The URL can be used to link to this page

2000-6808 GINEERING SERVICES INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM T Copitol Improvement Prof ecil DisMcl Suppon Services Fleia Operarl j Suedlvision EngL e"nng TrafRC Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) - Traffic Engineering (TE) C] District Support Services (_D) C] Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T ��ommunity Development- Current Plannin¢ �( �- + !' O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION:'p San Dieguito Water District- Encineerine & Planning Community Services- Parks &,Beaches DATE: _ )Z c3p Regarding (Finance Number - GgEPOS170ji) TPM/•IM/MUP/MIN/DR: (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE - AtZkiin oo �- 11 � 5 (Finance Number _) DEPOSITIFEE APN: ' -'L,2- i 4�,-1 7 Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original 1 New or Revised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • (Staff/ Consultant /CD(Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/W ater /Sewer/f rail/Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised i Grading Plan Check Checkprint / Approved Copy 1 Original / New or Revised Plan Change Description: (Mass(Rough/Prelim inary/Precise) (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction ❑ Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return I Z- W S Please call: lcs Cs if necessary Originator: I10JP.'_J:5- Copies to: --n 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SGfARR/Inter —Trans . doc /03.02.99 1 of @f . 6INEERING SERVICES DEPAR: _-:NT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL L 4 '/L /f 3 CgtHCthidet Support Protects `(��`((jtiJ. IpbMet Support SeMCes 1 1 field Operotions J Subdivision Engineering Loffic Engineering F "-, T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ ;g O District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director (#I) Field,Operations (FO) ❑ A=NTIOIt: / �Q) DATE: Z is/ Regarding (Finance Number g - C—i 2--'LDEPOSIT� TPWnWMUP/M[IJ/DR (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE O MI&L/611A c " (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Z 2— - r-1 Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ SubmittaVAmended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo4' ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/rPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: !; Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title reportfVesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporatc/Partnership Papas ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Lerner• ❑ Deferred Monumerttatwo Letter ❑ Agency Lelia: ❑ Legal Description oPlat-❑ Recording Fee ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: 0 ( CD/ CS/ FIRF/SDWD/OMWD/LCWD /G &ErF/CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park p Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage p ❑ Assessments ❑ /r t r,,,s/)) , (/ /i /�a_/N C.iLJ= -- Irl..� /�'�`�+)" Agreement re: ❑ ..J'�1� Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ p Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) Grading Plan ubmitt Ian Change/As -built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Apprd ❑ cc • ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprin Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ CSoil Repo rt ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural a culations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Prmise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting do Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Requirements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval El For Your... Review ❑ Use Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633.26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 )SG /ARR/lnua Trws.dnd02 1199 1 of P PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 To: City of Encinitas C m-11711PIRIa011210> COWL9111i E Attached ❑ Under separate cover via THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Date: 12/15/2000 Job No. PE 789 Attn: Gary Lee Re: Clearing plan for Amdal Residential Care DEC 1 2WO E14 gINEEA1Nq CITY pF SfRVIC FNCINiTn_c ES Copies Date No. Description 3 As requested 1 24 x 36 Clearing Area Plan for Amdal Residential Care 3 2 Bonding Cost Estimates for Clearing Area Plan I I Letter Authorizing Pasco Engineering, Inc. as agent for clearing plan 1 Check #124 from Grauer Foundation to City of Encinitas for $700 MZGYu l g l 11:103 ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested For review and comment 111:1S/:13 U1 ed Ju Suiter H T ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE 14/S/60 APPLICANT NAME J.k Clil-A-ulGrz- J' -J0A %lJkJ APPUCANTADDRESS -;7ZIZJ kiciNrro PERMIT NUMBER Cf (=• RECEIPT NUMBER 00 t�72,6 ID CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant Construction Exempt Organizations Grading Plancheck Grading Inspection Final Map Processing Parcel Map Processing Permanent Encroachment Improvement Plancheck Improvement inspection Temporary Encroachment Street Vacation Street Name Change A.P.N. Report Securtty Deposit —ZCY2 . O`i TOTAL -7c5o• p� Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /Oct151998 AC 101-0000-345-01 .. CN 101-0000-345-0 .. EX 101 0 GR ADO . .. GI 101 .... . .. FM 101 .... .�.. PM .00 .:.. PE 101 -0000,345-114 .... ... TE 101-0000-345-12111 VA 101-0000-345-15#s SN 101-0000-345-134m . PN r .00 .. CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK ENGINEERING'& -- TMENT APPLICANT DEPOS. _ ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPUCANT ADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE - ED PROJECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED INTO PROJECT NUMBER FIELD 1 AMOUNT I TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE = SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPUCANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN PROJECT i AMOUNT TOTAL 1J:FYK074: It] I:1:14:1C[cm CLei 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 LrLNGj1NyE 0� VICES �T�rI-y'4! °�°��pv cr'Irrlrvlmky� pt�\ �71 r\rv\�/�°�� pn\ zI It AS LE=R 11 J R (O ll ll�1dZ1.L V 4LME ll ll AJL.d To: City of Encinitas Engineering Department WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: E Attached ❑ Under separate cover via. 1 Ill 1:2919711116L "II2191IN;l"V 61 Date: 1/17/2001 Job No. PE 789G Attn: T. O'Neal Re: Clearing Plan for Alzheimers Care Facility 6808 -GR Copies Date No. Description 1 As requested # Previous city check prints 2 1 2406 blueline of revised Clearing Plan 6808 -GR I „rr,�,1�— �splaa,ygpg.C.R - — I 2 Revised Bonding Cost Estimate for Clearing Plan (MUp R THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: 0 For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment REMARKS: Signed r. Just uiter ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM APPLICANT DATE /O, 4"E /dJ� n-V7,4 rah APPLICANT ADDRESS ZZi o j5;�a-f n.4aS a G1 on A.P.N. Report PN 101 -0000 -345 -2100 Sa^urlty Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK 60 TOTAL /S,ti V Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 �3n PERMIT NUMBER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS 1 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant AC 101- 0000 -345 0100 Construction CN 101 -0000- 345-0200 Exempt Organizations EX 101 - 0000 -345 -0400 Grading Plancheck GR 101. 0000 - 345-0700 Grading Inspection GI 101- 0000 - 345 -0800 Final Map Processing FM 101-0000 -345i 500 Parcel Map Processing PM 101. 0000 - 345 -0600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101 - 0000.345-1100 Improvement Plancheck IR 101. 0000 - 345 -O900 Improvement inspection II 101-0000 - 3451000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101-0000.345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101 - 0000 - 3451500 Street Name Change SN 101.0000- 3451300 A.P.N. Report PN 101 -0000 -345 -2100 Sa^urlty Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK 60 TOTAL /S,ti V Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 �3n ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSI a ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANTADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER I RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE - ED ROJECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED ITO PROJECT NUMBER FIELD TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE . SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN) PROJECT alt F AMOUNT TOTAL L NEERING SERVICES DEPARi VT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Prolec is Disldcf Support Services Feld Operolions Subdivision Engineering Troffic Engineering 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633. 2600 1FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/InGa Trans.duc/02. 11.99 1 of 1 T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ - t ATTENTION: DATE: Regarding (Finance Number - 641e-TDEPOSI� TPMMWMUP/MIN/DR: (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE 11 Ai--7-A&-10,tf5T- (Finance Number _�DEPOSIT/FEE APN: /aS aul3 t)tL- Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Subminal/Amended/COrrecled 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: L Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter• ❑ 6000l"f IoW S O1P- u Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: El _ Legal Description E] Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ _ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: •( CD/ CS/ FIRF/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &EITICATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreementre: ❑ �sJ� rr 1 ,r -eLe/L5 ` 1 1"` Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maim ❑ ❑ (�/ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined p Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Section ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (RoadA:)minagefWa ter /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) Grading Plu 2 Sub tan Change/As -built ProposedEy Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc • ❑ Blueline/Reddined ❑ Checkprintn iginal ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost stimate Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations❑ ( Mass/Rough/Pretiminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion ControVPlanting & Irrigation) As Per... Submi al quirements ❑ Our Conversation ❑ Public [nquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Re Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature C1 Information ❑ fig //view L Lt�e—' t� ORIGINATOR: -J � ame ) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633. 2600 1FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/InGa Trans.duc/02. 11.99 1 of 1 r T Y OF E N C I N I T A S NEERING SERVICES DEPART 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PARCEL NO. : 262- 160 -1700 JOB SITE ADDRESS: 1400ELK EL CAMINO REAL APPLICANT NAME GRAUER FOUNDATION (BUYER MAILING ADDRESS: 2210 ENCINITAS BLVD. CITY: ENCINITAS STATE: CA SOUTH IN ESCROW) PERMIT NO.: 6808GI PLAN NO.: 6808 -G PHONE NO.: 760- 944 -6777 ZIP: 92024- CONTRACTOR : SAN DIEGO GRADING PHONE NO.: 760-746-0700 LICENSE NO.: 763651 LICENSE TYPE: C12 ENGINEER : PASCO ENGINEERING INC. PHO E NO.: 858- 259 -8212 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 2/12/01 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 2/12/02 PERMIT ISSUED BY: 2v INSPECTOR: MEL CHAPPELL -- ----------------- - - - - -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS --------------------- -- - - - -- 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 700.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 2. INSPECTION FEE 885.00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 17,693.50 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 ------------- -- ---- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------------- - - -- -- CLEAR & GRUB 3.42 ACRE, PLACE 2,975EA GRAVEL BAG, INSTALL 1,700LF SILT FENCE, PLACE 200BAG BONDED FIBER MATRIX; ALL PER 98 -236 MUP /DR /EIA /CDP, PROPOSED CONGREGATE CARE FACILITY BY ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN DIEGO/ AMDAL RESIDENTIAL CARE. - - -- INSPECTION --- ------ - ------ DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. SIGNATURE PRINT NAME DATE SIGNiD r, �� 9 TELEPHONE NUMBER CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3. OTHER a ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM .�p COpilai Improvement Prges District Support Servic Fleld Operatio Subdivision Englneerir Traffic Engine,& T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services C_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ l ATTENTION: DATE: Regarding (Finance NumberZQI-C -4! Zj ) DEPOSIT /FEE TPM/ I AwdP/MIN/DR: `'lt (Finance Number ) DEPOSIT/FEE ° a r-v'"t' t=_. (Finance Number - _, DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TM/fPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Corporate/Parmership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat (3 Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail Sewer ❑ Park Drainage ❑ _ Agreement re: Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ Improvements ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Assessments p ❑❑ t;ommencvnaamonat -pace for uocufnent 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other 6) Copies to: Additional Notes: LEI • ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD/OMWD/LCWD /G&Err /CATV) Sketch 1 (if needed) / Description: L 1 I r ! Rae, rJ improvement Plane &Submittal/Plan Chang Built Propose Co ec ed ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Bluelin a - lined Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/Trail/Park/Facility) Gradin Plan�_Submittal/Plan Chan As -built Propose fretted ❑ Approved ❑ cc' ❑ Bluelin Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Requirement Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: / /- -~`J!¢ C . (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG /.41tR/In1ra_Trans doc/02. 11 .99 1 of 1 7 �i r� PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 RUN* ri:r c��i i �.� •�. ��n i r,ai. To: City of Encinitas Dept. of Engineering Tamara O'Neal 690 .x7=xu712XIIIIIIIU61yo IJl 0 Attached ❑ Under separate cover via THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 94-or Date: 31893992 Job No. PE 789AB Attn: Re: Grauer School As- Builts Copies Date No. Description 2 2 Red -line Copies of Improvement Plan As -Built 2 ❑ For review and comment 3 Red -line Copies of Grading Plan As -Built I c;ITYOFENCINI; -AY, !# "As Graded" Report from Soils Engineer vt/ t Sign I W. Justm Suiter THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: For approval to ❑ For your use MAR 18 M1,,2 ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment 1�I FfRIN-r SF.RVIC c;ITYOFENCINI; -AY, REMARKS: vt/ t Sign I W. Justm Suiter ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT F!._S ACTION FORM APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT NUMBER RECEIPT NUMBER (a 5-6 Y S' CHECK NUMBER 7 U �Y5 a CASHIER INITALS v v / DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant AC 101-0000. 345 -0100 Construction CN 101-0000 - 3454200 Exempt Organizations EX 101-0000-345-0400 Grading Plancheck 7 7y�/ • v_4J°C�D GR 101 - 0000345-0700 Grading Inspection GI 101-0000 - 3450800 Final Map Processing FM 101.0000 45-0500 Parcel Map Processing PM 101-0000 - 3450600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101 - 0000 - 345.1100 Improvement Plancheck eo IR 101-0000345 -0900 Improvement inspection 11 101.0000- 3451000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101- 0000 - 345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101 - 0000 - 345 -1500 Street Name Change SN 101-0000 - 345.1300 A.P.N. Report PN 101 4000. 3452100 Securfty Deposit i Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK CITY OF ENCINITAS PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 25, 2000 TO: Planning Commission VIA: ,/Bill Weedman, City Planner FROM: Community Development Department Tom Curriden, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing on a Major Use Permit, Design Review Permit, Coastal Development Permit, Section 4(d) Permit for the "interim take" of approximately 2.84 acres of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, and Environmental Initial Assessment to allow the phased construction of a new approx. 20,606 sq. ft. 56 -bed congregate care facility, along with related site improvements including parking, landscaping, and signage, in accordance with Chapters 30.74, 23.08, and 30.80 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, as well as the findings for the "interim take" of Coastal Sage Scrub habitat outlined in the November 1993 State NCCP Conservation Guidelines and with the Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP) Processing Guidelines; LOCATION: Southwest corner of El Camino Real and Tennis Club Drive; CASE NO.: 98 -236 MUP/DR/CDP; APPLICANT: AMDAL Residential Care. BACKGROUND The public hearing on this application was initiated at the Planning Commission meeting of February 24, 2000. Commissioners may refer to the staff report for that meeting for a full project description and analysis. At the conclusion of their deliberations at that meeting, the Commission voted unanimously to continue the hearing at the request of the applicant to the May 11, 2000 meeting (and it was again continued at that meeting to May 25, 2000), in order to address design- related concerns expressed by the Commission. Those concerns involved (1) exploring modifications to the configuration or layout of the buildings with the goal of preserving more of the sensitive Coastal Sage Scrub vegetation on the site; and (2) consideration of revisions to the design of the buildings (and site improvements such as walls and fences) to achieve a higher degree of articulation and visual interest. The Commission also asked staff in their motion to respond to several issues raised during oral presentations to the Commission by Donna Westbrook. ANALYSIS: With respect to the preservation of more of the Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS) habitat on -site, the applicant was able to preserve an additional .13 acres of CSS by moving the southerly building in an easterly direction toward El Camino Real, and by deleting the covered patio areas off the back of the buildings, thus reducing the width of the fuel modification zone. The westerly boundary of the fuel modification associated with the previous design and the one now required are reflected on the new site plan. An Addendum to the Environmental Initial Study has bee prepared CD1tc198236MUP.PC2 Last Edit: 05(12/2000 to reflect the new area of impact to CSS (2.84 acres versus the 2.97 acres impacted under the previous design), which is attached hereto as Exhibit PC -2. The mitigation for the impact to CS is at a 2:1 ratio (5.68 acres), consisting of the on -site preservation of 1.54 acres and the off -site acquisition of 4.14 acres or equivalent credits. With regard to the design of the buildings and related improvements, a series of revisions have been made. Exhibit PC -2 hereto is a letter submitted by project architect Michael McHale discussing the changes made to the design of the building and site improvements and the reasoning behind those changes. On the east elevation of the buildings (facing El Camino Real), a higher and more prominent overhang element has been added at the entries to the buildings. For the stated purpose of reducing the symmetrical appearance of the east elevation, a flat - roofed, column- supported walkway overhang has been added on the south side of that elevation, and a stone veneer has been added around and above the windows on a portion of the north side. The stone veneer is also applied to the support columns for the entry and walkway overhangs. The use of accent features and colors has also been increased to add variation in the appearance of the building. Wood shutters have been added to windows on the side and rear elevations of the building, along with painted wood pot shelves beneath, and 8 -inch wide by 1 %: -inch deep pop -outs have been added around all windows and door frames. The stucco exterior walls of the buildings are proposed to be of an off -white "Eggshell" color, with the base course around their entire perimeter (the lower approx. 3 -ft.) painted a dark brown color. That medium brown color and two lighter brown colors are used on accents around the buildings, including along roof fascia, the tops and bottoms of support columns, on the pop -outs around windows and doors, and within small square reveals added at certain locations near the tops of the walls. The proposed roof tiles are now of a variegated S -type tile, and the architect notes that the pitch of the roof has been lowered from 7:12 to 6:12. Exhibit PC -3 attached hereto is a copy of the draft minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of February 24, 2000, which contain the comments made by Donna Westbrook during the public hearing, as well as a response to those comments from staff. Alternative actions available to the Planning Commission are (1) adopt the attached draft resolution, with findings and conditions, approving the application as submitted or modified, (2) direct staff to return with a resolution, with findings specified by the Commission, denying the application as submitted, (3) continue the hearing to a specified date to allow submittal and review of any needed additional information. Environmental Review and NCCP/MHCP Coordination - An Environmental Initial Assessment was prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which determined that with incorporation of all mitigation measures outlined therein, set forth in Attachment "C" to the draft resolution (Exhibit PC -1 hereto), the project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for adoption in conjunction with project approval. The 30-day public comment period to the document was separately advertised and noticed, and ran from March 24, 199 to April 23, 1999. Three correspondences were received relating to the environmental document. Those comments, and a response to them from the assigned Environmental Consultant (Dudek and CD1?r98236MUP.PC2 Cast Edit. 0511212000 Associates), were attached to the staff report for the February 24, 2000 meeting. With the .13 acre decrease in CSS take associated with the revisions, an Addendum to the EIS with revised mitigation measures reflecting that change in impact has been prepared by Dudek and Associates, and is attached as Exhibit PC -4 hereto. With respect to coordination with the ongoing NCCP and MHCP programs, the required findings for issuance of the habitat loss permit associated with this project are contained in the attached draft resolution of approval pursuant to the City's approved policy for implementing those programs. Those findings relate to preserving the connectivity of significant areas or corridors of resources and minimizing impact to them. FISCAL AND STAFF IMPACTS: The approval of the Major Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit application will create no direct fiscal or staff impacts. RECOMMENDATION: Before public comment is received, disclose all outside information and contacts upon which the decision will be based, receive public testimony and adopt the attached draft resolution approving Major Use Permit, Design Review Permit, Section 4(d) permit, and Coastal Development Permit 98 -236 MUP/DR/CDP/EIA. CD1?c198236MUP.PC2 Last Edit. 0511212000 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Exhibit PC -1: Draft resolution of approval; Exhibit PC -2: Letter discussing modifications to project drawings dated received May 9, 2000; Exhibit PC -3 Excerpt from the minutes of the February 24, 2000 Planning Commission meeting containing concerns expressed by Donna Westbrook at that meeting, as well as a response to those comments; Exhibit PC -4: Addendum to the EIS and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration from Dudek and Associates (containing revised habitat impact figures) dated May, 2000; Exhibit PC -5: Project drawings consisting of 10 sheets, including a site plan, a sheet entitled "site details ", two sheets of elevations, floor plan, roof plan, and a landscape and irrigation plan comprised of four sheets, all dated received by the City of Encinitas on May 10, 2000. CD1Tc196236MUP.PC2 Last Edit 05V12/2000 EXHIBIT PC -1 RESOLUTION NO. PC 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A MAJOR USE PERMIT, DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT, SECTION 4(d) PERMIT, AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 20,600 SQ. FT., 56 -BED CONGREGATE CARE FACILITY ALONG WITH RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING PARKING, LANDSCAPING, AND SIGNAGE, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TENNIS CLUB DRIVE AND EL CAMINO REAL (CASE NO. 98 -236 MUP /CDP/EIA; APN: 262 - 160 -17) WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Major Use Permit, Coastal Development Permit, Section 4(d) Permit for the "interim take" of approximately 2.97 acres of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, and Environmental Initial Assessment was filed by AMDAL Residential Care to allow the phased construction of a new approx. 20,600 sq. ft. 56 -bed congregate care facility, along with related site improvements including parking, landscaping, and signage, in accordance with Chapters 30.74, 23.08, and 30.80 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, as well as the findings for the "interim take" of Coastal Sage Scrub habitat outlined in the November 1993 State NCCP Conservation Guidelines and with the Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MRCP) Processing Guidelines, for the property located in the R3 Zone at the southwest corner of Tennis Club Drive and El Camino Real, legally described as: The Easterly 498.00 ft. of the following described Land: The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; and the North Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 13 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing on the application on February 24, 2000 and May 25, 2000, at which time all those desiring to be heard were heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered, without limitation: The February 24, 2000 and May 25, 2000 agenda reports to the Planning Commission with attachments; 2. The General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Municipal Code, and associated Land Use Maps; 3. Oral evidence submitted at the hearing; 4. Written evidence submitted at the hearing; CO 98236MUP.res (5111/00) 5. Project plans consisting of 10 sheets, including a site plan, a sheet entitled "site details ", two sheets of elevations, floor plan, roof plan, and a landscape and irrigation plan comprised of four sheets, all dated received by the City of Encinitas on May 10, 2000, as well as the colored elevations and color and material sample board reviewed by the Planning Commission at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings pursuant to Chapters 30.74, 23.08, and 30.80, of the Encinitas Municipal Code as well as the findings for the "interim take" of Coastal Sage Scrub habitat outlined in the November 1993 State NCCP Conservation Guidelines and with the Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MRCP) Processing Guidelines: (SEE ATTACHMENT "A ") NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Encinitas hereby approves application 98 -236 MUP /CDP/EIA subject to the following conditions: (SEE ATTACHMENT "B ") BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission, in its independent judgment, has reviewed the Environmental Initial Study prepared for the project and has determined that with incorporation of the mitigation measures contained therein and made conditions of approval for the application, all project impacts will be reduced to levels of insignificance and the Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby adopted in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CDRcP98236MUP.res (501 100) PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of May, 2000, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Alice Jacobson, Chair of the Encinitas Planning Commission ATTEST: Sandra Holder Secretary NOTE: This action is subject to Chapter 1.04 of the Municipal Code, which specifies time limits for legal challenges. CDRcIV8236MURres (511/00) ATTACHMENT "A" Resolution No. PC 2000 - Case No. 98 -236 MUP /CDP/EIA FINDINGS FOR A USE PERMIT STANDARD: In accordance with Section 30.74.070 of the Municipal Code, a use permit application shall be approved unless findings of fact are made, based upon the information presented in the application or during the hearing, which support one or more of the following conclusions; 1. The location, size, design or operating characteristics of the proposed project will be incompatible with or will adversely affect or will be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residences, buildings, structures or natural resources, with consideration given to, but not limited to: a. The inadequacy of public facilities, services and utilities to serve the proposed project; b. The unsuitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed; and C. The harmful effect, if any, upon environmental quality and natural resources of the city; Facts: The subject property is 4.8 gross acres in area, and is located in the R -3 zone at the southwest comer of Tennis Club Drive and El Camino Real. The proposed project consists of a Major Use Permit, Design Review Permit, Coastal Development Permit, Section 4(d) Permit for the "interim take" of approximately 2.84 acres of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, and Environmental Initial Assessment for construction of a new approx. 20,600 sq. ft. 56 -bed congregate care facility, along with related site improvements including parking, landscaping, and signage. The application is processed in accordance with Chapters 30.74, 23.08, and 30.80 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, as well as the findings for the "interim take" of Coastal Sage Scrub habitat outlined in the November 1993 State NCCP Conservation Guidelines and with the Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP) Processing Guidelines. All public services and utilities are in place to serve the project. Discussion: With regard to the suitability of the site for the type and intensity of use proposed, the information contained in the public record suggests that this use would be compatible with surrounding uses. The nature of the congregate (Alzheimer's) care facility is that it will be a relatively low traffic generator. Since the residents are unable to drive, the amount of traffic generated by the facility and the parking needed is a function of the number of staff and visitors anticipated. The total traffic generation from the project, based upon SANDAG trip generation C01W98236MUP.res (5111100) statistics, would be 112 Average Daily Trips (ADT's). This is consistent with the applicant's estimation of 100 ADT's (50 inbound trips), based upon (1) 3 employee shifts with 12 employees per shift, (2) an estimated eight visitors per day, and (3) trash, deliveries, and doctor visits at an estimated 6 per day. This is comparable to the amount of trip generation that would be anticipated with single - family residential development of the site in accordance with its present zoning. While a detailed planning analysis would need to be done to determine the precise development potential of this site, 112 ADTs would equate to less than the traffic generation of 12 single - family dwellings (120 ADT). The 4.8 -acre site would yield a density of 12 units at the mid -range density of the R -3 zone (2.5 units/acre), although there would be some adjustment downward for access and slope factors. The two approximately 10,300 sq. ft. buildings are obviously larger in area than any detached residential building would be, but the structures are one story high, set well back from El Camino Real with a large landscaped and naturally vegetated area in front of them, and of an architectural style moreover in character with residential development and with the similar approved facility across Tennis Club Drive to the north. Thus, the facility should not be overly prominent or visually incompatible with the surrounding area, which is comprised mainly of single - family residences on large lots and a nearby tennis club facility. With compliance with Specific Condition SCB of this resolution requiring the developer to obtain access rights to Tennis Club Drive prior to issuance of any building or grading permits, all public services and utilities are in place to serve the project. Acquisition of access rights to Tennis Club Drive is advantageous in avoiding an additional drive approach onto El Camino Real, and to avoid the potential of additional access road(s) being constructed in areas vegetated with sensitive habitat. With regard to environmental impacts, an Environmental Initial Assessment was performed in conjunction with the project which determined that, with incorporation of mitigation measures as set forth therein, and included as Attachment "C" to this resolution, the project would result in no significant adverse environmental impacts. Conclusion: The Planning Commission determines that the subject property is suitable for the type and intensity of use proposed, that adequate public services and utilities are in place to serve the project subject to the conditions of this approval, and that the project will not result in any harmful effects to the environment. 2. The impacts of the proposed project will adversely affect the policies of the Encinitas General Plan or the provisions of the Municipal Code; and 3. The project fails to comply with any other regulations, conditions, or policies imposed by the Municipal Code. CDta98236MUP.res (6/11100) Facts: The subject property is located in the R -3 zone. Chapter 30.09 of the Municipal Code provides that a congregate care facility may be permitted in the R -3 zone upon issuance of a Major Use Permit. Applicable General Plan policies include Land Use Element Policy 6.1 and Resource Management Element 10.5 discussed below. Discussion: The project complies with all of the technical development standards for the R -3 zone set forth in Chapter 30.16. of the Municipal Code, including setbacks, lot coverage, and building height. Approval of the Major Use Permit, Design Review Permit, and Coastal Permit based upon the findings set forth in this resolution will thus satisfy the requirements of the Municipal Code. The purpose of the use permit process is to insure compatibility of a proposed use with the site and surrounding areas, which this project accomplishes for the reasons discussed under Finding #I above. With respect to General Plan goals and policies, Policy 6.1 states "Permit commercial land uses and other types of non - residential development only in those areas where such development presently is concentrated or where indicated by the General Plan, as long as such development does not result in land use conflicts with surrounding residential development." The areas fronting El Camino Real in the vicinity include a variety of use types; single- family residential, multifamily residential, churches, preschool, and others. As discussed under Finding #1 above, the proposed facility is compatible in terms of intensity of use and in terms of the visual/land use considerations, because it is two one -story buildings of an architectural style compatible with other residential and non - residential buildings in the area (including the approved care facility immediately to the north across Tennis Club Drive). Policy 10.5 of the Resource Management Element of the General Plan calls for the City to apply standards to development designed on Coastal Sage Scrub environmentally sensitive habitat lands to conserve as much of the resource as is feasible, and to minimize fragmentation/maximize connectivity of contiguous habitat corridors. As is discussed in further detail in the Biological Survey Report and Determination of Consistency with NCCP Conservation Guidelines — AMDAL Residential Care Project" prepared by DUDEK and Associates dated February 8, 1999, the project accomplishes these objectives. The project conserves 1.54 acres of disturbed Coastal Sage Scrub and .29 acres of Southern Maritime Chaparral on- site. In order to preserve connectivity between significant areas of similar vegetation to the west within the Lux canyon area and areas to the east, including vegetation surrounding the Sage Canyon project previously constructed and the mitigation bank immediately to the east of that property, a habitat corridor has been designed along Tennis Club Drive. In conjunction with a similar setback required for the Sommerford Place facility to the immediate north of this site, an approx. 150 -ft. wide corridor will be preserved. CDRc198236MUP.res (5/11/00) Conclusion: The Planning Commission determines that the project is consistent with the Municipal Code and General Plan. FINDINGS FOR DESIGN REVIEW STANDARD: Section 23.08.072 of the Encinitas Municipal Code provides that an application for a design review permit must be granted unless, based upon the information presented in the application and during the Public Hearing, the authorized agency makes any of the following regulatory conclusions: a. The project design is inconsistent with the General Plan, a Specific Plan, or the provisions of the Municipal Code. Facts: The proposed project consists of a Major Use Permit, Design Review Permit, Coastal Development Permit, Section 4(d) Permit for the "interim take" of approximately 2.84 acres of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, and Environmental Initial Assessment for construction of a new approx. 20,600 sq. ft. 56 -bed congregate care facility, along with related site improvements including parking, landscaping, and signage. Discussion: The project is consistent with the Municipal Code and General plan for the reasons discussed under Use Permit Findings #2 and #3 above. Conclusion: The Planning Commission determines that the proposed project is consistent with the Municipal Code and General Plan. b. The project design is substantially inconsistent with the Design Review Guidelines. Facts: The proposed congregate care facility is subject to design review in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 23.08 of the Municipal Code. The City's Design Review Guidelines, adopted by reference in Section 23.08.072 of the Municipal Code, contain guidelines as to site, building, landscape, and sign design, which are applicable to this project. Discussion: In terms of site design, the project has been laid out in accordance with its function as a congregate care facility; a functionally integrated, secured one -story complex with parking and driveway areas around its perimeter. The main entrances are pronounced and apparent from most locations, and pedestrian and vehicular movements are largely separated. No significant views through the site are present which would be impeded by the project, and, in terms of views to the site, the buildings are well set back from El Camino Real and Tennis Club Dr. and buffered by the extensive natural vegetation proposed on the property. Grading changes to existing landforms are limited to the creation of a 2:1 slope for a horizontal distance of approximately 20 ft. in the front central portion of the site up to the parking lot CD1?c198236MUP.res (5%1/00) area, and a 2: l slope around the rear yard areas and access driveway to create a level area for the development (which is mandated for this type of use). A significant amount of the rear portion of the lot is to remain undisturbed, as will be a 60 -ft. corridor along the northerly boundary of the site and the southeasterly portion of the site. In terms of building design, the structures are a one -story building with an off -white stucco exterior, with accents and a base course around the perimeter of the buildings colored with 3 different shades of brown. A stone veneer is applied to walkway and entry support columns. The roof is on a variegated S -type tile. Most of the buildings would be at a maximum height of 17 ft. 6 in., with the entry overhangs rising to 23 ft., consistent in scale with surrounding development. The architectural theme is carried out consistently among all elevations and variation in exterior colors and materials have been used with constraint. In terms of landscaping, plant materials have been selected which are predominantly of a drought tolerant variety. The quantity and placement of the materials selected will create a sense of continuity throughout the site. Trees are of a minimum 15- gallon size and most shrubs are predominantly of a 5- gallon size such that a mature appearance should be achieved within 3 years time. In terms of sign design, project signage is limited to a two - sided, V- shaped monument sign that is of a durable construction, being CMU block with a stucco exterior consistent in color with that of the buildings. The sign is 5 ft. in height and 7 ft. in width and is located more that 10 ft. back from the El Camino Real right -of- way, such that it will not be obtrusive in appearance. The sign contains large letters which will display its message clearly. While signs of this type (monument signs) are not otherwise allowed in residential zones, Section 30.54.060(1) of the Municipal Code allows projects subject to the use permit process to propose signage which varies from the residential zone limitations subject to Planning Commission approval. In this instance, the monument sign proposed displays its message clearly, is in scale with the project and is not incompatible with surrounding development, and is constructed of durable materials. The Planning Commission thus determines that the sign is appropriate for this project. Conclusion: The Planning Commission determines that the project is in substantial conformance with the design criteria set forth in Chapter 23.08 of the Municipal Code. C. The project would adversely affect the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Facts: The proposed project consists of a Major Use Permit, Design Review Permit, Coastal Development Permit, Section 4(d) Permit for the "interim take" of approximately 2.84 acres of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, and Environmental Initial CORcV38236MURres (5i11/00) Assessment for construction of a new approx. 20,600 sq. ft. 56 -bed congregate care facility, along with related site improvements including parking, landscaping, and signage. Discussion. Subject to the mitigation measures incorporated with the project as set forth in Attachment "C" hereto, the Environmental Initial Assessment prepared in conjunction with the project determined that it will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. All public services and utilities are in place to serve the project. Conclusion: The Planning Commission determines that the proposed project will not adversely affect the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. d. The project would cause the surrounding neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or value. Facts: The proposed project consists of a Major Use Permit, Design Review Permit, Coastal Development Permit, and Section 4(d) Permit for the "interim take" of approximately 2.84 acres of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, and Environmental Initial Assessment for construction of a new approx. 20,600 sq. ft. 56 -bed congregate care facility, along with related site improvements including parking, landscaping, and signage. Discussion: No evidence has been presented to indicate that the project would in any way materially depreciate the surrounding neighborhood in appearance or value. The intensity of the use and scale of the project are compatible with surrounding uses for the reasons discussed further under the "Findings for a Use Permit" above. Conclusion: The Planning Commission determines that the project will not cause the surrounding neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or value. CD1?a98236MUP.res (5111100) FINDINGS FOR A SECTION 4(d) PERMIT STANDARD: In accordance with the November 1993 State NCCP Conservation Guidelines and with the Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP), and the implementing procedures adopted by the Encinitas City Council on October 14, 1994, the authorized agency must make the following findings, based upon the information presented in the application or during the hearing, in order to permit any proposed "take" of Coastal Sage Scrub habitat: 1) The proposed habitat loss is consistent with the interim loss criteria in the November 1993 State NCCP Conservation Guidelines, and with any subregional process if established for the MHCP subregion. a) The habitat loss does not cumulatively exceed the 5% guideline. b) The habitat loss will not preclude connectivity between areas of high habitat values. C) The habitat loss will not preclude or prevent the preparation of the subregional NCCP. d) The habitat loss has been minimized and mitigated to the maximum extent practicable in accordance with Section 4.3 of the November 1993 State NCCP Process Guidelines. 2) The habitat loss will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery of listed species in the wild. 3) The habitat loss is incidental to otherwise lawful activities. Facts: The proposed project involves the destruction or "take" of approximately 2.84 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub, and thus requires issuance of the Section 4(d) Permit. Discussion: Based upon the Biological Survey Report and Determination of Consistency with NCCP Conservation Guidelines — AMDAL Residential Care Project dated February 8, 1999 and prepared by Dudek and Associates, the following evidence supports the above - listed findings: 1. The proposed habitat loss is consistent with the interim loss criteria in the November 1993 State NCCP Conservation Guidelines and with the Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MHCP) process since: (a) The CSS habitat loss of 2.84 acres associated with this project does not cumulatively exceed the 5% "take" guideline since the City has an area of 1,103.1 acres of Coastal sage scrub within its corporate boundary (including the 49.1 acres of protected Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub added by the annexation of the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan area). Accordingly, the "5% Interim Take Limitation" is 55.1 acres. To date, the City has permitted or reserved the "take" of 34.9 acres of CSS, CD/to/98236MURres (5111/00) leaving 20.2 acres available to future development. Should grading occur for this project, the additional 2.84 acres of "take" will leave the City 17.36 acres of Coastal sage scrub as the amount set aside for future projects in accordance with the 5% Interim Take Limitations. (b) The loss of Coastal Sage Scrub associated with the construction of this project would reduce but would not preclude connectivity of areas of high habitat value. Areas requiring habitat connectivity appear to be the undeveloped lands east and west of El Camino Real, lands surrounding San Elijo Lagoon, and Escondido Creek. Connectivity between these areas already is affected by the presence of El Camino Real and a number of existing residences, athletic facilities and agriculture in Lux Canyon, Interstate 5, Manchester Avenue and residential and institutional development along Manchester Avenue. Connectivity along the main spine of habitat west of El Camino Real would not be affected. The only possibly significant loss of connectivity would be across El Camino Real. The only potential connection will be maintained by the revegetation of a 60 -foot wide area along the northern boundary of the proposed development. This revegetation area will be composed of Coastal Sage Scrub plant species similar to those presently on -site. The corridor of revegetation will match a similar corridor provided by the adjacent Sommerford project across Tennis Club Drive to the north, thus creating an approximately 150 ft. wide connection between habitat on the east and west sides of El Camino Real. (c) The habitat loss will not preclude or prevent the preparation of the subregional NCCP since the habitat loss is minimal (2.84 acres), would be mitigated (by on site dedication and enhancement, as well as off site acquisition of 5.68 acres of CSS or equivalent credits), would not preclude connectivity (because the connectivity along the main spine of habitat west of El Camino Real would not be affected), and would not jeopardize conservation efforts toward any sensitive species since there are no known occurrences of listed endangered plants within the alignment, and the effects to known sensitive species populations is small. (d) There has been an attempt to minimize the extent of habitat loss on site. The development plan includes a measure to retain natural open space in the western portion of the property. Impacts will be mitigated through on -site enhancement and off site acquisition and dedication as open space (or acquisition of credits) of high quality native habitat. 2. The 2.84 -acre habitat loss will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival and/or recovery of the target species in the wild. One Gnatcatcher is known to inhabit the immediate vicinity. 3. The habitat loss associated with construction of the AMDAL facility is incidental to otherwise lawful activities since the project (with issuance of the Major Use Permit, in accordance with Chapter 30.09 of the Encinitas Municipal Code) is CDftW36MUP.res (5✓11/DO) 0 consistent with the Encinitas Municipal Code and General Plan, and is required to receive all permits and clearances from local, state and federal governmental agencies and appropriate utility and service districts. Conclusion: The Planning Commission determines that the proposed habitat loss associated with this project is consistent with the interim loss criteria in the November 1993 State NCCP Conservation Guidelines and with the Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MRCP). FINDINGS FOR A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT STANDARD: Section 30.80.090 of the Municipal Code provides that the authorized agency must make the following findings of fact, based upon the information presented in the application and during the Public Hearing, in order to approve a coastal development permit: The project is consistent with the certified Local Coastal Program of the City of Encinitas; and 2. The proposed development conforms with Public Resources Code Section 21000 and following (CEQA) in that there are no feasible mitigation measures or feasible alternatives available which would substantially lessen any significant adverse impact that the activity may have on the environment; and 3. For projects involving development between the sea or other body of water and the nearest public road, approval shall include a specific finding that such development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Section 30200 et. seq. of the Coastal Act. Facts: The subject property is 4.8 gross acres in area, and is located in the R -3 zone at the southwest corner of Tennis Club Drive and El Camino Real. The proposed project consists of a Major Use Permit, Design Review Permit, Coastal Development Permit, Section 4(d) Permit for the "interim take" of approximately 2.84 acres of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, and Environmental Initial Assessment for the phased construction of a new, approx. 20,600 sq. ft. 56 -bed congregate care facility, along with related site improvements including parking, landscaping, and signage. The application is processed in accordance with Chapters 30.74, 23.08, and 30.80 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, as well as the findings for the "interim take" of Coastal Sage Scrub habitat outlined in the November 1993 State NCCP Conservation Guidelines and with the Multiple Habitat Conservation Plan (MRCP) Processing Guidelines. CDtcN8236MUP.res (5111100) Discussion: The City's certified Local Coastal Program is comprised of the Municipal Code (including Chapters 30.74 - Use Permits, Chapter 23.08 - Design Review, and Chapter 30.80 - Coastal Development Permits) and significant portions of the City's General Plan. For the reasons also cited under Finding #'s 2 and 3 for a Major Use Permit above, this project is in conformance with the General Plan, specifically including Land Use Element Policy 6.1 and Resource Management Policy 10.5. With respect to the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code, the proposed use is allowed in the R -3 zone upon issuance of a major use permit pursuant to Chapter 30.09 of the Municipal Code, and the project complies with all of the technical development standards of the R -3 zone set forth in Chapter 30.16 of the Municipal Code. The Environmental Initial Assessment prepared in conjunction with the application determined that with incorporation of the mitigation measures set forth in Attachment "C" hereto, the project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Finding #3 is not applicable given the project's inland location. Conclusion: The Planning Commission determines (1) that the proposed project is consistent with the certified Local Coastal Program of the City of Encinitas, (2) that it conforms with Public Resources Code Section 21000 and following (CEQA) in that subject to the mitigation measures incorporated with the project as set forth in Attachment "C" hereto, the Environmental Initial Assessment prepared in conjunction with the project determined that the project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts and, therefore, no evaluation of feasible alternatives is necessary, and (3) that Finding #3 is not applicable given the project's inland location. CWcA8236MUP ms (5(11/00) SCI ATTACHMENT "B" Resolution No. PC 2000 -_ Case No. 98 -236 MUP /CDP/EIA Applicant: AMDAL Residential Care Location: Southwest comer of Tennis Club Dr. and El Camino Real SC2 This approval will expire on May 25, 2002 at 5:00 pm, two years after the approval of this project, unless the conditions have been met or an extension of time has been approved pursuant to the Municipal Code. SC5 This project is conditionally approved as set forth on the project drawings consisting of 10 sheets, including a site plan, a sheet entitled "site details ", two sheets of elevations, floor plan, roof plan, and a landscape and irrigation plan comprised of four sheets, all dated received by the City of Encinitas on May 10, 2000, as well as the colored elevations and color and material sample board reviewed by the Planning Commission at the public hearing, all designated as approved by the Planning Commission on May 25, 2000, and shall not be altered without express authorization by the Community Development Department. SCA�e developer shall obtain the Director of Engineering Service's approval of the project improvement plans and enter into a secured agreement with the City for completion of said improvements prior to issuance of any building permit within this project. The improvements shall be constructed and accepted for maintenance by the City Council prior to occupancy of any structure within the project. The `*01?. improvements are: Curb, gutter, sidewalk, and AC pavement along the frontage of t3S El Camino Real. The structural section of the required pavement along El Camino Q,Or Real shall conform to City of Encinitas standards based on R -value tests, with a TI of 12. Curb face to be 53 feet from Centerline. Tennis Club Drive to be improved as needed for all weather access to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Department. SCB Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for this project, the developer shall provide evidence satisfactory to the Community Development Department and r4& Engineering Services Department that access rights to Tennis Club Drive have been obtained for this site, and that all rights to the existing 20 ft. private road easement along the northern boundary of the site, set forth in the document recorded as File # f 74- 000038 of Official Records in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder, have been relinquished. MW98236MUP.res (5/11100) SCC A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as set forth in Section 2.18 on pages 20 and 21 of the Environmental Initial Assessment — AMDAL Residential Care Facility, Prepared by DUDEK and Associates dated February, 1999, as well as the Addendums thereto dated November, 1999, and May, 2000, and shall be established and funded by the developer or property owner. The amount of funds necessary to implement the MMRP will be determined by the Community Development and Engineering Services Departments prior to issuance of any permits for the project. The Mitigation and Monitoring program is appended as Attachment "C" to this resolution. Those measures include the acquisition of 5.68 acres of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub off -site (or equivalent credits), preservation of 1.54 acres of disturbed Coastal Sage Scrub and .29 acres of Southern Maritime Chaparral on -site through dedication of a biological open space easement, and revegetationof .32 acres on -site. GI STANDARD CONDITIONS CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): G2 This approval may be appealed to the City Council within 15 calendar days from the date of this approval in accordance with Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code. G4 Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall cause a covenant regarding real property to be recorded. Said covenant shall set forth the terms and conditions of this grant of approval and shall be of a form and content satisfactory to the Community Development Director. G5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Municipal Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived herein. G9 Trash enclosure(s) shall be constructed of masonry with an exterior compatible with that of the building(s), and shall be provided with view - obstructing solid metal gates as approved by the authorized agency. Adequate space for recyclable materials shall be provided within the enclosure in accordance with Municipal Code requirements. The applicant shall review the design of the trash enclosure with the service provider and receive approval prior to building permit issuance. GIO All retaining and other freestanding walls, fences, and enclosures shall be architecturally designed in a manner similar to, and consistent with, the primary structures (e.g. stucco - coated masonry block, split -face block or slump stone). These items shall be approved by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building and/or grading permits. CDIV98236MURres (5111/00) G11 All roof - mounted equipment and appurtenances, including air conditioners and associated ductwork and conduits, shall be architecturally integrated, and shall be shielded from view and sound buffered to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. Ground - mounted mechanical and electrical equipment shall also be screened through use of a wall, fence, landscaping, berm, or combination thereof to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. All exterior accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary building's exterior to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. G12 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed or secured to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. G13 The applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, School Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Flood Control Mitigation Fees, Park Mitigation Fees, and Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees. Arrangements to pay these fees shall be made prior to building permit issuance to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Engineering Services Departments. The applicant is advised to contact the Community Development Department regarding Park Mitigation Fees, the Engineering Services Department regarding Flood Control and Traffic Fees, applicable School District(s) regarding School Fees, the Fire Department regarding Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees, and the applicable Utility Departments or Districts regarding Water and/or Sewer Fees. GIS Parking lot lights shall have a maximum height of eighteen (18) feet from the finished grade of the parking surface, and the light source shall be directed away from all property lines, adjacent streets and residences. G17 In accordance with the provisions of the Off -Street Parking Design Manual, all parking spaces (except handicapped spaces) shall be delineated by double -line striping consisting of 4 -inch wide painted white lines 1 to 2 feet apart, and all parking areas with more than one row of parking spaces shall have directional signs �,,�.J or painted directional arrows where one way travel is necessary to guide traffic, all oty of which shall be indicated in building plans and found satisfactory by the ommunity Development e a rior to final approval of the project's ut permit. A jacent to the sides of the parking lot landscape islands, stalls shall be provided with a 12" wide concrete strip adjacent to the island's curb. L1 The project is subject to Chapter 23.26 of the Municipal Code (Water Efficient Landscape Program), which requires a landscape and irrigation plan to be prepared by a State licensed landscape designer. The requirements for the plans are listed in Chapter 23.26. The landscape and irrigation plans must be submitted as part of the building permit application for the project. CD1tc198236MUP.les (5/11/00) L2 All required plantings and automated irrigation systems shall be in place prior to use or occupancy of new buildings or structures. All required plantings and automated irrigation systems shall be maintained in good condition, and whenever necessary, shall be replaced with new materials to ensure continued compliance with applicable landscaping, buffering, and screening requirements. All landscaping and irrigation systems shall be maintained in a manner that will not depreciate adjacent property values and otherwise adversely affect adjacent properties. All irrigation lines shall be installed and maintained underground (except drip irrigation systems). S3 Signs are approved as submitted and as shown in the approved project plans. Any alteration/additionto the approved signs not exempted in Municipal Code Chapter 30.60 may require a permit amendment, and the applicant should contact the Community Development Department prior to undertaking any such modification. U1 At all times during the effective period of this permit, the responsible party shall obtain and maintain in valid force and effect, each and every license and permit required by a governmental agency for the operation of the authorized activity. U2 In the event that any of the conditions of this permit are not satisfied, the Community Development Department shall cause a noticed hearing to be set before the authorized agency to determine whether the City of Encinitas should revoke this permit. U5 Nothing in this permit shall authorize the applicant to intensify the authorized activity beyond that which is specifically described in this permit. U7 Any future modifications to the approved project will be reviewed relative to the findings for substantial conformance with a use permit contained in Section 30.74.105 of the Municipal Code. Modifications beyond the scope described therein will require submittal and approval of an amendment to the use permit by the authorized agency. U8 All project grading shall conform with that shown on the approved project plans. If no grading is proposed on the approved plans, or subsequent grading plans are inconsistent with the grading shown on the approved plans, a use permit modification for such grading shall be obtained from the authorized agency of the City prior to issuance of grading or building permits. HW I Approval of the 4(d) permit in conjunction with this application does not constitute authorization for the take of habitat at this time. The City has a "first -come, first - served" policy for interim taking of habitat lands through the 4(d) permitting process, such that the take will be authorized only at such time that a grading plan is submitted and approved by the City as being within the cumulative 5% take limitation for habitat lands. CD1?c198236MUP.res (5/11/00) HW6 This project has been identified as having a potential impact on fish and/or wildlife; therefore, pursuant to Section 711.4 of the State Fish and Game Code, the applicant must submit to the City of Encinitas a negotiable check in the amount of $1,275.00 if this project includes a Negative Declaration, or a check in the amount of $875.00 if this project includes an Environmental Impact Report. The purpose of the above State established fee is to defray the cost of managing and protecting fish and wildlife resources which may be impacted by the development. The check, made payable to the County Clerk of San Diego County, must be submitted prior to the end of the 4th day following the City's action. Failure to submit a negotiable check will cause the project approval to become null and void since the Notice of Determination can not be filed without payment of this fee or authorized notice of exemption as provided in Section 711.4. NO BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER ENTITLEMENTS WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THIS CONDITION IS SATISFIED. B1 BUILDING CONDITION(S) CONTACT THE ENCINITAS BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): B2 The applicant shall submit a complete set of construction plans to the Building Division for plancheck processing. The submittal shall include a Soils /Geotechnical Report, structural calculations, and State Energy compliance documentation (Title 24). Construction plans shall include a site plan, a foundation plan, floor and roof framing plans, floor plan(s), section details, exterior elevations, and materials specifications. Submitted plans must show compliance with the latest adopted editions of the California Building Code (The Uniform Building Code with California Amendments, the California Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Codes). Commercial and Multi - residential construction must also contain details and notes to show compliance with State disabled accessibility mandates. These comments are preliminary only. A comprehensive plancheck will be completed prior to permit issuance and additional technical code requirements may be identified and changes to the originally submitted plans may be required. F1 FIRE CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): F2 ACCESS ROADWAY DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roadways shall have an unobstructed paved width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. CD1?rA8236MUP.res (5/11100) F6 GATES: All automatic gates across fire access roadways shall be equipped with a Fire Department approved emergency key operated switch that will override all command functions and open the gate. Gates accessing four (4) or more residential lots shall also be equipped with emergency traffic control activating strobe sensor(s) which will activate and open the gate upon the approach of emergency apparatus. All automatic gates shall be tested by the Fire Department prior to their being left in the closed position. Plans for all gates shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. F7 RESPONSE MAPS: Any development that by virtue of new structures necessitates fire hydrants, roadways, or similar features, shall be required to provide a map in a format compatible with current Department mapping services, and shall be charged a reasonable fee for updating all Fire Department response maps. F8 COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS: Prior to the delivery of combustible materials on the project site, water and sewer systems shall satisfactorily pass all required tests and be connected to the public water and sewer systems. In addition, the first lift of asphalt paving shall be in place to provide a permanent all- weather surface for emergency vehicles. Said access shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. F9 POSTING OF ROADWAYS: Emergency access roadways when required shall be properly identified as per Fire Department standards. F10 OBSTRUCTIONS (ACCESS ROADWAYS): All traffic lanes shall be a minimum of 24 feet in width during construction and shall be maintained clear and free of obstructions during construction in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. Flt FIRE HYDRANTS & FIRE FLOWS: The applicant shall provide fire hydrants of a type, number, and location satisfactory to the Encinitas Fire Department. A letter from the water agency serving the area shall be provided that states the required fire flow is available. Fire hydrants shall be of a bronze type. A two - sided blue reflective road marker shall be installed on the road surface to indicate the location of the fire hydrant for approaching fire apparatus. F12 FUEL MODIFICATION ZONES: The applicant shall provide and maintain fire /fuel breaks to the satisfaction of the Encinitas Fire Department. F13 ADDRESS NUMBERS: Address numbers shall be placed in a location that will allow them to be clearly visible from the street fronting the structure. The height of the address numbers shall conform to Fire Department Standards. CDRc/98236MUP.res (5i11100) F14 ADDRESS NUMBERS FOR STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF ROADWAY: Where structures are located off a roadway on long driveways, a monument marker shall be placed at the entrance where the driveway intersects the main roadway. Permanent address numbers with height conforming to Fire Department standards shall be affixed to this marker. F15 AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM: Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. E1 ENGINEERING CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): E2 All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of building/grading permit issuance shall apply. EGl GradineConditions EG3 The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. EG4 The grading for this project is defined in Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose responsibility it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing to ensure compliance of the work with the approved grading plan, submit required reports to the Engineering Services Director and verify compliance with Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. EG5 No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. EG7 All newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1. EG8 A soils/geological/hydraulicreport (as applicable) shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Such report shall be submitted and approved: Prior to building permit issuance /At first submittal of a grading plan, as applicable. EG 10 In accordance with Section 23.24.370 (A) of the Municipal Code, no grading permit shall be issued for work occurring between October 1 st of any year and April 15th of the following year, unless the plans for such work include details of protective measures, including desilting basins or other temporary drainage or control measures, or both, as may be deemed necessary by the field inspector to protect the adjoining public and private property from damage by erosion, flooding, or the CDRcA8236MUP.res (5111100) deposition of mud or debris which may originate from the site or result from such grading operations. EDl Drainaee Conditions ED2 The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and shall construct temporary desiltation/detentionbasins of type, size and location as approved by the Engineering Services Director. The basins and erosion control measures shall be shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or approved by the Engineering Services Director. The developer shall maintain the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a period of time satisfactory to the Engineering Services Director and shall guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the Engineering Services Director. ED3 A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water originating within the subdivision, and all surface waters that may flow onto the subdivision from adjacent lands, shall be required. Said drainage system shall include any easements and structures as required by the Engineering Services Director to properly handle the drainage. ED5 The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the final map for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan and City of Encinitas Standards as required by the Engineering Services Director. ED7 Concentrated flows across driveways and/or sidewalks shall not be permitted. ESl Street Conditions ES2 A registered Civil Engineer or a licensed land surveyor shall provide a signed statement that: "The existing private roads of access to the project are within the easements for the benefit of the project". ES4 Reciprocal access and/or maintenance agreements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives or parking areas and maintenance thereof to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director. MW98236MURres (5111100) ES5 Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, a right -of -way construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Director and appropriate fees paid, in addition to any other permits required. ES8 The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the Engineering Services Director prior to issuance of any grading or building permit for this project. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Encinitas Standards based on R -value tests. The standard improvement plan check deposit is required. EU1 Utilities EU2 The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective utility agencies regarding services to the project. EU3 The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G. & E., Pacific Telephone, and other applicable authorities. EU4 All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including existing utilities unless exempt by the Municipal Code. EU5 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation and underground ingof existing public utilities, as required. CD/tc/98236MUP.res (5/11/00) RECORDING REQUESTED BY: SLITY NATIONAL TITLE AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Fidelity National Title 1500 Walnut St., Ste. 300 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Attn: Eileen M. Christian, Esq. -71e, —z3� 01-0699972 ORDER NO. I THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY PUBLIC ROAD & PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT (Please fill in document title(S) on this line) M& docvcicM is ra: t:'i_tl to oe a true c, cl cc: relit hnr copy of the crigpnaI ddocuient remrded as nw mn: NoiL /� v-fca � d the County Recorder of San Di lyx County, ft THIS PAGE ADDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACE FOR RECORDING INFORMATION - (Additional Recording Fees Applies) Eileen M. Christian, Esq_ Recording Requested By: ) Fidelity National Title Insurance Company City of Encinitas ) 1500 Walnut Street, Suite 300 Philadelphia, PA 19102 When Recorded Mail to: ) (215) 875 -4141 FAX (215) 732 -6726 city Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 5o5 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92024 ) FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CTFY ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY PUBLIC ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT Assessor's Parcel No. 1-(0, Z ` 90 `?-0 Project No.: W.O. No.: Encinitas Heritage Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company hereinafter called GRANTOR, does hereby grant, convey and dedicate to the City of Encinitas, State of Califon a, hereinafter called GRANTEE, the easement for right -of -way and incidents thereto for public road purposes, public sewer, public storm drain and public utilities upon, under, over and across that certain real property in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows: THE SOUTHERLY 40.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: THE SOUTHERLY 610 FEET, OF THE EASTERLY 360 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN AFRNARDI'i IO MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF, BEING WITHIN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, (the "Easement ") (REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT iNTENTIONALLY BLANK) This Easement is subject to a Road Maintenance Agreement (DOC #1999 -08 179 1 8) ( "Road Maintenan" Agreeme!ti') which is incorporated herein by this reference. GRANTEE agrees to indemnify GRANTOR as provided in that certain easement agreement between GRANTOR, GRANTEE, and the Grauer Foundation for Education dated September 10, 2001. Dated this II day of $tom^" 14001 (OWNER and "GRANTOR'D Encinitas Heritage Partners, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company By: Som P Inc., a Delaware CZud—A. po ' n, sole member By: E Kubis, Senior Vice President STATE OF 1 t 4" ^ ) ss. COUNTY OF MeiM MS ) On� �3 2001, before mc, kn- 1� a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appealed Edward A. Kubis, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. wTTNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) 66P-1T -2001 ITZ fro% -RISK MAMA, I IT609432240 7-236 P.034 /046 c-42J This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by deed or grant to the City of Encirritaa, a Municipal Corporation, is hueby accepted by the undersigned agcm on behalf of thn City Council of the City of Encinitas pur.uant to authority conferred by Resolution of the City Council of the City of Encinitas adoptad on November 9, 1994 and the grantee consar& to recordation thereof by its duly authoruxd officer. Dated BY Leroy Bo Acting Director of Engineenng Services City of F,,ciruras SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, those parties concerned, desire to have the Deed of Trust recorded (ddfmm/yy) ll z-z Woo as File/Page No. D&38154- and modification of Deed of Trust recorded , as File/Page No. , subordinated to Easement for CityfLghway for PUBLIC ACCESS ROAD EASEMENT AND PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT ( "DOCUMENT" hereinafter). Now, therefore, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned BENEFICIARY or TRUSTEE hereby waives the priority of said Deed of Trust in favor of said DOCUMENT to the same extent as if said DOCUMENT had been executed prior to said Deed of Trust. BENEFIC TEE BY i s�.7r 57Re�T G .. w.rr- 7itlr Rsa ;,rTa..t u:« P.r :�•F..,,X" DATED I — 19 -p j BE. CIARY or T, RUST�£F��-' G2 QreS + CoU n5e Tide: � -�'rNe n s - DATED D . STATE OF } 55. COUNTY OF D CII\ h ) On � 2001, before me,�Q,�jA_WVnde7. . a Notary Public to and for said County and State, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatums on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. �` �`+r,� VERONICA MENDEZ WITNESS my hand and official seal. sT Notary Public ATFOFTExAs ��. e...` Mf' Comm. Fap. OS•D9 -2005 Signature - -- (Seal) STATL OF COUNTY OF ss. } On 2001, before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared personally known to me (of proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal- Signature (Seal) SEP -14 -01 13:Z8 fiom:Gl1ARANTI . RESID FIN 2143661666 T -620 P IT/19 Job -492 STATE OF ss. COUl,, fY OF On 2001, beforc mc,'�amn'ICA NP. A7- , 'Notary Public in and for said CourrTe and State, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrw'nent and acknowledged to me chat They execured the same in th> it authonmd capavivac, and Ibat b,f their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument. 1 N��ti VERONICA ME Notary Publ WITNESS my hand and official seal. STATE OF TE ~ %,��N� IMY Gomm. [ap. 09:2 5 Signature (Seal) STATE OF ) cotn,rTtroF h 1 ) �/ 2001, before rm, a�0 0 4- hl tC e ld� . a Notary Public in and for said on Cc Statc, persona appeared Etleer, 0.� ersottally known [a me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidcncc) to be the per5ons whos° names am subscribed to the within instruntcnt and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in rhea authorized capacities, and that by their signattuts on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons anted, executed the Instrument. NOTARIAL SEAL Wl 1ESS hand and Official sefll_ KAIMOC A MIKELSOt9, Notary pubac Ctry of pn,taaebMa w 4a County Cemmtaa,on al k!3 JW 29, 2002 Signature (Seal) EASEMENT AGREEMENT This Easement Agreememt dated as of Septemba lo, 2001 (the "Agreement', is by and between Encinitas Heritage Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company C'EHP , the Grauer Fotndatoq for Education, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the "Foundation"), and the City of Encinitas, a municipal corporation orZanized under the laws of the State of California ("City"). RECTI'ALS WHEREAS, the Foundation owns the real property located at the southwest corner a El Camino Real and Tennis Club Drive, Encinitas, California (APN. 262 -160 -17) WHEREAS, the Foundation desires to improve the Foundation Land with structures, Parking facilities, and related improvements; and WHEREAS, EHP owns the real property located at the northwest corner of El Camino Real and Terris Chib Drive, Encinitas, California (APN: 262 - 08(t-20) (the "THP Land ") which BHP Land is adjacent to the Foundation Land; and WHEREAS the E11P Land contains a portion of a private road which is commonly (mown as 'Tennis Club Drive" which portion is more fully described on Exhibit "A" (the "Rnad") which is snarbed hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, providing access to the EHP Iand and to parcels adjacent to and west of the EHP Land not including the Foundation Land, and WHEREAS, the Road is subject to a Road Maintenance Agreement (DOC+t1 999-08 1 791 8) ( "Road Maintenance Agreement") which is attached hereto as Exhibit `B" and made a pan hereof by this, ieference;and WHEREAS, the Foundation obtained approval for a school facility (Approval No 01 016 M, U ?MOD/DR/CDP/ETA) from City subject to conditiom including Specific Condition SCA of Encinitas planning Commission Resolution PC2001.33, requiring the Foundation to obtain permanent legal access to dhe Foundation Land; and WHEREAS, the Road is situated along the north border of dte Foundation Land and if made available for permanent use by the Foundation Land would be a suitable road for permanent legal access to the Foundation Land and would satisfy Specific Condition SCA of Encinitas PI- ming, Commission Resolution PC2001 -33, as ser forth above, and WHEREAS, for various reasons, EHP is willing to convey an easement to City for 'public road purposes" whereupon the general public, including, without limitation. the Foundation and its employees, vendors, guests, invitees, and licensees, would gain rights to use the Road (the "Easement"). The form of said Easement is attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Fouuidanum is willing to pay compensation (as set forth in paragraph 3.1, below) to FHP and to be bound by the Road Maintenance Agreement to Order ro imduce EHP to convey the aforesaid Easement to the City; and WHEREAS, City desires to accept the Easement subject to certain corm and conditions. TERMS NOW, THEREFORE, m comderarton of the respective covenants and promises contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties within agree as follows_ I . Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the conveyance of a public road easement to City for the benefit of public roadway access and to satisfy Specific Condition SCP, of Encinitas Planning Commission Resolution PC2001 -33- 2. Duties of I'tiP. EHP shall grant and convey the Easement to the City in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "D" at no cost to the City and subject to the terms contained herein. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement. EHP shall execine the Easement and deposit such executed Lase_.^ z into escrow. 3. Duties of City. City shall accept the Easement in the form attached as Exhibit "D" and upon acceptance of the Easement City shall mdeawrfy, defend, and hold EHP harmless from and against any and all liability related to the use of the Easement for public road purposes excepting therefrom only liability arising art of any negligent act or omission or the willful misconduct of Efiv 4. Duties of Foundation. 4.1 pIrtim by Foundatiom Upon execution of this Agreement and sub;W to City's acceptance of the Easement, the Foundation shall pay to EHP Seveuty -Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000) according to the following payment schedule. a. 555,000 upon the City's formal acceptance of the Easement. and b. 510,000 on the brst (111) anniversary of the City's formal acceptance of the Easement. and C. 510,000 on the second (2nd) anniversary of the City's formal sceeptartm of the Easement To facilitate such payments, the parties hereto shall establish an escrow ("Escrow") with the National Division of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company in Philadelphia, Pemsylvaoia (" Fidelity'l. All costs of the Escrow shall be the tespoosibility of the Foundation. Promptly after this Agreement has been fully executed by the parties. this document sball be deposited along with the Restrictive Covenant (as hereinafter def fide and the Easement in the Escrow and the Foundation shall simultaneously place vemied b Thousand Dollars (555,000) in the Escrow. The Escrow shall be go y instructions executed by EHP and the Foundation and which ate acceptable to Fidelity. The escrow instructions at a minimum shall provide that (i) documents evidencctg the conveyance of the Easement shall be recorded among the Official Records of San Diego Cotmty and that the aforesaid $55,000 shall be disbursed to EHF immediately after the Easement is accepted by City; (ii) the Restrictive Covens shall be recorded as provided in Section 4.3 hereof; and (iii) should the City not accept the Easement the aforesaid $55,000 shall be returned to the Fotmdaion, mints the payment of fees and eases as set forth in Section 4.4 below. The remaining Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000) of the consideration shall be Paid outside of escrow as provided in paragraphs 4 -h(b) and 4 1(c), above. 4.2 lttamtenInce Agreement. Upon acceptance of the Easement by City, Foundaticm agrees to be bound by the terms of the Road Maintenance Agreement which 29eement shall obligate the Foundation to pay its pro-rata portion of the costs of maintaining the portion of the Road subject to the Easement. As part of its obligatiosts under the Road Maintenance Ageerneut, the Foundatiom shall reimburse such party or parties entitled to reimbursement under the Road Maintenance Ap ==W within thirty (30) days from receipt of an invoice from such party or Parnea detailing the costs incurred and the Foundation's pro-rata portion thereof. 4.3 Restric+ions- Upon acceptance of the Easement by the City, Fidelity shall record among the official Records of San Diego County that tesmctive covenant ("Restncnve Covenant ") which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a plan hereof by dus refcreate. The Foundation- Shall provide evidence to EHP and Fidelity sufficient to allow Fidelity to issue title insurance coverage to EILP insuring that the Restrictive Covenant is superior, on the date of its recordation to all encumbrances on the Foundation Ian& 4.4 Pa tit of Fees and Expenses The Foundation shall reimburse EHP the reasonable costs incurred by EHP for the Preparation of this Agreement and the conveyance of the Easement The Foundation shall also be responsible for all reasonable costs incurred by EHP which are associated with the conveyance of the Easement. in addition, the Foundation shall Pay for an endorsement or other iasu mein Issued by Fidelity instating the Restrictive Covenant. EHP shaU keep the Foundation regularly informed of all quotations of fees and expenses it receives prior to mcurring such costs and shall upon request by the Foundation, provide a running balance of fees and expenses insured as of the date of such request. 4.5 City Notific is non. City shall promapdY notify FHP of its acceptance of the Easement. 5. Ye_pMsentanons and Warranties 5.1 Representations and Waaanties of EHP. EHP represents and warrants the following: t. hHP previously purchased a policy of title insurance showing EHP as the owner in fee of the E13P Land, imchKbM, wrthaut limitation, the land upon which the Road is located. The exectrion, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the conveyance of the Easement will nor, to the best of EHP's knowledge, violate any contractual obligation, security agteemem, tristrurnecir, decd of trust, easement. license or other tmdertakmg by which PHP is bound. b. EH? (and the Person Of persons signing this Agreement loon behalf of EHP) has all requisite legal power and authority, gal right, to make, deliver and perform this Agreement and to convey the Fasemem, and has taken all necessary corporate, partnership of company actin (as the case may be) to authorize the executiOn, delivery anwith ranee or this Agreement. 1Jo crmsent or =honzation of, filing aired in other act by or in respect of any Other Person or entity is re4 co®eetio+t with the actions to be taken hereunder or with respect to the execution, delivery, performance, validity or enforceability of this Agreement which has not been taken. 5.2 Rge mscntarions and Warratdies of Foundation. Foundation represents and wetrants the following: a. Foundation (and the person or persons signing this Agreement on behalf of the Foundation) has all requisite legal power and authority, and the legal right to make dt9iver and Perform this Agreement a� has taken ell necessary corporate, partnership or company action (as the case may be) to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. No consent or authorization of, filing with, notice to or odes act by or in respect of any other person or entity is required in connection with the actions to be taken hereunder or with respect to the execution, delivery, performance, validity or enforceability of this Agreement. 6 Gmetal Terms, 6 1 Amendments. This Agreement shall not be amended except by a written W3m10eg1 signed by all Parties hereto. 6.2 Governing Law and Jurisdiction. This Agreement and all matters relating thereto shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California Foundation, EHP (together with their respective members), and City each hereby submit to the jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in Califomra 6.3 Savi Clause. Invalidation of any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement shall in no way affect any of the other provisions hereof, wbich shall remain in full form and effect 6A Integration. This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding and agtnemetrcbetweeq the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. 6.5 Recitals. The recitak hereof are made an integral pan of this Agreement. 6.6 Recordation. In no event shall evidence of the conveyance of the Easement be recorded in any public records unless the Restrictive Coveeeut has been recorded prior thereto or is being recorded simultaneously therewith (RFJAALVDER OF PAGE LEFT DiTENTIONALLY BLANK) 6.7 Exectaioa by Facsimile and in Coun_tu ails.. For the converumce of the psrves and to facilitate execution, this Agreement tray be executed by fttesimile aid in two or more counterparts, amb of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same document. k67:ua1ri� Legal Description (the "Road') RRAIIIT " A' THE SOUTHERLY 4000 FEET OF THE FOLLOWI.YG DL'SCnBD PROFEM; THE SOUTFmLY 61u vUT, OF THE EASTERLY 160 PEST OF THE SOVTHFA4T QUARTEit OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SBCFION 23. TOWNSM 13 SOUISL RANGE 4 WEST. SAN BERMARDM MPRMLAN. ACOORD WO YO UNrrED STATES OOVFYINNWNT SURVEY THEREOF. BUNG wrrmN THE CITY OF FNcINrrAs. COUNTY OF SAN MOO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXC@PTTNG JIFItEFROM ALL THAT P 1MON LYING WMIKN PL CAMINO REAL. AS SHOWN ON SAID ROAD SURVEY 1102. - - -- �oa+a erLOwr z r 1 1 I t 1 1 b s: �i mr ass ( 1 Nk aaas 1 1 1 i ,Yk 2ML-AIH7 }1 1 1 1 - - -- �oa+a erLOwr z r 1 1 I t 1 1 b RUG -15 -2001 12:42 ,CO ENGINEERING P.01 r PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH. CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259-4812 Fax Cover Sheet DATE: -M 2001 REGARDING: 6r4Ver E_djLi -rOn Number of pages transmitted ( including cover sheet): — PLEASE DELIVER TO: NAME: Dijanc T, ornDSBrI COMPANY: CI v n� EnG,n "d< PHONE NO: FAX NO: 100)(033-zd 18 Za /U WAYNE A. PASCO R.C.E. 29577 D Gr dv n �` I ✓��A�" Message: „ DrO f1 SaorM If you have any problems with this copy or did not receive all of the pages, please call, THANK YOU, `� I This transmission is sent by: �) tis�111 The materials enclosed with this facsimile transmission are private and confidential and are the property of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile transmission in error, please immediately notify us by telephone to arrange for return of the forwarded documents to us. RUG -15 -2001 10:42 -",CO ENGINEERING Recording Requested By: When Recorded Mail to: City Clerk CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 For the benefit of the City SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE REAL PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC STORM DRAIN EASEMENT REQUIRED AS CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF CASE NO. 01 -016 MUPMOD/DR/CDP/EIA Assessor's Parcel No. 262- 160 -17 Project No. : W.O. No.: 7065 -G GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY THIS REFERENCE, Which is commonly known as Vacant Lot: SW Comer of El Camino Real and Tennis Club Drive . A.P.N. 262 - 160 -17 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter). In consideration of the approval of Grading Plan N 7065 -G P.22 by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER (S) hereby make(s) an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication, for the benefit of CITY, of the hereinafter described real property for Public Storm Drain Easement. The real property referred to above is situated in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, and is more particularly described as follows' SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HERETO BY THIS REFERENCE. RUG -15 -2001 10:43 -USCG ENGINEERING P.03 DRAFT OWNER for himself, his successors and assigns, hereby waives claim for any and all damages to OWNER'S remaining property contiguous to the storm drain easement hereby conveyed by reason of the location, construction, landscaping or maintenance of said Public Story Drain Easement. This Offer of Dedication is made pursuant to Section 7050 of the Government Code of the State of California and may be accepted at any time by CITY. This Offer of Dedication may be terminated and the right to accept the offer may be abandoned in accordance with the summary vacation procedures in Section 8300 et seq. of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California_ The termination and abandonment may be made by CITY. This Offer of Dedication shall be irrevocable and shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. At time of acceptance of this offer any and all trust deed(s) and easement(s) shall be subordinated to this Offer of Dedication. OWNER agrees that OWNER'S duties and obligations under this Offer of Dedication are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the tax bill of OWNER any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Offer of Dedication. -2- RUG -15 -2001 10:43 PRSCO ENGINEERING P.04 DRAFT If either OWNER or CITY is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Offer of Dedication, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. CITY may assign to persons impacted by the performance of this Offer of Dedication the right to enforce this Offer of Dedication against OWNER. Dated Dated Owner: Signature of OWNERS must be notarized. Attach the appropriate acknowledgement. I certify on behalf of the City Council of the City of Encinitas, pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution of said Council adopted on November 9, 1994 that the City of Encinitas consents to the making of the foregoing Irrevocable Offer of dedication and consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date: By: Alan D. Archibald Director of Engineering Services -3- AUG -15 -2001 10:43 - ",CO ENGINEERING P.05 DRAFT SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT Whereas, those parties concerned, desire to have the Deed of Trust recorded as file/page No. , subordinated to Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate Real Property For Public R/W ("DOCUMENT" hereinafter) Required As Condition of Approval of ; NOW, therefore, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned BENEFICIARY OR TRUSTEE hereby waives the priority of said Deed of Trust in favor of said DOCUMENT to the same extent as if said DOCUMENT had been executed prior to said Deed of Trust. DATED DATED BENEFICIARY OR TRUSTEE Title: BENEFICIARY OR TRUSTEE Un Title: Signature of BENEFICIARY or trustee to be notarized. Attach the appropriate Acknowledgement. I certify on behalf of the City Council of the City of Encinitas, pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution of said Council adopted on November 9, 1994 that the City of Encinitas consents to the making of the foregoing Subordination Agreement, and consents to the making of the foregoing Subordination Agreement, and consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date By Alan D. Archibald Director of Engineering Services M11! AUG -15 -2001 10:44 POSCO ENGINEERING EXMBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL l OF PARCEL MAP NO. 2162 IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1973 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY. AUG -15 -2001 10:44 "^SCO ENGINEERING P.07 SHEET 1 OF 2 EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OVER, UNDER, ALONG, AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 2162 IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1973 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1 BEING ALSO THE CENTERLINE OF EL CAMINO REAL (126.00 FFET WIDE) AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP 2162; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 N89 013'47 "W (N89 °56' 16 "W RECORD) 63.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE SIDELINE OF EL CAMINO REAL NORTH 00 039'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 113.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH LEAVING SAID SIDELINE 89°20'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15 04922" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 54.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 051'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 17.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20°1731'• WEST, A DISTANCE OF 16.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °46'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 44.96 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE SOUTH 89 013'47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 57.24 FEET; TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. F. Y� U i"ypL- 3o�3'�' No. 5211 RUG -15 -2001 10:45 r"SCO ENGINEERING EXHIBIT 'B' IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION P.08 SKEET 2 OF 21 Z SCALE. 1" =100' -�. 21 " I u, I :r 4 � '`.. uc L�� •rl War- May TOTAL P.08 F/ /y�pf .¢GCS f O!� Tf1� G•ef��ie SCh�o c 4�E�f/ laws- 'o ,�Lsd ,�o�tv -rat 70 7� �"IOCA,eE e.v o� s�}s E,9sc err �° � G7�f ��(JG �°��•�J �ssv,•¢�rlGE - Tb t-ov �{.9ti� �s fioUGD - GESok PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 To: City of Encinitas Planning Department WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: Attached ❑ Under separate cover THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Date: 8/9/2001 Job No. PE 789G Attn: Tom Curriden Re: Grauer Foundation for Education Open space Easement 1 11 Copies Date No. Description I 3 Open space legal description with plat l 5 Closure Report Tom - Attached per Stuart Grauer's request is the most current open space easement as submitted to the Engineering Dept. I believe this will be the final draft. I have also attached the closure report to verify the total acreage included within the easement as required by the Conditions of Approval (1.84 actual vs. 1.83 required). Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thanks. Justin (858)259- 8212x106 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ❑ For approval For your use As requested ❑ For review and comment REMARKS: t 1111 I!!►M IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIh R=Z' ki I Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N. Highway 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259-8212 Thu Jul 19 11:28:22 2001 PC L A - _-- _- - - - -__ PROJECT: \\Server\job files \789gp.pro PT# NORTH EAST ELEV DESCRIPTION CURVE DATA BEARING DISTANCE INVERSE SET 55184.05 52973.29 10 11 64 63 41 268 PT 266 PC NO 39'31 "E S89 08'40 "E S8 42'39 "W S72 46123 11W RADIUS POINT: RADIUS: DELTA: DEG OF CURVATURE: ARC LENGTH: CHORD LENGTH: CHORD BEARING: TANGENT LENGTH: MIDDLE ORDINATE: EXTERNAL: RADIUS POINT: RADIUS: DELTA: DEG OF CURVATURE: ARC LENGTH: CHORD LENGTH: CHORD BEARING: TANGENT LENGTH: MIDDLE ORDINATE: EXTERNAL: RADIUS POINT: RADIUS: DELTA: DEG OF CURVATURE: ARC LENGTH: CHORD LENGTH: CHORD BEARING: TANGENT LENGTH: MIDDLE ORDINATE: EXTERNAL: 479.25ft 240.24ft 80.98ft 55663.27 52978.80 55659.68 53219.01 55579.63 53206.75 47.28ft 55565.63 36 55479.58 90.00ft 69 19'54" LEFT 63 39'43" ARC DEFINITION 108.91ft 102.38ft S38 18'12 "W 62.24ft 15.98ft 19.42ft 55485.29 265 55408.35 491.79ft 20 08'01" LEFT 11 39'02" ARC DEFINITION 172.81ft 171.92ft S1 03'57"E 87.31ft 7.57ft 7.69ft 53161.59 53187.95 53098.14 53583.86 55313.40 53101.33 Y . 256 55315.77 53206.97 M�� QN C (' G 105.66ft 0 ,�• j,, 62 27'49" LEFT 54 13'32" ARC DEFINITION ;U 115.19ft N .;211 109.57ft GtOG 3a•o :r S32 31'01 "E 64.07ft 15.31ft �L'it1!��• 17.91ft Pasco Engin, ing, Inc. 535 N. High 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Thu Jul 19 11:28:23 2001 • PROJECT: \ \Server \job files \789gp.pro -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PTO NORTH EAST ELEV DESCRIPTION CURVE DATA BEARING DISTANCE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 57 55221.00 53160.23 PC SO 46113 "W 39.46ft 246 55181.55 53159.70 N89 13147 11W 186.43ft 10 55184.05 52973.29 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1470.55ft TOTAL PERIMETER AREA: 74144.86 SQ FT 1.70 ACRES " 4 Pasco En_ Bering, Inc. 535 N. Highway 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Thu Jul 19 11:28:23 2001 PA f: C C L B PROJECT: \ \Server \job files \789gp.pro PT# NORTH EAST ELEV DESCRIPTION CURVE DATA BEARING DISTANCE --------"'--- ----------------___------------ --- ------------------------------ INVERSE SET 4386 55655.83 53476.79 N89 08'37 "W 100.25ft 4377 55657.33 53376.55 S1 37'13 "W 53.59ft 277 55603.77 53375.04 PC RADIUS POINT: 276 55862.88 53335.02 RADIUS: 262.18ft DELTA: 19 32137" RIGHT DEG OF CURVATURE: 21 51'13" ARC DEFINITION ARC LENGTH: 89.43ft CHORD LENGTH: 89.00ft CHORD BEARING: N89 00131 "W TANGENT LENGTH: 45.15ft MIDDLE ORDINATE: 3.80ft EXTERNAL: 3.86ft 290 55605.31 53286.05 PC RADIUS POINT: 286 55632.85 53268.57 RADIUS: 27.66ft DELTA: 58 47'57" RIGHT DEG OF CURVATURE: 207 08'24" ARC DEFINITION ARC LENGTH: 28.39ft CHORD LENGTH: 27.16ft CHORD BEARING: N55 22410 "W TANGENT LENGTH: 15.59ft MIDDLE ORDINATE: 3.56ft EXTERNAL: 4.09ft 296 55620.74 53263.71 PC RADIUS POINT: 295 55627.17 53309.45 RADIUS: 46.19ft DELTA: 51 16'44" RIGHT DEG OF CURVATURE: 124 02'53" ARC DEFINITION ARC LENGTH: 41.34ft CHORD LENGTH: 39.97ft CHORD BEARING: N17 38106 "E TANGENT LENGTH: 22.17ft MIDDLE ORDINATE: 4.55ft EXTERNAL: 5.04ft 297 55658.83 53275.82 PT S89 08'43 "E 100.75ft 4377 55657.33 53376.55 S89 08137 "E 100.25ft 4386 55655.83 53476.79 Pasco Engine ing, Inc. 535 N. High 101, Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 Thu Jul 19 11:28:23 2001 PROJECT: \ \Server \job files \789gp.pro PTN NORTH EAST ELEV DESCRIPTION CURVE DATA BEARING DISTANCE ------------------------------------------------- --- --- ------ ----- -- ----- ------- 513.99ft TOTAL PERIMETER AREA: 6005.50 SQ FT 0.14 ACRES EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OPENSPACE EASEMENT AN EASEMENT FOR OPENSPACE PURPOSES OVER, UNDER, ALONG, AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 2162 IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 1973 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE N0 039'31 "E 479.25 FEET (NO 002'55" W 479.18 FEET RECORD); THENCE S89 008'40 "E (S89 050'54 "E RECORD) 240.24 FEET; THENCE SO8 042'39 "W 80.98 FEET; THENCE S72 °46'23 "W 47.28 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 90.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, A RADIALLY LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS N17 °01'51 "W; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 108.91 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 69 °19'54" TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 491.79 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY, A RADIALLY LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS N80 °59'56 "W; THENCE SOUTHERLY 172.81 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20 008'01" TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 105.66 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIALLY LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS S88 °42'53 "W; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 115.19 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 62027'49"; THENCE NON - TANGENT TO SAID CURVE S00 046' 13 "W 39.46 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE N89 °13'47 "W (N89 °56' 16W RECORD) 186.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Fv N C. Y G\ � � o i No. 5211 P � �(.IFOs � PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1 BEING ALSO THE CENTERLINE OF EL CAMINO REAL (126.00 FFET WIDE) AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP 2162; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 N89 008'40 "W (N89 °50'54 "W RECORD) 100.25 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S01 °37' 13 "W 53.59 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 262.18 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIALLY LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS S08 °46'49 "E; THENCE WESTERLY 89.43 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19 °32'37" TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 27.66 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIALLY LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS S5 °13'5 1 "W; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 28.39 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 047'57" TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 46.19 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY, A RADIALLY LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS S81 °59'45 "W; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 41.34 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51 016'44" TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE S89 008'40 "E 100.75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL "C" VEGETATION CORRIDOR AN EASEMENT FOR A VEGETATION CORRIDOR OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE NORTHERLY 60.00 FEET OF SAID PARCEL 1. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ACCESS DRIVE TO TENNIS CLUB DRIVE AND ASSOCIATED GRADINGMAPROVEMENTS, AT THE MINIMUM WIDTH REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, ENTRY GATE POSTS, AND THE PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN. AS DESCRIBED IN CONDITION "SCD" OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC 2000 -30 PASSED AND ADOPTED ON MAY 25, 2000 0 Q Z, w e EXHIBIT "B " OPENSPACE AND VEGETA T ION EASEMENT 4 I Q TOVIS LLLB DRIVE RIVATEI 589'0840'E 435.05' 19491' _63.00'- 24024' ! `� 100.75' 3725 60.00' WILD 1� ORSq SPACE VEGETATION CO UDO4 PCL C" . FCL 6 lklf C3 A 59'1954" /¢�2 r?'Qi'l A=108-91'1 R�0.00 �+�yc, ' J SPACE 2145 T L y l EASENIVT ljy r� _ PLL A - d?I -- $ L G 20 '0B Dl' PARCEL 1 P.M. 2162 µ' A= 172.81' R= 491.79' I ` fne 2 'E Sffl F53 R= 105.66' A= 115.19' A 62 2749' �% I 186.43' -J 248.62' NB9'13'47N 435.05' LINE LINE Bb L% DISTANLE L1 M�0'46'13 39.46' 4134' N72 '46 237E 4728' L3 AW4239 80.98' L4 S0137'13 5359' LINE DEL TA AFC RUM Cl 51,16'44' 4134' 45.19' C2 58'4757" 28.39' 27.66' C3 19'3237" 89.43' 262.18' 1 63' 1 63' g n N PE789 JUL 3 0 1001 BONDING COST ESTIMATE FOR: Grading Plan: Southwest Corner of El Camino Real and Tennis Club Drive GP Drawing No. 7065 -G W9091410101111676141 Grauer Foundation for Education PE789G PREPARED BY: PASCO ENGINEERING, INC 535 N. HIGHWAY 101, SI TTE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 GF�f��ili:�71 REVISED 7/24/2001 6 '-- f Ru' 71/ 0/d WAYNE A CO, RCE 29577 1 DA , . GP DRAWING No.7065 -G PE 789G PRIVATE GRADING AND DRAINAGE BOND ESTIMATE 07/30/2001 CITY OF ENCINTTAS ITEM OTY UNIT A UNIT PRICE TOTAL GRADING: EXCAVATION/EMBANKMENT T PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS 6" PCC CURB & GUTTER, G -2 p 4" AC PAVING 6" TREATED BASE PCC BROW DITCH PER D-75 PVC DRAIN PIPE 12 "x12" AREA DRAIN p I TYPE G CATCH BASIN PER D -8 TYPE F CATCH BASIN PER D-7 RIP RAP PER D-40 TYPE C RETAINING WALL 36" PVC STANDPIPE PCC GUTTER 24" x 24" BROOKS BOX AC SIDEWALK HYDROCARTRIDGE FILTER 7,900 CY @ $4.10 $32,390.00 $1,420.00 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 EA @ $500.00 SUBTOTAL= $32,390.00 SUBTOTAL= 10% CONTINGENCIES= $3,239.00 $500.00 TOTAL= $35,629.00 1797 LF @ $13.75 $24,708.75 39300 SF @ $1.65 $64,845.00 42900 SF @ $0.90 $38,610.00 547 LF @ $13.65 $7,466.55 995 LF Q $37.00 $36,815.00 12 EA @ $50.00 $600.00 1 EA @ $3,700.00 $3,700.00 3 EA @ $3,400.00 $10,200.00 5 CY Q $150.00 $750.00 1650 SF @ $28.00 $46,200.00 1 EA @ $500.00 $500.00 630 SF @ $5.00 $3,150.00 1 EA @ $500.00 $500.00 2600 SF @ $3.65 $9,490.00 2 EA @ $1,000.00 $2,000.00 SUBTOTAL= $249,535.30 10% CONTINGENCIES= $24,953.53 TOTAL= $274,488.83 HYDROSEED 28,000 SF @ $0.11 $3,080.00 GRAVEL BAGS 710 EA @ $2.00 $1,420.00 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 EA @ $500.00 $500.00 SUBTOTAL= $5,000.00 10% CONTINGENCIES= $500.00 TOTAL= $5,500.00 GRAND TOTAL= $315,617.83 BONDING COST ESTIMATE FOR: Improvement Plan: El Camino Real PREPARED FOR: JUU) MAY 2 2 2001 Grauer Foundation for PE789G PREPARED BY: PASCO ENGINEERING, INC 535 N. HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 05/25/2001 A. No.29577 Exp. 3131/03 WAX1qE A. PASCO, RCE 29577 DATE PE789G 05/25/2001 IP DRAWING No. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BOND ESTIMATE CITY OF ENCINITAS PPEM QTY UNIT 0 UNIT PRICE TOTAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMEENT 6" PCC CURB & GUT. (G -2) 4" AC PAVING 6" CLASS II BASE SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT REMOVE EXIST. AC BERM 500 LF @ $13.75 $6,875.00 7200 SF @ $1.65 $11,880.00 7200 SF @ $0.90 $6,480.00 500 LF @ $3.00 $1,500.00 500 LF @ $3.00 $1,500.00 SUBTOTAL= $28,235.00 10% CONTINGENCIES= $2,823.50 GRAND TOTAL = $31,058.50 The Grauer Foundation for Education 0 JAN 16 2002 January 15, 2002 City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: Construction Bond and Cash Security Partial - Release Bond No. 125919 (IP Drawing No. 7065 -1) Bond No. 125920 (GP Drawing No. 7065 -G) By this letter we hereby requests a 75% release of the subject bonds and associated cash securities. The work associated with the subject bonds in now substantially complete with final completion anticipated by months end. Thank you and please do not hesitate to call should there be any questions regarding our request. jSi erel y, tuart Grauer President 1500 South El Camino Real • Encinitas, CA 92024 (760) 944 -6777 • fax (760) 944 -6784 • E1N 4 33- 0708902 TRANSMITTAL FORM City of Encinitas FAX 760/633 -2818 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Engineering Encinitas, CA 920243633 760/633 -2770 DATE '2-5- 15- (f>1 SEND TO FAX #: 944-45,50— NO. OF PAGES:_ TO: r I MI SS) PA S-- AA E Q- OF: ADDRESS: FROM: Y`^ hRk �� NE/�L PHONE: (760)633-?-&>3') ❑ Call ASAP ❑ Review & Call ❑ Please Handle ❑ Per Our Conversation • I 1 ❑ Review & Reft m ❑ F.Y.I. ❑ Please Reply by ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City Capital Improvement Projects Distnd Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment(Stommater Compliance Subdivision Engineenng Traffic Engineering 16 August, 2001 Grauer Foundation for Education 2210 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 c/o David C. Meyer, DCM Properties, Inc. Re: "Grauer School, El Camino Real & Tennis Club Dr. Grading Application 7065 GR Improvement Application 7065IR A.P.N. 262 - 160 -17 Permit issuance requirements This correspondence shall serve to briefly summarize the Engineering Permit process. Drawings 7065 -G, 7065 -I and the corresponding checkprints and draft documents have been submitted to this department and are subject to approval by the Director of Engineering Services.. Upon approval, the plans will remain valid for three years. In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per these Drawings, you will need to satisfy the following requirements: In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per these Drawings, you will need to satisfy the following requirements: (1) Ensure that the subject property has legal access over Tennis Club Drive (2) Obtain approval of drawing number 7065 -G and 7065 -I, and provide 4 blueline prints of all approved drawings. (3) Provide 2 copies each of the Soil Report titled Geotechnical Investigation, Alzheimers Care Facility, El Camino Real and Tennis Club Drive dated October 30, 1998 and update letter titled Geotechnical Update for the Grauer Foundation for Education dated July 13, 2001 by Sladden Engineering. (4) Post Security Deposits as follows: (a)GRADING PERMIT 7065GI... in the amount of $315.618.00 to guarantee performance of earthwork, site retaining walls, private road and sidewalk improvements, and erosion control, (b)IMPROVEMENT PERMIT 706511... in the amount of $31,059.00 to guarantee performance of public roadway improvements, Up to 80% of the amount in 3(a) may be in the form of a Performance Bond, and 100% of the amount in 3(b), 31c) and 3(d) may be in the form of a Performance Bond issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Twenty percent of the amount in 3(a) must be in the form of cash, certificates of deposit, a letter of credit, or an assignment of account, any of which may be used for the full amount. Any financial instrument's format is subject to approval. 14) Pay non - refundable Inspection Fees and Inspection Deposits, the latter subject to cost recovery and only applicable to Sewer Construction Permits, respectively, as follows: G:1Bond & Fee & Rclea a Letters \BOND AND FEE LETTERS\grauecdoc TEL 760 - 633 -2600 1 FAX 760 - 633 -1627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TDD 760 - 633.2700 Tl� recycled paper Permit Type Permit No. Amount GRADING 7065GI $15,780.00 IMPROVEMENT 706511 $1,553.00 FLOOD CONTROL FEES Electrical $9,497.00 PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 7065 PE $250.00 (5) The flood control fee is assessed at a rate of $0.21 /SF of impervious surface area as created per the approved plans, including but not limited to the paved private streets, and paved private driveways. An additional assessment will be levied on the structure(s) during the building permit process. (6) Provide the name, address, telephone number, and state license number and type of the construction contractor. Construction of public improvements is restricted to qualified contractors. Depending on the work to be done, the contractor will need to possess as follows either a valid: Type Description Work to be Done A Genera/ Engineering any & all C -8 Concrete apron /curb/ utter /ram /sidewalk C -10 Electrical lighting/signals C -12 Grading & Paving any surface, certain drain - basins /channels C -27 Landscaping lantin /irri ation /fencin & other amenities C -29 Masonry retaining walls C -32 Parkin &Hi Highway Improvement si na a /stri in Isafet C -34 Pipeline f sanitary sewer /storm drain state license, and meet the minimum insurance requirements as stated on the accompanying handout. The subdivider(s) is also obligated to provide proof of insurance, which should meet the criteria in the handout as well in the executed covenants regarding improvements. (7) Provide a work schedule per Municipal Code 23.24.200. Due to the scale of your project, a schedule itemizing work to be done and when, using a bar chart that shows the occurrence of each item with respect to each other, would be preferable. The proper allotment of construction inspection services is dependent on a reasonably accurate schedule. (8) Sign the Permits, Right -of -way Standard Conditions, and the Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreement Consent Statement, the latter of which must be signed by the property owner(s) of record, the others by an authorized representative. Permits are valid for no more than one year and may expire earlier due to expirations on letters of credit and/or insurance policies. Once the Engineering Permits are issued, advance notice of 48 flours must be given prior to you or your contractor scheduling the mandatory pre- construction conference. For more detail, especially on whose attendance is needed, and as a reminder, see Grading Notes #8 (7065 -G) and #9 (7065 -G), Improvement Notes #14 (7065 -I) and #15 (7065 -1), and Sewer Note #11. Additionally, the attendance of the Project G:tBond & Fee & Release LetterslBOND AND FEE LETTERSIgrauer.doc Planner will be required. Informal phasing of the project may necessitate more than one such conference. A separate Right -of -way Construction Permit will be required for any work in the public right -of -way or any public easement, existing or to be dedicated per the Final Map, that is not shown on the approved Drawings. Typically, this work may include excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install electric, gas, telephone, and cable television lines, and set their vaults and pedestals. A Permit Fee of 2$ 50.00 per application, and a site plan, preferably the work order issued by the public utility, will be required. The contractor license and insurance requirements will remain unchanged. Permits must be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the start of work. Excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install certain public utilities, namely, potable water, reclaimed water, and sanitary sewer, in the public right -of -way may be included within the scope of the Improvement Permit(s) given the contractor is the same. Securing and inspection of pipe and pipe zone are within the jurisdiction of the Special Districts concerned, the Olivenhain Municipal Water District, secured and permitted separately, and Cardiff Sanitation District. Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division. A Traffic Control Plan, acceptable to the Traffic Engineering Division, will be required prior to the start of any work within the existing and improved El Camino Real right -of -way. A typical plan shows all delineation, tapering, advance signage, temporary striping, barricades, and flagman positions, and provides a schedule of operations. For more detail, contact Raymond Guarnes, Engineering Technician, at (760) 633 -2704. Pursuant to Fire Department rules and regulations, prior to any combustible materials being placed on- site, all new roads shall have received their first lift of asphalt paving. Construction changes, prepared by the Engineer of Work, should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department as redlined mark -ups on 3 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposits. As- builts of Drawings 7065 -G and 7065 -I, prepared by the Engineer of Work and approved by the Engineering Services Department, will be required prior to Final (Grading) and (Improvement) Acceptance Inspections. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposit assigned to any Grading Permit. Satisfactory conclusion of Acceptance Inspections and formal acceptance by the City Council is a prerequisite to a 75% reduction in the Security Deposits guaranteeing performance of public road, drainage, trail, and sewer improvements, and start of the mandatory one -year Warranty Periods. The retentions shall be held for the duration of the Warranty Periods and will be released only after the satisfactory completion of the respective Warranty Inspection. Warranty Inspections cannot be scheduled until after the expiration of the respective Warranty Period. Additional engineering requirements will be forthcoming during any Building Permit process, including, but not necessarily limited to, coordination of the building site plan with a rough and precise grading plan, resolution of any outstanding public improvement issues, and assessment and collection of flood control, sanitary sewer, and traffic mitigation fees. GABond & Fee & Release Leer lBOND AND FEE LETTERS \gra=r.dm This letter does not change subdivider or successor -in- interest obligations per the proposed Map. If there should be a substantial delay in the start of your project, please request an update. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2839, or you may wish to visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center. Sincerely, Tamara O'Neal Assistant Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering cc Pasco Engineering, Engineer of Work Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer permlUfl le enc Right -of -way Construction Permit Standard Conditions Requirements for Proof of Insurance Security Obligation Agreements (various) Utility Trench Backflll and Resurfacing Standard GVBond & Fee & Relcm Letlers\BOND AND FEE LETTERS \grauer.doc 1 112' AC FINISH COURSE 1/2' MAX. AGGREGATE PLANE 1 1/2' DEEP AND TRENCH WIDTH IF LESS THAN 2' 12' BEYOND TRENCH LINE SEE SPECS. REMOVE /REPLACE \ PAVEMENT TO GUTTER 120 OR REMOVE /REPLACE AC BERM. I NOTES 1. FOR DEPTHS UP TO 51, NO TRENCH SUPPORT IS REQUIRED UNLESS WET, UNSTABLE OR RUNNING SOIL IS ENCOUNTERED. FOR DEPTHS EXCEEDING 5 FEET, SHORING OR SOLID SHEATHING IS REQUIRED. WHERE WET, UNSTABLE OR RUNNING SOIL IS ENCOUNTERED, SOLID SHEATHING IS REQUIRED. 2. EXISTING A.C. SHALL BE CUT AND REMOVED IN SUCH A MANNER SO AS NOT TO TEAR, BULGE OR DISPLACE ADJACENT PAVEMENT. EDGES SHALL BE CLEAN AND VERTICAL. ALL CUTS SHALL BE PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO STREET CENTERLINE, WHEN PRACTICAL, 3. FINISH COURSE OF AC RESURFACING SHALL BE LAID DOWN USING A SELF PROPELLED SPREADER BOX) UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 4. CHIP OR SLURRY SEALING SHALL BE APPLIED AS REQUIRED BY AGENCY. APPROVED BY THE CIiY OF BJCNffAS STAI�ARD DRAWING REV BY APPR DATE CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY ENGINEER DATE LMLITY TRENCH BACKFILL DRAWING -m AND RESURFACING STANDARD INUMBER 6'CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE EXIST. AC 4L COMPACTED TO 95% MIN. PAVEMENT RELATIVE COMPACTION x m: AC FIRST COURSE -3/4' = MAX. AGGREGATE PAVEMENT REINFORCEMENT EXIST. PAVEMENT PLUS MEMBRANE[ IE. PETROMAT, fo 1' AC -MIN. 3' AC t 12' GLASSGRID, OR EQUAL. o NATIVE OR IMPORTED MATERIP a o u APPROVED BY THE OFFICE OF H N IL THE CITY ENGINEER. TOP 12' z w COMPACTED TO 95% MIN. a w RELATIVE COMPACTION. a w ti MAGNETIC WARNING TAPE 4' BEDDING SEE SPEC . NOTES 1. FOR DEPTHS UP TO 51, NO TRENCH SUPPORT IS REQUIRED UNLESS WET, UNSTABLE OR RUNNING SOIL IS ENCOUNTERED. FOR DEPTHS EXCEEDING 5 FEET, SHORING OR SOLID SHEATHING IS REQUIRED. WHERE WET, UNSTABLE OR RUNNING SOIL IS ENCOUNTERED, SOLID SHEATHING IS REQUIRED. 2. EXISTING A.C. SHALL BE CUT AND REMOVED IN SUCH A MANNER SO AS NOT TO TEAR, BULGE OR DISPLACE ADJACENT PAVEMENT. EDGES SHALL BE CLEAN AND VERTICAL. ALL CUTS SHALL BE PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO STREET CENTERLINE, WHEN PRACTICAL, 3. FINISH COURSE OF AC RESURFACING SHALL BE LAID DOWN USING A SELF PROPELLED SPREADER BOX) UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 4. CHIP OR SLURRY SEALING SHALL BE APPLIED AS REQUIRED BY AGENCY. APPROVED BY THE CIiY OF BJCNffAS STAI�ARD DRAWING REV BY APPR DATE CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY ENGINEER DATE LMLITY TRENCH BACKFILL DRAWING -m AND RESURFACING STANDARD INUMBER CITY OF ENCINITAS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SECURITY OBLIGATION AGREEMENT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /we , Principal, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Encinitas, a municipal corporation, in the County of San Diego, State of California, in the sum of ($ ) in the form of on deposit with the City Finance Officer (per Receipt # ) and to be held by it until this obligation becomes void and if any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by the City of Encinitas to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provisions recited hereinafter. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known as , in accordance with Engineering Permit No. dated and is required by the City Code to give a security to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall be conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Engineering Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the ordinances and standards of the City of Encinitas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this day of , 19 Principal Business Address BO /03 /PW1 -21wp5 8 (01/18/93 -11) ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations City pf Subdivision Engineering f JJ Traffic Engineering Encinitas REQUIREMENTS FOR PROOF OF INSURANCE Applicable to Public Improvement Permits, Sewer Construction Permits, Construction Permits, Permanent Encroachment Permits, and Temporary Encroachment Permits. (Utility Construction Permits and Transportation permits are regulated separately.) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY OR ANY PUBLIC EASEMENT, THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS FOR PROOF OF INSURANCE AS SHOWN ON A VALID CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE SHALL BE MET: 1.) Submittal of an original document 2.) Name, address and telephone number of insurance agency. 3.) Name, address and telephone number of insured who shall at all times be the contractor properly licensed to accomplish the work and identified as such on the permit to be issued. In cases of engineering investigations the Engineer of Work is considered the contractor for insurance purposes. Similarly, where permits are issued for temporary traffic control and a licensed professional need not do the work, the applicant is also the insured. 4.) Company (ies) affording coverage. 5.) Statement clearly certifying validity of document as proof of insurance coverage. 6.) Provision and identification of the type or insurance as Lteneral Ltantlny wnn a minimum taint or st.uuu UUu.UU for each occurrence and aggregate for combined bodilv injury and property damage. The policy number, policy effective date and policy expiration date shall be provided. Coverage must be current, in force and the policy expiration date must not precede the permit expiration date. 7.) Provision and identification of the City of Encinitas as Additional Insured. 8.) Provision and identification of the City of Encinitas as Certificate Holder using the following address: City of Encinitas Attn: Engineering Services 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 9.) Notification regarding Cancellation Procedure limited to the following: "Should any of the above described policies be canceled before the expiration date thereof the issuing company will mail 30 days written notice to the Certificate Holder named." Any exceptions to the above declaration are unacceptable and shall be deleted or crossed out. 10.) Original signature of authorized representative of insurance carrier. Facsimile copies of Certificate of Insurance are acceptable provided the original document has been mailed and is forthcoming. Should the City of Encinitas fail to receive the original document the permit shall be declared invalid retroactive to the date of issuance and thereby revoked. Use (760) 633 -2818 please. Should you have any questions regarding these requirements please contact the Engineering Services Department at (760) 633 - 27802779. ISG /ARR/Proof of lnsurance.doe/02.02.99 TEL 760- 633 -2600 1 FAX 760 - 6332627 505 1 of I uican Avenue. Enuniras. California 92024 -3631 76U -633 2700 recycled paper ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 0 RIGHT -OF -WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT STANDARD CONDITIONS The following standard conditions are a part of Permit No. I. No access or work shall be performed within the City right -of -way without the full 10. The roadway shall be clean and free of all obstructions and completely open to traffic at knowledge of the assigned City Inspector who shall be given not less than 48 hours the end of each working day. (No later than 3:00 P.M. on major roads, defined herein.) advance notice of the initiation of permitted use at (760) 633 -2796 or 633.2797, or as 11. Two -way traffic shall be maintained at all times. Minimum travel lane width for motor stated on the permit. 2. At least 48 hours prior to starting work, Underground Service Alert (USA) shall be vehicles shall be 12 feet, If street width prevents maintaining two -way traffic, perrnince and Director of Engineering Services shall agree on an adequate traffic control plan prior notified for location of underground utilities at 1- 8004224133. The proposed dig area to starting work, which shall include the use of a full -time flagman. must be marked in white paint prior to contacting (USA). 12. All excavations in existing pavement shall be saw cut to neat lines and AC replacement 3. All work covered by this permit shall he performed by a contractor possessing a valid shall be made to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services or his duly California contractor's license of the appropriate class. authorized representative. 4. All traffic control within the construction area shall be subject to an approved traffic 13. Open trench must be baekfilled and capped with at least 2" of cold mix asphalt or metal control plan and shall be flagged and barricaded to the satisfaction of the City Inspector plated according to City specifications during non - working hours. Metal plates are in compliance with the "Work Area Traffic Control Handbook ", latest edition published required to have cold mix asphalt ramps on all (4) sides and must be maintained. Refer to by Building News, Inc. In the event that the Inspector determines proper traffic control is the City's Standard Drawing dated July 31, 1990. not in place, all work shall cease and permittee authorizes the Director of Engineering 14. Native material may be used upon approval of the Director of Engineering Services or Services or his duly authorized representative to order, on the rental basis, such traffic his duly authorized representative. Refer to the City's Standard Drawing dated control devices as shall be necessary and proper to protect the public safety and further September 30, 1996. agrees to pay any and all costs and charges that the City may incur in providing said 15. Two sack sand - cement slurry backfill shall be required when tunneling under curb and traffic control. gutter or other improvements not designated for removal. 5. Applicant agrees that it shall be his responsibility to provide the contractor, 16. Two sack sand- cement slurry mix shall be required as backfill on all lateral excavations subcontractor, or any other agent responsible for construction of permitted works within the City right -of -way, with a copy of the permit including these standard conditions within prime arterials, major roads and collectors as well as all locations where the inspector and a complete set of approved plans. The permit, plans and Work Area Traffic Control 17. deems the native material to be unacceptable for use as backfill. Care shall be exercised to prevent water, soil and debris from depositing in gutters, Handbook shall be available at the permit site whenever work is in progress. 6. Permitted works shall be constructed in accordance with the City specifications and streets and storm drains. No washing out of mixers or concrete pumps will be allowed City approved plans, subject to inspection and approval by the Director of Engineering 18. on streets. Violations will be referred for NPDES enforcement and penalties. Any roadway striping damaged or removed during the operations of this permit shall be Services or his duly authorized representative. Certification for all materials and work, matched and replaced by the applicant using the latest edition of State Department of including compaction tests, shall be furnished by the applicant upon request by the City Transportation specifications for paint, all to the satisfaction of the Director of Inspector. Payment for any compaction testing shall be by the permittee. Certification Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative. shall be made by a certified testing agency or firm acceptable to the City. 19. All concrete work shall be transit mixed and conform to the Standard Specifications for 7. No work within the public right -of -way is permitted on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Public Works Construction, Latest Edition, Section 201, and be approved by the Director Any deviation from the work schedule presented in these conditions must receive prior, of Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative . written approval of the Director of Engineering Services or his duly authorized 20. Trenching for installations across any intersecting roadway open to traffic shall be representative. Any questions regarding days City Hall is closed, call (760) 633.2770. 8. No work on any public roadway, excluding prime arterials and major roads, shall be progressive. Not more than half of the width of a traveled roadway shall be disturbed at started before 7:30 A.M. or continue after 5:00 P.M. on weekdays. 21. one time and the remaining width shall be kept open to traffic by bridging or backfilling. Where street dimensions and State Department of Health Services regulations 9. No work shall begin before 9:00 A.M. or continue after 3:00 P.M. on prime arterials and other major roads, unless authorized on the permit by the Director of Engineering allow, all pipes and conduits laid parallel to the roadway shall be placed at least five (5) feet from Services. All work on prime arterials and other major roads, all as shown on the Circulation Element the edge of the pavement or graded traveled roadway, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the Director of Engineering Services. The shallowest of any of the City's General Plan, will require a traffic control plan acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer portion pipeline or other facility shall be installed not less than thirty (30) inches below the roadway whose office can be contacted at (760) 633 -2704. surface. " 1SG /ARR/Std_Con. doc/ 11.27.00 Page 1 oft 22, 23. 24 25. 26. 27. '_8. 29. 30 31 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT -OF -WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT STANDARD CONDITIONS 21(a). Where street dimensions and State Department of Health Services regulations allow, all pipes and conduits laid parallel to existing utilities shall maintain a minimum separation of three (3) feet measured from the nearest edge of the facility. Any deviation from this requirement is not allowed unless approved by the Director of Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative. All excavated material shall be cast away from the improved portion of the highway. After the work has been completed, all excess material, including trench spoils, shall be removed from the right -of -way. The roadway shall be left in neat and orderly condition. All roadside drainage ditches shall be restored to true grades and the intake and outlet ends at all culverts shall be left free from all excess materials and debris. All approaches to private driveways and intersecting roads and streets shall be kept open to traffic at all times, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Engineering Services. Clay and earth which adhere to the paved surface of the roadway shall be removed by hand scraping, washing and sweeping, or by any other method which will leave a clean non-skid surface without impairing, injuring or loosening the surface. Permittee shall comply with any and all directives issued by the Director of Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative in order to prevent dust or other materials from becoming a nuisance or annoyance. Temporary patching of trench is required on lateral cuts in surfaced streets immediately after backfilling. After completion of the refilling and compacting of the backfill material in the excavation, all as specified in the Standard Drawing dated September 30, 1996, and the removal of obstruction(s), the permittee shall promptly replace with temporary or permanent patching material, or repair any portion of the highway surface removed or damaged by the excavation, obstruction, or construction operations, all to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services, and as specified elsewhere herein. The Director of Engineering Services may, at his option, elect to do the surfacing or repairing himself; in such case, the permittee shall bear the cost of such work. Temporary patching material may be left in place for up to 30 days, but must be continually maintained. Where the pavement, except Portland Concrete Cement pavement, or other type of surface has been removed by others, the permittee shall replace it with a standard repair of four (4) inches AC over approved backfill or repair section shall be one (1) inch AC greater than existing structural section, whichever is greater. Refer to the Standard Drawing dated September 30, 1996. Repairs to PCC pavement shall be made pursuant to the specifications of the assigned Engineering Inspector. If, after the refilling of an excavation, the permittee fails or refuses to resurface or repair that portion of the surface of the roadway damaged by him, or if the Director of Engineering Services has elected to do such resurfacing or repairing, the Director of Engineering Services shall cause the repair to occur; and the perminec shall be charged with the cost thereof computed by the Director of Engineering Services. When shoring is required, an engineered detail drawing will be required for approval by the Director of Engineering Services. All OSHA regulations shall be met. All directional bores shall be subject to approval of the method in the field by the assigned Engineering Inspector, acting as the duly authorized agent of the Director of Engineering Services. A thorough examination of the subsurface conditions is a prerequisite. The applicant shall identify the bore method on the permit application either JSG /..A_MSld_Con.doc/ 11.27.00 as auger, hammer, hydraulic, etc., and show the bore pits. Grouting and intermediate bore pits may be required. 32. All subsurface utilities shall be accurately shown on the applicant's site plan for those excavations in excess of 250 linear feet, traversing signalized intersections, crossing interconnect wires, or otherwise where the Director of Engineering Services has a special concern. 33. Pavement cuts in streets rehabilitated or newly constructed within the past two years shall be categorically denied. 34. This permit may be immediately revoked for reasons in the best interest of the City, for violation of permit conditions, or for the creation of a nuisance, all upon notice given by the Director of Engineering Services or his authorized representative. In the event of such revocation, applicant shall immediately cease all operations and restore City right - of -way as directed by the Director of Engineering Services or his duly authorized representative. After notification, City may take full possession of the area. Applicant shall pay to the City any and all costs involved, in the event the City has to restore City property or remove any items installed by the applicant. 35. This permit may become void in the event the use permitted is not started within sixty (60) calendar days from the date of issuance or in the event the permitted use is abandoned for a period exceeding sixty (60) calendar days after construction has begun. In such event, it shall be necessary to obtain a new permit and pay additional fees. Upon commencement of work, all operations, including cleanup and restoration of City right - of-way, shall be completed within the time limit specified by the permit. 36. The perrnittec guarantees to save, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Encinitas and all its agents, officers, employees and officials against all liabilities, judgments, costs and expenses, which may in any manner or form arise in consequence of the issue of this permit or any work performed in consequence thereof. 37. The permittee guarantees all work constructed, installed and effected under this permit for a period of one year from the date of final inspection. Any repairs required during the guarantee period shall be made at the expense of the permittee. At the option of the Director of Engineering Services, repair work may be performed by either the permittee or the City. 38. Permittee has read, understands and agrees to comply with all construction permit provisions and standard conditions. Signature: Permittee Printed Namerfitle /Company Date Page 2 of 2 k J _=`a r City Of Encinitas June 23, 1999 Wayne Pasco Pasco Engineering 535 North Highway 101, Ste. A Solana Beach, CA 92075 Re: Meeting Notes for the AMDAL Residential Care Facility Proposed for the Property Located at the Southwest Comer of El Camino Real and Tennis Club Drive (City Case No. 98 -236 MUP /CDP/EIA). Dear Mr. Pasco Thank you for meeting with wildlife agency staff from the California Department of Fish & Game (CDF &G) and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USF &WS) on June 17, 1999, concerning access to the above referenced project. In attendance with us at that meeting were: Bill Tippets (CDF &G), Julie Vanderwier (USF &WS), Anita Hayworth (Dudek & Associates), Rob Blough (City Traffic Engineer), and Blair Knoll (Associate Engineer). The following is a summary of my notes from the meeting. The focus of the meeting was related to access to the site from Tennis Club Drive and the adequacy of a wildlife corridor along the site's north property line. It was explained to the wildlife agency staff that the City would not support a direct access driveway to El Camino Real due to side friction traffic concerns and that AMDAL has been unsuccessful in obtaining access to the site from the property to the south. Wildlife agency staff expressed their concerns that a minimum wildlife corridor width of 60 -feet on the south side of Tennis Club Drive was not being maintained by the project's current design. This corridor width is necessary given the approximately 90 -foot wide corridor provided on the north side of Tennis Club Drive in association with a previously approved project. An adequate corridor at this location is necessary to connect open space vegetation on steep slopes to the west of the site with the open space easements and Land Conservation Bank (Tchang property) to the east, across El Camino Real. It was agreed that the project could be redesigned to provide a 60 -foot corridor width and to reduce the access driveway width to Tennis Club Drive given necessary turning radius requirements for delivery trucks and emergency vehicles. In addition, it was suggested that the driveway gate be relocated to a point to the south of the 60 -foot wide wildlife corridor. The redesigned project could go forward with the City's requirement that AMDAL makes a "good faith" effort to obtain access /egress rights to Tennis Club Drive. Easement rights to Tennis Club Drive would allow for the 20 -foot wide easement along the property's northern property line and the easement to the property to the west to be vacated. The vacated easement could then be included in the 60 -foot wildlife corridor width. TEL 760 -633 -2600 1 FAX 760 -633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 lv� recycled paper If AMDAL is unable to obtain access/egress rights to Tennis Club Drive after a "good faith" effort, City engineering staff would present the project to City Council for their consideration of whether to condemn Tennis Club Drive for public safety reasons, or to negotiate to buy the easement and convert it back for private use. AMDAL would be responsible for any fees or costs expended by the City in association with either process. After the City receives the revised Site Plan for the project, it will be routed to the City's Environmental Consultant for the project and to the wildlife agencies for comment. I hope you find that the above discussion adequately summarizes the June I r meeting. Should you have any questions related to this correspondence, or if my understanding of the meeting is different from yours, please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience by telephoning (760) 633- 2713. Sincerely, Craig R. Olson Associate Planner c: Julie Vanderwier, USF&WS Bill Tippets, CDF &G Anita Hayworth, Dudek & Associates Bill Weedman, City Planner Rob Blough, Traffic Engineer Blair Knoll, Associate Engineer Tom Curriden, Senior Planner OL NF N �f Municipal Water District 1966 Olivenhain Road • Encinitas, CA 92024 • Tel: 760 - 753 -6466 • Fax: 760- 753 -5640 September 2, 1998 City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA, 92024 -3633 Attn: Tom Curriden Subject: tN�o98-23'8 P /CDP/E1A ✓' Dear Tom: The District has received your notice concerning the subject project. The project has not yet been submitted to the District for hydraulic analysis to determine the District's capability to serve the project. Upon submission of the information required to perform the study, the District's consulting engineer will make a report on water service. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, Oli nhain Municipal Water District F.D.Fontanesi Engineering Administrator Cc: Wayne Pasco, Pasco Engineering Board of Directors Ann L Perry, President Harold L Gano, Vice Resident Harley L Denk, Secretary Thelma M. Miller, Treasurer Susan J. Cana Director General Manager David C. Mccollom Legal Counsel Pelizer & Oliva A public agency proudly serving portions of Leucadia, Cardiff, Solana Beach, Rancho Santa Fe, Encinitas, Carlsbad, San Diego and the Olivenhain Valley. .1ftF � lf! e(7"CNI9l�lLafCd/G�2 c(X�ll'Q� 0 �a December 13, 2000 To: City of Encintas Re: The Grauer Foundation School Development Project Dear Sirs: This letter authorizes Pasco Engineering to sign as an agent of our Clearing Plan application. Enclosed, please find $700, submitted to cover our Clearing Plan fee. Yours,truly, - -,I DEC 1 5 1000 EN NEERInr; i rauer CITY ,7F President and Head o - chool Project Cc: David Meyer, Executive Treasurer of the Board 2210 Encinitas Boulevard • Suite V • Encinitas • CA 92024 -4358 (619) 944 -6777 • f" (619) 944 -6784 -stuart@grauemchool.com • EIN tt 33- 0708902 PASCO ENGINEERING, IN%,,. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLA ( 92075 858) 259-8212 WAYNE FAX (858) 259-4812 R.0 EP295777 December 5, 2000 PE 789G J Grauer School 2210 Encinitas Blvd., Suite T Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Stuart Grauer RE: PROPOSED GRAUER SCHOOL SITE —TENNIS CLUB DRIVE AND EL CAMINO REAL Dear Mr. Grauer: This is to advise you of recent developments with City staff relative to processing of the above referenced project. In various telephone conferences with Bill Weedman and Masih Maher we have established that we can, in fact, process a clearing plan based on the Amdal approval. We must demonstrate that access rights over Tennis Club Drive have been acquired and that habitat mitigation has been purchased prior to City plan approval. Our strategy is to submit the plan for 1" plan check as soon as possible with the understanding that you will supply us with a recorded easement over Tennis Club and proof of mitigation land purchase for submittal to the City prior to their approval of the plan (hopefully shortly after the return of the first plan check). Additionally, I was able to confirm with both Bill and Masih that we can file grading and improvement plans that implement the Amdal approval. Both parties understand that we will be processing an amendment to the existing MUP concurrent with the processing of these final engineering drawings. Masih advised that the one caveat he has to this strategy is that if the changes occurring as a result of the amended use are significant, he may require that additional plan check fees be paid. Grauer School/PE789G Dec. 5, 2000 Page 2 Based on previous conversations with you, it is my understanding that you should find no difficulties with us proceeding as outlined above. If that is not the case, please contact me as soon as possible so that we can resolve any outstanding issues. Very truly yours, PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. W6 � 4 QGp Wayne Pasco, RCE 29577 President WP /js Cc: Bill Weedman Masih Maher John McKinley HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND TENNIS CLUB DRIVE, ENCINITAS, CA f. GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION 2210 ENCINITAS BLVD ENCINITAS, CA 92024 DATE: 5 -17 -2001 PREPARED BY: PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HWY. 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA. 92075 N.29577 Exp. 3/31103 WAYNE A. PASCO, RCE 29577 MAY 2 9 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION ...................................................... ..............................1 B. DISCUSSION ............................................................ ..............................I C. CONCLUSION ......................................................... ............................... I D. 100 YEAR HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS ......... ..............................D E. HYDRAULICS ........................................................ ............................... E F. APPENDIX A .......................................................... ............................... F G. APPENDIX B .......................................................... ............................... G A. INTRODUCTION The subject property is physically located near the intersection of El Camino Real and Tennis Club Drive. It is geographically located at 33 °01'40" North Latitude and 117 °15'30" West Longitude. The purpose of this report is to analyze the impacts of 100 year storm flows on the proposed storm drain system. The site is approximately 4.58 acres and the project consists of grading and improvements required to construct a private school to be constructed in 3 phases. Phase 1 includes 6 temporary relocatable buildings on the southerly portion of the site. Phase 2 consists of the construction of a single -story 12,000 sf school building on the northerly portion of the lot and phase 3 includes the removal of the temporary buildings along with the construction of a 10,000 sf school building. Based on data, calculations and recommendations contained within this report, a system can be constructed to adequately intercept, contain and convey Q,00 to the appropriate discharge points. ll] 6Y11W.7DM The hydraulic soil group classification for the site is "D ". The methodology used herein to determine Qioo is modified rational. The program utilized is by Advanced Engineering Software (AES). The attached site hydrology map (Appendix A) shows the hydraulic node location map for the HGL calculations herein. Please refer to Appendix B for offsite drainage area maps. Also, see Section D for calculations herein for area drain inlet and detention basin claculations. C. CONCLUSION Based on the information and calculations contained in this report it is the professional opinion of Pasco Engineering that the storm drain system as proposed on the corresponding Grading Plan will function to adequately intercept, contain and convey Q,w to the appropriate points of discharge. D. HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE Reference: SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1985,1981 HYDROLOGY MANUAL (c) Copyright 1982 -92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 1.3A Release Date: 3/06/92 License ID 1388 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N. Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 ❑❑❑❑ C] CJC7❑ OOCJCIDCIDCIC ]ODCIDC7C17C]C]OC)000�C1C7C700� 0L1[ 70L7000OOOC] CJC7C] OC] C ]C]CroOC10C�OC]OC]C)0[7ClC)00000 SQu %t / ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- FILE NAME: 789G -S.DAT TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 9:36 5/23/2001 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: 1985 SAN DIEGO MANUAL CRITERIA USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00 6 -HOUR DURATION PRECIPITATION (INCHES) = 2.500 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 3.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE _ .95 SAN DIEGO HYDROLOGY MANUAL "C "- VALUES USED NOTE: ONLY PEAK CONFLUENCE VALUES CONSIDERED } i*# i**+ i#*** ii# i#}} i } * * * # * * *i * } + +ki # # ** # * ** ♦ :*i *i+ #iii } * } * * # * * * ** * *+i * }}}*i FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.30 TO NODE 3.20 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»> RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9500 NATURAL WATERSHED NOMOGRAPH TIME OF CONCENTRATION WITH 10- MINUTES ADDED = 12.03(MINUTES) INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH - 600.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 250.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 134.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 116.00 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 3.790 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 6.65 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.95 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) 6.65 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.20 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE = 6 » » >COMPUTE STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 139.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 132.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 190.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6. STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) = 12.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK - 10.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) = .020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 * *TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 7.03 * * *STREETFLOW SPLITS OVER STREET - CROWN * ** FULL DEPTH(FEET) = .37 FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 12.00 FULL HALF- STREET VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 2.55 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .37 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 12.00 AVERAGE FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 2.55 PRODUCT OF DEPTH &VELOCITY = .93 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MIN) = 1.24 TC(MIN) = 13.27 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 3.510 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .23 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .77 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) = 4.18 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 7.41 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = .37 RALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 12.00 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 2.55 DEPTH *VELOCITY = .93 ara*# ar# ar###} r+* r# a+ w# ar#+ t+ t+ ixsaaiaa+ tt+ ii +at + +a + + + +r *sr #sw *wa *rrrw *r#raa FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.51 TO NODE 3.50 IS CODE = 8 ------------------- - -- -- »» >ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW« «< 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 3.510 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .04 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .11 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.22 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 7.53 TC(MIN) = 13.27 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.41 TO NODE 3.40 IS CODE = 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW««< 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 3.510 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .02 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .07 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.24 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 7.59 TC(MIN) = 13.27 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.10 TO NODE 10.00 IS CODE 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW««< 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 3.510 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .06 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .19 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) 4.30 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 7.79 TC(MIN) = 13.27 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 11.10 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE = 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »» >ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW««< - - - - - -- - --- ------ - - - - -- --------------- 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 3.510 *USER SPECIFIED(SUBAREA): COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .13 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .21 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.44 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 8.00 TC(MIN) = 13.27 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW««< 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 3.510 *USER SPECIFIED(SUBAREA): COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .05 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .09 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 4.49 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 8.08 TC(MIN) = 13.27 ++++++++ t+ wtttaww# w+ t# ww# wstwwawt + + + + + +twttwwwwwwwwww +w + + +swswww wwwwwasastas FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.20 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE = 10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>MAIN- STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 1 ««< FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.10 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< *USER SPECIFIED(SUBAREA): COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .6000 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW - LENGTH = 195.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 140.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 137.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 3.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 10.887 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 3.988 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.21 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .50 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) - 1.21 ++ t+++# a##+# tt+# a+# at# a#++ a+++ taat+ t+#+++++++ +a +t + #t +a + + + + + +ta # # + +t +ttt # #t ++ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 13.00 IS CODE 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >COMPUTE PIPEFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< »»> USING COMPUTER - ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON - PRESSURE FLOW) ««< DEPTH OF FLOW IN 6.0 INCH PIPE IS 4.0 INCHES PIPEFLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 8.6 UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 137.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 136.00 FLOWLENGTH(FEET) = 13.00 MANNING'S N = .013 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 6.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPEFLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 1.21 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .03 TC(MIN.) = 10.91 ++ t+ tt+++++ t+ af+ f+ fff++ ff+ r+ rrt# arar+# r+ tt++ t + # # # +rtt #t #tt #ttt +ttwrwwwwtwtww FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.10 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE 6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>COMPUTE STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< UPSTREAM ELEVATION 145.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION 132.00 STREET LENGTH(FEET) = 460.00 CURB HEIGHT(INCHES) = 6. STREET HALFWIDTH(FEET) - 30.00 DISTANCE FROM CROWN TO CROSSFALL GRADEBREAK = 15.00 INTERIOR STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 OUTSIDE STREET CROSSFALL(DECIMAL) _ .020 SPECIFIED NUMBER OF HALFSTREETS CARRYING RUNOFF = 1 * *TRAVELTIME COMPUTED USING MEAN FLOW(CFS) = 2.32 STREETFLOW MODEL RESULTS: STREET FLOWDEPTH(FEET) _ .27 PRODUCT OF DEPTHSVELOCITY - .97 STREETFLOW TRAVELTIME(MIN) - 2.15 TC(MIN) = 13.06 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 3.546 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .67 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.26 SUMMED AREA(ACRES) = 1.17 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.46 END OF SUBAREA STREETFLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) _ .31 HALFSTREET FLOODWIDTH(FEET) = 9.07 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 3.68 DEPTH *VELOCITY = 1.13 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 16.50 TO NODE 16.00 IS CODE = 8 - ---- -- ------ --- -- - - -- -- ----- - ----- ----- »» >ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW««< 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 3.546 *USER SPECIFIED(SUBAREA): COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .7900 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .24 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .66 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.41 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.13 TC(MIN) - 13.06 **# xx# t# tttat+ +i +i * ### # # + # # * * *w * *xi #t## +t + +t+ +irk ♦ +tittrka* * *i * *x * # * * * # * *t ** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 16.50 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » » >DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 13.06 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 3.55 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 1.41 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 4.13 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.10 TO NODE 8.00 IS CODE = 21 » » >RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8500 INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW- LENGTH = 25.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 140.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 139.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 1.00 URBAN SUBAREA OVERLAND TIME OF FLOW(MINUTES) = 1.417 *CAUTION: SUBAREA SLOPE EXCEEDS COUNTY NOMOGRAPH DEFINITION. EXTRAPOLATION OF NOMOGRAPH USED. TIME OF CONCENTRATION ASSUMED AS 5- MINUTES 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.587 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .52 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = .09 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .52 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 8.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- »»>COMPUTE PIPEFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< »» >USING COMPUTER - ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON - PRESSURE FLOW) « «< DEPTH OF FLOW IN 6.0 INCH PIPE IS 3.0 INCHES PIPEFLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 5.3 UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 139.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 134.00 PIPEFLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) _ .52 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .42 TC(MIN.) 5.42 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 7.10 TO NODE 7.00 IS CODE = 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW««< 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.252 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .05 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .24 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .14 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) _ .76 TC(MIN) - 5.42 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 6.10 TO NODE 6.00 IS CODE = B ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW ««< 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.252 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .15 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .78 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .28 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.54 TC(MIN) = 5.42 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 5.10 TO NODE 5.00 IS CODE = 8 »»>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW««< 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 6.252 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .8500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .05 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .29 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .34 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.83 TC(MIN) = 5.42 # #iaia #a + * *iiriiaiaix * * * *i }a+ *ifs +x *i * *iita*xtxtxx * * *a *a #* *iii +a +t + +sirirari FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 4.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE 1 » »>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE««< » » >AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES««< TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 5.42 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HR) = 6.25 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = .34 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 1.83 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 4.13 13.06 3.546 1.41 2 1.83 5.42 6.252 .34 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 4.17 5.42 6.252 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) 5.16 Tc(MIN.) 13.06 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.75 rr+++ r++ + + + + + + + + +rrrr +r + +a +xxxrrx + +a + ++ +aaa ++ art +r + +rr + + + + +ararrxarar +arr +a+ FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 4.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE = 11 » »> CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 1 WITH THE MAIN- STREAM MEMORY« «< ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 5.16 13.06 3.546 1.75 ** MEMORY BANK A 1 CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY AREA NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) (ACRE) 1 8.08 13.27 3.510 4.49 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM RUNOFF Tc INTENSITY NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH /HOUR) 1 13.17 13.06 3.546 2 13.20 13.27 3.510 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 13.20 Tc(MIN.) = 13.27 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.24 +x +aaarr +ar ♦ +aaaxxrrxr+ aaa + +a ++ rata +a +xxrxxxraaa + + + + ++ +aura +♦raxxxarxxx +aax FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE = 3 » »>COMPUTE PIPEFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA««< » » >USING COMPUTER - ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON- PRESSURE FLOW) ««< DEPTH OF FLOW IN 12.0 INCH PIPE IS 8.5 INCHES PIPEFLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 22.2 UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 132.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 122.00 FLOWLENGTH(FEET) = 50.00 MANNING'S N = .013 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 12.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPEFLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 13.20 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .04 TC(MIN.) = 13.31 END OF STUDY SUMMARY: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 13.20 Tc(MIN.) = 13.31 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 6.24 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS= RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE Reference: SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1985,1981 HYDROLOGY MANUAL (c) Copyright 1982 -92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 1.3A Release Date: 3/06/92 License ID 1388 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N. Highway 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 -------------_--------------- .. -- _. _ — - - - --------------- -- ------------ dTA6VLy ------------------------------------ FILE NAME: 789G -N.DAT TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 15:34 5/24/2001 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1985 SAN DIEGO MANUAL CRITERIA USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) - 100.00 6 -HOUR DURATION PRECIPITATION (INCHES) = 2.500 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 3.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE _ .95 SAN DIEGO HYDROLOGY MANUAL "C "- VALUES USED NOTE: ONLY PEAK CONFLUENCE VALUES CONSIDERED FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.04 TO NODE 3.03 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- » »> RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS««< SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" RURAL DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .4500 NATURAL WATERSHED NOMOGRAPH TIME OF CONCENTRATION WITH 10- MINUTES ADDED = 11.43(MINUTES) INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW - LENGTH = 270.00 UPSTREAM ELEVATION = 170.00 DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION = 144.00 ELEVATION DIFFERENCE = 26.00 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 3.864 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.25 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .72 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.25 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.03 TO NODE 3.02 IS CODE = 3 » » >COMPUTE PIPEFLOW TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA ««< »» >USING COMPUTER - ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON- PRESSURE FLOW) ««< DEPTH OF FLOW IN 6.0 INCH PIPE IS 4.4 INCHES PIPEFLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC.) = 8.1 UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 144.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 142.00 FLOWLENGTH(FEET) = 30.00 MANNING'S N = .013 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 6.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPEFLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 1.25 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) _ .06 TC(MIN.) = 11.49 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.02 TO NODE 3.01 IS CODE = 51 --------------------------------------------------- ---- -------------- -- ---- UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 144.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION = 135.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) - 150.00 CHANNEL SLOPE = .0600 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = 1.00 "Z" FACTOR = 3.000 MANNING'S FACTOR - .030 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 1.50 CHANNEL FLOW THRU SUBAREA(CFS) = 1.25 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET /SEC) = 3.46 FLOW DEPTH(FEET) - .22 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = .72 TC(MIN.) = 12.22 FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.02 TO NODE 3.01 IS CODE - B ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > »»ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW ««< 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH /HOUR) = 3.702 SOIL CLASSIFICATION IS "D" SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .5500 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) _ .20 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) _ .41 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .92 TOTAL RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.66 TC(MIN) - 12.22 END OF STUDY SUMMARY: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.66 Tc(MIN.) = 12.22 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) _ .92 END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS E. HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS PRESSURE PIPE -FLOW HYDRAULICS COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: LACFD,LACRD,6 OCEMA HYDRAULICS CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1982 -92 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 4.5A Release Date: 2/20/92 License ID 1388 Analysis prepared by: Pasco Engineering, Inc. 535 N. Hwy. 101 Suite A Solana Beach,CA 92075 EMY]nunnnnonnnDUELLnEIEID nnnonnnnnonnn [-)MnnnnnnnnnnnnnnrUnnnnnnr =[]nnnnnn ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- FILE NAME: 789PIPE.DAT TIME /DATE OF STUDY: 15: 2 5/25/2001 NOTE: STEADY FLOW HYDRAULIC HEAD -LOSS COMPUTATIONS BASED ON THE MOST CONSERVATIVE FORMULAE FROM THE CURRENT LACRD,LACFCD, AND OCEMA DESIGN MANUALS. DOWNSTREAM PRESSURE PIPE FLOW CONTROL DATA: NODE NUMBER = 1.00 FLOWLINE ELEVATION = 122.00 PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 18.00 PIPE FLOW(CFS) = 13.20 ASSUMED DOWNSTREAM CONTROL HGL = 123.500 NODE 1.00 : HGL= < 123.500 >;EGL = < 124.366 >;FLOWLINE = < 122.000> PRESSURE FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 1.00 TO NODE 2.00 IS CODE = 1 UPSTREAM NODE 2.00 ELEVATION = 127.26 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CALCULATE PRESSURE FLOW FRICTION LOSSES(LACFCD): PIPE FLOW = 13.20 CFS PIPE DIAMETER = 18.00 INCHES PIPE LENGTH = 30.00 FEET MANNINGS N = .01200 SF =(Q /K) * *2 - (( 13.20)/( 113.797)) * *2 = .0134551 HF -L *SF - ( 30.00) *( .0134551) _ .404 NODE 2.00 HGL= < 123.904 >;EGL - < 124.770>;FLOWLINE= < 127.260> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESSURE FLOW ASSUMPTION USED TO ADJUST HGL AND EGL LOST PRESSURE HEAD USING SOFFIT CONTROL = 4.86 NODE 2.00 : HGL= < 128.760 >;EGL = < 129.626 >;FLOWLINE = < 127.260> PRESSURE FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 2.00 TO NODE 3.00 IS CODE = 5 UPSTREAM NODE 3.00 ELEVATION = 127.60 ----------------------- ---- -- ----------- ----- ----- - - -- --------------- CALCULATE PRESSURE FLOW JUNCTION LOSSES: NO. DISCHARGE DIAMETER AREA VELOCITY DELTA HV 1 3.5 8.00 .349 10.084 20.000 1.579 2 13.2 18.00 1.767 7.470 -- .666 3 7.4 12.00 .785 9.447 90.000 - 4 .0 .00 .000 .000 .000 - 5 2.3 = = =Q5 EQUALS BASIN INPUT = == LACFCD AND OCEMA PRESSURE FLOW JUNCTION FORMULAE USED: DY=(Q2*V2-Q1*V1*COS(DELTAI)-03*V3*COS(DELTA3)- 04 *V4 *COS(DELTA4)) /((A1 +A2) *16.1) UPSTREAM MANNINGS N - .01200 DOWNSTREAM MANNINGS N .01200 UPSTREAM FRICTION SLOPE _ .07230 DOWNSTREAM FRICTION SLOPE = .01346 AVERAGED FRICTION SLOPE IN JUNCTION ASSUMED AS .04288 JUNCTION LOSSES - DY +HV1 -HV2 +(FRICTION LOSS) +(ENTRANCE LOSSES) JUNCTION LOSSES - 1.915+ 1.579- .866 +( .172) +( .173) = 2.972 NODE 3.00 : HGL= < 131.020 >;EGL = < 132.599>;FLOWLINE= < 127.600> PRESSURE FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 3.00 TO NODE 4.00 IS CODE = 1 UPSTREAM NODE 4.00 ELEVATION = 130.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CALCULATE PRESSURE FLOW FRICTION LOSSES(LACFCD): PIPE FLOW = 3.52 CFS PIPE DIAMETER = 8.00 INCHES PIPE LENGTH = 70.00 FEET MANNINGS N = .01200 SF =(Q /K) * *2 = (( 3.52)/( 13.091)) * *2 = .0722989 HF =L *SF = ( 70.00) *( .0722989) = 5.061 NODE 4.00 HGL= < 136.081>;EGL= < 137.660 >;FLOWLINE = < 130.000> PRESSURE FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 4.00 TO NODE 5.00 IS CODE = 5 UPSTREAM NODE 5.00 ELEVATION = 130.20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CALCULATE PRESSURE FLOW JUNCTION LOSSES: NO. DISCHARGE DIAMETER AREA VELOCITY DELTA HV 1 1.6 8.00 .349 4.727 50.000 .347 2 3.5 8.00 .349 10.084 -- 1.579 3 .0 8.00 .349 .000 40.000 - 4 .0 .00 .000 .000 .000 - 5 1.9 = = =Q5 EQUALS BASIN INPUT = == LACFCD AND OCEMA PRESSURE FLOW JUNCTION FORMULAE USED: DY=(Q2*V2-Q1*V1*COS(DELTAI)-Q3*V3*COS(DELTA3)- Q4 *V4 *COS(DELTA4)) /((A1 +A2) *16.1) UPSTREAM MANNINGS N = .01200 DOWNSTREAM MANNINGS N .01200 UPSTREAM FRICTION SLOPE _ .01589 DOWNSTREAM FRICTION SLOPE _ .07230 AVERAGED FRICTION SLOPE IN JUNCTION ASSUMED AS .04409 JUNCTION LENGTH(FEET) - 2.00 FRICTION LOSS = .088 ENTRANCE LOSSES = .316 JUNCTION LOSSES = DY +HV1- HV2 +(FRICTION LOSS) +(ENTRANCE LOSSES) JUNCTION LOSSES = 2.712+ .347- 1.579 +( .088) +( .316) = 1.884 NODE 5.00 : HGL= < 139.197>;EGL- < 139.544 >;FLOWLINE - < 130.200> END OF PRESSURE FLOW HYDRAULICS PIPE SYSTEM Prepared by Pasco Engineering 05125/2001 Grauer Hydraulic Calculations Detention Basin Stand Pipe Calculation CALCULATE CAPACITY OF DET. BASIN STAND PIPE. FORMULA: Ocap = 3.0(P)(DA1.5) . PERIMETER AVAIL NW GRATE 0100 (CFS) P (FT) D (FT) FACTOR 3- CAPACITY (CFS) INLET TYPE PE 789G 13.20 9.44 0.70 1.00 16.59 36" dia. Stand Pipe OK Sheets Grauer Foundation for Education Hydraulic Calculations Area Drain Inlet Calculations CALCULATE CAPACITY OF AREA DRAINS. FORMULA Qcap = 3.0(P)(D "1.5) / 3. DIVISION BY 3 ACCOUNTS FOR GRATE 8 REASONABLE BLOCKAGE. Page 1 PERIMETER AVAIL NW GRATE FACTOR NODE Q100 (CFS) P(FT) D (FI) 2" CAPACITY (CFS) INLET TYPE 16.00 0.66 4.00 0.50 3.00 1.41 12"x 12" YARD DRAIN 14.00 1.21 4.00 0.50 3.00 1.41 12" x 12" YARD DRAIN 5.00 0.29 4.00 0.50 3.00 1.41 12" x 12" YARD DRAIN 6.00 0.78 4.00 0.50 3.00 1.41 12" x 12" YARD DRAIN 7.00 0.24 4.00 0.50 3.00 1.41 12" x 12" YARD DRAIN 8.00 0.52 4.00 0.50 3.00 1.41 12" x 12" YARD DRAIN 10.00 0.19 4.00 0.50 3.00 1.41 12" x 12" YARD DRAIN 11.00 0.21 4.00 0.50 3.00 1.41 12" x 12" YARD DRAIN 12.00 0.09 4.00 0.50 3.00 1.41 12" x 12" YARD DRAIN 3.40 0.07 4.00 0.50 3.00 1.41 12" x 12" YARD DRAIN 3.50 0.11 4.00 0.50 3.00 1.41 12" x 12" YARD DRAIN Page 1 Grauer Foundation for Education Hydraulic Calculations 3" PVC Curb Outlet Calculations (Refer to Hydrology Node Map for Node Locations) CALCULATE DISCHARGE OF 3" PVC OUTLET PIPE. CONSIDERED AS ORIFICE FORMULA: Q = (C)(A)((2)(32)(3)) ^0.5. 0.5 FEET OF AVAIL. HEADWATER DEPTH HW DEPTH LOSS COEF. AREA MAX. 3" PVC DISCHARGE 0.50 0.60 0.049 0.17 NODE Q100 (cfs) MAX DISCHARGE # OF 3" PVC REQUIRED 16.0 0.66 0.17 4 3.5 0.11 0.17 1 3.4 0.07 0.17 10.0 0.49 0.17 Page 1 F. APPENDIX COU14TY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTM:NT OF SANITATION b FLOOD CONTROL 45' 1 \ f LAG 301 i 34 \ 51TE SAN CL V. N 33 °o►`NO" H/� ►7,IS�1g'' 151; 1 33' 100 -YEAR 6 -HOU I PUECIPITATIUIN 0 10./ ISOPLUVIALS OF 100 -YEAR 6 -11OUR PRECIPITA ION IN SUNS OF At! NXII ELSI 30 I 4$1 !nM d Of U.S. DEPARTMEA f OF COWERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND AT. OSPRSRIC ADMINISTRATION SPRCIAL STUDIES BRANCH, OFFICE Of 11 DROLOOY. NATIONAL Y'EATHRR ORVICR 301 —I— —f- 1181 451 30' MAR L if yp -- �p�za�usa35 °" 3�1 15' 117- 115' 27. ;01 151 uccu 116- COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION S FLOOD CONTROL 451 301 SITE LdCATIUV N 3V IV" V" - - k/�1� °ISM ?5�� -- 151 33* SAN WMENTE 24-1-101 l00 YEd�li Id PRECIPITATION ,'- 20_./ISOPLUUTALS Oy 100 -YEAR 2441OUR PRECIPITATION 114 'ENTHS OF Aid INCH 1 —, -- rn � - i�l �Ito� 1 11 -X t�140 �t % /II 5 j. \ X11. X180 ( �a•.173�� c'1 sncf . � \�_ .. r ifi i / }f lft SiT� I1Njl 45' Pl.r. ! by I I 1 U.S. DEPARTME ' f OF COMMERCE ' NATIONAL OCEANIC AND AT: OSPIICRIC ADMINISTRATION SPECIAL STUDIES BRANCH. OvKICE Or 11 D110LOGY, NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE 301 I �_ H H y 1 111" 1151 j01 w 115, 1 35 \ 35-- G \uc. — I 100 tr uNe �l l ^i0. ect i �� .A 1! J.r , JJ in� j t i 6 _ 18088 iu 117' TI 11 ]D1 li1 11G" TABLE 2 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS (RATIONAL METHOD) DEVELOPED AREAS (URBAN) Land Use Residential: Single Family Multi -Units Mobile homes Rural (lots greater than 1/2 acre) Commercial(2) 80% Impervious Industrial (2) 90% Impervious Coefficient, C Soil Group (1) A B C D .40 .45 .50 .55 .45 .50 .6o .70 .45 .50 .55 .65 .30 .35 .40 .45 .70 .75 .8o 85 .80 .85 .90 .95 NOTES: (l)Soil Group mans are available at the offices of the Department of Public Works. (2)Where actual conditions deviate significantly from the tabulated impervious- ness values of 80% or 90%, the values given for coefficient C. may be revised by multiplying 80% or 90% by the ratio of actual imperviousness to the tabulated imperviousness. However, in no case shall the final coefficient be less than 0.50. For example: Consider commercial property on D soil,group. Actual imperviousness - 50% Tabulated imperviousness - 80% Revised C - 5O x 0.85 - 0.53 80 IV-A -9 APPENDIX IX -B Rev. 5/81 n All - i t, 1 �' ili W]•yl iC�.'(� Tsfi /y��r ;� � � � �� ft 7�l�.� �`ry � '.� W kip tl- t �, c• i Ma � /' �=P � '' S t 'T �' � 'r A r r +SQL' �' ri► •.. f7. Ifs' ". ;�wf!" . � .'•� . i �.. .� µ(, ''�:.y,.• ., ".�,~ ;nom t�,• :y: �� _,I�'_•a._ - � r�,:, , -_�.. , E� .: �`r- •,;,�. h �� r /��\ f r ✓AF. �. 1 V YY ..r4!._ 4_.. ��♦ a \ i\ CA tip tit OF j ! �► i G. EXHIBIT "A" PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. PE DATE ... .... ... -- - -- ------ — -- ---- 77n ---------- - --------- Table of Contents Nov 12, 2000 Hydro- Cartridge Brochure .......... . .............. ..................... .............. .......... .... 1. List of Existing Hydro - Cartridge Users .. .......- ....................... ..... ....................... 8. Description& Features ............ ....................... .......................... .- ... ........ ....... I....... 10. A.) Nomenclature B.) Mechanism of Operation C.) Installation Procedure D.) Maintenance Procedure E.) Handling of Waste - Sediments F.) Handling of Waste - Petroleum Hydrocarbon Filters City of Los Angeles Catch Basin Detail ................................... ............................... 22. Incorporating 2 - 24" x 36" Hydro - Cartridges ABSTRACT: Field Testing Analysis, EPA Rouge River Report ............................... 23. Field Testing Analysis: Rouge River Report ............................. ............................... 25. MEMORANDUM: Miami International Airport ................... ............................... 36. Evaluation of the Hydro- Cartridge. Letter from BOCA RATON Airport Authority ...................... ............................... 39. Impressed with effectiveness of trapping Hydrocarbon runoff without restricting flow rates. Letters from the United States Coast Guard ........................... ............................... 41. Note: For more information on the Hydro - Cartridge Absorbent, (Rubberizes(g), Please free to call Storm Water Systems. Letter from The City of Coral Gables, Florida ........................ ............................... 44. Thank you for introducing the City of Coral Gables to the Hydro - Cartridge. Critical Measurements for Grate Inlets ................................... ............................... 46. Length Vs. Efficiency of Hydro- Cartridges ............................. ............................... 49. S%.OW C APAc.1" 49.1. Notes For Retrofitting and Designing a New Storm Drain Filter Vault System ... 50. and Drawings: Dwg. No.: 2000- 11 -25, Parking Lot to Curb Drain. Dwg. No.: 2000- 12 -01, Regional Shopping Mall, Atlanta, GA. (200 Hydro - Cartridges). Dwg. No. 2000- 12 -03, Gutter Grate Drainage System. Pricing& Available Sizes ......................................................... ............................... 51. haw roe Hydro- Cartridge Brochure HYDRO- CARTRIDGES STORM DRAIN FILTRATION SYSTEM A SAINZ DESIGN Hydro- Cartridges is the latest environmental fiberplastic prod- uct developed by our company, directed to help our communi- ties in the task of improving storm drainage systems and the protection of the delicate aquifer. Its design allows its use in new or already existing storm drainage, giving it retrofitting characteristics. saving expensive improvements in critical areas, as well as elasticity in accordance with each situation. Hydro- Cartridges is a very simple and flexible concept with a rugged construction aimed to last and perform its duties any time. Hydro- Cartridges also can be used by environmental enforcing agencies as a valuable tool to monitor and control dangerous situations in private industries. 2 t Prevents contamination of the aquifer by trapping all kinds of hydrocarbons (oils, grease, gasoline, etc.) _ Traps debris, silt, heavy metals and solids from going into the drainage system, extending the system's life. . Spills containment capacity minimizing expensive cleanups. - Easy installation in new or old inlets. Inexpensive, simple maintenance and monitoring. Available for different inlet types or structure sizes. tlry ct� Do F-fycro- CartriooeI Frevent �,c; ocer��o -� Gontaminatio�? As shown in picture, the cartridge works full of water, with a water repellent hydrocarbon absorbent material floating at entrance. _ y 2. !rapin,nc ProCecure Debris. HEav'� hieta.'Q. Etc. As water starts flowing into the system, it flows downward through the central funnel at certain speed. When reaching the bottom, speed decreases, precipitating suspended con- tents to the bottom of cartridge. Clean water then rises in both sides of funnel to the two side openings where it spills out intc the structure. If any hydrocarbon spill reaches the inlet accidentally; it remains inside of the funne portion making its removal easy ant economical. before further contamination. occurs. M t1� Y. ct� Do F-fycro- CartriooeI Frevent �,c; ocer��o -� Gontaminatio�? As shown in picture, the cartridge works full of water, with a water repellent hydrocarbon absorbent material floating at entrance. _ y 2. !rapin,nc ProCecure Debris. HEav'� hieta.'Q. Etc. As water starts flowing into the system, it flows downward through the central funnel at certain speed. When reaching the bottom, speed decreases, precipitating suspended con- tents to the bottom of cartridge. Clean water then rises in both sides of funnel to the two side openings where it spills out intc the structure. If any hydrocarbon spill reaches the inlet accidentally; it remains inside of the funne portion making its removal easy ant economical. before further contamination. occurs. M AZI 4 i J Install cartridge. tip _ __✓.. fir. �1: i VIA i A -4 - Remove grate and clean frame. -�i. + Reset grate. t i4 _ __✓.. fir. �1: i VIA i A -4 - Remove grate and clean frame. -�i. + Reset grate. Checking the absorbing material for hydrocarbons requires only lifting grates for access, and replacing it by cutting the tie wraps when saturated. A new filter material kit is set in place quickly. For solids levels, a measuring bar is introduced through the grate and direct readings are taken. When solids level reaches close to funnel tip, cleaning is due. Cleaning the cartridge of solids is a simple, fast and inexpensive operation. Extract water from the unit with an electric bilge type pump, pouring it into an empty 55- gallon drum into any pickup truck. Then the cartridge unit is easily removed from the frame. Dump solids into truck, replace cartridge into frame and replace grate. A record sheet should be kept on each of the inlets, of which we can furnish a sample. 11 a } . - Y. The company is able to Municipalities, Cities, Counties, produce cartridges for the most etc., to approach special common and numerous inlet situations and needs in an types used in the industry over effort to protect our a long period of time, and is environment. willing to work with Storm Water Systems 18612 Saugus Ave. Santa Ana, Ca 92705 (714) 505 -2571 FAX (714) 505 -2188 ®U.S. PATENT N0. 5,297367 RECYCLEO RAPER 7 List of Existing Hydro- Cartridge Users C List of Existing Hydro- Cartridge Users August 6, 2000 City of Coral Gables F1. City of Hialeah F1. City of Miami Springs Fl. City of North Miami Springs Fl. City of Oakland Park Fl, City of South Miami Fl. City of Fort Lauderdale Fl. City of Pompano Beach Fl City of Sarasota F1. City of Virginia Beach VA. City of Dallas Tx. City of Santa Ana, Public Works CA. Brevard County Public Works Fl. Volusia County Public Works Fl. Miami -Dade County Dept, Of Solid Waste Fl. Jacksonville International Airport Fl. Miami International Airport Authority Fl. Boca Raton Airport Authority Fl. Homestead Airforce Base F1. Port Everglades Port Authority Fl. Florida D.O.T. Fl. Atlanta, 98 acre Regional Shopping Mall, (In process, 90 H/Cs) GA. F.P. & L. Company Miami -Stuart Fl. U.S.Postal Service Menphis Tn. United Parcel Services (U.P.S.) Miami Fl. B.S.I. Company Miami Fl. Mortis Investments Partnership Miami Fl. Green Cove Maritime Co. Fort Lauderdale Fl. Johnson Septic Tank Fort Lauderdale Fl. Lago Grande Development Co. Miami Fl. The Green Garage Miami Fl. Ayala Machine Shop Maimi Fl. Sterling Brothers Construction Co. Farmington N.M. Woodward Clyde International American Denver Co. Kelly Tractor Co. Miami Fl. Versar Inc. Springfield Va. B.J.'s Wholesale Club Miami Fl. Enter Transmission Inc. Miami Fl. Legend Golf Course Fort Myer Fl. Dollar Rent -A -Car Miami Fl. Mobil Quick Lube Garage Miami Fl. Uleta Rentals Inc. Miami Fl. Shell Oil Station Miami Fl. Frank's Collision Co. Miami Fl. Occidential College Los Angeles Ca. Espana Boddy Shop Miami Fl. Abna Engine Installation Miami Fl. Description & Features A.) Nomenclature B.) Mechanism of Operation C.) Installation Procedure D.) Maintenance Procedure E.) Handling of Waste - Sediments F.) Handling of Waste - Petroleum Hydrocarbon Filters iUs Description & Features The Hydro - Cartridge' is a patented fiberplastic pollution - control system designed to retrofit existing stonnwater drains of various dimensions and shapes. Its purpose is to intercept the various solid and liquid components commonly found in stormwater runoff flows. It will prevent these pollutants from entering the stonnwater discharge and elimination systems wWch flow into retention ponds, waterways, lakes and oceans. The Hydro - Cartridge possesses several very beneficial features. It will: 1) Trap solids such as silt, rocks and other heavier than water substances that routinely enter stonndrains during rainfall events or other activities, such as construction or street sweeping. Many of these sediments have been proven to contain pollutants such as heavy metals. C2) Trap a variety of petroleum hydrocarbon liquids that also flow routinely into stonndrains during rainfall events or during emergency spills onto roadways. A specially designed Hydro - Cartridge Petroleum Filter' absorbs liquid petroleum and locks it up permanently in a cross - linked polymer matrix. This effectively transforms these hazardous hydrocarbons into a benign, rubberized solid that is easy and safe to both handle and dispose. This material exceeds all current EPA and California (USA) environmental standards for absorbents. 3) Hold spills of a solid or liquid nature in the event of an emergency such as a drum rupture or fuel tank leak. Depending on the particular model of Hydra Cartridge'used, a volume from 10 gallons to over 50 gallons will be held thus preventing an unwanted flow of solid or liquid material into the stormdrain system. 4) Provide simple and cost - effective retrofitting for the many stonndrains in use by cities and industries required to address NPDES, CZARA & CWA regulations. 11 5) Allow monitoring of stonnwater pollutants and can aid illegal discharge detection of both solid and liquid materials G) Allow for fast and easy maintenance by existing general maintenance personnel or from third party contractors licensed to handle hazardous wastes. Nomenclature The Hydro - Cartridge' is designed to be compatible with the variety of standard stonndrain grate systems used in the past, currently in use and contemplated in the future. The majority of basic designs are either rectangular, square or circular with numerous aspect ratios in the United States and elsewhere. This makes the possible combination of different designs quite staggering, but the Hydro - Cartridge' is able to fit the majority of systems in use through clever design features and adapting plates. To assist with the selection of the correct Hydro - Cartridge' model, the model number matches the standard manufacturing code numbers that are generally stamped into the grate during manufacture. Most areas of the country have a majority of stormdrain grates from one or two local suppliers of cast iron products. Therefor, in each state or region where a primary manufacturer or supplier is identified; the use of their particular grate code will also be the same as the Hydro - Cartridge' model specified for that grate. Exceptions will be noted by us. For example, a standard rectangular drain size in South Florida is 14" x 25 ". Most of the stonndrains in this region are manufactured by the local company, U.S. Precast. Their 12 number for the grate to fit dais stonndrain is known by the code number "4102." Therefor, a city engineer would specify a "Hydro - Cartridge' Model 4102" for a unit that properly fits this particular size of stonndrain grate. In all cases, the suffix of S, M or L designates the unit's depth (e.g. 4102 L or 4105 S). A Small unit is for vaults 18" deep; Medium is up to 30" deep; Large is up to 40" deep. The depth of the Hydro - Cartridge' affects the capacity of the system when retaining liquid spills and is generally sized by the available depth of the stormdrain structure. In general, the deeper the Hydro - Cartridge used the better its ability to separate lighter density liquids, i.e. liquid petroleum runoff will tend to stay on the surface of the inlet area since it must travel through a longer column of water to be discharged into the stornndrain structure. Also, the greater the depth the greater the emergency holding capacity of the system during emergency spill events. Finally, the greater the depth of the system used the greater the solid holding capacity also. This can affect the periodicity of the maintenance required to keep the system operating at top efficiency; i.e. with a greater holding capacity the deeper systems will not need to be cleaned as often. 13 Mechanism of Operation The Hydro - Cartridge' is designed with simple but effective operating characteristics that allow it to perform several functions with regard to NPDES management. By utilizing natural principles of material physics a large amount of the runoff solids and liquids can be effectively trapped and held for later removal. When stonnwater flows enter the input of the Hydro - Cartridge' system water is usually already present due to the design which acts like a trap. This causes flows of solids to slow down immediately and suspends the solids within the flow. Liquids of different density, like most petroleum, hydrocarbons, will begin to float to the surface. In the case of faster flows of stonnwater, most of the low density liquids will suspend in the upper portion of the system allowing the higher density water to pass by and eventually discharge into the stormdrain structure. During very high volume flows some emulsification of the light density liquids will occur. Solids will begin to eventually precipitate out of the flow and settle at the bottom of the Hydro - Cartridge'. The flow of the water then changes direction and flows up both sides of the system, away from the center core where the flows came from originally. This side flow eventually discharges toward the top and sides of the system and into the stormdrain stricture. At the entrance to the system, the Hydro - Cartridge FilterTm attracts the liquids of lighter density i.e. the petroleum hydrocarbons that flow from the roadway surface. The 14 material in the filter is designed to capture and hold pennanently any petroleum hydrocarbons that may be in the stonnwater flow. During high volume flows of stonnwater, the filter is less effective than when the flow of stonnwater goes to zero. When no flow is going into the system the ability of the liquids of differing density to separate is increased. This causes the petroleum hydrocarbon portion of the flow to separate out and float on the surface in direct contact with the Hydrocartridge Filter'TM. The capture time for the filter is from a few seconds for lighter hydrocarbons, such as gasoline, up to a minute or so for heavier hydrocarbons, such as oil. In case of a large release of liquid contaminates that find their way into stormdrains fitted with the Hydro - Cartridge' system another design feature becomes apparent. The system is able to bold a relatively large capacity (over 40 gallons in some cases) of solids and/or liquids that occur during a spill onto the roadway. This will prevent undesirable flows of contaminates into the stonndrain structure and associated distribution and discharge pipes. This facilitates cleanup of the spilled contaminates and prevents a costly cleaning process of the underground structure and pipes. The Hydro - Cartridge' is a very effective first line of defense when dealing with potential leaks and associated flows to stormdrains for all types of situations. Because of its fiberplastic constriction, the system is able to withstand exposure to a wide range of liquid contan rates including acids and strong solvents such as TCE or Benzene. Additionally, the Hydro - Cartridge' will hold high density contaminates, such as 15 concrete, safely and will not cause buckling or collapse of the system while preventing their flow into the stonmdrain structure. Installation Procedure Installation of the Hydro - Cartridge' is simple and straightforward. Generally, one person is able to handle all aspects of installation and a minimum of equipment is required. The general procedure is outlined as follows: 1) Remove die grate to the stormdrain structure. 2) Use a wire brush to clean rocks and dirt from die grate frame. 3) Insert the Hydro - Cartridge' into the structure so it hangs on the frame. 4) Install a Hydrocartridge Filter' with plastic zip ties to the lifting hooks. 5) Reset the grate onto the grate frame. 6) (Optional) Fill the Hydro - Cartridge' with water. The entire procedure will take less than 5 minutes to complete in most cases. In the case of large stonndrain structures, such as those commonly found at airports, it may require two persons to remove the grate. Step 6 is optional but helps the system to work immediately to capture petroleum•hyd�ocarbons. Without water in die system initially, the system will first fill up with water thereby allowing only minimal contact of die water /petroleum layer with the filter. Preloading with water prevents the possibility of hydrocarbons flowing into the drain. 16 Maintenance Procedure The Hydro - Cartridge' is very easily monitored and maintained by normal maintenance personnel. Depending on the location of the system the frequency of maintenance visits is a factor of the surrounding area. For example, a system installed next to a vehicle maintenance area will generally require cleaning and filter replacement more often than a system installed at a suburban setting. Therefor, a maintenance record should be kept not only to prove the system has been properly maintained but to also help determine the frequency of visits to keep the system operating at top efficiency. An example of such a record is provided in the attachment section. The maintenance of the Hydro - Cartridge' system is uncomplicated and easily performed by one maintenance person. During regular visits to the site, a measurement of the solids level can be performed using a calibrated rod that is inserted through the storm grate to the bottom of the system. When the solids have reached a point that they begin to block the flow of water die system is ready for a cleaning operation. The procedure is as follows: 1) Remove the stonndrain grate. 2) Observe the Hydro - Cartridge Filter at the top of the system. If saturated with oil remove and place into a DOT approved drwn or container. 3) Using the pipe adapter attached to the suction hose of a pump out truck, insert the extractor pipe to the bottom of the Hydro - Cartridge and begin sucking out the solids and water into the pump out truck until removed. 17 4) (Optional) Fill the system with water. 5) Attach a new Hydro - Cartridge Filter to the lifting hooks using plastic zip ties. Only the specially designed, tested and approved filters from Advanced Aquatic Products should be utilized for maximum efficiency and safety. Use of any other will void any manufacturer warranties. 6) Reinstall the stonndrain grate. As previously noted, a maintenance record should be filled out to help track activity at each site and to prove the proper maintenance has been perfonned to the satisfaction of local regulatory agency personnel. Records can also act as evidence in cases where illegal discharges or dumping has been observed. Accurate records can also aid detection of pollution problems that were unanticipated. In cases where monitoring is required, samples of the solids and the filter should be kept and properly labeled for future analysis by a laboratory. Thus could aid DEP enforcement officials in locating the source of illegal pollutant discharges and the prevention of illegal dumping into the stormdrain system. Handling of Wastes -- Sediments Currently, there are no laws governing the specifics of stonndrain waste handling. Studies have shown that a number of pollutants, especially heavy metals, are contained in the solids found in stonndrains. As NPDES evolves it is anticipated that greater scrutiny will occur with regard to the handling and disposition of stonnwater runoff wastes. As such, we believe that all wastes coming from the use of the Hydro-Cartridge' should be handled in a responsible M and safe manner since we do have some idea of the contaminates commonly found. We have been recommending that the label "Uncharacterized Wastes" be used on drums or containers that store the solids coming from Hydro - Cartridge' maintenance. Until a sample is removed and properly tested by a laboratory it is only conjecture as to what exactly is in the solids removed from the system. The issue of stonnwater runoff will become more clear in the future as to the responsibility of proper handling of contaminates. Many issues have yet to be faced, such as the legal aspects of who is ultimately responsible for these contaminants, especially when collected from public areas which the local government is normally responsible to maintain. As we know, a variety of contaminates currently flow into drain systems without monitoring of any type. This is why the NPDES laws were developed. In general, these solids collected from the system should be handled as a toxic waste solid. It is therefor necessary to store this material in DOT approved drums for proper landfill disposal. Until some other method of disposal or use of the contaminated solids is developed this is the basic procedure necessary to insure that the solids will not contaminate some other site. Just spreading the sediment onto the surface of some piece of land just won't do. It is the basic responsibility of the maintenance contractor to document that proper handling of the solids has been achieved on behalf of the party who is using the Hydro - Cartridge' system to meet NPDES guidelines on their property. M Handling of Wastes — Petroleum Hydrocarbon Filters With regard to the petroleum hydrocarbons collected by the filter we have a straightforward means of dealing with the problem. The filters are composed of a cross - linked copolymer that has tremendous affinity for liquid hydrocarbons (petroleum). This material has been tested under the tradename "Rubberizes" and has over 9 years of use history without incident. The State of California has even allowed landfilling of filters containing PCB oils since the filter is designed to lock in contaminates permanently. When properly incinerated, the "Rubberizes" material by itself only releases water and carbon dioxide (complete combustion). Rubberizer has a built in heat value of approximately 18,000 Btu's per pound, making it an excellent secondary fuel material. For this reason, it is generally safe to incinerate the Hydro - Cartridge' Filters'' after they have been used to collect waste petroleum. Once the filter has been removed from the Hydro - Cartridge' during regular maintenance it should be placed into a proper storage container such as a DOT approved drum and sealed. The filter will hold the liquid hydrocarbon by transfonning the liquid into an easy to deal with solid that will not leach out, even when run over with a truck! For this reason the handling & transportation of the filters is a relatively safe procedure; even if a barrel were to split open after falling off a vehicle, there is little or no chance of any contaminated liquid release. This makes dealing with the disposal of the filters much easier than most common absorbents. No 20 C other materials should be used in place of these special filters and any substitutions will void the manufacturer's warranty. These filters have been evaluated in EPA sponsored NPDES testing for over 2 years and are very effective in removing surface contamination of the water to below 10 ppm. Once the filters have been collected, they may be stored indefinitely and will not evaporate or leach any of the collected petroleum hydrocarbons. In this form we have two options: either landfill the waste filters or incinerate them. We recommend the second option, since there is the opportunity to actually sell the filters as a waste -fuel source. The Btu value of differing petroleum hydrocarbon we have collected is still available in solid form, in addition to the Btu value of the filter itself. By incinerating the filters there is zero chance of future contamination occurring ...... ever. And, the filters can be converted into something useful, like electricity, for the good of the community concerned. It becomes a real `win -win' situation for all Hydro- CartridgeR users should consult with an environmental waste handling professional as well as their Local and State environmental regulatory agency when determining the handling procedures and the proper and legal disposal of stormwater discharge- related wastes. 21 JOB TITLE: vI AYA VISTA DEVQ.QPMENT - PHASE 1 A MN ,�MlTIGATlQN - IEFFE71SON BOULEVARD JOB NO Qf N1419 PLAN REP. P- 3529 SERIAL NO. ICA 96 This Interim Change Authorization constitutes authority for the contractor to proceed with work descdbed below- Interim Change Authorizations are not to be written when it is reasonable to oxpect that the cast change will exceed 10% of the bonded cost Or on projects involving City financial participation. After construction the plans shall be revised by the Private Engineer to incorporate all changes before final acceptance of the eject. Show as separate numbered paragraphs: 1. Ramon for change - (Indicate how and by whom change was initiated) 2- Description of change. 1. Reason for chance - Change initiated by developer to comply with the project water quality requirements- 2. 0 scr otio�n of thanes - added curbside grating basins with 00,MP0- 04► we,5" W%45 - 14ew>L3VL,)(3db Mh locations shown on the attached table. Also included are minor changes of top of curb elevations on warped gutter details. V- darii, of ii r, 4xsThs sloth k, 40'wtooctw„y,� avW -Me. Lhfie " LNAt -% -ids $t'AR ko+ 4004 Lower twwx +'l4 sakt{- rf +W- 13-" C. KmCdfot- ptee- v BMP CATCH BASIN DETAL SCALE: 1" -5' Cf411 � F Pk 5' 400' 5' W =PER PLAN 5' 4.00' 5' towL cc TC 1 I MA (o) TC (b) 1C ,__ _ - - - -- } Qd) -TC e) TC FLOW •.'' __.._. _ .�_ .}. FLOW) N CURBSIDE GRATING BASIN PER CITY -/ 12" PVC-J Oc i' A STD. DWG. NO S- 354 -0, CONNECTOR tMTH *AV:P - OOgL�Lf *Vh 11" CAT" FAA$IN PIPE w1elLT• ucmLT Sit6 9HAu- to 1 -tmi%- ,r new)(IL "t-V V "VMP. SIDE OPENING CATCH BASIN PER- - ibomm of IH9%r -T CITY OF LA STD. 5-357-1 SBAtAI, 1JOT 51tTCNA N t.au T",&*A 7ve sorr -ir rC m INSTALL CURBSIDE GRATING Ci BASIN WITH iNSE-RT ON BOTH SIDES OF MAIN 13ASIN IF SUMP CONOI TION. O F a r ABSTRACT Field Testing Analysis, Rouge River Report 23 Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project Wayne County, Michigan Evaluation of On -Line Media Filters in the Rouge River Watershed TASK PRODUCT MEMORANDUM Nonpoint Work Plan No. URBSW5, Task No. 3 ABSTRACT This report describes the performance of the on -line media filter demonstration pilot project for the period of October 1995 to June 1997. This best management practice (BMP) uses storm sewer inserts to filter sediments and absorb hydrocarbon products from storm sewer runoff before it reaches surface waters. These inserts were applied as a demonstration project in the Cities of Livonia and Westland, Michigan. These BMPs were recommended to evaluate the costs and benefits of low cost. inlet insert type devices for use in existing urban areas. Four devices were tested as part of this demonstration. The sediments and hydrocarbons collected by the four devices were measured and the results of the four devices were assessed. The operation and maintenance (O &M) considerations. capital cost, and estimated O &M costs are also addressed. All four filters performed well during the 19 month evaluation period and were relatively easy to maintain. The results of this demonstration show that the best filter depends on the conditions at the site and the objective of its installation On -line Quality Devices Oil Adsorption Summary Device Average Oil Captured / Gallon Filtered ((mg/Kg) / 1,000 gallons) Hydro - Cart ridge® 9,700 StreamGuardT "' 5,000 GullywasherT " 2,100 Grate Inlet Skimmer Box 700 Device hydro- Stream Gu11y WashcrTM Grate Inlet Cartrid e@' Guard''"' Skimmer Box Estimated 5 "Year x8804980 51,20042,400 51,640 5975 Capital Cost Estimated 10' Year $1,060-1,160 52,400- 54,800 52,840 $1,475 Capital Cost 24 Field Testing Analysis: Rouge River Report 25 THE ROUGE RNERPROJECT Rouge River National Wet A WORLD CLASS EFFORT g 00d jj Weather Demonstration BRINGING OUR RNER BACK 10 LIFE P ro j ect Wayne County, Michigan TASK PRODUCT MEMORANDUM Evaluation of On -Line Media Filters in the Rouge River Watershed Nonpoint Work Plan No. URBSW5, Task No. 3 RPO- NPS- TPM59.00 March 1999 26 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank Paul Geisert (Aqua -Net, Inc,), Henry Happel (Suntree Isles). Paul Renberg (Sonoco), Jorge R. Sainz (Geotechnical Marine), and Joseph B H Smith (foss Environmental) for their assistance in this demonstration project. The Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project is funded, in part, by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Grant #X995743 -01, 02, 03 and 04 and #C995743- 01. The views expressed by individual authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of EPA. Mention of trade names, products, or services does not convey, and should not be interpreted as conveying, official EPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation. Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project is to demonstrate effective solutions to water quality problems facing an urban watershed highly impacted by wet weather and develop potential solutions and implement projects which will lead to the restoration of water quality in the Rouge River. The project will address both conventional and toxic pollutants to • provide a safe and healthy recreational river resource for present and future generations, • re- establish a healthy and diverse ecosystem within the Rouge River Watershed, • protect downstream water resources such as the Detroit River and Lake Erie; and • help ensure compliance with federal, state and local environmental laws which protect human health and the environment. This will be accomplished through the development, implementation and financial integration of technical, social and institutional frameworks leading to cost - efficient and innovative watershed - based solutions to wet weather problems This watershed -based national demonstration project will provide other municipalities across the nation facing similar problems with guidance and potentially effective solutions Rouge River National Wet Weather tvtalch 9, 1799 Demonstration Project Fvnluation of on -Line Media filters in the Rouge River Watershed a --r Ir+w (11) 27 PREFACE The Rouge River and its watershed are a primary source of pollution to the Great Lakes The Clean Water Act of 1972 intended to make waterways "fishable and swimmable" by 1972. Although that goal has not been reached, great progress has been made in improving water quality in most waterways. The Rouge River Remedial Action Plan (RAP) provided a basis for which The Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project (Rouge Project) efforts were created: it identified the major sources of pollution and measured the relative contributions of each The RAP is the continuing foundation for the Rouge Project and presents a framework for addressing the problems within the Rouge River by looking beyond treatment and focusing instead on prevention methods. The Rouge Project was established under the initial Rouge Grant 1 from the United States Environment Protection Agency, Region 5, and enabled Wayne County to mutate a comprehensive watershed -wide pollution- control approach that addresses combined sewer overflow (CSO), stormwater management, and other nonpoint source controls through the application of innovative technologies, progressive financial and institutional arrangements, and creative public involvement and education programs. Rouge Grant 2 provides the framework for the progression and implementation of Project goals as Wayne County continues its mission to develop potential solutions and implement projects which will lead to the restoration of water quality in the Rouge River. The Project will address both conventional and toxic pollutants to: • provide a safe and healthy recreational river resource for present and future generations, • re- establish a healthy and diverse ecosystem within the Rouge River Watershed, • protect downstream water resources such as the Detroit River and Lake Erie; and • help ensure compliance with federal, state, and local environmental laws which protect human health and environment. This will be accomplished through the development, implementation- and financial integration of technical, social, and institutional frameworks leading to cost - efficient and innovative watershed - based solutions to wet weather problems, This watershed -based national demonstration project will provide other municipalities across the nation facing similar problems with guidance and potentially effective solutions Under Rouge Grant 2, the Rouge Project will build on lessons learned from Grant 1 efforts and focus on further integration of the goals of the overall Mission. To this end, Rouge Grant 2 concentrates on the following key Project areas Rouge River National Wet Weather IV Demonstration Prolect MaIC117, 1'J"', Evaluation ni On -Line Media Filters in the Rouge River Watershcd c "`OP11 r-Oi • "'s9 t"' 28 •• Watershed Management will continue under Rouge Grant 2 with the development and evaluation of wet weather and stormwater alternatives, the planning of long -tern monitoring programs, and the ongoing efforts to enhance instream water quality, monitor rain and flow levels, interpret data analysis, and present recommendations. •• Nonpoint Source Pollution Control will provide for the stormwater management, permit applications, and development of financial and institutional alternatives for wet - weather watershed management in concert with enhanced efforts to establish institutional partnerships. Toward the goal of institutional partnering, several community projects will be undertaken with watershed communities. Additional efforts include the inventory of wetlands and measurement of pollutant loads from abandoned dumps and air deposition with possible remediation of some sites. •• CSO Construction Coordination will continue to monitor the construction of CSO demonstration projects established under Grant 1. Additional planning and assistance will allow project coordinators to make additional recommendations on the design criteria of future CSO abatement facilities. •• Public Involvement and Information will reach and interact with more stakeholders, institutions, and regulatory agencies, thus fostering a renewed understanding and continued commitment to reducing pollution, and continuing the transfer of watershed management approaches beyond the project. It will be the central mechanism for transmittal of the Project's Decision Support System tools, processes, and information necessary for sustaining a watershed management support system directly to varied audiences both within and outside the Rouge watershed. Additional information on the Rouge River Project is available from many sources, including the Wayne County Department of Environment (WCDOE), the Rouge Program Office (RPO) Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project MUCH V. I YYY I- valuntion of On-Line Media filters in the Rouge River Watershed x ,P1P?11J,rR,1P11159f10 29 i� 2.0 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (BMP) DESCRIPTION AND APPLICATION IN THE ROUGE WATERSHED. This BMP uses storm sewer inserts to filter sediments and absorb hydrocarbon products from storm water runoff before it reaches surface waters. These BMPs are suitable for small impervious drainage areas. Storm sewer inserts were examined in the Rouge Watershed for the possibility of retrofitting existing small urban drainage areas as a means to provide water quality benefits. These devices are applicable for use in gas stations, small convenience stores, and small parking lots and they have a relatively low cost. These inserts were applied as a demonstration project in the Cities of Livonia and Westland, Michigan. They are the only structures of this kind presently in use in the Rouge Watershed. Filter inserts have been used elsewhere in the U.S., most notably in the states of Florida and Washington. Rouge River National Wet Weather 2 March 9.1999 Demonstration Proiect tivaluntion of On -Line Medin Filters in the Rouge River Watershed F'"n^r11111M'^n11 +Y) nn 30 3.0 ROUGE PILOT BMP PROJECT DEMONSTRATION ACTIVITIES. The Rouge Program Office (RPO) recommended these BMPs for pilot demonstration in order to evaluate the costs and benefits of low cost, inlet insert type devices for use in existing urban areas in the Rouge Watershed. The information from these devices will be used to determine if existing storm sewer design criteria should be modified and if retrofit of existing catch basins with these devices is a viable, cost effective pollution management option for implementation watershed -wide. Four of these devices were tested as part of this demonstration. 3.1 SITE CHARACTERISTICS. This pilot BMP was tested for a period of 19 months at two gas station sites: one at Schoolcraft and Merriman Roads in Livonia, Michigan and one at Ford and Newburgh Roads in Westland, Michigan. Figure 3 -1 contains site plans for both locations. Two catch basins (M I and M2) were monitored at the Livonia site and five catch basins (N 1, N2, N3, N4, and N5) were monitored at the Westland site. Each filter was installed within the catch basin and not within the sewer pipe, so the flow through the filters was only from the gas station tributary areas. The drainage areas for the two catch basins at the Livonia site are 0.16 acres for M 1 and 0.60 acres for M2. The drainage areas for the five catch basins at the Westland site are 0.064 acres for N I, 0.048 acres for N2, 0.125 acres for N3, 0.049 acres for N4, and 0.033 acres for N5. The tributary area to all media filter devices was composed entirely of gas station property and is considered 100 percent impervious. Both locations (Livonia and Westland) had a very similar environment with respect to the type and frequency of traffic and both had a convenience store at the site. 3.2 DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS. The catch basin insert type units selected for this BMP evaluation are presently manufactured and marketed by vendors throughout the United States and Canada. Many of the vendors are located in Florida and Washington due to the interest of local municipalities in this type of water quality improvement retrofit. Several vendors were contacted and four units were chosen for assessment: • Hydro- CartridgeCKI: by Geotechnical Marine Corporation; Hialeah Gardens, Florida. • SireamGuardl`m: by Foss Environmental, Seattle, Washington. • GullinvasherTM: by Aqua -Net Incorporation Seattle, Washington. • Grate Inlet Skimmer Box: by Suntree Isles Incorporation, Cape Canaveral, Florida The chosen devices were selected because they are easy to install, did not require construction and were compatible with the catch basins at the gas station sites available to the Rouge Project for testing these devices The objective of these devices is to provide a unit that can be installed in existing storm water catch basins by simply lifting the catch basin manhole cover, inserting the unit, and replacing Rouge River National Wet Weather l Demonstration Proiect MIUl .. 111 Evaluation ol'on -Line Media Filters to the Rouge River Watershed , rq,-,r,'r ... s9on 31 the cover to its original position. Units are sized to fit the existing catch basins These units consist of materials and structures to capture solids and absorbent media to capture oil products. Overflow outlets are also provided to allow flow through for large runoff events. The design for each of these units is briefly explained in the following paragraphs 3.2.1 Hydro - Cartridge®. The Hydro - Cartridges is a fiberglass filter with an oil absorbing media. Two types of media were tested in this study, WoolzorbT1`1 and RubberizerTm This filter uses standing water to slow the flow through the filter allowing oil to separate to the top and sediment to settle at the bottom of the filter. Hydrocarbon polymer pillows are positioned at the top of the filter to absorb hydrocarbons. A sketch of the Hydro- CartridgetR, is included in Appendix A. 3.2.2 StreamGuardTm. The StreamGuardTm is a fabric filter bag that hangs in the storm inlet from the lid of the catch basin. It is held in place by the weight of the inlet cover on the inlet structure. This filter uses standing water to reduce the flow velocity and allow sediment to settle out. This filter also has one -half inch diameter holes on the side near the top of the device to allow storm water to overflow the filter. Oil absorbing media is positioned in the center of the filter to absorb hydrocarbons as storm water flows through the filter. A sketch of the StreamGuardTm is included in Appendix A. 12.3 Gullywasherrm, The Gullywasher"m is a metal basket with cellulose filter media on the bottom and sides of the basket. Storm water flows into an aluminum funnel and enters a basket filled with cellulose material that hangs below the funnel. During large storm events, the basket will overflow. A sketch of the GullywasherTI is included in Appendix A. 3.2.4 Grate Inlet Skimmer Box. The Grate inlet Skimmer Box is a fiberglass filter with oil absorbing media. The Grate Inlet Skimmer Box has two filter parts: the first is a ring around the top of the filter that contains the oil absorbing media, and the second is a bucket with screened holes on the sides and bottom and open overflow holes at top. Storm water entering the filter first enters the top ring flow around a "boom" of oil absorbing media and drop into the bucket section. The bucket section is designed to hold the runoff from the first part of a large storm or from an entire small storm and slowly release the storm water to the storm sewer through screens. If the storm is large, the bucket fills up and drains through overflow holes at the top A sketch of the Grate Inlet Skimmer Box is included in Appendix A 3.3 INSTALLATION CONSIDERATIONS. Four devices were obtained from vendors and all four were installed at the sites The only structural revision to the sites that was required was the purchase of one new manhole cover with an indent on the bottom side The indent was necessary to allow the grate inlet skimmer box fit properly. The installation of these devices was performed by the RPO team and consisted of removing the catch basin cover, setting the device into the manhole, and reinstalling the catch basin cover Rouge River National Wet Weather 5 Much 9. 1999 Demonstration Project livaluation ortln -Line Mafia Filters in the Rouge River Watershed a +v+'tri+i ,rm ip,,oq nu 32 4.0 CONCLUSIONS. Four on -line media filter devices were monitored for a 19 month period at two gas station sites in southeast Michigan These devices were monitored to evaluate the costs and benefits of low cost, inlet insert type devices for use to existing urban areas in the Rouge Watershed. The Capital costs for the four devices were reasonable, and all devices were easy to operate and maintian. All four filters demonstrated the ability during the 19 month monitoring period to remove some debris, sediment. and oil without causing storm water backup. (With one exception when one filter froze and runoff ponded; this ponding could be prevented with some modifications to the filter ) The results of this demonstration show that the best filter depends on the conditions at the site and the objective of its installation. In terms of amount of sediment removed and retained per gallon of stormwater filtered, the GullywasherT" was the most effective, retaining six times the amount of sediment as the next most effective device. in terms of oil absorption and removal per gallon of stormwater filtered, the Hydro- In was the most effective, retaining almost two times the amount unt - as the next most effective device. • • In terms of O &M, all devices were easy to operate and maintain. The Hydro-Ca rt ridge® and StreamGuardTm were the easiest to maintain. In terms of Capital cost for the device, the StreamGuardT"' had the lowest cost at $40- $80 because the only part is the filter itself The Gullywasher"'M and the grate inlet skimmer box both cost less ($440 and $475) than the Hydro - Cartridge® at $700 -$800. In terms of cost of insert replacements, the cost varied considerably among the filters. The lowest priced is the Hydro - Cart ridge® at $9 each while the costs for the skimmer box, Gullywasher -rm and StreamGuardT"' were $25, $60, and $40 -$80, respectively. In terms of first year Capital cost, the lowest cost is the StreamGuardT"' at $240 -$480. The grate inlet skimmer box, GullywasherT"', and Hydro - Can ridge® were $575, $680, and $736 -$836, respectively. • In terms of labor O &M time, it is estimated that a two person crew would spend approximately one hour per two month period maintaining and checking each device. In southeast Michigan, the personnel cost for maintaining the devices for one year is approximately $240 per device. Rouge River National Wet Weather 19 Match 9, 1999 Demonstration Protect Evaluation of t)n -Line Media Filters in the Rouge River Watershed q n.p`Ipnru�li pnd7 nn 33 Gcd Y Wayne County Rouge Program Office (RPO) MEMORANDUM To: Bob Fredericks (WCDOE), Noel Mullett, Razik Alsawh, Kelly Cave From: Jeff Boerma Date: June 10, 1996 Subject: Progress Report on RPO Online Media Filter Evaluation Project Work Plan URBSW5: Evaluate Traditional NPS Controls TI» s memorandum is to inform interested persons on the progress of this demonstration project and is the first of what will now be quarterly progress memoranda. On -line media filter devices are storm sewer insert devices which are used to catch sediments, filter, aimd absorb hydrocarbon products from the storm water runoff in the catch basin manhole structure before entering the storm sewer system. These devices are not currently used in the Rouge River Watershed. Unique designs of these devices were used in the states of Florida and Washington. Applicability of these devices in gas stations, small convenience stores and small parking lots in the watershed are possible due to their low cost. The Rouge Program Office recommended this Best Management Practice (BMP) type for pilot demonstration in order to evaluate low cost storm inlet insert type devices in time Rouge Watershed. This demonstration will provide information on time benefits and costs of these devices including operations and maintenance requirements. The information from these devices will be used to determine if existing design criteria should be modified and if existing storm sewer inlet manholes should be retrofitted with these devices to provide pollutant removal and the estimated costs of these actions. Currently four of these devices are being tested. Site Characteristics. This pilot BMP is being tested at two gas station sites: one is located at Schoolcrall and Merriman Roads in Livonia, Michigan; the other is at Ford and Newburgh Roads in Westland, Michigan: The drainage areas for the two storm sewer inlets on the Livonia site are 0.6 and 0.16 acre, respectively. At the Westland site there are five storm sewer inlets, drainage areas for these have not yet been determined, but all are estimated to be less than 0.5 acre. 34 Gullywasher Gullywasher is a aluminum basket with cellulose media. The cost of the basket is cheaper as the quantity of similar baskets ordered increases. This is due to tooling cost for each differently dimensioned storm inlet. The cost of a basket when ordering 100 or more baskets is 5440 each. The cost of the cellulose media is approximately 560 per basket. These prices depend on the size of the filter and quantity ordered. Skimmer box The Skimmer box is a fiberglass filter with replaceable filter media. The fiberglass structure costs around 5475 each depending on the size of the catch basin. The media inserts are about S25 each. Concluding Remarks Before comparisons are made about these filters there are a few things to consider: first, the Streantguard and Gullywasher were not in the catch basins as long as the Skimmer box and Hydrocartridge, and second, the exact weiehts, sediment, and drainage areas need to be determined to get an accurate picture of which filter removes more sediment. r All four filters have demonstrated the ability to remove some debris and sediments without causing storm water backup. The only exception to this was when the Hydrocartridge froze and ru::off ponded. This ponding could be prevented with some modification to the filter. s� �ARer studying these four filters for the past six months the Hydrocartridge appears to be the preferred" system. The Streamguard is a sound system, but the cost of continually replacing the filters could become prohibitive. (The manufacturer of Streamguard has indicated that the cost of these filters should be lowered significantly in the future). The Skimmer box requires more than average maintenance to keep the screens functioning; it also has problems with sediment accumulating around the oil absorbing media. The Gullywasher has not been in use long enough to prove its effectiveness. The Hydrocartridge has been more than satisfactory with the exception of the freezing problem which can be remedied with some modification to the filter. Bear in mind sediment removal, a very significant factor, is not considered in these remarks Currently the filters have all proven they can remove sediment without causing flooding. The next question is which filter removes more sediment? and how much does it cost in maintenance and equipment to remove that sediment? To answer those questions these filters will be in place until November 1996. Once the filters are removed a report summarizing the performance of each of these filters will be produced. am 49 MEMORANDUM Miami International Airport Evaluation of the Hydro - Cartridge Tn: Nancy B. Panloja, P.E. Ilead, Airport Engineering FROM: Wilfredo M. Fernandez. P E. Engineer III I _ W1��i�• jFAEM011ANDUM DATE: Augusl 26. I )Qh SUBJECT: (:valuation MAIN d I o-Cal I I idge Drain Filtraholl Demonstration Ilnils 0 This memorandum will serve to inform you of my evaulation concerning the two (2) l lydro- Cartridge Storm Drain filtration demonstration units that were installed at Miami Ilite,national Airport (MIA) on April 26, 1996. The two (2) aformentioned units were installed by Hydro Clean Incorporated in older to evaluate their effectiveness in keeping pollutants, particularly hydrocarbons from entering MIA's internal drainage canals, and subsequently from the reaching the outfalls. The two hydro- cartridges were installed (please see attached photos) at two separate locations, one on the North side of MIA, at the apron on the East side of Building 1036 (Arrow Air Maintenance Facility) and the other one on the South side of the Airport at the East side of Building 2201 (DCAD Airfield Lighting) Both locations were selected due to the combination of existing facilities in the vicinity that could potentially provide a source of hydrocarbons in stormwater runoff, and the existing grading at the indicated locations providing a collection point for any hydrocarbon being conveyed by stormwater runoff. Field observations were conducted during a storm event that occurred the aflernoon of June 20, 1996 (total precipitation recorded at MIA on 6/20/96 was 1.94 inches and the average rainfall intensity during the period of my field observations was 0.18 inches) at both the locations where the Hydro- Cartridges were installed. My field observations confirmed that the I lydro-Cart ridges do not obstruct stormwater conveyance into the drainage inlets where they were installed (please see attached photos). On July 31, 1996, Hydro Clean Incorporated performed maintenance (please see attached photos) at the two (2) aforementioned Hydro - Cartridge locations. Measurements taken of the collected sediment inside the units indicated that insignticants amounts (less than one (1) in. thickness] was present. Apparent hydrocarbon absorption was observed at all the pads inside both the Ilydro- Cartridge units. Hydro Clean Incorporated removed a pad (and then installed a clean pad) at each unit for laboratory testing. Analytical testing performed by Precision Laboratory (please see attached laboratory reports) for the parameter Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (method 9073) confirmed the presence of hydrocarbons at each unit, with the reported result of 15,000 mg/Kg at the pad removed from the inlet East of Bldg 2201 and 24,000 mg/Kg at the pad removed from the inlet East of Bldg 1036. 37 Nancy B. Pantoja, P G August 26, 1996 Page 2 Based on my field observations and the laboratory test results, the Ilydro- Cartridges removed hydrocarbon pollutants from stormwater being conveyed, and do not obstruct the flow of stormwater into the drainage inlets. If installed in a sufficient number of drainage inlets, the Hydro- Cartriges should be effective in reducing the amount of hydrocarbon pollutants that enter MIA's internal drainage canals and subsequently discharge at the Airport's outfalls Periodic maintenance of the Hydro- Cartridge units would be necessary in order to change the absorbing pads, and to remove any sediment collected by the units. In Cite areas where the Hydro- Cart ridges were installed at NUA, there was no construction activity underway, and as a result very little sediment was collected by lire Hydro - Cartridges Additional testing is necessary in order to evaluate the effectiveness of Hydro- Cartridge in collecting sediment being conveyed by stormwater. An important factor in evaluating the possible use of the Hydro- Cart ridge in removing sediment from stormwater and diminishing subsequent turbidity at the receiving body of water is that the Hydro- Cartridge units are portable, and can be relocated once construction is completed in one area to another area where construction activity is proposed. At this time DCAD must decide whether to purchase the two (2) Hydro -Carty idge units installed at MIA Attaclunents cc: P. Hernandez DCAD J. Hamil DCAD D. Smith DCAD L. Lopez - Blaquez DAC KPI Letter from BOCA RATON Airport Authority They were impressed with effectiveness of trapping Hydrocarbon runoff without restricting flow rates. 39 s BOCA RATON AIRPORT AUTHORITY ti � 3700 Air pulIRoad. SWIr #204 Born R(17on. Florida .+34.±1 1'11(407MV1 -2202 Frl( 0171.011 ? ?3X February 28, 1996 RE: Hydro- Cartridges, Storm drain filtration system To Whom It May Concern: Recently we installed Hydro - Cartridges in and around the areas used for fueling of aircraft. They have provided Boca Raton Airport with a pollution prevention device that is in place twenty four hours a day. They Hydro- Cartridges provide additional proleclion to be used in conjunction with our spill kits. Initially we had concerns regarding flow restrictions, but after installing a lest unit in our storm drain, we were impressed with its effectiveness in trapping hydrocarbon runol without restricting flow rates. We have found that maintenance is easily accomplished using our own personnel in just a matter of minutes. Replacement of the absorbent pads is a simple task. Sincyrely,Z') Don Currie Airport Superintendent PRANK KNIASISK 4 (11ARIJ:SSW('K + JACK UAVCNI4)R7' 4 MARY F, W(XM+4 1'11111 P1 .NI, PON I; Y II VRAIAH YK'CfIMA S.(RITAN)/ I AFA41AFA 1161119;F NI VF!• FN Letters from the United States Coast Guard 41 U.S. Department 01 TrarvSPOrUtlon United States Coast Guard Captain of The Pon Mr. Pete Price (Mail Stop 8021 -04) Chlof Environmontol Cngineer Ingalls Shipbuilding P.O. Sox 149 Pascagoula, MS 36652 -0149 Dear Mr. Price: 160 North Royal Street Mob4, AL b8852 Phone: 205 441 6288 JAN 3 On November 15, 1994, the United States Environmental Protection Agency classified the oil recovery material "Rubberizer" as a sorbent, Therefore, this material can be used to remove discharged oil without having prior approval by the Federal Onscene Coordinator, If you have any further questions concerning this matter, or require additional assistance, contact the ENS CYNDI LEDERER at (205)441 -5124. -I-c�- ----__ CJ. y. n, -U.S. --- ptain, Z1.S Coast Guard Federal On -Scene Coordinator Mobile, Alabama Encl: (1) EPA ltr of November 15, 1994 Copy: CCGDB(mep) 42 1i N U.S. Deoarrmeni of Tranipertarian • UnIN4 States Coctt Guard Dear Mr. Dunn: Commanding Officer U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office San Diego 2716 N. Harbor Dr. San Diego, CA 92101 4ft:. 16450 24 MAY 56 This Marine Safety Office utilizes Rubberizer and has found the - Rubberizer product to be very- effective in the cleanup cf--oil &pills of lighter .end products such -as diesel.fuel, and gasoline. Specific use of the product by this office includes pleasure crafts which sink in their slip leaking either diesel or gasoline, where the Rubberizer is placed around the slip, thus cleaning up the fuel from the water and preventing spread of sheen. Additionally, during a remediation project in this port where oil- sheen was leaching from the rip -rip, Rubberizer was used for cleanup due to its effectiveness with lighter end oil products. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback to the manufacturer on products utilized by this office. cerely, A. TSON IV /fommander, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Part 43 Letter from The City of Coral Gables, Florida Thank you for introducing The City of Coral Gables to the Hydro- Cartridge. M. F THE CITY OF CORAL GABLES r, lye .'4 A � �enr Ml plr AfAynI,A PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Mr. Jorge Sainz Geotechnical Marine Corp. Dear Mr. Saint 265 ARAGON AVENUE CORAL GABLES. FLORIDA 33134 July 19, 1995 RE: Hydro Cartridges Since the introduction of Hydro Cartridges to the City of Coral Gables for the past (3) three years we have found them to be very helpful in preventing contamination of paper, cans, oil, and other debris from collecting in our storm drains and trenches. We have installed hydro cartridges around the city in areas where we felt there was a potential for contamination from construction sites. We now have been able to better monitor and protect our drainage systems with the use of the hydro cartridges. Maintenance of the hydro cartridges takes us around (6) six minutes per cartridge once every three to four months and most areas can go up to eight months without cleaning. This has been a savings in labor and equipment since we would have had to jet and vacuum the whole system. We have also found that the new oil socks are easier to mairt - I would like to thank you for working with us in modifying some of your cartridges in order to fit some of our older systems. Sincerely, CJ� Chris D. welling. Streets & Waterways Division Superintendent PO BOX 1.1549 CORAL GABLES FLORIDA 2311, 15AQ 15051 A 6 0 5000 45 Critical Measurements for Grate Inlets E. 5tV441ov W 18612 Saugus Ave., Santa Ana. CA. 92705, (714) 734 -8419, FAX: (714) 505 -2188 <id R.cI .17.eA /.0 1,U�.GT 2DF.[J7 /F /�- OT /o.J �fi0.5 U.eEH� (saa,ozE OP /ZECrA�JCU�.PG� III c 'D' ( zwxo'E) A GRATE r is R!/[T4RE L3oTrOS/J Zi / I / � Dcscci YTioU f�CAJ�/tENE</> I / c...�.vss / ill W A w /oru �(�.US �DGu EDGE Sy 't B LE.UG rN �j�� HETA[ eA CwucLirE DE PN Z i F wi n ry G OPfU /tJC -UiDYN ,�,r/LFTS Or�A.t/T /TY y OPE.✓�.�c LE.eJGT/1 Fri StV44-14'e WAI" 5ou"VI-e 18612 Saugus Ave., Santa Ana. CA. 92705, z �,va ) (G.OF C N E / (sreaeruZE 3orro- ��" _ZN<crs a AaJT /rY hl v `W l Q / (714)734 -8419, FAX:(714)505 -2188 Tw' cF GRATE ire.-' (SC2 /1o71 0.4! Nf /SVREJi'� /� _. (-Y✓ c,r�3T q D /,A 41 rIl2 Er T// /C A- AjE S S D cII•E .r °or7cN F �/,DSN (�✓�tC G /IK lfar) G D aPh' rN /c w'V'F t3 yaac. oe Co.veG e .% jJEo% Length Vs. Efficiency of the Hydro- Cartridge The Short (S), version, The "Preferred Filter' used in the Rouge River EPA Study, is "EXCEPTIONAL" at filtering hydrocarbon because of the extended contact time that the hydrocarbon has with the filter pad. The "S" Version will contain 100% of a small spill of up to 6 gallons, (depending on the size of the Hydro - Cartridge). The Short Version does lack the ability to retain large amounts of sediment under heavy flow conditions. The Medium (M), version, is "EXCEPTIONAL" at filtering hydrocarbon because of the extended contact time that the hydrocarbon has with the filter pad. It is also very efficient at retaining sediment and debris, and has a 100% spill containment capacity of up to 13 gallons, (depending on the size of the Hydro- Cartfidge). The Long (L) version of the Hydro - Cartridge, because of the extended contact time that the Hydrocarbon has with the filter pad is "EXCEPTIONAL" at filtering hydrocarbon like no other!. It is also "EXTREMELY" efficient at retaining several cubic feet of sediment and debris. The long version also has a 100% spill containment capacity of up to 27 gallons, (Depending on the size of the unit). How many flat grate insert filters do you know that will capture even one gallon with out sheen coming through? M FPOM : Advanced Aquatic Products Intl PHONE NO. : 305 292 3771 I flay. 10 2001 12: 3--Pl l F1 Aoivsotn"Avi`�4KAtu -P"A" 7,acrNAC , ;kw, Environnuintal Products to Protect Our World Hydro - Cartridge® Maximum Flow Capacity Aa[A L / teaA"�.d c i' � L[[s I� aa a s ' 1107 Key Plaza, #201 • Key West, Florida 33040 a 305/292.3070 ME {All flow surface areas are Sq In ) (GPM /0" Head) H -C Model k Grate (Flow Through) H-C Flow: Area 2 Area 3 Area 5 Arta 6 Flow Capacity M>Aa 4102 - -- 93.75 76.56 26.25 285 360 4105 -- 165.76 145.2 64.38 63.56 871.7 4120 --- 261.37 218.25 193.73 18916 2,595.6 4155 - -- 272.85 235.2 95.55 93.24 1,2787 4130 - - -- 2400 19775 16330 135.80 1,861.4 DOT E - - -- 41912 360.0 27773 256.25 3,5143 DOT F -- 419.22 360.0 277.73 25625 3,514.3 4605 - 98.28 .90.0 55.89 6036 766.5 4130 - - -- 177.5 150.75 68.74 .70.92 94.7 4170 - - -- 278.30 255.88 168.75 167.40 2,295.8 3100 --- 70.9 57.5 17.68 1911 242.5 3115 - - -- 132.39 111.0 30.97 30.28 415.3 Nda: 71%a above Plow Care.ilY Madmum vdamn auamc no ®dc is in plan Arid it NQefar M Absa7Ne ?3aumum naw'raa (aaaumng 0" o(hod a6uva Ure p'aa). N reoat wx.nMvi ayaana uac pee • is irrnartam to neethn thc'limtng faa6r' of flow rate in equal fidd 11�C use will be the gag now U,roupli a ,Lr are. ' IAII above surface areas rcfer to the diapani bclowl a<u Aa[A L / teaA"�.d c i' � L[[s I� aa a s ' 1107 Key Plaza, #201 • Key West, Florida 33040 a 305/292.3070 ME Notes For Retrofitting and Designing a New Storm Drain Filter Vault System l) It is required that the vault be clear of any obstruction, and that the Hydro - Cartridge have a minimum clearance of two or more inches between the bottom of the Hydro - Cartridge and the bottom of the vault. This allows for water flow, as well as to insure that the filter will install (drop in) easily the first time. 2.) If at all possible, the Hydro - Cartridge should be supported on all four lips by the steel frame of the vault. 3.) If you do not find the required size Hydro- Cartridge for your application, please give us a call We do make adaptors, as well as we will modify and existing model to fit your requirements so that it will fit properly the first time. 4.) Ideally, the longer (Depth), that the Hydro - Cartridge is, the more efficient it becomes. For instance, a vault of at least 48" deep, combined with a Hydro - Cartridge, Model 4130 -L, (24" x 24" x 42 "Deep) is a very good combination. 5.) Keep in mind, that the larger the grate and vault, the larger the filter, the greater its capacity This increased capacity, translates into decreased amount of maintenance and service on the filter. For instance, if you were to increase the grate size from 24" x 24 ", to 24" x 36 ", you have increased the grate size by 501/o, and at the same time, you have increased the capacity of the filter by 50 %, With this filter's "Increased Capacity, "You Have Decreased the Amount of Service Required by 50 %!" By decreasing the frequency of service, your customer will be able to cut his Service Cost by 50 %, which will save him quite a bit of money over the years of life of that filter. If your customer cannot, or will keep up with the constant High Maintenance Cost of a poorly designed filtered storm drain system, he very easily could have the EPA inspector parked at his front door every time that it rains! 6.) The internal funnel of the Hydro- Cartridge can be modified to allow for increased the amount of silt and debris capturing ability. When ordering, be sure to describe the local terrain surrounding the area of the Hydro - Cartridge, especially if it is to be in the area of hill sides, or streets lined with trees. 50 Steel Grate 2 Storm Water Storm Water Filtered Street Curb Parking Lot Storm Water Surface H/C Outlet 2 Sides Approx. jC 8" Head 1 t , ►" t MISM/0 to 3Q Storm Water �00%%�/D I �° H/C Funnel Pipe or Duct to the Curb (Hydrocarbon Spill Containment Capacity) Concrete Storm Water Vault �� ss s 1 Hydro- Cartridge Soil Hydro- Cartridge Secondary Debris Debris Containment Zone Containment Notes: 1. Example for New Designs: Grate: 24" x 24 ", Vault: 36" Dp. Hydro- Cartridge: Model No. 4130 -M, 24" x 24" x 30" Dp. 2. Incoming Hydrocarbon floats on the surface, <IC40` wAUti S�k� to be absorbed by the absorbent filtration pad. -Keep this distance (9" Min.) as great as possible to Parking Lot rt Curb Drainage System give as much head pressure to move the storm water Hydro - Cartridge Filter Installation downward and out through the drain pipe to the curb. DWG.: 2000 -11 -25 Scale: Rev None F Deflector Lip Parking Lot r Curb Storm Water Sheet Flow Inlet Bypass I Curb A-*� Y i i 't ;it i /0 Parking Lot. or Street Curb Deflector Lip —� Steel Grate Storm Water z. J 3 `3 1 �J — Hydro- Cartridge 1 L — Fittered Storm Water Ilk T I k ' � i Concrete Storm—/ Filtered Storm Water —" Water Vault to the City Storm Drain Hydroc - Cartridge Debris Containment Zone Notes, for New Designs QHydro-Cartridge: Model No 4105 -L, 18" x 28" x 42" Dp. 2Q Incoming Hydrocarbon floats on the surface, to be absorbed by the absorbent filtration pad. 3Q H/C Funnel, 20gal. Hydrocarbon Spill Containment Capacity. Section A -A Soil I s7�40' ww Regional Shopping Mall, Atlanta. GA. Hydro - Cartridge Filter Installation Rev DWG.: 2000 -12 -01 A Sheet Flow. Storm Water Head Concrete Storm Water Vault H/C Funnel (Hydrocarbon Spill Containment Capacity) Filtered Storm Water Hydro - Cartridge Soil Debris Containment Zone Notes: 1. Example for New Designs: Grate: 24" x 36 ", Vault: 48" Deep Hydro- Cartridge: P /N: 4105 -1-S, 18" x 28" x 38" Dp. with 6 deg. Slope Lip Adaptor. /2\ncoming Hydrocarbon floats on the surface, to be absorbed by the absorbent filtration pad. 2. Steel Grate Storm Water Storm Water Parking Lot Surface H/C Outlet 2 Sides Flf S �t 4�i it : -:•�i ; F Approx. 3,> 8.. Head j/ncrete Stor � jWater Vault s / H/C Funnel (Hydro- Carbon Spill Containment Capacity) Filtered j Storm Water i E 9 . t s s• ft7 7 T £f j/ / Hydro- Cartridge To the City Street Hydro- Cartridge Storm Drain System Debris Containment Zone Soil Notes: 1.Example for New Designs: Grate: 24" x 24 ", Vault: 36" Dp. w Hydro - Cartridge: Model No. 4130 -M, 24" x 24" x 30" DID. Parking Lot to Storm Drain System 2 jncoming Hydrocarbon floats on the surface, Hydro- Cartridge Filter Installation to be absorbed by the absorbent filtration pad. DWG.: 2000 -12 02 Scale Rey None � Pricing & Available Sizes 51 5tv4ov WAS The West Coast Home of the Hy ro- Cartridge 18612 Saugus Ave. Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714) 734 -8419 FAX (714) 505 -2188 Hydro - Cartridge Sizes and Pricing Schedule As of 10 /05 /2000 _. .-I, .. A...,, ♦1.a Tnn nfthe Crate to the Bottom of the Hvdro - Cartridge. 1VV[e. llllllQllalVU la aan..0 a - — - -- -- - H/C Length Grate Shape Depth Weight of Spill Holding Price Model # S, M, L Dim. Note* H/C Capacity per Unit 4102 - S l4" x 25" Rat. 18" 10 Lbs. 2.4 Gals. $749.00 4102 - M 14" x 25" Rat. 30" 16 Lbs.. 7 Gals. $749.00 — 4105- S 18" x 28" Rat. 18" 15 Lbs, 4 Gals- $799.00 4105- M 18" x 28" Rat. 30" 21 Lbs. 12 Gals. $799.00 4105- L 18" x 28" Rat. 42" 27 Lbs. 20 Gals. $799.00 - --- ---- - -- 4120- M 24" x 36" Rat. 29.4" 23 Lbs. 21 Gals. $869.00 4120- L 24" x 36" Rat. 38" 40 Lbs. 27 Gals. $869.00 ---- S ---- Rat. ---- ---- --- ---- M ---- Heavy -- -- ° -- ---- - - -- 9130- L 28" x 34" Duty 42" 35 Lbs. 16 Gals. $1,059.00 9150- S 29" x 29" Square 15" 13 Lbs.. 4 Gals. $849.00 9150- M 29" x 29" Heavy 31" 20 Lbs.. 13 Gals. $849.00 ---- L ---- Duty ---- ---- --- -- -- ---- S - Square ---- ---- 9151 - M 29" x 58" Heavy 31" 52 Lbs_ 20 Gals. $1,899.00 - -- - --- ---- - --- --- - - -- -- -- -- -- 4155 - M 28" x 36" Rat. 31" 30 Lbs.. 13 Gals $869.00 L ---- ---- - --- -... - --- ---- Type M 35" x 46" Rat. 31" 52 Lbs.. 20 Gals. $1,499.00 N'f! H/C Length Grate Shape Depth Weight of Spill Bolding Price Model # S, M, L Dim. Note" H/C Capacity per Unit --- Tf pe" g" M 40" x 53" Rect. 38" 70 Lbs 20 Gals. S 1.6911) (10 4605 - S 18" x 18" Square 22" 15 5 Lbs 3 Gals. $749.00 .... 4130 - S 24" x 24" Square 23" 13 Lbs. 4 Gals. $799.00 4130- M 24" x 24" Square 30" 20 Lbs 13 Gals $799.00 4130- L 24" x 24" Square 42" 27 Lbs. 22 Gals. $799.00 4608- S 26" x 26" Square 15" 13 Lbs. 4 Gals. $799.00 4608- M 26" x 26" Square 31" 20 Lbs.. 13 Gals. $799.00 --- - --- 4170 - S 30" x 30" Square 15" 13 Lbs., 4 Gals. $869.00 4170- M 30" x 30" Square 31" 20 Lbs.. 13 Gals. $869.00 ---- -- -- - --- 3115 - M 16" Dia_ Round 25" 22 Lbs. 6 Gals. $749.00 3115- L 16" Dia.. Round 36" 26 Lbs. 9 Gals. $749.00 S 23" ---- ---• -- -- 3600 - M & Round 27" 22 Lbs 6 Gals. $799.00 3600- L 24 "Dia_ Round 38" 26 Lbs. 9 Gals. $799.00 3120- S 25" Dia.. Round 25" 22 Lbs.. 6 Gals. - --- 3120 - NI 25" Dia.. Round 36" 26 Lbs.. 9 Gals. - - -- ---- ---- -- -- 3650 - S 23" & 24" Round 25" 22 Lbs.. 6 Gals. $799.00 3650- M Dia. Round 36" 26 Lbs.. 9 Gals. $799.00 ---- L - -- ---- - - -- S 15" Dia. Auger - - -- ---- - - -- - - -- 4102 _ N1 & Hole. 26" 22 Lbs_ 9 Gals. $74900 -_ -- L 18" Dia. No Strict. -- -- ---- - S -- -- Auger Hole ---- •-•- — 4105 - [ 1 24" Dia.. No Struct. 30" 31 Lbs 11 Gals. $799.00 ---- - --- - - -- - -- 53 Operating Accessories Hydro - Cartridge Curb & Gutter Modification: Angled Inlet (6% or 12% Slope) ............................. Add to basic price Each $ 400.00 Hydro - Cartridge Filters: Specially Designed Non - Leaching hydrocarbon specific absorption, 1/3 Gallon Total Capacity. Quadrant Design - One size is designed to fit all Hydro - Cartridge Inlets. Depending on what size is required for your application, each filter will provide the following sizes and quantities from each filter 4 X (4.5" x 10 "), 2 x (4.5" X 20 "), 2 x (9" X 20 ") ..................... Each $ 49.00 Box of Filters (10) $ 439.00 Box of Filters (50) $1,999.00 Suction Hose Nozzle Adaptor: Reduces 8" nozzles to 5" X 11" X 4' Long ...,.... $ 349.00 Extractor Hooks: To lift grates, 24" Long, Steel (One Pair) . ............................... $ 98.00 Adapter Plates: DOT, Double .............................................. ............................... $ 275.00 DOT, Single ............................................... ............................... $ 175.00 DOT, Small ................................................ ............................... $ 135.00 Tax and Shipping Not included. M ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ O District Support Services C—D) ❑ AT- fENTI0t1: Subdivision Engineering (SE) Office of the Director (k 1) Regarding (Finance Number ?�.S DEPOSI EE (Finance Number DEPOSIT T (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ SubmittaVAmended/Corrected Proposed [I Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo• ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved Th7/fPM ❑ Reso ution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report y Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter• ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ hail 4n4rov Sewer ^ syst pB;� %rsesan _ F- yeement rle Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement lam ❑ LSrdim�IL'ti/P[an ChangdAs -Built ProposedM Correct5eAO Approved El Mfg Specs. El Blueline/Red -lined LT Checkpirint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. Grading Plaa �' SbbtaitsaV�l�n Change/As -built Proposed ECorrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc ' ❑ BluelineiRed -lined Check nt Origma Hydraulic Calculations/Map �Cost❑Estimate Soil Report lg/'� Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Note: Seeother blocks for additional items, if any. As Per... For Your Submittal Re 'rements [� Our Conversation ❑ Review Use O Approval ❑ Capital Impro�emenl Projects District Support Services Field Operallons Subcfvision Engineering Traffic Engineering Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ El Comments/Additional Space for Document 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ S) Other Cl 6) Copies to: Additional Notes: _ (PubliclPrivate) (Road/Drainage/W ater /Sewer /Trai VPark/Faci I ity) (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR/ 6 (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633.26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/Inua Trani doc /02 1 199 1 of I To: PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL City of Encinitas 535 So. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: Attached Under separate cover via THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Date: Job No. 05/29/2001 789 Attn: Re: GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION Grading Plan and Street Improvements Copies Date No. Des ' 5 As requested Grading Plan 5 Landscape & Irrigation 2 Preliminary Title Report 2 Cost Estimate 2 Soils Report 2 Site Plan 2 Hydrology Report 1 Submittal Fee Check for $3,450.00 1 Signed Engineering development Application REMARKS: If you have any questions in reference to the above, ase do not hesitate to contact us. James Boeker, Project Manager For approval For your use As requested For review and comment REMARKS: If you have any questions in reference to the above, ase do not hesitate to contact us. James Boeker, Project Manager ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT + ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APPLICATION NO. IOB SITE ADDRESS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. E1 Camino Real & Tennis Club Drive 262- 160 -17 STREET ADDRESS PROPERTY ONVNER INFORMATION GRAi1FR EMINnATI N.* Fnn EDUCATION NAME MAILING ADDRESS En ' CITY, STATE. ZIP CODE TELEPHONE NO CIVIL ENGINEER INFORMATION CONTRACTOR INFORMATION NAM ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE TELEPHONE NO, STATE LICENSE NO. & TYPE SOILS ENGINEER INFORMATION Pasco Engineering., Inc Sladden Engineering NAME NAME 535 No Highway 101, Ste_ A 6782 Stanton Ave., Ste. E ADDRESS ADDRESS Solana Beach CA 9207S(RSR1 59 -8212 Buena Park, CA 90261 - 3 -0952 CITY, STATE, ZIP TELEPHONE NO. CITY, STATE, ZIP TELEPH NE O. 29577 17914 REGISTRATION NO. REGISTRATION NO. DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE GRADING & STREET IMPROVEMENTS CASE NO -� a s SI NAT URE DATE S GNE PRINT NAME -------------------------------------------------------------------- TELEPHONE NO. --------- ------- ------ - - -- -- - -- - - - - -- TYPE OF APPLICATION /FOR OFFICE DATE COMPLETED USE ONLYI DEPOSITS AND FEES PAID ❑ AGREEMENT, COV., DOC. —/ �_ PERMIT /APPLICATION FEE: BEACH ENCROACHMENT. _/_/— PLAN CHECK FEE/DEPOSIT: _— CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONAL PLAN CHECK: _ — ❑ FINAL MAP — / —/— FLOOD CONTROL FEE: -- ❑ FINAL PARCEL MAP — / —/— INSPECTION FEEIDEPOSIT: ❑ GRADING — /_ /— SECURITY DEPOSIT: ❑ IMPROVEMENT — / —/— (CIRCLE ONE OF EACH) ❑ OPERATIONS PERMIT: NEWSRACK — / —/— ASSIGN/BOND ASSIGN /BOND ❑ PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT _ /_ /— CASH /CD/LOC CASH /CD /LOC ❑ SEWER CONSTRUCTION — / —/— MONUMENTATION DEPOSIT ._ F] STREET NAME CHANGE — / —/— RETURN EXCESS DEPOSITS TO: ❑ STREET VACATION — / —/_ ❑ OWNER DATE: ] TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT — / —/— ❑ CONTRACTOR AMOUNTS ❑ UTILITY CONSTRUCTION — / —/— COMMENTS: ❑ ENGINEER May 24, 2001 DCM Properties Attn: David Meyer 619 S. Vulcan Ave., Suite 206 Encinitas, CA 92024 Pursuant to our conversation, this letter is to serve as authorization to submit grading plans for the Grauer School project (Case # 01 -016 MUPMOD/DR/CDP/EIA) without the resolution of approval, which has been completed and will follow once signed by the Chair of the Planning Commission. If you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2712. Sincerely, Tom Curriden Senior Planner Page 1 of 1 Pasco From: "David C. Meyer" <dcmeyerl @earthlink.net> To: <jboeker @pascoeng com> Cc: "Wayne Pasco" <wpasco @pascoeng.com> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:58 PM Attach: 01016MUP.GRD.doc Subject: FW: PC /CDP Resolutions Jim, Attached is a letter in Microsoft Word format from Tom Curriden which allows use to submit for plan check without the executed PC & CDP resolutions. Please print out and include this memo with your submission. What else (other than the check) do you need to submit. It is imperative that we submit ASAP. Thanks, -David Forwarded Message From: "Tom Curriden" <TCURRID @ci.encinitas.ca.us> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 14:31:47 -0700 To: <dcmever1 earthlink.net> Subject: Re: PC /CDP Resolutions David - Please find attached a letter of authorization to submit grading plans. I will get you the final resolution once it has been signed. Thanks, Tom - - - - -- End of Forwarded Message May 25, 2001 City of Encinitas 505 So. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Engineering Dept. RE: GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION To Whom It May Concern: PE 789G Please be advised that Pasco Engineering has been retained to act on my behalf for processing the Grading and Street Improvement Plans on the above referenced site. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, David Meyer s:. STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA, INC., SAN DIEGO DIVISION 3111 CAbNINO DEL F.IO ?N. ,".-900 SAN DIEGO, CA. 92108 t� (619) 692 -1600 .a w PRELII -M!ARY REPORT AUGUST 29, 2000 STEWAR.T TITLE ESCROW 3111 CAMINO DEL P.IO NORTH #900 SAN DIEGO, CA 92100 ATTENTION: MARY ANN MAY 2 9 2001 YOUR N:; - 2011179 OUR NO. 06- 0200739 LOAN REF: GRAUER IN RESPONSE TO THE AEOdE REFER ? ?LICATION FCR A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, STEWAR T TITLE OF =._: _?_ +L A, INC. , SAN DIEGO DIVISION HEREBY REPORTS THAT IT IS TO ISSUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, A POLIC'.' POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE BY STE ART TITLE GUARA.N Y COMPANY, T= SCRISING THE LAND AND THE ESTATE OR INTEREST THE3VT_N HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, INSURING AGAINST LOSS AIHICH MAY BE SUSTAIEED BY REASON OF A_W DEFECT, LIEN OR ENCUNBRANCE NOT SHOWN OR REFERRED TO AS A_N EXCEPTION IN SCHEDULE B OR NOT EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORMS. THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCL:.S_o FROhI THE COVERAGE OF SAID POLICY OR POLICIES ARE SET FORTE HEREIN. COPIES OF THE POLICY FO LKS SHOULD BE READ. THEY ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THIS REPORT. PLEASE READ THE EXCEPTIONS SHOWN OR REFERRED TO BELOW AND THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS REPORT CAREFULLY. THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS ARE MEANT TO PROVIDE YOU WITH NOTICE OF MATTERS WHICH ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY AND SHOULD BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THIS PRELIMINARY REPORT IS NOT A WRITTEN REPRESENTATION AS TO THE CONDITION OF TITLE AND MAY NOT LIST ALL LIENS, DEFECTS, AND ENCUMBRANCES A77ECTING TITLE TO THE LAND. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS F-- - "ETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILT_TATING THE ISSUANCE 07 A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY O? TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMSMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. AS OF A`J ' ET 21, 2000 AT 7:30 A.M. CHRIS BURGIO BOB CROFT TITLE OFFICER TITLE OFFICER i AWA Than!< you for usi: g STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA, INC. SAN DIEGO DIVISION For !'.•.a__c-- this -e`ort ✓!case cCntact the f0l_0`..4 no Chris Surgio, Title Officer . . . . . . . (619) 253 -1678 ext. 3057 Bob Croft, Title Officer (619) 243 -1676 ext. 3055 iMichelle Ella - Blake, Assistant , . . . . . (619) 692 -1600 ext. 305E Sales Dept . . . • • • • • • • • • . . . . (619) 692 -1600 ext.-0 Payoff Dept (619) 692 -1600 ext 3018 or FAcsimile N ='-er . . . . • • . • . . . (619) 297 -1715 WIRING INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUB - ESCROW 1. Union Ban:: of California 530 "B" Street San Diego, CA 92101 2. ABA #122- 000 -596 3. Credit: Stewart Title of California, Inc. San Diego Division 5. Account #9120055632 5. Reference Title Officer and Order Number NOTE: If this Company is to payoff a Deed of Trust securing a Line of Credit, Additional Advance, Construction Loan or any other type of loan with future advance ca_nabilities, we require that these accounts be frozen at least 58 hours prior to closing. Failure to freeze such accounts may delay closing and payoff disburs_*ents Tf we are to payoff a Deed of Trust which contains any type of Foreclosure Costs, Dlease advise your Title Dept. as these must be verified prior to closing. if you have any q _,estions regarding payoffs please contact the Title Unit or Renee Roskos in the Payoff Dept. "For Information regarding the Stability and Financial Statistics for Stewart Title of California, Inc. San Diego Division, please contact: Kathy Biewenga, Division President, (619) 253 -1666 06- 0200735 THE FORM OF THE POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS R°_P0RT 1. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANOARu COVERAGE POLICY (X) 2. A_.:RT_CA_, _A`:= TI='__ ASSOCIATION OWSER'S POLICY FORM B ( ! 3. AMERICA=S LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION POLICY 4. AMERICAN _AND TITLE ASSOCIA -ICN S. LITIGATION GUARANTEE 6. "GOLD" COMPREHENSIVE PROTECTION TITLE INSURAINCE POLICY RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE LvA_ ^: POLICY ! RESIDENTIAL ( i 7. "GOLD" COMPREHENSIVE PROTECTION LOAN POLICY SCHEDULE A 1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A FEE 2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: AMDAL RESIDENTIAL CARE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 06- 0200739 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND IS DESCRI5ED AS FOLLOWS: THE EASTERLY 493.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCR :SZD LAND: THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER. OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; AND THE NORTH QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTIO_`i 23, TO'riNSHIP 13 SOUTH_, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, S'T'ATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTHERLY 335.00 FEET THEREOF SCHEDULE B AT THE DATE HEREOF, EXCEPTIONS TO PRINTED EXCEPTIONS JUND EXCLUSIONS POLICIES WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 06- 0200739 COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY OR GE \SP:=._ AND S ?❑ : :AL COUNTY AND /C.. CITY TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2000 -2001, A =N NOT YET PAYABLE. !A, GENERAL AND SIEZIA_ YEAR i99> -2000 INCLUDIN3 FIRST INSTALLMENT: SECOND INSTALLMENT: LAND: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPT. CODE AREA: PARCEL NO. COUNTY AND /OR CITY TAXES FOR THE FISCAL PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX, IF ANY. $2,482.21 PAID $2,482.21 PAID $460,000.00 $0 $0 19000 262 - 160 -17 1S THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES, IF ANY, ASSESSED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3.5 (CONYSNCING WITH SECTION 75) OF THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 2. RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC IN AND TO ANY PORTION OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED LYING WITHIN ROADS, STREETS OR HIGHPiAYS. 3. AN EASEMENT PURPOSES STATED IN FAVOR OF: FOR: RECORDED: AFFECTS: AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE HEREIN AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY POLES, WIRES AND ANCHORAGE FOR THE TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRICITY JANUARY 16, 1951 IN BOOK 4718, PAGE 454 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, DISTANT THEREON 22 FEET WEST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 0 030'38" EAST 2552.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 005'23" EAST TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, c AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF: OLI_VENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR: PIPELINE OR PIPELINES AND CONDUITS RECORDED: MAY 3, 1961 AS FILE NO. 76614 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE EASTERLY 20 FEET OF SAID LAND 5. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF: I THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FOR: PUBLIC ROAD SCHEDULE S 06- 0200739 RECORDED: I APRIL 11, 1967 AS FILE NO. 52086 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE EASTERLY 63 FEET SAID INSTRU:,'ENT ALSO GRANTS THE FIGHT TO EXTEND AND hAINTAIN " *-`"' STRUCTURES P=iD EXCAVATION AND EMS V:CME::: SLOPES BEYOND D. LIMIT THE LIhLTS OF SAID RTC--'T OF W F Id'cinRE REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTIGDI AND N:.:�INTENANCE . E AN EASEMENT AFFECTING TH °_ PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN Al�D 7N'-ID=N7TAL PURPOSES, SHOWN OR DEDICATED BY PARCEL K:AP NO.: 2162 FOR: PROPOSED 20 FOOT PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT AFFECTS: THE NORTHERLY 20 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 435 FEET AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP 7. A *; EAS=-vENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF: JESSE JOHN LUX FOR: ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY RECORDED: JANUARY 2, 1974 AS FILE NO. 74- 000038 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE NORTHERLY 20.00 FEET SAID EASEMENT HAS BEEN GR;NTED AND RESERVED IN VARIOUS DEEDS OF RECORD. A. WE WILL REQUIRE _.-...ED BELOW IN ORDER _= FECT OF DOCWMZNTS, =. -TEAS WHICH =_ NOT ^c EXT_S— -lmy '._w THERSON 06- 0200739 REQUIREMENTS STATEMENT OF l FO:VL2,TION FROM THE PARTIES TO COMPLETE THIS REPORT, BASED ON THE PROCEEDINGS, LIENS, DECREES, OR OTHER SPECIFICALLY DES_.. -DE SAID LAND, BUT WHICH, AFFECT THE TITLE OR IMPOSE LIENS OR _.-R I ALL PARTIES THE S_-._E ._ -.- OF INFOR :' =-- ,r Is NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE SEARCH =_J L: =..._- .__G2. OF T___E ORDER. TITLE SEARC- ` _LU :=� := ---ERS THAT RE 1NDE ED EY NAME ONLY, AND HAVING A COMVLZT -D STATEMENT OF INFOR`4,TION ASSISTS THE COMPANY IN THE ELIMINATION OF CERTAIN MATTERS WHICH APPEAR TO INVOLVE_ THE PARTIES BUT IT: FACT AFFECT KNOTHER PARTY WITH THE SAME OR SIMILAR NAME. BE ASSURED THAT THE STATEMENT OF INFORMATION IS ESSENTIAL AND WILL BE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL TO THIS FILE. THE FAILURE TO SUBMIT THE COMPLETED STATE:•.ENT OF ID ENTITY AT LEAST 10 DA'I'S PRIOR TO CLOSING MAY RESULT IN A DELAY OF SAID CLOSING. B. IT IS OUR COMPANY POLICY THAT ALL TITLE FEES DUE ARE DEDUCTED FROM AVAILABLE PROCEEDS. IN ADDITION, ALL TITLE CHARGES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE AT THE TIME OF RECORDING. C. ALL FUNDS NECESSARY TO FULFILL PAYOFF REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING OF TAXES, MUST BE RECEIV20 AND AVAILABLE FOR DISBURSEMENT AT THE TIME OF CLOSING. D. NOTE: THIS COMPANY WILL REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING TO INSURE A LOAN BY OR A CONVEYANCE FROM, THE ENTITY NAMED BELOW: ASIDAL RESIDENTIAL CARE A. A COPY OF THE CORPORATION BY -LAWS OR ARTICLES. B. AN ORIGINAL OR CERTIFIED COPY 07 THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBJECT TRANSACTION. E. NOTE: THIS COMPANY WILL REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING TO INSURE A LOAN BY OR A CONVEYANCE TO, THE ENTITY NAMED BELOW: GRA.UER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION A. A COPY OF THE CORPORATION BY -LAWS OR ARTICLES. B. AN ORIGINAL OR CERTIFIED COPY OF THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBJECT TRANSACTION. 06- 0200739 SCHEDULE H - Continued TITLE OF THE VEST= HEREIN WAS ACQUIRED BY DEED RECORDED 2RIOR TO SIX bIONTHS FROM THE DATE FEREOF. THE TAX RECORD DISCLOSES TMPROVEZ:7NTS THEREON DESIGNi?.TED AS: VA'CF�iT LAND . CLTA PRELIMINARY REPORT FORM LIST 07 PRINTED EXCEPTIONS A-N-.) EXCLUSIONS SCHEDULE B -,!T:,E xSSOCIAT:r-l', S-:-N`D;,R:) cov--?-AG-- POLICY - 1990 wx:Lus--o! S F=.! COVERAGE N:7 PAY Icss IR -F F. m '7 IF 7- :Iv F F w , m M A FRC A7 CA7- Cz Be iA AB:"- THAT A NO. 1 :7 ZF -'v H7 Asl=-NL A V:-LA7:-2; CF. ALL_ :;T:: A =ATZ I- - -,= -::: A7 CA:. -F.S -.,<-rRc:s-7 R7::R-S: P.:B CA CF I D BE N= r.X:*_*;C:N�; RA� -AK:NG , F:0-75 CV A p%w—, L:v Az:�As- IR C.UV MIA...73 R-::M.zS A- :A:r N-7 Y-N:w:: 7-1 N-- v=:m:-: -'N 31= A7 :A.r IF ;,;L. NZ7 ::SCLOS-2: :N WR:-:N-, T0 C-M;AN( By -,, - ..7 CA-7 -.'xz CA- ;.%:CR TO T"- -IRS CF 1:rS,.7mz- C— 7. LOSS CA7 C C-. CRTA7:z CI.Anw;': H;.] PA:D FOR MCA.:Azz CR :7Y or 7�.T IF A CF A. CF. W:-H :a A: C S, z *5 N-SS S-A7- :NZ; p,_ - - i -a-- OL;-. CT -:Hr- := - T ::.:-e Cm T�Z 1 0- OR CLA:m ww:c. A-R. c.. -N. C-C-A.3 S-e MC.,71SAG- A27 is BA': us"t IF. ANy CONSIUNER CR--M:- PRO-.7-cT.CN CR IN -Ezr::N'G LAW. lNSLR70 By TH I S VSS--NO ::: :,Z A::E OR ANe CIA:M, wR:CH A-�:Srs 01. -HE THE Op7RA,:ICN OF ;01-CY CR THZ TRA: :SA=C'� OF -THE BY REASC.V OF -Z: -Al BXVKRI:;- Cy. S-.A` INS--VSNc", OR SM:LAP. CFZD:-.CRzl ...e5. - EXCEPTIONS FROM COVEPJkG7- x- FAT COS-S, A=CRNzy- 77r3 CR CCES N"T INSUR E A;A:N LOSS C2 a CA:,�, !A::z �H- WILL WH:CH Aa:SE By RZMC.N OF: CR ASSSISK:Yrs W.j:C. ARr 0-, S='a�.j AS ZX:37:NG L:-::s as T- R--:sR=s 07 ks! THA. :AXES CR ON REAL. PACPER.Y CR BY THm F .- _ !: t =nS. z NOTICES OF S'�CH PFCC--::NG3, 71 0.. pRz:Cz=..:NGS By A PVZL:C AZ-.NCf :ZH :A'! R-S:: A'SZS�M-N.s. Z-:.,:y OR By P� Mm . - - ._'-H ?. CF, NC: SH-%!l BY THE As=R=S SUCH x - - '- :: R.:-Rzs. APE Pn-:C 1-:3P75 BU-' WHICH C-U- 3Z :.=ZRTS.S C� C:-A -XS WH:C.. -- . - - H::., Y.A, BY AN rN3;E-.::N W.. C.R CF. CU:xs WI.:: - N' zy gT RZCZF=S. IN L:NT-S. SF:m-AGr IN ;-m- .._•_.._ CR ANC 0:-'-R FACTS WMCH A Amt- N '� :7 Su:t m'." 'A u---Tz NC :.A —rR3 EXCT;.TZ L, ---R .A (B; OR -5- Cr -X:7;7::ss A:.- T X.! S=Nm Cl-!.-:N•.;_: ON NEXT PAGE, STERPJRT TITLE GUA-RA-NTY COMPAtrl RT7, I..: PA3- 11 c- CLTA pRELT-MINARY REPORT FORM 2. )L%rz-RICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87) EXCLUSIONS -- -,. ASA:ns- 'C'-. COSTS, a FEES. X:ro Fp--A; OR zo _N:3 VA. .1c7roll Lm: -c- 3- THE .s:- V:�LA7.-Ni CA 3 AT 2 A_.7 TZ -AXE A OF T-- 7-E_:Z CS C!: PL::! DATE HAP;--:;' : ;n::m To 'ZF.T- PC:,:=? -A7 Y:u SOUGH. X-- "NO W..'Rot.7 OF THE 3 -,77_7 R:SXS ---k- Wv- -ZZZ - S! YOU CA AM. Z Y:V. S'T HEY A; ;7;R-: 'N THE PV8:':c T. -S'_LT IN NO L:35 M YOU Azrrz-1 YSn T:T-z AF-r'. PC-:Cy :AC- :.:Y,:-. .ASR ;"To -.X -Z3 I-V 1- 3 Cv C��"EAS A:S 4. FAILURE TO PAY VALVE FOR Yc'LR TITTLE. S. LACE CF A ;L:Z,*. 3 C� i A CA Z -C wf :�ANZ cu-.S::)E �' A7ZA S;r STRZT-S. CA Wx7rawAYS VaA- YO-UR CCES NOT -':X:T A=zr--- cvj--F-�3z -,; -3. I-T.A 5 0- C:,'rj7Z: ::._ P:S' .13 r EXCEPT-TONS FROM COVERAGE -x:s FIL:cy OcEs so- INSURE A:;A:NS- LOSS OR MIAC-- (AND THi CCMPA:rf FILL NOT PAY COSTS. A ---ZN-YS' FEES OR EXPENSES) W:C-N )R.'Sz By REASM! C ::!IS :�l P`SSZSS:CN OF T-T Lkm NOT s 1. R. -Y IN-EREST.S. OR CLA:MS OF PAR. -ow By 1%rE V;RLIC RSCoPmS. 2 A...y EA�ZmINTS CR LIENS N-- EHCFN BY THE Pt;----:Z: RE:ORZS TH:S COES NOT L-M:- THE LIEN In ITEM 8 OF -.E msxs- CO.iERE: T:,- 3. krf F THE "M WH:CH A CORRECT SL a WOUL:: C!SCL--SZ WD 'dF:CH XAZ NC- SAC:.? BY pLr.- :C RECORDS. Tl:S CO- S NOT LIMIT THE - F-R :3� REMOVAL COZAG- IN ITEM 12 OF COt cdcD TITLE R:SKS. LA� --F cz 4 X.7 WA-.T-;k R:Sm-s CA C:A:.Ms CR NC7 S— T BY TH .:7:.- IG MATE?. IN CR LIN-ER TIE- -0. (LIST or E*(CT;- A. -t:s:c:ls Mr:YVED oil !:-X. FAZE; STEW A7%7 TITLE GJ,*--RA-NTY COMPA371 PA5E 2 CF S 3. A-MERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10- 17 -92) WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT - FORM 1 COVERAGE ANN) 7.%=-RICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIAT_IONi LEASZY.OLD LOAN POLICY (10- 17 -92) WITH ALTA EN ORSEMENFT - FORM 1 COVZ ? ?.GE EXCLUSIONS AND COVERAGE .. '- __ '. ASC'.':,- ! _..-_-- : -C I.`: -..: 7- ..- -._- OF ._ _ ,. __. __ _. _. _ _..__. _. .__ ?_n'_ .G FR:Y. A V:::.ACLC= I . A. _- _ -- .. : -._ _. '..= _iC�.C_., r�.n =_.: C__r_. _ r_a_.0 Rc - -P75 0.C] G s?. _.. .:. =:..r ._.. :.... _..- '�+=::_- _�= C�___. _..._ Or F]_. -. n.._:a ?�.:A7- : v `_:C _cr ._ a -... _... b.. _ _b CY INS'9 ___CP • -•_r C i.`1S.PED M -. :7.._- -C':cR 5:.:7:- CR'! ^L.3a FCR S- a ?.V. -_S. LAE -A OR MA7- -R:AL CR _..: _.: -._ __ .- :.- RC ...... .. .... ......].._ -S :_- a R__: :....._.- z...::5 L::D R EP CC::S::_C::S: C _. -__ _. - '- - __- _ - FA VA=S ..... _.... __ .._. -. - - - 37- - _ .,� ., : -_ ...__ ._ -- :G __._c c__ .aa :..7 ... _._.:. r:.:r.. _.-_ T -- I;:STr. AT _.._.. -._. OR F..__. _ _ -_ _.L_..- „n.$R Or ..- _... C_a. T7 C.M:_Y n.:H A ?T :C -':] - ':S.'._an LAWS OF T..E S7A7- IS a: _:- : -C .:.VC :S S: 6'A:E7- S. !Nl.AL:::: -'! CR 11 S::F:RC_..a__IT'f OF : _ �' ... -.S _.. =..�E] XCR:O:.CE, OR 0�.:''. : -_ _C?. %`:C: AR:3zS CLT OF _.._:... -_ BY THE LNS,. Y :. A: IS SASE] CFO`: VS =7 C7 A'! CC:f<pp,_1 CiSCI: FRO:EC:LCN OR LAW .-CR SEP':: CES, LAECR OR Ml.- ER:AL3 ;CR :nE CLAIM OF PR:ORI76 Cr ....! STA7L :OR'! LIEN FOR S'R':'Gi. v -C ?. C:...+ -3R: +LS OVER n L: E^ CF THa I::S:� MCR:O:..^.E: AR:S ISO i'._..:,a IMFRO' /EYZ:fT OR �1C ?:< S CO:CRACTT_7 FCR A.,= C-^CAZ tCE] S'YSSE: :n' TC CA, CFv F: L. C! A\'C IS :1CT F:NAVCEO IN n -.._E CE - -__ _. - ".___S Cr T ' fNC E37Ea: a3 SEG7.ED E'f T. -.- INSURED +:: R:O:.i'c':': Ci A? CA:E Ci FCLFCT rA:': IS CEL. A:EJ :C ADVA¢La. -. .. 7. A:r! cv..... .. -.__: =.: -_- �r7 ::.E :iAL: =A -:Ca CZZA:.N - -E - -:Ea7 C? :i.= . _P:::.0 -Z .:.a�RED e! .a:5 x-_:_f. S. :. E..S:N CF`:..a'C;rr AT__.N C r_._i:L RA:.-i(PCFTC'f` STA.- :NSCLVENC!. CR 5:. °. :w CREDITORS' R:GH:S LAWS. :...: .a EA. 7-- CB: U, . -E ._.... L'i.EAT C7 .:- .. a_ -. =, M: =.: ARE- aE:::3 --_. _- A F:•.= u:. IT C7N'IEYAtiC OR F.a_. 7-, -a..: TRANSFER- C ?. .... 7 -= E'.. _,: NA:__.. :nC ..•- =..ESC :.= L'::C_.:C ?.- +.. +__ n_ A RESULT : .. .......C:: i'r._ CCC: R.9_ CR ___ __ _ _.. E. - -...: 7:.E .... _ _ _.._.:.__ !^.C:.::A___ v_..•u _._.__ - r._:== =. -iAL 7._t._ __ [._ :_ �... .. .... .: .a rr.G] 3 c: i "N ..F.l.: ._ A r. _:USER F:R VA:. __ C.. A : tea. = :, OR LC Ea C. E_.:CP.. C. ?RaE' E:(- 90 - " ^.:5 Ab7 E:( _.S:'>:= CCS -::r-: C :: =7 PA -.E) STEWART TITLE GUA.RANT'L CONSPANiY IV GLTA PRELIMINA= 3G-;.- pCLlCY F=?`:S YA . 5 CS.ZAA:T CA Ex-ENZE= = t_oe. t:; xz2:__C.v TO H S.CZLus:ous FRcm FA-M A CO-11IRACE PC:.:CV W:'_L FoLLcw-!;G CE: ;=AA- Ex - _z;. :_Ns. 7S FRO:'? . _ ! CO✓ERAGE Th:S FS:.::! CC75 ;AV C0ST3. W.:j AA -7: .=_:: A 7--7- ..... . 7-- c=-Z 9- 7 Az:- 5S A: CC) 7 mA7 E .S' C., x 7 4. A!.=R_--CAN L.;,N-D TZTL° ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10-17-92) ;LN—.) A1.43RICAN L;J,—;) TITLE ASSOCIATION LEAST—HOLD OWNER'S POLICY (10-17-92) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE :55 CA AT., ::- :.:A:7Z3 TO A.ND zzN:\,o IA) AN-V LAW, Cs=::. :7:NC CA Rl_A7::;O THE C--*;kNCY. LAWS. CA 'ZI NZ�; CA CA C- _Szct7: CA AFrA aF 1:1:1 A __- .3.'.:. ---z C, TH! L;,::: :3 Cz A ;A-.. CA -TTC- I CA xl: ?;�R: -D 7-�- A�.r V:0-1-.:Cv C. CR;.:=czS CA GO; V: C CA A NC_m:Z A CErm. CA CLA7 CA ALLEOZ= V:OLA-102: A r. S=, A NCT:C-. TF. (B, A:N =VER'`IZ-�iAL K, plw--R uz- Z7 A: AZc7_-. sx-, rc. z _l_iElECF OR A 7rc= OF DEFECT. Acm A vx:�A-=1 OR xLL_O_-D A -7. LIU.N, CA AT 7z V.,OLA-IcWl A;-zc7:.%* 7 . - . - Y LA:M FAS S..N REZOR:" IN' THE F'.S:.:C A. CAT= OF PCL:c 2. R:cx-.s OF ucyA: - . gX"=: S 7 - -- 7 1 OS UNLESS Nc::-r CT �._ =.,; VL:C RECCRZED I.N T, PL7 R7CCP_ A. =H. DATE OF FOL:c�, S.7_' y__ "_=N�; c:7.7RRED PR:.:?. C DA 7Z OF ;CL:CY WH. _zw WCULD BE CIN 7- -R .R 'GF..S OF A pm__:AST T_z VA-= •:71, Lr. 3. DEFECTS, LIENS. A:' ;E -_lST CLA:'MS OR C"' N 7.rks - - .. '�;S,,Z LA W CREATED, ASS.��V= CA AO"ZO -0 3V �'�Z : C IS THE P.7L;C R--00?.:t AT DATT OF TOL:Ce• S., THE (W VOT Y-Vcw.; TO _KE �4. — - 'UR-D :A= TRT :NSL7R__D cimA:y.A_N_ A.�_ Nz- TC THis CC.mpk::lf Z:t_ I4SLRZ7 CZA!AA::7 SZZA.l AN V;S'�ATD PC-:c Y. - (C: RESULTING IN NO L..:5 OP. CAYA__ 7. iNSURZ: CLA:Y.A:.7; OR cl.- S�,Bs __ N7 .0 ZA.- OF 7_: Cy; CA :E) RESCL - :YO SS LO55 -A WE v ZR :A}=7 W.,i:_- %*CT KA•Z STF:: S_S-A:%'= ENSURE F:.0 VA FOR THE ESTA-Z CR I PCL:cY. 4. Aczy CIA:m, Wr!:C,..' 12: 5' T�iT ESTX-- CA INS:RZ-1 BY VZ37::z IN, T?is TH:5 BY AT-Ac::: ":T RA CA -OZS- L R:3K_S LAWS. IS C:; f.: T-r- 7%AS :SAC7:O!: v. 7H:s ;C- E=:::c CA 7- CA, --x-z A pRzTzAs!rIAL E37A:- CA :N71'as . :::s ;CL:cy SE:.NG C-.-- E_.xzmT_ W"--- :RA::SFr- As 7,.:M FA:LURs- -1 A E C z -1.) (S: OF 5=` -C A x:- CA A JLMCIME -_ C L: A Av:C zx=_:S_:Na ON 7.7.- ;Asz� OF Ex�:_ RZ% 19" STEWART TITLE GU;LR-A—`rry COMPANY PAO- 4 Or 6 CITA PRELIMINARY REPORT FORM - - A . E.�- - : —:J =. - - - - , - ,ss'�:ZD To AFT�R7 E:-HZa STA�MAR� C"-'T?ACr C EX C:; .0 V -,:VT - F=�S 0A01 32 PC L :.:'f EXCL:S::.%S FRCM CC-iE?AZ;T-. THE SX:--n:C::S FROM CCVIRAZE ::: A C Z F:L:- Fn-c4:vc rx:rp.:CNS: EXCEPTIONS FROM COV=-?,AGv- W:L' m 0. N= ?A'! C.S.S. A=:R�7!5 I AA:Z !krAs::: U: As 7:3 Or ;C; _A;' ':;c ARE T..A. 7Ans CR A-3-35. . 7-' Be A F=Cns -mr W�-:- B�7 W�::.� =ULZ a-- -A= C7 cam._.: cr- n..: NH:CH iS- wb, 3, za 5. CLTA HOXZOWN�-R'S POLICY 07 TITLE INSU-R;oTCE (6-2-98) ALTA FOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE IlT=L,;CE (10-17-93) EXCLUSIONS -,:Ll Aar :NS7F.-O A:A:.%S- LCSS, C'S-.S- fs FEES, Va. T- OF cr ;v! Z7 scvvu.74-:C TK: S zcvza:�.: . - -N— '4S A::r KEZ :t.A7-rNs C. c. `—=L: -Nc LA:'m r:v:s:-.v Timl CR —'s ;12PL.Y TO V:CLX-:Z:;S CA C= A.-r-s IF VOT:Cz OS THE VZGL.A- ApPS:ARS IN THE PUBLIC FTCCR=5 A7 THE 7OLICY DATE GOES NGT L:M= 7----Z CCVE?AClT DTSC;':z I!; CO -a. :SK 'j. 17, CR 24. H I-V AC -cKC;LVC- WI - ZX A?9 I" CA=Z -A :NG ST- Cm- I. ,?.ES, cp. ;LVf ;AE. OF T—mm. TO BE C-NSMUC-3- T V:O FA!LL'qE OF YOU EX: ='::L3:NG CODES :H:s EXCLUS V:CLA-:ONS OF BUILDING CODES IF NOTICE 0. T— LAZON .04 CCV- NOT APP'y -0 --- - DO' ':-, A7;TAAS IN THE PL�--'C 7SCORCS A- ':..- Lr . DATE. 7. -.xZ RICH- To lA:;_- BY =fZVJC;:N'G :.C.:,:- Or EX -.HE ;;C, APPEAls C;,.-; CR A. THE LA: S. TNT TAK:mG F-kppz.,IED BEFCUE THE POLICY CAd:r- IS E:vC:KG ON YOC IF YCU SCL'GHr HE 'M W:THCtrr JLNCW:,c Or THE TARING. Z.:3KS; j- :�7' -XT'f A-?EA2. IN 2L�-:-:C qZCOp-=S; . .... ca A. T-A: ARZ CR--A.=D, ALLCWTO. CR AGPE-0 TO I :,- -- 61.7 NOT To Us. UN"-ZSS 7 Apps a IV -KA: A:;z K:lc�.: .0 YOU Ar THE PC- y CA— A. . H- nE�lc aSCCp=S A- p-L::'e CA7T; THA: nr37, OR 7 ::: NO LOSS T PC, TA:5 CC-S NT THE Co-d KA-C;Z CESC'R:3D 1-4 C7VEPED RISK HA- -:RS- cc= :7 AV-Za — -icy CA.- n. 2:, 21. 24 Op. :S. 5 -z FAY VALUE F:R Y:L - R T:: - -e. ' 6 LACK or A R:G-7: .7mlaw:; -.0 IN MI.AGIA;m 3 CT sch TC;Lr-z A; A. -0 A:'! L�;= or�-Sloz THE ;L?SIA S?-:.FZ:XLL'f C-rZ7:2S: A:�- A• a 1v ST3EET3. ALLEYS, OR WATERWAYS THA7 T-L:C'.t :HS LAIC. Ex=:.**SlC%' COSS VC CCVZ7AGV ZESZR:37C :N RISK " CR 13- STEW>-RT TITLE GUARA-NTY COZ'EP;L'Ty F-1-7 1959 ?A:-- S OF 6 LO;l_-4 POLICY OF TITLE INSURA-NCE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE C:': °+.7E '-' : i T Z -f T PA! y_x_S;S A..A- FR�:l C:.--A:5Z Or 7.. POL::'- ANC H CCm?A�. W:L- NC, ��R FriS Op. 7X?V:!3-3 ;LR:3Z Bf CF: A. _s 7-, R'_':L=::Z A:.:.. 20`:::;J 7z cccuPANZY. :NZ R_ . :NZ = : i:jj T, C.,L*.A— C. _x7N_ N-W OR :cf ;;477 !7:X--R 14, 1.5, m A Nz. KAS cc ;_::R TZ C.% C_ A C�:XS OR C _R Y="S; -c 3.! :. _ z 7D R-==:3 A7 :A.- :F :Vi. 3 7C x T CLA.y 7.1:3 :N N_ LS, 9. 2:. 2, 24. 25. -i. L. 2?. 30. 32. 33. 34, T'Z C_�:Y�;7 :�z ;A,:- VALUT IV Loss CF. W.,:C.. :F T..- -F.- CF. TA: I -,-Is C 7"T_ CT 7` 0- TUT _Kc,:Rzn M:?..-. sr=A�Z_ zip. OF .,ZT ;oL_*cy. CZ :::Aa: :t . :_ -:.e C. ov C _y W:. CC:N3 3:!;-- L.::D OF :z L:-:1 C_ xcr.OA5., OR C:-46:m =4R7_3F. Aa:szs ov Oi 7 - - C== - :C.� OR _F.__ -?_ANSA:-.!C'! FCP'CAZ- ;4�1 is =AS 0 V;CN A:r: ;R07-C7 6 CLA:X, wt,:C., HE MCR= BY THIS POL:CY, , -[ Aj�!SFS CUT OF V - TR�NSAC.::.V C?ZA.:N�; T :N.-..- . CT SAO— INSLA BY R=ASCN OF TIES OPE?A-:CN' OF F___-_?AL S-.A-- OR s:x:L.11 cRrD:-.-.RSI R:GH_i LAWS. TF.A_ IS CV: X. Es A.7, :7=X.: A r? Tb7 CCWM;LvcT CA Fw,="LZNT -3- _C.q OF THE ccc-..,:.Nz 3UaCR:jj,,a- 1c, CT 7'"- :%.-A OF T :Nz*�.,_z RE A R_ A;;L:CA:. 07 'UT-ABLE sL7cRz!NA:::,N; OR n=A_m:;3 -TRES- ZTER-N-:AL TRANSFER EXC-;r Br_:N�; O_mv= A 2R_. 7-Tsu-.3 FF RmzN, or TG Aw;,:R:'.�_zm:. F:7, VALUE CR A r CR -:Tal CRECITCp C_ SL7Ca - ..FA ?: ;G:::T . -:;- l_.:l.:Rr: a'! S_AT'=.: - C. N= L.'M:T THE LA-o CA:_ Or T�:s zxc=s=!; 34 STEWA T TITLE GUA—R.A.NTY COM?A-NY r EL CAMINO C a_ NO ... 05,5 .r -. Z' @8 � SHT 2 2 ?13 AC 1• 3 (2) 3 90 At a 08 3767AC SIOLDoICIL OPEN SPICE G6 REAL It C E SS T, 1 26 AC. ;Th117- LhL ;,11—C L, —b11L1,.d :to be co.re-t, the cc"ny aszu_.:. PC I"b'llfY (Or -17 •loss occL-Li,r, h, re.... of 4 0 101AC 1% \ 5 (D SHT 2 MAP 10675 -CO. OF SEC 23-T 13S- P.—^W- PAR I t4 AC I se -c z ?a It .0 ... 05,5 .r -. Z' @8 � SHT 2 2 ?13 AC 1• 3 (2) 3 90 At a 08 3767AC SIOLDoICIL OPEN SPICE G6 REAL It C E SS T, 1 26 AC. ;Th117- LhL ;,11—C L, —b11L1,.d :to be co.re-t, the cc"ny aszu_.:. PC I"b'llfY (Or -17 •loss occL-Li,r, h, re.... of 4 0 101AC 1% \ 5 (D SHT 2 MAP 10675 -CO. OF SEC 23-T 13S- P.—^W- BONDING COST ESTIMATE FOR: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND TENNIS CLUB DRIVE Grauer Foundation for Education PE789G PREPARED BY: PASCO ENGINEERING, INC 535 N. HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 05/25/2001 LildtiLt �� S %Z9% WAYNE d . PASCO, RCE 29577 /DATf GP DRAWING No. -G PRIVATE GRADING AND DRAINAGE BOND ESTIMATE CITY OF ENCINITAS GRADING: EXCAVATION/EMBANKMENT PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS 6" PCC CURB & GUTTER G -2 4" AC PAVING 6" TREATED BASE PCC BROW DITCH PER D-75 6" PVC DRAIN PIPE 12 "x12" AREA DRAIN D-25 CURB OUTLET D-1 CURB INLET EROSION CONTROL HYDROSEED GRAVEL BAGS SILT FENCE PE 789G 05/29/2001 UNIT 0- UNIT PRICE TOTAL 7,900 CY @ $4.10 $32,390.00 @ $2.00 $2.00 SUBTOTAL= $32,390.00 $5.00 10% CONTINGENCIES= $3,239.00 TOTAL= $35,629.00 1650 LF @ $13.75 $22,687.50 39300 SF @ $1.65 $64,845.00 39300 SF @ $0.90 $35,370.00 512 LF @ $13.65 $6,988.80 400 LF @ $37.00 $14,800.00 11 EA @ $50.00 $550.00 1 EA @ $2,240.00 $4,480.00 1 EA @ $3,675.00 $7,350.00 SUBTOTAL= $157,071.30 10% CONTINGENCIES= $15,707.13 TOTAL= $172,778.43 x SF @ $0.11 $0.11 x EA @ $2.00 $2.00 x LF @ $5.00 $5.00 SUBTOTAL= $7.11 10% CONTINGENCIES= $0.71 TOTAL= $7.82 GRAND TOTAL-- $208,415.25 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION -rL, Ca-r Cv� S vii.- o 0 ( ,,�ALZHEIMERS- CARE- FAC -ffifTy EL CAMINO REAL & TENNIS CLUB DR. ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA - Prepared By - Slodden Engineering 6782 STANTON AVE., SUITE E BUENA PARK, CA 90621 (562) 864 -4121 (714) 523 -0952 Slodden Engineering } * Sladden Engineering 6782 Stanton Ave.. Suite E, Buena Park, CA 90621 (562) 864 -4121 (714) 523 -0952 Fax (714) 523.1369 October30, 1998 Amdal Residential Care, Inc. 2070 Business Center Drive Irvine, California 92612 Attention: Mr. Dan Ansel Project: Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Alzheimers Care Facility El Camino Real & Tennis Club Drive Encinitas, California Project No. 444 -8092 Presented herewith is the report of our Geotechnical Investigation conducted at the site of the proposed Alzheimers Care Facility to be located on the southwest comer of El Camino Real and Tennis Club Drive in the City of Encinitas, California. The investigation was performed in order to provide recommendations for site preparation and foundation design for the proposed buildings and associated site improvements. This report presents the results of our field investigation and laboratory testing along with conclusions and recommendations for foundation design and site preparation. This report completes our initial scope of services as described in our proposal dated July 20, 1998. We appreciate the opportunity to provide services to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, SLADD�NGINEERINC C1 apROFESS�� Brett L. A ersotl W ��4 s Principal Enginee rc m No. C 15389 EkA 9 -30 -2002 Copies: 6- Amdal Residential Care, Inc. R. Layne ichins i 4 No. 1793 Sr. Engineering Geolog CEnrmo 4 ist ,`,�.,- c�c + > =- ,�N�',• INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation performed in order to provide recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed Alzheimers Care Facility and associated site improvements. The proposed project site is located on the southwest comer of El Camino Real and Tennis Club Drive in the City of Encinitas, California. The project will include an Alzheimers Care Facility comprised of two buildings with associated site improvements including paved parking areas, driveways and landscape areas. A site plan provided by Amdal Residential Care, Inc. was used as a reference during our investigation. SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our investigation was to determine certain engineering characteristics of the near surface soils on the site in order to develop recommendations for foundation design and site preparation. Our investigation included field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis, a review of published literature pertaining to the site geology /seismicity and the preparation of this report. Evaluation of hazardous materials or other environmental issues was not within the scope of services provided. Our investigation was performed in accordance with contemporary soil engineering principles and practice. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located on the southwest comer of El Camino Real and Tennis Club Drive in the City of Encinitas, California. The project will include two multi -unit residential care buildings. The site plan provided by Amdal Residential Care, Inc. indicates that the facility will include two buildings along with various related site improvements. The site improvements will include paved driveways and parking areas, landscape areas and various underground utilities. The site has an overall slope to the east and southeast with a maximum elevation differential of approximately 30 feet. The site is presently vacant and teh ground surface is covered with dense brush, trees, weeds and long grass. The dense brush made drill rig access difficult and limited our boring loevation options on the site. The property appears to be in a basically native condition with some minor previous grading possible along the existing roadways. The adjacent streets are paved and underground utilities exist within and along the streets. It is our understanding that the proposed buildings will be of relatively lightweight single -story wood -frame construction and will be supported by conventional shallow spread footings. Based upon expected foundation loading for similar structures, we assume that column loads will be less than- 30.- kips_and.wall loads will be less than 2.5 kips per lineal foot. Grading is expected to include substantial cuts and minor fills to attain relatively level building pad areas. This does not include removal and recompaction of the bearing soils within the building areas as recommended in the Grading section of this report. October 30,1998 1 Project No. 444 -8092 Slodden Englnoofing SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The site is underlain by alluvial soils consisting primarily of slightly silty to silty fine to medium grained sands. The alluvial deposits appeared fairly firm throughout the depth of our borings. Testing indicated dry density varying from 98 pcf and 118 pcf. In general, density appears to increase with depth except below the existing groundwater surface. The soils were found to be moist throughout the depth of our borings but wet below a depth of 20 to 25 feet. Testing indicated moisture content varying from 3.0 to 23.4 percent. Laboratory classification testing indicates that the surface soils and previously placed fill soils consist primarily of silty fine to medium grained sands. Expansion testing indicates that the surface soils fall within the "very low" expansion category in accordance with the Uniform Building Code classification system. Consolidation testing suggests that the alluvial soils remain somewhat compressible under heavy loading. Scattered cemented zones and generally dense conditions resulted in difficult drilling within several of the boring locations. The site soils appeared less cemented and drilling was noticeably easier below the existing groundwater level. Groundwater was encountered within boring one at a depth of approximately 36 to 37 feet below the existing ground surface. Groundwater should not be a factor in foundation design or construction. GEOLOGY / SEISMICITY The project site is located within a seismically active area of Southern California. Two computer programs were utilized to compile data relative to earthquake fault zones in the region and previous seismic activity that may have affected the site. E.Q. Fault Version 2.1 (Blake 1989) provides a compilation of data related to earthquake faults in the region. The program searches available data bases and summarizes both distances to causitive faults and the corresponding accelerations that may be experienced on the site due to earthquake activity along these faults. The attenuation relationship utilized for this project was based upon Joyner & Boore (1982) attenuation curves. E.Q. Search Version 2.1 (Blake 1989) provides a compilation of previous earthquake activity that may have occured in the area of the site. In addition, the accelerations that may have been experienced in the area of the site as a result of previous earthquake activity are estimated. The output data from these two computer programs is attached. As indicated on the summary page of the E.Q. Fault output data, the Rose Canyon Fault is the closest active fault to the site (approximately 4.7 miles). The maximum credible site acceleration is estimated to be 0.477g while the maximum probable site acceleration is estimated to be 0.2908. As indicated on the summary page of the E.Q. Search output data, the nearest documented historic earthquake was approximately three miles from the site. The maximum site acceleration that has been previously experienced on the site is estimated to be 0.436g. There are no known active faults or fault features on or near the site. The site is not located within a currently established fault hazard special study zone. October 30,1998 2 Project No. 444 -8092 Slodden Englneortng CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon our field investigation and laboratory testing, it is our opinion that the proposed development is feasible from a soil mechanic's standpoint provided that the recommendations included in this report are considered in building foundation design and site preparation. Due to the somewhat inconsistent conditions of the near surface native alluvial soils, remedial grading is recotnunended. We recommend that remedial grading within the proposed building areas include the overexcavation and and recompactiott of the near surface soils. Specific recommendations for site preparation are presented in the Site Grading section of this report Groundwater was encountered within our borings at a depth of 36 to 37 feet below the existing. ground surface. Due to the presence of groundwater, liquefaction analyses were performed. The alluvial soils encountered below the existing groundwater surface appear susceptible to liquefaction based upon grain -size characteristics. In addition, the blowcounts indicate that the silty sands are somewhat loose. Based upon the grain -size characteristics and the loose conditions of the deeper alluvial soils, the potential for liquefaction and the related surficial affects of liquefaction impacting the site exists. Due to the depth to groundwater, it is likely that if liquefaction were to occur, the surface impact would be limited to fairly uniform areal subsidence. The potential settlements associated with liquefaction of the deeper silty sands were estimated to be less than two inches. The compacted soil mats to be developed for building foundation support should help mitigate potential differential settlements associated with liquefaction. It is our opinion that liquefaction related mitigation measures in addition to the recommended remedial grading should not be necessary. Design professionals should be aware of the site's geologic setting and seismicity. The potential site accelerations should be considered in structural design. Caving did occur within our borings indicating that the materials encountered may be susceptible to caving within deeper excavations. All excavations should be constructed in accordance with the normal CalOSHA excavation criteria. On the basis of our observations of the materials encountered, we anticipate that the subsoils will conform to those described by CalOSHA as Type C. Soil conditions should be verified in the field by a "Competent person" employed by the Contractor. The surface soils encountered during our investigation were found to have minimal expansion potential. Laboratory testing indicated an Expansion Index of 0 which corresponds with the "very low" category in accordance with UBC Classification System. If imported soils are to be used during grading, they should have an Expansion Index of less than 20. The following recommendations present more detailed design criteria which have been developed on the basis of our field and laboratory investigation. Foundation Design: The results of our investigation indicate that either conventional shallow continuous footings or isolated pad footings, which are supported upon properly recompacted soils, may be expected to provide satisfactory support for the proposed structure. Overexcavation and recompaction should be performed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report to provide for uniform and first bearing conditions. October 30,1998 Project No. 444 -8092 Slodden &Qlneertng Footings should extend at least 18 inches beneath lowest adjacent grade. Isolated square or rectangular footings at least two feet square may be designed using an allowable bearing value of 2500 pounds per square foot. Continuous footings at least 12 inches wide should be designed using an allowable bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot. The allowable bearing pressures are for dead and frequently applied live loads and may be increased by 1/3 to resist wind, seismic or other transient loading. Care should be taken to see that bearing or subgrade soils are not allowed to become saturated from the ponding of rainwater or irrigation. Drainage from the building area should be rapid and complete. The recommendations made in the preceding paragraph are based on the assumption that all footings will be supported upon properly compacted native soils. All grading shall be performed under the testing and inspection of the Soils Engineer or his representative. Prior to the placement of concrete, we recommend that the footing excavations be inspected. in order to verify that they extend into compacted soil and are free of loose and disturbed materials. Settlements: Settlements may result from the anticipated foundation loads. These estimated ultimate settlements are calculated to be a maximum of one inch when using the recommended bearing values. As a practical matter, differential settlements between footings can be assumed as one -half of the total settlement. In general, the maximum differential settlements should be expected to occur across a minimum distance of approximately 50 feet. Lateral Design: Resistance to lateral loads may be provided by a combination of friction acting at the base of the slabs or foundations and passive earth pressure along the sides of the foundations. A coefficient of friction of 0.45 between soil and concrete may be used with dead load forces only. A passive earth pressure of 300 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth, may be used for the sides of footings which are poured against properly compacted native soils. Passive earth pressure should be ignored within the upper one foot except where confined (such as beneath a floor slab). Retaining Walls: Retaining walls may be necessary to accomplish the proposed construction. Lateral pressures for use in retaining wall design can be estimated using an equivalent fluid weight of 35 pef for level free - draining backfill conditions. For walls that are to be restrained at the top, the equivalent fluid weight should be increased to 55 pcf for level free - draining backfill conditions. Backdrains should be provided for the full height of the walls. Expansive Soils: Due to the presence of "very low" expansion category soils near the surface, special expansive soil design criteria may not be necessary for the design of foundations and concrete slabs -on- grade. Slab reinforcement should be established by the Structural Eugineer. Concrete Slabs -on- Grade: All surfaces to receive concrete slabs -on -grade should be underlain by a minimum compacted fill thickness of 12 inches, placed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report. Where slabs are to receive moisture sensitive floor coverings or where dampness of the floor slab is not desired, we recommend the use of an appropriate vapor barrier or an adequate capillary break. Vapor barriers should be protected by sand in order to reduce the possibility of puncture and to aid in obtaining uniform concrete curing. A layer of gravel of uniform size at least four inches thick should be effective as a capillary break and may be used in lieu of the vapor barrier. October 30,1998 4 Project No. 444 -8092 Slodden EngIneertng Reinforcement of slabs -on -grade in order to resist expansive soil pressures may not be required however, reinforcement will have a beneficial effect in containing cracking due to concrete shrinkage. Temperature and shrinkage related cracking should be anticipated in all concrete slabs -ott- grade. Slab reinforcement and the spacing of control joints should be determined by the Structural Engineer. Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate concentrations of the surface soils were determined to be approximately 90 parts per million (ppnt). This is within the usual allowable limits for the use of Type 11 cement and the use of Type V cement or specialized sulfate resistant mix designs should not be necessary. Tentative Pavement Design: All pavement should be underlain by a minimum compacted fill thickness of 12 inches (excluding aggregate base). This may be perfomned as described in the Site Grading Section of this report. Although R -Value testing was not conducted during our recent investigation, based upon the surface soil conditions encountered an R -Value in excess of 50 is expected. On this basis, we snake the following recommendations for pavement section design. In the majority of the parking areas and driveway areas (Traffic Index < 5.5), a pavement section of 3.0 inches of asphalt on 4.0 inches of base material should be adequate. If areas of heavy truck traffic are anticipated, the pavement section should be increased to 3.5 inches of asphalt on 6.0 inches of base material. Final design for asphalt pavement should be based upon R -Value testing perforned after site grading has been completed. Aggregate base should conform to the requirements for Class 2 Aggregate base in Section 26 of CalTrans Standard Specifications, January, 1992. Asphaltic concrete should conform to Section 39 of the CalTrans Standard Specifications. The recommended sections should be provided with a uniformly compacted subgrade and precise control of thickness and elevations during placement. Drainage from paved areas should be rapid and complete. It should be noted that the pavement sections recommended above are minimum sections, if heavily loaded vehicles are expected to cross automobile parking and driving areas, thicker pavement sections may be desired at these locations. Pavement and slab designs are tentative and should be confirmed at the completion of site grading when the subgrade soils are in- place. This will include sampling and testing of the actual subgrade soils and an analysis based upon the specific use. Shrinkage and Subsidence: Volumetric shrinkage of the material which is excavated and replaced as controlled compacted fill should be anticipated. We estimate that this shrinkage should be between 10 and 15 percent. Subsidence of the surfaces which are scarified and compacted should be less than 0.1 tenth of a foot. This will vary depending upon the type of equipment used, the moisture content of the soil at the time of grading and the actual degree of compaction attained. These values for shrinkage and subsidence are exclusive of losses which will occur due to site clearing and the stripping of the organic material from the site. The losses associated with root system removal cannot be accurately estimated until site clearing commences. General Site Grading: All grading should be performed in accordance with applicable portions of the grading ordinance of The City of Encinitas, California. The following recommendations have been developed on the basis of our field and laboratory testiug: October 30,1998 5 Project No. 444 -8092 Slodden Englneertnq I . Clearing and Grubbing: All surfaces to receive compacted fill should be cleared of existing vegetation, fill, debris, and other unsuitable materials which should be removed from the site. Soils which are loosened during site clearing should be removed and replaced as controlled compacted fill under the direction of the Soils Engineer. 2. Preparation of Building and Foundation Areas: Within the building areas (and five feet beyond laterally), the surface soils should be overexcavated to a minimum depth of three feet below existing grade our three feet below the bottom of the footings, whichever is deeper. The exposed surface should be scarified, brought to near optimum moisture content and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. With proper root removal, the previously removed soils may be used as engineered fill as recommended in section 3 below. Other areas to receive compacted fill should be scarified, brought to near optimum moisture content, and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction prior to fill placement. 3. Placement of Compacted Fill: Fill materials consisting of on -site soils or approved imported granular soils, should be spread in shallow lifts, and compacted at near optimum moisture content to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. Imported material shall have an Expansion Index not exceeding 20. The contractor shall notify the Soils Engineer at least 48 hours in advance of importing soils in order to provide sufficient time for the evaluation of proposed import materials. The contractor shall be responsible for delivering material to the site which complies with the project speciftcayons. Approval by the Soils Engineer will be based upon material delivered to the si�e and not the preliminary evaluation of import sources. i Our observations of the material encountered during our investigation indicate that compaction will be most readily obtained by means of heavy rubber - wheeled equipment or sheepsfoot compactors. At the time of our investigation, the subsoils were found to be quite dry. A more uniform moisture content should be attained during recompaction and fill placement. 4. Preparation of Exterior Slab and Pavement Areas: All surfaces to receive asphalt concrete paving or concrete slabs -on- grade, should be underlain by a minimum compacted fill thickness of 12 inches. This may be accomplished by a combination of overexcavation, scarification and recompaction of the surface, and replacemeat of the excavated material as controlled compacted fill. Compaction of the slab areas shall be to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. Compaction within the proposed roadway areas shall be to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction. 5. Testing and Inspection: During grading tests and observations shall be performed by the Soils Engineer or his representative in order to verify that the grading is being performed in accordance with the project specifications. Field density testing shall be performed in accordance with applicable ASTM test standards. The minimum acceptable degree of compaction shall be 90 percent of the maximum dry density as obtained by the ASTM D1557 -91 test method. Where testing indicates insufficient density, additional compactive effort shall be applied until retesting indicates satisfactory compaction. October 30,1998 Project No. 444 -8092 Slodden Engtneertng GENERAL The findings and recommendations presented in this report are based upon an interpolatiou of the soil conditions between boring locations and extrapolation of these conditions throughout the proposed building areas. Should conditions encountered during grading appear different than those indicated in this report, this office should be notified. This report is considered to be applicable for use by Amdal Residential Care, Inc. for the specific site and project described herein. The use of this report by other parties or for other projects is not authorized. The recommendations of this report are contingent upon monitoring of the grading . operations by a representative of Sladden Engineering. All recommendations are considered to be tentative pending our review of the grading operations and additional testing, if indicated. If others are employed to perform any soil testing, this office should be notified prior to such testing in order to coordinate any required site visits by our representative and to assure indemnification of Sladden Engineering. We recommend that a pre -job conference be held on the site prior to the initiation of site grading. The purpose of this meeting will be to assure a complete understanding of the recommendations presented in this report as they apply to the actual grading performed. October 30,1998 7 Project No. 444 -8092 Slodden Engineering APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION For our field investigation, four exploratory borings were excavated by means of a truck mounted hollow stem auger rig (CME 75) at the approximate locations indicated on the site plan included in this appendix. Continuous logs of the materials encountered were made on the site by a representative of Sladden Engineering. The borings were performed on September 17, 1998. Boring logs are included in this appendix. Representative undisturbed samples were obtained within our borings by driving a thin - walled steel penetration sampler (California split spoon sampler) with a 140 pound hammer dropping approximately 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler 18 inches were recorded in six inch increments and are indicated on the boring logs. The sampler type was 3.0 inches in diameter, carrying brass sample rings having inner diameters of 2.5 inches. Undisturbed samples were removed from the sampler and placed in moisture sealed containers in order to preserve the natural soil moisture content. Samples were then transported to our laboratory for further observations and testing. October 30,1998 8 Project No. 444 -8092 Slodden Engineering 1 APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Representative bulk and relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained in the field and returned to our laboratory for additional observations and testing. Laboratory testing was generally performed in two phases. The first phase consisted of testing in order to determine the compaction of the existing natural soil and the general engineering classifications of the soils underlying the site. This testing was performed in order to estimate the engineering characteristics of the soil and to serve as a basis for selecting samples for the second phase of testing. The second phase consisted of soil mechanics testing. This testing including consolidation, shear strength and expansion testing was performed in order to provide a means of developing specific design. recommendations based on the mechanical properties of the soil. CLASSIFICATION AND COMPACTION TESTING Unit Weight and Moisture Content Determinations: Each undisturbed sample was weighed and measured in order to determine its unit weight. A small portion of each sample was then subjected to testing in order to determine its moisture content. This was used in order to determine the dry density of the soil in its natural condition. The results of this testing are shown on the Boring Logs. Maximum Density - Optimum Moisture Determinations: Representative soil types were selected for maximum density determinations. This testing was performed in accordance with the ASTM Standard D1557 -91 tes'l method A. The results of this testing are presented graphically in this appendix. The maximum densities are compared to the field densities of the soil in order to determine the existing relative compaction to the soil. This is shown on the Boring Logs, and is useful in estimating the strength and compressibility of the soil. Classification Testing: Representative soil samples were selected for classification testing. This testing consists of mechanical grain size analyses and Atterberg Limits determinations. These provide information for developing classifications for the soil in accordance with the Unified Classification System. This classification system categorizes the soil into groups having similar engineering characteristics. The results of this testing are very useful in detecting variations in the soils and in selecting samples for further testing. SOIL MECHANIC'S TESTING Direct Shear Testing: One sample was selected for Direct Shear Testing. This testing measures the shear strength of the soil under various normal pressures and is used in developing parameters for foundation design and lateral design. Testing was performed using recompacted test specimens which were saturated prior to testing. Testing was performed using a strain controlled test apparatus with normal pressures ranging from 800 to 2300 pounds per square foot. Expansion Testing: One sample was selected for Expansion testing. Expansion testing was performed in accordance with the UBC Standard 18-2. This testing consists of remolding 4 inch diameter by 1 -inch truck test specimens to a moisture content and dry density corresponding to approximately 50 percent saturation. The samples are subjected to a surcharge of 144 pounds per square foot and allowed to reach equilibrium. At that point the specimens are inundated with distilled water. The linear expansion is then measured until complete. October 30,1998 9 Project No. 444 -8092 Slodden "[nesting Consolidation Testing: Consolidation testing was performed on four samples in order to evaluate the compressibility and hydroconsolidation potential of the site soils. Testing was performed in general conformance with ASTM D 2435. Samples were subjected to loads varying from 720 psf to 11570 psf.and were saturated during the 720 psf load increment. Graphic presentations of the test results are attached. October 30,1998 10 Project No. 444 -8092 Slodden Engineering APPENDIX A Feld Exploration Site Plan Boring Logs Slodden Englneering TENNIS CLUB DRIVE INTERSTATE 5 -Kr 4 W MANCFESTER H .rf `+ w �1 �� a• �� fig. �� w t.�x cns�nGV»YC+D �wD tU15LlL U�7L1TY ft' 74_04603A IV rA a4 jV AW � e-JL1YCWA+MP' UN i'flt bIS'flr(lr K f -:ifrr 0 Approximate Boring Locations VAIJ 1 ;' E 4) X� i �I I Boring Location Map J Alzheimers Care Facility El Camino Real & Tennis Club Drive Encinitas, California Sladden Engineering DATE: 11 -23 -98 IJOB NO.: 444 -8092 Encinitas - Tennis Club Drive & El Camino Real Date: 9 -17 -98 Boring No. l Job No.: 444 -8092 s o 44i c E w o DESCRIPTION 7 3 q p G � n a 9 U REMARKS 0 20/25/30 Silty Sand: Orange brown, slightly clayey, fine grained SM 105 3.6 - -- Cemented s • _ 10 10/15/25 15/18/20 10113/15 15/25/30 Silty Sand: Orange brown, clayey, very silty, fine grained „ SM " " 107 115 111 119 8.7 5.2 5.2 8.7 _ -- _ -. -•- -- Cemented Cemented Cemented Very cemented (hard to cut rings) is . I 20 10/12/16 8/11/13 5/8/12 Silty Sand: Orange brown, slightly clayey, Cute grained ^ SM 104 110 103 7.0 6.4 9.3 ••• - -- •• Slightly cemented (tight drilling from 15 to 25') 25 5/515 Silty Sand: Orange brown, clayey, very silty, fine grained Sbt ... 17.7 Silty clay layers up to 2" thick 30 • 515/5 Silty Sand: Orange brown, slightly clayey, fine grained SM ... 9,9 35 _ 7/716 Silty Sand: Orange brown, clayey, very silty. fine grained SM • -- 16.3 •- Groundwater ®36 feet Silty clay layers up to 3" thick 40 - 7/615 Sand: Orange brown, slightly silty, fine grained SP /SM ... 22.0 -- q5 - - 315/6 Silty Sand: Orange brown, clayey, very silty, fine grained ShI 2Y 7 ... Silt clay layers u to 3" thick y y P " 50 719112 Silty Sand: Orange brown, slightly clayey, fine grained ShI 1L 23.q • - a5 - Recovered Semple Standard Penetration Sample Note: The statification lines represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. Total Depth = 51.5' No Bedrock No Groundwater Encinitas - Tennis Club Drive & El Camino Real Date: 9.17 -98 Boring No. 2 Job No.: 444.8092 DESCRIPTION T REbZARKS o c o o rn U cC a o U 0 " Sand: Orange brown, SP /Sbf Short aspalt driveway (old) i i slightly silty, fine grained Fill upper 4' 5 f 61616 106 5.8 84 13/15/50 Silty Sand: Orange brown, Sbf 117 3.0 ... Cemented slightly clayey, fine grained t0 819113 08 4.7 . Silty Sand: Orange brown, SM IS clayey, very silty, 10 /10110 fine grained ... 11.1 - -- Silt layer 2" thick 20 rSandrange O brown, SP /SA1 516/7 ghtly silty, fine grained 7.0 Silt layer 2" thick Total Depth = 21.5' - - Recovered Sample No Bedrock 25 Standard Penetration No Groundwater Sample 30 35 40 45 50 - Note: The statification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types. the transitions may be gradual. Encinitas - Tennis Club Drive & El Camino Real Date: 9 -17 -98 Boring No. 3 Job No.: 444.8092 3 yr ,.o 0 5 I Silty Sand: Orange brown, SM slightly clayey, fine grained 12 108 5.2 - -• 8 Sand: Orange brown, SP 111 3.6 ... fine grained 10 I . ■ la /eia „ „ 1 . 11 ... I 7.0 I - -- I I Silt layer 1" thick 15 20 Sand: Orange brown, SP /SM 3,6 slightly silty, fine grained r Silty Sand: Orange brown, DESCRIPTION H A d a REARKS IvL W clayey, very silty, ... 11.1 -• .14 0. F. O — 0 0 5 I Silty Sand: Orange brown, SM slightly clayey, fine grained 12 108 5.2 - -• 8 Sand: Orange brown, SP 111 3.6 ... fine grained 10 I . ■ la /eia „ „ 1 . 11 ... I 7.0 I - -- I I Silt layer 1" thick 15 20 Sand: Orange brown, SP /SM 3,6 slightly silty, fine grained - Recovered Sample 25 m Standard Penetration Sample 30 1 35 1 40 45 I So Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock No Groundwater . Note: The statification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types: the transitions may be gradual. Silty Sand: Orange brown, SM fl 617/8 clayey, very silty, ... 11.1 -• fine grained — - Recovered Sample 25 m Standard Penetration Sample 30 1 35 1 40 45 I So Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock No Groundwater . Note: The statification lines 55 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types: the transitions may be gradual. Encinitas - Tennis Club Drive & El Camino Real Date: 9 -17 -98 Boring No. 4 Job No.: 444.8092 3 � 0 DESCRIPTION q c ca o REMARKS y it U Gi to rte- 15 e e CJ 0 Silty Sand: Orange brown, SM _ • clayey, very silty, • fine grained 6I5 /5 - -- 13.0 s 4I5l6 Silty Sand: Orange brown, SM ••• 6.4 -•• slightly clayey, fine grained 10 5/617 Silty Sand: Orange brown, SM '" 11.7 . Cemented ' clayey, very silty, • fine grained is 41516 Silty Sand: Orange brown, SM ... 14.3 ••. - slightly clayey, fine grained 20 Sand: Orange brown, SP /SM 4/414 slightly silty, fine grained 7.0 .. ' - m Standard Penetration Total Depth = 21.5' No Bedrock - Sample No Groundwater 25 30 35 40 - i 45 50 Note: The statification lines s5 represent the approximate boundaries between the soil types; the transitions may be gradual. APPENDIX B Laboratory Testing Laboratory Test Results $lodden Engineering Job No.: 444.8092 126 125 124 a w 123 Y a Q Y G 122 O 121 120 119 8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 Moisture Content (Y.) METHOD OF COMPACTION ASTM D- 1557 -91, METHOD A OR C BORING MAXIMUM UNIT WEIGHT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 2@0 -5' 125.0 9.3 MAXIMUM DENSITY - OPTIMUM MOISTURE CURVE 100 ?g V) 00 V) 70 d00 0 � 40 W 30 z3 1,J 10 a 11900 Z fl0 70 d a0 Z Ac w� �2C W 10 a 0 GRAIN SIZE,M M ACCUMULATION CURVE 444 -8092 DATE 10/30/98 F I NF COARSE • • US STANDARD • • • • SIEVES (014 • • • • • • • • • ■■■■■M110001 ■II ■I- PAN ■ ■■ ■� ml ■11 NOW ■ ■� ■� ■11 ■ ■1 ■ ■l ■I ■ ■ ■It 01 ■■ ■ ■■ ■iii ■ ■C'ii�i ■i ■■ ■iii ■■�i ■ ■i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■IIS ■ii % ■11■�1 ■'i% ■ ■1■ ■■11...1.1 ■ ■ ■I ■1 ■11.11 ■1 ■ ■ ■1 ■ ■ ■■1 • • • • • . •.. • • •. . . . PARTICLE SIZE, 9 t—US • _ • • -• • SIEVES- 0 • • • • 11 • • • • • • • • ■■■■■M110001 ■II ■I- PAN ■ ■■ ■� ml ■11 NOW ■ ■� ■� ■11 ■ ■1 ■ ■l ■I ■ ■ ■It 01 ■�iv ■■�i ■iii: Giiiii ■i ■ ■ii ■i ■'i% ■ ■■■■ ■ ■ ■I ■1 ■11.11 ■1 ■ ■ ■1 ■ ■ ■■1 • • • • • . •.. • • •. . . . PARTICLE SIZE, MM Slodden Engineering 100 Z floc V) eo -nom a co 'So 40 .0 �20 W 10 a GRAIN SIZE,M M ACCUMULATION CURVE 444 -8092 p TE •10/30/98 v i nl< r- n,!,, RSF • • STAND^RD • : • • • ON • • • • • • • • z r ■ _ ■ ■ ■ PARTICLE SIZE, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■.1■II ■t /r�11 _ ■ ■ ■I ■1 ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■N ■II /I■■ ■1! ■ ■ ■ ■1 ■ 111110 1 MINE ON ■ ■ ■ ■ ■.i ■�—��,�II ■. ■� ■ ■Il ■ ■ ■■1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■11 ■■ I,1 ■.■'o1 ■11 ■1 ■ ■ ■11 ■ ■ ■I ■1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■.IC' tl ■II ■.■,■1 ■ ■ ■ ■11 ■ ■ ■I■1 ■_■■■ ■InvAs1 ■II ■1■■ ■1 ■. mini ■■ ■ ■. ■�� ■ ■ ■ ■�I ■ ■ ■11■�1 ■1 ■� ■1 ■ ■ ■11■■ ■I ■ill ■■■■ ■ ■ 1 II ��il ■1■ ■1 ■� ■I ■1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■. •• Im z 90 w eb V� a a0 F� Z .4D W 30 u 20 w 10 a 0 I U8 8 S o _ ^N _ PARTICLE SIZE, MM •• Im z 90 w eb V� a a0 F� Z .4D W 30 u 20 w 10 a 0 I PARTICLE SIZE, MM Slodden (NIneerinq ONE 111110 1 MINE ON Moll 1111111118111111 ■. ■ ■■■■!■ ■; egaII■ ■1 ■ ■11 ■.■'o1 ■■■ ■■■■■■ C■1■GI■II■1■■■1 ■.■,■1 ■_■m■_ ■_■■■ ■InvAs1 ■II ■1■■ ■1 ■. mini ■■ ■�� ■��11 ■II ■1 ■� ■1 ■� ■I ■1 ■■■■ ■ ■ 1 II ��il ■1■ ■1 ■� ■I ■1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■. 0. 51 ON Fee I a PARTICLE SIZE, MM Slodden (NIneerinq 0 100 Z 90 Z 00 70 d 60 90 � 40 z w 20 w 10 a 0 Z =� N 8C 7C a ac F x Z w 3c U x a Li 10 d 0 GRAIN SIZE,M M AGGUMUL-AT ION CURVE 444 -8092 DAT 10/30/98 F I NC ind RSE E • • GRAVEL STANDARD ON • • • • • • • • • ■■ ■ ■ ■m ■■I■■i ■■1 ■11 ■POM11■■■ ■1 ■■■■■ Sol ■ ■�■�■1■I�II� ■w■ol�om ■, ■1 �1, ■�i ■ ■I�■mi■ii■i■■■li�■ loll � ■�e�TeiA �!in = ■ ■I ■ ■ ■■ ■fI ■ ■II ■, ■■li ME ■■■■ ■■ ■■ ��%�■II■�■■■ ■■■I■1 ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■��1 ■�II ■1 ■II ■1 ■..� ■�.� ■� o U966 � • Wm! PARTICLE SIZE, MM • G ' STANDARD • • • • • • • • ■■ ■ ■ ■m ■■I■■i ■■1 ■11 ■POM11■■■ ■1 ■■■■■ Sol ■ ■�■�■1■I�II� ■w■ol�om ■, ■1 �1, ■�i ■ ■I�■mi■ii■i■■■li�■ loll � ■�e�TeiA �!in = ■ ■I ■ ■ ■■ ■fI ■ ■II ■, ■■li ME ■■■■ ■■ ■■ ��%�■II■�■■■ ■■■I■1 ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■��1 ■�II ■1 ■II ■1 ■..� ■�.� ■� PARTICLE SIZE, MM Slodden Englneering BORING ri0. 1 DATE: 10/30/98 DEPTH 4 rt. 444 -8092 CO N LIDATION- PRESSURE CURVE J J W o0 0 da er All del 1 s _0 J 0 8 � Z 9 0 � U 10 LL I 02 04 0.6 0.8 1.0 20 .4.0 6.0 8010.0 200 NORMAL LOAD KIPS PER 50. FT Slodden Engineering soRj"G n10. 1 DATE:10/30/98 DEPTH 8 Ft. 444 -8092 C N LIDATION- J PRESSURE CURVE J W �0 0 0 a jlterl d d 2 3 I Z O f- 6 7 J O 8 WboL rid Z 9 U � � 02 04 0.6 08 1.0 2.0 QO &0 80 10.0 20.0 NORMAL LOAD KIPS PER SQ, FT Sladdon Engineering ANAHEIM TEST LABORATORY 3008 S. ORANGE AVENUE SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92707 PHONE (714) 549 -7267 TO: SLADDEN ENGINEERING: 6782 STANTON AVE. SUITE E DATE: 9 -21 -98 BUENA PARK, CA. 90621 P.O. No. VERBAL %ppet No. ATTN: BRETT ANDERSON PROJECT: N 444 -8092 ENCINITAS: Hole -2 @ 0 -5' FORM IZ ANALYTICAL REPORT SOLUBLE SULFATES per CA. 417 90 ppm Lob. No. B 3726 SpecBkatlon: Materbt: SOIL APPENDIX C OutputData E.Q. FAULT Version 2.1 E.Q. SEARCH Version 2.1 Slodden CNIneoAng DATE: Saturday, August 1, 1998 ........ ............................... £¢ S E A R C H Ver. 2.01 ........ ............................... (Estimation of Peak Horizontal Acceleration From California Earthquake Catalogs) SEARCH PERFORMED FOR: Sladden Engineering JOB NUMBER.: 994 -8092 JOB NAME: Encintas SITE COORDINATES: LATITUDE: 33.0286 17 LONGITUDE: 117.255 W TYPE OF SEARCH: RADIUS SEARCH RADIUS: 100 mi SEARCH MAGNITUDES: 5.0 TO 9.0 SEARCH DATES: 1600 TO 1998 ATTENUATION RELATION: 12) Boore et al. (1993) Horiz. - Larger - Site Class C UNCERTAINTY (M =Mean, S= Mean +1 - Sigma): M SCOND: 0 FAULT TYPE ASSUMED (DS= Reverse, SS= Strike - Slip) : DS COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION EARTHQUAY,E -DATA FILE USED: ALLQUAKE.DAT TIME PERIOD OF EXPOSURE FOR STATISTICAL COMPARISON: 25 years SOURCE OF DEPTH VALUES (A= Attenuation File, E= Earthquake Catalog): A Page 1 I I I TIME I FILET LAT. I LONG. I DATE I (GMT) I CODEIVORTH I [TEST I I H M Secl ---- I ------ I------- I-------"'-- I -------- I DMG 133.0001117.3001 1112211600 12130 0.01 MGI 132.8001117.1001 5/25/1803 1 0 0 0.01 Df fG 134.3701117.6501 121 8/1812 115 0 0.01 T -A 134.0001118.2501 9/23/1627 1 0 0 0.01 MGI 134.1001118.1001 7/11/1855 1 415 0.01 T -A 134.0001118.2501 1/10/1856 1 0 0 0.01 MGI 133.0001117.0001 9/21/1856 1 730 0.01 T -A 132.6701117.1701 12/ 0/1856 1 0 0 0.01 MGI 134.0001117.5001 12/1611858 110 0 0.01 T -A 134.0001118.2501 3/26/1860 1 0 0 0.01 DMG 132.7001117.2001 5/27/1862 120 0 0.01 T -A 132.6701117.1701 1012111862 1 0 0 0.01 T -A 132.6701117.1701 5/24/1865 1 0 0 0.01 T -A 133.5001115.8201 5/ 0/1868 1 0 0 0.01 T -A 132.2501117.5001 1/13/1877 120 0 0.01 DMG 133.9001117.2001 12/19/1880 1 0 0 0.01 DMG 134.1001116.7001 21 7/1889 1 520 0.01 DMG 134.2001117.9001 8/28/1889 1 215 0.01 DPIG 133.4001116.3001 2/ 9/1890 112 6 0.01 DMG 132.7001116.3001 2/24/1892 1 720 0.01 DMG 133.2001116.2001 5/28/1892 11115 0.01 DMG 134.3001117.6001 7/30/1894 1 512 0.01 DMG 132.8001116.8001 10/23/1894 123 3 0.01 DMG 134.2001117.4001 7/22/1899 1 046 0.01 DMG 134.3001117.5001 7/22/1899 12032 0.01 DMG 133.8001117.0001 12/25/1899 11225 0.01 MGI 134.0001118.0001 12/25/1903 11745 0.01 MGI 134.1001117.3001 7/15/1905 12041 0.01 MGI 134.0001118.3001 9/ 3/1905 1 540 0.01 DMG 134.2001117.1001 9/20/1907 1 154 0.01 DMG 133.7001117.4001 4/11/1910 1 757 0.01 DMG 133.7001117.4001 5/13/1910 1 620 0.01 DMG 133.7001117.4001 5/15/1910 11547 0.01 DMG 133.5001116.5001 9/30/1916 1 211 0.01 DMG 133.7501117.0001 4/21/1918 1223225.01 MGI 133.8001117.6001 4/22/1918 12115 0.01 DMG 133.7501117.0001 6/ 611918 12232 0.01 MGI 134.0001118.5001 11/19/1918 12018 0.01 DMG 133.2001116.7001 l/ 1/1920 1 235 0.01 MGI 134.0801118.2601 7/16/1920 118 8 0.01 MGI 133.2001116.6001 10/12/1920 11748 0.01 DMG 134.0001117.2501 7/23/1923 1 73026.01 DMG 134.0001116.0001 4/ 3/1926 120 8 0.01 DMG 134.0001116.5001 8/ 4/1927 11224 0.01 D14G 134.0001116.0001 9/ 5/1928 11442 0.01 DMG 132.9001115.7001 10/ 2/1928 119 1 0.01 DMG 134.1801116.9201 1/16/1930 1 02433.91 DMG 134.1801116.9201 1/16/1930 1 034 3.61 DMG 133.6171117.9671 3/11/1933 1 154 7.81 DMG 133.7501118.0831 3/11/1933 1 2 9 0.01 DMG 133.7501118.0831 3/11/1933 1 230 0.01 DMG 133.7501118.0831 3!11/1933 1 323 0.01 DMG 133.7001118.0671 3/11/1933 1 51022.01 DMG 133.5751117.5831 3/11/1933 1 518 4.01 DMG 133.6831118.0501 3/11/1933 1 656 3.01 DMG 133.7001118.0671 3/11/1933 1 85457.01 D14•G 133.750[119.0831 3/11/1933 1 910 0.01 D14G 133.8501118.2671 3/11/1933 11425 0.01 I DEPTHIQUAKE (I.in) I MAG. 5.51 6.50 5.51 5.00 5.51 7.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 6.30 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 7.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.90 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 6.30 5.51 5.00 5.51 6.00 5.51 5.30 5.51 5.50 5.51 6.30 5.51 6.70 5.51 6.30 5.51 6.00 5.51 5.70 5.51 5.50 5.51 6.50 5.51 6.40 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.30 5.51 5.30 5.51 6.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 6.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 6.80 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.30 5.51 6.25 5.51 5.50 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.20 5.51 5.10 5.51 6.30 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.20 5.51 5.50 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.00 SITE ISITEI APPROX. ACC. I MM I DISTANCE g I INT. I mi lkmj ------- I ---- I----------- 0.436 1 X 1 3 ( 51 0.072 1 VI 1 18 ( 291 0.054 1 VI 1 95 ( 1531 0.021 1 IV 1 88 [ 142) 0.040 1 V 1 89 [ 1421 0.021 1 IV 1 88 ( 1421 0.083 1 VIII 15 ( 241 0.056 1 VI 1 25 ( 411 0.070 1 VI 1 69 ( 1101 0.021 1 IV 1 88 ( 1421 0.094 1 VIII 23 [ 371 0.056 1 VI 1 25 ( 411 0.056 1 VI 1 25 [ 411 0.040 1 V 1 89 f 143) 0.030 1 V 1 56 [ 901 0.047 1 VI 1 60 ( 971 0.026 1 V 1 81 ( 1301 0.027 1 V 1 89 [ 1431 0.054 1 VI 1 61 [ 981 0.067 1 VI 1 60 ( 961 0.053 1 VI I 62 ( 1001 0.034 1 V 1 90 ( 1451 0.068 1 VI 1 31 ( 491 0.029 1 V 1 81 ( 1311 0.045 1 VI 1 89 [ 1431 0.061 1 VI 1 55 ( 891 0.023 1 IV 1 80 ( 1281 0.028 1 V 1 74 ( 1191 0.024 1 V 1 90 ( 145] 0.037 1 V 1 81 ( 1311 0.035 1 V 1 41 ( 761 0.035 1 V 1 47 ( 761 0.057 1 VI 1 47 ( 761 0.031 1 V 1 54 [ 881 0.078 1 VIII 52 [ 841 0.030 1 V 1 57 [ 911 0.032 1 V 1 52 ( 841 0.020 1 IV 1 98 [ 1581 0.044 1 VI 1 34 ( 551 0.020 1 IV 1 93 ( 1491 0.046 1 VI 1 40 ( 641 0.049 1 VI 1 67 ( 1081 0.025 1 V 1 99 ( 1591 0.020 1 IV 1 98 ( 1581 0.020 1 IV 1 99 [ 1591 0.021 1 IV 1 91 [ 1461 0.025 1 V 1 82 ( 1321 0.024 1 IV 1 82 ( 1321 0.056 1 VI 1 58 ( 93J 0.026 1 11 1 69 [ 1111 0.027 1 V 1 69 [ 1111 0.026 1 V 1 69 ( 1111 0.028 1 V 1 66 ( 1061 0.033 1 V 1 56 ( 911 0.035 1 V 1 64 f 10141 0.028 1 V 1 66 [ 1061 0.027 1 V 1 69 ( 1111 0.023 1 IV 1 81 [ 1311 Fbae 2 I I I I TIME I FILET LAT. I LONG. I DATE I (GMT) I CODEINORTH I WEST I I H M Secl ---- I ------ I ------- I ------------ I -------- 1 DMG 133.7501118.0831 3/13/1933 1131828.01 C14G 133.6171118.0171 3/14/1933 119 150.01 I•NG 133.7331119.1331 10/ 2/1933 1 31017.61 DMG 132.0831116.6671 11/25/1934 1 818 0.01 DMG 131.7591116.5001 4/29/1935 120 8 0.01 DMG 134.1001116.8001 10/24/1935 11446 7.61 DMG 131.8671116.5711 2/27/1937 1 12918.41 DMG 133.4061116.2611 3/25/1937 11649 1.81 DMG 133.6911117.5111 5/31/1938 1 83455.41 C•MG 132.0001117.5001 5/ 1/1939 12353 0.01 DMG 132.0001117.5001 6/24/1939 11627 0.01 DMG 134.0831116.3001 5/18/1940 1 5 358.51 D14G 134.0671116.3331 5/18/1940 1 55120.21 DMG 134.0671116.3331 5/1811940 1 72132.71 DMG 133.0001116.4331 6/ 4/1940 11035 8.31 DMG 133.7831118.2501 11/14/1941 1 84136.31 C-MG 132.9031115.9831 5/23/1942 1154729.01 DMG 132.9671116.0001 10/21/1942 1162213.01 DMG 132.9671116.0001 10/21/1942 1162519.01 DMG 132.9671116.0001 10/21/1942 1162654.01 DMG 133.2331115.7171 10/22/1942 1 15038.01 DMG 132.9671116.0001 10/22/1942 1181326.01 DMG 134.2671116.9671 8/29/1943 1 34513.01 DMG 133.9761116.7211 6/12/1944 1104534.71 DMG 133.9941116.7121 6/12/1944 1111636.01 DMG 133.2171116.1331 8/15/1945 1175624.01 DMG 133.0001115.8331 1/ 8/1946 1185418.01 DMG 133.9501116.8501 9/28/1946 1 719 9.01 DHG 134.0171116.5001 7/24/1947 1221046.01 DMG 134.0171116.5001 7/25/1947 1 04631.01 DMG 134.0171116.5001 7/25/1947 1 61949.01 DMG 134.0171116.5001 7/26/1947 1 24941.01 DMG 132.5001118.5501 2/24/1948 1 81510.01 DMG 133.9331116.3831 12/ 4/1948 1234317.01 DMG 132.2001116.5501 11/ 4/1949 1204238.01 DMG 132.2001116.5501 11/ 5/1949 1 43524.01 DMG 133.1171115.5671 7/28/1950 1175048.01 DMG 133.1171115.5671 7/29/1050 1143632.01 DMG 132.9831115.7331 1/24/1951 1 717 2.61 DMG 132.8171118.3501 12/26/1951 1 04654.01 DMG 132.9501115.7171 6/14/1953 1 41729.91 DMG 133.2831116.1831 3/19/1954 1 95429.01 DMG 133.2831116.1831 3/19/1954 1 95556.01 DMG 133.2831116.1631 3/19/1954 1102117.01 DMG 133.2831116.1831 3/2311954 1 41450.01 DMG 133.2161115.6081 4/25/1957 1215738.71 C•14G 133.1831115.8501 4/25/1957 1222412.01 DMG 133.2311116.0041 5/26/1957 1155933.61 DMG 133.7101116.9251 9/23/1963 1144152.61 DNG 131.8111117.1311 12/22/1964 1205433.21 DMG 133.1961116.1291 4/ 9/1968 1 22859.11 DMG 133.1131116.0371 4/ 5/1968 1 3 353.51 DMG 133.3431116.3461 4/28/1969 1232042.91 DMG 134.2701117.5401 9/12/1970 1143053.01 DMG 133.0331115.8211 9/30/1971 1224611.31 PAS 132.9271115.5401 10/16/1979 1 54910.21 PAS 132.9281115.5391 10!16/1979 1 61942.71 EA3 133.0141115.5551 I0il6!1979 1 65842.81 I DEPTHI4UAKE (km)l MAG. ----- 1 ----- 5.51 5.30 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.40 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.00 5.51 6.00 5.51 5.50 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.40 5.51 5.20 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.40 5.51 5.00 5.51 6.50 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.50 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.50 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.30 5.51 5.70 5.51 5.40 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.50 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.20 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.30 5.51 6.50 5.51 5.70 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.40 5.51 5.50 5.51 5.60 5.51 5.90 5.51 5.50 5.51 6.20 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.50 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.20 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.00 5.51 5.60 5.51 6.40 5.51 5.20 5.51 5.80 5.51 5.40 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.10 5.51 5.50 SITE ISITEI APPROX. ACC. I Mal I DISTANCE g I INT. I mi [km] ------- I---- 1 ----------- 0.030 1 V I 69 1 111) 0.030 1 V 1 60 [ 961 0.030 1 V 1 73 [ 1171 0.024 1 V I 74 [ 1191 0.019 1 IV I 99 [ 1591 0.024 1 V 1 78 [ 1261 0.021 I IV I 90 [ 1441 0.045 1 VI 1 63 ( 1021 0.043 1 VI 1 49 [ 781 0.025 1 V 1 72 ( 117] 0.025 1 V 1 72 ( 1171 0.025 1 V 1 91 ( 1471 0.023 I IV 1 69 [ 1441 0.021 I IV I 89 [ 1441 0.036 I V 1 48 [ 77) 0.029 1 V 1 77 [ 1251 0.024 1 V 1 74 ( 1191 0.052 1 VI 1 73 ( 1171 0.025 1 V 1 73 [ 117) 0.025 1 V 1 73 [ 1171 0.027 1 V 1 90 ( 1451 0.025 1 V 1 73 [ 1171 0.028 1 V I 87 [ 1401 0.026 1 V I 72 [ 1161 0.028 1 V 1 74 [ 1181 0.038 1 V 1 66 ( 1061 0.027 1 V 1 82 [ 1331 0.026 1 V I 68 [ 1091 0.029 1 V 1 81 [ 1301 0.013 1 IV 1 81 [ 1301 0.025 1 V 1 81 1 130) 0.024 1 IV 1 91 [ 1301 0.026 1 V 1 84 [ 1351 0.048 1 VI I 80 [ 1291 0.036 1 V 1 70 ( 1131 0.027 1 V 1 70 ( 1131 0.024 1 V 1 98 [ 1571 0.025 1 V 1 98 ( 1571 0.029 1 V I 88 [ 142) 0.042 1 VI 1 65 [ 105) 0.027 1 V 1 89 [ 144) 0.049 1 VI 1 64 [ 1041 0.027 1 V 1 64 [ 1041 0.035 1 V 1 64 [ 1041 0.029 I V I 64 [ 1041 0.024 I V 1 85 [ 136) 0.024 1 IV 1 82 ( 1321 0.024 1 V 1 74 [ 119) 0.033 1 V I 51 [ 82] 0.030 1 V 1 84 [ 1361 0.053 I VI 1 66 [ 1061 0.028 1 V 1 71 [ 1141 0.044 1 VI 1 57 [ 91] 0.026 1 V I 87 [ 140] 0.023 1 IV 1 83 [ 1341 0.020 I IV 1 100 [ 1601 0.020 1 IV 1 100 1 1601 0.025 1 V 1 98 [ 1581 '. Nge I I I I TIME I I I SITE ISITEI APPROX. FILET LAT. I LONG. I DATE I (GMT) IDEPTHIQUAKE I ACC. I MM I DISTANCE CODE I NOP.TH I WEST 1 I H M Sec l (km)1 MAG. 1 9 I INT. 1 mi [Ian) ---- I ------ I ------- I --- --------- I -------- I ----- I ------ I------- I---- I-- --------- PAS 133.5011116.5131 2/25/1980 1104733.51 5.51 5.50 1 0.040 1 V 1 54 ( 871 PAS 133.0 ?31115.6321 4/26/1981 112 928.41 5.51 5.70 1 0.029 1 V 1 94 [ 151) PAS 133.9931116.6061 7/ 811986 1 92044.51 5.51 5.60 1 0.032 1 V 1 77 ( 1231 PAS 132.9711117.8701 7/13/1986 11347 8.21 5.51 5.30 1 0.050 1 VI 1 36 [ S8) PAS 134.0611118.0791 10/ 1/1987 1144220.01 5.51 5.90 1 0.034 1 V 1 86 [ 138) PAS 134.0731118.0981 10/ 4/1987 1105938.21 5.51 5.30 1 0.025 1 V 1 87 ( 140] PAS 133.0821115.7751 11/24/1937 1 15414.51 5.51 5.80 1 0.032 1 V 1 66 [ 138) PAS 133.0131115.8391 11/24/1987 1131556.51 5.51 6.00 1 0.037 1 V 1 82 ( 132] GSP 134.1401117.7001 2/28/1990 1234336.61 5.51 5.20 1 0.025 1 V 1 81 ( 130) GSP 134.2621118.0021 6/28/1991 1144354.51 5.51 5.40 1 0.024 1 V 1 95 [ 1531 GSP 133.9611116.3181 4/23/1992 1045023.01 5.51 6.10 1 0.038 1 V 1 84 [ 135) GSIT 134.2011116.4361 6/28/1992 1115734.11 5.51 7.60 1 0.074 1 VIII 94 ( 1511 GSP 134.1391116.4311 6/28/1992 1123640.61 5.51 5.10 1 0.022 1 IV I 90 [ 1451 GSP 134.3411116.5291 6/28/1992 1124053.51 5.51 5.20 1 0.021 1 IV 1 100 [ 1611 GSP 134.1631116.8551 6/28/1992 11443121.01 5.51 5.30 1 0.026 1 V 1 82 ( 1311 GSN 134.2031116.8271 6/28/1992 1150530.71 5.51 6.70 1 0.051 1 VI 1 85 [ 1361 GSP 134.1081116.4041 6/29/1992 1141338.81 5.51 5.40 1 0.026 1 V 1 89 [ 1441 GSP 133.8761116.2671 6/29/1992 1160142.81 5.51 5.20 1 0.025 1 V 1 82 [ 1311 GSP 134.2391116.8371 7/ 9/1992 1014357.61 3.51 5.30 1 0.025 1 V 1 87 ( 1401 GSP 133.9021116.2841 7/24/1992 1181436.21 5.51 5.00 1 0.022 1 IV 1 82 [ 1321 GSP 134.1951116.8621 8/17/1992 1204152.11 5.51 5.30 1 0.026 1 V 1 84 [ 1351 GSP 134.0641116.3611 911511992 1084711.31 5.51 5.20 1 0.024 1 IV 1 68 ( 142] GSP 134.3401116.9001 11/27/1992 1160057.51 5.51 5.30 1 0.024 1 IV 1 93 [ 149) GSP 134.3691116.6971 12/ 4/1992 1020857.51 5.51 5.30 1 0.023 1 IV 1 95 [ 1531 GSP 134.0291116.3211 8/21/1993 1014638.41 5.51 5.00 1 0.021 1 IV I Be [ 141] GSP 134.2681116.4021 6/16/1994 1162427.51 5.51 5.00 1 0.019 1 IV 1 99 [ 159] ................................................ ............................... -END OF SEARCH- 142 RECORDS FOUND COMPUTER TIME REQUIRED FOR EARTHQUAKE SEARCH: 0.5 minutes MAXIMUM SITE ACCELERATION DURING TIME PERIOD 1800 TO 1998: 0.436g MAXIMUM SITE INTENSITY (MM) DUPING TIME PERIOD 1800 TO 1998: X MAXIMUM MAGI4ITUDE ENCOUNTERED IN SEARCH: 7.60 NEAREST HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKE WAS ABOUT 3 MILES AWAY FROM SITE. NUMBER. OF YEARS REPRESENTED BY SEARCH: 199 years RESULTS OF PROBABILITY ANALYSES - ------------------------ ------ TIME PERIOD OF SEARCH: 1800 TO 1998 LENGTH OF SEARCH TIME: 199 years ATTENUATION RELATION: 12) Boore e* al. (1993) Horiz. - Larger - Site Class C ••` TIME PERIOD OF EXPOSURE FOR PROBABILITY: 25 years PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE FOR ACCELERATION --------------------- --------------- - - - - -- INO.OFI AVE. IRECURR..1 COMPUTED PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDAINCE1 ACC. I TIMES IOCCUR. I INTER ;.I in 1 in I in I in I in 1 in I in g IEXCED1 t /yr 1 years 10.5 yrl 1 yr1 10 yrI 50 yrl 75 yr1100 yrl**' yr ---- I ----- I ------ I ------- I ------ I ------ I ------ I ------ I ------ I ------ I ------ 0.011 1421 0.7141 1.40110. 300110. 510110.9 )9211.000011.000011.000011.0000 0.021 1371 0.6881 1.45310.291210.497610. 999011 .000011.000011.000011.0000 0.031 571 0.2861 3.49110.133410. 249110. 913011 .000011.000011.000010.9992 0.041 351 0.1761 5.68610.084210.161310. 827710 .999811.000011.000010.9877 0.051 211 0.1061 9.47610. 051410. 100210. 651910 .994910.999611.000010.9285 0.061 101 0.0501 19.90010.024810.049010. 395010 .918910.976910.993410.7153 0.071 61 0.0301 33. 16710. 015010. 029710. 260310 .778510.895810.951010.5294 0.091 31 0.0151 66.33310.007510.0150 10.1399 10.5294 10.6772 10.778510.3140 0.091 21 0.0101 99.500 10.0050 10.0100 10.0956 10.3950 10. 5294 10. 6340 10.2222 0.101 11 0 .005 1199.00010.002510.0050 10.0490 10.2222 10.3140 10.3950 10.1181 0.111 11 0.005 1199.00010.002510.0050 10.0490 10.2222 10.3140 10. 3950 10.1181 0.121 11 0.005 1199.00010.002510.0050 10.0490 10.2222 10.3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.131 11 0. 005 1199. 000 10.0025 10.0050 10.0490 10.2222 10. 3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.141 11 0. 005 1199.000 10.0025 10.0050 10.049010.2222 10.3140 10. 3950 10. 1181 0.151 11 0. 005 1199. 000 10.0025 10.0050 10. 049010.2222 10. 3140 10. 395010. 1181 0.161 11 0 . 005 1199. 000 10. 0025 10.0050 10.0490 10.2222 10. 3110 10. 3950 10. 1181 0.171 11 0. 005 1199.00010.002510.0050 10.045010. 2222 10.3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.181 11 0. 005 1199.000 10.0025 10.0050 10.049010.2222 10.3110 10. 3950 10. 1181 0.191 11 0. 005 1199.000 10.0025 10. 0050 10.049010.2222 10. 3140 10. 395010. 1181 0.201 11 0.005 1199. 000 10. 0025 10.005010.049010.2222 10.3140 10.3950 10.1181 0.211 11 0. 005 1199. 000 10.0025 10. 0050 10. 049010. 2222 10.3140 10. 3950 10. 1181 0.221 11 0.0051199.00010.002510. 005010. 049010 .222210.314010.395010.1181 0.231 11 0.005 1195.000 10. 0025 10.005010.0490 10. 2222 10.3140 10. 3950 10. 1181 0.241 11 0.005 1199.000 10.0025 10.0050 10.0490 10.2222 10.3140 10.3950 10.1181 0.251 11 0.005 1199. 000 10.0025 10.0050 10.0490 10. 2222 10.3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.261 11 0.005 1199. 000 10. 0025 10.0050 10. 0190 10. 2222 10.3140 10. 3950 10. 1181 0.271 11 0. 005 1199.000 10.0025 10.0050 10.0490 10.2222 10.3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.281 11 0.005 1199.000 10.0025 10.0050 10.0490 10.2222 10.3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.291 11 0.0051199.00010.002510.005010.0490 10.2222 10.314010.3950 10. 1181 0.301 11 0.005 1199.000 10.0025 10.0050 10.0490 10.2222 10.3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.311 31 0.005 1199.000 10. 0025 10.0050 10. 019010.2222 10.3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.321 11 0.005 1199.000 10.0025 10.0050 10. 049010.2222 10.3140 10. 3950 10. 1181 0.331 11 0. 005 1199. 000 10. 0025 10.0050 10. 0490 10.2222 10.3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.341 11 0. 005 1199.000 10.0025 10.0050 10.049010.2222 10.3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.351 11 0. 005 1199. 000 10. 0025 10. 0050 1(). 0490 10. 2222 10. 3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.361 11 0. 005 1199.000 10.0025 10.0050 10.0490 10.2222 10.3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.371 11 0. 005 1199. 000 10.0025 10.0050 10. 0490 10. 2222 10. 3140 10.3950 10. 1181 0.381 11 0. 005 1199. 000 10. 0025 10.0050 10. 0490 10. 2222 10.3140 10. 3950 10. 1181 0.391 11 0. 005 1199. 000 10.002510.0050 10.049010.2222 10.3140 10. 395010. 1181 0.401 11 0. 005 1199. 000 10. 0025 10.0050 10. 0490 10.2222 10.3140 10.395010. 1181 0.411 11 0. 005 1199.000 10.0025 10.0050 10. 0490 10.2222 10. 3140 10 . 3950 10. 1181 0.421 11 0. 005 1199. 000 10.0025 10.0050 10.0490 10.11222 10. 3140 10. 3950 10. 1181 0.431 11 0. 005 1199. 000 10. 0025 10.0050 10. 04QO 10.2222 10. 3140 10. 3950 10. 1181 -------------------------------------------- ---- --- ------- -- -- ----- -- - - - -- '. PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE FOR MAGNITUDE ------- ------------------------- ------ INO.OFI AVE. IRECURR.I WMPUTED PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE MAG.ITIMESIOCCUP..IINTERV.I in I in I in I in I in I in I in IEXCEDI Vyr I years 10.5 yr1 1 yr1 10 yr1 50 yr1 75 yr1100 yrl••• yr ---- I ----- I ------ I ------- I ------ I ------ I ------ I ------ 1 ------ I ------ I ------ 5.001 1421 0.7141 1. 40110. 300110.510110. 9992 11. 000011. 0000 11. 0000 11 . 0000 5.501 511 0.2561 3. 902 10. 1203 10. 226110. 9229 11 . 0000 11. 0000 11 . 0000 1 o. 9984 6.001 261 0.1311 7. 654 10. O632 10. 1225 10. 7292 10.998510. 9999 11 . 0000 10.9619 6.501 101 0.0501 19.90010. 024810.049010. 395010 .918910.976910.993410.7153 7.001 31 0.0151 66. 333 10. 0075 10.0150 10 .1399 10 .5294 10. 6772 10.7785 10. 314 0 7.5011 11 0.0051199.0001 D. 0025 10. 0050 10 - 0490 10 .2222 10. 314 0 10. 3950 10. 1181 ------------------------------------------- ---- ---- ---- --------- ---- ------ GUTE14BM d RICHTER RECURRENCE RELATIONSHIP: a- value= 3.515 L- value 0.737 beta - value 1.698 DATE: Saturday, August 1, 1998 .....• .•...•...• ................a.•.. E 4 F A U L T Ver. 2.01 ..................... (Estimation (Estimation of Peak Horizontal Acceleration From Digitized California Faults) SEARCH PERFORMED FOR: Sladden Engineering JOB NUMBER: 444 -8092 JOB NAME: Encinitas SITE COORDINATES: LATITUDE: 33.0286 N LONGITUDE: 117.255 N SEARCH RADIUS: 100 mi ATTENUATION RELATION: 12) Boors et al. (1993) Horiz. - Larger - Site Class C UNCERTAINTY (M-Mean, S- Meantl- Sigma): M SCOND: 0 COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FAULT -DATA FILE USED: CALIFLT.DAT SOURCE OF DEPTH VALUES (A= Attenuation File, F =Fault Data File) : A DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS ----------------------- - - - - -- Page 1 --------------------------- ------------------------------ I I IMAX. CREDIBLE EVENTIIMAX. PROBABLE EVENTI I 1 APPROX. I------------------- 11-------------------I I ABBREVIATED (DISTANCE I MAX.( PEAK I SITE II PWX.I PEAK I SITE I I FAULT NAME I mi (YSm) ICRED.1 SITE IINTENSIIPP.OB.I SITE 1I11TENSI I I I-------------------------- I--------- I I----- MAG.IACC. I--- gl MM II MAG.IACC. g MM I ]BLUE CUT 1 I-------------------------- 84 (135)1 7.1001 ---I-- 0.0601 ----11----- VI 11 I-- 6.001 ----I------I 0.0361 V I I--------- IBORREGO MTV. (San Jacinto) 1 I------------------------ 63 I----- (102) 1 I---- 6.501 -- I-- 0.0581 ---- 11--- VI 11 -- I-- 5.751 ----I-- 0.0401 --- -I V I -- I ICAMP POCK- EMER.- COPPER. MTNI I-------------------------- ------- 99 -- I (16011 ----- I 7.001 ------ I 0.0521 ------ 11----- VI 11 I------ 5.751 I 0.0281 ------ I V I I--------- ICASA LOM.A -CLARK fS.Jacin.)l I-------------------------- 51 I----- ( 82)1 I---- 7.001 -- 1-- 0.0881 ----11- VII 11 ---- I----- 6.751 -I- 0.0771 -- - - -I VII I I------ ICATALINA ESCARPMENT 1 I--- ------------------- I-------- 41 ---I-- ( 66)1 I----- --- I------ 7.001 I------ 0.1041 I1 VII 11 - -- - -I 6.251 - ---- I 0.0721 - ----- I VI I -- ICHINO 1 I-------------------------- 56 ( 89)1 I--- 7.001 ---I------11-----I------I- 0.0821 VII 11 5.501 0.0391 ----I V I I--------- (COYOTE CREEK (San Jacinto)( 52 I----- ( 83)1 I------ 7.001 I------11----- 0.0871 VII II I----- 5.751 -I- 0.0471 -----I VI I I------------------ -------- I ICUCAMONGA 1 I-------------------------- I --------- 80 --------- I (128)1 I ----- I 7.001 ------ I------ 0.0621 11----- VI 11 I------ 6.251 I 0.0431 ------ I VI I IELSI140RE 1 28 ( 45)1 ----- I 7.501 ------ I 0.1801 ----- - II----- VIII 11 I----- 6.751 - I 0.1241 - ----- I VIZ I I-------------------------- I--------- IEL'iSIAN PARK SEISMIC ZONE ] 86 I----- (138) 1 I----- 7.001 -I-- 0.0591 ---- 11---- VI II -I------I- 5.751 0.0321 -- ---I V I I-------------------------- I IGLN.HELEN -LYTLE CR- CLRMITI I------------------------- --------- 56 I ( 90)1 ----- I 7.001 ------ I 0.0821 ------ I1----- VII II I 6.501 ------ I 0.0641 - - ---- I VI I I--------- IHELEIIDALE 1 90 I----- (145)1 I--- 7.301 ---I------11-----I 0.0661 VI 11 5.751 ------ I- 0.0301 --- - -I V I I------------------ ------ -- I IHOMESTEAD VALLEY 1 I-------------------------- -- ---- 99 --- I (160)1 ----- I 7.501 ------ I------ 0.0671 11----- VI II I 4.001 ----- - I 0.0121 - - - - - - I III 1 I--------- IHOT S -BUCK RDG. (S.Jacinto) 1 I-------------------------- 53 I----- ( 85) 1 I----- 7.001 -I--- 0.0851 ---11-- VII II ---I------ 6.001 I- 0.0521 - - - --I VI I I--------- (IMPERIAL - BRAWLEY 1 I-------------------------- 98 I----- (158)1 I----- 7.001 -I------11--- 0.0531 VI 11 --I-- 6.751 ----I- 0.0471 - -- - -I VI I I I JOHNSON VALLEY 1 I-------------------------- --------- 92 I (148)1 ----- I 7.501 ------ I 0.0721 ---- -- II VI 11 --- -- I 5.251 ----- - I 0.0231 - -- - - - I IV I I ILA NACI0N 1 I-------------------------- --------- 15 I ( 23)1 ----- I 6.501 ------ I 0.1791 --- --- II VIII 11 --- -- I 4.251 ---- -- I ------ 0.0581 I VI I I--------- ILENWOOD -OLD WOMAN SPRINGS 1 I-------------------------- 97 I----- (156) 1 I----- 7.301 -I----- 0.0621 -11--- VI 11 --I--- 5.251 --- I- 0.0221 - - ---I IV I I--------- I NEWPORT- I14GLEWOOD- OFFSHORE( I------------------ -------- I 13 --- I----- ( 21)1 I---- 7.001 --I------11-----I- 0.2451 IX 11 5.751 ---- -I- 0.1311 - - - --I VIII I NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE 1 I-------------------------- ------ 86 I (138) 1 ----- I 7.701 ------ I------ 0.0831 11----- VII II I------ 5.751 I ------ 0.0321 I V I I IPALOS VEPD- CORON.B.- A.BLAIII I--------------- --------- 19 I ( 31) 1 ----- I 7.501 ---- -- I 0.2371 --- --- II IX 11 -- --- I 6.751 ------ I -- 0.1631 - - - - I VIII I -- --------- I--------- IPIIITO MOUNTAIN - MORONGO 1 I-------------------------- 78 I----- (126)1 I- 7.301 ---- I 0.0731 --- --- II VII II ----- I 5.751 ------ I - 0.0341 - - - - - I V I I--------- I RAYMOND ] I-------------- 89 I----- (143)1 I------ 7.501 I------ 0.0731 11-----I- VII 11 4.001 -----I- 0.0131 - ----1 III 1 --------- I IPOSE CANYON 1 --------- 5 I ( 8)1 ----- I 7.001 -- --- I------ 0.4771 11----- X 11 I 6.001 ----- - I ------ 0.2901 I IX I 1------------------ ------- -I-- ISAII ANDREAS (Ccachalla V.) 1 1----------------- --------I--------- -------I-----I------ 77 (124) 1 I-----I------ 8.001 I------ 0.1051 I------ I VII 11 I I----- I------ 7.001 I----- I I -- 0.0641 ---- - I ------ --- I VI I I ----------------------------- DETEPPIINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS ------------------- ---- - - - - -- Page ^c ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- I IMAX. CREDIBLE EVENTIIMAX. PROBABLE EVENTI I APPROX. I------------- - - - - -- 11-------------- - - - --I I A89R- EVIATEED IDISTAIICE I MAX.I PEAK I SITE II MAX I PEAK I SITE I I FAULT NAME I mi (kml ICRED.I SITE 1111TEIISI IPROB.1 SITE IINTENSI I I I-------------------------- I MAG.IACC. gl M1 1I MAG.IACC. gl MM I I ISAiI AllDP.E.AS (Mojave) 1 I-------------------------- I--------- --------- 68 I (141)1 ----- I 8.501 ----- - I 0.1221 ------ II VII II - -- -- I 8.251 -- ---- I 0.1071 - - -- - - I VII 1 ISAN A14DREAS (S. Bern.Mtn.)l I-------------------------- I 74 --------- I----- (12011 I I---- 8.001 --I--- 0.1081 --- 11- VII II ----I----- 6.751 I-- 0.0581 ----I VI I ISAN CLEMENTE - SAN ISIDRO 1 I-------------------------- I 51 ( 82) 1 ----- I 8.001 ---- -- I 0.1451 ------ II VIII 11 ---- - I 6.501 ----- - I - 0.0691 --- - - I VI I ISAND HILLS 1 I-------------------------- --------- 93 I (149)1 ----- I 8.001 ------ I 0.0911 ---- -- II VII 11 ----- I 6.751 ---- -- I --- 0.0491 -- - I VI I I ISAN DIEGO TRGH. -BAHIA SOL.I I-------------------------- I--------- --------- 29 I ( 47) 1 ----- I 7.501 ---- -- I 0.1721 --- --- II VIII II - --- - I 6.251 ------ I - 0.0921 ----- I VII I ISAN GABRIEL 1 I----------------- --------- I 93 I----- (150)1 I---- 7.001 --I--- 0.0551 -- -11---- VI II -I- 5.751 ----- I- 0.0301 -----I V I ISAN GORGONIO - BANNING 1 I-------------------------- -------- 67 I (108)1 ----- I 7.501 ------ I------ 0.0911 11----- VII II I------ 7.001 I ------ 0.0711 I VI I I ISA1TA MONICA - HOLLYWOOD 1 I-------------------------- --------- 94 I (151) 1 ----- I 7.501 --- --- I 0.0701 ------ II- VI II -- --I---- 5.251 -- I ------ 0.0231 I IV I I--------- ISIERRA MADRE -SAN FERNANDO 181 I-------------------------- I --------- I----- (131) 1 I----- 7.301 -I---- 0.0711 -- 11--- VI 11 --I---- 6.301 --I- 0.0431 -- ---I VI I ISUPERSTITION HLS. (S.Jacin) 1 I------------------------- I--------- 81 I (131) 1 ----- I 7.001 ---- -- I ------ 0.0611 II VI II - -- -- I 6.251 ------ I - 0.0421 ---- - I VI I ISUPERSTITION MTN. (S.Jacin) 1 I-------------------------- I--------- 76 I----- (122) 1 I----- 7.001 -I-- 0.0641 -- --11----- VI II I- 6.251 -----I---- 0.0441 - -I VI I IVERDUGO 1 I-------------------------- 91 I----- (146)1 I------ 6.701 I------ 0.0481 11-- VI II --- I------ 4.501 I- 0.0161 -----I IV I I--------- ]WHITTIER - NORTH ELSINORE 1 I-------------------------- I 54 I----- ( 87)1 I---- 7.501 --I------11---- 0.1081 VII 11 -I-- 6.001 -- --I-- 0.0511 - ---I VI I --------- ........................................•..... 1----- I ------ I ------ II--- .................1..........•.. -- I ------ I ------ i -END OF SEARCH- 38 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS. THE ROSE CANYON FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT IS ABOUT 4.7 MILES AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM- CREDIBLE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.477 g LARGEST MAXIMUM - PROBABLE SITE ACCELEPATION: 0.290 g Liquefaction Analysis Boring No.: 1 Drilled: 925/98 Job name: Alzheimers Cafe Facility Job No.: Water 35 am" 0.29 Depth(fl.) 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 Approx. Soil Dens. 105 105 105 105 Sigma(0) 3675 4200 4725 5250 Sigma(0)bar 3675 3888 4101 4314 Tons/R "2 1.838 1.944 2.051 2.157 CN 0.738 0.717 0.696 0.681 N 13 11 11 21 Corrected Blowmunts Nr 9.6 7.9 7.7 14.3 T�tlaujSiomaf 0.95 0.93 0.91 0.89 ZO)effec$bve 0.179 0.169 0.198 0.204 L 0.18 0.08 0.07 0.15 F.S. CSRUCSRE 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.7 Sand,_ silt or clay; 8 %fi nes sand, 15.35% sand, <15% sand, 15-35% sand, <15% S I T E P L A N CASE NO. 98 -236 M.U.P. /C. D. P. /E. I.A. MODIFICATION PROJECT DATA: � G�RAUERNFOUNDATION � N EDUCATION _. AL elan -- -- -'^: WII .- ,r- .'r�ues�' «,r 4 e SNIS CI.0 Sµ EX p, E, Ex wATEa Nras. 2210 EN° IC�® FOR FOR 4oarN SAWCUT EXIST PVMT @ fX }Di EXIST. AL DER ri0 BE BEHOVED)\ 126...__.. — _ ; T �! ,�.� 1 OPOSED ��r. -i o I PR fo' 5g 53 to _ _ G�.TE POST$ _ MONUMENT 1 SITE CORNF, !ANN' - 5..,...s.. .mac$ �,�,..,,_ sIGN_ STE AM9UDpd ; �/ EXIST AL IN/HT RO A. 20 AgIVAIS ._ �O ID -� G I— Te p8�� ERI SC L SFRi�� 6 Rrw � ' e D .: °ems - ¶�-LT L' _ zx_ ? *_ 1' uTIL}Tr EA ENO DNLV ; P BmE LPI Nr , GES P RHI ED 1 ZONE`i 68+3 4� .I L• EXIST. CUBE AND GU TER iRA9l E �j 5 - -Inp B lC M E. ( SETBACKS: ® SP NET �- INSTALL 5" AC PVMT OVER E AG. EASE 'TFA AFE 2 - �.. E }3d iC D�CS Cue G YEA SET ACKS:B�= FRONT YARD 26 PROPOEEO 6" LURE AND GUTTER ST0 OWG G-z aFLIIITECW CIYfS \ d ]309 WW PEAR Y"4P® �� yc ]dL5 VAA I _ SIDE YARD 96` PROPOSED 5' WZDE PLL EIL£WALK - r� W W - EXT. SIDE YARD 10' 9T0 DWG G -) I 1 (l )39J C I ' \ �� AR01>N7 I I 1 L07 COVE E: 21,�SE.OS.lAC68E TYPICAL STREET SECTION " °� `r a s " n lI EL M REAL T E, 1 FLOOR AREA RATIO: 10.92% CAINO -- — (� F- Nrs I -i .� _ LL I REQUIRED PARKING SPACES: 40 PROVIDED SPACES: 57 14 i 1 x x [ ' J _ - LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE EASTERLY 498 FEET OP THE N.E. 1 /4 OF THE 1 ; y.. _ 3T J .AL eEBM;E.... OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF THE S.E. 1 /ASEC. rC 3! zs E arw F \ I /40H THE S.E. 9l4; AND THE N. 7/40F'W9E S.E. 9/4 23 T. 13 S., R. 4 "Aro'. EE BrHOV� EARTHWORK QUANTPRES: 7. CY CUT; 7,890 CY FILL I ql / 1 i 3. z IGH �1 Ti4ATTHESE VALUES ARE CALCULATED BASED ON THE _ NE mI " °NOTE ET.XAL SURFACE. A TUALQ BETWEEN QUAY FILED EROS VINGGRY DUE TO SaLVSHED PHASE 2 k� suRP, aQE. ac�H�LQU�TTESIwAYVARYOUErQSQOa. 1 h PERMANENT ,3Tp Te- ,z>a CCvARAC6ERISTICS THAT CANNOT BE. ACCURATELY ACCOUNTED oNC cUae AND Eunfa mm t 1 FOR AT THISHME, SOME IMPORT OR EXPORT MAY BE NECESSARY TYPICAL STREET SECTION ` " i PAD ELEV I39.o `s le -000NS6RUCT THIS PROJECT IN CONFORMANCE MTN THIS MAP. Tfrvrvs CLNTm a+roE FF = 139.75 MODIFICATION. PHASING Nom: 1 ai zs.E Dw 1 TENNIS CLDE DRIVE \ ggI 7 -�'m " z5.9 Tw I PHASE 1: RELOCATABLE BUILDINGS ON SOUTHERLY PAD ONLY. PHASE 2: RELOCATABLE BU'ILDNGS ON SOUTHERLY PAD AND PERMANENT NOTE ,z I BLDG. ON NORTHERLY PAD. �I SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS PHASE 3: REMOVE RELOCATABLE BUILDINGS ON SOUTHERLY PAD AND �) FOR BUILDING LOCATION AND IGH 1Q CONSTRUCT SECOND PERMANENT BUILDING. CONFIGURATIONS. 3E5 TC QItN - aL. (3 SITE EwR i h PAD ELEV= 139.x9 c _ I , LEGEND: NANCMESTEB 15E Tw PROJECT DoOUHDDG^Q6'RY OGl°,QADINe L61mn --- -�._.. I / I E /`� � M.H. ( C�R411H® OONfuOMGiD ' t. E ROaTIHO ROOM OF T AWERNPHST >m PHASE 1 - I I RELOCATABLE PSOR_ _En 1 s I ` CLASSROOMS I3 ip r i PROPOSED 60Nr. owo� Dov o MANCHESTER al II PAD ELBE =. 138.0 w - Prw I PROPON6C OOH14URS - -__- RI I FF = 140.0 1 PpOPOSfED CURB ARID ON1T3P'HP VICINITY MAP I P@30POoffiCFDP/VIG311HCPaAT" „oT T@ scALE I - I� zi PROPOSED RNiLa1YM DANE —w w- Ilk, Q s Izo,< Iw 1 NTFiODPORED ffi GT LIHCO is r pis \ V T - PPOPORGED RETIMNENO WALL QC 70H1% 1 w`A ,aae n PROPOSED PYRE GRnfim4 a3AS rc v oR M � II 138 iG' 1 ` Q P PAVEMENT ..A), IRe aucK E - ' ,az 11TG9 L / � I I i ue I/W PWOPOaYiND U"QQ^H�OPBILNsP O 's LLL� { z{ curl z1 r-ILL pOFEDSIO 1 yQ�o �� A QS m: I a RouNa, 3. I 1341 c ,u3z rt n I PPOo POORDD 07REEET UQH7 71 Y yyI _ v ' t a m a A ExP 03/31/03 n 1 .. 133.) [ '� 1332 9?>TC FUTURE ELECTRICAL SERVCE TRANSFORMER, ELECTRIICAL L SERVICE & METERNG STRIBION EQUIPMENT FINAL LOCATION S CALCUEATONS AND EETAILS TO BE DETERM NEO. RE III PHOTOCELL UNIT AT THIS UX7URE ONLY. CONNEGI' TO lIMECLOGN CpLS SSEMBLY AT ELECTRICAL SERI CE EOU PMENT < 1 l 0 , L_ �0 •ix '�' � - 3 SERIADE U ECLCCK ASSEMBLY WI PHOTOCELL INTERFACE AT EECTRICAL y� VICEIGLETRIBUnON EQUIPMENT. H P R 2E 5 ONE .. -IS ) wu, 1 Fi L. ,maw Es � Re-1— APP DYED oATe _ : ""`� a" N eV - - - -_ ` "`" a" OF HNCINTC.4S COMMUNITY DEVEI.OPMEN'I' DEPT DRAR'AIO NO. m„ RErERENCes oATe HHNCfIIdARIC SCALE CO DEVHL.OPMEN'f APPROVALS _ LITY OF ENCINIIAE P -OOd PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION Of RECOMMENDED APPROVE() SITE PLAN DRAWING FOR �dym PK D SHIN R IN EL AMINO BEN G w P DATE 21a1 EY - -_ EY: THE GRAUER FOUNDATION MEDIAN N. OF SEDIMENT BASIN. / _. S'A'N ?:�,E NO RR577 -. DATE DATE FOR EDUCATION veRTicAE wAYNE AA _. 1� l! EL: 11248 DATUM: USC6G5 Ex0 03/31/03 _ -- WORK PROJECT NO. W-7-61 SHEET S OF PE 7— GENERAL NOTES EROSION CONTROL 1.ALL OW( SHALL BE HUNG IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS. THE 1 IN CASE EMERGENCY WOWS IS REWIRED, CONTACT STUART STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FGR PUBLIC NGRE CONSTRUCTION. THE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS OF THE CITY W ENCINITAS ANO GRAVER AT (760) 944 -6777 OEGIGN HE SAN DIEGO AREA REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS NY CHANGES 2 EQUIPMENT AND WORNERB FOH EMERGENCY WOW( SHALL BE MADE GR REVISIONS THEREFROM SMALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY NEWEST FOR INSPECTION. AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING THE RAINY SEASON. ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS SHALL BE STNCKPILEG ON SITE AT _ 2..APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL W SIZES �TRUCTION GAIN CONY TENT LOCATIONS WHEN IMMINENT LOCATION AND TYPE OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES, NOR OF IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN STREET RIGHT OF -WAYS SEPARATE APPROVALS AMR PERMITS FOR THERE SHALL BE REQUIRED IN CONJUNCTION WITH IMPROVEMENT W DEVICES SHOWN US PLANS SHALL NGT BE MOVED OR MODIFIED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR. XMANUFACTURER: ECOAEGIS (800) 426 -6002 4 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTRW G.WRITTEN PERMISSION SHALL BE UBTAINED FOR ANY OFF -SITE RAGING W ICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATIS SNOW W THE CITY ENGINEER AFTER EACH RUN OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL. 4—TRACTOR SHALL TAKE ANY NECESSARY PRECAUTIWS REWIRED i0 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES WRING GRADING WERATIONS. AN THING DAMAGED OR DESTROYED SHALL BE REPLACES OR REPAIRED MEASWES AS MAY BE RESTIAEO BY THE CITY ENGINEER WE TO N GR UNFORESEEN AN INCOMPLETE WNICHNMA 0 CONDITION EXISTING III i0 GRADING. YT�ARISE 5-THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE THAT ANY MONUMENT GP 6 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND SHALL E NECES PRECAUTIONS 0 PREVENT PUBLIC RESPASS ONTO AREAS BENCH MARK WHICH IS DISTURBED OR DESTROYED SHALL BE RE- ANN REPLACED BY A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER OR A WRY HEN IMPUAEED WATERS CREATE A HAZARDOUS CONDITION. ESTABLISHED ICENSED LAND SURVEYOR. 6 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN ALL J ALL ERASION CGNTAG MEASURES PROVIDED PER THE APPROVER GRADING PLAN SHALL BE tNL09P0,9ATE0 HEREON. SAFETY DEVICES INCLUDING SHOOING ANN XU ALL RE AND FEDERAL RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL BALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SNOWN SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE 111E So DAY AATN SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS LAWS AMC REGWATIGNS PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FIXITY PERCENT (4G %) SILT BE REMOVED EACH RAINFALL. 7- GRADING ANp EQUIPMENT OPERATING WITHIN ONE HALF (1/2) MILE OF AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL AFTER BSTRUCTURE FOR WOMAN OCCUPANCY SHALL NOT BE CONCIILTEG THE OF 530 PR AND 730 AR NOR IN .... ETWEEN HOURS SATURDAYS SUNDAYS AGE CITY RECOGNIZED HOLIDAYS .._ B.. NO GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL COMMENCE UNTIL A PREDICTING ". MEETING HAS BEEN HELD CNSITE WITH THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE PRESENT: CITY INSPECTOR, CIVIL ENGINEER SOILS ENGINEER GRADING CONTRACTOR AND PERMITTEE THE PREGRADE MEETING SHALL BE SCRECOLEO WITH PRO CITY AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE BY CALLING (619) 944 3374. 9 PRIOA TO HAULING DIRT ON CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TO ANY ORAL GIN ENG NEER R &Q SUBMIT TO AANN RECEIVE PPROVALS EC CITY SMILE, THE ENGINEER ACLU CONDITIONS THE CITY PAY IMPUSEH WITH REGARDS TO THE HAILING OPERATION. 10. UPON FINAL COMPLETION OF THE WGRK UNDER THE GRADING PEAMZI A BUT PRIOR TO FINAL GRADING APPROVAL ANG /OR FINAL RELEASE OF SECURITY, AND AS- GRADED CERTIFICATION SHALL BE PROVIDED m STATING' THE GRADSO LWDER PERMIT NO _ HAS BEEN PERFORMED SN SUBSTANTIAL E AITAIREN WITH THE APPROVED THE ATTATHEO AS GASSED PLAN GRADING PLAN OR AS SHOWN L G BY THESCIVILEENGINEERLWHO RE CERTIFIEST SUCH FADING OPERATICAL TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPERLY GRADE ALL EXCAVATED SURFACES TO - p1 SHO AVOID 0 MOGE i0 ADJOINING SHA" ROLS SURFACE WATEP AND PROPERTIES W TO FINISHED WORK ON THE SITE A. SHALL TAKE REMEDIAL NEASLNFEB O PAEVENi EROSION DD FRESHLY GRACED AREAS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS PERMANENT DRAINAGE A. EROSIGN CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED BAGS LAID ON CWiO(IR 0 PROVIDE LEVEL LINE 12-A L AREAS TO BE FILLED SMALL BE PREPARED TO BE FILLED AND FILL SNAIL RE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STAIEARD AND OBJECTIONABLE ✓SPILLWAY LOCATION 8888868°88886888 SPECiFICATI0N5 ALL VEGETABLE MATTER MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED BY THS CONTRACTOR FROH THE SURFACE 88888888 88686888 _ I BAG HIGH 9 / 2 BAGS UPON WHICH THE FILL IS TO BE PLACED LWSE FILL AND ALLUVIAL SOILS SHALL BE REMOVED TO SUSTABLE FIRM NATURAL UNG THE E-1 -HIGH �. A. EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF ANO IT AND CONiRAOLORS BEEF TRILITY 0 PSLA CE, SPREAD, TER L'OMPACi THE FILL IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS, 1 1 iV LEQAL DESCRIPTION THE EASTERLY 498 FEET OF HE RE 114 OF THE NE, T/ OF THE SE, 1/4: AND THE N. 114 OF THE SE 114 GF THE NE 114 OF THE BE, /1 SEC 23 T. S D. I. A.P.N.: 262 -16,11 ,ADDRESS SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EL LAMING REAL AND TENNIS CLUB DRIVE, BERMITTEE ANDAL RESIDENTIAL CARE. INC. 2070 BUSINESS CENTER OAtVE. SUITE 280 IRVINE. CA. 92612 OWNER RRUNANN CAAATL oIC BISHOP BE SAN DIEGO DOLE ESTIMATED QUANTRIES CUI , 'Y r FILL 0 Cy r IMPORT /EXPORT ' 'Y x u EARTHWORK GUANTITIES ARE EAI MATED FOR PERMIT PURPOSES EULANiITI SLMAA VEAAYI DUE TO C- INKAGERAM. R SWELL ]FAC'TORS1. ENV➢tONMEN NOTES: 1. STEEPEST EXISTING NATURAL $L' GPE ON SITE= WA 2, MAXIMUM VERTICAL DEPTH OF CUT 0 FEET 3. A117 VERTICAL DEPTH AT FLL 0 FEET AVETBGECOEPTN - VOLUME I (C(SE) G FEET 5, AVERBEFFDEPTH ORES OF BE FILL NE F - 0 FEET 6. TOTAL CLEARING AREA: 3.35 ACRES (146320 SQ. FT.) 13.CUT ANN FILL SLOPES SHALL BE CUT A. TRIMMED TO FINISH GRANS ` "µ• TO PRODUCE SMOOTH SURFACES AGO UNIFORM CROSS SECTIGNS. THE 'I B O WITHGU' BENEFIT OF INSPECTION WILL BE SIf�JECT TO REJECTION DD 9 AND REMOVAL. SLOPES OR EXCAVATIONS AND EMBANKMENTS SHALL BE SHAPED, PLANTED AND TRIMMED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OF WORK ANN NOTTAICATTONS AREA OF NO CLEARING" I.. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF DISPORTING UTILITY PIPES AND STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF AVAILABLE RECCROS TO THE BEST BE OUR KNOWLEDGE THERE ARE NO VISBIIEENE SPILLWAY aHP.) EXISTING UTILITIES EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, HOWEVER HE CONTRACTOR IS REWIRED TO TAKE WE PRECAOTIGNARY MEASURES LEFT IN A NEAT AfE INNERLY CONDITION ALL STONES ROOTS ANO 0 ROIECT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES LOCATED AT E WORK SITE IT IS HE LONipACTOR S RESPONSIBILITY TO THE P CO C FOLLOWING RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE . OLEO LNG OWNERS OF SAID UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES PRIOR - NY EXCAVATION OR VERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES ANO NOTIFICATIW CF COMMENCEMENT OF WORK OTHER WASTE MATTER EXPOSED GR EXCAVATION GR EMBANKMENT SLOPES' WHICH ARE LIABLE TO BECOME LOOSENED SHALL BE AEMOVEO ANT DISPOSES OF THE TOE AND TOP OF ALL SLOPES SHALL BE IUIIEED A..SEWEAS 114-1111 B_GAS e ELECTARI -(BOO) 422 -4133 I XMANUFACTURER: ECOAEGIS (800) 426 -6002 ��p " C HER ... 53 5466 WIY d EXISTING AT DIKE— r 0 TELEPH 'E. ..(100) 422 -4139 nre.�l•� ,. „gp6LE.. .(8001 22 -4193 4 '^ I N 9 1 S 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEER S OFFICE 48 �a PRONE -1(619 944 50G3oNIN6 aFY,n�ni oc nn +s cROnnE�ni c cno 13.CUT ANN FILL SLOPES SHALL BE CUT A. TRIMMED TO FINISH GRANS ` "µ• TO PRODUCE SMOOTH SURFACES AGO UNIFORM CROSS SECTIGNS. THE 'I B O WITHGU' BENEFIT OF INSPECTION WILL BE SIf�JECT TO REJECTION DD 9 AND REMOVAL. SLOPES OR EXCAVATIONS AND EMBANKMENTS SHALL BE SHAPED, PLANTED AND TRIMMED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OF WORK ANN .�_ -� 18 AREA OF NO CLEARING" OD VISBIIEENE SPILLWAY aHP.) �,p LEFT IN A NEAT AfE INNERLY CONDITION ALL STONES ROOTS ANO - - ---® P 00 ". pQ =Q -Q OTHER WASTE MATTER EXPOSED GR EXCAVATION GR EMBANKMENT SLOPES' WHICH ARE LIABLE TO BECOME LOOSENED SHALL BE AEMOVEO ANT DISPOSES OF THE TOE AND TOP OF ALL SLOPES SHALL BE IUIIEED �_ _� � RUNOFF " -- 'THREE LAYERS OF GRAVEL BAGS ..I XMANUFACTURER: ECOAEGIS (800) 426 -6002 EXISTING AT DIKE— r ➢ 0 i IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GRADING ORDINANCE. Wt iH ENDS OVERLAPPED I 4 '^ I N 9 1 S APPROVED BY: _ `! �Y :. "'� EXISTING AC PAVEMENT �• ' .. 14.ALL TREES BRUSH GRASS ANN OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE COLLECTED PILED ON OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF OFF THE /_( GAP BETWEEN BAGS DETAIL: GRAVEL BAGS L— _ °" �- SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR SO AS TO LEAVE THE AREAS THAT HAVE R ACTS AS SPILLWAY SOG'39 30 A' 47311 ' BEEN CLEARED WITH APPROVAL OF LOC�ON OF 5 �L SHALL UNSIGHTLY DEBRIS CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE DISPOSAL DF .... T .._ ". ANYSSUCHEMA TERIAL 1. SET POSTS ANC EXCAVATE A 2. STAPLE WIRE FENCING TG 4 BY 4 IN (10 BY 10 CAO HE POSTG. TRENCH UPSLOPE FROM ANN ALONG T E LINE OF POSTS. 3 THE FILTER EXTENOTIIT 4 ANG COMPACT THE SOIL INTO THE TRENCH. ICI II II0��'!IIy FILTER FABRIC AY'M � WIRE _ DETAIL: SILT FENCE APPROVED LEGEND: AREA OF NO CLEARING" 81.470 SF " "': AREA OF LIMITED CLEARING" (REMOVAL 7.408 SF OF COMBUSTIBLES TO SATISFY EFD.) AREA OF COMPLETE CLEARING & GRUB" W/ APPLICATION OF BONDED FIBER 138.912 SF MATRIX PER MANUFACTURERx 1111 XMANUFACTURER: ECOAEGIS (800) 426 -6002 GRAVEL BAGS 2 HIGH ANCHOR VI QUEENS LAYER ALONG S I L Y \ S GRAVEL BAGS AT EXISTING AC LIKE��go��oo�$$e�° ICE A —A (TYPICAL) NOT TO SCALE BEARINGS @ DISTANCES OF "NO CLEARING" AREA DHCZA"`TfONOARESAONSIEL.ECHARGE „q I AM THE I J EIy TTHATA IEHAVETEXERCISED OF NONV FOR CHARGE OVER V THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT AS SEINED IN SECTION 6703 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIGNS CODE B THAT THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT ITN CURRENT STANDARDS. THAT THE CITYK11 INCINIIAGTZSWCONFSINEO A REVIEW ONLY AND DOES NOT RELIEVE E S ENGINEER OF RN, OF MY RESPONSIBILITIES FOR PROJECT DESIGN. I y p �. ,:7/ d-'�J.2- �1�Gp�0 } //) 3 No. 29577 L WAYNE A P CO. AN GATE a' Ezp. 03/39/03 CITY of ENCINITAS P COX I I APPROVED LAN, PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVI/S/I'ON OF RECOMMENDED ( APPF ; GEARING OF: PK 5 SHINER IN EL CANING REAL HORIZONTAL 1 - - � o_ BY /WYE /e.".'� _, �7JiTF��T}F�1+T/'1�V��FR1 }jam J7 �[j MEDIAN N. OF SEDIMENT BASIN - BIr ,.- O e ,L- D E ) 6V: - AL_ •• ...A • . •RS CARE FCC■ I .j j J. VERTICAL: N/A - - _ y aasc0 Ice O. R95n Dare 2/g/r.p�.. onrE �3-� EL: ]12.48 DATUM DEC_ DATES Y __ E P 3 3f 03 WORK PROJECT NO. SHEET 1 C V SITE MANCHESTER 1111 Z F9t ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT 9 �s 4 '^ I N 9 1 S APPROVED BY: _ `! �Y :. "'� MANCHESTER •a. DATE' VICINITY MAP — 10 1111E CITY of ENCINITAS P COX I I APPROVED LAN, PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVI/S/I'ON OF RECOMMENDED ( APPF ; GEARING OF: PK 5 SHINER IN EL CANING REAL HORIZONTAL 1 - - � o_ BY /WYE /e.".'� _, �7JiTF��T}F�1+T/'1�V��FR1 }jam J7 �[j MEDIAN N. OF SEDIMENT BASIN - BIr ,.- O e ,L- D E ) 6V: - AL_ •• ...A • . •RS CARE FCC■ I .j j J. VERTICAL: N/A - - _ y aasc0 Ice O. R95n Dare 2/g/r.p�.. onrE �3-� EL: ]12.48 DATUM DEC_ DATES Y __ E P 3 3f 03 WORK PROJECT NO. SHEET 1 GENCi NOTES A PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FREAR THE C OP E ENGINESTINB SERVICES DREART NT FOF A N K ✓ W WITHIN L'HE STREET RSfiHT E WAY. THE SURUCTURAL SECTION SHAH BE Z ACCORDANCE WITH CITY T S PUBLIC ROAD STANDARDS CVALUE TESTS SHALL BC FlEO—I PRIOR 10 NSTRUCTION. fPUBL ICI 3 APPROVAL OF THESE IMPROVEMENT PLANS AS SHDI —5 NOT CONBT,ITUJE APPROVAL OF ANY CONSTRUCTION DUASIOE THE PROJECT SOUNOARY, 4 """"M UTILITIES WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, ONBCTES A.. TESTED PRIOR TO LbNBYRUCTION OF BERM, CURB. (OPES.S BUTTER AND PAVING. 5 THE EXISTENCE AM LOC'A'TION OF EXISTING DOMINIONS FACZL IT GROWN ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTAINELE BY A B'EVII I B THE AVAILABLE RECORDS 'A THE BEST OF OUR EDGE. THERE ARE NO OTHER EXISTING FACILITIES EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS HOWEVER THE LIXY1'RACTDR IS REQUIRED TO TA E PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE EXIS INS TOR N SHOWN IifAEON A. ANY OTHER WHICH IB NOT OF FlE "OFl 01 SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, G LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE AST BY WORK TO B DONE SHALL B CONFIRMS BY IELS MEASURSTACN R TO CONSTRUCTION OF NEW WORK. CONTRACTOR WLL MAKE W 1 EXSLORATO,RY EXCAVATIONS AND L EXISTING MOSARMUN0 RIL II= SUFFICIENTLY AHEAD OF CONSTRUCTION TO PERMI" EVISION, 0 PLANS IF REVISIONS' ARE NECESSARY BECAUSE B ACTUAL LOCATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES, J THE. VPAMYTIS- TO EAITIIMGS`WOHRBI,FAR L'OM111 FACILZ ZEG IL ND SHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH COMPANY REPRESENTATIVES, NOTICE AL ELECTRIC ADS GAS SERVICES WITHIN T IS PROJECT ARE UNBRGROUNO INSTALLATIONS" FOR LOSAIIIN BE EPPJRISNALNCE CABLES L AMR S 0 G 6 EiPYIJG AND TFLEPNOIYE: 1 ASK 422 -113-1 (I. ALERC B THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTTFr IFTC BELL PRIOR TO STARTING WORK NEAR COMPANY CZ L TES AM SHALL COLVEY NATE HIS WORK WITH COMPANY REPRE E ATI'VI- NOTICE: ALL TELEPHONE SERVICE ERRVIDFO WITHIN THIS REJECT BOUNDARY AID, DERGROIlNO DJ5 L ATTERNS OR CC ION OF CABLES AND APPURTE CIS CONTACT PA IFTC BELL, TELEPHONE 1 BOB 133 fRTC ER1 R IT SHALL BE HE RE—CLITY OF THE ISSETHERS '0 CONTACT THE UTILITY AARMIES, ADVICE, LI THAI 0 rMPRODEMISE, M BEAR TOE COST OF REL L fON f 110E, 10 ALL TELEVISION PER ICES WITHIN III MR-1 RE gPAPERSNNO. INBT LATZONS LOCATION 0 A. PPURTYVANCES CO i CT' ERIE ONE A411 it POWER BONDS ANN RUNS SE VINf ETTLEFT LIGRTI SHALI BF SCURRIES ON ,AHSLI BE LOCATELL AW HIN FIR 11N OICA EN RIUNHT -)F- ALW AL. RY CASEMEIV S FFICF L JO 1 1 U. 13 LOSE YCENGEANEER PRIORL TOOMAITIN D NIFF A Y. ✓A! l k- FIELO, 14 REFLECTIVETOAME ON E ALUMINUM WILD 3 FOUL ,IS, NTSMITY YPE 15 PRECO 9TRUCTIOIV MEETINGFAND SHALL BROVIIN7 q <<ASiT 8L'EPT. P HlHNlS OF NOTICE FOR SUCH A MEETINIG. (633 -2110) 16 ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPE'S OVER THREE TO FEET CREA CEO BY WITHILITYOC'FSENCINITASAPPROVIS HYDROSE[II FMIXTUREEEDED EARSIEWAYS 1 YOROSEEDED SLOPES SHALL BE IRRIGATES 'BY WATER TRACK ANTIC THE MIXTURE GERMINATES AND GROWTH 15 ESTABL. HARD, 17 ALL LIMfINAIRES SHAL PROVIDE TRUE 9O' CUTOFF ANG ALLOW NO ESCAPE B LIGHT ABOVE THE HORIZONTAL, 16 PRIVATE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR INFORMAT}CN ONLY. OR REGPONSIBILITYTOFEANYRKINO�H THE DES if IV ORE CONSTRUCTION OF THESE PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS. CIF AID ICABLE) 19 SE ERTTBAGE BLL EWiM1iESELWL "Gr PMITED FRUNRAeR US D SIEAK THROUGH BASE OF CURB. TO GUTTER IN PUBLIC GIREEI, 20 THE DEVELOPER SHALL SE RESPONSIBLE THAT ANY MONUMENT OH BENCH MARK WAYEBUT IS DISTURBS OR DESTROYED BHAI.L BE RE- ESTABLISHES AND REPLACES BY A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER ON A 111,11SEO IANp SLWVEYNP 21 THE DEVELOPER SHALL MARK THE LOCATION I)F' FACH AIWEN LATERAL NB AATER SERVICE BY CHIBLINf 'I'IiE LETTERS ".S" AM '. RESPECTIVELY, 2 INCHES HIGH INTO THE FACE OF THE CURB, IDS A� A OS LOCATION PAINTER ON TTORHE LURE IN A 21 ALL WORK SHALL BE SOM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE .S'TANDARS SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WOODS CDN,STRUCTION (LATEST EDITION), THE SAN DIEGO STANDARD SPECIAL PROVIS , IONS O THE STANDARD SAN BLIND IRaEG ONAL _NOAH C M"" TiEE)NAIVD THE I RIA BY OTB NO MGIONAL STANDARD SRAWALMS !LATEST ELI IOM. 22 THE STRUCTURAL SECTION SHALL B IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY IF ENGIUSTALL AR"S VALUE TEDES IEP BEA REOIIANCE E P LIIlN l RIORY TO CCNSTRlICTION. (PRIVATE) S.FiWER,N07'G^.'u"(CAN.F)IFP SA'VITA,'rR ANi7d,STRICT) 1,POA. DESORIPTIf1ff F i1L11DC1 ISSPECY LF T7C n'.. E. 1, 1 VV04'WT r0scoONE lc, HE TON I Y- - RG ° ) TH L SF� :M CI 15 TE. L OR 'OBI I ' 0 O3E AI E OA I C 0 LA' I II I ( III EL I I VI. S SEC 2S 1 i R 4 N. I N DI BO .. 7 6 Nt E S NU 0 P 6 AND DI I Y 5 OH I?PROLLR1EN (H tnn) SUPPORT DAN CIE ELYELCA I N. F LIO CTI01Y ,ADOPTER 3 THE A,P,N: 11 SE'S' ANO STAND RLD AEFEHEPttk' DAWKINSE 5 DIEGO S -'A U OS CO L) E D DIEGO Y ) L GPO DAHL OHA WI'N6� A'S LA Of TON) AND THE FOLLOWING BITE ADDRESS < - '! - EL CAM 1'NO S.D C N TIFLn C U SPECIAL PROVISIONS: AI ANp YFVAG SCUD CPfVE. SAN DIE C. US ^'I'HYL'1' StP 1. TRCNI; .OTT :.HALL SE P.F �l i.,0 Ca I SCALES, OTHERWTSE PERMITTER nUL'I�1 OU ( LL SCA ON IR r5 D SAN IE.O EGILNAL ITANEARD DRAWINGS NOTED. F 11ITA _ LlC. Pill ANO BEDDING C DITIONS': - " "Y92C2A LEGEND: (A) N.L. PIPE S CHA ✓E A MINIMUM OF 014 INCH IMPI ED ROCK BENEATH THE PIPE. P PEV10 12 INC,HESBMINIMUM 11011 THE IBCLIPIRE SMALL B BE IF I", GRAVEL, CRUSHED AG GAL AL:C- FREE BAPTAINT NG GRAMJI..AR MATERIAL i VYNf A ,adNC - GU }VALENY' OF JO DR BETTS OF PIPE l0 12CINCHES MINPYUM . TIPI iC PNPE SHALLL BF L314M PIPE Wt"IERE PIPEEINVERT GRADES ARE I,..RL GAEA'TE{'YMAY BE U51'D ONL SFTER (O P I' IG 0 I U ALL M LINE SEWERS, EWER SERVICE LATERALS G H BE 'FS AO I IHE PRESENCE OF THE INSPLPTOR III RPFlLSSPRE TEST SHALL BE USGO UNLESS CIHE11 -11 OIREC IG dY IHF NSPECTOR. CO, C ION OF P C 'L 'LFS STALL BE PER SD PARE OLI'fHYC PO11 IINID I O T T BASES 1LPO %F_A MOB G t•IPL':: F ME F POLLELTORASV PTE BASED WITH INSPECFOF��II APPHOVAIE WIT" B -INCH THE C:ONG"RUCTIONSIF 111H SFWBR NA TRALS SHALL BE PER NNAU, N D G ] LRA_3 SHALL NOT OISCMARGE DIRECTLY IN ANHOLES. o MA THE CONSYHUCO L PF CONCRETE ANCHBR wA1..L0 EfALL BE PER ALA,O Na,G -f 0, YPE A. ALL M erNTRIJCTEO vlITN A2 -II'11 ND C MALO VEH. MINIMS THE LITAL L CALL D 1 E 9', 0 SAL 0 R MAINE LA MA pq0A o ACI SHALL. BE ., R_CY AS IL.' PLAN.�, L OR TO ACCEPTANCE OF WORK.O t ALL DESIGN CIANGFS 0 . S,A BF APPROVED SY 1'F IT TCIC E UYNEFA I -TAN IS PUB! Y 119t' ISO E S BE I G E C _ '! IOH 0 E INSIAL AT - s H YI L HN STILI NITIFY D PERA 11 DIVISION B HOURS IN AIVIIII T WORK O A RIAIII R 1 SPECTION OF PCDCFFf 776 OB IN ' V CES BP R MEN' O ION I I E I I "INS f' HT 0 AY, B THE C R D O 0 4N-CY HE DATE A ALL HERF— OPEN WORK FOR A I THE H B N PA OR t E Y IT S LN 'OGF C O C WHICH OD A MAY B BI FD T DERIDE IVE IT R M Y 0/L RI H PERIOD F , I e A TEATS )n JLYX, ILL"Ll N Tl ITS IrLE ATPFOPTIA'I'E BUI TL) 1 II TAPE_. AHFY F I I ] 1,TFTU i0 rTIVAL C rG% It1 11 v 11 IN YNTA✓N OI1EI! MAY N n(H )I AN IISIFS MAINTAIN ANY PUBLIC SEWERS (O "'- IY E SE L v S AAA MAY BE DMAINTA TO THE L AL'CESS EASEMEMS 10 MAINTAIN E FL EN'ENS_ 18. WA STEI✓ATER DISCHARGE PERMITA A PI.UMSINE PER MI T5 AHL IS ALIMEfI PRIOR TO E LION T., NILES, APPROVFC H DATE:.... OWNER'S CERTIFICATE 1, 15 ARICED HA -YE -) i VUSIUW MAr RE -RE CHANGES '10 THESE' PLANS. IT TS III- TEFF0 r "RECTO N L SELL LY+AN'G 5 CLi_RA IO IS LIST IA. VRffN 'III ,TTY ENGINEER DETERMJ.1 ONS ryc IMP OVF ( P w ,nU JE {ABLE FOR THE PROPER Ct1Ml'_E'TI',m OF G E o A F Y IRr C111 1 X 1,11—F-WAY ITHTI III PAYS TES IDS CI C —TRUCTION LIMIT AM 0 P1 SUE SUCH FVLRY AIDS IRRESPECT F GE !NY O'I'HE UG WAR I ASSOCIATED Ir'I THIS PRCJ C IF JNBR 11 CAB LESIL GATE DECLARATION OF RESPONYBIA E CHARGE I NEAP, DFf E I AD TOP ENNINSCH ' 14 AR 'OR THIN. PR0.fEGTa 5'ONSIBI, C GE OVER THE DESIGN F YID IN SEC T OF RD BUSI'NESSF AID l NFEEIAU. 5' .O1, A. THAT THE BS1'CLJ 11 C'INSISTEN 1 (LI'RENT STANDARDS I U'N RI I' IBS 0 SFIiA E 6I I IS 00 'I E REVISOR OH L 5 N !E EVF MC P E INEE O WORK, N PFSTIMP19I . .!S COI: Di. rL OFSTGN. Qp[tL iI0 4 Qrc3 tJN A. qS F2. NO. 29577 07 37 iTG L VIK // M>F OVCA\1Fj APPROVE] DATE: ESTIMATED QUANTITIES CUT 20 ,- FI 1 I. O YE kL E Tl U -0H f T I'- CTANTS TES MAY VA1VOTl JE 10 OFlRiNnA 6c DOli LLL AL D!S'). SOILS ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE SEVEN I RAPID, S" EO RICiElPlICAL ENNINFER IN F STATI 9, MEA I PRIN'. L 001 G B SI ESS IN E III ID 0 YE ! L fS . HIPS111 CEYETIY THAT A SAMFEITNU AND 17111 L CLUD7 BRE POLVALEN7 WTOIN IS SI r WAS D- BY IF OR UNDER RY CF -ON BETAI C F E 'E 9 I�� 0! E C F'D 11 U WITH Hi ' DISPERSEDLY E OF f HC C F C IT, WEST 1- C C OF AFT, , T-111AL, T rv. SCIr A F j . E , v T1 N . 5111 '— C,C T -H A AL L VC CAA`N 2 SANAGCA 9 O. �1�.1 (E191 ) 11 50 -4040 .SPECIAL NOTE: SIR IF 3 -I NAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND APE NSR OVENEACGEPTABLE TU "T CITY ENGINEER, W A C iT0 HE C' WARWICK DRIVE PER 5293 1 HAVE CE 1YOT YWJEENNEDNSTFUC EE AARWICK SRI HALT 31 —STRUTTED 0 EA 3'_I TT 11 B -B. C �F SANM 110N APPROVED .�w.�� By II NRY 2 9 20aY MIAR PLANS PRE11111 TIE SUPERVISION OF I RECOMMENDED APPHOVI ) F AN 111, A B EL, C" O L EAT1 �`17L— B DATE: _... _ L IE __ .. .� — RTx_ N[.9....__. 1YCE PRELO .._ EAP E -2SS3 Yi iJ 3 $ as n D RD E E Aria s ..ID.... Ll y1 3e 9 29� 130 -- 53' LT. 7C 130 -53' LT'. TL° urrES's oTtawtse SawNEUV THE w fK C l ELEVAII1Xd IS - EXISTING BRWND al 53 Lr CALCELATED AS Fp10jIS - TC . G... ELEV. * D.S6 u'P° FINISHED tOP OF CUHB - 120- 53'LTa TC 120 -53' LT, TC 110 — 53' Lt 7r 110- 53'LT:TC E -- 1 120 —C — g ^' „ r --' Exrs L GRADE „�_ $s H- ,.- �' 110 CL 1100 a� A- 120- 33'RT.Tt, 120'- 53'RT.TC �zsY waTE%mE 110- 53'RT.TC' 110 -53'RZ TC , _w N— Yi iJ 3 $ � \'J ..ID.... Ll y1 3e 9 29� �;'� ' o EL n ti Uf V d� d I—T 11 ac 2`a� .� ygvvpp nnRNpp''�9 Rppqqyy 2f9�i.00 6 N'" E ZST +0 AL. wFl Fl CENL EXIST B AC WATEFl LLJE FLAN: E. i AMINO REAL - - x,'z 5 m LUPB DATA LIP£ i, @E RIND (XI.TA TRADTUS LENSiH REM Po S 777, —P, VaP UNUER INE S P 7 7, 7, N OF RFC I - -F , APPRDVFn !MPROVLMENT PLAN EOR. -... H.c E No ogle- _ DATE v..YNF 11 TO E V 1 P C SE WE rYR CT.11 OF S y1 3e 9 29� � _A 2]Sf00 EL n d� d I—T 11 ac 2`a� .� ygvvpp nnRNpp''�9 Rppqqyy 2f9�i.00 6 N'" E ZST +0 AL. wFl Fl CENL EXIST B AC WATEFl LLJE FLAN: E. i AMINO REAL - - x,'z 5 m LUPB DATA LIP£ i, @E RIND (XI.TA TRADTUS LENSiH REM Po S 777, —P, VaP UNUER INE S P 7 7, 7, N OF RFC I - -F , APPRDVFn !MPROVLMENT PLAN EOR. -... H.c E No ogle- _ DATE v..YNF 11 TO E V GRADING NOTES NOTIFICATIONS 1. ORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE ITH THESE PLANS. ALL THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS 1, THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPERS CONSTRUCTION. THE DESIGN CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS OF THE CITY OFENCINITAB AND THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAW SE. ANY CHANGES OR REVISIONS HEBHFROM AND STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTAINED BY SEARCH OF AIVAILABLE RECORDS. TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE SHALL BE APPROVED BY HE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR t0 REDDEST FOR INSPECTION. HERE ARE NO EXISTING UTILITIES EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, HOWEVER: G. THE SOILS REPORT TITLED "GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO T KE DUE PRECAUTIONARY ALZHEIMEPS CAPE FACILITY EL CAMINO REAL AND ENNIS SLID OR. ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA'S DATED OCTOBER 30,1998 AND E MEASURES TO PROTECT ANY E %ISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES LOCATED AT THE SITE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S LETTER TIT, LED " GEOTECHNICAL UP DATE FOR THE GPAUER FOUNbATION FOP EDUCATION', DATED JULY f3. 2009 PREPARED iORK RESPONSIBILIY 0 CONTACT HE FOLLOWING OWNER S OF SAID UTILITIES OP PRIOR 0 ANY EXCAVATION. FOP BY: BLADDER ENGINEERING SHALL BE IINSIOERED AS A PART OF THIS GRADING PLAN. GRADING BE GONE IN OTRUCTURES VERIFICATION ND LOOCATIDN Of UTILITIES AND NGT IFICATI ON OF COMMENCEMENt OF WORK: ALL SHALL ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS A. SPECIFICATIONS A. SEWERS - CS. (760) 633 -2770 CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT AND LETTER. 3, APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF B. GAS 6 ELECTRIC -SOG&E (BOG) 422 -A133 SIZES. LOLAT ION AND TYPE OF DRAINAGE FALILI TIES. NOR OF IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN STREET RIGHT -OF -WAYS. SEPARATE C. WATER - OMWD (>60)153 -64fi6 APPROVALS AND PERMITS FOR THESE SHALL BE BEODOIED IN CONJUNCTION WITH IMPROVEMENT PLANS. 0. TELEPHONE - PAC -BELL (8001 489 -3441 4. PERMISSION SHALL BE OBTAINED FOR ANY OFF -SITE WRITTEN E. CABLE TV - (8) 422 -4133 00 GRADING. F. UNOENGRDUN' SERVICE ALERT -(800) 422 -4133 E. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE AN' NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS ISOUIPED TO PROTECT ADJACENT ROPER TIES DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. 2.' CONTRACTOR STALL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 48 HOURS PRIOR 0 BEGINNING ANY WORK UK THIS PROJEC, . YTHING DAMAGED OR IS ...IS SHALL BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED TO CONDITION EXISTING PRIOR TO GRADING. PHONE: (760) 633 -2770. G. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE THAI ANY MONUMENT OR DISTURBED G. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE 24 HOURS NOTICE ON CALLS OR INSPECTION. PHONE: (160) 633 -2110. ALL WORK PERFORMED BENCH MARK WHICH IS OR DESTROYED SHALL BE PE- ESTABLISHED AND REPLACED BYA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER ITE'VI BE IT OF INSPECTION WILL BE SUBJECT TO REJECTION AND REMOVAL. OR A LICENSED LAND SUGE'AOR. - HE CONTRACTOR SHALL HER GO. CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN ALL SOILS ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE SAFETY DEVICES. INCLUDING SHORING. AND SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING i0 ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS AND - I, BPETT L DER..N, A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER IN HE STATE OF CAL IFOPNIA PRINCIPALLY DOING BUSINESS IN THE FIELD OF PPLIED SOIL REGULATIONS. MUNITIONS CERTIFY SITELWAS BASESBYDME OF DEEP MY M B. MILE THE ANSTRICTURENFORPHUMANNOCCUPANCY SHALLLNOT EIS COPYCOF THEESOILS REPORTTCOMPILEO FROM THIS STU..0 W1THMHyETE CONDUCTED BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 5:30 P.M. ANO 7:30 A.M. NOR ON SATURDAYS. SUNDAYS AND CITY RECOGNIZED HOLIDAYS, RECOMMENDATIONS, HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENIGENREVIEWEDNGH WITH GRPLATE LETTER DATED (N/A)THFURTHERMORE, I RECOMMENCAT G. NO GRADING OPERATNS SHALL COMMENCE UNTIL A PREGRAGING IONS INCLUDED IN THE SOILS REPORT FOP THIS PROJECT HAVE MEETING HAS BEEN HELD ONSITE WITH THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE PRESENT: CITY INSPECTOR. CIVIL ENGINEER. SOILS ENGINEER, BEEN INCORPORATED IN HE CRAIG NO PLANS AND SPECIFILAT IONS. , GRADING CONTRACTOR AND PFRMITTEE, THE EORADE MEETING SHALL BE SCHEDULED WITH HE CITY AT LEAST B OURS IN ENWRONMENTAL NOTES: ADVANCE By CALLING (760) 633 27,0. 10. PRIOR TO HAULING DIRT OR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TO ANY INDBABILITY AND OT HEP DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVEOAFTER EACH INFALL. PROPOSE. CONSTRUCTION SITE WITHIN THIS PROJECT THE DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT TO AN O RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE (EXCLUDING AND EXISTING MAN MADE SLOPES). CITY ENGINEER FOR THE PROPOSED HAUL ROUTE. HE DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CONDITIONS AND PEOUIREMENTS THE SIGNED: RETT L. ANGER Ol CITY ENGINEER MAY IMPOSE WITH REGARDS t0 THE HAULING OPERATION. RLE NO. 45389 11. UPON FINAL COMPLETION OF THE WORK ORDER THE GRADING E %P, DATE: 9/30/2002 PERMIT BUT PRIOR TO FINAL GRADING APPROVAL ANG /OP FINAL RELEASE OF SECURITY, AN AS- GRADED CERTIFICATION SHALL BE PROVIDED STATING: THE GRADING UNDER PERMIT NO. 7065 -G DECLARATION OFRESPONSISLECHARGE HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE W11 THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN OR S SHOWN ON T HE DECLARE THAT 'ED T E ENGINEER 0 ORK OR THIS PROJECT, HAT I HAVE EXERCISED RPONSIBLE CHARGE OVER THE DESIGN OF THE HE ATTACHE' S- GRADED PLAN'. THIS STiTEMENT SHALL BE fOLLOWED BY THE GATE 0 SIGNATURE OF HE CIVIL ENGINEER WHO CERTIFIES SUCH GRADING OPERATION. pROJECp AS DEFITED IN SECTION 6>ED OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE, NO THAT HE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS. 12, ALL GRADING SHALL BE OBSERVED AND ESTED BY QUALIFIED I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHECK KNIT DRAWINGS A D SPECIFICATIONS BY E CITY OF ENCINITAS IS CONFINED TO A REVIEW ONLY AND GOES NOT SOILS ENGINEER OR UNDER HIS DIP.ECTTON. SHALL IS AMU ANO LEST THE EXCAVATION PLACEMENT T' COMPPACTION OF FILLS RELIEVE E, ENGINEER OF WORK, OF MY RESPONSIBILITIES OR PROJECT BESIBM AND BACKFILLS AND COMPACTION OF TRENCHES. HE SHALL REPORTS REOUI RED AND WILL DETERMINE THE EESIOH SUBMIT SOILS AS SUITABILITY OF ANY FILL MATERIAL PON COMPLETION OF ppOF 4 GPAOINO OPERATIONS HE SHALL STATE THAT OBSERVATIONS AND I ESTS WERE ApE BY HIM OR UNDER IIS SUPERVISION 0 THAT IN IS OPINION ALL EMBANKMENTS D E%CAVAT IONS WERE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING PLANS AND THAT ALL EMBANKMENTS AND E%CAVAT IONS N0. 295,7 Exp. 03/31/03 v ARE SUITABLE FOR THEIR INTENDED USE. /J �//'?^'A -mod 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPERLY GRADE ALL EXCAVATED SURFACES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AND PREVENT PONOIN6 BY: _, DATE 1T aI RAYNE A q CIVIL OF TER HE SHALL CONTROL SURFACE WATER ANp AVOID DAMAGE TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES ON TO FINISHED WORK ON THE .C, E. 295„ 0.c CALIF SITE AND SHALL TAKE REMEDIAL MEASURES TO PREVENT EROSION OF FRESHLY GRADED AREAS UNTIL SO" TIME AS PERMANENT OR IMAGE AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. OWNERS CERTIFICATE: 34. ALL AREAL TO BE FILLED SHALL BE PREPARED TO BE FILLED ANO I ERE.1 CERTIFY THAT REGISTEERED SOILS ENGINEER ON FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD SPECIPC CAIIONS. ALL VEGETABLE MATTER INS OBJECTIONABLE W GEOLOGIST HAS BEEN OR ILL BE ETA INEI TO BUPERV?SE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR FROM THE SURFACE UPON WHICH THE FILL IS TO BE PLACE,. LOOSE FILL OVER ALL GRADING ACTIVITY AND ADVISE ON ONE COMPACTION AND S ABILITY OF THE SITE. AND ALLUVIAL SOILS SHALL BE REMOVES TO SUITABLE FIRM NATURAL GROUND HE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE SCAPIFI ED TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES AND THEN COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90 PERCENT IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO / h ((C/ ART GPAUER PLACE. SPREW'. W TER O COMPACT HE FILL IN STRICT ACCORDANCE ITH SPEC IF ICATION6. GRADER FOUNGIIION FOR EDUCATION DATE 2210 ENCINITAS BLVD 15. CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE CUT AND TRIMMED 0 INISH ENCINITAG,CA 92024 GRACE TO PRODUCE SMOOTH SURFACES ANO UNIFORM CROSS SECTIONS THE SLOPES OF EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENTS SHALL BE SHAPED. PLANTED .AND TRIMMED AS DIRECTED BT'. THE ENGINEER OF WORK ANC LEFT IN A NEAT AND ORDERLY CONDITION ALL STONES ROOTS AND OTHER WASTE MATTED NO BUILDING PERMITS WILL EROSION CONTROL 400 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EASTERLY 498 FEET OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF 1, IN CASE EMERGENCY WORK IS REOUI RED. CONTACT i& ittE F" Mfx XAiFP G1£A�1245 tEA THE N E. 1/4 OF THE S E 1/4; AND TTE N. 1/4 OF iNE S.E. OF THE TONY GHIO AT (209) 454 JJ44. - Sm GL6. Nm 5'FPE£IDaAU I/4 N.E. 114 OF HE S.E. 1/4 SEC. 23 T. 13 S R. 4 W. 2. EQUIPMENT AND WORKERS FOR EMERGENCY ORK SHALL BE MACE . .0.... A.P.N.: 262 -160 -AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING THE RAINY SEASON. ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS SHALL BE STOCKPILED ON SITE AT tt�� SITEADDRESS SOUTHWESCORNER OF EL GAMING CONVENIENT LOCATIONS r0 FACILITATE RAPID CONSTRUCTION OF TEPORARYDEVICES WHEN RAIN IS IMMINENT. NiN 3 SI(F51 _15GTEE0 11'm NEAL AND TENNIS CLUB DRIVE. 3. DEVICES SHOWNN ON PLANS STALL NOT BE MOVED OR MODIFIED E, t� - � /'pF5gN0 OV/-R 4" PERMITTEE GPAUER FOUNDATION FOP EDUCATION 2210 ENGINE TAS GLVDWITHOUT THE PPROVAL Of HE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR. fff1942 � p G/ ENCINITAS.CA 92024 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES 4 TO WORKING GROSS O THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER ') OWNEq GPAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION 2210 ENCINITAS BLVD. AFTER EACH RUN OFF PRO.UCING RAINFALL. DETAIL A: ENCINITAS,CA 92024 5, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED By THE CITY ENGINEER DUE O TYPE "F"CATCH BASIN FOR OVERFLOW ESTIMATED QUANTITIES UNCOMPLETED GRADING OPERATION OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAV API6E. NOT TO SCALE f CUT 7900 CV w " U. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE III SHALL TAKE __ FILL 1900 CY x NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT PUBLIC TRESPASS ONTO AREAS WHEN IMPOUNDED WATERS CREATE A HAZARDOUS CONDITION. "�, :''S8iLE 4f GNr SASm tASy4 �W:S PJN '\ IMPDPT /EXPORT 0 CY K 7. ALL IN OSION CONTROL MEASURES PROVIDED PER THE APPROVED ...1pM iGt32.0J� & TT I7 GRADING PLAN SHALL BE INCORPORATED HEREON. B AWAY - K XYbII'aaMm'E'P Ll"E FlliEH x EARTHWORK DUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATED FOR PERMIT PURPOSES FgOMETHERFALEAOCUSCOPEEATRTHECCONCLUSIOHROFUEACHRWORK DAY. Maki@ SYSSE �fd)7?1� -8419 - - EMS (IfYMde19 Z4.18aPPA' ., V<kA QUANTITIESLMAVAVARY DUE TO SHRINKAGE OR SWELLCFpCTORS) . 9, ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHOWN SHALL BE IN PLACE - ENWRONMENTAL NOTES: THE ENO OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE FIVE (5) DAV PAIN FORECAST EXCEED$ .PTY PERCENT (4qp) SILT I. THE STEEPEST E %ISTING SLOPE IN THE GRADED AREA IS 26%. INDBABILITY AND OT HEP DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVEOAFTER EACH INFALL. \ - SB N RIFMiW e PM4' B1� r (EXCLUDING AND EXISTING MAN MADE SLOPES). 10. SHOULD GERMINATION OF "A ..ESLOP SLOPES FAIL TO ) PRIOR EFFECTIVE COVERAGE OF GNAOEO SLOPES (90% COVERAGE) Y F.K - 2. THE MAXIMUM VERTICAL DEPTH OF CUT IS 12.2 FEET AND THE MAXIMUM VERTICAL HEIGHT OF FILL 13.2 FEET. TO NOVEMBER 15. THE SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH PUNCHED STRAW INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE SECTION 35,023 ALFA IE Rk1Z151 ,' U. AVERAGE DEPTH = VOLUME OF CUT (C.F.1 213300 IF A,1 OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL HANDBOOK OF THE STATE NDSO OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION. DETAIL B: Of CUT AREA OF CUT (S.F.) 100521 IF NOT TO SCALE � TO SCALE B.) AVERAGE DEPTH - OLUME OF FILL (L.F.) 213300 CF m 2.06' OF FILL AREA OF FILL (9.F.) 37971 SF TI 400 % 2% FG -. T " -..� �- PET WALLS -TM \ �- (TYP) " G" TYPE -- .._.PROPOSED ,-IN RG...., IF G CURB OUT 1 FG -- _IF SECTION A-A NOT TO SCALE I I x MTE GUi -LfF XALL _ BE WrSILE CF VLSIXEr£ _ SA. i0 H£VEM WiEP FRTN mummc ALGG TllT,CN IXlISII.E LF PIPE, -- .£' PVC' SOPIRIF XtrN--- - - - - -. E% CONLENTRA7E To E%PG1E0 w«+=*•- 0 -7 RIUVAYE LN d1A f F6R WnU RR eo irny. T -o A OF I WR4 5' C "R &g < MTncT: BORDER PR4 > +<YS RP lSSWSGe-B3VN = -- 501.11 LF 20.25 IF 12 EA 3 EA iG+.GGGnfr INS 2iEFOeKRBea pyc SH4[t Yff T"ERAf#ACY .�\ ovERlFi RA ffTArt A wN %'cva. N x 4 °ac. 1250 FG / 'Ek ) -1 P VTSlAEAE ..... 1.65 LF 1650 SF - 0 iN DI 126. BOO YS RO ��:G I _ / LA& mAm i0 RR`LIPATEO 1 EA XUL S!B(pAIN- CWfA Acei' 9'/e a /ohh aoT Ov PIPE x 630 OF 1 EA ,SA4A0 ,wiM AW✓A1 xjtS TALL DIASS NAZS CN - \ _ j ❑ wrra aro slcss a- easm j M�11.L�PE6 5 s ro J 4xFER'WAiO PER" DTAm G F'BgSIN -El / - t I1LLE5 LN L-0Rgp / 112' i0 2' EIXE F C 112 "'GRASS XfWCEn lXRHIN Whip gl 11DM 0 4105 To CONS 5T OF i 9 N 1 FINE Fou pulNp 6RASIFY. SECTION &B: DETENTION BASIN E OF THE FEU.PUIN4 6RM1ES. SECTION B-B: DETENT70N BASIN -Aq_4K]I C% (Bu l�-) T +�OF A +�'i\ TjY/jQifr -B ,+5 ,n (4i fan,.A I NOT TO SCALE - 5HPA PIIc4T. (R,k Nall 5-11? DR DIWER CALIFP1NUSN*FUNe SPECIES CAPABLE OR W ItgSTAN.,44 FREWENf INUNB 4, WOWTOBEDONE S...R.'.0. SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS ITEM S. D.R.S. D.M SYMBOL QUANTITY PROJECT BOUNDARY EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CUT /FILL LINE PROPOSED CONTOURS PROPOSE' SPOT ELEVATIONS PROPOSED TYPE "C" PCC BROW DITCH PROPOSED 2:1 FILL SLOPE PROPOSE' 2:1 CUT SLOPE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SHALE (1% MINI PROPOSED SIDEWALK UNOEPORAIN PIPE PROPOSE' 6" PVC PROPOSED 8" PVC PROPOSED 12" PVC PROPOSEOIS" PVC PROPOSED 12'x12" AREA DRAIN PROPOSED TYPE "F" CATCH BASIN PROPOSED RIP RAP ENERGY DISSIPAIGR PROPOSED 6 CURB PROP11E1 1 CURB 6 GUTTER PROPOSE. RETAINING WALL, PROPOSED 36" PVC STANDPIPE 0.4-1 M110 PRPSECT IANDSUPE AR(NITECT P`9 ALTEMAINES. EXPOSED OR EXCAVATION OR EMBANKMENT SLOPES WHICH ARE 11556149 FQR%(/ /5S /7E AXIS LIABLE TO BEGONE LOOSENED SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED UATIL PV /OENGE OP LEGAL IEG -- 1% MIN IPER PLAN1 - �P 20% MR OF HE TOE ANO TOP OF ALL SLOPES SHALL BE ROUNDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GRADING ORDINANCE. 16.. ALL TREES, BRUSH. GRASS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL ACLE5$ OVEN TENNIS %LUG PRORIE 1 SHALL BE COLLECTED. POLED OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF OFFS THE SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR 50 AS TO LEAVE THE AREAS THAT DRIVE 11..45 BEEN SUC.NIMEO AVE BEEN CLEARED WITH A NEAT AND FINISHED APPEARANCE DRAINAGE SWALE DETAIL (TYPICAL) EPEE FROM UNSIGHTLY DEBRIS. APPROVAL OF LOCATION OF 7o THE CITY ENGINEE1ri/✓G DEBRIS FILL SHALL BE SECURED FROM THE SOILS ENGINEER AND NOT TO SCALE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE DISPOSAL IF ANY SUCH MATERIAL. vapWIA.'TMEA/T LANDSCAPING 1. SLOPES 'HALL BE PLANTED AND IRRIGATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS iPPPOVED BY THE CIT Y ENGINEER. PLANS SHALL CONFM TO HE CITY OF. ENCINITAS GP AGING ORDINANCE AND ALL ADOPTED LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION STANDARDS. 2. FINISH GRADING AND. PLANTING SHALL BE ALLOMPLISHEO ON ALL SLOPES PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1 OR IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF ANY SLOPES GRADED BETWEEN OCTOBER 1 AND APRIL 15. BAPPROVED � n� I APP VEJiB\ 0_� ^- _ SAWS A. DATE: DATE: q&OL11/ -PCC ... R OHOE - TENNIS CLUB D STRIPE (TYP) rql ,j w"', AC23IB.E _ �SZNf1E WHITE. STRIPE &(T P) 'TRIPE (TYP) II ^�.,% STANDARD LL- LHAN_NANACCE81uBLE , PARIOND SPACE PAgMN DPACE I n TIE SURFACE STRIPING DETAIL (TYPICAL) \ LCO TED A d INTERIOR ENO OF THE SPACE J 7M/M OF EN IN ABOVE FINISHED GRADE GO A „? R DN A WALL A MINIMUM OF 36 IN ABOVE FINISH fRKINIx SPACE ON A 3 FORT FAINTED SQUARE, 9F S Y MANCHESTER PNE VICINITY MAP NOT TL1 H m ,�.. .� Uv. REVIEWED PLANS PREPARE, UNDER THE SUPERVISION OP ^RECOMMENDED APPROVE [ l /J �,j' GRADING PLAN FOR: Ar _. REALTMEOIANK U. 11 SEDIMEN 'I BASININO pA E 7�2TT l BY BYOvil`� /•(l_ - � P.C.E. NO $9877 „ -,_ B p GRAUER FOUNDATIONFOR EDUCATION 7065 -G�...._ WW YNa E PASCD o4rE SI _,J. DATE: -1 ��EI Rv ", eR eT M Prcr,R BV: DATE EXP 3-3LQ3. 400 0 ~ __ 547 IF I I I I D-27 -- - - - - -- 69.78 LF 48.63 LF IF w«+=*•- 0 -7 •m•s ❑O = -- 501.11 LF 20.25 IF 12 EA 3 EA TTYPE G ® 5 CY 13311,11 LI G 2 �dl C ..... 1.65 LF 1650 SF V - Q 1 EA S - ❑ 630 OF 1 EA ❑ 1 EA 2600 BE Y MANCHESTER PNE VICINITY MAP NOT TL1 H m ,�.. .� Uv. REVIEWED PLANS PREPARE, UNDER THE SUPERVISION OP ^RECOMMENDED APPROVE [ l /J �,j' GRADING PLAN FOR: Ar _. REALTMEOIANK U. 11 SEDIMEN 'I BASININO pA E 7�2TT l BY BYOvil`� /•(l_ - � P.C.E. NO $9877 „ -,_ B p GRAUER FOUNDATIONFOR EDUCATION 7065 -G�...._ WW YNa E PASCD o4rE SI _,J. DATE: -1 ��EI Rv ", eR eT M Prcr,R BV: DATE EXP 3-3LQ3. �... Z GRAPHIC SCALE SO Eo PC \- �' EXISTING 20 PRIVATE �Y apAO AIN PUBLIC -. UTILITY EASENENT PER SOC 74 000038 J- 1 1 REC JAN 21914 T = BIOLOGICAL ORENSPAGE _ EASENEC . PER 000. J I 1413 60 E6E A I CORRIDOR BROW Ul- PER REL pOL IT SDRGO 0-16 _- �\ 1 631L \ \ 0 91C 4 /f 362 TO r139 e1 36a iE0 c�.g�� M' ro4 nao iaew Bp6 ,�' ..If6lA X12 X 2 1 `4s 108.4 1N . N aE aiW TO��n'OIi[t71 3J IE �139D6 rcP ensnxlx�21 avauTS` ?aa>v `-1 � � u�rsA l V`Y/ A� �I Also h I & _ (133 21 !9x.60 TW�sr -13F2t F%6N1134dirrt IE t.2 ,,..:,4'- v"v- ""v' -v 3 PAPALLft2 b pax w. ✓; W �� HEMAflK3 -4 IDroe W" 2H.W 43.93'. 35.8' 6' i1W£ E" CIAB 6" iME Ti "GYbE 3 61 U33'' 1591 / rx 1<sa3_ aY 41 J 1 I, 1 f#0 FL.. @14�ifil4.g8lAii 8.T 955 _6_'iYPE b'Gk8 6 TYPE E'f4E s 1�I IE IN -- ypi5 y 98 J A Y � G� M1$tlHd41E ( _ k3915I z _ - -� i5 "21'15' U E ROPOSEO 0-2 PER GITY O, .ENL. PhMSE2DEV,ANEA ='M19B8 1S8 PA..a iF 1663] i INI'i12641 6 7W IS(LL !�P p� ,PAD RB.'bSL W TER U8 OMO OX'G E( 2M '. W 187:84 26 W4�dL.F1 y�ffiI-0t ,1 H it 46l 1 E EW f33,H i3i-I6 I6 1 tEmalo-e sW iJ y y Q� Ei 0ff0 NA A L. E4OSENF FFA pAtl &.G EYT'22 ae. m it;> : + = an �3asrg ... R , lroa o Iw.ss�+lY,,. ,PEP FfRE l,vauNr I P � ! �.. xuhs w � ` PEn a4�o 4� ex! zm -xi .y A2T9 TO $ 11 12 @ E CE OF =CIWB 11626 'Y @ FACE aF CURB- 16 34 i � (1.4 TRIPLE 0- 2'CURB WREi _ _. I� EXISTING B PVC SEWER 9 ti PEOPTC�IgY L DWG. 1065 -I PER COUNTY OF SAN DIEGOv N ONG 3608 -1 6 3960 -1. EXISTING 10" AL NAIS LYfE Q WV/ � 1 AY A \� r 1137 41 A ORMEMA101 r dENGTH �� HEMAflK3 I IDroe W" 2H.W 43.93'. 35.8' 6' i1W£ E" CIAB 6" iME Ti "GYbE 3 61 U33'' 1 E, GN 4 5 . -.. _lb9YI.1 1" 2x1?, NARO GRAIN 1'330 d 8.T 955 _6_'iYPE b'Gk8 6 TYPE E'f4E 6 y ELIT � ` 6 TYPE E "0.Y8 _ - -� i5 "21'15' U E ROPOSEO 0-2 PER GITY O, .ENL. CURB 6 GUTTER C Y G OWG 106$ I CE B ]. PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION DFI RECOMMENDED APPROVED OA E:- ....._ B - ._._..... E : -__ _ ...._._ R E _2a5.7= GATE:__ WAYNE PASCO E P._3; 31-03 N0. A ORMEMA101 HMlU& dENGTH �� HEMAflK3 1 IDroe W" 2H.W 43.93'. 35.8' 6' i1W£ E" CIAB 6" iME Ti "GYbE 3 61 U33'' 4 5 . -.. _lb9YI.1 1" _..._ 1080 8.T 955 _6_'iYPE b'Gk8 6 TYPE E'f4E 6 31-. 313621" ELIT 1655 6 TYPE E "0.Y8 7 i5 "21'15' S.W 655 6 TYPE E'G%0 B 4 N992038'W $b°39'38'W 15.0 4259 6 "AS E' GYYO 6" TYPE "G "UP9 10 S&9'A3J'E 12.50 6 TYff E'GYAS 11 12 W W W ° 930'.,630% 250 3.93 051 6 tYPE 5' CUB FT. 9 "CIAB 13 96 W . I 250 393 6 TYPE I m 14 19 9,9W.El SW'39'30'k 69.50 SY PYB 6 TYPE E" fEfB I6 17 49'�ro W£ WWW" 258 1290 393 6' TYPE 'G'QAB 6 SPE E"GYVE 1B 19 .SW'39'33N 9)7W 18 - 3.93 6 TYPE I-- 6 TYPE E' CGIB 20 21 589`9COE NM'3933'E 1250 15.W 6 TYPE G "Ufk? 6 YPE 'G" CAB 22 23 NW 23 W N .. W 250 12.48 393 fi TYPE E" E 6 YPE E" GAS _ 24 lA0'A30E 2105 6 I ff E" Mfi 25 % 12-111' N13ro G4£ ]6.W 16.51 IWW 6 TYPE E GAS 6 ilW£ N- I 28 W 33'12' 582191E 2B.W 11432 861 6 TYPE '6'M 6 YPE V- CUE 29 30 B3ro521" ..413£ 21.00 29.W 15.10 6tYPE E`LAB 6 RYE 31 13 d>E WW 6 Tff E "OSV 32 33 tO31613£ N991341"1 6410 SOW 6 TYPE D m 6 SPE E "LYYB 39 35 MG 4613£ 965,331 5A0 12.11 8.46 6 Iff 'G' CIbB 6 !Yff E - fl BUFIEP 36 ]02'19 tdW Iff 'G CAB 6 GU(iEfl 37 38 45,41" WIN 'x 1PW 795 34 fi I ff G CAB 6 NPOP iYff E 6YA8 S GrtiER 39 31 YW" IO.W 655 T ff E" fiL6H 6 OUT(EA ,0 41 40'846" 8'2216' 51AO 2.50 7,6r 3816 6 !Yff L GYAB G'r. PAE SCAB 6 Call TEA 42 43 N43'5425W 22'02 1" VW 12.8 25.77 6 TYPE E LAB 6 IXliifR 6 IRS G" M 6 WTGP 44 45 7, 66tN BI'.E 1246- EGf86C'1. TWE G IXW IOURS' d6 2'273) 5210 223 i G, ONE 6 GUl(ER 17 dH. 872215 )319 d9W 250 3,61 12:8 TYK fi ❑0.036UI3EH 6 RFE L -B G(ffTEA 49 3 13D7 71 67.W 3.76 - 117. " 6 iY(E ro CAN 8 M. . P' ' 5f 8 64:5 W tlO' 250 12.50 393 6' ff CYYB S 6UiiBi 6 YPE E' GAS 6 .11HA 8 51 HI3v- 12'2194' IWW 0.31 21,75 6 TYPE E 61A3 6 p?TEA 6 NGE E Wff d CLREA 8 .OSS0E 1435 6 l E" LYAB S GJiiFA 8 51 93 Yp W' f99'V 30YV 250 393 r 128 rff 'O" pNB. 6 TYPE E"OAE 4 59 xxJ'39W£ f A'W 2Y.W 13W 6" iWE C' - 6" iYff 5" CINRI 60 61 im 1W W W' Op 200 6}B 13W 6" lYFE E" CLIdJ 6 "TYPE 'G" W8 62 9W'H30'x MEND 6" TYPE am am E" 63 NE928901Y 250 2'. 12.50' 393' 6' TYPE E' BIAS 6 "lYFE '6 "OR0 65 SW'3930N 2.12' 6" TYPE E" (LW 8 67 9J'WW' N9920'30W 2-4 3.93' I28' 6 lYPE E "GUS B PYff E" 0A0 68 E9 W029WW 56.9 roH'4p£ 102. IO5.31 6' TYPE E" Od8 6" TYPE °O" CU9B JO 11 93 W W" AW 6 }2P£ 2B.W 13.8 1250 6 FE E` CGPB 6 C{)iiER 6' YPE 'G" LLYB 6 WiiER 72 WtlI W' 2800 1398 6" Yff G "CAB 6 GUi'iER F tit C' ', No. 29577 � 6T CIVl� l s>W. OF CAt1P� ;ITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENI:ORAWING : i RAGING PLAN FGR: GRAVER FOUNDATIONFOR EDUCATION 7065 -G Z GRAPHIC SCALE f " =30' 0 3C 60 RC ti y t � I I _ 1 J QSTALL GRAVEL BAGS �'2' GS'HIGWT".) INSTALL i HYDROSEED (TYR) I ` 11,41, 01 AF- Y . �s'`� O g r, ae. TA A IfyB rA STABILIZED WSTRU CFONf ° =rd z a ( �+ a, o 5 Tm A v, i i N TWO LAYERS OF GRAVEL BAGS > rt ��OFASSPN4l RU OFF WITH ENDS OVERLAPPEO C" O REAL E 'A F pAP BerwEEN BAGS DETAIL: GRAVEL BAGS CTS AS SPILLWAY .. Exp. 03/31/03 '� {z d st CIVR S)� OF GAUF� REEEBENCE RATE BENCHMARK SCALE SPECIAL DISTRICT APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN DRAWING N0.' REVISIONS APPROVER GATE S PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF Ill A l PRDV�� oSION CONTROL PLAN F R. R 0' All = - 30' .. DATE z ° n y B"., / —y /T GRAUER FOUNDATTONFOR EDUCAITON 7065 —G Na.�,9,5L GATE vERncAt__..._ w NE PASCO.g1- 7 -41.ej o TE E %P. 11 -03 WORN PROJECT N0. O1 -016 MUPM00 /CRP(EIA SHEET 3 OF PE )B9 G E PERMITTED. DRAINAGE SHALL E TRANSMITTED UNDER SIDEWALK. THROWN FACE O CUR, TO GUTTER M RELIC STREET. THE XVROOB SHALL E RESPONSIBLE THAT aNY MONAENT OR SEWN MAFM( NHICN IS OISTLRED CR XSTROYEO SHALL E RE {STABLISHED ANp FERACED BY A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER OR A LICENSED LAND SR EYO. 21 THE DEVELOPER SHALL M THE LOCATION O EACH SEDER LATERAL AO WATER SERVICE BY CHISELING THE LETTERS S" ANON `N'. RESPECTIVELY. 2 INCHES HIGH INTO THE FACE O THE IN .r r GENERAL NOTES WATER NOTES PUVENK41N WNMAPAL WATER DISTRICT) SEWER NOTES(CARDIFF.SANITATKIN DISTRICT) `G' I A PERMIT SHALL SE OB TAINED FROM THE CITY D ENCINITAS ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR ANY WRK WITHIN THE 1. WATER NXKS SHALL E CONSTRUCTED IN ACCOROAM£ WITH ALL WORN SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD ALL WORK SHALL BE 21 ALL WORK SHALL E DOE IN ACCO UMCE WITH THE STANDARD STREET RJOY'O-WAY. THE DETAILS AM MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED IAN THE C-IVEN CAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, (LATEST EDITION). THE SAN THE SAN DIEGO STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISIONS TO THE TEST MO SPECIAL THE AND 2 THE STRUCTURAL SECTION SHALL SE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY O ENCINITAS NAPo:IC MN STANDARDS. CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAINS AND FACILITIES AT. MARCH 1997 WITH EVISIOS. LYdVTRACTOB SHALL HAVE A CURRENT .COPY FOR PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION, BY THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE), THE SHAD DIEGO F1' VALUE TRESS STALL SE REWIRED PRIOR TO COVSTM)CTICN. (PUBLIC) O THE STANDARD SECIFICATIONS ON THE . B SITE AT ALL TIMES REGIONAL STANARO DRAWINGS (LATEST EDITION) AND THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL PROVISIONS: - . INSTAL A. W HIGH SODIUM SONNET LIGHT 3 AR PA - O THESE IMROVEMM RAMS AS SOWN ORES HOT 2. THE SISMTSSION AND REVIEW O ALL SUBMITTALS (SHOP O44WINGS SIX -I AS )EIXIIREO BY TE STANDARD f. TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE PEP SORSO NU.S -A UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. OSTIRE APPROVAL O AN CONSTMIION OUTSIDE RE %DECT BDUADARY. SPEATIOS ARED BE ACCOMPSXD PRIOR TO THE PE- COSTPo ION NESTING WSRi TFE OISIRICT5 INSPECT0.9. 2 RIPE AND BEDDING CONDITIONS: (A) ALL PIPE SHALL HAVE 4" MINIMUM OF 314 INCH CRUSHED 22 THE STRUCTUAAL SECTION SHALL E IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY O EWINITAS STANNEGG AND AS APPROVED BY THE CITY 4 ALL LPUERGROAU UTILITIES WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT -O -WAY SHALL E COSTRUCTED, COAECTEC AID TESTED PAIR TO 3, NO NOM( MAY BEGIN OR PROCEED WITHOUT DIRECTION O DISTRICTS INSPECTOR. INSPECTORS SCHEDULING -I BE 24 -48 ROCK BENEATH THE PIPE., COSTF'UCT1)N O EML CYBB CROSS .TIER AN3 PAVING. iplBS IN ADVANCE O WORK. (B) V C.P. M A. G. TRUSS PIPE BEGGING FROM BOTTOM OF PIPE A f2 INCHES MINIMUM ABE THE PIPE SHALL BE SANG, 5 THE EXISIEME AND LOCATION OF EXISTING IRBPA G FACILITIES SAMV ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTALNEO BY A SEARCH 4. WHERE ELEVATIONS N GRABS ARE HOT SHOWN ON THE WATER MAIN FEFAE O' O PIPE P-DS IS A9 -UW`ES BELOW GRAVEL N LOUSED AGGREGATE. NATIVE FREE - GRAINING G. IM MATERIAL HAVING A SAND EQUIVALENT OF 30 OR BETTER. O THE AVAILABLE BECOME TO THE BEST O OUR KN SOGE. TFERE CEMERIE O FINISH FdUD O STREET. (C) P. V. C, AND A. B. S. SOLID WdLL PIPE REDOING FROM BOTTOM G ARE NO OTHER EXIST FACILITIES EXCEPT dS SHOWN DV i T T T T TREE PLANS. iphEVER THE CYRJ AAC OR tS SQUIRED 0 CAKE 5. INSTALL A MINI 1 -I WA T MINI NLN WATER SERVICE 0 EACH LOT. METER OF PIPE TO f2 INCH S MINI" ABOVE T PIPE E I TARE 80 E OE I E SHALL BE 3/4 T T T T T X i FA TY PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES 0 PPo EC HE E IS lNG CILl EHOMN HOFON AND ANY OTHER WHICH IS NUT O RECORD OR HOT TO BE LOCATED 5-E T FgOI A T E SIDE LO LffE. A 3 /4 -INGIf HIOI LETTER 'W` BE CHISELED IN TOP O EXISTING CURB OR INCH CRUSHED ROCK. PIPE A.B.S. S SOLID ALL S E MY BE USED ONLY WHERE PIPE INVERT GRADES ARE f% OR GREA TROP. ON SHpNN QV THESE BANS. IMPRINTED IN NEW CURB AT ALL WATER EflVID OOS$INGS. IN 3. AFTER COMPLETION O PIPE LAYING, ALL WIN LINE SEWERS. 6 LOCATION AND ELEVATION O IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MET BY WORK 6. MANUAL ATid fELASES SWLL BE INSTALLED Ai ALL HIGH PoIMB SEWER SERVICE LATERALS AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE TESTED IN THE PRESENCE OF HE INSPECTOR. AIR PRESSURE TEST SHALL BE TO BE COME SHALL BE CONFIDED BY FIELD NEA -BENTS .1. TO COSTRUCTION O NEW MYK, CONTRALTOS WILL MAKE ANON BL FS AT ALL LOW POINTS IN THE WATER MAIN DOGREL FINE HYOPANI6 MAY E UEO SN LIEU O A M4WUN- AIR RELINE USED UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE INSPECTOR.. EXPLORATORY EXAVATIOS AND LOCATE EXISTING � FACILITIES SUFFICIENTLY AHEAD OF CONS TIM TO PERMIT E BLOW -OFF MIEN LOLATEG AT 0.9 NEAR HIS1 DR LOJ PoIMS AS APPROVED BY iE OISTAILi'S EHESENTATTVE. 4. THE CONSTRUCTION OF P.C.C. SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE PER SOFlSD N0. 5 -17. POURED IN PLACE MANHOLE BASES SHALL BE A ARE RE ACTUAL S TO PLANS IF STING REVISIONS FACE ITIES, SAPY BECAUSE O ACTUAL LOCATION O EXISTING FACILITIES. ]. UNLESS OTHERWISE HOTEO CONS A OS AT EXISTING MIKE BULL E MILE CRY. THE TINE AD BATIOJ O ANY MONOLITHIC POUR FINISHED COMPLETE AT THE TIME OF POUR. PRECAST MANHOLE BASES ARE ACCEPTABLE FOR USE WITH 8 -INCH COLLECTOR SYSTEMS WITH INSPECTOR'S APPROVAL. > THE CONTRACTOR BULL NOTIFY THE SAN DIE. AS 6 ELECTRIC PRIOR TO STARTING COMPANY FACILITIES L SH /TDOWB TR EXISTING MINE CTS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO WEEKS BY THE DISTRICT. DISTRICT BULL E NOTIFIED TWO M2kS 5, THE CONSTRUCTION OF 4 -INCH LATERALS LATERALS SHALL BE PER SOPS) NUS,S -f3 ANC S-14. LATERALS SHALL NOT DISCHARGE ORK WITH ANON SHALL TTVES. ITS HIS WON NITH.COMANY AND XPXSENTATIVES. 11 NSNIMM IN ADVANCE O ANY SUTEWN. DIRECTLY INTO MANHEES. NDTID: ALL ELECTRIC AND GAS SERVICES WITHIN B. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH DISTRICT ALL ARRANGEMENTS FOR HIGY- LINING TEMPORARY SERVICES ETC., S. THE CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE ANCHOB WALLS SHALL BE PER SORSD -S-10. TYPE A. THIS PROJECT ARE IMEPoRO&0 INSTALLATIONS '. FOR O PRIOR TO SHUTDOWNS. NO SdRDOWS WILL E SOEDUSO ON A 7. ALL Al. M AND LATERALS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH 42 -INCH LOCATION ELECTRICAL CABLES AM AS PIPING AN] FgIAY. MINIMUM COVER. AEFTBTENACES CALL SD.G.O E. ELEPIiOE: 1 BOO 422-4133 DIG ALERT) 9. LINE VALVES. METE EOUIRED AT S-1 INMASECTEOS BU L E LOCATED ON THE PROLONGATION O THE STREET RIGHT-)- B. THE FINAL.LOCATTDN AND ELEVATION OF SEWER AND WATER WINE AND LATERALS SHALL E SHOWN ON ORIGINAL S -BUILT PLANS, 8 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY PACIFIC ELL PRIOB TO WAY MfNEVER POSSIBLE. 9. ALL DESIGN CHANGES OF SEWER MAINS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE STARTING WOK NEAR LOMANY FACILITIES AND BULL COORDINATE HIS WORE WITH COMPANY ANY FANTATINES. 10. FINE HYDRAMS AS APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE FINE DISTRICT AM MEETING THE DISTRICT'S STANDARD DISTRICT ENGINEER IN WRITING PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE FOR PUBLIC USE NOTICE ALL MLEAHOE SERVICES WITHIN THIS SPECIFICATIONS, ARE TO E INSTALLED AT LOC41TO 5 SPECIFIED f0 FILL AREAS MUST BE COMPACTED TO 90% PRIOR TO PIPE INSTAL - RROJ£CT BOUNDARY ARE ,ODEPGPOIMU BY THE FINE DISTRICT. BY LATION. INSTALLATIONS'. FOR LOA TION O CAFES AND AFPI.RTENAACES CONTACT 11. SHALL NEVZEW ALL PROPOSED TEACH W.K WIN CAL /OSHA. A COPY O EXEMPTION LETTER O TRENCHING PERMIT, 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DISTRICT'S FIELD DPEflA iIONS DIVISION 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING WORK TO ARRANGE PACIFIC ELL. TELUMNE: 1 .O 422 -4133 DIG ALERT) IF REWTEQ BALL SE SUBMITTED TO THE DISTRICT PRIOR SO COJSTFLOTION. FOR INSPECTION OF PROJECT. (760) 633 -2770. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PERMIT FROM THE CITY'S ENGINEERING 9 IT SHALL E THE RESPOSIBAITY O THE DEVELOPER TO 12. ALL EXISTING FACILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT FINAL DESIGN I.E., SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR ANY EXCAVATION WITHIN EXISTING CITY LOMALI THE MILITY AGENCIES ADVISE THEM O THE PROP ED INFRYWNENTS, AND EAR THE COST O MLOCATIOH IF NEEDED. LINE CROSSINGS LINE PAFALLRING OR BRUE)SEO CONNECTIONS RIGHT OF WAY. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL, AND HEREBY DOES. GUARANTEE ALL SHALL E FIELD VERIFIED. ALL EXISTING 0.9 DOGGED UTILITY CROSSINGS X UTILITIES WITHIN f0 -I O PROPOSED "0 WATER WORT FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE 10 ALL 7 EVISI. SERVIES WITHIN THIS PROJECT ARE AIHOERGFKLNO INASTALUTIO G F. lDCATIM O AS.EB ANp MAINS BALL X SINN UMJ INEV10 PLANS, OF E WORN BY THE OWNER AND SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY OR ALL SUCH WORK. TOGETHER WITH ANY OTHER WORK WHICH APPURTENANCES CONTACT TELEPHONE: f -SDO- 422 -4133 13. ALL ER SERVICES FOR IRRIGATION MATIPLE RESIDENTIAL COMPLEXES AND COaEACIAL E INDUSTRIAL DVELOMENTS MAY BE DISPLACED IN SO DOING, THAT MAY PROVE DEFECTIVE IN WORKMANSHIP AND /OR MATERIALS WITHIN E ONE YEAR PERIOD 11 DOER SXRKES ANp MME SERVING STREET LIGHTS SMALL E SOWN ON THE S-BUILT" IMPROVEMENT DRAWINGS. ALL SOAVES SHALL E IDEATED WITHIN THE EDIATED RIGHT -O- BULL HAVE AN APPPpVEO ACCRON PREVENTION DEVICE ON CUBTOEgS SIX OF WATER METER, FROM DATE OF ACCEPTANCE WITHOUT EXPENSE WHATSDVER O THE OWNER, EXCEPTING ORDINARY NEAR AND TEAR, UNUSUAL ABUSE OR NEGLECT. WAY OR WITHIN EASEMENTS DOIADEO TO THE CITY OF 14. THE WATER SYSTEM $TALL E PFEEIBE TESTED IN ACCOMANKE 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AID SNSTALL, PER SPECIFICATIONS. ENLZNITAS 12 PAVING SHALL BE WER ROES ARE WITH THE P,4xEONES 1N THE STANDARD SPECIFIC, RE CLASS O PIPE SHALL E USM AS THE CESIUM NOHtING THE APPROPRIATE BURIED UTILITY WARNING AND IDENTIFICATION TAP dBOVE ALL PUBLIC EWER LINER, NO PORTIONS OF SEWER AOF T ARESDTO GS PAVER TENA C£OSTEST G ALL PIPE. VAL ES (0.0X01 AD LATEMIG LOCATED WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR EASEMENTS. 13 THE CONTRACTOR BALL NOTIFY AND OBTAIN APPROVAL O THE 15..NTRACTOR TO TIE OFF ALL VALVE LOATIOS AND PROM" 15. "AS- BUILT" DRAWINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. ,. N. CITY ENGINEER PRIX TO MAKING CHANGES IN THE FIELD. WRITTEN DIMENSTO S TO INSPECTOR IMMEDIATELY UPON INSTALLATION O VALVES. 16. THE DEVELOPER MAY BE REQUIRED TO GRADE AN ACCESS ROAD TO AINTAIN ANY PUBLIC SEWERS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN EASEMENTS 14 ALI SIGNS i0 E ALUMIM/M WITH 3 FORT HI. INTENSITY TYPE 16. ALL DEFLECTIONS (HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL) SHALL E MALE 0 MAY BE REWIRED TO DEDICATE AWITIONAL ACCESS REFLECTIVE FACE M EWIVALENT. BY USE O JOINT COUPLING$ WITH 4A MAXIMUM DEFLECTION PER COUP.- O PER JOINTS NO ENDING (CURVING) O PIPE SAID. EASEMENTS TO MAINTAIN THE PUBLIC SEWERS. 17, WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS AND PLUMBING PERMITS ARE 15 LCWTNACTOR BALL X(LEST FPON THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT. A PECOS TFUCTION MEETING AND SHALL PROVIDE AT LEAST d8 E PERMITTED REWIRED PRIOR TO CONNECTION TO SYSTEM. HGULS X NOTICE FOR SUCH A MEETING. f633 -2]70) 1I IS ALL .T AND FILL SLOPES OVER TREE (3) FEET CREATED BY GRAOINA -i FOR STREETS AND OIIVEWAYS SHALL E HYpRASEEED WITH CITY O ENCINITAS APPROVED HYOISEED MIXTURE. NVORGGSE SLOES BALL E IMIATED BY WATER TRUCK ONTA RE MIXTURE GEMINATES AND ODWTH IS ESTABLISHED. 17 ALL LUMINAIRES GULL PROVIDE TRUE 90' .iOF. AND ALLOW NO ESCAPE O LIGHT ABOVE THE HIRIZORAL. 16 PRIVATE WADE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR INFORMATION OLY. CITY OFFICIALS SIGNATURE HEREON ODES NOT CONSTITUTE OR ES CNOTBILITY O ANY KIND FOR THE DS ION OR CPFNOVAL ONSTRUCTION' O THESE PRIVATE IMROVEMENTS. (IF APPLICABLE) EXIST. AC EMI 19 CONCENTRATED FLOWS ACROSS DRIVEWAYS A IGN SIDEWALKS BALL NOT (TO E REMOVED AW.I EXIST PVNT I EXIST E PERMITTED. DRAINAGE SHALL E TRANSMITTED UNDER SIDEWALK. THROWN FACE O CUR, TO GUTTER M RELIC STREET. THE XVROOB SHALL E RESPONSIBLE THAT aNY MONAENT OR SEWN MAFM( NHICN IS OISTLRED CR XSTROYEO SHALL E RE {STABLISHED ANp FERACED BY A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER OR A LICENSED LAND SR EYO. 21 THE DEVELOPER SHALL M THE LOCATION O EACH SEDER LATERAL AO WATER SERVICE BY CHISELING THE LETTERS S" ANON `N'. RESPECTIVELY. 2 INCHES HIGH INTO THE FACE O THE N IN .r r ' N LEGAL DESCRIPTION EASTERLY .1A E .E.OF TE SE.1% N BE N .1/4 OF THE S£, 114 D THE NE. 114 O THE S£. 114 SEC. 23 T. 13 S_ R 4 W. AP.N: ESE- 160 -17 SITEADDRESS AND OU STI BNSBOOIVE AMING REAL OWNERIPERUTIME GRADER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION EINI AS ATA92024 BLVD. OWNER'S CERTFICATE IT IS AGREED TAT FIELD CONDITIONS NAY REQUIRE CHANGES TO THEE PLANS. - IT IS FURTHER AGAEEO THAT THE OWSR EVELORCi SHALL HAVE A AM TIOFEC CIVIL ENGINEER RAKE SUCH CHANGES, LEER DETOS NE S AEIWCES TO THESE 1. PLANS WHICH THE CITY ENGINEER DIE lION THE IMMPROVEMENTON AW CESIAS.E F. THIS PROPER CORLEFSO' O I FORTE? AGREE TO COMMENCE NOM( ON ANY IMPoVEMENTS BONN ON THESE RA. WITHIN EXISTING CITY pIOR -OF -MAV WITHIN . DAYS O AFTER THE COWNUCTION PERMIT AND TO PUS" SUCH ISSUANCE ARK ACTIVELY ON EVERY NORMAL MORKING AY UNTIL COMPLETED, ILIA AND INDEPENDENT OF AN OTHER LURK ASSOCIATED WITH THIS � / / 'STUART q� / � - fAAIER FW%pATIBN FOR EOICAt1ON GATE 2210 ENDINITAS MVO. ENCINITASA 9.24 DECLARATRONOF RESPONSIBLE CKARGE I NEREBY ECLATE THAT T AM THE ENGINEER O WO& FQP THIS PROJECT. THAT I HAVE EXERCISE) RESPONSIBLE CHANGE OVER THE OESISN O THE -I AS EFIfED IN SECTION 6]03 O THE BEINESS AM RMFESSM5 COD. AND THAT THE RESIGN IS COSI57EM WITH CRRENT STNARDS, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHECK O PROTECT OTAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS BY THE CITY O ENCINITAS 15 CONFINED TO A RE VIEW ONLY AID DOES NOT RELIEVE ME AS ENGINEER O MOM, O MY RESPONSIBILITIES FE PFOECT RESI(nW. NAY GAD � S 25]7 �7 /.ASE WORKTOWDONE IMPROVEENTS CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING WRY TO BE DONE ACCORDING TO INEE FLANS THE CURRENT SAN DIE. COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PBLIC WORM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INPROVEHENT OF SUBDIVISION STREETS AND STANDARDS B59MBENCE OAWINGS. GO.C. s SAN DIE. COUNTY D SDP. SAN IT R DISTRICT DIEGO PRECAST SDRIED, SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD OMWINGS LEGEND: NO. ITEM SOSD SYMBOL OTY PMECT BORDARY ROAD CEN_INE - - - EXISTING RIGHT-) -WAY 1 CONSTRUCT -M CURB AND GUTTER G1 ABU- LF 2 COSTFMKi CONCRETE SIDEWALK D-1 2295 SF 3 CONSTRUCT MIN. 6W OVER 16-CLASS II BASE CITY O EMC,.- .............. M72 E STANOARX -� -- GAMUT EXIST . PAVEMNT WA - -- ILA LF q I T A OV AY A Y NIA ABA9 OF 5 INSTALL C EPL S NXSSM / ©REMOVE EXIST, a/C DIKE WA 482.64 IF O ADAST EXISTING RMHOLE RIM TO GRACE N/A (J 2 EA CITY O ENC. 7 2 Ea TREE LIGHT LNSTAL STREET 8 ENO. E -1 O Q (WOVE EXISTING SIGN WA o 1 EA f0 INSTALL TYPE A CUR OUTLET 0-. �_��_�� A EA yN O CONETRET O( PVC SEWER LATERAL TO R E-11 V f EA \'ESTWATED OUANnTIFS CUT 200 C.Y.x FILL 200 C. Y.x EXPORT O C. Y.x X EARTHWORK QUANTITIES dRE ESTIMATED FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY. (CAL CULATTEED ON A THEORETICAL BASIS. ACTUAL QUANTITIES MAY VARY DUE TO SHRINKAGE OR SWELL FACTORS), SOILS ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I, BRETT L. A REGISTERED - TECHNICAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF CALIFOANSA, A41rALLY DOING BUSINESS IN THE FIELD O APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SAMPLING ANON STUDY O THE .IL CONDITIONS PREVALENT WITHIN THIS SITE WAS MACE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION BETWEEN THE DATES D ONE REM(.EIE CONY O THE .TLS REPORT COMPILED FROM THIS STUDY. WITH MY ELIXMENATIONS, HAS EDEN SIBASTTED TO TNE OFFICE O TX CITY ENGINEER. FLRTFEMOPE I HAVE REVIEWED TREE IPROVEMENi FLANS AND DPTIFY THAI THE RECONENDATIONS INOLEEG tN TX SONS EP.i FO4 THIS PROJECT HAVE BEEN INIERPORAT. Iry TNE IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND SPELIFIATIOS, APP VEO DAT4,I- PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECON E Al RGVED � BP....O RATE: 2 0l BY L / N S R.C.E. NO.�g$,7� RAT E: �l3/eI DATE: 9 30 A nn n -n ,-I U WA NE PASCO E %P.�,L:Qg SIGNED: 1MK U'1/M""- PlL Tel BE1T'L. AMOELSON GATE PCE 45393 EXP. DATE: 9 -30 -2002 SLAODN ENGINEERING BUENA 6782 SUITE E AS.. CA90 1 (562) 864 -4121 TENNIS CLUB DRIVE -\ � U U3 SITE 9iF MAN-STEP VICINITY AIr1P rr O ' g2 T CAMOF SANITATION DTSIRICf APPRGV BY: GSM .ATEJ� N c =opENcmrASENGugEERIN(}DSPARTmmT I DRAwiNa NC MROVEMENT PLAN FOR' EL CA VVO REAL 7065-1 m IN CURB. THE ADDRESS O EACH LOT SHALL E PAINTED ON THE COS IN A EXIST, CARE AND GUTTER ' MANNER AMID LOCATION APPROVED BY THE INSPECTAP. `G' INSTALL B" AL PVMT OVER I6" AG. ASE 21 ALL WORK SHALL E DOE IN ACCO UMCE WITH THE STANDARD PROPOSED 6" CAR AE .,TER STD DWG G -2 SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WOKS CONSTRUCTION (LATEST EDITIONA USE AN DIEGO STANOAG SPECIAL PROVISIONS TO THE STANDARD P(OP0.SE0 5' WIRE P. SIx"_ Si0 GAG G -] \ SECIFIATIOS F. PUMIC WORKS COSIRETION (ADOPTED BY THE SAN CIE. EGIONN STANARDS COMMITTEEA AM iNE SAW DIE. INSTAL A. W HIGH SODIUM SONNET LIGHT REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS (LATEST EDITION). TYPICAL STREET SECTION 22 THE STRUCTUAAL SECTION SHALL E IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY O EWINITAS STANNEGG AND AS APPROVED BY THE CITY EL LAMING EA1. NUT TO SCA LE ENGINEER. R" VALE TESTS SHALL BE REGUIRED PRIOR TO CUNSMUCTION. (PRIVATE) TI -12.0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION EASTERLY .1A E .E.OF TE SE.1% N BE N .1/4 OF THE S£, 114 D THE NE. 114 O THE S£. 114 SEC. 23 T. 13 S_ R 4 W. AP.N: ESE- 160 -17 SITEADDRESS AND OU STI BNSBOOIVE AMING REAL OWNERIPERUTIME GRADER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION EINI AS ATA92024 BLVD. OWNER'S CERTFICATE IT IS AGREED TAT FIELD CONDITIONS NAY REQUIRE CHANGES TO THEE PLANS. - IT IS FURTHER AGAEEO THAT THE OWSR EVELORCi SHALL HAVE A AM TIOFEC CIVIL ENGINEER RAKE SUCH CHANGES, LEER DETOS NE S AEIWCES TO THESE 1. PLANS WHICH THE CITY ENGINEER DIE lION THE IMMPROVEMENTON AW CESIAS.E F. THIS PROPER CORLEFSO' O I FORTE? AGREE TO COMMENCE NOM( ON ANY IMPoVEMENTS BONN ON THESE RA. WITHIN EXISTING CITY pIOR -OF -MAV WITHIN . DAYS O AFTER THE COWNUCTION PERMIT AND TO PUS" SUCH ISSUANCE ARK ACTIVELY ON EVERY NORMAL MORKING AY UNTIL COMPLETED, ILIA AND INDEPENDENT OF AN OTHER LURK ASSOCIATED WITH THIS � / / 'STUART q� / � - fAAIER FW%pATIBN FOR EOICAt1ON GATE 2210 ENDINITAS MVO. ENCINITASA 9.24 DECLARATRONOF RESPONSIBLE CKARGE I NEREBY ECLATE THAT T AM THE ENGINEER O WO& FQP THIS PROJECT. THAT I HAVE EXERCISE) RESPONSIBLE CHANGE OVER THE OESISN O THE -I AS EFIfED IN SECTION 6]03 O THE BEINESS AM RMFESSM5 COD. AND THAT THE RESIGN IS COSI57EM WITH CRRENT STNARDS, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHECK O PROTECT OTAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS BY THE CITY O ENCINITAS 15 CONFINED TO A RE VIEW ONLY AID DOES NOT RELIEVE ME AS ENGINEER O MOM, O MY RESPONSIBILITIES FE PFOECT RESI(nW. NAY GAD � S 25]7 �7 /.ASE WORKTOWDONE IMPROVEENTS CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING WRY TO BE DONE ACCORDING TO INEE FLANS THE CURRENT SAN DIE. COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PBLIC WORM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INPROVEHENT OF SUBDIVISION STREETS AND STANDARDS B59MBENCE OAWINGS. GO.C. s SAN DIE. COUNTY D SDP. SAN IT R DISTRICT DIEGO PRECAST SDRIED, SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD OMWINGS LEGEND: NO. ITEM SOSD SYMBOL OTY PMECT BORDARY ROAD CEN_INE - - - EXISTING RIGHT-) -WAY 1 CONSTRUCT -M CURB AND GUTTER G1 ABU- LF 2 COSTFMKi CONCRETE SIDEWALK D-1 2295 SF 3 CONSTRUCT MIN. 6W OVER 16-CLASS II BASE CITY O EMC,.- .............. M72 E STANOARX -� -- GAMUT EXIST . PAVEMNT WA - -- ILA LF q I T A OV AY A Y NIA ABA9 OF 5 INSTALL C EPL S NXSSM / ©REMOVE EXIST, a/C DIKE WA 482.64 IF O ADAST EXISTING RMHOLE RIM TO GRACE N/A (J 2 EA CITY O ENC. 7 2 Ea TREE LIGHT LNSTAL STREET 8 ENO. E -1 O Q (WOVE EXISTING SIGN WA o 1 EA f0 INSTALL TYPE A CUR OUTLET 0-. �_��_�� A EA yN O CONETRET O( PVC SEWER LATERAL TO R E-11 V f EA \'ESTWATED OUANnTIFS CUT 200 C.Y.x FILL 200 C. Y.x EXPORT O C. Y.x X EARTHWORK QUANTITIES dRE ESTIMATED FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY. (CAL CULATTEED ON A THEORETICAL BASIS. ACTUAL QUANTITIES MAY VARY DUE TO SHRINKAGE OR SWELL FACTORS), SOILS ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I, BRETT L. A REGISTERED - TECHNICAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF CALIFOANSA, A41rALLY DOING BUSINESS IN THE FIELD O APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SAMPLING ANON STUDY O THE .IL CONDITIONS PREVALENT WITHIN THIS SITE WAS MACE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION BETWEEN THE DATES D ONE REM(.EIE CONY O THE .TLS REPORT COMPILED FROM THIS STUDY. WITH MY ELIXMENATIONS, HAS EDEN SIBASTTED TO TNE OFFICE O TX CITY ENGINEER. FLRTFEMOPE I HAVE REVIEWED TREE IPROVEMENi FLANS AND DPTIFY THAI THE RECONENDATIONS INOLEEG tN TX SONS EP.i FO4 THIS PROJECT HAVE BEEN INIERPORAT. Iry TNE IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND SPELIFIATIOS, APP VEO DAT4,I- PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECON E Al RGVED � BP....O RATE: 2 0l BY L / N S R.C.E. NO.�g$,7� RAT E: �l3/eI DATE: 9 30 A nn n -n ,-I U WA NE PASCO E %P.�,L:Qg SIGNED: 1MK U'1/M""- PlL Tel BE1T'L. AMOELSON GATE PCE 45393 EXP. DATE: 9 -30 -2002 SLAODN ENGINEERING BUENA 6782 SUITE E AS.. CA90 1 (562) 864 -4121 TENNIS CLUB DRIVE -\ � U U3 SITE 9iF MAN-STEP VICINITY AIr1P rr O ' g2 T CAMOF SANITATION DTSIRICf APPRGV BY: GSM .ATEJ� N c =opENcmrASENGugEERIN(}DSPARTmmT I DRAwiNa NC MROVEMENT PLAN FOR' EL CA VVO REAL 7065-1 m IN algg.^ yq �'s� r _ , � „ -t �t-+ , �. ' :. } ', ' i � .. �.k ESA I EA5- e�A'�'i�n �vs ALA I R -L-)T• L _ .�`- ° j I _ w L-i , -- -+ - iL- y t- �`..�.: ` ��._ + 1 -__� - ± �I - ii 1 �I,, �tI ` T�� J- : }. 7- I- }..,.. " "" "'� + i_' -+ T `- �`J' t--F `-k i• j_x - , _ -i T- _+ T;-' '+- -}- } {_ -� 7T� - - - I 1. } $ -, - #' rl Irl L I,I �r � rl �� x ��fi I 1 + � ' ,��II - ' z z a o S CQA9INIlCMXJ7J076 �# 816 ,.. F Fw 1 C0.NSTRL'CT CIXJL 1 — AND GUTTER PER SENSE, G-2. 6 �v6 y3� 4 s dl S TYPE AO - -E ODTL ES PER .. � --_ !Rv 2 COA6iPoKi CONCRETE BI�wALX PER SORSO G -J 3 CDNSTWCi MIN. SIC DYER 16 "MASS II BASE PER EMC. SIDS , ry i J U6 m m W I Y t PER PLAN (28 LT EL CAMTMJ REAL TYP) jy., Y3I -. g rL M - 1 '� I }. 1 LOCATION DP WINDOWS Ih m ^' � 5 CONISTMUCT AC OVER-AY AS NECESSARY TO PROVIOE A SMODTH TRANSITION " 8 _ S o l I;, � ,�" T S-` - •- P ° -. PER SECTION A -A TT .. rilh 6 REMOVE EX Si. ACNE a �L O "ST EXISTING MANHOLE RIM TO GRADE AS NICESSAFlV PER t P F OINSTALL STREET LIGHT CITY OF ENE STD. E -1 ( - 5 S —. S S —5 - -5 5 —S— IA� n� PVD SHOtyN i. I� ' 0.Y PLACE ©l. O lHALIE TYPE 4 .. _ 3 y CJ 5 SEWER LATERAL PER SGF50 S 13 io o3� R` —� 3 5 t _ TRH P�9 FLOW BEGTANA# 6 —I& ICT d a — _ _ _ i wW w F 215+00 00 wi tf + _ ~— _ Z1HffiD 2f DO CAAWV0 -REAL DETAIL A: TRIPLED 25 CURB OUTLET NOT TO —E 4ab �0 �Av+...,! WS�S I, I PLAN: REAL _EL_CAMINO NTA LDE BEARDA DELTA AIDIUS iM REIWAAW ., Lf — .x"9'30 461 b8' 6' CWY. CURB 6 GUTTER G -2 REVISIONS APPROVED DATE REFERENCES DATE BENCHMARK SCALE Y � r APPROVALS CPPY OP ENCIIVITAS ENOIIVESMO DEPARThfl3NT DRAvmONO, EsCRTPTIDN Ci iv OF ENCSNITA3 P-001 REAL MEO tax ANO s N EL MIND N REAL IA F HINER IN SASIN Izaul VERTicnL , PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF DATE: L7 O P.C.E. N0.3$5Z� NE RECD7EN(y'/� APPROV BY: JI+LBM�,�bp BY: / 9/�3 I DATE: DATE: 9 3 0 IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR' t�7 �II7�' �,{�'�� 7 �+� l �I . CAARNO �� SH ELEVATION ]12.48 DATUM: USC 6 G6 .z; algg.^ yq �'s� Landscape Construction Documents .for G R A U E R S S C H O O L E N C I N I T A S C A L I F O R N I A. El Camino Real & & Tennis Club Drive ❖ OWNER /DEVELOPER: ❖ENGINEER: ❖ ❖ARCHITECT: ❖ ❖LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: THE GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION PASCO ENGINEERING J JOHN Mc<NLEY G GIII STONE 2210 ENCINITAS BLVD. STE. T. 535 NO. HIGs4wAY 101, STE. A 7 710 137H STREET 0 307 1 135 LIVERPOOL- SUITE "E ", ENCINITAS, CA. 92024 SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 S SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 C CARDIMI THE SEA CA, 92007 CARE OF STUART GRADER (858) 259 -8212 6 619) 283 1811 7 760) 943 -8488 CONTACT: WAl'NE PASCO C CONTACT: GARY STONE ABBREVIATIONS: VICINITY MAP: S SHEET INDEX: N NOTES: AB5 acRYLON rR LE BUT NE EA, EACH PA PLANT NG AREA • • TIM LE SHEET -- - -- L -I T I HEREBY DECLARE THAT AM THE L GENE% DESIGNER OF WORK, AOJ. ADJACENT J _ _ - f ftREN 6 SP ALT Cq�CR =iE O. V • IRRIGATION LC -6CND $ NOTES - - -- L -5 A SPEC F CATIONS BY THE C iY 6 ENCM TAS DOER NO RELIEVE ME, m L F<NOWL GE P6 POUND PER SGVORED nC A E IRRIGATION DETAILS - - - - -- I. b $ L-T � THESE A T A � �iP— ION�ED E MANDHEBTER O E • IRRIGATION SPEGIFIGATIONS - - - - L -8 EIRE LANDSCAPII.G.BPLAN W BEN AL V. GALVANEED R • LAND56APE PLAN - -- -- -- L -9, L -10 $ L BY;_PRE ARER ___ DATE: IAEIN _L EN ER - NVERT ELEVATION D STORY DRAN rER NCH RED SAN D EGO REG a,IAL • • LANDSCAPE LC-GEND— - -- L -12 - _NCE GRADE VERT. AND HOR Z S T. SECT ON A i ONST1 Kr IF LINEAL FEET 69 SANITARY SEDER - - w. MANDPACnRER 66Pwc g - • • LAND5GAPE DETAILS - - -- L -15 E6 GATED STEEL PIPE T BLE R FE DECOMPOSED GRANITE VERTCICALL A WATER ME WN'I WELDED W ezoo J,z� •,. " "' - -- - - -- ° °' - - - -- APPROVALS C CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO. E PIPMi SHO'JN "HN PANIY FOR OLAR11r ONLr, AnA MAN.M AND LA7fRAL5 LOCATION TO BE A MNMA9 OF 17' OF ADJACEM HARDFAPE AND OTNER 0&SiACLES ttP. - --- ' M®C�41�IN S 6� 3 � 1 � I i I / � I , I , SEE 10 &GALE PLAN 6-4 FOR 7I.11& AREA 1. I t I :2 w I 1 391 I Y A- ° / 4 fur ' ( 13 FORCLNIR<R1ER'A � w ��^a -. � /2" M 43f 38 w A 11 iw I A 6 I ' L 45 rp 814 A813 FE .... x7 E r GOIVTROLLEiR "AIL 4 IGG -4000 M H z. CONTROWR (UN1EW M4BT \R vALNF k_ r�au rlmR nse SEE SHEET L -5 FOR IRRIGATION LEGEND t NOTES ,. P °a STpTIONe 6vpl�pDU: nm BEE SHEET L -b a L -7 FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS mnTlode ua_ A9 SEE SHEET L -8 FOR IRRIGATION P®WC PLOW 45 GFM sax ieo- saa -os♦s SCALE: 1' =20' REFERENCES - A REVSONS ovED DnrE DnTe BENCHMARK SCALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - -- - - - =- N A }.... ec- .. -..... APPROVALS CITY OF ENC_INITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO. - -- - PIANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APPROVED LANDSLME Pllw pRAW NG FOR --- - - - - -- I _20_- p m., Rr _ -. THE CsRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION L_2 _..... ..... _.- -_ PATE: - -. IRRIGATION PLAN - -- - -- woRrc P.Ul —NO. SHEET 2 OF IS ' _....... PAL_ IS enter 13" aw Sanaor 258 i I v. Y PIPMG SHO1N WHIM PAMNG TOR 4ARItt ONL� . 11 _ OLNAL MAMLINE AND LATERALS LOLAiIGN Sew A -I _ TO BE A MINIMJT OF V pF ADJACENT A -.Ib I'I NI AND OTHER OBSiACaS TYP j n A -20 i" I I - Ai2 SEE 10 SCALE PLAN L -4 FOR THIS ARIA e �vHEET (� MGHLIN � 2 rL �Arvosc.oE y�' SEE SHEET L -5 FOR IRRIGATION LEGEND d NOTES SEE 6HEET L -6 e L -'I FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS 3 SEE SHEET L -8 FOR IRRIGATION SPECIP ICAT IONS ut- -e9Be _ scnce: r =zo' �slons APPAOVeo o.rE REreRERCES oA:e BENCHMARK SCALE —_ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT —_ _..._.__. . -__. TOrvE " "' — "' - -' s'A's' " "' - - -' -- n "" "'--' APPROVALS ____PROVAL CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO. LAnoscAPE PLAU DRAW NC rOR -- — .__....... .1�=2o PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF MR. s2oo+ RECOMMENDED APPROVED D.:___.__ THE CsRAUER FOUNDA710N FOR EDUCATION L -3 DATE IRRIGATION PLAN SHEET 3 OF 15 SEAT LL LL 6LAB — A .._ .L_q . , s L A r 3 /a• i "11 X,\/ Of l — I (o ® SEAT WALL DETAIL. NTS. I O I. O I PROPOSED EiLDCs.�i` ��r �__, 7AMAINLINE AT THIS LO IRRIGATION N J J I SEE ARCH I7EC7'S PLANS CATION l� r -- --1 1 — Z d r _a' J r IN 1 3/4 I I _ LL 1 ns^ I D/4 �5 ' o 314 �- ______ — — — — — — — — — — I I I I— 1— I— I— I— I— I— I— I— I LIMIT OF WORK SEE SHEET L.-E, FOR IRRIGATION LEGEND 4 NOTES �� r SEE SHEET L -6 4 L-1 FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS SEE SHEET L -8 FOR IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS �11- 101�1(/u >eo- oaa -oe.a -- Aevrslorvs aPPAOVEn DnrE RDFeRervcES Dare BENCHMARK SCALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - -c siaue NssA n.s A I CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO. h- "- " "-'-'- - -'--- PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN DRAWING FOR: ar _ THE GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION (_4 DATE, _ IRRIGATION PLAN — __._.. __.............._ - P-TNO. SHEET 4 OF i5 LIMIT OF WORK POURED CONC. �20 6X6XI0 -10 WIRE ___ -.� OAP 3"X26"' a /A�2 2 g��_6" ROCK VENEER 20" T SPRINKLERS B�1 Q T H F WC MANUFAGT MODEL NO /DESCRIPTION ,,W GPM PSI RADIUS DCTAL5 i a' -T RAIN B Rp 1 1004 -SAM- PG5 (N 0- RF AREAS) 5952 T9, IST 30 BFT . ABeG 0 ' _.. 1 j RA. N.. BIRD 1004 -SAM 2 PG5 (TLRF AREAS) 65 BT 13,.26 30 2 FT A, B e G �. 1 RAIN BIRD __— __ IB04 -SAM 5 PG5 (TURF AREAS) 93123�1853T0 _. 30 _... IS FT A, B d G 4 '5) gi(5) RAIN. BIRD B 2- SAM -O -PCB (SHRUB AREAS) 59, 52, 19, 151 50 8 FT A, B d G T b) `q�' RAN BIRD 0 2 -SAM 12 PGS (SHRUB AREAS) _ 65 .11 15,26 50 12 IT A, B d G 'O II / N2 RAIN BIRO 1612-SAM-IS-PC5 (SHRUB AREAS) — 95I 123, BS 310 50 15 FT A B a c RAIN BIRD 1012 -SAM -- PG5 - EST /SST STRIP (SHRUB AREAS) 60,:20 _ 25 5X30/15 FT A,B fl G RAIN BIRD SHRUB H -POP 1402 BUBBLER HEAP 50 25 3 FT G ROTORS O O O HUNTER HUNTER P6 12 -A -V 10/1,5/50 005, I5, 2S 50 25 FT A e B ® O © HUNTER HUNTER P6H.12- ADV -XX _/4O/lo 01, 1.2, 2.6 30 2B FT A fl B O O O HUNTER HUNTER FOH 12 -ADV XX 401101F, 12, 20, 42 SO 1 ES FT A 8 B 10 II 12 UNTCR HUNTER I 12- ADV-XX 10.0 / 11.0 / 12D 6.0, 80, 11.4 40 451 A E B 4 '5) gi(5) HUNTER HUNTER P6H 04- ADV-XX 20/40/7,0 Opl, 12.2.6 BO 20 FT A d B T b) `q�' HUNTCR HUNTER 6 04- ADV-XX HO/1,/R1 1,2 2. 4. J SD 39 PT A E B 'O II / N2 .BUNTER HUNTER P O4- ADV -XX IO,O / 11.0 / 120 6D, 0.0. ILA 40 45 FT A 8 B P.O.C. /CONTROLLERS ELECTRIC4L IRRIG41I NOTES I ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL AND STATE LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING OR RELATING TO ANY PORTION OF THIS WORK ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO AND MADE A PART OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS AND THEIR PROVISIONS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR. 2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND SERVICES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND SERVICES SHOWN IN THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE PLANE AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED. TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. S THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE PERTINENT ENSINEERIN& OR ARCHITECTURAL PLANS BEFORE- BEGINNING WORK. 4 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM THE WORK INDICATED HEREIN BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 5 THIS DESIGN 15 DIA6RAMMATIC. ALL EQUIPMENT SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN CLARITY ONLY AND 15 TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN PLANTING AREAS NECESSARY. 6 DO NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL ANY EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT UNKNOWN CONDITIONS EXIST THAT WERE NOT EVIDENT AT THE TIME THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED. ANY SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL BE BOUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO ANY WORK OR THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY FIELD CHANGES DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE OWNER 1 INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL CITY, COUNTY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION. 8 ACTUAL LOCATION FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE BACK FLOW FREVENTER AND THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER IS TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. 9 CONTRACTOR 15 TO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL PILOT WIRE TO THE END OF THE MAINLINE RUN IN TWO DIRECTIONS FROM THE CONTROLLER -AS NOTED. IO ALL PIPE UNDER PAVED AREAS TO BE INSTALLED IN A SOH. 40 SLEEVE TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPECARRIED. ALL AIRE UNDER PAVED AREAS TO BE INSTALLED IN A 5GH, 40 SLEEVE THE SIZE REQUIRED TO EASILY PULL ARE THROUGH ALL SLEEVES TO BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM DEPTH AS SHOWN ON THE 5LEEVIN6 DETAILS. SLEEVES TO EXTEND AT LEAST 12" PAST THE EDGE OF THE PAVING, ALL SLEEVES TO BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANSADISTANCE. II ALL OJOK COUPLER VALVES TO BE INSTALLED IN SHRUB OR GROUND COVER AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE. ALL QUICK COUPLER VALVES TO BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THE INSTALLATION DETAILS, INSTALL ALL QUICK COUPLER VALVES WITHIN I0" OF HARDSGAPE. 12 ALL VALVE BOXES TO BE GREEN IN COLOR, SIZED AS INDICATED BY DETAILS, AND HOT BRANDED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS OR DETAILS. 13 ALL HEADS ARE TO BE INSTALLED WITH THE NOZZLE, SCREEN AND ARCS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ALL HEADS ARE TO BE ADJUSTED TO PREVENT OVEREPRAY ONTO BUILDING, WALLS, FENCES AND HARDSGAPE THIS INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADJUSTMENT OF pIFFUSER PIN OR ADJUSTMENT SCREW, REPLACEMENT OF PRESSURE COMPENSATING SCREENS, REPLACEMENT OF NOZZLES WITH MORE APPROPRIATE RADIUS UNITS AND THE REPLACEMENT OF NOZZLES WITH ADJUSTABLE ARC UNITS. 14 ALL SPRAY HEADS INSTALLED FARTHER THAN FIVE (5) FEET FROM PAVING, DRIVEWAYS, CURBS, TURF BOUNDARIES, TOPS OF WALLS AND OTHER PEDESTRIAN AREAS MAY BE INSTALLED AS SHRUB ADAPTERS ON A 50H. 60 RISER, TOP OF HEAD 12" ABOVE GRADE. 15 ALL HEADS INDICATED ON THE PLANS AT A SPAGINS LE55 THAN 15 % OF FULL OPEN THROW, AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, ARE TO RECEIVE A PGS SCREEN OF APPROPRIATE SIZE TO REDUCE THE RADIUS TO MORE CLOSELY MATCH THE SPAGIN6, REFER TO THE MANUFACTURER'S CHARTS PROVIDED WITH PGS SCREENS FOR SIZING OF SCREENS, 16 ALL SPRAY HEADS THAT DO NOT CONFORM TO PRESCRIBED NOZZLE RADIUS' SHALL BE FITTED WITH PRESSURE COMPENSATING SCREENS TO ACHIEVE PROPER RADIUS /THROW DISTANCE POINT OF GONNEGTION AC AL POD LOCATION TO BE AS PE516NATED BY WATER DISTRICT AND - OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL POO AND MAINLfNE ROUTING INFORMATION PRIOR TO GOMMENCIN6 WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE- FOR COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF ALL REQUIRED COMPONENTS DOWNSTREAM OF THE PROPOSED METER. SGREENIN(5 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES AND CONTROLLERS ARE TO BE LOCATED IN SUCH A MANNER 50 AS TO BE SCREENED FROM FRONT YARD AND EXTERIOR SIDE YARD VIEWE, . SCREENING MAY BE WITH ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING FEATURES OR PLANT MATERIALS OR AS REQUIRED IN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. LOW HEAD DRAINAGE: CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CHECK. VALVES AT (HUNT "HCV") TO PREVENT LOW HEAD DRAINAGE AT EACH SPRINKLER AS REOUIRE PIPE SIZING: CHART IRRIGATION VALVE IGEY DIAMETER OIL b[. OIL 515 50.40 m Mline onl CONTROLLER - STATION NUMBER x -x VALVE SIZE � - -� Y Z.. GALLC_NS PER MINUTE (Grm) 3/4" B -II GPM 6 -8 GPM I" -- 11 -I6 GPM 9 -13 GFM I I /4" 11 -26 GPM � � 14 -23 GPM I -I/2" ?1 -36 GPM 24 -56 GFM ' 2" 31 -51 GPM 31 -51 GPM �oeCyE �r. wl A oa —IFIR.L. Dare BENCHMARK SCALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT p' - -- - APPROVALS _ CITY OF ENCINITAS CO_M_MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO, ____ rve _ vcm M-AN 111 -10 UNDER THE 11111VIS O RECOMMENDED APPROVED �arvoscaaE ULAN DRAWING FOR _ e. __. _ THE GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION L_5 Da �, a -- _. Tr_' - D ^TE IRRIGATION LEGEND 4 NOTES _- b -- k 5,�,�r'��,�r �i� �, r r I E � 1 i� r � i Y. ' 1�i+ T�II I- �� $ 1i , 1 -11 I I - _I I I 1 I 1I F I I I i - 5 2 � - x 1 = 4 I I T I x T I 6 _ - i - .. - -( � 6 4 B 2 4 5 ,- 7 Imo, O 2 1 8 I. POP -UP SPRAY/ROTOR HEAP PER LEGEND( I. SHRUB HI -POP SPRAY /ROTOR HEAD PER LEGEND I. FINISH(( &RAPE 2. F/C SLN SO NIPPLE - 12" MINIMUM LENGTH S. PVC 5CH 40 STREET ELL - TXT 2. PVL SCH 80 NIPPLE - 12" MINIMUM LENGTH 5. PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL - TXT I. NOTES, 2. PVC SCH 50 NIPPLE - LENGTH AS REQUIRED LOW HEAD DRAINASE WILL NOT 2. CLEAN BACKPILL - 9O% COMPACTION REQ)IRED - SEE SPECS 5. NON - PRESSURE LATERAL LINE PER LEGEND 4. MARLEX STREET ELL - T%T 5. PVL SCH - LATERAL LINE FITTING 4. MAR-EX STREET ELL - TXT 5. PVC SCH 40 LATERAL LINE FITTING $. SHRUB AND /OR &ROUND LOVER PLANT(- BE ALLOWED. CONTRACTOR TO 4. FINISH GRADE INSTALL ANTI -DRAIN VALVES ON 4. PRESSURE SUPPLY LIMB PER LEBEIm 5. CONTROL WIRES - INSTALL BELOW PRES..RE SLPPLY LINE 6. LATERAL LINE PER EQUIPMENT LEGEND T. FINISH .BADE 6. LATERAL LINE PER LEGEND 1. FINISH GRADE .. ANTI -DRAIN VALVE AS REQUIRED ALL HEADS THAT SHOW DRAIN- 6. P/C SLH 40 LATERAL LINE FITTING AGE AFTER VALVE IS SHUT OFF. 6. PROVIDE 2" OF CLEAN SAND BELOW PRESSURE MAINLINE NOTES. NOTES: 1. MAR-EX 5TREET ELL - T, THIS SHP BE INCLUDED AT B. PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL - TXT NO ADDITIONAL NER. LOST TO OW NOTES. BUNDLE AND TAPE WIRE5 AT 12' O.C. PISTAIL AND LOOP USE TEFLON TAPE ON ALL MALE PIPE THREADS FOR P/C TO V. CONNECTIONS. SET PERIMETER HEADS i " -2" FROM EDGE OF WALK, WALL, OR -1 ETC. ALL FITTN65 USE TEFLON TAPE ON ALL MALE PIPE THREADS FOR PVG TO PVC -Ni SET PERIMETER HEADS 2°-6" PROM EDGE AND AND ° FROM FIXED VERTICAL R. LATERAL LINE PIPING PER LEGEND 10. WALL, PENCE, OR CURB, ETC, CONTROL WIRES AT ALL 90 DEGREE CHAN6E5 IN DIRECTION. SPLICIN& OF WIRE RUNS IS NOT ALLOWED UNLESS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 86" MIN. COVER 15 REQUIRED FOR RECLAIMED WATER FOR SWING .(DINTS MUST SE SAME 512E AS INLET ON OF CURBS WALKS, b -12" OBJECS SUCH AS FENCES, WALLS, AND EUILDIN65, ETC. 11. NATIVE SOIL + 12" ABOVE PIN- GRADE FOR SHRUB HEADS MAINLINE (KeRE APPLICABLE). INSTALL I'XI'XI' THRUST AT ALL BASE OF HEAD. LATERAL LINE FITTING OUTLET SHALL BE SAME 512E AS HEAD INET.ERMINAL BOTTOM INLET OF HEAD MUST BE USED. B" ABOVE FINISH GRADE FOR BUBBLERS GHANbES IN DIRECTION OF PRESSURE MAINLINE AND AT ALL POINTS OF MAINLINE. A 'Turf Pop -Up Head B Shrub Hi -Pop Head C Shrub Fixed Riser Spray Head D Trenching (D- 4 A- r i h I S �� IB• -24 3 " ? .-. --® 11 MIN. 5 5 1 2 ✓ 2 L >J, I. HARDSCAF£(TYPIGAL) 2. CLEAN BACKFILL - 90% COMPACTION REQUIRED - SEE EMCS � -_- 4.� K�% °e.„)Ury --�' 4 B. SAND frYPICAU I. 10° ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING LID 10" ROUND PLASTIC VALVE BO% WILOCKINb LID 4. NON - PRESSURE LATERAL LINE / SLEEVE (SIZE PER CHART) 1. 51-IF BASE SOCKET OVER END OF WIREE 2. STRIP WIRES APPROX. 5 /B' FROM ENDS -TWIST TOGETHER 2. HEAT ERAND BRAND "PR" ON LID IN 2" H16H CHARACTERS 2. HEAT BRAND 'BV" ON LID IN 2" HIGH CHARACTERS 3. FINISH GRADE 5. CONTROL WIRE SLEEVE ADJACENT TO MAINLINE SLEEVE (SIZE PER CHART) 6. PRESSURE SLPPLY LINE / SLEEVE (SIZE FER CHART) S. APPLY SEALER TO OUTSIDE OF SEALINS PLUS AND FILL CAVITY WITH SEALER S PIN1e�H SRADM 4, S/4° CRI5HED ROCK - 4" DEEP 4. 5/4" CRUSHED ROCK - 4" DEPTH NOTE NOTE5. 4. PUT CRIMP END OVER WIRE ENDS - CRIMP SLEEVE AND CUT OFF EXCESS WIRE S. PULL BASE SOCKET OVER END OF WIRE5 AS FAR A5 POSSIBLE 5. PRESSURE REGULATOR PER LEGEND 6. COMMON BRICK - 4 REQUIRED 5. BALL VALVE PER IRRIGATION PLAN USE TEFLON TAPE 6. COMMON BRICK - 4 REQUIRED ON ALL MALE PIPE ALL SLEEVE. TO BE 5CN 40 PYL. 512E ALL SLEEVES PER SLEEVINb CHART ON PLANS. EXTEND SLEEVES 12" BEYOND ED&E OF HARDSCAFE ON BOTH 6. PUSH 5EALINS PLUS INTO BASE + ,S ET 1. PUSH WIRES TO END OF BASE 50CKET TO INSURE COMPLETE SEALING OF CONNECTION 1. PVC MAINLINE FROM POL -PER LEGEND b. PVC MAINLINE TO SYSTEM - PER LEOENO T. SLH 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER - 2 REQUIRED THREADS. 6. MAINLINE PIPING PER IRRIGATION PLAN ENDS RECLAIMED WATER SLEEVES TO EE MINIMUM 42 " -40" REEF (OR PER WATER DISTRICT STANDARDS) WHERE APPLICABLE. 6. COMPLETED WATERPROLP WIRE CONNECTION P. VALVE SOX EXTENSIONS AS REOUIRED 1/2" IN TURF AREAS, 2" IN SHRUB AREAS 4. VALVE BOX ENTENSION(5) AS REQUIRED I/2" IN'NRF AREAS AND 2" IN SHRUB AREAS E- Sleeving B Wire Connector G Pressure Regulator H Ball Valve FE ' �� Irrigation Details ReoNSRwEO onTE ReReNCCS onTE BENCHMARK SCALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT neYas vn APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO. PLANSPREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION Of xnsD., RECOMMENDED APPROVEDNOSCA. EY_ -- SYI--- _ _ PLAN ORAwiNO FOR 714E GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION L-B ---_._.... -- TEL:..- - --- --_ o TEL IRRIGANON DESAILB I. BHEET 6 OF 15 PROJECT NO, I. FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREAS �% I - - - - -- U' 2. RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH CAST IRON DOVER. BOX TO BE PEALED AT RIGHT ANGLE TO HARDSCAPE ' NOTE. 3. FINISHED GRADE IN SHRUB AREAS _ FINISH bRADE 2.DEV GE SEE LEGEND F WYE STRAINER OR PRF551 RE REWLATOR 19 4, 24" WIRE LOOP B BBALL VALVE TYP. HORLZONTAL PIPING OR ON THE DOWJSTREAM 5. VALVE ID TAG - - 4. MIN. 4° TYP. LEG A5 SPACE PERMITS. =M- 6. THE'. ELL 5CH 60 PVC EVE, 5. BRAT ELL, a REWIRED 6. BACKFLOW ENCLOSURE IF SPECIFIED fANORETE SLAB SHALL BE MINIMUM 4" THICK, IS', '!. CONTROL VALVE 5 BRICK SUPPORTS I. WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER - MOUNT PER MANUFACTURER T. � STRAINER IF SPECIFIED WIDE ANp EXTEND AT LEAST B" BELOW PAST THE BACKFIDW ASSEMBLY PIPING. IF 9, SLH 80 PVC NIPPLE TYP. 3. LOCKING NUT B. ELECTRICAL , TION BOX B. BRA°A UNION, 3 REWIRED BACKFLOW ENCLOB.RE 19 9PECIflED q. BRg95 RIS£RS LENGTH AS REq. IN THE LEGEND THE CONCRETE SLAB SHALL 8E 10. IRRIGATION MAINLINE II, SUi. 80 UNION 4. 120V WIRES IN RIGID CONWIT PER LOCAL CODES 5. RIGID CONWIT FOR COMMON / CONTROL WIRES wC MAINLINE TO MASTER VALVE 1HE 512E REWIRED BY'ME MANUFAGTLRER. o SCH 00wG FEMALE ADAPTER 12. FEMALE ADAP, SCH. 80 PVC 6. SWEEP ELL - 5128 A5 REWIRED 1. FINISH 6RA.DE (FLOOR SURFACE FOR INDOOR MWNT) 5cH eo we NIPPLE B" MIN. 13� CONCRETE SLAB, 9L BaOW 3 IS. LATERAL ' MOUNT CONTROLLER AT "EYE- LEVEL" (� /- 5' -0 ") 14. we MAINLINE I Remote Control Valve J Wall Mount Controller K Baclzilow Device LA 10 I PRESSURE COMPENSATING SCREEN LEGEND 'I GPM of 02 03 04 06 09 25 I I0!5 26 3 STANDARD AND SMALL RADIU5 SPRAY PATTERN5 AND UMBRELLA 5UBBLER5 Im �H efypE eE� �fRGY� LJ F" EPr PRE= a � RE6 _ o Irrigation Details e.a _ -- - N FENEry Es P NE a+s �DA once BENCHMARK SCALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - - - -c: o Msan q" __ APPROVALS .CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DRAWING NO. PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APPROVED lANOSCPPE PUN ORAWINGPDR -- BY. THEYPAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION oniE: Nns zmi er L -7 _ - - - -- DATE DATE IRRIGATION 'DETAILS 6 F=- CALC'S. .- - -- _ + - "'_ WORK PRaECT rvD. SHEET.? OF t5 12F - - 3 5 - I2TG - - -- 2 - 3 -9 5 1 10 12 R ___ -..... 127 - -_- 2 _ -4 5 -.. b II ®_ CON ... 12H.. _ - - -. 4.' 0 - -. 10 127 __.. Z' 6 - -_0 10 12® _ - - -. 120.__ -_.. 3' B 10' 124 ISTQ__ 6 8 ISiT- 4 5 6 B' 12 - - 1ST - 3 _. 6 8 12 IS'® 159... -2 5 11 12 15® - -'�2 1550 - - - - X 12 -9X10 14'X 14' 16x16 20 X 30 23x25' _ 11557 _. - -- 9X19 9x24 9X50 _ 1555T - 4' X 12 4'x 224 X 26 4 X 30' 4X40 15557_ -.. -.- 4' % 16 4 % 24' 4'X 26 4X30.'. ISEST SCREENS /PCBpDi DENOiEB d vARIABt _- An BOVE CABLE /Ea 4'X 14' 4'X.15 4'X20' SPRAY HEADS AND BiREAn CABLE /s to BE UBED TO PCB SCREEN WYtBE CdoALCC PEA- oa'fANCE Ali f0 BUBBLERB a PSI. OPER4ii,G AFE 70 USE pIILE AND c4tE RECO."mIENDED P�BBI/RE PRE9A'PrS RADIiIB OAEdDU COYPEN96TUVYi HEAD 04 NO2ILE/ BC�PN H TO l0 P91. RAN'+E Im �H efypE eE� �fRGY� LJ F" EPr PRE= a � RE6 _ o Irrigation Details e.a _ -- - N FENEry Es P NE a+s �DA once BENCHMARK SCALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - - - -c: o Msan q" __ APPROVALS .CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DRAWING NO. PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APPROVED lANOSCPPE PUN ORAWINGPDR -- BY. THEYPAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION oniE: Nns zmi er L -7 _ - - - -- DATE DATE IRRIGATION 'DETAILS 6 F=- CALC'S. .- - -- _ + - "'_ WORK PRaECT rvD. SHEET.? OF t5 \\ I C A I V V SPECIFICATIONS (4) MANUFACTURER SHALL MARK DATE OF EXTRUSION ON PIPE, 1, PLAN DATING TO BE PERFORMED IN CONJUNCTION WITH RECORDS HELD BY MANUFACTURER COVERING QUALITY CONTROL A. THE PLAN 15 DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT E TO BE LOCATED IN PLANTING AREAS AND NOT IN PAVED AREAS, TESTS, RAW MATERIAL BATCH NUMBER AND OTHER INFORMATION DEEMED NECESSARY EIM MANUFACTURER UNLESS INDICATED OTHER 5E ON THE PLANS.. REFER TO (5) ALL SOLVENT SHALL BE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE NOTES, DETAILS, AND LEGENDS TO VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. MANUFACTURER OF PIPE FITTING AND AS APPROVEG USE NO SOLVENT FROM CANS WHICH HAVE REMAINED OPENED B. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS AND OVERNIGHT. THEIR INSTALLATION TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE SYSTEM IN B. FITTINGS ACCORDANCE WITH PLANE AND SPECIFICATION$. (1) PLASTIC FITTING: PVC, TYPE I, IP6 SCHEDULE 40, NSF C. ALL PRESSURE LINES, NON - PRESSURE LINES, VALVES AND APPROVED ON ALL PRESSURE LINES. MISCELLANEOUS SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL BE MANUFACTURED, SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE (2) PVC TYPE I, IP5 SCHEDULE 40, NSF APPROVED ON ALL SPECIFICATIONS DETAILED IN THE HEREIN MENTIONED NON - PRESSURE LINES IRRIGATION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. (3) COUPLINGS SHALL BE MADE FROM EXTRUDED STOCK, D. SUBSTITUTION OF MATERIALS SIZES OR MANUFACTURERS WILL REAMED WITH A TAPER NOT BE ALLOWED UNLE55 THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AGREE TO ANY PROPOSED CHANGES IN WRITING, (4) ALL PLASTIC FITTINGS: A MOLDED FITTING, B THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL ANY b. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE - SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 ASTM, AI2 _DT EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN ON PLANS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT CONDITIONS EX15T THAT WERE NOT EVIDENT. AT THREADED, COUPLED, AND HOT DIP GALVANIZED. PIPE FITTINGS .SHALL BE HEAVY PATTERN, BANDED, GALVANIZED MALLEABLE THE TIME THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED- ANY SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE T COPPER PIPE - SHALL BE SEAMLESS TYPE K, HARD DRAWN TUBING. OWNERS AUTHORIZED. REPRESENTATIVES PRIOR TO ANY WORK OR THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME ALL 8, STANDARD IRRIGATION COMPONENTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY FIELD CHANGES DEEMED NECESSARY q PRESSURE REGULATOR: SHALL BE MANUFACTURED OF BRASS OR BY THE OWNER BRONZE, AND SHALL BE CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING A COLD F. THE SYSTEM 15 DESIGNED FOR THE MINIMUM OPERATING WATER WORKING PRESSURE OF 150 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH, PRESSURE AS SHOWN AT EACH POINT OF CONNECTION, THE EACH PRE55URE REGULATOR SHALL BE PRESET TO OPERATE AT MAXIMUM DEMAND OF GALLONS PER MINUTE 15 AS SPECIFIED, THE PRE5SURE INDICATED ON PLANS. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE AVAILABLE LATER PRESSURE. ON THE SITE PRIOR TO THE START OF WA- B. ANGLE CONTROL VALVES: FED. SPEC. WW -v -51, CLASS A. 6TALLATIQN. HEAVY DUTY TYPE BRONZE OR BRA55 WITH UNION. VALVE 6HALL BE FITTED WITH A REMOVABLE BEAT DISC, MANUALLY G. THE ACTUAL LOCATION FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE OPERATED AND 5HALL BE PROVIDED WITH ROUND PLASTIC BA FLOW PREVENTER AND THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER IS TO SCHEDULE SO, PVC VALVE BOXE6. 51ZE AS REQUIRED, BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE OWNERS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND /OR THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. C CHECK VALVES: 51FALL BE THE SPRING ACTION TYPE CAPABLE OF WITHSTANDING A WORKING PRESSURE OF 115 POUNDS PER u. 120 VOLT ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCE TO BE PROVIDED BY SQUARE INCH, OTHERS TO THE LOCATION FOR THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER. D. VALVE BOXES: ONE PIECE PLASTIC WITH LOCKING GREEN IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL PLASTIC GOVER.HARKED WITH 'IRRIGATION'. PROVIDE BRICK UI CONNECTION TO EQPMENT. SUPPORTS, ONE UNDER EACH CORNER OF BOX, 2. SPACING OF SPRINKLER HEADS SPRINKLER HEADS: SHALL BE OF TYPE AND MODEL AS SPACING OF SPRINKLER HEADS AND LOCATIONS OF VALVES - "AND INDICATED IN THE LEGEND AND 5HALL BE INSTALLED AS VACUUM BREAKERS 5HALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWIN35 WITH INDICATED ON DETAILED DRAWINGS CONSIDERATION BEING GIVEN TO PREVAILING WIND CONDITIONS. F. BALL VALVES 2' IN SIZE AND SMALLER: 5HALL BE BRONZE, 3. QUANTITIES 5DREW'ED, 150 LB S. WOG, WITH STAINLESS STEEL LEVER FOROPERATION. EACH VALVE SHALL BE HOUSED IN A OUANTITIE5 L15TED ON IRRIGATION LEGEND ARE NOT GUARANTEED BOX AS NOTED ON PLANS. AND ARE FOR CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE ONLY, G. REMOTE CONTROL VALVES AND AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER: SHALL 4. MATERIALS BE PER MODEL AND TYPE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. VALVES SHALL BE WIRED TO CONTROLLER IN SAME NUMERICAL GENERAL: MATERIALS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO THE SEQUENCE AS INDICATED ON PLANS, FOLLOWING ITEMS: ALL PRE55URE SUPPLY LINES, NON-PREEEWRE LINES, VARIOUS TYPES OF VALVES, CONTROLLERS, BACKFLOW PREVENTION UNITS, HOSE BIBB6, AND ALL TYPES OF SPRINKLER S. DIRECT BURIAL CONTROL WIRES HEAD6. ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE NEW, OF A, ALL CONTROL WIRES $HALL BE SOLID COPPER, 600 VOLT, TYPE DOMESTIC MANUFACTURE AND CONFORM TO PERFORMANCE STANDARDS UF, CONFORMING TO THE PROJECT STANDARD SPECIFIC- ON5 AND /OR DATA HEREIN, AND 46 SHOWN IN LEGEND ON DRAWINGS, AND DRAWINGS, SPECIAL PROVISION5, AND THE FOLLOWING INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. WIRE COLORS AND INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS, 5. PL45TIC PIPES AND FITTINGS B. NEUTRAL WIRE6: WHITE (F2 A— DO NOT INTERCONNECT A. PVC PIPE NEUTRAL WIRES BETWEEN CONTROLLERS, C. PILOT WIRES: (N4 AWG. MINIMUM) (1) PRESSURE LINE PIPE 2- AND LARGER SHALL BE CLASS 315 THAN V' TYPE 1120-1220. ET R, S PRESSURE E LE THAN 2' IN SC LINE PIP 55 ER, SHAL_ BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC TYPE D. SPARE WIRES: RED 114 AUG MINIMUM) 1120-1220 RE S PRESSURE LINE F TT NGS SHALL BE TYPE E. WIRE SIZING: CONTROL WIRES SHALL SIZED IN i -II, SCHEDULE 40, NSF APPROVED, CHE NU ACCORDANCE WITH ?HE CONTROLLER MANUFACTURER'S SIZING (2) LATERAL N PIPE $HALL BE CLASS 200 CHART FOR THE DISTANCE OF RUN. -1 LAL TYPE 112m SCHEDULE LATERAL LINE FITTING SHALL BE LATERAL TYPE I -II, SCHEDULE 40, NSF APPROVED. F. VALVE NO, VALVE NO, (3) ALL PLASTIC PIPE SHALL BE CONTINUOUSLY AND STRIPE 2 YELLOW T YELLOW W/BLACK ORANGE S ORANGE 1/BLACK STRIPE PERMANENTLY MARKED WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: MANUFACTURER'S NAME, NOMINAL PIPE SIZE, PVC 1120 3 BLUE 9 RED W /BLACK STRIPE 4 BLACK U0 WHITE W/BLACK STRIPE AND PRESSURE RATING IN P51. 5 BROWN II YELLOW WIRED STRIPE 6 PURPLE 12 WHITE WIRED STRIPE REPEAT SEQUENCE FOR VALVE NUMBERS EXCEEDING THE ABOVE. BENCHMARK I SCALE I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT G- WIRE CONNECTION5: NEUTRAL, PILOT, AND SPARE WIRES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A TOO FOOT (2') COILED EXCESS WIRE LENGTH AT EACH END ENCLOSURE. EACH AND EVERY ARE SPLICE SHALL BE SOLDERED (USING bm -49 SOLDER) TOGETHER, THEN ENCASED IN THE WATERPROOFED EPDXY OF THE 'SCOTCH -PAC' OR 'PEN-TITE' CONNECTORS. WIRE SPLICES SHALL BE MADE ONLY IN VALVE OR PULL BOXES PROVIDE EXPANSION COIL AT EACH VALVE BOX (10 WRAPS AROUND A ' PIPE) H. WIRING SHALL OCCUPY THE SAME TRENCH AND SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE SAME ROUTE A5 PRESSURE SUPPLY LINES WHENEVER POSSIBLE. I. CONTROL WIRES SHALL BE BUNDLED WITH ELECTRICAL TAPE AT MAXIMUM FIVE FOOT INTERVALS, J. TRENCH MARKER: ALL DIRECT BURIAL WIRES SHALL BE MARKED WITH A CONTINUOUS YELLOW COLORED TRENCH MARKER TAPE PLACED NINE INCHES (9') BELOW FINISHED GRADE DIRECTLY ABOVE THE BURIED WIRES, MARKER TAPE SHALL BE EQUAL TO 'ALARMATAPB AS MANUFACTURED BY PAUL POTTER WARNING TAPE, INC. TAPE SHALL BE FOUR INCHES (4') WIDE. im. EXCAVATION A. ALL IRRIGATION PRESSURE LINES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SIX INCH CLEARANCE FROM EACH OTHER, ANY LATERAL LINES AND FROM LINES OF OTHER TRADES, PARALLEL LINES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED DIRECTLY OVER ONE ANOTHER. B SACKFILL SHALL BE FREE OF DEBRIS OR ORGANIC MATERIAL THAT MAY DAMAGE PIPES OR EQUIPMENT, COMPACT SACKFILL TO A DRY DENSITY EQUAL TO ADJACENT UNDISTURBED SOIL IN PLANTING AREAS AND TO SO% PAVED AREAS FINISH GRADE OF SACKPILLED TRENCH SHALL CONFORM TO ADJACENT AREAS. C. PROVIDE MINIMUM COVER OF IS INCHES FOR ALL PRESSURE SUPPLY LINES AND 12 INCHES FOR ALL LATERAL NON - PRESSURE LINES. PROVIDE MINIMUM COVER OF 24 INCHES FOR ALL PIPING UNDER PAVED AREAS WITH SCHEDULE 40 PVC SLEEVES 2 X DIAMETER OF LINE SIZE. D. IF BACKPILL SETTLEMENT OCCURS AND ADJUSTMENTS IN GRADES, IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT, PLANTING, OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ARE NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE REQUIRED REPAIRS WITHOUT COST TO THE OWNER. 11, TESTING THE CONTRACTOR SHAWL NOT ALLOW NOR CAUSE ANY OF His WORK TO BE COVERED UNTIL IT HAS BEEN INSPECTED, TESTED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDER'5/OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. A. PRESSURE TEST (1) NO TESTING SHALL TAKE PLACE, NOR SHALL ANY WATER BE ALLOWED INTO ANY SYSTEM, BEFORE THE SOLVENT MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED CURING TIME HA6 ELAPSED. (2) TEST ALL PRESSURE LINES UNDER HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE OF ONE HUNDRED FIFTY PCUN ,5 PER SQUARE INCH PRIOR TO BACK' LLING TRENCH AND PLANTING OF ALL PLANTS. (3) SUSTAIN PRESSURE IN LINES FOR NOT LESS THAN ONE HOUR IF LEAK5 DEVELOP, REPAIR LEAKING PORTIONS AND REPEAT TE57 UNTIL ENTIRE SYSTEM IS PROVEN WATERTIGHT. (4) TEST SHALL BE OBSERVED AND APPROVED BY OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BACKFILLING TRENCHES. B. COVERAGE TEST (1) WHEN THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS COMPLETED, AND PRIOR TO PLANTING CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM A COVERAGE TEST '.N THE PRESENCE E E OF THE OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DETERMINE THE COVERAGE 15 COMPLETE AND ADEQUATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CORRECT INADEQUACIES OF COVERAGE ONLY WHERE DRAWINGS AND DIRECTION BY OWNER HAVE NOT BEEN FOLLOWED. (2) ADJUST VALVES, ALIGNMENT AND COVERAGE OF ALL SPRINKLER HEADS. (3) A IT {5 DETERMINED THAT ADJUSTMENTS IN THE IRRIGAT'. ON EQUIPMENT WILL PROVIDE PROPER AND MORE ADEQUATE COVERAGE, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ALL NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS PRIOR TO FINALIZING PROJECT. (4) ALL ADJUSTMENTS 5HALL BE MADE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER c. WIRE TEST (1) ALL WIRING SHALL BE TESTED FOR CONTINUITY, OPEN CIRCUITS, AND UNINTENTIONAL GROUNDS PRIOR TO CONNECTING TO EQUIPMENT, THE MINIMUM INSULATION RESISTANCE TO GROUND 6HALL BE FIFTY (50) MEGOHMS. ANY WIRING NOT MEETING THESE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE REPLACED. (2) IF ADDITIONAL WIRE OR TAPE IS NECESSARY, REPEAT COLOR SEQUENCE FROM BEGINNING. 12. MISCELLANEOUS A CONTROLLERS SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED WITH LETTER DESIGNATION AS SHOWN ON PLANS (IE., A, B, C, ETC.), B. INSTALL ONE VALVE PER VALVE BOX ONLY, C ALL QUICK COUPLERS SHALL HAVE YELLOW RUBBER CAPS, C, INSTALL ALL SPRAY HEADS WITH NOZZLES OF THE APPROPRIATE DEGREE OF RADIUS FOR THE AREA TO BE COVERED, ADJUST ALL NOZZLES TO EWYNATE SPRAYING WATER ON BUILDINGS AND HARE -APE- ADJUST ALL VALVE FLOW CONTROLS TO PROVIDE OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AN APPROVED ANTI -DRAINAGE DEVICE FOR ALL LOW HEADS TO ELIMINATE LOW HEAD DRAINAGE AND POSSIBLE SOIL EROSION. E. LABEL ALL VALVE BOXES WITH VALVE DESIGNATION IN STENCILED PAINTED LETTERS V HIGH. F. ALL CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE LABELED WITH THE CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER ON A YELLOW PLASTIC TAG WITH BLACK LETTERS (DAISY TAG OR EQUAL) ATTACH THE SOLENOID WIRES OF VALVE, 13, RECORD PLANS ('AS- BUILTS) CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD PLANS DRAWN ON PRINTS OR REPRODUCIBLES PROVIDED BY THE OWNER THE FOLLOWING 5HALL BE DIMENSIONED FROM TWO PERMANENT POINTS OF REFERENCE 0E. BUILDING CORNERS, 51DEWALKS ETC) POINTS OF CONNECTION GATE VALVES PRESSURE LINE LOCATION CONTROLLERS AND CONTROL VALVES (INCLUDING SOURCE OF POWER) OUICK COUPLERS ROUTING OF ALL DIRECT BURIAL CONTRO'_ WIRE FOR IRRIGATION SIZE AND LOCATION OF IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRE CONDUIT SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL 6LEEVING 14, ACCE55GRIE6 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH THE OWNER THE FOLLOWING MATERIALS UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK: A. A PLASTIC SEALED DIAGRAMMATIC PLAN OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IDENTIFYING STATION NUMBERS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE IRRIGATED AREAS, MOUNT INSIDE EACH CONTROLLER B. TWO KEYS FOR EACH CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE. C. ALL EQUIPMENT GUARANTEES AND OPERATION MANUALS. D. TWO QUICK- COUPLER VALVE KEYS WITH HOSE SWIVEL ELL, 5, NOTE TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, ALL IRRIGATION LINES AND APPURTENANCES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN THE PROPERTY LINE OUTSIDE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND AT NO TIME, WILL AN IRRIGATION LINE CROSS A PUBLIC STREET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. CONTRACTOR $HALL VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL EQUIPMENT PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, 16. PLUMBING PERMIT A SEPARATE PLUMBING IT PERT AND INSPECTION WILL 0E REQUIRED FROM THE BUILDING TE SHOWN DEPARTMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHOUAN ON THESE DRAWINGS. T, GUARANTEE THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR. ANY DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS OR POOR WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE REPLACED OR CORRECTED BY THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. Lai PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF I RECOMMENDED APPROVED DATE'MaN5, 2001 BV'. _, Bv: DATE: DATE le � Gry o 1 U THE GRAUER EOUNDAITION FOR 'EDUCATION L_8 IRRICsATION 6PEC'8 _ wolix Paw[cT NO. SHEET 8 OF 1 A I` IAtC+-f'L INE �F i 10 ® R : PROVIDE 50 -IGAL 3E ENCELIA GALIFORNIGA TO BE FIELD SPOTTED ON SLOPE BY LAND5GAPE ARCH. '• ", .., • EEDED '. ' LAI,NN LAWN PLAY FIELD _ _ ......_.. _ _. /0 ., ' .' '� �•,'_ r/ ® ;k � 000 -. w * —70 -5 GAL ANIGOZANTHOS � FULVITIS DWARF -RED NANRA" HABITAT UNDISTURBED PROTEGTED� ♦. ✓ '' MULCH i �� LAwN `♦ _ + 8 O - 14 -24" BOX ?ODOCARPUS ELONGATA COLUMNS OR LAURUS NOBILIS COLUMNS 2 -24 5OX MA!$NOLIA �� GERAOMEOSED:' ` SEE kNRYDET L ';ROpO�� _ V� rvo Roo — + GERM ES 000CO ITTLE ALIER �.. (N") ` T TYP MULCH g _. .... CB) JA N PROVIDE 50-1 &AL , eawrvoiovER / - ®y ENGELIA GALIFORNIGA TO BE FIELD SPOTTED Y LANDSCAPE ARCH. ' sRaurvoco vc+x spGUs�oveR } d � x SEE SHEET L -12 FORPLANTING LEGEND a NOTES SEE SHEET L -13 II L -14 FOR PLANTING SPECS + „_ SEE SHEET L -15 FOR PLANTING DETAILS n IAI SCALE; 1 " =20' _.._...._.. _.__. NIT .R —__._. s or+s PRDVeD REF es onre BENCHMARK SCALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - O °E � � a— APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO. _._........ VI _.._._..... urvoscnPE PUrvaRnwiNO FOR: pEgN9 PREP hREU UNDER HE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APPROVED r =so' oo, THE CsRAUER FOUNDATION POR EDUCATION -- . _ RY _ L-9 w D-E - -- —E _ LANDSCAPE PLAN WOFX PROJECT. NO. _ .SHEET 9 OF 15 ---------- e9r. 16 SCALE PLAN L-11 FOR TILIE>fAPSA SEE SHORT --12 FOR PLANTING LEGEND 4 NOTES 1:1MR SHEET L.�3 a L-lz FOR PLANTING S1.5 11 0 5�455T L -15 FOR PLANTING DETAILS 1, PIANS PREPARED UNDER THE s ON OF RECOMMENDED AEPRO�D —E DATE: SCALE: I"=2D' THE G;ZAUER rOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION LANDSCAPE PLAN L-10 LIMIT OF WORK 5 GALS' EURYOP_S VIRIDIS 10 EURYOPS I ■T �� I FI 15 GAL' ALYOGYNE HUEGELI 4 BLUE HIBISCUS II L - `.. 'Y - --` -- - -� : - �� I GAL V�`",A1 S- _ CEANOTHUS GRISEUS HORIZONTALES W/ MULCH UNDER CARMEL CREEPER 5 GAL.4L-EONOTIS LEONURUS �' 26" 8 1 LIONS TAIL �"- ---- ® ® ®... POURED CONC. 20, -�` 6X6XIO -10 WIRE �.� CAP 3"X26," I GAL ROSMARINU$ PROSTRATA I& ROSEMARY - -'-'- _ BEAT WALL L 4 - w �A A - // ij 12 r— CL IA 5 GAL W/ MU 1111PIOLEISIS UNDER - + -TOM ROCK VENEER 2(D O MATCH BLDG 38 RAPHIOLEPSIS n k /x, ,AA A �A V A A , -w 2 O.G. HE BRIO DAYLILYYBRIDA_ —_ ,� \/ % QUERCUS ILEX 244 BOX HOLLY OAK - - ° Ii "d,� - - ---■ ■ PROPOSED BLDCz. ..<< "'� SEAT WALL DETAIL. NTS. ■ � SEE ARCH ITECT'� PLANS ■ ■ LAiUN ' - II I, �y - r " 15 GAL CAMELLIA JAPONICA ESPALIER 5 GAL 4 _- .....�- CAMELLIA NO_ELLII 6 _ GREVILLEA ,S H£MEROCALLIS HYBRID - - --- 0 5 GA_L NILE CRANE" _----- '— - - "-- -- 26 HYBRID DAYLILY - 24" BOXI MICHELLIA DOLTSOPA 1 MICHELLIA ROSMARINUS OFFIGINALIS 5 GAL 'J TUSCAN BLUE - ''e ZEALAND 7 R05MARY --__ " ��- --�""- 39AL NEWO FLAXMS'__ GHRONDROPETALUM 5 GAL TECTORUM / ` ' A 5 G L ADI AN_TIFO _I;Z.MOHRA _R'IS 3 P LEATH£ RLEAF FE RN c" roe it . ... ...... ......... I LIM OF WORK IS GALJERIOBOTRYA DEFLEXA ESPALIER I (BRONZE LOQUAT 241;. 5 GAL STRELIT IA EGINEA OX OUERCUS AGRIFOLIA OAK +'"`r 38 BIRD OF PARADISE I COAST LIVE OAK IBOUGANVILLEA I GA BEI IA CORDIFOLIES, 5 GAL'ggN plEl,�O RED" 5 GAL RHOICISSUS CAPENSI$ _ 56 HEART LEAF BERGENIA 2 IBOUGANVILLEA 6 EVERGREEN GRAPE ~ =aR ",F. =• �` ,�..,y I "SAN DIEGO RED" aevlsiows APaaoveo once aEFeaewces onrE BENCHMARK SCALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF3pNEOev Msaa" - °`° °" roNE M. u.v APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO. - - - - -" - - ---- ------ - - -- -- o roww I- IIT PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF DATE Na spo+ RECOMMENDED ay:_. APPROVED Dr -_ LANDSCAPE --1. FOR: THE GRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION BATE: LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANTOGO INGULARIE PLANTAIN OQ 1O- NEA5TER PARNEY GOTONEA5TER 5 gal 38 515YRINCHIUM BELLUM BLUE -EYED 6RA55 M MIMULUS PUMOEUS MISSION RED MONKEYFLOWER ATRIPLEX 5EMI5AGGATA ® 2E ACRE GREEPIN6 SALT BUSH RHUS INTE6REF0LIA LEMONADE BERRY 5 gal 20 RC- COMMENDED APPLICATION RATE: 45 LBS /ACRE. SEE SHEET L -14 FOR APLIGATION 5PEGIFIGATION. 4' GEANOTHU5 LOYGE COULTER CALIFORNIA LILAC 5 gal 104 LANDSCAPE AREA SUMMARY R05EMARINU5 OFFIGINALIS R05EMARINU5 5 gal 87 ' " " -- TUSCAN BLUE DESCRIPTION AREA e ANISOZANTH05 MANSUE511 5 gal TO .TOTAL SITE AREA _— — 199,655 SF " DWARF- RED * TOTAL SITE LANDSCAPED AREA = _— _._- 51,120 SP 26 FE PODOGARFUS ELON6ATA COLUMNS IS gal 14 TOTAL SITE PARKING AREA = .— ____304'19 SF IN/ MULCH UNDER OR TOTAL SITE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPED = -2,7tC SP —14 LAURU5 N051LI5 COLUMNS « DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY PLANTS SHOWN ON SHEET L -11 *UNDISTURBED AREA NOT INCLUDED Planting Le encl a„ ._. -. -- - - .. . -- -" - - " -T -T tea'°""= APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO. — ._.— _ orvs PROVes Dare 'xcss are. BENCHMARK SCALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E -r �syA� Av - __ _.. _ - -.. " -- UNOSCAPE PtANOMW NG FOR - PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APPROVED _ m „_ —_ _ a: - THE C�RAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION L 12 LANDSCAPE LEGEND _ E. —_— .. -SHEET 12 OF 15 TREES (3ROUNaCOVERB —._ -- SYMBOL: BOTANICAL /COMMON NAME. 812E aTTY. OYMBOL: BOTANICAL /COMMON NAME SIZE REMARKS aTTY. 115TANIA CONPERTA 111,45BANE BOX 15911 13 e/lLt�d R05MARINU5 PR05TATA LOGKNOOD DE FOREST flats 2' o,G. PHORMIUM TENAX RUBRUM MAROON FLAX Igal 2 0 45 ROSMARINU5 MAJORCA PINK PINK ROSEMARY 1 gai 3' o.a. 52 OUERCU5 ILEX HOLLY OAK 15 gal;_ 4 per tree �'�^^^'`-^'-�ma'��y, 5TATIGE WL6ARE DWARF STATICS flats 24' o.c. 24' 20 4 � d FESTUCA OVINA 6LAUGA SHEEP FESCUE ats o.a. COVER SOIL W/ 3/4" PEA ROCK AFPROX I" DEEP AROUND PLANTS 24' o a LA6Eft5TROEMIA INDIGA GRAPE MYRTLE IS gal 6 0 TUSCARORA STANDARDS LAWN HYDROSEED MIX - AGROTEG SEDD CO BALLFIELD MIX - 34 ® 8 # PER THOUSAND 50. FT. TRISTA LAURINA TRISTANIA IS gal 27 10 % BERMUDA SHORTS IMPROVED BERMUDA OR OR MIGHELLIA DOL75OPA MIGHELLIA 15 gal 10 % OMEGA III PERENNIAL RYE = 05 % MIDNIGHT KENTUCKY BLUE 6RA55 1 20 % HULLED BERMUDA COMMON VARIETY A PINU5 TORREYANA TORREY PINE 15 ga1 21 40 % EIRE5T PERENNIAL RYE SILENT r KENTUCKY BLUE 6RA55 —� PLANT ALL 5L0 E5 W/ DELOSPERMA ALBA 0 12" O.G. FROM FLATS OUERGU5 A&RIFOLIA CALIFORNIA LIVE OAK 36" BOX TREES I PLANT ALL REAR SLOPES W/ BAGGHARIS PILULARI5 "TWIN PEAKS" ® 2'11C, FROM FLATS u PLANT ALL DEL05PERMA SLOPES W/ 6AZANIA 5PLENDEN5 ® 2' O G. 30% OF ARENA. vINES SLOES OR DISTURBED AREA AROUND PARKING LOTS OR OTHER AREA H L SYMBOL: BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ally. BE HYDR05EEDED W/ IRRIGATED OR NON IRRIGATED MIX 2200. WOOD FIBER MAGNOLIA 6RANDIFLORA 'LITTLE GEM' ESPALIER 15 gal 2 COASTAL SAGE SCRUH MIX BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME .g, HRUBS ENGELIA GALIFORNIGA BUSH SUNFLOWER SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME _ __ - - -s 812E aTTY. -- _ -- ESCHS CALIFORNIGA CALIFORNIA POPPY S GOPARIUS DEERWEED LON 5COF LASTHENIA 6LABRATA GOLDFIELDS 51 LUPINUS SUGCULENTUS ARROYO LUPINE U GI5T05 PURPUREU5 PURPLE ROCK ROSE. 1 gal GOLLINSIA HETEROPHYLLA CHINESE HOUSES ERIODIl --ON GRA551FOLIUM THICK -LEAF YERBA SANTA WISTRINGIA ROSMARINUS V415TRIN6IA 5 gal 95 ERIOPHYLLUM GONFERTIFLORUM 60LDEN YARROW OENOTHERA CHEIRANTHIFOLIA BEACH EVENING PRIMROSE HETEROMELE5 ARBUTIFOLIA CALIFORNIA TOYON 19.1 58 SALVIA APIANA WHITE SAGE PLANTOGO INGULARIE PLANTAIN OQ 1O- NEA5TER PARNEY GOTONEA5TER 5 gal 38 515YRINCHIUM BELLUM BLUE -EYED 6RA55 M MIMULUS PUMOEUS MISSION RED MONKEYFLOWER ATRIPLEX 5EMI5AGGATA ® 2E ACRE GREEPIN6 SALT BUSH RHUS INTE6REF0LIA LEMONADE BERRY 5 gal 20 RC- COMMENDED APPLICATION RATE: 45 LBS /ACRE. SEE SHEET L -14 FOR APLIGATION 5PEGIFIGATION. 4' GEANOTHU5 LOYGE COULTER CALIFORNIA LILAC 5 gal 104 LANDSCAPE AREA SUMMARY R05EMARINU5 OFFIGINALIS R05EMARINU5 5 gal 87 ' " " -- TUSCAN BLUE DESCRIPTION AREA e ANISOZANTH05 MANSUE511 5 gal TO .TOTAL SITE AREA _— — 199,655 SF " DWARF- RED * TOTAL SITE LANDSCAPED AREA = _— _._- 51,120 SP 26 FE PODOGARFUS ELON6ATA COLUMNS IS gal 14 TOTAL SITE PARKING AREA = .— ____304'19 SF IN/ MULCH UNDER OR TOTAL SITE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPED = -2,7tC SP —14 LAURU5 N051LI5 COLUMNS « DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY PLANTS SHOWN ON SHEET L -11 *UNDISTURBED AREA NOT INCLUDED Planting Le encl a„ ._. -. -- - - .. . -- -" - - " -T -T tea'°""= APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO. — ._.— _ orvs PROVes Dare 'xcss are. BENCHMARK SCALE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E -r �syA� Av - __ _.. _ - -.. " -- UNOSCAPE PtANOMW NG FOR - PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF RECOMMENDED APPROVED _ m „_ —_ _ a: - THE C�RAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION L 12 LANDSCAPE LEGEND _ E. —_— .. -SHEET 12 OF 15 PLANTING SPEGIPIGATIONS :GENERAL A 4 CITY INSPEOTOR, SNTRACTOR SHALL BE ON THE 51TE WHEN INSPEOTONS ARE MADE, REQUESTE FOR RNSPEOT OMS 5HALL BE MADE AT LEAST 40 .HOURS IN ADVANO F THE WORK 15 NOT READY FOR NSPEOTION WHEN THE NSPECTOR A CONTRACTOR 5HALL PAY FOR THE EN6 NEER'S VISIT AT OURRENT OITY RATE.. REpU1RED BY THE ENGINEER PER NSPECTION JOB LARD. O — -- COMPLETED WITHOUT PROPER INSPECTION BY SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER OR CITY. WHERE APPLICABLE 2. TUTEE ES (5 GALLON AND LARGER) SHALL BE vUARA.NTEED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR, ALL SHRUBS AND OTHER PLANT MATCRi45 SHALL A ALL ARANT TH FOR A PERIOD OF 90 CALENDAR DAYS. ALL GUARANTEE PERIODS OMMENCE FROM THE TIME O' FINAL AOEPTANCE BY THE ENGINEER AT THE COMPLETION O THE 90 CALENDAR DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD. B. REPLACE, AS SOON A5 'WEATHER PERM T5, LL DEAD PLANTS NOT TN V160ROU5 GDNDITION AS NOTED MRIN6 THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, PLANTS USED FOR REPLACEMENTS 5HALL BE SAME KIND AND —E AS ORIGINALLY PLANTED... THEY 5HALL BE FURN SHED PLANTED AND --R 1 - A FI- GUARANTEED THESE DOOUMENTS. PLANTIN65PEOIFOATION PRODUCTS I. MATERIALS A OPEOIL:. EXISTING SOIL ON THE SITE SHALL BE USED AS TOPSOIL FOR PLANTING PJRP05E5 WHEN POSSIBLE BUT SHALL BE FREE OF DEBRIS ER FOREI6N MATTER. OONTAMINATED SOIL 5HALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ACCEPTABLE EXISTING SOIL OR ORTED -IL OTHER 1 IMPORTS SOIL SHALL BE SANDY TEXTURED. SILT PLUS CLAY CONTENT OF THIS SOIL 5HALL BE NOT 6REATER THAN IS% BY SATURATION ITRRAANGT OTHE-NSODIUM ASSOOIRMTO RAATTI0 9A SAHTBAINL NOAT IE GEE SO MILLMNOSSPER CE IMEYLR AT 25 DE&REES C. II IN ORDER TO ENSURE —IRMANOE, SAMPLES OF THE IMPORTED 'AIL SHALL BE °SUBMITTED TO AN A5RONOMIO SOILS TES T— LABORATORY, APPROVED BY THE EXSINEER.OR LANDSCAPE ARCH FOR ANLY515 PRIOR TO USE RE5ULT5 IF TSETINS SHLL BE DELIVERED TO THE E-N61NE-ER OR LANDSCAPE ARCH. FOR APPROVAL. 501L TEST TO INCLUDE ANLYSI5 AND RE MMENDATIONS. B. - D—SERS AND 501L OPNDITOM R5: 1, R6ANIO AMENDMENT 5HALL BE REDWOOD SHAVIN&S 5GOTT5 AMENDMENT OR TERRA BLEND BY TERRA PRODUCTS OF SL_ AMON 450ESS6 ANTB 5 MILLIINOHE P xOGNTIMETERR AT 25 DEGREES G ASOMEASURED BY SATURATION E NxTRAOT ONOUCTIVITY.N RCIAL FERTILIZER 5HALL HAVE A MINIMNN OF 16% NITROGEN, 6% PHOSPHORIO ACID, AND 5% POTASH. DELIVER HOARD SAME, MARKED WITH 1YE —, ANALY515 AND NAME O MANUFACTURER. K LZER IN DRY STORAGE FUSE IN IST15 -15 FERTILIZER AND AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZER DURING SCHOOL SEASON — INS EFERTILIZER X- FORT L� SHALE BE COMMERCIAL 6RADE- MANUFAOTIURED BY BEST OR EQUAL, 111, PLANT TABLETS SHALL BE T &RAM SIZE,. —FORM OR EQUAL C. SOIL CONDITIONER: I. PELLETIZED GYPSUM - BEST 'SOILBUSTER' W/IRON OREQUL. ALANT MATERIALS D I. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE HEAL— WELL - DEVELOPED REPRESENTATIVES OF THEIR SPECIES OF VARIETIES FREE FROM ESF6UREMENT WITH WELL DEVELOPED BRANOH AND ROOT SYSTEMS, AND —IIFOATION OF NURSERY INSPECTION THAT PLANTS ARE FREE FROM ALL PLANT DISEASES AND INSECT INFESTATION it AN OORDANCE AI TAND.ARD5 OF PRACTICE REOMME IESE BY AMERICAN AS:_ ATI ON 0, NNURSER ITMEH NAME III. SIZE N ZONTAINERS FOR AT�LE 5X CONTAINERS MONTHS,B01UM' .TOT OVERNT NO THE FLANTIN6 PLAN (2) YEARS, E-ELDS E ALLEBE55HOWN TO STALL THAT NO ROOT -BOUND CONDITIONS PREVAIL. NO ONTAINER PLANTS THAT HAVE CRACKED OR BROKEN BALL5 OF EARTH, WHEN TAKEN FROM CONTAINERS 5HALL BE PLANTED, EXOEPT UPON SPEOIFlO APPROVAL. I V. DO NOT PRUNE, PRIOR TO DELIVERY, EXOEPT BY OPEOIFC APPROVE. SONDT—, LATENT DEFECTS AND V. PLANTS SHLL BE SUBJECT AT IN Y TIME FOR ORR, DURING VARIETY, 11 OF WORK. REMOVE REJEGTEDEPLANTS FROMOTHE PROW SECT sI.E IMMEO1.i,Ei-Ell ro IaEPLnceYrTwiTH n.c��PrnBLe MATERIAL. VI. PROTECT ALL PLANTS FROM DAMAGE BY SUN, WINO OR RAIN AT ALL TIMES BEFORE PLANTIN6, NOT BE PERMITTED; EXOEPT, WHEN PROOF IS SUBMITTED THAT ANY PLANT SPEOP ED IS NOT OBTAINABLE. O54 WILLS CON$JESTIT FOR USE OF THE NEAREST EQUIVALENT IN SIZE OR VARIETY WITH AN EQUITABLE ONTRAGT PRICE LL $UB5TINTONS WILL BE SIBJEOT TO THE ENGINEER'S 4 CITY INSPECTOR OR LANDSCAPE ARCHI. EGT AS FAPPLO-1 APPROVE. VIII. P ALL HAVE GROWN UNDER ON—O CONDITIONS COMPARABLE TO THOSE OF THE PROJECT SITE, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECUFOLLY APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. I. GROUND COVERS WILL BE HAND PLANTED IN THE AREAS INDICATED N THE PLANTN6 PLANS, 11 D COVER PLANTS SHALL BE GROWN IN FLAT PLANTS OR PEAT POT5 AS INDICATED ON THE PLANT415T FLAT GROWN PLANTS (ROOTED 6UTTIN65) 5HALL REMAIN IN FLATS UNTIL TRANSPLANTING. THE SOIL IN THE RAT 5HALL CONTAIN SUFFOIENT MOISTN:E 7 AIL T FALL APART WHEN LIFTING THE PLANS. PLANTS FROM FEAT POTS ARE USED, THE PEAT POTS SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES PRIOR TO PLANTIN6 TO PREVENT UNNECESSARY DRYING O THE ROT BALL. 111 —0 D EIR5 EE PLANTED IN A TRIANGULAR PATTERN EVENLY SPACED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN. PLANT GROUND COVERS CONTINUOUSLY UNDER ALL TREES AND 5HRUB5 IN THE AREAS DE516NATEO ON THE PLANTIN6 PLANS. PLANT 1 '_H ENSURE MINIMUMDISTVRBA -S AITH OF ITS THE ROOOT 9YSTEM� AMOUNT ND SMOOTH PLANNOTINS AREAAAFTER IN A P ANTN6i O PROVIDE AN THAT V EVEN, SMOOTH, FINAL FINISH GRADE. TO AVOID DRYING OUT PLANTINGS SHL BE IMMEDIATELY AATERED AFTER PLANTIN6 UNTIL THE E-RE AREA IS SOAKED TO THE FULL DEPTH OF EACH HOLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWING. F TREE TIES -. NCH TIES FOR DOUBLE- STAKING AND TRIPLE STAKING, OR EOUL AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SEOURE TREE TO STAKE IN TWO PLACES MINIMUM. 6. TREE STA (2 - 2 INDH DIAMETER x 10 FOT LONG LO E BOLE KR LL FIVE E ON AND 24 INOH BOX THE USE 5 LO6EPOLE PINE STAKES (TRIPLE 5 KE) O ALL TREE5 SO INZH BOX SIZE AND R6ER. TREE KE SHLL M FINE AND POINTED AT ONE END PANEL BAR CRS: N FEET ON5 CENTERE N THE TREE TRUNK ('DEEP -ROOT' OR APR A APPROVED EO L) A B SURFACE I M- O P PE CATONS:EXECUT I INSTALLATION AITE - EARANUE,,BR—AN NDRIBB REMOVE FROM OM THE E FLA6NT RKREAS WEEDS AND GRASSES, INOLUDIN6 ROOTS AND ANT MINOR 5, STORAGE. FERMI551ON FROM THE CITY OR OWNER TO STORE PLANTS ON THE PROJECT 511, AND ENSURE THAT THEY ARE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE BY THE SUN, WIND, AND CONSTRUCTION WORK. FNI GRADING OF PLANTIN6 AREAS 6RAOIN6 SHALL BE DONE I. DO NOT WORK ON THE SOIL WHEN MOISTURE CONTENT 15 SO 6 11 REMOVE AND El— OF ALL SOL IN CONCRETE, 6ASOL NE PAN SOLVENT5 —1- -, REMOAREAS & THE 50 �TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 5 XB(b) N-5 OR TP THE LSVBLL OF DRYNESS IN THE AFFECTED Al— THE AFFEOT£D SOIL 5HALL BE REPLACED WITH NATIVE OR IMPORTED SOIL A5 REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR 5HALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMI -C TO INSTALLED PANTS OAUSED BY SUGH —ANOCS. . III F A TO BE LANDSCAPED 15 NOT ACCEPTABLE TO THE CONTRACTOR THE ONTRPCTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OR ANDELAPE ARCHITECT, IN WRITING. RAOIN6, LOOSEN LL. PLANTING AREAS TO A DEPTH OF 51X (IS INCHES. FINISH 5RADE5 SHALL ALLOW FOR OADDITION OFO SOIL NONDITIONERS, V. MAKE MINOR GRADE ADJJ5TMENiS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER VI WHERE DE516NATED DRAINA6E MEETS AN OBSTRUCTION, WARP 6RADE5 SO THAT NO WATER COLLECTS. VII. USE WATER TRUCKS AND 5PRINKLERS AS REQUIRED TO OONTROLALL AIRBORNE DUST CAUSED BY GRADING OPERATIONS. VIII. FINISH 6RADIN6 ALL PLANTIN6 AREAS TO A SMOOTH AND EVEN CONDITION, MAKING CERTAIN THAT NO WATER POCKETS OR E5 REMAIN REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL FOREIGN MATERIALS CLOD5 AND ROCKS OVER I INOH IN DIAMETER WITHIN ES OF SURFACE. AREAS AND 2 IR"NDGH BELOW FOR SHRUB ATREEAS ELOPIN6 TO DRAIN TO AD BELOA THE ROADWAT, — NNBSWLE- OR CATCH 6A51N A. N6 AREAS WITH A GRADE OF 5:1 OR LE55. INCORPORATE EVENLY INTO THE TOP 6 INOH OF EXI5TIN& SOIL (WITH A ROTOTILLER OR APPROVED P SE OF EQUIPMENT THE FOLLOWING PER EAOH 1-0 5OUARE FEET OF PLANTIN6 AREA B_ FROM THE FINE THESE —NOTIONNO SHALL BE IL BIS AGNL PURPOSES -11, SOIL —NNDITIONIIN6L TAKES TEL.— THEREFORE, THETC N LTRACTDR SHLL OBTAIN SOIL SAMPLES AT A RATE OF ONE PER EVERY 25000 SQUARE FEET OF PANTED AREA IN THE PRESENCE O THE ENGINEER Oft LANDSOAPE ARCHITECT. TM - CONDUCTED BY AN APPROVED AGRONOMIC SOIL5 TESTING LABORATORY APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, COPIES OF THE E501LLTEST SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING THE PRE -SITE MEETING AND VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. — T TOR SHL ADD AMENDMENTS PER SOIL5 REPORT. REOOMMENOATION5 FOR INDIVIDUAL PLANTIN6 AREAS AND AS APPROVED BY THE '. E6ENEER. C. AL_ ROCKS OR UNBROKEN SOIL CLODS OVER I INOH IN DIAMETER BROUGHT TO THE SURFACE SHALL SE REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT SITE 1, 5. WEED ONTROL PROGRAM. UPON OOMPLE-TION OF THE SOIL A—XHEN INSTALLATION AND FINE 6RADIN6 WORK PERFORM WEED —TROL MEASURES A5 FOLLOWS: 1. IRRIGATE ALL AREAS DESIGNATED TO BE PLANTED FOR SEVEN DAYS AT A SCHEDULE REGVIRED TO GERMINATE ALL WEED SEED POSSIBLE, 11, APPLY WEED KILLER PER MAWJFPCTURERS REOMMENDATION AND THE —NEER'5 APPROVAL AND ALLOW EFFICIENT TIME FOR COMPLETE KILL OF ALL GERMINATED WEEDS III. REPEAT STEP ONE ABOVE. IV REPEAT STEP TWO ABOVE. 4. PLANTIN6 STALL BE COMPETED AS FOLLOWS. A. DETERMINE L-1—OF THE TREES AND SHRUBS BY SOLING FROM THE PLANTIN6 PLAN, B. SPOT CONTAINERS, AND OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER OR ANDBCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE EXCAVATING PLANTIN6 PITS. ''1 C XCAVATE PLANING FITS WITH VERTIOAL SIDES FOR ALL PANTS. SHRUB S 5HALL BE TWICE THE DIAMETER AND -1/2 TIMES THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTEEL. TREE TS SHALL BE TWICE THE DIAMETER AND 1 -112 BTIMES THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTEALL, TREE PITS DEPTH EH- IN—LOS THE ROOTBALL AND A TRANSITIONAL ZONE OF COMPACTED, UNAMENDED NATIVE SQL. D TS ARE OUT WITH POWER —ER, VERTICAL SIDES OF PIT SHALL BE ADDITIONALLY BROKEN WITH BALLING BAR OR SPADE TO INTERRUPT ONTINL'OUS CARVE INFLUENCE N ROOT DEVELOPMEN. E PLANT MATERL 5HALL BE PANTED IN SUGH A WAY THAT AFTER SETTLING, THE CROWN OF THE FLANT BEARS THE SAME RELATION TO FINISH GRADE THAT IT DID TO THE SURFACE IN THE CONTAINER, F. BAGKFILL TREE AND SHRUB PLANING PITS WITH A PREPARED MIX AS FOLLOWS, 1 L 5 PARTS NATIVE ON SITE 501E Ii. 5 PARTS 5014 AMENDMENT. 1. )II. 5 ALBS. OOMMERCIL FERTILIZER EB CUBIC YARD OF MIX OR APPROVED EQUAL. IV. 5 L55 6YPSJM PER CUBIC YARD OF MIX, 6. FORM SHALLOW BASIN AROUND THE EDGE OF PLANTIN6 PITS H. PLANT TABLETS - T GRAM PLANTING TABLETS. PROVIDE TABLETS IN THE FOLLOA,NS RATIOS. I. I TABLET PER GROUND COVER AND LINERS. 11 2 TABLETS PER .LEON PLANT. III. b TABLETS PER 5 6ALLON PANT. N. 12 TABLETS PER 15 GALLON PLANT, V. 14 TABLETS PER 24 INCH BOX PLANT. VI. I6 TABLETS PER SO INCH BOX TREE. VII. IS TABLETS PER S6 INCH BOX TREE V 20 TABLETS FE'R 40 NCH BOX TREE. '. 1. GRADE AREA AROUND PLANTS 10 FINISH SRADES AND D SP05E OF ExCC55 50.. J. LOCAT ON FOR STREET TREES ADJACENT TO ANY L 6HT STANDARDS OR UT LTY EGU PMENT SHLL BE ADJUSTED TO MAINTAIN A 51 TABLE pR Toil R E A�RDEDBYHEEEERORLANDxAPEARHEQT a FE K RA N5 PER DETA LS FOR ALL TREES W TH SLOW OR POOR ORA N N6 5OIL5 PER APPROVAL OF EN6 NEER. L. B 'OK LAYER OF ORGAN O BARK MULCH N LL NON TURF PLANT N5 AREAS LESS STEEP THAN 5. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO CITY 4 LANDSCAPE ARCH TEOT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO BULK DEL VERY TO 5TE.. x COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF —11 1-20' lF- APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED APPROVED HINOSOME PUN —ING FOR .y y THE URII FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION °ATE. DATE. LANDSCAPE SPECS RKPRGJECT NO. 1 L -13 PLANTING 5PEG IF I CATIONS A. AFTER TURF IS NSTALLED, IRRIbATE THOROUGHLY. TO PROVIDE 6DOD MOISTURE PENETRATION. MAINTAIN NT TO ALK5 WITH A MECHANICAL IN A NEAT CONDITION UNTIL THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. B. ED-B W EDGER e TRIM EDGES AT LAST CE MONTHLY OR AS NEEDED WITH A POWER EDGER FOR A NEAT APPEARANCE VADJJM OR BLOW CLIPPINGS TER N6 WA R NRF AREAS AT SUCH F Y AS WE T O CONDITIONS REQU RE TO REPLENISH 501L MO STORE BELOW ''.. C RR GAi ON SHALL BE SCHCOULED BETWEEN O ANp b AM, LLOWING TURF ESTAEL SHMENT . 5. GENERAL MAINTENANCE. ROOT ZONE. C AKE E B TOAENEURE THE TURF A6 NST DANA iNb FROM PEDESTR AN Y TYPE O"BARRIER 15 SUFFICIENT USED T SHALL MEET E PPROVAL OF THE EN6 NEER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, REPA RE i0 ALL DAMAGED TUN LL BE NECESSARY BE THE NCE ri1LL' BE MADE D RR bATEAREA DED OR SEEDED PRINSTALLATION. SD L SHALL BE MOIST i0 A DEP OF FIND INCHES. E. LAY 50D W TH N TWENTY FOUR (24) HWRS AFTER T 5 D. PROTECT ROLLS FROM DRY N6 OUT A5 NCCE55ARY. F ED LL D CARENLLY AND PLACE IN STA66ERED ROWS. TAMP EACH ROLL AGAINST THE ADJACENT STRIPS TO ELM NATE JO NTS AND A`- R- MOVE TRASH WSEKLY. B. EDGE GROUND DOVER TO KEEP N BOUNDS AND TIM TOP GROWTH AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE AN OVERALL EVEN APPEARANCE C. EXTERN NATE VERTEBRATE PESTS GOPHER E TC: AND REPA R DAMAGE AS REQUIRED, D. TEST IRR&ATION SYSTEM WEEKLY AND fl REPORTS TO LANDSCAPE ARCH TECT OR OWNER. ''., C -. THE SITE TEMPORARY FENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO ENSURE SECURITY TO THE SITE 6. TRIM 50 NFORM TO TURF- SHAPES — 11NATEO ON THE PLANTING PLANS. H ROLL ALLF57D RAKERS WITH.AN APPROVED SOD LL TER THAN TWENTY FOUR (2a) HOURS AFTER'NSTALLAT ON. SOD SHALL BB FLUSH iIONAL PLANTIN6 5PEOP CATIONS. GUARANTEE L ALL TREES (E GALLON AND LARGER) SHALL E - ARANTEED FOR A PER OO OF ONE YEAR. ALL HRI�S AND PLANT MATER ALS SHALL X0 CALE DAR E PER ODS COMMENCE FROM THE TIME OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE ENb NEER BE GUARANTEED FOR AT THE COMPLETION SH GRADE OF E %STING WALK. CURBS, E C. p. ROLL N6 MAY BE REOU RED TO MEET LB REOU RRMENT AND ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. O THE 90 CALENDAR D MDA NTENANLE PER OD I. MOW TURF WNER IT REACHES 5 INCHES IN HEIGHT, TO NOT LE-55 THAN 2 INCHES. DURIN6 THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD DO NOT ALLOW THE TURF TO P-l- 3 -I/4 INCHES IN EI6HT. COLLECT AND. REMOVE ALL GRASS CLIPPINGS FROM THE SITE A5 APPROVED BY THE EN6INEER. 2 DURIN6CTHE AS 5 INSPECTIONS ONS AIVD MAIN2NANGE�PEARS�FECTED BY THE ENGINEER, ALL pCAO PLANTS AND ALL PLANTS NOT IN V160R.OU5 CONDITION A5 NOTED L. TURF AREAS WILL NOT BE MADE UNTIL TURF HA5 RECEIVED THE SECOND MOWING AND ALL BARE SPOTS HAVE BEEN RE- 50ODEDE OF OR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE' OF THE TURF AREAS UNTIL ACCEPTANCE. MAINTENANCE PERIOD MAY BE EXTENDED BY THE EN6INEER AS REQUIRED. 6 3. PLANTS USED FOR REPLACEMENTS SHALL BE THE SAME KIND AND 51ZE AS ORIGINALLY PLANTED. REPLACEMENT PLANTS SHALL BE ENGINEER AND SHALL BE FURNISHED, PLANTED, FERTILIZED AS SPECIFIED AND GUARANTEED THE SAME AS THE OR16INAL PLANT MATERIALS. M'OROSEEDIN6 SPECIFICATIONS I P A wMATERIALS. APPROVED BY THE A�NPRUNE NIINMUM NECESSARY TO REMOVE INJURED TWIGS, BRANCHES, DEAD WOOD, SPROUTS AND SUCKERS, B. PRUNE PLANS ACCORD NG TO STANDARD HORi CULTIRAL PRACTICES BY DUAL F CD c. NO TOFF NG OF ANY TREES W LL BE PERMITTED. TREES THAT HAVE BEEN TOPPED W LL BC REPLACED AT THE GONTiAGTOR'S EXPENSE. T. CLEAN W. A O'JRSB OF THE WORK, IDAILY REMOVE SURPLUS MATERIALS FROM THE SITS AND LEAVE PRL ISES IN A NEAT AND CLEAN cOND,TON. B FROR TO CCE AC RI THE P HELEP CTT PER AIR AND CL, CA UP AND REMOVE ALL REMAINING DEBRI5 AND 51URPLUS MATERIALS UPON CO—ION O I EQVIFMENCENTALN HAVE A BUILT NAG TAT ON 5 STEM AND OPERATING CAPAC TY SUFFICIENT ENT TO AG TATS SUSPEND AND HAM LE R EACH 00 6ALLONSTOr INATTEHRN 20 KILOS (44 LBS.) O R6AN C MULCH N6 AMENDMENT PLUS PERT L ZER CHEM GAL - F MULCH: APPLY AT MINIMUM RATE OF 1,600 L85JACRE, RTILIZOERS: e - OR BEST IS -IS -IS OR APPROVED EQUAL APPLIED AT RATE APPROPRIATE FOR PRODUCT. H PPLIED AT RATE OF 70 LBS./ACRE. V. oYDROSEE SEED MIX SHALL BE APPLIED AT THE LBS./I000 50. FT. DESIGNATED ON THE PLANTING PLANS. A ITIVEWSLY SOLIDS ADD T VCS AND SOLIDS I . REMOVE ALL TAGS, LABELS, NURSERY STAKES AND TIES FROM ALL PLANT MATERIAL ONLY AFTER THE APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PLANTING SPE'CIPCATIONS :MAINTENANCE LY MA NTAIN ALL AREAS INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT WRING THE PRO6RE55 OF THE WORK THE MA NTENANCB PER OA AND UNTIL THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. 2. EXECUTION A. INSTALLATION PROCEDURES: '., I. INSISITION OF CONDITIONS: EXAMINE R[LATED WORK INOLUDIN6 IRRIGATION AND GRADING OF SURFACE BEFORE PROCEEDING AND NCHFFT HE LANDSCAPE ARCH SGT N WR T N6 ON COND T ONS WH CH MAY PREVENT THE PROPER EXECUTION OF TH 5 REF OND T ONS W LL RECU RE TE CONTRACTOR TO RECT FY UNACCEPTABLE WORK AT NO ADDITIONAL COST WITH ANY WORK WORK. FA'LURE TO TO THE CITY, 2. ALL THE FORK ND GATED ON THE DRAW NGS OR HEREIN SPEC HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND NSPEC'TED AND APPROVCO BY THE CITY ENS N A SCAPE ARCHITECT ON A 3O CALENDAR OAT SCHEDULE MAINTAIN A AREAS WITHIN THE PROTECT BOUNDARY FOR A PERIOD OF PO TERR ALL PLANT AREAS THOF20UbHLY TO SATLRATL- TIPPER LAYERS OF 501E PRIOR TO THE HYDROSEEDIN6 OPERATION. III ALLOW THE Po NT Nb AREA MIL 6URFACC TO DRY OUT FOR ONE DAY ONLY PRIOR TO THE HYDROSEED N6 APPLICATION, EXERCISE I., SURFACE TO BE' OVERLY S RATED W TH WATER PROR TO THE NYDROSEED N6 STALLAT ON. T C SAME CARE NOT TO B BE CALENDAR DAYS 3. TREE' AND SHRUB CARE: ' A WATERINS, MAINTAIN A LARGE ENOUGH WATER DA5IN AROUND PLANTS 5C THAT ENOUGH WATER DAN BE APPLIED TO ESTABLISH MOIS'NRE THROUGH THE MALOR ROOT ZONE. WHEN HAND WATERING,.. A WAND TO BREAK THE WATER FORGE. NOT BECOME TOO DRY DUR N6 TH 5 PER OD. THERE SHOULD BE SOME RE5 WAL MD STURC W TH N THE FRET 14 NCH. R TO STARTING iE HYDR05EEDIN6 OPERATION NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE FOR1Y-EIGHT (46) HOURS IN ADVANCE TO BE OF OI TOSEEDING, B. HYDR05EEDMG APPLICATIONS: THE 50 LOSUR�FACE 'c. PRESENT AT START C B TREE PRUNi,vb: O SELECT EVEI-OP PERMANENT SCAPPOLD ERM,NCMES M LEER IN ES AMCTCR TO THE TRUNK OR BRANCH O riH CH THEY ARE ACHED WH C C RT�� FROM O AS I A ND —11 OR ENTATISON TO NOT HART_ 6ROWrH WY ONE NOTFER, T EL N4 NAR V- PED BRANCH FORKS AT L OWN , SPACE BALANCE GROWN WITH ROOTS "RAI51N6 I. APPLY THE HYDROSEEDING IN THE FORM OF A 5LWRY CONSSTINS OF ORGANIC SOIL AME'N04ENT=v., 61MMERCIAL FERTILIZER, AND ANY OTHER RE CALLED OUT. CN HYDRAU'L CALLY SPRAYED ONT E 5O L.THE MULCH SHALL FORMA R R-L KE MATERIAL, OPERATION 9 THAT THi5 PROCEDURE WILL C ILL AND THE ELLRRY COMPONENS THE SLURRY SFRAY W LL N R'TRA 571 � FACE 5 CNSUR NG MAX MUM MPRE6NATION AND COOVERAGE, THE IMPRE6NAi ON AND MAINS OF THE COMPONENTS FILL N'N6 MO ST1RC WHILE STAB L Z NG 501L —ACE FROM SUPBRF C AL EROSION. 11. DO NOT LET THE MTCRDSEEDING SLURRY COMPONENTS INTO THE HYDREER EDM6 MACHINE FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) HOURS BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE SEED CTION. IF SLURRY COMPONENTS ARE LEFT FOR MORE THAN TWA HOJRS IN THE MACHINE, App SO% MORE THE ALSO HELP II, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES HILL STRIPPING OF LOWER BRANCHES OR UP" OF YOUI TREES BE PERMITTED. RETAIN LOSR BRANCHES IN A.' D SARCK " OR PINCHED CONDITION WITH AS MUCH FO -1— AS P0551BE TO PROMOTE TRUNK TH (TAPERED TRUNK). L WE BRANCHES MAY BE REMOVED ONLY AFTER E 5 ABLE TO STAND ERECT W'.. HCUT STAKIN6 OR OTHER SUPPORTO OF ORIGINALLY ANY SLURRY MIXTURE WHICH HAS NOT BEEN APPLIED WITHIN THE TWO HOURS AFTER MIXING AED 1 MORE OF THE ORIGINALLY H HAS NOT BEEN APPLIED EIGHT (6) HOURS AFTER MIXING. ALL MIXTURES MORE THAN EIGHT (6) HOURS '.., , NF 1TE, AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. EPC-CIFIBp SEEV SCID M TO ANY OLD, MUTE - MIX III TH N OUT AND SHAPE EVERGREEN TREES WHEN NECESSARY TO PREVENT NAD AND STORM. DAMAGE PERFORM PR MARY ''.i I. SPRAY THE AREA W TH A UN FORM VISIBLE GOAT, US N6 THE DARK COLOR OF THE CELUJLO5E FIBER AS A V 5UAL GU DE THE DOWNWARD SLRRY SHALL BE PftRUN N6 TO DEC DUOUS TREE5 DURING THE DORMANT SEON, PRUNE DAMAGED T� OR THOM THAT CONST TUTE HEALTH HAZARDS AT ANY TIME YEAR AS DIRECTED BY THE UNEIREER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. DR LL INS MOTION VIA A FAN STEAM NODZZL�E NSJRE THAT ALL OR THE SLURRY COMPONENTS ENTER v�JRE TITHE UN FORM TY OF THE HY1 -11D APPLICAT ON. L C CONTRACTOR SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANE AND MIX WITH THE SOIL. -- ARCH TECi. O SAFETY OF THE I . SHRUB PRUh'INb: CT!VE5 OF SHRUB PRUNING ARE. THE SAME AS FOR TREES. v0 NOT CLIP SNWBS INTO BALED OR BOXED FORMS I HE UNLESS SUCH 15 REQUIRED BY THE DESIGN AND DE516NATED ON THE PLANTING PLANS, I I MAKE ALL PRUNING CUTS OF LATERAL BRANCHES OR END5, AS EIRECTED BY THE ENGINEEEROR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CARE IV. E RCISE LlSCWILDIN65,TETC R MOVEANY ALLL SLVRRY SPRASLURRY FORM O TO THESE SURFA ONTO CE5 AT THE CONTRACTOR EXPENSE. DING V. COHTRACT�W ALL SAVE ALL SEED AND FERTILIZER TAGS AND FIBER MULCH BAGS FOR THE LANDSCAPE- ARCHITECT TO N65 ANp SPECIFICATIONS. vi WACCEEPTAIS EAFP R HT'D ESE SHALL L PRESENT DURING THE HYpR05EEDINb OR ATION ANp HAS FINAL DETERMINATION IF ROCT APPLICATION CONCRETE WALKS, VERIFY COMPLIANCE CONDITIONS ARE. III. TOPPING 15 NOT ALLOWED. D TAKING: REMOVE STAKES AS SOON AS THEY ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. INSPECT STAKES TO PREVENT &IRDLIN& OF TRUNKS OR BRANCHES, AND STAKES NDVCUT THEE 9TAKE9 50 MEY ARE NOTPRODTRUOI E CONTTRANC IN6�� W AT THE TIME OF MAINTENANCE SHALL REMOVE THE E WEED CONTROL. I KEEP BASINS AND AREAS BETWEEN PLANTS FREE OF WEEDS. APPLY PRE- EMMSENTAHERSICIDESDRENG � ENDED BY A LICENSED PEST CONTROL ADVISOR TO ALL NON-SEBDED LANDSCAPE- AREAS ONLY. L CULTIVATION THAT SHALLOW ROOTS OR DISTURBS PRE - EMERGENT HERBICIDE APPLICATION. 3. MAINTENANCE A. WON ACCEPTANCE OF HYDROSEEDIN6 OPERATIONS MAINTAIN ALL HYIROSEEDIN5 AREAS FOR A PH: IOC OF AD CALENDAR DAYS I. GERMINATION STAGE IRRIGATION: APPROXIMATELY 25 HOURS AFTER HYDROSEEDING THE PLANTING AREAS, INITIATE THE THE SLURRY AND SEED. PERFORM FREOUENT, LIGHT RRIGATION UNTIL THE SEED HAS 6BRMINATED, AEMNSE EROSION Y II ESTABLISHMENT STAGE IR ATION: AFTER GERMINATION, REDUC -C EACH WATERING. THE SPECIFIC WATERING PROGRAM SHALL � E LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. AS FOLLOWS: R5 5EOUENCE. REPAIR ALL SEED BE APPROVED BY DESTROYS 11 ERADICATE XIOUS WE[D5 FROM SITE (i E. NUTbRA55, BERMUDA GRASS, KIKLYU GRASS, CRAB GRASS ETC). . IS FERTILIZATION. FERTILIZE ALL HYDROSEED AREAS WITH AN APPROVED COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER, 30 CALENDAR DAY5 FROM THE 1 NANCE PRIOD AND CONTINUING ONCE EVERY 60 CALENDAR DAYS UNTIL THE COMPLTION OF THE 90 CALENDAR DAY MAINTENANCE START OF THE PERIO, F. INEECT AND DISEASE CONTROL MAINTAIN CONTROL WITH APPROVED MATERIALS C AE ALL CONCENTRATED DEVELOPMENTS OF WEED GROWTH APPEARING IN THE SEED PLANT B AREAS.OURIN6 THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD SHALL FZRT G MAKE THREE APPL CNT ONS OF COMMERCIAL PERT L ZER AT iE RATE OF 5-6 LBS. PER p00 SLtUARE FEET AT THE FOLLOWING BE REMOVE CONCENTRAT ON5 OF WEEDS MANUALLY OR BY A CITY APPROVED HERBICIDE PROGRAM. PER ✓oSA(MANTENANDE PROGRESS 5PECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR VERIFICATION OF FERi L ZER APPL CAT ONE) D. M N MUM C RAbE AND ACOBPTANCE I. 3O CALENDAR DAY5 AFTER THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD HAS BEGUN I. MINIMUM COVERAGE: F PTANCE MAY BE 61VEN AT THE END OF THE 90- CALENDAR ALENDAR 1AY5 AFTER 11 MAINTEIANCE PER OD HAS 1-1, DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD IF AN ACCEPTABLE GERMINATION OF TURF AND ADEGNATE PLANT _ENT HA5 BEEN OBTA NCO AS pMCRM NEO BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCH TECT. N 5 E CALENDAR A A E PER N A ULO BE PE MANIA'.ACTURE 5 E SITE C INFER —APE APPROVAL. H. RE LA,EMEN, OF PLANTS, REMOVE MAE ' AND DYINS PLANTS AND REPLACE WITH PLANTS 01 G UAL 5 ZC AND VARIETY OF OR b NAL FLANT NG PLAN AT NO A=ITIONAL COST TO THE tt ANI AS APPIDMI HE 'R. AL PPROVAL ACCEPTANCE KILL BE 6TM N WRI N5 EY THE ARCH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OLLO Nb ACCEPTANCE SPECTON, E LAHEEC TECT RESERVES THE O PTO O EXTEND THE MATERNALSCW TPCR UN 100 EVE LETS 6ERMINAT ON OF AL NRF R HER ,COLOR AND DENSITY THROU6H0JT ALL HYDR05EEDED AREAS. HlNOBGI y. N O + I I. G RE. LY A PRE HERB ATHE A E A 51X (b) MONTHS GROUND COVER ANp 1 END OF SE_GT ON =y' 1N FL AHRUB AREAS. H RB C SHALL BE TRO STEREO FOR USE ON THE SPEC ES OF PLANT MATERIAL SPECIFIED LANT Nb PLANS AND AS ISTURB OF PLA OVED BY A N E PCSi CONTROL ADVISOR. H , 4, TURP CARE, (DE ENDS 0 VARIETY IF .TURF]' � �. A SHALL BE DETERMNNED� EMT ELESSINEL-R.SMOW AT EAST ONCE EVC-ORY SEVEN (7) ) DAYSMWRN6 SPRN5 AND FALL SEASONS AND AN NEEDED DURIN60THER SEASONS, — eo -an e .. Revsw+s reaoveo ogre RFt'ERBNCES DATe BENCHMARK SCALE OM UNIT ""' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT oeeinv[oev Imnnxx ar --- c. oN A APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITAS.COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO.. _ _ -- 1 -20 _ _ PLANS PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF DATE, RECOMMENDED APPROVED BY _ BY _ LANDSCAPE PIAN DRAWNO FOR: THE G;Q"rmR FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION �q -- ...._.._ A cN DATE: DOE: LANDSCAPE SPEG'S woRN PRa6cT ND. SHEET 14 OF 15 —TREE NE TREE PLA�NV�IEWj A— WINS C I I / IL TO STAND NO'rt ALL PLANT BASINS ALL Or jG R�TA NOTE,, T NHHS LATER �OAF 6MAJL5 LL APPP _ OP- A NET E N TTR7A LS p T APPROLVACNAD A — AI, v NRF FREE TREE TIE STALLAi ON AREA 1 3' FROM iR11NK • - - Q b CONG2ETE CURB CONORETE BACKF LL MIX 51 OEAALK (SEE SPECS.) 6' BA 6. COVER S" BASIN N LAAN BAMKF LL M X (SCE 5PEC5) IS. -i E 5 AKES O ET B MIrvMUM MINIM MINI NUM REOU D To E bLE W LD - N MIN, MAINTAIN n FREE N NNLAWNO / + SROOTBAL ��,(� ^`' - ROOT TABLETS %p (AS 3' DRAIN GAP 6�' E b" A RR.ER TYP. SE S E SJ tt - ( - PLANT BACKF MINIMUM - ROOTBALL �l Sx �I( b \� a _ = N6 TO EST AND SETTLE TO PLANT AT LL X � - RE P • SERE NT- IN a PLAM N6 DETAIL FOR B. � ILIZ R�ABLE 9(TPERK SPECS) ANT NG AT ON \'—BACKFILL Bx ROOTeALL I. FINISH GRADE ddd pD PLANT NS TABLET5 4. WATERING BASIN NOTE F ry SH bftADE 5. ES ALL NOT P E �O�RB�E 1, TOP OP ROOT CONTROL BARBER MUST BE AT GRADE. (SEE SPECS) L 5E ROOTBALL FROM 3' MAX TO /3 ^ MIN 5H L EMEND v D 5N LL TO UEN AL 3. POASIT ON ROOT CONTROL BARBER ADJACENT TO 5rRUC'NRE. ttP. SED ROOT DEFLECTORS 'AC N6 PLANTED AREA ry 3 PERFORATEp - -- PPE n SLIP - PLAN BAC FLL PUODL D SETTLE TO EST PLANT AT 6HER THAN ADJACENT F 5H GRADE 50 L. A(.KF LL (PER IS-). I — 50 L (TYPJ S RR ER SHALL E%TEND A M N: OF B" OA BOTTOM OE NARD5cAPE. 5. PROVIE A MIN, OF 10 FEET OF ROOT BARBER PER TREE ROOT BARBER SHALL A MIN. 6 AP w/66RA AL PER B%. ROOTBALL PLAN P N _ GRADE AS TIC NK 611ARD SUCH AS A%WR -6ARD S MANUFACTURED _ DEEP ROOT CORP. BE OF � •Ow GSA ON WALK SIDE. T. ROOT BARRIER .SHALL BE A M N OF 34 W GRADE ON CURB SIDE. S- SHALL BE B O BARBER M NUFAONRCD BY R5ETASRPREC ALTIE5, INC. SAN OE60, CALIFORNIA A TREE STAKING - 24" BOX B TREE PLAN'T'ING C ROOT BARRIER D SHRUB PLANTING NOTE: ALL PLANT BASINS SHALL .... RECEIVE A 4" LAYER OF _._ PACE OF WALL OR BUILDING NMre. LocATE PLANTS SPACED EMU D STANT (D) PROM EACH OrHex AS SHORN. D = As � APPROVED MULCH. - SPREAD ON WALL E SECURE W/ANCHORS • • • • • • sHOwn oN PLANriN6 PLAN_ 6:, ' - O I ��1 _— U (PER SPECS) • \ \._ g -REMOVE NURSERY STAKE • • • • • • / /// - \ ' -% 2 4 - /ii SET ROOTBALL TIGHT TO FOOTING, REMOVE • j - - - ->• • /SD a 1 9 ��" aX LL A :.� • • I ANY EXCESS TRA5H GONG. AT PLANTING BOLL EDSE OF , AALK, HALL, ETC. II \I .. 11 MAINTAIN TURF FREE AREA 12'. FROM TRUNK PLANT TA ( E SPECBI TH cK r LLED PLANT xb BED 5 �P "I � 1_ ax- vAME ER 8� • 6' BASIN IN G. COVER ro P A 4 TH oK MULCH LATER PRIOR Nr N66RDUNDOOVER y 7 4 r 1 ••. 1 3" 5A51N IN LAWN FINISH- -wls.. GRADE r � \I 8 �'�a. ROOTeu� =' E MN LPERP uRSN PLAN • Ij GRADE J"ANT . TREE AKE AND TREE v -A POLE STAKES N6 SPECS / NmES N N 6RCUNOCOVER AREAS xr _ANT Ns SPECS / NorSs sH. RAOS Ill, EA—HATE.1 e s N truKE vaoorH PRIOR • �j III •.. Q — X - -'� III i� a ^ABDVEPxsH 6RAOE X PER PLANT N6 specs r EvEL z II — OBIP MULCH PER Fuvr r� PLAN ore PLUSH wTr FNSH 6RAOE o res PER PLANT xs SPECS / NOTES VB _ eAS N <. cuTP NT w FIT NT ro CREATE EvEL BASIN . - I I HANDED SOIL MENDED5E6RADE , 3X ROOTBALL ROUNDcOVER SHALL BE PLANTED IS OC. H SHRUB PLANTING ON SLOPE S H Lj E VINE PLANTING P GROUND COVER PLANT "ING C' TREE PL,AN`I'ING ON ShOPE FEE` ��1 Planting - "° a °' e °a° REV Swxs — aFPRBVEn Bare REFEaeNCES Al. BENCHMARKS SCALE --- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �o.�a.a. esTON� M yA `'"`A= _APPROVALS CITY OF ENCINITA$ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DRAWING NO. .._._._.._.__..— _ . ..............._ rE w _.__- ..._.._ PLANS PREPARED ....— UNDER THE SUPERSION OP B ,M RECOMMENDED APPROVED Br:__ -_ _.._ B:._ DATE: _ -_ BATE: _ LANBSCwEPLW BwR THE CsRAUER FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION LANDSCAPE DETAILS _NR PROU., NO. L -15 SHEET 150E 15 - -^ - - -- - - -_ -- _._- __..._._ _..._...__