The URL can be used to link to this page

2000-6775 G/I/FINEERING SERVICES DEPART/ IT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Serrices Feld Operations Subdvision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) C] Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) District Support Services (--D) Office of the Director ( #1) Field Operations (FO) T Community Development-Current Planning O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: San Die uito Water District -En ineerin & Plannin Community Services— Parks & Beaches DATE: Regarding (Finance Number -(a DEPOSII/)aE�% TP /M Finance Number j DEPOSI'It P av " (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE A Transmitted as following: /sue Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map [[ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / !!9r Revised Other App ication: (T)pe) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff / Consul tant/CD /Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): v S HaAJ Pu e o ralna ater /Sewer/Frai Far cility) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / ew r Revised Grading Plan / Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / gEw oRevised Plan Change Description: (M lira' rosion Con ting & Irriga n) As Per... Our conversation 0 My /your inquiry Our Review Our Inquiry Our Approval For your... Corrqction p� Comment Signature >C] Information Uses Please return —` r Please call: ySy 3 if necessary Originator: Qi! Copies to: P 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Inter_Trans.dnc /03.02.99 1 of 1 CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 23,2001 TO: City Council Y� FORYOWRECORP VIA: Kerry Miller, City M e mr�n.rt FROM: Asir D. Archibald. of Engineering Services A.k.Mivlasih Maher, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of the Final Map, which conforms to Tentative Map No. 98 -240. Subject property is located at the northeast comer of Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street (APN: 254- 052- 12 &13, 254 - 101 -7 &24, 254 - 102 -51). Applicant: Graystone Homes Inc. BACKGROUND: On September 13, 2000, the City Council approved, subject to conditions, Tentative Map No. 98 -240, a tentative trap of subdivision creating forty -six single - family residential lots and with a 2.5 acre park. (See Exhibit A for Vicinity Map, see Exhibit B for final map). The tentative map is scheduled to expire on September 13, 2003. The map submittal has been deemed a timely filing in accordance with Section 66463.5b of the Subdivision Map Act. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The Final Environmental Impact Report that was prepared for the Tentative Map certified by the City Council on September 13, 2000 as part of Resolution 2000 -62. No significant adverse impacts were identified that could not be mitigated and the mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Final Map. ANALYSIS: The map itself has been examined and found to be technically correct and in compliance with State laws and City ordinances. All conditions of approval have been complied with prior to the expiration date. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Approve and accept on behalf of the public the irrevocable offers of dedication for public streets, public access and utility easements, and lot 47 in fee title for a public park site all as shown on the Final Map. 2. Reject the irrevocable offers of lot 48 in fee simple title (until after the park improvements are installed and accepted by the Community Services Department), as shown on the Final Map. 4. Approve the Final Map, which conforms to Tentative Map No. 98 -240, and authorize the City Treasurer and the City Clerk to sign the Final Map. 5. Authorize the recordation of the Final Map, which conforms to Tentative Map No. 98- 240 after the mandatory ten - calendar day appeal period. 98 -240 to Council.doc ATTACHMENT 'A' TM 98 -240 VICINITY MAP LEUCADIA OAKS PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES THIRD PLAN REVIEW January 22, 2002 RETURN PLAN CHECK WITH NEXT PLAN SUBMITTAL I ST 2nd 3rd Check # Check # Check # 1. Delete item SA6 entirely 2. Delete items SA5 entirely 3. Call out mainline in legend, and distinguish it from other lines 29. 7. 4. Show detailed subterranean drainage system and tie in to storm drain. Show detail as provided and provide appropriate sheet # for reference to LS Plans 5. Correct note regarding domestic water meter 52. IL 6. An isolation valve shall be installed prior to each valve, valve manifold or QC. 61. 13. 7. Berm / landscaping does not appear to be consistent with concept approved by planning Commission and City Council. See attached detail presented to the Planning Commission and City Council. Provide an elevation and detail showing that this condition has been met. 4 / -o 1, Leu Oaks -3rd Plan Check 01/22/02 LEGEND: NTS I. TOT LOT EDGE PER DEATIL H SHEET 3. 2. TOT -LOT SURFACE PER DETAIL H, SHEET 3. 3. 9095 COMPACTED 5UB -6RADE 4. 4 OZ. FILTER FABRIC BY TG- MIRAFI, PRODUCT #:157- 140- NG -15, OR APPROVED EQUAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL OVERLAP ENDS OF FABRIC 3' -O" MIN AND STAPLE TO SECURE IN PLACE (STAPLES • &" O.C). 5. 4" 51N6LE WALL PERFORATED PIPE WITH POLYESTER KNITTED FILTER SOCK BY A05 (61(4.253.b939), OR APPROVED EQUAL. b. I'XI' TRENCH CONTINUOUS BAGKFILLED WITH PEA GRAVEL. i/7 AM • WWC"Y MAY Ate. December 26, 2001 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA. 92024 Re. Bay Laurel Tract No 98 -240 Letter of Permission for Grading We are the owners or have interest in, the property adjacent to the above reference project. We hereby grant Greystone Homes Inc. permission to construct the improvements as shown on City of Encinitas drawing number 6675 -G sheets 44 and 45. Sincerely, A ReVi5 #0 4 b� d' + 94 /0 / William M. and Lisa S. Lafferty APN: 254- 102 -26 Site Address: 1456 Sanford Lane Encinitas DA. 92024 iz /zd /o December 26, 2001 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA. 92024 Re. Bay Laurel Tract No 98 -240 Letter of Permission for Grading We are the owners or have interest in, the property adjacent to the above reference project. We hereby grant Greystone Homes Inc. permission to construct the improvements as shown on City of Encinitas drawing number 6675 -G sheets 44 and 45. Sincerely, William M. and Lisa S. Lafferty APN: 254- 102 -26 Site Address: 1456 Sanford Lane Encinitas DA. 92024 December 26, 2001 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas CA. 92024 Re: Bay Laurel Tract NO 98 -240 Letter of Permission for Grading We are the owners or have interest in, the property adjacent to the above reference project. We hereby grant Greystone Homes Inc. permission to construct the improvements as shown on City of Encinitas drawing number 6675 -G sheets 44 -45. Sincerely, 7 B/ Hall APN: 254- 102 -22 Site Address: 1462 Sanford Lane, Encinitas CA 92024 -1501 Mailing Address: 1462 Sanford Lane, Encinitas CA 92024 -1501 City of Encinitas May 8, 2001 Mr. Chris Earl Greystone Homes, Inc. 5780 Fleet Street, Ste. 300 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Traffic Fees — Greystone, TM 98 -240 Dear Mr. Earl: Enclosed please find your check for $41,446 tendered to satisfy the subject project's traffic mitigation fee requirements. Based upon consultation with the City Manager and City Attorney, it was determined that the subject project was not in the "pipeline" and is therefore subject to the new traffic fee schedule adopted by the City Council by Ordinance 2000 -08 at their January 17, 2001 meeting. The new fees became effective on March 19, 2001. Should you have any questions, please give me a call at (760) 633 -2771. Sincerely , & 8 LU4 Alan D. Archibald, P.E. Director of Engineering Services TEL 760 - 633 -2600 / FAX 760633 -2627 505 S_ Vulcan .Avenuc. Encinira%. California 72024 -3633 TDD 760-6+33 -2700 0 M0CbdPWW GREYSTONE HOMES, INC 5780 FLEET ST., STE., 300 CARLSBAD, CA ,92006 e , ^PArTOTVE.CITY.OF ENQINITAS ORDER OF RnRTV 11NF PunricAKiN vnrro 437i' DATE.Marc:h 14,2001 220 41,446.00 ** m SIX DOLLARS AND lIl Birk of America CqE o**een C* Los MW e20. - r. 524 Fb .' S**eb Mananine Level l - ' Loa Mg *IA CA 9 71 - FORtraffic m gar;ori fee5�bav�j 11''0843 -2 Lnm '1: L 2 2000 &6 it: 44 209111 ?0:46 2u' GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. I LENNAR HOMES 5780 Fleet Street Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 9200E Office 760-000.7700 Fax 760-0047776 March 16, 2001 Mr. Alan Archibald Director of Engineering City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Greystone TM 98 -240 Dear Mr. Archibald: Attached please find our check in the amount of $41,446 to cover Traffic Mitigation Fees for the referenced project. Based on input received from Gary Lee, the fees were calculated as follows: $901 /residential unit times 46 residential units = $41,446. Condition G13 of our TM requires the payment of Traffic Mitigation Fees. Under State law and the Encinitas Municipal Code (Section 23.94.020), we can pay these fees at the building permit stage, or during subdivision processing as a condition of our final map. We are electing to pay these fees in full at the final map processing stage. Our final map has completed two plan checks and has been submitted for a third plan check review. Very truly yours, Greystone Homes F, cc: Mike Levesque Greg Garratt Attachment OCT. 1.2601 10 :26ftt9 GREYSTONE HOMES NO.054 P.2i2 ISh/ (G V, 9/20/01 xt Bill, h Kati Below is a partial list of errata and issues concerning the proposed wall replacement based on the drawings you provided. 1. A drawing signed by Chris Earl on 4/2/01 shows the relocation of the wall between our property and the Hall's. The wall is to include a section that jogs to the North to tie in to the Hall's existing fence. This is not included in the current drawings. The Hall's should be provided the opporttmty to review this portion of the revised design. 2. The drawings show a 6'-8" max wall height (as measured from the East side). Based on the current wall height and grade at the Iocation of our deck, the wall must be approximately 85 feet high. We would be agreeable to raising the grade on our side. 3. The southerly 111 feet of our property is labeled "Pedestrian area only — no traffic allowed" on the drawing. This portion of our property was used as a driveway in the past and may become a driveway in the future should we decide to split our lot. This label should be removed and the design adjusted to not limit fitture use of this portion of our property. The drawing also lacks a description of the type of footing proposed for this section. 4. The drawings do not include the new /proposed "Top of Wall" profile. This detail should be added with particular attention to the height from our existing deck. Our concern is for the safety of our children given the newly increased vertical drop to the West of our property. We request a miniaurm wall height above the deck of 40 ". 5. The northernmost survey point (125.86) of the East side existing grade profile is incorrect. 6. The letter signed by Chris Earl dated 3/28/01 calls for drainage holes through the wall to address subsurface drainage. Such drainage is absent in the drawings. If an alternate drainage system is proposed, details should be provided including the location of any drainage outlet. 7. According to the letter signed by Chris Earl dated 3/28/01, Greystone has committed to having an engineer /surveyor prepare the documentation necessary to adjust the easement with the Hall's. This should be provided prior to the proposed wall relocation in case there is any disagreement on the part of the Hall's. 8. I am concerned the footing design is inadequate given the anticipated difficulty in properly / compacting the soil on the cast side of the wall. I would like to discuss this matter with the engineer. 9. The draft letter of consent says the "existing deck may be disturbed." Given the proximity of the deck to the wall, this is severely understated. Prior to approving any wall design, I would like a comprehensive plan for the deck. This issue should be discussed in person. 10. The Letter of Consent should include language that states that Greystone will replace any damaged landscaping, electrical, irrigation, or structures (including the deck, swimming pool, South -west driveway, etc.) in kind and in a timely manner. This includes a number of mature Bougainvilleas along the Southern portion of the wall and a large Bougainvillea "tree" that is the landmark of our property and a number of large King Palms near the wall. nk you, �,uSr+►asv- — tS vN' ,v - = ck,Ls� C,A� -._ �'vr s"c.v- 72 C.SS cam- w�*u- ��.o►o� cxxzuT G9/1- �a0>c� — w,.4.�T� C-�w wru -S✓) wJ+aT� - 5Z-L. — 5X31 W oux,- c)PCL c.o - Q d-4.. - X330 �'resw�� tti IM" - 1. r7 �35'5 - &23 -5-t:3 )" -14+- (a33o 3/8/01 ENCINITAS BAY LAUREL BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT CONTACT LIST 1 -A MIKE LAFFETY 1 -B BILL & SALLY GW HALL 1456 SANFORD LANE 1462 SANFORD LANE ENCINITAS, CA 92024 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 FAX:858- 526 -5631 760- 753 -7067 760 - 944 -6330 2 THOMAS HARDEBECK 1540 SURF RD. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 760 - 436 -6046 3 RONALD E, JOHNSON 900 S. COAST HWY 101 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 760 - 753 - 8100- EXT107 NEALPATEL 8870 BRADWELL PL. APT, 206 FISHERS, IN 46038 773 - 907 -9243 CELL 773 -251 -2740 HOME 317 - 842 -7544 W RK. 317- 274 -1840 PGR. 317- 212 -7309 FAX 317- 278 -7793 KEN VALLONE 1549 N. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 760 - 753 -2741 FAX 436 -2794 PGR. 649 -6778 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California J County of n O- J ss. 0J6WXh'2t9: =1 , before me, Data f personally appeared DONNA 8LIRMS _ Comn itiaion • 1238625 Notary Public • California' San Dial county My Comm- Expires Oct 19, 2081 Place Notary Seal Adove B1rrtS officer li 9 vane Namgs)ol Sgnsgsll ` v `proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose namZ!()(3hllpl subscribed to the witA instrument and acknowledged to me a h She/tMLy executed the same in is they authorized capacity(** -) an that by his Mbritht•'ic signature(* on the instrument the personN, or the entity upon behalf of which the person() acted. executed the instrument. WITNE S my hand and official seal. i SigndWre 01 Notary Pudbc OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, It may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages Signer(s) Other Than Named Above. Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: Individual e Top of thumb nere C Corporate Officer — Ttle(s): ❑ Partner — — Limited — General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: 0 1997 National Notary Association • 9350 Oe Solo Ave. PO eon 2402 - Chalsworlh. CA 91313 -2402 Prod No 5907 Reorder Call Ton -Free 1.a00- 616682] MAY. 7.2001 2 :19PM GR0TONE HOMES San Diego Division LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL NO. 131 P.1 /7 To: Building Department From: Craig hanks, Proj. Coordinator 505 South Vulcan Ave. City Of Encinitas Date: March 28, 2001 Ca 92024 fax 2131 a Reference: Attn: Duane Thompson Bay Laurel Transmitted via: ❑ Mail ❑ Pick Up ❑ UPS Next Day / 2"° Day ❑ Messenger/ Courier ® fax No, of Copies I Description 1 Letter of intent for Arborist 1 Letter of Mitigation compliance 1 Grant deed with legal description Transmitted for your: ❑ Aug' p ❑ File / Information ❑ Signature ® For Review and Comment Remarks: Cc: Chris Earl, Dan 0' Rurke, Mike Butcher 5780 Fleet Street, Suite 300, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 s Phone: (760) 804.7700 ■ Fax (760) 8047717 * 9U10. chnnW1enner.mm aPer Your Request 05 -07 -01 03:32PM FROMRBF -ALTON TION +8494728373 T -465 P 01/04 F -720 me . M CONSULTING PWNNING ■ OE5,3N ■ CONSTRw CTION Date: May 7, 2001 To: Duane Thompson From: Ray Thatcher Subject: Maravu - Tract 98 -306 Total pages (including Cover Sheet) MESSAGE: 4 FAX COVER SHEET JN 10- 101080 Company: City of Encinitas FAX: (760) 633 -2818 Department: Land Development Phone/Ext.: (949) 855 -3607 FAX: (949) 472 -8373 The open space easement through Lots 31 and 32 was revised. Attached is a plot and traverses of the affected area. Please review. Thanks, Ray Thatcher H \pdma 101010501offi cTeu D."TMmq.mOdUr"M -p0 Tn1S DOCUMENT CONTANS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NO PORTION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE EXTRACTED OR REPRODUCED FOR ANY PURPOSES WITHOUT THE ADVANCE PERMISSION OF RBF CONSULTING. It mare are any Ru9aeon5. or ❑ you do nm rerone al oocumanW. Piense Lail u5 14725 Aton Parkway. Irvine CA 92616.2027 • P O. Boa 57057. Irving, CA 9261 9- 70 57 a 949 472 3505 a FAx 949 472 5373 Once located W ougmuf Cago s. Arizona s Nevada a www R6F com t,35--e - SGo - B15-7 SB &O Inc. Attention: Michael Butcher: From uane Thompson 760- 633 -2783 May 17, 2001 Items 1 through 6 are to remain on the title sheet. Items 7 through 11 can be combined into item Number 12. Item number 6 needs to be signed and recorded. We don't have it in the covenant package here at the City. Item number 12 — the one you mentioned that you still have needs to be signed by Greystone and the City Planning Department before recording. When you get the recording information on the Hall / Lafferty Grant deed fax it to me and I will insert it on the legals on the covenants that I have and call Chris to get them recorded. I will be off work tomorrow. J^Duane Thompson - Greystone Home irchase Agreement/Reimbursement Agr, ant age From: Patrick Murphy To: Glenn Sabine Date: 5/14/01 3 50P Subject: Greystone Homes - Purchase Agreement/Reimbursement Agreement Glenn: Greg Garratt talked to me today to fill me in on the purchase and reimbursement agreements. I previously told Greystone that I felt those agreements should be done prior to final map. (Note: the conditions of approval don't specifically say when the agreements should be done.) Greg said that the purchase agreement should be done prior to final map, however, the reimbursement agreement may not be. think that Engineering was tentatively going to the City Council meeting on May 23, 2001, for authorization for final map. If we need to talk about this (the timing of the agreements and the final map), we should talk soon, and I guess determine whether or not the final map should be pushed to another Council date. The discussion should involve Engineering, Planning and Community Services. Thanks. Pat Murphy CC: Dave VYgginton, Duane Thompson, Masih Maher, Phillip Cotton, Sandy Holder, Tom Curriden ATTACHMENT B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY PROJECT NO. 98 -240 OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS Portion of said lots 11,12 and 13 are to be maintained free of obstructions and vegetation limited in height to three feet from grades as shown on City of Encinitas Grading Plan 6775 G for vehicular sight distance as shown hereon VINDICATES LANDSCAPE AREA TO BE MAINTAINED FOR HICULAR SIGHT DISTANCE. I � W .1:54' 2 ZXjk ,h N�Z �A H ,7 Qv N75'1J'J4If 1J1.00' N75'13'J4 1p7.50' 1 60.0i0' 71.00' I 9, 692.88 0 S. F. 12 1 5, 9J7.56 S F. 1 25.00,�I ^$�% V >1 L-2G 10' I N °- 7,015.J2 S.F. �f0'3J31�fR� h �i N� NI 1 N `r 29.78' d +mss •�i. ; i w ay. 2 5 LEK M74056'42 Ar 636.75' A(74'56'42 � - 4 ;156 J 82721' R 9 N745642 It 689.,3 3' SANFORD STREET ACTION OF THE DIRECTORS OF GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. TAKEN WITHOUT A MEETING In accordance with the provisions of Section 141(f) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware the following action was taken by unanimous consent of the members of the Board of Directors of Greystone Homes. Inc. without a meeting: RESOLVED, that Mike Levesque is hereby elected President. San Diego Division of this Corporation. RESOLVED, that Mike Levesque, acting alone be and is hereby authorized on behalf of this Corporation to enter into contracts for services, purchase materials and supplies, execute applications, government and quasi - government permits and licenses. obtain FHA and VA approvals, enter into written contracts with City and County agencies (including school districts) preliminary to or concurrent with the subdivision of real property owned, or under contract to purchase by sale agreement or option, which contracts are a part of said subdivision process, execute documents or instruments burdening this Corporation's real property as a part of the subdivision process, including but not limited to Subdivision Improvement Agreements, easements, rights-of -way, licenses, covenants. conditions and reservations ( "CC &R's "), annexation agreements, applications for Department of Real Estate public reports. title company indemnification agreements relating to Corporation real property, public and quasi- public utility service applications and contracts, temporary entry agreements, contracts for the sale or rental of this Corporation's residential real property when such real property is improved with a housing unit and is a part of a residential subdivision which latter authority includes the authority to execute escrow instructions, Grant Deeds and other instruments of conveyance, and all other contracts involving this Corporation's ordinary course of business EXCEPT he shall have no authority to borrow money, purchase real property, sell real property other than as hereinabove permitted or execute surety bonds on behalf of this Corporation. RESOLVED FURTHER, that the authority herein conferred shall remain in force until revocation thereof by the Board of Directors of this Corporation. Dated: February 11. �db0 Marc Chansman /^ Robert W. arcin TO: City Council CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 23,2001 VIA: Kerry Miller, City Manager FROM: XLAlan D. Archibald, Director of Engineering Services A,k.,0Masih Maher, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of the Final Map, which conforms to Tentative Map No. 98 -240. Subject property is located at the northeast corner of Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street (APN: 254 -052- 12 &13, 254 - 101 -7 &24, 254- 102 -51). Applicant: Graystone Homes Inc. BACKGROUND: On September 13, 2000, the City Council approved, subject to conditions, Tentative Map No. 98 -240, a tentative map of subdivision creating forty -six single - family residential lots and with a 2.5 acre park. (See Exhibit A for Vicinity Map, see Exhibit B for final map). The tentative map is scheduled to expire on September 13, 2003. The map submittal has been deemed a timely filing in accordance with Section 66463.5b of the Subdivision Map Act. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The Final Environmental Impact Report that was prepared for the Tentative Map certified by the City Council on September 13, 2000 as part of Resolution 2000 -62. No significant adverse impacts were identified that could not be mitigated and the mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Final Map. ANALYSIS: The map itself has been examined and found to be technically correct and in compliance with State laws and City ordinances. All conditions of approval have been complied with prior to the expiration date. ATTACHMENT 'A' TM 98 -240 VICINITY MAP NEW i� RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions: Approve and accept on behalf of the public the irrevocable offers of dedication for public streets, public access and utility easements, and lot 47 in fee title for a public park site all as shown on the Final Map. 2. Reject the irrevocable offers of lot 48 in fee simple title (until title of said lot is transferred to the City of Encinitas), as shown on the Final Map. 4. Approve the Final Map, which conforms to Tentative Map No. 98 -240, and authorize the City Treasurer and the City Clerk to sign the Final Map. 5. Authorize the recordation of the Final Map, which conforms to Tentative Map No. 98- 240. 01,0 98 -240 to Council.doc PLANNING COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING NOTES February 12, 2001 Greystone Homes Final Map Issues Planning Commission Subcommittee: Lester Bagg, Adam Birnbaum Applicant: Chris Earl, Dan O'Rourke City: Patrick Murphy, Staff The Planning Commission Subcommittee reviewed two issues: 1. Pad elevations. The pad elevations have increased on certain lots, which impact the overall approved building heights. As conditioned, the Planning Commission restricted the measurement of building height to the established pad elevations as shown on the approved Design Review Site Plan. The Final Map grading plan identifies an increase in pad elevations on certain lots. Most of the lots with increased pad elevations were minor and below the approved 26' maximum building height as identified on the Planning Commission Design Review approval for the homes. The Planning Commission reviewed and approved the following: Lot # Suggested Solutions that Comply with PC Approvals (26' max. building height) I Install yard drain in front yard. 3 Flip home. 7 Install yard drain in front yard. 10 Install yard drain in comer side yard. 17 Install yard drain in comer side yard. 18 Install yard drain in front yard. 23 Flip home. 25 Install yard drain at the southwest end of the panhandle. 38 Flip home. 42 Flip home. Notes: 1. Planning Commission Subcommittee approved the homes to be flipped and had no problems with the limited use of yard drains as described below. 2. When approved, yard drains shall be located in the front or side yards allowing surface drainage to cross the lot to the drain. The goal is to allow as much surface drainage on each lot as possible before it enters the yard drain. psm /cdd/f /greystone /pc subcom mtg notes 021201 �� 3. Some of the pad elevations shown on the Final Map have been lowered from the approved Design Review Site Plan. The maximum building height allowed shall be measured from the lowest pad elevation as identified on the Design Review Site Plan or the Final Map Grading Plan. 2. Retaining wall(s) located along the northeast boundary. The Final Map identifies a new retaining wall along the northeast boundary. The wall is needed to construct the private road improvements for "D" Street. The Subcommittee discussed different solutions. The Subcommittee expressed concerns with the future pedestrian access, which Greystone Homes is required to provide. The Subcommittee wants to make sure that the overall solution allows for a future pedestrian access that is feasible and practical to install. The Subcommittee requested that the applicant provide a solution that addresses the issues discussed. No additional meeting is necessary. Staff will communicate the solution to each subcommittee member for comments. psm/cdd/f /greystone /pc subcom mtg notes 021201 rA CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMORANDUM Date: October 18, 2000 TO: Sandy Holder, Community Development Director avid Wigginton, Community Services Director L/Masih Maher, Senior Civil Engineer Kathy Weldon, Management Analyst Garret Williams, Environmental Health Enforcement Officer FROM: trick Murphy, Project Manager SUBJECT: Drainage System within Neighborhood Park Northeast Corner of Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street The drainage system within the future neighborhood park located at the northeast comer of Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street consists of a detention facility and biofilter facility. The day -to -day flows within the drainage area will be directed to the biofilter for the purpose of cleansing the water prior to exiting the site to the west side of Vulcan Avenue. Staff provided the following design suggestions for the biofilter: 1. The location of this facility to be on the north boundary and/or east boundary adjacent to Lot 46. 2. The facility should be heavily vegetated, possibly with riparian/wetland plants. (Note: Based on comments received through the Draft EIR process, Rochelle Campana described the biofilter as a `vegetative filter strip." The attachment to her letter referred to it as a "grassy swale and sand filter." According to the publication "Start at the Source" by Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association, the biofilter is a vegetated swale with either turfgrass or wetland vegetation, depending on site conditions, such as, slopes and groundwater table.) 3. The facility needs to be fenced. 4. Based on the anticipated flows, the biofilter would need to be 100' in length. It was recommended that the biofilter be extended in length to enhance water cleansing. Is] ' PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX(858)259 -4812 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Attached fl,r, -j5t-q5 -2.40 Date: w `I Job No. 7 7 Attn: �� iY1 �� 7 Re: GiiS1" °NL— 6L Copies Date No. I Description o�L//2- V 00 2v9 n e� 612-1 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: • For approval • For your use • As requested ❑ For review and comment REMARKS: � ' — Ti(iw. /`x'10 ,/r Zf . -to 6L i�rJ 1 Qkap&� W',u1��. 04 - ��1 acs Signed June 21, 2000 Mr. Patrick Murphy City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, Ca 92024 ASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 J PE 777 WAYNE A. PASCO R.C.E. 29577 RE: GREYSTONE HOMES STORMWATER TREATMENT AND DRAINAGE Dear Mr. Murphy: The issue of treatment of stormwater was raised in conjunction with the Greystone Homes Major Subdivision at the June 15, 2000 Planning Commission hearing. This issue centered around the use and location of a biofilter, in this case a "grassy Swale ", for treatment of pollution in urban stormwater originating from the subdivision. We understand the public's concern for their health and safety and for the health and safety of their children. I will address this concern by describing what a biofilter is, how it works and why this system is safe for use in a park setting. There seems to be some general confusion about what a biofilter really is. Biofilters (grassy swales) are highly effective systems that fit well into neighborhood parks because of their natural features. Contrary to the sentiments expressed by several speakers at the June 15, 2000 Planning Commission hearing, biofilters treat and remove pollutants. They are not a collection or disposal site for hazardous materials and pollutants. Biofilters are comprised completely of natural components, but are also specifically designed, engineered and constructed to optimize the efficiency of four unique stormwater treatment mechanisms. These removal mechanisms are sedimentation, filtration, sorption and bioconversion. Figure 1 depicts plan and section views of a typical biofilter. Stormwater runoff enters the biofilter channel and is dispersed over a heterogeneous slope of rocks. This slows the flow down and drops out the larger particles in the storm flow. This is where the majority of sedimentation occurs and should be inspected twice a year to ensure that a build up of excess non - biodegradable material does not occur. Flow continues through a flow spreader and onto the grassy portion of the biofilter where the stormwater infiltrates downward into a constructed soil consisting of granular fill, compost, and topsoil, until it reaches the perforated underdrain 30 inches below the grass surface. The resulting treated water is then piped to a standard storm drain (to the railroad R/W in the case of the Greystone project). The Swale is lined with grass mainly to provide erosion control and slow down the flow of the stormwater. The subsurface environment is where the majority of the treatment occurs. City/Murphy/PE777 June 20, 2000 As the contaminated runoff flows downward through the soil pores, the remaining suspended solids are filtered out. At the same time, the dissolved contaminants are removed by sorption (absorption and adsorption) onto the organic (carbonaceous) molecules in the compost and topsoil. The trapped dissolved and suspended solids are then metabolized by the consortium of bacteria living in the compost and converted into carbon dioxide, water and trace elements for plant uptake (NO3, P2O5, Ca, Mg, Fe, etc) .2 In a biofiltration swale performance study performed by Kulzer and Homer et a13, biofiltration removed over 80% of total suspended solids (TSS), 60% of particulate Heavy Metals and over 70% Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). Another report cites the TSS removal for grass swales at 93 %, higher than that of any other stormwater BMP.° Grass swales are nationally recognized as a stormwater treatment best management practice (BMP) for their record of effectiveness and safety. One report evaluating the effectiveness of Stormceptor -type devices had this to say about stormceptors and biofilters. "Effective pollutant removal is considered equivalent to that provided by public domain controls — grassy swales and sand filters. Furthermore, the demonstrated treatment performance of these technologies (grassy swales and sand filters) can be used as a relative measure against which to assess the acceptability of performance data from other (proprietary) treatment technologies. ,5 Based on the efficiency of pollutant removal provided by these systems and the permeability of the constructed soils, it is my opinion that biofilters do not pose a significant risk to the public health. However, additional safeguards can be implemented if deemed appropriate, such as including protective landscaping along the perimeter of the biofilter to minimize access and exposure to park goers and children. It should also be noted that the size of the grassy swale needed to treat "first flush" flows from the project will encompass approximately 300 square feet (3 feet by 100 feet) of the Greystone proposed park site. If you have any comments or questions regarding the above, please feel free to call me at (858)259 -8212. Very Truly Yours, PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. Tim Ross, RCE 56068 BS Civil Engineering, MS Environmental Engineering 'IR/tr Attachments (1) City/Murphy/PE777 June 20, 2000 References: 1) 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design Manual, Vol. /, Maryland Department of the Environment, Draft Copy, Dec. '99, Chapter 3, pg. 3.43 2) Chemical Fate and Transport in the Environment, H.F. Hemond and E.J. Fechner, Academic Press, 1994, Pg. 107 3) Biofltration Swale Performance, Recommendations, and Design Considerations, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle. Louise Kulzer and Richard Homer et al, Publication 657, October 1992 4) 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design Manual, Vol. 2, Maryland Department of the Environment, Draft Copy, Dec. '99, Appendix D -5, pg. D -5.2 5) Stormwater Management in Washington State, Volume V, Runoff Treatment BMP's, Public Review Draft, October 1999, Pg. 190 6) Preliminary Hydrology Report and Detention Analysis for Greystone Homes, Inc., Prepared by Pasco Engineering, Inc., July, 1999 06/27/00 15:46 FAX JUN -21 -2090 09:23 Zao2 P. 04 FIGURE 1: TYPICAL BIOFILTER PLAN AND SECTION VI&WS W W W W W W W i W I1R W V W iY 1t �W�WW�W ♦ W W j W W �' W �► W W W W • W W W Y 4 W � W W PLAN VIEW z To a meow. r 157 i / (y May 9, 2000 PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858)259.8212 FAX(858)259 -4812 Mr. Greg Garratt 401 B Street, Suite 2400 San Diego, CA 92101 -2400 RE: RESPONSE TO GREYSTONE DRAFT EIR COMMENTS Dear Greg: PE 777 WAYNE A. PASCO R.C.E. 29577 This letter is in response to Ogden's comments for public response to the Greystone Homes Project draft EIR. We reviewed the report with particular attention to drainage issues. The major comment we have is with the recommendation of utilizing a "rain garden" for treatment of stormwater drainage from the project site. On page 2 -2, Ogden makes additions to the Surface Water Quality Mitigation Measures based on public comment. The new text requires the applicant to construct a bioretention structure (i.e., a rain garden) and a detention structure within the proposed park to handle internal site runoff and external runoff from Sanford Street and Vulcan Avenue. On May 4, 2000, Mike Smith (Pasco Engineering, Inc.) and I met with Pat Murphy, Masih Maher and Kathy Stone (BMP Planner) of the City of Encinitas to discuss Greystone Homes Project drainage issues. The main topic was the use of a grassy swale for bioretention on the project site instead of rain garden. For further clarification on the subject of bioretention, please refer to my letter to the City of Encinitas, RE: Greystone Drainage Issues, dated April 28, 2000. Based on that letter and the discussion at the meeting, the City agreed that the use of properly designed grassy Swale is the recommended option for stormwater bioretention and treatment. Therefore, we recommend that wherever "rain garden" appears in the EIR, it shall be replaced by "grassy swale". In addition, we believe that drainage flowing north on Vulcan should not be diverted to the project site because none of the proposed subdivision building lots front on Vulcan and the additional flow could create saturated soil conditions on the park site making it unusable. This was a comment made by Masih at the May 4'", meeting. Two other issues of note that are not as time sensitive as the above include: Greg Garratt/ PE777 May 9, 2000 Comment 23 -a) There is no need to divert stormwater flows to the west side of the RR tracks since NCTD has signed off on the proposed drainage improvement plans on the east side of the tracks that Greystone is obligated to implement. Comment 93 -g) We need clarification of the phrase, "concrete wasting procedures and control of tracking soil offsite to surrounding areas." If you have any comments or questions regarding the above, please feel free to call me at (858)259 -8212. Very Truly Yours, Pasco Engineering, Inc. Tim Ross Project Engineer RCE 56068 TR/V PASCO ENGINEERING, INC 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (619) 259 -8212 FAX (619) 259 -4812 April 28, 2000 Mr. Patrick Murphy City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, Ca 92024 RE: GREYSTONE HOMES DRAINAGE ISSUES Dear Mr. Murphy: PE 777 WAYNE A. PASCO R.C.E. 29577 Several issues regarding drainage and treatment of stormwater have been raised in conjunction with the Greystone Homes Subdivision in Leucadia. In particular, Rochelle Campana, at the request of the Community Park Council, raised several points which we believe warranted additional investigation and comment. Before each response I have included the excerpt from the letter to which the response pertains and its location within the letter. Rochelle Campana's letter in its entirety is attached for completeness. In addition, we have attached a copy of the full stormwater report, "Investigation of Structural Control Measures for New Development, November 1999 ", prepared for Sacramento Storrnwater Management Program by Larry Walker and Associates, Inc. that is referenced in the letter by Rochelle Campana. Statement 1 (Page 1 Paragraph 2 Line 5)• ... there is no effort to limit the total volume of runofffrom the site, only the rate at which it is discharged into the downstream surface waters is being controlled. It is my understanding that the average annual runoff from the developed site could be as much as ten times greater than what currently leaves the property. " Response: The storm flow analysis for the property in its current state yielded a maximum off -site flow rate at 20.81 cubic feet per second (cfs) for the 100 -year design storm. The maximum off -site flow rate during the 100 -year storm for the project as proposed yields a flow rate of 23.41 cfs.1 The difference between the runoff for the site as existing and proposed is 2.6 cfs or 11%, not 10 times, or 1000% as stated by the letter's author. To put this figure into perspective, the additional amount of storm water that would run off the proposed site during the worst storm in the next 100 years as opposed to the site as Patrick Murphy/PE777 April 28, 2000 existing is 6,230 cubic feet (cf) which is less than the amount of water in an average residential swimming pool (10,000 co. Statement 2 (Page 2 Paragraph 3 Line 4)' "Stormceptor in particular, demonstrated Total Suspended Solids removal rates as low as 26 %. (See attachment). That is, over 70% of the suspended solids will pass through the device, along with all dissolved pollutants, organic matter, silt and clays. " Response: The manufacturers of Stormceptor, CSR America, Inc., disputed the results from the referenced studyz because salt from a salted sandpile (used for road deicing) was entering the device and decreasing the settling characteristics of the device. In three other reported studies the TSS removal ranged from 53% to 93% removal, including 43% of all oil and grease, and 21 -51% of heavy metals reported .3 Statement 3 (Page 2 Paragraph 4 Linel) "The Sacramento study concludes that these devices (oil /grit separators), as a whole, are not effective at reducing the pollutants commonly found in urban runoff. I3 of the 14 devices tested, were unacceptable and will not be approved by the Sacramento Planning Department for future development. This means that the problem can not (sic) be solved by replacing the Stormceptor with another, more effective, stormwater control device. " Response: The basis used for approval or denial of structures in the above referenced report was performance versus existing public domain controls, e.g. grassy swales and sand filters. The report goes on to state, "Effective pollutant removal is considered equivalent to that provided by public domain controls — grassy swales and sand filters. Furthermore, the demonstrated treatment performance of these technologies (grassy swales and sand filters) can be used as a relative measure against which to assess the acceptability of performance data from other (proprietary) treatment technologies. Of the fourteen proprietary devices evaluated, none have adequate data at this time to recommend outright acceptance ".4 The above statements do not infer that these devices have no value, but simply that they are not as effective as grassy swales and sand filters. We believe that an oil/grit separator, when used in combination with other structural and non- structural BMP's such as in our case, is a valuable component of a combined treatment system. The current stormwater treatment design includes four individually recognized structural and non - structural BMP's.5 These are: 1) increased infiltration from narrow roadway Patrick Murphy/PE777 April 28, 2000 design, 2) installation of an oil/grit separator at the collection point on the east boundary of the park, 3) use of a dry extended detention pond to provide safe conveyance of the 100 -year storm event and 4) open channel flow along the east side of the railroad tracks up to the final discharge point. Both the detention pond and railroad channel, while not qualifying as stand -alone treatment structures, do confer many of the benefits of biofiltration systems such as plant uptake of pollutants, filtration, sedimentation and soil sorption without the negative aspects of bioretention systems. We believe that the proposed BMP's work together to create an effective stormwater treatment and conveyance system for a small residential subdivision such as Greystone. Statement 4 (Page 2 Paragraph 5 Line 1): "I would like to suggest another approach, which I believe can help mitigate both the additional runoff volume and the degradation of water quality. It is a concept known as Low Impact Development (LID) Design, Better Site Design, Open Space design or Conservation design. It views stormwater as an asset to be managed, not a waste for disposal. LID maximizes the use of the developed landscape to store, infiltrate and detain runoff by the use of: • Narrower streets and shorter driveways • Spreading stormwater runoff over pervious areas • Bioretention structures such as rain gardens and vegetative filter strips • Open channels rather than curbs and gutters • Clustering development to shorten roads and increase open space" Response: The project as proposed does incorporate some elements of LID design such as lot configuration in conjunction with the park location and narrow street design. By moving the subdivision lots to the East End of the property, the developer was able to offer nearly 20% of the total subdivision to open space in the form of a community park. The park area is situated at the furthest downstream location of the subdivision and acts as an environmental buffer as described in the reference articles.6'7'8 The dry extended detention basin (grassy swale) on the west end of the park and the off -site open channel flow adjacent to the railroad tracks provide additional stormwater treatment benefits as previously described and also conform to the LID concept. We acknowledge the benefits of bioretention ponds (rain gardens) and constructed wetlands where high nutrient loadings exist (e.g. nitrogen, phosphorous, organic matter) such as for municipal wastewater. However, stormwater is a very dilute waste, typically low in bio- available nutrient loading. Based on this fact, we question the appropriateness Patrick Murphy/PE777 April 28, 2000 of such a system, especially for the small drainage volume requiring treatment. In addition to being an excessive remedial action for our stormwater treatment needs, bioretention ponds have other stringent requirements associated with them that reduce the applicability to this site. First, bioretention systems must receive constant flow and be saturated at all times to perform at design capacity.9 This condition seems highly unlikely to be met based on our annual precipitation in San Diego. Flow augmentation from an outside source such as potable or irrigation water results in reprocessing "clean" water rather than mitigating the intended target, urban runoff. The constant saturation of the site also creates a breeding ground for mosquitoes and odors which are potential public nuisances. Secondly, the system requires installation of an impervious liner to avoid seepage to keep the system saturated.10 Since natural soil filtration of solids no longer is allowed to occur because of the impermeable liner, settleable solids must be dredged out of the pond and taken to an appropriate solids disposal facility. Dredged solids must be tested for the presence of toxicants to determine if they must be disposed of as a hazardous waste. In this case the system must be permitted as a hazardous waste generation facility and comply with EPA disposal and treatment provisions authorized by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Included among the provisions of these Acts is mandatory public notification and cradle -to -grave material chain -of- custody reporting. Lastly, bioretention systems can be relatively large when compared to the proposed total park area. Any saturated system will be park area that is unavailable for the use and enjoyment of the community of Leucadia and presents a potential health and safety hazard. In light of this, we believe that the two uses may not be compatible. Open channel drainae is also one of many non - structural BP's identified in the above referenced articles.6 8 M We agree that open channel flow may be desirable, but when applied to individual lot drainage the benefits may be relatively minor when compared to the structural and non - structural treatment systems already in place for drainage treatment and the potential impacts on the practical and aesthetic issues of the project as a whole. However, we believe other natural, effective treatment alternatives exist that do not compromise the utility or aestheticsof the community park. One of these options is overland flow in grass swales. Grass swales are a natural stormwater pollution abatement option that is recognized as a stormwater BMP (Best Management Practice). These highly effective vegetated treatment systems remove pollutants by means of sedimentation, filtration, soil sorption and/or plant uptake. In a biofiltration swale performance study performed by Kulzer and Homer et all 1, biofiltration removed over 80% of TSS, 60% of particulate Heavy Metals and over 70% Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Another report cites the TSS removal for grass swales at 93 %, higher thatij any other stormwater BMP.12 4 Patrick Murphy/PE777 April 28, 2000 The advantage of these systems is that they utilize grass to provide biological treatment. The grass does not need to be saturated to be effective and because it operates off -line to mainly handle nuisance flows, will remain dry throughout the majority of the year," This approach is more consistent with the rest of the proposed park, in contrast to the rain garden approach which will make that portion of the park unusable and perhaps unsightly and unsafe. Grass swales are also less maintenance intensive than rain gardens which require extensive harvesting of plant life to prevent clogging and landscape overburden. The other zoning issues related to reduced setback distances are clearly issues for City Council to address if changes from the existing design can be accommodated. While we do understand the ideas the author is trying to convey, the proposed subdivision has been specifically designed to conform and is required to conform with all local, state and federal codes. The design proposed by the author as it relates to reduced building setback requirements does not conform to the standards currently enforced by the City of Encinitas. If you have any comments or questions regarding the above, please feel free to call me at (858)259 -8212. Very Truly Yours, Pasco Engine�eringInc. ice,... ! %-�_ Tim Ross Project Engineer RCE 56068 tr Attachments (2): 1) Letter from Rochelle Campana to City of Encinitas, c/o Patrick Murphy, Dated March 1, 2000 2) Investigation of Structural Control Measures for New Development prepared for Sacramento Stormwater Management Program, Larry Walker and Assoc., Nov. 1999 References 1) Preliminary Hydrology Report and Detention Analysis for Greystone Homes, Inc., Prepared by Pasco Engineering, Inc., July, 1999 2) Evaluation of Stormceptor and Multi - chamber Treatment Train as Urban Retrofit Strategies, 1998, Greb, Steven R. Patrick Murphy/PE777 April 28, 2000 3) Investigation of Structural Control Measures for New Development prepared for Sacramento Stormwater Management Program, Larry Walker and Assoc., Nov. 1999, pg. 21 4) Investigation of Structural Control Measures for New Development prepared for Sacramento Stormwater Management Program, Lary Walker and Assoc., Nov. 1999, pg. 51 5) 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design Manual, Vol. 1, Maryland Department of the Environment, Draft Copy, Dec. '99, Chapter 2, pg. 2.39 6) Comparative Nutrient Export and Economic Benefits of Conventional and Better Site Design Techniques, Zielinski et al, Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, Maryland, Proceedings from the National Conference on Tools for Urban Water Resource Management and Protection, Chicago, IL, February 7 -10, 2000 7), Low- Impact Development Design: A New Paradigm for Stormwater Management, Mimicking and Restoring the Natural Hydrologic Regime, An Alternative Stormwater Management Technology, Lary S. Coffman, Department of Environmental Resources, Prince George's County, Maryland, Proceedings from the National Conference on Tools for Urban Water Resource Management and Protection, Chicago, IL, February 7 -10, 2000 8) Conservation Design: Managing Stormwater through Maximizing Preventative Nonstructural Practices, Wesley R. Homer, Environmental Management Center, Brandywine Conservancy, Chadds Ford, PA, Proceedings from the National Conference on Tools for Urban Water Resource Management and Protection, Chicago, IL, February 7 -10, 2000 9) Stormwater Management in Washington State, Volume V, Runoff Treatment BMP's, Public Review Draft, October 1999, Pg. 136 10) Stormwater Management in Washington State, Volume V, Runoff Treatment BMP's, Public Review Draft, October 1999, Pg. 125 11) Biofiltration Swale Performance, Recommendations, and Design Considerations, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle. Louise Kulzer and Richard Homer et al, Publication 657, October 1992 12) 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design Manual, Vol. 2, Maryland Department of the Environment, Draft Copy, Dec. '99, Appendix D -5, pg. D -5.2 13) Stormwater Management in Washington State, Volume V, Runoff Treatment BMP's, Public Review Draft, October 1999, Pg. 190 / 01 %30/01 13:57 V858 IN 8157 SB &0 Z001/001 SB MEMORANDUM W 0 sa &o, mc. DATE January 30, 2001 JOB# 57142.10 FIX Ll�TOGa : City of Encinitas Engineering Department, Attention: JEFF GARAMI FROM: Dan O'Rourke 9�_ RE: Street Name Choices for Greystone Homes - Bay Laurel - Tract 98 -240 We have re- submitted the Final Map, Grading Plans, and Improvement plans for this project on Friday, January 26, 2001. We hereby submit preferred street names for the City's review and approval. Please forward this list to the Engineering Department for selection and inclusion into the plan check now being performed. Please call me you have any questions. - 7 - 14 - rf I Private Driveway "A" Private Driveway "C" Private Driveway "D" Public Street "B" 1" Choice Silk Oak Lane Snow Flower Lane Sweet Laurel Lane Marble Leaf Drive Bottle Tree Lane Coral Berry Lane Star Jasmine Lar Raintree Drive Prior to returning the plan check, please give me a call. changes prior to the plan check turnaround. Thanks. Ittal m meo 7511 Mot Pages _ \ post -It' brand iax transm' Fro —'sib \U V Choice Red Bay Lane Fern Pine Lane Coral Gum Lane Bay La I Drive It woul help to get started on the plan D� Graystone Homes TM 98 -240 Plan check comments: Subdivision Map: Owner's certificate must match the ownership in the Title Report, currently there are two owners, one being Thomas Utman of the Wooglin Family Trust and Graystone. Homes. The offers of dedication must fit those of the acceptance statement by the City Clerk, and those shown on the map. The City wishes to reject the Park Site until the improvements are installed and also the 10 -foot wide access easement in lot 35. 3. The covenants need to be shown on the final map title sheet. Engineering will prepare their covenants on the second plan check. 4. The Boundary Adjustments need to be approved and the recording information from the Certificates of Compliance shown on the Final Map and in the Title Report. 5. Planning has agreed to call the Park Site lot, lot 47, this will make it easier to describe when the land is transferred to the City. 6. There is easements going through future building sites and this needs to be addressed. Building permits can't be issued with conflicting easements. 7. The Title Report does not shown the ownership of the 130 -foot by 140 -foot area or known as APN 254- 101 -07. 8. Submit request for a name for `B" street. `B" street needs to have an approved name and shown on the final map prior to recording of the final map. 9. Provide computer tapes of boundary, lot 47 (park site), and disc with NAD coordinates of final map for the City's GIS division. 10. Park Site (lot 47) should be same as computer tape. 11. Address comments on final map. Grading Plan 6775 -G 1. Add Storm Water Permit Certificate. This job will need a storm water permit and plan from Regional Water Control Board. 2. Use standard City of Encinitas Erosion Control Notes. 3. Show structural section and T.I. of all road sections as shown in Soils Report page 21. 4. Add dimensions on lots and data on street centerline. 5. Add symbol identifications chart. 6. The computer print out of Hydrology Report is confusing, have Engineer meet with City staff and explain terms and figures. Provide information identifying the soil type is "A ". 7. The detention basin needs calculation of capacity. 8. Add note that lots are to be graded to drain to the street unless otherwise designed. 9. Provide detail on the plans of how the biofilter system will be constructed and how the 6 -inch pipes will tie into the storm drains on B Street. 10. Address comments on plan check. Improvement Plans 1. Address comments on plans. 2. Add trench resurfacing to Legend and show on all cuts of existing pavement on plans. The City has its own standard drawing for trench resurfacing. 3. We still need a Title Report showing the owners who are to sign the plans. 4. The curbs and sidewalks are to be colored according to the conditions and this should be shown on the plans 5. Show structural section and T.I. of all road sections as shown in Soils Report page 21. 6. Add concrete cross gutter to the intersection of `B" street and Sanford Street. Water should be directed to `B" and the sump. We would like to keep the runoff to a minimum on Vulcan Ave. 7. Show the Bus Stop as required by condition SCE and obtain approval from NCTD. S. 9. 10. Provide an AC berm at the north end of the improvements on Vulcan Avenue. There is a low spot on the most northerly driveway to the trailer park and add note to plans to pave this area to drain. Need offsite right -of -way at the intersection of Sanford Street and `B" Street, see condition SCHH. Provide detail of the south side of Sanford Street for the demolition of the existing pavement and the connection of the driveways to the existing houses on the southside of Sanford Street. 1 4gv 3� L s. J� Greystone Homes Bay Laurel November 6, 2000 57142.20 PROPOSED PRODUCTION SCHEDULE Submittal 1" Submittal 1" Comments Received 2n° Submittal 2n° Comments Received 3r° Submittal 3rtl Comments Received Rough Grading Permit Calendar Week Date to City Date to SB &O Tumaround Time Dec 4, 2000 Dec 26, 2000 City - 3 weeks PC Jan 9, 2001 SB &O - 2 weeks revisions Jan 30, 2001 City - 3 weeks PC Feb 6, 2001 SB &O - 1 weeks revisions Feb 13, 2001 City - 1 week PC Feb 20, 2001 PLANS READY FOR PERMIT / ISSUE PERMIT We are assuming the Leucadia County Water District and the San Dieguito Water District are to perform plan checking under the same schedule. Submittals are to include grading, streets, sewer, water, storm drainage, wall plans and structural calculations, and landscaping and irrigation. j a ('.. C t 1 i C I L A Cor,01 l l �IK,Jpti �s J�r,SJ i o 1U/Lr4 �r�� ✓.rr� r)9IS r l_/ ,j S ) rJ 3�/p,Y_GCS �C S t—Y�— 114 1� �O J d'Zj�i C l j'i IL ��r1� Fug C"t q5 IUrf�L 1 1 e,4 III S d ,1N AS Pro/eni.l n... /or Compl. Aojeou August 27, 1999 L. Bring, Planning, Environmental Sciences and Management Services Ms Julie Sands Ogden Environmental and Energy Services 5510 Morehouse Drive San Diego, CA 92121 Corporate Office: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Re: LCWD Response to Server Service Questionnaire for EIR Greystone Homes Project, Encinitas Case #98 -240 Dear Ms Sands, 760.942.5147 / u Fax 760.632.. 0164 1228.45 This letter provides a response to your request for information from Leucadia County Water District (District), dated August 12, 1999, for sewer information regarding the referenced project. Our knowledge of the project is based on maps provided to the District. This map is attached as Exhibit 1. Question No. 1: Indicate the location of facilities which serve the project area and present available capacity for the affected trunk line and treatment plant. Attached is a graphic, Exhibit 2, showing the location of existing facilities surrounding the project site. Currently, the facilities adjacent to the project have adequate capacity to convey wastewater flows from the subject project. There are future downstream sewer improvements planned including the Vulcan Sewer Project; Batiquitos Influent Sewer; Batiquitos Pump Station Improvements, and Occidental Sewer Improvements. These projects are scheduled in the recently updated LCWD Wastewater Master Plan and will be funded by existing LCWD reserves and future connection fees. The District owns adequate capacity at the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility to treat wastewater from the subject project. Question No. 2: What is the estimated sewage flow for the project based upon the above mentioned residential land use? Using typical LCWD planning estimates for sewage flow from the 50 proposed homes would result in an estimate of approximately 10,750 gallons per day (gpd) average dry weather flow. An additional 11 upstream lots are also anticipated to be serviced by the Greystone sewer in the future increasing average flow to a total of 13,115 gpd. Wastewater collection, pumping, transmission, and disposal facilities must be sized for a peak dry weather flow of at least 40,657 gallons per day (28 gallons per minute). These estimates of projected flow should be verified by the project design engineer and should be submitted to LCWD for review and approval, as part of the improvement plan review process. Ms Julie Sands August 27, 1999 Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Page 2 of Question No. 3: Do you have any assessment fees for other required or recommended mitigation measures for the project? This land has previously been annexed to Leucadia County Water District and therefore annexation procedures and fees are not required for the proposed development. Tentative and Final Maps, Grading Plans, and Improvement Plans must be submitted to the District for review. A plan check deposit of about $1,000 will be required depending on length of sewer and actual cost of plan checking. Depending on final sewer length, deposits of about $2,000 will be required for field inspection plus about $750 for television inspection of the constructed sewer. Actual costs may vary depending on the complexity of the project and the issues encountered during the design and construction process. Connection fees must be paid after acceptance of sewer construction and prior to house connection. The District assesses connection fees of $3,256 for each Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) within the development. A single family house is one EDU. The connection fees may be adjusted on a District - wide basis in this fiscal year through due process to reflect the recent master plan update and financing and revenue plan for the District. The District also assesses an annual sewer service fee last adjusted (reduced) on July 1, 1999 to $155 per residential unit per year. A brief review of potential future sewer service to adjacent properties east of the proposed Greystones Homes Project has tentatively concluded that the Greystone Homes Project should extend sewer through proposed residential lot(s) to the offsite properties. These upstream properties are not currently served by public sewer, but instead, we understand, have individually owned and maintained septic tanks and leach fields. LCWD recommends that Greystone mitigate development impacts on the community by extending sewer at least to the adjacent property(ies) and preferably to Sanford Lane. The extent of the offsite sewer will depend on the cooperation and dedication of easements by some of the potential upstream sewer customers. LCWD requests, as a minimum, that Greystone construct all on -site sewer and easements at Greystone expense and off -site sewer to a manhole(s) within 10' of property line on the contiguous parcel(s). The exact plan, profile, and extent of sewer can be determined at a later time. The design and construction should then be implemented through the LCWD improvement plan review and construction inspection process. Ms Julie Sands August 27, 1999 Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Page 3 of 3 Question No. 4: Would implementation of the project present a significant increase in service demand upon project development? The project will not represent a significant increase in wastewater flows into the District's wastewater system. The project will increase District maintenance requirements, however, this impact is not considered to be significant. Annual sewer service fees paid by residents will cover the additional cost of this increased maintenance including pumping, transmission, treatment, and disposal. Question No. 5: Is there any other relevant information regarding significant project impacts? Developing the ability to provide future sewer service to the upstream properties may avoid future septic system failure problems and surrounding area impacts of those problems. Construction of an offsite service sewer now will avoid future disruption of the Greystone development and surrounding community. Closing Thank you for this opportunity to provide comments. Please call, if you have any questions. Very truly yours, DUDEK & Associates, Inc. Steve Deering, P. E. LCWD District Engineer cc: Mike Bardin, LC WD Assistant General Manager Meleah Ashford, P. E., Associate Engineer, Dudek & Associates Alan Archibald, Encinitas Director of Engineering Services m ,Q Ln ?� oo c:;r- SZ -s I Exhibit 2 / L WD EYI N SEW 6 _kc a a Jeff arami e: Vulcan Av N /Hillcrest St/Sanford St From: Mike Valles To: Jeff Garami Date: 7/23/99 3 33P Subject: Re: Vulcan Av N /Hillcrest St/Sanford St Jeff, I arrived at the job site about 1:OOP M. I saw what appeared to be a firebreak being or had been done along the southerly perimeter of this property (the northerly side of Sanford st.) I then continued northerly on Sanford Ln. l saw no grading being done within this property. As (drove back I stopped to take pictures at 235 & 207 Sanford St. One picture shows fresh turned dirt ,and the other shows a tractor and disk attached . I spoke to the security guard onsite (C.P.S. ) He said that he came on duty early A.M. and the only equiptment was the tractor and disk . I tried to contact the lady that filed the complaint J left a message for her to call me .1 did not issue a stop work notice. Photo's in my file mikev. 4 Page 1 & ASSOCIATES, INC- P-&-...1 TI.- I,C.m,?n P-,<,r May 24, 1999 Bring, Planning, Environmental Sciences and Management Services City of Encinitas Community Development Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Corporate Office: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Re: Greystone Homes Project, Encinitas Case #98 -240 Dear Sirs, r, 760.942.5147 Fax 760.632.1 1 This letter is sent in response to the request for comments as to the scope and content of the environmental information which is germane to Leucadia County Water District's (LCWD's) responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. LCWD provides sewer service in the Leucadia community of the City of Encinitas. The Greystone Homes Project is entirely within the LCWD service area and does not require annexation to LCWD for sewer service. A large area of Leucadia directly to the east of the Greystone project was developed on larger lots with individual septic tank treatment followed by leach field disposal. This area has commonly been (mown to LCWD as the "Island Area;' because it is within the LCWD sphere of influence, but not yet annexed to LCWD or served by municipal sewer. It is not uncommon for leach fields in the Island Area to eventually fail over time without opportunity for rehabilitation. This can result in condemnation of the property until such time as the disposal system can be replaced with a municipal sewer. It is the District's goal and duty to provide the "Island Area" with sewer service, as opportunities for service become available. The Greystone, Homes Project is located contiguous to the Island Area. In fact, the Greystone Homes are also proposing a cut slope and retaining wall system on the border with existing Island Area homes. Depending on the existing soils and geology in the area this new ding of the embankment may intercept leach field filtrate. LCWD has completed a preliminary investigation of the proposed project and has determined that there are 11 lots that could be served by an easterly extension of the Greystone sewer. Attached to this letter is a summary table of four sewer service options for these 11 lots by extension of the Greystone sewer with a series of graphics to support the summary table. LCWD requests that the City require Greystone Homes to implement Option 3 described and shown on the attached graphics. This would require all of the following items: 1) A 20 -foot wide on -site sewer easement through the north 20 feet of Lot 13 to Sanford Lane and as necessary to transition to the adjacent property. Three manholes and about 650 feet of 8" sewer from Greystone Street B to Sanford Lane and continuing north on Sanford Lane B�' City of Encinitas May 11, 1999 Greystone Homes Project Page 2 of 2 should be required. We request that Greystone be required to provide the easement engineering and legal services for the off -site easement to Sanford Lane. We understand that the property owners' of AP 254- 102 -20 and AP 254- 102 -20 prefer that the pipeline alignment be on property line and that both properties provide easement area. 2) A 20 -foot wide easement through the south 20 feet of Lot 17 from Street C to the back of Assessor Parcel 0254- 102 -12 should be provided. Provide two additional manholes and approximately 180 feet of 8" sewer. Easement engineering and legal services for the off -site easement around the terminal manhole should also be provided. 3) If proposed Street C is a private road, LCWD also requests an easement for the entire area of Street C. 4) For all off -site work, Greystone should be responsible for replacement in kind of improvements removed or damaged as part of the work. 5) Greystone should be responsible for design, title report and title insurance, easement preparation and recording, construction, and all plan checking and inspection fees associated with the normal sewer improvement processing in LCWD, both for the on -site and off -site facilities. Please call if you would like to further discuss the project or the proposed requirements. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, DUDEK & Associates, Inc. teve Deering, PE LCWD District Engineer cc. Mr. Tim Jochem, LCWD General Manager Mr. Mike Bardin, LCWD Assistant General Manager Ms. Meleah Ashford, DUDEK & Associates, Inc. Mr. Alan Archibald, Encinitas Director of Engineering Services Leucadia County Water District Potential Service Options to Customers along Sanford Lane C: \lcwd \Sanford_options.doc Page 3 1919.45 No. of Lots Option Description Ultimately Option Pros Option Cons Served Option 1: This option consists of a shallow sewer mainline down 11 0 LCWD will have relatively easy • Individual pump stations would be required the middle of Sanford Lane connecting to the existing manhole in access to maintain the sewer. and are not desirable. Sanford Lane east of Shore View Lane. This option would • Homeowners properties will not be • Construction along Sanford Lane will be potentially serve 5 lots on the west and 6 lots on the east side of impacted by sewer mainline. difficult because of overhead utilities and Sanford Lane. Lots to the west (downhill) would be required to s No easements are required. narrow access. use individual pump stations to lift the wastewater up into the main. Lots to the east would be able to connect using gravity sewer laterals. Option 2 -A: This option consists of a two sewer segments. The I1 • LCWD will have relatively easy • Available options to homeowners is first is a shallow sewer mainline down the middle of Sanford Lane access to maintain the sewer. inconsistent (some must use pump stations connecting to a second line from Sanford Lane running west to Although access to MH in some can use a gravity system). connect with the sewer main in the Greystone development. The 3 homeowners property is not . Construction through homeowner B's northern lots on the west side of Sanford Lane would use accessible, line cleaning can be property will not be easy due to narrow individual pump stations to lift their sewage to the line in Sanford achieved from above or below. access and landscaping that will be Lane. The 2 southern lots could connect directly to the east -west disturbed. line by gravity sewer lateral. The home on the east side of • Public casement/access would be required Sanford would connect to the main along Sanford Lane via gravity across homeowners ro e P P rtY laterals. Option 2 -B: This option differs from 2 -A only in that all homes 11 • LCWD will have relatively easy • Individual easements between homeowners west of Sanford Lane will connect via private laterals. access to maintain the sewer. would be required. • For the most part, available options • Some of the laterals are over 200' long. to homeowners are consistent. • Public easement/access would be required • All connections are gravity across homeowners property. Option 3: Option 3 consists of 2 lines extending from the 11 . Homeowners could connect via • The Greystone development would be Greystone system up to the property owners on the west of gravity laterals. impacted in 2 locations. Sanford Lane. Manholes would be constructed on the . Service options are provided to • Individual easements would be required homeowners property. The southern extension would then extend properties to the east of Sanford between homeowners. to and along Sanford Lane. Gravity sewer - lateral connections Lane. • New manholes would be virtually would be made to these new mains. Phis option would allow all inaccessible to LCWD crews. homes to be connected by gravity sewer laterals. 0 Public easement/access would be required across homeowners property. C: \lcwd \Sanford_options.doc Page 3 1919.45 � \ § § � 4 _ O % ¥ : 9 7 i 2 � ©k \/t » § • ) ; ¥ ` � \ § ; \ \ § § JL £© ! ± 77 2 ` �\ � ■ $ � 2 ® ƒ 3 § § § § ) ) ^ � . � ® $ 4 _ O % ¥ : 9 7 i 2 � ©k \/t » § §� § ; \ \ § § JL ® »/ 77 2 � � § § §� L cwi Ofwrtn VA 2 4 _ \ ! � 8 E ; 7 qa� 9 2 \ ■ �(i . ¥o! 2 m ! o ! - 4 c E } \ | § / { § | | ) ( p rl /�a n \ ]® 4 A. 0 z »2 2 ® r3 - § rn rn ) ; � e K \ § } ) § § § t y ¥ - 2 \ \ % � § K ( ! � �\ ! § ! 1 § \ Vi \ � { \ � \ i §z ; ! � ) ` x $ , ; \ 3 � \ � / � D 2 ; _ \ / § J § — � }2 ; @ y § ; � ! ; K � ° ; ¥ ; \ \ % � § K ( ! � �\ ! § ! 1 § \ Vi \ � { \ � \ i §z ; ! � ) ` x $ , ; \ 3 � \ � / � D 2 ; _ \ / § J § — � }2 ; @ y § \ \ % � § K ( ! � �\ ! § ! 1 § \ Vi \ � { \ � \ i §z ; ! � ) ` x $ , ; \ \ � / � \ / § �\ � }2 @ 4 ; � ! ; \� ! \ ! L. C,�1 D O P'n QUA S � ! ; \ � | ; � § } 9" /\ E 4 / ; $ § / - E � 5 § � ® ± § § 2 §[m§ «n N °- ( °f ; /; / , \ , & w i R OF First American T itle DOC # 2001-0378871-10 SUBDIVISION MAPPING DEPT 1 2 2 Q L� 1 H V V Jug ii , 2001 4:21 When recorded mail to: II I I OFFICIAL REM City Clerk SAN DIEM COtWY RECORDER 'S OFFICE City 1 - II 8I 2I0 I I I I I) II �ITN� CIUNTY kECORIER of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue 200383 FEE D Encinitas, CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE /7/ �/Hg -p( COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY Ir46 Assessor's Parcel �!Q. 254 052 - 12,813 254 - 101 - ,2, ' 254- 102 -51 Project . TM 98 240 A. GREYSTONE HOMES ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TM 98 -240 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof B. In consideration of TM98 -240 by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment "B" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond. CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. Cov98 -240 SIGHT DISTANCE PM r� Va RECORDED REQU- Firsl American . itle SUBDIVISION MAPPING DEPT 15439 Recording Requested By: City Planner When Recorded Mail To DOC 2001- 0337198 MAY 24, 2001 4:25 PM City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas CA 92024 ) SPACE ABC OFFICIAL RECORDS SAM DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, CUM RECORDER FEES: 26.00 11111111111111111111111 COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY ry FUTURE PARK, TRAFFIC, AND FLOOD CONTROL FEES Assessor's Parcel Number: 254- 052 -12,13 Project No. TM 98 -240 254- 101 -7,24 254- 102 -51 A. GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATION ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows: See Attachment "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of Final Map approval for the above referenced project by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment "B" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the- prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the other parry. F. Failure of the OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. COV98 -240 15500 G. Upon OWNER's satisfaction of OWNERs duties and obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and CITY shall execute a "Satisfaction of Covenant'. H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: OWNER Dated 4[26tD k / (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached) s;nrc.�r �.►,+D►>s 4� �'J's'`'`� ATTACH NOTARY HERE CITY OF ENCINITAS Dated �� /r! taw by og�a= (Notan tza to not required) Bill Weedman, City Planner COV99 -247 15501 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of �nn Ui cam- I 5s. Cal On T5M 1 ii 2St� k , before me, tW(VA U22-1 J�DV✓LAr R-tbllG Date 1 1 Name ano I tie of Officer (eg.. 'Jane Doa " Pu0K 1 1 personally appeared Ntti ilCle L Lk- yfes,40 , Namel s) of S.gnegs DONNA LEE f Commission # 1239625 3 - Notary Public: - Confonro g San Diego County W Comm. Expies Ocl 19,2M3 Place Nolary Seal Alive Ypersonally known to me proved to me nn the hasis of caticfactory e 'i'4S_de_^Lo- to be the person(lsiL whose name(Q0ar¢ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me tha he shae /thay executed the same in i hef /their authorized capacity(ies.), and that by Is hEwItheiir signature(s) on the instrument the person( or the entity upon behalf of which the person( acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS y hand an fficial seal. synamre a Noun PubM1c OPTIONAL Though the Information below Is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on fhe document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: Ll Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): E: Partner — - Limited General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF S GNER 0 1997 National Nolary AS cation • 9350 De Solo Ave., PO. Box 2402 • CBalnwonh CA 91313-2402 Prod No 5907 Reoroar Call TO Free 1,800 - 876.6827 15502 EXHIBIT'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS PARCEL A THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 9, IN BLOCK 21 AND THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 7 THROUGH 11 IN BLOCK 22, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF HYGEIA AVENUE, SANFORD STREET AND JUNO AVENUE, AS VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, AND JANUARY 28, 1925, BY ORDERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CERTIFIED COPIES OF WHICH SAID ORDERS WERE RECORDED RESPECTIVELY DECEMBER 26, 1918 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 AND FEBRUARY 9, 1925 IN BOOK 1071, PAGE 122, BOTH OF DEEDS, ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF HYGEIA AVENUE WITH A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 480.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET (NOW HILLCREST DRIVE) AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 524, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO ROBERT LLOYD WESTREM, RECORDED JULY 23, 1936 IN BOOK 546, PAGE 82 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, THENCE SOUTH 74 017'30" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 651 00 FEET TO A POINT IN A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 320.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID MAP NO, 524, THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 15 042'30" EAST 319.60 FEET TO A POINT IN A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 120.00 FEET NORTHERLY FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SANFORD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 524; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 74 017'30" EAST 130.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15 042'30" EAST 140 00 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 20.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SANFORD STREET, THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 74 017'30" EAST 700.00 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 170.00 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOTS 7 THROUGH 11 IN BLOCK 22 OF SAID MAP NO. 524, THENCE NORTH 15 042'30" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 639.50 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 33.10 FEET OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 74 017'30" WEST 170.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID HYGEIA AVENUE, THENCE SOUTH 15 042'30" EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 179.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARCELS OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS TO SULANA B SAE -ONGE, RONALD E JOHNSON AND THOMAS D HARDEBECK AND MARY MARTHA HARDEBECK BY DEEDS RECORDED MAY 4, 2001 AS FILE NOS. 2001- 0282072, 2001- 0282073, AND 2001- 0282074, RESPECTIVELY OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARCELS OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS TO G WILLIAM HALL AND SALLY B HALL, CO- TRUSTEES OF THE HALL FAMILY TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 15, 1999 AND WILLIAM MICHAEL LAFFERTY AND LISA STONE LAFFERTY, BY DEEDS RECORDED MAY 17, 2001 AS FILE NOS 2001- 0316154 AND 2001- 0316155, RESPECTIVELY OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 15503 PARCEL B ALL OF LOTS 7 TO 10 INCLUSIVE AND PORTION OF LOTS 6 AND 11 IN BLOCK 27, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF SANFORD STREET AND JUNO AVENUE, AND ALSO A PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 27, AS SAID STREET, AVENUE AND ALLEY WERE VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH SAID ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, DISTANT 20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 116.125 FEET NORTHWESTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 320 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND DISTANT EASTERLY THEREFROM 320 FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE 136.125 FEET TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 320 FEET ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C ALL OF LOTS 2 TO 15 INCLUSIVE AND A PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 16, IN BLOCK 27, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF SANFORD STREET AND JUNO AVENUE, AND ALSO A PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 27, AS SAID STREET, AVENUE AND ALLEY WERE VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH SAID ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO; ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS- BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, DISTANT 20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 480 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET, AS SAID STREET IS SHOWN ON MAP NO 763, OF NORTH LEUCADIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND DISTANT EASTERLY THEREFROM, 320 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE, 380 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF 15504 SAID BLOCK 27, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING FROM ALL OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY THE SOUTHEASTERLY 136.125 FEET THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHWESTERLY 6.50 FEET THEREOF ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN DEED TO KENNETH L VALLONE, TRUSTEE OR HIS SUCCESSORS IN TRUST UNDER THE VALLONE 1987 IRREVOCABLE TRUST UNDER AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 25, 1987, RECORDED MAY 10 2001 AS FILE NO 2001- 0294688 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL D THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 I BLOCK 21 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, AND OF THE NORTHWESTERLY 20 FEET OF SANFORD STREET AND OF THE NORTHEASTERLY 20 FEET OF JUNO AVENUE, VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE NOVEMBER 19, 1915 BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS' BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 320.00 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE WEST LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID NORTH LEUCADIA AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF, WITH A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 939.6 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. SAID POINT BEING ON A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 20 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 21 AND THE PROLONGATION THEREOF. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 A DISTANCE OF 140 0 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET 130.0 FEET, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, A DISTANCE OF 140 0 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20.0 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 21, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 130 0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. l PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ATTACHMENT "B" TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY PROJECT NO. TM 98 -240 OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS 15505 A. In accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 23.98 in effect at time of fees being paid, park fees for the development shall be paid prior to Final Occupancy approval. B. In accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 23.94 in effect at time of fees being paid, traffic fees for the development shall be paid prior to Final Occupancy approval. C. In accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 23.96 in effect at time of fees being paid, flood control fees shall be assessed and collected during the building permit processing prior to the construction of any impervious surfaces. COV99 -247 RECORDED REQUEST OF }} First Am # erica►r Title DOC -301-0337201 ,l SUBDIVISION MAPPING DEPT, Recording Requested by: MAY 24, 2001 4:2-715 PM City Engineer OFFICIAL RECORDS When Recorded Mail To: 15 52 0 SAN DIEGO COINTY RECORDER'S OFFICE 111111111" SMITH, MLKTY RECORDER Encinitas City City 505 S. FEES: 44.00 Vulcan Avenue IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII J,7 Encinitas, CA 92024 2001 - 0337201 b SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE lie I F �i/� � COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel No. 254 - 052 -9.-,13 Project No.: TM 98 -240 254 - 101 - 7,24' W.O. No.: 6775 i 254 - 102 -51✓ A. GREYSTONE HOMES, INC, A DELAWARE CORPORATION (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TM 98- 240 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of private improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required private improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter) , SUBDIVIDER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Exhibit B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. SUBDIVIDER agrees that SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys fees, from the other party. 6 I� RECORDED REQUEST OF First American Title S.'� VISION MAPPING DEPT. Recording Requested by: City Engineer OCC # 001- 0337202 15533 MAY 24, 2001 4:25 PM OFFICIAL RECORDS When Recorded Mail To: SAH DIEGO COURTY R'ECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, CtItRITY RECORDER City Clerk FEES: 44.00 City of Encinitas O Vulcan Avenue ncin tas, CA 92024 E IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII r, 2001- 0337202 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE A. GREYSTONE HOMES INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATION TM 98 -240 6775 -1 (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TM 98- 240 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of public improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required public improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City �C COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel No.254- 052 -1113 Project No.: 254 - 101 -7,2 254 - 102 -51 W.O. No.: A. GREYSTONE HOMES INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATION TM 98 -240 6775 -1 (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TM 98- 240 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of public improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required public improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City RECORDED REQUEST OF 'First American Title SUBDIVISION MAPPING DEPT 15� 12 DOC # L-001 -03, 7200 MAY 24 , 2001 4 :'2:5 PM Recording Requested By: ) City of Encinitas ) When Recorded Mail To: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92024 ) SPACE aw `A of K� Assessor's Pars* No. 254 052 -113 254- 101 -7,24 254 - 102 -51 OFFICIAL RECORDS SM DIEGO COtklTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGOfi'Y J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER FEES: 29.00 N COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR GRADING /DRAINAGE Project NO..TM 98 -240 A. GREYSTONE HOMES INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATION ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of TM 98 -240 by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of RECORDED REQI,..., F OF L C A �+ First American Title J 5 V 6 SUBDIVISION MAPPING DEPT Recording Requested by: ) City Engineer ) When Recorded Mail To: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas. CA 92024 ) U/1=01112 DCC # 4001 - 0337199 MAY 24: 2001 4 :25 Phi OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO CO(KFY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH„ CEO RECatDER FEES: 23.00 ,..CE. I COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY WAIVER OF PROTEST TO ASSESSMENTS Assessor's Parcel./ ✓ Numbers :254 - 052 - 12,13 254-101z,-7,24 `� 254 -101 Project No. TM 98 -240 (#zusfir A. ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TM 98-240 ("PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows: See Attachment "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of TM 98 -240 OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: No protest shall be made by the owners to any proceedings for the installation or acquisition of street improvements, including undergrounding of utility lines, under any special assessment 1911 or the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, or any other applicable state or local law, and whether processed by the City of Encinitas or any other governmental entity having jurisdiction in the matter and for the purposes of determining property owners support for same. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. COV98- 240.DOC MP 237.50 RIGHT OF ENTRY PERMIT 01 -SD -01 GREYSTONE HOMES AGREEMENT, made as of this 14 day of 4 C-% 0 t , between the NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD (hereinafter called "BOARD'), owner of the San Diego Northern Railway (hereinafter called "SDNR "), and GREYSTONE HOMES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION (hereinafter called "PERMITTEE "). RECITALS A. BOARD is a public agency created by Sections 125000 et seq. of the Public Utilities Code. BOARD is the owner of certain railroad Right -of -Way assets extending from Oceanside to San Diego and from Oceanside to Escondido (hereinafter referred to as the "Right -of- Way "). The Right -of -Way is in active use for the operation of freight trains (by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company [hereinafter "BNSF "]), intercity passenger trains (by the National Railroad Passenger Corporation [hereinafter "AMTRAK "]) and commuter trains (by BOARD). Due to this active use of the Right -of -Way, safety of the public and the aforesaid rail operators and the structural and physical integrity of the Right -of -Way (including the air space over the Right -of -Way) are of paramount concern to BOARD. B. PERMITTEE desires to enter onto and/or use a portion of the Right -of -Way in a manner which does not interfere with the BOARD's operations, including response to emergencies and routine maintenance, or the safe use of the Right -of -Way by BOARD and other rail entities. BOARD is willing to allow PERMITTEE to enter onto and/or use a portion of the Right -of -Way, provided that PERMITTEE acts in strict accordance with this Permit. Now, therefore, the BOARD and PERMITTEE agree as follows: Grant of Permit. a) Grant and Payment of Fee. In consideration of the payment by PERMITTEE to BOARD, in advance, a non - refundable fee of five hundred dollars ($500.00) payable to NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, as partial consideration for the rights and privileges mentioned in this Permit and of the faithful performance of the covenants and agreements herein set for to be performed by PERMITTEE, BOARD hereby Permits PERMITTEE to enter upon BOARD property solely for the limited purpose stated in Paragraph Ib), below. b) Purpose of Permit. The Permit granted by BOARD to PERMITTEE pursuant to Paragraph Ia), above, and in accordance with the terms of this Permit Agreement, is for the purpose of: grading and construction of drainage improvements as shown on Plans for the Public and Private Improvements of. City of Encintas Tract No. 98 -240, Bay Laurel, City of Encinitas Drawing No. 6775 -I, and Grading Plans for City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -240, Bay Laurel, City of Encinitas Drawing No. 6775 -G, all of which plans are incorporated herein by reference. Note that PERMITTEE is to maintain k -rail with a 6' chain link fence on top between the work area and tracks (no closer than 10' from centerline of track) at all times whil working in the Right -of -Way. The exact method of construction of said project shall be subject to the review and approval of BOARD and/or BOARD's engineering representative. Page 1 4/18/01 G Cr C� S MP 237 50 01 -SD -01 GREYSTONE HOMES c) It is further expressly understood and agreed by PERMITTEE that this instrument constitutes a Permit only to use the Right -of -Way for the above - stated purpose in strict accordance with the terms of this Permit Agreement and shall not be construed as granting to PERMITTEE any right -of- possession, estate, title or interest whatsoever in or to the Right -of- Way, or any part thereof. d) Use of Right -of -Way. It is expressly understood and agreed by PERMITTEE that PERMITTEE shall use the Right -of -Way without interference or damage to the pipe lines, electric transmission lines, telephone lines, telegraph lines and other facilities of like character, existing or constructed during the continuance of this Permit upon, under or across the Right -of- Way. PERMITTEE hereby agrees that it will indemnify and save harmless BOARD and its licensees from and against any liability for any such interference or damage. e) Liability for Title Claim. In case of the eviction of PERMITTEE by anyone owning or claiming title to, or any interest in the Right -of -Way, BOARD shall not be liable to PERMITTEE for any damage of any nature whatsoever. 2. Termination of Permit. a) Misuse of Permit. If PERMITTEE shall use said Right -of -Way for any other purpose than as stated in Paragraph lb), above, or fails to act strictly in accordance with the terms of this Permit Agreement, then BOARD, its successors and assigns may immediately and without prior notice to PERMITTEE terminate this Permit and prevent PERMITTEE from using or remaining upon the Right -of -Way, with or without process of law. b) Completion of Purpose. This Permit and the PERMITTEES rights hereunder shall terminate automatically upon the completion of the purpose stated in Paragraph lb), above. 3. PERMITTEES Obligation on Termination. PERMITTEE agrees that upon termination of this Permit pursuant to Paragraph 2, above, and at its sole expense, it shall remove any and all equipment, tools, vehicles, materials, etc., placed on the Right -of -Way and/or used in connection with PERMITTEE' entry onto and/or use of the Right -of -Way and PERMITTEE shall restore the Right -of -Way in a manner satisfactory to BOARD. Should PERMITTEE fail or refuse to comply with the terms of this Paragraph 3, within fifteen (15) days, with any request made by BOARD to so do, BOARD may, at its option, perform such work and, in such event, PERMITTEE agrees to reimburse BOARD for the cost so incurred within 30 days of invoice. Failure on the part of BOARD to perform the obligations of PERMITTEE shall not release PERMITTEE from liability hereunder for loss or damage occasioned thereby. 4. No Relocation Rights. PERMITTEE hereby acknowledges that it has been informed that BOARD is a public entity and that the subject property has previously been acquired by BOARD for a public purpose. PERMITTEE further acknowledges that any rights acquired under this Agreement arose after the date of acquisition of the subject property and that said rights are subject to termination when the property is needed by BOARD for the public purpose. PERMITTEE hereby acknowledges and agrees that at the time of said termination of this Permit Agreement by BOARD, PERMITTEE will not be a "displaced person" entitled to any of the relocation assistance or benefits offered to displaced persons under State or Federal law. 5. Notices. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, all notices, statements, demands, approvals, or other communications to be given under or pursuant to this Agreement Page 2 4/18/01 MP 237.50 01 -SD -01 GREYSTONE HOMES will be in writing, addressed to the Parties at their respective addresses as provided below, and will be delivered in person, or by certified or registered mail, postage pre -paid, or by telegraph or cable, charges pre -paid. If mailed or telegraphed, the notice will be deemed to have been given 24 hours after the date of mailing or the date of delivery to the telegraph or cable company. The address of the Parties to which such notices are to be sent will be those of which the other Party or Parties actually receive notice, and until such further notice are as follows: BOARD: North San Diego County Transit Development Board 810 Mission Ave. Oceanside, California 92054 Attn: Right -of -Way Liaison (760) 966 -6504 ' : u ii l3 Greystone Homes, Inc., a Delaware Corporation 5780 Fleet Street, Ste. 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 Attn: Chris Earl 6. Continuing Obligations of PERMITTEE. No termination or cancellation of this Permit shall relieve or release PERMITTEE from any liability or obligation (whether of indemnity or otherwise) which may have attached or accrued previous to or which may be accruing at the time of such termination or cancellation. 7. PERMITTEE's Agents. Any contractor or subcontractor performing work on, or in connection with the PERMITTEE's use of or entry onto the Right -of -Way pursuant to this Permit, shall be conclusively deemed to be the servant and agent of PERMITTEE, acting on behalf and within the scope of such contractor's or subcontractor's employment for PERMITTEE. 8. Indemnity. PERMITTEE agrees to assume the defense of, indemnify, and hold the BOARD, BNSF and AMTRAK, their officers, employees, contractors and agents harmless from and against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs) arising from or as a result of the death or injury of any person or arising out of any accident, injury, loss or damage whatsoever (including, but not limited to, damage to the Right -of -Way) which shall occur on or adjacent to the Right -of -Way and which shall be directly or indirectly caused by any acts done thereon or any errors or omissions of PERMITTEE or its agents, servants, invitees, employees or contractors in connection with the work performed and the obligations assumed by PERMITTEE under this Permit Agreement or which results in any manner from, or in connection with the PERMITTEE's use of and/or entry onto the Right -of -Way and that it will promptly pay to BOARD the full amount of any loss or damage which BOARD may sustain, incur or become liable for, and all sums which BOARD may pay, or be compelled to pay, in settlement of any claim on account thereof. PERMITTEE shall have the full right to select competent counsel (subject to the approval of BOARD which may not be unreasonably withheld) to defend BOARD pursuant to this Paragraph. This Page 3 4/18/01 MP 237.50 01 -SD-01 GREYSTONE HOMES indemnification shall specifically apply, but not be limited to, any damages, costs or injuries resulting from PERMITTEE's failure to properly construct and maintain any improvement constructed by PERMITTEE or its agents, servants, invitees, employees or contractors in connection with the work performed and the obligations assumed by PERMITTEE under this Permit Agreement. PERMITTEE shall not be responsible for (and such indemnity shall not apply to) any injuries or damages which are caused by the sole negligence, active negligence or the willful misconduct of the BOARD or its respective officers, employees, contractors and agents. PERMITTEE shall pay all the costs incident to such defense, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees, investigators' fees, litigation expenses, settlement payments, and amounts paid in satisfaction of judgments. Any and all lawsuits or administrative actions brought or threatened on any theory of relief available at law, in equity or under the rules of any administrative agency, shall be covered by this section, including but not limited to the theories of intentional misconduct, negligence, breach of statute or ordinance or upon any theory created by statute or ordinance, State or Federal. NOTE: The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by PERMITTEE as required by Paragraph 9, below, and any approval of said insurance by BOARD, are not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by PERMITTEE pursuant to this agreement, including but not limited to the provisions concerning indemnification. 9. Liability Insurance. a) PERMITTEE, at PERMITTEE's sole cost and expense, shall procure and maintain the following commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance: 1) Coverage. Coverage for commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as the following: (i) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001). (ii) Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability Coverage (Form CA 0001), covering Symbol 1 (any auto). 2) Limits. PERMITTEE shall maintain limits no less than the following: (i) General Liability. Two million dollars per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply to the Right -of -Way (with the ISO CG 2503, or ISO CG 2504, or insurer's equivalent endorsement provided to BOARD) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (ii) Automobile Liability. One million dollars ($1,000,000) for bodily injury and property damage each accident limit. 3) Required Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain the following provisions: (i) BOARD, its directors, officers, employees, contractors, agents or authorized volunteers are to be named as additional insureds as respects liability arising out of PERMITTEE's operations and activities or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by PERMITTEE. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to BOARD, its directors, officers, employees, agents or authorized volunteers. Page 4 4118/01 MP 237.50 01 -SD-01 GREYSTONE HOMES (ii) For any claims arising from PERMITTEE's operations or activities, PERMITTEE's insurance shall be primary insurance to BOARD, its directors, officers, employees, contractors, agents or authorized volunteers. Any insurance, self - insurance or other coverage maintained by BOARD, its directors, officers, employees, agents or authorized volunteers shall not contribute to it. (iii) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to BOARD, its directors, officers, employees, contractors, agents or authorized volunteers. (iv) PERMITTEE's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (v) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall state or be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party, except after thirty (30) days (10 days for non - payment of premium) prior written notice by U.S. mail has been given to BOARD. (vi) Such liability insurance shall indemnify against loss from liability imposed by law for damages on account of bodily injury (including death), property damage, and personal injury. (vii) The general liability policy shall cover bodily injury and property damage liability, owned and non -owned equipment, and blanket contractual liability. (viii) The automobile liability policy shall cover all owned, non - owned, and hired automobiles. (ix) All policy or endorsement limitations relating specifically to operations on or near railroad property or track shall be eliminated. Option: Purchase separate railroad protective insurance policy for the general liability amounts as stated above. (x) All of the insurance shall be provided on policy forms and through companies reasonably satisfactory to BOARD. (xi) Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers having a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A -, VII or equivalent or as otherwise approved by BOARD. 4) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance. PERMITTEE shall cover or insure under the applicable laws relating to workers' compensation insurance, all of their employees working on or about the Right -of -Way, all in accordance with the "Workers' Compensation and Insurance Act," Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California and any Acts amendatory thereof. PERMITTEE shall provide employers liability insurance in the amount of, at least, $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease. 5) Evidences and Cancellation of Insurance. Prior to execution of the contract, PERMITTEE shall file with BOARD a certificate of insurance signed by the insurer's representative. Such evidence shall also include confirmation that coverage includes or has been modified to include Required Provisions as set forth in Article 9.3) above. PERMITTEE shall, upon the reasonable demand of BOARD, deliver to BOARD such policy or policies of insurance. 6) Workers' Compensation Insurance. By his/her signature hereunder, PERMITTEE certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self- Page 5 4/19/01 MP 237.50 01 -SD -01 GREYSTONE HOMES insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and it will comply with such provisions in connection with any work performed on the Site. Any persons providing services with or on behalf of PERMITTEE shall be covered by workers' compensation (or qualified self - insurance). 10. Maintenance of Improvements. PERMITTEE shall maintain and repair all improvements except (1) as the BOARD shall elect by written notice to PERMITTEE or (2) as otherwise provided pursuant to any other written agreement between BOARD and PERMITTEE. In meeting its responsibilities pursuant to this Paragraph PERMITTEE shall not obstruct any public rights of way adjacent to the Right -of -Way. BOARD and/or its agents shall have the right to inspect the improvements on the Right -of -Way during normal business hours subject to reasonable notice to PERMITTEE. 11. Compliance With Rail Regulations. PERMITTEE, by its signature on this Permit Agreement agrees to abide by the rules and regulations of the San Diego Northern Railway at all times while on the Right -of -Way. Said rules and regulations include, but are not limited to, the wearing of hard hats, protective goggles, reflective vests and steel -toed (or equivalent) shoes at all times while working on the BOARD's property. 12. Additional Conditions Relating To Construction of Improvements. The following conditions shall apply to any construction, maintenance and/or works of improvement done by PERMITTEE pursuant to its rights under this Permit Agreement (hereinafter called the "work "): a) PERMITTEE agrees that no work by itself or its authorized agent will interfere with any railroad operations on the Right -of -Way. b) PERMITTEE shall reimburse BOARD within 30 days of invoice for all cost and expense incurred by BOARD (including a 7.2% administrative fee) in connection with said work including, but without limitation, consultants fees, markout of railroad facilities, the expense of furnishing inspectors, security and flag protection as BOARD deems necessary, the installation and removal of false work beneath tracks, equipment rentals and restoration of BOARD Right - of -Way to the same condition as when PERMITTEE entered thereon. c) All individuals, including representatives and employees of the City, the PERMITTEE and any subcontractor, before entering onto the BOARD's property shall first attend the BOARD's Safety Orientation Class. All costs of complying with the BOARD's safety requirements will be at the expense of the PERMITTEE. d) Delay /Cancellation of Trains. PERMITTEE shall pay all costs associated with the delay or cancellation of trains due to failure to maintain at least one track open through the job site at all times. Delay charges are estimated to be $2,000 per passenger train delayed over 30 minutes and may include the cost of busing passengers around the work area, if necessary. e) All work contemplated by this Permit shall be in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the BOARD (and as altered pursuant to Paragraph 12m) and all applicable local, state and federal regulations, including California PUC regulations. f) Board Contacts. Contact Chip Willett at (760) 966 -6504 (810 Mission Ave., Oceanside, CA 92054) at least 3 days prior to the start of any work on the Right of Way for scheduling a pre - construction meeting. Page 6 4/18/01 tiIP 237 50 01 -SD -01 GREYSTONE HOMES g) Markout of BOARD Facilities. PERMITTEE shall contact Mr. Jonathan Chapman of BOARD at (760) 966 -6514 prior to the start of anv construction work for a markout of BOARD facilities. Please be advised that BOARD is not a member of Dig Alert. h) DIG :ALERT. Contact Dig -Alert at (800) 4224133 prior to anv excavation in the Right -of -Nay. i) NICl/NIFS/NVorldcom Contact. Contact MCI Telecommunications Corporation at (888) 258 -0808 prior to any excavation in the Right -of -Nay. j) Flag Protection. Flag Protection shall be required when PERMITTEE's operations on or adjacent to the Railroad Right -of -Way present a danger to BOARD's rail facilities. BOARD shall determine the need for Flag Protection in its sole discretion. Prior to entry onto the R/W, PERMITTEE shall complete the "Flag Protection Right -of -Way Work Request" form, attached hereto as Exhibit `B ". PERIVIITTEE agrees to execute time cards as required by BOARD personnel providing Flag Protection services. k) PERMITTEE's Obligations to Construct Improvements. PERMITTEE shall: 1) Comply with all requirements and conditions imposed by a public entity having jurisdiction over the work and all building permits, and any amendments thereto. 2) Complete, at PERMITTEE's own expense, all the public improvement work required by any public entity having jurisdiction over the work. 3) Complete the work on or before December 1, 2001 unless a time extension is granted by the BOARD. 1) Inspection and Acceptance. Upon completion of the work the PERMITTEE shall request a final inspection by the BOARD. If the BOARD determines that the work has been completed in accordance with this Permit Agreement, they shall certify the completion of the improvements. No improvements shall be accepted unless all aspects of the work have been inspected and determined to have been completed in accordance with the Improvement Plans and applicable standards. PERMITTEE shall bear all costs of inspection and certification. m) Alteration to Improvement Plans. 1) Any changes, alterations or additions to the improvement plans and specifications shall be approved by BOARD. 2) The PERMITTEE shall construct the improvements in accordance with all applicable standards in effect at the time of their construction or as modified when necessary to protect the public safety or welfare or comply with applicable state or federal law or zoning ordinances. n) Injury to Public Improvements, Public Property or Public Utility Facilities. PERMITTEE shall replace or repair all public improvements, public utilities and surveying or subdivision monuments which are destroyed or damaged as a result of any work under this Agreement. PERMITTEE shall bear the entire cost of replacement or repairs of any and all public or public utility property damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done under this Agreement, whether such property be owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the State of California, or any agency, district or political subdivision thereof or by the BOARD or any public or private utility corporation or by any combination of such owners. Any repair or replacement shall be to the satisfaction, and subject to the approval of, the BOARD. Page 7 4/18/01 MP 237.50 01 -SD -01 GREYSTONE HOMES o) Permits. PERMITTEE shall, at PERMITTEE's expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction and installation of the improvements, give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law. 13. Default of PERMITTEE. a) Default of PERMITTEE in performance of the work shall include, but not be limited to, PERMITTEE's failure to timely complete construction of the work; PERMITTEE's failure to cure any defect in the work; PERMITTEE's failure to perform substantial construction work for a period of 20 calendar days after commencement of the work; PERMITTEE's insolvency, appointment of a receiver, or the filing of any petition in bankruptcy either voluntary or involuntary which PERMITTEE fails to discharge within 30 days; the commencement of a foreclosure action against the PERMITTEE's property used in the work or a portion thereof, or any conveyance in lieu or in avoidance of foreclosure; or the termination of this Permit Agreement pursuant to Paragraph 2, above. b) BOARD may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or by any other method BOARD may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of PERMITTEE, and PERMITTEE shall be liable to BOARD for any excess cost or damages occasioned thereby; and, in such event, BOARD, without liability for so doing, may take possession of, and utilize in completing the work such materials, appliances, plant and other property belonging to PERMITTEE as may be on the site of the work and necessary for performance of the work. PERMITTEE agrees not to remove such property from the site. c) In the event that PERMITTEE fails to perform any obligation under this Paragraph 13, PERMITTEE agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by BOARD in obtaining performance of such obligations, including costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees. d) The failure of BOARD to take an enforcement action with respect to a default of any provision of this Paragraph 13, or to declare a breach, shall not be construed as a waiver of that default or any subsequent default of PERMITTEE. 14. Emergency Number. PERMITTEE shall notify the Dispatcher immediately if the tracks become fouled in any way. The dispatcher's number is (800) 500 -7346 or (323) 259- 6300. 15. Modification of Agreement. This Agreement and any provision, covenant, condition, or restriction contained herein may be terminated, extended, modified, or amended with the unanimous consent of the Parties. No such termination, extension, modification or amendment will be effective until a written instrument setting forth its terms has been executed by all of the Parties. 16. Covenant of Non - Discrimination. By its signature on this Agreement, each Party covenants for itself, and its successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under and through them, that there shall be no discrimination or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of sex, marital status, race, color, creed, religion, national origin, or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of any portion of the Right -of- Way. 17. Miscellaneous. Page 8 4/18/01 MP 237 50 01 -SD -01 GREYSTONE HOMES a) Table of Contents and Captions The captions of this Agreement are inserted only as a matter of convenience and for reference. It does not define, limit or describe the scope of intent of this Agreement, and they shall not affect the interpretation thereof. b) Agreement for Exclusive Benefit of Parties Except where expressly provided otherwise in this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement are for the exclusive benefit of the Parties hereto and not for the benefit of any other person nor shall this Agreement be deemed to have conferred any rights, express or implied, upon any other person. Neither PERVIITTEE, its heirs, legal representatives, successors or assigns, nor any subsequent assignee, shall assign this Permit or any interest herein, without first securing the written consent of BOARD in each instance, and that at the option of BOARD, this Permit shall be forfeited by any such unauthorized assignment, transfer or lease or by any assignment or transfer thereof by operation of law. c) Waiver of Default A waiver by any Party of any default by another Party must be in writing, and no such waiver shall be implied from any omission by a Party to take any action in respect of such default. No express written waiver of any default shall affect any default or cover any period of time other than the default and period of time specified in such express waiver. One or more written waivers of any default in the performance of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default in the performance of the same provision or any other term or provisions contained herein. The consent or approval by a Party to or of any act or request by another Party requiring consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the consent or approval to or of any subsequent similar acts or requests. d) No Partnership, Joint Venture or Principal -Agent Relationship Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed by the Parties hereto, or any of them, or by any third person, to create the relationship of principal and agent, or of joint venture, or of partnership between or among any of the Parties under this Agreement. e) Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns of the Parties. 0 Governing Laws. This Agreement shall be construed, interpreted, governed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. g) Consents. Except as otherwise may be provided in this Agreement, whenever a Party is requested to consent to or approve of any matter with respect to which its consent or approval is required by this Agreement, such consent or approval, if given, shall be given in writing. Whenever a Party is required to obtain the consent or approval of any other Party, such consent or approval shall not be unreasonably withheld and shall be given in writing within a reasonable period of time; provided however, that this provision shall not apply where the Agreement specifically states that such consent or approval may be unreasonably withheld or is subject to the sole discretion of the Party or words of similar import. h) Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. i) Time of Essence. Time is of the essence with respect to the performance of each of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement. j) Exhibits. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are incorporated herein by reference. In addition, all Parties acknowledge and agree that all exhibits attached hereto that are Page 9 ;/18/01 MP 237.50 01 -SD -01 GREYSTONE HOMES diagrammatic in format are intended to depict the general location of the items set forth therein and not the exact location of such items. k) Severability. If any clause, sentence, or other portion of the terms, conditions, covenants, and restrictions of this Agreement becomes or is declared to be illegal, null, or void for any reason, or be held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be so, the remaining portions of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect. 1) BOARD Agents. Except as otherwise provided in this Permit Agreement, the term BOARD shall include BOARD's staff and independent agents employed by the BOARD. 18. No object which can be moved by two persons shall be left on the Right -of -Way unattended. This requirement also applies to objects above and/or outside the Right -of -Way on the uphill side which can be thrown or rolled downhill onto the track(s). 19. BE ADVISED THAT IT IS A MISDEMEANOR UNDER PENAL CODE SECTION 555 TO ENTER OR REMAIN UPON RAILROAD PROPERTY WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE OWNER. IT IS ALSO A MISDEMEANOR UNDER PENAL CODE SECTION 3691 TO WORK WITHIN 20 FEET OF A RAIL LINE WITHOUT PERMISSION (FLAG PROTECTION IS REQUIRED). IN EACH CASE, ALL INDIVIDUALS VIOLATING THESE SECTIONS WILL BE SUBJECT TO A FINE OF UP TO 51,000 AND /OR IMPRISONMENT OF UP TO SIX MONTHS. PERMITTEE: NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY GREYSTONE HOMES, INC., A TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD DELAWARE CORPORATION 810 Mission Ave. Oceansidet CA 92054 By: 61 Page 10 4/18/01 JOB NAME: BILLABLE PARTY: - ---- -� PERMIT/LICENSE NO AMTRAK WORK ELE�. .r: 02 -,SC) -0I FLAG PROTECTION RIGHT -OF -WAY WORK REQUEST 1. Work performed on the San Diego Northern Railway ( "SDNR ") RIGHT -OF -WAY which involves personnel or equipment must have an NCTD /SDNR- supplied flagperson for duration of the work, unless specifically waived by NCTD /SDNR. Cost of the flag person shall be borne by the party requesting the work. Depending on the extent of the work, SDNR may require the requesting party to provide a deposit to cover the estimated cost of the flag protection. ................ ..... _ .......... --._.__ ................... .................................... ......... ................ ..........._... 2. Work Request form MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND RETURNED TO NCTD A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THE WORK. PLEASE RETURN FORM TO North San Diego County Transit Development Board 810 Mission Avenue Oceanside, CA 92054 Attention CHIP WILLETT PHONE: (760) 966 -6504 FAX: 17601 754 -9403 Attention: BILL RABELLO PHONE: (760) 966 -6519 FAX: (7601 433 -3082 ._._._. ....... - ..................... -- .......... _ ......... _ ...... --- ... _ ......................... ......... ...................... ...... --.._ ..... __ ..... _ ... _._ ... _ ........ ........................................................... ............... -- - - -... 3. Depending on the nature of the work, SDNR may request a meeting at the job site prior to approving the work request. ................................... _ ........... ....... ............ ..... _ ......................................... - ............... _ ................... ................ .................. -........................................................._........ ......._.............._......._ 4. Contractor shall sign time cards of personnel providing flag protection. 5. There will be a minimum charge of four hours for any job. Any job that requires from four to eight hours will be charged a minimum of eight hours. NAME OF CONTRACTOR: PHONE: BILLABLE PARTY: Address: City: State: Zip: PURPOSE OF WORK: LOCATION OF WORK: EQUIPMENT TO BE USED: WORK START DATE: TIME: COMPLETION DATE: TIME: PERSON IN CHARGE AT WORK SITE: CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE: DATE: APPROVED BY: DATE: PRINT NAME: MP g� rL" REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Date: 4 L' Sent to: ❑ Eastern Region Risk Manager Fax # (305) 228 -5588 Western Region Risk Manager Fax # (949) 206 -9427 From: Division or Co. Named Insured: c�+lsirlE�tt=S r�IG (Lennar Co. Entity) Type of Insurance: 'Q Liability ❑ Work Comp Z7 Auto ❑ Trailer ❑ Fidelity (Check all that apply) ❑ Property ❑ Computer Equipment ❑ Other • Unit Owner: (As it applies to closings 8 refinances and Model Sale Leasebacks) Note: If a model sale leaseback, indicate expected lease termination date: Property Address/ Community: iAL-G� OR • Regarding: Y ML L Attti� 22�% ie: job name/number, equipment info; trailer, etc.) Certificate Holder: Nc4z-h# be =:ccl CrtlNb4 (Entity requesting proof of insurance)`Y'C -+�� Special Items: ❑ Addt'I Insured ❑ Loss Payee ❑ Waiver of Subrogation (Check all that apply) -�c.J ,t L�O_ther{,' ntt ,1L-v�J - �11`�`�XL:EaZ__ 24 .h:- .i.caS MiG 5 ?cam �1C tnPn PRE 44� -fi2R ^t.S 5 tR > +n.t '> 24 1t0tit1i'5 5[ t-Wk Note: (f possible, attach written certificate request contract requirements. Fax copy to Mail original to: e— ► I S F scL, `76-,- • E-c 4 -1-1 1lv Need by: 4 7- I ' C Exhibit 15. R.1 Rev. 1/12/00 CONSTRUCTION BOND ESTIMATE PAGE 1 OF 4 PROJECT NAME: BAY LAUREL JOB NO: 57142.10 S B & O, INC. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 82123 (858) 560 -1141 (858) 56D -8157 FAX NO. OF LOTS: 46 W.O.: EST. BY. RLF/MC DATE: 0411VVI CKD. BY DJO DATE: 04111rt71 BAY LAUREL TM: DWG. NO.: 6775 -IR, 6775 -GR RESOLUTIONNO. SUMMARY This is a cost estimate based upon City of San Diego unit prices as of SEPTEMBER 1990, the amounts shown are furnished for the purpose of establishing bond amounts only and ma not reflect the true cost of the work, The engineer is not responsible for fluctuations in the cost of labor, material or components, A BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF WILL SATISFY THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 2, CHAPTER X OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE QaOFt sb IMPROVEMENT OF: P S. 0119 T 'a �= No. 47677 m m It Erp. 12 -31 -03 a kp CrvN. AUF ESTIMATED TIME OF COMPLETION IS DATE FOR CONTROL ENGINEER APPROVED. RC. E. NO. DATE SUMMARY SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $346,367 WATER $208,536 SEWER $231,541 GRADING $610,3677 SOFT COSTS 0 TOTAL COST $1,396,811 LAND DEVELOPMENT BOND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BOND TOTAL BOND O l5]111RepgT�lLbsl Esfi a(g.D] 1 f Ary -0I 0 0 3; m ti w 0 7. 0 0 u 0 0 J ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PROJECT NAME: BAY LAUREL JOB . / s B & • 3815 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 DIEGO, :1 (858) 560-81S7 FAX • • • �• EST BY RLFIMC DATE�04111101 • BY. . • . 04111101 BAY LAUREL GRADING DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES TOTAL M�Wmmo� Al I 0, 0 r H m J Ti 0 0 rr� V D 111101W�[alelW. Fu(n�h �] 1 f�Ap01 �.�� ., ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PR NAME: BAYLAUREL J06 NO. 57142.10 S9&0,INC. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 660 -1141 (850) 560 -8157 FAX NO, b EST. BY: F : 04111/01 CKD. BY: DJO DATE-WIllol BAY LAUREL IMPROVEMENTS DWG. NO. 67754R ITEM DESCRIP77ON QUANTITIES QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT BOND PRICE BOND AMOUNT SH3 S 5 6 H7 SH SH9 SH10 S 11 AC. PAVING 6 BAS 0 -S 13,296 29079 9078 51,453 SF $2.65 $136,350 2 . PAVING B BASE (V B S) 5 10,887 35,038 F $2.b5 92,851 3 SIDEWALK G -7 1,602 4,513 2,050 .8,365 SF $3.25 $27186 4 PED RAMPS 6-27 3 2 ✓ 5 EA 51,050.00 5,250 5 ROLLED G4 CURB 484 1,299 1,568 644 ✓3 995 LF i 3.75 54,931 6 6" TYPE -G- CURB G -2 41 4f 1 LF $J3.75 $5, 7 CR SS GUTTERS G -12 14 434 .,y 2,050 SF $5.00 J10,,. 8 18"R TORMDRAIN 57 167 10 c 0 LF $84.00 $31,04a 9 24 "R P STORM DRAIN 55 - 55 LF 95.00 $5,225 }0 30'RCP TORM DRAIN 329 LF 110.00 $36, 190 11 4 "PVCSTORM 242 242 LF 816.25 ,933 12 6" PVC STORM D 1N 17 17 LF 137.00 $ 29 13 8" PVC STORM IN 105 105 LF 837.00 $ ,885 14 f2 "PVCS RM ORAf 93 LF $37.00 3,441 15 TYPE A-4- S.0, CLEANOUTS D-9 1 ! } EA $3,675.00 $11,025 16 TYPE IF, CATCHBASIN D -7 1 1 EA $3400.00 $3,400 17 PE "A" D-25 CURB OUTLET 1 1 EA $2 240.00 $2,240 18 PE "B "INLET 1 1 EA $3,650.00 $3,850 19 TYPE -2 "INLET 2 2 A $3,850.00 $7,700 20 WALL "4 1 } EA $3,970.00 3,970 21 CONTROL STRUC 1 1 EA $3.980.00 13,980 22 TYPE 'G- 1'CATCHBASI 1 1 EA 3,700.00 $3,700 23 TRENCH RESURFACING 62 2 LF $23.00 $1,426 24 SAWCUT 50 F J3.00 $150 25 A.C. DEMOLITION 4630 _ 4,630 SF $0.85 J3,936 26 .C. BERM 105 105 LF $8.20 27 SURVEY MONUMENT M -10 -17 !7 EA $420.00 7, 28 A.C. DWYEXT 3 A 4-UL 1; BA 1705 1,705 SF $2.65 $4,5#- 29 CHAN CONN. S.D.R.S.D. 0-73 2 2 EA $600.00 1,200 30 BUS SHELTER 1 ). p• 1 EA $5 $5000 3 1 STALLR -26 SIGN 6 1 ♦ B EA Sr 200.00 ,coo 32 INSTALL R -1 SIGN 1 y 1 EA $200.00 260 33 m -74 JAU111 SUBTOTAL $346,367 10% CON 1. 134,637 TOTAL 381004 C ALIT v m 0 Y W a m I a N m N W 0 0 6! rq N,yl,YnR PFr "M1. W ) rww-0 5r'vt fi Z 0 0 0 0 H BOND NO. 11141740222 PREMIUM: $1,334.00 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (Subdivision) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, Greystone Homes, Inc., as Principal, and The American Insurance Company as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Three Hundred Eighty One Thousand Four and no /100 Dollars ($381,004.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE FOREGOING OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, Whereas, said Principal has entered into an Agreement with said Obligee for Bay Laurel, Tract 98 -240 in which said Principal agrees to construct improvements as follows: Miscellaneous Improvements and, as a condition of approving said Subdivision, the Principal is required to give a bond to guarantee completion of said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly do and perform all the covenants and obligations of said agreement on its part to be done and performed at the time and in the manner specified therein, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. Signed and sealed on April 25, 2001. GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. a Delaware corporation By: THE AME AN INSURANCE COMPANY Patricia Brebner, Attorney -in -Fact Subperf CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of California County of Orange On April 27, 2001 before me, S. McDonald, Notary Public, personally appeared David Evans, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted. executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. , corm Notary IC - Cc -. nio mange County it My Comm. u4lTt Apr 7 d, 370! OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: Corporate Officer— Vice President Grevstone Homes Inc. DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Type of Document: Faithful Performance Bond No. 111 4174 0222 Number of Pages: One (1) Date of Document: April 25, 2001 Signers (other than those named above): Patricia Brebner CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE A( WLEDGMENT State of California County of No 5907 On April 25, 2001 before me, Jeri Apodaca, Notary Public DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G.. "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC' personally appeared Patricia Brebner NAME(S) OF SIGNERS) ® personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the persons) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIG TURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) B LIMITED GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) R X&I-Yl DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 8236 Rem l Ave.. P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91 _ IREMANS FUND INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY AMERICAN AU'TOMOBU2 INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation, THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation redornesticated in Nebraska, ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION, a California corporation, and AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, (herein collectively called "the Companies") does each hereby appoint Patricia Brebner of Costa Mesa, CA their true and lawful Attomey(s }in -Fact, with full power of authority hereby confentd in their name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, recogni2ances or other written obligations in the nature thereof------ - - -- -- and to bind the Companies thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the corporate seals of the Companies and duly attested by the Companies' Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Attorney(s)-in-Fact tray do in the premises. This power of attorney is granted under and by the authority of Article VD of the By -laws of each of the Companies which provisions are now in full force and effect This power of attorney is signed and sealed under the authority of the following Resolutiop adopted by the Board of Directors of each of the Companies at a meeting duly called and held, or by written consent, on the 19th day of March, 1995, and said Resolution has not been amended or repealed. 'RESOLVED, that the signature of any Vice-President, Assistant Secretary, and Resident Assistant Secretary of the Companies, and the seal of the Companies may be affixed or printed on any power of attorney, on any revocation of any power of attorney, or on any certificate relating thereto, by facsimile, and any power of attorney, any revocation of any power of attorney, or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Companies." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused these presents to be signed by their Vice - President, and their corporate seals to be hereunto affixed this 30 day of January 2001 cll� FIREMAN 'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY etw L ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION �`nh� p f ANMERIC UTOMOBII.E INSURANCE COMPANY u STATE OF CALIFORNIA l SS. By COUNTY OF MARIN f V=- Praiem On this 30 day of January 2 0 01 , before me personally came Donn R. Kolbeck to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he is a Vice - President of each company, described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seals of the said Companies: that the seals affixed to the said instrument are such company seals; that they were so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said companies and that he signed his name thereto by like order. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year huein first above written. KRISTIN kk GAZ Ll D Qn COMM. 0,252236 LL MARN NTY 1gTAR COUe�XIF0IWN 0 MARIN Q Mr came. E,�YU xfxY 29,1004 N STATE OF CALIFORNIA l SS, CERTIFICATE COUNTY OF MARIN f I, the undersigned, Resident Assistant Secretary of each company, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore that Article VI of the By -laws of each company, and the Resolution of the Board of Directors; set forth in the Power of Attorney, are now in force. Signed and sealed at the County of Marin. Dated the 25th day of April 2001 C(� ,aUq♦ YhNiI +�WUI�,` �ry�,�+Y�r"„� �O`�i� ��• i ` S •aw LiB Fr .crt avn A trq�7 �': f f � +^'cr N+ aVCl �ca� .tip Reside0l ASrisbOt$ BOND NO. 11141740230 PREMIUM: $1,709.00 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (Subdivision) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, Greystone Homes, Inc., as Principal, and The American Insurance Company as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Four Hundred Eighty Eight Thousand Two Hundred Ninety Four and no/I 00 Dollars ($488,294.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE FOREGOING OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, Whereas, said Principal has entered into an Agreement with said Obligee for Bay Laurel, Tract 98 -240 in which said Principal agrees to construct improvements as follows: Grading and, as a condition of approving said Subdivision, the Principal is required to give a bond to guarantee completion of said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly do and perform all the covenants and obligations of said agreement on its part to be done and performed at the time and in the manner specified therein, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. Signed and sealed on April 25, 2001. GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. a Delaware corporation By: THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY / � By: J Patricia Brebner, Attorney -in -Fact Subperf CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of California County of Orange On April 27, 2001 before me, S. McDonald, Notary Public, personally appeared David Evans, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. , _ commissioner= .d3� ss QWCoMMEX0re$ Notary Public - Ca:.'ornia Orange County Apr 7 d, a7DE OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: Corporate Officer — Vice President Greystone Homes, Inc. DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Type of Document: Faithful Performance Bond No. 111 4174 0230 Number of Pages: One 1 Date of Document: April 25, 2001 Signers (other than those named above): Patricia Brebner CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE AC WLEDGMENT State of Califomia County of On April 25, 2001 DATE personally appeared Patricia Brebner before me, Jeri Apodaca, Notary Public NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E G 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC" Np 5907 NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) ® personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument WITNESS my hand and official seal. RE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER ❑ PARTNER(S) B LIMITED GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ASSOCIATION • 8236 Park, CA 91309.7184 _.REMANS FUND INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation, THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation redomesticated in Nebraska, ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION, a California corporation, and AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, (herein collectively called "the Companies') does each hereby appoint Patricia Brebner of Costa Mesa, CA their true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact, with full power of authority hereby conferred in their name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, uodertalangs, recogni2ances or other written obligations in the nature thereof------ - - - - -- and to bind the Companies thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds were signed by the President. sealed with the corporate seals of the Companies and duly attested by the Companies' Secretary. hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Atromey(s }-Fact may do m the premises. This power of attorney is granted under and by the authority of Article VU of the By -laws of each of the Companies which provisions are now in full force and effect - This power of attorney is signed and sealed tinder the authority of the following Resolutiop adopted by the Board of Directors of each of the Companies at a meeting duly called and held, or by written consent, on the 19th day of Much, 1995, and said Resolution has not been amended or repealed: "RESOLVED, that the signature of any Vice-president, Assistant Secretary, and Resident Assistant. Secretary of the Companies, and the seal of the Companies may be affixed or printed on any power of attorney, on any revocaon of any power of attorney. or on any certificate relating thereto, by facsimile, and any power of attorney, any revocation of any power of attorney, or certificate beating such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Companies." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused these presents to be signed by their Vice-president, and their corporate seals to be hereunto affixed this 30 day of Jarlllary 2001 FIREMAN'S FOND INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ASSOCIATED MEMNITY" CORPORATION OKU CS-1) ni p�f AMEBIC UTOMOBBB INSURANCE COMPANY STATE OF CALDFORNLA SS. COUNTY OF MARIN } yKe -Pies erne On this 30 day of January 2 001 , before me Personally came Donn R. Kolbeck to me known, who, being by me duly swam, did depose and say: that he is a Vice - President of each company. described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seals of the said Companies: that the seals affixed to the said instrument are such company seals; that they were so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said companies and that he signed his name thereto by like order. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year herein first above written. KRISTIN A GAZZOU D (, WM.01707236 dNOT Ypu&jc_rALIFOM1A Q Q MT hMVn En ku A(A 29.2m y N STATE OF CALIFORNIA i SS, CERTIFICATE COUNTY OF MARIN f I, the undersigned, Resident Assistant Secretary of each company, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force and has not been revoked; and hutbermote that Article VII of the By -laws of each company, and the Resolution of the Board of Directors; set forth in the Power of Attorney, are now in force. Signed and sealed at the County of Mann. Dated the 25th day of April 2001 rert scm n _ 3'81AL., Resident AsssMat S Banko # America %j DATE: APRIL 26, 2001 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER: 3037365 BENEFICIARY APPLICANT CITY OF ENCINITAS LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA 505 S. VULCAN AVENUE 24800 CHRISANTA ENCINITAS, CA 92024 -3633 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 AMOUNT USD 122,074.00 ONE HUNDRED TWENTY TWO THOUSAND SEVENTY FOUR AND 00 1100'S US DOLLARS EXPIRATION APRIL 26, 2002 AT OUR COUNTERS GENTLEPERSONS: WE HEREBY ESTABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 3037365 IN THE AMOUNT OF ONE HUNDRED TWENTY TWO THOUSAND SEVENTY FOUR AND 00 1100'S US DOLLARS ($122,074.00) IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "CITY ", ISSUED IN CONNECTION WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF GRADING APPLICATION 67756R ENTERED INTO BETWEEN CITY AND GREYSTONE HOMES, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "PRINCIPAL ", COVERING CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS OR WORK TO BE INSTALLED OR DONE IN OR FOR THAT CERTAIN SUBDIVISION KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS BAY LAUREL BY PRINCIPAL AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID GRADING PERMIT. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS AVAILABLE TO CITY AGAINST CITY'S DRAFT(S) DRAWN AT SIGHT ON US WHEN ACCOMPANIED BY: CITY WRITTEN STATEMENT (SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY MANAGER, OR CITY ATTORNEY) CERTIFYING THAT THERE HAS BEEN FAILURE OF THE PRINCIPAL TO FAITHFULLY PERFORM THE ABOVE AGREEMENT AND FURTHER THAT THE AMOUNT OF THE DRAFT ACCOMPANYING THIS STATEMENT IS NOW DUE AND PAYABLE. PARTIAL DRAWINGS ARE PERMITTED. ALL DRAFTS UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL BE MARKED "DRAWN UNDER IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 3037365 ISSUED BY BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 333 SOUTH BEAUDRY AVENUE, 19T" FLOOR, LOS ANGELES, CA 90017, MAIL CODE: CA9- 703- 19 -23. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT EXPIRES (1) ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE HEREOF AND SHALL BE DEEMED AUTOMATICALLY EXTENDED WITHOUT AMENDMENT FOR A (1) ONE —YEAR PERIOD UPON SUCH DATE AND UPON EACH ANNIVERSARY OF SUCH DATE, UNLESS AT LEAST SIXTY (60) DAYS PRIOR TO SUCH DATE OR EACH ANNIVERSARY OF SUCH DATE WE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IN WRITING BY REGISTERED MAIL OR BY OVERNIGHT COURIER THAT WE ELECT NOT TO SO EXTEND THIS LETTER OF CREDIT. UPON RECEIPT BY CITY OF SUCH NOTICE CITY MAY AUTOMATICALLY DRAW THE FULL AMOUNT REMAINING ON THIS LETTER OF CREDIT BY A CLEAN DRAFT, WITH NO SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS, AND BANK WILL PAY CITY UPON RECEIPT OF SUCH DRAFT. B.k OfA.wa. N.A. Trail l,,, m Mail CN¢ (AW101.0.IN U] 5. NroWrr Avmte. 141h tl "x. I rn.1npclw. t n ghll' ORIGINAL 011, a4i5- nm ?NSx u- IV�_cnv w :J1 Recycled Paper Bankof America %j PAGE: 2 THIS IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER: 3037365 WE EXPRESSLY AGREE WITH CITY THAT ALL DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL MEET WITH DUE HONOR UPON PRESENTATION. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS, 1993 REV., PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, ICC PUBLICATION 500 TO THE EXTENT IT IS NOT INCONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE LAW OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA. IF YOU REQUIRE ANY ASSISTANCE OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS TRANSACTION, PLEASE CALL 213 - 345 -6605. MANUEL BANUELOS SR. AUTHORIZED OFFICER ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES EUNSON BAE SR. AUTHORIZED OFFICER THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS 26T" DAY OF APRIL 2001 BY MANUEL BANUELOS — SR. AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND EUNSON BAE — SR. AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, WHO ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THAT HE /SHE EXECUTED THE SAME, AS ITS AUTHORIZED AGENT, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION /ASSOCIATION. NOTARt PUBLIC M k nFA... F A. TM Op .., Mnl(` a ('A9- +U419- 333 S BAWry Avenue. I9rh Fh .. Lin Anpelea, ('A WM 17 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: /C //I, /03 ORIGINAL CESYI B. BUTIUyMf Comrnhsbn p 1138166 N&cry.P6b11c'— Ca1Nanto Los Angela County W Cunt. D0M Ctf 16,2= Is nnas.omzrase 9 -.9W rn9'° y: Recycled Paper ENGINEERS ESTIMATE PROJECT .: . E :. SAN DIEGO, 1 (858) 560-8157 FAX .. ,. .: .. .. BAY LAUREL SEWER BOND AMOUNT SEWER M.H. IN EXIST. O L4IIITRIwN.ICOI/EMmIM1...0) II Ae 01 S)Ii) ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PROJECT NAME: BAY LAUREL JOB NO: 57142.10 S B & O, INC. 3616 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 560 -1141 (858) 560 -8157 FAX NO. OF LOTS: 46 W.O.: EST. BY: RLF/MC DATE: 04111/01 CKO. BY.' DJO DATE: 04111/01 BAY LAUREL WATER DWG. NO.: 6775 -IR ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT D E BOND AMOUNT SH 3 SH 4 SH 5 SH 6 SH 7 SH 8 I 1 8" WATER MAIN -21 15 383 640 320 1,356 LF .00 S75,--61-6 2 1 "WATER SERVICES W -2) 14 23 9 46 EA 0.00 $28,960 8" WATER VALVE 1 2 5 8 EA .00 $13,600 4 6" FIRE HYDRA NTASSEMBLY 1 2 3 EA 0.00 V$3,5OO�00 $11,550 5 STEEL CASING 160 160 LF .00 $16,000 6 2- BLOW-OFF ASS Y. P -4 2 1 3 EA .00 $2,595 7 2" M.A R. ASSY. (P -10 2 3 5 EA .00 $2,750 8 12' WATER VALVE 2 2 EA .00 $7,000 9 2" WATER SERVICE 1 1 EA 0.00 $1,150 10 4" WATER MAIN 254 152 406 LF 8.00 $11,368 11 REMOVEEXISTINGFH 1 1 EA ,0.00 $2,000 12 REM OVE EXISTING WM 3 3 EA $250.00 $750 13 CONNECT WM TO PROP. WL 6 6 EA $250.00 $1,500 14 12 "WATERMAIN 313 313 LF $63.00 $19,719 F � R m a SUBTOTAL $189,578 10 %CONT. $18,958 TOTAL $208,536 0 W 1411@, W L lCUfI Elliman/.m Hdd41 V142 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT city �f Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment /Sfonnwafer Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering April 19, 2001 Graystone Homes Inc. 5780 Fleet Street Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Case 98 -240 TM /CDP /EIR (46 SFD lot subdivision at the northeast corner of Vulcan Ave. and Sanford St.) Grading Application 6775GR [Precise Grading /Erosion Control] Improvement Application 677SIR [Public Road /Drain] A.P.N. 254- 052 -12,13 254 -010 -7,24 254- 102 -51 Permit issuance requirements This correspondence shall serve to briefly summarize the Engineering Permit process. Drawings 6775 -G and 6775 -1, and the corresponding checkprints and draft documents, have been returned to the Engineer of Work, subject to corrections. Upon resubmittal, the revised plans are subject to approval by the Director of Engineering Services and will remain valid for three years. In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per these Drawings, you will need to satisfy the following requirements: (1) Obtain all plan approvals. Then provide 4 blueline copies of each approved Drawing. (2) Post Security Deposits as follows: (a)GRADING PERMIT... in the amount of $610,367.00 to guarantee performance of earthwork, site retaining walls, private drainage improvements, and erosion control, (b)IMPROVEMENT PERMIT... in the amount of $381,004.00 to guarantee performance of public road and drainage improvements, and Up to 80% of the amount in 2(a) and 100% of the amounts in 2(b) may be in the form of a Performance Band, and, in the case of deferred monuments, a Labor and Materials Bond, issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Twenty percent of the amount in 2(a) has to be in the form of cash, certificates of deposit, a letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Any financial instrument's format is subject to approval. (3) Pay an additional Plan Check Fee of $205.70. (4) Pay non - refundable Inspection Fees and an Inspection Deposit, the latter subject to cost recovery, respectively, as follows: (a)GRADING PERMIT... of $20,311.00, NIMPROVEMENT PERMIT... of $13,430.00, and (5) Provide the name, address, telephone number, and state license number of the construction contractor. Construction and repair of public improvements and installation of the sewer lateral are restricted to qualified contractors. Depending on the work to be done, the contractor will need to possess as follows either a valid: Bfrcaseno.98- 2401,grastone.doc 1 TEL 760- 633 -26001 FAX 760 -633 -2627 qii 1 Vulcan A+enu,. Lnciuiias- ('.alifornia 926 `a -V,33 -1DD "6063 i -2 -1)n recycled paper (a) Type "A" General Engineering, any work, (b) Type "C -8" Concrete, apron, curb, gutter, and sidewalk, (c) Type "C -12" Grading & Paving, any surface improvement, (d) Type "C -32" Parking & Highway Improvement, signage and striping, or (e) Type "C -34" Pipeline, any sanitary sewer and storm drainage, state license, and meet the minimum insurance requirements as stated on the accompanying handout. (6) Provide a work schedule. (7) Sign the Permits and Right -of -way Standard Conditions. Any authorized representative of the property owner may sign. Permits are valid for no more than one year and may expire earlier due to expirations on letters of credit and /or insurance policies. Once the Engineering Permits are issued, advance notice of 48 hours must be given prior to you or your contractor scheduling the mandatory pre- construction conference. See Grading Note #9 and Improvement Note #15. Informal phasing of the project may necessitate more than one such conference. Trench repair for public water improvements and installation of the sewer lateral is allowed per the Improvement Permit, provided the contractor remains the same. The pipe and pipe zone are the jurisdiction of the San Dieguito Water District, by separate arrangement, and Encinitas Sanitary Division, per the Sewer Construction Permit. Please make the appropriate contact. A separate Right -of -way Construction Permit will be required for any work in the public right - of -way of Encinitas Boulevard that is not shown on the approved Drawings. Typically, this work may include excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install electric, gas, telephone, and cable television services. A Permit Fee of $250.0 0 per application and a site plan, preferably that drawn by the public utility, will be required. The contractor license and insurance requirements will remain unchanged. Permits must be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the start of work. Haul Routes, the Traffic Engineering Division handles Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits. An acceptable Traffic Control Plan will be required prior to the start of any work within the Encinitas Boulevard right -of -way. A typical plan shows all delineation, tapering, advance signage, temporary striping, barricades, flagman positions, and provides a schedule of operations. Contact Raymond Guames, Engineering Technician, at (760) 633 -2704. Construction changes, prepared by the Engineer of Work, should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposit. Prior to issuance of any Building Permit, a rough grading approval will be needed from the assigned Engineering Inspector. At a minimum, rough grading is defined as certified pad preparation and soil compaction, substantial completion of improvements, and safe access. As- builts of Drawing 6775 -G and Drawing 6775 -1, prepared by the Engineer of Work and approved by the Engineering Services Department, will be required prior to Final Inspection of the Grading Permit and Acceptance Inspection of the Improvement Permit. Bfrcaseno.98 -2401, grastone. doc2 Satisfactory completion of Final Inspections is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposits assigned to both the Grading Permit and the Sewer Construction Permit. Please note that Building Permit final inspections are a separate event apart from any Engineering Permit final inspection and are not necessarily coincidental. Satisfactory conclusion of Acceptance Inspection and formal acceptance by the City Council is a prerequisite to a reduction in the Security Deposit guaranteeing performance of public road and drainage improvements and start of the mandatory one -year Warranty Period. The retention will be held for the duration of the Warranty Period and will be released only after the satisfactory completion of a Warranty Inspection. The Warranty Inspection cannot be scheduled until after the expiration of the Warranty Period. This letter is limited in scope. During the Building Permit process, you will need services and be subject to regulation from as follows: the Current Planning Division, Building Inspection Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, San Dieguito Water District, and Encinitas Sanitary Division, all of the City, and the Encinitas Union School District and San Dieguito Union High School District, all separate public agencies. Please inquire at their respective counters. Additional engineering requirements will be forthcoming during the Building Permit process, including, but not necessarily limited to, coordination of the building site plan with the grading plan, resolution of any outstanding public improvement issues, and assessment and collection of Flood control, sanitary sewer, and traffic mitigation fees. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2783, or you may wish to visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center. Sincerely, Duane Thompson Associate Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering cc SB &O, Inc., Engineer of Work Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Mel Chappell, Engineering Inspector Gary Lee, Engineering Technician permittfile enc B frcasen o.98- 240I,grastone. doc3 c::>.Zorm UKLTb IUNL HUMLb NU. ur,> r -- il RESOLUTION NO. PC2000 -63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE DE$jGN.R -MEW PERMIT FOR A 46 LOT SUBDI' THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF VUL-CAIVAVEN SANFORD STREET DEC 2 1 2000 (CASE NO. 98 -240 DR; APN: 254.052-12 & 13, 254 - 101•7 & 24, 254`1 4 V," or E =L WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Design Review Permit was filed by Greystone Homes to allow a 46 lot subdivision and 2.5 acre neighborhood park, in accordance with Chapter 23.08 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, for the property located in the R -8 Zone and Residential 8 Land Use Designation, legally described as: That portion of Lot 7 in BIock 21 of North Leucadia, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 524, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, April 6, 1888, and as completely described in the Grant Deed dated August 27, 1999, Document 990466177. (Perry) All of Lots 7 to 10 inclusive and portion of Lots 6 and 11 in Block 27, together with a portion of Sanford Street and Juno Avenue, and also a portion of the alley in said Block 27, as said Street, Avenue and Alley were vacated and closed to public use on November 19, 1915, by Order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego, a certified copy of which said order was recorded December 26, 1916 in Book 500, page 343 of Deeds, in the Office of the Recorder of said San Diego County, all being in North Leucadia, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Map thereof No 524, filed in the Office of the Recorder of said San Diego County, April 6, 1888, and as completely described in the Grant Deed dated July 9, 1969, Document # 115231. (Hall) All of Lots 2 to 15 inclusive and a portion of Lots I and 16 in Block 27, together with a portion of Sanford Street and Juno Avenue, and also a portion of the alley in said Block 27, as said Street, Avenue and Alley were vacated and closed to the public use in November 19, I915, by order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego, a certified copy of which said order was recorded December 26, 1916, in Book 500, page 343 of Deeds, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County; all being in North Leucadia, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Maps thereofNo. 524, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on April 6, 1888, and as completely described in the Grant Deed dated September 21, 1964, Document #191847. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing on the application on June 15, 2000, a continued hearing on June 29, 2000, and a re- noticed public hearing on October 5, 2000, at which time all those desiring to be heard were heard; and psrNCdd/&/ruNpC200063 gr dr fin+d.doc I NUv.=. GU'U C - :.i l br.LT�IUIYL NUMLb Hu. VJ /.i r'.A /1`J WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered, without limitation: 1. The June 15, 2000, and June 29, 2000, Planning Commission Agenda Reports with attachments; 2. The October 5, 2000, Planning Commission Agenda Report and subsequent modifications; 3. The General Plan, Local Coastal Program, North 101 Corridor Specific Plan, Municipal Code, and associated Land Use Maps; 4, Oral evidence submitted at the hearing; 5. Written evidence submitted at the hearing; 6 The Design Review drawings, including: Design Review Site Plan titled "Site Plan `Bay Laurel "' dated received by the City on October 5, 2000, consisting of 1 sheet; Floor Plans and Elevations titled "Bay Laurel at Leucadia" dated received by the City on October 2, 2000, consisting of 41 sheets; Landscape Plan titled "Preliminary Landscape Plan Bay Laurel" dated received by the City on October 5, 2000, consisting of 5 sheets, and Material Boards dated received by the City on October 5, 2000, consisting of 15 boards. 7, Final Environmental Impact Report; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings pursuant to Chapter 23.08 (Design Review Permit) of the Encinitas Municipal Code; (SEE ATTACHMENT "A ") NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Encinitas hereby approves application Case #98 -240 DR for the Design Review Perrait subject to the following conditions: (SEE ATTACHMENT "B ") BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission, in its independent judgment, finds the project to be consistent with the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) certified by the City Council on September 13, 2000, by Resolution No. 2000 -61, since the number of single - family lots has been reduced to 46 with a 2.5 acre park while maintaining the basic subdivision design previously analyzed by the Final EIR. As such, it is determined that no additional environmental documentation is needed, NUV. cc. c1600 c; ZAYM U LYb IUNL HUML7 NU.Ur_ N. tii i7 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5'" day of October 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Bagg, Birnbaum, Jacobson NAYS: None. ABSENT: Crosthwaite, Patton ABSTAIN: None, Alice Jacobson, Chair of the Encinit4Jtnning Commission ATTEST: Sandra Holder r Secretary NOTE: This action is subject to Chapter I.04 of the Municipal Code, which specifies time limits for legal challenges. psrWcdd/yresolpc200063 gr dr final.doc 3 Nuv.ec.GI'!U'U' a; 54t'M k.KLT51UNL HUML5 NU. 0r:J Y. b/PJ ATTACHMENT "A" Resolution No. PC2000 - 63 Case No. 98 -240 DR FINDINGS FOR DESIGN REVIEW STANDARD Section 23.08.072 of the Encinitas Municipal Code provides that an application for a design review permit must he granted unless, based upon the information presented in the application and during the Public Bearing, the authorized agency makes any of the following regulatory conclusions: a. The project design is inconsistent with the General Plan, a Specific Plan, or the provisions of the Municipal Code. Facts/Discussion: It is recognized that a new project has difficulty matching the existing character of a community. The project will be noticeably different; however, with the various floor plans (5), elevations (4 per floor plan), color options (15 color schemes), and customizing options (room and porch extensions), no two homes will be identical within the subdivision. In addition, rooflines and pitches vary, and landscaping is added that provides a thick and informal appearance. The subdivision provides for a neighborhood park and a street design that reflects elements of Leucadia, i.e., stub (dead - end) streets, narrow streets, and no streetlights. The lots are typically smaller than the surrounding community, which also results in setbacks, lot coverage and floor area ratios that are different from the surrounding community; however, the project is consistent with the standards of the R -8 zone. This is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Goals, 1, 3, 6 and 7, and Policies 6.5 and 6,6. The introduction to the General Plan identifies Leucadia as containing "many custom homes and possesses a rustic informal charm. The individuality of the structures is an element of the area's character that should be maintained and encouraged." Leucadia's unique identity is a mixture of various types of development that was constructed over a period of time, i.e., apartments, condominiums, trailer park, duplexes, single family attached and detached at a variety of densities and styles. This project brings key elements found in the Leucadia community, as described above, and implements them within the parameters of the R -8 Zone. North 101 Corridor Specific Plan: Much of the standards for the 101 Specific Plan relate to residential development on 101 Highway and do not apply to this site. The surrounding community has a variety of design, materials, and building massing. The project has taken some of the design elements of the community and incorporated it into its design. Balconies, dormers, gables, hip roofs and other design elements are incorporated into the design to create variety in style and shape. The building materials are durable. All garages are attached to the structure and part of the integral design. No psrrm/cdd/ghcso /pc200063 Ur dr final. doc 4 i Iw:. CC. atwiti C.D-rii "MLTDIVIYL MU11LD NJ. d,r Y.fi17 exposed mechanical equipment is proposed. (Section 4.6.1 Architectural Considerations, North 101 Corridor Specific Plan) The homes within the project are 19' in height to 25'- 6" in height (one and two stories). These heights are consistent with the surrounding residential neighborhood. (Section 4.6.2, North 101 Corridor Specific Plan) Zoning Code: The design of the homes and siting meet or exceed the Zoning Standards. Section 30.16.010C identifies additional standards for R -8 zoned property. The subdivision is designed as one subdivision having 46 units. Six homes have direct access to Sanford Street. This overall design helps to split the project up into smaller areas consistent with the community, The project utilizes a more uniform rectangular lot design; however, this is broken up with three private stub streets. The project proposes sidewalks along Sanford Street, Vulcan Avenue and Street B. The project takes advantage of the reduced front yard setback to vary the streetscape. 14 lots have less than 25' required front yard setback. Where practical the driveways do not exceed 50% of the front yard. Three lots (25, 28, and 34) appear to exceed this standard; however, this is acceptable, These three lots are located in cul -de -sacs , and generally have smaller /narrower front yards. Design Review /Design and Site Layout Provisions: The project is consistent with the design and site layout provisions of the Design Review requirements. The site is relatively flat with a westerly slope toward Vulcan Avenue. Minimal grading is proposed. The highest graded slope is approximately 14' (between lots 25 and 6 & 7). The project grading reflects the existing topography of the site. The project has been sensitive to the edges of the subdivision adjacent to existing residential uses. A torrey pine is adjacent to the site in the northeast area. No grading is occurring around the tree offsite. An arborist will be onsite during grading operations within this area to insure its survival. An existing slope exists at the northeast portion of the site and will remain, eliminating the need for a retaining wall. A 4' high retaining wall is located on the north boundary from lots 36 to 39. Instead of placing a 5' fence on the top of the retaining wall, the applicant has located the fence back away from the retaining wall to allow for landscaping. A retaining wall (8' maximum) is near the east boundary of the project. This does not impact the adjacent properties, since they are above the project site. Retaining walls are proposed in other areas of the site ranging from 5.5' to less than 1' in height. The retaining walls are in rear and side yards and will be keystone, crib or other similar design. No public views have been identified to or across the site. Private views from the east have been identified. Based on a view analysis, no significant view impacts will occur. The project has been revised to take access to Sanford Street closer to Vulcan Avenue. The traffic on Hygeia should be less than originally anticipated in the traffic study. The traffic study concluded that there are no significant impacts associated with this project on adjacent streets. NUV. LG. eWOU e:54Flm bKLTS I UnL HUMLb IYU. d(� Building Design Provisions, The project is consistent with building design provisions of the Design Review Regulations. The project utilizes a variety of designs, massing, materials and color to create a wide range of design. A variety in building massing and design is provided with; single story homes (14 single story homes are spread throughout the project), variety of rooflines and pitches; variety of roof styles (hip, dormers, shed, gables, etc); 5 different floor plans, each with 4 different elevations; single story elements on two story structures; porches; balconies; and options, such as, room extensions and porch wrap - arounds to create.a more custom look. Materials used include; composition shingle, flat concrete tile, variety of column styles along the front porches, shingle siding, stucco, brick, horizontal lap siding, vertical wood trim, roll -up wood garage doors, and special window treatment (shaped wood trim, wood pot shelves, shed roofs, wood shutters, varying shapes, built -up wood trim, etc). Elements of the community were taken into consideration with the design of the homes. The project building designs are significantly different utilizing a variety of materials, design and massing. These are functionally compatible with and similar in scale with the adjacent properties (trailer park, single - family homes, duplexes, .condominiums and apartments), which have a variety of materials and massing/design. A 2.5 -acre park is proposed at the corner of Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street, which would be accessible to the community. The project is not anticipated to impact the adjacent properties with noise. Lighting may have impacts and, as such, streetlights have been eliminated to preserve the dark sky character of the community. Landscape Design Provisions; The project is consistent with the landscape design provisions. The project proposes 24" to 48" box trees along the various streets. Smaller trees (5 gallon) are proposed on interior slopes and 15 gallon on perimeter slopes. Landscaping along Sanford and a portion of Street "B" (Lots 13 -16) will be enhanced and informal. This landscaping will be installed by the applicant. The applicant will provide concrete work and trees for the interior lots. An allowance will be provided for any additional front yard landscape improvements on the interior lots, This will help with achieving an individual/informal design throughout the project. Privacy and Securiry Provisions: The project design is consistent with the Privacy and Security Provisions. Based on the edge treatments discussed above, the project does not intrude on the privacy of the neighboring properties. The proposed single family homes will be compatible with the adjacent homes. No unsafe areas have been identified. All fire safety regulations will be met. Conclusion: The project design is consistent with the General Plan, North 101 Corridor Specific Plan and Municipal Code. b. The project design is substantially inconsistent with the Design Review Guidelines. psmhddrpgn:rWpc200063 5r dr finsl.doc 6 1`IVV. CC. ciduu C•:Dr'I bMLI>Iuwc nui'ir IYV.0,c, r � I � I Facts/Discussiou: No public views have been identified to or across the site. Private views from the east have been identified. Based on a view analysis, no significant view impacts will occur. Building Design: The project is consistent with building design provisions of the Design Review Regulations. The project utilizes a variety of designs, massing, materials and color to create a wide range of design. A variety in building massing and design is provided with: single story homes (14 single story homes are spread throughout the project), variety of rooflines and pitches; variety of roof styles (hip, dormers, shed, gables, etc); 5 different floor plans, each with 4 different elevations; single story elements on two story structures; porches; balconies; and options, such as, room extensions and porch wrap - arounds to create a more custom look. Materials used include: composition shingle, flat concrete tile, variety of column styles along the front porches, shingle siding, stucco, brick, horizontal lap siding, vertical wood trim, roll -up wood garage doors, and special window treatment (shaped wood trim, wood pot shelves, shed roofs, wood shutters, varying shapes, built -up wood trim, etc). Elements of the community were taken into consideration with the design of the homes. The project building designs are significantly different utilizing a variety of materials, design and massing. These are functionally compatible with and similar in scale with the adjacent properties (trailer park, single - family homes, duplexes, condominiums and apartments), which have a variety of materials and massin&/design. A 2.5 -acre park is proposed at the corer of Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street, which would be accessible to the community. The project is not anticipated to impact the adjacent properties with noise. Lighting may have impacts and, as such, streetlights have been eliminated to preserve dark sky character of the community, Landscape Design Provisions: The project is consistent with the landscape design provisions. The project proposes 24" to 48" box trees along the various streets. Smaller trees (5 gallon) are proposed on interior slopes and 15 gallon on perimeter slopes. Landscaping along Sanford and a portion of Street "B" (Lots 13 -16) will be enhanced and informal, This landscaping will be installed by the applicant. The applicant will provide concrete work and trees for the interior lots. An allowance will be provided for any additional front yard landscape improvements on the interior lots. This will help with achieving an individual/informal design throughout the project. Privacy and Security: Based on the edge treatments discussed above, the project does not intrude on the privacy of the neighboring properties. The proposed single family homes will be compatible with the adjacent homes. No unsafe areas have been identified. All fire safety regulations will be met. Conclusion: The project is substantially consistentwith the Design Review Guidelines. I`1V'v. GG. C✓JU'J G•��rli VRLIJI V�L nvI ICJ ilV. � /.] r. 1Cl�1J C. The project would adversely affect the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Facts/Discussion: A site assessment was conducted for the property to determine any human health risk and potential groundwater contamination. The Final EIR concluded that any risks are below a level of significance with following mitigation measures: Should discolored soil indicative of a hydraulic oil released be encountered during grading activities in the vicinity of the former sampling, the soil shall be segregated and properly disposed of offsite. Project design, as conditioned provides for public road improvements. Many of the road improvements are modified to help address compatibility with the community character. Even with the modifications, the road improvements will improve existing safety conditions within the area. The existing sharp bend in Sanford Street will be realigned to meet City standards. Sidewalks will be provided to insure the safety of pedestrians. Conclusion: The project would not adversely affect the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. d. The project would cause the surrounding neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or value. Facts/Discussion: The surrounding community is generally characterized as single - family attached and detached units with duplexes, apartments and condominiums. Homes vary in size, style and age. The existing lots within the R8 zone, within 300' of the project average 13,240 square feet and have an average density of 7.3 dwelling units per gross acre. Many of the existing lots along Sanford Street, Hygeia Avenue, and Hillcrest Drive have two or more units located on them. Apartments with high density are also located at the north end of Hermes Avenue within the 300' radius of the project. The project site is zoned R -8 (maximum 8 units per acre) similar to much of the property adjacent to the site. The project proposes single - family homes at a density of 4.5 units per acre. The project is below the allowed density and is below the density of the surrounding area. In addition, the surrounding area in the R -8 Zone could experience future lot- splits and new larger single - family homes. The project design simulates some of the characteristics of the neighborhood, i.e., three private dead -end roads, and lots fronting on Sanford Street, varied front yard setbacks, single story and two story units, varying rooflines, etc. No public views have been identified to or across the site. Private views from the east have been identified. Based on a view analysis, no significant view impacts are anticipated. Conclusion: The project would not cause the surrounding neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or value. psm/cdd/r1mso /pc200063 grdr find.doc 9 I I I NUV.cc.CUU0 C; D7rm VKtnDIUNL "UML5 NU. bey P. 11/11i ATTACHMENT "B" Resolution No. PC2000 -63 Case No. Case 098 -240 DR Greystone Project Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street Case #98 -240 DR SCI SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: SC3 Approval of the Design Review Permit will expire on October 5, 2002, at 5:00 pm, two years after the approval of this project, unless the conditions have been met or an extension of time has been approved pursuant to the Municipal Code, SCS The Design Review Permit is conditionally approved as set forth on the application and project drawings, including: Design Review Site Plan titled "Site Plan `Bay Laurel "' consisting of 1 sheet, dated received by the City of Encinitas on October 5, 2000; Floor Plans and Elevations titled "Bay Laurel at Leucadia" consisting of 41 sheets, dated received by the City of Encinitas on October 2, 2000; the Landscape Plan titled "Preliminary Landscape Plan Bay Laurel" consisting of 5 sheets, dated received by the City of Encinitas on October 5, 2000; and material boards consisting of 15 boards, dated received by the City of Encinitas on October 5, 2000, and shall not be altered without express authorization by the Community Development Department. Community Development Department SCA The conditions of the Tentative Map Resolution No. PC 2000 -62 shall continue to apply. SCB Authorization to exceed the building height envelope has not been approved, All building heights are under 26'. Extensions above the 26' for chimneys as depicted on the floor plans and building elevations have been approved. SCC An Administrative Coastal Development Permit shall be submitted and approved by the Community Development Department for any temporary construction/sales office trailer or temporary parking for the models homes for the site. Design Review (Architectural and Site Design) SCD The floor plan types (Plans 1 -5, including Plan 4A) shall be sited on the individual residential lots as depicted on the approved Design Review Site Plan and as modified below. The location of the Floor Plans, Architectural Elevations and Color Schemes shall not be revised without the review and approval of the Cornmuraty Development Department, subject to the following provisions: Except as approved on the approved Design Review ps9Rdd/g/mso /pc200063 Sr dr final.doc 9 IVVV. CC. COLAIJ C. bMLJDIVIYL nUI'IL_ nV. U!J r. 1c, 17 Site Plan, the floor plan shall not be repeated on either side of a home nor directly across the street; and the architectural facade approved for each floor plan shall not be repeated widen three (3) houses on either side of a home nor directly across the street; and the individual color scheme (or similar color schemes) shall not be repeated on either side of a home nor directly across the street; _ "Directly across the street," for purposes herein, shall be defined so that in the event that the subject home's property lot lines, when extended across the street, encompass more than one lot, then the architectural facade and/or color limitations would apply to all lots so encompassed. "Similar color schemes," for purposes herein, shall be determined by the Planning Commission Subcotrurnittee, The floor plan, elevation and color scheme type chosen to be utilized for each individual home shall be referenced on the respective home's building permit application. The floor plan, elevation, and color scheme type shall conform with the approved plan siting and/or criteria noted above, Any changes proposed to the floor plan, elevation, or color scheme type subsequent to building permit issuance shall also be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department, subject to the provisions identified above. Should the proposed revisions not comply with the above provisions, the proposed changes may be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission Subcommittee. The Planning Commission Subcommittee may determine that the changes are significant and require Plarur ng Commission approval at a public hearing. Approved changes shall be revised accordingly on the approved building permit plans. SCE The Enhanced Elevations shall be modified prior to issuance of building permits as identified below: 1 Plan 1 — The Enhanced Elevation shall be wrapped around to the 15` inside corner of the rear elevation. (Example: Lou 5, 13, 17, and 24) 2 Plan 3 — The Enhanced Elevation shall wrap around to the rear elevation ending at the chimney pop out. (Example: Lots 10 and 16) 3 Lot 29 — The Enhanced Elevation shall be provided on the south side elevation and wrapped around to the rear elevation ending at the chimney pop out. 4 Lot 33 — The Enhanced Elevation shall be provided on the north side elevation and wrapped around to the inside comer on the rear elevation. SCF The building elevations shall be modified prior to the issuance of building permits as identified below: 1 Chimney caps to vary in design. 2 Identify the size of the trim around the doors and windows. 3 Describe the shutters, i.e., material thickness, trim size, panels, etc. 4 Identify the size of posts, pickets and top rail needed for the front porch railings. 5 Identify the sizes for pot shelves, window boxes, and corbels. 6. Houses with shingle siding shall not use a composition shingle roof material. 1YVW.CC. GYJrIrJ C ; ^Dr'I'I Ua,LT51QNL MUML5 7 L E ills: Nu.JrJ Y. ldi17 — Single story homes shall be lowered to not exceed 19' to finished ridgeline. The roof pitch on all of the single story homes shall be modified to 4.5;12 pitch. Roof overhangs shall increase a minimum of 6" on bungalow style homes (Plans 3 and 4) and on other plans where it does not impact the-&e-sign of the home and when it does not conflict with Zoning Code limitations for encroachments into 5' side yard setbacks. The building elevation designs for Plan 4A (accessory unit) shall vary consistent with the 4 different elevation designs approved for Plan 4 and shall be spread throughout the subdivision. The following modifications to the Floor Plans and Elevations have been approved by the Planning Commission and shall be incorporated into the plan check submittal for building permit issuance: a. Pages I and 8 — correct the specific reference to the side yard dimensions. Side yard setback vanes depending on location on lot. b. Pages 4, 5, 6 and 7. Elevations IA, 113, 1C and 1D — add window with shutters into garage. C. Pages 4, 5 and 6, Elevations IA, 1B, and 1C — clarify that the enhanced elevation continues to the inside corner of the rear elevations. d. Page 4, Elevation IA — add shingle siding to the full retreat pop out (3 sides) on the rear elevation. e. Page 5, Elevation 1B — add horizontal lap siding to the full retreat pop out (3 sides) on the rear elevation. f Page 6, Elevation 1C — add brick veneer wainscot to the full retreat pop out (3 sides) on the rear elevation. g. Page 11, Elevation 2C — add horizontal lap siding to all 3 sides of the second floor bath pop out on the rear and side elevations h. Page 12, Elevation 2D — add horizontal lap siding to all 3 sides of the second floor bath pop out on the rear and side elevations consistent with the other elevations. i. Page 13, Elevation 2E — add shingle siding to all 3 sides of the second floor bath pop out on the rear and side elevations. j. Page 15, Plan 3 — widen the base of the chimney pop out and dimension the pop out. k. Pages 18 -21, Elevations 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D — widen the base of the chimney pop out on the rear elevation and dimension the pop out., 1. Page 18, Elevation 3A — add shingle siding to all 3 sides of the full "nook" pop out; on the left side elevation, the shingle siding and the eave overhang immediately above the "nook" shall extend 12', In addition, shutters shall be added to the garage window on the left side elevation. M. Page 19, Elevation 3B — add shingle siding to all 3 sides of the full "nook" POP out; on the left side elevation, the shingle siding and the eave overhang immediately above the "nook" shall extend 12', In addition, shutters shall be added to the garage window on the left side elevation. n. Page 20, Elevation 3C — add horizontal lap siding to all 3 sides of the full "nook" pop out; on the left side elevation, the horizontal lap siding and the cave overhang immediately above the "nook" shall extend 12'. In pslvcd&g /rcso/pc200063 sr dr Mal.doc i I.aa.G✓MWj c•_irli o' I > I V' 1L .'�. u I: r. ir, i� addition, shutters shall be added to the garage window on the left side elevation, o. Page 21, Elevation 3D — add shutters to the garage window on left side elevation, p. Page 25, Elevation 4A — add shingle siding at the family room/master suite portion of the rear elevation (1" and 2nd floors) and wrap shingle siding around to the right side elevation for a distance of 9'. q. Page 27, Elevation 4D — add horizontal lap siding at the family room/master suite portion of the rear elevation (I" and 2 "d floors) and wrap horizontal lap siding around to the right side elevation for a distance of 9'. r. Page 28, Elevation 4E — add shingle siding at the family room master suite Portion of the rear elevation (I" and 2 "d floors) and wrap shingle siding around to the right side elevation for a distance of 9'. S. Pages 29 and 30, Plan 4A — revisions noted for Plan 4 shall apply to Plan 4A. t. Page 34, Elevation 5C — provide some type of siding /treatment (other than brick veneer) to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department on the two comers of the kitchen/nook pop out located on the rear elevation (1" floor), as follows: left corner — starting from the left edge of kitchen window and extend around comer to inside comer of family room; and right corner — starting from the right edge of the french doors extend around corner to left edge of window on the left side elevation. U. Page 35, Elevation 5D — elevation shall be corrected to reflect a hip roof over the I" floor kitchen/nook pop out. V. Page 36, Elevation 5E — add shingle siding to the kitchen/nook pop out on the rear elevation and wrap around left corner to end at the inside corner of the family room and wrap around right comer to left side elevation to end at the left edge of the window. W. Page 37, Elevation 5F.— add horizontal lap siding to the kitchert/nook pop out on the rear elevation and wrap around left corner to end at the inside comer of the family room and wrap around right corner to left side elevation to end at the left edge of the window. SCG The concrete roof tiles on the proposed houses shall be an integral color so that the interior color of the tiles will approximately match the finish surface colors of the roof riles. SCH Window muntins to be expressed on the exterior of the window glass. SCI The following types of Hardiboard/Hardiplank for exterior siding have been approved: Hardiplank Select Colonial Smooth Lap Siding, Hardiplank Select Colonial Roughsawn Lap Siding, Hardiplank Select Beaded Cedarrnill Lap Siding, Hardie Shingleside, Hardiplank Select Cedarmill Lap Siding, and Hardiplank Select Smooth Lap Siding. SCI To help provide greater diversity, the roof materials shall vary within each elevation style. Example: Lot 1 is plotted with a 1B plan/elevation using a composition shingle NUV. ee. C-WUVJ C; 7rrM k�FLT51UNL MUML'.b NU.Ur: H. 15V17 roof material. Lot 17 is also plotted with a 1B plan/elevation, however, a concrete roof material would be allowed. However, homes with shingle siding shall not use a composition shingle roof material, The Design Review Site Plan dated October 5, 2000, does not reflect this. The Material/Color schedule shall be modified prior to issuance of building permits. SCK Celotex "Presidential TL" Tri- Laminate Shake Shingles (or approved equal) shall be used for the composition shingles roof material. SCL The "Summit Door" brand for painted wood garage doors has been approved. SCM All trim around the doors /windows shall match the design style of the home and used throughout the exterior of the home. Example: If wood trim is used in the front elevation, wood trim shall be used on the side and rear elevations even if these walls are stucco. Circulation SCN The rolled curbs and sidewalks shall be textured and colored (earth tone — possibly muted adobe color) to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. At a minimum the sidewalk and tolled curb shall have a heavy broom finish texture; applicant to provide as much interest as possible. Applicant to provide a 4'x4' sample of the color and texture of the sidewalk for Community Development Department approval prior to installation. The sidewalk shall meander and range in distance from the rolled curb from 2.5' to 5' to adequately allow for landscaping between the rolled curb and sidewalk. At the driveway, the sidewalk may be adjacent to the rolled curb. SCO Planning Commission opposes posting no parking signs or red curbs on Sanford Street. SCP A minimum of three types of driveway designs shall be used throughout the subdivision in a random fashion. The color of driveways to match the sidewalk. SCQ The driveways shall be necked down, where possible. Grading SCR The pad elevations approved through the Design Review Permit shall establish the grade to measure building height, as identified on the Design Review Site Plan. Building height measurement shall be from the finished exterior grade (as established by the Design Review Site Plan) to the highest point of the finished roof immediately above. Landscaping SCS A final landscape plan shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit and incorporate the conditions relating to landscaping and fencing. psrNcdd/g/reso /pc200063 gr dr find.doc 13 NUV.CC.CVJJJ C. D, YI'1 lr.Lr>i V�YL nViYL_ SCT The final landscape plan shall be modified as follows: lu. J/ t. n. 10/1'J 1. The following trees shall be deleted from the final landscape plan (Torrey Pine, Aleppo Pine, and London Plane) and shall be replaced with trees that do not exceed a height of 50'. 2. Add avocado tree to the landscape plan. 3. Replace grass turf in the parkway with low maintenance shrubs, 4. The amount of box trees shall be increased by 10% based on the number of box trees identified on the Preliminary Landscape Plan that are located along the streets and front yards (excluding the park trees). The additional box trees shall be placed on Sanford Street and north side of Lots 36 to 46. 5. Linear placement of trees shall be avoided. 6. Shrubs shall have the same intensity /variety as the trees. SCU Street trees and front yard trees (planted by the applicant) shall vary in size, type and location/grouping as identified on the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and as modified by these conditions. A minimum of 5 different species of trees shall be used for street and front yard trees. Trees located within the rear of the homes shall be 5 and 15 gallon, depending on the screening required. Applicant shall install the street trees and front yard landscaping along Sanford Street. In all other areas, the applicant will install the street trees and trees in the yards as identified on the landscape plan and provide the homeowner with an allowance to landscape the front yard. All front yards shall be landscaped within 6 months from purchase. SCV Landscaping (particularly trees) around the edge of the subdivision shall be installed first, to the extent possible. This would include: Sanford Street, eastern slope and north boundary. The trees along the north boundary shall vary with 2 to 3 species to be informally designed for screening purposes. SCW Landscaping height shall be limited in height to not block views along the eastern slope. This shall be documented through recordation of a covenant. Preliminary Landscape Plan shall demonstrate that views will not be blocked when plant maturity is reached. To implement this condition, the Preliminary Landscape Plan proposes shrubs (no trees) within this area. SCX An arborist shall be on -site during the grading operations around the existing Torrey pine located on the north side (off -site) of the project. SCY Lot 46 — Trees shall be provided on Lot 46 in the front yard adjacent to the park and the driveway. This will help to soften the view of Street "B" from Vulcan Avenue. SCZ The park design (including related landscaping) is subject to a public review process through the Community Services Department. Approval of the park design and related landscaping is not pan of this Design Review Permit. NUV.ee.2UUW 2: �GHM IaKLTbIUNL HUMLb NU. br:; P. 17/1`j Fencing SCAA The fence along the east property boundary shall be a design that does not block the views of the easterly properties, i.e., 4' solid fence or 4' to 6' black tubular steel fence or combination (4' solid and 2' open), or retain existing walls /fences. SCBB Lot 46 -- The fencing on the west boundary of Lot 46 shall be subject to review through the park design process. The applicant shall be required to install the fence. SCCC Lot 5 — The south facing fence on Lot 5 shall end at the southeast corner of the home. SCDD A solid wood fence may be installed (similar to option A of the Fence Plan) between the homes (side and rear yards), Where the fence is visible from the street (typically front and some side yards) Options B and C fence style shall be utilized. The style of the fencing visible from the street (Options B and C) shall be mixed throughout the subdivision and be consistent with the architecture of the home. The color of the fencing shall vary and be consistent with the home. The location of the type of fencing and material description shall be subject to the review and approval' of the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits, SCEE The fence plan shall be modified to reflect the fence location on the approved building elevations, unless specifically modified by these conditions. SCFF Steps in the masonry wall shall reflect a consistentpattem. Signage: SCGG The monument pilasters identified on the Preliminary Landscape Plan shall be permitted on a temporary basis, and shall be removed at the time the sales office is removed for the project. No permanent monument signage (or wall) is permitted, Design Review SC14H Minimum of 14 homes shall be single story and shall be located as depicted on the Design Review Site Plan. The single story homes shall be deed restricted to single story and the proposed height, as modified through the Design Review Permit process. (See Condition SCF7) SCII The retaining walls shall be of decorative block including, but not limited to, slumpstone, split face block, or precision block with stucco. SCJJ A covenant shall be recorded on a portion of Lots 11, 12 and 13 limiting the height of the landscaping to 3' feet to insure adequate sight distance as determined by the Engineering Department. psm/cdd/6/msolpc20W 63 Sr dr f nal.doc is 01 NUV.ee.edUU c :ytirm lahGTS UNL HUML5 fYU. 0(.:; F'. 1C /ly SCKK Applicant shall coordinate with the Post Office for mail delivery. Adjustments to the street improvements may be necessary to accommodate the number of boxes in one location. Any changes to the street improvements shall be to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services and Community Development Departments. STANDARD CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): G2 This approval may be appealed to the City Council within I5 calendar days from the date of this approval in accordance with Chapter 1,12 of the Municipal Code. G4 Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall cause a covenant regarding real property to be recorded. Said covenant shall set forth the terms and conditions of this grant of approval and shall be of a form and content satisfactory to the Community Development Director. G5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Municipal Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived herein. G7 Prior to issuing a final inspection on framing, the applicant shall provide a survey from a licensed surveyor or a registered civil engineer verifying that the building height of all two - story homes is in compliance with the approved plans for all the two story homes. The measuring of the building height shall be from the approved graded pads. GI O All retaining and other freestanding walls, fences, and enclosures shall be architecturally designed in a manner similar to, and consistent with, the primary structures (e.g. stucco - coated masonry, split -face block or slump stone). These items shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building and/or grading permits. G12 Prior to any use of the project site pursuant to this permit, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed or secured to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department, B1 BUILDING CONDITION(S) CONTACT THE ENCINITAS BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): B2R The applicant shall submit a complete set of construction plans to the Building Division for plancheck processing. The submittal shall include a Soils /Geotechnical Report, structural calculations, and State Energy compliance documentation (Title 24). Construction plans IIVV. CC. CUUU a. Z6rl'I bKLTbWIIL "Ul'ILS NU.U'Ld F.17i17 shall include a site plan, a foundation plan, floor and roof framing plans, floor plan(s), section details, exterior elevations, and materials specifications-. Submitted plans must show compliance with the latest adopted editions of the California Building.Code (The Uniform Building Code with California Amendments, the California Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Codes). These comments are preliminary only. A comprehensive plancheck will be completed prior to permit issuance and additional technical code requirements may be identified and changes to the originally submitted plans may be required. ptnJcdd/ghno/pc2000 63 gr dr Anal. doc 17 RESOLUTION NO.2000 -6I DEC 1 1 20M ENGINE U, SEMVICEC I_ CI_T Or FN _Y Of �_vli A$ � A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A 46 LOT SUBDIVISION, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF VULCAN AVENUE AND SANFORD STREET (CASE NO. 98-240 TM/CDP/EIR; APN: 254 -052 -12 & 13,254-101-7 & 24,254-102-51) WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Tentative Map, Design Review Permit, and Coastal Development permit was filed by Greystone Homes to allow a 46 lot subdivision and 2.5 acre neighborhood park, in accordance with Section 66474 of the California Government Code, and Sections 23.08.072 and 30.80.090 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, for the property located in the R -8 Zone and Residential 8 Land Use Designation, legally described as: That portion of Lot 7 in Block 21 of North Leucadia, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 524, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, April 6, 1888, and as completely described in the Grant Deed dated August 27, 1999, Document #90466177. (Perry) All of Lots 7 to 10 inclusive and portion of Lots 6 and 11 in Block 27, together with a portion of Sanford Street and Juno Avenue, and also a portion of the alley in said Block 27, as said Street, Avenue and Alley were vacated and closed to public use on November 19, 1915, by Order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego, a certified copy of which said order was recorded December 26, 1916 in Book 500, page 343 of Deeds, in the Office of the Recorder of said San Diego County, all being in North Leucadia, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Map thereofNo 524, filed in the Office of the Recorder of said San Diego County, April 6, 1888, and as completely described in the Grant Deed dated July 9, 1969, Document 911523 1. (Hall) All of Lots 2 to 15 inclusive and a portion of Lots I and 16 in Block 27, together with a portion of Sanford Street and Juno Avenue, and also a portion of the alley in said Block 27, as said Street, Avenue and Alley were vacated and closed to the public use in November 19, 1915, by order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego, a certified copy of which said order was recorded December 26, 1916, in Book 500, page 343 of Deeds, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County; all being in North Leucadia, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Maps thereof No. 524, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on April 6, 1888, and as completely described in the Grant Deed dated September 21, 1964, Document # 191847 [z WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing on the application on June 15, 2000, at which time all those desiring to be heard were heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved the Tentative Map and Coastal Development Permit and continued the Design Review Permit on June 29,2000; and WHEREAS, two appeals were filed of the Planning Commission's approval of the Tentative Map and Coastal Development permit on July 10, 2000; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a noticed public hearing of the two appeals of the Planning Commission's approval of the Tentative Map and Coastal Development Permit on August 16, 2000, at which time all those desiring to be heard were heard, and appointed a Subcommittee to meet with the applicant and neighbors; and WHEREAS, the City Council met on September 13, 2000, at a continued hearing to receive an oral report by the Council Subcommittee; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered, without limitation: 1. The two appeals filed by Mike Lafferty and CPC (Community Park Council) both dated July 10, 2000; 2. The August 16, 2000, City Council agenda report with attachments; 3, The June 15, 2000, and June 29, 2000, Planning Commission agenda reports with attachments; q The Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2000 -41 approving the Tentative Map and Coastal Development Permit, and Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2000 -40 certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report; 5. The General Plan, Local Coastal program, North 101 Corridor Specific Plan, Municipal Code, and associated Land Use Maps; 6. Oral evidence submitted at the hearing; 7. Written evidence submitted at the hearing; The tentative map and application dated received by the City on June 7, 2000, consisting of 2 sheets; 9. Final Environmental Impact Report; and 10. Revised lot layout for the subdivision dated received by the City on September 12, 2000. Ar WHEREAS, the City Council made the following findings pursuant to Section 66474 of the California Government Code (Tentative Map), and 30.80.090 (Coastal Development Permit) of the Encinitas Municipal Code: (SEE ATTACHMENT "A ") NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Encinitas hereby denies the appeal and approves application Case #98 -240 TM/CDP/EIR for the Tentative Map and Coastal Development Permit as revised (46 single family lots and 2.5 acre park) and subject to the following conditions: (SEE ATTACHMENT "B ") BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council, in its independent judgment, finds the revised project to be consistent with the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Prepared for the project, since the number of single - family lots has been reduced to 46 with a 2.5 acre park while maintaining the basic subdivision design previously analyzed by the Final EIR (the Final EIR analyzed a 50 lot project with a 2 acre park as the proposed project); the Final EIR was certified as complete by the City Council on September 13, 2000. i PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13'x' day of September 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DuVivier, Guerin, Holz NAYS: Cameron ABS0gT: None ABSTAIN: Bond Ciek Mayor Chuck DuVivier City of Encinitas City Council ATTEST: Deborah Cervone, City Clerk IM t ATTACHMENT "A" Resolution No. 2000 -62 Case No. 98 -240 TM/CDP/EIR FINDINGS FOR A TENTATIVE MAP STANDARD: Section 66474 of the California Government Code requires that the authorized agency approve an application for a Tentative Map unless, based upon the information Presented in the application and during the Public Hearing, the authorized agency makes any of the following findings of fact: a That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451 of the Subdivision Map Act. Facts/Discussion, The revised map consists of lo fro single amity omen to density of 4.5 units per acre. The lots rang approximately 10,000 square feet The site is relatively level with topography sloping from the east to the west Access is off of Sanford Street close to Vulcan Avenue. The subdivision has one internal public street and three short private streets. The project also includes the provision of a 2.5 -acre lot for park purposes. The subdivision provides for collecting and conveying the project area drainage through the natural biofilter and grass depression for cleansing and detention purposes. Road improvements have been reduced to minimize the impact to community character, however, improvements still meet safety standards. The streetlights have been eliminated to preserve the dark sky. The Land Use Designation for the site is Residential 8 (8 units per acre). The project is below the planned density and exceeds the minimum lot size of 5,400 square feet- While the proposed 46 homes would require police, fire and school services, they would not cause the need for new facilities to be constructed. The project design includes the provision of a 2.5 -acre park that would serve the project and existing community. Road improvements will be required within and immediately adjacent to the project As identified by the Traffic Analysis, adequate vehicular access is available to the site. As such, the proposed project would not significantly affect public services or access nor exceed the City's ability to provide a desirable level of facilities and services. This portion of Leucadia is lacking any neighborhood park that is available to the entire community. The General Plan identifies a standard of 3 -5 acres for a neighborhood park. The park is accessible by those living in the immediate neighborhood. This is consistent with the Recreation Element goals for providing neighborhood parks within the community, and the North 101 Corridor Specific Plan Goal 2.2.5. / The project is required to collect on -site drainage and convey the flows under Vulcan Avenue to the east side. Flows would then move north ultimately to Batiguitos Lagoon in an open unlined channel. In addition, the project is required to install a natural biofilter which will include a grass swale and grass depression in the park for water cleansing and detention purposes. (Specific Plan Goal 2.2.4A, Land Use Policy 2.8, Resource Management Element Goals 1 and 2 and Policies 2.1 and 2.3) It is recognized that a subdivision has difficulty matching the existing character of a community; however, project changes have occurred that increase its compatibility with the community. These changes include: modification to road and streetlight standards, three stub streets, relocation of Street B to access Sanford Street closer to Vulcan Avenue, reduction in the number of residential low lowerfretai 50 walls and improved project edge treatments with lower grading and increased landscaping. The subdivision provides for a neighborhood park and a street design that reflects elements of Leucadia, i.e., stub (dead-end) tree results ors are typically smaller than the surrounding community, which also setbacks, lot coverage and floor area ratios that are different from the surrounding community; however, the project is consistent with the standards of the R -8 zone. (I.,U Goal 4, 6 and 7, Circulation Element Goal 2 and related policies) The property is relatively flat and rectangular. One cul-de -sac is proposed for FF internal access with 2 stub streets that access this internal road. One stub street takes access off of Sanford Street The overall road/subdivision design reflects the Leucadia community with dead -end streets. (Circulation Element Goal 1 and related policies) Consistent with the City's affordable housing requirements, the project will be required to provide 4 accessory units. These units are constructed within the single- family units. (Housing Element, Goal 1 and Goal 2.2.2 of the North 101 Corridor Specific Plan). Based on the traffic analysis, the project does not substantially increase the existing traffic loads and capacities of the existing street system that would result in LOS E at builtout conditions. The majority of street segments and intersections operate at LOS C or better, and in some cases at LOS D (one tuming movement for the intersection of La Costa and Vulcan Avenue, ject and add a ion of Leucadia Boulevard between Orpheus and Vulcan). eject at LOS F during peak to the 1 -5 freeway which is already operating periods. This increase is considered to be a de minimus contribution to I -5. This is consistent with Goals 1 and 2 of the Circulation Element for a safe and convenient street system. The project does minimize the number of driveway access points onto local public roads. Most of the lots take access internally. Six homes take direct a474 cess onto k Sanford Street. The project does propose to eliminate the sharp bend in Sanford Street for safety purposes. A site assessment was conducted for the property to determine any human health risk and potential groundwater contamination. The Final EIR concluded that any risks are below a level of significance with following mitigation measures, consistent with Public Safety Element Goal 3. The offsite torrey pine shall be preserved. An onsite arborist is required during grading operations within the area to insure no impacts occur, consistent with Goal 3 of the Resource Management Element. Conclusion: The proposed map, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and North 101 Corridor Specific Plan- b. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Facts/Discussion: The property is relatively flat and rectangular. One cul-de -sac is proposed for internal access with 2 stub streets that access this internal road. One stub street takes access off of Sanford Street The overall road/subdivision design reflects the Leucadia community with dead-end streets. (Circulation Element Goal l and related policies) The road improvements are proposed to be modified to be consistent with the character of the community. Paved widths of roads have been reduced. Rolled curb that is textured and has an earth-tone color is required. Sidewalks are located only on one side of the road and are to be textured and colored (earth tone). Access to the project is via Vulcan Avenue and Hygeia Avenue. The traffic study has identified no significant impacts with this circulation pattern. All. necessary right -of -way will be required as a condition of the tentative map. The road designs and subdivision designs are consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan, Circulation Element Goal 2 and related policies. The North 101 Corridor Specific Plan identifies a special road standard and right -of -way for Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street. The Project's consistent with this standard. Streetlights for the project have been eliminated to preserve dark sky character of the neighborhood. Overhead utilities will be underground pursuant to the City standards. (Circulation Element Goal 2 and policies 4.10, 4.11, 4.12.) The project is required to collect on -site drainage and convey the flows under Vulcan Avenue to the east side. Flows would then move north ultimately to Batiguitos Lagoon. In addition, the project is required to install a natural biofrlter which will include a grass swale and grass depression in the park for water cleansing and detention purposes. (Specific Plan Goal 2.2.4A, Land Use Policy 2.8, Resource Management Element Goals 1 and 2 and Policies 2.1 and 2.3.) The project would drain into the Leucadia Drainage System project The system is divided primarily into two sections — south of Leucadia Boulevard and north of Leucadiaevard. The Greystone Homes project drains directly into the north system. The northerly system will consist of an earthen channel that will flow northerly and parallel to the tracks, on the west side of Vulcan Avenue, until it daylights into the existing swale. This channel provides positive drainage along the railroad right -of -way. The Greystone Homes project will be required to convey their drainage under Vulcan Avenue to the drainage system and will not appreciably contribute to any existing ponding. This also includes drainage along the north side of Sanford Street. The lots range in size from approximately 5,800 to 10,000 square feet consistent with the Residential 8 Standard of 5,400 square foot minimum. The project does propose to eliminate the sharp bend in Sanford Street for safety purposes. The property is relatively flat and rectangular. One cul-de -sac is proposed for internal access with 2 stub streets that access this internal road. One stub street takes access off of Sanford Street The overall road/subdivision design reflects the Leucadia community with dead-end streets Conclusion: The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. C. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development i Facts/Discussion: The site has a Land Use designation of Residential 8 (8 units per i acre). The site is relatively level with topography sloping from the east to the west The property is adjacent to Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street The project takes access off of Sanford Street. The revised project proposes 46 single -family homes and a 2.5 -acre park. Graded slopes are minimal and access to the site is good. The site was previously used for agricultural purposes. A site assessment was conducted for the property to determine any human health risk and potential groundwater contamination. The Final EIR concluded that any risks are below a level of significance with following mitigation measures: Should discolored soil indicative of a hydraulic oil released be encountered during grading activities in the vicinity of the former sampling, the soil shall be segregated and properly disposed of offshe Conclusion: The site is physically suitable for the type of development d That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Facts/Discussion: The proposed project is an infill development The site is 12 acres, relatively level and has immediate access to Sanford Street. The subdivision proposes one public internal street and 3 private stub streets. The project density is at 4.5 units per acre, under the maximum density allowed for the site. Lots range in size from approximately 5,800 to 10,000, and average 7,100. The subject site has a Land Use designation of Residential 8 (8 units per acre). While the proposed 46 homes would require police, fire and school services, they would not cause the need for new facilities to be constructed. The revised project design includes the provision of a 2.5 -acre park that would serve the project and existing community. Road improvements will be required within and immediately adjacent to the project. As identified by the Traffic Analysis, adequate vehicular access is available to the site. As such, the proposed project ccess nor exceed the City's would not significantly affect public services or a ability to provide a desirable level of facilities and services. The project is required to collect on -site drainage and convey the flows under Vulcan Avenue to the east side. Flows would then move north ultimately to Batiguitos Lagoon. In addition, the project is required to install a natural biofilter which will include a grass swale. and grass depression in the park for water cleansing and detention purposes. Based on the traffic analysis, the project does not substantially increase the existing traffic loads and capacities of the existing street system that would result in LOS E at builtout conditions. The majority of street segments and intersections operate at LOS C or better, and in some cases at LOS D (one turning movement for the intersection of La Costa and Vulcan ve u , is Boulevard between Orpheus and Vulcan). project will add a small amount of traffic to the I -5 Freeway which is already operating at LOS F during peak periods. This increase is considered to be a de minimus contribution to 1 -5. Conclusion: Based on the traffic study, existing road system, availability of services, the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of developmept. i e That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements avoidablre in trre tfish or substantial environmental damage or substantially Y j wildlife or their habitat Facts/Discussion: The project is required to collect on -site drainage and convey the flows under Vulcan Avenue to the li mV side, Flows would then ultimately to Batiguitos Lagoon. add on, the project is required to install a natural biofilter which will include a grass swale and Bass depression in the park for water cleansing and detention purpose. The project would drain into the Leucadia Drainage System project The system is divided primarily into two sections — south of Leucadia Boulevard and north of the north Leucadia Boulevard. The Greystone Homes project drains directly system. The northerly system will consist of an earthen channel that will flow northerly and parallel to the �eks�s channeltprovid s positive Avenue, rainage along daylights into the existing the railroad right -of -way. The Greystone Homes project will be required to convey their drainage under Vulcan Avenue to the drainage system and will not appreciably contribute to any existing ponding. This also includes drainage along the north side of Sanford Street. S/ No fish or wildlife or their habitat have been identified on the site and therefore no impacts are anticipated. Conclusion: The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or adversely injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. f That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems. Facts/Discussion: A site assessment was conducted for the property to determine any human health risk and potential groundwater contamination. The Final EIR concluded that any risks are below a level of significance with following mitigation measures: Should discolored soil indicative of a hydraulic oil released be encountered during grading activities in the vicinity of the former sampling, the soil shall be segregated and properly disposed of offsite. project design, as conditioned provides for public road improvements. Many of the road improvements are modified to help address compatibility with the community character. Even with the modifications, the road improvements bend in Sanford Street existing safety conditions within the area. The existing sharp will be realigned to meet City standards. Sidewalks will be provided to insure the i safety of pedestrians. Conclusion: The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with g' acquired b the public at large, for access through or use of, property easements ro Y P within the Proposed subdivision. In this connection, the authorized agency may approve a map if it finds that altemate easements, for access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Facts/Discussion: No easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through the property have been identified. The properties have been used for agricultural purposes and have been gated with no public access. Conclusion: The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. S2 FINDINGS FOR A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT STAB: Section 30.80.090 of the Municipal Code provides that the authorized agency must make the following findings of fact, based upon the information presented in the application and during the Public Hearing, in order to approve a coastal development permit: 1 The project is consistent with the certified Local Coastal Program of the City of Encinitas; and 2 The proposed development conforms with Public Resources Code Section 21000 and following (CEQA) in that there are no feasible mitigation measures or feasible alternatives available which would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact that the activity may have on the environment; and 3. For prujects involving development between the sea or other body of water and the nearest public road, approval shall include a specific finding that such development ection is in conformity 'nth the Public access and public recreation policies of S 30200 et seq. of the Coastal Act Facts/Discussion'- The revised map consists of 46 lots for single family homes at a density of 4.5 units per acre. The lots range in size from approximately mately from the 10,000 square feet.. The site is relatively level with topography sloping i east to the west. Access is off of Sanford Street close to Vulcan Avenue. The subdivision has one internal public street and three short private streets. The project also includes the provision of a 2.5 -acre lot for park purpo subdivision provides for collecting and conveying the project area drainage through the natural biofilter and grass depression for cleansing and detention purposes. Road improvements have rho ements still meet safety standards. community character, however, imp Streetlights have been eliminated to maintain the dark sky character of the community. The Land Use Designation for the site is Residential 8 (8 units per acre). The project is below the planned density and exceeds the minimum lot size of 5,400 square feet While the proposed 46 homes would require police, fire and school services, they would not cause the need for new facilities to be constructed. The project design includes the provision of a 2.5 -acre park that would serve the project and existing community. Road improvements will be required within and immediately adjacent to the project As identified by the Traffic Analysis, adequate vehicular access is available to the site. As such, the proposed project would not significantly affect public services or access nor exceed the City's ability to provide a desirable level of facilities and services nor impact coastal access. This portion of Leucadia is lacking any neighborhood park that is available to the entire community. The General Plan identifies a standard of 3 -5 acres for a neighborhood park. The park is accessible by those living in the immediate neighborhood. This is consistent with the Reacrreeattioe ]Elle�tmhe t 101 goals for Corridor Sped ng neighborhood parks within the community, Plan Goal 2.2.5. The project is required to collect on -site drainage and convey the flows under Vulcan Avenue to the east side. Flows would then move north ultimately to Batiguitos Lagoon in an open unlined channel. In addition, the project is required to the install a natural biofilter which will include a grass Sal an Plan Goal s depression Land park for water cleansing and detention purposes. (Pe Use Policy 2.8, Resource Management Element Goals 1 and 2 and Policies 2.1 and 2.3) Based on the traffic analysis, the project does not substantially increase the existing traffic loads and capacities of the existing street system that would result in LOS E at builtout conditions. The majority of street segments and intersections operate at LOS C or better, and in some cases at LOS D (one turning movement for the intersection of La Costa and Vulcan Avenue, and a portion of Leucadia Boulevard between Orpheus and Vulcan). The project will add a small amount of traffic to the I -5 freeway which is already operating at LOS F during peak periods. This increase is considered to be a de minimus contribution to I -5. As such, cow access will not be impacted. " e " A site assessment was conducted for the property to determine any human health risk and potential groundwater contamination. The Final EIR concluded that any risks are below a level of significance with following mitigation measures, consistent with Public Safety Element Goal 3. The offsite torrey pine shall be preserved. An onsite arborist is required during grading operations within the area to insure no impacts occur, consistent with Goal 3 of the Resource Management Element A Final Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the subject project No significant adverse impacts were identified that could not be mitigated_ A mitigation and monitoring report has been adopted resulting in all identified significant impacts to be reduced to a level below significance. 'Me project does not involve property between the sea or other body of water and the nearest public road. The project is located east of the 101 Highway Corridor. Conclusion: The project is consistent with the Certified Local Coastal Program. No significant impacts were identified that could not be mitigated, as such, no additional mitigation measures or alternatives that would substantially lessen any significant adverse impacts were needed. The project does not involve property between the sea or other body of water and the nearest public road. �g ATTACHMENT "B" Resolution No. 2000 -62 Case No. Case #98 -240 TM/CDP/E1R Greystone Protect Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street Case #98 -240 TM/CDP/EIR SC1 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: SO Approval of the Tentative Map and all associated pertnits will expire on September 13, 2003 at 5:00 pm, three years after the approval of this project, unless the conditions have been met or an extension of time has been approved pursuant to the Municipal Code. SC5 The revised tentative map and Coastal Development Permit are conditionally approved as set forth on the application and the subdivision lot layout dated received by the City of Encinitas on September 12, 2000, consisting of 1 sheet titled Bay Laurel Tentative Map (See Exhibit 2), all designated as approved by the City Council on September 13, 2000, and shall not be altered without express i authorization by the Community Development Department. This approval is based on the revised lot layout received by the City of Encinitas on September 12, 2000, (Exhibit 2). The revised lot layout is substantially consistent with the previously submitted map approved by the Planning Commission in relationship to lot size, lot location, drainage, and street layout. A revised tentative map shall be submitted to the Community Development Department by September 29, 2000, that reflects the revised lot layout (Exhibit 2) and that complies with City standards for tentative maps and zoning. Community Services Department SCA The applicant shall provide a 2.5 -acre park to the City upon approval and recordation of a Final Map for 46 residential units, subject to the following: I.Upon approval and recordation of the Final Map, the applicant will dedicate to the City .61 acres for park purposes, pursuant to Chapter 23.98 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, in -lieu of park dedication fees for the 46 -lot subdivision. The City may purchase 1.89 acres of the 2.5 acre park based on fair market value as determined in the appraisal dated February 10, 1999. In addition, Greystone shall pay park facilities fees of $283/du ($13,018). 15:r The applicant shall improve the park, dedicate the park upon completion of Wf- the facilities, and enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City to reimburse the applicalMor the cost of the improvements within one year from dedication. The park shall b ubstantially completed (i.e., all facilities constructed) prior to the first r -17rJ� Certificate of Occupancy being issued for the project, although the City may choose not to accept a par until the landscaping has been established and the park is t-0 MODWiS ready for use. Wqt te.r_:- G�� 2. The parkland will not be dedicated until the final map has been recorded. esign review approval for the park shall be completed prior to final map recordation. 3. The park location and configuration shall be as shown on the revised 46 lot tentative tract map along Vulcan Avenue and the western portion of Sanford Street. 4 The proposed park shall not contain any public rest rooms, on -site parking, nor be lighted for nighttime activity. 5. The proposed park will allow for a public utility easement (sewer, water, and storm drain) to cross it from the proposed Street B to Vulcan Avenue per the tentative map, as well as dry utility easements along the park frontage and any required on -site drainage facilities. There shall be direct public access to the park from Street B because the cul-de -sac touches the park. 6. The applicant shall construct the frontage improvements along Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street adjacent to the park, in conjunction with the park improvements. The applicant shall be reimbursed by the City for that portion of the improvements that would not otherwise be needed to handle the drainage or other impacts of the residential portion of the project. For the purpose of simplicity, the facilities shall be divided up by line item as follows: a Applicant: (i) Curb and gutter along Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street; (ii) �lrf� ) additional paving in Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street to match ultimate r half width improvements; (iii) undergrounding of utility lines along Sanford r+ 5 •�/a Street; (iv) subsurface water, sewer and storm drain facilities as shown on the final engineering plans; (v) the drainage detention area; and (vi) storm water quality cleansing facility. b) City: (i) Sidewalk along Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street (adjacent to park); and (ii) undergrounding of overhead utility poles/wires or relocation behind new curb on Vulcan Avenue, as determined by the City. 7. A grading permit shall be issued to the applicant upon approval of both the lgrT+f�11 �G tentative map and grading plans, the posting of any required grading performance �YF�Ntt. bonds, and the final map being deemed technically correct by the Engineering Services Department. 54 l �Gl4i l�l 3° eGAS 4. —a% •r, �Ij <,�h.r�5 '�- TIAII�IL- ti7 Ti+a"� PCB ?L�GriO'nG�. 02( r3�- ert�afc �3 GBNS-Ft�.u��N _ tJ�}& I frcr+S h5 I,mctr- l'lonl "ire g. The City shall expedite the improvement plan check and final map processing by striving to meet ("best of orts'� a three -week plan check turn around time by the Engineering Services Department. The applicant shall be allowed to place a sales trailer on the site once tial site improvements are in place to satisfy Fire Department requirements. SCB The applicant shall design the park to City specifications utilizing a public workshop process that involves the Leucadia neighborhood in the design process for the park. Conceptual design shall be approved by City prior to commencement of working drawings. Community Development Department SCC All future property owners shall be notified of the following: The subject property is located in a City with agricultural activity. The City of Encinitas is an urban -{-oh S \/ environment with a rich history of agriculture. It is the policy of the City of J. Fzi�zo"O' Encinitas to support agricultural uses within the community. Unless the agricultural 0,�6a5 activity constitutes a public or private nuisance under the Municipal Code, occupants of the property may experience some inconveniences associated with the legal necessary operations of the agricultural activity. Circulation SCD All construction traffic shall use Vulcan Avenue to Sanford o on purpoNo loll q� I nl 4 . construction traffic shall be allowed on Hygeia for Construction hours of operation shall comply with the City's requirements. SCE Prior to Final Map, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of North County Transit District for the location of a bus stop at Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street SCF A 10' pedestrian easement shall be provided to the northeast comer, along "D" Street on the west boundary of Lot 35. Landscaping C A landscape plan shall be subject to Design Review Permit approval by the Planning Commission. A final landscape plan shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit SCH Landscaping: Street trees shall vary in size, type and location/grouping. Sizes shall range from 24" to 48" boxes. Trees located within the rear of the homes shall be 5 and 15 gallon, depending on the screening required. Applicant shall install the street trees and front yard landscaping along Sanford Street. In all other areas, the ra —+ 7 applicant will install the sueet trees and trees in the yards as identified on the °`L4 S landscape plan and provide the homeowner with an allowance to landscape the front yard. All front yards shall be landscaped within 6 months from purchase. SCI Landscaping (particularly trees) around the edge of the subdivision shall be installed first. This would include: Sanford Street, eastern slope and north boundary. The trees along the north boundary shall vary with 2 to 3 species to be informally designed for screening purposes. SCJ Landscaping height on the east slope shall be limited to not block views from the homes on Sanford Lane. This shall be recorded through recordation of a covenant. Landscape plan shall demonstrate that views will not be blocked when plant maturity is reached. SCK An arborist shall be on -site during the grading operations around the existing Torrey pine located on the north side (off -site) of the project. Design Review SCL Minimum of 14 homes shall be single story and shall be located as depicted by the Design Review site play The single story homes shall be deed restricted to single story and the proposed height, as determined through the Design Review Pemvt process. C SCM The retaining walls shall be f dec block block sinclud keystone not li tedcto, slumpstone, split face block, p ib walls as determined though the Design Review Permit process. SCN The Design Review Permit approval shall be required prior to Final Map. The lot lines on the approved tentative map may be adjusted to accommodate potential changes that may be required in the Design Review Permit- SCO The appropriate texture of the sidewalks and rolled curbs, and the extent of the meandering sidewalk shall be determined through the Design Review Permit process. SCP Through the Design Review Permit process the location of the home on Lot 36 shall r-> be reviewed to minimize its impact on the adjacent property to the north. San Die Mgq Wster District SCQ A pressure reducing station is located in Sanford Street right -of -way at the southeast comer of the proposed subdivision. It will be the responsibility of the developer to relocate the station, if necessary, at the developer's expense. M SCR The developer shall install the water system according to San Dieguito Water District standards, and dedicate to the District that portion of the water system which is to be public. SCS The developer will be required to enter into a secured agreement with the San Dieguito Water District prior to map recordation. SCT The developer will dedicate to the San Dieguito Water District all necessary easements for that portion of the water system which is to be public water. No trees or permanent structures will be allowed in those easements. SCU The developer will be required to show all existing and proposed water facilities on improvement or grading plans for San Dieguito Water District approval. SCV A hydraulic analysis will be required which will be used to determine water system sizing and configuration. SCW Upon development, each parcel will be required to be individually metered. SCX The developer is required to comply with the San Dieguito Water District's fees, charges, rules and regulations, including installation of any required on -site and off - site facilities. SCy Water meters shall be located in the public right -of -way. No hardscape (e.g., concrete) shall be located around the water meters. In cases where water meters cannot meet these standards (in public right -of -way and out of concrete driveways/sidewalk areas), a utility easement shall be provided around the water meters to the satisfactionof the San Dieguito Water District p SCZ The District will require the water system to be looped. This will require either a Q Q9 double water line in the street or the placement of a public main through private �,. p rj (jg f,' property and the dedication of an easement, as determined by the District There will be no slopes within the easement and the easement shall be graded level. All ^A property lines along the path of the water main shall line up so that the water main will be constructed right under said property line. Fn eerineDepartment SCAR On surface drainage shall be provided within each lot from the rear of the lot to the street SCBB See EIR Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for design of storm drain pollution control. (Exhibit 1) SCCC Developer shall design and construct a storm drain system to convey storm nm- off on north side of Sanford Street. The storm drain system shall also eliminate ponding at the intersection of Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street. The storm run off shall be directed under Vulcan Avenue and discharge into an open ditch in the railroad R -O -W to satisfaction of the City Engineer. SCDD The applicant shall enter into an improvement agreement to complete a portion of the City's drainage project from Sanford Street north to Ashbury Street along the railroad right -of -way, once the City has obtained the necessary permits. This condition is in addition to the standard requirement for drainage improvements (Condition ED8). SCEE Sewer easement and sewer line shall be extended to the adjacent property line to the east to allow for future connection to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department SCFF A covenant shall be recorded on a portion of Lots 11, 12 and 13 limiting the height of the landscaping to 3' feet to insure adequate site distance as determined by the Engineering Department SCGG Applicant shall coordinate with the Post Office for mail delivery. Adjustments to the street improvements may be necessary to accommodate the number of boxes in one location - Any changes to the street improvements shall be to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services and Community Development Departments. iSCHH In order to accommodate Sanford Street re- alignment, off -site acquisition maybe required to provide ultimate rigbt -of -way beyond the road improvements. The subdivider shall conform to the Municipal Code regarding acquisition of property. SCII Vulcan Avenue shall be dedicated by the developer along the subdivision frontage based on a centerline to right -of -way width of 35 feet and in conformance with City of Encinitas Standards. (See Condition SCA for required road improvements adjacent to the park.) SCIj Sanford Street shall be dedicated by the developer along the subdivision frontage based on a centerline to right -of -way width of 25 feet and in conformance with City of Encinitas. Standards, North 101 Corridor Specific Plan. (See Condition SCA for required road improvements adjacent to the park) SCKK Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map, the Subdivider shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative map and the following improvements to City Standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: (See Condition SCA for required road improvements adjacent to the park.) Vulcan Avenue is a local circulation element with 55' right —of - -way and 42' roadway width. Developer shall dedicate additional R -O -W if need be for the centerline to property line width of 35' along subdivision boundary. Vulcan &0 Avenue shall be widened to allow a centerline to curb width of 25', plus a 5' wide sidewalk adjacent to the subdivision. Type G curb and gutter, and a PCC sidewalk shall be constructed on the eastside of Vulcan Avenue. Curb, gutter (or rolled curb) and sidewalk to be earth tone color and textured. 2. Sanford Street is a special case street with 50' right -of -way and 36' roadway width. Developer shall dedicate additional R -O -W if need be for the centerline to property line width of 25 along subdivision boundary. Sanford Street shall be widened to allow a centerline to curb width of 18' consistent with North Highway 101 Specific Plan, and a 4' wide sidewalk adjacent to the subdivision. Modified rolled curb, and a meandering PCC sidewalk shall be constructed on the north side of Sanford Street. A 4' public pedestrian access easement shall be granted on north side of Sanford led curbandallo sidewalk to be outside of the public R-O -W. Curb, g ( ) earth tone color and textured. 3. Street "B" is a local street with 44' right -of -way and 5' public utility easement on the south side. Street B shall be dedicated to the City and shall be fully improved with rolled curb on both sides, a 4' non - contiguous sidewalk and a 5 -feet landscaped-parkway on the north and West Side. The curb to curb width shall be 32' to allow parking on one side. Curb, gutter (or rolled curb) and sidewalk to be earth tone color and textured. 4. Street "A ", "C" and "D", are private streets. Street "A ", "C" and "D" shall have a 35' private street easement width. Street "A ", "C" and "D" shall be fully improved to the City standards for private streets with rolled curb on both sides. The curb to curb width shall be 32' to allow parking on one side. Curb to be earth tone color and textured. - The appropriate texture of the sidewalks and rolled curbs, and the extent of the meandering sidewalk shall be determined through the Design Review Permit process. SCLL In order to address the community character of dark skies, no streetlights are approved. SCMM In order to implement the above two conditions, modifications to the road improvement standards (which includes streetlights) shall be required. Based on the Public Road Standards, Section 4.6, Application and Modification of Standards. The City Council hereby approves the road and streetlight modifications as identified above and depicted in Exhibit 3. & No grading permit shall be issued until the map has been deemed technically correct by the City Engineer and grading plans are approved. (/ G1 SCOO A 5' utility easement shall be located on the south and east side of Street B. This is to accommodate utilities and necessary street signs. Fire Dew nt SCPP Private Street "D" shall meet the Fire Department standards for maximum road length without a cul-de -sac to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. STANDARD CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): G4 Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall cause a covenant regarding real property to be recorded. Said covenant shall set forth the terns and conditions of this grant of approval and shall be of a form and content satisfactory to the Community Development Director. G5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Municipal Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived herein. i G7 Prior to issuing a final inspection on framing, the applicant shall provide a survey from a licensed surveyor or a registered civil engineer verifying that the building height is in compliance with the approved plans for all the two story homes. G8 A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MNIRP) as set forth in Exhibit 1 of the Conditions of Approval herein referenced; shall be established and funded by the developer or property owner. The amount of funds necessary to implement the MNIRP will be determined by the Community Development and Engineering Services Departments prior to issuance of any permits for the project. G10 All retaining and other freestanding walls, fences, and enclosures shall be architecturally designed in a manner similar to, and consistent with, the primary structures (e.g. stucco- coated masonry, split -face block or slump stone). These items shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building and/or grading permits. OG1 Prior to any use of the project site pursuant to this permit, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed or secured to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. G13 The applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, School Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Flood Control Mitigation Fees, Park Mitigation Fees (Park Facility Fees as per Section 23.98.060; In -lieu fees are waived if park dedication is provided as per the Municipal Code), and Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees. Arrangements to pay these fees shall be made prior to Final Map approval to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Engineering Services Departments. The applicant is advised to contact the Community Development Department regarding Park Mitigation Fees, the Engineering Services. Department regarding Flood Control and Traffic Fees, applicable School District(s) regarding School Fees, the Fire Department regarding Fire K6gation/Cost Recovery Fees, and the applicable Utility Departments or Districts regarding Water and/or Sewer Fees. G14 A plan shall be submitted for approval by the Community Development Department, the Engineering Services Department, and the Fire Department regarding the security treatment of the site during the construction phase, the on- and off -site circulation and parking of construction workers' vehicles, and any heavy equipment needed for the construction of the project G19 Garages enclosing required parking spaces shall be kept available and useable for the parking of owner/tenantvehicles at all times. Lain dscapin LZ All required plantings and automated irrigation systems shall be in place prior to use or occupancy of new buildings or structures. All required plantings and automated i irrigation systems shall be maintained in good condition, and whenever necessary, shall be replaced with new materials to ensure continued compliance with applicable landscaping, buffering, and screening requirements. All landscaping and irrigation systems shall be maintained in a manner that will not depreciate adjacent property values and otherwise adversely affect adjacent properties. All irrigation lines shall be.installed and maintained underground (except drip irrigation systems). L3 All parking areas and driveways shall conform with Chapter 30.54 of the Municipal Code and the City's Offstreet Parking and Design Manual incorporated by reference therein. 1,4(a) All landscaping, fences, walls, etc. on the site, in any adjoining public parkways (the area between the front property line and the street) shall be nently maintained by the owner, assigns or any successors in interest in the property. The maintenance program shall include normal care and irrigation of the landscaping; repair and general replacement of plant materials and irrigation systems lots sandwaan walls, and fences cleanup of the landscaped and open areas, parking etc. Failure to maintain landscaping and the site in general may result in the setting of a public hearing to modify the approval. This condition shall be recorded with the covenant required by this Resolution. (3 S SI Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed and approved in conformance with Encinitas Municipal Code Chapter 30.60. Design Review DRI Any future modifications to the approved project will be reviewed relative to the findings for substantial conformance with a design review permit contained in Section 23.08.140 of the Municipal Code. Modifications beyond the scope described therein may require submittal and approval of an amendment of the design review permit by the authorized agency. DR2 Side and rear elevations and window treatments shall be trimmed and architecturally treated- so as to substantially match the front elevations. This treatment shall be reflected in building plans and shall be found satisfactory by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits. DR3 All project grading shall conform with the approved plans. If no grading is proposed on the approved plans, or subsequent grading plans are inconsistent with the grading shown on the approved plans, a design review permit for such grading shall be obtained from the authorized agency of the City prior to issuance of grading or building permits. C. Housin H1 Projects involving a subdivision or development proposal involving 20 or more residential units shall be required to provide an Affordable Fair Housing Marketing plan, or provide evidence that the developer/builder is a Voluntary Affirmative Marketing Agreement (VAMA) signatory and has paid the required per unit fee for MAMA administration. The Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan/evidence of being a VAMA signatory must be found satisfactory by the Community Development Department prior to approval of a Final Map, Final Parcel Map, or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. H2 The developer shall execute and record a covenant satisfactory to the Community Development Department reserving 4 (accessory) units as affordable housing units in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 24.21 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. Said covenant shall include language that these inclusionary (affordable) housing units shall be reserved in perpetuity at rent levels affordable to "very low income" households, those earning at or below 50% of the regional median income level. Income levels and affordable housing payments are established by HUD on an annual basis. Should an "in- lieu" fee for inclusionary housing be established by the City prior to building permit issuance, the property owner /developer may elect to pay that fee as an alternative to providing the units in the manner described above. Tentative Maps M2 All project grading shall conform with the approved Tentative Map. In cases where no grading is proposed at the time of the Tentative Map/Tentative Parcel Map, or in cases where the grading plan later submitted is not consistent with the approved Tentative Map /tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall be required to obtain a design review permit for grading prior to issuance of grading permits. M4 The property owner /developer shall obtain design review permits through the City for homes to be constructed on the lots resulting from the approved map, as well as all related site improvements. If the property owner /developer elects to develop the lots resulting from the approved final map as custom bomesites, the design review permit requirement may be waived by the Community Development Department pursuant to Section 23.08.030 (7) of the Municipal Code. The property owner /developer is advised to contact the Community Development Department at such time as development of the subject property is planned to determine whether a design review permit will be required. A standard covenant specifying this rm condition shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder to give constructive notice to future purchasers of the site. M6 Street names shall be approved by the City prior to the recordation of the final map, and street addresses shall be provided by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits. Mode_ l Homes Model homes in a number not to exceed that necessary to provide an example of each dwelling type being offered may be allowed in accordance with 30.46.100 of -"7- ssu the Municipal Code. That Section provides that building permits may not bed— for model homes until a final map has been recorded, or, in the alternative, that a final map has been submitted which the Engineering Services Director has determined to be in conformance with the approved tentative map and technically correct. In addition, that Section provides that prior to issuance of building permits for model homes, the applicant shall provide a site plan to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department, indicating, among other things, the location of the model homes and their relation to off - street parking, vehicular and pedestrian access, and existing and all known future development in surrounding areas. MI12 Model homes shall include at least one model designated as a "Water Efficient Landscape Model' in accordance with Section 23.26.110 of the Municipal Code, featuring elements such as hydrozones, irrigation equipment, and other elements which contribute to overall water efficiency pursuant to Chapter 23.26 of the Municipal Code. 4500, MH3 All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but shall not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, streets, and all other adjacent and all known future development. rMH5,J Any use of a trailer coach as a temporary business/sales office shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 30.46 of the Municipal Code and shall be removed upon completion of the sales program. B I BUILD -NG CONDITION(S): CONTACT THE ENCINITAS BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): 132R The applicant shall submit a complete set of construction plans to the Building Division for plancheck processing. The submittal shall include a Soils/Geotechnical Report, structural calculations, and State Energy compliance documentation (Title 24). Construction plans shall include a site plan, a foundation plan, floor and roof framing plans, floor plan(s), section details, exterior elevations, and materials specifications. Submitted plans must show compliance with the latest adopted editions of the California Building Code (The Uniform Building Code with California Amendments, the California Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Codes). These comments are preliminary only. A comprehensive plancheck will be completed prior to permit issuance and additional technical code requirements may be identified and changes to the originally submitted plans may be required. Fl FIRE CONDITION5: CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): F2 ACCESS ROADWAY DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roadways shall have an unobstructed paved width of not less than 24 feet.and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. EXCEPTION: Access to one (1) single family residence shall not be less than 16 feet of paved width. F4 TURNAROUNDS: All dead -end fire access roadways in excess of 150 feet in length and serving more than four (4) dwelling units shall be provided with a cul- de -sac. The cul-de -sac radius for public streets shall comply with city road standards. Streets constructed to private road standards where a turnaround is required shall have a cul-de -sac with a paved radius of not less than 36 feet Cul- de -sacs in commercial projects shall comply with City road standards. Alternate types of turnarounds may be considered by the Fire Chief as needed to accomplish the purpose of the Fire Code. F7 RESPONSE MAPS: Any development that by virtue of new structures necessitates fire hydrants, roadways, or similar features, shall be required to provide a map in a format compatible with current Department mapping services, r l0 and shall be charged a reasonable fee for updating all Fire Department response maps. Fg COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS: Prior to the delivery of combustible materials on the project site, water and sewer systems shall satisfactorily pass all required tests and be connected to the public water and sewer systems. In addition, the first lift of asphalt paving shall be in place to provide a permanent all- weather surface for emergency vehicles. Said access shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. F9 POSTING OF ROADWAYS: Emergency access roadways when required shall be properly identified as per Fire Department standards. Flo OBSTRUCTIONS (ACCESS ROADWAYS): All traffic lanes shall be a minimum of 24 feet in width during construction and shall be maintained clear and free of obstructions during construction in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. F11 FIRE HYDRANTS & FIRE FLOWS: The applicant shall provide fire hydrants of a type, number, and location satisfactory to the Encinitas Fire Department. A letter from the water agency serving the area shall be provided that states the required fire flow is available. Fire hydrants shall be of a bronze type. A two - sided blue reflective road marker shall be installed on the road surface to indicate the location of the fire hydrant for approaching fine apparatus. F13 ADDRESS NUMBERS: Address numbers shall be placed in a location that will allow them to be clearly visible from the street fronting the structure. The height of the address numbers shall conform to Fire Department Standards. F14 ADDRESS NUMBERS FOR STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF ROADWAY: Where structures are located off a roadway on long driveways, a monument marker shall be placed at the entrance where the driveway intersects the main roadway. Permanent address numbers with height conforming to Fire Department standards shall be affixed to this marker. F15A AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM - SINGLE - FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES: Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department_ Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. (7 ,A E1 E2 EGl ENGINEERING CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of building/grading permit issuance shall apply. Grading Conditions EG ` No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the final map, or the City has deemed the final map technically correct. EU The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any l —J clearing or grading of the site. EG4 The grading for this project is defined in Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to the Engineering Services Director and verify compliance with Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. �G5 No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. EG7 All newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeperthen 2:1.' EG8 A soilstgeological/hydraulicreport (as applicable) shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform suc r > Such report o� be submitted and approved: Prior to final map approval grading plan, as applicable. EG9 Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from the proposed construction site the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the Engineering Services Director for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the Engineering Services Director may impose with regards to the hauling operation. EG 10 In accordance with Section 23.24.370 (A) of the Municipal Code, no grading permit shall be issued for work occurring between October l st of any year and April 15th of the following year, unless the plans for such work include details of protective measures, including desilting basins or other temporary drainage or control measures, or both, as may be deemed necessary by the field inspector to protect the adjoining public and private property from damage by erosion, flooding, or the deposition of mud or debris which may originate from the site or result from such grading operations. /0 f ED1 Drainage Con ditions ED2 The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and shall construct temporary desiltation/detention basins of type, size and location as approved by the Engineering Services Director. The basins and erosion control measures shall be shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or approved by the Engineering Services Director. The developer shall maintain the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a period of time satisfactory to the Engineering Services Director and shall guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the Engineering Services Director. ED3 A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water originating within the subdivision, and all surface waters that may flow onto the subdivision from adjacent lands, shall be required. Said drainage system shall include any easements and structures as required by the Engineering Services Director to properly handle the drainage. i EDS The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the final map for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan and City of Encinitas Standards as required by the Engineering Services Director. ED8 The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from a 100 - year frequency storm under developed conditions is equal to or less than the runoff from a storm of the same frequency and duration under existing conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results. ES1 Street ES3 The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the Tentative Map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the Final Map for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. ES4 Reciprocal access and/or maintenance agreements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives or parking areas and maintenance thereof to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director. 4 f EU1 ES5 Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, a right -of -way construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Director and appropriate fees paid, in addition to any other permits required. ES8 The design of all private streets and drainage .systems shall be approved by the Engineering Services Director prior to approval of the Final Map/issuance of any grading or building permit for this project. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Encinitas Standards based on R -value tests. The standard improvement plan check deposit is required. Utiliti es EU2 The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective utility agencies regarding services to the project. EU3 The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G. & E., Pacific Telephone, and other applicable authorities. EU4 All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including existing utilities unless exempt by the Municipal Code. iEU5 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation and undergrounding of existing public utilities, as required. EU7 The design of the division of land shall provide each cable operator an opportunity to construct, install and maintain, on land identified on the map as dedicated to public utility use, any equipment necessary to extend cable television services to each residential parcel in the subdivision. This conditions shall not apply to the conversion of existing dwelling units to condominiums, community apartments, or stock cooperatives. EU8 Subject to all applicable Federal and State laws, statutes and regulations, in the event of multiple cable communication operators desiring to serve new residential developments in which the electric power and telephone utilities are underground, the following procedure shall apply with respect to access to and utilization of underground easements: (a) The developer shall be responsible for contacting and surveying all franchised cable operators to ascertain which operators desire to provide cable television service to the development. The developer may establish a reasonable deadline to receive responses from cable operators. The final tract map shall indicate the cable operator(s) that have agreed to serve the development. 740 (b) If one or more cable operators wish to provide service, they shall be accommodated in the joint utilities trench on a nondiscriminatory shared basis. (c) The developer shall provide at least (10) working days notice of the date that the utility trenches will be open to the cable operators that have agreed to serve the development. (d) Sharing the joint utilities trench shall be subject to compliance with Public Utilities Commission and utility standards. If such compliance is not possible, or if three (3) or more operators desire to provide service to the development, the developer shall provide a separate trench for the cable television cables, with the entire cost shared among the participating cable operators. With the concurrence of the developer, the affected utilities and the cable television operators, alternative installation procedures, such as the use of deeper trenches, may be utilized, subject to the applicable law. (e) Any cable operator wishing to serve an area where the trenches have been closed shall be responsible for separate trenching and associated costs; provided that if the cable operator was not provided timely written notice of the availability of such trenches, the developer shall reimburse the operator for such costs. EMI Man EM3 'Phis project is approved specifically as '(single) phase. l EXHIBIT 1 Resolution No. 2000 -62 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Greystone Homes Project (Case No. 98 -240) sCH No. 99041113 Picpayed for. C�fty Of >t» 503 S. Vulcan Avenue Encmtss, Ca)lfornia 92024 PrcC � by. Ogden Eaviroomental and Ever® Services CO, Ina S e Drive San Dicgo, fom 2121 Mal 200 70L C MITIGATION MONITORING AIr'D �pORTJNG PROGRAM for the Greystone Homes Project (Case No. 98 -240) SCH No. 99041113 May 2000 a Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 21081.6 requires �seatioa The �rfOn'r and reporting Program (MNiRP) established upon mitigation monitor It stipulate t» "ft Public agency shall of an En�onmental Impact Report )for the changes to the project whirl, it has adopt a repo ar Or comdition Monitoring roject approval in order to mitigate or avoid si designed to or m or monitoring program shall be designed to adopted cff °n the environment- Ile p. )pllementation.° A mitigation monitoring and ensue compliance during Project _ project is pt�� as Table 1. reporting Proms for the Greystone Homes bas been developed in compliance "itl' Section 21081.6 of �Q below lamented to reduce impacts T M �� (1) mitigation mcasums to be implemented amble party or monitor, Lf i j4el of sip". =or, (2) type of mitigation.) authority. and (� associated (4) mitigation tuning or provides An-ther compliance of the program - (4) The following p listed is the program arc those necessary to either reduce M i Pi°l Pam to below a level of significance as adopted or make as conditions of project approvaL classification based .e hype of mitigation measure s ation (grog on also M). activities. The bol - Dom+ which includes first typeect design Btative naps or site plans exemplified by rated into plans such The second type, on vcmc ds or grading TeCif3 des measures conducted in the eld during road mitigation (prog� symbol - C1�, motions+ t,�,PO�y dust and erosion construction activities such as �grrrent inspeot'ons. The last type is sustained control, and drainage and street imp term measures such to mitigation (program symbol - vegetation n maintenance* n8- debris tr►atntcmncc or landscape g nsible for implcmentuig or verifying 1 he program monitor is the person raspo�� a state registered civil engineer implementation of the mitigation measures, arChiled preparing a orml3 grading investigations, or a state licensed landscape IendscePe plan and certifying its implementation. 7be schedule is the point in time when mitigation mea_arres and monitoring occur+ usually PpOr to, during, or efia co>r_struction. 73 is the pin frnally ��°nblc for casurin8 that tncascity 7}x compliance suthon'ty� 5 �oR � a � City EnO erc compld lopment Director, mprescnts the project approval and p«mittin8 Commt»tY Rcncy. _ docnmeotation provides a written record of mitigation symbol prtiplu�neDt�'on. A mitigation monitoring compliance report �°� bmPjc c � tie the form of a tcntetivc map or landscape plea or n ccti5cation of implc'mentation lc= indicad4 completion of n cocas u'r i 11 "TTrP.f! 1WWir7 a hydraulic oil release be :ountered during grading :tvitles in the vicinity of the Incr sampling location S4, this it shall be selpegated and rmton andSedlmenfaffon Table 1 MITIGATION MONITOMG AND MORTING PROGRAM Tape program Monitor I Schedule mject grading scUvmes sna„ w erfotmed In accordance with pplicabie sections of Chapter 3.24 of the Encinitas Municipal :ode. Grading shall be performed coder the observation of a :Airomis registered civil engineer +vhose responsibility it shall be to ;oordii+ate site inspection and vesting to ensure compliance of the with the approved grading plan, submit reVired TeQorts the Cgervices Department, verify _......,n ■nee with Chapter 23.24 of the EncInIm r,W _C 's in WZoeds"00 Municipal Code Chapter 23.96, the iapplicurt shall pay a flood eontlO fee as determined by the Vommunity Development ovide for flood Department tO.Pr aciliti needed to serve the RAURDOUS MATERIALS DRAINAGI: AND WATLR QUALITY soils engln vil -- I permits erd during eer� et construction activity engineer nM � design mitigation; building permits Compliance Authority ?rojed Site Inspector, Apptaval by City Engineer *n tit mitlgstlon monitoring compliance report. Documentation yodai s2wpduwo Iftw -Wl i ,uolaelllw uBlsaP - yvu u2pP Ws lwulzuo 2q IIs`Is ulw4 scs� ou '90I0u"Xu wives +03 soilltuenb ad01B0uN .,sod 040 oxlpa, o, paa'l62P II°46 uo►sraldop mi Q 030} aou 330 god s iVQ4S cq P s 2q IR9s °�"'s Wo 24l. �Wuoo ul 9uppw ulssq uopu212P p2u,l -ay.dl wp Pug °I°AS ssw8 2414poq vle pwlslldwor7° 2q 11s4s (4snU,s19 2gl 8utpn12ul puv 01 da 0so41 vo mou uuols 3u uo1W111U svyogb LIPaina a 241 vin pQgslldwowfi 2q lw4 uuoWUOu 4iIM Polsloosty'21" yiv3ms30 uogsti,!3 'AuWllod uugm3o u01164uZAM ISOO4 241 sule,uoo 4o!4^a'moU uuou 4611D Ivi; pus mou uoms 411 2413o uol,a419 24i QM11178 Pus yodsu¢4,dWI1od Pu,, lu2"M o,is33o 000P2103 (I) PUI 11o41Puo: 130(Wd -Wd 2l(1 to3 w guar. ogl ulvuw 111A (Awl; uuo,s OOIt 941'-2',) 02"q slP Awad p4uu -,sod w411v4) 42ns33w4'u J1911 03s3ms u!vpp XIja odua4 01 (1 :plo3oea, 2q Ilv4s uo!svud2p sssl pus 01" ssva8 2'13o osodai ou ')µsd 241 ul411^a PoP!noid o 1i24s - (ulsaq 6opu2,2p) uolnaj& sss8 pus olsins ssua u oPaln uoll°luownoop 4po11pny oolmpdwoo MluoW wvj2Q d 2d I yltrR oua 0WI'doau QltV 014MO3 901" 11OLLYOLL'w (p2oop °OO) I °Igg.L 41l0" b jayum "Op sunssow u011u81t Table 1 (Contlaved) MITIGATION MONROMG AND REPORTING FROGRAM progrmn Monitor Schedule Compliance Authority �tion Measures Type Med In aeeerdanee with the mmendatlons of a Califomla stered ewll en racer. State reSts�T'ed civil Prior to bs mm of Approval by city x to commenceme"t of CNI engineer gang permits ,eamtlon, the contractor for the posed development shell submit iotice of intent (NOT) to the State der Resotaets Control Board WRCB) in accordance with ulrements set forth In the Porter - ldogne Water Quality Control t The contractor shell prepare a nwtnrction- related Storm Water iludon Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for to commencement of mstntction and shall retain the wPPP oroite and implement the A by city I WPPP durin tonstruction. UM State registered civil Prior to Final Msp� urfwe water Impacts resulting "Twer trbatt polltrtartt loading shall e mtdgeed through the use of IMPS. Final Storm t" �design shall dtaro for the proposed nclWe BMN specifically designed o enhance the orulte infiltration of iksolved urban pollutants ,...,r.Ined In the flrst flush. V , MV - design mitigafloa; mmcp . mhigetlon monitoring eompilance report. Documentation ration Measures final storm water design plans ne proposed prnjeet shall rporate any recommendations CaliTomia registered civil Ineer for maximir}ng the ctiveness of proposed onsite merge structures (Including the face water detention facility) in loving 0.e., Infiltrating) solved urban pollutants stained In the first flush. Table 1 (Cotttiened) N MGATION MONITORING AND pMRTING PROGRAM ,1. Proms Monitor Schedule —" -- YPe prior to Final D DM State registered civil engitueer ,per level of Lot No. *t would be ) dB ML upon implementation 'the proposed project, project sign for this lot shall comply with CR Title 24, Noise insulation Turin ig eses�d gn review, the Uny ;ncinit will that site mprove ma nts, including possible I �IgWng and glare, do not adversely affect adj'eent properties and are cotulsttmt with MunlcipalCodhall tequircmerrts. Street ligh gthe be minimal to help oftheerve dark sky chwacw community and iapP ate through 6 of the public R..A swrtdards- NOiSE Compliance Authority Approval by City Eng re mitiplan check for compliance with Title u COMMA CELARACTER v _ mitigation; ..,, DM w design Final Map, public improvement Plans, and building permit Community Development Director Documentation Community Development Director MME mitigation#41W e omplianeereport E gation Measures Table 1 (COCtlail• MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Tyre I program Monitor Illy road standards, ee Per rion A,6 of the Public Road ndards, to allow the foilowing. Sanford Street and all internal public Streets: softened street edge to be accomplished by either no curb (pavement edge provided with a concrete swale) or a rolled curb. The concrete Swale or rolled curb to be colored and texhrred to either match the street pavement or be earth tone In color. The sidewalk shall be composed of decomposed granite, soil cement, or concrete with earth tone colors. The sidewalk shs11 be provided on only one side of t. DM UM 3tre vulcan Avenue: 3!d,,Wslk3 to soil be either decomposed granite, earth cement, or concrete with tone colon. All other mad improvements along Vulcan Avenue are to meet City During Site wri r�ed st will operations, a qualified tection of be owite to ensure the O> ;ire near the northern boundary located of the project the Torrey v DM State registered Civil engineer State registered civil engineer �, ldaatlon; DM . design mitigstion; Schedule Prior to Final Map prior to Final Map Compliance Authority I Documentation Approval by City Engineer I MMCR Approval by City Engineer I MMCR Approval by City During grad'mg community Development operations Director MMCR mitigstian monitoring compliance report- i BAY LA tMEL TNT RBMM.- 9-11-2M I I I I II • I 1 I , I I � 1 . II I � Y I I � l • . . . r 1 I Y I I Y 1 � 1 I � I ` Y _ - -�- - -_ -- - -� S` J.IN10N3 30 kLID SANMRD STREET A m �o x N S O C O N Z 0 N O O O I N FASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101. SUITE A _ SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (856) 259212 . FAX (658) 2594612 EXHIBIT 3 July 25, 2000 Resolution No. 2000 -62 City of Encinitas Community Development Department _ Lo I 505 South Vulcan Ave. _. 1 Encinitas, CA 92024 Ann: pat Murphy Re: 98 -240 TMMR/CDP - 'Greystone Bay Laurel Dear Mr. Murphy, This letter will serve as our formal request, to have the Encinitas City Council review and approve the following: 1. Reduction in road right of way width to 44' for the onsite public road (Street -B'1 as conditioned per SCGG.3 in Attachment "B" of the draft resolution for the aboverefcrenced project 2. Reduction of the sidewalk width along Sanford and Street "B" from. 5' to 4'. i Attached hereto are the following exhibits for the Council's review and consideration: • Exhibit "A" -Sanford Street cross section showing 4'.wide sidewalk • Exlubit "B" - The onsite public road Street "B" w/ 44' right -of- -way, including 4' sidewalk on one side only. Also attached hereto an the following exhibits for Planning COromissi on subcommittee consideration on Design Review: • Exhibit "C"- Revised Strut `B" knuckle design to conform to the 44' right -of- way and 32' traveled way. • Exhibit "D" - Lot 40 Building reorientation. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Wayne A. Pasco president Q/ Pasco Engineering, Inc. O WP/MS /js I" - Dave Steam - Greystone EXHIBIT "All SHuwS 4' SIDEWALK ALONG S."OM - - VARIES FROM 0' TO 25' TO PROVIDE Sl"AL K MEANDR. * - VARIES FROM 0' TO 4' TO PROVIDE SIDEWALK WANDER. x /VAR ICATIM rEXISTAW A/K 15 0 y 2% // � 171 •/ 71 • a• ra a- / 4?2- EXHIBIT " � BH SHOWS 44' ULTIMATE FIGHT OF WAY FOR ONSITE PljBL_IC STFET 13' -a• �• 1 a • I J. f. IDG-BBlT licil 9-gWS REVISED I M-E LAYOUT THAT ACCDMODATES A 32' WIDE CURB TO CURB STFE T SECTION (SEE ATTADf� 5 N VIEW DESIGN STANDARo DS -15i SCALE to - t Il PLAN A tr sr e Is .a esr M2C sr .r 2V ' DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUMS puw" erla'LcNEr�ay °' SAN DIEGO COUNTY DESIGN STANDARD irm than IIU; rR MulrvL c M 3h n an olam �PPRO�ED BT n ENGINEER 11EvIs" BY FPPROvED � *368 STREET KNUCKLE �S NUMBER DS -15 EXMI T "D" SHows 111OAR E ON L0T040OF THE SCALE l' = 20' i • ATTACHMENT "E" CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2000-61 ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Cd/psm/g/reports/SR98240.PC6 9/28/2000 21 � 7 11 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS MAKING THE REQUIRED FINDINGS AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM REGARDING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GREYSTONE HOMES PROJECT (SUBDIVISION MAP) (Case No. 98 -240 TM/CDP/EIR) WHEREAS, a Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Greystone Homes Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WIMREAS, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) was prepared and circulated for public agency comments from April 22, 1999 to May 22, 1999; and WIMREAS, a 45-day public review and comment period of the completed Draft Environmental Impact Report was conducted from January 21, 2000 through March 6, 2000, and all comments received have been responded to; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report on February 10, 2000 to receive oral comments; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received public testimony on the Final Environmental Impact Report on June 15, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission certified that the Final EIR was prepared and completed in compliance with CEQA on June 29,2000; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered two appeals of the Planning Commission's approval of the Tentative Map and Coastal Development Permit at a public hearing on August 16, 2000, at which time they received public testimony on the project; Yop PSmkdd/9/M0/CC98 -240 GR EIR ceniriwian.dm WHEREAS, the City Council certified that the Final EIR was prepared and completed in compliance with CEQA on September 13, 2000, and WHEREAS, limited revisions to the draft EIR have been prepared as presented in the text and Appendix to the Final EIR to address comments made during the public review and comment period; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Encinitas has reviewed the Certified Final EIR and Errata for the Greystone Homes Project, and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the attached Findings reflect the City Council's independent judgment as the Lead Agency and that they have been completed in compliance with CEQA as presented in this Resolution as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" i NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program as revised to reflect Alternative No. 5: Alternative Project Access with 46 single family lots and 2.5 acre park, as recommended by the Department of Community Development and incorporated into the Tentatin-Map Resolution of Approval and as presented in this Resolution as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B" PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1P day of September, 2000, by the following vote, to .,� Ayes: Bond, DuVivier, Guerin, Holz Nays: Cameron Absent: None '1 Abstain: None 2 4?� ATTEST: Deborah Cervone, City Clerk C,2�k LU, I Mayor Chuck DuVivier City of Encinitas City Council UZ I EXHIBIT "A" Resolution No. 2000 -61 FINDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS REGARDING THE CERTIFIED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GREYSTONE HOMES PROJECT The City Council of the City of Encinitas hereby makes the following Findings concerning the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), identified as State Clearinghouse No. 199041113, for the Greystone Homes Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA"), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and its implementing guidelines ("CEQA Guidelines', 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq. Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings are: (1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the final EIR. (2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. (3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. Pudcdd19/MS0/CC 9$ -i10 GR EIR c rtificaiton.doc 1_ Findings Regarding Potential Significant Adverse Impacts Which Can Be Mitigated. The analysis presented in the FEIR determined that the potential significant adverse impacts of Alternative 5 — "Alternative Project Access" — as described in the FEIR and discussed below can be mitigated to a level of insignificance by adopting the mitigation measures proposed. All mitigation measures under the jurisdiction of the City as listed below and contained within the FOR which incorporates the text of the DEIR are hereby adopted and shall be incorporated into the project as approved. Pursuant to Section 15091(a)(1), the City Council does hereby find that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which will avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects listed below and identified in the FEIR: a. Hazardous Materials. Significant Effect: The FEIR identifies the prior discovery of high i conontrations of total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons/total petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil near a piece of hydraulic equipment offite. The previously recommended excavation of the impacted soil and the disposal of that soil was not completed. However, in the 1999 site visit and the subsequent 1999 soil sampling activities, there was no observation of soil, discoloration at or in proximity to that location. Facts in Support of Finding: The project applicant shall implement the mitigation measures described at Section 4.1.3 of the DEIR and incorporated into the FEIR by segregating and properly disposing offsite any discolored soil, indicative of hydraulic oil release, should such soil be encountered during site grading activities in the vicinity of the location where the prior discovery was made. PA ,FZ 14 b. Drainage and Water Ouality. Significant Effect: (1) Erosion and Sedimentation: The FEIR identifies that increased surface water velocity from impermeable surfaces onto unpaved surfaces has the potential to cause localized scour and erosion. During construction, erosion and sedimentation could occur where surface runoff is allowed to flow over graded slopes. (2) Surface Water Quality: The FEIR identifies that the proposed development has the potential to affect surface water quality on and in proximity to the project site. Short-term impacts to surface water quality include those related to potential transport of eroded soil resulting from construction activities (e.g., degradation of water quality as a result of construction - related sediment influx). In addition, long -term impacts may occur as a result of residential development (e.g., an increase in urban pollutant runoff from impervious surfaces), and incremental increases in urban pollutant loading to downstream areas. Facts in Supyort of Finding: (I) Erosion and Sedimentation: The project applicant shall implement the mitigation measures described at Section 42.3 of the DEIR and incorporated into the FEIR as follows: Project grading activities shall be performed in accordance with applicable sections of Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a California registered civil engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of the lowi work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to 93 3 the City of Encinitas Engineering Services Department, and verify compliance with Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. The project shall comply with the following applicable sections from Chapter 23.24: Section 23.24.140 — Grading Plan Sections 23.24.150 and 23.24.160 — Interim/Final Erosion and Sediment Control Plans Section 23.24.190 — Landscape and Irrigation Plan Section 23.24.200 — Work Schedule Section 2324.320 — Timing of Grading Operations Section 2324.370 — Wet Season Work Section 2324.380 — Erosion Control System Section 23.24.390 — Erosion Control Maintenance Section 23.24.400 — Dry Season Work • Section 23.24.510 — Planting of Slopes In accordance with the City's Municipal Code Chapter 23.96, the applicant shall pay a flood control fee as determined by the Community Development Department to provide for flood control facilities needed to serve the development (2) Surface Water Quality: The project applicant shall implement the mitigation measures described at Section 4.2.3 of the DEIR as modified by the mitigation measures described in paragraphs 11, 12 and 13 (pp. 2-4 and 2 -5) of the FEIR and incorporated into the FEIR as follows: A natural biofilter, which will include a grass swale and grass depression (detention basin), shall be provided within the park. The purpose of the grass Swale and grass depression shall be a1 PMI 1 twofold: (1) to temporarily detain surface water runoff such that the post- project peak discharge (i.e., the Q100 storm flow) will remain the same as for the pre - project condition; and (2) to reduce offsite sediment and pollutant transport and facilitate the filtration of the dry season flow and first flush storm flow, which contains the highest concentration of urban pollutants. Filtration of surface water associated with nonstorm flows shall be accomplished via the grass swale, whereas filtration of storm flows (i.e., those up to and including the first flush) shall be accomplished via both the grass Swale and the grass -lined detention basin acting in concert. The grass swale shall be sized to treat a run-off flow of up to 100 gallons per minute. The grass depression shall be designed to reduce the post - development storm run-off to pre- development quantities for 100 -year, 50 -year, and 10 -year storm frequencies. The grass swale and detention basin shall be designed in accordance with the recommendations of a California registered i civil engineer. Prior to commencement of construction, the contractor for the proposed development shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The contractor shall prepare a construction - related Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) prior to commencement of construction and shall retain the SWPPP onsite and implement the SWPPP during construction. Surface water impacts resulting from urban pollutant loading shall be mitigated through the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs). Final storm water design plans for the proposed project shall include BMPs specifically designed to enhance the onsite E 9100- C. Noise. infiltration of dissolved urban pollutants contained in the first ' 4 flush. The final storm water design plans for the proposed project shall incorporate any recommendations of a California registered civil engineer for maximizing the effectiveness of proposed onsite drainage structures (including the surface water detention facility) in removing (i.e., infiltrating) dissolved urban pollutants contained in the first flush. Significant Effect: The FEIR identifies potential interior noise impacts on the two -story residence to be located in Lot 413 as identified on the tentative subdivision map in that the interior noise levels for the upper story of that residence would exceed 60 dB CNEL . uppn implementation of the project. Facts in Support of Finding: The project applicant shall implement the mitigation measure described under Alternative 5 in Table 1 at page 1 -9 of the FEIR by providing a project design and building plans for the two -story residence on Lot #14 which comply with CCR Title 24 — Noise Insulation Standards — to reduce interior noise levels on the upper story of that residence to less than 60 dB CNEL. d. Community Character. Significant Effect: Light Impacts: The FEIR identifies light anticipated to be generated by the interior and exterior lighting of residences within the project, streetlights (consistent with City standards) and automobile lights as significant impacts. r 0 Visual Impacts: The required road improvements will substantially alter the informal feel to the neighboring community, which is considered a significant impact to the existing visual character. Unless protected during site preparation and grading operations, the Torrey Pine located near the northern boundary of the project site could be adversely impacted. Facts in Support of Findinft: Light Impacts: The project applicant shall implement the mitigation measures described at Section 4.7.3 of the DEIR and incorporated into the FEIR as follows: During design review, the City of Encinitas will ensure that site improvements, including possible lighting and glare, do not adversely affect adjacent properties and are consistent with Municipal Code requirements. Street lighting shall be minimal to help preserve the dark sky character of the community and appropriate modifications should be made through Section 4.6 of the Public Road Standards. .r+ Visual Impacts: The project applicant shall implement the mitigation measures described at Section 4.7.3 of the DEIR as modified by the mitigation measures described under Alternative 5 in Table 1 at page 1 -9 and paragraph 16 (p. 2 -5) of the FEIR and incorporated into the FOR as follows: Modify road standards, as per Section 4.6 of the Public Road Standards, to allow the following: - - -- Sanford Street and all internal public streets: softened street edge to be accomplished by either no curb (pavement edge provided with a concrete Swale) or a rolled curb. The concrete swale or rolled curb to be colored and textured to either match the street pavement or be earth tone in color. The sidewalk shall be composed of decomposed granite, soil cement, or concrete with earth tone colors. The sidewalk shall be provided on only one side of the street. f7 Vulcan Avenue: sidewalks to be either decomposed granite, soil ' cement, or concrete with earth tone colors. All other road improvements along Vulcan Avenue are to meet City standards. Modify road standards by accommodating a reduced right -of -way and pavement width. To ensure the protection of the Torrey pine located near the northern boundary of the project site, the following mitigation measure is required: During site preparation and grading operations, a qualified arborist will be onsite to ensure the protection of the Torrey pine located offsite near the northern boundary of the project site. a. Traffic and Circulation. Project Alternative 5 would generate 600 ADT which would have a measurable, but not a significant, traffic impact to the surrounding roadway system as described in the FEIR. The project's access point under Alternative 5 would be closer to Vulcan Avenue than shown in the originally proposed project description, but this would not change circulation patterns significantly from those in the proposed project. The Alternative's access point proposes adequate site distances based on City standards. In addition, the project applicant will as a part of the project pay to the City traffic impact fees imposed on all new development by Municipal Code Chapter 23.94. Therefore, identified potential impacts of the proposed project to Traffic and Circulation are determined to be not significant. . g { 8 2. Findings Regarding Potential Significant Impacts Determined To Be Not Significant After Analysis I in the FEIR. p a. Traffic and Circulation. Project Alternative 5 would generate 600 ADT which would have a measurable, but not a significant, traffic impact to the surrounding roadway system as described in the FEIR. The project's access point under Alternative 5 would be closer to Vulcan Avenue than shown in the originally proposed project description, but this would not change circulation patterns significantly from those in the proposed project. The Alternative's access point proposes adequate site distances based on City standards. In addition, the project applicant will as a part of the project pay to the City traffic impact fees imposed on all new development by Municipal Code Chapter 23.94. Therefore, identified potential impacts of the proposed project to Traffic and Circulation are determined to be not significant. . g { 8 b. Noise. In addition to the noise impact for which mitigation measures were imposed to reduce the impact to below the level of significance, as described above under subparagraph l.c., the FOR also identified short-term noise due to grading and construction as potential impacts and stated that, based on noise modeling results, this noise would be intermittent, short-term and would not exceed the noise levels allowed by the City's noise ordinance. Therefore, any such identified potential impacts of the proposed project from Noise are determined to be not significant C. Agricultural Resources. Because the project site is not currently being used for agricultural production, there would be no direct impact from the proposed project on agriculture. The proposed project would not irreversibly convert land currently under agricultural production to other uses. Furthermore, the project site is zoned for residential use and is not designated for special status agricultural use. Therefore, identified potential impacts of the proposed project on Agricultural Resources are determined to be not significant d. Historical Resources. The Blair -Perry house, located at 210 Sanford Street, was deemed not to be historically significant Based on the research performed for the project, it was determined that the property did not meet local, state, or national criteria for inclusion on historic registers. Therefore, identified potential impacts of the proposed project on Historical Resources are determined to be not significant e. Community Character. In addition to the community character impact for which mitigation measures were imposed to reduce the impact to below the level of significance, as described above under 9 ' subparagraph l.d., the FEIR also identified additional community character impacts from the project due to substantial alteration of the informal feel to the neighboring community because of the visual impacts of road improvements required by the City's road standards. Alternative 5 as described in the FEIR contains the following project design changes: reduction in width of street right -of -way and pavement on interior project roads, allowing for increased front yard and back yard setbacks and larger lot sizes within the project. Further, the modified road standards per Section 4.6 of the City's Public Road Standards authorize the following changes to sidewalk and curb design: Sanford Street and all internal public streets: softened street edge to be accomplished by either no curb (pavement edge provided with a concrete swale) or a rolled curb. The concrete swale or rolled curb to be colored and textured to either match the street pavement or be earth tone in color. The sidewalk shall be composed of decomposed granite, soil cement, or concrete with earth tone colors. The sidewalk shall be provided on only ..r one side of the street. Vulcan Avenue: sidewalks to be either decomposed granite, soil cement, or concrete with earth tone colors. All other road improvements along Vulcan Avenue are to meet City standards. These project design changes and modified road standards, which are incorporated into Alternative 5, have allowed the flexibility for many architectural and structural changes which add variety to the project thereby retaining the informal feel to the neighboring community. Therefore, these identified potential additional impacts of the proposed project on Community Character are deemed to be not significant. 10 Pik f. Recreational Services and Infrastructure. K Although there currently is a deficit of parkland within the City, the project applicant will provide a 2.5 -acre park with the project. The applicant would dedicate 0.61 acres of land (in lieu of paying park fees) and the City would purchase the remaining 1.89 acres of land for the park site. Any park improvements provided by the applicant would be subject to an agreement with the City for reimbursement of the expense thereof. Since the addition of this park will partially offset the City's current deficit, impacts to recreational services are below a level of significance. No impacts to sewer service would occur as the Leucadia County Water District has the available capacity to service the site. Therefore, identified potential impacts of the proposed project on Recreational Services and Infrastructure are determined to be not significant. 11 / i n EXHIBIT B RESOLUTION NO. 2000-61 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM /OZ bk 0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Greystone Homes Project (Case No. 98 -240) SCH No. 99041113 pmpamdIor ah o(m tas 5)5 S, vnlcan Avenuc Unitas, Califomia 92024 prcpamd b7.. Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co., Inc. 5510 Monhoaso Drive San Diego, California 92121 OWN May 2w H Jr /03 uuJ I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM the for Greystone Homes Project (Case No. 98 -240) SCH No. 99041113 May 2000 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 21081.6 requires that a and be established upon certification mitigation monitoring Impact program It stipulates that "the public agency shall of an Environmental Impact Rcpori (EIR). es to the project which it has adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes significant adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate ball be i designed to effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring P fitam . ensure compliance during project implementation.° A r as Table 1 onitoring and reporting program for the Greystone Homes project is presented sp has been developed in compliance with Section 21081'.6, of�CEQA and W4 the (1) mitigation measures to be implemented to reduce' t^'�v to below ai level of significance, (2) type of mitigation, (3) resporurble party or monitor. (4) mitigation t= following or schedule, (further explanation authority' the program- �sociated I� y documentation. The following pro Mitigation measures listed in the program are those necessary to either reduce significant Pmjed impacts to below a level of significance as adopted or make as conditions of project approval. • .be type of mitigation measure is a classification based on associated activities. The Lust type is project design mitigation (program symbol - DIA), which includes measures incorporated into plans such as tentative maps or site pleas exemplified by grading specifications. The second type, on road improvements or conducted in the eld during mitigation (program symbol - CM), includes measures dint � erosion constnydion activities such as grading inspections, temporary and strut improvement inspections. The last type is sustained control, and dzainage mitigation (program symbol - SN), which includes long -term measures such as debris maintenance or landscape vegetation maintenance- The program monitor is the person responsible for implementing or verifying implcmcatation of the mitigation measures. such as a state registered civil engineer puformsng grading investigations, or a state licensed landscape architect preparing a landscape Plan and certifying its implementation •The schedule is the point in time when mitigation measures cad monitoring occur, • usually prior to, during, or after construction- / a f ibe compliance authority is the person finallY t�ponn. for ensuring that measures CitY am cotnplcted as required This person, the "eCity approval Engineer or the C,Dn= uruty Development Director, represents the PT°l P royal and agency - do=ncntation provides a written record imp l� tation. A mitigation monitoring compliance MMCR) can take the form of a tentative map or landscape implementation lefts indicating completion of a measure- - of mitigation measure report (program symbol - plan or a certification of 165' i :vopv8plw ualpy rr.. liod2J o;uvlldur» 9uijoill Yk - 011 W • mulsug 6310 I(q luoiddy 'soloadsul23lS t21ad uoliinuownw ` [ipoLpnY oouvllduto•J +oluu2d sulPlinq oo MMI of l°I?d uo J2"'lsU0 EuNnp pull siluu2d IN'3'ja o�?Slloc A 117YC1a BUY& QNY 1OYNM(l S'IYI1Iz.1.YNl SIIO(rdYM 2tli O u JOj OPV.Otd o31uaw1mdoQ P00 � p q� f q i o l� P°O IJW joa p� IvdlolunW aN 096,q _ _._ ..,'.. oouaniooa uI jo jr 'C i2idsgO ql �'u s djp2A pug - )Uo=°do�Q °lily 2u1»2ulsua sai4 I 'uvld 0 � of Wody pylnbol i! 9 ns su1P'us P21.oiddv 2qi tills+ 41 m 2g! jo oouvlldwoo 2msu2 of suprA Puv uolloodsul 2116 givu!ploo; of 2q lPnls it /4lllglsuods23'"m =Ulsu2 411.1; Put "'vluwjlPO I jo uol1v1.s2sgo n j2Pu" p2uuop2d 2q livys %ulPVlD WOO ivdlolunyy ols ll H o oj° IF ddv j2ldvgoj N Iq".l tNIM 2;ugp� 161p2uuo 2d itl1ItRa m(a,t glnWgos +oilLLOYlu °'dam IK oo-Ida ONLLlIom QNY alajoM NOW jaoUYJ><a.E K I olgll Aft uOiNivawipas PUV UOIMH pug poiv22sSas og hogs Ilos sltP `Z'S uolivwl 2u41dum j2uuoj 2gljo /41ul °I1. Otp ul CONIAPM sulpsa Eultnp pawjunow2 2q omla Ilo ollniuP.(q I jo sunmvi uolpsolw Miti¢ntion Measvrts Surface Wafer Query Table 1 (Cuatlnaed) 1♦SITIGA'TION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Type pnignm Monitor Sci>cdole Compliance Authority Include a grass Swale and grass depression (detention basin), shall be provided within the pads. The purpose of the grass Swale and grass depression Shall be twofold: (1) to temporarily detain surface water runoff rich that the post - project peak discharge (l.e., the Q100 storm now) will remain the same as for the pro-pro)ed condition; end (2) to reduce offsite sediment and pollutant transport I nd facilitate the flltretlon of the dry season flow and first flush storm now, which contains the hi concentration of turban poll. Filtration of surface water assoelated with lisped Via the flows shall be accom fltredon a t of � Swale, whereas to end storm nows 01 ce those up including the nrst flush) shall be accomplished via both the grass Swale and the Bass -lined detention basin acting in conC4M The grass swsle be 0 gallons per � off now w Of or up to 10 g s ion streil mlmrte. The � ddeeP�sp�- be desigruod �ffto pm„ development Storm des for development quand� 10r 1� froq r 50-year, Tho gds and detention basin shall be State tew engineer to MMCR' mlti gation monitoring compliance report Documentation Engtneet `MMCR 1 r-, u Mitigation Measures designed in accordance with the recommendations of a California Prior to commencement of construction, the contractor for the proposed development shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) in accordance with requirements set forth in the Porter - Cologne Water Quality Control Act The contractor shall preps a construction - related Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prior to commencement of construction and shall retain the SWPPP onsite and implement the C___� Table 1 (Continued) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORT NG PROGRAM Type I program Monitor Schedule Compliance Authority Sttrfece water Impam rraU„„.s from urban pollutant loading shall be mitigated through the use of B>OS. Final storm water design plant for the proper project shall include BMPs specifically, designed to enhance the o,Ite infiltration of dissolved urban pollttan-L 0 State registered civil Prior to issuana engineer grading permits Map engineer itoring comPlianc° fEP nM -design mitigation; MMCR - mitigati,°rt City Documentation 0 7A Mitigation Measures The final storm water design plats for the proposed protect shall incorporate any recommendations of a California registered civil engineer for maximizing the effectiveness of proposed onsite drainage structures (including the surface water detention facility) In removing O.e., infiltrating) dissolved unbar pollutants Table 1 (Continued) MITIGATION MONrrORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Tape program Monitor Schedule It3 As Interior noise lave or the upper level of Lot No. would be 60 dB CNEL upon Implementation Of the proposed project, project design for this lot shalt comp Y with CCR Title 24, Noise insulation During design review, the �Iv Encinitas will ensure that site improvements , including possible lighting and glare, do not adversely T.d adjaceTrt properties and are comistem with Munla�1 requirements. Street lighting dark sky clhaecter of�� the community and appropriate modifications 4on.6 of the public Road Smndads. State reg, engineer to NOISE Compliance Authority permidplan check for compliance with Title 24 COMMUNITY CHARACTER Approval by City Eng Final Map, public improvement plats, and building permit Community Development Director Community Development Director ,..I.... mIrlvatton.. MMCR- mitigation monitoring compllance report. Documentation MMCR Table 1 (Contiaeed) 1,SITIGATI0N MONTrORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM T Program Monitor Schedule Compilance Authority �lttlgatlon Medstrrrs � �todlfy road standards, as per Section 4.6 of the Public Road Standards, to allow the following: • Sanford Street and all Internal public streets: softened street edge to be accomplished by either no curb (pavement edge provided with a concrete Swale) or it rolled curb. The concrete swele or tolled curb to be colored end taKttrred to either match the street pavement or be earth tone ln'color. The sidewalk shall be composed of decomposed granite, $oil cement, or concrete with earth tone colors. The slde*alic shall be provided on only one side of the sP WL Vulcan Avenue: sidewalks t}be either decomposed granite- erth cement, or concrete with tone colors. All other road Improvements along Vulcan Avenue are to meet City U DM IState regLqbered civil engineer :,�,,,.•..... � and B IPg During site ed arborist will ons, a quaff be Mile to ; protection of the offsite near the TMth nWrrdaryoftheproject DM State registered civil engineer .,,__.�,...• DM- deaignmitigdlon; Prior to Final Map prior to Final Map Wring grading operations Documentation Approval by City Engineer I MMCR Approval by City Engineer Director MMCR - mitlgatli� f+�ng compliance report. Development MMCR W or ATTACHMENT "F° COMMENTS RECEIVED Cd/psm/g/reports/SR98240.PC6 9/28/2000 22 /// Ze - �" Jeffrey W. and Karen L. Young 1482 Sanford Lane qy. Leucadia. California 92024 Phone: (760) 942-4642 E -MAII jeffyoungl home.com Dear Encinitas Planning Commission Members: 2 72700 �''y CITY OF ENCINITAS j Wednesday, September 27, 2000 In regards to the design review of the Greystone Property on Vulcan and Sanford, I hope you will consider our concerns about the project. We live adjacent to the property on the east side and enjoy a panoramic view of the site. We are concerned about the choice of trees. We fully support the desire to plant some mature specimens but are worried about the eventual height of some of the chosen trees as they will significantly impact our ocean view and that of many of our neighbors. As you can see from the accompanying picture, an existing mature Torrey Pine (pinus torreyana) interrupts our ocean view. Although we like the vegetation, you can see that even one more Torrey Pine could greatly restrict how much of the Pacific we see. Additionally, since we live with two very large Torrey Pines on our own property, we know the potential liability they represent. Their roots are invasive, spreading 200 feet or more, and can lift foundations and crack sidewalks and driveways as they have at our home. Their pinecones are very heavy with sharp points, and regularly fall with the potential to injure people below. Dripping sap is constant and messy. On lots the small size of Greystone's project, they would seem to be even more hazardous than they are at our home. Sunset's Western Garden Book states that Torrey Pines are fast growers and grow to 60 feet or taller. We estimate that the existing Torrey on the property adjacent to Greystone is over 100 feet. Other trees mentioned on the Landscape Plan (dated August 23, 2000) that have eventual heights of 60 feet and higher are of also of concern: London Plane Tree, Fern Pine, Coast Live Oak, Red Iron Bark Eucalyptus, Aleppo Pine, and Brisbane Box. We would like to recommend that only trees that reach the eventual height of 50 feet be considered for the project. For example, a number of draught - tolerant Palm trees might be appropriate and attractive. At least eight existing homes directly to the east of the Greystone property have ocean views that would be negatively impacted by large trees. We believe that the desire for attractive, mature landscaping can be easily satisfied without such large trees. From a landscape architecture perspective, such large specimens do not belong on the modest lot sizes on the J/407— Jeffrey W. and Karen L. Young 1482 Sanford Lane Leucadia, California 92024 Phone: (760) 9424642 E- MAIL:jeffyoung 1 @home.com Greystone property; as can be seen in the picture, it's a matter of balance. Furthermore, as described above for the popular Torrey Pine, large trees can be a significant liability, especially on smaller lots. We respectfully request that you consider these concerns in the final landscape plans. Sincerely, 113 Pat Murphy Encinitas Planning Committee Civic Center UL SEP 2 72000 . � 505 South Vulcan Avenue li �G Encinitas, CA 92024 - ' RE: Landscaping for Greystone Project at corner of Vulcan and Sanford / Street. Mr. Murphy, I understand that the landscaping for this project will be discussed at your Oct. 5'b meeting, this letter is to state some concerns our neighborhood has with some of the foliage being suggested for use. From my understanding Greystone is grading down to built the homes so that they do not obstruct the view of homes behind them, we ask that the typesof-trees used be looked'at in-th6 -same manner. There are many homes - ; Wj6p d-tts- and- to-ea— c�-sid us- at manage to have a view out a window or two that one tree could wipe it all out. We already have a Torrey Pine down there that has caused grief to many neighbors. Those things grow huge if there is no maintanance or pruning of the tree. I believe that for our area we have an abundance of trees to select from to give the new owners shade, landscaping and we can maintain our views. Also, Greystone usually puts in what they call their CC &R's for their developments. I have a friend that lives in a Greystone project in La Costa and in his CC &R's it is written that he can not let a tree grow higher then 30 fr. or plant a tree in such a way to block a neighbors view. So Greystone can implement these same procedures in this development. We ask that you consider this items when implementing the plan. Sincerely, Bill and Sally 1462 Sanford Lane Leucadia, Ca. /i9 r ATTACHMENT "G" DESIGN REVIEW SITE PLAN FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANS Cd/psm/g/repOrts/SR98240.PC6 9/28/2000 23 //.400, ATTACHMENT "H" FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED) SHOULD YOU NEED AN ADDITIONAL COPY, PLEASE CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. (760/633 -2684) Cd/psm/o"mts/SR98240.PC6 9/28/2000 24 //4 -- 1 ATTACHMENT "G" DESIGN REVIEW SITE PLAN FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANS Cd/psm/g/reports/SR98240.PC6 9282000 23 //S ATTACHMENT "H" A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED) SHOULD YOU NEED AN ADDITIONAL COPY, PLEASE CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. (760/633 -2684) Cd/psm/g/reportstSR98240.PC6 9/2W000 24 //4 4 ,Cf 144- � l — F11C:]Z:iW- December 22, 1998 David Stearn Greystone Homes 5973 Avenida Encinas, Suite 101 Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Staff comments on the Park Site Proposal at the northeast comer of Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street, Letter Dated December 3, 1998 Greystone Homes Tentative Map, Case # 98 -240 TM/BA/CDP Dear Mr. Stearn: Thank you for taking the opportunity to meet with City staff to discuss the possible park site at the northeast comer of Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street. City staff has reviewed your proposal as identified in your letter dated December 3, 1998. The following comments are provided: 1. Bullet #1 and #2: Regardless of how much land is dedicated or acquired, the City needs 1 net acre of land. All dedication and acquisition should be based on net acreage. 2. Bullet #2: The value of the land shall be determined by an appraisal of the property prior to any entitlements or Greystone's actual purchase cost of the property on a square foot basis, whichever is less. The City will share in the cost of the appraiser, if the appraiser is mutually agreed upon. 3. Bullet #3, Last sentence: "Please note that the actual acreage may not be exactly one acre but shall be relatively close, within 500 square feet. so as to be acceptable to City Staff." 4. Bullet #4: The City is reviewing the appropriate process to allow the Council to review the park acquisition issue and the Planning Commission the Tentative Map. 5. Bullet #5: See comment #2 above. 6. Bullet #7: The design of the park shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director. Greystone Homes to provide park cost estimate for evaluation cWpmf.gr122298.1v 1 by the Community Services Department. If the City can construct the park for less than the estimated park costs, the City would then construct the park. Road improvements along Vulcan Avenue and portion of Sanford Street abutting the neighborhood park shall be the responsibility of the applicant. The Director of Engineering Service has reviewed this issue and noted that the applicant should construct all of the frontage improvements due to project size, location, access and drainage issues. 7. Bullet 8: Note: For the park to be opened to the public, the turf will require an adequate period of time to be established. 8. Bullet 9: The existing Code does not allow for a grading permit to be issued prior Final Map. Please review the above comments. Most of the comments reflect the discussion at our previous meeting. As discussed, the park acquisition issue requires City Council authorization. This item has been tentatively scheduled to the January 20, 1999, City Council meeting. Should you have any questions, please call me at 760/633 -2696. Sincerely, %Patrick Murp Y Project Planner cc: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Jim Benson, Assistant City Manager Sandy Holder, Community Development Director Alan Archibald, Engineering Services Director Dave Wigginton, Community Services Director Bill Weedman, City Planner Tom Curriden, Senior Planner Dave Moore, Senior Deputy Fire Marshal ,/Blair Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer Scott Englehorn, Environmental Consultant Kristine Zortman, Greystone Homes, 5973 Avenida Encinas, Suite 101, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Wayne Pasco, Pasco Engineering, 535 N. Highway 101, Suite A, Solana Beach, CA 92075 cd/p=fgr122299.1tr 2 CREYSTONE HOMES. INC.: LENNAR HOMES 5973 Avenida Encmas Suite 101 Carlsbad. CA 92008 Office 760.804-7700 Fax 760 -804 -7716 December 3. 1998 Mr. Dave Wigginton Mr. Bill Weedman Mr. Pat Murphy CITY OF ENCIMTAS 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 920243633 -7777777- RE: Possible Park Site at N.E. Corner of Sanford & Vulcan Gentlemen: CRI )i5I0NI I IC)�11 5 Greystone Homes has considered Staff's request to provide for a park at the aforementioned location, as part of the Tentative Tract Map, and has listened to concerns regarding the lack of park facilities in this neighborhood of Leucadia. While we are willing to discuss the possibilities of a park in an effort to address the City's request, we do not concede that we are legal!, obligated to do anything other than pay in lieu fees for park mitigation. It should also be noted that we do not currently own the aforementioned park parcel and the current property owner would have to participate in any decision regarding any dedication of land as well as to the following parameters: • After recordation of the Final Map and Greystone has assumed control of the entire property, we would dedicate to the City, the portion of the park land required, pursuant to Chapter 23.98 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. based on the number of single family lots on the approved Tentative Map (currently 0.48 acres for 57 units: the "dedicated park land "). In exchange for this dedication. Greystone would be absolved from the payment of in -lieu fees. 2-- The City would purchase from Greystone the remainder of the park land as shown on the approved Tentative Map (currently estimated to be 0.52 acres: the "remaining park land "), concurrent with the above referenced dedication. 3 • The park would be rectangular in shape, running the entire length of the property's frontage alone Vulcan, with a depth that allows for the most efficient use of the remaining residential property, but no less than 100 feet. Please note that the actual acreage may not be exactly one acre but shall be relatively close, so as to be acceptable to City Staff. y• the City Council should commit to the expenditure of sufficient funds to purchase the remaining park land. prior to the tentative map being heard at Planning Commission. If this will delay the processing of the tentative map beyond the schedule currently anticipated. then (ircystone shall be allowed instead to process concurrently the existing tentative map. amended to address Staff comments other than the park and a yet to be filed tentative map which will include the park site (or a map showing both options). The appropriate map would I lien proceed to final map, pending City Council's decision on whether or not to acquire the remaining park land. The City Councif decision shall be forthcoming within 60 days of the Planning Commission hearing on the tentative map so that final engineering may be started in a timely manner. 1j • The cost of the land would be determined by an appraisal of fair market value, based upon the loss of residential land use and comparable purchases for park land in similar locations. The appraiser selected shall be agreed upon by both parties. (fi • Greystone and the City would enter into an escrow upon approval of the City Council to acquire the park, but prior to recordation of the Final Map. The payment for the remaining park land and close of escrow would occur when the park improvements have been completed by Greystone and inspected by the City, and the City is ready to accept the park. 7 • Greystone shall front the cost of improving the park, per plans proposed by Greystone and approved by the City. Greystone and the City shall enter into a reimbursement agreement prior to dedication of the park. The City shall reimburse Greystone for the improvement costs, with interest calculated at the prime rate, within one year of dedicating the park to the City. This shall include the cost of any frontage improvements that would not be otherwise required of the project if the City were improving the park. • The completion and dedication of the park (and thus. opening of the park to the public) shall occur prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy being granted, but Greystone shall be allowed to pull building permits and final the model homes prior to the dedication. • In order to expedite the improvement and dedication of the park, the City shall allow Greystone to pull a grading permit for the entire property, including the park (to balance the whole site), upon approval of rough grading plans and posting of the grading bond with the City, but prior to final map recordation. In summary, Greystone is amenable to assisting the City with the dedication and improvement of the one acre park. subject to this outline of parameters. Greystone looks forward to working with the City and moving forward with this project. Since time is of the essence. we would need to schedule the appraisal and be put on the City Council agenda as soon as possible. Please let me know how we should proceed and feel free to contact me in the mean time if you have any questions or comments. Warmest Regards. GREYSTONE HOMES. INC. David Steam Director of Forward Planning San Diego Division XC: Todd Palmaer, Greystone Kristine Zortman. Grevstone Wayne Pasco, Pasco Engineering Greg Garratt. Stephenson. Worley City Of Encinitas October 19, 1998 David Stearn Greystone Homes 5973 Avenida Encinas, Suite 101 Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Status of the issues discussed October 15, 1998 Greystone Homes Tentative Map, Case # 98 -240 TMBA/CDP The following provides the status of the issues raised at the October 15, 1998, meeting: 1. Information regarding the City's General Plan Recreation Element and Park Service Area Map has been forwarded to Scott Englehom, environmental consultant, for his review and evaluation of the recreational facility /services for the Leucadia area. 2. Mr. Englehom noted that for the on- street parking evaluation to be reliable a traffic consultant should review this issue. It is suggested that Greystone Homes contact the traffic consultant, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, to provide a letter report regarding this issue. The City would then review the report for adequacy. 3. The Engineering Services Director determined that the Sanford Street alignment issue can be handled through a condition requiring off -site acquisition. 4. Whether or not a secondary, emergency access is needed across the park will not be resolved until Dave Moore returns from vacation later this month. Should you have any questions, please call me at 760/633 -2696. Sind el�y,� t ck� urpH Project Planner cc: Tom Curriden, Senior Planner Dave Wigginton, Community Services Director Dave Moore, Senior Deputy Fire Marshal -'Blair Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer Scott Englehom, Environmental Consultant Kristine Zorunan, Greystone Homes, 5973 Avenida Encinas, Suite 101, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Wayne Pasco, Pasco Engineering, 535 N. Highway 101, Suite A, Solana Beach, CA 92075 )4'3;_,h00 I .V, - -,63 -2627 Vli �. '.�ulean Avenue. Encinitas. i .�Lturnia Cll' i -:��:; � � � � reeyded Paper EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION STORM EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, CONVEYED TO THE NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD IN QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 1992 AS DOCUMENT 1992 - 0802209 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE, AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF, BEING A 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, LYING 5.00 FEET EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF VULCAN AVENUE (SAID CENTERLINE LYING 25.00 WESTERLY OF BLOCK 27 AND BLOCK 34 OF NORTH LEUCADIA ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. MAP 524), WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SANFORD STREET, THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VULCAN AVENUE SOUTH 15 005'01" EAST, 50.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 054'59" WEST, 25.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF VULCAN AVENUE AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 74 054'59" WEST, 9.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 22.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 75 051'52 ", A DISTANCE OF 29.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS. THE SIDELINES OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID VULCAN AVENUE. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. HAEL S. B PLS 6922 3 /Z/, DATE SBBO, INC. Bay L8u27 Job No 57142 08, March 13, 2001 1 of 1 Di57142VegalsWCTD -2 DA TA TABLE AIYEAR 1NG RADIUS LENGTH EXH IB I T *18 itp S15W'01 wE 50.25' 2 LOT 47 46 25.00' 3 57454'59'W PARK ,77E .9 00' 4 7551'52' 22.00' 29.13' e �mN � $va e 1 LOT 48 PARK SITE i N CITY OF ENCINITAS to �i � z TRACT NO. 98 -240 z e mo' BA Y LAUREL 2 d ~ SANFGRD STREET 'Z f I I I I I I I I DA TA TABLE ® /ND /CA TES 10' IWDE PUSUC STORM DRAIN EASWENT NOPPY SAN DIEGO COUNTY IRAN -9T DEb£LO°MENT BOARD, SEE S7/EET 2 FOR DETAILS: LA COSTA AW.. R.R. -- TRACKS _ S /T£ SAS i J, \ s O1 INDICATES PROPOSED TRACT YEUCAD /A NO. 98-240. &w. V/C/N/TY MAP (OFFS ITE EASEMENT) NOT TO SCALE STORM DRA /N EgSEMENTNNORTH SAN D IEGO COUNTY SB TRANS IT DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECT /ON 4, TI SS, RM S.B.M. 1 CF 2 &10 3 -22 -01 57142X16.DNG 51742. UV AIYEAR 1NG RADIUS LENGTH 1 S15W'01 wE 50.25' 2 S7454'59'W 25.00' 3 57454'59'W .9 00' 4 7551'52' 22.00' 29.13' ® /ND /CA TES 10' IWDE PUSUC STORM DRAIN EASWENT NOPPY SAN DIEGO COUNTY IRAN -9T DEb£LO°MENT BOARD, SEE S7/EET 2 FOR DETAILS: LA COSTA AW.. R.R. -- TRACKS _ S /T£ SAS i J, \ s O1 INDICATES PROPOSED TRACT YEUCAD /A NO. 98-240. &w. V/C/N/TY MAP (OFFS ITE EASEMENT) NOT TO SCALE STORM DRA /N EgSEMENTNNORTH SAN D IEGO COUNTY SB TRANS IT DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECT /ON 4, TI SS, RM S.B.M. 1 CF 2 &10 3 -22 -01 57142X16.DNG 51742. UV EXH IB IT 18 0 Jm'* w °v> N O 41 h BOO ZWN 0 2 2� A =7551'52', R =2200' J L =29.13' -FV 7'10J 7V -4 7-15-S, IS717 ,5- Ai Fw J Q v J S7454'59"W 9.00' S7454'59'W 25 00' T.P.O.B. LEGEND ® INDICATES 10' 1110E PUBLIC SWM DRAIN EASEMENT NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY 77?AN57T DEka6PMENT 80ARD O1 INDICATES PROPOSED TRACT NO. 98 -240. LOT 48 PARK SY] FA SUBDI VISYGWI BOUNDARY P.O.B. (7)P) SANFORD N STREET h 0 A h STORM DRAIN £AS£A/£NT- -NORTH SAN DIEGO TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECT /ON 4, T13S, R4W S.B.M. COUNTY 2 OF 2 3 -22 -01 57142X17.DNG 57142.OU I BAY LhURF| STORM EASEMENTS #57142.08 M5B 3/21/01 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E C/L lU' STORM EASEMENT HCCR05$ NCTD R/W (VULCAN 9f49.75) 102 1972029.431 6238566.459 C/L 5ANFORD & VULCAN S 15/05/01 E 50.25 211 1971980^917 6238579.535 9+49"75 VULCAN S 74/54/59 W 25,00 212 1971974.411 6238555^396 POB 5 74/54/59 W 9.00 213 1971972.069 6238546.706 N 15/44/15 W 22.00 214 Arc center 1971993.244 6238540"739 D= 75/51/52 L= 29.13 C= 27.05 ST= 17,15 S 60/07/37 W 22.00 215 1971982.286 6238521^662 TERM Closure: S 13/05/32 E 0^004 -0.004 0.801 HAY LAUREL. STORM EASEMENTS 057142.08 MSB 3 /21/01 Point Hearing Distance N Coordinates E U/I 10' K FORM EASEMENT ACCROSS NCTD R/W (VULCAN 1.07 .58 ) 102 1972029.431 6238566.459 C/L SANFORD & VULCAN N 15/05/01 W 307.58 206 1972326.417 6238486.418 13 +07.58 VULCAN S 74/58/09 W 225.00 207 1972319.934 6238462.273 POB WEST Closure:,.: S 05/03/20 E 207 S 74/58/09 W 208 N 10/44/15 W 209 Arc center D= /0/51/52 L= S 60/07/37 W 210 Closure: N 03/33/45 W 0.004 - 0.003 0.000 1972319.934 6238462.273 9.00 1972317.600 6238453.581 22.00 1972338.775 623844/.614 29.13 C= 27.05 ST= 17.15 22.00 1972327.817 6238428.537 TERM 0.001 0.001 -- 0.000 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: After recording mail to: Attn: Real Estate Department North County Transit District 810 Mission Avenue Oceanside, California 92054 NO FEES DUE - FOR BENEFIT OF PUBLIC AGENCY Only) APN: 254- 052 -14 (Space above this line for County Recorders Use EASEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND THE CITY OF ENCINITAS 1. Purpose and Intent THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement ") is made and entered into as of the effective date of , 2001, (the "Effective Date ") by and between the North San Diego County Transit Development Board ( "NCTD "), and the City of Encinitas (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee" or "City "); and WHEREAS, NCTD owns a Right -of -Way for railroad purposes which it uses for public transit and freight; and WHEREAS. NCTD has policies regulating and governing the use of its Rights - of -Way; and WHEREAS, the Grantee has applied for the issuance of a Easement in accordance with such policies; and WHEREAS, NCTD has analyzed fully and considered the technical ability, financial condition, and legal qualifications of the Grantee, and WHEREAS, NCTD, after such consideration, analysis and deliberation has approved and found sufficient the technical, financial and legal qualifications of the Grantee: and WHEREAS, NCTD has considered and analyzed the plans of the Grantee for the location and installation of storm drain facilities and found the same to be adequate, feasible and in the public interest; and WHEREAS, the storm drain facilities have been located so as to minimize the chance that they will interfere with NCTD's future use of the property for public transit purposes; and WHEREAS, NCTD and the Grantee have agreed to be bound by the conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. Grant of Easement 2.1 There is hereby granted by NCTD to the Grantee, in perpetuity, the right to construct, use, operate, own and maintain the storm drain facilities (the "Facilities ") on NCTD's property described in Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" (the "Premises ") subject to applicable local, state and federal law and this Agreement. 2.2 Without reducing its power to adopt and enforce ordinances and regulations necessary to the health, safety and welfare of the public, NCTD hereby grants to Grantee authority to use certain public rights -of -way. 2.3 Grantee shall not increase or decrease or permit to be increased or decreased the ground elevations of the Premises existing at the time this Easement is executed. 3. Easement Not Exclusive This Easement conferred in Section 2 above is non - exclusive. The Grantee shall respect the rights and property of NCTD and other authorized users and owners of rights -of -way, easements, power poles, street light poles, vaults, and conduits. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, disputes between the Grantee and parties other than NCTD over the use of the easements, power poles, street light poles, vaults, conduits and other rights -of -way shall be submitted to NCTD for resolution. Grantee expressly agrees the Facilities shall not interfere with any and all uses of the surface property. 4. Relocation The Grantee shall, after receiving written notice from NCTD, in a time and manner mutually agreed upon, remove and relocate any City Facility(ies) constructed pursuant to this Easement Agreement that NCTD determines interferes with NCTD's current or future use of its property for public transit purposes. Said City Facility(ies) may be relocated within NCTD's right -of -way if it is feasible to do so. 5. Amendment of Easement Agreement Nothing shall preclude the parties from amending this Agreement in accordance and consistent with the Policy. 6. Compensation From and after the Effective Date of this Agreement and throughout the full term of the Easement, the Grantee shall not be subject to an annual fee. 7. Compliance with Policies; Other Laws; Contracts; Severability 7.1 The Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable terms, conditions and requirements of NCTD's policies regarding rights -of -way and other NCTD ordinances, rules and regulations, unless specifically amended herein; and to comply with all applicable laws and regulations of the federal, state, county, local governments and all administrative agencies thereof, including but not limited to judicial orders. 7.2 If any provision of this Agreement or any related agreement is held by any court or by any federal, state, or county agency of competent jurisdiction to be invalid as conflicting with any federal, state or county law, rule or regulation or contract now or hereafter in effect, or is held by such county or agency to be modified in any way in order to conform to the requirements of any such law, rules and regulations or contract, said provision shall be considered as a separate, distinct and independent part of this or such other Agreement, and such holding shall not affect the validity and enforceability of all other provisions hereof or thereof. In the event that such law, rules and regulations or contract, is subsequently repealed, rescinded, amended or otherwise changed, so that the provision hereof or thereof which had been held invalid or modified is no longer in conflict with the law, rules and regulations or contract then in effect, said provision shall thereupon return to full force and effect and shall thereafter be binding on the parties hereto, provided that NCTD shall give the Grantee sixty (60) days' written notice of such change before requiring compliance with said provision. 7.3 Grantee shall not use, generate, store, release or dispose of any hazardous material or substance on, under, about or within the Premises in violation of any law or regulation. Hazardous material or substance shall mean petroleum or any petroleum product, lead, asbestos, or any substance known by the State of California to cause cancer and/or reproductive toxicity, and /or any substance, chemical or waste that is described as hazardous, toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation. 3 8. Indemnification Grantee agrees to protect, save, defend and hold harmless NCTD and its Board and each member of the Board, the San Diego Northern Railroad, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation ( "AMTRAK ") and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company ( "BNSF "), their officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, liabilities, expenses and damages of any nature, including attorneys' fees, for injury or death of any person, or damage to property, or interference of use of property, arising out of or in any way connected with the negligent acts, errors, or omissions or wilful misconduct by Grantee, Grantee's agents, officers, employees, subconsultants, or independent consultant's hired by Grantee. The only exception to Grantee's responsibility to protect, save, defend and hold harmless NCTD, is due to the sole negligence, wilful misconduct or active negligence of NCTD. This hold harmless agreement shall apply to all liability regardless of whether any insurance policies apply. Any policy limits shall not limit the amount of indemnification to be provided by Grantee. 9. Taxes Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to exempt the Grantee from any tax levy or assessment which is or may be hereafter lawfully imposed. Notice is hereby given pursuant to Revenue and Tax Code Article 107.6 that this Easement may create a property interest subject to property taxation and may subject Grantee to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest. 10. Condemnation If all or part of the Premises is acquired by eminent domain or purchase in lieu thereof, Grantee acknowledges that it will have no claim to any compensation awarded for the taking of the Premises or any portion thereof, including Grantee's interest in the Premises. Grantee also acknowledges that it will have no claim to any compensation paid as severance damages, or for loss of or damage to Grantee's improvements. 11. Relocation Assistance Waiver Grantee is hereby informed and acknowledges the following: 11.1 By entering into this Easement, Grantee may become entitled to receipt of "relocation assistance benefits" ( "Relocation Benefits') pursuant to the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. § 4601 et seq.) and /or the California Relocation Assistance law (Cal. Gov. Code § 7260 et seq.) (collectively, the "Relocation Statutes "), if NCTD makes use of the Premises in such a way as to 'displace' Grantee from the Premises. Pursuant to the Relocation Statutes, NCTD may become obligated to make relocation benefit payments to Grantee even when displacement of Grantee does not otherwise constitute a default of NCTD's obligations pursuant to this Easement. 4 11.2 Relocation Benefits payments to "displaced persons" may include payment of (i) the actual and reasonable expense of moving himself or herself and a family, business, or farm operation, including personal property, (ii) the actual cost of re- establishing a business or farm operation, but not to exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or (iii) payment in lieu of moving expenses of not less than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) or no more than Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000). 11.3 In consideration of NCTD's agreement to enter into this Easement, Grantee hereby waives any and all rights it may now have, or hereafter obtain, to Relocation Benefits arising out of its occupancy of the Premises pursuant to this Easement and releases NCTD from any liability for payment thereof. Grantee, further, shall in the future execute any further documentation of the release and waiver provided hereby as NCTD may reasonably require. 12. Vibration and Noise From Train Operations Grantee hereby recognizes and acknowledges that railroad tracks are located on or adjacent to the Premises, and that the operation of trains over the tracks does and will produce vibrations and noise levels which may be considered objectionable by the employees, agents, tenants, or invitees of the Grantee. With knowledge and understanding of these facts, Grantee by execution of this Agreement, accepts the Premises and agrees that no legal action or complaint of any kind whatsoever shall be instituted against NCTD by Grantee or on Grantee's behalf as result of vibrations and noise levels or as a result of the use of the railroad tracks in general. Grantee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless NCTD against any loss, damage, liability or expense which might occur as a result of such action being taken by Grantee, its employees, agents, tenants or invitees or anyone on Grantee's behalf. The term "NCTD" as used in this Section includes any railroad company operation on the tracks. 13. Construction 13.1 Any work performed or caused to be performed by Grantee on the Premises shall be performed (a) at Grantee's sole cost and expense, (b) in accordance with any and all applicable laws, rules and regulations (including NCTD's rules and regulations) and (c) in a manner that is satisfactory to NCTD and which meets or exceeds the then applicable standards of the industry for such work. Grantee shall submit work plans to NCTD for review and approval prior to commencement of any construction, reconstruction, installation, restoration, alteration, repair, replacement or removal (other than normal maintenance) (hereinafter, "Work ") on the Premises. Except in cases of emergency, Work must be carried out pursuant to work plans approved in writing by NCTD. In addition, Grantee shall provide NCTD and all holders of underground utility facilities located with the Premises with at least 7 calendar days written notice prior to commencement of any Work on the Premises pursuant to Section E 15 below. In the event of an emergency, Grantee shall notify NCTD's representative personally or by telephone prior to commencing any Work. Upon completion of any Work, Grantee shall restore the NCTD property to its condition immediately preceding the commencement of the Work, unless otherwise requested by NCTD. 13.2 Non - interference. Grantee agrees that no Work by itself or its authorized agent will interfere with any railroad operations on the right -of -way. 13.3 Reimbursement of NCTD. Grantee shall reimburse NCTD, within 30 days of invoice, for all cost and expense incurred by NCTD (including a 7.2% administrative fee) in connection with any Work. These costs include, but are not limited to, consultants fees, mark out of railroad facilities, the expense of furnishing inspectors, security and flag protection as NCTD deems necessary, the installation and removal of false work beneath tracks, equipment rentals and restoration of NCTD right -of -way to the same condition as when Grantee entered thereon. 13.4 Flag Protection. Flag Protection shall be required when Grantee's operations on or adjacent to the railroad right -of -way present a danger to NCTD's rail facilities. NCTD in its sole discretion, shall determine the need for Flag Protection. 13.5 Crossing Right -of -Way. No vehicular crossing over NCTD's tracks shall be installed or used by Grantee without prior written permission of NCTD. 13.6 NCTD shall have the right to enter the Premises to post notices of non - responsibility. Grantee shall not permit any mechanics' or other liens to be filed against the Premises or against its interest herein by reason of labor and materials furnished to the Premises at Grantee's insistence or request. If any such lien is filed against the Premises, Grantee shall cause the lien to be discharged of record, either by payment of the claim or by posting and recording a bond pursuant to California Civil Code 3143, within twenty (20) days after demand by NCTD. Grantee shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend NCTD from and against any such lien. 13.7 The Grantee shall pay for any grade crossing protection and safety devices that NCTD is required to install as a result of this Easement pursuant to the safety rules, regulations and laws of the State of California, the California Public Utilities Commission or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction over railroad safety requirements. 13.8 If required by NCTD, Grantee shall, at its sole cost and expense, install barrier fencing, K -rail and /or landscaping to shield the railroad track area from public access and /or the improvements thereon from public view. NCTD shall have the right to review and approve fencing and /or landscaping plans prior to installation. Grantee shall not install or use any underground storage tanks on the Premises. 2 13.9 Grantee shall provide NCTD with the results of all tests and studies conducted on NCTD property. 13.10 Notice of Construction. At least 7 days prior to the start of any work on the right -of -way, Grantee shall provide notice to NCTD's Real Estate Department (760) 966- 6504 (810 Mission Ave., Oceanside, CA 92054). 13.11 Notice of Excavation. Grantee shall provide notice to DIG -ALERT at (800) 422 -4133 and to MCI Telecommunications Corporation at (888) 258 -0808 prior to any excavation in the Right -of -Way. 14. Maintenance and Repair Grantee shall, at its sole expense, maintain the Premises in a condition satisfactory to NCTD during the term of this Agreement including performance of all maintenance and clean -up of the Premises and any improvements thereon as necessary to keep both in good order and condition, in accordance with applicable governmental codes. Grantee shall be responsible for any citations issued by any agency having jurisdiction as a result of Grantee's failure to comply with local codes. 15. Service of Notice 15.1 Except as otherwise provided in Article 15, all notices required or permitted to be given to either party by the other party under any provisions of this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed served: a) When delivered by hand or by Federal Express or similar service to that party's address set forth below during normal business hours; or b) When mailed to any other person designated by that party in writing herein to receive such notice, via certified mail, return receipt requested. 16.2 Notice shall be given to the following: a) If to NCTD: North San Diego County Transit Development Board 810 Mission Avenue Oceanside, CA 92054 Attn: Real Estate Department b) If to Grantee: City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 Attn: Director of Engineering Services 17. Laws, Venues, and Attorneys' Fees This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of San Diego, State of California. In the event of any claim, legal action or proceeding between the parties arising under or concerning this License, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses as part of the judgment resulting therefrom. 18. Acknowledgment that Terms are Understood The Grantee acknowledges that it has read and fully understood the terms of both the agreement and the ordinance and agrees to be bound by the same. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have signed below, effective as of the Effective Date, by their duly authorized representatives. North San Diego County Transit Development Board By:_ Name: Title: Attest: City of Encinitas By: %6� �, LLW- Name: Mays 1, ArC Title: CL Tj :EI�14 Iyy P2 1- Attest: 9 State of California ) County of San Diego ) On DATE personally appeared before me, NAME, TITLE OF NOTARY NAME(S) OF SIGNER(5) personally known to me -OR- proved to me of the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledge to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Title or Type of Document Number of Pages th5 CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER INDIVIDUAL(S) CORPORATE OFFICER(S) PARTNER(S) ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) SUBSCRIBING WITNESS GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) Date of Documen Signer(s) Other Than Named Above .1 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION STORM EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. CONVEYED TO THE NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD IN QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 1992 AS DOCUMENT 1992 - 0802209 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE. AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF, BEING A 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, LYING 5.00 FEET EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF VULCAN AVENUE (SAID CENTERLINE LYING 25.00 WESTERLY OF BLOCK 27 AND BLOCK 34 OF NORTH LEUCADIA ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO MAP 524), WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SANFORD STREET; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VULCAN AVENUE SOUTH 15 005'01" EAST, 50.25 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 74 °54'59" WEST, 25.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF VULCAN AVENUE AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 74 054'59" WEST, 9.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 22.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 75 051'52 ". A DISTANCE OF 29.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS. THE SIDELINES OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID VULCAN AVENUE. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 3 /Z /, HAEL S. BUtTCHER, PLS 6922 5880, INC Job No 57142 08 , March 13, 2001 1 Of 1 a _ to o a No. 0122 t .e �rarF OF C Bay Laurel O 07142VegalskNCT0-2 A 0 3 O �Q Z�N �O= a� J Q U DATA TABLE EXH IB I T "Bjw LOT 47 PARK STE LOT 48 PARK 9)rE m CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -240 BAY LAUREL LEGEND ® /ND /CA TES 10' WDE PUBLIC STORM DRAIN EASEMENT NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY 7RANSYT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, SEE -wEET 2 FOR DETAILS O7 INDICATES PROPOSED TRACT NO. 98 -24a (OFFSITE EASEMENT) i LA COSTA A PE R. R. 7RApCS ' � z N► w A ON SITE BLVD. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT --NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY im TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD M. SECTION 4, T13S, R4W S.B. 1 a< 2 3 -22 -01 57142X16.DNC 57142.09 AR/NG RAD/US I LENGTH 1 S75'051010E 50.25' 2 57454'59'W 25010' 3 S74 54'59"W 9.00" 4 7551'52" 22.00" 29.13' LEGEND ® /ND /CA TES 10' WDE PUBLIC STORM DRAIN EASEMENT NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY 7RANSYT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, SEE -wEET 2 FOR DETAILS O7 INDICATES PROPOSED TRACT NO. 98 -24a (OFFSITE EASEMENT) i LA COSTA A PE R. R. 7RApCS ' � z N► w A ON SITE BLVD. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT --NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY im TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD M. SECTION 4, T13S, R4W S.B. 1 a< 2 3 -22 -01 57142X16.DNC 57142.09 Q � m � OWh QOr ZWch Q Z QZ � � Q A= 7551'52" R= 22.00' L= 29.13' S.R11W EXH /B /T 18 jr 25' j Q V J S7454'59'W 9.00' S7454'59 "W - 25.00' - , T.P.O.B. INDICATES 10' WOE PUBLIC STORM DRAIN EA- 29MENT NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEWZOPMENT BOARD O1 INDICA TES PROPOSED TRACT NO 98 -240. LOT 48 PARK S/1 �M�M 1-- SUED /NSYLW BOUNDARY P.O.B. (T�P.) SANFORD N STR££T h :W O p h H Iv V� STORM DRA IN EASEM£NT�NORTH SAN D /EGO COUNTY SB TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECT /ON 4, T13S, R4W S.B.M. 2 aF 2 3 -22 -01 57142XIZDHV 57142.08 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: After recording mail to Attn: Real Estate Department North County Transit District 810 Mission Avenue Oceanside, California 92054 NO FEES DUE - FOR BENEFIT OF PUBLIC AGENCY Only) APN: 254 - 052 -14 (Space above this line for County Recorders Use EASEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND THE CITY OF ENCINITAS 1. Purpose and Intent THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement') is made and entered into as of the effective date of , 2001, (the "Effective Date ") by and between the North San Diego County Transit Development Board ( "NCTD "), and the City of Encinitas (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee" or "City "); and WHEREAS, NCTD owns a Right -of -Way for railroad purposes which it uses for public transit and freight, and WHEREAS. NCTD has policies regulating and governing the use of its Rights - of -Way, and WHEREAS, the Grantee has applied for the issuance of a Easement in accordance with such policies; and WHEREAS, NCTD has analyzed fully and considered the technical ability, financial condition, and legal qualifications of the Grantee; and WHEREAS, NCTD, after such consideration, analysis and deliberation has approved and found sufficient the technical, financial and legal qualifications of the Grantee; and WHEREAS, NCTD has considered and analyzed the plans of the Grantee for the location and installation of storm drain facilities and found the same to be adequate, feasible and in the public interest; and WHEREAS, the storm drain facilities have been located so as to minimize the chance that they will interfere with NCTD's future use of the property for public transit purposes; and WHEREAS, NCTD and the Grantee have agreed to be bound by the conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. Grant of Easement 2.1 There is hereby granted by NCTD to the Grantee, in perpetuity, the right to construct, use, operate, own and maintain the storm drain facilities (the "Facilities ") on NCTD's property described in Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" (the "Premises ") subject to applicable local, state and federal law and this Agreement. 2.2 Without reducing its power to adopt and enforce ordinances and regulations necessary to the health, safety and welfare of the public, NCTD hereby grants to Grantee authority to use certain public rights -of -way. 2.3 Grantee shall not increase or decrease or permit to be increased or decreased the ground elevations of the Premises existing at the time this Easement is executed. 3. Easement Not Exclusive This Easement conferred in Section 2 above is non - exclusive. The Grantee shall respect the rights and property of NCTD and other authorized users and owners of rights -of -way, easements, power poles, street light poles, vaults, and conduits. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, disputes between the Grantee and parties other than NCTD over the use of the easements, power poles, street light poles, vaults, conduits and other rights -of -way shall be submitted to NCTD for resolution. Grantee expressly agrees the Facilities shall not interfere with any and all uses of the surface property. 4. Relocation The Grantee shall, after receiving written notice from NCTD, in a time and manner mutually agreed upon, remove and relocate any City Facility(ies) constructed pursuant to this Easement Agreement that NCTD determines interferes with NCTD's z current or future use of its property for public transit purposes. Said City Facility(ies) may be relocated within NCTD's right -of -way if it is feasible to do so. 5. Amendment of Easement Agreement Nothing shall preclude the parties from amending this Agreement in accordance and consistent with the Policy. 6. Compensation From and after the Effective Date of this Agreement and throughout the full term of the Easement, the Grantee shall not be subject to an annual fee. 7. Compliance with Policies; Other Laws; Contracts; 5everability 7.1 The Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable terms, conditions and requirements of NCTD's policies regarding rights -of -way and other NCTD ordinances, rules and regulations, unless specifically amended herein, and to comply with all applicable laws and regulations of the federal, state, county, local governments and all administrative agencies thereof, including but not limited to judicial orders. 7.2 If any provision of this Agreement or any related agreement is held by any court or by any federal, state, or county agency of competent jurisdiction to be invalid as conflicting with any federal, state or county law, rule or regulation or contract now or hereafter in effect, or is held by such county or agency to be modified in any way in order to conform to the requirements of any such law, rules and regulations or contract, said provision shall be considered as a separate, distinct and independent part of this or such other Agreement, and such holding shall not affect the validity and enforceability of all other provisions hereof or thereof. In the event that such law, rules and regulations or contract, is subsequently repealed, rescinded, amended or otherwise changed, so that the provision hereof or thereof which had been held invalid or modified is no longer in conflict with the law, rules and regulations or contract then in effect, said provision shall thereupon return to full force and effect and shall thereafter be binding on the parties hereto, provided that NCTD shall give the Grantee sixty (60) days' written notice of such change before requiring compliance with said provision. 7.3 Grantee shall not use, generate, store, release or dispose of any hazardous material or substance on, under, about or within the Premises in violation of any law or regulation. Hazardous material or substance shall mean petroleum or any petroleum product, lead, asbestos, or any substance known by the State of California to cause cancer and /or reproductive toxicity, and /or any substance, chemical or waste that is described as hazardous, toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation. 3 8. indemnification Grantee agrees to protect, save, defend and hold harmless NCTD and its Board and each member of the Board, the San Diego Northern Railroad, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation ( "AMTRAK ") and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company ( "BNSF "), their officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, liabilities, expenses and damages of any nature, including attorneys' fees, for injury or death of any person, or damage to property, or interference of use of property, arising out of or in any way connected with the negligent acts, errors, or omissions or wilful misconduct by Grantee, Grantee's agents, officers, employees, subconsultants, or independent consultant's hired by Grantee. The only exception to Grantee's responsibility to protect, save, defend and hold harmless NCTD, is due to the sole negligence, wilful misconduct or active negligence of NCTD. This hold harmless agreement shall apply to all liability regardless of whether any insurance policies apply. Any policy limits shall not limit the amount of indemnification to be provided by Grantee. 9. Taxes Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to exempt the Grantee from any tax levy or assessment which is or may be hereafter lawfully imposed. Notice is hereby given pursuant to Revenue and Tax Code Article 107.6 that this Easement may create a property interest subject to property taxation and may subject Grantee to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest. 10. Condemnation If all or part of the Premises is acquired by eminent domain or purchase in lieu thereof, Grantee acknowledges that it will have no claim to any compensation awarded for the taking of the Premises or any portion thereof, including Grantee's interest in the Premises. Grantee also acknowledges that it will have no claim to any compensation paid as severance damages, or for loss of or damage to Grantee's improvements. 11. Relocation Assistance Waiver Grantee is hereby informed and acknowledges the following: 11.1 By entering into this Easement, Grantee may become entitled to receipt of ..relocation assistance benefits" ( "Relocation Benefits ") pursuant to the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. § 4601 et seq.) and /or the California Relocation Assistance law (Cal. Gov. Code § 7260 et seq.) (collectively, the "Relocation Statutes "), if NCTD makes use of the Premises in such a way as to 'displace' Grantee from the Premises. Pursuant to the Relocation Statutes, NCTD may become obligated to make relocation benefit payments to Grantee even when displacement of Grantee does not otherwise constitute a default of NCTD's obligations pursuant to this Easement. 4 11.2 Relocation Benefits payments to "displaced persons" may include payment of (i) the actual and reasonable expense of moving himself or herself and a family, business, or farm operation, including personal property, (ii) the actual cost of re- establishing a business or farm operation, but not to exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or (iii) payment in lieu of moving expenses of not less than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) or no more than Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000). 11.3 In consideration of NCTD's agreement to enter into this Easement, Grantee hereby waives any and all rights it may now have, or hereafter obtain, to Relocation Benefits arising out of its occupancy of the Premises pursuant to this Easement and releases NCTD from any liability for payment thereof. Grantee, further, shall in the future execute any further documentation of the release and waiver provided hereby as NCTD may reasonably require. 12. Vibration and Noise From Train Operations Grantee hereby recognizes and acknowledges that railroad tracks are located on or adjacent to the Premises, and that the operation of trains over the tracks does and will produce vibrations and noise levels which may be considered objectionable by the employees, agents, tenants, or invitees of the Grantee. With knowledge and understanding of these facts, Grantee by execution of this Agreement, accepts the Premises and agrees that no legal action or complaint of any kind whatsoever shall be instituted against NCTD by Grantee or on Grantee's behalf as result of vibrations and noise levels or as a result of the use of the railroad tracks in general. Grantee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless NCTD against any loss, damage, liability or expense which might occur as a result of such action being taken by Grantee, its employees, agents, tenants or invitees or anyone on Grantee's behalf. The term "NCTD" as used in this Section includes any railroad company operation on the tracks. 13. Construction 13.1 Any work performed or caused to be performed by Grantee on the Premises shall be performed (a) at Grantee's sole cost and expense; (b) in accordance with any and all applicable laws, rules and regulations (including NCTD's rules and regulations) and (c) in a manner that is satisfactory to NCTD and which meets or exceeds the then applicable standards of the industry for such work. Grantee shall submit work plans to NCTD for review and approval prior to commencement of any construction, reconstruction, installation, restoration, alteration, repair, replacement or removal (other than normal maintenance) (hereinafter, "Work ") on the Premises. Except in cases of emergency, Work must be carried out pursuant to work plans approved in writing by NCTD. In addition, Grantee shall provide NCTD and all holders of underground utility facilities located with the Premises with at least 7 calendar days written notice prior to commencement of any Work on the Premises pursuant to Section 5 15 below. In the event of an emergency, Grantee shall notify NCTD's representative personally or by telephone prior to commencing any Work. Upon completion of any Work, Grantee shall restore the NCTD property to its condition immediately preceding the commencement of the Work, unless otherwise requested by NCTD. 112 Non - interference. Grantee agrees that no Work by itself or its authorized agent will interfere with any railroad operations on the right -of -way. 13.3 Reimbursement of NCTD. Grantee shall reimburse NCTD, within 30 days of invoice, for all cost and expense incurred by NCTD (including a 7.2% administrative fee) in connection with any Work. These costs include, but are not limited to, consultants fees, mark out of railroad facilities, the expense of furnishing inspectors, security and flag protection as NCTD deems necessary, the installation and removal of false work beneath tracks, equipment rentals and restoration of NCTD right -of -way to the same condition as when Grantee entered thereon. 13.4 Flag Protection. Flag Protection shall be required when Grantee's operations on or adjacent to the railroad right -of -way present a danger to NCTD's rail facilities. NCTD in its sole discretion, shall determine the need for Flag Protection. 13.5 Crossing Right -of -Way. No vehicular crossing over NCTD's tracks shall be installed or used by Grantee without prior written permission of NCTD. 13.6 NCTD shall have the right to enter the Premises to post notices of non - responsibility. Grantee shall not permit any mechanics' or other liens to be filed against the Premises or against its interest herein by reason of labor and materials furnished to the Premises at Grantee's insistence or request. If any such lien is filed against the Premises, Grantee shall cause the lien to be discharged of record, either by payment of the claim or by posting and recording a bond pursuant to California Civil Code 3143, within twenty (20) days after demand by NCTD. Grantee shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend NCTD from and against any such lien. 13.7 The Grantee shall pay for any grade crossing protection and safety devices that NCTD is required to install as a result of this Easement pursuant to the safety rules, regulations and laws of the State of California, the California Public Utilities Commission or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction over railroad safety requirements. 13.8 If required by NCTD, Grantee shall, at its sole cost and expense, install barrier fencing, K -rail and /or landscaping to shield the railroad track area from public access and /or the improvements thereon from public view. NCTD shall have the right to review and approve fencing and /or landscaping plans prior to installation. Grantee shall not install or use any underground storage tanks on the Premises. G 13.9 Grantee shall provide NCTD with the results of all tests and studies conducted on NCTD property. 13.10 Notice of Construction. At least 7 days prior to the start of any work on the right -of -way, Grantee shall provide notice to NCTD's Real Estate Department (760) 966- 6504 (810 Mission Ave., Oceanside, CA 92054). 1111 Notice of Excavation. Grantee shall provide notice to DIG -ALERT at (800) 422 -4133 and to MCI Telecommunications Corporation at (888) 258 -0808 prior to any excavation in the Right -of -Way. 14. Maintenance and Repair Grantee shall, at its sole expense, maintain the Premises in a condition satisfactory to NCTD during the term of this Agreement including performance of all maintenance and clean -up of the Premises and any improvements thereon as necessary to keep both in good order and condition, in accordance with applicable governmental codes. Grantee shall be responsible for any citations issued by any agency having jurisdiction as a result of Grantee's failure to comply with local codes. 15. Service of Notice 15.1 Except as otherwise provided in Article 15, all notices required or permitted to be given to either party by the other party under any provisions of this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed served: a) When delivered by hand or by Federal Express or similar service to that party's address set forth below during normal business hours, or b) When mailed to any other person designated by that party in writing herein to receive such notice, via certified mail, return receipt requested. 16.2 Notice shall be given to the following: a) If to NCTD: North San Diego County Transit Development Board 610 Mission Avenue Oceanside, CA 92054 Attn: Real Estate Department b) If to Grantee: City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 Attn: Director of Engineering Services 17. Laws, Venues, and Attorneys' Fees This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of San Diego, State of California. In the event of any claim, legal action or proceeding between the parties arising under or concerning this License, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses as part of the judgment resulting therefrom. 18. Acknowledgment that Terms are Understood The Grantee acknowledges that it has read and fully understood the terms of both the agreement and the ordinance and agrees to be bound by the same. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have signed below, effective as of the Effective Date, by their duly authorized representatives. North San Diego County Transit Development Board 0 City of Encinitas M, Name: Na Title: C� `4lG�tiVtC�li Attest: Attest: 8 State of California ) County of San Diego ) On before me, DATE NAME, TITLE OF NOTARY personally appeared NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) personally known to me -OR- proved to me of the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledge to me that he /she /they executed the same in his/her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary ATTENTION NOTARY: Although 1herolorns THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: could prevent Title or Type of Document Number of Pages Date of Docu Signer(s) Other Than Named Above CLAIMED BY SIGNER INDIVIDUALS) CORPORATE OFFICER(S) PARTNER(S) ATTORNEY -IN -FACT TRUSTEE(S) SUBSCRIBING WITNESS GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING. NAME OF FERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION STORM EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, CONVEYED TO THE NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD IN QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 1992 AS DOCUMENT 1992 - 0802209 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE, AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF, BEING A 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, LYING 5.00 FEET EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF VULCAN AVENUE (SAID CENTERLINE LYING 25.00 WESTERLY OF BLOCK 27 AND BLOCK 34 OF NORTH LEUCADIA ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. MAP 524), WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SANFORD STREET, THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VULCAN AVENUE NORTH 15 005'01" WEST, 307.58 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 74 058'09" WEST, 25.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF VULCAN AVENUE AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 74 058'09" WEST, 9.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 22.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 75 051'52 ". A DISTANCE OF 29.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS. THE SIDELINES OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID VULCAN AVENUE. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. MICHAEL S. BUTCHER, PLS 6922 DATE SB60. /NC Bay Laurel Job No 5714208, Mae]b 13. 2001 1 of 1 D. 157142VegaWNCTD -1. wpd O 3 'x 9 O 20 �m V ~ 2 W� 0 �o CiPt EXHIBIT "B 0 LOT 47 46 PARK S%TE Q 1 LOT 48 PARK SYTE zt I ( CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -240 BAY LAUREL .SANFO4D STREET DA TA TABLE ® /ND /CA 7£S 10' WD£ PUBVC STORM DRAIN EASEMENT NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, SEE SHEET 2 FO4 DETA/LS. O1 INDICATES PROPOSED TRACT NO. 98 -240. LA COSTA A V£. R.R. TRACKS 5'LL�ESr f Z oNr S�ASC c� A G u Ve S /TE U 8L W. V/CWTY MAP (OFFS /T£ EASEMENT) NOT 70 SCALE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT--NORTY SAN DIEGO COUNTY S TRANS /T DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECT /ON 4, T13S, R4W S.B.M. 1 OF 2 3 -22 -01 57142X14.DHV 57142.08 EAR /NG RADIUS I LENGTH 1 N15V5'010W 307.58' 2 S7458'09 "W 25.00' 3 S74 58'09"W 9.00' 4 7551'52" 22.00' 29.13' ® /ND /CA 7£S 10' WD£ PUBVC STORM DRAIN EASEMENT NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, SEE SHEET 2 FO4 DETA/LS. O1 INDICATES PROPOSED TRACT NO. 98 -240. LA COSTA A V£. R.R. TRACKS 5'LL�ESr f Z oNr S�ASC c� A G u Ve S /TE U 8L W. V/CWTY MAP (OFFS /T£ EASEMENT) NOT 70 SCALE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT--NORTY SAN DIEGO COUNTY S TRANS /T DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECT /ON 4, T13S, R4W S.B.M. 1 OF 2 3 -22 -01 57142X14.DHV 57142.08 EXH IB I T �B S—F 7JDJV r LOT 47 ry, ✓, }?7YY PARK SITE �.- b 25' 25' A= 7551'52" R= 22.00' L= 29.1.3' 57458'09 "W f 9.00, S7458'09 "W 25.00' 1 ,�o h T.P.O.B. O 20 W o Q pm� OWh 3 m QOOI A Lot L • I Ck INDICA 10' WD£ PUBLIC STORM DRAIN �v EASEMENT 1VOR7H SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEWIORMENT BOARD O1 INDICA7FS PROPOSED 77?ACT NO. 98 -240. STORM DRAIN EASEMENT-�NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY s TRANS IT DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECT /ON A T13S, R4W S.B.M. 2 cF 2 J -22 -01 57142X75.DHG 57142.08 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 1 �L1��7:1�i��J(eftl1►MC�]�1 FROM: MASIH MAHER SUBJECT: BAY LAUREL TM 99 -240 PARK LANDSCAPING DATE: 06/01/01 CC: FILE The conditions of approval of the Bay Laurel subdivision TM 99 -240 as approved by Resolution 2000 -62 on September 13, 2000 require the applicant to provide for stormwater treatment through the future park site. The storm water mitigation requirement is necessary due to runoff generated by the Bay Laurel development. The developer shall provide landscape and irrigation within the proposed grassy swale and the detention basin in order to establish adequate ground cover, minimize erosion potential, and cleanse storm water runoff. All the erosion control and storm water treatment vegetation as shown on the approved plans, shall be installed and accepted by the Engineering Department prior to release of the performance bond. CE- Two L"C w e Taw. T 7� TSe CSR, San Diego Division LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Building Department: From Engineering Dept. 505 South Vulcan Ave. City Of Encinitas Date: Ca 92024 Reference: Attn: Duane Thomoson Chris Earl, Project Manager Mav 31. 2001 Bay Laurel Transmitted via: ❑ Mail ❑ Pick Up ❑ UPS Next Day / 2nd Day ® Messenger / Courier El No. of Copies Description 1 NCTD Storm Drain Easement 1 NCTD Storm Drain Easement Transmitted for your: ❑ Action ❑ File / Information ❑ Signature ® For Review and Comment Remarks: Cc: Chris Earl, Dan 0' Rurke, Mike EMML: cha,,1o@ nnar.c= ❑ Per Your Request El 5780 Fleet Street, Suite 300, Carlsbad, California 92008 * Phone: (760) 804-7700 * Fax(760)804 -7717 * S13 WO SB &O, INC. Land Planning Civil Engineering Land .Surrering TRANSMITTAL TO: CITY OF ENCINITAS DATE: 5/30/01 JOB NO: 57142.08 ATTN: Duane Thompson FROM: Mike Butcher RE: BAY LAUREL - NCTD Legal Description We are transmitting the following via hand delivery. ❑ For Your Review /Approval ❑ Reviewed as Noted ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested No of Copies No of Sheets Descn lion Date 1 4 NCTD Storm Easement 3/21/01 1 4 NCTD Storm Easement i 3/21/01 COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY: cc: w /encl Chirs Earl - Greystone Homes MSBArn DATE: 1615 Kearny Villa Road. Suite 2011 San Diego. CA 92123 9007 Arrow Rowe, Suite 120 ♦ Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 I'hnne (15X) 5611 -1 Id 1 I'ax (X5X) 560 -8 157 Phone (909) 948 -345(1 Fax (909) 948.2750 i I EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION STORM EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, CONVEYED TO THE NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD IN QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 1992 AS DOCUMENT 1992 - 0802209 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE, AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF, BEING A 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, LYING 5.00 FEET EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF VULCAN AVENUE (SAID CENTERLINE LYING 25.00 WESTERLY OF BLOCK 27 AND BLOCK 34 OF NORTH LEUCADIA ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. MAP 524), WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SANFORD STREET; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VULCAN AVENUE NORTH 15 005'01" WEST, 307.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 058'09" WEST, 25.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF VULCAN AVENUE AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 74 058'09" WEST, 9.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 22.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 75 051'52 ", A DISTANCE OF 29.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS. THE SIDELINES OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID VULCAN AVENUE. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. MICHAEL S. BUTCHER, PLS 6922 DATE SB80, INC. Bay Laum Job No 57142 08, March 13, 2001 1 of 1 D %5714211e9a1sWCTD -1 wpo EXH IB IT J*Bir 4 LOT 47 46 2 PARK 577E m s �mA �` �• Q r 3 1 E o = /N/TAS _ h s 8 240 EL a� SANFO4D STREET DATA TABLE ® 1ND1CAlES 10' MVE PUBLIC SMRV DRAIN EAS£HENT NO47H SAN DVEGO COUNTY 7RAN57T DEkR0FMENT BOARD. SEE &YEEr 2 F04 DETAILS O1 1A VCA TES PROPOSED TRACT NO. 98 -240. LA COSTA A1£ R.R. MAaCS 5 LL Sr r- x 2 SAN1 F E JAS hA S/TE &W. V/C/N/TY MAP (OFFS /M' EASEMENT) Nor AD sc&E STORM DRAIN EASEMENT -,NORTH SAN D /EGO COUNTY S TRANS IT DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECT /ON 4, T13S, R4W S.B.M. 1 of 2 & 0 3 -22 -01 57142a ADW 5714209 Q NG RAMS LENG7N 1 N15175'01 OW 307.58' 2 S7438'09 0W 2500' 3 S7438109'W 9.00 4 753152" 22. AD' 29.13 ® 1ND1CAlES 10' MVE PUBLIC SMRV DRAIN EAS£HENT NO47H SAN DVEGO COUNTY 7RAN57T DEkR0FMENT BOARD. SEE &YEEr 2 F04 DETAILS O1 1A VCA TES PROPOSED TRACT NO. 98 -240. LA COSTA A1£ R.R. MAaCS 5 LL Sr r- x 2 SAN1 F E JAS hA S/TE &W. V/C/N/TY MAP (OFFS /M' EASEMENT) Nor AD sc&E STORM DRAIN EASEMENT -,NORTH SAN D /EGO COUNTY S TRANS IT DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECT /ON 4, T13S, R4W S.B.M. 1 of 2 & 0 3 -22 -01 57142a ADW 5714209 EXH /B /T �B� 7,-rl'7'JOJV Y LOT 47 Ty S, r?-Jy, �y PARK S/7P ka 25' 25' A= 7531'52" R =2200' L= 29.13' h, S74S8'09 "W 9.00' S7438'09 "W 2.5 00' rr . 1 W °mom Z O z OZh 3 m W A OI 2 0 o Z �- INDICA 10' 1WDE PUBLIC ST" DRAIN EAMWENT NORW SAN DIEGO COUNTY 7RAN.9T DE"4£LDA DVT BOARD O1 INDVCA MS PROPOSED TRACT NO. 98 -240. STORM DRAIN EASEMENT-,NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY S13 TRANS IT DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECT /ON 4, T13S, R4W S.B.M. 2 CF 2 J -22 -07 57142"5DNC 57142.08 BAY LAUREL STORM EASEMENTS 557142.08 MSB 3/21/01 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E C/I 1.0' STORM EASEMENT ACCROSS NCTD R/W (VULCAN 13 +07.58) 102 1972029.431 6238566.459 C/L SANFORD & VULCAN N 15/05/01 W 307.58 206 1972326.417 6238486.418 13 +07.58 VULCAN S 74/58/09 W 25.00 207 1972319.934 6238462.273 PUB WEST Closure: S 05/03/20 E 0.004 -0.003 0.000 207 S 74/58/09 W 208 N 15/44/15 W 209 Arc center D= 7S/51/52 L= S 60/07/37 W 10 Closure: N 03/33/45 W 1972319.934 6238462.273 9.00 •1972317.600 6238453.581 22.00 1972338.775 6238447.614 29.13 C= 27.05 ST= 17.15 22.00 1972327.817 6238428.537 TERM 0.001 0.001 -0.000 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION STORM EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, CONVEYED TO THE NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD IN QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 1992 AS DOCUMENT 1992 - 0802209 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE, AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF, BEING A 10.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND, LYING 5.00 FEET EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF VULCAN AVENUE (SAID CENTERLINE LYING 25.00 WESTERLY OF BLOCK 27 AND BLOCK 34 OF NORTH LEUCADIA ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. MAP 524), WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SANFORD STREET; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID VULCAN AVENUE SOUTH 15 005'01" EAST, 50.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 054'59" WEST, 25.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF VULCAN AVENUE AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 74 054'59" WEST, 9.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 22.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 75 051'52 ", A DISTANCE OF 29.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS. THE SIDELINES OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID VULCAN AVENUE. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. ICHAEL S. BLJfCHER, PLS 6922 DATE 7.m SBBo. INC Bay Laurel Job No 57142.08. March 13, 2001 1 of 1 0 157142VegalsWCTD -2 O 3 L 2m �_ a� m DATA TABLE EXH IB I T "Bir LOT 47 PARK MW LOT 48 PARK 577E U.j CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -240 BAY LAUREL srnE-T - -Z i i i ® INDICATES 10' WE PUBLIC STORM DRAIN EASEMENT NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT OE,aO°MENT BOARD. SEE -WEFT 2 FOR DETAILS O1 INDICA7ES PROPOSED TRACT NO. 98 -240. (OFFS /T£ £ASEW)VT) LA COSTA A ICE R.R. Ay,.. $ TRACKS S'LLSt -c i SITE ,1FORO a 5 a AU�S i STORM ORA/N EASEMENTNNORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY S[B TRANS /T DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECTION 4, TIM, R4W S.B.M. 1 OF 2 IWI 3 -22 -01 57142Y16.DHG 5714209 AIREARNG RAMS LOWTH 1 S15MVINE 5&25' 2 57454 59 "W 2500' 3 S74 54 59"W 9.00' 4 755152" 22.00' 29.13 ® INDICATES 10' WE PUBLIC STORM DRAIN EASEMENT NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT OE,aO°MENT BOARD. SEE -WEFT 2 FOR DETAILS O1 INDICA7ES PROPOSED TRACT NO. 98 -240. (OFFS /T£ £ASEW)VT) LA COSTA A ICE R.R. Ay,.. $ TRACKS S'LLSt -c i SITE ,1FORO a 5 a AU�S i STORM ORA/N EASEMENTNNORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY S[B TRANS /T DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECTION 4, TIM, R4W S.B.M. 1 OF 2 IWI 3 -22 -01 57142Y16.DHG 5714209 EXH IB I T "B jr 0 �Q Jm� vZi N QO� WN � Z �hQ 2 =7551'52', R= 22.00' / L =29.13' ,5rrC7IJJY 7 ry. J, r?-7Y J DnJY " •/ P/ O1 1NDICA ms PROPOSED 7RACT NO. 98 -240. I 9, J V J S7454'59'W 9.00' S745459'W - 25 00' h \W 0 A h P.O.B. LOT 48 PARK -9) 1 SANFORD STREET STORM DRA IN EASEMENT-NORm SAN D /EGO COUNTY S TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD SECT /ON 4, T13S, R4W S.B.M. 2 aF 2 .�22 -01 57142Y17DW 5714208 BAY 1.61jifI STORM EASEMENTS 857142.08 MSB 3/21/01 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E C: /L 10' STORM EASEMENT ACCROSS NC:TD R/W (VULCAN 9+49.75) 102 1972029.431 62:38566.459 C/L SANFORD & VULCAN S 15/05/01 E 50.25 211 1971980.917 6238579.535 9 +49.75 VULCAN S 74/54/59 W 25.00 212 1971974.411 6238555.396 PUB S 74/54/59 W 9.00 213 1971972.069 6238546.706 N 15/44/15 W 22.00 214 Arc center 1971993.244 6238540.739 D= 75/51/52 L= 29.13 C= 27.05 ST= 17.15 S 60/07/37 W 22.00 215 19719822.286 6238521.662 TERM Closure: S 13/05/32 E 0.004 -0.004 0.001 FORM 1359 (4/75) I 1 1. ' \ CLTA SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE.i \ FORM NO. 1 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE SUBDIVISION: ENCINITAS TRACT 98-240 BAY LAUREL ORDER NO.: 1192193 -11 MAY 2 9 2001 FEE: $250.00 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, C9111YA 7:MYY: *1 THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND ANY CITY WITHIN WHICH SAID SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED IN A SUM NOT EXCEEDING $1,000.00. THAT, ACCORDING TO THOSE PUBLIC RECORDS WHICH, UNDER THE RECORDING LAWS, IMPART CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF MATTERS AFFECTING THE TITLE TO THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY SHOWN ON THE MAP OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED SUBDIVISION, THE ONLY PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN SAID LAND WHOSE SIGNATURES ARE NECESSARY, UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, ON THE CERTIFICATES CONSENTING TO THE RECORDATION OF SAID MAP AND OFFERING FOR DEDICATION ANY STREETS, ROADS, AVENUES AND OTHER EASEMENTS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION BY SAID MAP ARE: GREYSTONE HOMES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AS OWNER. LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS RECORDED APRIL 13, 2001 AS FILE NO'S 2001-0228788,2001-0228789,2001-0228790,2001-0228791 AND 2001- 0228792 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE SIGNATURE OF THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISION OF SECTION 66436, SUBSECTION (a) (3) (A) (i) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT REQUIRED BY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS RECORDED OCTOBER 22, 1937 IN BOOK 717, PAGE 75, MARCH 11, 1952 IN BOOK 4399, PAGE 521, MARCH 13, 1964 AS FILE NO. 47090, AND APRIL 6, 1964 AS FILE NO. 61989, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. FIRST TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK OF PASADENA, HOLDER OF EASEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 18, 1943 IN BOOK 1578, PAGE 57 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE MAP HEREINBEFORE REFERRED TO IS A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL A: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 9, IN BLOCK 21 AND THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 7 THROUGH I I IN BLOCK 22, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF HYGEIA AVENUE, SANFORD STREET AND JUNO AVENUE, AS VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, AND JANUARY 28, 1925, BY ORDERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CERTIFIED COPIES OF WHICH SAID ORDERS WERE RECORDED RESPECTIVELY DECEMBER 26, 1918 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 AND FEBRUARY 9, 1925 IN BOOK 1071, PAGE 122, BOTH OF DEEDS, ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF HYGEIA AVENUE WITH A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 480.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET (NOW HILLCREST DRIVE) AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 524, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO ROBERT LLOYD WESTREM, RECORDED JULY 23, 1936 IN BOOK 546, PAGE 82 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 74 °1730" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 651.00 FEET TO A POINT IN A LINE WHICH 1S PARALLEL WITH AND 320.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID MAP NO. 524; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 15 042'30" EAST 319.60 FEET TO A POINT IN A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 120.00 FEET NORTHERLY FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SANFORD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 524; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 74 °1730" EAST 130.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15 042'30" EAST 140.00 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 20.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SANFORD STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 7401730" EAST 700.00 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 170.00 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOTS 7 THROUGH 11 IN BLOCK 22 OF SAID MAP NO. 524; THENCE NORTH 15 042'30" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 639.50 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 33.10 FEET OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 74 017'30" WEST 170.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID HYGEIA AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 15 °42'30" EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 179.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARCELS OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS TO SULANA B SAE -ONGE, RONALD E. JOHNSON AND THOMAS D. HARDEBECK AND MARY MARTHA HARDEBECK BY DEEDS RECORDED MAY 4, 2001 AS FILE NOS. 2001- 0282072, 2001- 0282073, AND 2001 -0282074, RESPECTIVELY OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARCELS OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS TO G. WILLIAM HALL AND SALLY B. HALL, CO- TRUSTEES OF THE HALL FAMILY TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 15, 1999 AND WILLIAM MICHAEL LAFFERTY AND LISA STONE LAFFERTY, BY DEEDS RECORDED MAY 17, 2001 AS FILE NOS. 2001 -0316154 AND 2001- 0316155, RESPECTIVELY OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL B: ALL OF LOTS 7 TO 10 INCLUSIVE AND PORTION OF LOTS 6 AND 11 IN BLOCK 27, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF SANFORD STREET AND JUNO AVENUE, AND ALSO A PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 27, AS SAID STREET, AVENUE AND ALLEY WERE VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH SAID ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, DISTANT 20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 116.125 FEET NORTHWESTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 320 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND DISTANT EASTERLY THEREFROM 320 FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE 136.125 FEET TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 320 FEET ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: ALL OF LOTS 2 TO 15 INCLUSIVE AND A PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 16, IN BLOCK 27, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF SANFORD STREET AND JUNO AVENUE, AND ALSO A PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 27, AS SAID STREET, AVENUE AND ALLEY WERE VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH SAID ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO; ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, DISTANT 20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 480 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET, AS SAID STREET IS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 763, OF NORTH LEUCADIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND DISTANT EASTERLY THEREFROM, 320 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE, 380 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING FROM ALL OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY THE SOUTHEASTERLY 136.125 FEET THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHWESTERLY 6.50 FEET THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN DEED TO KENNETH L. VALLONE, TRUSTEE OR HIS SUCCESSORS IN TRUST UNDER THE VALLONE 1987 IRREVOCABLE TRUST UNDER AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 25, 1987, RECORDED MAY 10, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001- 0294688 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 21 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, AND OF THE NORTHWESTERLY 20 FEET OF SANFORD STREET AND OF THE NORTHEASTERLY 20 FEET OF JUNO AVENUE, VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE NOVEMBER 19, 1915 BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 320.00 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE WEST LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID NORTH LEUCADIA AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF, WITH A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 939.6 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; SAID POINT BEING ON A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 20 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 21 AND THE PROLONGATION THEREOF; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 A DISTANCE OF 140.0 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET 130.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, A DISTANCE OF 140.0 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20.0 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 21, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 130.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DATED: MAY 22, 2001 (REVISED MAY 24, 2001) FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ��ZIE INSpys ��' 4 :opPOR4 ROY P O CE - TITLE OFFICER DIRECT DIAL PHONE - 231 -4652 a FAX NO. 231 -4647 a MAY 18, 2001 ORDER NO. 1192193 -I1 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 411 IVY STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 P.O. BOX 808, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92112 (619) 23 &1776 GREYSTONE HOMES 5780 FLEET STREET #300 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 ATTN: KRISTINE ZORTMAN YOUR REF. BAY LAUREL OUR ORDER NO. 1 1921 93 -1 1 IN RESPONSE TO THE HEREIN REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, THIS COMPANY HEREBY REPORTS THAT IT IS PREPARED TO ISSUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, A POLICY OR POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE DESCRIBING THE LAND AND THE ESTATE OR INTEREST THEREIN HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, INSURING AGAINST LOSS WHICH MAY BE SUSTAINED BY REASON OF ANY DEFECT, LIEN OR ENCUMBRANCE NOT SHOWN OR REFERRED TO AS AN EXCEPTION HEREIN OR NOT EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORMS. THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FROM THE COVERAGE OF SAID POLICY OR POLICIES ARE SET FORTH HEREIN. COPIES OF THE POLICY FORMS SHOULD BE READ. THEY ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS REPORT. PLEASE READ THE EXCEPTIONS SHOWN OR REFERRED TO BELOW AND THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS REPORT CAREFULLY. THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS ARE MEANT TO PROVIDE YOU WITH NOTICE OF MATTERS WHICH ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY AND SHOULD BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THIS PRELIMINARY REPORT IS NOT A WRITTEN REPRESENTATION AS TO THE CONDITION OF TITLE AND MAY NOT LIST ALL LIENS, DEFECTS, AND ENCUMBRANCES AFFECTING TITLE TO THE LAND. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. DATED AS OF MAY 17, 2001 AT 7:30 A.M. THE FORM OF POLICY TITLE INSURANCI TO BE DETERMINED 14? c e�� - x 07 /-�L ROY P 0 NCE - TITLE OFFICER DIR T DIAL PHONE - 231 -4652 FAX NO. 231 -4647 TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: PAGE 1 57/42,14 A S1 1: y ORDER NO. 1192193 -11 GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATION THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: FEE THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2000 -2001, NOW PAYABLE, A LIEN NOT YET DELINQUENT. 2, SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. PARCEL NO. 899 - 126- 26 -19. ORIGINAL I ST INSTALLMENT $2,478.45 PAID ORIGINAL 2ND INSTALLMENT $2,478.45 PAID NOTE: NO DETERMINATION IS MADE AS TO THE ASSESSED TAX YEAR. SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. PARCEL NO. 889-126-26-28. ORIGINAL 1 ST INSTALLMENT $621.22 PAID ORIGINAL 2ND INSTALLMENT $621.22 PAID NOTE: NO DETERMINATION IS MADE AS TO THE ASSESSED TAX YEAR. 3. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTES OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES: THE REQUIREMENT THAT THIS COMPANY BE FURNISHED WITH ALL SUPPLEMENTAL TAX BILLS, IF ANY, FROM THE OWNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEFORE CLOSE OF ESCROW. 4. FORFEITURE OF TITLE IF INTOXICATING LIQUORS ARE MANUFACTURED, SOLD OR DISPOSED ON THE SAID LAND, AS PROVIDED BY VARIOUS DEEDS OF RECORD. PAGE 2 ORDER NO. 1192193 -11 S. THE EFFECT, IF ANY, OF LICENSE SURVEY MAP 341, PARCEL MAP NO. 11466 AND RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 16422 WHICH SET FORTH, OR PURPORT TO SET FORTH, CERTAIN DIMENSIONS AND BEARINGS OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. AFFECTS PARCELS B AND C. 6. ✓ AN EASEMENT FOR EITHER OR BOTH POLE LINES, UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO CONSOLIDATED GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 22, 1937 IN BOOK 717, PAGE 75 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT I 1 IN BLOCK 22, SAID POINT BEING 1.0 FEET NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF SAID FORMER HYGEIA AVENUE; THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTH 15 04630" EAST 292.2 FEET; THENCE NORTH 94013'30" EAST 200 FEET. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 7. AN EASEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF WATER PIPELINE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF FIRST TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK OF PASADENA, RECORDED OCTOBER 18, 1943 IN BOOK 1578, PAGE 57 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN THE NORTHERLY 7 FEET OF SAID LOTS 4 AND 9 IN BLOCK 21 HEREIN DESCRIBED. 8. AN EASEMENT FOR A LINE OF POLES AND WIRES FOR TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRICITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, RECORDED MARCH 11, 1952 AS FILE NO. 30568 IN BOOK 4399, PAGE 321 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN THE NORTHWESTERLY 6 FEET OF SAID PARCEL A. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 9. AN EASEMENT FOR GAS PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, RECORDED MARCH 13, 1964 AS FILE NO. 47090 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF LOTS 5 AND 6, IN BLOCK 21. SAID EASEMENT BEING WITHIN A 6 FOOT STRIP OF LAND, BEING 3 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTER LINE: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 21; THENCE NORTH 7401730" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF 110.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15 042'30" EAST 20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 20.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 21; THENCE NORTH 74 01730" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 227.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF PAGE ti r. a i- ORDER NO. 1192193 -11 BEGINNING OF SAID CENTER LINE OF RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, NORTH 15 042'30" WEST 262.00 FEET. 10. AN EASEMENT FOR A LINE OF POLES AND WIRES AND NECESSARY ANCHORAGE FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRICITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, RECORDED APRIL 6, 1964 AS FILE NO. 61989 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. H. THE EFFECT, IF ANY, OF RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NOS. 8867 AND 12592, WHICH SETS FORTH, OR PURPORTS TO SET FORTH, CERTAIN DIMENSIONS AND BEARINGS OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. AFFECTS PARCEL A. 12. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL SUM OF $(NONE SHOWN), AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS OR OBLIGATIONS SECURED THEREBY, RECORDED AUGUST 26, 1985 AS FILE NO. 85- 308287 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: JULY 18, 1985 TRUSTOR: ROBERT R. HALL AND ELISSE HALL, HUSBAND AND WIFE AS THEIR COMMUNITY PROPERTY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONE - THIRD INTEREST, FRED B. WESTON AND LITA E. WESTON, HUSBAND AND WIFE AS THEIR COMMUNITY PROPERTY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONE - THIRD INTEREST; STANLEY L. BAUER AND LAVERNE M. BAUER, HUSBAND AND WIFE AS THEIR COMMUNITY PROPERTY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED ONE -THIRD INTEREST TRUSTEE: UNION LAND TITLE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NOTE: THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN SAID DEED OF TRUST IS INCOMPLETE. AFFECTS PARCELS A. B AND C. 13. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE "SAN DIEGUITO REORGANIZATION ", AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 390249 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 14. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE "PATE ANNEXATION" TO THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 17, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 470543 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 4 -� AM F. lt/ 1 r ORDER NO. 1192193 -11 REFERENCE 1S MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 15. AN "AGREEMENT TO DISSOLVE BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT' DATED MARCH 3, 1998 EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN THOMAS UTMAN INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE WOOGLIN FAMILY TRUST, AND J. RANDOLPH POAG INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF PACER COMMUNITIES, INC., UPON THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH THEREIN, AS DISCLOSED BY A MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT, RECORDED APRIL 8, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998- 0198256 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCELS B AND C. 16. AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED APRIL 13, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001 - 0228788 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN SAID LAND. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 17. AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED APRIL 13, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001 - 0228789 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN SAID LAND. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT 1S SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 18. AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED APRIL 13, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001- 0228790 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN SAID LAND. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 19. AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED APRIL 13, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001- 0228791 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN SAID LAND. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. PAGE x ?I G $ / � J ORDER NO. 1192193 -11 x 20. AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED APRIL 13, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001- 0228792 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN SAID LAND. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 2000 -2001 TAX INFORMATION: CODE AREA: 19084 PARCEL NO.: 254 - 101 -24 -00 1 ST INSTALLMENT: $13,776.01 OPEN 2ND INSTALLMENT: $13,776.01 OPEN LAND VALUE: $2,555,694.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $ -0- EXEMPT: $-o- CODE AREA: PARCEL NO.: 1 ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPT: 19355 254 - 102 -51 -00 $5,235.29 OPEN $5,235.29 OPEN $976,566.00 $-o- $-o- CODE AREA: 19084 PARCEL NO.: 254- 052 -12 -00 1 ST INSTALLMENT: $2,729.07 OPEN 2ND INSTALLMENT: $2,729.07 OPEN LAND VALUE: $493,477.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $ -0- EXEMPT: $-o- CODE AREA: PARCEL NO.: 1 ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPT: 19084 254- 052 -13 -00 $1,690.53 OPEN $1,690.53 OPEN $285,696.00 $-o- $-o- CODE AREA: 19084 PARCEL NO.: 254 - 101 -07 -00 1 ST INSTALLMENT: $2,880.31 OPEN 2ND INSTALLMENT: $2,880.31 OPEN LAND VALUE: $510,000.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $10,200.00 EXEMPT: $ -0- PAGE 6 �Sl NF. kIr. i Addlbkb�', - LLY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAGE ORDER NO. 1192193 -11 A m F. N .c ORDER NO. 1192193-11 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 9, IN BLOCK 21 AND THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 7 THROUGH I I IN BLOCK 22, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF HYGEIA AVENUE, SANFORD STREET AND JUNO AVENUE, AS VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, AND JANUARY 28, 1925, BY ORDERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CERTIFIED COPIES OF WHICH SAID ORDERS WERE RECORDED RESPECTIVELY DECEMBER 26, 1918 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 AND FEBRUARY 9, 1925 IN BOOK 1071, PAGE 122, BOTH OF DEEDS, ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF HYGEIA AVENUE WITH A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 480.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET (NOW HILLCREST DRIVE) AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 524, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO ROBERT LLOYD WESTREM, RECORDED JULY 23, 1936 IN BOOK 546, PAGE 82 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 74 °17'30" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 651.00 FEET TO A POINT IN A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 320.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID MAP NO. 524; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 15 04730" EAST 319.60 FEET TO A POINT IN A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 120.00 FEET NORTHERLY FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SANFORD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 524; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 7401730" EAST 130.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 15 °42'30" EAST 140.00 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 20.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SANFORD STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 7401T30" EAST 700.00 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 170.00 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOTS 7 THROUGH 11 IN BLOCK 22 OF SAID MAP NO. 524; THENCE NORTH 15 °42'30" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 639.50 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 33.10 FEET OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 7411 T30" WEST 170.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID HYGEIA AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 15 °42'30" EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 179.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARCELS OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS TO SULANA B SAE -ONGE, RONALD E. JOHNSON AND THOMAS D. HARDEBECK AND MARY MARTHA HARDEBECK BY DEEDS RECORDED MAY 4, 2001 AS FILE NOS. 2001- 0282072, 2001- 0282073, AND 2001 - 0282074, RESPECTIVELY OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARCELS OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS TO G. WILLIAM HALL AND SALLY B. HALL, CO- TRUSTEES OF THE HALL FAMILY TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 15, 1999 AND WILLIAM MICHAEL LAFFERTY AND LISA STONE LAFFERTY, BY DEEDS RECORDED MAY 17, 2001 AS FILE NOS. 2001- 0316154 AND 2001- 0316155, RESPECTIVELY OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL B: PAGE 8 `as1 AMeq r a -1- �= L� ORDER NO. 1192193 -11 ALL OF LOTS 7 TO 10 INCLUSIVE AND PORTION OF LOTS 6 AND 11 IN BLOCK 27, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF SANFORD STREET AND JUNO AVENUE, AND ALSO A PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 27, AS SAID STREET, AVENUE AND ALLEY WERE VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH SAID ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, DISTANT 20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 116.125 FEET NORTHWESTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 320 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND DISTANT EASTERLY THEREFROM 320 FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE 136.125 FEET TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 320 FEET ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: ALL OF LOTS 2 TO 15 INCLUSIVE AND A PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 16, IN BLOCK 27, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF SANFORD STREET AND JUNO AVENUE, AND ALSO A PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 27, AS SAID STREET, AVENUE AND ALLEY WERE VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH SAID ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO; ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, DISTANT 20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 480 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET, AS SAID STREET IS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 763, OF NORTH LEUCADIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND DISTANT EASTERLY THEREFROM, 320 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE, 380 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20 FEET AT RIGHT PAGE 9 ORDER NO. 1192193-11 ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING FROM ALL OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY THE SOUTHEASTERLY 136.125 FEET THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHWESTERLY 6.50 FEET THEREOF ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN DEED TO KENNETH L. VALLONE, TRUSTEE OR HIS SUCCESSORS IN TRUST UNDER THE VALLONE 1987 IRREVOCABLE TRUST UNDER AGREEMENT DATED .TUNE 25, 1987, RECORDED MAY 10, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001- 0294688 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL D: THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 21 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, AND OF THE NORTHWESTERLY 20 FEET OF SANFORD STREET AND OF THE NORTHEASTERLY 20 FEET OF JUNO AVENUE, VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE NOVEMBER 19, 1915 BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 320.00 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE WEST LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID NORTH LEUCADIA AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF, WITH A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 939.6 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; SAID POINT BEING ON A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 20 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 21 AND THE PROLONGATION THEREOF; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 A DISTANCE OF 140.0 FEET, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET 130.0 FEET, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, A DISTANCE OF 140.0 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20.0 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 21, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 130.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PAGE 10 SENT BY: FATCO SUB MAPPING; 411 IVY ST., SAN DIEGO, CA 82101 Fax To: DUANE THOMPSON 619 231 4647; MAY -29 -01 9:10AM; PAGE 117 From: MOON RASH FOR ROY PROVENCE Fam 760 -633 -2818 Pages: Phone: 760 - 633 -2783 Date: 05128/01 Re: BAY LAUREL MAP (GREYSTONE) CC: 0 Urgent X For Revlew 0 Please Conwnent ❑ Please R*My ❑ Please Recycle DUANE, HERE ARE COPIES OF THE FIRST PAGES OF THE DOCUMENTS I THINK YOU WERE LOOKING FOR. IF YOU COULD PLEASE CALL ME WITH YOUR ADDRESS THERE, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO SEND YOU A HARD COPY OF EACH. LET ME KNOW. (619) 2314652. B t reQards, viii♦ i � = �J, MOON RASH FOR -• PROVENCE SENT BY: FATCO SUB MAPPING; Re CORDfiD REQUr>Sr OP First American Title SUOIN`/'31oN 09/ - When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk I City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue tas, CA 92024 1) AssessorsPareel No. 254- 052 -12,13 254 -101 -7,24 254- 102 -51 619 231 4647; MAY -29 -01 9:11A11; PAGE 2/7 DOC # z001- 0337197 MAY 24. 2001 4:25 PM OFFICIAL REty808 SAN DLEM MIM RMER'B OFFICE (96ORY J. 8MI1N, CMIM RECOW FEES: 122.00 SPACE ABOVE] mot matm COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: (Tentative Map) ProjectNo.- Case 1198- 240TM1DR/CDP .j«.a. A- Greystone Homes ( "OWNER" hereinafter) are the owners of real property which is commonly known as 12 acres at the northeast comer of Vulcan Avenue and Sanford Street ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof B. In consideration of the approval of Case # 98 -240 TM/DR/CDP by the City of Encinitas ("CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to comply withthe terms and conditions of the permit as follows: See Exhibit B, Resolution No. 2000 -62 (Tentative Map and Coastal Development Permit approval) datod September 13, 2000, xW Resolution No. PC2000.63 (Design Review Permit) dated October 5, 2000, which is attached hereto end made a pert hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a PvWadd/Oysyn wJwv.nwLDOT OQ12AI Order. MR- 00000000011 Description: 2001.337197 Page 1 039 Comment: SENT BY: FATCO SUB MAPPING; RECORDED REQUEST or First Amariean Title 9000WL910M w,rMO DEPT. Recording Requested By: City Planner 619 231 4647; MAY -29 -01 9:11AM; PAGE 3/7 DOC # -2001 - 0337190 15439 MAY 24. 2001 4:25 Pt''1 When Recorded Mail To: } } City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas C-4 92024 ) SPACE ABC OFFICIAL REM SM DMW WIM KM'S OFFICE GSM J. 9QTH, 111M Rte FEES: 26.00 COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY FUTURE PARK, TRAFFIC, AND FLOOD CONTROL FEES Assc& -, &s Parcel Nrmrber. 254-052 -12,13 Project No. IM 98 -240 254 -101 -9,24 254- 102 -51 A. GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATION ("OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows: See Attachment "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof- B. In consideration of Final Map approval for the above referenced project by the City of E=initas ("CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment "B" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covemw shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbraneers, successors, heirs, pemnal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a Hen upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and oppormnity to respond, CITY may add to the Property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. if either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the- Prevailing perry shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the other party. F- Faihne of the OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. COV99 -240 L Order: MR- 00000000011 Description: 2001.337188 Page 1 of 7 Comment. SENT BY: FATCO SUB MAPPING; 619 231 4647; S 1 RECORDED REQUEST or 15506 FirstAmerican Tfile SUDOMSION MAPIING uevr, i rI i Recording Requested by: ) City Engineer J When Recorded Mail To: } City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas. CA 92024 ) MAY -29 -01 9:11AM; PAGE 4/7 DOC # 2001- 0337199 MAY 24P 2001 4:25 Pi" E SPACE A OFFICIAL RECOROB SW DIEM C9JR RtMKR'S OFFICE GRf00R4 J. smm- COUNTY FEU R F0: 23.00 COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY WLIVHR OF PROTEST TO ASSESSMENTS Asseaaor's Parcel Numbers :254- 052 -12,13 254- 101 -7,24 254- 101-51 Project No. TM 98-240 1 �&llV -. - i\►wus, 'C. A. 193, ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TM 98-240 ("PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows: See Attachment "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of TM 98 -240 OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: No protest shall be made by the owners to any proceedings for the installation or acquisition of street improvements, including undergrounding of utility lines, under any special assessment 1911 or the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, or any other applicable state or local law, and whether processed by the City of Encinitas or any other governmental entity having jurisdiction in the matter and for the purposes of determining property owners support for same. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under 9 this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax hill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. COV98- 240.DOC Order- MR- 00000000011 Description: 2001.337199 Page 1 of 6 Comment: SENT BY: FATCO SUB MAPPING; I� z W RECORDED REQUEST OF FirstAmrerican Tale svaolvislowI PWG )el 619 231 4647; MAY -29 -01 9:12AM; PAGE 5/7 15512 Doc # z001- 0337200 Recording Requested By: ) MAY 24. 2001 4:25 City of Encinitas ) ) When Recorded Mail To ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92024 ) SPACE (FFIMk RE= W DIMW COO PER'S OFFICE IRTM J. NTH, CUNIY REM FEES: 29.00 COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CRY HARMLESS FOR GRADINGIDRAINAGE Assessor's Parcel No_ 254 052 -12 &13 Project No.:TM 98 -240 254 -101 -7,24 254 -10251 ( "OWNER" hereinafter) Is the owner of real property which is commonly known as ("PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of TM 98-240 by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment 8 which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and Inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrencers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties_ D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY try way of Order. MR- 0000000006 Description: 200f.337200 Page f of 6 Comment: PM SENT BY: FATCO SUB MAPPING; 619 231 4647; MAY -29 -01 9:i2AM; PAGE 6/7 RECORDED REQU65 r OF First American Title DOC # A01- 0337201 wauihs7or runn�ra Derr- Recording Requested by: MAY 24, 2001 4:25 PM City Engineer 15 5 2 Q OFFICIAL RECORDS When Recorded Mail To: MR DIEGO COUNTY URDER'S OFFICE GEM J. 9Q1H, CMITY REft7iDFR City Clerk FEES: 44.00 City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92D24 A E ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S rb ly COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: C;V.lj PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel No. 254 - 052 -12,13 Project No.: TM 98 -240 254 -101 -7,24 W.O. No.: OT751 254 - 102 -51 A. GREYSTONE HOMES, INC, A DELAWARE CORPORATION (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which Is commonly known as TM 98" W ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of private improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required private Improvements- In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter) , SUBDMDER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Exhibit B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C- This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. SUBDIVIDER agrees that SUBDIVIDER's dales and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond. CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. if either party Is required to incur coats to enforce the provisions of this Covenant the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursemdnt of all costs, Including reasonable attorneys fees, from the other party. Order: MR- 00000000011 Description: 2001.337201 Page 1 of 13 Comment: SENT BY: FATCO SUB MAPPING; • RECORDED REQUEST OF plrst Anwican Me d: atwucoN�nrnlwowT. Recording Requested by: City Engineer r, When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 619 231 4647; MAY -29 -01 9:13AM; PAGE 7/7 DOC #.2001-0337202 15533 MAY 24, 2003- 4:25 PM OFFICIAL SM DIEGO O711FI1Y REfX1i9ER1 OFFICE GEM J. BiI1N, CWy RECRU FEES: 44.00 . lnllll'IIlIIIIN SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel No.254- 052 -12.13 Project No.: TM 88 -240 254 -101 -7,24 264- 102 -51 W.O- No.: 6775 -1 (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which Is commonly known as TM 98- 240 ("PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described 85 1`0110 YS: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B- The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construcfion of public improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required public improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City Order. MR- 00000000091 Description: 2001.337202 Page 1 of 13 Comment: gyMRY;, , 7 �2001,R L. 2: 20PM GREYSTONE HOMES NO.131 P.2i7 oia 230 1029; MAY-7-01 12:0015m; PAGE 1 First American 6t AYIAJ . C Title Insurance 411 IVY STREET • SAN DIEGO, CAUFORMA 92101 FAX TRANRUMAL DATE : May 7, 2001 To: : GRhYSTONE HOMES, INC. FAx No :(760) 804 -7716 Arm : Chris Earl �utsli 7ei��a�/ Compa y tie f mom : LYNN GRAHAM TOTAL K 40 n oP PAG$$: Qv>W W Thu Pqc) RE ; Eermw No.; 98- 5343LGB Property Addmu: VACANT L AND, APN 254052 -12„ 2S"52 -13, ENCINITAS, CA SUWECT.- Conformed copy of recorded Gram Deed IMPORTANT NOIM: Should my of these prpete require as ORIGINAL SIGNATURF, Pierre trice a XEROX COPY BSEORE SIGNING. We MITI not meoq* an orl8inrl Sigrture on FAX piper. TUnk you for your caopwition In thk matter. THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED, AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL, IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT. OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAQE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE READ THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. IF YOU 00 NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES AS INDICATED OR HAVE PROBLEMS IN RECEIVING THIS FAX PLEASE CONTACT THE ABOVE SENDER AT: (619) 231.4887. OUR RETURN FAX NO. IS: (619) 238 -1029. SENT BYMRY:,,7 200tpe 2 :20PM GREYSTONE HOMES 238 1029; r ' RECORDING REQUESTED BY: WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Greystone Homes, Inc. Attention: Mr. Michael Levesque 5780 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 AN zsz+ - OSZ •,-2 NO. 131 MAY•7 -81 12:09PM; Ovt 40vh' P.3 /7 PAGE 2 TI£ W 1fiDK OF MS DOC WRT WIS REM ON VAY 04. 2001 MW ILW 2001-0Q$ w A DIELO IA11iY Em's TM TILE: 431 PM zrs4 -osz -�3 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECCRDBR'5 USE GRANT DEED In accordance with Section 11932 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, Grantor has declared the amount of transfer tax which is due by a separate statement which is not being recorded with this Grant Deed. FAR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, RECEIPT OF WHICH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, THOMAS L. UTMAN, Trustee of The Wooglin Family Trust dated August 8, 1996, hereby grants to GREYSTONE HOMES, INC., a Delaware corporation, the real property in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, described in Exhibit 1 attached hereto and made a part hereof. Dated: March 2, 2001. '�1HOMAS L , Trustee of The Wooglin Family Trust dated August 8, 1996 SENT Wy 'Y. 7�001.AG 2:20PM GREYSTONE HOMES NO.131 P.4i7 oty 238 1029; MAY -7 -01 12;09PM; PAGE 3 EXHIBIT 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.- PARCEL 1: All of Lots 7 to 10 inclusive and portion of Lots 6 and 11 in Block 27, together with a portion of Sanford Street and Junc Avenue, and also a portion of the alley in said Block 27, as said Street, Avenue and Alley were vacated and closed to public use on November 19, 1915, by order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego, a certified copy of which said order was recorded December 26, 1916 in Book 500, Page 343 of Deeds, in the office of the Recorder of said San Diego County; all being in North Leucadia in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 524, .filed in the Office of the Recorder of said San Diego County, April 6, 1888, described as a whole as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southeasterly prolongation of the Westerly line of said Block 27, distant 20 feet from the Southwesterly corner thereof; thence Northwesterly along said prolongation and along said Westerly line of said Block 27 to its Point of Intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 116.125 feet Northwesterly from the Southerly line of said Block 27; thence Northeasterly 320 feet along said parallel line to its Point of intersection with a line drawn parallel with the Westerly line of said Block 27 and distant Easterly therefrom, 320 feet geasuted at right angles; thence Southeasterly along said last described parallel line, 136,125 feet to its Point of Intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 20 feet at right angles Southeasterly from the Southerly line of said Block 27 and the Northeasterly prolongation of said Southerly line of said Block 27; thence Southwesterly 320 feet along the last described parallel line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: All of Lots 2 to 15 inclusive and a portion of Lots 1 and 16 in Block 27, together with a portion of Sanford Street and Juno Avenue, and also a portion of the alley in said Block 27, as said Street, Avenue and Alley were vacated and closed to public use on November 19, 1915 by order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego, a certified copy of which said order was recorded December 26, 1916 in Book 500, Page 343 of Deeds, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, all being in North Leucadia, in the County of San Diego, state of California, according to May thereof No. 524, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on April 6, 1888, described as a whole as follows: MAY. 7 2001.R� 2 21PM GREYSTONE HOMES 1029; MAY -7 -01 12;09PM;'131 PPAGE 416 SENT BY . ,,;, cut Beginning at a point on the Southeasterly prolongation of the Westerly line of said Block 27, distant 20 feet from the Southwesterly corner thereof; thence Northwesterly along said prolongation and along said Westerly line of said Block 27 to its Point,of Intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 480 feet Southeasterly from the center line of Monterey Street, as said street is Shown on Map No. 763 of North Leucadia, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County; thence Northeasterly along said parallel line to its Point of Intersection with a line drawn parallel with the Westerly line of said Block 27 and distant Easterly therefrom, 320 feet, measured at right angles; thence Southeasterly along said last described parallel line, 380 feet, more or less, to its Point of Intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 20 feet at right angles Southeasterly from the Southerly line of said Block 27 and the Northeasterly prolongation of said Southerly line of said Block 27; thence Southwesterly along the last described parallel line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING FROM all of the above described property the Southeasterly 136.125 feet thereof. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Northwesterly 6.50 feet thereof. SENT BYMRY:. Z;20OLRG.. 2 :21PM 6REYSTONE HOMES 238 1029; Document No. Date Recorded NO. 131 P.6 /7 MAY -7 ^1 12:10PM; PAGE 516 STATEMENT OF TAY DUE AND REQUEST T}IAT TAY DECLARATION NOT BE MADE A BART OF TEE p"MLNENT RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER (pursuant to Section 11932 R&T Code) To: Registrar - Recorder County of San Diego Request is hereby made in accordance with the provisions of the Documentary Transfer Tax Act that the amount of tax due not be shown on the original document which names: THOMAS L. UTMAN, Trustee of The Wooglin Fanily Trust__44.ted AAgggt A4_1296 (as Grantor) and GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. (as Grantee) Property described in the accompanying document is located in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California. The amount of tax due on the accompanying document is S Computed on full value of property conveyed, or Computed on full value less liens and encumbrances remain q at ime of sale. Signature of Declarant or Agent F rm Name SENT WAYS 7_200LpC� 4:21PM GREYSTONE HOMES 23S 1029; • r CALIFORNIA TILL- PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA 83: COUNTY OF 0 rr. m On this S*% day of , 2001, before re, Fe under.- gned notary public, Personally appeared _ NAME(6) OF SIONFR(S) , ❑ personally known to me -OR- E'proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(.-} whose name (et isEars. subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he,$819 }iey executed the same in histbavo4heir authorized capacity�j , and that by his /*er signatures. on the instrument the person(.s. or the entity(."") upon behalf of which the personCS4- acted, executed the instrument. WITNE my and and of icial seal. eanTmd OF *MARY HAPCYAV P. aaaa..aa �-. - doh -104=7 IONAL SzOTIOx NO. 131 P. 7/7 MAY -7 -M+ 12:10PM; PAGE 6/6 -- OPTIONAL SECTION- - CAPACrTY CLAINSD BY siGxER Though ■tatute does not require the notary to fill is the data baler, doting 00 may prove invaluable to persona relying on the document. ® INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OPFIC$R(s) SIGXZR IR Rf.PRE9ZNTIWG.- NAME OF PYRSOn(S) OR QNIITY(IFS) THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED To THE TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT.- DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT; Though the data requeated here in not required by law. �1 it could prevent fraudulent reottachmaat of this foe. NUMBER OF PAGES: y' e 'ILI is P,\RZAL \576 \16369053\0rant Oaad.doc DATE OF DOCUMENT.— hAF15i, i.,1001 OTMM SIGNXR(S) THAN NAKED ABOVE. TITLES) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED 11 OENtRAAL ❑ ATTORNEY -IN -FACT C TRUSTES(S) ❑ GUARDIAN /coNSBRVATOR ❑ OTFMR: SIGXZR IR Rf.PRE9ZNTIWG.- NAME OF PYRSOn(S) OR QNIITY(IFS) THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED To THE TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT.- DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT; Though the data requeated here in not required by law. �1 it could prevent fraudulent reottachmaat of this foe. NUMBER OF PAGES: y' e 'ILI is P,\RZAL \576 \16369053\0rant Oaad.doc DATE OF DOCUMENT.— hAF15i, i.,1001 OTMM SIGNXR(S) THAN NAKED ABOVE. Recording Requested B, City of Encinitas When Recorded Mail to: 1 City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92024 ) FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY )SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY Assessor's Parcel No. 254 - 101 -05 DRAINAGE EASEMENT Project No.: TM 98 -240 W.O. No.: 6775G Kumud H . Patel a widow and Nilesh H. Patel, hereinafter designated Grantors do hereby grant, bargain, convey and release unto the City of Encinitas, herein designated Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement and right -of- way upon, through, under, over and across the hereinafter described real property for the installation, construction, maintenance, repair, replacement, reconstruction and inspection of an enclosed flood DRAINAGE channel and all structures incidental thereto, and for the flowage of any waters in, over, upon or through said channel, together with the perpetual right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and any other obstruction interfering with the use of said easement and right -of -way by the Grantee, its successors or assigns. To have and to hold said easement and right -of- way unto itself and unto its successors and assigns forever together with the right to convey said easement, or any portion of said easement, to other public agencies. Grantor to retain right to approve all changes to flood drainage channel and to designate material and design used for flood channel cover. City to notify Grantor in writing 30 days prior to any changes or repairs. Grantors to notify City of any objection to proposed changes or repairs ensuing within 15 days of receipt of notice. The real property referred to herein above and made subject to said easement and right -of -way by this grant is situated in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, and is particularly described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY THIS REFERENCE, The Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall be responsible for operating, maintaining, and keeping in good repair the above described works of improvement. Drainage easement 11 -20 -00 bak 1 The Grantor, his succe- rs and assigns, reserves the rig. o enclose in a manner approved by the Grantee, its successors and assigns, any portion of an unenclosed flood drainage channel provided such enclosure is constructed or installed by a licensed contractor in accordance with plans and specifications approved by and to the satisfaction of the Grantee, its successors and assigns. In granting its approval, the Grantee, its successors and assigns, may impose reasonable conditions including but not limited to, the filing by the contractor or Grantor of an adequate form of security, as approved by the City Engineer, to guarantee completion of the work. There is reserved to the Grantor, his successors and assigns, the right and privilege to use the above described land of the Grantor at any time, in any manner and for any purpose not inconsistent with the full use and enjoyment by the Grantee, its successors and assigns, of the rights and privileges herein granted. Dated this \0 day of Grantor: 1KV-rv^u- Signature of Owners to be notarized. Attach the appropriate acknowledgments. 2000. H. I certify on behalf of the City Council of the City of Encinitas, pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution No. 94 -107 of said Council adopted on November 9, 1994 that the City of Encinitas accepts and consents to the making of the foregoing DRAINAGE EASEMENT Dedication and consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date: 4114t9l Drainage easement 11 -20 -00 bak 2 By: )JI.J 'Auk Alan D. Archibald Director of Engineering Services City of Encinitas EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION STORM DRAIN EASEMENT THE WESTERLY 10.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHERLY 10.00 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11 AND 12 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED RECORDED JULY 29, 1999 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1999 - 0523786 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. 15. HAEL S. BUTCRtR. PLS 6922 DATE $B8O INC 57 1 of 1 0157l42MegalAStcrm -Patel SO No. 57117 07, Marta 27, 7(101 EXH IB I T MB 0 HALL I Scq� 1 I R SHEET 2 e B O N I (P J R. 0. S. -� 16422 I II I I LA COSTA 1 A VE. 1 II EW z II DR. CRY SN I I R.R. A 5 CKS t` TR LL�ESr a S /T£ sp ° Err N. C. T. D. RAIL ROAD + �, a E j pSON 3v," �puCUS ® /ND /CATFS pTY Ole £NCmms STCRM DRAIN EA -gWCNT SEE SJYEET 2 FCP DETAILS CAD /A O INDICATES PRA°OSED TRACT BLVD. NO. 9e -240. V /C /N /TY MAP OFFS /T£ EASEMENT (PAYEE) NOT TO SCALE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT S B CITY OF ENC/N/TAS p " NORTH LEUCAD /A, MAP NO. 514 1 OF 2 & Q 3 -26 -01 57142X18.DKV 57142 0) EXH /B /T ioB so ® 1NDIC47ES CITY OF ENCINITAS STORM DRAIN EASEMENT SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAILS. O 1NDIC4TES PROPOSED TR4CT NO. 98-240. OFFS /T£ £AS£A/£NT (PAT£L) I� i PA TEL APN 254 - 101 -05 POR7JO1Y OF J- 0 7B .,; 4, 9 & YO BL OCK 2Y AMP 524 JYORrl -I Zi5UrAl DJA �L I STORM DRAIN EASEMENT s B CITY OF ENC /LAMAS p " NORTH L£UCAD /A, MAP NO. 524 2 Of-2 CX O 779 -nf 57142X19.DPW 57142.07 SB &o SB &O, INC. Land Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveying TRANSMITTAL TO: CITY OF ENCINITAS ATTN: Duane Thompson FROM: Mike Butcher RE: BAY LAUREL - Permission to Grade Letters We are transmitting the following via mail. DATE: . 4/27/01 JO&NO; 57142.07' For Your Review /Approval ❑ Reviewed as Noted For Your Information ❑ As Requested No of Copies No of Sheets Description Date 1 6 Good, Lafferty, Hall, Johnson, Sae -Onge and Patel Permission to Grade Letters 101001 =5 ZVI &] RECEIVED BY: DATE: cc: MSB: km Corporate Office: 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suite 201 ♦ San Diego. CA 92123 ♦ Phone (858) 560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 9007 Arrow Route. Suite 120 ♦ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ♦ Phone (909) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue. Suite 201 1 Temecula, CA 92590 * Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909)693 -3320 APR 0 9 2001 March 27, 2001 CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 RE: Bay Laurel City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -240 Letter of Permission for Grading Dear Sirs: We are the owners, or have interest in, the property adjacent to the above referenced project. We have reviewed the grading plans and landscape and irrigation plans, and are satisfied with the improvements shown thereon. We hereby grant Greystone Homes, Inc. the right to grade upon and across said property, in accordance with City of Encinitas Drawing No. 6775 -I. Sincerely, B, :/".d r.rte Good APN: 254- 053 -17, 254- 111 -30 Site Address: 145 Sanford Street, Encinitas CA 92024 -1503 Mailing Address: PO Box 40, Bella Vista CA 96008 -0040 (MSB):jmf D :M142U.TRS\PERMISSI0N.wpd SB &O Job No. 57142.07 March 27, 2001 CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 RE: Bay Laurel City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -240 Letter of Permission for Grading Dear Sirs: We are the owners, or have interest in, the property adjacent to the above referenced project. We have reviewed the grading plans and landscape and irrigation plans, and are satisfied with the improvements shown thereon. We hereby grant Greystone Homes, Inc. the right to grade upon and across said property, in accordance with City of Encinitas Drawing No. 6775 -G. Sincerely, Ln William M. and Lisa S. Lifferty APN: 254 - 102 -26 Site Address: 1456 Sanford Lane, Encinitas CA 92024 -1501 Mailing Address: 1456 Sanford Lane, Encinitas CA 92024 -1501 (MSB):ama D:157142V.TRSTERMISS10N.wpd SB &O Job No. 57142.09 March 27, 2001 CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 RE: Bay Laurel City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -240 Letter of Permission for Grading Dear Sirs: We are the owners, or have interest in, the property adjacent to the above referenced project. We have reviewed the grading plans and landscape and irrigation plans, and are satisfied with the improvements shown thereon. We hereby grant Greystone Homes, Inc. the right to grade upon and across said property, in accordance with City of Encinitas Drawing No. 6775 -G. Sin 'e ly, 24 / 7- B Hall APN: 254- 102 -22 Site Address: 1462 Sanford Lane, Encinitas CA 92024 -1501 Mailing Address: 1462 Sanford Lane, Encinitas CA 92024 -1501 (MSB):ama DA57142LLTM%PERMISSI0N.,gW SB &O Job No. 57142.09 March 9, 2001 CITY OF ENCMTAS Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 RE: Bay Laurel City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -240 Letter of Permission for Grading Dear Sirs: We are the owners, or have interest in, the property adjacent to the above referenced project. We have reviewed the grading plans and landscape and irrigation plans, and are satisfied with the improvements shown thereon. We hereby grant Greystone Homes, Inc. the right to grade upon and across said property, in accordance with City of Encinitas Drawing No. 6775 -G. Rincerely Ronald E. Johnson APN: 254- 101 -21 Site Address: 263 Hillcrest Drive, Encinitas CA 92024 -1561 Mailing Address: 900 South Coast Highway 101, Encinitas CA 92024 -4405 (MSB):jmf D157142\ TR5TERMISStoN.wpd SB &O Job No. 57142.07 March 9, 2001 CITY OF ENCMTAS Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 RE: Bay Laurel City of Encinitas Tract No. 95 -240 Letter of Permission for Grading Dear Sirs: We are the owners, or have interest in, the property adjacent to the above referenced project. We have reviewed the grading plans and landscape and irrigation plans, and are satisfied with the improvements shown thereon. We hereby grant Greystone Homes, Inc. the right to grade upon and across said property, in accordance with City of Encinitas Drawing No. 6775 -G. Sincerely, Sulana B. Sae -Onge APN: 254- 101 -26 Site Address: 273 Hillcrest Drive, Encinitas CA 92024 -1562 Mailing Address: PO Box 212, Del Mar CA 92014 -0212 (MSB):jmf DA57142TTRS\PERMISSION.wpd SB &O Job No. 57142.07 March 27, 2001 CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 RE: Bay Laurel City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -240 Letter of Permission for Grading Dear Sirs: We are the owners, or have interest in, the property adjacent to the above referenced project. We have reviewed the grading plans and landscape and irrigation plans, and are satisfied with the improvements shown thereon. We hereby grant Greystone Homes, Inc. the right to grade upon and across said property, in accordance with City of Encinitas Drawing No. 6775 -G. Sincerely, By: k\)Yr",j a 1-\ Kumud H. Patel APN: 254- 101 -05 Site Address: 227 Hillcrest Drive, Encinitas CA 92024 -1526 Mailing Address: 1340 Hygeia Avenue, Encinitas CA 92024 -1621 (MSB):ama DA5714UTRSTERMISS10N.wN SB &O Job No. 57142.07 SB &0.. SB &0, INC. TO: Land Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveying TRANSMITTAL CITY OF ENCINITAS DATE: 4/23/01 JOB NO: 57142.05 ATTN: Dwayne Thompson FROM: Mike Butcher (�U� vU . -APR. 2 j 2 RE: BAY LAUREL Certificate of Compliance ; We are transmitting the following via hand delivery. CIT FENCINRpS ❑ For Your Review /Approval ❑ Reviewed as Noted ❑ For Your Information As Requested No. of Copies No of Sheets Description Date 1 1 12 1 Certificate of Compliance Revised Legal (Sanford) - Lafferty 4/20/01 COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY: DATE: cc: MSB:km Corporate Office: 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suite 201♦ San Diego, CA 92123 Phone (859) 560 -1.141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 120 ♦ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ♦ Phone (909) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 ♦ Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909)693 -3320 When Recorded Mail To And Recording Requested By City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 IN COMPLIANCE: ,._ ORIGIA OF THIS DOCUMENT WAS RECORDED ON AFR 20, 2001 DEMENT N1 KR 2001- 0244639 GREGORY J. SMITH, C UTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COLFTY R'ECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 9:11 AM SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOT APPROVED FOR DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (Section 66499.35 of the Government Code) The Director of Community Development of the City of Encinitas has determined that the parcels of real property described below have been divided or have resulted from a division in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and with provisions of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code. The parcels described herein may be sold, leased, or financed without further compliance with the Subdivision Map Act or any local ordinance enacted pursuant to the Act. Development of the parcel may require issuance of a permit or permits, or other grant or grants of approval. Section 3.I.I.A. I of the North 101 Corridor Specific Plan states that the provisions of Title 30 of the Municipal Code applicable to the R8 zone shall be applicable to the N -R8 zone. Section 30.16.010 of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code specifies a minimum lot size of 5,400 square feet, and minimum lot dimensions of 90 feet in depth and 60 feet in width. This Certificate of Compliance applies to three parcels in compliance with the required standards pertaining to minimum lot size and dimensions. Owner/ Applicant: Greystone Homes, Sulana B. Sae -Onge, and Ronald E. Johnson Description: (See Exhibit "A ", attached) Plat Map: (See Exhibit`B ", attached) NOTE: The descriptions in Exhibit "A" and Plats in Exhibit "B ", attached, have been provided by the owner of the property, and neither the City of Encinitas nor any of its officers or employees assume any responsibilityfor the accuracy of said descriptionsor Plats. This Certificate of Compliance shall in no way affect the requirements of any City, County, State, Federal or local agency that regulates developmentof real property. Case No: 00 -292 BA (see DCD 2001 -026 on file in the Community Development Department) Assessor Parcel Numbers: 254-101-21,-24, & -26 Date: April 10, 20611 / BY: Bi ee man, City Planner C D /KK/f: \00- 292cc. doc wNwIff 7filIM LEGAL DESCRIPTION GREYSTONE TO JOHNSON THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 22 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF 524 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDED APRIL 6, 1888 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE THAT LAND DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO RONALD E. JOHNSON PER DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 16, 1999 AS F/P 1999 -497169; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 15 005'01" EAST 15.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 °14'01" WEST 87.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85 008'38" WEST 11.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 001'01" WEST 48.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71014'34" WEST 2.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID JOHNSON LAND; THENCE ALONG SAID PROLONGATION NORTH 14 045'59" WEST 9.54 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID JOHNSON LAND; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 74 058'09" EAST 149.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. SMO INC Fadwry Zl, 2001 1 of 1 D157i<2� EGA S%T SJOHg NSN OH EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION GREYSTONE TO SAE -ONGE THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 22 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF 524 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDED APRIL 6, 1888, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF HYGEIA AS VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 4, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12782, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY JUNE 23,1983; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE AND THE CENTERLINE OF SAID HYGEIA AS VACATED AND CLOSED, THEREOF SOUTH 15 003'15" EAST 12.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 014'01" WEST 14.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64 048'33" WEST 22.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 014'01" WEST 109.39 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG SAID PROLONGATION NORTH 15 °05'01" WEST 15.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 74 058'09" EAST 145.82 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. HAEL S. BUTCH , PLS 6922 DATE sea°, INC 1 of 1 B� Joe N 57142 05, FSbuxy 21, 2001 0 �5714T ECA S5 AANS- W-ONGE EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 IN BLOCK 21 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF MONTEREY STREET, AS VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915 AND JANUARY 28, 1925, BY ORDERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CERTIFIED COPIES OF WHICH SAID ORDERS WERE RECORDED RESPECTIVELY DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS AND FEBRUARY 9, 1925 IN BOOK 1071, PAGE 122 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 20 OF SAID NORTH LEUCADIA, DISTANT 20.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 20; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20.00 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES NORTHWESTERLY FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 20, AND THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF, AND CONTINUING PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 21, THE AFORESAID PARALLEL LINE BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF MONTEREY STREET, AS SAID STREET IS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 763 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, FOR A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 684.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO ROBERT H. PRATT, RECORDED IN BOOK 800, PAGE 275 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ABOVE MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE BEING ALSO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO BERNICE HEDLUND AND BERTHA E. PAGE, RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1959 IN BOOK 7498, PAGE 241 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID HEDLUND LAND BEING PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SB90, INC aft Jo No 57142 05 , FeM 21.2001 1 of 5 D- .Z7142LLE 3 SAID BLOCK 21, 460.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 480.00 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO GUY E. THRAILKILL AND WIFE, RECORDED IN BOOK 1504, PAGE 82 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID THRAILKILL'S LAND, BEING A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 684.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF BLOCKS 20 AND 21 OF SAID NORTH LEUCADIA, 460.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHWESTERLY 398.67 FEET. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 4 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 15 °05'01" EAST THEREOF 15.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 °14'01" WEST 87.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85 008'38" WEST 11.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 °14'01" WEST 48.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71014'34" WEST 2.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID JOHNSON LAND; THENCE ALONG SAID PROLONGATION NORTH 14 045'59" WEST 9.54 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID JOHNSON LAND; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 74 058'09" EAST 149.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. ICHAEL PLS 6922 DATE JOENoI 5714205. FONu -q 21. 2001 2 of 5 o157u2LLECa�L�W W3CIIeIli v.1m LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL B PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12782, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY JUNE 23,1983. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 22 OF NORTH LEUCADIA ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF 524 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAID COUNTY RECORDED APRIL 6, 1888, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF HYGEIA AVENUE AS VACATED AND CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC USE ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 4, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL MAP 12782; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID HYGEIA AS VACATED AND CLOSED, SOUTH 15 003'15" EAST 12.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 014'01" WEST 14.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64 048'33" WEST 22.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 014'01" WEST 109.34 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG SAID PROLONGATION NORTH 15 005'01" WEST 15.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 74 058'09" EAST 145.82 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. MICHAEL S. BO'CHER, PLS 6922 ' ' DATE JWo1571<205, FeDr 21 2001 3 of 5 0.Z7„TLEG4L�W EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL C LOT 4 IN BLOCK 22 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDED APRIL 6, 1888, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF HYGEIA AVENUE AS VACATED AND CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC USE ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 4, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 4 AND THAT PORTION OF HYGEIA AVENUE ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 4, LYING NORTHERLY OF A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 480.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE CENTERLINE OF MONTEREY STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP 524. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM: THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 22 OF NORTH LEUCADIA ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF 524 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAID COUNTY RECORDED APRIL 6, 1888, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF HYGEIA AVENUE AS VACATED AND CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC USE ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 4, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12782, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY JUNE 23,1983.; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF AND ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID HYGEIA AS VACATED AND CLOSED, SOUTH 15003'15" EAST 12.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 014'01" WEST 14.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64 048'33" WEST 22.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 °14'01" WEST 197.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85 008'38" WEST 11.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 °14'01" WEST 48.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71 014'34" WEST 2.72 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LAND DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO RONALD E. JOHNSON PER DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 16, 1999 AS F/P 1999 - 497169 OFFICIAL RECORDS; sego. INC 4 of 5 o s7,<xeGAM w JaE No. 57112.05, FWrury 21. X101 THENCE ALONG SAID PROLONGATION NORTH 14 045'59" WEST 9.54 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID JOHNSON LAND; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID JOHNSON LAND, NORTH 74 058'09" EAST 149.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2, NORTH 74 058'09" EAST 145.82 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. MICHAEL S. BUTCH5�ft, PLS 6922 " DATE ; No 5714205, Feoruwy 21 2001 5 of 5 DZ714ZLEGA �� • � � �, tip"'' N p,N 1_ r a ye• i6,� 1 N_ � •f r • M a; 1 i � ' 6 L - 6 S � 3 /,FAG 10 z dF Af- A Io L\ � R' Z D, G 01/) -�t4 - . . , i 6 . Iz .L Z 9 -- -- R9 99'S 6857 DOC 1 2000- 0251540 0[� PLEASE COMPLETE THIS INFORMATION. MAY 15. 2000 4:10 PH RECORDING REQUESTED BY: OFFICIAL SAN DIEGO COONTY REBDER'S OFFICE >r (SREM J. SMITH, MWTY RECORDER FEES: 22A AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: e,5& 2S/3 �ffYD�'d �t 2000- 0251340 (Please fill in doctu=t nde(s) no this lint) pale DEC 2 1 2000 THIS PAGE ADDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACE FOR RECORDING INFORMATION (Additional recording fee applies) 9N5 RzF.9 925 (lrrfar FYp_11_nnnndRl9 I)acrrinfinn- 9Mn 9517dn Pnna 1 of R rnmmanf IPP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 lI 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OO . PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM & WALDRON LLP Scott R. Carpenter, Esq., Bar No. 144259 Suite 1300 - East Tower 2603 Main Street Irvine, California 92614 -6228 n (949) 851 -9400 crtin n.sw «ac Attorneys for Defendants JUL 1999 GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. and gY. ARLAM? THOMAS UTMAN, Trustee of the Wooglin Family Trust SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA ._ COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO KENNETH L. VALLONE, Trustee, or his successors in trust, under the VALLONE 1987 IRREVOCABLE TRUST, under agreement dated June 25, 1987, Plaintiff, VS. GREYSTONE HOMES, INC.; a Delaware corporation; THOMAS L. UTMAN, Trustee of the Wooglin Family trust dated August 8, 1996, etc., at al., Defendants. Case No. N077747 JUDGE: Lisa Guy- Schall DEPT: 28 JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO C.C.Y. SECTION 996 OFFER Trial Date: 6/25/99 � The parties having compromised this claim pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 996, the court therefore enters the following judgment in this matter: 91 M Q ou i� rd u a 1. The court orders that the plaintiff is the owner of a nonexclusive prescriptive easement for the purposes of maintaining the existing cinder block curb and portions of the existing driveway jUDGMEyr PURSUANT TO C.C.P. SECTION 998 OFFEI Order EXP- 11- 00004815 Descriofion 2000.251340 Paoe 2 of 6 Comment JER 6859 1 which encroach on the property currently owned by defendants 2 Greystone Homes, Inc. and Thomas L. ❑tman as Trustee of the wooglin 3 Family Trust, for ingress and egress of motor vehicles and 4 pedestrians over such existing driveway, and for such use as 5 reasonably related to the maintenance and use of the cinder block 6 wall and the driveway described above. The legal description of the 7 portions of the defendants' land which are subject to the 8 prescriptive easements are more particularly described in the legal 9 description attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated 10 herein as if set forth in its entirety. The maximum extent of 12 encroachment of the above- referenced improvements onto to the 12 defendants' land, therefore the maximum extent of the easement, is 13 the.southeasterly face of the existing cinder block wall which 14 approximately parallels the vested boundary lines separating the 15 property of the plaintiff and the property of the defendants, which 16 easement area is more particularly described in the attached Exhibit 17 "A. 18 19 2. Defendants shall pay jointly and severally to the 20 plaintiff the sum of $2,500. 21 22 3. Except "as described in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the 23 plaintiff shall take nothing by way of his complaint. 24 25 26 27 28 - 2 - 31f0(.'YRJ; iCA SVAAT :'0 C.C.P. �CC71O 598 QFPEF 'der: EXP -11- 00004815 Description: 2000.251340 Page 3 of 6 Comment JER r I IT IS SO ORDERED. Z 3 DATED: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 i8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6860 1iaia (juy— Schall e of a Superior court LISA GUY-SCKALL QU KKT n{msemT TO C.C.P. SR,-. .ION 99B �rR n,A., CVO 44 nnnnnalS )nnn )F11,10 pan. d of n+ 1970 6861 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THOSE PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 21 AND 27, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF SUNO STREET AND A PORTION OF THE ALLEY WITHIN SAID BLOCK 27 AS SAID STREET AND ALLEY WERE VACATED ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915 BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500 AT PAGE 343 OF DEEDS ALL IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THERROP NO 524 RECORDED APRIL 6, 1886 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER GF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 5£GINNING AT A POINT ON T?Tr SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 DISTANT 486.50 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE CENT ERL-iNE OF HILLCREST DRIVE (FORMERLY MONTEREY ST,ZEET) AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP 524; SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THAT LAEM DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO ROBERT R. HALL ET. AL. PER DOCUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 21, 1964 AS FILE /PAGE NO. 191847 OF OFFICIAL RECORDSi THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE THEREOF AND ITS NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION, NORTH 74 058'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 494.47 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THAT LAND AS DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO K.E. EBRIGHT ET.AL. PER DOCUMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 5, 1953 IN BOOK 4738 AT PAGE 241 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 15 007'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 0.22 FEET; TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY FACE OF A 6 INCH MORE OR LESS HIGH BLOCK WALL; THENCE ALONG SAID FACE SOUTH 73 °40'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3.01 FEET; TFM;CE SOUTH 75 000102" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 012'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74926134" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 046'39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 19.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 022149" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.15 FEET; jjE:NcE SOUTH 74°S91Z1" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 19.79 F=T; THENCE SOUTH 74938'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 5.95 F£=; THENCE SOUTH 74 °54'24" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 042'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74944'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 °20'41" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 048107" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.05 FEET; THENCE SOU'T'H 74 020'10" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 °08109" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 040'10" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75023'C5" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 °33'14" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.91 FEET; FXHM 3 ili nniarr FXP_11_nnnn4R1F OacrrinHnn 9nnn 991 440 Pane .S of A (:nmmenl JFR 6862 THENCE SOUTH 75 005'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.11 FEET;. THENCE SOUTH 74 032'20" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 059'111 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 049'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 000'22" WEST, A DISTANCE.OF 29.68 F'gET; THENCE SOUTH 74 033'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 7S °14'54" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 644'34" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTF: 75 017'43" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 059'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 014'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.46 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 75.34'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.99 FE-T; THENCE SOUTH 74 448'31' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 °13'10" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75004135" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 °32'73" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 010'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75007119" WEST, 'A DISTANCE OF 19 -86 FEET; MONCE SOUTH 7S °01'38• WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.77 FEET; TRICE SOUTH 74052'59" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 21.67 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OP SAID BLOCK 27; THENCE NORTH 15 °04115` WEST ALONG SAID, A DISTANCE OF 0.81 FEET TO THE ?OIA'T OF BEGINNING L'CNTAT_NING 420 SQUARE FEET MORE, OR LESS. N (— F` s ..LJ- im 5211 fM faega^^QQ15'sucaemialu l�hve u d cm ;oet of tlts�Ay(naf?�>�ellia�ci' -= �vr s, "' .. Gerk of the inand*# By 7 nrrYpr FXP -11- 00004815 nescrintion 2000 251340 Paoe 6 of 6 Comment JFP TOTPL P.03 l Mirr A s 4539 not # 2000 -019a2 6 Recording pqueated Ry= APR 16. 2001) 11 =27 AM when Retarded Return To: FICA {fm NARCY ADA" W DIEGO CMR 4C3W*S UMQ Q lIrII.lRA C'AC RORTR sER lI u m J. 911IIL Inin um 9111 OAMALC AVt (Q5: 12.0.1 OlAisIIDRTIIt G ,Ili1- I'��"t""'II' farodleen. ' �II Naroun AR,TfJImY[ or D= or TRUST r: aI^' W Mao CO1MfY. CUfd1O114 eraatR', NRnESIOe: 7emle+nl �tlrtN' uroe q... RIYYSIOR'/ Lam RD: MUM •� tFor crena[n reetn RATIONSCILEDIi�RpBFIAIIITY EERVICRSSCVRPORATION allntene[fcl�1 O v' +� nder that A[ SNITN dated AND AEIOA"' J' SRIw, WSFAND aAND RIrR DEC /1d�/ WIT Inatramenc to FIRS enCI.M. NO.R 1199-0451156 LInRSANTDIECO ,VUFT YCO(ded as CAli,im IIA. EN<31NEE Arsesrer'e /Tat ID Ro: 161'171 -15 CA 91117 ero,iercy Address: 4511 NDUNT HICHPINE PLACE, SAN DIEW. of T.4r with the the °odue and co heceoeei dueethereon Of iche incere to, and .Flaw ghee of Trust, the money accrued or to accrue under said Deed of Trust. In witaeee whereof this tastrom,nt is executed. FIRST FRANKLIN rf RANCIAL CCRMRATION .,. Cn Ii /1A/9e IDATEI KeiA RRAMLACR /ASSISTANt v. . . ✓.M �ItMY4VY IN [(fL4 Mt t.•tu4N 10 l3 Please return to LAFCO 0 MS A216 VA a� j r l2- 86 470543 ; , SAN DIFGO COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION 'T A nex -tion" To the Leucadia v W-t r DiaTryt - Ref. No. DA86 -45 RS OCT 17 FN 2 52 V !Iy 7 Pursuant to Government Code sections 57200 and 5720 "., this Certificate 1s No FEE +;hereby issued. The ra ^a of each city anal /or district involved in this change of ercanizauon/ r^_c•rganizatior, all located within San Ct_co county. ar._ the type of change ,f organization ordered for eec` suc`. city and /or district is as °_ollol'ea'- =it._ 0- District Annexation Leucadia County Water District DEC 2 1 2. ENGINFa Oiur �: her Cfied copy of the resolution. / ^rdirarce orderinr, this chance o`- orxni- zaicr /r- :orgzr.ization without an elects- or the resclution!ord trance c,r.- �rc rn oc:ier for tl is change of orca nization,freorganization a` -ter cor.- ftrnetlor. 3r the voters is atcache9 ce:eto and t rc:ecerce inch: aorata °_ _Creln. ;, lecal �escr fi ction and cap o`. the t"Indories of tte a�o•:e -ci =ec char. ^,� c` crc�anizaticn /reorSanizatior. is iacl_Srd fir, said reseresolution. The terry and conditions, if ar.y, of the chance o= orga:azation.'reoccar.lza- zior. are indicated on the ettacrind fore' l hereby ce:t:`_v that I have exan:nod the ato:•o -clted resolu«io,,'ord : rar.ce fpr a change of or ,ar.izatior. /reo-,nriza�ior, and cave .curd t docu. ^ *- tO to in corpllacce with the Conr.133ie ^'2 resolution a_o2roC1nc said chacce of nrgarizat,:- /rccrgarizatior.. I furtner r._rti` -y that 41) rcaclutiors agreeinc to axed a recot:ated cx- ctarge of property tax re-:er.ues for this jurlyd,ctioral ct3rge. ..deptac by the local a= envies included in the r.e:otiatier.s. have beer. subrltttd to this office, c- (2) a feaster property tax exchange aoreerect pertinent to this jtrisd:cu'OnZl chance is on file. rc - - -- �s.. i _±[� October 13y 1986 .— "r1 •c Go n. w t l 1 h1 i Lv W MELRw r � _ w -A 1845 (a% 236-2015 • san dkflo ftxrnatl corrKrikss5on loth � W.e y . room 452 san dbogm a 92" TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF INDEBTEDNESS CERTIFICATE RE: C�,�nlrn Subject: "PATE ANNEXATION" TO THE WATER DTSTRICT {DA86 -45) LEUCADIA COUNTY are required by the Local 1 Certain terms and conditions to be fulfilled prior to h4rn-11 gency Formation Commission above -named change of ocgani zat ion. s.... oe:e..r the completion of tie s." a Aide rrn S,k.. Crrry aaW el I N.Y. Roehl Administrative -- ' —jyace I�C1° do 'rereby certify [hat the terms and cond is wrs listed below have been fully =et• " mcls• om.ml be modified to conform to r. csm..%14:, 1. The boundaries shall hereto. Exhibit A attached 2 iniD[ia[iontof of rquM C ;...<.1 v $4, 823[ aso at lumps sumd payable[ upon x,10 preliminary proceedings for tiannexation ctfor real and r,M ~�• Waterp District. or 11 Y, ua.. personal ofeLeucadiaGCountyexisting JcrH f.e,:U 4tw[2n Era•" C. ry F. MJn _ ••ry bun "1 I•'+.a'v Co will the of feet ed property be taxed for any exist ---g bonded indebtedness o: contractual coligatinn7 There is a 0.00541 �,es 1 �o If yes, specify. bonded indebtedness within the District. per 10 Messe nation f Erc+lm Oele, a 1/ 1 SLgnar�ce cr w uma w. IlrT�..+ September .J, 1886 pate { ,i CO CN — � I .y qei♦ �pQ$ 1947 V` - RESOLUTION 90. 968 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LEUCADIA COU%T'f WATER DISTRICT ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (PATE ANNEXATION) TO LE'1CADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT F WHEREAS. the Board of Directors of Leucadia Cout.ty Water District the WLocal San Agency Formation California, Commissionb of eSan Diego oCounty for application nexation of territory known as Pate Annexation to the District; and WHEREAS, the Territory is uninhabited and the owner p t he terms and land within the territory gave his written consent to such annexation upon t conditions hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the Local Agency rt,rmation Commission of San Diego County adopted annexation without approving ndticee and hearing 9 anddwithout tan election, subject annexation order to the terms and cc.tditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS GF LCWD DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: Sectioi 1. The Territory described y hereaJxhibit a'nnexedhta LCWDfn•oou nc by this re eree made a part hereof. terms and conditions set forth in Section 2 below. S"tion 2_ the following terat and conattium are imposed upon such anrexation: Territory property owner shall make payment to LCWD the sum of an 1823a.00. asf 'a r therf right of yusee of pall the existing r o ingproperty real a d personal, of the District. Sect'.ao 3. The District has received the sum of S 1.823.00 and the foregoing terms and conditions have, therefore, been satisfied. Board of Directors allowi g vote adfa County Water PASSLO AND ADOPTED by the District this 28th day of August I( , b Y the AYES: Directors Humphreys, McDaniel. hnsted, Hanson and Saltzmn ROES: Rone ABSENT: gone ABSTAIN: none •_915 €, YumphfPyS.•t ent ATTEST Joar G ?'s ^_lnart, Secretzry- 9;.•�t 7e' )f (SEAU a 00 7 ell :w7 County 4;ater District DA 86 -45 "pate Annexation" to t4'S Acadia 11 and a Portion of adjacent in the County of San D'u� °' 7 thru filed in the All that Portion 22 at north Le toa map thereof no. 514 Igoe, block ding April 6, streets in actor Diego County, state of CalifoI off fce of San boundaries° County Record [hes following described lying within lot 1; eeginnina at the southeast corner of ntherly prolongation sCt Qe Ceasa shown Of shown on Thence along the so line of Sanford 1 said lot to the center 524' line to the center line of map r.o. and the boundary Iona `-aid center no. Sit on December Thence westerly on said map as it existed 2 as shown g era Alenue, Water District nning7 ofg the Leuc adla County 1985 and the true Pain line and the ter ter line 12, " west,659.50 feet Tore along said bound;zY 30 records northerly north 15" 13529, 3. Thence pVenue, arcel map RO' of said tog[he southerly line of p or less of said county: 17D DD feet; Thence north 74" 17' 30' east, 30" parallel to said boundary of 4• to the cent ^_r 1•." o` 42' east p 5 Thence south 15° Water District. the Leucad is Coy` -ntY t he of said Sanford Stree; said center line to he ti ue p 6. Thence westerly alona beainnina. SC:no 8/12/86 LAFCO ADO•av�a W �n� loin Ay�M' FUMI�M rpmmn•,an o� yn D"•6D AJG 4 ER4131T • �• pag" l of 1 Du .. J iii /r 1 /B !J LOT LOT i O L! t 1849 ES ENOINEE RIND -9C iE NCE LOT f I /Or- BLOCK Z� cOTs I EX1S T/A(G L. C.WO. 3011AWRK - toss I -- COTL �,�arva�ve. AUG 4 IW l J !z -co °' / IC -- WIAL ,� k7n543 ._ 1850 cLR ;rlcalg or.seeae? rev_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA j ss- COUNTY OF SAN OIEQ) 1. JOAN R. OEISELHART. SecretarY of the poard of Directors of Leucadia County Water District. DO HERESY CERTIFT that the above and forego inO is a full, true and correct coD.Y of Resolution 4 868 of said Board, and that the same has mat been amended or revealed. �Uj p1 Date: 9-'1986— 2 ! � y .dater ^istr i.t 5t reUry of Le•:cadia County and os tie Soard of Directors !hereof ^1 Co 4 .12ase return to ,Ayco ® Ms A216 i 761 &"t7 DIEGO COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY POgMATICN CONJIISSIO, CERTIFICK. -E OP COMPLETION 86 390244 1 aicuntN:O w � OFitCIEG EVtAI L CF SAX CIELO C'4'11 Y. U.1 IM SEP -5 )X 6 00 LvEVA L.LYI E CpUNiVaECOROCN "San Dieguito Reorganization" HO FEE Ref . NI-72n .fLq Iu G `WAM1.5 .N Yment Cr C Sectlans 57200 -2, pursoant to Govern thin Certificate is beret} `rti ?r;zsced by the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Conarissiop of San Diego County, California. The netts of sack CLtY and /or •llstrict Involved in this change of he N aatien /re•!rg anlz et ion, all located within San Diegc County, and the of chango of organization for each such city and /or district is as �C 2 1 follcds. C E C1Ly or District Incorporation ENGINE City of Encinitas Annexation CITY City of Carlsbad Detacb.Mant City of Carlsbad Subsidiary District San Dieguito Water District Subsidiary District Encinitas Sanitary District Encinitas Fire Protection District Subsidiary District !`.tcinitas Fire Protection District Annexation nn t er Cegtrga93jo. 83 MR ..9 l ff 1 A cent ie cop! t t e reaclot Loa�ocdinanec c_ acme this change o or- genizztion /reor9anisat ion without an olect_on. or the resolution/ordl- rfte? confirrat4o'a+nbyrthe for cterai ism attached heretozatdobyrreferer.Cet Lnn corporeted herain. A lal. deaCription and map of the bcundarles Of the abet'= -cited •`large eg of organization /teortanizatian is ircl�ded in said r�nolution. •Ihe tarPJ' er.d conditions, if any, of the change of o:ganizatiun/ceorganl- zat5on are indicated on the attached form. I bereoy certify that I have exa¢,ired the abo :a- tit ^_d resolution/ordi- nsnca for n changes of o :ganization %reorranization, and have found that dc_umenc to be in "Plianee with the Cormission's resolution approving said charge of organization /reorgenizatlon, I further certify test, pursuant &c_ Government Code Section 56842, the COMIssiop has deternined the a.!nu•'+t of property er chsged znonq the affected aget.cies. Executive Oil =Ctr I: OM )ate 5 P i i aiT�•1. .�i' 16p1 23c•2o6 • snn d1490 TU Local t6ow gl 170A 452 . �:..' Moo Vad11c fan dNgealx+D( hj AMENDED INDEBTEDNESS )14D - CERTIFICATE RE: TERIt4 AND CONDITIONS f�i. .• s Aeorganlaation' . C,.b ~ - - Suh�aet: 'San Oieguito rsrrw� (Incorporation) (RO85-9) ^�ie1O1' Certain terms and conditicna are required by the Local prior to the ' Agency Formation Coaraiss ion to be fulfilled of organ3ratl.on. �. aa�n comp letion of the above -nomad change smear. ysrlr area d r: Oae.wr STENOGRAPHER NARIA A. TISCARENO (Title) ' ce.av sord a f Name) . and condit3 Ana listed r.awa do hereby certify that thn teems sm a.p below have been fully "et' -- to ax ' -nded npawMr conform 1. The boundaries shall be modified to attached hezeto. 'I fs+r aEyr Exhibit A and Exhib`_ts B-1) Ext ibis E 2. t.11 tezms and conditions listed in amended :adr -rr�. taP.)n...cn d attached hereto. I Gda vm ra..r Alariur l4rPern ' rr t. raw. Gnw Vwnv.+ Emp�n Pawu.n Cmwrno^ O.mn �Pr.Y1 Came ae.e Y Saw.+ra+ tktr `MYa CwK.Mm. r:ry o: P A MTI " t,.0, 0r'� exist }nq b;,nded any o..er.n i.eu. will the affected pr,;�CLY bn taxed for Yes indebtedness or contractual' obligation? E.rvNr ornow If Yes, specify. LYrd ' Slpr.ature June 25, 15E5 �0 ^ace yyO 763 No. 6 AEDHESDAY, JUNE 25, 1966 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONFIRMING ORDER OF REORGANIZATION (SAN OIEGOITO REORGANIZATION.) seconded by Supervisor Bilbray On motion of Supervisor Bailey the following resolution is adppted: 7z WHEREAS, pursuant to the District Reor_anization Act of 1965. Commend n9 with Section 56000 of application was made oynresolutionco atheeEncinitasv Fire in the Government Code. pp Protection District; and WHEREAS, on t:ovember 2`., 1985, and as modified on December Z. 14155 and January 6, 1986, the Local Agency Formation Commission, as Resolution No. R 85-9, posedtAeo•9anizatfoo Consf sting of the Incorporation ofCrmmiCoiimunitY of approving San Dieyuito, annexation of one offshore acre to the City of hilent Of e it of detachment of 1,054 acresEnc00it as SanitaryLOistrict sand the rnciiita;n Fire Daeduato Mater Ui str act, nexitiuti on of Protection District as subsidiary is ricts of the new City: annexation of territory (1,120 acres) to Encinitas Fare Protection District; County Service Areas 9U, 34, 91, and 92 and detacrt�ent from County Service Area 83' approving the Oro OS reorganization and autha rizing the board of in ervi SOanceowithLRezoL tdi oo No cR0 65�9e and3pursuant tor Government rCodctatfon Section 56430 et seq.; and WHEREAS, on January B. 1986 (7), this Board adopted its resolution initiating proceedings for reorganization and setting a hearing an the matter for January 29, 1986; and WHEREAS, at said hearing on January 2g, 1986, this Board heard and received any oral or written protests against the reprganizati ion any request. t..r respect to modification of its terms and conditions, Y evidence wnich were made, presented or filed; NCW THEREFORE WHEREAS, this Board closed the hearing on January 29, 1986 and INVOLVING THE `ts 1NCORPURAO IUNFOFHTHBUC OMMUNITYP OF V SAND DIEGUITONSUBJECTATo CONPIRHAT'ONI OF THE VOTERS, CALLING ELECT JUN AND DIRECTING REGISTRAR OF VOTERS i0 PUBLISH NOTICE OF ELECTION (SAN DIZG'J170 REORCANIZATION)'; and NHEREAS, on June 3, 1986, an ese:ticn was held within the territory contained in the boundaries of the proposed City as described in Ex.00 tr D, attached hereto, and within any territory Described in Exhibits B. boundaries of Exhibit A. on the attaChed hereto, which is not included in tn? following question: ( N. r.' a *.wW__J 766 - 2 - -Shall the order adopted on January 29, 1986, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of -an Diego ordering a reorganization involving: (1) Incorporation of the community of San Dieguito; (2) Annexation of territory to the City of Carlsbad; (3) Detachment of territory iron the City of Carlsbad; (4) Reorganization of the San Dieguito Mater bistrict, Encinitas Sanitary District, and Encicitas Fire Protection District, from independent districts to subsidiary districts of the new city; (5) Annexation of territory to the Encinitas Fire Protection District; (6) Detachment of territory from County Service Area 83 - San Dieguito Local Park Maintenance; (7) Dissolution. of County Service Areas 9D, 34, 91 and 92 and formation of municipal improvement districts; aM (B) In accordance with Vie State Constitutional requirements, the estahlishment of a maximum appropriations limit for the new city of $17,320,925 for FY 1987 -88; be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions specified in said order;' AMEREAS' on June 3, 1986, an election was held within the territory contained in the boundaries of the proposed City as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, on the following questiaus: 'Shall the new city be named (vote for one) Encinitas Rancho San Elijo C7 San Dieguito 'Shall members of the city council in future elections be elected' (1 :Ote for one) By District At Large In addition, voters shall cast ballots to fill the following elective offices: Me.nbers, City Council (rote for no more than five) z 0 ! to al I. st I � t !' I ;l 765 w 3 - ♦c ,_ the Registrar of Voters crnvassed the returns of said election y f,NO MMEREAS, and has certified the results of 11 is canvass as follows: S� 13+ 595; YES: 9,439 N0: 4,156; i a (A) TOTAL VOTES :AST: Encinitas; ``> 8 The majority of votes cast were for naming the city 4 548; AT LARGE: 1,816; o'... (C) TOTAL VOTES CAST: 12,364; BY DISTRICT: . Rick Shea (4 -year ( The foil owing five candidates received the highest number of votes for the D) Anne Omsted (2 -Year term), Greg Luke offs ,eGe raldt5teeln(2'year rterm) Gaines (4 -year term), f. (2 -year term); Ni7A THEREFORE li IS 0.ESOLVEO. ORDERED AND DETERMINED as follows: 1, A majority of the votes cast er :of election held on June 3, 1986 on the ddestion of confirmation of the voters of the order of this Board on the I proposed San Df eyui[o Reo rganization was 1n favor of Sul rrorgani zatton. 2, The order of tl.is Board set forth in the "Resolution of the Board Of Calling Election ant cu Derviso rs Ord-ring Reorganization Involving the Incoporation of the C�>nnu ^�CY of San Uieguito Subject to ContoPublon of Voters, 1Y86. is adopted by this Board of Supervisors on January 29, Ulrecting Registrar of ` loters to Publish Notice of Election (San Jieyu en Reoryanization)'. conf'rmed, a> provided in Government Code Sections 5644] and 1S2ti2. Lt Cached 3, The reorganization consists of the Incorporation of a new city to t e CO the City of Cdestr ad, the exterior boundaries called Encinitas, having exterior boundaries as descry Ac�acnmEen[1 o(L tzrri COry, hereto? annexation of territory attached herato; Of which are described in Exhibit B, from tna City of Carlsbad; ds described in Exhibit C attached hereto, of andrEnclni CasnFiret Pe ocecti oo Distric water from[ independents districts ato Sutsidtary districts of the new city Dursu ant to the annexations off territory r to the Reoryanization Act of 1965 (G. C. 56403); as described detachment of territory, Encinitas Fire Protection District, one exterior boundaries of which are .ram CSA No. 83 - San Diequito91 and Parsubject described in Exhi O'a D, attached hereto; in Exhibit A, attached hereto, Service Areas gU, Maintenance; and dissolution of Coa my to the terms and conditions as Stated '.n Exhibit E, attached herein. tton are contained in 4, The terms and tooth t:bns of the reo ^yani za Exhibit E, attached hereto. The Board 5, Pursuant to Government Code Section 35262 and as sped fled in the terns 986, one territory descriued in and Conditlbns of one Ave eoryarzat 1. attached as Exhibit , hereby declares that hereto is e inc.rpurated as a city rained `.ncin'.tas. Exntbit A. ww i �' r 766 4 6, Pursuant to Government Code 52ction 35262. the system of electing council members which is adopted as a result of receiving the highest numtar of rotes 7s election at large. Marjorie Gaines (4 -year T. Pursuant to Government Code Section 35 ear term), Anne Dmsted (2 -year term). Rick Shea (4 -year term) ,Gerald declared( to be the nemDe rs of the Encinitas term), Greg Luke (2 -year term); City Council because they wpre the five candidates who received the highest number of votes for the office of City Council. Code g, Pursuant tothevtn eenreceivinyc the lawest�numbereofi votes e shall hold rs of the City Council, and the two receivioy the office until the first l. t succeeding general municipal electlon held in the City and until their successors are elected and qualtt ed, highest number of votes shall no office until the second 0 5 al. elected el general quail f5ed ellft two orl more membersy ofnthenCI tytCounctic are elected the Sam number of rotes, the terms cif each shall be determined by lot. The members of the our ho i cted tofsuc eed years from tneeTUasday succeeding their election, and until th ?ir successors are elected and qua11f1 ed. of Encinitas g. Pursuant to Goverment Code Section 3byCy thetCountyy for conductingsha11 reimburse the County for the expenses incurred b Proceedings. including notice of public hearing. calling and conducting the election. rIF, iz 10. Pursuant to Goverment Code Section 54902.5. the State Board of Equals tat ion fees snail be deferred until such lima that the new City receives C its f•rst revenues. 1•T IS FURTHER thR tErcOo utionhto the Zxecotive office of theeLocalaAgenc[ake that certified copy so that the Executive Officer D vision Fcrmat!Gn Commission of San Diego (Commncin with Sec. 5[450), Part 5, the actions reclAredtby Ch(ctdaanenci ^9 with Sec. 549UD). Part 1, Division 2, 11 1, Title 6, by p Part 2, Division 2, Title 5, and by Chapter 4 (commencing with Sec. 35350), Title 4, of the Goverment Code. i3 B a v 7. G 767 5 - PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the Coursing fa ten Diego. State of California, this 25th day of June, 986, by AYES: Supervisors Bilhray, Bailey, folding, Williams, and Eckert NOES: Supervisors None ABSENT: Supervisors Noae IA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) I, KATHRYN A. NELSON, Clerk of the Board of Suoervisors of the County of San Diego. State of California, hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original resolution passed and adapted by said Board, at a regular meeting thereof, at the tint and by the vote herein stated, which original resolution is now on file in my office: that the same contains a full, true and correct transcript therefrom and of the whole thereof. Witness ny hand and the seal Of said Board Of Supervisrrs, this ?5th day of June, 1986 !6) KATHRYN A. NELSON Clerk of the Boa 0�f S isors _ 7� A. li carero (SEAL) L�paty J' \ �1 i C • RO85-9 "San Dieauito FeorSan yaa o3g8 ,oenced 1/5/4fi All that territory in the County of San Diego, State of California, ;1 t within the following described boundaries: Beginning a. the Southwest corner of Solana Palisades, Map No. 2560 on file in the office of the County Recorder of said San eon [henty, April 26, 1949, said Southwest corner also being a p oint Westerly prolongation of the centerline of Ocean Street as shown on said Map No. 2560; to l� saidc Mapl No. 2560following North 34.201 West d 165.14n feet according Nest 146.42 feet; North 60'38' West 67.32 feet; Norta 5038130' East 53.04 feet; North 3 °28'45" West, 137.27 feet; North 63'02' East 105.45 feet; North 54.31' East 84.76 feet; North 65.36' East 139.35 feet: North 43 °01'39" East 97.20 feet; North 34.56' East 56.11 feet and South 66 °29'10' East 42.18 feet to the Southwesterly right -of -way line Route State SHighway ANo. 101, file is District Yl, San Diego County, the Office of the State Divisicn of Highways in said County; 2. Thence North 55'l8' East in a straight line to the Northeasterly right -of -way line of said State Highway lJl; 3. Thence Nortbwcsterly along said Northeasterl, eight -of -way line to the intersection with a line bearing South 43 °04'21" West 477.72 feet (need) from a point on the Westerly line of the 203 foct right -of -way of the Atchison, Topeka and San ta £e Railway Company distant ther:on 1625.00 feet Southerly from the intersection of said westerly line and the noSeBecnardeno48ase Sect'_cn 34; Township 13 South, Range 4 West, and Merdian, according to United States Government Sur.'eY; 4. Tbence North foot right -of -way Of the and Santa the 200 Santa Fe Railway CampanY: c Thence Southerly along said westerly line to line eabr ig ht North E 83'44150' West frcm the Northwest corner of Loo t 29 of f Seahr r of said No. County, December office 10,1946E the Count - Recorder 6. Thence South 830'='50' East to said Northwest corner of Lot 29; Y. T} P Pace ! of la J lb NN � `l p' a 769 7, Thence along the followi,,g courses and distances according to said Map No. 2373: South 83 °44'50• East 219.38 feet; North 41'04'30' East 114.91 feet and North 3.50130• Hest 390.93 feet; S. Thence North 89.40'30' West 20.46 feet; West 9. tangen tNCurve0c ncave• Easterly having feet to the radius of 200.00 of 10. Thence Northerly along said curve through a central angle of 30'00'00• an arc distance of 104.72 feet; 11. Thence tangunt to said curve North 26 009'30' East 55.00 feet to the beginning of a tanqent curve concave Southerly having a radius of 150.00 feet; 12. 95*27e50*en acre distance ofcurve 249.92 feet;a central angle of 13. Thence tangent to said curve South 58 °22140' East 147.00 feet t• the beginning of a tangent curve concave westerly having a radius of 150.00 feet; 14. Thence Southerly along saiu curve through a central angle of 45.00'00' an arc distance of 137.81 feet to the al corner n_ land conveyed to 9ajimi Matsumoto, Y deed recorded August 16, 1955, in Book 5756, Page 277 of official records in the Office of the County Recorder of said San Diego County, said corner being in the intersection of the Northerly line of the Southwest gsarter`ofhthe Northwest nquarter of Rios ion. 35, said Township and Range, i Avenue. (R.S. 979); No ccurses 15, 16 & 17 18. Thence Easterly along Northerly line qu Northe said: corner the of the southwest qu a Section 35; 19. ^hence South P9e29' East aloha the Northerly line of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Sec.icn 35 to the Northeast corner thereof, as shown on Licensed Surveyors Map No. 375, May 1929; 20. Thence South 89'28'50' East (Rec. South 89'29' East L.S. 375) 666.6 feet along the Northerly line of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 35 to the Northeast corner thereof; 21. Thence South 0605' East along the Easterlf line of said Northwest muart:r of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter, 176.24 feet according to Record of 53rvey Map No. 3749 on file in the Gffice of the County Recorder of said San Diego County, October 18, 1955; Pace 2 or 15 •G W DO V G � 1 R085-9 770 i _ 22 . Thei,ce along the following courses and distances as shown on Glanctest Unit No. 2 flap No. 3562 on file in the Office of the County Recorder of said San Diego County, December 13, 1956, Soc :h 31 °58'00° East 101.39 feet, South 66 °53'24' East 528.54 ' feet and South 35 °53124" East 1000.0 feet; 23. Thence South 83 °19'03" East 7.13 feet to the Westerly right -of- vay line of California State Highway 5 XI- SD -2A, Map on file in the Office of the State Division of Highways in said Ccunty; 24. Thence generally in Northerly and northwesterly direction along said testerly right -of -way line the following courses and distances: North 16 °36'37' West 65.01 feet; North 22 °14'09" West 362.66 feet; North 09.54145° West 100.12 feet; North 12 °53!16" fist 292.41 feet; North 08 °50'29" West 367.48 feet; North 45 °23114' west 198.15 feet; North 15 °08'57' West 394.58 feet; North 58 °23'03" East 50.0 feet; North 18'41'31" West 245.94 feet; North 35 °12'03" West 120.21 feet and North 53.42139" West 236.30 feet; 25. Thence Northeasterly in a straight line to a point on the West line of the Northeast quarter or the Northeast quarter of said Sector. 35, distant thereon South. 0.42126" West 113.12 feet from the Northwest corner of said Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter; . 26. Thence North 0 °42126" East 113.12 feet to sa:3 Northwest corner: 27. Thence South 88 °51'41' East 1317.48 feet along the Northerly 1_ne of said Section 35 to the Northwest corner of Section 36, said Townslap and Range as shown on Secord of Survey Mao No. 6692 on file in the Office of the County Recorder of said San Diego County, June 15, 1966; 28. Thence South 89 150'56" East 2636.21 feet along the Northerly line of said Section 36 to the North quarter corner thereof according to said Record of Survey No. 6692; 29. Thence South 89 °50'02' East 496.08 feet along the North line of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 36; 30. Thence South C1101106" West, 658.77 fees :; 21. Thence South 89'48'08' Fast, 330.60 feet; 32. Thence North O1 °01'06" East, 658.95 feet; 33. Therce South 89'50'02' East along said North line +91.10 feet to the Southwest corner of the Southeast quarter of the soatheast quarter of Section 25, said Township and Rance; EX4I21 ?ace 3 of 15 i a j t I I i a 1 Z •o CIO_ C3 P ,c. K4 RG85 -9 0 771 .34. ':hence North 00'22'52' East along the west line of seid southeast quarter of the southeast quarter, 6e' -.27 feet acccrd ;nq to Rancho "..^ de los Caballos• Map NO. 8523 on ` -Sle in the Office of the County Recorder o`_ said county, March 16, 1977; 'i.. 35. Thence North e9'38'07' East to the southwesterly right -of -way 'F map on filed inutheyCounty71nginee stn ofRice� of said Countyide, kr . ` _ 36. A. Thence northw:sterly and northerly along said southwesterly line to the southwesterly boundary of Rancho Santa Fe, :tap No. 1742 on file in the Office of the Countv Recorder of said San Diego County, December 1922; 3. Thence North 32'20' .pest along the southwesterly line o`- said Rancho Santa Fe to a line which is parallel with and distant 60.00 fee: northerly, at right ancles from the south line c,f Lot 3 of said fractional Section 25; 37. Thence South 69047' Nest, 636.23 feet along said parallel line to the westerly line of said tot 3, being also the easterly line of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter o? sa -1 Fractional Section 25: 38. Thence North 0 °22152' East along the easterly line of said quartet- quarter to a line whitt is parallel with and d >stant 655.31 feet northerly, at right tngles °rom the south line of said quarter- quarter: ~ 39 Thence westerly along laid parallel line to the westerly line of said quarter- quarter; 40. Thence Forth 0'26'19' last alcrq said westerly line and along the westerly line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Fractional Section 25 to a point distant thereon North 0'26'19' East, 780 -00 feet from. th.e southwest cor..ei of slid southwest quarter of the northeast quarter: 41. Thence leaving said westerly line, "orti 6CO26'19" East, 959.06 feet; 42. Thence North 0 °26'19' Ezst, 72.00 feet to a co`_nt is the northerly line of said quarter - cuarter distant South 89 °56'41' East, 830.59 feet from the northwesterly corner thereof; 43. Thence continuing 'crth 0'26'19" East, 1296.95 feet; . 44. Thence South 60.26 "1.9" west, 959.06 feet co a point in the westerly line of the northwest cuarter of the northeast quarter of said fractional Section 2S: 45. Thence northe--1� alone the westerly line of said tea= ter - quarter .� to the north li;.e c`_ said tractional Section 25; ?••e 4 _- 15 I' I I G 772 4095 -9 46. Thence South 89049' East, '_579.89 feet to the westerly Line of i said Mao No. 1:42; 47. Thence `north 2-48-west along said '.resterly 'line to an angle point � therein, said point beine also corner No. 5 as shown an said � Licensed Surrey Nap No. !97; i I 48- Thence North 43'30'30' East along the northwesterly line rt o: said !!so Fu. '_741 to the cer.t�r line o: Seccnd Street (closed) 'E as shown on the Colony Olivenhain, according to Mao No. 326 on file in the County Becordec's Cffi.ce of said County, " 49. J'i'_y 8, 1885: I A. Thence North 72'23' West along said center lire to the ' intersection with the center Line of — Street /closed',, as shown on said Nan No. 326; B. Thence along said center lire North 15 °31.47" East, 402.02 `feet; C. Thence leaving said ce.:ter line. North 74018'13" Hest, 40.00 feet to the southeasterly 'line of Block 9, said Nap No. 326; ' -hence North 72 °27'45" !lest, 302.29 feet to the corthwesterly lire of said 31ecl; 9: -. Thence 'leaving said northwesterly line, North 74629'13" West, 40.00 feet to the intersection with the center line of 'E' Street (close =) as shown or. _:aid Map `o. 326; 50. A. Thence northeasterly alo:,g said center 'line to the southerly lir.e of Fourth Street, as shown on sand :rap !o. 326; E. Thence southeasterly along said southerly line to a line which bears South 15 133'39" rest frcm a point in the northerly line of said Fourth Street distant Eouth 72.30'50' East, 99.96 feet from an intersection with the center line o_ "." Street (cloyed), as shown on said Map ro. 326; C. Thence North 1S'33'39' East along said lir.e to tre northerly line of said Fourth Street; S1. A. Thence Ncrth 72'30'50' west, 99.16 feet along said northerly line to the center line of said 'G' Street; S. Thence t!orth 15°23':9" East, 71:.29 feet along said center __ne to the souther _y line fifth Etreet, as sho•+n n said Map So. 326: 52 ID Thence southeasterly along .. ta_d sc__.rly l.a.: t„ the eastec_y line cf said '.." Street; Thence no ^.`.easterly _lone sal_ eas-=_r_, :_n- to the center -cne of .-_. _.. .tree- fclltse'): I I 1 RG25 -9' - 773 i� "-- 53. Thence South 73 °21'30' East, the :e feet line - south ='- 72 °'' -7' East, 132.'_5 fee tl to the :enter 'line Oc Street (closed), as shown on said :Ia? No. 32ri; �I `'--_ 54. Thence North 15 °36'53" East, 823.06 feet and North 15 °391:5" Nest. 909 17 feet along said center line to the center 'line of 7th Street (closed) as shown On said °_a2 C:o. 326; 1� 55. Thence along said center line of 7th Street, South 72 °51'59' last, 252.91 feet; 56. -hence leaving said center line, North 15 °35'56" East, 791.45 iI ¢#3.- feet to the center line of Eightl. Street (closed ) as shown on :•�_' said Ma? No. 326; 57. Thence North 72 °47'24" :'.e st, 253.92 feet along said center line to the center line or said "F." Street 'closed); 58• aorthe linetOfl Ninths st_eettasa shown sond lin Noe 326; 59. 59. Thence South 72 °44'01" East, alona said north line to the center line of "J" Street (closed) as sn2wn on said nap No. 326; 60. Thence North 15 °40'13' East, along saic center line of said 'J" Street to the northerly line of Road Survey No. 448 (El Camino Del Norte), Crap on file in the County Er.g.n_er's C"ice of said County; 61. '" hence southeasterly along said rorther'_y line to the northwesterly line of said :tap No. 1,42: 62. TI.ence North 43 °30'30" East along said northwesterly line to an angle ?Dint tiie rein, said ocint being also corner ".o. 4 as shown on said Licensed Survey Map No. 197; 63. Thence South 65 °12'50" East, (Record - South 67° Crest) along the northeastarly line of said Nap No. 1742 to a point distan' th6reon North 65 °12'50' west, 1 180.00 feet from the southeasterly corner of Fra,tional Section 17, Township 13 South, Range 3 Nest., San Bernardino Ease and Heridian, being also an angle point in the boundary of the Rancho Santa Fe Community Services District, as established by their Resolution No. 85 -6, adopted Match 11, 1995, by said district; 64. Thence leaving said northerly boundary along said district boundary the following courses: A. North 6 °32'59" )Vest, 265.00 feet (record North 6 °04' Nest): B. North 67 °CS'55" East, 13 =8.00 feet (Record - North 66 °52'50" East) to the east line cf said section 17; .� 65. Thence northerly along the ear_ i>ne of said Section 17 to the w northeast comer t"reoz; ?age 6 __�15 a: 1, rA a J) (. R085• 66A- 668. 1 66C 0 7za Thence north eLly along the west line of Section 9. said Township Thence 13 Scup•`•, Range 3 West, to the north•+est cornet Of the sotthvast quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 9: :hence easterly ale tg the north line of said cuarteT- quarter quar quarter ur of he the southwest quarter of said Section 9; the northwest corner of the north half of ete toreheaIC quarts_ o. the soot-West q - rth half_ to the 66D. 67. 66 69 Thence sou .herly along the west line of said ro southwest corner thereof; The r.ce easterly alone t.`.e south line Of saidor ^9Leh half to ete east line of the west euarter of said Thence rorthef'_, along said east line and along the east line Thence nce vest euarter of Sect'- 4, said Township nd P.a r.Se Go ,he east and west center line of said Section v along said east and west center !ine �angee ':'hence wester_- said ^ownship and east line o' fractional_ Section 5, Thence xc rth 0'5%'05' best. 1.'63 -47 feet (Record - North Thence 5- :.'s tl a'_ong sa -= east line to the: north line of t.e south half_ o' eh'- r.or th half of said Section 5: test, 2014.96 feet; 70, Thence a`_org said north line South 89 55 40 307.41 feet 71, Th.er.ce _eav!no said north line South 0 °25'28" nest, hest _r on said point; to z non- targert 1937.00 foot radius curve concave southwester y, a radial line bearing South 49 feet , said curve throuen a 72. Thence nort`.'4esterlY, '- 022.26 feet a..ong cen _ al angle of 30'1417': tangent 20.00 foot 73. Thence North 70'39'12" West, 145.02 feet to a radius curve concave southeastef`nd southwester'_, 31.42 `feet 74- Thence rorth•:estetly, westerly, along said hest through a ce^•tfa'_ angle we 90'00'CO ": C. 75• Thence South !9 °21':8" Nest, 12.40 feet co a tangent 851.00 foot rad-cs curve concave nortn'.:esterly; 479,30 feet along saio zrg curve t`.rough a 76• Thence sar. ; +e of 32 ^- 6'34 ".: cnntrzl ie • 3H9•CH feet 'o t. ^.a easterly bcurdarY sits :, . :hereof No• ;I 77. Thence South 51 °3H' L" °aid San Cinco Ccuct7 of the :ancno _as .nt= ❑itas, according to Of filed in the Off =ca c= the Cecay Recordef of a'o ^_g sa +d et5ief!y houGCar% :0 the SOU :heist ,ce ..� :fatt_o al 6 0'- said Rancho Las 'nc= nitas: corner c: 1:0 CCl•2e_g i 1 's ''4 a; 775 Roes -9 •84. Thence westerly along the Southerly line of said Lot to r' the Southwesterly corner thereof; . 85. Thence Southerly along the Eastcriy lines of A Lots 8 and i5 of said Map No. 848 to the Southerly lire of said Lot 15; : =. B6. Thence Westerly along said line to a point 835.00 feet ti•; Easterly from the Socthwest CO cnec of said Lot 15; ;w. 612.00 faet; 87, Thence North 6 °40' Hest, B8• Thence Nor tb 87 °25 °34' West, 808.75 feet to the Westerly line of said Lot 15; 89, Thence Southerly along 4ssaid line to the Southerly line of Lot 14, said Map 90. Thence Westerly along said Southerly line to the nta Fe westerly line of Road Survey No. 454 -A (Rancho :.ants Fe Roader Nap on file in the County Enyineez's office of said county; along said Southwesterly l one tte i:esttr'_y gl, Tine b Nrcihwesrta8 No. 848, distant thereon 1323.85 line beat ^ng North B'. °03'55' Fast from a point line of 1, :,t t3•fiom the Southwest corner thereof; feet Northerly 92. Thence South 87 °03'55' west to said westerly line of Lot 11 being also the Easter!,.' line of Lot 12 of said Map 8<B; 9-. Thence So:th 2°50'30' East, 1323.8' feet along the eateeoly J line of said Lot 12 to the nuutheast corner thereof, also the southeast corner of Lot 11 of said Man 648; 94. Thence North 3 °3".5 'Nest along the ecste :ly line ounty Road -o- 11 feet sidel, nap on file to the noahtr ly zicht- of -�aay line of an uieg Survey l:o. '_631 (0livenhain -cad teez0 of said County; in the office of the County =rg =• 95?..Thence westerly and nor= hwestezlY. along said norther'' -Y line o_ said Ror.d Survey to the poi:: of intersectionwith the _1 ea5tezly sight- °=_way line Or 3oad Survey N°. '_800 -Ce of the tacproved September B, 19701 ^a? on file in the Gf County Eny 1. ^.eer of said Corr =p. said point being in the ar: of a ncn- tangent 9045 -CO foot radius South 88'S5'lgav eases[etly, a radiallite to sa:.- =oi It ` .ace 3 Of 15 l o co f A. 1. • 3'� G 1 77d ,8085_9 95E. "-'haace generally southerly along said easterly right -n, way line to the intersection :+i th tye east -west center line of Section ' -! 4 West; Township 13 South, 7ane 950. Thence westerly along said east- wesua,te re ofl said iSec` eon lliline of the west half- of tF.e southwest q 950. Thence southerly along said east line to the soutR line of stid section 11; 95E. Thence alsen t`ea southeast( corner off -e S?o�'ione 10.r said esterly thereof being Township and Range: r the •owns a northerly along the east line ^f said. Section 10 0 95F. ne of the soutti quarter of said Secton: north li Thence waste,'ly along said ror t'+ lire to an inter sect:cn With the westerly line of Road 5ur'iey No. 700 !saxony P.cad) leap o'+ 95G. file in the County .ng ireer's of--ice of said County; 95z. Thence sout'+er1y a:on9 said westerly line to a line which beats South 89 "•9'30 Pest from a point 1:1 the east line of rte southwest quarter "' '30 southwest quarter of said section l0 dls rant thereon North 1'08' East• 388.02 feet frog the soatteast corner of said oaartef-quarter, said point being point 0iI. Thence South P9'49.'30' We, along said line to an intersection wiry ht- of-way line of- State Y.igY.ofY xih�aysROf said the easterly rig ff •eat, on file in the OTLicof orti)- section tsars 1Soss h 83959'30' County. said po 629.07 feet from said Yoirt 'a": l 95:,. Thence along said easterly right -of -way lino as falowsc A, %Orth 18.22'10" (rest, 313.70 feet: tract): y. Noz th 16'35'45' test, 253.20 feet (Record - No: th C. f7ortS 17'18'44" }7es t, 3:0.00 faet (Re••crd - North 13.39• :vest): p_ North 20'10'!_ west, 352.28 feet: to an 12'.47 feet :Record 119 w2g soutzeasterly (rest. being E, North 2'7C'2Chere ir., s -id zncle point Lydia Lieber, hY ana le Forme ,robes and 3qe .ncle- Of rya land CO nvevec to =• i9, !909. and recorded in Book 1650, ? deed dated •• - 52id 4-4 of Deeds, c❑ Ofn 15 ( I i i A L 777 R085-9 95 Thence leaving paid easterly right- cf-way Nothe land East 521.94 feet to the host southerly dated ;.pr 4l. 16th 1920, and nrecorded to Ilerhert G- Stewart ty Book 1616. page 349 of Deeds; r North 60 °East, 58.16 feet along the southeasterly line 95L. :hence `., of the land so conveyer. to said Stewart to the Westerly line o- 1, 1930 and recorded in .,00k 17:2 page 150 of deeds; +, the land conveyed to Lester H. mitft and Katherine a. smith y dee'. dated ::ay '...; . 95.;. ^T.e hence along said westerly line. South 1 °02' West, 285.26 feet; 95N. Thence leaving adreurveq NO. 700c(Saxony Roadl; East Co the easterly line of sa:.• o .e southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of e50. "hence no!-herly along said easterly line Co the ni-th line of the south half of t.` said Section 10; 95p. Thence South 69'19' `East along said nrrth line to the north- spoil. '0: center line o£ said Section _ .`.erly alone s aid ncrth -south center line 95Q• Thence sou- - e itoPe the uthcrly lire of Road Surve_- NO, 462 lU nion Street) Trap on County Engineer's Office Of said County: crolong- along said southerly line and the Fosi371Y 95•.,, -hence eas ter.y line of Road survey ation thereof- to tn.. easterlyf- ¢ to the County Engineer's o:'c_ice (;tail Gardens Drive) ':a? on of said County: line to the 955. Thence North 17 °40'35' .test along said easterly said Section 10; east -west center line o: <_a_.t, 687.76 feet from the y Then, South P9 °02'40' East along said east -west censer l' ^.e o a point distant thereon South 09 °02'40 cente- of sa'_d Section 10; i line o= parcel Ha? No• 4957, filed 95'u• :hence leaving sa_d east -vest center line North 18 °'_2'12 West. 172.65 feet to the southt:r_y in t.`,e County Recorder's Office o`_ said County: East along said southerly line to tle 95 Ther.cc ocut1 89-07,59" i-rter of tae northeast quartet Of ling of ',:he soutnwes- q' - sa-d sect'_cn o; Ei1i =_T page '0 of 'S °o ca P 1 i 1 t 1 778 jo- RC85-9 '� 95e{. Thence nort`.erlY along said east line to the rort.`•east coiner i thereof: the north line 95=C. Thence North 8f 044'30' West 1]'_8.70 feet. along ' of said cu it to r- quarter to the north -south center line of said F... Section 10: said north- soot`. NoLih 2'16'5` -' East' 1-- 99.saide5ecaiong l0, being also ` .' 95Y. :hence and Rance; center line to tt.e north line Townsnip the south line of Section 1, Ease. 1976•]6 feet along ;!�.e nor t::-sout. _ 96A• Thence North 0 °02'1G' line o= For Po.: t' ;0 7832, filed in the Office of the center line of said Section ] to. the ro rtherly according to )tae thereo? ` county Recorcer of San Dieco County: 963. Thence South 89 °51'47" East. 138.29 feet along the northerly line of said Fax Point '4 C.`.e strtheaat corn'r thereof: 96c- Thence along the nartt.erly ?rolongation c£ the east 1lnE of said °he Point, :torch 0 °0 '16' East. G58. 43 feet mo -e or loss to the east - west center line c`- said Section 3• 4 7 °31'06" West to a 660. Thence leaving said east -west centerline N'list Lot 2, 5aie point in a line that is Pa, fr m th and distant sou t.`.er lY 660•G feet measures at right angles `_rom the nor trerly lire o`- Section 3: parallel line to a ?oint 96-_ Thence easterly along said list mentioned ? in a line that is parallel with anMed'sta }'t line toil said L0 2Eet measured at right angles f_om the 96F. Thence northerly along said last mentiored parallel line to a feet in a line that is ?zrallel oatthe ^�odreserly line ofl5uide"at 2 et measured at right angles ` ` parallel line �n the 96G. Thence id Section 3: easterly along said last p west line of said L 1 of saot oir.t in a line westerly line to a P ..:asured 96H. Thence southerly along said -scant southerly, J2az"Lotf let that is Fazallel ':ith and line of th right angles trcm the nor c5 erly the a_ccq said l +•st mentioned parallel line - Di to of l'ne of said Section 3, being also the westerly 961. Thence easterly easterly i and P.znge: Section 2. said ': cw ns,Ip ._he northerly 91. Thence nor-.erly along the westerly line or 'O line thereo'' ?age of LS tl •C - 1 '� RO85 -9 779 r ._.. ;. 98. Thence Easterl_ along said Northerly line to the North - south center line of Section 35, Township 12 South, Range 4 West; r S;.'. 99. Thence northerly alcnq the north -south center line of said �. Section 35 to the southerly lire of Road Survey No. 1736 -65 ?1 (La Costa Avenue) map on file in the County Engineer's office of said County; z. i 100. Thence generally westerly along said southerly line to the intersection with the easterly line of said State Highway . EI- SD -2 -A (Interstate 5) said paint of intersection being ) the most easterly corner o£ that certain parcel of land relinquished to r.he County of San Diego from the State of California by relinquishment No. 14729, as shown an Sh_et 11 of State Highway Nap No. 56 on file in the Office of the State Division of Highways of said County, also being a point_ ir, a non - tangert 399.99 foot radius curve concave southeasterly, a radial lire bears North 33 °06'13' West to said poii.t; 101. Thence along the boundary of ,a`d parcel of land the following ^ courses: A. Southwesterly, 307.06 feet along said curve through a central angle of 43.59'05" to the easterly line of Lot 9 of Section 33, said Township and Range; B. North 0 °42107' West, 65.19 feet along said easterly line to a point in a non - tangent 479.98 foot nadirs curve concave easterly, a radial line bears North 57 '41142' West to said point; C. Southerly, 131.47 feet along said curve through t central angle of 15141'36'; D. South 6 ^814V west to tce southerly line of =s`d Lot 9; 30 W_ 780 C.,-• ' R085 -9 �` -. . '4 _^ 102. Thence westerly along said southerly line to a line which bears South 34017'20' East (Record-South 34'06' East) from the southeasterly corner of Lot 1 of Avocado Acre- No. 3, according t!T' to map the No. 2063, filed in the County Recorder's Office of said County, October 3, 1927; 103. Thence North corner of said WLot 1, said line the south- easterly rly on file in A7enue the eCountya Engineer's ooffice ( of said aCounty; map 104. Thence westerly along said northerly line to a line which bears South 7.01'34' West from an angle point in the westerly line of said State Highway formed by the courses 'North 75 °32'04' East 125.00 feet and North 7.01'34' East, 37.76 feet', as shown on said State Highway map: 105. Thence North 7 °01134' East along said line to said angle point; 106. Thence along the westerly line of said State Highway the following ccurscs: A. North 7 001'34' East, 37.76 feet; B. Nor'.h 16112'31' West to an angle point; . C. North 50 022141' West, 134.78 feet; U. North 43'25'30• west, 241.70 feet to the easterly boundary line of Lot 8 of said Section 33; 107. Thence nortberly along said easterly boundary line to for northerly boundary line of Lot 8 of sa ;d Section 33, being also the southezly meander line of the Salt Marsh of the Baticuitos Lagoon, as the said meander line of the said salt marsh is shown and depicted upon the plat of Fractional Township 12 South, Range 4 West, S.B.B. & m., dated October 25, 1875, on file in the B. S. Surveyor General's Office, San Francisco, California; a 1 1 J. S: w.1 1 � f r' toss -9 781 ;•i 1pH. Thence northwesterly and southwesterly along the northerly • _ line of Lot 7, said Section 33; boundary line of dot 8 of said Fractional Section 33, to its • incecsectior. with the easterly 109. Thence „ outhwesterly, westerly and southwesterly along the _ is northerly also the abovementioned meanders line o£l said Salt Hareh, which the most westerly corner of said Lot 7; 110. Thence continuing along said meander line to ere northeasterly it line of State 9ighway XI-S9-2 -B (Formerly 0.5. 101 as located in 7uly 1955); 111. erly along said northeasterly line to Thence generally southeast the intersection situ the, prolongation of the northwesterly line of that certain road easement, 60 feet in R. or width, a Conveyed Hl Exh ibit -C- of the egrant husband and of easement wife, bed file page 76- 127564 in official recorded April 29, 1976' by records of said county, the center line o£ said road easement, being described as follows: San Bernardino Base Beginning at the inters ^cticc of the northerly line of lot 10 of Section 33, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, and Meridian, as said Lot l0 is shown on Record of Survey No. 5241t filed ehe southwester ly linesnfr�alif ocnia State r0ig Highway ^ 1936. Road XI- S� -2 -B; thence outh 66046' West thereof s459.74 nfeet to line of lot 10 and along prolongation an ang 1,: point in the westerly boundary of athe land described uLry under Parcel 2 in d -ea to Geoxge0f£icial�Records; thence along 51 1955 in Book 5486, page 231, said toundary line South 3L °44' East, 108.27 feet; thence South 37 °56' West, 30.51 feet thence continuing along the boundary of said ADue land, SoutD 51 °04' East, 77.50 feet; thence South 67 °32' East, 75.00 feet; thence South 78 °12'; East 10U.00 feet, to point °A'; being the northwesterly corner of said 60.00 feet vide road eSouthn thence Ezst, 30.00 feet alono the true pointy off said Rhue land, beginning of said oceatc;Lline; oncavec to the north £ and having aeet to the beginning radius of 2130.00 feet; thence aJ.org the arc he beginning oe of 5a fee=; thence North 59° East, 28.00 feet to the hogs curve concave to the south and Navin 56.116d feet; f thencep along, the thence along the arc of said curve, arc of a reverse curve concave to the north and having a radius of 189.50 fete, 155.282 feet; thence along rdius of 1B9.50 r feet, the ppp curve concave to the south and having the southwesterly fee-; then liner of California£ -rate Highwayt Road c XI-S -2 h oint of c B, said intersection being the terminal p... ter lire of }J -` the 60.00 foot wide easement; -XHID'- of 15 lace - z .o .7 �1 R085-9 te�. ly i..,. along said nortteasterl "f wide toad Ali A." Thence genera ;na the nar`.hwe5terly line of said 60 £e et prolon9at_or aint .+1... easement to said P 00.()r) feet; 4 113• Thence North 73 °12' Hest, ggagr� 114. Thence North 67 °32' Nest. 77 50 feet; North S;s 51 °04' Hest, 115• Thence S Nest to an intersection with the mean big !'. 116. Thence South the( Pac=.fic Ocean; 1 ,;,;- tide line of of the State of 14 v 117. Thence due Hest, 3 miles to the boundary California: the State of California f', along said boundary of 119. Thence southerly ra longativn of the center line of Ocean to the So twesterlY said Map No. 2560; street :.c cording to the Southwest Northeasterly along said prolongation No 2560 and the 115• Thence z pa'- isades according to said Map corner of Salaninning• point of beg 12,810 + or - acres (land) 13,190 a or - acres f'�a cerl sc:na ly g6 Jan. 13, LArCO dc�. von JAN - 6 C%F'B -m Pace 15 0f L. I W_ i `;'Y L] ,.oz5 -9 783 A1,NEXATICN TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD PARCEL NO. 1 - 1 .ill those subme:g ed lands of t -he Pacific Orean, in the County of San j Diego, State of Califotnia, lying Within following described boundaries: Beginning at the most weste being rly corner of Lot 7 cf Section Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, g a the southerly meander line of the Salt Harsh of the Bat iSu itos L:.a Don, as the said meander line of the said Salt Marsh 'no shown and deppiccted upon the plat of Fractional Township 12 South, M., dated Octcber 25, 1875, on file in the O.S. Surveyor General's Office, San Francisco, California; 1. Thene linecofc Staten Highway xI SSDd2meBa( northeasterly onZining Formerly U.S. 101as located in July 1955); 2, Thence generally southeasterly along said northeasterly line to the intersection with the northeasterly prolongation of Teeth is northwesterly line of that certain road easement, widL:t, conveyed to Milton R. and Audrey J. Nims, busb>.nd and wife, as described in Exhibit °C° of the grant of easement recorded April 29, 1976, by file page 76- 127564 in official records of said county, the center line of said road easement, being described as follows: Beg cvntng at the intersection 2e South, Range 4West, northerly line an 10 Of ease Fection 33, Township and Meridian, as said Lot 30 is shown on Record of Survey 110. 528, filed in the County Recorder's office on February 7, 1936, with the southwesterly line of California State Highway Road xI- 1100 and along South 66"461 prolongation thereof 459i7a northerly line of angle Lot point in the westerly ooundary of the land described ender Parcel 2 in deed to George N. Rhue, et ux, recorded January 5, 1955 in Book 5486, page 291, Official Records; thence along said boundary line South 36 °44' Eart, 108.27 feet; thence South 37'56' West, 30.91 feet thence continuing along the boundary of said Rhue land, South 51 °04' East, 77.50 feet; thence South 67 °32' East, 75.00 feet; thence South 7E°12' East 100.00 feet, to ?Dint 'A'; being the northwesterly cornet of said 60.00 feet wide road i easement: thence continuing along the boundary of said Rhue land, h South 14° East, 30.00 feet to the true point of beginning of said 4! line; thence North 76° East,. 29.50 feet to the beginning center ce a ct: rve concave to the north and having a radius of 200.00 of feet; thence along the arc of said curve, 59.341 feet; thence - North 59° East, 29.00 feet to the beginning of curve along the to the south and having a radius of 189,50 feet; thence along tie arc of said curve, 56.116 feet; thence along the arc of a reverse curve cocave to the narth and having a radius of 1E9.50 feet, n CC ^All V •J 784 ROBS -9 165.282 feet; thence along the arc of a reverse carve concave to the south and having a radius of 189.50 --eet, 59.450 feet: thence North 46 °59'30' East to the intersection with the southwesterly line of California State Highway Road XI- SD-2 -B, said intersection being the terminal point of center line of the 60.00 fo.;t wide easement; 3. Thence generally southwesterly along said rc atheastezly prolongation and the northwesterly line of said 60 feet wide road easement to said point 'A'; 4. Thrace North 78.12' West, 100.00 feet; 1!j" S. Thence North 67.32' West, 75.00 feet; 6. Thence North 51.04' West, 77.50 feet; Thence South 64.16' West to an intersection with the mean high tide line of the pacific ocean, and the true point of beginning; t 8. Thence northwesterly along said mean high tide line to the intersection of raid southerly meander line of the Salt Marsh of the Batiquitos Lagoon; 9. Thence southwesterly along a line parallel with the most southwesterly line (having a bearing South 51 033110' West) of that certain uninhabited territory known and designated as the 'St. Halo Beach Addition to the City of Oceanside' annexed to said City of Oceanside on November 3, 1950, pursuant to Ordinance No. 6:8 adopted by the City Council O: said City of Oceanside on September 13, 1950, said parallel line being prolonged southwesterly from the intersection of Mean High Tide Line of the Pacific Ocean and the southerly meander line of the Selt Marsh of the Batiquitos Lagoon, as the said meander line of the said Salt Marsh as shown on the aforesaid plat of fractional Tormship 12 South, Range 4 West, S.B.B. i M., to the intersection with a line which bears due west from the true point of beginning; 10. Thence due zest along said line to the true point of beginning. 1.00 + ac e sc : i 4 12/19/85 _ c,,,,,•„n nn� LATC0 JAN - e cf�ct_wzc IZ q a . R085_g '"San ^iegu:to ReorSan:ration 785 DETACRME2.T FROM THE CITY OF URLSBA:J PARCEL NO. 2 Ocee All those submerged lands of [h5taterofcCali fornin,the lying within the Carlsbad, County of San Diego, following described bounLaries: Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 7 of Section 33, Toalsorp Be South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, being as then said meanders linen. f then saidl Salar Marsh iseshowngand depicted of upo.1 the plat o£ Fractional Township 12 South, Range 4 Hest, S.B.B. 6 M., dated October 25, 1875, on file in the U.S. Surveyor General's Office, San Francisco, California; ne 1. Thence continuing Highway along I said 2meandermerly U.S. 101 as b located y iu State July 1955); 2. Thence generally southeasterly along said olorh e to acion of the the intersection with the nactheaster.'y p =' 9 in northwesterly line of that certain road easement, husband 60 feet and width, conveyed to Milton R. and Audrey J, Nims, wife, as described in Ex hibifilee pig et 76- 127564 in official .� recorded 4oril 29, 1976, by recores of said county, the center line of said road e�sem =rt, being described ac follows: Beginning at the in 12 of the 4 West, northerly Bernardino Base Section 33, Township 12 South, Range 4 west, and Meridian, as said Lot 10 is shown on Record of Survey No. 528, filed in the County Recorder's Office on February 7, 1936, with the eoutt.westerly line of California State Highway Road x2— of 0 and'alongc then prolongati nethereo_f 4591a4n feet e toyani angle Lot point in the wes ecly boundary of the land described under Parcel ux, recorded Jani:a ry 5, 1955 in 2 in deed to George N. Rhue, et Book 5486, page 291, Official Records; thence along said boundary lire Soutt 30 °41' East, 108.27 feet; [hence Soutb 3'.°56' West, 30.9'_ feet ththence Last, 779501feet -, thence south f 67032' East, said land, to point 'A'; 75.00 feet; thence South 78'12' -East 100.00 feet, being the northwesterly corner of Chedboundarye of said Rhve land, easement; thence continuing along soutb 14' East, 30.00 feet to the true point c_ beginning of said center line; thence North 76' East, 29.50 feet di the beginning 20-0 of a curve concave to the north and having a radius of 200nce feet; thence along the arc of said curve, 55.`341 curve concave to No cth 59' East, 28.00 feet to the beginning the the south ane having a radius of thence alcngr the arr of a9 reverse arc of said curve, 56.116 feet; C a�)eylTea2 _V R0H5-9 0 796 curve concave to the north and having a radius of 189.50 fret, 155.282 feet; thence along the arc of a reverse curve concave to _ the south and having a radius of 199.50 feet, 59.450 feet; thenre North 46 °59130" East to tae intersection with the southwesterly line of California State Bighway Road XI- SD -2 -B, said intersection being the terminal point of center line oi: the 60.00 foot wide easement; 3. Thence generally southwesterly along said northeasterly prolongation and the northwesterly line of said 60 fa ^c wide road easement to said taint 'A "; ' 4. Thence North 78 °12' West, 1,30.00 feet; 5. Thence North 67 °32' West, 75.00 feet; 6. Thence North 51 °04' West, jl.gu reec; 7. Thence South 64 °16' West to an intersection with the sean high tide line of the Pacific Ocean, and Point 'B "; 8. Thence northwesterly along said mean high tide line to the intersection of said southerly meander line of the Salt Marsh of the Baticuitos Lagoon and Point "C "; 9, thence southwesterly along a line parallel with the most southeasterly line (having a bearing South 51 °33'10' West) of that certain uninhabited territory known and designated as the to 'St. Malo Beach Addition to the City of Oceanside" annexed said City of Oceanside on November 3, 1950, pursuant to Ordinance No. 668 adopted by the City Council of said City of eanside on September 13, 1950, said parallel line being prolonged southwesterly f:on the intersection of Mean High Tide Line of the Pacific oc aan and the southerly meander line of the Salt Marsh of the Haticuitos Lagoon, as the said meander line of the said salt Marsh as shown on the aforesaid plat of fractional Township 12 South, Range 4 West, S.H.H. 6 M., to the intersectior. with a lire which bears due west from Point "B" and the true point of beejinning; 10. Th_nce due west, 3 riles to the boundary o`_ the State of Cal..fornia; 11. Thence southerly along said boundary of the State of Ca;ifcnria to a line which tars sc'�t;j 51 °33'10' west f:..;, the `rue point of . beainr.ina; 12. ?hence north 51 °33'10" east along said line to the true point of � beg:rn.ag. Cron. I'C'' acres i , , we= i r a —1'1' x?' 787 j •RO85 -9 "San Dieguit0 peorganiration" Annexation to Encinitas lire Protection Distra 1 parcel No. 1 All that portion of Sections 34 and 35, Township 12 South, Range 6 Hest, San Bernardino calinornia, according to, LnitadeStatesyGovernment S Diego, State of i Surrey, lying within the following described boundaries: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Section 35; ; .hence easterly along the south line of said Section 35 to the south quarter corner of said Section 35; ?. Thence northerly along t`e north -south center line of said Section 35 to the southeesv line of Road Survey MO. 1796 -65 (La Costa Avenue) map on fi_e in the County = ngireer's Cffice of said County; 3. Thence generally westerly Iona raid southerly lire to the intersection with the east line of Lot 7 of Section 34, said TownsY.'_? 12 South. Range 4 Nest; 4. Thence dye south along said east line to the south line of said ref Lot 7; lalsos the northwesteoozne r of the southwest e southwest thr of 5. ?hence due west said Lot 7 quarter Of said Section 34; quarter of f the southeast q Thence due south along the west line of said ouarter- quarter to the soutnwest corner thereof: -h line of 7 quaz�erh�o the southwes East along then southeast Guasaer Cf the quartet' scut. *.west quarter of the soutneast quarter of said Section l4; 8. Thence a'_ong the west line thereof North 0'35'50" Wast. 669.5c feet to the northwest corner of said quarter - quarter- cuarters 9. Thence %orth 89'47'31" East, 66'_.56 feet along the north uarter; thereof to she northeast corner c: said quarter -quaz' =r -q 10. :hence along the nort`. line of the South Y.a l: of t.`,e yc =Cho 89,37 cuarter of the southeast cuarter of lined`hereo`_, beinq also the East, 1322.28 feet to the eas.ter17 westerly line of said SCCti3n i .92 a:cng wester lv ^nenco Scuth 0 °39'42" vast, £cc _ to the ;tint of bee_ancr.g. 233.:? Acres 788 I Parcel No- 2 Range 4 Vest, ?o' +nship b1 South, 5 T11 that portion o`_ Sections 2 and in the County of San Diego, State San Bernardino Base and Mezidia n, ^t. of California, according to United States Government Survey, lying Y:.. within the following described boundaries: said rzni,.g at the °O F. nr ec 4�Westto Sect'_nns 2, 3, 10 and 1, Township 13 South, 9 ' tte south line of said Section 2 to n an 1. Thence cue east along Rancho Las Encinitas, intersection with the wester''v boundary o£ according to Y.am thereof No- 848, filed in the County Recorder's !-< Office of San Diego Count,' June 27, 1598: u: wa line o`_ San Diego Ccunty Road 2. Thence northwesterly alone said we.s tezly boundary to an ntersection with the northerly right-of' Y Survey No. 1631 (olivenha -in Engineer o 0 saidtCounty ;nap on file .n the Office of the Cccnty _ng } 3. :hence westerly and northwesterly aicng said rortne_'_Y lire of wa line of Road Survev Ro. 1800 -1, lapproved September e, said Road Survey to the poir - -t ofnte_seccion with the easterly right -O `-- y E ineer of said 1970) can or. file in the office arc ao non - tangent 9045.00 food County, said point being pint bears radius curv= concave westerly, a radial line to said r South 88 °55'16" East: 4- Thence norther_y. 762.01 feet alo:.9 said ec o =v4.0- 31- to ay Point r ignt-of -way line through a centrzl ang'wm Ergineer's Station lying :o rth B6 °:5'05" East, 45.00 feed 89 +65.46 th in the canter line of said Hoad Survey: 5. Thence contin,iag along said right- -of -way line North 3'44'35" warier West to the intersection with a line which Sears North BB °39'20" sa'.d Townshic and Range East from a point in the westerly line of the northeast g of the southwest quarter of 5ecti,5`2' 914.20 feet from the distant thereon, South 4 °20'10" ` northwest corner thereof; 6. Thence leaving said. easterly point; line a10 ❑q said line South 88°39':0' '::es. 431.00 feet 7- Thence along said westerly line, South e ?0110" Eastttie southwest to the southeast corner of the northwest currier of quarter of said Section 2: B. The.:ce weeder'_, alcrq the south lire of said cuart,,-q =a =ter• to the westerly line of said Section 2, being also cw.e easterly line - o'- said Section 3; line t° a roint in a line =eet measured g. ?hence rorthnr`_y a'_org said easter y ion 7: that is pzrallel w,-hthed rozstan y line of•'otO 1, Sa_c Sect at right angles f- } -vV 77 w.Jw } y) I 4 8095 -9 789 10. Thence westerly along said last mentioned parallel line to th9 west line of said Lot 1; 11. Thence northerly along the west line of said Lot 1 to a point in a lire that is parallel with and distant southerly 208.00 feet measured at right angles !ran the northerly line of Lot 2 of said Section 3: 12. Thence westerly alona said last mentioned parallel line to a point in a lire that is parallel with and distant easterly 495.00 feet measured at right angles from the westerly line of said Lot 2: �- 13. Thence souther'_v alo,ig said last mentioned Parallel line to a ` point in a lire that is parallel witn and distant southerly 660.00 }- feet measured at right angles from the northerly line of said Lot 2: 'Itr' 14. Thence westerly along `aid last mentioned parallel line to a 1'_ne which bears South 7 °31'06" East from the northwest corner of said Lot 2: 15• Tl,en.e South 7 °31'06" East to the intersection of tw.e east and pro loc west center line of Section. 3 and the northerly ation `_ Of the east lire of said Fox Point, according to 4a0 thereof -0. 7832• filed in the Of =ice of the County Recorder of San Diego County; 16. Thence along said northerly prolongation South 0'02'16' hest, 658.43 feet core or less to the northeast corner of said Fox Point: 17. -hence Korth 89 °51'47" best, 138.29 feet eiong the northerly line ' of said Fox point to the north and south center line of said Section 3; nd south la- Thence 1916n36 thecsaid north south Lina of said Section 3; 0 °J2'16' west. south line to the point O£ haginning. 15- Thence easterly along said 1 415.59 Acres 1 i 1 parcel ::o. 3 All that portion of Sections 34 and 35, Township 11 South, Range 4 Vest, San °•rnardiro Base and neridiw: in the County me San Diego, Slate of Califcrni a, according to Cnited States Govee nment Survey ly i�xJ within the following described boundaries: Beginning at a point on the south line of the northwest quarter of the southwest cua =ter of section 25, distant thereon North 99'40'30' West, 633.53 feet, Erom the southeast cornet oil �h nq being the interne =ti.on !1 t ^e southwest CCd: .ter, said COint 0= " rf the center _i:.e of Rios Avenue , • the south '_ice c`_ said northwest cuarte: of the sout`.west c'_a: ter of Section '. Countlwneof_der _et in `:a? „f Cvoress Tract ::e. _:81, = the Office c_ _.. G 790 ROB 5 -9 '.of San Diego Coun_y: i, ':es along said center line of Rios Avenue, :hence North '' -7 "22'40 " 2602.62 feet: f Thence continuing along the pole West, l2U 00 feet an points on the Rios Avenue, North 13 °2_ 40" south line of the ror`hwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 15; Thence along said south line and the south line cf the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 34, t, concave °40'30' Pest, 446.80 feet to a point on a nonetan aae radials lire bearing easterly having a radius of 200.00 feet, point being the true North e0 854'53" West to said point, said point o- beginning; 1. Thence northerly, 59.60 feet along said curve th.r onSh a cep =tra1 angle " ° 5_ ^hence tangent to said curve North 26 °ve so party 55-00 feet, to t.`.e beg inns n5 of a tancent curve concave southerly having a radios of 150.00 feet: E. Thence easterly along said curve through a central angle of 95 °27'50 an arc distance of 249.s2 feet; .o 7. Thence tangent to said curve South 58 °22'40" East, 147.0] feet, the beginning of a tangent curve, co rc ave westerly having a radius G. 150.00 feet; 8. Thence southerly o`,117 81 feet to theo nor thwesterly cor rerg of 4 land 00" an arc 1i - � deed recorded August 16, 1955, conveved to Fajir.:i :tats o.•f off et al ec in Book 5756, Page 277 of Official Records said corner be of in e County Recorder of said San Diego County' the south•:est quarter the intersection of the nor t.`.ecti of the northwest quarter of Section 15, said Township and Range, with the center 'nine of said Rios Avenue (ans- 979); 9- Thence easterly along said northerly ' -ine and along the northerly lire of the southeast quarter of the north•.+e st guar ter and alo of the northerly line o`_ the south half of the noitheas`_ quarter o- said Section 35 to tte survey center line of Cali'' -ornia state Highway X?-sD -S according to Record of Su 'v ey D!ap "'oan�652__e ?led in the Of`_ice Of the County Recorcer in said County 10- Thence ro rthwestec'_y along said center line to the north line 0. said Section 35; 11, Thence westerly a'_cnq the -- .,OrthcrlD_. -in' of and Sectic-s 35 and .4 Y to the mean hic:n __ce line o_ the _ - .f -ace 7. "W - _ - 0 791 F Ro85 -9 Thence southerly along said 7:ean eiyh Tide Line to the southerly line of Lot 1 of said Sec =ion 34: • 13. Thence easterly aionq said southerly line and the soutt. line of the northeast quarter Qf the. norteast quarter of said Section 34 to the true point or eglnning_ 175.57 Acres 4 Y sc:lw 12/19/85 LA ?CD i Pace 5 o_ 5 �oom.e q me fool NAT Fw+Ntcn JAN -16 .n tz � P C 792 • Ado ?ted LL /'' -5 /ii ` TE8 + AND COtiD IT'.OaS Amended 1/6/86 .15 "SAN pIEGGITO p�)G (A05�9)ON" . • (INCCRPORAT i kf 71 1 The effective dace of this oSau Dieguito Reorganimation' shall be October 1, 1986, except as otherwise stated in these Terms and Condi after Gehat date: Code Sections 56470[p] and 56456). P Council a) Terms o. office for toe Government Code Sectic:a shall be ,bject s 35442 and 35443 (Government Code Sections 36503 and 56470[53): b) The City Manager, City Clerk, and City Treasurer shall be appointed by the City Council (G °vernne"t 3 Code Sections 35111.5 and 56470[40 % the c) pursuant to Government Code Shall, immedia:ely City Council of the new city prior to performing following its organization and p providing 6 any other of` -icial act, adopt an ordinance li :anon that all county ordinances fprestheretofore and fef fectp as City shall remain in c da s thereafter, ordinances for a period o_ 120 Y I or until the San S)ieguitO City Council has enacted ordinances s,iperseding them, whichever shall first occur (Government Code Section n 354 431% Board of- upervisors shall continue to Eurni.sh, d) pursuant tn. Government Code Section 35448. 'the i without additional charge, to the area incorporated urnished to the area prior to the all services '. year during wh_ch incorporation. Such services shall be furnished for the remainder ation became ceffective, or until i eh, incorp whichever shall first occur the San Dieguito City Council requests discon=inuan_ ( of the services, Y (covernment Code Section 56470[471: .f The incorporated portion o£ County Serve Area e) uito Local parks) shall be auto No, 03 (San Dieg `ub; .ct only latically detached withdthe from requirements o_ Chapter 0. t° conrliance ,ver. *Pmt Division 2, Title S cc the Government Code (G= ! Code Secticn 25210.90): .t =achnent E roses 1 of 3 CJ ell ., ' 1 1 -.-.4 i ( j CJ ell ., ' 1 1 -.-.4 793 to county RO85 -9 r, f) The new city si,all be the suooses of succeeding Service Area No. 81 for and obligatiors of County i; to all rights, duties, Service Area NO, 87 within the newly- •incorporated area. with respect to enforcement and performance of any outstanding contracts and obligations related to the maintenan Code of local park transferred to the City of San Dieguito (Government ode sections 56470[m] and 25210.90): 9) On June J0, 1087, title and responsibility for rn ercy of the County of San Diego all real p P ur oses --with the acquired /develcPO' for Lagoon, ouail Botanical exception o£ San Elij Gardens, Nagdelena Ec %e and the Encinitas tedL in ithe site - -shall be transferred Code Section City of San Dieg 56470[h]): of the -I for property tax monies, 57.SY'' h) Except )� portion of the unencumbered funds (including cash o^ ton them red it of due but County Services Area stznding No. 83 (San 0-1 gin.o Local ) news citysh(6o, ernma nt eC Ode to and Section 25210.90): to ed by i) The per- anent, £ull -time personnel emp Y the Coui ty and assigned n the dto here lorment. All benefits and rights o1 ir. San Dieguito shall be transferred to : P of t:ie new city. of loyment cont=acts, these em ploy hes- retirement rights or any other seniority r S rights —shall be continued employee benefits or At overall levels not less than currently vacation be honored and such other benefits as sick eav , leave and retirement benefits shall by the new :icy (Government Code Section 56470[1]): boundaries of County her inclusion j) The current pur..uant No. 17, shall not be chanced upon �f its territory within the new Cl- Com:ni ssion to Government Code Section 54790(h), waives the application o -- Government licatione fcthis the 25210.90 and finds deprive he residents o`_ the new section would city o`- a service needed and that en ure ish�'a iverawill we are of the new city to provide safety' and ,e aoiliLY nut af_ect any sere; and Attac`• ent E Pace 2 of 3 I I.- 796 k) Four improvement districts of the new city shall be formed with boundaries coterminous with each Of the boundaries of County Service Areas Hos. 9D, 34, 91, and 92. Each improvement district shall be the successor to one of the CSAs for the purpose Of succeeding to all the rights, duties and obligations of the CSA with respect to enforcement, performance or payment of any outstanding loans and implied or expressed contracts and obligations. The authority to levy the previously authorized benefit assessment for each CSA would be transferred to the new city and would be assessed for the appropriate CEA (Government Code Sections 56470[e] and [t]). 2. The effective date of establishment of the Encinitas Fi. -a Protection District as a su'7,idiary district of the new city shall be Oct -ber 1, 1966. The effective date of estab- lishment of the San Dieguito water District and the Encinitas Sanitary District as subsidiary districts of the new city shall be December 1, 1986. Upon and after these dates: yY+ a) The offices of the Board of Directors of each of the districts shall be terminated, and the new city council shall be designated as, and empowered to act 3s, ex officio the Boards of Directors of the districts. The districts shall continue in existence with all the powers, Outies, rights, obligations, and functior; provided for by the principal act, except for any provision relating to the selection or removal of the members of the Board of Directors of the districts (Government Code Sections 56470[X] and 56539); and b) The establishment of the districts as subsidiary districts of the new city shall not affect or impair the status of any duly - appointed employee of the districts. All benefits and rights of district employees -- including employment contracts seniority rights, and retirement rights - -shall be continued at an overall level not less than currently enjoyed, and such other benefits as sick leave, vacation leave, and retirement benefits shall be honored by the districts as subsidiary districts of the 'new city (Government Code Section 56470[1]). bara,eE M'�e Uol A,w FWMb ' tommunn a Sin OwP JA - 6 Attachment E +... Page 3 of 3 h� .o .. z \ �,AMrM•ti+lw��n RECORDING REQUESTED BY ',. nNEN REC 0-0-0 �y. PIEASE MAIL THIS INSTRUMENT TO -. San Dte:uito Union High School District Attn: 3odney E. Fh1111Ps a'62$ Ncrth Vulcan Ave :-Last ails, Co. 92024 +' k=ROte NO. TITLE NO. 714 '• I.C.Y .... ... :. ;gob El 1.10 26 :A 9. 06 VERA L. VI-vi Cahtai it:: -Cruz; j SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDERS USE ONL- NO Fa THIS DEED OF TRUST. made this - - -1 day of .Trly . 19 =5. bi,tweerg See Exhibit A attaches herein called TRUSTOR. UNION LAND TITLE COMPANY. a Catifomia Corporation. herein called TRUSTEE. and San Die3uito Ltnlon ?sigh School District herein oiled BENEFICIARY: N'imesmth: Trustor hereby gongs to TTUstec, in trust. with power of Sale. all that real prolmrty in lite San Dteao County of San Diego. State of Califomia. describe EDEC " ee Len41 Descrintinr. Zx^ttit _R Rt:tracned 2 11, EXHIBIT D - Setured Agreetenc together wish all appuntnanees in which Trostor has any merest, including water rights benefiting said Mal property whnhcr represented by shares of a company or oihcmit; and. FOR THE PURPOSE OF SECURING. (1) Performaree of each xgrernicm of Trustor incorporated bs refarntt carn the Fred hcrein:121 Paymcm a� one promissory nay mcos of such addmnnamade I arm as may From time to time Njv< ftc, lnxroMrd from cipal sum of S 131 pay she BereGaary or his aunnwrs in mycrest by the then record o. net of uid real property when rodenecd by endorsenleet on the rcwm side of the existing note or notes, or. q another prnmiaxory nose ur noln, ors!, each addnu.nal ad•arwc datto4•d by endorscrtsent on the Deed of Trust and each prior note. To protect the security of this Deed of Trust. Trustee agrees by the execution and the delisery of this Deed of Trust. and the nmc f Section A. pa aBe ;Phs Il that therym(rof. that ttnain Fiaitwus Deed °/ paragraphs I u `rrecorded on October s_i 1978. asxlDoeum nteNo�TRJa ll9l) ,( of Olficial Records, in the office of the Counq• Recorder of San Dlrgo Couny'. California. shall be and she) art hereD)' mc+rpvarcd hag Is it lands. obi gafaes and fwnin�n saidrproesiolnD hall b<wenstiuedsto efeghw the lands.roDligal nosy. and pmiesthrt fofnh nn lh i h. Its Deed of Trust..\ cop)' of said "I,isions is printed on the tesersr sid<uf this D<ed of Trtnt. Beneficun car its agent ma) many 'oil wch changes is is allowf I by law for the furnishing of BeneGuaq s SMtrm<nt SE. %of an) nosier of d,•fauh and an) not pa)mar . due on the nsde secured hereby'. The undersigned Tros I r:yunts Chas a cop; of Is hereunder be malted to him at his address hereinafttr set forth. In accw,w•ce won ^ectmn 2924b. Gea Code. requnt n naet made by the undenlyned TflUS90fl togry Nn of m,y N.•uee cu Drfaulr and a too of anY Notice of $ale under Dee" cal T,utl Cou_ty. Cal.•o•nu, in Book page3e,4I_.OttKistReeorM as alfe ,,ro at4ye desaAaW mc,,.1y, .etvieu by x T,ustw m wnKn - -- nnamed as BeneLO:•y. and IS Trustee. 14 malted in ..A,nr xaLwtn —• -- TRUST OR SIGN WERE STREET AND ADDRESS City SIGNATURES ON ATTACHED MIBIT ••C•• STATE V C x�Ll -ryY 1 I (x �•r . CO VI �t Robert R. Ball .. IF _ _a Aal yr' Ft B. Woton .: �P n on .dilly t net / difu >- LYalna M. Raver i. f 11I. i � 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF S. MMIBIT Ilan_ 715 (I.d —aualt IM wdanipnad. a NOlaly Peblie o and for will State, permmlly SPpurW ! yaparwr.alh known to rte ❑pond to ma on If. bkaia of .lslutory I... f a o,,. to W sne "I.M.l wlw•+ namalsl ate wMCnMd ti ARPKJ.tYL+hy III uln insuumanl and acsno..leOprM Inal _r!ISY saaCUl+d pF1{�dt+a la aw uma. LUELLA ,7. l•.'.1TRvU5 IIl y/ITNE55 my fund MO oHNUl4Rl n K3IAL1 R2lK CY04:CA SgNt .. ri T+ CLI Q, L J I t• Y.w CFq G,ur: 1 } urgf as ua..:4• e•J ++ 11 1! r .a,. s1„Y. + es. a\RFWT WAWXtV N: lln0.riduall STATE CF CALIFORNIA 1„ COUNTY J DieDo r I On +q 19a Wtora ma. the undarsgned. a Notary P.OIn to aM Iw sad Stale. parwnally app.... 0 Weston D W,,doany anown to on Opn.ed 10 n. on Ina basis .1 ael"'fulory ,,,,,....rw.a.. ..... w. evi0arne to W tW penonUl wan. nam.lsl are subscnWd 1dt,, innrvment and ukno,aladped mat Lbz) e..utW NyJyrV•8•:,ejW :X:TV.� 0w .me Ct:` ,..t l WITNESS my hand and ollnial al t, LUELLA R. T- i::'l:OUS S u1. Fo%; drf y.. -: -r'vr• ..an.s....s, }} v !er•x.:,• e. I1 .SSB j {J.'YJLyN IFXJ'N'fa•X.1•. � h � i'fJ (In! edupl 1 STATE Of CALIFORNIA I COUNTY OF Tpq AnZEIC- on�YQ:15f 1 1 9RS _ Waw1 me. the unears,nb. a No11, P-Wn 10 8110 1-1 No Stitt graoW W aapea'ad STA \LEY L. BAUEB Fel...cslly ancwnl. rr ❑INO•atlrorrw on the Wss of .uslanory �1., r..r w�.v.•_w.. r arWance to W the ailMot'l wn . namelal is Sunscnud Wdeametn.m.ni and.,kn..I,daad 1W1 he a +cutM Y°a C°FIC'IAL SEAL IIl WITNESS my nano 0 otl.cwl stal. ip K c N t •• AY)1 1P. "I ... • n. - :: •.v Pdpt SL 31111 R:r Ls A +pNk U Ind., STATE OF CALIfOPN.A —l„ COUNTY Of \ I /%'�' _ �• h j >' Gtlae me. tln u ^Or.:•y ^ea, a NoO.y Pubin n and IV a.•J Salt. perwwl•r •,pl lAr O papCn.y k.swnm on C),'p.n.ed toh.On In. W.0 tvaMCe 10 it 11t M.fon131 wM. namllll 4YOatI.bW f, r. \,1 +e I':i IO Ins gnstrumtnl [ntl if \nCn: k.lpl tl that 'T t•CC,..ka fC- '�a`�. : r l.l' � =•N�+ WITNESS my and .,a aBCaI sal 4 ul GJ.•N';:: : - .a w itT CIO Go V �i �Y S/ F`� _ 71.6 . VESTING Robert R• Ball and Elisae Hall, husband and wife, as their coamunitY .JI' too as their covaunlq property• as to an undivided, one -third as to an undivided one - third• interest: Fred Weston D. huebsnd and iwife• asi their :�- husband And r._fe, L• Dsmr snd Laverne H. Dauer, inceres[; 5[o nett', ae to an undivided one -third interest conouoitp p p C a � r I ' "t /Sim,` �.r• . 'r s co i EXHIBIT ._ LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3g I °I7 3 - 717 ORDER NO. 888757 -4 T, The lam referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of San Di ego, and is described as follows: PARCEL 1: �. All of Lots 1 to 10 Inclusive and portion of Lots 6 and ll in Block 77, together with a portion of Sanford Street and Juno Avenue, and also a Portion of the alley in said Block 27, as said Street, Avenue and Alley were vacated a+d closed _ to public use on November 19, 1915, by Order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego, a certified copy of which said order was recorded December 26, 1416 In Book 500, page 343 of Deeds, in the Office of the Recorder of said San Diego County, all being in North Leucadia, Su the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Nap thereof No. 524, filed in the Office of the Recorder of said San Diego County, April 6, 1968, described as whole as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southeasterly prolongation of the Westerly line of said Block 27, distant 20 feet from the Southwesterly corner thereof; thence l.rrchuesterly along said prolongation and along said Westerly line of said Block 27 to its print of intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 116.125 feet Northwesterly from the Southerly line of said Block 27; thence Northeasterly 320 feet along said parallel line to its point of intersection with a line drawn parallel with the Westerly line of said Block 27 and distant Easterly therefrom 320 feet measured at right angles; thence Southeasterly along said last described parallel line 136.125 feet to Its point of intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant 20 feet at right angles Southeasterly from the Southerly line of said Block 27 and the Northeasterly prolongation of said Southerly line of said Block 27; thence Southwesterly 320 feet along the last described parallel line to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL 2 dll of lots 2 to 15 inclusive and a portion of Lots l and 16, in Block 27, together with a portion of Sanford Street and Juno Avenue, and also a portion of the alley to said Block 27, as said Street, Avenue and Alley were vacated and closed to public use on November 19, 1915, by Order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego, a certified copy of which said order was recorded December 26, 1916 in Book 500, page 343 of Deeds, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego; all being in North Leucwdia, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Map thereof No. 524, filed in the Office of the County Pecorder of San Diego County on April 6, 1888, described as a whole as follows: Beginning at a info[ on the Southeasterly prolongation of the :escerly line of said Block 27, distant 20 feet from the Seutheasterly ccrner thereof; theme Northwesterly alone said prolongation and along said Westerly lire of said Block 27 to its point of intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant +80 feet Southeasterly from the center line of Monterey Street, as sa" Street is shown on -yap to. 763, of 'orth Leucadia, filed in :he Office of rh.e Coant. Record,• of San Diego Count,; thence Northeasterly alorg said parallel line to rT. e .i! Ca fw; CM (i3 V I� ~ EXHIBIT _ 716 SECURED AGREEHENT B4TWEEN OWNER AS DEVELOPER AWDGUlTO_ U_ h�ON Hl 50001 STRICT' _ lgg 5 LBch day of IIS SECURED AGREEI;ENT is entered into this .___. a corporation E1L �ttRT11ERs11TP, ,:aJ be Ltai -n (1) p? °ifica Develo cent GorD• lEIELCPER} Qlcinafter address is Y.o. Box ]470 __ _- referred to as "Developer ", whose -- AND of San Diego county, California, hereinafter referred ......,.,e leucadta, Cali_fo_rni g�OZa• W 1 T N E S S E T N: Tax Assessor Parcel r of the real property described and er is the owns "Property A• WHEPEAS, Develop and hereafter referred to as tlo. 254-052-11- -- -13, 254- 102 -s1 B. }tHERFA1 the Property lies within the boundaries of District; an C WHEREAS, Developer proposed to construct (2) 214 unite - �•il —_- �C°jeCt on said Property, which c1eveioPMe,t carries the Proposed name of Beach Ctub a and is hereafter referred to as "DeveloPOent and nave into the Proposed development; peveloper and District recognize that scltual facilities and services will no WHEREAS, subsequently be available to accom:bdate children who may and ment as WHEREAS, Developer future residents of the deand will not• to e! has 1egn�eet chef neleds0oftthet `ssuranceD'st{1Cschool tfac'ltttes a services will be avat lable to is aware that the for such it is presently proposed and the Developer be able to give Developer any such assurances without financial assistance to p services and facillt`.es; and to enable the De fInancroVidesassurances necessarye with veloper a��rees to provide su rees to p the adequacy of F. !:HEREAS. jQe„ent and the District dg encies cnnCernlnq the terms of c,,,pI 9trith any reRUfre;�+_nts of Public ve !ents described herein. Developer to carp : the needs of the develeA school facilities to acco:.VIOD e' _CV AGREE as follows: THE PARTIES HERETI Four- Wccdred�� " LJ'd "HEREFORE. thearA _, to the District tltUO I "t f i-c {ron: ttie apFrOved suh- 1, The Developer shall Pay for each dwelli"4 be constructed to the Oevetopme^ Recorder. The Dollars (S1 4;•y - �- units to be constructed shall office determined be located The nlaeber oY dwell my gent a,• 1-,-; orded in the Office of the county le !h:••lli;i,l unit building. such Payments shall be made in division map of the develops tens "O selling Unit" ev used in this nu- cemeni. roans a place of res leence an may in zither a sing he fallowing pl•e'i'. F,ns: accordance o-;ic.t i d r, v j 4 v Can r• SECURED AGREEMENT 7 L 9 Page 2' allments 1.1 The amounts due hereunder shall be paid to the District in Dollars (SI,,426, eqL31 to One lh .a and F4 ndred 'Kent Six respectively, tines the number of de ling units, for which bui ding permits are issued the total amount as specified in paragraph 1 above has been paid or until the agreement 1, ancele shall be due and pdyable to Lite District concurrent with issuance of said bo � r nceled by mutual consent Jre: to abandonment of a portion of the Ueselppuent. Sue. iuq permits. !1 Uw developer huf ids a dwelling unit with less thanattordinedto schooI Districts Doelicy ,.r iees paid shall be those fees in effect at that time, 9 �fywinea by therperate is sfncrease /decreasel reflected byfaheoConstructiona Index of then Engeter- nearing News Record. The fee due is calculated as follows: index at date index at date adjusted av` of bldg peemft NINUS of agreement TINES at i date of EQUALS unit 1 Do plus index at date agreement rate of agreement amount computed using the adjusted unit rata as :b.• The amounts due and payable -hall be the umber of units. described above tints tiie n 1,2 Any payments not made by the Developer when due and payable shall bear interest at the prime rat.. Bank of "rica, N.T. and S.A., plus two percent e 3bo provided, however, that the interest shall not exceed the maximum allowed by law. The above prime rate shall be the rate in effect as of the date of the District signing the agreement. 2. To secure Developer's obligation hereunder, Ueveloper shall provide to District the securities called for in sub- paragraph 2.1 or 2.3 or 2.4. rict 2,7 A surety bond in favor of District in a form acce too >insure Developer's aperformance rOf acceptable to District in the sum of $ n/a the terms of this agreement.(3) in the ev5tis brought upon this bold by sa'd Dis- trict and judgaent is recovered, the surety shall pay in addition to the above - specified sum- costs incurred by said District in such suit, including reasonable attorneys fees to be fixed by the Court. 2.2 A bank or savings and loan time certificate of dep ^sit in the amount of S n/a in a form acceptable to eOpressly providing thattany tinterest raccruing e0-1 Cleo timeocertificate of this agreement, of deposit shall be solely the property of depositor and the District shall ha,e no rights to any such interest. 2.3 A deed of trust with power of sale naming the District as beneficiary. 2.4 such other security as may be acceptable to the District. 2.5 The deed of trust referred to in 2.3 above if provided by Developer 'hall contain a that a Dartial reconveyance of each lot will be granted by District upon clause insuring t such jot prior to the issuance of a building permit. Said release and Developer's sale ha reconveyance shall be conditioned upon the following: in favor Of the a. The neu 'uyer shalt execute a new agreement aid deed of trust residential building Permit in an amoudt equivalent to the fee payable upon application rs froca ;he ddte of execution. .hictever :ccurs first. for a It said ne , w acres - =_n; and deed of ,rust sha ll all be due and payable at she time the build- fng permit is issued or can (ID) Ye r tb c P. kURE6 AGREEMENT 7 Z O Page 3 c. Said deed of trust shall be in the standard form and shall include a liquidated dama••e. clause providing for a penalty in addition to the amounts due and owing of a sum determiuid by multiplying the amount due by ha: (2) in the event that a residential structure is cor- at: - ted on said WL secured by ;aid 4,ed of trust without having first paid all sums dm ;,•,• !,.,;able on construction in accmnlance with the preceding subparagraph 2.5 (h). d. Said new agreNuent and deed of trust shall provide for attorney's fees incurred in enfi, imd the provisions of said agreement and deed of trust. `e: Said new agreement and deed of test shall allow prepayment at any time without any pen- alty and shail alloy for assumption by subsequent purchasers upon notice of said assumption .to District. 2:3 :n the event that lots are sold and partial reconveyances granted on condition of a ne,v agreement and deed of trust as set forth in 2.5 above, prior to the issuance of a building permit, District agrees to and shall subordinate its security interest in each such lot, if any, to any purchase money and /or construction deed of trust executed by subsequent buyers in favor of a federally insured bank, savings and loan association or other similarly quali- fied lending institution provided, however, that there shall be no subordination of security interest to a construction deed of trust unless the District is provided by the construction lender with a set aside or commitment letter quaranteeing payment of the fees due hereunder at the time the building permit is issued. r >. a. No purchase money andior construction deed of trust placed upon aay portion of said prop- erty shall exceed eighty percent (13M) of the anticipated value of said property after coin - oletion of the improvements thereon that such purchase money and /or construction deed of trust was obtained to finance. b. the difference between the anticipated value of such property after the conclusion of the improvements tP.ereon and said purchase money and /or construction deed of trust shall be greater than or equal to the amounts due and owing per lot under this Agreement at the time of subordination. District further agrees to execute any specific subordination agreement complying with the provision set forth herein as may be required by a lending institution described above. 3. Upon delivery to District of (i) a surety bond as called for in subparagraph 2.1 hereof. or (ii) a time certificate of deposit as called for in subparagraph 2.2 hereof, or (iii) a deed of trust as called for in 2.3 hereof, or (iv) such other security provided in subpara- graph 2.4 hereof, District will give written assurance to the City Council (or Planning Com- mission) of the CO''nty of San Diego that school facilities znd services will be available to meet the needs of the future residents of the proposed development. 4. In the event there should occur a denial cf Developer's request to the Count,- of San Diego _,T for the Development, all obligations hereunder sEa71 teminate and the u'istrict shaIT AM fn tea (10) days after written notice to District by Developer, deliver to Developer neces• :ary docments for releasing the security provided to District pursuant to paragraph 2 hereof. 5. Ary notice from one party to the other shall be in writing, and shall ue dated aed sinned by the party giving such notice or by a duly authorized representative cf sucn party. Any such notice shall not be effective for any purpose whatsoe.er unless served in cne of the following manners: r IV , �D s ��4L_ 721 SLCUREt1 AGREEMENT Page 4 5.: if notice is given to the District, by personal delivery thereof to the District or h: depositing the same in the United Stales nail, addressed to the District at the address forth herein, enclosed in a sealed an-111011e addressed to the District for attention of th•. .. i �.ttendeuh.. Pustage. prepaid am[ rcrtif icJ. L` notice is given to Developer. by personal delivery thereof to Developer or by del- - ina the sanv . in toe United States nvlil. enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to Devele, th+ address cot forth herein or at such other address a s may have been design ted. post !.repaid and certified. 5.3 if notice is given to a surety or other person, by personal delivery to such surety or Other person or by depositing the same in the United States mail, enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to such surety or person at the address at which such surety or person last corew- nicated to the party giving notice, postage prepaid and certified. 6. This agreement shall b, binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of, and shall apply to the :-espective successors and assigns of Developer and the District and references to Developer of the District herein shall be deemed to be reference to and include their respec- tive successors and assigns without specific mention of such successors and assigns. if Developer should cease to have any interest in the Property, all obligations of Developer hereunder shall terminate; provided however that any successor of Developer's interest in the Property shall have first assumed in writing the Developer's obligations hereunder and small have complied with paragraph 2 hereof. 111 A1T!ESS HHEREOF, this agreement is executed in San Diego County, California, as of the date first written above. DISTRICT: SAN DIEGUITO Ut110'4 RICH SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SAtI D[E CCUt:;'f, CALIFORNIA___ BY o HOi1j2�p F1'iE'.'l1•)� AUTFORIZED BY THE GOVEPIMIG SOARD: FV: UADY 5 1981 DEVELOPER: Pacifica Development Corporation I BY TITLE Pre ent - -- BY TI FOOTIIOTES: This forn should not be used except when the Developer is the leysl owner er the agent for the le-:al ovmer of tl:e property 11) Full inroe.stien crncerciny 1!1%! :!•r:e ir,t er sr:oula he set out here. aqd the name should to identical ;o that c ;ed ty the NevelSper 'n !toldinq title to the probe r[y. (2) insert tte r..::ber of reeidentiai units to be constructed. (3) .he propcs -! torn of t'}'A nr ti�.�e cer":tt'- 't�men dep(,sit assm1eu tna'ter%e- tondeoricerltifi- District ic.re tha !' °relc per sins ti is - d . cafe will �istri .t o-:nen later 1: verc d. ra l c v cg.m t r=na, M nLL % a i LL. 019 4140` t:�.=- wuy•y -tru 11:1uuM; reye ter. b6Rt Oy WAY MN-C rA :La rjP L. '!•S!)•:. L:TA E. gACLEf_. pAOrA beams mw ar 'Owat' for and Y awaMrdao a • r d on doss ey olr Mhmm.aumaAr 9u114.e0m04, hn14 adow molt e` 'W ae mw IN ms sr Mica F f s Swap • mmrWm 10 � and NEWNa Mdh" W W -WOMW Ifild 10104 mww r pmd.m • same wrmms #VAk rssYdrm aaaondlm and msls a r. -d rip and w mamma rs Mw Smim as mApew tr w In ori. mama, me 011 wanedfin, r Ymin r ss ad W w owsw mead dmerq amt •A and maw 00 bodnow baaw 0141e d wa a am Ymdr and +hadm r Our am aw r baaha Yes anamm em amr r r `, adabor da de .Me At tiw mean a.s en. Orwms Y ad Wd ay Afft m •R .w V face Y Owns V draws Y mr acv a t., Nam — sW A CdNWWL all sous w1. m % OneO.t r Yww Lacs $ and 6 to Mari A. torether vlth the Perth 20.0 fast of Saafafd Suet (Saki Sorb P.0 rest now Cloud to p.4ltc vac) all in North Lemmas. according to lay tAe »of 6e. 5A. filed in the offlct or the 2oewder of amid f.1m1y of San Dleao. w� rib 49 ax is Yr Wmil gab"" L "m 0"M slYg� Aal yr am" r cam rr at V weer &made rd Y Ge,,esatag at tam leslareat eeerar of said Yerh n; Imams Parth Tae 17' 30' Zest. along do Southerly lima tkoreof 110.0 fact; thence Send 150 Ol' 70• MA". 20.0 rout to A peat en A 21" parallel rttk and 2J.J fiat Soitbwll from the Southerly Lim or Said Black 4; laslape Barth 7N 17, )0' Best, along said parallel lino. 227.36 feet to the true point or baBl.SILog of eaid came Him of right of +tr; thane from sold tree paint of beBimidg. Barth 150 Ise )0' :YSt, 262.0 test. ■ Y a omen we aaaae ter owe amam r at a.r.w na oa em. T"Im _.�... a .sdw dw e mar r � r son* m r aver r earwrs..e Swung r our ovawa r naaa w e1.m.dam r r4 r Peat no, One se mans r M r as Me we an am mew M Me.tme, No des 4aot of l+r+ cart s4. pm+a1 me Z& W .' "Y-- !_.n_i OfAerm cmcsn fT1t`__ uz M 110AC -63Z Sent By FIRST AMERICAN TITLE; 6192314694; Aug 9 -00 11:11AM; 'yrrM way Y vwp / rwwl w / •�� .w rrr.y � • wmrir ww.w! �� w Awm •'P•rW r+ w ti w rm!\..wr w" 7mWmw Vow w rwm"• wmwr7 r N ..w ^1--Nmq w wwm w r".w we r•!•wrw! w w r,'w.wr - -� w s � r r••w -- - A •w"w— 4►'T"P r•!rw r• An* ler w w rm \ r"v A-m r 1— r�•a wear aouwmr� 1 so ssVa ..,' O7• Im rs 4 �. r.rr M I 7waft met" se - -w wtm w— wf' we w w mw\..w. 41 r• t-wmw \a• w w wmpr- -iarrw ww"-ew"/ ON w w " w mw\ A% . �!g %7 AnwoC r.mrw r^.r rr r.. rwTTww w 4w �m 1Ay /•r 4m0 r� w r\ pw \ w1 •wow w i wvopr• MEMO T1.3 uw now avasKSo � wrrmpwr2�rw \�` mwr• mrwwvw\rrmrrw pm r+1r• An POW r• ww r w -m-" MR r vm"1A mm11& Y w+ w .a w•o• w+r rdom►.w• -,$r- r•. •m• ." .w rw wmr 'am""\ rmw. rw sms w OF rr a. ----mow m•"" -�..r w"• w r --\ . a" 4p • ___� rw w•r& ------ Y Per 4m "rwm rw r4y�4!'Pow wl"m\ r rm M..O No w1 rw w or" own . �Aw- —w ro do saw" w�oA aorta W � �yS Page 517 �S q. Big m d r 7'� gg old .OIL 5 a �dso Il.ilnR [IiA Z� w+rr"•srw 1 ..,' O7• Im rs 4 �. r.rr M I 7waft met" se - -w wtm w— wf' we w w mw\..w. 41 r• t-wmw \a• w w wmpr- -iarrw ww"-ew"/ ON w w " w mw\ A% . �!g %7 AnwoC r.mrw r^.r rr r.. rwTTww w 4w �m 1Ay /•r 4m0 r� w r\ pw \ w1 •wow w i wvopr• MEMO T1.3 uw now avasKSo � wrrmpwr2�rw \�` mwr• mrwwvw\rrmrrw pm r+1r• An POW r• ww r w -m-" MR r vm"1A mm11& Y w+ w .a w•o• w+r rdom►.w• -,$r- r•. •m• ." .w rw wmr 'am""\ rmw. rw sms w OF rr a. ----mow m•"" -�..r w"• w r --\ . a" 4p • ___� rw w•r& ------ Y Per 4m "rwm rw r4y�4!'Pow wl"m\ r rm M..O No w1 rw w or" own . �Aw- —w ro do saw" w�oA aorta W � �yS Page 517 12:26P First American TitlaJanis :Inv 1 1 538 M�� .wt/e_M OF i.A4 klI = . ` .,. l�t'�6ie7i 1Ra 9alllst A. Swulm—_� .S aeial r Vveer! br'srf \ aea�ia of pa s. dd ,Oer Dd. W eam eabe mu!# W b brow Sure b do 6 Dka Ove iwb Oa7.an�. a .DPrefl•a b rs red ■dr, avr.e.arr sired m 'Pry.' M rbr e.am ...1 v68a. a mft a ,..,ra.•z esrr.®ej. Raft% , eeel.d&S a.IhFMIVk6 er aiaL V an eriir d I�aera� a! deslrV d L eG erT� eeaewed Jawt> a fre • Pea ..H a4.. eeraa.dd a.a.ee and ed ....e sf d P-7w aaa aeaegn a rat sera W sear fi~v, tr ae b = _raft. iw.1016 10001110 Ape e/ bP"ee veer e* W eCee 0"'fi � V d Jana W aea seer e.d as ay Preare. Ind A.a V ad Cams of ___ baa miksa_ -- tea ed C.Umat•. u,d rare pr60.Lrb da.v2.d as bL ^.. That eartalm yortoo of Lot 11, i5lock 22 of North Uycadla, as pet aap thereof ho. 524 tiled !a the office of the Secorder of said County of Ban DieSo, erg the'. cartalm po: tim of former Snefa Avac rtvertiry to the above ientioned yortioD of Lot 11 by virtue of the cLAiug of 1631 avam:e by order of te. board of ouj e: 1,crr, a acid Cnaaty of San Diesel, all " deaertbed la Deed recorded to Bock 28,2 at ?ass 143, Official F.eeorde of &aid County of San D1eso- Th. ram. d .Je use 1 R•r•. sad r✓ure am '. u.d .bp b. 6.0 feet of the above described property. DEC 1 12000 The r,.,. k ebo D -. T p.naA J,. r1eM n trhe .rp rw a:c�a ..r[ 1u. d Nr•e .aL .Aru .'brTR eee.leerd t: Ir n.r<..nt• ft, the proi.r .aer.dra ud d� d fM .{[ts m..r anntd �! lu 7tnvss lhrrrof. the Oream._._-- ..- -._._. saaa•e.d rao. Greamre ew ! /L?[_do e1,lll�l2fif�Y.- U.�i k..rmd b w. P .. d, ('1901 ai�g kOpLR tm � %A �t7 w1fil KO S / tX� �• P.03 RT 0 co m c Ln m F- c M u L--, tL1 N 0 0 I I 0 1 molmisom A ■ I a! I J, I I t�� "j•fii At S d. 0 RIGHT OF W 4 WL111mm A. Berle& VA" 1. Bftr� TO SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY A 3 30568 Docufluff MO.... .. — WcDk%o at at"' U" :.,' SIM om &4 1 UUTRIC CO. MAN 33 1952 t)jjfd9 SECCODS So DKmw ca"ry. ceoxm Dec-04- L 1 12a25P Fitt Aertaef-7can TitleJanis 613 1538 P 78 T,tnNQ TRD171 arID Or TAM i PtR raltAOa[ t++a• ` .. R. 1f•ae Mr4a[• Ootp•ar. • oat nor•itoo, does asrea} 1 Qaat. at.tgm ." eraar o, ao ,mmvtaa iiaak.tt ad Bolen Y. Croom, aornet spa dan{ht.r, as .loin Ynsau •11 er 1ra 1•a�r:f.A� S.k.rUL oslar apt o.ruln Deed of Trust ate opted Srptrtar 21, 19ll tI NW - f• ffinas.t.aMN end Illttle L. 4OBaeuBaf4. as TTUatnr-, to union Till* user. aa• er QaeR C>4a1. • oecp.r*atoa, sa Trus%ee, aM ra.otded eegeeree Rat} . aat.adta O"C%or 1•tO. =i: Am at Palo -- of Official Rocor Oe, to Lae orrt. � et she CO UOt} peso hear aG ]b 93ya .sent /, hell Zar BSe{ WsetB er •SN the proataeo T} note raur.d by eaii Dovd or �. ash also •11 ri4BU omrud or V ...rue under geld Deed or Trust. IR aITaot WMZMpL Rea erjazatt.2 has eauead this Inatru .t to i 7 Rn I is ;prmL4rt aaa asst• at Its Corporst• 9e81 to be stored here b. q q OF 04traar. :9.7• �� DEL Z 1 2000 N, ., m,,� t. 11. fRAffiF1 I0RTOA0T. C.OIDAAT f rR6sat a niN;+ BEWII i ampye= Er tree Seadt. 'Y OF ENCINITA y ti L-= -FE& by 0. LLLAIR[ � 4s't• It or atarr '$TAT1 or ailf.raaa i -e007" or ?a &i e. 1 >a- on this !fu Ka e2 sit -yea:. v:]s Defer• Re, Rae. Cheaaarlala, a btor} PUBlie Is end fart said Case" e.d tea.. s�a�all} epMarad N. R. }rte. r, kno•a ter to be the Rea heat, arJ [• R. Alla1`+. rm•'�n to as to a• the A.Jt. 9r er at err of the said to CarparA lea Yt ed •w 1a sth� e w �¢i j( as alc re 4eaaeaa e•r of Cor Pn etion Admiral. . na tad eotn. lodged to ag tLt aN1 LZ- rrszYCi •related the aru. Rcla cnlmmU a yea fburr Puhllo la ma for ..sod C.,Pt} add 4t•N. s. R[CO� ; r 'l.ZD. = -J :.'Li Ala? 6. :P O'Sf CO- JOT 14 1917 7 A.Y. 1.00 A Rf54Ct 16 11.O19. OJOMT RQaR= 67Aa By ULcOT'f B. aIRTA.S. ymn�rx4aOnm 9mmrd5YJms0>o za>ih <. WWII Drlm CCAPORATTOR [n67 TteRT at %W!N= W]f Or PABADAA, a sorporrtloe, ors.dlad and utet ins uadar the I.. OF a e ftl0ta s4 '.f.lfornte. Sn cone orsaioe of 'a le�'- a 1% in Bend �a14, the neelps of •filch to neraa) acBnn•- Abuse, doer t•r.a. IAav -• •Z:ir a Batl'aR' .� a'AP'T :. BA M. bomb." am •ife, •. :etas ue.aa all that errpart7 •a tin. �s�r ear Bas DSr6o, Stet• of falllorole, de.orllad as: LLI cf Iota ° sod r ors F•..cos of lots 7. e, 9 rBn L to B1ook 3L to4o%htr •lN por Heu ct Sa 'M R t vast baeL ♦same, sa en 1O 9tre4% eM Aaae•y rra .eased end aloaad to t.1114 lae r ►+.O r -r. 1915 by order o, Beard of Bup•r.lsore of the . CO" Or 40"aaat -11-P -1 " some a.e 9 Y• a tertlrled .97 of etoB sold order rs redords4 Itlaeaaa.r 26. :ale to B...rs y0-, lnp lay of Dead', la the orfire of the racordsr of 9se �aatuq�l -MVmea•6.•t- lwsw'�'ryatif •rder -eo° rtkad--. Dlado C--tr, •11 "Ina In storm i•a =. •Sa• Stole of Callfoanl., •oder41ng to estp thereof Re. SCI if11d is ta. aft+ •v %he raero or ct said Dan Diego CumtP April 6, 1064. d.sariBed a. ,• a,46 so feller: L:eatlY n tea northeast for Bar of the lem Terse t° noBart D. porr..14 Ida 1"ra• 1, : a r rdod April 11. 1975 in the offloa of the noorder of Sad p1s0 Cows}— y.acl t<oaB.e.terif along the eu t•rl} soles of tea lade[ so Loaapad M rwrs, tR.t -!t a polat to a line parallel via Ina aoutB.rl} liars of l 0 -00 12:26P First American TitleJanis 858 613 1538 5s � !lot. 7 ,d 6 ado diatent *autAarl, 20 feet therefrne 'house north- -s.Arl, -lone said parallel line LA6 Not to Ito point Of letnrm6ttn0 wltk ins Ol Dt•r line of X)g*ts ATOW41 %hands north- •t-rly -1054 'Old omtet line of N,geta Avenue 459.6 fast to the aOMQ*Plt corner of tna lead coonyed to Assert Ilayd wsaatsn by does raeorded in goat $46 fade 92 in the office of the recorder of mid San LSe Ro Cooay, CelifOrni.A' tbaOce southwesterly along its southerly ltr of the lend " 0, ovefod to Wastrem (eaiu Uns Delp{ also the septsrly prolarautloo of too Oormmly 1104 Of the lead conv -10 to Sear") 456 feet to the ptlnt of b.dlanln4. RrHF.*a70 .0 entmaht Ind rLEot of 'ay for the lb-te11a1102 and m- lfl"rACU of vet-r pipe line over the northerly •even feet of the bO14 dfsarlb d property St1 WT TO: 1, A11 gecusl son *bealol t"ee. If env, of r,c Orn, 2. All tu*e, wesesenents Ind /Or homed lndebtedo la levies by SOD Dlsdulto Irrigation Distrt -t; 3• rcrfetture of title if Int"Joating liquor- era vended C.D. or *old on said practice, " provided by deaf- Of fecofd, IN WITWS WHM07. %n• above Mentioned corporation ha- "weed this dead to to duly e Waauted and Its corporate men@ to be subadrlbed kor4to by Its Vice Praaldant sad otteRted by its "@!*tent 9edr.tsrp, who pee hereunto erfi"d 1t. corporate ..I. ttlm gah d'1 of Sopt*mber, 1941• 7 PST TRODT TIRDT TRU7f A10 SAVINGS BANE 07 PASADENA AND SAV IfWM• WE 07 By CTN2L BIMCM PAWMA. stn. Praeld*s. IRC(p POIUTID Attest: D. B. WTWWOP N SEPT. 14. 1901 As adetant Secretary. L1.S.o. SAX Lm 194)." Series 1941 Sartee 1942 $.T�LO..__•'• s,TA ?.Do. d•TA T•CO. OCT le 1947 OCT Ls. 19L3 OCT 1s 194) STATE OF Ckl-L7R%N. ) ^AT_IILlir- -.CALL Wa D ' CAXCCLmn C"I of LOS ANIEIES 3't. — l)..—. —.. •. 11. we on %hie a-,o day oI September. 19431 before a*, Merger-% S. Ott'. a Not-r7 rublld In and for said County, p. smelly appeared Cyril Rabn.tt known to be to be toe floe President, and n.. M. t*ryy Whoop 'open to a4 m d air A*ei.unt Secretary or 2TAST T, !P' Arm sAV-AW BANE OF PASAWFA. the snrparatlan ins% Raeuted too within tortrdasv- tonac to a- to be the pme>" Or* ueoutaa the wltojh lost,ogact on bebelf of the corporation thereln named, and eekepwledges %n n- that @ueb mrporatlon etecutea the eau.. ��. "ITNLIO 9 hobs end ."Lc1a1 seal. MAW"ET B. OTIS. MA10AM S. OT1ti. Notary Public 10 cad fro Yid County sad But-. My Comalulon maim- On%. 17. 1945• RECONVYD AT DRQOCST 07 3=[Z RA TI:1_E A 1RD9r CO. OCT 18 1947 at 9 A.M. 1.1D /6 RMIR W. HOME, COOHTT RECar(DRS 6717 RT tRPOTT D. COLT. kOrOII)IDIDIDS02or0MJxOrOl01OW1DrOx L NOTICK or SAID 07 ITOCL IN Knx Nouns is hereby given parmatt to the proalsions of 5aatloO )LLD Of =0 Civil ''40 of the Stet* of rAllfornte, test Ian Backe intends w 2011 to Tan Wt1111a* ell %brc 00"sin personal property consisting go,s T�ily or fixture- and 4qulpwent of a certAID bu-Inme, known a Feet San Diego Clefts" Delon Sing to mid Ioe pmts sad lecat-d at 4029 43rd Street. City or Son Dt"o, Co,,ty of Sao DIaB, state Or C*llforote. and tn-t th- purohess prima tbm-of will be paid on Loaded. the 25 %b day of Catotar. 1941. .% IW2 let A -.we, City of Dan Diego Court, Of Men Mace. state of Colllornla, a% 10 o'clock A.M. That the address of Acid .m.r 1. 4079 Ord Street, City of sac Dlap County of San us" Dtet. of California. sae the address or mid voodoo 1* 1725 W.etin &0ue4 Street City Of San Dl. ,., Co vtty of son Dl.p. Btete or Callfdr N-. DATED Ontobu 10, 194), IM BAR= T.adOr TOM WILLIAM Tmnd,, I I 1 1 1 P.02 r • .. Nam •. 4%0"9 4 . t)aropn LI.0o0 'u .2 rr0 •2."040 •Q•Q Ja .•rM.a .. �Ml (1011 war 1 sa"d one t ago K ►1,a 'as MI 'M tort eertdaa 1411s.Iraa AS •"teteytte0 Is a11N 401•ia fws /Q ' w Je 21 "00 M nl DWS n atlallAAM'G'V 'rlitra falls rnnJi/rN ■tH, r�. . AK rn Ives I"{stJJa 4 MatJJW PWa /"Wl b aer etreasl .soli iwSrt • R •eeMre . a" a►aaaa oan eta SrNtea lirWSW alll � tog" M pr►aarrs Aan $on $eat 10 /iN n MMw.wr� sM�rQ .NH •NrNQ Nw H {t�sr 'irsrs ►s.I WNW 1M t{HY .N ► m vw v1, rn K M oil N req ATiwa•6a .4g, al al2sOff"O"KestaaawtA f � osafty, w� aw N eR Yes 'SSSJNitsO tQ • oso" App " 14 �Iet eH neieH NMet� f '2"wrasN{ /tote en ht�swNjMw 1M r also Is a $00"00 ="a so '�anlo61�$ 111 =14sl -*par /r ASMAD iPtea so so; "M R ettgia AasMQ • 'nyioY'a'a •w ar0ysa 3L[i{ 'Q'p s►eaaap pe A9 nK am 1,w •se( uo are l0 J♦rw (pi112a a" b SA" "OA aosasta 070 M p•lag0 saptQis 'a LUMOa as h •'1,!Q wesAY al OWNS) •■ real SO ef0110Ja 10 ism •AIK '►oWasa f je NwaAd sin ■t Merest Js Asp net nn '02"6.34 wen eetaoesa eaal 040101,20 0%0 'JN2ett seaas{Q R 1 'w10sA AtrJ►l nAIJ 098 1 Jo ame pw /1OTlerlde aseaJd on As; AA"eoree at A1, PO4ayarrr ssssras eNla laM as"d JO w{I Dlso x001" atilt Aw .tot 04 as 1,"I SRI MowsQ Agos" hate at 1,ewer0 ou sseJ MISaI1Q asi 0 @92 *raw** foe) AeJitt ana1iQ .__. ___..__.... n.. rrf .aer.taa/Ia e1JoQ 1 10 12043 I0'Mel !nui ?1,f P/1, 041 lax e.1, 1,e. �ieerup- �tslJ� AseseJ Para is wit Naaw .r1, nie�sJ ITS"Aran±N of; O t1 n*04 n tw NO QASK anti lira •((n) �a"i� s•1 Ptaa j yo oats itsesarn2ea a" Is Destaasrtesd A1aNraelt"aP ela w staled • *9 *201111110111 tY.i10f "•' K Tiste pwt AN aNJw assts par sated $0 Nit !Kea 30 nrA ASIA •.Qrto "sm Jo A1s*o0 PaN rH le a200IJAOdN if ""@ Na is sW0 at ss v 91" to anew q•f[y en as NutA fQ 'OM "a0 Jr ASW40 ►Ae •n K rNrAprf�Oaorr K1 le 0-111.0 • wspnVAL a i . r' Jee+sl► 1,r ,w N �1t1►Pw ores n ��t (n) a l0 Met tf/aeepi} { s) /•peNwJ p �stR -AUt�t AlS!orwnaN K1�e M..Sat.aa ,w 1rn� r3 pea /t) s01Q sM4 1eawngs we 1"POP -eP Alnimt►asd arw we - 01 —J1190 )a new•6aw We ys 131IS•0 M as eswate are J s�2neet0 tit oeelw we sear 'Ntt pis, arts pee at raiarel► wwas We seersn aasA111 ' • rHSSaees n we Asy armeflaJ Sena sea saws• I1, !Oil •R HM rMaQn 'nY AM vw oWns".+e •ef"+aerWe ••1,J sNsrl am Anweaw M pr WaeaM woodor oath aAw ►olod J• sett • iaaaw poweWaas sposauld Its ass gas 401101,44,4610 )e "st latirsal/ M 'H rl1,atooee27 0ll N) 'aeioa pea 2e16192r {N 'JIelp"d04 'aetlSodoa 'QOlaoa+taow •aet►eaas 'Heald J• outialad as* eewMeo '14ftA M e'aeraeaa. ►n veil" anywl04p Y�aNe •..;, pea arNNwr as$ 'ee14e2"A" • •ASedwo 61211,04110 It 9a0 Po1"nlpes00 sa1,1a 5" M N i1 •r $Doss ..or sip 'peslaeas ealu snu we 4sllsa •s0 Jr Was on H aa1►el•s1•sos of POP I �.t soy o'ansoa0. ass Mttse JnJeoialot 's•P"" •a Atsr+40 Pas 04149 '0 Silse •aa tl11N.'1N3 j0 .11q Iva s0 "Ole ,14,35 ]NItl33Nl'JN3 ^Z// 1, � —• --a 0- -- 6 W3%1 j AIZ l Z 33a A$raaQ AQ 00411 p «•. 0 •0 6eMU 11POlgoaa 20111100 e 5 A. t a6 sia tz •sat p ' ►sp eefglJOQ ys � pepaNar `:f S 'R •16" 008104, emission" An Issertl0 ( /IMS If new sas1 r ore Jr Marro M n�+ "Teed QJr ed A= &K \WrWOi4✓✓✓ O '"TSJSytlep is etel/1Q: ffw i0 Lif1M alp r /11112 'asts►aa As 1,p 111 stn r saelol n asaas � ,tiwx i Afic, .von• i r nn.a.frnw -« n.,,m.n '11.11 Aro TU V 1QUTJ •40 111WQ 1-ilul � 7 -10 LICENSE SURVEY MAP as G , Fiank Y. Norris, V. R. Waite and Evart T. McMahan SCALE 1--W - – — — ------------- — – ------ – — ------------- .... Gk ew'INIT --------------- R tc 3 $1 VC Ile � 01, - -- - -- ------------ zF7 177., I - --------- --------- ------- - --------------- A A V 4 w a ws Va' 0 Recording Requested By and When Recorded Main To: Deborah Cervone City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas. CA 92024 For the Benefit of the City 4 -IJ -o,;?, DRAFT Space Above for Recorder's Use Only 1: 7;1Irkyi 1 :111ZRIZI &i1:111! 1r_[e7NAA&IA011111 (Vulcan /Sanford Park) This Reimbursement Agreement is entered into this day of April, 2002, by and between the City of Encinitas, a California municipal corporation (herein "City ") and Greystone Homes, a Delaware corporation (herein "Greystone "). City and Greystone are hereinafter sometimes referred to collectively as "Parties. RECITALS A. Greystone has secured approval of Tentative Map No. 98 -240 ( "TM 98- 240 ") and Final Map No. 14225 ( "FM 14225 ") from City to construct 46 residential units within the City. B. Greystone has agreed to enter into a reimbursement agreement with City for TM 98 -240 wherein condition SCA 1 of City Council Resolution No. 2000 -62 requires Greystone to construct an approximately 2.5 acre park on Lots 47 and 48 of FM 14225 at the western most portion of the project site ( "Park "). C. City has agreed to reimburse Greystone for the Actual Design and Construction Costs of the Park on Lots 47 & 48, excepting biofilter & drainage facilities associated with the residential portion of FM 14225 and landscaping facilities associated with those facilities. D. As a requirement of the City, Greystone has expended significant funds toward the planning and design of the Park including, but not limited to, the costs associated with planning, engineering, and landscape design services, community workshops and presentations, Park & Recreation Commission, City Council & Planning Commission hearings, major use permit application & processing, legal fees, and various City fees. E. Greystone is prepared to obtain and City will use its best efforts to process expeditiously applications for all necessary permits, including building permits, public improvement permits, and/or land development permits, for the construction of the Park. Greystone is willing to complete the Park according to plans approved by City. F. City's responsibility to reimburse Greystone is limited to those fees, charges and costs directly related to design and construction of the Park, pursuant to Condition SCA of City Council Resolution No. 2000 -62 (TM 98 -240) and Planning Commission Resolution No. PC 2001 -15 (MUP 01 -033). G. City's responsibility to reimburse Greystone also includes sidewalks and the undergrounding of public utilities as specified in Condition SCA 6b. of City Council Resolution No. 2000 -62 (TM 98 -240). H. Greystone is entering into this Agreement on condition that City accept this Agreement as complete satisfaction of Greystone's obligations under Condition No. SCA of TM 98 -240. I. City and Greystone have entered into a Right of Entry Agreement which authorizes Greystone and its contractors to enter its property to construct and maintain (for a limited period of time) the Park. NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Design of Improvements 1.1 As a part of TM 98 -240, MUP 01 -033 and FM 14225, Greystone agrees to construct an approximately 2.5 acre Park on property under the ownership and control of City. The Park will consist of those improvements as set forth on City Drawing No. , ( "Improvements "). Plans and Specifications shall be prepared by Greystone, subject to final written approval of City's Community Services Director. 1.2 The plans and specifications for the improvements shall comply with the construction standards in effect when the City issues its permits. 2. Construction 2.1 Timing. Greystone shall begin seeking contractors within thirty (30) days after the issuance of all necessary permits and approvals. Greystone shall solicit bids from contractors for construction of the improvements and shall provide a minimum of three bids to the City's Community Services Director for review. The Community Services Director shall review all bids submitted by Greystone and shall select the contractor to which the contract for construction of the improvements shall be awarded. Upon Greystone's receipt of written notification of the Community Services Director's selection, Greystone shall thereafter use due diligence to enter into contracts and prosecute the work to completion. Construction of the improvements shall be completed within a reasonable period of time after issuance of permits. 2.2 Construction Standards. Construction of the Improvements shall be accomplished in a good and workmanlike manner, free of liens and in compliance with the approved plans and specifications and written approval by the Community Services Director. 2.3 City Processing. The City shall use its best efforts to timely inspect the Improvements as specified in the Improvement Inspection Checklist prepared by City, attached hereto as Exhibit "A ", and shall use its best efforts to provide timely notification to Greystone of any required changes. re�hang f ccations. 2.4 Acceptance and Maintenance. Greystone or City shall record a Notice of Completion immediately upon substantial completion of the Improvements. If construction has conformed to the plans and specifcationsa City shall accept the ml- 5,Vv1 ac 60,uF Improvements within thirty -five (35) days ( "Establishment Period ") afterrewrdafiep of the Netiee of tion. Greystone shall be entitled to fence the Park to preclude public use during the Establishment Period. The completed Improvements shall be free and clear of liens and encumbrances, except those non - monetary encumbrances and easements which City reasonably determines will not interfere with the intended use of the Improvements. Following the City's acceptance of the Improvements, Greystone shall maintain the improvements for an additional fifty -five (55Ldays ( "Maintenance Period "). —� �X� i7�li/�j 'r7,) ��5 3. Actual Design and Construction Cost. The actual design and construction cost shall include, as hereinafter provided, Improvement Costs, costs of Change Orders, and Other Cost Increases defined below (collectively "Actual Design and Construction Costs "). 3.1 Improvement Costs. The Improvement Costs include, but shall not be limited to: costs of preparing the Park Project budget; costs associated with preparation and presentation of park project concept plans for two Community Workshops (10/30/00 and 11/27/00) and a Park and Recreation Commission meeting (12/12/00), as well as a City Council meeting (1/17/01) for approval of a concept plan, preparation of a major use permit application and processing of same, including a Planning Commission hearing (2/22/01); costs associated with the construction, landscaping, improvement, and final grading of the Park site; costs of professional services for design, engineering, landscape and construction of the Park and its required facilities; legal services associated with the Park project including document preparation, attendance at meetings /hearings, and representation; costs attributable to the provision of public water and sewer facilities to serve the Park project from the closest public point of connection; insurance premiums, bonds, and all other fees and charges (e.g., permit fees, inspection fees, etc.) associated with permit processing and actual construction of the project; costs attributable to provision of mitigation for impacts to resources affected by site development of the Park property and Greystone's Project administration and construction management costs not to exceed ten percent (10 %) of all approved Improvement Costs (collectively "Improvement Costs "), A preliminary estimate of the 1P C' "Improvement Costs" is attached hereto as Exhibit "B ". 511 VIP 3.2 Change Orders. A "Change Order" is a written order, approved by the City in writing, from any Greystone authorized representative ( "Greystone's Project Manager ") to the contractor performing the work authorizing a change in the work to be performed. Change Orders may be needed where changes in the Park project are made necessary due to unanticipated conditions arising during construction or changes in the plans and specifications after construction begins. City must approve all Change Orders in writing and deliver such Change Order to Greystone's Project Manager. 3.3 Approval of Change Orders. Greystone's Project Manager shall notify City's Project Manager of the need for a Change Order and City's Project Manager shall either approve or reject said Change Order within five (5) working days of receiving a written notice from Greystone's Project Manager. The notice submitted by Greystone's Project Manager must be accompanied by proper backup documentation justifying the need for the Change Order. Only the Community Services Director or his designee may approve Change Orders, and any such approval must be in writing. City's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. City shall exercise good faith, and best efforts to grant approval(s) promptly. Should the City fail to respond to the request for a Change Order from Greystone's Project Manager within the prescribed period of time, following proper notice by Greystone's Project Manager, the Change Order request shall be deemed denied by the City. For purposes of notification with regard to Change Orders, the City's Project Manager shall mean the person responsible for overseeing Project design and construction. 3.4 Minor Changes. Notwithstanding the above, Greystone shall have the authority, without City's consent, to order minor changes in the work which do not cost more than $500 per change, and do not lengthen the Park project's construction period. Greystone shall, within 24 hours prior to implementation of any such change, notify the City's Project Manager (or Supervisor if Project Manager is not available) of the nature and cost of the change. The total amount of minor changes permitted pursuant to this Section shall not exceed $5,000 without City's prior written approval. 3.5 Other Cost Increases. Notwithstanding anything herein which may provide to the contrary, the Parties acknowledge that the Total Project Cost and the Estimated Total Project Cost may be increased as a result of events occurring outside of the control of the Parties, including (i) actual bids received exceeding the Estimated Design and Construction Cost; (ii) acts of God, acts of any governmental authority, the elements, war, litigation, shortages of material, labor strikes, inflation, later commonly accepted or adopted higher standards and specifications of construction, concealed or unknovgn conditions encountered in the completion of the Project, or other cause beyond Greystone's control, (iii) Improvement Costs being greater than estimated, or (iv) other factors not the result of unreasonable conduct by Greystone. The Estimated Total Project Cost may be increased by the amount of such increases, subject to written approval by City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 4. Reimbursement. City shall reimburse Greystone one - hundred percent (100 %) of the costs of the Actual Design and Construction Costs, except as limited by Section 4.4 of this Agreement, not to exceed the estimated cost of ($ ) plus Change Orders pursuant to Paragraphs 3.3 and 3.4, as the amount reimbursed for performing its obligations hereunder, in accordance with the time schedule set forth in Section 4.1 of this Agreement. 4.1 Timing of Reimbursements. Reimbursements shall be made according to the following reimbursement schedule: 4.2 Phase 1 Reimbursements. City shall reimburse Greystone for all Phase 1 Reimbursements no later than 30 days following execution of this Agreement. Phase 1 Reimbursements shall include: costs of preparing the Project budget, costs associated with preparation and presentation of park concept plans for two Community Workshops (10/30 /00 and 11/27/00), a Park and Recreation Commission meeting (12/12/00), and a City Council meeting (1/17/01) for approval of a concept plan; preparation of a major use permit application and processing of same, including a Planning Commission hearing (2/22/01), legal services associated with the Park project including document preparation, attendance at meetings, and representation; and costs of professional services for design, engineering, landscaping and construction of the Park and its required facilities. 4.3 Phase 2 Reimbursements. City shall reimburse Greystone for 90% of all Phase 2 Reimbursements upon substantial completion of the improvements and shall reimburse Greystone for the remaining 10% of all Phase 2 improvements no later than 35 days following substantial completion of the improvement. Phase 2 Reimbursements shall include all Actual Design and Construction Costs not previously reimbursed under Section 4.2 of this Agreement, including, but not limited to: costs associated with the construction, landscaping, improvement, rough grading and final grading of the Park site; costs attributable to the provision of public water and sewer facilities to serve only the Park project and Park related facilities from the closest public point of connection; insurance premiums, bonds, and all other fees and charges (e.g., permit fees, inspection fees, etc.) associated with permit processing and actual construction of the project; costs attributable to provision of mitigation for impacts to resources affected by site development of the Park property; Greystone's Project administration and construction management costs not to exceed ten percent (10 %) of all approved Improvement Costs, Change Orders, Minor Changes, and Other Cost Increases. 4.4 Reimbursement under Section 4.1 of this Agreement is limited to that portion of the Actual Design and Improvement Costs that Greystone would not otherwise be required to spend had construction of the Park not been required by the City. Therefore, the design and construction costs for the following items shall not be reimbursable under Section 4.1 of this Agreement: (a) Greystone's pro rata share of the design and improvement costs associated with a storm water detention basin located on Lot 47 of the Final Map attributable to Lots 1 through 46 of the Final Map (estimated at $ ). However, Greystone shall be reimbursed for the City's pro rata share of the design and improvement costs associated with the storm water detention basin attributable to Lots 47 and 48 the Final Map, for the costs associated with the construction of the volleyball court at the bottom of the detention basin, and for costs associated with the construction of sidewalks and the undergrounding of public utilities as specified in Condition SCA 6b of TM 98 -240. (b) Construction costs associated with a biofilter facilities located on Lot 47 of the Final Map as well as landscaping directly above and covering said biofilter facilities. 5. Satisfaction of Greystone's Obligations. Compliance with this Agreement shall satisfy all of Greystone's obligations relating to the Improvements. 6. Assignment. Greystone may assign its rights and transfer its obligations hereunder only with the City's express, written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Immediately upon the granting of such consent, Greystone shall be released from all liability and obligations hereunder. 7. Indemnity- Subject to Sections 7.1 and 7.2 below, Greystone shall defend, indemnify, and hold City and its elected officials, agents, officers and employees (together, "Indemnitees ") harmless from and against any and all claims, costs, damages, demands, expenses, and liability arising from the performance of this Agreement by Greystone or its agents, officers or employees. 7.1 Exception: Indemnitee's fault. Section shall not apply to the extent the matter arises from the negligence of intentional misconduct of any Indemnitee. 7.2 Termination of Duty. Section 7 shall terminate upon City's acceptance of the Improvements. 8. Attorney's Fees. The prevailing party in any action or proceeding, including but not limited to arbitration, writ petitions, complaints for damages, and complaints for declaratory relief, arising from this Agreement shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees (including out -of- pocket expenses of attorneys and experts) and costs incurred therein. 9. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for this Agreement and of all provisions hereof. 10. Notices. All demands and notices required hereby shall be written, and shall be effective (i) immediately upon personal delivery, (ii) on the third business day after mailing by certified or registered U.S. Mail, return receipt requested, or (iii) on the business day after mailing by Express Mail or after deposit with a private delivery service of general use (e.g., Federal Express) postage or fee prepaid as appropriate, addressed as shown below: If to City: David Wigginton, Community Services Director City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 If to Greystone: Greystone Homes Attn: Mike Levesque, President 5780 Fleet Street, Ste. 300 Carlsbad, CA 92008 11. Integration. The undersigned, and each of them, acknowledge and represent that no promise or inducement not expressed in this Agreement has been made in connection with this Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties as to the subject matter of this Agreement. 12. Waiver and Amendment. No provision of this Agreement, or breach of any provision, can be waived except in writing. Waiver of any provision or breach shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other provision, or of any subsequent breach of the same or other provision. This Agreement may be amended, modified or rescinded only in a writing signed by all Parties to this Agreement. 13. Additional Documents. The Parties shall sign any additional documents which are reasonably necessary to carry out this Agreement or to accomplish its intent. 14. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is invalidated, the remainder of this Agreement shall terminate if the invalidated provision was a material part of the consideration for either party. 15. Entire Agreement. This Reimbursement Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the Parties and supercedes all previous negotiations between them pertaining to the subject matter thereof. In Witness Whereof, these Parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year shown below: Date: City of Encinitas 0 Kerry Miller, City Manager Date: Greystone Homes, Inc., a Delaware Corporation By: _ Title: ►_1%NIl City Clerk To: City of Encinitas 505 S Vulcan Encinitas, Ca 92024 Attn: Duane Thompson San Diego Division LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL From: Bill Golden Date: 8 )an 2002 Reference: Bay Laurel Permission to Grade Pad Certs Transmitted via: ❑ Mail ❑ Pick Up ❑ UPS / Fed Ex ® Messenger / Courier ❑ Hand delivered No. of Copies Description 1 Permission to Grade; Lisa Lafferty 1 Permission to Grade; Bill and Sally Hall 1 Pad Certifications Transmitted for your: ® Action ❑ File / Information ❑ Signature ❑ For Review and Comment Remarks: submittal for Phase 11 and III for building permits Bill Golden Project Manager (760)- 918 -7718 file 5780 Fleet Street, Suite 300, Carlsbad, California 92008 * Phone: (760) 804-7700 * Fax(760)804-7717 * (: \G\wpd \ops \donna \Forms \transmittal.aoc ❑ Per Your Request Cc: SBDecember 28, 2001 II n O Job No. 57143.00 L�yVj�•J CITY OF ENCINITAS SB &O, INC. Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 RE: Bay Laurel - Phase II Engineer's Pad Certification for TM No. 98 -240 Grading Permit No. 6775 -G Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, DA5714211.TRSaG PAD CERT PHASE 2A.DOC Corporate Office: 3615 Kcarny Villa Road Suite 201• San Diego. CA 92123 ♦ Phone (8581 560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -9157 91X17 Arrow Route, Suite 120 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ♦ Phone (9()9) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue. Suite 201 ♦ Temecula. CA 925911 ♦ Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909) 693 -3320 Pursuant to Section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for Lots 20 -35 and 40. As the Lund Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading for Planning these units has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. 23.24.3 10 (B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Lot No. Pad Elevation per Plan As -built Pad Elevation 20 70.6 70.6 21 72.9 72.9 22 76.5 76.5 Civil 23 81.8 81.8 Engineering 24 87.5 87.5 25 94.8 94.8 26 95.2 95.2 27 96.5 96.5 28 97.9 97.9 29 96.5 96.5 30 95.0 95.0 31 94.5 94.5 32 94.9 94.9 33 96.0 96.0 34 97.0 97.0 Land surveying 35 97.5 97.5 40 71.0 71.0 Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, DA5714211.TRSaG PAD CERT PHASE 2A.DOC Corporate Office: 3615 Kcarny Villa Road Suite 201• San Diego. CA 92123 ♦ Phone (8581 560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -9157 91X17 Arrow Route, Suite 120 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ♦ Phone (9()9) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue. Suite 201 ♦ Temecula. CA 925911 ♦ Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909) 693 -3320 SBSB&O, fNC. & 0 Michael S. Butcher S SB &O, INC. Vice President ((O,� Lang! Planning Civil Engineering Lana .SutIvYing MSB:ama cc: Bill Golden/Greystone Homes. Mike Steele /Greystone Homes/site fax 760 - 634 -7666 D:\571421LTRSIRG PAD CERT PHASE 2A.DOC OFC Corporate Office: 3615 Kcarn} Villa Road Suite 2014 San Ditto. (A 42123 ♦ Phone (858) 560 -1141 Fax (8581 560- %157 9(8)7 Arrow Route, Suite 120 ♦ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ♦ Phone (909( 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 JetTerson .Axenue. Suite 201 ♦ Temecula. CA 92590 ♦ Phone (409) 693 -3310 Fax (`H)9) 693 -3320 o+ COA CRETF COLLAR AD? 0-62 c� PTP£ TO Q'mmei CYJMA+EC OV AER S R'SO D-7d -- - v :0) 1P i I � .0f TP 7' G4 $ 8E L - Le - r +- ° P1'410TFC7 . / *49.77, 1147' Or 80 ._ TYPE 'C —f' GIL71 54SYV 2 � � G O � � n n � N LA. NI ,( F` .L 5 A- -; (\ r, .0 u) 43C Exp. l�yo�yy 9 Vdlm P�r��fl CAI,L Cxu.1o►�S, m 4 • CIS F • i o �•�� a¢`1= �1 i °FaLt, 61-1 6 1 -s "e14 a, a , CA\— �—\.LK—n =s%Epm-e T'DQ.Ca is ,5+k��.��1 +ri C6aLLSc.J C.�/.� CA�G.�l.�a1Jn� So, \N D�lz i s M-u� c`t�l= IcJ�t MArG H ACA oCu L,�" a� S 4 -r:��4,-rLCALC CA,- L�.�s s-w essli�� Ti-) 6�0 : ra• c F ro -77 n!G r NCrEAO "'licsrR oz... 01 . IUJ-.IJ,UDIJY uUL'CU'JI 1. , !•,J- I Gaotechnlcal • Geologic • Environmental 5741 Pahrer Way Carlsbad, CalOOrr.ia 92000 • (760j 438 -3155 • FAX (760) 931-0915 July 20, 2001 Greystone Homes 5780 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Chris Earl W.O. 2391 -A•SC Subject: Response to Plan Check Comments Regarding Cantilever -Sheet Pile Retaining Wals, Bay Laurel Project on Vulcan Avenue, City of Encinitas, San Diego County, California Refarences 1j 'Preliminary Gawechnical Eveluation, 11.8 Acre Encinitas Property Located at Northeast Intersection of Sanford Road and Vulcan Avenue, City of Encinitas, California,' W.O. 2391-A.1-SC. dated April 2, 1998, by GeoS011s, Inc. 2) 'Structural Review Comments, Greystone -Say Laurel Retaining Walls (99- 240)," file # A2001 -017, undated, by SMR Structural Englneera, Inc. Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, Geo5oils, Inc. (GSI) has reviewed the referenced plan check comments regarding the geotechnical aspects of design and construction for the proposed cantievered sheet pile retaining wall(s) at the subject s 1e. Cur review responses are provided as follows. Response to Item #1 Design parameters provided in reference #1 are considered valid and applicable with respect to design and construction of the subject wall(s). Response to Item #3to Item #3 Earthquake loads presented in reference #1 are provided for use at the discretion of the structural engineer and in accordance with any applicable buliding codes. beNi bV! UCUbulLb, INU.i 'nv"dlu`13i UUVCU -UI 14'. , '.RUC 0'a Response to Item #4 The values provided for restrained conditions at the corners of a cantilevered wall were provided for use in lieu of any rigorous analysis by the structural engineer for this condition. Design values provided for this condition may be used at the discretion of the structural engineer, based on hls/her intorpretatlon and analysts. LIMITATIONS The conclusion and recommendations presented heroin are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time, GSI assumes no responsibility for work, testing or recommendations performed or provided by others. The opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated do not hesitate to call our office. — '_- Respectfully submi�` =t'te Q'F GeoSolls, Inc. e , t 3ti r' fi0 erf G. srffa Engineering Geologist, CEG 1934 RGC /ARK/EPL/JPF/ h If you have any 4. pppFE3 No 476 /� d+ Exp.06 -30 -06 `. � qj �'rFr}tt ^AI Albert . Kleist - -- Geotechnical Engineer, GE 476 Distribution; (2) Addressee (2) Horowitz Taylor Engineering, Attn: Mr. Serhat Sergin Greyetorio Homes Bay Laurel, Vulcan Avenue, Encln'tas Pike 1wp712300%2391arep GeoSolls, Inc. J. 2391 -A-SC July 2U, 2001 Page 2 Structural Engineers, Inc. Job: Greystone —Bay Laurel Retaining Walls (99 -240) Job #A2001 -017 Structural Review Comments 1)1 Confirm with soils engineer that the pressures given in the soils report apply to cantilever sheet — pile retaining walls (not just traditional retaining walls). 2) Supply portions of soil report that give the allowable soil bearing pressure, allowable passive pressure, maximum allowable passive pressure, and minimum footing width. 3) Earthquake loads on the soil due to acceleration of backfill do not appear to be included in the design per page 20 of the soils report. 4) IncIreased equivalent fluid density at the corner of the wall does not appear to be addressed in the calculations (per page 20 of the soils report)- 5) Provide calculation for 25 psf wind /seismic force added to stem. 6) Provide calculation for moment development across masonry /concrete interface. 7) See calculations for additional comments. i JUL 2 3 2001 3569 Fifth Avenue, Suite 100 • San Diego, CA 92103 . Tel: (619) 294 -6600 . Fax (619) 294 -6800 admin@smr- eng.com L I �# HOROI%ITZ TAYLOR ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL 6 CIVIL CONSULTING STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PROJECT: B A`r L- ALt,t2e 4 y 7— WA k-5 - / r 3I aM CONCRETE STRENGTH AT TWENTY EIGHT DAYS: 25--00 PSI MASONRY: GRADE "N" CQNCRETE BLOCK F - M = � SQ 0 PSI MORTAR: TYPE S 1800 PSI r GROUT: 2000 PSI REINFORCING STEEL: A -615' STRUCTURAL STEEL: A -36 LUMBER: DOUGLAS FIR -LARCH JOISTS BEAMS AND POSTS STUDS SEISMIC FORCE: WIND FORCE: DESIGN LOADS: ROOF DEAD LOAD SLOPING FAT ROOFING PLYWOOD JOISTS INSUL. k CLG. MISC. TOTAL = ROOF LIVE LOAD SLOPING FLAT GRADE 40: #5 AND LESS (U.O.N.) GRADE 60: k6 AND LARGER K2 K2 STUD OR BETTER r^— REPORT BY: COV 501 G1S 0 - - - -- REPORT NO: W D Z 30.1 /-A- J.SGSOIL PRESSURE: SR� FLOOR DEAD LOAD WALL DEPJ LOAD INT. EXT_ FLOORING INTERIOR 10 PSF PLYWOOD EXTERIOR 16 PSF JOISTS INSUL. 3 CLG MISC. TOTAL = FLOOR LIVE LOAD RFJUL 2 3 2001 LINTERIOR 40 PSF BALCONY 60 PSF (U.O.N.) EXIT WALKWAY 100 PSF These calculations are limited only to the items included herein, selected by the client and do not imply approval of any other portion of the structure by this office. These calculations are not valid if altered in any way, or not accompanied by a wet stamp and signature of the nF Rr�nnl — o - ��ii1 �.x ^edtBy� F- zJob,I�ocslgn 3 a - - ��CD e vJP 1 3 �X \ 0 7c�,3 Of rz. f ( - y� �. o CG = ,3x0,41 = a. S�2 1.0 xo s12ocl'��I+ 0 >W� O10�W� 3,a J 1125 S �.E�7 °� W w V PAULTIA L- FP o .-2-9 x � 3 = 21 , z 4.1 x/ il, fit.. 10'94 =0 �s , -7 ' -4" AL4 L O . Z9' WF. —5g+!s 75@ F, C. YAAu 6 ;U+VWW U PPP @ b. bx4= 2,4' "Q) 7o P a r2� �, t,� I �4 . 4' W k, X1.2 �sL- 4' -TOA o� CoNc{l�� z,q � 4o e64-- 3 sx4 y LeIA y = �L �X C ► .Z x 6.6'1 + -40,x 1.6 + 4 ? •o = 4 t35 MoM�IT 21.2 x 6X6-7 40 z+ �4,D �t �" = l 6 Is � A�.,Vm'oN/,4L. c5G�S-Mlc, t N Gk4&"Vql'-PiV Ea, 067-A+#4 Q�2 51g�Z-4�- - 6 @ 6 X0,6 = -1, c 'ice'1-09 C ar4 61 60 f 4- V 2i Z. 6.6-7 +- 21.4- 4 21a x 6 6,607 ( 6,67/2 +6 ) + 60kz•gf C2'` Z t3,6J 1 40 U x,0;3' 2 � • Z�sL r VJ 4k-�, 73.3 61' F�CS wl'u. PIC 2 56.(. eS� = 7Z .2.k6,61 + —73.3x2• ( 4- 2 $6,6x7.33 2 I - Zy G� 6 '67/2 r -� , 3 3� + -7 3 .3x2.9 C-2,9 /-a + 0 Job # Date: 11:46AM, 12 JUL 01 Page 1 General Information Total Moment To specify your title block on Title these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Description selection on the main menu and Req'd Depth enter your title block Information Scope will be printed on each page. 485.00 Ibs U9✓'5100 1196. Ver 51.3. 23dw1999. W,n32 6" 51030° Pole Embedment in Soil (c) 196399 MN LC distance from base Description Circilar pole with Point & Uniform Loads Pole is Rectangular Job # Date: 11:46AM, 12 JUL 01 Page 1 General Information Total Moment 0.00 1 Allow Passive 300.00 pcf Applied Loads... Req'd Depth Max Passive 3,000.00 Psf Point Load 485.00 Ibs Load duration factor 1.330 distance from base 3.300 ft Pole is Rectangular Width 12.000 in Distributed Load 0.00 #/ft No Surface Restraint distance to lop 3.000 ft distance to bottom 0.000 ft Moments @ Surface... Point load Distributed load Without Surface Restraint... Required Depth Press @ 1/3 Embed... Actual Allowable 1,600.50 ft-# Total Moment 0.00 Total Lateral With Surface Restraint... 3.450 ft Req'd Depth Pressure @ Base... 476.58 psf Actual 458.83 psf Allowable Surface Restraint Force 1,600.50 ft-# 485.00 Ibs 0.000 ft To specify your title block on Title : Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Dale: 11:46AM, 12 JUL 01 Description selection on the main menu and enter your title block Information Scope will be printed on each page. _ Rev: 510300 Pole Embedment in Soil Page 1 1111. —10ZO 355. Ver S.1.3, 2 ?JUn1999. W in32 mJ lys3.y3 rrJrRCac r \ec \bav lau reLecw:Calculations Description Circilar pole with Point & Uniform Loads General Information Max Passive Load duration factor Pole is Rectangular Width No Surface Restraint Moments @ Surface... Point load Distributed load Without Surface Restraint... Required Depth Press @ 113 Embed... Actual Allowable 300.00 pcf 3,000.00 Psf 1.330 12.000 in 5,046.60 ft-# 0.00 5.350 ft 720.42 psf 711.50 psf Point Load distance from base Distributed Load distance to tap distance to bottom Total Moment Total Lateral With Surface Restraint... Req'd Depth Pressure @ Base... Actual Allowable Surface Restraint Force 1,294.00 Ibs 3.900 It 0.00 #/ft 3.000 ft 0.000 It 5,046.60 ft-# 1,294.00 Ibs 0.000 ft 511dmy Pe5tromt P�437.5# El To specify your title block on Title: these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Description selection on the main menu and enter your title block Information Scope: will be printed on each page. 22J.n 1999. W..32 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design 8 cmu stem design -4ft masx ret Criteria Design Summa Retained Height = 4.00 ft Wall height above soil = 6.67 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 0.00 In Soil Density = 110.00 psf Wind on Stem = 21.2 psf Lateral Load Applied to Stem Design Summa Wall Stability Ratios Total Bearing Load = 1,267 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 16.09 in Resultant Exceeds Fig. Width! Soil Pressure @ Toe = 0 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 0 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 2.1 psi OK Fooling Shear @ Heel = 4.7 psi OK Allowable = 93.1 psi Wall Stability Ratios Heel Active Pressure Overturning = 0.80 UN Sliding = Passive Pressure Sliding Calks Slab Resists All Sliding I Lateral Sliding Force = 642.9 lbs Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 0.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 ft FootingIISoii Fricliol = 0.300 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 0.00 in Lateral Load = 40.0 #/ft Job # Date: 11:26AM, 12 JUL 01 Page 1 Footing Strengths & Dimensions fc = 3,000 psi Fy = 60.000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 1.00 ft Heel Width = 1.00 Total Footing Width =- Fooling Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 0.001n Key Depth = 0.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.00 R Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in ...Height to Top = 4.00 it ...Height to Bodom = 2.40 ft Stem Construction Top Stem 2nd 3rd Heel Factored Pressure Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK Design height ft= 4.00 0.50 0.00 Wall Material Above "Ht" = Masonry Masonry Masonry Thickness = 8.00 8.00 8.00 Debar Size = # 5 # 7 # 5 Debar Spacing = 24.00 24.00 24.00 Debar Placed at = Center Edge Edge Design Data fb 1F8 + fa /Fa = 0.655 0.907 0.829 Total Force @ Section Ibis = 141.4 419.8 485.4 Moment.... Actual ft-#= 471.6 1,389.4 1,615.3 Moment..... Allowable ft-#= 719.7 1,531.5 1,949.3 Shear..... Actual psi = 4.9 7.6 8.5 cha =, n9.w.ahlo nsl= 25.8 25.6 51.5 J I HDLG! 0.59 UNSTABLE! Footing Desi n Results psf= 58.0 To Heel Factored Pressure = 0 0 psf Mu': Upward = 0 0 ft-# Mu' : Downward = 143 172 ft-# Mu: Design = 143 172 ft-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 2.06 4.73 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 93.11 93.11 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd = Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd In Key Reinforcing = None Spedd Concrete Data Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in = 30.00 Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Ht. in = 30.00 Wall Weight psf= 58.0 Rebar Depth 'd' In = 3.81 Masonry Data fm Psi= 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = No Special Inspection = No Modular Ratio'n' = 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.330 Equiv. Solid Thick. In 5.20 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc Psi = Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sites & Spacings Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S - Fr Key: No key defined 42.00 30.00 42.00 6.00 78.0 78.0 5.25 5.25 1,500 24.000 Yes No 25.78 1.330 7.60 1,500 24,000 Yes Yes 25.78 1.330 7.60 To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each page. Rev 510300 UFO', KW 0601355, Ver 5 1.3, 22 Jur 1999. W,132 VGi.00 iNFPf.AI C Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope: Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Description 8 cmu stem design -oft masx ret Job # Date: 11:26AM, 12 JUL 01 Page 2 Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments ..- OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... For.ce Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs It ft -# Ibs It ft -# H I Active Pressure = 4375 1 67 729.2 Soil Over Heel = 146.7 1.83 268.9 ee ci 0.00 Toe Active Pressure = 0.33 Surcharge Over Toe = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = 64.0 4.20 268.8 Load @ Stem Above Soil = 141.4 8.34 1,178.6 SeismicLoad = Footing Weight = Total = 642.9 O.T.M. = 2,176.6 Resisting /Overturning Ratio = 0.80 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,267.5 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Sloped Soil Over Hee' Surcharge Over Heel Adjacent Footing Load Axial Dead Load on Stem= 0.00 Soil Over Toe Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = B98.9 1.33 931.8 Earth @ Stem Transitions = Footing Weight = 300.0 1.00 300.0 Key Weight = Vert. Component _ 121.9 2.00 243.9 Total= 1,267.5 Ibs R.M.= 1,744.6 J 919.54# To specify your title block on Title these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Description selection on the main menu and 6.67 ft enter your title block information Scope: will be printed on each page. 0.00 in Job # Date: 1:51 PM, 19 JUL 01 Uses: KW 0501355. Vn 5.1.3, 21JUm1999. W,n32 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 1 (c)198395 ENERCALC c: \ec \bav Iaurel.ecw: Cal cu'bon5 Description S cmu stem design -6 ft ret Criteria = 2,000.0 psf Retained Height = 6.00 it Wall height above soil = 6.67 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 0.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem 21.2 psf Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 0.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 ft FoctingllSoil Frictiol 0300 Soil height to ignore Wall Material Above "Ht" for passive pressure 0.00 in Lateral Load Applied to Stem Lateral Load 60.0 #/ft Ain. As % Design Summary Stem Construction Top stem = 1.00 ft -leel Width = 1.00 Stem OK Total Bearing Load 1,737 Ibs Design height ft= 6.00 ._resultant ecc. 26.58 in Wall Material Above "Ht" = Masonry Resultant Exceeds Fig. Width! Thickness in= 8.00 Soil Pressure @ Toe 0 psf OK Rebar Size 3.60 ft # 5 Soil Pressure @ Heel 0 psf OK Rebar Spacing Slem OK 24.00 Allowable 2.000 psf Rebar Placed at Masonry Center Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable Design Data # 6 16.00 16.00 16.00 Edge Edge ACI Factored @ Toe 0 psf fb /FB + fa /Fa 0.655 ACI Factored @ Heel 0 psf Total Force @ Section Ibs = 141.4 Footing Shear @ Toe 1.9 psi OK Moment.... Actual ft-# = 471.6 Footing Shear @ Heel 0.0 psi OK Moment..... Allowable ft -# = 719.7 Allowable 93.1 psi Shear..... Actual psi = 4.9 Wall Stability Ratios N 1 A Shear..... Allowable psi = 25.8 Overturning 0 7$4- b;+STA8A Sliding 0,42 -kf !::E! Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in= 30.00 Sliding Calcs Slab Resists All Sliding ! Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Ht. in = 30.00 Lateral Sliding Force = 1,205.2 lbs Wall Weight psf= 58.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in = 3.81 Masonry Data I'm psi= 1,500 Fs psi= 24,000 Solid Grouting No Footing Design Results Special Inspection _ No Motlular Ration' 25.78 Toe Heel Short Term Factor 1.330 Factored Pressure 0 0 psf Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 5.20 Mu' : Upward 0 0 ft-# Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Mu' : Downward 205 0 f i Concrete Data Mu: Design 205 Oft-# fc psi= Actual 1 -Wa Shear 1 90 0 00 psi Fy psi = y Allow 1 -Way Shear = 93.11 0.00 psi Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Key: No key defined Footing Strengths & Dimensions 'c = 3,000 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Ain. As % = 0.0012 roe Width = 1.00 ft -leel Width = 1.00 Width rota) Footing Wi =Oil - roofing Thickness = 15.00 in <ey Width 0.00 in <ey Depth 0.00 in <ey Distance from Toe 0.00 ft over @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in ..Height to Top 6.00 ft ..Height to Botton 3.60 ft 2nd 3rd 4th Stem OK Stem OK Slem OK 3.33 0.00 0.00 Masonry Masonry Masonry 8.00 12.00 12.00 # 5 # 6 # 6 16.00 16.00 16.00 Edge Edge Edge 0.833 0.928 0.465 410.2 915.4 915.4 1,171.8 3,271.2 3,271.2 1,407.1 3,524.4 7,042.0 7.3 10.0 9.5 25.8 25.8 51.5 30.00 36.00 36.00 30.00 36.00 7.11 78.0 124.0 124.0 5.25 8.50 9.00 1,500 1,500 1,500 24,000 24,000 24,000 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 25.78 25.78 25.78 1.330 1.330 1.330 7.60 11.62 11.62 To specify your title block on Title : Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dscri Date: 1:51PM, 19 JUL 01 Dee scription selection on the main menu and enter your title block information Scope will be printed on each page. Re.: 5103 Page 2 uxn KwCfi21355. var 51.3,221un 1999.wm32 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design r\n� \hay.lau rel xwrCalcula[ inns Description 8 cmu stem design -6 ft ret Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs ft ft-# Ibs ft ft -# Heel Active Pressure = Toe Active Pressure = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SeismicLoad = 919.8 2.42 2,223.0 0.42 Sloped Soil Over Heel _ 144.0 6.05 871.2 141.4 10.59 1,496.8 Total = 1.205.2 O.T.M. = 4,590.9 ResistingfOverturning Ratio = 0.54 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,737.3 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Soil Over Heel = 2.00 Sloped Soil Over Heel _ Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem= 0.00 Soil Over Toe Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 11008.0 1.40 Earth @ Stem Transitions= 97.9 1.83 Footing Weight = 375.0 1.00 Key Weight = Vert. Component - 256.4 2.00 Total = 1,737.3 Ibs R.M = 1,412.9 179.5 375.0 4117 @Toe Dnigner eelect MO @O.in all hom. mn1. @ Meet 5ee Appendu A 2' -0' 1288.3# To specify your title block on Title: these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Description selection on the main menu and enter your title block information Scope : will be R 5103 on each 22J.n 1999. Wm32 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Description 8 cmu stem design -7.33 It ret Criteria Design Summary Retained Height ° 7.33 ft Wall height above soil = 6.67 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Toe = 0.00 in Sal Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem = 21.2 psf Lateral Load Applied to Stem Design Summary Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Total Bearing Load = 2,005 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 35.78 in Resultant Exceeds Ftg. Width! Soil Pressure @ Toe = 0 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 0 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 1.9 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 0.0 psi OK Allowable = 93.1 psl Wall Stability Ratios a Overturning = Rebar Size Sliding = # 5 Sliding Cates Slab Resists All Sliding ! Lateral Sliding Force = 1,645.9 lbs Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 0.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 ft FootingilSoil Frictior = 0.300 Soil height to Ignore for passive pressure = 0.00 in Lateral Load = 73.3 #/ft Job # Date: 1:49PM, 19 JUL 01 Footing Strengths & Dimensions rc = 3,000 psi Fy = 60.000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 1.00 ft Heel Width = 1.00 Total Footing Widtr = 00- Footing Thickness = 15.00 in Key Width = 0.00 in Key Depth = 0.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.00 ft Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in ...Height to Top = 7.33 ft ...Height to Bottorr = 4.38 ft Stem Construction Top stem 2nd 3rd 4th Factored Pressure = 0 Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK Design height ft= 7.33 4.67 2.00 0.00 Wall Material Above "Hr = Masonry Masonry Masonry Masonry Thickness in = 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 Rebar Size = # 5 # 5 # 6 # 6 Rebar Spacing = 24.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 Rebar Placed at = Center Edge Edge Edge Design Data fb /FB + fa/Fa = 0.655 0.865 0.035 0.765 Total Force @ Section Ibs= 141.4 460.2 854.8 1,297.9 Moment.... Actual ft-#= 471.6 1,216.8 2,942.1 5,071.5 Moment..... Allowable ft-#= 719.7 1,407.1 3,524.4 6,632.0 �CEr ��! F-Footing Design Results psf = 58.0 Toe Heel Factored Pressure = 0 0 psf Mu': Upward = 0 0 ft-# Mu': Downward = 205 0 ft-# Mu: Design = 205 0 ft-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 1.90 0.00 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 93.11 0.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Speed = Heel Reinforcing = None Speed in = Key Reinforcing = None Speed Concrete Data Shear..... Actual psi = 4.9 Shear..... Allowable psi = 25.8 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. In = 30.00 Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Hl. in = 30.00 Wall Weight psf = 58.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in= 3.81 Masonry Data I'm psi = 1.500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = No Special Inspection = No Modular Ratio'n' = 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.330 Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 520 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data rc psi = Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: Not req d, Mu < S ' Fr Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Key: No key defined 8.2 25.8 30.00 30.00 78.0 5.25 1,500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.330 7.60 9.4 25.8 36.00 36.00 124.0 8.50 1,500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.330 11.62 14.2 51.5 36.00 11.70 124.0 8.50 1,500 24,000 Yes Yes 25.78 1.330 11.62 To specify your title block on Title : Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 1:49PM, 19 JUL 01 Description selection on the main menu and enter your title block information Scope will be printed on each page. Xer_ $103 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page z ❑sec 83 960 1 3 5 5. Ver 5 L3, 22 Jun1999. Wm32 mJ t9e9.996Nracetc c \et \ba daureLecw:Cacuation Description 8 cmu stem design -7.33 ft ret Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment RARE Ibs It ft -# Ibs ft ft-# Heel Active Pressure = Toe Active Pressure = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SeismicLOad = 1,288.3 2.86 3,684.5 97.5 0.42 178.8 216.2 7.11 1,536.3 141.4 11.92 1,684.8 Total = 1,645.9 O.T.M. = 6,905.7 Resisting /Overturning Ratio = 0.42 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 2,005.0 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Soil Over Heel = Sloped Soil Over Hee: _ Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = Soil Over Toe Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) _ Earth @ Stem Transitions = Footing Weighl = Key Weight = Vert. Component _ Total = 2.00 ERE 1,173.4 1.42 1,661.1 97.5 1.83 178.8 375.0 1.00 375.0 359.1 2.00 718.1 2,005.0 Ibs R.M.= 2,933.0 7Z) r�E,l.rJ:Mr Exterior Flatwork Exterior walkways, sidewalks, or patios, using concrete slab on grade construction (excluding traffic pavements), should be designed and constructed in accordance with the following criteria. 1. Slabs should be a minimum 4 inches in thickness. A thickened edge should be considered (12 inches in depth and 4 to 6 inches in thickness) for all flatwork adjacent to landscape areas. 2. Slab subgrade should be compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction and moisture conditioned to at or above the soils optimum moisture content. 3. The use of transverse and longitudinal control joints should be considered to help control slab cracking due to concrete shrinkage or expansion. Two of the best ways to control this movement is; 1) add a sufficient amount of reinforcing steel, increasing tensile strength of the slab, and /or 2) provide an adequate amount of control and /or expansion joints to accommodate anticipated concrete shrinkage and expansion. We would suggest that the maximum control joint spacing be placed on 5 to 8 foot centers or the smallest dimension of the slab, whichever is least. 4. No traffic should be allowed upon the newly poured concrete slabs until they have been properly cured to within 75 percent of design strength. 5. Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Adjacent landscaping should be graded to drain into the street, parking area, or other approved area. All surface water should be appropriately directed to areas designed for site drainage. 6 In areas directly adjacent to a continuous source of moisture (i.e. irrigation, planters, etc.), all joints should be sealed with flexible mastic. 7. Concrete used to construct flatwork should be at least ASTM 520 -C -2500. RETAINING WALLS X General Foundations may be designed using parameters provided in the "Design" section of Foundation Recommendations presented herein. Wall sections should adhere to the County of San Diego and /or City of Carlsbad guidelines. All wall designs should be reviewed by a qualified structural engineer for structural capacity, overturning and stability. Greystone Homes W.O. 2391 -A1.SC 11.8 Acre Encinitas Property April 2, 1998 File:e \wpT23=2391 a1.age Page 18 V , 4, The design parameters provided assume that onsite or equivalent low expansive soils are used to backfill retaining walls. If expansive soils are used to backfill the proposed walls within this wedge, increased active and at -rest earth pressures will need to be utilized for retaining wall design. Heavy compaction equipment should not be used above a 1:1 projection up and away from the bottom of any wall. The following recommendations are not meant to apply to specialty walls (cribwalls, loffel, earthstone, etc.). Recommendations for specialty walls will be greater than those provided herein, and can be provided upon request. Some movement of the walls constructed should be anticipated as soil strength parameters are mobilized. This movement could cause some cracking dependent upon the materials used to construct the wall. To reduce wall cracking due to settlement, walls should be internally grouted and /or reinforced with steel. Restrained Walls Any retaining walls that will be restrained prior to placing and compacting backfill material or that have re- entrant or male corners, should be designed for an at -rest equivalent fluid pressures of 60 pcf, plus any applicable surcharge loading. For areas of male or re- entrant corners, the restrained wall design should extend a minimum distance of twice the height of the wall laterally from the corner. Building walls below grade, should be water - proofed or damp - proofed, depending on the degree of moisture protection desired. Refer to the following section for preliminary recommendations from surcharge loads. Cantilevered Walls These recommendations are for cantilevered retaining walls up to ten (10) feet high. Active earth pressure may be used for retaining wall design, provided the top of the wall is not restrained from minor deflections. An empirical equivalent fluid pressure (EFP) approach may be used to compute the horizontal pressure against the wall. Appropriate fluid unit weights are provided for specific slope gradients of the retained material. These do not include other superimposed loading conditions such as traffic, structures, seismic events or adverse geologic conditions. FACE SLOPE OF EQUIVALENT AINED MATERIAL F FLUID WEIGHT ONTAL TO VERTICAL P.C.F. native soil Level 35 2 to 1 50 e Homes 7 ncinitas Property 12391at.age GeoSoils, Inc. W.U. 2391 -Al .JG April 2, 1998 Page 19 JQ AN V� Ste, LS4� The equivalent fluid density should be increased to 65 pounds per cubic foot for level backfill at the angle point of the wall (corner or male re- entrant) and extended a minimum J lateral distance of 2H (two times the wall height) on either side of the corner. Traffic loads within a 1:1 projection up from the wall heel, due to light trucks and cars should be considered as a load of 100 psf per foot in the upper 5 feet of wall in uniform pressure. For preliminary design purposes, footing loads within a 1:1 backfill zone behind wall will be added to the walls as 1/3 of the bearing pressure for one footing width, along the wall alignment. For earthquake loads (i.e., increase in active pressure) on the retaining wall due to the acceleration of the backfill during seismic shaking, a seismic increment of 1 OH should be _i added to the active wall pressures for level backfill. This value should be added as a uniform pressure at and above a point equal to 0.61-1, where H is the height of the backfill behind the wall. For sloping backfill the seismic increment should be added as 15H for slopes up to but not exceeding 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). Wall Backfill and Dralnaae All retaining walls should be provided with an adequate gravel and pipe backdrain and outlet system (a minimum 2 outlets per wall), to prevent buildup of hydrostatic pressures and be designed in accordance with minimum standards presented herein. Pipe should consist of schedule 40 perforated PVC pipe. Gravel used in the backdrain systems should be a minimum of 3 cubic feet per lineal foot of 3/a to 11h -inch clean crushed rock encapsulated in filter fabric (Mirafi 140 or equivalent). Perforations in pipe should face down. The surface of the backfill should be sealed by pavement or the top 18 inches compacted to 90 percent relative compaction with native soil. Proper surface drainage should also be provided. As an alternative to gravel backdrains, panel drains (Miradrain 6000, Tensar, etc.) may be used. Panel drains should be installed per manufacturers guidelines. Regardless of the backdrain used, walls should be water proofed where they would impact living areas or where staining would be objectionable. Retaining Wall Footing Transitions Site walls are anticipated to be supported on footings designed in accordance with the recommendations in this report. Wall footings may transition from bedrock to fill. If this condition is present the civil designer may specify either: a) A minimum of a 2 -foot, overexcavation and recompaction of bedrock materials, as measured for a distance of two times the height of the wall from the transition in the direction of the wall. Overexcavations should be completed for a minimum lateral distance of 2 feet beyond the footing, measured perpendicular to the wall. Greystone Homes 11.8 Acre Encinitas Property File; a \wp712300\2391 al .age GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 2391 -A1.SC April 2, 1998 Page 20 b) Increase of the amount of reinforcing steel and wall detailing (i.e., expansion joints or crack control joints) such that a angular distortion of 1/360 for a distance of 2H on either side of the transition may be accommodated. Expansion joints should be sealed with a flexible grout. c) Embed the footings entirely into native formational material. If transitions from cut to fill transect the wall footing alignment at an angle of less than 45 degrees (plan view), then the designer should follow recommendation "a" (above) and until such transition is between 45 and 90 degrees to the wall alignment. TRAFFIC PAVEMENTS Preliminary Pavement Design Based on our general site observations and subsurface exploration, relatively sandy soils are anticipated to be exposed at pavement subgrade within the site. For general planning purposes, the following pavement sections are provided. a J; Portland concrete cement (PCC) driveway pavement may be constructed to a minimum thickness of 41/2 inches. All concrete pavement should be at least ASTM 520 -c -2500. Concrete should be properly detailed in accordance with current industry standards and the Uniform Building Code. Resistance value testing of actual subgrade during grading should be performed in order to confirm or redefine R- values used in this report. If testing of actual subgrade determines that the R -value is differedt than the assumed values presented herein, then the recommended pavement section must be revised. PCC pavement jcinting should be provided per county standards and no greater than 10 feet apart. ureysrone Homes 11.8 Acre Encinitas Property File *Wp71230012391 al .age GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 2391 -A1.SC April 2, 1998 Page 21 AGGREGATE A.C. BASE TRAFFIC SUBGRADE °R " - THICKNESS THICKNESS °I TRAFFIC AREA —INDEX[ z VALUE Inches Inches Cul Du Sac 4.5 27 4.0 6.0 Local Street 5.0 27 4.0 6.0 (1) Denotes Class 2Aggregate Base (R >48, SE > 22). 2 Traffic Indices selected are estimates: a J; Portland concrete cement (PCC) driveway pavement may be constructed to a minimum thickness of 41/2 inches. All concrete pavement should be at least ASTM 520 -c -2500. Concrete should be properly detailed in accordance with current industry standards and the Uniform Building Code. Resistance value testing of actual subgrade during grading should be performed in order to confirm or redefine R- values used in this report. If testing of actual subgrade determines that the R -value is differedt than the assumed values presented herein, then the recommended pavement section must be revised. PCC pavement jcinting should be provided per county standards and no greater than 10 feet apart. ureysrone Homes 11.8 Acre Encinitas Property File *Wp71230012391 al .age GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 2391 -A1.SC April 2, 1998 Page 21 r �c�, ar. ucuaui�av auu.r •oveu�uai a, �cu•ra•uu �u.u,v rnuc u , - w. Prxn ♦ i 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad. California 92008 • (760l,438-3155 • FAX(760)931 -0915 MEMORANDUM DATE: 1248.00 W.O. 2391- A.1 -SC TO: Horowitz and Taylor, attn: Canh Tran SUBJECT: Additional soil design parameters for masonry block retalning walls, Bay Laurel, Encinitas, California References. - Preliminary Geotachnical Evaluation, 11.8 Acre Encinitas Prope^.y Located at Northeast Intersection of Sanford Road and Vulcan Avenue, City of Encinitas, Cafiftmia," W.O 2391 -A- SC, dated April 2, 1998, by GeoSolls, Inc. Ris memorandum has been prepares: in order to provide revised sci� design parameters regarding the design and constructon of a masonry block retaining wall proposed along the eastern property line onaite. Recommendations presented In the referenced report remain valid and applicable unless specifically superseded in the text of this memorandum. An allowable bearing value of 2300 psf may be used for design of continuous footings 12 ;Inehas wide and embedded a mininhum of 12 inches into suitable terrace deposits. This value may to Increased by 20 percent for each additional 12 inches in depth or width to a maximum of 3000 psf. The above values may be increased by one -third when considering short duration seismic or wind loads. Passive earth pressure for terrace deposits may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 300 pcf per foot of depth with a maximum earth pressure of 3000 psf. Should you have any questions, please contact this office. Respectfully submitted, G"Solls, Inc. Distribution: Greystone Homes, Mr. Chris Earl Post -IN Fax Note 7671 or °iM it -N Y 4-is / WOW w. Prxn ♦ Phone r FY4g57-540 - L HOROWITZ TAYLOR ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL G CIVIL C0KSU LT INC STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PROJECT: B A `r L A Lt 440, 4 E5.'j— Wei 1.1-5 — /- CONCRETE STRENGTH AT TWENTY EIGHT DAYS: 2S -0o PSI MASONRY: GRADE "N" CONCRETE BLOCK F - M PSI MORTAR: TYPE S 1800 PSI GROUT: 2000 PSI REINFORCING STEEL: A-615' STRUCTURAL STEEL: A -36 LUMBER: DOUGLAS FIR —LARCH JOISTS BEAMS AND POSTS STUDS SEISMIC FORCE: _ WIND FORCE: _ DESIGN LOADS: ROOF DEAD LOAD SLOPING ELAT ROOFING PLYWOOD JOISTS INSUL. & CLG. MISC. TOTAL = SLOPING FLAT s'I GRADE 40: #5 AND LESS (U.O.N.) GRADE 60: k6 AND LARGER x2 k2 STUD OR BETTER REPORT BY: CG�! 51D]4-1S 0 REPORT NO.: W Q Z �Cq I -A — 1'2SOIL PRESSURE:'? $aa FLOOR DEAD LOAD WALL DEAD LOAD INT. FLOORING INTERIOR 10 PSF PLYWOOD EXTERIOR 16 PSF JOISTS INSUL. & CLG. MIST. 0 TOTAL = JUL 2 3 2001 FL OOR LIVE LOAD IMF RIB .. Rv 11\`TERIOR 40 PSF BALCONY 60 PSF (U.O.N.) EXIT WALKWAY 100 PSF These calculations are limited only to the items included herein, selected by the client and do not imply approval of any other portion of the structure by this office. These calculations are not valid if altered in any way, or not accompanied by a wet stamp and signature of tile g17 r =$y �'> :: r F ' z � �JobNo : - ... a 1Dcslgned Y F v . .,� tx ..:,. .Daft 00 a6,0 1 6 OR cz p c-�, S CPC 1,.r 3r a 77 cg3��%f r -� �\, 1.0 x o 5-12 oC 5TQ-e7s S o W� 1.4. R,44T+AL. fP —� 0 .29 x --72, = 21 .2 O•-zr-fW,. = 58 ± I s W- -7384-, &, C. �4mSmi r. 1 Q L�wr�`N a Pv� �[p b��5Asj A) x! P," (a x 4 1 -4u PPPvi @ Cam• bx4= 2'41 -To a-r- 9- a m in4. 0 70 p °Y Co Nc z,q � 4o Qs� 4 z ,O = G �5 6 �4� ��Z�� _ �v►s� 4 P)Tti,-)N /, k-, 5 — 6� SC -rAjG- t N C4--a" ZV17 Qgr 6x,o 'EQ f7ArAid 2�2 6o�sF 09 L, t @ T\D -10P vr4 61 G X0.6 = 7, G C= aqg-Al0Ac- mmo ll 25 a 6r67/0 t 6 60 „�Z•rf. �Z.�CrZ �,3,� y 3z:PL2 f�,. /b 2 � -2BsL 1, 33' 41-Al T3: -&II 61' -�C s Wl,:k -7 �I 21, 2 4- Z�-4,6x7,33 2 �l = 2 ( . Z>, b' , C G '67 /Z t -� . 3 3) + �3 3X2,9 CZ.9/-a i- 4-4) + . /6 ; Q- = 1''/'i = 3 - I. To specify your title block on these five lines, use the SETTINGS selection on the main menu and enter your title block information will be printed on each page. Wv 5103C0 User: KW 0601355. Ver 5.1 3. 22 Jun 1999. Win32 (0 1983 99 EnER LC Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope Pole Embedment in Soil Job # Date: 11:46AM, 12 JUL 01 Page 1 Description Circilar pole with Point & Uniform Loads 1,600.50 ft -# Total Moment General Information Distributed load 0.00 Total Lateral Allow Passive 300.00 pcf Applied Loads... Max Passive 3,000.00 Psf Point Load 485.00 Ibs Load duration factor 1.330 distance from base 3.300 ft Pole is Rectangular Actual 476.58 psf Width 12.000 in Distributed Load 0.00 #!ft No Surface Restraint distance to top 3.000 ft Surface Restraint Force distance to bottom 0.000 ft Moments @ Surface Point load 1,600.50 ft -# Total Moment 1,600.50 ft-# Distributed load 0.00 Total Lateral 485.00 Ibs Without Surface Restraint... With Surface Restraint... Required Depth 3.450 ft Req'd Depth 0.000 ft Press @ 113 Embed... Pressure @ Base... Actual 476.58 psf Actual Allowable 458.83 psf Allowable Surface Restraint Force To specify your title block on Title : Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 11:46AM, 12 JUL 01 Description selection on the main menu and enter your title block information scope will be printed on each page. Pole Embedment in Soil Page 1 Uxc xYl- 06°1355, va 5 1.3. 22JUm 1999. W�n32 (c)198399 EeEPCALC c: \ec \baV- IaureLe<w:CalCWati005 Description Circilar pole with Point & Uniform Loads General Information Total Moment 5,046.60 ft -# 1 Allow Passive 300.00 pcf Applied Loads... With Surface Restraint... Max Passive 3,000.00 Psf Point Load 1,294.00 Ibs Load duration factor 1.330 distance from base 3.900 ft Pole is Rectangular 711.50 psf Allowable Width 12.000 in Distributed Load 0.00 # /ft No Surface Restraint distance to lop 3.000 ft distance to bottom 0.000 ft Moments @ Surface... Point load Distributed load Without Surface Restraint... Required Depth Press @ 113 Embed... Actual Allowable 5,046.60 ft -# Total Moment 5,046.60 ft -# 0.00 Total Lateral 1,294.00 Ibs With Surface Restraint... 5.350 tt Req'd Depth 0.000 ft Pressure @ Base... 720.42 psf Actual 711.50 psf Allowable Surface Restraint Force PRI437.51 To specify your title block on Title: these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Description: selection on the main menu and 6.67 ft enter your title block information Scope will be printed on each page. 0.00 in R. Ul' 510300 Uvr. x1.0601353, Va S.1.3. YYJUn9999, w,n33 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design (q 196399 ERERMC 2.000 psf Description 8 cmu stem design -4fl masx ret Criteria Design Summary Retained Height 4.00 ft Wall height above soil 6.67 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00:1 Height of Soil over Toe = 0.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pct Wind on Stem = 21.2 psf Lateral Load Applied to Stem Design Summary Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Total Beadng Load = 1,267 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 16.09 in Resultant Exceeds Fig. Width! Soil Pressure @ Toe = 0 psi OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Allowable = 2.000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 0 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psi Footing Shear @ Toe = 2.1 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 4.7 psi OK Allowable = 93.1 psi Wall Stability Ratios Shear..... Allowable Overturning = 0.80 UNSTA Sliding = 0.59 UNST Sliding Calcs Slab Resists All Sliding ! Lateral Sliding Force = 642.9 lbs Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 0.0 Water height over heel 0.0 ft FoolingjjSoil Frictoi = 0.300 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 0.00 in Lateral Load = 40.0 #/ft Stem Construction fc = 3,000 psi Design height k= Wall Material Above "Ht" _ Thickness = Debar Size = Debar Spacing = Rebar Placed at = Design Data = 143 fb/FB + fa /Fa = Total Force @ Section Ibs = Moment.... Actual ft-#= Moment..... Allowable ft-#= Shear..... Actual psi = Shear..... Allowable psi = BLE. ABLE! Footing Design Results fc = 3,000 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Too Heel Factored Pressure = 0 0 psf Mu': Upward = 0 0 ft-t Mu': Downward = 143 172 ft-# Mu: Design = 143 172 ft-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 2.06 4.73 psi Allow 1•Way Shear = 93.11 93.11 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd = Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd in = Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Concrete Data Job # Date: 11:26AM, 12 JUL 01 Page 1 Footing Strengths 8 Dimensions fc = 3,000 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 1.00 ft Heel Width = 1.00 Total Footing Wldtr Masonry Footing Thickness = 12.00 in Key Width = 0.00 in Key Depth = 0.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.00 It Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in ...Height to Top = 4.00 It ...Height to Botton = 2.40 ft ,p Stem 2nd 3rd Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK 4.00 0.50 0.00 Masonry Masonry Masonry 8.00 8.00 8.00 # 5 # 7 # 5 24.00 24.00 24.00 Center Edge Edge 0.655 141.4 471.6 719.7 4.9 25.8 Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. in = 30.00 Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht. In = 30.00 Wall Weight psf= 58.0 Rebar Depth 'd' In= 3.81 Masonry Data fm psi= 1.500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = No Special Inspection = No Modular Rabo'n' = 25.78 Short Tenn Factor = 1.330 Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 520 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi = Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes 6 Spacings Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S ' Fr Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S - Fr Key: No key defined 0.907 419.8 1,389.4 1.531.5 7.6 25.8 42.00 42.00 78.0 5.25 1,500 24,000 Yes No 25.78 1.330 7.60 0.829 485.4 1,615.3 1,949.3 8.5 51.5 30.00 6.00 78.0 5.25 1,500 24,000 Yes Yes 25.78 1.330 7.60 To specify your title block on Title : Job # Descri Date: 11:26AM, 12 JUL 01 these five lines, use the SETTINGS Description selection on the main menu and enter your title block information Scope will be printed on each page. Rer:510300 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 2 Vur x10601355. Ver 51.3. YDJum 1999. Win33 (q 1983 99 ENERGLC c: \et \baN laurel eCw:Cd CUId IiO❑ Description 8 cmu stem design -4ft masx ret Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments .....RESISTING..... .....OVERTURNING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs It ft -# Ibs If ft-ft Heel Active Pressure = 437.5 1.67 729.2 Soil Over Heel = 146.7 1.83 268.9 Toe Active Pressure = 0.33 Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Toe = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = 64.0 4.20 268.8 Axial Dead Load on Stem= 0.00 Load @ Stem Above Soil = 141.4 8.34 1,178.6 Soil Over Toe = Seismicl-oad = Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 698.9 1.33 931.8 Total = 642.9 O.T.M. = 2,176.6 Earth @ Stem Transitions= ResistinglOverturning Ratio = 0.80 Footing Weighl = 300.0 1.00 300.0 Key Weight _ Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,267.5 Ibs Vert. Component _ 121.9 2.00 243.9 Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Total = 1,267.5 Ibs R.M.= 1,744.6 919 e" To specify your title block on Title : these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Description selection on the main menu and 6.67 it enter your title block information Scope will be printed on each page. 0.00 in a« slo3oo I 601354V�r5.1.3.23JUnd9 %.V/�n33 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design (c) .) 1281 1 %3� %ENEPCALC Description S anu stem design -6 ft ret Criteria Design Summary Retained Height = 6.00 It Wall height above soil = 6.67 it Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Soil over Too = 0.00 in Sol] Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem = 21.2 psi Lateral Load Applied to Stem Design Summary Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Total Bearing Load = 1,737 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 26.58 in Resultant Exceeds Fig. Width! Soil Pressure @ Toe = 0 psi OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psi OK Allowable = 2,000 psi Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 0 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 1.9 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 0.0 psi OK Allowable = 93.1 psi Wall Stability Ratios O / A Overturning = 0- Sliding = DA4-in Sliding Calks Slab Resists All Sliding I Lateral Sliding Force = 1,205.21bs Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psi Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 0.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 it FootingIlSoil Frictioi = 0.300 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 0.00 in Lateral Load = 60.0 AM Job # Date: 1:51 PM, 19 JUL 01 Page 1 Footing Strengths & Dimensions fc = 3,000 psi Fy = 60.000 psi Min. As % = 0.0012 Toe Width = 1.00 ft Heel Width = 1.00 Total Footing Width Stem OK Footing Thickness = 15.00 in Key Width = 0.00 in Key Depth = 0.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.00 ft Cover @ Top = 3.00 In @ Btm.= 3.00 in ... Height to Top = 6.00 ft --- Height to Botton = 3.60 it Stem -Construction Top Stem 2nd 3rd 4th Factored Pressure = 0 Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK Design height ft = 6.00 3.33 0.00 0.00 Wall Material Above *Ht' = Masonry Masonry Masonry Masonry Thickness in = 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 Reber Size = # 5 # 5 # 6 # 6 Reber Spacing = 24.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 Reber Placed at = Center Edge Edge Edge Design Data lb /FB +fa/Fa = 0.655 0.833 0.928 0.465 Total Force @ Section Ibs = 141.4 410.2 915.4 915.4 Moment .... Actual ft-#= 471.6 1,171.8 3,271.2 3,271.2 Moment ..... Allowable ft-#= 719.7 1,407.1 3,524.4 7,042.0 Shear ..... Actual psi = 4.9 7.3 10.0 9.5 Shear ..... Allowable psi = 25.8 25.8 25.8 51.5 a.- orrsrnvea: Footing Design Results psi = 58.0 Toe Heel Factored Pressure = 0 0 psf Mu': Upward = 0 0 ft-# Mu': Downward = 205 0 ftai Mu: Design = 205 0 ft-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 1.90 0.00 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 93.11 0.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd = Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd in = Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Concrete Data Bar Develop ABOVE Ht. In = 30.00 Bar Lap /Hook BELOW Ht. in = 30.00 Wall Weight psi = 58.0 Reber Depth 'd' in = 3.81 Masonry Data 124.0 124.0 I'm psi= 1,500 Fs psi = 24,000 Solid Grouting = No Special inspection = No Modular Ratio'n' = 25 -78 Short Term Factor = 1.330 Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 5.20 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi= Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S - Fr Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S ' Fr Key: No key defined 30.00 36.00 36.00 30.00 36.00 7.11 713.0 124.0 124.0 5.25 8.50 9.00 1,500 1,500 1,500 24,000 24,000 24,000 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 25.78 25.78 25.78 1.330 1.330 1.330 7.60 11.62 11.62 To specify your title block on Title : Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Date: 1:51 PM, 19 JUL 01 Description selection on the main menu and enter your title block Information Scope will be printed an each page. U 910300 Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 2 Ro. x1V _060135!, Vv S.1.3, 22 JUm3999, W�n32 r\n� \hay.laural wrwCalrulafinnc Description 8 cmu stem design -6 ft ret Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces 8 Moments .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs It ft-# Ibs it it-# Heel Active Pressure = 919.8 2.42 2,223.0 Soil Over Heel = 2.00 Toe Active Pressure = 0.42 Sloped Soil Over Hee' _ Surcharge Over Toe Adjacent Footing Load Added Lateral Load = 144.0 6.05 871.2 Load @ Stem Above Soil = 141.4 10.59 1,496.8 SeismicLoad Total = 1,205.2 O.T.M. = 4,590.9 ResistinglOvertuming Ratio = 0.54 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,737.3 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = Soil Over Toe Surcharge Over Toe Stem Weight(s) = 1,008.0 Earth @ Stem Transitions = 97.9 Footing Weight = 375,0 Ke Wei ht r 39 1.40 1,412.9 1.83 179.5 1.00 375.0 y 9 = Vert. Component - 256.4 2.00 512.7 Total= 1,737.3 Ibs R.M.- 2,480.1 a —1 000e...... o ... u1— ...i .c a oe ... „i.. @Toe Designer select #0 0.in @ all honz. roof. @ Heel 5ee Append,. A 2'-0 41 11 510mg F�5tramt 1286.3# To specify your title block on Title: these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dsgnr: Description selection on the main menu and 6.67 ft enter your title block information Scope: will be printed on each page. 0.00 in Job # Date: 1:49PM, 19 JUL 01 Vu 51030° Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 1 UN 510M 35, YvS1.3. t2Jom 1999. Win3P (c)195399ENE LC c Aec \bav- Iaurel.ecw:Calculations Description 8 cmu stem design -7.33 ft ret Criteria Design Summa Retained Height = 7.33 it Wall height above soil = 6.67 ft Slope Behind Wall = 0.00: 1 Height of Sal over Toe = 0.00 in Soil Density = 110.00 pcf Wind on Stem = 21.2 psf Lateral Load Applied to Stem Design Summa Fy = 60,000 psi Total Bearing Load = 2,005 ibs ...resultant ecc. = 35.78 in Resultant Exceeds Fig. Width! Soil Pressure @ Toe = 0 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 0 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 1.9 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 0.0 psi OK Allowable = 93.1 psi Wall Stability Ratios w1 4_ & Overturning = 8.00 Sliding = Ujz Fx Sliding Calcs Slab Resists All Sliding ! Lateral Sliding Force = 1,645.9 lbs (Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000.0 psi Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Fy = 60,000 psi Heel Active Pressure = 35.0 Toe Active Pressure = 0.0 Passive Pressure = 0.0 Water height over heel = 0.0 ft FootingIlSoil Frictiot = 0.300 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 0.00 in Lateral Load = 73.3 Wft Footing Strengths & Dimensions rc = 3,000 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Min. As h = 0.0012 Toe Width = 1.00 it Heel Width = 1.00 Total Footing Widtr = Footing Thickness = 15.00 in Key Width = 0.00 in Key Depth = 0.00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0.001t Cover @ Top = 3.00 in @ Btm.= 3.00 in ...Height to Top = 7.33 it ...Height to BoBoa = 4.38 ft BL-E! Footing Design Results Stem Construc I Top Stem 2nd 3rd 4th = 0 0 psf Mu' : Upward Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK Stem OK Design height ft= 7.33 4.67 2.00 0.00 Wall Material Above 'Hr = Masonry Masonry Masonry Masonry Thickness in= 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 Reber Size = # 5 # 5 # 6 # 6 Reber Spacing = 24.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 Reber Placed at = Center Edge Edge Edge Design Data fb /FB + fa /Fa = 0.655 0.1165 0.635 0.765 Total Force @ Section Ibs = 141.4 460.2 854.8 1,297.9 Moment.... Actual ft-#= 471.6 1,216.8 2,942.1 5,071.5 Moment..... Allowable ft-#= 719.7 1,407.1 3,524.4 6,632.0 Shear..... Actual psi = 4.9 8.2 9.4 14.2 Shear..... Allowable psi = 25.8 25.8 25.8 51.5 BL-E! Footing Design Results psf= 58.0 Too_ Heel Factored Pressure = 0 0 psf Mu' : Upward = 0 0 fief Mu': Downward = 205 0 ft-# Mu: Design = 205 0 ftat Actual 1 -Way Shear = 1.90 0.00 psi Allow 1•Way Shear = 93.11 0.00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spedd = Heel Reinforcing = None Spedd in = Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Concrete Data Bar Develop ABOVE HL in = 30.00 Bar lap /Hook BELOW Ht. In= 30.00 Wall Weight psf= 58.0 Rebar Depth 'd' in = 3.81 Masonry Data 124.0 124.0 I'm psi= 1,500 Fs psi= 24,000 Solid Grouting = No Special Inspection = No Modular Ration' = 25.78 Short Term Factor = 1.330 Equiv. Solid Thick. in = 5.20 Masonry Block Type = Medium Weight Concrete Data fc psi= Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes 6 Spacings Toe: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Heel: Not req'd, Mu < S' Fr Key: No key defined 30.00 36.00 36.00 30.00 36.00 11.70 78.0 124.0 124.0 5.25 8.50 8.50 1,500 1,500 1,500 24,000 24,000 24,000 Yes Yes Yes No No Yes 25.78 25.78 25.78 1.330 1.330 1.330 7.60 11.62 11.62 To specify your title block on Title: Job # these five lines, use the SETTINGS Dscri Date: 1:49PM, 19 JUL 01 Dee scription selection on the main menu and enter your title block information Scope will be printed on each page. - U MM Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Page 2 Uar IM'0601355, Ver 51.3. 22Jon3999. Wm32 (q 19l399 EnENGLC c: \tt \bav laureLecw:Calcuatiom. Description 8 cmu stem design -7.33 ft ret Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments ...- OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Hem Ibs ft ft-# Ibs It ft-# Heel Active Pressure = 1.288.3 2.86 3,684.5 Soil Over Heel = 2.00 Toe Active Pressure = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load Load @ Stem Above Soil = Seismicload = 0.42 216.2 7.11 1,536.3 141.4 11.92 1,654.8 Total = 1,645.9 O.T.M. = 6,905.7 Resisting/Overturning Ratio = 0.42 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 2,005.0 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Sloped Soil Over Heel _ Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem= Soil Over Tae Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Wel l(s) = 1.173.4 Earth @ Stem Transitions Footing Weight = 375.0 Ke Weight 0.00 1.42 1,661.1 1.83 178.8 1.00 375.0 Y = Vert. Component - 359.1 2.00 7181 Total = 2,005.0 Ibs R.M.= 2,933.0 V Ll,�orJ %�&-5 i"L - 141"'1 :ter / /-%:s -77j eel-J) I Exterior Flatwork Exterior walkways, sidewalks, or patios, using concrete slab on grade construction (excluding traffic pavements), should be designed and constructed in accordance with the following criteria. 1. Slabs should be a minimum 4 inches in thickness. A thickened edge should be considered (12 inches in depth and 4 to 6 inches in thickness) for all flatwork adjacent to landscape areas. 2. Slab subgrade should be compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction and moisture conditioned to at or above the soils optimum moisture content. 3. The use of transverse and longitudinal control joints should be considered to help control slab cracking due to concrete shrinkage or expansion. Two of the best ways to control this movement is; 1) add a sufficient amount of reinforcing steel, increasing tensile strength of the slab, and /or 2) provide an adequate amount of control and /or expansion joints to accommodate anticipated concrete shrinkage and expansion. We would suggest that the maximum control joint spacing be placed on 5 to 8 foot centers or the smallest dimension of the slab, whichever is least. 4. No traffic should be allowed upon the newly poured concrete slabs until they have been properly cured to within 75 percent of design strength. 5. Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Adjacent landscaping should be graded to drain into the street, parking area, or other approved area. All surface water should be appropriately directed to areas designed for site drainage. 6 In areas directly adjacent to a continuous source of moisture (i.e. irrigation, planters, etc.), all joints should be sealed with flexible mastic. 7. Concrete used to construct Flatwork should be at least ASTM 520 -C -2500. RETAINING WALLS General Foundations may be designed using parameters provided in the "Design" section of Foundation Recommendations presented herein. Wall sections should adhere to the County of San Diego and /or City of Carlsbad guidelines. All wall designs should be reviewed by a qualified structural engineer for structural capacity, overturning and stability. Greystone Homes 11.8 Acre Encinitas Property File: a \wp7�2300\2391 al .age W.O. 2391-Al-SC April 2, 1998 Page 18 t- The design parameters provided assume that cnsite or equivalent low expansive soils are used to backfill retaining walls. If expansive soils are used to backfill the proposed walls within this wedge, increased active and at -rest earth pressures will need to be utilized for retaining wall design. Heavy compaction equipment should not be used above a 1:1 projection up and away from the bottom of any wall. The following recommendations are not meant to apply to specialty walls (cribwalls, loffel, earthstone, etc.). Recommendations for specialty walls will be greater than those provided herein, and can be provided upon request. Some movement of the walls constructed should be anticipated as soil strength parameters are mobilized. This movement could cause some cracking dependent upon the materials used to construct the wall. To reduce wall cracking due to settlement, walls should be internally grouted and /or reinforced with steel. Restrained Walls Any retaining walls that will be restrained prior to placing and compacting backfill material or that have re- entrant or male corners, should be designed for an at -rest equivalent fluid pressures of 60 pcf, plus any applicable surcharge loading. For areas of male or re- entrant corners, the restrained wall design should extend a minimum distance of twice the height of the wall laterally from the corner. Building walls below grade, should be water - proofed or damp - proofed, depending on the degree of moisture protection desired. Refer to the following section for preliminary recommendations from surcharge loads. Cantilevered Walls These recommendations are for cantilevered retaining walls up to ten (10) feet high. Active earth pressure may be used for retaining wall design, provided the top of the wall is not restrained from minor deflections. An empirical equivalent fluid pressure (EFP) approach may be used to compute the horizontal pressure against the wall. Appropriate fluid unit weights are provided for specific slope gradients of the retained material. These do not include other superimposed loading conditions such as traffic, structures, seismic events or adverse geologic conditions. SURFACE SLOPE OF EQUIVALENT RETAINED MATERIAL FLUID WEIGHT HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL P.C.F. native soil Level 35 2 to 1 50 ,e Homes ncinitas Property 12391 at.age GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 2391 -At .SU April 2, 1998 Page 19 The equivalent fluid density should be increased to 65 pounds per cubic foot for level J backfill at the angle point of the wall (corner or male re- entrant) and extended a minimum j lateral distance of 2H (two times the wall height) on either side of the corner. Traffic loads within a 1:1 projection up from the wall heel, due to light trucks and cars should be considered as a load of 100 psf per foot in the upper 5 feet of wall in uniform pressure. For preliminary design purposes, footing loads within a 1:1 backfill zone behind wall will be added to the walls as 1/3 of the bearing pressure for one footing width, along the wall alignment. For earthquake loads (i.e., increase in active pressure) on the retaining wall due to the acceleration of the backfill during seismic shaking, a seismic increment of 1 OH should be `I added to the active wall pressures for level backfill. This value should be added as a uniform pressure at and above a point equal to 0.61-1, where H is the height of the backfill behind the wall. For sloping backfill the seismic increment should be added as 15H for slopes up to but not exceeding 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). Wall Backfill and Drainage All retaining walls should be provided with an adequate gravel and pipe backdrain and outlet system (a minimum 2 outlets per wall), to prevent buildup of hydrostatic pressures and be designed in accordance with minimum standards presented herein. Pipe should consist of schedule 40 perforated PVC pipe. Gravel used in the backdrain systems should be a minimum of 3 cubic feet per lineal foot of 3/e to 11/2 -inch clean crushed rock encapsulated in filter fabric (Mirafi 140 or equivalent). Perforations in pipe should face down. The surface of the backfill should be sealed by pavement or the top 18 inches compacted to 90 percent relative compaction with native soil. Proper surface drainage should also be provided. As an alternative to gravel backdrains, panel drains (Miradrain 6000, Tensar, etc.) may be used. Panel drains should be installed per manufacturers guidelines. Regardless of the backdrain used, walls should be water proofed where they would impact living areas or where staining would be objectionable. Retaining Wall Footing Transitions Site walls are anticipated to be supported on footings designed in accordance with the recommendations in this report. Wall footings may transition from bedrock to fill. If this condition is present the civil designer may specify either: a) A minimum of a 2 -foot, overexcavation and recompaction of bedrock materials, as measured for a distance of two times the height of the wall from the transition in the direction of the wall. Overexcavations should be completed for a minimum lateral distance of 2 feet beyond the footing, measured perpendicular to the wall. Greystone Homes 11.8 Acre Encinitas Property File: e\wp71230012391 al .age GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 2391 -A1.SC April 2, 1998 Page 20 1N b) Increase of the amount of reinforcing steel and wall detailing (i.e., expansion joints or crack control joints) such that a angular distortion of 1/360 for a distance of 2H on either side of the transition may be accommodated. Expansion joints should be sealed with a flexible grout. C) Embed the footings entirely into native formational material. If transitions from cut to fill transect the wall footing alignment at an angle of less than 45 degrees (plan view), then the designer should follow recommendation "a" (above) and until such transition is between 45 and 90 degrees to the wall alignment. TRAFFIC PAVEMENTS Preliminary Pavement Design Based on our general site observations and subsurface exploration, relatively sandy soils are anticipated to be exposed at pavement subgrade within the site. For general planning purposes, the following pavement sections are provided. 1. Portland concrete cement (PCC) driveway pavement may be constructed to a minimum thickness of 41/2 inches. All concrete pavement should be at least ASTM 520 -c -2500. Concrete should be properly det$iled in accordance with current industry standards and the Uniform Building Code. Resistance value testing of actual subgrade during grading should be performed in order to confirm or redefine R- values used in this report. If testing of actual subgrade determines that the R -value is different than the assumed values presented herein, then the recommended pavement section must be revised. PCC pavement jcinting should be provided per county standards and no greater than 10 feet apart. ureystone Homes 11.8 Acre Encinitas Property Fi1e:e \wp7\2300\2391 al .age Geosoils, Inc. W .O. 2391 -A l . SC April 2, 1998 Page 21 AGGREGATE A.C. BASE TRAFFIC SUBGRADE "R ". THICKNESS THICKNESS " TRAFFIC AREA INDEX1 �1 VALUE Inches inches Cul Du Sac 4.5 27 4.0 6.0 Local Street 5.0 1 27. \, 4.0 6.0 (1) Denotes Class 2 Aggregate Base (R >,` 8, SE > 22). 2 Traffic Indices selected are estimates, 1. Portland concrete cement (PCC) driveway pavement may be constructed to a minimum thickness of 41/2 inches. All concrete pavement should be at least ASTM 520 -c -2500. Concrete should be properly det$iled in accordance with current industry standards and the Uniform Building Code. Resistance value testing of actual subgrade during grading should be performed in order to confirm or redefine R- values used in this report. If testing of actual subgrade determines that the R -value is different than the assumed values presented herein, then the recommended pavement section must be revised. PCC pavement jcinting should be provided per county standards and no greater than 10 feet apart. ureystone Homes 11.8 Acre Encinitas Property Fi1e:e \wp7\2300\2391 al .age Geosoils, Inc. W .O. 2391 -A l . SC April 2, 1998 Page 21 OEM or: utUOULLe, Lnu.i a 1111111-0 .WO .utl, D, utu-,G- o.P', 1— 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad. California 92008 • (760)438.3155 • FAX(760)931.0915 MEMORANDUM DATE: 12 -15.00 W.O. 2391- A.1 -SC TO: Horowitz and Taylor, attl Carlin Tran SUBJECT: Additional soil design parameters for masonry block retaining walls, Bay Laurel, Encinitas, California References. 'Preliminary Geatechnical Evaluation, 11.8 Acre Encinitas Property Located at Northeast Intersection of Sanford Road and Vulcan Avenue, City of Encinitas, California,' W.O. 2391 -A- SC, dated April 2, 1990, by GeoSoils. Inc. This memorandum has been prepared in orderto provide revised soil design parameters regarding the 6411 and construction of a masonry block retaining wall proposed along the eastern property line onsits. Recommendations presented In the referenced report remain valid and applicable unless specifically suparceded in the text of this memorandum An allowable bearing value of 2500 psf may be used for design of continuous footings 12 inches wide and embedded a minimum of 12 inches into suitable terrace deposits. This value may be increased by 20 percent for each additional 12 Inches in depth or width to a maximum of 3000 psf. The above values may be irlcreaaed by one -third when considering short duration seismic or wind loads passive earth pressure for terrace deposits may be computed as an equivalent Lid having a density of 300 pcf per foot of depth with a maximum earth pressure of 3000 psf. Should you have any Questions, please contact this office. Respectfully submitted, Gal lls. Inc. Distribution Greystone Homes, Mr. Chris Earl Poal -I1' Fax Nola 7671 a•M /L9 /1 /�� To /-A'JH /Z, j From %(, �/C✓S/'w'� GoleWl. Go. P . I PhOnC I FYI )- L fix 06/12/01 06. 23 V909 3310 SB. June 11, 2001 Lot No. Pad Elevation per Plan OJob No. 57143.00 w 71.0 CITY OF ENCINITAS SB &O, INC. Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue 69.0 _ Encinitas, California 92024 sB &o RE: Bay Laurel Engineer's Pad Certification for TM No. 98 -240 Grading Permit No. 6775 -G 0002/002 Pursuant to Section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Celtification Letter for Lots 13 -16. As the Engineer of Record for the Lund subject project, I hereby state all rough grading for these units has been completed in Planning conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. 23.24.310(B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and cc: Bill Golden/Greystone Homes. Mike Steele/Greystone Homes/site fax 760 - 634 -7666 DA57142tLeamrs RG Pad r n modela.wpd Corporate Office: 3615 Kearny Villa Road. Suite 2014 San Diego. CA 92123 4 Phone (858) 560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 9007 Arrow Route. Suite 120 4 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 1 Phone (909) 948.3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue. Suite 201 4 Temecula. CA 92590 0 Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909) 693 -3320 shown on the approved grading plan: Lot No. Pad Elevation per Plan As -built Pad Elevation 13 71.0 71.0 14 70.0 70.0 15 69.0 69.0 Civil 16 68.0 68.0 f,n��ineeriny Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, pHOFES O AO SB&O, INC. No. 47677 m m 0/ * Exp. 12 - 31 -p? w^�Dan kPE O' k OF CAUFOP Land Vice President Survwing DJO;msb cc: Bill Golden/Greystone Homes. Mike Steele/Greystone Homes/site fax 760 - 634 -7666 DA57142tLeamrs RG Pad r n modela.wpd Corporate Office: 3615 Kearny Villa Road. Suite 2014 San Diego. CA 92123 4 Phone (858) 560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 9007 Arrow Route. Suite 120 4 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 1 Phone (909) 948.3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue. Suite 201 4 Temecula. CA 92590 0 Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909) 693 -3320 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPART,. VT TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ District Support Services C_D) ❑ Capilol Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ Office of the Director (01) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Our conversation ❑ CJ O For your... Correction Z tt. ❑ Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses F2 Please return �-� e Y, �1!:%> SiL C ok- R'r Jac Please call: 700 - ! 3 3 '278 3 if necessary Regarding (Finance Number (,77:�' - �' ) DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number DEPOSITNEE Transmitted as following: ATTENTION: rL F-- U i J� �- DATE: (o/ / Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check Checkprint if Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Interoffice Memorandum• ❑ Plancheck Comments' ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail p Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ p Assessments ❑ Agreement re: n Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ n Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments* ❑ Grading Plan Check Chec mVApproved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments• ❑ TPM/TM/MUP/MIN/DR: `_• ��{+J _ APN: Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: ' ( Staff / Consultant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/Trai UPark/Fac i 1 ity) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ (Mass/Rougb/Preliminary/Precise) Hydrology StudyfMap ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ (Erosion ControVPlanting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval For your... Correction Z tt. ❑ Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses F2 Please return �-� e Y, �1!:%> SiL C ok- R'r Jac Please call: 700 - ! 3 3 '278 3 if necessary Originator: J +- y, _ Copies to: /'[. -E V Messenger ❑ Mail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ Received by: Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633.2700 /SG /ARR/Gcncric Trans. dec /02.11.99 1 of l NAY -22 -01 09:13AN FRON-S680 itecosti� aeQuiasT of First AMVri x T UU strMurywa°l -M WhcoReeosdedMail To And Recording Requasted By: �s cA� City Claris City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinhu, CA 92024 T-484 P 02/12 F -396 DOC # 2001--0294687 MAY 10, 2001 8:47 38 6 sari BRM el> � 'B o il£ XM f> NTH, MW RECOkUER SPACE zmt-02a1mr NOT APPROVEDFORDEVELOPMENT Sd - po�rrvrrp OF C MOLIANCE (Section 66499.35 of the Cfovemment Code) The Director of Comrttunity Development of the Ciry of F.ncinitea has dorm»' *ed that the paeeels of real property described below have been divided or have resLand from a division in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and with provisions of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code. The parcols de= -bed herein may be sold, leased, or fmancedw'rthoutfurthercompliance with the SubdivisionMap Act or m!' local ordinance ernaetad pmt to the Act Development of the pared may require issuance of a permit or permits, or other grant or grants of approval. Section 3.1.1 A.1 of the North 101 Corridor Specific Plan states that the provisions of Title 30 of the Municipal Code applicable w the R8 zoae "be applieablo to the N -RS zone. Section 30.16.010 of The City of Encinitas Municipal Code specifies a minimum lot size of 5,440 square feet. and minimum lot dimensions of 90 fact in depth and 60 Peet in width. This Cae;caft of Compliance applies to tbtee parcels in eomplianoewith the required standardapertsininS W minimum lot irxe and dimensions. Owner /Applicant: GreystoneHomes,Ketmeth L. Vallone Description: (See Exhibit "A".aitaehed) Plat Map: (See Exhibit "B ", attached) MOTE: The descriptions in Exhibit "A" and Plats in Exhibit °,B,, atmchcd, have been provided by the owner ofrhe property, and ncitherthe City of Encinitas nor any of its officers or employees assume any responsibility for the accuracy of said descriptions or Plats This Certificate of Compliance shall in no way affect the requirements of any Cty, County, State, Federal or local ageacy that regulstesdewelopmentofrealpropcm. Case No: 01 -015 BA (see DCD 2001.027 on file in the Community Development Department) AssassorpamelNumbers :254 - 101 -24,& 254.052 -11 & -12 Data: April 10, 2001 BY: Bill cdrnan, city Planner CD/KK/f :101- 015mdoc AM KAY-22-Dl 09:13AM FROM -SUO EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION GREYSTONE TO VALLONE (01 -016 6ACC - Al) T -484 P 03/12 3839 THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 27 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL B, 1888, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 27 AND OF JUNO AVENUE, (SAID ALLEY AND AVENUE BEING VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE) DESCR)BED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: SAID NORTH LEUCAD AIN DISTANT 488.5 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY OM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY , AS SAID 783 F NORTH LEUCAOA. FILED STREET HE OFFICE OFRTTHE SHOWN ICOUNTY RECORDERO OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 320 FEET NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY UNE OF -SAID BLOCK 27. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 LINE, 1.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, 320 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY UNE OF SAID BLOCK 27; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, 1.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS SEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. S. PLS 6922 DATE F -386 .,c 1 Of 1 Ram, r.+.w a mm IAAY -22 -01 09:I3AM1 FROIA -SB&0 T -4B4 P 04/12 F -396 Km EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION GREYSTONE TO VALLONE (01 -015 8= -A2) THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 21 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 5, 1688, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF JUNO AVENUE, AS THE SAME IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 524 (SAID AVENUE BEING VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE), DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID NORTH LEUCADIA, DISTANT 480 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET, AS SAID STREET IS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 763 OF NORTH LEUCAOIA. FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 320 FEET NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET TO AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO DORIS A COBLE, BY DEED DATED FEBRUARY 20, 1935, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 386, PAGE 96 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, A DISTANCE OF 174 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY UNE OF SAID COBLE PARCEL THAT IS DISTANT THEREALONG 9 FEET NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID COBLE PARCEL; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, A DISTANCE OF 7.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, 174 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, THROUGH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 7.70 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHWESTERLY 6.5 FEET AS MEASURED PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET. i� nasae.reaa� 1 Of 2 WGi V MAY -22-01 09:14AM FROM -SUO T -464 P 05/12 F -386 3841 THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. MICHAEL S. BUTCHER, HL5 W14Z luk& 2 of 2 11 (i�Jw.VYi )'S1 MAY -22 -01 09:I4AM FROM -SRO T -484 P.06/12 F -396 3842 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCFL A-1 (01 -015 BACCI THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 27 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 27 AND OF JUNO AVENUE, (SAID ALLEY AND AVENUE BEING VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE) DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, DISTANT 480 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET AS SAID STREET IS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 763 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 320 FEET NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 6.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, 320 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, 6.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF SAID BLOCK 27, AND A PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 27 AND OF JUNO AVENUE, (SAID ALLEY AND AVENUE BEING VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE) DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID NORTH LEUCADIA, DISTANT 486.5 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET, AS SAID STREET 15 SHOWN ON MAP NO. 753 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 320 FEET NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 LINE, 1.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, 320 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27; �� {� 1 of 4 awl4mv MAY -22 -01 09:14AM FROM -SRO T-484 P 07/12 F -396 3843 THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, 120 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PAR ELA2 (01 -015 BACC1 THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 21 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524. FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF JUNO AVENUE, AS THE SAME IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 624 (SAID AVENUE BEING VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE), DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID NORTH LEUCADIA, DISTANT 480 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET, AS SAID STREET IS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 763 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER UNE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 320 FEET NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY UNE OF SAID BLOCK 27, SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER UNE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET TO AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO DORIS A_ COBLE, BY DEED DATED FEBRUARY 20. 1935, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 386, PAGE 96 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, A DISTANCE OF 174 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID COBLE PARCEL THAT IS DISTANT THEREALONG 9 FEET NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID COBLE PARCEL; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY UNE OF SAID BLOCK 27, A DISTANCE OF 7.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, 174 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL \ITN THE SOUTHWESTERLY UNE OF SAID BLOCK 27, THROUGH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL UNE, A DISTANCE OF 7.70 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B- 1(01 -015 SAM A PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 15, IN BLOCK 27, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF JUNO AVENUE ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 1 LYING WESTERLY OF UNE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 320 FEET NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, AND We 2 of 4 0-1--m 'iQtnoa y...,z am, MAY -22-01 09:15AM FROM -SHO T -494 P 08112 F-396 3844 ALSO A PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 27 ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS 1 AND 16, AS SAID AVENUE AND ALLEY WERE VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1918, BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH SAID ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26,1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO; ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON APRIL 6, 1888, EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID NORTH LEUCADIA, DISTANT 487.70 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET, AS SAID STREET IS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 763 OF NORTH LEUGADIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 320 FEET NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27. PARCEL B- 2101 -015 BACC1 A PORTION OF LOT 9, IN BLOCK 21 AND A PORTION JUNO AVENUE, ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 9 LYING EASTERLY OF LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH ANC DISTANT 320 FEET NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, AS SAID AVENUE WAS VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH SAID ORDER WERE RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 19181N BOOK 500, PAGE 343 IN BOOK OF DEEDS, ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1886, EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND: THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 21 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF N0, 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 8,18U, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF JUNO AVENUE, AS THE SAME IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 524 (SAID AVENUE BEING VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE), DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: 'K dTi ¢o 3 o! 4 om,.ay mr. �.wx a ma MAY -22-01 09:16AM FROM -SUO T -484 P 09/12 F -396 3845 COMMENCING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID NORTH LEUCADIA, DISTANT 486.5 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE 763 NOF NORTH LEUCADIA, FILED�'TME OFF CE OF THE STREET ICOUNT( RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND FA ANGLES FROM THE DISTANT OUTHWESTERLY LINE OSA D BLOCK 227,, SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED; LINE OF SAID NORTHEASTERLY AN L CENTER MONTEREY STREETADISTAEOF 174 FEET O NT LYING 6.50 SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO DORIS A. COBLE, BY DEED DATED FEBRUARY 20, 1935, AND RECORDED IN BOOK 386, PAGE 96 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DISTANT THEREALONG 2.50 FEET NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID COBLE PARCEL; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, A DISTANCE OF 1.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, PARALLEL W1TH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MONTEREY STREET, 174 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, THROUGH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; NORTHWESTERLY SAID MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1.20 TO THE TRUE O BEGINNING. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. MICHAEL PLS 6922 a ,00®w ;om�.,., aand 4 of 4 0'T" MAY -22 -01 09:16AM FROM -SUC bUUNUARY ADJUSTMENT PLAT MAP N0. EXHIBIT "B° srr v oF, vF,s i I I ! PARCEL A -1 j AFW 134- Q52-1I I I � LOT 16 GOT 7 I 27 / 'dX 27 ;hiu LOT !O 6YX if _ r ` 'O9v 37L4G0' W ,gyp FARM B 2 LOT 75 4 L0r 2) L k 4 p M-Qi?- I2 NX ?7 4tX 27 LOT 9 CdA 11 LOT B NX 71 PARCEL B -1 � 0-r� swmw �W N7r5d'Geo'E — � vc hi N7s7B09� 3280/" 17ACLT' _ PARCEL A AA-1 A NTii -6b9� .]70101' � GOr s 'w afivw sr" 217 0 100 217 4W �pL, L.Uµp &0 avu M�offm ilAig-,1115hl EV. Lwe PLa4� y i LA7! l,� Nu.6921 � l w 10, n 93AM osm)& o -1147 a cL►1 OWNER haUGW 7867 76trMC ME APi.6T ADDRESS 180 AI KACAN APE PHONE ND. G11Y rAMW THIS PUT WAS PREPARED INN NY kNOWLEDGE APID CONSENT � THIS PUT WAS PREPARED WRN WY KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT APPUCANT/ WD BY SHAD OWNER GYPE'1S/EY/E NHS ADDRESS JIM AOiN7NY WtA RtMa :rME 101 ADDRESS VM AZ"T S7MFT f C1fY sw 41800, OV3LPBm MP 91'13 CITY acoaL.tt0 4P 920M PHONE NO. i036% 167 -24' PHONE N0. (750) " -7 8W LS NO. I /-ljv-00 57142&140MU .5774203 T -484 P 10/12 F -386 MAY -22 -01 09:17AM FROM -SUO T -484 P 11/12 F -396 ..... mm.z... o enoert4e scKldAlAIIEDGUENT Stale or Caldomia a, J�a c go tletore me. personally appeared 2 r 38,47 or><1lly known In me ealdeoca_ to be the p5= tt4. whose name(e) I subscribed to the wt pns Itrumen end acknowledged to me executed the same in I elr �� tho,�rized capaeity*:V -L and at by L'J "" "' "ir signatureje)on the instrument the persorixor the entity upon behalf of which the per30n(4) acted, executed the instrument WITNESS m d and I ' I seat. n a la,vn OPTIONAL 7t+CUfl1r ' ^"'�^ balor a not hou6ed by WK It may Provo varrrabla to Po"c"o m'YN on me am"M and owi d Drat rraya(/renr MM M41 and M gdWAj Mt of duo k m! in afladlar doewnenL Deuriptien of attached DOOUment Title or Type d Dawmank Dooumem Signarts) Other TheRmed Above: CspaciWea) Claimad by S Sfgnere Nerve: ❑ Individual ❑ Comorets Officer — Tltie(s): ❑ Partner — in O Anomey k Fact tor TrUSM5 or O Guwdlan 0 Other. Signer is ftepmSen tn9: m tw wler riarr�saaw� • �, � �.wr. r.v... -. nGiMi 11 r1 oA'As..re[ �ur.d Rugs. dTwA.s samms"'4 MAY -22 -01 09:17AM FROM -SRO t ... ..a .s..tenncc Ar_rUnWLE1MYEN7 T -484 P 12/12 F -396 State of CaVotnla County of 2n_tK Cir 421ni . betare me. pa,monsuy aNxiared t: Pte trwr avM� yrproved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the pentorvty� whose namdW subscnbed to the wi Instrument end acknowledged m me ne e1cNCned the same In n uthorlsed cspadty(tea), an that ty (hisrRWe+ey signatureN on the ksstrvmam the nK or the entity upon behalf of which the persor*U acted, executed the in5trumMrL WRNF�SS and and 'al Keel. rrwyv CP7 0NAL an n. doaum tnr though Rte kgwwaon hrtrew is MI m WAvd ty few, ft mq profs fttNOr to P'a' rWFV and weld pr9.en! A+rddsnt fa �ar Aod raeeetM nr d thk Arm m en "her *MW Wt Description of Attached Document Tills c[7ype of Documera Numoer of 111 = gtgner'(a) Other Than Gpaerty(ies) Claimed by 9 $loner's Nerve: ❑ Cgrpor+' Offic w ❑ partner- 0Umkec OGet Q Adaney in Foci O Trvatce ❑ t^wardian or rvetor ❑ other Representing: om ra sut RIrAn O� Ww �ieC- sib -iY I,— .nIGIMAI IF THIS DOCIKNT WAS RECORDED ON MAY 16, 2001 When Recorded Mail To ) DOCUMENT NOMBER '2(101- OJ106TJ And Recording Requested By: ) R50RY J. SMITH, CUKTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIFF: 129:08 PM City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 S. Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOT APPROVED FOR DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (Section 66499.35 of the Government Code) IN COMPLIANCE: The Director of Community Development of the City of Encinitas has determined that the parcels of real property described below have been divided or have resulted from a division in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and with provisions of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code. The parcels described herein may be sold, leased, or financed without further compliance with the Subdivision Map Act or any local ordinance enacted pursuant to the Act. Development of the parcel may require issuance of a permit or permits, or other grant or grants of approval. Section 30.16.010 of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code specifies a minimum lot size of 5,400 square feet, and minimum lot dimensions of 90 feet in depth and 60 feet in width for the subject R8 (Residential 8) zone. This Certificate of Compliance applies to three parcels in compliance with the required standards pertaining to minimum lot size and dimensions. Owner/ Applicant: Greystone Homes, William M. & Lisa S. Lafferty, G. William & Sally B. Hall Description: (See Exhibit "A ", attached) Plat Map: (See Exhibit `B ", attached) NOTE: The descriptions in Exhibit "A" and Plats in Exhibit "B ", attached, have been provided by the owner of the property, and neither the City of Encinitas nor any of its officers or employees assume any responsibility for the accuracy of said descriptions or Plats. This Certificate of Compliance shall in no way affect the requirements of any City, County, State, Federal or local agency that regulates development of real property. Case No: 01 -014 BA (see DCD 2001 -42 on file in the Community Development Department) Assessor Parcel Numbers: 254 - 102 -22, -26, -51 Date: May 15, 2001 BY: C Bill Weedman, City Planner CD/KK/f: \01 -014 cc. doc EXHIBIT'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 9, IN BLOCK 21 AND THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 7 THROUGH 11 IN BLOCK 22, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF HYGEIA AVENUE, SANFORD STREET AND JUNO AVENUE, AS VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, AND JANUARY 28, 1925, BY ORDERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CERTIFIED COPIES OF WHICH SAID ORDERS WERE RECORDED RESPECTIVELY DECEMBER 26, 1918 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 AND FEBRUARY 9, 1925 IN BOOK 1071, PAGE 122, BOTH OF DEEDS, ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF HYGEIA AVENUE WITH A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 480.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET (NOW HILLCREST DRIVE) AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 524, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO ROBERT LLOYD WESTREM, RECORDED JULY 23, 1936 IN BOOK 546, PAGE 82 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, THENCE SOUTH 7401T30" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 551.00 FEET TO A POINT IN A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 320.00 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID MAP NO. 524; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE SOUTH 15 042'30" EAST 319.60 FEET TO A POINT IN A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 120.00 FEET NORTHERLY FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SANFORD STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 524; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 74 017'30" EAST 130.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 15 °42'30" EAST 140.00 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 20.00 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SANFORD STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 74 017'30" EAST 700.00 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 170.00 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOTS 7 THROUGH 11 IN BLOCK 22 OF SAID MAP NO. 524; THENCE NORTH 15 042'30" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 639.50 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 33.10 FEET OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 74 °17'30" WEST 170.00 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID HYGEIA AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 15 °42'30" EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 179.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARCELS OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS TO SULANA B SAE -ONGE, RONALD E. JOHNSON AND THOMAS D. HARDEBECK AND MARY MARTHA HARDEBECK BY DEEDS RECORDED MAY 4, 2001 AS FILE NOS. 2001- 0282072, 2001- 0282073, AND 2001- 0282074, RESPECTIVELY OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PARCELS OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEEDS TO G. WILLIAM HALL AND SALLY B. HALL, CO- TRUSTEES OF THE HALL FAMILY TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 15, 1999 AND WILLIAM MICHAEL LAFFERTY AND LISA STONE LAFFERTY, BY DEEDS RECORDED MAY 17, 2001 AS FILE NOS. 2001- 0316154 AND 2001 - 0316155, RESPECTIVELY OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 1lt1:ZN:1111111:1 ALL OF LOTS 7 TO 10 INCLUSIVE AND PORTION OF LOTS 6 AND 11 IN BLOCK 27, TOGETHER WTH A PORTION OF SANFORD STREET AND JUNO AVENUE, AND ALSO A PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 27, AS SAID STREET, AVENUE AND ALLEY WERE VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH SAID ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, DISTANT 20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF, THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 116 -125 FEET NORTHWESTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 320 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND DISTANT EASTERLY THEREFROM 320 FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE 136.125 FEET TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 320 FEET ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: ALL OF LOTS 2 TO 15 INCLUSIVE AND A PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 16, IN BLOCK 27, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF SANFORD STREET AND JUNO AVENUE, AND ALSO A PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK 27, AS SAID STREET, AVENUE AND ALLEY WERE VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ON NOVEMBER 19, 1915, BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH SAID ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS. IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO: ALL BEING IN NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON APRIL 6, 1888, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS' BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, DISTANT 20 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 480 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET, AS SAID STREET IS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 763, OF NORTH LEUCADIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND DISTANT EASTERLY THEREFROM, 320 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE, 380 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 AND THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING FROM ALL OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY THE SOUTHEASTERLY 136.125 FEET THEREOF ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHWESTERLY 6.50 FEET THEREOF ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN DEED TO KENNETH L. VALLONE, TRUSTEE OR HIS SUCCESSORS IN TRUST UNDER THE VALLONE 1987 IRREVOCABLE TRUST UNDER AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 25, 1987, RECORDED MAY 10 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001- 0294688 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 21 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 524, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 6, 1888, AND OF THE NORTHWESTERLY 20 FEET OF SANFORD STREET AND OF THE NORTHEASTERLY 20 FEET OF JUNO AVENUE, VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE NOVEMBER 19, 1915 BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH ORDER WAS RECORDED DECEMBER 26, 1916 IN BOOK 500, PAGE 343 OF DEEDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 320.00 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE WEST LINE OF BLOCK 27 OF SAID NORTH LEUCADIA AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF, WITH A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 939 6 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP, SAID POINT BEING ON A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 20 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 21 AND THE PROLONGATION THEREOF, THENCE NORTHWESTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27 A DISTANCE OF 140.0 FEET, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTER LINE OF MONTEREY STREET 130.0 FEET, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 27, A DISTANCE OF 140.0 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 20.0 FEET AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTHEASTERLY FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 21, THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 130.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. City Of ' Encinitas Mr. Daniel J. O'Rourke, Project Manager SB &O Engineering, Inc. / \ 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 Temecula, CA 92590 April 30, 2001 RE: STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR WDII V4, 375; BAY LAUREN SUBDIVISION TRACT 98-240 r! � �l Dear Mr. O'Rourke This project falls under the coverage of the State of California General Construction rmit, which requir that grading operations over 5 acres file a Notice of Intent (NOI) and fulfill all requ' ements of 99 -08 including the development and implementation of a SWPPP. A fully developed d impl ented SWPPP should identify and abate all sources of potential pollution through the impleme tion of tructural and / non - structural Best Management Practices (BMP's). After reviewing the SWPPP and B P's proposed for this project, the City is requesting clarification and additional information. • Page I of 19 6vx, 1)` Please provide names and contacts for the "Erosion Control Contractor' and "Sto Water Pollution / Prevention Plan Inspector & Emergency Response." Page 2 of 19 r Please include the City of Encinitas as a contact as listed below: City of Encinitas Stormwater Management Division 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, 92024 (760) 633 - 2626 32, (760) 633 -2787 fj1'Jl_J� I1 • �iI Ms. Katherine Weldon, Mr. Garret Williams] µ W 0 P S of 19 pRt'. "IY,tJ Please lease select /identify which BMP's will be implemented. A list of poten a/ BMP's does not satisfy / the requirements of Permit No. 99 -08. Paget -IS of 19 The Slate of California generally looks for the following elements to be implemented. 0 1. Slope Stabilization (erosion prevention not to be confused with sediment control). ✓ 2. Perimeter Control ✓ / 3. Stabilized Construction Entrance 4. Adequately Designed / Sized Siltation Basin 5. Subcontractor Education and Training 6. Updated and Complete Monitoring Log ✓ TEL '60-613-2(0) 1 F.A.X -W- 633 -262' ins S. \'rdcan Avenuc. F.nciniras, California 92024-3433 1 D -W -63 t -2-nn 1# recycled paper • Page 13 of 19 Please rewrite to convey the idea that absolutely no construction related wastewater shall be allowed to flow offsite indirectly or directly via stormwater conveyance systems (i.e. hoses, pumping, gutters, / I streets, or storm drains). All discharges of wastewater, including potable water discharges, shall be captured onsite in a retention pond or discharged to the sanitary sewer as approved by City engineering inspectors. Eliminate the paragraph "Allowable non -storm water discharges shall include • Attached Map Stabilized construction entrance length shown to be approximately 8'. Generally, 40' is the standard. • Appendix V Does the sedimentation basin calculations consider and account for the potential of offsite runon or is all offsite water diverted away from the sedimentation basin. • Appendix V Sedimentation basins using design "Option 2" of the Permit No. 99 -08 shall be twice as long as wide, VZ measured from the influent storm drain pipe to the outfall stand pipe. The basin design does not meet this standard. Each construciton and building project needs to comply with all applicable Federal, State, and Local laws, / building codes, ordinances, and environmental requirements. Should you have any questions, please call me directly at 760 - 633 -2787. Sincerelyj�� Garret Williams Environmental Health Enforcement Officer Post -it" Fax Note 7671 Dale,, fir? / pages) / Ta N "eel Co./Dept /•_J From Co. 6`ft c� 1r rn 5 Phone j -331/0 Phone M �� 1 J Faxpj ^33zo Fax# - 1-2 /r��.' �� !l �!!l /S� i�J' Liles %�/�t' '�/W�o zie (e �i7TJA7 QC CJry¢,�elEC �IY�L dJ% 7V 2V ;&F /7 /xtL1$Ci W /lif �'laT7rlE 7t/QU- /�P�f��i� 1YIrUC y5 3�zv.�J.�cGDu�" - J`rtT%u� Z�-=T ✓!lE Kt/rrx% �V fY SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME 51ZE QUANTITY VI DI TORIA BLOOD -RED TRUMPET VINE X V1 PA551FLORA 'LAVE N 5 GAL. X 5 GAL. X V3 MA551F NA GI'a VENUSTA FLAME VINE GAL. X HYDROD5EED MIX - NATIVE, NON - IRRIGATED 4\. � ARTEMESIA CALIFOFNICA CALIFORNIA SAGEBRUSH 3 LBSIACRE �.� BACCHARI5 PILULARIS DWARF COYOTE 51-15J 3 LBSIACRE - ENCELIA CALIFORNICA BUSH SUNFLOWER 4 LBS /ACRE -1 ERIOGONUM FASCICULATUM CALIFORNIA BUCKllHEAT 1_55 /ACRE ESCH5CHOLZIA CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA POPPY 2LBB5./CAC HELIANTI -IEMUM 5COPARIUM SUN ROSE LOTUS 6COPARIU5 DEER WEED 4 LBS /ACRE LUPINUS BICOLOR LUPINE MIMMULU5 PUNICEU5 RED MONKEYFLOWER 5ALvIA MELLIFERA BLACK SAGE 2 LBS. /ACRE EX15TI RE ING LAN T I ON NORTH S CITY OF ENCINITAS ENCINEERING DEPARTMENT DPAWNGNO 'PG:ED eY LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING PIANS FOR- ' rK x BAY LAUREL " GRID .. 57141.00 MSB 1/23/01 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E BASIS OF BEARINGS TIE TO ROS 16810 - SAN DIEGO COUNTY SURVEYOR 1 1968855.580 6242000.322 134WCCS1 N 88/46/30 E 4412.82 2 1968949.928 6246412.134 134WCCS2 N 67/00/49 W 8166.79 51. 1972139.144 6238893.798 S 74157157 W 319.96 50 1972056.149 6238584.791 SW CDR S 46/51/39 E 4680.76 1 1968855.580 6242000.322 134WCCSI Closure= N 68/227/24 E 0.003 0.001 0.003 Area = 8026019.357 Sq Ft 184.2521 Acres JAN 2 U` 2001 S BAY LAUREL " GROUND " 57141.00 MSB 1/23/01 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E BASIS OF BEARINGS TIE TO ROS 16810 - SAN DIEGO COUNTY SURVEYOR 1 1968855.447 6242000.423 134WCCS1 N 88/46/30 E 4412.99 2 1968949.799 6246412.403 134WCCS2 N 67/00/49 W 8167.10 51 1972139.136 6238893.781 S 74/57/57 W 319.97 50 1972056.138 6238584.762 SW CDR S 46/51/39 E 4680.94 1 1968855.447 6242000.423 134WCCS1 Closure: N 88/59/23 E 0.009 0.000 0.009 Area = 8026629.690 Sq Ft 184.2661 Acres Y N 319,9 N6 �8 BJ 9 "134WCC52" 134WC1 „ N 88�4� �3o "E 44/ 2, 99� N 1968949.945 N 1968855.580 E 6246412.138 E 6242000.322 �441Z gZ �,c�iD� SB LOT 47 - STREET VACATION 1048 1972138.226 6238894.418 S 15/02/25 E 6.15 1999 1972132.283 62:38896.015 N 40/35/41 W 25.00 2001 Arc center 1972151.266 6238879.747 JAN 2 0 2001 LAUREL MAP CLOSURES #57142.00 MSB 1/25/01 .,BAY Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 47 - PARK SITE 2067 1972416.042 6238493.333 N 74/58/09 E 230.75 2022 1972475.886 6238716.193 S 15/02/28 E 85.06 2023 1972393.742 6238738.266 S 66/44/27 E 107.55 2071 1972351.272 6238837.074 S 86/24/11 E 70.50 2013 Arc center 1972346.849 6238907.435 D= 51/48/26 L= 63.75 C= 61.60 ST= 34.24 S 41/47/24 W 70.50 2186 1972294.285 6238860.454 S 41/47/24 W 40.00 2170 Arc center 1972264.461 6238833.798 D= 33/10/09 L= 23.16 C= 22.83 ST= 11.91 N 74/57/33 E 40.00 2169 1972274.841 6238872.428 S 15/02/27 E 121.24 2002 1972157.754 6238903.891 S 74/57/33 W 25.00 - 2001 Arc center 1972151.266 6238879.747 D= 106/01/54 L= 46.27 C= 39.94 ST= 33.20 S 00/59/26 W 25.00 2000 1972126.270 6238879.315 S 00/59/26 W 325.00 106 Arc center 1971801.319 6238873.696 D= 16/01/29 L= 90.90 C= 90.60 ST= 45.75 N 15/02/03 W 325.00 2063 1972115.194 6238789.393 S 74/57/57 W 185.59 2156 1972067.053 62384,10.156 N 15/02/03 W 22.00 2157 Arc center 1972088.300 6238604.449 D= 89/57/02 L= 34.54 C= 31.10 ST= 21.98 S /4/54/59 W 22.00 2158 1972082.575 6238583.207 N 15/05/01 W 345.37 2067 1972416.042 6238493.333 Closure: N 75/30/11 W 0.005 0.001 -0.004 Area = 108404.745 Sq Ft 2.4886 Acres LOT 47 - STREET VACATION 1048 1972138.226 6238894.418 S 15/02/25 E 6.15 1999 1972132.283 62:38896.015 N 40/35/41 W 25.00 2001 Arc center 1972151.266 6238879.747 JAN 2 0 2001 -,BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES #57142.00 MSB 1/25/01 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E 2001 U= 41/35/08 L= 18.15 C:= 17,75 ST= 9.49 S 00/59/26 W 25.00 2000 1972126.270 6238879.315 S 00/59/26 W 325.00 106 Arc center 1971801.319 6238873.696 D= 5/57/42 L= 33.82 C= 33.80 ST= 16.92 N 04/58/15 W 3225.00 1998 1972125.096 6238845.535 N 74/57/57 E 50.62 1048 1972138.226 6238894.418 Closure= N 43/01/31 E 0.006 0.004 0.004 Area = 256.977 Sq Ft 0.0059 Acres At- 15;e-b !fir ZS s 36 -¢2 2001 BAY LAUREL REVISED PERIMETER BOUNDARY (ADJUSTED) 57142.05MSB 1/24/01 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E PERIMETER BOUNDARY AS ADJUSTED (PENDING ADJUSTMENTS) 2048 1972893.872 6239550.357 NE CDR S 15/03/13 E 442.99 147 1972466.084 6239665.412 BNDRY ADJ S 74/56/47 W 2.50 146 1972465.435 6239662.998 BNDRY ADJ S 15/03/13 E 196.00 1191 1972276.161 6239713.904 SE CDR S 74/56/42 W 827. 21 1034 1972061.296 6238915.089 N 15/02/25 W 79.66 1048 1972138.226 6238894.418 S 74/57/57 W 319.97 2062 1972055.227 6238585.399 SW CDR N 15/05/01 W 372.35 1071 1972414.745 6238488.504 NW COR N 74/58/09 E 494.36 107:3 1972542.953 6238965.950 N 15/07/39 W 7.70 10:35 1972550.386 623896:3.940 N 74/58/09 E 189.85 1084 1972599.621 6239147.290 S 14/45/59 E 9.54 142 1972590.394 62:39149.722 N %S /14/01 E 295.68 144 1972665.756 6239435.637 N 15/03/15 W 172.08 1354 1972831.926 6239390.943 N 76/09/14 E 19.00 1356 1972836.473 6239409.395 N 57/58/54 E 64.33 1:357 1972870.582 62:3946:3.941 N /4155100 E 89.50 2048 1972893.872 6239550.357 Closure: N 31127110 W 0.011 0.010 -0.006 Area = 525176.245 Sq Ft 12.0564 Acres At- 15;e-b !fir ZS s 36 -¢2 2001 BAY I _:;i'EL REVISED LOTS 28, 36 -42 CLOSURES 57142.05 MSB 1/24/01 ,Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 118 2118 1972452.076 6239530.658 N 59/44/53 W 41.50 2018 Arc center 1972472.984 62239494.809 D= 27/53/24 L= 20.20 C= 20.00 ST= 10.30 S 87/38/17 E 41.50 2120 1972471.274 62:395:36.274 S T' /09/35 E 47.30 2121 1972456.784 6239581.297 N 74/58/31 E 83.64 2122 1972478.467 6239662.082 S 15/03/13 E 12.82 147 1972466.084 62:39665.412 S 74/56/47 W 2.50 146 1972465.435 6239662.998 S 15/03/13 E 92.59 101 1972:376.024 62:39687.045 S 75/00/24 W 85.60 2051 1972353.880 6239604.363 N 15/01/20 W 84.39 2119 1972435.389 6239582.488 N 722/09/14 W 54.45 2118 1972452.076 6239530.658 Closure= S 32/56/19 W 0.007 -0.005 -0.004 Area = 10004.847 Sq Ft 0.2297 Acres L. 01 36 2134 N 75114101 E 144 N 15/03/15 W 1096 N 74/58/31 E 204% .S' 15/01/29 E 2213 S 74/58/31 W 2049 Arc center D= 22/37/40 L= S 82/23/49 E 2216. S 04/46/43 E 2016 Are center D= 43/14/14 L= N 48/00/57 W 2217 N 48/00/57 W 22 ?5 Arc center 19726,39.906 6239337.566 101.42 1972665.756 6239435.637 1.00 1972666.722 6239435.377 :3.47 1972667.620 6239438.725 16.98 1972651.211 6239443.126 182.50 1972603.910 6239266.865 72.07 C= 71.61 ST= 36.51 182.50 1972579.764 6239447.761 70.50 1972509.509 6239453.634 53.20 C= 51.95 ST= 27.94 70.50 1972556.669 6239401.229 39.50 1972583.091 6239371.868 BAY JAURFI REVISED LOTS 28, 36 -42 CLOSURES 57142.05 MSB 1/24101 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E 2225 D= 33/14/31 L= 22.92 C= 22.60 ST= 11.79 S 14/46/26 E 39.50 2218 1972544.897 6239381.940 S 75/13/34 W 18.20 2185 1972540.256 6239364.344 N 15/02/28 W 103.18 2134 1972639.906 6239337.566 Closure: S 32/42/23 E 0.006 -0.005 0.003 Area = 9448.155 Sq Ft 0.2169 Acres BAY S(AMEL REVISED LOTS 28, 36 -42 CLOSURES 57142.05 MSB 1/24/01 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOf 37 2136 N 75/14/01 E 72.00 2134 2136 S 15/02/28 E 103.18 218`i E 103.19 2135 S 75/13/34 W 72.00 2135 S 75/13/34 W N 15/02/28 W 103.117 2136 N Closure: W 103.20 N 19/28/14 W 0.001 Area = 7429.633 S"q Ft L.1) 1 38 2035 1972621.555 6239267.943 1972639.906 6239337.566 1972540.256 6239364.344 1972521.896 6239294.723 1972621.555 6239267.943 0.001 -0.000 0.1706 Acres 1972606.262 6239209.92224 1972621.555 6239267.943 1972521.896 6239294.723 1972506.596 6239236.706 1972606.262 6239209.924 0.002 -0.001 0.1421 Acres N 75/14/01 E 60.00 2136 S 15/02/28 E 103.19 2135 S 75/13/34 W 60.00 2137 N 15/02/28 W 103.20 2035 Closure: N 16/01/57 W 0.002 Area = 6191.883 Sq Ft 1972621.555 6239267.943 1972639.906 6239337.566 1972540.256 6239364.344 1972521.896 6239294.723 1972621.555 6239267.943 0.001 -0.000 0.1706 Acres 1972606.262 6239209.92224 1972621.555 6239267.943 1972521.896 6239294.723 1972506.596 6239236.706 1972606.262 6239209.924 0.002 -0.001 0.1421 Acres BAY,LAUREL REVISED LOTS 28, 36 -42 CLOSURES 57142.05 MSB 1/24/01 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E L0l 39 143 N 75114101 E 2035 S 15/02/28 E 2137 S 75/13/34 W 2139 N 15/02/28 W 143 Closure: 1972590.969 6239151.905 60.00 1972606.262 6239209.924 103.20 60.00 103.21 N 16/01/57 W 0.002 Area = 6192.347 Sq Ft L01 40 2014 N 74/58/09 E 1084 S 14/45/59 E 14' N 75114101 E 143 S 15/02/28 E 2139 S 75/13/34 W 2141 N 15/02/28 W 2014 Closure: N 89/25/18 E 19722506.596 6239236.706 1972491.295 6239178.689 1972590.969 6239151.905 0.002 -0.001 0.1422 Acres 1972584.634 6239091.479 57.79 1972599.621 6239147.290 9.54 1972590.394 6239149.722 2.26 1972590.969 6239151.905 103.21 112.49 0.005 Area = 6736.321 Sq Ft 1972491.295 6239178.689 1972475.995 6239120.672 1972584.634 6239091.479 0.000 0.005 0.1546 Acres BAY.LAUREL REVISED LOTS 28, 36 -42 CLOSURES 57142.05 MSB 1/24/01 'Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 41 2012 LOT 42 2146 N 74/58/09 E 72.00 2014 S 15/02/28 E 112.49 2141 S 75/13/34 W 72.00 2143 N 15/02/28 W 112.17 2012 Closure: 75/13/34 W 65.00 N 00/07/30 E 0.003 Area = 8087.855 Sq Ft LOT 42 2146 1972565.961 6239021.942 1972584.634 6239091.479 1972475.995 6239120.672 1972457.634 6239051.052 1972565.961 6239021.942 0.003 0.000 0.1857 Acres 1972541.668 6238961.164 1972542.953 6238965.950 1972550.386 6238963.940 1972565.961 6239021.942 1972457.634 6239051.052 1972441.059 6238988.200 1972541.668 6238961.164 0.004 0.008 Area = 7243.438 Sq Ft 0.1663 Acres N 74/58/09 E 4.96 1073 N 15/07/39 W 7.70 1035 N 74/58/09 E 60.06 2012 S 15/02/28 E 112.17 2143 S 75/13/34 W 65.00 214` N 15/02/28 W 104.18 2146 Closure: N 65/42/45 E 0.009 1972565.961 6239021.942 1972584.634 6239091.479 1972475.995 6239120.672 1972457.634 6239051.052 1972565.961 6239021.942 0.003 0.000 0.1857 Acres 1972541.668 6238961.164 1972542.953 6238965.950 1972550.386 6238963.940 1972565.961 6239021.942 1972457.634 6239051.052 1972441.059 6238988.200 1972541.668 6238961.164 0.004 0.008 Area = 7243.438 Sq Ft 0.1663 Acres HILLCREST D � '� 36745 s,1a,e 4c ��„oJ�.� 254 —t0 73 23 70 75 340.00 r .r60 as PM 3264 SHT 2 OF 2 c a Q p 0.78AC. I" 100' h — i PAR 6 4/ s9 6L 1 0 0 7enc 2.aoac w R'71 •� RO' PAR I PAR 2 i O .��~ •� ti o {_ s5 h ) CUT SE I h PAR.I °� FWR2 i ..74•sa.i4 "c, 14 ° ? 57 ° a i' 246 �� .°, PM17716 SHT I &442 2S7 c PART PAR M = 7a9 PM 13529 : r O ~ �-/ i`- •`-n 85 /970 /af./J' o v 7o.ey PMZ fi566�a..Yf19i 0 2` ,✓7s ie:as'E I i SBf59 97 /339 �>?f•.00 N74.Oi'frE J96.53 e9 SOT. PM17716 2f7 75.06 — 2.50 AC. �/ \ /'�,3? 3�srt w7f•f9•!7•.E - / Y � 3 1 l�Y 13 � T h 0.68AC. 102 -fo _ w.�.a•a.as-e. PAR 2 ^ ^ 3 29 O 4 I I 2.664 AC AC I Q d o ♦ I SHT I /7v ° 23 24 1V ! I I I PM 31264 ;l�i;i Q N Q aO ; j F rw 6 0 .O 3] /D/9O ! 49 O se � N .4 d.3 249.3/ h v � ti e 4 3 m6a4a , grit g? ^ 79.71 4s9 7dO /70 e4 ^ V s. 74 • 1L'JS "w a s.s1/-c20 ! J % 1 6 SHORE VIEW h LN. J � 7L wt6d[!, ` IS 05 7J uc s /49.13 `t3af 174.dL /54.00 ` Tk \ a3 B al 9 dMAP 6843 - WILSON ESTATES '7000 Sq 64_- et 7J 7t `O.BDAC /tJ - SEC 4 - T13S -R4W - POR NW 1/4 a t33.3e 5.74' /L:.fJ "w ' _ SANFORD s ST. /a.aa So (MAP 524 - N0. LEUCADIQ - POR BLKS 22 & 23) It ' } 40 (MAP 763 - N0.LEUCADIA REFILED) "1 ROS 11703, 12592 UN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BK 254 PD 10 - SHY 2 OF 2 A MAPPFO FOR Attrec.r.♦ e...... .. 19 1 F 11 2.89 AC TRAILER RANCHO MOBILE HOME PARK (SEE SHT 3) 10 SHT I ift Ii x _ 1.7 AG w e r To.91 AC. T T T 1 r T T _ d g A! /J'41 - /OW 230 st 100.08 PM 12039 s. 4 SHT2, \J 0.57AC c PAR 2 19 LOOAC 17 PAP I T T T N 1' N O 2 � N /JI /JlW >` T r fi 2 I, �. _ Iw cr O W 0.52P.0 15 _ J PAR 2-t z: 2. L PAR I _ i L L 16 J- 053 /AC� PM 11456 � /fJ I. Of YJe rH•a'JJ -w 11 2.89 AC TRAILER RANCHO MOBILE HOME PARK (SEE SHT 3) 10 SHT I ift Ii x _ 1.7 AG w e r To.91 AC. T T T 1 r T T _ d g a SHT2, \J 0.57AC LOOAC 17 T T T N v w ,� >` T r fi - I, Ila J O 0.52P.0 0.92 _ J T--1 T T �L 10 ACCESS L L -T T -r r T I AL I 1 I lJi.80 1 1 a VULCAN _ 14 3.95 AC 1 T IV rs %ii w cc�, 10 136./2 \J LOOAC 17 T T T T v r T Iz7.4oT T T fi T Ila O 0.52P.0 0.92 Y_ T--1 T T T —r L L 16 J- 24J. w 5 (A.T. d S.F. R.R. R/W ) (OLD HIGHWAY 101 X1 SD 2B) N COAST HIGHWAY .rr u'ri • w I.-1 9 11 SHTZO SHT ? OF 1"-1001 AVE %, POR PAR IA SBE MAP 804 -37 -9H 25 SHT 2 101 04/06/00 CHANGES ILK OLD NEW Y CUT 153 6 ijosIi / 6 341 753 5,41 11 ,13, 7 59,2 152 I - 6 8 -13 74 2769 153 ._ 6-111744274,5 PM 1O52 7 /D 15 -171 B2 1J2C 032 17 /6409.83 2512 2 e p SHT I Q nH6 VA➢ WAS PREPAFi® FOII ASSE59.@1T PLhE955A] CJ ASSLME0 FOR THE ACCURACY O 7hE DATA SHOW ./mot 0 LMAr NOT CO.IPLY WITH LOCAL SUSW6CN OR SEC 4 - T1 IS- R4W - POR NW 1, 4 7 -t7 n Q (MAP 524 - NO. LEUCAOIA - BLKS 20.27.34 & POR SLK 21) .,... ....... ...... -.. ..n.nn.n.n we "r ate n! A. eut a ne .• M^^ 4 nCl17 4 C-1CA 17 r T Iz7.4oT T T fi T Ila O 0.52P.0 0.92 L L 16 J- 053 /AC� 6o T .__ T T Q 14 LL Q ~ � 2 7 1,, JO 1 6iJ. AO 7J 7- 40 227. 40 3 /3 177 ' -O'E AVE %, POR PAR IA SBE MAP 804 -37 -9H 25 SHT 2 101 04/06/00 CHANGES ILK OLD NEW Y CUT 153 6 ijosIi / 6 341 753 5,41 11 ,13, 7 59,2 152 I - 6 8 -13 74 2769 153 ._ 6-111744274,5 PM 1O52 7 /D 15 -171 B2 1J2C 032 17 /6409.83 2512 2 e p SHT I Q nH6 VA➢ WAS PREPAFi® FOII ASSE59.@1T PLhE955A] CJ ASSLME0 FOR THE ACCURACY O 7hE DATA SHOW ./mot 0 LMAr NOT CO.IPLY WITH LOCAL SUSW6CN OR SEC 4 - T1 IS- R4W - POR NW 1, 4 7 -t7 n Q (MAP 524 - NO. LEUCAOIA - BLKS 20.27.34 & POR SLK 21) .,... ....... ...... -.. ..n.nn.n.n we "r ate n! A. eut a ne .• M^^ 4 nCl17 4 C-1CA N K:. loon 1 N 7F- �'I * -t 21 7,717 ov 2 /30 5 � r�s- rs•os'r A,,, Cy L.1 ` ,? srs.ts GeosA SHT 2 6.55 AC. I O 4 0 -nj V h � C 1 � 130 D R. Z' -� 5 i -.AT.. wA1 _ a SHT 2 o � � as O 0 "89 AC : 29 P.AR.T� M. "'Zo'/ /'f 26 PAR. 2 PM12782 SURF RD_ n10 w SHT 2 h L L rrs.7o cr•» �� IJS.ao N Tf i7 •7o'L C�u SANFORD ST. ? 254 -10 SHT I OF 2 100' CHANGES 3LKI OLD I NEWfYO CUT SEC 4 - T13S -R4W - POR NW 1/4 (MAP 524 — NO. LEUCAOIA — POR BLK 21) �� MAP 763 — N0. LEUCADIA REFILED ) v HILLCREST — LCI N74.57rs [go 1 !a6� 61 6.5 Lli jZ N,O PM 17252 Q NORTH LEUCADI NORTH LEUCADIA � O 15 5 � O Z TFL5 INP WAS R FOR ASSESSABIT Pl1 MES OILY, NO LIABLITY 6 PAR 1 a PAR 2 p Q ASSt►IH7 FOR 7HE ALQAkCT OF n£ DATA S W ASg RSA 4 `Id W ANY IOT CU�IY WffH LDCAL SU�6 V D h SIJS ,.7 ✓s > M 30 29 �{ 4.3 6S w PAR 4 PAR o 4 ry PM 17252 Il[3 N110 1 � .u�vst •r3 � 17 � M 5 2 /ia 1.03 AG. ..- -nr • 20' ii't ^ 19 n + a� /4,. 0, — N 74• S.6'10'4 O h F N 7F- �'I * -t 21 7,717 ov 2 /30 5 � r�s- rs•os'r A,,, Cy L.1 ` ,? srs.ts GeosA SHT 2 6.55 AC. I O 4 0 -nj V h � C 1 � 130 D R. Z' -� 5 i -.AT.. wA1 _ a SHT 2 o � � as O 0 "89 AC : 29 P.AR.T� M. "'Zo'/ /'f 26 PAR. 2 PM12782 SURF RD_ n10 w SHT 2 h L L rrs.7o cr•» �� IJS.ao N Tf i7 •7o'L C�u SANFORD ST. ? 254 -10 SHT I OF 2 100' CHANGES 3LKI OLD I NEWfYO CUT SEC 4 - T13S -R4W - POR NW 1/4 (MAP 524 — NO. LEUCAOIA — POR BLK 21) �� MAP 763 — N0. LEUCADIA REFILED ) LOT 2 2051 1972353.880 i S 14/46/26 E 98.51 2075 BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57141.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing 65.56 Distance N Coordinates E 1972241.602 6239566.173 LOT 1 N 14/46/26 W 98.58 Ci 2053 DEC 21 2000 101 6239541.036 N 1972376.024 6239687. S 15/03/13 E 98.41 -NGINEERING WWI( 100 1972353.880 6239604.363 1972280 .989 6239712 . citr of EN(. NIiAI "' S 74/56/42 W 86.08 S 2075 E 0.001 -0.000 1972258.631 6239629.482 N 14/46/26 W 98.51 2051 1972353.880 6239604.363 N 75/00/24 E 85.60 101 1972376.024 6239687.045 Closure: N 07131117 W 0.007 0.007 -0.001 Area = 8451.375 Sq Ft 0.1940 Acres LOT 2 2051 1972353.880 6239604.363 S 14/46/26 E 98.51 2075 1972258.631 6239629.482 S 74/56/42 W 65.56 2076 1972241.602 6239566.173 N 14/46/26 W 98.58 2053 1972336.920 6239541.036 N 75/00/24 E 65.56 2051 1972353.880 6239604.363 Closure: S 43/34/27 E 0.001 -0.000 0.000 Area = 6460.149 Sq Ft 0.148:3 Acres 1 I • 'n' 00 57142, D0 40 BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 3 2053 LOT 4 S 14/46/26 E 98.58 2076 S 74/56/42 W 72.00 2080 N 14/46/26 W 98.65 2028 N 75/00/24 E 72.00 2053 Closure: S 17/21/39 E 0.007 Area = 7100.288 Sq Ft LOT 4 1972336.920 6239541.036 1972241.602 6239566.173 1972222.900 6239496.644 1972318.293 6239471.487 1972336.920 6239541.036 -0.007 0.002 0.1630 Acres 1972318.293 6239471.487 1972222.900 6239496.644 1972207.315 6239438.702 1972302.770 6239413.529 1972318.293 6239471.487 0.005 -0.001 0.1359 Acres S 14/46/26 E 98.65 2080 S 74/56/42 W 60.00 2091 N 14/46/26 W 98.72 2056 N 75/00/24 E 60.00 2028 Closure: N 11/47/47 W 0.005 Area = 5921.179 Sq Ft 1972336.920 6239541.036 1972241.602 6239566.173 1972222.900 6239496.644 1972318.293 6239471.487 1972336.920 6239541.036 -0.007 0.002 0.1630 Acres 1972318.293 6239471.487 1972222.900 6239496.644 1972207.315 6239438.702 1972302.770 6239413.529 1972318.293 6239471.487 0.005 -0.001 0.1359 Acres C] M, 1972334.616 BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, I1 -22 -00 Point Bearing 60.33 Distance N Coordinates E LOT 5 1972276.282 2029 S 75/12/40 1972276.282 6239420.514 S 14/46/26 E 71.32 2091 1972242.701 6239293.318 1972207.315 6239438.702 S 74/56/42 W 131.22 2039 2179 1972300.964 1972173.231 6239311.985 N 15/02/27 W 71.93 2040 1972242.701 6239293.318 N 75/12/40 E 131.55 2029 N 78/56/21 1972276.282 6239420.514 Closure: 0.009 Area = 7945.006 S 72/53/15 W 0.004 -0.001 -0.003 Area = 9411.224 Sq Ft 0.2161 Acres LOT 6 2027 1972334.616 6239405.130 S 14/46/26 E 60.33 2029 1972276.282 6239420.514 S 75/12/40 W 131.55 2040 1972242.701 6239293.318 N 15/02/27 W 60.33 2039 1972300.964 6239277.662 N 75/12/40 E 131.84 2027 1972334.616 6239405.130 Closure= N 78/56/21 E 0.009 0.002 0.009 Area = 7945.006 Sq Ft 0.1824 Acres Y BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing 15/02/27 Distance N Coordinates E LOT 7 S 75/14/38 W 2055 2198 1972397.809 6239388.465 S 14/46/26 E 65.35 2196 2027 S 1972334.616 W 6239405.130 S 75/12/40 W 131.84 N 2039 W 53.11 2084 1972300.964 6239277.662 N 15/02/27 W 65.39 E 120.94 2093 2093 1972364.112 6239260.693 N 75/13/34 E 132.14 0.004 Area = 2055 Sq Ft 1972397.809 6239388.465 Closure: N 59/01/04 W 0.007 0.003 -0.006 Area = 8628.173 Sq Ft 0.1981 Acres LOT 8 2093 1972364.112 19722294.095 1972264.643 1972283.334 1972281.981 1972333.273 1972364.1122 -0.004 0.1989 Acr 6239260.693 6239279.507 6239167.690 6239162.667 6239157.537 6239143.754 6239260.693 0.001 's 5 15/02/27 E 72.50 2042 S 75/14/38 W 115.63 2198 N 15/02/27 W 19.35 2196 S 75/13/34 W 5.31 1000 N 15/02/27 W 53.11 2084 N 75/13/34 E 120.94 2093 Closure: S 17/26/24 E 0.004 Area = 8663.067 Sq Ft 1972364.112 19722294.095 1972264.643 1972283.334 1972281.981 1972333.273 1972364.1122 -0.004 0.1989 Acr 6239260.693 6239279.507 6239167.690 6239162.667 6239157.537 6239143.754 6239260.693 0.001 's Y BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 9 10 2198 2095 N 75/14/38 E 115. 2042 N 75/14/38 S 15/02/27 E 60. 2043 S 75/14/38 W 115. 2095 15/02/27 E 65. N 15/02/27 W 60. 2198 Closure: Flat S Area = 6937.822 Sq Ft LOT 10 2095 N 75/14/38 E 115. 2043 S 15/02/27 E 65. 2179 S 74/56/42 W 115. 2096 N 15/02/27 W 65. 2095 Closure: S 09/00/01 W O. Area = 7568.327 Sq Ft 63 00 63 00 63 15 63 75 003 1972264.643 6239167.690 1972294.095 6239279.507 1972236.150 6239295.078 1972206.698 6239183.260 1972264.643 6239167.690 0.1593 Acres 1972206.698 6239183.260 1972236.150 6239295.078 1972173.231 6239311.985 1972143.196 6239200.324 1972206.698 6239183.260 -0.003 -0.001 0.1737 Acres 1. BAY Lr'tUl'IL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 11 2192 N 75/13/34 E 2194 S 15/02/27 E 2096 S 74/56/42 W 2191 N 15/02/27 W 2192 Closure: N 39/58/28 W 1972220.345 6239106.075 71.00 1972236.450 6239174.728 98.63 71.00 98.98 0.002 Area = 7015.318 Sq Ft LOT 12 2193 N 75/13/34 E 2192 S 15/02/27 E 2191 S 74/56/42 W 2005 N 15/03/18 W 108 Arc center D= 5/20/19 L= S 09/42/59 E 200:3 N 15/02/27 W 2193 Closure: S 75/27/21 E 1972143.196 6239200.324 1972124.754 6239131.761 1972220.345 6239106.075 0.001 -0.001 0.1610 Acres 1972205.044 6239048.058 60.00 1972220.345 6239106.075 98.98 1972124.754 6239131.761 34.41 1972115.816 6239098.529 275.00 1972381.377 6239027.099 25.62 C= 25.61 ST= 12.82 275.00 1972110.322 6239073.511 98.08 1972205.044 6239048.058 0.003 Area =- 5937.561 Sq Ft -0.001 0.003 0.1:363 Acres v BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 13 W8181 N 75/13/34 E 209/ S 15/02/27 E 2003 N 09/42/59 W 108 Arc center D= 20/16/30 L= S 10/33/31 W 2006 N 10/33/30 E 2009 Arc center D= 64/24/02 L= S 74/57/33 W 2007 N 15/02/27 W 2100 Closure: N 42/28/55 W 1972182.172 6238942.890 107.50 1972209.585 6239046.837 102.78 1972110.322 6239073.511 275.00 1972381.377 6239027.099 97.31 L'= 96.81 ST= 49.17 275.00 1972111.033 6238976.708 25.00 1972135.610 6238981.289 28.10 C= 26.64 ST= 15.74 25.00 1972129.122 6238957.146 54.93 1972182.172 6238942.890 0.004 0.003 -0.003 Area = 9692.795 Sq Ft 0.2225 Acres LOT 14 2107 S 15/02/27 E 2100 N 75/13/34 E 2108 N 15/02/27 W 2163 S 75/13/34 W 210% Closure: Flat Area = 5899.006 Sq Ft 0.1354 Acres 1972240.117 6238927.319 60.00 1972182.172 6238942.890 98.32 1972207.243 6239037.957 60.00 1972265.188 6239022.386 98.32 1972240.117 6238927.319 Area = 5899.006 Sq Ft 0.1354 Acres BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E L.O1 15 2161 S 15/02/27 E 2107 N 75/13/34 E 2163 N 15/02/27 W 2203 S 75/13/34 W 2161 Closure: Flat 1972299.775 6238911.288 61.77 1972240.117 6238927.319 98.32 1972265.188 6239022.386 61.77 1972324.847 6239006.355 98.32 1972299.775 6238911.288 Area = 6073.413 Sq Ft LOT 16 2161 N 15/02/27 W 2078 N 74/45/39 E 1175 Arc center D= 72/59/14 L= N 32/15/07 W 1176 S 32/15/07 E 2020 Arc center D= 16/23/05 L= N 15/52/03 W 1179 S 15/02/27 E 2203 S 75/13/34 W 2161 Closure: S 76/55/31 W 0.1394 Acres 1972299.775 6238911.288 32.75 1972331.403 6238902.790 28.50 1972338.894 6238930.288 36.31 C= 33.90 ST= 21.08 28.50 1972362.997 6238915.079 278.00 1972127.890 6239063.432 79.50 C= 79.23 ST= 40.02 278.00 19722395.297 6238987.424 72.95 1972324.847 6239006.355 98.32 1972299.775 6238911.268 0.005 -0.001 - -0.004 Area = 6419.316 Sq Ft 0.1474 Acres BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11- 22 - -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates L LOT 17 1179 S 15/52/03 E 2020 Arc center D= 1/05/37 L= N 14/46/26 W 1177 N 75/13/34 E 2044 S 14/36/17 E 8. 2050 Arc center D= 89/29/14 L= N 74/52/57 E 2054 N 75/23/35 E 35. 2066 S 15/02/27 E 64. 2187 S 75/13/34 W 134. 2203 N 15/02/27 W 72. 1179 Closure: S 79/34/48 E 0. Area = 9533.291 Sq Ft 1972395.297 6238987.424 278.00 1972127.890 6239063.432 5.31 C= 5.31 ST= 2.65 278.00 1972396.699 62389'x: ?.:i41 86.14 1972418.665 6239075.832 50 1972410.439 6239077.975 13.28 C= 11.97 ST= 8.42 8.50 LOT 18 1972412.656 6239086.181 00 1972421.483 6239120.050 45 1972359.241 6239136.776 88 1972324.847 6239006.355 95 1972395.297 6238987.424 001 -0.000 0.001 2163 N 15/02/27 W 61.77 2203 N 75/13/34 E 134.88 2187 S 15102127 E 61.77 2188 S 75/13/34 W 134.88 2163 Closure: Flat Area = 8332.070 Sq Ft 0.2189 Acres 1972265.188 6239022.386 1972324.847 6239006.355 1972359.241 6239136.776 1972299.583 6239152.807 1972265.188 6239022.386 0.1913 Acres BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -2' -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 19 Area = 8930.390 Sq Ft LOT 20 2109 S 15/02/27 E 99.89 2031 S 75/13/34 W 65.31 2084 N 15/02/27 W 91.34 1972207.243 6239037.957 1972265.188 6239022.386 1972299.583 6239152.807 1972281.981 6239157.537 1972283.334 6239162.667 1972238.450 6239174.728 1972205.044 6239048.058 1972209.585 6239046.837 19722207.243 6239037.957 -0.007 0.012 0.2050 Acre: 1972446.395 6239180.979 1972349.926 6239206.901 1972333.273 6239143.754 2066 1972421.483 6239120.050 N 74/52/57 E 8.50 2068 Arc center 1972423.700 6239128.256 D= 90/11/15 L= 13.38 C= 12.04 ST= 8.53 N 14/55/48 W 8.50 2226 N 75/13/34 E 56.79 2109 Closure= N 88/10/28 W 0.004 Area 6507.734 Sq Ft 1972431.913 6 239126.066 1972446.395 6239180.979 0.000 - -0.004 0.1494 Acres N 15/02/27 W 60.00 2163 N 75/13/34 E 134.88 2188 S 15102127 E 18.23 1000 N 75/13/34 E 5.31 2196 S 15/02/27 E 46.48 2194 S 75/13/34 W 131.00 22193 N 15/02/27 W 4.70 2097 S 75/13/34 W 9.18 2108 Closure= S 59/54/26 E 0.014 Area = 8930.390 Sq Ft LOT 20 2109 S 15/02/27 E 99.89 2031 S 75/13/34 W 65.31 2084 N 15/02/27 W 91.34 1972207.243 6239037.957 1972265.188 6239022.386 1972299.583 6239152.807 1972281.981 6239157.537 1972283.334 6239162.667 1972238.450 6239174.728 1972205.044 6239048.058 1972209.585 6239046.837 19722207.243 6239037.957 -0.007 0.012 0.2050 Acre: 1972446.395 6239180.979 1972349.926 6239206.901 1972333.273 6239143.754 2066 1972421.483 6239120.050 N 74/52/57 E 8.50 2068 Arc center 1972423.700 6239128.256 D= 90/11/15 L= 13.38 C= 12.04 ST= 8.53 N 14/55/48 W 8.50 2226 N 75/13/34 E 56.79 2109 Closure= N 88/10/28 W 0.004 Area 6507.734 Sq Ft 1972431.913 6 239126.066 1972446.395 6239180.979 0.000 - -0.004 0.1494 Acres 4 BAY LAUREL. MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 21 2109 N 75/13/34 E 2110 S 15/02/27 E 2032 S 75/13/34 W 2031 N 15/02/27 W 2109 Closure= Flat Area = 5993.418 Sq Ft LOT 22 0.1376 Acres 2110 1972446.395 6239180.979 60.00 1972461.695 6239238.996 1972461.695 6239238.996 99.89 2111 1972365.2227 6239264.918 60.00 1972476.995 6239297.013 1972349.926 6239206.901 99.89 2033 1972446.395 6239180.979 Area = 5993.418 Sq Ft LOT 22 0.1376 Acres 2110 1972461.695 6239238.996 N 75/13/34 E 60.00 2111 1972476.995 6239297.013 S 15/02/27 E 99.89 2033 1972380.527 6239322.935 S 75/13/34 W 60.00 2032 1972365.227 6239264.918 N 15/02/27 W 99.89 2110 1972461.695 6239238.996 Closure: Flat Area = 5993.418 Sq Ft 0.1376 Acres BAY LAUREL_ MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11- -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 23 2111 N 75/13/34 E 2112 S 14/46/26 E 2055 S 75/13/34 W 2033 N 15/02/27 W 2111 Closure: N 88/27/54 E 1972476.995 6239297.013 68.24 1972494.396 6239362.993 99.89 1972397.809 6239368.465 67.77 1972380.527 6239322.935 99.89 1972476.995 6239297.013 0.005 0.000 0.005 Area = 6792.752 Sq Ft 0.1559 Acres LOT 24 2112 42/08/25 W 44.89 1972494.396 6239362.993 N 75/13/34 E 56.93 W 48.34 2177 1972508.914 6239418.044 W S 14/46/26 E 28.50 2176 Are center 1972481.356 6239425.312 D= 111/38/36 L= 55.53 C= 47.16 ST= 41.97 S 83/07/50 E 28.50 2175 1972477.948 6239453.607 S 83/07/50 E 41.50 2018 Arc center 1972472.984 6239494.809 D= 51/19/54 L.= 37.18 C= 35.95 ST= 19.94 S 45/32/16 W 41.50 2113 S 42/08/25 W 44.89 2086 S 74/37/12 W 48.34 2055 N 14/46/26 W 99.89 2112 Closure: S 8//10/52 W 0.006 Area = 7747.067 Sq Ft 1972443.916 6239465.190 1972410.629 6239435.071 1972397.809 6239388.465 1972494.396 6239362.993 -0.000 - -0.006 0.1778 Acres BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11- 22--00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 25 2113 N 45/32/16 E 2018 Arc center D= 28/24/02 L= S 17/08/14 W 2114 S 42/08/25 W 41. 2115 S 15/02/01 E 85. 2057 S 75/00/24 W 65. 2056 N 14/46/26 W 9B. 2055 N 74/37/12 E 48. 2086 N 42/08/25 E 44. 2113 Closure: S 05 /55/35 E O. Area = 7172.742 Sq Ft 1972443.916 6239465.190 41.50 1972472.984 6239494.809 20.57 C= 20.36 ST= 10.50 41.50 LOT 26 2114 N 17108114 E 2018 Arc center D= 46/10/56 L= S 29/02/42 E 2116 S 29/02/42 E 2117 S 15/02/01 E 2058 S 75/00/24 W 2057 N 15/02/01 W 2115 N 42/08/25 E 2114 Closure: N 04/24/29 E 1972443.916 6239465.190 005 -0.005 0.001 0.1647 Acres 1972433.327 6239482.581 41.50 1972472.984 6239494.809 33.45 C= 32.55 ST= 17.69 41.50 1972436.703 6239514.957 20.00 1972419.218 6239524.667 83.73 72.00 8_5.64 41.67 0.008 1972338.:352 6239546.386 1972319.726 6239476.8:37 1972402.430 6239454.625 1972433.327 6239482 .581 0.008 0.001 Area = 7171.268 Sq Ft 0.1646 Acres 1972433.327 6239482.581 67 1972402.430 6239454.625 64 1972319.726 6239476.837 54 1972302.770 6239413.529 29 1972397.809 6239388.465 34 1972410.629 6239435.071 89 1972443.916 6239465.190 005 -0.005 0.001 0.1647 Acres 1972433.327 6239482.581 41.50 1972472.984 6239494.809 33.45 C= 32.55 ST= 17.69 41.50 1972436.703 6239514.957 20.00 1972419.218 6239524.667 83.73 72.00 8_5.64 41.67 0.008 1972338.:352 6239546.386 1972319.726 6239476.8:37 1972402.430 6239454.625 1972433.327 6239482 .581 0.008 0.001 Area = 7171.268 Sq Ft 0.1646 Acres BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 27 2116 1972436.703 6239514.957 6239530.658 N 29/02/42 W 41.50 W 41.50 2018 Arc center 2018 1972472.984 6239494.809 D= 30/42/11 L= 22.24 C= 21.97 ST= 11.39 L= S 59/44/53 E 41.50 S 2118 E 41.50 1972452.076 6239530.658 S 72/09/14 E 54.45 1972471.274 6239536.274 2119 S 72/09/35 E 1972435.389 6239582.488 S 15/01/20 E 84.39 2051 6239581.297 N 1972353.880 6239604.363 83.64 S 75/00/24 W 60.02 2058 1972478.467 6239662.082 1972338.352 6239546.386 15/03/13 N 15/02/01 W 83.73 1189 2117 1972419.218 6239524.667 N 29/02/42 W 20.00 2.50 2116 1190 1972436.703 6239514.957 Closure: 62:39661.699 S 15/03/13 E 97.59 N 35/48/58 W 0.002 0.002 -0.001 Area = 6137.737 Sq Ft 0.1409 Acres LOT 28 2118 1972452.076 6239530.658 N 59/44/53 W 41.50 2018 Arc center 1972472.984 6239494.809 D= 27/53/24 L= 20.20 C= 20.00 ST= 10.30 S 87/38/17 E 41.50 2120 1972471.274 6239536.274 S 72/09/35 E 47.30 2121 1972456.784 6239581.297 N 74/58/31 E 83.64 2122 1972478.467 6239662.082 S 15/03/13 E 7.82 1189 1972470.913 6239664.113 S 74/56/47 W 2.50 1190 1972470.263 62:39661.699 S 15/03/13 E 97.59 101 1972:376.0 24 6239687.045 S 75/00/24 W 85.60 2051 1972353.880 6239604.36:3 N 15/01/20 W 84.39 2119 1972435.389 6239582.488 N 72/09/14 W 54.45 2118 1972452.076 6239530.658 Closure: S 32/56/19 W 0.007 - -0.005 -0.004 Area = 9992.347 Sq Ft 0.2294 Acres BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 29 2120 N 87138117 W 2018 Arc center D= 45/09/55 L= N 47/11148 E 2174 N 47/11/48 E 2173 Arc center D= 3/37/29 L= S 50/49/17 W 2123 N 74/58/31 E 2124 S 15/03/13 E 2122 S 74/58/31 W 2121 N 72/09/35 W 2120 Closure: S 43/02/31 E 1972471.274 6239536.274 41.50 1972472.984 6239494.809 32.71 C= 31.87 ST= 17.26 41.50 1972501.183 6239525.258 48.50 1972534.138 6239560.841 3.07 C= 3.07 ST= 1.53 48.50 1972503.498 6239523.22245 127.57 1972536.569 6239646.455 60.17 1972478.467 6239662.082 83.64 1972456.784 6239581.297 47.30 1972471.274 6239536.274 0.002 -0.001 0.001 Area = 6899.632 Sq Ft 0.1584 Acres LOT 30 2123 1972503.498 6239523.245 N 50/49/17 E 48.50 2173 Arc center 1972534.138 6239560.841 D= 26/14/27 L= 22.21 C= 22.02 ST= 11.30 S 77/03/44 W 48.50 2172 1972523.279 6239513.573 S 77/03/44 W 61.50 2016 Arc center 1972509.509 62:39453.634 D= 38/05/12 L= 40.88 C= 40.13 ST= 21.23 N 38/58/32 E 61.50 2125 1972557.320 6239492.317 N 74/58/31 E 143.46 2011 1972594.510 6239630.871 S 15/03/1:3 E 60.00 2124 1972536.569 6239646.455 S 74/58/:31 W 127.:7 2123 1972503.498 6239523.245 Closure= N 75/42/21 E 0.002 0.000 0.002 Area = 8013.374 Sq Ft 0.1840 Arses BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 31 S 86/29/48 W 182.50 2125 2049 Arc center 1972557.320 6239492.317 S 38/58/32 W 61.50 C= 36.64 ST= 18.41 2016 Arc center E 1972509.509 6239453.634 D= 7/29/54 L= 8.05 C= 8.04 ST= 4.03 N 31/28/39 E 61.50 16.98 2041 2047 1972561.959 6239485.747 N 31/28/39 E 8.50 2034 Arc center 1972569.209 6239490.185 D= 67/21/19 L= 9.99 C= 9.43 ST= 5.66 N 81/10/03 W 8.50 2026 1972570.514 6239481.786 N 81/10/03 W 217.50 2049 Arc center 1972603.910 62392266.865 D= 0/54/29 L= 3.45 C= 3.45 ST= 1.72 S 82/04/31 E 217.50 2021 1972573.924 6239482.288 S 23/58/54 W 70.50 2016 Arc center 1972509.509 6239453.634 D= 28/45/37 L= 35.39 C= 35.02 ST= 18.08 N 04/46/43 W 70.50 2216 1972579.764 6239447.761 N 82/23/49 W 182.50 2049 Arc center 1972603.910 6239266.865 D= 11/06/22 L= 35.38 C= 35.32 ST= 17.74 N 86/29/48 E 182.50 2094 1972615.062 6239449.024 N 86/29/48 E 35.00 2223 1972617.201 6239483.959 N 74/58/31 E 135.98 2127 1972652.451 6239615.288 S 15/03/13 E 60.00 2011 1972594.510 6239630.871 S 74/58/31 W 143.46 2125 1972557.320 62:39492.317 Closure: N 72/56/11 E 0.001 0.000 0.001 Area = 9957.852 Sq Ft 0.2286 Acres LOT 32 2094 1972615.062 6239449.024 S 86/29/48 W 182.50 2049 Arc center 1972603.910 6239266.865 D= 11/31/17 L= 36.70 C= 36.64 ST= 18.41 N 74/58/31 E 182.50 2213 1972651.221 6239443.126 N 15/01/29 W 16.98 2047 1972667.620 6239438.725 BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11- -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E 2047 N 74/58/31 E 166.5E 2010 1972710.800 6239599.595 S 15/03/13 E 60.42 2127 1972652.451 6239615.288 S 74/58/31 W 135.98 2223 1972617.201 6239483.959 S 86/29/48 W 35.00 2094 1972615.062 6239449.024 Closure: N 88/16/07 W 0.007 0.000 -0.007 Area = 10015.429 Sq Ft 0.2299 Acres BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11- 22 - -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 33 N 15/03/15 W 20.00 1096 2154 1972666.722 6239435.377 1972755.157 N 15/03/15 W 71.58 E 48.15 2059 2131 1972735.843 6239416.786 1972767.640 N 74/58/31 E 170.03 E 144.48 2060 2132 1972779.921 6239581.004 1972889.801 S 15/03/13 E 71.58 E 15.64 2010 2048 1972710.800 6239599.595 1972893.872 S 74/58/31 W 170.03 E 118.00 1096 2060 1972666.722 6239435.377 Closure: 6239581.004 S 74/58/31 W S 74/56/43 W 0.001 -0.000 -0.001 Area = 12170.451 Sq Ft 0.2794 Acres LOT 34 2059 1972735.843 6239416.786 N 15/03/15 W 20.00 2154 1972755.157 6239411.591 N 74/58/31 E 48.15 2131 1972767.640 6239458.099 N 32/16/30 E 144.48 2132 1972889.801 6239535.252 N 74/55/00 E 15.64 2048 1972893.872 6239550.357 S 15/03/13 E 118.00 2060 1972779.921 6239581.004 S 74/58/31 W 170.03 2059 1972735.843 6239416.786 Closure: S 59/37/51 W 0.011 -0.006 -0.010 Area = 101:38.184 Sq Ft 0.2327 Acres BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11- -22 -00 Paint Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 35 2154 N 15/03/15 W 1354 N 76/09/14 E 1356 N 57/58/54 E 1357 N 74/55/00 E 2132 S 32/16/30 W 2131 S 74/58/31 W 22154 Closure: 1972755.157 6239411.591 79.50 1972831.926 6239390.943 19.00 1972836.473 6239409.395 64.33 1972870.582 6239463.941 73.86 1972889.801 6239535.252 144.48 1972767.640 6239458.099 48.15 1972755.157 6239411.591 N 35/48/20 E 0.008 0.007 0.005 Area = 8982.085 Sq Ft 0.2062 Acres LOT 36 2134 1972640.872 6239337.306 N 75/14/01 E 101.42 1096 1972666.722 6239435.377 N 74/58/31 E 3.47 2047 1972667.620 6239438.725 S 15/01/29 E 16.98 2213 1972651.221 6239443.126 S 74/58/31 W 182.50 2049 Arc center 1972603.910 6239266.865 D= 22/37/40 L= 72.07 C= 71.61 ST= 36.51 S 82/23/49 E 182.50 2216 1972579.764 6239447.761 S 04/46/43 E 70.50 2016 Arc center 1972509.509 6239453.634 D= 43/14/14 L= 53.20 C= 51.95 ST= 27.94 N 48/00/57 W 70.50 2217 1972556.669 6239401.229 N 48/00/57 W 39.50 2225 Arc: center 1972583.091 6239371.868 D= 33/14/31 L= 22.92 C= 22.60 ST= 11.79 S 14/46/26 E 39.50 2218 1972544.897 6,239381.940 S 75/13/34 W 18.20 2185 19/2540.256 6239364.344 N 15/0-:/28 W 104.18 2134 1972640.872 6239337.306 Closure: S 34/50/57 F 0.006 -0.005 0.00=5 Area = 9549.575 Sq Ft 0.2192 Acres BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bear inq Distance N Coordinates E LOT 37 2136 1972622.520 6239267.663 N 75114101 E 72.00 2134 1972640.872 6239337.306 S 15/02/28 E 104.18 2165 1972540.256 6239364.344 S 75/13/34 W 722.00 2135 1972521.896 62239294.723 N 15/02/28 W 104.19 2136 1972622.520 6239267.683 Closure: N 19/228/14 W 0.001 0.001 -0.000 Area = 7501.634 Sq Ft 0.1722 Acres LOT 38 2035 N 75/14/01 E 2136 S 15/02/28 E 2135 S 75/13/34 W 2137 N 15/02/28 W 2035 Closure: N 16/01/57 W 1972607.227 6239209.664 60.00 1972622.520 6239267.683 104.19 1972521.896 6239294.723 60.00 1972506.596 6239236.706 104.20 1972607.227 6239209.664 0.002 0.002 -0.001 Area = 6251.884 Sq Ft 0.1435 Acres BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 39 2036 Area = 6252.348 Sq Ft LOT 40 2014 N 74/57/29 E 1084 S 29/28/39 E 2036 S 15/02/28 E 2139 S 75/13/34 W 2141 N 15/02/28 W 2014 Closure: N 54/26/19 E 57.79 8.87 104.21 60.00 1972591.935 1972607.227 1972506.596 1972491.295 1972591.935 0.002 0.1435 Acres 6239151.645 6239209.664 6239236.706 6239178.699 623915I.645 -0.001 1972584.658 6239091.472 1972599.655 6239147.281 1972591.935 6239151.645 1972491.295 6239178.689 1972475.995 6239120.672 112.52 1972584.658 6239091.472 0.002 0.001 0.002 Area = 6750.005 Sq Ft 0.1550 Acres N 75/14/01 E 60.00 2035 S 15/02/28 E 104.20 2137 S 75/13/34 W 60.00 2139 N 15/02/28 W 104.21 2036 Closure: N 16/01/57 W 0.002 Area = 6252.348 Sq Ft LOT 40 2014 N 74/57/29 E 1084 S 29/28/39 E 2036 S 15/02/28 E 2139 S 75/13/34 W 2141 N 15/02/28 W 2014 Closure: N 54/26/19 E 57.79 8.87 104.21 60.00 1972591.935 1972607.227 1972506.596 1972491.295 1972591.935 0.002 0.1435 Acres 6239151.645 6239209.664 6239236.706 6239178.699 623915I.645 -0.001 1972584.658 6239091.472 1972599.655 6239147.281 1972591.935 6239151.645 1972491.295 6239178.689 1972475.995 6239120.672 112.52 1972584.658 6239091.472 0.002 0.001 0.002 Area = 6750.005 Sq Ft 0.1550 Acres BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing 74/58/09 Distance N Coordinates E LOT 41 N 2012 W 7.70 1035 1972565.972 6239021.939 N 74/57/29 E 72.00 60.06 2012 2014 1972584.658 6239091.472 E S 15/02/28 E 112.52 2141 S 75/13/34 W 65.00 1972475.995 6239120.672 S 75/13/34 W 72.00 15/02/28 W 2143 2146 1972457.634 6239051.052 Closure: N 15/02/28 W 112.18 5S/59/01 E 2012 Area = 7243.778 Sq Ft 1972565.972 6239021.939 Closure= S 28/59/24 E 0.003 -0.003 0.002 Area = 8089.169 Sq Ft 0.1857 Acres LOT 42 2146 1972541.668 1972542.953 1972550.386 1972565.972 1972457.634 1972441.059 I972541.668 0.005 0.1663 Acr 6238961.164 6238965.950 6238963.940 6239021.939 6239051.052 6238988.200 6238961.164 0.008 93 N 74/58/09 E 4.96 1073 N 15/07/39 W 7.70 1035 N 74/57/29 E 60.06 2012 S 15/02/28 E 112.18 2143 S 75/13/34 W 65.00 2145 N 15/02/28 W 104.18 2146 Closure: N 5S/59/01 E 0.010 Area = 7243.778 Sq Ft 1972541.668 1972542.953 1972550.386 1972565.972 1972457.634 1972441.059 I972541.668 0.005 0.1663 Acr 6238961.164 6238965.950 6238963.940 6239021.939 6239051.052 6238988.200 6238961.164 0.008 93 4 BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 43 2148 N 74/58/09 E 60.00 2146 S 15/02/28 E 104.18 2145 S 75/13/34 W 60.00 2147 N 15/02/28 W 103.91 2148 Closure: S 50/04/29 E 0.001 Area = 6242.602 Sq Ft LOT 44 2159 N 74/58/09 E 2146 S 15/02/28 E 2147 S 75/13/34 W 2171 S 14/46/21 E 2013 Arc center D= 12/58/50 L= N 27/45/11 W 2103 N 27/45/11 W 2160 N 15/02/28 W 2159 Closure: N 66/08/01 W 60.16 10:3.91 42.12 1972526.107 1972541.668 1972441.059 1972425.758 1972526.107 -0.001 0.1433 Acres 6238903.217 6238961.164 6238988.200 6238930.183 6238903.217 0.001 1972510.505 6238845.116 1972526.107 6238903.217 1972425.758 6238930.183 1972415.019 6238889.459 70.50 1972346.849 6238907.435 15.97 C= 15.94 ST= 8.02 70.50 1972409.239 6238874.606 10.00 1972418.088 6238869.950 95.70 1972510.505 6238845.116 0.005 0.002 -0.005 Area = 6245.734 Sq Ft 0.1434 Acres BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11- 22 --00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E LOT 45 2151 N 74/58/09 E 71.84 2159 S 15/02/28 E 95.70 2160 S 27/45/11 E 10.00 2103 1972491.874 6238775.733 1972510.505 6238845.116 1972418.088 6238869.950 1972409.239 6238874.606 S 27/45/11 E 70.50 2013 Arc center 1972346.849 6238907.435 D= 38/30/49 L= 47.39 C= 46.50 ST= 24.63 N 66/16/00 W 70.50 2102 1972375.224 6238842.898 N 66/44/27 W 44.08 2038 N 15/02/28 W 102.77 2151 Closure: N 68/40/17 W 0.002 Area = 8328.561 Sq Ft LOT 46 2022 N 74/58/09 E 61.65 2151 S 15/02/28 E 102.77 2038 S 66/44/27 E 44.08 2102 S 66/16/00 E 70.50 2013 Arc center D= 20/08/11 L= N 86/24/11 W 2071 N 66/44/27 W 2023 N 15/02/28 W 8�i 2022 Closure: S 26/55/41 E 1972392.630 6238802.402 1972491.874 6238775.733 0.001 -0.002 0.1912 Acres 1972475.886 6238716.193 1972491.874 6238775.733 1972392.630 62238802.402 1972375.224 6238842.898 1972346.849 6238907.435 24.78 C= 24.65 ST= 12.52 70.50 1972351.272 6238837.074 107.55 .06 0.004 1972393.742 62387:38.266 1972475.886 62:38716.193 -0.003 0.002 Area = 7614.396 Sq Ft 0.1748 Acres Y BAY LAUREL MAP CLOSURES, 57142.00, MSB, 11 -22 -00 Point Bearing Distance N Coordinates E PARK SITE 2067 1972416.042 6238493.333 N 74/58/09 E 230.75 2022 1972475.886 6238716.193 S 15/02/28 E 85.06 2023 1972393.742 6238738.266 S 66/44/27 E 107.55 2071 1972351.272 6238837.074 S 86/24/11 E 70.50 2013 Arc center 1972346.849 6238907.435 D= 51/48/26 L= 63.75 C= 61.60 ST= 34.24 S 41/47/24 W 70.50 2186 1972294.285 6238860.454 S 41/47/24 W 40.00 2170 Arc center 1972264.461 6238833.798 D= 33/10/09 L= 23.16 C= 222.83 ST= 11.91 N 74/57/33 E 40.00 2169 1972274.841 6238872.428 S 15/02/27 E 121.24 2002 1972157.754 6238903.891 S 74/57/33 W 25.00 2001 Arc center 1972151.266 6238879.747 D= 106/01/54 L= 46.27 C= 39.94 ST= 33.20 S 00/59/26 W 25.00 2000 1972126.270 6238879.315 S 00/59/26 W 325.00 106 Arc center 1971801.319 6238873.696 D= 16/01/229 L= 90.90 C= 90.60 ST= 45.75 N 15/02/03 W 325.00 2063 1972115.194 6238789.393 S 74/57/57 W 185.59 2156 1972067.053 6238610.156 N 15/02/03 W 22.00 2157 Are center 1972088.300 6238604.449 D= 89/57/02 L= 34.54 C= 31.10 ST= 21.98 S 74/54/59 W 22.00 2158 1972082.575 6238583.207 N 15/05/01 W 345.37 2067 1972416.042 6238493.333 C105UTe.: N 75/30/11 W 0.005 0.001 -0.004 Area = 108404.745 Sq Ft 2.4886 Acres 09/05/01 09:11 V909 693 ?0 SB&0 - Im001 /004 131 6 q)ks ( S �J �� 7�5� /71L �t)�hn/i5rt It (� FAX TRANSMITTAL Q� O PLEASE DELIVER TO THE PERSON THANK YEOD BELOW AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. (SBB &( O. INC. FAX NO. 76o -633- 2AP FROM: AdnJ OieO[J��E DATE: 9'�-G� JOB NO. 37i{2- 9O TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET. -7 Land RE: &4y G/1L//LEZ - /J�vOii4E�j you r� Ganes Planning COMMENT& Sfv jo"��Aw 4''S rdQP�tUyv4 Sr/�t/ TFw77Nrv� fs�1.f►° G`.w. -.wr PE-Bvr� 4 /PpwvzoV&4, Civil %�Gf JF �/1bt, /i%� 7-0 Q 116V11- Engineering cc: Land IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS RECEIVING THIS FAX, PLEASE CALL (909) 693 -3310. Swi'vYing FOR SB&O IN -HOUSE USE ONLY OPERATOR TO BE RETURNED: TO BE FILED w:%ADMB4T0R WAX- F0XM.W0 k,w.bm 25, 2000 Corporate OfFiee: 3615 Kearny Villa Koa(1 Suitc 2014 San Diego. C A 92123 4 Phone (858) 560 -1141 Fax (858) 56()- %157 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 120 4 Rancho Cucamonga. C'A 91730 1 Phone (909) 949.3450 Fa.x (909) 948.2750 27715 Icflcrson A%cnuc, Suitc 201 * Temecula. CA 92590 4 Phone (909) 693 -331(1 Fax (909) 693 -3320 09/05/01 09:11 V909 893 '0 SB &O 09/052001 06: 4E SOUTM. CONSTRUCTION CO INC a 19096933- Southwest Z002/004 NO.526 D01 Carar=c on Co.. Inc. 2909 Rainbow Valley Blvd Fa %mk Ca. 92028 (760} 7283460 Fax(760)7294649 Lit 1/465118 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL DATE: q ~r - o I FROM: ANDY JOHNSON PLEA5E DEUVER THE FOLLOWIINNO PAGES TO: NAME: U k"i - COMPANY: NUM5EK OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): PLEASE CALL IF YOU PC NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES. ME55AGE: 1 A�(,Sa Se..`� 06 Ca.8 , a L G CA- 6 THANK YOU. 09/05/01 09:11 $909 693 3320 SB &O 09�05i2001 0E:4C SOUTHWEST CONSTRUCTION CC INC � 19096935320 r � o F V X z A-1 y� O L' s 2003/004 NO. 526 IP02 E� � � D 0 .}1 � n r s .JUN -21-E 05:15PM FROM -SUO T -974 P 01/09 F -372 Amendment #1 DRAINAGE & DETENTION BASIN REPORT BAY LAUREL SU13DMSION ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: GREYSTONE HOMES, INC SAN DIEGO DIVISION 5780 FLEET STREET, SUITE 300 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 (760) 804 -7717 Prepared by: SB &O, INC. 3615 KEARNEY VILLA ROAD, SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123 (858) 560 -1141 SB &O JOB NO. 54712.90 L eU ra. c 47,107 1 ,4r F cAu � FpF CAllk� JUN -21 -01 05:15PN FROM -SHO T -974 P 02/09 F -372 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................... ......................1 INTERIM DRAINAGE CONDITION ............ ............................... 1 METHODOLOGY ........................... ............................... 1 25 YEAR ANALYSIS ........................ ............................... 2 CONCLUSION............................... ..............................2 WI HEADLOSS CALCULATIONS 25 YEAR DETENTION BASIN CALCULATIONS PRELIMINARY PROFILE &W1424tpoMblw ll.apd 'JUN -21 -01 O5:16PM FROM -SUO Introduction T -974 P 03/09 F-372 The purpose of this report is to document an interim drainage condition for the Bay Laurel project in the City of Encinitas. The project storm drain system was originally designed to discharge to the existing drainage channel located west of Vulcan Ave and adjacent to the railroad tracks. During construction, it was discovered that the gas main is located at a depth which will interfere with the proposed channel connection. The anticipated schedule for relocation is on the order of 6-9 months. The current pace of construction will necessitate an interim solution until the relocation occurs. This report will document the interim conditions and estimate the design frequency storm That may be accommodated. Interim Drainage Connection. The location and depth of the existing gas line precludes the planned 30" pipe to channel connection. The interim solution is to construct a discharge structure immediately upstream of the gas line. A 6" diameter low flow pipe will connect to the channel under the gas main, while a channel will be excavated 1 foot above. The temporary structure will be a modified A -4 cleanout with a 4' wide by 12" high weir opening. The remainder of the project storm drain system, including the detention basin and the curb inlet on Vulcan will be constructed as designed. When the gas main relocation is complete the designed 30" connection may be completed by removing the temporary structure. This proposed system will allow the nuisance flows to be discharged to the channel. Larger storm flows will require the system to flow under pressure in order to reach the weir elevation. Methodolotry The original design for the detention basin was for a 100 year design event and was constrained by a lack of head from the bottom of the detention basin to the channel. The detention basin floor was driven by the design of the subdivision and the planned bio- Swale. Discharge from the detention basin is regulated by a controls structure with an small orifice at elevation 57.0 and the large weir at elevation 58.2. The outlet structure is connected to a 30" outfall pipe at elevation 54.69, which continues west to a cleanout, which contributes flows from the Vulcan curb inlet, and the continues directly to the channel. Fortunately, the elevation of Vulcan (59.2) is well above the floor of the detention basin and dui not pose a constraint. The combination of the original design and the interim connection imposes a number of constraints, chiefly the lack of available head from the bottom of the detention basin (57.0) to the temporary weir elevation (56.0). Several Trial error solutions indicate that flows from the detention basin will be significantly constrained by this condition. Neither the 50 or 100 year event was controlled in the interim condition. The allowable flow is approximately equal to the design flow for the original 25 year analysis. JUN -21 -01 O5:16PM FROM -S8iO 25 Year Storm Analysis T -974 P 04109 F -372 The control section for the analysis is the detention basin control structure. The analysis begins by setting the water surface elevation equal to the bottom of the upper weir, and increasing the elevation until the desired flow rate is achieved. Under this condition, the system will flow under pressure. Headloss calculations are performed for each down stream reach and include the addition of flows from the Vulcan inlet. Discharge is then calculated on a trial and error energy balance for both the 6" low flow and the weir. The calculation confirm that the maximum discharge under these conditions is 22.0 cfs at an elevation of 58.5 (This is 0.3 above the lower weir elevation). This analysis assumed that 1 foot of water would be present in the existing channel. The second check is to verify detention basin performance under the above scenario. The discharge rating of the control structure was revised to eliminate all flows from the lower orifice and to recalculate the weir discharge to reflect the backwater condition. These revisions are extremely conservative, since storm water flow will discharge from the lower orifice until the system reached The above backwater conditions. The locution basin :catalysis assumes that no flows are discharge from the basin until storage reaches the elevation of the upper detention basin weir opening. Discharge routing of the 25 year storm using the revised model indicates that the maximum storage elevation would be approx 60.6, which is well below the overflow elevation of 62.5. The peak discharge rate will be 21.7 cfs, which is slightly less than the 22 cfs predicted by above headloss equations. Therefore, the interim system will perform satisfactorily during a 25 year event. The adjusted discharge rate will be 21.7 cfs with an estimated storage elevation of 60.6. Conclusion The conservative analyses indicate that the proposed interim storm drain system will be capable of discharging the 25 year storm The interim solution is to construct a discharge structure immediately upstream of the gas line. A 6" diameter low flow pipe will connect to the channel under the gas train, while a channel will be excavated I foot above. The temporary structure will be a modified A -4 cleaaout with a 4' wide by 12" high weir opening. The remainder of the project storm drain system, including the detention basin and the curb inlet on Vulcan will be constructed as designed. This proposed system will allow the nuisance flows to be discharged to the channel. Larger storm flows will require the system to flow under pressure in order to reach the weir elevation. When the gas train relocation is complete the designed 30" connection may be completed by removing the temporary structure. BAY LAUREL - CITY OF ENCINITAS 25 YEAR STORM - INTERIM CONDMONS :1114wN L1U /JV YI110i CO TO TEMP CO 23.14 30 2.50 4.91 7.85 0.62 0.013 0.32% 36 D.11 D.10 4.7 0.34 0.1 57.42 57.77 WEIR @ OUTLET 21.66 4'X 12" 4.00 5.4 0.46 TEMP CO TO CHANNEL 1.48 6 0.50 0.20 1.57 0.13 0.013 6.95% 30 2.09 0.33 7.5 0.88 01 54.47 55.35 EXISTING HGL IN CHANNEL 54.47 54.47 FLOWLINE OF EXISTING CHANNEL = 53.47 O CIA DEPTH AREA VV R n FRICTION LENGTH FRICTION OTHER V V'2 PIPE HGL EGL SLOPE LOSS LOSS 2g TRAVEL Control Structure FL= 54.7 4.49 0.31 58.50 58.50 DETENTION BASIN 22.04 30 2.50 4.91 7.85 0.62 0.013 0.29% 42 0.42 0.10 4.5 0.31 0.2 57.67 57.98 VULACAN AVE INLET 1.93 ADJUST A6Tc FOR T= 1.10 CO TO TEMP CO 23.14 30 2.50 4.91 7.85 0.62 0.013 0.32% 36 D.11 D.10 4.7 0.34 0.1 57.42 57.77 WEIR @ OUTLET 21.66 4'X 12" 4.00 5.4 0.46 TEMP CO TO CHANNEL 1.48 6 0.50 0.20 1.57 0.13 0.013 6.95% 30 2.09 0.33 7.5 0.88 01 54.47 55.35 EXISTING HGL IN CHANNEL 54.47 54.47 FLOWLINE OF EXISTING CHANNEL = 53.47 JUN-21 -01 05:17PM FROM -SB&O T -974 P 06/09 F -372 BAY LAUREL DETENTION BASIN ROUTING M� O wl - 25.9 25 YEAR EVENT - 6 HOUR TYPE "B" STORM INTERIM CONDITIONS 0.82 2949 ON OIN 2S1dt -0 swage swage Delenlim Oudb+. ourlo AdjuSWd lnd.caui chw9e Swrage Volume (cfs) (ofs) Ouanury d5 (cf) (cfs) (cf) 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 O o0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 o.o0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0,00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0,00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0,00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0,00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0,00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 000 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 21.84 17.85 18 18 3,213 3,213 0.00 0 36.08 29.49 59 65 7,988 11.201 2.96 1,055 36.08 29.49 87 118 7,235 18,437 15.82 6,761 36.08 2949 107 146 4,294 22,730 1930 13,710 36.08 29.49 123 166 3239 25,969 21.68 21,516 9.50 7.76 118 160 (999) 24,970 21.11 29.117 9.50 7.76 97 133 (4245) 20,725 17.99 35,594 9.50 7.76 83 113 (3,150) 17,574 15.03 41,005 9.50 7.76 75 98 (2,016) 15,556 11.69 45.214 9.50 7.76 70 90 (1,107) 14,450 9.98 48,808 7.50 6.21 68 84 (788) 13,662 827 51.819 7.60 6.21 66 80 (503) 13,159 6.85 54.284 7.60 6.21 65 79 (230) 12,929 6.85 66,749 7.60 6.21 67 77 24 12.953 5.43 58,705 7.60 5.21 65 79 24 12,978 6.86 61,170 4,75 3.88 64 75 (395) 12,583 5.43 63,125 4,75 3.88 61 72 (659) 12,024 5.43 65.082 4.75 3.88 61 69 (325) 11,599 4.13 66,570 4,75 3.88 60 69 (91) 11,608 4.13 68,058 4.75 3.88 60 68 (91) 11.517 4.13 69,546 4.75 3.88 59 68 (91) 11,425 4.13 71,034 4.75 3.88 59 67 (91) 11,334 4.13 72,522 4.75 3.88 61 67 120 11,466 2.96 73,587 4.75 3.88 60 68 120 11,575 4.13 75,075 4.75 3.88 60 68 (91) 11,484 4.13 76,563 3.80 3.10 61 67 (19) 11,465 296 77,628 3.80 3.10 59 67 (159) 11.306 4.13 79,116 3.80 3.10 59 65 (159) 11,147 2.96 80,180 3.80 3.10 59 65 53 11200 2.96 81,245 3.80 3.10 60 65 53 11,262 2.96 82,310 3.80 3.10 50 66 53 11,305 2.96 83,375 3.80 3.10 60 66 53 11,358 2.96 86,439 3.80 3.10 60 66 53 11,411 2.96 85,504 3.80 3.10 61 67 53 11,463 2.96 86,569 3.80 3.10 59 67 (159) 11,304 4.13 88057 3.80 3.10 59 65 (159) 11.146 2.96 89.122 3 80 3.10 59 65 53 11,198 2.96 90.186 180 110 60 65 63 11,251 2.96 91,251 3.80 310 60 fib 53 11,304 2.96 92,316 180 3.10 60 66 53 11,356 2.96 93,381 0.00 0.00 57 63 (606) 10.850 2.96 94,445 0.00 0.00 53 57 (878) 9,972 1.92 95.137 0.00 0.00 51 63 (534) 9438 1.05 95,513 JUN -21 -01 05:17PM1 FROM -SRO T -374 P 07/C6 F -372 BAY LAUREL DETENTION BASIN BASIN STORAGE VOLUMES INTERIM CONDITIONS DEPTH ELEVATION WIDTH LENGTH AREA STORAGE 2Smt -0 OUTFLOW (FT) (SF) (CF) (CFS) 0.00 57.00 0.00 90.00 0 0 0 0.0 0.10 57.10 15.30 90.30 1,382 69 0 0.0 0.20 57.20 30.60 90,60 2,772 277 2 0.0 0.30 57.30 45.90 90.90 4.172 624 3 0.0 0.40 57.40 61.20 91.20 5,581 1,112 5 0.0 0.50 57.50 51.80 91.80 5,673 1,674 9 0.0 0.60 57.60 62.40 9240 5.766 2,246 12 0.0 0.70 57.70 63.00 93.00 5,859 2,828 16 0.0 0.80 57.80 63.60 93.60 5,953 3,418 19 0.0 0.90 57.90 64.20 94.20 6,048 4,018 22 0.0 1.00 58.00 64.80 94.80 6,143 4,628 26 0.0 1.10 58.10 65.40 95.40 6,239 5,247 29 0.0 1.20 58.20 65,00 96.00 6,336 5,876 33 0.0 1.30 58.30 66.60 96.60 6.434 6.514 36 0.0 1.40 58.40 67.20 97.20 6,532 7,162 40 0.0 1.50 58.50 67.80 97.80 6,631 7,821 43 0.0 1.60 58.60 68.40 98.40 6,731 8,489 48 0.4 1.70 58.70 69.00 99.00 6,831 9,167 52 1.0 1.80 58.80 69.60 99.60 6,932 9,855 57 1.9 1.90 58.90 70.20 100.20 7,034 10,553 52 3.0 2.00 59.00 70.80 100.80 7,137 11,262 67 4.1 2.10 59.10 71.40 101.40 7,240 11,981 72 5.4 2.20 59.20 72.00 102.00 7.344 12,710 77 6.8 2.30 59.30 72.60 102.60 7,449 13,449 83 8.4 2.40 59.40 73.20 103.20 7,554 14,199 89 10.0 2.50 59.50 73.80 103.80 7,660 14,960 95 11.7 2.60 59.60 74.40 104.40 7,767 15,732 101 13.3 2.70 59.70 75.00 105.00 7,875 16,514 106 14.2 2.80 59.80 75.60 105.60 7,983 17,307 111 15.0 2.90 59.90 76.20 106.20 8,092 18,110 116 15.8 3.00 60.00 76.80 106.80 8,202 18,925 122 16.6 3.10 60.10 77.40 107.40 8,313 19,751 127 17.3 3.20 60.20 78.00 108.00 8,424 20,588 132 18.0 3.30 60.30 78.60 108.60 8,536 21,436 138 18.7 3.40 60.40 79.20 109.20 8,649 22,295 143 19.3 3.50 60.50 79.80 109.BO 8,762 23,166 149 19.9 360 60.60 80.40 110.40 8,876 24,047 154 20.5 3.70 60.70 81.00 111.00 8,991 24.941 160 21.1 3.80 60.80 81.60 111.60 9,107 25,846 165 21.7 3.90 60.90 8120 112.20 9,223 26,762 171 22.2 4.00 61.00 82.80 112.80 9,340 27,690 177 22.8 4.10 61.10 83.40 113.40 9.458 28,630 182 23.3 4.20 61.20 84.00 114.00 9,576 29,582 188 23.8 4.30 61.30 84.60 114.60 9,695 30,545 194 24.3 4.40 61.40 85.20 115.20 9,815 31,521 200 24.8 4.50 61.50 85.80 115.80 9,936 32,508 206 25.3 4.60 61.60 86.40 116.40 10.057 33,508 212 25.8 4.70 61.70 87.00 117.00 10,179 34,520 218 26.3 4.80 61.80 87.60 117.60 10,302 35,544 224 26.7 4.90 61.90 8820 118.20 10,425 35,580 230 27.2 5.00 62.00 88.80 118.80 10,549 37.629 237 27.6 5.10 62.10 89.40 119.40 10,674 38,690 243 28.1 5.20 62.20 90.00 120.00 10,800 39,764 249 28.5 5.30 6230 90.60 120.60 10,926 40,850 256 28.9 5.40 62.40 91.20 121.20 11,053 41,949 262 29.3 5.50 6250 91.80 121.80 11,181 43,061 269 29.8 U` LLM\' i ti . OFI 09/05/01 15:48 V909 69? -120 SB &O Z001/003 SB &0 SB &O, INC. Civil Engineering FAX TRANSMITTAL PLEASE DELIVER TO THE PERSON LISTED BELOW AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THANK YOU. S QEcv../ CO: FAX NO. &&7"") FROM: i7Y�OV/I —lG F DATE: —V JOB NO. TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: RE: * y 1�aL//Z,� - -r COMMENTS: B/L J, 61Z &W, V �%�� 57� 'ice T/Lt�/STL✓E j/y/ES %Ld— 6?4 -766 �(�/f7�L�i r /rarPfGN Grimy aF- E.�.�rvaiT 7�0- 63� -�8/f5 ✓�✓a� Te�fG 7 - �aG✓fs� ��- er��✓ %E�i— � -86� gQ s/ 0 8Se - Savo - �1 r7 cc: — Lund IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS RECEIVING THIS FAX, PLEASE CALL (909) 693 -3310. SumvYing FOR SB&O IN -HOUSE USE ONLY OPERATOR TO BE RETURNED: TO BE FILED W:\ADN(LW0RMS - AX•FORM.wpd Sq, mb" M, 2000 Corporate Office: 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suitc 201• San l)iegn, CA 92123 • Phone (858) 560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -9157 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 120 • Rancho Cucamonga, ("A 91730 • Phone (909) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 .IoTeNon Avenue. Suite 201 • Temecula, CA 92540 • Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909) 693 -3320 AA 09/05/01 15:49 a- $'909 69.1 -120 SB&0 2002/003 Ar ........ /fir -� /o-A -(Oeqa"'-Q26:� '(� c� c�e�wnr.,�,•. /• S' �f � f35°EL�7� IlY�AlIl7 ,�(I,R"El�Anvvv sffo)m ON P44N 7 7.5 � . savor, R °0.5 � R -2.5 �/' �`'+y PURAPS" ON? M RL R =0.5' VARIOUS SUBCOAMAC m 70 COMPMr nW IX c .*/VD7E: ONLY H?1ERE � •�':. ' .. = -' . n REt7U /Rm 7U HAAME • . J b y SANY DR41N RUNOFF �^ pRESPONS /[ E P. A D£TA /L / xr FARE n N MODAMO 6` RmLEp cwo* RAVE RESl 1 AM 7D JQVW AMAED IN S1E'7AW o DESYBN /S Gl7EvM7BV n D,5 too / l/NDE/PS7XfbD 77(AT i n Yu ELEYAAON SY10H7V f , ON Rl,4N 7NE cw Of Eman"513 - AS FAA, O HOA ° R=0.5' PL R�L6' �� z / f IP�QS' Z Bl^ u AE7ER R. 110 •O RQE. 44f71 , n • •• ^ r MIS KFlRNY MIA A 1n .9W Raw, CW (;WAf/ m B DE7A /L QD /F /ED 4 \ ll san -r741 LA i NOT m 5Y:4LE CURB W ENCINWAS FIRE PROTECRON DISTRICT SEWER AOFNCY COMMUNfIY OEVELOPMENf ,��` �y�� ENC/N/TAS /1J4RY D/S7RlL^T �.�LClII�L1 9Y: BY �+ DATE a 4 DI DATE: DATE 5L2.33 z REVISIONS JAPPROVED I DATE I REFERENCES DATE BENCHMARK �DESCRIPTIDN- TOP OF- BRASS OISI( IN WELL MONUMENT g LJ sB &0 SB &O, INC. Land Planning February 5, 2002 Job No. 57143.00 CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 RE: Bay Laurel Engineer's Pad Certification for TM No. 98 -240 Grading Permit No. 6775 -G Pursuant to Section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for Lots 36 -39. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading for these units has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. 23.24.3 10 (B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Lot No. Pad Elevation ner Plan As -built Pad Elevation 36 87.2 87.2 37 82.2 82.2 38 78.1 78.1 39 73.5 73.5 Civil Please contact me if you have any questions. Engineering Sincerely, `OppOFESSiCN �e �J. oq 9� < SB &O, INC. �•�` Op No. 47677 m n+ * Exp. 12.31 -0 Daniel J� ke� ��qT Civil- F Vice Pres9' ent FGF CA\, F DJO:ama Land Surveying cc: Bill Golden/Greystone Homes. Mike Steele/Greystone Homes/site fax 760 - 634 -7666 CAW1JD0WS1Tanporary Inua l FiIa\0LK10B1\RG Pad art -4.wpd Corporate Office: 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suite 20 14 San Diego. CA 92123 ♦ Phone(858)560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 120 ♦ Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 * Phone (909) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 ♦ Temecula. CA 92590 1 Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909) 693 -3320 O °RUG. 16. Z001i8: 5 :04Pt'9494,GREYSTONE HOMES FORSL SLyq4ERS MHY NO.516 P 6 82 CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMORANDUM Date: June 26, 2001 TO: Bill Holden, Greystone Homes VIA: Gary Lee, Engineering FROM: ✓Phil Cotton, Park & Beach Superintendent SUBJECT: Plan Review 1a check — Greystone /Bay Laurel "Leucadia Oaks Park (6775 OR) City staff (CD, CS, and Engineering has reviewed the subject plans for above referenced project. Community Development comments have been incorporated into Community Services comments and Engineering Comments are provided on check print. Community Service comments and observations are attached. Corresponding numbers have been placed on plans where applicable. cc: John Frenken, Park Supervisor File / Originator 633310 I- 1. I °IAUG.16.2001se 5 :04RI1494- GREYSTONE HOMES FORSUM SUMMERSMURPHY x;NGINEEIUING SERVICES DEPAit . MENT TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Cap(tal Improvement Projects (CIP) Q Subdiviiion Engin «ring (SE District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office ofthe Director (M I) O ATTENTION: Regarding (Finance Number 6 [5 _(=pOS1xejTR�) (Finaaee Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE l ransmined as following: Final Parcel Map 0 Final Map [] Check Checkpriot / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report Q Traverse Calculations (D Reference Maps ❑ Interoffice Memorandum- ❑ Plaacheck Comments* ❑ Legal Description Q Plat CJ Other: ❑ Easement re; Covenant rc: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements Sewer Park Impact Fees Drainage ❑ Assessments Agreemcnt re: n Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Mainz ❑ li Improvement Plan ❑ Cheek CheckprinVApproved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments- ❑ Grading Plan Check NO. 516 P.3 /6_ rNCt 03 9p, tpb� cophaj rrwro.enwn 013mcl SLVDW Aaw Ot SvbArlrlen Ena Frame Eve Traffic Enginsering (TE) Field Operations (Fo" C-31 TP P/MIN/DR 9c� APN: Other Applicadon: (Ty Pe) (Check) Comrnerts/Additional Space for Document • (StafVConraltao( Sketch (if needed): trarc) (A aJdWaur/SCweLtT iliry) Intermediate Description: t— %;J=proved ri Gopy /UMglhal/Rejected Pfancheck Comments' ❑ Plan Change Description � Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Sal Report [] (M ugh/Prtliminaq� Hydrology Study/Map-❑ Cross Secdons ❑ Exhlbit C) (E Sion Co. lant� As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review Out Inquiry For your... ortioa C] Symment/ signature I Information S Please return f BGtLC_ ✓ 4 case call: — � Originator: s Copies to: V Messtrtg I ' Received A Title: L 505 South Vuleao Avenue, E vitas, California )MARB/Generie Tner 9ua/02.1 one: Our Approval Uses TEL (76D) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -28[8 / TDD (760) 633,2700 1 or 1 `AUG. 16-20012d: 5:O4PM3494-GREYSTONE HOMES FURSUM SUMMERS"PHY NO. 516 LEUCADIA OAKS PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES FIRST PLAN REVIEW June 26, 2001 P. 4/6_ P-AUE 04 1. Sheet 3 is the title sheet, move to front placing grading plan and notes behind. Park name is "Leucadia Oaks Park ". 2. Remove unnecessary vicinity maps and key maps 3. Move grading notes to grading sheet 4. Move signature blocks to title page. S. Color of DG is to be Mojave Gold. 6. Mislabeled 7. Show only current play equip layout 8. Concrete mow curb to be used when DG path is adjacent to turf 9. Locate bike rack near play area 10. Add additional trash receptacles, one per active area 11. Remove "Future Restroom" and state what is being stub out, electrical, water, sewer? 12. Change basketball court notes to standard as indicated 13. Reduce play structure to one structure and have separate swings for tots and adults, and Hopscotch are per Council condition SCE #7 14. Concrete color for park site shall be Sombrero Buff. 15. Remove border when DG path meets other DG areas 16. Why is pipe being extended and capped? 17. Identify and provide detail 18. Add aluminum stair nose to steps 19. Use most current park layout for all sheets 20. Change areas to have 1 tot table and 1 regular table per area 21. Add DG access to picnic areas 22. Contractor to prepare agronomic soils report 23. Tree well in turf area to be 36" minimum 24. Two symbols used for DG 25. Show drainage inlets, drains, connection to storm drain and direction of flow 26. Change grade so water doe not sheet flow over tot area or other courts, divert water towards volleyball court area 27. Locate note to what it is identifying 28. Change Volleyball post and detail to ones attached 29. Show detailed subterranean drainage system and tic in to storm drain 30. Correct table ID per catalog Leu Oaks -1st Plan Check,doc 06/28/01 1 I 1 I 4 °:RUG. 16.2001�� 505Pf'd494'GREYSTONE HOMES FORSUM SUMMERSMURPHY No. 516 P. 05 31. Provide submittal 32. Bike rack to be green 33. Spell out or use Regional Standard drawings, remove "per Structural Engineer" 34. No detail, provide 35. Expand ADA surfacing behind swings, surfacing to only two swings 36. Compaction to 95% 37_ State sub -base material and depth 38. State type and size of steel top be used 39. Basketball court to be one color, Sombrero Buff, key lines to be painted in "White" in color 40. Remove note 41. Delete Bus Shelter 42. Score joints @ 10' o.c. Expansion joints @ 20' 43. Provide structural data for Trex material spanning this length 44. Fence to be hot dipped galvanized after fabrication 45. Add note under "Metal Work" for hot dipped galvanizing 46. Adjust heads to be a minimum of 5' from play area 47. Designate mainline different than lateral lines 48. Show water line to drinking fountain 49. Remove topo lines from irrigation and planting plans 50. Pads to be colored concrete 51. Redesign so turf can be watered without wetting benches 52. An isolation valve shall be installed prior to each valve, valve manifold or QC. 53. Remove unnecessary notes 54. Install valve boxes perpendicular to hardscape and no mote than 6" from hardscape 55. Note shall be consistent with what is called out in legend 56. Change "leakage" to drop in pressure 57. Remove unused details 58. Root barriers shall be installed along improvement, not encircling rootball, and shall be W13-24 by Deep Root. 59. Allen Studios shall design and install sign. 858 -481 -5888 60. Eliminate fence 61. Berm / landscaping does not appear to be consistent with concept approved by planning Commission and City Council. See attached detail presented to the Planning Commission and City Council. Leu Oaks -1st Plan Checkdoc 0628/01 2 4 A� Y i . M Taw- • " ma CD N 0 In 0 A P A W 70 m P < y{ r, Ln O Z f'1 I 0 3 U) N TAI Cm r t � 0 (n m ,a+ m m i ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City 1/ �� Capital Improvement Projects '! District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment /Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering April 19, 2001 Graystone Homes Inc. 5780 Fleet Street Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Case 98 -240 TM /CDP /EIR (46 SFD lot subdivision at the northeast corner of Vulcan Ave. and Sanford St.) Grading Application 6775GR [Precise Grading /Erosion Control] Improvement Application 677SIR [Public Road /Drain) A.P.N. 254. 052.12,13 254. 010.7,24 254. 102.51 Permit issuance requirements This correspondence shall serve to briefly summarize the Engineering Permit process. Drawings 6775 -G and 6775 -1, and the corresponding checkprints and draft documents, have been returned to the Engineer of Work, subject to corrections. Upon resubmittal, the revised plans are subject to approval by the Director of Engineering Services and will remain valid for three years. In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per these Drawings, you will need to satisfy the following requirements: (1) Obtain all plan approvals. Then provide 4 blueline copies of each approved Drawing. (2) Post Security Deposits as follows: WGRADING PERMIT... in the amount of $610.367.00 to guarantee performance of earthwork, site retaining walls, private drainage improvements, and erosion control, WIMPROVEMENT PERMIT... in the amount of $381.004.00 to guarantee performance of public road and drainage improvements, and Up to 80% of the amount in 2(a) and 100% of the amounts in 21b) may be in the form of a Performance Bond, and, in the case of deferred monuments, a Labor and Materials Bond, issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Twenty percent of the amount in 2(a) has to be in the form of cash, certificates of deposit, a letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Any financial instrument's format is subject to approval. (3) Pay an additional Plan Check Fee of $205.70. (4) Pay non - refundable Inspection Fees and an Inspection Deposit, the latter subject to cost recovery, respectively, as follows: fa)GRADING PERMIT... of $20,311.00, NIMPROVEMENT PERMIT... of $13,430.00, and (5) Provide the name, address, telephone number, and state license number of the construction contractor. Construction and repair of public improvements and installation of the sewer lateral are restricted to qualified contractors. Depending on the work to be done, the contractor will need to possess as follows either a valid: Bfrcaseno.98- 2401,grastone.doc I �. TEL 760 -633- 26(H)! FAX '60-633-2(,2- S05 S. \ ulcan Arcnuv. Inanitas. CuliGrcnia'4024 -3633 l7H) -604613 -` -f Mt �,�� recyded paper (a) Type "A" General Engineering, any work, (b) Type "C -8" Concrete, apron, curb, gutter, and sidewalk, (c) Type "C -12" Grading & Paving, any surface improvement, Id) Type "C -32" Parking & Highway Improvement, signage and striping, or (e) Type "C -34" Pipeline, any sanitary sewer and storm drainage, state license, and meet the minimum insurance requirements as stated on the accompanying handout. (6) Provide a work schedule. (7) Sign the Permits and Right -of -way Standard Conditions. Any authorized representative of the property owner may sign. Permits are valid for no more than one year and may expire earlier due to expirations on letters of credit and /or insurance policies. Once the Engineering Permits are issued, advance notice of 48 hours must be given prior to you or your contractor scheduling the mandatory pre - construction conference. See Grading Note #9 and Improvement Note # 15. Informal phasing of the project may necessitate more than one such conference. Trench repair for public water improvements and installation of the sewer lateral is allowed per the Improvement Permit, provided the contractor remains the same. The pipe and pipe zone are the jurisdiction of the San Dieguito Water District, by separate arrangement, and Encinitas Sanitary Division, per the Sewer Construction Permit. Please make the appropriate contact. A separate Right -of -way Construction Permit will be required for any work in the public right - of -way of Encinitas Boulevard that is not shown on the approved Drawings. Typically, this work may include excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install electric, gas, telephone, and cable television services. A Permit Fee of $250.00 per application and a site plan, preferably that drawn by the public utility, will be required. The contractor license and insurance requirements will remain unchanged. Permits must be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the start of work. Haul Routes, the Traffic Engineering Division handles Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits. An acceptable Traffic Control Plan will be required prior to the start of any work within the Encinitas Boulevard right -of -way. A typical plan shows all delineation, tapering, advance signage, temporary striping, barricades, flagman positions, and provides a schedule of operations. Contact Raymond Guarnes, Engineering Technician, at (760) 633 -2704. Construction changes, prepared by the Engineer of Work, should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposit. Prior to issuance of any Building Permit, a rough grading approval will be needed from the assigned Engineering Inspector. At a minimum, rough grading is defined as certified pad preparation and soil compaction, substantial completion of improvements, and safe access. As- builts of Drawing 6775 -G and Drawing 6775 -1, prepared by the Engineer of Work and approved by the Engineering Services Department, will be required prior to Final Inspection of the Grading Permit and Acceptance Inspection of the Improvement Permit. B frcaseno.98- 2401,grastone.doc2 Satisfactory completion of Final Inspections is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposits assigned to both the Grading Permit and the Sewer Construction Permit. Please note that Building Permit final inspections are a separate event apart from any Engineering Permit final inspection and are not necessarily coincidental. Satisfactory conclusion of Acceptance Inspection and formal acceptance by the City Council is a prerequisite to a reduction in the Security Deposit guaranteeing performance of public road and drainage improvements and start of the mandatory one -year Warranty Period. The retention will be held for the duration of the Warranty Period and will be released only after the satisfactory completion of a Warranty Inspection. The Warranty Inspection cannot be scheduled until after the expiration of the Warranty Period. This letter is limited in scope. During the Building Permit process, you will need services and be subject to regulation from as follows: the Current Planning Division, Building Inspection Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, San Dieguito Water District, and Encinitas Sanitary Division, all of the City, and the Encinitas Union School District and San Dieguito Union High School District, all separate public agencies. Please inquire at their respective counters. Additional engineering requirements will be forthcoming during the Building Permit process, including, but not necessarily limited to, coordination of the building site plan with the grading plan, resolution of any outstanding public improvement issues, and assessment and collection of flood control, sanitary sewer, and traffic mitigation fees. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2783, or you may wish to visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center. Sincerely, Duane Thompson Associate Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering cc SHO, Inc., Engineer of Work Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Mel Chappell, Engineering Inspector Gary Lee, Engineering Technician permit/file enc Bfrcaseno.98- 2401,grastone. doc 3 ENGINEERING SER VICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations l 5ond Replenishment /Stormwoter Compliance l_ 1 r; „mil Subdivision Engineering rim Traffic Engineering Navembell,4;-2w Hugh -Fraxr EBiatt CHrc.S �sz.L_ A4tn44wrdon-EFljott �Yi TSjO h I C minn Rnnl Cnit �8Q �L� ST6ZE=` �` �= 3�U �ZZO mss, z4u p •. -srSG— -cam - g oa _ 1 vu Re: Case 99-270 MIN /DRN /CDP (New, -24W y, 5; F34sf�eMtarV hospital/urgent-care @ 414 Encinitas Bt} Grading Application ?.1, recise Grading /Erosion Controll Improvement Application 6f iR [Public Road /Drain] A.P.N. 258. 194-19 2-54- 2 -t2,%-5 2_t;"#, -pt -ui, ZA- 'ZS - 102-6- Permit issuance requirements This correspondence shall serve to briefly summarize the Engineering Permit process. Drawings 6470 -G and 6470 -1, and the corresponding checkprints and draft documents, have been returned to the Engineer of Work, subject to corrections. Upon resubmittal, the revised plans are subject to approval by the Director of Engineering Services and will remain valid for three years. In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per these Drawings, you will need to satisfy the following requirements: (1) Obtain all plan approvals. Then provide 4 blueline copies of each approved Drawing. (2) Post Security Deposits as follows WGRADING PERMIT... in the amount of to guarantee performance of earthwork, site retaining walls, private drainage improvements, and erosion control, NIMPROVEMENT PERMIT... in the amount of W.8Y8.D0 to guarantee performance of public road and drainage improvements, and 3$ I V' D04- (ciSE1NE&- CONSTRUCTtON PERMI ... oun o ee instaflation- of the-sewer lateral. Up to 80% of the amount in 2(a) and 100% of the amounts in 2(b) and --2tc) may be in the form of a Performance Bond, and, in the case of deferred monuments, a Labor and Materials Bond, issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Twenty percent of the amount in 2(a) has to be in the form of cash, certificates of deposit, a letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Any financial instrument's format is subject to approval. (3) Pay an additional Plan Check Fee of $975.00 for 1 sheet added to the Improvement Plan. (4) Pay non - refundable Inspection Fees and an Inspection Deposit, the latter subject to cost recovery, respectively, as follows: -_ l _ (a)GRADING PERMIT... of $3,380.00, AO SZOO + , 03 X rjt015(o-1 (b)IMPROVEMENT PERMIT... of4 4+- AGr-ar d 5M r�03 ri t - tai 000_ /j� I �jr 43� •DJ (�rGrnrco r•nuCTRlI(•TIr7N PERMIT f S'tnrl_na (5) Provide the name, address, telephone number, and state license number of the construction contractor. MM/to /jsg/f:case /1999/99- 270i.doc I SB W O TO SB &O, INC. ATTN: TRANSMITTAL CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA. 92024 -3633 FROM: Mike Butcher RE: BAY LAUREL - Recorded Docurrtertts " We are transmitting the following via mail. Land ❑ For Your Review /Approval Planning ❑ For Your Information Civil Engineering Land Surveying DATE: 5110101 JOB "NO: 57142.1$ Reviewed as Noted As Requested No of Copies No of Sheets Description Date 1 2 Sae -Onge Deed & Legal Description 1 2 Johnson Deed & Legal Description 1 2 Hardebeck Deed & Legal Description COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY: DATE: cc: Chris Earl - Greystone w /encl via mail MSB:km Corporate OMce: 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suite 201♦ San Diego, CA 92123 ♦ Phone (858j 560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 120 ♦ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917301 Phone (909) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 9484750 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 ♦ Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909) 693 -3320 Order No. MAY U 7 '1 Escrow . Loan No. QORDING REQUESTED TIE URIGIHAL OF THIS DOClRF11I By WAS RECORDED ON MAY 04, 2001 M W MA 0 2001-0282072 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: GEM J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER SAM DIEGO COUNTY RECOW'S OFFICE SULANA B. SAE -oNGE TIME: 10:45 AM 273 Hillcrest Drive Leucadla,CA 92024 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX 5..-0. boundary adjustment only — no co nside rat ion ... ............................... .....Computed on the consideration of value of property; OR .....Computed on the consideration of value less liens or encumbrances mmaining at time of sale. SAME AS ABOVE /y d'y "y�pa a. Signature of Deklarent or Agent determining Firm Name APN W SF�P4F?l 254- Io1 -24 GRANT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, mccipt of which is hereby acknowledged, GREYSTONE HOMES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION hereby GRANT(S) to Sulans B. Sao -Onge, a widow. the real property in the City of ENCINITAS County or SAN DIEGO ,State of California, described as SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. Dated j6p \ STATE OF CALI ORNIA Is$. COUNTY OF Q I On /�¢T Y i before me, t 1G 13DCU,ta- 2�i OV personally appeared r UtGkaf.,t L. I known tome aside solo be the persott(s� whose nam* t� subscribed to the within instroptent and acknowledged to me that "sWthey cucuted the same i cWtheir.authorized capacity(iW, and that b s signature(q,Lon the instrument the person(s}or the entity upon behalf of which the personN acted, executed the instnunent. WITNESS my hand ial seal. Signature ofTic GREYSTONE HOMES. INC. A DELA WARE C TION By: By: a• (This arm for official notarial seal) MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE 1002(1/94) EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION GREYSTONE TO SAE -ONGE THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 22 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF 524 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDED APRIL 6, 1888, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF HYGEIA AS VACATED AND CLOSED TO PUBLIC USE ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 4, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO, 12782, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY JUNE 23, 1983; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE AND THE CENTERLINE OF SAID HYGEIA AS VACATED AND CLOSED, THEREOF SOUTH 15 003'15" EAST 12.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 014'01" WEST 14.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64 048'33" WEST 22.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 014'01" WEST 109.39 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG SAID PROLONGATION NORTH 15 005'01" WEST 15.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 74 058'09" EAST 145.82 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. SO&0. INC 1 of 1 J N 5714705. Fe ary 21. 2001 0 Z7142LEGALS%TNANS- W-ONGE Order No. Escrow No. Loan No. RECORDING REQUESTED BY WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: RONALD E. J014NSON 900 S. Coast HWY 101 Encinitas, CA 92024 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: SAME AS ABOVE APN R R - Sq- iiiy"'dy, 254 -�Dt -z4 THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DEWff HAS REDM ON MAY 04, 2001 DOgAEHT HdA1BER 2001-0282073 GREGORY J. SKITH, COlA1TV KIWDER SAN DIEGO COIAR 'S OFFICE TIME: 10:45 AN SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX f.. -0- boundary adjustment only - no consideration .......... % i .................... .....Computed on the consideration of value of property; OR .. _.Computed on the consideration of value less liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale. Signature *.fDm1a`rant or Agent determining tax - Firm Name GRANT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, GREYSTONE HOMES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION hereby GRANT(S) to Ronald E. Johnson, a married man. the real property in the City of ENCINITAS County of SAN DIEGO SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. Dated pg(7t \ I Zsto H STATE OF CALIFORNIA )ss. COUNTY OF LCAfI 1Jr'e I On r'4� t 2S tiQ�� before me, lU�ilA lQ�� I.1D4raiut �tbliG personally appeared personally known to me (ar pro °ad lama e-'�• 1,.. +• ^f •r' f 7 erider,eu) to be the personfe.1whose nanreW subscribed to the within instru ent and acknowledged to me tha ttloy a cured the same in tst! rhhekauthorized capacit3(jo , and that b hi signature(skon the instrument the person(*) or the entity upon half of which the person cted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my han d official s Signature ,Slate of California, described as GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. A DELAWARE C RATION By: By: as � (This area for official notarial seal) MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE 1002(1/94) w0muu:1111M. 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION GREYSTONE TO JOHNSON THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 IN BLOCK 22 OF NORTH LEUCADIA, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF 524 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDED APRIL 6, 1888 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE THAT LAND DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO RONALD E. JOHNSON PER DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 16, 1999 AS F/P 1999 - 497169; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 15 005'01" EAST 15.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 °14'01" WEST 87.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85 008'38" WEST 11.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 001'01" WEST 48.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71 014'34" WEST 2.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID JOHNSON LAND; THENCE ALONG SAID PROLONGATION NORTH 14 045'59" WEST 9.54 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID JOHNSON LAND; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 74 058'09" EAST 149.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. INC Job No 57142 05, Fsbuay 21, 2001 , 1 of 1 0 Z7142LLEGALSITRANSJOH� NSON Order No. Escrow No. Loan No. RECORDING REQUESTED BY WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: THOMAS D.HARDEBECK MARY MARTHA HARDEBECK 1540 Surf Road Encinitas, CA 92024 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: SAME AS ABOVE APN s 251-102-51 N- AGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT WAS RECORDED ON MAY 04, 2001 DOCUMENT NUMBER 2001 - 0`182074 GFIGORY J. SMITH, COI►IIY RECORDER SM DIEGO COLHTY RECOW'S OFFICE TIME: 10:45 AM SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX S..-0. boundary adjustment only - no considerat ion ... ............................... .....Computed on the consideration of value of property; OR .....Computed on the consideration of value less liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale. Signatur of Declarant or Agent determining Furn Name :lN M1817011011E FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, GREYSTONE HOMES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION hereby GRANT(S) to Thomas D. Hardebeck and Mary Martha Hardebeck, husband and wife as community property. the real property in the City of ENCINITAS County of SAN DIEGO ,State of California, described as SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. Dated 41" l T -•S 1-Z0a L STATE OF CALIFORNIA )ss. COUNTY OF 1 an 1b. sfe ) On • . a • —before me, personally appeared : , personally known to me eaidwtca) to be the person(c.) whose nam arr subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me a (he s%c4t ey executed the same i t s tbs(th,* authorized capacity(ies), and that bj(hilharlditar signature(e).on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon l5chalf of which the person(a),acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand p q official seal/) GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. A DELAWARE C RP TION ey: By: a• NUNN e .uc (This area for official notarial seal) MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE 1002 (1194) EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION GREYSTONE TO HARDEBECK THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 11, BLOCK 22 AND THE EAST HALF OF HYGEIA AVENUE (VACATED) ALL OF NORTH LEUCADIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO 524, RECORDED APRIL 6,1888 IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAID COUNTY RECORDER, LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID HYGEIA AVENUE WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 15 003'15" WEST 14.18 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 76 009'14" EAST 19.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 57 058'54" EAST 64.33 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13529 RECORDED OCTOBER 26, 1984 IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAID COUNTY RECORDED. THIS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT. SB&O. INC 1 OC 1 Ba LVN Jo0 No 5]14205. Noya w29 2000 1 L DW102LEGLLS%TR S- WDEBECK SENT BY: GEOSOILS, INC.; 7609310915; MAY -9 -01 7:53; PAGE 1 �eor SSO&M#AArm%mk � ls,,�n l . Geotechnical •Geologic - Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 - (780)438-3155 • FAX(780)931 -0915 DATE: 5 W.O.: TO: (_It's rl� hGI�I�AC ATTN: J (i(Ll.✓1(� • KJ 1-� SJh FAX NO.: FROM: SUBJECT: X33 I Z.O� -7- 2,01 Lzi.J NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: r (� ,Q I ri �& nT slwordpa- 11QwN%Arn,hm S -t -t- SENT BY: GEOSOILS, INC.; 'J 1 y r � 7609310915; MAY -8 -01 7:53; PAGE 2/3 f .c3 �1 Geotechnical • Geologic • Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, Califomis 92008 • (760N438 -3155 • FAX(760)931 -0915 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 7, 2001 W.O. 2391 -A -SC TO: Greystone Homes, attn: Mr. Chris Earl FROM: Robert Crisman SUBJECT: Fill Slope Construction at Lot 35, Bay Laurel, Encinitas, Ca. In accordance with your request, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI) has reviewed the site grading plan with respect to the construction of a fill slope on the west side of Lot 35. The attached figure 1 shows a schematic cross section, depicting planned earthwork adjacent to the project boundary in this area. It is our opinion that offsite grading in this area is not necessary. Should you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact this office. Respectfully Submitted, / \6tEAE0 Opa 465 f3 fo GeoSoils, Inc. 441e, �' Attachment: Figure 1 - Slope Detail Distribution. Addressee The City of Encinitas, attn: Mr. Duane Thompson SENT BY: GEOSOILS, INC.; 7609310915; MAY -8-01 7:53; PAGE 3/3 04/16/01 15:47 $858 560 8157 SB &a SB &O, INC. Planning Design Consultation SB &O Q 001/007 FAX TRANSMITTAL Please deliver to the person listed below as soon as possible. Thank you. d vAN� �or�i°,fw✓ TO: cc : Grfiur ��u FROM: Daniel J. O'Rourke DATE: 4 /6 _p/ RE: L/ ca-rL FAXNO: 7Go -6�� ZFs /8 7 &0- p04 -7716 JOB NO: NO. Of PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: COMMENTS: ES �� !S A Coi'YD� }'av!'L BaNd n� //'' rAr� GEl'J j 1� -F/ Titer Purr �n77t7 �W€ Btu Ce*a e4pl r4 sz� li.✓ Sl -1 GfG 7� /�%l�U ✓E/ilc� �C•�r�. Z 16,40F 71i/J lam/ c T1- Q_4/ (.ES7�rc T76E�`�^'� G✓nc� Ac- <✓�i� irt��f�' If there are problems in receiving this information, please call (909) 693- 3 f0. FOR SB &O IN-HOUSE USE ONLY: Operator: To be returned: To be filed: SB &O, INC. LAND PLANNING+CIVIL ENGINEERING+LAND SURVEYING 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 +Temecula, California *92590+(909) 693 - 3310 *Fax (909) 693 -3320 CONSTRUCTION BOND ESTIMATE PAGE IOF4 PROJECT NAME: BA Y LA UREL JOB NO: 57142.10 S B & O, INC. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 560 -1141 (858) 560 -6157 FAX NO. OF LOTS: 46 W.O.: EST. BY. RLF/MC DATE: 04 /11/01 CKD. BY. DJO DATE: 04/11/01 BAY LAUREL TM: DWG. NO.: 6775-IR, 6775 -GR RESOLUTIONNO. SUMMARY This is a cost estimate based upon City of San Diego unit prices as of SEPTEMBER 1990; the amounts shown are furnished for the purpose of establishing bond amounts ont and ma not reflect the true cost of the work. The engineer is not responsibie for fluctuations in the cost of labor, material or components. A BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF WILL SATISFY THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 2, CHAPTER X OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE v 0FE sb IMPROVEMENT OF: j O,gok� t 9 sc No. 47677 m m A Etp. I .T - 31 .03 n CM1. E AU ESTIMATED TIME OF COMPLETION IS DATE FOR CONTROL ENGINEER APPROVED: R.C.E. NO. DATE SUMMARY. SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $346,367 WATER $208,536 SEWER $231,541 GRADING $610,367 SOFT COSTS 0 TOTAL COST $1,396,811 LAND DEVELOPMENT BOND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BOND TOTAL BOND 0: t67147,%pwWCbq Wme& w 2 If AW -01 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PROJECT NAME: BAY LAUREL JOB NO: 57142.10 S B & O, INC. 3616 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 660 -1141 (868) 660 -8157 FAX NO. OF LOTS: 46 O.: EST. BY RLFIMC DATE: 04111/01 CKD. 8Y: DJO DATE: 04111/01 BAY LAUREL WATER DWG. NO.: 6775 -IR ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT BOND PRICE BOND AMOUNT SH 3 I SH41 SH 5 SH61 SH71 SH 8 I I 1 8- WATER MAIN -21 15 383 640 320 1,358 LF $52.00 $70,616 2 1 -WATER SERVICES W -2 14 23 9 46 EA $630.00 $28,980 8" WATER VALVE 1 2 5 8 EA $1,700.00 $13,600 8 "FIRE HYDRANTASSEMBLY 1 2 3 EA $3,650.00 $11,550 5 IS TEEL CASING 160 1601 LF $100.00 $16,000 6 2- BLOW-OFF ASS Y. P -4 2 1 3 EA $865.00 $2,595 7 2 "M.A.R. ASSY. {P -10 ) 2 3 5 EA $550.00 $2,750 8 12 "WATER VALVE 2 2 EA $3,500.00 $7,000 9 2" WATER SERVICE 1 1 EA $1,150.00 $1,150 10 4" WATER MAIN 254 152 406 LF 28.00 $11,368 11 REMOVE EXISTING FH 1 1 EA $2,000.00 $2,000 12 REMOVE EXISTINGWM 3 3 EA $250.00 $750 13 CONNECT WM TO PROP. WL 6 6 EA $250.00 $1,500 14 12 "WA TER MAIN 313 313 LF $63.00 $19,719 4. � q � e o x z m a INA SUBTOTAL $189,578 10 %CONT. $18,958 TOTAL $208,536 on m 0 %71I7WeooliSCoif EIe P, w ff b4f S71e21 m 0 0 0 w 0 0 J ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PR E: BAY LAUREL JOB NO., 57142.10 SB &O, INC. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (8581 5604141 (868) 560 -8157 FAX O EST. BY: RLFMC DATE. 00 1/01 KD. BY: DJO DATE. 0411 BAY LAUREL IMPROVEMENTS DWG. NO. 6775 -IR ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT BOND PRICE BOND AMOUNT SH 4 5 H 6 H 7 SH 8 SH 9 SH 1 S 11 A.C. PAVING 6 BASE 0 - 13,296 29079 9078 51,453 SF $2.65 $f36,350 2 .PAVING 6 BASE (V 6 S) b24,151 f 0, B87 35, 038 SF 52.65 92,851 3 SIDEWALK G -7 4,613 2,050 ✓8,365 SF $3.25 $2714 PED RAMPS G -27 2 � 5 EA 51,050.00 550 5 ROILED G4 CUR TIER }299 568 644 ✓3995 LF d 3.75 54? +5 6" TYPE "G "CURB G -2 411 LF $13.75 7 CROSS GUTTERS G -1 1,462 154 1 434 ✓ zoso Sr $5.00 $iG'..:? -.. 8 18'RCP STORM DRAIN 57 }67 10 127 8 370 LF $84.00 $31,04y 9 24"R TPTORMDRAIN 55 55 LF $95.00 $5,225 10 30'RCP TORM DRAIN 329 - 329 LF 110.00 $36,190 11 4" VCSTOR 242 242 LF $16.25 ,933 12 8" PVC STORM DPAiN 17 17 LF $37.00 $629 13 8'PVC STORM DRAIN 105 105 LF $37.00 14 12 "PVCS R DRAT 93 93 LF $37.00 $3,44 1 15 TYPE A-4' S.D. CLEA OUTS 0-9 1 1 1 3 EA $3,675.00 $11,025 18 TYPE'F'CA TCH BASIN D-7 f 1 EA $3,400.00 $3,400 17 PE A" 0-25 CURB } } EA $2,240.00 $2,240 i PE'H "INLET 1 1 EA $3,850.00 $3,850 19 TV -2 "INLET 2 2 EA $3,650.00 $7,700 20 WAL D�34 } } EA $3,970.00 3,970 21 CONTROL STRUCTURE } 1 EA $3,960.00 $3,980 22 TYPE'G- }'CATCHBASI 1 1 EA 3,700.00 $3,700 23 TRENCH RESURFACING 62 62 LF $23.00 $1,426 24 WCUT 50 50 F $3.00 $150 25 A.C. DEMOLITION 4630 4,630 SF $0.85 $3,96 A. RM 105 105 LF $8.20 Y MONUMENT M -f 0 17 f 7 EA $420.00 Y E?CT 3 A 4 "CL I7 BASE 1705 1,705 Sr $2.65 $4, 5 i tl ON .D.R.SD.O -73 2 2 EA $600.00 $1,200 ELTER } � O • f EA $5000.00 $5000 VCHAN L R -26 SIGN f 8 EA $200.00 ,80 L R -1 SIGN } y _ 1 EA 5200.00 A 31 oaf 7 1 SUBTOTAL 5346,367 110% CONT. $ 4, 637 TOTAL 381,004 a 14Jvk NI wE,MuN W2 A m 0 N Y m N N m u J rn m 0 1JJI � 0 y 0 0 J lla/Y -0f !1112" ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PROJECT •: . I • . SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 :1 (858) 560-8157 FAX T• • • II • EST. BY. RLFIMC DATE. 04111/01 ZWD 13-Y DJO DATE: 04111/01 --- SAY LAUREL GRADING DESCRIPTION o RETAINING WALL (MASONRY) mam /,' + l -r �f 1 r O J O O J OlSf flMlpcvf.ICM E.fim.h w9] )f -R of 57f41. .f . BY. .. .. . DAY LAUREL SEWER QUANTITIES -r �f 1 r O J O O J OlSf flMlpcvf.ICM E.fim.h w9] )f -R of 57f41. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PROJECT NAME: BAY LAUREL JOB NO: 57142.10 S B& O, INC. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 560 -1141 (858) 560 -8157 FAX N F L TS: 46 EST. BY: RLF DATE: 124)4M CKD. BY: DJO DATE: 1204/00 BAY LAUREL IMPROVEMENTS DWG. NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT BOND PRICE BOND AMOUNT SH 3 SH 4 SH 5 SH 6 SH 7 SH 8 SH 9 SH f 0 SH 11 1 A. C. PAVING & BASE (ON -SITE) 14,419 28688 9076 52,183 SF $1.75 $91,320 2 A. C. PAVING & BASE V & S 21,091 11,420 32,511 SF $1.75 $56,894 3 SIDEWALK G -7 1,802 4,513 2,050 8,365 SF $3.25 $27,186 4 PED RAMPS G -27 3 2 5 EA $950.00 $4,750 5 ROLLED G-4 CURB & GUTTER 1,233 1,488 643 3,365 LF $14.50 $48,789 6 6" TYPE 'G "CURB 1,010 1,010 LF $14.50 $14,649 7 CROSS GUTTERS G -12) 154 434 588 1 SF $6.25 $3,67 8 18 "RCP STORM DRAIN 57 167 10 127 56 418 LF $90.00 $37,60. 9 24 "RCP STORM DRAIN 348 348 LF $115.00 $40,042 10 6 "PVC STORM DRAIN 261 261 LF $12.00 $3.136 11 TYPE 'A- 4'S.D. CLEANOUTS(D -9) 1 1 2 EA $3,980.00 $7,960 12 TYPE 'F' CATCH BASIN D -7 1 1 EA $3,550.00 $3,550 13 TYPE "A" D -25) CURB OUTLET 1 1 EA $2,350.00 $2,350 14 TYPE "B "INLET 1 1 EA $3,850.00 $3.850 15 TYPE "B -2 "INLET 2 2 EA $3,850.00 $7,700 16 WINGWALL 2 2 EA $4,150.00 $8.300 17 CONTROL STRUCTURE 1 1 EA $3,980.00 $3,980 N z r N SUBTOTAL $274,41. 10%CONT $27,441 TOTAL 301,853 D 51,410 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PROJECT NAME: BAY LAUREL JOB 0 :. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 560-il4l (858) 560-8157 FAX N#. . DATE. EST BY RLF , -„ CKD.BY.DJO DATE: 12104100 &AY LAUREL GRADING DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES TOTAL B-OND7 AMOUNT� --QUANTITY p ��E•fE/��E#��E•��p �� p ��E•��ills��E•��p�� D0711$4/YO�WEsnm.ro. rot wDs ]>,t)10 • Geotechnical -Geologic* Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 " (760) 438 -3155 • FAX (760) 931 -0915 Greystone Homes 5780 Fleet Street, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Chris Earl W.0.2391 -A2 -SC Subject: Evaluation of Proposed Slope Along Eastern Site Boundary, Bay Laurel Project on Vulcan Avenue, City of Encinitas, San Diego County, California References: 1. "Site Plan, Bay Laurel " Sheet 1 of 2, dated May 31, 2000, by Pasco Engineering. 2. "Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, 11.8 Acre Encinitas Property Located at Northeast Intersection of Sanford Road and Vulcan Avenue, City of Encinitas, California." W.O. 2391 - A.1-SC, dated April 2, 1998, by GeoSoils, Inc. Dear Mr. Earl: In accordance with your request, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI) has evaluated the proposed slope along the eastern property boundary. Specifically, the subject slope is located along the rear of proposed Lot 1 and Lots 32 through 38. The purpose of our review was to evaluate the overall stability of the existing slope, and provide options on the future graded slope stability relative to the configuration exhibited on the above referenced plan. This evaluation is based upon information provided in the above referenced site plan and geotechnical report, our experience in the area, a recent site visit (including collection of a sample for shear strength evaluation), and upon a slope stability analysis. Brief Site Description The existing slope, on the order of 10± feet in height, is currently mantled with well established vegetation. Existing, single - family residences are located along the top of slope. Based upon our previous geotechnical study, terrace deposits are exposed in the slope. Topography exhibited on the referenced site plan (by Pasco Engineering) indicates that the slope descends at a 1:1 ± to 1.5:1 ± (horizontal to vertical) gradient towards the west. The site plan by Pasco Engineering (referenced above) proposes a 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) gradient fill slope descending from a drainage swale constructed along the site boundary. Planned elevations of lots along this area range from 3± feet to 10± feet lower than existing grades. A retaining wall, ranging in height from 3± feet to 8± feet, is planned along the toe -of- slope. It is our understanding that constructing the retaining wall at the toe of the existing slope, without grading the slope, may be considered as an option. Direct Shear Test Shear testing was performed on a undisturbed sample (B -2 @ 2'), in general accordance with ASTM Test Method D -3080. Test results are presented in the following table. LOCATION COHESION (PSF) INTERNAL FRICTION B -2 @ 2' 375 1 32° Slope Stability Due to the proposed changes (i.e., decrease) in elevation along the eastern property boundary, slope stability was calculated at two areas of the proposed slope. The northern section, through Lot 36, evaluated an 8± foot high retaining wall proposed below a 12± foot high 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) gradient fill slope (section A -A'). The existing slope is on the order of 12± feet in height. The southern section, through Lot 32, evaluated a 6± foot high retaining wall proposed below a 7± foot high 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) gradient fill slope (section B -B'). The existing slope is also on the order of 12± feet in height. In addition, slope stability was calculated for the same sections considering a retaining wall along the existing toe -of- slope. No slope grading was considered. Existing slope heights and proposed wall heights were similar to those provided above. Analyses were performed utilizing the two dimensional slope stability computer program "XSTABL." The program calculates the factor of safety for specified circles or searches for the circular, block, or irregular slip surface having the minimum factor of safety using the simplified Bishop Method, Janbu or general limit equilibrium (Spencer). Additional information regrading the methodology utilized in this program may be provided upon request. The cross sections considered the interpreted geologic structures indicated by our field investigation (GSI, 1998). The presence of adverse geologic structures should be further evaluated during rough grading so that mitigative measures can be provided, if warranted. Sampling of exposed_ materials to confirm anticipated soil parameters also should be performed during grading. tareysrone domes Bay Laurel Project F1e:e:lwp7\230012391 a2.eop GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 2391 -A2 -SC August 10, 2000 Page 2 Computer print -outs of calculations and shear strength parameters may be provided upon request. CONCLUSIONS While the existing slope is considered grossly stable, the exposed earth materials at the slope face are considered erosive and should be protected appropriately. Specific recommendations for slope protection are provided in the above referenced geotechnical report (GSI, 1998). Gross Stability Analysis Based on the available data and our stability calculations, calculated factors -of- safety greater than 1.5 or 1.15 have been obtained for the proposed 2:1 gradient (horizontal/vertical) fill slope overlying the retaining wall (see referenced Site Plan), when analyzed from a static or pseudo - static (seismic) viewpoint, respectively. It appears that this proposed configuration of grading and construction is suitable for the planned development. When the option of a retaining wall constructed along the toe of the existing slope was evaluated (i.e., without slope grading), the calculated factors -of -safety is less that 1.5 (i.e., 1.4) for static conditions, but greater than 1.15 for pseudo- static (seismic) conditions. Based upon the proposed "cut' to achieve future pad grade(s), it appears that this proposed grading and construction is unsuitable for the planned development (i.e., factor - of -safety less than 1.5 for static conditions). Slope Considerations and Slope Design All slopes should be designed and constructed in accordance with the minimum requirements of the City of Encinitas, the recommendations the referenced geotechnical report. 1. Fill slopes should be designed and constructed at a 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) gradient or flatter, and should not exceed 20 feet in height. Fill slopes should be properly built and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent throughout, including the slope surfaces. Guidelines for slope construction are presented in the applicable geotechnical report (referenced above). Greystone Homes Bay Laurel Project Fi1e:e: \wp7\230012391 a2.eop GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 2391 -A2 -5G August 10, 2000 Page 3 2. Cut slopes should be designed at gradients of 2:1, and should not exceed 10 feet in height without additional slope stability analysis. While stabilization of such slopes is not anticipated, locally adverse geologic conditions (i.e., daylighted joints /fractures or severely weathered bedrock) may be encountered which may require remedial grading or laying back of the slope to an angle flatter than the adverse geologic condition. 3. Based upon the information collected as a part of the previous study, there are no graded slopes that appear to require buttressing, when constructed at a 2:1 (H:V) inclination. Local areas of highly weathered bedrock or non - cohesive sands, however, may be present. Should these materials be exposed in cut slopes, the potential for long term maintenance or possible slope failure exists. Evaluation of cut slopes during grading would be necessary in order to identify any areas of severely weathered rock or non - cohesive sands. Should any of these materials be exposed during construction, the soils engineer /geologist, would assess the magnitude and extent of the materials and their potential affect on long -term maintenance or possible slope failures. Recommendations would then be made at the time of the field inspection. 4. Cut slopes should be mapped by the project engineering geologist during grading to allow amendments to the recommendations provided should exposed conditions warrant alternation of the design or additional stabilization. INVESTIGATION LIMITATIONS Inasmuch as our study is based upon the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analysis, the conclusion and recommendations are professional opinions. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice, and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice, and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject to change with time. GSI assumes no responsibility or liability for work or testing performed by others, for our scope -of -work was expressly limited to the evaluation of the sediments /soils underlying the proposed residence. In addition, this report may be subject to review by the controlling authorities. Greystone Homes Bay Laurel Project File:e: \wpM300\2391 a2.eop GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 2391 -A2 -SC August 10, 2000 Page 4 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions pertaining to this report, please contact us at (760) 438 -3155. Respectfully submitted, GeoSoils, Inc. eU W. i m Fxp.c -( ��agortl9teQ<;• ,ac, Edward P. Lump Engineering Geologist, Reviewed by: t1 AZf3i.1/_ �rJ \ \ ?�_.'.a., John l'i'n `-'1.,�. � �� - ..t`•'�% Engineering Geologist, CEG 1 EPL/JPF/DWS /sw Distribution: (3) Addressee Greystone Homes Bay Laurel Project Re:e:\wp7\2300\2391 a2.eop Reviewed by: Geotechnical Engineer, GE 476 GeoSoils, Inc. W.O. 2391 -A2 -SC August 10, 2000 Page 5 CONSTRUCTION BOND ESTIMATE PAGE IOF4 PROJECT NAME: BAY LAUREL JOB NO: 57142.10 S B & O, INC. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 560 -1141 (858) 560 -8157 FAX NO. OF LOTS: 46 WO. EST. BY: RLF DATE: 12104100 CKD. BY: DJO DATE. 12104100 BAY LAUREL TM: DWG. NO. RESOLUTION NO. SUMMARY This is a cost estimate based upon City of San Diego unit prices as of SEPTEMBER 1990, the amounts shown are furnished for the purpose of establishing bond amounts only and may not reflect the true cost of the work. The engineer is not responsible for fluctuations in the cost of labor, material or components. A BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF WILL SATISFY THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 2, CHAPTER X OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF: Fy ✓ v. .,,y ✓ Fop " 20 �� ESTIMATED TIME OF COMPLETION IS 2'9% s DATE FOR CONTROL ENGINEER APPROVED: R.C.E. NO. DATE SUMMARY: SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS $323,890 WATER $185,454 SEWER $216,434 GRADING $610,367 SOFT COSTS FOFAL COST $1,336,14: LAND DEVELOPMENT BOND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BOND TOTAL BOND 0 V25/01 asf Esbmafe wog 25 01 57,42 70 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PROJECT NAM : BAY LAUREL JOB NO: 5714 .1 SB &O, INC. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 560 -1141 (858) 560 -8157 FAX NuTrTUT979 WO.: EST. BY. RLF DATE: 12/04/00 KD. BY, DJO DATE: 12/04/00 BAY LAUREL IMPROVEMENTS DWG. NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES QUANTITY TOTAL UNIT BOND PRICE BOND AMOUNT SH 3 SH 4 SH5 SH6 SH 7 SH 8 SH9 SHIO SHII 1 A. C. PAVING BA N- I E 14,419 28688 9076 52,183 SF $2.65 138,285 A. AVIN A E V & S 23,475 11,420 34,895 SF $2.65 $92,472 3 IDEWALK -7 1,802 4,513 2,050 8,365 SF $3.25 $27,186 4 P DRAMP - 7 3 2 5 EA $1,050.00 $5,250 5 6 7 8 9 ROLLED G-4 CURB & UTTER 6 "TYPE" URB CROSS GUTTERS G -12 18" RCP STORM DRAIN 24" R P STORM GRAIN 1,010 1,462 119 1,233 167 1,488 154 10 643 434 127 121 355 3,365 1,010 2,050 545 355 LF LF SF LF LF $13.75 13.75 $5.00 $84.00 $95.00 $46,265 13,89' $10,2. $45,74. $33,725 10 N 6'PVC STORM DRAIN TYPE'A- 4'S.D. LEANOUTS D -9 1 1 261 261 2 LF EA $16.25 $3,675.00 $4,247 $7,350 12 13 TYPE 'F' CATCH BASIN D -7 TYPE -A-(D- 5 CUR8 OUTLET 1 1 1 1 EA EA $3,400.00 $2,240.00 $3,400 $2,240 14 TYPE "B "INLET 1 1 EA $3,850.00 $3,850 15 TYPE'8 -2 "INLET 2 2 EA $3,850.00 $7,700 16 17 WINGWALL CONTROL STRUCTURE 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 EA EA $3,970.00 $3,980.001 1 $11,910 $3,980 18 TYPE'G- 1'CATCHBASIN 1 1 EA $3,700.00 $3,700 19 TRENCH RESURFACING 25 25 LF $23.00 $575 20 SAWCUT 50 50 LF $3.00 150 SUBTOTAL 323,85 10 %CONT $32,389 TOTAL 356,279 o u>i�ryy.o�r .r E. "2 a.r..or sr,.i 10 D W1411gp lLoaf Esft afe. wb2 BSJen -0t 5He1 10 PROJECT .: . , 01 INC. 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 560-1141 (858) 560-8157 FAX NO. . EST BY. RLF . • 12104100 CKD. BY. DJO DATE: 12104100 BAY LAUREL DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES QUANTITY TOTAL BOND AMOUNT SEWER CLEANOUTS SUBTOTAL $196,758 D W1411gp lLoaf Esft afe. wb2 BSJen -0t 5He1 10 D W 11Nl IC.V Elb.f. "2 3SJam0f 1111210 PROJECT O 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD, SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 (858) 560-1141 (858) 560-8157 FAX NO. . EST BY: RLF .• TE 12104100 CKD.BY. DJO DA TE. 12104100 BAY LAUREL GRADING DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES QUANTITY TOTAL BOND AMOUNT AREA DRAIN D W 11Nl IC.V Elb.f. "2 3SJam0f 1111210 DW14Zgy 1Co9Esnma(ewb2 1SJam01 5AJ? I0 PROJECT .: • 3615 KEARNY VILLA RD. SUITE 201 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 560-1141 (858) 560-8157 FAX .. . EST BY RLF . • ..., CKD. BY. DJO DATE: 12104100 :(858) BAY LAUREL WATER DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES QUANTITY - TOTAL BOND AMOUNT M Mm O WATER VALVE 6" FIA'E HYDRANT ASSEMBLY STEEL CASING 0 Mom, DW14Zgy 1Co9Esnma(ewb2 1SJam01 5AJ? I0 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Intra Trans. doc/02.11.99 1 of I T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (t! 1) ] Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: / /�/Xl�%� /T7iJ / /i�� DATE: Regarding (Finance Number -f �// DEPOS EE PL� [IP/Iv1I�i/DR: G (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE O (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ _ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ Blue Iine/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate Z 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TMITPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit EJ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Le ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ Easement re: Cove an re: • ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &Frr /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ /J� C/� Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Road/Drainage/Wa ter /Sewer /TraiVPark/Facility) Grading Plan ❑ SubmittaVPlan Change /As -built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc • ❑ Blue Iine/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittai9quirementsK Our Conver a on ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review U Approval � Signatuurreature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: G / (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Intra Trans. doc/02.11.99 1 of I S B &0 SB &O, INC. To: CITY OF ENCINITAS Attention: Duane Thompson TRANSMITT, From: Mike Butcher Date: February 26, 2003 Job No.: 57143.00 RE: BAY LAUREL EGEE WE D F E B 2 6 2003 ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS We are transmitting the following via hand delivery ❑ As Requested O For Your Review /Approval ❑ For Your Information ❑ Reviewed as Noted Number Of Copies Number Of Sheets Description Date 1 3 Certificate of Correction (original) 1 Check # for $13 2/26/03 COMMENTS: cc: Received By: Date: LAND PLANNING ■ CIVIL ENGINEERING ■ LAND SURVEYING Corporate Office: 3615 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 201 ■ San Diego, C.A. 92123 ■ Phone (858) 560 -1141 ■ Fax (858) 560 -8157 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 120 ■ Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 ■ Phone (909) 948 -3450 ■ Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 ■ Temecula, CA. 92590 ■ Phone (909) 693 -3310 ■ Fax (909) 693 -3320 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Michael S. Butcher, PLS 6922 Job No. 57143.00 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO SB &O, INC. 3615 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 201 San Diego, California 92123 ?00 ' O' �I G3�SSq -� CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION [PURSUANT CHAPTER 3, ARTICLE 7 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT OR SECTION 8770.5 OF THE BUSINESS PROFESSIONS CODE, OR ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO] NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT I HEREBY CERTIFY CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT 98 -240, BAY LAUREL, MAP NO. 14225, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY ON JUNE 11, 2001 AS FILE NO. 2001 - 0388319 IS IN ERROR, AND CORRECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 66469 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, OR ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO. THE 2 "X24" IRON PIPE TO BE SET AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 34 COULD NOT BE SET, AND INSTEAD A LEAD AND DISC STAMPED LS 6922 WAS SET IN THE TOP OF A PILASTER. THE 3/4 "x18" IRON PIPE TO BE SET AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 35 COULD NOT BE SET AND INSTEAD A 3/4 "x18" IRON PIPE WITH DISC LS 6922 WAS SET ALONG THE LOT LINE COMMON TO LOTS 34 AND 35, 1.50 FEET FROM SAID EASTERLY CORNER. THE 3/4 "x18" IRON PIPE TO BE SET AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 34 COULD NOT BE SET AND INSTEAD A LEAD AND DISC STAMPED LS 6922 WAS SET IN ALONG THE LOT LINE COMMON TO LOTS 34 AND 35, 1.25 FEET FROM SAID WESTERLY CORNER. THE 3/4 "08" IRON PIPE TO BE SET AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 33 COULD NOT BE SET AND INSTEAD A LEAD AND DISC STAMPED LS 6922 WAS SET IN ALONG THE LOT LINE COMMON TO LOTS 33 AND 34, 1.25 FEET FROM SAID WESTERLY CORNER. THE 3/4 "x18" IRON PIPES TO BE SET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 32 COMMON TO STAR JASMINE LANE (PRIVATE) COULD NOT BE SET AND INSTEAD A LEAD AND DISC STAMPED LS 6922 WAS SET AT AN OFFSET OF 1.25 FEET IN THE TOP OF CURB. THE OFFSET SHALL BE MEASURED RADIALLY OR PERPENDICULAR TO SAID WESTERLY LINE. THE 3/4 "X18" IRON PIPES TO BE SET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 36 -39 57143 M14225 CofC 1130103 INCLUSIVE, COULD NOT BE SET, AND INSTEAD A LEAD AND DISC STAMPED LS 6922 WAS SET IN THE TOP OF A PILASTER. THE 3/4 "08" IRON PIPE TO BE SET AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 41 COULD NOT BE SET AND INSTEAD A LEAD AND DISC STAMPED LS 6922 WAS SET IN THE TOP OF A PILASTER ON THE LOT LINE COMMON TO LOTS 40 AND 41, 1.00 FEET FROM SAID NORTHERLY CORNER. THE 3/4 "x18" IRON PIPE TO BESET AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 42 COULD NOT BE SET AND INSTEAD A LEAD AND DISC STAMPED LS 6922 WAS SET IN THE TOP OF A PILASTER ON THE LOT LINE COMMON TO LOTS 41 AND 42, 1.00 FEET FROM SAID NORTHERLY CORNER. THE 3/4 "x18" IRON PIPE TO BE SET AT THE REAR CORNER COMMON TO LOTS 42- 47 INCLUSIVE, COULD NOT BE SET AND INSTEAD A LEAD AND DISC STAMPED LS 6922 WAS SET IN THE TOP OF A PILASTER ON THE COMMON LOT LINE, 1.50 FEET FROM SAID REAR CORNER. THE 3/4 "x18" IRON PIPE TO BE SET AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 47 COULD NOT BE SET AND INSTEAD A LEAD AND DISC STAMPED LS 6922 WAS SET IN THE TOP OF A PILASTER. THE 3/4 "x18" IRON PIPE TO BE SET AT THE SOUTHERLY END OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 46 SHOWN AS N15 002'28 "W 85.06' COULD NOT BE SET AND INSTEAD A LEAD AND DISC STAMPED LS 6922 WAS SET IN THE TOP OF A PILASTER. THE LEAD AND DISC TO BE SET AT A 9.25' OFFSET ALONG THE EXTENSION OF THE LOT LINE COMMON TO LOTS 46 AND 48 COULD NOT BE SET AND INSTEAD A LEAD AND DISC STAMPED LS 6922 WAS SET ALONG THE EXTENSION OF THE COMMON LOT LINE 11.00 FEET FROM THE TRUE CORNER. 57143 M14225 CofC 1/30/03 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR I CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF ALL THE FEE OWNERS OF REAL PROPERTY REFLECTED ON THE DATE OF THE FILING OR RECORDING OF THE ORIGINAL RECORDED MAP. GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATION I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER THE DIRECTION AND THE CONTROL OF THE UNDERSIGNED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. MICHAEL S. BUTCIHUR, PLS 6922 DATE I, CITY ENGINEER IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION AND FIND THAT THE ONLY CHANGES SHOWN HEREON ARE CHANGES PROVIDED FOR BY SECTION 66469 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, OR ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO. LEROY BODAS CITY ENGINEER 57143 M14225 CofC 1130103 DATE city ooNGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT EncinitZ Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering September 15, 2003 Attn: The American Insurance Company 333 City Boulevard West Suite 1 100 Orange, California 92868 RE: Greystone Homes- Bay Laurel TM 98 -240 Vulcan Ave. and Sanford St. APN 254- 052 -12,13 254- 010 -7,24 254- 102 -51 Improvement Permit 6775 -I Partial release of security Permit 6775 -I authorized various improvements as shown on approved plan, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has performed the one -year warranty inspection and finaled the project. Therefore, a final release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 1114174 0222, in the remaining amount of $95,251.00, may be released in entirety. The original bond amount was for $381,004.00. The document original is attached. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra A. Geishart at (760) 633 -2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Since ely, Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Field Operations Cc Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Debra Geishart Greystone Homes Inc. File Financial Services TEL 760 -633 -2600 / FAX 760 -633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760633 -2700 (:� recycled paper TRANSMITTAL FORM JINEERING SERVICES DEPART. VT Capitol Improvement Projects Oistdct Support Services Field Operolims Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) Field Operations (FO) ❑ T 2vxav O 41, ATTENTION. DATE: / Regarding (Finance Number -�✓ _ �� DEPOS /FEE ' R: D 7 (Finance Number _� DEPOS /FEE " (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Comments/Additional Space for Document: Interoffice Memorandum* ❑ Plancheck Comments* ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ * ( Staff / Consultant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ S�ke,t�(ch (if needed): Agreement re: n Improvements C] Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ n� /f ( ` (Public/Private) 1 z 714 0(1e5 04 Improvement Pla Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments* ❑ (Road/Drainage/Water ewer rail/Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: - - -- - - -- ----- - - - - -- Grading Plan ❑ Check Plan Change Description: Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments* ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Hydrology Study/Map ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ffc Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Coluptio Comment Signature E] Information E] Uses El Please return %// / j Please call: if necessary Originator: Copies to: V Messenger ac imile ❑ Other ❑ I Received by: X— Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Genene_Trans.dm /02.11 99 1 of 1 city O0NGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Encinitas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering July 24, 2003 Attn: The American Insurance Company 333 City Boulevard West Suite 1100 Orange, California 92868 RE: Greystone Homes- Bay Laurel TM 98 -240 Vulcan Ave. and Sanford St. APN 254- 052 -12,13 254- 010 -7,24 254 - 102 -51 Improvement Permit 6775 -I Partial release of security Permit 6775 -I authorized various improvements as shown on approved plan, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the construction. Therefore, a reduction in the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 1114174 0222, in the amount of $381,004.00, may be reduced by 75% to $95,251.00. The document original will be kept until such time it is fully exonerated. The retention and a separate assignment guarantee completion of fmish grading. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra A. Geishart at (760) 633 -2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, � I M asi h Maher ALe ac h Senior Civil Engineer Finance Manager Field Operations Financial Services Cc Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Debra Geishart Greystone Homes Inc. File TEL 760 - 633.2600 I FAX 760633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinim, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 !� recycled paper - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT city Of Capital Improvement Projects EYLCZYIZtUS District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering July 24, 2003 Attn: The American Insurance Company 333 City Boulevard West Suite 1100 Orange, California 92868 RE: Greystone Homes- Bay Laurel TM 98 -240 Vulcan Ave. and Sanford Street APN 254- 052 -12,13 254- 010 -7,24 254- 102 -51 Grading Permit 6775 -G Final release of security Permit 6775 -G authorized earthwork, storm drainage, and erosion control, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the rough grading. Therefore, release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 1114174 0230, in the amount of $488,294.00, is hereby fully exonerated. The document original is enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, � Masi h Maher c� Senior Civil Engineer Cc: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Debra Geishart Greystone Homes Inc. file enc. 1 -�4w,4 J y Leach 4V Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 760 -633 -2600 1 FAX 760 -633- 2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas. CaUbmia 92024 -3633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 1# recycled paper c y o NGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT EncinZtas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering July 24, 2003 Attn: Bank of America N. A. Trade Operations Mail Code: CA9 03 -19 -09 333 S. Beaudry Avenue, 19`h Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 RE: Greystone Homes- Bay Laurel TM 98 -240 Vulcan Ave. and Sanford Street APN 254- 052 -12,13 254- 010 -7,24 254- 102 -51 Grading Permit 6775 -G Final release of security Permit 6775 -GI authorized earthwork, storm drainage, site retaining wall, and erosion control, all as necessary to build the described project. Therefore, a full release of the security deposited is merited. Letter of Credit 3037365, in the amount of $122,074.00, is hereby released in its entirety. The document original is enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sinc ly, - &� Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Field Operations CC: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Debra Geishart Mark Wolford File J Lembach Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 760 -633 -2600 1 FAX 760-633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinim, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760-633 -2700 0 recycled paper S113 No. of Sheets TRANSMITTAL &0 1 TO: City of Encinitas DATE: SB &O, INC. 505 South Vulcan Avenue 11 As- builts - original mylars Encinitas, CA 92024 JOB NO: ATTN: Debbi Geishart - Engineering FROM: Tony Pisculli RE: Bay Laurel - As- Builts We are transmitting the following via overnight mail. ❑ ❑ For Your Review /Approval Reviewed as Noted ❑ ❑ For Your Information As Requested 9� zoo 7/23/03 57142.91 No. of Copies No. of Sheets Description Date 1 11 As- builts - redlined prints 1 11 As- builts - original mylars COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY: DATE: cc: AMP /jgm LAND PLANNING +CIVIL ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 20 1 +Temecula, Califomia +92590 +(909) 693 - 3310 +Fax (909) 693 -3320 V97"M/ ` AIII- 7AYeJ IXUP 181417NW1 ,21'11p7M INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol knprovement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG /ARR/Intra_Trans doe /02.11.99 1 of I T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support rvices (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (N 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: DATE: 6�5 Regarding (Finance Number DEP IT/FEE P V/DR: (Finance Number _� DEPO EE (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ SubmittaVAmended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprim ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/FPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Chan pp lication ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report(Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/r /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Sketch (if needed) / gysription: Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ — CGCLt` Improvement Plan ❑ SubmittalfPlan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Est' (Public/Private) Note: See other blo ks for (tional items, if any. ( Road (Drainage / Water /Sew�/Tr:aWDPark/Facility) Grading SubmittaVPlan Ch s -built Proposed proved ❑ cc dzk2 Blueline/ nt Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submitt equirements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use A proval El Signature Information ❑ �❑ ORIGINATOR: G (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG /ARR/Intra_Trans doe /02.11.99 1 of I t SB TRANSMITTAL &0 TO: City of Encinitas SB &O, INC. 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 ATTN: Debbie - Engineering Dept. FROM: Tony Pisculli RE: Bay Laurel - As- Builts We are transmitting the following via overnight mail DATE: 7/8/03 JOB NO: 57142.50 ❑ For Your Review /Approval ❑ Reviewed as Noted ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested No of Copies No. of Sheets Description Date 1 21 As- Builts COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY DATE: cc: AMP /jgm LAND PLANNING +CIVIL ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 +Temecula, Califomia +92590 +(909) 693 -3310 +Fax (909) 693 -3320 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT city Capital Improvement Projects city Of llirlXS District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering July 2, 2003 Attn: St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company 385 Washington Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 RE: Greystone Homes- Bay Laurel TM 98 -240 Vulcan Ave. and Sanford Street APN 254 -052 -12,13 254 -010 -7,24 254 - 102 -51 Grading Permit 6775 -G (Park Site - Leucadia Oaks Park) Final release of security Permit 6775 -G authorized earthwork, storm drainage, and erosion control, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the grading and Parks Division has accepted the improvements. Therefore, release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond ST1506, in the amount of $490,971.05, is hereby fully exonerated. The document original is enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, - ) % " 7e ; Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Cc: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Debra Geishart Greystone Homes Inc. file enc. y Lembach Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 760. 633 -2600 I FAX 760 - 6332627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TDD 760-633 -2700 1� recycled paper Ej , uINEERING SER VICES DEPARTA.. NT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol anprovement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdvision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) Field Operations (FO) ❑ n ATTENTION: v G e��- DATE: Regarding (Finance Number DEPOS /FEE TP IN/DR: (Finance Number _) DEPOS (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comm ents/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Bluelme/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name ChaytgF7lpplication ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • ( CD/ CS/ FIREISDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &F/IYCATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) escription: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑_L� Agreement =e re: Improvements ❑ Pvt d aint. ❑ ❑ Improve e t Pla - SubmittaVPlan Ch - Co d Appro Mfg. Specs. ❑ C Propose e ❑ ed ❑ Blueline/Red- lined Checkprint /[ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage / Water /Sewer/T'raiVPark/Facility) Grading Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc' ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Pretiminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submitt 1 quuements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use ❑ App- rroval ❑ Signature ❑T Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600 /FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/intra_Trans.doc /02.11.99 1 oft SB No. of Sheets TRANSMITTAL OTO: 2 City of Encinitas DATE: As -built - Redlined copies 505 S. Vulcan Avenue SB &O, INC. Encinitas, CA 92024 JOB NO: ATTN: Debbie Geishart - Engineering Dept. FROM: Daniel J. O'Rourke RE: Bay Laurel - As -Built We are transmitting the following via overnight mail. ❑ ❑ Noted For Your Review /Approval Reviewed as ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested 5/27/03 57142.10 No. of Copies No. of Sheets Description Date 2 13 As -built - Redlined copies COMMENTS: Please call if you have any questions. RECEIVED BY: DATE: cc: DJO /jgm LAND PLANNING+CIVIL ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201+Temecula, Cal ifornia +92590 +(909) 693 - 3310 +Fax (909) 693 -3320 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Project! District Support service: Field Operation! Subdivision Engineednc Traffic Engineerinc T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (__D) ❑❑ Office of the Director (4 1) Field Operations (FO) El ' DATE: ATTENTION � Regarding (Finance Number D EPOS E P/M /DR: �j/%Z (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEEM_ (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ _ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo• ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ B I uel ine/Red- lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ CertificateZ 3) Street Vacation Application El Approved TITM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Penn Ml 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Tide Report [] Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other El Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property ApprOanre-: ❑ Utility Letter* ❑❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Le Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ Easement re: Cove Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ ' ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &F/T/CATV) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ �rs� Agreement re: ❑ ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd- Maint. ❑ Improvement Plao ❑ Subminal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Road/ Drainage[ Water /Sewer/Frail/Park/Facility) Grading Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc . ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade O Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submitta R9qun-cmentjjS7 Our Convey a on ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Us Approval Signature ❑ Information ❑ / ORIGINATOR: (Position) (Name) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 loft ISG /ARRAntra Pions doc /02.11.99 SB September 12 2002 &0 � , Job No. 57143.00 CITY OF ENCINITAS SB &O, INC. Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 RE: City of Encinitas Tract 98 -240, Bay Laurel Engineer's Building Pad Drainage Certification for TM No. 98 -240 & Grading Permit No. 6775 -G Land Pursuant to Section 23.24.310(B)6 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby Planning submitted as certification that the construction of the earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan for Lot 33. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, �QppOFESs�p� y P`�� 3. o 9� SB &O, INC. G �� ^ / a° No.- 31 m Civil / /�/ * ExA• 12.31 -D3 Engineering Daniel O'Rourke, PE �j9rF clv1� OQI; Vice President OF CALIF Land Surveving DJO;msb cc: Bill Golden/Greystone Homes. Mike Steele /Greystone Homes/site fax 760 - 634 -7666 C:IWINDOWMemporary Intemet Files10LK10BItDrainage Cert 33.doe Corporate Office: 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suite 201♦ San Diego, CA 92123 ♦ Phone (858) 560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 120 ♦ Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 ♦ Phone (909) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 ♦ Temecula, CA 92590 ♦ Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909) 693 -3320 SB &0 SB &O, INC. September 10, 2002 Job No. 57143.00 CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 RE: City of Encinitas Tract 98 -240, Bay Laurel Engineer's Building Pad Drainage Certification for TM No. 98 -240 & Grading Permit No. 6775 -G Land Pursuant to Section 23.24.310(B)6 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby Planning submitted as certification that the construction of the earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan for Lots 22, 29 and 30. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, h�Q�o �Fa Fo SB &O, INC. .�(�IK o No. 47677 �^ Civil ni * Exp. 12 - 31 - p3 Engineering Dame J Rourke, PE 9rF CI pP`'\ Vice President t OF CA S \F Lund Surveying DJO;msb cc: Bill Golden/Greystone Homes. Mike Steele /Greystone Homes /site fax 760 - 634 -7666 CAWINDOWS \Temporary Imemet Files \01,K101110rainage Cert 22 29 30.doc Corporate Office: 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suite 201♦ San Diego. CA 92123 ♦ Phone(859)560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 9007 Arrow Route. Suite 120 ♦ Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 ♦ Phone (909) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 ♦ Temecula. CA 92590 ♦ Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909) 693 -3320 BOND NO. 11141740222 PREMIUM: $1,334.00 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (Subdivision) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, Greystone Homes, Inc., as Principal, and The American Insurance Company as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Three Hundred Eighty One Thousand Four and no /100 Dollars ($381,004.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE FOREGOING OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, Whereas, said Principal has entered into an Agreement with said Obligee for Bay Laurel, Tract 98 -240 in which said Principal agrees to construct improvements as follows: Miscellaneous Improvements and, as a condition of approving said Subdivision, the Principal is required to give a bond to guarantee completion of said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly do and perform all the covenants and obligations of said agreement on its part to be done and performed at the time and in the manner specified therein, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. Signed and sealed on April 25, 2001. Subperf GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. a Delaware corporation By: THE AMER AN INSURANCE COMPANY By Qf < A'% i Patricia Brebner, Attorney -in -Fact CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGENIENI State of California County of Orange On April 27, 2001 before me, S. McDonald. Notary Public, personally appeared David Evans, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. S. Mc�C,.n.Lo Commission b 12,C9>3 Notcry Public - co;ifamla mange co niy - My Comm.'rgims Ap 16, 21b! OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: Corporate Officer — Vice President Greystone Homes Inc DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Type of Document: Faithful Performance Bond No. 111 4174 0222 Number of Pages: One (1) Date of Document: April 25 2001 Signers (other than those named above): Patricia Brebner CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE A' OWLEDGMENT No 5907 State of California County Of Orange On April 25, 2001 before me, Jeri Apodaca, Notary Public DATE NAME. TITLE OF OFFICER " E.G., "JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC" personally appeared Patricia Brebner NAME(S) OF SIGNERS) ® personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) B LIMITED GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) S"40671GEEF 2/9B DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE P O Box 71 91309 -7184 FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURELY CORPORATION OCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION TBE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation, THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation redomesticated in Nebraska, ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION, a California corporation, and AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, (herein collectively called "the Companies' does each hereby appoint Patricia Brebner bf Costa .Mesa, CA their true and lawful Artomey(s)-in -Fact, with full power of authority hereby confcred in their name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other written obligations in the nature thereof------ - - - - -- and to bind the Companies thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the corporate seals of the Companies and duly attested by the Companies' Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Atterney(s }in -Fact may do in the premises. This power of attorney is granted under and by the authority of Artcic VII of the By -laws of each of the Companies which provisions ere now in full force and effect This power of attorney is signed and sealed under the authority of the following Resolutop adopted by the Board of Directors of each of the Companies at a meeting duly called and held, or by written consent, on the 19th day of Much, 1995, and said Resolution has not been amended or repealed: 'RESOLVED, that the signature of any Vice-president, Assistant Secretary, and Resident Assistant Secretary of the Companies, and the seal of the Companies may be affixed or printed an any power of attorney, on any revocation of any power of attorney, or on any certificate relating thereto, by facsimile, and any power of attorney, any revocation of any power of attorney, or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Companies." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused these presents to be signed by their Vice- President, and their corporate seals to be hereunto affixed this 30 day of January 2001 co �.�u�,.r ♦`N�r'� �P "° N'� ? ✓" "y1 y "o F4ti _ '• FIREMANS FUND INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION THE AMERICANINSURANCE COMPANY ASSOCIATTd1NDEbVIIY CORPORATION AMERI UTOMOBRE INSURANCE COMPANY STATE OF CALIFORNIA l SS. By V I^�- ' COUNTY OF MARIN f Y On this 30 day of January 1 2001, before we personally came Donn R. Kolbeck to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he is a Vice - President of each company, described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seals of the said Companies; that the seals affixed to the said instrument are such company seals; that they were so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said companies and that he signed his name thereto by like order. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year herein first above written. KRISTIN k GAZZO 1 I 0 COMM. 01262236 NOTARY FVaUeULIFOM A Q MAIM/'OUNTY O Mr camp Fir• Apes M. ]ODI J N STATE OF CALIFORNIA i SS CERTIFICATE COUNTY OF MARIN f L the undersigned, Resident Assistant Secretary of each company, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore that Article VII of the By -laws of each tympany, and the Resolution of the Board of Directors; set forth in the Power of Attorney, are now in force. Signed and sealed at the County of Maria. Dated the 25th day of April 2001 Aesidrnt Assiruat �y BOND NO. 11141740230 PREMIUM: $1,709.00 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (Subdivision) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, Greystone Homes, Inc., as Principal, and The American Insurance Company as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Four Hundred Eighty Eight Thousand Two Hundred Ninety Four and no /100 Dollars ($488,294.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE FOREGOING OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, Whereas, said Principal has entered into an Agreement with said Obligee for Bay Laurel, Tract 98 -240 in which said Principal agrees to construct improvements as follows: Grading and, as a condition of approving said Subdivision, the Principal is required to give a bond to guarantee completion of said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly do and perform all the covenants and obligations of said agreement on its part to be done and performed at the time and in the manner specified therein, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. Signed and sealed on April 25, 2001. Subperf GREYSTONE HOMES, INC. a Delaware corporation By:� —� THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY By: /�. - - J (lJc Q = / Patricia Brebner, Attorney -in -Fact CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of California County of Orange On April 27, 2001 before me, S. McDonald, Notary Public, personally appeared David Evans, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. S. MC CornmWon s !2;_1;83 -s~ Notary ruetic - Co0om;a ' Orange County My Comm 67plres /gyp 16. Zt OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER Corporate Officer — Vice President SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: Grevstone Homes Inc DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Type of Document: Faithful Performance Bond No. 111 4174 0230 Number of Pages: One (1) Date of Document: April 25, 2001 Signers (other than those named above): Patricia Brebner CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE P ')WLEDGMENT State of California County of No 5907 On April 25, 2001 before me, Jeri Apodaca, Notary Public DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., 'JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC" personally appeared Patricia Brebner NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) ® personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their ` signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. �• L` : t CS:Z, Li SIGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) 8 LIMITED GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER. SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSONS) OR ENTITY(IES) S40671GEEF 2/98 O 1993 NATIONAL DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 7184 • Canoga FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPAY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION ACIATED 1NDEMNITY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, an IMaois corporation, THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation redomesticatcd in Nebraska, ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION, a California corporation, and AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, (herein collectively called "the Companies") does each hereby appoint Patricia Brebner bf Costa Mesa, CA their true and lawful Attorneys )-in -Fact, with full power of authority hereby conferred in their name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, nxognuances or other written obligations in the nature thereof- ----- - - - - -- and to bind the Companies thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the corporate seals of the Companies and duly attested by the Companies' Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Attmney(s}in -Fact may do in the premises. This power of attorney is granted under and by the authority of Article VII of the By -laws of each of the Companies which provisions are now in full force and effect- This power of attorney is signed and sealed ander the authority of the following Resolutiop adopted by the Board of Directors of each of the Companies at a meeting duly called and held, or by written consent, on the 19th day of March, 1995, and Laid Resolution her not been amended or repealed: "RESOLVED, that the signature of any Vice - President, Assistant Secretary, and Resident Assistant Secretary of the Companies, and the seal of the Companies may be affixed or printed on any power of attorney, on any revocation of any power of attorney, or on any certificate relating thereto, by facsimile, and any power of attorney, any revocation of any power of attorney, or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Companies." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused these presents to be signed by their Vicc-President, and their corporate seals to be hereunto affixed this 30 day of January 2001 FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY "°* � ; ••..,I, �`�, vt-` �F,s ` "_�' NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY aen.�,w '(J1�j'J�yYr ■iA L. �<< , :� �� •; i, r'� ,, X ASSOCIATED MDEN94TY CORPORATION AMERI UTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY STATE OF CALIFORNIA l SS. By 7,)ttC, ti ' COUNTY OF MARIN J V=4 rmiam On this 30 day of January , 2 001 , before me personally came Donn R. Kolbeck to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he is a Via - President of each company, described in and which executed the above instrument; that be knows the seals of the said Companies; that the seals affixed to the said instrument are such company seals; that they were so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said companies and that he signed his name thereto by like order. IN WITNESS VIHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year herein first above written. KRISTIN A GAZUZW D , wLtM.rlxuaa p d a NOTANY PIJaULG11Fa/Y1N Q WAMN COUNTY 0 LF, Ca E,mMr Apra a0. aOaJ J N STATE OF CALIFORNIA l SS CERTIFICATE COUNTY OF MARIN f L the undersigned, Resident Assistant Secretary of each company, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore that Article VII of the By -laws of each company, and the Resolution of the Board of Directors; set forth in the Power of Attorney, are now in fora. Signed and sealed at the County of Mann. Dated the 25th day of April 2001 I[n aa,o _ • rta�y1 t . )•aALl �`lt•aCA tiY Ii,.O� "�1� i "'�"LiiR•••faaRR iII�NNN 'r 3� _N tr ,Ti� ate•.: —•�•S p "her N+ " " +rn "iev� int��' Raideat AssisuntS BankofAmerica '-t j DATE: APRIL 26, 2001 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER: 3037365 BENEFICIARY APPLICANT CITY OF ENCINITAS LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA 505 S. VULCAN- AVENUE 24800 CHRISANTA ENCINITAS, CA 92024 -3633 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 AMOUNT USD 122,074.00 ONE HUNDRED TWENTY TWO THOUSAND SEVENTY FOUR AND 00 1100'S US DOLLARS EXPIRATION APRIL 26, 2002 AT OUR COUNTERS GENTLEPERSONS: WE HEREBY ESTABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 3037365 IN THE AMOUNT OF ONE HUNDRED TWENTY TWO THOUSAND SEVENTY FOUR AND 00 1100'S US DOLLARS ($122,074.00) IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "CITY ", ISSUED IN CONNECTION WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF GRADING APPLICATION 67756R ENTERED INTO BETWEEN CITY AND GREYSTONE HOMES, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "PRINCIPAL ", COVERING CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS OR WORK TO BE INSTALLED OR DONE IN OR FOR THAT CERTAIN SUBDIVISION KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS BAY LAUREL BY PRINCIPAL AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID GRADING PERMIT. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS AVAILABLE TO CITY AGAINST CITY'S DRAFT(S) DRAWN AT SIGHT ON US WHEN ACCOMPANIED BY: CITY WRITTEN STATEMENT (SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY MANAGER, OR CITY ATTORNEY) CERTIFYING THAT THERE HAS BEEN FAILURE OF THE PRINCIPAL TO FAITHFULLY PERFORM THE ABOVE AGREEMENT AND FURTHER THAT THE AMOUNT OF THE DRAFT ACCOMPANYING THIS STATEMENT IS NOW DUE AND PAYABLE. PARTIAL DRAWINGS ARE PERMITTED. ALL DRAFTS UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL BE MARKED "DRAWN UNDER IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER 3037365 ISSUED BY BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 333 SOUTH BEAUDRY AVENUE, 19" FLOOR, LOS ANGELES, CA 90017, MAIL CODE: CA9- 703- 19 -23. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT EXPIRES (1) ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE HEREOF AND SHALL BE DEEMED AUTOMATICALLY EXTENDED WITHOUT AMENDMENT FOR A (1) ONE -YEAR PERIOD LPON SUCH DATE AND UPON EACH ANNIVERSARY OF SUCH DATE, UNLESS AT LEAST SIXTY (60) DAYS PRIOR TO SUCH DATE OR EACH ANNIVERSARY OF SUCH DATE WE NOTIFY THE CITY CLERK IN WRITING BY REGISTERED MAIL OR BY OVERNIGHT COURIER THAT WE ELECT NOT TO SO EXTEND THIS LETTER OF CREDIT. UPON RECEIPT BY CITY OF SUCH NOTICE CITY MAY AUTOMATICALLY DRAW THE FULL AMOUNT REMAINING ON THIS LETTER OF CREDIT BY A CLEAN DRAFT, WITH NO SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS, AND BANK WILL PAY CITY UPON RECEIPT OF SUCH DRAFT. Wnk oLbn v.) lcnk ula,m.ie. Mail C"- CA" 11.19 -W JJS S. IRauJry iii, 19h Flr.x. Ln A,Vle.. L A%tH) g1J541:IQNS" I (CA919 ORIGINAL Ie L: Recycled Paper BankofAmerica 4 % PAGE: 2 THIS IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER: 3037365 WE EXPRESSLY AGREE WITH CITY THAT ALL DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL MEET WITH DUE HONOR UPON PRESENTATION. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS, 1993 REV., PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, ICC PUBLICATION 500 TO THE EXTENT IT IS NOT INCONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE LAW OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA. IF YOU REQUIRE ANY ASSISTANCE OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS TRANSACTION, PLEASE CALL 213 - 345 -6605. A"wj Z Q MANUEL BANUELOS SR. AUTHORIZED OFFICER ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES EUNSON BAE SR. AUTHORIZED OFFICER THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS 26Te DAY OF APRIL 2001 BY MANUEL BANUELOS — SR. AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND EUNSON BAE — SR. AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, WHO ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THAT HE /SHE EXECUTED THE SAME, AS ITS AUTHORIZED AGENT, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION /ASSOCIATION. NOTARt PUBLIC 11. L W A...6 N A. brA I I munnx Mail C4J.v l'A rtl -I4.W 1}1 S. Iko4Jn mm, 141h Flux. Lux Anuks. CA VWII MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: /C//G/03 CFSYL B. BUTIU cornffl 'bn 0 1239166 id } owccrnm.E� No1vy.pubuc'— Cdlfanla t Los AnCounty Ocf 1 6.2=3 ORIGINAL U 3341NMS "F14_('A419 '• t: Recycled Paper BONDNO. ST1506 PREMIUM: $1,227.00 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (Subdivision) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, Greystone Homes, Inc., as Principal, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of Encinitas, as Obligee, in the sum of Four Hundred Ninety Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy One and 05/100 Dollars ($490,971.05) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE FOREGOING OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, Whereas, said Principal has entered into an Agreement with said Obligee for Leucadia Oaks Park in which said Principal agrees to construct improvements as follows: Park Site Improvements per grading plan 6775 -G, pages 44 -62 and, as a condition of approving said Subdivision, the Principal is required to give a bond to guarantee completion of said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly do and perform all the covenants and obligations of said agreement on its part to be done and performed at the time and in the manner specified therein, then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. Signed and sealed on April 10, 2002. GREYSTONE HOMES, INC.. a Delaware corporation By: DavId Evans, Vic President ST. PAUL FI E AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY Patricia H. Brebner, Attomey -in -Fact Subperf CALIFORNIA ALL- PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of California County of Orange On April 11, 2002 before me, S. McDonald, Notary Public, personally appeared David Evans, personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. s- Mc DONALD J _s Commissioc Colif 983 a Notary Punic - California s Orange Count' r MyConvn.c0resApr142704 OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: Corporate Officer— Vice President Greystone Homes, Inc. DESCRIPTON OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Type of Document: Performance Bond No. ST1506 Number of Pages: One (1) Date of Document: April 10, 2002 Signers (other than those named above): Patricia H. Brebner CALIFORNIA ALL -PURF State of California County of Orange ACKNOWLEDGMENT No. 5907 On April 10, 2002 before me, Rhonda C. Abel, Notary Public DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G.,'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC" personally appeared Patricia H. Brebner NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) ® personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. r RHONDA 13 2777 � C n V CO ND # C. AB7 t' NOTARY Pn CAUrORNIALI SIGNATURE OF NOTARY ORANGECOUNTY n COMM. EXP. AUG. 9, 20P51" Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER ❑ PARTNER(S) LIMITED GENERAL ® ATTORNEY -IN -FACT ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE S40671GEEF 2198 O 1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 8236 Remmet Ave., P 0 Box 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91309 -7184 TheSMUJ Power of Attorney No. POWER OF ATTORNEY Seaboard Surety Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company St. Paul Memory Insurance Company United States Fidelily and Guaranty Company Fidelity and Guarantv Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. Certificate No. 9 0 6 9 i 1 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York, and that St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United Stales Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Iowa, and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters. Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein collectively called the "Companies "). and that the Companies do hereby make, constitute and appoint Jarnes A. Schaller, Rhonda C. Abel, Jane Kepner, Nanette Mariella- Myers, Mike Parizino, Linda Enright, Jeri Apodaca and Patricia H. Brebner Costa Mesa Can Sr' of the City of _ _ —State . their true and lawful Attomey(s) -in -Fact. each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above, to sign its name as surety to, and to execute. seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings. contracts and other written instrumems in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing the performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings requifed or`pgt} titled in tify actions or proceedings allowed by law, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused this instmmrt b Rnq{,;Wj!'}, '31St day of Idly 2001 1" qr r yy,, Seaboard Surety Company ` ,~ t•NIIlnited Stales Fidelity and Guaranty Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Cnmpalty �, ' Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company SL Paul Guardian Insurancb Company ; si Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. SL Paul Mercury Insurance Company Y_r W Y OMN 2 w 3,SEA sac.,, ' 1951 t 'f State of Maryland City of Baltimore THOMAS E. lIU1BREGTSE. Assistant Secretary On this 31st day of My 2001 , before me, the undersigned officer, persomilly appeared John F. Phinney and Thomas E. Hui"im, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary. respectively, of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.: and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the corporate seals of said Companies: and that they. as such, being authorized so to do. executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes [herein contained by signing the names of the corporations by themselves as duly authorized officers. In Witness Whereof, I hereunto set my hand and official sea]. My Commission expires the 13th day of July, 2002. 86203 Rev. 72000 Printed in U.S.A. REBECCA EASLEY- ONOKALA, Notary Public This Power of Attorney is granted under and by the authority of the following resolutions adopted by the Boards of Directors of Seaboard Surety Colhpany, St. Pau,' Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. on September 2, 1998, which resolutions are now in full force and effect, reading as follows: RESOLVED, that in connection with the fidelity and surety insurance business of the Company, all bonds, undertakings, contracts and other instruments relating to said business may be signed, executed, and acknowledged by persons or entities appointed as Attorneys) -in-Fact pursuant to a Power of Attorney issued in accordance with these resolutions. Said Power(s) of Attorney for and on behalf of the Company may and shall be executed in the time and on behalf of the Company, either by the Chairman, or the President, or any Vice President, or an Assistant Vice President, jointly with the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary, under their respective designations. The signature of such officers may be engraved, printed or lithographed. The signature of each of the foregoing officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Attomey(s) -in -Fact for purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and subject to any limitations set forth therein, any such Power of Attomey or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company, and any such power so exe- cuted and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is validly attached; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that Attorney(s)-in-Fact shall have the power and authority, and, in any case, subject to the terms and limitations of the Power of Attorney issued them, to execute and deliver on behalf of the Company and to attach the seal of the Company to any and all bonds and undertakings, and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such instrument executed by such Attomey(s) -in -Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by an Executive Officer and sealed and arrested to by the Secretary of the Company. 1, Thomas E. Huibmgtw. Assistant Secretary of Seaboard Surety Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Power of Attomey executed by said Companies, which is in full force and effect and has not been revoked. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, 1 hereunto set my hand this 10th day of April , 2002 9M, GO e'.� -i O a.p+ i ov Thomas E. Huibregtse. Axsistam Secretary To verify the authenticity of this Power of Attorney, call 1-800-421,.3886 and ask for the Power of Atiorney clerk. Please refer to the Power of Attorney number, the above -named individuals and the details of the bond to which the power is adackrd. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMr iff INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdvision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: f,A.A/ e DATE: Regarding (Finance Number r r - � DEPOSIT EE TP/jahAUP/MIN/D111:� ii, IF -,2110 (Finance Number - _� DEPOSIT 11 (Finance Number - _� DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ _ Submittal/Amended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TM/fPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: C. � Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: �3 Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ • ( CD/ CS /FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &Ur /CATV) Sketch (if needed) / Description: �'S 0 ;J ,400,400-71 �� D.N;AL- L��Y-i �/J Q � mj � Improvement Plan ❑ SubmittaVPlan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ ( ��arP) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) Grading Plan SubmittaVPlan Change /As -built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Ap oved cc' Blueline /Red•lined� Checkprint Original Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ C t Est ate ❑ So I Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Mass/Rough/Preliminaryi?recise) (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Requirements ❑ Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review ❑ Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: � �/ Z'�'V6;02" 7� � (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSUARR/Inua Trans doc /02.11.99 1 of I g�s,N HOROWITZ TAY. +' ENGINEERING'° 3914 Murphy Canyon " �3,�AO o • Suite A -100 San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 560.4383 FAX (858) 560 - 88942% j I✓ I v gq Wtsg K-( Ale! !✓+JII' r WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via L Shop drawings L Copy of letter ❑ Prints ❑ Change order ❑ Plans n LETTE" OF TRANSMITTAL r2- A VA it AF - =-/ N%AL" IpAoea gxy the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION BEN G N 1 T A S CA ctbz � WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via L Shop drawings L Copy of letter ❑ Prints ❑ Change order ❑ Plans n LETTE" OF TRANSMITTAL r2- A VA it AF - =-/ N%AL" IpAoea gxy the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION �s THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ 1� For your use ❑ PNAs requested ❑ ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE Approved as submitted Approved as noted Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED. &6 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. SB No. of Sheets TRANSMITTAL &0 TO. City of Encinitas DATE: SB &O, INC. 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 JOB NO: ATTN: Dwayne Thompson FROM: Tony Pisculli RE: Leucadia Park - Landscape Plans We are transmitting the following via hand delivery ❑ ❑ For Your Review /Approval Reviewed as Noted ❑ ❑ For Your Information As Requested 12 -18 -01 57142.50 No. of Copies No. of Sheets Description Date 2 sets Landscape Plans Ke]iItklanhll,l RECEIVED BY DATE: cc AMP /jgm 'O PLANNING +CIVIL ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING ^fferson Avenue, Suite 201+Temecula, Cali forn ia +92590 +(909) 693 - 3310 +Fax (909) 693 -3320 ,L JNEERING SERVICES DEPAR. 3NT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ❑ O District Support Services (D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #I) ❑ Capitol Improvement Projec District Support 5ervic, Feld Operatic, Subdvision Enstineerin Traffic Engineerin, Traffic Engineering (TE) Field Operations (FO) ATTENTIO[I: NL�rr Cr yam— DATE: OL,6 inl Regarding (Finance Number % 7S -�Z) DEPOSIT/FEE TPA /MIN/DR: ��- (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE , i -1 i� LsFtJilL�t " (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted at following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ Blueline[Red -tined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TMrFPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ I) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: f:7 t LC Traverse Calculations p Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Corporate/Pannership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter• ❑ Deferred Momamentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Additional Notes: Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ • ( CD/ CS /FIRFISDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &EMCATV) Sketch (if needed) / Description: (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) Improvement Plain ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. Grading Plan �SubmittaVPlan Change/As -built Proposed ❑ netted ❑ Approved ❑ cc ' ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ �� (Mass1Rough/Prelimioar0;;Z; Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Requirements ❑ Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review ❑ Us2 Approval ❑ Signature ❑ =Informnation ORIGINATOR: 6A<Z� (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024.3633 TEL (760) 633.2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 )SG /ARR/InUa mans. doc'o2 11 99 1 of l _ I s &O SB &O, INC. Land Planning Civil Engineenti, Land Surve. inn, TRANSMITTAL TO: CITY OF ENCINITAS DATE: 6/15/01 JOB NO: 57142.30 WO# 6775 -G ATTN: Duane Thompson FROM: Dan O'Rourke — -- - RE: BAY LAUREL - Precise Grading Plans JUN 15 2001 We are transmitting the following via hand delivery. ❑ For Your Review /Approval _ Reviewed as Noted ❑ For Your Information As Requested No of Copies I No of Sheets Description Date orig 3 6 6 6775 -G 38 -43 Bluelines COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY: DATE: cc: AV: km Corporate Office: 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suite 2014 San Diego. CA 92123 ♦ Phone (858) 560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 9007 Arrow Route. Suite 120 ♦ Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 ♦ Phone (909) 948 -3451) Fax (909) 948-2750 27715 Je6crson Avenue. Suite 201 1 Temecula. CA 92500 ♦ Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (9(19) 693 -3320 INEERING SERVICES DEPAR ;NT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvemenf Projects Dishict SVPPOrt Services Feld Operallons Subdivision Engineerng Traffic Engineering 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633.2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARRAnua irans.doc/02. 1199 1 of I T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services C--D) ❑ Office of the Director (#I) Field Operations (FO) ❑ � l 4 �P �l �// �`I DATE: O S byp ATTENTIOPI Regarding (Finance Number s C� DEPOS[ TPM/fM/MUP/M[N/D,R�:}9C� 2 O (Finance Number DEPOSI (Finance Number DEPOSITNEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal./Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo` ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TWTPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report(Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps p Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnersbip Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter• ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter O Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat O Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: 0( CD/ CS/ FIRFJSDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &FJI' /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ _Assessments Agreement re: Improvements ❑ Pvt..RRd. Maint. ❑ Improvement Plan 7 bm' lan Change/As -Built Proposed ED Co ect d ❑ Approve ❑ Mfg. S cs. ❑ Blueline Red - lined— Checkprin Original Cross Sections E] Structural Calculations ❑ Cost stimate ❑ iff t e) oa �g Note: See other blocks for additional items, any. ewe rail/Park/Facility) Grading Plan S tt�[an Change/As -built Proposed ❑///"""'Corte ted ❑ Approve ❑ cc • ❑ Blueline/Red- lined CheckprintN Original Hydraulic Calculations/Map [] Cost Estimate E] Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/ /Preliminary,4 � Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Cci troVP g & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal l cquirements �jcJ Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use ❑ Approval El Signature 0 Information ❑ 6 ORIGINATOR: r (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633.2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARRAnua irans.doc/02. 1199 1 of I sB TRANSMITTAL &0 TO City of Encinitas DATE: 4-4 -02 SB &O, INC.. 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 JOB NO: 57142.30 ATTN: Duane Thompson FROM: Daniel J. O'Rourke RE: Bay Laurel - Precise Grading Changes We are transmitting the following via Overnight Mail UFor Your Review /Approval ❑ Reviewed as Noted ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested No. of Copies No. of Sheets Description Date 1 3 Original Mylars - 6775G, Shts 1,41,43 3 3 Bluelines - Revised 1 3 Previous Redlines COMMENTS: Submitted for signature - Delta revision for set backs on Lots 40 and 45. Please call if you have any questions. RECEIVED B DATE: 40a, r cc: DJO /jgm LAND PLANNING *CIVIL ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 +Temecula, Cali forn ia+92590+(909) 693 -3310 +Fax (909) 693 -3320 SIB &o SB &O, INC. Land Planning Civil Engineering Land Surveving TRANSMITTAL TO: CITY OF ENCINITAS ATTN: Gary Lee FROM: Dan O'Rourke RE: BAY LAUREL - Grading and Imp We are transmitting the following via hand.e yjFor Your Review/Approval ❑ For Your Information DATE: 5/11/01 JOB NO: 57142.10 t R f t r 2001 11mill Reviewed as Noted ❑ As Requested No. of Copies No of Sheets Descri lion Date 1 Previous Redlines 1 SWPPP (Revised) + Previous Redline 1 12 Improvement Plan Mylars 3 12 Improvement Plan Bluelines 1 37 Grading Pla6 Mylars 3 37 Grading Plan, Bluelines COMMENTS: Original mylars submitted for signature and approved by Planning Department and Engineering Department. Please call if you have any questions. RECEIVED BY: DATE: cc: DJO:km Corporate Office: 3615 Kearny Villa Road Suite 201+ San Diego, CA 92123 + Phone (858) 560 -1141 Fax (858) 560 -8157 9007 Arrow Route, Suite 120 + Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 + Phone (909) 948 -3450 Fax (909) 948 -2750 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 4 Temecula, CA 92590 4 Phone (909) 693 -3310 Fax (909) 693 -3320 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT capital Improvement Projects CZ{n/ 0 District support Services J..,,,rF Feld Operations Encin&aS Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: FROM: RE: Name of Subdivision Engineering Public Service counter Field Operations Private contract Inspection Grading Permit No. Name of Developer_ Site Location �3 .(address.:: - ..number 90-20 ...Suffix, (lot) (bldg) I have - inspected the gradingmt the subject site and:havelmerifled ceanl icaticnI If the ad oil the Engineer of Work, dated compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated ".i:am hereby satisfied that the rough - grading has been comWetexl:lzt'accoPdaneeMriLtY the.approvetl, plans.,-and specifirarions, chapter 23:24-of the Municpal code; anld'arty- Ottier-2PPlicable engineering standards and specific project requirements." ' - Based -on my observation and the certifications, _I take no. exception to the Issuance of a- building permit for the lofts) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permitlsl and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that t can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. —5--P-2— (Date) (Signature of Senior Gvil Engineer, only if avoropiate) Dace) Reference: Building Permit No.6z/-2--Ira� Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in" boxes. please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork when completed Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. lIv �/I 1SGifieid3.doc1 Crecycled oaoer -rnn GAY 760 - 633.2627 505 S. Vui= Avenue, Enuniras. California 920243633 TOD 760. 633 -2700 ITT -\ti, Y mv4 y ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT capital Improvement Projects CZ{n/ 0 District support Services J..,,,rF Feld Operations Encin&aS Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: FROM: RE: Name of Subdivision Engineering Public Service counter Field Operations Private contract Inspection Grading Permit No. Name of Developer_ Site Location �3 .(address.:: - ..number 90-20 ...Suffix, (lot) (bldg) I have - inspected the gradingmt the subject site and:havelmerifled ceanl icaticnI If the ad oil the Engineer of Work, dated compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated ".i:am hereby satisfied that the rough - grading has been comWetexl:lzt'accoPdaneeMriLtY the.approvetl, plans.,-and specifirarions, chapter 23:24-of the Municpal code; anld'arty- Ottier-2PPlicable engineering standards and specific project requirements." ' - Based -on my observation and the certifications, _I take no. exception to the Issuance of a- building permit for the lofts) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permitlsl and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that t can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. —5--P-2— (Date) (Signature of Senior Gvil Engineer, only if avoropiate) Dace) Reference: Building Permit No.6z/-2--Ira� Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in" boxes. please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork when completed Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. lIv �/I 1SGifieid3.doc1 Crecycled oaoer -rnn GAY 760 - 633.2627 505 S. Vui= Avenue, Enuniras. California 920243633 TOD 760. 633 -2700 ��. X V1 ' " EiyGINEERING SER VICES DEPARTMENT capital Improvement Projects c City Of District support Services J .1 Feld Operations Encinitas Subdivision Engineering /t Traffic Engineering II ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection Q g -9-40 RE: Grading Permit No. Name of Project Name of Developer Site Location S 1 '! SU£fiXl OOU bfdgl ri f ._Mreecname -- iaddress; .: _.. umoe I have inspected the grading ,'at thesubjectsite and: have` Wlfled ce nd�tlonl f the pact soil the Engineer of Work, tlated _. compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated = I.-am hereby satlsfied':that the rough grading has been completed: ic;:= accortlan €e:wjttr She approved' plans -and specifications, Chapter 23124-of t a he Municipal Code, n'd( ww pater applicable - engineering standards andspecific project requiremerit3. Based -on my observation and the certifications,. &take no. exception to the Issuance of a -- building permit for the locos) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permitts) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only it appropiate) Reference: Building Permit No. 1 —Z5—�6-3 --- -- d'9— (Date) (Gate/ Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by plating a copy of l in both engineering technicians in-boxes. Please r ember to do a final inspection pf the grading Pamir and sancoordination with when completed- Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, Building Inspection. Thank you. JSGlfield1doc1 i ',AX 760 433.26 27 505 S. Vuion Avenue. Encinitas, C- ali[pmia 920243633 TDD 760 -633- =700 recycled paper ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT capital Improvement Projects City Of District Support Services EnClYbitas Field Operations cm= Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: subdivision Engineering Public service Counter FROM Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. s Name of Project Name of Developer n �' Site Location '3 ` .!address ...number ..street me ...suffix? (lot) (bidg) 1 have inspected the gradingrat the subject site and haveveiified'certifiCation of the pad by We Engineer of work, dated and certification of soil compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated — 1:9m hereby satisfied that the rough grading has been completed. in, accordance.v. Aw= 3Zle:at) proved plans and specifications, Chapter 23:24 of the •Municipal Code, and':any otlmtrapplicable engineering standards and specific project requirements. ' Based on my observation and the certifications, l take no exception to the issuance of a- building permit for the lotis) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permitts) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that t can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (oate) (Signature of Senior Gvil Engineer, only if appropiate) (Date) Reference: Building Permit No./ 15-36 Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you JSG /ffeld3.docl TEL 760.633 -2600 1 FAX 760 - 633.2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinim, California 92024 -3633 TDD 7GO -633 -2700 recycled caper tea. S v ErVGINEERLrVG SERVICES DEP.4RTYIENT Capital Imorovement Projects Ct� pT Disrric: Support Services _J .1 Field Operations Enczn= Suodiviston Engineering Traffic Engineerng ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service counter FROM: Field Operations C�%_ 940 Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. V / / �Li Name of Project Name of Developer Site Location . re me Mme (add s .. _ ..suffixl(lotl r.� (bldg) I have: inspected the grad thesubjectsite and. have- venifietl nd c �fication of soil the Engineer of Work, tlated compaction by the Soil Engineer- dared a:am heresy satisfied -that the. rough grading has been completed Itr- acdordance wish CMe:approved plans., specifications, Chapter :23!24-of the ;Municipal Code arrd'anV 6tkieF applicable engineering standards and- specific project requiremetn3: I Based.on my observation and the certifications,.) -take no:euception to the .issuance of a ;,: building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intendeq to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public Improvements, deferred monumentation. or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupant /. I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and Irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Signature of Senior Jvil Engineer, only it aparopiatel Reference: Building Permit No. roatel lDa[el Special Note: Submit this form, if mmvleted, to counter staff merely by placing a COPY of it in both engineering teclsmicians' in- baxes. please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperworic, When compieted. Office staff will handle the approoiam reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank. you. ISG /field3.docl _ _ -. ,_- -,.1 e,.c a v„b-,n .venue. Enuniru, Girmmia 92024.3633 -,DD 760 -635- -700 recycled paper JF i E�JGLNEERP. vG SER P7CES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Proiects Caty QT District Support Services Field Operations E f xm Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. S Name of Project Name of Develgper Site Locatlor�b� L )address:: - ..nLJmDer .• -str rname ...Suffix) aOtl Vag) K\ t( �t') I have.: inspected the grading:at the subjectsite an d•.haveuerifie[1 °de niacacertification h ad. bV the Engineer of Work, tlatetl — _ I:am hereby compaction by the Soil 'engineer, dared _ satisfied that the. rough grading has been comWeted rrn accordance::wft7Wthe: approved plans..-and specifcations, Chapter 23:24-0f the ,Municipal Code and{:any otkrer applicable engineeringstandards and'specifi(Z Project requirements. ' Based on -MY observation and the certifications__ take no exception to the Issuance ' of -a -: - building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if arty, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not inzentlecl to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availabilltY, any other public improvements, deferred manumentaton, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permitfs) and legal occupancy. I need to be further advised so that n final approved precise s planting irrigation) has been in accordance with the plan and specifications. (Slgna[ure of 3enrar Gvil Engineer. onry if aporopiare) Reference: Building Permit No. _-- (Dare) (Dare) special Note: Submit this farm, if completed, to counter staff meetly by placing a copy of it in both engineenng technicians' in- boxes. please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit o ajationwwith When completed. Office staff will handle the apprupiate mductions in security, if any, Building Inspectim Thal: you. ISG /fteidi.docl niru. Caiiiamia 920243633 —00 D 760 -u3� Z700 recycled paper . 1 'ca iaa run sns 5. VuVulcan .Avenue. tru ENGINEERJNG SERVICES DEPAR7MENT Capital Improvement Projects city OT Distdcc Support Services J Field Operations Encrn&as Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading PermiName of Project Name of Developer . Site Location _ � / -fix) r% bltlgJ faddress:: :...number srree[name f ( I have inspected the grading ,-at thesubject:site and. have,verifled 'certificationlo'fthe pa Y file Engineer of Work, dated — and certification of sail dated —_— l:am hereby compaction by the Soil Engineer, _ satisfied e-, the:.rougn grading has been completed: irFiaccordatiCe.,wf V the:aporoved` _.'. plans specifications, Chapter 23:24-of the Municipal Code, and any ot#iel applicable .I M engineering Standards a nd- specific project requirements: Based on my observation and the certifications,.) -take no. exception to the Issuance of a: building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, tills release is not intend CO t certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public Improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s1 and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. S)gnaiure of Senior MI. Engineef, dnlV ir" appropia[el Reference: Building Permit No. _ (Lace) face) Special Note: Submit this form, ff completed. to counter staff mealy by placing a copy of it id both engineering technidane' in•bmas. please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that papmvork, when completed. Office staff will handle the apprupiate reductions in security, if any, add coordination with Building Inspection.'. hank you. MG /field3.doc1 _... _._ .._ .111 enc a v,.inn Avenue. cndniru. ':adiiomia 920243633 "DD 760 - 633.2700 recycled paper ML E.7vGZ%VEERING SERVICES DER RTMENT capRal Imarovemem Projects cite) O Oistric: Support services JJ I I ceia Operations E72CM= suoaivision Engineering Traffic Engineering TO: FROM: RE: Name of ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter Field Operations Private contract: Inspection Grading Permit No. Cl ( _ -}-o Name of Developer Site Location 96—K ,• , Y�� .!address:: .numver - ..sVeernarne� ..sUfflxl -UO fbldgl I have.-inspected the grading= the subjectsite and .have- venfled'0 and certification of soil the :Engineer of Work, dated. Compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated J'am hereby satisfied .tliat the rough grading has been completed; imaccolddance wfstr the: aporoved, plans.,-and specifications, Chapter 2324-of the Municipal Cade, 2nd' ;any 6ttwr` applicable engineering standards and specific project requiremem3 " Based on my observation and the certifications, 1-take no: exception to the -issuance crf'a.- building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. /Signature of Senior Jvrl cnglneer, only it appropiare) Reference: Building Permit No. (Dare) (Date) W lo✓ bJ Special Nptc submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it is both engineering techni iann' in- boxes. Please remembet to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit coordination t with When completed. office staff will handle the appmpiare :eduction in security, if any, Building Inspection Thant: you. ISGlfield3.doc1 cep - r,cn�ai�627 505 S. Vui= Avenue. Enunim. ZSJifomia 920243633 i'JD 760 - 633 -:.'00 re ;��, t cycles paver n��e E.'VGINEERPNG SERVICES DEP.4RT1ffE1VT Capital Improvement ProjeCs city Of Disttic: Support Services Reta Operations EYICZYIjtCLS Suodivhion Enaineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Q G _�� Pnvate Contract Inspection a- ( o RE: Grading Permit No. 2,? t� Name of Protect l� rajj c, e )1) - Name of Developer Site I.DCdtipn n _��t��z'!-i —' - -...suffix) .(Intl •.,...(bidgJ , .. ... . .(address:.:...numoer ... srresc.name I have: inspected the grading:at thesubjectsite and. have'uerif led -ce picket tificatf a of soil 7. the Engineer of work, dated dated am hereby compaction by the Soil Engineer, satisfiedsthat the rough 9r -ading has been completed nt >accorcian¢e ;.w71 l7the:anproved plans,:znd specifications, Chapter .23:24-of the ,Municipal Code, antt.:anY baler applicable p engineering standards andl:specific project requiremem3 Based on my observation and the certifications,. I.- take no, exception to the lssuance -of-a building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase if arty, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intend e to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, d,dra1 age, ater, sewer, park deferred trail retl improvements, and their availability, anv monumentation; or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancl. I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Signature of Senior Gvil engineer, onlV rf aporopiace) Reference: Building Permit No. _ -- - -J— 0 2 fate) (Due) Special Noce: Submit this form, if completed to Counter staff mereiv by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians, in- boxes. °lease remember m do a final inspection of the grading permit ands submit coordination tpWivith When completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and Building Inspection. –,bank you. ISGifieid3.doc: :nc vniran Avenue. Encinitas, California 920243633 :'DD 760 -ti3i -2700 recycled paper '� 111641 FROM: ENGINEERING SER VICES DEPARTMENT city �f Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations EYLCtYd=s Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL A2, Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter Field Operations 0l 0 —�'q O Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading rP�e?rmit No. Name of Project _ \ice aa� Name of Developer — Site Location ll'�GU .!address:. - ...number ...street. name.. �.• +;.-: .suff(xP. oU f61dg1 - .... :.. I have inspected the grading „at•theSubject site and 1` 12Mterif led Titertiflmtfamafthe pad. by the Engineer of work, dated: °_ and certification of, soil compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated l ..Vam hereby satisfied that the rough grading has been completeti Im:acoordaHCa."W- - ,tl�e: approved plans - and specifications, chapter 23:24- of-- the municipal Code,-- ahtd::anV other applicable = ''r�i�' •- engineering standards and °specific project requirements. "'-: " ”: ..:.:....0 ""..> Based on my observation and the certifications, I take no exception to the issuance of-a:- building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and Irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Signature of senior Civil Engineer, only if appropiate) Reference: Building Permit No. (Dace) (Date) Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technfdand in- boxes. please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork when completed. Office staff will handle the appmpiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building ]nspectfom Thank you. JSG /field3.doc 1 7F1 760-633 -2600 1 FAX 760-633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760. 633 -2700 recycled paper TO: FROM: ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT city t7f Capital Improvement Projects Dishict Support Services Encbv s Re d Operations Subdivision Engineering iratfic Engineerng ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL 0� Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. Name of Project ^^ w' Name of Developer R ' ' �, site Location 4• J -•- (address : ...number streec name . .. -,'.- '•.• suffix) dot) (bldg) I have.inspected the gradinglat the.subjectsite and havexWifled'dertlficattonsof the pad by:- the Engineer of Work, dated. -'_J and certification of soil . compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated _ • lam hereby satlsfiect.that the. rough grading has been complete -M IR accordaAtedMrFFthe approved :'_ *• °: plans specifications, Chapter 23:24 of. the Municipal Code, arYd':a11y other applicable "�� ,. X. .and engineering standards and specific project requirements. " ' Based on my observation and the certifications, I- take no. exception to the issuance of-a., - :c =b' " •= building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concems, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail Improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if apprapiare) Reference: Building Permit No. _ __ 1 __9__ o _01— mace) roadel special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in bath engineering technicians' in- boxes. please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that pape ark, when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. 7SG /field1docl TEL 7160-633-2 600 I FAX 750.633-2627 505 s. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TDD 760 - 633 -2700 7t� recycled paper ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects City 0J- District Support Services Feld Operations EIW2 Ztd,S' Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering �v ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL l,M TO: FROM: RE: Name of Name of Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter Field Operations Private Contract Inspection Grading Permit No. Based on my observation and the certifications, l: take no exception to the issuance ortz building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail Improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation; or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed In accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Slgnature of Senior Gvil Engineer, only if appropiace) Reference: Building Permit No. _— -�- 0 2 (Date) (Date) Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection Thank you. JSG /field3.doc t TEL 760- 633 -2600 I FAX 760633 -1627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encini ras. California 920243633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 recycled paper 96tH- Site Location " --� .laddress- ...number ..srreetname..:. ,;.._.sufflxl -(IOt1 lbldgl .- •:• J have inspected the grading,•atthe subject site anGhave:wleelftetl ` tertiftcattansCftJie pad by.' '• ,- the Engineer of Work, dated . °_�• and certification of soil compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated — — I _i'am hereby satlsfied:that the rough grading has been completed. itt accordance_ -.w. the:approved, n =_ plans and specifications; Chapter 23:24 of the Municipal COde, aAY3'any GIth8r applicable �j'• i' engineering standards andspecific project requirements., Based on my observation and the certifications, l: take no exception to the issuance ortz building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail Improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation; or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed In accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Slgnature of Senior Gvil Engineer, only if appropiace) Reference: Building Permit No. _— -�- 0 2 (Date) (Date) Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection Thank you. JSG /field3.doc t TEL 760- 633 -2600 I FAX 760633 -1627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encini ras. California 920243633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 recycled paper ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects City Of District Support Services Field Encinitas Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL X0'01 V 70: FROM: RE: Name of Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter Field operations Private Contract Inspection Grading Permit No. Name of Developer Site Location (address ...number ...streetname ?. +:. r ...suffix) (lot) (bldg) I have inspected the grading, thesubjectsite and:haVe YlEdflad'Certificatiomof the pad by "' ' ••'''' the Engineer of work, dated and certification of soil . compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated — I •: l:am hereby satisfied that the rough grading has been completed in, accordance Whit ; the. approved, plans and specifications, Chapter 2124-of the Municipal a Code, nd' :any dtlserapplicable engineering standards and specific project requirements: "f! "• •' - " "' Based on my observation and the certifications, l take no. exception to the issuance oYa -. - ' i b'•`' '•':' building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specificatlons. (Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if appropiate) Reference: Building Permit No. 1 o (Date) (Date) Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff mealy by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork when completed. office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. JSGIfield3.ciocl � . 760- 633.2600 1 FAX 7601[33 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 tb recycled paper ,H P.�ril etty. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering r ROUG GRADING APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. le 77 Name of Name of Developer r n site Location ��-•— ,,.a� - .:' faddreSS ...number ... street name . ...SufflxP (IotJ Vag) .... :.:..�: - I haveanspected the grading,�at the.subjectsite and, havemeelfler!`ftilldflcation.af the pad: by. the Engineer of work, dated •` . ' =J and cerdfigti � on of_soil . compaction by the Soil Engineer, tlated Cam hereby satisfied that the. rough grading has been completed. lrr:accordan¢edcwWthe:approvedI plans.and specifications, chapter 21.24-of -the ,Municipal Code; arY&AM -Other' applicable l'• X. engineering standards and: specific project requirements. " ' • • - ::° Based on my observation and the certifications, l take no exception to the issuance of-a. building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail Improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation; or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and Irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. !Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if approviacel Reference: Building Permit No. mate) (Dater Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. ISG /field3.doc1 TEL 760- 633.2600 1 FAX 760.633 -2627 505 S. Vulnrt Avenue, Encinitas. California 920243633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 recycled paper TO: FROM: ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects City Of District Support Services Encinitas Feld Operations SubdHision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL �0 Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter Field operations Private contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. Name of Name of Developer site Location �v.- .!address : -- ...number ._Stre n eta me -. ..SuffixP oil FJ (bidg) .. J have.inspected the gradingrat the.subjectsite and+haVeAt"fled °Certificattan ^of the pad by: = " "v ;: <• '` the Engineer of work, dated: -4 and certification of soil _ compaction by the Soil Engineer, - dated — + :J:am hereby satisfied that the rough, grading has been compteteMtn :accordance:.wiWthe: approved, � • plans and specifications, Chapter 23:24-of the Municipal Code ;arr&.:any- GU%rappllcable" engineering standards and specific project requirements. ' eased an my observation and the certifications, i take no exception to the Issuance of-& building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concems, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail Improvements, and their availability, any other public Improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and Irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if approprate) Reference: Building Permit No. (Date) (Date) Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by plating a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building inspection. Thank you. JSG /field3.docl TEL 760 - 633 -2600 I FAX 760 - 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas. Califomia 920243633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 recycled paper ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects City Of District Support Services Encinita Subdivision Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering nv ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: FROM: RE: Name of Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter Field operations Private Contract Inspection Grading Permit No. Name of Developer —}r,J Site location (address :: ...number ...street name �...5uERx1 (IOU Vg) , ..:.,�:.... I have.inspected the gradinglat the.subjectsite and haV&Xecifled'CertifIcatton.of the pad: by the Engineer of Work, dated:,: and certification of soil. compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated — t , -f:am hereby satisfied that the rough grading has been completed; irT :accordallce:WFtll' =thec approved, plans and specificatjorts, Chapter 23:24-of the Municipal Code,antV.any -other applicable engineering standards and specific project requicemerits.''-: -•. . Based:on, tray observation and the certifications, 1-take no exception to the issuance Of-& b' building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentatlon, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Signature of Senior Uvil Engineer, only if appropia[e) Reference: Building Permit No. _ - (Date) (Date/ Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. please rememba to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. 1SG /field3.docl TEL 760 -633 -2600 1 FAX 760. 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TDD 760633 -2700 recycled paper ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects City Of District Support Services Field Operations ErIC2 Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineerng Jf ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL 70: FROM: RE: Name of Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter Field Operations Private Contract Inspection Grading Permit No. Name of Developer Site Location faddress::: ... number ... street name .. .... ...suffix) (lot) Vag) - I have.lnspectetl the grading�t the subject site and havex[erJfled,certtficatiomsof the pad: by the Engineer of work, dated: and certification of soil compaction by the Soil Engineer, tlated _ . -I am hereby satisfied that the rough grading has been completed ln:accoYtlance,vAt the: approved, plans and specifications, Chapter 23:24 of the Municipal Code, art& ;w Y oUmr applicable engineering standards andt specific project requirements. Based on my observation and the certifications, I take no exception to the issuance of—&— •- building permit for the lotls) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and Irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. I o�L- (Date) (Signature of senior civil Engineer, only if appropiate) (Date) Reference: Building Permit No. Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians, in- boxes. please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. JSG /field3.docl TEL 760{33 -2600 1 FAX 760633 -2627 505 S. Vulatt Avenue, Enunins, California 920243633 TDD 760633 -2700 recycled Paper p' a s TRACT PLANCHECK WORKSHEET LOT/UNIT MODEL P - ADDRESS Z s Z6 � z � r� 1`t'ee l7 ri ✓ 1 -c zj!-7)Z Z—jS I�z, r��Ya2 1�r�✓ �S :lD-] r-�tr� br, y l-- r I v -2-9 Z ��, r� ✓eQ D r i✓ 30 � I �- -i Z � � � i r- .-t-Y� i�+-� ✓ fS g-7 51-a1r - Sa�n,ine Lid , . :3� Z Srt21� �_Z�r,�ir2 L_ G --7 ✓ r2z, , -r-�ee fir, 1t) !r;O s 1 3-7 15-10 IN t /-/0 - �) y 5-11 z 2/c� �z -I-,. r-, t civ ✓�— �� r' ENGEgEERING SERVICES DEP4R.' jMENT Capital Improvement Prolec^ C,i7 v QJ D&hct support services 2� 1* ^field Operations DT JJ subdivision Engineering iraffic Engineering L ROUGH GRADING 4PPRO -p: Subdivision Engineering public Service Counter =ROM: Field operations Pnvate Contra= Inspe=rion �pti �0' -/ 1� RE: Grading PerMItt�NC. jo / / S Name of Project �v�1 S� Name of Developer .GX �� Site Location aadbress.:: _..numoer vee' name. .^•...S�ffXY 11 (b1b91 -•�- I haveAnspected the gradingrat thesubjectsite and have4xmdflet!`certification7of the pad by the - Engineer of Work, dated _- and certification of soil compa.cticu7 by the Soil Engineer, tltetl 3:am hereby LiacdOn saLisfteEt-that the rough grading has been compietettFdanEe :WkttY =Ehe:appfdvetl "= pians•.and-SDECifications, Chapter 23:24-of-the Municipal'Codg; antV ;WK- oUmr•epplIC2ble =.. .t? - engineering stmndards and'spscific project requ'rremenrs 3ased on my observation and the certifications, -1 -ta0 na;excecition to the issuance of-3:- building permit for the Iotts) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not Intended to certify the project with respect to ottier engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deterred morlumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permitisi and legal occupancy, I need = be further advised so that l can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. �._�_ (Signature of Engrneenng InspeCtorl !0 re) (Signature of Senior DWI Engineer, only if approrilate) (Dare/ Reference: Building Permit No.4—/—Z4 Suedal Note: submit this in=, if completed, to eormter staff merely br viacing a cuor of it in both engineering teenxumans• in- bores. please remember to do a final inavecdon of the gading permit and submit that pave miY when compieted. office staff will handle the approptare reductions in seeuzity, if ang, and coordination with Building!na ecti= Tnanlc you. JSG 1fie1d3.dac1 T.1. "60- 633:.600 FAX i60- 633 -2027 505 S. Vui= Avenue, Encinins. Cauiomia 92024 -3G35 D 760-633-27W r recvcrou caner �• Illy y l+i K.4I �lLl'6J ENGINEERLNG SERVICES DEP4RTjWENT Caoiial Improvement Projects Distric Support Services Field Operaficns suodlvision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRU4DING A aPRO V L' ;D; Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit �.No. �77c5//-1p� Name of Project e 124*/ Name of Developer Site Location '...suffiw f! - ddlagJ ._ .•�: . aadares;.' numoer ... sr7ee[ name . have inspected the grading,at thesubjeczsite ancLhave vierJfied'cerdffcatian'Of thepad by the :En9UII er of Work, dated and certification of, soil compaction bW the Soil Engineer, dated" —'" iJ:am hereby . satisfieri that the..rougn grading has been comWete &.toacmrclarlee:wlttrilMe: approved, jolans..and-specifications, Chapter 2Z.214-of -the MUnicip01 Cade, arrd arty "a13Tet'BRPIIcdble' T� engineering standards anorspecific project repu ire msrr[s Based on my observation and the certifications,.! -take no exception to `lMe _issuance'of'Z. building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase if any, but only In so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended- to certify the project with resoec zo other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, paric, and trail improvements, and their availabllity, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permitls) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in aczDrdance with the approved plans and specifications. !signature or 55glrleenng InspeL[ar/ (signature of Senlcr Jvii c "ngineer, onry if appropface)/ (Dare Reference: Building Permit No4L—�/ Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely br Placing a crrpy of it in both mpmemng technicians' in- boxes. Please reatearber m cio a final inspection of the grading permit and submit flat Panmrvmi:, when comoleterL office staff will handle the apprupiate reductions in senuity, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. JSGISeid"a.docl JS 7a 760.633 -26110 I TAX 766.633 -2627 505 S. Vuican Avenue. Encimm, =ai fomia 924243633 7DD 760-653-.700 INC- recycled paper -�_Wk� EIVGINEERL(VG SERVICES DEP.4RaA1EAT MW capRal Improvement Proiecs r I• CZvy Ql oistdcc: Support Services _ _J Relic Oaerc ions Suodivision Enaineenna Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRA?FNO 4PPR€?V A_ TO: Subdivision Engineering JO� Public Service counter r I� =ROM: Field operations C1 lq —�L(( _o /1 I Private contract inspection C/ RE: Grading Permit No. -kZ25 Name of Project Name of Developer Ll If) r+ Site Location (address, ::...numner ._=eet.name .. 1 have1rispected the gradingl,rL thesable=site and: have. verif led -certification °of the pad: by >. the :Engineer of Work, oared _— and certification of_soll. compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated "' `J:am•herepy satisfieds ttlat the: rough gr-ad'mg has been completed:icf accordance:nukttsLhe:gboroved a plans.. nd - specifications, Chapter 2324- of-the :MunicMahEode;•and WW-other applicable engineering:standards arimspecific project requlremanIZ Based -on my observation and the certifications,A-mice Ad BXCeptiCn to the issuance'.dfar- crb ; building permit for the lolls) as noted or Phase if any, but only in so far as grading Is concerned. However, this release is not intentlea o certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail Improvements, and their availability, any other public Improvements, deferred monumentation. or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (Le., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Signature Of Senior Ovi) Engineer, only jr a proplacer Reference: Building °ermit No. //__Z1.!/ (D Lei (Dare) Suedal Note: Submit this if completed to counter staff mereiy br viaang a copy of it in both enginemng teeeisnioans' in- boxes. ?lease remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that papenv¢rac. When campieted. Office staff will candle the appropiace reductions in seeurit{', if any, and coardinatio¢ with Building inspecdou. Tnmk vou. JSGlfield3.docl 'El_ 760.633 -2600 1 TAX 760 - 63}26'7 505 :. Vulnn Avenue, Snc w=, :ai iomia 920243633 7DD 760 -633 -2700 `!„ recyctee oaoer TO FROM: ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects City of District support Services Field Operations LEr1C212= Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter Field operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. Name of Project Name of Developer Site Location r 7 iadoress ...numver ..streecrlarre C(q a �3� �..... ..saw n6v roldgl J l'" 1 have;inspe ted the grading at thesubjectsite ana:have.werifled certifFcatioynsdf the pad bry�; the .Engineer of work, dated - and certification of soil' -`- compaction by the Soil Engineer, datetl -' 1 am hereby .satisfied that the:.rough grading has been comMetedslcfi�ccorciance NUlt1� =the: approved' :'- ,plans..and specifications, Chapter 23.24 °of-the Municipal Code, and wW-other applicable - engineering standards and specific project requirements.,"';? Based:on my observation and the Certifications,_I-take no exception tothe'issuance . of.a building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , If any, but only In so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intendea to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public drainage, blle�impro sewer, Park, deferred improvements, and their availabllity, any other monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. fD re) 9u nnnagn rl (Signature ofSertior Civil Engineer, only it appropiate) Reference: Building Permit No.& , fDatel Special Nate: Submit this form, if completed, to cronter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember in do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will 'handle the appropiam reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building inepectien. Thant: you. ISG /field3.doc1 Ai TEL 7611{33-2600 I FAX 760-633.2627 505 S. vulcan Avenue. Encini¢s. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760.633.2700 'a- reCVC1e0 Dauer /14 yJPCAt1 TO FROM: ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects City of District support Services Field Operations LEr1C212= Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter Field operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. Name of Project Name of Developer Site Location r 7 iadoress ...numver ..streecrlarre C(q a �3� �..... ..saw n6v roldgl J l'" 1 have;inspe ted the grading at thesubjectsite ana:have.werifled certifFcatioynsdf the pad bry�; the .Engineer of work, dated - and certification of soil' -`- compaction by the Soil Engineer, datetl -' 1 am hereby .satisfied that the:.rough grading has been comMetedslcfi�ccorciance NUlt1� =the: approved' :'- ,plans..and specifications, Chapter 23.24 °of-the Municipal Code, and wW-other applicable - engineering standards and specific project requirements.,"';? Based:on my observation and the Certifications,_I-take no exception tothe'issuance . of.a building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , If any, but only In so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intendea to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public drainage, blle�impro sewer, Park, deferred improvements, and their availabllity, any other monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. fD re) 9u nnnagn rl (Signature ofSertior Civil Engineer, only it appropiate) Reference: Building Permit No.& , fDatel Special Nate: Submit this form, if completed, to cronter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember in do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will 'handle the appropiam reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building inepectien. Thant: you. ISG /field3.doc1 Ai TEL 7611{33-2600 I FAX 760-633.2627 505 S. vulcan Avenue. Encini¢s. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760.633.2700 'a- reCVC1e0 Dauer • City of Esz 7n=s 0: =ROM: RE: Name of Proj ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTiYI= CaoBal Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineermg ROUGH GR.ALDING APPROVAL Subdivision Engineering Cununtr Public Service Coer r (/ 1 Field Operations 0l7 - t;I.•-4C> Private contract Inspection - Grading Permit No. Name of Developer_ Site Location .cadoress. ::...n m e 0 1J Ll -..... ...suffix) 0=/ ,. (Dldg) have inspected the grading,•atthesubje=site and�nave °verfied'cer- dfrcationsof the Pad by the :Engineer of Work, datetl _— and certfication of soil compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated t `i-am Hereby satisfleet::that the .rough grading has peen comojeteds tp :ac,Ardanc..ANW>the:aporovedr plans ,.2nd - specifications, chapter .23:2C-of-the MunicMal-Code,' and a W'F10M Oppl1Cable " F enginseringstandards and specific project requiremen5. -T,' Based ;on mV observation and the certifications,.) -take no.exception to the:issuance'of building permit for the lotts) as noted or Phase If any, but only In so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intentleo to certify the project with respect td other engineering concerns, including publin Other dr publie improvements, at �weer, deferred park, improvements, and their availabllltV, a monumentation; or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permitls) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised sc that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. 6 o �-- (Slgnarure of 5nglnn�etenng lnspecror) (C te! (Signature of senior civil Engineer, only if aooropiam (Care) Reference: Buiiding Permit No.A/--2ZZ(1- Special Note: Submit this form, if comalmed, to counter staff mezeiv by placing a cove of it is both engineering tecitmoaas' in- boxes. °lease remember m do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that naperwork, whm comvieted. Office staff will handle the apprnpiate reductions in security, if anT, and coordination with Building inspection- : hank you. JSG /fieid3 -doc1 ;a 76D- 6331600 /FAX 766.63 3.2677 505 S. Vuian Avenue, Enunimx.:aiiiomia 926243633 —ID0 760.633' °700 " recvcreri owner �• c -1Y 0 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEn4F"-j EA7 Capital improvement Proie ^s Oismc: support Services Fels Operations suodivision Engineering iroffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING A PPS A. ;O. subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter =ROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. CIE / /S Name of Project /LL✓ f Name of Developer Site location L�" Q°t� "" .faddress: ...pumper ,aeet.name . - - -- ...SU1.fYX1 ( dd f ra4l :...•.. . nave inspected the grading.'at thesubjectrs(te and: navemerlfleWcertiflmtlon'Of the pad: by', ` "' ° "'J' ° <• the Engineer of Work, Dated _— and certification ofsbil compaction by the Soil Engineer, datetl l. am Hereby satisfied that the .rough grading has been comptetetl iGr arCOrtlance wiL1Y =fie :apgrovetl• pians..2nd specifications; chapter.23 :24-of the !Muni Code artC,arW rer;applimble 71W engirreering stancards ana�specific project requiremeM3 Based:on my observation and the certifications, ..r -.take na.exception to the : issuance - .of-.2; - building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only In so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not lntendec to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permits) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if aPoropiiaCe) Reference: Buiiding permit Noa--ZZ�; ro ce,' (Dare) Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to tommte staff merelc bn placing a copy of it in bath cogineenng techpioans' in- boxes. °lease remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and suiamit that paperwork, when comvleted. Office staff will handle the approoiate reductions in seco ity, if any, and courdination with Building inspection. ; nanl: you. ISGlfield3.docl . _i. 76D- 635 -2600 'FAX 760.63 3-2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, cneinias, California 92024 -3633 TDD 76M33-' 700 recvcted oaoer E'yG1ArEERING SERVICES DFTAR j NT City QJ CaoRal Improvement Projecrs • Distnc. SuDDart Services Reto operations _E72CL =i2S Subdivision Engmeemg iroffic Engineering O; Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter =ROM: Field Operations Private Contra CZ InspeCLlon rTV RE: Gmding Permit ND. l 775 Name of Project Name of Developer v rl Site Location YM -� (1'� ...... _'.suffix: o 4171041. .... iaddress::; ...numoer .srreeT name - -- I have inspected the gradingrat the subject site and :have�verifled'ci�iffcatia.nirof the pad: by the Engineer of wor(, - dated _, and certification of sail compaction by the Soil Engineer, : dated a'am hereby satisfietr =at the .rough gradirlg has been cbmpler airs accdrdanceawit ithe:aporoved plans:.antl speclficatiorts, Chapter.23:24-ofYtse Munleipai Code_ and arW otiter'O1 P- .. Gle engineering standards and,sbecific project requiremerrts. Based on mV observation and the certifi cations, .l-take nd:exception to the issuance !of -a- building permit for the Iotts) as noted or Phase , if anV, but onlV In so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intenarto certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road. drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availanllltV, anV other public improvement✓, deterred monumentation; or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permirm and legal occupan`/, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. ( SignatUre or Snglneering IfISpeCLof) (D TPJ (Signature of Senior GVII Engineer, oniy if appropiace) (Dare) Reference: Building Permit No. ZZ—�l 1 Speoal Note: Submit this form, if comnleted, to counter staff mereiy bn viaeins a error of it in both engmeemng technicians, in -boxes Please remember to do a final inspection of the wading permit and submit that nanerwori:, when compieted. office staff will nandle the appmpiare reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building inspection. Thank you. JSG /fieid3.doc1 7E1. 760.633 -2600 !FAX 760-63 3-2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenues Enciniras, Caiiiomia 92024 -3653 TDD 760 -633-2700 recycled paper NPVIZI TO: FROM: RE: E.WGLyEERl)vG SERVICES DEP4 J"AfENT CZry Of caortal Imorovement ?roiears Distrtc: SUr)aeri Service$ nelc CDerations 3� Subdivision Engneenng irofflc Engineermg ROUGH GIRIL OING APPRO%A1. - � rk �—< Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter Field operations Private Contra= inspection Grading Permit NO. Name of Project 11, - Name of Developer Site Location ^ / I4 —' —" miagl :laddress.' : ... numner ...=Bet. name .. - •� - suxr (lot) the subject site and: have ueriftedreertiftcattan'Of the. pad by I haveAnspected the grading:at oated - and certification of Solt the : Engineer of work, - by the Soil Engineer, ;: tl8ted —" ' l:am hereby. ". compaction satisfreatthat tne:.rough- grading has:oeen completed W.accordanc. -.,WWl the approved, arty'4rt3Te� BWllmble plans -and- specifications, Chapter 23.24-of-the ;MUmapai CAde aRU _ �c_` engineering standards and - specific project requirements..- Basetl on tnV observation and the certifications , -I take no exception to the issaance'.of-a_ building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase I if anV, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not inzendeo to certify the project with respe= to other engineering concerns, including public road, dr-al water, sewer, park deterred improvements, and their availability, any public monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permitls) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. -j oI-- (signs ring )nspecLoq rD Ce. (Signature of senior Civil Engineer, only if appropia[e) (Darer Reference: Building Permit No. Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merel7 by placing a copy of it in both engmeenng tectmidans' in•bmes. °lease remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that uaperwori:. wbea comvieted. office staff will bandle the appmi3mte reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building inspection. Toni you. JSG /field3.docl TEL 76D433.2600 i FAX 760- 63 }262i 505 S. Vulnrt Avenuc. Encirtiras. Caiiiomia 920243633 TDO 760 -G3 -2700 recycrea Dater ENGINEERING SERVICES DERAPUnj LEA7 --portal Improvement Proiecrs • Gity of Distric support Services Field Operations �� ticci%iurs Suodivision Engineering iroffic Engineering ROUGH GR— A-DING APPPO V AL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field operations lip 2((6 Private Contract Inspection –l0 Nl RE: Grading Permit No. A779 Name of ProjeCt 1 ' Name of Developer A J �Q�� Site Location i– ` V� d ..suffrw xnt (d(int 0g) ,laddress.c: ... nu per ...srreet n2m& - - I have inspected the gradingtat thesubjectarte aria have'Verif led 'certlficationtof the pad: by ..and certification of soil. the Engineer of work,. - oared — compa.ctton by the soil Engineer, datetl- — 1: am hereby sat)sfled;- at the. rough •grading has, been compietetl irf.acdoGdanGe WitiP =�he:approved plans,,-and- specifications, Chapter.Z3:24 °ofIfte Municipal Code, °and',any'oUer ap'plloble engineering stantlards and,specific project requiremer[a .. _.. Based:onmy observation and the certlfications,.l -Sake no. exception to the -issuance .of-.a- building permit for the Iotlsl as noted or Phase , if any, but onlV in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intendeo to certify the project with respec to other engineering concerns, ncluding public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, anV other public improvements, deferred monumentarion; or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permits) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verifY that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and speclficaricim. (Signature or Engineering Inspecro0 (C [e) (Signature Of Sen10f :VII Z: qi:: er, only if appropiate) (Fare) G Reference: Building Permit Naz9z— -v Special Notc. Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely bn oiacing a cope of it in both engineering technicians, in- boxes. ?lease remember to an a final inspection of the goading permit and submit that iwt" r prs, when completed. Office staff will handle the appmpiare reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building inspection. Thank vim. JSGlfieidS.doc1 TEL 760. 633 -2600 1 FAX 760-63}2(17 505 S. Vol= Avenue. Encinitas. Cal fomia 92024 -3633 71)D 760-4533-2700 `U� recvcreo saner 04/26/02 14:25 12909 693 3320 SB &0 16001/002 SB &0 SB &O, INC. FAX TRANSMITTAL PLEASE DELIVER TO THE PERSON LISTED BELOW AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THANK YOU. TO: f �armrn s+y CO: FAX NO. %r'o0 -l0 �� Z� /? FROM: -D*Nj ageo e'r DATE: ';4— n-oz. JOB NO. TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: y Land RE: _ LJ� �/ Lac/ Z - LUT �� `Pe,4^44erE Planning CO //MM,E`N..TS: CY�YiTd✓ WOvtd C /KC-- Td Add A-,.J iti�ET'0� Lor /o 404c) IA6- V'4 TEL- /(nj Dw- Q�� ar Tn Cd �rTb T7f� /fir &n ryF- Af*e (/4y&4 civil r'cJ /GG Ttf�- GTy �� OAK. �//JN TM,t .' C'� kJE idJ -Pti« Cn inQP.1'ing «: � .SIB /YI /K 760- 63447& ¢ $iL4" C- 0Ldti./ X60 - X04 -7�/6 Land IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS RECEIVING THIS FAX, PLEASE CALL (909) 693 -3310. Surrtying FOR SB &O IN-HOUSE USE ONLY OPERATOR: TO BE RETURNED: TO BE FILED W: ADMINIFORMSTAX.FORM.wpd Sepmmber 25. 2000 Corporule Office: 3615 Kearny Villa Ro;id, Soile'_011 San Dieu. ('.A 92123 ♦ Phone (.45R) 560 -1141 17ax (95u) 560 -""157 9007 Arrow ROIIIC, Sail; 120 • Ranchn Cacanlonp. ('A 1) 1730 1 Phone (901)) 94K -+450 Fax (909) 949 -2750 27715 Jcllcraon Avenue. Smile -III •'fcniceula. CA 92590 ♦ Phunc f 909 6931-:310 Pax (9091 6931 -3320 FF =79.50 1 15, 63 + l 10.3 26, V D F. 1> e ,� 20.0' D'F I m q � �� O N° i� ; � i m a 3C R RE '9 PAD =74.6 5.0 FF-75. 10 ?::_ > #_ PAD -77.2 1 ' 'I 13.7 '.r..> =r FF =77.70 O 4 w h _ 71.00' Ri , T-i 711 2.9� 0 6� o IhI K� ro 1 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT f TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) 5( Traffic Engineering (TE) O District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) El Field Operations (FO) ❑ T .69., ~i 0 O ATTENTION: DOrl3 Or r44009 GC— DATE: O Z Regarding (Finance Number G 77 t'- Gam, DEPOSIT/FEE TPMfrM/MUP/MIN/DR: ai $ - 2440 (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE 11 S" /w41i1 (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Pared Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Comments /Additional Space for Document: Interoffice Memorandum* ❑ Plancheck Comments* ❑ C.CRJRt7c rJ CT`s W / 4061.tW . dsffgx!(G L S DE Pr rjtp ' Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ PJF— /SS V&—S Easement re: Covenant re: ,g�f�JU,it(711L Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ ( Staff/ ConsultanVCD /Fire/SDWD /OMWD /LCWD) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Sketch (if needed): Agreement re: f1 Improvements F] Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ (-1 GD to K • �S t�t1,tN.l Eh.*'TS t� +tom Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments' ❑ (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage /Water /Sewer /Trai I/Park/Faci lity) Intermediate Description: ----- -------- ----- ------ - - - - -- --- ---- - -- ----- •---- ---- --- --- Grading Plan ® Check Plan Change Description: Approved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments* l.��r�p+� el►tlJar (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Hydrology Study/Map ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review tg Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction �{ mment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return Z Sam 19 •Lt(.iu�r J FISA WOM Please call: -760 G33 Z'782 if necessary Originator: D. TKD%"%;' � µ Copies to: F1 L.E V Messenger Mail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ 1 Received b Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR /Ger grans. duu102 11 99 1 of ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (N 1) T Community Develooment- Current Planning %e O Fire-Fire Prevention ATTENTIOtk San Dieguito Water District- Eneineerinst & Planning � /l � Conmunity Services — Parks & Beaches DATE: F Capital Improvement PM oislrici support Son Field Opera Subdivision Ert finer TroMe Englnee Traffic Engineering (TE) Field Operations (FO) ❑ Regarding (Finance Number 6� ✓ - �'�EPOS /FEE �P/M R: _ (Finance Number _) DEPOS (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE A Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map C] Final Map C] Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original If New or Revised I Comments/Additional Space for Document: Improvetaest Pla s ❑ Check Checkprint If Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised ading Pla I Check «1' eckprint / pproved Copy / Original / New or Revised • ( Staff / Consultant /CD/Fue/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/Water /Sewer /Trai VPark/Faci I ity) Description: Plan Change Description: (Mass/Rough/Prelim in ary/Precise) (Erosioi)ControVPlanting & Irrigation) As Per .. Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑- Our Review 1(30�ur Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction ❑�^, Comment (/j°�r� Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses Cl Please return C Please call: if necessary Originator Copies to 505 South Vdlcdn Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 aSGA1RWlnmr Trans doc /03 02 99 1 ot 1 SB TRANSMITTAL OTO: City of Encinitas DATE: 2 -28 -02 SB &O, INC. 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 JOB NO: 57142.50 ATTN: Phil Cotton FROM: Tony Pisculli RE: Bay Laurel We are transmitting the following via hand delivery. ❑ For Your Review /Approval ❑ Revi wed as Noted ❑ For Your Information ❑ requested No. of Copies No. of Sheets D ption Date 3 sets Landscape Plans COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY: cc: TP /jgm DATE: LAND PLANNING +CIVIL ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 +Temecula, Califomia +92590 +(909) 693 -3310 +Fax (909) 693 -3320 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTAIFENT `I TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Project District Support Service Field Operation: Subdivision Engineenni Traffic Engmeerm FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director (N I) S Field Operations (FO) ❑ T O ATTENTION: ��/�� G tCr7je4ee- DATE: Regarding (Finance Number r,0775 DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Interoffice Memorandum' ❑ Plancheck Comments' ❑ Legal Description O Plat ❑ Other: ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage p ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: I l Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maroc. ❑ n Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments" ❑ - -- - - - --- -� -------- -- --- --- --------- --- -- -- - - - --- Grading Plan CCS% C ^heck Checkprint/Approved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments'.® Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Hydrology Study/Map ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ TPM/TM/MUP/MIN /DR: APN: Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • (Staff/Consulta CD 'ire/SDWD /OMWD /LCWD) Sketch (i?needed)-45- dLt!/►GG2�5 O.t_1 /�Lpp.i3 (Public /Private) (Road/Drainage/Water/Sewer/Trail/Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: (Mass/Rough/Prelim inary/Precise) (Erosion Control /Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction ❑ Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return Please call: 1(00- (OaSS'Z�3 if necessary Originator �� Copies to: Messenger ❑ Mail ❑ Facsimile Received by: A Title: Location: Other ❑ Date: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633 - 2770 /FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SGbARR Generic Trms dne: d? 11 99 I Oft ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) B Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (k 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: a-qN4 7T�42 DATE: �2- �/Oj Regarding (Finance Number 677S' -6_) DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corrected p Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title reportNesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Corporate/Parmership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red•lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. Grading Plan 3� bmnta n Change /As -built Proposed ❑ Co rected [� Appr cc • ❑ Blueline/Red -lined Checkprint Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations [� Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. As Per... Submitta^l Re irements (T Our Conversation ❑ For Your... Review [ Use ❑ Approval ❑ ORIGINATOR: (Name) TPM/I'M/MUP/MIN/DR: '96, -_Z# APN: Comments/Additional Space for Document 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other 6) Copies to: Additional Notes: 14-1L-4c- • ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/T /CATV) Sketch (if needed) / Description: (Public/Private) (Ro ad/Drainage/W ater /Sewer /Trai VPark/Fac i I ity ) (M ass/Rough/Prel im inary/Precise) (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) Public [nquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SWARRAntra Trans. dod02.11.99 I A I ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement project District Support Service. Field Operat� Subdivision Engineevril Traffic Engineenril FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ® Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T ✓� /� 0 ATTENTION: // CJIem�� DATE: Regarding (Finance Number Gl7S -(�_) DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE TPM/fM1MUP/M1 nN/DR:- �s1tKd IrA /ri AZ4— " (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Comments/Additional Space for Document: Interoffice Memorandum* ❑ Plancheck Comments* ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ ?asernent re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail p Improvements ❑ '( Staff/ Consuhant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD /LCWD) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Sketch (if needed): Agreement re: �I Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ (� Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments' ❑ (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/Water/Sewer/'Trail/Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: -------.--- .--- ----- -- ---- -2-- - - - - -- - - - - - -- Grading Plan,® Check Plan Change Description: Che�rkprmt/App�ved Coj� /Origm—aVRe' cted Plancheck Commen ' ❑ F/�c ___ �J fi�J•• � etlf� �-a (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precl Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Hydrology Study/Map ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ (Erosion ControUPlanting & Irrigat n) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ ur Approval ❑ For your... Correcti ❑ Comment ❑ Signature Please return z rat- Please call: ❑ Information ❑ ses ❑ 7400 - — Z if necessary Originator. "- f ies to: if —LLe=— Messenger ❑ Mail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ Received by: Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92021 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARRIC¢ncric Trans doc /02 1 199 1 of 1 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION DATE: Regarding (Finance Numbers DEPO T/FE /DR: _ (Finance Number DEPOSI EE (Finance Number _� DEPOSITTEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • ( CD/ CS/ FIRFJSDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &FJT /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blue line/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other bl cks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer /TraiUPark/Facility) Grading Plan Submitt471an Change/As-built- Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Appmid ❑ cc ' ❑ Blueline /Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submitt equlrements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review_ Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR (Name (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Itura Trans . doc /02.11.99 I of I ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Copilol Improvement Projects District Support services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) [LJ Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (iil) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: b� / /�rt�db/ti DATE: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ Regarding (Finance Number 77,57' -1_) DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ _ Submittal/Amended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title reportNesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re'. ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ '• , I Comments/Additional Space for Document 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: Additional Notes: rle � • ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &FJr /CATV) Sketch (if needed) / Description: Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Road/Drainage/Water /Sewer /TraiVPark/Facility) Grading Plan 12/ 3� v bmrtta Change /As -built Proposed ❑ Corrected [}� Appr cc' ❑ Blueline/Red -lined Checkprint Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil RNeport ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations LK Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Mass/Rough/Prel irn inary/Precise) (Erosion Controt/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Re irements [� Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: �* (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARMnin Trans. doc /01 11.99 1 of I sa„s,N HOROWITZ TAYL T ENGINEERINF' l 3914 Murphy Canyon Suite A -100 San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 560 -4383 FAX (858) 560.8842 TO C�`��A .r WE ARE SENDING YOU /4 Attached [Prints ❑ Shop drawings C Copy of letter DATE -roe NO ATTENTIONL� ✓/V/ y`��[� RE: Aov , ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Change order Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval For your use �As requested > "I • For review and comment • FORBIDS DUE ❑ ❑ El ❑ LETTEt OF TRANSMITTAL ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US DATE -roe NO ATTENTIONL� ✓/V/ y`��[� RE: Aov , ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Change order Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval For your use �As requested > "I • For review and comment • FORBIDS DUE ❑ ❑ El ❑ Approved as submitted Approved as noted Returned for corrections ❑ ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO Qit.�lLOc�J ��dtnCby.�b S 1/ /b SIGNED:1�� It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. " S B &0 SB &O, INC. TO: City of Encinitas DATE: 12 -19 -01 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 JOB NO: 57142.22 ATTN: Duane Thompson FROM Daniel J. O'Rourke RE: Bay Laurel - Lafferty Wall We are transmitting the following via Overnight Mail. ❑ For Your Review /Approval ❑ Reviewed as Noted ❑ For Your Information ❑ As Requested No of Copies No of Sheets Description Date 1 2 Original letters of permission to grade for Lafferty & Hall COMMENTS: Please call if you have any questions. f:T0il21l92197 - -yj cc: DJO /jgm DATE: LAND PLANNING+CIVIL ENGINEERING +LAND SURVEYING 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201 +Temecula, Califomia192590f(909) 693 - 3310 +Fax (909) 693 -3320 December 20, 2001 CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 RE: Bay Laurel City of Encinitas Tract No. 95 -240 Letter of Permission for Grading Dear Sirs: We are the owners, or have interest in, the property adjacent to the above referenced project. We have reviewed the grading plans, structural wall plans and landscape and irrigation plans, and are satisfied with the improvements shown thereon. We hereby grant Greystone Homes, Inc. the right to grade upon and across said property, in accordance with City of Encinitas Drawing No. 6775 -G. Sincerely, 0 William M. and Lisa S. Lafferty APN: 254- 102 -26 Site Address: 1456 Sanford Lane, Encinitas CA 92024 -1501 Mailing Address: 1456 Sanford Lane, Encinitas CA 92024-1501 (DJO):djo DA5714211TRS%PERMISSI0N2.wpd S13&0 Job No. 57142.22 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (—D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T O -:M !o ATTENTION: 71);iW4 kZ6JK�Gc 04 - Wj - p tAo DATE: Regarding (Finance Number (all< DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check Checkprmt / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Interoffice Memorandum' ❑ Plancheck Comments• ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ ement re: Our conversation ❑ Covenant re: Our Inquiry ❑ Highway Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: �%= Copies to: ewr= 1-1 Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ n Improvement Plan ❑ Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original/Rejected _Check Plancheck Comments' ❑ Grading Plan �-, I�� r� UCheck ` Checkprint/Approved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments• ❑ TP `Mrr�M/M�UP/MIN/DR: �__ sk) . AZE ,W� „ APN: Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff / Consul tant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD /LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (PublicIPrivate) (Road/Drainage/ W ater /Sewer/Trai VPark/Fac i l ity) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Hydrology Study/Map ❑ Cross Sections [J Exhibit: ❑ (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction ❑ Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return 2p&nuC ",C577 Please call: L1;3 , if necessary Originator: 06peftaf— �[�avy� �%= Copies to: ewr= Messenger ❑ Received by:4 A Title: V Location: Other ❑ Date: / b ' elephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -28181 TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISGIARWGencric Trans doG02 11.99 1 of I y- 'v,rd INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Copilot Improvement Projec District Support Servic, Field Operatic, Subdivision Engineedn Trotfic Engineedn T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ❑ Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ Q District Support Services (D) ❑ Office of the Director (NI) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: Regarding (Finance Number -__L) DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number _� DEPOSITTEE Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TMITPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies ofall documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter" ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments 0 Agreement re: El Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ DATE: 1, - TPhVrM1MUP/MIN/nR;.-, lyC APN: Comments/Additional Space for Document 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other r ❑ 6) Copies to: Additional Notes: • ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/T /CATV) Sketch (if needed) / Description: Improvement Plan ❑ SubmittabPlan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage / Water /Sewer/Trail/Park/Facility) A - -.r;Le Grading Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -built Proposed n Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc • ❑ Blueline/Red -lined Q Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Requirements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Re�vieww [3 Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Inua Transdad02.It 99 1 of 1 EI4v/NEERING SERVICES DEPARTMr�,-IT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services ( _D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) g Field Operations (FO) ❑ O ATTENTION: CJ II-L- l�Jl�F'dJ DATE: i Regarding (Finance Number Z - (gr- ) DEPOSIT/FEE TPMlI"M/MUP /MIN /DR: - (Finance Number - DEPOSIT/FEE 11 " (Finance Number - DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Interoffice Memorandum* ❑ Plancheck Comments" ❑ Comments/Additional Space for Document: 1 i O A to. Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ E TOLD 91.6% Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ ! ( Staff / Consultant /CD/F re/SDWD /OMWD /LCWD) Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Sketch (if needed): Agreement re: n Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ (1 6'n,�(� CLk1x" C-0-b Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments" ❑ (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/ Water /Sewer/Trail/Park/Faci I ity) Intermediate Description: -- - - - -------- ---------- ---- - --------------- - - -- radix la ❑ 1-0-? Check Plan Change Description: Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments• ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Hydrology Study/Map ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction ❑ Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information E] Uses ❑ Please return Please call: - if necessary Originator: ," a ! if "n"Vmir �- Copies to: rte V Messenger ❑ Mail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ Received by: Date: L A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633 - 2770 /FAX (760) 633 -281x r 1 8 �/ T�DD (760) 633 -2700 1SGIARR/Gencric_Trans. doc /02 11.99 l� -16 I WV Q 1 1 or I