Loading...
1999-6038 GPARCEL NO. JOB SITE ADDRESS: APPLICANT NAME MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: CARLSBAD C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S E' NEERING SERVICES DEPARTM' 505 VULCAN AVE. ENCINI TAS, CA 9202022 4 � 1I GRADING PERMIT 254- 611 -070 O19/10 MESA NORTH LOWER PERMIT NO.: 6038GI PLAN NO.: 6038 -G BARRATT AMERICAN INC. 2035 CORTE DEL NOGAL #160 PHONE NO.: 760 - 431 -0800 STATE: CA ZIP: 92009- CONTRACTOR : BARRATT AMERICAN INC. LICENSE NO.: 407512 ENGINEER : HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO INC. PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 8/16/00 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 8/16/01 PERMIT ISSUED BY INSPECTOR:- GARtA-''KAT -- '�-- hI�E J PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 6,575.00 2. INSPECTION FEE 16,730.00 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 ------------------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION PHONE NO.: 760- 431 -0800 LICENSE TYPE: B PH N .: 858 -558 -4500 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 491,008.00 Co. Fi-000 CarxTRDI^ FEZ: &1 158,Do tP. jXFWq?ED Hat4oHta4 -M : 1i , Do 0, co OF WORK ------------------------- - - - - -- .ARTHWORK /SITE RETAINING WALLS /STORM DRAINAGE / COMMON ACCESS /EROSION CONTROL FOR 98 -171 TM, 17 SFD /1PVT RD /l OS, ALL LOTS. DIRT: 60KCY CUT/ FILL. WALL: 7805F CMU. DN: 1 „356LF.DITCH /10LF SPLASH /15 EA OUTLET /179LF PIPE /lEA CO /lEA INLET /lEA HEAD /5CY RIP- RAI.'WY: 29,325SF AC /PCC. LETTER DATED JUL 07 2000 APPLIES. AS- BUILTS /SETTiRd bF DEF''D MONUMENTS REQ'D. . I . - - -- INSPECTION --------- - - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION ,,...O�..Ti'- COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED X ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED X ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION --- ---------------- -- - --- ----------------------------------------------------- I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE TH T I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT A D AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATI G AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUAN TO THIS APPLIC ATIO19 I A PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: ER 2. AGENT 3. 8 o DATE 'SIGNIED TELEPHONE NUMBER C T Y O F E N C I N I T I E NEERING SERVICES DEPARTML 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 6038Cft PARCEL ,NO. : 254 - 611 -0100 PLAN NO.: 6038 -G JOB SITE ADDRESS: 1428 LAUREN CT. APPLICANT NAME BARRETT AMERICAN INC. MAILING ADDRESS: 2035 CORTE DEL NOGAL STE 160 PHONE NO.: 700- 431 -Q6GC CITY: CARLSBAD STATE: CA ZIP: 92009- CONTRACTOR : BARR.ETT AMERICAN INC. PHONE NO.: 7'J -43; -Obi• LICENSE NO.: 407512 LICENSE TYPE: B INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: EVANSTON INSURANCE CO. POLICY NO. : OOGLP1003282 POLICY E::P. FjTE: Sri °,i0? ENGINEEP. : H CIATES Np,; PERMIT I DATE: 6/13/01 PERMI XP. DATE: 3/1.5/02 PERMIT ISSUED BY: INSP CTOR: MIKE 'ALLES -- - - --- -- - - -- -- PERMIT FEES b DEPOSITS ------------------------- 1. ?ERMIT FEE 150.00 2. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 3. SECURITY DEPOSIT .00 --•--------------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ---- -------- ------- -------- - - - --- CONSTRUCTION PERMIT TO INSTALL ?CC DRIVEWAY APPROACH ON LAUREN CT TO MATCH STAMPED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. - - -- INSPECTION ----- -- --- - - - - -- DATE --- - - - --- INSPECTOR'S SIGNL.TURE INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION - J2--Q5 -o z __ � . aga — - - -- I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO FEREBY CEFTTTry UN7EP PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. I1 I � 40 IGNATURE I I ANT NAME - *760- gaz- 1�6C( !�•i3 0/ DATE SIGNED 7vv 421 o ?=n - -- TELEPHONE NUMBER CIRCLE ONE:, 1.)OWNER 2. AGENT 3. OTHER_ CITY OF ENCINITAS *** CUSTOMER RECEIPT *** BATCH I0: CASHIER 7/17/00 33 RECEIPT : 000324. DESCRIPTION QTY AMOUNT PAYMENT DESC PT SV 1 816730.00 * GRADING INSPECTS GI BARRATT AMERICAN INCORP ENGINEERING / GRADING I 10100003450800 1 879444.00 * SECURITY /ENGINEE SY DEPOSITS / SECURITY DEP 10100002180000 GRADING INSPEC 6038GI 16730 AND SECURITY DEP 6038GI 79.944 TOTAL 896674.00 Tender Details CW 165036 816730.00 CK /: 165034 $79944.00 Amount Tendered $96674.00 DATE: 7117100 TIME: 11:04:40 CITY OF ENCINITAS . ** CUSTOMER RECEIPT "* BATCH ID: CASHIER 7/17/00 33 RECEIPT : 0003246 [r 46iO. "I 126(S LI!U Ya9_17:':17i�EPf- °.�9t.1, 1 86158.00 FLOOD 8 DRAINAGE FL. CK BARRATT AMERICAN INCORP BUILDING / MITIGATION F 23200003433000 FLOOD CONTROL FEES TOTAL CHECK 86158.00 Tender Details c"; 165035 86158.00 DATE: 7/17/00 TIME: 11:06:13 o rke� BONG NUMBER: 111 3351 2506 PREMIUM: $ 2, 0 5 5.00 .UL (Z 20 FOR: Improvements (Public road, Drainage, and E - Trail Improvements) GRADING IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENT FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND WHEREAS, the City of Encinitas (hereinafter referred to as City) and Barratt American Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, (hereinafter referred to as Owner) have entered into the attached agreement hereby Owner agrees to perform certain designated public improvements in connection with the approval of the subdivision T.M. 98-171 ( "MESA NORTH LOWER") which said agreement, identified as Covenant Regarding Real Property (hereinafter referred to as Covenant) is hereby incorporated into this surety bond by reference) and WHEREAS, Owner is required under the terms of the Covenant to furnish security in accordance with Section 66499 of the Subdivision Map Act NOW THEREFORE, We, Owner, and the American Insurance Company, organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and authorized to act as surety in the State of California, as surety, are held and firmly bound until the City in the penal sum of FOUR HUNDRED ELEVEN THOUSAND SIXTY -FOUR 6 NO /100-------------------- --- - -- ($411,064.00 lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, finely by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded owner, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the Covenant and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Encinitas, its officers, agents and employees of each, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect, subject to the following; 1. As the work required under the covenant proceeds, Owner may submit written requests to the city Engineer of the city (hereinafter referred to as Director) for a reduction in the penal amount of this surety bond. If the director is satisfied that the amount of the surety bond may be reduced, then, upon inspecting the work performed and verifying the percentage and value of the work remaining to be completed, the Director may authorize the reduction, subject to the restrictions in the covenant. aD N0. 11L 3951 2056 When the Director approves a reduction in the surety bond, he shall notify Owner in writing of the acceptable amount of reduction. When substitute security in the reduced amount has been approved by the legal counsel for the city, the city clerk is authorized to return the original security to the surety. 2. In the event that performance is not completed within the time period specified in the Covenant, or within any time extension granted pursuant to the terms of the Covenant, then, upon receipt of notification and demand by the director, the surety may promptly remedy the default, or shall promptly: a. Complete the Covenant in accordance with its terms and condition, or b. Pay such portion of the proceeds of the surety bond to the City as is necessary to complete the required performance and to reimburse City for reasonable costs incident thereto. Any proceeds of the surety bond remaining after completion of performance and reimbursement of actual City costs shall be refunded to the surety. 3. In the event that the performance required under covenant is completed and accepted by the City of Encinitas, Owner is entitled to a 75% reduction in the penal amount of the original surety bond. Security for the remaining 25°% of the original surety bond shall continue in effect for one year following completion and acceptance of the required performance in order to secure the warranty. 4. a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as cost and included in any judgment rendered. 5. Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Covenant or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect the obligations under this surety bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the covenant or to the work or to the specifications. 6. Surety hereby agrees to bind itself to, and to perform in strict accordance with, the provisions of this surety bond and the provisions of the covenant which pertain to security and security obligations. 7. The parties acknowledge that the Covenant is appended to this surety bond. J NO. 111 3351 2506 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by Owner and Surety above names, on JULY 11 . 2000. BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED a_ Delaware Corporation Principal Stephen R. Reid, Senior Vice President THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Surety Attomey -in -Fact TODD M. ROHM Note: (1) Acknowledgements of executon by Principal and Surety must be attached CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORIA ] ] ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ] On July 12, 2000, before me, Latonia M. West , Notary Public, personally appeared Stephen R. Reid personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. LATONIA M. WEST, Notary Public LATONIA M. WEST I COMM. #1252915 NOTARY PUELIC- CALIFORNIA N (yj �� SAN DIEGO COUNTY 0 My Commission Expires FEBRUARY 7.2004 w+�.� � ■ ww�w TIIIS AREA FOR OFFICIAL NOTARIAL SEAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIN ED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT R INDIVIDUAL Grading/Improvement Performance Bond X CORPORATE OFFICER T.M. 98 -171 SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT Mesa North Lower (Quail II) Bond No. 111 3351 2506 TITLE TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT PARTNERS LIMITED 8 GENERAL ATTORNEY -IN -FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY) Barran American Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation 3 NUMBER OF PAGES June 16, 2000 DATE OF DOCUMENT CALIFORNIA ALL- PURPOS State of CALIFORNIA ORANGE County of On 7/11/00 Dale personally appeared CKNOWLEDGMENT before me, D.J. PICARD, NOTARY PUBLIC Name .,a ride Of onc., (, q., •.1„ta Dae, Nelay Py61c7 , TODD M. ROHM Name(:) of %XXpersonally known to me – OR – E] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person$3 whose nameOG) is/aM subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heRZIRMitgC executed the same in hisf eft) & authorized capacityM, and that by his/!f@[Ct[= signature(9Q on the instrument the person(M), J. PICARD or the entity upon behalf of which the person%) acted, COMM. #1182404 c executed the instrument. NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA / ORANGE COUNTY a� My Comm. Expires May 22, 2002 WITNESS my nano and ofti 'al seal. t 1 'igrul e OF Notary P%hk OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and cou:C Pr vent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: 7/11/00 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: TODD M. ROHM BOND ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner —❑ Limited ❑ General X3 Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing: THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Number of Pages: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual - El Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — []Limited O Attorney -in -Fact ❑ General ❑ Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGHT THUMBPRINT] OFSIGNER O 1991 Nalianal Naary Assoculun • 9236 Rem t Ave., P.O. Do. )184 • Canga Pae CA 9 1 9 0 911 81 N, No 5907 Rcv , Call TO Fm, 1 800 81668» FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY P MERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation, THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation redomesticated in Nebraska, ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION, a California corporation, and AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, (herein collectively called "the Companies") does each hereby appoint Todd M. Rohm, D. J. Picard, Cathy S. Kennedy, Beata A. Sensi or Sejal Patel of Orange, CA their true and lawful Attorney(s) -in -Fact, with full power of authority hereby conferred in their name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other written obligations in the nature thereof ----------- and to bind the Companies thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the corporate seals of the Companies and duly attested by the Companies' Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Attomey(s) -in -Fact may do in the premises. This power of attorney is granted under and by the authority of Article VII of the By -laws of each of the Companies which provisions are now in full force and effect. This power of attorney is signed and sealed under the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of each of the Companies at a meeting duly called and held, or by written consent, on the 19th day of March, 1995, and said Resolution has not been amended or repealed: "RESOLVED, that the signature of any Vice - President, Assistant Secretary, and Resident Assistant Secretary of the Companies, and the seal of the Companies may be affixed or printed on any power of attorney, on any revocation of any power of attorney, or on any certificate relating thereto, by facsimile, and any power of attorney, any revocation of any power of attorney, or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Companies." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused these presents to be signed by their Vice- President, and their corporate seals to be hereunto affixed this 1st day of May 1 2000 C ape „p '^ice co+ �+ I sew L;6i i r e.os •� ♦ e� u w STATE OF CALIFORNIA l SS. COUNTY OF MARIN J FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION AMERIC AUTOMO�JBILE INSURANCE COMPANY �/ Fit Gc By We- President On this 1st day of May . 2000 ,before me personally came Donn R. Kolbeck to me known, who, being by me duly swom, did depose and say: that he is aVice- President of each company, described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seals of the said Companies; that the seals affixed to the said instrument are such company seals; that they were so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said companies and that he signed his name thereto by like order. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year herein first above written i OWCOL OCAMPO Commission B 1163726 MM. Notary Public - Califomia Main County STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS. No Public COUNTY OF MARIN 1 I, the undersigned, Resident Assistant Secretary of each company, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore that Article VII of the By -laws of each company, and the Resolution of the Board of Directors; set forth in the Power of Attorney, are now in force. Signed and sealed at the County of Marin. Dated the 11TH day of JULY 2000 p V OY4 - r 1. Ir a 'CYAN f G� +`i'•�ii fi�4 ,o+Oy�E�ykky4< j e e n e.6 -= „t Rcsidwt Assrstant Sca<_1y JUL 1 2 2WO ENGINIEIIIN�� ',-HVICES CI rV Q� LNCINITAS BOND NUMBER: 111 3351 2514 PREMIUM: $100.00 FOR: Monumentation IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENT FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND WHEREAS, the City of Encinitas (hereinafter referred to as City) and Barrett American Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, (hereinafter referred to as Owner) have entered into the attached agreement hereby Owner agrees to perform certain designated public improvements in connection with the approval of the subdivision T.M. 9 s -1 7 1 ( "MESA NORTH LOWER ) which said agreement, identified as Covenant Regarding Real Property (hereinafter referred to as Covenant) Is hereby incorporated into this surety bond by reference) and WHEREAS, Owner is required under the terms of the Covenant to furnish security in accordance with Section 66499 of the Subdivision Map Act. NOW THEREFORE, We, Owner, and the American insurance Company, organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, aril authorized to act as surety in the State of Califomla, as surety, are held and firmly bound until the City in the penal sum of FOUR THOUSAND & NO/ 100---------------- - - - - -- ($ 4, 0oo, oo) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which stun well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these Presents. The condition of this obligation Is such that if the above bounded owner, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall In all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions In the Covenant and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Encinitas, its officers, agents and employees of each, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect, subJect to the following; 1. As the work required under the covenant proceeds, Owner may submit written requests to the city Engineer of the city (hereinafter referred to as Director) for a reduction in the penal amount of this surety bond. If the director Is satisfied that the amount of the surety bond may be reduced, then, upon inspecting the work performed and verifying the percentage and value of the work remaining to be completed, the Director may authorize the reduction, subject to the restrictions in the covenant. BOND NO. 111 3351 2514 When the Director approves a reduction in the surety bond, he shall notify Owner in writing of the acceptable amount of reduction. When substitute security in the reduced amount has been approved by the legal counsel for the city, the city clerk is authorized to return the original security to the surety. 2. In the event that performance is not completed within the time period specified in the Covenant, or within any time extension granted pursuant to the terms of the Covenant, then, upon receipt of notification and demand by the director, the surety may promptly remedy the default, or shall promptly. a. Complete the Covenant in accordance with its terms and condition, or b. Pay such portion of the proceeds of the surety bond to the City as is necessary to complete the required performance and to reimburse City for reasonable costs incident thereto. Any proceeds of the surety bond remaining after completion of performance and reimbursement of actual City costs shall be refunded to the surety. 3. In the event that the performance required under covenant is completed and accepted by the City of Encinitas, Owner is entitled to a 75% reduction in the penal amount of the original surety bond. Security for the remaining 25% of the original surety bond shall continue in effect for one year following completion and acceptance of the required performance in order to secure the warranty. 4. a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, ail to be taxed as cost and included in any judgment rendered_ 5. Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Covenant or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect the obligations under this surety bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the covenant or to the work or to the specifications. 6. Surety hereby agrees to bind itself to, and to perform in strict accordance with, the provisions of this surety bond and the provisions of the covenant which pertain to security and security obligations. 7_ The parties acknowledge that the Covenant is appended to this surety bond. BOND NO. 111 3351 2514 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by Owner and Surety above names, on JULY 11 1 2000. BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED a Delaware Corporation Principal THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Surety ident Attorney -in -Fact TODD M. ROHM Note: (1) Ac{mo'Medgements of execution by Principal and Surety must be attached CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORIA I I ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO I On July 12, 2000, before me, Latonia M. West , Notary Public, personally appeared Stephen R. Reid personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. LATONIAM. WEST, Notary Public THIS AREA FOR OFFICIAL NOTARIAL SEAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER F INDIVIDUAL X CORPORATE OFFICER SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT TITLE DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Monumentation Performance Bond T.M. 98 -171 _Mesa North Lower (Quail IT) Bond No. 1113351 2514 TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ❑ PARTNERS LIlvIITED B GENERAL ATORNEY•IN -FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY) Barratt American Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation 3 NUMBER OF PAGES June 16, 2000 DATE OF DOCUMENT = LATONIA M. WEST COMM. #1252915 n - "" NOTARY PUBLIC- CALIFORNIA rn SAN DIEGO COUNTY My Commission Expires FEBRUARY 7, 2004 THIS AREA FOR OFFICIAL NOTARIAL SEAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER F INDIVIDUAL X CORPORATE OFFICER SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT TITLE DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Monumentation Performance Bond T.M. 98 -171 _Mesa North Lower (Quail IT) Bond No. 1113351 2514 TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ❑ PARTNERS LIlvIITED B GENERAL ATORNEY•IN -FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY) Barratt American Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation 3 NUMBER OF PAGES June 16, 2000 DATE OF DOCUMENT CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOS CKNOWLEDGMENT State of CALIFORNIA ORANGE County of On 7/11/00 Doe personally appeared before me, D • J TODD M. ROHM PICARD, NOTARY PUBLIC Name aM Tak d OIRCw la 9., -Jan 0- N-,y PWIC -J M%Mpersonally known to me – OR – ❑ proved to me on the basis of salisfactwy evidence to be the personl3 whose nameos) is/M* subs,+ bed fn the within instrument and acknowledged to me that hed622M9[executed the same in hisli>Bx' bM authorized capacity M, and that by his/KKA tM signalure(9Q on the instrument the person(S), =NOTARY ARD y or the entity upon behalf of which the person%) acted, 82404 c executed the instrument. 0Q. CALIrORNIA UNTY May 2z, 2002 WITNESS my hand and official se S, d Ndary OPTIONAL Rough the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: BOND 7/11/00 Document Date: Number of Pages: 3 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: TODD M. ROHM ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited bS Attomey -in -Fact ❑ General ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY RIGHT THUMBPRINT OFSIGNER Signer's Name: El El ❑ Individual - Corporate Officer Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Attorney -in -Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGNTTHUMSPRINT OFSIGNER I—, F"W W 5907 Fkro CaITW.Fme 1200276La 7 FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANI NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation, THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation redomesticated in Nebraska, ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION, a California corporation, and AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, (herein collectively called "the Companies ") does each hereby appoint Todd M. Rohm, D. J. Picard, Cathy S. Kennedy, Beata A. Sensi or Sejal Patel of Orange, CA their true and lawful Anorney(s) -in -Fact, with full power of authority hereby conferred in their name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other written obligations in the nature thereof ----------- and to bind the Companies thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the corporate scab of the Companies and duly attested by the Companies' Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Attorney(s) -in -Fact may do in the premises. This power of attorney is granted under and by the authority of Article VII of the By -laws of each of the Companies which provisions are now in full force and effect. This power of attorney is signed and sealed under the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of each of the Companies at a meeting duly called and held, or by written consent, on the 19th day of March, 1995, and said Resolution has not been amended or repealed: "RESOLVED, that the signature of any Vice - President, Assistant Secretary, and Resident Assistant Secretary of the Companies, and the seal of the Companies may be affixed or printed on any power of attorney, on any revocation of any power of attorney, or on any certificate relating thereto, by facsimile, and any power of attorney, any revocation of any power of attorney, or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Companies." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused these presents to be signed by their Vice- President, and their corporate seals to be hereunto affixed this 1st day of May 1 2000 TY eN'S EY[II ,.•,w�n•e•yrr.t LE ♦ ! 4 • • - a� rtnOrolTY ��^ 'L a 66w LS' STATE OF CALIFORNIA l SS. COUNTY OF MARIN f FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION AMERIC AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY By I l►�t t Gi Vice-President On this 1st day of May , 2000 , before me personally came Donn R. Kolbeck to me known, who, being by me duly swom, did depose and say: that he is a Vice- President of each company, described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seals of the said Companies; that the seals affixed to the said instrument are such company seals; that they were so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said companies and that he signed his name thereto by like order. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year herein first above written L OCAMPO 9-ftwComm. Commission # 1163726 � Notary Public - California � Mann County No Public STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 SS. COUNTY OF MARIN J L the undersigned, Resident Assistant Secretary of each company, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore that Article VII of the By -laws of each company, and the Resolution of the Board of Directors; set forth in the Power of Attorney, are now in force. Signed and sealed at the County of Mann. Dated the 11TH day of JULY 2000 Y ',IrI kS, .Nf .YGj4 `? 5ert]YO D S igieCA LB= Resident Assisunt SeaeLVy C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A ,S INEERING SERVICES DEPART' 505 S, VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS. CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PARCEL NO. : 254- 611 - 0700/0'910 JOB SITE ADDRESS: MESA NORTH LOWER APPLICANT NAME BARRATT AMERICAN INC. MAILING ADDRESS: 2035 CORTE DEL NOGAL #160 CITY: CARLSBAD STATE: CA ZIP CONTRACTOR : BARRATT AMERICAN INC. LICENSE NO.: 407512 ENGINEER : HUNSAKER 5 ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO INC. PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 8/16/00 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 8 /16/01 PERMIT ISSUED BY INSPECTOR:�Y '-:- Hl ICE JALL� --------------- - - - - -- - -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS PERMIT NO.: 6038GI PLAN NO.: 6038 -G PHONE NO.: 760- 431 -0800 92009- PHONE NO.: 760- 431 -0800 LICENSE TYPE: B PH N 858 -558 -4500 : il - ---------------- --- -- - - - - -- 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 6,575.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 2. INSPECTION FEE 16,730.00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 491,008.00 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 (o. Ft-000 coo-TTp.&L. FEf (y) 11;8. co 7. DEAD H0?l0Hfn4_M : Ai, 000.00 ------------- ------ - - - --- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------------------- EARTHWORK /SITE RETAINING WALLS /STORM DRAINAGE /COMMON ACCESS /EROSION CONTROL FOR 98 -171 TM, 17 SFD /1PVT RD /1 OS, ALL LOTS. DIRT: 60KCY CUT/ FILL. WALL: 780SF CMU. DN: 1,356LF DITCH /10LF SPLASH /15 EA OUTLET /179LF PIPE /lEA CO /lEA INLET /lEA HEAD /5CY RIP -RAP. WY: 29,325SF AC /PCC. LETTER DATED JUL 07 2000 APPLIES. AS- BUILTS /SETTING OF DEF'D MONUMENTS REQ'D. - - -- INSPECTION ------- --- ------ DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. I A PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: E�jjjR 2. AGENT 3. 8 /CC> DATE IGN D TELEPHONE NUMBER /i B A R R A T T December 14, 2000 Dave Viera City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 RE: Quail Ridge, TM 98 -171 Lots 6 an 15 Dear Dave: Barratt American would like to request foundation releases on lots 6 and 15. 1 have enclosed for your use the pad certification letter for lots 6 and 15 and the As- Graded Geotechnical Report on North Mesa - Lower. Please feel free to contact me if you need any further information. Thank you in advance for your attention to this request. Sincerely, BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED / 4 4 Daniel R. Sanchez General Offsite Construction Manager P 1PbmeCoeesponCenceWichaN Saech AQ.ail - Dave Viera (Stab release(. dm Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte Del Nogal, Suite 160, Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 431 -0800 Contractor's License No. 407512 T Y O F E N C I N I T S ZNEERING SERVICES DEPARTI 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 6038GI PARCEL NO. : 254- 611- 07OOq /1O PLAN NO.: 6038 -G JOB SITE ADDRESS: SA NORTH LOWER APPLICANT NAME BARRATT AMERICAN INC. MAILING ADDRESS: 2035 CORTE DEL NOGAL #160 PHONE NO.: 760- 431 -0800 CITY: CARLSBAD STATE: CA ZIP: 92009- CONTRACTOR : LICENSE NO.: ENGINEER PERMIT ISSUE PERMIT EXP. INSPECTOR: C, BARRATT AMERICAN INC. 407512 HUNSAKER S ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO INC. DATE: 8/16/00 DATE: 8/16/01 PERMIT ISSUED BY kRLA KAY ------------------- - - - - -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS PHONE NO.: 760-431 -0800 LICENSE TYPE: B PH N 858- 558 -4500 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 6,575.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 2. INSPECTION FEE 16,730.00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 491,008.00 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 Co. FLcoo0 C-0rtT'gpV FFZ : (101 19;8. 00 �. ,DEF R4MD HaP40HOMTS : A{ , 000. QD ----------- -- ------ - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------------------- EARTHWORK /SITE RETAINING WALLS /STORM DRAINAGE /COMMON ACCESS /EROSION CONTROL FOR 98 -171 TM, 17 SFD /1PVT RD /1 OS, ALL LOTS. DIRT: 60KCY CUT/ FILL. WALL: 780SF CMU. DN: 1,356LF DITCH /10LF SPLASH /15 EA OUTLET /179LF PIPE /lEA CO /lEA INLET /lEA HEAD /5CY RIP -RAP. WY: 29,325SF AC /PCC. LETTER DATED JUL 07 2000 APPLIES. AS- BUILTS /SETTING OF DEF'D MONUMENTS REQ'D. - - -- INSPECTION ----- ----- --- --- DATE -- - -- - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. I A PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: ER 2. AGENT 3. OTHE 8 /oo DATE 'EIGNIED TELEPHONE NUMBER FINAL SUBDIVISON CHECKLIST Map: TM qB -111 Developer: wES( of GyatE `. g�5!t/✓B Location: C.YUAILl �.1• . MG,-SA, Item By Public Works Conditions of Approval Other Department Sign -offs Community Development Community Services — It PML Fire D. ► loD?E Building Sewer District Water District California Coastal Permit or Waiver NAB03 TjF_r aND!Sh- Subdivision Map Certified Improvement Plan Signed Grading Plan Signed Approved Cost Estimate (ACE) Improvement Covenant Executed Grading Covenant Executed Securities Posted Amount: $ Type: Amount: $ Type: Amount: $ Type: Processing Deposits Up to Date Subdivision Guarantee fizowTAvAM. Tax Certificate FµdrQX"l &%a original Map Mylars (signed with permanent ink) Agenda Report to CAB /Planning Commission After approval by CAB or Planning Commission: Approval by CAB or PC Mylars Signed and Released after 15 day Appeal Period m11039 Date Complete Otdl.i NiZ oa MA�s 1 FoZ P,§►K -S SECURITY / at7 1 � � Dear Mr- Hefner: ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA LOWER LOTS 1-16. CONTROL NUMBER RW 1071 The above referenced project has been received and reviewed by this Department. The purpose of the review was to determine conformance with all rules and regulations and good public health engineering as related to reclaimed water irrigation systems. please make the following corrections on the plans: 1. Add Control Number, RW 1071, in one -inch letters, vertically on the upper right hand comer of the Title Sheet. on the title sheet_ 2. Provide an engineer /architect's Stamp current mai nland signed plans 3. Show the location of the potable water main line and the recycled to lots eter on the mgation plans. 4. Show the recycled water main line and the lateral to the recy 5. Show a detail of the DO NOT DRINK sign. 6. Show a detail of the quick coupler valve, and state on the detail that "quick coupler valves shall be of a type approved for recycled water use." 7. Provide a different symbol for the potable water meter in the legend and on the irrigation plans, appears to be the same as recycled water meter• 8. indicate "recycled irrigation" in the project name. 7. This original correction letter should be included with notes on how corrections were accomplished when re- submitting plans for approval approval of the plans t of Environmental Health coven the Please note that review and appro P � Pam of the plans. irrigation portion of the plans only and does not include any 1 Should you have any questions, please contact me at (858) 694 -2548. Very truly yours. � 7� —><-� RICHARD CARLSO Environmental Health Specialist III Cross - Connection Control/Water Reclamation Pcaatt' Fax Note 7671 °°' -11 aka COUNTY m gbdj c,_oir�- ''°" GARY ERBECtt Department �.� ot.* -r�r oa. ri,a. • prRECTOR Land and 5201 F• P °" ' �� 9s — N2r% Fa. Sane ta5al5a5- August 11, 2000 Kipp Hefner, Engineering Services Department City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas CA 92024 Dear Mr- Hefner: ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA LOWER LOTS 1-16. CONTROL NUMBER RW 1071 The above referenced project has been received and reviewed by this Department. The purpose of the review was to determine conformance with all rules and regulations and good public health engineering as related to reclaimed water irrigation systems. please make the following corrections on the plans: 1. Add Control Number, RW 1071, in one -inch letters, vertically on the upper right hand comer of the Title Sheet. on the title sheet_ 2. Provide an engineer /architect's Stamp current mai nland signed plans 3. Show the location of the potable water main line and the recycled to lots eter on the mgation plans. 4. Show the recycled water main line and the lateral to the recy 5. Show a detail of the DO NOT DRINK sign. 6. Show a detail of the quick coupler valve, and state on the detail that "quick coupler valves shall be of a type approved for recycled water use." 7. Provide a different symbol for the potable water meter in the legend and on the irrigation plans, appears to be the same as recycled water meter• 8. indicate "recycled irrigation" in the project name. 7. This original correction letter should be included with notes on how corrections were accomplished when re- submitting plans for approval approval of the plans t of Environmental Health coven the Please note that review and appro P � Pam of the plans. irrigation portion of the plans only and does not include any 1 Should you have any questions, please contact me at (858) 694 -2548. Very truly yours. � 7� —><-� RICHARD CARLSO Environmental Health Specialist III Cross - Connection Control/Water Reclamation �yr�- �•»a.�yutrr_F MEMORANDUM TM 98 -171 DATE: 8/16/2000 TO: Director, Engineering Services Department FROM: �. CDITDhi Community Services Department SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval 254-611-07,09,10 (A. P. N.) West side of Quail Gardens Drive. between Swallowtail Rd. and Leucadia Blvd. (Address) Barratt American Inc. (Subdivider) Please be advised that the Community Services Department conditions of Approval for Recordation of a Final Map for Case No. TM 98 -171 required by Resolution No. PC -99 -07 have been satisfied. This tentative map expires on 1128102 THIS MEMORANDUM MUST BE PROCESSED BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AND RETURNED TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. n & -li-vD Signature Date BPmemo.doc 08/16/00 q CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMORANDUM TM 98 -171 DATE: 7/19/99 TO: Director, Engineering Services Department / FROM: bAUID / I I STD /2,� Encinitas Fire Department SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval 254 - 611 -07, 09, & 10 (A. P. N.) West side of Quail Gardens Drive, between Swallowtail Rd. and Leucadia Blvd. (Address) &Aw11T7 (Subdivider) Please be advised that the Encinitas Fire Department conditions of Approval for Recordation of a Final Map for Case No. TM 98 -171 as required by Resolution No. PC 99- 07 have been satisfied. This tentative map expires on 01 -28 -2002. THIS MEMORANDUM MUST BE PROCESSED BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AND RETURNED TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. Signature Date BPmemo.doc Prot.,., l n...r r Pl.,m July 18, 2000 City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Engineering, Planning, Environmental Sciences and Management Services Corporate Office: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 760.942.5147 Fax 760.632.0164 TAM AYl I9 2651.47 Fort Yodre Ir(�crt,.,eilor.) Re. Omission Letter for North Mesa Lower, TM 98 -171 To Whom It May Concern: ooA5) H This letter is to confirm that the Leucadia County Water District (LCWD or District) maintains an easement within the above referenced project, as indicated on Document No. 2000 -0363357 of Official Records of the San Diego County Recorder's Office, Recorded July 11, 2000. Pursuant to Section 66436, Subsection A -3 and A -1 may be omitted from the title sheet of the final map. final map without District signature. of the Subdivision Map Act, the signature of LCWD The District does not object to the recordation of the Any additional easements required by the District shall be granted by separate document prior to the Approval of any improvement drawings, or issuance of sewer permits. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Dudek & Associates, Inc. -A Steve Deering, PE � LCWD District Engineer CC. Frank Reynaga, Leucadia County Water District Dave Viera, Hunsaker & Associates, Inc. JUL 12.'00 29:29RM CITY r - - NCINITPS F.1 /2 crq, Encinitas Fire Department Fire Administration./ Fire Prevention / Marine Safety 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 Facsimile Cover Sheet DATE: cro SEND TO FAX COMPANY:_ r� Jz TOTAL PAGES: FROM' �!«. 1 V�YJlC7 PHONE:-7lS-lama f Call ASAP Review & Ca D Review & Return 0 Please Handle Per Our.Conversaton FYI Please Reply By COMMENTS: c.x,a. .• nu nxiu�.inlC7 >L 'e0 e9 2 9 PM CITY ENCINI NCINITP4 JUL 12 HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES S A N D I{ G O, 1 N C. N.LNNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING IRVINE RIVfUjC)E April 27, 2000 SAN DIECO C� tlJU JDO 40M P•1i -71/y[ M Jr of Garami .ac++ City of Encinitas Engineering Department .Jv' 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 G A" Re: Street Names for North Mesa — Lower TM 98 -171 Y' Dear Jeff: le ` 'O'pe t3o o6,LF�.a�'J We would like to submit for your approval the following street name and two alternates: � tT'� Lauren Court Alternates: Nicholas Court Ptxor3 ��,s , Sophie Court Please advise at your rifest convenience the approved street name. Sincerely, "'�, Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. Diane Ingram Engineering Department DAVE , LS lJ `5 C U ► '� ` 5V LEX waUN,AN i •� ) I' �RLp NC N1j p5 NSw VIAUwNDO L { 19111 °� i~ C, f1� 10179 MuennekenlSL SIn Di.ga,u 92121 (ES■) 13"00 PN (33!)138.1414 rx r^.�.hunaM.wm =AL P.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects City of District Support Services Ei� Field Operations Sand ReplenishmenilStormwaterCompliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering July 7, 2000 attn: Patricia L. Bevil Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Tentative Map 98- 171 "Mesa North Lower" {Major subdivision of 17 SFD /1 PVT RD /1 OS lots, 1400blk Quail Gardens Dr) Grading Application 6038GR )Rough Grading /Erosion Control /Private Road] A.P.N. 254-611-(07,09,10) Permit issuance requirements This correspondence briefly summarizes the Engineering Permit process. The fourth review of proposed Drawing 6038 -G and the Final Map has since been completed and returned to the Engineer of Work, Hunsaker & Associates, San Diego, Inc., for correction. Upon resubmittal and subject to additional review to verify completeness, the Drawing and Map will be forwarded to the Director of Engineering Services for approval, which will be valid for three years. In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per the Drawing you will need to satisfy the following requirements: (1) Ensure that the proposed Final Map is technically correct. (2) Obtain all plan approvals then provide 4 blueline copies of the approved Drawing, which should include the Planting and Irrigation Plans. (3) Post Security Deposits as follows: (a)GRADING PERMIT... in the amount of $491.008.00 to guarantee performance of earthwork, site retaining walls, private road and drainage improvements, and erosion control, and MDEFERRED MONUMENTS... in the amount of $4.000.00 to guarantee deferred monuments' performance and payment. Of the amount in 3(a), $411,064.00, and of the amount in 3(b), 100 %, may be in the form of a Performance Bond, and, in the case of deferred monuments, a Labor and Materials Bond, issued by a State of California licensed surety company. The balance of the amount in 3(a), $79,944.00, has to be in the form of cash, certificates of deposit, a letter of credit, or an assignment of account, any of which may be used for the full amount. Any financial instrument's format is subject to approval. (4) Pay a non - refundable Inspection Fee of $16,730.00. ES/MM/jsg/98 -171 i.doc 1 TEL 760 - 633 -2600 1 FAX 760- 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 1p� recycled paper (5) Pay a Flood Control Fee of $6,158.00. The rate is $0.21 /SF and is assessed on the private road improvements. Additional assessments will be levied during the development of the lots. (6) Provide the name, address, telephone number, and state license number and type of the construction contractor, if not Barrett American, Inc. (7) Provide proof of insurance meeting the requirements on the accompanying handout. (8) Provide a work schedule per Municipal Code 23.24.200. (9) Sign the Grading Permit. Any authorized representative of the property owner may sign. Permits are valid for no more than one year and may expire earlier due to expirations on letters of credit and /or insurance policies. Once the Engineering Permits are issued, advance notice of 48 hours must be given prior to you or your contractor scheduling the mandatory pre- construction conference. For more detail, especially on whose attendance is needed, and as a reminder, see Grading Note #9. Additionally, the attendance of the Project Planner, Diane Langager, who can be contacted at (760) 633- 2714, will be required. Informal phasing of the project may necessitate more than one such conference. The project is dependent on satisfactory progress of construction within Mesa North Upper to be done per Drawings 6145 -G and 61454. A separate Right -of -way Construction Permit will be required for any work in the public right - of -way of Quail Gardens Drive that is not shown on the approved Drawing. Typically, this work may include excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install electric, gas, telephone, and cable television lines, and set their vaults and pedestals. A Permit Fee of $250.00 per application, and a site plan, preferably the work order issued by the public utility, will be required. The contractor license and insurance requirements will remain unchanged. Permits must be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the start of work. Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits, all are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division, which can be contacted at (760) 633 -2704. An acceptable Traffic Control Plan will be required prior to the start of any work within the Quail Gardens Drive right -of -way. A typical plan shows all delineation, tapering, advance signage, temporary striping, barricades, and flagman positions, and provides a schedule of operations. Pursuant to Fire Department rules and regulations, prior to any combustible materials being placed on -site, the private road shall have received its first lift of asphalt paving. Construction changes, prepared by the Engineer of Work, should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposit. ES /MM /jsg/98 -171 i.doc2 s Prior to issuance of any Building Permit, a rough grading approval will be needed from the assigned Engineering Inspector. At a minimum, rough grading is defined as certified pad preparation and soil compaction, substantial completion of improvements, and safe access. A proportional reduction of up to 75% of the Security Deposit assigned to the Grading Permit may be merited and forthcoming. As- builts of Drawing 6038 -G, prepared by the Engineer of Work and approved by the Engineering Services Department, will be required prior to Final Inspection. Verification by the assigned Engineering Inspector of the setting of monuments deferred since approval of the Final Map, and certification and proof of payment for labor and materials, all by the Preparer of the Map, will be required prior to Final Inspection. Filing of Corner Records may be required. Submittal, approval, and recordation of a Certificate of Correction will be required if there are any changes in the implementation of Final Map instructions. Satisfactory resolution of all deferred monument issues will merit release of the Security Deposit assigned. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposit assigned to the Grading Permit. Please note that Building Permit final inspections are a separate event apart from any Engineering Permit final inspection and are not necessarily coincidental. This letter does not change subdivider or successor -in- interest obligations per the proposed Map. This letter is limited in scope. During the Building Permit process, you will need services and be subject to regulation from as follows: the Current Planning Division, Building Inspection Division, and Fire Prevention Bureau, all of the City, and the Olivenhain Municipal Water District, Leucadia County Water District, Encinitas Union School District and San Dieguito Union High School District, all separate public agencies. Please inquire at their respective counters. Additional engineering requirements will be forthcoming during the Building Permit process, including, but not necessarily limited to, coordination of the building site plan with the grading plan, resolution of any outstanding public improvement issues, and assessment and collection of traffic mitigation and additional flood control fees. Certain impact fees are subject to substantial increase in the near future; you may elect to pay early but only after formal submittal of building plans. As a condition of Building Permit issuance, Drawing 6038 -G will have to be amended to include Precise Grading. If there should be a substantial delay in the start of your project, please request an update of this letter. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2780, or you may wish to visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center. ES /MM /jsg /98 -171 i.doc3 Sincerely, w4-M Jeffrey S. Garami Engineering Technician Subdivision Engineering cc Hunsaker & Associates, San Diego, Inc., Engineer of work Diane langager, City Planner Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Carla Kay, Engineering Inspector Greg Caudill, Engineering Technician permit/file enc Security Obligation Agreement, Subdivision Improvements Right -of -way Construction Permit Standard Conditions Requirements for Proof of Insurance Utility Trench Backfill and Resurfacing Standard ES /M M /jsg /98 -171 i.doc4 JUN -09 -1000 06 :34 LEU�--HDIA COUNT'r WD 760 753 3094 P.03 CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMORANDUM TM 9a -1T1 DATE: 7119199 TO: Director, Engineering Services Department FROM: Leucadia County Water District SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval 254 -611 -07 09 810 (A.P. N.) 2 2lXhl U ENGINEERING SERVICES f,ITY OF FNCINITAS West side of Quail Gardens Drive between Swallowtail Rd. and Leucadia Blvd. (Address) sAlYL4rT g.�JE21fa� 'AJc (Subdlvlder) Please be advised that the Leucadia County Water District Conditions of Approval for Recordation of a Final Map for Case No. TM 916171 as required by Resolution No. PC 99 -07 have been satisfied. This tentative map expires on 01- 25 -2M. THIS MEMORANDUM MUST BE PROCESSED BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AND RETURNED TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. 9 Si �� Date SPmemo.doc TOTAL P.02 TOTAL P.03 June 28, 2000 Mr. Alan Archibald, City of Encinitas, 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Offsite permission to grade and construct improvements for TM 98 -171, Encinitas Ranch, North Mesa - Lower, Lot 75 of the City of Encinitas Tract No 94 -066. Dear Mr. Archibald, D. R. Horton San Diego Holding Company, a California Corporation, is the owner of Lot 67 of the City of Encinitas Tract No 94 -066 (APN 254 - 611 -04) according to the map thereof No 13356 filed in the office of the County Recorder for San Diego County, which is adjacent to Lot 75 referenced above. We have reviewed the Encinitas Ranch North Mesa -Lower Grading, Private Improvement and Sewer Plans which show grading and improvement work on our property. We hereby give our consent to the proposed work and grant Barratt American Incorporated, its successors and assigns, contractors and agents, permission to enter our property and perform grading and improvement operations for the construction of sewer facilities on our property in substantial conformance with the improvements as shown on TM 98 -171 and Grading plans 6038 -G as depicted on the attached exhibit "A ". D. R. Horton San Diego Holding Company. By: ill___'YL Title: Date: V5 � 0 �y� b 0 ffARINC DELTA I RADIUS LETCTI REY.fd6 8 N 09.47"T IJ196 9' PvC H630 9' FYc 9 N 21FII'JIW 10 N 1507''33 Y/ 18100 6' PA: 11 N 61'M57T 5139 9' PVC 12 11 350.00 75494 a PA: IJ JI'19'16, 350.00 191.JJ 8' PVC 14 12'19'16' J5000 76.28 B' PA: 15 N 4839'41 w 64.58 6' PA I6 4141105' 267061 145.51 B' PA: F7 N O7JJ'05T1' 144.J4 B' PVC' 18 N I899'4 IV JEW B' P✓C 2 20 J� V zs EA c zo' 1Q�`� z`\ uNm DEER rERl v G45'fME M _. - \ T \ 4 DEE SHEET 3 = �. \\ \\ E IN LAN IN PLAN 1s1 « hat, SECTION B —B 7J ri o ,. NOT TO SCALE 0 40' SEWER __. 2 \" Ol. \�"fo _ zD (.49EMENP - J344J 9 b0 uy. 2tl�4` oo 80 120' REC \ - \ i G \ ° SE'E mic ' m+ i - — �L �T e7 « 8.89.48 C - 0 � ` ` vu c ' t SEpT,,, g. Y�..S �.. li �, �� - • - \V -. n, r -w„ ..1r :. 'His sHFEr '� Y `\ �`�\ \ \ u 3 m dd?<4 lox t � �, 38.50 J2 I m fsaffy;,Z .a., r x i '; 1 2N \ I. >. 2ox v Ell 80' 1$0 Y �U '� ,., f� � ,��yr \� ^ S ' 1 � �� - Eye✓ ^»o�m �'�7. �.. �.' /roeF e' c.o. 1 // y�i J8+9s.a3 °' r \6 TN a Exsnrvc MISE ro i / :27 J.25 8 i n 0, IT, .4i _ - .4P LbT z � 1 Y.,, Ex/snn's REMO & T 93 1 1 e+snoN1 9\ NS / ggyyyy \ _ MEEO O- FROM NOTE::.. OFFSIIE WiADlRC SEWER D ACCESS DWG #6145 I, CONrw.CTOR TO F1EJn vcE RF.velr° �i,, �ExImNO 1A M99 . �p - "REA o . pPO"P a� a'ioo = E` HORIZONTAL ANO VER11CA1 PoS7 LY.WF GRTOR W ANONPoC NEEOEO 'a5 OE ivma E 11 AND NDT% lHE PAM TO JiEAIMN IF SAID PLAN IS APPROVED AT TIME OF WEPoLT Mo ENGINEER OF wDR =`" L CONSTRUCTION. (LCWD # 1919 -59) ANT DISCREPAN ES' AIVIE_ ON D AACEDIFY xc}xseAex 1RStudrroN.- REVISIONS APPROVED DATE REFERENCES DATE BENCH MARK I SCALE 'R" RawN ET 1 CHECKED B. APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RD H.A. DRAWING N0. Deanmx: M ONAP EWNDA3.. 11.-11. PLANS PRE "ARED UNDER SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APPROVED GRADING AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR W"AX" 11'S/. AL BAIRIM1 NF Cl DOW HORIZONTAL 1" 4d DATE BY'. BY ENCINITAS RANCH IEOMNOR V WRPI OF w DEW <o EIEMWN: 1.,.15 VERTICAL N A R.D.E. NO. ABBTD DATE: DATE. NORTH MESA -LOWER -- gIDU: 0i RAYMOND I- MARTIN EXP. 6/3D/00 TM NO. 98 -01 0 SHEET 8 OF 18 o cnn/ nrr-%T IrI Tf_'%X7 OLIVE N THAI Municipal Water District 1966 Olivenhain Road • Encinitas, CA 92024 • Phonc (760) 753 -6466 • Fax (760) 753 -1578 June 22, 2000 City of Encinitas Engineering Dept. 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: TM 98 -171 Please be advised that the division of property shown on TM 98 -171 will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any easements held by Olivenhain Municipal Water District (O.M.W.D.) within the boundaries of said tentative map. This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the District's rights, title or of the provisions contained in said easement(s), nor a waiver of costs for relocation of any interest in and to said easement(s); nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any affected facilities. In the event that the development requires relocation of facilities on the subject property, which facilities exist by right of easement or otherwise, the owner /developer will be responsible to bear the full cost of such relocation and provide O.M.W.D. with suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replacement rights are required prior to the performance of the relocation. If additional information is required in connection with the above mentioned subject, please contact George Briest, Engineering Manager, at (760) 753 -6466. Olivenhain Municipal Water District M. Kelley Gage Engineering Project Administrator Cc: George Briest, OMWD Board of Directors General Manager Ann L Peav, President Dasid C. McColiorn Harold L Gano, Tice Prestdvir Legal Counsel Hadev L Denk, Secretary Peltaer d Oliva Thebna M. Miller, Treasurer Susan J. Varni Director , JUL 12 2uuj L` ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS A public agencv proudly serving portions of Leucadia, Cardiff, Solana Beach, Rancho Santa Fe, Encinitas, Carlsbad, San Diego and the Olivenhain Vallev. PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING IRVINE RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO DAVE HAMMAR JACK HILL LE)! WILLIMAN ALISA VIALPANDO 10179 Huennekens St. San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 5584500 PH (85 8) 558.1414 F % ..hunsakeccom Info®HunsakerSD.Conn HUN SAKE R &ASSOCIATES 5 A N 0 1 E G O, i N C. April 27, 2000 Mr. Jeff Garami City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Street Names for North Mesa — Lower TM 98 -171 Dear Jeff: We would like to submit for your approval the following street name and two alternates: Lauren Court Alternates: Nicholas Court Sophie Court Please advise at your earliest convenience the approved street name. Sincerely, Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. //ELF — C�4tiA.++'t Diane Ingram Engineering Department �IU L MAY 3 0 UUU J DIM k:W Wt3000'IW.Ez wu.OlCL1R HUNSAKER &ASSE OCIATES 5 A N 0 I G O. 1 N C. PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING October 1, 1999 IRVINE LAS VEGAS RIVERSIDE Mr. Blair Knoll SAN DIEGO Associate Civil Engineer City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: Encinitas Ranch North Mesa (Dwg. 6038 -G) Response to First Plan Check Comments Dear Mr. Knoll: 1 _ I 1 OC cFPV10E'S This letter serves as an item by item response to the comments in your attached letter regarding the Private Grading and Improvement 1 s' Plan Check of Encinitas Ranch North Mesa, dated July 28, 1999. Grading Plan 1. Ownership change is eminent, if not transferred by next plan check will revise. 2. Done. 3. Done. 4. Done. 5. Currently working on obtaining letter. 6. All paved driveways will be proposed on this project's plot plans. 7. Done. 8. Done. 9. Done. 10. Done. 11. Done. 12. Proposed design is more practical and will discharge runoff ultimately into DAVE HAMMAR the same natural canyon. JACK MILL LEX WILLIMAN 13. Currently working on. 14. Due to the raising of the sewer main, this is not a major concern and can be 10179 Huennekens St. more practically worked out in the field during construction. Suite 200 15. Done. San Diego, CA 92121 (6191 SS &4500 PM 16. Additional public improvement plan submitted for plan check (Dwg. 6038 -1). (619) 558 -1414 r X w .hunsaker.com Info®MUnsakerSD.conI nD "p 1�"98B@C .n. ozw tv City of Encinitas Encinitas Ranch North Mesa October 1, 1999 Page 2 17. Done. 18. Done. 19. Done. Should you have any questions or require any additional materials, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully, Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, IncC� Robert D'Amaro Engineering Department FD M k ��19 4U w. mN.132 HUN SAKE R & ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O, I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX PROJECT COMMUNICATION DATE: August 10, 1999 TYPE OF COMMUNICATION: PROJECT: North Mesa -Lower ❑ Meeting N Phone w.O. #: 294 -132 ❑ Letter ❑ Fax IN ATTENDANCE: Steve Deering -Dudek Eng. DISTRIBUTION: N Project File N Attendees N Blair Knoll N Project Manager N Lesley Ryan ❑ DISCUSSION: The 35' deep proposed sewer main necessary by condition SCV to gravity sewer lot 17 is not acceptable by the District and another alternative will have to be designed. The District has no objection to a private pump station at lot 17. Other gravity outlet methods for lot 17 will need to be looked at, Dudek will supply an overall existing sewer facility plan in the applicable area to help find other alternatives through the adjacent open space lots, however, this may run the sewer through environmentally sensitive areas. SUBMITTED: Robert D'Amaro City Of Encinitas July 28, 1999 Mr. Raymond L. Martin 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, CA 92121 SUBJECT: 1 " PLAN CHECK OF ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA LOWER (DWG. 6038 -G) I13�! UV=U ,"171 l This letter serves to summarize the outstanding issues on drawing no. 6038 -G that must be addressed prior to obtaining final plan and map approval. We hope this letter will clarify any questions you may have about specific issues on the plans. Grading Plan 1. Clarify the discrepancy between ownership as indicated on the grading plans (Barratt American Homes, Inc.) and as noted in the submitted title report (Encinitas Ranch LLC). 2. Depict visibility triangles and the accompanying note at the Quail Gardens Drive / Private Street intersection as indicated on the plan and the attached diagram. 3. Depict and callout buffer areas and building on the grading plan in accordance with the tentative map. 4. Revise the drainage study to address the capacity of the existing drainage ditch on Lot 19. If the channel is undersized, the plans should reflect how this issue will be addressed. Provide flow line elevations and a splash wall at the proposed 90 degree confluence as noted on sheet 4. 5. Provide a letter of permission for the proposed offsite grading north of the project boundary. 6. Provide a paved access drive from Lot 17 to the private street as noted on sheet 4. TEL 760 -633 -2600 1 FAX 760 -633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 Too 760 -633 -2700 0 recycled paper Mr. Raymond L. Marti July 28, 1999 Page 2 of 4 7. Show short legal descriptions for adjacent properties on the plan. 8. Depict the construction of D -27 drainage outlets for each lot, and revise the cost estimate accordingly. 9. Depict the location of proposed driveways for each lot. 10. Revise the plans to provide a minimum grade break of 1% at the angle point of the proposed cross gutter as noted on sheet 5. 11. Revise the curb data table on sheet 5 as noted. 12. Identify why the connection to the offsite storm drain as shown on the approved tentative map is no longer proposed on the plans. 13. Provide a letter of permission from ERGA for offsite grading and improvements at the proposed offsite sewer location. 14. Identify the location of the temporary stockpile / staging area to be utilized during the construction of the offsite sewer. as noted on sheet 7. 15. Depict the location of the wildlife crossing vunstructed per dwg no. 5661 -I on the plan and profile. Identify and address conflicts associated with the proposed sewer construction and associated improvements. 16. The plans should be revised to depict all improvements constructed per 4457 -I and to include accommodations for slope drainage, storm drain extensions, additional rip - rap, and other improvements as needed to mitigate the impact of the new construction upon existing conditions. It appears as though the proposed grading associated with the construction of the offsite sewer north of the project boundary will impact existing drainage improvements (stormdrain, bench swales, downdrain, and outlet structure) constructed per 4457 -1. If required, modification of the existing storm drain should be constructed per a separate public improvement plan with associated hydrology calculations, cost estimate, and other supporting documentation. 17. Provide a 20 foot wide gravel entry way at the project entrance as part of the erosion control plan. 18. Revise the cost estimate and hydrology report as noted. 19. Address all other issues as noted in the redline comments. Mr. Raymond L. Marti: July 28, 1999 Page 3 of 4 Final Map 1. Clarify the discrepancy between ownership as indicated on the grading plans (Barratt American Homes, Inc.) and as noted in the submitted title report (Encinitas Ranch LLC). 2. Provide a letter stating costs of deferred monumentation. 3. Provide a subdivision guarantee and tax certificate. 4. Provide a copy of the NAD -83 ties on disk. 5. Provide letters from easement holders stating that they do not object to the recordation of the map. 6. Coordinate with the Community Development Department regarding the addition of fuel modification zones and setbacks to the map. 7. Revise the traverse calculations as noted on the returned document. 8. Obtain interdepartmental memo approvals (provided with this plancheck). 9. Add a certificate for the abandonment of the existing open space easement as noted on sheet one. 10. Coordinate with the Community Development Department regarding the required language for the grant of easement on Lots 19 and 17 as noted on sheet one. 11. Address how the existing easements for ingress, egress, and public road purposes that traverse through proposed lots are to be quitclaimed. 12. Provide private slope maintenance easements, private road easements and public landscape maintenance easements as shown on the approved tentative map and as noted on sheet 3. 13. Provide copies of the recorded easements to Leucadia County Water District and to Olivenhain Municipal Water District. Complete the record information in the easement notes as noted on sheet 3. 14. Revise the location of the proposed private stormdrain easement to encompass the proposed stormdrain alignment as shown on 6038 G. If an offsite alignment is proposed (per the approved tentative map) then plats, legal descriptions and title reports for the offsite private stormdrain easements will be required. Mr. Raymond L. Marti. July 28, 1999 Page 4 of 4 15. Provide open space and slope maintenance easements across lots 1 through 6 as per the approved tentative map and as noted on sheet 5. 16. Submit proposed street name with two alternate choices. 17. Address all other redline comments as noted on the final map. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 760 - 633 -2793. Sincerely, ?� z,- Blair A. Knoll, PE, PLS Associate Civil Engineer c: Alan Archibald, Director of Engineering Services Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Jeremy Riddle, John Powell & Associates Tamara O'Neal, John Powell & Associates Diane Langager, Associate Planner 0---Fsempra Energy City of Encinitas Engineering Dept. 505 So. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 ATTN: BLAIR KNOLL July 23, 1999 RE: CITY OF ENCINTAS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 98 -171 Please be advised that the division of the property shown on Tentative TRACT Map No. 98 -171 will not unreasonable interfere with the free and complete exercise of any easement(s), held by San Diego Gas & Electric Company within the boundaries of said map. This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company's rights, title and of the provisions contained in said easement(s), or a waiver of costs for relocation of any interest in and to said easement(s), nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any affected facilities. In the event that the development requires relocation of facilities, on the subject property, which facilities exist by right of easement or otherwise, the owner the owner /developer will be requested to bear the costs of such relocation and provide SDG &E with suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replacement rights are required prior to the performance of the relocation. If additional information is required in connection with the above Rolanda Hayward at (619) 654 -1256, 1 am employed by Sempra agent for San Diego Gas & Electric. Respectfully, yaL Rolanda F. Hayward Administrative Associate Duly Authorized Agent for SDG &E Land Management Cc: Hunsaker & Associates mentioned subject, please call Energy as a duly authorized Daniels Cabievislon Inc. P.O. Box 344 Carlsbad, CA 92018 -0344 ^Pww"/Yt ' i VMbW0WQW V 1QJS%o: I July 6, 1999 Mr. Dave Vlere, Land Surveyor 6191568 -1414 FAX Hunsaker & Associates 10179 Huennekens Street, #200 San Diego, CA 92121 RE: City of Enacinitas Tract No. 98 -171 Dear Mr. Viera: 0 In accordance with your letter of June 25, 1999, Daniels Cablevision, Inc. hereby waives Its right to object to omission of signature from the final map for the subject location. Very C Larry'Guthrie Technical Operations Supervisor Daniels Cablevision, Inc. m Isltr Business Of'Ice 438 -7741 a Custcmer Service 931 -7000 • Advertising Sales 438 -7819 5720 El Camino Real • Carlsbad, California 92008-7298 r!l 561901LO `•r9v9 9Eb 09L NOISIA319VO S12INVO :Aq 1ueS a_ - �u.aw .a�...�,...•�• SECTION REMARKS 1. SIZE or SWEET 2. SCALE AND NORTH ARROW 3. NUMBERING AND CROSS REFERENCE OF SHEETS 4 4, COUNTY TRACT DeSIQNATION ON EACH SHEET S. CAL. OOORD_ INDEX - GRADING PLAN NUMBER SHOWN 6. COUNTY TM NUMBER SENORA ON EACH SHEET al. 50 7. SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE AND PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT FURNISHED 81.302.5 6 81.50 K 8. DEED AND CERTIFIED LEGAL. DESCRIPTIOH FURNISHED 81.5 N. TITLE SHEET 1. - C6RTIPIGTES: PROPER ARD OM CORRECT IDCATION 81.511 66434(a) , 66435, 66436(a -d) 66439, 66440 66441, 66442 2. PREAMBLE OF DESCRIPTION OP PROPERTY SHOWN e 3. SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE STA SHOWN 8 .50 4. CERTIFIED MEETS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION STATEMENT SHOWN 0 5. DEDICATION CERTIFICATE COMPLETE 43 8 6. CONDOMINIUM NOTE OR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL NOTE SHOWN A / (IP BEND �U/ 7_ OPEN SPACE EASEMENT GRANT CO S. OWNERS CERTIFICATE SHORN AND AGREES WITH Nor SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE 9. TRUSTEES CERTIFICATE SHOWN AND AGREES WITH SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE 66436-C i 81.509 Nm 7v 10. SUBORDINATION CERTIFICATE - SIGNATURE REQUIRED 66436 L 6643'9 1,1. S GNATURE HOT REQUIRED CERTIFICATES 66436 -C 12. TITLE INTEREST PARTIES ACCOUNTED MR 66436 i 81.509 �13. AC DGEM__M CENT FICATE FOR ALL SIGNATORES 66436 14. BOND AND ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE SHOWN 81.507(a ) _ 15. 7ANCH CE PIGTE C01@LETE 66440 ' 16. FLOOD CON'ROL DISTRICT ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE SHOWN 81.402(h 17. ENGINEER'S OR SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE COMPLETE 66441 18. BOARD O SUPERVISORS TAX CERTIFICATE SHOWN 81.5070)). 19. COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE SHOWN 66441 _ 20. COUNTY COUNSH, CERTIFICATE EMC, 81.507(d) L 81.510 21. - AEGOROER'S CERTIFICAIE FOR ACCEPTANCE OP MAP 81.507(c) _ 22. MAP SIGNED AND ACKNOWLEDGED 8Y ALL INTERESTED PARTIES B C. PROCEDURE OF SURVEY SHEET _ INFOY41AYI-ON-MOOR AS REQUIRED BY COUNTY STANDARD PRACTICE a, cr >rr 66434 bl b. CINITY MAP C. GE[OPAL P OF SUBDIVISION SNOUN d. LOCATION IN RELATION TO SURROUNDING MAPS, SECTION CORNERS, HIGHWAYS, ETC. 66434(e) L 81.506(a e. TITS TO MOM MONUMENTS 66434 e f. LEGEND: 1) FOUND MONUMENTS SHOWN AS CLOSED SYMBOL 2) SET MONUMENTS SHOWN AS OPEN SYMBOL 3) FOUND MONUMENTS LABELED PER RECORD DATA (OR NO RECORD) 6643 a 6 81.50 d 4) MONUMENTS SET IN ACCORDANCE WI7E SECTION 81.40 a -1 5) MONUMENTS MARKED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION q. BASIS OF BEARINGS CORRECT AND COMPLETE 81.506(b) h. TAL AREA( 4• 7 GTOTAL NUMBER LOTS( (°, ) I/ BEGINNING AND ENDING LOT NUMBERS i. SOILS TEST REPORT NOTE 81.208 L 81.507(8) 6 81.512 66434 'Y /' j. AREAS SLI&TECT TO FLOOD SHOWN ON MAP k. AREAS NOT MC.U)ED IN SUB. MARKED: "NOT A PART OF 141A ' THIS SUBOIVISIDM• I. TIES To NON. SET AND FOUND INCLUDES OFFSET N m. TIES TO SURROUNDING TRACTS, BEARING 6 DISTANCE 66 4 n. RECORD BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN WHERE DIFFERENT / FROM MEASURED V b. HEAVY LINE AROUND BOUNDARY OF SUBDIVISION 1 SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY LABELED 21 P.O.B. i T.P.O.B. SHOWN Form 769 (7/78 -0572) PAGE 1 OF 3 CO(NTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SNR2:T FOR SUBDIVISION IMPS �j I I � E XTENDED EXPIRATION DATE c URVEYOIN OR ENGINEER ICON /V • • (�I I GL� ,/�Q .Y CHANGES INITIATED BY THE N NOTE: THE COLORS RED 6 GREEN 0 00 NOT OBSCURE NOTATIONS ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR SHOULD A ARE RESERVED FOR DKPART74i'NT OF O ON PRINT'S INEN SHADING BE FLAGGED OUT ON NEW PRINTS T TRANSPORTATION USE ONLY O OFF CORRECTIONS SECTION REMARKS 1. SIZE or SWEET 2. SCALE AND NORTH ARROW 3. NUMBERING AND CROSS REFERENCE OF SHEETS 4 4, COUNTY TRACT DeSIQNATION ON EACH SHEET S. CAL. OOORD_ INDEX - GRADING PLAN NUMBER SHOWN 6. COUNTY TM NUMBER SENORA ON EACH SHEET al. 50 7. SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE AND PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT FURNISHED 81.302.5 6 81.50 K 8. DEED AND CERTIFIED LEGAL. DESCRIPTIOH FURNISHED 81.5 N. TITLE SHEET 1. - C6RTIPIGTES: PROPER ARD OM CORRECT IDCATION 81.511 66434(a) , 66435, 66436(a -d) 66439, 66440 66441, 66442 2. PREAMBLE OF DESCRIPTION OP PROPERTY SHOWN e 3. SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE STA SHOWN 8 .50 4. CERTIFIED MEETS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION STATEMENT SHOWN 0 5. DEDICATION CERTIFICATE COMPLETE 43 8 6. CONDOMINIUM NOTE OR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL NOTE SHOWN A / (IP BEND �U/ 7_ OPEN SPACE EASEMENT GRANT CO S. OWNERS CERTIFICATE SHORN AND AGREES WITH Nor SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE 9. TRUSTEES CERTIFICATE SHOWN AND AGREES WITH SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE 66436-C i 81.509 Nm 7v 10. SUBORDINATION CERTIFICATE - SIGNATURE REQUIRED 66436 L 6643'9 1,1. S GNATURE HOT REQUIRED CERTIFICATES 66436 -C 12. TITLE INTEREST PARTIES ACCOUNTED MR 66436 i 81.509 �13. AC DGEM__M CENT FICATE FOR ALL SIGNATORES 66436 14. BOND AND ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE SHOWN 81.507(a ) _ 15. 7ANCH CE PIGTE C01@LETE 66440 ' 16. FLOOD CON'ROL DISTRICT ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE SHOWN 81.402(h 17. ENGINEER'S OR SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE COMPLETE 66441 18. BOARD O SUPERVISORS TAX CERTIFICATE SHOWN 81.5070)). 19. COUNTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE SHOWN 66441 _ 20. COUNTY COUNSH, CERTIFICATE EMC, 81.507(d) L 81.510 21. - AEGOROER'S CERTIFICAIE FOR ACCEPTANCE OP MAP 81.507(c) _ 22. MAP SIGNED AND ACKNOWLEDGED 8Y ALL INTERESTED PARTIES B C. PROCEDURE OF SURVEY SHEET _ INFOY41AYI-ON-MOOR AS REQUIRED BY COUNTY STANDARD PRACTICE a, cr >rr 66434 bl b. CINITY MAP C. GE[OPAL P OF SUBDIVISION SNOUN d. LOCATION IN RELATION TO SURROUNDING MAPS, SECTION CORNERS, HIGHWAYS, ETC. 66434(e) L 81.506(a e. TITS TO MOM MONUMENTS 66434 e f. LEGEND: 1) FOUND MONUMENTS SHOWN AS CLOSED SYMBOL 2) SET MONUMENTS SHOWN AS OPEN SYMBOL 3) FOUND MONUMENTS LABELED PER RECORD DATA (OR NO RECORD) 6643 a 6 81.50 d 4) MONUMENTS SET IN ACCORDANCE WI7E SECTION 81.40 a -1 5) MONUMENTS MARKED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION q. BASIS OF BEARINGS CORRECT AND COMPLETE 81.506(b) h. TAL AREA( 4• 7 GTOTAL NUMBER LOTS( (°, ) I/ BEGINNING AND ENDING LOT NUMBERS i. SOILS TEST REPORT NOTE 81.208 L 81.507(8) 6 81.512 66434 'Y /' j. AREAS SLI&TECT TO FLOOD SHOWN ON MAP k. AREAS NOT MC.U)ED IN SUB. MARKED: "NOT A PART OF 141A ' THIS SUBOIVISIDM• I. TIES To NON. SET AND FOUND INCLUDES OFFSET N m. TIES TO SURROUNDING TRACTS, BEARING 6 DISTANCE 66 4 n. RECORD BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN WHERE DIFFERENT / FROM MEASURED V b. HEAVY LINE AROUND BOUNDARY OF SUBDIVISION 1 SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY LABELED 21 P.O.B. i T.P.O.B. SHOWN Form 769 (7/78 -0572) PAGE 1 OF 3 Form 769 (7/78 -0572) PAGE 1 OF 3 MS: OPpw ITEMS 1. STRUT VACATION: IUWlW1 11Ua Mlln 2. ANNEXATION TO A DISTRICT 3, ZONE RECLASSIFICATION /DELETION OF PROVISIONAL ZONING 4. GEOLOGY REPORT 66434(f), 66490, 66491, 8. ).5: FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT LETTER 6. LETTER FROM CONTRACT COMPLIANCE OFFICE 7. CATV LETTER 8. CONFORMANCE WITH COMMUNITY PLAN - SPECIFIC PLAN LETTER FROM L.0 (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF NAP GOING TO BOARD) 9. LETTER FROM SEWER DISTRICT (NOT IN SANITATION DISTRICT) CONSENTING TO SERVH SUBDIVISION INTO ITS SEWER SYSTEM 10. COASTAL COMMISSION LETTER 11. LMPROVPIMENT PLANS SIGN® AND AGREES WITH FINAL MAP 12. IMPROVEMHNT COSTS PREPARED 13. FEES: a. NAP FEE 8: b. LIGHTING DEPOSIT c. INPROVEXENT INSPECTION 8: d. LAB e. LOT STAKE CHECK FEE f. TRAFFIC SIGNAL g.DGH OEPO$IT h. PARE FEE MOB BORD) 66477, 81.41 f. PLAN CHECK J. GRADING FEE k. GRADING PERMIT FEE 1. EROSION BOND (IF REQUIRED) o. OTHER: 1) 2) 3) 4) 14. 15. F_ COUNTY PROCESSING CHECK LIST 1. MAP SIGNED b ACKNOWLEDGE M a. OWNERS b. TRUSTEES c. SUBORDINATION CERTIF d. e. 2. ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE S AGENDA DATE 3. MAP SIGNED BY FLOOD CONI 4. MAP SIGNED BY COUNTY ENG 5. IRRIGATION DISTRICT TAX 6. COPY OF E.I.R. FOR BOARD 7. SMALL NAP FOR BOARD B. BOARD LETTER PREPARED 9. INSTRUMENT Of CREDIT FOR (IF REWIRED) 10. BOND PACKAGE OR INSTKUME PREPARED, EXECUTED, AN 11. TAX BOND 12. PARK BOND OR CERTIFIED C 13. ALL ITEMS OF RESOLUTION 14. 15. 16. 17. PAGE 3 OF 3 A4 S A04M0 DOC ` 2000. 0478448 SEP 06, 2000 2:30 PM Recording Requested By: ) OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE City of Encinitas ) GKGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER FEES: 26.00 When Recorded Mail to: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92024 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY W qm )1 -Fgv PRIVATE ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR TM 98 -171 Assessor's Parcel No. 254 - 611 - 07.09, 10 r / ✓ Project No.: TM 98 -171 W.O. No.: 6038 FM THIS AGREEMENT for the maintenance and repair of that certain private road easement, to the legal description and/or plat of which is set forth in Exhibit% � B attached hereto and those private drainage facilities, the legal description and/or plat of which is set forth in Exhibit$ attached hereto and made a part hereof, is entered into by. Barratt American Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Developer ") for the benefit of future subdivision lot owners who will use the private road easement (hereinafter referred to as "lot owners ", which shall include the Developer to the extent the Developer retains any ownership interest in any lot or lots). WHEREAS, this Agreement is required as a condition of approval by the City of Encinitas of a subdivision project as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources code and pursuant to City of Encinitas Municipal Code Section 24.16.060 and Section 24.29.040; and WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of certain real property being subdivided and developed as TM 98 -171 that will use and enjoy the benefit of said road easement. A complete legal description of said real property is attached, labeled Attachment A , and incorporated by reference. Said real property is hereinafter referred to as the "property "; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Developer that said private road easement and drainage facilities be maintained in a safe and usable condition by the lot owners; and Recording Requested by: ) City of Encinitas ) When Recorded Mail To: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) ( Encinitas. CA 92024 ) t ) 000 w 2000-0478446 SEP 06, 2000 2:38 PM OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO MIM RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, COU{IY RECORDER FEES: 18.00 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ,/ COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY _Ie WAIVER OF PROTEST TO ASSESSMENTS Assessor's Parcel Number: 254- IA- 0i-10 Project No. TM98 -171 /H w A. Barratt American Incorporated, A Delaware K I. Corporation ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TM 98 -171 , ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows: See Attachment "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of TM 98 -171 OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: No protest shall be made by the owners to any proceedings for the installation or acquisition of street improvements, including undergrounding of utility lines, under any special assessment 1911 or the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, or any other applicable state or local law, and whether processed by the City of Encinitas or any other governmental entity having jurisdiction in the matter and for the purposes of determining property owners support for same. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. waiver.doc cls 06/30/00(01- 11 -93) Recording Requested by: elfy En9igeel- When Recorded Mail To City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue DOC .. 1000- 0478445 SEP Oe. 2000 2:38 PM OFFICIAL RECORDS SRN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER FEES: 34.00 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON qW FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. w Assessor's Parcel No. 254 - 611 -07, 09, 10 Project No.: TM 98 -171 Ki� Y W.O. No.: 6038 FM A. Barratt American Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TM 98- 171 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of private improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required private improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter) , SUBDIVIDER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Exhibit B which is attached hereto and made a pan hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. Recording Requested By City of Encinitas ) When Recorded Mail to: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY PRIVATE ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR TM 98-171 Assessor's Parcel No. 254- 611 -07, 09, 10 Project No.: TM 98 -171 W.O. No.: 6038 FM THIS AGREEMENT for the maintenance and repair of that certain private road easement, the legal description and/or plat of which is set forth in Exhibit$1 ' B " attached hereto and those private drainage facilities, the legal description and/or plat of which is set forth in Exhibit$ attached hereto and made a part hereof, is entered into by. Barratt American Incorporated. a Delaware Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Developer ") for the benefit of future subdivision lot owners who will use the private road easement (hereinafter referred to as "lot owners ", which shall include the Developer to the extent the Developer retains any ownership interest in any lot or lots). WHEREAS, this Agreement is required as a condition of approval by the City of Encinitas of a subdivision project as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources code and pursuant to City of Encinitas Municipal Code Section 24.16.060 and Section 24.29.040; and WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of certain real property being subdivided and developed as TM 98 -171 that will use and enjoy the benefit of said road easement. A complete legal description of said real property is attached, labeled Attachment A , and incorporated by reference. Said real property is hereinafter referred to as the "property "; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Developer that said private road easement and drainage facilities be maintained in a safe and usable condition by the lot owners; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Developer to establish a method for the maintenance and repair of said private road easement and drainage facilities and for the apportionment of the expense of such maintenance and repair among existing and future lot owners; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Developer that this Agreement constitute a covenant running with the land, binding upon each successive lot owner of all or any portion of the property. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS. 1. The property is benefitted by this Agreement, and present and successive lot owners of all or any portion of the property are expressly bound hereby for the benefit of the land. 2. The cost and expense of maintaining the private road easement and drainage facilities shall be divided equally among the subdivided parcels created in the subdivision and paid by the lot owner of the heirs, assigns and successors in interest or each such owner. 3. In the event any of the herein described parcels of land are subdivided further, the lot owners, heirs, assigns and successors in interest of each such newly created parcel shall be liable under this Agreement for their then pro rata share of expenses and such pro rata shares of expenses shall be computed to reflect such newly created parcels. 4. The repairs and maintenance to be performed under this Agreement shall be limited to the following unless the consent for additional work is agreed to by a majority vote of the lot owners owning 100% of the number of parcels, including subdivisions thereof as described in Paragraph 3 above: reasonable and normal road improvement and maintenance work to adequately maintain said private road easement and drainage facilities to permit all - weather access and conveyance of storm flows. Repairs and maintenance under this Agreement shall include, but is not limited to, filling of chuckholes, repairing cracks, repairing and resurfacing of roadbeds, repairing and maintaining drainage structures, removing debris, maintaining signs, markers, striping and lighting, if any, and other work reasonably necessary and proper to repair and preserve the easement for all- weather road purposes. 5. If there is a covenant, agreement, or other obligation imposed as a condition of subdivision approval to make private road improvements to the private road easement, the obligation to repair and maintain the private road easement as herein set forth shall commence when the private road improvements have been completed and approved by the City. 6. Any extraordinary repair required to correct damage to said road easement or drainage facility that results from action taken or contracted for by lot owners or their successors in interest shall be paid for by the party taking action or party contracting for work which caused the necessity for the extraordinary repair. The repair shall be such as to restore the road easement or drainage facility to the condition existing prior to said damage. 7. It is agreed that Developer is initially the agent to contract and oversee and do all acts necessary to accomplish the repairs and maintenance required and/or authorized under this Agreement. Developer further agrees that the agent may at any time U replaced at the direction of a majority of the lot owners. Repair and maintenance work on the private road easement and drainage facilities shall be commenced when a majority of the lot owners agree in writing that such work is needed. The agent shall obtain three bids from licensed contractors and shall accept the lowest of said three bids and shall then initiate the work. The agent shall be paid for all costs incurred including a reasonable compensation for the agent's services, and such costs shall be added to and paid as a part of the repair and maintenance costs; provided, however, that compensation for the agent's services shall in no event exceed an amount equivalent to 10% of the actual cost of repairs and maintenance performed. In performing his duties, the agent, as he anticipates the need for funds, shall notify the parties and each party shall within forty -five (45) days pay the agent, who shall maintain a trustee account and also maintain accurate accounting records which are to be available for inspection by any party or authorized agent upon reasonable request. All such records shall be retained by the agent for a period of five years. 8. Should any lot owner fail to pay the pro rata share of costs and expenses as provided in this Agreement, then the agent or any lot owner or owners shall be entitled without further notice to institute legal action for the collection of funds advanced on behalf of such lot owner in accordance with the provisions of California Civil Code Section 845, and shall be entitled to recover in such action in addition to the funds advanced, interest thereon at the current prime rate of interest, until paid, all costs and disbursements of such action, including such sum or sums as the Court may fix as and for a reasonable attorneys fees. 9. Any liability of the lot owners for personal injury to the agent hereunder, or to any worker employed to make repairs or provide maintenance under this Agreement, or to third persons, as well as any liability of the lot owners for damage to the property of agent, or any such worker, or of any third persons, as a result of or arising out of repairs and maintenance under this Agreement, shall be home, as between the lot owners in the same percentages as they bear the costs and expenses of such repairs and maintenance. Each lot owner shall be responsible for and maintain his own insurance, if any. By this Agreement, the Developer does not intend to provide for the sharing of liability with respect to personal injury or property damage other than that attributable to the repairs and maintenance undertaken under this Agreement. Each of the lot owners agrees to indemnify the others from any and all liability for injury to himself or damage to his property when such injury or damage results from, arises out of, or is attributable to any maintenance or repairs undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. 10. Lot owners shall jointly and severally defend and indemnify and hold harmless City, City's engineer and its consultants and each of its officials, directors, officers, agents and employees from and against all liability, claims, damages, losses, expenses, personal injury and other costs, including costs of defense and attorney's fees, to the agent hereunder or to any lot owner, any contractor, any subcontractor, any user of the road easement, or to any other third persons arising out of or in any way related to the use of, repair or maintenance of, or the failure to repair or maintain the private road easement or drainage facilities. Nothing in the Agreement, the specifications or other contract documents or City's approval of the plans and specifications or inspection of the work is intended to include a review, inspection acknowledgement of a responsibility for any such matter, and City, City's engineer and its consultants, and each of its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents, shall have no responsibility or liability therefore. 11. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land and shall be deemed to be for the benefit of the land of each of the lot owners and each and every person who shall at anytime own all or any portion of the property referred to herein. 12. It is understood and agreed that the covenants herein contained shall be binding on the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assignees of each of the lot owners. 13. It is the purpose of the signatories hereto that this instrument be recorded to the end and intent that the obligation hereby created shall be and constitute a covenant running with the land and any subsequent purchaser of all or any portion thereof, by acceptance of delivery of a deed and/or conveyance regardless of form, shall be deemed to have consented to and become bound by these presents, including without limitation, the right of any person entitled to enforce the terms of this Agreement to institute legal action as provided in Paragraph 8 hereof, such remedy to be cumulative and in addition to other remedies provided in this Agreement and to all other remedies at law or in equity. 14. The terns of this Agreement may be amended in writing upon majority approval of the lot owners and consent of the City. 15. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, the validity, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby. 16. If the Property constitutes a "Common Interest Development" as defined in California Civil Code Section 1351(c) which will include membership in or ownership of an "Association" as defined in California Civil Code Section 1351(a), anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, the following provisions shall apply at and during such time as (i) the Property is encumbered by a "Declaration" (as defined in California Civil Code Section 1351(h), and (ii) the Common Area of the property (including the private road easement) is managed and controlled by an Association: (a) The Association, through its Board of Directors, shall repair and maintain the private road easement and drainage facilities and shall be deemed the "agent" as referred to in Paragraph 7 above. The Association, which shall not be replaced except by amendment to the Declaration, shall receive no compensation for performing such duties. The costs of such maintenance and repair shall be assessed against each owner and his subdivision interest in the Property pursuant to the Declaration. The assessments shall be deposited in the Association's corporate account. (b) The provisions in the Declaration which provide for assessment liens in favor of the Association and enforcement thereof shall supersede Paragraph 8 of the Agreement in its entirety. No individual owners shall have the right to alter, maintain or repair any of the Common Area (as defined in California Civil Code Section 1351(6) in the Property except as may be allowed by the Declaration. (c) This Agreement shall not be interpreted in any manner which reduces or limits the Association's rights and duties pursuant to its Bylaws and Declaration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day of , 19 Devel pe . Pi" Signature of DEVELOPER must be notarized. Attach the appropriate acknowledgement. CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of San Diego On July 11, 2000 before me, Kristina O'Connell, Notary Public Date Nrea re Tfm of Officer (e.g.. •Jana Doa, NoWY Pub kl personally appeared • Stephen R. Reid and G. Jack Becker Narrr(a) d SWW(q >0 personally known to me –OR –❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)j§;(are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that>betWihey executed the same in W~heif authorized capacity(ies), and that by {their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, • r. � ar executed the instrument. WITNESS myh4P4 and icial seal. slvaata. a Nary rwe OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, It may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Private Road and Drainage Facilities Maintenance Agreement Document Date: 7iil y 11 2000 Number of Pages: 6 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: steghen R. Reid ❑ Individual )U Corporate Officer Title(s): Senior Vive President • Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General • Attomey -in -Fact • Trustee • Guardian or Conservator a - • Other Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing Barratt American, Inc. a Delaware Corp. Signer's Name: G. Jack Becker ❑ Individual AZI Corporate Officer Title(s): Vice President • Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General • Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator a ❑ Other: Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing: Barratt American jnc. a Delaware Corp. 0 1994 National Notary Assodauon • 8336 Aammel Ave., P.D. Boa 7184 • Cam a Park, CA 91309.7tea Prod. No 5907 Aemdec Cell Td Free 1- 800878 -61327 ATTACHMENT "A" LOT 75 OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 94 -066 UNITS 4, 5, AND 6, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO, 13356, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996. EXHIBIT "B" THAT PRIVATE ROAD KNOWN AS LAUREN COURT AS DEPICTED ON FINAL MAP FOR CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -171, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THOSE PORTIONS OF LAND DESCRIBED AS "PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT' LYING WITHIN LOTS 10 AND 19 AS DEPICTED ON FINAL MAP FOR CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -171, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. :DV M: %0294\1 3 21Legal DescnptionsW08 132a08.doc WO 294132 6 /13/00 Recording Requested by: e fy Ea9. ,7 eel- When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue THr "RIGINAL OF THIS MCUOT ,f CORDED ON SEP 06, 2tYJ0 DUMT NUMBER 20(10- 0478445 GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECM All DIEGO MUNTY RECORDER'S UFFICE TH: 2:38 PM SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel No. 254 - 611 -07, 09, 10 Project No.: TM 98 -171 W.O. No.: 6038 FM A. Barratt American Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TM 98- 171 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of private improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required private improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter) , SUBDIVIDER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Exhibit B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. SUBDIVIDER agrees that SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due f financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys fees, from the otherparty. F. Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. G. Upon SUBDIVIDER's satisfactory completion of SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations contained herein, SUBDIVIDER may request and CITY shall execute a Satisfaction of Covenant. H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against SUBDIVIDER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: DEVEL � R Dated Dated (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached.) CITY OF ENCINITAS By: 8'21 -00 LU, rX4 Dated Alan D. Archibald Director of Engineering Services (Notarization not required) 1, CALIFORNIA ALL•PURPw._c ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of San Diego On July 11, 2000 ow before me, Kristina O'Connell, Notary Public Nrna wW 7168 of orkar (a.p. "Jana O3 NoWy Pubic') personally appeared • Stephen R. Reid and G. Jack Becker Nrw(a) d SVWIB) KXpersonally known to me –OR – ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) Ware subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that?(i0~hey executed the same in)MROW their authorized capactty(ies), and that by 411heir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. ar ... Lor-r,% + WITNESS my h o -I seal. L saa+l.a P1bro OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, It may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Covenant Rer.ardi na Real Pr perty Document Date: July 11, 2000 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capaclty(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: stenhen R- Reid ❑ Individual 2 Corporate Officer Title(s): Senior Vice President • Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General • Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ■ Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: Barratt American Inc a Delaware Corp RIG){T... ..PRINT ". • ° GF SIGNER' t' Number of Pages: 9 Signer's Name: c;- Tack Becker ❑ Individual NO Corporate Officer Title(s): Vice President ❑ Partner —❑ Limited ❑ General • Attomey -in -Fact • Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Other. Signer Is Representing: Barratt American, Inc a Delaware Corp nIG"T,,TMUMBRMNT. GF SIGNER:. sn 0 1994 National Notary ALwdadm • 8236 Aam l Aw., P.O. Box 7181 • Cuiop Part. CA 91309.7154 Prod. No. 5907 Rawdar. Car TWrw 14W"766677 ATTACHMENT A TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. PROJECT NO. TM 98 -171 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 75 OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 94-066 UNITS 4, 5 AND 6, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 13356, I= IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996. ATTACHMENT B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. PROJECT NO. TM 98 -171 SUBDIVIDER's DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS Name of SUBDIVIDER: Barratt Aaamerican Inc. Tract or Parcel Map Number TM 98 -171 Name of subdivision: Encinitas Ranch, North Mesa, Lower Resolution of Approval Number: PC 99 -07 Adopted: January 28, 1999 Estimated total cost of improvements: $462.770 1.0 IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED 1.1 SUBDIVIDER agrees at SUBDIVIDER's own cost and expense to furnish all the labor, equipment and materials to perform and complete, in accordance with the plans and specifications and to the satisfaction and approval of the City Engineer, all of the private improvements referred to below: Improvement plan drawing no. 6038 -G sheets 1 through 9 dated A -I ti -ZaaO and prepared by Hunsaker & Associates, as approved on l3 -Ite -7,OZV by the City Engineer together with any subsequent amendments approved in writing by the City Engineer on file with CITY in City Engineer's office and incorporated herein as though fully set forth at length. 1.2 Further, SUBDIVIDER agrees to perform the following conditions: Private Road And Utility Improvements Pursuant To PC 99 -07. 2.0 PROGRESS OF WORK 2.1 Time is of the essence with this Covenant. SUBDIVIDER shall commence substantial construction of the private improvements required by this Covenant no later than 11 -01 - 02 and shall complete the private improvements no later than '1 -0 1- C> In the event good cause exists, as determined by the City Engineer, the time for commencement of construction or completion of the private improvements hereunder may be extended. Any such extension may be granted without notice to SUBDIVIDER's Surety or Sureties, if any, and shall in no way affect the validity of this Covenant or release the Surety or Sureties on any security given f or the faithful performance of this Covenant. The City Engineer shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDER to an extension. As a condition of such extensions, the City Engineer may require SUBDIVIDER to furnish new security guaranteeing performa.:ce of this Covenant, as extended, in an increased amount as necessary to compensate for any increase in construction costs as determined by the City Engineer. 22 If any of the private improvements are to be constructed or installed on land not owned by SUBDIVIDER, no construction or installation shall be commenced prior to SUBDIVIDER demonstrating to CITY that SUBDIVIDER has acquired the appropriate property interests. 2.3 SUBDIVIDER shall, at SUBDIVIDER's expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction of the private improvements and give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law. 24 SUBDIVIDER shall notify the City Engineer in writing at least 15 days prior to the commencement of work hereunder. No construction work shall begin until authorized by CITY. 2.5 SUBDIVIDER shall not be entitled to obtain occupancy permits for the buildings constructed on any lot created by the subdivision until all required improvements have been provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2.6 SUBDIVIDER shall at all times maintain safe construction facilities, and provide safe access, for inspection CITY, to all parts of the work and to the shops wherein the work is in preparation. 2.7 SUBDIVIDER shall give good and adequate warning to the public to each and every existing danger relating to the construction of the private improvements, and shall protect the public from such dangers. 3.0 INSPECTION /APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS 31 The City Engineer or his duly authorized representative, upon request of SUBDIVIDER, shall inspect, at SUBDIVIDER's expense the private improvements herein agreed to be constructed and installed by SUBDIVIDER. If determined to be in accordance with applicable CITY standards and the other terms of this Covenant, the City Engineer shall approve the improvements. 3.2 SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay for each inspection of the improvements required by the City Engineer. 3.3 Approval of the private improvements by CITY, shall not constitute a waiver by CITY of any defects in the improvements. 3.4 Until such time as the private improvements required by this Covenant are fully completed by SUBDIVIDER and approved by the City Engineer. SUBDIVIDER will be responsible for the care, maintenance, repair and replacement of such private improvements. 4.0 HOLD HARMLESS 4.1 SUBDIVIDER agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees, and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands. causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of SUBDIVIDER or SUBDIVIDER's agents, employees, subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives. Upon demand, SUBDIVIDER shall, at its own expense, defend CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all such liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs. 4.2 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the plans, specifications and design of the private improvements; but does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of a defect in the plans, specifications or design that is a result of a change required by CITY to SUBDIVIDER's proposed plans, specifications or design so long as such change is objected to, in writing, by SUBDIVIDER, and the writing is filed with the City Engineer more than ten days prior to the commencement of work. 4.3 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the construction of the private improvements, alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the private improvements; alleged injury to persons or property; alleged inverse condemnation, of property or a consequence of the design, construction, or maintenance of the work or the private improvements; and any accident, loss or damage to the work or the private improvements prior to the approval of the construction of the private improvements by CITY. 4.4 By approving the improvement plans, specifications and design or by inspecting or approving the private improvements, CITY shall not have waived the protections afforded herein to CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents or diminished the obligation of SUBDIVIDER who shall remain obligated in the same degree to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless as provided above. 4.5 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action. losses, damages or costs that arise out of CITY's intentional wrongful acts, CITY's violations of law. or CITY's sole active negligence. 5.0 INSURANCE 5.1 SUBDIVIDER shall obtain and maintain a policy of motor vehicle liability, public liability, general liability and property damage insurance from an insurance company approved by CITY and authorized to do business in the State of California, in an insurable amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence. The insurance policy shall provide that the policy shall remain in force during the life of this COVENANT and shall not be cancelled, terminated, or allowed to expire without thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY from the insurance company. 5.2 CITY shall be named as an additional insured on SUBDIVIDER's policies. 5.3 SUBDIVIDER shall furnish certificates of said insurance to CITY prior to commencement of work under this AGREEMENT. 6.0 REPAIR, MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT As a condition on the approval by CITY of the satisfactory construction of the private improvements, SUBDIVIDER shall prepare, have executed. and record a covenant, in a form satisfactory to CITY, whereby property owners who will be served by the private improvements will be obligated to provide for the repair, maintenance and replacement of the private improvements and to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless. 7.0 NOTICES 7.1 Any notices to be given under this COVENANT, or otherwise, shall be served by certified mail. 7.2 For the purposes hereof, unless otherwise provided in writing by the parties hereto, the address of CITY and the proper person to receive any such notice on its behalf is: City Engineer City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 and the address of SUBDIVIDER and the proper person to receive any such notice on its behalf is: GXW-V Tr A "94z+u+.0 (' 4AocN 0%anxo 11-1Ter -esr > 2035 6&wm DEt� r STE . 1&0 fat- 4ASAOt 6-,A� °IZLiOq 8.0 SUBDIVIDER's CERTIFICATION OF AWARENESS OF IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT OF 1986 SUBDIVIDER certifies that SUBDIVIDER is aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (8 USC SS 1101 -1525) and will comply with these requirements, including but not limited to verifying the eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors and consultants that are included in, satisfy the duties and obligations contained herein. 9.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 9.1 Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of SUBDIVIDER's agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of CITY in connection with the performance of SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations under this Covenant. 9.2 Sale or other disposition of the PROPERTY will not relieve SUBDIVIDER from the duties and obligations set forth herein. 9.3 SUBDIVIDER shall provide the improvements as an independent contractor and in pursuit of SUBDIVIDER's independent calling, and not as an employee of CITY. SUBDIVIDER shall not be under control of CITY except as to the result to be accomplished. SUBDIVIDER may confer with CITY as required to perform this Covenant. 9.4 No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, official, agent or employee of CITY, either before, during or after the execution of this Covenant, shall effect or modify any of the terms or obligations herein contained. I Recording Requested by: ) City of Encinitas ) When Recorded Mail To: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas. CA 92024 ) TH' TGINAL OF THIS DMJMENT 4, �CORDED ON SEP 06, 2000 DODKNT HIM 2004-0478446 GREFi[b`tY J. SMITH, COIM RECORDER SAN DIEGO GWY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 2:38 PH SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY WAIVER OF PROTEST TO ASSESSMENTS Assessor's Parcel Number: 2594- (A- 01 , to 4.0g Project No. TM 98 -171 A. Barratt American Incorporated. A Delaware Corporation ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TM 98 -171, ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows: See Attachment "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of TM 98 -171 OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: No protest shall be made by the owners to any proceedings for the installation or acquisition of street improvements, including undergrounding of utility lines, under any special assessment 1911 or the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, or any other applicable state or local law, and whether processed by the City of Encinitas or any other governmental entity having jurisdiction in the matter and for the purposes of determining property owners support for same. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. waiver.doc cls 06/30/00(01- 11 -93) E. If either party is required to incurs costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the other party. F. Failure of the OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. G. Upon OWNER 's satisfaction of OWNER's duties and obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and CITY shall execute a "Satisfaction of Covenant ". H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. Dated 7 /llflcoo Dated /�/f -ew (Notarization of OWNER signature ATTACH NOTARY HERE C Dated g- 2% --[JCS by (Notarization not required) AE-an D. Archibald, Director of Engineering services waiver.doc cls 06/30/00(01- 11 -93) CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORIA ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO On July 11, 2000, before me, Kristina O'Connell , Notary Public, personally appeared Stephen R. Reid and G. Jack Becker personally known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. i KPASTTNA O'CONNELL, Notary Public THIS AREA FOR OFFICIAL NOTARIAL SEAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITIES CLAIMED BY SIGNERS F INDIVIDUAL X CORPORATE OFFICERS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT TITLE ial� (8 T:I. 6127[O7I: JULY 11, 2000 DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNERS ARE REPRESENTING: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY WAIVER OF PROTEST TO ASSESSMENTS TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ATTACHMENT "A" TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY PROJECT NO. TM 98 -171 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 75 OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 94-066 UNITS 4, 5 AND 6, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 13356, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996. waiver.doc cls 06/30/00(01- 11 -93) Recording Requested By: P— - 4IGINAL IF THIS DOD" 4CORDED ON SEP 06, 2000 DMIMEN1 NUMBER W- 0478447 GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER City Planner ) SAN DIEGO MTY RECTOR 3 OFFICE TIME: 2:38 PM When Recorded Mail To: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY FUTURE PARK, TRAFFIC, AND FLOOD CONTROL FEES Assessor's Parcel Number: 2.691, 4At c-r A o /e1 Project No. TM 98 -171 A. . Barratt American Incorporated, A Delaware Corporation ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TM 98 -171 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows: See Attachment "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of Final Map approval for the above referenced project by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment "B" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the other party. Covxxxxx F. Failure of the OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. G. Upon OWNER's satisfaction of OWNER's duties and obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and CITY shall execute a "Satisfaction of Covenant ". H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: Dated -7/d/2-0049 Dated 9—// I X Dated OWNERS A e � y (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached) CITY OF ENCINITAS Dated �?, /?- ZbWp by l ( L, t., (Notarization not required) Bill Weedman, City Planner CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORIA I I ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO I On July 11, 2000, before me, Kristina O'Connell , Notary Public, personally appeared Stephen R. Reid and G. Jack Becker personally known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. - / THIS AREA FOR OFFICIAL NOTARIAL SEAL STINA O'CONNELL, Notary Public Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITIES CLAIMED BY SIGNERS R X INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICERS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT TITLE a NUMBER OF PAGES JULY 11, 2000 DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNERS ARE REPRESENTING: DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY FUTURE PARK, TRAFFIC, AND FLOOD CONTROL FEES TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ATTACHMENT "A" TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY PROJECT NO. TM 9ft45W q 13 - 1 -7 1 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 75 OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 94-066 UNITS 4, 5 AND 6, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 13356, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 4,19%. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ATTACHMENT "B" TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY PROJECT NO. TM 88 -437 98-J-7 OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS A. In accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 23.98 in effect at time of fees being paid, park fees for the development shall be paid prior to Final Occupancy approval. B. In accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 23.94 in effect at time of fees being paid, traffic fees for the development shall be paid prior to Final Occupancy approval. C. In accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 23.96 in effect at time of fees being paid, flood control fees shall be assessed and collected during the building permit processing prior to the construction of any impervious surfaces. CITY OF ENCINITAS AGENDA REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Date: September 7, 2000 TO: Pla ' g Commission VIA: 1 ill Weedman, City Planner FROM: 70AIan Archibald, Director of Engineering Services _- -Masih Maher, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of the Final Map which conforms to Tentative Map No. 98 -171, located within the Lower North Mesa Planning area of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan. Applicant: Barratt American Incorporated. BACKGROUND: On January 28, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Encinitas approved, subject to conditions, Tentative Map No. 98 -171, creating a 19 lot master subdivision of approximately 20.4 acres comprised of 16 single family residential lots, one private road lot, one open space lot and one agricultural lot which includes a pad for a single family residence. The subject site is located on the west side of Quail Gardens Drive between Swallowtail and Leucadia Blvd. within the North Mesa Planning area of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan (Resolution No. PC 99 -07). See Attachment "A" for vicinity map and Attachment "B" for final map. The tentative map is scheduled to expire on January 28, 2002. The map submittal has been deemed a timely filing in accordance with Section 66463.5b of the Subdivision Map Act. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: An Environmental Initial Study was prepared in conjunction with the application, which determined that with incorporation of the mitigation measures set forth therein, the project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. A Mitigation, Monitoring and TCO AR98- 171.doc 08/29/00 Reporting Program was developed as part of the Initial Study and was included as a condition of approval. ANALYSIS: The map itself has been examined and found to be technically correct and in compliance with the Tentative Map, State laws and City ordinances. All conditions of approval have been complied with prior to the expiration date. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. Approve and accept on behalf of the public the easements for public road purposes over a portion of Lot 18 and the easement for public ingress, egress and public utilities over all of Lot 18. 2. Approve and accept on behalf of the public the easement for ingress and egress over portions of Lots 12 and 18, and the three foot easements for public access and public utility purposes as set forth on the map. 3. Approve and accept on behalf of the public the easements for open space over, upon, across, and under lots 1 through 6, 12, 17, and 19 and the easements for public landscape maintenance and visibility triangles as set forth on the map. 4. Approve the Final Map which conforms to Tentative Map No. 98 -171 and authorize the City Treasurer and the Secretary of the Planning Commission to sign the map. 5. Authorize the recordation of the Final Map which conforms to Tentative Map No. 98 -171 after the mandatory ten calendar day appeal period. TCO AR98 -171 doc 08/29/00 ATTACHMENT 'A' VICINITY MAP W A NOT TO SCALE 1 V TM 98 -171 ;yr�- c•»UMyt01irr_� MEMORANDUM TM 98 -171 DATE: 8/28/2000 T0: Director, Engineering Services Department FROM: Community Development Department SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval 254-611-07,09.10 (A.P.N.) North Mesa Lower, Encinitas Ranch (Address) Barratt American. Inc (Subdivider) Please be advised that the Community Development Department conditions of Approval for Recordation of a Final Map for Case No. TM 98 -171 required by Resolution No. PC- 99-07 have been satisfied. This tentative map expires on 1/28102 THIS MEMORANDUM MUST BE PROCESSED BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AND RETURNED TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. BPmemo.doc 08/28/00 Duane Thompson - Re: Barrett Issue Update age 1 From: Sandy Holder To: Alan Archibald, Diane Langager, Glenn Sabine, Kerry Miller, Leslie Suelter Date: 8/28/00 3 12P Subject: Re: Barrett Issue Update I requested Diane to sign off on Barratt's Final Map today based on the information in your e-mail. Engineering should be signing off today or tomorrow as well and the FM will then go to the Planning Commission on September 7th. Sandy >>> Leslie Suelter 08/24/00 05:1 1 PM >>> Pursuant to our meeting last week with Barratt, I have spoken further with Karen Scott, from Scott & Associates, and worked also with Engineering staff to try to identify the number acres that are potentially going to cause us some problem in terms of whether they are exempt from the tax. This is what I can report so far. 1) There are at least 21 acres of public street that were irrevocably offered when the master map was signed off in 1996. Some of these acres were exempted as part of the golf course or via other means. We tried to determine the exact acres over the phone and found that this was difficult because each of us were referring to different maps (parcel vs. master map). Ergo, Karen is coming into the office on Monday a.m. to meet with myself and Duane Thompson from Engineering to match the parcel maps to the master map and come up with the exact acres that are a problem. 2) 1 spoke with Paul Thimmig (firm of Quint & Thimmig). He is the bond counsel on the CFD bonds. He confirmed for me that Barrett's interpretation is correct and that we are in error by asking them to pre -pay tax on that piece of public acreage. Karen Scott and I will prepare a letter to go to Barrett on Monday that will retract Kerry's earlier letter. 3) Do we have a bigger problem with regard to adequate taxing ability as a result of this error? It is too early to answer this question. Until we know how many acres of land we are talking about, we cannot tell. So, once again, I will know more on Monday. As long as we have at least a 115% bond coverage, we are in the clear. If we don't have the 115 %, we could have a more serious problem. I will be calling Paul Thimmig back when we have a clearer picture about the acres. In the mean time, please call me if you have any questions. I understand from Diane that they are waiting to sign off on the final map until we have the letter from Kerry that will retract the requirement for prepayment- More to come.... CC: Duane Thompson, Nancy Sullivan c:\wi ndowsUEMMGM000013MP Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties (39AAE3D6.861 : 15 :34321) Subject: Re: Barrett Issue Update Creation Date: 8/28/00 3:12PM From: Sandy Holder Created By: SHOLDER @ci.encinitas.ca.us Recipients ci.encinitas.ca.us CIVIC.monks AARCH (Alan Archibald) DLangag (Diane Langager) DThompso CC (Duane Thompson) KMiller (Kerry Miller) LSUELTER (Leslie Suelter) NSULLI CC (Nancy Sullivan) mclex.com gsabine(Glenn Sabine) Post Office CIVIC.monl:s Files Size MESSAGE 3182 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed Subject: No Security: Standard Route ci.encinitas.ca.us mclex.com Date & Time 08/28/00 03:12PM ,INEERING SERVICES DEPAR K. IT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdvision Engineering Troffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( 91) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ 'L— 'j►Community Development- Current Plannine l O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: �Q,1P LG�1Q4q¢f- eeFF San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Plannine1Dr� Community Services – & BB,eaches DATE: /Parks n Regarding (Finance Number"' v'k o r ,MPOSITl ') TP ; RI (Finance Number POSIT/FEE W Q (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE APN J Transmitted as following: Final Map C] Final Map heck - Clhii Approved Copy / Original / New or vised Other Application: (Type) (Check) L_ C mments/Additional Space for Document; d ' (Staff/Consul /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if neede �' ✓�ai / 1 17j �/� s( Improvement Plan F1 Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised (Publi v t ) Rp d/ Drainage /Water /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) Intermediate Description: -- - - - - -- Gra lan Check �� Plan Change Description: eck Rrm /, Approved Copy / Original / New or evis$ ed j e ,q (Mas ou lim• ✓ (Eros' ontro anting & Irrigatio As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry [f Our Approval ❑ For your... Information ❑ Uses ❑ -7 Comment Signature ❑ /C,orrrrection q Please return "l' /4 `"y�� Please call: �.� / . if necessary Originator: P� Copies to: le 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG 1ARR/Inter Trws.doc/03.02.99 1 of 1 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 DATE: August 11, 2000 TRANSMITTAL FORM FAX: 633 -2818 Community Development Engineering Fire Administration Fire Prevention Public Works SENT VIA PICK UP TO: Mr. Rob D' Amaro Hunsaker & Associates 10179 Huennenkens Street, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 .•••���"` �OM: Diane Langager, Associate Planner PHONE: 760/633 -2714 ❑ Call ASAP ❑ Review & Call ❑ Review & Return ❑ F.Y.I. Please Handle 11 i Per Our Conversation ❑ Please Reply by�/MEl As Requested Rob: Enclosed please find the plan check set of plans which include review comments from the Community Development Department for the Final Landscape Plans (5") for the Lower North MesaBarratt Project/Case No. 98 -171. There are no further comments related to the recent submittal of the Final Map and revised sheets of the Grading & Improvement Plans; therefore they are not being returned. In addition to making the required plan revisions, as noted on the landscape plans and/or as addressed herein, the following is required prior to receiving Community Development Department approval: Plan Check Comments noted on the Final Landscape Plan check prints shall be addressed to ensure conformance with the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan. Primary concern relates to the entry sign. Approved project plans depicted a brass or brass -like placard. PC Subcommittee objects to the current proposal. Subcommittee noted acceptance with either a placard in bronze or brass consistent with the approval, or individual bronze or bronze -like channel letters consistent with the other Quail Ridge project. Pursuant to Section 30.60.070 of the Municipal Code only one identification sign for the development is permitted; the plans shall specify which street side the sign will be constructed. 2. As specified in the 8/4/00 letter from Kerry Miller (previously transmitted to you and Robert Laing of Barratt), the special tax in the amount of $137,679.08 shall be paid prior to final map approval or issuance of grading or other permit. DU. 030(8111/00)1 Fla 3. Cancellation of the Williamson Act Contracts shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map. The conditions for cancellation are identified in City Council Resolution No. 96- 13. Contact Patrick Murphy directly at 760 633 -2696 for further information. Please ensure to address all comments and notes included on the checkprints. Additionally, please ensure to return the checkprint sets with your revised plans. In an attempt to meet the 8/16/00 goal for issuing a grading permit, revised plans and required taxes shall be submitted by 8/15/00. 1 will be out of the office on Monday and Tuesday; I have set aside time first thing Wed. to review the revised landscape plans. If you have any questions or concerns in my absence please contact Bill Weedman, City Planner (633 - 2711); otherwise please feel free to call me (760 633 -2714) on Wed. DLE 030 (8/11/00) 2 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 DATE: August 1, 2000 TO: Mr. Rob D' Amaro Hunsaker & Associates 10179 Huennenkens Street, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 FROM Diane Langager, Associate Planner TRANSMITTAL FORM FAX: 633 -2818 Community Development Engineering Fire Administration Fire Prevention Public Works k1Q1l E11214t 409 PHONE: 760/633 -2714 ❑, C�allASAP ❑ Review &Call &Return ❑ F.Y.1. L7 Please Handle ❑ Per Our Conversation ,❑Review Ld Please Reply by ❑ As Requested Mf Enclosed please find the plan check set of plans which include review comments from the Community Development Department for 1) the Final Map (5 "), 2) the Grading & Private Improvement Plans (5") and 3) the Final Landscape Plans (4ih) for the Lower North MesaBarratt Project/Case No. 98 -171. In addition to making the required plan revisions, as noted on the project plans and/or as addressed herein, the following is required prior to receiving Community Development Department approval: Plan Check Comments noted on the Final Landscape Plan check prints shall be addressed to ensure conformance with the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan. Also said plans shall provide adequate information to ensure conformance with Condition SCJ. 2. The application and required information stipulated in Condition SC7 is being reviewed by Finance Director, Leslie Suelter for assignment of taxes related to public property with the said development. Final calculation is anticipated to be completed by Friday, 8/4/00. Required taxes shall be paid prior to final map approval and prior to grading permit issuance. 3. Cancellation of the Williamson Act Contracts shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map. The conditions for cancellation are identified in City Council Resolution No. 96- 13. Contact Patrick Murphy directly at 760 633 -2696 for further information. DLf. 026(8/2/00) 1 Please ensure to address all comments and notes included on the checkprints. Additionally, please ensure to return the checkprint sets with your revised plans. In an attempt to meet the 8/16100 goal for issuing a grading permit, revised plans and required taxes shall be submitted by 8/9/00. This will allow adequate time for staff review and any required response on your part. Please feel free to call (760 633 -2714) if you have any questions or want to discuss any issues in further detail DU. 026 (8/2/00) 2 i INEERING SERVICES DEPART. VT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Trolfic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (C1P) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ❑ Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) O Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ 2 ✓Community Development- Current Planning O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: San Diecuito Water District - Engineering & Planning Community Services- Parks & Beaches DATE: Regarding (Finance Numbe r�—ff--O— *,a- DEPOSIT/FEE TP P/MIN/DR: (Finance Number DEPOSIT /FEE 11 Q " (Finance Number ) DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff / Consul tant /CD/Fue /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): t (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/W ater /SewediraiVPark/Facility) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plao ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Grading Plan Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New o vised Plan Change Description: (Mass/Rough/Prelimi 4/• , (Erosion Contro ting &irrigation) (� / As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction ❑ Co ent Signature Z Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return Z S Please call: if necessary Originator: Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633 -2770 /FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARMnter Trws.doc/03.02.99 1 of 1 L INEERING SERVICES DEPART,. IT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (#1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ _T----'57-Community Development- Current Planning / O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION. /�eW d-a e� San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning DATE: Community Services - Parks & B cheers ^ M Regarding (Finance Numb DEPOSIT/ TPP/MIN/DR: er (Finance Number _� DEPOS '% " (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: �, /- ✓ Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New ((ti d C went /Ad i ional Spac6 for ocu ent: O � I i • (Staff/ Consul tant/CD/Fue/SD /OlvLn/LCWD) Sketch if needed): (*A'e G l /' s er /o`rrh l� �vh6 P"I fp,yu Z p•3 dtrr�t /y 8 /i /oo - Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint /Approved Copy /Original New or Revised (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage / Water /Sewerf rrai VPark/Faci lity) Intermediate Description: Grading Plan Check Plan Change Description: Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New Revised ( in /Precise) (Eros) ling & Irrigate ✓ As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction ❑ Comment Signature Information E] Uses _a Please return `3 Please call: if necessary Originator: 4eAk224 Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 I SG /ARR/Inter_Trans.doc/03.02.99 1 of I E/ JEERING SERVICES DEPARTM- INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ 1__775F�'- Communi[y Development- Curren[ Planning, O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: las4��Pi San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning Community Services - Parks &Beaches DATE: O%O Regarding (Finance Numbefl�631 DEPOSIT EE TP UP/MIN/DR: NC'2sc (Finance Number EPOSI E " Nor Pr „ (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Comments /Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff/Consultant /CD/Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): j iwl (Public/Private)r CJ (Road/Drainage /Water /Sewer/Trai VPark/Fac ility) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy I Original / New or Revised —- -- - - -- - - ------------------------ ----------- -- - - - - Grading Plan Check Checkprint /Approved Copy / Or' final / New o evised W� � Plan Change Description: (Mass/Rou Immary/Precise) (Erosion Co o lanting &Irrigation) zrJD, As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ld Our Approval ❑ For your... Corr ction p❑ Co ment p Signature ❑ q Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return �� G��+ V'AM •Please call: r��3 / if necessary Originator: Copies to: O 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633 - 2770 /FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/lnter_Trans.doc/03.02.99 1 of 1 I . sly CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 DATE: April 27, 2000 TO: Mr. Rob D' Amaro Hunsaker & Associates 10179 Huennenkens Street, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 /)d/ROM Diane Langager, Associate Planner ❑ Call ASAP ❑ Review & Call lJ Please Handle IJ Per Our Conversation M, .1 TRANSMITTAL FORM FAX: 633 -2818 Community Development Engineering Fire Administration Fire Prevention Public Works SENT VIA PICK UP ❑ Review &Return ❑ Please Reply by PHONE: 760/633-2714 ❑ F.Y.I. ❑ As Requested Enclosed please find the plan check set of plans which include review comments from the Community Development Department for 1) the Final Map, 2) the Grading & Private Improvement Plans and 3) the Final Landscape Plans for the Lower North Mesa/Barratt Project/Case No. 98 -171. In addition to making the required plan revisions, as noted on the project plans and/or as addressed herein, the following is required prior to receiving Community Development Department approval: An exhibit needs to be prepared for incorporation into the CC &R's which identifies and clearly depicts where the common maintenance areas are located. The Community Development Department needs to be ensured that the common areas /open space /perimeter slopes will be maintained by the HOA. 2. Plan Check Comments noted on the Final Landscape Plan check prints shall be addressed to ensure conformance with the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan. Also said plans shall provide adequate information to ensure conformance with Conditions SCI, SCJ, SCL, SCT, and SU L 3. Condition H1 — An Affordable Fair Housing Marketing Plan shall be provided, or evidence shall be provided that the developer/builder (Barratt American) is a Voluntary Affirmative Marketing Agreement (VAMA) signatory and has paid the required per unit fee for VAMA DLr: 016(4/27/00)1 administration. The evidence documenting that the developer is a VAMA signatory shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department 4. An application and required information stipulated in Condition SC7 shall be submitted to the Finance Director, Leslie Suelter for assignment of tax exempt status for public property, property owner association property, and affordable housing property with the said development. Processing of the information shall be completed prior to final map approval. 5. Annexation to the Olivenhain Municipal Water District shall be completed prior to final map approval in conformance with Condition SCZ5e. Please note this also includes deannexation from the San Dieguito Water District. Bill O'Donnell, Water Utility Planner, shall be contacted at the District (760) 633 -1849 to initiate the deannexation process. 6. Open Space wording shall be modified on the final map to include Lot 12 in conformance with the approved Tentative Map. 7. In addition to items referenced above, evidence shall be submitted documenting to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director conformance with the following conditions of Resolution No. PC 99 -07: SCX, and M6. To conform with Cond. SCX & SCZ please confirm which lots will be providing the accessory units. A covenant for recordation will be prepared to set forth income and rent limitiations. Pursuant to the Affordable Housing Compliance Plan (Amended August 24, 1999) 2 accessory units shall be provided at the Very Low Income Levee Street names shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering and Fire Department. 9. Cancellation of the Williamson Act Contracts shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map. The conditions for cancellation are identified in City Council Resolution No. 96- 13. Contact Patrick Murphy directly at 760 633 -2696 for further information Please ensure to address all comments and notes included on the checkprints. Additionally, please ensure to return the checkprint sets with your revised plans. Feel free to call (760 633 -2714) if you have any questions or want to discuss any issues in further detail DU: 016(4127/00)2 E. INEERINC SERVICES DEPARTA. T INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ® Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director (k 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development- Current Planning p 1 (I O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: 17t UV e e -AM0-v� San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning �5 Community Services - Parks & Beaches DATE: Regarding (Finance Number 60 37 DEPOSIT/10 TP1 P/MINMR: (Finance Number 603'9 -6,L )DEPOSIT t�oi. (Finance Number - _) DEPOSIT/FEE APN: +"'0Q 1 Transmitted as following: Other Application: �F Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map C5T Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / ew r Revised Comments/A tonal Space for ocument: M Q ( Staff /Consulmnt/CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LC WD Sketch (if needed): Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/ Water /Sewer/I'rai i/Park/Fac i l ity) — — — - -- — Intermediate Description: Grading Plan ✓ Ckeck Plan Change Description: Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / e or Revised (Massirel iminary/Precise) ton lanting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval For your... Correction ❑ Comment ® Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return /n 2 wee % 5 Please call. -- 2-'7-q -51 if necessary Originator: i o Copies to: le i 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92020 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770AFAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG/ARR/Inta_Trans.dod03.02.99 I of I 1- CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 920243633 DATE: August 31, 1999 TO: Mr. Ray Martin Hunsaker & Associates 10179 Huennenkens Street, Suite 200 Diego, CA 92121 J M: ',�j)f OM Y000 Diane Langager, Associate Planner ❑ Call ASAP ❑ Review & Call 0a Please Handle ❑ Per Our Conversation Ray: TRANSMITTAL FORM FAX: 633 -2818 Community Development Engineering Fire Administration Fire Prevention Public Works SENT VIA MAIL ❑ Review &Return ❑ Please Reply by PHONE: 760/633 -2714 ❑ As Requested Enclosed please find the plan check set of plans which include review comments from the Community Development Departmnet for the Final Map and the Grading & Private Improvement Plans for the Lower North MesaBarratt Project. In addition to making the required plan revisions, as noted on the project plans and/or as addressed herein, the following is required prior to receiving Community Development Department approval: The Covenant Regarding Real Property (enclosed herein), as required by Condition G4 and to satisfy Condition SCZ# shall be signed and notarized. The required recording fee of $113.00 shall be submitted in the form of a check made out to the County Recorder. 2. An exhibit needs to be prepared for incorporation into the CC &R's which identifies and clearly depicts where the common maintenance areas are located. The Community Development Department needs to be ensured that the common areas/open space /perimeter slopes will be maintained by the HOA. 3. A Final Landscape Plan depicting in conformance with the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan shall be submitted for review and approval. Said plan shall depict the required bio buffer and fire suppression areas. Also said plans shall provide adequate information to ensure conformance with Conditions SCI, SCJ, SCL, SCT, and SCZ 1. 4. Condition H1 — An Affordable Fair Housing Marketing Plan shall be provided, or evidence shall be provided that the developer/builder (Barratt American) is a Voluntary Affirmative Marketing Agreement (VAMA) signatory and has paid the required per unit fee for VAMA administration. The evidence documenting that the developer is a VAMA signatory shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department 5. An application and required information stipulated in Condition SC7 shall be submitted to the Finance Director, Leslie Suelter for assignment of tax exempt status for public property, property owner association property, and affordable housing property with the said development. Processing of the information shall be completed prior to final map approval. 6. Annexation to the Olivenhain Municipal Water District shall be completed prior to final map approval in conformance with Condition SCZ5e. 7. Open Space wording shall be added to the final map (see attached wording). 8. In addition to items referenced above, evidence shall be submitted documenting to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director conformance with the following conditions of Resolution No. PC 99 -07: SCX, and M6. .re! `_ �a-{ -� . 9�2- Fc�r��, �j�,ec�� %tom �✓�rc� �m.r 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC 99 -07 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP, DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A 19 LOT SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 20.4 ACRES TO INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION OF 16 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, GRADING, LANDSCAPING, NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRY, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE BETWEEN SWALLOWTAIL ROAD AND LEUCADIA BOULEVARD, WITHIN THE NORTH MESA PLANNING AREA OF THE ENCMTAS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (CASE NO. 98 -171 TM/DR/CDP/EIA; APN: 254-611-07,09, & 10) WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Tentative Map, a Design Review Permit and a Coastal Development Permit was filed by Cornerstone Communities to allow a 19 lot subdivision of approximately 20.4 acres comprised of 16 single family residential lots, one private road lot, one open space lot, and one agricultural lot which includes a pad for a single family residence; and to allow the construction of 16 single family residences, associated grading, landscaping, neighborhood entry, and a temporary construction trailer, in accordance with Title 24 (Subdivisions), Chapter 23.08 (Design Review), and Chapter 30.80 (Coastal Development Permits) of the Encinitas Municipal Code, for the property located in the ER -SFR3 zone of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan, legally described as: Lot 75 of the City of Encinitas Tract No. 94 -066 Units 4, 5 and 6, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Map thereof No. 13356, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, September4, 1996. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing on the application on January 28, 1999, at which time all those desiring to be heard were heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered, without limitation: The January 28, 1999 agenda report to the Planning Commission with attachments; The General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Municipal Code, Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan, and associated Land Use Maps; Oral evidence submitted at the hearing; cd/Dt./RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)1 (0638 -)W ST- / AL 4. Written evidence submitted at the hearing; 5. Project plans consisting of 33 sheets total, including two sheets showing the Tentative Map, dated received by the City of Encinitas on January 15, 1999, two sheets showing the Design Review Permit Site Plan, dated received by the City of Encinitas on January 15, 1999, 27 sheets showing the floor plans and building elevations, dated received by the City of Encinitas on October 12, 1998, one sheet showing the Temporary Construction Trailer Site Plan, dated received by the City of Encinitas on January 15, 1999, one sheet showing the Landscape Plan, dated received by the City of Encinitas on January 19, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings pursuant to Title 24 (Subdivisions), Chapter 23.08 (Design Review), and Chapter 30.80 (Coastal Development Permits) of the Encinitas Municipal Code: (SEE ATTACHMENT "A ") NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Encinitas hereby approves application 98 -171 TM/DR/CDP/EIA subject to the following conditions: (SEE ATTACHMENT "B ") BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission, in its independent judgment, has reviewed the Environmental Initial Study prepared for the project, which is based on the Program Final Environmental Impact Report for the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan, and has determined that with incorporation of the mitigation measures contained therein and made conditions of approval for the application herein, all project impacts will be reduced to levels of insignificance and the Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby adopted in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). cd/DURPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)2 Job PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28' day of January 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Jacobson, Bagg, Patton and Grossman NAYS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Alice Jacobsot,Fhair of the Encinitas Planning Commission 0§0619 CL6.,.- Sandra Holder Secretary NOTE: This action is subject to Chapter 1.04 of the Municipal Code, which specifies time limits for legal challenges. cd/DLAW98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)3 ATTACHMENT "A" Resolution No. PC 99 -07 Case No. 98 -171 TM/DR/CDP/EIA FINDINGS FOR A TENTATIVE MAP STANDARD: Section 66474 of the California Government Code requires that the authorized agency approve an application for a Tentative Map unless, based upon the information presented in the application and during the Public Hearing, the authorized agency makes any of the following findings of fact: a. That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451 of the Subdivision Map Act. Facts: The proposed Tentative Map is to allow the subdivision of approximately 20.4 acres into 19 lots comprised of 16 single family residential lots (Lots 1 -16), one private road lot (Lot 18), one open space natural and manufactured lot (Lot 19) and one agricultural lot which includes a pad for a single family residence (Lot 17). The subject site is located within the North Mesa Planning Area of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan (ERSP). The provisions of the North Mesa Planning Area of the ERSP stipulate that a maximum of 18 dwelling units shall be permitted at a maximum density of 3.0 du/ac for the area designated as residential on the subject site. Additionally, provisions of the North Mesa Planning Area provide that a 10 acre site is zoned for agriculture, a portion of which will be subject to a recorded open space restriction. The development standards of the Agricultural Zone of the ERSP allows for one single family detached dwelling unit per ten acres. Discussion: The 16 single family residences and the agricultural lot conform with the provisions of the North Mesa Planning Area of the ERSP and the Encinitas Ranch Land Use Plan Summary (Table 3 -1). Development of a pad for the future construction of a single family residence on the agriculture lot (Lot 17), conforms with the development standards of the Agricultural Zone of the ERSP which allows one single family detached dwelling unit per ten acres. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the General Plan and ERSP subject to the required specific and standard conditions contained in the approved resolution. b. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Facts: Chapter 24.12 of the Municipal Code sets forth design standards for subdivisions; and Section 6.5.3 of the ERSP sets forth technical standards. such as lot width and depth requirements for the ER -SFR3 zone in which the site is located. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)4 Additional criteria for the development in the Quail Hollow East Planning Area is established in Section 3.3.3 of the ERSP. Suspension of design requirements can be authorized pursuant to Section 24.12.020 of the Municipal Code if it can be found that special circumstances or conditions affect the property and that such suspension will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the immediate vicinity. Additionally, Section 3.3.3A of the ERSP states that waivers from typical City Standards in lot shape, road widths, lighting, and related features may be provided under the Design Review, Major Use Permit, Planned Residential Development and Tentative Map processes. Pursuant to Sections 24.29.02013 and D of the Municipal Code, private streets are not permitted when accessing 11 or more lots unless the map is approved as a Planned Residential Development (PRD) consistent with development standards established by Municipal Code Section 30.16.020B. However, ERSP Section 3.3.2.C.I states that building and development standards for road widths may vary to encourage a "quasi -rural environment" within the North Mesa Planning Area Discussion: The 16 residential lots are proposed with net acreage ranging from 11,640 to 22,997, which conforms with the minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet required pursuant to the ER -SFR3. The lot widths and depths (except for Lots 3 and 4 as discussed below) conform with the standards for the ER -SFR3 zone, which requires a minimum lot width of 70 feet, a minimum cul -de -sac lot width of 25 feet and a minimum lot depth of 100 feet. Pursuant to the ERSP, lot width in the ER- SFR3 zone is measured at the front yard setback. Lots 3 and 4 conform with the minimum cul -de -sac lot width, however they are located at a street knuckle which is not a true cul -de -sac. Given the street design and project lay -out, as depicted in an exhibit submitted by the applicant, a flag lot would be necessary on Lot 4 in order for Lots 3 and 4 to conform with the standard 70 foot lot width. In review of the two options, utilization of the cul -de -sac lot width was determined to be a better design solution rather than a flag lot design. In this instance, the application of the cul -de- sac lot widths, rather than the standard lot width, for lots located at a street knuckle are authorized to avoid the use of a flag lot. Access is provided to the lots and all other design standards are met for the lots. There is no evidence available to show that suspension of the standard lot width for Lots 3 and 4 would be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the immediate vicinity. The agricultural lot conforms with the minimum 10 acre lot size required within the Agricultural Zone development standards of the ERSP in which that portion of the property is located. There are no requirements for lot width or depth within the agricultural zone. The 10 acre lot is comprised of pad area and open space easement area. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (22/99 - Final)5 The perimeter of the area proposed for development (graded pads) is surrounded by a 30 foot biological buffer which is also combined with a fire fuel modification zone. The 30 foot biological buffer is proposed in conformance with Section 3.3.3C.10 of the ERSP. Although the project is not proposed as a PRD, it is determined that the private road may be authorized for the project since the project is located within the ERSP which is similar to a PRD. The PRD open space minimum requirement of 40% which equates to a minimum of 6,205 square feet (365 square feet per unit) of developed open space for the subject project is met through the dedication of the Encinitas Ranch Golf Course, provision of recreational trails throughout the Specific Plan area, dedication and construction of Green Valley Park, and the future purchase of off -site land for recreational resources (Indianhead Canyon). The amount of dedicated open space for recreational and environmental purposes for the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan exceeds the 40% requirement. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that, with the utilization of the cul- de -sac lot width in lieu of the standard lot width requirement for Lots 3 and 4 , and with the allowance for the private road as part of the project, the proposed subdivision conforms to the General Plan since all technical requirements are pursuant to the City's Subdivision Ordinance and the ERSP. C. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development. Facts: The Tentative Map proposes to provide lot sizes that conform to provisions of the ER -SFR3 and Agricultural zone of the ERSP. The Tentative Map indicates the conceptual grading to create future building pads which will adequately accommodate single family residences and the future agricultural uses. An Environmental Initial Study was prepared for the project which determined that with mitigation measures the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Discussion: The perimeter of the proposed development is in substantial conformance with the area delineated for development within the North Mesa Planning Area of the ERSP. The residential portion of the site will be graded into a single, relatively flat pad. The agricultural lot will be graded to provide a pad for future greenhouses, agricultural buildings and a pad for a future single family residence. As graded, the agricultural lot will be slightly lower in elevation from the residential portion of the site by approximately 3 — 5 feet. Earthwork for the project will involve 44,000 cubic yards of cut, and 16,000 cubic yards of fill, with 28,000 cubic yards of export. The bank along lots 1 — 6 will be contour graded in conformance with the ERSP FEIR. Given grading constraints, in lieu of contour grading, the existing manufactured slope located in the open space lot 19 will be revegetated with native drought tolerant and fire resistant species. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (22/99 - Final)6 The site constraints have been addressed within the project design which include a 87,100 square foot oe-n space lot, open space easements on individual lots, a 30 foot biological buffer adjacent to natural open space, and a 75 foot fire fuel modification area. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the site is physically suitable to accommodate the development of 16 single family residences and the future development of the agricultural lot, and that the subdivision is designed, or has been conditioned, to comply with Municipal Code and ERSP development standards. d. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Facts: The provisions of the North Mesa Planning Area of the ERSP stipulate that a maximum of 18 units shall be permitted at a maximum density of 3.0 du/ac for the residential portion of the site. Additionally, provisions of the North Mesa Planning Area provide that a 10 acre site is zoned for agriculture, a portion of which will be subject to a recorded open space restriction. The 16 single family residences and the agricultural lot conform with the provisions of the North Mesa Planning Area of the ERSP and the Encinitas Ranch Land Use Plan Summary (Table 3 -1). Development of a pad for the future construction of a single family residence on the agriculture lot (Lot 17), conforms with the development standards of the Agricultural Zone of the ERSP which allows one single family detached dwelling unit per ten acres. A Design Review Permit Site Plan was also submitted as part of the project application which depicts the proposed siting of 16 homes on the subject lots and resulting graded pads. Discussion: The project density, in addition to being within the allowable range for the North Mesa Planning Area, the ER -SFR3 zone and the Agricultural zone, is suitable since project design indicates that the allowed single family homes can be accommodated on the resulting graded pads and conform to the setback requirements of the ER -SFR3 zone. Building setbacks for conformance with bio buffers and fire fuel modification zones are depicted on the agricultural lot. Sufficient area is still maintained within the allowed building envelope for structures and uses on the site. The future development on the agricultural lot will be subject to review of development standards as part of the coastal development permit process. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the Tentative Map conforms to the density requirements for the North Mesa Planning Area, ER -SFR3 zone and the Agricultural Zone of the ERSP and project design indicates that adequate building envelopes will result for the single family detached development and future development of the agricultural lot, therefore the site is physically suitable for the proposed density. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (22/99 - Final)7 e. That the design of the subdivision or the 1— oposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Facts: An Environmental Initial Study, based on the Program Final Environmental Impact Report for the ERSP, was completed for the project by the City's Environmental Consultant, Curtis Scott Engelhorn and Associates. Discussion: The Initial Study concluded that with implementation of mitigation measures recommended therein and made conditions of this approval, the project would not result in any significant adverse impacts to the environment. A Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program was developed as part of the Initial Study and has been included as a condition of approval. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that with incorporation of the mitigation measures set forth in the Environmental Initial Study, the project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. f That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems. Facts: The applicant has submitted "will service" letters to indicate that the Water, Sewer, Fire and School agencies can provide adequate service and utilities to the project site. Although both School Districts note that the project will result in the overcrowding of schools, the project is eligible for service. The San Dieguito Union High School District notes that fees /assessments will be levied in accordance with CFD 94 -3 and the Encinitas Union School District notes that fees will be levied in accordance with the Encinitas Ranch Impact Fee and Mitigation Agreement between the developer of Encinitas Ranch and the Encinitas Union School District. Discussion: To more efficiently provide water service to the site, the project is conditioned whereby a portion of the property shall detach from the San Dieguito Water District and annex to the Olivenhain Municipal Water District. No evidence has been submitted to indicate that a serious public health problem would occur should the Tentative Map be recorded and future residences be constructed. Conclusion: Therefore, the Planning Commission finds that the design of the subdivision can be adequately serviced with necessary utilities and the project will not cause any serious public health problems. g. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the authorized agency may cd/DURPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)8 approve a map if it finds that alternate easements, for access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acqu::ed by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Facts: The Tentative Map indicates that adequate access to each of the residential lots can be provided in conformance with City standards. All other known easements for utilities or access are indicated on the Tentative Map and will remain or be relocated for access to public utilities. Discussion: The design of the Tentative Map will not conflict with any easements for utilities or roadways. The Tentative Map has been conditioned to require all access easements and utilities to be shown on the Final Map in accordance with City standards and the servicing utilities' requirements. Conclusion: Therefore, the Planning Commission finds that the design of the subdivision and future improvements will not conflict with any public easements nor hinder access to, or the use of, property within the proposed subdivision. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (212/99 - Final)9 FINDINGS FOR DESIGN REVIEW STANDARD: Section 23.08.072 of the Encinitas Municipal Code provides that an application for a design review permit must be granted unless, based upon the information presented in the application and during the Public Hearing, the authorized agency makes any of the following regulatory conclusions: a. The project design is inconsistent with the General Plan, a Specific Plan, or the provisions of the Municipal Code. Facts: The project is located within the North Mesa Planning Area, the ER -SFR3 zone, and the Agricultural Zone of the ERSP. The Design Review Permit is requested for the proposed construction of 16 single family residences, proposed grading associated with the development including grading for the future development of the agricultural lot, proposed landscaping for the subdivision and the neighborhood entry including an identification sign. Discussion: The project is conditioned to ensure that a courtyard fence located within the front yard setback conforms with fence height standards. Lots 1 and 16 are both comer lots and propose interior side yard setbacks of 5 feet as opposed to the standard 10 foot interior side yard setback. Footnote 46 of the ER -SFR3 Zone Development Standards Matrix (ERSP Section 6.5.3B) stipulates that a 50% reduction in either street side yard or interior side yard may be allowed in the Design Review process for single story residences located on comer lots of not less than 8,000 square feet in size. However a 5 foot minimum interior side yard setback shall be maintained. Lots 1 and 16 conform with this criteria and the five foot interior side yard setback is authorized herein. Based on review of the Design Review Site Plan, the Building Plans, and the Building Coverage Summary, and with the allowance for a five foot setback on lots 1 and 16, the 16 single family residences, as proposed or otherwise conditioned, conform with the development standards of the ER -SFR3 zone and the Municipal Code. The 7.5 square foot sign conforms with Section 30.60.070H of the Municipal Code which allows for one identification sign for residential dvelopments of 5 or more units at a maximum of 32 square feet. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that with the allowance for a five foot setback on lots I and 16, the project design is consistent with the General Plan, the ERSP and the provisions of the Municipal Code. b. The project design is substantially inconsistent with the Design Review Guidelines. Facts: Design Review of the proposed residences, grading, landscaping, and neighborhood entry is included as part of the project. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (22/99 - Final) 10 The project proposes five different floor plans (Plans 1 -5) with three different elevations proposed for Plans 1 and 2, two afferent elevations proposed for Plan 4 and four different elevations proposed for Plans 3 and 5. The five plan types are proposed at approximately 3119, 3700, 4260, 4962, and 5415 square feet respectively. Plan 1 is a single story structure, and Plans 2 -5 are two story structures. The elevation styles are proposed in Santa Barbara, Craftsman and Mediterranean. Nine color /material schemes are proposed for the project which utilize a range of subtle earth tone hues in beige, brown, green, taupe, gold and grey with other accent colors. In keeping with the design styles, the Santa Barbara and Mediterranean elevations are proposed with stucco siding and barrel tile roofs, while the Craftsman elevations are proposed with a combination of stucco and wood -like siding and flat tile roofs. The wood -like siding will utilize a material (Hardi -board) accepted by the Fire Department whereby it can wrap around to all sides as desired. The wood -like siding will be in plank and shingle form depending on the elevation. The Craftsman elevations will also utilize decorative treatments of either river rock, brick or ledgerstone. The project proposes landscape treatments for 1) an enhanced neighborhood entry into the residential development including center median; 2) the perimeter slopes adjacent to Quail Gardens Drive; 3) rear yard slopes of Lots 1 — 12; 4) interior street trees; and 5) a center cul -de -sac planter. The neighborhood entry proposes a mixture of accent trees, specimen palms, and hedges. Entry pilasters and walls are proposed utilizing tumbled brick with grey concrete caps interspersed with the hedges. A palette of trees, shrubs and groundcovers are proposed for the perimeter slopes, street and center median within the project site. One identification sign is proposed on the north side of the entry. The entry sign is proposed to be located on the low entry wall and is proposed as a brass or brass like placard with dimensions of approximately 1.5' x 5'. Three fence types are proposed in the project, the low wall (split block base with tubular steel), perimeter wall (split block) and wood fence. For compatibility, the walls will utilize the same split block. The tubular steel and wood fence will be painted a dark brown to complement the darker brown tone block. Discussion: The project substantially conforms to site, building, landscape and privacy design standards. Existing natural open space is maintained as part of the subdivision. Natural open space buffers, and fire mitigation buffers are proposed in areas adjacent to the natural open space areas as applicable. The bank along lots 1 — 6 will be contour graded in conformance with the ERSP FEIR. Given grading constraints, in lieu of contour grading, the existing manufactured slope located in the open space lot 19 will be revegetated with native drought tolerant and fire resistant species. Views from the site are taken advantage of with the lot layout and with the use of tubular steel fencing at the rear of the view lots. The project design offers interest and variation through the use of 3 architectural styles, five floor plans and varying elevation facades for each plan. Different design cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)l I features such as materials, rooflines, windows (sizes. shapes, placement, mullions, shutter and awnings), column and chimney treatments, and different railing styles all work to give each home a different appearance. With the number of floor plans and elevations proposed for the project, the same plan/elevation type is never repeated and no same plan is located side by side. Diversity is further enabled within the project given that 9 color schemes are proposed. The actual colors within in each scheme may be applied in any given manner to the individual residences, i.e. colors are not denoted specifically for stucco, siding or trim. Color schemes have been selected for each residence, and, as proposed, no one color scheme is repeated on adjacent homes nor directly across the street; which also adds to the design variety and interest throughout the site. The use of a low brick wall at the neighborhood entry combined with hedges offers interest and variety to the entry while still maintaining a residential character. The sign is minimal in size and is integrated into the entry walls. The majority of plantings proposed on the Landscape Concept plan are drought tolerant. The majority of the species listed on the plant palette for the project Landscape Plan includes plantings from the Master Plant List or those listed in Section 7.5.3I of the ERSP. However, there are some species proposed on the project plant palette which are not included on either list. Variation from the Master Plant List of the ERSP Plant List is acceptable, since Section 7.5.3I of the ERSP notes that additional plant materials should also be considered as appropriate. The palette conforms with the intent of the ERSP Landscape Design Guidelines (ERSP Section 7.5.3I) in that the plant palette offers enough species for diversity, while at the same time, it is limited in primary plant materials which will provide unity and thematic identity to the entries and street scene. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the project design is substantially consistent with the Design Review Guidelines. C. The project would adversely affect the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Facts: An Environmental Initial Study, based on the Program Final Environmental Impact Report for the ERSP, was completed for the project by the City's Environmental Consultant, Curtis Scott Engelhom and Associates. The Initial Study concluded that with implementation of mitigation measures recommended therein and made conditions of this approval, the project would not result in any significant adverse impacts to the environment. A Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program was developed as part of the Initial Study and has been included as a condition of approval. The applicant has submitted "will service" letters to indicate that the Water, Sewer, Fire and School agencies can provide adequate service and utilities to the project site. cd/DL /RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final) 12 Discussia.i: No aspect of the use has been identified which would have any significant adverse effect on the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the project will not adversely affect the health safety, or general welfare of the community. d. The project would cause the surrounding neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or value. Discussion: No evidence has been submitted which shows that the proposed development will cause material depreciation to the appearance or value of the surrounding neighborhood. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that the project will not cause the surrounding neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or value. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (22/99 - Final) 13 FINDINGS FOR A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT STANDARD: Section 30.80.090 of the Municipal Code provides that the authorized agency must make the following findings of fact, based upon the information presented in the application and during the Public Hearing, in order to approve a coastal development permit: The project is consistent with the certified Local Coastal Program of the City of Encinitas; and 2. The proposed development conforms with Public Resources Code Section 21000 and following (CEQA) in that there are no feasible mitigation measures or feasible alternatives available which would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact that the activity may have on the environment; and 3. For projects involving development between the sea or other body of water and the nearest public road, approval shall include a specific finding that such development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Section 30200 et. seq. of the Coastal Act. Facts: The Coastal Development Permit is requested for the subject project relative to the proposed subdivision of 20.4 acres into 19 lots, grading, the construction of 16 single family residential homes and associated improvements, and the proposed temporary construction trailer. An Environmental Initial Study was completed for the project by the City's Environmental Consultant, Curtis Scott Engelhom and Associates. Chapter 30.46 of the Municipal Code, related to Temporary Use Regulations, is incorporated by reference into the Specific Plan. Pursuant to Section 30.46.110 of the Municipal Code, the temporary use of a trailer coach as a construction office is permitted on, or adjacent to any site on which a building or construction project is being diligently prosecuted. A Coastal Development Permit is required for the temporary use of a trailer coach pursuant to Section 30.46.100 of the Municipal Code. Discussion: Related to Finding No. 1, the ERSP expressly allows for single family residential homes within the North Mesa Planning Area and the ER -SFR3 zone. Additionally, within the provisions of the North Mesa Planning Area and the standards of the Agricultural Zone of the ERSP, agricultural uses and one single family residence are expressly permitted in the area of the proposed agricultural lot. The project conforms or is conditioned to conform with density and development standards of the ER -SFR3 zone, the Agricultural Zone and the Municipal Code. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final) 14 The proposed construction trailer is located out of the right -of -way and it does not appear that it will disturb on -site construction activities and/or X--site uses. In conformance with Section 30.46.110 of the Municipal Code, the trailer coach shall be removed from the site prior to the final occupancy approval for the last residential unit within the project. Related to Finding No. 2, the Environmental Initial Study concluded that with implementation of mitigation measures recommended therein and made conditions of this approval, the project would not result in any significant adverse impacts to the environment. A Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program was developed as part of the Initial Study and has been included as a condition of approval. Related to Finding No. 3, the subject site is located on the west side of Quail Gardens Drive between Swallowtail Road and Leucadia Boulevard which is not between the sea or other body of water and the nearest public road. therefore Finding No. 3 is not applicable to the subject project. Conclusion: The Planning Commission finds that 1) the project is consistent with the certified Local Coastal program of the City of Encinitas; 2) that feasible mitigation measures will be implemented as required with the project which will substantially lessen any significant adverse impact that the activity may have on the environment; and 3) Finding No. 3 is not applicable to the project since the project is not located between the sea or other body of water and the nearest public road. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (22/99 - Final)] 5 SCl ATTACHMENT "B" Resolution No. PC 99 -07 Project No.: 98 -171 TM/DR/CDP /EIA Applicant: Cornerstone Communities Location: West side of Quail Gardens Drive between Swallowtail Road and Leucadia Boulevard; North Mesa Planning Area of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: �C3 val of the Tentative Map and all associated permits will expire on January 28, / 00 5:00 pm, three years after the approval of this project, unless the conditions ave been met or an extension of time has been approved pursuant to the provisions of the State Map Act, the Municipal Code, and the Encinitas Ranch Development Agreement. 1 5 This project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application and project plans consisting of 33 sheets total, including two sheets showing the Tentative Map, dated received by the City of Encinitas on January 15, 1999, two sheets showing the Design Review Permit Site Plan, dated received by the City of Encinitas on January 15, 1999, 27 sheets showing the floor plans and building elevations, dated received by the City of Encinitas on October 12. 1998, one sheet showing the Temporary Construction Trailer Site Plan, dated received by the City of Encinitas on January 15, 1999, one sheet showing the Landscape Plan, dated received by the City of Encinitas on January 19, 19998; all designated as approved by the Planning Commission on January 28, 1999, and shall not be altered without express authorization by the Community Development Department or the Encinitas Ranch Planning Commission Subcommittee. SC7 Encinitas Ranch Community Facilities District No. I / Under Section "E" of the "Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes for City of Encinitas Community Facilities District No. 1 (Encinitas Ranch Public Improvements) ", the City shall exempt from the Special Tax up to a total of 445.4 acres of Property Owner Association Property and Public Property. The City shall also exempt from the Special Tax up to a total of 75 dwelling units located on up to 3.5 acres of Affordable Housing Property. The City Manager determines tax exempt status and irrevocably assigns tax exemptions in the chronological order in which property is designated Public Property, Property Owner Association Property, or Affordable Housing Property. Property that is designated Public Property or Property Owner Association cd/DL./RPC98171.907 (212/99 - Final) 16 Property after the 445.4 acre threshold has been met, and property that is designated Affordable Housing .Property after the 75 dwelling units or 3.5 acre threshold has been met, may be required to pay off the associated Special Tax. Prior to final map approval, the developer shall submit an application to the City Manager for review and assignment of tax exempt status for Public Property, Property Owner Association Property, and Affordable Housing Property within the proposed development. Said application shall include the following information: 1. Acreage associated with public streets. 11. Acreage associated with Property Owner Association Property 1. private streets 2. parks 3. other common areas. III. Size of individual lots created by the subdivision map. IV. The square footage of homes or buildings to be constructed on lots. If the square footage is not known at the time of final map approval, then this information shall be submitted to the City Manager prior to issuance of building permits. V. The number of proposed affordable dwelling units and the acreage of the lots upon which said affordable dwellings units are constructed. SCA This approval maybe appealed to the City Council within 10 calendar days from the date of this approval in accordance with Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code. SCB This project shall be subject to all development limitations on the phased development of Encinitas Ranch set forth in the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan. At the time of project implementation, no building permits shall be issued for development which exceeds square footage, number of building units, traffic generation, or other applicable limitations set forth in the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan at that time. SCC Approval of this application shall be consistent with the terms, conditions, and time frames established pursuant to the Development Agreement approved by the City Council on September 28, 1994 as Ordinance No. 94 -19 and recorded by the San Diego County Recorders Office as Document No. 1994 - 0713677 on December 14, 1994. SCD Owner shall comply with requirements of the Encinitas Union School District as identified in Section 3.2.12(a) and Exhibit G of the Development Agreement SCF In the event the Community Development Director determines that substantial changes are proposed for the approved project, the changes shall be reviewed by the cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)17 Encinitas Ranch Planning Commission Subcommittee. At the request of the Community Development Director, the Subcommittee will review the proposed modifications relative to the findings for substantial conformance with a design review permit contained in Section 23.08.140 of the Municipal Code. Modifications beyond the scope described therein may require submittal and approval of an amendment of the design review permit by the Planning Commission. SCG The floor plan types (Plans 1 -5) shall be sited on the individual residential lots as depicted on the approved Design Review Permit Site Plan. Siting of the Plan types shall not be revised without the review and approval of the Encinitas Ranch Planning Commission Subcommittee. Changes to the architectural facade types for a particular floor plan type is permitted provided that the architectural facade design shall not be repeated within three (3) houses on either side of a home nor directly across the street. With regard to the Plan 4 and Plan 5, the same elevation designation shall not be repeated to either side nor directly across the street (i.e., a Plan 4A cannot be plotted next to a Plan 5A, nor directly across the street). As listed in the building plan/elevation matrix, individual color schemes have been selected for each home from the approved color boards (Schemes 1 -9) approved for the subject project. The scheme used for each home may be changed, however, no scheme shall be repeated on adjacent homes nor directly across the street. "Directly across the street ", for purposes herein, shall be defined so that in the event that the subject home's property lot lines, when extended across the street, encompass more than one lot, then the architectural facade and/or color limitations would apply to all lots so encompassed. The floor plan, elevation and color scheme type chosen to be utilized for each individual home shall be referenced on the respective home's building permit application. The floor plan, elevation, and color scheme type shall conform with the approved plan siting and/or criteria noted above. Any changes proposed to the floor plan, elevation, or color scheme type subsequent to building permit issuance shall also be reviewed and approved by the Encinitas Ranch Planning Commission Subcommittee and/or the Community Development Department as applicable. Approved changes shall be revised accordingly on the approved building permit plans. SCH The courtyard fence proposed on Lot 10 within the front yard setback shall be limited to four feet in height; any additional ornamentation or treatments above the four foot height shall conform with Section 30.16.01 OF. La. SCI The block type proposed for the theme wall, the view wall and all retaining walls shall be RCP Padre Brown. Additionally, the tubular steel fencing shall be painted Frazee /Alcazar Brown 8306N and the wood fence shall be painted Frazee /Jericho Brown 8305D to match the masonry block selected for the project. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (22/99 - Final)l8 SCJ The hardscape treatment proposed at the neighborhood entry shall utilize Omaha Tan (Davis Colors 1LB 5084) as the base color with additional colors applied on top. As requested by the Subcommittee and agreed to by the applicant, the rolled curb and gutter within the private road, the sidewalks and the driveways shall be colored Omaha Tan. SCK Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map, the Subdivider shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative map and the following improvementsto City Standards to the satisfactionof the City Engineer: Quail Garden Drive along the project frontage south to Leucadia Boulevard; and off -site sewer improvements extending north to the golf course. SCL Prior to final map and grading permit issuance, final landscape plans depicting City public road standards for sight distance along Quail Gardens Drive at the project entrance shall be submitted for review and approval by the Traffic Engineer. SCM Exterior wall surfacing materials shall be non - combustible materials. SCN Glazing materials shall be tempered glass or multi - layered glass panels. SCO Roof covering shall not be less than a Class "A" Roof Assembly. SCP Ventilation in exterior walls and attics shall meet Encinitas Fire Department requirements. SCQ Projections such as balconies, carports, decks, patio covers, etc., shall meet Encinitas Fire Department requirements. When such appendages and projections are attached to exterior fire resistive walls, they shall be constructed to maintain the fire resistive integrity of the walls. SCR Insulation which is paper faced shall be prohibited. SCS In conformance with Section 30.46.110 of the Municipal Code, the construction trailer shall be removed from the site prior to the final occupancy approval for the last residential unit within the project. SCT Prior to final map approval, final landscape plans and construction documents shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval. The landscaping in graded open space and other buffer areas (Lots 1 through 6, 17, and 19) shall include a mix of compatible fire resistant native and drought tolerant non - intrusive ornamental species developed in consultation with the Encinitas Fire Department and California Department of Fish and Game. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final) 19 This landscape pl< it mix shall include the same or similar native species known to the site and/or nearby similar plant communities as acceptable to the Encinitas Fire Department and available as seed or container stock. Graded banks as shown on the final map shall be staked in the field and grading activities prohibited outside the designated grading envelope. A certification of completion of the site grading delineation shall be submitted by the grading contractor or other responsible party prior to any clearing of vegetation or grading activity to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. SCU Upon completion of the installation of all project landscaping and irrigation systems, a final field observation shall be conducted and a certification of substantial completion shall be completed and signed by a state licensed landscape architect, landscape contractor or an irrigation designer who also holds a state license in the landscape field. SCV All future development on Lot 17 shall have gravity flow sewer unless otherwise waived by the City Engineer. SCW Unless waived by the Community Services Director, separate Public Improvement Plans including Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Community Services Department for review in Auto Cad format. Upon approval of the plans a copy of the approved plans shall be delivered to the Community Services Department on disk in Auto Cad format. Landscaping and irrigation within the public right -of -way shall be to City standards and to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director. SCX The subject project is obligated to provide one (1) affordable housing unit pursuant to the Encinitas Ranch Development Agreement and the Encinitas Ranch Affordable Housing Compliance Plan as adopted or amended. SCY Any accessory units proposed within the subdivision shall conform with Section 30.48.040V of the Municipal Code which includes the requirement to provide full kitchen facilities. SCZ For any accessory units proposed within the project for the purpose of meeting the affordable housing requirements, the developer shall execute and record a covenant satisfactory to the Community Development Director reserving the subject units as affordable housing units in accordance with the Encinitas Ranch Development Agreement and the Encinitas Ranch Affordable Housing Compliance Plan as adopted or amended. SCZI In conformance with Section 6.5.3C.3 of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan, all utility connections shall be designed to coordinate with the architectural elements of cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)20 the site so as not to be exposed except where necessary. Prior to building permit issuance, pad - mounted transformers and/or meter box luzations shall be included in the site plan with the appropriate screening treatment. Transformer, terminal boxes, meter cabinets, pedestals, ducts and other facilities may be placed above ground provided they are screened with landscaping or other appropriate screening devices. /S2 The following shall be noted on the final map: Every Lot and all other areas of the lower North Mesa subdivision known as TM lye( t/ 98 -171 (the "Subdivision ") shown on this plat are burdened with a perpetual, �l nonexclusive easement permitting golf balls to enter and land within the subdivision VI from the Encinitas Ranch Golf Course. Under no circumstances shall the owner or operator of the Encinitas Ranch Golf Course (including without limitation, the City of Encinitas, its officers, employees and agents, its successors and assigns, and any lessee thereof or any management company operating the facility) be held liable for any damage or injury resulting from golf balls on this easement, nor be enjoined from operating the Encinitas Ranch Golf Course or any hole or facility thereon, as a result of golf balls entering and landing on said Lots and other areas of the Subdivision. SCZ3 The subdivider shall include the following language to be made apart of every deed for each residential lot within the project subdivision: The property conveyed by this deed (the "Property") is subject to an easement permitting golf balls from the Encinitas Ranch Golf Course (the "Golf Course ") to enter and land on the Property. Under no circumstances shall the owner or operator of the Encinitas Ranch Golf Course, including but no limited to the City of Encinitas, its officers, agents and employees; lessees or contractors (including management companies), as well as their respective successors or assigns be held liable for any damages or injury resulting from nor be enjoined from operating the Golf Course, any hole or any facility thereon as a result of golf balls on this easement. The grantee relinquishes any right to enjoin the operations of the Golf Course, any hole and any facility thereon, or asserts claims against, and expressly agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, the City of Encinitas, its officers, employees, agents lessees, contractors (including management companies), as well as their respective successors and assigns, with respect to any and all claims, causes of action, losses, damages, costs and expenses (including without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees) of whatever nature, now existing or hereafter arising out of or related to any damage to property or the injury or death of any person that occurs as a result of golf balls traveling over or across, or landing on or near, any property or improvements within the lower North Mesa subdivision known as TM 98 -171, Map No. , including without limitation, the Property. The grantee hereby agrees that any and all requirements of the laws of the State of California required to be cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)21 satisfied in order for the provisions of this paragraph to constitute a restrictive covenant running with the land shall be deemed satisfied in full, and that any requirements of privity of estate are intended to be satisfied, or in the alternative, that an equitable servitude has been created to ensure that the restrictions contained in this paragraph run with the land conveyed by this deed. Every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter conveying the Property described in this deed, or any part of or interest in the Property, shall expressly provide that such conveyance is subject to the restrictions of the preceding paragraph - provided, however, that the preceding paragraph shall survive and be effective as to successors and/or assigns of all or any portion of or interest in the Property, regardless of whether the conveying contract, deed or other instrument provides that such conveyance is so subject. SCZ4 Prior to Final Map approval, the CC &R's for the subject project shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval. The following language shall be included in the CC &R's for the subject project: THE GOLF COURSE a. Golf Ball Easement - Every Lot and all other areas of the Subdivision are burdened with a perpetual, non - exclusive easement permitting golf balls to enter and land on subject Lot or portion of the Subdivision from the golf course adjacent to the Subdivision. Under no circumstances shall any of the following persons be held liable for any damage or injury resulting from nor be enjoined from operating the Golf Course as a result of golf balls on this easement the Declarant and its principals, successors or assigns; the Association and its members (in their capacity as such); and the City of Encinitas, its officers, employees, agents, lessees, contractors (including management companies) and their respective successors or assigns (collectively referred to herein as "City "). b. All Owners of Lots are advised that no representations or warranties have been made or are made by the Declarant, City, or any other Person with regard to the continuing existence, ownership or operation of the Encinitas Ranch Golf Course (the "Golf Course "). No purported representation or warranty in that regard, whether written or oral, shall be effective without an amendment to this Declaration executed or joined into by the Declarant and approved by City. C. Neither the Declarant, the Association nor City guarantees or represents that any view over or across the Golf Course from adjacent Lots will be preserved without impairment. City has no obligation to prune or thin trees or other landscaping on the Golf Course, and may at any time add trees and other landscaping to the Golf Course. City may also, at any time, in its sole discretion, change the location, configuration, size and elevation of the tees, cd/DL /RPC98171.907 (22/99 - Final)22 bunkers, fairways and greens of the Golf Course - regardless of whether such changes diminish or obstruct the view from any Lot. d. This Article may not be amended without the written approval of the Declarant and City. SCZ5 As contained in the December 10, 1998 Supplement to the Water Availability Letter, the following Olivenhain Municipal Water District conditions apply to the subject project,: a. Payment of all capacity fees, as appropriate, when due in accordane with District Ordinance 241, or successor Ordinance, not attached hereto, but included herein by reference. b. The developer shall provide all fee and easements as required for construction of on -site and off -site facilities as required by the District, in its sole discretion. C. Construction of all on -site and off -site facilities shall be completed as determined by the District, in its sole discretion. d. All costs of whatever sort or nature for the work performed or to be performed by the District staff, the District's consulting engineer, or the District's legal counsel as related to this project are at the sole cost of the developer. e. The developer shall be responsible for the annexation of 8 lots and additional acreage within the subject project from the San Dieguito Water District to the Olivenhain Municipal Water District. All annexation/detachmentfees of any sort or nature as required by the agencies involved and LAFCO are at the sole expense of the developer. f. Upon annexation to the Olivenhain Municipal Water District, additional assessment fees under District Assessment District 96 -01 shall be applicable and are separate and apart from the fees for annexation. G1 STANDARD CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): /�� �' G4 Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall cause a covenant regarding N OCie real property to be recorded. Said covenant shall set forth the terms and conditions cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)23 of this grant of approval and shall be of a form and content satisfactory to the Community Development Director. G5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Municipal Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived herein. G7 Prior to issuing a final inspection on framing, the applicant shall provide a survey from a licensed surveyor or a registered civil engineer verifying that the building height is in compliance with the approved plans for the two -story residences. G8 A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as set forth in the Environmental Initial Study prepared by Curtis Scott Engelhom and Associates herein referenced, shall be established and funded by the developer or property owner. The amount of funds necessary to implement the MMRP will be determined by the Community Development and Engineering Services Departments prior to issuance of any permits for the project. G12 Prior to any use of the project site pursuant to this permit, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed or secured to the satisfactionof the Community Development Department. G13 The applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, School Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Flood Control Mitigation Fees, Park Mitigation Fees, and Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees. Arrangements to pay these fees shall be made prior to Final Map approval to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Engineering Services Departments. The applicant is advised to contact the Community Development Department regarding Park Mitigation Fees, the Engineering Services Department regarding Flood Control and Traffic Fees, applicable School District(s) regarding School Fees, the Fire Department regarding Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees, and the applicable Utility Departments or Districts regarding Water and/or Sewer Fees. G14 A plan shall be submitted for approval by the Community Development Department, the Engineering Services Department, and the Fire Department regarding the security treatment of the site during the construction phase, the on- and off -site circulation and parking of construction workers' vehicles, and any heavy equipment needed for the construction of the project. G19 Garages enclosing required parking spaces shall be kept available and useable for the parking of owner /tenant vehicles at all times. L1 The project is subject to Chapter 23.26 of the Municipal Code (Water Efficient Landscape Program), which requires a landscape and irrigation plan to be prepared cd/DL /RPC98171.907 (212/99 - Final)24 by a State licensed landscape designer. The requirements for the plans are listed in Chapter 23.26. The landscape and irrigation plans must be submitted as part of the building permit application for the project. L2 All required plantings and automated irrigation systems shall be in place prior to use or occupancy of new buildings or structures. All required plantings and automated irrigation systems shall be maintained in good condition, and whenever necessary, shall be replaced with new materials to ensure continued compliance with applicable landscaping, buffering, and screening requirements. All landscaping and irrigation systems shall be maintained in a manner that will not depreciate adjacent property values and otherwise adversely affect adjacent properties. All irrigation lines shall be installed and maintained underground (except drip irrigation systems). L3 All parking areas and driveways shall conform with Chapter 30.54 of the Municipal Code and the City's Offstreet Parking and Design Manual incorporated by reference therein. L4(b) All landscaping, fences, walls, etc. on the site, in any adjoining public parkways (the area between the front property line and the street) shall be permanently maintained by the homeowners association. The maintenance program shall include normal care and irrigation of the landscaping; repair and replacement of plant materials and irrigation systems as necessary; and general cleanup of the landscaped and open areas, parking areas and walkways, walls, fences, etc. Failure to maintain landscaping and the site in general may result in the setting of a public hearing to revoke or modify the approval. This condition shall be recorded with the covenant required by this Resolution. S2 A comprehensive Sign Program for this development to include temporary subdivision advertising signs and any model home and information signing shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. S3 Signs are approved as submitted and as shown in the approved project plans. Any a teration/additionto the approved signs not exempted in Municipal Code Chapter 30.60 may require a permit amendment, and the applicant should contact the Community Development Department prior to undertaking any such modification. M2 All project grading shall conform with the approved Tentative Map. In cases where no grading is proposed at the time of the Tentative Map, or in cases where the grading plan later submitted is not consistent with the approved Tentative Map, the applicant shall be required to obtain a design review permit for grading prior to issuance of grading permits. M6 Street names shall be approved by the City prior to the recordation of the final map, cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)25 and street addresses shall be provided by the Community Development Department prior w the issuance of building permits. MT2 The developer shall improve the recreation trail system as specified on the Tentative Subdivision Map identified as approved by the Planning Commission on January 28, 1999, in accordance with the adopted standards that are in effect at the time of grading permit issuance and to the satisfaction of the Community Development, Community Services, and Engineering Services Departments. Said improvements shall include grading, soil compaction, drainage control, signage, access control, erosion control, etc., in conformance with the "Interim Recreation Trail Standards" adopted by the City June 13, 1990. MT3 An open space easement shall be granted to the City over, upon, across and under the area defined on the final maps as a recreational trail and no building, structures or other things shall be constructed, erected, placed or maintained on subject easements except for the construction and maintenance of said trail and structures appurtenant to the trail and as approved by the Community Development, Community Services, and Engineering Services Departments. MT5 When public or private recreational trails are required as a part of the subdivision, the developer shall display a map in the sales office of said subdivision indicating the trails. MH3 All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but shall not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, streets, and all other adjacent and all known future development. MI-14 The developer shall provide a noise display board in the sales office to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. The display shall include the site plan and applicable noise impact contours. B1 BuildineCondition(s): CONTACT THE ENCINITAS BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): B2 The applicant shall submit a complete set of construction plans to the Building Division for plancheck processing. The submittal shall include a Soils/Geotechnical Report, structural calculations, and State Energy compliance documentation (Title 24). Construction plans shall include a site plan, a foundation plan, floor and roof framing plans, a floor plan, section details, exterior elevations, and materials specifications. Submitted plans must show compliance with the latest adopted editions of the California Building Code (The Uniform Building Code with cd/DL/KPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)26 California Amendments, the California Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Codes). Commercial and Multi - residential construction must also contain details and notes to show compliance with State disabled accessibility mandates. These comments are preliminary only. A comprehensive plancheck will be completed prior to permit issuance and additional technical code requirements may be identified and changes to the originally submitted plans may be required. FI FIRE CONDITIONS: �la �' CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): F2 ACCESS ROADWAY DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roadways shall have an unobstructed paved width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. EXCEPTION: Access to one (1) single family residence shall not be less than 16 feet of paved width. F4 TURNAROUNDS: All dead -end fire access roadways in excess of 150 feet in length or serving four (4) or more dwelling units shall be provided with a cul -de- sac. The cul -de -sac radius for public streets shall comply with city road standards. Streets constructed to private road standards where a turnaround is required shall have a cul -de -sac with a paved radius of not less than 36 feet. Cul- de -sacs in commercial projects shall comply with City road standards. Alternate types of turnarounds may be considered by the Fire Chief as needed to accomplish the purpose of the Fire Code. F5 GRADE: The gradient for a fire apparatus roadway shall not exceed 20.0 %. Grades exceeding 15.0% (incline or decline) shall not be permitted without mitigation. Minimal mitigation shall be the installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems for structures accessed by such a roadway. F6 GATES: All automatic gates across fire access roadways shall be equipped with a Fire Department approved emergency key operated switch that will override all command functions and open the gate. Gates accessing four (4) or more residential lots shall also be equipped with emergency traffic control activating strobe sensor(s) which will activate and open the gate upon the approach of emergency apparatus. All automatic gates shall be tested by the Fire Department prior to their being left in the closed position. Plans for all gates shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. F7 RESPONSE MAPS: Any development that by virtue of new structures necessitates fire hydrants, roadways, or similar features, shall be required to provide a map in a format compatible with current Department mapping services, and shall be charged a reasonable fee for updating all Fire Department response maps. cd/DURPC98171.907 (212199 - Final)27 F8 COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS: Prior to the delivery of combustible materials on the project site, water and sewer systems shall satisfactorily pass all required tests and be connected to the public water and sewer systems. In addition, the first lift of asphalt paving shall be in place to provide a permanent all- weather surface for emergency vehicles. Said access shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. F10 OBSTRUCTIONS (ACCESS ROADWAYS): All traffic lanes shall be a minimum of 24 feet in width during construction and shall be maintained clear and free of obstructions during construction in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. F11 FIRE HYDRANTS & FIRE FLOWS: The applicant shall provide fire hydrants of a type, number, and location satisfactory to the Encinitas Fire Department. A letter from the water agency serving the area shall be provided that states the required fire flow is available. Fire hydrants shall be of a bronze type. A two - sided blue reflective road marker shall be installed on the road surface to indicate the location of the fire hydrant for approaching fire apparatus. F12 FUEL MODIFICATION ZONES: The applicant shall provide and maintain fire /fuel breaks to the satisfaction of the Encinitas Fire Department. F13 ADDRESS NUMBERS: Address numbers shall be placed in a location that will allow them to be clearly visible from the street fronting the structure. The height of the address numbers shall conform to Fire Department Standards. F14 ADDRESS NUMBERS FOR STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF ROADWAY: Where structures are located off a roadway on long driveways, a monument marker shall be placed at the entrance where the driveway intersects the main roadway. Permanent address numbers with height conforming to Fire Department standards shall be affixed to this marker. F15A AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM - SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES: Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. E1 ENGINEERING CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): cd/DUPPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)28 )i2 All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of building/grading permit issuance shall apply. EGl Grading Conditions EG2 No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In waiving this condition, the City Engineer shall consider the existing grading on the site under Grading Permit 4457G together with the need for erosion control and necessary improvements. The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. EG4 The grading for this project is defined in Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to the Engineering Services Director and verify compliance with Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. FG5 No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. E Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, all newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1. �►� F�r8 A soils /geological/hydraulicreport (as applicable) shall be prepared by a qualified 1400 p _� engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to perform such work: Such report shall be submitted and approved: Prior to final map approval. S � 6 �t� EGI O shall be issued for work occurring bet eenf October Municipal stof any year and April permit �j9aj of the following year, unless the plans for such work include details of protective 1, measures, including desilting basins or other temporary drainage or control measures, or both, as may be deemed necessary by the field inspector to protect the adjoining public and private property from damage by erosion, flooding, or the deposition of mud or debris which may originate from the site or result from such grading operations. ED1 Drainaee Conditions ED2 The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and shall construct temporary desiltationldetention basins of type, size cd/DL./RPC98171.907 (22/99 - Final)29 and location as approved by the Engineering Services Director. The basins and erosion control measures shall be shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or approved by the Engineering Services Director. The developer shall maintain the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a period of time satisfactory to the Engineering Services Director and shall guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the Engineering Services Director. ED3 A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water originating within the subdivision, and all surface waters that may flow onto the subdivision from adjacent lands, shall be required. Said drainage system shall include any easements and structures as required by the Engineering Services Director to properly handle the drainage. ED5 The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the final map for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan and City of Encinitas Standards as required by the Engineering Services Director. X37 Concentrated flows across driveways and/or sidewalks shall not be permitted. el ED8 The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from a 100 - 40 year frequency storm under developed conditions is equal to or less than the runoff from a storm of the same frequency and duration under existing conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results. ES1 Street Conditions ES3 The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the Tentative Map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the Final Map for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. �ieciprocal access and/or maintenance agreements shall be provided ensuring access pgM nLA. tto all parcels over private roads, drives or parking areas and maintenance thereof to F Q l' the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director. 15�/y0199 . cd/DL /RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)30 ES5 Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, a right -of -way construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Director and appropriate fees paid, in addition to any other permits required. AN4'ES6 In accordance with Chapter 23.36 of the Municipal Code, the developer shall 9 execute and record a covenant with the County Recorder agreeing not to oppose the V ��s co formation of an assessment district to fund the installation of right -of -way Vol improvements. Iq( � . ES8 The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the Engineering Services Director prior to approval of the Final Map for this project. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Encinitas Standards based on R -value tests. The standard improvement plan check deposit is required. ES9 Some improvements shown on the Tentative Map and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The subdivider shall conform to Municipal Code Section 24.16.070 regarding offsite improvements and acquisition of property interest. EU1 Utilities EU2 The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective utility agencies regarding services to the project. EU3 The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G. & E., Pacific Telephone, and other applicable authorities. EU4 All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including existing utilities unless exempt by the Municipal Code. EU5 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation and undergroundingof existing public utilities, as required. EU7 The design of the division of land shall provide each cable operator an opportunity to construct, install and maintain, on land identified on the map as dedicated to public utility use, any equipment necessary to extend cable television services to each residential parcel in the subdivision. This conditions shall not apply to the conversion of existing dwelling units to condominiums, community apartments, or stock cooperatives. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)31 EU8 Subject to all applicable Federal and State laws, statutes and regulations, in the event of multiple cable communication operators desiring to serve new residential developments in which the electric power and telephone utilities are underground, the following procedure shall apply with respect to access to and utilization of underground easements: (a) The developer shall be responsible for contacting and surveying all franchised cable operators to ascertain which operators desire to provide cable television service to the development. The developer may establish a reasonable deadline to receive responses from cable operators. The final tract map shall indicate the cable operator(s) that have agreed to serve the development. (b) If one or more cable operators wish to provide service, they shall be accommodated in the joint utilities trench on a nondiscriminatory shared basis. (c) The developer shall provide at least (10) working days notice of the date that the utility trenches will be open to the cable operators that have agreed to serve the development. (d) Sharing the joint utilities trench shall be subject to compliance with Public Utilities Commission and utility standards. If such compliance is not possible, or if three (3) or more operators desire to provide service to the development, the developer shall provide a separate trench for the cable television cables, with the entire cost shared among the participating cable operators. With the concurrence of the developer, the affected utilities and the cable television operators, alternative installation procedures, such as the use of deeper trenches, may be utilized, subject to the applicable law. (e) Any cable operator wishing to serve an area where the trenches have been closed shall be responsible for separate trenching and associated costs; provided that if the cable operator was not provided timely written notice of the availability of such trenches, the developer shall reimburse the operator for such costs. EMI ,;Mal) This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) phase. cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)32 CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Services Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, Ca. 92024 -3633 Phone (760) 633 -2770 Fax (760) 633 -2818 TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: First American Title Insurance Co. Date: 411 Ivy Street lob. No. San Diego, Ca. 92101 Ref No. Cathy Clark - Title Officer (619) 231 -4656 RE: Final Map for TM 98 -171 Enclosed: • Sheets 1-6 of City of Encinitas Tract No. TM 98 -171 • Tax Certificate September 29, 2000 TM 98 -171 1170880 -15 Please send the city a conforming copy of the recorded map. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2839. Thank you. From: Tamara O'Neal Assistant Civil Engineer cc: File FORM 1359 (4/75) CLTA SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE FORM NO. I SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE SUBDIVISION: CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98-171 ORDERNO.: 1170880 -15 r 0"- - 9 LOGO FEE: $100.00 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, 1911"i :7:�ulr4*1 THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND ANY CITY WITHIN WHICH SAID SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED IN A SUM NOT EXCEEDING $1,000.00. THAT, ACCORDING TO THOSE PUBLIC RECORDS WHICH, UNDER THE RECORDING LAWS, IMPART CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF MATTERS AFFECTING THE TITLE TO THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY SHOWN ON THE MAP OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED SUBDIVISION, THE ONLY PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN SAID LAND WHOSE SIGNATURES ARE NECESSARY, UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, ON THE CERTIFICATES CONSENTING TO THE RECORDATION OF SAID MAP AND OFFERING FOR DEDICATION ANY STREETS, ROADS, AVENUES AND OTHER EASEMENTS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION BY SAID MAP ARE: BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AS OWNER EQUITABLE DEED COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AS TRUSTEE UNDER SAID DEED OF TRUST RECORDED JUNE 2, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000- 0289950 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE SIGNATURE OF THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISION OF SECTION 66436, SUBSECTION (a) (3) (A) (i) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY: OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS RECORDED MARCH 3, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81-063248, MARCH 25, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81- 089130, AND JUNE l6, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000-0318553, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. CITY OF ENCINITAS, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 13356 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1996. LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 13356 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1996 AND DOCUMENT RECORDED JUNE 26, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000-0334336 AND JULY 11, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000-0363357, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 29, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0046663 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DANIELS CABLEVISION. HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 19, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0085612 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE MAP HEREINBEFORE REFERRED TO IS A SU13DMSION OF: LOT 75 OF CITY OF ENCR41TAS TRACT NO. 94-066 UNITS 4,5 AND 6, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 13356, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996. DATED: AUGUST 1, 2000 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 111E I Ng q �Vp� D1i19M4r 9, CATHY .ARK - TITLE OFFICER DIRECT IAL PHONE 231 -4656 c m FAX NO. 231 -4647 a SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage (ad the Company will not pay costs. attorneys fees or expenses) which arise by reason of 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any lacls, rights. interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, claims of easement or enumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines . shortage in area encroachments. or any other facts which a Coned survey would disclose. and which are not shown by public recortls. 5. Unpatenled mining claims. reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, water rights. claims or title to water. 6. Any lien or right to a lien, lot services, labor or material heretofore or newfler lumished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records 8. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY - 1992 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage. Cosa. attorneys fees or expenses which arise by reason of 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting regulating . prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, fill the character dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land) (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of Which Ire land IS or was a pan or tv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations except to the extent That a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy . but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior To Dale of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3 Defects, liens. encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters (a) created. suffered assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant. (b) not known to the Company not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but (mown to the insured claimant and not disclosed in willing to the Company by die insured claimant prior to the state the insured claimant became an insured under this policy. (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant. (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy. or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have bee sustained it the insured claimant had paid value lot me estate of interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arses out of the Irarsec6on vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy. by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy. state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that is based on P) the transaction creating the estate a interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer. or Iii) the transaction clearing the estate Of interest insured by this policy being defamed a preferential banister except where the preferential transfer results from the far ma (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer. or (b) of such recordalion to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien Creditor. 9. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY - 1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the Armenian Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 8 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of Pan One 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies Was or assessments on real property or by the public recortls. 2. Any facts, rights. interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements. claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies. conflicts In boundary lines. shortage in area encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public recortls. S. Unpalenled mining claims. reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof water rights, claims or [life to water. 6. Any lie, or right to a lien, for service labor of material theretofore or hereafter lumfshed. imposed by law and not shown by the public recortls. 10. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY - 1987 EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B. you are not insured against loss costs attorneys lees and expenses resulting from 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law of government regulation This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning. • antl use • land division •improvements on the land • environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in Ne public records al Policy Date This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered The Risks. 2. The right to take the land by Concerting it, unless. • a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the Policy Date • the akmg happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking. 3. Title Risks. • that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you • that are known to you but not to us, on the Policy Date - unless they appeared in the public records • mat result in no loss to you • that first affect your Iftle after the Policy Date - this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your title 5. lack of a right • to any and outside me area specifically o cubed and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A, or • in streets, alleys, or waterways In IOP lard This exclusion does not limit Ire access coverage in Coeired Title Risla. Form No. 1068 -1 (Rev. 10117/92) • Exhibit A to Preliminary Report ¢S T A M E R 1, C 9 �c 2 \\ ILI Preliminary Report First American Title Insurance Company EXHIBIT A LIST OF PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (By Policy Type) 1. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss Or damage land Ine Company will not pay costs, attomeys' lees or expenses) which arise by reason at 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taking authority that levies taxes or assessments an real properly or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in tares or assessments. or notice of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land Or which may be aSSerled by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims Ihereol, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines. shortage in area, encroachments, or any Other facts which a correct survey would disclose. and which are nor shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpalented mining claims, (b) reservations or exceptions In patents or in Acts authorizing The issuance thereof, (c) water rights, claims or title IO water, whether or not The maters excepted under (a). (b). or (c) are shown by the public records. EXCWSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following maters are expressly excluded from the coverage Of this pahcy and me Company will not pay loss or damage costs, attorneys lees or expenses which ause by reason of 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (Including but not limited to building and zoning laws ordinances, or regulations) restricting regulating. prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy use.. or enjoyment of the land. (ii) the eheracler, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land. (iii) a separation In ownership or a charge in the dimensions Of area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part, or (iv) environmental protection. a The effect of any violation of these lam . ordinances or governmental regulations. except to the extent that a notice of me enforcement thereof or a notice of a detect. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded a the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above except to the extent that a notice of The exercise thereat or a notice of a defect hen or encumbrance resulting tram a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded In the public records at Date of Policy 2 Rights of eminent Tomato unless notice at the exercise thereat has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred pnOr to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge 3 Defects . liens encumbrances. adverse claims, or other maters (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy, but created suffered assumed or agreed to by the Insured claimant, (b) not known to the Company. not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the Insured claimant and not disclosed In writing to The Company by The insurer claimant prior to the dale the insured claimant became an insured under this policy: (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant. (T) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy, or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained II the Insured claimanl had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unentorceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the Inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the Indebtedness, to comply with file applicable 'doing business' laws of the stale In which the land its situated 5. Invalidity or unenforcermility of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof . which arises out of the Transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth In lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out at the transaction vesting In the insured the estate or Interest Insured by their policy or the Transaction creating the interest of the insured lender. by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, slate insolvency or similar creditors rights laws. 2. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B - 1970 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prolublting IN occupancy, use or enjoymenl of the land. or regulating me diameter . dimensions or location of any Improvement now ar hereafter erected on the land. or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in tie dimensions of area of The land. or me effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears In the public records at Dale 01 Policy 3. Detects, liens encumbrances. adverse claims, or other matters (al createer . suffered assumed on agreed to by the Insured claimant lo) nal known to The Company and not shown by The public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or Interest Insured by this policy and not disclosed in wrong by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such Insured claimed became an insured hereunder, (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured claimant Id) attaching or created subsequent to Dale of Policy, or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value jar the estate or interest insured by This policy 3. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B - 1970 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When The American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy The exclusions set forth In paragraph 2 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in The policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the matters shown in parts one and two following Parr One 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing hens by the records of any lazing authority that levies faxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession Ihereol. 3. Easements, claims of easement a encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines shortage in area. encroachments. Or any other Idols which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Untalented mining claims. reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, water rights. claims Or title to water. 6 Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or male ral heretofore or hereafter furnished. imposed by law and not shown by the public records 11, it �ERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY*70 WITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1 Any law ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the lani or regulating the character, dimensions or localfon of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law ordinance or governmental regulation. 2 Rights of eminent Tomain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears In the public records at Dale of Policy 3 Detects, liens. encumbrances. adverse claims. or other matters (a) created. suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant, (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by his policy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by The insured claimant to The Company prior to the date such Insured claimant became an insured hereunder, (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant. (d) attaching OF created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or to The extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy) - 4 Unenforcrrabilily of the lien of the insured mongage because of failure or the insured at Dale of Policy or of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness to comply wife applicable 'doing business" laws of me state In which The land is situated. 5. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1970 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the Amer car Winn -:ie Associar on yeqoc,S 'o cy S sea as a Sturaa:r: va'age -c. cy ant ce: as err Lxtec , rage'Dtc, 'rte excis ors set fo'm ° paragraph bar are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear In the policy. SCHEDULE 0 This Policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of The maters shown in parts one and Two following Pan One I Taxes or assessments which are not shown as Trading liens by The records of any taring aulhonty That levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records 2 Any facts, rights interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3 Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by The public records 4 Discrepancies. conflicts in boundary lines shortage in area encroachments or any other lacts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5 impalement mining claims reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof water rights, claims m title to water 6 Any lien, or right to a lien, for services . labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1992 WITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The fallowing maters are expressly excluded from the caverage of This policy and the Company will nor pay loss of damage costs, attorneys lees or expenses which arise by reason of 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not hroad to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use. or enjoyment of the land. (sit the character, dimensions or location of any Improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, pill a separation in ownership or a change in The dimensions err area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part. or (iv) environmental protection or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to The extent that a notice of The enforcement thereof or a notice 01 a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting Iran a violation or alleged violation affecting the and has Dean recorded in The public records at Dale of Policy . Ili) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above. except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice al a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded In the public records at Dale of Poliay. 2 Rights of eminent domain unless noted of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date at Policy but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Dale of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge 3. Detects, liens encumbrances, adverse claims a other maters (a) created, suffered. assumed or agreed to by the insured claimi . of not known to the Company not recorded in the public records at Dale at Policy but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed In writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy. of mulling in no loss or damage to the insured claimant. to) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the Traenr trial this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services labor or malenal or the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at date of policy). or et resulting in joss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for lee insured mortgage. 4. Unenlorceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure at the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure or any subsequent owner of the mdebledne5s. to comply with applicable 'doing business' laws of the state in which the land is situated 5 Invalidity or unenfomeability of the lien or The insured mortgage, or claim thereof. which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending jaw. 6 Any statutory ben for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, Tabor or malertals over the lien of the insured mortgage) ansing from an improvement or work related to the land which is contacted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or In pan by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy me insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the Transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy. stale insolvency or similar creditors rights laws. that Is based on pl the transaction creating The interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent Transfer. or (it) the subordination of the interest at the insured mortgagee as a result of the applicator, of the doctrine of equitable subordination. or (iis) the transaction dreading the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential Transfer results from the failure (a) to timely record The instrument of trdnSll or (b) of such recmdabon to impan notice !e a purchaser for value or a judgment or ten creditor 7. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and rot as an Extended Coverage Po¢y the exclusions set form in paragraph 6 above are used and The lollowing exceptions to coverage appear in the policy o ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 'r FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 411 IVY STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 P.O. BOX 808, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92112 (619) 238 -1776 AUGUST 7, 2000 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES 10179 HUENNEKENS ST., #200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 FA01QII[a)aik" yd03:11a8 is) .7c7:�7 YOUR REF. NORTH MESA OUR ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 AUG 9 20C'J IN RESPONSE TO THE HEREIN REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, THIS COMPANY HEREBY REPORTS THAT IT IS PREPARED TO ISSUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, A POLICY OR POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE DESCRIBING THE LAND AND THE ESTATE OR INTEREST THEREIN HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, INSURING AGAINST LOSS WHICH MAY BE SUSTAINED BY REASON OF ANY DEFECT, LIEN OR ENCUMBRANCE NOT SHOWN OR REFERRED TO AS AN EXCEPTION HEREIN OR NOT EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORMS. THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FROM THE COVERAGE OF SAID POLICY OR POLICIES ARE SET FORTH HEREIN. COPIES OF THE POLICY FORMS SHOULD BE READ. THEY ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS REPORT. PLEASE READ THE EXCEPTIONS SHOWN OR REFERRED TO BELOW AND THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS REPORT CAREFULLY. THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS ARE MEANT TO PROVIDE YOU WITH NOTICE OF MATTERS WHICH ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY AND SHOULD BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THIS PRELIMINARY REPORT IS NOT A WRITTEN REPRESENTATION AS TO THE CONDITION OF TITLE AND MAY NOT LIST ALL LIENS, DEFECTS, AND ENCUMBRANCES AFFECTING TITLE TO THE LAND. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. DATED AS OF AUGUST 1, 2000 AT 7:30 A.M. CATHY rY.ARK - TITLE OFFICER :)IRECT151AL PHONE 231 -4656 FAX NO. 231 -4647 PAGE ORDER NO. 1170880-15 xc THE FORM OF POLICY TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REPORT IS: SUBDIVISION MAP GUARANTEE TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: FEE THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2000 -2001, A LIEN, NOT YET PAYABLE. 2. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTES OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES: THE REQUIREMENT THAT THIS COMPANY BE FURNISHED WITH ALL SUPPLEMENTAL TAX BILLS, IF ANY, FROM THE OWNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEFORE CLOSE OF ESCROW. 3. AGREEMENTS REGARDING A LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT ALL DATED JANUARY 6, 1969, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN PAUL ECKE AND MAGDALENA ECKE, HUSBAND AND WIFE AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RECORDED JANUARY 16, 1969 AS FILE NOS. 9496, 9497 AND 9498, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1971 AS FILE NO. 37597 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE v d ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 A SECOND AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT RECORDED APRIL 20, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83- 127425 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A NOTICE OF NON - RENEWAL AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE: 1, CONTRACT NOS: 4444 0500 -A, 4445 -0500 -A AND 4446- 0500 -A, RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1991 AS FILE NO. 91- 0685465 AND RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1992 AS FILE NOS. 1992- 0832703, 1992- 0832704 AND 1992 - 0832705, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. NOTICE OF NON - RENEWAL ECKE AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE NO. 1 CONTRACT NO. 67 -3 DOCUMENT NO. 4444-0500 -A WAS RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1992 AS FILE NO. 1992 -0689595 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A CERTIFICATE OF TENTATIVE PARTIAL CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965, CONTRACT NOS. 4444-0500 -A, 4445 - 0500-A AND 4446- 0500 -A, RECORDED AUGUST 22, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0368222 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 4446- 0500-A, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0418984 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 4444 0500 -A, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0418985 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A THIRD AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 4445 -0500 -A, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0418986 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A CERTIFICATE OF FINAL PARTIAL CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965, WHICH WAS RECORDED OCTOBER 12, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0462745 AND CORRECTED OCTOBER 13, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0465149, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A CERTIFICATE OF TENTATIVE PARTIAL CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965, RECORDED MARCH 27, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996- 0150812 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 4. AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE OR PIPELINES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, TOGETHER WITH SUCH FDCTURES AND APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS, EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC CORPORATION RECORDED MARCH 3, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81- 063248 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN LOT 75 AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 13356. PAGE ..t A M F. ft 4 i ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE OR PIPELINES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, TOGETHER WITH SUCH FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS, EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, RECORDED MARCH 25, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81- 089130 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF LOT 75 AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 6. DEED RESTRICTION DATED OCTOBER 26, 1988 EXECUTED BY PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PAUL JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, PAUL ECKE III, PAUL ECKE SR., TRUSTEE OF THE PAUL ECKE SR. TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1983 AND THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SUBJECTED TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1989 AS FILE NO. 89- 082586 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 7. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 94-3 OF THE SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994 - 0488541 AND NOVEMBER 16, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0521630 BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 94-3 OF THE SAN DIEGUTTO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996 - 0482284 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 8. A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1994, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; PAUL ECKE, JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983; NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; R.E.L.S, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; CHARLES S. CARTER AND RUTH DRAPER CARTER, BOTH AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER THE DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2,1982; RAYMOND A. WHTTWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID N. WHTTWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; CRAIG P. WHTTWER, AN INDIVIDUAL AND GENEEN L. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL. RECORDED: DECEMBER 14, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994- 0713677 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE i I ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. AN ASSIGNMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FROM CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUSTEE, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUST DID 8/7/97, LIZBETH A. ECKE, TRUSTEE OF THE LIZBETH A. ECKE TRUST DATED MARCH 31, 1994 AND NORTH MESA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO ENCINITAS RANCH LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED MARCH 2, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0109370 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN AGREEMENT FOR ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND FOR PROVISION OF SEWER SERVICE THERETO, DATED APRIL 24, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, A COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; PAUL ECKE, JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983; NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; CHARLES S. CARTER AND RUTH DRAPER CARTER, AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2,1982; RAYMOND A. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID N. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; CRAIG P. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND GENEEN L. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL. RECORDED: MAY 30, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0225327 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 10. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -39 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS ENCINITAS RANCH ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WAS RECORDED JUNE 16, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0254447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 11. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE ENCINITAS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 ( ENCINITAS RANCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 14, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0299308 AND AUGUST 25, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0377363, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE .� A M E R/ ORDER NO. 1170880-15 A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 ( ENCINITAS RANCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), WAS RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 -0377298 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN WHICH RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0489781 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SAID PURCHASE AGREEMENT IS SUBORDINATE TO THE DEEDS OF TRUST RECORDED DECEMBER 8, 1995 AS FILE NO. NOS. 1995-0559947,1995-0559948 AND 1995- 0559949 ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BY THE TERMS OF A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RECORDED JUNE 12, 1997 AS FILE NO. 1997 - 0275373 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 12. AN UNRECORDED ALLOCATION AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 22, 1994, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS DISCLOSED BY MEMORANDUM. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PAUL ECKE, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, ELISABETH K. ECKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMMD LIABILITY COMPANY, CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RAYMOND A. WHITWER, GENEEN L. WHITWER, DAVID N. WHITWER, CRAIG P. WHMVER, CHARLES S. CARTER, CO- TRUSTEE UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982, RUTH DRAPER CARTER, CO- TRUSTEE UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982 AND ENCINITAS TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. RECORDED: DECEMBER 11, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0561223 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 13. AN AGREEMENT TO IMPROVE DEVELOPMENT - WATER FACILITIES AGREEMENT NO. A -0024, DATED JULY 17, 1996, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. RECORDED: JULY 18, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996 - 0361000 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 1 ORDER NO. 1170880-15 14. AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO. 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. AFFECTS: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 75 LYING WITHIN QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. 15. AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES AND /OR MAINS, MANHOLES, SEWER LATERAL PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. AFFECTS: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 75, LYING WITHIN QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. 16. AN EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO. 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 17. AN EASEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 18. AN AGREEMENT REGARDING AGREEMENT TO IMPROVE SUBDIVISION SEWERS, DATED DECEMBER 14, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY. RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996- 0456801 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 19. AN EASEMENT FOR EITHER OR BOTH POLE LINES, UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 29, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0046663 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN THAT PORTION OF LOT 75 SHOWN AND DELINEATED AS "EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES GRANTED AND ACCEPTED HEREON" (QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AND LEUCADIA BOULEVARD) ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 20. A CABLE TELEVISION CONSTRUCTION WIRING AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 9, 1997, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: DANIELS CABLEVISION, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CARLSBAD RANCH COMPANY, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CHRISTOPHER C. PAGE 7 rS LL= ORDER NO. 117088045 CALKINS AND DIANE M. CALKINS; PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUSTEE, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUST DATED AUGUST 7,1997; LIZBETH A. ECKE, TRUSTEE OF THE LIZBETH A. ECKE TRUST DATED MARCH 31,1994; P.E. III PROPERTIES, LLC., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND NORTH MESA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. RECORDED: FEBRUARY 19, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998- 0085612 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE ROUTE OR LOCATION OF SAID EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM THE RECORD. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A ASSUMPTION AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1998, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: DANIELS CABLEVISION, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND ENCINITAS RANCH LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. RECORDED: APRIL 17, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0216615 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 21. AN AGREEMENT REGARDING CREATING CABLE ACCESS EASEMENT, DATED APRIL 19, 1999, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: BARRATT AMERICAN, INC. AND COXCOM, INC., DBA COX COMMUNICATIONS OF SAN DIEGO, INC. RECORDED: JULY 16, 1999 AS FILE NO. 1999 - 0495473 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 22. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, BUT DELETING ANY COVENANT, CONDITION OR RESTRICTION INDICATING A PREFERENCE, LIMITATION OR DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN TO THE EXTENT SUCH COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS VIOLATE 42 USC 3604(C), IN AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 AS FILE NO. 1999 - 0616746 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SAID INSTRUMENT PROVIDES THAT A VIOLATION THEREOF SHALL NEITHER DEFEAT NOR RENDER INVALID THE LIEN OF ANY MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST MADE FOR VALUE. 23. A OF COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: TENATATIVE MAP, DESIGN REVIEW AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN RECORDED FEBRUARY 1, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000 - 0051937 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 8 f A 11 k g 0� , x �L� ORDER NO. 1170880-15 24. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL SUM OF $50,000,000.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS OR OBLIGATIONS SECURED THEREBY, RECORDED NNE 2, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000 - 0289950 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: MAY 26, 2000 TRUSTOR: BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED TRUSTEE: EQUITABLE DEED COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AFFECTS THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED WITH OTHER PROPERTY. 25. AN EASEMENT FOR A PIPELINE OR PIPELINES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, TOGETHER WITH ANY OTHER FACILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC AGENCY, RECORDED JUNE 16, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000-0318553 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 26. AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINE(S) AND /OR MAINS, MANHOLES, SEWER LATERAL PIPELINES. AND ALL STRUCTURES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, RECORDED JUNE 26, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000-0334336 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE ROUTE OF SAID EASEMENT IS SET OUT IN SAID DOCUMENT AND AFFECTS A PORTION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 11, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000- 0363357 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT "THIS DOCUMENT BEING RECORDED TO CORRECT DOCUMENT NO. 2000- 0334336 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, RECORDED JUNE 26, 2000. PAGE i 1999 -2000 TAX INFORMATION: ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 CODE AREA: 19122 PARCEL NO.: 254 - 611 -07 -00 1 ST INSTALLMENT: $1,257.88 PAID 2ND INSTALLMENT: $1,257.88 PAID LAND VALUE: $118,937.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $ -0- EXEMPT: $ -0- CODE AREA: PARCEL NO.: 1 ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPT: 19410 254- 611 -09 -00 $1,139.59 PAID $1,139.59 PAID $199,390.00 $ -0- $ -0- CODE AREA: 19410 PARCEL NO.: 254 - 611 -10 -00 1 ST INSTALLMENT: $1,148.76 PAID 2ND INSTALLMENT: $1,148.76 PAID LAND VALUE: $199,390.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $ -0- EXEMPT: $-o- PAGE 10 y.� A M E . LEGAL DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. 1170880-15 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 75 OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 94-066 UNITS 4, 5 AND 6, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 13356, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996. OCTOBER 25, 1999 1:42 PM LB PAGE 11 SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage land @e Company will not pay costs, attorneys lees or expenses) which arise by reason of I. Taxes or assessments which are not stows as existing liens by the records of any taxing authonly that levies tyres or assessments on real properly or by the public records 2. Any facts rights. interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easement. claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by 0e public records. Discrepancies, conflets in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachment or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are nor shown by public records. Unparenled mining claims. reservations or exceptions in parents or in Act authorizing the issuance thereof. water rights. clamps or title to water Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished . imposed by law and not shown by the public records S. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY - 1992 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded tem the coverage of this policy and me Company will not pay loss or damage costs. attorneys lees or expenses which arise by reason or 1 (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation Including but not limited to budding and zoning Laws ormmnees, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to p) the occupancy use or enjoyment of the land. (II) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement new or hereafter erected on the land. III) a separation in owmership or a change in the dimensions or areal of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part. or Iv) environmental projection or the effect of any violation of these laws ordinances or governmental regulations except to The expert that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above. except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Dale at Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding an the right of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects liens, encumbrances, aMerse claims or other matters. (a) created. suffered. assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant, (b) not known to the Company, non recorded in the public records al Dale of Policy, but (mown to the insured claimant and nor disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimanl prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy. (c) resulting in no loss or damage to Ne insured claimant. (d) attaching or created subsequent to Dae of Policy, or le) resulting in loss or damage which would nor have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the Iransaclion vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency. or similar credilors rights laws, that is based on (i) the transaction creating the ware or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer. or (if) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer result from the faiium (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer, or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or hen creditor 9. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY - 1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Wtl Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 8 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear, in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does nor insure against loss or damage land the Company will not pay costs, attorneys fees or expenses) which arise by reason of Part One Taxes or assessment which are not shown as existing Inert by the records of any taxing authority thaw levies taxes or assessment on real property or by the public records. Any lads, rights, interests, or claims which are pol shown by the public records but which [Auld be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. Easement, claims of easement or encumbrances which are nor shown by the public records. Discrepancies, conflict in boundary lines, shortage in area encroachments or any other lacls which a correct survey would disclose. and which are nor shown by public records. Undeterred mining claims. reservations or exceptions in parents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereol. water rights, claims or title to water. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or oeteafter fumished, imposed by law and nor shown by the public records. 10. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY - 1957 EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B. you are not insured against loss, costs, atoneys' tees and expenses reselling horn t Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or govemmenl regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning • WM use • land division • improvements on Ile land • errvironmenlal protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 2. The right to lake the land by condemning it. unless • a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the Policy Dale • the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking. 3. Title Risks: that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you that are known to you, out not to us. on the Policy Dale - unless they appeared in Ina public records Nat result in no loss to you that first affect your title after the Policy Dale - Nis does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. failure to pay value for your tine 5. tack of a right . • to any land outside the area speciienly described and reported to in them 3 of Schedule A. or • In sheets, alleys. or waterways trial touch your This exclusion does not limit the access coverage inln 5 of Title Risks. w Form No. 1068 -1 (Rev. 10117192) Exhibit A to Preliminary Report 0 • . s • a QSX AMEBIC Preliminary Report First American Title Insurance Company EXHIBIT A LIST OF PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (By Policy Type) 1. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 SCHEDULE B LKIPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does bill insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys fees or expenses) which arise by reason of 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by me records of any taxing authority that levies axes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in tares or assessments. or notice of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but watch could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereol. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in ar encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatenled mining claims, (b) reservaliens en exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, of water rights, claims or tille to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b). OF (c) are shown by the public records. EXCWSIONS FRUM COVERAGE The following matte¢ are expressly excluded from Ire coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage costs anomeys' lees or expenses which arse by reason of I . (at Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning taws, ordinances, Or regulations) reshmlrng, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy. use or enjoyment at the land. Iii) the character, dimensions or location of any imDmiremere now or harm ¢acted on the land. (iii) a separetion in ownership a a change In the dimensions a area of the lad or any parcel of which Me two is or was a part or Qv) anironmemal protection or the ewl of any violation of these laws ordinances or governmental regulations. except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereat or a notice of a detect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded In the public records at Date of Policy of Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above except to the extent that a police of me exercise thereof or a notice of a defect lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy, but not excluding hom coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge 3. Defects. liens, encumbrances. adverse claims or other mafters. (a) wnether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, bud created suffered assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant, (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. but known 10 the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the inured claimant prior to the dale the inured claimant became an inured under this policy , (c) resulting in no loss OF damage to the insured claimant. (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy. or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained it the insured claimant had paid vaWe Ior the inured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by thus policy . 4. Unemorceabihry of the lien of the inured mortgage because of the inability or failure of Me inured at Dale of Policy . or The inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable 'doing business- laws of the state in which the land is situated 5. Invalidity or unentorceabdity of the lien of Ire inured mortgage. or claim thereat which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit prolechon or both in lending law 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by then policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender by reason of the operation al federal banluuplcy. stale insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. 2. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B - 1970 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE Any law, ordinance or governmental regulalion (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances( restricting or regulating or prMibding the occupancy. use or enjoyment al the land, or regulating the character . dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected an the land, or Drohmlli0g a separalion in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions 01 area at me land. or the effect of any violation of any such In ordinance or governmental regulation Rights of aminenl domain or governmental rights of police Power unless notice of the exa late of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Pohcy Defects. liens . encumbrances adverse claim. or other matters (a) created sumered, assumed a agreed to by the inured claimant. to) not known to the Company and not shown by the public retards but known to the insured claimant either at Dale of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an esue or imereu inured by this policy and not disclosed in wiling by the insured :laimare to the Company prior to the date such Inured claimant became an insured hereunder, (c) resulting in no loss or damage to he insured claimant. (0) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy. or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained it the insured clamant had paid value 101 too estate or Inlemsl insured by this policy. 3. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B - 1970 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American land The Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 2 above are used and the following excepppns to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE S This policy does nil inure against loss or damage by reason of the matters shown In parts one and Iwo following Pan One I. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by % records 01 any taking authority that levies later or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts. rights, interests, or claims which are nor shown by the public recortls but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry at persons in bonession thereol. 3. Easemems, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records 4 Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines shortage in all encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. and which are not shown by public records. 5. Untalented mining claims, reservations or exceptions in spends or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereol will rights. claims or litre to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for servil labor or material heretofore a hereafter furnished imposed by law and not shown by the public records. • . a. is *4. A AN LAND TITLE ASSOCATION Lu71N POLICY - 19� ITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE Any law. ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning Ordinances) restricting or regulating or prompting IN occupancy use or enjoymenl Of the land, or regulating the character. dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land OF prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land. or me effect at any violation of any such In ordinance or governmental regulation Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the execise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other Framers (a) created suffered, assumed or agreed to by The insured claimant. (o) not (mown to the Company and nor shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy of acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed m writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the dale such insured claimant became an insured hereunder (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant, (d) attaching or creates subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or marenal or to the expert insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction of completed at Date of Policy). Unenforceabdiry of the lien of the insured mortgage because of failure of tte insured at Date of Policy or of any Subsequent owner of the indebledrit to comply With applicable 'doing business" laws of the state in which Me two Is situated. 5. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1970 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title AssDClat10n Lenders Policy Is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in pa rgaph 4 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE 0 This policy does rrol inure against loss or damage by reason at the matters shown in parts one and we allowing Part One 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any lazing authority that levies axes an assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts. rights, interests, or claims which are nor shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons In possession thereol. 1 Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records 4. Discrepancies. contlicts in boundary lines, shortage in area. encroachments. or any other facts which a corned survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public recortls. 5. Unpalemed mining claims reservations or exceptions in parents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof , water rights. claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right he a lien, for services, labor or maehal theretofore or hereafter furnished. imposed by law and not shown by me public records 6. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1992 WITH A.L,T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters am expressly excluded from the Luerage of his ace the Company win nut Vasa loss Ux ur,,4e costs. attorneys fees or expenses which arise by reason of I (a) Any law. Ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning lam . ordinances . or regulations) restricting, regulating. prohibiting or relating to (1) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (it) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on me land, (III) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or and parcel of which the land is or was a part or (n) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws. ordinances or governmental regulations. except to the extent that a notice of me enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting Ise land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) soon. except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereol or a notice of a defect lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation of alleged vmlation affecting the land has been recorded In the public records at Date of Policy 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. but not excluding from coverage any taking which has Occurred prior 10 Date of Pohcy which Would be binding on the rights of a purcnaser for value without knowledge 3 Defects, liens. encumbrances adverse claims or other matters (a) created. suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant. (b) not Known to the Company, WI recorded In the public records at Dare of Policy, but kfgwn to the Insured claimant and nol disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimed prior to [he date the Insured claimant became an insured under this policyy. (c) resulting in an loss or damage to the insured claimant (d) attaching or created subsequent In Date of Policy (except to the extent Ina[ this policy Insures the Priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, taper or material or the extend insurance is afforded herein as to assessments lot street improvements under construction or completed at dale of policy)'. or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained it the insured claurral had paid value for the insured mortgage 4. Unenlorcea0ilidy at the lien of re insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the inured at Dale of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable "doing business" laws of the sate in which the land is situated. 5. Invelitlity or unentorceabifity of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereol which arises out of the Iransaction evidenced by the inured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit projection or truth in lending In 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien Ior services, labor or materials aver the lien of the insured mortgage) arising Iron an Improvement or work related to the two which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Dale of Policy and is viol financed in whole or in earl by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the Insured mortgage which at Date it Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7 Any claim, which arises out of the transaction ca ing the mteresl of the mongagee Insured by this policy by reason of the operation of ledeal bankruptcy, state insolvency, a similar creditors' rights laws that is Dane on (if the transaction cradling the Interest at the insured mortgagee Deng deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer. or (IT the subQdirahan of the interest it the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of die doctrine 01 equitable subordination. of (iii) the transaction creating IN intoned of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where The preferential transfer results from the talure (a) to limilly record me Instrument of banter, of (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor 7. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy me exclusions set form in paragraph 6 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. P A MF. Q, � ' ORDER NO. 1170880.15 r FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 411 IVY STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 r� P.O. BOX 808, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92112 (619) 238 -1776 MARCH 21. 2000 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES 10179 HUENNEKENS ST., #200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 YOUR REF. NORTH MESA OUR ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 IN RESPONSE TO THE HEREIN REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, THIS COMPANY HEREBY REPORTS THAT IT IS PREPARED TO ISSUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, A POLICY OR POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE DESCRIBING THE LAND AND THE ESTATE OR INTEREST THEREIN HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, INSURING AGAINST LOSS WHICH MAY BE SUSTAINED BY REASON OF ANY DEFECT, LIEN OR ENCUMBRANCE NOT SHOWN OR REFERRED TO AS AN EXCEPTION HEREIN OR NOT EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORMS. THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FROM THE COVERAGE OF SAID POLICY OR POLICIES ARE SET FORTH HEREIN. COPIES OF THE POLICY FORMS SHOULD BE READ. THEY ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS REPORT. PLEASE READ THE EXCEPTIONS SHOWN OR REFERRED TO BELOW AND THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS REPORT CAREFULLY. THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS ARE MEANT TO PROVIDE YOU WITH NOTICE OF MATTERS WHICH ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY AND SHOULD BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THIS PRELIMINARY REPORT IS NOT A WRITTEN REPRESENTATION AS TO THE CONDITION OF TITLE AND MAY NOT LIST ALL LIENS, DEFECTS, AND ENCUMBRANCES AFFECTING TITLE TO THE LAND. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. DATED AS OF MARCH 15, 2000 AT 7:30 A.M. GREG SIP TOL - TITLE OFFICER DIRECT DIAL PHO 231 -4656 FAX NO. 231 -4647 PAGI`. I �.k AMEp, P i� ��7 X11 LAY x ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 THE FORM OF POLICY TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REPORT IS: SUBDIVISION MAP GUARANTEE TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: FEE THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2000 -2001, A LIEN, NOT YET PAYABLE. 2. SECOND INSTALLMENT, GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999 -2000, A LIEN NOT YET DELINQUENT. 3. A BOND ISSUED UNDER THE 1915 ACT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF OLIVENHAIN WATER STORAGE PROJECT, ASSESSMENT NO. 0000, DISTRICT 96-1, WHICH IS CURRENTLY OR WILL BE COLLECTED ON THE TAX ROLL. IF PAY -OFF IS REQUIRED, THERE WILL BE ADDED FEES, INTEREST AND A PRE -PAY AMOUNT. A DATE OF PAY -OFF WILL HAVE TO BE PROVIDED BY YOU; AS INTEREST IS COMPOUNDED DAILY. PLEASE ALLOW 15 WORKING DAYS, AS A REPORT WELL HAVE TO BE ORDERED FROM AGENCY CONCERNED. 4. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTES OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. PAGE }� AM F. ff f C` P .f i pa1- x SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES: ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 THE REQUIREMENT THAT THIS COMPANY BE FURNISHED WITH ALL SUPPLEMENTAL TAX BILLS, IF ANY, FROM THE OWNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEFORE CLOSE OF ESCROW. 5. AGREEMENTS REGARDING A LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT ALL DATED JANUARY 6, 1969, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN PAUL ECKE AND MAGDALENA ECKE, HUSBAND AND WIFE AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RECORDED JANUARY 16, 1969 AS FILE NOS. 9496, 9497 AND 9498, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1971 AS FILE NO. 37597 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A SECOND AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT RECORDED APRIL 20, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83-127425 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A NOTICE OF NON - RENEWAL AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE: 1, CONTRACT NOS: 4444 0500 -A, 4445 -0500 -A AND 4446-0500 -A, RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1991 AS FILE NO. 91- 0685465 AND RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1992 AS FILE NOS. 1992- 0832703, 1992 - 0832704 AND 1992 - 0832705, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. NOTICE OF NON - RENEWAL ECKE AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE NO. I CONTRACT NO. 67 -3 DOCUMENT NO. 4444- 0500 -A WAS RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1992 AS FILE NO. 1992 -0689595 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A CERTIFICATE OF TENTATIVE PARTIAL CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965, CONTRACT NOS. 44440500 -A, 4445 - 0500-A AND 4446 0500 -A, RECORDED AUGUST 22, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0368222 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 4446- 0500-A, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0418984 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 4444 0500 -A, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0418985 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A THIRD AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 4445 -0500 -A, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0418986 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE Akl F. f,I r ORDER NO. 1170880-15 A CERTIFICATE OF FINAL PARTIAL CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965, WHICH WAS RECORDED OCTOBER 12, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0462745 AND CORRECTED OCTOBER 13, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0465149, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A CERTIFICATE OF TENTATIVE PARTIAL CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965, RECORDED MARCH 27, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996-0150812 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 6. AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE OR PIPELINES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, TOGETHER WITH SUCH FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS, EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN,/FAVOR OF OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC CORPORATION RECORDED MARCH 3, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81- 063248 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN LOT 75 AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 13356. 7. AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE OR PIPELINES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, TOGETHER WITH SUCH FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS, EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOA/OF OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, RECORDED MARCH 25, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81- 089130 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF LOT 75 AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 8. DEED RESTRICTION DATED OCTOBER 26, 1988 EXECUTED BY PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PAUL JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, PAUL ECKE III, PAUL ECKE SR., TRUSTEE OF THE PAUL ECKE SR. TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1983 AND THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SUBJECTED TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1989 AS FILE NO. 89- 082586 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 9. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 94 -3 OF THE SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994 - 0488541 AND NOVEMBER 16, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0521630 BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 943 OF THE SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996- 0482284 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE AM1I F.(!I! I ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 `�W;7 10. A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1994, UPON THE TERMS, 11 COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; PAUL ECKE, JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983; NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; R.E.L.S., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; CHARLES S. CARTER AND RUTH DRAPER CARTER, BOTH AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER THE DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2,1982; RAYMOND A. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID N. WHTTWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; CRAIG P. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL AND GENEEN L. WHTTWER, AN INDIVIDUAL. RECORDED: DECEMBER 14, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994- 0713677 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. AN ASSIGNMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FROM CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUSTEE, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUST DID 817/97, LIZBETH A. ECKE, TRUSTEE OF THE LIZBETH A. ECKE TRUST DATED MARCH 31, 1994 AND NORTH MESA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO ENCINITAS RANCH LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED MARCH 2, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0109370 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN AGREEMENT FOR ANNEXATION OF WATER DISTRICT AND FOR PROVISION APRIL 24, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COV THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: PAGE 5 PROPERTY TO THE LEUCADIA COUNTY OF SEWER SERVICE THERETO, DATED ENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, A COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; PAUL ECKE, JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983; NORTH MESA LLC, A PS p 4 1 7;W7 ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; CHARLES S. CARTER AND RUTH DRAPER CARTER, AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED NNE 2,1982; RAYMOND A. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID N. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; CRAIG P. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND GENEEN L. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL. RECORDED: MAY 30,1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0225327 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -39 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS ENCINITAS RANCH ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WAS RECORDED NNE 16, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0254447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 13. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE ENCINITAS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 ( ENCINITAS RANCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 14, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0299308 AND AUGUST 25, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0377363, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 ( ENCINITAS RANCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), WAS RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0377298 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN WHICH RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995-0489781 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SAID PURCHASE AGREEMENT IS SUBORDINATE TO THE DEEDS OF TRUST RECORDED DECEMBER 8, 1995 AS FILE NO. NOS. 1995-0559947,1995-0559948 AND 1995- 0559949 ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BY THE TERMS OF A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RECORDED NNE 12, 1997 AS FILE NO. 1997- 0275373 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 14. AN UNRECORDED ALLOCATION AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 22, 1994, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS DISCLOSED BY MEMORANDUM. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PAUL ECKE, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, ELISABETH K. ECKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RAYMOND A. WHITWER, GENEEN PAGE 6 may.\ : \ll if p/f v 7 15 16. ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 L. WHITWER, DAVID N. WHITWER, CRAIG P. WHITWER, CHARLES S. CARTER, CO- TRUSTEE UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982, RUTH DRAPER CARTER, CO- TRUSTEE UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982 AND ENCINITAS TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. RECORDED: DECEMBER 11, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0561223 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN AGREEMENT TO IMPROVE DEVELOPMENT - WATER FACILITIES AGREEMENT NO. A -0024, DATED JULY 17, 1996, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. RECORDED: JULY 18, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996 - 0361000 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO. 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY'&BRMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. AFFECTS: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 75 LYING WITHIN QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. 17. AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES AND /OR MAINS, MANHOLES, SEVR LATERAL PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. AFFECTS: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 75, LYING WITHIN QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. 18. AN EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSEft/ AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO. 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 19. AN EASEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 20. AN AGREEMENT REGARDING AGREEMENT TO IMPROVE SUBDMSION SEWERS, DATED DECEMBER 14, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY. RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996- 0456801 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 1 ORDER NO. 1170880-15 21. AN EASEMENT FOR EITHER OR BOTH POLE LINES, UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 29, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0046663 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN THAT PORTION OF LOT 75 SHOWN AND DELINEATED AS "EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES GRANTED AND ACCEPTED HEREON" (QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AND LEUCADIA BOULEVARD) ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 22. A CABLE TELEVISION CONSTRUCTION WIRING AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 9, 1997, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: DANIELS CABLEVISION, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CARLSBAD RANCH COMPANY, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CHRISTOPHER C. CALKINS AND DIANE M. CALKINS; PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUSTEE, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUST DATED AUGUST 7, 1997; LIZBETH A. ECKE, TRUSTEE OF THE LIZBETH A. ECKE TRUST DATED MARCH 31,1994; P.E. III PROPERTIES, LLC., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND NORTH MESA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. RECORDED: FEBRUARY 19, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0085612 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE ROUTE OR LOCATION OF SAID EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM THE RECORD. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A ASSUMPTION AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1998, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: DANIELS CABLEVISION, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND ENCINITAS RANCH LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. RECORDED: APRIL 17, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 -0216615 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 8 y.� AM F. p, ,. 4 � ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 23. AN AGREEMENT REGARDING CREATING CABLE ACCESS EASEMENT, DATED APRIL 19, 1999, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: BARRATT AMERICAN, INC. AND COXCOM, INC., DBA COX COMMUNICATIONS OF SAN DIEGO, INC. RECORDED: JULY 16, 1999 AS FILE NO. 1999 - 0495473 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 24. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, BUT DELETING ANY COVENANT, CONDITION OR RESTRICTION INDICATING A PREFERENCE, LIMITATION OR DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN TO THE EXTENT SUCH COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS VIOLATE 42 USC 3604(C), IN AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 AS FILE NO. 1999 - 0616746 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SAID INSTRUMENT PROVIDES THAT A VIOLATION THEREOF SHALL NEITHER DEFEAT NOR RENDER INVALID THE LIEN OF ANY MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST MADE FOR VALUE. 25. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL SUM OF $3,360,000.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS OR OBLIGATIONS SECURED THEREBY, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 AS FILE NO. 1999 - 0616747 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: AUGUST 27, 1999 TRUSTOR: BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION TRUSTEE: EQUITABLE DEED COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 26. A OF COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: TENATATIVE MAP, DESIGN REVIEW AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN RECORDED FEBRUARY 1, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000-0051937 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 9 ,.k AMf,ifl , a 1 � LLB' x 1999 -2000 TAX INFORMATION: CODE AREA: PARCEL NO.: 1 ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT: LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPT: 19122 254- 611 -07 -00 $1,257.88 OPEN $1,257.88 OPEN $118,937.00 $-o- $-o- CODE AREA: 19410 PARCEL NO.: 254- 611 -09 -00 I ST INSTALLMENT: $1,139.59 OPEN 2ND INSTALLMENT: $1,139.59 OPEN LAND VALUE: $199,390.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $ -0- EXEMPT: $-o- CODE AREA: PARCEL NO.: 1 ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPT: 19410 254- 611 -10 -00 $1,148.76 OPEN $1,148.76 OPEN $199,390.00 $ -0- $ -0- PAGE 10 ORDER NO. 1170880-15 4S AM 1': ff f ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 75 OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 94 -066 UNITS 4, 5 AND 6, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 13356, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996. OCTOBER 25, 1999 2:25 PM LB PAGE 11 OCT -25 -1999 15:06 HUNSRKER 8 ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P.01i12 HUN SAKE R & ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 5584500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 25, 1999 TO: Jeremy Riddle / Blair Knoll COMPANY: City of Encinitas FAX NO.: 760- 633 -2818 FROM: Dave Viera PROJECT: ET 98 -171 (North Mesa) w.O. #: 294 -132 DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT: Updated PR with $arratt as owner THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ® Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review NO. OF PAGES: 12 including cover sheet COMMENTS: Please call me at ext 405 with any questions. Thank you. ❑ Approval OCT -25 -1999 15:06 HUNSAKER 8 ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P.02i12 r ORDER NO. 117088045 i FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 411 IVY STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 P.O. BOX 808, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92112 (619) 238 -1776 OCTOBER 25, 1999 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES 10179 HUENNEKENS ST., #200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 ATTENTION: MARYBETH MURRAY YOUR REF. NORTH MESA OUR ORDER NO. 1170880-15 IN RESPONSE TO THE HEREIN REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, THIS COMPANY HEREBY REPORTS THAT IT IS PREPARED TO ISSUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, A POLICY OR POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE DESCRIBING THE LAND AND THE ESTATE OR INTEREST THEREIN HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, INSURING AGAINST LOSS WHICH MAY BE SUSTAINED BY REASON OF ANY DEFECT, LIEN OR ENCUMBRANCE NOT SHOWN OR REFERRED TO AS AN EXCEPTION HEREIN OR NOT EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORMS. THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FROM THE COVERAGE OF SAID POLICY OR POLICIES ARE SET FORTH HEREIN. COPIES OF THE POLICY FORMS SHOULD BE READ. THEY ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS REPORT. PLEASE READ THE EXCEPTIONS SHOWN OR REFERRED TO BELOW AND THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS REPORT CAREFULLY. THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS ARE MEANT TO PROVIDE YOU WITH NOTICE OF MATTERS WHICH ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY AND SHOULD BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THIS PRELIIVIINARY REPORT IS NOT A WRITTEN REPRESENTATION AS TO THE CONDITION OF TITLE AND MAY NOT LIST ALL LIENS, DEFECTS, AND ENCUMBRANCES AFFECTING TITLE TO THE LAND. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. DATED AS OF OCTOBER 19, 1999 AT 7:30 A.M GREG SPANIOL - TITLE OFFICER DIRECT DIAL PHO 231 -4656 PAZ NO. 231 -4647 PAGE DCT -25 -1999 15:07 HUNSAKER 8 ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P.03i12 1 �t Aht F. q! C Q l ORDER NO. 1170980-15 THE FORM OF POLICY TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REPORT IS: SUBDIVISION MAP GUARANTEE TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: FEE THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999 -2000, NOW PAYABLE, A LIEN NOT YET DELINQUENT. 2. A BOND ISSUED UNDER THE 1915 ACT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF OLIVENHAIN WATER STORAGE PROJECT, ASSESSMENT NO. 0000, DISTRICT 96 -1, WHICH IS CURRENTLY OR WILL BE COLLECTED ON THE TAX ROLL. IF PAY -OFF IS REQUIRED, THERE WILL BE ADDED FEES, INTEREST AND A PRE -PAY AMOUNT. A DATE OF PAY -OFF WILL HAVE TO BE PROVIDED BY YOU; AS INTEREST IS COMPOUNDED DAILY. PLEASE ALLOW 15 WORKING DAYS, AS A REPORT WILL HAVE TO BE ORDERED FROM AGENCY CONCERNED. 3. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE AND ANY OTf= APPLICABLE STATUTES OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES THE REQUIREMENT THAT THIS COMPANY BE FURNISHED WITH ALL SUPPLEMENTAL TAX BILLS, IF ANY, FROM THE OWNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEFORE CLOSE OF ESCROW. PAGE OCT -25 -1999 15:07 HUNSRKER 8 ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P.04i12 '. ORDER NO. 1170880-15 4. AGREEMENTS REGARDING A LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT ALL DATED JANUARY 6, 1969, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN PAUL ECKE AND MAGDALENA ECKE, HUSBAND AND WIFE AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RECORDED JANUARY 16, 1969 AS FILE NOS. 9496, 9497 AND 9498, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1971 AS FILE NO, 37597 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A SECOND AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT RECORDED APRIL 20, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83- 127425 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A NOTICE OF NON - RENEWAL AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE: 1, CONTRACT NOS: 4444 - 0500-A, 4445 -0500 -A AND 4446- 0500 -A, RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1991 AS FILE NO. 91- 0685465 AND RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1992 AS FILE NOS. 1992 - 0832703, 1992- 0832704 AND 1992 -0832705, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. NOTICE OF NON - RENEWAL ECKE AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE NO. I CONTRACT NO. 67 -3 DOCUMENT NO. 4444 0500 -A WAS RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1992 AS FILE NO. 1992 -0689595 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A CERTIFICATE OF TENTATIVE PARTIAL CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965, CONTRACT NOS. 44440500 -A, 4445 - 0500-A AND 4446- 0500 -A, RECORDED AUGUST 22, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0368222 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 4446- 0500-A, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0418984 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 4444 0500- A, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0418985 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A TURD AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 4445 -0500 -A, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0418986 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A CERTIFICATE OF FINAL PARTIAL CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORnA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965, WHICH WAS RECORDED OCTOBER 12, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0462745 AND CORRECTED OCTOBER 13, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0465149, BOTH OF OFFICIAL. RECORDS. PAGE 3 OCT -25 -1999 15:08 �.�. Atmer,� a b x HUNSAKER 8 ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P.05i12 ORDER NO. 1170980-15 A CERTIFICATE OF TENTATIVE PARTIAL CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965, RECORDED MARCH 27, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996-0150812 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE OR PIPELINES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, TOGETHER WITH SUCH FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS, EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC CORPORATION RECORDED MARCH 3, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81- 063248 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN LOT 75 AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 13356. 6. AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE OR PIPELINES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, TOGETHER WITH SUCH FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS, EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, RECORDED MARCH 25, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81. 089130 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF LOT 75 AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND UTILITY LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF PAUL ECKE, SR., TRUSTEE OF THE PAUL ECKE, SR. TRUST, RECORDED APRIL 18, 1988 AS FILE NO. 88- 178410 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN LOT 75 AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. 8. DEED RESTRICTION DATED OCTOBER 26, 1988 EXECUTED BY PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PAUL JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, PAUL ECKE III, PAUL ECKE SK, TRUSTEE OF THE PAUL ECKE SR. TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1983 AND THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SUBJECTED TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1989 AS FILE NO. 89- 082586 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO, 94-3 OF THE SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994-0488541 AND NOVEMBER 16, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0521630 BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 94-3 OF THE SAN DIEGUIfO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23,19% AS Me No. 1996.04&Uj i pF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 4 OCT -25 -1999 15:08 HUNSAKER 8 ASSOCIATES SD 658 558 4500 P.06i12 ORDER NO. 1170880-15 �3 we rx 10. A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1994, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; PAUL ECKE, JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983; NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; RE.L.S., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; CHARLES S. CARTER AND RUTH DRAPER CARTER, BOTH AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER THE DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2,1982; RAYMOND A. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID N. WHITViTA AN INDIVIDUAL; CRAIG P. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL AND GENEEN L. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL. RECORDED: DECEMBER 14, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994- 0713677 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. AN ASSIGNMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FROM CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LDM7ED LIABILITY COMPANY, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUSTEE, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUST DTD 8/7197, LIZBETH A. ECKE, TRUSTEE OF THE LIZBETH A. ECKE TRUST DATED MARCH 31, 1994 AND NORTH MESA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO ENCINI TAS RANCH LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED MARCH 2, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998-0109370 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 11. AN AGREEMENT FOR ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND FOR PROVISION OF SEWER SERVICE THERETO, DATED APRIL 24, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: PAGE THE LEUCADLA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, A COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; PAUL ECKE, JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983; NORTH MESA LLC, A -�5 -1999 15:09 HLHSAKER & ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P.07i12 A N. It \ 1 lAy- olN"70�3 ORDER NO. 1170880-15 CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; CHARLES S. CARTER AND RUTH DRAPER CARTER, AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED .TUNE 2,1982; RAYMOND A. VVHlJWER AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID N. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; CRAIG P. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND GENEEN L. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL. MAY 30, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0225327 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -39 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS ENCINPI'AS RANCH ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WAS RECORDED JUNE 16, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0254447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 13. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES Wn7HIN THE ENCD41TAS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ENCINITAS RANCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 14, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0299308 AND AUGUST 25, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 -0377363, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY FACILITTES DISTRICT NO. I (ENCINITAS RANCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), WAS RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0377298 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN WHICH RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 1995 AS FILE NO, 1995- 0489781 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SAID PURCHASE AGREEMENT IS SUBORDINATE TO THE DEEDS OF TRUST RECORDED DECEMBER 8, 1995 AS FILE NO. NOS. 1995-0559947,1995-0559948 AND 1995- 0559949 ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BY THE TERMS OF A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RECORDED JUNE 12, 1997 AS FILE NO. 1997- 0275373 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 14. AN UNRECORDED ALLOCATION AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 22, 1994, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS DISCLOSED BY MEMORANDUM. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LnUTED LIABILITY COMPANY, PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PAUL ECKE, JR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AOREWdENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, ELISABETH K. ECKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS Co. TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABMrIY COMPANY, CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RAYMOND A. WHITWER, GENEEN PAGE 6 OCT -25 -1999 15:09 ;N; .� 1 M F. 1, / 0H i "- n ; HUNSAKER 8 ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P.08i12 ORDER NO. 1170980-15 L. WHITWER, DAVID N. WHI-IWER, CRAIG P. WHPIWER, CHARLES S. CARTER, CO- TRUSTEE UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982, RUTH DRAPER CARTER, CO- TRUSTEE UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982 AND ENCINITAS TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. RECORDED. DECEMBER 11, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0561223 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 15. AN AGREEMENT TO IMPROVE DEVELOPMENT - WATER FACILITIES AGREEMENT NO, A -0024, DATED JULY 17, 1996, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. RECORDED: JULY 18, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996 - 0361000 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 16. AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO. 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. AFFECTS: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 75 LYING WITHIN QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE l o uyna az�- 17. AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES AND /OR MAINS, MANHOLES, SEWER LATERAL PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. AFFECTS: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 75, LYING WITHIN QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. 18. AN EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPELINES, OTHER DISTRICT FACILITIES, AND FOR ALL ACCESS PURPOSES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE SAN DIEGUITO MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC AGENCY AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO. 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. AFFECTS: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 75 LYING WITHIN QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. 19. AN EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO. 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 20. AN EASEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. PAGE 7 OCT -25 -1999 15:10 HUNSAKER 8 ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P.09i12 ORDER NO. 1170880-15 21. AN AGREEMENT REGARDING AGREEMENT TO IMPROVE SUBDIVISION SEWERS, DATED DECEMBER 14, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY. RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996- 0456801 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 22. AN EASEMENT FOR EITIER OR BOTH POLE LINES, UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 29, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0046663 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN THAT PORTION OF LOT 75 SHOWN AND DELINEATED AS "EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES GRANTED AND ACCEPTED HEREON" (QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AND LEUCADIA BOULEVARD) ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 23. A CABLE TELEVISION CONSTRUCTION WIRING AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 9, 1997, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: DANIELS CABLEVISION, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CARLSBAD RANCH COMPANY, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CHRISTOPHER C. CALKINS AND DIANE M. CALKINS; PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUSTEE, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUST DATED AUGUST 7, 1997; LIZBETH A. ECKE, TRUSTEE OF THE LIZBETH A. ECKE TRUST DATED MARCH 31, 1994; P.E. III PROPERTIES, LLC., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND NORTH MESA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. RECORDED: FEBRUARY 19, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998-0085612 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THE ROUTE OR LOCATION OF SAID EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM THE RECORD. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A ASSUMPTION AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1998, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: DANIELS CABLEVISION, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND ENCINITAS RANCH LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. RECORDED: APRIL 17, 1998 AS FILE NO, 1998 - 0216615 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE OCT -25 -1999 15:10 .\ AJ1 L v f n HUNSAKER 8 ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P.10i12 ORDER NO. 1170880-15 24. AN AGREEMENT REGARDING CREATING CABLE ACCESS EASEMENT, DATED APRIL 19, 1999, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: BARRATT AMERICAN, INC. AND COXCOM, INC., DBA COX COMMUNICATIONS OF SAN DIEGO, INC. RECORDED: JULY 16, 1999 AS FILE NO. 1999 - 0495473 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 25. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, BUT DELETING ANY COVENANT, CONDITION OR RESTRICTION INDICATING A PREFERENCE, LIMITATION OR DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN TO THE EXTENT SUCH COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS VIOLATE 42 USC 3604(C), IN AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 AS FILE NO, 1999 - 0616746 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SAID INSTRUMENT PROVIDES THAT A VIOLATION THEREOF SHALL NEITHER DEFEAT NOR RENDER INVALID THE LIEN OF ANY MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST MADE FOR VALUE. 26. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL SUM OF $3,360,000.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS OR OBLIGATIONS SECURED THEREBY, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1999 AS FILE NO. 1999 - 0616747 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: AUGUST 27, 1999 TRUSTOR: BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION TRUSTEE: EQUITABLE DEED COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION PAGE OCT -25 -1999 15:10 a HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SD 1999 -2000 TAX INFORMATION: CODE AREA: PARCEL NO.: I ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPT: 19122 254- 611 -07 -00 $1,157.88 OPEN $1,257.88 OPEN $118,937.00 S-0- S-0- CODE AREA: 19410 PARCEL NO.: 254-611 -09-00 1 ST INSTALLMENT: $1,139.59 OPEN 2ND INSTALLMENT: $1,139.59OPEN LAND VALUE: $199,390.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $ -0- EXEMPT: $ -0- CODE AREA: 19410 PARCEL NO.: 254 -611 -10-00 1 ST INSTALLMENT: $1,148.76 OPEN 2ND INSTALLMENT: $1,148.76OPEN LAND VALUE: $199,390.00 IMPROVEMENTS: $ -0- EXEMPT: $-0- PAGE 10 858 558 4500 P.11 /12 ORDER NO. 1170880-15 OCT -25 -1999 15:11 HLNSRKER 8 ASSOCIATES SD 858 558 4500 P.12i12 \ c ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 n LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 75 OF CITY OF ENCINTTAS TRACT NO. 94066 UNTTS 4, 5 AND 6, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 13356, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996. OCTOBER 25. 1999 8:49 AM LB PAGE 1 I TOTAL P.12 AMER, ORDER NO. 1170880 -15 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 411 IVY STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 (619) 23114656 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES 10179 HUENNEKENS ST., #200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 ATTENTION: DAVE VIERA YOUR REFERENCE NO.: NORTH MESA OUR ORDER NO.: 1170880 -15 DATED AS OF: OCTOBER 19, 1999 _720 I THE ABOVE NUMBERED REPORT (INCLUDING ANY SUPPLEMENTS AND /OR AMENDMENTS THERETO) IS HEREBY MODIFIED AND /OR SUPPLEMENTED TO REFLECT THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ITEMS RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE POLICY: XX ITEM NO(S). 18 OF OUR PRELM41NARY REPORT HASIHAVE BEEN DELETED. DATED: OCTOBER 26, 1999 S GREG SPANIOL - ,TITLE OFFICER DIRECT DIAL PHONE 231 -4656 PAX NO. 231 -4647 JLN 10 'S5 11 53PN CITY CF � -VITAS June 10, 1999 F. 2/2 SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT 505 S, VULCAN AVENUE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 -3633 Ms. Dianne Livingston Title Officer First American Title Insurance Company 411 Ivy Street San Diego, California 92112 Dear Ms. Livingston: TOO (619; 633 -2700 (619) 633 -2650 Dave Viera with Hunsaker and Associates has asked me to write you regarding San Dieguito Water District easements within TM 98 -171. The preliminary title report for the property states that there is a District water easement over those portions of Lot 75 lying within Quail Gardens Drive per Map No. 13356. In reviewing Map No. 13356, I have not found any reference to water easements granted within Quail Gardens Drive. In fact, since Quail Gardens Drive was dedicated to the City of Encinitas for public right -of -way, no easements would be needed. Therefore, I believe that Section 19 of the exceptions section of the title report should be removed. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (760) 633 -2849. Sincerely, (,J— oa—, William O'Donnell Water Utility Planner MAY 3 0 ;iJW u NGINEERING SERVICES I ,,((��,, CITY OF ENCINITAS to recycled oaoer =R NO. 1170880 -6 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 411 IVY STREET, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 P.O. BOX 808, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92112 (619) 238 -1776 APRIL 20, 1999 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES 10179 HUENNKENS ST., #200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 ATTN: MARYBETH MURRAY YOUR REF: NORTH MESA -QUAIL HOLLOWS OUR ORDER NO. 1170880 -6 IN RESPONSE TO THE HEREIN REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, THIS COMPANY HEREBY REPORTS THAT IT IS PREPARED TO ISSUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, A POLICY OR POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE DESCRIBING THE LAND AND THE ESTATE OR INTEREST THEREIN HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, INSURING AGAINST LOSS WHICH MAY BE SUSTAINED BY REASON OF ANY DEFECT, LIEN OR ENCUMBRANCE NOT SHOWN OR REFERRED TO AS OR NOT EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORMS. THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FROM THE COVERAGE OF SAID POLICY OR POLICIES ARE SET FORTH HEREIN. COPIES OF THE POLICY FORMS SHOULD BE READ. THEY ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS REPORT. PLEASE READ THE EXCEPTIONS SHOWN OR REFERRED TO BELOW AND THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS REPORT CAREFULLY. THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS ARE MEANT TO PROVIDE YOU WITH NOTICE OF MATTERS WHICH ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY AND SHOULD BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THIS PRELIMINARY REPORT IS NOT A WRITTEN REPRESENTATION AS TO THE CONDITION OF TITLE AND MAY NOT LIST ALL LIENS, DEFECTS, AND ENCUMBRANCES AFFECTING TITLE TO THE LAND. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. DATED AS OF APRIL 14, 1999 AT 7:30 A.M. DIAl LIVINGS ON - TITLE OFFICER DIRECT DIAL PHONE 231 -4654 FAX NO. 231 -4647 1a[tiowl TO . \. 6771 THE FORM OF POLICY TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REPORT IS: SUBDIVISION MAP GUARANTEE TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: ENCINITAS RANCH LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: FEE THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: (SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999 -2000, A LIEN, NOT YET PAYABLE. 2. A BOND ISSUED UNDER THE 1915 ACT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF OLIVENHAIN WATER STORAGE PROJECT, ASSESSMENT NO. 0000, DISTRICT 96 -1, WHICH IS CURRENTLY OR WILL BE COLLECTED ON THE TAX ROLL. IF PAY -OFF IS REQUIRED, THERE WILL BE ADDED FEES, INTEREST AND A PRE -PAY AMOUNT. A DATE OF PAY -OFF WILL HAVE TO BE PROVIDED BY YOU; AS INTEREST IS COMPOUNDED DAILY. PLEASE ALLOW 15 WORKING DAYS, AS A REPORT WILL HAVE TO BE ORDERED FROM AGENCY CONCERNED. 3. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTES OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES: THE REQUIREMENT THAT THIS COMPANY BE FURNISHED WITH ALL SUPPLEMENTAL TAX BILLS, IF ANY, FROM THE OWNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY BEFORE CLOSE OF ESCROW. PAGE 2 ORDER NO. 1170680 -6 4. AN AGREEMENT REGARDING A SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AND OF DISPOSING OF THE SEWAGE AND EFFLUENT WATERS TREATED AT SAID PLANT, DATED APRIL 4, 1963, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: ENCINITAS SANITARY DISTRICT AND PAUL ECKE AND PAUL ECKE JR. RECORDED: APRIL 8, 1963 AS FILE NO. 59949 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. S. AGREEMENTS REGARDING A LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT ALL DATED JANUARY 6, 1969, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS ✓ CONTAINED THEREIN, EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN PAUL ECKE AND MAGDALENA ECKE, HUSBAND AND WIFE AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RECORDED JANUARY 16, 1969 AS FILE NOS. 9496, 9497 AND 9498, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1971 AS FILE NO. 37597 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A SECOND AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT RECORDED APRIL 20, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83- 127425 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A NOTICE OF NON - RENEWAL AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE: 1, CONTRACT NOS: 4444 - 0500 -A, 4445- 0500 -A AND 4446- 0500 -A, RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1991 AS FILE NO. 91- 0685465 AND RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1992 AS FILE NOS. 1992 - 0832703, 1992 - 0832704 AND 1992 - 0832705, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. NOTICE OF NON - RENEWAL ECKE AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE NO. 1 CONTRACT NO. 67 -3 DOCUMENT NO. 4444 - 0500 -A WAS RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1992 AS FILE NO. 1992 - 0689595 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A CERTIFICATE OF TENTATIVE PARTIAL CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965, CONTRACT NOS. 4444 - 0500-A, 4445- 0500 -A AND 4446 - 0500 -A, RECORDED AUGUST 22, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0368222 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 4446 - 0500 -A, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0418984 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 4444 - 0500 -A, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0418985 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 3 ORDER NO. 1170880 -6 A THIRD AMENDMENT TO LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 4445- 0500 -A, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0418986 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A CERTIFICATE OF FINAL PARTIAL CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965, WHICH WAS RECORDED OCTOBER 12, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0462745 AND CORRECTED OCTOBER 13, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0465149, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A CERTIFICATE OF TENTATIVE PARTIAL CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965, RECORDED MARCH 27, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996 - 0150812 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 6. AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE OR PIPELINES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, TOGETHER WITH SUCH FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS, EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF (� OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC CORPORATION RECORDED MARCH 3, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81- 063248 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN LOT 75 AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 13356. 7. AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE OR PIPELINES FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, TOGETHER WITH SUCH FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS, EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF _ OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, RECORDED MARCH 25, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81- 089130 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF LOT 75 AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 8. AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND UTILITY LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF PAUL ECKE, SR., TRUSTEE OF THE f D PAUL ECKE, SR. TRUST, RECORDED APRIL 18, 1988 'AS FILE NO. 88- 178410 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN LOT 75 AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. 9. DEED RESTRICTION DATED OCTOBER 26, 1988 EXECUTED BY PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PAUL JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, PAUL ECKE III, PAUL ECKE SR., TRUSTEE OF THE PAUL ECKE SR. TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 1983 AND THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SUBJECTED TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1989 AS FILE NO. 89- 082586 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 4 ORDER NO. 1170880 -6 10. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 94 -3 OF THE SAN DIEGUITO UNION / HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994 - 0488541 AND NOVEMBER 16, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0521630 BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 94 -3 OF THE SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996 - 0482284 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 11. A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1994, UPON THE TERMS, ✓ COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY I COMPANY; PAUL ECKE, JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983; NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; R.E.L.S., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; CHARLES S. CARTER AND RUTH DRAPER CARTER, BOTH AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER THE DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982; RAYMOND A. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID N. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; CRAIG P. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL AND GENEEN L. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL. RECORDED: DECEMBER 14, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994 - 0713677 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. AN ASSIGNMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FROM CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUSTEE, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUST DTD 8/7/97, LIZBETH A. ECKE, TRUSTEE OF THE LIZBETH A. ECKE TRUST DATED MARCH 31, 1994 AND NORTH MESA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO ENCINITAS RANCH LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED MARCH 2, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0109370 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 5 ORDER NO. 1170880 -6 12. AN AGREEMENT FOR ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND FOR PROVISION OF SEWER SERVICE THERETO, DATED APRIL 24, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, A COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; PAUL ECKE, JR. AND ELISABETH K. ECKE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983; NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; CHARLES S. CARTER AND RUTH DRAPER CARTER, AS CO- TRUSTEES UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982; RAYMOND A. WHITWER; AN INDIVIDUAL; DAVID N. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; CRAIG P. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND GENEEN L. WHITWER, AN INDIVIDUAL. RECORDED: MAY 30, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0225327 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. 13. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -39 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS ENCINITAS RANCH ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WAS RECORDED JUNE 16, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0254447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 14. THE FACT THAT SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE ENCINITAS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ENCINITAS RANCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) , AS DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 14, 1995 AS FILE NO. - 1995 - 0299308 AND AUGUST 25, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0377363, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (ENCINITAS RANCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS), WAS RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0377298 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. A FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN WHICH RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995 - 0489781 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE 6 ORDER NO. 1170880 -6 SAID PURCHASE AGREEMENT IS SUBORDINATE TO THE DEEDS OF TRUST RECORDED DECEMBER 8, 1995 AS FILE NO. NOS. 1995- 0559947, 1995- 0559948 AND 1995 - 0559949 ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BY THE TERMS OF A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RECORDED JUNE 12, 1997 AS FILE NO. 1997- 0275373 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 15. AN UNRECORDED ALLOCATION AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 22, 1994, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS DISCLOSED BY MEMORANDUM. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: NORTH MESA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PAUL ECKE RANCH, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PAUL ECKE, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, ELISABETH K. ECKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO- TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 7, 1983, P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RAYMOND A. WHITWER, GENEEN L. WHITWER, DAVID N. WHITWER, CRAIG P. WHITWER, CHARLES S. CARTER, CO- TRUSTEE UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982, RUTH DRAPER CARTER, CO- TRUSTEE UNDER DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED JUNE 2, 1982 AND ENCINITAS TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. RECORDED: DECEMBER 11, 1995 AS FILE NO. 1995- 0561223 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 16. AN AGREEMENT TO IMPROVE DEVELOPMENT - WATER FACILITIES AGREEMENT NO. A -0024, DATED JULY 17, 1996, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. RECORDED: JULY 18, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996- 0361000 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 17. AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO. 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. AFFECTS:I THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 75 LYING WITHIN QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. PAGE 7 1 ORDER NO. 1170880 -6 19. AN EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPELINES, OTHER DISTRICT FACILITIES, AND �( FOR ALL ACCESS PURPOSES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE �KE�ESms SAN DIEGUITO MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC AGENCY A �A� ,!' tk DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO. 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS �v�1 AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. ' °' ph f- `I: AFFECTS: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 75 LYING WITHIN QUAIL GARDENS (� DRIVE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. 20. AN EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO. 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 1. AN EASEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. Re�nevE EV 'lbz RvtE" 7 22. AN AGREEMENT REGARDING AGREEMENT TO IMPROVE SUBDIVISION SEWERS, DATED DECEMBER 14, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY. RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996- 0456801 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 23. AN EASEMENT FOR EITHER OR BOTH POLE LINES, UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY BY f j INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 29, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0046663 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN THAT PORTION OF LOT 75 SHOWN AND j� DELINEATED AS "EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES GRANTED AND ACCEPTED HEREON" (QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AND LEUCADIA BOULEVARD) ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. PAGE 8 18. AN EASEMENT FOR SEWER PIPELINES AND /OR MAINS, MANHOLES, SEWER LATERAL LEUCADIA PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. AFFECTS: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 75, LYING WITHIN QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. 19. AN EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPELINES, OTHER DISTRICT FACILITIES, AND �( FOR ALL ACCESS PURPOSES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE �KE�ESms SAN DIEGUITO MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC AGENCY A �A� ,!' tk DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO. 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS �v�1 AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. ' °' ph f- `I: AFFECTS: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 75 LYING WITHIN QUAIL GARDENS (� DRIVE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. 20. AN EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON MAP NO. 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 1. AN EASEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED ON 13356, SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. Re�nevE EV 'lbz RvtE" 7 22. AN AGREEMENT REGARDING AGREEMENT TO IMPROVE SUBDIVISION SEWERS, DATED DECEMBER 14, 1995, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT AND CARLTAS COMPANY. RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 9, 1996 AS FILE NO. 1996- 0456801 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 23. AN EASEMENT FOR EITHER OR BOTH POLE LINES, UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS IN FAVOR OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY BY f j INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 29, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0046663 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LOCATED WITHIN THAT PORTION OF LOT 75 SHOWN AND j� DELINEATED AS "EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES GRANTED AND ACCEPTED HEREON" (QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE AND LEUCADIA BOULEVARD) ON SAID MAP NO. 13356. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. PAGE 8 �9 ORDER NO. 1170880 -6 24. A CABLE TELEVISION CONSTRUCTION WIRING AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 9, 1997, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: DANIELS CABLEVISION, INC., A J tvlj e RECORDED: FEBRUARY 19, 1998 AS RECORDS. DELAWARE CORPORATION AND CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CARLSBAD RANCH COMPANY, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; CHRISTOPHER C. CALKINS AND DIANE M. CALKINS; PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUSTEE, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUST DATED AUGUST 7, 1997; LIZBETH A. ECKE, TRUSTEE OF THE LIZBETH A. ECKE TRUST DATED MARCH 31, 1994; P.E. III PROPERTIES, LLC., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND NORTH MESA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. FILE NO. 1998 - 0085612 OF OFFICIAL THE ROUTE OR LOCATION OF SAID EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM THE RECORD. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. A ASSUMPTION AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 24, 1998, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: RECORDED: APRIL 17, 1998 AS RECORDS. DANIELS CABLEVISION, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION AND ENCINITAS RANCH LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY- COMPANY_ FILE NO. 1998-021661 5.,6F OFFICIAL I �nv6 PAGE 9 ORDER NO. 1170880 -6 25. A DEED OR TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL SUM OF $9,877,567.00, RECORDED MARCH 2, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0109371 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: MARCH 2, 1998 TRUSTOR: ENCINITAS RANCH LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TRUSTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: CARLTAS COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUSTEE, PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUST DTD 8/7/97, LIZBETH A. ECKE, TRUSTEE OF THE LIZBETH A. ECKE TRUST DATED MARCH 31, 1994 AND NORTH MESA, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AFFECTS LOT 75 WITH OTHER PROPERTY. 26. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL SUM OF $4,000,000.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS OR OBLIGATIONS SECURED THEREBY, RECORDED MARCH 2, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998- 0109372 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: MARCH 2, 1998 TRUSTOR: ENCINITAS RANCH, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TRUSTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BENEFICIARY: PRESNAR INVESTMENTS, LTD. A COMPANY ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE BAHAMAS AFFECTS LOT 75 WITH OTHER PROPERTY. 27. AN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND LEASES, DATED MARCH 2, 1998, AS ADDITIONAL SECURITY FOR THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDED MARCH 2, 1998_ AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0109373 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. EXECUTED BY ENCINITAS RANCH LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO PRESNAR INVESTMENTS, LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE BAHAMAS AND RECORDED MARCH 2, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0109373 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 28. A FINANCING STATEMENT FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER SHOWING: DEBTOR: ENCINITAS RANCH LLC SECURED PARTY: PRESNAR INVESTMENTS, LTD. DATE FILED: NONE SHOWN RECORDED: MARCH 2, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998- 0109374 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PROPERTY COVERED: AS DESCRIBED THEREIN. AFFECTS LOT 75 WITH OTHER PROPERTY. PAGE 10 29 ORDER NO. 1170880 -6 A INTERCREDITOR AGREEMENT DATED JUNE, 1988, UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS, AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN: PRESNAR INVESTMENTS, LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE BAHAMAS AND IMPERIAL BANK, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. RECORDED: JULY 13, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998- 0430287 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR FURTHER PARTICULARS. CODE AREA: PARCEL NO.: 1ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT: LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPT: CODE AREA: PARCEL NO.: 1ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT: LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPT: CODE AREA: PARCEL NO.: 1ST INSTALLMENT: 2ND INSTALLMENT: LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPT: 19122 254- 611 -07 -00 $1,213.34 PAID $1,213.34 PAID $110,543.00 $-o- $-o- 19410 254- 611 -09 -00 $1,064.05 PAID $1,064.05 PAID $185,729.00 $-o- $-o- 19410 254- 611 -10 -00 $1,073.22 PAID $1,073.22 PAID $185,729.00 $-o- $-o- PAGE 11 ORDER NO. 1170880 -6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 75 OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 94 -066 UNITS 4, 5 AND 6, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 13356, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996. PAGE 12 r - 11K�`b53 —t5 Y6CC??T?a �'&U347 DP 1TBST AICAIOIA 6[(3➢I1FQla r1PBIIB 7>$PB�l9T 1657 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: AND MAL TAX STATEMENTS TO: ENCINITAS RANCH LLC 4365 EXECUTIVE DRIVE, STE. 600 SAN DIEGO, CA 92008 ATTN: URE R. KRETONLCZ DOG # 1998- _09369 Mar 02, 1998 4.06 PM OFFICIAL REMO SAN DIEGO MM COW'S TM1 GFQ'gCi J. 9091 Con Ri S ET FEES: 4200 DC: Af E-7— TM: N.D. V-u't 4AVN APN: 254- 614 -01602 254- 613 -03 SPAC9 ABOVE Tns LNE FOE REM 's USE 254- 611 -04 254 -610 -02603 254- 611 - 07,09610 FW"; 211d104C The undersigned granior(s) dectare(s): Documentary transfer tax is S [REFORM PER SEPARATE NONDISCLCSLRE STATEMENT]. () computed on full value of property conveyed, or () computed on full value less value of liens and encumbrances remaining at time of sale. () Unincorporated area ( x ) City of Encinitas, and FOR vALUE RECEIVED, CARLTAS COMPANY, a Califmma limited partnersbip, P.E. M PROPERTIES LLC, a CaWorma limited liability comfy, PAUL ECKE, JR, TRUSTEE, PAUL ECKE, JIL, TRUST DTD SI7197, LUMM A- ECKE, TRUSTEE OF THE LIWETH A. ECKE TRUST DATED MARCH 31,1994, NORTH MESA, LLC, a California limited liability company (coUwtrvely "Grantor-), hereby grants to ENCE41TAS RANCH LLC, a California limited liability compa,ty ('Grantee), that certain real property (the "Property") situated in or about the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, described on Schedule 1 attached hereto and by this reference incorporated berem. ffvtV %Tw,d.doc I� THE PROPERTY IS CONVEYED TO GRANTEE SUBJECT TO all liens, encumbrances, easemcnt, covenants, conditions and restrictions and other mattes of record, all of which matters are specifically incorporated herein by this reference and shall be a burden upon and inure to the benefit of the Property. Grantor. CARLTAS COMPANY, a California P.E. III PROPERTIES LLC, a limited partnership California bmitetl liabihry company By:_ Paul Ec c M, Tnntee of the Paul Ecke III Revocable Trust dated September 22, 1989 r � LVM A. EC[�, TRUSTEE F L1J7'H A. ECKE TRUST i i31,1994 By: Caritas Management. a California corporation AUL EM, JR., TRUS"E OF THE 'PAUL ECKE, JR., TRUST DATED AUGUST 7,1997 ATTACH NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORMS mriV a \gmVdAm 1659 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) On UA"q (� 1998, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared CHRISTOPHER C. CALKINS [4 personally known to me or j ] proved to rue on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person* whose namc(s) isle subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that heighe4ey executed the same in his4m4heir authorized capacity( *, and that by hishm4hair sigiatmo(s) on the vauument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(e) acted, executed the imtrmtent WITNESS my band and official seal. f/7 (SEAL) _ • I Notary PLekftri MrtzmnBp��vlta7� STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) On &4ZUt..W �/ 19 , 1998, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared PAUL ECKE III [A personally known to me or [ ] proved to me on the bass of satisfactory evidence to be the person(@) whose name(@) Wa a subscribed to the within instrimretit. and acknowledged to me that ha4a4he5 executed the same in his ea authorized capacity(iea), and that by his4wkheir signature(s) on the instrument the persona), or the entity upon behalf of which WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) KAREN A. PHBM t.mllnlciion � I I69a7� NWM WbAe • CorMNo Sm Nepo COLN* lewca Fiplw"Id,= mrblrrcsualg=id.dw STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) 1680 On g/3R,UKV I9 1998 before me, the undersigned Notary Public, gasonally appear-ad PAUL ECKE, IR, 64 personally known tome or [ ) proved to mean the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(e) whose name(e) Were subscribed to the within instmment, and acknowledged to me that ho4o4;3ey executed the same in his,%&4h%E authorized capacityfies), and that by hislhcvAhw signatures) on the instrument the person(, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(o acted, executed the ftu& lmenL WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) KAREN A,i"T COTmir{ien M 1167073 z NotQY Puok -CWWft f_ Son Dlbp c4 1%WCtrM5*Wjm14L= STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) On N73eUAe-y I q, 1998, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared LIZBETH A. ECIE Kpersonally known to me or [ ) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons) whose name(s) iska subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that WshM* executed the same ¢u hi&� authorized capacity(ies), and that by h6baAbe r signauae(94 on the instrument the petsoo(e), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(e) acted wtecuted the ittsfrwnent. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (SEAL) OcurvnlWm s 1 16M Noklv kok - Cab-rd, KVCmM Dow imon e.7m2 mrbVe��td.dw i SCHEDULE 1 to 1661 GRANT DEED That certain real property in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, described as follow: LOTS 48, 49, 56, 67, 71, 72, AND 75 OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 94-066 UNITS 4, 5, AND 6, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP TI-IEREOF NO. 13356, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1996. mrb gwtd.e« It 641123/1999 12:09 619231' 'T FIRST APERICaN r "1 MM. 177 TI!®P 'tea w T" ; I DOC # 1998- 0085612 l R MDINQREQUESI't:DBYAND; I • Feb L9, 19413 +:74 PM wF EN RECORDED 11MIL TQ it '� ' 8 z i U F1CSF! lEm 0 DID MR KMB'U NU Datllefa OebleWs tno. ? , tiEBilkt J. UKITH, ff KY , ATTN: Corpatate 00' s !r FEE: 38.00 v 6720 Et Camino Red,i r� i OC: iC i tllYffis 2 DOCUMENTARY'rR,ANSFER TAX $ 0 Danlete Cableviskon, Inc. �L it I 9Y: FOR COUNTY USE ONLY CA13LE TELENSION CONSTRUCTION WIRING AGRFEMENT ANO EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT Is made and entered into as of DECEMBER 1997, by and between DANIELS CABLEVISION, INC., a Delaware Corporation ("Company") and LT MP s ifo ri ('0wrars). RECITALS t.. The Company holds a Franchise permit or other authcr;ty for, and owns and operates a cable r television system wtthln the Town of ENCIMTAS, and Owner owns the real property and trnprovemem known asRNCiNITAS RANCH jMZ No 940ee1 consitling of approximately 510 units, end located gouth of aCosta A_ve &E I e (- Deveiopmenty, the iegel description of which Is attached terato as Exhiblt'M and incorporated herein by reference, WHER°AS, Owner des Tres to have cable television service available at the dweiling units of the Developmem and Company desires to provide such services to the dwelling units. NOW, THEREFORE, In considereUon of the mutual covenants, oondhlons, and agreements CON"rerl %y :.haein, and for other valuable consideration, the parties agree as foAows', lNffALLATION. The Comparry agrees to tnswil in the utility benches or other areas as raqured byslyatern design, all tacllitleF. excepting Interior wlrtng, necessary to transmit tWevlelon signals to and , I � �r t , ME i , it ilt: j 98.85612 k, Page 1 of 9 comment PAGE 12 I I i I I i I I I I I I f r d! 04/23/1999 12:89 629231 FIRST ANERICAN b 928 within all the dwelling units w thin the Development The installation will include but not be !Imhed to, cable and amplifiers, line splitting devices, mnduh, amplifier housing end all fadlities related thereto (the'Faellltleay. Company agrees to install both V and r conduits as specified on design. As soon as posslhts, Owner shall ptevide to Company a legible eat of plans for gas end electricity facilities al 'tha Devalopment Owner agrees to provide all udlity trenches and bacIC,INng of said Venches at no cost to the Company. When Owner places utility trenches at eteet crossings prier to performing trenchfng on other portions of the Development, Comparry shall provide Owner with male dais only and Owner shell place them at the street crossings. Owner shall provide to Company at best two (2) business days' notice of tAiltry trench opening. In the event Owner requests that Company replada or relocate wdsting faailiues at the Development, Owner shall roimburas Company for all costa for the replacemeM undargrounding or relocation. 2. PBEYMIRING. When the dwelling units being constructed by the Owner reach the stage where electrical wking Is necessary, the Compel agrees to furnish standard prewlra materiels, specifications end design prints for the purpose of prewring each dwelling unit with up to live (5) outlets per unit The Owner agrees to prewirs each dwelling urtt to all Company specifications, includ!ng, but not limited to, cable, wall plates anc all praviro matarlals. Owner shall pfovlde to Company a 1151 of dwelling unit addresses when It becomes available. 3. GRANT OF EASENE T. By execution of this Agreement OWr1er hereby grants to Compar.y and its successors and assigns an eacemem and right- cf-way aver, across, along and under the Development for the purpose of Installing, constructing, reconstructing, repairing, replacing, operating, maintaining or removing Facilities. Company shell have the further fight to enter upon the real oent lands of the Owner for access to the light-of-way end for all purposes in connection with providing cable television service to the Development The Owner represents and warrants that It is the Owner of the Development and has the right to grant easement. This easement shell Inure to ea benal'A of and be binding upon the respective heirs, personal representatives, successoro and assigns of the parties hereto, and shall remain In full force and effect so long as the right- of-way shalt be udlized for the purposes for whim this easement is granted. 4. OWNERSHIP OF THE FAGLITIES, Title to all of the Facilities Installed In the Development pursuant to th's Agreement shed at all timas be and remain vested in the Company. 1� SUPERVISION. Owner agrees to provide supervision over" coordination among the various contractors working in and about the Development in order to prevent damage to the CornpFrly's Faellides. Any expense to Company due to damage b Fae91[les caused by the Owner, Its contractors, agents or subcontractors, WIN be billed to and promptly paid for by the Owner. ;T. AUTHORITY OF OWNER. The Owner warrants that A has title to the property an which the Complex is located and is authorized to enter Into this Agreement, or, If the execution of this Agreement Is not by Owner, We signatory is the authodzed agent of Owner. Tads Agreement . • n^n•ti Ass the begat, valid and binding obligation of Owner . l i' j1 I i i f Order. EXP -0006- 00035855 '3 r i it ttyyi Description: 98.85612 Page 2 o! 9 Coalmen!: 1 i PAf E I I 13 I' l� 1. i /1999 12,09,' 1. 6 9231 ' � FIRST ML�RICQN � F 1 i� j I I� •` 929 g, IN EMNIECAn(24, Colmperry shall hold harmless and indemnity Owner and its principals, partners, ettillates, officers, directors, agent and employees from and against any and al! damage or claims for damage asserted by reason of Company'& installation and maintenance of the Equipment in the Complex (except loss or damage arcing tram any negligent or willful act or omission of owner, Its agents or employees) or the material bream of any representation, warranty or covenant made by Camp" in this Agreement. Owner shall hold harmless and Indemnity Company and Its principaie, penners, attillates, officers, directors, agents and employees from and against any and all damage or claims for damage otat may be asserted by reason of the ownership, use or occupancy at the Complex by Nner, its agents or employees (except los or damage arising from any negligent or willful act or omission of Company, its agents or employees) or the material breach of arty representation, warranty or covenant made by Owner In this Agreement It either party is obllgated to Incur calm In orderto enforce any provision¢ of this Agreement, the prevailing party shell be entitled to reimbursement for all reasanabla coats so Incurred, Including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. S. pUTUREOk�LOPIvIENf. Owner agrees to give the Company, reasonable advance mitten notice of its intention to undertake any new davelopmertl adjacent to the Development end grants to the Company the option to Instatl its facilities as get forth in this Agreement by Milan notice to Owner. The Company agrees to notify the Owner In writing within sixty (e0) days of receiving said notice from Owner of the Company's election to install its cable television system in such new development 10, TEFM. The farm of this Agreement shall Commence on the date entered above and continue in effect consistent with the tans of the Franchise and /or any raneHtals and ex!gnsians thereof. 11. NOTICES AND PAYMENTS. Any notices or other communications provided for herein shall be delivered at the addresses set forth below or at any other address which may be specified in writing by the panics hereto. 12 GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement is governed by and shall be construed in accordance with U» laws of the State of California. 13. ENTIREAGREEMENT, This Agrserrre�: cor-stitutes this entire und erranding between the parties and contains all the covenants made between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement supersedes any and an other agreements by either party, either oral ar in writing, with respect to the subjeot matter hereof. l!�14 AMpNINdENTS. This Agreement may be emended, changed or modiEed aNy by written t I �NtN W'Ornerrt executed by the parties hereto. ASSIGNMEtIT. This Agrgoment shall be Whaling upon and inure to the benefit of the wore, assigns and !pairs of the panles hereto, artier. EXP -0006- 00035855 Description: 98.8581? Page 3 of 9 comment: 3 i PAGE 14 I t I It jj;, L 1�11i 1 ;I_, i C t•; l' P.E- DI PROPHRTMS LLC, • CoUtnuia 11mlted Ibabtllty company Br Paul E ke. EL Tiultfte of the Put Eke T4cvb,%,bIc Taut dead Sep ®b 69• In Ma 006 LIa F ' ! U. M. TRM DATED AYIOUST 7, 1997 S IL jjI w. ECICE, xItU9TIX Or t •I`1 .. >SIT! A. YCKE TRUST DATED MAACE 76104 ADDRM! 5600 Avery Encins, Seim 100 Culabid. CA 97009 SI6t1ATIRES CUIi LFED UN NEXT PACE alver: EXP- 0006.00035855 i r j Descript /o n: 98.85612 Page 4 of 9 Comment 4 04/23/1999 12:09 61923 FIRST AMERICAN , k i i• 1� I4r ' ��it i {�� l' IN wT(4 M WHEREOF, the parties have exenaed this Agreement as of the day emd year first above wdtwL C ANY: DANIBLS CA12LEMSION, INC. OWNERS: CARLTAS COtaANY, s Czl*mm limiitd paataentup t� r $r. Cafttat Maae`emcnt, a caW nic" •I. �_ i ail j 1p I dvf afll Q1 /Pfesi nt end GOneml Manager AD ES . 5726 E{ Camina Real ;?to, cCarlsbad, CA 9200B CARIES AD RANCF COMPANY, LP.. aCafiS 1km.A putomkip Ijl Br. Calm cempae7, a Califereia ttinfted partnmbip, lu General By, cLdtu Managaaant,a I It jj;, L 1�11i 1 ;I_, i C t•; l' P.E- DI PROPHRTMS LLC, • CoUtnuia 11mlted Ibabtllty company Br Paul E ke. EL Tiultfte of the Put Eke T4cvb,%,bIc Taut dead Sep ®b 69• In Ma 006 LIa F ' ! U. M. TRM DATED AYIOUST 7, 1997 S IL jjI w. ECICE, xItU9TIX Or t •I`1 .. >SIT! A. YCKE TRUST DATED MAACE 76104 ADDRM! 5600 Avery Encins, Seim 100 Culabid. CA 97009 SI6t1ATIRES CUIi LFED UN NEXT PACE alver: EXP- 0006.00035855 i r j Descript /o n: 98.85612 Page 4 of 9 Comment 4 , k i i• 1� I4r ' ��it i {�� t I . t� r •I. �_ i ail j 1p I I It jj;, L 1�11i 1 ;I_, i C t•; l' P.E- DI PROPHRTMS LLC, • CoUtnuia 11mlted Ibabtllty company Br Paul E ke. EL Tiultfte of the Put Eke T4cvb,%,bIc Taut dead Sep ®b 69• In Ma 006 LIa F ' ! U. M. TRM DATED AYIOUST 7, 1997 S IL jjI w. ECICE, xItU9TIX Or t •I`1 .. >SIT! A. YCKE TRUST DATED MAACE 76104 ADDRM! 5600 Avery Encins, Seim 100 Culabid. CA 97009 SI6t1ATIRES CUIi LFED UN NEXT PACE alver: EXP- 0006.00035855 i r j Descript /o n: 98.85612 Page 4 of 9 Comment 4 Order 55 Description• 98.85612 Page 5cfe Comment 11 } 04/23/1999 12:09 r t 619231' f 932 FIRST AMERICAN ' ') EXHIBIT A f ! i Attached to and Fomling a Pert of the Cable Television Construction Widng Agreement and Easement dated DECEMBEA 9. 1997 between OANIELS CABLEVISION, INC., as Company j and { ,LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3. ENCINI_TAaRAN_CH.': t F 'LOW 48, 49, 50, 51. 56, 82, 87, 71, 72, and 75 of Encinitas Tra_ut No, 94,068, Units 4, 5 and 6, in the City of EndNtas. County, of 13er1 Olago, State of Callfornie, according to Map thereof No. 13355, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Dlego, September 4, 1999. i , I IfagCql'' " � Page 6 of 9 Comment: a PAC= 1' 04/23/1999 12:09 619231 FIRST AhETIC44 I rm 933 ir'i�a� ., "9uteoe �4e- tFOQ1Jrf} ,uGCtmryct btE62` :j �� ;�l` Ort �cc.�6u- q�;49�befo re me, �{V�6; A11 (4 3. (i�CA'i.1tK, �Jo-,9 -ny P ✓AtrC delta Name, Title of Officer personalty appeared _ f.-rJ ( Name of Signers) I J-persona;ly known to me - OR - droved to me on the bass of at' lsfacory avldenaa to" the '.:gerson,(a}"wh ace rtamajaj aro au ribed the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that t shelliffy executed the same int to authorized capaclry(les), and that by (@/hegthpr elgnaturg(aton the iPstrl ent the PersoriW,, or the entJty upon behalf of which he person(Oracted t executed the 117130 tnant ce�,l NlTNESS my hand and official seal. Molert� -eeear '" <an depo CoaLy :q ;� wtsm�.Emrm n�atv7►� p . l�.ylri.r� -c� T.rS�Gthtti kimruins of Notary -a i ,;•: � Stateet ^rittF6�t31r� i Ceuruy of '- AQ ) to C� 0 _ f On hr�"r4n or 9. 9 before me, OVO (A 5 t1ECfC�1r� /JoT%{�7 ✓its 41 C. r- t date Name. Title of Officer personally appeared /_� *lS-1zP� C. OhLtCrtiK t y Name of Signer($) i 0o ersonally known to me • OR - ___proved to me on the basis of satlufamory evidence to be the r t' al9 s whose nam s 1 t,. ;. (j afsjrTiij.re 9ubecrtbed m the witltn instrument and ocknorAedged ro me hffi ;>•., t elthey executed the same in(ENtterlthelr authorized capaciryoas), and that by iss erJtheir ei0rtetur*Y"n the instrument the persoa(e. or the antity upon behalf of which the Persona) a.:ted. executed the instrument. �Il F4iTT iiiii s lea WITNESS my hand and official seal. kelWY1114 C -CdLeN i or Notary I'� J 1 l t it Page 7 of 9 Comment iS I, PAGE i i i 1 "i 1f3 � I I II gem we 1999 12:09 State of A CoLr(ty of s Ij ?31' '7! I . 934 I. I FIRST AMERICAN ' 'I On . Dae� r3eie AO i�997 besore me, .!�R/CC7�1 A Pfa�/�5 n , / R i' den • �� Name, Title of Orricer Personally epoearedl GAUL E64C � _ � / II ' I Nerve of Signer($) �pefeonmay fatoL 20!Itm - . _ .. person whosenam ,`.r. -,•'_ . - -- {�' _ � �ftra suhacrlbmd b the within Instrument and acknowledged to ma :` t94400W executed the same in(fJajherJyteir aulhorized capacirygas), and that b•.w?�__..._, sionatzeM on the Instn:ment the ereon ' vv p jn), or the entity upon behalf otwhich the persan(Sj an r executed the iretnrrmant. i Karen A. Phelps ccrtntttatN2s WITNESS my hand }rid offci iI� of Notary / } Gute of /r/JlaFt nl rA 4 County of 7JE66 On before ma; %i f1. PR�zf'S t fatwC� Bate Name, Titfe of Offcer t:... . pe•so rally appeared L/ EC1GC: _. Nerve of 5igner(s) _.._. Zperzonally known to me • -e to ua "Ole parse wioee rrarrte� 08" subseAbed to the w)thln lnStNment end ack- tow!edged to Me that ! .hs Spiry rey executed the same in *slT their authorized capaclty({ee), and that by r� ' ftnattrrgW or. the instrument the person(*, or the Wry upon Nhaff of which the parsoa(e acted, 1 t asc`utgd the instrument •:�: t Phel 9 WTNESS my hand and official— r•�• s i Karen A. Phelps ccrtntttatN2s WITNESS my hand }rid offci iI� of Notary / } Gute of /r/JlaFt nl rA 4 County of 7JE66 On before ma; %i f1. PR�zf'S t fatwC� Bate Name, Titfe of Offcer t:... . pe•so rally appeared L/ EC1GC: _. Nerve of 5igner(s) _.._. Zperzonally known to me • -e to ua "Ole parse wioee rrarrte� 08" subseAbed to the w)thln lnStNment end ack- tow!edged to Me that ! .hs Spiry rey executed the same in *slT their authorized capaclty({ee), and that by r� ' ftnattrrgW or. the instrument the person(*, or the Wry upon Nhaff of which the parsoa(e acted, 1 t asc`utgd the instrument •:�: t Phel 9 WTNESS my hand and official— SigRytGta of Notary 7 d j. 98.85612 Page a of 9 Comment RARE 19 t � ly•I � � ,I I) I il. tl Order EXP- 0006 - 00035866 3 pescrfptior y SigRytGta of Notary 7 d j. 98.85612 Page a of 9 Comment RARE 19 �I •I t q it11999 12i109 i j 61923 '7 i FIRST AMERICAN 1 .,935 �, env. L�1r�'erfou�re -�1 �a l�v.�ol ;e. p , 16v, Nema, Title of Officer Name of Signer(s) ascribed tc the within tnstfurnent and acknow 2120d to Mee VW hWhen'fhek Iulharized caPSCitY;0i Intl Mt by #,Whe Akeir 3rsorIM, or the eni upon behalf of which the oareorot aciod, order. WITNESS my hand and official seat. 5 ratu r of Notary { 9tateot 1V�AL r F9�n r%�" County of {I ; On f /�i. efonma, /c dat J n Name, Tite at Officer Paogasv appeared Name of Sionsr(s) etaonetty known tome - OR - _p oi9atisreetary- s�!dgrtu� to be ft dn� whose rtamejs) is(asEst hacrtbgd to the within Instrument end eakn�ledged to me etat iala executed the same In 9 y` the pTttttrheyhel`uthorcced capaaty(ie5�and that by his[her sl natur an the insKtument the ereon a}, awe entity upon behalf of wTi the person(s) executed the i ent, emu• txi►ivrrwe WITNESS my, hand and otecia�t seel. I i Signature Page 9 of 9 e5 Comment I PAGE 20 � 11 it I I i i L, i f I I liltll r i 4 04/23/1999 12:09 619231' -'7 e PAquwWby San Diego Ou & Elechic Compc:y ' When recer" mail m; P.O. Box 1831 San Diego, CA 92112 Attu: Offic: Savior, ES S FIRST AMERICAN ' ,1) szs DQC # 1996 - 0046663 Jan 29, 1998 3:07 PH 1 OFICI(L FE(XRYO SM OIU mwlr EMM'S OFFICE r, lxr J. M m im FEmpsat FM! 34.00 o� la SPACE. Tmnfa Tax NM 4 ( i SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY O .F lly 151350 EASQv>m*E CMS C. CALKINS end DFANS M. CALKINS, R-EL, INC. a Cafffomia oarpa akin, OPEN SPACE HOLDING LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. P.E, iQ PROPERTIES LLC, a California Limited liabiliry Company, CARLTAS COMPANY, a C+Ilforaia Liatited Partrterabtp, NORTH MESA LLC, a California Limited Liability, ENCINiTAS RANCH GOLF AUTHORITY, a Joint Exercise of Powers Agency Duly t OeIDmiud and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Cal fortda (Greater), Brenta to SAN I DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, a carpornrlan (Otllotoe), as Wflanea and right of way 1' in, upon, over, under sod across the lands hereinafter described, to erat, construc4 change the SLID of. hnprove, rewosatut, telocate, repair, m®tein and ust facilitir canning of, I. Underground facilities andapputtenaacas forthe transmission and diatibuaon of electricity, 2. Pipelines and appurtrnances for my and all purposes. 3. Communication facilities, and appzbetwon Thor above facilities will he installed at Sunb locations and elevations opal along. over and under dw berch afb:rr described easement as 6n rw may now or haaafta de® ooaveldent m neemeary. Grantee also has the right of ingreai and egress, to, from and along ttds casement in. upon, over sad across the hereinxN described lands. Grantee Ntthar has the righ4 but not the duty to elar and keep this —e art clear from explosives, buildings, stwho s said materials. waft. Iff"OCI Order EXP- 0006-00035855 I PA — I Desatptlon: 98.46663 Page 1 of 10 Comment PACE 02 ! i r I E 04/23/1999 12:09 61923' '7 a :10 COLA 29111111111111111hil The property In which this eastri Y Ad right of way Is hereby granted is simared in the County of San Diego. State of Califomis, described a follows: • Lon 50, 54, 63, 67, 70, 71.72 and 73 of City of Encinew Tract No. 94 - 066, Units 4, 5 and 6, alxvrding to Map thereof No. 13356, filed in the Office of the Comity Recorder of said County of San Diego. The easement m the aforesaid lands shall be more particularly described in .I Pmocb "A", "B' and "C" as fvllvws: Fasroal *A": e t "4 .f '[hose portions of said Lots 54, 63, 67, 70, 71, 72 and 75, shown and ! delineated ae "6ASla'MENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES P GRANTED AND ACCEPTED HEREON" (QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE and LEUCADIA BOULEVARD) on said Map No. 13356. L4: c ! Paeeel "B ": T Within acrd Lot $0, mat attain strip Of l and 50.00 feet in width, lying adjeeml m, coincident with and Northerly of the following described rcfetu ce line p' Beginning at the most Westerly oxnef of said Lot 50; thenca along the Southerly line theeof South W 54' 21" Fast, 167.34 feet (record); thence South 899 23' 11" East $31.86 feat (record). The Northerly tine of the above described 50.00 foot strip of land shall be langthenad and/or shortened so m to timninafe in the Nirrthweetnfy and Easterly tines of � said Lot 50, rl• Grntor SMH not erect place or oonstrnat, nm perrnit to be erected, pieced or ,OMMU tod, any building or other atY "W*, plant any ten, drill or dig any well, within this easement. GrWor shall not tnneaee or decrease the ground twrflx clevltdons within this ass ®art shier matelledon of Graote ses facilities, without prior written oor mt of Gtarrae, which coaxal shall not unreasonably be withheld. Grantor f,arha grans to Granter tha right to aastgn any or all to the rights gramed in this easement in *bole or in part to other companies providing udlrty Or communication faeilnestservleea Grimes "I have the right but not the duty, to trim or renrwo treat aid hvsh along or adjacent to this easenlmt and remove roots from within this easement whenever Pepe 2 of fO 814z" Itee. t ..1 A4 PAM 03 i I I i � I . !3 . tI I I I f I``I ! 1 I i 1 I II J I 1 "98.46683 Order EXP -0006- 00035855 Description 1 j 1 y � Pepe 2 of fO 814z" Itee. t ..1 A4 PAM 03 i I I i � I . 04/23/1999 12:09 619231 '7 FIRST AMERIC," T 931 Grantee dmu It necesaery. Said right shall twt relieve Grareror of be duty m owns tc mm oe remove trop and brush to prevent danger or hazard to property or persons. CONDUCFS CARRY HIGH VOLTAGE SLECTRICAL CONDUCTORS, AND PIPEL24ES MAY CARRY VOLATILE MATERIALS, thertfbm C>»ntor shall not make or allow any excavation or fill to be made within this essemen WITHOUT FIRST NOTIFYING ;SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY BY CALLING 696 -2000, and OBTACNING p. PERMISSION. This ememest shill be binding upon and mum to the benefit of alooaaors, heh—, exemnors, xhnsieaatora, perminw. hoenatee. Agana or "ph of Gesmtor end Grantor. � IN WRNESS WHEREOF, Gtnnmr exomacd this insmunent this 9 day of P.H. III PROPERTIES LLC, a California Limited liability Company HY .�� Paul Eo r 111, tWw anaginQ Pauur e4 RE t CARLTAS COMPANY. a GdCanla Limited Petmmhip 8y: CARLTAS MANAOEMENf, a California corporation/ general pVtna By: _ atop . Cslkinal Prcafdest f � Page 3 of 10 $14m" KW. I WA 04 i' f � I I I i I � I i; �f 11�i Page 3 of 10 $14m" KW. I WA 04 i' f � I I I i I � I ' 1Z 3/1999 12:09 61923' '7 FIRST AMERICAN D ENCINITAS RANCH GOLF AUTHORITY, 2 Joint Exercise of Power Agency Duly Organized and Exisdiag Under the Laws of the Stele of California ji;r BY Ilk Jr I Et Title; NORTH MESA LLC, a California Limited Liability Company Mamepin Member R.E.L., LNIC, a C41ifbmit oo"ration. By: ROI Echterl President IV i1 a w 01 E7CP-0006-00035855 Description: 98,46663 Page 4 of 10 Comment.• PAGE 05 8 AA21/1999 Br k ffd7r- c7m rd N 9 By-. DLAYE A S FIRST AMERICAN ' n OPEN SPACE HOLDING LLC.0 California Limited Liability C=pmy By: CARLTkS COMPANY, a California Limited PammItip/ Member - corpontioW Dr. CARLTAS MANAGEMP NT, i California C@ R C. CALKIW Prosi4st Checked SkcWb None Date 05-28-97 (mvised 07-30.97) Prgjea Na 06535-010.020 C=m Na 1563010,1493920 FA.P.No. Pnrfi o of B6akj 254, 255 and 237 8142"4 Rrv. I Order. E)(P-0006-00035855 Descripflon. 96.46663 Page 5 of 10 commen• I I t PAW 06 I ' L8 3`Yo'd i - Juawwoo 06109 A6P6 £9991'96:uogduosoo ;995E040-9000 -dxs JQWO 1 � I tl1 r �! I i I I I ' i i �l 1'� laaumpsin 2T pmnoya VQM (2)ma •,, 45.14- P,lrtrQ Q oodn 4n- OW SO YA)L --d •21D �IIDG n4M. OIli — �A�'i3Ri US!Sp wp/S1[1M1�f11 ^Y �! ��^t /'d.''19d@J p2'N�I{{i191,0gy/7g�a�y �4j OVR9 il{t POJ[I�fki .�iQ:�:yry may, iUi' C4 ROSPIMOMM P!a 3uatm =u! UMyA e44 of MI"Rm oath ->)oOmm aoyrn Goyuocud a41 oq m MOP" AJOInMM $0 SM Im 01 0 R 6psuostod -- ' 0. I SCY N'Ii 5 P '(a0y}o }a 2o0'OmYa I � 9 !7k m aNA L 661 b a0 II s ' q cTgTao Ajxno0 do UVIS tee I I' - j i G NvDlb3fJ 1SNIA L. .EZGT9 1'.I 60:ZT 666T /£Z /b0 04,23/1999 12:09 YF; 61923' 7 FIRST AMMICAM " .' STATBOF �AUFi 'rR ] COUNTY OF & +Latt , ] -- i 6ef« me�lzQGAi %>L Pflot -PS - rJO� (a�n�e, tit1� a4offioR� �cneetd � L rim -L Order. EXP- 0006.00035955 Description: 96.46663 Pegg 7 of 10 comment F'Af� 08 I ly, �i i i I I � I i i II 04/23/1999 12:09 619232' '7 FIRST NWERICAN � ") STATE OF Oill COUNTY OF --Ah Qir.W rr u fb" 1=1N nwuq, title of officer), _—Y-petumidly kDowu to we ___jwoyod to me cm the bWs of wtisfietory evidcow Im be the pmwnW whone m mw Pm 3ubsmlxd to the widiln i= m= ®a =knowled* lo w that 4Wslia4hrt-mmsed the mmo in hWherl6sir mdhofizod capuciM4*6l and tw by on tto :nstameet the pc:o A. or the cnifty Lrptm behalf of wNch the • I i i i 6iBtntate ®wa.o.eaw�i.7® 1 I; I ll`li �� gxvmcd dw L�� if Order EXP-0006-00035855 Description: 98.46663 Page 8 of 10 coffff"nt I. II iY 1. I. II iY I 04/23/1999 12:09 619231 7 FIRST AMERICAN 937 STATE OF—,I Fo tt fv t � 1 CDUNTYOF lab P t3k� 1s 199 me (war, dtic of Offiolvr), 4 —ZononnlIy 'mom to me to be the pees mo whow np=Vqw-Wb to W � -M= V=-,UaA and -kng-Wgcd to same m,4AW�aOhcK=d capscity(tei), and dui by me eviod k.Ahw ojpm..* M d, Mwuu=l or the Crhty upon behalf of -Web the pcMu(ewbed, excel the kjM=vnL WITNESS my handI it I �If S O]LA y. 10 t -0006-00035855 Descdotion: 98.46663 Page 9 01 10 Comment., J1 p' I PAM 10 If 04/23/1999 12:09 61923' '7 FIRST AMERICAN '7 938 . q oe_. COUNTY t- Sari Off =L 1 }�', !'oo�CcEn6fR 2j�befacejte EtJ R� oama, title of o oat, {p,d 7. F. o :? �xtwoelly knovm to me proved to to on the basil of u ddutm 7 Mdcn" rl f j m be tho pertoMl) you nmai(l) W#6 subs=i d to the within inm eat ad ukaowlod8ed i I S tP ma jut heo,,,i " aecutod tLe same in hisAuT then• n6ortud eapecAY({aa), tmd that hY �itedfikseen ;. i mVmuae(* on the instr=ent the pets *n or the antitY Upon bebW of which the ��— •'--'- +,ppydn(a)'S�•trd esarsmed ehs inafrumaAt. winless my Lend ed IefAeal see. = PATRICtAOtiEW W Qmm bP �o� tietutan w.=60, Juw2l, 2901 Page 10 of 10 Comment: 1 PACE 1 �! �i Order! DT- w Page 10 of 10 Comment: I I I � 1 PACE 1 �! �i I I I � 1 I I I � : � aEl9anNO ef0uE51E0 er . 4N0 NNHI RECOMMED IELDN.L AILS DEED AND. ENLESS ("� y `� I O / OINElM15E STONY IFIOW, Wul AAA 3141E1IFa11510: !S +i H..(v_�1",R:HJ:i 1 ' inn i{ll lu,yp7t {•IJ. rl CARLTAS COMPANY 1998 A9R t$ pH 3.37 RF Pus 4401 MANCHESTER AVE. p8B EPR �� f� ' J'f AR I Part SIIZTD 206 7 A ENCINITAS, CA 92024 Cy*E,` L I OF _r L J ircL� - TIN Old&: n.. ''', .._ $FACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE AR GRANT DEED 0compnwmtugUlu$at or Wmertemy corlNyeO. or ❑ computed on lull value 1683 %AS ad tumuc Maneee remalning al dale M Sala. Y pw,W Y teal WY�g AY Ely YY FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION• reaW of ankh 15 acknavhdpd, I(WeL CARLTAS COMPANY A CALIPCRRIA LIMITED PARTRERSHIP grant to PAUL ECRE, SR., TRUSTEE OF THE PAUL ECkE SR TRUST _ aU that real ENCINITAS .ln+nll property situated In the Cdrtl Or In an unincorporated area ol) SAN DIEGO Cowry, c4lorria ....Yl descntad as kpows Ilnsan Legal descrrytal): AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND UTILITY LINES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS A 40.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND LOCATED IN THE EAST OUAATER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAID EASEMENT MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS THE WESTERLY 40.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 631.16 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE WEST 40.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3. on n a IF- m n vi H I Z AArn! Y/ O .n O G 2 J� 1 m I rI I m M I I♦ v •I h +• ASSOSSar'c prctl 40. ' Carltas Conpany, a Oalifa is ExmndDn , 19A.at Limited Partnership 514LE of CAldOlem Y• as u] Ecke, Jr., rat Partner MIYrYM San Diego STATE Of CALIF Na Ia COUNTY Of _" nDiegp on -q April . 6. I•SBB _. .W.,.y, Inau -lend. 14.1" laa ineMb -_ — Said Sala wlem•M soamand Paul ;?P -ke, Jr. .evwn m ey ter l.owd may OYYtlY4 Ifttm gto Y IM veen M., .a.o,l.d ey Vl,i, MIlN1xnW Y a m ceneNN...Carltu Caipny, a California ��VIAL r Partnership. NenL�L8dlnon ry _Ltd,_. •Inearoy yore Inr Yen wad and arLy.,ledeed tome Inel lM (uMeltlW loran racalww lepaa{w al ell eetmtaYN al o.sculee K Its U 4a A UN �, YAr NE55 mr Wane ertlodluel Yal ('e0eelYell D/ � SIDnNNre._ rrnf!41� N/�' /rtr,Y Irn4.,Y 1w w11u.IroWNlad1 YL..�»� .. w. rwl...r•v .Yrr Y. Yr,N ®Mfeamnl aC on n a IF- m n vi H I Z AArn! Y/ O .n O G 2 J� 1 m I rI I m M I I♦ v •I h +• � ^ I OLIVERHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FILE I PAM NO --------- BOOK 1981 TITLE TRUST CO. District OF-MIAL RECORDS STREET ADORM 1966 ofivenhain Road SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIF. .7 VERA L. LYLE clr� Encinitas RECORDER ST,111 California r., /0 91/6-0 Nor OOC�NT�111 TRMSIER No FrA 254-201- 5 � PAUL LCx[ and w^6DAL[wA ECvE,hnsWawd and wife `. \` __~,_~.,_^',,,--..~..--..~.-.....,�~.~~,-~~~'''~^^^°,'^'~~^�^°~~'''-'`''~^~-°~ ' -..-_,-...---~~.--~'~~-^..~~,^,'~~..,~-^,~^..~,,,~^~..~~~^~..,.~-~~~~~-.~° l _ ^,���°^*- ~~_^.�~~.---' ..................... .°°~.,�.,~...`^^^~_~,,~-^~ ........ ....... ~ ... ... ~......... ^omNrEK,. it- it. rw/"~*««... ribeil "°"w°,^x^ light ei'lw~19Aq....... u~M"uy re. ",° ever. "a, .it ==^"o`/,.d"... ra.bru.m ..^mu ".r. � =°*',il. red else ^v/'.//".p"/,v,/'",.f, ey =o ill "°vww�u*.a^' with """leoa"re"told *a^^/^". � e*~°/i=*a°.^*.//e^ v1,l°` ^v°,=vi,^/.v" ,/.w^u".ltirril°=it^1°*u^.."*"� /,",".,, it ""a, the eight ^/°^,+","*d b/^""" GRANTEE °a"v~",^,,^" hill */"rR~^/» it. tell. rl.,e~^,^ °.thr°,..' -u/."°"' (ilw,`a*"/* dirt right ^/mw,w d ,r"..*=*""",^*wit b,^"°"//`"/ °"te it, ",over, w=w..m./.^acl""e^tledb,/"°. Weather with the right *°wdi/"^w~~el/., Ne".6 W GRANTEE" ,vm^m wry ,"..hi^."w=,"''til.rith=t°",°od^."^/^"*,er.~.""e"ie"*- r*/=d^=m',_",*i"°"".==.~^.m.'"«in*"C^=/,^/��0���@--..w"uyca.um/o, it."*^n 1. -lit SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACIIED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF the gil aza . ON THIS wnca�ncc IT OF � � � - | ` ' � ' ' i-.^^� 1J, , EX7�AIS,OAI NO. 72 14 CO. PLAT easements YM� of 0liveohxi"wwn�*�;m�w \�/ � xcso/ °/° v Prepared by: " '' /.�,'.4 ---- ; .",",nora,/on - | ` ' � ' ' i-.^^� 1J, �e i r L 2 Reid ... .moot of richt of is" In the dcnsMA Imde 1. Oonie.lvly deerllrJ .• fellnvx The Southerly 20.00 feet of the above described property, GRANTOR, It. heln..uccumnr., .nd u•.I{n., .h.li enl eon or eon.wcl nr gnsil W im sncled m enn.t uc lu• o . - -- h,uldin[, .wctun n imPmrenenl on, .r 1 or u+d.f my Podion or W. e. ....el, ou, wlull CRANTOR. iu heiu, x c n r uutpu. pht ey w• or Irce. a Plsnl Uny olAer yr -ldim or nen, nor di[ n dr.1l An, he:s Pr Amos m uny poet.. of the ...em.nL GRANTEE mq. In its sole diecntlon, eon, ..sirloin, or AmI VIe& in all f.n'.. which nor ems.., Inlet cm•s ..y win. of N..sm..AL GRANTEE shell oI.. b entitled to W m, eut. nr Iles, urn, eny eons, bru.h, nr other ,....Lilco n [I. o no fm ti to U. a GRANTEE detenninn• 1s it- sois dieenUOn rithout An' vldil bnel eompc..."On. GRANTEE .h sit b sAuo d W pndtllon, ..dry. Joint ...W., or shore All or ms' M`dion .f Wis...emenl rich oW.ther 'Ute sgsnq or ..hilly ieelodinp but not limited W, my al .uPPlyln[ w.br or serer •ervics. or f�cililie• W the pIAUc .. GRANTEE nmY detemi.. in Its sole di.emllon wiNout p"o, .ny additbnd eempen.slbn W GRANTOR or GRANTOR'• hells, .ueeae.oAs. tt ... l ms. W.n Jan GRANTOR e[ree IAei n eth.r ...emenl oe .nom en4 .boll bo meted A. under a over his maemonl rilh ..l oldeinb[ - 1he On., mitten eo.senl of GRANTEE. GRANTEE may sl soy Uw leer,... It. us. of th. ee.men6 eh.nr. We Ioc.Uon or pipelines u other fellitt.. wilAlle lhs bmdlW.. e! We e..emenl d[ht of ..y. ne ..edify W..iae of eabtin[ 01"n" of'u"' ir.pmnueeY se it." deer miss in its sole diseestieo hood GRANTEE doe. Gel sap y uIe of Ns uoment beyo A tA�R: ORANTOd.nelds• e<..NOn, er edle., pmr . scribed above. It 1. A. md.n.tOOd sod sv.ed by the psnle. lhel th. GRANTOR and W. CR,kNTOIYe heir', enccw ... re or vu{n., .... not Inr, ee I., .' lot timwW a doe.. ..l 1. edXecumd .d Rout ebte w.tiAl t{ IMrprior vnit4a cm eat of the l R TEE. uemel nbcb va In We .vent of my di'pur iarolvW{ Wks A{naeeL whaher er sot liuplinn 1. enmenneed, m if mY srhiwtioe Pro• c.sdin {..dmi. -Inst v. Pmes.dln[ or lilit.uoo W 1 or In'.ity. inclu'in[ m rcti.A for deelan.ry nNer, to Isorl[hl to solo... er in4ryrtl Us. Pmriei... Pr PAKO'snce of Wi. ....... C. tb. pnvelli ,Y vadY shsi ,6o nli,IM to Fm a`rd of e11 atbm.r n feu .M IA. ww.I. ^f rF...•.....a �.. —A ;" .e..' STATE OF CALIFOR \IA COU \TT OF [`w nTPGO JA.hnJARY 30 1981 __. 1•.mn mr. w Iht edrrd,nrd, s N-1-1 PAAIic in .Ad let 44 cooml'Ad uw. 1r.wn.11l .mil led PAUL Ef�SR�,1A� -__ knu.e m e'e Is Iw the Im.— rhve •olrriLed to IN, ri•hio imtrvemnl. As III, Ansnel_ in fm. d ..d set'QGD•J a IA. he aWri4J the n el _ NAGDALFN t ECRE .� priediml_ e' — orn name— sa Mmm.Y— In feet. 7� Sit =tl- 3 x, fume IT.fvd a Pnmrdl s Nouo PALL. in ed for Nd CAA-'T .n.l Rlste FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP -r OFFICIAL SEnt j BARBARA LOWER _;y Norap PuMk kz In 5 N i it - ♦i�'Y pYUkIPPI ONM In ' DIEGO COUNT .. h .Me comnImio, No. Aeurl 2 1%1 'f :7F'• 7.' t ` J 411'1E .A S£MENT t Project: EX F_NSION P /O. 72 i PLAT of easements required., CD Olivenhain Municipal llatk IPrepared by: Boyle Englneerin9 Corporation .P . x•.�c- .:.a!!fric:Ef.�"�,.GE %, --400' ..... Tax Par. ! P54- PO / -o5 lase Map 1 1 V2 OM G C. A. N. C•001- 225.01 , f� O' R/N 1 1029759 —� vC rfl, Date: JULY 22,!980 1 'r JC': `tu}. +.•L �-. :'r. •ii+ yi= .1s'^�:P: a:'":. s ^eX:..- j 1 ^R 1 5� 12 t Said —.1-Mat of light of may in the r...id lends In P „rtie.lady doecnlwd et LJlnwa: - The Southerly 20.00 feet of the above described property. 4 GRANTOR, n. helm, .uceeseon. and sa•i[ee, shell not enact or caupuct of pewit to b. . ,Meted er com"clad, may buildme, alrvctun m inipmvenanL en, ever of usdar anY p.nion of the nnn•wanl, nor rhea GRAATO& Ile hero, ..ccr•won, u.igna, me roe Items or plant any other v.m•mtim m nnn, oar Jip m Arill anY hole or melts m any pmt roe v! plant any 'he e••e,aenl. GRANTEE may, i Ito male dl.cmlion, enact, w.inhln, m .0 ante. In ell tome. which... Enos. m later c ,M.. an: Amnion of the ....Meat. GR&%rTEE •hall oleo be enllt ed W trio, cal. or deer .way any Im .. Wu.h, m other .epee •Iron 0 nee- !non lion. W tin. a GRANTEE drmauinu to it. Mr. discretion with--t any ulditmnnl mmmtwn"i me. 1 GRANTEE small be arud d W Penitlm, a +Ip, joint ven•ena, or .hum ell me any Pnninn of thi. easement riih any other public ganey .r uLiIlty i.cl.d.l. hot not Umlud W. any .Leary supplying water or armor services or facilities W the public as GRANTEE w Y determine in its sole dlacntim withuul paying MAY oddith"81 e+•mrtmmalloe W GRANTOR or GRANTOR'. be:n, .accu wra m uelgaa, thenror. GRMT01t rtmea lh.L no other .ucwcal or er sweats .hell be panted on, and,,, ar aver lhi. co..aent withaul obtaining the prior wri U.n c... eat cf GRANTEE. GRANTEE way at say time in ere... its n.. of the s.aeneeL. chants the Ime.U.. of pipeline- m other facilities within the Eoundruie. of th . ...... nl right of way, me modify Me .Iw of sai.timg pipelinem or other iMpavemonu as it may dater - miss in its sot. doer ion Don Ilwa W time —rim"t P• 'b•' any ad6t,00.I campensnbon , GRRITO GRANTOR'. hairs. uce.lama, or u.ipn, pevid.d GRANTEE does not --Paced its u.. or u,. ..... cot beyond ] . a ... meal hemnderio de• rcnbed above. It i. J.. ode.- +load and aimed by the panlee tlmt the GRANTOR and lh. GRANTOR'. h. in, u......n, or .urns, .hell hat Inc.... or deems. or transit W be iaae... d .r dacm ... d the .ueling L.ad elevations of the aWn�e.eriL.d ....m.. l which .a6W at the Lieu We dimcuweN is o'c'tal withovl ebtsieinm the prior wfitbn ronaeol of the GRANTEF_ wh.lher a not litigation 1. caMmenced, or if any .r Lotion pm- t. the event of anY csodin /evolving this Agnnmenl, r eed'm E• .dmin.trpiv. pmcsading or Iili plim {u law or in equity, Inellding an xetinn far declenbry nlfeG I. Gouplll W W e vdNng Pnny .hall be "tilled W me •wnu of ell enforce a mYrprt the provi lion. or grfonsance of Nis .oewml, pm •a -� ,,. cYVa•v. fue aM llu anal• N 6. •••e•- -A:•. - •Xb..r•.0 a' +_•_�._a a.. n. . -.r_ —. ._. S1wTE OF GLIFOFJIIA mew or SAN DIEGO ON. lANOARY 30 le 81 klwe me, the rgMersigrc4 g Notary Pr6F[ m amJ Ion Baia State, Rrsangal' eppnnrM — _ PAUL tmo to M. to be llr WSUr —wihm rma— Ss �Aluibrd to the within hrstrimni. and IWAsi•dged to ” thin —hc— executed tie same. WITNESS e-q hand and oRrcal Leg/ - XemrtNOlc :eW dr Vii Rata. -Priwec6w'EXFENS /ON N0. f PLAT r^ of easements requiral 01 ivenhain Municipal Wal Prepared by: Bode Enqineering Corporation 1 I ass's._ - sass._ - -� ..._:. -_ _. _... -.: p•a.: _.' -t h a ..•400 1 , Tax Par. I 154- 201 -05 BSseg Map V - .:1.... ,. fp tTa Vl�•y, C. A.N. 0•001- 225.01 R/W / 1029753 Date: I ULY 22.1980 t i OFFICIAL SEAL •tv- 41 2 My Com icken BARBARA 1. Col Nor." s� plblk ic - • CdR. p'ik.cal Offiu In SAN DIEGO COUNrY E.ptm Aueva It 1-0 WITNESS e-q hand and oRrcal Leg/ - XemrtNOlc :eW dr Vii Rata. -Priwec6w'EXFENS /ON N0. f PLAT r^ of easements requiral 01 ivenhain Municipal Wal Prepared by: Bode Enqineering Corporation 1 I ass's._ - sass._ - -� ..._:. -_ _. _... -.: p•a.: _.' -t h a ..•400 1 , Tax Par. I 154- 201 -05 BSseg Map V - .:1.... ,. fp tTa Vl�•y, C. A.N. 0•001- 225.01 R/W / 1029753 Date: I ULY 22.1980 t i - SCd uermmt of rich, of .eY in the afornenld Lends ix 1, ti.ulady dexcn4,d •• rvllowx. The Southerly 20.00 feet of the above described property. GRANTOR, it. hnin, ste. ,eo, and •miry•, shall ool es C, or mus"d or remit m be meted or eonnwc0.•w, .nY building, .wcWn or ispe, ,•enl oa. .,or or order m1 Pont- n tire e'im" or dip n'holl my INTUI sit- fi ro apt P^'lmo of n snags•. PI•nl ant L'. ne trees or plant my the ...lo ..- GRANTEE may. in its vole dirnlim, encl, maintain, or ear [rile• in all fannes which .o. Cri or Inter crux. my Pmtim of the meni GRANTEE eh.11 oleo her mtlllod w kne, cut. or clear uwxy any tree., tarrnh. or other rrRai Nion or non fms time to lime v. GRANTEE deiced.. is its .da diserelion without any mhlilionnl compenaalton. CRAN'rEE •hall he retitled W partition, sulry, IDlnl venture, or alms dl or nay Pnnina or NI• ae.cromt with or, cihcr Dshllc .VoCY or utility including, but not "mile .. ro, my agency supplying water or .ewer ti.. cua or facilities TO f N the public u GRANTEE say datemine In it. mIn di.esllon w d.out Drying rosy additional comimin.tian to GRANTOR or GRANTOR'S hair., .v.erws, or edges, ther.far. GRANTOR •[nee hat me otimr naii or euemena .hall b pentad en, under, or oror this ....wept without ohmining IM pnnr wnitan consent or Gfi.&NTEE. GRANTEE m.y at my Grua l....re It. eau of `h creme., .hmgn pi locntim of other or other far alines l iNln the bnundenes of Na a ml right o. ray. or modify the .iae of sabtln[ Pipeline. er oNer impsvemanh no it mxy halm- .... in its ... dmcnti" Mn fl. to time without paying my .ddiliosul eonpenrxuon to GRANTOR or GRANTOR' • heir, •ucce MOs, of a.dme. coxidord GRANTEE dos• not upend its r. of Na remain t beYomi the eea.sml houndorie. •b- reribee shorn. it I. also undenlmd sad agvad by the parti.. that the CHINTGR "it the GRANTOR's h.is, ii -l"on, or ""no' .hall col Increase or decsr. or Persil W be iner .... d or deemed No ecisling [round elevations of Ne sbuvs- dex.ribed eel which esi.w rot uns tim. We doeumxnt is executed without obtaining the Pnor ..ttC. con.ent of the GRANTEE. a.w le Ne srwm of my di.puu ieralrmg Nla AgnasmI. wE•ther or not litigation is conmencrd. of if my arbitration li ..din[. sdmin.tnlir. Dr > :eedin[ or IiGPti" Ix law or in "City. including an retain for deel.ranry .lief, n Moughl to enforce or m4rpnt M prurid". or or'•ommn of this aremrnl. the pnrsiling I'my car, be mlinad le m sward of dl snneuY'. feu and N. coots of Ne Meseding. s's,ch .ball b delersured b Ne noun a abe Pe •kin[ officer hoeing . lhonly b matt 011 denAinativa. 1 GRANTOR eapnasly .artmY and spn•s^t• N.l GRANTOR he. the power lea arms g►i. suemeel in /aceuN.eee sigh i it. Ism.. t clot O(n'J 1 lb. GRANTOR has executed this Euasonl lhu.. X" An llimrgs lDlYrtol, -- -� -� - -� e a i a'. 1 E..eated is the rinse.. of., ........... _....._ ............ �iiftwg.......... R/W No. 1029753 DRAWN By CHECKED 8Y —� ACCT. NO. C -001- 225 -01 DATE July 22. 1980 /mb Milner. 1./NL GA 5_ °.M ENT Tax Par. 1 254- 20/ -03 Base Map Project: EVVIVIS /ON NO. ............... ..... ............................... DdxW. rite h A-1 f�oss Zr ' ..... wino PLAT c of easements requird I. olivenlwin Municipal Wai1d1 Prepared by: Boyle Engineering Corporation s, C.A.H. c•00/• 225 -01 R /il J 1029753 ` Date: JULY 22,/960 ;a l v- fix``« :; F�r! I h'. 'l i 1 EXHIBIT "A" The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 13 South, Range 4 West, STn Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Official Plat thereof. EXCEPTING- therefrom that portion lying Westerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 3; thence South 89 °59'424 East 127.65 feet; thence South 0 °47'28" West, 419.54 feet to a point on the arc of a tangent 20 foot radius curve concave Northeasterly; thence Southeasterly along the are of said curve through a central angle of 90 000'00" for an arc distance of 31.42 feet; thence South 89 012'35" East G4.91 feet to a point on the arc of a tangent 530.00 foot radius curve, concave Southwesterly; thence easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 16 000100" for a distance of 166.50 feet; thence South 71 °12135" East, 33,00 feet to a point or the arc of a 470.00 foot radius curve, concave southwesterly; thence Easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angie of 92 °30100% for an arc distance of 756.78 feet; thence North 16 011'25" East, 314.78 feet to a point on the arc of a 530.00 foot radius curve concave Southeasterly; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 37 010'100, for an arc distance of 343.83 feet to the TRUE POINT Of BEGINNING of the herein described line; thence South 7931'06" East, 1,900,00 feet, more or less, to the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter. � slki&WINY W M aaWdA 00k4dl ft arr►t•POW w,p,em w&w VmmA," rq. b bads X6014 •tree ra,erAu nM0 eaaM M aebY Im eaeMb rid✓ W ow" w46144e 1601 IN na 90 ereY 60002 b weYn b� r/ b nbA•a1 R/W No. 1029753 PLAT of easement: required by the Olivenhain Municipal Water District Prepared by: Boyle Engineering Corporation C.A.N. C-001-295-01 R/W / 7029753 Date: JULY 22,1980 i K a -r i i� i •r - "' -LINO �A6CM6N7• 1••400 GET68 �.'1 -- :- ;�:.,,;;:: __ ,.: -,. ° .-`------ .._,�-- .�- �•- ::.....+•r,,. ' Jar. ! 754 -2 ,.. Project . EXrEN5/0N NjO. 72 a '8 Ma --- - -- ° p 1 PLAT of easement: required by the Olivenhain Municipal Water District Prepared by: Boyle Engineering Corporation C.A.N. C-001-295-01 R/W / 7029753 Date: JULY 22,1980 i K a -r i i� i .� 4 F... :�„ .. .. .. �.. .. r.. w.... k •i�, _ tr•J SEG S4 SEC. 9S T, l2 S, R. f. W. 4 {Y: a^ f , i SI✓lNC N£�4 S2CT /ON 9 T. is 4,r. iN. _ \M4A Sq///e } OETA /L 5 d F N08CALf N i PO /NT 1 �I 9!? Y . N.WD. • /t 7G 70 I ®.- /NaICATQS WATER rss.e� 0£168 G/.Vf dA SLM£NT �', �S w n w b .z ! �• f00� i �- - - - - -- rat -P5r•: r- iss- ro / -os ect: EXTENSION NO. 72 } OETA /L d FOX - �� N08CALf N PO /NT MAP 9!? I ®.- /NaICATQS WATER 0£168 G/.Vf dA SLM£NT �', �S � .z ! �• f00� i �- - - - - -- rat -P5r•: r- iss- ro / -os ect: EXTENSION NO. 72 ease Map / 1 PLAT of easewnts required by the 01ivenhain Municipal Mater District CAM C Ml- R/M / /02975JF pared by: Date: le EngineericgCorporation } 886 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: OLIYENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Mao WEN A E m.OM MAIL TO: � � Olivenhain Municipal Water sTR"T Dl strl ct Auollcs 1966 Olivenhain Road ITATE Encinitas za Cal ifornta TubatiwH.. /09'8P75-09 T. P.m.d Nn, 2Sa,9n] -M Es�l. Tom- 7300/ 0- Bi- 663248 FN.EIPAGE M0. _,_____ EK 1981 RECORDED INW REQUEST T TITLE INSURANCE 6 TRUST 0 MAR 3 8:00 AMi OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIF. VERA L LYLE RECORDER ni. ,p.0. fa It.wN..•..„N0 FEE NO tgCLKNTARY TRANS ER TM CARLTAS COMPANY, INC., a California Corporation ia Ction ND PEE fkm immfMr "GRANTOR") hwNy R.,, 1. l......_.. OLU( ElQfA1N. NIJNICIPAL1iATE $.AISTRILT.A.sw0.11t._... .... ..................... . on......._.................. . ... . ........... .............................. t6ommta.,'(IRANTW'1, N. raw..r., or .Rill., 11., bllwln. &.eib.d,000 r row. d.bl.f w ..XXXXXX)= (KNX91XiWIWK W. "Nn...,", ..de, old .rao.. W Id. do, wd bl... r ...,d, eoo O ...a...lr.o6 nplw., npLLA .n.inWn, .nil u... Owl.. Or plmll... fw w .W .II pure..., balAr .ill .0 a,.m..w bul Rol Iimil.d W, furfllhoo br po.,r Imn,miwl.m and cooman1..Rm p.rp..,a, .t ..ch loo.RW...d al...11.n,, .pm, ol"X w.r and on" a. rldbl or .y d..nlbd blow u GRANTEE ..y row m bro.R.r d.t.,NIO. W it. l.1. diwnllon ..thou, my n.ldll l,r.l ro.p.e,Ybn Un.r.fw, "otior.iib a. a& of J.".. ood .0... f t o «.I.r.l by . VN I..l rouu. or mu W. to, .pm, o..r, or .w... am lood do. b.d Woo. ball., .ilh Ib. dpi b ow air. «owt far.e,r.M to ORANIMC. npht. or ..y .1W.I.d,M 0j—..l l..da, .lu of 1«r .W,wo.1 w.rs,..ti a.mlor. 'fito land n.n,Popr.In, Ihl..,.«..m I..1W*bd 10 the tb..tr.f ..SaQ_QtepC...._., stow orCYintitic n,d 1. mom The Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 13 South. Range 4 Nest, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Official Plat thereof. EXCEPTING that portion described as follows: c Coartencing at the Southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast :. Quarter; thence along the Southerly line thereof, North 89 °11'20" West 177.34 ` feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said Southerly line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, North 89°11'20` rrk West 253.81 feet; thence North 0048'40" East 457.00 feet; thence South 89'11'20" East 253,81 feet; thence South 0 °48'40" West 457.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, C NO CHARGP, ON THIS r)OCUMrNT �r FOR THE BENEFIT OF 4L �A,✓ Ta7.i h�iAl N `R ^ ME Seid emeewit of right or my, In the of..kd Irk, . Prlle.luly b,orllyd se fWloim: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF ORANTOIC Me be tro, "'rem- ad s,lgne, ,bfili me error r rer-ogot a p.mll te or oag.l.d or omewr.rd. any, hlldinl. "'ook ag or Irpvpr,ronl on, erer or Wee rty Porttoe or the •..oral ner -MII GRANTOR. Igo Min, fiocm,se.. at ueian., Plat W Pes at trs, w Pterd my othr asMtlm r Ilan, her dig or drill my hole or write m e"Y Portiari or tb s.ermel. ORANTER w. to itAi eoM dl.oagllm, ,rat, rel.l.le, or .a atee In fill loner. rhi,h .e. cage. or like,. .. WiY portbn of 6e eeersel. Ori N d,fl Ns v .elided to Wo, al, or el.w. -ay any tree.. Mefih, or.tber mgtd.Rpe or nea M W, to Nrm u ORANTIM delredm. d Re ral, dbollan ellheel any .JAllirml Wrpm.Nbe. ORAMIK -h.11 be erNRN b Prlllb4 .e•ige, Ialnt .,mane or ,ten JI w my tro is of thi. ugemem Nth my arm, wblle fige.q -r mil Ny I.uleelles, M eol II.R.d W. my .gory oPPI11 -9 -.tier or seer nmlwn or Feellitir. W the pebll. as GRANTEE Way, diiiamis IN IM ale dleer.tlea .dlhoal Pat., e.y ,ddRim.l earpew.db. to ORAWMR or ,,AMR14 help, "..am. or reign,. IhenPer. ORANTUR sroar that no other ..germnl or eueo.ntr .hell be granted m, ceder, or me, thb ..•.noel Ntle," ahaglnl.g the Prior w1111." em.mt of ORANTKR. ORANTiCB rq .t any time /.arose he u, of the ..mast, olrmp tike ].Milan of p1poll.m v other fmll llbfi 9161" the beand•ri.s at the emork nl rLAW of eery, M edify IM .Ind ..hung plpelw. or other IrpagresaM s it sl1 dder- mm• hi R. ,ob deed. Rom firm W Ilrm .Itmet wls my .d011osl wasoslloe to utmti"In w ORAM'ow. het., .sesMaag, w e.,la., provd.d ORANTRR dos Mel ..Frei Ile ... of 6e "uor wl Myehd the fiwwl beludutls d.- ..Abed .hare. It to ,lea oeder.lwd and .gaged by IM Prlte, 6• the GRANTOR aced the GJMN R'e helag, •"aa•.rnn, or M.Wir ., •hall ant It..s w it... or I m, b la Mreesd w dmmred the ,elklef gr..rk rl...,liafi of the fibre- d"mlbed rsfirat Wt. erle4 M the Ima 61. dec,rm le ,..caked .16n1 kilal.dg the prier ar11M. awmW of the ORANTf.R. In 6..v.nt of my dlapote I.rolrleg &I. Agag.ral. -bather or al lltlntme he mo.hmd, or If W, rbNealb. Pt euding, ,dere,t.l"it Pagw.de" or Itugaura 4 Ifie or Ice Me". Inebdle. m were. for deelmiery Mier. ie bagmbl W .rigors or iwarPagt Q. P..Sol. x 'ROt . of mi. enaeral, We "'.It I., arty Well M angled I. u ..rod of ell .Aerie... tan. and Im e..l. N the wee.rdbfi. chid .ball M dotewb,.d 1. 6..." .,,k. pr•eddg elfiee, baring 9o- 6mRy W robe thl. drt.ml.otlm. OIIANTOR elmn.•IY .•naM ad agProeee, the OKAJIWR hie. u,,, Paws to .nn1 till. ou."a in ...do. -16 Igo bm.. Jill 1DIIRng wiNttol, the 0RAHtt1R be. ameateid tht. Roemeet th RoserMd b We Peo.ae. at. .......... ............................... w"r6,a. gip �, 1029754 1 DRAr11 BY CHECHED DY _ A", NO.. r_nnd_9YK_n7 DATE August 15, 1980 /Inb U. la Fr O a O C JZ i r r� r 1 STATE: OP CAUFOICNI, QII']Tl OF f _ _ cs_ v _ •y.& j ru.ri 1`W.Ye in L for ..M f"a.nry _ rw....I. ., ...r.a _- _ PAUL gam_ ' PAUL N 4n rb _ PrrlJrnl. .nd� ecxel Tx. ,.. Viee Pr�cidgii.riig r,r.rwr.ri. r6.r '..rd rb .� ^.^�rnn1 rb m, Lr,yff of rlrn .v.rw.liu. r ,A, F i'°�F'4rd M ur IA.r _ V aT� r r+.r m N. rr..vl.rv�d Ir.M 'r6a rad d aaa FOR NOTARY {4L OR ITAMr EM WM. M gm TT 1 EXHIBIT 'A" Parcel 888 .All that portion of the Southerly 20.00 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3 lying Westerly of the Westerly line of land described in Parcel 1 in Deed to San Dieguito Irrigation District and Olivenhain Municipal Water District, filed in,tbe Office of the County Recorder of said San Diego County May 16, 1974 as Document No. 74- 127670 of Official Records. Parcel 2: All that portion of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3 described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the Westerly line of sold land described in Parcel 1 in Deed to San Die Suite Irrigation District and Olivenhain Municipal Water District, and the Northerly line of the Southerly 20.00 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence along said Westerly line, North 0'09'44" West (record North 0 °48040" East) B,69 feet; thence South 67 039'24" West 23.02 feet to said Northerly line of the Southerly 20.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3; thence along said Northerly line, North 89.50'16' East (record South 89 °11'20• East) 21.32 feet to the Point of Beginning, r M O-hM%k UMMO art aaaat a pill✓ N" p mmmw NWA& al rw u •FaaI I laawmaplo GladNa1 wacmepwudb0"*mi w4 oar of Uoawaai mmw4d wal ewa WwAft RN Na. 1029754 r� Z- 2 in m r SEC; 94 SEa 95 Y, r23., R. 4 W. F.4 W. 1 �Ey4 SECT /ON 9 L uS,R. 4f W. I00. TO SAM O aAf.W0. MAY /e, ID7,6 f7f -I It 1670 / SI✓�NH SH�NE ,m rra.er 0,t 2D WATER L /NE CENTER Of EASEMENT v s sec. 0 --- '---- -- - --- -- - -- rrxel' n NO'9 50 /6 E giTSi}fs e.o9' 7Jj71,� u e' j =�+ KdRI aFre�c PDX Na $ure N PO/MT MAP MY 1 ®_lNorcMIES WATER I LINE &A 6EMENT 1', 400' Tax Par, I 26 +•201.0& Project: EXTENSION NO. 72 Base Wp /' J PLAT of easeatents required by the Olivenhain Municipal Water District C.A.N. C•00 /• 225.0/ Prepared by: R/B A 7029784 Boyle Engineering Corporation Date: ✓1ILY L2.19S0 Z- 2 in m r LATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS: 'OUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) TIE I,nitiIA OF THIS DOCUMENT K RECORDED OM JUL 13, 2000 DOC1DfTTT HNER 2000-0369920 GUM J. SKI% CUIIfY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COO RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 1:14 PH 1, Bart J. Hartman, certify that I am the duly qualified and elected Treasurer -Tax Collector of the County of San Diego, State of California; That I have examined the records in my office as to delinquent taxes and assessments collected by the County of San Diego on the property in the subdivision or parcel map known as: CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98-171 A final map of which subdivision or parcel map is about to be filed with the appropriate legislative body in the County of San Diego for approval; and I hereby certify that at the date hereof there are NO liens against said subdivision or parcel map, or any part thereof for unpaid State, County, Municipal or local taxes and special assessments for the fiscal year 1999/2000. I further certify that there are against the parcel or parcels of real property within which the subdivision or parcel map is situated liens for State, County and local taxes and special assessments collected as taxes which are a lien but which are not yet payable and which I estimate as follows: State, County, School and Special District Taxes $41,357.00 Include city of ENCINITAS In WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13TH day of JULY of 2000. Certificate No. 00 -241 THIS CERTIFICATE VOID BEGINNING: SEPTEMBER 20, 2000 Parcel No. 254- 611 -07 -00 254 - 611 -09 -00 254 - 611 -10 -00 BART J.HARTMAN TREASURER COLLECTOR BY: (Depuy) Subject to Government Code Section 66493 Tax SuretyBond Required Yes ® No ❑ This certificate must be filed with the County Recorder and a Conformed copy delivered to the appropriate legislative body in the County of San Diego. Recording Requested by: Leucadia County Water District When Recorded, Mail to District Engineer Leucadia County Water District 1960 La Costa Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 For the benefits of the District I,— �IIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT WAS RECORDED ON JUL 11, 2000 DOCUMENT NUMBER 2000 -03057 GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY fi'ECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 0:00 AM SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDERS USE ONLY GRANT OF NON - EXCLUSIVE SEWER EASEMENT JUL THIS DOCUMENT BEING RECORDED TO CORREC Li DOCUMENT NO. 2000 - 0334336 RECORDED 6126120©Q NEer,l;,i; SERVic e s J 4 f` "ITy`NCINI7A5 Assessor's Parcel 3 / `� Project NORTHMESALOWER No. 254- 61 -07, 10 f W.O. No. 191947 BARRATT AMERICAN, INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORP.. AS OWNER its successors and assigns, ( "GRANTOR ") hereby grants to the LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a governmental entity and its successors and assigns, ( "GRANTEE "), a perpetual nonexclusive easement and right -of -way upon, in, across, over, and under the lands described below, to erect, install, construct, repair, replace, and maintain sewer pipeline(s) and/or mains, manholes, sewer lateral pipelines, and all structures and appurtenances incidental thereto, (hereinafter " pipeline(s) and related facilities "), above and below ground, at such location(s) within the easement as GRANTEE may from time to time determine. Said easement is located in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, and is more particularly described on Exhibits A and B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. GRANTOR shall cause said pipeline(s) and related facilities to be: designed, reviewed, and approved by the LCWD District Engineer and constructed by GRANTOR under a LCWD development agreement with inspection and final acceptance by LCWD. Within a reasonable time following acceptance of installation of said pipeline(s) and related facilities, GRANTOR shall complete LCWD approved surface improvements at GRANTOR's sole expense. Thereafter, GRANTOR shall maintain said surface improvements in good condition at all times and GRANTEE shall maintain said pipeline(s) and related facilities in good condition at all times. GRANTOR grants the right of ingress and egress to GRANTEE to and from said easement by reasonable routes to carry out the purposes of this easement, together with the right to use the easement for GRANTEE's access to adjacent property. GRANTOR reserves to itself, and its successors and assigns, the right of ingress and egress across the easement surface at all times except during construction, repair, or maintenance of the pipeline(s) and related facilities. GRANTOR additionally reserves to itself, and its successors and assigns the right to erect and Non - Exclusive Sewer Easement Page 1 maintain gate(s) within or to the easement as long as GRANTEE is provided with a key at all times to said gate(s), if locked. GRANTOR shall keep the easement graded flat and unobstructed at all times, and shall not plant any landscaping (including trees), or construct any structures or improvements (including paving) within the easement without the prior written consent of GRANTEE. GRANTOR will be responsible for all such landscaping or improvements (including paving) consented to by GRANTEE within the easement and GRANTEE will not be liable for any damage thereto. Notwithstanding any consent granted by GRANTEE, GRANTEE shall have the right, upon reasonable notice, to remove any such landscaping or other improvements, including paving, as necessary for maintenance or repair purposes, or which interfere with GRANTEE's ability to otherwise exercise its rights under this easement, provided that GRANTEE shall repair and/or replace any paving removed or damaged by resurfacing the immediate area as near as practicable to its preexisting condition, all at GRANTOR's sole expense. Further notwithstanding any consent granted, GRANTEE shall have the right, at its sole expense, to permanently trim or permanently remove any landscaping or other improvement within the easement that unreasonably interferes with GRANTEE's ongoing exercise of its easement rights and GRANTOR waives any right to compensation with respect to any such permanent removal. For routine construction, repair, and maintenance of GRANTEE's improvements within the easement, GRANTEE shall provide GRANTOR 48 hours notice in writing or by telephone prior to initiating work. GRANTEE shall not be obligated to provide GRANTOR with notice in the event of an emergency involving GRANTEE's facilities where the emergency precludes, as a practical matter, the giving of prior notice. The easement conveyed by this grant is not exclusive and GRANTOR reserves the right to grant easement rights to others or to dedicate the land subject to the easement to a public agency, provided that GRANTOR shall not have the right to convey rights to any other party to make a use in the easement that interferes with, restricts, or conflicts with the rights granted to GRANTEE hereby. GRANTOR shall notify GRANTEE within a reasonable time prior to the granting of any future easement or use within the easement, and allow GRANTEE the opportunity to review any such grant or use in order that GRANTEE is reasonably assured that its rights herein will not be interfered with or restricted in any way whatsoever. All terms and conditions of this easement shall be binding upon the parties, their successors and assigns. The benefits and burdens herein are intended, and shall, run with the land. In the event of litigation to interpret or enforce the terms and provisions of this easement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees, including engineering fees, and investigative fees, in addition to costs. This easement represents the entire agreement between the parties and shall not be modified except by a written instrument signed by the parties and recorded. Non - Exclusive Sewer Easement Page 2 WIMIN W 10 0o M ®L6 GRANTOR expressly warrants and represents that it has the power to grant this easement in accordance with its terms. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTOR executed this Easement on this 5th day of July 2000 . BARRATT AMERICAN, INCORPORATED, A DELAW AS OWNER: BY: A CORP., BF"CKER, VICE PRESIDENT BY: STEPHE RED), SEMOR VICE PRESIDENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) Latonia M. On July 5, 2000 before me,-West -- (here insert the name and title of the officer), personally appeared G. Jack Becker, Stephen R. Rei4 personally known tome (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that §}%/they executed the same in hY�/i}e<r /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by 1)i6 dir /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNES my hand and official seal. LATONIA M. WEST COMM. #1252915 n U NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA Vl U '� SAN DIEGO COUNTY n My Commission Expires Notary Public, Latonia M. West FEBRUARY 7, 2004 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real roperty conveyed by the Deed or Grant dated 7/S/ D 0 from 13 r. 0-0 -- I" ArteR., ca-i to Leucadia County Water District, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the Board of Directors of Leucadia County Water District on % ) /01 D v (or by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the Board of Direct sro of Leucadia County Water District pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution No. 410 of the Board of Directors of Leucadia County Water District adopted on December 14, 1972), and the Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized offic�e /r DATED: 1 / Io / O 0 / ca, WATER DISTRICT Non - Exclusive Sewer Easement Page 3 m tl]N�I]NgY Em�pmNio.e"sw. m.lrc EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A" THAT PORTION OF LOT 75 OF MAP NO. 13356 IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 4, 1996, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 75; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF, NORTH 89 °13'10" WEST, 36.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY SIDELINE OF THAT EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES GRANTED ON SAID MAP NO. 13356 KNOWN AS QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY SIDELINE, NORTH 00 °17'00" WEST, 172.12 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 29.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 42 °24'06" EAST TO SAID POINT; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY SIDELINE, WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42 041'06 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 21.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 °43'00" WEST, 13.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 21.50 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY 6.45 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17 °11'06 "; THENCE NORTH 73 °05'54" WEST, 4.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 38.50 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY 11.55 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17 °11'06'; THENCE SOUTH 89 °43'00" WEST, 49.90 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 30.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 14.51 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27 015'58" TO THE BEGINNING OF REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 59.50 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 27 032'58 "WEST TO SAID POINT; THENCE WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY, AND NORTHERLY 144.48 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 139 007'56" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 30.50 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 68 °25'02" WEST TO SAID POINT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 14.51 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL PAGE 1 OF 3 :kd M90294\132legal Descnplions�A10 NExd Sort Esmt.doc WO 294- 132 6/26/00 ANGLE OF 27 °15'58'; THENCE NORTH 05 041'00" WEST, 210.17 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 220.50 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 87.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22 037'11" TO THE BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 40.50 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 73 003'49" WEST TO SAID POINT; THENCE EAST AND SOUTHEASTERLY 106.49 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 150 039'18" TO A POINT DESIGNATED HEREIN AS POINT "X "; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 84 °01'41" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 59.40 FEET; THENCE NON - TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 18 °22'50" EAST, 1.15 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 8.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 10.29 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 73 041'52" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.50 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 34 °40'58" WEST TO SAID POINT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 21.56 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 60 016'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 171.50 FEET, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 85 002'40" EAST TO SAID POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY 2.18 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00 043'40'; THENCE SOUTH 05 °41'00" EAST, 233.20 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 30.27 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 84 036'00 "; THENCE NORTH 89 043'00" EAST, 72.93 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 30.50 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 9.15 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17 °11'06 "; THENCE NORTH 72 °31'54" EAST, 4.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.50 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 8.85 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17 °11'06 "; THENCE NORTH 89 °43'00" EAST, 13.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 017'00" EAST, 57.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 0.671 ACRE MORE OR LESS. PAGE 2OF3 :kd M: \0294\132 \Legal Descnpdons\A10 NExd Swr Esmt.doc WO 294- 132 6/26100 PARCEL "B" BEING A 20.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND LYING 10.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT POINT "X" AS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL "A" ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 84 019'00 EAST, 114.10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17 °55'00" EAST, 47.54 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 43.05 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08 °13'16 "; THENCE NORTH 09 °41'44" EAST, 124.45 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 75, AND BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS. THE SIDELINES OF SAID 20.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND ARE TO BE SHORTENED OR EXTENDED AS TERMINATE WESTERLY IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A" AND NORTHERLY IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 75. CONTAINS 0.151 ACRE MORE OR LESS. t'v -2g-OD DANA MICHAEL SrEGUIN L.S. 6215 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. PAGE 3OF3 :kd M:\0294 \132\Legal DescriptionslAl 0 NExd Sm Esmt.doc WO 294 -132 6 126 /00 �O AND 8& U�2P \cHA C S�L� FC � Q G O J ° L.S. 6215 Z , \Exp.3 /31/02/ j NUMBER DELTA ANGLE RADIUS LENGTH C 1 60'16'22' 20.50 1.56 C2 73'41'52' 8.00 10.29 CJ 14'3720' 40.50 IO.JJ C4 14' 11 '00' 40.50 10.03 C5 28'4810' 40.50 20.36 EXHIBIT "B 99 N 89'4J'43'W 46.84' PaT. (PARR- e7 pROPID9C1D 01717 OF 1111C��a 713 YR&CY MO. 28 =T79 Q EASEMENT TO LEUfrID1A COUNTY WATER DISTRICT O.aU ACRE 8 L L OT 70 J\AAP7 13356 I g 1� '! L= J5.67' l O D v 0 n 12.32',< n ��5�6j9918' 4\ C ze 79 c 47iy� _ Pte-, c}1 O ^ O q a\ \4P N M I1 C2 N J4'40 '58W (R) Tu g 9� 0 �I 2 a PARCEL "B" N I a 0.151 ACRE b - 2 mr A I ti 84.100 -E . N 88'IJ'J1 lY (R) FO a U �20.5'I t 28.5' & ASSOCIATES S A N D I S 6 O . I N C JHUNSAnR 2'40 E (R1 d �0' 4 J' 40' '�R =171.50' L =2.18' '16.03' N I PARCEL ';4 0.671 ACRE N 13 1 14 15 SHEET 1 OF s A) h. >l, h N u I h �. Old N 74'14'48W (R) J0.00' fs1 O bry n ^ O b b N 8P' o° O° m �/1 � o O �h "� vv v N 89.10'41 W (R) a of 36' J6' SEE SHEET 2 50 0 50 100 150 RANKING 199 Mum kam, X Ade IDD F GINIMNG San Dne G 9721 SIAVMNG PH(M)55e4500 F%tWKSIMU SCALE 1" = 50' File name: R: \0021 \0021L0II.dwg NUMBER I ELTA ANGLE RA01US LENGTH C I 171106' 30.50 9.15 C2 1711'06' 29.50 8.85 C3 68'28'16 21.50 25.69 C4 42'4106" 29.50 21.98 C5 1711'06" 21.50 6.45 C6 171106" 38 .50 11.55 71 0 b. u Ut A=27 ' 15 '58 " R= 30.50' C� L =14.51' A-40 'JO '34 L =42.07' N 71_0424 E (R) li N 82'0822_\ rr a.• h n lJ / J U NV, N 50 ■ 4=24 '55 '57' L= 25.89' 41 � ryA 04 EXHIBIT B „ SHEET 2 OF 3 Q LEUCAM COUNTY WAM? D1S/R/CT aa22 Am SEE SHEET 1 N 84'19'00 E 15A =O 1 '06 '19 R= 591.00' 28.5' PARCEL Jo ` = "'40 a6h ARE 9� i e PLR®POSEDD C07T 0 f MC�OM�4Qs irmcir mo. 98-M Z u 149.48' u°. w N 84' 19'00 E V P r. I d am.3 6' 00' 2 r $ 2 M I 1 R= 20.50' 2 LJ7 75 Ail J\p J3316a 72.93' v5 N 89'43'00 E in 1�000; N89'4J'00-E 11 N 89'43'00*E o p Q'N -27J258�yy�[R, 49.90' N_ 4 48/1 20.71' 29.19' L�111 v mhh P� N r V N D SCALE 1" = 50' F2A 111111 hid hM h" n 2 IN 150 � p go ro� 2 ti P.aa (PARR,a "A7 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF OF MAP NO. 13356 J6 HUNSAM I J6 & ASSOCIATES S A N D I [ G Q I N C PLANNING 1009 Huen[kea 5e St" IDD 84CHMNG Sm D M G 9M SURVEYING * (MWS45W- FX05B)55&W File name: R :\0021\0021L012.dwq v mhh P� N r V N D SCALE 1" = 50' F2A 111111 hid hM h" n 2 IN 150 � p go ro� 2 ti P.aa (PARR,a "A7 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF OF MAP NO. 13356 J6 I J6 A 0 � IU1 P z Q �IA w e a 1 � b a �$ 1�1 oIC� N N zl 0 � x EXHIBIT RNB " SHEET 3 OF 3 C NuE BLUE HERO :!S a AVE. � M SWALLOWTAI ANA DRIVE ROAD UAIL GARDENS OR yo S SFE PACIFIC LEUCAL`IA OCEAN VICINITY MAP ^� NOT TO SCALE 1 V ® HUNSAUR &ASSOCIA OCIATES S A M e 1 E C Q I N C %AMiNL 1M Wmdrs SL Sit 200 0124HRMC Sm Dino, V 9M YJKVEYM IH(&M4S81500- FX058)SW104 File name: R: \0071 \0021L015.dwg RECORDING REQUESTED BY: THE OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT AND WHEAT RECORDED MAIL TO: NAME OLIVENIiAN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT STREET ADDRESS 1966 OLrV'cNHAIN ROAD CITY ENCrNITAs STATE CALIFORNIA ZIP 92024 -976[ Th- liGlit IF THIS DQM&7 MS UORDED 04 a 16, 2000 DMA RW 2000 -031M GEM J. 514TH COmI, MM SO DEW CWgTV .QECQW,8 U74CE TIhEt 11:03 A4 :'his spats for Recorder's use Tax Parcel No. 254- 61I -.11 NO DOCUI BNTARY TRANSr�RTAX NO FEE GRANT OF EASEMENT BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED A DELAWARE C0RP0RAT7CN (hereinafter "GRANTOR ") hereby grans to OLIVENHA 1S MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, a public agency (hereinafter "GRANTEE" its successors, or assigns, the following described exclusive easement(s), in gross, for a right -of -way is upon, over, under and across the lands described below, and to erect, construct, reconstruct, replace, repair, maintain, and use a pipeline or pipelines for any and all purposes, together with any other facilities, fixtures and appurtenances, including, but not limited m, faeilides for power transmission and communication purposes, at such locations and elevations, upon, along, over and under the right -of -way described below as GRANTEE may now or hereafter determine in its sore discretion without any additions compensation therefor, together with the right Of in; ess and egress from the easements) by s practical route or roctes in, upon, over, or across the :and described below, together with the right tc use said easement(s) for access to GRANTEE'S rights of way situated in adjacen: lands. without any additional compensation therefor. The land encompassing m said easements) is situated in the County of Sao Diego, State of Caiifo.n a and is More particularly described as follows, to wit: LOT 75 OF CITY OF ENC11vtI7 AS TRACT NO. 94-066 UNITS 4, 5, AND 6, IN THE C11-Y OF ENCD;ITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP TiaREOF N0. 13356, FILED IN I HE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTERIBER 4, 1996. Said euemenr(s) of right -of -way in the aforesaid ;ands is particularly descried as follows: Fla SEE EXHIBIT "A" AND PLAT ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. ENGINEE CITY n aD-001/KIfV1�10o,yTw�yK111pu, er ayq,�,�yy�q� j 122L ; i ;' 7,0 *d VD: 91 00, u unC 8LS1— £SL- 09t —T:Xej IMW NitI4M113r1I_U GRAN'TOP., Its heirs, successors, or as. s, shall not erect or construe or permit to rected or constructed, any building, strueture or improvement of any kind on, over or under any potrion of the oasemcnt(s), nor shall GRAN701?, its heirs, successors, or assigns, plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora, nor dig or drill any hole or welts on any portion of the easemeot(s). In the event GRANTOR or its heirs, successors, and assigns places, or permirs to be placed, any eocroachmen: on any portion or the easement, GRANTEE shall have the right to remove the eneroachmen: after five (S) days written notice to GRANTOR, and GRANTOR or Its heirs, successors, and assigns agrees to pay all fees and costs, including staff and erginaaring costs and aromey's fees, incurred by GRANTEE it,, removing the encroachment Al: fees and costs incurred by GRANTEE, including staff and engineering costs and attorney's fees, shall cam interest at the rates set by California law for interes: onjudgments. GRANTEE may, in its soie discretion, erect, maintain, cruse gates in all fences which now cross or laze; cross any portion of the easement(s). GRAN—ME shall also be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brash, or ether vegetation or fiats from time to time as GRANTtE deterrnines in ies sole discretion without any additional compensation. GRANTEE shall be entitled to partition, assign, joint venture, or share all or any pomor, of said easement(s) with any other person o; entity, including, but not limited to, any person or entity supplying services or facilities to the public as GRANTEE may determine in its sole discretion without paying any additional compensation to GRANTOR or GRANTOR's heirs, muccessors, or assigns, tharofor. GRANTOR, its heirs, successors, or assigns, agrees that no Other easement or easements shall be g.-antcd on, under, or over said easement(s) without obtaining the prior written consent e.' GRANTEE. GRANTEE may at any time increase is use of the easement(s), change the location of pipelines or other facilities within the boundaries of the easements) right -of- -way, or modify the size of existing pipelines or other improvements as it may determine in its sole discretion from time to time without paying any additional compensation to GRAN70R or GRANTOR's heirs, successors, or assigns, provided GRANTEE does not expand its use of the easement(s) beyond the easement(s) boundaries descrbed herein. It is also understood and agreed by the parties that the GRANTOR and the GRANTOR's heirs, successors, or assigns, shall not increase or decrease or permit to be Increased or decreased the ground elevations within the above - described easement(s) which exists at the time this document is executed, without obtaining the prior written consent of the GRANTEE. In the event of any dispute involving this Agreement, whether or not litigation is commenced, or if Any arbitration proceeding, administrative proceeding or litigation in law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brougr, to enforce or intetyxet the provisions or performance o`.'said easement(s), the prevailing: party snail be entitled to at,, award of all attorney's fees and the costs of the proceeding, which shall be determined by the court of the presiding officer having authority to make this determination. GRANTOR expressly warrants and represents that GRANTOR has the power to grant said easement(s) in accordance with is terms. GRANTOR has executed said Easement(s) this !at day of June 2000. BARRA: 7 AYMRICAN INICORPO.RATED, A Deiaware Comoration as Owneni RIW N0. l 170880 -15 DRAWN BY RG CHECKED BY SMH ACCT.NO. SD- 001 -494.12 DATE MAY, 2000 el Armstrong. Assistant Tice President y.�00iJw- I]IM:1�iwn vw..uW.;T{,,.ni �LvmnuaNyWy �W `=0'd b0: 9i 00, Lz unc KSI- £SL- 09Z -T: xp3 2MH NIHHN3l1I10 DATE 6/1/00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego Barratt f _erican Incorporated (Grantor) On June 1st, 2000 before me, the undersigned, a Ni otary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared G. Sack Becker Vice President co to /�+./�J.M1hl.FiCFx][j[][][ "'�....•.. jex' -1-lp Jl mw` "$/NA subscribed to the within instrument and aeknowled ed to me that h �J 8 %�q[ executed the same in h ism authorized capacity(b*, and that by hiskevttajd%signature($) on the instrument the person($1 t xspsm 6e hxitaft �tjCtet� executed the instrument. HTIIJESS my hand DATE 6/1/00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego Barratt American Itcorporated (Grantor) On June lat, 2000 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared J. ?Michael Armsrron , Assistant Vice President personally known to me mxptxmdxocxmxtt xnddoaxKto be the person(!!;] whose name( is/3FX subscribed to the within instrument and ac'artowledged to me that heAS1 Xjltexeeuted the sarre in hiS* Fin authorized capacity(i14 and that by his.%i56"Iengnature(5� on the instrument the persons t g$tj �}te{ jF�l3FRys} executed the instrument WIMSS ay hand and offic se i IQilS17NAC'CONMEtI COMM. #1249943 NOIARrPuell,". ,--RNA SAY GO CO, UNT' Signature Cm . EiMJA4UAR Y I. 2r!Lg T(1Qp,�w.11w WOibrnvA.'M041SGran, ofEUeTni.QONgnS'IUW b0.d S3:9T 03, ?ii unf 8)-ST- 25-)-09)--T:xej a% NIliRNW-D v I EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LOT 75 OF MAP NO. 13356 IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 4, 1996, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE EASTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT COURSE IN THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 75 SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON SAID MAP AS NORTH 89 °13' 0" WEST, 435.01 FEET: THENCE ALONG SAID COURSE, NORTH 89 °12'10" WEST, 36.01 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY, NORTH OC °46'50' EAST, 20.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THAT 20 -FOOT WIDE EASEMENT GRANTED TO OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT PER DOCUMENT RECORDED ON MARCH 25, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81- 089130 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE, NORTH 74 023'19" EAST, 60.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 °19'00" EAST, 151.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05 °41'00" EAST, 20.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 84 °19'00" WEST, 127.02 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT EASEMENT; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 89 013'10" WEST, 84.94 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 0.081 ACRE MORE OR LESS. —�G 2- do DANA MICHAEL SE UIN L.S. 6215 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. AV MALegal610294\132 \132e04.doc W0294-132 5!11/00 S3'd 50:97 00, ZL unC PAGE 1 OF 1 8L51- £SZ- 09Z -I:�d ENO _ 0 A L.S. 6215 Z Exp. 3131102/ GTIW NIdHN3)I-l0 S--AL-Z: 1 . 60' 77— WATERLINE EASZMENT PORrIUN OF EXISTING EASEMENT TO 0L"VENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT REC. ON 3 -25 -81 AS FILE IJO. 87-0,69130 OF D.R. o g TO BE QUITCLAIMED. i I h 4 cp W C I R C � O � N o � I z A Q 1� Z I I HA p Z33 X07 aZ I I II I I I f � I I fill P.O.C. r, 3 IL 00'4650' £ • 20.G0" M h ul 3 -31 —OZ DANA M. SEGUIN L.S. 6215 EXP. 3/31/02 PROJECT, CTY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -171 (NORTH MESA LOWER) REFERENCES VALVE MAP, 8 -3 LD. NO. N' A PLAT EAs=wvr REOC Fm Br nE OLIVENNAIN MUMClPAL WATER DISTRICT ACCK NO, SD -pot- 494 -12 Q1W N0. 1170889 -15 TAX PAR. 254- 611 -07 BASE MAP ' DATE APRIL 2000 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO INC. 10179 HUENNEKENS STREET SAN DIEGO, GA 62121 (M) 558 -4500 SCALE: 7" a 60' R: 0021 /0021L01QCwg 90'd 90:9T 00, LL UnC KST -£S4- 094 -T; Xed ZTIA NId-N3hI73 This is to cer'sfy that the interest in real proper -,y conveyed by the Deed or Grant s1atecd From rY !'r b� er; J�G9CCT- Rt A tC,r to the Olivenhain Dianieipal Water District, apolitical co poration and/or governmental agency, is herebv accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behaifof the Board ofDirectozs pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution of the Olivenhain Municipal Water District adopted on April 6, 1961, and the grantee's consent to Recordation thereof by its du] y authorizeedd�of5c-er. Dated: LO'd 90: 9T 00. LL unr 8LST- £SL- 09L -T:xe3 CIN NIdIiN311I10 Hunsaker and Associates San Diego Inc. 10179 Huennekens StreetPage 1 of 1 San Diego, CA 92121 Closure Calculations for ENCINITAS 98 -171 Wednesday July 12, 2000 —r� 09:03 Report Created by: KTH R: \0021 \MAPCHECK \OPEN- ESMT.m DWMICMELKOM' E.P. Data Locator: 0021- ' ENCINITAS 98 -171 j * 3 - 31 -,,> P LOT 1 SIGHT -ESMT Total Courses: 5 '. Course No. Bearing Distance Northing Easting Starting Coordinates: 971336.5293 247135.3595 1) S 00 017'00" E 26.68' 971309.8496 247135.4914 2) N 45 017'00" W 48.87' 971344.2346 247100.7646 Brg. to Rad. Pt.: N 03 052105" E Radius: 21.50' 3) Delta: 04 °09'05" Length: 1.56' Brg. from Rad. Pt.: S 00 017'00" E 971344.1858 247102.3238 4) N 89 043'00" E 13.00' 971344.2501 247115.3236 Brg. to Rad. Pt.: S 00 017'00" E Radius: 29.50' 5) Delta: 42 041'06" Length: 21.98' Brg. from Rad. Pt.: N 42 024106" E 971336.5353 247135.3596 Error of Closure: N 00 057'17" E 0.0060' Error North: 0.0060 Error East: 0.0001 Precision: 1 part in 18679 Perimeter: 112.09' Area: 546 Sq. Ft., 0.013 Acres Ending Coordinates: 971336.5353 247135.3596 Hunsaker and Associates San Diego Inc. 10179 Huennekens StreetPage 1 of 1 San Diego, CA 92121 Closure Calculations for ENCINITAS 98 -171 Wednesday July 12, 2000 09:04 Report Created by: KTH R: \0021 \MAPCHECK \OPEN- ESMT.mck E.P. Data Locator: 0021 - ENCINITAS 98 -171 LOT 17 OPENSPACE Total Courses: 7 Course No. Bearing Distance Northing Easting Starting Coordinates: 971819.1809 246634.9288 1) S 36 °02'35" E 119.46' 971722.5884 246705.2180 2) S 54 000'00" W 24.00' 971708.4816 246685.8016 3) N 87 000100" W 165.00' 971717.1170 246521.0277 4) N 27 000100" W 23.00' 971737.6102 246510.5859 5) N 32 032127" E 49.38' 971779.2380 246537.1474 6) N 89 005'50" E 75.36' 971780.4253 246612.4980 7) N 30 003'50" E 44.78' 971819.1809 246634.9312 Error of Closure: N 90 000'00" E 0.0024' Error North: 0.0000 Error East: 0.0024 Precision: 1 part in 208742 Perimeter: 500.98' Area: 12092 Sq. Ft., 0.278 Acres Ending Coordinates: 971819.1809 246634.9312 Hunsaker and Associates San Diego Inc. 10179 Huennekens StreetPage 1 of 1 San Diego, CA 92121 Closure Calculations for ENCINITAS 98 -171 Wednesday July 12, 2000 09.05 Report Created by: KTH R: \0021 \MAPCHECK \OPEN- ESMT.mck E.P. Data Locator: 0021 - ENCINITAS 98 -171 LOT 17 OPENSPACE -A Total Courses: 6 Course No. Bearing Distance Northing Easting Starting Coordinates: 971823.3563 246091.1354 1) N 85 000'00" W 68.00' 971829.2829 246023.3942 2) N 89 °00'00" W 76.84' 971830.6239 245946.5659 3) N 06 °53108" W 5.95' 971836.5310 245945.8526 4) N 83 006152" E 69.62' 971844.8775 246014.9705 5) S 77 029113" E 61.67' 971831.5160 246075.1756 6) S 62 055122" E 17.93' 971823.3544 246091.1404 Error of Closure: S 69 011'36" E 0.0053' Error North: - 0.0019 Error East: 0.0050 Precision: 1 part in 56089 Perimeter: 300.01' Area: 1443 Sq. Ft., 0.033 Acres Ending Coordinates: 971823.3544 246091.1404 Hunsaker and Associates San Diego Inc. 10179 Huennekens StreetPage 1 of 1 San Diego, CA 92121 Closure Calculations for ENCINITAS 98 -171 Wednesday July 12, 2000 09:05 Report Created by: KTH R: \0021 \MAPCHECK \OPEN- ESMT.mck E.P. Data Locator: 0021 - ENCINITAS 98 -171 LOT 19 SIGHT -ESMT Total Courses: 4 Course No. Bearing Distance Northing Easting Starting Coordinates: 1) S 00 017100" E 12.89' Brg 2) Brg. 3) 4) to Rad. Pt.: N 68 °45'16" W Radius: 21.50' Delta: 68 028116" Length: 25.69' from Rad. Pt.: S 00 017100" E S 89 043'00" W N 44 043'00" E 37.48' 971398.8317 971385.9419 971372.2340 971372.2019 971398.8350 Error of Closure: N 48 016114" E 0.0050' Error North: 0.0033 Error East: 0.0037 Precision: 1 part in 16652 Perimeter: 82.56 Area: 276 Sq. Ft., 0.006 Acres 247129.9836 247130.0473 247110.1162 247103.6163 247129.9873 Ending Coordinates: 971398.8350 247129.9873 Hunsaker and Associates San Diego Inc. 10179 Huennekens StreetPage 1 of 2 San Diego, CA 92121 Closure Calculations for ENCINITAS 98 -171 Wednesday July 12, 2000 09:05 Report Created by: KTH R: \0021 \MAPCHECK \OPEN- ESMT.mck E.P. Data Locator: 0021 - ENCINITAS 98 -171 LOT 19 OPENSPACE 1 Total Courses: 18 Course No. Bearing Distance Northing Easting Starting Coordinates: 971678.5889 1) N 35 000'00" E 231.40' 971868.1407 2) N 56 008115" E 29.16' 971884.3887 3) N 82 035'00" E 61.60' 971892.3403 4) N 63 000100" E 51.00' 971915.4938 5) S 89 043143" E 129.30' 971914.8816 6) S 76 000'00" E 80.39' 971895.4335 7) S 17 055'00" W 162.75' 971740.5761 Brg. to Rad. Pt.: S 72 005'00" E Radius: 591.00' 8) Delta: 18 012'00" Length: 187.73' Brg. from Rad. Pt.. S 89 043'00" W 02161MINM- I ,, 9) S 00 017'00" E 133.01' 971422.8366 10) N 44 043'00" E 7.07' 971427.8605 11) N 00 017'00" W 128.02' 971555.8789 Brg. to Rad. Pt.: Radius: 12) Delta: Length: Brg. from Rad. Pt.: N 89 043'00" E 586.00' 18 °12'00" 186.14' N 72 005'00" W Page 1 of 2 Pages 246737.2359 246869.9615 246894.1753 246955.2599 247000.7012 247129.9998 247208.0019 247157.9346 247129.2817 247129.9394 247134.9139 247134.2808 Created By: KTH R: \0021 \MAPCHECK \OPEN- ESMT.mck ENCINITAS 98 -171 Wednesday July 12, 2000 971739.0487 247162.6915 13) N 17 055'00" E 193.17' 971922.8509 247222.1170 14) N 76 003'25" W 90.06' 971944.5515 247134.7106 15) N 89 035'12" W 324.45' 971946.8921 246810.2690 16) S 77 004'17" W 120.01' 971920.0414 246693.3013 17) S 30 003150" W 116.52' 971819.1971 246634.9288 18) S 36 002'35" E 173.88' 971678.6019 246737.2383 Error of Closure: N 10 °27136" E 0.0132' Error North: 0.0130 Error East: 0.0024 Precision: 1 part in 181976 Perimeter: 2405.66' Area: 53272 Sq. Et., 1.223 Acres Ending Coordinates: 971678.6019 246737.2383 Page 2 of 2 Pages User-14ame: Davey te: 05 -16 -00 Project: !0021 ENCINITAS RANCH me: 14:52:01 Create Mapcheck Reports Page: 1 Lot Name: OS 1 Lot Description: OS LOT 1 Lot ID: none Lot Owner: none Lot Area (Square Feet): 6643.65 Lot Area (Acres): 0.15 ' Lot Perimeter: 567.21 �� MaY 3 o Llx1U U Closing Direction: S26 020'52 11E Closing Distance: 0.003 ENGINEERING SERVICES Course Data: ( Mapcheck Through Radius Points Method) CITY OF ENCINITAS Point Northing Easting Direction Distance Begin 971165.60829 247048.62815 N00 046150 "E 62.344 971227.94650 247049.47745 N90000100 "E 20.199 971227.94650 247069.67645 582013158 "E 10.241 971226.56245 247079.82349 S67048111"E 12.833 971221.71425 247091.70545 S53045110 "E 8.214 971216.85755 247098.32982 S61035108 "E 4.519 971214.70720 247102.30441 583056158 "E 3.967 971214.28906 247106.24931 N80008124 "E 4.186 971215.00588 247110.37348 N57004119 "E 4.451 971217.42537 247114.10945 N35023113 "E 5.495 971221.90523 247117.29157 N24055105 "E 7.681 971228.87121 247120.52775 N14043152 "E 7.650 971236.26976 247122.47301 N03023134 "E 81.820 971317.94635 247127.31516 N45017100 "W 37.365 PC 971344.23642 247100.76379 RP 971365.68744 247102.21416 Curve Direction: CCW Radial In: N03052'05 "E D.O.0 Arc: 266029'31" D.O.0 Chord: N/A Radius: 21.500 Delta angle: 04009005" Tangent length: 0.779 Arc length: 1.558 Chord Direction: 588012128 11E Chord length: 1.557 External: 0.014 Middle ordinate: 0.014 Radial Out: S00017100 11E Point Northing Easting Direction Distance PT 971344.18770 247102.32048 N89043100 "E 13.000 PC 971344.25199 247115.32032 RP 971314.75235 247115.46620 Curve Direction: CW Radial In: S0o017'00 11E No. 6215 EXP. 3 -31- 02 04 I:� User- Akame: DaveV te: 05 -16 -00 Project: 10021 ENCINITAS RANCH .me: 14:52:01 Create Mapcheck Reports Page: 2 D.O.0 Arc: 194 013123" D.O.0 Chord: N/A Radius: 29.500 Delta angle: 42 041106" Tangent length: 11.527 Arc length: 21.977 Chord Direction: S68 °56'27 "E Chord length: 21.473 External: 2.172 Middle ordinate: 2.023 Radial Out: N42 024106 11E Point Northing Easting Direction Distance PT 971336.53620 247135.35875 S00 017100 "E 172.121 971164.41731 247136.20990 N89 013'10 "W 87.591 End 971165.61055 247048.62703 Error of Closure 1 : 225118.194 Departure in Y (Northing): - 0.00226 Departure in X ( Easting): 0.00112 User Name: Davey Project: 10021 ENCINITAS RANCH Create Mapcheck Reports Lot Name: Lot Description: Lot ID: Lot Owner: Lot Area (Square Feet) Lot Area (Acres): Lot Perimeter: Closing Direction: Closing Distance: OS 2 OS LOT 2 none none 3988.72 0.09 277.27 N59 053122 "W 0.001 te: 05 -16 -00 me: 14:52:11 Page: 1 Course Data:(Mapcheck Through Radius Points Method) ------------------------------------------------- --- -- ------- ---- ---- ------ - - -- Point Northing Begin 971166.68442 N00 046150 "E 971216.50980 246970.31431 971215.10139 67.848 971218.95305 N52 058121 11E 971224.66065 247043.25391 971227.94609 5.828 971165.60788 End 971166.68408 Error of Closure Departure in Y (Northing) Departure in X (Fasting): Easting Direction Distance 246969.63548 N00 046150 "E 49.830 246970.31431 S88 048138 "E 67.848 247038.14769 N52 058121 11E 6.396 247043.25391 N11 039159 "E 5.828 247044.43241 N56 055'48 "E 6.021 247049.47803 S00 046'50 "W 62.344 247048.62873 N89 013110 "W 79.000 246969.63606 1 : 412598.800 0.00034 - 0.00058 User Name: Davey te: 03 -03 -00 Project: 10021 ENCINITAS RANCH lme: 09:16:51 Create Mapcheck Reports Page: 1 Lot Name: 6 Lot Description: Lot 6 Lot ID: none Lot Owner: none Lot Area (Square Feet): 13059.1267 Lot Area (Acres): 0.2998 Lot Perimeter: 495.1781 Parent Name: None Parent Description: Parent Area (Square Feet): 0.0000 Parent Area (Acres): 0.0000 Percent of Parent: 0.0000 Closing Direction: N73011105 "E Closing Distance: 0.001 Course Data:(Mapcheck Through Radius Points Method) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Point Northing Easting Direction Distance Begin 971499.7044 246750.2032 N66056116 11E 48.091 971518.5431 246794.4508 N84 019100 11E 132.000 971531.6151 246925.8019 S05 041100 11E 75.000 971456.9838 246933.2292 S84 019100 11W 179.432 971439.2146 246754.6792 N04 013158 11W 60.655 End 971499.7041 246750.2023 Error of Closure 1 : 542372.4929 Departure in Y (Northing): 0.0003 Departure in X ( Easting): 0.0009 T[LWR -712 D YTA No. 6215 EXP. 3 -31- 0 2 User Name: Davey Project: !0021 ENCINITAS RANCH Create Mapcheck Reports Lot Name: Lot Description: Lot ID: Lot Owner: Lot Area (Square Feet): Lot Area (Acres): Lot Perimeter: Parent Name: Parent Description: Parent Area (Square Feet) Parent Area (Acres): Percent of Parent: Closing Direction: Closing Distance: 6 -OS Lot 6 Open Space none none 1959.9752 0.0450 190.1682 None 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N10 006'33 "W 0.000 Course Data:(Mapcheck Through Radius Points Method) ite: 03 -03 -00 ime: 09:17:18 Page: 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Point Northing Basting Direction Distance Begin 971499.7044 246750.2032 N66056'16"E 29.157 971511.1261 246777.0300 S09 048103 "E 29.637 971481.9216 246782.0749 SO4 052145 "E 39.788 971442.2778 246785.4590 S84 019100 11W 30.931 971439.2147 246754.6801 N04 013'58 "W 60.655 End 971499.7043 246750.2032 Error of Closure 1 : 1334122.8294 Departure in Y (Northing): 0.0001 Departure in X (Basting): - 0.0000 User Name: DaveV ite: 03 -03 -00 Project: 10021 ENCINITAS RANCH .ime: 08:22:46 Create Mapcheck Reports Page: 1 Lot Name: 16 Lot Description: Lot 16 Lot ID: none Lot Owner: none Lot Area (Square Feet): 11693.1727 Lot Area (Acres): 0.2684 Lot Perimeter: 435.2731 Parent Name: None Parent Description: 247129.9324 Parent Area (Square Feet): 0.0000 Parent Area (Acres): 0.0000 Percent of Parent: 0.0000 Closing Direction: S39 013123 11E Closing Distance: 0.000 Course Data:(Mapcheck Through Radius Points Method) Point Northing Basting Direction Distance Begin 971473.0731 246980.8705 N84 019100 11E 149.475 971487.8757 247129.6107 S00 017100 11E 65.053 971422.8234 247129.9324 S44 043100 11W 30.406 971401.2171 247108.5387 S89 043100 11W 6.500 PC 971401.1850 247102.0388 RP 971371.6853 247102.1847 Curve Direction: CCW Radial In: S00 017100 11E D.O.0 Arc: 194 013123" D.O.0 Chord: N/A Radius: 29.500 Delta angle: 17°11106" Tangent length: 4.458 Arc length: 8.848 Chord Direction: S81 007127 11W Chord length: 8.815 External: 0.335 Middle ordinate: 0.331 Radial Out: N17028106 "W Point Northing Basting Direction Distance PT 971399.8249 247093.3294 S72 031154 11W 4.472 PC 971398.4825 247089.0637 RP 971427.5759 247079.9082 Curve Direction: CW Radial In: N17 028106 11W D.O.0 Arc: 187 °51'18" D.O.0 Chord: N/A Radius: 30.500 Delta angle: 17 °11'06" Tangent length: 4.609 -User Name: Davey ate: 03 -03 -00 Project: !0021 ENCINITAS RANCH _ime: 08:22:46 Create Mapcheck Reports Page: 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arc length: 9.148 Chord Direction: 581007'27 "W Chord length: 9.114 External: 0.346 Middle ordinate: 0.342 Radial Out: 500017100 11E Point Northing Easting Direction Distance PT 971397.0763 247080.0590 589043'00 "W 72.928 PC 971396.7156 247007.1319 RP 971417.2154 247007.0305 Curve Direction: CW Radial In: N00017100 11W D.O.0 Arc: 279029130" D.O.0 Chord: N/A Radius: 20.500 Delta angle: 84036100" Tangent length: 18.654 Arc length: 30.269 Chord Direction: N47059'00 "W Chord length: 27.594 External: 7.217 Middle ordinate: 5.338 Radial Out: 584019100 "W Point Northing Easting Direction Distance PT 971415.1853 246986.6313 N05041100 11W 58.174 End 971473.0733 246980.8703 Error of Closure 1 : 1616510.0797 Departure in Y (Northing): - 0.0002 Departure in X ( Easting): 0.0002 User Name: Davey Northing ite: 03 -03 -00 Project: !0021 ENCINITAS RANCH Begin ime: 09:38:34 Create Mapcheck Reports 592.874 Page: 1 Lot Name: 17 -G 413.419 Lot Description: Lot 17 Gross 246737.2370 S04020100 11E Lot ID: none 971534.0377 246748.1904 Lot Owner: none 971551.5165 Lot Area (Square Feet): 501666.8006 20.000 Lot Area (Acres): 11.5167 584019100 11W 132.000 Lot Perimeter: 3569.6297 246794.4523 566056116 11W Parent Name: None 971499.7041 246750.2047 Parent Description: 435.006 971505.6302 Parent Area (Square Feet): 0.0000 330.000 Parent Area (Acres): 0.0000 N89013110 11W 330.000 Percent of Parent: 0.0000 245981.1229 N00043112 "E Closing Direction: S86 035'41 "W 971510.1257 245985.2697 Closing Distance: 0.001 End 972122.4513 Course Data:(Mapcheck Through Radius Points Method) Point Northing Easting Direction Distance Begin 972122.4512 245911.3254 S79 020155 11E 592.874 972012.8686 246493.9842 S36 002135 11E 413.419 971678.5883 246737.2370 S04020100 11E 144.965 971534.0377 246748.1904 N84019100 "E 176.500 971551.5165 246923.8228 S05041100 11E 20.000 971531.6149 246925.8034 584019100 11W 132.000 971518.5429 246794.4523 566056116 11W 48.091 971499.7041 246750.2047 N89013110 11W 435.006 971505.6302 246315.2391 500043112 "W 330.000 971175.6562 246311.0923 N89013110 11W 330.000 971180.1518 245981.1229 N00043112 "E 330.000 971510.1257 245985.2697 N06053108 11W 616.774 End 972122.4513 245911.3268 Error of Closure 1 : 2578066.9845 Departure in Y (Northing): - 0.0001 Departure in X ( Easting): - 0.0014 User Name: Davey ite: 03 -03 -00 Project: !0021 ENCINITAS RANCH ime: 09:38:12 Create Mapcheck Reports Page: 1 ------------------------------------------------- Lot Name: -- -------- --------------------- 17 -N Lot Description: Lot 17 Net Lot ID: none Lot owner: none Lot Area (Square Feet): 497803.2330 Lot Area (Acres): 11.4280 Lot Perimeter: 3227.4309 Parent Name: None Parent Description: S03 021125 11E Parent Area (Square Feet): 0.0000 Parent Area (Acres): 0.0000 Percent of Parent: 0.0000 Closing Direction: N70 056101 "W Closing Distance: 0.001 Course Data:(Mapcheck Through Radius Points Method) Point Northing Easting Direction Distance Begin 972122.4512 245911.3254 S79 020'55 "E 592.874 972012.8686 246493.9842 S36 002135 "E 413.419 971678.5883 246737.2370 SO4 020100 "E 144.965 971534.0377 246748.1904 S03 021125 11E 34.393 971499.7037 246750.2043 N89 013110 11W 435.006 971505.6297 246315.2387 S00 043112 11W 330.000 971175.6558 246311.0919 N89 013110 11W 330.000 971180.1513 245981.1225 N00 043112 11E 330.000 971510.1253 245985.2693 N06 053108 "W 616.774 End 972122.4509 245911.3264 Error of Closure 1 : 3019794.2671 Departure in Y (Northing): 0.0003 Departure in X ( Easting): - 0.0010 0-r L er Name: DaveV Project: 10021 ENCINITAS RANCH Create Mapcheck Reports Lot Name: 19 Lot Description: Lot 19 Lot ID: none Lot Owner: none Lot Area (Square Feet): 87164.8746 Lot Area (Acres): 2.0010 Lot Perimeter: 2817.5181 Parent Name: None Parent Description: 247162.6856 Parent Area (Square Feet): 0.0000 Parent Area (Acres): 0.0000 Percent of Parent: 0.0000 Closing Direction: N13 °09'11 "E Closing Distance: 0.000 Course Data:(Mapcheck Through Radius Points Method) ite: 03 -03 -00 ime: 08:23:06 Page: 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Point Northing Easting Direction Distance Begin 972012.8696 246493.9839 S84 018113 11E 737.219 971939.6954 247227.5624 S17 055100 11W 210.890 PC 971739.0325 247162.6856 RP 971558.7594 247720.2675 Curve Direction: CCW Radial In: S72 005100 "E D.O.0 Arc: 09 046139" D.O.0 Chord: 09 047'22" Radius: 586.000 Delta angle: 18 012100" Tangent length: 93.862 Arc length: 186.143 Chord Direction: S08049100 11W Chord length: 185.361 External: 7.470 Middle ordinate: 7.376 Radial Out: S89 043100 "W Point Northing Easting Direction Distance PT 971555.8616 247134.2746 S00 017100 "E 140.905 PC 971414.9583 247134.9714 RP 971422.7491 247114.9327 Curve Direction: CW Radial In: N68 045116 11W D.O.0 Arc: 266 029131" D.O.0 Chord: N/A Radius: 21.500 Delta angle: 68 028116" Tangent length: 14.631 Arc length: 25.693 Chord Direction: S55 028'52 "W % I L4'er Name: DaveV Project: !0021 ENCINITAS RANCH Create Mapcheck Reports Chord length: External: Middle ordinate: Radial Out: Point Northing PT 971401.2494 971401.2173 971422.8236 PC 971555.8370 RP 971558.7595 247108.5391 Curve Direction: 247129.9328 Radial In: 247129.2750 D.O.0 Arc: 247720.2678 D.O.0 Chord: Radius: Delta angle: Tangent length: Arc length: Chord Direction: Chord length: External: Middle ordinate: Radial Out: Point Northing PT 971740.5709 971895.4312 971914.8788 971915.4912 971892.3377 971884.3861 971868.1409 971678.5891 End 972012.8694 Error of Closure Departure in Y (Northing) Departure in X ( Easting): Easting CW N89 043'00 "E 09 °41'41" 09 °42'23" 591.000 18 °12'00" 94.663 187.731 N08 049'00 "E 186.943 7.533 7.438 N72 005'00 "W Direction 247157.9283 N17 055'00 "E 247207.9966 N76 000100 "W 247129.9965 N89 043'43 "W 247000.6979 S63 000'00 "W 246955.2566 S82 035'00 "W 246894.1719 S56 008'15 "W 246869.9623 S35 000'00 "W 246737.2367 N36 002'35 "W 246493.9839 1 : 14932894 0.0002 0.0000 8691 ate: 03 -03 -00 ime: 08:23:06 Page: 2 Distance 6.500 30.406 133.015 Distance 162.753 80.388 129.300 51.000 61.600 29.155 231.400 413.419 24.192 4.506 3.725 S00 017100 11E Easting Direction 247115.0390 S89 043'00 "W 247108.5391 N44043'00 "E 247129.9328 N00 017'00 "W 247129.2750 247720.2678 Easting CW N89 043'00 "E 09 °41'41" 09 °42'23" 591.000 18 °12'00" 94.663 187.731 N08 049'00 "E 186.943 7.533 7.438 N72 005'00 "W Direction 247157.9283 N17 055'00 "E 247207.9966 N76 000100 "W 247129.9965 N89 043'43 "W 247000.6979 S63 000'00 "W 246955.2566 S82 035'00 "W 246894.1719 S56 008'15 "W 246869.9623 S35 000'00 "W 246737.2367 N36 002'35 "W 246493.9839 1 : 14932894 0.0002 0.0000 8691 ate: 03 -03 -00 ime: 08:23:06 Page: 2 Distance 6.500 30.406 133.015 Distance 162.753 80.388 129.300 51.000 61.600 29.155 231.400 413.419 riser Name: Davev Project: 10021 ENCINITAS RANCH Create Mapcheck Reports Lot Name: Lot Description: Lot ID: Lot Owner: Lot Area (Square Feet): Lot Area (Acres): Lot Perimeter: Parent Name: Parent Description: Parent Area (Square Feet): Parent Area (Acres): Percent of Parent: Closing Direction: Closing Distance: PDE Private Drain Esmt CL & Wly line none none 1006.7919 0.0231 413.0966 None 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N00 058'03 "E 0.000 Course Data:(Mapcheck Through Radius Points Method) ate: 03 -03 -00 -ime: 10:09:31 Page: 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Point Northing Easting Direction Distance Begin 971756.8424 246967.0542 N07005100 "W 131.115 971886.9567 246950.8860 N22 018105 "W 32.351 PC 971916.8879 246938.6095 RP 971899.8113 246896.9755 Curve Direction: CCW Radial In: S67 041155 "W D.O.0 Arc: 127019126" D.O.0 Chord: N/A Radius: 45.000 Delta angle: 37 057'50" Tangent length: 15.479 Arc length: 29.817 Chord Direction: N41017100 11W Chord length: 29.274 External: 2.588 Middle ordinate: 2.447 Radial Out: N29 044105 11E Point Northing Basting Direction Distance PT 971938.8862 246919.2948 N60 015'55 "W 5.000 971941.3662 246914.9532 N29 044105 11E 5.000 971945.7078 246917.4331 S60 015155 11E 5.000 PC 971943.2279 246921.7748 RP 971899.8113 246896.9755 Curve Direction: CW Radial In: S29 044105 11W D.O.0 Arc: 114035130" D.O.0 Chord: 179 059159" Radius: 50.000 Delta angle: 37057'50" Tangent length: 17.199 User Name: DaveV Project: !0021 ENCINITAS RANCH Create Mapcheck Reports ate: 03 -03 -00 .ime: 10:09:31 Page: 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arc length: 33.130 Chord Direction: S41 °17100 11E Chord length: 32.527 External: 2.875 Middle ordinate: 2.719 Radial Out: N67 041155 11E Point Northing Easting Direction Distance PT 971918.7853 246943.2355 S22 018105 "E 33.019 971888.2361 246955.7655 S07 005100 11E 133.405 PC 971755.8492 246972.2161 RP 971716.6585 246962.0014 Curve Direction: CCW Radial In: S14 036131 "W D.O.0 Arc: 141 °28'16" D.O.0 Chord: N/A Radius: 40.500 Delta angle: 07026130" Tangent length: 2.634 Arc length: 5.260 Chord Direction: N79 006144 "W Chord length: 5.257 External: 0.086 Middle ordinate: 0.085 Radial Out: N07 °10'01 "E Point Northing Easting Direction Distance End 971756.8421 246967.0542 Error of Closure 1 : 1460305.1104 Departure in Y (Northing): 0.0003 Departure in X (Fasting): 0.0000 User Name: DaveV Project: SSM N MESA MAP Sht 3 Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: BOY Description: Bou-dary �,`� SAND S��G ,,� LS. !v . 9 03 �-/ 6ocr ,, OF CA,\E��� -T ez CE$ Date: 06 -09 -99 Time: 09:42:05 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 972122.4512 245911.3254 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 79" 20' 55" E 592.874 972012.8686 246493.9842 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 84" 18' 13" E 774.054 971936.0383 247264.2157 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 17" 55' 00" W 218.687 971727.9565 247196.9403 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 72° 05' 00" E 550.000 971558.7581 247720.2680 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 18" 12' 0011CCW 174.707 88.096 S 08° 49' 00" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 173.974 6.922 7.011 10" 25' 03" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 89" 43' 00" W 550.000 971556.0384 247170.2748 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00° 17' DO" E 392.120 971163.9231 247172.2138 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89° 13' 10" W 397.597 971169.3395 246774.6537 Direction Distance Northing Fasting N 04° 13' 58" W 331.267 971499.7030 246750.2033 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89" 13' 10" W 435.006 971505.6290 246315.2377 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00" 43' 12" W 330.000 971175.6551 246311.0909 Direction Distance Northing Easting ENGINEERING SERVI CITY OF EN CIN ITA N 89" 13. 10" W 330.000 971180.1506 245981.1215 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 00° 43' 12' E 330.000 971510.1245 245985.2683 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 06" 53' 08" W 616.774 972122.4501 245911.3254 Closure: N 00° 41' 52" W 0.001 0.0011 N - 0.0000 E Perimeter: 4923.087 Feet Closure Ratio: 4576850 Area: 887327.6243 Square Feet - 20.3702 Acres �,`� SAND S��G ,,� LS. !v . 9 03 �-/ 6ocr ,, OF CA,\E��� -T ez CE$ Date: 06 -09 -99 Time: 09:42:05 Page: 1 User Name: Day.V Project: 65M N MESA MAP Sht 3 Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: GRID Description: CC GRID Date: 06 -08 -99 Time: 09:42:12 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 967492.0920 251387.1130 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00° 25. 38" W 1015.115 966477.0052 251379.5439 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 44. 27' 40" W 6574.203 971169.1850 246774.8078 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 89° 13' 10" E 397.583 971163.7687 247172.3540 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 48° 56' 21" E 5589.759 967492.0798 251387.1026 Closure: N 40° 30' 09" E 0.016 0.0122 N 0.0104 E Perimeter: 13576.660 Feet Closure Ratio: 848979 Area: 3073275.7681 Square Feet - 70.SS27 Acres Date: 06 -08 -99 Time: 09:42:12 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:37:36 Page: 1 Mapcheck of: 1 Description: Lot 1 Northing Basting Beginning Point 971165.6083 247048.6282 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 000 46' 50" E 182.341 971347.9324 247051.1122 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 890 43' 00" E 29.190 971348.0767 247080.3018 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius It East S 000 17' 00" E 38.500 971309.5772 247080.4922 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 170 11' 06" CW 11.547 5.817 S 810 41' 27" E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 11.504 0.432 0.437 148" 49' 13" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 160 54' 06" E 38.500 971346.4142 247091.6853 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 730 05' 54" E 4.472 971345.1140 247095.9642 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 160 54' 06" E 21.500 971365.6854 247102.2149 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 170 11' 06 "CCW 6.449 3.249 S 810 41' 27" E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 6.424 0.241 0.244 266° 29' 31" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 000 17' 00" E 21.500 971344.1856 247102.3212 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 89" 43' 00" E 13.000 971344.2499 247115.3210 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 000 17' 00" E 29.500 971314.7503 247115.4669 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 420 41' 06n CW 21.977 11.527 S 680 56' 27" E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 21.473 2.023 2.172 1940 13' 23" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 420 24' 06" E 29.500 971336.5341 247135.3595 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 000 17' 00" E 172.121 971164.4152 247136.2106 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 89" 13' 10" W 87.591 971165.6085 247046.6277 Closure: S 70" 05' 22" E 0.000 - 0.0002 N 0.0005 E Perimeter: 52B.689 Feet Closure Ratio: 1080180 Area 15507.49 Square Feet - 0.3560 Acres C IT tl 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 1 OS Description: Lot 1 OSPSM Esmt 0.0010 E Date: 10 -OS -99 Time: 10:31:26 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971164.4151 247136.2106 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89° 13' 10' W 87.591 971165.6083 247048.6277 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 00° 46' SO' E 62.344 971227.9466 247049.4770 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 90° 00' 00' E 20.199 971227.9466 247069.6760 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 82° 13' 58' E 10.241 971226.5625 247079.8231 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 67° 48' 11' E 12.833 971221.7143 247091.7050 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 53° 45' 10' E 8.214 971216.8576 247098.3294 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 61° 35' 08' E 4.519 971214.7073 247102.3040 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 83. 56' 58' E 3.967 971214.2891 247106.2489 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 80. 08' 24' E 4.186 971215.0059 247110.3731 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 57° 04' 19' E 4.451 971217.4254 247114.1090 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 35. 23' 13' E 5.495 971221.9053 247117.2912 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 24° 55' 05' E 7.681 971228.8713 247120.5273 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 14° 43' 52' E 7.650 971236.2698 247122.4726 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 03° 23' 34' E 96.099 971332.2004 247128.1598 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89° 43' 00' E 7.220 971332.2361 247135.3797 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00° 17' 00' E 167.822 971164.4161 247136.2096 Cl oeu re: S 44° 38' 21' E 0.001 - 0.0010 N Perimeter: 510.511 Feet Closure Ratio: 353780 Area: 6239.98 Square Feet • 0.1433 Acres 0.0010 E Date: 10 -OS -99 Time: 10:31:26 Page: 1 User Name: Davey Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 2 Description: Lot 2 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:39:28 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971166.6844 246969.6355 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 00" 46' 50" E 173.418 971340.0863 246971.9979 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 16" 32' 05" E 59.500 971397.1258 246988.9314 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 44° 05' 03 -CCW 45.780 24.090 N 84° 29' 33" E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 44.659 4.349 4.692 96° 17' 44" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 27^ 32' 58" E 59.500 971344.3724 247016.4510 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 27" 32' 58" E 30.500 971317.3307 247030.5577 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 27" 15' 58" CW 14.514 7.397 N 76" 05' 01" E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 14.378 0.859 0.884 187° 51' 18" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 00° 17' 00" W 30.500 971347.8304 247030.4069 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89" 43' 00" E 20.706 971347.9328 247051.1126 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00° 46' 50" W 182.341 971165.6087 247048.6286 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89" 13' 10" W 79.000 971166.6849 246969.6359 Closure: S 41" 08' 43" W 0.001 - 0.0005 N - 0.0004 E Perimeter: 515.760 Feet Closure Ratio: 788355 Area: 13960.53 Square Feet - 0.3205 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:39:28 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Date: 10 -05 -99 Time: 10:31:37 Page: 1 Mapcheck of: 2 -OS Description: Lot 2 OSPSM Esmt Northing Basting Beginning Point 971165.6083 247048.6282 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 89° 13' 10" N 79.000 971166.6845 246969.6355 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 00° 46' SO- B 56.518 971223.1973 246970.4055 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 84° 30' 01" B 21.468 971225.2548 246991.7746 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 89° 21' 14" B 52.661 971224.6609 247044.4323 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 56° 55' 48" B 6.021 971227.9464 247049.4779 Direction Distance Northing Basting S DO- 46' SO- N 62.344 971165.6082 247048.6286 Closure: N 71. 51' 58• N 0.000 0.0001 N - 0.0004 E Perimeter: 278.011 Peet Closure Ratio: 633973 Area: 4637.66 Square Peet - 0.1065 Acres User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:39:33 Page: 1 Mapcheck of: 3 Description: Lot 3 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971178.1673 246774.0003 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 46° O1' 29" B 192.370 971311.7390 246912.4373 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 37° 15' 35" E 55.484 971355.8987 246946.0290 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 46° OV 27" E 59.500 971397.1255 246988.9312 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 29° 36' 22 -CCN 30.745 15.724 S 58° 39' 44° E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 30.404 1.975 2.043 96° 17' 44" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. Bast S 16° 321 05" N 59.500 971340.0860 246971.9977 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00° 46' S0" N 173.418 971166.6841 246969.6352 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89° 13' 10• N 195.000 971169,3406 246774.6533 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 04° 13' 58• N 8.851 971178.1674 246774.0000 Closure: S 66° 56' 06• B 0.000 - 0.0001 N 0.0003 E Perimeter: 655.868 Peet Closure Ratio: 2302263 Area: 20649.44 Square Peet . 0.4740 Acres Veer Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 3 OS Description: Lot 3 OSPSM Esmt 0.0011 E Date: 10 -05 -99 Time: 10:31:45 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971166.6844 246969.6355 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89° 13' 10" N 195.000 971169.3409 246774.6536 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 04° 13' 58" N 8.851 971178.1677 246774.0003 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 46° O1' 29^ E 91.239 971241.5193 246839.6595 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 57° 23' 29" E 8.168 971237.1176 246846.5400 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 71° 38' 19• E 12.043 971233.3239 246857.9699 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 81° 14' 52• E 21.508 971230.0513 246879.2274 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 78° 51' 30• B 14.764 971227.1969 246893.7129 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 75° 31' 41• B 25.936 971220.7154 246918.8259 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 70° 10' 12" E 28.456 971211.D622 246945.5946 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 88° 56' 23" E 7.452 971211.2001 246953.0453 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 72° 54. 23• E 18.066 971216.5103 246970.3133 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00° 46' SO- N 49.830 971166.6849 246969.6344 Closure: S 63° 13' 41° E 0.001 - 0.0005 N Perimeter: 481.314 Feet Closure Ratio: 399690 Area: 10016.51 Square Feet - 0.2299 Acres 0.0011 E Date: 10 -05 -99 Time: 10:31:45 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 4 Description: Lot 4 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:39:39 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971359.4076 246760.5866 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 84° 19' 01• B 139.123 971373.1843 246899.0258 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 82° 08' 22" E 33.941 971377.8262 246932.6479 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 71° 04' 24" E 59.500 971397.1255 246988.9310 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 24° 55' 57 -CCW 25.892 13.154 S 31° 23' 34• E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 25.688 1.403 1.437 96° 17' 44• Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 46° 08' 27" N 59.500 971355.8986 246946.0288 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 37° 15' 35" N 55.484 971311.7389 246912.4372 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 46° 01' 29• N 192.370 971178.1672 246774.0001 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 04. 13' 58" N 181.736 971359.4075 246760.5864 Closure: N 69° 11' 06• B 0.000 0.0001 N 0.0002 E Perimeter: 628.546 Peet Closure Ratio: 3416654 Area: 19490.39 Square Peet - 0.4474 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:39:39 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 4 OS Description: Lot 4 OSPSM Esmt 0.0003 E Date: 10 -05 -99 Time: 10:31:53 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971178.1673 246774.0003 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 04° 13' 58" N 181.736 971359.4076 246760.5866 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 84° 19' 01" E 32.957 971362.6712 246793.3816 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 11° 14' 46" E 20.782 971342.2882 246797.4346 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 14° 21' 58• E 44.560 971299.1216 246808.4907 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 18° 04' 56" E 37.677 971263.3054 246820.1849 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 31° 14' 00" E 14.55D 971250.8642 246827.7295 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 51° 55' 39" E 15.154 971241.5194 246839.6592 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 46° 01' 29• N 91.239 971178.167B 246774.0000 Closure: S 33° 21' 55• E O.DO1 - 0.0005 N Perimeter: 438.655 Feet Closure Ratio: 742266 Area: 7596.26 Square Feet - 0.1744 Acres 0.0003 E Date: 10 -05 -99 Time: 10:31:53 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 5 Description: Lot 5 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:39:46 Page: 1 Northing Basting Beginning Point 971439.2147 246754.6801 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 840 19' 00" E 179.432 971456.9839 246933.2301 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 050 41' 00" E 23.849 971433.2521 246935.5919 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 840 19' 00" W 30.500 971430.2317 246905.2418 Delta Angle Are Length Tangent Chord Direction 270 15' 58" CW 14.514 7.397 S 070 56' 59" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 14.378 0.859 0.884 1870 51. 18" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 680 25' 02" E 30.500 971419.0124 246933.6033 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 680 25' 02" E 59.500 971397.1257 246988.9316 Delta Angle Are Length Tangent Chord Direction 40" 30. 34 "CCW 42.068 21.956 S 010 19. 41" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 41.197 3.679 3.922 960 17. 44" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 71. 04. 24" W 59.500 971377.8264 246932.6485 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 82" 08. 22" W 33.941 971373.1845 246899.0264 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 840 19' 01" W 139.123 971359.4078 246760.5872 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 040 13' 58" W 80.025 971439.2145 246754.6807 Closure: N 720 5B' 10" W 0.001 0.0002 N - 0.0006 B Perimeter: 512.952 Peet Closure Ratio: 821532 Area: 14044.34 Square Feet - 0.3224 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:39:46 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 5 OR Description: Lot 5 OSPSM Esmt Date: 10 -05 -99 Time: 10:32:01 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971359.4076 246760.5866 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 04° 13' 58" W 80.025 971439.2143 246754.6801 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 84° 19' 00" B 30.931 971442.2774 246785.4590 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 05° 40' S9" E 80.000 971362.6706 246793.3811 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 84° 19' 01" W 32.957 971359.4071 246760.5860 Closure: N 46° 00' 31" E 0.001 0.0005 N 0.0006 E Perimeter: 223.913 Feet Closure Ratio: 286294 Area: 2555.51 Square Feet • 0.0587 Acres Date: 10 -05 -99 Time: 10:32:01 Page: 1 User Name: DaysV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 6 Description: Lot 6 0.0005 F Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:39:54 Page: 1 Northing Fasting Beginning Point 971514.2409 246751.2197 Direction Distance Northing Fasting N 84° 19' 00• F 175.445 971531.6153 246925.8023 Direction Distance Northing Fasting S 05° 41' 00• F 75.000 971456.9839 246933.2296 Direction Distance Northing Fasting S 84° 19' 00• N 179.432 971439.2147 246754.6796 Direction Distance Northing Fasting N 04° 13' 58• N 60.655 971499.7043 246750.2027 Direction Distance Northing Fasting N 04° 00. 00• F 14.572 971514.2408 246751.2192 Closure: N 78° 27' 16• F 0.001 0.0001 N Perimeter: 505.104 Peet Closure Ratio: 977020 Area: 13371.16 Square Peet - 0.3070 Acres 0.0005 F Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:39:54 Page: 1 User Name: Davey Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 6 OS Description: Lot 6 OSPSM Esmt - 0.0002 E Date: 10 -05 -99 Time: 10:32:08 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971439.2147 246754.6801 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 04° 13' 58" W 60.655 971499.7043 246750.2032 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 04" 00' 00" E 14.572 971514.2408 246751.2197 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 84° 19' 00" E 24.968 971516.7134 246776.0650 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 09" 48' 03" E 35.307 971491.9216 246782.0751 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 04° 52' 45" E 39.788 971442.2778 246785.4592 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 84° 19' 00• W 30.931 971439.2147 246754.6803 Closure: S 85" 15' 23" W 0.000 - 0.0000 N Perimeter: 206.221 Feet Closure Ratio: 1134386 Area: 2219.76 Square Feet - 0.0510 Acres - 0.0002 E Date: 10 -05 -99 Time: 10:32:08 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 7 Description: Lot 7 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:01 Page: 1 Northing Basting Beginning Point 971612.8341 246742.2185 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 84. 19' 00" B 174.638 971630.1286 246915.9981 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 05° 41' 00" B 79.000 971551.5169 246923.8214 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 84. 19' 00" N 176.500 971534.0380 246748.1890 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 04° 20' 00• N 79.022 971612.8341 246742.2182 Closure: S 81° 28- 42• E 0.000 - 0.0000 N 0.0003 E Perimeter: 509.160 Peet Closure Ratio: 1896510 Area: 13869.96 Square Peet - 0.3184 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:01 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 8 Description: Lot 8 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:09 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971714.2933 246762.2365 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 82° 20' 00• E 154.813 971693.6398 246915.6656 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 82° 20' 00" E 220.500 971664.2229 247134.1946 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 13° 21' 00 -CCW 51.377 25.805 S 00° 59' 30• W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 51.261 1.495 1.505 25° 59' 04" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 84° 19' 00" W 220.500 971642.3868 246914.7785 Direction Distance Northing Seating S 05° 41' 00• E 12.319 971630.1283 246915.9984 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 84° 19' 00" W 174.638 971612.8339 246742.2189 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 04° 20' 00" W 65.943 971678.5883 246737.2363 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 35° 00' 00" E 43.587 971714.2927 246762.2368 Closure: N 23° 59' 59" W 0.001 0.0006 N - 0.0003 E Perimeter: 502.677 Feet Closure Ratio: 798132 Area: 14334.57 Square Peet = 0.3291 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:09 Page: 1 User Name: DaueV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 9 Description: Lot 9 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:15 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971824.7566 246839.5837 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 48' 33' 17' E 122.813 971743.4661 246931.6429 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 4B' 33' 17' E 40.500 971716.6590 246962.0012 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 24' 30' 32'CCW 17.324 8.797 S 29' 11' 27' W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 17.193 0.923 0.944 141° 28' 16' Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 73' 03' 49' W 40.500 971728.4570 246923.2577 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 73' 03' 49' E 220.500 971664.2232 247134.1944 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 09. 16' 11'CCW 35.674 17.876 S 12. 18' 06' W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 35.635 0.721 0.723 25' 59. 04' Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 82' 20' 00' W 220.500 971693.6401 246915.6654 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 82. 20' 00' W 154.813 971714.2936 246762.2363 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 35' 00' 00' E 134.851 971824.7571 246839.5837 Closure: S 03' 58' 17' E 0.000 - 0.0005 N 0.0000 E Perimeter: 465.476 Peet Closure Ratio: 973744 Area: 12099.05 Square Feet - 0.2778 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:15 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 10 Description: Lot 10 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:23 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971892.3374 246955.2559 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 07' 05' 00' E 137.538 971755.8491 246972.2161 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 14' 36' 31' W 40.500 971716.6584 246962.0014 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 63° 09' 48 -CCW 44.648 24.898 S 73° 01' 37' W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 42.421 5.998 7.041 141° 28' 16' Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 48' 33' 17' W 40.500 971743.4656 246931.6431 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 48' 33' 17' W 122.813 971824.7560 246839.5839 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 35° 00' 00' E 52.962 971868.1400 246869.9617 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 56° 08' 15' E 29.155 971884.3852 246894.1713 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 82° 35' 00' E 61.600 971892.3367 246955.2559 Closure: N 02° 33' 50" W 0.001 0.0007 N - 0.0000 E Perimeter: 448.715 Feet Closure Ratio: 687282 Area: 12396.41 Square Feet - 0.2846 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:23 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 11 Description: Lot 11 Northing Fasting Beginning Point 971915.2691 247047.5419 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 02° 00' 00• W 176.000 971739.3763 247041.3996 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 84° 19' 00' W 43.536 971735.0649 246998.0776 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 62° 58' 09• W 40.500 971716.6589 246962.0017 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 48° 21' 38 -CCW 34.184 18.185 N 51° 12' 40" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 33.178 3.553 3.895 141° 2B' 16" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 14° 36' 31" E 40.500 971755.8496 246972.2164 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 07° 05' 00^ W 137.538 971892.3379 246955.2562 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 63° 00' 00• E 51.000 971915.4914 247000.6976 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 89° 43' 43^ E 46.845 971915.2695 247047.5420 Closure: S 18° 46' 55" W 0.000 - 0.0004 N - 0.0001 E Perimeter: 489.103 Feet Closure Ratio: 1144665 Area: 13601.46 Square Feet - 0.3122 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:29 Page: 1 User Name: Davey Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 12 Description: Lot 12 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:35 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971895.4311 247207.9963 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 17° 55' 00" w 162.753 971740.5708 247157.9280 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 72° 05' 00" E 591.000 971558.7595 247720.2675 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chard Direction 02. 09' 48 -CCW 22.315 11.159 S 16' 50' 06' W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 22.313 0.105 0.105 09' 41' 41' Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 74° 14. 48" W 591.000 971719.2139 247151.4658 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 74° 14. 48' W 30.000 971727.3588 247122.5926 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 84° 19' 00' W 120.704 971715.4054 247002.4819 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 88° 13' 31' W 40.500 971716.6597 246962.0013 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 20" 4B' 20 "CCW 20.361 10.401 N 12' 37' 41' W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 20.148 1.273 1.314 141° 28' 16' Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 62° 58' 09" E 40.500 971735.0657 246998.0772 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 84° 19' 00' E 43.536 971739.3771 247041.3992 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 02° 00' 00' E 176.000 971915.2699 247047.5415 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 89" 43' 43' E 82.455 971914.8793 247129.9956 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 76° 00' 00' E 80.388 971895.4317 247207.9957 Closure: S 44° 06' 46' E 0.001 - 0.0006 N 0.0006 E Perimeter: 738.513 Peet Closure Ratio: 872834 Area: 26658.85 Square Feet + 0.6120 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:35 Page: 1 0 " User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 13 Description: Lot 13 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:43 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971648.3060 247136.0909 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 84° 19' 00' W 171.811 971631.2915 246965.1245 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 05' 41' 00" W 16.027 971647.2397 246963.5373 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 84' 19. 00' E 171.500 971664.2234 247134.1943 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 00" 43' 40' CW 2.178 1.089 N 05' 19' 10' W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 2.178 0.003 0.003 33' 24' 31' Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 85' 02' 40' W 171.500 971649.4087 246963.3353 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 85° 02' 40' E 20.500 971651.1796 246983.7587 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 60' 16' 22' CW 21.565 11.901 N 25" 10' 53" E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 20.584 2.771 3.204 279° 29' 30' Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 34' 40' 58" W 20.500 971668.0371 246972.0935 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 34' 40' 58" W 8.000 971674.6156 246967.5413 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 73. 41' 52 -CCW 10.290 5.995 N 18° 28' 06' E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 9.595 1.598 1.997 356° 11. 50' Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 71' 37' 10' E 8.000 971677.1382 246975.1331 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 18' 22' SO' W 1.146 971678.2257 246974.7718 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 18° 22' 50' W 40.500 971716.6595 246962.0010 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 69' SO' 41'CCW 49.370 28.277 N 36° 41' 49' E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 46.370 7.293 8.895 141° 28' 16" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 88' 13' 31' E 40.500 971715.4053 247002.4816 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 84° 19' 00' E 120.704 971727.3586 247122.5923 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 74' 14' 48' E 30.000 971719.2137 247151.4655 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 74. 14' 48' E 591.000 971558.7593 247720.2672 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:43 Page: 1 I - User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:43 Page: 2 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 07° 02' 19 -CCW 72.603 36.347 S 12° 14' 02" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 72.557 1.115 1.117 09° 41' 41" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N R1° 17' 07" W 591.000 971648.3046 247136.0903 Closure: N 23° 30' 42" E 0.002 0.0014 N 0.0006 E Perimeter: 495.691 Feet Closure Ratio: 319144 Area: 13108.65 Square Feet - 0.3009 Acres User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 14 Description: Lot 14 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:49 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971567.237B 247129.3285 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 84° 19' 00" W 157.053 971551.6B4B 246973.0475 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 05" 41' 00" W 80.000 971631.2915 246965.1251 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 84" 19' 00" E 171.811 971648.3060 247136.0915 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 81° 17' 07" E 591.000 971558.7608 247720.2684 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 07" 53' 34•CCW 81.413 40.771 S 04" 46' 06" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 81.349 1.401 1.405 09" 41' 41" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N B9° 10' 41" W 591.000 971567.2380 247129.3292 Closure: S 37" 23' 48" W 0.001 - 0.0010 N - 0.0007 E Perimeter: 490.278 Feet Closure Ratio: 401354 Area: 13078.55 Square Feet - 0.3002 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:49 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 15 Description: Lot 15 0.0002 E Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:57 Page: 1 Northing Basting Beginning Point 971487.8757 247129.6110 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 84° 19' 00" W 149.475 971473.0731 246980.8708 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 05° 41' 00' W 79.000 971551.6848 246973.0474 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 84° 19' 00' E 157.053 971567.2378 247129.3284 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 89° 10' 41' E 591.000 971558.7598 247720.2675 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction O1° 06' 19 -CCW 11.401 5.701 S 00° 16' 09' W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 11.401 0.027 0.027 09° 41' 41" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 89° 43' 00" W 591.000 971555.8373 247129.2748 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 00° 17' 00' E 67.962 971487.8761 247129.6108 Closure: S 19° 30' 36' E 0.000 - 0.0004 N Perimeter: 464.892 Feet Closure Ratio: 1021085 Area: 12103.93 Square Feet - 0.2779 Acres 0.0002 E Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:40:57 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 16 Description: Lot 16 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:41:02 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971487.8757 247129.6110 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00" 17' 00" E 65.053 971422.8235 247129.9327 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 34" 37' 09" W 26.215 971401.2500 247115.0395 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 89" 43' 00" W 13.000 971401.1857 247102.0396 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 00" 17' 00" E 29.500 971371.6860 247102.1855 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 17" 11' 06 "CCW 8.848 4.458 S 81" 07' 27" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc B.B15 0.331 0.335 194° 13' 23" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 17" 28' 06" W 29.500 971399.8256 247093.3302 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 72" 31' 54" W 4.472 971398.4832 247089.0645 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 17" 28' 06" W 30.500 971427.5766 247079.9090 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 17" 11' 06" CW 9.148 4.609 S 81" 07' 27" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 9.114 0.342 0.346 187° 51' 18" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 00" 17' 00" E 30.500 971397.0770 247080.0598 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 89" 43' 00" W 72.928 971396.7164 247007.1327 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 00" 17' 00" W 20.500 971417.2161 247007.0313 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 84" 36' 00" CW 30.269 18.654 N 47" 59' 00" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 27.594 5.338 7.217 279° 29' 30" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 84" 19' 00" W 20.500 971415.1860 246986.6321 Direction Distance Northing Pasting N 05" 41' DO" W 58.174 971473.0740 246980.8711 Direction Distance Northing Fasting N 84" 19' 00" E 149.475 971487.8766 247129.6114 Closure: S 23" 08. 07" W 0.001 - 0.0009 N - 0.0004 E Perimeter: 437.583 Feet Closure Ratio: 460864 Area: 11763.05 Square Feet - 0.2700 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:41:02 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mess Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 17 Description: Lot 17 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:22:30 Page: 1 Northing Basting Beginning Point 972122.4512 245911.3254 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 79" 20' 55" E 592.874 972012.8686 246493.9842 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 36° 02' 35" 6 413.419 971678.5883 246737.2370 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 04° 20' 00" E 144.965 971534.0377 246748.1904 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 84° 19' 00" E 176.500 971551.5165 246923.8228 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 05" 41' 00" S 20.000 971531.6149 246925.8034 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 84° 19' 00" N 175.445 971514.2405 246751.2208 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 04° 00' 00` N 14.572 971499.7040 246750.2043 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89" 13' 10" N 435.006 971505.6300 246315.2387 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00° 43' 12" N 330.000 971175.6561 246311.0919 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89° 13' 10" N 330.000 971180.1516 245981.1225 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 00° 43' 12" E 330.000 971510.1255 245985.2693 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 06° 53' 08" N 616.774 972122.4511 245911.3264 Closure: N 85° 34' 56• N 0.001 0.0001 N - 0.0010 E Perimeter: 3579.555 Peet Closure Ratio: 3517056 Area: 501354.77 Square Peet - 11.5095 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:22:30 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Date: 10 -05 -99 Time: 09:15:27 Page: 1 Mapcheck of: 17 -N Description: LOT 17 Net Northing Basting Beginning Point 972122.4512 245911.3254 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 79° 20' 55" E 592.874 972012.8686 246493.9842 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 36° 02' 35• E 413.419 971678.5883 246737.2370 Direction Distance Northing casting S 04° 20' 00• E 144.965 971534.0377 246748.1904 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 08° 42' 10` E 20.028 971514.2403 246751.2208 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 04° 00' 00• W 14.572 971499.7038 246750.2043 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 89° 13' 10" W 435.006 971505.6298 246315.2387 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 00° 43' 12" W 330.000 971175.6559 246311.0919 Direction Distance Northing Eaeting N 89° 13' 10" W 330.000 971180.1514 245981.1225 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 00° 43' 12" E 330.000 971510.1253 245985.2693 Direction Distance Northing Eaeting N 06° 53' 08^ W 616.774 972122.4509 245911.3264 Closure: N 74° 40' S0" W 0.001 0.0003 N - 0.0010 E Perimeter: 3227.638 Feet Closure Ratio: 3093500 Area: 497835.32 Square Feet - 11.4287 Acres Y User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 18 Description: Lot 18 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:22:08 Page: I Northing Basting Beginning Point 971401.2496 247115.0392 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00" 17' 00" E 57.000 971344.2503 247115.3211 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 89" 43' 00" W 13.000 971344.1860 247102.3212 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 00" 17' 00" W 21.500 971365.6857 247102.2149 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 17" 11' 06" CW 6.449 3.249 N 81" 41' 27" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 6.424 0.241 0.244 266° 29' 31" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 16" 54' 06" W 21.500 971345.1144 247095.9642 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 73" 05' 54" W 4.472 971346.4146 247091.6854 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius It North Radius Pt East S 16" 54' 06" W 38.500 971309.5776 247080.4923 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 17" 11' 06-CM 11.547 5.817 N 81" 41' 27" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 11.504 0.432 0.437 148° 49' 13" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 00" 17' 00" W 38.500 971348.0771 247080.3019 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 89" 43' 00" W 49.896 971347.8304 247030.4065 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 00" 17' 00" E 30.500 971317.3307 247030.5573 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 27" 15' S8 "CCW 14.514 7.397 S 76" OS' 01" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 14.378 0.859 0.884 187" 51' 18" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 27" 32' 58" W 30.500 971344.3724 247016.4507 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 27" 32' 58" W 59.500 971397.1258 246988.9311 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 139" 07' 56" CW 144.485 159.701 N 47" 59' OD" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 111.512 38.727 110.925 96" 17' 44" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 68" 25' 02" W 59.500 971419.0126 246933.6028 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 68" 25' 02" W 30.500 971430.2319 246905.2412 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 27" 15' 58 "CCW 14.514 7.397 N 07" 56' 59" E Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:22:08 Page: I User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Date: 09 -27 -99 Time 15:22:08 Page: 2 Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 14.378 0.859 0.884 187° 51' 18" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 84° 19' 00" E 30.500 971433.2523 246935.5913 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 05" 41' 00" W 210.168 971642.3872 246914.7783 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 84° 19' 00" E 220.500 971664.2234 247134.1944 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 22" 37' 11" CW 87.051 44.100 N 05° 37' 35" E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 86.487 4.282 4.367 25" 59' 04" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 73" 03' 49" W 220.500 971728.4572 246923.2578 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 73" 03' 49" E 40.500 971716.6592 246962.0012 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 234° 40' 59" CW 165.888 20.941 S 45° 43' 19" E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 71.951 - 59.101 - 128.679 141° 28' 16" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 18" 22' 50" E 40.500 971678.2253 246974.7720 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 18" 22' 50" E 1.146 971677.1378 246975.1334 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 71° 37' 10" W 8.000 971674.6152 246967.5415 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 73" 41' 52" CW 10.290 5.995 S 18° 28' 06" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 9.595 1.598 1.997 356° 11' SO" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 34" 40' SV E 8.000 971668.0367 246972.0937 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 34° 40' 5B" E 20.500 971651.1792 246983.7589 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 60" 16' 22-CON 21.565 11.901 S 25" 10' 51" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 20.584 2.771 3.204 279° 29' 30" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 85° 02' 40" W 20.500 971649.4084 246963.3355 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 85" 02' 40" E 171.500 971664.2230 247134.1945 Delta Angle Are Length Tangent Chord Direction 00" 43' 40 "CCW 2.178 1.089 S 05" 19' 10" E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 2.178 0.003 0.003 33" 24' 31" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 84" 19' 00" W 171.500 971647.2393 246963.5375 n S Ue er Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Direction Distance Northing Easting 5 05° 41. 00" E 233.200 971415.1857 246986.6314 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 84° 19' 00" E 20.500 971417.2158 247007.0306 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 84° 36' 00 -CCW 30.269 18.654 S 47' 59' 00" E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 27.594 5.338 7.217 279° 29' 30" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 00° 17' 00" E 20.500 971396.7160 247007.1320 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89° 43' 00" E 72.928 971397.0767 247080.0591 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 00° 17' 00" W 30.500 971427.5763 247079.9083 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 17° 11' 06 -CCW 9.148 4.609 N 81° 07' 27" E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 9.114 0.342 0.346 187° 51' 18" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 17° 28' 06" E 30.5D0 971398.4829 247089.0637 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 72° 31' 54" E 4.472 971399.8253 247093.3295 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 17° 28' 06" E 29.5D0 971371.6857 247102.1847 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 17° 11' 06" CW 8.848 4.458 N 81° 07' 27^ E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 8.815 0.331 0.335 194° 13' 23' Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 00° 17' 00• W 29.500 971401.1853 247102.0389 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89° 43' 00" E 13.000 971401.2496 247115.0307 Closure: S BS- 50' 58" E 0.001 - 0.0000 N 0.0005 E Perimeter: 1186.029 Feet Closure Ratio: 2347355 Area: 29244.15 Square Feet - 0.6714 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:22:08 Page: 3 .� . User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 19 Description: Lot 19 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:22:23 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 972012.8696 246493.9839 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 84° 18' 13- E 737.219 971939.6954 247227.5624 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 17^ 55' 00" N 210.890 971739.0325 247162.6856 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 72° 05' 00" E 586.000 971558.7594 247720.2675 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 18° 12' 00 -CCW 186.143 93.862 S 08° 49' 00" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 185.361 7.376 7.470 09° 46' 39• Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 89° 43' 00" W 586.000 971555.8616 247134.2746 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00° 17' 00" E 140.905 971414.9583 247134.9714 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 68° 45' 16• W 21.500 971422.7491 247114.9327 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 68° 28' 16" CW 25.693 14.631 S 55° 28' 52• W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 24.192 3.725 4.506 266° 29' 31• Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 00° 17' 00• E 21.500 971401.2494 247115.0390 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 34° 37' 09" E 26.215 971422.8229 247129.9322 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 00° 17' 00• N 133.015 971555.8363 247129.2744 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 89° 43' 00• E 591.000 971558.7589 247720.2672 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 18° 12' 00• CN 187.731 94.663 N 08° 49' 00• E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 186.943 7.438 7.533 09. 41' 41" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 72° 05' 00• W 591.000 971740.5702 247157.9278 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 17° 55' 00" E 162.753 971895.4305 247207.9961 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 76° 00' 00" N 60.386 971914.6761 247129.9959 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89° 43' 43• N 129.300 971915.4905 247000.6974 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 63° 00' 00• N 51.000 971892.3370 246955.2560 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 82° 35' 00• N 61.600 971884.3855 246894.1714 Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:22:23 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:22:23 Page: 2 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 56° 08' 15" N 29.155 971B68.1402 246869.9618 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 35° 00' 00" N 231.400 971678.5BB5 246737.2362 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 36° 02' 35" N 413.419 972012.8688 246493.9833 Closure: N 34° 38' 59' E 0.001 0.0008 N 0.0006 E Perimeter: 2806.828 Peet Closure Ratio: 2722083 Area: 87095.00 Square Peet - 1.9994 Acres Date: 09 -27 -99 Time: 15:22:23 Page: 2 User Name: DawV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: 19 SD Description: Lot 19 SD Esmt - 0.0002 E Date: 10 -05 -99 Time: 10:38:10 Page: 1 Northing Basting Beginning Point 971892.3314 246955.2559 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 82° 35' 00" N 10.000 971891.0466 246945.3396 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 07° 05' 00• N 52.639 971943.2838 246938.8485 Direction Distance Northing Basting N 82° 55' 00" E 10.000 971944.5169 246948.7722 Direction Distance Northing Basting S 07° 05' 00• E 52.581 971892.3372 246955.2561 Closure: N 50° 44' SO- N 0.000 0.0002 N Perimeter: 125.220 Feet Closure Ratio: 510871 Area: 526.10 Square Feet - 0.0121 Acres - 0.0002 E Date: 10 -05 -99 Time: 10:38:10 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: Mapcheck N Mesa Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: Road Ded Description: Road Dedication a ent 0.0000 E Date: 09 -27 -99 Time 15:22:16 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 971414.9584 247134.9716 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00° 17' 00" E 78.425 971336.5344 247135.3594 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East S 42° 24' 06" W 29.500 971314.7505 247115.4669 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 42° 41' 06 "CCW 21.977 11.527 N 68" 56' 27" W Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 21.473 2.023 2.172 194° 13' 23" Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East N 00" 17' 00• W 29.500 971344.2501 247115.3210 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 00° 17' 00" W 57.000 971401.2494 247115.0391 Radial Dir. In Radius Radius Pt North Radius Pt East N 00° 17' 00" W 21.500 971422.7492 247114.9328 Delta Angle Arc Length Tangent Chord Direction 68° 28' 16 "CCW 25.693 14.631 N 55" 28' 52" E Chord Length Middle Ordinate External D.O.C. Arc 24.192 3.725 4.506 266° 29' 31^ Radial Dir. Out Radius P.T. North P.T. East S 68° 45' 16" E 21.500 971414.9583 247134.9716 Closure: N 21° 35' 21" E 0.000 0.0001 N Perimeter: 183.096 Feet Closure Ratio: 2156295 Area: 1263.88 Square Feet . 0.0290 Acres 0.0000 E Date: 09 -27 -99 Time 15:22:16 Page: 1 I User Name: DaveV Project: 65M N MESA MAP Sht 6 Map Check Report Map Check Report Mapcheck of: OS -N Description: OPEN SPACE NORTH Date: 06 -09 -99 Time: 18:53:50 Page: 1 Northing Easting Beginning Point 972122.4512 245911.3254 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 79" 20' 55" E 592.874 972012.8686 246493.9842 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 360 02' 35" E 359.000 971722.5901 246705.2173 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 54° 00' 00• W 24.000 971708.4833 246685.8009 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 870 00' 00" W 165.000 971717.1187 246521.0270 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 27" 00' 00" W 23.000 971737.6119 246510.5852 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 32" 32' 27" E 49.378 971779.2379 246537.1456 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 890 05' Soo W 349.000 971773.7392 246188.1690 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 62° 55' 22" W 109.000 971823.3550 246091.1360 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 85" DO' DO" W 68.000 971829.2816 246023.3948 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 890 00' Do- W 76.840 971830.6226 245946.5665 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 06" 53' 08" W 293.947 972122.4496 245911.3262 Closure: N 26" 20' 10" W 0.002 0.0016 N - 0.0008 E Perimeter: 2110.040 Feet Closure Ratio: 1151814 Area: 183963.12 Square Feet . 4.2232 Acres Date: 06 -09 -99 Time: 18:53:50 Page: 1 User Name: DaveV Project: 65M N MESA MAP Sht 6 Map Check Report Map Check Report Date: 06 -09 -99 Time: LB:53:59 Page: 1 Mapcheck oi: OSS Description: OPEN SPACE SOUTH Northing Easting Beginning Point 971505.6301 246315.2377 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 00" 43' 12" W 330.000 971175.6562 246311.0909 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 89" 13' 10" W 330.000 971180.1517 245981.1215 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 00" 43' 12" E 243.746 971423.8784 245984.1845 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 83" 00' 00" E 56.805 971416.9557 246040.5660 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 80° 00' 00" E 40.000 971410.0097 246079.9583 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 24° 00' 00' E 69.000 971346.9751 246108.0232 Direction Distance Northing Easting S 32° 00' 00" E 53.000 971302.0285 246136.1089 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 39" 00' 00" E 62.000 971350.2116 246175.1268 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 01° 30' 00• E 104.000 971454.1760 246177.8492 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 35° 00' 00" E 60.000 971503.3251 246212.2637 Direction Distance Northing Easting N 88" 43' 03" E 103.000 971505.6304 246315.2379 Closure: S 37° 02' 17" W 0.000 - 0.0003 N - 0.0002 E Perimeter: 1451.551 Feet Closure Ratio: 3559934 Area: 82781.23 Square Feet - 1.9004 Acres ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City Of Capital Improvement Projects Encinitas District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering March 2, 2004 Attn: The American Insurance Company C/o Rohm Insurance Agency 26 Plaza Square Suite 200 Orange, California 92866 RE: Barratt America- North Mesa Lower Quail Ridge II TM 98 -171 Grading Permit 6038 -G APN 254 - 611 - (06,09,10) Final release of security Permit 6038 -G authorized earthwork, storm drainage, and erosion control, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the grading and the one -year warranty inspection. Therefore, release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 111 3351 2506, in the remaining amount of $102,766.00, is hereby fully exonerated. The original amount of the bond was $411,064.00. The document original is enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, el 6/;, 4;20� Masi h Maher Senior Civil Engineer y Lembach Finance Manager Financial Services Cc: Jay Lembach, FinanceManager Barran America Debra Geishart File enc. TE17tw,4,33 -INX) FAX 7iw- 633.2627 SUi 6. %ulcan A%unLiu F.ncinilas. Cali@,mia 92024 -3633 nrD'6u- 633• "iai ✓4 recycled paper WGINEEKING SERVICES DE1 TMENT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capllal hnprovement Prc Dishict support 5er Feld Operc subdivision Engine traffic Engine. FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ S upport Services (D) ❑ Office of the Director (M 1) Field Operations (FO) ❑ T _ O ATTENTION: i - DATE: Regarding (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE TPMfM P/MIN/DR: (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number _nom DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmittedasfog lowl� wr Other Application: Final Parcel Mainal Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Ap Copy / Origins / Certificate Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Ca c s Reference Maps ❑ CommenWAdditional Space for Document: Interoffice Memorandum* O Plancheck Comments* ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail O Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park p Impact Fees ❑ • (Staff/ Consultant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Sketch (if needed): _ Agreement re: n Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Potaint. ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Check CheckprinVApproved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments* ❑ ( ic/Private) �ytj oa ag ate,/ w,,eer/r rat ark/Facility) - -- Inte ediat�tioll: Grading Plan ❑ Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments* ❑ Plan Change Description: Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ (Mass/Roug)i/Preliminary/Precise) Hydrology Study/Map ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... orr n nt ❑ Signature E] Information ❑ Uses ID C�om Please return Please call: if necessary Originator: Copies to: V Messenger Mail El Facsimile El Other E] I Received y: Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633.2770/FAX (760) 633.2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISGhARR/Gencric Trans doc /02 11 99 1 of 1 MHUNSAKHR &ASSOCIATES 5 A N D I E G O. I N C PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING 3 f z l 0 2 C 'Z IRVINE LASVEGAS RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO To LTA of Date ENCoI,.ir�v.) APT • Project rvoQ h t N1ES/+ MAP ^L�' 1 O�j7 SUS �JJt..L.a^J /LV Gt4 C.I NJ 1T.P. S I CA.' Attn. I`G�a� q C- etkr o^S TRANSMITTAL LETTER We are forwarding Messen y Messenger er W.O. No. zaA- - t3s By Mail J Your Pick Up No. Copies Description l Mo..��.nw t3cG JA exo- 1—Jayxr%a^a ix--T ter'R E Cup. e� 4,L Zer Qe 4�--- )e--P> eT> t Ue'rUf>«+IED ¢ tat'A o lF Cci2Q- E'�T'f O /V 2 JMAp IQ'% V�O$7 I t F-IEt -0 �c✓nSE G.eT N�c� 1 9 O GHEZIL RECS ^tLO.�J(. SEE t2eL 1 apT r-.ni- G 1 Comments E A9/14 :W-5 ol? THE AFFE�T>El� >>,1aTZS �-JEa -E o .•J Z 41E twQI7t.a t% LcS Tt'4�C— --,c-%M of t't+1S . 0,a.r%,^i L, THE %S AGCI&P -t^SLC- To TNfc 4..•+iT�i Qc,�ROct1 T 6%AO ]v-' S DAVE HAMMAR This material is forwarded for JACK HILL LEX WILLIMAN U Your Files J Per Your Request J Approval 10179 Huennekens St. J Checking J Your Review Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 U Other 161 91 5 58-05 00 PH 161 91 5 58-1414 F X IniO@Htln5ake(SDxofn By RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Dana M. Seguin Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, CA 92121 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Encinitas City Clerk 5050 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION (Pursuant to Section 66469 of the Subdivision Map Act or Section 8770.5 of the Land Surveyor's Act as they may be amended.) NOTICE IS GIVEN that Tract No. 98 -171, Map No. 14057 in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego. State of California, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said county, October 19, 2000, is in error and is corrected in accordance with Section 8770.5 of the Land Surveyors Act or Section 66469 of the Subdivision Map Act as follows: LIST OF CORRECTIONS SHEET 4 OF 6 SHEETS • Set a 2" x 24" iron pipe with disc stamped "L.S. 6215" at the northeast subdivision boundary corner on the centerline of Quail Gardens Drive. • Found a lead and disc stamped "RCE 23956" at a 9.45 -foot offset in the curb measured at right angles to the westerly right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive in lieu of a lead and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" to be set at an offset of 9.75 feet at the most northeasterly corner of Lot 19 on the northerly subdivision boundary and the right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. • Found a lead and disc stamped "RCE 23956" at a 9.75 -foot offset in the curb in lieu of a lead and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" to be set at the southerly terminus of Curve Delta 18 °12'00 ", radius 586.00 and length 186 14 feet on the westerly right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. • Unless otherwise listed set a nail and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" on top of wall or pilaster at all rear lot corners in lieu of a 1/2" x 18" rebar with aluminum cap as shown on Sheet 4. • Set a 1/2" x 18" rebar and aluminum cap marked "L.S. 6215" per record at the southwesterly corner of Lot 7. • Set a 1/2" x 18" rebar and aluminum cap marked "L.S. 6215" at a 2.00 -foot offset in lieu of a 1/2" x 18" rebar and aluminum cap set at the actual location at the following locations: • At the rear corner common to Lot 8, Lot 17 and Lot 19 being the northerly terminus of course bearing North 04 020'00" West, 144.96 feet. Said 2.00 -foot offset bears westerly at right angles to said course. Page 1 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION CITY OF ENCINITAS • At the backline angle point in Lot 10 being the northeasterly terminus of course bearing North 56 008'15" East, 29.16 feet. Said 2.00 -foot offset bears northwesterly at right angles to said course. • At the back line angle point in Lot 11 being the northeasterly terminus of course bearing North 63 000'00" East, 51.00 feet. Said 2.00 -foot offset bears northwesterly at right angles to said course. SHEET 5 OF 6 SHEETS ♦ Set a nail and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" on top of a pilaster in lieu of a 1/2" x 18" rebar with aluminum cap at the following locations: • At the rear corner common to Lots 14 and 15. • At the point of curviture on the rear line of Lot 15 being the northerly terminus of course bearing North 00 017'00" West, 133.01 feet. • At the rear corner common to Lots 15 and 16. ♦ Set a lead and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" in the curb at a 9.65 -foot offset in lieu of a 9.75 -foot offset at the southeast corner of Lot 1 along the westerly right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. • Set a 2" x 24" iron pipe with disc stamped "L.S. 6215" at the most easterly southeasterly subdivision boundary corner on the centerline of Quail Gardens Drive. ♦ The northerly curve return at Quail Gardens Drive and Lauren Court shown as Curve Data C3 at the northeasterly terminus was set at a 8.65 -foot offset in the curb measured on a radial line South 68 045'16" East in lieu of a 9.75 -foot offset at right angles to the right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. ♦ The southerly curve return at Quail Gardens Drive and Lauren Court shown as Curve Data C4 at the southeasterly terminus was set at a 0.50 -foot offset in the curb measured on a radial line North 42 024'06" East, in lieu of a 9.75 -foot offset at right angles to the right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. Page 2 of 3 t CERTIFICATE OF CORRE(,1 ION CITY OF ENCINITAS CERTIFICATE OF ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR I certify that the following are the names of all the present fee owners of real property affected by such corrections: No. Owner Address 1 Barratt American Inc. 1466 Lauren Ct. 2 Bianchi 1996 Trust 1451 Lauren Ct. 3 Bianchi Christopher J. Jr. & Jennifer M. 1454 Lauren Ct. 4 Dorf Arthur & J 1999 Trust Lauren Ct. 5 Fletcher Richard B. 1428 Lauren Ct. 6 Harmet Jeffrey 1460 Lauren Ct. 7 Nunez Luis A. & M A 1994 Trust Lauren Ct. 8 PE III Properties LLC 1440 -44 Lauren Ct. 9 1 Pike Stephen H. Lauren Ct. 10 Ritz Robert F. & Karen M. 1459 Lauren Ct. I further certify that the above Certificate of Correction was prepared by or under the direction and control of the undersigned registered civil engineer or licensed surveyor. SAND Z .0 Dana Michael Seguin L.S. 6215 Exp. 3/31 02 Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. SG smm m =] %135u 2 do I, City Engineer of the City of Encinitas, State of California, certify that I have examined the foregoing Certificate of Correction and find that the only changes shown hereon are changes provided for by Section 66469 of the Subdi,,ision Map Act. Leroy C. Bodas % R.C.E. 22312 p. 9/30/05 (\ City Engineer ri AA [ or ] Deputy _ RCE or LS DATE: Page 3 of 3 Print Name, Title Exp ._-. JGINEERING SER VICES DEPAR TMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (41) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: 068(316 f/Sd4QT ACGti 3 DATE: IZ Z3 AS Regarding (Finance Number TPM TM UP/IR: 9 ;,__j DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE "_Qq(�g -g ! — /L(ESA yp�lq�pl" (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: 2,S¢ - 4// 07 Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papeis ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter" ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ • ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/T /CATV) Sketch (if needed) / Description: Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected E] Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage !Water /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) Grading Plan /.55" SubmittaVPlan Chang As -buil Proposed Corrected [J Approved E] cc • ❑ Blueline/Red- lined ©— Checkprint Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Controb'Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submitt al Re irements Q/ Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review E7 Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG /ARR/Inua_Trans.doc /02.11.99 I or I 6 H U N SA K E R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: January 22, 2003 TO: City of Encinitas Engineer Department FROM: Diane Ingram for Ray Martin PROJECT: North Mesa Lower - 1" PC "As- Built' Grading & Improvement Plan W.O.a: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: E Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up ❑ Mail THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request 0 Approval ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 2 Redlines "As- Built' Grading & Improvement Plan Dwg. 6038 -G shts 1 -9 2 Redlines "As- Built' Precise Grading COMMENTS: ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Clt O Capital Improvement Projects v ,f District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering January 23, 2003 Attn: The American Insurance Company C/o Rohm Insurance Agency 26 Plaza Square Suite 200 Orange, California 92866 RE: Barratt America- North Mesa Lower Quail Ridge II TM 98 -171 6038 -G Grading Permit A.P.N. 254-611-(06,09,10) Partial release of security Permit 6038 -G authorized earthwork, storm drainage, and erosion control, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the grading. Therefore, release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 111 3351 2506, in the amount of $411,064.00, can hereby be reduced by 75% to a remaining amount of $102,766.00. The document original will be kept until such time it is fully exonerated. The remainder will be released after the one -year warranty period and upon final inspection. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, Masi h Maher Senior Civil Engineer Financial Services Cc: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Barratt America file enc. TEL 760- 6332600 / FAX 760-633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 - 633-2700 recycled Paper L.,GINEERINGSERVICES PAR7,i,.NT TRANSMITTAL FORM i Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE))—!9- Traffic Engineering (TE) E] Distri Support Services D ❑ Office of the Director (NI) Field Operations (FO) ❑ T C ' O ATTENTION: DATE. Regarding (Finance Number 40& - OTl DEPO T/FEE TP M/ /MIN /DR: (Finance Number DEPO (Finance Number —� DEPOSIT/FEE APN: — % — Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Comments/Additional Space for Document: Interoffice Memorandum" ❑ Plancheck Comments* 11 Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ "(Staff /Consultant1CD1Fire /SDWD MWD/LCWD) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ p Assessments ❑ Sketch (if needed): Agreement re: I-1 Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ n (Public/Private) Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments' ❑ (Road/ Drainage / Water /Sewer/frail/Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: _ ------- ____ _ -__ _ —_ .------- _-- ____ -- -- ading PI Check Plan Change Description: heckprin proved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments' ❑ (Mass /Rough/Preliminary/Precise) (Erosi n Control/Planting & Irrigation) Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Hydrology Study/Map ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ As Per... Qur conve ation My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For youefi�i C mment Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses C-1 Please return / l lease call: if necessary Originator: Copies to: V Messenge Mail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ I Received b Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770 1FAX (760) 633 -28181 TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /AMGeneric Trans.doc /02.11.99 I of I . ;INEERING SERVICES DEPAR2. NT TRANSMITTAL FORM copilot mwovement Projects Districl Support Services Feld Operations Subdvision Engireering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ Distri Support Services D ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T C O ATTENTION: DATE -,, Regarding (Finance Number " - C7J DEPO T/FEE TP /MIN/DR: " (Finance Number ) DEPO (Finance Number _) DEPOSITIFEE APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Interoffice Memorandum' ❑ Plancheck Comments' ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ Comments/Additional Space for Document: So Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ • (Staff/Consultant/CD/Fire/SDWD MWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): Agreement re: n Improvements ❑ Pvt Rd. Maint. ❑ I� (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/Trail/Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments` ❑ ading PI Check eckprin proved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments* ❑ Plan Change Description: (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) I (Erosi n Conrol/Planting & Irrigation) Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Hydrology Study/Map ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ As Per... /p�,,�`�� c,o,ne ation My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review Our Inquiry p Our Approval[E] For yout C mment Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return / l lease call: if necessary Originator: Copies to: V Messenge Mail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ 1 Received b Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/Generic Trans.doe/02.11.99 t of I ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City Of Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering September 18, 2002 Attn: The American Insurance Company C/o Robin Insurance Company 26 Plaza Square Suite 200 Orange, California 92866 RE: Barratt America- North Mesa Lower Quail Ridge II TM 98 -171 6038 -G Grading Permit A.P.N. 254 -611- (06,09,10) Monumentation Bond Final release of security The final monuments have been set, therefore, release of the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond 111 3351 2514, in the amount of $4,000.00, is hereby fully exonerated. The document original is enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, .l 'M Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Cc: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Barratt America file enc. ?Jay Lembach Finance Manager Financial Services TEL - fill -n;; 30n11 FAX -Poi- 615 -20r Cni ti V "ulr.m 9cenue_ hl, mit.i UI,torm.i 92011-1033 TOO - All -W -2 -1X1 recycled paper TRANSMITTAL FORM JGINEERING SERVICES DEP? $1ENT Capdal bnprovement Pr Dis tact Support se Feld Opers Subdivision Engine Traffic Engine FFFIROM: pital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) � Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ strict upport Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (kl) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: DATE: Regarding (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE TP P/MIN : (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number _� DEPOS[T/FEE APN: / Transmitted as following: 1 Final Parcel Map E] p Final Ma k Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original Certitic / Rejected Preliminary Title Report L] Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Interoffice Memorandum' ❑ Plancheck Comments` ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: n Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ n Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original[Rejected Plancheck Comments• ❑ Grading Plan ❑ Check CheckprinVApproved CopyiOriginal(Rejected Plancheck Comments' ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Hydrology Study/Map ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ T As Per... For your... Please return Originator: _ v I A Received Title: Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • (Staff/Consultant/CD /Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): `�U/J7E�T /?7, (Public/Private) (Road(Drainage/W ater /Sew er/frai VPark/Faci I i ty) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: (Mass/Rough/Prel im inary/Prec ise) (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ I Correction ❑ Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses El Please call: if necessary Copies to. Mail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ Date: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG /ARR/Genenc mans doci02 11 99 1 of I PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING IRVINE LAS VEGAS RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO TRANSMITTAL LETTER A0 HUN SAKE R &ASSOCIATES 5 A N D I E G D. 1 N C IN DAVE HAMMAR IACK HILL LEX WILLIMAN 10179 Huennekens 51. Suite 100 San Dwgn. CA 92121 (6:9) 558-4500 PH 16191 558 -1414 F X Inlo®HunsakerSD.rnm tl i To CIT-I oP E�tLWITAS Date 8 -(0-0Z E�t�ei.iEFtLL�f 5. 1 T'. Project hln¢nn:4 -A-AeSA 505 \/,JLC/-1,Al Av E l ko s-1 G1[_w, TA 5 Csa W.O. No. Za4- - t3S Attn. �ESr3P�l6 �tSl�saQT We are forwarding A By Messenger J By Mail J Your Pick Up No. Copies Description kv1Ap AICD l tlrO57 LGQ.TL�XCATE. OF t!pc><Q.EZTIO,�I TO SIS Q�ECbC! -pL 0 Lo Cr Cc-�Py "[T 6E ED (ZL`T�tta�1L"(� 'TLS t4un7S,.v tiGEtZ PLW.ASE l l4 lt�E�t( V-0 t2 eec�oiti9C- Comments V>em,, E f--- So[LQ�e THE S T7c S IL So CnA-\6%I D,Cwia 502 1--S. is C146^AO- Tt"IEQn9\/ f*+uD !T- IS KAQp T-p GIgT KI S S 1 &NATV QE TE445,ff 4q q s . TNA -IKS 51..1E This material is forwarded for J Your Files J Per Your Request] Approval 9 Checking J Your Review J Other By-151E-4E (�;Aa -CIA RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Dana M. Seguin Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego. CA 92121 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Encinitas City Clerk 5050 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 THE w. GINAI OF THIS DOCIIfENT WS RECORDED ON AUG 20, 2002 I IUKHT 0KR 2002 - 0705850 GREGORY J. SMITH, CaRtiY RECORDER SAN DIEW MTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TINE: 3 :25 PH SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION (Pursuant to Section 66469 of the Subdivision Map Act or Section 8770.5 of the Land Surveyor's Act as they may be amended.) NOTICE IS GIVEN that Tract No. 98 -171, Map No. 14057 in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said county, October 19, 2000, is in error and is corrected in accordance with Section 8770.5 of the Land Surveyors Act or Section 66469 of the Subdivision Map Act as follows: LIST OF CORRECTIONS SHEET 4 OF 6 SHEETS • Set a 2" x 24" iron pipe with disc stamped "LS. 6215" at the northeast subdivision boundary corner on the centerline of Quail Gardens Drive. ♦ Found a lead and disc stamped "RCE 23956" at a 9.45 -foot offset in the curb measured at right angles to the westerly right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive in lieu of a lead and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" to be set at an offset of 9.75 feet at the most northeasterly corner of Lot 19 on the northerly subdivision boundary and the right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. • Found a lead and disc stamped "RCE 23956" at a 9.75 -foot offset in the curb in lieu of a lead and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" to be set at the southerly terminus of Curve Delta 18 °12'00 ", radius 586.00 and length 186.14 feet on the westerly right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. • Unless otherwise listed set a nail and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" on top of wall or pilaster at all rear lot corners in lieu of a 1/2" x 18" rebar with aluminum cap as shown on Sheet 4. ♦ Set a 1/2" x 18" rebar and aluminum cap marked "L.S. 6215" per record at the southwesterly corner of Lot 7. • Set a 1/2" x 18" rebar and aluminum cap marked "L.S. 6215" at a 2.00 -foot offset in lieu of a 1/2" x 18" rebar and aluminum cap set at the actual location at the following locations: At the rear corner common to Lot 8. Lot 17 and Lot 19 being the northerly terminus of course bearing North 04 020'00" West, 144.96 feet. Said 2.00 -foot offset bears westerly at right angles to said course Page 1 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION CITY OF ENCINITAS • At the backline angle point in Lot 10 being the northeasterly terminus of course bearing North 56 °08'15" East, 29.16 feet. Said 2.00 -foot offset bears northwesterly at right angles to said course. At the back line angle point in Lot 11 being the northeasterly terminus of course bearing North 63 000'00" East, 51.00 feet. Said 2.00 -foot offset bears northwesterly at right angles to said course. SHEET 5 OF 6 SHEETS Set a nail and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" on top of a pilaster in lieu of a 1/2" x 18" rebar with aluminum cap at the following locations: • At the rear corner common to Lots 14 and 15. • At the point of curviture on the rear line of Lot 15 being the northerly terminus of course bearing North 00 °17'00" West, 133.01 feet. At the rear corner common to Lots 15 and 16. • Set a lead and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" in the curb at a 9.65 -foot offset in lieu of a 9.75 -foot offset at the southeast corner of Lot 1 along the westerly right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. ♦ Set a 2" x 24" iron pipe with disc stamped "L.S. 6215" at the most easterly southeasterly subdivision boundary corner on the centerline of Quail Gardens Drive. ♦ The northerly curve return at Quail Gardens Drive and Lauren Court shown as Curve Data C3 at the northeasterly terminus was set at a 8.65 -foot offset in the curb measured on a radial line South 68 °45'16" East in lieu of a 9.75 -foot offset at right angles to the right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. ♦ The southerly curve return at Quail Gardens Drive and Lauren Court shown as Curve Data C4 at the southeasterly terminus was set at a 0.50 -foot offset in the curb measured on a radial line North 42 024'06" East, in lieu of a 9.75 -foot offset at right angles to the right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. Page 2 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION CITY OF ENCINITAS CERTIFICATE OF ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR I certify that the following are the names of all the present fee owners of real property affected by such corrections: No. Owner I Address 1 Barratt American Inc. 1 5950 Priestley Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008 I further certify that the above Certificate of Correction was prepared by or under the direction and control of the undersigned registered civil engineer or licensed surveyor V,ND U 2P 0 ¢ GOZ7 Dana Michael Seguin L.S 6215 ° L.S. 6215 Z Exp. 3/31/02 / Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. a 56.smm m=WX13S o2dm I, City Engineer of the City of Encinitas, State of California, certify that I have examined the foregoing Certificate of Correction and find that the only changes shown hereon are changes provided for by Section 66469 of the Subdivision Map Act. Leroy C. Bodas R.C.E. 22312 Exp. 9/30/05 For City Engineer [ or ] Deputy: Print Name, Title 2 RCE or�S 2` 3�Z Exp BY: � DATE. A/ ley Page 3 of 3 H U N S A KE R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 min (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: September 12, 2001 TO: City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 FROM: Sean Englert PROJECT: North Mesa W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Checking ® Your Review NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 3 Copies of plat & legal 1 $200 check for processing fees 1 Copy of traverse closures 1 Copy of vesting deed for Lot 19 1 (ON of m#p w. 14x51 COMMENTS: i ❑ Mail ❑ Approval El Please plan check the attached plat & legal. I spoke with Debra Geishart about this project if you should have any questions or feel free to call myself. Will the City provide a grant of easement document to go along with the plat & legal or is this something that I will need to draft up? Please let me know about this issue on the returned plan check. Thank you for your time. EXHIBIT "A" EP I < LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LOT 19 OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -171 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO, 14057 IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER ON OCTOBER 19, 2000, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEING A 2.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND LYING EASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOTS 12, 13, 14, 15, AND 16, SAID 2.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND ALSO LIES ADJACENT TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT 3.00 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF ENCINITAS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PURPOSES AS DEPICTED ON SAID MAP NO. 14057. THE SIDELINES OF SAID 2.00 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE NORTHERLY IN A LINE THAT IS PERPENDICULAR WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY OF QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 12 AS DEPICTED ON SAID MAP NO. 14057 AND SOUTHERLY IN THE NORTHEASTERLY PROJECTION OF THAT COURSE IN THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 16 AS DEPICTED ON SAID MAP NO. 14057 AS NORTH 44 043'00" EAST. 30.41 FEET. CONTAINS 964 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. DANA MICHAEL SEGUIN L.S. 6215 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. PAGE 1 OF 1 :SE Ma0294\1321Legal Descnptions1A11 2' LM Esmt.doc WO 294 -132 9112101 PQ N O S� =Gj AE� S' ELF F � O 6215 Z L Exp.3 /31/02 EXHIBIT "B" 60 0 60 120 180 1 J SCALE 1' = 60' i O ® INDICATES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE NANCE EASEMENT 2 II INDICATES 3' EXISTING EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC, w LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE GRANTED TO THE Q CITY OF ENCINITAS PER MAP NO. 14057 (n 13 12 36' ev In A w A l fy 36' VICINITY MAP xmmrAE ( J it f 2' > \ �c> 1 \ A {r L.S. 6215 {r r J� s Exp. 3 -31 -02 Q 'lF o�2. OF CAl\f DANA M. SEGUIN L.S. 6215 J EXP. 3/31/02 N 444J'00 'E 30.41 ' HUNSAKER 1 & ASSOCIATES S A N M D I E C Q I N C LAUREN COURT MANNW IM Huwwe m soea MNERMC Sm D:p Cl 9= , s 9AVEYM P1058)5 4%0 FX(dS0S&14VI R \M211001fm0➢.d" M.Q I ] -IM 36' ev In A w A l fy 36' E rNEERING SERVICES DEPARTA -T Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations CiCitySubdivision Engineering t U Qf Traffic Engineering Ewbzitas Building Permit Number: r NONE ff ( Assessor's Parcel Number: � J� - � d- I b applies) DEVELOPMENT FEE SUMMARY The City of Encinitas has adopted regulations that require the payment of fees that will contribute to the funding of new infrastructure needed as a result of private development projects. Impact fees assessed and collected through the City Engineer's office that have a citywide benefit are as follows and further described per the given references. Fees Flood Control Traffic Mitigation Account No. 232 -0000- 343.30 -00 233- 0000- 343.30 -00 Ordinance No. 97 -19 91 -24 Municipal Code 23.96 23.94 Other impact fees may be applicable, and include, but are not limited to, fire mitigation fees (Fire Prevention Bureau), park and recreation fees (Current Planning Division), school fees (Cardiff School District, Encinitas Union School District, or San Dieguito Union High School District), sewer fees (Cardiff Sanitation District, Encinitas Sanitary District, or Leucadia County Water District), water fees (Olivenhain Water District or San Dieguito Water District), and the like. Please inquire at the appropriate counter. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ORDINANCE FEE Flood Control S % 1 1;�S' o0 Traffic Mitigation TOTAL: S [ CSI IP5061 /y1asa- Nark Laver Project Address Xhall a.l Applicant's Name // �^,' Private Rd: zz;z I-e4 (street name) �a38 (dwg) �* -1-7/ 771 (case) See worksheet on backside for multiple permits. PREPARE BY: Engin is SI tature DATE: I Community Area Telephone DATE PAID: - Oo RECEIPT #: Received By: AG/ARR/Devel_Fee_Sum_Sht I .doc/ 12.23.99 TEL 760 -633 -2600 / FAX 760 -633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, Califomia 92024 -.i633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 I oft recycled paper PUBLIC FACILITIES FEES WORKSHEET Tract: " Total: S a 2of2 1SG/A RR/Dcrcl F=_Sum Sh12.doc/ 12.23.99 0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE��f�� APPUCANT NAME APPUCANT PERMIT /,�2/ RECEIPT NUMBER /S -b`/3 CHECK NUMBER X6 3 / CASHIER INITALS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant Construction Exempt Organizations Grading Plancheck Grading Inspection Final Map Processing Parcel Map Processing Permanent Encroachment Improvement Plancheck Improvement inspection Temporary Encroachment Street Vacation street Name Change A.P.N. Report Securtty Deposit AC 101 -0000.3450100 CN 101-0000-345-0200 EX 1014000-34S-0400 GR 101.0000 345-0700 EWE r7 Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 PE 1 1o1. 0000 - 3451100 IR 1 101-0000 - 3450900 I I 1 101-0000.3451000 TE 1 101-0000 -345 -1200 VA 1 101 - 0000 - 3451500 SN 1 101-0000-34511300 CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK ENGINEERING ..cPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSIT ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR V TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE = ED ECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED PROJECT NUMBER FIELD I PROJECT # I TOTAL I AMOUNT 1 ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE - SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN) PROJECT # AMOUNT TOTAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT NUMBER / RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS II e DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER AgreementlCovenant AC 101-0000 - 34550100 Construction CN 101 -0000 -345 -0200 Exempt Organizations EX 101. 0000- 345-0400 Grading Plancheck GR 101 - 0000 - 345-0700 Grading Inspection ���� 3CJ• Elt,- GI 101 - 0000 -345 -0800 Final Map Processing FM 101 - 0000.345 -0500 Parcel Map Processing PM 101-0000 - 345-0600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101-0000 - 345.1100 Improvement Plancheck IR 101-0000 - 345 -0900 Improvement inspection 11 101-0000-345 -1000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101-0004345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101. 0004345 -1500 Street Name Change SN 101-0000 - 3451300 A.P.N. Report PN 101-00043452100 SecurttyDeposit /J ` /�/ Z/ ±5 , enr CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL O� Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 T ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSIT ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR I TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER I :1=1d41i111 ;11116"i -l— ? CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE - ED OJECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED O PROJECT NUMBER FIELD I PROJECT # 1 TOTAL I AMOUNT I ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE a SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN) PROJECT * AMOUNT TOTAL O l5 n BOND NUMBER: Ill 3351 2514 UPREMIUM: $100.00 iLL ' 2 FOR: Mom=entation ENGINEFRING SERVICES IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENT FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND WHEREAS, the City of Encinitas (hereinafter referred to as City) and Barratt American Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, (hereinafter referred to as Owner) have entered Into the attached agreement hereby Owner agrees to perform certain designated public improvements in correction with fhe approval of the subdivision T.M. 9a -1 7 1 ( ^r1ESA NORTH LOWER ) which said agreement, identified as Covenant Regarding Real Property (hereinafter referred to as Covenant) Is hereby incorporated Into this surety bond by reference) and WHEREAS, Owner is required under the terms of the Covenant to furnish security in accordance with Section 66499 of the Subdivision Map Act- NOW THEREFORE, We, Owner, and the American Insurance Company, organized and existing raider the laws of the State of New Jersey, and authorized to act as surety in the State of California, as surely, are held and firmly bound until the City in the penal sum of FOUR THOUSAND & N01100 ---------------------- (; 4 000..00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation Is such that if the above bounded owner, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall In all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions In the Covenant and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein speed, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Encinitas, its officers, agents and employees of each, as therein Stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect, subject to the following; 1. As the work required under the covenant proceeds, Owner may submit written requests to the city Engineer of the city (hereinafter referred to as Director) for a reduction in the penal amount of this surety bond. If the director Is satisfied that the amount of the surety bond may be reduced, then, upon inspecting the work performed and verifying the percentage and value of the work remaining to be completed, the Director may authorize the reduction, subject to the restrictions in the covenant. BOND NO. 111 335r 2514 When the Director approves a reduction in the surety bond, he shall notify Owner in writing of the acceptable amount of reduction. When substitute security in the reduced amount has been approved by the legal counsel for the city, the city clerk is authorized to return the original security to the surety. 2. In the event that performance is not completed within the time period specified in the Covenant, or within any time extension granted pursuant to the terms of the Covenant, then, upon receipt of notification and demand by the director, the surety may promptly remedy the default, or shall promptly: a. Complete the Covenant in accordance with its terms and condition, or b_ pay such portion of the proceeds of the surety bond to the City as is necessary to complete the required performance and to reimburse City for reasonable costs incident thereto. Any proceeds of the surety bond remaining after completion of performance and reimbursement of actual City costs shall be refunded to the surety. 3. In the event that the performance required under covenant is completed and accepted by the City of Encinitas, Owner is entitled to a 75°% reduction in the penal amount of the original surety bond. Security for the remaining 25°% of the original surety bond shall continue in effect for one year following completion and acceptance of the required performance in order to secure the warranty. 4. a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as cost and included in any judgment rendered. 5. Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Covenant or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect the obligations under this surety bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the covenant or to the work or to the specifications. 6. Surety hereby agrees to bind itself to, and to perform in strict accordance with, the provisions of this surety bond and the provisions of the covenant which pertain to security and security obligations. 7_ The parties acknowledge that the Covenant is appended to this surety bond. BOND NO. 111 3351 2514 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by Owner and Surety above names, On JULY 11 2000. BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED a Delaware Corporation Principal THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Surety Ldent Attorney -in -Fact TODD M. ROHM Note: (1) Acknowledgements of executon by Principal and Surety must be attached CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORIA I I ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO I On July 12, 2000, before me, Latonia M. West , Notary Public, personally appeared Stephen R. Reid personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. LATONIA M. WEST, Notary Public LATONIA M. WEST _ COMM. #1252915 NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA n SAN DIEGO COUNTY ''I• My Commission Expires Mwc FEBRUARY 7, 2004 THIS AREA FOR OFFICIAL NOTARIAL SEAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT R INDIVIDUAL Monumentation Performance Bond X CORPORATE OFFICER T.M. 98 -171 SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT Mesa North Lower (Quail II) Bond No. 111 3351 2514 TITLE TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT F—IPARTNERS LIMITED GENERAL ATTORNEY -IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY) Barran American Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation 3 NUMBER OF PAGES June 16, 2000 DATE OF DOCUMENT CALIFORNIA ALL- PURPOS CKNOWLEDGMENT State of CALIFORNIA ORANGE County of On 7111100 before me, D..1 0r personally appeared TODD M. ROHM PICARD, NOTARY PUBLIC Name "Tae d Oman le y., -J - Doe, Ndary P tk-) XXXpersonally known to me – OR –❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person" whose named) is/3M subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that hedIexecuted the same in hisNl7} & authorized capacity(, and that by his/K$ signature(Bo on the instrument the person(t), D. J. PICARD V or the entity upon behalf of which the personoe) acted, COMM. #1182404 c executed the instrument. 0 m NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA .`- i ORANGE COUNTY rs a.`% IM Ccmm. F.xPlres M ay 22, 2002 WITNESS my hand and official se #r) sww.e d Nday OPTIONAL Though the inlomiation below a not required by law R may prove valuable to reattachment relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reaftamenf or this ]arm 10 another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: BOND 7/11/00 Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): TODD M. ROHM ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General X8 Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY RIGHT TRUWBPRINT OF SIGNER Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: gIGMTTHU61BPRltn' OF SIGNER ..- ..,ye, .... ..... -,.,w Prod No 5907 necracr. CaA Ton -rrco 1 BW e14S0'1 FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPAN. NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation, THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation redomesticated in Nebraska, ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION, a California corporation, and AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, (herein collectively called "the Companies ") does each hereby appoint Todd M • Rohm, D. J. Picard, Cathy S. Kennedy, Beata A. Sensi or Sejal Patel of Orange, CA their true and lawful Attorney(s) -in -Fact, with full power of authority hereby conferred in their name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other written obligations in the nature thereof ----------- and to bind the Companies thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the corporate seals of the Companies and duly attested by the Companies' Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Attomey(s) -in -Fact may do in the premises. This power of attomey is granted under and by the authority of Article VD of the By -laws of each of the Companies which provisions are now in full force and effect. This power of attorney is signed and sealed under the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of each of the Companies at a meeting duly called and held, or by written consent, on the 19th day of March, 1995, and said Resolution has not been amended or repealed: "RESOLVED, that the signature of any Vice-President., Assistant Secretary, and Resident Assistant Secretary of the Companies, and the seal of the Companies may be affixed or printed on any power of attomey, on any revocation of any power of attorney, or on any certificate relating thereto, by facsimile, and any power of attorney, any revocation of any power of attorney, or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Companies." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused these presents to be signed by their Vice - President, and their corporate seals to be hereunto affixed this 15 t day of May 1 2000 �vc \,,n.,..: ; `w.e a •L , +E. "•CF, ",F:'s oru a' °'w`4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS. COUNTY OF MARIN FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION AMERIC AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY By IV ttt Gi Vice -Pme dent On this 1st day of May , 2000 , before me personally came Donn R. Kolbeck to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he is a Vice - President of each company, described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seals of the said Companies; that the seals affixed to the said instrument are such company seals; that they were so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said companies and that he signed his name thereto by like order. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year herein first above written L OCAMPO Commission # 1163726 z � �y v Notary Public - Calitomia £_ i- Main County STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS. Mycomm. No Public COUNTY OF MARIN f I, the undersigned, Resident Assistant Secretary of each company, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore that Article VII of the By -laws of each company, and the Resolution of the Board of Directors; set forth in the Power of Attorney, are now in force. Signed and sealed at the County of Marin. Dated the 11TH day of JULY 2000 y���9C •l.^'�M'ir'h \ § <�'s •� <NnM3IL �'i'�NY��F,yi, N ,V 't <J" Yc, t0+ IgCf •ca�� +,.,��r WR�,a� ji[Sldcnt AS5151]Of S[RCLV)' r BOND NUMBER: 111 3351 2506 PREMIUM: $2,055. 00 FOR: Improvements (Public road, Drainage, and Trail Improvements) GRADING IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENT FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND WHEREAS, the City of Encinitas (hereinafter referred to as City) and Barratt American Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, (hereinafter referred to as Owner) have entered into the attached agreement hereby Owner agrees to perform certain designated public improvements in connection with the approval of the subdivision T.M. 98-171 ("MESA NORTH LOWER ") which said agreement, identified as Covenant Regarding Real Property (hereinafter referred to as Covenant) is hereby incorporated into this surety bond by reference) and WHEREAS, Owner is required under the terms of the Covenant to furnish security in accordance with Section 66499 of the Subdivision Map Act NOW THEREFORE, We, Owner, and the American Insurance Company, organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and authorized to act as surety in the State of California, as surety, are held and firmly bound until the City in the penal sum of FOUR HUNDRED ELEVEN THOUSAND SIXTY -FOUR & N0 /100-------------------- -- ---- ($ a i 1, o6a ::0:0j lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded owner, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the Covenant and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein speed, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Encinitas, its officers, agents and employees of each, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect, subject to the following; t. As the work required under the covenant proceeds, Owner may submit written requests to the city Engineer of the city (hereinafter referred to as Director) for a reduction in the penal amount of this surety bond. If the director is satisfied that the amount of the surety bond may be reduced, then, upon inspecting the work performed and verifying the percentage and value of the work remaining to be completed, the Director may authorize the reduction, subject to the restrictions in the covenant. i N0. 111 3351 2056 When the Director approves a reduction in the surety bond, he shall notify Owner in writing of the acceptable amount of reduction. When substitute security in the reduced amount has been approved by the legal counsel for the city, the city clerk is authorized to return the original security to the surety_ 2. In the event that performance is not completed within the time period specified in the Covenant, or within any time extension granted pursuant to the terms of the Covenant, then, upon receipt of notification and demand by the director, the surety may promptly remedy the default, or shall promptly: a. Complete the Covenant in accordance with its terms and condition, or b. Pay such portion of the proceeds of the surety bond to the City as is necessary to complete the required performance and to reimburse City for reasonable costs incident thereto. Any proceeds of the surety bond remaining after completion of performance and reimbursement of actual City costs shall be refunded to the surety. 3. In the event that the performance required under covenant is completed and accepted by the City of Encinitas, Owner is entitled to a 75°% reduction in the penal amount of the original surety bond. Security for the remaining 25°% of the original surety bond shall continue in effect for one year following completion and acceptance of the required performance in order to secure the warranty. 4. a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attomey's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as cost and included in any judgment rendered. 5. Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Covenant or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect the obligations under this surety bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the covenant or to the work or to the specifications. 6. Surety hereby agrees to bind itself to, and to perform in strict accordance with, the provisions of this surety bond and the provisions of the covenant which pertain to security and security obligations. 7. The parties acknowledge that the Covenant is appended to this surety bond. dD NO. 111 3351 2506 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by Owner and Surety above names, on July 11 , 2000. BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED a Delaware Comoration Principal Stephen R. Reid, Senior Vice President THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Surety 'T� Attorney -in -Fact TODD M. ROHM Note: (1) Acknowledgements of execution by Principal and Surety must be attached CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORIA I I ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO I On July 12, 2000, before me, Latonia M. West , Notary Public, personally appeared Stephen R. Reid personally known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. LATONIA M. WEST, Notary Public 1 ... LATONIA M. WEST COMM. #1252915 y s NOTARY PUBLIC- CALIFORNIA N U SAN DIEGO COUNTY 0 My Commission Expires FEBRUARY 7, 2004 THIS AREA FOR OFFICIAL NOTARIAL SEAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER R1 INDIVIDUAL X CORPORATE OFFICER SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT TITLE DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Grading/Improvement Performance Bond T.M 98 -171 Mesa North Lower (Quail II) Bond No. 1 1 1 3351 2506 TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ❑ PARTNERS B LMTED GENERAL ATTORNEY -IN -FACT TRUSTEE(S) GUARDIAN /CONSERVATOR OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY) Barratt American Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation 3 NUMBER OF PAGES June 16, 2000 DATE OF DOCUMENT CALJFORNIA ALL- PURPO' ACKNOWLEDGMENT Stale of County of CALIFORNIA On 7/11/00 Dale personally appeared before me, D.J. PICARD, NOTARY PUBLIC TODD M. RORM Name" TIN Of Omar(ap.-"ft Doe. N qPW -) Names) d Spur(,) XXX personally known to me – OR –❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person" whose namelle) is /X02 subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heXMIAMMq( executed the same in hisfARNIM authorized capacity00, and that by his/M9 signature(Iit) on the instrument the person(X), u;? D. J. PICARD or the entity upon behalf of which the personQC) acted, °• COMM. 91182404 i7 executed the instrument. NOTARY PUBLIC Cr1LIF0 1 .`.. ~ • ' � OFANGE COUNTY r w My fomm. Eapves May 22, 2002 WITNESS my hand and Offi 'al seal. ..I Na" Pudic OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: 7/11/00 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer G TODD M. ROHM Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Attomey -in -Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY BON) RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER �-1 Number of Pages: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing RIGM THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER .Ii rv— nwry---e<.+nmr,—..ve.. r.v ms f ie' vargga rack. GA 913 71M PIW NO 5907 ric»raer GI TM Free 1 B00- B]9aB2] FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY A- MERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation, THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation redomesticated in Nebraska, ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION, a California corporation, and AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation. (herein collectively called "the Companies") does each hereby appoint Todd M. Rohm, D. J. Picard, Cathy S. Kennedy, Beata A. Sensi or Sejal Patel of Orange, CA their true and lawful Attorney(s) -in -Fact, with full power of authority hereby conferred in their name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge and debver any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other written obligations in the nature thereof ----------- and to bind the Companies thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the corporate seals of the Companies and duly attested by the Companies' Secretary, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Attorney(s) -in -Fact may do in the premises. This power of attorney is granted under and by the authority of Article VD of the By -laws of each of the Companies which provisions are now in full force and effect. This power of attorney is signed and sealed under the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of each of the Companies at a meeting duly called and held, or by written consent, on the 19th day of March, 1995, and said Resolution has not been amended or repealed: "RESOLVED, that the signature of any Vice - President, Assistant Secretary, and Resident Assistant Secretary of the Companies, and the seal of the Companies may be affixed or printed on any power of attorney, on any revocation of any power of attorney, or on any certificate relating thereto, by facsimile, and any power of attorney, any revocation of any power of attorney, or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Companies:' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companies have caused these presents to be signed by their Vice - President, and their corporate seals to be hereunto affixed this 1st day of May 1 2000 Y a.lgl �•G `NAN'1! � WfR��y � Y a -EREwi.6E �,� °d ry aM ti' �ww.wn"".+"! �NCF coN I,IC[•CD��, f!(MS!!�J- z STATE OF CALIFORNIA l SS. COUNTY OF MARIN J FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ASSOCIATED INDEMNCfY CORPORATION AMERIC AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY By IV- {stn... Gc Vice- President On this 1st day of May , 2000 , before me personally came Donn R. Kolbeck to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he is aVice- President of each company, described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seals of the said Companies: that the seals affixed to the said instrument are such company seals: that they were so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said companies and that he signed his name thereto by like order. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year herein first above written L OCAMPO Commission N 1163726 -I. Notary Public - Califomia § _ Madn County k�VA STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS. MY Cam' No ry Public COUNTY OF MARIN J I, the undersigned, Resident Assistant Secretary of each company. DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore that Article VII of the By -laws of each company, and the Resolution of the Board of Directors; set forth in the Power of Attorney, are now in force. Signed and sealed at the County of Mann. Dated the 11TH day of JULY 2000 ya•' YC a a l\ I a, 'tNAN 1 !G tit.'GMYii jy'i ✓' fir 4y, "�G ZaQ scrtsYro D �l e. - r :�;s[wr.61 Fbyaa"'a'� •�`��! z :+ate `rL���V^'aa� ib�+i' '�ll''r� n wc. N e +r�[•ceNWR,. Resident Assistant Scaetary ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FOKM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS / (� f �] ✓e rtyr a/� Cv� s sf• S�+ r D�'ur o G °1oZ I Z PERMIT NUMBER X038 — 4;i K RECEIPT NUMBER "L 3 F5 'R CHECK NUMBER 6/55 CASHIER INITALS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant AC 101-0000 - 345-0100 Construction CN 101 -0000 -345 -0200 Exempt Organizations EX 101.0000- 345-0400 ! Grading Plancheck 600.0 GR 101- 0000. 345-0700 Grading Inspection GI 101 -0000 - 345 -0800 Final Map Processing FM 101-0000 - 345-0500 Parcel Map Processing PM 101-0000- 345 -0600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101'0000 - 345-1100 Improvement Plancheck IR 101-0000 -345 -0900 Improvement inspection II 101 -0000 - 345-1000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101.0000-345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101- 0000-345 -1500 Street Name Change SN 101-0000. 345 -1300 A.P.N. Report PN 101. 0000 -345 -2100 Security Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL #600, 00 Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /Oct151998 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSIT ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANTADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER I RECEIPT NUMBER Lem Xd 1:CR',1 14:7 CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE - ED PROJECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED INTO PROJECT NUMBER FIELD PROJECT # AMOUNT TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE = SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN) PROJECT # 7 AMOUNT TOTAL I I CITY OF ENCINITAS 1 6038/GR/GI TOTAL C1£Ch Tender Details C1C.O: 164282 DATE= 10/15/99 6975.00 TIME: 11 :01 :02 �.> CUSTOMER RECEIPT +s -• ���� PATCH ID: CASHIER 10/15/99 a hnk f!.PT : CO]0095 �f115, d DESCRIPTION QTY AMOUNT my ENT- PI `V 1 $700.Ci0 • 3Ri!Oi �!t� 1'1W L.f ^.- r.,R CK v BARRATT AMERICAN INC :. a � t ENGINEERING / uRADTNG P IOIC00034517CO 1 BARRATT AMERICAN Itf 9275.00 GRAOINa INSPECT: 61 C.. NOR ENGINEERING / GRADING 1 10100003450800 6038/GR/GI TOTAL C1£Ch Tender Details C1C.O: 164282 DATE= 10/15/99 6975.00 TIME: 11 :01 :02 DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED T'"E - coAREl-..- :��EASE �oTivv �sE�TOmPrcv no wcce� ov LO n: DELUXE FORM WVC -3 V -3 DATE INVOICE NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DEDUCTIONS NET AMOUNT PARTICULARS AMOUNT )/13/99 101399 Design Review Permit Fe Quail Ridge $975.00 EH 143521.1211.0223 Va ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE 1 15 lot APPLICANT NAME 9�✓ r� �fi }�w� �� �`�^ j �c APPLICANT ADDRESS II 2- 03 S Cor t e- c�a� S�t• f 6 G� PERMIT NUMBER /b Cci,r�S�ja� c/T °1ZO0� RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS� ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE Agreement/Covenant AC 101-00003450100 Construction CN 101 -0000. 345-0200 Exempt Organizations EX 101-0000. 345-0400 Grading Plancheck 700, O 0 GR 1014000 - 345-0700 Grading Inspection a2'-7-5. O O GI 101-0000- 345 -0800 Final Map Processing FM 1014000 - 345 -05 0 Parcel Map Processing PM 101-0000 - 345.0600 Permanent Encroachment PE 1014)000 - 3451100 Improvement Plancheck IR 101-0000345 -0900 Improvement inspection II 101 -0000- 345 -1000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101-0000 - 345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101- 0000 - 3451500 Street Name Change SN 1014000-345-1300 A.P.N. Report PN 101-0000 - 3452100 Securtty Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL Gl 77r• O y r Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 ENGINEERING DL. ARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSIT .,TION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE - ED PROJECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED NTO PROJECT NUMBER FIELD I PROJECT X I TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE m SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN) PROJECT # I F AMOUNT TOTAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE G IS APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT NUMBER �7 0 3 S 6L 12 / F=AA RECEIPT NUMBER (P S l CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS eI roe IPJ !V� •(5A0Adj e, l60 9'2.009 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant AC 101-0000- 345-0100 Construction CN 101-0000- 345-0200 Exempt Organizations EX 101-0000 - 345-0400 Grading Plancheck 5000, 00 GR 101 - 0000-045-0700 Grading Inspection GI 101 -0000- 345.0800 Final Map Processing 5760, 00 FM 101. 0000 - 345 -0500 Parcel Map Processing PM 101- 0000- 345 -0600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101-0000 - 3451100 Improvement Plancheck IR 101-0000- 3450900 Improvement inspection II 101-0000- 345 -1000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101-0000 -345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101-0000 - 3451500 Street Name Change SN 101 -0000- 345 -1300 A.P.N. Report PN 101 -0000.3452100 Securtty Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAJ /0 760.0 O Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /Oct151998 ENGINEERING I.�PARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSs i mCTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS 74, ] i I l (e Z s Zol .]$ I I I A ref: TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER Chi:iXd:tUll�I -] =[A CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE a ED PROJECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED NTO PROJECT NUMBER FIELD PROJECT # TOTAL I AMOUNT I ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE = SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN PROJECT # AMOUNT TOTAL H U N SA KE R & ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: November 20, 2000 TO: Encinitas, City of Engineering Department 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 FROM: Tina Kessler for Diane Ingram PROJECT: North Mesa Lower W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up ❑ Mail Ii:I6 i�'i�til1G��637iI:LTTLi:I1 11261: ® Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Approval ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 Set of Original Mylars Sheets 1, 1P, 2P, 3P of 18 DWG. # 6038 -G & 6038 -G 2A 4 Sets of the revised sheets. 2 sets wet signed for building permits COMMENTS: H U N S A K E R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Hue ego, C s Street S A N D I E G O 1 N C. San Diego, 4 0 PH (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: November 6, 2000 TO: Jeff Garami Encinitas, City of 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 FROM: Diane Ingram PROJECT: North Mesa Lower Dwg. 6038 -G W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ® Per Your Request ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION NOV 0 7 ?0 ❑ Mail ❑ Approval 2 Prints approved delta 1 construction change sheets 1 & 4 Original mylars of same Previous city transmittal COMMENTS: H U N S A K E R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Hueuuekeus Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 5584500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: November 2, 2000 TO: Jeff Garami Encinitas, City of 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 FROM: Diane Ingram for Rob D'amaro PROJECT: North Mesa Lower Dwg. 6038 -G Delta 1 construction change W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up ❑ Mail THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ® Per Your Request ❑ Approval ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ G> IK■] 91 x.'� ■] AYH :t I j I [�L` Original mylars sheets 1 & 4 with delta 1 revision for signature Previous 'I't plan check COMMENTS: El VEERING SERVICES DEPARTD 7 Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering City Qf Traffic Engineering Encinitas RELEASE OF ORIGINAL DRAWINGS & DOCUMENTS DATE RELEASED: tt7 - t"t -co DATE DUE BACK: �lS4P -_ RETURNED? PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWING NUMBER: 10 SHEET/PAGE NUMBER: I `Ie DESCRIPTION: MA, . Mr-S& 1 -.'M'J VZ- ia/Linen/Paper PLAN RELEASED TO: NAME: hlvN'SsE 5. &St ATTN: 9,pn D A' "4,42" BLUEPRINT COMPANY /OTHER REQUESTOR ADDRESS: t o t 't.°1 STREET d A; + `tom "317, t z CITY STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER: ( J0450 0 )- 55S • 4-c;-00 PURPOSE OF RELEASE: (Circle One) Duplicatio wctien 6kart As- uilts/Recordation PLAN CHANGE DESCRIPTION: PAO %E t_ . t—c>T I Z SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 120'4tSE tuA L.AR -t; The undersigned acknowledges that the drawings and/or documents described above are the property of the City of Encinitas. The undersigned accepts all responsibility for the drawings and/or documents and will return said drawings and/or documents before the date specified above. PLANS RECEIVED BY: COURIER COMPANY: PREPARED BY: T OtI -Ae%ti- Authorized Department Representative IWARR/Release.dod02.02.99 1 of I TEL 760 - 633 -2600 1 FAX 760- 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 - 633 -2700 0 recycled paper E, NEERING SERVICES DEPARTM. . INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM J Copltol Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) tf Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: DATE: /O g //�''' Regarding (Finance Number � DEPOS E TP /MIN (Finance Number DEPO !� " (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: i Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title reportNesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Corporate/Partnership Papers [] Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* CJ � al I pte & Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • (CD /CS/F F/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /Ci&ur/CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other biplks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer /rraiUPark/Facility) Grading Plan Submitta Ian Change/ s- ilt Proposed ❑ Corrected Approv Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint Original Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Prelimin ecise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if yy. (Erosion Control/Planting 1ga ton) As Per... Submittal Re ements K Our Conversatio Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use E] Approval Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR 7 " (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARRAntrii Trans.doc/02.11.99 1 of E< . - .rINEERINC SERVICES DEPARTS - ✓T INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subcivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services L_D) ❑ Office of the Director (#I) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: �/ `-' DATE: ��_ /✓ ter] // Regarding (Finance Numbe - DEPOSIT EE TPP/MIN/Djt� (Finance Number _) DEPOSI WJ (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved iM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps p Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • ( CD/ CS /FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &FfT /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks fo additional items, if any. (Road/Drainage /Water /Sewed frail/Park/Facility) I�W f e✓ '� Grading Plan / Submi Ian Change /As -b Proposed Correct ❑ Approved Blueline/Red -lined Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/M4 ❑ Cos: Estirncte ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal R trements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature C1 Information ❑ SS ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG/ARRAntra_Trans.doc/02.11.99 1 of I H U N SA KE R & ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: September 12, 2000 TO: Tamara O'Neal Encinitas, City of 505 Vulcan Avenue D Encinitas, CA 92024 E 000 FROM: Robert D'Amaro ;- ;'iCEITAs PROJECT: North Mesa Lower city dwg no. 6038 -G W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up ❑ Mail THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ® Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Approval ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 2 Redlines for construction change .K�L'J51��Ib91 ECLIPSE MESSENGER SERVICE, INC. 877.546+ *001 ,a.. TYPE • SERVICE: TICKET NO ❑ c Direct ❑ MEIC..+R 0 Rush - 2 hrs. (w/In O.C.) � ❑ ECLIPSE • Delivery w /In 4 hrs. REFERENCE NO. ❑ HALF MOON • Some Day ❑ FULL MOON • Next Day DATE DELIVERY CHARGES BASE RATE C"AR" Tp. / PICK UP. - [111.1 0: _ � I I - J-- x/, r✓ " .o C_. f. ' sI �Y'r` ` - - - WAR TIME ADD ADDRESS'. ADD SS: -- RETURN _— TRIP CITY CITY - Cm CANCEL- •r, n. / LATION $ CIA INS U ON : Our IIObW (or lost Or damage t0 any delivery Is limited RECEIVED BY E. to $200.00. The maximum Ilablllty stated may be Increased by notifying Eclipse Messenger Service in x r WEIGHT advance that " Items to be delivered have a value exceeding $204 ata castor $2 per $100 value declared PRIM M NIGHT In excess at $200. X CHARGE DRIVER. C DRIVER IVER3 SFLII l SFLI TOTAL CHARGE H U N S A K E R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: August 18, 2000 TO: Jeff Garami City of Encinitas Engineering Department FROM: Diane Ingram PROJECT: North Mesa Lower TM 98 -171 W.O.: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: E Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up ❑ Mail THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ® Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Approval ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 4 Prints approved Grading & Pvt. Improvement Plan Dwg. 6038 -G Original mylars of same COMMENTS: TO: Tamara City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue B A R R A T T LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: 11- Aug -00 PROJECT: Encinitas Ranch north mesa Encinitas, CA 92024 TRACT No.; 1435 98171 WE ARE FORWARDING: x BY MESSENGER BY MAIL BY UPS BY AIRBORNE No. COPIES DESCRIPTION the above bluelines COMMENTS: Tamara, I will have the Fully approved Mylars submitted to the City of Encinitas no later than 8/16. I am hoping that these signed plans will a Barratt to remain on the 8/16 agenda. Please call me if ou have any quest(an 760 431 0800. You may also contact Richard Carlsori,b otutty Neale 858 694 2548 THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ENGME Fi ENCIN7 ES AS INFORMATION and /or FILES x PER YOU REVIEW AT THE REQUEST OF APPROVAL FOR PROCESSING SIGNATURE OTHER cc: File BY: ,. BOB LINDER, PLANNING & ENGINEERING Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte Del Nogal, Suite 160, Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 431 -0800 Contractor's License No. 407512 _ rl 1� Our Review rV�Pdi Our Approval ❑ VEERING SERVICES DEPARTM, INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineenng Trolfic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (NI) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T— _;rCommuniN Development- Current Planning Jul "e Ln14 54_ O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: ` San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning Community Services — Parks & Beaches DATE: �V Regarding (Finance Number" j�-BEPOSIT EE TP P/Ml R: - % 1 (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE e� pf (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Final el Map [] Final Map heck eckpri / Approved Copy / Original / New or vised L Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Gra 'an vi eck / Approved Copy wee�5 /-i, 4 / Original Check New or evised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: ' ( Staff/ Consultant/CD/Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): 7-, 37ae, s7� (PubligZ Lvgs) d/ Drainage /Water /Sewer/Trai VPark/Faci lity) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: aI & Irrieatio As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction Comment Q Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Z"��e q X83 Please return �� Please call: / if necessary Originator: Copies to: me 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG/ARR/lnter_Trms . dod03.02.99 1 of I EI. _ - NEERING SERVICES DEPARTM� f Copital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/lntra Trans.doc/02.11.99 1 of I T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: DATE: Regarding (Finance Numbe D 1 DEPOSIT E TP P/MIN/DR: (Finance Number DEPOSI (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APtW. Transmitted as following: _� Comments /Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final D ap Submitt rided/Correct Inte Memo' 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Proposed ❑ Correc d Approved ce E Certificate 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Blueline/Red-lined Che kprint ❑ Original E ❑ Approved TM/IPM ❑ R olution of Appr al ❑ Coastal Pemm V ❑ Tax Certificate 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other ❑ Preliminary Title Report Guarantee bfl 0 6) Copies to: eAli Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utili Letter' a Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: Q Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: C S IRE/ D /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/ /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ etch ( ded) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement ❑ !�� �/ re: Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/P�y,ate,) Note: See other blocks fo/r additional items, if any. Roa Drainage /Water /SewerrfraiVPark/Facility) II Grading Plan "r Submi Ian Change/ s -built G Approved • Proposed ❑ Cor�r.,ef��d ❑ cc Blueline/Red -lined M Checkprint ❑ Original Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ ,.y/ f ' 7� Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (M ough/Pre in Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Eros o I ting &Irrigation) q r As Per... Submittal R uirements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review [[3 Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ '13 �a�dM I ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/lntra Trans.doc/02.11.99 1 of I H U N SA K E R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O, I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: August 9, 2000 TO: Tamara O'Neal Encinitas, City of 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 FROM: Robert D'Amaro PROJECT: North mesa Lower w.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 original mylars revised sheets 4 and 9 2 of revised sheets showing changes Previous planchecks AW_8 ❑ Mail ® Approval t BLUE t-tfJ£ of R- EvtSEO t_br40Su49E PuDN S � R OIANE 1N P�•DNN 1 N h COMMENTS: Tamara The mylars for the landscape plans with the county signature will be sent as soon as possible. Rob TYPE OF SERVICE: E -C L P S E C LET • Direct ❑ _iEOR • Rush - 2 his. (w /in O.C.) MESSENGER SERVICE, INC. ❑ ECUPSE • Delivery w /in 4 hrs. 8779546o3001-- ❑ HALF MOON • Some Day ❑FULL MOON • Next Day TICKET NO. v (J I �} f DATE / r i DELIVERY CHANGES REFERENCE NO. BASE RAZE CHAN" PO: s"o FICI( LIP. r� �[ L Iuusk&f DELIVER M. 1�1r ( �%��i.)����. WAIT TIME A['1-1 c,. ADDRESS'. i . J�)r rJ_ ADDRESS. O VI/LCAN RETURN `RIP CITY'. S AME'� CITY: L F r 1( . tI T ^. J\ CANCEI- LATION SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Our liability for 1ou or damn to any delivery IS Ilmited to $200.00. The maximum liability Stated may be Increased W notifying EcIIDSe Messenger Service In advance that the IterTM t0 be delivered have a value exceeding $200, at a cost of $2 per $100 value declared in exCM of $200. RECEIVED AY: TIME: - X ` WEIGHT PRINT NAME: TIME: Z .. NIGHT CHARGE DRIVER I DRNER2 DRIVER J SPLIT SPLIT 2 TOTAL CHARGE H U N S A K E R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH SPLANNING s ENGINEERING SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: August 4, 2000 _ 7 2 5 7 � 1 TO: Tamara O'Neal Encinitas, City of AUG 9 M 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCI.NITAS FROM: Dave Vlera _ - - - -- PROJECT: Tract 98 -171 (Lower North Mesa) - 6t" Map submittal w.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request Checking ❑ Your Review NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 4 Prints of proposed Map 1 Original Mylars of Map 1 Tax Certificate 1 LCWD signature omission letter 1 Fire Dept "Memorandum" 1 Updated Subdivision Guarantee COMMENTS: Tamara, Please call me at ext 405 with any questions. Thank you. ❑ Mail ❑ Approval NEERING SERVICES DEPARTA. T INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdvision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ❑ Mraffrc Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (Hl) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development - Current Planning ✓' O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: San Dieeuito Water District- Eneineering & Planning / / Community Services— Parks & Beaches �L/ DATE: Regarding (Finance Number d� {a DEPOSITIFEE TP j�P/MIN/D R: W - (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE 11 Q " (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: ' ( Staff / Consultant /CD/Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/W a ter /Sewer/frail/Park/Faci I ity) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised —� -- Grading Plan Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New o vised Plan Change Description: (Mass/Rough/Prelim' (Erosion Contra ting / As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction ❑ Co ent Signature Z Information ❑ Uses Please return aY / z � f 5 Please call: if necessary Originator: / Ne21 Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG /ARR/Inter_Trans.doc/03.02.99 1 of I E- 1NEERING SERVICES DEPARTIi. JT 1 Capitol Improvement Projects \ District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services ( _D) ❑ Office of the Director (01) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ � r ATTENTION: l I'�r� DATE: Regarding (Finance Numbe DEPOSIT TP /MIA�/IPR: (Finance Number DEPOSIT E d (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments /Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/fPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change A plication ❑ Preliminary Title Report O Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title repor[Nesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat O Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: C I SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &Err /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ etc (i ceded) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maine ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Publi r'vate Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Roadf Drainage /Water /Sewer/Traii/Park/Facility) /Q �/ r Grading Plan ❑ Submitta an Chang 9�s -bui Proposed ❑ Corre ed Blueline/Red -lined Checkprint ❑ Original Hydraulic Calcula[ions/Map ❑ Cost Est' una e t epo Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Cal lations Note: See other blocks for additional items, ' any. (Mass ou 1' e V (Erosion Contr lancing &Irrig71nformation As Per... Submittal quireme ❑ Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ For Your... Review Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ ORIGINATOR: J5 (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Intra- Trws.doc/02. 11.99 1 of I HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES S A N D I E G O 1 N C. PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH (858) 558 -1414 FX IN0111ZNky,i11 ir_Ia4Ai9 =1V DATE: July 28, 2000 TO: Jeff Garami � �— Encinitas, City of �I�� 2 S 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 ENGINEERING SERVICES FROM: Robert D'Amaro L. CITY OF ENCINITAS z .-7 PROJECT: North Nesa Lower W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ® Per Your Request ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 Additional copy of Landscape plans ❑ Mail ❑ Approval El COMMENTS: Jeff; sent the first package before it received your e -mail. This is the 5th set you requested. Rob HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES S A N D I E G O 1 N C. PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING SURVEYING 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH (858) 558 -1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: July 27, 2000 TO: Tamara O'Neal Encinitas, City of 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 FROM: Robert D'Amaro PROJECT: North Mesa Lower W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: H Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ® Per Your Request ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION /' pvj� k �/ 4 Revised landscape plans �I ❑ Mail ❑ Approval 0 2 Revised grading and improvements sheets 4 & 5 1 Revised signed mylars sheets 4 & 5 L NT � COM T � f N R or CC-S Tamara, s Diane Langager requested he landscape plans be routed through engineering. I have initiated the process with the county health dept re: their signature on the landscape plans. One set of copies of the grading and impr. sheets are highlighted with the changes. L WEERING SERVICES DEPARTN.-<JT Capital Improvement Projects Distnct Support Services Feld Operations Subdvision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development- Current Planning O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: San Dieeuito Water District - Engineering & Planning DrCommuni Services — Parks & B chess DATE: Regarding (Finance Number /_� DEPOSIT/ E TPP/MI l �N/JDR: (Finance Number _� DEPOSI �UQ (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: �, /_ ✓ Other Application: r Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New evi d Comments/Additional Space for Document: 7 lrnuu �TTS F[jlZwJ�lZ117�Z> TO /7..:7-V ( Staff / Consultant (CD/Fire /SD WD /OM WD/LC WD) Sketch (if needed): Zo•3 �-� ` �.,� ,. � Improvement Plan ❑ C ck Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or R ised 1� (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/Trai VPark/Fac ility) Grading Plan Check Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: Checkprint ! Approved Copy / Ong at / New Revised ( in /Precise) (Eros1 ting & lrrigatr ~�__ ✓ As Per... Our conversati ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction¢ ❑ Comment Signature3q Inform tion E] Uses El Please return / `3 Please call: / if necessary Originator: Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, En itas, California 920243633 TEL (760) 633 -2770/F (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARRAn1er_1rans.dod03.o2.99 ,� ^ —{ I of E. INEERING SERVICES DEPART& T INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Rely Operations SubcIvision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CEP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development- Current Planning Yr O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: San Diepuito Water District- En¢ineerinp & PlanniU . Community Services — Parks &B cheess� DATE: Regarding (Finance Number DEPOSIT E TP�/MIN/DR: (Finance Number _) DEPOS A " (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN? Transmitted as following: �,/ ✓ �i•7 Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New evi Other Application: (Type) (Check) Aomments/Additional $pa a for I)�umerlt• (� 5c19 t/ le . [a'P er • ( Staff/ Consultan t/CD/Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): ZO.3 a� (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage / Water/Sewerrrrail/Park/Faci lity) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised -- - - -- Grading Plan � Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New Revised V Plan Change Description: i P) ( n e (Erosr IT9&g & Irrigan ✓ As Per... Our conversation ❑ My/your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction ❑ Comment Signature ��Information E] Uses Please return `S Please call: if necessary Originator. Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG/ARR/Intu_Trens.doc/03.02.99 I of I 1A L. _INEERING SERVICES DEPARTA. —,VT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Protects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (#1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: A J7 } �LL1'tQra /ipp/i,Yo DATE: /� Regarding (Finance Number 31J _ pOSI EE TP P/MIN/DR:— (Finance Number EPOSIT E �/i' (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final p ubmitta ended/Correct Proposed ❑ Corrected [Approve nteroftice Memo' [vvv� Blueline/Red -lined Checkprint a Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents Ii ted in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations W Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Le- Li Legal Description E) Plat ❑ Letter- Recording Fee ❑ 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ �� �� 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change / 5) Other �(/ ❑ 6) Copies to: Ad 'anal Notes: Easement re: Covenant re: Ighway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements 'JW1 ewer [�P Impact Fees 29/ Drainage ❑ Assessments Agreementre: ❑ (CD S SDWD�OMWD WD &E!r /CATV) o needed) / D pti 20,�.}a•L Improvements Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ t/ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Note: See other blacks for additional items, if any. (Public/Private (Road/Drainage/Wa ter /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) Grading PlamE ubmi Change/As -built Proposed ❑ Correc d A ov ❑ cc' ❑ Blueline/Red -lined v Checkprint � Original V Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade CJ Structural Calculations ❑ Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any, s ug a recise 3 r-pv - rosion o larlting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal uirements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inqu' a Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature 1:1 Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: �'5 &4r-a --Aqf �Y ! (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARRAnua_Trms.dod02. 11 .99 1 of I H U N S A K E R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: July 12, 2000 TO: Jeff Garami ;_, En cinitas, City of 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 2 FROM: Dave Viera PROJECT: 98 -171 (Lower North Mesa) W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up ❑ Mail THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ® Per Your Request ❑ Approval ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 Proposed Subdivision Map as submitted earlier today (6 sheets) K■]5L'J�lb� Jeff, Please call me at ext 405 with any questions or comments. Thank you. H U N S A K E R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: July 12, 2000 TO: Jeff Garami Encinitas, City of 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 FROM: Robert D'Amaro PROJECT: North Mesa Lower L_ W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files 0 Per Your Request ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 4 Copies of grading improvement plans 2 additional copies of landscape plans t Co�/ P I rz le ST. 0.1 AmE Pd'PaoUhl bZ ■7d�1�51A�lbYi ❑ Mail ❑ Approval HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES S A N D I E G O 1 N C. PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH (858) 558 -1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: July 11, 2000 TO: Tamara O'Neal Encinitas, City of 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 r FROM: Robert D'Amaro 4JjL PROJECT: North Mesa Lower ENGINEER - W.O.#: 294 -132 Ory or ENCIN CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ❑ Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Checking ® Your Review ❑ Mail © Approval NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 Signed original mylars of grading and landscape plans 2 Copies of grading and landscape plans 1 Revised HOA brush management exhibit 1 Off -site letter of permission to grade 1 Fax transmittal to fire prevention re: street name Return of all previous plancheck information including planning dept redlines and task letter S100(3D CoJel042'1'S + CHECK r-'oa 2Gco¢oiOA COMMENTS: tAp 13 Uffi J1*110tJ F-0"O l MP• C4 MDIN (^ )r D11A1 PAAE 86"ID -4:3 oti aje- s *V Pe(t Pee � u 1 cry EGIG '4500 Foa R-b r eH %"c>G 4A� H U N S A K E R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING • SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: July 12, 2000 { , TO: Tamara O'Neal I I & Encinitas, City of 505 Vulcan Avenue ENGINLC., Encinitas, CA 92024 CITY OF ENCINITAS FROM: Dave Viera PROJECT: Tract 98 -171 (Lower North Mesa) - 51h Map submittal W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up ❑ Mail THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Approval ® Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 3 Prints of proposed Map 1 Previous Engineering & CD check prints 3 Traverse talcs for revised open space & new esmts 1 New OMWD esmt & signature omission letter 1 New LCWD esmt & "Memorandum" 1 Floppy disc w /Map linework in NAD83 coords (Grid) COMMENTS: Tamara, Other support information to follow includes: Tax Cert, Sub Guarantee, & executed Covenants. Please call me at ext 405 with any questions. Thank you. EA- - JEERING SERVICES DEPARML- . C Capital Improvement Projects r Distinct Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineerng INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ET Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T---7v-�Community Development- Current Planning O Fire-Fire Prevention San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning Community Services- Parks & Beaches ATTENTION: Df ao-e � V DATE: Flo -JYDO Regarding (Finance Numbekoy UDEPOSI EE TP UP/MIN/DR: v (Finance Number EPOSI E LL N (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE APN: Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New o Revised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • (Staff /Consultant/CD /Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): 0 (Public/Private (Road/Dra inage/ W ate r /Sewer/Trail(Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised — -- - - ' - Grading Plan Check Checkprint ! A proved Copy / Original / New o evised q eZ111G, s Plan Change Description: (Mass/Rou uninary/Precise) ZN0,i (Erosion Co o lancing & Urigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review For your... Corr coon p❑ Cognment �y Signature Please return Gr" rr �t/161 /6441ease call: Originator: Copies to: ❑ Our Inquiry Our Approval ❑ E] Information ❑ Uses G�-3 if necessary 474,4 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG /ARR/lnter Trms.dod03.02.99 1 of I ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑. Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ` ICJ N► �4 D fNe� a(y-17�O6 ATTENTION: DATE: Regarding (Finance Numbe � 3g DEPO EE TP P 4IN/DR: (Finance Number DEPOS S!J " (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ,L�fj'� Subruin Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Correc d F1 Appro ed nteroffice Memo* ❑ W Checkprint F Original Certificate 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application Blueline/Reddined ❑ ❑ ❑ Approved TMrfPM ❑ Re lution of Approval C] Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Qhange- Applieatietr� t.14 l Preliminary Title Report Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other 6) Copies to:W -FO —j Copies of all documents 1' ted in preliminary title reportNesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations [v Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Addi6jonal ot� Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter ❑ Y bL G. Ail _ �— ' Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • (CD S/ FIRF /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E- F /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ S etch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ p Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ r 74, 37Q.L; I 5,7L I '+ 14 Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ I f Improvement Plan ❑ SubmittaYPlan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueljne/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items ' y. (Road/Drainage/Water /Sewer /TraWPark/Facility) Grading Plan ubmitt an Changes -built Proposed ❑ Correc A0 cc • ❑ Blueline/Red -line Checkl5rint Original ❑ d Hydraulic Calculations/Map Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations E] (Mass32 relimina Ztv✓ Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Froaion Cl;ii= ting & Irrigatio As Per... SubmittaIRKuirements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal O Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review In Use El Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ /y S ✓� ORIGINATOR: V I (Name) (Position) — 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TOO (760) 633 -2700 JSG 1ARRAntre_Trans.dod02. 11.99 1 of I HUN SAKE R & ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up ❑ Mail THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ® Approval ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 Planning Dept Redlines Grading and Landscape 1 Engineering Dept redlines and previous plancheck info 1 Revised Hydrology study 2 Revised Grading & imp. Plans 2 Revised Landscape plans 1 Set of CC &R exhibits for Diane Langager 1 Copy of street name request letter COMMENTS: TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: May W2000 TO: Tamara O'Neal Encinitas, City of 505 Vulcan Avenue C (} Q Encinitas, CA 92024 0 FROM: Robert D'Amaro w►i 8 0 `� PROJECT: North Mesa -Lower ENGIN �F EG SEE ACES w.O.u: 294 -132 Crry CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up ❑ Mail THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ® Approval ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 Planning Dept Redlines Grading and Landscape 1 Engineering Dept redlines and previous plancheck info 1 Revised Hydrology study 2 Revised Grading & imp. Plans 2 Revised Landscape plans 1 Set of CC &R exhibits for Diane Langager 1 Copy of street name request letter COMMENTS: I H U N S A K E R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER_ _ - DATE: May 1 200`0 p TO: City of Encinitas (` 505 Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 ENGINEERING SERVICES Attn.: Engineering Dept. clrr or ENCINITAS FROM: Dave Viera PROJECT: "Upper North Mesa" Final Map for Tr 98 -171 (4'h submittal) W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up ❑ Mail THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Approval Z Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 3 Prints of proposed Map 1 Previous Engineering & Planning check prints 1 Updated PR 3 Traverse calcs for revised easements in Lots 1 & 2 1 Letter from San Dieguito Water District - opinion on "easement" 1 Letter requesting approval of Street Name COMMENTS: Please call me at ext 405 with any questions or comments. Thank you. El VEERING SERVICES DEPARTM. PLANCHECK CONSULTANT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operolions Subdivision Engineering iroffic Engineering FROM: SUBDIVISON ENGINEERING DIVISION, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SECTION T JOHN POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. O 175 CALLE MAGDALENA, SUITE 101 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 ATTENTION: r.1L owle-o DATE: 3 OD Regarding (Finance Number (6O S3 FM) DEPOSI TPM/ IN/DR: /� OM (Finance Number DEPOSIT e.,4 war " (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE APN: ✓ - C Transmitted as following: ✓ Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map © 3r5 fL156m-"LBVAmended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ® Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo` ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red- lined® Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report(Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: e- Traverse Traverse Calculations ® Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: — Ltw Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ 2 oar d fad Dal . 2 S _ I q �t R �f Deferred Monumentation Letter K Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &Frr /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Road/Drainage/Water /Sewer /TraiVPark/Facility) Grading Play, ❑ SubmittaVPlan Change/As -built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc' ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations(Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass(Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion ControVPlanting & Irrigation) Pursuant to the terms of our contract with your fine, we request professional plan check services for the aforementioned plans and/or supporting documentation. If you have any comments, questions, or need additional information, please give us a call at (760) 633.2776. An 9 55 t 7ec (/ Originator: Oki-7 ,0 Position: q/. 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -26271 TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG/ARR/Pln_Cons.doe/02.11.99 1 of 1 MHUN SAKER & ASSOCIATES S A N D I E G O 1 N C. PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING TRANSMITTAL LETTER We are ®Messenger ❑Overnight ❑Mail forwarding by: Delivery No. Copies Description 3 Prints of proposed Final Map 1 2nd Eng Devel check prints (copy) 1 Revised Monumentation Bond Letter (different Surveyor) 1 Preliminary Title Report with supplement II 3 Updated Traverse Calcs for revised Lots �uu� Comments: Please call me at ext 405 with any questions or comments. This material is forwarded for: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ Other- By: Dave Viera cc 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, CA 92121 Thank you. ❑Pick -up MAR - 7� U OF ❑ Approval 9s8'\ (6i-9j 558 -4500 PH (Gl9j 558 -1414 FX �sg 7i, TO: City of Encinitas DATE: March), 2000 505 Vulcan Avenue PROJECT: North Mesa Final Map Encinitas, CA 92024 3rd submittal W.O. NO.: 294 -132 ATTN: Subdivision Engineering TRACT NO.: Enc Tr 98 -171 We are ®Messenger ❑Overnight ❑Mail forwarding by: Delivery No. Copies Description 3 Prints of proposed Final Map 1 2nd Eng Devel check prints (copy) 1 Revised Monumentation Bond Letter (different Surveyor) 1 Preliminary Title Report with supplement II 3 Updated Traverse Calcs for revised Lots �uu� Comments: Please call me at ext 405 with any questions or comments. This material is forwarded for: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ Other- By: Dave Viera cc 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, CA 92121 Thank you. ❑Pick -up MAR - 7� U OF ❑ Approval 9s8'\ (6i-9j 558 -4500 PH (Gl9j 558 -1414 FX �sg IEERINC SERVICES DEPARTM, INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Copitol improvement Projects District suppod Services Feld Operations SubdMuon Engineering Traffic Erw9neenng FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) L2 Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services CD) ❑ Office of the Director (# I) LJ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development - Current Plannine O Fire -Fire Prevention San Dieeuito Water District - Engineering & Planning 4WO"8itviar +Pilebab aAft Regarding (Finance Number 60'5Z - 6t� DEPOSIT (Finance Number 8 O - FM) DEPOSI E (Finance Number - _� DEPOSITIFEE Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map O Final Map O Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Improvement Plan ❑ Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original Check New or Revised Grading Plan M ,�Check Checkprint / / Approved Copyy / `Original /� evised iCa Jia In %n Y'L>>7 Jrp ATTENTION: 10,; l Co+ +, � DATE: Z Check TPM6IvfUP/M. m/DR: q F • 17-1 /yo�+t^ N�SK..— Lvwar „ APN: 'P I e Other Application: (Type) (Check) Coln�m�ents/Additional Space for Docu Invent: /`-'O CoP4 a;- �i v. v�1 WeK r i VG✓< ( Staff/ Consu ltant/CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD(LCWD) Sketch (if needed): O�ivate) (Road/Drainage/Water /Sewer rat Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: (Mat ou eliminary/Precise} roslon Co antis I- Irri ) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval For your... Correction ❑ Comment ® Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return Win 2 w k S Please call: 5217-1 3 if necessary Originator: ^ la.t r Kvtcl l Copies to: I le- 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024.3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 IS&ARRAnter Trans. docJ03 02 99 1 or EA LEERING SERVICES DEPARM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support services Field Operonons Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) F District Support Services (_D) E] Office of the Director (kl) ] Field Operations (FO) ❑ L T O Fire- ireFrevenhon ATTENTION: futie- Luvtaage San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning / T Community Services - Parks & Beaches DATE: ZI zg / OO Regarding (Finance Number 60-3'g - O�_K) DEPOSIT TPM��MUP/MfjJ/DR: g I I (Finance Number 038 - FM) DEPOSI E A)01+ ^ /�/�G 5k- Low e d- (Finance Number - DEPOSITIFEE APN: V^y 1-}-f l ( e Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ® f Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or evi Comments/Additional Space for Document: (77 le V- • ( Staff / Consultant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised �l Lwate) (R ^ad/Drainage /Water /Sewer rai Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: Grading Plan ® C eck Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / ei evised Plan Change Description: L.c.t..d scc�o� 7 15 ✓' (Mas ou relunmary/Precise) roslon Co anon & Irri ) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval For your... Correction ❑ Comment ® Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return tv�in 2 w k S Please call: 3 if necessary Originator: _ lrti „r MCv<ol1 Copies to: e- 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633.27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Intcr_Tfws dod03.02.99 1 of 1 EA !EERING SERVICES DEPARTML PLANCHECK CONSULTANT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations 5ubdivision Engineering Trolfic Engineering FROM: SUBDIVISON ENGINEERING DIVISION; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SECTION T JOHN POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. O 175 CALLE MAGDALENA, SUITE 101 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 ��ATTENTION: 11lINR�'Yr- � N.I.a.� DATE: a z 8 00 Regarding (Finance Number 6038 - G 1 DEPOS[ TPM(MUP/MIN/DR: �- / (Finance Number 6o3a �M�DEPOS[ E "1�0e IL. /l%et,0. — LowtV` " (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE APN: V l e. Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map E] Final Map R 9J� ROS �it3m+ 1/Amended/Cotfected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ® Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo` ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ® Checkprint ® Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other U4&c -k- f e Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title reportNesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: . I c Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Parmership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ improvements ❑ ' IREISDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/r /CATV) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ SubmittaVPlan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (J�ivate) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (R- oaad/Dra nage/Water /Sewer/4!�Dark/Facility) 6038 6tA Roti51n Grd, 311.4 ✓' Grading Plan ® mt Plan Change/As -built Proposed E] Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc' ® (paj8 (ate Gt.ed sew �+t S� ✓ Blueline/Red -lined N Checkprint E] Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mas ou Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. slon tro anting & lrrigatro Pursuant to the terms of our contract with your firm, we request professional plan check services for the aforementioned plans and/or supporting documentation. If you nts, have any comments estions, or need additional information, please give us a call at (760) 633 -2776. do'"J, fH le-e, Originator: 14 do iF Position: jr. 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Pln_Cons.doc/02. 1199 1 of I MHUN SAKER & ASSOCIATES S A N D I E G O 1 N C. PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: City of Encinitas DATE: February 26, 2000 505 Vulcan PROJECT: North Mesa Encinitas, CA 92024 W.O. NO.: 294 -132 ATTN: Tamara TRACT NO.: We are ®Messenger ❑Overnight ❑Mail ❑Pick -up forwarding by: Delivery No. Copies Description 5 Landscaping Plans 1 Check 6155, for $600 submittal fee 2 Final Map C? 1 City comments t�i 2 8 ..�cG Comments: Please revise the agreements for signature by Barratt American, Inc. as we discussed today. This material is forwarded for: ❑ Your Files ® Per Your Request ❑ Approval ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ Other - By: Ray Martin cc 10179 Huennekens Street (619) 558 -4500 PH San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 558 -1414 FX H U N S A K E R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: February 23, 2000 TO: City of Encinitas Engineering Department / x FROM: iane Ingram r Ray Martin PROJECT: North Mesa Lower - TM 98 -171 3`d PC Grading & Improvment W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ® Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up ❑ Mail THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ® Approval ❑ Checking ® Your Review ❑ NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 Previous city transmittal Sets Revised Grading & Improvement Plans Dwg. 6038 -G 5 Sets Public Storm Drain Plans Dwg. 6038 -1 D Previous plan checks: 1" Soils letter,ls` & 2nd Cost Est. Dwg. 6038 -G, 2nd Cost Est. 6038 -I, 1st & 2nd Hydrology Study, 15t & 2nd Dwg. 6038 -G COMMENTS: ' uyE GINEERINGSERVICES rITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPART /BENT Capital Improvement Projecls District Support Services FieKJ Operations Subdvision Engineering Traffic Engineering TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) Field Operations (FO) ❑ T G. S •IP• O ATTENTION: r DATE: Regarding (Finance Number (p03F) -- V4N-,, ) DEPOSI'THE) TPM ivtUP/MIN/D_ R: qP, - 17 l (Finance Number CagS$ fz&) DEPOSIT(!5� " 4� a T . �rty VQ��� osy� (Finance Number _� DEPOSITIFEE APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: �7 Fin rcel Map ❑ Final Map� G hd Check eckpr' / Approved Copy / Ong al / Certificate / Rejected Pre urinary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations Reference Maps ❑ (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: Interoffice Memorandum* ❑ Plancheck Comments* ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ '( Staff / Consultant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Sketch (if needed): Agreement re: i-1 t 4* Improvements Pvt. Rd. Maint-'� (1 qn re�lerrYv.� y�tuwk `1o058-S1 Q J Improvement Plan ❑ Check TVACLL . Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments' ❑ (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/fraiVPark(Facil ity) Intermediate Description: Gra lao Z" Check Plan Change Description: ec prinU pproved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments* ❑ (Mass/Rougt&reliminary/Precise) Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate Soil Report Hydrology Study/Map Cross Sections Exhibit: ❑ (Erosion ControVPlanting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction {❑� 1 Co ment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ S Please return 35rb rWs�,i io1.. v' a Please call: ice- if necessary Originator: I Copies to: Ll1j- . V Messenger ❑ ail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ 1 Received by: Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/Generic Trans.doc/02.11.99 I of HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES S A N D I E G O 1 N C. PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH (858) 558 -1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: October 15, 1999 TO: Tony City of Encinitas Engineering Department FROM: Diane Ingram for Ray Martin PROJECT: North Mesa Lower - Quail Hollow W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: ❑ Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ® Per Your Request ❑ Checking ❑ Your Review NO. COPIES 1 COMMENTS: U1 *Y■101i11■W Revised Hydrology Study ❑ Mail ❑ Approval �NG`NEEO f 4NC Nit PS 5 G\t� We are sending an additional Hydrology Report to go with our submittal of 10/14/99. If you need anything further, please call. E NEERING SERVICES DEPARTA. T Capital Improvement Projects Distncl Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering traffic Engineering PLANCHECK CONSULTANT TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: SUBDIVISON ENGINEERING DIVISION; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SECTION T JOHN POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. O 175 CALLE MAGDALENA, SUITE 101 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 ATTENTION: JCrew kU e- DATE: IO IS Regarding (Finance Number 60145 - >=M) DEPOSI E TPM�/M1JP��/AMA1N/DR: (Finance Number 6038 - ILK)DEPOSIT E �1o1-vF% rv�GS.L_ flower (Finance Number - _) DEPOSIT/FEE APN: vI h P1 e Transmitted as following: ud ✓ Comments./Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map C] Final Map ® 811 N�VAmended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck Proposed ® Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ® Checkprint ® Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/fPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other C�t�ole- (prC,,.i- �oc S _ ZI Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: (e Traverse Calculations ES Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ AVditional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers El Property Appraisal E] Utility Letter* N }D (14 d • t2 e o r r , vto N OT (p o ; l vtcet ac( Deferred MonumentationLetter ® Agency Letter: ❑ Cr _��� ,�. D. L(� yo //S An 4-. / Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ ' in Easement re: Covenant re: ' (CD /CS/FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD & AT Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submitta[/Plan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ ubl' �ivate) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Rr^ ainage/Water /Sewer rai ark/Facility) Grading Plan v,d <42=4i;PPlan Change/As -built Proposed & Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc' ❑ Blueline/Red -lined o Checkprint ® Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations /Map ® Cost Estimate MX H Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rougl tell - /Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. qZ52gon Con laming & Irrigation) Pursuant to the terms of our contract with your Lan, we request professional plan check services for the aforementioned plans and/or supporting documentation If you have any comments, questions, or need additional information, please give us a call at (760) 633 -2776. r— TG Originator: oh o55 t Position:y/yr. r- 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SGIARR/Pln Cons.dod02.11.99 I of I toyJ MHUi-4SAKER & ASSOCIATES S A N D I E G O 1 N C. PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING TRANSMITTAL LETTER We are forwarding by: No. Copies 3 1 1 it fd ®Messenger ❑Overnight ❑Mail Delivery Description Prints of proposed Final Map 1s' Eng & Comm Devel check prints including traverse calcs Monumentation Bond Letter Signature Omission letters from Daniels Cablevision ra G Updated Traverse Calcs � ❑Pick -up Comments: We anticipate change of vesting to Barratt American Inc. prior to Map recordation. We have revised all lots to account for revisions to street width. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at ext 405. Thank you. This material is forwarded for: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Approval ® Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ Other- By: Dave Viera cc 10179 Huennekens Street (619) 558 -4500 PH San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 558 -1414 FX /5 TO: City of Encinitas DATE: October , 1999 505 Vulcan Avenue PROJECT: North Mesa Final Map Encinitas, CA 92024 2nd submittal W.O. NO.: 294 -132 ATTN: Subdivision Engineering TRACT NO.: Enc Tr 98 -171 We are forwarding by: No. Copies 3 1 1 it fd ®Messenger ❑Overnight ❑Mail Delivery Description Prints of proposed Final Map 1s' Eng & Comm Devel check prints including traverse calcs Monumentation Bond Letter Signature Omission letters from Daniels Cablevision ra G Updated Traverse Calcs � ❑Pick -up Comments: We anticipate change of vesting to Barratt American Inc. prior to Map recordation. We have revised all lots to account for revisions to street width. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at ext 405. Thank you. This material is forwarded for: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Approval ® Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ Other- By: Dave Viera cc 10179 Huennekens Street (619) 558 -4500 PH San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 558 -1414 FX H U N S A K E R& ASSOCIATES 10179 Huennekens Street r S A N D I E G O I N C San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING (858) 558-1414 FX TRANSMITTAL LETTER DATE: October 14, 1999 TO: Jeremy Riddle City of Encinitas Engineering Department FROM: Diane Ingram for Ray Martin PROJECT: Encinitas Ranch North Mesa - Lower - T.M. 98 -171 W.O. #: 294 -132 CC: WE ARE FORWARDING BY: 0 Messenger ❑ Overnight Delivery ❑ Pick -up ❑ Mail THIS MATERIAL IS FORWARDED FOR: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ® Approval ❑ Checking ® Your Review ❑ NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 2 Revised Grading & Private Improvement Plans - Dwg. 6038 -GR 1 Revised Hydrology Study 2 Revised Engineer's Cost Estimate 1 Letter to Blair Knoll addressing plan check comments dated 1011199 Previous plan checks: 1st Dwg. 6038 -GR, 1St Soils Letter, 1st Hydrology 1St Planning Comments, 1st Engineer's Cost Estimate 1 Check in the amount of $975.00 plan check fee — 1 improvement sheet COMMENTS: Im i 1NEERING SERVICES DEPAR7. VT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects Districl Support Services Feld Operations subdivision Engineering Traft Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ® Traffic Engineering (7'E) O District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director (Ill) . ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T 0ki- .^,[4Et2 4, As&,=A Ai Le. We O SASt DLELr .lam A NTION: 1i2J.Y 1�AIZTIt 1 (plot sis- c;,Oe> DATE � A..� /q4 Regarding (Finance Number &OSS -esR 1 DEPOSIT TPM/ A01UP/MW/DR &- (i I (Finance Number - [DEPOSIT me. 94*LGt4 No. M'_ L_ (Finance Number - DEPOSIT APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ® 1 •T Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Frtetlminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ® Reference Maps Comments/Additional Space for Document: Interoffice Memorandum' 2? Plancheck Comments* Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ * t.ss ao2 sTarts rrut tt 0 tN _ #- -MAutEt--:t La_ -cr1 V Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ El Assessments E) Agreement re: El Improvements ❑ Pvt Rd. Maint. ❑ A-TM tatS.s 60u.tN.1 k5l iTS • (Staff/Consultant/ SD C ) Sketch (if needed): G S ©Y I Nt/ 1 + % bli Improvement plan ❑ Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments' ❑ ad/Dranc �eJWater /Sewexf�l/P�rk/Facility) Intermediate Description: �� sr Gf�' �RVLGs,% ■ � ( Check h� xpproved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments • cw�wwt�t tTS R-f -%Jy -' . cry trCT,'� Plan Change Description: i-IYGRULl.XAY STV OK A —s vJ0-r �- t) ou ise) osion C noting & In Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ® Soil Report ❑ Hydrology Study/Map Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ As Per... Our conversation ❑ My/your inquiry ❑ Our Review ® Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction © Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses O Please return 'Z 'Sluts autA IES I C LttPRL►J<S Please call: 't(aO Ce3-21 9 -lRSp1 if necessary Originator. - r- W-WAAY Q-IDDt.C- Copies to: F ( Le V Messenger ❑ Mail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Outer ❑ 1 Received by: Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSGIARR/Generic Tra .doc/02.11.99 I of I E . _ /NEERING SERVICES DEPARTA, _ , T Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) 0 Traffic Engineering (TE) C] District Support Services (_D) EJ Office of the Director (#I) Field Operations (FO) 0 T Community Development - Current Planning (� O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: 1Jol y G �o r Q San Dieeuito Water District- Eneineerinz & Planning Community Services – Parks & Beaches DATE: Regarding (Finance Number 6_0L_37 DEPOSIT/ko TP P/MIN/DR: 'l(Finance Number L! DEPOSIT Aloe�. �- (� / Lowe r (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: VK —,6 Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map EJ Final Map PT Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / t4ew r Revised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff / Consultant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/ Water /Sewer /frai VPark/Faci I ity) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plal Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Grading Plan ® �5 t� ___CbLeck Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / ew or Revised Plan Change Description: (Massre I im inary/Prec ise) ston lanting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation My /your inquiry Our Review Our Inquiry E] Our Approval For your... Correction ❑ Comment 0 Signature E] Information E] Uses E) Please return v✓ /ln Z w e s k 5 Please call: --- :Z 7-I'l 3 if necess ary Originator: Air Kwolf Copies to: i LG 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92020 -3633 TEL (760) 633 - 2770 /FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1 SGARR, Inler Trues doc /03 02 99 1 of I & INEERING SERVICES DEPARTA- T Capital Mnprovemenl Projects \ District Support Services Field Operations Svbdvision Engineering Traffic Engineenng INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) C] Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) District Support Services (_D) E] Office of the Director ( #1) Field Operations (FO) T Community Development- Current Planning 1 (I ( O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: (? t I ( San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning �/ / 9 Community Services — Parks & Beaches DATE: - Regarding (Finance Number 6037 - _W) DEPOSITA (Finance Number 603 �9 - G �) DEPOSIT (Finance Number - DEPOSITIFEE Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map EJ Final Map a 5 � t,-- Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / llew r Revised Improvement Plan F1 Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised - ---- --- --- - -- -- - -- -- ------------------------------------- Grading Plan [� �5 ✓ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / eor Revised TPI P/M[N/DR: q 2 - I --�t / rya Il /r ri% Lower APN: Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff / Consultant /CD/Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/ W ater /Sewer/Trai VPark/Facility) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: (MassqG; /Preliminary/Precise) ton lanting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry Our Approval [B For your... Correction Comment 2 Signature E] Information Uses Please return v✓het 2 we `k 5 Please call 2 3 if necessary Originator: Air Kwol( Copies to: i (B 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISC/ARRAnter Trans . doc /03.02.99 I of 1 E, NEERING SERVICES DEPARTA- T PLANCHECK CONSULTANT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital kmprovemeot Projects District Support services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: SUBDIVISON ENGINEERING DIVISION; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SECTION T JOHN POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. O 175 CALLE MAGDALENA, SUITE 101 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 ATTENTION: gjJ l 4z-5 /d! DATE: Regarding (Finance Number 6033 - FM) DEPOSIT TPJMI /Ov1UP/MIN/DR: Ci (g -17/ (Finance Number O ` S - DEPOSIT " /�e -S°� /.] or'N.� L p wG ✓' " (Finance Number - DEPOSIT/FEE APN: G Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ® SIIMM"OAmended/Corrected Comments/Additional Space for Document l) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ® Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo• ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ® Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TMfTPM P Resolution of Approval y�ay Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ® Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ -�� �, le-� 5) Other'7ew er `S +Vd `4 Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed,® 6) Copies to: �-; le Traverse Calculations Z Reference Maps ® Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer C] Park El Impact Fees El •�'CS I SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &EIT /CATV) Sketch (t needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blue] ine/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Road/Drainage/Wa ter /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) t/ Grading Plan ® / � 5� I /Plan Change /As -built Proposed Ca Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc Blueline/Red -lined ® Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ 1.f4Jf,,r Hydraulic Calculations/Map ® Cost Estimate �] Soil Report S Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mas ou reliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( lanting & Irrigation) Pursuant to the terms of our contract with your firm, we request professional plan check services for the aforementioned plans and/or supporting documentation. If you have any comments, questZ�2 d additional information, please give us a call at (760) 633 -2776. �, Originator: / ✓h �aSS l Posi tion: � /, �l , 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760)333 -2627 /TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/Pln_Cons.dod02.11.99 I of 1 HUiNSAKER & ASSOCIATES S A N D I E G O 1 N C. PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: City of Encinitas DATE: June 14, 1999 505 Vulcan Avenue PROJECT: North Mesa Final Map Encinitas, CA 92024 1st submittal W.O. NO.: 294 -132 ATTN: Subdivision Engineering TRACT NO.: Enc Tr 98 -171 We are ®Messenger [I]Overnight ❑Mail ❑Pick -up forwarding by: Delivery No. Copies Description 3 Prints of proposed Final Map 2 Prints of Tentative Map 2 Conditions of Approval 2 Prelim Title Report, Vesting Doc, encumbering esmt docs 3 Traverse Calcs 1 Reference Maps 1 Check for planchecking fees Comments: We anticipate change of vesting to Barratt American Inc. prior to Map recordation. We will show proposed Open Space /HOA esmt within Lots 1 -6 after approval of grading design as necessary. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at ext 405. Thank you. This material is forwarded for: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Approval ® Checking ❑ Your Review ❑ Other- By: Dave Viera cc 10179 Huennekens Street (619) 558 -4500 PH San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 558 -1414 FX HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES S A N D I E G O 1 N C. PLANNING ■ ENGINEERING ■ SURVEYING TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: City of Encinitas DATE: June 15, 1999 Engineering Department PROJECT: Enc. Ranch North Mesa - Lower 1st PC Grading & Improvements W.O. NO.: 294 -132 ATTN: Jeff Garami TRACT NO.: TM 98 -171 We are ®Messenger ❑Overnight ❑Mail ❑Pick -up forwarding by: Delivery No. Copies Description 5 Prints Grading & Improvement Plans 2 Engineer's Cost Estimate 2 Soils Report Letter 2 Hydrology Study 1 Sewer Study 1 Application Plancheck fee Comments: This material is forwarded for: ❑ Your Files ❑ Per Your Request ® Checking ® Your Review ❑ Other- By: Diane for Ray Martin cc. 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, CA 92121 © Approval (619) 558 -4500 PH (619) 558 -1414 FX PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING HUNSAKEK &ASSOCIATES A N D I E G O, 1 N C. December 11. 2000 IRVINE RIVERSIDE City of Encinitas SAN DIEGO 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Pad Certification Project: North Mesa TM 98 -171 DWG. 6038 -G Lots: 6 and 15 Owner: Barratt American 2035 Corte Del Nogal Suite 160 Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 431 -0800 The grading for the building pad on the above referenced lots has been completed to an elevation in conformance with the approved grading plan. The condition of the pad at the time of our field survey was bare earth with no drainage swales or vegetation. Grading of manufactured slope adjacent to the pads was not completed. Sincerely, 5 y\Daniel P. Smith L.S. 6854 Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. " �y D DAVE HAMMAR * No. LS 6e54 LE% WILLIMAN Exp. 9 -Sc)-04 ALISA VIALPANDO N .v9T FOF CAUV 10179 Huennekens St. San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH 1858) 558 -1414 F % w .HunsakerSD.com V6 1r h.W294V0WW85.Ux Info ®HunsakerSD.com w o. 0280.132 City of Encinitas North Mesa (w.o. 0294 -132) December 11, 2000 Page 2 Lot No Pad Elevation 6 316.2 15 315.9 v9:ir x:wzeaQ000 &doc w. o. 02W32 PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING IRVINE RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO DAVE HAMMAR JACK HILL LEX WILLIMAN ALISA VIALPANDO 10179 Huennekens St. San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 5SB -4500 PH (858) 558 -1414 F X ..hunsaker.com Info®HunsakerSD.com HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES A N D I I: G O, 1 N C. November 13, 2000 City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Pad Certification Project: North Mesa TM 98 -171 DWG. 6038 -G Lots: 1 through 5, 7 through 14, and 16 Owner: Barratt American 2035 Corte Del Nogal Suite 160 Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 431 -0800 The grading for the building pad on the above referenced lots has been completed to an elevation in conformance with the approved grading plan. The condition of the pad at the time of our field survey was bare earth with no drainage swales or vegetation. Grading of manufactured slope adjacent to the pads was not completed. Sincerely, Daniel P. Smith L.S. 6854 Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. �p LA P. PSV9 P gay��y FO 9 * No. LS 6854 Exp• 9 TFOR CALNVtO VB:ab k:WY11200 I E w.o. 02W32 City of Encinitas North Mesa (w.o. 0294 -132) November 13, 2000 Page 2 Lot No Pad Elevation 1 321.6 2 319.2 3 318.9 4 318.1 5 317.3 7 314.9 8 314.7 9 313.9 10 312.7 11 312.6 12 314.8 13 313.6 14 315.3 16 317.3 Ma R.W24112W0d9I. w.o. 0244132 Sent By: GEOTECHNICS INC; 858 536 8311 ; Nov -13 -00 8:46; Page 1 Geotechnics Incorporated 9245 Activity Road, Suite 103 San Diego, CA 92126 -4442 Phone: (858) 536 -1000 FAX: (858) 536 -8311 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Mr. Richard Sanchez DATE: November 13, 2000 Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 RECARDING: North Mcsa -Lower Carlsbad, California 92009 PROJECT NO,: 0517- 003 -01 We are transmitting the following attached items by: FAX X Mail _ Express Mail _ FAX No.: 760/929 -6433 Messenger _ Client Pick -Up Number of Pages FAXed : 10 including transmittal letter Copies Date Description 1 10/13/00 interim As- Graded Report, North Mesa - lower, Lots 1 through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and L.ot 16 1 10/16/00 Foundation Plan Review, North Mesa - Lower, Lots 1 through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and Lot 16 Remarks: Please do not hesitate to call us if you have any questions or need a clarifying letter. Signed: Dick Rob s Copy To: REV 1189] Sent By: GEOTECHNICS INC; 858 536 8311 ; Nov -13 -00 8:46; Page 2 =G eotechnics Incorporated Prinrip"K: Anthony F. Belf"t Michael P. Imbrigho W. Lee Vanderhumt October 13, 2000 Barratt American Incorporated Project No. 0517- 003 -01 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 Document No. 0 -1082 Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Mr. Bruce Mezan SUBJECT: INTERIM AS- GRADED REPORT North Mesa - Lower, Lots 1 through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and Lot 16 Encinitas Ranch Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have prepared this letter presenting our conclusions regarding the as- graded conditions of tots 1 through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and Lot 16. An As- Graded report will be prepared once the grading of Lots 6 and 15 are completed. This letter includes recolmnendations regarding foundation design for single - family structures. The conclusions presented herein are based on the observation and testing services provided by Geotechnics Incorporated during the earthwork construction of the subject site. Our services did not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees, or agents. A final report presenting the results of our observations and testing of the overall site grading is being prepared. In general, the grading of the lots included the removal of loose surficial soils to expose competent formational materials and the placement of compacted fill to approximate plan grade. Lots 13, 14, and 16 were excavated to finish grade. In general, the fill consisted of clayey sand. The soil was placed generally in lifts approximately 8 inches thick, moisture conditioned, and compacted by scrapers and a rubber -tired compactor. The fill thicknesses beneath each pad are presented in the attached Table 1. In our opinion, the grading and compaction of the fill material underlying the subject lot was performed in general accordance with the intent of the project geotechnical recommendations, and 9245 Actistty lid., Ste. 103 • Jan Viego, Caliroraia 92126 Phone 1858) 536- ION • Fax (a59) 5364311 �� Sent By: GEOTECHNICS INC; 858 536 8311 ; Nov -13 -00 8:46; Page 3 Barratt American tncorporatal Protect No- 0517.003 -01 October 13, 2000 Damumcnl Nv. 0 -1082 Page No. 2 the requirements of the City of Encinitas. The conclusions presented herein are based on the observations and testing performed through October 6, 2000. No representations are made as to the quality or extent of materials not observed. Samples of the near surface soil were collected from the subject lots for expansion index and soluble sulfate content testing. The tests were conducted in general accordance with ASTM D4829 and ASTM D516, respectively. The results of the expansion index tests are also presented in the attached Table 1. Each of the soluble sulfate tests indicated less than 0.10 percent by weight, indicating negligible sulfate exposure. However, severe sulfate contents may exist in the near surface soils. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are based on the expected existing subsurface conditions. They are generally consistent with methods typically used in southern California. Other alternatives may be available. The foundation recommendations presented herein should not be considered to preclude more restrictive criteria of governing agencies or by the structural engineer. The design of the foundation system should be performed by the project structural engineer based on current code requirements and accepted engineering practices. WITMkMT =11 W1111 Edge Moisture Variation, em Center Lift: 5.3 feet Edge Lift: 2.6 feet Differential Swell, Y. Center Lift: 1.7 inches Edge Lift: 0.6 inches Differential Settlement: 3/4 -inch Allowable Bearing Capacity: 2,000 lbs/ft at slab subgrade Geotechnics Incorporated Sent By: GEOTECHNICS INC; Barratt American Incorporated October 13. 2000 Conventional Foundations 858 536 8311 ; Nov -13 -00 8:46; Page 4 Pmject No. 0517 -003 -01 Document No. 0.1082 Page No. 3 Allowable Soil Bearing. 2,500 lbs/fi2 (allow a one -third increase for short-term wind or seismic loads) Minimum Footing Width: 12 inches Minimum Footing Depth: 18 inches below lowest adjacent soil grade Minimum Slab fhickness: 5Y: inches Differential Settlement: 3 /4-inch Lateral loads may be resisted by friction and by the passive resistance of the supporting soils. A coefficient of friction of 0.3 may be used between the bottom of footings and the supporting soils. The passive resistance of the fill soils may be assumed to be equal to the pressure developed by a fluid with a density of 300 lbsA'. A one -third increase in the passive value may be used for wind or seismic loads. The passive resistance of the soils may be combined with the frictional resistance without reduction in evaluating the total lateral resistance. The following CBC seismic parameters may be used for design of the proposed buildings: Seismic Zone Factor, Z. 0.4 Seismic Source Type: B Soil Profile Type: Sr Seismic Coefficients, C,,: 0.40Na Cy: 0.56N, Near - Source Factors, Na: 1.0 N�: 1.2 Footings adjacent to slopes should be founded at a depth such that the distance between the lower outside edge of the footing and the face of any slope is at least 8 feet. Geotechnics Incorporated Sent By: GEOTECHNICS INC; 858 538 8311 ; Nov -13 -00 8:47; Page 5 Barran American Incorporated project No. 0517 -003 -01 October 13, 2000 Dnuul ent No. 0 -1092 Page No. 4 Concrete slabs constructed on soil ultimately cause the moisture content to rise in the underlying soil. Typical moisture protection used in southern California for interior, on -grade slabs consists of 2 inches of clean sand covered by a 20 -mil moisture barrier covered by another 2- inches of clean sand. The sand should have a minimum sand equivalent of at least 50 when tested in accordance with ASTM test method D2419. It has been our experience that such systems will transmit from approximately 6 to 12 pounds of moisture per 1000 square feet per day. It is our opinion that soil conditions do not exist that would preclude the use of the indicated moisture protection on this project- It should be recognized, however, that this system relies entirely on the integrity of the visqueen membrane. Accordingly, care should be taken to protect the visqueen against all punctures and to provide adequate overlap at all seams. If the above discussed moisture transmission is considered to be excessive for the types of floor coverings planned, further protection can be realized by adding a capillary break layer in accordance with the following alternative: 2 inches of clean sand (sand equivalent of 30 or more), over 10 mil. plastic sheeting, over 4 inches of minus 3/8 -inch crushed rock over subgrade. Another alternative would be to place a moisture barrier with a thickness greater than 20 mil directly on the subgrade, covered with at least 2 inches of clean sand. The moisture barrier should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's requirements, and any joints or laps should be throughly sealed in accordance with the manufacturer's requirements to provide a thorough seal. The wrtcrete should have a low water - cement ratio of no greater than 0.5, and be moist -cured for at least 5 days in accordance with the methods recommended by the American Concrete Institute. Additionally, the project architect and/or a waterproofing consultant should evaluate the moisture barrier requirements based on the anticipated floor coverings and proposed use. We also recommend that a special registered inspector test and inspect the concrete placement and slab construction to confirm the recommendations herein are implemented in the field. The type of cement used should be based on the results of sulfate content testing of finish grade soils as reported herein, and the design criteria of the 1998 California Building Code. It should be noted Geotechnirs Incorporated Sent By: GEOTECHNICS INC; 858 536 8311 ; Nov -13 -00 8:47; Page 6/10 Barrart American Incorporated Prolecl No. 0517.003 -01 Ouober 13, 2000 Document No. 0-1082 Pagc Nu. 5 that soluble sulfate in the irrigation water supply, and/or the use of fertilizer may cause the sulfate content in the surficial soils to increase with time. This may result in a higher sulfate exposure than that indicated by the test results reported herein. Studies have shown that the use of improved cements in the concrete, and a low water - cement ratio will improve the resistance of the concrete to sulfate exposure. RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls should be backfiiled with material exhibiting a low expansion potential, less than 20 as evaluated by UBC Standard 29 -2 (Expansion Index test). Materials exhibiting a greater expansion potential would increase the lateral pressures beyond design values. The following design parameters for earth retaining structures are provided assuming bacUll with a low potential for expansion. Equivalent Fluid Pressure with level backftll: 30 lbs/ft Equivalent Fluid Pressure with 2:1 sloping backfiil: 43 lbs/ft Allowable Soil Bearing: 2,500 lbs /ft Passive Pressure: 300 lbs/ft Coefficient of Friction, soil to concrete: 0.3 The equivalent fluid pressures are based on the active soil state, assuming the walls are free to rotate at least 1 percent of the wall height. The pressures do not include surcharge loads, hydrostatic pressure, or seepage forces. Walls should be fully drained to prevent hydrostatic or seepage pressures. Wall drain details are given in the attached Figure 1, Retaining Wall Drain Details. When combining passive pressure and friction for passive resistance, the passive pressure should be reduced by one - third. It has been our experience that site retaining walls frequently develop high moisture or free water in the backfili due to heavy irrigation that commonly occurs in subdivisions. This leads to problems such as efflorescence on the face of the wall and spalling of stucco finishes. Geotechnics Incorporated Sent By: GEOTECHNICS INC; 858 538 8311 Nov -13 -00 8:47; Page 7 /10 BerrxLL Amcricxn IncorpornlcJ Project No. 0517 -003 -01 October 13, 2000 Document No. eo Page N No. . 6 6 To decrease such problems, it is suggested that walls be moisture - proofed on the positive side in addition to having a back - drain. Backfilling retaining walls with expansive soils can increase lateral pressures well beyond the active or at -rest pressures indicated above. We recommend that retaining walls be backfilled with free draining, granular soil having an Expansive Index of 20 or less. The backfill area should include the zone defined by a 1:1 sloping plane, back from the base of the wall. Retaining wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction, based on Modified Proctor density. Backfill should not be placed until walls have achieved adequate structural strength. Heavy compaction equipment which could cause distress to walls should not be used. The recommendations presented herein were provided using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional opinions included in this letter. If you have any questions regarding the information presented, we would be happy to meet with you. We appreciate this opportunity to provide professional services. GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Dick Roberts Project Geologist It . 6 Distribution: (4) Addressee Attachments: Table 1 - Lot Subsurface Conditions Figure 1 - Wall Drain Details Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. C 40333 Principal Geotechnics incorporated C44OS33 "t i * Ems• CIVIV Barratt American Incorporated TABLE 1 Project No. 0517-003-01 North Mesa -Lower LOT SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Document No. 0 -1082 October 13, 2000 LOT NUMBER GREATER FILL TIUCKNESS LESSER FILL THICKNESS DIFFERENTIAL FILL TIIICKNESS EXPANSION INDEX EXPANSION POTENTIAL 1 15 7 8 0 Very Low 2 13 3 10 0 Very Low 3 17 8 9 0 Very Low 4 16 6 8 0 Very Low 5 8 3 5 0 Very Low 6 incorr late 7 3 2 1 0 Very Low 8 30 8 22 0 Very Low 9 50 10 40 0 Very Low 10 50 10 40 0 Very Low 11 12 6 6 0 Very Low 12 8 2 6 0 Ve Low 13 1 0 1 0 Very Low 14 1 0 1 0 Very Low 15 incomplete 16 1 0 1 D Very Low Sent By: GEOTECHNICS INC; 858 536 8311 ; Nov -13 -00 8:48; Page 9/10 DAMP - PROOFING OR WATER- PROOFING AS REQUIRFO ROCK AND FABRIC ALTERNATIVE .f+`OMPAC.fED-"- BAGKmLL• ;t MINUS 314 -INCH CRUSHED ROCK ENVELOPED IN FILTER FABRIC z` *, APPROVED D S MILAR)C 4NP, OR \? 4-INCH DIAM. PVC PERFORATED PIPE DAMP-PROOFING OR WATER- PROOFING AS REQUIRED \ GEOCOMPOSITE PANEL DRAIN �V. = ".COMPACTED. I!a BACKFILL• . 8 =' 1 CU, FT. PER LINEAR FOOT OF MINUS 314 -INCH CRUSHED ROCK ENVELOPED IN FILTER FABRIC 4 -INCH DIAM. PVC PERFORATED PIPE PANEL DRAIN ALTERNATIVE WEEP -HOLE ALTERNATIVE 12 -INCH MINIMUM WEEP -HOLE ALTERNATIVE NOTES 1) Perforated pipe should outlet through a solid pipe to a free gravity outfall. Perforated pipe and outlet pipe should have a fall of at least 1 %. 2) As an alternative to the perforated pipe and outle(. weep -holes may be constructed. Weep-holes should be at least 2 inches in diameter, spaced no greater than B feet, and be located just above grade at the bottom of wall. 3) Filter fabric should consist of Mirafi 140N, Supac 5NP, Amoco 4599, or similar approved fabric Filter fabric should be overlapped at least 6-inches. 4) Geocomposite panel drain should consist of Miradrain 6000, J -DRain 400, Supac DS-15, or approved similar product 5) Drain installation should be observed by the geotechnical consultant prior to backfilling. Project No. 0517 -003-01 Geotechnics Document No 0-1082 `Incorporated WALL DRAIN DETAILS FIGURE 1 V)rarttugu;orewraw�m1wm nev. v" Sent By: GEOTECHNICS INC; 858 538 8311 ; Nov -13 -00 8:48; Page 10/10 �. G e o t e c h n i c s Incorporated Primlpak: Antbony F. Betrast Mkbsd P. lmbewio W'. I" Vauderhumt October 16, 2000 Barran American Incorporated Project No. 0517- 003 -01 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 Document No. 0 -1087 Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Mr. Brace Mezan SUBJECT: FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW North Mesa- Lower, Lots 1 through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and Lot 16 F.,ncinitas Ranch References: (1) Specialty Steel, 1998, Barratt American Quail Ridge, Encinitas, CA: Ref. No. 1623, 16 sheets. (2) Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, Interim AS- Graded Report, North Mesa- Lower, Lots 1 through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and Lot 16, Encinitas Ranch: Project No. 0517- 003-01, Document No. 0 -1082, dated October 13. Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the geoteehnical aspects of the foundation plans (Reference 1) for conformance with the referenced geotechnical recommendations (Reference 2). In our opinion, the plans conform with our recommendations. If you have any questions regarding the information presented, we would be happy to meet with you. We appreciate this opportunity to provide professional services. Dick rtb s Project Geologist FITIVEWIC Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. C 40333 Principal Distribution: (4) Addressee - 9245 Activity Rd., Sm 103 • Jan Mee% C"oruin Phuoe (858) 5361000 • Fax (859) 5368311 F. C040333 OF ENCINITAS RANCH/ QUAIL RIDGE H.O.A. BRUSH MANAGEMENT AREA EXHIBIT 19 I 10 I 11 1 12 9 0 /� I 8 I 13_J qW II I11 /� J 17 r II 14 1 7 I = 1 v 16 I I 5 I -- 4 I 3 2 1 8 I fl � LEGEND INDICATES H.O.A. COMMON MAINTENANCE AREA LOTS 19 15 AN OPEN SPACE LOTS. M L'L@I`LfA1 W®fITN.OABMAMYO Lr:YY:1W PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING IRVINE LAS VEGAS RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES S A N D I E G O. I N C . March 3, 2000 MAR - T X101 Blair Knoll , 'f -Avl: s City of Encinitas Eh,1 rl iY Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -171 - SURVEY MONUMENTATION ESTIMATE AND BOND Dear Mr. Knoll, The cost of deferred monumentation for City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -171 will be $4,000. A bond for that amount will be forthcoming from the developer. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Thank you. Very truly yours, DAVE HAMMAR JACK HILL 1 LEX wILL1MAN Dana Michael Segui L.S.6t15 Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. 10179 Huennekens 51. Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 558-4500 PH (619) 558 -1414 F www.hunsakeE.com Info ®Huns kerSD.com (v QO Lp N D So� �r7 AE4 S L� F � O Q J ° L. S. 6215 Z 1, \ Exp. 3/31/02/ j DVen m:lpmtassinpwonumenulion Isnen="Wwe 01 dm . 2Bi132 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR BONDING PURPOSES ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA -QUAIL HOLLOW TM NO. 98 -171 DWG #6038 -G CITY OF ENCINITAS n "PRIVATE" IMPROVEMENTS COST SUMMARY --------------- ---------------- ------------- TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE (Private) ................. TOTAL GRADING & Private Surface Improvements..... $28,238 $462,770 G R A N D T 0 T A L ......................... $491,008 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES, INC 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, Ca 92121 Tel: (619) 558 -4500 Prepared by: Terry Allbritain W.O.# 294 -132 northmesag Revised: Oct. 4, 1999 Date: June 15, 1999 Pagel PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR BONDING PURPOSES ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA -QUAIL HOLLOW TM NO. 98 -171 DWG #6038 -G CITY OF ENCINITAS ITEM STORM DRAINAGE (Private) 18" RCP 24" RCP 36" RCP 42" RCP 48" RCP CLEANOUT TYPE A -4 CURB INLET TYPE B CURB INLET TYPE B -2 CURB INLET TYPE A -2 CONNECT TO EXISTING LINE HEAD WALL /WINGWALL D -34 PRIVATE DRAIN INLET CATCH BASIN TYPE F 6" CL II BASE TRAIL PLUG STORM DRAIN END RIP RAP SUB -TOTAL CONTINGENCY (10%) TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE UNIT QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL -------- ----- -- ------- - --- 179 LF @$ 84 = $15,036 LF @$ 95 = $0 LF @$ 130 = $0 LF@$ 150 = $0 LF @$ 160 = $0 1 EA @$ 3,790 = $3,790 EA @$ 3,500 = $0 1 EA @$ 3,675 = $3,675 EA @$ 3,500 = $0 EA @$ 500 = $0 1 EA @$ 2,420 = $2,420 EA @$ 500 = $0 EA @$ 3,400 = $0 SF @$ 0.85 = $0 EA @$ 300 = $0 5 CY @$ 150 = $750 $25,671 $2,567 $28,238 W.O.# 294 -132 northmesag Paget PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR BONDING PURPOSES ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA -QUAIL HOLLOW TM NO. 98 -171 DWG #6038 -G CITY OF ENCINITAS UNIT ITEM QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL ---- - - - ----- - -- -- --------- ---- GRADING & Private Surface Improvements ROUGH GRADING 60,000 CYO$ 4.10 = $246,000 RETAINING WALLS 780 SF ®$ 28.00 = $21,840 CONCRETE DRAINAGE DITCH 1,356 LFO$ 13.75 = $18,645 SPLASH WALL 10 LF$@ 20.00 = $200 3" AC/ 6" AB PAVEMENT 23,650 SF ®$ 2.15 = $50,848 6" CURB & GUTTER 1,367 LF ®$ 13.75 = $18,796 SILT FENCE 4,000 LF @$ 7.50 = $30,000 CURB OUTLET D -27 15 EA ®$ 325.00 = $4,875 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 1,698 SF @$ 4.20 = $7,132 SANDBAGS 1,920 EA @$ 2.50 = $4,800 CROSS GUTTER 1,243 SFO$ 5.00 = $6,215 HYDROSEED SLOPES 113,500 SF ®$ 0.10 = $11,350 SUB -TOTAL $420,700 CONTINGENCY (108) $42,070 TOTAL GRADING $462,770 W.O.# 294 -132 northmesag Page3 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR BONDING PURPOSES ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA -LOWER TM NO. 98 -171 DWG #6038 -Ii }, CITY OF ENCINITAS "Public" IMPROVEMENTS COST SUMMARY TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE (Public) .................. TOTAL GRADING & Private Surface Improvements..... ENGiNEERiN CITY OF E $8,576 na G R A N D T O T A L ......................... $8,576 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES, INC 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, Ca 92121 Tel: (619) 558 -4500 Prepared by: Terry Allbritain W.O.# 294 -132 northmesai O �LOFESSIO\ �Op1D 1. 4f � �y9Q /p NO. 4�7p'" OF Cpy1FT;-40 Date: Oct.5,1999 Pagel i PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR BONDING PURPOSES ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA -LOWER TM NO. 98 -171 DWG #6038 -I CITY OF ENCINITAS ITEM STORM DRAINAGE (Private) 18" RCP 24" RCP 36" RCP 42" RCP 48" RCP CLEANOUT TYPE A -4 CURB INLET TYPE B CURB INLET TYPE B -2 CURB INLET TYPE A -2 CONNECT TO EXISTING LINE HEAD WALL /WINGWALL D -34 PRIVATE DRAIN INLET CATCH BASIN TYPE F REMOVE ENERGY DISSAPTOR PLUG STORM DRAIN END RIP RAP SUB -TOTAL CONTINGENCY (10 %) TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE W.O.# 294 -132 northmesai UNIT QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL 39 LF@$ 84 = $3,276 LFO$ 95 = $0 LFO$ 130 = $0 LF ®$ 150 = $0 LF ®$ 160 = $0 EA ®$ 3,790 = $0 EA ®$ 3,500 = $0 EAO$ 3,675 = $0 EA @$ 3,500 = $0 EA @$ 500 = $0 1 EAO$ 2,420 = $2,420 EAO$ 500 = $0 EA ®$ 3,400 = $0 1 LS ®$ 900 = $900 EAO$ 300 = $0 8 CYO$ 150 = $1,200 $7,796 $780 $8,576 Paget i PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR BONDING PURPOSES ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA -LOWER TM NO. 98 -171 DWG #6038 -I CITY OF ENCINITAS ITEM QUANTITY GRADING & Private Surface Improvements ROUGH GRADING RETAINING WALLS CONCRETE DRAINAGE DITCH SPLASH WALL 3" AC/ 6" AB PAVEMENT 6" CURB & GUTTER SILT FENCE CURB OUTLET D -27 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SANDBAGS CROSS GUTTER HYDROSEED SLOPES SUB -TOTAL CONTINGENCY (10 &) TOTAL GRADING W.O.# 294 -132 northmesai UNIT PRICE TOTAL ---- ------- ------ CY @$ 4.10 = $0 SF @$ 28.00 = $0 LF®$ 13.75 = $0 LF$O 20.00 = $0 SF @$ 2.15 = $0 LFQ$ 13.75 = $0 LF @$ 7.50 = $0 EA @$ 325.00 = $0 SF @$ 4.20 = $0 EA ®$ 2.50 = $0 SF @$ 5.00 = $0 SF @$ 0.10 = $0 $0 $0 $0 Page3 PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING IRVINE LAS VEGAS RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO DAVE HAMMAR TACK HILL LEX WILUMAN 10179 Huennekens 51. Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 558 -4500 PH (619) 558-1414 F X w .hunsekeccom Info ®HunsakerSD.com HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES 5 A N 0 1 F G 0. 1 N C. October 4, 1999 Blair Knoll City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -171 - SURVEY MONUMENTATION ESTIMATE AND BOND Dear Mr. Knoll, The cost of deferred monumentation for City of Encinitas Tract No.98 -171 will be $4,000. A bond for that amount will be forthcoming from the developer. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Thank you. Very truly yours, �_NN D S& `� G�� U O� O 4'�W- 6otlr99 JOHN W HILL, JR. L.S. 5669 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. DV& m W^cesf JNpnumeMNgn Mlen'O3BINC WWOI Eoc . 2 rss jw PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR BONDING PURPOSES ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA -QUAIL HOLLOW PROJECT NO. CITY OF ENCINITAS "PUBLIC" IMPROVEMENTS COST SUMMARY ------------------------- --- --- ---- -- - ---- -- TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................ $149,845 G R A N D T O T A L ......................... $149,845 '0 OfES �'O 0110 L. ti46 � rp. 6/30100 �P OF Cp,L \F HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES, INC 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, Ca 92121 Tel: (619) 558 -4500 Prepared by: Terry Allbritain Date: June 15, 1999 W.O.# 294 -132 northmesas Pagel PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR BONDING PURPOSES ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA -QUAIL HOLLOW PROJECT NO. CITY OF ENCINITAS ITEM SANITARY SEWER ---------------------- 8" SEWER MAIN 4" LATERAL STANDARD MANHOLE CLEANOUT JOIN EXISTING MANHOLE SUB -TOTAL CONTINGENCY (15t) TOTAL SANITARY SEWER $130,300 $19,545 $149,845 W.O.# 294 -132 northmesas Paget UNIT QUANTITY -------- PRICE ----- - TOTAL ------------ 2,125 LF @$ 40 $85,000 16 EAO$ 550 = $8,800 12 EA@$ 3,000 = $36,000 EA@$ 1,500 $0 1 EAM$ 500 = $500 $130,300 $19,545 $149,845 W.O.# 294 -132 northmesas Paget PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR BONDING PURPOSES ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA -QUAIL HOLLOW PROJECT NO. CITY OF ENCINITAS "PUBLIC" IMPROVEMENTS COST SUMMARY TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION ......................... $45,535 G R A N D T O T A L ......................... $45,535 - -- --- -------- -------------- _.cEP� 4CN�N\`PS HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES, INC 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, Ca 92121 Tel: (619) 558 -4500 Prepared by: Terry Allbritain � � O Z OF CAUF� Date: June 15, 1999 W.O.# 294 -132 northmesaw Pagel PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR BONDING PURPOSES ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA -QUAIL HOLLOW PROJECT NO. CITY OF ENCINITAS ITEM 0A 12" PVC WATER MAIN 12" DIP WATER MAIN 8" PVC WATER MAIN 1" WATER SERVICE FIRE HYDRANT 2" MAR 8" GATE VALVE 12" GATE VALVE JOIN EXISTING BLIND FLANGE 2" BLOW -OFF ASSEMBLY SUB -TOTAL CONTINGENCY (10 %) TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL 591 LF ®$ 45 = $26,595 LF ®$ 45 = $0 LF ®$ 31 = $0 16 EA ®$ 800 = $12,800 EA ®$ 3,000 = $0 EAO$ 1,100 = $0 EA ®$ 1,000 = $0 EA ®$ 1,800 = $0 1 EA @$ 900 = $900 EA ®$ 1,050 = $0 1 EA @$ 1,100 = $1,100 $41,395 $4,140 $45,535 W.O.# 294 -132 northmesaw Paget • 06/09/1999 14:35 619 -5." 1311 GED EC7 -NICS INC' PA(E 02 Adftht, Geotechnics + Incorporated Pnncipala: Anthony F. Relfat Mkh"I P. Imbriglio W. Lee Vonderhunt February 17, 1998 Cornerstone Communities Corporation 4365 Executive Drive, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92121 Attention: Mr. Jack Robson SUBJECT: GRADING PLAN REVIEW Encinitas Ranch, North Mesa Encinitas, California Project No. 0198 - 003-00 Document No. 8 -0104 References: (1) Hunsaker & Associates, 1998, Tentative Map, Encinitas Ranch, North Mesa, City of Encinitas, Callfomla: Job No. 2020 -6, Scale: 1 " =50', Sheets 1 through 4, stamped January 28. (2) Geotechnics Incorporated, 1996, Geotechnical Investigation, Encinitas Ranch, Encinitas, California: Project No. 0054 - 002.00, Document No. 5 -0588, dated January 19. Dear Mr. Robson: In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the referenced tentative map (Reference 1) for general conformance with the geotechnical recommendations presented in Reference 2, and for geote&nicai feasibility based on cur observations during the rough grading of the site. The plans show the proposed grades for 55 single - family lots along the west side or Quail Gardens Drive. Based on our review. It is our opinion that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. No geotachnical conditions were encountered that would preclude the proposed construction. Specific geotechnical design and construction considerations for the Proposed development include the following,. The too of the existing slope along the west side of Quail Gardens Drive, between approximate Station Nos. 104 +25 and 108 +50, will be extended to the west roughly 30 feet. We recommend that the alluvium underlying the proposed extension be removed and replaced with compacted fill. The alluvium is anticipated to be on the order of 15 feet moolm� 79.51 DvSlnor ?W* Aye, Ste. D SM Dleyo CaWorala • 92131 Phono (619) 536 -1000 Fa (619) 576 -8311 - 06/09/1999 14:35 619 -5' i11 C£OTEC!NICS INC PAGE 03 COM§rstor s Communites Corporation Protect No. 0196- 00 February 17, 1998 3.Op Occvment No. 84104 Pa • No. 2 thick in the canyon bottom. A portion of the existing storm drain that crosses Quail Gardens Drive at approximate Station No. 104 +95, is anticipated to experience additional settlement under the 'rcreased loads associated with the extension of the slope westward. The western end of the existing storm drain Is estimated to settle approximately %: inch. To reduce the potential for differential settlement beneath a structure's foundation, we recommend that the fill thickness generally not exceed a ratio of 2 to 1. Over - excavation of the pads, entailing replacement of some part of the formational material with compacted fill, should be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant during grading. The recommendations presented in this letter have been developed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing In this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, Is made as to the conclusions and professional opinions included in this letter. We appreciate this opportunity to be of professional service. Please do not hesitate to call us if You should have any questions or require additional information. GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Robert A. Torres, P.E. Senior Engineer DR/RAT /AFB Distribution: (5) Addressee Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. 43077 Principal 6eotechnics Incorporated C040333 Exp.f/47 t CIVIL ,mdekh, Geotechnics Incorporated Principals: Anthony F. Belfast Michael P. Imbrigho W. Lee Vanderhurst AS- GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NORTH MESA -LOWER ENCINITAS RANCH ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA prepared for Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 Carlsbad, California 92009 by GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Project No. 0517- 003 -01 Document No. 0 -1044 December 13, 2000 9245 Activity Rd., Ste. 103 • San Diego, California 92126 — Phone (858) 536.1000 • Fax (858) 536.8311 Am, Geotechnics Incorporated December 13, 2000 Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Mr. Richard Sanchez SUBJECT: AS- GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT North Mesa -Lower at Encinitas Ranch Encinitas, California Gentlemen: Principals: Anthony F. Belrasl Michael P. Imbriglio W. Lee Vanderhurst Project No. 0517- 003 -01 Document No. 0 -1044 This report summarizes the results of the geotechnical observation and testing services provided during the grading of North Mesa -Lower at Encinitas Ranch. In our opinion, the earthwork construction and compaction performed to date was conducted in general accordance with the intent of the project geotechnical recommendations and with the requirements of the City of Encinitas. We appreciate this opportunity to provide professional services. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report or the services provided, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Robert A. Torres, P.E. 43077 Principal DR/RAT /AFB/WLV Distribution: (5) Addressee (1) Mr. Jim Knowlton, City of Encinitas - 9245 Activity Rd., Ste. 103 • San Diego, California 92126 - Phone(858)536.1000 • Fax(858)536 -8311 AS- GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NORTH MESA -LOWER ENCINITAS RANCH ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................ ..............................1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ....................... ..............................1 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ......................... ..............................2 4.0 PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS ................. ............................... 2 5.0 GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .. ............................... 2 5.1 Torrey Sandstone ...................... ..............................3 5.2 Terrace Deposits ....................... ..............................3 5.3 Fill .................................. ..............................3 5.4 Groundwater .......................... ..............................4 5.5 Seismicity ............................ ..............................4 6.0 SUMMARY OF GRADING OPERATIONS ...... ............................... 5 6.1 Preparation of Existing Ground .......... ............................... 5 6.2 Fill .................................. ..............................5 6.3 Cut and Fill Slopes .................... ............................... 5 6.4 Over - Excavation for Varying Fill Thickness ............................... 6 7.0 LABORATORY TESTING ................... ............................... 7 8.0 FIELD DENSITY TESTING ................... ..............................7 9.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................. 7 9.1 Fill Compaction ...................... ............................... 8 9.2 Slope Stability ........................ ............................... 8 9.3 Site Drainage .......................... ..............................8 10.0 FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS ........................................ 10.1 Moisture Protection for Slabs .......... ............................... 11 10.2 Exterior Slabs ...................... ............................... 12 10.3 Concrete Reaction ..................... .............................12 11.0 RETAINING WALLS ........................ .............................12 12.0 LIMITATIONS ............................. .............................13 AS- GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NORTH MESA -LOWER ENCINITAS RANCH ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Site Location Map - Figure I Retaining Wall Detail - Figure 2 As- Graded Geotechnical Map - Plate 1 ILLUSTRATIONS APPENDICES REFERENCES ...................... ............................... Appendix A LABORATORY TESTING ............. ............................... Appendix B FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS ...... ............................... Appendix C AS- GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NORTH MESA -LOWER ENCINITAS RANCH ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of the geotechnical observation and testing services provided during the grading of the residential subdivision known as North Mesa -Lower in the Encinitas Ranch development in Encinitas, California. The purpose of the observation and testing services was to provide our opinion regarding the conformance of the earthwork construction with the project plans and specifications. Our services were provided in general accordance with our proposal dated August 24, 2000, 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES Field personnel were provided for this project to observe the grading of the site. Field and laboratory testing was conducted to support field observations. The observation and testing assisted us in developing professional opinions regarding the earthwork construction. Our services did not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees, or agents. Our services included the following: • Preparation of geotechnical recommendations as- needed during the earthwork construction. Pertinent reports and letters are listed in the attached References (Appendix A). • Observation and mapping of the geologic conditions exposed during the grading of the site including cut slope and compressible soil excavations. The geologic mapping is compiled on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. • Laboratory testing to determine pertinent engineering characteristics of the soil. The laboratory test results are summarized in Appendix B. • Observation of the surfaces prepared to receive fill. • Observation and testing of the fill during the site earthwork construction. The field density test results and relative compaction comparisons are summarized in Appendix C. The approximate test locations are shown on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map. • Preparation of this report which summarizes our findings and conclusions Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517. 003 -01 DECEMBER 13, 2000 DOCUMENT NO. 0-1044 PAGE NO. 2 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located in the northern part of the Encinitas Ranch development (Figure 1, Site Location Map), along the west side of Quail Gardens Drive. The site encompasses roughly 7 acres of mesa top that was previously used for agricultural purposes. A portion of the site was previously graded in 1998 ( Geotechnics, 1998) to fill in part of a drainage course located in the northwestern part of the site. The grading resulting in a fill slope and pad area with a desilting basin. Elevations at the site ranged from approximately 245 feet above mean sea level (MSL) at the base of the constructed slope, to approximately 333 feet MSL on the mesa top along Quail Gardens Drive. Existing improvements at the site consisted of the desilting basin and a 12 -inch diameter water main. The water main was located in an easement to the Olivenhain Municipal Water District. 4.0 PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS The site was graded to result in 16, single - family house pads situated along the alignment of a residential street that terminated in a cul -de -sac. The grading entailed some excavation of the mesa top area, and filling of the existing slope areas to result in relatively level pad areas. Constructed slopes were built at inclinations of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical), to heights up to approximately 30 feet. Finish grade elevations ranged from approximately 280 feet MSL where the previously constructed fill slope was raised up to 332 feet MSL at the top of the excavated slope along Quail Gardens Drive. Based on the project grading plans, the finish pad elevations ranged from 312.6 feet MSL to 321.6 feet MSL. The grading also resulted in an easement for a sewer pipeline in the northeast part of the site, and an easement replacing the existing easement for the water line in the western part of the site. The existing water main was removed from within the project boundaries. 5.0 GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The North Mesa -Lower site is situated in the coastal plain portion of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province. The province stretches from the Los Angeles basin to the tip of Baja Geotechnics Incorporated Reference: i nomas rsromers uuiae zuuu. � Geotechnics Incorporated Project No. 0517 - 003 -01 SITE LOCATION MAP Document No. 0 -1044 FIGURE 1 Rev 6/99 BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER -13, 2000 PROJECT NO. 0517 -003 -01 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 3 California and is characterized as a series of northwest trending mountain ranges separated by subparallel fault zones, and a coastal plain of subdued landforms. Specifically, the site is underlain by sedimentary formations associated with the Eocene -age Torrey Sandstone and Quaternary-age terrace deposits, and by fill placed during the grading conducted in 1998. Surficial deposits of topsoil or colluvium, and un- compacted fill associated with the existing water main, also existed at the site previous to the subject grading. The lateral extent of the formational material exposed is depicted on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. Brief descriptions of the geologic conditions encountered are as follow from oldest to youngest. 5.1 Torrey Sandstone As observed during the excavations, this formation consisted generally of pale yellow -brown sandstone. The sandstone was generally fine to medium grained and moderately cemented. This formation exists generally at elevations below 305 feet MSL, and accordingly, is not exposed at finish grade. 5.2 Terrace Deposits The terrace deposits generally cap the mesa top, unconformably overlying the Eocene -age Toney Sandstone. As observed at the site, the terrace deposits consisted generally of reddish brown, silty to clayey, fine- to medium - grained sandstone. The sandstone was moderately to strongly cemented near the surface, but weakly to very weakly cemented at depth. This material is exposed at finish grade in Lots 13, 14, 15, and 16, and in portions of the slope along Quail Gardens Drive. 5.3 Fill Geotechnically observed and tested fill was previously placed at the site during the grading for Phase I of Encinitas Ranch (Geotechnics, 1998). The fill material was derived generally from on -site or nearby excavations and consisted generally of silty to clayey sand. This fill is exposed at finish grade in the slope beneath Lots 8, 9, and 10. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 PROJECT NO. 0517 -003 -01 DOCUMENT NO. 0.1044 PAGE NO. 4 Undocumented, and un- compacted fill also existed at the site prior to the subject grading. This material was placed as backfill for the existing water main. These materials were excavated and reworked into the compacted fill placed during the subject grading. 5.4 Groundwater Groundwater seepage at the site was not observed during the subject grading. Groundwater conditions at the subject site are anticipated to fluctuate with seasonal weather and local irrigation practices. 5.5 Seismicity Evidence of active faulting was not observed during the grading of the site. The nearest known active fault to the site is the Rose Canyon/Offshore Zone of Deformation, located approximately 4 miles, or 6'h kilometers, to the west. A maximum probable earthquake of magnitude 6.5 along this fault zone could result in peak horizontal bedrock accelerations of approximately 0.4g. The subject site is located in the Seismic Zone 4 portion of California. There are, however, no known active faults underlying or immediately adjacent to the subject site. The Rose Canyon/Offshore Zone of Deformation is considered a Type B fault in the referenced California Department of Mines and Geology publication (1988). The nearest Type A fault is the Elsinore Fault Zone, which is located approximately 32 kilometers northeast of the site. Based on the site's distance from the nearest known Type A and Type B faults, the Na and N, near- source factors are 1.0 and 1.2 respectively. The subject lots are underlain by compacted fill soil and sedimentary formational material. Based on our observations during the grading of the site, the fill soils primarily fit Soil - Profile Type S,, and the sedimentary formational material fits Soil - Profile Type S, Fill depths under the subject pads range from 0 feet to roughly 50 feet. In our opinion, the site's Soil- Profile Type is primarily S,. Accordingly, Seismic Coefficients C, and C, are 0.40N„ and 0.56N, respectively. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 6.0 SUMMARY OF GRADING OPERATIONS PROJECT NO. 0517 -003 -01 DOCUMENT NO. 0.1044 PAGE NO. 5 In general, the earthwork conducted at the site consisted of the grading of the pad areas, the slopes, and the street alignment. The site grades are shown on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. The project grading plans, prepared by Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. (2000), serve as a base map for the As- Graded Geotechnical Map. The grading contractor for this project was Perry & Shaw, Incorporated. Typical cut -and -fill mass grading techniques were employed using heavy earth- moving equipment. Site grading began with the removal of deleterious materials and the loose fill at the site. Fill soils were subsequently placed to bring the site up to design grades. 6.1 Preparation of Existing Ground The site was cleared of rubbish and vegetation which was hauled off -site. The loose surficial soils were generally removed to expose competent formational materials or compacted fill from the previous grading. The approximate elevations of the bottoms of the removals are indicated on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map. Prior to placing fill, the exposed surfaces were scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches. The surface was then brought to approximate optimum moisture content, and compacted. 6.2 Fill Fill soils for site grading were primarily generated from on -site excavations. The fill was placed using scrapers that spread the material in 6- to 8 -inch thick lifts. This soil was then brought to approximate optimum moisture content using a water truck, and compacted by the scrapers delivering the fill materials, and a rubber -tired compactor which also mixed and spread the fill materials. 6.3 Cut and Fill Slopes Slopes at the site were constructed to heights of up to approximately 30 feet. The slopes appeared to be constructed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications at slope ratios of 2:1 or flatter. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 PROJECT NO. 0517-003-01 DOCUMENT NO. 0.1044 PAGE NO. 6 In general, fill slopes were rolled with a sheepsfoot roller at roughly 5 -foot intervals as the fill was brought up. The face of the finish slopes were track- walked using a dozer. 6.4 Over - Excavation for Varying Fill Thickness To reduce the potential for differential settlement associated with varying fill thicknesses beneath individual pads, formational materials were over - excavated and replaced with compacted fill under some lots. In general, over- excavation of lots was conducted to reduce the differential fill thickness beneath the approximate footprint of the proposed structures. The subsurface conditions are as follow: LOT NUMBER GREATER FILL THICKNESS ft LESSER FILL THICKNESS ft DIFFERENTIAL FILL THICKNESS ft 1 15 7 8 2 13 3 10 3 17 8 9 4 16 8 8 5 8 3 5 6 8 3 5 7 3 2 1 8 30 8 22 9 50 10 40 10 50 10 40 11 12 6 6 12 8 2 6 13 1 0 1 14 1 0 1 15 1 0 1 16 1 0 1 Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517- 003 -01 DECEMBER 13.2000 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 7 7.0 LABORATORY TESTING The various materials used for fill are tabulated in Appendix B, "Laboratory Testing ". Brief descriptions of the soil types used are included. The maximum density and optimum moisture content of each soil type was determined in the laboratory using ASTM method D 1557-91 (Modified Proctor) as a guideline. To evaluate materials for expansion potential at finish pad grade, laboratory testing was conducted on selected samples using ASTM test method D4829 -95 as a guideline. Selected samples were also tested for sulfate content. The results of the laboratory testing are presented in Appendix B. 8.0 FIELD DENSITY TESTING Where applicable, in -place moisture and density tests were made in general accordance with ASTM D2922 -91 and D3017 -88 (Nuclear Gauge Methods). The results of these tests are tabulated in the figures of Appendix C, "Field Density Test Results ". Appendix C also presents the relative compaction of the fill as compared to the respective maximum density. The locations and elevations of the tests shown on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map are based on field survey stakes and estimates from the grading plan topography. They should only be considered rough estimates. The estimated locations and elevations should not be utilized for the purpose of preparing cross sections showing test locations, or in any case, for the purpose of after -the -fact evaluating of the sequence of fill placement. 9.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS In our opinion, grading and compaction were performed in general accordance with the intent of the project geotechnical recommendations (Geotechnics, 1996) and with the requirements of the City of Encinitas. The conclusions and recommendations contained herein are based on the observations and testing performed between August 30 and December 7, 2000. No representations are made as to the quality and extent of materials not observed. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 9.1 Fill Compaction PROJECT NO. 0517- 003 -01 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 8 Based upon our observations and testing, it is our professional opinion that the structural fills were placed in substantial accordance with the compaction criteria of 90 percent of the maximum density. Where field testing indicated less than the specified relative compaction the pertinent soils were reworked to achieve the specified compaction. 9.2 Slope Stability Slopes were constructed at the site to heights of up to 30 feet. Slope stability was evaluated based on the referenced geotechnical investigation (Geotechnics, 1996), and site observations of conditions exposed during grading. In general, the existing slopes should be stable with regard to deep- seated failure with a factor -of -safety of 1.5 or more. Slope analysis was based on exposed conditions and soil strength characteristics. Any changes to constructed slope heights or ratios, or addition of retaining walls or other surcharge loads, should be evaluated by Geotechnics Incorporated. Man-made and natural slopes will weather over time as a result of wetting and drying, biologic forces, and gravity. As a result, the outer 5 feet of slope face may undergo minor down -slope creep over the years. While it is not possible to completely eliminate this effect, it can be minimized by establishing deep- rooted vegetation on the slope, maintaining the drainage patterns established during construction, and by rodent control. We recommend vegetation which is adapted to semi -arid climates, therefore requiring minimal irrigation. 9.3 Site Drainage Foundation and slab performance depends greatly on how well the runoff waters drain from the site. This is true both during construction and over the entire life of the structure. The ground surface around structures should be graded so that water flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. The surface gradient needed to achieve this depends on the prevailing landscape. In general, we recommend that pavement and lawn areas within 5 feet of buildings slope away at gradients of at least 2 percent. Densely vegetated areas should Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 PROJECT NO. 0517-003-01 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 9 have minimum gradients of at least 5 percent away from buildings within 5 feet of the structure's perimeter. Densely vegetated areas are considered those in which the planting type and spacing is such that the flow of water is impeded. Planters should be built so that water from them will not seep into the foundation, slab, or pavement areas. Site irrigation should be limited to the minimum necessary to sustain landscaping plants. Should excessive irrigation, water line breaks, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones or "perched" groundwater may develop in fill soils. This condition may result in excessive moisture migration into and through foundations and slabs. Damage to landscape may also occur. 10.0 FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS The following recommendations are based on the expected existing subsurface conditions. They are generally consistent with methods typically used in southern California. Other alternatives may be available. The foundation recommendations presented herein are minimum criteria based on geotechnical concerns and should not be considered to preclude more restrictive criteria of governing agencies or by the structural engineer. The design of the foundation system should be performed by the project structural engineer based on current code requirements and accepted engineering practices. Post - Tensioned Slabs Edge Moisture Variation, em Center Lift: 5.3 feet Edge Lift: 2.6 feet Differential Swell, Y. Center Lift: 1.7 inches Edge Lift: 0.6 inches Differential Settlement: 3/4 -inch Allowable Bearing Capacity: 2,000 Ibs/ft2 at slab subgrade Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 Conventional Foundations PROJECT NO. 0517- 003 -01 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 10 Allowable Soil Bearing: 2,500 Ibs /ft'- (allow a one -third increase for short-term wind or seismic loads) Minimum Footing Width: 12 inches Minimum Footing Depth: 18 inches below lowest adjacent soil grade Minimum Slab Thickness: 5%: inches Differential Settlement: 3/4 -inch Lateral loads may be resisted by friction and by the passive resistance of the supporting soils. A coefficient of friction of 0.3 may be used between the bottom of footings and the supporting soils. The passive resistance of the fill soils may be assumed to be equal to the pressure developed by a fluid with a density of 300 lbs. /ft . A one -third increase in the passive value may be used for wind or seismic loads. The passive resistance of the soils may be combined with the frictional resistance without reduction in evaluating the total lateral resistance. The following CBC seismic parameters may be used for design of the proposed buildings: Seismic Zone Factor, Z. 0.4 Seismic Source Type: B Soil Profile Type: SC Seismic Coefficients, Ca: 0.40Na C,: 0.56N, Near- Source Factors, Na: 1.0 N,: 1.2 Footings adjacent to slopes should be founded at a depth such that the distance between the lower outside edge of the footing and the face of any slope is at least 8 feet. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517.003 -01 DECEMBER 13, 2000 DOCUMENT NO. 0-1044 PAGE NO. 1 I 10.1 Moisture Protection for Slabs Concrete slabs constructed on soil ultimately cause the moisture content to rise in the underlying soil. This results from continued capillary rise and the termination of normal evapotranspiration. Because normal concrete is permeable, the moisture will eventually penetrate the slab unless some protection is provided. Typical moisture protection used in southern California for interior, on -grade slabs consists of 2 inches of clean sand covered by a 20 -mil moisture barrier covered by another 2- inches of clean sand. The sand should have a minimum sand equivalent of at least 50 when tested in accordance with ASTM test method D2419. It has been our experience that such systems will transmit from approximately 6 to 12 pounds of moisture per 1000 square feet per day. It is our opinion that soil conditions do not exist that would preclude the use of the indicated moisture protection on this project. It should be recognized, however, that this system relies entirely on the integrity of the visqueen membrane. Accordingly, care should be taken to protect the visqueen against all punctures and to provide adequate overlap at all seams. If the above discussed moisture transmission is considered to be excessive for the types of floor coverings planned, further protection can be realized by adding a capillary break layer in accordance with the following alternative: 2 inches of clean sand (sand equivalent of 30 or more), over 10 mil. plastic sheeting, over 4 inches of minus 3/8 -inch crushed rock over subgrade. Another alternative would be to place a moisture barrier with a thickness greater than 20 mil directly on the subgrade, covered with at least 2 inches of clean sand. The moisture barrier should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's requirements, and any joints or laps should be throughly sealed in accordance with the manufacturer's requirements to provide a thorough seal. The concrete should have a low water - cement ratio of no greater than 0.5, and be moist -cured for at least 5 days in accordance with the methods recommended by the American Concrete Institute. Additionally, the project architect and/or a waterproofing consultant should evaluate the moisture barrier requirements based on the anticipated floor coverings and proposed use. We also recommend that a special registered Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 PROJECT NO. 0517- 003 -01 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 12 inspector test and inspect the concrete placement and slab construction to confirm the recommendations herein are implemented in the field. 10.2 Exterior Slabs Reinforcement and the use of crack control joints should help reduce random cracking and differential movement. Slabs should be at least 4 inches in thickness and should be reinforced with at least 6 -inch by 6 -inch, W2.9 by W2.9 welded -wire fabric. Slabs may bear directly on compacted subgrade. Crack control joints should be provided on no greater than 5 -foot centers for sidewalks, and not greater than 8 -foot centers, each way, for slabs 10.3 Concrete Reaction The type of cement used should be based on the results of sulfate content testing of finish grade soils as reported herein, and the design criteria of the 1998 California Building Code. The sulfate content test results presented in Appendix B represent the existing soil conditions at the site. It should be noted that soluble sulfate in the irrigation water supply, and/or the use of fertilizer may cause the sulfate content in the surfrcial soils to increase with time. This may result in a higher sulfate exposure than that indicated by the test results reported herein. Studies have shown that the use of improved cements in the concrete, and a low water - cement ratio will increase the resistance of the concrete to sulfate exposure. 11.0 RETAINING WALLS Foundations for retaining walls may be designed using the criteria presented for conventional structures. For cantilever retaining walls, where the backfill is level or nearly level, an active earth pressure approximated by an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 lbs. /ft may be used. Where the earth slopes upwards at 2:1, an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 lbs. /ft' may be used. The active pressure should be used for walls free to yield at the top at least 0.2 percent of the wall height. For walls restrained so that such movement is not permitted, an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 lbs. /ft'should be used, based on at -rest soil conditions with level backfill. Where the earth slopes upwards at 2:1, Geotechnies Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517- 003 -01 DECEMBER 13, 2000 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 13 an equivalent fluid pressure of 85 lbs. /ft' may be used for restrained walls. In addition to the recommended earth pressure, walls adjacent to vehicular traffic should be designed to resist a uniform lateral pressure of 1001bs. /ft2, acting as a result of an assumed 300 lbs. /ft' surcharge behind the wall. The above pressures assume no hydrostatic pressures. If these are applicable, they will increase the lateral pressures on the wall and we should be contacted for additional recommendations. Walls should contain an adequate subdrain to reduce hydrostatic forces. Wall drain details are given in the attached Figure 2, Retaining Wall Drain Details. Backfilling retaining walls with expansive soils can increase lateral pressures well beyond the active or at -rest pressures indicated above. We recommend that retaining walls be backfilled with soil having an Expansive Index of 20 or less. The backfill area should include the zone defined by a 1:1 sloping plane, back from the base of the wall. Retaining wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction, based on Modified Proctor density. Backfill should not be placed until walls have achieved adequate structural strength. Heavy compaction equipment which could cause distress to walls should not be used. 12.0 LIMITATIONS Our services were performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. The samples taken and used for testing, the observations made and the in -place field testing performed are believed representative of the project; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between tested or observed locations. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project and incorporated into the plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. As in most major projects, conditions revealed by excavation may be at variance with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by Geotechnics Incorporated and Geotechnics Incorporated DAMP - PROOFING OR WATER- PROOFING AS REQUIRED ROCK AND FABRIC ALTERNATIVE 'COMPACTED BACKPILL • • ; .i2"MIN 12 -INCH MINIMUM MINUS 3/4 -INCH CRUSHED ROCK ENVELOPED IN FILTER FABRIC (MIFAR 140NL, SUPAC 4NP, OR , 4 APPROVED SIMILAR) , DAMP - PROOFING OR WATER- u PROOFING AS REQUIRED 4 -INCH DIAM. ADS OR PVC PERFORATED PIPE GEOCOMPOSITE 12" Mi N PANEL DRAIN -� COMPACTED• BAC(CFILL• 1 CU. FT. PER LINEAL FOOT OF PANEL DRAIN MINUS 3/4 -INCH CRUSHED ALTERNATIVE ROCK ENVELOPED IN FILTER FABRIC. ' 4-INCH DIAM. ADS OR PVC PERFORATED PIPE - -� NOTES 1) Perforated pipe should outlet through a solid pipe to a free gravity outfall. Perforated pipe and outlet pipe should have a fall of at least 1 %. 2) As an alternative to the perforated pipe and outlet, weep holes may be included in the bottom of the wall. Weepholes should be at least 2 inches in diameter, and be spaced no greater than 8 feet. 3) Filter fabric should consist of Mirafi 140N, Supac 5NP, Amoco 4599, or similar approved fabric. Filter fabric should be overlapped at least 6- inches. 4) Geocomposite panel drain should consist of Miradrain 6000, J -DRain 400, Supac DS -15, or approved similar product. 5) Drain installation should be observed by the geotechnical consultant prior to backfilling. Ambi G e o t e c h n i c s I RETAINING WALL DRAIN DETAIL I Project No. 0517 - 003 -01 �I n c o r p o r a t e d Document No. 0 -1044 FIGURE 2 BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517- 003 -01 DECEMBER 13, 2000 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 14 designs adjusted as required or alternate designs recommended. Although our observations and testing did not reveal deficiencies, we do not guarantee the contractor's work, nor do the services provided by Geotechnics relieve the contractor of responsibility in the event of subsequently discovered defects in his work. Changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Dick Robe Robert A. Torres, P.E. 43077 Project Geologist Principal gLee Vanderhurst, C.E.G. 1125 Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. C 40333 Principal Principal W. LEE i �• 9pm L VANDERHURST No. tits • Z ¢ C ¢ W13OTT 4D s CERTIFIED N ENGINEERING T EXP.3.3I•o4 Q• :A GEOLOGI 9). •�• Q '�j. CIVIC- ? FoF CAL��Q� Geotechnics Incorporated APPENDIX A REFERENCES American Society for Testing and Materials, 1992, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4, Construction, Volume 04.08 Soil and Rock; Dimension Stone; Geosynthetics, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1296 p. California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, 1998, Maps of Known Active Fault Near- Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions ofNevada: International Conference of Building Officials, Sheet 0 -36. Geotechnics Incorporated, 1996, Geotechnical Investigation, Encinitas Ranch, Encinitas, California: Project No. 0054- 002 -00, Document No. 5 -0588, dated January 19. Geotechnics Incorporated, 1998, As- Graded Geotechnical Report, Encinitas Ranch, Encinitas, California: Project No. 0054- 002 -02, Document No. 6 -0620, dated March 31. Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, Proposal for Geotechnical Services, North Mesa - Lower, Encinitas Ranch: Project No. 0517- 003 -01, Document No. 0 -0890, dated August 24. Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, Interim As- Graded Report, North Mesa - Lower, Lots 1 through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and Lot 16, Encinitas Ranch: Project No. 0517- 003 -01, Document No. 0 -1082, dated October 13. Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, Foundation Plan Review, North Mesa - Lower, Lots 1 through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and Lot 16, Encinitas Ranch: Project No. 0517- 003 -01, Document No. 0 -1087, dated October 16. Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, R -Value Test Results and Preliminary Pavement Section Recommendations, North Mesa - Lower, Encinitas, California: Project No. 0517- 003 -01, Document No. 0 -1098, dated October 18. Jennings, C. W. 1994, Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas with Locations and Ages of Recent Volcanic Eruptions: California Division of Mines and Geology, Geologic Data Map Series, Map No. 6. Mualchin, L., and Jones, A.L., 1992, Peak Accelerations from Maximum Credible Earthquakes in California (Rock and Stiff -Soils Sites): California Division of Mines and Geology, Open - File Report, 92 -1. Hunsaker & Associates San Diego Inc., 2000, Grading and Improvement Plans for North Mesa - Lower: WO 0294 -0132, BIN 1080 -A, 9 sheets. Geotechnics Incorporated APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Selected samples of soils encountered during the earthwork construction were tested using generally accepted testing standards. The soils selected for testing are believed to be generally representative of the materials encountered during the earthwork construction at the site; however variations may occur in the soils at the site between test locations. Laboratory testing was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in the same locality. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the correctness or serviceability of the test results or the conclusions derived from these tests. Where a specific laboratory test method has been referenced, such as ASTM, Caltrans, or AASHTO, the reference applies only to the specified laboratory test method and not to associated referenced test method(s) or practices, and the test method referenced has been used only as a guidance document for the general performance of the test and not as a "Test Standard." A brief description of the tests performed follows: Classification: Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System as established by the American Society of Civil Engineers. Maximum Density /Optimum Moisture: The maximum densities and optimum moisture contents of representative soil samples were determined by using test method ASTM D1557 -91, modified Proctor. Rock corrections were applied in accordance with ASTM D4718. The test results are summarized in Figure B -1. Sulfate Content: To assess the potential for reactivity with below grade concrete, selected soil samples were tested for water - soluble sulfate content using method SMEW W4500So4E. The results are presented as a percentage by weight on Figure B -1. Expansion Index: The expansion potential of selected soils was characterized by using the test method ASTM D4829 -95. The results are presented in Figure B -2. Geotechnics Incorporated MAXIMUM DENSITY /OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D1557 -91) SAMPLE NO. DESCRIPTION MAXIMUM DENSITY (PCF) OPTIMUM MOISTURE ( %) 1 Reddish brown silty sand (SM) 128 10 2 Brown clayey sand (SC) 128 9 3 Yellow brown clayey sand (SC) 124 8%2 4 Dark brown clayey sand (SC) 129%2 9 5 Yellow brown clayey sand (SC) 124%2 10' /2 6 Yellow brown silty sand (SM) 118'/2 13'/2 7 Light brown silty sand (SM) 107 15%2 8 Darl brown silty sand (SM) with gravel 124 11 %2 SULFATE CONTENT SAMPLE NUMBER SAMPLE LOCATION REPRESENTING LOTS SULFATE CONTENT S -1 Lot 1 Lot 1 0.01 S -2 Lot 2 Lots 2 through 5 0.02 S -3 Lot 8 Lots 7 through 9 0.03 S-4 Lot 11 Lots 10 through 12 0.03 S -5 Lot 14 Lots 13, 14, and 16 0.02 S -6 Lot 6 Lot 6 0.02 S -7 Lot 15 Lot 15 0.02 G e o t e c h n i c s Laboratory Test Results `Incorporated Project No. 0517- 003 -01 Document No. 0 -1044 Figure B-1 EXPANSION INDEX TESTS (ASTM D4829 -95) LOT NUMBER EXPANSION INDEX EXPANSION POTENTIAL 1 0 Very Low 2 0 Very Low 3 0 Very Low 4 0 Very Low 5 0 Very Low 6 0 Very Low 7 0 Very Low 8 0 Very Low 9 0 Very Low 10 0 Very Low 1 I 0 Very Low 12 0 Very Low 13 0 Very Low 14 0 Very Low 15 0 Very Low 16 0 Very Low UBC TABLE NO. 29-C, CLASSIFICATION OF EXPANSIVE SOIL EXPANSION INDEX POTENTIAL EXPANSION 0 -20 Very Low 21 -50 Low 51 -90 Medium 91 -130 High Above 130 Very High G e o t e c h n i c s Laboratory Test Results `Incorporated Project No. 0517- 003 -01 Document No. 0 -10444 Figure B -2 APPENDIX C FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS In -place moisture and density tests were made in accordance with ASTM D2922 -91 and D3017 -88 (Nuclear Gauge Method). The results of these tests are tabulated in the Figures C -1 and C -2, "Field Density Test Results ". The approximate test locations are presented on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map. The locations and elevations indicated for the tests presented on the plates are based on field survey stakes and estimates from the grading plan topography, and should only be considered rough estimates. The estimated locations and elevations should not be utilized for the purpose of preparing cross sections showing test locations, or in any case, for the purpose of after -the -fact evaluating of the sequence of fill placement. The precision of the field density test and the maximum dry density test is not exact and variations should be expected. For example, the American Society for Testing and Materials has recently researched the precision of ASTM Method No. D1557 and found the accuracy of the maximum dry density to be plus or minus 4 percent of the mean value and the optimum moisture content to be accurate to plus or minus 15 percent of the mean value; the Society specifically states the "acceptable range of test results expressed as a percent of mean value" is the range stated above. In effect, an indicated relative compaction of 90 percent has an acceptable range of 86.6 to 92.8 percent based on the maximum dry density determination. Geotechnics Incorporated =G e o t e c h n i c s DENSITY TEST RESULTS Project No. 0517- 003 -01 �I incorporated North Mesa -Lower Document No. 0 -1044 114.9 Barratt American FIGURE C -1 NU 2 Test Test Elevation Sail Max. Dry Moisture Dry Relative Required Retest Test No. Date [ftj Type Density Content Density Compaction Compaction Number Method 2 128.0 9.5 115.1 [pCq N [pCq [ %] [ %] 288 2 1 9/12/00 284 1 128.0 11.3 114.9 90 90 NU 2 9/12/00 286 1 128.0 11.8 114.7 90 90 NU 3 9112100 294 1 128.0 12.1 115.1 90 90 NU 4 9/12/00 287 2 128.0 9.5 115.1 90 90 NU 5 9112/00 288 2 128.0 9.3 115.8 90 90 NU 6 9/13/00 295 2 128.0 10.5 117.4 92 90 NU 7 9/13/00 290 2 128.0 9.3 114.9 90 90 NU 8 9113/00 292 1 128.0 12.1 116.1 91 90 NU 9 9/13/00 297 1 128.0 10.1 115.4 90 90 NU 10 9113100 305 1 128.0 8.1 111.2 87 90 11 NU 11 9/13/00 305 1 128.0 10.4 116.2 91 90 NU 12 9/13100 300 4 129.5 9.3 116.9 90 90 NU 13 9/13/00 303 4 129.5 9.1 118.4 91 90 NU 14 9/13/00 304 1 128.0 11.0 114.6 90 90 NU 15 9/13/00 306 1 128.0 12.5 115.5 90 90 NU 16 9/13/00 307 1 128.0 8.1 109.4 85 90 17 NU 17 9113/00 307 1 128.0 13.1 115.7 90 90 NU 18 9/13/00 308 4 129.5 9.9 119.5 92 90 NU 19 9114/00 309 4 129.5 10.5 119.5 92 90 NU 20 9/14100 310 1 128.0 13.8 114.8 90 90 NU 21 9/14/00 309 1 128.0 12.1 115.9 91 90 NU 22 9/14/00 310 1 128.0 11.8 115.8 90 90 NU 23 9/14/00 308 3 124.0 10.8 111.3 90 90 NU 24 9114/00 309 3 124.0 10.9 111.0 90 90 NU 25 9/14/00 310 1 128.0 13.3 115.8 90 90 NU 26 9/14/00 311 2 128.0 9.1 116.2 91 90 NU 27 9114/00 312 2 128.0 9.5 118.6 93 90 NU 28 9/14/00 311 1 128.0 11.4 116.3 91 90 NU 29 9/15/00 312 5 124.5 11.4 112.3 90 90 NU 30 9/15/00 305 3 124.0 10.5 114.5 92 90 NU 31 9115/00 296 3 124.0 10.0 114.7 93 90 NU 32 9/15/00 294 5 124.5 11.3 114.3 92 90 NU 33 9/15/00 299 5 124.5 14.7 111.8 90 90 NU 34 9/15/00 299 1 128.0 10.4 115.5 90 90 NU 35 9/15/00 298 1 128.0 10.0 116.7 91 90 NU 36 9/15/00 300 1 128.0 10.8 116.2 91 90 NU 37 9/18/00 315 3 124.0 8.4 112.6 91 90 NU 38 9/18/00 304 4 129.5 11.4 117.1 90 90 NU 39 9/18/00 305 1 128.0 12.8 116.8 91 90 NU 40 9/18/00 303 3 124.0 8.8 114.3 92 90 NU 41 9/18/00 309 5 124.5 11.8 112.3 90 90 NU 42 9/18/00 305 5 124.5 10.5 112.9 91 90 NU 43 9/18/00 314 3 124.0 9.1 111.5 90 90 NU 44 9118/00 313 5 124.5 10.6 112.1 90 90 NU 45 9/18/00 309 3 124.0 8.8 111.6 90 90 NU 46 9/18/00 310 5 124.5 10.6 111.9 90 90 NU 47 9/19/00 313 5 124.5 10.9 113.1 91 90 NU 48 9119/00 311 5 124.5 11.3 112.8 91 90 NU 49 9/19/00 314 3 124.0 10.7 112.7 91 90 NU 50 9120/00 315 5 124.5 13.4 115.5 93 90 NU 51 9/20/00 316 5 124.5 14.1 112.5 90 90 NU =G e o t e c h n i c s DENSITY TEST RESULTS Project No. 0517 - 003 -01 �I n c o r p o r a t e d North Mesa -Lower Barrett American Document No. 0 -1044 FIGURE C -2 112.7 91 Test Test Elevation Soil Max. Dry Moisture Dry Relative Required Retest Test No. Date [ft] Type Density Content Density Compaction Compaction Number Method 55 9/21100 319 3 [pc�] N [pin 90 NU 56 52 9120/00 316 5 124.5 11.2 112.7 91 90 NU 53 9120100 317 5 124.5 11.1 113.5 91 90 NU 54 9/21/00 318 3 124.0 9.1 112.5 91 90 NU 55 9/21100 319 3 124.0 10.8 111.3 90 90 NU 56 9/21/00 317 5 124.5 9.2 114.5 92 90 NU 57 9/26/00 310 3 124.0 10.4 112.1 90 90 NU 58 9/26/00 306 3 124.0 9.9 111.8 90 90 NU 59 9/26/00 300 3 124.0 8.4 112.7 91 90 NU 60 9126/00 299 3 124.0 9.6 112.3 91 90 NU 61 9/27/00 311 3 124.0 9.4 112.1 90 90 NU 62 9/27/00 316 5 124.5 11.8 113.4 91 90 NU 63 927/00 301 3 124.0 9.9 112.8 91 90 NU 64 927/00 313 5 124.5 10.8 112.5 90 90 NU 65 10/6100 322 3 124.0 9.6 114.1 92 90 NU 66 10/6/00 319 5 124.5 10.6 114.6 92 90 NU 67 10/6100 319 5 124.5 11.2 113.2 91 90 NU 68 1016 /00 318 5 124.5 9.9 112.5 90 90 NU 69 10/6/00 317 5 124.5 8.4 112.3 90 90 NU 70 10/6100 316 5 124.5 10.6 113.0 91 90 NU 71 10/6/00 319 5 124.5 10.1 112.9 91 90 NU 72 10/6/00 314 5 124.5 9.7 114.6 92 90 NU 73 10/6100 313 5 124.5 9.4 113.1 91 90 NU 74 10/6100 313 3 124.0 8.0 112.6 91 90 NU 75 10/6/00 314 3 124.0 8.9 112.4 91 90 NU 76 12/6/00 312 2 128.0 9.0 117.4 92 90 NU 77 12/6/00 313 2 128.0 8.9 116.5 91 90 NU 78 1216/00 314 2 128.0 8.4 117.2 92 90 NU 79 1216/00 315 2 128.0 8.7 117.8 92 90 NU 80 12/7/00 314 3 124.0 9.0 113.4 91 90 NU 81 1217/00 315 3 124.0 9.2 1123 91 90 NU 82 1217100 316 3 124.0 9.2 115.9 93 90 NU ,idbk, Geotechnics ANEEMNI.- Incorporated Principals: Anthony F. Belfast Michael P. Imbriglio W. Lee Vanderhursl AS- GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NORTH MESA -LOWER ENCINITAS RANCH ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA prepared for Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 Carlsbad, California 92009 by GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Project No. 0517- 003 -01 Document No. 0 -1044 December 13, 2000 9245 Activity Rd, Ste. 103 • San Diego, California 92126 Phone (858) 536 -1000 • Fax (858) 536 -8311 AdMik, Geotechnics Incorporated December 13, 2000 Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Mr. Richard Sanchez SUBJECT: AS- GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT North Mesa -Lower at Encinitas Ranch Encinitas, California Gentlemen: Principals: Anthony F. Belfast Michael P. Imbriglio W. Lee Vanderhursl Project No. 0517- 003 -01 Document No. 0 -1044 This report summarizes the results of the geotechnical observation and testing services provided during the grading of North Mesa -Lower at Encinitas Ranch. In our opinion, the earthwork construction and compaction performed to date was conducted in general accordance with the intent of the project geotechnical recommendations and with the requirements of the City of Encinitas. We appreciate this opportunity to provide professional services. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report or the services provided, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Robert A. Torres, P.E. 43077 Principal III 01A"7:r1% \06 -YAW WA Distribution: (5) Addressee (1) Mr. Jim Knowlton, City of Encinitas - 9245 Activity Rd., Ste. 103 • San Diego, California 92126 - Phone (858) 536 -1000 • Fax (858) 536 -8311 AS- GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NORTH MESA -LOWER ENCINITAS RANCH ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................... ............................... 1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ...................... ............................... 1 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ......................... ..............................2 4.0 PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS ................. ............................... 2 5.0 GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .. ............................... 2 5.1 Torrey Sandstone ...................... ..............................3 5.2 Terrace Deposits ....................... ..............................3 5.3 Fill .................................. ..............................3 5.4 Groundwater .......................... ..............................4 5.5 Seismicity ............................ ..............................4 6.0 SUMMARY OF GRADING OPERATIONS ...... ............................... 5 6.1 Preparation of Existing Ground .......... ............................... 5 6.2 Fill .................................. ..............................5 6.3 Cut and Fill Slopes .................... ............................... 5 6.4 Over - Excavation for Varying Fill Thickness ............................... 6 7.0 LABORATORY TESTING ................... ............................... 7 8.0 FIELD DENSITY TESTING .................. ............................... 7 9.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................. 7 9.1 Fill Compaction ...................... ............................... 8 9.2 Slope Stability ........................ ............................... 8 9.3 Site Drainage .......................... ..............................8 10.0 FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS ............... ............................... 9 10.1 Moisture Protection for Slabs .......... ............................... 11 10.2 Exterior Slabs ........................ .............................12 10.3 Concrete Reaction ................... ............................... 12 11.0 RETAINING WALLS ........................ .............................12 12.0 LIMITATIONS ............................. .............................13 AS- GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NORTH MESA -LOWER ENCINITAS RANCH ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Site Location Map - Figure 1 Retaining Wall Detail - Figure 2 As- Graded Geotechnical Map - Plate 1 ILLUSTRATIONS APPENDICES REFERENCES ...................... ............................... Appendix A LABORATORY TESTING ............. ............................... Appendix B FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS ...... ............................... Appendix C AS- GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NORTH MESA -LOWER ENCINITAS RANCH ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of the geotechnical observation and testing services provided during the grading of the residential subdivision known as North Mesa -Lower in the Encinitas Ranch development in Encinitas, California. The purpose of the observation and testing services was to provide our opinion regarding the conformance of the earthwork construction with the project plans and specifications. Our services were provided in general accordance with our proposal dated August 24, 2000. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES Field personnel were provided for this project to observe the grading of the site. Field and laboratory testing was conducted to support field observations. The observation and testing assisted us in developing professional opinions regarding the earthwork construction. Our services did not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees, or agents. Our services included the following: • Preparation of geotechnical recommendations as- needed during the earthwork construction. Pertinent reports and letters are listed in the attached References (Appendix A). • Observation and mapping of the geologic conditions exposed during the grading of the site including cut slope and compressible soil excavations. The geologic mapping is compiled on the As -Graded Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. • Laboratory testing to determine pertinent engineering characteristics of the soil. The laboratory test results are summarized in Appendix B. • Observation of the surfaces prepared to receive fill. • Observation and testing of the fill during the site earthwork construction. The field density test results and relative compaction comparisons are summarized in Appendix C. The approximate test locations are shown on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map. • Preparation of this report which summarizes our findings and conclusions. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517-003-01 DECEMBER 13, 2000 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 2 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located in the northern part of the Encinitas Ranch development (Figure 1, Site Location Map), along the west side of Quail Gardens Drive. The site encompasses roughly 7 acres of mesa top that was previously used for agricultural purposes. A portion of the site was previously graded in 1998 ( Geotechnics, 1998) to fill in part of a drainage course located in the northwestern part of the site. The grading resulting in a fill slope and pad area with a desilting basin. Elevations at the site ranged from approximately 245 feet above mean sea level (MSL) at the base of the constructed slope, to approximately 333 feet MSL on the mesa top along Quail Gardens Drive. Existing improvements at the site consisted of the desilting basin and a 12 -inch diameter water main. The water main was located in an easement to the Olivenhain Municipal Water District. 4.0 PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS The site was graded to result in 16, single - family house pads situated along the alignment of a residential street that terminated in a cul -de -sac. The grading entailed some excavation of the mesa top area, and filling of the existing slope areas to result in relatively level pad areas. Constructed slopes were built at inclinations of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical), to heights up to approximately 30 feet. Finish grade elevations ranged from approximately 280 feet MSL where the previously constructed fill slope was raised up to 332 feet MSL at the top of the excavated slope along Quail Gardens Drive. Based on the project grading plans, the finish pad elevations ranged from 312.6 feet MSL to 321.6 feet MSL. The grading also resulted in an easement for a sewer pipeline in the northeast part of the site, and an easement replacing the existing easement for the water line in the western part of the site. The existing water main was removed from within the project boundaries. 5.0 GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The North Mesa -Lower site is situated in the coastal plain portion of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province. The province stretches from the Los Angeles basin to the tip of Baja Geotechnics Incorporated �•diA'�� ."yam i � A 33 I j �rrA 4j, - %q. A- ins s is I E u( S I T E-1 KlxtrAs xq ST DP I 4 +__ ...._ Lax Y E L nor DRITFAIIF ♦ a< [E1l IA <D s I STATE y xcax LA u LEUGDt BL YD i ;p RJR ♦ u51 � rKINITAS M.Jy L' xA W1 �F ^� 4 Or ° ° r •:. 1 wrW.nVE S�STT':� nn a �? t: -IL, aNM I % IA d OCEAN y y!n s ENCINITAS ! u 1.. --Y� FwnroFr STAFF • [t gD g r �•. I Q REQUM c s@ � ■ YfLWIIbC Y S of SL 5� is Hffm kN 4 ..1_ Reference: Thomas Brothers Guide 2000. 0.5 Miles G e o t e c h n i c s Project NOL 0517- 003 -01 =I n c o r p o rated SITE LOCATION MAP Document No. 0 -1044 FIGURE 1 Rev 6199 BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 PROJECT NO. 0517- 003 -01 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 3 California and is characterized as a series of northwest trending mountain ranges separated by subparallel fault zones, and a coastal plain of subdued landforms. Specifically, the site is underlain by sedimentary formations associated with the Eocene -age Torrey Sandstone and Quaternary-age terrace deposits, and by fill placed during the grading conducted in 1998. Surficial deposits of topsoil or colluvium, and un- compacted fill associated with the existing water main, also existed at the site previous to the subject grading. The lateral extent of the formational material exposed is depicted on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. Brief descriptions of the geologic conditions encountered are as follow from oldest to youngest. 5.1 Torrey Sandstone As observed during the excavations, this formation consisted generally of pale yellow -brown sandstone. The sandstone was generally fine to medium grained and moderately cemented. This formation exists generally at elevations below 305 feet MSL, and accordingly, is not exposed at finish grade. 5.2 Terrace Deposits The terrace deposits generally cap the mesa top, unconformably overlying the Eocene -age Torrey Sandstone. As observed at the site, the terrace deposits consisted generally of reddish brown, silty to clayey, fine- to medium - grained sandstone. The sandstone was moderately to strongly cemented near the surface, but weakly to very weakly cemented at depth. This material is exposed at finish grade in Lots 13, 14, 15, and 16, and in portions of the slope along Quail Gardens Drive. 5.3 Fill Geotechnically observed and tested fill was previously placed at the site during the grading for Phase I of Encinitas Ranch ( Geotechnccs, 1998). The fill material was derived generally from on -site or nearby excavations and consisted generally of silty to clayey sand. This fill is exposed at finish grade in the slope beneath Lots 8, 9, and 10. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 PROJECT NO. 0517- 003 -01 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 4 Undocumented, and un- compacted fill also existed at the site prior to the subject grading. This material was placed as backfill for the existing water main. These materials were excavated and reworked into the compacted fill placed during the subject grading. 5.4 Groundwater Groundwater seepage at the site was not observed during the subject grading. Groundwater conditions at the subject site are anticipated to fluctuate with seasonal weather and local irrigation practices. 5.5 Seismicity Evidence of active faulting was not observed during the grading of the site. The nearest known active fault to the site is the Rose Canyon/Offshore Zone of Deformation, located approximately 4 miles, or 6' /x kilometers, to the west. A maximum probable earthquake of magnitude 6.5 along this fault zone could result in peak horizontal bedrock accelerations of approximately 0.4g. The subject site is located in the Seismic Zone 4 portion of California. There are, however, no known active faults underlying or immediately adjacent to the subject site. The Rose Canyon/Offshore Zone of Deformation is considered a Type B fault in the referenced California Department of Mines and Geology publication (1988). The nearest Type A fault is the Elsinore Fault Zone, which is located approximately 32 kilometers northeast of the site. Based on the site's distance from the nearest known Type A and Type B faults, the Na and N, near- source factors are 1.0 and 1.2 respectively. The subject lots are underlain by compacted fill soil and sedimentary formational material. Based on our observations during the grading of the site, the fill soils primarily fit Soil - Profile Type S. and the sedimentary formational material fits Soil - Profile Type S,. Fill depths under the subject pads range from 0 feet to roughly 50 feet. In our opinion, the site's Soil - Profile Type is primarily S.. Accordingly, Seismic Coefficients C. and C, are 0.40N. and 0.56N, respectively. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 6.0 SUMMARY OF GRADING OPERATIONS PROJECT NO. 0517- 003 -01 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 5 In general, the earthwork conducted at the site consisted of the grading of the pad areas, the slopes, and the street alignment. The site grades are shown on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. The project grading plans, prepared by Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. (2000), serve as a base map for the As- Graded Geotechnical Map. The grading contractor for this project was Perry & Shaw, Incorporated. Typical cut -and -fill mass grading techniques were employed using heavy earth- moving equipment. Site grading began with the removal of deleterious materials and the loose fill at the site. Fill soils were subsequently placed to bring the site up to design grades. 6.1 Preparation of Existing Ground The site was cleared of rubbish and vegetation which was hauled off -site. The loose surficial soils were generally removed to expose competent formational materials or compacted fill from the previous grading. The approximate elevations of the bottoms of the removals are indicated on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map. Prior to placing fill, the exposed surfaces were scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches. The surface was then brought to approximate optimum moisture content, and compacted. 6.2 Fill Fill soils for site grading were primarily generated from on -site excavations. The fill was placed using scrapers that spread the material in 6- to 8 -inch thick lifts. This soil was then brought to approximate optimum moisture content using a water truck, and compacted by the scrapers delivering the fill materials, and a rubber -tired compactor which also mixed and spread the fill materials. 6.3 Cut and Fill Slopes Slopes at the site were constructed to heights of up to approximately 30 feet. The slopes appeared to be constructed in general accordance with the project plans and specifications at slope ratios of 2:1 or flatter. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATr AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 PROJECT NO. 0517 -003 -01 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 6 In general, fill slopes were rolled with a sheepsfoot roller at roughly 5 -foot intervals as the fill was brought up. The face of the finish slopes were track - walked using a dozer. 6.4 Over - Excavation for Varying Fill Thickness To reduce the potential for differential settlement associated with varying fill thicknesses beneath individual pads, formational materials were over - excavated and replaced with compacted fill under some lots. In general, over - excavation of lots was conducted to reduce the differential fill thickness beneath the approximate footprint of the proposed structures. The subsurface conditions are as follow: LOT NUMBER GREATER FILL THICKNESS ft LESSER FILL THICKNESS ft DIFFERENTIAL FILL THICKNESS ft 1 15 7 8 2 13 3 10 3 17 8 9 4 16 8 8 5 8 3 5 6 8 3 5 7 3 2 1 8 30 8 22 9 50 10 40 10 50 10 40 11 12 6 6 12 8 2 6 13 1 0 1 14 1 0 1 15 1 0 1 16 1 0 1 Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517 -003 -01 DECEMBER 13.2000 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 7 7.0 LABORATORY TESTING The various materials used for fill are tabulated in Appendix B, "Laboratory Testing ". Brief descriptions of the soil types used are included. The maximum density and optimum moisture content of each soil type was determined in the laboratory using ASTM method D1557- 91(Modified Proctor) as a guideline. To evaluate materials for expansion potential at finish pad grade, laboratory testing was conducted on selected samples using ASTM test method D4829 -95 as a guideline. Selected samples were also tested for sulfate content. The results of the laboratory testing are presented in Appendix B. 8.0 FIELD DENSITY TESTING Where applicable, in -place moisture and density tests were made in general accordance with ASTM D2922 -91 and D3017 -88 (Nuclear Gauge Methods). The results of these tests are tabulated in the figures of Appendix C, "Field Density Test Results ". Appendix C also presents the relative compaction of the fill as compared to the respective maximum density. The locations and elevations of the tests shown on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map are based on field survey stakes and estimates from the grading plan topography. They should only be considered rough estimates. The estimated locations and elevations should not be utilized for the purpose of preparing cross sections showing test locations, or in any case, for the purpose of after -the -fact evaluating of the sequence of fill placement. 9.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS In our opinion, grading and compaction were performed in general accordance with the intent of the project geotechnical recommendations (Geotechnics, 1996) and with the requirements of the City of Encinitas. The conclusions and recommendations contained herein are based on the observations and testing performed between August 30 and December 7, 2000. No representations are made as to the quality and extent of materials not observed. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER l3, 2000 9.1 Fill Compaction PROJECT NO. 0517-003-01 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 8 Based upon our observations and testing, it is our professional opinion that the structural fills were placed in substantial accordance with the compaction criteria of 90 percent of the maximum density. Where field testing indicated less than the specified relative compaction the pertinent soils were reworked to achieve the specified compaction. 9.2 Slope Stability Slopes were constructed at the site to heights of up to 30 feet. Slope stability was evaluated based on the referenced geotechnical investigation (Geotechnics, 1996), and site observations of conditions exposed during grading. In general, the existing slopes should be stable with regard to deep- seated failure with a factor -of -safety of 1.5 or more. Slope analysis was based on exposed conditions and soil strength characteristics. Any changes to constructed slope heights or ratios, or addition of retaining walls or other surcharge loads, should be evaluated by Geotechnics Incorporated. Man-made and natural slopes will weather over time as a result of wetting and drying, biologic forces, and gravity. As a result, the outer 5 feet of slope face may undergo minor down -slope creep over the years. While it is not possible to completely eliminate this effect, it can be minimized by establishing deep - rooted vegetation on the slope, maintaining the drainage patterns established during construction, and by rodent control. We recommend vegetation which is adapted to semi -arid climates, therefore requiring minimal irrigation. 9.3 Site Drainage Foundation and slab performance depends greatly on how well the runoff waters drain from the site. This is true both during construction and over the entire life of the structure. The ground surface around structures should be graded so that water flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. The surface gradient needed to achieve this depends on the prevailing landscape. In general, we recommend that pavement and lawn areas within 5 feet of buildings slope away at gradients of at least 2 percent. Densely vegetated areas should Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13. 2000 PROJECT NO. 0517 -003 -01 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 9 have minimum gradients of at least 5 percent away from buildings within 5 feet of the structure's perimeter. Densely vegetated areas are considered those in which the planting type and spacing is such that the flow of water is impeded. Planters should be built so that water from them will not seep into the foundation, slab, or pavement areas. Site irrigation should be limited to the minimum necessary to sustain landscaping plants. Should excessive irrigation, water line breaks, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones or "perched" groundwater may develop in fill soils. This condition may result in excessive moisture migration into and through foundations and slabs. Damage to landscape may also occur. 10.0 FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS The following recommendations are based on the expected existing subsurface conditions. They are generally consistent with methods typically used in southern California. Other alternatives may be available. The foundation recommendations presented herein are minimum criteria based on geotechnical concerns and should not be considered to preclude more restrictive criteria of governing agencies or by the structural engineer. The design of the foundation system should be performed by the project structural engineer based on current code requirements and accepted engineering practices. Post - Tensioned Slabs Edge Moisture Variation, em Center Lift: 5.3 feet Edge Lift: 2.6 feet Differential Swell, Y. Center Lift: 1.7 inches Edge Lift: 0.6 inches Differential Settlement: 3/4 -inch Allowable Bearing Capacity: 2,000 lbs/ft' at slab subgrade Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 Conventional Foundations PROJECT NO. 0517- 003 -01 DOCUMENT NO- 0-1044 PAGE NO. 10 Allowable Soil Bearing: 2,500 lbs /ft' (allow a one -third increase for short-term wind or seismic loads) Minimum Footing Width: 12 inches Minimum Footing Depth: 18 inches below lowest adjacent soil grade Minimum Slab Thickness: 5%2 inches Differential Settlement: 3/4 -inch Lateral loads may be resisted by friction and by the passive resistance of the supporting soils. A coefficient of friction of 0.3 may be used between the bottom of footings and the supporting soils. The passive resistance of the fill soils may be assumed to be equal to the pressure developed by a fluid with a density of 300 tbs./ft. A one -third increase in the passive value may be used for wind or seismic loads. The passive resistance of the soils may be combined with the frictional resistance without reduction in evaluating the total lateral resistance. The following CBC seismic parameters may be used for design of the proposed buildings: Seismic Zone Factor, Z: 0.4 Seismic Source Type: B Soil Profile Type: SC Seismic Coefficients, C,,: 0.40Na C,: 0.56Ny Near - Source Factors, N.: 1.0 Nv: 1.2 Footings adjacent to slopes should be founded at a depth such that the distance between the lower outside edge of the footing and the face of any slope is at least 8 feet. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO, 0517-003 -01 DECEMBER 13.2000 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 11 10.1 Moisture Protection for Slabs Concrete slabs constructed on soil ultimately cause the moisture content to rise in the underlying soil. This results from continued capillary rise and the termination of normal evapotranspiration. Because normal concrete is permeable, the moisture will eventually penetrate the slab unless some protection is provided. Typical moisture protection used in southern California for interior, on -grade slabs consists of 2 inches of clean sand covered by a 20 -mil moisture barrier covered by another 2- inches of clean sand. The sand should have a minimum sand equivalent of at least 50 when tested in accordance with ASTM test method 132419. It has been our experience that such systems will transmit from approximately 6 to 12 pounds of moisture per 1000 square feet per day. It is our opinion that soil conditions do not exist that would preclude the use of the indicated moisture protection on this project. It should be recognized, however, that this system relies entirely on the integrity of the visqueen membrane. Accordingly, care should be taken to protect the visqueen against all punctures and to provide adequate overlap at all seams. If the above discussed moisture transmission is considered to be excessive for the types of floor coverings planned, further protection can be realized by adding a capillary break layer in accordance with the following alternative: 2 inches of clean sand (sand equivalent of 30 or more), over 10 mil. plastic sheeting, over 4 inches of minus 3/8 -inch crushed rock over subgrade. Another alternative would be to place a moisture barrier with a thickness greater than 20 mil directly on the subgrade, covered with at least 2 inches of clean sand. The moisture barrier should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's requirements, and any joints or laps should be throughly sealed in accordance with the manufacturer's requirements to provide a thorough seal. The concrete should have a low water - cement ratio of no greater than 0.5, and be moist -cured for at least 5 days in accordance with the methods recommended by the American Concrete Institute. Additionally, the project architect and/or a waterproofing consultant should evaluate the moisture barrier requirements based on the anticipated floor coverings and proposed use. We also recommend that a special registered Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED DECEMBER 13, 2000 PROJECT NO. 0517-003-01 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 12 inspector test and inspect the concrete placement and slab construction to confirm the recommendations herein are implemented in the field. 10.2 Exterior Slabs Reinforcement and the use of crack control joints should help reduce random cracking and differential movement. Slabs should be at least 4 inches in thickness and should be reinforced with at least 6 -inch by 6 -inch, W2.9 by W2.9 welded -wire fabric. Slabs may bear directly on compacted subgrade. Crack control joints should be provided on no greater than 5 -foot centers for sidewalks, and not greater than 8 -foot centers, each way, for slabs 10.3 Concrete Reaction The type of cement used should be based on the results of sulfate content testing of finish grade soils as reported herein, and the design criteria of the 1998 California Building Code. The sulfate content test results presented in Appendix B represent the existing soil conditions at the site. It should be noted that soluble sulfate in the irrigation water supply, and/or the use of fertilizer may cause the sulfate content in the surficial soils to increase with time. This may result in a higher sulfate exposure than that indicated by the test results reported herein. Studies have shown that the use of improved cements in the concrete, and a low water - cement ratio will increase the resistance of the concrete to sulfate exposure. 11.0 RETAINING WALLS Foundations for retaining walls may be designed using the criteria presented for conventional structures. For cantilever retaining walls, where the backfill is level or nearly level, an active earth pressure approximated by an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 lbs. /ft' may be used. Where the earth slopes upwards at 2:1, an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 lbs. /ft' may be used. The active pressure should be used for walls free to yield at the top at least 0.2 percent of the wall height. For walls restrained so that such movement is not permitted, an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 lbs. /ft' should be used, based on at -rest soil conditions with level backfill. Where the earth slopes upwards at 2:1, Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517-003-01 DECEMBER 13, 2000 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 13 an equivalent fluid pressure of 85 lbs. /ft' may be used for restrained walls. In addition to the recommended earth pressure, walls adjacent to vehicular traffic should be designed to resist a uniform lateral pressure of 1001bs. /ft2, acting as a result of an assumed 300 lbs. /ft-' surcharge behind the wall. The above pressures assume no hydrostatic pressures. If these are applicable, they will increase the lateral pressures on the wall and we should be contacted for additional recommendations. Walls should contain an adequate subdrain to reduce hydrostatic forces. Wall drain details are given in the attached Figure 2, Retaining Wall Drain Details. Backfilling retaining walls with expansive soils can increase lateral pressures well beyond the active or at -rest pressures indicated above. We recommend that retaining walls be backfilled with soil having an Expansive Index of 20 or less. The backfill area should include the zone defined by a 1:1 sloping plane, back from the base of the wall. Retaining wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction, based on Modified Proctor density. Backfill should not be placed until walls have achieved adequate structural strength. Heavy compaction equipment which could cause distress to walls should not be used. 12.0 LIMITATIONS Our services were performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. The samples taken and used for testing, the observations made and the in -place field testing performed are believed representative of the project; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between tested or observed locations. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project and incorporated into the plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. As in most major projects, conditions revealed by excavation may be at variance with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by Geotechnics Incorporated and Geotechnics Incorporated DAMP - PROOFING OR WATER- PROOFING AS REQUIRED ROCK AND FABRIC ALTERNATIVE COMPACTED \B'A'CKPILL .'. MINUS 3/4 -INCH CRUSHED ROCK ENVELOPED IN FILTER FABRIC (MIFAFI 140NL, SUPAC 4NP, OR APPROVED SIMILAR) DAMP - PROOFING OR WATER- PROOFING AS REQUIRED 4 -INCH DAM. ADS OR PVC PERFORATED PIPE - - GEOCOMPOSITE PANEL DRAIN -- 1 CU. FT. PER LINEAL FOOT OF MINUS 3/4 -INCH CRUSHED ROCK ENVELOPED IN FILTER FABRIC. 4 -INCH DIAM. ADS OR PVC PERFORATED PIPE 12 °MiR COMPAGTED BACkMLL' NOTES PANEL DRAIN ALTERNATIVE 12 -INCH MINIMUM 1) Perforated pipe should outlet through a solid pipe to a free gravity outfall. Perforated pipe and outlet pipe should have a fall of at least 1 %. 2) As an alternative to the perforated pipe and outlet, weep holes may be included in the bottom of the wall. Weepholes should be at least 2 inches in diameter, and be spaced no greater than 8 feet. 3) Filter fabric should consist of Mirafi 140N, Supac 5NP, Amoco 4599, or similar approved fabric. Filter fabric should be overlapped at least 6- inches. 4) Geocomposite panel drain should consist of Miradrain 6000, J -DRain 400, Supac DS -15, or approved similar product. 5) Drain installation should be observed by the geotechnical consultant prior to backfilling �G e o t e c h n i c s I RETAINING WALL DRAIN DETAIL I Project No. 0517- 003 -01 Document No. 0 -1044 - Incorporated FIGURE 2 BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517 -003 -01 DECEMBER 13, 2000 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1044 PAGE NO. 14 designs adjusted as required or alternate designs recommended. Although our observations and testing did not reveal deficiencies, we do not guarantee the contractor's work, nor do the services provided by Geotechnics relieve the contractor of responsibility in the event of subsequently discovered defects in his work. Changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. ssr GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED �J Dick Robe ` Project Geologist ALee anderhurst, C.E.G. 1125 Principal F� W. LEE "�' YANDERNl1RST No. 1125 • CERTIFIED .n ENGINEERING Z ' F� Robert A. Torres, P.E. 43077 Principal Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. C 40333 Principal A. Tog rn a: Kom EXP.3.3I•o4 Q k civil. c�a \F C Geotechnics Incorporated APPENDIX A REFERENCES American Society for Testing and Materials, 1992, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4, Construction, Volume 04.08 Soil and Rock; Dimension Stone; Geosynthetics, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1296 p. California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, 1998, Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions ofNevada: International Conference of Building Officials, Sheet 0 -36. Geotechnics Incorporated, 1996, Geotechnical Investigation, Encinitas Ranch, Encinitas, California: Project No. 0054- 002 -00, Document No. 5 -0588, dated January 19. Geotechnics Incorporated, 1998, As- Graded Geotechnical Report, Encinitas Ranch, Encinitas, California: Project No. 0054- 002 -02, Document No. 6 -0620, dated March 31. Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, Proposal for Geotechnical Services, North Mesa - Lower, Encinitas Ranch: Project No. 0517- 003 -01, Document No. 0 -0890, dated August 24. Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, Interim As- Graded Report, North Mesa - Lower, Lots 1 through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and Lot 16, Encinitas Ranch: Project No. 0517- 003 -01, Document No. 0 -1082, dated October 13. Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, Foundation Plan Review, North Mesa - Lower, Lots 1 through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and Lot 16, Encinitas Ranch: Project No. 0517- 003 -01, Document No. 0 -1087, dated October 16. Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, R -Value Test Results and Preliminary Pavement Section Recommendations, North Mesa - Lower, Encinitas, California: Project No. 0517- 003 -01, Document No. 0 -1098, dated October 18. Jennings, C. W. 1994, Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas with Locations and Ages of Recent Volcanic Eruptions: California Division of Mines and Geology, Geologic Data Map Series, Map No. 6. Mualchin, L., and Jones, A.L., 1992, Peak Accelerations from Maximum Credible Earthquakes in California (Rock and Stiff -Soils Sites): California Division of Mines and Geology, Open - File Report, 92 -1. Hunsaker & Associates San Diego Inc., 2000, Grading and Improvement Plans for North Mesa - Lower: WO 0294 -0132, BIN 1080 -A, 9 sheets. Geotechnics Incorporated APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Selected samples of soils encountered during the earthwork construction were tested using generally accepted testing standards. The soils selected for testing are believed to be generally representative of the materials encountered during the earthwork construction at the site; however variations may occur in the soils at the site between test locations. Laboratory testing was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in the same locality. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the correctness or serviceability of the test results or the conclusions derived from these tests. Where a specific laboratory test method has been referenced, such as ASTM, Caltrans, or AASHTO, the reference applies only to the specified laboratory test method and not to associated referenced test method(s) or practices, and the test method referenced has been used only as a guidance document for the general performance of the test and not as a "Test Standard." A brief description of the tests performed follows: Classification: Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System as established by the American Society of Civil Engineers. Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture: The maximum densities and optimum moisture contents of representative soil samples were determined by using test method ASTM 131557 -91, modified Proctor. Rock corrections were applied in accordance with ASTM D4718. The test results are summarized in Figure B -1. Sulfate Content: To assess the potential for reactivity with below grade concrete, selected soil samples were tested for water - soluble sulfate content using method SME W W4500So4E. The results are presented as a percentage by weight on Figure B -1. Expansion Index: The expansion potential of selected soils was characterized by using the test method ASTM D4829 -95. The results are presented in Figure B -2. Geotechnics Incorporated MAXIMUM DENSITY /OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D1557 -91) SAMPLE NO. DESCRIPTION MAXIMUM DENSITY (PCF) OPTIMUM MOISTURE ( %) 1 Reddish brown silty sand (SM) 128 10 2 Brown clayey sand (SC) 128 9 3 Yellow brown clayey sand (SC) 124 8%2 4 Dark brown clayey sand (SC) 129% 9 5 Yellow brown clayey sand (SC) 124'/2 10%2 6 Yellow brown silty sand (SM) 118 %2 13'/2 7 Light brown silty sand (SW 107 15'/2 8 Darl brown silty sand (SM) with gravel 124 11 %2 SULFATE CONTENT SAMPLE NUMBER SAMPLE LOCATION REPRESENTING LOTS SULFATE CONTENT S -1 Lot 1 Lot 1 0.01 S -2 Lot 2 Lots 2 through 5 0.02 S -3 Lot 8 Lots 7 through 9 0.03 S -4 Lot 11 Lots 10 through 12 0.03 S -5 Lot 14 Lots 13, 14, and 16 0.02 S -6 Lot 6 Lot 6 0.02 S -7 Lot 15 Lot 15 0.02 G e o t e c h n i c s Laboratory Test Results `Incorporated Project No. 0517- 003 -01 Document No. 0 -1044 Figure B -1 EXPANSION INDEX TESTS (ASTM D4829 -95) LOT NUMBER EXPANSION INDEX EXPANSION POTENTIAL 1 0 Very Low 2 0 Very Low 3 0 Very Low 4 0 Very Low 5 0 Very Low 6 0 Very Low 7 0 Very Low 8 0 Very Low 9 0 Very Low 10 0 Very Low 11 0 Very Low 12 0 Very Low 13 0 Very Low 14 0 Very Low 15 0 Very Low 16 0 Ve Low UBC TABLE NO. 29-C, CLASSIFICATION OF EXPANSIVE SOIL EXPANSION INDEX POTENTIAL EXPANSION 0 -20 Very Low 21 -50 Low 51 -90 Medium 91 -130 High Above 130 Very High G e o t e c h n i c s Laboratory Test Results `Incorporated Project No. 0517- 003 -01 Document No. 0 -10444 Figure B-2 APPENDIX C FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS In -place moisture and density tests were made in accordance with ASTM D2922 -91 and D3017 -88 (Nuclear Gauge Method). The results of these tests are tabulated in the Figures C -1 and C -2, "Field Density Test Results ". The approximate test locations are presented on the As- Graded Geotechnical Map. The locations and elevations indicated for the tests presented on the plates are based on field survey stakes and estimates from the grading plan topography, and should only be considered rough estimates. The estimated locations and elevations should not be utilized for the purpose of preparing cross sections showing test locations, or in any case, for the purpose of after -the -fact evaluating of the sequence of fill placement. The precision of the field density test and the maximum dry density test is not exact and variations should be expected. For example, the American Society for Testing and Materials has recently researched the precision of ASTM Method No. D1557 and found the accuracy of the maximum dry density to be plus or minus 4 percent of the mean value and the optimum moisture content to be accurate to plus or minus 15 percent of the mean value; the Society specifically states the "acceptable range of test results expressed as a percent of mean value" is the range stated above. In effect, an indicated relative compaction of 90 percent has an acceptable range of 86.6 to 92.8 percent based on the maximum dry density determination. Geotechnics Incorporated G e o t e c h n i c s DENSITY TEST RESULTS Project No. 0517- 003 -01 -f n c o r p o r a t e d North Mesa -Lower Document No. 0 -1044 114.9 Barratt American FIGURE C -1 NU 2 Test Test Elevation Soil Max. Dry Moisture Dry Relative Required Retest Test No. Date IN Type Density Content Density Compaction Compaction Number Method 2 128.0 9.5 115.1 [pct/ N [pctl 1 %] [°h1 288 2 1 9/12/00 284 1 128.0 11.3 114.9 90 90 NU 2 9/12/00 286 1 128.0 11.8 114.7 90 90 NU 3 9/12/00 294 1 128.0 12.1 115.1 90 90 NU 4 9/12/00 287 2 128.0 9.5 115.1 90 90 NU 5 9/12/00 288 2 128.0 9.3 115.8 90 90 NU 6 9/13/00 295 2 128.0 10.5 117.4 92 90 NU 7 9/13/00 290 2 128.0 9.3 114.9 90 90 NU 8 9/13/00 292 1 128.0 12.1 116.1 91 90 NU 9 9/13/00 297 1 128.0 10.1 115.4 90 90 NU 10 9/13100 305 1 128.0 8.1 111.2 87 90 11 NU 11 9/13/00 305 1 128.0 10.4 116.2 91 90 NU 12 9/13/00 300 4 129.5 9.3 116.9 90 90 NU 13 9/13/00 303 4 129.5 9.1 118.4 91 90 NU 14 9/13/00 304 1 128.0 11.0 114.6 90 90 NU 15 9/13/00 306 1 128.0 12.5 115.5 90 90 NU 16 9/13100 307 1 128.0 8.1 109.4 85 90 17 NU 17 9/13/00 307 1 128.0 13.1 115.7 90 90 NU 18 9/13/00 308 4 129.5 9.9 119.5 92 90 NU 19 9/14/00 309 4 129.5 10.5 119.5 92 90 NU 20 9/14/00 310 1 128.0 13.8 114.8 90 90 NU 21 9/14100 309 1 128.0 12.1 115.9 91 90 NU 22 9/14/00 310 1 128.0 11.8 115.8 90 90 NU 23 9/14/00 308 3 124.0 10.8 111.3 90 90 NU 24 9/14/00 309 3 124.0 10.9 111.0 90 90 NU 25 9/14/00 310 1 128.0 13.3 115.8 90 90 NU 26 9/14100 311 2 128.0 9.1 116.2 91 90 NU 27 9/14/00 312 2 128.0 9.5 118.6 93 90 NU 28 9/14/00 311 1 128.0 11.4 116.3 91 90 NU 29 9/15/00 312 5 124.5 11.4 112.3 90 90 NU 30 9/15/00 305 3 124.0 10.5 114.5 92 90 NU 31 9115/00 296 3 124.0 10.0 114.7 93 90 NU 32 9/15100 294 5 124.5 11.3 114.3 92 90 NU 33 9/15/00 299 5 124.5 14.7 111.8 90 90 NU 34 9/15/00 299 1 128.0 10.4 115.5 90 90 NU 35 9/15/00 298 1 128.0 10.0 116.7 91 90 NU 36 9/15/00 300 1 128.0 10.8 116.2 91 90 NU 37 9/18/00 315 3 124.0 8.4 112.6 91 90 NU 38 9/18/00 304 4 129.5 11.4 117.1 90 90 NU 39 9/18100 305 1 128.0 12.8 116.8 91 90 NU 40 9/18/00 303 3 124.0 8.8 114.3 92 90 NU 41 9118/00 309 5 124.5 11.8 112.3 90 90 NU 42 9/18/00 305 5 124.5 10.5 112.9 91 90 NU 43 9/18/00 314 3 124.0 9.1 111.5 90 90 NU 44 9/18/00 313 5 124.5 10.6 112.1 90 90 NU 45 9/18/00 309 3 124.0 8.8 111.6 90 90 NU 46 9/18100 310 5 124.5 10.6 111.9 90 90 NU 47 9/19/00 313 5 124.5 10.9 113.1 91 90 NU 48 9/19/00 311 5 124.5 11.3 112.8 91 90 NU 49 9/19/00 314 3 124.0 10.7 112.7 91 90 NU 50 9/20/00 315 5 124.5 13.4 115.5 93 90 NU 51 9/20/00 316 5 124.5 14.1 112.5 90 90 NU e o t e c h n i c s DENSITY TEST RESULTS Project No. 0517 - 003 -01 AN 1 n c o r p o r a t e d North Mesa -Lower Document No. 0 -1044 112.7 Barran American FIGURE C -2 NU 53 Test Test Elevation Soil Max. Dry Moisture Dry Relative Required Retest Test No Date [ft] Type Density Content Density Compaction 1 Compaction Number Method 3 124.0 10.8 111.3 [pcfl [ %] [pcfl f %] 1%1 317 5 52 9/20/00 316 5 124.5 11.2 112.7 91 90 NU 53 9/20/00 317 5 124.5 11.1 113.5 91 90 NU 54 9/21/00 318 3 124.0 9.1 112.5 91 90 NU 55 9/21100 319 3 124.0 10.8 111.3 90 90 NU 56 9/21/00 317 5 124.5 9.2 114.5 92 90 NU 57 9/26 /00 310 3 124.0 10.4 112.1 90 90 NU 58 9/26/00 306 3 124.0 9.9 111.8 90 90 NU 59 9/26/00 300 3 124.0 8.4 112.7 91 90 NU 60 9/26/00 299 3 124.0 9.6 112.3 91 90 NU 61 9/27/00 311 3 124.0 9.4 112.1 90 90 NU 62 9/27/00 316 5 124.5 11.8 113.4 91 90 NU 63 9/27100 301 3 124.0 9.9 112.8 91 90 NU 64 9/27/00 313 5 124.5 10.8 112.5 90 90 NU 65 10/6/00 322 3 124.0 9.6 114.1 92 90 NU 66 1016/00 319 5 124.5 10.6 114.6 92 90 NU 67 10/6/00 319 5 124.5 11.2 113.2 91 90 NU 68 10/6100 318 5 124.5 9.9 112.5 90 90 NU 69 10/6/00 317 5 124.5 8.4 112.3 90 90 NU 70 10/6/00 316 5 124.5 10.6 113.0 91 90 NU 71 10/6/00 319 5 124.5 10.1 112.9 91 90 NU 72 10/6/00 314 5 124.5 9.7 114.6 92 90 NU 73 1016/00 313 5 124.5 9.4 113.1 91 90 NU 74 10/6/00 313 3 124.0 8.0 112.6 91 90 NU 75 10/6/00 314 3 124.0 8.9 112.4 91 90 NU 76 1216/00 312 2 128.0 9.0 117.4 92 90 NU 77 12/6/00 313 2 128.0 8.9 116.5 91 90 NU 78 12/6/00 314 2 128.0 8.4 117.2 92 90 NU 79 1216/00 315 2 128.0 8.7 117.8 92 90 NU 80 1217100 314 3 124.0 9.0 113.4 91 90 NU 81 12/7/00 315 3 124.0 9.2 112.7 91 90 NU 82 12/7100 316 3 124.0 9.2 115.9 93 90 NU = Geotechnics Incorporated Principals: Anthony R Belfast Michael P. Imbrigtio W. Lee Vanderhurst REPORT OF COMPACTION TEST RESULTS NORTH MESA -LOWER AT ENCINITAS RANCH UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA prepared for Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 Carlsbad, California 92009 by GEOTECIINICSINCORPORATED Project No. 0517- 003 -01 Document No. 1 -0063 August 10, 2001 9245 Activity Rd., Ste. 103 • San Diego, California 92126 Phone (858) 5361000 • Fax (858) 536 -8311 = Geotechnics Incorporated August 10, 2001 Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Mr. Richard Sanchez SUBJECT: REPORT OF COMPACTION TEST RESULTS North Mesa -Lower Utility and Street Improvements Encinitas, California Gentlemen: Principals: Anthony F. Belfast Michael P. Imbriglio W. Lee Vanderhurst Project No. 0517- 003 -01 Document No. 1 -0063 This report summarizes the results of the observation and testing services provided during the installation of the improvements at the North Mesa -Lower development in Encinitas Ranch. In our opinion, the earthwork construction and compaction performed to date was conducted in general accordance with the intent of the project geotechnical recommendations and with the requirements of the City of Encinitas. We appreciate this opportunity to provide professional services. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report or the services provided, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Robert A. Torres Principal DRIRAT /AFB Distribution: (5) Addressee (2) Mr. Jim Knowlton, City of Encinitas 9245 Activity Rd., Ste. 103 • San Diego, California 92126 Phone (858) 536 -1000 • Fax (858) 536 -8311 REPORT OF COMPACTION TEST RESULTS NORTH MESA -LOWER AT ENCINITAS RANCH UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA IL1":3 a X11 11 931" K9 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................ ..............................1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ....................... ..............................1 K3Iil1Mby1�i7;�lYl • a 4.0 PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS ................. ............................... 2 5.0 BACKFILL ................................. ..............................2 7.0 PAVING ................................... ..............................3 8.0 RETAINING WALLS ........................ ..............................4 9.0 LABORATORY TESTING ................... ............................... 4 I[ �3L�7�Ig1�� ]a]P1►1.71M'rM�I.�1I�L 11.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND CONCLUSIONS ........................ 5 12.0 LIMITATIONS ............................. ..............................5 ILLUSTRATIONS Site Location Map - Figure 1 Geotechnical Site Plan - Plates 1 through 3 APPENDICES REFERENCES ...................... ............................... Appendix A LABORATORY TESTING ............. ............................... Appendix B FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS ...... ............................... Appendix C REPORT OF COMPACTION TEST RESULTS NORTH MESA -LOWER AT ENCINITAS RANCH UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of the observation and testing services provided during the installation of the utility and street improvements at the North Mesa -Lower development in Encinitas Ranch. The purpose of the observation and testing services was to obtain information on which to base our professional opinions regarding the conformance of the earthwork construction with the project plans and specifications. Our services were provided in accordance with our Proposal No. 0 -028 ( Geotechnccs Incorporated, 2000). 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES Field personnel were provided for this project to observe the installation of the public improvements. Field and laboratory testing was conducted to support field observations. The observation and testing assisted us in developing professional opinions regarding the earthwork construction. Our services did not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees, or agents. Our services included the following: • Preparation of geotechnical recommendations as- needed during the earthwork construction. Supplemental recommendations, as well as other pertinent reports, are listed in the attached References (Appendix A). • Laboratory testing to determine pertinent engineering characteristics of the soil. The laboratory test results are summarized in Appendix B. • Observation and testing of the underground utility and wall backfill, and observation and testing of the placement of the pavement sections. The field density test results and relative compaction comparisons are summarized in Appendix C. The approximate test locations are shown on the Geotechnical Site Plan, Plates 1 through 3. • Preparation of this report which summarizes our findings, opinions and conclusions. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517 -003 -01 AUGUST 10, 2001 DOCUMENT NO. 1 -0063 PAGE NO. 2 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located in the northern part of the Encinitas Ranch development (Figure 1, Site Location Map), along the west side of Quail Gardens Drive. The site encompasses roughly 7 acres of mesa top that was previously used for agricultural purposes. The site was graded in the year 2000 to result in 16, single - family house pads situated along the alignment of a new residential street ( Geotechnccs, 2000). The grading also resulted in easements for water and sanitary sewer mains. 4.0 PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS The project improvements included the installation of underground utilities, a street section, and a retaining wall. The underground utilities included a storm drain system, sanitary sewer system, potable water main and laterals, and a joint -use trench for power and cable services. The street alignment, named Lauren Court, included preparation of the sidewalk, curb -and- gutter, and pavement subgrade; and the placement of base, asphalt concrete paving, and decorative portland cement concrete pavement. The retaining wall was installed along the backside of Lot 12. 5.0 BACKFILL Backfill was placed in the various trench excavations for underground utilities and behind the retaining wall. The improvements are shown on the Geotechnical Site Plan, Plates 1 through 3. The installation of the storm drain, sanitary sewer, and water utilities were performed by Prime Time Construction. The joint -use utilities were constructed by Schilling Contracting. The retaining wall was backfilled by Earl Powers Company. In general, the material used for backftll was derived from on -site excavations. Some material was imported to the site to bed the various pipelines and as free - draining material behind the retaining wall. The excavated material and the imported material were generally moisture conditioned, placed in lifts up to 1' /z feet thick, and compacted. The bedding material was generally flooded into place. Geotechnics Incorporated Reference: Thomas Brothers Guide 2000. G e o t e c h n i c s Project No. 0517- 003 -01 = Incorporated SITE LOCATION MAP Document No. 1 -0063 FIGURE 1 Rev 6/99 BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517 - 003 -01 AUGUST 10, 2001 DOCUMENT NO. I -0063 PAGE NO. 3 Compactive effort was applied using sheepsfoot rollers mounted on excavators, wheel - rolling by loaders, or by hand -held whackers. Compaction of the retaining wall backfill was accomplished using a walk- behind studded steel -wheel roller and hand -held whackers. 6.0 PAVING Flexible and decorative pavement sections were constructed for Lauren Court. Recommendations for the pavement sections were based on R -value test results conducted on the prepared street subgrades (Geotechnics, 2000). The curb- and - gutters, cross gutters, sidewalks, flexible and decorative pavement sections were constructed by R.E. Hazard Construction Company. The various subgrades were typically trimmed to grade and re- compacted using vibratory rollers. Some aggregate base materials were placed to make the subgrade for the curb- and -gutter sections. The base was placed generally using skip loaders and a motor grader. Compaction of the base for the subgrade and the street sections was applied using vibratory drum rollers. The asphalt concrete was placed using spreaders and skiploaders. Compaction ofthe asphalt concrete was accomplished using vibratory rollers and rubber -tired compactors. 7.0 RETAINING WALL The retaining wall behind Lot 12 was constructed to heights of up to 5 Meet. The retaining wall included a backdrain consisting of crushed rock wrapped in filter fabric. The drain generally occupied the space between the wall and backcut to within 2 feet of the top of the wall. The upper 2 feet were backfilled using onsite materials. These materials were typically brought to near optimum moisture content, placed in lifts up to 1 -foot thick, and compacted using vibratory sheepsfoot rollers and hand -held whackers. 8.0 LABORATORY TESTING The various materials used for fill, backfJll, and the pavement sections are tabulated in Figure B -1 of Appendix B, "Laboratory Testing ". Brief descriptions of the soil types used are included. The maximum density and optimum moisture content of each soil type was evaluated in the laboratory Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517-003-01 AUGUST 10, 2001 DOCUMENT NO. 1 -0063 PAGE NO.4 in general accordance with ASTM method D1557 -91 (Modified Proctor). The fills generally consisted of clayey to silty sand (SC and SM, respectively). The sand equivalent of soils imported for use in bedding the water main was evaluated in general accordance with ASTM method D2419. The Hveem unit weight of asphalt concrete used at the site was evaluated in general accordance with CALTRANS 304 test methods. 9.0 FIELD DENSITY TESTING In -place moisture and density tests were made in general accordance with ASTM D2922 -91 and D3017 -88 (Nuclear Gauge Method). The results of these tests are tabulated in the figures of Appendix C, "Field Density Test Results ". Appendix C also presents the relative compaction of the backfill or pavement sections as compared to the respective maximum density (ASTM D 1557 -91), or the relative compaction of the asphaltic concrete as compared to the Hveem density ( CALTRANS 304). The locations and elevations indicated for the tests presented on the Geotechnical Site Plan (Plates 1 through 3), are based on field survey stakes and estimates from the grading plan topography and should only be considered rough estimates. The estimated locations and elevations should not be utilized for the purpose of preparing cross sections showing test locations, or in any case, for the purpose of after -the -fact evaluating of the sequence of fill placement. 10.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND CONCLUSIONS In our opinion, grading and compaction were performed in general accordance with the intent of the project geotechnical recommendations and supplemental recommendations (Geotechnics, various), and with the requirements of the City of Encinitas. The conclusions contained herein are based on the observations and testing performed between October 12, 2000, and July 23, 2001. No representations are made as to the quality and extent of materials not observed. Based upon our observations and testing, it is our professional opinion that backfill soils were placed in substantial accordance with the compaction criteria of 90 percent of the maximum density as determined by ASTM D1557 -91, with the exception of the street subgrades, base, and asphalt Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517- 003 -01 AUGUST 10, 2001 DOCUMENT NO. 1 -0063 PAGE NO. 5 sections which were in substantial accordance with the compaction criteria of 95 percent of the maximum density. Generally, where field testing indicated less than the specified relative compaction, the pertinent soils were reworked to achieve the specified compaction. 11.0 LIMITATIONS Our services were performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. The samples taken and used for testing, the observations made and the in -place field testing performed are believed representative of the project; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between tested or observed locations. As in most major projects, conditions revealed by excavation may be at variance with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by Geotechnics Incorporated and designs adjusted as required or alternate designs recommended. Although our observations and testing did not reveal deficiencies, we do not guarantee the contractor's work, nor do the services provided by Geotechnics relieve the contractor of responsibility in the event of subsequently discovered defects in his work. Geotechnics Incorporated BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED AUGUST 10, 2001 PROJECT NO. 0517- 003 -01 DOCUMENT NO. 1.0063 PAGE NO. 6 The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. tws GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED l� Dick Rober'fs Robert A. Torres, P.E. 43077 Project Geologist Principal Reviewed by: OQ�QFES$ cow O��S A r It CW301T w EXP. - 1'04 9J. efvl%. OF? Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. 40333 OF C A4�� Principal Geotechnics Incorporated APPENDIX A REFERENCES American Society for Testing and Materials, 1992, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4, Construction, Volume 04.08 Soil and Rock; Dimension Stone; Geosynthetics, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1296 p. Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, Proposal for Geotechnical Services, North Mesa - Lower, Encinitas Ranch: Project No. 0517- 003 -01, Document No. 0 -0890, dated August 24. Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, R -Value Test Results and Preliminary Pavement Section Recommendations, North Mesa - Lower, Encinitas, California: Project No. 0517- 003 -01, Document No. 0 -1098, dated October 18. Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, As- Graded Geotechnical Report, North Mesa- Lower, Encinitas Ranch, Encinitas, California: Project No. 0517- 003 -01, Document No. 0 -1044, dated December 13. Geotechnics Incorporated, 2000, R -Value Test Results and Pavement Section Recommendations, North Mesa - Lower, Encinitas, California: Project No. 0517- 003 -01, Document No. 0 -1348, dated December 27. Hunsaker & Associates San Diego Inc., 2000, Grading and Private Improvement Plans for: Encinitas Ranch North Mesa - Lower, TM No. 98 -171: WO 0294 -0132, BIN 1080 -A, 18 sheets. Geotechnics Incorporated APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Selected representative samples of soils encountered were tested using test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials, or other generally accepted standards. A brief description of the tests performed follows: Classification: Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System, in general accordance with ASTM D2487. Sand Equivalent: The sand equivalent was evaluated in general accordance with ASTM D2419. The results are presented in Figure B -1. Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture: The maximum densities and optimum moisture contents of soil samples used in the backfills and pavement subgrade and base were evaluated in accordance with test method ASTM D1557-91, modified Proctor. The test results are summarized in Figure B- 1. Hveem Unit Weight, Asphalt Concrete: The unit weight of the asphalt concrete was evaluated in general accordance with CAL 340. The results are presented on Figure B -1. Geotechnics Incorporated SAND EQUIVALENT (ASTM D2419) SAMPLE NUMBER SAND EQUIVALENT TCORRESPONDING MAXIMUM DENSITY SAMPLE NUMBER 1 56 9 2 66 10 MAXIMUM DENSITY /OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D1557 -91) SAMPLE NO. DESCRIPTION MAXIMUM DENSITY (PCF) OPTIMUM MOISTURE ( %) 1 Reddish brown silty sand (SM) 128 10 2 Brown clayey sand (SC) 128 9 3 Yellow brown clayey sand (SC) 124 8%2 4 Dark brown clayey sand (SC) 129% 9 5 Yellow brown clayey sand (SC) 124'/2 10'/2 6 Yellow brown silty sand (SM) 118'/2 13'/2 7 Light brown silty sand (SM) 107 15'/2 8 Dark brown silty sand (SM) with gravel 124 11'/2 9 Light brown silty fine sand (SM) 105 %2 14 10 Light grayish brown silty sand (SM) 125 11 %2 11 Light brown clayey sand (SC) 128 10'/2 12 Aggregate base 133 7 13 Aggregate base 136%2 8 Project No. 0517- 003 -0I G e o t e c h n i c s Laboratory Test Results Document No. 1 -0063 = Incorporated North Mesa -Lower Figure B-1 Barratt American ]ncorporated HVEEM UNIT WEIGHT (CAL 304) SAMPLE NUMBER I SAMPLE DESCRIPTION I HVEEM UNIT WEIGHT PCF AC -1 '/< -inch 142.6 AC -2 % -inch 142.1 Project No. 0517- 003 -01 G e o t e c h n i c s Laboratory Test Results Document No. 1 -0063 `I n c o r p orate d North Mesa -Lower Figure B -2 Barratt American Incorporated APPENDIX C FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS In -place moisture and density tests were made in general accordance with ASTM D2922 -91 and D3017 -88 (Nuclear Gauge Method). The results of these tests are tabulated in the Figures C -1 through C -3, "Field Density Test Results ". The approximate test locations are presented on the attached Geotechnical Site Plan, Plates 1 through 3. The locations and elevations indicated for the tests presented on the plates are based on field survey stakes and estimates from the grading plan topography, and should only be considered rough estimates. The estimated locations and elevations should not be utilized for the purpose of preparing cross sections showing test locations, or in any case, for the purpose of after -the -fact evaluating of the sequence of fill placement. The precision of the field density test and the maximum dry density test is not exact and variations should be expected. For example, the American Society for Testing and Materials has recently researched the precision of ASTM Method No. D1557 and found the accuracy of the maximum dry density to be plus or minus 4 percent of the mean value and the optimum moisture content to be accurate to plus or minus 15 percent of the mean value; the Society specifically states the "acceptable range of test results expressed as a percent of mean value" is the range stated above. In effect, an indicated relative compaction of 90 percent has an acceptable range of 86.6 to 92.8 percent based on the maximum dry density determination. The precision of the field density test ASTM DI 556 has not yet been determined by the American Society for Testing and Materials; however, it must be recognized that it also is subject to variations in accuracy. Explanation SS Sanitary Sewer Trench Backfill SD Storm Drain Trench Backfill W Potable Water Trench Backfill JT Joint Trench Backfill WB Retaining Wall Backfill SG Subgrade CG Curb - and - Gutter Subgrade B Base AC Asphalt Concrete SW Sidewalk Subgrade Iddsh� G e o t e c h n i c s DENSITY TEST RESULTS Project No. 0517- 003 -01 ` n c o r p o r a t e d North Mesa -Lower Document No. 1 -0063 12.5 Barratt American FIGURE C -1 90 Test Test Elevation Location/ Soil Max. Dry Moisture Dry Relative Required Retest No. Date [ft] Staton Type Density Content Dens{i�ty Compaction Compaction Number 307 25 +60 6 118.5 13.0 112.4 95 90 SS -5 10/23/00 308 SS -1 10/20/00 310 27 +19 1 128.0 12.5 118.3 92 90 SS -2 10/20/00 308 27 +79 6 118.5 15.8 107.6 91 90 SS -3 10/20100 310 26 +89 6 118.5 15.3 108.6 92 90 SS4 10/23/00 307 25 +60 6 118.5 13.0 112.4 95 90 SS -5 10/23/00 308 24 +78 3 124.0 10.3 113.6 92 90 SS-6 10/23/00 307 31 +48 6 118.5 14.9 107.1 90 90 SS -7 10/24/00 309 14 +06 3 124.0 11.1 115.0 93 90 SS -8 10/24/00 310 14 +87 3 124.0 8.9 121.1 98 90 SS -9 10/24100 311 13 +78 1 128.0 12.9 116.1 91 90 SS-10 10/25/00 314 13 +00 3 124.0 9.7 111.1 90 90 SS -11 10/25/00 317 10 +96 3 124.0 9.6 114.8 93 90 SS -12 10/25/00 317 11 +44 3 124.0 9.9 114.6 92 90 SS-13 10/25/00 316 11 +89 3 124.0 9.9 115.5 93 90 SS -14 10/25/00 313 12 +17 3 124.0 10.1 114.0 92 90 SS -15 10/26/00 314 11 +00 5 124.5 10.9 114.5 92 90 SS -16 10/26/00 311 12 +00 5 124.5 10.1 117.5 94 90 SS -17 10/26/00 312 12 +06 5 124.5 11.3 115.3 93 90 SS -18 10/26/00 309 14 +69 6 118.5 14.0 109.0 92 90 SS-19 11/1/00 310 26 +13 6 118.5 12.7 110.8 94 90 SS -20 11/1/00 308 31 +05 6 118.5 14.0 117.1 99 90 SS-21 11/1100 308 31 +05 6 118.5 14.3 116.8 99 90 SS -22 12/11/00 311 13 +30 6 118.5 13.3 109.6 92 90 SS -23 12/11/00 314 13 +30 6 118.5 13.7 114.2 96 90 SS -24 1/5/01 310 Lots 6/7 1 128.0 14.6 115.9 91 90 SS-25 1/5/01 312 Lots 6/7 1 128.0 12.2 116.4 91 90 SS -26 1 /5/01 311 Lots 6/7 1 128.0 11.9 115.9 91 90 SS -27 1/5/01 313 Lots 617 1 128.0 11.4 117.0 91 90 SS -28 4113101 313 Lot 12 6 118.5 11.2 106.8 90 90 SS -29 4113101 310 Lot 13 6 118.5 13.0 109.3 92 90 SS -30 4/13101 310 Lot 14 3 124.0 10.5 112.0 90 90 SS -31 4/13101 312 Lot 15 3 124.0 10.7 112.5 91 90 SS -32 4/13/01 313 Lot 16 3 124.0 9.9 111.0 90 90 SS-33 4/13/01 316 Lot 3 5 124.5 12.6 112.9 91 90 SD -1 11115/00 309 10 +20 7 107.0 16.6 100.2 94 90 SD -2 11115/00 310 11 +10 5 124.5 13.0 112.7 91 90 SD -3 11/15/00 312 10 +70 2 128.0 8.7 118.0 92 90 SD-4 11/22/00 307 10 +00 6 118.5 12.9 113.6 96 90 SD -5 11/22/00 308 11 +27 2 128.0 8.9 115.2 90 90 W -1 1117/00 316 11 +20 7 107.0 13.1 105.3 98 90 W -2 11/7100 318 11 +40 3 124.0 10.5 111.9 90 90 W -3 11 /7/00 309 51 +00 7 107.0 19.1 97.6 91 90 W -4 11/7/00 312 51 +40 3 124.0 10.5 114.4 92 90 W -5 11/8/00 309 51 +80 3 124.0 12.0 113.1 91 90 W -6 11/8/00 310 52 +36 3 124.0 11.9 117.5 95 90 W -7 11/8/00 311 50 +00 5 124.5 9.8 114.6 92 90 W -8 11/8/00 311 50 +00 5 124.5 9.9 111.8 90 90 W -9 11/8/00 311 12 +83 7 107.0 10.3 95.8 90 90 W -10 11/8/00 312 12 +45 5 124.5 10.7 113.9 91 90 W -11 11/8/00 315 13 +14 5 124.5 9.8 116.7 94 90 W -12 11/15/00 312 13 +05 3 124.0 8.8 112.0 90 90 Amph6l G e o t e c h n i c s DENSITY TEST RESULTS Project No. 0517- 003 -01 �I n c o r p o r a t e d North Mesa -Lower Document No. 1 -0063 9.6 Barratt American FIGURE C -2 90 Test Test Elevation Location/ Soil Max. Dry Moisture Dry Relative Required Ratest No. Date [h] Station Type Density Content Density Compaction I Compaction Number 312 14 +67 5 124.5 11.6 [pc1] [ %] Ipcq W -17 [ %] 311 W -13 11115/00 312 13 +15 3 124.0 9.6 112.4 91 90 W -14 11/15100 312 13 +63 3 124.0 9.2 114.5 92 90 W -15 11/29/00 310 14 +62 7 107.0 16.7 96.7 90 90 W -16 11/29/00 312 14 +67 5 124.5 11.6 112.7 91 90 W -17 11129/00 311 15 +15 7 107.0 17.0 97.2 91 90 W -18 11/29/00 313 15 +15 5 124.5 11.5 111.7 90 90 W -19 11/29/00 313 13 +74 5 124.5 12.0 113.3 91 90 W -20 11/29/00 312 13 +67 7 107.0 16.8 95.8 90 90 W -21 11/29/00 313 11 +40 7 107.0 17.0 97.3 91 90 W -22 11/29/00 315 11 +55 5 124.5 12.2 112.2 90 90 W -23 11/29/00 312 12 +75 7 107.0 17.0 97.2 91 90 W -24 11/29/00 314 12 +95 5 124.5 12.2 112.6 90 90 W -25 12/4/00 315 10 +26 7 107.0 12.0 96.3 90 90 W -26 12/4/00 307 8 +25 8 124.0 11.0 106.9 86 90 W -30 W -27 1214100 309 7 +60 8 124.0 12.1 109.9 89 90 W -31 W -28 12/5/00 306 6 +64 8 124.0 10.8 114.5 92 90 W -29 1215100 309 5 +70 8 124.0 7.2 111.3 90 90 W -30 12/14/00 307 8 +25 8 124.0 9.9 113.2 91 90 W -31 12/14/00 309 7 +60 8 124.0 11.0 116.0 94 90 W -32 1/8/01 317 10 +50 5 124.5 10.3 113.9 91 90 W -33 1/8/01 319 10 +55 5 124.5 10.7 114.3 92 90 JT -1 12/19/00 317 11 +40 5 124.5 9.2 112.7 91 90 JT -2 12/19/00 314 11 +85 5 124.5 9.1 112.2 90 90 JT -3 12/19/00 313 12 +00 5 124.5 10.8 112.5 90 90 JT-4 12/20/00 310 14 +20 3 124.0 9.1 115.5 93 90 JT -5 12/20100 311 31 +76 3 124.0 14.9 108.4 87 90 JT-6 JT -6 12/20/00 309 31 +76 3 124.0 11.4 111.6 90 90 JT -7 12120/00 310 31 +63 3 124.0 7.5 111.9 90 90 JT -8 12/20/00 307 31 +15 3 124.0 11.3 112.5 91 90 JT -9 12/20/00 312 Easement 3 124.0 8.6 111.9 90 90 JT -10 12/20/00 310 Easement 6 118.5 12.9 109.6 92 90 JT -11 12/21/00 314 Easement 6 118.5 13.6 107.9 91 90 JT -12 12/21100 313 Easement 3 124.0 8.4 111.9 90 90 SG -1 112101 313 13 +63 6 118.5 12.2 112.8 95 95 SG -2 1/2101 315 12 +20 11 128.0 6.0 127.4 100 95 SG-3 1/2/01 312 13 +90 6 118.5 10.6 114.1 96 95 SG-4 1/2101 312 14 +00 6 118.5 9.0 114.0 96 95 SG-5 1/2/01 315 12 +36 5 124.5 7.7 120.0 96 95 SG-6 1/2/01 315 12 +36 5 124.5 6.4 118.1 95 95 SG-7 1/2/01 319 10 +96 6 118.5 7.8 115.2 97 95 SG -8 1/2101 318 11 +25 5 124.5 7.8 121.0 97 95 SG -9 1/17/01 311 15 +20 2 128.0 8.4 123.2 96 95 SG-10 1117/01 311 15 +40 2 128.0 7.8 124.8 98 95 SG -11 1117/01 312 14 +50 2 128.0 7.3 122.2 95 95 SG -12 1117101 313 13 +45 4 129.5 9.3 126.9 98 95 SG -13 1/17/01 314 12 +65 5 124.5 9.8 119.2 96 95 SG -14 1/17/01 317 11 +75 5 124.5 8.1 121.2 97 95 SG -15 1/17/01 319 11 +30 5 124.5 7.9 118.8 95 95 G e o t e c h n i c s DENSITY TEST RESULTS Project No. 0517- 003 -01 � - Incorporated North Mesa -Lower Document No. 1 -0063 53 Barratt American FIGURE C -3 95 Test Test Elevation Location/ Soil Max. Dry Moisture Dry Relative Required Retest No. Date [ft] Station I Type Density Content Density Compaction Compaction Number 318 11 +51 12 133.0 5.4 Nc1 [ %] [pcf] [ %] [ °ia 315 CG -1 1/3/01 314 12 +78 12 133.0 53 131.2 99 95 CG-2 1/3/01 320 10 +86 12 133.0 6.0 130.9 98 95 CG-3 1/3/01 318 11 +50 12 133.0 5.2 132.5 100 95 CG-4 1/3/01 318 11 +51 12 133.0 5.4 131.5 99 95 CG -5 1/3/01 315 12 +79 12 133.0 5.1 129.0 97 95 CG -6 1/3/01 314 13 +50 12 133.0 6.7 129.9 98 95 CG -7 1/3/01 313 14 +25 12 133.0 5.2 131.0 98 95 CG -8 1/3/01 312 14 +80 12 133.0 5.6 131.8 99 95 CG -9 1/3/01 314 13 +89 12 133.0 5.2 131.3 99 95 CG -10 1/3/01 314 13 +16 12 133.0 6.2 130.7 98 95 CG-11 1/3/01 310 15 +48 12 133.0 4.5 132.5 100 95 WB-1 1218/00 318 Lot 12 3 124.0 12.6 115.1 93 90 WB-2 12/8/00 319 Lot 12 3 124.0 9.2 116.4 94 90 W B-3 1218/00 321 Lot 12 3 124.0 9.3 111.2 90 90 WB-4 12/8/00 321 Lot 12 3 124.0 9.3 119.9 97 90 WB-5 12/8100 320 Lot 12 3 124.0 9.7 112.8 91 90 W B-6 12/8/00 320 Lot 12 3 124.0 10.3 116.9 94 90 WB-7 12000 322 Lot 12 3 124.0 10.2 116.4 94 90 B -1 1/18/01 311 15 +50 13 136.5 6.2 132.5 97 95 B -2 1 118/01 312 15 +20 13 136.5 5.9 135.5 99 95 B-3 1/18/01 312 14 +80 13 136.5 5.0 134.3 98 95 B-4 1/18/01 313 13 +95 13 136.5 5.1 130.9 96 95 B-5 1/18/01 314 13 +20 13 136.5 5.0 131.2 96 95 B-6 1/18/01 314 12 +90 13 136.5 4.8 129.9 95 95 B•7 1/18/01 316 12 +15 13 136.5 5.3 132.1 97 95 B-8 1118/01 319 11 +60 13 136.5 4.9 129.3 95 95 B -9 1/30/01 320 10 +50 13 136.5 6.8 131.9 97 95 B-10 1/30/01 320 10 +60 13 136.5 4.8 130.1 95 95 AC -1 1/19/01 311 15 +70 AC-1 142.6 N/A 142.3 100 95 AC -2 1119/01 312 15 +00 AC -1 142.6 N/A 143.4 100 95 AC -3 1119/01 313 14 +20 AC -1 142.6 NIA 138.8 97 95 AC-4 1119/01 314 13 +00 AC -1 142.6 NIA 139.4 98 95 AC -5 1/19/01 316 11 +90 AC -1 142.6 N/A 141.7 99 95 AC -6 1119/01 318 11 +40 AC -1 142.6 N/A 140.1 98 95 AC -7 1/19/01 311 15 +65 AC -2 142.1 NIA 138.9 98 95 AC -8 1/19/01 312 15 +30 AC -2 142.1 N/A 136.9 96 95 AC -9 1119/01 313 14 +55 AC -2 142.1 N/A 137.9 97 95 ACAC 1/19/01 313 13 +70 AC-2 142.1 NIA 137.8 97 95 AC -11 1119/01 314 13 +20 AC -2 142.1 NIA 140.3 99 95 AC -11' 1/19/01 316 12 +20 AC -2 142.1 N/A 138.0 97 95 ACA' 1/19/01 316 12 +05 AC -2 142.1 N/A 140.2 99 95 AC -14 1119/01 317 11 +70 AC -2 142.1 N/A 138.5 97 95 AC -1E 1/19/01 319 11 +10 AC -2 142.1 N/A 141.8 100 95 SW -1 319/01 320 10 +36 5 124.5 11.1 111.8 90 90 SW -2 3/9/01 320 10 +36 5 124.5 11.0 116.5 94 90 SW -3 7/23/01 321 11 +20 5 124.5 6.6 114.8 92 90 ------------ 01 4' - - - - - - - - - . .. . ...... R I I A V OiT v �R, IS-; "CO N!"R EXPLANATION SS-13 Appmxi :to I ... it,, If 111itany se— trench b-1,1111 re 320 SD-5 density t Approximate location of tm dram trench b,,kflll density test W-33 Appm,dende A- elk, JT-12 location of water beach le-kfill density test Approximate location ofjolm-111 french backfill density ­WYNO, 11, Wy� V� NO- "Al at I, ?r—'A 11 SG-15 Approximate location If street ,bg,,de density test 71q K 604�1.. 9, W, AM -,,I �40 C G-11 Approximate, location ofcu,b,,d gmthirsubgrade density test Yf '7 I'M WB-7 4! 14 ;iwk, "S M, �'g i 1� T7 B-16 Approximate location of aggregate be.e density fast ww ft, A P Approximate location of asphalt concrete density at , M gpy, SW-3 Approximate location of sidewalk density test 'um"T", I , , �� -1119 �: � 320 "I', I W �4 All 14 q 41 0 U0 Ai�Z -- 1, Awo e of e e h n i c s G—CH-Al. MAP iz ��Tncorporated I Mll� 4 N6n'X"A"' 1 5 d 'A, APPIMA01 OF' / �111111(� � , WN�, VENCANVY'AS VIN,? 1 )F IA "IQ OPM 04M, C)" cv, Nb i ENCINITAS RANCH "0 .. .... I'laI" ��JWW 1 NO R11 -1 IMESA LOWER "o 300 �0, soo -41"I'l p"Y", 6. C', 'a v KNQ,= lzfifv jo_#r"t L JIL ,_V 14 �41111111 fLOO 4 4�0 mui hft 111il We 1 w§� t, IF M 11: ivy s. "m 'w 4,!� M Rl",kXs . .. . ...... R I I A V OiT v �R, EXPLANATION SS-13 Appmxi :to I ... it,, If 111itany se— trench b-1,1111 re t, 7 SD-5 density t Approximate location of tm dram trench b,,kflll density test W-33 Appm,dende A- elk, JT-12 location of water beach le-kfill density test Approximate location ofjolm-111 french backfill density ­WYNO, 11, Wy� V� NO- "Al at I, ?r—'A 11 SG-15 Approximate location If street ,bg,,de density test 71q K 604�1.. 9, W, AM -,,I �40 C G-11 Approximate, location ofcu,b,,d gmthirsubgrade density test Yf WB-7 Approximate I ... tum of mil b—Mill trench density test T7 B-16 Approximate location of aggregate be.e density fast ww ft, AC-15 Approximate location of asphalt concrete density at , M gpy, SW-3 Approximate location of sidewalk density test Ai�Z -- 1, Awo e of e e h n i c s G—CH-Al. MAP ��Tncorporated N6n'X"A"' 1 5 d 'A, APPIMA01 OF' / �111111(� � , WN�, VENCANVY'AS VIN,? 1 )F IA "IQ OPM 04M, C)" cv, Nb i ENCINITAS RANCH .. .... I'laI" ��JWW 1 NO R11 -1 IMESA LOWER I w �4 320 � 'invsNR � Ef1 `' ✓, �e � A� ly ' user i�I f �� 4{ @@ mo t )8 !w iµ n �J �ri1 i�lF• }} Y- {+eoa^rnWm Ntiur ¢di `kn 4d�r ar a H E per GrI¢ _tvej �w r' I I µGNS Nt <£Ca1i {i'lYIeLF'S 'i It Y. r 1 200 299 to iu, e 280 V y_ u'. _ Y t`Ytc >kl ttk h(Aid �, 254.00 l f "70a a d ' d (did so, �t C 9 "sr7 MOO ��'r-1 r t3 Ci•d o 9 8 3•i�C7 12 1-00 a� °rre�sr r�n�t,� �i PnM fl.I M2lY Al eMxtN x pW�,kFlUM L j: ww 54 it 7rR'f Y<1M 1DIwiSE rhlt �'J r wvaWa : acre awr (j rmt�, F e ru.nrww v h mar ad+ YJ +SB �^ d PFiY. .• �'j,l f�} "Y }p :�i, I3 rWAk - r is Y f9bY rs ¢ w 1 Y.Y J h r' y., s N 9 15'S ! a'U Ur' z I3uu Y I J 4 1" P: V 1tt r� W 1 e.ueV}y Y NJ 8hP1 wrY r9s.ra rVx. r, narJN cc tnHUhYSlW OF p..aqYw�n�lr r G MRS.,, EM f xi Wvtr s€?W'w um a PnnnWA+r "� 1 �I d d '+ id i�' Y d' '" •.wwro. it N 1Y a "~ " +cr na .r nrt '""�6 ." i awrxR 1� B r' ;t `` ` kkr�uJe�ryY 3 � tr(s e o ! 0, W ,24 1St li j ],F r ro^cI m a A,r- r _ ill Y, a —TVA t "wra r h r da¢wi.wcoe«a ^ri>x sxnn r *aw +seen I `„ zee ' n,r r f JWAA t 3 ern q S i f v r • _,- ,.'. "aa'�m> a ¢�9 GEOTE NICAL MAP i I" rv^ C�Geotechnica r " `Inco posted -. _ r -.. I ., . ,'" �,Wres 1& h {ve Wr Nx m! ¢ ��_� h.• laYt44l�t: i. t +;.r Nl�tftFd t,r° .��v St:taYF+n r,.a ra4N'gJt •Iq e ," fi 1 ., N N () S , M 6a drat/ : NS14 .., a ";T 8" :} r,n ^ .._.�«. NYk. , ,....- w,..,M.«.wt • � Yuei4 0. RO tvj&Acxj ANA Ni�A Jy °p . [ IR . ,w (r I � �ri 4 e f Al m ppry h � y '.n ks r eraxwvwr i E$ ka�wmz�h Y E. Y ,� � vim.". ` • _.�� - ._ - r, i�4 I q �nrw.,. M - ._...rtl us G�WCPAw• �a lks =f'�;r '. .mrev.SiM sYh PnWry vBrka+M YP M,"MVd� a .tyro-'+ er I P � � t rt✓v�xr�,. n w t 14 gpt Y i ally v f Q� .�N -�t,x r F ,7P l� vb N4hyY,tlWlbtl I�bd � ,� r J r SeN✓tNY Imwfe, PVdry y6 +J(F r)fdt SA" W.M1lRNAPh6M M' ldl'NNM ��Ma ; 290 290 230 f !'t+ +.747th rAl [.a i 2+01 00 f400 .. ' 6" +00 8+4* -. 9-z 00 0 0 u3",00 L ?$ #)-- ----- _ 4 e f Al m ppry h � y '.n ks r eraxwvwr i E$ ka�wmz�h Y E. Y ,� � vim.". ` • _.�� - ._ - r, i�4 I q �nrw.,. M - ._...rtl us G�WCPAw• �a lks =f'�;r '. .mrev.SiM sYh PnWry vBrka+M YP M,"MVd� a .tyro-'+ er I P � � t rt✓v�xr�,. n w t 6EOTEOIINICAI. MAP . - ® Geofechnics incorpo rated °`°"� " "" ✓ap(�»- Far k��,��� @t��"�"� ✓� P+-L4 �4 ENCINITAS RANCH NORIU MESA--LOWER i 14 gpt Y i f Q� F ,7P l� n I�bd � d _ r r 6EOTEOIINICAI. MAP . - ® Geofechnics incorpo rated °`°"� " "" ✓ap(�»- Far k��,��� @t��"�"� ✓� P+-L4 �4 ENCINITAS RANCH NORIU MESA--LOWER i Sent By: OEOTECHNICS INC; , I 858 536 8311 ; Nov -13 -00 8:46; Page 2 Geotechnics Incorporated PrisupWk: Ana my R EeUasl Mtdhad P. ImbrigW W. Lee Nmderhu nl October 13, 2000 Barratt American Incorporated Project No. 0517- 003 -01 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 Document No, 0 -1082 Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Mr. Bruce Me7an SUBJECT: INTERIM AS- GRADED REYORT North Mesa - Lower, Lots I through 5, 1 nts 7 through 14, and Lot 16 Encinitas Ranch Genticmcn: In accordance with your request, we have prepared this letter presenting our conclusions regarding the as- graded conditions of tots l through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and Lot 16. An As- Graded report will be prepared once the grading of Lots 6 and 15 are completed. This letter includes recommendations regarding foundation design for single -family structures. The conclusions presented herein are based on the observation and testing services provided by Geotechnics Incorporated during the earthwork construction of the subject site. Our services did not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employces, or agents. A final report presenting the results of our observations and testing of the overall site grading is being prepared. In general, the grading of the lots included the removal of loose surficial soils to expose competent formational materials and the placemcnt of compacted fill to approximate plan grade. Lots 13, 14, and 16 were excavated to finish grade. In general, the fill consisted of clayey sand. The soil was placed generally in lifts approximately 8 inches thick, moisture conditioned, and compacted by scrapers and a rubber -tired compactor. The fill thicknesses beneath each pad are presented in the attached Table 1. In our opinion, the grading and compaction of the fill material underlying the subject lot was performed in general accordance with the intent of the project geotechnical recommendations, and 9245 AMrity Rd., Sts 103 • San IMW Cantbraia 92114 Pbolw (M) 536. INN • Fax (SW 536.6311 Sent By: OEOTECHNICS INC; 858 536 8311 Nov -13 -00 8:46; Page 3 r Bamn American lncorporalcd Project No. 0517 -103 -01 October 13, 2000 Doeumcnl Nv. O -1082 Pagc Nu. 2 the requirements of the City of Encinitas. The conclusions presented herein are based on the observations and testing performed through October 6, 2000. No representations are made as to the quality or extent of materials not observed. Samples of the near surface soil were collected from the subject lots for expansion index and soluble sulfate content testing. The tests were conducted in general accordance with ASTM D4829 and ASTM D516, respectively. The results of the expansion index tests are also presented in the attached Table 1. Each of the soluble sulfate tests indicated less than 0.10 percent by weight, indicating negligible sulfate exposure. However, severe sulfate contents may exist in the near surface soils. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are based on the expected existing subsurface conditions. They are generally consistent with methods typically used in southern California. Other alternatives may be available. The foundation recommendations presented herein should not be considered to preclude more restrictive criteria of governing agencies or by the struaund engineer. The design of the foundation system should be performed by the project structural engineer basal on current code requirements and accepted engineering practices. Edge Moisture Variation, e„ Center Lift: 5.3 feet Edge Lift: 2.6 feet Differential Swell, YM Center Lift: 1.7 inches Edge Lift 0.6 inches Differential Settlement: 314 -inch Allowable Bearing Capacity: 2,000 lbs/ft at slab subgrade Geotechnics Incorporated Sent By: OEOTECHNICS INC; Barrett American Incorponticd ocmbcr 13. 2000 Conventional Foundations Allowable Soil Bearing. Minimum Footing Width: Minimum, Footing Depth: 856 536 8311 ; Nov -13 -00 8:46; Page a Pmject No. 0517 -003 4)1 Docununt No. 0-1082 Page No, 3 2,500 lbs/ftt (allow a one -third increase for short-term wind or seismic loads) 12 inches 18 inches below lowest adjacent soil grade Minimum Slab'fhickness: 5'/: inches Differential Settlement: 3 /4-inch Lateral loads may be resisted by friction and by the passive resistance of the supporting soils. A coefficient of friction of 0.3 may be used between the bottom of footings and the supporting soils. The passive resistance of the fill soils may be assumed to be equal to the pressure developed by a fluid with a density of 300 lbs. /ft . A one -third increase in the passive value may be used for wind or seismic loads. The passive resistance of the soils may be combined with the frictional resistance without reduction in evaluating the total lateral resistance. The following CBC seismic parameters may be used for design of the proposed buildings: Seismic Zone Factor, Z: 0.4 Seismic Source Type: B Soil Profile Type: Sr Seismic Coefficients, C,,: 0.40N, C,: 0.56N, Near- Source Factors, N,: 1.0 N,: 1.2 Footings adjacent to slopes should be founded at a depth such that the distance between the lower outside edge of the footing and the face of any slope is at least 8 feet. Geotechnics incorporated Sent By: OEOTECHNICS INC; 858 538 8311 ; Nov -13 -00 8:47; Page 5 i Burrut American Incorporated P oject N e t 1 .003 -01 October 13, 2000 IAxwttentNo. No. Pap Nu. 4 Concrete slabs constructed on soil ultimately cause the moisture content to rise in the underlying soil. Typical moisture protection used in snuthern California for interior, on -grade slabs consists of 2 inches of clean sand covered by a 20 -mil moisture barrier covered by another 2- inches of cleau sand. The sand should have a minimum sand equivalent of at least 50 when tested in accordance with ASTM test method D2419. It has been our experience that such systems will transmit from approximately 6 to 12 pounds of moisture per 1000 square feet per day. It is our opinion that soil conditions do not exist that would preclude the use of the indicated moisture protection on this project. It should be recognized, however, that this system relies entirely on the integrity of the visqueen membrane. Accordingly, care should be taken to protect the visqueen against all punctures and to provide adequate overlap at all seams. If the above discussed moisture transmission is considered to be excessive for the types of floor coverings planned, further protection can be realized by adding a capillary break layer in accordance with the following alternative: 2 inches of clean sand (sand equivalent of 30 or more), over 10 tail. plastic sheeting, over 4 inches of minus 3/8 -inch crushed rock over subgrade. Another alternative would be to place a moisture barrier with a thickness greater than 20 mil directly on the subgrade, covered with at least 2 inches of clean sand. The moisture barrier should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's requirements, and any joints or laps should be throughly sealed in accordance with the manufacturer's requirements to provide athorough seal. The concrete should have a low water - cement ratio of no greater than 0.5, and be moist -cured for at least 5 days in accordance with the methods recommended by the American Concrete Institute. Additionally, the project architect and/or a waterproofing consultant should evaluate the moisture barrier requirements based on the anticipated floor coverings and proposed use. We also recommend that a special registered inspector test and inspect the concrete placement and slab construction to confirm the recommendations herein arc implemented in the field. Tltc type of cement used should be based on the results of sulfate content testing of finish grade soils as reported herein, and the design criteria of the 1998 California Building Code. it should be noted Geotechnics Incorporated Sent By: OEOTECHNICS INC; 858 538 8311 Nov -13 -00 8:47; Page 6/10 kiarratt American Incorporated Project No. 0517.OU3.01 0etober 13, 2000 Document Nu. 0.1082 Peke Nu. 5 that soluble sulfate in the irrigation water supply, and/or the use of fertilizer may cause the sulfate content in the surficial soils to increase with time. This may result in a higher sulfate exposure than that indicated by the test results reported herein. Studies have shown that the use of improved cements in the concrete, and a low water - cement ratio will improve the resistance of the concrete to sulfate expostue. RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls should be backfilled with material exhibiting a low expansion potential, less than 20 as evaluated by UBC Standard 29 -2 (expansion Index test). Materials exhibiting a greater expansion potential would increase the lateral pressures beyond design values. The following design parameters for earth retaining structures are provided assuming backfill with a low potential for expansion. Equivalent Fluid Pressure with level backfill: 30 lbs/W Equivalent Fluid Pressure with 2:1 sloping backfill: 43 Ibs/f' Allowable Soil Bearing: 2,500 lbs/li' Passive Pressure: 300 lbsl Coefficient of Friction, soil to concrete: 0.3 The equivalent fluid pressures are based on the active soil state, assuming the walls are free to rotate at least 1 percent of the wall height. The pressures do not include surcharge loads, hydrostatic pressure, or seepage forces. Walls should be fully drained to prevent hydrostatic or seepage pressures. Wall drain details are given in the attached Figure 1, Retaining Wall Drain Details. When combining passive pressure and friction for passive resistance, the passive pressure should be reduced by one - third. It has been our experience that site retaining walls frequently develop high moisture or free water in the backfili due to heavy irrigation that commonly occurs in subdivisions. This leads to problems such as efflorescence on the face of the wall and spalling of stucco finishes. Geotechnics Incorporated Sent By: OEOTECHNICS INC; 858 538 8311 ; Nov -13.00 8:47; Page 7'10 Barret[ Amcncmn fncorporaWd Project No. t No. 003-01 October 13, 2000 Document Page No Page No 6 To decrease such problems, it is suggested that walls be moisture - proofed on the positive side in addition to having a back - drain. Backfilling retaining walls with expansive soils can inurcase lateral pressures well beyond the active or at -rest pressures indicated above. We recommend that retaining walls be backfilled with free draining, granular soil having an Expansive Index of 20 or less. The backfill area should include the zone defined by a 1:1 sloping plane, back from the base of the wall. Retaining wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction, based on Modified Proctor density. Backfill should not be placed until walls have achieved adequate structural strength. Heavy compaction equipment which could cause distress to walls should not be used. The recommendations presented herein were provided using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional opinions included in this letter. If you have any questions regarding the information presented, we would be happy to meet with you. We appreciate this opportunity to provide professional services. GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Dick Roberts Project Geologist Distribution: (4) Addressee Attachments: Table 1 - Lot Subsurface Conditions Figure 1 - Wall Drain Details Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. C 40333 Principal Geotechnics Incorporated Prof 3 UP. Barrett American Incorporated TABLE 1 Project No. 0517- 003 -01 North Mesa -Lower LOT SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Document No. 0 -1082 October 13, 2000 LOT GREATER FILL LESSER FILL DIFFERENTIAL EXPANSION EXPANSION NUMBER THICICVM TIBC104M FILL TFUCXMM INDEX POTENTIAL 1 15 7 g 0 Very Low 2 13 3 10 0 V Low 3 17 8 8 0 Very Low 4 18 8 8 0 Vpry Low 5 a 3 5 0 Very Low e 7 WcornpWle 3 2 1 0 Very Law 8 30 8 Y2 0 very Lan 9 50 10 40 0 Very Law 10 50 in 40 0 Very Low 11 12 8 8 0 Vag Low 12 8 2 6 0 Very Low 13 1 0 1 0 V 14 1 0 1 0 V nLow 15 18 kmm 1 0 1 0 Ve Sent By: OEOTECHNICS INC; 858 536 6311 ; NCV -13 -00 B:48; Page 9!10 ROCK AND FABRIC ALTERNATIVE DAMP- PROOFING OR WATER- PROOFING AS REQUIRED E`OMPAOTED -' . BAGKPILL' ce Am= MINUS 314 -INCH CRUSHED ROCK 'wrri ENVELOPED IN FILTER FABRIC a = =' (MIRAFI 14ONL, SUPAC 4NP, OR APPROVED SIMILAR) , 4-INCH DIAM. PVC , PERFORATED PIPE DAMP-PROOFING OR WATER- PROOFING AS REQUIRED -, GEOCOMPOSITE ,�j -, •. .- PANEL DRAIN ' - ' I. PANEL DRAIN -� _. •�"` --► ALTERNATIVE ,3ez '.GOMPACTED. ;'- I's BACKFILL• . y s 1 CU. FT. PER LINEAR FOOT OF . , . - WEEP -HOLE - MINUS 314 -INCH CRUSHED ALTERNATIVE ROCK ENVELOPED IN FILTER FABRIC \� 4 -INCH DIAM. PVC - PERFORATED PIPE _ 12 -INCH MINIMUM WEEP -HOLE ALTERNATIVI NOTES 1) Perforated pipe should outlet through a solid pipe to a free gravity outfall. Perforated pipe and outlet pipe should have a tall of at least 1 %. 2) As an aKemalive to the perforated pipe and outlet, weepfioles may be constructed. Weep -Moles should be at least 2 inches in diameter, spaced no greater than 8 feet, and be located just above grade at the bottom of wall. 3) Filter fabric should consist of Mirafi 140N, Supac 5NP, Amoco 4599, or similar approved fabric. Filter fabric should be overlapped at bast 8 -inches. 4) Geocomposite panel drain should consist of Minedrain 6000, J -DRain 400, Supac DS-15, or approved similar product 5) Drain installation should be observed by the geotechnical consultant prior to becldllllrlg. Project No. 0517 -003-01 G e o t e c h n i c s Document No. o -1 oat I n e o r p o rated WALL DRAIN DETAILS FIGURE 1 1r3e1fttM :Ofe "%, AVw1wM nee. e Sent By: OEOTECHNICS INC; 858 536 8311 ; Nov-13-00 8:48; Page 10;10 G e o t e c h n i c s Incorporated Antbmy F. aetrau MkA" P. tsbrW10 W. 1x leuduhnrrt October 16, 2000 Barratt Americar. Lncorporated Project No. 0517- 003 -01 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 Document No. 0 -1087 Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Mr. Bruce Mezan SUBJECT; FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW North Mesa - Lower, Lots 1 through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and Lot 16 F.,ncinitac Ranch References: (1) Specialty Steel, 1998, Barran American Quail Ridge, Encinitas, CA: Ref. No. 1623, 16 sheets. (2) Geotecbnics Incorporated, 2000, Interim AS- Graded Report, North Mesa- Lower, Lots 1 through 5, Lots 7 through 14, and Lot 16, Encinitas Ranch: Project No. 0517- 003-01, Document No. 0 -1082, dated October 13- Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the geotechnical aspects of the foundation plans (Reference 1) for conformance with the referenced geotechnical recommendations (Reference 2). In our opinion, the plans conform with our recommendations. If you have any questions regarding the information presented, we would be happy to meet with you. We appreciate this opporttmity to provide professional services. GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED ox�� Project Geologist ri �,7/ 0 Distribution: (4) Addressee Anthony F. Belfast, P.E. C 40333 Principal 97,45 Aeti►Ny Rd.,.SM 103 • fan Diego, Caaforvia Pbow (050) 3361000 • Fax (8m) SM4311 i p04t1� w a �.Tror 14,9,eI"K MZ34 139zltrt7-r Gpp A::Z dex So c/ rN Noce ,4,z�e f�A GY- C.Il135: rlozer3 ALL- •iAt -�' .<i ©l�Trf /'2e5ri Lo tJb7t.- 139�'.Pri7T Loo KuCG nlo,CYU TYJ Ctsc-JE• SKc. LAuRSN CZ'- /lderer I -le:FA Comex - 31s arr Ld/D.CKj�c& SOUrs/ fc37r/ C�CLG -t •SRG L mazs,Ai cr- aAC�5 -IN ccT /l:Dd Dr-'31-or 4MAJALccs ti%R,rrf rJC5h LOCUBY_ - /3�{iZa =R TT 40O&,IG we-5r- O/{GY E"nl Y2Y ,r/t /S SoarsF �L C4.l2E14 .771 rL IiRcccs g r 7�A a- rL IiRcccs VL 11W . Ir ENCINITAS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATION MAP VICINITY MAP DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT ENCINITAS RANCH NORTH MESA. -QUAIL HOLLOW City Of Encinitas, California k, � f QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE A io, ,NE ' c T ✓ TYPICAL PRIVATE STREET P)T ST A" ` srn r rn r �Li MODIFIED 4" ROLLED CURB SECTION . "A" MAiN TENANCE ACCESS ROAD KEY MAP 11i I 11L' ARCHITECTURAUBUILDING SUMMARY a s z, co -CFO iac _ 1, ' co n a t T a i oT ,5' r2 4 i � oza _. ARCHITECTURAUELEVATION SUMMARY or N ` N F 6 S;3 i _2 , r _..._ C D Air EASEMENT NOTES LEGEND A A oG� r. „U s.o_,� J111 LE" 0 1EL 1 NOTES o,1,, o� 9 e,1 GENERAL DESIGN NOTES a 1A­ 11 tlt'l /' 4c CASE N0.98 -171 TM /EIA/CDP /DRP { \ IT ��.�1 }IJ III -, e A 1 n 6 OG / L '' \ , _ :a J� III h7r -,rs%� vas " ��..k _, ° m - r -� Iv vu_i 3se ���� �a � I 7a C r . I 114,101. AA— IF m eo i _ f � /P "k, l i r dP e Ii —Sl r ✓ at „ ,� �: Fo<< " r _a° o.� .�:�� i I � � ab 7 r i l i O .� ° r ° e evo °° ee oaeee° �r Fnr, qwp oeee 000e > ° °e S - NOTf R oy �I SQR OP.��i,N t FN) I II .D. LA AT Iv ACC A ?Fx.G4P7 54— G 33 0 n n A / r CD l 1. n ,E, y al a 11 is., o. ,n Ill .,ILL s„ Js �5 n Baal?- O a F =oa caavgYe scam I PaePnaeoev: DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SHEET i4 ENCINITAS RANCH :o se HLNSAKER " - A SO(IATES I NORTH MESA-QUAIL HOLLOW °F rir" nr II nalie —i. 2 ENCINITAS RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATION MAP � I 1 VICINITY MAP 107 11 ­ir rz' .e Ls.T _ - .zu,e�. IS LOT- / o QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE \ f yly �f ,.,,77 TYPICAL PRIVATE STREET PVT Si. A" - 1111E o' X SECT16N 'A" MODIFIED 4" ROLLED CURB MAM E4ANCE ACCYSS ROAD TENTA ENCINITj NORTH MESA City Of End VEMAP GENERAL NOTES 3 RANCH QUAIL HOLLOW tas, California GENERAL DESIGN NOTES LEGEND D � �s.i 11 I i 0 OO O _ = v IS 13 J Ov .rc ,vn��.nrro. F. I vn1MU O irk LEGAL DESCRIPTION is I� ..r 19 ) PUBLIC UTILITIES AND DISTRICTS 0 18 # =: O �a�� 3 _I CT PRIVATE STREET STANDARDS All WAIVERS 111s)l 11 "Ill INDEMNIFICATION CERTIFICATE _So EASEMENT NOTES 11 s, h o . 1 L„ a I..' (" r �. 66" a s) o c� �r OO ( SIT d J acw " O ,�'gE OWNER SUBDIVIDER 1.. r. ` F6 2 U Is I L 11 CASE NO. 98-171 TM /EIA /CDP /DRP _.. PREPARED BY: IM HUNSAKER NO. REVISIONS DATE 8V ate, � � ` � i= --��' \\ •=tt� "' � i� a AID v' \ A 3J ra r 571 C, _ f3355 of imp ' "'.�,�" ��_ _ 1 C�- _ — _ i t V � /1 .✓ fit'- i i �i � i i. I _T F/MJ, 5b -^ da x CD 1'__1__"'' 1f° \ \\.a °o °Doti °e °° oa a.° ° ° °° ° ° °° ° —( /y /T g . rcyt4fs:a sa � tleo i -` rd' i$ 1. I \ _J W 4 D N" . NOTE LA[D A111 P5 4 j a \ Ik j I n i ;s M %f %/ APN b All i a �✓ 2 , III s� r_ ° �a ,y t stir ago p. ... ��3'i =� un a � � RaawC scatF BY PREPARED TENTATIVE MAP SHEET "��;ATFS ENCINITAS RANCH 2 NORTH MESA -QUAIL HOLLOW of .... "` City Of Encinitas, California 2 PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING IRVINE RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO DAVE HAMMAR JACK HILL LEX WILLIMAN ALISA VIALPANOO 10179 Huennekens Sr. San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558 -4500 PH (858) 558 -1414 F X w .hunsakeccom Info ®HunsakerSD.com HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES S A N D I E G O. I N C . HYDROLOGY & HYDRAULIC STUDY for NORTH MESA - LOWER in the City of San Diego Prepared for: Barratt American Homes 2035 Corte Del Nogal Suite 160 Carlsbad, CA 92009 w.o.0294 -132 June 9, 1999 Revised October 1, 1999 Revised May 12, 2000 Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. R mond L. Martin, R.C.E. Project Manager Mqy 3 0 �UUv 'f\ O�pYLOFESS /ON� BOND L ,{.79 �FZ rn �� 4 O Z m NO. 48670 A Exp. 6/30 /00 S�. C I w I- _��F' ��OF CAL -1F� RO.W R:W3BNt64VAM North Mesa - Lower Drainage Study TABLE OF CONTENTS References Introduction Existing Conditions Proposed Development Conclusions Criteria and Methodology 100 -year Hydrology Study 100 -Year Hydrology Study (Natural Condition) Hydraulic Calculations D -75 Capacity Calculations D -75 Capacity Chart Curb Inlet Sizing Energy Dissipators Reference Data Hydrology Map (Developed) Hydrology Map (Natural Conditions) SECTION I V VI VII (pocket) (pocket) AD "b h' 11MMMa �U. 030413$ 1&IM North Mesa - Lower Drainage Study References County of San Diego Hydrology Manual Handbook of Hydraulics, Brater & King Introduction This hydrology report was prepared in conjunction with submittal of an application for private improvements and grading plan approval on a 20.4 -acre site in the City of Encinitas known as North Mesa - Lower. This report includes: • Hydrologic calculations to determine the 100 -year peak discharge from the developed site. Pipe sizing for the proposed storm drainage system. Existing Conditions The subject property is a partially mass graded portion of Encinitas Ranch. It is bounded on the east by the currently proposed extension of Quail Gardens Drive, the northwest by an additional portion of the mass graded Encinitas Ranch and to the southwest by a natural canyon. The northerly 2/3 generally slopes northwesterly and away from the proposed improvements. The southerly 1/3 of the property drains generally southwesterly into the existing natural canyon. Proposed Development The project proposes construction of 16 standard size along a single private street, 1 much larger custom home building lot with 2 buildable pads and 1 open space easement lot. Proposed Lots 1 through 16 are located along the proposed private street at the east side of the property. These lots will drain via swales to be designed during the precise grading phase of this project to discharge onto Private Street "A ", into the proposed drainage structure (per this report). Lot 17's building pads will drain onto the natural slopes surrounding them. Conclusions Final Design of the project will include a storm drainage system adequate capacity to safely convey the 100 -year design storm. aoax wv�+�uaaze,ac North Mesa - Lower Drainage Study Drainage Criteria and Methodology Design Storm 100 -year storm Land Use Single- family Residential Soil Type A hydrologic soil group "D" was used for this study. Runoff Coefficient "C" values were based on the County of San Diego Hydrology Manual. The site is single - family residential, therefore a "C" value of 0.55 was used. Rainfall Intensity The rainfall intensity values were based on the criteria presented in the County of San Diego Hydrology Manual. ao.a k.�02wo�251- .0 oxv� -nz w��se North Mesa - Lower Drainage Study HYDROLOGY METHOD OF ANALYSIS The computer generated analysis for this watershed is consistent with current engineering standards and requirements of the County of San Diego. This report also contains calculations for the proposed storm drain within the project limits. RATIONAL METHOD The most widely used hydrologic model for estimating watershed peak runoff rates is the rational method. The rational method is applied to small urban and semi -urban areas of less than 0.5 square miles. The rational method equation relates storm rainfall intensity, a selected runoff coefficient, and drainage area to peak runoff rate. This relationship is expressed by the equation: Q = CIA. Where: Q = The peak runoff rate in cubic feet per second at the point of analysis. C = A runoff coefficient representing the area - averaged ratio of runoff to rainfall intensity. I = The time - averaged rainfall intensity in inches per hour corresponding to the times of concentration. A = The drainage basin area in acres. LINK -NODE STUDY In performing a link -node study, the surface area of the basin is divided into basic areas which discharge into different designated drainage basins. These "sub - basins" depend upon locations of inlets and ridge lines. SUBAREA SUMMATION MODEL The rational method modeling approach is widely used due to its simplicity of application, and its capability for estimating peak runoff rates throughout the interior of a study watershed analogous to the subarea model. The procedure for the Subarea Summation Model is as follows: RO kp x 0291, I MW19 d.[ ..0 029..13: W,09 North Mesa - Lower Drainage Study (1) Subdivide the watershed into subareas with the initial subarea being less than 10 acres in size (generally 1 lot will do), and the subsequent subareas gradually increasing in size. Assign upstream and downstream nodal point numbers to each subarea in order to correlate calculations to the watershed map. (2) Estimate a Tc; by using a nomograph or overlaid flow velocity estimation. (3) Using T, determine the corresponding values of I. Then Q = C I A. (4) Using Q, estimate the travel time between this node and the next by Manning's equation as applied to the particular channel or conduit linking the two nodes. The nodes are joined together by links, which may be street gutter flows, drainage swales or drainage ditches. These links are characterized by length, area, runoff coefficient and cross - section. The Computer subarea menu is as follows: Enter Upstream node number .. ............................... Enter Downstream node number ............................... SUBAREA HYDROLOGIC PROCESS Code 1. Confluence analysis at node. Code 2. Initial subarea analysis. Code 3. Pipeflow travel time (computer estimated). Code 4. Pipeflow travel time (user specified). Code 5. Trapezoidal channel travel time. Code 6. Street flow analysis through subarea. Code 7. User - specified information at node. Code 8. Addition of sub area runoff to main line. Code 9. V -gutter flow through area. Select subarea hydrologic process .................... The engineer enters in the pertinent nodes, and then the hydrologic process. Where two or more links join together, the node is analyzed by the confluence method described as follows: nosy �1w 8 m North Mesa - Lower Drainage Study At the confluence point of two or more basins, the following procedure is used to adjust the total summation of peak flow rates to allow for differences in basin times of concentration. This adjustment is based on the assumption that each basin's hydrographs are triangular in shape. (1). If the collection streams have the same times of concentration, then the Q values are directly summed, Qp = Qa + Qb; Tp = Ta = Tb (2). If the collection streams have different times of concentration, the smaller of the tributary Q values may be adjusted as follows: (i). The most frequent case is where the collection stream with the longer time of concentration has the larger Q. The smaller Q value is adjusted by the ratio of rainfall intensities. Qp = Qa + Qb (la /lb); Tp = Ta (ii). In some cases, the collection stream with the shorter time of concentration has the larger Q. Then the smaller Q is adjusted by a ratio of the T values. Qp = Qb + Qa (Tt, Ta); Tp = Tb In a similar way, the underground storm drains are analyzed. The data obtained from the surface model for the flow rates present at the inlets and collection points are input into the nodes representing those structures. The design grades and lengths are used to compute the capacity of the storm drains and to model the travel time into the adjustment of the times of concentration for downstream inlets. REFERENCE 1. Hydrology Manual, County of San Diego, January 1985. 2. Hromadka, Theodore: COMPUTER METHODS IN URBAN HYDROLOGY: Lighthouse Publications, 1983. RO w k' \02W V 98Pd29110C +o. 029 13: \dvOG North Mesa - Lower Drainage Study HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE METHOD OF ANALYSIS PURPOSE The storm Drain Analysis program calculates the hydraulic grade line elevations of proposed or existing storm drain system given the physical characteristics and the discharge (Q). Current capacity allows for either pressure flow or partial flow with cross sections being either circular or rectangular box. A rectangular open channel can be analyzed as a box cross section, providing the results show that it is flowing partially full throughout the entire system, so that the soffit does not affect the computations. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The program starts the computation for the hydraulic grade line by evaluating the friction losses and the minor losses throughout the system. The junction losses are evaluated by equating pressure plus momentum for the incoming and outgoing flows through the junction. This is accomplished by applying the formula developed by the City of Los Angeles, which establishes that the summation of pressures, ignoring friction, is equal to the average cross section flow area, multiplied by the change in the hydraulic gradient through the junction (see References). The basic flow elevations used for the main lines at either end of the junction that apply to the pressure plus momentum equation depend on the type of flow at each end of the junction. These elevations are determined by computing the drawdown curves for each line. The control elevation for the lateral or lateral system is taken as the average of the hydraulic grade line elevations at both ends of the junction. If the water elevation in the lateral is above this control, the momentum contributed by the lateral in the analysis of the junction is decreased in proportion to the ratio of the area in the lateral below the control to the total area of flow. The point with greater force will be the control point and the point at the other end of the junction is determined by satisfying the pressure plus momentum equation. Any of these points may be overridden by the backwater curve originating at the main control at the downstream end of the system. If this is the case, then the pressure plus momentum equation is applied to the point or points determined by the backwater curve during the upstream analysis. The above- mentioned considerations apply to both partial and pressure flow. eo �a , m:�.vvvwam aoc ra Q.Y 132 iWIN North Mesa - Lower Drainage Study When the flow changes from partial to full or from full to partial, the program determines and prints the location where this change occurs. If the flow reaches normal depth within a conveyance, the program determines and prints this location. When the flow changes from supercritical to subcritical because of downstream conditions, a hydraulic jump occurs; the program determines the precise location of the jump by equating the pressure plus momentum for the two types of flow. The program prints the jump location, pressure plus momentum at the jump and the depth of water before and after the jump. Highway Design Manual, Los Angeles County Road Department, 1967 revised Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Manual, Los Angeles County Flood Control District, 1964 Bond Issue Handbook of Hydraulics, King and Brater, 6th edition Open - Channel Hydraulics, Ven Te Chow Office Standard No. 115, City of Los Angeles Pressure Changes at Storm Drain Junctions, University of Missouri, Engineering Series Bulletin No. 41, October 1958. RO W x,�onxevavaze aoc w o. 030F�A M9/9i II ............................................. ............................... RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE Reference: SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1985,1981 HYDROLOGY MANUAL (c) Copyright 1982 -93 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Vet. 1-SA Release Date: 9 110/93 License ID 1239 Analysis prepared by: HUNSAKER L ASSOCIATES Irvine, Inc. Planning • Engineering • Surveying Three Hughes • Irvine California 92918 • (914) 538 -1010 •..•. «...u..e.........•• DESCRIPTION OF STUDY .0 u.u... u...u... u... ' NORTH MESA LOWER, CITY OF ENCINITAS, SAN DIEGO, CA . 100 YEAR STORM HYDROLOGY STUDY ' • WO# 294 -132 5/12/00 .... . ... .. .... .... u ....................... ............................... FIL£ NAME: H: \AES92 \0294 \132 \132.OAT TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 10:32 5/12/2000 ---------------------------------`--------------------------------.-------- USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1985 SAN DIEGO MANUAL CRITERIA USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) . 100.00 6 -HOUR DURATION PRECIPITATION (INCHES) . 2.900 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) . 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE . .90 SAN DIEGO HYDROLOGY MANUAL 'C'- VALUES USED NOTE: CONSIDER ALL CONFLUENCE STREAM COMBINATIONS FOR ALL DOWNSTREAM ANALYSES ................................. ............................... PLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE . 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------- »>a RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS«.« ................................. ............................... SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS 'D' SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT .5500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH . 190.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION . 320.50 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION . 318.60 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE . 1.90 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) - 13.646 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) . 3.723 SUBAREA RUNOPF(CFS) - .43 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) . .21 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) - .43 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FLOW PROCESS . . . . . . . . . . . FROM NODE . . . . . . . . . . . 200.00 TO . . . . . NODE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201.00 IS CODE ................ 6 -----------------------------------`----_--------------.---------------...- --COMPUTE ............................................. STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA(« « ............................... UPSTREAM ELEVATION 318.60 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION 310.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) 550.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) 6. STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) . 20.00 - DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAE • 18.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) - .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) .090 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF • 1 - TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) 2.97 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) .35 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FE£T) . 9.59 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) . 2.70 PRODUCT OF DEPTH &VELOCITY - .95 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MINI • 3.40 TC(MIN) • 17.05 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) - 3.225 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS 'D' SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - .5500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) - 2.82 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - 5.00 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) - 3.03 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) - 5.43 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH (FEET) - .41 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) . 12.41 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) - 3.16 DEPTH - VELOCITY - 1.29 ................. u. u .............. u......u................. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 201.00 IS CODE - 8 »»>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW- -4<- 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR( . 3.225 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS 'D" SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - .5500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) 2.33 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CPS) 4.13 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 5.36 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) 9.57 TC(MIN) - 17.05 ... .................a......... uu......................0 u.. u............ PLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 201.00 TO NODE 202.00 IS CODE - 3 .-----------------------------------------------------------"____..--------- »»>COMPUTE PIPEFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA---- - »» USING COMPUTER- ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON- PRESSURE FLOW) - <. -< ............................................ ............................... ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) INCREASED TO 18.000 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 18.0 INCH PIPE IS 7.0 INCHES PIPEFLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) • 15_0 UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION - 306.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION . 290.00 FLOWLENGTH(FEET) - 179.50 MANNING'S N • .013 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) - 18.00 NUMBER OF PIPES 1 PIPEFLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) - 9.57 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) - .20 TC(MIN.) . 17.25 ... ........................................ ................................. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 202.00 TO NODE 203.00 IS CODE - 9 --------------------------------------------------------- »» >COMPUTE 'V' GUTTER FLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA..... UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION - 288.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION 282.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) • 90.00 'V' GUTTER WIDTH (FEET) - 3.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) • .800 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) - .400 MANNING'S N • .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) • .20000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) - 1.50 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) - 3.187 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS 'D' SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - .5500 TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) - 12.77 AVERAGE FLOWDEPTH(FEET) - .80 FLOODWIDTH(FEET) - 3.00 "V' GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN) - .12 TC(MIN) • 17.36 SUBAREA AR£A(ACRES) - .20 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - .35 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) - 5.56 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) - 9.92 NOTE:TRAVELTIME ESTIMATES BASED ON NORMAL DEPTH IN A FLOWING -FULL GUTTER(NORMAL DEPTH - GUTTER HIKE) END OF SUBAREA 'V' GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) - .80 FLOODWIDTH(FEET) 3.00 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) • 12.77 DEPTH - VELOCITY - 10.22 ............................r ur....♦ u......... «..u.................. u. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 203.00 TO NODE 203.00 IS CODE - 1 »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE.a« TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS • 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 17.36 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) - 3.19 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 5.56 PEAR FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 9.92 , ....... ................................ r............ r..u.u.rrrr.ruuur. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 206.00 TO NODE 203.00 IS CODE - 21 .»»RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS «. ............................................. ............................... SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS 'D' SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT .5500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH • 250.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION - 300.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION - 282.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE - 18.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) 8.107 •CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) - 5.209 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - .37 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - .13 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) .37 ............. r... ............rrr...•.•...r......• r. r. r ...............u.u... FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 203.00 TO NODE 203.00 IS CODE • 1 .»»DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE[, [ COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES­ ­ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 8.11 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) - 5.21 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - .13 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - .37 -- CONFLUENCE DATA -- STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CPS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 9.92 17.36 3.187 5.56 2 .37 8.11 5.209 .13 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. -- PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE -- STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CPS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 6.44 8.11 5.209 2 10.14 17.36 3.187 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 10.14 Tc(MIN.) 17.36 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 5.69 ..................................•.. .............u................. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 203.00 TO NODE 204.00 IS u.uu CODE - 9 _____________________________________________ _______________________________ ,> »,COMPUTE •V- GUTTER FLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA< , ............................................. ................... UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION • 282.00 ............ DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION - 260.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) - 110.00 -V- GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) - 3.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) - .800 PAVEMENT LIP(PEET) - .400 MANN ING'S N - .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) - .20000 MAKIMUM DEPTH(FEET) - 1.50 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) 3.177 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS 'D' SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - .5500 TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) - 22.13 AVERAGE FLOWDEPTH(FEET) - .80 FLOODWIDTH(FEET) . 3.00 -V- GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN) .08 TC(MIN) - 17.45 SUBAREA AREA[ACRESI - .12 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) - .21 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) - 5.81 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) - 10.35 NOTE:TRAVELTIME ESTIMATES BASED ON NORMAL DEPTH IN A FLOWING -FULL GUITER(NORMAL DEPTH • GUTTER HIKE) END OF SUBAREA "V- GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) - .80 FLOODWIDTH(FEET) - 3.00 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) - 22.13 DEPTH - VELOCITY • 17.10 ............................................. ............................... FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 204.00 TO NODE 204.00 IS CODE - 1 >r»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE« «< ............................................ ............................... TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 17.45 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) - 3.18 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - 5.81 PEAR PLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE • 10.35 ................ ................................ a.................u. u.u. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 209.00 TO NODE 204.00 IS CODE . 21 ». »RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS «<c< ............................................. ............................... SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS 'D' SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT .5500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH - 130.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION - 290.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION - 260.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE - 30.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) 3.965 •CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 5- MINUTES 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) - 7.114 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) 1.02 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - .26 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) - 1.02 ........................................... ................................. FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 204.00 TO NODE 204.00 IS 0006 - 1 »»>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< ,» AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES. «< ... .......................................... ............................... TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS - 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) - 5.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) . 7.11 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) - .26 PEAR FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE - 1.02 •• CONFLUENCE DATA •• STREAM RUNOFF TC INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CPS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 6.78 8.19 5.175 5.81 1 10.35 17.45 3.177 5.81 2 1.02 5.00 7.114 .26 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. '• PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE .. STREAM RUNOFF To INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 5.95 5.00 7.114 2 7.52 8.19 5.175 3 10.81 17.45 3.177 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAR FLOW RATE(CFS) - 10.81 Tc(MIN.) 17.45 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 6.07 • .......................................• ............................... FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 204.00 TO NODE 210.00 IS CODE u. - 9 ,,..COMPUTE •V- GUTTER FLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA<u« . ............................................ ............................... UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION - 260.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION 250.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) - 50.00 'V' GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) - 3.00 GUTTER HIRE(FEET) - .800 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) • .400 MANN ING'S N - .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) - .20000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) - 1.50 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) - 3.173 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS 'D' SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT • .5500 TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY (FEET/ SEC) - 22.13 AVERAGE FLOWDEPTH(FEET) • .80 FLOODWIDTH(FEET) - 3.00 'V' GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN) - .04 TC(MIN) • 17.48 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) - .03 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) • .05 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) - 6.10 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) - 10.86 NOTE:TRAVELTIME ESTIMATES BASED ON NORMAL DEPTH IN A FLOWING-FULL GUTTER(NORMAL DEPTH . GUTTER HIRE) END OF SUBAREA 'V' GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) - .80 FLOODWIDTH(FEET) 3.00 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) - 22.13 DEPTH - VELOCITY • 17.70 ............................. ............................... END OF STUDY SUMMARY: PEAR FLOW RATE(CFS) - 10.86 Tc(MIN.) . 17.48 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 6.10 •^ PEAR FLOW RATE TABLE ••• Q(CFS) TC(MIN.) 1 6.07 5.04 2 7.61 8.23 3 10.86 17.48 . ............................. ............................... END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS ............................................ ............................... RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE Reference: SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1985,1981 HYDROLOGY MANUAL (e) Copyright 1982 -93 Advanced Engineering Software (ass) Ver. 1.SA Release Date: 7/10/93 License ID 1239 Analysis prepared by: HUNSAKER S ASSOCIATES Irvine, Inc. Planning Engineering • Surveying Three Hughes • Irvine California 92718 ' (714) 538 -1010 ••••••••••••••••••••••••• DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ••• ........... *.......... NORTH MESA LOWER ' 100 YR HYDROLOGY STUDY- NATURAL COND. ' ' WO#294 -132 ' ............. • ........ u..u....u.u.......... . u♦u.u.. ................ FILE NAME: H: \AES92 \0294 \132 \ONAT.DAT TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 10:33 5/12 /2000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ----------------------- '--------------------------------------------------- 1985 SAN DIEGO MANUAL CRITERIA USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) - 100.00 6 -HOUR DURATION PRECIPITATION (INCHES) - 2.700 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) - 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE - .90 SAN DIEGO HYDROLOGY MANUAL 'C'- VALUES USED NOTE: CONSIDER ALL CONFLUENCE STREAM COMBINATIONS FOR ALL DOWNSTREAM ANALYSES • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............. FLAW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 13.00 IS CODE - 21 ,»> RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSISe< - ............................................................................ SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS 'D' RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - .4500 NATURAL WATERSHED NOMOGRAPH TIME OF CONCENTRATION WITH 10- MINUTES ADDED - 16.40(MINUTES) INITIAL SIIEAREA FLOW- LENGTH - 1900.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION - 396.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION . 210.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE - 186.00 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY IINCH /HOUR) . 3.307 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CPS) - 28.42 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 19.10 TOTAL RUNOFF(CPS) - 28.42 ............................................. ............................... END OF STUDY SUMMARY: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) - 28.42 Tc(MIN.) - 16.40 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) - 19.10 III A COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STORM DRAIN ANALYSIS REPT: PC /RD4412.1 (INPUT) DATE: 06/06/99 PAGE 1 PROJECT: NORTH MESA -LOWER ESIGNER: R.DAMARO CD L2 MAX Q ADJ Q LENGTH FL 1 FL 2 CIL /TW D W S KJ KE KM LC LI L3 L4 Al A3 A4 J N B 1 288.40 2 2 9.7 9.7 50.51 286.90 304.42 0.00 18. 0. 3 0.05 0 -00 0.00 1 0 0 0 0. 0. 0. 0.00 0.013 2 3 9.6 9.6 125.00 304.75 306.00 0.00 18. 0. 1 0.00 0.20 0.00 0 0 0 0 0. 0. 0. 0.00 0.013 ..A COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STORM DRAIN ANALYSIS REPT: PC /R❑4412.2 DATE: 06/08/99 PAGE 1 PROJECT: NORTH MESA -LOWER IESIGNER: R.DAMARO LINE Q D W ON DC FLOW SF -FULL V 1 V 2 FL I FL 2 HG 1 HG 2 ❑ 1 0 2 74 TW NO (CPS) (IN)(IN) (FT) (FT) TYPE (FT /FT) (FPS) (PPS) (FT) (FT) CALC CALC (FT) (FT) CALC CK REMARKS 1 HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE CONTROL - 288.40 2 9.7 10 0 0.40 1.20 PART 0.00853 24.7 9.1 286.90 304.42 287.31 305.29 0.41 0.87 0.00 0.00 3 9.6 IS 0 1.11 1.20 PART 0.00835 6.7 6.3 304.75 306.00 305.88 307.20 1.13 1.20 307.95 0.00 X 0.00 X(N) • 109.98 V 1, FL 1, D 1 AND HG 1 REFER TO DOWNSTREAM END V 3, FL 2, D 3 AND HG 3 REFER TO UPSTREAM ENO X - DISTANCE IN FEET FROM DOWNSTREAM END TO POINT WHERE HO INTERSECTS SOFFIT IN SEAL CONDITION X(N) - DISTANCE IN FEET FROM DOWNSTREAM £ND TO POINT WHERE WATER SURFACE REACHES NORMAL DEPTH BY EITHER DRAWDOWN OR BACKWATER X(J) - DISTANCE IN FEET FROM DOWNSTREAM END TO POINT WHERE HYDRAULIC JUMP OCCURS IN LINE F(J) - THE COMPUTED FORCE AT THE HYDRAULIC JUMP D(SJ) - DEPTH OF WATER BEFORE THE HYDRAULIC JUMP (UPSTREAM SIDE) D(AJ) - DEPTH OF WATER AFTER THE HYDRAULIC JUMP (DOWNSTREAM SIDE) SEAL INDICATES FLOW CHANGES FROM PART TO FULL OR FROM FULL TO PART HYD JUMP INDICATES THAT FLOW CHANGES FROM SUPERCRITICAL TO SUBCRITICAL THROUGH A HYDRAULIC JUMP NJ 0 UST INDICATES THAT HYDRAULIC JUMP OCCURS AT THE JUNCTION AT THE UPSTREAM END OF THE LINE NJ 0 DJT INDICATES THAT HYDRAULIC JUMP OCCURS AT THE JUNCTION AT THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE LINE EOJ 6/ 8/1999 15:58 IV Li ne 1 Worksheet Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Worksheet Circular Channel Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Fonmu Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coeffic 0.016 Slope 47000 % Diameter 36 in Discharge 9.90 cfs Results Depth 0.54 ft G' Flow Area 0.9 ft' Wetted Penme 2.63 ft Top Width 2.30 ft Critical Depth 1.00 It Percent Full 18.0 % Critical Slope 0.5912 % Velocity 11.45 fVs Velocity Head 2.04 ft Specific Energ, 2.58 ft Froude Numbe 3.30 Maximum Disc 150.89 cfs Discharge Full 140.27 cfs Slope Full 0.0334 % Flow Type supercritical Project Engineer H&A Employee h: \flowdata\0294 \nmlwr.fm2 Hunsaker 8 Associates FlowMaster v6.0 (614b] 08/11/99 05.24.19 PM 0 Haestad Methods. Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury. CT 06706 USA (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 zinne, 2� Worksheet Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Worksheet Circular Channel Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formu Solve For Channel Depth Input Data It Mannings Coeffic 0.016 Slope /0.0000 % Diameter 36 in Discharge 10.40 cfs Results Depth 0.50 ft 4-- Flow Area 0.8 ft' Wetted Perime 2.53 It Top Width 2.24 ft Critical Depth 1.02 ft Percent Full 16.7 % Critical Slope 0.5921 % Velocity 13.38 ft/s Velocity Head 2.78 ft Specific Energ 3.28 ft Froude Numbe 4.00 Maximum Disc 184.34 cfs Discharge Full 171.36 cfs Slope Full 0.0368 % Flow Type supercritical Project Engineer H&A Employee h.N lowdata \0294 \nmlwr. fm2 Hunsaker 3 Associates FlowMaster v6.0 (614bi 08/11/99 05.24 45 PM 0 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 LING Worksheet Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Worksheet Circular Channel Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formu Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coehic 0.016 Slope 71000 % Diameter 36 in Discharge 0.40 cfs Results Depth 0.12 R 4!E— Flow Area 0.1 ft' Wetted Penme 1.19 R Top Wdlh 1.15 R Critical Depth 0.19 R Percent Full 3.9 % Critical Slope 0.7769 % Velocity 4.46 ft /s Velocity Head 0.31 R Specific Energ 0.42 R Froude Numbe 2.82 Maximum Disc 156.41 cfs Discharge Full 145.41 ds Slope Full 0.0001 Flow Type >upercritical Project Engineer: HSA Employee h: \flowdata \0294 \nmlwr. fm2 Hunsaker 8 Associates FlowMaster v6.0 (614b] 08/11/99 05'.25.17 PM 0 Haestad Methods. Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755 -1566 Page 1 of 1 LInC 4 Worksheet Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Worksheet Circular Channel Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formu Solve For Channel Depth Input Data ft Mannings Coeffic 0.016 Slope 42000 % Diameter 36 in Discharge 1.00 cfs Results Depth 0.18 ft F-- Flow Area 0.2 ft' Wetted Perime 1.50 ft Top Wdth 1.44 ft Critical Depth 0.31 ft Percent Full 6.1 % Critical Slope 0.6903 % Velocity 5.60 Ws Velocity Head 0.49 It Specific Energ• 0.67 ft Froude Numbe 2.80 Maximum Disc 145.15 cfs Discharge Full 134.93 cfs Slope Full 0.0003 % Flow Type supercritical Project Engineer H&A Employee h 9flowdata \0294 \nmlwr.fm2 Hunsaker & Associates FlowMaster v8.0 (614b) 08/11/99 05:25:58 PM ® Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 bna 5 Worksheet Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Worksheet Circular Channel Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formu Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coeffc 0.016 Slope ! 0.0000 % Diameter 36 in Discharge 10.90 cfs Results Depth 0.51 ft Flow Area 0.8 W Wetted Perime 2.56 If Top Width 2.26 ft Critical Depth 1.05 It Percent Full 17.1 % Critical Slope 0.5931 % Velocity 13.57 ft/s Velocity Head 2.86 ft Specific Energ, 3.37 ft Froude Numbe 4.01 Maximum Disc 184.34 cfs Discharge Full 171.36 cis Slope Full 0.0405 % Flow Type supercritical Project Engineer: H &A Employee h: V1owdata \0294 \nmlwr. fm2 Hunsaker & Associates FlowMaster v6.0 (614bj 08/11/99 05:26:40 PM Z Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755 -1666 Page t of 1 Max ditch capacity, 6" freeboard, n =.016 Merged Graphs for Circular Channel Project Description Project File c:\haestad \fmw \ditches.fm2 Solve For Discharge Discharge vs Channel Slope 200.0 --- ---r-- - - - -r- r------ r---- --r-- ---- r---- ---- ----- r---- - -I 2'Wide — — - 2.5' Wide I I I I I I I I I - - -- - 3' Wide — - - 3.5' Wide I I I I I I I I I 4' Wide 180.0 -------------------------------- --------------------- - --- --- - -- -- 4'Modified I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 160.0 _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 140.0 ------ ` - - - - -- ------ - - - -- -I - ------ ------ 'I ---- 'I - - - - - ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II 1 20.0 I I I I I I I - - - - - -� - ---- - ----- ------- ------- ----- --'------- '------- I I I I I I I I ,J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J '- " I I I I I I I / I I I I I I I I /- I I I I I I I i I 2) 100.0 ,----/ ______'__ _ ___ ------- ' ------- ------- ------- � - - -__ -! I U I I I I I I I I 80.0 _ ______I '_ _ _� _ _- - -- !,I ----- 'I _/__' _/'I --------------- - - - __ _�_ ! _- _/_" _ _�_1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II mo_- I I I I � I I � I I I I I I I I I I 60.0 -I ----- I "' -- - --' r- ----- 1-! r - -- - -! r - - - -- - I Yr r I I J I I I I I I 40.0 20.0 - - -' ______ti_ -------------------- i I I I I I I I I I O.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Channel Slope ( %) OV10197 FlowMaster v5.13 02:00:20 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 North Mesa - Lower Drainage Study NORTH MESA - LOWER INTERNAL ENERGY DISSIPATOR RINGS DESIGN: PIPE DIAMETER, D = 18 inches SELECT RING HEIGHT FOR THE THREE DOWNSTREAM ELEMENTS: 0.06'D < K, :S 0.09'D where D = pipe diameter (inches) Kd = ring height of downstream elements (inches) 1.08 < Kd < 1.62 SELECT Kd = 1.5 inches USE Kd = 3.0 inches SELECT A RING HEIGHT FOR THE SINGLE UPSTREAM ELEMENT: 0.12'D < K„ < 0.18'D 2.16 <K„ <3.24 SELECT K„ = 2Kd = 3 inches I SELECT THE SPACING, Ld FOR THE THREE DOWNSTREAM ELEMENTS: 1.5'D < Ld < 2.5'D where Ld = spacing from downstream elements (feet) 2.25 <Ld<3.75 "SELECT Ld = 4 feet SELECT THE SPACING, L. FOR THE SINGLE UPSTREAM ELEMENT: 2Ld<L„ <2Ld 4.5 < L„ < 7.5' "SELECT L. = 21-d = 8 feet where L„ = spacing from upstream elements (feet) OUTLET PIPES LENGTH = 24 feet (assuming width of each ring = 2 ft) DETERMINE CROSS SECTIONAL AREA AT LAST DOWNSTREAM ELEMENT: Dd = D - 2Kd = 15 inches A = 1.23 ft2 DETERMINE THE REDUCED OUTLET VELOCITY, Vd: DESIGN FLOWRATE, Q = 9.7 cfs so Vd = Q/A = 7.9 fps 'Note: Size increase to meet standard manufactured ring. "Note: Lengths increased to meet standard manufactured lengths. ROW I,_10291119GPA2E doc u North Mesa - Lower Drainage Study NORTH MESA - LOWER CURB INLET SIZING BASED ON THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL SAMPLE CALCULATIONS = 3.6 CFS FROM CITY OF SAN DIEGO CHART 1- 103.6C H = PONDED DEPTH = 10 IN. H = height of curb inlet = 6 in. H/h = 1.7 Q/L = H/h Solving for L, L = 5.0 feet ROM x:�YL9x1199PA2e.eK ...M 132 'WIM INLET # NODE STEET SLOPE Q(CFS) a (in.) y (in.) L (ft.) (INLET (fSj SIZE SUMP 1 110 N/A 9.7 N/A N/A 5.7 7 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS = 3.6 CFS FROM CITY OF SAN DIEGO CHART 1- 103.6C H = PONDED DEPTH = 10 IN. H = height of curb inlet = 6 in. H/h = 1.7 Q/L = H/h Solving for L, L = 5.0 feet ROM x:�YL9x1199PA2e.eK ...M 132 'WIM North Mesa - Lower Drainage Study Note: The required rock class per the table below is No. 2 backing based on the 7.9 fps reduced outlet velocity calculated on the previous page. However, a rock class of facing is specified to compensate for the anticipated minor velocity increase due to the increase in length between energy dissipator rings to meet standard manufactured lengths. Table 1 Stone for Riprap' (PERCENTAGE LARGER THAN)` Rock Sizes CLASSES Filter Blanket (3) Vel. Rock 2 3 2 Ton 1 Ton A, Ton '/. Ton (1) (2) "T" Lower Layer Opt.1 Backing Backing 4 Ton 0 -5 (6) 2 Ton 50 -100 0 -5 6-7 No.3 0.6 1 Ton 95-100 50 -100 0 -5 Backing A, Ton — 50 -100 0 -5 No 2 1.0 '/. Ton B3 95-100 — 50 -100 Backing 2001b 95 -100 — Facing 1.4 751b — D.G. — 95 -100 0 -5 251b 1�7' 9.5-11 25-75 0 -5 51b — 1 Ai P.B. — 11 -13 90.100 25-75 1 to 1 1W. B Sand 13 -15 '/: Ton 90 -100 Table 2 Selection of Riprap and Filter Blanket Material" 'The amount of material smaller than the smallest size listed in the table for any class of rock slope protection shall not exceed the percentage limit listed in the table determined on a weight basis. Compliance with the percentage limit shown in the table for all other sizes of the individual pieces of any class of rock slope protection shall be determined by the ratio of the number of individual pieces larger than the smallest size listed in the table for that class. ' 1997 Regional Supplement Amendments to "Greenbook" Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 1997 ed. County of San Diego Public Works, January 1997. Ao..a.: 02.11 w.ueo o. am.uz IMIM Filter Blanket (3) Vel. Rock Riprap FVSec Class Thickness Upper Layer(s) (1) (2) "T" Lower Layer Opt.1 Opt.2 Opt.3 (6) Sec. 200 (4) Sec. 400 (4) (5) 6-7 No.3 0.6 3116' C2 0. G. — Backing 7-8 No 2 1.0 ' /.' B3 D.G. — Backing 8 -9.5 Facing 1.4 318' — D.G. — 1�7' 9.5-11 Light 10 ' / :" — 1 Ai P.B. — 11 -13 % Ton 2.7 1 1W. B Sand 13 -15 '/: Ton 3.4 1" — / ' 1 Ai P.B. Sand 15-17 1 Ton T 4.3 1 Af" — Type B Sand 17 -20 2 Ton 5.4 2" — Type B Sand 'The amount of material smaller than the smallest size listed in the table for any class of rock slope protection shall not exceed the percentage limit listed in the table determined on a weight basis. Compliance with the percentage limit shown in the table for all other sizes of the individual pieces of any class of rock slope protection shall be determined by the ratio of the number of individual pieces larger than the smallest size listed in the table for that class. ' 1997 Regional Supplement Amendments to "Greenbook" Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 1997 ed. County of San Diego Public Works, January 1997. Ao..a.: 02.11 w.ueo o. am.uz IMIM VI CHART 1 -103.6 A CAPACITY OF CURB OPENING INLETS ASSUMED 2% CROWN. Q = 0.71- (A +Y)3/2 *A = 0.33 Y = HEIGHT OF WATER AT CURB FACE (0.4' MAXIMUM) REFER TO CHART 1- 104.12 L = LENGTH OF CLEAR OPENING OF INLET *Use A =0 when the inlet is adjacent to traffic; i.e., for a Type "J" median inlet or where the parking lane is removed. REV. I I CITY OF SAN DIEGO - DESIGN GUIDE I $HT. N0. CAPACITY OF CURB OPENING INLETS Ar ME imp jl�m COMITY OF SAN DIEGO FLOOD CONTROL OF SANITATION G 100 -YEAR G -� IOU Prl� ECIPI 1 ATI11.0Yl FLOOD COIITftOL ItYi.i li l9 ��[ IY 1 k.➢ '-20,/ ISOPLUVIALS OF 100 -YEAR 6-HOUR 6 PRECIPITATION IN ENTIMS OF AN H4CII 451 2� �I�- No I y Lmi 1. A D[ACII - I .1y qg� 301 i t 1 SAN C[ l:EN I[ \ 30 `. 151 r 1 21 ,- - 2 , 33° 11[[l1AR MK 1151 - 1 �- ..__..._. U.S, DEPARTAIER I' OP C011AIEIZCE "ATIONAL OCEANIC AND AT' O31•IIERIC AD)tIN ISTRATtOII 6PEC1AL STUDIES DRANCII. OFFICR OF UROLOGY, NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE 11 301 I- 4. Ila1 1151 301 6 I. 151 ll)° 0151 IA[CCA (•'�� . II) 27.5• 301 151 116' N' I I LEGEND 212 INDRATES NODENUMBER INDICATES SUBAREABOUNDARY (7.9EAC. INDICATES SUBAREA ACREAGE r INDICATES D/RECTIONOF FLOW. (v�Iwar ael-r>,ee eme�rcroissrvnnom) PREPARED BY: HYDROLOGY MAP SHEET ^NsI ^DES NORTH MESA -LOWER oP City of Encinitas, California 1 R `o�s�oo „soa 9 I I f � IN € t AA1 moo? Lon J _h tV I'll Nfll Ely ry -anal �� 1 i Y�yll i�„C ��$�{`�� r i III o �r f� : tier Err all j pr r 71 1 1 4 / M v it iL' � li��I+ �����` �� %/, -�� \�,14;� {e � � �t4� V ��� � `. t �'� �.; �'���vj ro-tl�.� �? % A, / i ri 'b / ids s,W ��� / �/ , y a //� �/� I� r HYDR OLO 4Y M P -NCR18 MESA LOWER��� NATURAL UNDKIONS PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING IRVINE LAS VEGAS RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO DAVE HANINIAR JACK HILL LEX WILLWAN 10179 Huennek"S SI. Sui le 200 San Dlepo. CA 9'21 21 (6191 538.4100 PH (519) 338 -141.7 FX w,vwlwnsakeccnm Inm9Htm•ake6D.rom HUNSAKER &ASSOATES > A N D I CIC O. i, C SEWER STUDY for �. , wV iS Tu e NORTH MESA - LOWERAuTRORi Ty- in the City of Encinitas Prepared for: Barratt American Homes 2035 Corte Del Nogal Suite 160 Carlsbad, CA 92009 w.o. 294 -132 June 9, 1999 Raymond L. Martin, R.C.E. Project Manager Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. �OQFyOFESS /OHq M ��� ��Op1D 1. 7 Z m k NO. 4670 1 A Exp. 6 /30!00 9� OF CAUFd� AD wC Ms fdtuocser eeCo a:pn4�c02N%1 91002 eop wo913U 0bo9/99 lu ac North Mesa - Lower Sewer Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Design Criteria Results of Velocity Calculations Sewer Study Map SECTION RDkd mswdrmllp NencomsSpndn6'0294',19991d92 do[ .919 13 M0"9 North Mesa - Lower Sewer Study Design Criteria Demand 238 gal /day /d.u. Peak Factor 3.8 Maximum Depth /2 diameter Roughness, n 0.013 for PVC RD kd ms" rdl11pcservehcprespndnc1029411999W029 c wo919-13 0&09/99 I .ser Name: Roberti) Project: NENG DATA N.M. LONER jbproject: 308 - sewer North CONTROL TYPE: ALIGN R 0 A D C A L C PROFILE PT CODE: sewer PROFILE Date: 06-08 -99 Time: 10:41:59 Page: 1 blur. Lcri X31 awrc PT Cwc: I"K•; I2 4, F• PIPE LtJE 'f' #VUN y/ yc4 am f 2002.00 IEO 0.11 5t4 P PItYI $ t 20+00.00 .14.000 107.51 Lt N E \1 3 2 248.5 1 f 2109.51 tt1 295.06 m. V1. Ar 11 -5.000 4.00 2 f 2113.51 *UT 294 -86 21 * 11.51 -1.000 273.79 1 G1N6 1� l2 8 I$ 3 f 2387.30 %m 292.12 -5.000 �•u•'\ 10 4.00 4 f 2391.30 cuT 291.92 ,1 'G Z9 +84.30 -1.000 89.94 L,tNE 5 f 2481.24 IrJ 291.02 M. •ly 9 -5.000 4.00 6 f 2485.24 o0i 290.82 2+4 83 24- i7 •1.000 126.26 L\NE a it 1.4- 7 f 2611.50 14 289.56 N•N - 4 8 -5.000 4.00 8 f 2615.50 OJT 289.36 ,y- Z` +13.5 6 `C 1-I -1.000 346.00 L1P6 i li \. 9 f 2961.50 I N7 285.90 M. H. 1 -5.000 4.00 10 f 2965.50 OUT 285.70 1 ZR +(i3.SO `e (► -1.000 142.30 tic oE 11 f 3107.80 10 284.28 ^i• µ, -5.000 4.00 12 f 3111.80 a0T 284.08 31 t 64, 8O ZI -1.365 177.00 tat S 13 1.(0 13 f 3288.80 tJ 281.66 4 5 -5.000 4.00 14 f 3292.80 OJT 281.46 3Z +40.80 -1.900 203.33 1i.1 E 4• 15 f 3496.13 114 277.60 M µ 4 -5.000 4.00 16 f 3500.13 COT 277.40 � 34 +q$.13 'E9 -1.200 348.19 INE 3 3l 2.0 17 f 3848.32 147 273.22 m-}4. 4 3 -5.000 4.00 18 f 3852.32 4 0 273.02 38 +50.32 -1.000 141.51 L.taE z 54- 34 I,q 19 f 3993.83 17.7 271.60 M. H•. Z -5.000 4.00 � 134 20 f 3997.83 o.7T 271.40 3y , g s. a 3 s 4 Q -1.000 140.35 - I,IrJc 1 � 1• ` EOP f 4138.18 ttJ 270.00 p.\ 41 4 I 1 II �. w r . tw r Z pol 5T t f•1 6'1 II I NORTH MESA LOWER IOCATlD /N �-4 ENCINITAS, CA it BY BARR47TAMERICAN HOMES 17 I 1 � 1 ' e / 4 5 8 7 I I 2 15 14 HVNSAKER A AS90CIA MSANO/EOQ INC w.wrc - ootnsc - s�Mlwc TTon Noiofu6 5%n - sw awq a =121 on ne-sm - ra (uq a 1414 Fole name: R: \0021 \0021ZE01 1 / 1 I 1 I I 1 I Y� 1 - 1 I 1D � � 1 r 19 11 I 1 \I i I MH /812 I1 � r - �S .Y MH13 `l Y � I �t ENE i1WH 16 \ NORTH MESA UPPER NOTE: DRELLING UNITS PER UNAPP OVED TENTATIVE MAP MH15 ill Encinitas Ranch Community Association 9610 Waples Street (858) 550 -7900 San Diego, CA 92121 -1992 (800) 448 -7601 WWW.NNJ.COM FAX. (858) 550 -7919 October 3, 1002 Remailed on November 21, 2002 I NOV 2 2 ZOOZ J 62t.,- Joshua Fink 1 'o;c ae'4' Barran American Homes 9 - - Z 5950 Priestly Dr. Carlsbad CA. 92009 RE. Turnover of Hardscape at Quail Ridge II (aka Quail Hollow) Dear Mr. Fink: I write to you on behalf of the Board of Directors for Encinitas Ranch Community Association. This is to confirm the acceptance by the Association of the hardscape components of Quail Hollow including the concrete swales, drains, sidewalks, asphalt streets and stamped concrete per our final walk through inspection completed on Friday, September 17, 2002 attended by yourself, Heather Kamps - Collins, Homeowner /Board Member, Mike Valles, Consultant representing the City of Encinitas, and myself (Brad tiller- Management Representative of N.N. Jaeschke, Inc.) As was indicated Barran American will continue to monitor the stamped concrete at the entry to the community due to cracking which is taking place but which was deemed acceptable because at the time of the final walk through inspection. It is the Association's understanding that the warranty on these items will remain effect for the next 12 months. In addition, per the recommendation of Mike Valles, management for the Association has calendared an inspection for early next September 2003 to review the accepted areas. Please forward this letter onto City officials and any other individual or organization which may be an interested party. Sincerely, 7o� #4 Brad Miller, Property Manager For the Board of Directors Cc: Board of Directors Mike Valles, Consultant for the City ofFncinitas FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER HER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE �r RECOMMENDATIONS: SIGNATURE ,OPIES TO: GEOPACIFICA GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721-5488 FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 10 FIELD REPORT To ja // !e /' C SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNS WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE GEOPACMCA SIGNATURE GEOTEM41CAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721 -5488 SPIES To: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT TO�� SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: /J9- 7'%n2_ DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT 76 . 114 ialld, LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: /J9- 7'%n2_ DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT 76 . 114 ialld, LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE GEOPACMCA SIGNATURE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTAN'T'S TEL: (760) 721-5488 ,OPIESTO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT TO SUMMARY OF INSPECTION' DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT / LOCATION CONTRACTOR ER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE RECOMMENDATIONS: GEOPACIRCA SIGNATURE GEOTECBNICAL CONSULTAN'T'S TEL: (760) 721-5488 OPIESTO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT TO •,cy c "'y PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER Q u,nnnnDV nC lKlCDCrTinni- DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE RECOMMENDATIONS: GEOPACIRCA SIGNATURE GEOTECHMCAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721 -5488 `IES TO: FAX: ( 760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT TO o.?(''�. PROJECT NO. PROJECT iM n .4 , YJD �tI ( - �r . SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP PRESENT AT SITE SIGNATURE PIES TO: GEOPACIFICA GEOTECBNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721 -5488 FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT TO CONTRACTOR 6'0�L --UT TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE SIGNATURE UPIESTO: GEOPACIFICA GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721 -5488 FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY S1., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 * FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT TO xi _ agli ! WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE Lc- SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE RECOMMENDATIONS: SIGNATURE PIES TO: GEOPAMICA GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721-5488 FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE I4 Ah RECOMMENDATIONS: SIGNATURE PIES TO: GEOPACIFICA GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721 -5488 FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 �; FIELD REPORT DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCADON CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TENW. PRESENT AT SITE SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: &,e-l-) 7 -af onC Aev-A- SIGNATURE PIES TO: GEOPACMCA GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721 -5488 FAX: (760) 721-5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST. SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92064 FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE SIGNATURE ,OPIES TO: GEOPACIFICA GEOTECBNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721 -5488 FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT SI IMMAPY OF IMPFCTION, DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER I TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE r RECOMMENDATIONS: GEOPACIRCA SIGNATURE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721-5488 COPIES TO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT i SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR ER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE RECOMMENDATIONS: GEOPA(HICA SIGNATURE GEOTECi LAICAL CONSULTANTS TEL; (760) 721 -5488 COPIES TO: FAX; (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT e 1. SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: PRESENT AT SITE a:�]IISUC'�7 RECOMMENDATIONS: GEOPACMCA SIGNATURE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721.5488 COPIES TO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT e1 MAAAr n n.icocrnnni. DATE PROJECT NQ PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE 0-3— eq 7 -0 / —f. a:.e 03- 03- a9 -0/ G2r�drf /b. L GEOPACMCA SIGNATURE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721-5488 COPIES TO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT TO� SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT K LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWN WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE RECOMMENDATIONS: GEOPACIRCA SIGNATURE GEOTECBNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721-5488 COPIES TO: FAX: ( 760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 - FIELD REPORT To stY ..&L4ia'�i .0 %y. C SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO, PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE n i i i .-L r t /t/zI /.TI. t/_ /" _ .. /�T. 4 — / "A_/_ '0/n ,,A`n4 ",_. -/-/'.Q .. 0 RECOMMENDATIONS: GEOPACMCA SIGNATURE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721 -5488 .OPIES TO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE GEOPACMCA SIGNATURE GEOTECBMCAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721-5488 OPIESTO: FAX: (760) 721-5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT TO Ll� L'e SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE GEOPACMICA SIGNATURE GEOTECBNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721 -5488 OPIES"TO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT TO t .ALL `J - SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE O/ od -Z GEOPACMCA SIGNATURE GEOTECEINICAL CONSULTAN'T'S TEL: (760) 721-5488 ,OPIESTO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT TOSS5--{/ DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE SUMMARY • o INSPECTION: GEOPACIRCA SIGNATURE GEOTECBMCAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721-5488 OPIESTO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE. CA 92054 FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: n/— ny- n / RECOMMENDATIONS: DATE PROJECT NO, PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE zz - Z24i e GEOPACIRCA SIGNATURE GEOTECBMCAL CONSULTANT'S TEL: (760) 721 -5488 ORES TO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT i SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TENW. PRESENT AT SITE O/— A c/— m GEOPA(MCA SIGNATURE GEOITA LAICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721-5488 ,OPIES TO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92064 FIELD REPORT loswism I ._ SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR rIC ER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE GEOPA(MCA SIGNATURE GEOTECHNICAL CONSALTANPS TEL: (760) 721 -5488 PIES TO: FAX: (760) 721-5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. - PROJECT ro ..f— CONTRACTOR �G�LCe �.c .�-t- PRESENT AT SITE � • �IC�IGI" SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. - PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE GEOPACIRCA SIGNATURE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721 -5488 APIES TO: FAX: ( 760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT • / i / C SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: WrAVAIK�Zff� OW WANm' " DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION i CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE GU . l�1SL RECOMMENDATIONS: GEOPACIRCA SIGNATURE GEOTECEIMCAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721-5488 -OPIES TO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT ,,M_c i TOTS . 1•,I DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE Az' Z4 i; ` RECOMMENDATIONS: SIGNATURE *PIES TO: GEOPACIFICA GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721 -5488 FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE SIGNATURE OPIES TO: GEOPACMCA GEOTECEINICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760)721.5488 FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: 0 SIGNATURE i X)PIES TO: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT Al SITE /-A• GEOPACIFICA GEOTECBNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721-5488 FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 iIIII I ,T / -I w l Il /-A• GEOPACIFICA GEOTECBNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721-5488 FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: DATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR OWNER HER I TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE i / / -ZZ-OU ,_ :i �,rti' . GEOPACIRCA SIGNATURE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS TEL: (760) 721-5488 �oPIES TO: FAX: (760) 721 -5539 3060 INDUSTRY ST., SUITE 105 OCEANSIDE. CA 92054 pNike Valles - Fwd: e: treet ig is on Lauren Court Page 1 From: Greg Shields To: insp Date: 11/6/02 3:43PM Subject: Fwd: Re: Street Lights on Lauren Court I am forwarding this e-mail for all inspectors to read to get a flavor of how our work is perceived and how it ends up being our problem to solve. I thought Lin's response was accurate. The problem is Barratt - what a shock! Mike, have you heard from our buddy, Mr. Sanchez.. If the lights are not energized yet, I want to fax Barratt a fix it note first thing every day. greg Mike alles - e: Street Lights on Lauren Court From: Lin Wurbs To: Russell Geyser Date: 11/6/02 2:07PM Subject: Re: Street Lights on Lauren Court Mr. Geyser, Ater investigating the reported outage at Lauren Court, we have found through our Engineering Department that the lights and all improvements to this street belong to the HOA (Home Owners Association) and was built by Barrett Construction. Greg Shields of the City's Engineering Department has made contact with Sue Button of SDG &E to have her contact the developer, Barrett, to have the lights energized and activated. It is my understanding from our Engineering folks, namely Greg Shields that the maintenance responsibilities for the lights and infrastructure will be paid for out of your HOA dues. For further clarification on this matter you may want to be in contact yourself with your HOA to ensure that the developer takes responsibility and appropriate action to activate the lights. We are sorry for the extended time it took to research this subject but it is a complicated relationship between the developer and SDG &E. In this particular regard, the City has no ability to activate the lights, we can only act as a conduit for information flow, which we have done with SDG&E. I realize that this is not exactly the answer you wanted, but unfortunately this is not with our scope or control. If there is anything we can assist you on, please do not hesitate to contact me. My direct line is 633 -2763. Lin >>> "Russell Geyser" <RussGeyser @adelphia.net> 10/29/02 9:01:42 AM >>> Lin, I have written and called several times to various members of your staff (including a message to you 7 months ago) to attempt to get the street lights on Lauren Court turned on. It is inexcusable that you have not seen to this. As you also should be aware, there was a rape in our neighborhood at night several weeks ago. What will it take to get the lights turned on? A murder? Pay attention - this is your job, but it is our safety. The lights have been installed for almost a year. See to it - so that we can see. Russell Geyser The Angry Homeowners of Lauren Court CC: Andy Bullington; Greg Shields; Peter Cota - Robles T - Mike Valles - e: Quail ar ens Drive - arrett . damage to parkway and median Page 1 From: Mike Valles To: Mike Wells Date: 1/4/01 11:32AM Subject: Re: Quail Gardens Drive - Barrett damage to parkway and median Roger -over! I left word with both Hazard and Barran that they are to notify me inadvance so that you can come out and meet with us on repairs. mikev.com >>> Mike Wells 01104/01 08:50AM >>> Mike: The landscaping and irrigation on Quail Gardens Drive adjacent to the Barrett North Mesa project was damage first by equipment zing during grading, then the median was dug up at a water main (and may have undermined the street). Per meeting this morning with Greg Shields, I understand that Hazard has directed ECI to make repairs. I would appreciate if you could keep me informed when you see any action on this. Thanks. Mike Mike Wells Parks Supervisor City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 760 633 -2747 mwells(d,)ci.encinitas.ca.us Mike Valles - North Mesa Upper (Horton) age t j From: Mike Valles To: Greg Shields Date: 3/7/01 4:37PM Subject: North Mesa Upper {Horton} FYI, Had meeting with reps. of D.R.Horton ,advised them that the walking trail along the southside of their project had to be completed shortly after the rainy season. I was told by the project manager that the trail was not a part of their contract when they bought it from Cornerstone. Don't be suprised if you get a call . also their entry has enhanced concrete {same as Barratt} suggested that they contact Mike Castaneda for futher direction, must be done soon since they will be looking for occupacy by end of March. any questions mikev.com. CC: Phillip Cotton Mike Valles - Quail Gardens Drive - arrett amage to parkway and median Page e From: Mike Wells To: Mike Valles Date: 1/4/01 8:50AM Subject: Quail Gardens Drive - Barrett damage to parkway and median Mike: The landscaping and irrigation on Quail Gardens Drive adjacent to the Barrett North Mesa project was damage first by equipment xing during grading, then the median was dug up at a water main (and may have undermined the street). Per meeting this morning with Greg Shields, I understand that Hazard has directed ECI to make repairs. I would appreciate if you could keep me informed when you see any action on this. Thanks. Mike Mike Wells Parks Supervisor City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 760 633 -2747 mwells @ci.encinitas.ca.us CC: Greg Shields; Phillip Cotton Mike Valles - Mesa North -Lower Page 1 From: Jeff Garami To: Mike Valles Date: 1/29/01 3:42PM Subject: Mesa North Lower Barratt American has dropped lumber at the site. I only have a conditional rough grading approval. Have you approved a full rough grading release? If not please stop the job. Otherwise update our paperwork. Thanks. Jeffrey S. Garami Engineering Technician City of Encinitas e -mail: jgarami @ci.encinitas.ca.us [Mike Valles - lower north mesa pix From: Greg Shields 7o: Mike Valles Date: 2/1/01 8:08AM Subject: lower north mesa pix Page Mike Valles - Lower North Mesa age 7 From: Greg Shields To: Alan Archibald; GLADIOLA; Greg Shields; Mike Valles; Sandra Maluia Date: 2/5/01 7:57AM Subject: Lower North Mesa Place: GLADIOLA I have a meeting scheduled for 9 am with Barratt regarding working under a stop notice. Last Thursday Barratt started breaking their lumber out in anticipation of starting of framing. They were reacquainted with the standards. Friday Barratt started their framing while still under a stop work notice. They were however; told the only work stopped was framing until the site work was completed per the preconstruction conference. ike Valles - w etter to Barratt Page 1 From: Greg Shields To: Mike Valles Date: 2/26/01 11:49AM Subject: Fwd: Letter to Barratt ike Valles - Barratt lower age 1 From: Mike Valles To: Greg Shields Date: 2/27/01 7:24AM Subject: Barratt lower 16 I may be wrong, but it seems to me that Castaneda was to write the letter with conditions and Barratt was to sign that letter confirming the conditions for the construction of the entry.!!!!! mikev.com. Mike Valles - Re: Barrett lower 16 Page 1 From: Greg Shields To: Mike Valles Date: 2/27/01 7:51 AM Subject: Re: Barratt lower 16 Mike You are correct and I placed a copy of the letter on your desk. To the best of my knowledge, they have yet to sign it. Greg >>> Mike Valles 02/27/01 07:24AM >>> I may be wrong, but it seems to me that Castaneda was to write the letter with conditions and Barratt was to sign that letter confirming the conditions for the construction of the entryAHN mikev.com. Mike Valles - Fwd: Barrett Project - ower North Mesa an scape ua i ar ens Drive)age From: Diane Langager To: bmezan @barrattamerican.com; rsanchez @barrattamerican.com; slar-asse@drhorton.com Date: 7/23/01 1:31 PM Subject: Fwd: Barratt Project - Lower North Mesa ( Landscape Quail Gardens Drive) Please proceed in getting landscape maintenance easements for these areas. For ease and efficiency I recommend that you request Randy Safino to do the work since he knows the projects. Please have the draft work completed within a month. We want the improvements completed and the easements recorded prior to final sign off on the last residence. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 633 -2714 or Phil Cotton at 633 -2746. CC: Greg Shields; Masih Maher; Phillip Cotton; Valles, Mike Mike Valles - final inspection approval of the last unit and bond release at Lower North Mesa. Page7 From: Diane Langager To: bmezan @barrattamerican.com; rsanchez @barrattamerican.com Date: 9/20/01 4:37PM Subject: final inspection approval of the last unit and bond release at Lower North Mesa The following needs to be completed prior to final approval of the last unit: - Landscape easement document(s) shall be submitted for plan check to the Engineering Department. After first plan check if the documents are for the most part complete and accurate we will sign off. Bonds will be held up until such time that the documents are approved and recorded. - The additional plantings required for the major slopes shall be installed, inspected, and approved. An inspection with Terra Firma representative and Community Development staff shall be conducted. - A letter shall be submitted by the project sign company which includes sign specs (as ordered) and the proposed installation timeline. As long as the sign specs are in conformance with the approved plans the installation of the sign will not be required prior to final inspection approval of the last unit. The following list itemizes the remaining issues that need to be resolved and /or completed prior to Community Development authorization for bond release: - Staff is concerned that the gate installed at the sewer easement is unauthorized. Removable bollards are acceptable. Resolution of this issue and all associated improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Engineering Inspector prior to bond relase. Consult with Mike Valles of the Engineering Department (633 -2807) on this issue. -The approved sign shall be installed and approved by the Community Development Department. -All landscape easement documents shall be recorded. CC: Knowlton, James; Phillip Cotton; Shields, Greg, Valles, Mike Mike Vales - gate/ballards at lower north mesa Page From: Diane Langager To: Mike Valles Date: 9/25/01 2 08P Subject: gate /ballards at lower north mesa we need to finalize this issue - I still have Barratt calling me. Will you come see me this afternoon. I will be here until 6. ike Valles - No.Mesa lower Page 1 From: Mike Valles To: Diane Langager Date: 9/27/01 4:05PM Subject: No.Mesa lower Had a call from Dan Lopez, He said he will take out the gate and will install the M -16 bollards {you sweet talking devil you} 3 evenly spaced. mikev.com. .. -- rke- Valles e sa : No.Me ower Page 1 Mi From: Diane Langager To: Valles, Mike Date: 9/27/01 5:44PM Subject: Re: No.Mesa lower Dan does whatever I want ..... HA!!!!! Hope you have a great week -end. di >>> Mike Valles 09/27/01 04:05PM >>> Had a call from Dan Lopez, He said he will take out the gate and will install the M -16 bollards {you sweet talking devil you} 3 evenly spaced. mikev.com. Mike Valles -North Mesa lowerBarran From: Mike Valles To: Greg Shields Date: 7/31/02 4:59PM Subject: North Mesa lower Barratt I spoke to Mrs. Cook and advised her that there will be work going on Lauren ct. next week and they may have to wait a few minutes because of the grinding and paving but the streets will be passable. I was unable to reach mr.Josh. but I will get to him tomorrow eary (I hope ) and let him know that there will not be any closure .............. mike Page 1 1 RECORDING REQUESTED: Dana M. Seguin Hunsaker & Associates San Diego. Inc. 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, CA 92121 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of Encinitas City Clerk 5050 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 THE ORI 4AL DF THIS DGftK-NT YAS RECORDED ON AUD 20, 2002 DLTTIli NI flUKER 2002 -07MO GREGORY J. SPiITH, COLIHP/ RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 3 :25 PM SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION (Pursuant to Section 66469 of the Subdivision Map Act or Section 8770.5 of the Land Surveyor's Act as they may be amended.) NOTICE IS GIVEN that Tract No. 98 -171, Map No. 14057 in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego. State of California, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said county, October 19, 2000, is in error and is corrected in accordance with Section 8770 5 of the Land Surveyors Act or Section 66469 of the Subdivision Map Act as follows: LIST OF CORRECTIONS SHEET 4 OF 6 SHEETS ♦ Set a 2" x 24" iron pipe with disc stamped "L.S. 6215" at the northeast subdivislon boundary comer on the centerline of Quail Gardens Drive. ♦ Found a lead and disc stamped "RCE 23956" at a 9.45 -foot offset in the curb measured at right angles to the westerly right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive in lieu of a lead and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" to be set at an offset of 9.75 feet at the most northeasterly corner cf Lot 19 on the northerly subdivision boundary and the right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. • Found a lead and disc stamped "RCE 23956" at a 9.75 -foot offset in the curb in lieu of a lead and disc stamped "LS. 6215" to be set at the southerly terminus of Curve Delta 18 °12'006, radius 586.00 and length 186.14 feet on the westerly right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. ♦ Unless otherwise listed set a nail and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" on top of wall or pilaster at all rear lot comers in lieu of a 112" x 18" rebar with aluminum cap as shown on Sheet 4 ♦ Set a 1/2" x 18" rebar and aluminum cap marked "L.S. 6215" per record at the southwesterly corner of Lot 7 ♦ Set a 112" x 18" rebar and aluminum cap marked °L. S. 6215" at a 2.00 -foot offset in lieu of a 1/2" x 18° rebar and aluminum cap set at the actual location at the following locations' • At the rear corner common to Lot 8, Lot 17 and Lot 19 being the northerly terminus of course bearing North 04 °20'00" West, 144.96 feet. Said 2.00 -foot offset bears u,ectPrly nt r aht anales to said course. V020'd 00SV 8SS 81'8 IS S31dl30SS1J 2 d3AUSNOH 62 :01 Z171OZ- BT -d3S CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION CITY OF ENCINITAS • At the backline angle point in Lot 10 being the northeasterly terminus of course bearing North 56 008'15" East, 29.16 feet. Said 2.00 -foot offset bears northwesterly at right angles to said course. • At the back line angle point in Lot 11 being the northeasterly terminus of course bearing North 63 600'00" East, 51.00 feet. Said 2.00 -foot offset bears northwesterly at right angles to said course. SHEET 5 OF 6 SHEETS ♦ Set a nail and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" on top of a pilaster in lieu of a 1/2" x 18" rebar with aluminum cap at the following locations: • At the rear corner common to Lots 14 and 15. At the point of curviture on the rear line of Lot 15 being the northerly terminus of course bearing North 00 °17'00" West, 133.01 feet. • At the rear comer common to Lots 15 and 16. • Set a lead and disc stamped "L.S. 6215" in the curb at a 9.65 -foot offset in lieu of a 9 75 -foot offset at the southeast corner of Lot 1 along the westerly right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. • Set a 2" x 24" iron pipe with disc stamped "L.S. 6215" at the most easterly southeasterly subdivision boundary corner on the centerline of Quail Gardens Drive. ♦ The northerly curve return at Quail Gardens Drive and Lauren Court shown as Curve Data C3 at the northeasterly terminus was set at a 8.65 -foot offset in the curb measured on a radial line South 68 °45'16" East in lieu of a 9.75 -foot offset at right angles to the right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. • The southerly curve return at Quail Gardens Drive and Lauren Court shown as Curve Data C4 at the southeasterly terminus was set at a 0.50 -foot offset in the curb measured on a radial line North 42 °24'06" East, in lieu of a 9.75 -foot offset at right angles to the right -of -way of Quail Gardens Drive. h0%'t7'd 00Sb 855 SS8 QS S31CIDOSSC 2 a3AUSNnH 62:0L Z00Z- 81 -d3S 70'd 1ti101 CERTIFICATE Of CORRECTION CITY OF ENCINITAS CERTIFICATE OF ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR I certify that the following are the names of all the present fee owners of real property affected by such corrections: No. Owner Address 1 Barratt American Inc. 5950 pnestley Dnve . Carlsbad, CA 92008 __ [ further certify that the above Certificate of Correction was prepared by or under the direction and control of the undersigned registered civil engineer or licensed surveyor. �AND 8 8 2 -c2 J102 ° LS6Dana Michael Seguin L.S. 6215 Exp 3/3 Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. SG Mm m =� i M4C 4M I, City Engineer of the City of Encinitas. State of California, certify that I have examined the foregoing Certificate of Correction and find that the only changes shown hereon are changes provided for by Section 65469 of the Subdivision Map Act Leroy C. Sodas R.0 E. 22312 Exp. 9130/05 [or] For City Engineer' Deputy: Name, Title RCE of 2z3/2 Exp DATE: g �� 170 %b0'6 00SV 855 858 QS S31dIDOSSd 8 a3NHSNr1H 07:0T Z0017- eT -d3s. 08/01/02 14:40 V700 929 8429 BARRATT AMERICAN 2002 B A R R A T T MEMORANDUM TO: Quail II Residents FROM: Barratt American Inc. DATE: August 1, 2002 RE: Repairs and Street Sealing REVISED NOTICE On Monday, August 5"' Barratt American's subcontractor will be performing miscellaneous asphalt repairs in preparation for seal coating of the streets. On Tuesday, August 6"', the subcontractor will be seal coating the existing street in the project. Our subcontract will supply supervision for the limited access available on these two days. No parking will be allowed on streets during this same time frame between 7:30 a.m, and 5:00 p.m. We are also requesting that you turn off your irrigation systems on these two days. It will be necessary for us to tow any vehicles (at the owners expense) that are in the way of the asphalt work. So please be sure to park your car OUTSIDE of the construction area. If weather /rain prevents work on these days, you will be notified of the revised overlay dates. We would like to apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you, and we appreciate your cooperation with this schedule. • r Daniel R. Sanchez B A R R A T T i ?,RR {'• +,11ei0.:.{SIN,1�RIt ?F.inL` rC�a a:, '(,1! a'P'w.��PVrPli�omo -a•s+ cep• (,c' K44• twill D LOIS HUMPHREYS Reudmi Januay 10, 2000 DAVID KUL(HIN Dmw Mr Jim Noulton EUsINE SULLIVAN 505 S. Vulcan Ave. On.IE, Encinitas, Calif. 92024 -3633 IUDiHANSON D'.wr ALLAN IULIUSSEN 0 ".w, Subject: Quail Gardens, Lower Mesa, Sewer Release for Paving. MI(HAEL J. BARDIN ueo.cl wmop. Dear Jim, All of the required testing which also includes CCTV inspection for the sewer at the Lower NIrsa project has been completed. The service laterals have been installed as per the plans and specifications and are acceptable for use. Permits are also on file. The owner Barrett American is responsible for the maintenance and any emergencies, such as stoppages, trench settlement, etc. This is not a letter of acceptance for the entire project, only a release for paving. If you have any questions or need further assistance, feel free to call me at 753 -0155 ext. 300: Fe ours a pector Cc: file Distiia Office: 1960 to Costa Avenue, Carlsbad, (olilornia 92009-6810 • 17601753 -0155 • FAX (760) 753 -3094 Wise an ,"ied popei OL Municipal Water District 1966 olivenhain Road • Ercinitw CA 92024 • Phone (760) M 6306 • FAx (760; . 53 -1575 January 19, 2001 City of Encinitas. Engineering Depe rtment Mike Valdes Public Works Inspector Encinitas CA 92024 Sv' ject: Encinitas Fanch North Lower Mesa Paving Lauren C,�urt o whom 1 h'ay Concern: Thu Dllverhair Municipal Water District ( "District ") has received a «:quest from Barrat -+-r =r,.--an I )coiporated, for the app,oval of paving Lauren Court. Tr is lettir is to acknowledge that the waterline passed both the Hydrostatic and Bacti '9st to W2 Ustrict's satisfactinn. The District does not object to the owner paving over he portlt 1 0' waterline withir Lauren Court. I! you ha%a a1 y questions, please contact the undersigned. OLIVENNAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT C. Wayne Alexander Se,,ior Inspecl-)r Board of Virector> A" L fogy, Pesdm: .Yaro6{ L Gano. Vet Pf.. Ilea rAeb, a rt Afe,k+; rrmsu., 34w" J. Varty; DGrcnr Rr Brri F 7riW��v.t,:. D!rare iJ'd General Manager DaveJ C .'t(eCollo.n egad Counsel laiet 14 ?doer J IC. ,;L (.F[ 3�,St <5 - QJ�, -i: <ej A public agcnry proud!,- sery ;ng nrtions of Leuca, t" Cardtjf, 5 'ana Bead. Rartc.So Saxta Ft. gt,in;tas. Carisbad, Sa-s Die ;c and the 'Jlivenham 1'atle 11 =J N1tHU3 )I Enclnlhu Ranch Community Association 9610 Weples Street (dSdJ $50.790tl San Diego, CA 92121 -2992 (M) SSOL7601 WWW.NN! COM FAX (858) $50.7929 October 3, 1002 Joshua Fink Barran American yomes 5950 Priestly Dr. Carlsbad CA. 92009 RE: Turnover of Hardicape al Quail Ridge II (afar Quail Hollow) Dear Mr, Fink., I write to you on behalf of the Board ofblrectors for Encinitas Ranch Communfly Associatlon, This Is to confirm the acceptance by the Association of the hardswPe components of Quail H0110w including the concrete swoles, drains, sidewalks, asphalt streets and stamped concrete Per ore flea[ walls Armhgh inspection completed on Friday, September 27, 2002 attended by yourself Heather eCamps-Collins, Homeowner1BoardMember, Mike Vanes, Consulmnt representing the City ofEncinlias, and myself (Brad Miller Management Representative nfN,N. Jaeschke, Inc.) As was indicated, Barran American will continue to monitor the stamped concrete at the entry to the community due to cracking which is taking place but which was deemed acceptable heearrse at the time of the final walk through inspection It is the Association's understanding that the warranty on these items will remain effect for the nevi 12 months. In addition, per the recommendation of Mike Valle,, managernent for the Association has calendared are Inspection for early next September 2003 to review the accepted areas, Please forward this letter onto City officials and arty other lrxiivia}tal or organization which may be an Interested party. Sincerely, r ;41 of BradMhller, PtopertyMmroger For the Board of Directvr5 Cc: Board of Directors Meke Vanes, Consultant for the City ofFiretrrhas _ Tii•d 66b'ON 3)M753vr NJ L eecd :ON; V02420r403M <- :wv La:e Z/z a6ed`SlL #�31S1`•WVlO Ol N /E010l !USStFL09Ll WUt,z:8 awz,E 'IX LO /C !OL :00ATODOU ONI V0I3I3Vd030 :Aq }ueg GEOPACIFICA, INC. FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: j 1'r 1 KPI F RON: n a coM9ANr L-,4 yr �/�� y DA a� FAX NUMBIL J( TOTAL NO, OF AG851N NG COYR]L JV� _� �� PHONE NUMB ' ,6 3 3 JENDER" Rrj -zRr m HONE al 760 - 721 -UU RS ' .^ 'fO .- �}� �! YOUR REMPENCE PAZ 9, 760 -721 -5539 ,Y ❑ URGIINT 0 P0R XWVTKW ❑ PLPAsu couwamT ❑ PLidAI, REPLY ❑ PLR An RECYCLu 740TE5/COM74E m rOL 1 �� �d t e CL- 1<Q` c Ij c� 1 3060 1NDUSTRT STIEET, SUfTE 105 OCFAN61D%. CA 92054 -4659 760. 721 -5466 / PAX 760- 721 -5539 GIOZCC909LL :1V SVIINION3- DNIW33NIDJ 3 :01 Z/L �6gd SLLq 7sI `•WV L010L ZO /EO /OL !6C99LZL09LL ONI VOIdI3Vd030 : q 1ue8 r : City Of Encinitas May 17, 2002 Sue Button San Diego Gas & Electric Company P.O. Box 1831 San Diego, CA 92112 &0MCsd- RE: Street Light Energizing Lower North Mesa, 6"7II Dear Sue: The Two (2) street lights (100 W H.P.S., 120 Volt) on the attached plan have been installed and inspected. The City of Encinitas hereby requests the lights shown on the attached plan be energized and placed on the City's LS2 list at your earliest convenience. Enclosed is a copy of the street light "as- built" drawing. Sincerely, Greg S Ads, P.E. Field erations cc: Mike Valles, Inspector Andy Bullington, Street Dept. Southwest Signal Service TFL 7W4)33 -2lp10 FAX-W-633.262- 5'1i ,N, %ulcan Avenue. F.nciniu, 1.I ilwnln 7202 +3633 TDD'(a)- 633 -2700 ✓ � recycled paper If 1 /�1e✓K.,.. �vo�'h sri L�SNtviG ,nL I I �\ • I N N � 1 I P I X11\ I1 I III I 1 _a a r I I I 1 I v 1 a I I I I I I I 7 N N �m T \\ y+ = k �N J r yT `N 111 - - -III I _ `� a•� ��' (IV YN IY 1 1 • 1 ♦ I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I ' 1 1 1 1 I / E,:cl l,rws QA>J,4 nore,ra „hen — ��ih L;�n +S olxE ! of w sri W5 x" Jv f (3q�ZZ.4rT — Pda� li = � 3 '' /Z L�'c,vl cr U.�_ t�.,l �ir%c�,C �� M1° •.?°� � o Q If 1 /�1e✓K.,.. �vo�'h sri L�SNtviG ,nL I I �\ • I N N � 1 I P I X11\ I1 I III I 1 _a a r I I I 1 I v 1 a I I I I I I I 7 N N �m T \\ y+ = k �N J r yT `N 111 - - -III I _ `� a•� ��' (IV YN IY 1 1 • 1 ♦ I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I ' 1 1 1 1 I / i\tGIrJ 11195 IZ�y.u41 rJvti714 ImG—SA 13o'Il� L��n +S Ano-I 1 2.&.) Ju,✓r- pC>t to+t,: Aywi C"L-'Z2 "-/ g r4-r se-"- -FO Pic- "'1 2f£ !J i m%,j dc, , �• ,vlu , c�,C.,v1 c V L4-c — R.J I PO x �w 4A- no by f4%ce�S�., ✓c /h Gri L, s�if „C ,v, L. _ 4; 0 -3 7 A-0- Z �° x'00 c}�Z = . I '• 1 A 1 Nd m \ O W \ pN G s A `1 O I I N \ I � V • N N I I I - -- 1 Ul 1 1 11 s co W W a L A O I O 'o / I UI�V. D C 4ARM r D�a ZNN 1 11 11 ` I N i lU W I V K I U IY N o ' I W In I � � W W N N w 1,FM N ti X A W a ru xu Y Y ZNN tl rNN 4 .o a L�l to Om -1 Q� ru dc Li to I pU N 1 1 N � N A (J P i,i 1 1 1 �JAI oR JJ 1 1 / 1 — \ ,G Y .o a L�l to Om -1 Q� ru dc Li to I pU N 1 1 N � N A (J P i,i 1 1 1 �JAI oR JJ B A R R A T T November 1. 2001 Mr. Greg Shields Senior Civil Engineer CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 RE: North Mesa Lower Quail Ridge ii Tract 98 -171 Bond Release Request Dear Mr. Shields: 6.� 11-07-6,f 4 -VC) dCGS Zi ,KGs 3 — 51C40k5. We- SNoucr.V 11!77A/46- ov7- T,s t/i��T. L-� rs W-41 7- 9011- 4J'00c..n Yor> ALEASi- 6104 &a- To Tr rf '7 —tc L Barratt American Incorporated has completed improvements on the Quail Ridge II project and is hereby requesting release of the following bonds. Grading Cash Bond #6038GI $ 79,944 Monumentation Bond 111 3351 2514 $ 4,000 Improvement Grading Bond 111 3351 2506 $411,064 I would appreciate it if you would let me know if there are any further items needed in order to release these agreements and bonds. Please feel free to give us a call if you have any questions concerning this request. Sincerely, Barratt American Incorporated Patricia L. Bevil Planning & Engineering Administration Manager cc: Richard Sanchez P BaMWw"O SP GkQw! RW90Q2 Sod RY Rqu tl Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte Del Nogal, Suite 160, Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 431 -0800 • www.barraithomes.com Contractor's License No. 407512 FAX TRANSMITTAL FORM T . v men /e,211 'ioi a COMPANY NAME. :all ASAP lease Handle # OF PAGES (includinguns paged PHONE. 760/633- & Call ❑ Review & Return ❑ F.Y I. ❑ per Our Conversation ❑ Please Reply by COMMENTS: >D�Y p7. Greg Melds - accessquai n ge. oc age 1 February 7, 2001 Barratt American Inc. Bruce A_ Mezan, Project Manager 2035 Corte Del Nogal, Suite #160 Carlsbad, CA 92009 RE: Quail Ridge Lower N. Mesa Stop Work Order Dear Mr. Mezan: This letter will serve as formal notice and confirmation of the items discussed in our meeting of February 5, 2001. The major theme of the meeting centered on maintaining an unobstructed fire access width throughout construction. The City established the minimum width for two -way traffic at the subject location to be 24 feet, or 12 feet in each direction at the entry. The following are conditions under which the stop work order will be lifted. 1. The City of Encinitas and Encinitas Fire Department understand that at some point final surfacing of the entryway will cause narrowing. It is the City's policy that life safety not be compromised. Should it become necessary to reduce portions of the road to less than 24 feet, all work in the project, including sales, shall cease until the 24 feet is restored (other than the actual work necessary to complete the entry). 2. Barratt may elect to construct the entryway by removing the island first, maintaining a minimum of 24 feet at all times. In this case, work in the project may continue. 3. Inside the project and at all times during construction, a minimum of 24 feet shall be maintained. Double parked vehicles, work bins, lumber, dirt piles, tool sheds, or any other obstructions to the 24 foot width will result in delay of inspections, stop work orders or possibly a citation being issued. 4. Before final occupancy release of the last dwelling unit, the final lift of asphalt, all hydrant reflectors, address numbers, or other conditions of permit shall be completed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at (760) 633 -2823. Sincerely, Michael Castaneda Deputy Fire Marshal Greg Shields - accessquai ri ge. oc age 2 Mike Valles - e: Quail Gardens Drive - Barrett damage to parkway and median page 1 From: Mike Wells To: Mike Valles Date: 114/01 3 08P Subject: Re: Quail Gardens Drive - Barrett damage to parkway and median Thank you. >>> Mike Valles 01104/01 11 32A >>> Roger -over! I left word with both Hazard and Barratt that they are to notify me inadvance so that you can come out and meet with us on repairs. mikev.com >>> Mike Wells 01/04/01 08:50AM >>> Mike: The landscaping and irrigation on Quail Gardens Drive adjacent to the Barrett North Mesa project was damage first by equipment xing during grading, then the median was dug up at a water main (and may have undermined the street). Per meeting this morning with Greg Shields, I understand that Hazard has directed ECI to make repairs. I would appreciate if you could keep me informed when you see any action on this. Thanks. Mike Mike Wells Parks Supervisor City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 760 633 -2747 mwel Is(cDci. encin itas. ca. us ❑Weighed at 1508 W. Mission Road Escondido, CA 92029 ESCONDIDO READY MIX CONCRETE DELIVERY TICKET A DIVISION OF SUPERIOR READY MIX CONCRETE, L.P. 529665 1508 W. MISSION ROAD a ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92029 WEIGHMASTER CERTIFICATE PHONE: (760) 745 -0556 a (760) 727 -1733 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that line following described commodity was weighed measured, or counted by a we,ghmesler, whose signature is on this certificate who is a recogn12ed Sunnily Of accurac, sa n/. Weighed at prescribed by Chapter ] (commencing with section 12)00) of 1„{Q 3227 Oceanside Blvd. Division 5 of me California Btisineus and Profesiona Code. administered by Ire Division of Measurement Standards of the Oceanside, CA 92054 California Depailmem of Food and Agriculture DATE CUSTOMER NO ORDER NO e 0 ❑Weighed at 1508 W. Mission Road Escondido, CA 92029 ESCONDIDO READY MIX CONCRETE DELIVERY TICKET A DIVISION OF SUPERIOR READY MIX CONCRETE, L.P. 529665 1508 W. MISSION ROAD a ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92029 WEIGHMASTER CERTIFICATE PHONE: (760) 745 -0556 a (760) 727 -1733 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that line following described commodity was weighed measured, or counted by a we,ghmesler, whose signature is on this certificate who is a recogn12ed Sunnily Of accurac, sa n/. Weighed at prescribed by Chapter ] (commencing with section 12)00) of 1„{Q 3227 Oceanside Blvd. Division 5 of me California Btisineus and Profesiona Code. administered by Ire Division of Measurement Standards of the Oceanside, CA 92054 California Depailmem of Food and Agriculture DATE CUSTOMER NO ORDER NO CUSTOMER PO OR JOB N PLANT NO DEUVERYTIC1 NO. INeHkhl_. t CUSTOMER "ME SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS - a]N[:khTk: ORB MACHINE JOB ADD .l f( DESIGN IN ROCK (LBS) ff ROCK (LBS ) LBS SAND LBS. CEMENT SACK WATER ADO MIX (LBS.) SUPERIOR READY MIX CONGF�ETE, L.P WEIGHMASTER - TRUCK DRIVER CUBIC YARDS TOTX C Y DESCRIPTION PRODUCT CODE UNIT PRICE TAX AMOUNT LCURBJ (W. YARDS TO GO In the event of delivery beyond curb line. this company will not assume liability for damage to sidewalk, driveway. utility lines. TOTAL THIS ORDER maters, septic systems, or any other property. Materials hereby sold become property of purchaser at point of origin. The purchaser shall in no event accept deliveries of materials not in accord with the agreement of the parties, but such materials STAND -BY TIME THIS TICKET PREVIOUS STANDBY shall be refused by the purchaser and returned to the seller with a written statement of the reason for the refusal thereof. No cancellation accepted after concrete has been loaded in carrier's trucks at our plant. Customer is to provide for and assume • • responsibility lot area or container for clean out of concrete truck chute. Any discharge to watercourses. street gutters or stormdrains Is a violation of law. Concrete is a structural building material warranteed only to meet ASTM standards. Soma imperfections and popouts may occur for which Supplier is not responsible. PLANT OUT UNUSUAL INCIDENT OF NOTE ON THIS DELIVERY MAXIMUM AfCEIVED IN GOOD CONDITION BY SLUMP l IN X • WATER ADDED AT CUSTOMER S \ CUSTOMER SIGNATURE CAUTION' Cement powder orVrashly mixed concrete. grout or mortar may cause shin injury Avoid REOUEST GALLONS ON JOB UNLOAD!!t,,.•i contact with shin and wash exposed akin areas promptly with water If any cement powder or mixture • ESTIMATEDSLUMP AT UNLOADING DEPART START I"/ yhfLj -y gels Into the eyes rinse immediately and mpeetedly with water and get prompt medical attention Keen children away from cement powder and all freshly ri cement products I ^ ANY WATER ADDED TO MIX ON THE JOB WILL BE AT THE PURCHASER'S RISK INCHES ARRIVAL e/ FINISH NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ULTIMATE DUALITY OF CONCRETE IF ANY INGREDIENTS ARE ADDED s WAITING AND /OR UNLOADING AFTER LEAVING PLANT READY Slitndby anN« dumping timem excess Of a ftMft tear yard will be charged. TIME HOUR TO UNLOAD CUSTOMER B A R R A T T December 14, 2000 Mike Valles Public Works Inspector City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 RE: Quail — 16 Lots Dear Mike: Per our conversation, I would like to let you know that Schilling's crew will be working on our project Saturday, December 16, 2000. Work to be done is pipelaying, so the only equipment that will be operated will be a back -hoe, which should generate a limited amount of noise. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED Daniel R. Sanchez General Offsite Construction Manager Cc: Jim Knolton P'. kpbe llCorrespondenceacwd SanchimlQuail - Mike Vallex (Samrdry Work). doc Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte Del Nogal, Suite 160, Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 431 -0800 Contractor's License No. 407512 10- 26- 00:06:37AM:BARRATT AMERICAN B A R R A T T VIA FACSIMILE: (760) 633 -2627 October 17, 2000 Ms. Carla Kay Engineering Inspector City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: Damaged Irrigation North Mesa Lower (Quail — 16) Dear Ms. Kay: :160 9296433 / ' tl As confirmation of our conversation today regarding damaged irrigation and landscaping above referenced site. It is Barrett American's understanding that our contractor damaged the irrigation system at two different locations, one at the jobs north boundary and the second at the future entry to the site. Please accept this letter as Barratt's acknowledgment that the City of Encinitas will make the necessary repairs to these areas at their discretion and invoice Barrett American Incorporated for said costs. The damaged area on north boundary can be repaired as of this date. The second area should be repaired prior to our street construction, which commences on December 0 and is scheduled for completion on January 5, 2001. Please feel free to give me a call if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED L,e L—Z-� Daniel R. Sanchez General Offsite Construction Manager plot. is wKhid Sind+ \Q.&* M of Eri«h. Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte Del Nogal, Suite 160, Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 431 -0800 Contractor's License No. 407512 Y 1 / 1 E2 EG1 3785 All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of building/grading permit issuance shall apply. Grading Conditions EG2 No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the final map unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In waiving this condition, the City Engineer shall consider the existing grading on the site under Grading Permit 4457G together with the need for erosion control and necessary improvements. EG3 The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. EG4 The grading for this project is defined in Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to the Engineering Services Director and verify compliance with Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. EG5 No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. EG7 Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, all newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1. EG8 A soils/geological/hydraulicreport (as applicable) shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to perform such work: Such report shall be submitted and approved: Prior to final map approval. G10 In accordance with Section 23.24.370 (A) of the Municipal Code, no grading permit shall be issued for work occurring between October 1 st of any year and April 15th of the following year, unless the plans for such work include details of protective measures, including desilting basins or other temporary drainage or control measures, or both, as may be deemed necessary by the field inspector to protect the adjoining public and private property from damage by erosion, flooding, or the deposition of mud or debris which may originate from the site or result from such grading operations. ED1 DrainaeeConditions ED2 The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and shall construct temporary desiltation/detention basins of type, size cd/DL/RPC98171.907 (2/2/99 - Final)29 3786 and location as approved by the Engineering Services Director. The basins and erosion control measures shall be shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or approved by the Engineering Services Director. The developer shall maintain the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a period of time satisfactory to the Engineering Services Director and shall guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the Engineering Services Director. ED3 A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water originating within the subdivision, and all surface waters that may flow onto the subdivision from adjacent lands, shall be required. Said drainage system shall include any easements and structures as required by the Engineering Services Director to properly handle the drainage. ED5 The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the final map for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan and City of Encinitas Standards as required by the Engineering Services Director. ED7 Concentrated flows across driveways and/or sidewalks shall not be permitted. ED8 The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from a 100 - year frequency storm under developed conditions is equal to or less than the runoff from a storm of the same frequency and duration under existing conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results. ES 1 Street Conditions ES3 The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the Tentative Map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the Final Map for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. ES4 Reciprocal access and/or maintenance agreements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives or parking areas and maintenance thereof to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director. cd/DL/PPC98171.907 (212/99 - Final)30 Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. Planning•Engineering - Surveying David Hammar Jack Hill David Davis CERTIFICATION FIELD MEMO DATE: / — /B - 'P/ ATTN: REFERENCE Tract No PROJECT: Address Permit No. , Grading Inspector 9B - l71 /Uok iH 41Ea,4 LowE 2 The above mentioned project has been checked and found to be completed substantially in conformance with the approved iMPkbVE_MEN i plan, for the area described below. i E] Rough o Precise Line & Grade Grade Grade DESCRIPTION: Su3 gk 4DE �2N Z4URFJ.1 eousi! LES1s7- ✓o" t3f/ow Fiv�sv Su Hunsaker S Ass9fiates San Diego, Inc. By: Signatu e /�Rk�'Y CyiEF' Title Lae] 10179 Huennekens St., Suite 200 • San Diego, CA 92121 • (619) 535-2150 RA39 �Geotec 'nics Incorporated 9245 Activity Rd., Suite 103 San Diego, CA 92126-0442 Phone(858)536 -1000 Fax (858) 536 -8311 DAILY REPORT OF GRADING OBSERVATION DATE 111.2iol I JDAY 749-01 PAGE 1 OF I PROJECT 9 --A L tR CLIENT �; ^RR AT I^JMC� PROJECT NO. jqSi7 -oD3 - a 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR LOCATION A L GRADING CONTRACTOR PROJECTMANAGER D Zo$ w � WEATHER -4 u ti PROJECT ENGINEER A- T S DAY'S APPROX. YARDAGE VISITORS SITECONDITIONS DQ SOURCE AND CLASSIFICATION OF FILL MATERIAL CL w ii EQUIPMENT USED IN OPERATION HOURS APPROVED BY TECHNICIAN TIME AT JOB NUMBER OF TEST fNl OFF CHARGE PASSING FAILING Gef V Ll 4 v• lt7JD r spJ ?- SPECIFIC LOCATION OF WORK PERFORMED a4LQSs (o' u.!:R Ck AAC 19Aj 16AL. [4,t - S _ &4&W MkZb1c1.* _ -mow„ - -- " pf= SUMMARYOF013SERVATIONS &V S - YIS oATC K-dIL t92Ss-R.✓gfl J,r AG.�+n wTtA BASE NAO AI.IK VLiv9M1� APPLtt• (' Xfrl.0"%. a.1TES- pAOV-' h 4 n O /� u 1 c 101 w. 2 A R /7 +-✓.tT t^1.T>• Ali. N 1up1 T LT/JN 4s la �tt�a Tlw A6 titl1 ETC» a V ' 6,*otii 'r S -ob-¢. A-'Q SCWW -AKtxn O.e -ar- 71.e,bA1Z4rt0.t, AWWI T R-OAO I-W 71.OLC A-f7a1s T11t -..e, AREAS NE ,PD!M R nNq@WRKING _ i' i _ DAY OF GRADING engineering Ole. white copy ton supenntenaent. yellow copy new me pinrc copy Z �1 * L - B A R R A T T January 26, 2001 Jim Knolton City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 RE: Quail Ridge, TM 9 8-171 Lots f through 16 Dear Jim: Barratt American would like to request releases on lots 1 and 16. The pad certification letter for lots 1 through 16 and the As- Graded Geotechnical Report on North Mesa -Lower were previously submitted. Enclosed, you will find the Olivenhain Municipal Water District for the paving approval letter, Geotechnics Incorporated grading observation report, Leucadia County Water District sewer release letter, and Hunsaker & Associates Wall Certification letters. Please feel free to contact me if you need any further information. Thank you in advance for your attention to this request. Sincerely, BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED Daniel R. Sanchez General Offsite Construction Manager Cc: Mike Valles, Engineering Inspector v vacn.b s. w - A. KnORM (F ..V Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte Del Nogal, Suite 160, Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760)431.0800 Contractor's License No. 407512 OLIV NUMN Municipal Water District 1966 Olivenhain Road • Encinitas, CA 92024 • Phone(760)753 -6466 • Fax(760)753 -1578 January 19, 2001 City of Encinitas, Engineering Department Mike Valles Public Works Inspector Encinitas, CA 92024 Subject: Encinitas Ranch North Lower Mesa Paving Lauren Court To Whom It May Concern: The Olivenhain Municipal Water District ( "District ") has received a request from Barrat American Incorporated, for the approval of paving Lauren Court. This letter is to acknowledge that the waterline passed both the Hydrostatic and Bacti test to the District's satisfaction. The District does not object to the owner paving over the portion of waterline within Lauren Court. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT C , C. Wayne Alexander Senior Inspector Board of Directors Ann L Peav President Harold L Gano, Vice President Thelma M. Miller, Treasurer Susan J. Vany, Director Robert F. Topolovac, Director General Manager David C McColloni Legal Counsel Wesley W. Peltzer A public agency proudly serving portions of Leucadia, Cardiff, Solana Beach, Rancho Santa Fe, Encinitas, Carlsbad, San Diego and the Olivenhain Valley. PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING IRVINE RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO DAVE HAMMAR LEx WILLIMAN ALISA VIALPANDO DANA SEGUIN 10179 Huennekens St. San Diego, CA 92121 18581558 -4500 PH (858) 558 -1414 F x w .HunsakerSD.tom Info ®Hunsakei-SD.Com HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES A N D I E G O. 1 N C. July 10, 2001 City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Finish Grade Certification TM No.: 98 -171 Project: North Mesa Lots: 1 and 2 ` JUL '72001 The grading for the above referenced lots has been completed in conformance with the approved precise grading plan, including the location and inclination of all manufactured slopes, pad elevations, and construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage. Daniel P. Smith L.S. 6854 Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. r LAN D E� y p P .D L. S. 6854 L _ \Exp. 9/30/04) j va s,,, x 02v 210i' uaz ,loc wa G29�i36 City of Encinitas North Mesa July 10, 2001 Page 2 Lot No Pad Elevation As -Built 321.6 321.6 2 319.2 319.2 scamkwzw�1i 2a w.o. Oi 131 Aim, Geotechnics Incorporated Principals: Anthony F. Belfast Michael P. Imbriglio 11 , W. Lee Vanderhurst December 27, 2000 Barratt American Incorporated �J Project No. 0517 - 003 -01 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 1 11 Document No. 0 -1348 Carlsbad, California 92009 1 Attention: Mr. Richard Sanchez SUBJECT: R -VALUE TEST RESULTS AND PAVEMENT SECTION RECOMMENDATIONS North Mesa -Lower Encinitas, California References: Portland Cement Association, 1984, Thickness Design for Concrete Highway and Street Pavements. Gentlemen: As requested, we have collected samples of the subgrade soil along the alignment of Lauren Court in the North Mesa Lower development for R -value testing. The samples were collected on December 21, 2000. The test results are attached. A summary of the results is as follows: SAMPLE NO. SAMPLE LOCATION I REPRESENTING R -VALUE R -1 Station No. 12 +00 Station Nos. 10+35 to 13 +50 40 R -2 Station No. 14 +50 Station Nos. 13 +50 to 15 +90 end 45 Based on the R- values presented herein, and a traffic index of 5 as provided by the City of Encinitas, the City of Encinitas' minimum section for flexible pavement is recommended. The section consists of 4 inches of asphalt concrete over 6 inches of aggregate base. Asphalt concrete should conform to Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (SSPWC), Section 203 -6, for Type III 9245 Activity Rd., Ste. 103 • San Diego, California 92126 Phone (858) 536.1000 • Fax (858) 536 -8311 BARRATT AMERICAN INCORPORATED PROJECT NO. 0517-003-01 DECEMBER 27, 2000 DOCUMENT NO. 0 -1098 PAGE NO. 2 AR4000. The aggregate base should conform to SSPWC Section 200 -2 for crushed aggregate base, or Caltrans Class 2 base course. The upper 1 foot of the subgrade and the base course should be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum density as determined by ASTM D1557-91. The asphalt concrete should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction as compared to the Hveem density as determined by Caltrans test method 304. The City of Encinitas' minimum section for PCC -paved street sections is 6 inches of PCC over 6 inches of base. Based on Table II in their design manual, the proposed 6 -inch thick section of concrete over aggregate base should be adequate for the intended traffic on this residential street. The recommendations presented herein are considered generally consistent with methods typically used in southern California, and have been developed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional opinions included in this letter. We appreciate this opportunity to be of professional service. Please call if you should have any questions or require additional information. GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Dick Roberts Project Geologist DR/RAT Robert A. Torres, P.E. 43077 Principal Distribution: (5) Addressee (1) Mr. Jim Knowlton, City of Encinitas Attachments: R -Value Test Results Geotechnics Incorporated �PZ a to cq�\ 00 s � NQ WIJOTi EXP.3.31, crv1>- �F C A. DEC -27 -00 12.23 FROM =SO CAL SOIL TESTING I0:G19280471-, PAGE 10/"4 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. f 5iG 5280 RIVERDALE STREET, P. G. BOX 600627. SAN DIEGO, CA 92160 (619) 280-4321 Job Name: GEOTACHNICS Job No - nn �nas C CAL -TEST 301 '.J AST171 D 2844 - Test Specimen 4 N r n Date Tested,,;- :'ti` a As Tested ,. ,. .,.,,. Compactor Air Pressure PSI 1001 25C 300 Wt. Ret. Initial Moisture % _ 9 1 9 Soil Wt. Added GRAMS 1050 1070 1070 Total + #4 Water Added ML 105 95 87 - �y •IS'i�'%yIF _'+r w ai'::,u'.r r4.' Y.�. !' av:.. M Sail:• : a. i _ : '�' I .:: 9: 100 Weight of Briquette & Tare GRAMS 3229 3275 3264 11 0 — 'L Net Wei ht of Briquette _ _ GRAMS 1144 11581 1145 6 Briquette Height IN 2.52 2.551 2.52 Deral Exudation Pressure PSI 250 335 715 E ton PH_ at 1000 Pounds PSI 46 33 20 PH at 2000 Pounds_ PSI 102 69 35 Displacement Turns 4.20 4.0C 3.80 R VbllRS' 10 3" ��MYr�, Ir. t <• ',d.' t M u . a $tHt71 eieF^. 1't. 61e33i e. Y P..,'. iY � e� I r.ry �-.. •r Expansion Dial Reading A "i�.ARIiJ(iry. .' 11..:.vr^W '•tl.'�'.. .�:�- t•:'1•t..:. 0000 ., it :.I 0000 INi/' y}7�`... _ 0026 .�.. _.. N.'J., r'qy ,: Corrected R -Value ^ T r .:ea 5 4 R -Value bq Exudation Pre Gravel E uivalent 4 Traffic Index aaa3son <S w r TrdA •y . 4.5 4.5 4.5 ' ` (� ,:_': CY•., v. R0. i .�:M •rF .:40� I 5:lP- ,H.i44u. 'I:InLr Xtt 4x:r A 40 R- Value Ex ansicn 8ressure < _ R-Value at Equivalent r.. �.: ..� Grain Size Distribution As Received As Tested Minus #4 Sam Ie Plus #4 Sample Wt. Ret. °'o Re_L_ % Pass Wt. Ret. % Rot % Pass Total Equals_ 17747 Total + #4 1096 -- - — Total -#4 16649 100 3/4 112 535.5 647.5 3 _ -_4 97 _._ -- 96 96 95 99 9' 11 0 — 'L 12 0 318 - #4 759.5 4 1098 6 94 j 24 DEC -27 -00 12-25 PROM.50 CAL SOIL TESTING [0=5192604717 R -value By Exudation Pressure PAGE 11/14 j 100 j — - 90 80 -- 70 60 50 cu i 40 ` 30 20 10 0 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Exudation Pressure (psi) ' Job Name: GEDTACHNICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA B : ORB Date: 12/ vml SOIL AND TESTING, INC. Job No.: 0012045 Sample No.: A -I LAS* 3272 �4 .'7k— R -Value by Ex.: 41 Plat No.: DEC -27 -00 12.25 FROM,60 CAL SOIL TESTING 10,6192804717 I W U. I W w W g I Q F f1) } m 0 cn W Z Y v r=- li W O U EXPANSION PRESSURE CHART 0• __ PAGE 12/14 COVER THICKNESS SY EXPANSION PRESSURE -FEET I E Job Name: _ GEOTACHNICS j SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA By: URB Oate: 12x612000 SOIL AND TESTING, INC- Job No.: 0012045 Sample No.: a -1 UZZ * 32T Grave! Equ: 0.87 Mate No.: .I I l 22 - --` -- -- . -- i � 2 II III II !.I II, ill �I 1 It i iii I , ! II I I I I II I I I W i l l i •. 7.3 �I !III jl 7.2 Iji I ( II 0.9 I, I! II II Ii. Illill it !I 'I ll I II III IIII'I i 0.6 I , I 0.5 i I III i I I t� 0. 3 I _ l . D.2 O.,D II I I i II I Ii I I 0 02 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 l.t 1,8 1,5 2.0 22 24 28 28 3.0 32 3.4 3.8 3.8 4.0- .2 .4 4B 4.2 I COVER THICKNESS SY EXPANSION PRESSURE -FEET I E Job Name: _ GEOTACHNICS j SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA By: URB Oate: 12x612000 SOIL AND TESTING, INC- Job No.: 0012045 Sample No.: a -1 UZZ * 32T Grave! Equ: 0.87 Mate No.: "DEC-27-00 12.26 FFi0M:50 CAL SOIL YESI -i NC 10:6192804717 P +CE 13,14 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. ° j 6280 RIVERDALE STREET, P. 0. BOX 600627, SAN DIEGO, CA 92160 (619) 280 -4321 ,1 . CAL =TEST 301.. ILJ ASTM D 2844' " Test _'oeeimen A R C n Date - asted -,.',� w . :+ .: 2/26420. O:2(26f2 Minus #4 Sam le Plus #4 Sam le Comp ctor Air Pressure PSI 240 110 350 % Pass Initial loisture % 2.2 22 2.2 Soit N_ . Added GRAMS 1050 1020 ! 1050 Water Idded ML 105 113 94 n..•k ;; .. l Water :.^ .r i'.� u�a - ,^ f 7 , Moist,.-e.At:Coir' cboalFasSs �.,1 "Y{T! nl'Iri * -, w� ''1'M•1GJ+I yr•.•v ��9 rr �� !'..t'�.. Weigr- of Briquette & Tare GRAMS 3193 3168 3199 Net W ight of Briquette GRAMS 1144 1122 1136 - �— – Bn qu, :te Hel ht IN 2.56 2.51 2.54 -- - 420, 330 Exud. tion Pressure PSI 190 460 jLxpa. SIOn i?I'e- SSUr$.. -.' 1 .r_ . PH at 1000 Pounds _ +c:_ PSI ''.<;• 33 58 26 _ _ PH at 2000 Pounds PSI 62 117 49 Displacement Turns 4.30 _ 4.501 4.00 LL� •R'.11'alu , . � �. 1 E . ansioA Thiekries;F ;, " Expansion Dial Reading 0000 00001 0000 q' Value: Mod` �1r' fig, ..;`�± r ,h;, . � , t•:' ' "- •,� .' .•3 �.j " , ,. _.g, , .- Q6ESCY6;ti',� ?_..., _ „.rt.�., at'E:il9: .'• �:. O'it;r'1 :.. x - � R- valueb Gravel Equivalonf Traffic Index 4.5 4.5 4.5 Grain Size Distribution As Received As Tested Minus #4 Sam le Plus #4 Sam le Wt. Rot. % Ret. % Pass Wt. Ret. % Ret % Pass Total Equals Total + #4 Total - #4 Sieve i' :; n..•k ;; .. l „.: �,� + :.^ .r i'.� u�a " ,�~ ,;, ,^ f 7 1 1/2 -- — - �— – 100 -- - . ,DEC -27 -00 1228 FROM-SO CAL SOIL TESTING ID.6192904717 R -value By Exudation Pressure FACE 14Z 14 100 6.1 80 li 70 i y I I ' i I I 50 i FACE 14Z 14 100 6.1 80 70 60 50 � I 40 30 20 0 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Exudation Pressure (psi) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ,^ SOIL AND TESTING, INC. .0 rwmc[ GEOT + DRS Date: b No.: 0012045 Sample No.: Value by Ex.: 45 Plate No P,2 LAB N A ni �Geotec C Incorporated 0 9245 Activity Rd, Suite 103 San Diego, CA 921264442 Phone (859) 5341000 Fax (858) 5348311 DAILY REPORT OF GRADING OBSERVATION DATE 117 p 1 = DAY W t: A eA A I PAGE 1 OF PROJECT (V sA L w CLIENT SA"A f 60 611 d L PROJECT NO. 0 C I7 - 00 3 - ✓ 1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR LOCATION t A. a . y, A GRADING CONTRACTOR ''1 A J AILpj PROJECT MANAGER 0, 2L0 p-TS WEATHER 0114 Nti PROJECT ENGINEER Q -<Orw L DAY'S APPROX. YARDAGE VISITORS SITE CONDITIONS 2 SOURCE AND CLASSIFICATION OF FILL MATERIAL rio, EQUIPMENT USED IN OPERATION t X 3 Jw law, 1 '4 1) STvfr nL.ti aq IX 0 wAG 'i tie 13 2c3 rr> 1 7t 124 AL��t: HOURS NUMBER OF TEST APPROVED BY TECHNICIAN TIME AT JOB ON OFF CHARGED F.ra t.,Lt . 4 10T It SPECIFIC LOCATION OF WORK PERFORMED t- �' L trr 1 t'rry, -Q �,p¢_ Srwrk 13ACILFILL_ _ SUMMARY OFOBSERVARONS j2.V 4r7t PHIS awTeFOF 'resrwt. t o St:R..AT•o wa,r;As STR -A A40✓1t.. L 1% S 16,. P111i IN A1A,%4K q LfF 16.61 Imi to I'} ✓j4e� ay IJA� DwAGI t- !. QA6.1Lr-o -L ?-4A% -a FIR#4,4.v0 NNY16'LJl.cf B '(L 10 Stcc 1 ✓ OG .�TtPAV(t ,6 1-oT s-4-. SO t w. t;� •71 Pz TA-0Ir�,O -SOIFT D N r PyW/C IO". 6Pial6E "( zoBr oTrea.lcs, NtS4-ATCP rP.4r W'wr Nii Nt'Cpt '1"0 rlk h0V1e4. 4-+ C.L1r,� SAA4 C.A,+ 13t: ✓ %.C. tJi aALILF/IL- pi -?16'G t..9Ni At- t-O.v AS AO C 7%- •KOISr✓ X6- .b A106 /) Tp AI -•-SOW Sr AT •�(. 9F .aC ANO IVI.N 1�1� ✓01{14 .N '{J�+NGM a PVt 'a Yt.'d CTI Vt C 6f -J ON 5,T&,WrT s.Ag anutc 13DMA& 3w 120 AA 4 3w Z 13 A PcTI✓c L'iG -Vtm t.t n.b P,L G .&- TO G%/1AC. -ZAVAfM AA tNS. yTS wC = TA -.✓ whl H 4S 5 *,Zl 1"E LTIJy S . Lii Ca TICP ily -rr'ST s SAO - " j MAX11') It AVAItd - vA It- �Ao- &7 47 a AT L lI I!.t 6.41 -Vft 70 hDYa60J ?r ✓AI^�b `�uLVG`40RS LtkRtICIC OTrJ AREAS NEEDING RETESTINGIREWORKING DAY OF GRADING 1_ engineering Tile: wmrte copy l loo supermtenoent yenow copy neio rue p.nx wpy eotechnics SAMPLE LOCATION REPRESENTING R -VALUE Incorporated Station No. 15 +10 Station Nos. 13+80 to 15+90 (end) 48 ,�5& ll&t- A�Ae ac.7Z5 c>sfri�i7 - /z -z� 00 October 18, 2000 Barratt American Incorporated 2035 Corte del Nogal, Suite 160 Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Mr. Richard Sanchez SUBJECT: R -VALUE TEST RESULTS AND PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT SECTION RECOMMENDATIONS North Mesa -Lower Encinitas, California Principals: A nthonv F. Belfast Michael P. Imbriglio W. I" Vanderhurst Project No. 0517- 003 -01 Document No. 0 -1098 References: Portland Cement Association, 1984, Thickness Design for Concrete Highway and Street Pavements. Gentlemen: As requested, we have collected samples of the subgrade soil along the alignment of Lauren Court in the North Mesa Lower development for R -value testing. These samples are considered preliminary in that the underground utilities have not yet been installed, and additional testing of the alignment's subgrade should be conducted to verify the conditions indicated herein. The test results are attached as Figures 1.1 through 2.2. A summary of the results is as follows: SAMPLE NO. SAMPLE LOCATION REPRESENTING R -VALUE R -I Station No. 15 +10 Station Nos. 13+80 to 15+90 (end) 48 R -2 Station No. 11 +90 Station Nos. 10 +35 to 13 +75 36 Based on the R -values presented herein, and a traffic index of 5 as provided by the City of Encinitas, the City of Encinitas' minimum section for flexible pavement is recommended. The section consists 9245 Activity Rd., Ste. 103 • San Diego, California 92126 Phone (858) 536.1000 • Fax (858) 536 -8311 Barran American Incorporated Project No. 0517- 003 -01 October 18. 2000 Document No. 0 -1098 Pase 2 of 4 inches of asphalt concrete over 6 inches of aggregate base. Asphalt concrete should conform to Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ( SSPWC), Section 203 -6, for Type III AR4000. The aggregate base should conform to SSPWC Section 200 -2 for crushed aggregate base. or Caltrans Class 2 base course. The upper 1 foot of the subgrade and the base course should be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum density as determined by ASTM D1557 -91. The asphalt concrete should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction as compared to the Hveem density as determined by Caltrans test method 304. The City of Encinitas' minimum section for PCC -paved street sections is 6 inches of PCC over 6 inches of base. Based on Table II in their design manual, the proposed 6 -inch thick section of concrete over aggregate base should be adequate for the intended traffic on this residential street. The recommendations presented herein are considered generally consistent with methods typically used in southern California, and have been developed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional opinions included in this letter. We appreciate this opportunity to be of professional service. Please call if you should have any questions or require additional information. GEOTECHNICS INCORPORATED Dick Roberts Project Geologist Distribution: (5) Addressee e&� T Robert A. Torres, P.E. 43077 Principal Attachments: Figures 1.1 through 2.2, R -Value Test Results Geotechnics Incorporated SAMPLE NO.: R -1 SAMPLE DATE: 10116 /00 SAMPLE LOCATION: Lots 12 & 13, Sta. 15 +10 TEST DATE: 10/17/00 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Brown silty sand (SM) LABORATORY TEST DATA TEST SPECIMEN A COMPACTOR PRESSURE B INITIAL MOISTURE C BATCH SOIL WEIGHT D WATER ADDED E WATER ADDED (D- (100 +B) 1C) F COMPACTION MOISTURE (B +E) G MOLD WEIGHT H TOTAL BRIQUETTE WEIGHT I NET BRIQUETTE WEIGHT (H -G) J BRIQUETTE HEIGHT K DRY DENSITY (30.3'1/((100 +F)'J)) L EXUDATION LOAD M EXUDATION PRESSURE (L112.54) N STABILOMETER AT 1000 LBS O STABILOMETER AT 2000 LBS P DISPLACEMENT FOR 100 PSI Q R VALUE BY STABILOMETER R CORRECTED R -VALUE (See Fig. 14) S EXPANSION DIAL READING T EXPANSION PRESSURE (S- 43,300) U COVER BY STABILOMETER V COVER BY EXPANSION 1 2 3 4 5 70 140 180 5.6 5.6 5.6 1030 1030 1030 80 70 61 8.2 7.2 6.3 13.8 12.8 11.9 2117.8 2115.9 2113.9 3218.0 3210.8 3199.0 1100.2 1094.9 1085.1 2.50 2.47 2.47 117.2 119.1 119.0 2541 4036 6296 203 322 502 52 25 14 114 49 20 5.45 5.27 5.01 16 52 78 16 52 78 0.0002 0.0013 0.0027 9 56 117 1.16 0.66 0.30 0.07 0.43 1 0.90 [PSI] [ %] [G] [ML] [G] [G] [G] [IN] [PCF] [LB] [PSI] [PSI] [PSI] [Turns] [IN] [PSF] [FT] [FT] TRAFFIC INDEX: 6.0 GRAVELFACTOR: 1.39 UNIT WEIGHT OF COVER [PCF]: 130 R -VALUE BY EXUDATION: 48 R -VALUE BY EXPANSION: 59 R -VALUE AT EQUILIBRIUM: 48 'Note: Gravel factor estimated from pavement section in general accordance with CTM 301, Section C, Part b. �G e o t e c h n i c s Project No. 0517- 003 -01 - Incorporated RNALUE TEST RESULTS Document No. 0 -1098 FIGURE 1.1 Sample: R -1, Lots 12 & 13, Sta. 15 +10 R -Value at Equilibrium: 2 0 100 1 8 -- -- _- _ - - _- _ _ _ - 90 1.6 - - - - -- - -- 80 -- 1= 1.4 `w - 70 a E 1.2 - - -- - -- - - -- --- - -- 60 n N M 1.0 - - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - --- - -. _ -- d 50> N N d � C u0.8 -_ - -_. - - -. __— _- ._- _ - _ -- _ 40 _ L i- N 0 0.6 -- - --- — - —. .. - - -- -- - 30 U 04 - — __ _ _ _ ___ _ __ _ -- _ 20 0.2 - - - - - - -- - 10 -- 0.0 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 12 14 1.6 18 2.0 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Cover Thickness by Expansion [FT] Exudation Pressure [psi] + G e o t e c h n i c s Project No. 0517- 003 -01 I n c o rp o r a t e d COVER AND EXUDATION CHARTS Document No. 0 -1098 FIGURE 1.2 SAMPLE NO.: R -2 SAMPLE DATE: 10/16100 SAMPLE LOCATION: Lots 12 & 13, Sta. 11 +90 TEST DATE: 10117/00 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Brown silty sand ISM) LABORATORY TEST DATA TEST SPECIMEN A COMPACTOR PRESSURE B INITIAL MOISTURE C BATCH SOIL WEIGHT D WATER ADDED E WATER ADDED (D'(100 +B) /C) F COMPACTION MOISTURE (B +E) G MOLD WEIGHT H TOTAL BRIQUETTE WEIGHT I NET BRIQUETTE WEIGHT (H -G) J BRIQUETTE HEIGHT K DRY DENSITY (30.3`1 /((100 +F)'J)) L EXUDATION LOAD M EXUDATION PRESSURE (L/12.54) N STABILOMETER AT 1000 LBS O STABILOMETER AT 2000 LBS P DISPLACEMENT FOR 100 PSI Q R VALUE BY STABILOMETER R CORRECTED R -VALUE (See Fig. 14) S EXPANSION DIAL READING T EXPANSION PRESSURE (S'43,300) U COVER BY STABILOMETER V COVER BY EXPANSION 1 2 3 4 5 175 145 65 R -VALUE BY EXUDATION: 7.6 7.6 7.6 63 1025 1025 1035 'Note: Gravel factor estimated from pavement section in general accordance with CTM 301, Section C, Part b. 30 40 50 3.1 4.2 5.2 10.7 11.8 12.8 2112.8 2117.4 2113.0 3165.5 3176.4 3185.4 1052.7 1059.0 1072.4 2.35 2.35 2.39 122.6 122.1 120.5 7575 4147 2947 604 331 235 13 32 34 27 64 80 4.80 5.31 5.26 72 41 32 69 39 30 0.0017 0.0001 0.0000 74 4 0 0.43 0.84 0.97 0.57 0.03 0.00 [PSI] 1 %] [G] [ML] [G] [G] [G] (IN] [PCF] [LB] [PSI] [PSI] [PSI] [Turns] [IN] [PSF] [FT] [FT7 TRAFFIC INDEX: 6.0 GRAVEL FACTOR: 1.39 UNIT WEIGHT OF COVER [PCF]: 130 R -VALUE BY EXUDATION: 36 R -VALUE BY EXPANSION: 63 R -VALUE AT EQUILIBRIUM: 36 'Note: Gravel factor estimated from pavement section in general accordance with CTM 301, Section C, Part b. G e o t e c h n i c s Project No. 0517 -003 -01 _Incorporated RNALUE TEST RESULTS Document No. 0 -1098 FIGURE 2.1 Sample: R -2, Lots 12 & 13, Sta. 11 +90 R -Value at Equilibrium: 36 2 0 100 I 16 — — 80 1.a `m _ -- - - -- - 70 v E 0 1.2 - - - - - - -- -- 60 � rn a 10 - - - - m � 50:W, N m K C u 08 - - - - -- - - - - - 40 L H m 0 0.6 - -- - -. - - - - -- - 30 U 0.4 - - - -- -_. -- _._ __ — - - - 20 0.2 -_ - -_. -- --. - — _ __ _. -_ ---- -_- 10 00 0 00 0.2 0.4 06 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Cover Thickness by Expansion [FT) Exudation Pressure [psi] Geotechnics Project No. 0517 - 003 -01 - COVER AND EXUDATION CHARTS Document No. 0 -1098 Incorporated FIGURE 2.2 I LmoKi. EG= ��l. ngs,a 'oOW -.^ e3.yeearr 05007-k €2QQrI G a�r� egss cr. C�»•co CGS ik �: 7 [l:0a �p•I4� mr 3hol a1. ✓Accts a� /�loRlsr /'l�sa ��-- 13grz�rr 400 LGCKCz So v 774 CY- 1401 5 oA,eZl fiAt YCrs rlo � % bu_ tA4t�5 9 9-0-r 7V C"P*06 1,4rzr r r2eSA comer -- r3a"-,c rr Loo KuCG a(o z"ss M C&L-I>S-- SK c- . rr:oaa•rt'- oi�t -or i- c.J,�,c�s .p �-*10. ..: _:z" A(OtLrrs f )esk L0�+9e-x_ - h�►z�r; r Loogzw6, c.�eYST- ONGY Ercr�2Ye !S SoaYrF �/L LAJ2ES[ �=z. R -C. L'wtceT /l.mo 4 -x' ®1- 31-01 rLL)4c4as os =riot �z.s-s.� Lo..�: c3sfrewrr LAUeE.s cr, LDo�c...rG Gfrsr �ro Q.Cvoarza r!o¢rH V, ro as Pov,�o - -404aa !t [ V - LoLoff ll:co a.11 of -sl -ol r7,VA�e+ �. e +•I�� ;$ C :• � � �r /J, / i�,i /f //f .- . .� -- Y �R .,. ,- f •f µ,ti's �4, m —Ano PERIMETER WALL NOTE ge-AN WOOD FENCE ............... T-PAI-1 . . ...... ...... r�NGEK�X�BA ,gVLIIERA LOT" PROGUITION 3 HIGH TBIBLE1 BRICK PILISTER 1 T..�G HIGH TIRELEI BRICK PILAR- ... BE PC...-'.. PlIA-D HEDGE -1-1 GO KGRE.B.- GHB-D HOA TO MAIITAIN ENTRI .0R.MRllAH.R ==7 L QUAIL GARDENS DRIVE .. BIANT&DED SOUTHERN ENTRY SCALE: I ", =1' -0" Cy T,, T:,. I PROJECT SIGNAGE