�p NR"H) n G�'caFSa+A /,E cr�q<s/ce'aece�ncwA[ gpPRay p ELN /NAlbV/ �'OLOR'QROtr u ® ACC S/sNTEX1'p �f'�'1�"o aV�_SSU.fE SE S /T /✓E trfA65 //� EiwVrr� "vRS, BGKit'lGitCC STY B/VA,- G64GC!>RIX?✓O AF /Y CGS ]O MTU � /NINE f.9nDpo5 /R N EXISTING RECREATIONAL TRAIL — EXISTING SO RIGHT- OF-NAY PER RGAG- -I11 1-1 ESC INCI�TAL PIITPOB RE PES, MHOLLOW ROAD �EXISTING RECREATIONAL TRAIL _ A F P -13PBS _ .. \ A1�W�IVLSIIXJ BCIA-0ARY Il1l llp I• . Y 1z' EASEMENT LINE 1 EASEMENT O TO TRAIL MAFKEF POSITIONED LINE. \ TREAD WIDTH NOT INTERFERE WITH DRAINAGE OR INGRESS 6 EGRESS TG A. E %ISTING FROM THE TflA1L O.G. GR NATIVE SOIL x SEE NOTES BELOW TRAIL SLpaFACE TYPICAL SECTION G -G RECREATION TRAIL NOT TO SCALE 11 ' (A. B RANI UNA 12' (GRTMRANLH RGAG1 EASEMENI LINE EASEMENT LINE 1, TRAIL MAPo(EN PCStTIONED TO B. NOT INTERFERE WITH DRAINAGE OR INGRESTSRq EGRESS TO AND 1 -TTNG TREAD FROM HE IL__ z O.6 OR NATIVE . L� TRaII 11 IS TYPICAL SECTION H -H RECREATION TRAIL NOT TO SCALE 4-7% 4 +42.1S INSTALL 1 1 TRAIL TREAD l/ 8-/O% 7d' BY CryY 0,vsrmzfvAFTt`K WATER eAa U AS5/MfS MFN✓1r•�v NL�. 1PLL !E"b /XANZD(. ZO" 5/lE ANO S c CO/OKIAY ry N1\ hP 1pL l l "IESPAACING .•l /Q uPSLOPE q�Lis>£o. \ N ... tom 0pP epP C _._.'zrENO IMUM Cif as e�'Rev °ols111ADTDR MPty �' WATER BAR DETAIL NDT To seALE GRAPHIC SCALE 1 " -50' 0 50 100 150 \ ,y09�Q O 3 /B TH tcrc CONTINUOUS / RUBBER IN. w, RETENTION 0 CBS/ CU F TRAIL TREAD 4 MIN -MIN. -F- COMPACTED SOIL` _ 30tl GALVANIZED ® 1, O C 'FAB INSTAL GUTTER RE LNKRETE 2 x 6 TREATED WD00 2 ROWS TAGGERED q � CROSS GUTTER PER B-11 i<�eA03z FPM mao WATER BAR CROSS SECTION HOT TO SCALE BLGDIVI — BOUNDARY RECREATION TRAIL NOTES q q q 1. BRUSH ROCKS DEB IS D OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE EMOVEO FROM TRAIL IL SURFACE SHALL BE COMPACTED TD iu a qR :Y MIN. BO %. SURFACE TYPE 5 ALL BE NATIVE SOIL OR DECOMPOSED GRAM iE AS APPROVED BY TIE CITY INSPECTOR. 2, MAXIMUM CUT SLOPE IS 2:1. MAXIMUM FILL SLOPE IS 2:1. - - - - - - - - 3. VERTICAL GRADE OF TRAIL SHALL NOT EXCEED 20 %. CROSS SECTION OF TRAIL SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1% OR _— —1 GREATER THAN 2 %. `• FQjjT�)HA - RAHDH - _— DAD_.. - 5. VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 12 SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL POINTS. 5, PRDV30E WATER BARS PER CITY OF ENCINITAS TRAIL STANDARDS ON - — '- SLBDIVISION SOUW:RY TRAILS WITH GRADES OF 7% OR GREATER. THE MINIMUM SPACING SHALL BE ONE WATER BAR FOR EVERY 5' RISE. — 7 INSTAL LED PEP MANUFACTURER S3SPECIFICA TION53. 75 TO BE AVAILABLE FROM' IGRSOBIGtFCORORBATIIONAL CGGPORATIGN P.O. BO% 9B , EARLY BPA. SC 2991G-009B ppOFES5j04, "S, 943-9115 MG) GAG -]974 WQA+��E A Aqs SIGN TE %T TO BE PREPARED ON PRESSURE SENSITIVE DECALS ALL SIGN REFLECTIVE CENTURY SCHOOLBOOK LETTER STYLE ON ti 3 O "• BROWN BACKGROUND. OR PROHIBITORY DECALS SHALL E Np. 2957] UNIVERSAL RED SLASH AND CIRCLE. s Exp. 03/31/03 a Q ]y ' `Tt CIVl� R q)F OF CAIiF� 'p �s a ReYlslpOS IPP—Eq pare REFERENCES Dare BENCHMARK SCALE '"`°°" °A """ ' At APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN DRAWING N0. A\ D�L REP TO DESCRIPTION:. CO. BENCHMRPK "OC -0073" PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APP EO TRAIL PLAN FOR: % CHISELED SQUARE IN TOP zzp EF HEADWALL Pte, DATE: u BY: ^^ ^^ `�-- BY: TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN 6277 —G as LEGATION: 6W COPNEP EL LAMING OEL NOTTE 6 RANCHO SANTA FE xDR P.C.E. N0. �9^ 5zj_ FATE: 2 A4 °ATE: 'I -OI ROAD iccu YN E %P. 21 cq ELEV 119.4]6 DATUM: USC6G3 V WORK PROJECT N0. SHEET 7 OF 8 RE IPEF 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 1'•50' 0 50 100 150 OF EAOWALL HoB 1xoNAr. LOCATION: SW CORNER EL CANING DE NORTE 6 RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD IE IT Y.I ELEV 119.176 AT UM: U.CSES �b pp.OFE5S7pA, yip �� A . pqS Fc 1 Exp. 03/31/03 m 47 )7 st CIVIL 4�` OF LALIF� PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OFI RECOMMENDED APjbiQV� DATE: II /9/ BY: �/1 An� BY:IIlI 1IHHII��BB.•'"'���W�� -IUJ ]N_nl R.L.E. NO. 2-9522— DATE: 21610 DATE: AYNE PASCO EXP. r- HYOROSEEO 9.O�E PAOTECTIOV $MO /giAIEL BAGS 000eeeee EROSION CONTROL 1 MANAGER JOHNGSILVERWOODIATR(858) 613-2990LT CONSTRUCTION 2. EQUIPMENT AND WORKERS FDA EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BE MADE AV AILABLE T ALL TIMES DURING THE INY SEASON. LL NECESSARY MATERIALS SHALL BE STOCNP ILEO ON SITE AT CONVENIENT LOCATIONS TO FACILItATE RAPID CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY DEVICES WHEN RAIN IS IMMINENT. 3. WITHOUT THEWAPPROVALNOFSTHELENGINEERINGETNSCECTDOR. ED W THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AFTER EACH RUN OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL. E. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A'DITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEAS ORE' S NAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEER DUE 0 UNCOMPLETED 6P AGING OPERATION OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MPY ARISE G. THE CONTRACCTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE A D SHALL TAKE ECEGEARY POE CANTIONG TO PREVNT PUBLIC TRESPASS ONTO AREAS WHEN IMPOUNDED WATER S CREATE AZAROOUS CONDITION. 7. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PROVIDE' PER THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN SHALL BE INCORPORATED HEREON. B. GRADED AREAS AROUND HE PROJECT PERIMETER MUST DRAIN AWAY FROM THE FACE OF SLOPE AT THE CONCLUSION OF EACH WORK DAY. 9, ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICE. SHONN SHALL BE IN PLACE THE PROBABILITY I RECAST EXCEEDSAFORTY PERCENTV 140%1 .DAB S LT IN AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL. 10. EFFECTTIVERCOVERAGE OF SLOPES 90% COVERAGE)RPRIOR TO NOVEMBER 15. 'HE SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH PUNCHED STRAW INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 35.023 OF THE EROSION 0 .EDI MENT CONTROL HANDBOOK OF HE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION. TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN 1 6277 -G Al �.0 Z GRAPHIC SCALE 1 "-40' 0 40 BO 120 t� DATE r PEF GAIN I - L J - tT f. 1 F I{{ _. 44 CARDIPPSANITATFONDISTRICr SEWER WER N O TE $ LEGAL SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 13 g BEREFT ND. A-O or -- A ORK T NE IN ACCOROSNCE Kt 1H HE SiAN0pg0 FIN SOUTH. RANGE 3 EST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. IN THE COUNTY OF BAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 13.5 2 DERAIL& 459.33 5 `( `qg SPECIFICATION PUBLIC M CONSTRUCTION (LATEST IONS P ry DIEGO SIANOARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS TB ®R@LINE MIA 31i3i INTA 2 M25.0f 4 `� t _ TO q0 CIFICa ­IONS FOR PUBLIC -1 CONSTAUCTION S(ADWTEp By THE SAN DIEGO PEGION'L STarvDaRps COMMITTEE). i E .1 OtEGO REGIONAL NOW 269 -451 OS LDE _. _ ®.1A RApA15 L ' +. 1 - r l_ G I + 1 _ AWING &ATASi EDITION D THE FOLLOWING SPECI Fa OVITRENCH .1O SHALL BE PER SDRSD NO B 4 BREAODRESS FOPTUNA RANCH ROAD, ENCINITAS CA. PERAfRTEE BENAMEL DEVELOPMENT LOPPOPATION AGE Sf YMF 186'11'28 63'19'13 300.00' 33].54' dgd69 5 CpJTEALIAE O HERNIAE xOTEO C. I AND CONDITIONS: 1fi885 DIN S7 BERNAPDO DRIVE X385 SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 9212] 63'(9'13 300.00' 331.54'° 0�-1 _ I FlSDINSi1 G1 ALL A L HAVE A 4' MI >tPEINLH LR�SHED ROCK BE (858) 613 -2990 L2 SV5�Yl9 213.39' (B) P C P AND A.S.S. T DING �� COS L21 ! y - I Il 4 I _ L I_,._ r FROM BOOM 0 IP L IxCHES MtNINUM A AGGPEGa -IL BE SANS, GRA V£ N TIRE FPEE- 85 WEST BERNAFO(1 DPI�EFX3B50PERTIES SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92127 BIG) 613 -2990 �. _ MATER AL eauivaLENT DF SOLLIU .11i1— WORK TO BE DONE S.D.R.S.D. a SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD urETUL TABLE 1' RGAD PCT. BE BOTT DRAWINGS ., -- I NVM ABOVE T PIPE SHALL CRUSN£D ROCK A,B 5. 30L I0 ITEM S.D.R,S,D.X SYMBOL QUANTITY ENCINITAS FIRE PROTECTION OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL MATJR W STATIIX.' E A BE USfO ONLY Mn6AE INVERT GRAPES ARE f% OR PROJECT BOUNDARY SLOPE 1 .._1 I &i T, ' t 1 R COMPLETION OF PIPE LAYING A W IN LINE WERS SEWER SEHVIOE LATERALS ANDL6TAUCTUgES SHALL PROPERTY LINES E %ISTING CONTOURS -- ..4U0- Rut i i j I BE EBTEO IN THE PRESENCE OF THE INSPECiOH P iESr HALL BE USED UNLESS OTHERWISE 351 SEWER MAIN _ B 6 F 4 I T ''� NA 4 0HE ITS POURf NIOFPP. C, C. SERER � SOI.B ALq SMgD NO. 0 IN PLACE MANHOLE PROPOSED MANHOLE L 9 -11 - B-Q-6- 3 EA` { POOAW 1-1 POUR FINISHED COMPLETE AT 11 AS1 MANHOLE BASES ARE ACLEPTASLG TOP FUBE PROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUT S -3 - 1 EA. L ♦ �.. 4 -L I I glrH a ELTOR 9vBTEMS HITH INSPECTOR'S PPPOYAL PROPOSED SEWER LATERAL 5-13 --04 3 EA. I I - .. -- _. __ i 5 iHF CONSTRUCTION OF d INCH SEWER LATERALS iERAlS PER sORSD NO s 13 AND S-14. LATERALS SHALL NOT Dt3CHARGE DIRECTLY INTO MaxiM1.E OWNER'S CERTIFICATE J } 'I -I r J r _ - I { B TAE CONSTRUCTION OF CBVLRETM ANCHOR NaLLS PER SORSO NO S i PE A 7. ALL MAZNINLPHINTERALS ONNEON THESE PANSMENCE WORK ON NGNCITYPHEGNTEOFSWAY WITHIN 60 OA YS AFTER I6SUANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND TO PURSUE SUCH WORK ACTIVELY ON EVERY NORMAL WORKING I SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IMUH COREq DAY UNTIL COMPLETED, IRRESPECTIVE AND INDEPENDENT OF ANY _ ICCC _ B. TNEEAFINNAAL LOCATION AND ELEVATION SEWER A. MA AND LATERALS SHALL BE OTHER WORK AEBOCIAT D WITH THIS ROJECT OR UNDER MY LONTRIX.. -- SLUMP � OFINDiutL AB B Li PLANS. tM 10 i NLE OMNER' (0 1 L_ iT _. ALI -1. CHANGES A SEWER .1. IN SHALL RO Y NE S ICI ENGINEE I NG PRIOR i0 SCMUSTANC£ FOR PUBLIC USE �erJP N.nvme. R - SCALE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT A W SA (�O 10 IL AREAS MUST BE COMPACTED 10 90% PRIOR TO PIPE INSTALLATION 11 Nii C OR SHALL HOTTER THE DISTRICT'S AS DNS IN ADVANCE OTOOISIBN AN HOA P<bs Nr RS1 `�� 59.✓ ��F4o/ C9 9& pqs / -OS - O12. ' OF GE rNN OF BEGINNING HORN RR) FIN! INSPECTION OF KOA I OJECi. PHONE N0. (J60) 633 -2]]0. LXCAVATxGINEERING SETAVICES _AtMENi FOR ANY a ION WITIIN EKISTING CITY RIGHTS -OF -WAY. 13. _ OR SHALL ANp HEREBIG EESS iUARANTEE All SNCS PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APPRpyED� Ny - OF HEADWALL LOCATION: SW CORNER EL CAMINO OEL OFRTIE WORKOBY TH OMNEB AND SMALL RfPA IR OR REPLACE ANY OA ILLASU TOGETHER WtiH ANY OTHER WORK WnICn MAY BEHOISPLatfO IN SO DOING THAT MAY PROVE DEFECTIVE tN MOAKMAN3HIP ANDE .-.IS XITHIN THE ONE vEAR PEPI00 FROM DATE: BY: M.M BY G { O DATE OF ALL EKCEPTINGIORNAFV NE A ANDTTEaREP TO THE ONI A IMWSUaL ABUSE OR NEGLECT ' 3 - i - 14. CONTRACTOR DNS. THE APPRW+PIATESSUAIEOPUTILITY SPE[IFICAND 11 ABOVE ALL tNG AND IIMWIIAATIOV ELEV 119.476 DATUM: USCQGS E%P._3_31 -03 0� PUBLIW C SEWER LTNES IN PURTIONS GF SEWER LATERALS LOCATED XITHIN PURL tC RIGHT OF NAV OR I5. OR SEWER LATERAL TABLE BEE I, 3 rats SHEET. IB 'AS BUILT' ORAMINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRION TO 5 FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK J HE ENOPER MAY BE = F 1 D UBLIREB TO GRADE AN ACCESS To AI AIN ANY PUBLIC HERB CONS SOTRUCTEO RI THI EABEMECESSI D NAY BE MEOUTAEO T DE 1111E TIONAL SSKGVTS TO MAINTAIN UAF PLSLrC OIS�CHaRGE PERMITS AND PLUMBING FEW TS TI 11 ION TO Sl- 19 NE rUTr IOLESSCTHANC 3M IFCHES IN Dia INSPFOTED oY CL.U.SEO PLAN: PUBLIC SEWER MAIN - ADAMS RUN g BEREFT ND. A-O or I STREET MPROMVV EMENT T AN DATA AND 452.E 1 13.5 2 DERAIL& 459.33 5 `( `qg 939.33 / ®R@LINE MIA 31i3i INTA 2 M25.0f 4 441.E 1 LwE 2X 4 LDE BEAAIMi IELTA H!DIIHLEfSiH �RBIAVB LDE _. _ ®.1A RApA15 L6TBM „6 fB.S' 4 443.22 3 5 *56.59 4 _ L1 Cf AGE Sf YMF 186'11'28 63'19'13 300.00' 33].54' dgd69 5 CpJTEALIAE Cf 55 Nii•1128 63'(9'13 300.00' 331.54'° tM'r.UE35 OSVE cOUATESTATEs Ha.LOxg0e0 SITE L2 SV5�Yl9 213.39' 1 CENTERSIE L21 SOPi'2809 60.96' 4 �$ 5Y sEKEr3 urETUL TABLE RGAD PCT. IE IE B BELOW, LENGTH EI.EV. ENCINITAS FIRE PROTECTION OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL MATJR W STATIIX.' @ MAM ]LENGTH 0 LIF1B SLOPE Clkg CND ELEV. TO W. .._._...._ �y' d -=�Inm /A�I�Oo WCINITYMAP (0 B GATE BENCHMARK SCALE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT APPROVALS DESCRIPTION: CO. BENCHMARK 'OC -0073 IN BOUARE IN TOP PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APPRpyED� OF HEADWALL LOCATION: SW CORNER EL CAMINO OEL ]IOx L 0 DATE: BY: M.M BY NORTE 6 RANCHO SANTA ROAD FE Ical a {AYH__ O R.L.E. N0._2$57j_ DATE: �L /°I GATE: 2'i'O( ELEV 119.476 DATUM: USCQGS E%P._3_31 -03 �w ^I Df ENCNITAS IS CFINED TO -A REVIEW ONLY AND DO NOT OE Y S ENGINEER DF WONORK, OF NY PESP ES ONSI BILITIES DP PROJEC' ppOFE6SIp4, A. ya< oa �NO. 29577 m E %p. 03/31/03 x Z A � BY: ApC � E. 295]] Gt�d DATE N SJ4��CIC Ulf" OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPAR N WING NO SEWER IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR: TPM 98 -272 ADAM'S RUN C STQ � 6 IDJELT ►�A^ ��/A � - _ _ PE 861 1 5rgf.% 4 452.E 1 13.5 2 2% 4 459.33 5 5' 9 939.33 / /B.5' 4 439.43 2 M25.0f 4 441.E 1 13.5' 2 2X 4 493.12 5 5' 4 448.]2 f fB.S' 4 443.22 3 5 *56.59 4 453.42 1 139' 2 2% d dgd69 5 5.16' 4 460.03 2 23.3' 4 453.13 STQ � 6 IDJELT ►�A^ ��/A � - _ _ PE 861