The URL can be used to link to this page

1999-6075 GE- NEERING SERVICES DEPARTA. P PLANCHECK CONSULTANT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: SUBDIVISON ENGINEERING DIVISION; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SECTION T JOHN POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. O 175 CALLE MAGDALENA, SUITE 101 ENCINITA''S,,^^CA 92024 /) ATTENTION: J, f< i j t� a- DATE: 7 ? Regarding (Finance Number 4496-2- tQf-) DEPOSIT E �M/MUP/MIN/DR: (Finance Number 406X - FM )DEPOSI E " Oa(c/eN (Finance Number b,-" -31 PO /FEE APN: ?Wdl- D91' SY' ML Transmitted as following: 66n 61 Comments/Additional Space for Document r Final Parcel Map ® Final Map C] i� ,i SMta1/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed �a Corrected ❑ Approved (3 Interoffice Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined �K Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM /IPM ❑ Resolution of Approval o Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street ame CJtar ea ❑ Preliminary Title Report 0 Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ t11l'ca`7 5) Other v Wit a ref an® Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title reportfVesting Deed, 6) Copies to: i e Traverse Calculations, Reference Maps Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ® - M'"t k e wtvr Gss i 6sii w i - �TeccSG stut� rte.Gioi-S bade. DeferredMonumentationLetter❑ Agency Letter: ❑ 6.0'w. wls 6✓t J s!' Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ • CS I DWD /�LCWD f f ATV) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ S etch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan M / 1-� L,-- mt lan Change /As -Built Proposed Corrected ❑ Approved LJ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blue line /Red -lined ® Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (P Nate Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. oa ater /S__wer/rraiVPark/Facility) 6062 (nK --';, /yf- r Grading Plan ' Ian Change/As -built Proposed& Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc' ® 407.5 (n K Blueline/Red -lined E' Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ �o(JGrS Hydraulic Calculations/Map0 CostEstimategXL Soil Report,® 3 Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Roug relimm recise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. r1- VP among & Irrigation) Pursuant to the terms of our contract with your firm, we request professional plan check services for the aforementioned plans and/or supporting documentation. If you have any comments, guestions or need additional information, please give us a call at (760) 633 -2776. / 6 !n Originator: -Al H !i °s S I Position: 1�1 1 r. Tee-z' 505 South Vulcan Avenud, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG/ARR/Pln_Cons.doc/02.11.99 I of I City 0 0NGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT EYICinftas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering October 15, 2003 Attn: California Federal Bank 24221 Calle De La Louise Laguna Hills, California 92653 RE: Oakley, Takabayashi, Cornucopia, Inc. APN 264- 091 -58 TPM 98 -139 Sewer Permit DCS315 Final release of security Permit DCS315 authorized sewer improvements as shown on approved plan, all as necessary to build described project. Final, acceptance, and warranty inspections have all been completed to the satisfaction of the Field Operations Division. Therefore, release of the security deposit is merited. The following Certificate of Deposit Account has been cancelled by the Financial Services Manager and is hereby released for payment to the depositor. Account # 725 - 0141731 in the amount of $16,353.00. The document originals are enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633 -2779 or in writing, attention the Engineering Department. Sinc ly, Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering CC: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Cornucopia, Inc. Debra Geishart File ay L mbach Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 760633 -2600 / FAX 760 -633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas. California 920243633 TDD 760.633 -2700 1� recycled paper /A letter of transmittal DATE: October 31, 2002 JOB #: 4460 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors to 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX: 760 943 -8236 TO: Duane Thompson / or Debbie - Engineering Counter City Of Encinitas Engineering Counter 505 S. Vulcan Avenue RE: TPM 98 -139 remainder parcel grading plan 6809 -G SUBJECT: As- builts COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 6809 -G redline as- builts 2 Original Mylars As -built Please call if you have any questions or if you need anything additional, Thank You! �eode By: Steve Crosby P.E., Projoct Engi ENGINEERING SER'110ES CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (#[) Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Held Operations Subdvision Engineering Traffic Engineering Traffic Engineering (T•E) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: <�-h el /-c-, V DATE: ( d �}2 Regarding (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE TP P/MIN/DR: (Finance Number -_) DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number - DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Subminal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved C] Interoffice Memo" ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit E] Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application O Approved TMlrPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee O Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: — Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Not Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plal ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway O Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ • ( CD /CS/FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/I' /CAT -V) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline /Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calcula O Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) ,pbris Note: See other blocks for dditiona tems, if any. ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/Trail/Park/Facility) Grading Plan Submittal/Plan Cha a /As -built Proposed ❑ netted ❑ Approved ❑ cc Blueline/Red -lined Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Hydraulic Calcul ons ap ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Requirements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval For Your... Review Us ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATO�� (Name) T— (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARRAntra_Trms. daa/02.11.99 1 of I letter of transmittal DATE: October 24, 2002 F OB# 4460 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors to 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone 760 753 -5525 FAX: 760 943 -8236 TO: Duane Thompson I Engineering Counter City Of Encinitas Engineering Counter 505 S. Vulcan Avenue RE: TPM 98 -139 remainder parcel grading plan 6809 -G SUBJECT: As- builts COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 6809 -G redline as- builts 2 pad certification letter 1 memo from inspector Todd Baumbach Please call if you have any questions or if you need anything additional, EC � Thank YrnD n D By: Ste e C sby P.E., Project Engineer IENGINEERING SERVICES �I[R CA Oct -21 -02 12:10pm From- 4b; ifa. cM OF ENCIVITAS 505 S. Vulcan Avenge Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 DATE /o -Z/ - oZ SEND TO FAX # COMPANY:':: FROM: ❑ Call ASAP ❑ please Handlc 1 ftm Fax 9,4ctl 9X3RCl! ❑ Review & Call ❑ Per Our Conversation m w ■ T -409 P 0011004 F -232 TRANSMITTAL FORM FAX: 633 -2818 Community Development Engineering Fro Administrstion Flre Prevention PUhllc WOH93 9q3- 8236 �-# PP ATTACHED 3 76o 2- 79b PHONE: *}9[633 :w & Return ❑ F.Y.S. e Repiy bye ❑ As Requcurd MURRIF -12 Ivan le. FOX, P.E. Pam L. Mummm, P.E. Gordon L. McElroy, P.L.S. Laurie Simon. Principal Planner CIVIL ENGINEERING Fsgircenng Studies Sim Develnlmenl Anslyus Gr Ing Phns Impmvemem Plam Dnimgc Plans Se.e, w r Lnte PI... erammgynlyaaw,a Conswcnm Admi .,.nn n Pa.'(nl[nl Relubdlmlm Forensic Enginrenng LAND PLANNING Pnd.quaieon A.1,y , land Use Con Wwon Fnvmm,rcnul Analysis Govemmem Rd.tium land Division Tcntni. MMs MNm U. Rmuts Specific Plans Retuning V. o., Adminumative Pemuts A.eOA om Roundary Adjmtm nls LAND SURVEYING Pm ny Surreys Topogr.olt .l Survm Consuucticn SuLmg Records or Survey Isg.l Description, Subavmmn Maps F'asenanu engN cen,r,.nton, CwL "l S,uveys PhdngnmtrctrK surveys SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS October 21, 2002 SDE 4460 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Subject: Engineer's Pad Certification Reference: Project No. 98 -139 remainder parcel, and Grading Permit No. 6809 -G Pursuant to section 23.24.310 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for remainder parcel of Project No. 98 -139. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state rough grading for these units has been completed in conformance with the attached plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. 23.24.310 (B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Pad Elevation Pad Elevation Parcel no. Per plan Per field measurement Rem. Parcel 222.0 222.8 23.24.310 (B) 1. Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices and /or retaining wall have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.310 (B) 5. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.310 (B) 6. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. Sincerely, Steven R. Crosby P.E. Senior Associate Engineer engineering\4433 \1elters \pad certification 4460rem.wpd (760) 7535525 a FAX (760) 943.9236 4407 Manchester Avenue a Suite 105 a Encinitas. California 92024 L INEERING SERVICES DEPAR: NT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Suppon services Field Operatiora Subdivislon Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Q\ Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (k 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T p ATTENTION: 7 DATE: 2Z Regarding (Finance Number )3EPO�P1/FEE TP P /3 g �Rl0;2 (Finance Number D OSIT " (Finance Number DEPOS APN: %� — Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map Cl Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Comments/Additional Space for Document: Interoffice Memorandum' ❑ Planeheck Comments' ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Mail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: n Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ •( Staff/ Consultant/CD /Fire/SDWD /OMWD /LCWD) Sketc (if needed): Fl /rImprovement �.�� /�,•OY Q'� (Public/Private) ( Road /Dminagd W ater/Sewerf rmil/Park/Faci l ity) intermediate Description: _ P12 �— S Check eckprint/Approved Copy / riginaVRejected Plancheck Comments' ❑ —' — GradingPla Check Checb,'i pproved Copy /OriginaMejected Plancheck Comments* ❑ Plan Change Description: _ (Mass/Rough/Prefiminary/Precise) (Erosion ControVPlanting & Irrigation) Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate O Soil Report ❑ Hydrology StudylMap ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correct] n ❑ Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses O please velum Please call: if necessary Original Copies to: V Mess ad Facsimile E] Other C] I Received by: –�`{A Date: A Title: Location: 0 Y 'telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SUARa/Gencric Trans dod02.1199 1 of I V v v letter of transmittal DATE: March 6, 2002 JOB# 4460 _. SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX 760 943 -8236 TO: Debbie I Engineering Counter City Of Encinitas Engineering Counter 505 S. Vulcan Avenue RE: TPM 98 -139 SUBJECT: As- builts COPIES DATE NO, DESCRIPTION Sewer Plan CS -315 Grading Plan 6075 -G Private Road Grading Plan 6062 -G 1 1 1 CS -315 Original Mylars 1 6075 -G Original Mylars 1 6062 -G Original Mylars Please call if you have any questions or if you need anything additional, Thank You! By: Steve Crosby P.E., Project Engineer V VGINEERING SERVICES DEPT iMIENT TRANSMITTAL FORM Cop lal Improvement Projec Distnct 5apport Service Feld Operolior Subdivision Engineerin rrorfic Engineenn FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) At Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (__D) ❑ Office of the Director (p I) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T p ATTENTION: 7 DATE: Regarding (Finance Number EPO /FEE TP M/MUP /3 / (Finance Number D -SIT i (Finance Number DEPCISI APN: %� Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Repoli ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Interoffice Memorandum' ❑ Plancheck Comments' ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ Easement R: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Agreement re: Improvements ❑ Improvement Pla Checkprint/Appro Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Assessments ❑ nE _Check Plancheck Comments* ❑ (Type) (Check) CommenWAdditional Space for Document: • ( Staff / Consultant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) SkeLtjScs (if needed)n v7 ",� �Gf/�� /G�ACQ•I.O � r � (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage / W a t e dS e w e r/f ra i VPar k/F ac i I i ty ) Intermediate Description. Grading Plato //xi /_`7— L7_Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments* ❑ Plan Change Description: Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Hydrology Study/Map [] Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ (Erosion Con"I/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry E] Our Approval ❑ For your... Correctjpn ❑ omment ❑ Signature ❑ Information E] Uses E] Please return �y��/ m Please call: , if necessan Originator Copies to: V Mess cell Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ I Received by: �A Date: 0 A Title: Location: 'telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 ISG AFUUGencric Trans doe/02 11 99 1 Oft ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM r-it-t Capital Improvement Projects District Support services Feld Operations Subdvision Engineering Traffic Engineering 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600 /FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633.2700 1SWARR/Intra Trans.doc /02.11.99 1 of: T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) kill" Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (NI) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: 7,'1191Z4 DATE: O i Regarding (Finance Number CAS ��) DEPOSIT/FEE TPM/TM/MUP/MIN/DR: _ _SQL -1y _ (Finance Number 60 7'5 - __q__) DEPOSITIFEE AiCL�"/ rS[.t4%Jl ✓ /SJOnJ (Finance Number /a k21 DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TMfTPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: /Cig Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentalion Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • ( CD/ CS/ FIRF/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/T/CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ improvemen 'Pplan Submittal/Plan Change s -Bu Correcte Approved Mfg. Specs. Proposed ❑ Blueline /Red -lined Checkprint Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for addi tonal items, if any. (Road/Drainage/Wa ter /Sewer /TraiYPark/Facility) Grading Pla ��SubmittalfPlan Change/ s -built Proposed Correcte Approved cc' ❑ Blueline /Red- lined Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion ControlIPlanting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Re Irements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review [V Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: S� (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600 /FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633.2700 1SWARR/Intra Trans.doc /02.11.99 1 of: U letter of transmittal DATE: December 31, 2001 JOB #: 4460 wt SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX: 760 943 -8236 TO: Tamara Oneil City Of Encinitas Engineering Counter 505 S. Vulcan Avenue RE: TPM 98 -139 SUBJECT: As -built submittal COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 Sewer Plan CS -315 2 Grading Plan 6075 -G 2 Private Road Grading Plan 6062 -G Please call if you have any questions Thank You! or if you need anything additional, By: Steve Crosby P.E., Project Engineer ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (4l) ,Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: i�r� / L7 _ DATE: !h/ ZI� Regarding (Finance Number &� - — 6�71 DEPOSI FEF TP M/M�U-�P-�/MIN �� - 3 (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE 11 wmo ��aY�s -?- (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: I Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map p _ Submittal/Amended/Corrected Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ Approved TMITPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ ('orporate/Partnership Papers E] Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ =ed Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ vat Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change /As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline /Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other 6) Copies to: Additional Notes: X (CD /CS/FIRF/SD W D /OM W D/LC W D /G& UT /CATV ) Sketch (if needed) / Description: L� (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/W ater /Sewer/TraiVPark/Faci I i ty) Grading Plan V � Submitta tan Cha /As-built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion ControVPlanting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Requirements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review ❑ Use PC Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ GINATOR� (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600 /FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/lnlra Trans doc /02.11.99 1 of I ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE L% APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT NUMBER RECEIPT NUMBER OO G.S a-C k CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS Ir-vIfne CA `iz;�W DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant AC 101-0000.345-0100 Construction CN 101. 0000 - 345-0200 Exempt Organizations EX 101-0000- 345 -0400 Grading Plancheck GR 101 - 0000 - 345-0700 Grading Inspection , C.O GI 101 -0000.345 -0800 Final Map Processing FM 101.0000-345 -0500 Parcel Map Processing PM 101-0000 - 3450600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101. 0000 - 345 -1100 Improvement Plancheck IR 101-0000345 -0900 Improvement inspection 11 101 -0000 - 3451000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101-0000 -345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101- 0000 -345 -1500 Street Name Change SN 101-0000-3451300 A.P.N. Report PN 101-0000- 3452100 Security Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK O TOTAL JAI Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSIT ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME PERMIT COORDINATOR I TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER I 17:161 412is111TJ -1:W CHECK NUMBER ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE - ED PROJECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED NTO PROJECT NUMBER FIELD TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE - SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN) PROJECT * AMOUNT TOTAL June 13, 2001 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Encinitas, CA 92024 Subject: Drawing No. 6809 -G, Remainder Parcel, PM 18461 Affected Property: Parcel 1, PM 18642 To Whom It May Concern: SDE 4460 Permission is hereby granted to construct improvements as shown on the attached plan referenced above. (Signature and Date) Phillip G. Decarion Trustee Decarion Living Trust NOTARIZATION ATTACHED notary required r Q 7-Q M 61,0 / CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California ss. County of torAkiuG.? On ��uE 14j 2Mle , before me, Lal)!4�A '&-W 6- CrACE Oale Name and Title of Officer (e.g. 'Jam Doe. Notary Pudic') personally appeared DGc42rok/ Name(sl of Signers) .- i.�IAURA RENE EUSTACE COMM. # 1173149 9 Y1 Notary Public Californa ORANGE COUNTY . .. • my C.e,wim Exp. 2/9/01 f �y Place Notary Seal Above ❑ personally known to me �oved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(,$) whose name(s) Qare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me thatQWshe/ihey executed the same in 7�teLAheir authorized capacity(ies.., and that by AXheP/then signature(syen the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the persons} acted, executed the instrument. WITN nd aA official seal. r Sgnalure of Nolary Pubic OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to ,9nother document. Description of Attached .D ment ' Title or Type of Document: !/piyli)N7o Y► a`Z 6'" 144L4 Document Date: JZ1t11C / / f 0 / Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer— Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fad ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGHT THUMBPRINT Or SIGNER ®1997 Natmnai Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave.. P O. Box 2402 • Cnatsa cr t, CA 913132402 Pmd. Ne. 5907 Reorder Call Toll -Free 1.800$766627 — INEERING SERVICES DEPARTA,,;NT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (kl) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: ��ifY7 /C DATE: DO _ Regarding (Finance Number DEPOS EE TPWrM/MUP/MIN/DR: /39 (Finance Number DEPOSI " (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: 7 - Z-4 Transmitted as following: Comments /Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: /- Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter* ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • (CD /CS/ FIRE /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/f /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ �n� `" Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ /r/ �/jj /// / C� /�/L� �f7. e Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan ChangeJAs -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. E] Blue line/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ / vy Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additio I i ms, if any. ( Road/ Drainage /Water /Sewer/Trail/Park/Facility) Grading Plan &— u mi Ian Change /As -built Proposed ❑ C ted ❑ Appr ve ❑ cc • ❑ Bluelme/Red- lined Check rint Or Hydraulic Calculations Ma Cost Estimate Sod Rep Letter re: Permission to Gr Structural ations (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for ad itional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Requirements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inq ' /Proposal F-1 Our Approval E-1 For Your... Review Er Use [D Approval Signature Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /AR -Mntra Trans.doc /02.11.99 1 of I E. NEERINC SERVICES DEPARTA. T PLANCHECK CONSULTANT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: SUBDIVISON ENGINEERING DIVISION; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SECTION T JOHN POWELL & ASSOCIATES, [NC. O 175 CALLE MAGDALENA, SUITE 101 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 ATTENTION:lalbft- l DATE: (a d I Regarding (Finance Number C(61 r,_Af=)-DEPOSI� TPM1TM/MUP/MIN yt CIS h2 (Finance Number S)DEPOSI� "��$I►JNI / Iti4�ct� (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red- lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original p Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/IPM ❑ Re4olution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Preliminary Title Report `�7R Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: J= ' Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/r /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park O' Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage El F1 Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ Improvement Plan Submitt Ian Chan As -Built Proposed ❑ Co ted ❑ Approved g. pets. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calcul Ions ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ �y-�_ (KW]iK Private Note: See other blocks for addition I items, if any. a t Water /Sewer/Traii/Park/Facility) Grading Plaa) 2 mi /Plan Change /As -built Proposed ❑ Coi ed ❑ Approved ❑ cc' ❑ nal ❑ Hydraulic Calculati ap Cos Estimat Soil Report Blueline/Red -lin Checkprint OPalculationsEl Letter re: Permission to Grad Structural ry ( Qc Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ontroVP Ing &Irrigation) Pursuant to the terms of our contract with your firm, we request professional plan check services for the aforementioned plans and/or supporting documentation. If you have any wmments, questions, or need additional information, plcase give us a call at (760) 633 -2776. Originator: �r Position: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 3SG/ARR/Pln Cons.dod02.11.99 I of ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPA.. -, dENT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM CoFtal Improvement Prole DisMct Support Serer Feld Operatk Subdvislon rngineeri TraMc Er91neeri FROM: Cipital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) Traffic Eagneenng (TE) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development- Current Planning O Firt-Fire Prevention ATTENTION: iL W I i F�1 San Dieguito Water District-Engineering I !� unity Services - Parks & Beaches DATE: W ( f S e O Regarding (Finance Number 6 9 - 6I`—/� IDEPOSIT/FG:) TPM/fM/MUP/MIN/DRo (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE " 2 g'1 — PGC... (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff/C onsultant /CD/Firr/SDWD /OMWD(LCWD) Sketch (if needed): 5`F:4Q (Publir/Nivate) (Road/Drainage/W ater /Sewer/Tra i VPark/Fac i lity) Intermediate Description: Improvetaeat Plan ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Grading Plan Beck t / Approved Copy / Original / New evised Plan Change Description: (M eliminary/Precise) lion trol/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Co ection ❑ Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses El Please return l tJ 21nJ [C-S Please call: 2733 if necessary Originator: Copies to: r:�zra� 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633-28 IS / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARRflntcr Trans doc103.02v9 I of I E INEERINC SERVICES DEPART . AT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvemenl Projecls District Support Services Field Operolions Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineedng T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE)) Traffic Engineering (TE ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (k 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ A=NTIOIV DATE: ZI Z8' b Regarding (Finance Number 41e:J DEPO SI EE ) TPMC[M/h41 IN/D : (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE IQ7�r'r ' NE %tllT5f4 -0V 15_11 (Finance Number _) DEPOSIT/FEE APN: - acl I " Jr2 19? Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Hap (J Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected t) Response to Plancheck ❑ _ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Bluehrre/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TMTPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report(Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: L Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter• ❑ Additional Notes: t_r-11!52-"rC C)K— Deferred Mooumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ • ( CD/ CS/ FIREISDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &FrF/CATV) Sewer ❑ Park Cl Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ o �L 111 r Improvement Plan ❑ SubmittaVPlan ChangdAs -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Road/Drainage/Wa ter /SewerrfraiVPark/Facility) Grading Plan Submitt Ian Change/As -built Proposed ❑ C ected App�ro�ve ❑ cc Blueline/Red -line Ch ckprinto Origi ❑ Hydraulic Calcul ons/Map C t Es ate Soil Report Letter re: Permission to Gra e ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (M pContromanting minary/Precise) ((Eros & Irrigation) As Per... SubmittalBtequirement Our Conversation E] Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review U e Approval ❑ Signature E3 Information ❑ ORIGINATOR: C ur � L'i I (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARFAnua Trans. doc/02 1 199 I of I. INEERING SERVICES DEPARTA. _: JT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development-Current Plannin g O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: San Die uito Water District-Engineering & Plann' Community Services - Parks & Beaches DATE: 1 a p Regarding (Finance Number (!B -� DEPOSIT/FEE (CPM/ UP �✓ (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE g/ / !- " (Finance Number DEPOSITIFEE APN: Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Improvement Plan 0 Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Grading Plan ! ✓� Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / -New or Revised i As Per... For your Please return Originator: _ Other Application: Check (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: (Staff/ Consultant /CD/Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) ( Road / Drainage /Water /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facil ity) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: & Irrigation) Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry [] Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry `0 Our Approval ❑ Co ection ❑ , CCoon/ent �❑ Signature Q,Information ❑ Uses El Please call: i v 3 , if necessary eau!), S Q4 Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 AG/ARR/Inter— Trms.dod03.02.99 I of 1 EA EERING SERVICES DEPARTM INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM i Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services C—D) ❑ Office of the Director W) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development- Current Planning O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: San Dieguito Water District - Engineering, & Planning /y 2� iw Community Services - Parks & Beaches DATE: - DEPOSITIFEE T( P�v/}u+ Regarding (Finance Number UP (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff / Consultant /CD/Fre/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/W ater /Sewer/Trai VPark/Facility) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan ❑ Check - Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised — - — -- - - ---- - - - - -- -- -- — �-T Grading Plan Check"J- Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original J ew or vised I Plan Change Description: (M /Precise) tion) ( rosion onoP nig & Irriga J5 As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑/ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry Our Approval ❑ For our... CoVeecctio �Cooent ll Signature Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return "- �" "y Please call: if necessary Originator: Copies to , 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 I of 1 1SUARR/Inter Trans doG03.02.99 ENGINEERING SER VICES DEPARTMENT INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Copital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Er4neenng T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services ( _D) ❑ Office of the Director (#1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: !o a DATE: 12-75-0c;, Regarding (Finance Number 6_�� DEPOSIT/ :;Fi � 1 16.3 (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT /l/�$f ' (Finance Number _� DEPC IT/FEE A Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Inter we Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ OTigin!!JZ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM ❑ Rejit6luticin of Approval D Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report tn Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ n Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ 41 rYl Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: !,(CJ S DWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &FJ'I' /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑❑ Agreement etc (i eded) / Description: l ` �/� (� re: Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan ❑ Submittal/Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected 0 Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other bloc for additional items, if any. ( Road/ DrainagelWater /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) / Grading Plan � S bmitta an Changel s -built Proposed Cotrec Ap e ❑ cc' �' By eline/Red- linedhe print ❑ Orig 1 ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Ma Cost Estimate Soil Report Erl P Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ ( u Iiminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if an rosion ontro lanting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Re ements Our Conversation ❑ Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature 0 Information ❑ ' 0z; air J ORIGINATOR: , —73 (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 IWARR/Intra Trans.doc/02.11 99 1 of I INEERING SERVICES DEPART, iT INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM Cap, al Improvement Projecls Disldct 5upporl Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineenng FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ff Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (#1) 0 Field Operations (FO) ❑ S`> Community Development- Current Planning O Fire -Fire Prevention San Dieguito Water District - Engineering & Planning Community Services — Parks & Beaches ATTENTION: DATE: /2,- 2� rOy Regarding (Finance Number - DEPOSITIFEE UP �✓ (Finance Number _� DEPOSITIFEE (Finance Number _� DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Improvement Plan O Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / New or Revised Grading Plan I Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original 4w or vised Other Application: (Type) for Document: 0 (Public/Private) (Road/Drainage/W ater /Sewer/TraiVPark/Facility) Intermediate Description: Plan Change Description: & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry '0 Our Approval ❑ For your... Co ectio 7 ❑ �jCoo�/ent Signature Information C] Uses ❑ Please return � 4 1 �`"' s Please call: d �3 if necessary Originator: Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SUARRAnter Trans.doc/03.02.99 1 of 1 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City of Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment /Stormwoter Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering August 8, 2001 Jessie R. Oakley 2171 Pavillion Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 Re: "Remainder Parcel of PM 18461" Grading Application 6809GR [Rough Grading/ Erosion Control] (grading for a single family residence } A.P.N. 264-091-68 Permit Issuance requirements This correspondence shall serve to briefly summarize the Engineering Permit process. Drawing 6809 -G is pending approval by the Director of Engineering Services, which will be valid for three years. In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per this Drawing, you will need to satisfy the following requirements: (1) Obtain all plan approvals. Then, provide 4 blueline copies of the approved Drawing, and 2 copies of the soil report by Southern California Soil and Testing Inc.dated May 20 1999 and update letter titled "PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING REMAINDER PARCEL MAP NO. 98 -139 WILDFLOWER ESTATES OLIVENHAIN, CALIFORNIA APN #264- 091 -68" DATED FEBRUARY 23, 2001. (2) Post a Security Deposit in the amount of $20.004.00 to guarantee performance of earthwork, and erosion control. Up to 80% of the amount may be in the form of a Performance Bond issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Twenty percent of the amount has to be in the form of cash, certificates of deposit, a letter of credit, or an assignment of account, any of which may be used for the full amount. Any financial instrument's format is subject to approval. Complete the Security Obligation Agreement. (3) Pay non - refundable Inspection and Permit Fees, respectively, as follows: (a)GRADING PERMIT... of $ 1,000.00 and (4] Pay a Flood Control Fee at time of building permit or precise grading plan. The rate is 50.21 /SF, and is assessed on the net increase in impervious surface area due to the driveway and other hardscape. An additional assessment will be levied on the room addition during the building permit process. (5) Provide the name, address, telephone number, and state license number and type of the construction contractor. fgradin g/gm ew /gr6809i. doc I ow 111. 16"33-2600, FAX 760- 633 -262? 50 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas. California 92024-3633 TDD'60$33-2700 III recycled paper Construction within the public right -of -way is restricted to qualified contractors. Depending on the work to be done, the contractor will need to possess as follows either a valid: la) Type "A" General Engineering, any work, or (b) Type "C -12" Grading & Paving, any surface improvement, state license, and meet the minimum insurance requirements as stated on the accompanying handout. (6) Sign the Permits. Any authorized representative of the property owner may sign. Permits are valid for no more than one year and may expire earlier due to expirations on letters of credit and /or insurance policies. Once the Engineering Permits are issued, advance notice of 48 hours must be given prior to you or your contractor scheduling the mandatory pre- construction conference. See Grading Note #9. Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division, who can be contacted at (760) 633 -2704. Construction changes, prepared by the Engineer of Work, should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Prior to issuance of any Building Permit, a rough grading approval will be needed from the assigned Engineering Inspector. At a minimum, rough grading is defined as certified pad preparation and soil compaction, and safe access. As- builts of Drawing 6809 -G, prepared by the Engineer of Work and approved by the Engineering Services Department, may be required prior to Final Inspection. A Final Grading Report may be acceptable in -lieu of as- builts at the discretion of the assigned Engineering Inspector. Please note that Building final inspections are separate from any Engineering final inspections and are not necessarily coincidental. Satisfactory completion of final inspection is a prerequisite for release of the remainder of the Security Deposit. This letter is limited in scope. During the Building Permit process, you will need services and be subject to regulation from as follows: the Planning Division, Building Inspection Division, Fire District, San Dieguito Water District, and all of the City, and the Encinitas Union School District, Olivenhain County Water District, San Dieguito Union High School District. Please inquire at their respective counters. Additional engineering requirements will be forthcoming during the Building Permit process, including, but not necessarily limited to, coordination of the building site plan with the grading plan, resolution of any outstanding public improvement issues, and assessment and collection of sanitary sewer, if applicable, and additional flood control fees. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2783, or you may wish to visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center- (grad ing/gm ew /gr6809 i. doc2 w ' Sincerely, Duane Thompson Associate Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering cc San Dleguito Engineering, Engineer of Work Todd Baumbach, Engineering Inspector Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Technicians permitfflle enc General Construction Permit Security obligation Agreement Right -of -way Construction Permit Standard Conditions Requirements for Proof of Insurance DS -7 Modified fgrading/gmew /gr6809 i. doc3 Apr -27 -00 15:21 TOMS ENTERPRISES 9497241338 p_OZ �Ieww CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT SECURITY OBLIGATION AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SEWER IMPROVEMENTS KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /we Cornuco aa,L)c. d.�a. TpAA -% , Principal, are held and firmly bound unto Cardiff Sanitation District, in the City of Encinitas, in the County of San Diego,, tate of California, in the sum of F% u + MAC rl,o�s.nd Ff4;t N',tiL -t 0 /,oa (S 'f 9i,tV 49_) in the form ofCe-,t1$ , e*3:i 1; 1;-5-o'417444 on deposit for the District Finance officer (per re eipt # ) and to be held by it until this obligation becomes void and if any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by Cardiff Sanitation District to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provisions recited hereinafter. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known as Tf% 99- 131 , in accordance with Sewer Construction Permit No. kSg/C , dated 1 -3 -1og o and is required by the District Regulations to give a security to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall be conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Sewer Construction Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the regulations and standards of the Cardiff Sanitation District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this _ $�L day of i I9 aooa . a - Notar' e CO uc �V7A -� Business Address m121G2 CAL FED CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK.. Account Holder CORNUCOPIA, INC. FOR THE BENEFIT OF CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT /CITY OF ENCINITAS, SEWER PERMIT #DCS315 EVIDENCE OFACCOUNT 30 DAY CLASSIC CD Account Number Date of Issuance 725- 0141749 04/28/2000 CORP- PROFIT Opening Initial Balance $ 49,059.00 Maturity Date 05/28/2000 Initial Rate Renewal Of Interest 3.456 %Per Annum Term 30 DAYS Annual Frequency Percentage of Earnings Yield (APY) 3.456 % I Distribution ANNIVERSARY MONTHLY This account is held with California Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, Member FDIC. Please refer to the account disclosure for complete terms and conditions. This account is subject to the Bank's rules and applicable laws and regulations for the deposit classification. A copy of the Bank's account disclosure has been furnished to the accountholder. This account is not transferable except on the books of the Bank. rtx« * * *k *rty *Ry, fadaralluM i �rm,ms Ail California Federal Bank A Federal Savings Bank (Authorized 50882 \`Pi Apr- -27 -00 15:21 TOODS ENTERPRISES 9497241338 P.02 Rc'. W.1L, 10wul fir�rJ -# X64- 091 -58 CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT SECURITY OBLIGATION AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SNOw ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /we Coraacoe,ca ,hjc, "CL - 1 -y'Us , Principal, are held and firmly bound unto Cardiff Sanitation District, in the City of Encinitas, in the County of San Diego,, State of California, in the sum of 5, 7 .c.n I Ro.,Sa,..j Tk,-C-G F 4g r4te- * 0 /Ml ($ S 00) In the form of CCC.-t- ,4;L�tc!lt.a.,-�.tY2S614Opp deposit for the District Finance Officer (per receipt q ) and to be held by it until this obligation becomes void and if any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by Cardiff Sanitation District to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provisions recited hereinafter. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known asT1m 99 -139 , in accordance with Sewer Construction Permit Noj(-S315 , dated 9- 3 -�L000 , and is required by the District Regulations to give a security to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; Now, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall be conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Sewer Construction Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the regulations and standards of the Cardiff Sanitation District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this _ �1-g4,- day of A} 1, 1-9aco0 _. ipal - Not ize jJ1- i �°i5o c_,71`,t� i�d. Ini.2�,Ca.9a6ry Business Address m12162 CAL FED CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK , Account Holder CORNUCOPIA, INC. FOR THE BENEFIT OF CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT /CITY OF ENCINITAS, SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #DCS315 EVIDENCE OF ACCOUNT 30 DAY CLASSIC CD Account Number 725 - 0141731 Date of Issuance 04/28/2000 p "I'll D MAY 120 ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS CORP- PROFIT Opening Initial Balance S 16,353.00 Maturity Date 05/28/2000 Initial Rate Renewal Of Interest 3.456 %Per Annum Term 30 DAYS Annual Frequency Percentage of Earnings Yield (AP Y) 3.456 % Distribution ANNIVERSARY MONTHLY This account is held with California Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, Member FDIC. Please refer to the account disclosure for complete terms and conditions. This account is subject to the Bank's rules and applicable laws and regulations for the deposit classification. A copy of the Bank's account disclosure has been furnished to the accountholder. This account is not transferable except on the books of the Bank. m nmom S0a82 California Federal Bank A Federal Savings Bank ey (Authorized at e) Apr -27 -00 15:21 TODDS ENTERPRISES 9497241338 P.03 1d1r)o i W CITY OF ENCINITAS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SECURITY OBLIGATION AGREEMENT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /we C104-ALA 0 ,l ) �a,- r10AAS , Principal, are held and- -- firmly bound u to the city of Encinitas, a municipal corporati *,' in the County of San Diego, State of California, in the sum or One r1.o�s�d_ o,J "1, o0 ($ 1 000- o o ) in the form of G_�t �c�{�ltleoos t 7z5- oi4i7oi on deposit with the City Finance Officer (per Receipt # ) and to be held by it until this obligation becomes void and if any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by the City of Encinitas to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provision: recited hereinafter. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known as - pa 9 g-13q in a gcordance with Engineering Permit No. �o��_ Imociysmg•��_, dated -3 —a pp0 and is required by the CiLy Code to give a security to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall be conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Engineering Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the ordinances and standards of the City of Encinitas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this a M_ day of Apr, I , �3_a000 - BO /03 /PW1 -21wp5 8 (01/18/93 -11) L(/L4 CAL FED CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK , EVIDENCE OFACCOUNT 30 DAY CLASSIC CD Account Number 725- 0141707 Date of Issuance 04/28/2000 Account Holder CORNUCOPIA, INC. FIMAY -� � FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS IMPROVEMENT PERMIT #606211 CORP- PROFIT Opening Initial Balance S 1,000.00 Maturity Date 05/28/2000 Initial Rate Renewal Of Interest 3.456 % Per Annum Term 30 DAYS Annual Frequency Percentage of Earnings Yield (APY) 3.456 % Distribution ANNIVERSARY MONTHLY This account is held with California Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, Member FDIC. Please refer to the account disclosure for complete terms and conditions. This account is subject to the Bank's rules and applicable laws and regulations for the deposit classification. A copy of the Bank's account disclosure has been furnished to the accountholder. This account is not transferable except on the books of the Bank. b „mom 60882 California Federal Bank A Federal Savings Bank By (Authorized Sign u \`Pi Apr -27 -00 15:21 TODOS ENTERPRISES CITY OF ENCINITAS 9497241338 lRe;. P•03 Uj.Id -faww R ?nt *� aby -c91 -5$ GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SECURITY OBLIGATION GREEMSNT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /we orn,j c•oa'a ��c.. principal, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Encinitas, a municipal corporation, in the County of San Diego, State of California in the sum of e� F %iv Tun TkoaSn.,,A Fn�r un 1knRP� v �r ($ /S�No3.oy in tie form of C.�+ �.a�o,oS,t77SDIyIISyon deposit with the City Finance Officer (per Receipt ) and to be held by it until this obligation becomes void and if any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by the City of Encinitas to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provisions recited hereinafter. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known as "»/M *- 9g -134 i accordance with Engineering Permit No. dated _�.3 -luoo , and is required by e CTity Code to give a security to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall he conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Engineering Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the ordinances and standards of the City of Encinitas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this �Klg— day of Pyp� _ , =eeip Uc Business Address B0 /03 /PW1 -21wp5 8 (01/18/93 -11) CAL FED CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK., Account Holder CORNUCOPIA, INC. FOR THE BENEFIT OF CITY OF ENCINITAS GRADING PERMIT #6062GI EVIDENCE OF ACCOUNT 30 DAY CLASSIC CD Account Number 725- 0141764 Date of Issuance 04/28/2000 p %�oe� D MAY 12000 ENGINEERING SFRVIrFS CITY OF ENCINirn S CORP- PROFIT Opening Initial Balance $ 152,403.00 Maturity Date 05/28/2000 Initial Rate Renewal Of Interest 3.456 %Per Annum Term 30 DAYS Annual Frequency Percentage of Earnings Yield (APY) 3.456 % Distribution ANNIVERSARY MONTHLY This account is held with California Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, Member FDIC. Please refer to the account disclosure for complete terms and conditions. This account is subject to the Bank's rules and applicable laws and regulations for the deposit classification. A copy of the Bank's account disclosure has been furnished to the accountholder. This account is not transferable except on the books of the Bank. 1 !Ne al y IwM i{ California Federal Bank A Federal Savings Bank ey Y� (Authortz Signa re) 50882 Apr -27 -00 15:21 TOODS ENTERPRISES 9497241338 CITY OF ENCINITAS P. 03 Re'. (,J; U -Pow W /iJ�N".2(,q- 091 -SS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SECURITY OBLIGATION AGREEb1ENT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /We C.OJ A O held and firmly bound unto the city of Encinitas corporation, in the County of San Diego, State of the sum of. F; ��v o�sco&A k�,aL� ��o�a A QKF a a ($ SO o 1. O ) in the orm of L- V. ii u4c de osit with the city Finance Officer (per Receipt # Principal, are , a municipal California, in P to be held by it until this obligation becomes void the conditions herein are breached, to be applied } 715 of ) and if any by the City Encinitas to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant provisions recited hereinafter. Mel and of of the The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known as 8-139 in accordance with Engineering Permit No. OGza.Sz= 6rg�lan_ dated `i 3-a�o , and is required by the City Code to give a security to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement-, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall be conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Engineering Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the ordinances and standards of the City of Encinitas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this _ agd�� day of = -- ipal 0 r Business Address BO /03 /PW1 -21wp5 8 (01/18/93 -11) CAL FED CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK EVIDENCE OF ACCOUNT 30 DAY CLASSIC CD Account Number 725 - 0141723 Date of Issuance 04/28/2000 Account Holder CORNUCOPIA, INC. D FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS GRADING PERMIT #6062GI CORP- PROFIT MAY - 1 2000 SERVICES CINITAS Opening Initial Balance S 50,801.00 Maturity Date 05/28/2000 Initial Rate Renewal Of Interest 3.456 % Per Annum Term 30 DAYS Annual Frequency Percentage of Earnings Yield (APY) 3.456 % Distribution ANNIVERSARY MONTHLY This account is held with California Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, Member FDIC. Please refer to the account disclosure for complete terms and conditions. This account is subject to the Bank's rules and applicable laws and regulations for the deposit classification. A copy of the Bank's account disclosure has been furnished to the accountholder. This account is not transferable except on the books of the Bank. ww... rw.�iry ik„ne S0882 California Federal Bank A Federal Savings Bank By (Authorized Ignatu ) C Apr -27 -00 15 =21 TOODS ENTERPRISES 9497241338 CITY OF ENCINITAS P_03 f{J�1'r 26L4 - 0 9( -Sb GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SECURITY OBLIGATION AGREEb[ENT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /we Corner op lac. CL� C,, S, , Principal, are held and firmly bound u to the City of Encinitas, a municipal corporation, in the County of San Diego, State of California, in the sum of -LILT Fo�� T�o�S� S x N�ndaJC S xfiv Se e 2S7,00 (S 34 �L� . as ) in the form of on deposit with the City Finance Officer (per Receipt # ) and to be held by it until this obligation hecomes void and if any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by the City of Encinitas to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provisions recited hereinafter. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known as 7:p�/h4 q8 -139 in accordance with Engineering Permit No. 6015 Gz C dated L-}- 3 -a-oo0 and is required by the City Code to give a security to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall be conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Engineering Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the ordinances and standards of the City of Encinitas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this t-k day of AbrA 19 a000 - Pr' rtc' pal C© eOPIA', dX' , Business Address BO /03 /PW1 -21wp5 8 (01/18/93 -11) CAL FED CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK.,. EVIDENCE OF ACCOUNT 30 DAY CLASSIC CD Account Number 725- 0141715 Date of Issuance 04/28/2000 Account Holder CORNUCOPIA, INC. D L % � O U� T FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS 2000 GRADING PERMIT #6075GI MAY 1 CORP- PROFIT Opening Initial Balance 8 34,667.25 Maturity Date 05/28/2000 Initial Rate Renewal Of Interest 3.456 %Per Annum Term 30 DAYS Annual Frequency Percentage of Earnings Yield (APY) 3.456 % Distribution ANNIVERSARY MONTHLY This account is held with California Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, Member FDIC. Please refer to the account disclosure for complete terns and conditions. This account is subject to the Bank's rules and applicable laws and regulations for the deposit classification. A copy of the Bank's account disclosure has been furnished to the accountholder. This account is not transferable except on the books of the Bank. oe8? California Federal Bank A Federal Savings Bank BY n (Authow igna re) \ Apr -27 -00 15:21 TOODS ENTERPRISES 9497241338 CITY OF ENCINITAS P.03 PC-•. W,td-Phww rt -P r,� " z (. y- t) 91 -5$ GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SECURITY OBLIGATION AGREEMENT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That I /we Principal, are held and firmly bound untb the City of Encinitas, a municipal corporation, in the County of San Diego, State of California, in the sum of. One Ho P Focr Tkoo & 1 a.,d O Ito vs ($ to ) in the form of 17,S(. on deposi with the City Finance Officer (per Receipt # ) and to be held by it until this obligation becomes void -and if any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by the City of Encinitas to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provisions recited hereinafter. The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that whereas the above named Principal has agreed to provide certain improvements for the property known as rn 4 9- f 3 9 in accordance with Engineering Permit Na. 6 n"LGI _ ; dated y -3 � 0 0a , and is required by —the City Code to give a security to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Tn addition, this security shall he conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and conditions of the required Engineering Permit including any condition specifying a time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the ordinances and standards of the City of Encinitas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Principal has hereunto set his hand, this ol�+t- day of Ate` 19 aoov . °- -` � iPa l CO Business Address BO /03 /PW1 -21wp5 8 (01/18/93 -11) CAL FED CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK Account Holder CORNUCOPIA, INC. FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS GRADING PERMIT #6075GI CORP- PROFIT EVIDENCE OF ACCOUNT 30 DAY CLASSIC CD Account Number Date of Issuance 725- 0141756 04/28/2000 o �� 19 D MAY - 1 2000 ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS Opening Initial Balance $ 104,001.75 Maturity Date 05/2812000 Initial Rate Renewal Of Interest 3.456 % Per Annum Term 30 DAYS Annual Frequency Percentage of Earnings Yield (APY) 3.456 % Distribution ANNIVERSARY MONTHLY This account is held with California Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, Member FDIC. Please refer to the account disclosure for complete terms and conditions. This account is subject to the Bank's rules and applicable laws and regulations for the deposit classification. A copy of the Bank's account disclosure has been furnished to the accountholder. This account is not transferable except on the books of the Bank. IMy�• FM 1. SI 1n�uM to uM1nro sonez California Federal Bank A Federal Savings Bank By��Y (A�l Yl (Authorized not e) M CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT APPLICANT PROJEC i ACTION FORM D ,A 1 a y APPLICANT DEPOSIT NAME arr ssoal . e 5 DATE ADDRESS .2 &4 50 wl. VZ APN Lh GT zb /�/ PERMIT# DOS315 DEPOSITS TO ACCOUNT #501 -0000- 213 -00 -0 0 (A) (B) (C) (D) Overhead Total City Project Applicant Project Charges Expenses Descript/Code Number Deposit Expenses (Col B x %) Col B +C Sewer Construction Permit (Et) tX5 1 2 000 Security (SY) TOTAL 2-)000 Debit 501 -0000- 213 -00 -00 CHECK REQUEST (BILLING) AMOUNT $ AUTHORIZATION: Project Coordinator �- FINANCE: Processed By (E) Refund or Amount Due (Col A-Col D) AMOUNT Engineering Services Department Date 7 $ l REVENUE FUND ACCOUNT CODE DESCRIPTION 502 ODOQ349 -60 AN EQUITY (-EXPANSION -) FEES Cancelled ( 1830 /EDU/ZonkV for annexaton appliction) 503 000434130 CP CAPACITY FEES - Wastewater Discharge Permit (f34171EDU, 1250 /conneclan Cardiff Trunk Bond Fee, and 1100/connection Encinitas Boulevard Upgrade) 505 0004349 -80 RM RECLAMATION FEES - Wastewater Discharge Permit Cancelled (11,0001EDU if annexed after 921182) 501 0000349-50 PS PROCESSING FEES - (S700/18W fee for annexation appi"tion, 5% for reimbursements, 1150 for Connection Agreements) 501 0000 -210-00 SR REIMBURSEMENT FEES - Wastewater Discharge Permit (8658) DuYrvler; direct or indirect Other 0 Name: 501 0004349 -20 SC SERVICE H RGE - Wastewaber i §oharge /EDU ; month through June) Permk I$ ar prorated TOTAL AUTHORIZATION: Project Coordinator �- FINANCE: Processed By (E) Refund or Amount Due (Col A-Col D) AMOUNT Engineering Services Department Date 7 $ l CARDIFF SANITA'1ttvN DISTRICT APPLICANT PROJE. i ACTION FORM APPLICANT DEPOSIT N W W r `'� P- �T DATE ADDRESS 2Z APN CIE �J $ PERMIT S S DEPOSITS TO ACCOUNT #501 -0000- 213 -00 -00 (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) Overhead Total City Refund or Project Applicant Project Charges Expenses Amount Due Descript/Code Number Deposit Expenses (Col B x %) Col B +C (Col A -Col DI Sewer PermituE14S1, 31FJ Permit (E1 - Security (SY) REVENUE TOTAL ' IF�3� Debit 501 -0000- 211 -00 -00 CHECK REQUEST (BILLING) AMOUNT $ AUTHORIZATION: Project Coordinator FINANCE: Processed By 4� Department Date_ 1 Engineering Services REVENUE FUND ACCOUNT CODE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 502 0000- 349-60 AN EQUITY ('EXPANSION -) FEES cancelled ($8= EDU /Zoning fa annexation applictwn) 503 0000- 349-30 CP CAPACITY FEES - Wastewater Discharge permit ($3417 1EDU, $250 /connectb Cardiff Trunk Bond Fee, and $100/connection Encinitas Boulevard Upgrade) 505 0000 -349-80 RM RECLAMATION FEES - Wastewater Discharge Permit cancelled (51,000 /EDU if annexed after 90182) 501 0004349 -50 PS PROCESSING FEES - ($700/$800 fee for annexation appi"Wri, 5% for reimbursements, $150 for Connection Agreements) 501 0004210 -00 SR REIMBURSEMENT FEES - Wastewater Discharge Permit (86 -58) DuVrvier; direct or indirect Other N Name 501 000434320 SC SERVICE H RGE -Wastewater i arge Nxwt i oJWd _A -Wd TOTAL AUTHORIZATION: Project Coordinator FINANCE: Processed By 4� Department Date_ 1 Engineering Services 7 7ID iml PASCO ENGINEERING, INC. 535 NORTH HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 (858) 259 -8212 FAX (858) 259 -4812 1101310111:41 1111 . I ..... 111 1 •11. To: City of Encinitas Dept. of Engineering WE ARE SENDING TO YOU: M Attached ❑ Under separate cover THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: JUN 0F1(JOr Date: 6/6/2001 Job No. PE 742TS Attn: Tamara O'Neal Re: Rossini Park Estates I' Plan Check Revisions (GP & IP) Copies Date No. Description 1 ❑ # Previous City Checkprints (GP & IP) I # Copy of Steep slope Open space Easement (Doc. 2000 - 0033293 Rec. 1 -21 -2000) 1 # Copy of Title Report for Adjacent same owner parcel (260-28 1 -0 1) 1 # Geotechnical Investigation 2 2 Revised Bonding Cost Estimate for Grading Plan 2 # Supplemental Hydrology /Hydraulic Report 2 1 Blue lines of revised Improvement Plan 2 2 Blue lines of revised Grading Plan 1 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested 0 For review and comment REMARKS: Check for $100 for Erosion Control Deposit letter of transmittal DATE: December 18, 2000 JOB# 4460 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 41 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX: 760 943 -8236 TO: Gary Lee City Of Encinitas Engineering Counter 305 S. Vulcan Avenue RE: TM 98 -139 Remainder Parcel SUBJECT: Submitted for 1" plan check \ \\ W- �� COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPa�`ty 5 Bluelines 2 Soils Report, Hydrology report, Cost Estimate 2 Approved TM and conditions 2 Prelim. Title Report 1 Application 1 51400 submittal fee Submitted for first plan check. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely; By: Steve Crosby P.E., letter of transmittal DATE: February 27, 2001 T OB# 4460 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors FEB 2 82001 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 l Encinitas, CA 92024 seFVICES Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX 760 943 -8236 TO: Gary LeelDuane City Of Encinitas Engineering Counter 305 S. Vulcan Avenue RE: TPM 98 -139 remainder parcel grading plan SUBJECT: 2o° plan check COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 soils report update 1 revised drainage study 1 revised cost estimate 1 original plan check items 1 certificate of compliance 2 revised plans Please call if you have any questions, Sincerely, By: Steve Crosby P.E., Project Engineer ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS /9�/ Z .</o v PERMIT NUMBER e�, Vo9Gy RECEIPT NUMBER 3 r Lq 10 CHECK NUMBER 0 33 CASHIER INITALS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER AgreemenVCovenant AC 101-0000 - 345-0100 Construction CN 101-0000.345-0200 Exempt Organizations ED( 101-00003450400 Grading Plancheck ©� • r�v GR 101. 0000 - 345-0700 Grading Inspection GI 101- 0000 - 345 -0800 Final Map Processing FM 101-0DO(1,U50500 Parcel Map Processing PM 101. 0000 - 345 -0600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101-0000-345-1100 Improvement Plancheck IR 101-00063450900 Improvement inspection II 101. 0000.345 -1000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101'0000 - 0.45'1200 Street Vacation VA 1 01-0000-345-1500 Street Name Change SN 101-0000 - 3451300 A.P.N. Report PN 101-0000 -345 -2100 Security Demon CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON HACK TOTAL / /'✓DO• p Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 r,T ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPONACTION FORM DATE I\79■G7_T:1Vil l=1 APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER IWALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE = ED ECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED PROJECT NUMBER FIELD TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE - SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN PROJECT III AMOUNT TOTAL ENOINEERIfDEPARTMENT APPLICANT k 5 ACTION FORM DATE APPUCANT NAME APPUCANT ADDRESS / PERMIT NUMBER (o � - 6 RECEIPT NUMBER i CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant AC 101-0000. 345-0100 Construction CN 101-0000- 345-0200 Exempt Organizations EX 101- 0000. 345 -0400 Grading Plancheck 100, (7o GR 101400(1345-0700 Grading Inspection GI 1014000. 3454800 Final Map Processing FM 1014000345-0500 Parcel Map Processing PM 1014)000.345.0600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101400003451100 Improvement Plancheck A 101-0000 - 3450900 Improvement inspection II 101-0000 -345 -1000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101-0000-345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101 - 0000 - 345 -1500 Street Name Change SN 101.0000 -345 -1300 A.P.N. Report PN 101 - 0000345 -2100 Securtty Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL /00. 0,0 Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 ENGINEERING _:PARTMENT APPLICANT DEPAW ACTION FORM DATE APPUCANTNAME a-ar£5 L� APPLICANT ADDRESS 2�7 17 ✓AF GC us�1 J PERMIT COORDINATOR TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER UJ O CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE - ED PROJECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED INTO PROJECT NUMBER FIELD PROJECT i I I AMOUNT lZGS'S /NN/ ?#IX E5%XTXIs 01//W." 6991 8�os�oH Cevrnx �-A T TOTAL VE DATE �e— �a —0, -- CITY OF ENCINITAS TRANS. DATE JOURNAL TRANSACTION ENTRY FORM DCUMENT# ROUP DESCRIPTION BATCH NO. FINANCE PERIOD RANS. DATE ACCOUNT NUMBER MEMO PROJ. # DEBIT CREDIT TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION REFERENCE u Originator Approval: G: \FORMS\Je2.Xls Finance Approval: Entered By: Total Debits Total Credits Batch Count Lo CITY OF ENCINITAS m CUSTOMER RECEIPT M BATCH ID: CASHIER 6/06/01 11 RECEIPT : 0067575 DESCRIPTION OTY AMOUNT PAYMENT DESC PT SV 1 $100.00 r ENGINEERING DEPO ED CK ROSSININ PARK ESTATES DEPOSITS / ENGINEERING 10100002130000 PLAN CHECK $69976 TOTAL CHECK $100.00 Tender Details CK $100.00 DATE: 6/06/01 TIME: 13:13:37 I I E' rNEERING SERVICES DEPARTY -T Capitol Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering city O Traffic Engineering Encinitas Building Permit Number: - o Pies) NONE Assessor's Parcel Number: `" �� O�I _ _ co ( DEVELOPMENT FEE SUMMARY The City of Encinitas has adopted regulations that require the payment of fees that will contribute to the funding of new infrastructure needed as a result of private development projects. Impact fees assessed and collected through the City Engineer's office that have a citywide benefit are as follows and further described per the given references. Fees Flood Control Traffic Mitigation Account No. 232 - 0000 - 343.30 -00 233 -0000- 343.30 -00 Ordinance No. 97 -19 91 -24 Municipal Code 23.96 23.94 Other impact fees may be applicable, and include, but are not limited to, fire mitigation fees (Fire Prevention Bureau), park and recreation fees (Current Planning Division), school fees (Cardiff School District, Encinitas Union School District, or San Dieguito Union High School District), sewer fees (Cardiff Sanitation District, Encinitas Sanitary District, or Leucadia County Water District), water fees (Olivenhain Water District or San Dieguito Water District), and the like. Please inquire at the appropriate counter. ORDINANCE Flood Control Traffic Mitigation FOR OFFICE USE ONLY FEE TOTAL: S�� Project ddress C)400�IIaR � Applica ame Community Area 1 -1 Telephone Private Rd: � A P--I o Aer Dr— (street name) Cg CAP 7. - G (dw g) Oie-t39 -Tm (case) See worksheet on backside for multiple permits. JSG /ARR/Dcvel_Foe Sum_Sh1Ldod12.23.99 DATE PAID: S l I 1 O U RECEIPT #: 00SSa —�{ it Received By: Iof2 TEL 760 - 633 -2600 / FAX 760 - 633 -1627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 72024 -3633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 1� recycled paper PUBLIC FACILITIES FEES WORKSHEET Tract: " Fee Total: S JSG/ARR/Dcvel Ftt Sum Sh12.doc1 12.23.99 2 of 2 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE 7 y II APPLICANT NAME PArr 4030G r r.te s �. �: rµ �• 4J-r e-vtGr-t ,I �RrT NG✓'j Kl �! APPLICANT ADDRESS ay5 d U,1 e- kd. PERMIT NUMBER 6 0 �:7 5 61 k RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS yV��Ci DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant AC 101-0000- 345 -0100 Construction CN 101-0000. 345-0200 Exempt Organizations EX 101-0000 - 345 -0400 Grading Plancheck ��500. O O GR 101 - 0000345-0700 Grading Inspection GI 101 -0000- 345 -0800 Final Map Processing FM 101-0000 - 345 -0500 Parcel Map Processing PM 101-0000.3450600 Permanent Encroachment PE 101 - 0000 -345 -1100 Improvement Plancheck IR 101-0000- 345 -0900 Improvement inspection II 101 - 0000 - 3451000 Temporary Encroachment TE 101-0000 -345 -1200 Street Vacation VA 101 - 0000 - 3451500 Street Name Change SN 10140004U5 -1300 A.P.N. Report PN 101-0000 - 345-2100 Security Deposit CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL 1 500, O 0 Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /0ct151998 ENGINEERING , _PARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSI i r%CTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS ;14 li tololol 'I ell OvAitli TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INTTALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT CASHIER CODE = ED PROJECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED NTO PROJECT NUMBER FIELD TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE = SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN PROJECT i F AMOUNT TOTAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT FEES ACTION FORM DATE % ZF 9 APPLICANT NAME PA v- v' A--,--:-. APPLICANT ADDRESS 2 4Y50 w4. TG %°d C-+ �7 ;-6 i PERMIT NUMBER U K . PM RECEIPT NUMBERC S =� CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CODE ACCOUNT NUMBER Agreement/Covenant Construction Exempt Organizations Grading Plancheck Grading Inspection Final Map Processing Parcel Map Processing Permanent Encroachment Improvement Plancheck Improvement inspection Temporary Encroachment Street Vacation Street Name Change A.P.N. Report Security Deposit TOTAL Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /Oct151998 6. -00 ,00 �" P AC 101-0000 - 3450100 CN 101 -0000- 3450200 EX 101 - 0000 - 345 -0400 oZ� x{00 , 00 GR 101-0000345 -0700 GI 101 -0000 - 3450800 FM 101-0000 - 3450500 3 , 3 00 , 00 PM 101. 0000 -345 -0600 PE 101-0000 - 345.1100 IR 101-0000 -345 -0900 II 101 -0000- 3451000 TE 101- 0000345 -1200 VA 101-0000 -345 -1500 SN 101-0000-3451300 PN 101- 0000.3452100 CASHIER: SEE NOTES ON BACK TOTAL Permit Coordinator KC /jsg /Oct151998 6. -00 ,00 �" P ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSAACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR I TO BE COMPLETED BY CASHIER I 1:1Xd4IS111P11L51-11:I CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS A 11*16MIi CASHIER CODE = ED ECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED PROJECT NUMBER FIELD I PROJECT i I TOTAL ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE = SY PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN) PROJECT f AMOUNT TOTAL TRANSNUTTAL FORM City of Encinitas FAX 760/633 -2818 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Engineering Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 760/633 -2770 DATE �� SEND TO FAX # NO. OF PAGES:6— TO: 7F55� R- C }frLEv OF: ADDRESS: FROM:j��'S PHONE: (760) 633- �o ❑ Call ASAP ❑ ❑ Please Handle Review & Call Per Our Conversation ❑ Review & Return ❑ F.Y.I. ❑ Please Reply by CON04ENTS: �Qs,�E's r�f�S � /�� /w . � yc�fe y�G,�✓ Gr�a.7�i' ........................... ............................... TRANSMISSION RESULT REPORT .................... (APR 20 '00 10:OOAM) CIT ENCINITAS ............................................................................................................................. ............................... (AUTO) .... THE FOLLOWING FILE(S) ERASED FILE FILE TYPE OPTION TEL NO. PAGE RESULT 017 MEMORY TX 919497241338 11/11 OK ERRORS 1) HANG UP OR LINE FAIL 2) BUSY 3) NO ANSWER 4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION TRANSNUTTAL FORM City of Encinitas FAX 760/633 -2818 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Engineering Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 760/633 -2770 DATE SEND TO FAX #:? ' / ;77�ql -S-? N0. OF PAGES:_/z- TO: TEsse- R. OF: ADDRESS: _ FROM: ��5'� PHONE: (760) 63$- D Rm- TO: OF: TRANSMITTAL FORM City of Encinitas FAX 760/633 -2818 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Engineering Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 760/633 -2770 �yzO -ems SEND TO FAX #:� ��✓�3 -3y° NO. OF PAGES:_/z- .TEs5E R 0111r4-el- ADDRESS: FROM: S" !� J� PHONE: (760) 633- 07-60 ❑ Call ASAP ❑ Review & Call ❑ Please Handle JV Per Our Conversation CONOAENTS: /U / /vw ❑ Review & Return ❑ F.Y.I. ❑ Please Reply by Tr t-lar 1-77e 99'1341 . -,' a'o 471o, /ee F 5 a/- vaa cern S letter of transmittal DATE: April 4, 2000 JOB#: 4460 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING. INC. y Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 4 Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX: 760 943 -8236 F, TO: ATTENTION: Tamara City Of Encinitas Engineering Counter 305 S. Vulcan Avenue RE: TPM 98-139 SUBJECT: Final Print Package Submittal COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 3 shts Sewer Plan Original Mylars 3 1 3 shts Grading Plan Original Mylars fYjz'(y 1 5 shts Improvement plan Original Mylars loO�s'G 5 3 shts Sewer Plan Bluelines 4 3 shts Grading Plan Bluelines 4 5 shts Improvement plan Blueliness Please call if you have any questions or if you need anything additional, Thank You! �Q e �IC l_a ✓�Lf By: Steve Crosby P.E., Project Engineer EA JEERING SERVICES DEPARML PLANCHECK CONSULTANT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: SUBDIVISON ENGINEERING DMSION; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SECTION T JOHN POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. O 175 CALLE MAGDALENA, SUITE 101 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 1 iA' ATTENTION: �l w.jr'Q Q� e.o DATE: 3 20 00 Regarding (Finance Number DEPOSI �� ®TM/MUP/MM/DR: (Finance Number (Finance Number (.075 6+1 EPOSI APN: 2- y —D9I—S Transmitted as following: O6,'Z A K FEE comments/Additional Space for Document 0 tl Final Parcel Map K Final Map ❑ �Amended/Cotrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ® Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ® Checkprint ® Original ® Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM K Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ Copies 0t <documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed 6) Copies to: 4, d Traverse Calculations p Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Addition p] Notes: Corporate /Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ FX `tr� % e 5 ��y.� v. t .e Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: • ( CD/ CS/ FIREfSDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &FJr /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Mainz. ❑ ❑ Improvement Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ® Original Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ bk /Private) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Road/Dminage /Wa ter/ rail/Park/Facility) 54 ',, P ^./ Gr` Grading Plan S UPIan Change/As-built Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc' ❑ 6 062, 5't ' V, Pv} , 12 A , Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint K Original Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Ma lim, /Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. sion Co Planting & Irrigation) Pursuant to Uwe terms of our contract with your firm, we request professional plan check services for the aforementioned plans andror supporting documentation. If you have my comments• questions, or need additional information, please give us a call at (760) 633 -2776. A — r� f Originator: oof % 5 I Position: —04 r GG to , 505 South Vulcan Avenue; Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG/ARR/PIn_Cons.dW02.11.99 1 of I :1 letter of transmittal DATE: March 20, 2000 JOB# 4460 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 41 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX: 760 943 -8236 TO: ATTENTION: Blair City Of Encinitas Engineering Counter 305 S. Vulcan Avenue RE: TPM 98 -139 SUBJECT: Final Submittal COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Sewer Plan Original Mylars 1 Grading Plan Original Mylars 1 Improvement plan Original Mylars 1 Parcel Map Original Mylars 1 Original Check Prints 1 Covenant Blair, The map and plans have been revised to show reservation for future private road easement. Bill Weedman asked that these be sent to you directly, then you would forward to him as appropriate. Please call if you have any questions, Sincerely; By: Steve Crosby P.E., Project Engineer EN EERING SERVICES DEPARTME. Capital Improvement Projects District SuPPOn Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) E] District Support Services ( _D) C] Office of the Director (N 1) � Field Operations (FO) ❑ T �jEkN (�J(jU1T0 LNGfKEE72tf.1G+ O ATTENTION: Ca4pSM4 G O S 552 DATE: O Z 2-t /CYW Regarding (Finance Number 66& Z P DEPOSIT/ IUP /DR: /39 (Finance Number 0 (oZ CaOL)DEPOSIT/gr�' " 04*cu' e 1L'jlWFiOWq"r " /F j (Finance Number L9C 5 -3(<011 AP s¢ — 0°J / — SB Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map Final Map ❑ r� Check (Type) (Check) �ppfx, ved Co y f ICertifi ate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report Traverse Calculations Reference Maps ❑ Comments/Additional Space for Document: Interoffice Memorandum• Plancheck Co ts'� SEE NO onr MAP ME : Ace43s Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: _ ❑ E AS PA vKrr. Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ ' (Staff / Consultant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Sketch (if needed): Agreement re: Pvt. Rd. Maint. —1 Improvements ' IPyl :40UIL1 -il COMAWt4.V�TS Ii vate Improvement Plan Check proved Copy/Qti ejected Plancheck Comments* j mage/W r/Sewe iVP k/Facility) Intermediate Description: - - Grading Plan W Check Plan Change Description: ec r' proved Copt jetted Plancheck Comments* LAaAw<<wt'C (M liminary/Precise) Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Repo Hydrology Study/Map a Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ o lanting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Revie Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction EL Comrysnt ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return Please call: TG o (033 289 if necessary Originator. -FArM A$-A 0'n1 t`" r Copies to: rt LE V Messenger ❑ Mail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ I Received by: Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG/ARR/Cenenc_Tnm.docM.11.99 1 of I Ei NEERINC SERVICES DEPARTAf. F PLANCHECK CONSULTANT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital 4npiovemenl Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Sulxivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: SUBDIVISON ENGINEERING DIVISION; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SECTION T JOHN POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. O 175 CALLE MAGDALENA, SUITE 101 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 ATTENTION: LO 0 DATE: 2 O / / Regarding (Finance Number 900*5 - DEPOSIT P/MIN/DR: °1 8 - l 39 ��.�_ (Finance Number b'«= - DEPOSIT iC a .1 (Finance Number /FEE APN: 2644 -091 - 5X Transmitted as following: 69� 66 Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map 9 Final Map Q �mm l/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed ® Corrected ❑ Approved 0 Interoffice Memo* ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ® Checkprint ® Original ® Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/TPM N Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ka Guarantee N Tax Certifi cate 5) Other GkGG k r+ w } veS Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title repo es n Dee ® 6) Copies to: i Traverse Calculations Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: ^ e- Corpomte/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ 4t w .� s Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: E] ( .� % n C t` s i .ti Legal Description O Plat C) Recording Fee N ❑ -- i6x i r.L, e. o P i e s e U 1z 15 d• G$ Easement re: Covenant re: • (CD /CS/ FIRE /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &E/-r /CATV) rove Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Im rovements ❑ Sewer Park Impa Drainage ❑ A ❑ Sketch (if needed jl� /_ Descrptionn: -6r GSP WP'rJ r`4v 1'^n Agreement re: t rlj tint. `C� o� ES �w~d: �o �vredne.clawew Improvements ❑ Pvt. R ® hb 8'3 Gsax�. �t3L i01 Improvement Plan ® ✓ /Plan Change/As -Built Proposed ® Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ g Nes. D ae. Blueline/Red -lined ® Checkprint ® Original Pr, ,de ncr- w/ r-.-4,1 •4- 9!4 ee'"d` Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations O Cost Estimate O (lu'Pri_ v ig"kei Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road / Drainage /Watet�/TraiVPark/Facility) 6� y w}. amt. �� y Grading Plan ® /Plan Change /As -built Proposed B Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc • ❑ 40v-9 6% IZ jtt^ ✓ Q� Blueline/Red -lined a Checkprint � Original ® +0 -�-' L �� Lb�� Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report Letter rc: Permission to Grade ❑ . Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rou h/KPrecise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( son o l/Planting & Irrigation) Pursuant to the terms of our contract with your firm, we request professional plan check services for the aforementioned plans and/or supporting documentation. If you have any comments, questions, r recd additional information, please give us a call at (760) 633 -2776. �o y� S $ r Position: !!:ffr'r e-& � Originator: x 0 Y 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 fSG/ARR/Pln Com.doc/02.11.99 1 of I e T letter of transmittal date February 11, 2000 job#: 4460 San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. Planners - Engineers - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 - 753-5525 FAX: 760 - 943 -8236 TO: City of Encinitas ATTN: Blair Knoll RE: TPM 98 -139 - TPM and Improvement Plans SUBJECT: Final Submittal for Approval ITEM DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 1 6075G for signature (mylar) 2 1 CS -315 for signature (mylar) 3 1 6062 -G for signature (mylar) 4 2 6075 -G bluelines w/ original checkprints 5 2 CS -315 bluelines w/ original checkprints 6 2 6062 -G bluelines w/ original checkprints 7 1 City of Escondido Encroachment Permit 8 1 Drainage Study 9 1 TPM Reference Copy 10 5 ea 6075G, CS -315, 6062 -G for Cardiff Sanitation Agenda Blair, Thank you for all your assistance in processing this map to coordinate with the Cardiff Sanitation Agenda on Feb. 23, 2000! FEB 1 121110 1 ' ENGINE ER ENCINRVIICES Cheryl Ehlers, Director of Project Processing letter of transmittal date February 11, 2000 job#: 4460 San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. Planners - Engineers - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 - 753 -5525 FAX: 760 - 943 -8236 T0: City of Encinitas ATTN: Blair Knoll RE: TPM 98 -139 - TPM and Improvement Plans SUBJECT: Final Submittal for Approval ITEM DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 1 TPM for signature (mylar) 2 5 TPM bluelines for Final Map 3 5 TPM's for Cardiff Sanitation Agenda (folded) 4 1 Vicinity Map 5 1 pkg Off map conditions (remaining) SEE NEXT IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHT FOR >> Thank you for all your assistance in processing this map to coordinate with the Cardiff Sanitation Agenda on Feb. 23, 2000! L B I ENGINEERING ES OF ENCIN TAS Cheryl Ehlers, Director of Project Processing February 11, 2000 San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. Satisfaction of Off Map Conditions To Date TPM 98 -139 Final Map Standard /Specific Condition Condition HW6 Non Objection (Map signature) Easement WORK cl Covenant - TPM and Minor Use Permit Tax Clearance Certificate Parcel Map Guarantee Title Report NAD83 Ties Check Prints Coordinates File Encroachment Permit Documentation Attached Copy of Negative Declaration dated 2/22/99. Per our conversation 10/7/99 w /Tamara Neal, this is satisfied City Escondido - Non - objection Ltr. dated 11/15/99 and 9/22/99 NON - RESPONSIVE, Do Not Object Copy of Grant Deed, Recorded 01/13/00 Maintenance Agreement with recording fees Dated 1/28/00 with recording fees Dated 2 12 /00 12/02/99 12/02/99 Enclosed Under separate cover Enclosed Copy from City of Escondido L (c; f� 5W� ( 0► 1D ENW EERINC SERVICES DEPARTML Capital Improvement Projects -� District Support Services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering traffic Engineenng TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) E] � District Support Services ( _D) E] Office of the Director (#I) Field Operations (FO) ❑ T -5k� pleUrm EW- Ak"WA111 (a. O ATTENTION: SZ1 VE CROSt %1" -IUD • 1S3 2S DATE: I 3 Regarding (Finance Number �� 31 E SI /I�IIN/DR: �- l3°1 (Finance Number &Q4 - G SI �t ur ldL 0i— " (Finance Number &0(02 - DEPOSI APN: 1_!.� - 09l -Sg Transmitted as following: Other Application: CD Final Parcel Map 0 Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) .0 }ttknrbCPApproved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations Reference Maps,] Comments/Additional Space for Document: interoffice Memorandum' ❑ Plancheck Comments' ©w Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other: ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ •(Staff/ Consultant /CD/Fire/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Sketch (if needed): Agreement re: C exezovm) f 1 f�'` �1 G� (7p/1�I�iL Improvements ❑ PvL Rd. Maint. o ct�oc� f , 1 �j — ✓ A aO WA 9a-WC% F796-1&x Far^S �� 12r V 1Sfc PRM AA rIA M AS VJbf o T-A l t �X t Plan FA 3 `� Check Check rin Approved Copy/Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments' Publi rate aina¢e/Wat /Sewe rai k/Facility) Intermediate Description: aooR -4ss �.w.w�.�s i P [� �✓ -Check Plan Change Description: heckprmtl proved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments* C AppR -t�SS CoMwttGt�ti o liminary/Precise) Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Hydrology Study/Map Ja Cross Sections [D Exhibit: ❑ (Erosion Contro lanting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation E] My /your inquiry C] Our Review Our Inquiry E] Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction [7ff /Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return t-'em 6•t1NE, J mus �Y:l A S Please call: -It. O (033 • Z ?219 if necessary Originator: TA%V.AXXh, p'1+4 5V%—A . Copies to: F1 Lie V Messenger ❑ Mail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ I Received by: Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG/ARR/Gcnc is Trans.doc/02.l l.99 I of t letter of transmittal DATE: November 9, 1999 JOB#: 4460 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX: 760 943 -8236 City Of Encinitas Engineering Counter 305 S. Vulcan Avenue RE: TPM 98 -139 SUBJECT: Additional information for Submittal for V plan check COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Hydrology Report Here is the additional copy of the hydrology report that you request U D Please call if you need additional info OV — y Sincerely, ENGINEERING CITY OF ENCINT AI; By: Steve Crosby P.E., Project Engineer EAOVEERING SERVICES DEPAR T1 PLANCHECK CONSULTANT TRANSMITTAL FORM Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering FROM: SUBDIVISON ENGINEERING DIVISION; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SECTION T JOHN POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. O 175 CALLE MAGDALENA, SUITE 101 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 (j % ATTENTION: B r2 t �o` `e DATE: l r! Regarding (Finance Number DL S 315) pE D /FEE (S�TM/MUP/MIN/DR: - 3 R /—e' (Finance Number 6p� - ! (�) DEPOSIT Oa (S �G 7 {�/r ��% or7 w —" (Finance Number 01- - P_M DEPOSIT "N: 2d 9/ ' 5 8 Transmitted as following: Comments/Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ® Final Map Sljmi Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck Proposed ® Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ® Checkprint ® Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/fPM F2�] Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ® Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other 6 itiecle 4c ; . 4r- Doc s Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: l e Traverse Calculations (E Reference Maps ® Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate /Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter" ❑ '— 5.D.6. — Co r r e s o o,n e- • c e L c'i 4 %rs rower Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ r kf x 2 Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee N ❑ Easement re: Cove ant re: • (CD /CS/FIRFJSDWD/ CWD/ ,�c /Lf(2n Highway E] Trail E3 provements ® Sewer ❑ Park Impact Fees ® Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ssessments ® Agreement re: TwP. �tv � o �/P�, Improvements ❑ I Rd. M ' t. ® 7ald /f. less® _ p wv� L co V7 et ro �og7 Improvement Plan ® u mt Ian Change /As -Built Proposed© Corrected❑ Approved Mfg.Specs.❑ Cnl(ecf Be'rs- Nivn5ovt Blueline/Red -lined ® Checkprint ® Original ❑ Structural Calculations Cost Estimate �-e /W A . %` 9 97 »t Publ' Cross Sections ❑ ❑ ❑ ) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. ( Road /Dr�elWater Xrail/Park/Facility) 6062 et rz 3,'O - P'J }, "' Grading Plan ® -3 fd Su'&mt�tt�/a Plan Change/As -built Proposed ® Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc' ❑ 6675 U p^d rn rPdi r Blueline/Red -lined ® Checkprint ® Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map �] Cost Estimate ❑k X2. Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rou /Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. stop Contro lanling & Irrigation) Pursuant to the terms of our contract with your firm, we request professional plan check services for the aforementioned plans and/or supporting documentation. If you have any comments, questions, or need additional information, please give us a call at (760) 633 -2776. L Originator: a 5S f Position:ti 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 2600/FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG/ARR/Pln_Com.doc/02.11.99 I of I M letter of transmittal DATE: November 5, 1999 JOB #: 4460.00 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX: 760 943 -8236 YZe71c1F1172fine II RE: TPM 98 -139 SUBJECT: 3" Submittal COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 7/08/99 3 1" Check Print 1 10/17/99 3 20° Check Print 1 10/21/99 11 Off Map Conditions 1 17 Closures 2 11/05/99 6 Blue Lines 1 Reference Maps I, -5i, RING SERVICES THANK YOU, By: Andrew G. Karydes, P.L.S. letter of transmittal DATE: November 5, 1999 JOB# 4460 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX: 760 943 -8236 TO: Blair/Tamara O'neal City Of Encinitas Engineering Counter 305 S. Vulcan Avenue RE: TPM 98 -139 SUBJECT: Submittal for 210 plan check COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Original Check Prints 2 Revised plans Submittal for third plan check. Sincerely; Please call if you have any questions. `u 1 r� II 5 SEpVIC£S £NCINII•A'S By: Steve Crosby P.E., Project Engineer 14006 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP.9RTMEw f Capital Improvemen' Projects \ District Support 'ervices Feld Operations Subddvision Engineering iroffic Engineering TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (#1) Field Operations (FO) ❑ T ��re.eJ Q tt' RD taNCytt �tilrlet n, p ATTENTION: STeJCC C.¢oscist SSZS'- DATE: /4p/& /44 � �s - 3 ►s oet�srt- Regarding (Finance Number (v0/o2 - n!!►)DEPOSIT� �UP/M1N/DR `iS - M9 (Finance Number (sOG2 - daf-) DEPOSIT (Finance Number 11ot7-11�-- DEPOSITA== , APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: ao Fins ap �F'inal Map ❑ Z Check (Type) (Check) ecpproved Copy I Original I Certificate / Rejected oary e Rep ort [yTraverse Calculations JR Reference Maps ® Comments/Additional Space for Document: Interoffice Memorandum' ® Plancheck Comments* ® it RACthSE -tor EuaAWAaM Cs 240tt 1cr. 0►1 "WAA- %*10G!X P.' CE - OIE- S.JOTMc� Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other. ❑ A%7VLACAXl.0I t fbr- A E1L-11tt- t-JlJP Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ® CIO _ • (Staff/Consultant WDD/ /LCWD) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ® Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments t Sketch (if needed): S 7 : yE 6 Agreement re: iiot.o ti twyDR Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. C4 �� J �, bS GasNhsAA ,e2aSAS 1 Public 'vat I Emen Isn® Z'3' Check hecoved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments' GCMAtAw oad/Drainage/Wate ewer/f il/Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: Gir ® Z Check Plan Change Description: eck pproved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments',@ S [ptittAt SeE t�oLt� 4T (M inary cise) Structural Calculations ❑ CostEstimateo Soil Report ❑ Hydrology Study/Map [2 Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ ( osion Control ' g & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ®' Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction W C mment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return 6LITS (+VZ OUS y %- CLtvj%S Please call: -t C) (033 2-939 if necessary Originator: TA,MAA+Rp O' L01l Copies to: F%1 E _ V Messenger ❑ Mail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ I Received by: Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG/ARR/Oemric Tratts.due/02.11.99 1 of 1 1A, i ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Cmplol Vnprovement Projects District Suppwi Sendces Feb Operoiions Subdivision Engineering TrvMc Engineering TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services C—D) Q Office of the Director (#I) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ 'I' �JP/1 1 /IiAV.y�O L I'1Cc� a .errs- i " p ATTENTION: DATE: Q' Regarding (Finance Number (e 0 (a 2 - DEPOSITIFEE P/fM/ MUP R: q 139 (Finance Number (OO& Z - na ) DEPOSIT/FEE (Finance Number tbr.5 - 31, ) DEPOSITIFEE APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy of Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Comments/Additional Space for Document: Interoffice Memorandum• ❑ Plancheck Comments* ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park Cl Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ p Assessments ❑ •( Staf DComsultant /CD/Fve/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): Agreement re: n Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ (, Goordsno+It �r P',PQrOUr�. Improvement Plan ❑ Check Checkprint/Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments• ❑ (Public/Private) (Road/Dreinage/ Water /SewertTmiVParkfFaci lity) Intermediate Description: Grading Plan� 5 P" Check Plan Change Description: Check ' t/Approved Copy(Origi a VRRe�cted Plan eec Comments* • ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Structural Cakulatioa+ ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Hydrology Study/Map ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: ❑ (Erosion ControVPlanting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correct Q Comment C] Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please re Please call: if necessary Originator, Copies to: V Messenger ail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ I Receivedby: Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024-3633 TEL (760) 633- 2770/FAX (760) 633 -2818 or TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SUARR/Gcnenc Tra dod02 11 .99 1 of letter of transmittal DATE: September 21, 1999 JOB# 4460 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX: 760 943 -8236 TO: Tony Rossi City Of Encinitas Engineering Counter 305 S. Vulcan Avenue RE: TPM 98 -139 SUBJECT: Additional information for Submittal for 2n0 plan check COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Hydrology Report Here is the additional copy of the hydrology report that you regl.leoed. D Please call if you need additional info I „ I S& 2 I Sincerely, u U ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINIrAS By: Steve Crosby P.E., Project Engineer L INEERING SERVICES DEPARTb T Capital Improvement Projects District Support services Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering PLANCHECK CONSULTANT TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: SUBDIVISON ENGINEERING DIVISION; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SECTION T JOHN POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. O 175 CALLE MAGDALENA, SUITE 101 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 ATTENTION: _T._.--,r e-V A, I` Q l DATE: Regarding (Finance Number - kM ) DEPOSIT �M /M[IP/MIN DR: 3 '1ci " (Finance Number DLS " o^kle.1 W, 1o� wtr (Finance Number 6Db - GL IQ) DEPOS 114M APN: Transmitted as following: (�D rj FEE Comments/Additional Space for Document ^N� �8122;NaAmended/Corrected Final Parcel Map ® Final Map ❑ 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ Proposed 0 Corrected El Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo' ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined 5� Checkprint 5� Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/CPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street N1ame Change Application El Preliminary Title Report F1 Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other 6 Ner. �-p v Pwi- �cwsaa.ti s Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ 6) Copies to: 1,1 P- Traverse Calculations ® Reference Maps ® Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter• ❑ �Uvt Sf� vtB.� 1Vtcwt.o s �4) Deferred Monumentation Letter ® Agency Letter: [J e No t w Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ t c t i . Cc( Z-KA 68 Easement re: Covenant re: • (CD /CS/FIREJSDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G& / ATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ f Q� IIss Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ / ij` /7 /A►�%, 9 e- 2't/ N Improvement Plans rUPlan Change /As -Built Proposed g] Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Mfg. Specs. ❑ Blueline/Red -lined S Checkprint © Original ❑ Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate blt /Private Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Roa&/ rainage/Wategs TraiVPark/Facility) Grading Plan (o N "lan Change/As -built Proposed ® Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ cc • ❑ (,075 do YZ 7 2Nd r Blueline/Red -lined ® Checkprint ® Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ® Cost Estimate 4 Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. o ton 1/Planting & Irrigation) Pursuant to the terms of our contract with your firm, we request professional plan check services for the aforementioned plans and/or supporting documentation. If you have any comments, questions, or need additional information, please give us a call at (760) 633 -2776. Originator: K AV�okti,'J O Sy t Position: e- C- 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /ARR/P1n Cons.doJ02.l l.99 I of I letter of transmittal DATE: September 17, 1999 JOB* 4460 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING. INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors ct 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX: 760 943 -8236 TO: Blair/Tamara O'neal City Of Encinitas Engineering Counter 305 S. Vulcan Avenue RE: TPM 98 -139 SUBJECT: Submittal for 2`" plan check COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Original Check Prints 2 Revised plans z 1 revised Hydrology IMWrt 1 T i revised Cost Esti — [m 05 Ion F Submittal for second plan check. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, By: Steve Crosby P.E., Project Engineer letter of transmittal DATE: September 17, 1999 JOB #: 4460.00 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 753 -5525 FAX: 760 943 -8236 1[OA:IE4I22WH RE: TPM 98 -139 SUBJECT: 2n° Submittal COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 1" Check Print 2 Blue lines 1 Reference Maps 1 Monumentation Bond Le 1 Calculations THANK YOU, By: Andrew G. Karydes, P.L.S. EA ✓EERING SERVICES DEPARTM Copital Improvement Projects District Support Services Feld Operations Subdvision Engineering Traffic Engineering TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ® Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T SAt%i O -1 ea D • -%'91- SY2t ATTENTION: 3ARWf 1 +l J n+iU11 DATE: Regarding (Finance Number Gob 2 - 4Q_ ) DEPOSIT �/MUP/MIN/DR: OM - t %c? (Finance Number (4042- - (-M) DEPOSIT4= 04y_ Lto� tW W r�diJ HJ� (ip r " (Finance Number ()C-S - 3t T) YWATIdWil APN: Transmitted as following: Other Application: F(na l Map [f Final Map ❑ 1sT `� Check (Type) (Check) ec / Approved Copy / Original / Certificate / Rejected Preliminary Title Report tC ;raverse Calculations ® Reference Maps ents/Additipnal S� for Document: Interoffice Memorandum* t�1 Planchec n T. o- )W49a Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Other. t Y 1 Easement re: Covenant . Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ • (StafT/Consultan C MWD CWD) Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ C Sketch (if needed): t 5 Agreement re: n , Improvements C] Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ El 4 GALrltti(L1 (Z1cGli�s ARAr�+ut2p Soamyy- ('t.►T 1 U"r[,Ati- 94r. fab 4t00^WJA-(AG Fjkatt -tTy At&4eU^4M Wr . c~"0zrS Improvement Plan CW (sT Check k rin roved Copy /OriginaVRejected Plancheck Comments' ,LOOPA_b%S CC<+wtvuWW%. SJRattT' Pf. b ' vate oad ge/Water /Sew VPark/Facility) �' Intermediate Description: L05T 01T Fz�R�tawVtllL Grath Plaa ® l`T✓ Check plan Change Description: eck ' Approved Copy /Original/Rejected Plancheck Comments" _A00A4L'S% 9-0j%St tky0gQLQW I /Preciu) S-TJO,4 Cost Estimate t2 Soil Repo Structural Calculations C] [� Hydrology Study/Map ® Cross Sections ❑ Exhibit: Eli Orosion ontro anting k Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review T Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval ❑ For your... Correction [} Comment ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return 2 9CCS SLAOESr ertECttQRtr*tS Please call: 'ICAO t.'I'l 'LS-IT if necessary Originator. 'CAuAA N,& O'rJ CY1r�� Copies to: PILE V Messenger ❑ Mail ❑ Facsimile ❑ Other ❑ I Received by: Date: A Title: Location: Telephone: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2919 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG/ARR/Generic Tsam.dod02.11.99 I of I B Ei VEERING SERVICES DEPARTA . Capitol Improvement Projects -� District Support Services Field Operorions Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ® Traffic Engineering (TE) District Support Services (_D) Office of the Director (N]) 0 Field Operations (FO) T Community Development- Current Planning O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: vl San Dieeuito Water District - Engineering & Planning AP Community Services - Parks & Beaches DATE: 8 Regarding (Finance Number 4062 - _A!!-) DEPOSIT /FtfED ( /'I-M/MUP/MIN/DR: 18 (Finance Number A04X- — )DEPOSIT E " tea%& &0 Zw.'1 Vswer 0r (Finance Number OG5 - 315 PO /FEE APN: 76 N — n'?/ Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map tg Final Map � Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / ew r Revised Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff/ Consu ltant /CD/Fre /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): oa a e Water /Se_ ^_er/fraiVPark/Facility) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan S Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / ew r Revised G—_._ r ading Plan C9 �! � �� Chec,rk, Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original �r Revised 406 ;LGtYL 7 / sue '- Plan Change Description: 4075 6,12 =2 IS (Mass/Roug unm Precise) ono lancing & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review Our Inquiry EJ Our Approval For your... Correction E) Comment ® Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses El Please return a+,11n 2 wGLk- 5 Please call: ,29 3 if necessary Originator: Bt-40 r KKVI1 Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 JSG /ARR/Inter Trans. doc/03.02.99 1 of I E INEERING SERVICES DEPARTA. T Capital Improvement Projects �� District Support services Field Operations sutocWsion Engineering Trotfic Engineering INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ® Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ T Community Development - Current Planning (� I, O Fire -Fire Prevention ATTENTION: VAvt {N loo y'e San Dieeuito Water District- Eneineerine & Planning Community Services - Parks & Beaches DATE: 8 Regarding (Finance Number 4062- - 6n YZ.) DEPOSIT/I�F (Finance Number dlO(lo;L - pM)DEPOSIT (Finance Number DC5 31 5 P)/FEE Transmitted as following: Final Parcel Map 5?1 Final Map ❑ 5 f Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / ew r Revised P� TM /MUP/MIN/DR: " 0 ak/C:{ /Wi �sw�r Or APN: Z6 N - OQ/ - S 8 Other Application: (Type) (Check) Comments/Additional Space for Document: • ( Staff/Consultant /CD/Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): oa am e/ Water /Se_Ter/Trail/Park/Facility) Intermediate Description: Improvement Plan J s Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / ew r Revised - - -- Grading Plan �� C,hec,,k, Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original Cdr Revised Plan Change Description: �o75671z (Mass/Rough /P Imm recise) on Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval For your... Correction Comment ® Signature Information E] Uses ❑ Please return a✓,'n 2 t e-r L5 Please call: z7g3 if necessary Originator: F31l 40 r KtAy I I Copies to: 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SOARRflnter_Trms.doc/03.02. 99 1 of I SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEER_ ^, INC. Planners - Engineers - SuC^�.;, `rs 4407 Manchester Ave. Suid'05 ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 PHONE (619) 753-5525 FAX (619) 943-8236 TO Cif-LJ_ R'. 4I 0 WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via r Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ LG44C @IF ETn/R 3W0VU&1L S 3271 C Samples the following items: Specifications THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: �. ATTENTION �! �'. ie _• 1 I u.f ❑ For your use • As requested • TOTAL C Samples the following items: Specifications THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use • As requested • For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS E Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit ❑ Submit ❑ Return _ —copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED. Pill ( A If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. letter of transmittal date June 21, 1999 job #: 4460 San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. Planners - Engineers - Surveyors 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 - 753-5525 =AX: 760 - 943 -8236 TO: City of Encinitas - Engineering Department ATTN:Jeff Garami RE: TPM 98.139 SUBJECT: Ist SUBMITTAL - Street Improvements - OAKLEY ITEM DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 5 Grading Plan for Wildflower Drive 2 5 Grading Plan for Lots 3 2 Engineers Cost Estimate for Wildflower Drive 4 2 Engineers Cost Estimate for Lots 5 2 Hydro logy /H drauf Con RR s 6 2 7 2 Soils Wrt Set 8 2 Tent aps MIXFi Thank you for processing the 15' Submittal CITY OF ENO Sincerely, Cheryl Ehlers Director of Project Processing z &M �llE tiHtr i✓ CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 505 So. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 (760)633 -2710 AMENDED NOTICE OF DECISION DCD 99 -07 February22,1999 Note: This Notice of Decision has been amended to reflect chap eg s to specific conditions of Oproval. Condition HW6 has been added pursuant to Section 711.4 of the State Fish and Game Code. This letter is to inform you that the Director of Community Development has approved the application for: 98 -139 TPM/NIIN/EIA (Oakley): Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Use Permit and Environmental Initial Assessment to create a four lot subdivision with a remainder parcel for a 11.37 + /- acre property located towards the southerly end of Wildflower Drive and southwest of Wildflower Estates. (Portions of APN 264- 091 - 16,17,19). Project Description and Discussion: The proposed project is the subdivision of an 11.37 + /- acre parcel known as the "Oakley property". The project site is located in a semi - rural section of Olivenhain. The site consists of gently sloping topography that has historically been cleared and used for animal grazing and horse - related functions. The project area was part of Boundary Adjustment application involving 7 legal lots (97 -131 BA, Mayo, et al) that was approved by the Community Development Department on July 18, 1997. The tentative parcel map and minor use permit would create lots with the following lot sizes: Parcel Lot Size/Gross Lot Area/Net Parcel 2.72/acres 2.70 /acres Parcel 2.05 /acres 1.95 /acres Parcel 3.18 /acres 2.66 /acres Parcel 1.63 /acres 1.36 /acres Remainder 1.79 /acres 1.64 /acres The applicant has designed the project to utilize lot area averaging in order to create lots with usable pads outside the existing constraints, which include sloping topography and crn/v98139TPM.DGD 13 the Escondido Sewer Outfall easement. The underlying zoning, which is Rural Residential, calls for minimum lot sizes of 2 acres. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 30.16.020 A(1), lot area averaging for subdivisions creating four (4) or fewer lots in a residential zone may be approved pursuant to a minor conditional use permit. This proposed subdivision yields an average lot size of 2.06 acres. The applicant will dedicate and improve a 10' -wide recreational trail easement adjacent to Wildflower Valley Drive that will be consistent with the City's adopted Interim Recreational Trails Standards. An Environmental Initial Assessment and Negative Declaration has been prepared for the City of Encinitas by the environmental consulting firm of Englehom & Associates. According to the Initial Study, the project could not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be prepared. The applicant has submitted service availability letters indicating that all required services are available for the project site. A standard 300 ft. / 100 ft. radius public notification was issued, with minimal comments being received by the community. No letters of concern or objection were received by Planning staff. FINDINGS Tentative Parcel Map: This approval is subject to the following findings for Tentative Parcel Map. 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451 of the Subdivision Map Act since the project is in conformance with the General Plan designation (RR) for the site and no Specific Plan is applicable. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and any specific plans since the project is in conformance with the General Plan designation (RR) for the site. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the intended residential type of development because in terms of lot size, shape, setbacks and access the subdivision will adequately accommodate existing future development of single family dwellings. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development since the subdivision will conform to the density limitations of the RR Zone. crW48139TPM.DCD E That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project consists of a minor subdivision within an urbanized area. No significant natural resources are present on the site. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, since documentation has been obtained stating that necessary services and utilities shall be available for the site. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. A review of title information did not show any easements on or adjacent to the property, which would be adversely impacted by this application. The subdivision conforms to all the provisions of the Municipal Code including project density, lot size and lot dimensions, as per the information submitted in the subject application. FINDINGS FOR A USE PERMIT STANDARD: In accordance with Section 30.74.070 of the Municipal Code, a use permit application shall be approved unless findings of fact are made, based upon the information presented in the application or during the hearing, which support one or more of the following conclusions: The location, size, design or operating characteristics of the proposed project will be incompatible with or will adversely affect or will be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residences, buildings, structures or natural resources, with consideration given to, but not limited to: a. The inadequacy of public facilities, services and utilities to serve the proposed project; b. The unsuitabilityof the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed; and C. The harmful effect, if any, upon environmental quality and natural resources of the city; Facts: The applicant is proposing a four -lot subdivision with a remainder parcel. As part of this application, the applicant proposes lot area averaging to create lots that are smaller cm/v981397"PUDCD than 2 acres in size. Pursuant to Section 30.16.020 of the Municipal Code, lot area averaging may be proposed and approved through the minor use permit process. Discussion: This proposal will create parcel sizes that range from 1.36 acres/net to 2.98 acres /net. The average lot size will be 2.06 acres which is greater than the 2 -acre minimum lot size for the RR zone. This proposal is compatible with the approved subdivision to the north (Wildflower Estates) which also utilized lot area averaging. Lot sizes in the Wildflower Estates subdivision were approved ranging from 1.5 acres to 2.1 acres. The grading of the parcels proposed for this development will be in substantial conformance with similar estate type lots in the vicinity. Conclusion: The proposed project will be compatible with adjacent large -lot, custom - home developments and subdivisions. Public services will be available for this subdivision. Average lot size will be greater than the two acre minimum lot size required in the RR zone, which is ample area to site a single - family custom home and accessory structures. The pattern of future development will be consistent with adjacent land uses in terms of intensity, grading and density and no harmful effects on the environment or natural resources will occur from this project. 2. The impacts of the proposed project will adversely affect the policies of the Encinitas General Plan or the provisions of the Municipal Code; and 3. The project fails to comply with any other regulations, conditions, or policies imposed by the Municipal Code. Facts:. Pursuant to Chapter 30.16.020 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, a minor residential subdivision is permitted by right in the RR zone while lots designed for residential use may be smaller than that allowed by the underlying zoning with the approval of a minor use permit for lot area averaging. Discussion: The Community Development Department has conducted an analysis of the application and has not identified any significant adverse impacts that could result from the proposed use. A standard public notification was issued, and no negative comments were received by the community. The project has been designed around the policies of the General Plan and development regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance. The slope analysis presented with the application indicates areas of potential grading that are shown on the slope analysis as being in excess of 25% slope. A visual review of the contour lines on the tentative parcel map and a review of the site in the field indicates that the areas shown in excess of 25% are not excessively steep. Also, a slope analysis calculation sheet prepared and certified by the project engineer indicates that the cm1IG8139TPM.DCD El encroachment into the over 25% slope area is less than 10% which is consistent with Municipal Code Section 30.34.030B. Conclusion: Based on Community Development Department analysis, the project has been designed not to create any significant environmental impacts nor will the project adversely affect the policies of the Encinitas General Plan or the provisions of the Encinitas Municipal Code. Environmental Review: The City of Encinitas, having consulted with Englehorn & Associates, has completed an Initial Study of this project in accordance with the City's CEQA Guidelines for the purpose of determining whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment. That Study has determined that the project could not have a significant effect on the environment, therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. CONDITIONS This approval is subject to the following conditions: SCI SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: SC4 Approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and all associated permits will expire on February 22, 2001, at 5:00 PM, two years after the approval of this project, unless the conditions have been met or an extension of time has been approved pursuant to the Municipal Code. SC5 This project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application dated received by the City on June 3, 1998, and Tentative Parcel Map dated received by the City on December 30, 1998, consisting of I sheet, designated as approved by the Community Development Department on February 22, 1999, and shall not be altered without express authorization by the Community Development Department. SCA Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall cause the property to be annexed to the Cardiff Sanitation District to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. HW6 This project has been identified as having a potential impact on fish and/or wildlife; therefore, pursuant to Section 711.4 of the State Fish and Game Code, the applicant must submit to the City of Encinitas a negotiable check in the amount of $1,275.00 if this project includes a Negative Declaration, or a check in the amount of $875.00 if this project includes an Environmental Impact Report. The purpose of the above State cmw98139TPM.DCD 5 established fee is to defray the cost of managing and protecting fish and wildlife resources which may be impacted by the development. The check, made payable to the County Clerk of San Diego County, must be submitted prior to the end of the 4th day following the City's action. Failure to submit a negotiable check will cause the project approval to become null and void since the Notice of Determination can not be filed without payment of this fee or authorized notice of exemption as provided in Section 711.4. NO BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER ENTITLEMENTS WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THIS CONDITION IS SATISFIED. GI STANDARD CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): G5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Municipal Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived herein. G13 The applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, School Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Flood Control Mitigation Fees, Park Mitigation Fees, and Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees. Arrangements to pay these fees shall be made prior to Final Map approvallbuilding permit issuance to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Engineering Services Departments. The applicant is advised to contact the Community Development Department regarding Park Mitigation Fees, the Engineering Services Department regarding Flood Control and Traffic Fees, applicable School District(s) regarding School Fees, the Fire Department regarding Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees, and the applicable Utility Departments or Districts regarding Water and/or Sewer Fees. M I This approval may be appealed to the City Council within 10 calendar days from the date of this approval pursuant to Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code. M2 All project grading shall conform with the approved Tentative Map or Tentative Parcel Map. In cases where no grading is proposed at the time of the Tentative Map/Tentative Parcel Map, or in cases where the grading plan later submitted is not consistent with the approved Tentative Map/Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall be required to obtain a design review permit for grading prior to issuance of grading permits. M4 The property owner /developer shall obtain design review permits through the City for homes to be constructed on the lots resulting from the approved map, as well as all related an"8139TPMDCD site improvements. If the property owner /developer elects to develop the lots resulting from the approved final map as custom homesites, the design review permit requirement may be waived by the Community Development Department pursuant to Section 23.08.030 (7) of the Municipal Code. The property owner /developeris advised to contact the Community Development Department at such time as development of the subject property is planned to determine whether a design review permit will be required. A standard covenant specifying this condition shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder to give constructive notice to future purchasers of the site. M6 Street names shall be approved by the City prior to the recordation of the final map, and street addresses shall be provided by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits. MT The applicant shall dedicate and improve a 10' -wide recreational trail easement commencing at a point approximately 40' easterly of the northwest comer of Parcel 4, then southerly for a distance of approximately 20', then westerly for a distance of approximately 295' to the subdivision boundary. Trail improvements shall meet the City's adopted Interim Recreational Trails Standards. F FIRE CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): F2 ACCESS ROADWAY DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roadways shall have an unobstructed paved width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. EXCEPTION: Access to one (1) single family residence shall not be less than 16 feet of paved width. F4 TURNAROUNDS: All dead -end fine access roadways in excess of 150 feet in length and serving more than four (4) dwelling units shall be provided with a cul-de -sac. The cul -de -sac radius for public streets shall comply with city road standards. Streets constructed to private road standards where a turnaround is required shall have a cul -de- sac with a paved radius of not less than 36 feet. Cul-de -sacs in commercial projects shall comply with City road standards. Alternate types of turnarounds may be considered by the Fire Chief as needed to accomplish the purpose of the Fire Code. F5 GRADE: The gradient for a fire apparatus roadway shall not exceed 20.0 %. Grades exceeding 15.01/o (incline or decline) shall not be permitted without mitigation. Minimal mitigation shall be the installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems for structures accessed by such a roadway. cm/v98139TPM.DCD VA F7 RESPONSE MAPS: Any development that by virtue of new structures necessitates fire hydrants, roadways, or similar features, shall be required to provide a map in a format compatible with current Department mapping services, and shall be charged a reasonable fee for updating all Fire Department response maps. F8 COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS: Prior to the delivery of combustible materials on the project site, water and sewer systems shall satisfactorily pass all required tests and be connected to the public water and sewer systems. In addition, the first lift of asphalt paving shall be in place to provide a permanent all- weather surface for emergency vehicles. Said access shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. F9 POSTING OF ROADWAYS: Emergency access roadways when required shall be properly identified as per Fire Department standards. F10 OBSTRUCTIONS (ACCESS ROADWAYS): All traffic lanes shall be a minimum of 24 feet in width during construction and shall be maintained clear and free of obstructions during construction in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. F11 FIRE HYDRANTS & FIRE FLOWS: The applicant shall provide fire hydrants of a type, number, and location satisfactory to the Encinitas Fire Department. A letter from the water agency serving the area shall be provided that states the required fire flow is available. Fire hydrants shall be of a bronze type. A two -sided blue reflective road marker shall be installed on the road surface to indicate the location of the fire hydrant for approaching fire apparatus. F12 FUEL MODIFICATION ZONES: The applicant shall provide and maintain fire /fuel breaks to the satisfaction of the Encinitas Fire Department. F13 ADDRESS NUMBERS: Address numbers shall be placed in a location that will allow them to be clearly visible from the street fronting the structure. The height of the address numbers shall conform to Fire Department Standards. 1`14 ADDRESS NUMBERS FOR STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF ROADWAY: Where structures are located off a roadway on long driveways, a monument marker shall be placed at the entrance where the driveway intersects the main roadway. Permanent address numbers with height conforming to Fire Department standards shall be affixed to this marker. F15A AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM - SINGLE - FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES: Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system cm/✓98139TPM.DCD D. installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. E1 ENGINEERING CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): E2 All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of building/gradingpermit issuance shall apply. EG1 Grading Conditions EG2 No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the final map. EG3 The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. EG5 No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. EG6 A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate grading permit issued for the borrow or disposal site if located within the city limits. EG7 All newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1. EG8 A soils /geological/hydraulic report (as applicable) shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Such report shall be submitted and approved Prior to final map approval/Prior to building permit issuance /At first submittal of a grading plan, as applicable. EG9 Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the Engineering Services Director for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the Engineering Services Director may impose with regards to the hauling operation. EGI O In accordance with Section 23.24.370 (A) of the Municipal Code, no grading permit shall be issued for work occurring between October Ist of any year and April 15th of the cm/v98139TPM.00D 7 following year, unless the plans for such work include details of protective measures, including desilting basins or other temporary drainage or control measures, or both, as may be deemed necessary by the field inspector to protect the adjoining public and private property from damage by erosion, flooding, or the deposition of mud or debris which may originate from the site or result from such grading operations. ED1 Drainage Conditions ED2 The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and shall construct temporary desiltationkletention basins of type, size and location as approved by the Engineering Services Director. The basins and erosion control measures shall be shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or approved by the Engineering Services Director. The developer shall maintain the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a period of time satisfactory to the Engineering Services Director and shall guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the Engineering Services Director. ED3 A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water originating within the subdivision, and all surface waters that may flow onto the subdivision from adjacent lands, shall be required. Said drainage system shall include any easements and structures as required by the Engineering Services Director to properly handle the drainage. ED5 The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the final map for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan and City of Encinitas Standards as required by the Engineering Services Director. ED6 The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless covenant regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map /any grading or building permit for this project. ED7 Concentrated flows across driveways and/or sidewalks shall not be permitted. ED8 The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from a 100 -year frequency storm under developed conditions is equal to or less than the runoff from a Cmfv98139TPM.DCD 10 storm of the same frequency and duration under existing conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results. ESl Street Conditions ES2 A registered Civil Engineer or a licensed land surveyor shall provide a signed statement that: "The existing private roads of access to the project are within the easements for the benefit of the land division ". ES3 The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the Tentative Map /site development plan. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the Final Map /prior to issuance of any building permit for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. ES4 Reciprocal access and/or maintenance agreements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives or parking areas and maintenance thereof to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director. ES6 In accordance with Chapter 23.36 of the Municipal Code, the developer shall execute and record a covenant with the County Recorder agreeing not to oppose the formation of an assessment district to fund the installation of right -of -way improvements. ES8 The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the Engineering Services Director prior to approval of the Final Map /issuance of any grading or building permit for this project. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Encinitas Standards based on R -value tests. The standard improvement plan check deposit is required. ES9 Some improvements shown on the Tentative Map and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The subdivider shall conform to Municipal Code Section 24.16.070 regarding offsite improvements and acquisition of property interest. EUl Utilities cmlv98139TPM.DCD 11 EU2 The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective utility agencies regarding services to the project. EU3 The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G. & E., Pacific Telephone, and other applicable authorities. EU4 All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including existing utilities unless exempt by the Municipal Code. EU5 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation and undergrounding of existing public utilities, as required. EU7 The design of the division of land shall provide each cable operator an opportunity to construct, install and maintain, on land identified on the map as dedicated to public utility use, any equipment necessary to extend cable television services to each residential parcel in the subdivision. This conditions shall not apply to the conversion of existing dwelling units to condominiums, community apartments, or stock cooperatives. EU8 Subject to all applicable Federal and State laws, statutes and regulations, in the event of multiple cable communication operators desiring to serve new residential developments in which the electric power and telephone utilities are underground, the following procedure shall apply with respect to access to and utilization of underground easements: (a) The developer shall be responsible for contacting and surveying all franchised cable operators to ascertain which operators desire to provide cable television service to the development. The developer may establish a reasonable deadline to receive responses from cable operators. The final tract map shall indicate the cable operator(s) that have agreed to serve the development. (b) If one or more cable operators wish to provide service, they shall be accommodated in the joint utilities trench on a nondiscriminatory shared basis. (c) The developer shall provide at least (10) working days notice of the date that the utility trenches will be open to the cable operators that have agreed to serve the development. (d) Sharing the joint utilities trench shall be subject to compliance with Public Utilities Commission and utility standards. If such compliance is not possible, or if three (3) or more operators desire to provide service to the cm1&98139TPM.DCD 12 development, the developer shall provide a separate trench for the cable television cables, with the entire cost shared among the participating cable operators. With the concurrence of the developer, the affected utilities and the cable television operators, alternative installation procedures, such as the use of deeper trenches, may be utilized, subject to the applicable law. (e) Any cable operator wishing to serve an area where the trenches have been closed shall be responsible for separate trenching and associated costs; provided that if the cable operator was not provided timely written notice of the availability of such trenches, the developer shall reimburse the operator for such costs. EMI Map EM3 This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) phase EM4 This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No building permit shall be issued for the remainder parcel until it is reviewed and approved pursuant to the provisions of Title 24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. This note shall be placed on the final map. In accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code Chapter 1. 12, this decision may be appealed to the City Council within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this determination. The appeal must be filed, accompanied by a $100.00 filing fee, prior to 4:00 PM on the 10th calendar day following the date of this notice of decision. This notice constitutes a decision of the Community Development Department only. Additional permits, including Building Permits, may be required by the Building Department or other City Departments. It is the property owner or applicant's responsibility to obtain all necessary permits required for the type of project proposed. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact Chris Miller at the Community Development Department by telephoning (760) 633 -2718. Sandra Hol er Community Development Director cm/u98139TPM DCD 13 CITY OF ENCINITAS CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT .eeting Date: February 23, 2000 TO: Cardiff Sanitation District BoarTEgineering Ire�Is� -- $ ORYOl1RRECORD; VIA: Kerry L. Miller, District Man FromCityCl2lk FROM: Alan D. Archibald, Director o Services Blair A. Knoll, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of sewer easements as dedicated on the final parcel map of TPM 98 - 139 into the Cardiff Sanitation District and authorize the Clerk of the Board to sign the final map and a covenant to secure the sewer improvements. Subject property is located in Olivenhain, at the southerly terminus of Wildflower Drive and southwest of Wildflower Estates. (APN:264- 091 - 16,17,19) Applicant: Jesse R. Oakley BACKGROUND: On February 22, 1999, the Director of Community Development approved, subject to conditions, Tentative Parcel Map No. 98 -139, a tentative parcel map of a subdivision creating 4 single family residential lots and a remainder parcel in Olivenhain. To serve this project the subdivider has offered to dedicate a public sewer main and easement to the Cardiff Sanitation District. See Exhibit `A' for the vicinity map. Also, see the attached final parcel map for more particulars on easement location. The sewer main will be constructed to district standards. ANALYSIS: An easement has been granted to the Cardiff Sanitation District on the final map for construction, maintenance, and repair of sewer structures. A covenant has been executed by the subdivider to ensure the proposed sewer improvements are constructed, installed and inspected in conformance with district standards for public sewer mains. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors accepts the sewer easement into the Cardiff Sanitation District and authorizes the Clerk of the Board to sign the final map and to sign the covenant to secure the sewer improvements. TCO ar6361.doc/02 -14 -00 At P" 1� W �� hp X00 2 O J EL CaMIN p DEL NpRTE VICINITY MAP NOT- TO -5CALE (I 995 THOMAS BRO. PAGE NO. 1 145, C -5) RANGN �P BUMANN ROAD 0 0 < p rn � rn 70 ENCJNIT, OF SAN DIEGO 98 -139 TPM OAKLEY MINOR SUBDIVISION SITE CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMORANDUM TPM 98 -139 DATE: 7/20/99 TO: Director, Engineering Services Department FROM: lClYK15 lelf (-F,e Community Development Department Q �j Fl J � 13 ?A�Op SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval 264-091-16,17.19 (A.P.N.) Wildflower Drive (Address) Oaklev/fakabavashi (Subdivider) Please be advised that the Community Development Department conditions of Approval for Recordation of a Final Map for Case No. TPM 98 -139 as required by Resolution No. DCD 99 -07 have been satisfied. This tentative map expires on 02 -22- 2001. THIS MEMORANDUM MUST BE PROCESSED BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AND TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, 0 Signature BPmemo.doc 07120/99 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. E NGINE FRS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS I Yan R. F.%. P.E. Barry L. Munn, P.E. Cordon 1.. McF,iroy, P.L.S. Laura Simon, Principal Planner CIVIL ENGINEERING Engnamng Swdiea Sin Lkvelnpmeni Analysis Grading Plans Improvemen, Plana Urairuge Plain Scwcr/wamr L,m Plana Rydlneymydraullo Cwuwaim Adm,nuwinn Pavemnn, Rclundaauon F..1.1 Fnglneenng LAND PLANNING Pndcqu,.luon A..I"m Lad J. Con.uluuon Envin.n,rcnnl A,WYsia Govenvrcm Relauom Land Divn,on Tema,ive MAP, Major U. Permiu SP 'fie Plw Rem ing varmnre. Adm:n,.vauve Penrvu A —,dl.m Boundary Ad,.,... LAND SURVEYING Pmpeny Survcys T,rygnpM1,cal Survey. Comlmmiun S..U.S RccoN. of Survey Leeal Dexrigiam Subdivia,on Maps F,xnanla W,,hl Cerurcaliom CaAnual Surveys PM1mngnmmevie Survey. September 27. 1999 Mr. Bill Weedman City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan A%enue Encinitas- Ca 92024 Re: Street Name Approval TPM 98 -139 Dear Mr. Weedman: 1 I 28� ` CITY OF ENCINITAS In order to meet specific condition M6. "Street names shall be approved by the City prior to recordation of the final map" We are opting to retain the existing street names of Wildflower Drive and Wildflower Valley Drive for the reference property We appreciate %our approval confinning that this condition has been satisfied. Thank you! Sincere Chen l Ehlers Director of Project Processing CE /ab (760) 753 -5525 a FAX (760) 943.8236 4407 Manchester Avenue a Suite 105 a Encinitas, California 92024 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Irnpro�ement Projects f District Support services Feld Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM FROM: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) ® Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ District Support Services (D) ❑ Office of the Director (# 1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) T Community Develonment- CuTrent Plannine Fit( W e- O Fite-Fire Prevention ATTENTION: e� San Die¢uito Water District - Engineering & Planning 8 Community Services — Parks & Beaches DATE: Regarding (Finance Number 6062 - A ��)� DEPOSITJIZ (0P TWMUP/MIN/DR: �°/ (Finance Number 60/, ,i - r i•T r DEPOSIT " 0'&& � � Wi /G7 y-� r (Finance Number__- 315 PO /FEE APN: 26,q — D 4/ Transmitted as following: Other Application: Final Parcel Map 0 Final Map ❑ ��' ✓ Check (Type) (Check) Checkprint / Approved Copy / OrliJg/in" al / r Re vi sed �o �edA , rI *�/ Comments/Additional Space for Document: -* N v ,p Rer • ( Staff /Consultant/CD /Fire /SDWD /OMWD/LCWD) Sketch (if needed): 9 Off Improvement Plan S Check Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original / 422w r Revised oa aln a /Water /Se_er/fraiVPark/Facility) Intermediate Description: - �S�Y Grading Plan � � Check Plan Change Description: Checkprint / Approved Copy / Original U r Revised � 06a -C,rz =2 ISM- (Mass/Rough/11 Imm ecise) on lanting & Irrigation) As Per... Our conversation ❑ My /your inquiry ❑ Our Review ❑ Our Inquiry ❑ Our Approval 13 For your... Correction ❑ Comment ® Signature ❑ Information ❑ Uses ❑ Please return k✓�+ 2 weCi4— 5 Please call ;L 7'? 3 if necessary Originator. BVat. rot( Copies to: G 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 920243633 TEL (760) 633- 27701FAX (760) 633 -2818 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 3SG /ARR/Inter Trans. doe/03.02,99 1 of 1 CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 505 So. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 (760) 633 -2710 AMENDED NOTICE OF DECISION DCD 99 -07 February22,1999 Note: This Notice of Decision has been amended to reflect chanties to specific conditions of approval. Condition HW6 has been added pursuant to Section 711.4 of the State Fish and Game Code. This letter is to inform you that the Director of Community Development has approved the application for: 98 -139 TPM/MIN/E1A (Oakley): Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Use Permit and Environmental Initial Assessment to create a four lot subdivision with a remainder parcel for a 11.37 + /- acre property located towards the southerly end of Wildflower Drive and southwest of Wildflower Estates. (Portions of APN 264- 091 - 16,17,19). Project Description and Discussion: The proposed project is the subdivision of an 11.37+/- acre parcel known as the "Oakley property". The project site is located in a semi - rural section of Olivenhain. The site consists of gently sloping topography that has historically been cleared and used for animal grazing and horse - related functions. The project area was part of Boundary Adjustment application involving 7 legal lots (97 -131 BA, Mayo, et al) that was approved by the Community Development Department on July 18, 1997. The tentative parcel map and minor use permit would create lots with the following lot sizes: Parcel Lot Size /Gross Parcel 1 2.72 /acres Parcel 2 2.05 /acres Parcel 3.18 /acres Parcel 4 1.63 /acres Remainder 1.79 /acres Lot Area/Net i 2.70 /acres _ 8 1.95 /acres 2.66 /acres -- 1.36 /acres 1.64 /acres The applicant has designed the project to utilize lot area averaging in order to create lots with usable pads outside the existing constraints, which include sloping topography and crnfa8139TPM.DCD it the Escondido Sewer Outfall easement. The underlying zoning, which is Rural Residential, calls for minimum lot sizes of 2 acres. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 30.16.020 A(1), lot area averaging for subdivisions creating four (4) or fewer lots in a residential zone may be approved pursuant to a minor conditional use permit. This proposed subdivision yields an average lot size of 2.06 acres. The applicant will dedicate and improve a 10' -wide recreational trail easement adjacent to Wildflower Valley Drive that will be consistent with the City's adopted Interim Recreational Trails Standards. An Environmental Initial Assessment and Negative Declaration has been prepared for the City of Encinitas by the environmental consulting firm of Englehom & Associates. According to the Initial Study, the project could not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be prepared. The applicant has submitted service availability letters indicating that all required services are available for the project site. A standard 300 ft. / 100 ft. radius public notification was issued, with minimal comments being received by the community. No letters of concern or objection were received by Planning staff. FINDINGS Tentative Parcel Map: This approval is subject to the following findings for Tentative Parcel Map. 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451 of the Subdivision Map Act since the project is in conformance with the General Plan designation (RR) for the site and no Specific Plan is applicable. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and any specific plans since the project is in conformance with the General Plan designation (RR) for the site. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the intended residential type of development because in terms of lot size, shape, setbacks and access the subdivision will adequately accommodate existing future development of single family dwellings. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development since the subdivision will conform to the density limitations of the RR Zone. crnN98139TPM.DCD 2 5. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project consists of a minor subdivision within an urbanized area. No significant natural resources are present on the site. 6. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, since documentation has been obtained stating that necessary services and utilities shall be available for the site. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. A review of title information did not show any easements on or adjacent to the property, which would be adversely impacted by this application. 8. The subdivision conforms to all the provisions of the Municipal Code including project density, lot size and lot dimensions, as per the information submitted in the subject application. FINDINGS FOR A USE PERMIT STANDARD: In accordance with Section 30.74.070 of the Municipal Code, a use permit application shall be approved unless findings of fact are made, based upon the information presented in the application or during the hearing, which support one or more of the following conclusions: 1. The location, size, design or operating characteristics of the proposed project will be incompatible with or will adversely affect or will be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residences, buildings, structures or natural resources, with consideration given to, but not limited to: a. The inadequacy of public facilities, services and utilities to serve the proposed project; b. The unsuitabilityof the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed, and C. The harmful effect, if any, upon environmental quality and natural resources of the city; Facts: The applicant is proposing a four -lot subdivision with a remainder parcel. As part of this application, the applicant proposes lot area averaging to create lots that are smaller cWk98139TPM.DCD than 2 acres in size. Pursuant to Section 30.16.020 of the Municipal Code, lot area averaging may be proposed and approved through the minor use permit process. Discussion: This proposal will create parcel sizes that range from 1.36 acres /net to 2.98 acres /net. The average lot size will be 2.06 acres which is greater than the 2 -acre minimum lot size for the RR zone. This proposal is compatible with the approved subdivision to the north (Wildflower Estates) which also utilized lot area averaging. Lot sizes in the Wildflower Estates subdivision were approved ranging from 1.5 acres to 2.1 acres. The grading of the parcels proposed for this development will be in substantial conformance with similar estate type lots in the vicinity. Conclusion: The proposed project will be compatible with adjacent large -lot, custom - home developments and subdivisions. Public services will be available for this subdivision. Average lot size will be greater than the two acre minimum lot size required in the RR zone, which is ample area to site a single - family custom home and accessory structures. The pattern of future development will be consistent with adjacent land uses in terms of intensity, grading and density and no harmful effects on the environment or natural resources will occur from this project. 2. The impacts of the proposed project will adversely affect the policies of the Encinitas General Plan or the provisions of the Municipal Code; and 3. The project fails to comply with any other regulations, conditions, or policies imposed by the Municipal Code. Facts:. Pursuant to Chapter 30.16.020 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, a minor residential subdivision is permitted by right in the RR zone while lots designed for residential use may be smaller than that allowed by the underlying zoning with the approval of a minor use permit for lot area averaging. Discussion: The Community Development Department has conducted an analysis of the application and has not identified any significant adverse impacts that could result from the proposed use. A standard public notification was issued, and no negative comments were received by the community. The project has been designed around the policies of the General Plan and development regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance. The slope analysis presented with the application indicates areas of potential grading that are shown on the slope analysis as being in excess of 25% slope. A visual review of the contour lines on the tentative parcel map and a review of the site in the field indicates that the areas shown in excess of 25% are not excessively steep. Also, a slope analysis calculation sheet prepared and certified by the project engineer indicates that the cmIM139TPM.DCD C! encroachment into the over 25% slope area is less than 10% which is consistent with Municipal Code Section 30.34.030B. Conclusion: Based on Community Development Department analysis, the project has been designed not to create any significant environmental impacts nor will the project adversely affect the policies of the Encinitas General Plan or the provisions of the Encinitas Municipal Code. Environmental Review: The City of Encinitas, having consulted with Englehom & Associates, has completed an Initial Study of this project in accordance with the City's CEQA Guidelines for the purpose of determining whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment. That Study has determined that the project could not have a significant effect on the environment, therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. CONDITIONS This approval is subject to the following conditions: SCI SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: SC4 Approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and all associated permits will expire on February 22, 2001, at 5:00 PM, two years after the approval of this project, unless the conditions have been met or an extension of time has been approved pursuant to the Municipal Code. SC5 This project is conditionally approved asset forth on the application dated received by the City on June 3, 1998, and Tentative Parcel Map dated received by the City on December 30, 1998, consisting of I sheet, designated as approved by the Community Development Department on February 22, 1999, and shall not be altered without express authorization by the Community Development Department. SCA 'or to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall cause the property to be annexed to the Cardiff Sanitation District to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. W6 s project has been identified as having a potential impact on fish and/or wildlife; therefore, pursuant to Section 711.4 of the State Fish and Game Code, the applicant must gor�,p submit to the City of Encinitas a negotiable check in the amount of $1,275.00 if this CV project includes a Negative Declaration, or a check in the amount of $875.00 if this P� project includes an Environmental Impact Report. The purpose of the above State cm/v98139TPMDCD established fee is to defray the cost of managing and protecting fish and wildlife resources which may be impacted by the development. The check, made payable to the County Clerk of San Diego County, must be submitted prior to the end of the 4th day following the City's action. Failure to submit a negotiable check will cause the project approval to become null and void since the Notice of Determination can not be filed without payment of this fee or authorized notice of exemption as provided in Section 711.4. NO BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER ENTITLEMENTS WILL BE PROCESSED UNTIL THIS CONDITION IS SATISFIED. G1 STANDARD CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): G5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Municipal Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived herein. G13 The applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, School Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Flood Control Mitigation Fees, Park Mitigation Fees, and Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees. Arrangements to pay these fees shall be C o07 ade prior to Final Map approval/building permit issuance to the satisfaction of the C mmunity Development and Engineering Services Departments. The applicant is advised to contact the Community Development Department regarding Park Mitigation tyt> J Fees, the Engineering Services Department regarding Flood Control and Traffic Fees, AF t1lo applicable School District(s) regarding School Fees, the Fire Department regarding Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees, and the applicable Utility Departments or Districts regarding Water and/or Sewer Fees. Ml This approval may be appealed to the City Council within 10 calendar days from the date of this approval pursuant to Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code. M2 All project grading shall conform with the approved Tentative Map or Tentative Parcel Map. In cases where no grading is proposed at the time of the Tentative Map/Tentative Parcel Map, or in cases where the grading plan later submitted is not consistent with the approved Tentative Map/Tentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall be required to obtain a design review permit for grading prior to issuance of grading permits. M4 The property owner /developer shall obtain design review permits through the City for homes to be constructed on the lots resulting from the approved map, as well as all related crW&98139TPM.DGD C site improvements. If the property owner /developer elects to develop the lots resulting from the approved final map as custom homesites, the design review permit requirement may be waived by the Community Development Department pursuant to Section 23.08.030 (7) of the Municipal Code. The property owner /developeris advised to contact the Community Development Department at such time as development of the subject property is planned to determine whether a design review permit will be required. A standard covenant specifying this condition shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder to give constructive notice to future purchasers of the site. M6 Street names shall be approved by the City prior to the recordation of the final map, and street addresses shall be provided by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits. MT The applicant shall dedicate and improve a 10' -wide recreational trail easement (� commencing at a point approximately 40' easterly of the northwest comer of Parcel 4, then southerly for a distance of approximately 20', then westerly for a distance of approximately 295' to the subdivision boundary. Trail improvements shall meet the City's adopted Interim Recreational Trails Standards. F1 FIRE CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): F2 ACCESS ROADWAY DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roadways shall have an unobstructed paved width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. EXCEPTION: Access to one (1) single family residence shall not be less than 16 feet of paved width. F4 TURNAROUNDS: All dead -end fire access roadways in excess of 150 feet in length and serving more than four (4) dwelling units shall be provided with a cul -de -sac. The cul -de -sac radius for public streets shall comply with city road standards. Streets constructed to private road standards where a turnaround is required shall have a cul -de- sac with a paved radius of not less than 36 feet. Cul -de -sacs in commercial projects shall comply with City road standards. Alternate types of turnarounds may be considered by the Fire Chief as needed to accomplish the purpose of the Fire Code. F5 GRADE: The gradient for a fire apparatus roadway shall not exceed 20.0 %. Grades exceeding 15.0% (incline or decline) shall not be permitted without mitigation. Minimal mitigation shall be the installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems for structures accessed by such a roadway. a1fv98139TPM.DCD rA F7 RESPONSE MAPS: Any development that by virtue of new structures necessitates fire hydrants, roadways, or similar features, shall be required to provide a map in a format compatible with current Department mapping services, and shall be charged a reasonable fee for updating all Fire Department response maps. F8 COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS: Prior to the delivery of combustible materials on the project site, water and sewer systems shall satisfactorily pass all required tests and be connected to the public water and sewer systems. In addition, the first lift of asphalt paving shall be in place to provide a permanent all- weather surface for emergency vehicles. Said access shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. F9 POSTING OF ROADWAYS: Emergency access roadways when required shall be properly identified as per Fire Department standards. 1`10 OBSTRUCTIONS (ACCESS ROADWAYS): All traffic lanes shall be a minimum of 24 feet in width during construction and shall be maintained clear and free of obstructions during construction in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. F11 FIRE HYDRANTS & FIRE FLOWS: The applicant shall provide fire hydrants of a type, number, and location satisfactory to the Encinitas Fire Department. A letter from the water agency serving the area shall be provided that states the required fire flow is available. Fire hydrants shall be of a bronze type. A two -sided blue reflective road marker shall be installed on the road surface to indicate the location of the fire hydrant for approaching fire apparatus. F12 FUEL MODIFICATION ZONES: The applicant shall provide and maintain fire /fuel breaks to the satisfaction of the Encinitas Fire Department. F13 ADDRESS NUMBERS: Address numbers shall be placed in a location that will allow them to be clearly visible from the street fronting the structure. The height of the address numbers shall conform to Fire Department Standards. F14 ADDRESS NUMBERS FOR STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF ROADWAY: Where structures are located off a roadway on long driveways, a monument marker shall be placed at the entrance where the driveway intersects the main roadway. Permanent address numbers with height conforming to Fire Department standards shall be affixed to this marker. F15A AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM - SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES: Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system cmrv98139TPM.DCD L, installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. El ENGINEERING CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): E2 All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of building/grading permit issuance shall apply. EGI Grading Conditions EG2 No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the final map. EG3 The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. EG5 No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. EG6 A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate grading permit issued for the borrow or disposal site if located within the city limits. All newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeperthan 2:1. EG8 A soils /geological/hydraulic report (as applicable) shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Such report shall be submitted and approved Prior to final map approval/Prior to building permit issuance /At first submittal of a grading plan, as applicable. EG9 Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the Engineering Services Director for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the Engineering Services Director may impose with regards to the hauling operation. EG 10 In accordance with Section 23.24.370 (A) of the Municipal Code, no grading permit shall be issued for work occurring between October 1st of any year and April 15th of the cmld98139TPM. DCD 7 following year, unless the plans for such work include details of protective measures, including desilting basins or other temporary drainage or control measures, or both, as may be deemed necessary by the field inspector to protect the adjoining public and private property from damage by erosion, flooding, or the deposition of mud or debris which may originate from the site or result from such grading operations. ED1 DrainaeeConditions ED2 The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and shall construct temporary desiltation/detention basins of type, size and location as approved by the Engineering Services Director. The basins and erosion control measures Y shall be shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the Y satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or approved by the Engineering Services Director. The developer shall maintain the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a period of time satisfactory to the Engineering Services Director and shall guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the Engineering Services Director. ED3 A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water originating within the subdivision, and all surface waters that may flow onto the subdivision from adjacent lands, shall be required. Said drainage system shall include any easements and structures as required by the Engineering Services Director to properly handle the drainage. ED5 The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the final map for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan and City of Encinitas Standards as required by the Engineering Services Director. ED6 The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless covenant regarding ep1 •j,s drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map /any grading or lP .9 buildingpermit for this project. i1 Concentrated flows across driveways and/or sidewalks shall not be permitted. I ED8 The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from a l 00 -year frequency storm under developed conditions is equal to or less than the runoff from a cm/u98139TPM.DCD 10 storm of the same frequency and duration under existing conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results. ES1 Street Conditions ES2 A registered Civil Engineer or a licensed land surveyor shall provide a signed statement that: "The existing private roads of access to the project are within the easements for the benefit of the land division ". ES3 The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the Tentative Map /site development plan. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the Final Map /prior to issuance of any building permit for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. ES4 Reciprocal access and/or maintenance agreements shall be provided ensuring access to all „ntA� parcels over private roads, drives or parking areas and maintenance thereof to the �'j�� satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director. ES6 In accordance with Chapter 23.36 of the Municipal Code, the developer shall execute and 1_� record a covenant with the County Recorder agreeing not to oppose the formation of an t�`� assessment district to fund the installation of right -of -way improvements. ES8 The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the Engineering Services Director prior to approval of the Final Map /issuance of any grading or building permit for this project. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Encinitas Standards based on R -value tests. The standard improvement plan check deposit is required. ES9 Some improvements shown on the Tentative Map and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The subdivider shall conform to Municipal Code Section 24.16.070 regarding offsite improvements and acquisition of property interest. EUl Utilities Cmlv96139TPM.DCD 11 Ak F�U2 The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective utility agencies regarding services to the project. $U3 The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G. & E., Pacific Telephone, and other applicable authorities. EV4 All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including existing utilities unless exempt by the Municipal Code. EU5 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation and undergrounding of existing public utilities, as required. EU7 The design of the division of land shall provide each cable operator an opportunity to construct, install and maintain, on land identified on the map as dedicated to public utility use, any equipment necessary to extend cable television services to each residential parcel in the subdivision. This conditions shall not apply to the conversion of existing dwelling units to condominiums, community apartments, or stock cooperatives. EU8 Subject to all applicable Federal and State laws, statutes and regulations, in the event of multiple cable communication operators desiring to serve new residential developments in which the electric power and telephone utilities are underground, the following procedure shall apply with respect to access to and utilization of underground easements: (a) The developer shall be responsible for contacting and surveying all franchised cable operators to ascertain which operators desire to provide cable television service to the development. The developer may establish a reasonable deadline to receive responses from cable operators. The final tract map shall indicate the cable operator(s) that have agreed to serve the development. (b) If one or more cable operators wish to provide service, they shall be accommodated in the joint utilities trench on a nondiscriminatory shared basis. (c) The developer shall provide at least (10) working days notice of the date that the utility trenches will be open to the cable operators that have agreed to serve the development. (d) Sharing the joint utilities trench shall be subject to compliance with Public Utilities Commission and utility standards. If such compliance is not possible, or if three (3) or more operators desire to provide service to the cm&u98139TPM.DCD 12 Ak development, the developer shall provide a separate trench for the cable television cables, with the entire cost shared among the participating cable operators. With the concurrence of the developer, the affected utilities and the cable television operators, alternative installation procedures, such as the use of deeper trenches, may be utilized, subject to the applicable law. (e) Any cable operator wishing to serve an area where the trenches have been closed shall be responsible for separate trenching and associated costs; provided that if the cable operator was not provided timely written notice of the availability of such trenches, the developer shall reimburse the operator for such costs. EMI Map This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) phase. /// X13 This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No building permit shall be issued for the remainder parcel until it is reviewed and approved pursuant to the provisions of Title 24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. This note shall be placed on the final map. In accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code Chapter 1.12, this decision maybe appealed to the City Council within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this determination. The appeal must be filed, accompanied by a $100.00 filing fee, prior to 4:00 PM on the 10th calendar day following the date of this notice of decision. This notice constitutes a decision of the Community Development Department only. Additional permits, including Building Permits, may be required by the Building Department or other City Departments. It is the property owner or applicant's responsibility to obtain all necessary permits required for the type of project proposed. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact Chris Miller at the Community Development Department by telephoning (760) 633 -2718. 1 �- Sandra Hol er Community Development Director cm4198139rPM.DCD 13 Ah CITY OF ENCINITAS NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Title: Oakley Property; Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Use Permit; Case No.98 -139 TPM /MIN. Location: Terminus of Wildflower Drive; Olivenhain Community, City of Encinitas, California. Description: Tentative Parcel Map and Minor Use Permit subdividing a 11.37 acre site into five 2.06 acre average size parcels with accompanying street improvements; annexation to Cardiff Sanitation District. Project Sponsor: Jesse R. Oakley 2171 Pavillion Drive Santa Ana, California 92705 FINDING: Based upon information provided in the Comments and Responses to the Notice of Declaration which have been presented to Department, City of Encinitas, the Comm finds that the project will not have a environment. MITIGATION MEASURES: Initial Study, along with Preparation of a Negative the Community Development anity Development Director significant effect on the No potentially significant effects have been identified and no mitigation measures are necessary for inclusion in the project as a condition of project approval. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to substantiate the finding. 14' 22 � � � � `1 Date �1 City Planner City of Encinitas 1 o c oO D i goo F City O�INEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Encinitas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering November 6, 2002 Attn: California Federal Bank 24221 Calle De La Louise Laguna Hills, California 92653 RE: Oakley, Takabayashi, Cornucopia, Inc. APN 264- 091 -58 TPM 98 -139 Sewer Permit DCS315 Final release of security Permit DCS315 authorized sewer improvements as shown on approved plan, all as necessary to build described project. Final, acceptance, and warranty inspections have all been completed to the satisfaction of the Field Operations Division. Therefore, release of the security deposit is merited. The following Certificate of Deposit Account has been cancelled by the Financial Services Manager and is hereby released for payment to the depositor. Account # 725- 0141749 in the amount of $49,059.00. The document originals are enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633 -2779 or in writing, attention the Engineering Department. Sin c ely, � asih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering CC: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Cornucopia, Inc. Debra Geishart File hLba4ch Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 760-633-2(M / FAX 760 - 633 -7627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 Too 760633-2700 � MCYC d paper City O�INEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Encinitas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering November 6, 2002 Attn: California Federal Bank 24221 Calle De La Louise Laguna Hills, California 92612 RE: Oakley, Takabayashi, Cornucopia, Inc. APN 264 - 091 -58 TPM 98 -139 Improvement Permit 6062 -I Final release of security Permit 6062 -I authorized improvements as shown on approved plans, all as necessary to build described project. Final, acceptance, and warranty inspections have all been completed to the satisfaction of the Field Operations Division. Therefore, release of the security deposit is merited. The following Certificate of Deposit Account has been cancelled by the Financial Services Manager and is hereby released for payment to the depositor. Account # 725 - 0141707 in the amount of $1000.00. The document originals are enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633 -2779 or in writing, attention the Engineering Department. _ Sinc%rely, Masih Maher , • Senior Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering CC: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Cornucopia, Inc. Debra Geishart File Wy Lembach Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 760-63 3-2600 /FAX 76063 3-2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas, California 92024.3633 TDD 760- 633 -2700 .0W recyded paper Cit�",�INEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Encinitas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering November 6, 2002 Attn: California Federal Bank 24221 Calle De La Louise Laguna Hills, California 92612 RE: Oakley, Takabayashi, Cornucopia, Inc. APN 264- 091 -58 TPM 98 -139 Grading Permit 6062 -GI Final release of security Permit 6062 -GI authorized earthwork, private drainage improvements, and erosion control, all as necessary to build described project. Final, acceptance, and warranty inspections have all been completed to the satisfaction of the Field Operations Division. Therefore, release of the remainder of the security deposit is merited. The following Certificate of Deposit Account has been cancelled by the FSnancial Services Manager and is hereby released for payment to the depositor. Account # 725- 0141764 in the amount of $152,403.00. The document originals are enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633 -2779 or in writing, attention the Engineering Department. 5in� Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering CC: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Cornucopia, Inc. Debra Geishart File Financial Services TEL 760 - 633 -2600 / FAX 760 -633- 2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, Califomia 92024 -3633 Too 760-633 -2700 vI recycfedpaper City O�INEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Encinitas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering November 6, 2002 Attn: California Federal Bank 24221 Calle De La Louise Laguna Hills, California 92612 RE: Oakley, Takabayashi, Cornucopia, Inc. APN 264 - 091 -58 TPM 98 -139 Grading Permit 6075 -GI Final release of security Permit 6075 -GI authorized earthwork, private drainage improvements, and erosion control, all as necessary to build described project. Final, acceptance, and warranty inspections have all been completed to the satisfaction of the Field Operations Division. Therefore, release of the remainder of the security deposit is merited. The following Certificate of Deposit Account has been cancelled by the Financial Services Manager and is hereby released for payment to the depositor. Account # 725- 0141715 in the amount of $34,667.25. The document originals are enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633 -2779 or in writing, attention the Engineering Department. Since ly, Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering CC: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Cornucopia, Inc. Debra Geishart File Financial Services 1TL 760 -633 -2600 / FAX 760- 633.X27 505 5. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024.3633 TDD 760- 633-2700 T fBCyf9Btl paper Cit�",�INEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Encinitas November 6, 2002 Attn: California Federal Bank 24221 Calle De La Louise Laguna Hills, California 92612 Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering RE: Oakley, Takabayashi, Cornucopia, Inc. APN 264- 091 -58 TPM 98 -139 Grading Permit 6075 -GI Final release of security Permit 6075 -GI authorized earthwork, private drainage improvements, and erosion control, all as necessary to build described project. Final, acceptance, and warranty inspections have all been completed to the satisfaction of the Field Operations Division. Therefore, release of the remainder of the security deposit is merited. The following Certificate of Deposit Account has been cancelled by the Financial Services Manager and is hereby released for payment to the depositor. Account # 725- 0141756 in the amount of $104,001.75. The document originals are enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633 -2779 or in writing, attention the Engineering Department. Sincerely, Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering CC: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Cornucopia, Inc. Debra Geishart File Financial Services TEL 760 -633 -2600 / FAX 760 - 633 - 2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas, Califumia 92024 -3633 TDD 760 - 633 -2700 � mcydeid PAW ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City Of Capital Improvement Projects Encinitas District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering November 6, 2002 Attn: California Federal Bank 24221 Calle De La Louise Laguna Hills, California 92612 RE: Jessie R. Oakley APN 264- 091 -68 3065 Wildflower Drive Grading Permit 6809 -GI Final release of security Permit 6809 -GI authorized earthwork, private drainage improvements, and erosion control, all as necessary to build described project. Final, acceptance, and warranty inspections have all been completed to the satisfaction of the Field Operations Division. Therefore, release of the security deposit is merited. The following Certificate of Deposit Account has been cancelled by the Financial Services Manager and is hereby released for payment to the depositor. Account # 725- 0152431 in the amount of $20,004.00. The document originals are enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633 -2779 or in writing, attention the Engineering Department. Sinc ly, aw Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering CC: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Oakley, Jesse Debra Geishart File Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 760-633.2600 / FAX 760 -633 - 2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760-633 -2700 —0% teL}adBdpBpe! ENGAINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City O Encinitas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering November 6, 2002 Attn: California Federal Bank 24221 Calle De La Louise Laguna Hills, California 92612 RE: Oakley, Takabayashi, Cornucopia, Inc. APN 264 - 091 -58 TPM 98 -139 Grading Permit 6062 -GI Final release of security Permit 6062 -GI authorized earthwork, private drainage improvements, and erosion control, all as necessary to build described project. Final, acceptance, and warranty inspections have all been completed to the satisfaction of the Field Operations Division. Therefore, release of the remainder of the security deposit is merited. The following Certificate of Deposit Account has been cancelled by the Financial Services Manager and is hereby released for payment to the depositor. Account # 725- 0141723 in the amount of $50,801.00. The document originals are enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633 -2779 or in writing, attention the Engineering Department. Sincerely, Masih Maher Senior Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering e y Le bach CC: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Cornucopia, Inc. Debra Geishart File Finance Manager Financial Services TEL 760-633 -2600 / FAX 760 -633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760- 633 -2700 ✓ fBCyclBd pepBr Accountholder JESSE R OAKLEY FBO CITY OF ENCINITAS PERMIT# dpe?21 - 6�1 INDIVIDUAL Opening Balance S 20,004.00 Initial Rate 3.893 %Per Annum of Interest Annual Percentage Yield (APY) 3.95 EVIDENCE OFACCOUNT 26 WEEK CLASSIC CD Account Number Date of Issuance 725 - 0152431 08/09/2001 Initial 02/07/2002 Maturity Dare Renewal Term 182 DAYS Frequency of Earnings Distribution ANNIVERSARY MONTHLY 77tis account is held with California Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, Member FDIC. Please refer to the account disclosure for complete terms and conditions. This account is subject to the Bank's rules and applicable laws and regulations for the deposit classification. A copy of the Bank's account disclosure has been furnished to the acccountholder. This account is not transferable except on the books of the Bank. S0882 (09 -2000) California Federal Bank A Federal Savings Bank (Authorized Signal CITY OF SNCINITAS jXop A" PERSONS BY TRS8E PRSBENT01 That I /we 2 Olh!,CLe Principal, are held and finely bound unto the ty of Encinitas, a municipal corporation th CofDie4o,�rt�te of ao iforn�ia, in the sum of ( S in the form o nas- sa �a on deposit with the C ty Finance officer (per receipt and to be held by it until this obligation becomes vo and if any of the conditions herein are breached, to be applied by City of Encinitas to satisfy any damages suffered and pursuant to the provisions recited hereinafter. The condition of the foregoing obligation is 6uch that whereas the above named Principal has Agreed Ito provide r certain aceo ce improvements with for the property known as datsd O/ . Engineering Permit No. _ ' and is required by the City Code to give a security to guarantee the performance and the completion of said improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall wall and truly perform all the work specified in said agreement, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. In addition, this security shall be conditioned upon the Principal's full compliance with all terms and of ing e required Engineering Permit including Y time limit; and further conditioned upon full compliance with all provisions of the ordinances and standards of the city of Encinitas. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the ,,raid Principal has hereunto set his hand; this day of /bp903a cipel - Notaz $e Business Address {�JC F nQ �el�c el eA 9t ) to51 ALL- PURPOSE ACKNOWLEC ENT StateoftaFC�2l1iGl County of QV-AR� On Ptui, , ;,T 0 , GMI before me,t e-eE'A KF�vfJ�XdlIU� pate Name and Title W Oftw ( 'Ana Des. Notary Weft' personally appeared �� • ct=4t�tfa;3, Name(s) of SignMs) ❑ personally known to me - OR - Aproved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person($ whose name0o Waite- subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/Sb Logy executed the same in his /t}esgtteII authorized capacity(%% and that by hislibedtEteir-signatureA on the instrument the person(, or the entity upon behalf of which the personal acted, executed the instrument. TERESA KENNEDY Commission 0 1164374 Notary Public - California f OrangeCo��nry �+Sr My Comm. Expires Dec 6, 2YJ I WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL SignaNre W Noary PuellL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document Description of Attached Document OF ;-�f\(2-i n T0,5 Title or Type of Document: v7c Document Date: c5 l q 1 amt Number of Pages: 1 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ►�) tom' Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's NameaP, V, V- Cb-V LR_.r, � Individual • Corporate Officer Title(s): • Partner - ❑ Limited ❑ General • Attorney -in -Fact • Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Other: Signer Is Representing: Top of thumb here Name: • Indivi al ❑Corpora Officer Title(s): 11 Partner - ❑ mited 01 ❑ Attorney -in -Fact • Trustee • Guardian or Cons a ❑ Other: Signer S02W(R0211- 2000) 199e NATIONALNOTARYASSOCIATION- 8236Remmel Ave., PO. Box7184- Canoga Pan,C 918 7tda here ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City of Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment /Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering August 8, 2001 Jessie R. Oakley 2171 Pavillion Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 Re: "Remainder Parcel of PM 18461" Grading Application 6809GR [Rough Grading/ Erosion Control] (grading for a single family residence } A.P.N. 264- 091 -68 Permit issuance requirements This correspondence shall serve to briefly summarize the Engineering Permit process. Drawing 6809 -G is pending approval by the Director of Engineering Services, which will be valid for three years. In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per this Drawing, you will need to satisfy the following requirements: (1) Obtain all plan approvals. Then, provide 4 blueline copies of the approved Drawing, and 2 copies of the soil report by Southern California Soil and Testing Inc.dated May 20 1999 and update letter titled "PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING REMAINDER PARCEL MAP NO. 98 -139 WILDFLOWER ESTATES OLIVENHAIN, CALIFORNIA APN #264- 091 -68" DATED FEBRUARY 23, 2001. (2) Post a Security Deposit in the amount of $20,004.00 to guarantee performance of earthwork, and erosion control. Up to 80% of the amount may be in the form of a Performance Bond issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Twenty percent of the amount has to be in the form of cash, certificates of deposit, a letter of credit, or an assignment of account, any of which may be used for the full amount. Any financial instrument's format is subject to approval. Complete the Security Obligation Agreement. (3) Pay non - refundable Inspection and Permit Fees, respectively, as follows: (a)GRADING PERMIT... of $ 1,000.00 and (4) Pay a Flood Control Fee at time of building permit or precise grading plan. The rate is $0.21 /SF, and is assessed on the net increase in impervious surface area due to the driveway and other hardscape. An additional assessment will be levied on the room addition during the building permit process. (5) Provide the name, address, telephone number, and state license number and type of the construction contractor. fgrading/gmew /gr6809i.doc 1 7F.I. 76"33 -2600 - FAX 760-633-2627 505 _. Vulcan A%enue. Fnciniia. +, California 9Ze2•i -3633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 t� recycled paper Construction within the public right -of -way is restricted to qualified contractors. Depending on the work to be done, the contractor will need to possess as follows either a valid: (a) Type "A" General Engineering, any work, or (b) Type "C -12" Grading & Paving, any surface improvement, state license, and meet the minimum insurance requirements as stated on the accompanying handout. (6) Sign the Permits. Any authorized representative of the property owner may sign. Permits are valid for no more than one year and may expire earlier due to expirations on letters of credit and /or insurance policies. Once the Engineering Permits are issued, advance notice of 48 hours must be given prior to you or your contractor scheduling the mandatory pre - construction conference. See Grading Note #9. Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division, who can be contacted at (760) 633 -2704. Construction changes, prepared by the Engineer of Work, should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Prior to issuance of any Building Permit, a rough grading approval will be needed from the assigned Engineering Inspector. At a minimum, rough grading is defined as certified pad preparation and soil compaction, and safe access. As- builts of Drawing 6809 -G, prepared by the Engineer of Work and approved by the Engineering Services Department, may be required prior to Final Inspection. A Final Grading Report may be acceptable in -lieu of as- builts at the discretion of the assigned Engineering Inspector. Please note that Building final inspections are separate from any Engineering final inspections and are not necessarily coincidental. Satisfactory completion of final inspection is a prerequisite for release of the remainder of the Security Deposit. This letter is limited in scope. During the Building Permit process, you will need services and be subject to regulation from as follows: the Planning Division, Building Inspection Division, Fire District, San Dieguito Water District, and all of the City, and the Encinitas Union School District, Olivenhain County Water District, San Dieguito Union High School District. Please inquire at their respective counters. Additional engineering requirements will be forthcoming during the Building Permit process, including, but not necessarily limited to, coordination of the building site plan with the grading plan, resolution of any outstanding public improvement issues, and assessment and collection of sanitary sewer, if applicable, and additional flood control fees. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2783, or you may wish to visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center. f'grad ing/gmew /gr6809i.doc2 Sincerely, Duane Thompson Associate Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering cc San Dieguito Engineering, Engineer of Work Todd Baumbach, Engineering Inspector Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Technicians permit/file enc General Construction Permit Security Obligation Agreement Right -of -way Construction Permit Standard Conditions Requirements for Proof of Insurance DS -7 Modified fgrading/grnew /gr6809i.doc3 r STG L r L DEC 18 2090 min PREPARED FOR: Mr. Al F. Mayo 1682 Kettering Street Irvine, California 92714 i"" • }� Southern California Soil and Testing, incorporated Post Office Box 20627 6280 Riverdale Street San Diego, California 92120 r STG SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Street, San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160 -0627 619- 280 -4321, FAX 619- 280 -4717 May 21, 1990 Mr. Al F. Mayo 1682 Kettering Street SCS &T 8921055 Irvine, California 92714 Report No. 3 SUBJECT: Rippability Analysis for Deep Sewer Trench, Rancho de Mayo Subdivision, Encinitas, California. Dear Mr. Mayo: In accordance with your request we have performed three seismic refraction traverses in select areas of the proposed sewer trench. The findings of our survey and the locations of the seismic traverses are presented herewith. If you should have any questions regarding this report, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CAL IA SOIL TESTING, INC. R. High, 'C.E.G. U237 JRH:ma cc: (3) Submitted (3) San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. (1) SCS &T, Escondido R. N0. 1237 CEf7TIFIED ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST 2� 6 -30 -90 (�. �F 7A 8 :.1 IJ_ b p Introduction................................. ..............................1 Findings..................................... ..............................1 General............................. ..............................1 Seismic Traverses No. S -1 through Traverse No. S- 3 ................2 Seismic Traverse No. S- 3R ........... ..............................3 Rippability Characteristic of Granitics ...........................3 Rippable Condition (0 -4,500 Ft. /Sec•) ........................ 3 Marginally Rippable Condition (4,500 Ft./Sec. -5,500 Ft. /Sec..3 Nonrippable Condition (5,500 Ft./Sec. & Greater) .............4 Seismic Traverse Limitations ........ ..............................4 Plate 1 Plot Plan Plates 2 -4 Seismic Traverses Plates 5 -6 Rippability Charts 5 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL &TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Strut. San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160 -0627 619- 280 -4321, FAX 619 - 280-0717 7 1 l 11111111 • 1 M �'. RANCHO DE MAYO SUBDIVISION ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA The intent of the seismic refraction survey was specifically to facilitate the project planning by determining the variation in seismic velocity of the underlying materials and to determine a reasonable approximation of the depth from the surface to the boundaries between rippable, marginally rippable, and nonrippable bedrock. Three seismic traverses were performed by our firm in May 1990. These traverses were positioned along the proposed sewer trench within areas with the deepest, anticipated excavations. The seismograph's depth of investigation is closely related to the length of the seismic traverse. For a particular length of traverse, e.g., 100 feet, using a ratio of 3:1 between length and depth, we conclude that this length of survey line will detect the boundaries between materials of varying density and velocity to depths ranging to approxinately 33 feet. The maximum length of traverse in this survey is 120 feet, which should reach a depth of approximately 40 feet. MTye. GENERAL: The results of our seismic traverses indicate that the materials are marginally rippable to nonrippable to the proposed depths, however, it SCS &T 8921055 May 21, 1990 Page 2 will be very slow and difficult, therefore blasting may be more economical to achieve the proposed cuts. It should be noted that the materials underlying the areas of the three seismic traverses are comprised of very dense sandstones, mudstones and conglomerates of the Lusardi Formation. These materials will generally have the same rippability characteristics of dense, decomposed granitic. The results of the seismic traverses are presented below and on Plate Numbers 2 through 4 and the locations are indicated on Plate Number 1. The apparent velocities were measured at both ends of the seismic traverses, and the seismic traverse performed in the opposite direction is designated as Number R. Apparent velocities Traverse ft /sec. Laments Traverse No. S -1 0' -13' 2,900 Rippable Topsoils and weathered Bedrock 13' -40' 6,000 Marginally Rippable to Nonrippable Bedrock Traverse No. S -1R 0'- 8' 1,750 Rippable Topsoils and weathered Bedrock 8' -40' 5,000 Marginally Rippable Bedrock Traverse No. S -2 0'- 9' 2,700 Rippable Topsoils and Weathered Bedrock 9' -33' 5,400 Marginally Rippable Bedrock 0' -10' 2,500 Rippable Topsoils and Weathered Bedrock 10-33' 6,000 Marginally Rippable to Nonrippable Bedrock Traverse No. S -3 0'- 4' 1,500 Rippable Topsoils 4-15' 3,700 Rippable Bedrock 15' -33' 6,000 Marginally Rippable to Nonrippable Bedrock SCS &T 8921055 May 21, 1990 Page 3 Apparent Velocities Traverse ft /sec. Comments Traverse No. S -3R 0'- 5' 1,200 Rippable Topsoils 5' -17' 3,900 Rippable Bedrock 17' -33' 6,000 Marginally Rippable to Nonrippable Bedrock RIPPABILITY CHARACTERISTIC OF GRANITICS: The following describes the rippability characteristics of granitic rock materials in regards to the velocity of soundwaves through the rock. The rippability characteristics of the Lusardi Formation will be similar to dense decomposed granitic bedrock, however no oversized material is anticipated to be generated from the excavations within the Lusardi Formation. RIPPABLE CONDITION (0 -4,500 FT./SDC.): This velocity range indicates rippable materials similar to decomposed granitics. These materials will break down into slightly silty, well graded sand. Some areas may contain localized hardrock areas and may present utility trench problems. Materials within the velocity range of from 3,500 to 4,000 fps are rippable with difficulty by backhoes and other light trenching equipment. MARGINAL -LY RIPPAM.E OOrDrrICN (4,500 FT ./SEC. -5,500 FT./SE)C.): This range is rippable with effort by a D -9 in only slightly weathered granitics. This velocity range may also include numerous localized hardrock areas with the possibility of extensive areas of materials which are more similar to fractured granitics instead of decomposed granitics. Excavations in the Lusardi Formation is anticipated to be slow and produce material that will partially break down into a coarse, slightly silty to clean sand, but may contain a high percentage of +1/4" material. Materials within this velocity range are beyond the capability of backhoes and lighter trenching equipment. Difficulty of excavation would also be realized by gradalls and other heavy trenching equipment. SCS &T 8921055 May 21, 1990 Page 4 NONRIPPAME CDNDITICH (5,500 FT./bW. & GREATER): This velocity range includes nonrippable material consisting primarily of moderately fractured granitics and highly indurated sediments at lower velocities and only slightly fractured or unfractured rock at higher velocities. In its natural state, it is not desirable for subgrade due to difficulty in utility trench excavation. Blasting in granitics will produce oversize material requiring special disposal consideration, however oversized materials are not anticipated from the excavation of the sandstones of the Lusardi Formation. This upper limit has been based on rippability with a Caterpillar D-9 using a conventional #9 single shank ripper. However, this upper limit of rippability may some times be increased to 7,000 to 8,000 fps material using the D -9 mounted #9 Series D Ripper or other heavy excavation equipment. The rippability index presented above is a modification of charts prepared by the Caterpillar Company and an article in "Road and Streets ", September 1967. Also included as Plate Numbers 5 and 6 are rippability charts from the October 1986 Caterpillar Performance Handbook. It has been our experience that many of the local contractors cannot achieve the rippability levels as indicated in the 1986 handbook. These charts are presented as potential guidelines for planning the proposed project. SET C TRAVERSE LIMITA CM: The results of the seismic survey for this investigation reflect rippability conditions only for the areas of the traverses. However, the conditions of the Lusardi Formation appears to be similar for the remainder of the site which is underlain by the Lusardi Formation and may be assumed to possess similar characteristics. our reporting is presently limited in that refraction seismic surveys do not allow for prediction for a percentage of expectable oversize or hardrock floaters. Subsurface variations in the degree of weathered rock to fractured rock are not accurately predictable. SCS &T 8921055 May 21, 1990 Page 5 The seismic refraction method requires that materials become increasingly dense with depth. In areas where denser, higher velocity materials are underlain by lower velocity materials, the lower velocity materials would not be indicated by our survey. All of the velocities used as upper limits for rippability are subject to fluctuation depending upon such local variations in rock conditions as: a) Fractures, Faults and Planes of weakness of Any Kind b) weathering and Degree of Decomposition c) Brittleness and Crystalline Nature d) Grain Size It should be noted that ripping of higher velocity materials may become totally dependent on the tine available and the economics of the project. Ripping of higher velocity materials can be achieved but it may become economically infeasible. rn. STREET W S -1 S_ LEGEND SEISMIC TRAVERSE LOCATION �5_3 sT�T *Ir - -- PROPERTY LINE 6 i SCALE 1 -200 0 200 400 44�SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 8OIL & TEQTING. INC. JHIEM DATE 5 -18 -00 "06 8821055 PLATE *i CATERPILLAR PERFORMANCE HANDBOOK Edition 17 October 1986 Seismic Velocity .. ... ....w .em n o a A A e 7 R 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 TOPSOIL ��■■■ CLAY IGNEOUS • �■■■ GRANITE B. SHALE SANDS70NE --------- SLTSTONE CLAYSTONE CONGLOMERATE METAMORPHIC ROCKS SCHIST SLATE B>•t� �t� ��t��t�� - - - - -- �ir•�iyiiti� WA iy mMAP ,MAR IINMLB - Wnaa AL U NON- RIPPABLE I/ Z i J D91- Ripper Performance e Multi or Single Shank No. 9 Ripper e Estimated by Seismic Wave Velocities SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA T SOIL & TESTING, INC. MAYO SUBDIVISION BY: JRN DATE: 5 -18 -90 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 6 NORTH COUNTY AUG 0 9 2001 COMPACTION ENGINEERIN( , INC. E GINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS February 23, 2001 Project No. CE -6286 Jesse & Diana Oakley 2171 Pavilion Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Subject: Change of Soils Engineer Proposed Single Family Dwelling Remainder Parcel, Map No. 98 -139 Wildflower Estates Olivenhain, California APN #264 - 091 -68 References: 1.) "Report of Geotechnical Investigation ", Rancho de Mayo Subdivision, Tract 88 -351 RPL, Encinitas, California, prepared by Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. (SCT), dated May 24, 1989 2.) "Update Report", City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -139, Wildflower Drive, Encinitas, California, prepared by Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. (SCT), dated May 20, 1999 3.) "Update Letter ", prepared by North County Compaction Engineering, Inc., dated February 23, 2001 Dear Jesse & Diana Oakley: In response to your request, we respectfully submit the following information regarding the change of Soils Engineer. We, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC., have reviewed the above referenced soils reports. Subsequent to our review, we concur with findings, conclusions, and recommendations and are satisfied witn the reports. We assume all responsibility within our purvi -w as of February 23, 2001. We were contracted to provide soil testing and inspection services, to certify compliance with current standard practices regarding earthwork construction. P.O. BOX 302002 " ESCONDIDO, CA 92030 . (760)480 -1116 FAX (760)741 -6568 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6286 Page 2 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President RKA:paj cc: (3) submitted oF ESS/ON No. 713 �G P Dale Registered Civi E � � � 3 Geotechnical Engineer 000713 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects city 01- District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering April 12, 2000 Jesse R. Oakley 2171 Pavilion Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 Re. Tentative Parcel Map 98 -139 "por SE1 /4 SeC8 T1 3S R3W SBM" {Minor subdivision of 4 SFD -PCU1 REM -PCL @ s -ly end Wildflower Dr} Grading Application 6062GR [Private Road /Drain] Grading Application 6075GR [Rough Grading /Erosion Control] Improvement Application 606218 [Public Trail /Deferred Monumentsl Sewer Construction Application DCS315 [Public Sewer] A.P.N. 264.091-58 Permit issuance requirements This correspondence shall serve to briefly summarize the Engineering Permit process. Drawing 6062 -G, Drawing 6075 -G, and Drawing CS -315 were all approved by the Director of Engineering Services on April 3, 2000, and will remain valid for three years. In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per these Drawings, you will need to satisfy the following requirements: (1) Ensure that the proposed Final Parcel Map is technically correct. (2) Provide 4 blueline prints each of the approved Drawings 6062 -G and 6075 -G, and 5 blueline prints of the approved Drawing CS -315. (3) Post Security Deposits as follows: WGRADING PERMIT 6062GI... in the amount of $203,204.00 to guarantee performance of private road and drainage improvements, and the associated earthwork and erosion control, (b)GRADING PERMIT 6075GI... in the amount of $138,669.00 to guarantee performance of earthwork, storm drainage, and erosion control, all associated with the rough grading, (c)IMPROVEMENT PERMIT 606211... in the amount of $1,000.00 to guarantee performance and payment of labor and materials for deferred land survey monuments, and (d)SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DCS315... in the amount of $65,412.00 to guarantee performance of public sewer improvements Of the amounts required for 3(a) and 3(b), an aggregate amount of $54,476.00 has to be in the form of cash, certificates of deposit, a letter of credit, or an assignment of account, any of which may be used for any full amount. The balance of the amounts in 3(a) and 3(b), and 100% of the amounts in 3(c) and 3(d), may be in the M M /jsg/98- 139.doc 1 TEL 760 - 633 -2600 / FAX 760 -633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760- 633 -2700 0 recycled paper w form of a Performance Bond, and, in the case of 3(c), a Labor and Materials Bond, issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Any financial instrument's format is subject to approval. (4) Pay non - refundable Inspection Fees and an Inspection Deposit, the latter subject to cost recovery, respectively, as follows: (a)GRADING PERMIT 6062GI... of $8.096.00, (b)GRADING PERMIT 6075GI... of $6,160.00, and (c)SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT... of $1,536.00. (5) Pay a Flood Control Fee of $4,514.00. The rate is $0.21 /SF and is assessed on the private road improvements. Additional assessments will be levied during the development of the parcels. (6) Provide the name, address, telephone number, and state license number and type of the construction contractor. Construction of the public sewer improvements is restricted to qualified contractors. The contractor will need to possess as follows either a valid: (a) Type "A" General Engineering, or (b) Type "C -34" Pipeline, state license, and meet the minimum insurance requirements as stated on the accompanying handout. (7) Provide a work schedule. (8) Sign the Permits and the Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreement Consent Statement, the latter of which must be signed by the property owner of record, the others by an authorized representative. Permits are valid for no more than one year and may expire earlier due to expirations on letters of credit and /or insurance policies. Once the Engineering Permits are issued, advance notice of 48 hours must be given prior to you or your contractor scheduling the mandatory pre - construction conference. See Grading Note #8 and Sewer Note #II. Informal phasing of the project may necessitate more than one such conference. Haul Routes and Transportation Permits are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division, who can be contacted at (760) 633 -2704. Pursuant to Fire Department rules and regulations, prior to any combustible materials being placed on -site, the private road shall have received its first lift of asphalt paving. Construction changes, prepared by the Engineer of Work, should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposit. M M /jsg/98- 139.doc2 Prior to issuance of any Building Permit, a rough grading approval will be needed from the assigned Engineering Inspector. At a minimum, rough grading is defined as certified pad preparation and soil compaction, substantial completion of improvements, and safe access. A proportional reduction of up to 75% of the Security Deposit assigned to the Grading Permit may be merited and forthcoming. As- builts of Drawing 6062 -G, Drawing 6075 -G, and Drawing CS -315, prepared by the Engineer of Work and approved by the Engineering Services Department, will be required prior to Final and Acceptance Inspections. Verification by the assigned Engineering Inspector of the setting of monuments deferred since approval of the Final Parcel Map, and certification and proof of payment for labor and materials, all by the Preparer of the Map, will be required prior to Final and Acceptance Inspections. Filing of Corner Records may be required. Submittal, approval, and recordation of a Certificate of Correction will be required if there are any changes in the implementation of Final Map instructions. Satisfactory resolution of all deferred monument issues will merit release of the Security Deposit assigned. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposit assigned to the Grading Permit. Please note that Building Permit final inspections are a separate event apart from any Engineering Permit final inspection and are not necessarily coincidental. Satisfactory conclusion of Acceptance Inspection and formal acceptance by the City Council and Cardiff Sanitation District Board of Directors is a prerequisite to a 75% reduction in the Security Deposit guaranteeing performance of public sewer improvements, and start of the mandatory one -year Warranty Period. The retention shall be held for the duration of the Warranty Period and will be released only after the satisfactory completion of the Warranty Inspection. The Warranty Inspection cannot be scheduled until after the expiration of the Warranty Period. This letter does not change subdivider or successor -in- interest obligations per the proposed Parcel Map. This letter is limited in scope. During the Building Permit process, you will need services and be subject to regulation from as follows: the Current Planning Division, Building Inspection Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, and Cardiff Sanitation District, all of the City of the Encinitas, and the City of Escondido, Olivenhain Municipal Water District, Encinitas Union School District and San Dieguito Union High School District, all separate public agencies. Please inquire at their respective counters. Additional engineering requirements will be forthcoming during the Building Permit process, including, but not necessarily limited to, coordination of the building site plan with the grading plan, resolution of any outstanding public improvement issues, and assessment and collection of sanitary sewer, traffic mitigation, and additional flood control fees. The latter two items are subject to substantial increases in the near future; payments at the current rates will be accepted if a building application has been formally submitted and the increase has not been adopted, all as of the date of payment. M M /jsg/98- 139.doc3 No connection to the new main will be allowed unless the subject property has annexed into the Cardiff Sanitation District, and the appropriate Wastewater Discharge Permit and Plumbing Permit have been issued. Your parcel, A.P.N. 264 -091 -58, was annexed, effective October 27, 1999. Wastewater Discharge Permits are deferred until prior to issuance of a Building Permit. The Plumbing Permit will be within the scope of a Building Permit. Enclosed please find a copy of the Cardiff Sanitation District's policy regarding Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreements. You are hereby notified of the policy. If there should be a substantial delay in the star[ of your project, please request an update of this letter. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2780, or you may wish to visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center. Sincerely, Jeffrey S. Garami Engineering Technician Subdivision Engineering cc San Dlegulto Engineering, Inc., Engineer of Work Greg Shields, senior Civil Engineer Todd Baumbach, Engineering Inspector Greg Caudill, Engineering Technician permit/file enc Requirements for Proof of insurance Security Obligation Agreement !21 Policy re: Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreements MM /jsg/98- 139.doc4 C I T Y OF E N C I V I T A S EN EERING SERVICES DEPARTMEI 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 6062GI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARCEL NO. : 264 -091 -5800 JOB SITE ADDRESS: S -LY END WILDFLOWER DR. APPLICANT NAME OAKLEY (J.R.) /TAKABAYASHI MAILING ADDRESS: 2171 PAVILION DR. CITY: SANTA ANA STATE: CA PLAN NO.: 6062 -G (K.K.IS.M.) PHONE NO.: 949 - 250 -4080 ZIP: 92705- CONTRACTOR : G F WHILLOCK GRADING 6 EXCAVATING LICENSE NO.: 467299 ENGINEER : SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING INC. PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 5/01/00 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 5/01/01 PERMIT ISSUED BY: INSPECTOR: TODD BAUMBACH PERMIT FEES a DEPOSITS PHONE NO.: 760- 599 -6600 LICENSE TYPE: C -12 P[ NE 760- 753 -5525 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 2,900.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 2. INSPECTION FEE 8,096.00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT t 203,204.00 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 &, F=t,pBp cowmwpLPvtig: A.955 A,pp ------ ----- ------ -- -- - --- DESCRIPTION OF WORK -------------------- ----- - - - - -- PRIVATE ROAD /DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WITH EARTHWORK /EROSION CONTROL FOR 98 -139 TPM, MINOR SUBDIVISION OF 4EA SFD- PCL /IEA REM -PCL. DIRT: 2,300CY CUT, 900CY FILL, 230CY SHRINK, 1,170CY EXPORT. DN: 2EA CATCH BASIN /4EA INLET /2EA HEADWALL /718LF PIPE /50CY RIP -RAP. WAY: 21,495SF AC /PCC, 1EA BARRICADE. LETTER DATED APR 12 2000 APPLIES. - - -- INSPECTION ---------- - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. t- 's I--L- , D t L PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3. -S- - -j -coo DATE SIGNED TELEPHONE NUMBER C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S EN( EERING SERVICES DEPARTMEN 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 6075GI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARCEL NO. : 264 -091 -5800 JOB SITE ADDRESS: S -LY END WILDFLOWER DR. APPLICANT NAME OAKLEY (J.R.) /TAKABAYASHI MAILING ADDRESS: 2171 PAVILION DR. CITY: SANAT ANA STATE: CA PLAN NO.: 6075 -G (K.K. /S.M.) PHONE NO.: 949- 250 -4080 ZIP: 92705- CONTRACTOR : G F WHILLOCK GRADING & EXCAVATING LICENSE NO.: 467299 ENGINEER : SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING INC. PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 5 /01 /00 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 5/01/01 PERMIT ISSUED BY INSPECTOR: TODD BAUMBACH ------------------- - - - - -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS PHONE NO.: 760- 599 -6800 LICEN TYPE: C -12 PH O 760- 753 -5525 1. PLAN CHECK FEE 1,500.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 2. INSPECTION FEE 6,160.00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 138,669.00 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 ------------- ------ - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------------------- EARTHWORK /STORM DRAINAGE /EROSION CONTROL TO ROUGH GRADE 4EA SFD -PCL IN 98 -139 TPM, MINOR SUBDIVISION OF 4EA SFD - PCL /lEA REM -PCL. DIRT: 25,300CY CUT, 22,400CY FILL, 2,900CY SHRINKAGE. DRAIN: 730LF SWALE /lEA DOWNDRAIN/ 15CY RIP -RAP. LETTER DATED APR 12 2000 APPLIES. DEVELOPMENT OF REM -PCL ALLOWED ONLY PER CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE. - - -- INSPECTION ----- --- -- -- - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3. S- ( -00 DATE SIGNED TELEPHONE NUMBER 1 C I• Y O F E N C I N T T A ENC :EKING SERVICES DEPARTMEN 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT EWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PARCEL NO. : 264 - 091-5800 JOB SITE ADDRESS: S -LY END WILDFLOWER DR. APPLICANT NAME OAKLEY (J.R.) /TAKABAYASHI MAILING ADDRESS: 2171 PAVILION DR. CITY: SANTA ANA STATE: CA CONTRACTOR : LICENSE NO.: INSURANCE CO] POLICY NO. ENGINEER PERMIT ISSUE CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS CORPORATION 677801 APANY NAME: FIDELITY b GUARANTY DREO454999 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING INC. DATE: 5/01/00 PERMIT :4O.: DCS315 PLAN NO-: CS -315 (K.K. /S.M.) PHONE NO.: 949- 250 -4080 ZIP: 92705- PHONE NO.: 619 -596 -3270 LICENSE TYPE: A INS. CO. POLICY EXP. DATE: 7/01/00 N N : 760- 753 -5525 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 7/01/00 PERMIT ISSUED BY: INSPECTOR: TODD BAUMBACH ----------------- -- -- - - -- PERMIT FEES 6 DEPOSITS ---------------- ------ - - - - -- 1. PERMIT FEE .00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: 1,536.00 2. INSPECTION FEE .00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT 65;412.00 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: 2,000.00 ------ ----------- -- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ----------- ----------- --- - -- - -- PUBLIC SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR 98 -139 TPM, MINOR SUBDIVISION OF 4EA SFD- PCL/lEA REM -PCL, TO INCLUDE 768LF MAIN /3EA MANHOLEi3EA CLEANGUT ;SEA LATERAL. CONNECT TO EXIST MAIN CS -144. WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS) DEFERRED TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. LETTER DATED APR 12 2000 APPLIES. AS- BUILTS 6 1YR WARRANTY REQUIRED. - - -- INSPECTION ------ --- - - ----- DATE -- - - -- -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER ; AGENT 3 OTHER 00 DATE SIGNED TELEPHONE NUMBER C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S EN( EERING SERVICES DEPARTMEN 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 IMPROVEMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 6062II PARCEL NO. : 264 - 091 -5800 PLAN NO.: 6062 -G JOB SITE ADDRESS: S -LY END WILDFLOWER DR. APPLICANT NAME OAKLEY (J.R.) /TAKABAYASHI (K.K. /S.M.) MAILING ADDRESS: 2171 PAVILION DR. PHONE NO.: 949 -250 -4080 CITY: SANTA ANA STATE: CA ZIP: 92705 - CONTRACTOR : G F WHILLOCK GRADING & EXCAVATING PHONE NO.: 760 -599 -6800 LICENSE NO.: 467299 LICENSE TYPE: C -12 INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: POLICY NO. : POLICY EXP. DATE: 0 /00 /00 ENGINEER : SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING INC. Dwa N 760- 753 -5525 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 5/01/00 ff PERMIT EXP. DATE: 5/01/01 PERMIT ISSUED BY: INSPECTOR: TODD BAUMBACH PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS 1. PLAN CHECK FEE .00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 2. INSPECTION FEE .00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT .00 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 (P, meNpwcoar tspobrr.. 1I060•00 ------ ------------- - - - --- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ---- ----------------- ---- - - - - -- PUBLIC TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS FOR 98 -139 TPM, MINOR SUBDIVISION OF 4EA SFD- PCL/lEA REM -PCL. LETTER DATED APR 12 2000 APPLIES. - - -- INSPECTION ---------- - - - --- DATE -- -- - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION AS- BUILTS AND ONE YEAR WARRANTY RETENTION REQUIRED. I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. i CZ �--. OJk -\4-L - PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3 OTHER -j -DO DATE SIGNED TELEPHONE NUMBER L1 FINAL SUBDIVISON CHECKLIST Map: ANA °1$ -139 Developer: Y Location: Dom` f& Item By Public Works Conditions of Approval Other Department Sign -offs Community Development Community Services Fire V. Building Sewer District Water District K •CaA14G California Coastal Permit or waiver I.AJ60 as Subdivision Map Certified Improvement Plan Signed Grading Plan Signed Approved Cost Estimate (ACE) Improvement Covenant Executed Grading Covenant Executed Securities Posted ACE Amount: $ Type: Amount: $ Type: Amount: $ Type: Processing Deposits Up to Date Subdivision Guarantee Tax Certificate Original Map Mylars (signed with permanent ink) Agenda Report to CAB /Planning Commission After approval by CAB or Planning Commission: Approval by CAB or PC Mylars Signed and Released after 15 day Appeal Period m11039 Date Complete io ;r1D`i ru�L 2 I v 00 SECURITY CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMORANDUM TPM 98 -139 DATE: 7/20/99 TO: Director, Engineering Services Department FROM: bAJII) fwQ?k� Encinitas Fire Department SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval 264 -091- 16,17.19 (A.P.N.) Wildflower Drive (Address) Oakley/Takabayashi (Subdivider) Please be advised that the Encinitas Fire Department conditions of Approval for Recordation of a Final Map for Case No. TPM 98 -139 as required by Resolution No. DCD 99 -07 have been satisfied. This tentative map expires on 02 -22 -2001. THIS MEMORANDUM MUST BE PROCESSED BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AND RETURNED TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. Signature Date BPmemo.doc 07/20/99 0 `.CTI'i Y OF ESCOIv�DO ;� FEB 10 200 artrrctofpubl, Work; _.. 20! 201 N Division ordi �Btoadway - _____ -- LZondido,CA92025 -219 8 839-4664 C' 0AC HNSN*T PEF-= EMC gy 23 -9FF S' ircn; 'putszostnall'e.jra4cted rM.tppR?A \T N0210E Section aZ'. 614217 of the Gov tmml Code rT pnm a DioAlar ldc-atfivaon mm2bv be xma d before a ?cT :it to c%eavaai will be vaiid. For yow DigA:cc aumbc. cslf Undvgre.md Svr- a" Ales ' iCLL Fes. 1- 100422 -4133. two wotkin¢ drys bdarc you d4 APPLSC AffrS MOMMA-11ON P' -ILNI T NO.: (7 -moo DAM, 02 r/ Oo SiC Addtesr. PetnaiL MccoLvc Daly' on END OF '.7ILDFLOWER DRIVE PemsitE;.pirationD d/ o 1�' I Ins. Fxaa -s: D/ O 7�rJPre NO.. ASA gned To: TMP 98 -139 OwLa: JESSE R. OAKLEY II The Ioilo,,—g approved doarr-�s arc a p p`-' 31T of 313 wit: Man No-: Sperncoaa 1 Os°ersAer- 2171 PAVILLION DRIVE SANTA ANA, CA. 92705 Other Ownes Tc47hore No_ 949 - 250 -4080 Special conditions offs per== Pcr At7achcd Cknersl Provisiam ¢sc Ccrsscar: j . CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS I AddM= 2321 OAK KNOLL ROAD NOWAY, CA. 92064 j 2- P!1one':a..' I Fier3m y TelC:vlle No.: I Work or Acts ?-===d 619-670- - 619-596-3270 Q p�� Corrac aYs Scsr Lx=c *lo.: A677801 / &� Tip? y CYry ofEscv=ido2wiaG.:L!caseNo.: 143456 R � r�ox O LS l�7 15 � .1� FF$,� D � { Srrbccnc =-ter. � I Tckacocc No.: I Elaagc:�� Tclghoac \a.: i ! Fee I /6 RC O.: I d,a0 `�_ t' N33+4§ -o I Sub Cozzz ems Coa.-acwr's Stare Liceasc No.: Surface to be cue G Pczidcy :i Strr_. a Local Collector or F:ighcr I Cassiticatirm I Sub COCLraear City of Escondido I3r 'i Lxzz a No.: I Soar:: of W 3r-- i; Si�;S ar 2araead= -. - ! I i Cca-a1 Lhbiliry lrauraacc s a Icquuca t of this p_=i: Sr. Dctour Tmdo Staging O1„c: sector l3 : of is Geceal 'ovisi=s far specinc i= oasaca. { C Ree a°? r' Not 2x%ired . �n , •.: , nu r-cvar^m=t � m be nocred at !east 24 hour, E- r :o ' Work Comalad: I tLe beg==& of work I Date: Sigaara: 1 he= y ac�-odlcd ;e that i have :cad this remit =d .=:z 'tL- -. -L.- T;au tar:. dhra 2 m^:::/ valida=d by a stg_anec, :s a ;c=-j[ m do rice -�artm i ]x c pr� vied s car_ -a ad awe :o :.=!y -vl:h the work or acs :e;cnbed. i .w Or'- ;,sc3. Gy S-4-d Sce- dinaons art •= e;mwts:o= j AZd :oz;acom aI'1i ocrrm'. rack men--Jry of x -urr 0: COT Ar•�Oi'S^'� ACC I or ona:a +-�•-nn r -- A Iran R. Faa. P.E. Barry L. Munson. P.E. Gordon L. McElroy. P.L.S. Laurie Simon, Principal Planner CIVIL ENLNEERING Enpmccnnp Swan, Sne IM11W,m[n1 Analpi, G,Wm, Plana Impm,emcnl Plane UrunaFc Ylans See,rt/SS'aer 1 me Y6n+ Nyamtmynlym.mN, Cam.,. AemmNplmn Yntnrn, NcaaniL,auon Fwrnsic Fn, trm, LAND PLANNING Prcdryms�ew A�alyua Iona U. Cansullumn Ennnnmrnul Mulpn Gommmrm Rdumm larM DALuOn Tenmwc Mqs Mapr Usc Pa,nn, SYeclfir Piam RL,,—, �Y�atir, Aammuuamr IYmnls Am�caanuns HounaanAaw,mmnl, LAND SVNFYING Pmreny S.", l,rpormnh�ol Suncy+ Cnmlrmu,.n Salem, RttoNa a Sun'p' 1 <Fal LHxnpeun• SuNn.awn 10 P F.axnxm+ Nnpm Cemr¢aunna Crfnval Sun<yv Plxanpnmmcua Sw,cys SAN DIEGUITD ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS PLANNERS S R V E YOR5 November 12, 1999 City of Escondido 201 N. Broadway Escondido, CA 92025 Attn: Homi Namdari Re: County of San Diego, TPM 98 -139 Dear Mr. Nomdari: � I 1 2000 EN GrtJI. %RI "JG ri ;VICES CITY Or GMnNITAS In compliance with the County of San Diego's Specific Condition, the proposed map is submitted for your review. We previously sent this request to you on September 22, 1999 and have had no response as of this date. We are required to provide the County of San Diego with a certification from each public entity stating the following. 1. That you have received a copy of the proposed TPM 2. That you do not object to the filing of the map without your signature. In addition, I have enclosed a copy of the preliminary title report referencing your easement. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely Cheryl Ehlers Director of Map Processing CE SDE 445 FILE COPY Acknowledgment of Receipt Required: (Hand Delivery) Received by: Date: ;I (760) 753 -5525 a FAX (760) 943 -8236 4407 Manchester Avenue a Suite 105 • Encinitas. California 92024 a. JEWrM BUNEERIIIG, INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS SURVEYORS CHERYL EHLERS Dirertur o/Prnjer, Proreming (760) 753 -5525 • EAR (760) 943 -0236 f maJ .vhlersO+demc rum 44117 Mancheaer Avenuc • Suue 105 D,ou m, Cold d nrmu 42124 November 5. 1999 San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. Satisfaction of Off Map Conditions To Date TPM 98 -139 Final Man Title Report Updated Report dated 9/21/99 Interoffice Memorandum OMWD, dated 10/12/99 Condition EU8.a Daniels Cablevision, Itr dated 10/18/99 Condition SCA City of Encinitas, Itr dated Oct. B, 1999 Private Road Maintenance Agreement Dated 10/21/99 w/ fees Covenants Real Property: Improvements w/ recording fees Real Property Future Park, Traffic, And Flood Control Fees, w/ recording fees Non - Objections Right of Way Condition SCA- Annexation 1 Real Property: Private Improvements, w/ recording fees Real Property Waiver or Protest w/ recording fees Real Property: Hold City Harmless For Grading /Drainage w/ recording fees SDGE (Sempra Energy) falZelA City of Enc., Itr dated 10/19/99 r' November 5, 1999 San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. Satisfaction of Off Map Conditions To Date TPM 98 -139 Final Map Condition F11 - Fire Flow Utility Agreements ►. OMWD Itr dated 1017/99 County of San Diego Agreement Itr. dated 11/2/99 County of San Diego Department of Public Works 5555 Overland Avenue NI. S. 0336 San Diego, CA 92123 RE: Tentative Map Number: TPM 98 -139 Or Tentative Parcel Map Number: Gendcntcn: of 5 I99y FNGHt CIS Pursuant to Sec. 81.403 a (6) of the San Diego County Code mid TM Resolution No.TPM 98 -139 1 have made arrangements with the utility companies to install all new utility facilities underground. (Also use M� of the following 4 paragraphs which applies to your project.) 1. There arc no exisung overhead utiliries facilities witbin this subdivision. 2. 1 have also made arrangements with the utility companies to relocate existing facilities to an underground position before final acceptance of the subdivision by the County and release of subdivision bond_ 3. The undergrounding of the following existing facilities has been waived by (PERB), (Planning Commission). Or (Board of Supervisors), at the heating. (Date) 4. The Planning Commission waived the requirement to install cable te)evision lines on (-Attach copy of the P.O. (Date) action). 1 have contacted Rotanda Hayward 619- 654 -1256 of San Diego Gas and (Name one o. Electric Company, Phil Stoddard - 619 -574 -4314 of Pacific Telephone (Name and Phone No.) Company, and (when applicable) Russ Carr, Daniels Cablevisiou 760- 931 -7000 (Name and Phone No. Of the appropriate T.V. Cable Company, Very Truly Yours. Subdivider Title I1-a9 t Date c. lda \xwdud tortmtltility Man ammt city of Encinitas October 29, 1999 Mr. Jesse R. Oakley 2171 Pavillion Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 RE: Completion of Annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District for Assessor's Parcel Nos. 264 - 091 -58 (Jesse Oakley Annexation) Dear Mr. Oakley: On October 27, 1999, your application for annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District was approved by the District's Board of Directors. Attached is the resolution of authorization for your records. . The Cardiff Sanitation District appreciates your cooperation and patience throughout the annexation process. To secure a wastewater discharge permit, please meet with one of our Engineering Technicians at the Engineering Counter. If you have any questions about this annexation or if I can provide future assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 633 -2772. Sincerely, Jennifer H. Smith Management Analyst Engineering Services Department 1 Enclosure cc: Laurie Simon San Dieguito Engineering 4407 Manchester Ave., Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 J TEL 760.633 -2600 1 FAX 760 - 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas, California 72024 -3633 Too 760 - 633 -2700 1� recycled paper RESOLUTION NO. 99 -25 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT ANNEXING TERRITORY TO WHICH OWNERS HAVE CONSENTED "JESSE OAKLEY ANNEXATION" WHEREAS, pursuant to the Cortese -Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Govt. Code, Section 5600 et seq.) preliminary proceedings were commenced by resolution of application by this Board on April 28, 1999, as Resolution No. 99 -10, for annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District (thereafter referred to as the District) of certain territory therein described, which description has been modified pursuant to the directions of the Local Agency Formation Commission; and WHEREAS, the annexation proposed by said resolution of application was presented to and approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Diego County on September 22, 1999 and this District was designated as the conducting District and authorized by resolution of order said annexation without notice or hearing and without an election pursuant to Government Code, Section 56837; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, ORDERED AND DETERMINED, pursuant to Government Code Section 57025 et seq.; a. The manner in which and by whom preliminary proceedings were commenced was by resolution of application by this Board as stated above. b. The territory to be annexed has been designated DA 99 -26 by the Local Agency Formation Commission, and the exterior boundaries of such territory are as hereinafter described. C. The territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited and will be benefited by such annexation as described in Health and Safety Code Section 4830. The reasons for the proposed annexation as set forth in the resolution of application referred to above are: 1. The District is empowered to and is engaged in furnishing sewage disposal facilities. 2. The territory proposed to be annexed to said District is developed and/or proposed to be developed and used for residential and/or commercial purposes and provision for sewage disposal facilities for said territory is essential for such purposes. C. The terms and conditions of the proposed annexation are: Payment of State Board of Equalization fees. All the owners of land within such territory have given their written consent to such annexation, as provided in Government Code, Section 56837; and therefore, as approved and authorized by the Local Agency Formation Commission, this Board may adopt its resolution ordering the annexation without notice and hearing and without an election, as provided in Government Code, Section 57002. g. The regular County assessment role will be utilized and the affected territory will not be taxed for existing bonded indebtedness. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that pursuant to Government Code Section 57002, the following described incorporated territory in the City of Encinitas, State of California, be and it hereby is annexed to and made a part of the Cardiff Sanitation District. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Board immediately transmit a certified copy of this resolution along with a remittance to cover the fees required by the Government Code Section 54902.5 to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Diego County, so that the Executive Officer may make the filings required by Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 57200), Part 5, Division 1, Title 6 of the Government Code and by Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 54900), Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27' day of October, 1999 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Bond, Cameron, DuVivier, Guerin, Holz NAYS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Christy Gueri hair of the Board Cardiff Sanitatt n District ATTEST: 1, Dabomh Cemne� cWj � 01 dr City a Endres, Deborah Cervone, Clerk of the Board ca lomia do hereb/ woy too' p0np°r"P""r" the above and ,o OOM Is e true end fed copy of NS doament on Poe in my aftkl . in rrihross wtvwf, I rare set my bend and"sat of tlr CAy of Etxintal AyC DebmhCervab, CNfft ksempra Energy City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 So. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Blair Knoll October 28, 1999 RE: CITY OF ENCINITAS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9 8-139 Please be advised that the division of the property shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 98 -139 will not unreasonable interfere with the free and complete exercise of any easement(s), held by San Diego Gas & Electric Company within the boundaries of said map. This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the Company's rights, title and of the provisions contained in said easement(s), or a waiver of costs for relocation of any interest in and to said easement(s), nor should this letter be construed as a waiver of any affected facilities. In the event that the development requires relocation of facilities, on the subject property, which facilities exist by right of easement or otherwise, the owner the owner /developer will be requested to bear the costs of such relocation and provide SDG &E with suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replacement rights are required prior to the performance of the relocation. If additional information is required in connection with the above mentioned subject, please call Rolanda Hayward at (858) 654 -1256, I am employed by Sempra Energy as a duly authorized agent for San Diego Gas & Electric. Respectfuly� Rolanda F. Hayw Administrative Associate Duly Authorized Agent for SDG &E Land Management Cc: San Dieguito Engineering Sempra Energy City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 So. Vulcan Avenue San Diego, CA 92024 Attn: Blair Knoll Right of Way Arrangements for Tentative Parcel Map 9 8-139 The map referred to in the above Tentative Parcel Map has been reviewed and arrangements for right -of —way have been made by the developer. For additional information, please contact me at (619) 654 -1256. Respectfully, Rolanda F. Ha d Administrative Associate Duly Authorized Agent For SDG &E Land Management Right of Way / Liaimn 4220 Arizona Street, Room 100 San Diego. California 92104 October 28, 1999 City of Encinitas Attn: Tamara 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Gentlemen: RE: TPM 98- 139 - Oakley: Subdivision Map Act Section 66436 PACIFIC ©BELL. A Pacific Telesis Company We have received from the developer a copy of the proposed final map. We do not object to the filing of the map without the signature of Pacific Bell. Yours truly, (?V Phil Stoddart Right of Way Agent Sent by: DANIELS CABLEVISION 760 438 8461; 10/18/99 3:12PM;Je[Fax #207;Page 212 It . . Daniels Cableylsion Inc. P.O. Box 344 Carlsbad. CA 92018.0344 VM��Ii.7C�✓: ■ Ms. Cheryl Ehlers San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. 4407 Manchester Ave., Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 October 18, 1999 Dear Ms. Ehlers, This letter is pursuant to your request regarding the availability of cable service to the projects off Wildflower Drive in Encinitas. Daniels Cablevision does have cable plant in close proximity to the area. Therefore, Daniels would be able to serve the residents in those projects. Please let me know who the Wildflower builders are, so that I may draft a cable service contract. Thank you for your cooperation. ss Carr New Development Business Office (760) 438 -7741 . Customer Service (760) 931 -7000 . Fax (760) 438.8461 5720 El Camino Real . Carlsbad, California 92008 -7298 MEMORANDUM TPM 98 -139 DATE: 7/20/99 TO: Director, Engineering Services Department FROM: Catty) 11 -�Pr-k wrAetl J glLF{urCµn��T Community Services Department SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval 264 - 091 - 16,17,19 (A. P. N.) Wildflower Drive (Address) Oaklev/Takabayashi (Subdivider) Please be advised that the Community Services Department conditions of Approval for Recordation of a Final Map for Case No. TPM 98 -139 as required by Resolution No. DCD 99 -07 have been satisfied. This tentative map expires on 02 -22 -2001. THIS MEMORANDUM MUST BE PROCESSED BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AND RETURNED TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. Signature Date BPmemo.doc 07/20/99 0 a CITY OF ENCINITAS MEMORANDUM TPM 98 -139 DATE: 7 TO: Director, Engineering Services Department FROM: 4EU,t<V 6?A-6 c Olivenhain Municipal Water District SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval 264 - 091 - 16.17,19 (A. P. N.) Wildflower Drive (Address) Oakley/Takabayashi (Subdivider) Please be advised that the Olivenhain Municipal Water District conditions of Approval for Recordation of a Final Map for Case No. TPM 98 -139 as required by Resolution No. DCD 99 -07 have been satisfied. This tentative map expires on 02 -22 -2001. TH!S MEMORANDUM MUST BE PROCESSED BY THE SUBDIVIDER, AND RETURNED TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. Signature BPmemo.doc Date \,_. d Q\ 5 a City Of Encinitas October 8, 1999 Jesse R. Oakley 2171 Pavillion Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 RE: Annexation of 11.38 acres to the Cardiff Sanitation District (APN: 264 - 091 -58) Dear Mr. Oakley: Your application for annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District was recently reviewed and approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission. Your request for annexation will now be placed on the October 27 Cardiff Sanitation District Board Meeting agenda for final adoption At this time, the final payment to the State Board ojEqualization is due in the amount of $800.00. Please forward the payment to me at: Engineering Services Department City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Contingent upon receipt of final fees and Board approval, you will be able to secure your wastewater discharge permits. I will notify you of the Board's decision, by mail, immediately following the October 27 meeting. In the meantime, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 633 -2772. Sincerely, 7ennifer H. Smith j Management Analyst Engineering Services 1� PLEASE MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO "STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION." Cc: Laurie Simon San Dieguito Engineering 4407 Manchester Ave., Auite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 TEL 760- 633 -2600 1 FAX 760- 633.2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 - 633 -2700 � recycled paper OLEIVHAI N � Municipal Water District 1966 Olivenhain Road • Encinitas, CA 92024 • Phone(760)753 -6466 • Fax(760)753 -1578 October 7, 1999 Ms. Cheryl Ehlers San Dieguito Engineering 4407 Manchester Avenue Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Subject: County of San Diego TM 98 -139 Dear Ms. Ehlers: Pursuant to your request, we are providing this letter to satisfy requirements of the Encinitas Fire Department on the above project. In referencing the hydraulic analysis done in April 1989, which included this project area, the required fire flow is available for Tentative Map 98 -139, at a demand of 1500 GPM/ 20 PSI residual. Should you require further information, please contact me. Sincerely, Olivenhain Municipal Water District --J " . M. Kelley �G'-a Engineering A ministrator Board of Directors Arm L Peau President Harold L Gano. lice President Hariev L Denk. Secretary 1heGr=a Al. Aliller, Treasurer Susan J. Pam. Dirnrtor General Manager David C. McCollonr Legal Counsel Pelt;er d• Oliva 519991 00U ll ENG1Kf Eir' q'!r f!� AC�- A public agency proudlv serving portions of Leucadia, Cardiff, Solana Beach, Rancho Santa Fe, Encinitas, Carlsbad, San Diego and the Olivenhain Vallev. SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS PE AN N F RS SURVEYORS Iran R.. Foe. P.E. Baery L. Munson. P.E. Gordon L. McElroy, P.L.S. Laurie Simon, Principal Planner CIVIL ENGINEERINr. Enpneenng AwLc. So, 0<velWP mAnalvsls Grtl,n f ?lam Imrrwvnmrn, M. ", 1999 Dr.m.gc Pl.n3 September 22, SewaM'amr Lire Plms IlvambgyrllvJ --"c, City of Escondido. 201 N. Broadway Escondido, CA 92025 LAND PUNNING PR.Aca.nn,°nM.l>,n RE: County of San Diego TPM 98 -139 Hal Um [°muL.wrn A..Nol Gentlemen, Cinremn.m RAauen, hw Un»i,.n In compliance with the County of San Diego's Specific Condition the propose map r <",,,,•< ,,,P, xl.,nr 0 <INmnl. is submitted for your review. sav,r rmM We are required to provide the County of San Diego with a certification from each vu3. e, Aann v, •.Prm,„ public utility stating; Am,c<vmm n.w�an Aalnnn.nn 1. That you have received a copy of the proposed TPM 2. That you do no object to the filing of the map without your signature LAND SURVEYING rn S.tS` <' I have enclosed a copy of the preliminary title report referencing your easements Lryngmc I nnry. inn „n4.".' ,,,,n S ,,,,ng If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Re<nNuA Survev S.W...... klam SirS�e ely, SnM1Jn,•.,n Mal» �/ ",hl c.n,r "ao•.n, C, ,o.lsn,,,„ Cheryl Eh rs �a °P mm3naSnrver, Director of Project Processing CE SIDE. 4460 (760) 7535525 • rxx (760) 943.8236 4407 Manchester Avenue • Suite 105 • Encinitas. California 921124 ksempra Energy 4Th 1.307 Sa^ D�sov. c. vzro�9on City of fnci= 505 So. VWcw Avenue ramatu, CA 92024 19% ( J ATTN: Blair KDA ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS June 7, 1999 RE: CITY OF ENCUMAS TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 98103 Picric be advlaed that the division of the property shown on TcuMvc Tract Map No. 9 8-103 WM not unreasowuy mwfere with the free and complete = of any easemmt(s), bdd by San Diego Gas & Eketne Company withm the bouadum of said ttsJ=ve parcel map_ Tbu ktter should not be ociumued as a subordbizahm of the C'=qxasrf s rights, title and of the provisions =u=d in said casemmt(s), or a waives of costs for relocation of may i tmwt in and to said asaneot(s), a" sbmW this letter be coasauod as a waiver of any aBeacd &mfAm. In the event that the &wWpmat tegrmea relocation of faWOOS, oa the subject property, which f,c,, m Oda by riglst of ==mug or otherwise, the owme&wclopa will be raquakd to bar the east of sueb rdocatim and prvvxk SDG&E with smW* repixmncd ngbts. Sucb oom ffi replacement rights arc lcquhW prior to the paformance of the relocation. If addC=W mformatian is inquired in mmecuou wiah the above =W=W subject, pkase call Rolanda Hayward at (6l9) 654- 1256, I am employed by Sanpra EmTSy working as a duly =bon=d %sae for San Dow Cress & Ekc - cc: San Diepw Enpn=u*, Inc. TnTRL °.0-2 FROM PACIFIC BELL R/W flight of Way / Lwsuo 4220 Atiteea Seeet. Room I W San Diego, California 52104 May 21, 1999 County of San Diego Map Processing (MS 0336) 5201 Ruffin Road, Suite B San Diego, CA 92123 Gentlemen: (TOE) 6. 1'99 10: 57/BT. 10: 56/AO. 4862136134 P 2 RE: TPM 98- 103- Oaklcy: Subdivision Map Act Section 66436 PACIFIC ®BELL. A Pacific Telesis Company s .lU! - 819A9 We have received from the developer a copy of the proposed final map. We do not object to the filing of the map without the signature of Pacific Bell. Yours truly, r 4J �"""' � Phil Stoddart Right of Way Agent OLIVE N Municipal Water District 1966 Olivenhain Road • Encinitas, CA 92024 • Phone (760) 753 -6466 • Fax (760) 753 -5640 City of Encinitas - Community Development Department 505 S. Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA, 92024 -3633 5 UL - 8 1995 Re: Tax Assessor's Parcel Nr. 264- 091 - 16/17/19 Subject: Water Availability Letter Supplement to County Form 399W L.J i The fee owner, Jesse Oakley (Applicant), has requested the District to provide a Water Avail- ability Letter for the property identified above for a proposed project Applicant described as: Minor subdivision of four (4) Dwelling Unit(s). This property is in the District and eligible to receive domestic service at this time. The District has or will have adequate facilities in this area. There is or will be capacity in these facilities to serve the proposed project at the time requested. Water service is or will be available at the time requested at a minimum of 25 psi pressure at the District's main under normal oper- ating conditions and upon completion of all necessary facilities, including any required onsite and offsite water lines, appurtenances, or facilities as required and noted below, in the District's sole discretion. However, all water received by the District is imported from other agencies. Ac- cordingly, there is no guarantee that water will be available when service is requested. The District has been requested to furnish a staff estimate, based on current conditions, of the availability of water service in this area. This letter is issued for planning purposes and is not a representation, express or implied, that the District will provide service at a future date. Com- mitments to provide water service are made only by the District's Board of Directors and are subject to the applicants compliance with the Districts' fees, charges, rules and regulations, the Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the applicants' agreement to construct any required onsite and off site facilities together with the applicant's providing security as required by the District for construction of those facilities. The issuance of this Water Availability Letter does not grant the applicant any water rights. The applicant does not secure a right to water until application for service is made and approved by the District, and the applicant has complied with all requirements of the District. The failure of the applicant to pay any fee or charge of the District's when due, or to comply with other re- quirements of the District, shall entitle the District to unilaterally terminate this Water Availabil- ity Letter, and all further rights of the applicant to water service. Board of Directors .Arm L Peay, President Harald L Gano, Vice President Harley L Denk, Secretary Thelirm M. Miller, Treasurer Susan J. Vamt Director General Manager David C McCollom Legal Counsel Peh&r & Oliva A public agenn, proudly serving portions of Leucadia, Cardiff, Solana Beach, Rancho Santa Fe, Encinitas, Carlsbad, San Diego and the Olioenhain Valley. Water Availability Letter Project Wildflower II Oaklev Improvement fees, when applicable, are paid to the District to reserve future water service for the project contingent upon the applicant paying all fees and charges and complying with all re- quirements of the District. The payment of all improvement fees by the date they are due is an express condition precedent to any right of the applicant to receive future water service. The fail- ure of applicant to make any improvement fee payment by the date it is due shall automatically terminate the right of applicant to receive future water service and no previous improvement fee payments paid by the applicant shall be refunded. Reinstatement of the water commitment re- quires applicant to remedy any defects or deficiencies and payment of fees and charges applica- ble, as determined by the District, in its sole discretion. This commitment to water service availability is conditioned on the following requirements and /or limitations: 1. Payment of all improvements fees, as appropriate, when due in accordance with District Ordinance 246, or successor Ordinance, not attached hereto, but incorporated herein by reference. 2. Applicant is required to have a hydraulic analysis done by the District's consulting engineer to ascertain the impact of the project on the District's water system. 3. Applicant is required to provide all fee and easements as required for construction of onsite and offsite facilities as required by the District, in its sole discretion. 4. Applicant is required to construct all onsite and offsite facilities as required by the District, in its sole discretion. 5. Applicant is required to execute District Agreement for pipeline construction and furnish all necessary documents for insurance, bonding, and pay all District's charges as they are invoiced. 6. In accordance with District Assessment District 96 -01, not attached hereto, but incorporated herein by reference, lots of /2 acre or less may have a % inch meter installed unless owner chooses to upgrade the meter and pay the additional fees and charges. Lots greater than '/2 acre but less than 3 acres re uire one -inch meters to be installed. Lots in excess of 3 acres re- wire a minimum 1'/2 inch meter to be installed. Larger meters may be required by the District, in its sole discretion. If it can be demonstrated that lots of a given area are not useable in gross, a de- viation in meter size may be made with the concurrence of the District Engineering Manager, 7. The District may require larger meters than the Assessment District 96 -01 lot size criteria would dictate if the individual residence requires water service greater than can be ac- commodated by the standard % inch meter irrespective of the lot size, in its sole discretion. S. Applicant's project is commingled with other parcels in the same area which taken together form a more complicated project tantamount to a subdivision. Applicant will be required to install any additional onsite or offsite facilities as may be determined by the District, in its sole discretion, to accommodate the water service to the surrounding parcels as well as any adjustments to existing facilities as may be required to provide continuing water service. 2 • Water Availability Letter roiect: Wildflower II Oaklev This letter of water availability pertains solely to the proposed project as described by applicant, is not transferable to any other project, and is not transferable to any other owner or developer without written permission of the Board of Directors of the District. Any purported transfer, sale, or assignment of this Water Availability Letter without the prior written consent of the District renders this letter null and void. This letter automatically terminates, and is of no further force or effect, on the occurrence of (1) May 19, 2000 without an approved tentative map; (2) termination of any tentative map; (3) ter- mination of any final map; or (4) five years from the date of recordation of any final map. OLIVE PAL WATER DISTRICT By: F.D.Fontanesi Engineering Administrator -At PROJECT FACILITY AVAILABILITY FORM — City of Encinitas WATER Please type or use pen ORG Jesse Oakley (714) 731 -8833 �UYti1U� Owners Name Phone ACCT 2171 Pavilion Drive ACT Owners Mailing Address Street TASK Santa Ana CA 92705 City State Zip DATE AMT $ - DISTRICT CASHIER'S USE ONLY Assessors Parcel Number(s) (Add extra it necessary) A. [] Major Subdivision (TM) [] Specific Plan or Specific Plan Amendment Eg Minor Subdivision (TPM) ❑ Certificate of Compliance: ❑ Rezone (Reclassification) from _ to _zone. ❑ Major Use Permit (MUP), purpose: ❑ Time Extension... Case No. ❑ Expired Map... Case No. ❑ Other B. ® Residential ....... Total Number of dwelling units ❑ Commercial ...... Gross floor area ❑Itl tA G It ©vv mom MM mom .■■ vv ovv ©vv My 4 ■■■ ■■ n us a ........ ross oor area ❑ Other ........... Gross floor area Thomas Bros, Page 1148 Grid C_5 Wildflower Dr. Project Address Street C. Total Project acreage 11.4 Total number of lots 4. + remainder Olivenhain 92024 Community Planning Area/Subregion Zip D. Is the project proposing the use of groundwater? ❑ Yes ® No Is the project proposing the use of reclaimed water? ❑ Yes ® No Owner /Applicant agrees to pay all necessary c truction costs, dedicate all district required easements to extend service to the project and COM L E ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY THE DISTRICT. By: S DI it nveft. rl Applicant's Sign lure. Date: 5/13.99 Address: 440 the e 1 En initas CA 92024 Phone: (760) 753 -5525 On completion of above, present to the district that provides fire rotection to com lete Section 2 and 3 below.) SECT I BE CO D BY DISTRICT Districtr� me to, Service area / A. tJ� Project is in the District. ❑ Project is not in the District but is with' the Sphere of Influence boundary, owner must apply for annexation. ❑ P oject Is not in the District and no Rhin Rs Sphere of Influence boundary. ❑ roject is not located entirely wi n the District and a potential boundary issue exists with the District. B. jj acilities to serve the project ARE ❑ ARE NOT reasonably expected to be available within the next 5 years based on the capital facility plans of the district. Explain in space below or on attached (Number of sheets) ❑ P jest will not be served for the following reason(s): C. District conditions are attached. Number of sheets attached: ❑ District has specific water reclamation conditions which are attached. Number of sheets attached: ❑ 05trict will submit conditions at a later date. �� D�y/)j�i�� D.o far il/l�the pipelines) have to be xt ynded to serve the project? �r CC / /�c ��'' Date: "� Expiration date: �l�' (One year from date of issuance unless district indicated otherwise.) Authorized s F.D.Fontanesi 760 - 753 -6466 Print title: Engineering Administrator NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A COMMITMENT OF SERVICE OR FACILITIES BY THE DISTRICT On completion of Section 2 by the District, applicant is to submit this form with application to: Zoning Counter at the Planning & Community Development Dept., 505 S. Vulcan Ave., Encinitas, CA 92024 DPLU s3e9wl9197l EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF ENCINITAS CHECK SHEET FOR: GRADING PLANS (References are to City of Encinitas Grading ordinance) Property Owner(s): OAV-L. -Y Engineer /Surveyor: SAP pianUkiD PLC NO. ITEM CHECK REMARKS A. GENERAL: 1. Fees 2. Three Blue line prints submitted. 3. Supporting data /calculations submitted. a Soils report. b Drainage calculations. c Structural calculations. d Geology report. (e) Landscape plan. _ f Irrigation plan. Application. (h) Letters of permission/ easements. (il Engineer's estimate. (j) Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. (k) Final Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. (1) work Schedule (prior to Permit issuance). m Other 4. Drafting requirements (each sheet (a) Prepared on City of Encinitas "D" Sheets 24" x 36" / b Drawn on m lar. (c) Drawn with black water - roof drawing ink. (d) All lettering to be a minimum of 1/8" in height. (e) Sheets numbered consecu- tively with total number of sheets indicated. Sheet 1 of 5 pol3742 (October 15, 1993) 19 NO. ITEM CHECK REMARKS (f) Engineer of work's signature and registration number on each sheet (g) Title block on each sheet contains: 1 Title: Grading Plan (2) Designation of sub- division if applicable. 3 City assigned plan number h Bench mark description. B. COVER SHEET; 1. Vicinity map with north arrow and scale indicated. 2. Key map (for projects covering several sheets. a North arrow. b Scale: 1" = 2001. (c) Shows general plan of sub- division with subdivision boundary, streets and lots identified. (d) Shows adjacent subdivisions and connecting streets. e Shows sheet coverage (f) Legend identifies all symbols used. Drainage facilities. h Direction of drainage flow. 3. Work to be done (general notes, notification notes, grading/ landscaping notes) and Soils J Engineer's Certificate. 4. Street cross - sections: a Each street represented. ✓ (b) Dimensions - right -of -way, sidewalks, medians, easements, etc. (c) Rough grade line shown with width and depth of grading— (d) Side slopes (2:1 max. cut, 2:1 max. fill). Sheet 2 of 5 po13742 (October 15, 1993) 20 NO. ITEM CHECK REMARKS 5. Legend identifies all syTrLbols used 6. Details shown as necessary. 7. Approvals by other agencies, as applicable. C. GRADING SHEETS: 1. Boundary lines shown: a City-County boundaries. b Subdivision boundaries. c Right of way lines. d Lot line dimensioned. i (e) Lot lines of adjacent properties. f utility easements. o en space or other easements 2. Contours (extend at least 50' beyond limits of radin a Existing contours shown. b Finish grade contours shown. 3. Lots a Numbered. (b) Building pads shown with ad elevations. / (c) Sufficient elevations flagged to show slope of lots and Portions of lots. 4. Grading: a Slopes: 1 Cut slopes - 2:1 max. / (2) Fill slopes - 2:1 max. (shaded). 3 Slope ratios shown. 4 Daylight line (s) shown. (5) off -site grading shown with reference to au- thority (notarized let- ters of ermission etc ). �g 5. Drainage: (a) Existing drainage facil- ities shown. (b) Further drainage facilities not a part of grading). —� REwS�OP1 (c) Drainage facilities. Only show system on G.P. if on improvement plans. Show profile, invert elevation, type, size and gage, if not on Im ry Plans. 1 Location. (2) Type, size, gage (strength). 3 Details as necessar Sheet 3 of 5 pol3742 (October 15, 1993) 21 S NO ITEM CHECK REMARKS (4) Elevations, grades, direction of flow. 5 Easements. 6. Streets show: a Names and dimensions. b Direction of street drainage. / c Percent of slope: fai Flevations at intersections. D. EROSION CONTROL PLANS. 1. Generally. (a) Provide when project will not be completed and landscaped through the rainy season. (b) Show on 60 %+ matte of grading plan. 2. Specifically. (a) Must accompany any grading plan submitted between August 1 and April 1. All grading plans for large projects must have an erosion control plan irre ardless of submittal date (b) Must show placement of facilities, specified location parameters that require field calculations are not / acceptable. (c) Must have provisions to access erosion control facilities during wet weather. 3: Additional information. (a) 24 hour telephone number for emergency erosion control and name of specific indivi- dual with authority and / responsibility for erosion control. (b) Schedule for completion of installation of erosion control facilities. (c) Erosion control planting and method of starting and main- taining growth irri ation . A- Standard Notes Sheet 5 of 5 po13742 (October 15, 1993) 22 I • . q. nqr - - awc..n- w...•... SEC7101 Cg= REMARKS 1. SIZE OF SKEET 664 4(bl 2. SCALE AND NORTH ARISEN 3. NUMBERING AND CROSS REFERENCE OF SHEETS 4 4. COUNTY TRACT DESIGNATION ON EACH SHEET 5. CAL. COORD. INDEX - GRADING PLAN NBER SHOWN b .� L N UM 6. COUNTY IN AMBER SOWN ON EACH q 8 7. SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE AND PRELIMINARY TITLE _ ,.�// / REPORT FURNISHED 81.302.5 6 8L.5D /(/D 6,.g4,IDNi�£ S. DEED AND CERTIFIED LEGAL DESCRIPTION FURNISHED 81.5 B- TITLE SHEET 1. CERTIFICATES: PROPER AND IN CORRECT LOCATION 81.511 66434(a), 66435, 6643G(a -d) 66439 66440 66441, 66442, 66443 2. PREAMBLE OF DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SHOWN 8 .50 3. SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE STATE-ENr SHOWN 81.508 4. CERTIFIED MEETS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION STATEMENT SHOWN S. DEDICATION CERTIFICATE COMPLETE 66439 & B 6. C'ONDORININMI NOTE OR PLANNED RESID@FFIAL NOTE SHOWN (IF RE IR ®) 7, OPEN SPACE EASEMENT GRANT CO S. OWNERS CERTIFICATE SHOWN AND AGREES WITH ✓ SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE 9. TRUSTEES CERTIFICATE SHOWN AND AGREES WITH SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE 66436 -C a 81.509 10. SUBORDINATION CERTIFICATE - SIGNATURE REQUIRED 66436 A 66439 11. 5 @lA111HE NOT REQUITED CEIaRPICATES 66436-0 12. IE TNTEAPST PARTIES ACCOUNTED ION 66436 a 81.509 ,13. C CENT PICOTS fOR ALL SIGNAIVRES 66436 14, BOND AND A55FSSMENT CERTIFICATE SHOWN e1. 507(a 15. ZC TANC CERTIFICATE COlbLETE 66440 16. D CONTMM. D STRICT ACCEPTANCE CEATIPICAIE SHOWN e1. 402(h 17. ENGINEER'S OR SURVEYOR'S CEHTIFICATB COlPL.ETE 66441 N Ile 18. HOARD O SUPERVISORS TAY CERTIFICATE SHOWN 81.507(b 19. CDUENTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE SHOWW 66441 £ _ 20. COUNTY COUNSEL CERTIFICATE SHOWN 81.507(d) 4 81.510 21. -RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE FOR ACCEPTANCE OF NAP 81.507 (el 22. MAP SIGNED AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY ALL INTERESTED PARTIES C. PROCEDURE OP SURVEY SHEET O ION AS REQUIRED BY COUNTY STANDARD PRACTICE A. SCALE 66434(b) b. VICINITY MAP C. GENERAL PLAN OP SUBDIVIBION SHOWN d. LOCATION IN RELATION TO SURROUNDING LAMPS, SECTION CORNERS, HIGHWAYS, ETC. 66434(e) c 01.5061a) e. TIE$ TO RECORD NONUNENTS 66434 cjl f. LEGEND: 1) FOUND MONUMENTS SHOWN AS CLOSED SYMBOL 2) SHT MONUMENTS SHOWN AS OPEN SYMBOL 3) MOUND MONUMENTS LABELED PER RECORD DATA (OR NO RECORD) 66434(c) fi 81.50 4) MONUMENTS SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 81.404(&-IL 5) MONUMENTS MARKED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION q. BASIS OF BEARINGS CORRECT AND COMPLETE 81.506 - h. TOTAL AREA( - ) 'VTOL NUMBER LOT9 (4 f AH'A) ✓ - BEGINNING AND ENDING LOT NUMBERS L. SOILS TEST REPORT NOTE 81.208 G 81.507(e) fi 81.512 66434 A A j. AREAS SUBJECT TO FID SHOWN LONE NAP 81,506LLL NA k. AfEA.a NDT INCLUDED IH SUB. NARKD: "NOT A PART OF l_ ' " THIS SUBDIVISION" Ff I1. TIES TO MON. SET AND FOUND INCLUDES OFFSET 66434 (rL TIES TO SURROUNDING TRACTS, BEARING G DISTANCE 6 n. RECORD BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN WHERE DIFFERENT FROM MEASURED O. HEAVY LINE AROUND BOINDAAY OP S[BDIVISION 1 SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY LABELED 2) P.O.H. G T.P.O.B. SHOWN Form 769 (7/78 -0572) PAGE 1 OF 3 ,I C COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - D DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - - C CHECK SHEET FOR SUBDIVISION NAPS COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TRACT EXTENDED EXPIRATION DATE ' N MCELROY .� CEANGES BITIAT'ED HY THE- N NOTE: THE COLORS RED 6 GREEN D DO NOT OBSCURE NOTATIONS ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR SHOULD A ARE RESERVED FOR DEPART EMT OF O ON PRINTS WHEN SHADING BE FLAGGED OUT ON NEW PRINTS T TRANSPORTATION USE ONLY O OFF CORRECTIONS SEC7101 Cg= REMARKS 1. SIZE OF SKEET 664 4(bl 2. SCALE AND NORTH ARISEN 3. NUMBERING AND CROSS REFERENCE OF SHEETS 4 4. COUNTY TRACT DESIGNATION ON EACH SHEET 5. CAL. COORD. INDEX - GRADING PLAN NBER SHOWN b .� L N UM 6. COUNTY IN AMBER SOWN ON EACH q 8 7. SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE AND PRELIMINARY TITLE _ ,.�// / REPORT FURNISHED 81.302.5 6 8L.5D /(/D 6,.g4,IDNi�£ S. DEED AND CERTIFIED LEGAL DESCRIPTION FURNISHED 81.5 B- TITLE SHEET 1. CERTIFICATES: PROPER AND IN CORRECT LOCATION 81.511 66434(a), 66435, 6643G(a -d) 66439 66440 66441, 66442, 66443 2. PREAMBLE OF DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SHOWN 8 .50 3. SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE STATE-ENr SHOWN 81.508 4. CERTIFIED MEETS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION STATEMENT SHOWN S. DEDICATION CERTIFICATE COMPLETE 66439 & B 6. C'ONDORININMI NOTE OR PLANNED RESID@FFIAL NOTE SHOWN (IF RE IR ®) 7, OPEN SPACE EASEMENT GRANT CO S. OWNERS CERTIFICATE SHOWN AND AGREES WITH ✓ SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE 9. TRUSTEES CERTIFICATE SHOWN AND AGREES WITH SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE 66436 -C a 81.509 10. SUBORDINATION CERTIFICATE - SIGNATURE REQUIRED 66436 A 66439 11. 5 @lA111HE NOT REQUITED CEIaRPICATES 66436-0 12. IE TNTEAPST PARTIES ACCOUNTED ION 66436 a 81.509 ,13. C CENT PICOTS fOR ALL SIGNAIVRES 66436 14, BOND AND A55FSSMENT CERTIFICATE SHOWN e1. 507(a 15. ZC TANC CERTIFICATE COlbLETE 66440 16. D CONTMM. D STRICT ACCEPTANCE CEATIPICAIE SHOWN e1. 402(h 17. ENGINEER'S OR SURVEYOR'S CEHTIFICATB COlPL.ETE 66441 N Ile 18. HOARD O SUPERVISORS TAY CERTIFICATE SHOWN 81.507(b 19. CDUENTY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE SHOWW 66441 £ _ 20. COUNTY COUNSEL CERTIFICATE SHOWN 81.507(d) 4 81.510 21. -RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE FOR ACCEPTANCE OF NAP 81.507 (el 22. MAP SIGNED AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY ALL INTERESTED PARTIES C. PROCEDURE OP SURVEY SHEET O ION AS REQUIRED BY COUNTY STANDARD PRACTICE A. SCALE 66434(b) b. VICINITY MAP C. GENERAL PLAN OP SUBDIVIBION SHOWN d. LOCATION IN RELATION TO SURROUNDING LAMPS, SECTION CORNERS, HIGHWAYS, ETC. 66434(e) c 01.5061a) e. TIE$ TO RECORD NONUNENTS 66434 cjl f. LEGEND: 1) FOUND MONUMENTS SHOWN AS CLOSED SYMBOL 2) SHT MONUMENTS SHOWN AS OPEN SYMBOL 3) MOUND MONUMENTS LABELED PER RECORD DATA (OR NO RECORD) 66434(c) fi 81.50 4) MONUMENTS SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 81.404(&-IL 5) MONUMENTS MARKED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION q. BASIS OF BEARINGS CORRECT AND COMPLETE 81.506 - h. TOTAL AREA( - ) 'VTOL NUMBER LOT9 (4 f AH'A) ✓ - BEGINNING AND ENDING LOT NUMBERS L. SOILS TEST REPORT NOTE 81.208 G 81.507(e) fi 81.512 66434 A A j. AREAS SUBJECT TO FID SHOWN LONE NAP 81,506LLL NA k. AfEA.a NDT INCLUDED IH SUB. NARKD: "NOT A PART OF l_ ' " THIS SUBDIVISION" Ff I1. TIES TO MON. SET AND FOUND INCLUDES OFFSET 66434 (rL TIES TO SURROUNDING TRACTS, BEARING G DISTANCE 6 n. RECORD BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN WHERE DIFFERENT FROM MEASURED O. HEAVY LINE AROUND BOINDAAY OP S[BDIVISION 1 SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY LABELED 2) P.O.H. G T.P.O.B. SHOWN Form 769 (7/78 -0572) PAGE 1 OF 3 Form 769 (7/78 -0572) PAGE 1 OF 3 p -. CFJTW ITEMS 1. STREET VAC 2. ANNEXATION 3. ZONE RECLA 4. 'GEOLOGY RE ). 5'. FIRE PROTE 6. LETTER FRO 7. CATV LETTE S. CONFORMANC (WITHIN 9. LETTER FRO CONSENTI 10, COASTAL CO 11. 1)(PROVP1ff.N 12. IMPROVEMEN 13. FEES: a. MAP FE b. LIGNTI e. IMPROV d. LAB e. LOT ST I. TRAM R. BRIDGE h. PARR P 1. PLAN C J. GRAADIN k. GRADIN I. EROS IO v. OTHER: 1) _ 2) _ 3) _ 4) _ 14. 15. WITH COMMUNITY PLAN - SPECIFIC PLAN LETTER FROM L.U.R.R.1 F. COUNTY PROCESSING CHECK LIST 1. MAP SIGNED 6 ACKNOWLEDGE a. OWNERS b. TRUSTEES C. SUBORDINATION CERTIP d. e. 2. ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE S AGENDA DATE 3. MAP SIGNED BY FLOOD CONT 4. MAP SIGNED BY COUNTY ENG 5. IRRIGATION DISTRICT TAX 6. COPY OF E.I.H. FOR BOARD 7. SMALL MAP FOR BOARD S. BOARD LETTER PREPARED 9. INSTRUMENT OF CREDIT FOR (IF REQUIRED) 10. BOND PACKAGE OR INSTRUME PREPARED, EXECUTED, AN 11. TAX BOND 12. PARK BOND OR CERTIFIED C 13. ALL ITEMS OF RESOLUTION 14_ 15. 16. 17. IN PAGE 3 OF 3 8 Recording Requested By: City Engineer When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 THE pmt INAL OF THIS DOCUMENT WAS RECORDED & FEB 09, 20D4k DOCUMENT OBER 2(04 - 0101826 GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 4:08 PM SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR DRAINAGE Assessor's Parcel No.262- 073 -24 Project No.: 6442 -G /98 -039 A. M & M DEVELOPMENT LLC A CALOFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly shown on drawing number ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of 6442 -G by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. F. Failure of OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: Dated Dated Dated Dated 3 M DE+IEU-,1PriGN LL (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached.) CI Y OF EN CINITAS 1 Dated by (Notarization not required) Peter Cota - Robles Director of Engineering Services CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of S LA A 0 ke' o On > iiiifj ay S, 'Dey before me, Q.otjui I-\- We -A, WCA -iry 1,/bl�r b.. N-nw arq TM d aremr t•.y.. •,Nw o... III" IALfc'I personally appeared G e oilif"l O. 1AQ1IvtS Ner„NR d sgwls) ROBERT M. NEILL r Commission M 1296654 a3 -� Notary Public - California g San Diego County My COMM. Expires MQ20, 2005 ❑ personally known to me rA proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(% whose name(W QlaYe subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that®shelthlfy executed the same in J�iRr/thOir authorized capacity(X), and that by (ohb /00ir signature() on the instrument the person(), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(5) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS yrp hand and official seal. (�CJe.(,,: M A,✓4 sy,. d Nd.y P OPTIONAL Though the information below Is not required by law it my prove valuable to persons retying on the dx:ument and Could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: (0qt-% % -J 9 4 "a l Document Date: e11cis) 04 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is V,C.I , III C1 Number of Pages: RIGHT THUAIBPRINT OF SIGNER C 1999 NaM l Nauq An ;,aiM - 9350 d Sato Ave.. PO Bo, 2. - CraOW CA 9131}2A • www.rullane Ic l Prof. M 597 Re iiiii UN To -Free 1 {IOM1 7] 7 ATTACHMENT A TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR DRAINAGE PROJECT NO. 6442 -G The North Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 13 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plat thereof. ATTACHMENT B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR DRAINAGE PROJECT NO. 6442 -G OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS 1. For claims that are alleged to have arisen, directly or indirectly, from drainage or runoff associated with the PROPERTY or the plans, design, construction or maintenance of OWNER' s improvements, OWNER unconditionally waives all present and future claims against CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees, and agents. This waiver does not apply to claims that are alleged to have arisen out of the sole, active negligence or deliberate, wrongful act of CITY. 2. It is further understood and agreed that all of OWNER'S rights under §1542 of the Civil Code of, the State of California and any similar law of any state or territory of the United States are hereby expressly waived. 9 1542 reads as follows: 1542. Certain claims not affected by general release. A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor. 3. OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of OWNER or OWNER's agents, employees, subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives. Upon demand, OWNER shall, at its own expense, defend CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all such liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs. OWNER' s obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the plans, specifications and design of the improvements; but does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of a defect in the plans, specifications or design that is a result of a change required by CITY to the OWNER's proposed plans, specifications or design so long as such change is objected to, in writing, by OWNER, and the writing is filed with the City Engineer more than ten days prior to the commencement of work. OWNER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to privately maintaining all storm drain facilities on private land as shown on said drawing 6642 -G that receive public storm drain runoff water from public storm drain facilities and public streets. OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defence thereof, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of OWNER or OWNER's agents, employees, subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives in regards to receiving said public storm drain runoff onto private land. OWNER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the construction of the improvements; alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the improvements; alleged injury to persons or property; and any alleged inverse condemnation of property as a consequence of the design, construction, or maintenance of the improvements. By approving the improvement plans, specifications and design or by inspecting or approving the improvements, CITY shall not have waived the protections afforded herein to CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents or diminished the obligation of OWNER who shall remain obligated in the same degree to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless as provided above. OWNER's obligation herein does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of the CITY's intentional wrongful acts, CITY's violations of law, or CITY's sole active negligence. 4. OWNER hereby agrees not to develop in any manner the PROPERTY except as authorized by CITY's ordinances and then only in accordance with issued permits. Among other things, but without limitation, this shall prohibit the alteration of land forms, removal of vegetation and the erection of structures of any type, except as permitted or authorization by CITY. 5. This Covenant does not Preclude OWNER taking emergency, protective measures as approved by CITY. Recording requested by: When Recorded Mail To: District Clerk j Cardiff Sanitation District ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92024 ) 3763 DCC 2- 000 - 0160597 MOR 30, 2000 8:30 OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH COUNTY RECORDER FEES: 53.1X 111111111111111111111111111VI 2000 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel No. 264 - 091 -SA Project No.:TPM 98 -139 W. O. No.: CS -315 Af'1 A. Jesse R. Oakley as to an undivided 67.22328 interest, and Kevin K. Takabayashi and Suzanne M. Takabayashi, as Community Property as to an undivided 13.7768% interest, ( "SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TPM 98 -139 hereinafter) and which is described as follows: ( "PROPERTY" See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the improvement plans for the required improvements by the Cardiff Sanitation District ( "DISTRICT" hereinafter), SUBDIVIDER hereby TF /03 /COV2- 308wp51 1(4/26/91 -1) 10e15a 1 JAN 90 �P 37ju DOC 2 000 -01bQ5 Recording Requested By: ) MOR JO . 000 0:19 AM City of Encinitas ) OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE When Recorded Mail to: ) GREGORY J. SMITH, LINTY RECORDER City Clerk ) FEES: 32.00 City of Encinitas Ens nitass, Vulcan Avenue CA 024 SPACE ABOVE FOl IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 2000- 0160593 PRIVATE ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR TPM 98 -139 Assessor's Parcel No. 264- 091 -58 Project No.: TPM 98 -139 W.O. No.: 6062 PM THIS AGREEMENT for the maintenance and repair of that certain private road easement, the legal description and/or plat of which is set forth in Exhibits attached hereto and those private drainage facilities, the legal description and/or plat of which is set foi-th in Exhibits attached hereto and made a part hereof, is entered into by Jesse R. Oakley _ as to an undivided 67.2232% interest and Kevin K. Takaba ashi an d Suzanne M. Takaba ashi as community ro ert as to an undivided 32.7768% interest- (hereinafter referred to as "Developer ") for the benefit of future subdivision lot owners who will use the private road easement (hereinafter referred to as "lot owners ", which Shall include the Developer to the extent the Developer retains any ownership interest in any lot or lots). WHEREAS, this Agreement is required as a condition of approval by the City of Encinitas of a subdivision project as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources code and pursuant to City of Encinitas Municipal Code Section 24.16.060 and Section 24.29.040; and WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of certain real property being subdivided and developed as TPM 98 -139 that will use and enjoy the benefit of said road easement. A complete legal description of said real property is attached, labeled Attachment A , and incorporated by reference. Said real property is hereinafter referred to as the "property"; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Developer that said private road easement and drainage facilities be maintained in a safe and usable condition by the lot owners; and 3'1 Recording Requested by: When Recorded Mail To City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 DOG 2-000 - 0160596 MAR 30, 2000 8 =27 17,00 OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COWTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, COWY RECORDER l 2000 0160596 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE n COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. I/ Assessor's Parcel AM Project No.:TPM 98 -139 W.O. No.: 6062 GR/ 6075 GR A.Jesse R. Oakley as to an undivided 67.22328 interest, and Kevin K. Takabayashi and Suzanne M. Takabayashi, as Community Property as to an undivided 32.77688 interest, (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TPM 98 -139 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of private improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required private improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City 10e15epm 8/12/91 SAN DIEGO CWNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, COIMTY RECORDER DOC WS 2000- 0160593 MAR 30, 2000 8:19 AM RECORDING: 13.00 ADD'L RECORDING: 9.00 MICROGRAPHICS: 1.00 TRIAL CONRT: 8.00 CONF. COPY: 1.D0 TOTAL DUE: 32.00 TOTAL TENDERED: _ -32.00 THE URIGIA OF HIS DOCUMENT Recording Requested By: ) A RECORDED ON Mai 30' 2OW DODKNT SMI H9 I COUNTY RECORDER City of Encinitas ) 5RN DIEGO CUTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 8:19 AM When Recorded Mail to: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas. CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY PRIVATE ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR TPM 98 -139 Assessor's Parcel No. 264- 091 -58 Project No.: TPM 98 -139 W.O. No.: 6062 PM THIS AGREEMENT for the maintenance and repair of that certain private road easement, the legal description and/or plat of which is set forth in Exhibits attached hereto and those private drainage facilities, the legal description and/or plat of which is set foi-th in Exhibits attached hereto and made a part hereof, is entered into by, Jesse R. Oakley as to an undivided 67.2232% interest and Kevin K Takabavashi and Suzanne M. Takabavashi, as community property as to an undivided 32.7768% interest• (hereinafter referred to as "Developer ") for the benefit of future subdivision lot owners who will use the private road easement (hereinafter referred to as "lot owners ", which Shall include the Developer to the extent the Developer retains any ownership interest in any lot or lots). WHEREAS, this Agreement is required as a condition of approval by the City of Encinitas of a subdivision project as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources code and pursuant to City of Encinitas Municipal Code Section 24.16.060 and Section 24.29.040; and WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of certain real property being subdivided and developed as TPM 98 -139 that will use and enjoy the benefit of said road easement. A complete legal description of said real property is attached, labeled Attachment A , and incorporated by reference. Said real property is hereinafter referred to as the "property"; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Developer that said private road easement and drainage facilities be maintained in a safe and usable condition by the lot owners; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Developer to establish a method for the maintenance and repair of said private road easement and drainage facilities and for the apportionment of the expense of such maintenance and repair among existing and future lot owners; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Developer that this Agreement constitute a covenant running with the land, binding upon each successive lot owner of all or any portion of the property. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: .1. The property is benefttted by this Agreement, and present and successive lot owners of all or any portion of the property are expressly bound hereby for the benefit of the land. 2. The cost and expense of maintaining the private road easement and drainage facilities shall be divided equally among the subdivided parcels created in the subdivision and paid by the lot owner of the heirs, assigns and successors in interest or each such owner. 3. In the event any of the herein described parcels of land are subdivided further, the lot owners, heirs, assigns and successors in interest of each such newly created parcel shall be liable under this Agreement for their then pro rata share of expenses and such pro rata shares of expenses shall be computed to reflect such newly created parcels. 4. The repairs and maintenance to be performed under this Agreement shall be limited to the following unless the consent for additional work is agreed to by a majority vote of the lot owners owning 100% of the number of parcels, including subdivisions thereof as described in Paragraph 3 above: reasonable and normal road improvement and maintenance work to adequately maintain said private road easement and drainage facilities to permit all - weather access and conveyance of storm flows. Repairs and maintenance under this Agreement shall include, but is not limited to, filling of chuckholes, repairing cracks, repairing and resurfacing of roadbeds, repairing and maintaining drainage structures, removing debris, maintaining signs, markers, striping and lighting, if any, and other work reasonably necessary and proper to repair and preserve the easement for all- weather road purposes. 5. If there is a covenant, agreement, or other obligation imposed as a condition of subdivision approval to make private road improvements to the private road easement, the obligation to repair and maintain the private road easement as herein set forth shall commence when the private road improvements have been completed and approved by the City. 6. Any extraordinary repair required to correct damage to said road easement or drainage facility that results from action taken or contracted for by lot owners or their successors in interest shall be paid for by the party taking action or party contracting for work which caused the necessity for the extraordinary repair. The repair shall be such as to restore the road easement or drainage facility to the condition existing prior to said damage. 7. It is agreed that Developer is initially the agent to contract and oversee and do all acts necessary to accomplish the repairs and maintenance required and/or authorized under this Agreement. Developer further agrees that the agent may at any time be replaced at the direction of a majority of the lot owners. Repair and maintenance work on the private road easement and drainage facilities shall be commenced when a majority of the lot owners agree in writing that such work is needed. The agent shall obtain three bids from licensed contractors and shall accept the lowest of said three bids and shall then initiate the work. The agent shall be paid for all costs incurred including a reasonable compensation for the agent's services, and such costs shall be added to and paid as a part of the repair and maintenance costs; provided, however, that compensation for the agent's services shall in no event exceed an amount equivalent to 10% of the actual cost of repairs and maintenance performed. In performing his duties, the agent, as he anticipates the need for funds, shall notify the parties and each party shall within forty-five (45) days pay the agent, who shall maintain a trustee account and also maintain accurate accounting records which are to be available for inspection by any party or authorized agent upon reasonable request. All such records shall be retained by the agent for a period of five years, 8. Should any lot owner fail to pay the pro rata share of costs and expenses as provided in this Agreement, then the agent or any lot owner or owners shall be entitled without further notice to institute legal action for the collection of funds advanced on behalf of such lot owner in accordance with the provisions of California Civil Code Section 845, and shall be entitled to recover in such action in addition to the funds advanced, interest thereon at the current prime rate of interest, until paid, all costs and disbursements of such action, including such sum or sums as the Court may fix as and for a reasonable attorneys fees. 9. Any liability of the lot owners for personal injury to the agent hereunder, or to any worker efnployed to make repairs or provide maintenance under this Agreement, or to third persons, as well as any liability of the lot owners for damage to the property of agent, or any such worker, or of any third persons, as a result of or arising out of repairs and maintenance under this Agreement, shall be borne, as between the lot owners in the same percentages as they bear the costs and expenses of such repairs and maintenance. Each lot owner shall be responsible for and maintain his own insurance, if any. By this Agreement, the Developer does not intend to provide for the sharing of liability with respect to personal injury or property damag4 other than that attributable to the repairs and maintenance undertaken under this Agreement Each of the lot owners agrees to indemnify the others from any and all liability for injury to himself or damage to his property when such injury or damage results from, arises out of, or is attributable to any maintenance or repairs undertaken pursuant to this Agreement. 10. Lot owners shall jointly and severally defend and indemnify and hold harmless City, City's engineer and its consultants and each of its officials, directors, officers, agents and employees from and against all liability, claims, damages, losses, expenses, personal injury and other costs, including costs of defense and attorney's fees, to the agent hereunder or to any lot owner, any contractor, any subcontractor, any user of the road easement, or to any other third persons arising out of or in any way related to the use of, repair or maintenance of, or the failure to repair or maintain the private road easement or drainage facilities. Nothing in the Agreement, the specifications or other contract documents or City's approval of the plans and specifications or inspection of the work is intended to include a review, inspection acknowledgement of a responsibility for any such matter, and City,; City's engineer and its consultants, and each of its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents, shall have no responsibility or liability therefore. 11. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land and shall be deemed to be for the benefit of the land of each of the lot owners and each and every person who shall at anytime own all or any portion of the property referred to herein. 12. It is understood and agreed that the covenants herein contained shall be binding on the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assignees of each of the lot owners. 13. It is the purpose of the signatories hereto that this instrument be recorded to the end and intent that the obligation hereby created shall be and constitute a covenant running with the land and any subsequent purchaser of all or any portion thereof, by acceptance of delivery of a deed and/or conveyance regardless of form, shall be deemed to have consented to and become bound by these presents, including without limitation, the right of any person entitled to enforce the terms of this Agreement to institute legal action as provided in Paragraph 8 hereof, such remedy to be cumulative and in addition to other remedies provided in this Agreement and to all other remedies at law or in equity. 14. The terms of this Agreement may be amended in writing upon majority approval of the lot owners and consent of the City. 15. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, the validity, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby. 16. If the Property constitutes a "Common Interest Development" as defined in California Civil Code Section 1351(c) which will include membership in or ownership of an "Association" as defined in California Civil Code Section 1351(a), anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, the following provisions shall apply at and during such time as (i) the Property is encumbered by a "Declaration" (as defined in California Civil Code Section 1351(h), and (ii) the Common Area of the property (including the private road easement) is managed and controlled by an Association: (a) The Association, through its Board of Directors, shall repair and maintain the private road easement and drainage facilities and shall be deemed the "agent" as referred to in Paragraph 7 above. The Association, which shall not be replaced except by amendment to the Declaration, shall receive no compensation for performing such duties. The costs of such maintenance and repair shall be assessed against each owner and his subdivision interest in the Property pursuant to the Declaration. The assessments shall be deposited in the Association's corporate account. (b) The provisions in the Declaration which provide for assessment liens in favor of the Association and enforcement thereof shall supersede Paragraph 8 of the Agreement in its entirety. No individual owners shall have the right to alter, maintain or repair any of the Common Area (as defined in California Civil Code Section 1351(b) in the Property except as may be allowed by the Declaration. (c) This Agreement shall not be interpreted in any manner which redtices or limits the Association's rights and duties pursuant to its Bylaws and Declaration. IN WITI]ESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the z% `ten day of QL7 W2& 19q. Developer. ech Signature of DEVELOPER must be notarized. Aappropriate' c ow edgem ATTACHMENT "A" TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -139 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 005'09" EAST, 524.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 4 026'14" EAST, 328.94 FEET, THENCE NORTH 84 °31'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 °03'22" EAST, 500.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 71 007'30" EAST, 263.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 30.10 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 053'06" TO THE CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTERLINE IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 °36'54"; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 015'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 038'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33 °16'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 034'36" WEST, 263.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 °58'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 032'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84 005'09" WEST, 313.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. File u File u: "dala44460suMa1wch -a.wpd i 5E PARCEL 1 EXHIBIT 'A' CITY T C. r) " ,c 8_ 83 25. PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT — • llel PARCEL 3 PROPOSED PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT lzz-- PARCEL 2 \ PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT ROB 140739 PROPOSED PRIVATE ROAD ANp UTILITY EASEME T N PROPOSED \ FLOWAGE EASEMENT 10' PARCEL 4 1 � O� PROPOSERIVATE \ DRAINAGE EASEMENT �� REMAINDER PARCEL SZO PROJECT CITY OF ENC/N/TAS T.PAIE 88-138 PLAT SCALE, is. 160' PRIVATE ROAD AAD DRAMGE FAC[ITY MAWENANCE AGREEAENT SAN DEQUTO ENO EERM INC. JUL NO 4460 CIVL ENONEERM - PLAN NM DATE OCTOM 19 AW I ANfl PJIRVPYMA U: \7 data prma— Iegal.dwa CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CAl! looQN/A County of lei ?j q on /0-26-91 before me,hP,,g_Lcrj e 14 • RiaEblatar tJ o mf �t/G Dale Nav1w and TAIa 4 OIBUr Ie y.,'Ja1r Doa, Nolary P WK) personally appeared J 4 personally known to me – OR – ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) istare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/herAheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument •. DARLENE H. RINEHAR G :COMMISSION #1114637 � ai Notary Pudic - Calibmla � 2 � ORANGE COUNTY O My COmmis6lpn Fxpires OCT 26, 2000 WITNESS my hand and official seal. 16J.r11RIJI n sq.n.. a Ndary Pu04 Thot9h doe mlomralion below u not required by law, R may prom valuable to persons re yirg on the obn ffienr and court preoerrt fraudulent renaovaf and marrachmenr or Mis form lo anorher document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: c Fi9GiLl4t,,�. C Number of Pages: Signer (s) Other Than Named Above: KEV /a lL T/4k464W4_&dSQZ1QAAV M rFliiJOl]OVAS, Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Tille(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited In ❑ General Attomey -in -Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator WIVIN, WNW ❑ Other. Top d Thumb here Signer Is Representing: 0 1 991 Nalmnal Notary A%So 1110M • 0236 Remmel Ave P 0 Boa 7104 • Cam, PaA, CA 91309 7184 P•o8 No S907 Reo.eer C.0 rdr Fea 1 800- B76 -W7 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of C g(,l/---0r),P,u /14" County of On ! O - Z� - 5 eF before me, rP r1E /I • /niC�7 i(JQ) 9� / v L Ora f Mr1� eld Tea a aacoae 10 t.'.1aw Ow. Mawr PI,EkcT personally appeared KeV1n){�•Tiz{GAfae1/,1M i; �SJLiAnI1JCM-%- i4)eobA�iASNi wa,e(a) d sywlp ❑ personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) istare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sheRhey executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument • •. DARLENE H. RINEHAR S : coMFAlssloN #7114637 WITNESS my hand and official seal. � 0 Notary Pudic - California 3 _ � ORANGE COUNTY O My Commission Expires c�-- ��l�Y OCT 26, 2000 SgwN.- of Notary PaMc OPTIONAL Though the InNml OM below n not required by law, it may prove vahrabfe to persons retying m nle dcaunenf and cmdd prvvww fraudulem removal and reaffachrn of or this roan b molrier document Description of Attached Document n,r Title or Type of Document: el VAT1: �* Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual Corporate Officer Tltle(s): Partner — ❑ Limited Affomey -in -Fact Trustee ❑ General Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual N, Number of Pages: Corporate Officer Trffe(s): Partner — ❑ Limited Attorney -in -Fact Trustee ❑ General Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGHT THI 1r1PgRWT OF SGYER 0 1 YA Nahml al Wary Assorialion • 0236 f1em el Ave , PO Box 7184 • Camp Park, CA 91309 7184 P, A No 5907 Reartlec Call Toll Fru 1 800 976 l7 SH'N DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, MINTY RECORDER DOC WS 2000 -01605% MAR 30, 2000 8:27 AM RECORDING: 18.00 ADD'L RECORDING: 14.00 MICROGRAPHICS: 1.00 TRIAL =I: 13.00 COff. COPY: 1.00 TOTAL DUE: 47.00 TOTAL TENDERED: - - -- 47.00 Recording Requested by When Recorded Mail To City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 THE u,i6INAL OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS RECORDED ON MAR ,'A. 4000 DOQIMENT NUMBER ?(HBO- 01h0ri'l ; GREGORY J. SMITH. COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 8:27 AM SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel 1• Project No. :TPM 9 8 -13 9 W.O. No.: 6062 GR/ 6075 GR A. Jesse R. Oakley as to an undivided 67.2232% interest, and Kevin K. Takabayashi and Suzanne M. Takabayashi, as Community Property as to an undivided 32.77688 interest, (SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TPM 98 -139 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of private improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required private improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the subdivision of the PROPERTY by the City 10el5epm 8/12/91 of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter) , SUBDIVIDER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Exhibit B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. SUBDIVIDER agrees that SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. F. Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. G. Upon SUBDIVIDER's satisfactory completion of SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations contained herein, SUBDIVIDER may request and CITY shall execute a Satisfaction of Covenant. 10e15epm 8/12/91 H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against SUBDIVIDER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED. Dated Iu —) 0' 91 Dated Dated Dated Dated (Notarization of SUBDIVIDER signature is attached.) CITY OF ENCINITAS Dated U- I-�—q"k by (Notarization not required) 10e15epm 8/12/91 F, lt; 6; �-- � A TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -139 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 005'09" EAST, 524.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 4 026'14" EAST, 328.94 FEET, THENCE NORTH 84031'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1890322" EAST, 500.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 71 007'30" EAST, 263.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 30.10 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 °53'06" TO THE CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTERLINE IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 °26'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6018'44 THENCE SOUTH 17052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7036'54 "; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10015'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4038'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 33016'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 54034'36" WEST, 263.59 FEET, THENCE NORTH 34058'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74032'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84005'09" WEST, 313.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. File u File u: \ldata \"60surv\attach -awed 10e15epm 8/12/91 F,4 k ATTACMgENT B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -139 SUBDIVIDER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS Name of SUBDIVIDER: Oakley and Takabayashi, et al. Tract or Parcel Map Number Name of Subdivision: TPM 98 -139 Resolution of Approval Number: DCD -99 -07 Adopted: 2/22/99 Estimated total cost of improvements: $414,565.00 1. IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED 1.1 SUBDIVIDER agrees at SUBDIVIDER's own cost and expense to furnish all the labor, equipment and materials to perform and complete, in accordance with the plans and specifications and to the satisfaction and approval of the City Engineer, all of the private improvements referred to below: Improvement plans for 6062 G/6075 G, sheets I through 5 dated 0'T —IjLtj i000 and prepared by _ SAN l) EctAiro L,46R.JUC , as approved on 3 2-91 ZGO( by the City Engineer together with any subsequent amendments approved in writing by the City Engineer; on file with CITY in City Engineer's Office and incorporated herein as though fully set forth at length. 10e15epm 8/12/91 1.2 Further, SUBDIVIDER agrees to perform the following conditions: ,)e 55E R. OAkLS( Lk-71 Pnvi��ioN Da��E SANTA ANA CA 2.0 PROGRESS OF WORK 2.1 Time is of the essence with this Covenant. SUBDIVIDER shall commence substantial construction of the private improvements required by this Covenant not later than JLIIy LC)02 and shall complete the private improvements no later than -kPR \L 'LGC1> In the event good cause exists, as determined by the City Engineer, the time for commencement of construction or completion of the private improvements hereunder may be extended. Any such extension may be granted without notice to SUBDIVIDER's Surety or Sureties, if any, and shall in no way affect the validity of this Covenant or release the Surety or Sureties on any security given for the faithful performance of this Covenant. The City Engineer shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDER to an extension. As a condition of 10e15epm 8/12/91 such extensions, the City Engineer may require SUBDIVIDER to furnish new security guaranteeing performance of this Covenant, as extended, in an increased amount as necessary to compensate for any increase in construction costs as determined by the City Engineer. 2.2 If any of the private improvements are to be constructed or installed on land not owned by SUBDIVIDER, no construction or installation shall be commenced prior to SUBDIVIDER demonstrating to CITY that SUBDIVIDER has acquired the appropriate property interests. 2.3 SUBDIVIDER shall, at SUBDIVIDER's expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction of the private improvements and give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law. 2.4 SUBDIVIDER shall notify the City Engineer in writing at least 15 days prior to the commencement of work hereunder. No construction work shall begin until authorized by CITY. 2.5 SUBDIVIDER shall not be entitled to obtain occupancy permits for the buildings constructed on any lot created by the subdivision until all required improvements have been provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2.6 SUBDIVIDER shall at all times maintain safe construction facilities, and provide safe access, for inspection CITY, to all parts of the work and to the shops wherein the work is in preparation. 2.7 SUBDIVIDER shall give good and adequate warning to the public to each and every existing danger relating to the 10e15epm 8/12/91 construction of the private improvements, and shall protect the public from such dangers. 3. INSPECTION /APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS 3.1 The City Engineer or his duly authorized representative, upon request of SUBDIVIDER, shall inspect, at SUBDIVIDER's expense, the private improvements herein agreed to be constructed and installed by SUBDIVIDER. If determined to be in accordance with applicable CITY standards and the other terms of this Covenant, the City Engineer shall approve the improvements. 3.2 SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay for each inspection of the improvements required by the City Engineer. 3.3 Approval of the private improvements by CITY, shall not constitute a waiver by CITY of any defects in the improvements. 3.4 Until such time as the private improvements required by this Covenant are fully completed by SUBDIVIDER and approved by the City Engineer, SUBDIVIDER will be responsible for the care, maintenance, repair and replacement of such private improvements. 4.0 HOLD HARMLESS 4.1 SUBDIVIDER agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of SUBDIVIDER or SUBDIVIDER's agents, employees, subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives. Upon demand, SUBDIVIDER shall, at its own expense, defend CITY and 10e15epm 8/12/91 CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all such liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs. 4.2 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the plans, specifications and design of the private improvements; but does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of a defect in the plans, specifications or design that is a result of a change required by CITY to SUBDIVIDER's proposed plans, specifications or design so long as such change is objected to, in writing, by SUBDIVIDER, and the writing is filed with the City Engineer more than ten days prior to the commencement of work. 4.3 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the construction of the private improvements; alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the private improvements; alleged injury to persons or property; alleged inverse condemnation of property or a consequence of the design, construction, or maintenance of the work or the private improvements; and any accident, loss or damage to the work or the private improvements prior to the approval of the construction of the private improvements by CITY. 4.4 By approving the improvement plans, specifications and design or by inspecting or approving the private improvements, CITY shall not have waived the protections afforded herein to CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents or diminished the obligation of SUBDIVIDER who shall remain obligated in the same 10e15epm 8/12/91 degree to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless as provided above. 4.5 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of CITY's intentional wrongful acts, CITY's violations of law, or CITY's sole active negligence. 5.0 INSURANCE 5.1 SUBDIVIDER shall obtain and maintain a policy of motor vehicle liability, public liability, general liability and property damage insurance from an insurance company approved by CITY and authorized to do business in the State of California, in an insurable amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence. The insurance policy shall provide that the policy shall remain in force during the life of this COVENANT and shall not be canceled, terminated, or allowed to expire without thirty (30) days prior written notice to CITY from the insurance company. 5.2 CITY shall be named as an additional insured on SUBDIVIDER's policies. 5.3 SUBDIVIDER shall furnish certificates of said insurance to CITY prior to commencement of work under this AGREEMENT. 6.0 REPAIR, MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT As a condition on the approval by CITY of the satisfactory construction of the private improvements, SUBDIVIDER shall prepare, have executed, and record a covenant, in a form satisfactory to CITY, whereby property owners who will be served by the private 10e15epn 8/12/91 improvements will be obligated to provide for the repair, maintenance and replacement of the private improvements and to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless. 7.0 NOTICES 7.1 Any notices to be given under this COVENANT, or otherwise, shall be served by certified mail. 7.2 For the purposes hereof, unless otherwise provided in writing by the parties hereto, the address of CITY and the proper person to receive any such notice on its behalf is: City Engineer City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 and the address of SUBDIVIDER and the proper person to receive any such notice on its behalf is: 8.0 SUBDIVIDER'S CERTIFICATION OF AWARENESS OF IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT OF 1986 SUBDIVIDER certifies that SUBDIVIDER is aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (8 USC SS 1101 -1525) and will comply with these requirements, including but not limited to verifying the eligibility for 10e15epm 8/12/91 employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors and consultants that are included in, satisfy the duties and obligations contained herein. 9.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 9.1 Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of SUBDIVIDER's agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of CITY in connection with the performance of SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations under this Covenant. 9.2 Sale or other disposition of the PROPERTY will not relieve SUBDIVIDER from the duties and obligations set forth herein. 9.3 SUBDIVIDER shall provide the improvements as an independent contractor and in pursuit of SUBDIVIDER's independent calling, and not as an employee of CITY. SUBDIVIDER shall not be under control of CITY except as to the result to be accomplished. SUBDIVIDER may confer with CITY as required to perform this Covenant. 9.4 No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, official, agent or employee of CITY, either before, during or after the execution of this Covenant, shall effect or modify any of the terms or obligations herein contained. 10el5epm 8/12/91 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT County of On 10•Zl0 - 99 before me,DARJ,&JL LY • I�i�EJyA2T �(� rti-V C Daw _ Nama aA Tdla d Oldur le.a..'J. Ooa. Notary P Whiq personally appeared 4ersonally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helsheAhey executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the persori or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. DARLENE N. RINENAR WITNESS my hand and official seat. � COMM13910N Mlli4fi97 � ? ah ,Notary Public - Glibrtwa ///111 My Commission Expnes JJ /� Sigrrwre d Nwry NYC OPTIONAL Though the in Eton below is no( requred by law, of may prove vakmbla to persons reyvg on the docu n rt and could prevent fraudulent removal and reaffachment of tho form to another docaenenf Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document }/gj_yAit %1UyF�YJG Ji`� �LOW�260 AS ON�il7d� O Pi Js� U Document Date: / Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: (CgVIa k, rFiFF�J9�ASIlJ t S-L)Z 1r we M %A I ,,:3bAVA Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name F1 Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Pariner — ❑Limited ❑ Anomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ General ❑ Guardian or Conservator [ I Other: Signer Is Representing. RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ Attomey -in -Fact ❑ General ❑ Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Other. Signer Is Representing: qIG IT THUt'10PRIM OF SIGNER 0 t994 Nabmal Notary As sodallon • 02M Remmel A", PO Boa 7104 • Canoga PaM, CA 91309 7184 Prod. No S907 Reoaler Cad Toll FSaa l M 676 GO CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of C A 1. / i rpg tj r ty County of 02A t'jq L On— _ 0 Zil cJ `7 before me: AP1LAJ6 14 ICI 1)6 N0M 1'Yn� ad Ti b d OINc,.r (e.9..'Jan� ow. NoYrr P1EK') personally appeared d 5()2,40t)E M• T<IC4,6Q Na-.(f) d sq,e.Is) O personally known to me – OR – ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) islare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helshefthey executed the same in his/herAheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. DARLENE H. RINEHAR WITNESS my hand and official seal - o ; :COMMISSION #1114637 g is ,Notary Pudic - Calllomia My Commission 6cpires I�Lr �xf /f'.,� C,� y1�7/ /�� OCT 26, 2000 sq.rtwv d Meteor P., OPTIONAL Though the mlomtafian below is not regtred by law, ( may prow valuable to parsons re4wV on Te dononeor and Cadd WahvR fraudulent removal and reattachment of alias fonrl to another dbct9rnent Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ■ Individual Corporate Officer Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited Anomey -in -Fact Trustee ❑ General Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: N rabc. Number of Pages: Signer's Name: U Individual U Corporate Officer Tiffe(s): • Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General • Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator F) Other. Signer Is Representing RIGHT THUt.'BPRINT OF SIGNER 0 1994 Naamal Nalaq Assa 411an • 8216 Re n rrl Ave P 0 Boa 7184 • Canaga Pa,a. CA 91309 7194 P, A No 5907 Rer tivr Ca11 rdl Free F900 876 W7 , LJ Recording Requested By: When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 W THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT WAS RECORDED ON DEC 17, 1`f'39 DOCUMENT NUMBER 1999-0817934 GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECIRD0 SAN DIEGO CO(KY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME. 8:57 AM SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR GRADING /DRAINAGE Assessor's Parcel No. 264 - 091 -58 Project N:o.: TPM 98 -139 W.O. Nei.: 6062 -a /6075 -G A. Jesse R. Oakley _ _ as to an undivided 67.2232$ interest, aiid Kevin K. Takabayashi and Suzanne M_ Takahavashi. as rnmmnnity nrnnerty ac to an nnr1i viAa,1 "47 77 A, A% interest, ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of the approval of TPM 98 -139; 6062 -G /6075 -G by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. 10E10e.ADA 01/03/95 • D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. F. Failure of OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: p OWNE Dated �D / Dated (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached.) XCITY OF INITAS Dated C by //J (Notarization not required) 4ity Manager 10E10e.ADA 01/03/95 V CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California ss. County of D Ill n) q W On before me2D?`QRt&A)6_h(• eliJi-�MW_i /V 0%LW ll G Date _ Name and Title of Officer (e.g.. -Jane Doe. Notary PoblC) personally appeared DARLENE H. RINEHAR .COMMISSION #1114637 o Notary Public - California 3 x ORANGE COUNTY O MY Commission Expires OCT 26, 2000 Place Notary Seal Above ,'personally known to me _] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Puol,c OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, if may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document Description of Attached Document Q Title or Type of Document: 6. if Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:Kiwid k. TAE- JdtlH1IASPii I. S02,tw Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: • Individual mP o1 I E nale • Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: 0 197 National Notary Association •9350 Do Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • ChatsimM, CA 919132402 Prod. No 5907 Reamer'. Call Toll -Free 1- 800.876 -6827 W CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Stale of Ck)(r1170Rnifd County of 0"1016 LJ On L o. N �T �r before me, sp vcce?u� W .ICI iW¢i" I V D�RLr Akic- oats - n.11. .d Td- a O0ec4e p.g-. •LAW oo.. Novi I y pwwl personally appeared ❑ personally known to me – OR – ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) istare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helshelthey executed the same in his(herRheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. DARLENE H. RINEHARTJ COMMISSION #1114637 WITNESS my hand and official seal. s Nolary Public - Calilomla _ ORANGE COUNTY o MY Commission Expires OCT 26, 2000 sy.... a Hots,' P116se OPTIONAL Tho gh fhe infa6msbm HslI is nor n quYed by raw, if may prove vahlabb to Parsons feWV m Ire domm lent and could pmmw haudWeTlf fernovaf and reaftachmenf of this fonrl b anoRrer don mem Description of Attached Document C.ov - Rawc- Titleor Type of Document: 6!P112 LD CL7�l �iA2a111 SS FOr26,64 &q F t ,per Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: gel Individual Corporate Officer Ttle(s): Partner — ❑ Limited Anomey -in -Fact Trustee ❑ General ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): O Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact O Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Other. Signer Is Representing RIGHT THLJ SPRWT OF SIGNER ee I r4 NZVW41 n9gn As 5ousoon -51: Memii4AW. PO. Box 7104 • C400y4 PaM CA 91309 7114 PIOA. N9. 5907 84ader CAN Td6Fr44 1600.1176,a07 w w ATTACHMENT A TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR GRADING /DRAINAGE PROJECT NO. `1S -kS°t PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 005'09" EAST, 524.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 4 °26'14" EAST, 328.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 031'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 °03'22" EAST, 500.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF.SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23,1991; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 71 007'30" EAST, 263.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 30.10 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 053'06" TO THE CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTERLINE IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 036'54'; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 °15'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 038'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33 016'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 034'36" WEST, 263.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 058'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 032'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84 005'09" WEST, 313.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. File u File uAldaW4460surv\attach -a.wpd 10E10e.ADA 01/03/95 W W ATTACHMENT B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR GRADING /DRAINAGE PROJECT NO. 7-pm 6)8- t39 OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS 1. For claims that are alleged to have arisen, directly or indirectly, from any grading or drainage damages associated with the PROPERTY or the plans, design, construction or maintenance of OWNER's improvements, OWNER unconditionally waives all present and future claims against CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees, and agents. This waiver does not apply to claims that are alleged to have arisen out of the sole, active negligence or deliberate, wrongful act of CITY. 2. It is further understood and agreed that all of OWNER'S rights under § 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California and any similar law of any state or territory of the United States are hereby expressly waived. § 1542 reads as follows: 1542. Certain claims not affected by general release. A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor. 3. OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of OWNER or OWNER's agents, employees, 10E10e.ADA 01/03/95 V L-A, subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives. Upon demand, OWNER shall, at its own expense, defend CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all such liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs. OWNER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the plans, specifications and design of the improvements; but does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of a defect in the plans, specifications or design that is a result of a change required by CITY to the OWNER's proposed plans, specifications or design so long as such change is objected to, in writing, by OWNER, and the writing is filed with the City Engineer more than ten days prior to the commencement of work. OWNER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the construction of the improvements; alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the improvements; alleged injury to persons or property; and any alleged inverse condemnation of property as a consequence of the design, construction, or maintenance of the improvements. By approving the improvement plans, specifications and design or by inspecting or approving the improvements, CITY shall not have waived the protections afforded herein to CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents or diminished the obligation of OWNER who shall remain obligated in the same degree to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, 10E10e.ADA 01/03/95 employees and agents, harmless as provided above. OWNER's obligation herein does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of CITY's intentional wrongful acts, CITY's violations of law, or CITY's sole active negligence. 4. OWNER hereby agrees not to develop in any manner the PROPERTY except as authorized by CITY's ordinances and then only in accordance with issued permits. Among other things, but without limitation, this shall prohibit the alteration of land forms, removal of vegetation and the erection of structures of any type, except as permitted or authorization by CITY. 5. This Covenant does not preclude OWNER taking emergency, protective measures as approved by CITY. 10E10e.ADA 01/03/95 SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGOW J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER EjC U'S 2000- 0160599 MAR 30, 2000 8:30 AM RECORDING: 20.00 ADD'L REMII6: 16.00 MICROGRAPHICS: 1.00 TRIAL COURT: 15.00 COW. COPY: 1.00 TOTAL DUE: 53.00 TOTAL TENDERED: 53.00 Recording requested by: When Recorded Mail To: District Clerk Cardiff Sanitation District 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 THt w,IGINk OF THIS DOCUMENT W RECORDED ON MAR 30, 2000 DOCUMENT NUMBER 2000 - 0160597 GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO CUTY REMR'S OFFICE TIME: 8:30 AM SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel No. 264 - 091 -58 Project No. :TPM 98 -139 W. O. No.: CS -315 A. Jesse R. Oakley as to an undivided 67.2232% interest, and Kevin K. Takabayashi and Suzanne M. Takabavashi, as Communitv Property as to an undivided 13.7768% interest, ( "SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TPM 98 -139 hereinafter) and which is described as follows: ( "PROPERTY" See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the improvement plans for the required improvements by the Cardiff Sanitation District ( "DISTRICT" hereinafter), SUBDIVIDER hereby TF /03 /COV2- 308wp51 1(4/26/91 -1) 10e15a 1 JAN 90 covenants and agrees for the benefit of DISTRICT, to do the following: See Exhibit B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. SUBDIVIDER agrees that SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, DISTRICT may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to DISTRICT by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. F. Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by DISTRICT of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. G. Upon SUBDIVIDER's satisfactory completion of SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations contained herein, SUBDIVIDER may request and DISTRICT shall execute a Satisfaction of Covenant. H. By action of the Board of Directors, DISTRICT may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against SUBDIVIDER. TF /03/COV2- 308wp51 2(4/26/91 -1) 10el5a 1 JAN 90 *TTAeHXBiPP A TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -139 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 005'09" -EAST, 524.35. FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH�46 P4" EAST, 328.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 °31'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE 14ORTH 18803'22" EAST,. 500.43 FEET TO THE :SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF..SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 71 007'30" EAST, 263.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A- TANGENT.1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 30.10 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 053'06" TO THE CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTERLINE IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 ", THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 036'54 "; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 °15'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 038'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33 016'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 034'36" WEST, 263.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 °58'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 032'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84 °05'09" WEST, 313.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TF /031COV2- 308WP51 4(4/26/91-1) 10e15a 1 JAN 90 Pile u F: le u: \IdataA460sury \a ach -a. wpd ACCEPTED AND AGREED. IN Dated 10 .-�o a9 Dated (Notarization of SUBDIVIDER signature is attached.) Dated 1 -1�1 [M CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT by _, p 0� C' D 1 Clerk of the Board (Notarization not required) TF /03 /COV2-308wp51 3(4/26/91 -1) 10e1Sa 1 JAN 90 F,A ; /,F AT2T,AQH4tEXT- B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -139 SUBDIVIDER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS Name of SUBDIVIDER: Oaklev and Takabayashi, et al. Tract or Parcel Map Number Name of Subdivision: TPM 98 -139 Resolution of Approval Number: pm -qg -07 Adopted:2/22/gg Estimated total cost of improvements: $414,565.00 1.0 IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED 1.1 SUBDIVIDER agrees at SUBDIVIDER's own cost and expense to furnish all the labor, equipment and materials to perform and complete, in accordance with the plans and specifications and to the satisfaction and approval of the District Engineer, all of the improvements referred to below: Improvement plans for CS -315 I sheets L through dated �-ZI-LGDO and prepared by ,SAN DIEGU�TO F- NGR.JIIC., as approved on 3 2 to by the District Engineer together with any subsequent amendments approved in writing by the District Engineer; on file with DISTRICT in the District Office and incorporated herein as though fully set forth at length. 1.2 Further, SUBDIVIDER agrees to perform the following conditions: TF /03/COV2- 308wp51 5(4/26/91 -1) 10e15a 1 JAN 90 RESOLUTION CONDITIONS: 2.0 PROGRESS OF WORK 2.1 Time is of the essence with this Covenant. SUBDIVIDER shall commence substantial construction \ of the limprovements required by this Covenant not later than 1 uLY \ , L.COl- and shall complete the improvements no later than Ap \ , �DO3 In the event good cause exists, as determined by the District Engineer, the time for commencement of construction or completion of the improvements hereunder may be extended. Any such extension may be granted without notice to SUBDIVIDER's Surety or Sureties, if any, and shall in no way affect the validity of this Covenant or release the Surety or Sureties on any security given for the faithful performance of this Covenant. The District Engineer shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle SUBDIVIDER to an extension. As a condition of such extensions, the District Engineer may require SUBDIVIDER to furnish new security guaranteeing performance of this Covenant, as extended, in an increased amount as necessary to compensate for any increase in construction costs as determined by the District Engineer. 2.2 If any of the public improvements are to be constructed or installed on land not owned by SUBDIVIDER, no construction or installation shall be commenced prior to the acquisition and TF /03 /COV2- 308wp51 6(4/26/91 -1) 10e15a 1 JAN 90 acceptance by DISTRICT of appropriate property interests. SUBDIVIDER shall pay the actual costs of acquisition of such property interests. 2.3 SUBDIVIDER shall, at SUBDIVIDER's expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction of the improvements and give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law. 2.4 SUBDIVIDER shall notify the District Engineer in writing at least 15 days prior to the commencement of work hereunder. No construction work shall begin until authorized by DISTRICT. 2.5 SUBDIVIDER shall not be entitled to obtain occupancy permits for the buildings constructed on any lot created by the subdivision until all required improvements have been provided to the satisfaction of the District Engineer. 2.6 SUBDIVIDER shall at all times maintain safe construction facilities, and provide safe access, for inspection by DISTRICT, to all parts of the work and to the shops wherein the work is in preparation. 2.7 SUBDIVIDER shall give good and adequate warning to the public to each and every existing danger relating to the construction of the improvements, and shall protect the public from such dangers. TF /03 /COV2- 3O8wp51 7(4/26/91 -1) 10e15a 1 JAN 90 3.0 INSPECTION /ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS 3.1 The District Engineer or his duly authorized representative, upon request of SUBDIVIDER, shall inspect, at SUBDIVIDER's expense, the improvements herein agreed to be constructed and installed by SUBDIVIDER. If determined to be in accordance with applicable DISTRICT standards and the other terms of this Covenant, the District Engineer shall approve the improvements and recommend the acceptance of the public improvements by DISTRICT through resolution of the Board of Directors of the Cardiff Sanitation District. 3.2 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay for each inspection of the improvements required by the District Engineer. 3.3 Approval of the improvements and acceptance of the public improvements by DISTRICT, shall not constitute a waiver by DISTRICT of any defects in the improvements. 3.4 Until such time as the improvements required by this Covenant are fully completed by SUBDIVIDER, approved by the District Engineer and the public improvements are accepted by DISTRICT, SUBDIVIDER will be responsible for the care, maintenance, repair and replacement of such public improvements. 4.0 GUARANTEE /WARRANTY 4.1 ONE YEAR. SUBDIVIDER hereby guarantees and warrants the public improvements constructed pursuant to this Covenant for a period of one year after final acceptance of said work to include design, work, labor and materials furnished. If within the one year period, any public improvement or part of any public improvement furnished, installed or constructed, or caused to be furnished, installed or constructed by SUBDIVIDER, fails to fulfill TF /03/COV2- 308wp51 8(4/26/91 -1) 10el5a 1 JAN 90 any of the requirements of this Covenant or otherwise fails to function to the satisfaction of the DISTRICT, SUBDIVIDER shall without delay and without any cost to DISTRICT, repair, replace or reconstruct any failing part or parts of the public improvement. 4.2 TEN YEARS. For ten years following the acceptance by DISTRICT of the public improvements, SUBDIVIDER shall remain obligated to cure all identified defects in the design, construction, materials of the public improvements. 5.0 SECURITY 5.1 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS A. Prior to the sale or transfer of all or any portion of this Subdivision, or prior to the issuance of any development permits for this Subdivision, SUBDIVIDER shall furnish to DISTRICT good and sufficient security in the form of a cash deposit, letter of credit, or other security as approved by the District Engineer in the amount of 150% of the then - current estimate of the construction costs of the improvements to assure faithful performance of this Covenant. B. In the event that changes, alterations or additions to the improvement plans and specifications or to the improvements add 10% or more to the original estimated costs of the improvements, SUBDIVIDER shall provide additional security in a form satisfactory to DISTRICT in an amount equal to 100% of the total estimated increase in the construction cost of the improvements. The amount of the additional security may be adjusted by the amount of work completed and any prior, partial releases of security. 5.2 FOR ONE YEAR GUARANTEE/ WARRANTY. SUBDIVIDER shall TF /03/COV2- 308wp51 9(4/26/91 -1) 10el5a 1 JAN 90 furnish to DISTRICT good and sufficient security, in the form of a cash deposit, letter of credit or other security as approved by the City Engineer, in the amount of 25% of the estimated total cost of the public improvements, to secure SUBDIVIDER's guarantee and warranty specified herein for a period of one year following the acceptance by DISTRICT of the public improvements. 6.0 CURING OF DEFAULTS 6.1 In the event that SUBDIVIDER fails to perform any duty or obligation imposed by this Covenant, SUBDIVIDER hereby authorizes DISTRICT, at DISTRICT's option, to perform such duty or obligation twenty (20) days after DISTRICT mails written notice of default to SUBDIVIDER and SUBDIVIDER fails to cure such default. SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay the actual costs of such performance by DISTRICT. The security posted by SUBDIVIDER pursuant to this Covenant may be used by DISTRICT for the completion of such performance, but shall not limit SUBDIVIDER's liability. 6.2 In the event of SUBDIVIDER'S uncured default, DISTRICT may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or by any other method DISTRICT may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER shall be liable to DISTRICT for the actual costs or damages occasioned DISTRICT thereby. Without liability for so doing, DISTRICT may take possession of the construction site and the work. In completing the work, DISTRICT may utilize such materials, appliances, plants and other property belonging to SUBDIVIDER as may be on the site of the work and necessary therefore. 6.3 Should the exigencies of the case require repairs, replacements, or work to be done before SUBDIVIDER can be notified TF /03 /COV2- 308wp51 10(4/26/91 -1) 10e15a 1 JAN 90 and given 20 days to perform, DISTRICT may, at DISTRICT's option and without liability, make the necessary repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work and SUBDIVIDER shall pay to DISTRICT the actual costs of so doing. 7.0 HOLD HARMLESS 7.1 SUBDIVIDER agrees to indemnify and hold DISTRICT and DISTRICT's officers, officials, employees and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of SUBDIVIDER or SUBDIVIDER's agents, employees, subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives. Upon demand, SUBDIVIDER shall, at its own expense, defend DISTRICT and DISTRICT's officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all such liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs. 7.2 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the plans, specifications and design of the improvements; but does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of a defect in the plans, specifications or design that is a result of a change required by DISTRICT to the SUBDIVIDER's proposed plans, specifications or design so long as such change is objected to, in writing, by the SUBDIVIDER, and the writing is filed with the District Engineer more than ten days prior to the commencement of work. 7.3 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein includes, but is not TF /03 /COV2- 308wp51 11(4/26/91 -1) 10e15a 1 JAN 90 limited to, alleged defects in the construction of the improvements; alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the improvements; alleged injury to persons or property; alleged inverse condemnation of property or a consequence of the design, construction, or maintenance of the work or the improvements; and any accident, loss or damage to the work or the improvements prior to the acceptance of same by DISTRICT. 7.4 By approving the improvement plans, specifications and design; by inspecting or approving the improvements; or by accepting the public improvements, DISTRICT shall not have waived the protections afforded herein to DISTRICT and DISTRICT's officers, officials, employees and agents or diminished the obligation of SUBDIVIDER who shall remain obligated in the same degree to indemnify and hold DISTRICT and DISTRICT's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless as provided above. 7.5 SUBDIVIDER's obligation herein does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of DISTRICT's intentional wrongful acts, DISTRICT's violations of law, or DISTRICT's sole active negligence. TF /03/COV2- 308wp51 12(4/26/91 -1) 10e15a 1 JAN 90 8.0 INSURANCE 8.1 The SUBDIVIDER shall obtain and maintain a policy of motor vehicle liability, public liability, general liability and property damage insurance from an insurance company approved by DISTRICT and authorized to do business in the State of California, in an insurable amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence or aggregate. The insurance policy shall provide that the policy shall remain in force during the life of this COVENANT and shall not be canceled, terminated, or allowed to expire without thirty (30) days prior written notice to DISTRICT from the insurance company. 8.2 DISTRICT shall be named as an additional insured on SUBDIVIDER's policies. 8.3 SUBDIVIDER shall furnish certificates of said insurance to DISTRICT prior to commencement of work under this AGREEMENT. 9.0 NOTICES 9.1 Any notices to be given under this COVENANT, or otherwise, shall be served by certified mail. 9.2 For the purposes hereof, unless otherwise provided in writing by the parties hereto, the address of DISTRICT and the proper person to receive any such notice on its behalf is: District Engineer Cardiff Sanitation District 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 and the address of SUBDIVIDER and the proper person to receive any such notice on its behalf is: TF /03 /COV2- 308Wp51 13(4/26/91 -1) 10e15a 1 JAN 90 10.0 SUBDIVIDER'S CERTIFICATION OF AWARENESS OF IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT OF 1986 SUBDIVIDER certifies that SUBDIVIDER is aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (8 USC SS 1101 -1525) and will comply with these requirements, including but not limited to verifying the eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors and consultants that are included in, satisfy the duties and obligations contained herein. 11.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 11.1 Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any of SUBDIVIDER's agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents of DISTRICT in connection with the performance of SUBDIVIDER's duties and obligations under this Covenant. 11.2 Sale or other disposition of the PROPERTY will not relieve SUBDIVIDER from the duties and obligations set forth herein. 11.3 SUBDIVIDER shall provide the improvements as an independent contractor and in pursuit of SUBDIVIDER's independent calling, and not as an employee of DISTRICT. SUBDIVIDER shall not be under control of the DISTRICT except as to the result to be accomplished. SUBDIVIDER may confer with DISTRICT as required to perform this Covenant. 11.4 No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, official, agent or employee of DISTRICT, either before, during or after the execution of this Covenant, shall effect or modify any of the terms or obligations herein contained. TF /03 /COV2- 308wp51 14(4/26/91 -1) 10e15a 1 JAN 90 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT staleof C.ALIPaetjjA County of 61e A /J q & On /0.2+0.9 9 before meZA?IEVGd . 2laffy,,g', A O1Xa2✓ ��lb�ic Dab � Narna anq Tale A Olbnr le. y., -Jasb Daa, Nolan Pub personally appeared personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) istare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sheRhey executed the same in his/herAheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by hislher/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. DARLENE H. RINEHAR m WITNESS hand and official seal. cornMlssxxa #1114637 y � u Notary Public - Ca4krtlia � _ � ORANGE COUNTY O /j My Commission Expires -i\ �, /f /',1 � /// �•.• •• OCT 26. 2000 �t � /IX [� —� Sgatu.e d 11ubry W09c OPTIONAL TAolrpl &* nTamaanon beAvw m rW requwed by Taw, it may prove vakoble a persons re4wlg or1 me doaxr,N+rr and cuurd pmavw* naudulenr removar and reafrachmerx of Vats roan to another oocumenc Description of Attached Document /� Title or Type of Document: LAV• �e i�i5RL r/L(JP y /�d VCAI, J5 Document Date: vt Number of Pages: / - ' Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:IC�VJA) 1S.' I r ^ 4&1" 5V% wa I f 1 • �/�k46Q1AS 1 Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Tifie(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General • Attomey -in -Fad • Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attomey -in -Fact • Trustee • Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other. Signer Is Representing: RIGHT TNUrdePRWT OF SIGNER 0 1 994 National Notary Association - 82]6 Femmel Ave. PO Boa 7184 • Camp Pad. CA 913094194 P.pQ Nn 5907 %ortier Call TOM F,ae 1 800 876 -W7 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Stale of Co L f ?OeN l.4 County of Agin g Q E On 10-V-95 before me,1)Ge a a le) Ogwq ,, A)LY)y Dab"�.a• far a onxa. (..q.. •J.11. oft. Nal.r i Irn personally appeared /--eyjl k.7- juA&V&S0/ 6ZZjJA)k%Em•TPS - A9Vh51Y1 f_I personally known to me – OR – ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/herAheir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. _ •. DARLENE H. RINEHAR WITNESS m hand and official seal. commissioN #1114637 Y u _ Notary Pudic - Calilornia _ ORANGE COUNTY OI My Commission Expires OCT . 2000 S,yaaB d Nwry Pw! OPTIONAL Thoto the mlomrafian below is not ragired by law, if may Prove valuada to persons Myi^9 on lne domenent and Couhl poVwif fraudulent removal and reattadlmenf of It" foam to anwlfw document. Description of Attached Document Cuv 12, Title or Type of Document: t32r+) Document Date: ^ 1 Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: SP.SS� 1 C n o . A k t., Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual • Corporate Officer Tn e(s): • Partner — ❑ Limited i ❑ General Aftomey -in -Fad Trustee Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: _ ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other. Top of lhumb be e Signer Is Representing: 0 1994 Nahmal Nobry Assn l,on -52M Remmel Ave. PO Bos 7104 • Canaga Pad, . Ca 91309.7194 P,od Nn 510/ aeroer Ca9 Toll F,se l 90o 8 :6 a ) Recording requested by: ) 14 When--R or a Ma ) District Clerk O l Cardiff Sanitation District 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 ) JRIGINAL OF THIS DOCMNT WAS RECORDED ON SEP 10, 1439 DODWff NUMBER 1949- 0621916 GREGORY J. SMITH, COLNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO GUM RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 8:32 AN SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AS CONDITION ON FINAL APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION OF REAL PROPERTY. Assessor's Parcel No. 260 - 073 -24 A Ruben 3, LLC Project No.: TPM 98 -119 W. O. No.: 5844 -PM ( "SUBDIVIDER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TPM 9R -119 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. The tentative subdivision of the PROPERTY was approved with the final approval subject to certain conditions requiring the construction of improvements by SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVIDER has applied for final approval of the subdivision but has not constructed the required improvements. In consideration of the final approval of the improvement plans for the required improvements by the Cardiff Sanitation District ( "DISTRICT" hereinafter) , SUBDIVIDER hereby TF /03/COV2- 308wp51 1(4/26/91 -1) 10e15a 1 JAN 90 TIE usiGINAL OF THIS DOD)ff WAS RECORDED ON DEC 17, 1"4 DOq;IENI HlM 1"1793;, GREGORY J. SMITH, C UTY RECORDER SAM DTEGO LDNTY RECatDER'S `1FFICF WhAn Recorded Mail To: TIME: 8:5h AM City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY FUTURE PARK, TRAFFIC, AND FLOOD CONTROL FEES Assessor's Parcel Number: 264- 091 -58 Project No. TPM 98 -139 A. Jesse R. Oakley _ _ an undivided 67.2232% interest, and Kevin K. Takabavashi and Suzanne M. Takabavashi, as community property as to an undivided 32.7768% interest, ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TPM 98 -139 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows: See Attachment "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of Final Parcel Map approval for the above referenced project by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment "B" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the other party. Cov6267 tco 10/05/99 F. Failure of the OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. G. Upon OWNER's satisfaction of OWNER's duties and obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and CITY shall execute a "Satisfaction of Covenant ". H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: Is ./ Dated 10 — �1.0 — Ct I Dated II - 7 f — 72 Dated10 -ai (Notarization of OWNER sig a is attac ed) ATTACH NOTARY HERE CITY OF ENCINITAS q Dated li 0, y - 2 �� «45 - (Notarization not required Bill Weedman, City Planner Cov6267 tco 10/05/99 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Stale of C Ai.I )3oeNIJ4 County of DRAIJ gfr On before — me % G ly.. "Jar a. g Claw r 7Ar a 2P, Orr personally appeared d S41vUl 1personally known to me – OR – ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) Were subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helsheAhey executed the same in histherRheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by hislher/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. DARLENE H. RINEHAR COMMISSION #1114637 WITNESS my hand and official seal. s Notary Public - California M _ ORANGE COUNTY o ��• /lam My Commlasion Expires OCT 26, 2000 SL/WO d /1drrT Pro! OPTIONAL Tho;0 the ln/nmralker below is not required by law. N may prove valuable b pennon relying on lire doLVmer* and cmM paw" haudiler" rerrloval arnd readadnmerrf of Om John b anolher dDMnerK Description of Attached Document Tilde or Type of Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:9,5U // K TAKAbAyf)SNl 4' ,�j)LANi/JE m TAea1AjL Qy Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name- 1) Individual O Corporate Officer Trtle(s): 0 O O ❑ Partner — O Limited O General Anomey -in -Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing. RIGHT THUN18PRINT OF SIGNER Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — O Limited O Attorney-in-Fact O Trustee O General • Guardian or Conservator • Other. Signer Is Representing: RIGHT THLVEIPRINT OF SIGNER 0 19941 National Notary Aasoualion - 92]6 Rem M Are . PO Box 7164 - Camga PaM. CA 91]09.7184 P,o No 5941 Rrordrr CaN TOO Free 1 600 076 W7 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of C,a L f OQjiJiA'' County of OVA riq On 0' 11 . 99 beforeme,�/uGr �• n In)GAIQP /VDV7AAN PU(,�iu DoM vv Nome in0 TNe M O11kw (a.4, •.lane doe, No18ry PuON.'1 personally appeared 1� EU!�) K . 7'K• r1 Ab01Li9tsCl% s SJ?An1ti{E M • DA k2Q6A ✓ N/1 Nrlslal w syre,pt l personally known to me – OR – ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) istare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helsheAhey executed the same in hWher/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /herAheir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. DARLENE N. RINFWARTD COMMISSION #1114637 m - Notary Pudic - California ORANGE COUNTY o MY s OCT 2GT 26, 200D WITNESS my hand and official seal, OPTIONAL 51vreNn a Nobry Pu68c though the tnrumlatron below is not requ*W by raw, it may prove valt ade to persons mlyirg on the doc irnerit and could prevent fraudulent nennaysf and reattachment of ells Torn to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Trtle(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Atlomey -in -Fact U Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: r G Number of Pages: Signer's Name ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): • Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General • Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other. Signer Is Representing: FRIGHT THUGIBPFIMT OF SrGNER 9 1994 Hallo i Nonq As sodallun • 5236 Rnmsel A", PO Bw 7184 • CAro96 Park CA 91309 7194 P,.d. N. 5907 Rewtler CAN lr9, Fae I aw aY6 -w? ATTACHMENT "A" TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -139 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 005'09" EAST, 524.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 4 026'14" EAST, 328.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 031'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 003'22 ". EAST, 500.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23,1991 ' THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 71 007'30" EAST, 263.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 30.10 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 053'06" TO THE CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTERLINE IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 °26'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 036'54'; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10°15'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 038'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 33 016'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 034'36" WEST, 263.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 058'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 032'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84 °05'09" WEST, 313.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Sip ENO SUA! d * 306 Q +\ OF CA� O Cov6267 cco 10/05/99 File u File a \ldata\44450surv\attach -a.wpd PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ATTACHMENT "B" TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY PROJECT NO. TPM 98-139 OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS A. In accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 23.98 in effect at time of fees being paid, park fees for the development shall be paid prior to Final Occupancy approval. B. In accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 23.94 in effect at time of fees being paid, traffic fees for the development shall be paid prior to Final Occupancy approval. C. In accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 23.96 in effect at time of fees being paid, flood control fees shall be assessed and collected during the building permit processing prior to the construction of any impervious surfaces. Cov6267 tco 10/05/99 Recording Requested ) 'HE LffiGINk OF THIS DOM ENT City of Encinitas ) WAS RECORDED ON DEC 17, 1999 When Recorded Mail To: ) DOD" MUMMER 1999- 0817%4 GREGORY J. SMITH, COWN FEMUR City Clerk ) SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S IFFICF City of Encinitas ) TIME: 8:59 RM 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY WAIVER OF PROTEST TO ASSESSMENTS Assessor's Parcel No. 264- 091 -58 Project No.: TPM 98 -139 W.O. No: 6062 PM A. Jesse R. Oakley — as to an undivided interest, and Kevin K. Takabayashi and Suzanne M. Takabavashi. as community oroverty as to an undivided 32.77688 Interest, ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as TPM 98 -139 ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of TPM 98 -139 by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter) , OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. TM /04/AG2- 125wp5 (1 -28 -91/1) 10e40 1 JAN 90 E. If eithe party is required to incur ,)sts to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. F. Failure of OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. G. Upon OWNER's satisfaction of OWNER's duties and obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and CITY shall execute a Satisfaction of Covenant. H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: Dated Dated (Notarization of OWNER signature is attache�`�' CITY OF ENCINITAS Dated r% by / (Notarization not required) Iibity Manager TM /04/AG2- 125wp5 (1 -28 -91/1) 10e40 1 JAN 90 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Stale of G,:) L rp,,erJ1R* County of 01er,a tw3r On before me, 1 �f�!['it CAJE lCI A) C.i]PT Dar �r Nrna alto Tft OF Olaws J, q., -Jens, Dw, Nally PWO personally appeared 1�personally known to me – OR – ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) //'' whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sheAhey executed the same in his/herAheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. �r?y,,DAR LENE H. RINEHAR • ' COMMISSION #1114637 V2 WITNESS my hand and official seal. Y Notary Public - California _ ORANGE COUNTY D MY OCT Commission Expires k /• z, OCT 26, 200D ✓ a a191n1w• d Notvy P1O4 OPTIONAL naxio BM kfamit atlan bebw is rot regrAhld by Am of may pan vaAJabia b persons re4vV art tw docwrw* and could prevenf lraudulenf remover mid r"Nadmefif of dais form to another obcurnerai. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Documentt Ay 6?B i?WL R Waf4e or eurasr TV 44 ;S, sin go-r-10 Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:Kf;V1aK XV11 QI100/ di Ir'iJ2AAWL M- 1 A)GAEi9;/A SNi Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: R■ ❑ Individual Corporate Officer Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited Attorney- in -Fac. General Trustee Guardian Or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: �RIGRT THUhIBPRINT OF SIGNER Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Altomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Other. Signer Is Representing: RIGNT TRUf.1ePRINT OF SIGNER 0 1994 Nabmal Notary Assodaban • 6936 Pma A", PO boa 7004 • Camga Park CA 91309 -7154 Prod. N. 5907 RtorOrr call T&I Fraa I 076 -6127 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of CA L L fffo,e tJ is County of 0 2 A t Ill On D ' zi • 9 g before meZA9L&6 A Cl debar , A)Qr,994 Puhl r c7 D.M - Nrru .r1! Ta4 d Qllor (� L. �l4A Dot NOWr Pu01x') personalty appeared J ❑ personally known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helshe/Ihey executed the same in his/herAheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by hisAterAheir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument OPTIONAL Thagh the n/omrallon Debw u not requred by law, R may p4vva v& able b persats TefywV w M dnawnerx and Could Pra✓enf baudiiant r val and reattachment of Ma rom9 to another obaxnant Description of Attached �- Document n Title or Type of Document: WV - +el�C. ZgAa. W Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: IL-55e 00 Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual • Corporate Officer Title(s): • Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General • Attorney -in -Fact • Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGHT THUM1IBPRINT OF SIGNER Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): • Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General • Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Other. Signer Is Representing RIGHT THI:L'ePRINT OF SIGNER S 0 1994 N.I,.nal N.I.N AYS.O. u • 9236 %em A. P O Boa 7104 • C..,. P.M. CA 91309 7194 P,o N. 5907 Nem tr Co Tdl -Frn 1 BOP 676 -WIF • . DARLENE H. RINEHAR COMMI;SION M1114637 WITNESS my hand and official seal. � ai Nnlsn Publk - CalNomia � =ANOE COUNTY O My Commission Expires _ n -`1� OCT 26, 20x0 J/) /�.1�� G A � �. slrnn6. d Nowr Rtfiae OPTIONAL Thagh the n/omrallon Debw u not requred by law, R may p4vva v& able b persats TefywV w M dnawnerx and Could Pra✓enf baudiiant r val and reattachment of Ma rom9 to another obaxnant Description of Attached �- Document n Title or Type of Document: WV - +el�C. ZgAa. W Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: IL-55e 00 Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual • Corporate Officer Title(s): • Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General • Attorney -in -Fact • Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGHT THUM1IBPRINT OF SIGNER Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): • Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General • Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Other. Signer Is Representing RIGHT THI:L'ePRINT OF SIGNER S 0 1994 N.I,.nal N.I.N AYS.O. u • 9236 %em A. P O Boa 7104 • C..,. P.M. CA 91309 7194 P,o N. 5907 Nem tr Co Tdl -Frn 1 BOP 676 -WIF ATTACHMENT A TO CO. -.ANT REGARDING REAL PROPEn_1 PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -139 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 005'09" EAST, 524.35 FEET TO THE.TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 4 026'94" EAST, 328.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 °31'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 003'22" EAST, 500.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23,1991; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 71 007'30" EAST, 263.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 30.10 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 053'06" TO THE CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTERLINE IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 036'54" THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 015109" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 038'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33 °16'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 °34'36" WEST, 263.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 058'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 032'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84 005'09" WEST, 313.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. File u File uAI dala\4460surv\altach -a.wpd TM /04 /AG2- 125wp5 (1 -28 -91/1) 10e40 1 JAN 90 ATTACHMENT B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY PROJECT NO. TPM 98 -139 OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS No protest shall be made by the owners to any proceedings for the installation or acquisition of street improvements, including undergrounding of utility lines, under any special assessment proceedings, whether conducted pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 or the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, or any other applicable state or local law, and whether processed by the City of Encinitas or any other governmental entity-having jurisdiction in the matter and for the purposes of determining property owners support for same. Prior to close of escrow the developer shall require that the prospective property owners sign and return the following statement to the City of Encinitas Department of Planning and Community Development: "In purchasing the home on Lot , I am aware of and understand that I am agreeing not to oppose the formation of an assessment district to fund the installation of right -of -way improvements. TM /O4/AG2- 125wp5 (1 -28 -91/1) 10e40 1 JAN 90 I 1 WORDED AT THE REQUEL /F_t CHICAGO TITLE C.O. Recording Requested By: City of Encinitas THE �—. IHAL Of THIS DODKNT WAS RECORDED ON MAR 16, 2000 DMJNEHT R K 02000- 0135192 GREGORY J. SMITH, CO11,1TY RECORDER SAN DIEGO CMNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 4:34 PM When Recorded Mail To: ) Ln LS ) D City Clerk ) 2 City of Encinitas ) 1 505 S. Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RE&RDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND MINOR USE PERMIT Assessor's Parcel No. 264 - 091 -16, -17, and —19 Project No.: 98 -139 TPM/MIN 1 A. Jesse R. Oakley, Kevin K. Takabayashi and Suzanne M. Takabayashi ( "OWNER" hereinafter) are the owners of real property which is known as the Oakley Subdivision ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment A, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of the approval of permit 98 -139 TPM/MIN by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter) OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit as follows: See Attachment B, Notice of Decision No. DCD- 99 -07, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrances, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER'S duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. F. Failure of OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. ACCEPTED AN AGREED Dated I Dated l 0,0 Dated (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached.) CITY OF ENCINITAS Dated 4 114�'�t Bill Weedman, City Planner (Notarization not required) CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California ss. County of ORANGE On 1/28/00 —before me, NANCY H. WARNER, NOTARY PUBLIC Date JESSE R. O AK L E 1a— aao Taie of ORiwr (e 9 .'Jane Doe. Notary PuMcl personally appeared KEVIN K. TAKABAYASHI & SUZANNE TAKABAYASHI Name(s) of Sgner(s) ' X1 personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Place Notary Seat Apove g tore of Notary Pudic OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): _ ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited 7 General ❑ Attorney in Fact • Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Other: Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: RIGHT THur.iapmr4T Or SIGNER LN O 199] Naaotlel Notary Aseaciapon • 9360 N Soto Aw., PO. Boa 2402 • CNatswwm. CA 913132402 - -- — - PnA No 5 7 _ —_Reoa a C A TO -Free 1,900-876-6a27 Jo: 7333686 -U50 *TACHMENT A DESCRIPTION PARCEL "B" OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1997 - 0614690 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING: PARCEL B -1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 836.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84005'09" EAST, 524.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 4 °26'14" EAST, 328.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64 031'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16 003'22" EAST, 500.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 71 007'30" EAST, 263.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 30.10 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 053'06" TO THE CENTER LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTER LINE IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 °18'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 °050'40 "52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 °07'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7036'54 "; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10015'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4038'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33016'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54034'36" WEST, 263.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34058'36" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74032'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84005'09" WEST, 313.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. RESERVING THEREFROM A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF DESCRIBED IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE BELOW. PARCEL B -2: A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP N0. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS "EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON ". oESC.n - 12 /ap: n er No: 7333688 -U50 2 DESCRIPTION A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE. PARCEL B -3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS DESCRIPTION. PARCEL B -4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X "; THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 276.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52050'40 "; THENCE SOUTH 34 °58'36" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34058'38" EAST, 54.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67040'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 46.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8051'11 "; THENCE SOUTH 76031'46" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15007'27 "; THENCE NORTH 88020'470 WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Y "; THENCE NORTH 55001122" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH SS001'22" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211054'40" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE JEC[t - ,0nu.v,.. er No: 7333688 -U50 3 DESCRIPTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 °19'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 24 056'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16 °15'39" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 °30'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 °45'08" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 "58'05 "; THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINA13OVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4. PARCEL B -6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X "; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 019'54" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 °28'43 "; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 °15'45 "; THENCE SOUTH 58 "14'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESCRIBED AS POINT "Z" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 °57'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104 023'32 "; THENCE NORTH 77 °34'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1 040'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Z "; THENCE NORTH 31045'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31045'06" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 151.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180032'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL er No: 7333688 -U50 4 DESCRIPTION ANGLE OF 66 021'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 62 012'52" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88 °02'05" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °09'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 009'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32 054'39" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05 "; THENCE NORTH 31 °45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL 2-3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. EXCEPTING FROM THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -1. AIPTACHMENT B CITY OF ENCINITAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 505 So. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 (760) 633 -2710 AMEADKaNOTICE OF DECISION DCD 99 -07 February 22,1999 ji This letter is to inform you that the Director of Community Development has approved the application for: 98 -139 TPM/MIN/EIA (Oakley): Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Use Permit and Environmental Initial Assessment to create a four lot subdivision with a remainder parcel for a 11.37 + /- acre property located towards the southerly end of Wildflower Drive and southwest of Wildflower Estates. (Portions of APN 264 - 091 - 16,17,19). Project Description and Discussion: The proposed project is the subdivision of an 11.37 + /- acre parcel known as the "Oakley property". The project site is located in a semi - rural section of Olivenhain. The site consists of gently sloping topography that has historically been cleared and used for animal grazing and horse - related functions. The project area was part of Boundary Adjustment application involving 7 legal lots (97 -131 BA, Mayo, et a]) that was approved by the Community Development Department on July 18, 1997. The tentative parcel map and minor use permit would create lots with the following lot sizes: Parcel Lot Size /Gross Lot Area/Net Parcel 2.72/acres 2.70 /acres Parcel 2 2.05 /acres 1.95 /acres Parcel 3 3.1 Wacres 2.66 /acres Parcel 1.63 /acres 1.36 /acres Remainder 1.79 /acres 1.64 /acres The applicant has designed the project to utilize lot area averaging in order to create lots with usable pads outside the existing constraints, which include sloping topography and c AW139rPM.DW 1 the Escondido Sewer Outfall easement. The underlying zoning, which is Rural Residential, calls for minimum lot sizes of 2 acres. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 30.16.020 A(1), lot area averaging for subdivisions creating four (4) or fewer lots in a residential zone may be approved pursuant to a minor conditional use permit. This proposed subdivision yields an average lot size of 2.06 acres. The applicant will dedicate and improve a 10' -wide recreational Vail easement adjacent to Wildflower Valley Drive that will be consistent with the City's adopted Interim Recreational Trails Standards. An Environmental Initial Assessment and Negative Declaration has been prepared for the City of Encinitas by the environmental consulting firm of Englehom & Associates. According to the Initial Study, the project could not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Negative Declaration will be prepared. The applicant has submitted service availability letters indicating that all required services are available for the project site. A standard 300 ft. / 100 ft. radius public notification was issued, with minimal comments being received by the community. No letters of concern or objection were received by Planning staff. FINDINGS Tentative Parcel Map: This approval is subject to the following findings for Tentative Parcel Map. 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451 of the Subdivision Map Act since the project is in conformance with the General Plan designation (RR) for the site and no Specific Plan is applicable. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and any specific plans since the project is in conformance with the General Plan designation (RR) for the site. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the intended residential type of development because in terms of lot size, shape, setbacks and access the subdivision will adequately accommodate existing future development of single family dwellings. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development since the subdivision will conform to the density limitations of the RR Zone. aNv9ai397PM.DW K 5. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project consists of a minor subdivision within an urbanized area. No significant natural resources are present on the site. 6. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, since documentation has been obtained stating that necessary services and utilities shall be available for the site. 7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. A review of title information did not show any easements on or adjacent to the property, which would be adversely impacted by this application. 8. The subdivision conforms to all the provisions of the Municipal Code including project density, lot size and lot dimensions, as per the information submitted in the subject application. FINDINGS FOR A USE PERMIT STANDARD In accordance with Section 30.74.070 of the Municipal Code, a use permit application shall be approved unless findings of fact are made, based upon the information presented in the application or during the hearing, which support one or more of the following conclusions: The location, size, design or operating characteristics of the proposed project will be incompatible with or will adversely affect or will be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residences, buildings, structures or natural resources, with consideration given to, but not limited to: a. The inadequacy of public facilities, services and utilities to serve the proposed project; b. The unsuitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed; and C. The harmful effect, if any, upon environmental quality and natural resources of the city; Facts: The applicant is proposing a four -lot subdivision with a remainder parcel. As part of this application, the applicant proposes lot area averaging to create lots that are smaller arYu98139TPM.DCD than 2 acres in size. Pursuant to Section 30.16.020 of the Municipal Code, lot area averaging may be proposed and approved through the minor use permit process. Discussion: This proposal will create parcel sizes that range from 1.36 acres/net to 2.98 acres/net. The average lot size will be 2.06 acres which is greater than the 2 -acre minimum lot size for the RR zone. This proposal is compatible with the approved subdivision to the north (Wildflower Estates) which also utilized lot area averaging. Lot sizes in the Wildflower Estates subdivision were approved ranging from 1.5 acres to 2.1 acres. The grading of the parcels proposed for this development will be in substantial conformancewith similar estate type lots in the vicinity. Conclusion: The proposed project will be compatible with adjacent large -lot, custom - home developments and subdivisions. Public services will be available for this subdivision. Average lot size will be greater than the two acre minimum lot size required in the RR zone, which is ample area to site a single - family custom home and accessory structures. The pattern of future development will be consistent with adjacent land uses in terms of intensity, grading and density and no harmful effects on the environment or natural resources will occur from this project. 2. The impacts of the proposed project will adversely affect the policies of the Encinitas General Plan or the provisions of the Municipal Code; and 3. The project fails to comply with any other regulations, conditions, or policies imposed by the Municipal Code. Facts:. Pursuant to Chapter 30.16.020 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, a minor residential subdivision is permitted by right in the RR zone while lots designed for residential use may be smaller than that allowed by the underlying zoning with the approval of a minor use permit for lot area averaging. Discussion: The Community Development Department has conducted an analysis of the application and has not identified any significant adverse impacts that could result from the proposed use. A standard public notification was issued, and no negative comments were received by the community. The project has been designed around the policies of the General Plan and development regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance. The slope analysis presented with the application indicates areas of potential grading that are shown on the slope analysis as being in excess of 25% slope. A visual review of the contour lines on the tentative parcel map and a review of the site in the field indicates that the areas shown in excess of 25% are not excessively steep. Also, a slope analysis calculation sheet prepared and certified by the project engineer indicates that the 0M&98139TPM.DW 4 encroachment into the over 25% slope area is less than 10% which is consistent with Municipal Code Section 30.34.030B. Conclusion: Based on Community Development Department analysis, the project has been designed not to create any significant environmental impacts nor will the project adversely affect the policies of the Encinitas General Plan or the provisions of the Encinitas Municipal Code. Environmental Review: The City of Encinitas, having consulted with Englehom & Associates, has completed an Initial Study of this project in accordance with the City's CEQA Guidelines for the purpose of determining whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment. That Study has determined that the project could not have a significant effect on the environment, therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. This approval is subject to the following conditions: SCI SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: SC4 Approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and all associated permits will expire on February 22, 2001, at 5:00 PM, two years after the approval of this project, unless the conditions have been met or an extension of time has been approved pursuant to the Municipal Code. SC5 This project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application dated received by the City on June 3, 1998, and Tentative Parcel Map dated received by the City on December 30, 1998, consisting of I sheet, designated as approved by the Community Development Department on February 22, 1999, and shall not be altered without express authorization by the Community Development Department. SCA Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall cause the property to be annexed to the Cardiff Sanitation District to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. thefe��, p"Fsuant to Seetion 711.4 A4 uh. e 9-tAte Fish- And Game Code, the appheaHt m a Vkg8139TPM.DGD GI STANDARD CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): G5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Municipal Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived herein. G13 The applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, School Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Flood Control Mitigation Fees, Park Mitigation Fees, and Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees. Arrangements to pay these fees shall be made prior to Final Map approval/building permit issuance to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Engineering Services Departments. The applicant is advised to contact the Community Development Department regarding Park Mitigation Fees, the Engineering Services Department regarding Flood Control and Traffic Fees, applicable School District(s) regarding School Fees, the Fire Department regarding Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees, and the applicable Utility Departments or Districts regarding Water and/or Sewer Fees. M1 This approval may be appealed to the City Council within 10 calendar days from the date of this approval pursuant to Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code. M2 All project grading shall conform with the approved Tentative Map or Tentative Parcel Map. In cases where no grading is proposed at the time of the Tentative Map/Tentative Parcel Map, or in cases where the grading plan later submitted is not consistent with the approved Tentative Map/fentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall be required to obtain a design review permit for grading prior to issuance of grading permits. M4 The property owner /developer shall obtain design review permits through the City for homes to be constructed on the lots resulting from the approved map, as well as all related am"si397PM.DCD C • n. • GI STANDARD CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): G5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Municipal Code and all other applicable City regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived herein. G13 The applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, School Fees, Traffic Mitigation Fees, Flood Control Mitigation Fees, Park Mitigation Fees, and Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees. Arrangements to pay these fees shall be made prior to Final Map approval/building permit issuance to the satisfaction of the Community Development and Engineering Services Departments. The applicant is advised to contact the Community Development Department regarding Park Mitigation Fees, the Engineering Services Department regarding Flood Control and Traffic Fees, applicable School District(s) regarding School Fees, the Fire Department regarding Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees, and the applicable Utility Departments or Districts regarding Water and/or Sewer Fees. M1 This approval may be appealed to the City Council within 10 calendar days from the date of this approval pursuant to Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code. M2 All project grading shall conform with the approved Tentative Map or Tentative Parcel Map. In cases where no grading is proposed at the time of the Tentative Map/Tentative Parcel Map, or in cases where the grading plan later submitted is not consistent with the approved Tentative Map/fentative Parcel Map, the applicant shall be required to obtain a design review permit for grading prior to issuance of grading permits. M4 The property owner /developer shall obtain design review permits through the City for homes to be constructed on the lots resulting from the approved map, as well as all related am"si397PM.DCD C site improvements. If the property owner /developer elects to develop the lots resulting from the approved final map as custom homesites, the design review permit requirement may be waived by the Community Development Department pursuant to Section 23.08.030 (7) of the Municipal Code. The property owner /developer is advised to contact the Community Development Department at such time as development of the subject property is planned to determine whether a design review permit will be required. A standard covenant specifying this condition shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder to give constructive notice to future purchasers of the site. M6 Street names shall be approved by the City prior to the recordation of the final map, and street addresses shall be provided by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits. MT The applicant shall dedicate and improve a 10' -wide recreational trail easement commencing at a point approximately 40' easterly of the northwest comer of Parcel 4, then southerly for a distance of approximately 20', then westerly for a distance of approximately 295' to the subdivision boundary. Trail improvements shall meet the City's adopted Interim Recreational Trails Standards. Fl FIRE CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): F2 ACCESS ROADWAY DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus access roadways shall have an unobstructed paved width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. EXCEPTION: Access to one (1) single family residence shall not be less than 16 feet of paved width. F4 TURNAROUNDS: All dead -end fire access roadways in excess of 150 feet in length and serving more than four (4) dwelling units shall be provided with a cul-de -sac. The cul -de -sac radius for public streets shall comply with city road standards. Streets constructed to private road standards where a turnaround is required shall have a cul -de- sac with a paved radius of not less than 36 feet. Cul -de -sacs in commercial projects shall comply with City road standards. Alternate types of turnarounds may be considered by the Fire Chief as needed to accomplish the purpose of the Fire Code. F5 GRADE: The gradient for a fire apparatus roadway shall not exceed 20.0 %. Grades exceeding 15.0% (incline or decline) shall not be permitted without mitigation. Minimal mitigation shall be the installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems for structures accessed by such a roadway. cm M139TPM.DCO 7 F7 RESPONSE MAPS: Any development that by virtue of new structures necessitates fire hydrants, roadways, or similar features, shall be required to provide a map in a format compatible with current Department mapping services, and shall be charged a reasonable fee for updating all Fire Department response maps. F8 COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS: Prior to the delivery of combustible materials on the project site, water and sewer systems shall satisfactorily pass all required tests and be connected to the public water and sewer systems. In addition, the first lift of asphalt paving shall be in place to provide a permanent all- weather surface for emergency vehicles. Said access shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. F9 POSTING OF ROADWAYS: Emergency access roadways when required shall be properly identified as per Fire Department standards. F10 OBSTRUCTIONS (ACCESS ROADWAYS): All traffic lanes shall be a minimum of 24 feet in width during construction and shall be maintained clear and free of obstructions during construction in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. F11 FIRE HYDRANTS & FIRE FLOWS: The applicant shall provide fire hydrants of a type, number, and location satisfactory to the Encinitas Fire Department. A letter from the water agency serving the area shall be provided that states the required fire flow is available. Fire hydrants shall be of a bronze type. A two -sided blue reflective road marker shall be installed on the road surface to indicate the location of the fire hydrant for approaching fire apparatus. F12 FUEL MODIFICATION ZONES: The applicant shall provide and maintain fire /fuel breaks to the satisfaction of the Encinitas Fire Department. F13 ADDRESS NUMBERS: Address numbers shall be placed in a location that will allow them to be clearly visible from the street fronting the structure. The height of the address numbers shall conform to Fire Department Standards. F14 ADDRESS NUMBERS FOR STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF ROADWAY: Where structures are located off a roadway on long driveways, a monument marker shall be placed at the entrance where the driveway intersects the main roadway. Permanent address numbers with height conforming to Fire Department standards shall be affixed to this marker. F15A AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM - SINGLE - FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES: Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system en 4W139TAA(DW installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. E1 ENGINEERING CONDITIONS: CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): E2 All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of building/gradingpermit issuance shall apply. EGl Grading Conditions EG2 No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the final map. EG3 The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. EG5 No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. EG6 A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate grading permit issued for the borrow or disposal site if located within the city limits. EG7 All newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1. EG8 A soils/geological/hydraulic report (as applicable) shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Such report shall be submitted and approved Prior to final map approval/Prior to building permit issuance/At first submittal of a grading plan, as applicable. EG9 Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the Engineering Services Director for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the Engineering Services Director may impose with regards to the hauling operation. EG10 In accordance with Section 23.24.370 (A) of the Municipal Code, no grading permit shall be issued for work occurring between October 1 st of any year and April 15th of the cn✓y9si39TPM. DCD 7 following year, unless the plans for such work include details of protective measures, including desilting basins or other temporary drainage or control measures, or both, as may be deemed necessary by the field inspector to protect the adjoining public and private property from damage by erosion, flooding, or the deposition of mud or debris which may originate from the site or result from such grading operations. ED1 Drainage Conditions ED2 The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent any offsite siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control measures and shall construct temporary desiltation/detention basins of type, size and location as approved by the Engineering Services Director. The basins and erosion control measures shall be shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities, slope erosion control measures and other methods required or approved by the Engineering Services Director. The developer shall maintain the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a period of time satisfactory to the Engineering Services Director and shall guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types suitable to the Engineering Services Director. ED3 A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water originating within the subdivision, and all surface waters that may flow onto the subdivision from adjacent lands, shall be required. Said drainage system shall include any easements and structures as required by the Engineering Services Director to properly handle the drainage. ED5 The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the final map for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with the Master Drainage Plan and City of Encinitas Standards as required by the Engineering Services Director. ED6 The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless covenant regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map /any grading or building permit for this project. ED7 Concentrated flows across driveways and/or sidewalks shall not be permitted. ED8 The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from a 100 -year frequency storm under developed conditions is equal to or less than the runoff from a cnVW8139TPM.DCD 10 storm of the same frequency and duration under existing conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the desired results. ES1 Street Conditions ES2 A registered Civil Engineer or a licensed land surveyor shall provide a signed statement that: "The existing private roads of access to the project are within the easements for the benefit of the land division ". ES3 The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the Tentative Map /site development plan. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the Final Map /prior to issuance of any building permit for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. ES4 Reciprocal access and/or maintenance agreements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives or parking areas and maintenance thereof to the satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director. ES6 In accordance with Chapter 23.36 of the Municipal Code, the developer shall execute and record a covenant with the County Recorder agreeing not to oppose the formation of an assessment district to fund the installation of right -of -way improvements. ES8 The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the Engineering Services Director prior to approval of the Final Map /issuance of any grading or building permit for this project. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Encinitas Standards based on R -value tests. The standard improvement plan check deposit is required. ES9 Some improvements shown on the Tentative Map and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The subdivider shall conform to Municipal Code Section 24.16.070 regarding offsite improvements and acquisition of property interest. EU1 Utiliti es a7va8139TPM.DGD 11 EU2 The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective utility agencies regarding services to the project. EU3 The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G. & E., Pacific Telephone, and other applicable authorities. EU4 All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including existing utilities unless exempt by the Municipal Code. EU5 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation and undergrounding of existing public utilities, as required. EU7 The design of the division of land shall provide each cable operator an opportunity to construct, install and maintain, on land identified on the map as dedicated to public utility use, any equipment necessary to extend cable television services to each residential parcel in the subdivision. This conditions shall not apply to the conversion of existing dwelling units to condominiums, community apartments, or stock cooperatives. EU8 Subject to all applicable Federal and State laws, statutes and regulations, in the event of multiple cable communication operators desiring to serve new residential developments in which the electric power and telephone utilities are underground, the following procedure shall apply with respect to access to and utilization of underground easements: (a) The developer shall be responsible for contacting and surveying all franchised cable operators to ascertain which operators desire to provide cable television service to the development. The developer may establish a reasonable deadline to receive responses from cable operators. The final tract map shall indicate the cable operator(s) that have agreed to serve the development. (b) If one or more cable operators wish to provide service, they shall be accommodated in the joint utilities trench on a nondiscriminatory shared basis. (c) The developer shall provide at least (10) working days notice of the date that the utility trenches will be open to the cable operators that have agreed to serve the development. (d) Sharing the joint utilities trench shall be subject to compliance with Public Utilities Commission and utility standards. If such compliance is not possible, or if three (3) or more operators desire to provide service to the an4198139TWOM 12 development, the developer shall provide a separate trench for the cable television cables, with the entire cost shared among the participating cable operators. With the concurrence of the developer, the affected utilities and the cable television operators, alternative installation procedures, such as the use of deeper trenches, may be utilized, subject to the applicable law. (e) Any cable operator wishing to serve an area where the trenches have been closed shall be responsible for separate trenching and associated costs; provided that if the cable operator was not provided timely written notice of the availability of such trenches, the developer shall reimburse the operator for such costs. EMI Mal) EM3 This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) phase EM4 This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No building permit shall be issued for the remainder parcel until it is reviewed and approved pursuant to the provisions of Title 24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. This note shall be placed on the final map. In accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code Chapter 1. 12, this decision may be appealed to the City Council within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this determination. The appeal must be filed, accompanied by a $100.00 filing fee, prior to 4:00 PM on the 10th calendar day following the date of this notice of decision. This notice constitutes a decision of the Community Development Department only. Additional permits, including Building Permits, may be required by the Building Department or other City Departments. It is the property owner or applicant's responsibility to obtain all necessary permits required for the type of project proposed. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact Chris Miller at the Community Development Department by telephoning (760) 633 -2718. Sandra Hol er Community Development Director cm/P98139rPM.DCD 13 P DOC # 2)000- 0098315 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) FED 20 . 2000 1:05 PI l ) SS: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE 1, Bart J. Hartman, certify that I GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER am the duly qualified and elected FEES: 6.00 Treasurer -Tax Collector of the FILED County of San Diego, State of California; That I have examined the records in my office as to delinquent taxes and assessments collected by the County of San Diego on the property in the subdivision or parcel map known as: CITY OF ENCINITAS TPM 98 -139 A final map of which subdivision or parcel map is about to be filed with the appropriate legislative body in the County of San Diego for approval; and I hereby certify that at the date hereof there are NO liens against said subdivision or parcel map, or any part thereof for unpaid State, County, Municipal or local taxes and special assessments for the fiscal year 99/2000. I further certify that there are against the parcel or parcels of real property within which the subdivision or parcel map is situated liens for State, County and local taxes and special assessments collected as taxes which are a lien but which are not yet payable and which I estimate as follows: State, County, School and Special District Taxes $7,236.00 Include city of ENCINITAS In WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9TH day of FEB Certificate No. 98 -071 THIS CERTIFICATE VOID BEGINNING: SEPTEMBER 20, 2000 Parcel No. 264- 091 -58 -00 BART J. HARTMAN TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR -X ) BY: ,.t 0j -L2nL) (Deputy) Subject to Government Code Section 66493 Tax Surety/Bond Required Yes ® No ❑ This certificate must be filed with the County Recorder and a Conformed copy delivered to the appropriate legislative body in the County of San Diego. NAD83 Zone 6 Coordinates Only Units= U.S. Survey Feet Station Name: FORTY Northing: Easting: Elevation: 1964096.774 6266572.408 339.930 * * * MAPPING ANGLE= - OD 31' 45.22" * * * COMBINED FACTOR= 0.99995521 * * Point Scale Factor= .9999661346305247 Ellipsoidal Reduction Factor= .9999890710569435 RM F-F, R:Ci S-PVIC 12- 7 -99 Page OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD MAP CHECK #2 - SET INVERSE SET #83 NAD83_TIES FROM BEARING /ANGLE 28 SW 42 14'02" 29 NE 10 45'31" 32 SE 05 57'46" 33 SW 18 03'22" 34 SW 84 31'11" 35 SW 04 26'14" CLOSURE: 35 1964739.0388 6266883.3456 28 NE 42 54'35" 1 PART IN 596872 DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST 28 1964411.0918 6266857.9032 424.79 29 1964096.5742 6266572.3769 2749.37 32 1966797.6167 6267085.6064 1571.11 33 1965235.0070 6267248.8170 500.43 34 1964759.2215 6267093.7096 211.33 35 1964739.0388 6266883.3456 328.94 28 1964411.0847 6266857.8966 .01 28 1964411.0918 6266857.9032 ERROR: -.0071 -.0066 1 ELEV PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 5785.9797 672417.697 15.437 9- 9-99 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD MAP CHECK #2 - SET INVERSE See SET X21 PCL_B -GROSS P-,� w%tp FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EN ENCINRTISFS 186 323966.8018 70 186 NE 04 26'14" 328.94 183 324294.7559 705476.3126 183 NE 84 31'11" 211.33 184 324314.9386 705686.6766 184 NE 18 03'22" 500.43 304 324790.7241 705841.7840 304 SE 71 07'30" 263.33 257 324705.5356 706090.9539 PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 257 SE 71 34'03" 30.10 510 324696.0170 706119.5137 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 00 53'06" 30.10 256 326549.7300 706721.4680 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 18 52'30" 1949.00 SW 17 59'24" 02 56'23" .06 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SE 71 07'30" 15.05 SE 72 00'36" .0581 WARNING: 06 26107" curve not tangent to back tangent PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 510 SW 14 42'40" 38.54 699 324658.7407 706109.7267 CL EC WILDFLOWER DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 06 18'44" 38.56 509 324766.1248 705776.6072 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NW 78 26'42" 350.00 SE 72 07'58" 16 22'13" .53 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SW 11 33'18" 19.30 SW 17 52'02" .5317 699 SW 17 52'02" 16.24 300 324643.2840 706104.7441 300 SE 72 07'58" 144.98 310 324598.8024 706242.7317 ANG PT PCL B PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 310 SE 75 56'25" 53.12 309 324585.8968 706294.2639 ANG PT PCL B DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 07 36154" 53.16 236 324979.5103 706365.4571 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 17 52'02" 400.00 SW 10 15'08" 14 19'26" .88 Page 1 9- 9 -99 Page 2 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD 1 PART IN 197431 TAN LENGTH 26.62 61.16 178.72 260.16 263.59 78.97 403.33 313.65 TANGENT PC *PI SE 79 44'52" SE 72 07'58" 309 SW 10 15'09" 238 SW 04 38'28" 239 SE 33 16'30" 240 SW 54 34'36" 308 NW 34 58'38" 307 SW 74 32'31" 247 NW 84 05'09" CLOSURE: 324085.4549 706121.1760 186 SW 18 39'44" 1 PART IN 197431 TAN LENGTH 26.62 61.16 178.72 260.16 263.59 78.97 403.33 313.65 02 186 ERROR: PERIMETER 3146.6724 SET #73 OAKLEY -PCL 1 GROSS EXTERNAL .8848 706283.3782 706268.9172 706411.6561 706196.8588 706151.5892 705762.8493 705450.8687 323966.8018 705450.8636 .0151 .0051 AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 495679.437 11.379 FROM TANGENT PI *PT DISTANCE SE 79 44'52" 238 324525.7133 239 324347.5793 240 324130.0734 308 323977.2932 ANG PT PCL B 307 324041.9996 ANG PT PCL B 247 323934.4989 186 323966.8169 02 186 ERROR: PERIMETER 3146.6724 SET #73 OAKLEY -PCL 1 GROSS EXTERNAL .8848 706283.3782 706268.9172 706411.6561 706196.8588 706151.5892 705762.8493 705450.8687 323966.8018 705450.8636 .0151 .0051 AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 495679.437 11.379 FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 183 324294.7549 705476.3126 183 NE 84 31'11" 211.33 184 324314.9376 705686.6766 184 SE 18 01'54" 337.33 380 323994.1754 705791.0946 380 NE 74 32'31" 342.47 381 324085.4549 706121.1760 381 SE 34 58'38" 53.05 307 324041.9868 706151.5870 ANG PT PCL B 307 SW 74 32'31" 403.33 247 323934.4861 705762.8471 247 NW 84 05'09" 313.65 186 323966.8041 705450.8665 186 NE 04 26'14" 328.94 183 324294.7582 705476.3155 CLOSURE: 183 SW 41 18'31" 0.00 183 324294.7549 705476.3126 ERROR: .0033 .0029 1 PART IN 452997 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 1990.1044 118645.340 2.724 SET #74 OAKLEY -PCL 2 GROSS FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 184 324314.9370 705686.6738 184 SE 86 31129" 333.81 382 324294.7022 706019.8699 WARNING: 80 17'00" curve not tangent to back tangent PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 382 SE 20 36134" 148.89 298 324155.3423 706072.2780 CL BC 9- 9 -99 Page 3 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD DELTA - 28 44'09" 1 PART IN 209336 ARC RADIAL PC *RP EAST NE 83 45'31" 706318.0916 TANGENT RD PC *PI 2.044 SE 06 14'29" 298 SE 34 58'38" 381 SW 74 32'31" 380 NW 18 01'54" CLOSURE: 85.30 381 324085.4492 184 NW 31 17'35" 1 PART IN 209336 ARC RP NORTH EAST 150.46 243 324327.3181 706318.0916 1249.3763 RD PT 2.044 RADIUS OAKLEY -PCL 3 RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE 300.00 SW 55 01'22" 19 05'55" TAN LENGTH DISTANCE TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL 76.85 ELEV SE 34 58'38" 9.6863 85.30 381 324085.4492 706121.1763 342.47 380 323994.1697 705791.0949 337.33 184 324314.9319 705686.6769 .01 184 324314.9370 705686.6738 ERROR: -.0051 .0031 ELEV MID ORD 9.38 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 1249.3763 89031.286 2.044 SET y75 OAKLEY -PCL 3 GROSS FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 304 324790.7179 705841.7794 304 SE 71 07'30" 263.33 257 324705.5294 706090.9493 PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 257 SE 71 34'03" 30.10 510 324696.0108 706119.5091 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 00 53'06" 30.10 256 326549.7238 706721.4634 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 18 52'30" 1949.00 SW 17 59'24" 02 56'23" .06 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SE 71 07'30" 15.05 SE 72 00'36" .0581 WARNING: 06 26'07" curve not tangent to back tangent PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 510 SW 14 42'40" 38.54 699 324658.7345 706109.7221 CL EC WILDFLOWER DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 06 18'44" 38.56 284 324766.1186 705776.6026 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NW 78 26'42" 350.00 SE 72 07'58" 16 22'13" .53 9- 9 -99 Page 4 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SW 11 33'18" 19.30 SW 17 52'02" .5317 699 SW 17 52'02" 251.50 299 324419.3643 706032.5588 CL EC PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 299 SW O5 48'46" 125.30 382 324294.7040 706019.8680 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 24 06'32" 126.23 243 324327.3203 706318.0897 RD PT RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD SE 72 07'58" 300.00 SW 83 45'30" 19 05'55" 6.62 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SW 17 52'02" 64.07 SE 06 14'30" 6.7643 WARNING: 80 16159" line not tangent to curve 382 NW 86 31'29" 333.81 184 324314.9388 705686.6719 184 NE 18 03122" 500.43 304 324790.7243 705841.7793 CLOSURE: 304 SE 00 53'43" .01 304 324790.7179 705841.7794 ERROR: .0064 -.0001 1 PART IN 241215 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 1543.9740 137310.106 3.152 SET #76 OAKLEY- PCL_4_GROSS FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 300 324643.2743 706104.7375 300 SE 72 07'58" 144.98 310 324598.7927 706242.7251 ANG PT PCL B PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 310 SE 75 56'25" 53.12 309 324585.8871 706294.2573 ANG PT PCL B DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 07 36'54" 53.16 236 324979.5006 706365.4505 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 17 52'02" 400.00 SW 10 15'08" 14 19'26" .88 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SE 72 07158" 26.62 SE 79 44152" .8848 309 SW 10 15'09" 61.16 238 324525.7036 706283.3716 9- 9 -99 Page 5 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD 238 SW 04 38'28" 178.72 239 324347.5696 706268.9106 239 SW 69 23'52" 258.89 383 324256.4719 706026.5777 WARNING: 06 56134" curve not tangent to back tangent PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 383 NE 02 06114" 163.00 299 324419.3621 706032.5619 CL EC DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 31 31'37" 165.07 243 324327.3174 706318.0926 RD PT RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 76 20'26" 300.00 NW 72 07'57" 19 05'55" 11.28 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL NW 13 39'34" 84.68 NE 17 52103" 11.7235 299 NE 17 52'02" 235.26 300 324643.2755 706104.7425 CLOSURE: 300 SW 76 30'15" .01 300 324643.2743 706104.7375 ERROR: .0012 .0050 1 PART IN 213389 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 1097.2525 72234.822 1.658 SET #77 OAKLEY - REMAINDER GROSS FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 383 324256.4731 706026.5732 383 NE 69 23'52" 258.89 239 324347.5708 706268.9061 239 SE 33 16'30" 260.16 240 324130.0649 706411.6450 240 SW 54 34'36" 263.59 308 323977.2847 706196.8477 ANG PT PCL B 308 NW 34 58'38" 217.31 298 324155.3442 706072.2746 CL BC PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 298 NW 24 19'06" 110.98 383 324256.4743 706026.5735 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 21 19'04" 111.62 243 324327.3197 706318.0884 RD PT RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 55 01'22" 300.00 SW 76 20'26" 19 05'55" 5.18 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL NW 34 58'38" 56.46 NW 13 39'34" 5.2672 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP COORDINATE FILE CLOSURE: 383 SW 14 02'10" 1 PART IN 898650 SET #78 OAKLEY- PCL_1_NET 0.00 383 ERROR: PERIMETER 1111.5708 Page 6 SDE 4460 4460.CRD 324256.4731 706026.5732 .0012 .0003 AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 78461.527 1.801 FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 183 324294.7549 705476.3126 183 NE 84 31'11" 211.33 184 324314.9376 705686.6766 184 SE 18 01'54" 337.33 380 323994.1754 705791.0946 380 NE 74 32'31" 321.25 384 324079.7991 706100.7236 384 SE 34 58'38" 53.05 214 324036.3310 706131.1346 214 SW 74 32'31" 382.11 247 323934.4861 705762.8471 247 NW 84 05'09" 313.65 186 323966.8041, 705450.8665 186 NE 04 26'14" 328.94 183 324294.7582 705476.3155 CLOSURE: 183 SW 41 18'31" 0.00 183 324294.7549 705476.3126 ERROR: .0033 .0029 1 PART IN 443337 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 1947.6644 117584.313 2.699 SET #79 OAKLEY -PCL 2 NET FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 184 324314.9370 705686.6738 184 SE 86 31'29" 313.53 385 324295.9315 705999.6272 WARNING: 80 53'45" curve not tangent to back tangent PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 385 SE 20 18'11" 162.13 292 324143.8784 706055.8826 RW BC DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 29 20'54" 163.91 243 324327.3186 706318.0842 RD PT RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 84 22'16" 320.00 SW 55 01122" 17 54'18" 10.44 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SE 05 37'44" 83.80 SE 34 58'38" 10.7897 292 SE 34 58'38" 78.21 384 324079.7947 706100.7165 384 SW 74 32'31" 321.25 380 323994.1710 705791.0875 380 NW 18 01'54" 337.33 184 324314.9332 705686.6695 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD CLOSURE: 184 NE 48 31'56" .01 184 324314.9370 705686.6738 ERROR: -.0038 -.0043 1 PART IN 211595 Page 7 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 1214.2376 84252.083 1.934 SET #80 OAKLEY- PCL_3_NET FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 304 324790.7179 705841.7794 304 SE 71 07'30" 263.33 257 324705.5294 706090.9493 PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 257 SE 71 11150" 4.91 390 324703.9457 706095.6006 DELTA ARC RP NORTH - EAST ELEV - 00 08'40" 4.91 256 326549.7238 706721.4634 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 18 52'30" 1949.00 SW 18 43'50" 02 56'23" 0.00 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SE 71 07'30" 2.46 SE 71 16'10" .0015 WARNING: 07 42107" curve not tangent to back tangent PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 390 SW 14 26153" 38.77 389 324666.4040 706085.9280 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 06 50'19" 38.79 284 324766.1184 705776.6029 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NW 78 58'17" 325.00 SE 72 07'58" 17 37'46" .58 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SW 11 01'43" 19.42 SW 17 52'02" .5796 389 SW 17 52'02" 16.24 388 324650.9473 706080.9454 388 SE 72 07'58" 5.00 387 324649.4132 706085.7043 387 SW 17 52'02" 235.26 291 324425.4998 706013.5237 RW EC PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 291 SW 06 07'09" 130.31 385 324295.9328 705999.6330 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 23 29'46" 131.23 243 324327.3195 706318.0900 RD PT 9- 9 -99 Page 8 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD SE 72 07'58" 320.00 SW 84 22'16" 17 54'18" 6.70 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SW 17 52'02" 66.55 SE 05 37'44" 6.8467 WARNING: 80 53145" line not tangent to curve 385 NW 86 31129" 313.53 184 324314.9383 705686.6796 184 NE 18 03122" 500.43 304 324790.7238 705841.7870 CLOSURE: 304 SW 52 10'38" .01 304 324790.7179 705841.7794 ERROR: .0059 .0076 1 PART IN 156810 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 1508.7309 128654.583 2.954 SET x/81 OAKLEY-PCL_4_NET FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 237 324566.2066 706290.6961 237 SW 10 15'09" 41.16 238 324525.7038 706283.3702 238 SW 04 38128" 178.72 239 324347.5698 706268.9092 239 SW 69 23152" 238.73 386 324263.5660 706045.4470 WARNING: 07 26129" curve not tangent to back tangent PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 386 NE 02 21'12" 149.79 244 324413.2266 706051.5973 RW EC DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 31 01'42" 151.63 243 324327.3182 706318.0927 RD PT RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 76 50'21" 280.00 NW 72 07'57" 20 27'46" 10.20 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL NW 13 09'39" 77.73 NE 17 52'03" 10.5878 244 NE 17 52'02" 195.26 245 324599.0692 706111.5054 BC RETURN PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 245 NE 62 52'02" 28.28 252 324611.9683 706136.6771 EC RETURN DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 90 00'00" 31.42 250 324592.9329 706130.5408 RP RETURN 9- 9 -99 Page 9 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD SE 72 07'58" 20.00 NE 17 52'02" 286 28'44" 5.86 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL NE 17 52'02" 20.00 SE 72 07'58" 8.2843 252 SE 72 07'58" 104.98 235 324579.7592 706236.5939 PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 235 SE 75 56'25" 55.78 237 324566.2084 706290.7027 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 07 36'54" 55.82 236 324979.5025 706365.4556 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 17 52'02" 420.00 SW 10 15'08" 13 38'31" .93 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SE 72 07'58" 27.95 SE 79 44'52" .9291 CLOSURE: 237 SW 74 44'42" .01 237 324566.2066 706290.6961 ERROR: .0018 .0066 1 PART IN 145843 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 997.7266 60687.567 1.393 SET #82 OAKLEY- REMAINDER NET FROM HEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 239 324347.5717 706268.9093 239 SE 33 16'30" 260.16 240 324130.0658 706411.6482 240 SW 54 34136" 243.59 218 323988.8779 706213.1487 218 NW 34 58'38" 217.16 242 324166.8145 706088.6616 RW BC PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 242 NW 24 04'09" 105.97 386 324263.5728 706045.4422 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 21 48'59" 106.62 243 324327.3249 706318.0878 RD PT RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 55 01'22" 280.00 SW 76 50'21" 20 27'46" 5.06 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL NW 34 58'38" 53.96 NW 13 09'39" 5.1522 WARNING: 07 26129" line not tangent to curve OAKLEY PARCEL MAP COORDINATE 386 NE 69 23'52" 238.73 CLOSURE: 239 SE 45 00'00" .01 ERRO] 1 PART IN 153868 SET #83 SET #84 PCl_B- 1_road FROM BEARING /ANGLE 214 NW 34 58'38" 384 NE 74 32'31" 381 SE 34 58'38" 307 SW 74 32'31" CLOSURE: 324041.9838 706151.5829 706100.7197 214 NE 00 00'00" SET #85 Pcl_B- 2_road Page 10 SDE 4460 FILE : 4460.CRD 239 324347.5766 706268.9044 239 324347.5717 706268.9093 1: .0049 -.0049 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 1066.2618 71936.372 1.651 DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 214 324036.3280 706131.1305 53.05 384 324079.7961 706100.7195 324085.4508 21.22 381 324085.4519 706121.1719 SW 74 32'31" 53.05 307 324041.9838 706151.5829 706100.7197 ANG PT PCL B NW 34 58'38" 78.21 21.22 214 324036.3280 706131.1305 0.00 214 324036.3280 706131.1305 RW ERROR: 0.0000 0.0000 PC PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 148.5401 1061.026 .024 FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 381 324085.4508 706121.1721 381 SW 74 32'31" 21.22 384 324079.7950 706100.7197 384 NW 34 58'38" 78.21 292 324143.8787 706055.8858 RW BC PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 292 NW 20 18'11" 162.13 385 324295.9318 705999.6303 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 29 20'54" 163.91 243 324327.3192 706318.0872 RD PT RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 55 01'22" 320.00 SW 84 22'16" 17 54'18" 10.44 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL NW 34 58'38" 83.80 NW 05 37'44" 10.7897 WARNING: 80 53'45" line not tangent to curve 385 SE 86 31'29" 20.27 382 324294.7031 706019.8630 WARNING: 80 17100" curve not tangent to back tangent 9- 9 -99 Page 11 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD PC 382 CHORD BRG SE 20 36'34" DELTA - 28 44'09" RADIAL PC *RP NE 83 45'31" TANGENT PC *PI SE 06 14'29" 298 SE 34 58'38" CLOSURE: 381 NE 75 27'56" 1 PART IN 186204 LENGTH PT NORTH EAST 148.89 298 324155.3432 706072.2711 519.3752 CL BC SET #86 ARC RP NORTH EAST 150.46 243 324327.3190 706318.0847 DISTANCE RD PT EAST RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE 300.00 324696.0105 SW 55 01'22" 19 05'55" TAN LENGTH CHORD BRG TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL 76.85 EAST SE 34 58'38" 9.6863 85.30 381 324085.4501 706121.1694 0.00 381 324085.4508 706121.1721 ERROR: -.0007 -.0027 ELEV ELEV MID ORD 9.38 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 519.3752 4778.281 .110 SET #86 Pcl B -3 road FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 510 324696.0105 706119.5082 PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 510 SW 14 42'40" 38.54 699 324658.7342 706109.7212 CL EC WILDFLOWER DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 06 18'44" 38.56 284 324766.1183 705776.6017 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NW 78 26'42" 350.00 SE 72 07'58" 16 22'13" .53 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SW 11 33'18" 19.30 SW 17 52'02" .5317 699 SW 17 52'02" 251.50 299 324419.3640 706032.5579 CL EC PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 299 SW 05 48'46" 125.30 382 324294.7037 706019.8671 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 24 06'32" 126.23 243 324327.3200 706318.0888 RD PT 9- 9 -99 Page 12 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD SE 72 07'58" 300.00 SW 83 45'30" 19 05'55" 6.62 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SW 17 52'02" 64.07 SE 06 14'30" 6.7643 WARNING: 80 16'59" line not tangent to curve 382 NW 86 31'29" 20.27 385 324295.9324 705999.6344 WARNING: 09 06115" curve not tangent to back tangent PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 385 NE 06 07109" 130.31 291 324425.4994 706013.5250 RW EC DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 23 29'46" 131.23 243 324327.3195 706318.0914 RD PT RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 84 22116" 320.00 NW 72 07'58" 17 54'18" 6.70 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL NW 05 37'44" 66.55 NE 17 52102" 6.8467 291 NE 17 52'02" 235.26 387 324649.4128 706085.7056 387 NW 72 07'58" 5.00 388 324650.9469 706080.9468 388 NE 17 52102" 16.24 389 324666.4036 706085.9294 PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 389 NE 14 26'53" 38.77 390 324703.9453 706095.6020 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 06 50'19" 38.79 284 324766.1180 705776.6043 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NW 72 07'58" 325.00 SE 78 58'17" 17 37'46" .58 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL NE 17 52'02" 19.42 NE 11 01'43" .5796 WARNING: 07 42107" curve not tangent to back tangent PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 390 SE 71 38'22" 25.19 510 324696.0103 706119.5105 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 00 44'26" 25.19 256 326549.7228 706721.4666 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 18 43'51" 1949.00 SW 17 59125" 02 56'23" .04 9- 9 -99 Page 13 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SE 71 16'09" 12.60 SE 72 00'35" .0407 CLOSURE: 510 NW 85 01'49" 0.00 510 324696.0105 706119.5082 ERROR: -.0002 .0023 1 PART IN 384753 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 888.2741 8650.893 .199 SET #87 Pcl_B-4_road FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV 300 324643.2743 706104.7375 300 SE 72 07'58" 144.98 310 324598.7927 706242.7251 ANG PT PCL B PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 310 SE 75 56125" 53.12 309 324585.8871 706294.2573 ANG PT PCL B DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 07 36'54" 53.16 236 324979.5006 706365.4505 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 17 52102" 400.00 SW 10 15108" 14 19126" .88 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SE 72 07158" 26.62 SE 79 44152" .8848 309 SW 10 15109" 20.00 237 324566.2064 706290.6976 PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 237 NW 75 56'24" 55.78 235 324579.7574 706236.5889 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 07 36'54" 55.82 236 324979.5003 706365.4514 RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 10 15'09" 420.00 SW 17 52'03" 13 38131" .93 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL NW 79 44'51" 27.95 NW 72 07'57" .9291 235 NW 72 07158" 104.98 252 324611.9665 706136.6721 EC RETURN PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 252 SW 62 52102" 28.28 245 324599.0674 706111.5004 BC RETURN 9- 9 -99 Page 14 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD ELEV MID ORD 5.86 ELEV ELEV MID ORD 10.20 Sex #� ELEV MID ORD 11.28 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST - 90 00'00" 31.42 250 324592.9311 706130.5358 RP RETURN RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE SW 17 52'02" 20.00 NW 72 07'58" 286 28'44" TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL NW 72 07'58" 20.00 SW 17 52'02" 8.2843 245 SW 17 52'02" 195.26 244 324413.2248 706051.5923 RW EC PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST 244 SW 02 21'11" 149.79 386 324263.5642 706045.4423 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST - 31 01'42" 151.63 243 324327.3170 •706318.0878 RD PT RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE SE 72 07'58" 280.00 SW 76 50'20" 20 27'46" TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SW 17 52'02" 77.73 SE 13 09'40" 10.5878 WARNING: 07 26'28" line not tangent to curve 386 SW 69 23152" 20.16 383 324256.4703 706026.5716 WARNING: 06 56134" curve not tangent to back tangent PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST 383 NE 02 06114" 163.00 299 324419.3605 706032.5558 CL EC DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST 31 31137" 165.07 243 324327.3158 706318.0865 RD PT RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE NE 76 20126" 300.00 NW 72 07157" 19 05155" TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL NW 13 39134" 84.68 NE 17 52103" 11.7235 299 NE 17 52102" 235.26 300 324643.2739 706104.7364 CLOSURE: 300 NE 70 01101" 0.00 300 324643.2743 706104.7375 ERROR: -.0004 -.0011 1 PART IN 1.006217E+6 ELEV MID ORD 5.86 ELEV ELEV MID ORD 10.20 Sex #� ELEV MID ORD 11.28 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 9- 9 -99 Page 15 OAKLEY PARCEL MAP SDE 4460 COORDINATE FILE : 4460.CRD 1177.7483 11547.956 .265 SET #88 Pcl_B-Remainder_ road FROM BEARING /ANGLE DISTANCE TO NORTH EAST ELEV ANG PT PCL B 308 323977.2815 706196.8491 308 NW 34 58'38" 217.31 298 324155.3410 706072.2760 CL BC PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 298 NW 24 19'06" 110.98 383 324256.4711 706026.5749 DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV 21 19'04" 111.62 243 324327.3165 706318.0898 RD PT RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 55 01122" 300.00 SW 76 20126" 19 05155" 5.18 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL NW 34 58138" 56.46 NW 13 39134" 5.2672 WARNING: 06 56'34" line not tangent to curve 383 NE 69 23152" 20.16 386 324263.5650 706045.4456 WARNING: 07 26129" curve not tangent to back tangent PC CHORD BRG LENGTH PT NORTH EAST ELEV 386 SE 24 04'09" 105.97 242 324166.8067 706088.6651 RW BC DELTA ARC RP NORTH EAST ELEV - 21 48159" 106.62 243 324327.3172 706318.0913 RD PT RADIAL PC *RP RADIUS RADIAL RP *PT DEG OF CURVE MID ORD NE 76 50121" 280.00 SW 55 01'22" 20 27'46" 5.06 TANGENT PC *PI TAN LENGTH TANGENT PI *PT EXTERNAL SE 13 09'39" 53.96 SE 34 58'38" 5.1522 242 SE 34 58'38" 217.16 218 323988.8701 706213.1522 218 SW 54 34'36" 20.00 308 323977.2778 706196.8544 ANG PT PCL B CLOSURE: 308 NW 55 04'50" .01 308 323977.2815 706196.8491 ERROR: -.0037 .0053 1 PART IN 107192 PERIMETER AREA (sq ft) AREA (acres) 692.8711 6527.632 .150 �o CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY Reference: REMAINDER PARCEL PM 18461 PREL I:i1 Dated as of: November 15, 2000 at 7:30 AM Order No.: 203066738 - U50 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception in Schedule B or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in the attached list. Copies of the Policy forms are available upon request. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to in Schedule B and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in the attached list of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY Title Department: Visit Us On The Web: westerndiv/sion. at com OCHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 925 "B" STREET SAN DIEGO, CA. 92101 (619)544 -6233 fax: (619)544 -6279 TOM VOTEL / KEN CYR TITLE OFFICER PFP -09/05199bk SCHEDULE A Order Yo: 203066738 U50 Your Ref: REMAINDER PARCEL PM 18461 1. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: A FEE AS TO PARCEL Bl; AN EASEMENT MORE FULLY DESCRIBED BELOW AS TO PARCEL B2 -B11 2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: JESSE R. OAKLEY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE JESSE R. OAKLEY TRUST, AS TO THE REMAINDER OF PARCEL MAP 18461 3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of SAN DIEGO and is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION VRFm Page 1 DESCRIPTION Order No. 203066738 PARCEL B -1: (APN: 264- 091 -58) THE "REMAINDER PARCEL" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18461, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY APRIL 24, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000 - 209873 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS RESERVING THEREFROM A NON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF DESCRIBED IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE BELOW. PARCEL B -2: A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP NO. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS "EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON ". A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE. PARCEL B -3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS DESCRIPTION. PARCEL B -4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X "; THENCE SOUTH 17052'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 276.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 050'40 "; THENCE SOUTH 34 058'38" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34 °58'38" Page 2 DESCRIPTION Order No. 203066738 EAST, 54.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 °40'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 46.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 °51'11 "; THENCE SOUTH 76 °31146" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 007'27 "; THENCE NORTH 88 020'47" WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Y "; THENCE NORTH 55 001'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 55 °01'22" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 958'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211 °54'40" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 °19'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 24 056'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16 °15'39" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 030'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 045'08" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05 "; THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4. PARCEL B -6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X "; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 019'54" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 028'43 "; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 015'45 "; THENCE SOUTH 58 014'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESCRIBED AS POINT "Z" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58 014'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 057'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104 °23'32 "; THENCE NORTH 77 °34'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 Page 3 DESCRIPTION Order No. 203066738 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1 °40'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF, THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Z "; THENCE NORTH 31 °45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31 045'06" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 151.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180 032'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66 °21'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 62 °12'52" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88 °02'05" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 009'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °09'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32 054'39" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53958'05 "; THENCE NORTH 31 045'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. EXCEPTING FROM THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS B -3 THROUGH 2-9 INCLUSIVE THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -1. PARCEL B -10: AS EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE TEMPORARY TURNAROUND ROAD OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS THAT Page 4 DESCRIPTION Order No. 203066738 PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL C -1 DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS FILE NO. 97- 614690, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 74 032'31" WEST, 21.22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL "B -4" DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS FILE NO. 97- 614690, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 34 058'38" EAST, 17.69 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST 44.72 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 30.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, A RADIAL THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 06 °49'59" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 50.46 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 96 022'46" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B -11 AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS, PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES OVER THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS 2, 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18461, DESIGNATED AS "PROPOSED 40' PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT (WILDFLOWER DRIVE AND WILDFLOWER VALLEY DRIVE - PRIVATE STREET), IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY APRIL 24, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000- 209873 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS SCHEDULE B Page 1 Order NO: 203066738 U50 Your Ref: REMAINDER PARCEL PM 18461 At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in the policy form designated on the face page of this Report would be as follows: A 1. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL OR ESCAPED ASSESSMENTS OF PROPERTY TAXES, IF ANY, MADE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 0.5, CHAPTER 3.5 OR PART 2, CHAPTER 3, ARTICLES 3 AND 4 RESPECTIVELY (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75) OF THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS A RESULT OF THE TRANSFER OF TITLE TO THE VESTEE NAMED IN SCHEDULE A; OR AS A RESULT OF CHANGES IN OWNERSHIP OR NEW CONSTRUCTION OCCURRING PRIOR TO DATE OF POLICY. B 2. EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS, PIPELINES, DRAINAGE AND /OR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES THERETO OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE EASEMENT PARCEL(S) HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED AND /OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS DEEDS OF RECORD. AFFECTS: PARCELS B -2 THROUGH B -11 _ 3. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE PERFORMANCE UNDER AN AGREEMENT REFERRED TO THEREIN DATED: NOT SET FORTH TRUSTOR: M & B ASSOCIATES, a California Limited Partnership TRUSTEE: TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82- 272624, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LAND AND OTHER LAND. D 4. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE PERFORMANCE UNDER AN AGREEMENT REFERRED TO THEREIN DATED: JULY 14, 1962 TRUSTOR: M & B ASSOCIATES, a California Limited Partnership TRUSTEE: TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: ENCINITAS UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED: NOVEMBER 4, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82- 341140, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LAND AND OTHER LAND. PREB - 10/31/97bx Page 2 Order No: 203066738 U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) Your Ref: REMAINDER PARCEL PM 18461 E 5. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES, INGRESS AND EGRESS RECORDED: FEBRUARY 22, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83- 055102, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. F 6. AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN DATED: JANUARY 20, 1986 BY AND BETWEEN: ANDERSON BROTHERS, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (GRANTOR), AND TERRAL INVESTMENT COMPANY, A California Corporation, AND INVESTORS LEASING CORPORATION, A California Corporation, AND M & B ASSOCIATES, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND AL F. MAYO AND MANSOUR HEIDARI, AND AL F. MAY AND JESSE R. OAKLEY AND ROGER Q. MC FARLAND AND PHILIP G. DE CARION AND DUANE WHITE AND FRANK B. CARR AND WILLIAM M. BARTON RECORDED: FEBRUARY 21, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 070006, OFFICIAL RECORDS REGARDING: SEWER EASEMENT REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. a 7. AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN DATED: JANUARY 20, 1986 BY AND BETWEEN: ROBERT LEE ISAACS AND ROWENA JUIN ISAACS AND THOMAS GRAYSON (COLLECTIVELY, GRANTOR), AND TERRAL INVESTMENT COMPANY, A California Corporation, AND INVESTORS LEASING CORPORATION, A California Corporation, AND M & B ASSOCIATES, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND AL F. MAYO AND MANSOUR HEIDARI, AND AL F. MAYO AND JESSE R. OAKLEY AND ROGER Q. MC FARLAND AND PHILIP G. DE CARION AND DUANE WHITE AND FRANK B. CARR AND WILLIAM M. BARTON (COLLECTIVELY, TERRAL) RECORDED: JULY 3, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 276592, OFFICIAL RECORDS REGARDING: SEWER EASEMENT REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. E 8. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SCHEDULE B Page 3 (continued) Order No: 203066738 U50 Your Ref: REMAINDER PARCEL PM 18461 RESERVED IN A DOCUMENT (NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE AS TO THE PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF SAID EASEMENT) PURPOSE: FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY RECORDED: APRIL 3, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998- 0187785 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. SAID EASEMENT HAS BEEN CONVEYED AND /OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD. z 9. A PENDING ASSESSMENT FOR THE DISTRICT SHOWN BELOW. WHEN NOTICE OF THE ASSESSMENT IS RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER THE ASSESSMENT SHALL BECOME A LIEN ON SAID LAND. DISTRICT: OLIVENHAIN WATER STORAGE PROJECT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 96 -1 (FY 1999 UPDATE) DISCLOSED BY: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM AMENDMENT RECORDED: JUNE 2, 1999 AS DOCUMENT NO. 99- 380290 OFFICIAL RECORDS NOTICE OF AMENDED ASSESSMENT RECORDED JUNE 2, 1999 AS DOCUMENT NO. 99- 380291 OFFICIAL RECORDS. J 10. A COVENANT AND AGREEMENT UPON AND SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN EXECUTED BY: JESSE R. OAKLEY, ET AL IN FAVOR OF: THE CITY OF ENCINITAS RECORDED: DECEMBER 17, 1999 AS FILE NO. 1999 - 0817933 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. K 11. A COVENANT AND AGREEMENT UPON AND SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN EXECUTED BY: JESSE R. OAKLEY, ET AL IN FAVOR OF: THE CITY OF ENCINITAS RECORDED: DECEMBER 17, 1999 AS FILE NO. 1999 - 0817934 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS SCHEDULE B Page 4 (continued) Order No: 203066738 U50 Your Ref: REMAINDER PARCEL PM 18461 REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. L 12. A COVENANT AND AGREEMENT UPON AND SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN EXECUTED BY: JESSE R. OAKLEY, ET AL IN FAVOR OF: THE CITY OF ENCINITAS RECORDED: DECEMBER 17, 1999 AS FILE NO. 1999- 0817964 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. n 13. A COVENANT AND AGREEMENT UPON AND SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN EXECUTED BY: JESSE R. OAKLEY, ET AL IN FAVOR OF: THE CITY OF ENCINITAS RECORDED: MARCH 16, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000- 0135192 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. M 14. A DOCUMENT ENTITLED "PRIVATE ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR TPM 98- 139 ", DATED OCTOBER 21, 1999 EXECUTED BY JESSE R. OAKLEY, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 67.2232% INTEREST, AND KEVIN K. TAKABAYASHI AND SUZANNE M. TAKABAYASHI, AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 32.7768% INTEREST; AND THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN CONTAINED, RECORDED MARCH 30, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000- 0160593 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 0 15. A COVENANT AND AGREEMENT UPON AND SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN EXECUTED BY: JESSE R. OAKLEY, ET AL IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF ENCINITAS RECORDED: MARCH 30, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000 - 0160596 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. r 16. A COVENANT AND AGREEMENT UPON AND SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN EXECUTED BY: JESSE R. OAKLEY, ET AL IN FAVOR OF: THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT RECORDED: MARCH 30, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000- 0160597 OF OFFICIAL PREUMB 9/23/9]EM Page s SCHEDULE B (continued) Order No: 203066738 USO Your Ref: REMAINDER PARCEL PM 18461 RECORDS REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. Q 17. PROVISIONS, HEREIN RECITED, OF THE DEDICATION STATEMENT ON THE MAP OF: PARCEL MAP NO. 18461 PROVISIONS: THE SUBDIVIDER AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF ENCINITAS AND ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES FROM ANY CLAIM, ACTION OR PROCEEDING AGAINST THE CITY OF ENCINITAS OR ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES TO ATTACK, SET ASIDE VOID OR ANNUL AN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY OF ENCINITAS CONCERNING THE SUBDIVISION WHEN SUCH ACTION IS BROUGHT WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED IN GOV. CODE SECTION 66499.37. THIS CERTIFICATE IS CONDITIONED UPON THE CITY OF ENCINITAS PROVIDING PROMPT NOTICE TO THE SUBDIVIDER AS PROVIDED BY THE ACT. THE PARCELS SHOWN ON THIS RECORDED DOCUMENT WERE CREATED VIA A LOT AVERAGING PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ENCINITAS MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 30.16.020 A(1) AND CANNOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED UNLESS THE ZONING DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS IS CHANGED TO PERMIT PARCELS UNDER 2 ACRES IN NET AREA. NO BUILDING PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR THE REMAINDER PARCEL UNTIL IT IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 24 OF THE ENCINITAS MUNICIPAL CODE. R 18. EASEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SHOWN OR AS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION ON THE RECORDED MAP SHOWN BELOW. MAP OF: PARCEL MAP NO. 18461 EASEMENT PURPOSE: PROPOSED TEMPORARY PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES, EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID EASEMENT TO REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE REQUIRED STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR CITY OF ENCINITAS TPM 99 -014 ARE COMPLETED. AFFECTS: AS SHOWN THEREON EASEMENT PURPOSE: PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE AFFECTS: AS SHOWN THEREON Page 6 Order No: 203066738 U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) Your Ref: REMAINDER PARCEL PM 18461 EASEMENT PURPOSE: PROPOSED 40' PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY AFFECTS: AS SHOWN THEREON EASEMENT PURPOSE: WATER EASEMENT TO OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT AFFECTS: AS SHOWN THEREON EASEMENT PURPOSE: SEWER EASEMENT TO THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT AFFECTS: AS SHOWN THEREON s 19. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: CORNUCOPIA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION PURPOSE: INGRESS, EGRESS, PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES RECORDED: OCTOBER 13, 2000 AS FILE NO. 2000 - 0553008, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. r SAID EASEMENT HAS BEEN CONVEYED AND /OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD. U 20. ANY INVALIDITY OR DEFECT IN THE TITLE OF THE VESTEES IN THE EVENT THAT THE TRUST REFERRED TO IN THE VESTING PORTION OF SCHEDULE A IS INVALID OR FAILS TO GRANT SUFFICIENT POWERS TO THE TRUSTEE(S) OR IN THE EVENT THERE IS A LACK OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THE TRUST INSTRUMENT. v 21. MATTERS WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY AN INSPECTION OR SURVEY OF SAID LAND OR BY INQUIRY OF THE PARTIES IN POSSESSION THEREOF. w END OF SCHEDULE B x NOTE NO. 1: IF TITLE IS TO BE INSURED IN THE TRUSTEE (S) OF A TRUST, (OR IF THEIR ACT IS TO BE INSURED), THIS COMPANY WILL REQUIRE A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL TRUST AGREEMENT INCLUDING ALL EXHIBITS LISTING REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY TRANSFERRED INTO THE TRUST TOGETHER WITH COMPLETE COPIES OF ANY AMENDMENTS OR MODIFICATIONS THERETO. THE COMPANY MUST ALSO BE FURNISHED WITH A VERIFICATION OF ALL PRESENT TRUSTEES STATING THAT THE COPY BEING FURNISHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ENTIRE TRUST AGREEMENT INCLUDING ALL MODIFICATIONS OR AMENDMENTS; THAT THE TRUST IS CURRENTLY IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT; AND THAT IT HAS NOT BEEN REVOKED OR TERMINATED. PREUMUC B /ZJ /Mbk Page 7 Order No: 203066738 U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) Your Ref: REMAINDER PARCEL PM 18461 r NOTE N0, 2: PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR SHOWN BELOW ARE PAID. FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES THE AMOUNTS ARE: FISCAL YEAR: 2000 -2001 1ST INSTALLMENT: $2,960.16 2ND INSTALLMENT: $2,960.16 EXEMPTION: $NONE CODE AREA: 19377 ASSESSMENT NO: 264 - 091 -58 z JO 19 � 27 Y � f PAR R � i s.'POYn1 265 25 SHT 2 7 I Ac E 29 SHT 2 xe.0 3 c w i.n D N62 Z- 6 2 ..................... FPM 2 � �,OYi.wMe� k �r/A 2.52 AC Ir •��' i.l..... PAR e I PAR q n Y Y gam( 371.% xe.0 3 c w i.n D N62 Z- �p a pRGO Cp Wry ApExtpt'f MA' =� �� ~.o•tY�ny,,�� tb.r�wW �! P J O M I[1M�R•l ,R.� J_ i pp�! \J 0 e b: 8r G 9 9a c'7 ! Imo" s��^1C„p D 3. i.l..... �p a pRGO Cp Wry ApExtpt'f MA' =� �� ~.o•tY�ny,,�� tb.r�wW �! P J O M I[1M�R•l ,R.� J_ i pp�! \J 0 e b: 8r G 9 9a c'7 ! Imo" s��^1C„p D CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Services Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, Ca. 92024 -3633 Phone (760) 633 -2770 Fax (760) 633 -2818 TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Chicago Title Company Date: April 21, 2000 925 "B" Street Job. No. TPM 98 -139 San Diego, Ca. 92101 Ref No. 7333688 -U50 (Oakley) Tom Vote[ - Title Officer (619) 544 -6238 RE: Recordation of Oakley / Takabayashi Parcel Map Number 98 -139 Enclosed: • Original Mylars of the parcel map, sheets 1 through 3. Please send the City of Encinitas a conforming copy of the Final Parcel Map. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2793. Thank you. From: Blair A. Knoll, P.E.,L.S. Associate Civil Engineer c: File RECORDING REOUESTED MICAGO TITLE COMI AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO (--JESSE R. OAKLEY 2450 WHITE RD. IRVINE. CA. 92614 T}" 'SINk OF THIS DOCUMENT ;ORDER ON JAN 1-, 2000 DOLuMENT HINER 2000-0019559 GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY REUDER'S OFFICE TIME: 9:04 AM D L J Escrow No. _ Order No. 264 - 090 -59 SPAar: GRANT DEED FEB 12000 1� If THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(S) DECIARE(S) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAXIS $NONE -- EASEMENT ONLY unincorporated area ❑ Cityor &I computed on the full value of the interest or property conveyed, or is ❑ computed on the full value less the value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale, and FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, ALVIN F. MAYO AND NANNETTE MAYO, TRUSTEES OF THE MAYO FAMILY TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 19, 1990 hereby GRANT(S) to JESSE R. OAKLEY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 67.2232% INTEREST, AND KEVIN K. TAKABAYASHI AND SUZANNE M. TAKABAYASHI, AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 32.7768% INTEREST the following described real property in the County of SAN DIEGO , State of California: A PRIVATE TEMPORARY TURNAROUND ROAD EASEMENT OVER AND ACORSS THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED. A Dated STATE OF ORNLA COUNTY • '_ a Notary Public In and for said County and State, personally appeared AL4 A)F_7rE_m personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same In his / her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. r � F? 7 NESS my hand and official steal. �t -iQ J�. W A.LA_ ,iignafurb of Notary • Date y C-orriniission Expires FOR r+arAry Sex OR STAMP MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO PARTY SHOWN ON FOLLOWING UNE: IF NO PARTY SO SHOWN, MAIL AS DIRECTED ABOVE Name Street Address City, State & Zip GCO -0e /W /e1CY SDE 4460.00 NOVEMBER G4,1999 FILE:u:11 da talsurveys14460survW460temp.doc EXHIBIT'A' A PRIVATE TEMPORARY TURNAROUND ROAD EASEMENT OVER AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL "C -1" DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1997- 0614690 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 74 °32'31" WEST, 21.22 FEETTO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL "C-4" DESCRIBED IN SAID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL "C-4" SOUTH 34 058'38" EAST, 17.69 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST 44.72 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 30.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, A RADIAL THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 06 049'59" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 50.46 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 96 °22'46" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES, EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID EASEMENT. SAID EASEMENT TO TERMINATE UPON THE COMPLETION OF THE REQUIRED STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR CITY OF ENCINITAS TPM 99 -014. Uil DATA\SURV EYSW460SURV41460TEMP. WPD ROS 14039 PARCEL WXDFLOWER DRIVE PARCEL 3 EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT �M�,� �vocl�vl,�lS �P Ipa, as'1a3 I / EXISTING PRIVATE I ROAD AN9' UTILITY EASEMENT (PARCEL 4 PARCEL ' C -4' PARCEL 2 T.P.O.B. PRIVATE TEMPORARY` TURNAROUND ROAD EASEMENT PARCEL 'C-11 I PROJECT, CITY OF ENCINITAS T.P.M. 88-138 REMAINDER PARCEL P.O.B. I �C EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT 7PA1 99 -014 PLAT SCALE- r- W PRIVATE TE WPORARY njWAR0(W ROAD EASEUWr IBM AM B GMEERM M joa ma � aft ENQNEE 0 - PLAI 1 DATE DIEC &g? 99 AW Lgm BLAIYEYm OCHICAGO TITLE COMPANY FIFTH AMENDED Reference: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ PRELIMINARY REPORT Dated as of: December 2, 1999 at 7:30 AM Order No.: 7333688 - U50 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception in Schedule B or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in the attached list. Copies of the Policy forms are available upon request. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to In Schedule B and the exceptions and exclusions set forth In the attached list of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY Title Department: Visit Us On The Web: westerndivision. ctt. com OCHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 925 "B "STREET SAN DIEGO, CA. 92101 (619)544 -6234 fax: (619)544-6279 TOM VOTEL TITLE OFFICER PFP - 08105199bk o r ;�oTN� FEB 12000 ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS SCHEDULE A Order No: 7333688 U50 Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ L The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: A FEE AS TO PARCEL BI AN EASEMENT MORE FULLY DESCRIBED BELOW AS TO PARCELS B2 THROUGH B10 2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: JESSE R. OAKLEY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 67.2232% INTEREST, AND KEVIN K. TAKABAYASHI AND SUZANNE M. TAKABAYASHI, AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 32.7768% INTEREST AS TO PARCELS B -1 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE ALVIN F. MAYO AND NANETTE MAYO, TRUSTEES OF THE MAYO FAMILY TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 19, 1990, AS TO PARCEL B -10 3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of SAN DIEGO and is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION Page 1 DESCRIPTION Order No. 7333688 PARCEL "B" OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1997 - 0614690 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING: PARCEL B -1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 005'09" EAST, 524.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 4 026'14" EAST, 328.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 031'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 003'22" EAST, 500.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 71 007'30" EAST, 263.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 30.10 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 053'06" TO THE CENTER LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTER LINE IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 °18'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 170050'40 "52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 036'54 "; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 015'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 °38'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33 016'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 °34'36" WEST, 263.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 058'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 032'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84 005'09" WEST, 313.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. RESERVING THEREFROM A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF DESCRIBED IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE BELOW. PARCEL B -2: A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP NO. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS "EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON ". A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT Page 2 DESCRIPTION Order No. 7333688 SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE. PARCEL B -3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS DESCRIPTION. PARCEL B -4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X "; THENCE SOUTH 17052'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 276.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52050'40 "; THENCE SOUTH 34058'38" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34058'38" EAST, 54.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67040'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 46.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8051'11 "; THENCE SOUTH 76031'46" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15007'27 "; THENCE NORTH 88020'47" WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Y "; THENCE NORTH 55001'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 55001'22" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211054'40" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50019'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 24056'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16015'39" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58030'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE Page 3 DESCRIPTION Order No. 7333688 ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3045'08" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53058'05 "; THENCE NORTH 55001.22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4. PARCEL B -6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X "; THENCE SOUTH 72007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10019'54" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49028'43 "; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25015'45 "; THENCE SOUTH 58014'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESCRIBED AS POINT "Z" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58014'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1057'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104023'32 "; THENCE NORTH 77034'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1040'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Z "; THENCE NORTH 31045'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31045'06" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 151.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180032'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66021'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 62012'52" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88002'05" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39009'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39009'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32054'39" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53058'05 "; THENCE NORTH 31045'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF Page 4 DESCRIPTION Order No. 7333688 BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. EXCEPTING FROM THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -1. PARCEL B -10: AS EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE TEMPORARY TURNAROUND ROAD OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL C -1 DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS FILE NO. 97- 614690, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 74 032'31" WEST, 21.22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL "B -4" DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS FILE NO. 97- 614690, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 34 058'38" EAST, 17.69 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 34 058'38" EAST 44.72 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 30.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, A RADIAL THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 06 °49'59" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 50.46 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 96022'46" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SCHEDULE B Page 1 Ofder No: 7333688 U50 Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in the policy form designated on the face page of this Report would be as follows: AM 1. PROPERTY TAXES, INCLUDING ANY PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES AND ANY ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED WITH TAXES. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999 -2000. 1ST INSTALLMENT: PENALTY: 2ND INSTALLMENT: PENALTY AND COST: HOMEOWNERS EXEMPTION: CODE AREA: ASSESSMENT NO: $2,907.35 $290.73 (DUE AFTER DECEMBER 10) $2,907.35 $300.73 (DUE AFTER APRIL 10) NONE 19073 264 - 091 -58 A 2. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL OR ESCAPED ASSESSMENTS OF PROPERTY TAXES, IF ANY, MADE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 0.5, CHAPTER 3.5 OR PART 2, CHAPTER 3, ARTICLES 3 AND 4 RESPECTIVELY (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75) OF THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS A RESULT OF THE TRANSFER OF TITLE TO THE VESTEE NAMED IN SCHEDULE A; OR AS A RESULT OF CHANGES IN OWNERSHIP OR NEW CONSTRUCTION OCCURRING PRIOR TO DATE OF POLICY. c 3. EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS, PIPELINES, DRAINAGE AND /OR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES THERETO OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE EASEMENT PARCEL(S) HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED AND /OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS DEEDS OF RECORD. AFFECTS: PARCELS B -2 THROUGH B -10 nx 4. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, CONDEMNED BY FINAL DECREE PURPOSE: SEWER CASE NO: 3058N RECORDED: JANUARY 9, 1975 AS DOCUMENT NO. 75- 005919 OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. D 5. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE PERFORMANCE UNDER AN AGREEMENT REFERRED TO THEREIN DATED: NOT SET FORTH TRUSTOR: M & B ASSOCIATES, a California Limited Partnership TRUSTEE: TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA PREB 10 /91 /97bh Page 2 Order No: 7333688 U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82- 272624, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LAND AND OTHER LAND. E 6. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE PERFORMANCE UNDER AN AGREEMENT REFERRED TO THEREIN DATED: JULY 14, 1982 TRUSTOR: M & B ASSOCIATES, a California Limited Partnership TRUSTEE: TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: ENCINITAS UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED: NOVEMBER 4, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82- 341140, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LAND AND OTHER LAND. F 7. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES, INGRESS AND EGRESS RECORDED: FEBRUARY 22, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83- 055102, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. H 8. AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN DATED: JANUARY 20, 1986 BY AND BETWEEN: ANDERSON BROTHERS, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (GRANTOR), AND TERRAL INVESTMENT COMPANY, A California Corporation, AND INVESTORS LEASING CORPORATION, A California Corporation, AND M & B ASSOCIATES, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND AL F. MAYO AND MANSOUR HEIDARI, AND AL F. MAY AND JESSE R. OAKLEY AND ROGER Q. MC FARLAND AND PHILIP G. DE CARION AND DUANE WHITE AND FRANK B. CARR AND WILLIAM M. BARTON Page 3 Order No: 7333688 U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ RECORDED: FEBRUARY 21, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 070006, OFFICIAL RECORDS REGARDING: SEWER EASEMENT REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. r 9. AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN DATED: JANUARY 20, 1986 BY AND BETWEEN: ROBERT LEE ISAACS AND ROWENA JUIN ISAACS AND THOMAS GRAYSON (COLLECTIVELY, GRANTOR), AND TERRAL INVESTMENT COMPANY, A California Corporation, AND INVESTORS LEASING CORPORATION, A California Corporation, AND M & B ASSOCIATES, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND AL F. MAYO AND MANSOUR HEIDARI, AND AL F. MAYO AND JESSE R. OAKLEY AND ROGER Q. MC FARLAND AND PHILIP G. DE CARSON AND DUANE WHITE AND FRANK B. CARR AND WILLIAM M. BARTON (COLLECTIVELY, TERRAL) RECORDED: JULY 3, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 276592, OFFICIAL RECORDS REGARDING: SEWER EASEMENT REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. nJ 10. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS RESERVED IN A DOCUMENT (NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE AS TO THE PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF SAID EASEMENT) PURPOSE: FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY RECORDED: APRIL 3, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0187785 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. SAID EASEMENT HAS BEEN CONVEYED AND /OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD. .__ 11. A PENDING ASSESSMENT FOR THE DISTRICT SHOWN BELOW. WHEN NOTICE OF THE ASSESSMENT IS RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER THE ASSESSMENT SHALL BECOME A LIEN ON SAID LAND. DISTRICT: OLIVENHAIN WATER STORAGE PROJECT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 96 -1 (FY 1999 UPDATE) DISCLOSED BY: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM AMENDMENT RECORDED: JUNE 2, 1999 AS DOCUMENT NO. 99- 380290 OFFICIAL RECORDS PFEUM8C- 9 /M /Mbk Page 4 Order No: 7333688 U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ NOTICE OF AMENDED ASSESSMENT RECORDED JUNE 2, 1999 AS DOCUMENT NO. 99- 380291 OFFICIAL RECORDS. a END OF SCHEDULE B AC NOTE: IF THIS COMPANY IS REQUESTED TO DISBURSE FUNDS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS TRANSACTION, CHAPTER 598, STATUTES OF 1989 MANDATES HOLD PERIODS FOR CHECKS DEPOSITED TO ESCROW OR SUB- ESCROW ACCOUNTS. THE MANDATORY HOLD PERIOD FOR CASHIER'S CHECKS, CERTIFIED CHECKS AND TELLER'S CHECKS IS ONE BUSINESS DAY AFTER THE DAY DEPOSITED. OTHER CHECKS REQUIRE A HOLD PERIOD FROM THREE TO SEVEN BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE DAY DEPOSITED. nn w i z, pia,,. NOTE: ANY FUNDING WIRES TO CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY ARE TO BE DIRECTED AS FOLLOWS: BANK OF AMERICA 1850 GATEWAY BOULEVARD CONCORD, CALIFORNIA ABA 121- 000358 CREDIT TO CHICAGO TITLE SUB- ESCROW DEPOSITORY ACCOUNT NO. 12359 -50752 FURTHER CREDIT TO ORDER NO: 007333688 ATTN: TOM VOTEL JTF IAMD /AT 2AMEND /JRS 3AMEND /SRS 4AMEND /JRS TITLE OFFICER Order No: '7333688 - U50 Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ As part of the settlement of a class action lawsuit, we are required to place this notification in all preliminary reports: IF YOU BOUGHT, SOLD OR REFINANCED A HOME (RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY) IN CALIFORNIA BETWEEN JULY 1, 1989 AND FEBRUARY 28, 1997, PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING: Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement in a class action lawsuit filed in the Superior Court for Los Angeles County, a settlement agreement has been entered into that provides persons who bought, sold or refinanced residential real property in the State of California between July 1, 1989 and February 28, 1997, with certain rights. If you are such a person and you are now engaged in an escrow transaction with Chicago Title Company, Gateway Title Company, Benefit Land Title Company or Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, you have the following rights: If one of these companies previously handled a residential escrow transaction for you that involved residential real property in which a mortgage, promissory note, or similar debt instrument, repayment of which was secured by a duly recorded deed of trust, was fully paid, satisfied or discharged and a reconveyance of that deed of trust was executed and was delivered to one of those title companies for recording but was inadvertently not recorded, you have the right to request that a release of obligation or reconveyance be recorded in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. To obtain this right you must: (1) Establish to the satisfaction of the title company that you actually closed an escrow between July 1, 1989 and February 28, 1997, which was handled by one of the above - listed title insurance companies, in which a mortgage, promissory note, or similar debt instrument secured by a duly recorded deed of trust was fully paid, satisfied or discharged and a reconveyance of that deed of trust was executed and was delivered for recordation to the title company that handled the prior transaction. Proof of said transaction shall be made by presenting a closing statement, preliminary report, title insurance policy or a paid escrow invoice which identifies you and the prior deed of trust; and (2) Request in writing the recording of a reconveyance or release of obligation in the event that one inadvertently had not been previously recorded in the escrow transaction previously handled by one of the above -named title companies. M - /M/� PARCEL MAP GUARANTEE Guarantee No. 7333688 U50 Fee: Dated: DECEMBER 2, 1999 at 7:30 AM Map No. Subdivision: :M 0 � ��1�:1�71M r M �� ,f�Y1��7:�►r�7 •��Z�7u 1"�._�l!`� a corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES The County of SAN DIEGO and any City within which said subdivision is located in a sum not exceeding that, according to those public records which, under the recording law, impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the land included within the exterior boundary shown on the map of the above referenced subdivision, the only parties having any record title interest in said land whose signatures are necessary, under the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, on the certificates consenting to the recordation of said map and offering for dedication any streets, roads, avenues, and other easements offered for dedication by said map are set forth in Schedule A. Issuing Office: 925 "B" STREET SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 PHONE NO. (619) 239 -6081 PAX NO. (619) 544 -6277 �'T / � r MG - f 0/29/66M �cG TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Qlr� John Rau President By: Thomas J. Adams Secretary Order-No: 7333688 - U50 Dated: December 2, 19 °_ at7:30 A.M. .pNo: Subdivision: Fax Number: (619)544 -6292 SCHEDULE A The map hereinbefore referred to is a subdivision of: SEE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION The parties hereinbefore referred to are: OWNERS: JESSE R. OAKLEY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 67.2232$ INTEREST, AND KEVIN K. TAKABAYASHI AND SUZANNE M. TAKABAYASHI, AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 32.7768% INTEREST TRUST DEED HLDERS: TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE UNDER DEEDS OF TRUST RECORDED SEPTEMBER 2, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82- 272624 AND NOVEMBER 4, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82- 341140, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OU&I 1 tma=Mi)me)2OZ&Z (1) THE SIGNATURE OF THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO, OWNER OF AN EASEMENT AS CONDEMNED BY FINAL DECREE, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH RECORDED JANUARY 9, 1975 AS FILE NO. 75- 005919 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY HAS BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436, SUBSECTION (A)(3)(A)(I) OF GOVERNMENT CODE, THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY. (2) THE SIGNATURE OF SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, OWNER OF AN EASEMENT AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 22, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83- 055102 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY HAS BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436, SUBSECTION (A)(3)(A)(I) OF GOVERNMENT CODE, THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT SUBUrvn - U /u /M Page 1. DESCRIPTION Order No. 7333688 PARCEL "B" OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1997- 0614690 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING: PARCEL B -1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 005'09" EAST, 524.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 4 °26'14" EAST, 328.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 031'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 003'22" EAST, 500.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 71 °07'30" EAST, 263.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 30.10 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 °53'06" TO THE CENTER LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTER LINE IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 °26'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 170050'40 "52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 °36'54 "; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 015'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 °38'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33 016'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 °34'36" WEST, 263.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34058'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74032'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84005'09" WEST, 313.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. RESERVING THEREFROM A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF DESCRIBED IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE BELOW. PARCEL B -2: A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP NO. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS "EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON ". A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT Page 2 DESCRIPTION Order No.' 7333688 SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE. PARCEL B -3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 °26'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS DESCRIPTION. PARCEL B -4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X "; THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 276.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 050'40 "; THENCE SOUTH 34 058'38" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 54.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67040'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 46.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 051'11 "; THENCE SOUTH 76 031'46" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 007'27 "; THENCE NORTH 88 020'47" WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Y "; THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 55 °01'22" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211 °54'40" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 019'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 24 °56'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16 015'39" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 030'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE Page 3 Order No. 7333668 ALONG THE ARC OF SAID BEGINNING OF A REVERS THE ARC OF SAID CURVE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, DESCRIPTION CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 045'08" TO THE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05 "; THENCE 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4. PARCEL B -6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X "; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 019'54" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 028'43 "; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 015'45 "; THENCE SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESCRIBED AS POINT "Z" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 °57'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104 °23'32 "; THENCE NORTH 77 °34'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1 040'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Z "; THENCE NORTH 31 °45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31 045'06" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 151.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180 032'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66 °21'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 62 °12'52" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88 002'05" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 009'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39009'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32054'39" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53058'05 "; THENCE NORTH 31045'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF Page 4 DESCRIPTION Order No. - 7333688 BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. EXCEPTING FROM THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -1. PARCEL B -10: AS EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE TEMPORARY TURNAROUND ROAD OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF PARCEL C -1 DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS FILE NO. 97- 614690, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 74 °32'31" WEST, 21.22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL "B -4" DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS FILE NO. 97- 614690, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 34 058'38" EAST, 17.69 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST 44.72 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 30.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, A RADIAL THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 06 °49'59" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 50.46 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 96 °22'46" TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Policy No. Page 1 IWA011:)YY (3) THE SIGNATURES OF ROGER Q. McFARLAND, ET AL, OWNERS OF AN EASEMENT AS DISCLOSED BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 3, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0187785 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY HAVE BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436, SUBSECTION (A)(3)(A)(I) OF GOVERNMENT CODE, THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE TITLE AND SAID SIGNATURE IS NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY. F HIHM - u /u /M C� CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY FOURTH AMENDED Reference: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ PRELIMINARY REPORT Dated as of: September 21, 1999 at 7:30 AM Order No.: 7333688 - U50 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception in Schedule B or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in the attached list. Copies of the Policy forms are available upon request. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to In Schedule B and the exceptions and exclusions set forth In the attached list of this report carefully. The exceptions and excluslons are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report Is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY Title Department: Visit Us On The Web westerndivision, ctt. com 0 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 925 "B" STREET SAN DIEGO, CA. 92101 (619)544 -6234 fax: (619)544-6279 TOM VOTEL TITLE OFFICER PFP _Wg /Wbl f. - 5199 V ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS SCHEDULE A Order No: 7333688 U50 Vnur RrfF DnDror n 11 0111 n11 1. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: A FEE AS TO PARCEL B1 AN EASEMENT MORE FULLY DESCRIBED BELOW AS TO PARCELS B2 THROUGH B9 2. Title to said estate or interest at the dale hereof is vested in: JESSE R. OAKLEY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 67.2232% INTEREST, AND KEVIN K. TAKABAYASHI AND SUZANNE M. TAKABAYASHI, AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 32.7768% INTEREST 3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the Stale of California, County of SAN DIEGO and is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION Page 1 DESCRIPTION Order No. 7333688 PARCEL "B" OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1997- 0614690 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. BEING: PARCEL B -1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 °05'09" EAST, 524.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 4 °26'14" EAST, 328.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 031'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1B 003'22" EAST, 500.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 71 °07'30" EAST, 263.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 30.10 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 053'06" TO THE CENTER LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTER LINE IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 7B °26'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 °18'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 170050'40 "52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7036'54 "; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 °15'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 °38'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33 °16'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 °34'36" WEST, 263.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 058'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 °32'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84 005'09" WEST, 313.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. RESERVING THEREFROM A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF DESCRIBED IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE BELOW. PARCEL B -2: A NON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP NO. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS "EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON ". A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT Page 2 DESCRIPTION Order No. 7333688 SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE. PARCEL B -3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS DESCRIPTION. PARCEL B -4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X "; THENCE SOUTH 17052'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 276.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52050'40 "; THENCE SOUTH 34058'38" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34058'38" EAST, 54.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67040'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 46.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8051'11 "; THENCE SOUTH 76031'46" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15007'27 "; THENCE NORTH 88020'47" WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Y "; THENCE NORTH 55001'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 55001'22" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211054'40" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50019'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 24056'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16015'39" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58030'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE Page 3 Order No. 7333688 ALONG THE ARC OF SAID BEGINNING OF A REVERS THE ARC OF SAID CURVE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, DESCRIPTION CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 045'08" TO THE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05 "; THENCE 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4. PARCEL B -6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X "; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 019'54" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 028'43 "; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 °15'45 "; THENCE SOUTH 58 014'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESCRIBED AS POINT "Z" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58 014'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 057'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104 023'32 "; THENCE NORTH 77 034'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1 040'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Z "; THENCE NORTH 31 °45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31 045'06" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 151.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180 °32'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66 °21'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 62 °12'52" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88 002'05" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °09'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 009'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32 054'39" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05 "; THENCE NORTH 31 045'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF Page 4 DESCRIPTION Order No. 7333688 BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. EXCEPTING FROM THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -1. SCHEDULE B Page 1 Order No: 7333688 U50 Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in the policy form designated on the face page of this Report would be as follows: Al 1. PROPERTY TAXES, INCLUDING ANY ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED WITH TAXES, TO BE LEVIED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999 -2000 THAT ARE A LIEN NOT YET DUE. A 2. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL OR ESCAPED ASSESSMENTS OF PROPERTY TAXES, IF ANY, MADE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 0.5, CHAPTER 3.5 OR PART 2, CHAPTER 3, ARTICLES 3 AND 4 RESPECTIVELY (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75) OF THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS A RESULT OF THE TRANSFER OF TITLE TO THE VESTEE NAMED IN SCHEDULE A; OR AS A RESULT OF CHANGES IN OWNERSHIP OR NEW CONSTRUCTION OCCURRING PRIOR TO DATE OF POLICY. 3. EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS, PIPELINES, DRAINAGE AND /OR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES THERETO OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE EASEMENT PARCEL(S) HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED AND /OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS DEEDS OF RECORD. AFFECTS: PARCELS B -2 THROUGH B -9 Ax 4. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, CONDEMNED BY FINAL DECREE PURPOSE: SEWER CASE NO: 3058N RECORDED: JANUARY 9, 1975 AS DOCUMENT NO. 75- 005919 OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. 5. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE PERFORMANCE UNDER AN AGREEMENT REFERRED TO THEREIN DATED: NOT SET FORTH TRUSTOR: M & B ASSOCIATES, a California Limited Partnership TRUSTEE: TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82- 272624, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LAND AND OTHER LAND. Page z SCHEDULE B (continued) Order No: 7333688 U50 Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ e 6. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE PERFORMANCE UNDER AN AGREEMENT REFERRED TO THEREIN DATED: JULY 14, 1982 TRUSTOR: M & B ASSOCIATES, a California Limited Partnership TRUSTEE: TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: ENCINITAS UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED: NOVEMBER 4, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82- 341140, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LAND AND OTHER LAND. e 7. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES, INGRESS AND EGRESS RECORDED: FEBRUARY 22, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83- 055102, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. H 8. AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN DATED: JANUARY 20, 1986 BY AND BETWEEN: ANDERSON BROTHERS, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (GRANTOR), AND TERRAL INVESTMENT COMPANY, A California Corporation, AND INVESTORS LEASING CORPORATION, A California Corporation, AND M & B ASSOCIATES, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND AL F. MAYO AND MANSOUR HEIDARI, AND AL F. MAY AND JESSE R. OAKLEY AND ROGER Q. MC FARLAND AND PHILIP G. DE CARION AND DUANE WHITE AND FRANK B. CARR AND WILLIAM M. BARTON RECORDED: FEBRUARY 21, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 070006, OFFICIAL RECORDS REGARDING: SEWER EASEMENT REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. 9. AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN DATED: JANUARY 20, 1986 BY AND BETWEEN: ROBERT LEE ISAACS AND ROWENA JUIN ISAACS AND THOMAS Page 3 SCHEDULE B (continued) Order No: 7333688 USO Ynnr RPf` Dnorol n no nano n... GRAYSON (COLLECTIVELY, GRANTOR), AND TERRAL INVESTMENT COMPANY, A California Corporation, AND INVESTORS LEASING CORPORATION, A California Corporation, AND M & B ASSOCIATES, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND AL F. MAYO AND MANSOUR HEIDARI, AND AL F. MAYO AND JESSE R. OAKLEY AND ROGER Q. MC FARLAND AND PHILIP G. DE CARION AND DUANE WHITE AND FRANK B. CARR AND WILLIAM M. BARTON (COLLECTIVELY, TERRAL) RECORDED: JULY 3, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 276592, OFFICIAL RECORDS REGARDING: SEWER EASEMENT REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. AJ 10. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS RESERVED IN A DOCUMENT (NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE AS TO THE PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF SAID EASEMENT) PURPOSE: FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY RECORDED: APRIL 3, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998- 0187785 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. SAID EASEMENT HAS BEEN CONVEYED AND /OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD. AL 11. A PENDING ASSESSMENT FOR THE DISTRICT SHOWN BELOW. WHEN NOTICE OF THE ASSESSMENT IS RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER THE ASSESSMENT SHALL BECOME A LIEN ON SAID LAND. DISTRICT: OLIVENHAIN WATER STORAGE PROJECT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 96 -1 (FY 1999 UPDATE) DISCLOSED BY: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM AMENDMENT RECORDED: JUNE 2, 1999 AS DOCUMENT NO. 99- 380290 OFFICIAL RECORDS NOTICE OF AMENDED ASSESSMENT RECORDED JUNE 2, 1999 AS DOCUMENT NO. 99- 380291 OFFICIAL RECORDS. An END OF SCHEDULE B AC NOTE: IF THIS COMPANY IS REQUESTED TO DISBURSE FUNDS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS TRANSACTION, CHAPTER 598, STATUTES OF 1989 MANDATES HOLD PERIODS FOR CHECKS DEPOSITED TO ESCROW OR SUB- ESCROW ACCOUNTS. THE MANDATORY HOLD Page 4 SCHEDULE B (continued) Order No: 7333688 U50 Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ PERIOD FOR CASHIER'S CHECKS, CERTIFIED CHECKS AND TELLER'S CHECKS IS ONE BUSINESS DAY AFTER THE DAY DEPOSITED. OTHER CHECKS REQUIRE A HOLD PERIOD FROM THREE TO SEVEN BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE DAY DEPOSITED. NOTE: ANY FUNDING WIRES TO CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY ARE TO BE DIRECTED AS FOLLOWS: BANK OF AMERICA 1850 GATEWAY BOULEVARD CONCORD, CALIFORNIA ABA 121 - 000358 CREDIT TO CHICAGO TITLE SUB- ESCROW DEPOSITORY ACCOUNT NO, 12359 -50752 FURTHER CREDIT TO ORDER NO: 007333688 ATTN: TOM VOTEL TITLE OFFICER .v JTF 1AMD /AT 2AMEND /JRS 3AMEND /JRS 4AMEND /JRS i Oder No: 7333688 - U50 Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ As part of the settlement of a class action lawsuit, we are required to place this notification in all preliminary reports: IF YOU BOUGHT, SOLD OR REFINANCED A HOME (RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY) IN CALIFORNIA BETWEEN JULY 1, 1989 AND FEBRUARY 28, 1997, PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING: Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement in a class action lawsuit filed in the Superior Court for Los Angeles County, a settlement agreement has been entered into that provides persons who bought, sold or refinanced residential real property in the State of California between July 1, 1989 and February 28, 1997, with certain rights. If you are such a person and you are now engaged in an escrow transaction with Chicago Title Company, Gateway Title Company, Benefit Land Title Company or Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, you have the following rights: If one of these companies previously handled a residential escrow transaction for you that involved residential real property in which a mortgage, promissory note, or similar debt instrument, repayment of which was secured by a duly recorded deed of trust, was fully paid, satisfied or discharged and a reconveyance of that deed of trust was executed and was delivered to one of those title companies for recording but was inadvertently not recorded, you have the right to request that a release of obligation or reconveyance be recorded in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. To obtain this right you must: (1) Establish to the satisfaction of the title company that you actually closed an escrow between July 1, 1989 and February 28, 1997, which was handled by one of the above - listed title insurance companies, in which a mortgage, promissory note, or similar debt instrument secured by a duly recorded deed of trust was fully paid, satisfied or discharged and a reconveyance of that deed of trust was executed and was delivered for recordation to the title company that handled the prior transaction. Proof of said transaction shall be made by presenting a closing statement, preliminary report, title insurance policy or a paid escrow invoice which identifies you and the prior deed of trust; and (2) Request in writing the recording of a reconveyance or release of obligation in the event that one inadvertently had not been previously recorded in the escrow transaction previously handled by one of the above -named title companies. KSS -aoio,ieee. OCHICAGO TITLE COMPANY THIRD AMENDED Reference: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ PRELIMINARY REPORT Dated as of: April 23, 1999 at 7:30 AM Order No.: 7333688 - U50 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception in Schedule B ^r not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules. Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in the attached list. Copies of the Policy forms are available upon request. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to in Schedule B and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in the attached list of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY Title Department: CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 925 "B" STREET SAN DIEGO, CA. 92101 (619)544 -6234 fax: (619)544-6279 TOM VOTEL TITLE OFFICER 0 RING SERVIC �F ENCINITAS SCHEDULE A order No: 7333688 U50 Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ 1. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: A FEE AS TO PARCEL B1 AN EASEMENT MORE FULLY DESCRIBED BELOW AS TO PARCELS B2 THROUGH B9 2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: JESSE R. OAKLEY AND DIANA M. OAKLEY, AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 67.2232% INTEREST, AND KEVIN K. TAKABAYASHI AND SUZANNE M. TAKABAYASHI, AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 32.7768% INTEREST 3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of SAN DIEGO and is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION PRR Page 1 DESCRIPTION Order No. 7333688 PARCEL "B" OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1997 - 0614690 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING: PARCEL B -1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 005'09" EAST, 524.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 4 026'14" EAST, 328.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 031'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 003'22" EAST, 500.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 71 °07'30" EAST, 263.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 30.10 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 °53'06" TO THE CENTER LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTER LINE IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17°9'52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 036'54 "; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 015'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 038'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33 016'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 034'36" WEST, 263.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 °58'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 032'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84 °05'09" WEST, 313.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. RESERVING THEREFROM A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS TOGETHFv WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF DESCRIBED IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE BELOW. PARCEL B -2: A NON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP NO. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS "EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON ". A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT Page 2 DESCRIPTION Order No. 7333688 SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE. PARCEL B -3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CE:-.TER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CO *TCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS DESCRIPTION. PARCEL B -4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X "; THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 276.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 050'40 "; THENCE SOUTH 34 058'38" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34 058'38" EAST, 54.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67040'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 46.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 051'11 "; THENCE SOUTH 76031'46" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 007'27 "; THENCE NORTH 88 020'47" WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Y "; THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 55 °01'22" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211054'40" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50019'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 24056'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16015'39" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58030'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE Page 3 Order No. 7333688 ALONG THE ARC OF SAID BEGINNING OF A REVERS THE ARC OF SAID CURVE NORTH 55 °j1'22" EAST, DESCRIPTION CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 045'08" TO THE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05 "; THENCE 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4. PARCEL B -6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X "; THENCE SOUTH 72 °07'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ..-ONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGY A CEh_PAL ANGLE OF 10 019'54" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49028'43 "; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25015'45 "; THENCE SOUTH 58 014'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREIN DESCRIBED AS POINT "Z" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58014'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1057'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104023'32 "; THENCE NORTH 77034'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1040'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Z "; THENCE NORTH 31045106" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31045'06" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 151.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180032'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66021'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 62012'52" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88002'05" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39009'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39009'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32054'39" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53058'05 "; THENCE NORTH 31045'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF Page 4 DESCRIPTION Order No. 7333688 BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVF DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND NORT::WESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. EXCEPTING FROM THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -1. SCHEDULE B Page I Order No: 7333688 U50 Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in the policy Form designated on the face page of this Report would be as Follows: Al 1. PROPERTY TAXES, INCLUDING ANY ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED WITH TAXES, TO BE LEVIED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999 -2000 THAT ARE A LIEN NOT YET DUE. 2. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL OR ESCAPED ASSESSMENTS OF PROPERTY TAXES, IF ANY, MADE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 0.5, CHAPTER 3.5 OR PART 2, CHAPTER 3, ARTICLES 3 AND 4 RESPECTIVELY (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75) OF THE REVENITF AND TAXATION CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS A RESULT OF THE TRANSFER OF TITLE TO THE VESTEE NAMED IN SCHEDULE A; OR AS A RESULT OF CHANGES IN OWNERSHIP OR NEW CONSTRUCTION OCCURRING PRIOR TO DATE OF POLICY. s 3. A NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 3114 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, AS DELINEATED UPON AN ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF SAID DISTRICT ENTITLED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 96 -1 (OMWD WATER STORAGE PROJECT) FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON THE OCTOBER 8, 1996, IN BOOK 30, PAGE 42 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1996 - 0511030 BOOK OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS, RECORDED OCTOBER 8, 1996 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1996 - 0511031 AND 0511032, OFFICIAL RECORDS. C 4. EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS, PIPELINES, DRAINAGE AND /OR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES THERETO OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE EASEMENT PARCEL(S) HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED AND /OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS DEEDS OF RECORD. AFFECTS: PARCELS B -2 THROUGH B -9 5. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, CONDEMNED BY FINAL DECREE PURPOSE: SEWER C "SE NO: 3058N RECORDED: JANUARY 9, 1975 AS DOCUMENT NO. 75- 005919 OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT- 0 6. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE PERFORMANCE UNDER AN AGREEMENT REFERRED TO THEREIN DATED: NOT SET FORTH TRUSTOR: M & B ASSOCIATES, a California Limited Partnership TRUSTEE: TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA =Rea - Toi31 /e7nx Page 2 Order No: 7333688 U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 2, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82- 272624, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LAND AND OTHER LAND. e 7. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE PERFORMANCE UNDER AN AGREEMENT REFERRED TO THEREIN DATED: JULY 14, 1982 TRUSTOR: M & B ASSOCIATES, a TRUSTEE: TITLE INSURANCE AND CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: ENCINITAS UNION ELEI RECORDED: NOVEMBER 4, 1982 AS RECORDS California Limited Partnership TRUST COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA 4ENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT FILE NO. 82- 341140, OFFICIAL AFFECTS: THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LAND AND OTHER LAND. 8. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY PURPOSE: PUBLIC UTILITIES, INGRESS AND EGRESS RECORDED: FEBRUARY 22, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83- 055102, OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. x 9. AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN DATED: JANUARY 20, 1986 BY AND BETWEEN: ANDERSON BROTHERS, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (GRANTOR), AND TERRAL INVESTMENT COMPANY, A California Corporation, AND INVESTORS LEASING CORPORATION, A California Corporation, AND M & B ASSOCIATES, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND AL F. MAYO AND MANSOUR HEIDARI, AND AL F. MAY AND JESSE R. OAKLEY AND ROGER Q. MC FARLAND AND PHILIP G. DE CARION AND DUANE WHITE AND FRANK B. CARR AND WILLIAM M. BARTON P HLLNeG9, 23/93ok Page 3 Order No: 7333688 U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ RECORDED: FEBRUARY 21, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 070006, OFFICIAL RECORDS REGARDING: SEWER EASEMENT REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. r 10. AN AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS CONTAINED THEREIN DATED: JANUARY 20, 1986 BY AND BETWEEN: ROBERT LEE ISAACS AND ROWENA JUIN ISAACS AND THOMAS GRAYSON (COLLECTIVELY, GRANTOR), AND TERRAL INVESTMENT COMPANY, A California Corporation, AND INVESTORS LEASING CORPORATION, A California Co- oorat_on, AND M & B ASSOCIATES, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND AL F. MAYO AND MANSOUR HEIDARI, AND AL F. MAYO AND JESSE R. OAKLEY AND ROGER Q. MC FARLAND AND PHILIP G. DE CARSON AND DUANE WHITE AND FRANK B. CARR AND WILLIAM M. BARTON (COLLECTIVELY, TERRAL) RECORDED: JULY 3, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86- 276592, OFFICIAL RECORDS REGARDING: SEWER EASEMENT REFERENCE IS MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. AJ 11. AN EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS RESERVED IN A DOCUMENT (NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE AS TO THE PRESENT OWNERSHIP OF SAID EASEMENT) PURPOSE: FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY RECORDED: APRIL 3, 1998 AS FILE NO. 1998 - 0187765 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID DOCUMENT. SAID EASEMENT HAS BEEN CONVEYED AND /OR RESERVED IN VARIOUS OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD. AA END OF SCHEDULE B AC NOTE: IF THIS COMPANY IS REQUESTED TO DISBURSE FUNDS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS TRANSACTION, CHAPTER 598, STATUTES OF 1989 MANDATES HOLD PERIODS FOR CHECKS DEPOSITED TO ESCROW OR SUB- ESCROW ACCOUNTS. THE MANDATORY HOLD PERIOD FOR CASHIER'S CHECKS, CERTIFIED CHECKS AND TELLER'S CHECKS IS ONE BUSINESS DAY AFTER THE DAY DEPOSITED. OTHER CHECKS REQUIRE A HOLD PERIOD FROM THREE TO SEVEN BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE DAY DEPOSITED. PRELJMBC- 9 /M /MJ SCHEDULE B Page 4 (continued) Order No: 7333688 U50 Your Rcf: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ NOTE: ANY FUNDING WIRES TO CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY ARE TO BE DIRECTED AS FOLLOWS: BANK OF AMERICA 1850 GATEWAY BOULEVARD CONCORD, CALIFORNIA ABA 121 - 000358 CREDIT TO CHICAGO TITLE SUB- ESCROW DEPOSITORY ACCOUNT NO. 12359 -50752 FURTHER CREDIT TO ORDER NO: 007333688 ATTN: TOM VJTEL TITLE OFFICER w JTF 1AMD /AT 2AMEND /JRS 3AMEND /JRS Order No: 7333688 - U50 Your Ref: PARCEL B OF BDRY ADJ As part of the settlement of a class action lawsuit, we are required to place this notification in all preliminary reports: IF YOU BOUGHT, SOLD OR REFINANCED A HOME (RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY) IN CALIFORNIA BETWEEN JULY 1, 1989 AND FEBRUARY 28, 1997, PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING: Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement in a class action lawsuit filed in the Superior Court for Los Angeles County, a settlement agreement has been entered into that provides Persons who bought, sold or refinanced residential real property in the State of California between July 1, 1989 and February 28, 1997, with certain rights. If you are such a person and you are now engaged in an escrow transaction with Chicago Title C )mpany, Gateway Title Company, Benefit Land Title Company or Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, you have the following rights: If one of these companies previously handled a residential escrow transaction for you that involved residential real property in which a mortgage, promissory note, or similar debt instrument, repayment of which was secured by a duly recorded deed of trust, was fully paid, satisfied or discharged and a reconveyance of that deed of trust was executed and was delivered to one of those title companies for recording but was inadvertently not recorded, you have the right to request that a release of obligation or reconveyance be recorded in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. To obtain this right you must: (1) Establish to the satisfaction of the title company that you actually closed an escrow between July 1, 1989 and February 28, 1997, which was handled by one of the above -listed title insurance companies, in which a mortgage, promissory note, or similar debt instrument secured by a duly recorded deed of trust was fully paid, satisfied or discharged and a reconveyance of that deed of trust was executed and was delivered for recordation to the title company that handled the prior transaction. Proof of said transaction shall be made by presenting a closing statement, preliminary report, title insurance policy or a paid escrow invoice which identifies you and the prior deed of trust; and (2) Request in writing the recording of a reconveyance or release of obligation in the event that one inadvertently had not been previously recorded in the escrow transaction previously handled by one of the above -named title companies. KSS . 107/ alu(TO T^T3+ r. Ab r1B AIidAT(1 Y4t'M!S WEED AK uw:ESS DT14 ww'M M 1(;,Cw Z TAA STA EWWS ad: Z JE558 Y. ; PL1NA M. O&aZl rocs 21171 PAVILLION DRIVE yl W7A AM, U. 92X5 L J rio w Tb. [saw f". yG, elp GRANT DEED 46 n ALT: 15 ♦ to Y DOC # 1998 - 0187785 APr 03, 1998 11:36 A w1cm. REM 9R19[N W e w"'S TIM (#fUIY J. 9fP6 min R07.11BFR SPACE AWYE THIS UK FOR AMMMI A6t0— MUFAITARY TRANSFER TAX i SM 0 w IWU OR 10 Vill Of PfOW?y COs, a wrDWd en w wo Im is" at>An6rm. re OLN n"dl* 1 FOR VALUABLE CORSID:NAWN.re sO III **hismckno*ftcd,I(ft), (ql 'ma 'TT U '. .e/•wr "M to (Sa mm3IT I) A /r�l all that roil PtpprtF situated to Ia0 Gly 0( nr ui TTAd (or In ar oftwWdled em 01) SAN 0!800 owrIlm as tledrs (uan wo descimb") (:. 2naa.z c) Ta., ft Vd eio ., ..tea m DK* ley C r7aM/a frx ap. RAr0 0/c, s,ahM a 11 in WOIen r es Y r ..5.. 94 JUL - a F999 D ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS AM W'S S PMN Aq PORTIONS OF 1264 -091 -16, 0264 -091 -17 An 1264- 091 -19 Ecewtedan . 19_ 11 STATE QF CUCMA 9s do? I - r",o' te—. eMn r 1/e ■aY�/,A, a"rim m me a W SYM.,r~ I1eM Wwgl/Y 3 to ArvrAe a w en ml cash a ,a,+x»n a1./ar u u as anw_ YAre t1YM_ _ GOIO-0M Y YM n�W /WNI/rl. ML aCMr.l I" b me IAP -k- pow e. tmuPSS eR aN am cd" fN YL THUBT LIYIh1C MsT oATm 74. 1 OF 1990 i i "° °. 'puACPALA a i•ruMOM AOovr►fiDOMgMT 158 State of c LITORNIA County of D3aecp On 7/26/98 before me, NANCY iiR 1a.. sINER, NOTARY PUeD IC wn ROGM Q. WF"Un. jasa Il. WLi,67 LL Y� NA7v.�> 1N70. personally appeared pHTl.rpr_ ayA➢IR cral M- n➢IlYTrIN rrsWgMM 3 personally known to me - OR - El proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons) whose name(e) Islare subeMbed to the wlthln Inleur"nt end W- knowledgad to me that heyaheRhey executed Nancy H. Warner the same In hle/her /their authorized U OeNm. n021 capacltylias), end that by hi$1heNthelr �O signatures) On the Instnmlent the person($). �Nn Ga iXV§lW 1A"M on.* or the entity upon behalf of which the pemon(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and offPCiial seaL O. to w•� a Tt"*ardAYW*w4M4W sdby low. A may Wv vWu &u bparws*#Vondiedpama-tan0wApmw Gr•dbrd �ee1lvimere d ida Lam. CAPACM CLAMED BY SIGNER ■ ..,;,r— ,,v, "N" ❑ ►ARTNCR(5T ❑ LRM£0 ❑ GENERAL Q ATigitlV.R +FACT G Tttusr�� ❑ 0 A9Q&W 0N9 FWATOR ❑ orNER. saw ar wErFammmNQ NN. O I. W B D• l a a f,., .., u; DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED OOCOMEtfi TTni OR TWE OF mxwEM NUMBER (Sf PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIUNEN,5) OTHER THAN WEO ABOVE PIi1 WIWLLMGIM.I ARR1CIAnw•au M.MM Pn by TpY•(,r.O,Pp,(iYY141�M yoo 159 CAU MIA ALW")MV Si AC , MLEDOMEW .W State of CALIFcMTA CouiTty of olt"GE on 3/27i 98 before me, DMJM 4I MURT. $DIARY PUBLIC a�n NYt*1RLKOfrEEA.E c..•J+Eme.ro *wrAAs pew4mdyappearad Druu M. GULLY nOgk610,mA� persortaQy known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on Ire basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(a) whose name(s) isiare subscribed to tna within instrument and ac- knowledged 10 me that he /shamery exerted the same In his /herltheir authorized cepactty(Ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the Instrument. K n WITNESS my hand Dnd official seal. MW r iemK" W OOC721 GL}s �d i WMiNR 6,/jl.N1 J1, V11111 I T�A iIl/ e� t�� b n7l �vY.� ^^• �i �� Q �i i�� b �t✓' ^l -'� 0� QIC d6T� fl'.i W tCC p101R1) ftw$A ni nwud 0 oft" roan. CAPACITY CLIUMED YY SMER ❑ e:avrovu 0 DDRPOR4TE OFFICM rnu 0 PARfFIFA(al rl tW IZB Q ATMM*Y -REACT 0 +eusmtsi ❑ CLNRDUU4C0N!V VAT09 ❑ MHM 3p3@ is r111R$E71rM r,t v,voqu�0n� DESCRIMON OFATTACNED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMEW NUMBER OF PAGES DATF OF DOCUMENT SMNER S) 0150 TWIN NAMED AM 0110 IOMW POYAW ASSOM70H 0 IM N Ww 1.0. 0011". Crg1 hit CA 193"46 +nn r 160 M131T A ROGER 0. NCFARLAND, PRTLT? G. DECARtON, JISSE A_ OAALEY, DIANA M. CARLEY, AL F. KAYO, NANZ= MAYO, PHILIP G. DECAAION, TRUSTEE OF TAE DECARION LIVING TRUST, DATED FEBRUARY 28, 1991, ALVIN F. NAYO AND RAn= MAYO, TRDBT°3S OF THE NAYO FAMILY TRUST, DATED FEBRUARY 19, 1990. 161 BUIBIY B JESSE R. OAKLEY AND DIANA M. DARLEY, AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 67.22328 INTEREST, AND %EVIN X. TAAABAYSH: AND "AM M. TAUMASHI, AS COMMUNITY PROFEBTY AS TO AN UIMIVIDSD 32.77611 IPTE'RM. UK DESCRUMON 162 EMUTT C PARCEL '9' OF CENTIi^CATE OF COMPL7AM'F, PIRJAlI= DEf!`3L0. 5. _391 Ati OC:T^4T; NO. 1997- 0614690 OF OTFICIAL ARCORDS, 1181440, PARM. 8 -1: T®1T PORTION or 776 SO"MAST ' MP7ER Cr EECIToN 8, TOILTSRTF 13 som, Y-"G1{ I W[ST, SAW BRRNARDTNO MBRIDIAW, rI TFIP CITY OF ENCTNITAS, COG!RT OF 564 D7vm, 87317E OP CALIPOmu, ACCDPDINO TO rem OFRICYAL PIMP TB sor. DFscitig D AS POLUM : COI4WICItG AT '.IS NDRTIIMSSTIRLT COR=R OF TNT HOVI7IETLY 674.00 FEET CM .4S1,7= ALOW TER WWT'IRLY LIM) OF TEI Wl9?MT 610.00 FAT (M`Stnm AI,G9q T3a WN9T7D1LY Ln(l) OF SAID BOOTRIA= QWU=, MU= AIM THE NURT1aW LIII TUSRmor NoOTI 64405'09' FIST, 576.35 FEET TO THE TRUB POINT OF EMII1RI1Pi; TIRMC3 LUVINO SAID LI26 NORTh 4626'14' EAST, 320.94 FKrr. T)01106 )TORTE 14431'110 BAST, 211.33 TM, TIMM NORTH 16003'22' BAST, WO-43 FM TO TIM LOCRHOILY L120 OF CITY OF Di=rTAS TRACT 90. 80 -183 ACCOROnIG TO MAP TEERWF ND. 12962. STEED IN TWS OFISCE OF TES =NTY RHCOADCR OF SAN DIROO COMM, OCTOBER 23, 1991; TIMME MONO SAID LI30 SOM 71.07.30• U-sT, 262.33 Ptrr 7O TRR ELCSgt:I11G or A TAMOEKT 1949.00 FOOT RADIOI CUM COW-AVL NORTJMAM LY; TZINCS ALONG TWO ARC OF SAID CORVS 30.10 F>D4'L THM E A CEW AL ANGLI Of 0.5)'06' TO T30 CUrM LINE W WIDFLONBR DRIVE AS SAID C=ZR LENS IS MOW ON SAID MAP NO. 37082, 6AID MINT LYING OF 730 ARC Or A 350 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAME NISTIRLY, A RADIAL LINE T107OI= SAID POINT BEARS OOOTM 70'2{•42' �, TY619CE ALO610 1107 900TFCMY �TTOM OF 3, CURV9 31. Se FR T1190W[ A C33rrRAL A1W.9 OF 6.16.44 ', IMMKS PW= 17.090.60.6.02' V%37, 16.24 PEST; TMWE S0= 71 °07.58' EAST, 144.98 F= TO TLS BE2IlW918 OF A TAUG52r, 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CVKAVE NORTHBRLY; "- XCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THR0008 A CENTRAL AN= OF 74 36154 "; TMKNCE RADIALLY TO SAID CORW SOOM 10.15109' WTST, 61.16 FEET; THEM 30M 4.38'20" MAST, 378.72 FM; T11EYC£ SOM 33.16.30' IAST, 260.16 F93Cr; TMCPCI 604TH 34.34'361 WIV. 763.59 PEST+ 7=CT NORTH 34438.39" MIST, 78.97 FEET; VICE SOUTS 74•12'116 VWT. 409.33 rM 7O TIM NORTHEASTERLY CORWER OF BA:D SOVrAMLY 624.00 FBSI OF TIM X=rcRLY 636.00 FIXT TIM SOVTIDWST OO..RTER; TMNCE AIM MM YORTREkU LING THAS80► WITS 84405'096 HEST, 313.65 PEST TO THE TRUE MINT OF BEGINNING. nBERVINO TIOR]7FROM A NON•337(CLOSITE IADBDFT AND RTTMM Or KAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AID OTILITT PUF" N AND APPOR'T1S000IS TRZRM TO BI OSND IN 001!1081 WITH o2w2s TOOSTUR HITS THE RIOFTT TO NATi1m Am rW41NTAiN ONAIPM FA=.17 CI WD ISCAVATION AIM 5MRANXG2r SLDW& "POND TIM LINI7S OF SAID SIGHT OF NAY OVER, UND9RL ALONG AND ACROSS 74405E PORTIONS THEREOF DESCRIBED IN PARCELS B -3 TXRO= 19 :VC=lVE BELOW. PARCEL B -2 A MAR- EXCLUSIVE SAMM'T AND 94MU OF WAY FOR P9LVATX ROW POAPWXS Aim APPORTIISANCES TNBRETD 70 SE USED IN COMMON KITH OTNERS, OVEN, UWBR, AU)37G ASD ACROSS WT (LOWER ORTVR BEING A PORTIOY OF SAID MAP NO. 12682 SEONN T712RS01; AS 'EASEMENT POR FOSLIC RCADMAY F,7POSSS TOOBTIOR WITH THE RIGHT TO E7CTPd-D AN0 MAINTAIN ORAINAO8 FACILITIES AND ECCAVATIOR AM 3MBA UNT SLOPES BEYOND :t¢ LIMITS OF SAID RIGWr OF WAY DEDICATED AND ACCIPITO XER"'. OLSQ>)- 11mm + Z2MM :ZMWMB RAtl.1 W ZAlM =a vg mu Oo'OZ RIIIARR Y :b OWUOSIon ffi OI .0S.SS.T29 AO TIM 7MIIAID M HDOO[BI, ,..A ES'LLI aM d0 JIM S&L MllgW ZDAM 'A7iL S M Z.MiM 34= SUM = WAS SSLG+M Y 10 fAII8MI088 S&L M .60.6S.E6 AO H*mw RM'd7 m M momu Lad SR'9T ZAMOJ aIYs AO ')dV $ILL MROW A73QLSMm3.lDO$ ! tom lim .ZZ.T0.55 *LO09 Sxm =106 am aODadld, mill TMLdvw M ,'mmL1011 fAlolmO anlm] mean XOW oo'oc bLmwa-xcx M to ANUMU OS1 MZ Ob am 00'ot 'IM .MT0,51 Mb3LW L'd= r.A. LS8I0d a18IMM 3dORM RIlda aA AM COMMaf S -R 78.7RY4 '3iMMA0 77nw=s ru LiBA orec5 xmmz SI MLL dO =" 00 0-Yt9 XTMM 00R ate d0 7ml xTn4m am MO XMMMRM U10EIWwm aL dY oa oaL 1cRD M0 aIOlSD701/ R of am AC drRSR aZMR 40 tuz==R mK 'mL :z ^M 2&vs rm aa.L sm, 00' oce immum a= ao =u co -SZ9 L7MmII oo am AO amt AT01 M9 314 OL I388d 9R'LTt 'LM •L9OC.99 81344 =. = I.Lt.Lo.5T 10 37Eln wam Y 110== bad 6T16L tan:, am d0 rM a1 0Ma7M 83amm 1x71l;f im MIZIRM SAVW Mim a= 00 out JA01YA Y d0 Ol11MIIam UL OL Im Et'LST 'aa .99.TE69L S.= 3DJ= '.TT.TS.9 dO S'SOMY'IYI"= Y 890OIOLL ASIU SC'99 RA147 WYR m 34Y a.1 00W'IY l]IDmt M&VZMUQ 9"n� Qai a 60. Doc .UCQ.itQ Y do olaitt on au 0A LU 9►'iZ 'Low off'ol.L9 RLWS ROMEO f1m dd'►R 'zm .IE.SS.9E 31008 bl=LtkW ROOM IXXMIMM SIR AO .A. WOd 8V 0lHII to aJUMIMM ALROA Y OL I= 96'IE9 'ISM .8E.86.9t SIOOR Llama �.011.05.t5 AD rMKV 71OLIASD M g00 = STdd 69'949 "= a" AD DSY STY SUM Z=m 'ATRILqw 3A%OMW 7A= WIM 7004 00.00E MMKVr Y AD ORIMMM al OL Sad DZ' SEZ 'ISS! .ZD.ZS.4T RIMS TM.V. I.Y. SQOd COMMM 9ADgWNTR' 9i MU IM bAMjomi5" 91O770A 516 aioi m =22 OWM7 AO drUS am AO 8ML7 MM m1:. IUCIM MI LIU OD'D► 'aM 10 42SIR Y ►•g 7=aVd 'ImLamma 42144 40 X. LLIOd W 07 MS310 ILUVIIEIa ZKM Cre 'SORIWQL d0 SMIOd a1, OL Lad W91 'ASSN .40.95041 UODR Ski �.N.IT.9 AO E7OMY TCV= Y MOODELL STSA 9S' 9I RAW ass AO MoILM91p7 u ATAUIa04 UL OWN IOSIIBL SLm .E9.9t.BL %LAOS Sym 7MIOd Wo l000lu aI7 7MIaM3 Y 'ATUL88M EAXMD SA= solmal 7004 00.05E Y AO 3V m AO 08IAR LRIod aIM4 'ZRRZT ON m DIMS do mull 47Emu= aTMS RIIM EA,'3a %7ho 9m l d0 UT7 8ELbm OIYS d0 KDTi7 FWM MIL LM flaa.m=q o RMOTM SM a1HI3Jm SMISe aMM7 AO dI=t OIMS AO UR17 SSSKiJ SILL 'SUQM Al IM 00'05 'MM JO dlUS Y c -e mr)wd 'IAIIMI= 6-H fgY10wu E -d rA03Md III WM4 O7g7M49a 'R HDILOES dO nJ;MO lftM&=t OTMt AO VX ZLWd 78m mloM aWM n m 'VW= 'EEAO ARl 10 'WIN cm 10 RLIkI7 ML C OAM mdr"s L! DUMVW aMr 9011TADXS aW SSIAMMU 30MiIIM1O WIMLEIMW OW1i a1 w ELL JMZI .,... SSSM 42uls o •gxzgxo KLIM ""= ML am SR OL OLalODIL b70MML01LHQd" OYM MSWAU ALI137A C" aYOd SLMASU Mod XVM AO .L10I11 an LImi34MS 9AISO27)8 -ROIL M 191 (1711411 5807 0 7.142893 NOLImEIROSHU DESCRIMON 164 HANI3TT C CON TIMUID ALOW TIE ARC OP SAID CURVE 17.56 FWr JMROO A C9RTRA1, ANOR.E Or SO.19.09` TO TRF 3OL7HERLY LiNR Or FARCBL 71-4 ABOVE, TNJINCE NORTH 36964'51' AIST. 60.41 FEET TO A MINT LYING ON TIM NA1RTHiMY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ADM. SAID PONS ICING TAE RROIFQFIN(: OF A MIN- TA901PT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CLIM CONCAVE RDATERES7SRLY. A RADIAL L31M TRAMOB MRS SOU$ 14'1S'79- LAST: TMPM NORTHPASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF "M CURVE 10.42 MET 7MROUM A CORRAL AMA OF 99`30.01' TO THE S3LN2MIIW0 OF A REV3RAR 46.00 FOOT RAD704 CURVE CONCAVE SOO79UASTIRLY: TNONCR ALONG I= ARC OF BALD CUM 3.14 FM TRROOGH A G7i'IRAL AICLR OF 3045'08" TD THB E4T.I3WIMG OF A PJVIRSr 20.00 FOOT RA27M CDFvR CORFAVE WESTERLY; THOCS ALOWC THZ ARC OF SAID CURVE 15.44 FEET IONMUM A CENTRAL ANGLE OT S79S4.OS`, THMNCT NORTH 55'01'22- 1A6T. 20.00 FELT TC TR FOI3F! OF IRiTMMLN6. =CMnTWG TBERrFRON THAT PORTION LYING RITHIN TUR NEmINADOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL 3.4. PARClIL R -6 A 5711F OF LAW, 40.00 FEET IN VIM, THE CHITUN LIEF OF SAID STRIP OF L„ED pBIRO DESCRIBD AS FOLLOWS: MIMING AT TIRE NU-"N ABOVE DLSCRIBEDD POINT 'X'; THENCE SOUTH 72107•SB- EAST, 144.97 FM TO THE 3ROTWWIM Or A TRIMIXT 400.00 FOOT RAD103 CTIR78 CON(71W HORT=my: T'HLNCH ALOYO THE ABC OF MID CUR" 72.11 FRET THROOOR A CEwrpAL A.90LE OF 10'19'54' TO T06 BIGIANTNU OF A RLYEASE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CUM CONCAVE sm-m- R9TF.R7.V; TRETNCE ALQM THE ARC OP SAID CURVE 773.1) FRET TTOUOOM A cmr..RAL AHOLF. Or 49.34'47': TO THH HLGIEMINO OP A RMILSE 200,00 FOOT XW= CARP- OOMGVe NOR7'REACIfaLY; TRENCH AMMO THE ARC OF SAID CV= 132.27 FEET TBROOM A C'ffir7R AWQLH OF 2S'15'45'; THENCE BOOTH 31'14'54" LAST, 172.29 FEET TO A FCTNT HEREIN DRBCRIUD AS POINT -z' or T'MIS MMIPTIM; UK CoWrINOING smm 5B•14's4" EAST, 40.32 FEZ; TR07CS BOM 1937-55- N NOT, 761.38 FEET 70 THE BBOTM rM OF A TANGENT 120.0) Toor RADIUS CURVE CONC7AVC NORTHEASTERLY, T7®R'S ALOW TNU ARC Or SAID CUM 21834 PELT STOW= A CRNTR►L ANOLB OF 104 °2 ]']2`i TENONCB SORT% 77034'23^ ACT, 64.14 PM TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF -,= WAMIALY 767,55 7WCI (NiAMORYI ALM THE BAXTBRLT LINE) or TWR W'RRLY 690.00 FEET (MXgVRED AIM TER 30U1'BEBLY LIA) OF SAID SOUTEEAST QMTIR DISTANT THEREON SOOTS 1- 40'IS- WBST, 30.62 Fm Yam Tim NURTHIMSTURLY CDRNHA mw r. TIC B]]]LUES OF LIED STRIP OF ].AND TO PF PROLONGn OR SWORTM;ED PO AS TO T=KDMTN ASTWFW OF SAID A ►TELLY LIn OF TNU SOUTa9xLY 1,7.33 PEST Or TRR EASTERLY 630.00 FNZT OF SAIO SOUr9WT QUARTMR. PARCEL I -7: BEOL`UING AT TEE %MREIN ABOVE DPSCRIRRD POINT '2 TRENCH WORTH 31- 4S'06' EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THS BEGLNNIP; Of A EON- TANUBNT 20.00 FOUL LADlvg C=vx CLOIGVE N MERLY. A RADIAL LINE THROE iN SAID POTR'1' "US SOLI% 31 °45'06- R'RST; THENCE E AETALT ALONG THE ARC OF RAM CURVE 10.84 FRRT TUROUG11 A "ZnTAL ANGLE or 33.51.09' TU T73 MCZWWD OF A RIVLtMH 48.00 F'Oar RADIUS (U" CONCAVE WE6TF.RL'f, T)UWCH ALOMO 7M ARC Or SAND CURVE 373.35 FAT T1 =Mk A CENTRAL AMULR or 190.32.18' TO TA IECINNIN0 OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE STOUTXZASTMMYS THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF %AID LT&VR 23.16 FELT T7R7DUDE A CWVRAL AFY. 1989 4 : Q' ?M 1 DESCRIMON 165 SEIIIBIT C COIFIINUEB AWLE Of 66.21 24- 10 TLM EASTERLY LM OF PARM B -6 ABOVE; TR&ICB NOR-,K 52- 17'S2- WEST, 44.64 FRET TO THE MBS7ERLY 1,11i1; OF PARCEL B -6 AWVU, SAID {V:A: ISM THE BFOTM1.I* OF A MLR- TAISCIT 70.00 FOOT RAD= CURVE CDNCAVE 1msTER:.Y, A RADIAL LINE THRM= SAID POIIFI EMS SOUTH 18002'05" EAST; TRACE N017MVESYSRLY A6M TIM ARC OF 6410 CURVE 33.67 Fill TAROUM A CZTRM, MME OF 39'09.22- TO THE 3093=== OF A RKM.S8 CURVE 13.67 FRET TIMU W A CWSRILL AWGLE OF 37'09.22' 710 THE BEOIMINO OF A REVERSE CUM 68.00 FOOT 2ADIUS CURVE CVWAVg NORIHEASTmO,Y: T7®IC11 AID= TRH ARC OP SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET TM OVGH A CO TRAL ANOLR OF 32194'39' 70 TO BWnWINO OF A AEYEREE 20.00 FOOT RADIOS CURVE CORGVE SOiTIERGSTnLT; 11WNCU AWM TIM ARC OF SAID CURVE 16.94 rEST 71 wmn A CORRAL M" M 53 °58'05'; TXE= BORIS 31.45'06- FAST. 30.OU FRET TO TIM POINT OF og=nr=. 21 aPTIHO TEEREFF[M 'FEAT PORTION LYIIIO NITIId 'PM LU?ucIN ABOVE DRSCRIEED PARCRL E -6, PARCEL B -0: TEAT PORTION LYM EASTMY OP TEE EASTERLY LIRE OF 3HE REEg3NAlM D&WRISM PAR= 8-3 AND 40R7W=Y OF THE NORTHERLY LI:3® OF THE H2"jNAEDVE CE3CRIEED PARCEL E -6 AND SW17ML9TQLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE COSCAVE SORTH ASTERLY AND TANO&FT TO SAID EASTERLY LIRE OF FARM E-3 AND SAID BOFTY.c y LDC OF PARCEL 9-6. PARCEL B -9: nAT PO¢Tial LYING EASTERLY OF THR RA9TERLY LINE OF TIM HERIMMOVE DESCRIBm FAWM E-6 Alm 60UEEMLY OF TBE SOUrMMLY Lila m TUB UDDOLIWBOVE Don,BED PARCEL E -6 AND HORTHHEETIRLY OF TEE ARC OF A I0.00 FOOT LUDIUE CNIPE CONCAVE 39UMAYTMY AM) Z4.b"U OSI TO SAID EASTERLY LIES OF PARCEL, 8-6 AND 6'AIO SO(R'1laRLY LINE OF PARCEL B-6. RECEITIUO FROM TIM ®MIN ABOVE DECCRIRED PARCELS B -3 THROXM B-5 INU UBIVZ TBCSE POETIORS S.YI1M NIIEIR 17M BFMEEIRIIBOY3 DESCRIBED PARCH. 8-1 ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT RECORDED ON DEC 05. 1M RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: DOCUMENT NUMBER MINTY RECORDER GREGORY J. SMITH COUNTY RECORDER City of Encinitas, 505 So. Vulcan Avenue SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE Encinitas, Ca. 92024 Attn: City Clerk TIME: 9:18 AM NOT APPROVED FOR DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (Section 66499.35 of the Government Code) IN COMPLIANCE: The Director of Community Development of the City of Encinitas has determined that the parcels of real property described below have been divided or have resulted from a division in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and with provisions of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code. It has been determined that the subject parcels meet the standards of conforming lots, pursuant to Section 30.16.010 of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code. This Certificate of Compliance is adjusting the 7 existing legal lots described herein. The resulting parcels "A" through "G" will be standard for the Zoning Ordinance requirements for NET area (14,500 sq. ft.) in the RR -.5 Use Regulations as of this date. The subject RR -.5 zoning specifies a minimum net lot area of 2 acres. The adjustment proposes adjusted parcels in excess of this minimum, at 10 acres and larger. Owners: Alvin F Mayo, Trustee -Mayo Family Trust, Nanette Mayo, Trustee -Mayo Family Trust, Nanette Mayo, Al F. Mayo, Roger Q. McFarland, Jesse R. Oakley, Diana M. Oakley, Phillip G. Decarion, Phillip G. Decarion, Trust Plat Map: (SEE EXHIBIT "A ", ATTACHED) Description: (SEE EXHIBIT "B ", ATTACHED) NOTE The plat ma and description in exhibits "A" and , attac > been provided by the owner of the property, and neither the City of Encinitas nor any of its officers or employees assume responsibility for the accuracy of said description and map. This Certificate of Compliance shall in no way affect the requirements of any City, County, State, Federal or local agency that regulates development of real property. This certificate relates only to issues of compliance or noncompliance with the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinances enacted pursuant thereto. The parcel described herein may be sold, leased, or financed without further compliance with the Subdivision Map Act or any local ordinance enacted pursuant thereto. Development of the parcel may require issuance of a permit or permits, or other ;rant or grants of approval. fklflccmeyo.doc (7 -21 -97) Case No: 97 -131 BA Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 264-091-3,16,17,19 & 264-270-4,9, 10 Date: July 28, 1997 Bye:;E-1 Bill Weedman, City Planner jklAccmayo.doc f7 -21 -971 LA i T OF LNUINTAS BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT No. 97 -131 BA KEY MAP EXHIBIT A k PARCEL "A -1" SCALE 1" = 400' 1 f i PARCEL "A -1" 11 l II PARCEL PARCEL I "C -1" — PARCEL ' J "D -1" 4, PARCEL PARCEL "F -1" "E -1" _ SHEET 1 OF 10 SDE 3528.03 /PLAT KEY PARCEL "G -1" ,� yW onp 81GRA991 1. W. / M01 w„�. SURE ,m 1 ENCMAS. G 92W4 P11GIC (]!O) 155 -5315 cm a � "RAN LAM ANNINVU0 t,i I r OF tNLAN IA5 UOUNUARY ADJUSTMENT No. 97 -131 BA PARCEL "A" EXHIBIT A LINE BEARING DELTA I LENGTH RADIUS L1 SO4'09'24 "W 1046.09' L2 S84'05'09" E 524.35' L3 N04'26'14 7E 328.94' L4 N84'31'11 "E 211.33' L5 N18'03'22 "E 500.43' L6 N71'07130"W 507.66' C1 03'39'56" 372.72' 5826.00' L L1 PARCEL "A" r ENGNEERN% Imo. 4407 MANCHESTER, SUr E 105 ENCINfTAS, CA 92024 PHONE: (760) 753 -5525 CM B M • PLANIMM LAW SURVEYM PARCEL 4 PM 12666 PARCEL 4 v PM 1918 Q Q � Q TPOB %V SCALE 1" = 250' SHEET 2 OF 10 SDE 3528-03/PLAT-Al °ARCEL r� wB -4' r nB l 1 ' t i �; PT. 'Y w !AMT AUJuJ I MtN I "13-1" TO "B '" EXHIBIT A / _E 1" = 200' PT. 'Y 1 ' SHEET 3 OF 10 3DE 3528.03 /PLAT—B1 aiw o�oure aia�riq No. FNOnNS. U G2N. PnPVL (]E0) ]�J -5125 MAL aANGERM " n,ww we SUMP= U�A=116 r I1 LINE Lt BEARING DELTA N04'26'14 "E LENGTH 328.94' RADIUS L2 N84'31'1 1"E 211.33' L3 N18'03'22 "E 500.43' L4 N71'07'30"W 263.33' C1 00'53'06" 30.10' 1949.00' C2 06-18'44" 38.56' 350.00' L5 S17'52'02"W 16.24' L6 N72'07'58 "W 144.98' C3 07'36'54" 53.16' 400.00' L7 S 10' 15'09" W 61.16' L8 SO4'38'28"W 178.72' L9 S33'16'30"E 260.16' L10 S54'34'36"W 263.59' L11 N3458'38 "W 78.97' L12 S74'32'31 "W 403.33' L13 N84'05'09 "W 313.65' AJ bUUINUAKT AUJUSIMENI No. 97 "ARCEL "C -1" TO "C SM DIEOUMO BOMEFFtM INC. 4407 MANCHESTER, SUITE 105 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 PHONE: (760) 753 -5525 SCALE 1" = 200' 131 BA - _Pr. 1 TPOB 1 1 li ,r "c-7`\ LINE BEARING DELTA LENGTH L1 N34'58'38"E 78.97' L2 S74'32'31 "W 403.33' L3 SO4'09'24 "W 624.00' L4 SW05'09 "E 1362.53' L5 N01'40'36"E 419.03' L6 N89'55'44 "W 420.32' L7 N5919'1 VW 206.25' L8 N78'39'37"W 155.67' L9 N3458'38"W 273.23' SHEET 4 OF 10 SDE 3528.03/PLAT-Cl ✓r LIV�.,uv i AJ DUUNUAKT AUJUW MLN I NO °ARCEL "D -1" TO "D 11 I i III I I n EXHIBIT A TPOB �i i' •D -4• 1 D -9•� D -5 / PT. Ym N J 1 97 -131 BA "D -6" PARCEL " D -1" ' •D -T - . PT. "r i ~�•D -r SCALE 1" = 200' t "D -2' D -8" v LINE BEARING /DELTA LENGTH RADIUS L1 N54734'36 "E -T7'1 593.01' C 1 535" 38.01' 300.00' L2 S58'1 4'54" E �N $4q i2 S7735'23" E 48.00' L4 S83'06'43 "E 436.33' VOA S56'07'33 "E 431.90' L6 S01'40'36"W u L7 8 117.20' L8 S43'55' 15" W 97 -131 BA "D -6" PARCEL " D -1" ' •D -T - . PT. "r i ~�•D -r SCALE 1" = 200' t "D -2' D -8" v LINE BEARING /DELTA LENGTH RADIUS L1 N54734'36 "E -T7'1 593.01' C 1 535" 38.01' 300.00' L2 S58'1 4'54" E 227.28' L3 S7735'23" E 48.00' L4 S83'06'43 "E 436.33' L5 S56'07'33 "E 431.90' L6 S01'40'36"W 11.47' L7 S50'21 @,34"W 117.20' L8 S43'55' 15" W 66.43' L9 N4,742'24 "W 358.13' L10 S77'34'23 "W 268.71' L11 S01'40'36"W 348.52' L12 N89'55'44 "W 420.32' L13 N50'19'11 "W 206.25' L14 N78'39'37'W 155.67' L15 N34'58'38"W 273.23' SHEET 5 OF 10 SDE 3528.03 /PLAT -D1 r �. i yr LNL IN I A o UUUNUAKT AUJUSTMENT No. 97 -131 BA 1 ,. ARCEL E -1 TO E 1 1 EXHIBIT A � I ICI I 1 L l PT. "Y �5 I SCALE 1" = 200' "E -7' / PT. E -7 t' t� IV rn J PARCEL "E -1" SHEET 6 OF 10 L11 3DE 3528.03/PLAT E1 r N dm J IF i "E -Z" E -8" E -6" LINE I BEARING DELTA LENGTH RADIUS C 1 06' 18'44" gym. 350.00' L1 S1752'02"W on °o L2 S72'07'58"E 144.98' C2 0736'54' 53.16' 1 400.00' L3 S10'15'09 "W 61.16' L4 SO4'38'28"W 1 178.72' L5 S33- 10.19 "E 260.16' L_LtL 1454'34'36E urnNm uom C3 0715'35" 38.01' 300.00' L7 S58' 14'54" E 227.28' L8 S72'35'23'E N y m L9 S83'06'43"E a �u L10 S56'07'33 "E 431.90' t' t� IV rn J PARCEL "E -1" SHEET 6 OF 10 L11 3DE 3528.03/PLAT E1 r N dm J IF i "E -Z" E -8" E -6" LINE I BEARING DELTA LENGTH RADIUS C 1 06' 18'44" 38.56' 350.00' L1 S1752'02"W 16.24' L2 S72'07'58"E 144.98' C2 0736'54' 53.16' 1 400.00' L3 S10'15'09 "W 61.16' L4 SO4'38'28"W 1 178.72' L5 S33- 10.19 "E 260.16' L_LtL 1454'34'36E 329.41' C3 0715'35" 38.01' 300.00' L7 S58' 14'54" E 227.28' L8 S72'35'23'E 48.00' L9 S83'06'43"E 436.33' L10 S56'07'33 "E 431.90' L11 N01'40'36"E 549.26' L12 N85'22'56"W 862.14' L13 N75'28'1 1 "W 688.16' C4 03'27'36" 117.69' 11 949.00' PARCEL F -1 TO EXHIBIT A y 'F -r I .F-9' �r'F -ar PT. or �F -r \ \ -F-r� is f \ \ \ PT. 'r.F -S* 'F -S \ \j� OF-4' NO LINE BEARING LENGTH L1 N7734'23' E 100.00' L2 S21038'22'E 898.87' L3 N84.05'09' W 454.00' L4 N01'40'36' E 767.55' 4407 WW-MESM, SUITE 105 ENOIN,Gi, CA 92024 PHONE (760) 753 -5525 OW B ORMER MD • FUM/Mp MW KOVEYM SCALE 1" = 250' , 1 I , I, 1 , , PARCEL "F -1,. SHEET 7 OF 10 SDE 3528.03/PI F1 PARCEL "G -1" vv%J 1 mCI`I TO go G EXHIBIT A I P X' ' T. • ' i I i Pr. or \ •c-7 00 r►r. •r.�_�. •G-50 SCALE 1" = 250' SAN DEGUITO aNgrM33wA ND. 'a� I PHONE P 60) 5323 25 105 PARCEL ., G -1 " TPO SHEET 8 OF 10 SIDE 3528 -D3 /Pi ING LENGTH '36"E 756.08' '34 "W 117.20' ' 15" W MS21*38'22"E 66.43' '24 "W 358 .13' 23 "W 168.71' 22" E 898.87' L7 S84'05'09 "E 196.00' SCALE 1" = 250' SAN DEGUITO aNgrM33wA ND. 'a� I PHONE P 60) 5323 25 105 PARCEL ., G -1 " TPO SHEET 8 OF 10 SIDE 3528 -D3 /Pi CITY OF ENCINITAS - BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT NO.97 -1318A OWNERSHIP APN: 264 -270 -04 APN: 264 - 270 -10 OWNERSHIP: OWNERSHIP: AL F. MAYO PHILIP G. DE CARION, TRUSTEE, NANETTE MAYO DECARION LIVING TRUST ALVIN F. MAYO, TRUSTEE, AL F. MAYO AND NANETTE MAYO, MAYO FAMILY TRUST, 2 -19 -90 TRUSTEES MAYO LIVING TRUST NANETTE MAYO TRUSTEE, ROGER Q. MC FARLAND MAYO FAMILY TRUST, 2 -19 -90 JESSE R. OAKLEY JESSE R. OAKLEY DIANA M. OAKLEY DIANA M. OAKLEY PHILIP G. DECARION, TRUSTEE, PHILIP G. DE CARION DECARION LIVING TRUST, 2 -28 -91 ROGER Q. MCFARLAND OWNERSHIP: OWNERSHIP: APN: 264-091 -16 APN: 264-091 -17 PHILIP G. DECARION, TRUSTEE ROGER Q. MCFARLAND DECARION LIVING TRUST, 2 -28 -91 ALVIN F. MAYO, TRUSTEE ALVIN F. MAYO, TRUSTEE, MAYO FAMILY TRUST, 2 -19 -90 MAYO FAMILY TRUST, 2 -19 -90 NANETTE MAYO, TRUSTEE NANETTE MAYO, TRUSTEE, MAYO FAMILY TRUST, 2 -19 -90 MAYO FAMILY TRUST, 2 -19 -90 JESSE R. OAKLEY ROGER Q. MC FARLAND DIANA M. OAKLEY JESSE R. OAKLEY PHILIP G. DECARION, TRUSTEE, DIANA M. OAKLEY DECARION LIVING TRUST, 2 -28 -91 OWNERSHIP: OWNERSHIP: APN: 264 -091 -19 APN: 264-091 -03 ROGER Q. MC FARLAND ALVIN F. MAYO, TRUSTEE PHILIP G. DECARION MAYO FAMILY TRUST, 2 -19 -90 JESSE R. OAKLEY NANETTE MAYO, TRUSTEE DIANA M. OAKLEY MAYO FAMILY TRUST, 2 -19 -90 ALVIN F. MAYO, TRUSTEE MANSOUR HEIDARI MAYO FAMILY TRUST, 2 -19 -90 MOSHEN HEIDARI NANETTE MAYO, TRUSTEE MAYO FAMILY TRUST, 2 -19 -90 AL F. MAYO NANETTE MAYO APN: 264 -270 -09 OWNERSHIP: PHILIP G. DECARION Page 9 of 10 511 F CITY OF ENCINITAS - BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT NO.97 -131BA OWNERSHIP SIGNATURES TRUST, 2/19/90 NANETTE MAYO, TRUSTEE MAYO F.�tMILY TRUST, 2/19/90 LIVING TRUST, 2128/91 MANSOUR wr Page 10 of 10 EXHIBIT B SDE 3528.03 SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 FILE. LAII DATAISURVEYS13528SUR V\352803BA -A. W PD LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF ENCINITAS BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT NO. 97 -131 BA PARCEL "A" PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12566, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 14, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83- 119771, OFFICIAL RECORDS, TOGETHER WITH PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1918, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1973 AS FILE NO. 73- 265534, OFFICIAL RECORDS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8 BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 26 OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23,1991; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 4 °09'24" WEST, 1046.09 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 °05'09" EAST, 524.35 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 4 °26'14" EAST, 328.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 031'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 °03'22" EAST, 500.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 71007'30" WEST, 507.66 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 5826.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 372.72 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 °39'56" TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING Page -I- EXHIBIT B SDE 3528.03 SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 FILE: L:It DATAISUR VEYS13528SURV1352803BA -B. W PD LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF ENCINITAS BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT NO. 97 -131 BA PARCEL "B" PARCEL B -1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 005'09" EAST, 524.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 4 °26'14" EAST, 328.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 °31'11" EAST, 211.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 °03'22" EAST, 500.43 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23,1991; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 71 °07'30" EAST, 263.33 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 30.10 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 °53'06" TO THE CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTERLINE IS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 °26'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 °18'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 °07'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 036'54 ", THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 015'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 °38'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 33 016'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 034'36" WEST, 263.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 058'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 032'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84 005'09" WEST, 313.65 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. RESERVING THEREFROM A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF DESCRIBED IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE BELOW. PARCEL B -2: A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP NO. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS "EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE Page -2- EXHIBIT B LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON" A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS. TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE: PARCEL B-3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 °26'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 °18'44" THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS DESCRIPTION. PARCEL B-4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X ", THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 276.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 °50'40 "; THENCE SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 54.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 °40'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 45.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 °51'11 "; THENCE SOUTH 76 °31'46" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 °07'27 "; THENCE NORTH 88 020'47" WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Y; THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 55 001'22" WEST, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211054,40" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 019'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE, THENCE NORTH 24 056'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A Page -3- EXHIBIT POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 ABOVE. SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16 °15'39" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 °30'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 °45'08" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05 ", THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -4. PARCEL B-6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X", THENCE SOUTH 72 °07'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10-19-54- TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 028'43 "; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 °15'45" THENCE SOUTH 58 014'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Z" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58 014'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1057'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104 °23'32 "; THENCE NORTH 77 034'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1 040'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER.. PARCEL B -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Z "; THENCE NORTH 31045'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31 °45'06" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 151.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180 032'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66 021'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 62 °12'52" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88 °02'05" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °09'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32 °54'39" TO THE BEGINNING Pale -4- EXHIBIT B OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05 ". THENCE NORTH 31 °45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B-6. PARCEL B-8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B-6. PARCEL B -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B-4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. EXCEPTING FROM THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -1. Page -5- EXHIBIT B SDE 3528.03 SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 FILE: L:1 t DATAISU R VEYS13528 SU R V1352803BA -C. W PD LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF ENCINITAS BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT NO. 97 -131 BA PARCEL "C" PARCEL C -1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTERLINE IS SHOWN ON CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 °18144 ", THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 °36'54 ", THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 015'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 038'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33 °16'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 54 °34'36" WEST, 263.59 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 34 °58'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 °32'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 4 °09'24" WEST, 624.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER THEREOF, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER SOUTH 84 °05'09" EAST, 1362.53 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 1040'36" EAST, 419.03 FEET, THENCE LEAVING LAST SAID LINE NORTH 89 055'44" WEST, 420.32 FEET, THENCE NORTH 50 019'11" WEST, 206.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78 °39'37" WEST, 155.67 FEET, THENCE NORTH 34 058'38" WEST, 273.23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. RESERVING THEREFROM A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF DESCRIBED IN PARCEL C -3 THROUGH C -9 INCLUSIVE BELOW. PARCEL C -2: A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP NO. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS "EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON ". Page -6- EXHIBIT B A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE: PARCEL C -3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 °26'42" EAST, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 °18'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS DESCRIPTION. PARCEL C-4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X ", THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 276.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 050'40" THENCE SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 54.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 040'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 46.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 051'11 ", THENCE SOUTH 76 °31'46" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 007'27 "; THENCE NORTH 88 020'47" WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL C -5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINTY; THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 55 °01'22" WEST, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211 °54'40" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 019'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL C -4 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 24 °56'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL C -4 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY. A Page -7- I*","willo . RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16 °15'39" EAST, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 030'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 045'08" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05 "; THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL C -4. PARCEL C-6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X ", THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10'19'54' TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 °28'43 "; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25°15'45 "; THENCE SOUTH 58 014'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Z" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 °57'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104 °23'32 "; THENCE NORTH 77 034'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1 °40'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL C -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Z "; THENCE NORTH 31'45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31 045'06" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 151.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180 632'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66 °21'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL C -6 ABOVE: THENCE NORTH 62 °12152" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL C -6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88 002'05" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °09'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32 054'39" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05 ": THENCE NORTH Page -8- EXHIBIT B 31 °45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL C -6. PARCEL C-8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL C -3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL C -6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL C -3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL C -6. PARCEL C -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL C -4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL C -6 AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL C -4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL C -6. EXCEPTING FROM THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS C -3 THROUGH C -9 INCLUSIVE THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL C -1. Page -9- EXHIBIT B SIDE 3528.03 SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 FILE. L. \t DATA \SURVEYS \35285 U R V\352803BA -D. W PD LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF ENCINITAS BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT NO. 97 -131 BA PARCEL "D" PARCEL D -1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTERLINE IS SHOWN ON CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO, 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 °26'42" EAST, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 °07'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 036'54 "; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 015'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 °38'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 33 °16'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 °34'36" WEST, 263.59 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RETRACING NORTH 54 °34'36" EAST, 593.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 39 °00'41 WEST, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 38.01 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 °15'35 "; THENCE SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 227.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 °35'23" EAST, 48.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 83 00643" EAST, 436.33 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 56 °07'33" EAST, 431.90 FEET TO THE NORTH- EASTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER SOUTH 1040,36" WEST, 767.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 84 005'09" WEST, 550.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 1040'36'* EAST, 419.03 FEET, THENCE LEAVING LAST SAID LINE NORTH 89 °55'44" WEST, 420.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 50 °19'11" WEST, 206.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78 °39'37" WEST, 155.67 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 058'38" WEST, 273.23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PORTION: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 1 °40'36" EAST, 756.08 FEET, THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 50 °21'34" WEST, 117.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43 055'15" WEST, 66.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43 042'24" WEST, 358.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 77 °34'23" WEST, 268.71 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 1 °40'36" WEST, 767.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84 °05'09" EAST. 650.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Page -10- EXHIBIT B RESERVING THEREFROM A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF DESCRIBED IN PARCELS D -3 THROUGH 0-9 INCLUSIVE BELOW. PARCEL D -2: A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP NO. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS "EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON ". A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE: PARCEL D -3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 °26'42" EAST, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 °18'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS DESCRIPTION. PARCEL D-4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X ", THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 275.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 °50'40 ", THENCE SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 54.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 040'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 46.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 051'11" THENCE SOUTH 76 °3146" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 °07'27" THENCE NORTH 88 °20'47" WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO Page -11- EXHIBIT B TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL D -5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Y; THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST. 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 55 001'22" WEST, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211 °54'40" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY: THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 °19'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL D -4 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 24 °56'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL D -4 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16 °15'39" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 030'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 °45'08" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05" THENCE NORTH 55 001'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL D -4. PARCEL D-6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X ", THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 019154" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 °28'43 "; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 °15145 "; THENCE SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Z" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1'57'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104 °23'32 "; THENCE NORTH 77 °34'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1 °40'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL D -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Z "; THENCE NORTH 31'45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE Page -l2- Ixiaili�ii NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31 °45'06" WEST, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 151.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180 032'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66 °21'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL D -6 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 62 °12'52" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL D -6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88 °02'05" EAST, THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °09'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32 054'39" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05 "; THENCE NORTH 31 °45'06" EAST. 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL D -6. PARCEL D-8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL D -3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL D -6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL D-3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL D -6. PARCEL D -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL D -4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL D -6 AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL D -4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL D -6. EXCEPTING FROM THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS D -3 THROUGH D -9 INCLUSIVE THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL D -1. Page -13- EXHIBIT B SDE 3528.03 SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 FILE: L:It DATAISUR VEYSI3528S URVI352803BA -E. WPD LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF ENCINITAS BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT NO. 97 -131 BA PARCEL "E" PARCEL E -1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID CENTERLINE IS SHOWN ON CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 88 -183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 °18'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 °07'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 °36'54 "; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 01509" WEST, 61.16 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 4 038'28" WEST, 178.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 33 °16'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54 034'36" EAST, 329.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 39 °00'41 WEST, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 38.01 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 °15'35 "; THENCE SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 227.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 °35'23" EAST, 48.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83 "06'43" EAST, 436.33 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 56 607'33" EAST, 431.90 FEET TO THE NORTH- EASTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER NORTH 1040'36" EAST, 549.26 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID MAP NO. 12882; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 85 °22'56" WEST, 862.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 75 °28'11" WEST, 688.16 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1949.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 117.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 °27'36" TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. RESERVING THEREFROM A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF DESCRIBED IN PARCELS E -3 THROUGH E -9 INCLUSIVE BELOW. PARCEL E -2: A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP NO. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS "EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON ". Page -14- EXHIBIT B A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE: PARCEL E -3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 °26'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 "18'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS DESCRIPTION, PARCEL E-4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X', THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 276.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 °50'40 "; THENCE SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 54.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 °40'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 46.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8951'11"; THENCE SOUTH 76 °31'46" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 °OT27 "; THENCE NORTH 88 020'47" WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL E -5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINTY; THENCE NORTH 55 001'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 55 °01'22" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211054,401, TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 °19'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL E -4 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 24 °56'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL E -4 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY. A Page -15 EXHIBIT B RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16 015'39" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 °30'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 °45'08" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05" THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL E-4. PARCEL E-6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X ", THENCE SOUTH 72 °07'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 °19'54" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 028'43 "; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 015'45 "; THENCE SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "2" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 057'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID. CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104 °23'32 "; THENCE NORTH 77 °34'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1°40'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL E -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Z THENCE NORTH 31045'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31 °45'06" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 151.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180 °32'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66 °21'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL E -6 ABOVE, THENCE NORTH 62 012'52" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL E-6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88 002'05" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °09'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32 °54'39" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05 "; THENCE NORTH Page -16- EXHIBIT B 31 °45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL E -6. PARCEL E-8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL E -3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL E-6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL E -3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL E -6. PARCEL E -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL E-4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL E -6 AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL E-4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL E-6. EXCEPTING FROM THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS E -3 THROUGH E -9 INCLUSIVE THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL E -1. Pale -17- EXHIBIT B SDE 3528.03 SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 FILE. L: \1 DATA \SURVEYS\3528SURV1352803BA -F WPD LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF ENCINITAS BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT NO. 97 -131 BA PARCEL "F" PARCEL F -1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 1 °40'36" EAST, 756.08 FEET, THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 50 °21'34" WEST, 117.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43 °55'15" WEST, 66.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43 °42'24" WEST, 358.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 77 °34'23" WEST, 268.71 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RETRACING NORTH 77 034'23" EAST, 100.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 21 038'22" EAST, 898.87 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 84 005'09" WEST, 454.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 1040'36" EAST, 767.55 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, RESERVING THEREFROM A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THE NORTHWESTERLY 40.00 FEET THEREOF, PARCEL F -2: A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP NO. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS "EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON". A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE: PARCEL F -3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Page A 8- EXHIBIT B BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 °18'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS DESCRIPTION. PARCEL F -4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X ", THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 276.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 °50'40 "; THENCE SOUTH 34 058'38" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 54.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 040'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 46.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 051'11 ", THENCE SOUTH 76 031'46" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 "07'27 ", THENCE NORTH 88 °20'47" WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL F -5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINTY; THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 55 001'22" WEST, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211 °54140" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 019'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL F4 ABOVE, THENCE NORTH 24 °56'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL F -4 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16 °15'39" EAST, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 °30'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 °45'08" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05 ", THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL F -4. PARCEL F -6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Page -19- EXHIBIT B BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT'X ", THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 019'54" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 °28'43"; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 015'45'; THENCE SOUTH 58 014'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Z" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 1057'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104 023'32" THENCE NORTH 77 °34'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1'40'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, PARCEL F -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT'Z "; THENCE NORTH 31'45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31 045'06" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 151.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180 °32'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66 021'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL F -6 ABOVE, THENCE NORTH 62 °12152" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL F -6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88 002'05" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °09'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32 054'39" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05 "; THENCE NORTH 31'45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL F -6. PARCEL F -8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL F -3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL F -6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL F -3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL F -6. PARCEL F -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED Page -20- EXHIBIT B PARCEL F -4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL F -6 AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL F -4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL F -6. Page -2 1 - EXHIBIT B SDE 3528.03 SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 FILE.L \1 DATA \SURVEYS \3528SURV\352803BA -G WPD LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF ENCINITAS BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT NO. 97 -131 BA PARCEL "G" PARCEL G -1: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 1'40'36" EAST, 756.08 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 50 021'34" WEST, 117.20 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 43 055'15" WEST, 66.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43 °42'24" WEST, 358.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 77 °34'23" WEST, 168.71 FEET TO A POINT THAT BEARS NORTH 77 °34'23" EAST, 100.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 21'38'22" EAST, 898.87 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 84 005'09" EAST, 196.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL G -2: A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP NO. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS'EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON ". A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE: PARCEL G -3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 °26'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 °18'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS DESCRIPTION. Page -22- EXHIBIT B PARCEL G -4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X ", THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 276.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 050'40 "; THENCE SOUTH 34 058'38" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 54.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 °40'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 46.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 051'11 "; THENCE SOUTH 76 °31'46" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 007'27 "; THENCE NORTH 88 °20'47" WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 524.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL G-5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINTY; THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 55 001'22" WEST, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211 °54'40" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 019'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL G -4 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 24 °56'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL G-4 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16 °15'39" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 030'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 "45'08" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05 "; THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL G -4. PARCEL G -6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X ", THENCE SOUTH 72 °07'58" EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 °19'54" Page -23- .. EXHIBIT B TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 °28'43 "; TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 015'45 "; THENCE SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Z" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 °57'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104 °23'32 "; THENCE NORTH 77 °34'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1 040'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF, THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 77 °34'23" EAST, 108.27 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL G -1 DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 21038'22" EAST, 20.26 FEET FROM THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER THEREOF. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL G -1. PARCEL G -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Z THENCE NORTH 31 °45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31045'06" WEST, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 15125 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180 °32'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66 021'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL G -6 ABOVE, THENCE NORTH 62 012'52" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL G-6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88 °02'05" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °09'22" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32 °5439" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05 ", THENCE NORTH 31045'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL G -6. PARCEL G-8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL G -3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL G -6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL G -3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL G -6. PARCEL G -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL G -4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL G -6 AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE Page -24- EXHIBIT B SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL G -4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL G -6. SAND ;1 L. k N6.43% OF Page -1-5- RECORDING REQUESTED BY: GORDON L MCELROY D WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: pigg SAN DTF. , TTO ENGINEERING 4407 v GINEERING SEM' Encinitas CA 92024 CITY OF ENCIM ' .jC # 1994 - 0703192 08— DEC -1994 11 =13 AM OFFICIAL RECORDS �dH DIEGO OUNT CY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY SMITH, COUNTY RECORDU V. 6.00 FEES: 16.N AF: 7.00 MF: 1.00 SPA E O muT LI FOR RE ORD R' TcE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Pursuant to Section 66469 (a) & (e) NOTICE IS GIVEN that City of n ini City of Enrinitas, County of San Di according to Map thereof, No. 12882 County Recorder of said County on 0 and is corrected in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act as follows: of the Subdivision Map Act, tas Tract 'No. 88 -183 in the ego, State of California, filed in the Office of the 7tober 23, 1991, is in error, Section 66469 (a) & (e) of 1) The found 2" Iron Pipe, R.C.E. 29577 being an angle point monument on the southerly Subdivision Boundary and the southerly corner common to Lots 19 6 20 was destroyed during construction and replaced with a 2 "x 24" Iron Pipe with Disc Marked "LS 4306" 2) The 2" x 24" Iron Pipe with Disc Marked "LS 4306" at the easterly terminus of the 1949.00 foot radius curve on the southerly line of Lot 22 was set at an offset along the Subdivision Boundary, S 75 028'11" E, 2.00 feet from the actual corner. A fence post occupies the position of the true corner. 3) The alignment of a portion of the easterly line of Lot 23 at the southeasterly corner thereof was incorrectly shown as having a 20.00 foot radius and is hereby correctly shown on EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto. 4) The Southeasterly Corner of Lot 23 (See EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto) was not set due to its close proximity with the 2" Iron Pipe set on the Southerly Subdivision Line S 71 007'30" E, 0.14 feet from said point. 5) The location of the Proposed Private Drainage Easement in Lot 22 as shown on Sheet 8 of 11 is incorrect. See the attached EXHIBIT "B" for the correct location. I certify that the following is the name of the present fee owner of the real property affected by such corrections. WILDFLOWER ESTATES ASSOCIATES, A California General Partnership , 1827 I further certify that the above Certificate of prepared by or under the direction and control professional land surveyor. ka !'Ao a Correction was of the undersigned Gordon L. McElroy, L.S. Expiration Date 6 -30 -96 I, Alan D. Archibald, City Engineer for the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, certify that I have examined the foregoing Certificate of Correction and I find that the only changes shown hereon are changes provided for by Section 66969 (a) s (e) of the Subdivision Map Act. 21869 Fee: $16.00 Alan D. Archibald City Engineer R.C.E. 21869 Expiration Date 9 -30 -97 A� I-IW Alan D. Archibald, R.C.E. • � - Y V EXHIBIT "A" SCALE: 1" = 50' t'� o 0 of �n LOT 22 Q NG = a r ,1 L= 179.41' R= 380.00' n p= 27'0305" p � o 206.2133 45 27" 00_ o V. G D= 0.14' o, W/ Z � �,18q •92 0 . 06 32" L =23 10' � =4.08' 11" p '� N2312 9 O. S 83'13'48" E 36.82' e \ s, N 4'49'29" E 15.49' '/ ch \`c� L 0 T 2 3 y s PROPOSED MIYAM a DRAINAGE EASEMENT ^� o a o { 0 2 SAN DIEGurro ENGINEERING. INC. MR! YAMUt1RR x I" EMCrTA& 4 m� wage 30' I i I rr-I Wl 3� �IW JIB u—I� 0 ' JIB �I 3 J� , ' 1 �!Li7" 30' 23 " C�1g7 80 SCALE: 1" = 20' U U( rl IE29 LINE ARC DELTA BEARING DISTANCE L1 N 0'56'35" C2 W 15.76 L2 N 50'56'35" 1'31'24" E 17.50 L3 S 39'03'25" C5 E 10.00 L4 S 50'56'35" W 10.72 L5 S 0'56'35" E 15.74 L6 S 89'03'25° W 10.00 CURVE ARC DELTA RADIUS Cl 15.09 2'16'31" 380.00 C2 4.18 0'07'25" 1934.00 C3 10.10 1'31'24" 380.00 C4 6.74 0'12'03" 1924.00 C5 10.50 0'18'31" 1949.00 LOT 22 PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT 06, 44 I� Cz73 82 R R�1g2q 00 11614;,. CS Dzz 11 13 3q �� DZI2D 41�cn R. 1 O I m ova N ' 0+ a, 1p W(-' Ln 3 7S. 8'00 U . v�l I N SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY 28'11 E �m PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT RCD'D10 -19-94 AS F/P #1994- 0k>135Q9 L6 EXHIBIT "B" Sup cmvs ro Frrc+►�arrc iHc ...,,,.Amax:,.,: ,a oo.r s u m. Cmx ENGn+L-EAUiG . PwawrrG Lwo SuavmRs SDE 3529.02 APR. 5. 1999 4:42PM CT[ CUMMER SERVIC r 40wrdSAJ 11., aj� 072 F&N DIEM Goa g CArMc CO10AW Yheu leoorded Nall tes so=. F. o. lest lag, Su, D1efp G 921L2 ■ _ ,TIN: Office htTlrr, Root 611 4542 --P. 2/1: 455102 DF Sln:� "13 FED 22 F{ g �1 :6 COLT1. , �J .___SPAM gloves ran AlctllMIS DSv� aagroc T ms �e�� SW D h G is colip"Y fJgLiD2R conside rltNo6 1 ASWUTZS. a Califon!@ limited p{rtwrahip, (crustier), for {Unable 1 eesesast sad right of e� - up ,owe` gacigQ�IC COO&", a corporation (Grant*%), as described, to erect. esaatrect, sed octesg the land, berUaaftsr thraaa the size at. revs, repair, aainta,a and "a facilities consisting of: r*coo,tt t, relocate, distribution of for wires, 4b1b and appattsoaecee for tb{ tr,,,sLsles am DnraalCetlee farilftles, aad appurtenances Thu abero facilities will be LaaCell elm,w veer and under ties hOmtsafter described at seek locations and elwstfens Iron, does convotiest or eeeewnL Y Grant" say q, or berestt {r necessary. Grates ales Ms the right of ingrtst and egress, to, fro and along this uatoess !n, uPos. Ivor sod across the heselaaft*r described lands. Orontes fareber ban the right, but not the duty to clear and c iron "plesloes, bsildlsge, stroctsres and nstorlaln, bop hl, esteesns clear ulluat*d in the of which Dl this ur.sset sad right of way la herrby ranted to San p. State of CUiferals, dsserlbed as follwe: J West. ga Smth, Resr"t portion of the aouthwt Quarter of hctlm S. Township 13 N s gerwrdity lMrldli; described IN a Deed recorded July S, H79 n Rocerder'■ File/p., No. 2796Z9 of elficlel lecorde et esld CouatF of Sao Diego. J3 Ih{ saaasent in the afeeseUd leads shall be 12.00 rest in rcdtb, ; Mlag e.00 feet wasaro� It right "lea, es eocb n described Center Ilan: 1h K the FUIabing j i the e)• es' ZS�fr�eaatM a Center of eeld Section a; said realer Mars North 50' Cauc, 2357.01 reec; a South Quarter Corner thereof; tbeaaa gwtb 659 31, v PCiIR 01 1LGINN[NC sit r�ctunter 1Le bens fa dwatiba% ;uMee� trees e. a T7t17R PDINr � S14INNINC r g South sS Js' 13. rest, 1756.61 fret. t- el -one -a ' 1 1 1 ENGINEERING SERVICES ) O CITY OF ENCINITAS N 4J APR. 5. 1999 4:43PM CTC CUSTOMER SERVICE IL N0.4542 P. 3/13 ,-. 673 Crantor create to Grmtea tLa xlght to erect eed yintala w Grmtor'• Property edlerent to this sum.ot such anchorage u sq be u..."y fox Graat"'o purposes, Grmtor shall not erect, piece or eoestruct, nor perslt to be erected, placed or cro ho straoted, soy building or etr structure, plant my tree, drill or dis my wall, within this summt. Great" @lull not increase or decrease the ground Surface elevations within this Sasaa*et after Iwull@tim of Gemtw's facilities. witbost prior written cement of Grentae, wbich cotlaent shall not sste "o"bly be withhold. Grant" n temb" grant* to Gat" %be right to "sign any or all of the rights scanted in this aaeesaat In whole or in part to rA* Patitic Telephone and Telegraph Cospeay and/or to other raapanl" providing etlllty or comunicatiun facilities. Grantee shall hove the right but not the duty, to Cris or Twee@ trees and brash along or edjscent to this <saelisat and Tesoee meta from within this easeaeat wpe comehenever Grant" dsswe It aeeeesary- ssld right *lull not nli"w Grantor of the duty r persons. to trim or reeve@ tress cad brush to prevent danger or hazard to property or This aasawnt shall be Wading upon and icon to the benefit of successors, be'", a :eentes- *dn(oLtrston, gnEttees, llcon.ees, agents or "alias of Gr"rur and sraatas. .yTe�_I�NJ V_r`?%-2= WEDUM. Grantor axwcutsd this instr. rot this 11 t_ day of 1 • I9.81. gsecuted In the Ptevesc• of; Vftseas Drawn 111debr" charted I. N -1715 Veto IL N0.4542 P. 3/13 ,-. 673 Crantor create to Grmtea tLa xlght to erect eed yintala w Grmtor'• Property edlerent to this sum.ot such anchorage u sq be u..."y fox Graat"'o purposes, Grmtor shall not erect, piece or eoestruct, nor perslt to be erected, placed or cro ho straoted, soy building or etr structure, plant my tree, drill or dis my wall, within this summt. Great" @lull not increase or decrease the ground Surface elevations within this Sasaa*et after Iwull@tim of Gemtw's facilities. witbost prior written cement of Grentae, wbich cotlaent shall not sste "o"bly be withhold. Grant" n temb" grant* to Gat" %be right to "sign any or all of the rights scanted in this aaeesaat In whole or in part to rA* Patitic Telephone and Telegraph Cospeay and/or to other raapanl" providing etlllty or comunicatiun facilities. Grantee shall hove the right but not the duty, to Cris or Twee@ trees and brash along or edjscent to this <saelisat and Tesoee meta from within this easeaeat wpe comehenever Grant" dsswe It aeeeesary- ssld right *lull not nli"w Grantor of the duty r persons. to trim or reeve@ tress cad brush to prevent danger or hazard to property or This aasawnt shall be Wading upon and icon to the benefit of successors, be'", a :eentes- *dn(oLtrston, gnEttees, llcon.ees, agents or "alias of Gr"rur and sraatas. .yTe�_I�NJ V_r`?%-2= WEDUM. Grantor axwcutsd this instr. rot this 11 t_ day of 1 • I9.81. gsecuted In the Ptevesc• of; Vftseas Drawn 111debr" charted Sketch N -1715 Veto 1/4/03 NFAC 446M-01 coast. me. 5675616 A.P. No. 264.011 -16 fM- 011.17 -2- N bit A&VCLATU. a California lie ad Artmr9bis y v� R�mtEr/!^tT.•s..t7 ,"WWI w -w Tof.e r Z 2 t -a 1 0 i o i N 61- oafs -5 i i 0 n F 'Y APP,. 5.1999 4'43PM CTC CUSTOMER SERVICE i h, NO. 4542 P. 4/13 674 M go 4!. [[l"OMn lr[n.w�71 sfAFEOf CGUf O[t"1A a CQI,N" OF ��' • Naary �yhHc ¢[ uA to ;*Otw" 12. 1"3 Yel.t ws. w -AM tub Sf.n Rlpe.fly.M bw em rw--&,p O/IRaMRiCAL 'kb • CM7NMR I[o we M.tfrrd[P. --"- [he W ADM NfF[ IN= i wri NEfb w/ he14 e1 ■ � A, om <IIA � li\Y w+lw.{IYY wrYl �D i { z f [ o 1 OD 91 LJ r ' 1 0 N M r•' i. 1' I 1Y" i 1 r� 10.1999 2:37PM /. 1 z a 4 a 6 9 10 11 is 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20, 21 22 23 2d 2S 26 27 28 CTC CUSTOMER SERVICE 0.67780moP. Return to; i AaADO aKKAOY .rHwM W LAW 1G. YY4 .,at C. SAMUEL DLICK, City Attorney 100 Valley Blvd„ Escondido, CA Telephone: 746 -2200 Atwmm !w Plaintiff ,efAta.suw roa w.s IlAxe asiq X12 DJAN 9 1975 ROBERT 0. ZUMWALT, Clerk t oevrr SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF ESCONDIDO, A ) Municipal Corporation, ) Plaintiff, No, 3068N FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION V. i Parcel 53 O'AVENHAIN - 141 ) PARTNERSHIP, et al„ ) Defendants, ) It appearing to the Court that plaintiff has deposited into Court for the defendants entitled thereto the sum Of money assessed by the Judgment in Condemnation enter 1 in this proceeding; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the real property situated in the County of San Diego, State of California, and more particularly described In Exhibit "I" attached hereto and made a part hereof, be condemned to plaintiff for the construction and maintenance of a land outfall Dower, In fee simple absolute, unless a lesser estate Is described, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that a certified copy of this order be recorded In the office of the County Recorder of the County of San Diego, State of California, and thereupon title to said property des- -ribed In Mxhlblt "f" shall -1- • � r 1t 1 EcEiu I l tier OF ENCINITA`.: o� 0 to r to � ,MAY. 10. 1999 2:38P)r 'CTC CUSTOMER SERVICE-- - - s r.. r: t; b 1' L LI. 1,1 1 s 4 6 a 9 , u Qe 01 the Superior Court ;, ,;IN6,,,'• .1e^t°o'1 hUfM„gl bl l,q ype lop :•., •�:Ir.,;..; Ml ent'.n,l On file in jh eKKL W" Of FIR 0.ZVMVKT, c n,, LWC"d me .0J oa NO. 6778 - -P. 3 vest In plaintiff, and all interests of defendants OLIVENHA1N - 141 ` 1 PARTNERSHIP, TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, JOSEPH DAVID GODWIN, OLGA GODWIN, N. S, WALBRIDGE, j B. G. WALBRIDCE, SAN DIEGO TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, �. ' ROGER G. MILLER, and THELMA M. MILLER, In and to said real property, shalt be terminated. Dated: i ... _ — 8 sz5 ELI X. umso9 13 14 • ii 15 la 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 -2- V � c cn � t ?' I I � s f ,I J i � r I i f 1 V � c cn � t ?' I I � s f ,I J i � r I MAY. 10. 1999. 2:38PM. CTC CUSTOMER SERVICE i i. i. t 3 2 3 N0, 6778 P, 4 PARCEL 53 ' 13819 An easement and right of way for the purpose of a sewer in, on, over, under and across a strip of land, 20.00 feet in width, being 4 a portion of the Southeast Ouarter of Section 8, Township 13 South, a Range 3 test, San Bernardino ease and Meridian, in the County of , 8 San Diego, State of California, according to the United States 9 Covsrrment Survey approved November 19, 1880, as shown on Record Of Survey No. 6011, and being ti.e 15.00 feet adjacent Northerly to 9 and 'the 5.00 feet adjacent Southerly to the following described 10 lines . 11 18 '• 13 14 18 18 17 18 19 20 21 83 u za ze Z7 28 } Beginning at a point in the Westerly line of Lot 4 in said Section 8, distant thereon South 01.03012' East 5.00 feet from the Northeast corner of Lot 25 of Rancho Las Encinitas, according to Map thereof No. 848, filed in the office of the County Recorder, June 27, 1896; thence North 87031133" East 72.92 feet; thence North 44 °15'00" East 75.78 feet to the _ beginning of a 500.00 -foot radius tangent curve, concave Southeasterly, hereinafter referred to as point "A "; thence Northeasterly along the are of said curve through a central angle of 44.7.7134 ", a distance of 387.98 feet, more or less, to a point in the Easterly line of said Lot 4, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North- easterly along the are of said curve through a central angle of 00.32'26 ", a distance of 74.53 feet to a point therein, distant the on through a central angle of 53000100 ", a distance of 462.51 feet from herainabove described Point "A "; thence tangent to said curve Eouth 82.45100` East 253.71 feet; thence North 61.45'00 ", East 197.31 feet to the beginning of • a 625.00 -foot radius tangent curve, concave Southerly; thence along the arc of said curve in an Easterly direction through a central angle of 45.45'00 ", a distance of 499.06 feet; thence South 72.30100" East 652.31 feet to A point in the arc of a 625.00 -foot radius curve, concave Southerly, the radial line to said point bears North 180301000 West; thence Easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 44.15'00 ", a distance of 482.69 feet; Lhence tangent to said curve South 64.15'00" East 168.84 feet to the beginning of a 625.00 -foot radius tangent curve; concave Northerly; thence Easterly along the are of said curve through a central angle of 35000100 ", a distance of 381.79 feet; thence tangent* to "aid curve North 80.45100" East 44.94 feet; thence South EXIIIDIT III', i I O 1 O <D r � l �O I i i I I I .MAY. 10. 1999 2 39PI CTC CUSTOMER SERVICE --NO. 6778_7 5 � • 51.00'00" East 107.u9 feet to a point in tale East line of a said Quarter Section distant thereon North 01.40`330 East 1136.12 feet from the Southeast corner of said Section t. a The sidelines of said strip of land shall be fcre- shortened or lengthened so as to terminate Westerly in said Nestorly line of said pna:ter Section, end 0 00 as to terminate Easterly in said Easterly lire of i said Quarter Section. r (Remainder of page not used) - a • 20 3 f 24 �• � as ... • I I , y EO i 97 ♦ I I za I CD ) tT� ' <D to i r [P[. S' t.• _MAY, 10. 1999 1 a 4 7 2:40PM' "' •CTC CUSTOMER SERVICE (( NO. 6778 P. 6 WITH the right, at arty time and from time to time, to remove any improvement, bush, tree, shrub, and other growth, and to locate, con- struct, maintain, patrol, clean, repair, alter, change the size of. Im- prove, reconstruct, replace, renew, relocate, and remove subsurface sewer or pipe lines and all other appliances, fixtures and 'appurtenances for use in connection therewith, and to temporarily store excavated mater- ial and construction equipment, and at r11 times, to use and operate said lines, appliances, fixtures and appurtenances, together with the right of access, Including the right to locate, construct, maintain, and use an access road, but without the right of ingress or egress to or from said strip of land in, upon, over or across the remaining larger parcel of .. , which said strip of land Is a part; provided however, that as soon as practicable after said construction and after 911 subsequent work, the our - f 'U face of said strip of land shall be restored to a smooth - graded condition 18 and all improvements affected thereby, such as fences, corrals, pipelines, f 16 I irrigation lines, roads and driveways shall be replaced; provided further, i 17 f that Compensation shall be paid for all damages occurring after said eon- 18 structton by reason of the exercise of the rights set forth herein. 19 RESERVING AND EXCEPTING the right to the use of said strip of land 80 for any purpose not adverse to or in interference of.said easement or $1 right of way, including but not limited to, cultivation for trees or ground Crops and construction. operation and maintenance of water, utility or En other lines on, above or below grade, gated fencing, parking, access roads 4 aed public streets according to engineering standards; but without the 25 right to erect any buildings or any other structures upon any portion of SO said strip of land, and without the right to make connections or openings fitto said subsurface sewer or pipe lines or into said appliances, fixtures " or appurtenances. A O � 1 r t I � n i 9 I 7 ' 1 t li I •0 • 0 10 u • 12 'r IS 2:40PM' "' •CTC CUSTOMER SERVICE (( NO. 6778 P. 6 WITH the right, at arty time and from time to time, to remove any improvement, bush, tree, shrub, and other growth, and to locate, con- struct, maintain, patrol, clean, repair, alter, change the size of. Im- prove, reconstruct, replace, renew, relocate, and remove subsurface sewer or pipe lines and all other appliances, fixtures and 'appurtenances for use in connection therewith, and to temporarily store excavated mater- ial and construction equipment, and at r11 times, to use and operate said lines, appliances, fixtures and appurtenances, together with the right of access, Including the right to locate, construct, maintain, and use an access road, but without the right of ingress or egress to or from said strip of land in, upon, over or across the remaining larger parcel of .. , which said strip of land Is a part; provided however, that as soon as practicable after said construction and after 911 subsequent work, the our - f 'U face of said strip of land shall be restored to a smooth - graded condition 18 and all improvements affected thereby, such as fences, corrals, pipelines, f 16 I irrigation lines, roads and driveways shall be replaced; provided further, i 17 f that Compensation shall be paid for all damages occurring after said eon- 18 structton by reason of the exercise of the rights set forth herein. 19 RESERVING AND EXCEPTING the right to the use of said strip of land 80 for any purpose not adverse to or in interference of.said easement or $1 right of way, including but not limited to, cultivation for trees or ground Crops and construction. operation and maintenance of water, utility or En other lines on, above or below grade, gated fencing, parking, access roads 4 aed public streets according to engineering standards; but without the 25 right to erect any buildings or any other structures upon any portion of SO said strip of land, and without the right to make connections or openings fitto said subsurface sewer or pipe lines or into said appliances, fixtures " or appurtenances. A O � 1 r t I � n i 9 I 7 ' 1 t li I j:.. -MAY. 10. 1999 2:41PM I r f" , i� ) �i CTC CUSTOMER SERVICE' O. 6778p10P. JPAARCEL 63 -A i3ai t' temporary construction easement and right of aav 1..j• �-,_ �. ;r.r �rGe an.< ross the hereinafter described pr operty for the ptc = t�- tr..ary race and construction of, sewer works. GETHER with the right to remove any impros•ement, br_sn, tree, shrub, other growth, and to store excavated matcar d constructfon eov <cn vided however, that upotermination of thin casernrnt and right of way, such construction equipment shall be removed, the s =rfnce shall be 0 restored to a smooth- graded condition, and all iaproverae-rs affected dlereby, such as fences, corals, pipelines, irrigation li^.es, roads and driveways shall be replaced_ lI The easement, right of way and rights herein described aha l become effective 13 upon the date of Final Judgment in Condemnation, or at any date prior thereto 14 upon which an order for immediate Possession or a right o: entry thereof is ' 18 seeursd, and shall cease and terminate On September 2B, 1F73• 16 The description of said property is as follows: 17 A strip of lard, 10.00 feet in width, Iyrng sa;acent 18 h'n"k fee to satd Parcel 53 and a strip of la_^c, 20.00 feet in width, lying adjacent Southerly to said 19 Parcel 53. E0 The sidelines of said strips of land S. 011 be foreshortened or lengthened so as to te- )nate 81 Westerly in said Westerly line of saSd Quarter Section, and so as to terminate Easter!; is said 88 Easterly line of said Quarter Section. ,83 (Remainder of page not used) so k7 Es o; o, .I 1 f` ! e• f" , i� ) �i CTC CUSTOMER SERVICE' O. 6778p10P. JPAARCEL 63 -A i3ai t' temporary construction easement and right of aav 1..j• �-,_ �. ;r.r �rGe an.< ross the hereinafter described pr operty for the ptc = t�- tr..ary race and construction of, sewer works. GETHER with the right to remove any impros•ement, br_sn, tree, shrub, other growth, and to store excavated matcar d constructfon eov <cn vided however, that upotermination of thin casernrnt and right of way, such construction equipment shall be removed, the s =rfnce shall be 0 restored to a smooth- graded condition, and all iaproverae-rs affected dlereby, such as fences, corals, pipelines, irrigation li^.es, roads and driveways shall be replaced_ lI The easement, right of way and rights herein described aha l become effective 13 upon the date of Final Judgment in Condemnation, or at any date prior thereto 14 upon which an order for immediate Possession or a right o: entry thereof is ' 18 seeursd, and shall cease and terminate On September 2B, 1F73• 16 The description of said property is as follows: 17 A strip of lard, 10.00 feet in width, Iyrng sa;acent 18 h'n"k fee to satd Parcel 53 and a strip of la_^c, 20.00 feet in width, lying adjacent Southerly to said 19 Parcel 53. E0 The sidelines of said strips of land S. 011 be foreshortened or lengthened so as to te- )nate 81 Westerly in said Westerly line of saSd Quarter Section, and so as to terminate Easter!; is said 88 Easterly line of said Quarter Section. ,83 (Remainder of page not used) so k7 Es o; o, .I 1 II-- .MAY. 10.1999- 2:41PM._,_..CTC CUSTOMER SERVICE.- IT OF OFFICIAL AECOADI 1 COUNTY.CALSP, A Urf.sLOOM OMAHA NO FEE i -,mwNO. 6778�,P. 8' to I a 4-, 31 9 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Jesse & Diana Oakley 2171 Pavilion Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Subject: Change of Soils Engineer Proposed Single Family Dwelling Remainder Parcel, Map No. 98 -139 Wildflower Estates Olivenhain, California APN 9264 -091 -68 AUG a 9 2001 I i 1 i f 9'rNL FENC.INTI(T February 23, 2001 Project No. CE -6286 References: 1.) "Report of Geotechnical Investigation ", Rancho de Mayo Subdivision, Tract 88 -351 RPL, Encinitas, California, prepared by Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. (SCT), dated May 24, 1989 2.) "Update Report", City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -139, Wildflower Drive, Encinitas, California, prepared by Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. (SCT), dated May 20, 1999 3.) "Update Letter ", prepared by North County Compaction Engineering, Inc., dated February 23, 2001 Dear Jesse & Diana Oakley: In response to your request, we respectfully submit the following information regarding the change of Soils Engineer. We, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC., have reviewed the above referenced soils reports. Subsequent to our review, we concur with findings, conclusions, and recommendations and are satisfied with the reports. We assume all responsibility within our purview as of February 23, 2001. We were contracted to provide soil testing and inspection services, to certify compliance with current standard practices regarding earthwork construction. P.O. BOX 302002 • ESCONDIDO, CA 92030 . (760)480 -1116 FAX (760)741 -6568 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6286 Page 2 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President RKA:paj cc: (3) submitted PpF E SSrp No. 71$ / z m w Exp. 9130/01 a CC. Dale R. Re r TFCHN pQ�'�P Registered Civ� � C � 3 Geotechnical Engineer 000713 �L UPDATE REPORT CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98-139 WILDFLOWER DRIVE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING 4407 MANCHESTER AVENUE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 p4cw ory (: ' PREPARED BY: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92120 Providing Professional Engineering Services Since 1959 AUG 0 9 2001 .S SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA T SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Street. San Diego, CA 92120 P0. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160 -0627 619 - 2804321. FAX 619- 280 -4717 May 20, 1999 San Dieguito Engineering 4407 Manchester Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 ATTENTION: Mr. Steve Crosby SCS &T 9911093.1 SUBJECT: Update Report, City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -139, Wildflower Drive, Encinitas, California. Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have prepared this update report for the subject project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject project will consist of a five lot residential subdivision, located at the south terminus of Wildflower Drive, in the City of Encinitas, California. The project consists of the development of four residential lots as well as associated utilities, and an access street. The fifth lot will be left unimproved. Grading will consist of cuts and fills up to about 24 feet. Proposed cut and/or fill slopes will be constructed at a 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter inclination, up to a maximum height of about 31 feet and 36 feet, respectively. To assist in the preparation of this report we were provided with a tentative parcel plan prepared by San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. dated December 18, 1998. In addition, we have reviewed the following reports prepared by Southern California Soil and Testing, Inca 1) "Rippability Analysis for Deep Sewer Trench, Rancho De Mayo Subdivision;" May 21, 1990. 2) 'Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Rancho De Mayo Subdivision, Tract 88 -351 RPL;" May 24, 1989. f Page No. 3 SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 CONCLUSIONS Based on our review of the aforementioned grading plan and reports, as well as a site reconnaissance, it is our opinion that the recommendations provided in the referenced geotechnical report are still applicable and should be implemented. The following additional recommendations are intended to provide updated recommendations where appropriate. The following recommendations take precedence over any conflicting recommendations contained in the referenced report. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS SELECT GRADING: Highly expansive soils should not be placed within a horizontal distance of ten feet from the face of fill slopes. SURFACE DRAINAGE: The drainage around the proposed buildings should be designed to collect and direct surface water away from proposed structures and the top of slopes toward approved draining facilities. Rain gutters on the structures that discharge runoff away from the building are recommended. The ground around the proposed structures should be graded so that surface water flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. In general, we recommend that the ground adjacent to structures slope away at a gradient of at least two percent. Densely vegetated areas where runoff can be impaired should have a minimum gradient of at least five percent within the first five feet from the structure. The client should be advised that drainage patterns approved at the time of fine grading should be maintained throughout the life of the proposed structures. They should also be advised to limit site irrigation to the minimum necessary to sustain landscape growth. Should excessive irrigation, impaired drainage, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones of perched groundwater conditions may occur. EARTHWORK: All earthwork and grading contemplated for site preparation should be accomplished in accordance with the attached Recommended Grading Specifications and Special Provisions. All special site preparation recommendations presented in the sections above will supersede those in the standard Recommended Grading Specifications. All embankments, structural fill and fill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction at or slightly over optimum moisture content. Utility trench backfill within five feet of the proposed structures and beneath SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Page No. 4 pavements should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its maximum dry density. The upper twelve inches of subgrade beneath paved areas should be compacted to 95 percent of its maximum dry density. This compaction should be obtained by the paving contractor just prior to placing the aggregate base material and should not be part of the mass grading requirements. The maximum dry density of each soil type should be determined in accordance with ASTM Test D- 1557 -91, Method A or C. SLOPE STABILITY Proposed cut and/or fill slopes will be constructed at a 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) inclination to a maximum height of about 31 feet and 36 feet, respectively. It is our opinion that these slopes will possess an adequate factor -of- safety with respect to deep- seated gross stability, provided that the recommendations contained in the aforementioned geotechnical report, and this report are implemented (see Plate Number 1). FOUNDATION HORIZONTAL SETBACKS: Retaining wall footings located adjacent to or within slopes should be extended to a depth such that a minimum horizontal distance of ten feet exists between the face of the slope and the bottom of the footing. CONCRETE SLAB REINFORCEMENT: Minimum concrete slab reinforcement should consist of at least No. 3 bars placed at 18 inches on center each way. EXPANSIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The recommendations contained in this report, and the referenced geotechnical report reflect a nondetrimentally expansive condition resulting from a select grading operation. If such an operation is not performed revised recommendations will be needed. EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES PASSIVE PRESSURE: The passive pressure for the prevailing soil conditions may be considered to be 350 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. This pressure may be increased by one -third for seismic loading. The coefficient of friction for concrete to soil may be assumed to be 0.3 for the resistance to lateral movement. When combining frictional and passive resistance, the latter should be reduced by one - third. The upper 12 inches of soil should not be included in passive pressure calculations. SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Page No. 5 If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. Daniel B- ----Adler, R.C.E. #360 DBA:mw cc: (6) Submitted I �r / 6 c� w Np:g6037 � EXi+. t490� FS SCS &T 991 1093.1 May 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 1 CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -139 WILDFLOWER DRIVE, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS - GENERAL PROVISIONS GENERALINTENT The intent of these specifications is to establish procedures for clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to be filled, and placing and compacting fill soils to the lines and grades shown on the accepted plans. The recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report and/or the attached Special provisions are a part of the Recommended Grading Specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. These specifications shall only be used in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which they are a part. No deviation from these specifications will be allowed, except where specified in the geotechnical report or in other written communication signed by the Geotechnical Engineer. OBSERVATION AND TESTING Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc., shall be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer to observe and test the earthwork in accordance with these specifications. It will be necessary that the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative provide adequate observation so that he may provide his opinion as to whether or not the work was accomplished as specified. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the Geotechnical Engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes and new information and data so that he may provided these opinions. In the event that any unusual conditions not covered by the special provisions or preliminary geotechnical report are encountered during the grading operations. The Geotechnical Engineer shall be contacted for further recommendations. If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Engineer, substandard conditions are encountered, such as questionable or unsuitable soil, unacceptable moisture content, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc.; construction should be stopped until the conditions are remedied or corrected or he shall recommended rejection of this work. Tests used to determine the degree of compaction should be performed in accordance with the following American Society for Testing and Materials test methods: Maximum Density & Optimum Moisture Content - ASTM D- 1557 -91 Density of Soil In -Place - ASTM D- 1556 -90 or ASTM D -2922 SCS &T 9911093. ] y r- Ma 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 2 All densities shall be expressed in terms of Relative Compaction as determined by the foregoing ASTM testing procedures. PREPARATION OF AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL All vegetation, brush and debris derived from clearing operations shall be removed, and legally disposed of. All areas disturbed by site grading should be left in a neat and finished appearance, free from unsightly debris. After clearing or benching the natural ground, the areas to be filled shall be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, brought to the proper moisture content, compacted and tested for the specified minimum degree of compaction. All loose soils in excess of 6 inches thick should be removed to firm natural ground which is defined as natural soils which possesses an in -situ density of at least 90 percent of its maximum dry density. When the slope of the natural ground receiving fill exceeds 20 percent (5 horizontal units to 1 vertical unit), the original ground shall be stepped or benched. Benches shall be cut to a firm competent formational soils. The lower bench shall be at least 10 feet wide or 1 -1/2 times the equipment width, whichever is greater, and shall be sloped back into the hillside at a gradient of not less than two percent. All other benches should be at least 6 feet wide. The horizontal portion of each bench shall be compacted prior to receiving fill as specified herein for compacted natural ground. Ground slopes flatter than 20 percent shall be benched when considered necessary by the Geotechnical Engineer. IAny abandoned buried structures encountered during grading operations must be totally removed. All underground utilities to be abandoned beneath any proposed structure should be removed from within 10 feet I� of the structure and properly capped off. The resulting depressions from the above described procedure should be backfilled with acceptable soil that is compacted to the requirements of the Geotechnical Engineer. This includes, but is not limited to, septic tanks, fuel tanks. sewer lines or leach lines, storm drains and water lines. Any buried structures or utilities no to be abandoned should be brought to the attention of the (, Geotechnical Engineer so that he may determine if any special recommendation will be necessary. All water wells which will be abandoned should be backfilled and capped in accordance to the requirements set forth by the Geotechnical Engineer. The top of the cap should be at least 4 feet below finish grade or 3 feet below the bottom of footing whichever is greater. The type of cap will depend on the diameter of the well and should be determined by the Geotechnical Engineer and/or a qualified Structural Engineer. ., SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 3 FILL MATERIAL Materials to be placed in the fill shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer and shall be free of vegetable matter and other deleterious substances. Granular soil shall contain sufficient fine material to fill the voids. The definition and disposition of oversized rocks and expansive or detrimental soils are covered in the geotechnical report or Special Provisions. Expansive soils, soils of poor gradation, or soils with low strength characteristics may be thoroughly mixed with other soils to provide satisfactory fill material, but only with the explicit consent of the Geotechnical Engineer. Any import material shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer before being brought to the site. PLACING AND COMPACTION OF FILL Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in layers not to exceed 6 inches in compacted thickness. Each layer shall have a uniform moisture content in the range that will allow the compaction effort to be efficiently applied to achieve the specified degree of compaction. Each layer shall be uniformly compacted to the specified minimum degree of compaction with equipment of adequate size to economically compact the layer. Compaction equipment should either be specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability. The minimum degree of compaction to be achieved is specified in either the Special Provisions or the recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report. When the structural fill material includes rocks, no rocks will be allowed to nest and all voids must be carefully filled with soil such that the minimum degree of compaction recommended in the Special Provisions is achieved. The maximum size and spacing of rock permitted in structural fills and in non- structural fills is discussed in the geotechnical report, when applicable. Field observation and compaction tests to estimate the degree of compaction of the fill will be taken by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative. The location and frequency of the tests shall be at the Geotechnical Engineer's discretion. When the compaction test indicates that a particular layer is at less than the required degree of compaction, the layer shall be reworked to the satisfaction of the Geotechnical Engineer and until the desired relative compaction has been obtained. Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. Compaction by sheepsfoot roller shall be at vertical intervals of not greater than four feet. In addition, fill slopes at a ratio of two horizontal to one vertical or flatter, should be trackrolled. Steeper fill slopes shall be over -built and cut -back to finish contours after the slope has been constructed. Slope compaction operations shall result in SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 4 all fill material six or more inches inward from the finished face of the slope having a relative compaction of at least 90 percent of maximum dry density or the degree of compaction specified in the Special Provisions section of this specification. The compaction operation on the slopes shall be continued until the Geotechnical Engineer is of the opinion that the slopes will be surficially stable. Density tests in the slopes will be made by the Geotechnical Engineer during construction of the slopes to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Where failing tests occur or other field problems arise, the Contractor will be notified that day of such conditions by written communication from the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative in the form of a daily field report. If the method of achieving the required slope compaction selected by the Contractor fails to produce the necessary results, the Contractor shall rework or rebuild such slopes until the required degree of compaction is obtained, at no cost to the Owner or Geotechnical Engineer. CUT SLOPES The Engineering Geologist shall inspect cut slopes excavated in rock or lithified formational material during the grading operations at intervals determined at his discretion. If any conditions not anticipated in the preliminary report such as perched water, seepage, lenticular or confined strata of a potentially adverse nature, unfavorably inclined bedding, joints or fault planes are encountered during grading„ these conditions shall be analyzed by the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer to determine if mitigating measures are necessary. Unless otherwise specified in the geotechnical report, no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than the allowed by the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency. ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Field observation by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative shall be made during the filling and compaction operations so that he can express his opinion regarding the conformance of the grading with acceptable standards of practice. Neither the presence of the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative or the observation and testing shall not release the Grading Contractor from his duty to compact all fill material to the specified degree of compaction. THOIGINAC OF THIS D3CLHENi WIS RECORDED ON FEP 09, 2001 When Recorded Mail To ) DOv" WNT HLKER 2001 - 0075995 G11GORY J. SMITH, 614TY READER And Recording Requested By: ) SAW DIEGO COIPTTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 9:15 AM City Clerk ) FEB 2 J 2001 City of Encinitas ) 505 S. Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE NOT APPROVED FOR DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (Section 66499.35 of the Government Code) IN COMPLIANCE: The Director of Community Development of the City of Encinitas has determined that the parcels of real property described below have been divided or have resulted from a division in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and with provisions of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code. The parcels described herein may be sold, leased, or financed without further compliance with the Subdivision Map Act or any local ordinance enacted pursuant to the Act. Development of the parcel may require issuance of a permit or permits, or other grant or grants of approval. Section 30.16.010 of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code specifies a minimum lot size of 2.0 acres, and minimum lot dimensions of 150 feet in depth and 110 feet in width for the subject RR (Rural Residential) zone. This Certificate of Compliance applies to one parcel, the Remainder Parcel of Parcel Map 18461. The subject lot, which has less area than the required minimum, was created by lot averaging in compliance with Municipal Code Section 30.16.020A, and may not be further subdivided. Owner/ Applicant: Jesse R. Oakley Description: (See Exhibit "A ", attached) Plat Map: (See Exhibit `B ", attached) NOTE: The descriptions in Exhibit "A" and Plats in Exhibit "B ", attached, have been provided by the owner of the property, and neither the City of Encinitas nor any of its officers or employees assume any responsibility for the accuracy of said descriptions or Plats. This Certificate of CompEance shall in no way affect the requirements of any City, C aunty, State, Federal or local agency that regulates development of rml property. Case No: 98 -139 TPM (see DCD 99 -07 on file in the Community DevelopmentDepartmeW) Assessor Parcel Number: 264- 091 -68 Date: February 5, 2001 BY: Bill We6dman, City Planner MIKKNA00- 279cc.doc 0 . ExhlbIt "A" SDE 4460 November 14, 2000 FILE: ...4460survl IegalsIRMDRPRCL.doc LEGAL DESCRIPTION REMAINDER PARCEL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PARCEL MAP NO. 18461 APN 264 - 019 -68 PARCEL B -1: PARCEL "REMAINDER" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18461, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 24, 2000. RESERVING THEREFROM AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO OVER, UNDER ALONG AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF SAID PARCEL "REMAINDER" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18461, SHOWN AND DESIGNATED THEREON AS "PROPOSED 40' PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT (WILDFLOWER DRIVE — PRIVATE STREET)" AND AN EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE DRAINAGE PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO OVER, UNDER, ALONG, AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF SAID "REMAINDER" PARCEL OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18461 SHOWN AND DESIGNATED THEREON AS "PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT'. PARCEL B -2: A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, OVER, ALONG AND ACROSS WILDFLOWER DRIVE BEING A PORTION OF SAID MAP NO. 12882 SHOWN THEREON AS "EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED HEREON", A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY FOR PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO TO BE USED IN COMMON WITH OTHERS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO EXTEND AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, DESCRIBED BELOW IN PARCELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE: PARCEL B -3: A STRIP OF LAND, 50.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 12882, SAID POINT LYING ON THE ARC OF A 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 °26'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 °18'44 "; THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS, SAID POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "X" OF THIS 1 OF 3 0 . DESCRIPTION. PARCEL B-4: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X", THENCE SOUTH 17 °52'02" WEST, 235.26 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 276.69 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 °50'40 "; THENCE SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 435.56 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT "Y" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 34 °58'38" EAST, 54.99 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 67 °40'35" WEST, 26.44 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 46.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 °51'11 "; THENCE SOUTH 76 °31'46" WEST, 147.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 79.19 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 °07'27 "; THENCE NORTH 88 °20'47" WEST, 317.86 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -5: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Y; THENCE NORTH 55 °01'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 55 °01'22" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 °58'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 177.53 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 211 °54'40" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 17.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50 °19'09" TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B-4 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 24 °56'51" WEST, 40.41 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B-4 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH BEARS SOUTH 16 °15'39" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 20.42 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 °30'02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 3.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 °45'08" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 958'05 "; THENCE NORTH 55 001'22" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B-4. PARCEL B -6: A STRIP OF LAND, 40.00 FEET IN WIDTH, TH - CENTERLINE OF SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "X", THENCE SOU -H 72 °07'58' EAST, 144.98 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 72.13 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 °19'54" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 430.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 371.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 °28'43 "; TO THE BEGINN;NG OF A REVERSE 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE 2OF3 8 . CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 132.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 °15'45 "; THENCE SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 172.29 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED AS POINT'Z" OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 58 °14'54" EAST, 40.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 °57'55" WEST, 161.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 120.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 218.64 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 104 °23'32 "; THENCE NORTH 77 °34'23" EAST, 64.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 1 °40'36" WEST, 20.62 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER THEREOF. THE SIDELINES OF SAID STRIP OF LAND TO BE PROLONGED OR SHORTENED SO AS TO TERMINATE EASTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER. PARCEL B -7: BEGINNING AT THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED POINT "Z"; THENCE NORTH 31 045'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 31 °45'06" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 151.25 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180 °32'18" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 23.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 66 "21'24" TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE; THENCE NORTH 62 °12'52" WEST, 44.44 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6 ABOVE, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 88 002'05" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 13.67 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 °0922" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 48.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 27.57 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32 °54'39" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 18.84 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53 058'05 "; THENCE NORTH 31 °45'06" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B-8: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -3 AND NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -3 AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. PARCEL B -9: THAT PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B-4 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -6 AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND TANGENT TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B-4 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B -6. EXCEPTING FROM THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PAR ;ELS B -3 THROUGH B -9 INCLUSIVE THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN THE HEREIN ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B -1. 3OF3 Exhibit "B" CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PLAT PARCF 3 3 // R1/ LU 0 Q� PARCEL 4 I Q 'PM ] 8461 g'20 �p is6c i 1 D s o. PARCEL 2 \ 20' —� 58 8g 10' PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER PM 18461 PARCEL MAP 18461 "REMAINDER PARCEL" 20' APN 264 - 091 -68 40' s Lo . s� ss�\F PARCEL 1 / a SCALE 1' - 60' PROPOSED 40' PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT PER PM 18461 95 CF i ..O a /s� T� A o qp SITE VIONI-� eW SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS PLANNERS - SURVEYORS Iv.n R. Fur, P.E. Its,, L. Munson, P.E. Gordon L. McElroy, P.LS. ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE 21- Feb -01 Laurie Simon, Principal Planner SIDE 4460 CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -139 REMAINDER PARCEL CIVIL ENGINEERING Emgnreng Sludr. APN 264 - 091 -68 Slw Deve4grmn, AUly,• GRADING PLAN 6809 -G Gmma Pl.m Impmvewn, Plw Drvmgc Pl.ns EXTENDED sr "° h.PI'n` ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNITCOST AMOUNT xydmugrnydr.wrr Comrmc,wn Adnunnwn,m EARTHWORK 2,200 CY $4.10 $9,020.00 Pa%c —i Rah.hdd.nun wrenrnL�gnee��g CONCRETE SWALE (D -75) 510 LF $13.65 $6,961.50 SAND BAGS 1,280 EA $1.50 $1,920.00 LAND PUNNING HYDROSEED 2,580 SF $0.11 $283.80 Re. A,u ... t. Mwlys,, 1y U- Cmwl..0 En•irunmcnul A.I,., (bvemnrm Rclnium la„d Divisism Tenmrve Maps M.lur Ur N.., srreloe pl.vs SUB -TOTAL $18,185.30 Reeoniry 10% CONTINGENCY $1,818.53 Admmrswnvc Nc ,aS Anmr mium TOTAL $20,003.83 Rom,dary Ad,usurrno LAND SURVEYING Pmpny Surveys Tnpognph,nl Surveys Cnnsoucmm Sukmg RmsNSUl Survey BARRY MUNSON RCE 40980 Legal Nwriprmns F ....m Q /Ie, lk,hl Ceninr.,mns �w L Cadasall Surveys PN„ngnnsmernc Sur,,S 3310 CIVILLnR�i (760) 753 -5525 a EA %(760) 943 -8236 4407 Manchester Avenue a Suite 105 a Encinitas, California 92024 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Jesse & Diana Oakley 2171 Pavilion Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Subject: Update Letter Proposed Single Family Dwelling Remainder Parcel Map No.98 -139 Wildflower Estates Olivenhain, California APN 9264 -091 -68 February 23, 2001 Project No. CE -6286 Reference: 1.) "Report of Geotechnical Investigation ", Rancho de Mayo Subdivision, Tract 88 -351 RPL, Encinitas, California, prepared by Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. (SCT), dated May 24, 1989 2.) "Update Report", City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -139, Wildflower Drive, Encinitas, California, prepared by Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. (SCT), dated May 20, 1999 3.) Project Grading Plans, prepared by San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. Dear Jesse & Diana Oakley: Per the request of the City of Encinitas, we have inspected the subject site and reviewed the above referenced soils reports for the purpose of providing updated recommendations with regard to the subject site. In addition, we are providing herein seismic design considerations required by the 1997 Uniform Building Code. It is our understanding, that the remainder parcel of Tract 98 -139 will require cut/fill earthwork construction to create a level building pad to accommodate the proposed single family dwelling. Cut and fill slopes will be constructed to approximate heights of 15 feet at inclinations of 2:1 horizontal to vertical units. P.O. BOX 302002 ' ESCONDIDO, CA 92030 " (760)480 -1116 FAX(760)741-6568 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6286 Page 2 Our site inspection of February 22, 2001 revealed that site and soil conditions remain as presented in the above referenced soils reports, therefore the recommendations contained in the reports should be incorporated into the design and construction phase of the subject project. Additional Updated Recommendations The building site is traversed by a north -south trending draw that will require filling during grading. Therefore, it is recommended a subdrain be constructed the length of the draw bottom to reduce water build up within the fill mass. All loose compressible top soils should be removed from the draw prior to constructing the drain. We should be contacted to inspect this condition prior to trenching the drain. We recommend that the subdrain be delineated on the project grading plan (Reference No. 3). Subdrain construction should consist of a 24 inch X 24 inch trench excavated into firm natural soil. The trench should be backfilled with i inch minus crushed rock with a 6 inch perforated pipe (holes down) placed at the center of the rock. The rock should be wrapped in filter fabric to reduce siltation of drain materials. All drains should have a minimum of one percent (1 %) fall toward their outlets. Seismic Design Considerations (Soil Parameters) A.) Soil Profile = SD (Table 16 -J of the 1997 Uniform Building Code) B.) Type `B" Fault (Rose Canyon) C.) Distance = Greater than I 1 km (California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology [maps] in conjunction with Tables 16 -S and 16 -T of the 1997 Uniform Building Code) The soils engineer declaration on the project grading plan should indicate that we have reviewed the above referenced soils reports by SCT. It should also reference this update letter as well. Upon completion of grading plans to be submitted, we would like to review them to assure compliance to recommendations set forth. NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6286 Page 3 If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President RKA:paj cc: (3) submitted QROFESS/ R. AFC�9�F � � z No. 713 �= z Ex . 9130101 m Dale R. Re y OT�CHN�pPP Registered Geotechnical En 3 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS PLANNERS StI R%E yl1 RS Ivan P- Fob, P.E. Barry L. Muruoa, P.E. Gordon L. McE6or, P.L.S. Laurie Simon, Principal PWalaer CIVIL ENGINEERING Sgu Oeveku rtt Analysis Grading Plw Impmvemem Rw Drainage Plana S rMhler Line Plan, HydrologymyM li C..,,on ALmniawian Pavemem R.ItSNlitalian I..,. Enpmadng "NO PLANNING Pre- Acgts%Pt nASWyau Ertl U. Cnwrllxion Envnannrnul Amly,is GovrmnKnl Relauau Wd Divisron Tenmive Meps ma. "e<Prm.i" Spmi6c PIw Reoom6 varlmcea Adminialnuive Pesmiu Am¢xuiuna 13.0ttry Ad,....... Pmpcny S."Ys TapgnpAkal Surveys Canlrutim SraE,ng Rme s Survey Lied DeY(IPIInee Subdivisan Maq �aee.m, W"N CenxK. ., Cadaural Surveys PM1doyrammcmc Sur Ya February 21, 2001 City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 S. Vulcan Encinitas, CA 92024 Subject: Hydrology/Hydraulic Study APN 264 - 091 -68 Gentlemen; �vs SDE 4460 FEB 2 8 2001 As part of the requirements for the referenced grading plan, we have prepared a Hydrologic/Hydraulic study for the subject site. Our study consisted of reviewing Hydrology/Hydraulic Study for TPM 98 -139, prepared by San Dieguito Engineering, Inc., dated October 16, 1999, field observing existing onsite and offsite conditions, and performing hydrologic and hydraulic calculations. This site is the remainder parcel of TPM 98 -139 and development of this lot was anticipated in that report. HYDROLOGY Hydrologic calculations were performed for the basin as shown on the attached hydrology map. Q's were determined by the County of San Diego Rational Method and are presented on the attached Hvdrologv Calculations worksheet. A 10 minute time of concentration was used in accordance with the recommendations for simple small watersheds in the Caltrans Highway Design Manual in calculation of the site Q. HYDRAULICS Runoff from this site will be collected in a 24" concrete ditch as shown on the plan and directed into the existing type F catch basin per 6062 -G. This catch basin was designed with an opening provided to accept this anticipated flow. This catch basin discharges into an existing 30" rcp storm drain per 6062 -G. (760) 753 -5525 a FAx (760) 943 -8236 4407 Manchester Avenue • suite 105 a Encinitas, California 92024 Hydraulic calculations for the existing storm drain per 6062 -G were performed using Flowmaster software by Haestad Methods. Based upon our analysis, the existing drainage system per 6062 -G will perform adequately under 100 year storm runoff, and no drainage structures will be required to be constructed or replaced for the proposed development. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Thank you, Barry L. Munson, PE Senior Civil Engineer PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: COMMENT: APN 264- 091 -68 4460.00 COORD: N33 -03 E117 -13 SOIL GROUP: D 100 YEAR STOPM P6 (in): 3.00 P6/P24: 0.60 P24 (in): 5.00 ADJUSTED P6: 3.00 ATERSHED EVENT AREA AREA C Tc I Q DESIGNATIO ear s Ac min i h Ids) TOTAL SITE: 100.00 88732 2.04 0.45 10.0 5.00 Q100= 4.59 M&O" BROW DITCH Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File untitled.fm2 Worksheet Brow Ditch (max 0, Min Slope) Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning s Formula Solve For Channel Uepth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.015 Channel Slope 0.010000 fUft Diameter 24.00 in Discharge 4.59 cfs 4 Results Depth 0.66 ft — — FlowArea 0.90 ft' Wetted Perimeter 2.44 ft Top Width 1.88 ft Critical Depth 0.75 ft Percent Full 32.92 Critical Slope 0.006021 ft/ft Velocity 5.09 ft/s Velocity Head 0.40 ft Specific Energy 1.06 ft Froude Number 1.30 Maximum Discharge 21.09 cfs Full Flow Capacity 19.61 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.000548 ft1ft Flow is supercritical. Q lea C FA- --,IAJ A, a /\151 -r�e- + O Fps rTE 4. S9 eF-S � Z�4 12/14/00 FlowMaster v5.11 07'.34'.29 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury. CT 05708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 NORMAL DEPTH Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File cntitled.fm2 Worksheet CHECK EXIST. 30" RCP PER 6062 -G Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Chanr el Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.010000 ft/ft Diameter 30.00 in Discharge 3714 cfs Results Depth 1.86 ft Flow Area 3.92 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 5.21 ft Top Width 2.18 ft Critical Depth 2.06 It Percent Full 74.55 Critical Slope 0.008099 ft/ft Velocity 9.46 ft/s Velocity Head 1.39 ft Specific Energy 3.26 It Froude Number 1.24 Maximum Discharge 44.12 cfs E— Full Flow Capacity 41.01 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.008200 ft/ft Flow is supercritical. �� 9g.13J (q= 32. SS + 4 S.9 = 37 14 C>-5 3 7/¢ 643 L¢ 4 I Z CFS Ole 12114/00 FlowMaster v5.11 07:36:36 AM Haestad Methods. Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 o11 CRITICAL DEPTH Worksheet for Circular Channel Projeut Description Projec, File untitled.fm2 Worksheet CHECK EXIST 30" RCP PER 6062 -G Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.008099 ft/ft Diameter 30.00 in Discharge 3714 cfs Results Depth 2.06 ft Flow Area 4.33 ft' Wetted Perimeter 5.70 ft Top Width 1.90 ft Critical Depth 2.06 ft Percent Full 82.54 Critical Slope 0.008099 ft/ft Velocity 8.57 ft/s Velocity Head 1.14 ft Specific Energy 3.20 ft Froude Number 1.00 Maximum Discharge 39.71 cfs Full Flow Capacity 36.91 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.008200 ft/ft Flow is subcritical. C /�T.IG 0�9i1 GJC E�a'I ST. %L/Q&" V 2/ .%C F CAILN &:bm-/ /JE7z 1vU62- �s L Z. o& +(l.5f0," ll 3.77 ?V v J 2 °s,-�3+ &-77 = Zoq,So 21m cL s 11/30100 FlowMaster v5.11 10:41:42 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1568 Page 1 of 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS (RATIONAL METHOD) LAND USE ,Undeveloped Residential: Rural Single Family Multi -Units Mobile Homes (2) Commercial (2) 80% Impervious Industrial (2) 90% Impervious Coefficient, C Soil ) A B C .30 35 .40 .30 .35 .40 40 .45 .50 45 .50 .60 4S .50 .55 70 .75 .80 .80 .85 .90 D .45 45 55 70 .65 .85 95 NOTES: (1) Obtain soil group from maps on file with the Department of Sanitation and Flood Control. (2) Where actual conditions deviate significantly from the tabulated imperviousness values of 80% or 90 %, the values given for coefficient C, may be revised by multiplying 80% or 90% by the ratio of actual imperviousness to the tabulated imperviousness. However, in no case shall the final coefficient be less than 0.50. For example: Consider commercial property on D soil group. Actual imperviousness = 50% Tabulated imperviousness = 800 Revised C = 50 X. 0.85 = 0.53 APPENDIX IN '' 10 V INTENSITY- DURATION DESIGN CHART P6 D sity Precipitation (In. ion (min.) 15 20 30 40 50 1 2 Minutes niir,tinn (lours L" sill o, °e +6.0 �5.5 -� 5.0 j4.5 , ; 3.0 ,un2.5 3 4 5 6 .0 1.5 .0 (Directions for Application: 1) From precipitation reaps determine 6 hr. and 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrolog; Manual (10, 50 and 100 yr. maps included in t Design and Procedure Manual). 2) Adjust 6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr. precipitation. (Not applicable to Desert) 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on the right s of the chart. 4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines. 5) This line is the intensity- duration curve for the location being analyzed. Application Form: 0) Selected Frequency r. 1) P6 ° 3 1n., P24= , *P6 = 60 %* P24 2) Adjusted *P6= .�, O in. 3) t - _ /V min. 4) I - in /hr. *Not Applicable to Desert Region APPENDIX XI IV -A -15 ncvkod 1 /85 of I�� :D��pIIIiIi on�i 10M NION 15 20 30 40 50 1 2 Minutes niir,tinn (lours L" sill o, °e +6.0 �5.5 -� 5.0 j4.5 , ; 3.0 ,un2.5 3 4 5 6 .0 1.5 .0 (Directions for Application: 1) From precipitation reaps determine 6 hr. and 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrolog; Manual (10, 50 and 100 yr. maps included in t Design and Procedure Manual). 2) Adjust 6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr. precipitation. (Not applicable to Desert) 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on the right s of the chart. 4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines. 5) This line is the intensity- duration curve for the location being analyzed. Application Form: 0) Selected Frequency r. 1) P6 ° 3 1n., P24= , *P6 = 60 %* P24 2) Adjusted *P6= .�, O in. 3) t - _ /V min. 4) I - in /hr. *Not Applicable to Desert Region APPENDIX XI IV -A -15 ncvkod 1 /85 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 100 -YEAR 24 -1.101 R PRECIPITATION DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION b, 1 FLOOD CONTROL '-20ASOPLUUTALS Or 100 -YEl1R 24 -HOUR PRECIPITATI011 11•1 -Et-ITHS OF AN INCH 451 .` , . •.1T _ — • -rM�i� � e1 � ��1 �' 100 �!Pl�o S�r \ �— ,cnHU e l - s 135 'l1iY�•1D ' I s ^C 1 60 141 cL. AG lu — — SAN CL MENiE • 4.r 1 ` 1 100 V10 1 \IUU 5 �( I y� { /i'•. `] Q ~ \�\?�J 151 0� I AN51111. I — 40 \L�Li I v IA lion. 1,125 SIX if �1 S ,' t t��1 . c 45' 2L Ir 1 rf 100 -- -- BO Prop. -a eF J - U.S. DEPARTMEN I' OF COMMERCE 10.,1\�� La. „Cur. lA �•. D4 5q I NATIONAL OCEANIC AND AT 05r119RIC ADMINISTRATION J 6311U +JO 'i SPECIAL STUDIES BRANCH.OFFICB Of II ONOLOGY, NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SA •'• 0-10 300 D 10° — � .. "q 15�GU 301 i lfl" 11i' 30' 1 ,' 117" )1,; 116" CODUTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION E FLOOD CONTROL 451 i 151 r- 330 I - 100 -YEAR 6 -11OU I PRECIPITATION ' 20-./ ISOPI_UVIALS OF 160 -YEAR 6 -11OUR PRECIPi i i'►TIGN IN ENTIIS OF AN N.CII 5'J ILI ELSI 1 \ � A BIAC.II SAN Cl MENTE 30 4 I o SATE AIAfl` , 451 P.epa rd by U.S. DEPARTMEN I' OF COMMERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND AT. OSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION BPEC1AL ETVDIES BRANCH. OFFICE OF 11 UROLOGY. NATIONAL WEATHER 7ERVICE 301 1181 451 j01 151 L 1170 ' \\r ` RD 27.5 L,, Flo 1151 301 MECCA I 1 r 151 1160 �.. �m 'tea l HYDROLOGY MAP - "APN 264- 091 -68" ix PARCEL 1' n y / ,� 4/ ( I 1.21 OS 0 r _ 1.63 AC. GROS °V I �.L� .0� AC.^� ' „o f'36 AC NET 23,832 P D \AR D ELE 212.(1 1 �� \ 'PAD AR A 28,342 S� ,i � I Q , - ` L . PARCEL 2 29 C S � 1 A0. PAD L = 215 I HYDROLOGY OVERT KEY EY MAP I �� - --PAD 31,712 SF scALE: 1 ° =3DD F DRAINAGE LEGEND Ft m.O FILL SLOPE_ V �� V 10. A� AlPN X1-091 88 CUT SLOPE 'V ' A 1.79 AC. GROS �'1 �,•' - as �' V 1.64AC. PROJECT BOUNDARY PAD EL = 'o / - - -- - - BASIN BOUNDARY _ .— - _ -- ...._ -. -�, \ �• ,� \ PAD 9 SF Q / �`l A EP0 1f? RAT l bk _ 7604 i; i _� _ `F F ''F DRAINAGE BASIN - T2 G &E NT E / ?b'0 A V 2 L 14 5.�D2 PER DOC# 83 55102 / �2 i a r.9r„ AREA IN ACRES \ 165 I CAILQ 100 -YR STORM RUNOFF p .. \ P9D EL = gi4 _ � I i A0. NET \ 1 SAN ENGINEERING, ENGERING, ING 4407 M4NCHE51'ER. SUrtE 105 I ` � � ` r i ENCINRAS 1 92024 \ t \ PHONE: (760) 753 -5525 CIVIL ENGIPEEFM • PLANNING SCALE 1" = 50' - LAND SURVEYING Q, ec__ - _ _ -rte ��•. _ �` ': A _ 446D /HYDR LOGY- P. ME, SG E 1• =50•, DATE: 11/22/DO N ® O. A460 iiBSH, ret+a ,�•� �'"w'+E� ° � ,a� � at'�i"aoI °� vPtn/ -hirl License Detail ht tp : / /www2.cslb.ca.gov /iXpress/CS ...License +Detail.DML ?LicNum =+ +677801 _C tail .. GWFORIM COWRACTIMS STATE LICENSE BOARD Contractor License # 677801 DISCLAIMER The license status information shown below represents information taken from the CSLB licensing data base at the time of your inquiry. It will not reflect pending updates which are being reviewed for subsequent data base updating. The available information may not reflect any civil or criminal judgments or actions that have not been reported to the CSLB. If there are disclosable complaints (legal actions) on the contractor's license, that information will be provided. If you intend to pursue any kind of legal action, insure you get a "Verified Certificate" which is a certified license history covering a specific time period prior to taking any action. * * * BUSINESS INFORMATION * * * CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS CORPORATION POBOX6 EL CAJON, CA 92022 Business Phone Number: (619) 596 -3270 Corporation late: 09/23/1993 Expire Date: 09/30/2001 * * * LICENSE STATUS * * * license is current and active. * * * CLASSIFICATIONS GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR * * * CERTIFICATIONS HOME IMPROVEMENT CERTIFICATION * * * CONTRACTOR BONDING INFORMATION * * * license has bond number 133950C in the amount of $7,500 with the bonding company EMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA. ;tive Date: 07/01/1994 * * * WORKERS COMPENSATION INFORMATION * * * license has workers compensation insurance with the INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE Number: WSD1678861 Effective Date: 07/01/1999 Expire Date: 07/01/2000 1 of 1 5/112000 2:29 PM License Detail http:/ /www2.cslb.ca.gov /iXpress /CS... License +Detail.DML ?LicNum =+ +467299 _ CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BOARD Contractor License # 467299 DISCLAIMER The license status information shown below represents information taken from the CSLB licensing data base at the time of your inquiry. It will not reflect pending updates which are being reviewed for subsequent data base updating. The available information may not reflect any civil or criminal judgments or actions that have not been reported to the CSLB. If there are disclosable complaints (legal actions) on the contractor's license, that information will be provided. If you intend to pursue any kind of legal action, insure you get a "Verified Certificate" which is a certified license history covering a specific time period prior to taking any action. * * * BUSINESS INFORMATION * * * G F WHILLOCK GRADING & EXCAVATING 1298 DISTRIBUTION WAY VISTA, CA 92083 Business Phone Number: (760) 599 -6800 Sole Ownership Date: 12/26/1984 Expire Date: 12/31/2000 * * * LICENSE STATUS * * * license is current and active. * * * CLASSIFICATIONS GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR 12 EARTHWORK AND PAVING 21 BUILDING MOVING, DEMOLITION * * * CONTRACTOR BONDING INFORMATION * * * is license has bond number SA5040397 in the amount of $7,500 with the bonding company AR INSURANCE COMPANY. ective Date: 01101/1996 * * * WORKERS COMPENSATION INFORMATION * * * license has workers compensation insurance with the REPUBLIC INDEMNITY 4PANY OF CALIFORNIA y Number: 03085305 Effective Date: 01/01/2000 Expire Date: 01101/2001 o I of 1 5/1/2000 2:28 PM Ivan It. F... P.E. Barn L. Munson, P.E Gordon L. McElroy, P.I.S. Irurk Simon, Principal Planner CIVIL ENGINEERING Fn, nne Swdie, 9u Dc,elnpmem Analysis Gm.ng Plans Improvrmrm Plans Drainage Mane Sewer/Wnrr hnc PI... Hydrology0iydraulics C... Adm,m11n0. Paremem RChshdoalo Forms. Fngineenng LAND PLANNING Pre AcqulUaon AnaMys Land U,e Consulwion FnvumnKm.l A,ulvrn G,nmmcm Rdanm, Land Dmiwon Tenulire Maps Major U. Prnnn' SPecde Plane Rezoning Van., Adminisuauve Pemul, Annraalion, Boundary Adluslmrnu LAND SURVEYING Pn,eny Surveys Topogrfphical Surveys C...... Sohmg Record, oI S.r," Lela! Descnpdns Suhdrvialan Maq g.ermenu He,ghlCmifcaliom CWawal Surrey' ma.ognmrrcvic Surreys t aaala AN S DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -139 GRADING PLAN 6075 -G ITEM QUANTITY UNIT 25- Oct -99 SDE 4460 EXTENDED UNIT COST AMOUNT EARTHWORK 25,300 CY $4.10 $103,730.00 CONCRETE SWALE 730 LF $13.65 $9,964.50 AC DOWNDRAIN 1 EA $500.00 $500.00 SAND BAGS 3,750 EA $1.50 $5,525.00 HYDROSEED 36,300 SF $0.11 $3,993.00 RIP RAP 15 CY $150.00 $2,250.00 SUB -TOTAL $126,062.50 10% CONTINGENCY $12,606.25 TOTAL $138,668.75 BARRY L. MUNSON RCE 40980 L Glaaa`a" 3 —1 (760) 753 -5525 a Fm (760) 943 -8236 4407 Manchester Avenue • Suite 105 a Encinitas, California 92024 IVI BARRY L. MUNSON RICE 40980 (760) 753 -5525 • FAX (760) 943 -8236 4407 Manchester Avenue • Suite 105 • Encinitas- California 92024 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERINGiI. �. ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURV 'I Ivan R. Fox, P.E. _ Barry 1.. Munson. P.E. ILIL- Cordon L. McEImY, P.L.S. 1,aurie Simon, Principal Planner ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE 11-Oct -99 CIVIL ENGINEERING SDE 4460 engin<edng swdm. CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -139 sim peveluprrcm Avlyus OW,n, Plans GRADING PLAN 6062 -G WILDFLOWER DRIVE PRIVATE ROAD ropm.rm n,PI.., D,umgr PI... 5<werM'n<r Lin %ma Hydml"gynlyone.k> EMENDED C..nmruonAmm.iur.n.n ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST AMOUNT Prv<,rcm Rchahihunon Farc.or Engimrring EXPORT 1,170 CY $8.60 $10,062.00 EARTHWORK 2,300 CY $4.10 $9,430.00 LAND PLANNING TYPE F CATCH BASIN 2 EA $3.400.00 $6.800.00 Prc- Aryuiai,an Amlyas TYPE B -1 INLET 4 EA $3,500.00 $14,000.00 E u><C..awmwn En.n,n,n<.,.IAnayaia TYPE A HEADWALL 2 EA $2,200.00 $4,400.00 G.remmem Rdn'..v AC STRUCTURAL SECTION 15.700 SF $2.55 $40.035.00 Iand Division ROLLED CURB 1,488 LF $13.75 $20,460.00 T,.mire M., 6" AC DIKE 79 LF $8.20 $647.80 M. "ir0"I' <"N15 18" STORM DRAIN 290 LF $84.00 $24.360.00 sp«,Ba PI.n> 24" STORM DRAIN 258 LF $95.00 $24,510.00 30" STORM DRAIN 170 LF $110.00 $18,700.00 V.ro., SAND BAGS 760 EA $1.50 $1.140.00 Admin „Inn >r fs, nt> HYDROSEED 2,110 SF $0.11 $232.10 Anrcaa,,... Bwnelvy Adju>,menu 8” WATER MAIN 976 LF $31.00 $30,256.00 BLOW OFF 1 EA $1,100.00 $1.100.00 LAND SURVFYING WATER LATERAL 5 EA $1,300.00 $6,500.00 g*o,eny suneys FIRE HYDRANT 2 EA $2,800.00 $5,600.00 T.p.g,Vhwals.Neyv AIR RELEASE 1 EA $850.00 $850.00 Convuunron S,.ung BARRICADE 1 EA $420.00 $420.00 Rermdanrsnr>rr RIP RAP 50 CY $150.00 $7,500.00 I"pl Ucunplrom DRIVEWAY APRON 515 SF $3.95 $2.034.25 SuNlni.ron Mepr Faum<nu Hclgh, C,rorc.,iu.s C.e.ur.l Snrreyv SUB -TOTAL $229,037.15 Phnogr.mmemc surrey: 10% CONTINGENCY $22,903.72 TOTAL $251,940.87 BARRY L. MUNSON RICE 40980 (760) 753 -5525 • FAX (760) 943 -8236 4407 Manchester Avenue • Suite 105 • Encinitas- California 92024 Ivan R. Faas P.E. Bam L. Monson, P.E. Gordon L. McElroy, P.L.S. Lauri Simon, Principal Planner CIVIL ENGINEERING Englmm�g s„d�r: Sim p<•dnpn,cm Andy", Grading Plans Impm•c,nn Plans Drunage Maio Sr,a<rM'aer Lin Plan, HydmlogV,Yly,o ulla C ... noclim Admmnuaoun Pavrmrn, R<handnauon Farm,¢ E.ngmrrnng SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -139 SEWER IMPROVEMENT PLAN CS -315 15- Sep -99 SIDE 4460 EXTENDED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST AMOUNT LAND PUNNING 8" SEWER MAIN 768 LF $60.00 $46,080.00 Pm- ANuiufion A,ulyns MANHOLE 3 EA $3,000.00 $9,000.00 E-and Us< Cana,mannn CLEANOUT 3 EA $500.00 51,500.00 RnvnunmcnlalAnlysu SEWER LATERAL 5 EA $577.00 S2,885.00 ('o —nam Rda„om Vxi Divnion Trn.,, <Maps Mats Use P<mu,s S} irr Plans Rrrvning Vannes AJmin,'.'.'e N.", SUB -TOTAL $59,465.00 Boundary Adjusnnnu 10% CONTINGENCY $5,946.50 LAND SURVEYING Mopeny svrv<ya TOTAL $65,411.50 TusagraphKal Surveys C°ns,na,,. Sao, R<ro,ds of Survey Engel Dascdplmns Suhdlvuinn Maq Eixnrnu IErighl Cm,k.o.na Cadanral Survrya Yhxogrammrv,c Survrys�� BARRY L. MUNSON RCE 40980 ' 3 31 63 (760) 753 -5525 • FAx (760) 943 -8236 4407 Manchester Avenue a Suite 105 • Encinitas, California 92024 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS Ivan R. Fox, P.E. Barry L. Mum., P.F.. Gordon 1.. McElnn. P.I.. S. Laurie Simon, Principal PWnnec CIVIL ENGINEERING F.ngm«nng Swd,n Shf Dev6o .n A.IY .1 GrMing Plw En pmverrrenr Plans Dmnage Ran. SeverPNoter Lira Plana Hydmlogyalydnulic. Cm. im Admin%,nanm Pavemnu Rehaeimalwn Formic Engimcnng LAND PLANNING Prt A,.,.YOn Amllul WN Ure Coruullauun Emimnnnnul ArulYul Govcmrmm Rdaum. LAM Dlvisim Tenuuve Maps Myw Um Pemuu Sndr Ple- Re+ Ing Varonas Admmi.uative Pnmrn Anm.arrnru Boundary Ad,..." LAND SURVEYING Popeny surveys Topographical Survq, Conuum tnn Sexing Records or Su , URal Dexripu. SYldivlsim Maps E.m..aa Height Cerureniom Cadaatral Surveil Phnmgrar we Su,v.Y. September 15, 1999 City of Encinitas Subdivision Engineering 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 Attn: Blair Knoll RE: TPM 98 -139 % � I % AQ SEP `� sEP��s s The bond amount for monumentation of TPM 98 -139 needs to be $1000.00. Sincer ly, A ( ordon L. McElroy L.S. 4306 CAJdataVetters \monbond_enc. wpd • Exp. C� 4" pi? No. ��a(rS� R OF C (760) 753 -5525 • FAx (760) 943.6236 4407 ManchesicT Avenue • Suite 105 • Encinitas. California 92024 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 TRANSMITTAL FORM FAX: 633 -2818 Community Development Engineering Fire Administration Fire Prevention Public Works DATE: /D SEND TO FAX p 9�3- 8236 TO: 5fc cn Ciro sb / 3 COMPANY: /� DIEGUi1a ENl�I.vE�ieIN6 ('�' PP ARCHED FROM: 7�DD aAU/r1,r3ACN PHONE: 6}9!633- 2786 ❑ Review & Call ❑Review &Return ❑ F.Y.I. ❑ Call ASAP ❑ Please Handle ❑ Per our Convcrsation 1 Am S ENDialV C,nu the aC-K iz ow Scz� I�l� mU�ST lvou& N/Co y rT W OULo ❑ Please Reply bye ❑ As Requested 74 h e'l TEm 6x/7-s T gE o K_ MUM 7b0/J' SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS PE AN NE RS SURVIVORS Ican R. Fox, P.E. Barry L. Monson, P.E. Gordon L. McElroy, P.L.S. Laurie Simon, Principal Planner CIVIL ENGINEERING En,ocennR slW ' Sar ncv —nl Anai, Grading Plans Impmvcwnt Mato Drunasr Plan, SevcrM'alcr Line Plans Hydmlopy/Hy&%uhcs Con,wrsion Adminn. ion Pavcmrns Rehabilitation Fomnnc Enelnecnnr LAND PLANNING Rn, Acl.,0000 Ana],,, l Use COnsulUUoo Ea, nc.n anal Amlvsis Govemmem 0.dauons Lana Dn,,,on Trntau. Maps Major U. Prmiu Spcciac Plan, 0.rzonmg v.n,nee, Admin„vanv< PCmuu Anneanions B.ur Adlu,Imrnl, LAND SURVEYING Propene Surveys Top,,,, ical Surveys Consmsnm SU nE Rcc , of Survey opal Descnpiom Subdinsion Maps Fisen,cnn 116'htCaUr aUnns CaauualSwvcys Plnu,gramrrcRic Sweys October 17, 2002 SDE 4460 City of Encinitas Engineering Services 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Subject: Pad Certification Reference: City of Encinitas Grading Plan 6809 -G Attention: Mr. Masih Maher, PE Mr. Maher; This is to verify that San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. has surveyed the elevation of the building pad for the above referenced project. Plan Elevation 222 Surveyed Elevation 222.8 If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thank you, H Steven R. Crosby P.E. Senior Associate Engineer San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. U1l datalengineeringt44 _wildllo"r\wrtslpad certification 4460rem wpd R NO. 41M LIP. 3.31 -01 \CIYI%/ (760) 753.5525 a FAx (760) 9438236 4407 Manchester Avenue a Suite 105 a Encinitas. California 92024 SAN DIEGUIM ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS Ivan R. Foa, P.E. Harry L. Munson, P.E. Cordon L. McElroy, P.L.S. Laurie Simon, Principal Planner CIVIL ENGINEERING October 21, 2002 SDE 4460 Exi,ncirr, S, W,,, Sn, Developnani Analysis City of Encinitas GMng Plans Engineering Services Permits lmpov,m,ni Plans 505 S. Vulcan Avenue D ,.,Plan, Encinitas, CA 92024 S %E16NVocr Line Plans aynmmptN.enamics Subject: Engineer's Pad Certification Cons.1ion AMtin,avalm Pav,m,nl R,NMliuuon Reference: Project No. 98 -139 remainder parcel, and Grading Permit No. 6809 -G Forensic En,neednE Pursuant to section 23.24.310 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a LAND PUNNING Pad Certification Letter for remainder parcel of Project No. 98 -139. As the Engineer of Record for Pne ACq noisnAnalysis the subject project, I hereby state rough grading for these units has been completed in conformance Ivd U "cons"' ""on with the attached plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. En.iranmcnul Analysis DOVeTme"Re'"'oa` 23.24.310 (B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the Lan] a "sxoa approved grading plan: Ten.,, Ma,s f1r Myw Us, Pemms 5p,,,r, Plam Pad Elevation Pad Elevation � rVyW Reeunln, Parcel no. Per plan Per field measurement GZ ^��` ! ',(,� /� vai,nee, Rem. Parcel 222.0 222.8 1 �l�f 2 1 gdminiauaive Permuls Annevau,ns Bcass yAdloelm,nl, LAND SURVEYING 23.24.310 (B) 1. Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices and /or retaining Pmpeny Surreys wall have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. Topognphael Surr,ys Camu,snian SUkinE 23.24.310 (B) 5. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and Re,onlao/san.ey are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. Leal Dexriplians sundirissanM., 23.24.310 (B) 6. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been F n.n's field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. neieni eegir aiana cala,val sar,eys Sincerely, Pholapramm,vic Surveys �o 'SS/ A•`r'A It CP 4�i iri Steven R. Crosby P.E. K 41975 Senior Associate Engineer p► 3_31_03 air engineering \4433 \letters \pad certification 4460rem.wpd lf, CIVIL ^�' as. (760) 753 -5525 • FAX (760) 943.8236 4407 Manchester Avenue - Suite 105 • Encinitas, California 92024 Ivan R. Fox, P.E. Barn L. Munson, P.F.. Gordon L. McElroy, P.L.S. Laurie Simon, Prineipal Planner CIVIL ENGINEERING Ent,laemn6 SaMiea Sim Dsvelogmena Analysis Grading Plana Imp,ovcmcnl Raps Ihalmgc Ran, R.arM'amr Line Plans HydmlugyMydrmlin CamVUrlion AdnumelNion Pnvnwm RehaWnitt nn Foren,ac Esl ,rcrnng LAND PLANNING Re -A,i isioon Analysis UM Use Conailulion Envimnmenul Analysis Goa <mmcnl Relations Wad M,isaon Tmuu•<Maps Maur GY Pentiu SI*nnr Plans Pun ,ng va iirco Adminiswlivc Pcrmiln Anwailions Boua Bar, Adlualmenu LAND SURVEYING Pngcny Surveys ToP, Whral Sur.cy. Cal„ Inlrlion Slating R-oads of Survey Legal D npll. Suhdivisiun Map, t mmnn Iingnl C<aurn-niunv ciati"nl Surveys Plaologramnacmic Surveys SAN DIEGUITD ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS November 5, 2002 SIDE 4460 City of Encinitas Engineering Services 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Subject: As- Graded Certification Reference: Project No. 98 -139, Remainder Parcel, Grading Permit No. 6809 -G In accordance with general note 9 on sheet 1 of the above referenced grading plan, this letter is hereby submitted as a certification that the grading under permit no. 6809 -G has been performed in substantial conformance with the City of Encinitas approved As -built grading plan no. 6809 -G. Sincerely, Ateven Crosby P.E. Senior Associate Engineer Date: (760) 753 -5525 a tax (760) 943.8236 4407 Manchester Avenue • Suite 105 • Encinitas, California 92024 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROTECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: 8- 9 -o/ r ),ee rl wa,V DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: TELEPHONE: j6Z AAlS /A! 77iE VICI,wy(l FVa R 73,n4G! oG //v 15 OAAC"- /5 (AZQ4 !A! IY/tiLeE ,4AlD Rou AlE. �cTJ(iiyC.f- t'f-ZO -a! sJo F!C77v /ry- ( 9- Ll - O7 FIRST D,9`/ 8,9c,c !o - v.vy c/461477 ✓I.517T7 517t 7,W09c/. G,CGG luh 7 /eck 6Q,w/,uy 57"e✓zw LOT f Qo 6-* e. TDE oG eGVA SG�LY wAS DUG AA/.O )S B67AJG GACJCF7LLEi�. /Vow /A/(� uuus!/r}L 7D /Ub N. AcrT ✓,7. 9-5 -01 KEtll. �� iiTiShFe° beiiia cr %T %��• �'c �s�FictsL/3►+o 6u�co -up 7b EZEI! - 9 -% -G! /u U+DA?k eo"72AlES /I. 9'f Z-, PlS GET Ta /0 t o ELEI1477oN - lVo s►cn, /7y._6AJLy 9 - �unm 7-0/ ,rUA7z7j AA! AA/ Oze Cr9A/yay• laA1 6 10AOV W171- /CLUB G1UCF OUl aPV447- Q/, l/o, l -- !S� dcnp v/_ c%4�j'�i✓/ QG�D55 oai«/ i-Yern W-0 SW 6,-, -A Y -fir A/E Coe. OACe Gva/rchni'u/ En ji�ie�°i �jop.oclrs, t.[(c�fi[/ a, %/ 4n w#oxe A eoboned &,,eR/lp d egiN BOUGHT oo-�ic 9-13 -01 N. AcrT ✓,7. 9-)7-0/ lVo s►cn, /7y._6AJLy laA1 6 10AOV W171- / 9 -!g -a Alp Acn(, . 9 -lq -01 A Aid 9 -30 -a2 Uc S-f- �7a ( FAqXSa 7a 9L rH4i;4>• /10- A.) AUA<+GiLlt- 61— Coih.O /Cfetr. . m14429 T0: FROM: ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects City Of District Support Services Encindas Field Operations Subdivision Engineeri ng Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. G809 &Z' Name of Project ALA E/H Name of Developer TESSE 0A KL Site Location 3065 (UILD F44WE2 DRIVE (address ...number _.street name ._suffix) (lot) !bldg) have inspected the grading at the subject site and have verified certification of the pad by the Engineer of Work, zfAeVe Cietssilk, , dated /O - --Zl- - - -off, and certification of soil compaction by the Soil Engineer, 0.#J dated S— I — OX. I am hereby Satisfied that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with•the approved plans and specifications, Chapter 23.24 of the Municipal Code, and any other applicable engineering standards and specific project requirements. Based on my observation and the certifications, I take no exception to the issuance of a building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail Improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed In accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Lure of Engineering Inspector) (Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if appropiatel Reference: Building Permit No. // --- 5 - -- 07— (Da te) (Date) Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. JSG /field3.doc 1 TEL 760 - 633.1600 / FAX 760 - 633 -2627 505 S. Vulon Avenue. Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760. 6334700 1� recycled paper NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. May 1, 2002 Project No. CE -6286 Roy Oakley 2171 Pavilion Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Subject: Report of Certification of Compacted Fill Ground Proposed Single Family Dwelling Remainder Parcel, Oakley Subdivision Wildflower Estates, Map No. 98 -139 Olivenhain, California APN #264- 091 -68 Dear Mr. Oakley: In response to your request, the following report has been prepared to indicate results of soil testing, observations, and inspection of earthwork construction at the subject site. Testing and inspection services were performed from August 30, 2001 through April 10, 2002. Briefly, our findings reveal filled ground has been compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90 %). Therefore, we recommend construction continue as scheduled. Our firm was retained to observe grading operations with regard to current standard practices and to determine the degree of compaction of placed fill. Grading plans were prepared by San Dieguito Engineering of Rancho Santa Fe, California. Grading operations were performed by Greg Whilock of Vista, California. Reference is made to the following previously submitted soils reports: 1.) "Update Report" prepared by Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. (SCT) dated May 20, 1999 2.) "Update Letter" prepared by North County Compaction Engineering, Inc. dated February 23, 2001 P. 0.130X 302002 ' E5CON0100, CA 92030 " (760) 480 -1116 FAX (760) 741 -6568 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6286 Page 2 Approximate locations and depth of filled ground and extent of earthwork construction covered in this report are indicated on the attached Plate No. One entitled, "Test Location Sketch ". Grading operations were performed in order to create a level building pad to accommodate the proposed single family dwelling. Should the finished pad be altered in any way, we should be contacted to provide additional recommendations. The site was graded in accordance with recommendations set forth in accordance with referenced reports No. 1 and No. 2. The site was graded to approximately conform to project plans. Actual pad size and elevation may differ. Finish grade operations are to be completed at a later date. LABORATORY TESTING Representative soils samples were collected and returned to the laboratory for testing. The following tests were performed and are tabulated on the attached Plate No. Three. 1. Optimum Moisture/Maximum Density (ASTM D -1557) 2. Expansion Potential Test (FHA Standard) Native soils encountered were clayey - sands, sandy -clays and silty- clays. Fill soils were generated from on -site excavation. The building site contained a transition from cut to fill. However, cut areas located within the building area were over excavated a minimum of 3 feet and brought to grade with compacted soil. On -site soils were found to have an expansion index varying between 84 and 125 and are classified as being "moderate to very high" in expansion potential. The key was approximately 15 feet wide, a minimum of 3 feet in depth, and inclined into the slope. During earthwork construction, native areas to receive fill were scarified, watered, and compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90 %) of maximum density. Subsequent fill soils were placed, watered, and compacted in 6 inch lifts. Benches were constructed in natural ground NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6286 Page 3 at intermediate levels to properly support the fill. To determine the degree of compaction, field density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D -1556 or D -2922 at the approximate horizontal locations designated on the attached Plate No. One entitled, "Test Location Sketch ". A tabulation of test results and their vertical locations are presented on the attached Plate No. Two entitled "Tabulation of Test Results ". Fill soils found to have a relative compaction of less the ninety percent (90 %) were reworked until proper compaction was achieved. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS Continuous inspection was not requested to verify fill soils are placed in accordance with current standard practices regarding grading operations and earthwork construction. Therefore, as economically feasible as possible, part-time inspection was provided. Hence, the following recommendations are based on the assumption that all areas tested are representative of the entire project. 1.) Compacted fill and natural ground within the defined building areas have adequate strength to safely support the proposed loads. 2.) Slopes may be considered stable with relation to deep seated failure provided they are properly maintained. Slopes should be planted with light groundcover (no gorilla ice plant) indigenous to the area. Drainage should be diverted away from the slopes to prevent water flowing on the face of slope. This will reduce the probability of failure as a result of erosion. 3.) In our opinion, soil liquefaction at the site is unlikely to occur due to the following on -site soils conditions: A). Groundwater was not encountered at the time of grading. B). Loose compressible topsoils were removed to firm native ground and recompacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90 %) of maximum dry density. C). The dense nature of the formation underlying the site. D). On -site soils possess relatively high cohesion characteristics. NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6286 Page 4 4.) Continuous footings having a minimum width of 12 inches and founded a minimum of 24 inches below lowest adjacent grade, will have an estimated allowable bearing value of 1200 pounds per square foot. 5.) Footings located on or adjacent to slopes should be founded at a depth such that the horizontal distance from the bottom outside face of footing to the face of the slope is a minimum of 8 feet. 6.) Plumbing trenches should be backfilled with a non - expansive soil having a swell of less than two percent (2 %) and a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Backfill soils should be inspected and compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90 %). 7.) Unless requested, recommendations for future improvements (additions, pools, recreation slabs, additional grading, etc.) Were not included in this report. Prior to construction, we should be contacted to update conditions and provide additional recommendations. 8.) Completion of grading operations was left at rough grade. Therefore, we recommend a landscape architect be contacted to provide finish grade and drainage recommendations. Drainage recommendations should include a two percent (2 %) minimum fall away from all foundation zones. 9.) Expansive soils conditions observed during grading operations will require special recommendations to reduce structural damage occurring from excessive subgrade and foundation movement. Recommendations set forth will reduce the probability of future damage and should be strictly adhered to: All continuous footings should be founded a minimum of 24 inches below lowest adjacent grade and reinforced with two #5 bars top and bottom (total of 4 bars). Steel should be positioned 3 inches below top of footing and 3 inches above bottom of footing. Interior slabs should be a minimum of 5 inches thick and reinforced with #3 bars on 18 inch centers each ways. Slab reinforcement should be placed near the center of slab and extended through joints to provide a tension tie with perimeter footings. Garage slabs should be free floating. NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6286 Page 5 Slab underlayment should consist of visqueen installed at mid -point within a 4 inch sand barrier (2 inches sand, visqueen, 2 inches sand). Sand should be tested in accordance with ASTM D -2419 to insure a minimum sand equivalent of 30. All foundation concrete should have a minimum compressive strength of 2500 psi. Clayey soils should not be allowed to dry prior to placing concrete. They should be watered to insure they are kept in a very moist condition or at a moisture content exceeding optimum moisture content by a minimum of five percent (5 %). Prior to pouring of concrete, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. should be contacted to inspect foundation recommendations for compliance to those set forth. An alternative construction method to the above expansive soils recommendations would be to have the slab designed as a post - tension concrete system. The design should be performed by a licensed engineer engaged in this type of design and who has a minimum of 5 years experience, A post- tension design may prove to be cost effective. In the event it is decided to utilize a post - tension system, additional laboratory testing will be required to provide the proper design criteria. This will incur an additional cost of $505.00 for providing this service. UNCERTAINTY AND LIMITATIONS In the event foundation excavation and steel placement inspection is required and/or requested, an additional cost of $170.00 will be invoiced to perform the field inspection and prepare a "Final Conformance Letter ". If foundations are constructed in more than one phase, $120.00 for each additional inspection will be invoiced. It is the responsibility of the owner and/or his representative to carry our recommendations set forth in this report. San Diego County is located in a high risk area with regard to earthquake. Earthquake resistant projects are economically unfeasible. Therefore, damage as a result of earthquake is probable and we assume no liability. We assume the on -site safety of our personnel only. We cannot assume liability of personnel other than our own, It is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to insure construction operations are conducted in a safe manner and in conformance with regulations governed by CAL -OSHA and/or local agencies. NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6286 Page 6 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President RKA:paj cc: (4) submitted Q�pfESS»,�Q O GE 713 m K E P. 9130105 D A Pv Dale R. Regli pF. C Registered Civil En Geotechnical Engineer 000713 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL TESTING PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING APPROX. SCALE 1 50' REMAINDER PARCEL " = OAKLEY SUBDIVISION WILDFLOWER ESTATES OLIVENNAIN, CALIFORNIA , — - �.: :'°o"' TEST �. 1 :If L i4, s 26 TEST .,oa �b sae `\ \ ` /6 { �. � � I i % �; �- jam, •, =. � � ` -' f/ fir:. ,�,/•'� - ,\ TEST LOCATION SKETCH PROJECT No. CE -6286 PLATE No. ONE NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING. INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS Test H Date Horizontal Vertical Field Moisture Dry Density Soil Percent of 2 Location Location % Dry Wt. LB Cu. Ft. Type Compaction 1 08/31101 See 211.0 14.8 111.8 1 91.5 2 Plate 213.0 15.0 110.6 I 90.5 3 One 211.0 16.1 110.0 1 90.0 4 213.0 14.8 110.6 1 90.5 5 09/04/01 215.0 15.5 111.8 I 91.5 6 216.0 16.6 110.5 I 90.4 7 215.0 16.6 111.8 I 91.5 8 216.0 15.8 112.3 I 91.9 9 09/05/01 218.0 17.3 109.8 Il 90.3 10 219.0 15.9 111.8 D 92.0 11 218.0 16.3 111.9 Il 92.1 12 219.0 15.1 111.0 B 91.3 13 09/06/01 219.0 14.6 115.7 II 95.2 14 220.0 17.6 112.0 D 92.1 15 219.0 16.9 111.1 Q 91.4 16 " 220.0 18.1 109.9 ll 90.4 17 221.0 15.7 109.8 H 90.3 18 222.0 17.7 111.6 11 91.8 19 221.0 16.1 113.4 11 93.3 20 " 222.0 15.3 112.6 P 92.6 21 09/11/01 213.0 17.1 109.6 11 90.2 22 215.0 15.8 111.1 ll 91.4 23 216.0 16.8 113.2 Q 93.1 24 218.0 16.5 110.1 D 90.6 25 216.0 15.8 111.0 R 91.3 26 218.0 16.0 110.6 D 91.0 27 220.0 16.7 109.9 R 90.4 28 09/12/01 218.0 16.1 111.5 Q 91.7 29 220.0 16.2 112.7 11 92.7 30 219.0 16.4 111.1 ll 91.4 31 219.0 15.8 112.2 R 92.3 32 04/10/02 224.0 RFG 13.8 107.4 111 90.9 33 1. 224.0 RFG 14.3 106.7 111 90.3 34 " 224.0 RFG 12.9 109.8 111 92.9 35 1. 224.0 RFG 12.4 110.5 Ill 93.5 REMARKS: RFG = Rough Finish Grade PROJECT NO. CE -6286 PLATE NO. TWO NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS OPTIMUM MOISTURE/MAXIMUM DENSELY SOIL DESCRIPTION TYPE MAX. DRY DENSITY OPT. MOISTURE (LB. CU. FT) (% DRY WT) Red Brown Sandy Clay 1 122.1 12.2 Light Brown Silty Clayey Sand 11 121.5 12.7 Light Grey Silty Sandy Clay III 118.1 12.5 EXPANSION POTENTIAL SAMPLE Nn I III CONDITION Remold 90% Remold 90% INITIAL MOISTURE ( %) 12.4 12.8 AIR DRY MOISTURE ( %) 6.5 9.3 FINAL MOISTURE ( %) 27.5 25.4 DRY DENSITY (PCF) 109.9 106.4 LOAD (PSF) 150 150 SWELL ( %) 12.5 8.4 EXPANSION INDEX 125 84 DIRECT SHEAR SAMPLE Nn I CONDITION ANGLE INTERNAL FRICTION COHESION INTERCEPT (PCF) Remold 90% 16 290 PROJECT NO. CE -6286 PLATE NO. THREE AUG 0 9 2001 UPDATE REPORT CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -139 WILDFLOWER DRIVE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA •: SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING 4407 MANCHESTER AVENUE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 81099 I PREPARED BY: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92120 Providing Professional Engineering Services Since 1959 STS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL &TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale S(ree(. San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160 -0627 619 - 280-4321. FAX 619- 2804717 May 20, 1999 San Dieguito Engineering 4407 Manchester Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 ATTENTION: Mr. Steve Crosby SCS &T 9911093.1 SUBJECT: Update Report, City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -139, Wildflower Drive, Encinitas, California. Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have prepared this update report for the subject project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject project will consist of a five lot residential subdivision, located at the south terminus of Wildflower Drive, in the City of Encinitas, Califomia. The project consists of the development of four residential lots as well as associated utilities, and an access street. The fifth lot will be left unimproved. Grading will consist of cuts and fills up to about 24 feet. Proposed cut and/or fill slopes will be constructed at a 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter inclination, up to a maximum height of about 31 feet and 36 feet, respectively. To assist in the preparation of this report we were provided with a tentative parcel plan prepared by San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. dated December 18, 1998. In addition, we have reviewed the following reports prepared by Southem California Soil and Testing, Inc.: 1) "Rippability Analysis for Deep Sewer Trench, Rancho De Mayo Subdivision;" May 21, 1990. 2) 'Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Rancho De Mayo Subdivision, Tract 88 -351 RPL;" May 24, 1989. P SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Page No. 3 CONCLUSIONS Based on our review of the aforementioned grading plan and reports, as well as a site reconnaissance, it is our opinion that the recommendations provided in the referenced gectechnical report are still applicable and should be implemented. The following additional recommendations are intended to provide updated recommendations where appropriate. The following recommendations take precedence over any conflicting recommendations contained in the referenced report. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS SELECT GRADING: Highly expansive soils should not be placed within a horizontal distance of ten feet from the face of fill slopes. SURFACE DRAINAGE: The drainage around the proposed buildings should be designed to collect and direct surface water away from proposed structures and the top of slopes toward approved draining facilities. Rain gutters on the structures that discharge runoff away from the building are recommended. The ground around the proposed structures should be graded so that surface water flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. In general, we recommend that the ground adjacent to structures slope away at a gradient of at least two percent. Densely vegetated areas where runoff can be impaired should have a minimum gradient of at least five percent within the first five feet from the structure. The client should be advised that drainage patterns approved at the time of fine grading should be maintained throughout the life of the proposed structures. They should also be advised to limit site irrigation to the minimum necessary to sustain landscape growth. Should excessive irrigation, impaired drainage, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones of perched groundwater conditions may occur. EARTHWORK: All earthwork and grading contemplated for site preparation should be accomplished in accordance with the attached Recommended Grading Specifications and Special Provisions. All special site preparation recommendations presented in the sections above will supersede those in the standard Recommended Grading Specifications. All embankments, structural till and fill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction at or slightly over optimum moisture content. Utility trench backfill within five feet of the proposed structures and beneath SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Page No. 4 pavements should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its maximum dry density. The upper twelve inches of subgrade beneath paved areas should be compacted to 95 percent of its maximum dry density. This compaction should be obtained by the paving contractor just prior to placing the aggregate base material and should not be part of the mass grading requirements. The maximum dry density of each soil type should be determined in accordance with ASTM Test D- 1557 -91, Method A or C. SLOPE STABILITY Proposed cut and/or fill slopes will be constructed at a 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) inclination to a maximum height of about 31 feet and 36 feet, respectively. It is our opinion that these slopes will possess an adequate factor -of -safety with respect to deep - seated gross stability, provided that the recommendations contained in the aforementioned geotechnical report, and this report are implemented (see Plate Number 1). FOUNDATION HORIZONTAL SETBACKS: Retaining wall footings located adjacent to or within slopes should be extended to a depth such that a minimum horizontal distance of ten feet exists between the face of the slope and the bottom of the footing. CONCRETE SLAB REINFORCEMENT: Minimum concrete slab reinforcement should consist of at least No. 3 bars placed at 18 inches on center each way. EXPANSIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The recommendations contained in this report, and the referenced geotechnical report reflect a nondetnmentally expansive condition resulting from a select grading operation. If such an operation is not performed revised recommendations will be needed. EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES PASSIVE PRESSURE: The passive pressure for the prevailing soil conditions may be considered to be 350 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. This pressure may be increased by one -third for seismic loading. The coefficient of friction for concrete to soil may be assumed to be 0.3 for the resistance to lateral movement. When combining frictional and passive resistance, the latter should be reduced by one - third. The upper 12 inches of soil should not be included in passive pressure calculations. SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Page No. 5 If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. DQBdI, R.C.E. #360 DBA:mw cc: (6) Submitted f1•:,r- of li. App 53 w / NG�G037 E0, OWO E:i I I SLOPE STABILITY CALCULATIONS Janbu's Simplified Slope Stability Method \AC (p_WHCTan FS_Ncf( C ) Assume Homogeneous Strength Parameters throughout the slope 0 ( °) C(psf) WA(pcf) Incl. H (ft) FS 20 375 116 2:1 36 1.8 Where* 0 - Angle of Internal Friction C - Cohesion (psf) Ws = Unit weight of Soil (pcf) H = Height of Slope (ft) FS = Factor of Safety <4SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA > SOIL A TESTING,INC. ENCINITAS TRACT N0. 98 -139 ar: DBA oA-re: 5/20/99 jog Muwaax: 9911093 PLATE: 1 SCS &T 991 1093.1 May 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 1 CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -139 WILDFLOWER DRIVE, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS - GENERAL PROVISIONS GENERAL INTENT The intent of these specifications is to establish procedures for clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to be filled, and placing and compacting fill soils to the lines and grades shown on the accepted plans. The recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report and/or the attached Special provisions are a part of the Recommended Grading Specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. These specifications shall only be used in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which they are a part. No deviation from these specifications will be allowed, except where specified in the geotechnical report or in other written communication signed by the Geotechnical Engineer. OBSERVATION AND TESTING Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc., shall be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer to observe and test the earthwork in accordance with these specifications. It will be necessary that the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative provide adequate observation so that he may provide his opinion as to whether or not the work was accomplished as specified. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the Geotechnical Engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes and new information and data so that he may provided these opinions. In the event that any unusual conditions not covered by the special provisions or preliminary geotechnical report are encountered during the grading operations. The Geotechnical Engineer shall be contacted for further recommendations. If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Engineer, substandard conditions are encountered, such as questionable or unsuitable soil, unacceptable moisture content, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc.; construction should be stopped until the conditions are remedied or corrected or he shall recommended rejection of this work. Tests used to determine the degree of compaction should be performed in accordance with the following American Society for Testing and Materials test methods: Maximum Density & Optimum Moisture Content - ASTM D- 1557 -91 Density of Soil In -Place - ASTM D- 1556 -90 or ASTM D -2922 i SCS &T 991 1093.1 May 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 2 All densities shall be expressed in terms of Relative Compaction as determined by the foregoing ASTM testing procedures. PREPARATION OF AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL All vegetation, brush and debris derived from clearing operations shall be removed, and legally disposed of. All areas disturbed by site grading should be left in a neat and finished appearance, free from unsightly debris. After clearing or benching the natural ground, the areas to be filled shall be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, brought to the proper moisture content, compacted and tested for the specified minimum degree of compaction. All loose soils in excess of 6 inches thick should be removed to firm natural ground which is defined as natural soils which possesses an in -situ density of at least 90 percent of its maximum dry density. When the slope of the natural ground receiving fill exceeds 20 percent (5 horizontal units to 1 vertical unit), the original ground shall be stepped or benched. Benches shall be cut to a firm competent formational soils. The lower bench shall be at least 10 feet wide or 1 -112 times the equipment width, whichever is greater, and shall be sloped back into the hillside at a gradient of not less than two percent. All other benches should be at least 6 feet wide. The horizontal portion of each bench shall be compacted prior to receiving fill as specified herein for compacted natural ground. Ground slopes flatter than 20 percent shall be benched when considered necessary by the Geotechnical Engineer. Any abandoned buried structures encountered during grading operations must be totally removed. All underground utilities to be abandoned beneath any proposed structure should be removed from within 10 feet of the structure and properly capped off. The resulting depressions from the above described procedure should be backfilled with acceptable soil that is compacted to the requirements of the Geotechnical Engineer. This includes, but is not limited to, septic tanks, fuel tanks, sewer lines or leach lines, storm drains and water lines. Any buried structures or utilities no to be abandoned should be brought to the attention of the Geotechnical Engineer so that he may determine if any special recommendation will be necessary. All water wells which will be abandoned should be backfilled and capped in accordance to the requirements set forth by the Geotechnical Engineer. The top of the cap should be at least 4 feet below finish grade or 3 feet below the bottom of footing whichever is greater. The type of cap will depend on the diameter of the well and should be determined by the Geotechnical Engineer and/or a qualified Structural Engineer. SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 3 FILL MATERIAL Materials to be placed in the fill shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer and shall be free of vegetable matter and other deleterious substances. Granular soil shall contain sufficient fine material to fill the voids. The definition and disposition of oversized rocks and expansive or detrimental soils are covered in the geotechnical report or Special Provisions. Expansive soils, soils of poor gradation, or soils with low strength characteristics may be thoroughly mixed with other soils to provide satisfactory fill material, but only with the explicit consent of the Geotechnical Engineer. Any import material shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer before being brought to the site. PLACING AND COMPACTION OF FILL Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in layers not to exceed 6 inches in compacted thickness. Each layer shall have a uniform moisture content in the range that will allow the compaction effort to be efficiently applied to achieve the specified degree of compaction. Each layer shall be uniformly compacted to the specified minimum degree of compaction with equipment of adequate size to economically compact the layer. Compaction equipment should either be specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability. The minimum degree of compaction to be achieved is specified in either the Special Provisions or the recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report. When the structural fill material includes rocks, no rocks will be allowed to nest and all voids must be carefully filled with soil such that the minimum degree of compaction recommended in the Special Provisions is achieved. The maximum size and spacing of rock permitted in structural fills and in non- structural fills is discussed in the geotechnical report, when applicable. Field observation and compaction tests to estimate the degree of compaction of the fill will be taken by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative. The location and frequency of the tests shall be at the Geotechnical Engineers discretion. When the compaction test indicates that a particular layer is at less than the required degree of compaction, the layer shall be reworked to the satisfaction of the Geotechnical Engineer and until the desired relative compaction has been obtained. Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. Compaction by sheepsfoot roller shall be at vertical intervals of not greater than four feet. In addition, fill slopes at a ratio of two horizontal to one vertical or (latter, should be trackrolled. Steeper fill slopes shall be over -built and cut -back to finish contours after the slope has been constructed. Slope compaction operations shall result in SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 4 all fill material six or more inches inward from the finished face of the slope having a relative compaction of at least 90 percent of maximum dry density or the degree of compaction specified in the Special Provisions section of this specification. The compaction operation on the slopes shall be continued until the Geotechnical Engineer is of the opinion that the slopes will be surficially stable. Density tests in the slopes will be made by the Geotechnical Engineer during construction of the slopes to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Where failing tests occur or other field problems arise, the Contractor will be notified that day of such conditions by written communication from the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative in the form of a daily field report. If the method of achieving the required slope compaction selected by the Contractor fails to produce the necessary results, the Contractor shall rework or rebuild such slopes until the required degree of compaction is obtained, at no cost to the Owner or Geotechnical Engineer. CUT SLOPES The Engineering Geologist shall inspect cut slopes excavated in rock or lithified formational material during the grading operations at intervals determined at his discretion. If any conditions not anticipated in the preliminary report such as perched water, seepage, lenticular or confined strata of a potentially adverse nature, unfavorably inclined bedding, joints or fault planes are encountered during grading„ these conditions shall be analyzed by the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer to determine if mitigating measures are necessary. Unless otherwise specified in the geotechnical report, no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than the allowed by the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency. ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Field observation by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative shall be made during the filling and compaction operations so that he can express his opinion regarding the conformance of the grading with acceptable standards of practice. Neither the presence of the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative or the observation and testing shall not release the Grading Contractor from his duty to compact all fill material to the specified degree of compaction. NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Jesse & Diana Oakley 2171 Pavilion Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Subject: Change of Soils Engineer Proposed Single Family Dwelling Remainder Parcel, Map No. 98 -139 Wildflower Estates Olivenhain, California APN 4264- 091 -68 AUG 0 9 2001 February 23, 2001 Project No. CE -6286 References: 1.) "Report of Geotechnical Investigation', Rancho de Mayo Subdivision, Tract 88 -351 RPL, Encinitas, California, prepared by Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. (SCT), dated May 24, 1989 2.) "Update Report", City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -139, Wildflower Drive, Encinitas, California, prepared by Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. (SCT), dated May 20, 1999 3.) "Update Letter ", prepared by North County Compaction Engineering, Inc., dated February 23, 2001 Dear Jesse & Diana Oakley: In response to your request, we respectfully submit the following information regarding the change of Soils Engineer. We, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC., have reviewed the above referenced soils reports. Subsequent to our review, we concur with findings, conclusions, and recommendations and are satisfied with the reports. We assume all responsibility within our purview as of February 23, 2001. We were contracted to provide soil testing and inspection services, to certify compliance with current standard practices regarding earthwork construction. P.O. BOX 302002 . ESCONDIDO, CA 92030 - (760)480 -1116 FAX (760)741 -6 568 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6286 Page 2 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. W-Z 11 Ronald K. Adams President RKA:paj cc: (3) submitted QQ,O� SS No. 713 i Exp. 9130101 J .' IU Cr 641d!� �G Q, Dale R. Re rl TECHN Qe�` Registered Cin O C 3 Geotechnical Engineer 000713 FROM :SEABRIGHTCOMPANY FAX NO. :760 - 720 -0098 the ;•Sea Bright ^company Facsimile Transmittal Letter Please deliver the following pages to: Jan. 10 2006 05:55PM P1 NAME: We are transmitting a total of _pages (In addition to this transmittal letter). FROM: _2D DATE: FI16 TIME: J Z�� IVI REF: �Q/L Uwe ✓l/ f �I For your future reference. our facsimile telephone number is (9WjZ20 -OQ98. (if you do not receive a 'receive tone' when you dial this number please call (1160)720-0098.) Fj5b -7�°� Engineenng ' Management , General Contacting • Development FROM :SEFIBRIGHTCOMPRNY Pa 'ferry' /'RmIDlnen SeanM'iry fur Gvimnmrnlal Prefeclion May 10. 2(1(15 FAX NO. :760 - 720 -0098 Jan. 10 2006 05:55PM P2 Division of Water Quality 1 W1 I Sln [ • S6cr3nWnM, CAllromil 95814 • (916) 341 -5536 Mailing Addresx: FA Boa 1977 - Sa=n [', Califnmir • 95812 -1977 FAX (916) 341 5543 . Inland AddLr : hrtp: //www.w4tc4toanlx.cu.ppv DOW Addresx' xmrmwaltr(Twnlrlboardx.n.gnv ' , , Bob Sukup Geoff & Gloria Doudera 4322 Sea Bright PI Carlsbad. CA 92008 -3650 RECEIPT OF YOUR NOTICE OF INTENT I�\ )rnnld Sebwaruneager 1 l Cevemor 19-13? The State Water Resources Control Board (State Watts Board) has received and processed your NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMPLY WITH T -IF 'rERMS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATRR ASSOCIATED WTIT-I CONSTRUCTION ACTfVITY. Accordingly, you are required to comply with the permit requirements. The WDID identification number 937C333985. Please use this number in any future communications regarding this permit. SITE DFSCRIPTION OWNER: Gooff & Gloria Doudera DEVEWPER:,Iim Hight Constnlction COUNTY: San Diego SITE ADDRESS: 3065 Wiloflower Dr Lra:initas, CA COMMENCEMENT DATE: 5/16/05 EST. COMPLETION DATE: 05/16/06 When construction is complete or ownership has been transferred, dischargers are required to notify the Regional Water Board by submitting a Notice of Termination (NOT). All Slate and local requirements must be met in accordance with Special Provision No. 7 of the Creneral Permit. If you do not notify the State Water Board that construction activity has been completed you will continue to be invoiced for the annual fee each April. Please visit the storm water web page at www. waterboard s.ca.gov /stomiwtr /index.htmi to obtain an NOT and other storm water related information and fonns. If you have any questions regarding permit requirements, please comae:( your Regional Water Board at (858) 467 -2952. Sincerely, Storm Water Section Division of Water Qualiiy California EnPiroamental Protection Agency fd HmIrled Pap,, CP L C NL• �e CD• DM I • • • •� � •• Mr. Al F. Mayo 1682 Kettering Street Irvine, California 92714 Southern California Soil 5 Testing, Inc- Post office Box 20627 6280 Riverdale Street San Diego, California 92120 STG SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING. INC. 6280 Riverdale Street, San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego. CA 92160-0627 619 - 280-4321. FAX 619- 280 -4717 May 24, 1989 Mr. Al F. Mayo 1682 Kettering Street SCS &T 8921055 Irvine, California 92714 Report No. 1 SUBJECT: Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Rancho De Mayo Subdivision, Tract 88 -351 RPL, Encinitas, California. In accordance with your request, investigation for the subject project our study are presented herewith. we have completed a geotechnical The findings and recommendations of The findings of this study indicate that the site is suitable for the proposed development provided the recolmendations presented in the attached report are followed. The mist significant geotechnical conditions affecting the proposed developmnt is the presence of retavolcan-ic hardrock in various degrees of decomposition, highly expansive topsoils and expansive formational soils intermixed with nonexpansive soils. These conditions will require special grading consideration as described herein. If you have any questions after reviewing the findings and recommendations contained in the attached report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL &TESTING, INC. Charles H. Christian, R.G.E. #00215 ohn R. High, C.E. . #1237 CHC:JRH:ma QPvr�oaipN4 cc: (3) Submitted Qt; ��g H. Cy2i l (3) San Dieguito Engineering Inc. �� QQ sJ �6' (1) SCS &T, Escondido No. GE000215 * UP. 9 -30 -89 G �. J) f�2ECNN�tpQC�\Q FOF CALF G� o`O n it NO 1237 CERTIFIED n ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST 9T 6.3090 OQ= FOF CALF MUNIPMOAMIke : PIS Introduction and Project Description ......... ..............................1 ProjectScope ................................ ..............................2 Findings..................................... ..............................3 Site Description ......................... ..............................3 General Geology and Subsurface Conditions ..............................4 Geologic Setting and Soil Description .............................4 Artificial Fill ( Quaf/ Qcaf) .... ..............................4 Topsoils and Subsoils .......... ..............................4 Alluvium( Qal) ................. ..............................5 Lusardi Formation Q) ......... ..............................5 Santiago Peak Metavolcanics p sp ) ............................ 5 Tectonic Setting .................... ..............................6 GeologicHazards ......................... ..............................7 General............................. ..............................7 Groundshaki ng ....................... ..............................7 Groundwater ......................... ..............................7 Conclusions .................................. ..............................8 Recommendations .............................. ..............................8 Grading.................................. ..............................8 Site Preparation .................... ..............................8 Rippability Characteristics ......... ..............................9 RockDisposal ....................... ..............................9 Undercutting........................ ..............................9 Select Grading for Expansive Soils .. .............................10 Surface Drainage .................... .............................10 Earthwork........................... .............................10 Slope Stability .......................... .............................11 General............................. .............................11 Allowable Slope Height .............. .............................11 Fill slope Constructions ............ .............................12 Foundations and Interior Slabs ........... .............................12 General............................. .............................12 Reinforcement ....................... .............................12 Concrete Slabs ...................... .............................12 SpecialLots ........................ .............................13 Settlement Characteristics .......... .............................13 Expansive Characteristics ........... .............................13 Foundation Plan Review .............. .............................13 Earth Retaining Walls .................... .............................14 Passive Pressure .................... .............................14 Active Pressure ..................... .............................14 Backfill............................ .............................14 Factor of Safety .................... .............................14 Limitations .................................. .............................15 TAEIE of CCUPEN15 (continued) WOO Review, observation and Testing .......... .............................15 Uniformity of Conditions ................. .............................15 ChangeIn Scope .......................... .............................15 Time Limitations ......................... .............................16 Professional Standard .................... .............................16 Client's Responsibility .................. .............................16 FieldExplorations ........................... .............................17 LaboratoryTesting ........................... .............................17 • r r� Figure 1 Plate 1 Plate 2 Plates 3 -17 Plate 18 Plate 19 Site Vicinity Map, Follows Page 1 Plot Plan Subsurface Exploration Legend Trench lags Grain Size Distribution Rock Disposal Reconmended Grading Specification and Special Provisions .SC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA T SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Street. San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego. CA 92160 -0627 619 - 280-4321, FAX 619- 280.4717 QI9,9 51@d IJ 1 .7. M RANCHO DE MAYO SUBDIVISION TRACT 88 -351 RPL ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA ,TMNYL T - • D 16l -6 This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed Rancho De Mayo Residential Subdivision to be located south of Bu enn Road, in the City of Encinitas, California. The site location is shown on the vicinity map provided as Figure Number 1 on the following page. It is our understanding that the site will be developed to receive a 23 lot residential subdivision. Proposed structures will be one and/or two stories high and of wood -frame construction. Shallow foundations as well as conventional slab -on -grade floor systems are anticipated. The proposed grading concept is to construct the interior streets and to construct individual building pads on each lot. Based on this, the grading will consist of cuts and fills less than about 20 feet deep. Proposed cut and fill slopes will have a maximum height of about 25 feet and 20 feet, respectively, and will have an inclination of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. To assist in the preparation of this report we were provided with a tentative map prepared by San Dieguito Engineering Inc., dated November 28, 1988. hie were also provided with a new undated tentative map by San Dieguito I � _ I I � I � awu�. x mow. �{I.wrr SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ' SOIL & TESTING, INC. BY: CHC /EM IDATE: 5 -25 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 lFiqure No. 1 SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 2 Engineering that shows one less lot and a slightly smaller area within the subdivision. This map was used for our base map for our geologic map presented herewith as Plate Number 1. The site configuration, proposed grading and approximate locations of our subsurface explorations are shown on Plate Number 1 of this report. The investigation consisted of: surface reconnaissance, subsurface explorations, obtaining representative disturbed and undisturbed samples, laboratory testing, analysis of the field and laboratory data, research of available geological literature pertaining to the site, and preparation of this report. More specifically, the intent of this analysis was to: a) Explore the subsurface conditions to the depths influenced by the proposed construction. b) Evaluate, by laboratory tests, the pertinent engineering properties of the various strata which will influence the develop- ment, including their bearing capacities, expansive characteris- tics, settlement potential and rippability characteristics. c) Describe the general geology at the site including possible geologic hazards which could have an effect on the site development. d) Address potential construction difficulties such as rippability of rock materials and provide recommendations concerning these problems . e) Develop soil engineering criteria for site grading and provide design information regarding the stability of cut and fill slopes. f) Recmrnend an appropriate foundation system for the type of structures anticipated and develop soil engineering design criteria for the recomrended foundation design. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 3 Y6D- The subject site is an irregular shaped parcel of land located near the southern terminus of Rancho De Mayo in the Olivenhain area of Encinitas, California. The site covers approximately 52.5 acres and is bounded by undeveloped land on the south and east and residential property as well as undeveloped land on the north and west. Topographically, the site is comprised of hilly terrain with well incised drainage courses located on the eastern, western, southern and central portions of the site. Elevations range from approximately 315 feet (MSL) at the southern boundary to approximately 110 feet (MSL) at the most eastern boundary of the site. Slopes range from very gentle to relatively steep, with some inclination being on the order of 1 to 1 ( horizontal to vertical) . Drainage is accomplished via sheetflow, and in the well incised drainage courses. It should be noted that an earthen dam and a few earthen dikes have been constructed across two of the drainage courses on the central and eastern portions of the site, respectively. In addition, another earthen dam exists immediately off -site and adjacent to the northern property boundary. The locations of the dam and dikes are indicated on Plate Number 1. No water was noted in the drainage courses, but dense vegetation which would indicate near surface moisture exists within the two water retention areas which have been dammed. Vegetation consists of native grasses and weeds with the denser brush and trees located within drainage courses. The site was previously used for agricultural purposes and large boulders cleared from the cultivated areas have been placed in piles throughout the site. These piles of large boulders and soil are indicated on Plate Number 1 as undocumented fill (Quaf). Previous grading on site has also resulted in two large pads being constructed on the southern portion of the site. No structures were noted on site, however overhead utility lines were noted along the western property line and a sewer manhole was noted on the SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 4 western portion of the site. The sewer manhole is located in a concrete slab and the location is shown on Plate Number 1. The direction in which the sever main traverses was not determined. GECL=C SFTPTR; AMID SOIL DESCF=ON: The subject site is located near the boundary between the Coastal Plains and Foothills Physiographic Province of San Diego County and is underlain by Jurassic -age Santiago Peak Meta - volcanics, Cretaceous -age Lusardi Formation, Quaternary -age alluvium, associated residuum and artificial fill. A brief description of soil units are presented below and the approximate limits of them are indicated on Plate Number 1. ARTIFICIAL FILL (Quaf/Qcaf): The fills noted on site consist of nonengineered agricultural fill (Quaf) and engineered fill (Qcaf). The engineered fill is located on the two large pads located on the southern portion of the site. We understand that the fill was placed in 1982 under the observation of San Dieguito Soils, Inc., however, we have not been provided with documentation verifying this understanding. The engineered fill appears to range up to approximately ten feet in thickness and is comprised of humid, medium dense, brown to light brown, silty sand and clayey sand with some rock fragments. The agricultural fills consists of an earthen dam and small dikes as well as stockpiles of soils and large boulders which have been cleared from the cultivated areas. Some of this fill has been indicated on Plate Number 1. However, isolated areas of unidentified agricultural fills are anticipated to exist on site and should be exposed during the development of this site. These fills appear to range up to approximately seven feet in thickness and are not suitable, in their present condition, to receive settlement sensitive structures or fills. TOPSOILS AND SUBSOILS: The topsoils and subsoils range to depths of approximately six feet below the existing ground surface. The topsoils SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 5 typically consist of loose, humid, brown to dark brown, silty sand and clayey sand. The underlying subsoils are generally highly expansive, humid and medium stiff to stiff, brown to grey brown clay and sandy clay. AILUVIIM (Qal): The alluvium noted on site is located in the narrow confines of the drainage courses and in the water retention reservoirs behind the two earthen dams shown on Plate Number 1. The thicknesses of alluvium is anticipated to be between approximately two feet and eight feet and comprised of loose, humid, mixtures of gravels, cobbles, sands and clays. LUSARDI FORMATION (R1): The central northern and central western portions of the site are underlain by the Lusardi Formation. The Lusardi Formation was encountered underlying the topsoils and subsoils at depths ranging from approximately one foot to 5.5 feet below the existing grades. The Lusardi Formation on site consists of dense to very dense, greenish tan, grey and rusty brown, silty sand and clayey sand to sandy clay. The silty sands typically have relatively good strength parameters, however, the sandy clays have relatively low shear strengths. If the clays are exposed in cut slopes shallow, surficial slope stability will need to be addressed. It is recommended that a qualified engineering geologist observe all cut slopes during the proposed development. SANTIAGO PEAR METAVOLCANICS (Jsp): The approximate limits of the Santiago Peak Metavolcanic bedrock is indicated on Plate Number 1. The upper contact of this formation was encountered at depths ranging from the ground surface to approximately six feet below the existing grades. The Santiago Peak Metavolcanic bedrock is comprised of fractured hardrock which weathers to a fine, silty, clayey soils with angular rock fragments. The highly fractured weathered bedrock ranges from approximately one foot to eleven feet in thickness. Underlying the highly fractured and weathered metavolcanics, the bedrock becomes less SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 6 fractured and very dense hardrock. Excavation refusal with the backhoe was encountered at depths as shallow as three feet below the ground surface. Unless the Santiago Peak Metavolcanic bedrock is highly fractured and weathered, typically light trenching equipment cannot excavate this bedrock material. It should be noted that isolated hardrock floaters within rippable materials are anticipated to exist on site. The size or locations of these hardrock floaters are not readily identifiable but should be anticipated to be encountered during grading. TEC7CNIC SETTING: No faults are ]mown to traverse the subject site but it should be noted that mach of Southern California, including the San Diego County, area is characterized by a series of Quaternary -age fault zones which typically consist of several en echelon faults that generally strike in a northerly to northwesterly direction. Some of these fault zones (and the individual faults within the zone) are classified as active while others are classified as only potentially active according to the criteria of the California Division of Mines and Geology. Active fault zones are those which have shown conclusive evidence of faulting during the Holocene Epoch (the most recent 11,000 years) while potentially active fault zones have demonstrated movement during the Pleistocene Epoch (11,000 to 2 million years before the present) but no movement during Holocene time. A review of available geologic maps indicates that the site is approximately 10 miles east of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. Recent earthquake activity along faults in the southern extension of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone indicate that this zone could be classified as active. The recent seismic events along a small portion of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone generated earthquakes of magnitude 4.0 or less. Other active fault zones in the region that could possibly affect the site include the Coronado Banks and San Clemente Fault Zones to the west and the Elsinore and San Jacinto Fault Zones to the northeast. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 7 ,r.ou �e1 .r• :: �. GENERAL: The site is located in an area which is relatively free of potential geologic hazards. Hazards such as tsunamis, seiches, and landsliding should be considered negligible or nonexistent. GROUNDSHARING: The most likely geologic hazard to affect the site is groundshaking as a result of movement along one of the major, active fault zones mentioned above. The maximum bedrock accelerations that wuuld be attributed to a maxim= probable earthquake occurring along the nearest portion of selected fault zones that could affect the site are summarized in the following table. :i® Earthquakes on the Rose Canyon Maximum Probable Bedrock Design Fault Zone Distance Earthquake Acceleration Acceleration Rose Canyon 10 miles 6.0 magnitude 0.26 g 0.18 g Elsinore 23 miles 7.3 magnitude 0.21 g 0.14 g San Jacinto 44 miles 7.3 magnitude 0.14 g 0.10 g Earthquakes on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone is expected to be relatively minor. Major seismic events are likely to be the result of novement along the San Jacinto or Elsinore Fault Zones. GROUNDWATER: No groundwater was encountered during our subsurface exploration and we do not anticipate any major groundwater related problems, either during or after construction. However, depending on the season of the year when grading is accomplished, saturated soils may be encountered within the drainage courses and within the water retention areas which are dammed at the present. In addition, it should be recognized that minor groundwater seepage problems may occur after development of a site even where none were present before development. These are usually minor SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 8 phenomena and are often the result of an alteration of the permeability characteristics of the soil, an alteration in drainage patterns and an increase in irrigation water. Based on the permeability characteristics of the soil and the anticipated usage of the development, it is our opinion that any seepage problems which may occur will be minor in extent. It is further our opinion that these problems can be most effectively corrected on an individual basis if and when they develop. Vii: Mf :f.6.1[f;.�y Based on the results of this investigation, it is our opinion that the site may be developed as proposed, provided the recommendations presented in this report are complied with. The most significant geotechnical conditions exposed that will affect site development is the presence of hard rock in portions of the site that may require blasting or difficult excavation, and the presence of moderately to highly expansive topsoils and some strata of moderately expansive sedimentary deposits. These conditions are discussed further in the appropriate sections below. In addition, two pads have already been constructed that contain what we believe to be engineered fills (Qcaf) . In order for these fills to be allowed to remain, it will be necessary to obtain documentation, by the soils engineer who tested and observed the placement of these fills, that the fills were properly placed and are suitable to support settlement sensitive structures. If this documentation cannot be obtained, the fills will need to be removed and replaced under our observation. SITE PREPARATIC%S: The site preparation should begin with the removal of all vegetation and other materials determined by the soil engineer to be detrimental to structural fills, from areas to be graded and /or to receive improvements. This material should be disposed of off -site. Once this is SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 9 accomplished, the areas to be graded should be stripped of all loose topsoils, subsoils and alluvial deposits to firm formational soils and be replaced as structural fill. The existing undocumented fills should also be removed, including the small dikes and drainage retention structures. RIPPABILM CHARACTERISTICS: Several of our backhoe trenches encountered refusal on hard rocky materials at relatively shallow depths. These trenches were in the areas mapped as being underlain by metavolcanic rock (Jsp). The shallowest hard rock appears to be located in two general areas. One area is the knoll in the vicinity of Tats 11, 15 and 16 (see Trench Numbers 6, 7 and 11). The second area is now off -site in the knoll in the vicinity of Trench Number 14. Cuts in these areas will require heavy ripping and may require some blasting. The materials generated by blasting and where heavy ripping is necessary will most likely consist of fractured rock with few fines. Some of the rock produced by blasting may be oversized for use in structural fills and may need to be placed in nonstructural fill areas, or be split into smaller sizes. Placement of oversize rock in fills is discussed below. ROCK DISPOSAL: It is anticipated that oversize rock will be generated during grading operations. oversized rock is defined as rock over 24 inches in diameter. This material may be utilized for landscaping purposes, exported from the site or be split into pieces smaller than two feet in maximum dimension, and incorporated in structural fills. Rock between six inches and two feet in maximum dimension should be placed in accordance with the specifications presented on Plate Number 19 and should be placed such that no nesting occurs and the soil surrounding the rock is properly compacted. In addition, oversized material may be placed in structural fills as indicted on Plate Number 19. UNDERCUITI9G: It is recommended that the cut portions of daylight lots and all lots that required blasting and /or heavy ripping be undercut to a depth of three feet below finish grade. Further, streets that pass through hard SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 10 rock areas should be undercut such that the underground utilities can be installed. As an alternative to undercutting the entire street, selected areas may be undercut and the deepest trenches may be concentrated there. All undercut areas should be filled with properly compacted, nondetrimentally expansive soils. SELECT GRADING FOR EXPANSIVE SOILS: The topsoils and subsoils overlying the Lusardi Formation (K1) were found to have high to very high expansive potential. In addition, some of the soils within the Lusardi Formation and sane of the highly weathered metavolcanic rock material were found to be moderately expansive. In order to use standard foundation and slab design, we recommend that soils with high and very high expansive potential not be allowed within four feet of finish pad grade. Moderately expansive soils should not be allowed within three feet of finish grade. Where expansive soils occur naturally within these limits, they should be removed and be replaced with nondetrimentally expansive soil. When used in fill, expansive soils should be placed only below the limits recommended above. If it is desired not to use select grading to mitigate the expansive soil conditions, special foundation and slab design will be necessary. Such design recommendations should be made on a lot by lot basis after grading when it can be determined to what extent the expansive soils will exist. SUfd?ACE DRAINFM: It is recommended that all surface drainage be directed assay from the structures and that ponding of water not be allowed adjacent to their foundation. F.ArmwKIIIC: All earthwork and grading contemplated for site preparation should be accomplished in accordance with the attached Recommended Grading specifications and Special Provisions. All special site preparation recommendations presented in the sections above will supersede those in the standard Recommended Grading Specifications. All embankments, structural fill and fill should be compacted to at least 90% relative compaction at or slightly over optimum misture content. Utility trench backfill within five feet of the proposed structures and beneath asphalt pavements should be SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 11 compacted to minimum of 90% of its maximum dry density. The upper twelve inches of subgrade beneath paved areas should be compacted to 95% of its maximum dry density. This compaction should be obtained by the paving contractor just prior to placing the aggregate base material and should not be part of the mass grading requirements. The maximum dry density of each soil type should be determined in accordance with A.S.T.M. Test Method D-1557-78, Method A or C. COAL: The native soils on -site are predominantly sandy and/or rock like materials of sedimentary or metavolcanic origin. The rock materials will have extremely high strength parameters in both cut and fill slopes. However, with the metavolcanic rock, fines will probable need to be mixed with the rock fragments to produce a compactable material. The stability of fill slopes will therefore be affected by the strength of the matrix material. The sands of the Lusardi Formation have relatively high strength parameters in both cut and fill slopes. The clayey topsoils and subsoils have relatively weak strength parameters and should not be allowed within a distance from the face of fill slopes equal to three - fourths the slope height. The clayey portions of the Lusardi Formation also have relatively weak strength parameters. These soils should not be placed in fills near the face of the slope and should not be allowed in cut slopes over 15 feet high. If exposed in higher cut slopes, buttressing may be necessary. It should be determined during grading if buttressing is necessary and what the shape of the buttress should be. ALIONABLE SIM HEIGHT: Cut slopes made in the metavolcanic rock to the maximum planned height of 25 feet will have a factor -of- safety well above the standard of 1.5 in regards to deep - seated failure or surficial failure. All cut slopes in this material should, however, be observed by a member of our engineering geology staff for evidence of adverse joint patterns or unstable rock loosened by the excavation. The proposed cut slopes in the Lusardi Formation, for the height of 15 feet or less at an inclination of SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 12 2:1, will also have a factor -of- safety in excess of the minimum friction of 1.5. Fill slopes constructed on the silty sands and clayey sands of the Lusardi Formation and /or the rocky materials obtained from cuts in the metavolcanic rock, that are made at a slope inclination of 2.0 horizontal to 1.0 vertical for the maximum proposed height of 20 feet, will have a factor-of-safety of at least 1.5 for deep seated (rotational) and surficial failures. FILL SC M CONSTRUCFIONS: All fill slopes should be compacted by back - rolling with a sheepsfoot roller at intervals of four feet or less. once completed, the fill slopes should be track - rolled to compact the near surface soils. No surface run -off should be allowed to flow over the top of slopes and the slopes should be planted with erosion resistant landscaping. Iceplant types of groundcover should not be used on slopes. GENERAL: Provided no detrimentally expansive soils will exist on the building pads, within the limits discussed above under "Select Grading ", conventional shallow footings can be used for the support of the proposed structures. Footings should be founded at least 12 inches and 18 inches below lowest adjacent finished pad grade for one and two -story structures, respectively. The minimum width for continuous and isolated footings should be 12 inches and 24 inches, respectively. Such footings may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 psf. The bearing pressure may be increased by one -third when considering wind and /or seismic loading. REIIFII: It is recommended that minimum reinforcement consist of at least two No. 5 reinforcing bars, one located near the top of the footings and one near the bottom. This reinforcement is based on soil characteristics and is not intended to be in lieu of reinforcement necessary to satisfy structural considerations. CONCRETE SLABS: Concrete on -grade slabs should have a minimum actual thickness of four inches and be reinforced with No. 3 reinforcing bars SCS &T 8921055 may 24, 1988 Page 13 placed at 36 inches on center each way. A 6 "x6 "- W1.4xW1.4 welded wire mesh :ray be utilized in lieu of the reinforcement bars. It is imperative that slab reinforcing be properly placed near the middle of the slab in order to be effective. A four - inch -thick layer of coarse, poorly graded sand or rock should be placed underneath the slab. where moisture- sensitive floor coverings are planned, the slab should also be underlain by a visqueen moisture barrier over the sand blanket with one - inch -thick layer of clean sand provided above the visqueen to allow proper concrete curing. SPECIAL IOT5: Special lots are defined as daylight lots where the fill thickness exceeds 10 feet, and fill lots where the fill differential exceeds 15 feet. For these lots, minimum foundation reinforcement should be increased to two No. 5 reinforcing bars near the top of the footing and two near the bottom. In addition, minimum slab -on -grade reinforcement should be increased to No. 3 reinforcing bars placed at 24 inches on center each way or a 6 "x6 "- W2.9xW2.9 welded wire mesh. SETIIF24ENP CHARACTE:RISTICS: The anticipated total and /or differential settlements for the proposed structure may be considered to be within tolerable limits provided the recommendations presented in this report are followed. It should be recognized that minor cracks normally occur in concrete slabs and foundations due to shrinkage during curing or redistribution of stresses and some cracks may be anticipated. Such cracks are not necessarily an indication of excessive vertical movements. EXPANSIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The recommendations contained in this report assume that nondetrimentally expansive conditions will exist after grading is complete. If this is not the case, revised recommendations will be necessary. FuLmmCN PLAN REVIEW: The foundation plan should be submitted to this office for review to ascertain that the recommendation provided in this report have been implemented and the assumptions utilized in preparing this report are still applicable. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 14 PASSIVE PRESSURE: The passive pressure for the prevailing soil conditions may be considered to be 350 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. This pressure may be increased one -third for seismic loading. The coefficient of friction for concrete to soil may be assumed to be 0.40 for the resistance to lateral m7verent. When combining frictional and passive resistance, the friction value should be reduced by one - third. The upper six inches of soil adjacent to exterior retaining wall footings should not be included in passive pressures calculations. ACTIVE PRESSURE: The active soil pressure for the design of earth retaining structures with level backfills may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing 35 pounds per cubic foot for walls free to move at the top (unrestrained walls). An additional 15 pounds per cubic foot should be assumed for 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) sloping backfill. These pressures do not consider any other surcharge. If any other are anticipated, this office should be contacted for the necessary increase in soil pressure. This value assumes a drained backfill condition. Waterproofing and wall drainage details should be provided by the project architect. BACKFnL: All backfill soils should be contacted to at least 908 relative conpaction. Expansive or clayey soils should not be used for backfill naterial. The wall should not be backfilled until the masonry has reached an adequate strength. FACTOR OF SAFETY: The above values, with the exception of the allowable soil friction coefficient do not include a factor of safety. Appropriate factors of safety should be incorporated into the design to prevent the walls from overturning and sliding. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 15 I _ IMN • The recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon our review of final plans and specifications. Such plans and specifications should be made available to the soil engineer and engineering geologist so that they may review and verify their compliance with this report and with Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code. It is recommended that Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. be retained to provide continuous soil engineering services during the earthwork operations. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to start of construction. The recommendations and opinions expressed in this report reflect our best estimate of the project requirements based on an evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions encountered at the subsurface exploration locations and the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from those encountered. It should be recognized that the performance of the foundations and /or cut and fill slopes may be influenced by undisclosed or unforeseen variations in the soil conditions that may occur in the intermediate and unexplored areas. Any unusual conditions not covered in this report that may be encountered during site development should be brought to the attention of the soils engineer so that he may make modifications if necessary. w1. .r_ - •nI+ This office should be advised of any changes in the project scope or proposed site grading so that it may be determined if the recommmendations contained herein are appropriate. This should be verified in writing or modified by a written addendum. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 16 OUGIMMIOMMULO The findings of this report are valid as of this date. Changes in the condition of a property can, however, occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the cork of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in the State -of- the - Practice and /or Government Codes may occur. Due to such changes, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or in part by changes beyond our control. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after a period of two years without a review by us verifying the suitability of the conclusions and recommendations. IL:•11y}. M NNVa u1.: Val In the performance of our professional services, we comply with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in the same locality. The client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at the locations where our borings, surveys, and explorations are made, and that our data, interpretations, and recommendations are based solely on the information obtained by us. We will be responsible for those data, interpretations, and recommendations, but shall not be responsible for the interpretations by others of the information developed. Our services consist of professional consultation and observation only, and no warranty of any kind whatsoever, express or implied, is made or intended in connection with the work performed or to be performed by us, or by our proposal for consulting or other services, or by our furnishing of oral or written reports or findings. It is the responsibility of Mr. Al F. Mayo, or his representatives to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the engineer and architect for the project and incorporated SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 17 into the project's plans and specifications. It is further his responsibility to take the necessary measures to insure that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out such recommendations during construction. Fourteen subsurface explorations were made at the locations indicated on the attached Plate Number 1 on April 13 and 14, 1989. These explorations consisted of trenches dug by means of a backhoe. The field work was conducted under the observation of our engineering geology personnel. The explorations were carefully logged when made. These logs are presented on the following Plates Number 3 through 17. The soils are described in accordance with the Unified Soils Classification System as illustrated on the attached simplified chart on Plate 2. In addition, a verbal textural description, the wet color, the apparent moisture and the density or consistency are provided. The density of granular soils is given as either very loose, loose, medium dense, dense or very dense. The consistency of silts or clays is given as either very soft, soft, medium stiff, stiff, very stiff, or hard. Disturbed and "undisturbed" samples of typical and representative soils were obtained and returned to the laboratory for testing. Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with the generally accepted American Society for Testing and Materials (A.S.T.M.) test methods or suggested procedures. A brief description of the tests performed is presented below: a) CIASSIFICATICN: Field classifications were verified in the laboratory by visual examination. The final soil classifications are in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 b) MDISTURE- DENSITY: Field rmisture content and dry density were determined for representative samples obtained. This information was an aid to classification and permitted recognition of variations in material consistency with depth. The dry unit weight is determined in pounds per cubic foot, and the field moisture content is determined as a percentage of the soil's dry weight. The results are summarized in the trench logs. C) GRAIN SIZE DIS'TR =CN: The grain size distribution was determined for representative samples of the native soils in accordance with A.S.T.M. Standard Test D-422. The results of these tests are presented on Plate Number 18. d) CCHPAMCN TEST: The maxis= dry density and optimum moisture content of typical soils were determined in the laboratory in accordance with A.S.T.M. Standard Test D- 1557 -78, Method A. The results of these tests are presented below. e) EXPANSION III TEST: Expansion index tests on remolded samples were performed on representative samples of soils likely to be present at finish grade. The tests were performed on the portion of the samples passing the #4 standard sieve. The samples were brought to optimum moisture content then dried back to a constant moisture content for 12 hours at 230 +/- 9 degrees Fahrenheit. Optimum Sample Maximum Moisture Number Description Density Content T 1 @ 2' -3' Clayey Silty Sand 116.7 pcf 13.3% Tll @ 6' -7' Very Silty Sand 109.0 pcf 18.1% T12 @ 7' -8' Sandy Clay/Clayey Sand 123.1 pcf 10.5% e) EXPANSION III TEST: Expansion index tests on remolded samples were performed on representative samples of soils likely to be present at finish grade. The tests were performed on the portion of the samples passing the #4 standard sieve. The samples were brought to optimum moisture content then dried back to a constant moisture content for 12 hours at 230 +/- 9 degrees Fahrenheit. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 19 The specimens were then compacted in a 4- inch - diameter mold in two equal layers by means of a tanper, then trimmed to a final height of 1 inch, and brought to a saturation of approximately 50 %. The specimens were placed in a consolidometer with porous stones at the top and bottom, a total normal load of 12.63 pounds was placed (144.7 psf), and the samples were allowed to consolidate for a period of 10 minutes. The samples were allowed to become saturated, and the change in vertical movement was recorded until the rate of expansion became nominal. The expansion index test results are reported below as the total vertical displacement times the fraction of the sanple passing the #4 sieve times 1000. CLASSIFICATION OF EXPANSIVE SOIL EXPANSION INDEX POTENTIAL EXPANSION 1 -20 very low 21 -50 low 51 -90 medium 91 -130 high Above 130 very high Initial Interior Final Sample Moisture Density Moisture Expansion Number % pcf % Index Classification T1 @ 2-3' 10.8 106.1 21.4 20 Very Law T3 @ 3' -4' 11.2 105.5 26.5 70 Medium T4 @ 2' -3' 14.0 95.6 35.6 145 Very High T8 @ 4' -5' 9.6 111.5 19.8 40 Low T12 @ 1' -2' 13.4 98.2 31.3 127 High T12 @ 7' -8' 10.3 108.8 22.8 63 Medium SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 20 f) DIRECT' SHEAR TESTS: Direct shear tests were performed on samples of the native soils remolded to 90 percent relative compaction to determine the failure envelope based on yield shear strength. The shear box was designed to accomcdate a sample having diameters of 2.375 inches or 2.50 inches and a height of 1.0 inch. Samples were tested at different vertical loads and a saturated moisture content. The shear stress was applied at a constant rate of strain of approximately 0.05 inch per minute. The results of these tests are presented below. DST SHEAR TEST RESULTS Sample Angle of Apparent Number Condition Internal Friction Cohesion T1 @ 2' -3' Remolded 31 degrees 200 pcf T10 @ 6' -7' Remolded 26 degrees 375 pcf T12 @ 7' -8' Remolded 11 degrees 275 pcf SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LEGEND UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SOIL DESCRIPTION I. COARSE GRAINED, more than half of material is lar znr than No. 200 sieve size. GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS o-r- fFian half of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 sieve size but smaller than 3 ". GROUP SYMBOL TYP: :AL NAMES GRAVELS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount of fines) SANDS CLEAN SANDS More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve size. SANDS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount of fines) II. FINE GRAINED, more than half of material is smaller than No. 200 sieve size. SILTS AND CLAYS GW Well graded gravels, gravel - less than 50 sand mixtures, little or no fines. GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel Liquid Limit sand mixtures, little or no greater than 50 fines. GM Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel -sand -silt mixtures. GC Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel -sand, clay mixtures. SW Well graded sand, gravelly sands, little or no fines. SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines. SM Silty sands, poorly graded sand and silty mixtures. SC Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures. ML Liquid Limit CL less than 50 OL SILTS AND CLAYS MN Liquid Limit CH greater than 50 OH HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT -i — Water level at time of excavation or as indicated _ US — Undisturbed, driven ring sample or tube sample <4SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA >- OIL TESTING,INC. Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt or clayey -silt -sand mixtures with slight plas- ticity. Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays. Organic silts and organic silty clays or low plasticity. Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts. Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. Organic clays of medium to high plasticity. Peat and other highly organic soils. CK — Undisturbed chunk sample BG — Bulk sample SP — Standard penetration sample IBY: CHC IDATE: 5 -22 -89 BEA:8921055 2 BG 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 End of Trench at 11.0' No Refusal SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL i TESTING,INC. Z W Z ¢ W > ¢ r < y � O < i Humid T U T r Z r y=j W N ¢ N Z < W 6 y � a = ¢ < O O U Very Dense T r N Z _ W � O � a T ¢ O W *� ¢ r F. Z y W O r Z O U Z W O r U � a ¢ Z U U SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG DGGEDBY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4_13 -89 DB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 3 Z o ° TRENCH NUMBERI _ _ T r < U Z j LL ELEVATION i a y y y W < < U OESCRIPTION D SM/ SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION, SC Brown to Light Brown, Frac- I tured Rock With Localized Weathering to SILTY CLAYEY SAND, METAVOLCANIC BEDROCK 2 BG 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 End of Trench at 11.0' No Refusal SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL i TESTING,INC. Z W Z ¢ W > ¢ r < y � O < i Humid T U T r Z r y=j W N ¢ N Z < W 6 y � a = ¢ < O O U Very Dense T r N Z _ W � O � a T ¢ O W *� ¢ r F. Z y W O r Z O U Z W O r U � a ¢ Z U U SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG DGGEDBY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4_13 -89 DB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 3 a ° TRENCH NUMBER2 F J U Z ELEVATION J i YI < < N U DESCRIPTION 0 1 I SC/ IFILLL, Brown to Light Brown, SM CLAYEY SILTY SAND With Rock Fragments 12 13 14 15 15 SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION, Brown to Light Brown, Frac- g �� tured, METAVOLCANIC BEDROCK 9 '� Z Near Refusal Z w Z ¢ W � ¢ H < N a O Humid � U F Z Z W W N ¢ y Z < W a a c 6 = ¢ < 0 0 U Medium Dense Very Dense H N 2 _ W �- O T ¢ 0 W � ¢ t- Z H N W f i 0 U Z W 0 � U < < � a ¢ 0 U SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG SOIL & TESTING,INC. LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 1 Plate No. 4 5 SC Brown to Light Brown, Frac- Humid Very tured, HETAVOLCANIC BEDROCK Dense 6 7 End of Trench at 7.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING,INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 5 o Z 0 NUMBER 3 Z W , T r t W A Z W _ F Z ¢ Z Z _ O = LL ELEVATION N .9 y Wo n y w i J O p Z yJ, a < U o U 'n DESCRIPTION 0 SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose SAND 1 CH SUBSOIL, Dark Reddish Brown, Humid Stiff BG SANDY CLAY 2 CL/ SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION, Humid Stiff CH Brown, Highly Weathered, 3 SANDY SILTY CLAY, METAVOL- CANIC BEDROCK BG 4 5 SC Brown to Light Brown, Frac- Humid Very tured, HETAVOLCANIC BEDROCK Dense 6 7 End of Trench at 7.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING,INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 5 End of Trench at a ° TRENCH NUMBER4 W _ = J O LL ELEVATION i u p n ~ a a o O N J = U DESCRIPTION — 0 W W O Z W SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Humid ¢ > SANDY, With Rock Fragments W 1 y CH SUBSOIL, Greyish Green, Medium 2 SANDY CLAY 3 CK 4 BG 5 a SM LUSARDI FORKATION, Greenish Humid 6 Tan, SILTY SAND 0 CK ¢ 7 BG 0 U End of Trench at Loose Stiff Dense 94.5 1 27.4 121.2 1 12.2 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG SOIL & TESTING,INC. LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 1 Plate No. 6 ~ ~ = Z H — W W O Z W N ¢ > W y a 0 Q ¢ p ¢ 0 U U 0 Loose Stiff Dense 94.5 1 27.4 121.2 1 12.2 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG SOIL & TESTING,INC. LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 1 Plate No. 6 _ a ° TRENCH NUMBERS = T ` W 7 r J U r = W O u ELEVATION i y n u y p O d y YI t 'r' U DESCRIPTION 0 SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry SAND I CL SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION, Humid Brown, SANDY SILTY CLAY, 2 Highly Weathered SM Brown to Light Brown, Frac- Humid tured Rock With Localized 3 Weathering to SILTY SAND, METAVOLCANIC BEDROCK 4 BG 5 � �\ J 6 7 8 End of Trench at 8.0' TRENCH NUMBER 6 0 SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry SAND I SM SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS, Humid BG Brown to Reddish Brown, Wea- 1 thered to SILTY SAND, META_ VOLCANIC BEDROCK �i UNWEATHERED, Brown to Grey, 3 !� jl Fractured, METAVOLCANIC BED- Re fusal at 3.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL TESTING,INC. Z T , r r Z Z W W y Q N Z t W y y p � = 2 Q 0 0 U Loose Stiff Very Dense Loose Dense Very Dense T r y Z W p u T S O W � G 7 Z r Z y W O r 0 U W 0 � F r U t t J p Q 0 U SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: �JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 Joe NU BER: 8921055 Plate No. 7 Q J ` — Fractured Rock 5 Near Refusal at 5.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL i TESTING,INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 JOB NU ER: 8921055 Plate No. 8 Z TRENCH NUMBER 7 W > Y _ �_ R _ o_ H < Z CC W W W q 2 Z M /- Z 1- U = J p W ELEVATION < q -C N W p v y W t i YI t t i 4 O � p � y ¢ p o t q U G U U U DESCRIPTION D SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose to SAND Medium 1 Dense BG 2 SM/ SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION, Humid Very CL Brown to Light Brown, Weath- Dense 3 ering to SILTY SAND to SANDY CK CLAY, METAVOLCANIC BEDROCK Q J ` — Fractured Rock 5 Near Refusal at 5.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL i TESTING,INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 JOB NU ER: 8921055 Plate No. 8 TRENCH NUMBERS r W r - W �? z W O - H r Z¢ W 7 ¢ Z Z W W N r Z N Z _ ¢ r r = J J V O LL ELEVATION r < y ¢ < y W u Z y W r U << 1 t < p < O Q ¢ i O ¢ 0 W a < N J U U U v DESCRIPTION 0 SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose SAND 1 CH SUBSOIL, Brown to Greyish Humid to Stiff Brown, SANDY CLAY Moist 2 3 SC LUSARDI FORMATION, Greenish Humid Dense 4 Tan With Rust Stains, CLAY - CK EY SAND 107.6 13.7 5 BG 6 End of Trench at 6.0' SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGGED Br: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 SOIL j[ TESTINGjINC. JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 9 Z TRENCH NUMBERS w > _ �_ T W a? w z Z ¢ z z z_ > = J O LL ELEVATION < w < y w c u 2 y w U << n < n N o < 1 ¢ t i n ¢ III y < 0 0 U Q U O U O DESCRIPTION 0 SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose SAND 1 CH SUBSOIL, Grey to Brown, Humid to Stiff BG SANDY CLAY Moist 2 3 Dense SM LUSARDI FORMATION, Greenish Humid 4 Tan to Brown, SILTY SAND 5 BG 6 K 110.6 18.4 7 8 9 10 End of Trench at 10.0' SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 SOIL A TESTING,INC. JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 10 4 5 6 BG 7 8 9 10 CK 118.6 6.2 11 End of Trench at 11.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL TESTING,INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED Br: ,]BR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 100 NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 11 Y % ° TRENCH NUMBER 10 Z } _ �_ W = o _ f Q W 7 = W W N Z W W > p. = W J U O u. ELEVATION < y K _N w _ o y W i a N a 0 a H a ~ a U1 U U U H v DESCRIPTION O CH SUBSOIL, Dark Brown, SANDY Humid Firm CLAY I SM LUSARDI FORMATION, Greenish Humid Dense Grey With Rust Stains Weath- 2 ered to SILTY SAND Occasional Caliche Stringers to 7' 3 4 5 6 BG 7 8 9 10 CK 118.6 6.2 11 End of Trench at 11.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL TESTING,INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED Br: ,]BR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 100 NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 11 a ° TRENCH NUMBER 11 Z W _ �_ W W a_ 1 ELEVATION < y y W C = y ~ U d d y y y d O d y d L¢ L > ~ 0 Z J d W g o V` U 0 U U u DESCRIPTION 0 SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose SAND -- SM SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION, Tan Humid Dense to With Rust Stains, Weathering Very 2 to SILTY SAND, METAVOLCANIC Dense BEDROCK 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Near Refusal at 9.0' SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 SOIL & TESTING,INC. JOB NU BER: 8921055 Plate No. 12 I3 dCK I I I I 1 109.6 I 17.2 4 SC/ LUSARDI FORMATION, Grey to Humid Dense CL Rust, CLAYEY SAND to SANDY to Moist 5 1 CLAY F= 17 - $ JCK I I I 1 1 122.3 1 10.2 19 110 End of Trench at 12.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL TESTING,INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 13 ° TRENCH NUMBER 72 = = _ W o _ < U Q W 7 W W N 2 W = J J ELEVATION i m i a W n u a W a 0 y 9L 6 W IL a 0 Z p m U U U V OESCRIPTION O SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose SAND 1 it SUBSOIL, Dark Reddish Brown Humid Stiff to Greyish Brown, SANDY CLAY to Moist 2 I3 dCK I I I I 1 109.6 I 17.2 4 SC/ LUSARDI FORMATION, Grey to Humid Dense CL Rust, CLAYEY SAND to SANDY to Moist 5 1 CLAY F= 17 - $ JCK I I I 1 1 122.3 1 10.2 19 110 End of Trench at 12.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL TESTING,INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 13 2 SC/ LUSARDI FORMATION, Grey Withl Humid Dense CL Rust Stains, SANDY CLAY to to Moist to Hard 3 1 CLAYEY SAND 14 . 15 . M of Trench at 6.0 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA <4> SOIL A TESTINGjINC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED sr: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 14 a °— TRENCH NUMBER13 W ~ W �? z - Y r ~ Q Z ¢ W Z Z ~ W W y = ? F W O ? F _ ELEVATION < y i y W - W F Z y U t i = ¢ } r = a W W ` t ` 0 0 U ¢ O U ¢ O U y u DESCRIPTION D CH SUBSOIL, Dark Brown to Brown i Humid Firm SANDY CLAY to Moist 2 SC/ LUSARDI FORMATION, Grey Withl Humid Dense CL Rust Stains, SANDY CLAY to to Moist to Hard 3 1 CLAYEY SAND 14 . 15 . M of Trench at 6.0 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA <4> SOIL A TESTINGjINC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED sr: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 14 a Z ° TRENCH NUMBER14 W ! H W aC F < U W ? W 2 W ' Q W J LL ELEVATION < N cc N y=j _ W H= U a a O < < O O O O U DESCRIPTION O CL/ SUBSOIL, Dark Brown to Brown Moist Stiff CH SANDY CLAY 1 2 3 CK 117.4 23.4 4 BG 5 6 SC/ SANTIAGO FORMATION, Grey to Humid SM Brown, Weathering to SILTY 7 SAND to CLAYEY SAND, META - Fense CK VOLCANIC BEDROCK 113.8 17.3 BG 8 Fractured Rock 9 -z'/ y/\ Dense Near Refusal at 8.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: ,JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 SOIL A TESTING,INC. Joe NUYBETI: 8921055 Plate No. 15 IM SC LUSARDI FORMATION, Greenish Humid Dense Tan to Rust, CLAYEY SAND 3 4 5 6 ICK 142.7 6.7 17 IIN End of Trench at 8.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING,INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 1 Plate No. 16 r ° TRENCH NUMBER 15 = W L) ? o Z w % F = w J 1 ELEVATION u a 0 a a =O ¢p G O ZO w W a ¢ y U OESCRIRTION U v O I CH SUBSOIL, Dark Reddish Brown, Humid Firm SANDY CLAY to Moist IM SC LUSARDI FORMATION, Greenish Humid Dense Tan to Rust, CLAYEY SAND 3 4 5 6 ICK 142.7 6.7 17 IIN End of Trench at 8.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING,INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 1 Plate No. 16 Z TRENCH NUMBER 16 w T f W de z W ~ Q U Z 2 W > Z Z W W 0 _ Z— — O z n ELEVATION t y < N W W u � ~ W y i v r u J n v0, v a a O n ¢ =0 ? ¢ O p w � 0 U O i U ¢ O U y V DESCRIPTION CL/ SUBSOIL, Dark Grey to Brown, Humid Firm to CH SANDY CLAY to Moist Stiff 1 2 CK 104.8 17.3 3 SM SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION, Tan Humid Dense 4 With Rust, Highly Weathered, to Very SILTY SAND, METAVOLCANIC Dense BEDROCK 5 6 CK 142.2 6.6 7 BG 8 9 End of Trench at 9.0' SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 SOIL & TESTINGgINC.. roe NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 17 -OI 111 WD 0C r� Ir m D M 171 -1 n 2r _0 ZD �Z D No n n 00 co w F co e V 4 4 US Stondord S /eves 36• 18` 2- 1" Yd' Yi' 010 ho 040 080 Hydrometer (MUwtes) Oro /n SIZO 01W PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS I BOULDER ICOBBLE3 i GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY Coons Fine lCoarse I Medium Fins (12 in.) 3in. T1 @ 2 -3 T11 @ 6 -7 T12 @ 7 -8 3/41n. No.4 N0.10 1410.41.1 no. cvv U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE (5004, naocr, �s e e 0 r v► C G C ia• m M z (A -4 Z a z M n s C- 0 < to C n s x o m m o a fD 00 a Lo 0 o N O C U9 (T cJ9 a � c N s r+ r 1 0 m � to cn —i N d a n CO, sD CO, tom—• ,5 min. tios 4 min. shin. 12 ZONE D 1 min. ZONE B • D/ o • • M. ( Structural Soil- Rock Fill ) / 5 min ZONE A O ZONE C O O O n P/l y ' o NOTES 1161N0 1. compacted Soil fill Shall contain at lust e0 percent ZONE A: Eoapacted loll fill. No rock fragments over 6 Inches In greatest Sol) Nees pasting 0/6 -Inch Sim". (by .eight), and dtmantlon. be compacted In sccerdawce with gaceflcatlont for ZONE I: Rocks 1 to a feet In ..mined dlmenslom placed In Structural fill, rumpacled toll fill conforming to ION( A. t. Ix6s over d feet IN erNmu• dlmmalleN not permitted 1011 C: Roots 6 Inches to t feet In maximum dimension uniformly dlstrl6u- 1n fill. led and .ell spared In co"aeted loll fill conforming to ZONE A. ZONE 0: Required for all !misting slope% 6:1 and sleeper, 90% min bum r ompactlon. ZONE A. I, or C material may be used for ZONE 0. ISO! ill 1111111111111111 eID11 IN' 1 010 01. The intent of these specifications is to establish procedures for clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to be filled, and placing and compacting fill soils to the lines and grades shown on the accepted plans. The recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report and /or the attached Special Provisions are a part of the Recomlended Grading Specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. These specifications shall only be used in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which they are a part. No deviation from these specifications will be allowed, except where specified in the geotechnical soil report or in other written communication signed by the Soil Engineer. r•.tia• • i1 �a, 1 Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., shall be retained as the Soil Engineer to observe and test the earthwork in accordance with these specifications. It will be necessary that the Soil Engineer or his representative provide adequate observation so that he may provide an opinion that the work was or was not accomplished as specified. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the soil engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes and new information and data so that he may provide these opinions. In the event that any unusual conditions not covered by the special provisions or preliminary soil report are encountered during the grading operations, the Soil Engineer shall be contacted for further recommendations. If, in the opinion of the Soil Engineer, substandard conditions are encountered, such as; questionable or unsuitable soil, unacceptable moisture (R -8/87) SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1989 Appendix, Page 2 content, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc., construction should be stopped until the conditions are remedied or corrected or he shall recommend rejection of this work. Test methods used to determine the degree of compaction should be performed in accordance with the following American Society for Testing and Materials test methods: Maximm, Density & Optimum Moisture Content - A.S.T.M. D- 1557 -78. Density of Soil In -Place - A.S.T.M. D- 1556 -64 or A.S.T.M. D -2922. All densities shall be expressed in terms of Relative Compaction as determined by the foregoing A.S.T.M. testing procedures. '471'•'• • � s 'SM a All vegetation, brush and debris derived from clearing operations shall be removed, and legally disposed of. All areas disturbed by site grading should be left in a neat and finished appearance, free from unsightly debris. After clearing or benching, the natural ground in areas to be filled shall be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, brought to the proper noisture content, compacted and tested for the minim,,,, degree of compaction in the Special Provisions or the recommendation contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report. All loose soils in excess of 6 inches thick should be removed to firm natural ground which is defined as natural soils which possesses an in -situ density of at least 90% of its maximum dry density. When the slope of the natural ground receiving fill exceeds 20% (5 horizontal units to 1 vertical unit), the original ground shall be stepped (R -8/87) SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1989 Appendix, Page 3 or benched. Benches shall be cut to a firm competent soil condition. The lower bench shall be at least 10 feet wide or 1 1/2 times the the equipment width which ever is greater and shall be sloped back into the hillside at a gradient of not less than two (2) percent. All other benches should be at least 6 feet wide. The horizontal portion of each bench shall be compacted prior to receiving fill as specified herein for compacted natural ground. Ground slopes flatter than 20% shall be benched when considered necessary by the Soil Engineer. Any abandoned buried structures encountered during grading operations must be totally removed. All underground utilities to be abandoned beneath any proposed structure should be removed from within 10 feet of the structure and properly capped off. The resulting depressions from the above described procedures should be backfilled with acceptable soil that is compacted to the requirements of the Soil Engineer. This includes, but is not limited to, septic tanks, fuel tanks, sewer lines or leach lines, storm drains and water lines. Any buried structures or utilities not to be abandoned should be brought to the attention of the Soil Engineer so that he may determine if any special recommendation will be necessary. All water wells which will be abandoned should be backfilled and capped in accordance to the requirements set forth by the Soil Engineer. The top of the cap should be at least 4 feet below finish grade or 3 feet below the bottom of footing whichever is greater. The type of cap will depend on the diameter of the well and should be determined by the Soil Engineer and /or a qualified Structural Engineer. Materials to be placed in the fill shall be approved by the Soil Engineer and shall be free of vegetable matter and other deleterious substances. (R -8/87) SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1989 Appendix, Page 4 Granular soil shall contain sufficient fine material to fill the voids. The definition and disposition of oversized rocks, expansive and /or detrimental soils are covered in the geotechnical report or Special Provisions. Expansive soils, soils of poor gradation, or soils with low strength characteristics may be thoroughly mixed with other soils to provide satisfactory fill material, but only with the explicit consent of the soil engineer. Any import material shall be approved by the Soil Engineer before being brought to the site. Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in layers not to exceed 6 inches in compacted thickness. Each layer shall have a uniform moisture content in the range that will allow the compaction effort to be efficiently applied to achieve the specified degree of compaction. Each layer shall be uniformly compacted to a minimum specified degree of compaction with equipment of adequate size to economically compact the layer. Compaction equipment should either be specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability. The minimum degree of compaction to be achieved is specified in either the Special Provisions or the recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation MU When the structural fill material includes rocks, no rocks will be allooed to nest and all voids must be carefully filled with soil such that the minimum degree of compaction recommended in the Special Provisions is achieved. The maximum size and spacing of rock permitted in structural fills and in non - structural fills is discussed in the geotechnical report, when applicable. Field observation and compaction tests to estimate the degree of compaction of the fill will be taken by the Soil Engineer or his representative. The (R-8/87) SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1989 Appendix, Page 5 location and frequency of the tests shall be at the Soil Engineer's discretion. when the compaction test indicates that a particular layer is less than the required degree of compaction, the layer shall be reworked to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer and until the desired relative compaction has been obtained. Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. Compaction by sheepsfoot rollers shall be at vertical intervals of not greater than four feet. In addition, fill slopes at ratios of two horizontal to one vertical or flatter, should be trackrolled. Steeper fill slopes shall be over -built and cut -back to finish contours after the slope has been constructed. Slope compaction operations shall result in all fill material six or more inches inward from the finished face of the slope having a relative compaction of at least 908 of maximum dry density or that specified in the Special Provisions section of this specification. The compaction operation on the slopes shall be continued until the Soil Engineer is of the opinion that the slopes will be stable in regard_ to surficial stability. Slope tests will be made by the Soils Engineer during construction of the slopes to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Where failing tests occur or other field problems arise, the Contractor will be notified that day of such conditions by written communication from the Soil Engineer or his representative in the form of a daily field report. If the method of achieving the required slope compaction selected by the Contractor fails to produce the necessary results, the Contractor shall rework or rebuild such slopes until the required degree of compaction is obtained, at no cost to the Owner or Soils Engineer. (R -8/87) SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1989 Appendix, Page 6 The Engineering Geologist shall inspect cut slopes excavated in rock or lithified formational material during the grading operations at intervals determined at his discretion. If any conditions not anticipated in the preliminary report such as perched water, seepage, lenticular or confined strata of a potentially adverse nature, unfavorably inclined bedding, joints or fault planes are encountered during grading, these conditions shall be analyzed by the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer to determine if mitigating measures are necessary. Unless otherwise specified in the geotechnical report, no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of the controlling governnental agency. Field observation by the Soil Engineer or his representative shall be made during the filling and compacting operations so that he can express his opinion regarding the conformance of the grading with acceptable standards of practice. The presence of the Soil Engineer or his representative or the observation and testing shall not release the Grading Contractor from his duty to compact all fill material to the specified degree of compaction. Fill shall not be placed during unfavorable weather conditions. When work is interrupted by heavy rain, filling operations shall not be resumed until the proper moisture content and density of the fill materials can be achieved. Damaged site conditions resulting from weather or acts of God shall be repaired before acceptance of work. (R -8/87) SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1989 Appendix, Page 7 Fa ATIVE C(MACPION: The minimum degree of compaction to be obtained in compacting natural ground, in the compacted fill, and in the compacted backfill shall be at least 90 percent. For street and parking lot subgrade, the upper six inches should be compacted to at least 958 relative compaction. EXPANSIVE SOILS: Detrimentally expansive soil is defined as clayey soil which has an expansion index of 50 or greater when tested in accordance with the Uniform Building Code Standard 29-C. OVERSIZED MATERIM: Oversized fill material is generally defined herein as rocks or lumps of soil over 6 inches in diameter. Oversize materials should not be placed in fill unless recommendations of placement of such material is provided by the soils engineer. At least 40 percent of the fill soils shall pass through a No. 4 U.S. Standard Sieve. TRANSITION LOIS: Where transitions between cut and fill occur within the proposed building pad, the cut portion should be undercut a minimum of one foot below the base of the proposed footings and recompacted as structural backf ill. In certain cases that would be addressed in the geotechnical report, special footing reinforcement or a combination of special footing reinforcement and undercutting tray be required. (R -8/87) ao'Fk nrE zan�Easemmr 4A.�J �ryES KE acs ✓za< rErnov PR a. RESIDENTIALSTREET-TYP NO SCALE - 1 ��. Jp \_ �30 -.EAFTHEN DAM- - KI ro T154,7 C3�� O�a zzo o Poo A,E,etir �� sueoa ro�t�an,- /.ease �- QUa$ ,�- / -� i—o- J �J v� _ 4 S 2 �9c/ Jp J23T13 2.0 'AC. If A EW MANHOLE .5 HEN �K11 tom.,. .. -✓ s: , C e en's _.'2. Uar` u M-.--- loj 3 Qua'f .i33 2.�J�`� \ 1 LEGEND / isp mm TRENCH LOCAT101 A \ E NON! i AS t � 'SRO �raxH�o�M,ro Ra. TS ire VICIMTY MAP Oal —` ALLUVIUM con�acr ts'� / ✓ ✓✓ --f aoniCUtrunn� nMO uxconraci'�EO Diu. tla_-1 / oxr Z1 _ z IF cr 9 Quaf Q( - z Ae m z z' 2' / \jl PR PARED,B �j y UPDATE REPORT CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -139 WILDFLOWER DRIVE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING 4407 MANCHESTER AVENUE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 — _ - - - - -- IF F ENCINIT PREPARED BY: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92120 Providing Professional Engineering Services Since 1959 STy SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA + SOIL &TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Street. San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego. CA 92160 -0627 619- 280 -0321. FAX 619 - 2804717 May 20, 1999 San Dieguito Engineering 4407 Manchester Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 ATTENTION: Mr. Steve Crosby SCS &T 9911093.1 SUBJECT: Update Report, City of Encinitas Tract No. 98 -139, Wildflower Drive, Encinitas, California. Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have prepared this update report for the subject project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject project will consist of a five lot residential subdivision, located at the south terminus of Wildflower Drive, in the City of Encinitas, California. The project consists of the development of four residential lots as well as associated utilities, and an access street. The fifth lot will be left unimproved. Grading will consist of cuts and fills up to about 24 feet - Proposed cut and/or fill slopes will be constructed at a 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter inclination, up to a maximum height of about 31 feet and 36 feet, respectively. To assist in the preparation of this report we were provided with a tentative parcel plan prepared by San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. dated December 18, 1998. In addition, we have reviewed the following reports prepared by Southern Califomia Soil and Testing, Inc.: 1) "Rippability Analysis for Deep Sewer Trench, Rancho De Mayo Subdivision;" May 21, 1990. 2) "Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Rancho De Mayo Subdivision, Tract 88 -351 RPV' May 24, 1989. SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Page No. 3 CONCLUSIONS Based on our review of the aforementioned grading plan and reports, as well as a site reconnaissance, it is our opinion that the recommendations provided in the referenced geotechnical report are still applicable and should be implemented. The following additional recommendations are intended to provide updated recommendations where appropriate. The following recommendations take precedence over any conflicting recommendations contained in the referenced report. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS SELECT GRADING: Highly expansive soils should not be placed within a horizontal distance of ten feet from the face of fill slopes. SURFACE DRAINAGE: The drainage around the proposed buildings should be designed to collect and direct surface water away from proposed structures and the top of slopes toward approved draining facilities. Rain gutters on the structures that discharge runoff away from the building are recommended. The ground around the proposed structures should be graded so that surface water flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. In general, we recommend that the ground adjacent to structures slope away at a gradient of at least two percent. Densely vegetated areas where runoff can be impaired should have a minimum gradient of at least five percent within the first five feet from the structure. The client should be advised that drainage patterns approved at the time of fine grading should be maintained throughout the life of the proposed structures. They should also be advised to limit site irrigation to the minimum necessary to sustain landscape growth. Should excessive irrigation, impaired drainage, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones of perched groundwater conditions may occur. EARTHWORK: All earthwork and grading contemplated for site preparation should be accomplished in accordance with the attached Recommended Grading Specifications and Special Provisions. All special site preparation recommendations presented in the sections above will supersede those in the standard Recommended Grading Specifications. All embankments, structural fill and fill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction at or slightly over optimum moisture content. Utility trench backfill within five feet of the proposed structures and beneath SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Page No. 4 pavements should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its maximum dry density. The upper twelve inches of subgrade beneath paved areas should be compacted to 95 percent of its maximum dry density. This compaction should be obtained by the paving contractor just prior to placing the aggregate base material and should not be part of the mass grading requirements. The maximum dry density of each soil type should be determined in accordance with ASTM Test D- 1557 -91, Method A or C. SLOPE STABILITY Proposed cut and/or fill slopes will be constructed at a 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) inclination to a maximum height of about 31 feet and 36 feet, respectively. It is our opinion that these slopes will possess an adequate factor -of -safety with respect to deep- seated gross stability, provided that the recommendations contained in the aforementioned geotechnical report, and this report are implemented (see Plate Number 1). FOUNDATION HORIZONTAL SETBACKS: Retaining wall footings located adjacent to or within slopes should be extended to a depth such that a minimum horizontal distance of ten feet exists between the face of the slope and the bottom of the footing. CONCRETE SLAB REINFORCEMENT: Minimum concrete slab reinforcement should consist of at least No. 3 bars placed at 18 inches on center each way. EXPANSIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The recommendations contained in this report, and the referenced geotechnical report reflect a nondetrimentally expansive condition resulting from a select grading operation. If such an operation is not performed revised recommendations will be needed. EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES PASSIVE PRESSURE: The passive pressure for the prevailing soil conditions may be considered to be 350 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. This pressure may be increased by one -third for seismic loading. The coefficient of friction for concrete to soil may be assumed to be 0.3 for the resistance to lateral movement. When combining frictional and passive resistance, the latter should be reduced by one - third. The upper 12 inches of soil should not be included in passive pressure calculations. SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Page No. 5 If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. �U Daniel B. Adl( r R.0 . 4360 DBA:mw cc: (6) Submitted NO,36037 \ FXN tF90W i} SLOPE STABILITY CALCULATIONS Janbu's Simplified Slope Stability Method �,Cq)_WHCTon FS -Nci( C ) Assume Homogeneous Strength Parameters throughout the slope .6 ( °) C(psf) W9(pcf) Incl. H (ft) FS 20 375 116 2:1 36 1.8 Where: 0 - Angle of Internal Friction C - Cohesion (psf) Ws = Unit weight of Soil (pcf) H = Height of Slope (ft) FS = Factor of Safety ' Cr SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1 SOIL A TESTING,INC. ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -139 lay: DBA oaT[: 5/20/99 wuraER: 9911093 1 PLATE: 1 ENDIX A SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 1 CITY OF ENCINITAS TRACT NO. 98 -139 WILDFLOWER DRIVE, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS - GENERAL PROVISIONS GENERAL INTENT The intent of these specifications is to establish procedures for clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to be filled, and placing and compacting fill soils to the lines and grades shown on the accepted plans. The recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report and/or the attached Special provisions are a part of the Recommended Grading Specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. These specifications shall only be used in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which they are a part. No deviation from these specifications will be allowed, except where specified in the geotechnical report or in other written communication signed by the Geotechnical Engineer. OBSERVATION AND TESTING Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc., shall be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer to observe and test the earthwork in accordance with these specifications. It will be necessary that the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative provide adequate observation so that he may provide his opinion as to whether or not the work was accomplished as specified. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the Geotechnical Engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes and new information and data so that he may provided these opinions. In the event that any unusual conditions not covered by the special provisions or preliminary geotechnical report are encountered during the grading operations. The Geotechnical Engineer shall be contacted for further recommendations. If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Engineer, substandard conditions are encountered, such as questionable or unsuitable soil, unacceptable moisture content, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc.; construction should be stopped until the conditions are remedied or corrected or he shall recommended rejection of this work. Tests used to determine the degree of compaction should be performed in accordance with the following American Society for Testing and Materials test methods: Maximum Density & Optimum Moisture Content - ASTM D- 1557 -91 Density of Soil In -Place - ASTM D- 1556 -90 or ASTM D -2922 SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 2 All densities shall be expressed in terms of Relative Compaction as determined by the foregoing ASTM testing procedures. PREPARATION OF AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL All vegetation, brush and debris derived from clearing operations shall be removed, and legally disposed of All areas disturbed by site grading should be left in a neat and finished appearance, free from unsightly debris. After clearing or benching the natural ground, the areas to be filled shall be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, brought to the proper moisture content, compacted and tested for the specified minimum degree of compaction. All loose soils in excess of 6 inches thick should be removed to firm natural ground which is defined as natural soils which possesses an in -situ density of at least 90 percent of its maximum dry density. When the slope of the natural ground receiving fill exceeds 20 percent (5 horizontal units to 1 vertical unit), the original ground shall be stepped or benched. Benches shall be cut to a firm competent formational soils. The lower bench shall be at least 10 feet wide or 1 -1/2 times the equipment width, whichever is greater, and shall be sloped back into the hillside at a gradient of not less than two percent. All other benches should be at least 6 feet wide. The horizontal portion of each bench shall be compacted prior to receiving fill as specified herein for compacted natural ground. Ground slopes flatter than 20 percent shall be benched when considered necessary by the Geotechnical Engineer. Any abandoned buried structures encountered during grading operations must be totally removed. All underground utilities to be abandoned beneath any proposed structure should be removed from within 10 feet of the structure and properly capped off. The resulting depressions from the above described procedure should be backfilled with acceptable soil that is compacted to the requirements of the Geotechnical Engineer. This includes, but is not limited to, septic tanks, fuel tanks, sewer lines or leach lines, storm drains and water lines. Any buried structures or utilities no to be abandoned should be brought to the attention of the Geotechnical Engineer so that he may determine if any special recommendation will be necessary. All water wells which will be abandoned should be backfilled and capped in accordance to the requirements set forth by the Geotechnical Engineer. The top of the cap should be at least 4 feet below finish grade or 3 feet below the bottom of footing whichever is greater. The type of cap will depend on the diameter of the well and should be determined by the Geotechnical Engineer and/or a qualified Structural Engineer. SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 3 FILL MATERIAL Materials to be placed in the fill shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer and shall be free of vegetable matter and other deleterious substances. Granular soil shall contain sufficient fine material to fill the voids. The definition and disposition of oversized rocks and expansive or detrimental soils are covered in the geotechnical report or Special Provisions. Expansive soils, soils of poor gradation, or soils with low strength characteristics may be thoroughly mixed with other soils to provide satisfactory fill material, but only with the explicit consent of the Geotechnical Engineer. Any import material shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer before being brought to the site. PLACING AND COMPACTION OF FILL Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in layers not to exceed 6 inches in compacted thickness. Each layer shall have a uniform moisture content in the range that will allow the compaction effort to be efficiently applied to achieve the specified degree of compaction. Each layer shall be uniformly compacted to the specified minimum degree of compaction with equipment of adequate size to economically compact the layer. Compaction equipment should either be specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability. The minimum degree of compaction to be achieved is specified in either the Special Provisions or the recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report. When the structural fill material includes rocks, no rocks will be allowed to nest and all voids must be carefully filled with soil such that the minimum degree of compaction recommended in the Special Provisions is achieved. The maximum size and spacing of rock permitted in structural fills and in non- structural fills is discussed in the geotechnical report, when applicable. Field observation and compaction tests to estimate the degree of compaction of the fill will be taken by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative. The location and frequency of the tests shall be at the Geotechnical Engineer's discretion. When the compaction test indicates that a particular layer is at less than the required degree of compaction, the layer shall be reworked to the satisfaction of the Geotechnical Engineer and until the desired relative compaction has been obtained. Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. Compaction by sheepsfoot roller shall be at vertical intervals of not greater than four feet. In addition, fill slopes at a ratio of two horizontal to one vertical or flatter, should be trackrolled. Steeper fill slopes shall be over -built and cut -back to finish contours after the slope has been constructed. Slope compaction operations shall result in SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 4 all fill material six or more inches inward from the finished face of the slope having a relative compaction of at least 90 percent of maximum dry density or the degree of compaction specified in the Special Provisions section of this specification. The compaction operation on the slopes shall be continued until the Geotechnical Engineer is of the opinion that the slopes will be surficially stable. Density tests in the slopes will be made by the Geotechnical Engineer during construction of the slopes to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Where failing tests occur or other field problems arise, the Contractor will be notified that day of such conditions by written communication from the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative in the form of a daily field report. If the method of achieving the required slope compaction selected by the Contractor fails to produce the necessary results, the Contractor shall rework or rebuild such slopes until the required degree of compaction is obtained, at no cost to the Owner or Geotechnical Engineer. CUT SLOPES The Engineering Geologist shall inspect cut slopes excavated in rock or lithified formational material during the grading operations at intervals determined at his discretion. If any conditions not anticipated in the preliminary report such as perched water, seepage, lenticular or confined strata of a potentially adverse nature, unfavorably inclined bedding, joints or fault planes are encountered during grading„ these conditions shall be analyzed by the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer to determine if mitigating measures are necessary. Unless otherwise specified in the geotechnical report, no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than the allowed by the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency. ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Field observation by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative shall be made during the filling and compaction operations so that he can express his opinion regarding the conformance of the grading with acceptable standards of practice. Neither the presence of the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative or the observation and testing shall not release the Grading Contractor from his duty to compact all fill material to the specified degree of compaction. SCS &T 9911093.1 May 20, 1999 Appendix A, Page 5 SEASON LIMITS Fill shall not be placed during unfavorable weather conditions. When work is interrupted by heavy rain, filling operations shall not be resumed until the proper moisture content and density of the fill materials can be achieved. Damaged site conditions resulting from weather or acts of God shall be repaired before acceptance of work. RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS - SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATIVE COMPACTION: The minimum degree of compaction to be obtained in compacted natural ground, compacted fill, and compacted backfill shall be at least 90 percent. For street and parking lot subgrade, the upper six inches should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. EXPANSIVE SOILS: Detrimentally expansive soil is defined as clayey soil which has an expansion index Of 50 or greater when tested in accordance with the Uniform Building Code Standard 29 -C OVERSIZED MATERIAL: Oversized fill material is generally defined herein as rocks or lumps of soil over 6 inches in diameter. Oversized materials should not be placed in fill unless recommendations of placement of such material is provided by the geotechnical engineer. At least 40 percent of the fill soils shall pass through a No. 4 U.S. Standard Sieve. TRANSITION LOTS: Where transitions between cut and fill occur within the proposed building pad, the cut portion should be undercut a minimum of one foot below the base of the proposed footings and recompacted as structural backfill. In certain cases that would be addressed in the geotechnical report, special footing reinforcement or a combination of special footing reinforcement and undercutting may be required. i> ra. rr I 1 B•. .. :UL - 81999 PREPARED FOR: ENGINEERING SERVICi CITY OF EN(;INITA Mr. Al F. Mayo 1682 Kettering Street Irvine, California 92714 Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. Post Office Box 20627 6280 Riverdale Street San Diego, California 92120 May 24, 1989 Mr. Al F. Mayo 1682 Kettering Street SCS &T 8921055 Irvine, California 92714 Report No. 1 SUBJECT: Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Rancho De Mayo Subdivision, Tract 88 -351 RPL, Encinitas, California. Dear Mr. Mayo: In accordance with your request, we have completed a geotechnical investigation for the subject project. The findings and reconmerldations of our study are presented herewith. The findings of this study indicate that the site is suitable for the proposed development provided the recommendations presented in the attached report are followed. The rnost significant geotechnical conditions affecting the proposed development is the presence of metavolcanic hardrock in various degrees of decomposition, highly expansive topsoils and expansive formational soils intermixed with nonexpansive soils. These conditions will require special grading consideration as described herein. If you have any questions after reviewing the findings and reconvendations contained in the attached report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUPI-IERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. Charles H. Christian, R.G.E. #00215 o C.E. #1237 CHC:JRH:mw cc: (3) Submitted (3) San Dieguito Engineering Inc. (1) SCS &T, Escondido it C8. 9i�9�� w " No. GE000215 r rr Exp. 9 -30 -89 �J rD GO of NO 1237 ERTIFIED N ENGINEERING S Cf P P ,A GEOLOGIST Tglf OFE C A�� \ 9�F 630-90 00" CA \- \1 $C.'y SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA T SOIL &TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Street, San Diego. CA 92120 PO. Box 600627. San Diego, CA 92160 -0627 619 -280 -4321, FAX 619 -280 -4717 May 24, 1989 Mr. Al F. Mayo 1682 Kettering Street SCS &T 8921055 Irvine, California 92714 Report No. 1 SUBJECT: Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Rancho De Mayo Subdivision, Tract 88 -351 RPL, Encinitas, California. Dear Mr. Mayo: In accordance with your request, we have completed a geotechnical investigation for the subject project. The findings and reconmerldations of our study are presented herewith. The findings of this study indicate that the site is suitable for the proposed development provided the recommendations presented in the attached report are followed. The rnost significant geotechnical conditions affecting the proposed development is the presence of metavolcanic hardrock in various degrees of decomposition, highly expansive topsoils and expansive formational soils intermixed with nonexpansive soils. These conditions will require special grading consideration as described herein. If you have any questions after reviewing the findings and reconvendations contained in the attached report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUPI-IERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. Charles H. Christian, R.G.E. #00215 o C.E. #1237 CHC:JRH:mw cc: (3) Submitted (3) San Dieguito Engineering Inc. (1) SCS &T, Escondido it C8. 9i�9�� w " No. GE000215 r rr Exp. 9 -30 -89 �J rD GO of NO 1237 ERTIFIED N ENGINEERING S Cf P P ,A GEOLOGIST Tglf OFE C A�� \ 9�F 630-90 00" CA \- \1 1 e. 11 lRUY�UY. 5 Introduction and Project Description ......... ..............................1 Project Scope ................................ ..............................2 Findings ..................................... ..............................3 Site Description ......................... ..............................3 General Geology and Subsurface Conditions ..............................4 Geologic Setting and Soil Description .............................4 Artificial Fill ( Quaf/ Qcaf) .... ..............................4 Topsoils and Subsoils .......... ..............................4 Alluvium ( Qal) ................. ..............................5 Lusardi Forndtion ( K1) ......... ..............................5 Santiago Peak Metavolcanics ( Jsp ) ............................5 Tectonic Setting .................... ..............................6 Geologic Hazards ......................... ..............................7 General............................. ..............................7 Groundshaking ....................... ..............................7 Groundwater ......................... ..............................7 Conclusions.................................. ..............................8 Recomne ndations.............................. ..............................8 Grading.................................. ..............................8 Site Preparation .................... ..............................8 Rippability Characteristics ......... ..............................9 RockDisposal ....................... ..............................9 U ndercutting........................ ..............................9 Select Grading for Expansive Soils .. .............................10 Surface Drainage .................... .............................10 Earth'. ark ........................... .............................10 SlopeStability .......................... .............................11 General............................. .............................11 Allowable Slope Height .............. .............................11 Fillslope Constructions ............ .............................12 Foundations and Interior Slabs ........... .............................12 General............................. .............................12 Reinforcement ....................... .............................12 Concrete Slabs ...................... .............................12 SpecialLots ........................ .............................13 Settlement Characteristics .......... .............................13 Expansive Characteristics ........... .............................13 Foundation Plan Review .............. .............................13 Earth Retaining Walls .................... .............................14 Passive Pressure .................... .............................14 Active Pressure ..................... .............................14 Backfill ............................ .............................14 Factor of Safety .................... .............................14 Limitations.................................. .............................15 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 3 Review, Observation and Testing .......... .............................15 Uniformity of Conditions ................. .............................15 Change In Scope .......................... .............................15 Time Limitations ......................... .............................16 Professional Standard .................... .............................16 Client's Responsibility .................. .............................16 Field Explorations ........................... .............................17 Laboratory Testing ........................... .............................17 NEW TO Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map, Follows Page 1 Plate 1 Plot Plan Plate 2 Subsurface Exploration Legend Plates 3 -17 Trench Logs Plate 18 Grain Size Distribution Plate 19 Rock Disposal Recommended Grading Specification and Special Provisions •!5• 7Y 1 1 }. •� RANCHO DE MAYO SUBDIVISION TRACT 88 -351 RPL ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 1 •.• 1 • II • •• 5 1 Y' 1• •: This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed Rancho De Mayo Residential Subdivision to be located south of Bumann Road, in the City of Encinitas, California. The site location is shown on the vicinity map provided as Figure Number 1 on the following page. It is our understanding that the site will be developed to receive a 23 lot residential subdivision. Proposed structures will be one and/or two stories high and of wood -frame construction. Shallow foundations as well as conventional slab -on -grade floor systems are anticipated. The proposed grading concept is to construct the interior streets and to construct individual building pads on each lot. Based on this, the grading will consist of cuts and fills less than about 20 feet deep. Proposed cut and fill slopes will have a maximum height of about 25 feet and 20 feet, respectively, and will have an inclination of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. To assist in the preparation of this report we were provided with a SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA prepared by San Dieguito Engineering Inc., SOIL &TESTING, INC. 1988. We were 6280 Riverdale Street, San Diego, CA 92120 map by San P0. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160 -0627 619 - 2804321. FAX 619 - 2804717 •!5• 7Y 1 1 }. •� RANCHO DE MAYO SUBDIVISION TRACT 88 -351 RPL ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 1 •.• 1 • II • •• 5 1 Y' 1• •: This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed Rancho De Mayo Residential Subdivision to be located south of Bumann Road, in the City of Encinitas, California. The site location is shown on the vicinity map provided as Figure Number 1 on the following page. It is our understanding that the site will be developed to receive a 23 lot residential subdivision. Proposed structures will be one and/or two stories high and of wood -frame construction. Shallow foundations as well as conventional slab -on -grade floor systems are anticipated. The proposed grading concept is to construct the interior streets and to construct individual building pads on each lot. Based on this, the grading will consist of cuts and fills less than about 20 feet deep. Proposed cut and fill slopes will have a maximum height of about 25 feet and 20 feet, respectively, and will have an inclination of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. To assist in the preparation of this report we were provided with a tentative map prepared by San Dieguito Engineering Inc., dated November 28, 1988. We were also provided with a new undated tentative map by San Dieguito *SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. r. CHC /EM I DATE: 5 -25 -89 OR NUMBER: 8921055 Fiaure No. 1 SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 2 Engineering that shows one less lot and a slightly smaller area within the subdivision. This map was used for our base map for our geologic map presented herewith as Plate Number 1. The site configuration, proposed grading and approximate locations of our subsurface explorations are shown on Plate Number 1 of this report. The investigation consisted of: surface reconnaissance, subsurface explorations, obtaining representative disturbed and undisturbed samples, laboratory testing, analysis of the field and laboratory data, research of available geological literature pertaining to the site, and preparation of this report. More specifically, the intent of this analysis was to: a) Explore the subsurface conditions to the depths influenced by the proposed construction. b) Evaluate, by laboratory tests, the pertinent engineering properties of the various strata which will influence the develop- ment, including their bearing capacities, expansive characteris- tics, settlement potential and rippability characteristics. c) Describe the general geology at the site including possible geologic hazards which could have an effect on the site development. d) Address potential construction difficulties such as rippability of rock materials and provide recommendations concerning these problems. e) Develop soil engineering criteria for site grading and provide design information regarding the stability of cut and fill slopes. f) Recamiend an appropriate foundation system for the type of structures anticipated and develop soil engineering design criteria for the recommended foundation design. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 3 N M CY:.Y�iiLY��:I The subject site is an irregular shaped parcel of land located near the southern terminus of Rancho De Mayo in the Olivenhain area of Encinitas, California. The site covers approximately 52.5 acres and is bounded by undeveloped land on the south and east and residential property as well as undeveloped land on the north and west. Topographically, the site is comprised of hilly terrain with well incised drainage courses located on the eastern, western, southern and central portions of the site. Elevations range from approximately 315 feet (MSL) at the southern boundary to approximately 110 feet (MSL) at the most eastern boundary of the site. Slopes range from very gentle to relatively steep, with sore inclination being on the order of 1 to 1 ( horizontal to vertical) . Drainage is accomplished via sheetflow and in the well incised drainage courses. It should be noted that an earthen dam and a few earthen dikes have been constructed across two of the drainage courses on the central and eastern portions of the site, respectively. In addition, another earthen dam exists immediately off -site and adjacent to the northern property boundary. The locations of the dam and dikes are indicated on Plate Number 1. No water was noted in the drainage courses, but dense vegetation which would indicate near surface mnisture exists within the two water retention areas which have been dammed. Vegetation consists of native grasses and weeds with the denser brush and trees located within drainage courses. The site was previously used for agricultural purposes and large boulders cleared from the cultivated areas have been placed in piles throughout the site. These piles of large boulders and soil are indicated on Plate Number 1 as undocumented fill (Quaf). Previous grading on site has also resulted in two large pads being constructed on the southern portion of the site. No structures were noted on site, however overhead utility lines were noted along the western property line and a sewer manhole was noted on the SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 4 western portion of the site. The sewer manhole is located in a concrete slab and the location is shown on Plate Number 1. The direction in which the sewer main traverses was not determined. GEmmIc sETmc AND SOIL DESCRIi'I' m The subject site is located near the boundary between the Coastal Plains and Foothills Physiographic Province of San Diego County and is underlain by Jurassic -age Santiago Peak Meta - volcanics, Cretaceous -age Lusardi Formation, Quaternary -age alluvium, associated residuum and artificial fill. A brief description of soil units are presented below and the approximate limits of them are indicated on Plate Number 1. ARTIFICIAL FILL (Quaf /Qcaf): The fills noted on site consist of nonengineered agricultural fill (Quaf) and engineered fill (Qcaf). The engineered fill is located on the two large pads located on the southern portion of the site. We understand that the fill was placed in 1982 under the observation of San Dieguito soils, Inc., however, we have not been provided with documentation verifying this understanding. The engineered fill appears to range up to approximately ten feet in thickness and is comprised of humid, medium dense, brown to light brown, silty sand and clayey sand with some rock fragments. The agricultural fills consists of an earthen dam and small dikes as well as stockpiles of soils and large boulders which have been cleared from the cultivated areas. Some of this fill has been indicated on Plate Number 1. However, isolated areas of unidentified agricultural fills are anticipated to exist on site and should be exposed during the development of this site. These fills appear to range up to approximately seven feet in thickness and are not suitable, in their present condition, to receive settlement sensitive structures or fills. TOPSOILS AND SUBSOILS: The topsoils and subsoils range to depths of approximately six feet below the existing ground surface. The topsoils SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 5 typically consist of loose, humid, brown to dark brown, silty sand and clayey sand. The underlying subsoils are generally highly expansive, humid and medium stiff to stiff, brown to grey brown clay and sandy clay. ALLUVITA (Qal): The alluvium noted on site is located in the narrow confines of the drainage courses and in the water retention reservoirs behind the two earthen dams shown on Plate Number 1. The thicknesses of alluvium is anticipated to be between approximately two feet and eight feet and comprised of loose, humid, mixtures of gravels, cobbles, sands and clays. LUSARDI FORMATION (R1): The central northern and central western portions of the site are underlain by the Lusardi Formation. The Lusardi Formation was encountered underlying the topsoils and subsoils at depths ranging from approximately one foot to 5.5 feet below the existing grades. The Lusardi Formation on site consists of dense to very dense, greenish tan, grey and rusty brown, silty sand and clayey sand to sandy clay. The silty sands typically have relatively good strength parameters, however, the sandy clays have relatively low shear strengths. If the clays are exposed in cut slopes shallow, surficial slope stability will need to be addressed. It is recommended that a qualified engineering geologist observe all cut slopes during the proposed development. SANTIAGO PEAR METAVOLCANICS (Jsp): The approximate limits of the Santiago Peak Metavolcanic bedrock is indicated on Plate Number 1. The upper contact of this formation was encountered at depths ranging from the ground surface to approximately six feet below the existing grades. The Santiago Peak Metavolcanic bedrock is comprised of fractured hardrock which weathers to a fine, silty, clayey soils with angular rock fragments. The highly fractured weathered bedrock ranges from approximately one foot to eleven feet in thickness. Underlying the highly fractured and weathered metavolcanics, the bedrock becomes less SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 6 fractured and very dense hardrock. Excavation refusal with the backhoe was encountered at depths as shallow as three feet below the ground surface. Unless the Santiago Peak Metavolcanic bedrock is highly fractured and weathered, typically light trenching equipment cannot excavate this bedrock material. It should be noted that isolated hardrock floaters within rippable materials are anticipated to exist on site. The size or locations of these hardrock floaters are not readily identifiable but should be anticipated to be encountered during grading. TfJC7C UC SEWING: No faults are known to traverse the subject site but it should be noted that much of Southern California, including the San Diego County, area is characterized by a series of Quaternary -age fault zones which typically consist of several en echelon faults that generally strike in a northerly to northwesterly direction. Some of these fault zones (and the individual faults within the zone) are classified as active while others are classified as only potentially active according to the criteria of the California Division of Mines and Geology. Active fault zones are those which have shown conclusive evidence of faulting during the Holocene Epoch (the most recent 11,000 years) while potentially active fault zones have demonstrated movement during the Pleistocene Epoch (11,000 to 2 million years before the present) but no movement during Holocene time. A review of available geologic maps indicates that the site is approximately 10 miles east of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. Recent earthquake activity along faults in the southern extension of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone indicate that this zone could be classified as active. The recent seismic events along a small portion of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone generated earthquakes of magnitude 4.0 or less. Other active fault zones in the region that could possibly affect the site include the Coronado Banks and San Clemente Fault Zones to the west and the Elsinore and San Jacinto Fault Zones to the northeast. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 7 r' a'�rii_efT�t±�.9 GENERAL: The site is located in an area which is relatively free of potential geologic hazards. Hazards such as tsunamis, seiches, and landsliding should be considered negligible or nonexistent. GROUNDSHARING: The most likely geologic hazard to affect the site is groundshaking as a result of movement along one of the major, active fault zones mentioned above. The maximum bedrock accelerations that would be attributed to a maximum probable earthquake occurring along the nearest portion of selected fault zones that could affect the site are sunn arized in the following table. Earthquakes on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone is expected to be relatively minor. Major seismic events are likely to be the result of movement along the San Jacinto or Elsinore Fault Zones. GROUNDWATER: No groundwater was encountered during our subsurface exploration and we do not anticipate any major groundwater related problems, either during or after construction. However, depending on the season of the year when grading is accomplished, saturated soils may be encountered within the drainage courses and within the water retention areas which are dammed at the present. In addition, it should be recognized that minor groundwater seepage problems may occur after development of a site even where none were present before development. These are usually minor Maximim Probable Bedrock Design Fault Zone Distance Earthquake Acceleration Acceleration Rose Canyon 10 miles 6.0 magnitude 0.26 g 0.18 g Elsinore 23 miles 7.3 magnitude 0.21 g 0.14 g San Jacinto 44 miles 7.3 magnitude 0.14 g 0.10 g Earthquakes on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone is expected to be relatively minor. Major seismic events are likely to be the result of movement along the San Jacinto or Elsinore Fault Zones. GROUNDWATER: No groundwater was encountered during our subsurface exploration and we do not anticipate any major groundwater related problems, either during or after construction. However, depending on the season of the year when grading is accomplished, saturated soils may be encountered within the drainage courses and within the water retention areas which are dammed at the present. In addition, it should be recognized that minor groundwater seepage problems may occur after development of a site even where none were present before development. These are usually minor SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 8 phenomena and are often the result of an alteration of the permeability characteristics of the soil, an alteration in drainage patterns and an increase in irrigation water. Based on the permeability characteristics of the soil and the anticipated usage of the development, it is our opinion that any seepage problems which may occur will be minor in extent. It is further our opinion that these problems can be most effectively corrected on an individual basis if and when they develop. Based on the results of this investigation, it is our opinion that the site may be developed as proposed, provided the recommendations presented in this report are complied with. The most significant geotechnical conditions exposed that will affect site development is the presence of hard rock in portions of the site that may require blasting or difficult excavation, and the presence of moderately to highly expansive topsoils and some strata of moderately expansive sedimentary deposits. These conditions are discussed further in the appropriate sections below. In addition, two pads have already been constructed that contain what we believe to be engineered fills (Qcaf). In order for these fills to be allowed to remain, it will be necessary to obtain documentation, by the soils engineer who tested and observed the placement of these fills, that the fills were properly placed and are suitable to support settlement sensitive structures. If this documentation cannot be obtained, the fills will need to be removed and replaced under our observation. SITE pREPARATICNS: The site preparation should begin with the removal of all vegetation and other materials determined by the soil engineer to be detrimental to structural fills, from areas to be graded and /or to receive improvements. This material should be disposed of off -site. Once this is SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 9 accomplished, the areas to be graded should be stripped of all loose topsoils, subsoils and alluvial deposits to firm formational soils and be replaced as structural fill. The existing undocumented fills should also be removed, including the small dikes and drainage retention structures. RIPPABILITY CHARACTERISTICS: Several of our backhoe trenches encountered refusal on hard rocky materials at relatively shallow depths. These trenches were in the areas mapped as being underlain by metavolcanic rock (Jsp). The shallowest hard rock appears to be located in two general areas. one area is the knoll in the vicinity of Lots 11, 15 and 16 (see Trench Numbers 6, 7 and 11) . The second area is now off -site in the knoll in the vicinity of Trench Number 14. Cuts in these areas will require heavy ripping and nay require some blasting. The materials generated by blasting and where heavy ripping is necessary will most likely consist of fractured rock with few fines. Some of the rock produced by blasting may be oversized for use in structural fills and may need to be placed in nonstructural fill areas, or be split into smaller sizes. Placement of oversize rock in fills is discussed below. ROCK DISPOSAL: It is anticipated that oversize rock will be generated during grading operations. Oversized rock is defined as rock over 24 inches in diameter. This material may be utilized for landscaping purposes, exported from the site or be split into pieces smaller than two feet in maximum dimension, and incorporated in structural fills. Rock between six inches and two feet in maximum dimension should be placed in accordance with the specifications presented on Plate Number 19 and should be placed such that no nesting occurs and the soil surrounding the rock is properly compacted. In addition, oversized material may be placed in structural fills as indicted on Plate Number 19. LMDERCLY TIM: It is reconmended that the cut portions of daylight lots and all lots that required blasting and /or heavy ripping be undercut to a depth of three feet below finish grade. Further, streets that pass through hand SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 10 rock areas should be undercut such that the underground utilities can be installed. As an alternative to undercutting the entire street, selected areas may be undercut and the deepest trenches may be concentrated there. All undercut areas should be filled with properly compacted, nondetrimentally expansive soils. SE[F)CP GRADING FOR EXPANSIVE SOILS: The topsoils and subsoils overlying the Lusardi Formation (K1) were found to have high to very high expansive potential. In addition, some of the soils within the Lusardi Formation and some of the highly weathered metavolcanic rock material were found to be moderately expansive. In order to use standard foundation and slab design, we recommend that soils with high and very high expansive potential not be allowed within four feet of finish pad grade. Moderately expansive soils should not be allowed within three feet of finish grade. where expansive soils occur naturally within these limits, they should be removed and be replaced with nondetrimentally expansive soil. When used in fill, expansive soils should be placed only below the limits recommended above. if it is desired not to use select grading to mitigate the expansive soil conditions, special foundation and slab design will be necessary. Such design recommendations should be made on a lot by lot basis after grading when it can be determined to what extent the expansive soils will exist. SURFACE DRAINAGE: It is recommended that all surface drainage be directed away from the structures and that ponding of water not be allowed adjacent to their foundation. EmmiWORR: All earthwork and grading contemplated for site preparation should be accomplished in accordance with the attached Recommended Grading Specifications and Special Provisions. All special site preparation recom-endations presented in the sections above will supersede those in the standard Recomuended Grading Specifications. All embankments, structural fill and fill should be compacted to at least 90% relative compaction at or slightly over optimamn moisture content. Utility trench backfill within five feet of the proposed structures and beneath asphalt pavements should be SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 11 compacted to minimum of 90% of its maximum dry density. The upper twelve inches of subgrade beneath paved areas should be compacted to 95% of its maximum dry density. This compaction should be obtained by the paving contractor just prior to placing the aggregate base material and should not be part of the mass grading requirements. The maximum dry density of each soil type should be determined in accordance with A.S.T.M. Test Method o-1557 -78, Method A or C. GENERAL: The native soils on -site are predominantly sandy and/or rock like materials of sedimentary or metavolcanic origin. The rock materials will have extremely high strength parameters in both cut and fill slopes. However, with the metavolcanic rock, fines will probable need to be mixed with the rock fragments to produce a corrpactable material. The stability of fill slopes will therefore be affected by the strength of the matrix material. The sands of the Lusardi Formation have relatively high strength parameters in both cut and fill slopes. The clayey topsoils and subsoils have relatively weak strength parameters and should not be allowed within a distance from the face of fill slopes equal to three - fourths the slope height. The clayey portions of the Lusardi Formation also have relatively weak strength parameters. These soils should not be placed in fills near the face of the slope and should not be allowed in cut slopes over 15 feet high. If exposed in higher cut slopes, buttressing may be necessary. It should be determined during grading if buttressing is necessary and what the shape of the buttress should be. ALLa?mSLE s[oPE HEIGHT: Cut slopes made in the metavolcanic rock to the maximum planned height of 25 feet will have a factor -of- safety well above the standard of 1.5 in regards to deep - seated failure or surficial failure. All cut slopes in this material should, however, be observed by a member of our engineering geology staff for evidence of adverse joint patterns or unstable rock loosened by the excavation. The proposed cut slopes in the Lusardi Formation, for the height of 15 feet or less at an inclination of SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 12 2:1, will also have a factor -of- safety in excess of the minimum friction of 1.5. Fill slopes constructed on the silty sands and clayey sands of the Lusardi Formation and /or the rocky materials obtained from cuts in the metavolcanic rock, that are made at a slope inclination of 2.0 horizontal to 1.0 vertical for the maximum proposed height of 20 feet, will have a factor -of- safety of at least 1.5 for deep seated (rotational) and surficial failures. FILL SLOPE COMS'I UCTICNS: All fill slopes should be compacted by back - rolling with a sheepsfoot roller at intervals of four feet or less. Once completed, the fill slopes should be track - rolled to compact the near surface soils. No surface run -off should be allowed to flow over the top of slopes and the slopes should be planted with erosion resistant landscaping. Iceplant types of groundcover should not be used on slopes. GENERAL: Provided no detrimentally expansive soils will exist on the building pads, within the limits discussed above under "Select Grading", conventional shallow footings can be used for the support of the proposed structures. Footings should be founded at least 12 inches and 18 inches below lowest adjacent finished pad grade for one and two -story structures, respectively. The minimum width for continuous and isolated footings should be 12 inches and 24 inches, respectively. Such footings may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 psf. The bearing pressure may be increased by one -third when considering wind and /or seismic loading. REINhuRcE1dT: It is recommended that minimum reinforcement consist of at least two No. 5 reinforcing bars, one located near the top of the footings and one near the bottom. This reinforcement is based on soil characteristics and is not intended to be in lieu of reinforcement necessary to satisfy structural considerations. CONCRETE SLABS: Concrete on -grade slabs should have a minimum actual thickness of four inches and be reinforced with No. 3 reinforcing bars SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 13 placed at 36 inches on center each way. A 6 "x6 "- W1.4xW1.4 welded wire mesh may be utilized in lieu of the reinforcement bars. It is imperative that slab reinforcing be properly placed near the middle of the slab in order to be effective. A four - inch -thick layer of coarse, poorly graded sand or rock should be placed underneath the slab. Where moisture- sensitive floor coverings are planned, the slab should also be underlain by a visqueen moisture barrier over the sand blanket with one -inch -thick layer of clean sand provided above the visqueen to allow proper concrete curing. SPECIAI, IAPS: Special lots are defined as daylight lots where the fill thickness exceeds 10 feet, and fill lots where the fill differential exceeds 15 feet. For these lots, minimum foundation reinforcement should be increased to two No. 5 reinforcing bars near the top of the footing and two near the bottom. In addition, minimum slab -on -grade reinforcement should be increased to No. 3 reinforcing bars placed at 24 inches on center each way or a 6 "x6 "- W2.9xW2.9 welded wire mesh. SEITiEMERr CHARACTERISTICS: The anticipated total and /or differential settlements for the proposed structure may be considered to be within tolerable limits provided the recommendations presented in this report are followed. It should be recognized that minor cracks normally occur in concrete slabs and foundations due to shrinkage during curing or redistribution of stresses and some cracks may be anticipated. Such cracks are not necessarily an indication of excessive vertical movements. EXPANSIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The recommendations contained in this report assume that nondetrimentally expansive conditions will exist after grading is complete. If this is not the case, revised recommendations will be necessary. FOIAd]Anm PLAN REVIEW: The foundation plan should be submitted to this office for review to ascertain that the recommendation provided in this report have been implemented and the assumptions utilized in preparing this report are still applicable. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 14 PASSIVE PRESSURE: The passive pressure for the prevailing soil conditions may be considered to be 350 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. This pressure may be increased one -third for seismic loading. The coefficient of friction for concrete to soil may be assumed to be 0.40 for the resistance to lateral movement. When combining frictional and passive resistance, the friction value should be reduced by one - third. The upper six inches of soil adjacent to exterior retaining wall footings should not be included in passive pressures calculations. ACTIVE PRESSURE: The active soil pressure for the design of earth retaining structures with level backfills may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing 35 pounds per cubic foot for walls free to move at the top (unrestrained walls). An additional 15 pounds per cubic foot should be assumed for 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) sloping backfill. These pressures do not consider any other surcharge. If any other are anticipated, this office should be contacted for the necessary increase in soil pressure. This value assumes a drained backfill condition. Waterproofing and wall drainage details should be provided by the project architect. SACKFUL: All backfill soils should be compacted to at least 908 relative compaction. Expansive or clayey soils should not be used for backfill material. The wall should not be backfilled until the masonry has reached an adequate strength. FACTOR OF SAFETY: The above values, with the exception of the allowable soil friction coefficient do not include a factor of safety. Appropriate factors of safety should be incorporated into the design to prevent the walls from overturning and sliding. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 15 r+ r r:.ti: • mn n :o. The recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon our review of final plans and specifications. Such plans and specifications should be made available to the soil engineer and engineering geologist so that they may review and verify their compliance with this report and with Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code. It is recommended that Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. be retained to provide continuous soil engineering services during the earthwork operations. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to start of construction. The recommendations and opinions expressed in this report reflect our best estimate of the project requirements based on an evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions encountered at the subsurface exploration locations and the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from those encountered. It should be recognized that the performance of the foundations and /or cut and fill slopes may be influenced by undisclosed or unforeseen variations in the soil conditions that may occur in the intermediate and unexplored areas. Any unusual conditions not covered in this report that may be encountered during site development should be brought to the attention of the soils engineer so that he may make modifications if necessary. r r r : vr.• This office should be advised of any changes in the project scope or proposed site grading so that it may be determined if the recommendations contained herein are appropriate. This should be verified in writing or modified by a written addendum. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 iY1ul 11 'NOMNI Page 16 The findings of this report are valid as of this date. Changes in the condition of a property can, however, occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the work of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in the State -of- the - Practice and /or Government Codes may occur. Due to such changes, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or in part by changes beyond our control. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after a period of two years without a review by us verifying the suitability of the conclusions and recomrendations. IS:�:�'rQV � r. y. 1 . •.1 In the performance of our professional services, we comply with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in the same locality. The client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at the locations where our borings, surveys, and explorations are made, and that our data, interpretations, and recommendations are based solely on the information obtained by us. we will be responsible for those data, interpretations, and recomrendations, but shall not be responsible for the interpretations by others of the information developed. our services consist of professional consultation and observation only, and no warranty of any kind whatsoever, express or implied, is made or intended in connection with the work performed or to be performed by us, or by our proposal for consulting or other services, or by our furnishing of oral or written reports or findings. It is the responsibility of Mr. Al F. Mayo, or his representatives to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the engineer and architect for the project and incorporated SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 17 into the project's plans and specifications. It is further his responsibility to take the necessary measures to insure that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out such recommendations during construction. Fourteen subsurface explorations were made at the locations indicated on the attached Plate Number 1 on April 13 and 14, 1989. These explorations consisted of trenches dug by means of a backhoe. The field work was conducted under the observation of our engineering geology personnel. The explorations were carefully logged when made. These logs are presented on the following Plates Number 3 through 17. The soils are described in accordance with the Unified Soils Classification System as illustrated on the attached simplified chart on Plate 2. In addition, a verbal textural description, the wet color, the apparent moisture and the density or consistency are provided. The density of granular soils is given as either very loose, loose, medium dense, dense or very dense. The consistency of silts or clays is given as either very soft, soft, medium stiff, stiff, very stiff, or hard. Disturbed and "undisturbed" samples of typical and representative soils were obtained and returned to the laboratory for testing. Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with the generally accepted American Society for Testing and Materials (A.S.T.M.) test methods or suggested procedures. A brief description of the tests performed is presented below: a) CLASSIFI=CN: Field classifications were verified in the laboratory by visual examination. The final soil classifications are in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 b) NDISTURE- DENSITY: Field moisture content and dry density were determined for representative sanples obtained. This information was an aid to classification and permitted recognition of variations in material consistency with depth. The dry unit weight is determined in pounds per cubic foot, and the field moisture content is determined as a percentage of the soil's dry weight. The results are summarized in the trench logs. C) GAIN SIZE DIS RIBLY ION: The grain size distribution was determined for representative sanQles of the native soils in accordance with A.S.T.M. Standard Test D-422. The results of these tests are presented on Plate Number 18. d) OCMPACTICN TEST: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical soils were determined in the laboratory in accordance with A.S.T.M. Standard Test D- 1557 -78, Method A. The results of these tests are presented below. e) EXPANSION INDEX TEST: Expansion index tests on rermlded samples were performed on representative samples of soils likely to be present at finish grade. The tests were performed on the portion of the samples passing the #4 standard sieve. The samples were brought to optimum moisture content then dried back to a constant moisture content for 12 hours at 230 +/- 9 degrees Fahrenheit. Optimum Sample Maximun Moisture Number Description Density Content T 1 @ 2-3' Clayey Silty Sand 116.7 pcf 13.3% Tll @ 6' -7' Very Silty Sand 109.0 pcf 18.19 T12 @ 7' -8' Sandy Clay/Clayey Sand 123.1 pcf 10.5% e) EXPANSION INDEX TEST: Expansion index tests on rermlded samples were performed on representative samples of soils likely to be present at finish grade. The tests were performed on the portion of the samples passing the #4 standard sieve. The samples were brought to optimum moisture content then dried back to a constant moisture content for 12 hours at 230 +/- 9 degrees Fahrenheit. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1988 Page 19 The specimens were then compacted in a 4- inch - diameter mold in two equal layers by means of a tamper, then trimred to a final height of 1 inch, and brought to a saturation of approximately 50 %. The specimens vere placed in a consolidometer with porous stones at the top and bottom, a total normal load of 12.63 pounds was placed (144.7 psf), and the samples were allowed to consolidate for a period of 10 minutes. The samples were allowed to become saturated, and the change in vertical movement was recorded until the rate of expansion became nominal. The expansion index test results are reported below as the total vertical displacement times the fraction of the sample passing the #4 sieve times 1000. CLASSIFICATION OF EXPANSIVE SOIL EXPANSION INDEX PO'T'ENTIAL EXPANSION 1 -20 very low 21 -50 low 51 -90 medium 91 -130 high Above 130 very high Initial Interior Final Sample Moisture Density Moisture Expansion Number % Ecf % Index Classification T1 @ 2-3' 10.8 106.1 21.4 20 Very Low T3 @ 3' -4' 11.2 105.5 26.5 70 Medium T4 @ 2' -3' 14.0 95.6 35.6 145 very High T8 @ 4' -5' 9.6 111.5 19.8 40 Low T12 @ 1-2' 13.4 98.2 31.3 127 High T12 @ 7' -8' 10.3 108.8 22.8 63 Medium SCS &T 6921055 May 24, 1988 Page 20 f) DIRECT SHEAR TESTS: Direct shear tests were performed on samples of the native soils remolded to 90 percent relative compaction to determine the failure envelope based on yield shear strength. The shear box was designed to accomodate a sample having diameters of 2.375 inches or 2.50 inches and a height of 1.0 inch. Samples were tested at different vertical loads and a saturated moisture content. The shear stress was applied at a constant rate of strain of approximately 0.05 inch per minute. The results of these tests are presented below. DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Sample Angle of Apparent Number Condition Internal Friction Cohesion T1 @ 2' -3' Remolded 31 degrees 200 pcf T10 @ 6' -7' Remolded 26 degrees 375 pcf T12 @ 7' -8' Remolded 11 degrees 275 pcf l✓ c wao�c:a ®eu�e��✓r __...� '� v�< w.. 'vd aCw °wd woctr v�a"�.�m au' 4'w'v?r..,9' ,cc ua t secn>� - d NO SCALE jrp "o _T14 \' a L I isr JN0.4 ?Y am //" / J � 2e •� \� _� �"� � �� t y /i� R "�� a }/n - i 23 13 �c� .�, / / 2.0 °AC ti� jK. —_y MANHOLE J °p L :N Oe�e x c7 a o �a �w AC N Y� d I I0 � F.. 1 's.�':G7v.. Mi �° �i �� N Q' m � � � � � � � yr m � � ✓��7 �� C.esat aar�dsa " j 2> a dy KI XI M LW �C %" "a" �aN 21 _ � �xvudkp � ��– 2 SITE C\NoTY MAP 0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LEGEND UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SOIL DESCRIPTION GROUP SYMBOL TYPICAL NAMES I. COARSE GRAINED, more than half Standard penetration sample than No. 200 sieve size. of material is lar er than SILTS AND CLAYS ML No. 200 sieve size. fine sands, rock flour, sandy GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS GW Well graded gravels, gravel - ore than half of mixtures with slight plas- sand mixtures, little or no coarse fraction is Liquid Limit CL fines. larger than No. 4 GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel sieve size but clays, sandy clays, silty sand mixtures, little or no smaller than 3 ". OL fines. GRAVELS WITH FINES GM Silty gravels, poorly graded MH (Appreciable amount gravel -sand -silt mixtures. or diatomaceous fine sandy of fines) GC Clayey gravels, poorly silts. graded gravel -sand, clay CH Inorganic clays of high greater than 50 mixtures. SANDS CLEAN SANDS SW Well graded sand, gravelly More than half of to high plasticity. sands, little or no fines. coarse fraction is Peat and other highly SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly smaller than No. 4 sands, little or no fines. sieve size. SANDS WITH FINES SM Silty sands, poorly graded (Appreciable amount sand and silty mixtures. of fines) SC Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures. II. FINE GRAINED, more than Undisturbed chunk sample BG half of material is smaller SP — Standard penetration sample than No. 200 sieve size. SILTS AND CLAYS ML Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt or clayey- silt -sand mixtures with slight plas- ticity. Liquid Limit CL Inorganic clays of low to less than 50 medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays. OL Organic silts and organic silty clays or low plasticity. SILTS AND CLAYS MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts. Liquid Limit CH Inorganic clays of high greater than 50 plasticity, fat clays. OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat and other highly organic soils. V_ — Water level at time of excavation or as indicated US — Undisturbed, driven ring sample or tube sample CK — Undisturbed chunk sample BG — Bulk sample SP — Standard penetration sample SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL • TESTING, INC. BY: CHC p JOB HUMBER: 8921055 P� 5 -22 -89 ° TRENCH NUMBERI = _ �_ w o _ F < U ¢ W ] Q _ W W N H (n _ W = W J v_ ELEVATION ` < rn G Z < yr w u = N w ~ U < 6 d N d O < d N 2 ~ J 4 YI i 0 < 0 Q 2 i O u W 0 0 DESCRIPTION SM/ SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION, Humid Very SC Brown to Light Brown, Frac- Dense 1 tured Rock With Localized Weathering to SILTY CLAYEY SAND, METAVOLCANIC BEDROCK 2 BG 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 End of Trench at 11.01 No Refusal SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGEDBY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 SOIL TESTING,INC. JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 3 a °- TRENCH NUMBER2 W u W �? _ - r r < Z ¢ W ] Z Z - LLI W VI - = - j r W O i W n Z O TRENCH NUMBER 3 Z } Z=_ } W W= f V = Q W W y Z y Z 2 O r 0 H = W J O W ELEVATION Lo G t H W O Z Q u W N Z ~ t J 6 y O n O W O 4 y W O V in O U U DESCRIPTION D SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose SAND 1 CH SUBSOIL, Dark Reddish Brown, Humid Stiff BG SANDY CLAY 2 CL/ SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION, Humid Stiff CH Brown, Highly Weathered, 3 SANDY SILTY CLAY, METAVOL- CANIC BEDROCK BG 4 5 SC Brown to Light Brown, Frac- Humid Very tured, METAVOLCANIC BEDROCK Dense 6 .�y 7 End of Trench at 7.0' SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 SOIL S TESTING,INC. JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 5 a ° TRENCH NUMBER4 Z w T z v r ae z _ ) F � < T ¢ W O Z 2 W W V; _ N W _ ¢ F- W O > F - = J U Q W ELEVATION ¢ F- a(n ¢ F Z t y W 0 2 n w u y r 2 a o < H < 4 0 0 U ¢o S p U ¢ O G v DESCRIPTION SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Humid Loose SANDY, With Rock Fragments 1 CH SUBSOIL, Greyish Green, Medium Stiff 2 SANDY CLAY 3 CK 94.5 27.4 4 BG 5 SM LUSARDI FORMATION, Greenish Humid Dense 6 Tan, SILTY SAND CK 121.2 12.2 7 BG End of Trench at 7.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 SOIL S TESTING,INC. JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 6 a °— TRENCH NUMBERS Z W O > H = LL ELEVATION w U w t t < a O a o 0 Z J p W W O t N v U O 0 U v 0 OESCRIRTION SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose SAND 1 CL SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION, Humid Stiff Brown, SANDY SILTY CLAY, Highly Weathered 2 SM Brown to Light Brown, Frac- Humid Very tured Rock With Localized Dense 3 Weathering to SILTY SAND, METAVOLCANIC BEDROCK 4 \/ � J BG 5 /\ � �\ J 6 / 7 8 End of Trench at 8.0' TRENCH NUMBER 6 0 SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose SAND 1 - SM SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS, Humid Dense BIG Brown to Reddish Brown, Wea- 1 thered to SILTY SAND, META VOLCANIC BEDROCK Brown to Grey, Very ` ��UNWEATHERED, 3 Fractured, METAVOLCANIC BED- Dense ROCK Refusal at 3.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 49> SOIL & TESTING,INC. roe NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 7 Fractured Rock Near Refusal at 5.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL TESTING9INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR I DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 8 TRENCH NUMBER 7 = Z o = w w = J LL O ELEVATION y O a N Q n r a w O K w Q O U ¢ O O u ¢ O v D v ❑ESCRIPTION SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose to SAND Medium _ 1 Dense - BG - 2 L — - - SM/ SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION, Humid Very CL Brown to Light Brown, Weath- Dense _ 3 j ering to SILTY SAND to SANDY - CK CLAY, METAVOLCANIC BEDROCK Fractured Rock Near Refusal at 5.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL TESTING9INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR I DATE LOGGED: 4 -13 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 8 a 0 NUMBERS w U ' W z Z - - < U _ ¢ W ] 2 = H W W y _ 2 7 f W O - > ; = LL ELEVATION t m ¢ W _ W H_ U ul a v N a O < R L a o < y < < O O U ¢ O U O U U OESCRIRTION D SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose SAND - 1 CH SUBSOIL, Brown to Greyish Humid to Stiff Brown, SANDY CLAY Moist 2 3 SC LUSARDI FORMATION, Greenish Humid Dense 4 Tan With Rust Stains, CLAY - CK EY SAND 107.6 13.7 5 BG 6 End of Trench at 6.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -I3 -89 SOIL A TESTING,INC. JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 9 Z TRENCH NUMBER9 w w si Z F ~ < Z Q W Z Z ~ yI W N H S W > Z J O LL ELEVATION Z F V a 0 < 7 a ¢O p ¢ w o i rn < O= V O V Q v V DESCRIPTION D SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose SAND 1 CH SUBSOIL, Grey to Brown, Humid to Stiff BG SANDY CLAY Moist 2 3 Dense SM LUSARDI FORMATION, Greenish Humid 4 Tan to Brown, SILTY SAND 5 BG 6 K 110.6 18.4 7 8 9 10 End of Trench at 10.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4_14_89 SOIL & TESTING.INC. JOB HUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 10 a °- TRENCH NUMBER 10 W ' Z - r > r Z ¢ Z Z H _ w _ w O = J U O W ELEVATION ¢ < y ¢ H Z < W W w- u 'A Z W �- < ti y y y _ a O d y y ~ < K J p Ul i 4 < Q Q 0 U ¢ NE O U ¢ O y W DESCRIPTION 0 CH SUBSOIL, Dark Brown, SANDY Humid Firm CLAY SM LUSARDI FORMATION, Greenish Humid Dense Grey With Rust Stains Weath- ered to SILTY SAND 2 Occasional Caliche Stringers to 7' 3 4 5 6 BG 7 8 9 10 F CK 118.6 6.2 11 End of Trench at 11.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY-. JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 SOIL & TESTING,INC. JOB HUMS": 8921055 Plate No. 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Near Refusal at 9,0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL TESTING,INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14-89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 12 a z ° TRENCH NUMBER 11 W �_ z _ ` F < 2 W ] 2 W W y N W ¢ r W > J ELEVATION < y ¢ y w n N y a a O N n y F a < < O O U O O U O 0 H v DESCRIPTION SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose SAND IM SANTIA60 PEAK FORMATION, Tan Humid Dense to With Rust Stains, Weathering Very 2 to SILTY SAND, METAVOLCANIC Dense BEDROCK 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Near Refusal at 9,0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL TESTING,INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14-89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 12 3 CK 109.6 17.2 4 SC/ LUSARDI FORMATION, Grey to Humid Dense CL Rust, CLAYEY SAND to SANDY to Moist 5 CLAY 6 7 _ 9 10 End of Trench at 12.0' <4SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA � SOIL & TESTING,INC. 122.3 1 10.2 4 z W O K U J � W � ¢ O U SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGEDBY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 13 a Z °— TRENCH NUMBER 12 W t v f : 2! _ F H ` = W D Z y=j W y y W ¢ = J O�Z ELEVATION t y N W U Z a _ y y _ a 0 a < a O p ¢ p O y V DESCRIPTION V V 0 SM TOPSOIL, Dark Brown, SILTY Dry Loose SAND 1 — CL/ SUBSOIL, Dark Reddish Brown Humid Stiff CH to Greyish Brown, SANDY CLAY to Moist 2 L BG 3 CK 109.6 17.2 4 SC/ LUSARDI FORMATION, Grey to Humid Dense CL Rust, CLAYEY SAND to SANDY to Moist 5 CLAY 6 7 _ 9 10 End of Trench at 12.0' <4SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA � SOIL & TESTING,INC. 122.3 1 10.2 4 z W O K U J � W � ¢ O U SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGEDBY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 13 W 6 o TRENCH NUMBER13 W T T z T ti < = W 7 _ W W H H Q 7 0 J U ELEVATION 2 r < y ¢ ~ z N z _ W 7 W �- Z F K U a O a o i < < O p x U DESCRIPTION U O O CH SUBSOIL, Dark Brown to Brown Humid Firm SANDY CLAY to Moist 1 2 SC/ LUSARDI FORMATION, Grey With Humid Dense CL Rust Stains, SANDY CLAY to to Moist to Hard 3 CLAYEY SAND 4 5 6 End of Trench at 6.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGEDBY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -E9 SOIL do TESTING,INCi. JOB NUMBER: 8921055 1 Plate No. 14 a z ° TRENCH NUMBER I4 Z T _ �' ae zz _ Q = W N N W W r W 7 = J LL ELEVATION m S i H W W C Z �' W � c7 � 6 C N H O t j 4 (J, � = 6 4 T N O Z z J 4 W i Q t N ( < O O U D O U 6 O v v DESCRIPTION 0 CL/ SUBSOIL, Dark Brown to Brown Moist Stiff CH SANDY CLAY 1 2 3 CK 117.4 23.4 4 BG 5 6 SC/ SANTIAGO FORMATION, Grey to Humid Dense SM Brown, Weathering to SILTY 7 SAND to CLAYEY SAND, META - CK VOLCANIC BEDROCK 113.8 17.3 BG 8 Very i Fractured Rock Lip Dense 9 Near Refusal at 8.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: UBR DATE LOGGED:4 -14 -89 SOIL & TESTING,INC. JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 15 a Z °— TRENCH NUMBER 15 W T u'- �'- _ x = z - Y T ~ 4 Z ¢ W 2 Z W W y _ y Z W ¢ r 7 W O _ F = J O d ELEVATION ¢ � Z - ~ d y y d O d N a Q y ~ ZO J d 00 O y J U U ¢ U � DESCRIPTION 0 CH SUBSOIL, Dark Reddish Brown, Humid Firm SANDY CLAY to Moist 1 BG 2 SC LUSARDI FORMATION, Greenish Humid Dense Tan to Rust, CLAYEY SAND 3 4 5 6 CK 142.7 6.7 7 8 End of Trench at 8.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 SOIL & TESTING,INC. JOB NUMBER: 8921055 1 Plate No. 16 a °- TRENCH NUMBER 18 W I'- 9 z ti ~ < U z Q C 7 z z f W F N _ H z W _ 2 W 0 = J J O 1 ELEVATION H < N Q N W C F N ~ d N y 1 0 6 q G ~ J a 0 < y < < Q O U Q i O U Q O v v DESCRIPTION 0 CL/ SUBSOIL, Dark Grey to Brown, Humid Firm to CH SANDY CLAY to Moist Stiff 1 2 K 104.8 17.3 3 4 SM SANTIAGO PEAK FORMATION, Tan Humid Dense With Rust, Highly Weathered, to Very SILTY SAND, METAVOLCANIC Dense 5 BEDROCK 6 CK 142.2 6.6 7 BG 8 9 End of Trench at 9.0' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG LOGGED BY: JBR DATE LOGGED: 4 -14 -89 SOIL & TESTING,INC. JOB NUMBER: 8921055 Plate No. 17 G) D z m 0 N iq a r C m w m °- m m ZD z ZD �Z D v o SAND SILT OR CLAY w I Fine Coarse D Fine co N O (T1 .TJ cn D n co a� w v 9 z cn 0 1 cl N i US Sloadard Sieves Ny0rameler 36' le' 2" I" y2 %4" *io ►20 140 #60 (M /M/1ei81 0 24' I' *4 =B *N • 0 #100 #2 DO i 2 s w leo 14180 W ow.) 90 e0 so so 70 70 O 1: 2 IeD M�q` /�GiO at/ C ouL C 5O 50� VL F: FE 40Z l 4 Ora/17 S/ze (MM) PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS B DERICOBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY Coarse I Fine Coarse Msdium Fine (12 in.) 3in. 3 /4in. No.4 No.10 No, 40 No. 200 U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE T1 @ 2 -3 -- -- — T11 @ 6 -7 - — T12 @ 7 -8 e J a' Y O Cr 0 N 0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING,INC. J — u Y V ) G P v O M � TOPN V C • P L = C l c • e Y 0 o x o _ Y O V = Y = N O Y < � OHO � 7 O c o • e . � c � i . a o � e_ . ) V r C T O "Y Y L' w _ c _ V � � V w C V w V , Rancho De Mayo Subdivision, Tract 88 -351 Br: CHC DATE: 5 -24 -89 JOB HUMBER: 8921055 1 Plate No. 19 RANCHO DE MAYO SLJBDIVISICN, ENCMITA5 • CO 1 111 1.111 GRADDC SPECIFICATIONS GEM• AL • ••• •: N The intent of these specifications is to establish procedures for clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to be filled, and placing and compacting fill soils to the lines and grades shown on the accepted plans. The recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report and/or the attached Special Provisions are a part of the Recommended Grading Specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. These specifications shall only be used in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which they are a part. No deviation from these specifications will be allowed, except where specified in the geotechnical soil report or in other written communication signed by the Soil Engineer. • 1 Y?. 1 Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., shall be retained as the Soil Engineer to observe and test the earthwork in accordance with these specifications. It will be necessary that the Soil Engineer or his representative provide adequate observation so that he may provide an opinion that the work was or was not accomplished as specified. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the soil engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes and new information and data so that he may provide these opinions. In the event that any unusual conditions not covered by the special provisions or preliminary soil report are encountered during the grading operations, the Soil Engineer shall be contacted for further recommendations. If, in the opinion of the Soil Engineer, substandard conditions are encountered, such as; questionable or unsuitable soil, unacceptable moisture (R -8/87) SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1989 Appendix, Page 2 content, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc., construction should be stopped until the conditions are remedied or corrected or he shall recommend rejection of this work. Test methods used to determine the degree of compaction should be performed in accordance with the following American Society for Testing and Materials test methods: Maximum Density & Optimum Moisture Content - A.S.T.M. D- 1557 -78. Density of Soil In -Place - A.S.T.M. D- 1556 -64 or A.S.T.M. D -2922. All densities shall be expressed in terms of Relative Compaction as determined by the foregoing A.S.T.M. testing procedures. I'•.^1•' • • • 'DM • All vegetation, brush and debris derived from clearing operations shall be removed, and legally disposed of. All areas disturbed by site grading should be left in a neat and finished appearance, free from unsightly debris. After clearing or benching, the natural ground in areas to be filled shall be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, brought to the proper moisture content, corpacted and tested for the minimum degree of compaction in the Special Provisions or the recommendation contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report. All loose soils in excess of 6 inches thick should be removed to firm natural ground which is defined as natural soils which possesses an in -situ density of at least 90% of its maximum dry density. When the slope of the natural ground receiving fill exceeds 20% (5 horizontal units to 1 vertical unit), the original ground shall be stepped (R -8/87) SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1989 Appendix, Page 3 or benched. Benches shall be cut to a firm competent soil condition. The lower bench shall be at least 10 feet wide or 1 1/2 times the the equipment width which ever is greater and shall be sloped back into the hillside at a gradient of not less than two (2) percent. All other benches should be at least 6 feet wide. The horizontal portion of each bench shall be compacted prior to receiving fill as specified herein for compacted natural ground. Ground slopes flatter than 20% shall be benched when considered necessary by the Soil Engineer. Any abandoned buried structures encountered during grading operations must be totally removed. All underground utilities to be abandoned beneath any proposed structure should be removed from within 10 feet of the structure and properly capped off. The resulting depressions from the above described procedures should be backfilled with acceptable soil that is compacted to the requirements of the Soil Engineer. This includes, but is not limited to, septic tanks, fuel tanks, sewer lines or leach lines, storm drains and water lines. Any buried structures or utilities not to be abandoned should be brought to the attention of the Soil Engineer so that he may determine if any special recommendation will be necessary. All water wells which will be abandoned should be backfilled and capped in accordance to the requirements set forth by the Soil Engineer. The top of the cap should be at least 4 feet below finish grade or 3 feet below the bottom of footing whichever is greater. The type of cap will depend on the diameter of the well and should be determined by the Soil Engineer and/or a qualified Structural Engineer. Materials to be placed in the fill shall be approved by the Soil Engineer and shall be free of vegetable matter and other deleterious substances. SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1989 Appendix, Page 4 Granular soil shall contain sufficient fine material to fill the voids. The definition and disposition of oversized rocks, expansive and /or detrimental soils are covered in the geotechnical report or Special Provisions. Expansive soils, soils of poor gradation, or soils with low strength characteristics may be thoroughly mixed with other soils to provide satisfactory fill material, but only with the explicit consent of the soil engineer. Any import material shall be approved by the Soil Engineer before being brought to the site. PLACING AND COMPACTION OF FITS, Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in layers not to exceed 6 inches in compacted thickness. Each layer shall have a uniform moisture content in the range that will allow the compaction effort to be efficiently applied to achieve the specified degree of compaction. Each layer shall be uniformly compacted to a minimum specified degree of compaction with equipment of adequate size to economically compact the layer. Compaction equipment should either be specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability. The minimum degree of compaction to be achieved is specified in either the Special Provisions or the recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report. When the structural fill material includes rocks, no racks will be allowed to nest and all voids must be carefully filled with soil such that the minimum degree of compaction recommended in the Special Provisions is achieved. The maximum size and spacing of rock permitted in structural fills and in non - structural fills is discussed in the geotechnical report, when applicable. Field observation and compaction tests to estimate the degree of compaction of the fill will be taken by the Soil Engineer or his representative. The (R -8/87) SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1989 Appendix, Page 5 location and frequency of the tests shall be at the Soil Engineer's discretion. When the compaction test indicates that a particular layer is less than the required degree of compaction, the layer shall be reworked to the satisfaction of the Soil Engineer and until the desired relative compaction has been obtained. Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. Compaction by sheepsfoot rollers shall be at vertical intervals of not greater than four feet. In addition, fill slopes at ratios of two horizontal to one vertical or flatter, should be trackrolled. Steeper fill slopes shall be over -built and cut -back to finish contours after the slope has been constructed. Slope compaction operations shall result in all fill material six or more inches inward from the finished face of the slope having a relative compaction of at least 90% of maxin m dry density or that specified in the Special Provisions section of this specification. The compaction operation on the slopes shall be continued until the Soil Engineer is of the opinion that the slopes will be stable in regards to surficial stability. Slope tests will be made by the Soils Engineer during construction of the slopes to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Where failing tests occur or other field problens arise, the Contractor will be notified that day of such conditions by written communication from the Soil Engineer or his representative in the form of a daily field report. If the method of achieving the required slope compaction selected by the Contractor fails to produce the necessary results, the Contractor shall rework or rebuild such slopes until the required degree of compaction is obtained, at no cost to the Owner or Soils Engineer. (R -8/87) SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1989 Appendix, Page 6 M / '1 ))J P. The Engineering Geologist shall inspect cut slopes excavated in rock or lithified formational material during the grading operations at intervals determined at his discretion. If any conditions not anticipated in the preliminary report such as perched crater, seepage, lenticular or confined strata of a potentially adverse nature, unfavorably inclined bedding, joints or fault planes are encountered during grading, these conditions shall be analyzed by the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer to determine if mitigating measures are necessary. Unless otherwise specified in the geotechnical report, no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency. Field observation by the Soil Engineer or his representative shall be made during the filling and compacting operations so that he can express his opinion regarding the conformance of the grading with acceptable standards of practice. The presence of the Soil Engineer or his representative or the observation and testing shall not release the Grading Contractor from his duty to compact all fill material to the specified degree of compaction. Fill shall not be placed during unfavorable weather conditions. When work is interrupted by heavy rain, filling operations shall not be resumed until the proper moisture content and density of the fill materials can be achieved. Damaged site conditions resulting from weather or acts of God shall be repaired before acceptance of work. ER-A- /1 SCS &T 8921055 May 24, 1989 Appendix, Page 7 RECagEMED Q ADING SPECIFICATIONS - SPECIAL PROVISIONS MA= COMPAMON: The mininum degree of compaction to be obtained in compacting natural ground, in the compacted fill, and in the compacted backfill shall be at least 90 percent. For street and parking lot subgrade, the upper six inches should be compacted to at least 95% relative compaction. EXPANSIVE SOILS: Detrimentally expansive soil is defined as clayey soil which has an expansion index of 50 or greater when tested in accordance with the Uniform Building Code Standard 29-C. OVERSIZED M AERIAL: Oversized fill material is generally defined herein as rocks or lumps of soil over 6 inches in diameter. Oversize materials should not be placed in fill unless reconmendations of placement of such material is provided by the soils engineer. At least 40 percent of the fill soils shall pass through a No. 4 U.S. Standard Sieve. MMITION LOTS: Where transitions between cut and fill occur within the proposed building pad, the cut portion should be undercut a mininm of one foot below the base of the proposed footings and recompacted as structural backf ill. In certain cases that would be addressed in the geotechnical report, special footing reinforcement or a combination of special footing reinforcement and undercutting may be required. (R -8/87) SAN DIEGUI70 ENGINEERING, INC. F N G I NE FRS - P A N NE RS - SURVEYORS Iran K. Fos. P.E. Kam' L. Munson, P.F. Cordon L. SkEhun P.L.S. Laurie Simon. Principal Planner CIVIL ENGINEERING Enynering $IWira Site De. <Ivrnr tAneinis Gr ..' Plens Impmven., Pleru Dtu." Neu Sewe,mis er Line Plem IlydmlvyyMydnulics Cunswnivn Admininnli,m Ps"e" tReNMlitetiun F,xrns¢ FsgiiN<nng LAND PLANNING P,eA<quiu. Aivlyaie LaM P W Consulutim Ennrve.mel Anelysis Go•<mmcm R<luwna Land Min.. Tit.. c Mara Mexr U. Fie." S,enRe Plena Nanning AJminnueu.'<Panm, Rvunduy Adiuslrrenu LAND SURVEYING P.yrny Swveys TayrognpM<.I Sun -cr• Conumnim Seeking Records d Survey Ugel DricnE win SUM nu... May October 26, 1999 City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 S. Vulcan Encinitas, CA 92024 Subject: Hydrology/Hydraulic Study TPM 98 -139 Gentlemen; As part of the requirements for the referenced tentative map, we have prepared a Hydrologic/Hydraulic study for the subject site. Our study consisted of reviewing previous studies of the site, field observing existing offite and offsite conditions, and performing hydrologic and hydraulic calculations. As part of our study, we have reviewed the following: Hydraulic Analysis for TM 88 -183, City of Encinitas, prepared by San Dieguito Engineering, Inc., dated March 18, 1991 and April 23, 1991. Based upon our review this report appears to have been prepared according to current standards of practice, and appears to reflect the current existing conditions contributing flows to this project. F —.,.., Hydrologic calculations were performed for the offsite and offite basins affecting the IIngM femGUUOns CrMNr,, suaey, proposed improvements. Q's were determined by the County of San Diego Rational Method PMnagranmeuic Sun'eys and are presented on the attached Hydrology Calculations worksheet. The watershed affecting the site corresponds to the basin designated as A4 in the report referenced above. The time of concentration for this basin was calculated by assuming a 7.5 minute minimum time of concentration in addition to the travel time from the south westerly region of the site to the existing structures constructed as part of TM 88 -183. The Q used for the hydraulic analysis of on -site drainage structures was calculated using a 7.5 minute time of concentration. The watersheds are shown on the attached Offite and Offsite Hydrology Maps. (760) 753 -5575 a FAX (760) 943 -8236 4407 Manchester Avenue • Suite 105 a Encinitas. California 92024 Ito Hydraulic calculations for the existing storm drain system (SDS -1) were performed using StormCAD by Haestad Methods which incorporates system flow time with the hydrology time of concentration for analysis. The system was analyzed from the outlet (Node A) to the clean -out at station 5 +71.90 (Node G). A time of concentration of 10 minutes for areas A -5 through A -12 was used at Node G. This is more conservative than the 14 minutes used previously for the analysis of TM 88 -183. Although SDS -1 extends beyond Node `G', the system was not analyzed any further upstream since no backwater effect is created in the 24" pipe downstream of Node G. Based upon our analysis, the existing drainage system, SDS -1, will perform adequately under 100 year storm runoff, and no offsite drainage structures will be required to be constructed or replaced for the proposed development. In preparation for the possible development of TPM 98 -140, the extension of the 30" RCP of SDS -I (nodes H) was analyzed and concluded to be feasible for 100 year runoff. The drainage system has been designed to ensure that the runoff from the 100 year event under developed conditions does not exceed the pre- development 100 year runoff of 35 cfs. The attached calculations indicate that the depression at the existing headwall will function as a detention basin and attenuate the developed 100 year runoff. The depth of ponding which will occur in the retention pond at the existing headwall over the duration of the 100 year event is not great enough to produce a flow into the system in excess of the existing 100 year flow. Therefore the downstream 100 year runoff will not increase above the existing 35.0 cfs. Hydraulic calculations for all proposed on -site improvements are attached and the results are incorporated onto the improvement plans. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Thank you, 1,1 Barry L. Munson, PE Senior Civil Engineer L. OJECT NAME: OAKLEY PROJECT NUMBER: SDE 4460 COMMENT: COORD: N33 -03 -00 E117 -12 -45 100 YEAR STORM P6 (in): 3.00 P6/P24: 0.60 P24 (in): 5.00 ADJUSTED 3.00 <HYDRO SOIL GROUP> RUNOFFCOEFF - C D 0.45 Residential : Rural 0.95 Paved Road WATERSHED DESIGNATION EVENT ear AREA s AREA Ac C Tc min) I i h Q Subarea cfs B 100 11478 0.26 0.45 7.5 6.09 072 A 100 31696 0.73 0.45 7.5 6.09 1.99 B 100 11478 0.26 0.45 7.5 6.09 072 C 100 138704 3.18 0.45 7.5 6.09 8.72 D 100 175843 4.04 0.45 7.5 6.09 11.05 <'> 100 488204 11.21 0.47 9.5 5.22 27.52 PARCEL 2 100 65750 1.51 0.45 7.5 6.09 4.13 G - PARCEL 3 100 67880 1.56 0.45 7.5 6.09 4.27 H 100 14960 0.34 0.95 7.5 6.09 1.99 1 100 5409 0.12 0.95 7.5 6.09 0.72 J 100 7971 0.18 0.95 7.5 6.09 1.06 K 100 6957 0.16 0.95 7.5 6.09 0.92 L - REM PARCEL 100 59989 1.38 0.45 10.0 5.05 3.14 <1> FUTURE PAD 1 (FP1) 100 80607 1.85 0.45 7.5 6.09 5.07 <1> FUTURE STIR 1 (FS1) 100 4198 0.10 0.95 7.5 6.09 0.56 <1> FUTURE PAD 2 (FP2) 100 135226 3.10 0.51 7.5 6.09 9.63 <1> PARCEL 3 DITCH 100 5110 0.12 0.45 7.5 6.09 0.32 <3> PARCEL 4 DITCH 100 16169 0.37 0.45 7.5 6.09 1.01 <2> FLOW TO EX 30" 100 807313 18.53 0.48 9.5 5.22 46.48 <AREAS B,C.E -K> UNDEVELOPED OFFSITE OFFSITE AREA 1 (OS1) 100 37355 0.86 0.45 7.5 6.09 2.35 OFFSITE AREA 2 (OS2) 100 191626 4.40 0.45 11.9 4.53 8.97 "NOTE: DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN THIS AREA CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF TM 88 -183. <1> POSSIBLE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN PORTION OF AREA "E" <2> PORTION OF AREA "E" TO DP#4 <3> PORTION OF AREA "G DRAINING INTO BROW DITCH OF PARCEL 3 TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATION INITIAL Tc ASSUMED: Tc =7.5 MIN REACH 1: BROW DITCH FOR AREA "B, C" Q =9.44 SLOPE =8.4% LENGTH= 470 V= 14.8 Tt =0.52 MIN. Tc=tc +Tt Tc= 8.02 MIN. REACH 2: DP#1 TO DP#2, ADDITIONAL FLOW FROM AREA: FP2 (Q FOR FP2 >OS2) Q =19.07 SLOPE =3.6% LENGTH= 246 V= 12.8 Tt =0.32 MIN. Tc =tc +Tt Tc= 8.34 MIN. REACH 3: DP#2 TO DP#3, ADDITIONAL FLOW FROM AREAS: F, H Q =25.19 SLOPE =1.0% LENGTH =23 V= 8.02 Tt =0.05 MIN. Tc =tc +Tt Tc= 8.39 MIN. REACH 4: DP#3 TO DP#4, ADDITIONAL FLOW FROM AREAS: I, FP1, FS1 Q =31.54 SLOPE =4.22% LENGTH= 236 V= 15.9 Tt =0.25 MIN. Tc =tc +Tt Tc= 8.64 MIN. REACH 5: DP#4 TO DP#5, ADDITIONAL FLOW FROM AREA: "PARCEL 4 DITCH" Q =32.55 SLOPE =1.0% LENGTH= 170 V= 9.27 Tt =0.30 MIN. Tc =tc +Tt Tc= 8.94 MIN. REACH 5: DP#5 TO EXIST. 30" RCP ADDITIONAL FLOW FROM AREA: L 0=35.69 SLOPE =1.4% LENGTH= 142 V= 3.66 Tt =0.65 MIN. Tc =tc +Tt Tc= 9.59 MIN. TTY OF SAN DIEGO g OD CONTROL OF SANITATION & 100 -YEAR 6 -1190' PRECIPITATION FLOOD CONTROL 1�i1 r '20-1 ISOPLUYIALS OF 100 —YEAH 641OUR I'CECIFI T A ION 11.1 BUNS OF AN Il�.CII Loc ' 4 Bf.ACII � y5� S 35 ') � � , j .. 3oE i 30 n 1. 45; E035 rncccA '1 C < .� .. SAN CL Y,ENTE \ 1 \ (•`/ . � �, \\ \ - 30 ' �-� r 4s•�SO - 1 ,/ ��1� ^� 27.5•��(` �,f —% � 151 X35 3( U 7 ' nCEl,N1, — 225 �i 0 ` 33' , 30 u `AONA Q` d r _ _ 1 TEL MAR 5 \�?2 i — r N4 451 - L^ 1 I l CARMN IY I I C P•t P" -d by 20 / V, 5 U.S. D d ['OF COMMERCE I NATIONAL OCEANIC NIC AND AND AT. T, OSPIIENIC ADMINISTRATION -� � �' \ � � � / \\ SPECIAL STUDIES BRANCH, OFFICE OF II UROLOGY, NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE $A IIQ 1 tL 7� �a � dL 11 301 20 35 0 1181 451 30' 15' 117- - -11{51 30' 151 116° Revised 1/85 APPFNDIX X1 -C rY DIEGO DEr,\RTMEONTSOF SANITATION 6 100-VEAit 24-1,10111 MciprrATIOH FLOOD CONTROL '- 20- ISOPLUVIALS Or 100 -YEAR 244IOUR 45 PRECIPITATION 11.1 TENTHS OF All INCH . ._. � 100 tl'•p . rra�PJ - \ 2j � — HD 5 J coRCN 4 '35 61S .� 3 \ < _ S Lilo � � � � (��p � 1 � I 4 "� LA 301 SAGr V (80 —c rdo )� ; .. Mc- 01 - - SAN CL MENIE I - / • - ~' l� 60 20 - 15' _,_�� —x•160 40" ANSID r p 70 S1TE 46 1- 0 111[ 1 gg 1 3 33 � �� 1 ON, au IrL MAI ' JJ ` / f " % _ ((130 45' c 80 PrePO. b, U.S. DEPARTMEN P OF COMMERCE 7U ; �)tj 3 NATIONAL OC EA ]IC AND Al " O5PIIE RIC AUa11N ISTRATION ) ) .� � 1 t , "Cut. IA �� O +� �( SPECIAL STUDIES URANCII, OFFICE OF II UROLOGY, NA- r10NAL WEATIIER SERVICE SA "' „J; /9 �J / ” r "� [3 4} 301 _ �•S gscU 0 (eo7o /510'70 —"ss6o I'" --5�� f �f 1 I- 1 1 II" 1r J 1 301 1 1' I 17' II 1 I r , 3 D I I I f, Revised I /8S APPENDIX XI -II STORM DRAIN SYSTEM SCHEMATIC NO iSCALE PfRNf8 -183 FUTU - - �• �'� � �� BY t 1 / f A �2 II I % $ Aa h AREA "A ", BROW DITCH AT MIN SLOPE Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File c:\Idata \working.fm2 Worksheet BROW DITCH, AREA A Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.010000 ft/ft Diameter 24.00 in Discharge 1.99 cfs Results Depth 0.40 ft I O Flow Area 0.45 ft' Wetted Perimeter 1.86 ft Top Width 1.60 ft Critical Depth 0.49 ft Percent Full 20.04 Critical Slope 0.004489 fUft Velocity 4.43 ft/s Velocity Head 0.31 ft Specific Energy 0.71 ft Froude Number 1.48 Maximum Discharge 24.33 cfs Full Flow Capacity 22.62 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.000077 ft/ft Flow is supercritical. rypV V„ t5Z0W QITGH OK 03/30/99 FlowMaster v511 01 14.53 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page i of 1 AREA B, BROW DITCH AT MIN. SLOPE Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File c: lldatalworking.fm2 Worksheet BROW DITCH, AREA B Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.010000 ft/ft Diameter 24.00 in Discharge 0.72 cfs Results Depth 0.24 ft L S. O ' O � Flow Area 0.22 ft' —� Wetted Perimeter 1.43 ft Top Width 1.31 ft Critical Depth 0.29 ft Percent Full 12.23 Critical Slope 0.004834 ft/ft Velocity 3.28 ft/s Velocity Head 0.17 ft Specific Energy 0.41 ft Froude Number 1.41 Maximum Discharge 24.33 cfs Full Flow Capacity 22.62 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.000010 ft/ft Flow is supercritical. 0326/99 FlowMaster v5.11 11 15 :41 AM Haestad Methods. Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06706 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 AREAS B, C BROW DITCH AT MIN SLOPE Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File u: \ldata \engineering \4460 \4460_hyd.fm2 Worksheet BROW DITCH, AREAS B,C Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.066700 ft/ft Er (I-7rN. rCNS1T`c1L0 �(,OPC Diameter 24.00 in Discharge 9.44 cfs Results Depth 0.54 It L GLi Flow Area 0.69 ft' Wetted Perimeter 2.19 ft Top Width 1.78 It Critical Depth 1.10 ft Percent Full 27.18 Critical Slope 0.005106 fUft Velocity 13.66 ft/s Velocity Head 2.90 it Specific Energy 3.45 ft Froude Number 3.87 Ma)amum Discharge 62.85 cfs Full Flow Capacity 58.42 Cis Full Flow Slope 0.001741 ft/ft Flow is supercritical. 09/15M FtowMaster v511 00:30:28 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Wsterbury, CT 06709 (203) 756.1666 Page 1 of 1 AREAS B, C BROW DITCH AT AVERAGE SLOPE Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File u: \t data \engineering \4460k4460_hyd.fm2 Worksheet BROW DITCH, AREAS B,C Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.084000 ft/ft Diameter 24.00 in Discharge 9.44 cfs Results Depth 0.51 ft Flow Area 0.64 ft' Wetted Perimeter 2.12 ft Top Width 1.75 ft Critical Depth 1.10 ft Percent Full 25.64 Critical Slope 0.005106 ft/ft Velocity 14.83 tits ---7 USED Velocity Head 3.42 ft Specific Energy 3.93 ft Froude Number 4.33 Maximum Discharge 70.53 cfs Full Flow Capacity 65.56 CIS Full Flow Slope 0.001741 ft/ft Flow ts Supercritical. T2 CA(,& Fol2 1zCW i J- 09115&9 Fk.Wa ter X5.11 09:2918 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookalde Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 Or 1 BROW DITCH AT MIN. SLOPE, PARCEL 3 Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description 0.17 Project File u: \ldata \4460 \4460_hyd.fm2 Worksheet BROW DITCH, PARCEL 3 Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.010000 ft/ft Diameter 24.00 in Discharge 0.32 cfs Results Depth 0.17 ft C p ' OIL Flow Area 0.12 ft' Wetted Perimeter 1.17 ft Top Width 1.10 ft Critical Depth 0.19 ft Percent Full 8.31 Critical Slope 0.005297 ft/ft Velocity 2.57 ft/s Velocity Head 0.10 ft Specific Energy 0.27 ft Froude Number 1.35 Maximum Discharge 24.33 cfs Full Flow Capacity 2262 cfs Full Flow Slope 0 000002 ft/ft Flow is supercritical 04/27/99 FlowMaster v5 11 03 :44 52 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 D -22 FROM PARCEL 3 BROW DITCH Worksheet for Rectangular Channel Project Description 0.08 Project File u:\ldata \4460 \4460_hyd.fm2 Worksheet D -22 Flow Element Rectangular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data 0.08 Mannings Coefficient 0.018 Channel Slope 0.010000 ft/ft Bottom Width 3.00 ft Discharge 0.32 cfs Results Depth 0.08 ft -1-,2 S I oK Flow Area 0.23 ft' Wetted Perimeter 3.15 ft Top Width 3.00 ft Critical Depth 0.07 ft Critical Slope 0.012140 ft/ft Velocity 1.42 fus Velocity Head 0.03 ft Specific Energy 0.11 ft Froude Number 0.00 04/27/99 FlowMaster v5.11 03.44.38 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 BROW DITCH - OS2 Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description 0.88 Project File uA1data \4460 \4460_hyd.fm2 Worksheet OS2 BROW DITCH Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data 0.88 Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.010000 tuft Diameter 24.00 in Discharge 8.97 cfs Results Depth 0.88 ft G �, 0 ' Q` Flow Area 1.32 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 2.89 ft Top Width 1.98 ft Critical Depth 1.07 ft Percent Full 43.77 Critical Slope 0.005031 ttlft Velocity 6.78 ft/s Velocity Head 0.72 ft Specific Energy 1.59 ft Froude Number 1.47 Maximum Discharge 24.33 cis Full Flow Capacity 22.62 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.001572 ftlft Flow is supercritical. 05f2OM Flay O ter v5.11 02:21 32 PM Haestad Methods. Inc. 37 Brooks"o Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 7`311666 pawl of 1 DP#1 TO DP#2, (AREA B +C +FP2) 18 "RCP Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description 1.18 Project File u: \t data \engineering \4460k4460_hyd.fm2 Worksheet DP#1 TO DP#2 Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.036000 ft/ft Diameter 18.00 in Discharge 19.07 cfs Results Depth 1.18 ft Flow Area 1.49 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 3.26 ft Top Width 1.24 ft Critical Depth 1.46 ft Percent Full 78.34 Critical Slope 0.029189 ft/ft Velocity 12.84 ft/s Velocity Head 2.56 ft Specific Energy 3.74 ft Froude Number 2.06 Maximum Discharge 21.44 cfs Full Flow Capacity 19.93 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.032962 ft/ft Flow Is supercritical. USE 61Z Tc. CP4LL t L M7W 09/15FQ 0940:56 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury , CT 06708 (203) 755 -16% F IovMlaster v-511 Page 1 of 1 DP#1 TO DP#2, CRITICAL DEPTH 18 "RCP Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description 0.029161 ft/ft Project File u: \1 datMengineering 1446014460_hyd.fm2 Worksheet 0P#1 TO DPt2, CRITICAL DEPTH Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Slope Input Data 0.029161 ft/ft Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Depth 1.460 It Diameter 18.00 in Discharge 19.07 cfs Results Channel Slope 0.029161 ft/ft Flow Area 1.75 ft' Wetted Perimeter 4.22 ft Top Width 0.48 ft Critical Depth 1.46 ft Percent Full 97.33 Critical Slope 0.029189 ft/ft Velocity 10.87 fus Velocity Head 1.84 ft Specific Energy 3.30 It Froude Number 1.01 Mabmum Discharge 19.29 cfs Full Flow Capacity 17.94 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.032962 ft/ft Flow is supercritical. L i)l'�61l hiu 15(, W5,n +4q2 /= 23o, 13 M,,,/ pt�irl (v) ,ZE -O'D 4�4 F- Koh � z V 232.v - 225,92 = ([.off' 0 am em HowMaster v5.11 OB:3B:54AM Heested Methods. lw. V Broolaslde Road Waterbury, CT007I7B QVM 7&1996 Page 1 of 1 TYPE F INLET AND GRATE INLET CALCULATIONS (PT it I PROJECT NAME: OAKLEY fi _ �-�C I q o-7 G �S PROJECT NUMBER: SDE 4460 I REFERENCE: TPM98 -139 C01.1STIZ.UL? $OX �� ppU6L -� OPri)`1iuC -1� SINGLE DOUBLE TOP OF gpX 17 OIELO 1 v ENTRANCE LC C (sq edged) 0.62 GRATE LENGTH (ft) , 2.95 INLET LENGTF L 100 GRATE WIDTH (R): 1.54 INLET DEPTH I D 0.62 PERIMETER (ft): 8.98 INLET AREA (RA 1.93 P / 2 (ft): 4.49 DEPTH INCREMENT 0.05 TOTAL AREA A(sf): 4.54 0 2 x Q EFFECTIVE AREA (so: 1.14 F BOX WINDOW <1> GRATE <2> TOTAL HEAD FROM SINGLE DOUBLE TOP OF HEAD FROM SINGLE DOUBLE OPENING OPENING OPENING CENTROID OPENING OPENING HEAD WEIR ORIFICE VALUE TOTAL TOTAL h 0 2 x Q GRATE <3> 0 Q Q O Q ft R cfs cis R cfs ds cis cfs c(s 0.40 0.71 8.06 16.13 0.03 0.05 0.05 8.12 16.18 0.45 0.76 8.34 16.69 0.06 0.28 0.28 8.62 16.96 0.50 0.81 8.62 17.23 0.13 0.60 0.60 9.21 17.83 0.55 0.86 8.88 17.76 0.18 0.99 0.99 9.87 18.74 0.60 0.91 9.14 18.27 0.23 1.44 1.44 10.57 19.71 0.65 0.96 9.38 18.77 0.28 1.94 1.94 11.33 20.71 0.70 1.01 9.63 19.25 0.33 2.50 2.50 12.12 2175 1.06 9.86 19.73 0.75 0.37 3.09 3.09 12.96 22.82 0.80 1.11 10.09 20.19 0.42 3.73 6.76 3.73 13.83 23.92 0.85 1.16 10.32 20.64 0.47 4.41 7.99 4.41 14.73 25.05 0.90 1.21 10.54 21.08 0.53 5.12 9.28 5.12 15.67 26.21 0.95 1.26 10.76 21.52 0.58 5.87 10.64 5.87 16.63 27.39 1.00 1.31 10.97 21.94 0.63 6.66 12.05 6.66 17.63 28.60 1.05 1.36 11.18 22.36 0.68 7.47 13.53 7.47 18.65 29.83 1.10 1.41 11.38 22.76 0.73 8.32 15.06 8.32 19.70 31.08 1.15 1.46 11.58 23.17 0.78 9.19 16.64 9.19 20.77 32.36 1.20 1.51 11.78 23.56 0.83 10.09 18.28 10.09 21.87 3165 1.25 1.56 11.97 23.95 0.88 11.03 19.97 11.03 23.00 34.97 1.30 1.61 1217 24.33 0.93 11.98 21.70 11.98 24.15 36.31 1.35 1.66 12.35 24.71 0.98 12.97 23.49 12.97 25.32 37.68 1.40 1.71 12.54 25.08 1.03 13.98 25.32 13.98 26.52 39.06 1.45 1.76 12.72 25.44 1.08 15.01 27.19 15.01 27.73 40.46 1.50 1.81 12.90 25.80 1.13 16.07 29.11 16.07 28.97 41.88 1.55 1.86 13.08 26.16 1.18 17.16 31.07 1716 30.24 43.31 1.60 1.91 13.25 26.51 1.23 18.26 33.08 18.26 31.52 44.77 1.65 1.96 13.43 26.85 1.28 19.39 35.12 19.39 32.82 46.25 1.70 2.01 13.60 27.19 1.33 20.54 37.21 20.54 34.14 47.74 1.75 2.06 13.77 27.53 1.38 21.72 39.33 21.72 35.48 49.25 1.80 2.11 13.93 27.86 1.43 41.50 41.50 55.43 69.36 1.85 2.16 14.10 28.19 1.48 43.70 43.70 57,80 71.90 1.90 2.21 14.26 28.52 1.53 45.94 45.94 60.20 74.46 1.95 2.26 14.42 28.84 1.58 48.22 48.22 62.64 77.06 2.00 2.31 14.58 29.16 1.63 50.54 50.54 65.11 79.69 2.05 2.35 14.74 29.47 1.68 52.89 52.89 67.62 82.36 2.10 2.40 14.89 29.78 1.73 55.27 55.27 70.16 85.06 2.15 2.45 15.05 30.09 1.78 57.69 57.69 72.74 87.78 2.20 2.50 15.20 30.40 1.63 60.15 60.15 75.34 90.54 2.25 2.55 15.35 30.70 1.88 62.64 62.64 7798 93.33 2.30 2.60 15.50 31.00 1.93 65.16 65.16 80.66 96.15 2.35 2.65 15.65 31.29 1.98 67.71 67.71 83.36 99.01 2.40 2.70 15.79 31.59 2.03 70.30 70.30 86.09 101.89 2.45 2.75 15.94 31.66 2.08 72.92 72.92 88.86 104.80 2.50 2.80 16.08 12.17 2.13 75.57 75.57 91.65 107.74 NOTES <1> SINCE WINDOW IS NOT RECTANGULAR, THE FOLLOWING SIMPLIFICATIION IS USED: CENTROID 0 0.33' FROM TOP OF OPENING = 0.70 FROM TOP OF BOX <2> PER BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS WEIR FLOW FOR H < = 0.4' ORIFICE FLOW FOR H >= 1.4' THE LESSER VALUE IS USED <3> HEIGHT FROM TOP OF OPENING TO TOP OF BOX =0.38' )f CHART 1 -103.6 A CAPACITY OF CURB OPENING INLETS ASSUMED 27 CROWN, Q = 0,7L (A +Y)3/2 *A = 0,33 Y = HEIGHT OF WATER AT CURB FACE (0.4' MAXIMUM) REFER TO CHART 1- 104.12 L = LENGTH OF CLEAR OPENING OF INLET *Use A =0 when the inlet is adjacent to traffic; i.e., for a Type V' median inlet or where the parking lane is removed. L REV. I I CITY OF SAN DIEGO DESIGN GUIDE SHT. N0. CAPACITY OF CURB OPENING INLETS 13 ST. FLOW DEPTH @ DP#2 (AREAS F +H) Worksheet for Irregular Channel Project Description Project File u: \1 data \engineering \4460\4460_hyd.fm2 Worksheet DP2, CURB INLET Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Water Elevation Input Data 0.015 Channel Slope 0.039000 ft/ft ft = I Elevation range: 0.00 ft to 0.50 ft. 1.32 Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Start Station End Station 0.00 0.50 0.00 13.50 1.50 0.00 0.30 3.50 0.13 0.39 13.50 0.33 0.005792 ft/ft Discharge 6.12 cfs = Gc CYO Results 0.33 ft Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.015 Water Surface Elevation 0.30 ft = I Flow Area 1.32 ft' Wetted Perimeter 11.41 ft Top Width 11.36 ft Height 0.30 ft Critical Depth 0.39 ft Critical Slope 0.005792 ft/ft Velocity 4.64 ft/s Velocity Head 0.33 ft Specific Energy 0.63 ft Froude Number 2.40 Flow is supercritical. Roughness 0.015 C61eR /ti:�T e1V1'2 4 Y rC' r/ c6 SaN Pik— v �ESi6N Gv�o�� Ckwr / -/6 62= O.7 L. (A4-Y) 51Z A 76"r of cwq -fue di- Gcge FA4�5h a 3d� f%= 013 3 SOLriE M%2 66V67,V ,eCO&IR,5-D: G = X 0,7 �A is L = l7. S (;se 00' LCW6- o/lWurAr, 09115M Fk hAaster vF 11 11:40:46 AM Haestad Methods. Inc. 37 Brookskle Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203)755-IBM Page 1 or 1 Cross Section DP#2 Cross Section for Irregular Channel Project Description Project File u: lldata lengineeting1446014460_hyd.fm2 Worksheet DP2, CURB INLET Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Water Elevation Section Data Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.015 Channel Slope 0.039000 ft/ft Water Surface Elevation 0.30 ft Discharge 6.12 cfs F C o C m N w •• r•.• 0. 1.45 0.4 1.35 0.3 1.25 0.2 x.15 0.1 .05 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 Station (ft) FlowMaster v5.11 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury. CT 06706 (233) 755.1666 Page 1 of 1 EVE MMM MSS _M nnr SPE ID5TERm%wc HW St,f-VATIOU AT D.P. *42 Foil PIPE Flow - DP oz To p. P. W5 C�lvE►s � H -W 3 = 4= 25.19 GF5 PIPE VIA = Z L = ZZ.(' ) Y)Mo.013 V = 01A V= 25.19/,. = S.oz fT /s,cL Zzo. Z 8' 4 A` F= IT 0 = s M JZ r/ r = 0.5 hL= c +I + 29r1ZL- R °T ) 2-9----1111 Cc +t + Z9 (C.5 +1 + 0.z8� �I•o� III = 1.q e , HUF-1- e oF-W I> -� �L_ ZZo,Z8' + VI 8' 2Z2,0�� ST. FLOW DEPTH @ DP #3 AREAS( I +FPI +FS1) Worksheet for Irregular Channel Project Description 0.015 Project File c: \ldata \working.fm2 Worksheet DP3, CURB INLET Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Water Elevation Input Data 0.015 Channel Slope 0.039000 fUft ft =1' Elevation range: 0.00 ft to 0.50 ft. ft' Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Start Station End Station Roughness 0.00 0.50 0.00 13.50 0.015 1.50 0.00 ft 3.50 0.13 ft 13.50 0.33 Velocity Discharge 6 35 cfs = Qtoo Results ft Specific Energy Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.015 Water Surface Elevation 0.30 ft =1' Flow Area 1.36 ft' Wetted Perimeter 11.59 ft Top Width 11.53 ft Height 0.30 ft Critical Depth 0.40 ft Critical Slope 0.005750 ft/ft Velocity 4.68 fUS Velocity Head 0.34 ft Specific Energy 0.64 ft Froude Number 2.41 Flow is supercritical. `u CE oPEuluc� LEUGTN VeGt'V L= a A =o.33 L =18.4 1.1S>r 19 /La14U aPEutwGi 03/29/99 FlowMaster v5.11 0451 50 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 Cross Section DP #3 Cross Section for Irregular Channel Project Description 0. Project File c: \1data \working fm2 Worksheet DP3, CURB INLET Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Water Elevation Section Data Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.015 Channel Slope 0.039000 ft/ft Water Surface Elevation 0.30 ft Go -33 WC FLvld OVCV- G(boUP, pK Discharge 6.35 cfs Station (ft) 03/29/99 FlowMasler v5 11 045249 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 0. ---------------------- ------------ - ---------------------------------- ------------ r r 0.45 --- -- 0.4 - --- ---- --- --- ---- ---------- ------- -------------- --------- ---------- 0.35 - --------'----- ----- -•--- ---- ----•------- - - --- - ; 0.3 - --------------------------------- ---- -- - ------ -------- C 0 0.25 - - - - -- -------- -- - -- ----- ---- %- --------- - ---- - -------------+--------- W 0.2 ------------------ ; -- ------------------ -------- ------- --------- --- - ----- 0.15 ----- -- -- ' ----------- J -------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --- % 0.05 --- - - -- -- --- ----------------------- ----------- r 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 Station (ft) 03/29/99 FlowMasler v5 11 045249 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 24" RCP (DP #3 TO DP#4) Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description 1.21 Project File u: \ldata \4460 \4460_hyd.fm2 Worksheet DP #3 TO DP#4 Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.042200 ft/ft Diameter 24.00 in Discharge 31.54 cfs Results Depth 1.21 ft c Z, p " O k Flow Area 1 98 ft' -- Wetted Perimeter 3.56 ft Top Width 1.96 ft Critical Depth 1.88 ft Percent Full 60.40 Critical Slope 0.016804 ft/ft Velocity 15.90 ft/s Velocity Head 193 it Specific Energy 5.14 ft Froude Number 2.78 Maximum Discharge 49.99 Cfs Full Flow Capacity 46.47 cfs Full Flow Slope 0 019440 ft/ft Flow is supercritical. 04/27/99 FlowMaster v5.11 01 4624 PM Haestad Methods. Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 24" RCP (DP #3 TO DP#4), CRITICAL DEPTH Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description l.dd Project File c:lldatalworking.fm2 Worksheet DP #3 TO DP#4, CRITICAL DEPTH Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.016800 ft/ft Diameter 24.00 in Discharge 31.54 cfs Results uepin l.dd It = UG Flow Area 3.06 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 5.28 ft Top Width 0.97 ft Critical Depth 1.88 ft Percent Full 93.79 Critical Slope 0.016804 ft/ft Velocity 10.31 ft/s = vG Velocity Head 1.65 ft Specific Energy 3.53 ft Froude Number 1.02 Maximum Discharge 31.54 cfs Full Flow Capacity 29.32 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.019440 ft/ft Flow is supercritical 14w = DGi (� +-y-�� z �, gY + iI +t7.5J iob.3 104.4 DP 3 H 1 5.9z 4 516 = LLZ "ILI OE9rH CZ iCI rvFr_ F CLAZI7, T C" -;,-o.5 t7— VMij ^ 5 03/30199 FlowMaster v511 08'24.11 AM Haestao Methods, Inc 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755.1888 Page 1 of 1 30" RCP (DP#4 TO DP#5) Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File uA1data\engineering \4460 \4460_hyd.fm2 Worksheet DP#4 TO DP*5 Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.010000 ft/ft Diameter 30.00 in Discharge 32.55 cfs Results Depth 1.68 ft Z,S GK Flow Area 3.51 ft' Wetted Perimeter 4.81 ft Top Width 2.35 ft Critical Depth 1.94 ft Percent Full 67.26 Critical Slope 0.006999 ft/ft Velocity 9.27 ft/s Velocity Head 1.34 ft Specific Energy 3.02 ft Froude Number 1.34 Maximum Discharge 44.12 cfs Full Flow Capacity 41.01 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.006298 tuft Flow is supercritical. COIV✓ rRvcr 7`iP� 2 /�I�QAP �NtnGy Dist /�A�i2 I�Fx /e SD 4U, 8 Gv7DE X /Q L.oN(r CF MGiiVG %z1�G %ZOL.e T �, �% l OUP I %7f7C /C �IL?Ct' d�GFINILE% OF ig, G. IW7199 FlowMaster v5.11 0:2-910 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (2(33)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 30" RCP (DP#4 TO DP#5), CRITICAL DEPTH Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description 1.94 Project File u: \1 data \engineering \4460 \4460_hyd.fm2 Worksheet DP#4 TO DP#5, CRITICAL DEPTH Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.007000 ft/ft Diameter 30.00 in Discharge 32.55 cfs Results Depth 1.94 ft Flow Area 4.09 ft' Wetted Perimeter 5.39 ft Top Width 2.08 ft Critical Depth 1.94 ft Percent Full 77.69 Critical Slope 0.006999 ft/ft Velocity 7.95 ft/s Velocity Head 0.98 ft Specific Energy 2.93 ft Froude Number 1.00 Maximum Discharge 36.91 cfs Full Flow Capacity 34.32 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.006298 ft/ft Flow is supercritical. Nw= vC4 (i��)Vi9 79S /�iz.z) = 3.41 DP *1 4 Nw E& = Zos,73.1- 3 ¢1 = Z69.14¢ tplmv ba4g (v) ,ea'o r-vR F -130 3.4.1+ (9,2 �'��-a,,r= S,a4 -r l)6srGti V = Z j I o - ZOS,73 = .27 G,C lormsa FlowMaster v5 .11 IH.U21)AM Heeslad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 067nB (203) 7$1666 Page 1 of 1 7 I00 -1.6.1 Selection of Riprap and Filter Blanket Material- I I I ]opt. llopt.2 I I I IPeI. IR.Ck I Riprap I Sec. I Sec. I ILowecl IFt /SeclClaaslThlck- 1 200 1 400 1 opt. 3 ILayerl (1) 1 (2) Ines@ 'T'I (4) 1 14) 1 (5) I (6) I I_I_1 I 1 1 I_I I IN.. ]I I I I I I I [Back -I I I I I I 1 6 -7 ling 1 .6 1 3/16'1 C2 I D.G. I -- I I_I_I 1 1 I 1_I I INa. 21 I 1 I I I 1 IBatk-I I I 1 I I 1 7 -6 ling 1 1.0 1 1/4' I 83 1 D.G. I— I I_I_I I I 1 I_I I IF•0- I I I I I I 1 6- 9.511ng 1 1.4 1 3/6. 1 — 1 D.G. I— I I_I_I I I I I_I I 1 I I I 3/4' 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1-1/2' 1 I 19.5- 111Lightl 2.0 1 1/2. 1 -- I P.R. I— I I I I I I I 7/4^ I I 1 1 1/4 1 1 1 1 1-1/2' I I 1 11 -131 TON 1 2.7 1 3/4. 1 — 1 P.B. I Sandi I_I_I 1 I I I I I 3/4" 1 I 1 1 1/2 1 1 1 1 1 -1/2' 1 I 1 13 -151 TON 1 3.4 1 1' 1 -- 1 P.B. I Sandi I_I 1 15- 1711 -TONI 4.3 I1 -1 /2 "I — I Type B I Sandl 117- 2012 -TONI 5.4 1 I' 1 — 1 Tvve e I Sandl Sea '200 -1.6 Practical use of this table is limited to situations where 'T' is lass than inside diameter. (1) Average velocity in pipe or bottom velocity in energy dissipater, whichever is greater. (2) If desired riprap and filter blanket class is not available, use neat larger class. (3) Filter blanket thickness - 1 Foot or 'T ", whichever is less. (4) Standard Specifications for Public Work. Construction. (5) D.G. w DiSintegrated Granite. 1 MM to 10 M. P.B. s Processed Miscellaneous Base. Type B w Type B b.ddinq mat.ri.l, (minimum 751 crushed particle,, 1001 passing I 1 /2' sieve, 10% pass inq 1" •lave). (6) Sand 75% retained on 1200 sieve. 6 PERCENTAGE LARGER THAN' I CLASSES l I I I ROCK I 1 11/1 11 // 1 NO. 2 1 N073 1 I SIZES 12 TON I1 TON I TON I TON BACBINGIBACEIN01 I I_III I I I l 4 TON 1 0.5 I I I I I I 1 2 TON 150 -1001 0 -5 I I I I 1 1 TON 195 - 100150 -1001 0 -5 1 1 1 I 11/2 TON I I — 150 -1001 0 -5 1 1 I 11/4 TON 1 195 -1001 — 150 -1001 I 1200 LS I I i9s -1001 — I I I 175 LB I 1 I 195 -1001 0 -s I 1 25 LB I I I 1 1 25 -75 1 0 -5 1 1 5 LB I 1 I 1 190 -100 1 25 -75 1 11 LB I I I I I 1 90 -1001 I I_I_III I I 'The amount of material smaller than the smallest site listed in the table for any class of rack slope protection shall not exceed the percentage limit Ilatad in the table determined on a weight basis. Compliance with the percentage limit shown in the table for all other sires of the individual piece• of any class of rock slope protection shall be determined by the ratio of the number of individual pieces larger then the smallest al re listed in the table for that class also pertaining to •200- 1.6.1. ST. FLOW DEPTH @ DP #6 (AREAS G +J) Worksheet for Irregular Channel Project Description 0.015 Project File c: \ldata \working.fm2 Worksheet DP6, CURB INLET Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Water Elevation Input Data Channel Slope 0.016000 ft/ft Elevation range: 0.00 ft to 0.50 ft. Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Start Station End Station Roughness 0.00 0.50 0.00 13.50 0.015 1.50 0.00 3.50 0.13 13.50 0.33 Discharge 5.33 cfs 10 p Results Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.015 Water Surface Elevation 0.33 ft Y Flow Area 1.67 ft' Wetted Perimeter 12.94 ft Top Width 12.88 ft Height 0.33 ft Critical Depth 0.37 ft Critical Slope 0.005957 ft/ft Velocity 3.20 fUs Velocity Head 0.16 ft Specific Energy 0.49 ft Froude Number 1.57 Flow is supercritical. CUIZ& Ot?EI.l iWG LV- 11 GTt-1 `i%Q V L= G o. 3 — O.r%i A 4Y,I I — 3 L= ;A.2 Usk 15 Lo1JG cpE�lu� 03/29/99 FlowMasler v5.11 12:03:52 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 Cross Section DP #6 Cross Section for Irregular Channel Project Description ------------------------------------ -------------- Project File c: \ldata \working.fm2 Worksheet DP6, CURB INLET Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Water Elevation Section Data Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.015 Channel Slope 0.016000 ft/ft Water Surface Elevation 0.33 ft 1dnTEe EL . Qo W W OY. f Discharge 5.33 cis v. ------------------------------------ -------------- 0.45 --------- - -----------�-----------i - 0.35 - ---------- -----------•-- ----------- ----- it c 0 0.25 - -- - - -- -- ----------------------- ----------- ----- -------- --------- N Ld 0.15 - - - -- ----- ----------- I -------`----------=------ --- -----'-----------`-----------' 0.1 - - - - -- - - - -- ------------------------------------------------ ----- --- 0.05 ------- ----- --- --- --- -- -------- --- --- - - - -- 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 Station (ft) 03/29/99 FlowMaster v5.11 12.04'.06 PM Haestao Methods. Inc 37 Brookside Road Waterbury 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 18 "RCP (DP #6 TO DP #7), CRITICAL DEPTH Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description ft = Project File c.V data %working.fm2 Worksheet DP #6 TO DP #7, CRITICAL DEPTH Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.005912 ft/ft Diameter 18.00 in Discharge 5.33 cfs Results Depth Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Percent Full Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Maximum Discharge Full Flow Capacity Full Flow Slope Flow is subcritical. 0.89 ft = �c 1.09 ft' 2.64 ft 1.47 ft 0.89 ft 59.31 0.005912 ft/ft 4.88 ft/s = V C- 0.37 ft 1.26 ft 1.00 8.69 cfs 8.08 cfs 0.002575 ft/ft v, z� G4 4 Zo7.39 +1.44 Zo3.83 M111. Sox De-Fru N -X cl�- - 03/30/99 FlowMaster v5 11 11:45:23 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 18 "RCP (DP #6 TO DP #7), NORMAL DEPTH Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File c: \ldata \working.fm2 Worksheet DP #6 TO DP #7 Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.010000 ft/ft Diameter 18.00 in Discharge 5.33 cfs Results Depth 0.76 ft G t.s bL Flow Area 0.89 ft' Wetted Perimeter 2.37 ft Top Width 1.50 ft Critical Depth 0.89 ft Percent Full 50.44 Critical Slope 0.005912 ft/ft Velocity 5.97 ft/s Velocity Head 0.55 ft Specific Energy 1.31 ft Froude Number 1.36 Maximum Discharge 11.30 cfs Full Flow Capacity 10.50 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.002575 ft/ft Flow is supercritical. 03/30/99 FlowMaster v5.11 10 .43 02 AM Haeslad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 ST. FLOW DEPTH @ DP #7 (AREA K) Worksheet for Irregular Channel Project Description Project File c: lldatalworking.fm2 Worksheet DP7, CURB INLET Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Water Elevation Input Data Channel Slope 0.016000 ft/ft Elevation range. 0.00 ft to 0.50 ft. Station (ft) Elevation (ft) Start Station End Station Roughness 0.00 0.50 0.00 13.50 0.015 1.50 0.00 3.50 0.13 13.50 0.33 Discharge 0.92 cfs - QIoo Results Wild. Mannings Coefficient 0.015 Water Surface Elevation 0.20 ft = Y Flow Area 0.42 ft' Wetted Perimeter 5.88 ft Top Width 5.85 ft Height 0.20 ft Critical Depth 0.22 ft Critical Slope 0.007637 ft/ft Velocity 2.17 fUs Velocity Head 0.07 ft Specific Energy 0.27 ft Froude Number 1.42 Flow is supercritical . cuRa opEUluU LEu�rM QEc,?D A-0 3-3 L = rrz (A +r)''s I USE; 4 r Louh p1791`1106i 03/29/99 FlowMaster v5.11 12,08 15 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1566 Page 1 of 1 Cross Section DP#7 Cross Section for Irregular Channel Project Description Project File c:lldatalworking.fm2 Worksheet DP7, CURB INLET Flow Element Irregular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Water Elevation Section Data Wtd. Mannings Coefficient 0.015 Channel Slope 0.016000 ft/ft Water Surface Elevation 0.20 ft uo-r t=L-Ow OVSV_ cQoklJ- Discharge 0.92 cfs 0. -- ------ ---- ------ - ----- -- -- - -- --- -------- ---- ---- - - -- --- -- --- 0.45 -------- -- 0.35 - -------------------------------- 0.3 - - ----- ------ --- '-- ---- -----`----- --- -- -- - - - - -- - ------ --- - ----- Z 0 0.25 --- ------------ ----------- ------- +--- -- -- d lL 0.2 ---- ------- •---- 0.15 - _ _____, 1 , 0.1 ---- - ----- ---- - - -- ----- -- ----- --- ---- ------- ---- - ----- -- -- -F--1 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 Station (ft) 12.0 14.0 0329199 FlowMaster v5.11 12:08:31 PM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1686 Page 1 of 1 18 "RCP (DP #7 TO DP #8) CRITICAL DEPTH Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File c: \1data \working.fm2 Worksheet DP #7 TO DP #8, CRITICAL DEPTH Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.006347 ft/ft Diameter 18.00 in Discharge 6.25 cfs Results Depth 0.97 ft = loC Flow Area 1.20 ft' Wetted Perimeter 2.80 ft Tap Width 1.44 ft Critical Depth 0.97 ft Percent Full 64.43 Critical Slope 0.006347 ft/ft Velocity 5.19 ft/s = VC Velocity Head 0.42 ft Specific Energy 1.39 ft Froude Number 1.00 Maximum Discharge 9.00 cfs Full Flow Capacity 8.37 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.003541 ft/ft Flow is subcntical. 1.60 . P. r1 H W El = Zol + I.(o� 7 -Z I? I 4 11 03/30/99 FlowMaster v5 11 10.4415 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury. CT 06708 (203) 755 -1665 Page t of 1 18 "RCP (DP #7 TO DP#8) NORMAL DEPTH Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description 0.83 Project File c:l1 data\working.fm2 Worksheet DP #7 TO DP #8 Flow Element Circular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.010000 ft/ft Diameter 18.00 in Discharge 6.25 cfs Results Depth 0.83 ft G 1 . 5 O IL Flow Area 1.01 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 2.52 ft Top Width 1.49 It Critical Depth 0.97 ft Percent Full 55.54 Critical Slope 0.006347 ft/ft Velocity 6.20 ft/s Velocity Head 0.60 ft Specific Energy 1.43 ft Froude Number 1.33 Maximum Discharge 11.30 cfs Full Flow Capacity 10.50 cfs Full Flow Slope 0.003541 Will: Flow is supercritical. G o P �IFATUr 4o. 4.51 U119E, w1 LoIJC-9 of No. 3 PPcKIuU C?,(O t T (1G IL 1�:1l isc CSLn>JKE—r 03/30/99 FlowMaslef v5.11 10'.41.33 AM Haesta0 Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 �AccvcAno�/S 7d _I/Erz�Fy 77147— /°*,AofEa . &ES Nor E)e4rdn <u� /Iurt,� �/1EDEV62o�D, IVUMA.10.46 -1; /) 4"6121 EXisAtiG sn✓c� oaf+,N sysrr�� F� �, gP -/83_ 71 E�,tna/G PPf LL�Lt2aRa �,ou �(i,vu� �j1C�,� S,n /s 3s.v CFs. 2) PEZ:;ZM'AC 77e 1ItNO64jf17M E&al?non/ 12Emu /,ab *lr Ey/sr. %POVJ n, 7;V,s 30'/240 7a "11&'H" 35,o Cis /A/ro Esc,srAtw- /-'V 3> AMOM,&C- /F 77h' 4A.IdFf Gv,ec %POVJ n, 7;V,s OEM, GL,eiNG A /GO y,� �kclvl l� 443�'0 -rz, 04411 3.5- Crs,np 4, S 7YA�r Pow Arn/tf �,,� Nrr F,Xedt -D 7?W 96 -ou,4.4;-0 72 SS'o Ce /ran 6X1r1M4r S'/sa9'111 S� C57N000L� /}�7iT � E�itPN(i �"',eFSr,�•� e9T'T%fz� 3o'Rc/ G,I�t /air of /,t G�7t�uno+✓ /,S'•9sn/ f /�co �� LG� 77/� PosT Oa�Z�; 7Nr obk v,cc Nor becct� 3s.o C'FS QUEx nIE 1.��'/lnnv o,c � //.a yiz � x:3r. Zole-3 - A.cncY GX.tr+v:� SZi¢r,r��irw_ x.71*,. 88 -/83 -- -- — - 36 ".Je12 Q- 3 tr Y _ FLcw!v - — - -�c – Z. (vg' f = 7/.7 4- Z68 4-_OS (- J 0,90 = �1lET 6oX� a= ?/ ycfr /E _ /9/.Z2 "' s,+�•��xcr+ � �`IG•1 10' 193 83rt NGDIE_ _� (7 eTirN dvx� _ (tZ 7d. `i l E _ /� (. VY Sear. z9<- „013 s) l S 9.96s 3404-'-3 f/ -/.5 D fd = TO" Q/'PO /.ni /= C'C I 1 .M OV, �= 19�:�5� of • SU�,�3 = /9�.z/ 7a 04,-W3,4 - . - . - -- ?/rtc /� sro�,�i��va vr•� cry /aa ��v�+vr= / /vsf06Y• Bioo — - - - -- --- -- _ 4/7:/ �aL✓ C`�r•va S7v/j�+ inTZ H� PoyQ_S�s'FHcS i 13, =su cF -- �/LR AT e)?"J7 Y4 ,we".-, 00?r (fib' -M- ov /JCwD �n0 /Ccaw !v!L Cis ,:ZAC Gcr(,c /C47r- ��G 36 CAS Ll?& pEti Oia� HYDROLOGY ANALYSIS For TM 88 -183 CITY OF ENCINITAS Prepared by: SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. January 15, 1991 SDE 3529.01 OCEAN VIEW ESTATES 1D � 51991 i -� i oQpOFESSIOy� Engineer of Work: 4 ff si w H N3 C4.3-3i C -54 i spa 0 "AIL Stephen D. Dillemuth, R.C.E. 28479 FOF CAU • Expires 3r1/94 Area Designator A A A - 1 - 2 - 3 A A A - 4 - 5 - 6 A A A - 7 - 8 - 9 l� A A - 10 - 11 A - 12 B -1* B -2* B -3 i B -4 V 1 B - q B - 5 6 B -7* B -8 Hei ht SDS -� c -I* Sys -4(o - I x N w 0 5 U33N a,�'i TABLE 1 - DRAINAGE AREA FLOW CALCULATIONS Time of Runoff Len th Hei ht Concentration Intensity Area Coefficient Flow (LJ� (H� Tc 1(100) A C Q(100) (1) (2) (3) (4) 202 9 10 5.05 0.11 0.45 0.2 450 50 10 5.05 0.25 0.45 0.6 170 27 11 4.75 0.10 0.45 0.2 1,600 125 16 3.73 20.85 0.45 35.0 811 55 10 5.05 0.44 0.45 1.0 811 55 10 5.05 0.47 0.45 1.1 1,250 105 10 5.05 0.57 0.45 1.3 900 77 14 4.07 1.25 0.45 2.3 800 54 14 4.07 1.53 0.45 2.8 230 13 12 4.49 0.16 0.45 0.3 850 79 14 4.07 1.92 0.45 3.5 1,100 95 14 4.07 7.14 0.45 13.1 398 11 10 5.05 0.32 0.45 0.7 2,002 138 10 5.05 1.43 0.45 3.2 414 79 12 4.49 1.97 0.45 4.0 790 91 13 4.27 2.91 0.45 5.6 541 29 10 5.05 0.22 0.45 0.5 338 16 10 5.05 0.24 0.45 0.5 541 29 10 5.05 0.21 0.45 0.5 1,030 82 14 4.07 1.80 0.45 3.3 5,750 324 29 2.54 310.89 0.45 355.3 158 15 10 5.05 0.09 0.45 0.2 163 3 10 5.05 0.15 0.45 0.3 453 78 12 4.49 0.76 0.45 1.5 0 5 U33N a,�'i I J-. - .,Wmi NAWEA AY JOVW t! 0 P 1. O n. -P U.j Outlet - NO] K, STORM pr sys -j IW SG14EMA'TIC W cA1dataIA460 -2.stm 04/27/99 10'46'41 AM San Dieguito Engineering Haeslad Methods, Ine. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1866 iLa11=IEC3 Project Englneer: Barry Munson StormCAD 0.0 Page 1 of 1 Inlet: NODE B Inlet: NODE C Rim: 206.43 ft Rim: 206.43 ft Sump: 188.92 ft Sump: 191:22 ft Outlet: Outlet/- NODE Rim: 192.00 Sump: 187. 4 ft 208.00 . 206.00 Inlet: HEADWALL -NODE H Rim: 201.00 ft Sump: 192.00 ft 204.00 Junction: NODE D Rim: 201.00 ft Sump: 191.44 ft N c,L L 202.00 200.00 198.00 Elevation ft 196.00 194.00 192.00 Pipe: Ex 36 -2 \ \ Up- invert: 191.22h 190.00 Pipe: Ex 30" Dn Invert: 190.92 ftpipe: Ex 36 -3 Up Invert: 192.00 ft Length: 33.00 ft Up Invert: 191.44 ft Dn Invert: 191.48 ft Size: 36 inch Dn Invert: 191.26 ft Length: 55.00 ft Pipe: Ex 36 -1 - Length: 25.00 ft 188.00 Size: 30 inch Up Invert: 188.92 ft Size: 36 inch Dn Invert: 187.34 ft Length: 41.00 ft 186.00 Size: 36 inch 0 +00 0 +20 0 +40 0 +60 0 +80 1 +00 1 +20 1 +40 1 +60 Station ft Project Engineer: Barry Munson c: \ldalaA"0 -2.stm San Dieguito Engineenng StonnCAD 0.0 04/27/99 10:45.15 AM Haeatad Methods. Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury. CT 08708 (203)755-IOM Page 1 of 1 n- T Inlet: NODE B Rim: 206.43 ft Sump: 188.92 ft Outlet: Outlet -NODE A Rim: 192.00 ft / Sump: 187.34 ft/ 0 +00 Inlet: NODE C Rim: 206.43 ft Sump: 191.22 ft n . . 206.00 - L _. I 204.00 Junction: NODE D Rim: 201.00 ft Sump: 191.44 ft 202.00 Inlet: Headwall -NODE E Rim: 201 .00 ft Sump: 197.00 ft 200.00 F14 L \I' Pipe: Ex 36 -2 Up Invert: 191.22 ft \ Dn Invert: 190.92 ft Length: 33.00 ft Size: 36 inch ipe: Ex 36 -1 Up Invert: 188.92 ft Dn Invert: 187.34 ft Length: 41.00 ft Size: 36 inch 0 +20 0 +40 0 +60 0 +80 1 +00 Station ft Elevation ft 196.00 94.00 192.00 Pipe: P -11 Up Invert: 197.00 ft Dn Invert: 191.48 ft Length: 17.00 ft 190.00 Size: 18 inch 188.00 Pipe: Ex 36 -3 Up Invert: 191.44 ft Dn Invert: 191.26 ft 186.00 Length: 25.00 ft 1 +20 Size: 36 inch Project Engineer. Barry Munson c \l data44460 -2. stm San Dieguito Engineering StormCAD v10 04/27/99 105632 AM Haestad Methods. Inc 37 Brookside Road Waterbury 06708 (203) 755 1666 Page 1 of 1 x 0 w c'. Udata\4460 -2 slm 04/27/99 1051:48 AM San Dieguito Engineering Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Project Engineer. Barry Munson SIOMCAD v1.0 Page 1 of 1 Combined P Node Report Pipe Up Node On Node Length (h) Size S (tuft) V avg (ft/s) Up Invert (ft) Up HGL (ft) Dn Invert (ft) Dn HGL (ft) O (cfs) Cap (cfs) Inlet O (cfs) TC (min) P -11 Headwall -NODE E NODE D 17.00 18 inch ).324706 6.63 197.00 198.28 191.48 197.80 11.15 59.85 11.15 7.50 Ex 30" HFADWALL-NODE NODE D 55.00 30 inch ).009455 9.54 192.00 198.52 191.48 197.80 46.84 39.88 46.84 9.50 Ex 24 -2 NODE G NODE F 284.00 24 inch ) 143239 9.97 238.68 240.56 198.00 202.15 30.91 85.61 30.91 10.00 Ex 24 -1 NODE F NODE D 199.00 24 inch ) 030251 9.55 197.50 201.30 191.48 197.80 3000 39.34 N/A N/A Ex 36-3 NODE D NODE C 25.00 36 inch ) 007200 1149 191.44 195.75 191.26 195.38 81.24 56.59 N/A N/A Ex 36-2 NODE C NODE B 3300 36 inch ) D09091 11.82 191.22 194.32 190.92 193.71 82.21 6359 1.46 7.50 Ex 36 -1 NODE B Outlet - NODE 41 00 36 inch) 038537 13.82 188.921191 71 187.34 18944 82.49 130.93 1 0.64 7.50 R� c F- II W Project Engineer. Barry Munson c. \i data41460 -2.stm San Dieguito Engineering StormCAD v10 04/27/99 1049'.26 AM Haestad Methods. Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury. CT 06708 (203) 7551666 Page 1 of 1 J TZ X, X, .11 vi Nodt port Node Discharge (cfs) Rim Elevation (ft) HGL In (8) HGL Out (ft) Inlet Discharge (Ms) System Intensity (in /hr) Total CA (acres) Upstream Flow Time (min) Description Headwall -NODE E 11.15 201.00 198.28 198.28 11.15 6.09 1.82 000 Area A -3 HEADVVALL-NODE 46.84 201.00 198.52 198.52 46.84 5.22 8.89 0.00 NODE G 30.91 248.00 240.56 240.56 30.91 5.05 6.07 000 Areas A -5 -1: NODE F 30.00 202.50 202.15 201.30 N/A 491 6.07 10.47 EX C/O NODE D 81.24 201.00 197.80 195.75 N/A 4.80 16.78 10.82 EX C/O NODE C 82.21 206.43 195.38 194.32 1.46 479 17.02 10.86 Area A -2 NODE 82.49 206.43 192.84 191.71 0.64 4.78 17.12 10.91 AREAA -1 Outlet - NODE A NIA 1 192.00 189.07 189.07 NIA 1 4.77 17.12 10 951 OUTLET c. \ldala\4460 -2 stm 04/27/99 10 48.37 AM San Dieguito Engineering Haestad Methods. Inc 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Project Engineer. Barry Munson StormCAD v1 .D Page 1 of 1 DOI aort Pipe -Node- Up Dn Inlet A (acres) Inlet CA (acres) Tot CA (acres) - Ground- Up Dn (ft) -HGL- Up Dn (ft) - Slope Energy Constructed (tuft) - Section- Discharge Capacity (cfs) - Section- Shape Size Length (ft) V avg (fUs) Description P -11 Headwall -NODE E 404 1 82 1.82 201.00 198.28 0.035907 11.15 Circular 17.00 6.63 NODE D 201 00 197.80 0324706 59.85 18 inch Ex 30" HEADWALL-NODE 18.53 889 8.89 201.00 198.52 0.013044 46.84 Circular 55.00 954 NODE D 201.00 197.80 0.009455 39.88 30 inch Ex 24 -2 NODE G 13.48 6.07 6.07 24800 240.56 0.135520 30.91 Circular 284.00 9.97 NODE F 202.50 202.15 0.143239 85.61 24 inch Ex 24 -1 NODE F N/A N/A 6.07 202.50 201.30 0.017583 30.00 Circular 199.00 9.55 NODE D 201.00 197.80 0.030251 3934 24 inch Ex 36 -3 NODE D N/A N/A 16.78 201.00 195.75 0.014837 81.24 Circular 25.00 11.49 NODE C 205.60 195.38 0007200 56.59 36 inch Ex 36 -2 NODE C 0.25 0.24 17.02 205.60 194.32 0.014524 82.21 Circular 33.00 11 82 NODE B 205.60 193.71 0.009091 63.59 36 inch Ex 36 -1 NODE B Oil 0.10 17.12 205.60 191.71 0.017997 82.49 Circular 41.00 13.82 O 192 00 189 44 0.038537 130.93 36 inch f( V) Project Engineer Barry Munson c 11 dalaM460 -2. slm San Diegwlo Engineering SlofmCAD v10 04/27/99 10.47.58 AM Haestad Methods. Inc 37 Brookside Road Waterbury 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 Description: Areas A -5 -12 Protect Engineer: Barry Munson c \1databi460 -2.stm San Dieguito Engineering StormCAD v10 04/27/99 10:57.42 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 or 1 AJ2 ';AO/4 // JL /. Detailed Report for NODE G Watershed Information Area C (acres) 13.48 0.45 Total 13.48 0.45 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 13.48 acres Inlet C 0.45 Inlet CA 6.07 acres Time of Concentration 10.00 min Inlet Intensity 5.05 in /hr Inlet Discharge 30.91 cfs Flows Description Description Total Discharge 30.91 cfs Known Flaw 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 30.91 cfs Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data Description Description System Intensity 5.05 in /hr Upstream CA 0.00 acres Total CA 6.07 acres Inlet CA 6.07 acres Bernal CA 0.00 acres Flow Times Description Description System Flow Time 10.00 min Upstream Flow Time 0.00 min Inlet TC 10.00 min External TC 0.00 min Elevations Description Description HGL In 240.56 It HGL Out 240.56 ft Ground Elevation 248.00 't Rim Elevation 248.00 It Other Properties Description Description X 706,507.07 ft V 324,891.42 It Velocity 10.10 fus Headloss 0.79 It Headloss Coefficient 0.50 Station 5 +82 ft External Flow 0.00 cfs Description: Areas A -5 -12 Protect Engineer: Barry Munson c \1databi460 -2.stm San Dieguito Engineering StormCAD v10 04/27/99 10:57.42 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 or 1 AJ2 ';AO/4 // JL /. X Detailed Report for HEADWALL -NODE H 'Natershed Information 324.649.10 ft Velocity Area C Headloss 0.71 fl (acres) 0.50 Station 1 +54 it 18.53 048 External Flow 0.00 cfs Total 18.53 0.48 Rational Formula Inlet Drainage Area 18.53 acres Inlet C 0.48 Inlet CA 8.89 acres Time of Concentration 9.50 min Inlet Intensity 5.22 in /hr Inlet Discharge 46.84 cfs Flows Description / z GF / 3 Description Total Discharge 46.84 cfs Known Flow 0.00 cfs Upstream Additional + Carryover 0.00 cfs Total Watershed (CIA) 46.84 cis Carryover 0.00 cfs Additional Flow 0.00 cfs Watershed Data Description Description System Intensity 5.22 in /hr Upstream CA 0.00 acres Total CA 8.89 acres Inlet CA 8.89 acres xternal CA 0.00 acres Flow Times Description Description System Flow Time 9.50 min Upstream Flow Time 0.00 min Inlet TC 9.50 min External TC 0.00 min Elevations Description Description HGL In 198.52 ft HGL Out 198.52 It Ground Elevation 201.00 ft Rim Elevation 201.00 ft Other Properties Description Description X 706,154.63 It Y 324.649.10 ft Velocity 9.54 Ws Headloss 0.71 fl Headloss Coefficient 0.50 Station 1 +54 it External Flow 0.00 cfs Project Engineer: Barry Munson c: \ldatav4460 -2.stm San Dieguito Engineering StormCAD v1_0 04/27/99 10:59:34 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755 -1666 Page 1 of 1 �If�i�n.oy� / z GF / 3 10+00 F-77 WER JL X %o %-./ x x J -A-i K-) SCALES: HORZ. 1 " = 40' VERT. 1 of = 8' . . ..................... ......... . ................. . ... .. C%t ......................... + vj M X —20.00r -1a --- - oi;ocz . ..... . ..... 2 = ....... . . ......... -Zozg &-ZO F7 ----- ------ 280 -- -_7=J ------- - . ......... . . cm 200 Co u A M> CD C4 .................. v 190 t- CC 41J CL = Z03.8 3.. Ala FL S 510 STORM DRAIN 49+25 (SEE PLAN VIEW ON SHEET 3/5) SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. Undommunei Z.7-71=7-77=1 . ............ .... . . . .............. . .. ............ ....... ...... z 94 CL ................. ..... . ........... . . . ...... .............. . . . ............ ... . . ............... .. ........... ........... . .. ......... .......... —_2 W:Q:3 . ..... ........ ...... .......... . — — — ---------- — — -------- ---- — ------------ . ...... .... — - ------ - . . . . . . ........... C32 — --- ------- ---- -- 1 00 Chu ------ ---- ........................ U- 0- m . ...... . ........ ....... . ................. ......... . ........... Nx c C-4 a- Le) z .......... [1�41 L Le) 12 9 0 V. yfiv U') to .............. CL M ........... — old C4 z ZZO.Z fs"f% -,hv ins ---- --------------- .......... 'Y5,JW 2,V-' RGP -------- 7—f-4- 0 4.22% L� CL . ............ ----------------------- --------- — -------- . . . .... ...... ... .......... ...... ...................... .... . ..... 'A .. .. ......... ......... . C-4 C� . --- --- ----------------------------- ------- ---- ...... ........... .. ------------------ cn--- � .............. .. . . . ......... 44 CP) LO I .� a CN Ll s . ...... .... .... . ............ IAI .......... . . — — ------------- - ----- - — -- — - - — ----- ---- ---- ------ . .......... — -------------- ------------ "- 60' 24* KP ................................ —.— . . .... ..................... — ---- ----- . . .............. .............. co n 0� In CD LO CD .............. .... t . ..... ......... ................. . . .......... WK ...... . ............ _ -_._.. ROFILES I-.---, . ... .... .. . . . . ..................... . ..... . . . .. .. ..... .. .. .. ..................... . .............. - --- --- -- -- ---------------- . ......... . .. _- . . ............ ... kLL-�: HORZ. 1 40 VERT. 1 444-- 45+9G:t --- - -- SH-E -3/5)--- HYDROLOGY MAP SAN DEGurTo ENGINEERING. INC. INC. 10/26 A -7 N— _I, =IM 9 C. SDE 4460 JAL ENGINEERING • PLANNING I * I LANG SURVEYORS I DF`1 Q100=19.07CFS V100=12.8FPS DP2 Q100=25.19CFS Vl 00=8.OFPS DP3 Q100=31.54CFS V100=15.9FPS DF`4 Q100=32.55CFS V100=9.27FPS DP5 Q100--35.69CFS V100=3.66FPS DP6 Q100=5.33CFS Vl 00=6.OFPS DF`7 Q100=6.25CFS V100=6.2FPS DP8 Q100=6.25CFS Vl 00=6.2FPS ST RIPPABILM ANALYSIS Mr. Al F. Mayo 1682 Kettering Street Irvine, California 92714 ... . 1 JUL - 8 19N L Southern California Soil and Testing, Incorporated Post office Box 20627 6280 Riverdale Street San Diego, California 92120 St-j, j SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA T= ' SOIL &TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Street, San Diego, CA 92120 P0. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160 -0627 619 -280 -0321, FAX 619- 280 -4717 May 21, 1990 Mr. Al F. Mayo 1682 Kettering Street Irvine, California 92714 SCS &T 8921055 Report No. 3 SUBJECT: Rippability Analysis for Deep Sewer Trench, Rancho de Mayo Subdivision, Encinitas, California. Dear Mr. Mayo: In accordance with your request we have performed three seismic refraction traverses in select areas of the proposed sewer trench. The findings of our survey and the locations of the seismic traverses are presented herewith. If you should have any questions regarding this report, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CAL IA SOIL Q04114' /4 s R. High,'C.E.G. FROM TESTING, INC. cc: (3) Submitted (3) San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. (1) SCS &T, Escondido R NO 1237 CERTIFIED ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST 630-90 %.-F CAL \F Introduction................................. ..............................1 Findings..................................... ..............................1 General............................. ..............................1 Seismic Traverses No. S -1 through Traverse No. S- 3 ................2 Seismic Traverse No. S- 3R ........... ..............................3 Rippability Characteristic of Granitics ...........................3 Rippable Condition (0 -4,500 Ft. /Sec.) ........................ 3 Marginally Rippable Condition (4,500 Ft./Sec. -5,500 Ft./Sec..3 Nonrippable Condition (5,500 Ft./Sec. & Greater) .............4 SeismicTraverse Limitations ........ ..............................4 Plate 1 Plot Plan Plates 2 -4 Seismic Traverses Plates 5 -6 Rippability Charts SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA �.. SOIL &TESTING. INC. \ i 6280 Riverdale Street. San Diego. CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160 -0627 619.2804321, FAX 619- 280 -4717 ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA I vl5/ _ / The intent of the seismic refraction survey was specifically to facilitate the project planning by determining the variation in seismic velocity of the underlying materials and to determine a reasonable approximation of the depth from the surface to the boundaries between rippable, marginally rippable, and nonrippable bedrock. Three seismic traverses were performed by our firm in May 1990. These traverses were positioned along the proposed sewer trench within areas with the deepest, anticipated excavations. The seismograph's depth of investigation is closely related to the length of the seismic traverse. For a particular length of traverse, e.g., 100 feet, using a ratio of 3:1 between length and depth, we conclude that this length of survey line will detect the boundaries between Materials of varying density and velocity to depths ranging to approximately 33 feet. The maximm length of traverse in this survey is 120 feet, which should reach a depth of approximately 40 feet. (ORAL: The results of our seismic traverses indicate that the materials are marginally rippable to nonrippable to the proposed depths, however, it SCS &T 8921055 May 21, 1990 Page 2 will be very slow and difficult, therefore blasting may be more economical to achieve the proposed cuts. It should be noted that the materials underlying the areas of the three seismic traverses are comprised of very dense sandstones, mudstones and conglomerates of the Lusardi Formation. These materials will generally have the same rippability characteristics of dense, decomposed granitic. The results of the seismic traverses are presented below and on Plate Numbers 2 through 4 and the locations are indicated on Plate Number 1. The apparent velocities were measured at both ends of the seismic traverses, and the seismic traverse performed in the opposite direction is designated as Number R. Apparent Velocities Traverse ft /sec. CAments Traverse No. S-1 0' -13' 2,900 Rippable Topsoils and weathered Bedrock 13' -40' 6,000 Marginally Rippable to Nonrippable Bedrock Traverse No. S -1R 01- 8' 1,750 Rippable Topsoils and weathered Bedrock 8' -40' 5,000 Marginally Rippable Bedrock Traverse No. S -2 01- 9' 2,700 Rippable Topsoils and weathered Bedrock 9-33' 5,400 Marginally Rippable Bedrock Traverse No. S -2R 0' -10' 2,500 Rippable Topsoils and weathered Bedrock 10' -33' 6,000 Marginally Rippable to Nonrippable Bedrock Traverse No. S -3 0'- 4' 1,500 Rippable Topsoils 4' -15' 3,700 Rippable Bedrock 15-33' 6,000 Marginally Rippable to Nonrippable Bedrock SCS &T 8921055 May 21, 1990 Page 3 Apparent velocities Traverse ft /sec. Cc ments Traverse No. S -3R 0'- 5' 1,200 Rippable Topsoils 5' -17' 3,900 Rippable Bedrock 17' -33' 6,000 Marginally Rippable to Nonrippable Bedrock RIPPABILITY C1iARACTERISTIC OF GRANITICS: The following describes the rippability characteristics of granitic rock materials in regards to the velocity of soundwaves through the rock. The rippability characteristics of the Lusardi Formation will be similar to dense decomposed granitic bedrock, however no oversized material is anticipated to be generated from the excavations within the Lusardi Formation. RIPPABLE CONDITION (0 -4,500 F-r./SEC.): This velocity range indicates rippable materials similar to decomposed granitics. These materials will break down into slightly silty, well graded sand. Some areas may contain localized hardrock areas and nay present utility trench problems. Materials within the velocity range of frorn 3,500 to 4,000 fps are rippable with difficulty by backhoes and other light trenching equipment. MARGINALLY RIPPABLE CONDITION (4,500 FT./SEC.-5,500 FT./SEC.): This range is rippable with effort by a D -9 in only slightly weathered granitics. This velocity range may also include numerous localized hardrock areas with the possibility of extensive areas of materials which are more similar to fractured granitics instead of decomposed granitics. Excavations in the Lusardi Formation is anticipated to be slow and produce material that will partially break down into a coarse, slightly silty to clean sand, but may contain a high percentage of +1/4" material. Materials within this velocity range are beyond the capability of backhoes and lighter trenching equipment. Difficulty of excavation would also be realized by gradalls and other heavy trenching equipment. SCS &T 8921055 May 21, 1990 Page 4 NMRIPPABLE OC DITION (5,500 FT./SEC. & GTATER): This velocity range includes nonrippable material consisting primarily of moderately fractured granitics and highly indurated sediments at lower velocities and only slightly fractured or unfractured rock at higher velocities. In its natural state, it is not desirable for subgrade due to difficulty in utility trench excavation. Blasting in granitics will produce oversize material requiring special disposal consideration, however oversized materials are not anticipated from the excavation of the sandstones of the Lusardi Formation. This upper limit has been based on rippability with a Caterpillar D-9 using a conventional #9 single shank ripper. However, this upper limit of rippability may some times be increased to 7,000 to 8,000 fps material using the D -9 mounted #9 Series D Ripper or other heavy excavation equipment. The rippability index presented above is a modification of charts prepared by the Caterpillar Company and an article in "Road and Streets ", September 1967. Also included as Plate Numbers 5 and 6 are rippability charts from the October 1986 Caterpillar Performance Handbook. It has been our experience that many of the local contractors cannot achieve the rippability levels as indicated in the 1986 handbook. These charts are presented as potential guidelines for planning the proposed project. SEISMIC TRAVERSE LlKn CHS: The results of the seismic survey for this investigation reflect rippability conditions only for the areas of the traverses. However, the conditions of the Lusardi Formation appears to be similar for the remainder of the site which is underlain by the Lusardi Formation and may be assumed to possess similar characteristics. our reporting is presently limited in that refraction seismic surveys do not allow for prediction for a percentage of expectable oversize or hardrock floaters. Subsurface variations in the degree of weathered rock to fractured rock are not accurately predictable. SCS &T 8921055 May 21, 1990 Page 5 The seismic refraction method requires that materials become increasingly dense with depth. In areas where denser, higher velocity materials are underlain by lower velocity materials, the lower velocity materials would not be indicated by our survey. All of the velocities used as upper limits for rippability are subject to fluctuation depending upon such local variations in rock conditions as: a) Fractures, Faults and Planes of weakness of Any Kind b) Weathering and Degree of Decomposition c) Brittleness and Crystalline Nature d) Grain Size It should be noted that ripping of higher velocity materials may become totally dependent on the time available and the economics of the project. Ripping of higher velocity materials can be achieved but it may become economically infeasible. LEGEND 1---I SEISMIC TRAVERSE LOCATION - - -- PROPERTY LINE SCALE 1 =200' 0 200 400 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TUMING. INC. rNlEM 1°ATE 5-14-90 "06 6821055 1 PLATE #1 SAN GIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS Iran R. Fox, P.E. Barry L Mo.. P.E. Cordon L. Me Elroy, P.LS. 'I Laurie Simon, Principal Planner �ILUI D G R L'Q1 CIVIL ENGINEERING June 8, 2001 ENGIAIggIA" Engiraenn8 $I W Ks �C QFENCIIN Sine pcvtl"pmem A,alyus Grading Plain City of Encinitas ""° Engineering Services Permits Drvnage Plans 505 South Vulcan Ave, Sewtr/WUer Line Plans DydmloeyMydraulRcs Encinitas, Co 92024 Conuw oon Adrmnnuanon Pavemen. ReNdlnumn Re: Engineer's Pad Certification for Project No. 98 -139 TM and FomnsK Eng.rcenng Grading Permit Number 6075 —G LAND PLANNING Pursuant to section 23.24.310 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad "r- At,oa,o"Anal "" Certification Letter for lots 1 through and including 4. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project. L UseCunsulunun I hereby state rough grading for these units has been completed in conformance with the attached plans and En•n.rcmal A.alysis requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. Govemmem Rdalions h D,no- renla"�M.,, 2124.310 (B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved My,x LIM Perms grading plan: S,ee'at Plans Retuning Pad Elevation Pod Elevation vrsanes Lot No. Per plan Per field measurement A"""nt°" "` N.11 1 235.0 235.0 Ano" o..rss 2 240.0 240.0 B000dx,Ad,onscim 3 218.0 219.5 LAND SURVEYING 4 212.0 214.8 Pmpeny Survey. Topogmpho.I Survtys 23.24.310 (8)1. Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices and /or retaining wall have con,l,vtlw„ suio.g been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. Records d So ay US.I Dncripuu.n 23.24.310 (8)5. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and ore in s "Wins —maps substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. Istemenn Nf1goualS C,a 23.24.310 (8)6. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field Cad.nnl $urven P ,ngmm aMsu<. ys verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. QRpf Sincerely, ES R. �% / O 'll Ivan R. Fox � Z President W CE� � IRF /ce s� CNIL �rFOF CO�� (760) 753 -5525 • FAX (760) 943 -8236 4107 Manchester Avenue • Suite 105 • Encinitas, California 92024 HYDROLOGY MAP-"APN 264-091-68" EL 2 HYDROLOGY ALL KEY MA DRAINAGE LEGEND FILL SLOPE CUT SLOPE Ell PROJECT BOUNDARY BASIN BOUNDARY A DRAINAGE BASIN AREA IN ACRES 100-YR STORM RUNOFF SAN IDIEGWO ENGWERM. ING 4407 E5 R, SUITE 105 EN INHAE, CA 11021 PHONE: (760) 753-5525 CIVL ENGINEERING • PLANNNO LAND SWVEYM 21- 7\ PN t-091 8 .79 AC. GROS 1.64 PAD E�L =l, SF PAD AREA. OK_ �7 PER DOC# 8 RECORDED 2 BK. 7 FILE 90. 4480 C-1 45 Ell Va PARCEL 1 of - 4I 1 1 �l �C.�,�Ross, AC N 1.6 AG . GROS� 1 1, I -M AC NET .0v /El 1 1 - �rPAD�,El_ PAC, EL . 212.0" PAD AREK 23,832 PA F 7" FL 214.5 29-- AC_ ,GPSS PAD 1 AC. N L = 215 --PAD A A -- 31312 SF R 21- 7\ PN t-091 8 .79 AC. GROS 1.64 PAD E�L =l, SF PAD AREA. OK_ �7 PER DOC# 8 RECORDED 2 BK. 7 FILE 90. 4480 ,x - /,-(, -9 31'45.22* ti lM O CONVERGENCE ANGLE AT STATION "FORTY' COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0,99995521 GRAPHIC SCAM 6 1 0, 120' 240' SCALE: 1" = 60' SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY PARCEL 1 2.724 ACRES (GROSS) 2.699 ACRES (NEF) PARCEL MAP NO. 18461 CITY OF ENCINITAS T.P.M. 98-139 SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS EASEMENT DETAIL RESERVATION FOR FUTURE PRIVATE IT WIDE REOREITIONAL EASEMENTS ROAD EASEMENT. PER MAP 'NO. 12S82. -T7`RML,"M,N`RVE` u �-4— ff] EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD AND EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT 3. Aly'? RECORDED 998 UDUF` 0 1 OFFICIAL APRIL 31 1 AS DOCUMENT N . 998-0187785 OF IL RECORDS. t�W PPJVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT RESERVED R EX PE MAP NO. 12882. RESTING 40' PRI E ROAD AMID UTILITY EAS EMT PER DOCUMENT CORDED APRtl-VAT 1998 AS DOCUMENT NOEM 1998-0187785 OF V OFFICIAL RECORDS. & 44 EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD AND UTIUTY EASEMENT PER DMUMET RECORDE 60' 19 D APRIL 98 AS DOCUMENT NO. 1998-0187785 OF E Rs U VaR OFFICIAL RECORD akK DETAIL rA Rw625 00 , —8, WIDE EASEMENT TO A17 W 'ECHE-,L(rEy Of ESCONDI 0 O 0 7 Ft I N17 2-E D P PROPOSED FLOWAGEV EASEMENT. PARCEL 3 3.152 ACRES (GROSS) 2.954 ACRES (NE7) PARCEL 4 1.658 ACRES (GROSS) 1.393 ACRES (NM N$6'3129'W 254.76 4, PARCEL 2 2.044 ACRES ((GROSS) , 9" ACRES (,El) r 12.00' WIDE EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS 2 PROPOSED 40 PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT. MAC CO PAW RECORDED 2/22/83 OyA 1 AS FILE NO. 83-055102 O.R. ;3,, 33'_ 20 "1 I D ,- 4 O S MER US EMENT TO THE CARDIFF SANITATION ITATION DISTRICT GRANTED HEREON Al DETAIL SCALE: I" = W' r N74'28114-iE(R) A REWNDER PARCEL o 1.801 ACRES (GROSS) C ES ( 1.651 ACRES g ,lN 4 483 33' EXISTING TEMPORARY TURNAROUND EASEMENT RECORDED 01/13/0 AS DOC N0. 20D0-0D19559 O.R. 1 PROPOSED 40 PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT. 10 THE OLIVENHMN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WATER EASEMENT HEREON EON 0 ^ 20 "1 I D ,- 4 O S MER US EMENT TO THE CARDIFF SANITATION ITATION DISTRICT GRANTED HEREON i LLLN2 DETAIL SCALE: I" = W' @ PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE S EASEMENT. IVA 10" EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN AND EQUESTRIAN TRAIL PURPOSES THE ACCESS EASEMENT TO CUMPWITH MAINTAIN THE TRAIL) ID HEREON. PROPOSED lo' PRIVATE SEWER EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1. PROPOSED --lORMl PRIVATE `CAD OS ` TOGETHER THE ORA FlEXCAVATION RIQ4 TO END AND MAINTAN AN D EMBANKMENT SLOPES BEYOND THE LIMITS UP SAID TO P- M� THE REOUIRED STREET R. M 99-014 ME COMPLETED. N74'28114-iE(R) A REWNDER PARCEL o 1.801 ACRES (GROSS) C ES ( 1.651 ACRES g ,lN 4 483 33' EXISTING TEMPORARY TURNAROUND EASEMENT RECORDED 01/13/0 AS DOC N0. 20D0-0D19559 O.R. 1 Wk op v 0 @1 o 14 69' N8540'1 CURVE TABLE LINE TARLI 20 "1 I D ,- 4 O _.PARCEL i LLLN2 DETAIL SCALE: I" = W' Wk op v 0 @1 o 14 69' N8540'1 CURVE TABLE LINE TARLI O i LLLN2 ,G_GG, LENGTH 1, S ----1 12/21/99 7 MANCHESTER, SUITE ID, PHONE. CALIF. COORD. INDEX 322-1701 (CCS 27) 1-0- �16.) 37SM-55. SDE 4460 CITY OF ENCINITAS cm Ut\lT TA\SURVE�S\4460$,ry \dg\Pa —I Map\4460—hW3.dIg GRADING PLAN 6062—G, 6075—G TRACT NO. qR-1,AQ ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects City of District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering April 12, 2000 Jesse R. Oakley 2171 Pavilion Drive Santa Ana, CA 92705 Re: Tentative Parcel Map 98 -139 "por SEIM SeC8 T13S R3W SBM" {Minor subdivision of 4 SFD -PCU1 REM -PCL @ s -ly end Wildflower Dr} Grading Application 6062GR [Private Road /Drain) Grading Application 6075GR [Rough Grading /Erosion Control] Improvement Application 6062IR [Public Trail /Deferred Monuments] Sewer Construction Application DCS315 [Public Sewerl A. P.N. 264 - 091 -58 Permit issuance requirements This correspondence shall serve to briefly summarize the Engineering Permit process. Drawing 6062 -G, Drawing 6075 -G, and Drawing CS -315 were all approved by the Director of Engineering Services on April 3, 2000, and will remain valid for three years. In order to obtain the necessary Engineering Permits to construct per these Drawings, you will need to satisfy the following requirements: (1) Ensure that the proposed Final Parcel Map is technically correct. (2) Provide 4 blueline prints each of the approved Drawings 6062 -G and 6075 -G, and 5 blueline prints of the approved Drawing CS -315. (3) Post Security Deposits as follows: (a)GRADING PERMIT 6062GI... in the amount of $203,204.00 to guarantee performance of private road and drainage improvements, and the associated earthwork and erosion control, (b)GRADING PERMIT 6075GI... in the amount of $138,669.00 to guarantee performance of earthwork, storm drainage, and erosion control, all associated with the rough grading, (c)IMPROVEMENT PERMIT 606211... in the amount of $1,000.00 to guarantee performance and payment of labor and materials for deferred land survey monuments, and (d)SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DCS315... in the amount of $65,412.00 to guarantee performance of public sewer improvements Of the amounts required for 3(a) and 3(b), an aggregate amount of $54,476.00 has to be in the form of cash, certificates of deposit, a letter of credit, or an assignment of account, any of which may be used for any full amount. The balance of the amounts in 3(a) and 31b), and 100% of the amounts in 3(c) and 3(d), may be in the MM /jsg/98- 139.doc I TEL 760- 633 -2(4)0 / FAT 760- 633.2627 505 S. Vulcan Arcnue. Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760- 633 -2700 �* recycled paper form of a Performance Bond, and, in the case of 3(c), a Labor and Materials Bond, issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Any financial instrument's format is subject to approval. (4) Pay non - refundable Inspection Fees and an Inspection Deposit, the latter subject to cost recovery, respectively, as follows: (a)GRADING PERMIT 6062GI... of $8,096.00, (b)GRADING PERMIT 6075GI... of $6,160.00, and (c)SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT... of $1.536.00. (5) Pay a Flood Control Fee of $4.514.00. The rate is $0.21 /SF and is assessed on the private road improvements. Additional assessments will be levied during the development of the parcels. (6) Provide the name, address, telephone number, and state license number and type of the construction contractor. Construction of the public sewer improvements is restricted to qualified contractors. The contractor will need to possess as follows either a valid: (a) Type "A" General Engineering, or (b) Type "C -34" Pipeline, state license, and meet the minimum insurance requirements as stated on the accompanying handout. (7) Provide a work schedule. (8) Sign the Permits and the Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreement Consent Statement, the latter of which must be signed by the property owner of record, the others by an authorized representative. Permits are valid for no more than one year and may expire earlier due to expirations on letters of credit and /or insurance policies. Once the Engineering Permits are issued, advance notice of 48 hours must be given prior to you or your contractor scheduling the mandatory pre - construction conference. See Grading Note #8 and Sewer Note #11. Informal phasing of the project may necessitate more than one such conference. Haul Routes and Transportation Permits are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division, who can be contacted at (760) 633 -2704. Pursuant to Fire Department rules and regulations, prior to any combustible materials being placed on -site, the private road shall have received its first lift of asphalt paving. Construction changes, prepared by the Engineer of Work, should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposit. MM /jsg/98- 139.doc2 Prior to issuance of any Building Permit, a rough grading approval will be needed from the assigned Engineering Inspector. At a minimum, rough grading is defined as certified pad preparation and soil compaction, substantial completion of improvements, and safe access. A proportional reduction of up to 75% of the Security Deposit assigned to the Grading Permit may be merited and forthcoming. As- builts of Drawing 6062 -G, Drawing 6075 -G, and Drawing CS -315, prepared by the Engineer of Work and approved by the Engineering Services Department, will be required prior to Final and Acceptance Inspections. Verification by the assigned Engineering Inspector of the setting of monuments deferred since approval of the Final Parcel Map, and certification and proof of payment for labor and materials, all by the Preparer of the Map, will be required prior to Final and Acceptance Inspections. Filing of Corner Records may be required. Submittal, approval, and recordation of a Certificate of Correction will be required if there are any changes in the implementation of Final Map instructions. Satisfactory resolution of all deferred monument issues will merit release of the Security Deposit assigned. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposit assigned to the Grading Permit. Please note that Building Permit final inspections are a separate event apart from any Engineering Permit final inspection and are not necessarily coincidental. Satisfactory conclusion of Acceptance Inspection and formal acceptance by the City Council and Cardiff Sanitation District Board of Directors is a prerequisite to a 75% reduction in the Security Deposit guaranteeing performance of public sewer improvements, and start of the mandatory one -year Warranty Period. The retention shall be held for the duration of the Warranty Period and will be released only after the satisfactory completion of the Warranty Inspection. The Warranty Inspection cannot be scheduled until after the expiration of the Warranty Period. This letter does not change subdivider or successor -in- interest obligations per the proposed Parcel Map. This letter is limited in scope. During the Building Permit process, you will need services and be subject to regulation from as follows: the Current Planning Division, Building Inspection Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, and Cardiff Sanitation District, all of the City of the Encinitas, and the City of Escondido, Olivenhain Municipal Water District, Encinitas Union School District and San Dieguito Union High School District, all separate public agencies. Please inquire at their respective counters. Additional engineering requirements will be forthcoming during the Building Permit process, including, but not necessarily limited to, coordination of the building site plan with the grading plan, resolution of any outstanding public improvement issues, and assessment and collection of sanitary sewer, traffic mitigation, and additional flood control fees. The latter two items are subject to substantial increases in the near future; payments at the current rates will be accepted if a building application has been formally submitted and the increase has not been adopted, all as of the date of payment. M M /jsg/98- 139.doc3 No connection to the new main will be allowed unless the subject property has annexed into the Cardiff Sanitation District, and the appropriate Wastewater Discharge Permit and Plumbing Permit have been issued. Your parcel, A.P.N. 264. 091.58, was annexed, effective October 27, 1999- Wastewater Discharge Permits are deferred until prior to issuance of a Building Permit. The Plumbing Permit will be within the scope of a Building Permit. Enclosed please find a copy of the Cardiff Sanitation District's policy regarding Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreements. You are hereby notified of the policy. If there should be a substantial delay in the start of your project, please request an update of this letter. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2780, or you may wish to visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center. Sincerely, pr �. Jeffrey S. Garami Engineering Technician Subdivision Engineering cc San Dieguito Engineering, Inc., Engineer of Work Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Todd Baumhach, Engineering Inspector Greg Caudill, Engineering Technician permlt/flle enc Requirements for Proof of Insurance Security Obligation Agreement 121 Policy re: Sewer Construction Reimbursement Agreements MM /jsg/98- 139.doc4 0aNN S -LY END WILDFLOWER DRIVE Permit No.s 6062GI, 6062II, & 6075GI Precosntruction Meeting May 4, 2000 9:00 a.m. Owner: Roy Oakley (949) 2504080 Engineer: San Dieguito Engineering (760) 753 -5525 Grading Contractor: G.F. Whillock (760) 599 -6800 Soils: No, Co. Compaction Eng,Inc. (760) 480 -1116 Drainage Structures: Civil Constructors (619) 596 -3270 Eng. Inspector: Todd Baumbach (760) 633 -2796 AZ ( q4y) Zi 94 - 7Z9 C6 I A ) TZ>E C &i9) 51g - o v -7 J GL/fioi�/U %Aedrr,¢,,/ C wG� Gey- s ��L,UKRO - CELL office hours: 7 -8:00 a.m. & 3-4:00 p.m. Hours of operations. (NOISE ORDINANCE). 7:00 am. to 5:30 p.m. No work on Sat., Sun. or City recognized holidays. 2. Preconstruction meetings shall also be required for sewer improvements. Water and joint trench will hold their own meetings. 3. Recommendations in the Preliminary Soils Report shall be followed. Any deviations that the Geotechnical Engineer feels will compromise the project shall be brought to the inspector's attention. 4. Erosion control. October 15th to April 15th. Slopes may be landscaped and irrigated in lieu of hydroseeding. Emergency contact person and phone number. 6. Exporting 1170 C.Y. + / -. Before exporting, contact Raymond Guarnes @ 633- 2704 to establish and approved haul route. Contact Inspector 24 hours in advance of hauling. 7. Any changes or revisions must be cleared through the Engineering Dept. beforehand. 8. No work outside the work area. (i.e. remainder parcel) preconwd.doc Submittals required prior to starting construction: a) Class II Base b) Letter from No. County Compaction Eng., Inc. C) Certification of the D -Load on the RCP. d) Construction schedule showing sequence of phasing. 10. An R -Value test shall be required to determine the actual road section. 11. It is the contractor's responsibility of notifying the inspector 24 hours in advance prior to inspection. Calls after 4:00pm shall be considered same day inspection requests. Work performed without inspection is subject to removal. 12. Rough Grading sign -off: (See attached) 13. Final grading sign -off: a) As- builts. b) As- graded certification letter. C) Slopes 90% covered with vegetation. d) Final walk through/punchlist. preconwd.doc ' ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL OF GRADING PERMIT The following requirements are the minimum allowable prior to rough grading approval. 1. All grading operations required to obtain the elevations shown on the grading plan are complete and pad elevations are within 0.1 ft. Provide geotechnical report certifying the grading has been performed in accordance with the soils report and the compaction test results shall be submitted to the City. All retaining walls shown on the approved grading plans also require a letter of Certification, for each wall shown, from the geotechnical engineer. 2. All drainage systems, public and private, surface and subsurface, have been installed and completed per the grading plan, inspected and approved by the inspector. Yard drain inlets need not be installed at this point for rough grading approval. 3. All sewer systems shall be installed and accepted by City Inspector and the appropriate District. 4. All water systems, including fire protection systems, are to be installed and accepted by the appropriate District and the City as complete, including pressure testing, bacteria testing and chlorinating. 5. Curb and gutter, sidewalk grades are completed and R value tests have been taken. Letter of certification from the Engineer certifying line and grade are required. Compaction report from the geotechnical engineer is also required. 6. All fire hydrants are to be installed, tested, inspected and accepted by the Fire Department. 7. All roads are to be installed, except for the final lift of paving. 8. All dry utilities shall be installed, inspected and approved by the appropriate agency. All other safety and health issues as required by the City to assure a safe and hazard free environment. These items are to be submitted to the City Inspector along with a written request for rough grading approval. The Inspector will the approve or disapprove and forward to the Engineering Department. NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. May 11, 2000 Project No. CE -6104 Roy Oakley 2171 Pavillion Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Subject: Change of Soils Engineer Oakley Subdivision City of Encinitas Tract TPM 98 -139 Wildflower Drive Encinitas, California References: 1.) "Geotechnical Investigation" prepared by Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., dated May 24, 1989 2.) "Rippability Analysis ", Deep Sewer Trench prepared by Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., dated May 21, 1990 3.) "Update Report" prepared by Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., dated May 20, 1999 4.) "Grading Plan" prepared by San Dieguito Engineering, Inc., approved April 3, 2000 Dear Mr. Oakley: Per the City of Encinitas request, we respectfully submit the following information regarding the change of Soils Engineer. We, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC., have reviewed the above referenced project plans and soils reports. Subsequent to our review, we concur with findings, conclusions, and recommendations and are satisfied with the reports. We assume all responsibility within our purview as of May 8, 2000. We were contracted to provide soil testing and inspection services, to certify compliance with current standard practices regarding earthwork construction. P. O. BOX 302002 * ESCONDIDO, CA 92030 * (760)480 -1116 FAX (760)741 -6568 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6104 Page 2 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President RKA:paj cc: (3) submitted 'Z',,OFESS /ph uQ14. Op R FR? 4l c No. 713 z m L 9130101 m zo Dale R. Creotechnical EnOffeer 000713 SUBMITTAL PROJECT: OAKLEY - WILDFLOWER CONTRACTOR: CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS CORP P.O. BOX 6 EL CAJON, CA 92022 -0006 DISTRICT: CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 PREPARED BY: JOHN MEYERS MARDEN SUSCO, LLC 1560 W. LINDA VISTA DR. SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 (619) 744 -5600 EXT. 123 TABLE OF CONTENTS WILDFLOWER A) PACIFIC WESTERN PIPE (PW PIPE) B) GPK PRODUCTS, INC. C) T. CHRISTY ENTERPRISES ki \I- PWRpe a 0,7T,�?e♦ rTl ' f.- I I]: i. 1 iflexible.P.WPipe PVC pipelwill i -'- �Llas !kLeirikItreiv ix , a 0,7T,�?e♦ rTl ' f.- I I]: PWPipe's integral -bell gasketed Chemically inert PWPipe PVC pipe 10 joint seals your system so nothing is immune to sewer gases and .300 gets in -or out. hydrogen sulfide attack. 12 No other sewer pipe system outper- Smooth, non - wetting interior walls .360 forms PWPipe's at keeping sewage make PWPipe sewer pipe highly resis- 15 in and ground water out. Our factory tant to abrasion from waste or slurries. .437 installed rubber gaskets (see Figure 1) Erosion, pitting and tuberculation are 18 ensure that joints maintain their virtually eliminated. and corrosive soil Figure 1. PWPipe TwinSeal Gasket integrity even when subjected to conditions have no effect. You can 21 deflection and bending. Root pene- bury this pipe anywhere and know it den ,s an,n,egral pail tration and ground water pollution are will last. lit the pipe lengih virtually eliminated. 22.480 .711 3658 Plus, you'll save money inserhgnline You can bury PWPipe PVC throughout its long life. Nominal Pipe Size (inches) shallow -or deep -and know Base Inside Diameter (inches) Minimum Wall Thickness (inches) it won't crack. You'll typically save time and use \ 4.215 fewer people when you install PVC. .1 PWPipe sewer pipe is strong enough Compared to other pipe materials, it's 6 to be buried fifty feet underground. light in weight (see Table 1) and han- .241 and flexible enough to eliminate shear dles easily in lengths of up to 20 feet. 8 or beam failures. The pipe's great flex- 7090" .323 ibility transfers much of the load to the Acceptances- PWPipe sewer pipe in 10 surrounding earth. In effect, this PVC s I sizes 4' through 15' is IAPMO "' 40 pipe /soil system is one of the listed and accepted 12 strongest in use today. most rural and municipal spigot ends are supplied 1230 utility districts. ;µ r from wnn he +el 15.300 13.575 actof installed rubber gasket provides a tight flexible seal Meets requirements Table 1A SDR 35 Pipe Dimensions and Weights -. of ASTM F 477 Gaskel drawn above supplied for reference purposes airy Nominal Average Base Minimum Approx. Wt. Approx. Pipe Outside Inside Wall 20' Pieces 13'4 Size Diameter Diameter Thickness (lbs/100 ft) (I oft) (inches) (inches) (inches) -es (inches) �� 4l 4.275 3.890 .120 105 107 6 6.275 5.742 180 234 289 10 10.500 9.563 .300 664 6r7 12 12.500 11.361 .360 933 2 15 15300 13.898 .437 1387 1 15 18 18.701 16.976 .536 2079 2121 21 22.047 20.004 .632 2890 J48 24 24.803 22.480 .711 3658 3 31 Table 1 B. SDR 26 Pipe Dimensions and Weights Nominal Pipe Size (inches) Average Outsid Diameter (inches) Base Inside Diameter (inches) Minimum Wall Thickness (inches) Approx. Wt. 20' Pieces (Ibs/ Ap ox. Wt. 'Pieces (lb 1100 ft) 4 4.215 .801 .1 139 140 6 6.275 5.61 .241 309 313 8 8.400 7090" .323 553 560 10 10.500 9.342 40 877 879 12 12. 11.102 .481 1230 1247 15 15.300 13.575 .588 1862 1898 2 In the ground. PWPipe PVC's smooth walls provide superior flow character- istics for minimum energy loss from friction. Often, you can use flatter slopes or smaller diameter pipe. When cleaning becomes necessary. all you'll usually need is a hydraulic jet. You can also use standard —or auger type—commercial cleaning and rodding equipment to clean PWPipe sewer pipe. Most equipment manufac- turers suggest that cleaning PVC lines is no different from cleaning other types of pipe lines. You're assured of premium quality when you buy from PWPipe. All our pipe is manufactured with the finest raw materials in one of six West Coast plants. Every manufacturing step is regulated by rigid quality control under the supervision of skilled technicians. Our finished products are subjected to numerous ASTM tests, including impact, flattening, acetone immersion, visual inspection, and joint tightness. TwinSeal Sewer Pipe Isn't just PVC ... it's PWPipe. For long -term service without hidden defects, PWPipe's Twin -Seal PVC sewer pipe outperforms all other materials. Joints are tested in our laboratory under both pressure and vacuum to assure quality in the gasket and the fit. As required by ASTM, the tests are performed with the pipe joint bent axially and with the spigot end deflected, simulating adverse field conditions. Infiltration is limited to 50 gal /inch diameter /mile /day —or less —in even the wettest conditions. These nex. Iijur anL -s 'Nii+: aelp you design your PWPipe sewer system: Surface or Live Loads: Surface loads effect of H2O live loads at various significant at depths of 4 feet or must be considered when designing depths of cover. From this chart you greater. Live loads are also shown in "P a piping system. Figure 2 shows the see that highway live loads are not Table 2. W W o' u 0 x u w x 500 1000 ism 2000 VERTICAL SOIL PRESSURE ipsg Flow Factors: Because of the supe- rior flow characteristics of PVC pipe, economies can sometimes be realized through use of smaller diameter pipe or shallower grades. Refer to Table 3 for minimum slopes. Structural Capacity: PWPipe sewer pipe is a flexible conduit that takes ad- vantage of the support capacity of the surrounding earth by transferring a major portion of the load directly to it. Deflection of the pipe varies with class and density of soil, amount of com- paction, depth of burial, and live load. Refer to Table 4 for descriptions of material classifications. See Table 5 for degree of compaction, and Table 6 for depth of burial. E Height I Live Load Transferred to Pipe,IE /in° Height Live Load Transferred to Pipe, Ih/Ina Cover (R) Highway Railway H2O' E80' Airport 1 Cover FHIghway 00 H20' Railway E007 Airport ' 1 12.50 14 4.17 3.06 2 5.56 26.39 13.14 16 3.4 7 2 29 3 4.17 23.61 12.28 18 218 1.91 4 2.78 18.40 11.27 20 2.08 1 53 5 1.74 16.67 10.09 22 1.91 1.14 6 1.39 15.63 8.79 24 1.74 105 7 1.22 12.15 7.85 26 1.39 ' 8 0.69 11.11 6.93 28 1.04 ' 10 7.64 6.09 30 0.69 ' 12 5.56 4.76 35 ' Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays.. Liquid limit greater than 50 %. V 40 ' Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity. Liquid limit 50% or less. Simulates 20 ton buck . impact Organic clays of medium to high plasticity. Liquid limit greater than 50 %. Simulates 80.0001G1x railway load . impact 180.000 Ibs a" tandem gear assembly 26 inch spacing txtween ores and 66 inch center lo- center spacing between lore and a0 hies under a rgid pevemem 12 inches thick .impact •Negl,g,ble lave bad influence Tibh 3:;Ninimutn k V = 2 FT /SEC SDR 35 ASTM D 3034 AND F 679 PVC Sewer V 10 12 15 18 21 24 0.410 0.241 0.163 0.121 0.096 0.073 0.056 0.045 0.038 n = 0.009 101 110 245 439 685 970 1460 2170 3020 3820 Soli Soil sole Type Description of Material Classification Manufactured angular, granular material,' /. to llh inches (6 to 40mm) size, including materials having regional significance such as crushed stone or rock, broken coral, crushed slag, cinders, or crushed shells. II' GIN Well - graded gravels and gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines. Clean. GP Poorly graded gravels and gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines. Clean. SW Well - graded sands and gravelly sands, little or no fines. Clean. SP Poorly graded sands and gravelly sands, little or no fines. Clean. III' GM Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures. GC Clayey gravels, gravel- sand -clay mixtures. SM Silty sands, sand -silt mixtures. SC Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures. IV ML Inorganic silts, very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands. Liquid limit 50% or less. CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silly clays, lean clays. Liquid limit 50% or less. MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sands or silts, elastic silts. Liquid limit greater than 50 %. CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays.. Liquid limit greater than 50 %. V OIL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity. Liquid limit 50% or less. OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity. Liquid limit greater than 50 %. PT Peal, muck and other highly organic soils. q ssa Table S. Degree of Compaction This guide approximates degree of rcompaction from embedment class and method of placement information. Compaction values are in percent of standard Proctor density and relative densities are shown in parentheses. r Nofc This table serves as an approximate guide dekmng average Proctor densities stained Trough various melhdds of son Consolldahoh to dafermt classes of soil The table is intended to pronde guidance and is not recommended for design use Actual design values should be developed by the engineer for specific soils at specific moisture contents References: Figure 4 and Tables 2,3.5,6,7 and 9 are from HANDBOOK OF PVC PIPE, DESIGN AND CON- STRUCTION, by Uni -Bell PVC Pipe Association. Other figures and tables per PWPipe. InstaMMon TMble , MAXIMUM CLASS OF EMBEDMENT I II MODULUSOF MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Manufactured SandBGrml Granular SOILREACTION, COVER CLASS Soils -Clean Materials E' (pal) (10 Optimum moisture content range 9 -t2 3000 50' limit %of dry welght 85-85 2000 50' Soil Consolidation Method %of Proctor (or Relative) Density Range Compact by power tamper 95 -100 95 -100 g5 -100 90 -100 orrammer (75 -100) (80 -100) 1000 50' Density by portable 80-95 80-95 80-95 75 -90 vibrators (60 -75) (60.80) IV 85.85 Consolidate by satu rat ion 80 -95 80 -95 75 -85 200 17 (60 -75) (60-80) 50 9 Hand place 60 -80 (40 -60) Handtamp 60 -80 (50 -60) 60 -80 60 -75 Dump 60 -80 (40 -60) 60 -80 (50 -60) 60-80 60-75 PIPE ZONE CONDITION RECOMMENDED I Percent of Proctor density In accordance with AASNTO T99 d ASTM 0 699 2 Table is applmable only when Ivien.m Pipe Stiffness is ae Iblman 3 At recrosrialde0 maximum heights of cover defined . dedectvons wnl not exceed 7 % when proper Installation procedures are used im 'Maxum he,gnl of cover recommendations are due to current lack of wit modulus (E ') data In le heghls ova 50 feel Actual Installations In excess of 50 feet are possible and have been successfully cdnpleted PWPipe sewer pipe should be For further information, contact installed in straight alignment at PWPipe and ask for the Longitudinal the joints. Minor curvature should be Bending Technical Bulletin. achieved by bending the pipe lengths. Refer to Table 7. T ...� wa -f :. e► .�: Diameter ; a� 6 n J ) 10 12 15 r V Minimum 56 84 112 140 167 204 radius (It) MAXIMUM EMBEDMENT %OFPROCTOR MODULUSOF HEIGHT OF DENSITY SOILREACTION, COVER CLASS RANGE E' (pal) (10 1 ✓- 3000 50' II 85-85 2000 50' 75.85 1000 50' 65.75 200 17 III 85-95 1000 50' 75-85 400 28 r 65.75 100 12 IV 85.85 400 28 75 -85 200 17 65-75 50 9 I Percent of Proctor density In accordance with AASNTO T99 d ASTM 0 699 2 Table is applmable only when Ivien.m Pipe Stiffness is ae Iblman 3 At recrosrialde0 maximum heights of cover defined . dedectvons wnl not exceed 7 % when proper Installation procedures are used im 'Maxum he,gnl of cover recommendations are due to current lack of wit modulus (E ') data In le heghls ova 50 feel Actual Installations In excess of 50 feet are possible and have been successfully cdnpleted PWPipe sewer pipe should be For further information, contact installed in straight alignment at PWPipe and ask for the Longitudinal the joints. Minor curvature should be Bending Technical Bulletin. achieved by bending the pipe lengths. Refer to Table 7. T ...� wa -f :. e► .�: Diameter ; a� 6 n J ) 10 12 15 r V Minimum 56 84 112 140 167 204 radius (It) PWPipe sewer pipe will withstand vertical deflection in excess of 30% without failure. A safety factor of 4:1 is applied to this value resulting in a 7.5% maximum long -term deflection recommendation. At this level of deflection, joints remain tight, service connections are easily made, and cleaning is not impaired. This ability to deflect without sacrificing perfor- mance is a major factor in allowing PWPipe sewer pipe to support earth and live loads better than more rigid conduits. Deflection can be accurately pre- dicted from Table 8. From this table, it is apparent that soil density in the pipe zone is the most important factor in supporting the pipe. This data was developed from laboratory tests and direct field measurements. I Tesl d ata ocicates no length d pipe Inslalletl under Cafdilidr6 SpeGM1etl will deflect mIXe than Is mGlc.edl the pqR will deflect less than Ine arhounl indicated it Sfy Cifed densely is oCtamec 2 Emhecoenl nNlenal cWs4M1calrons areas par ASTM D 2321. Underground Installation of ThernppNshc Pepe for Sewers and Other Gtamly -Fl. AypeecalWns 3 Listed deflections are those caused by sal loading only and do nor include nitral our of roundness. etc. 4 Dald obtained I'm Utah Slate Un.versey reps, Depth of Burial PWPipe SDR 35 PVC sewer pipe is strong enough to withstand burial depths of 50 feet. And it can handle highway loads with as little as one foot of cover. See the PWPipe Technical Bulletins "Depth of Burial for PVC Pipe ", "PVC Sewer Pipe Burial Depth Chart" and "PVC Pipe Trench Con- struction" for more details. Suggested Specification PVC gravity sewer pipe and fittings shall conform to ASTM D 3034 for diameters from 4' -15', and ASTM F 679 for 18' -24', with integral -bell gasketed joints. Rubber gaskets shall be factory installed and conform to ASTM F 477. Pipe joints shall conform to ASTM D 3212. Pipe shall be made of PVC plastic having a cell classification of 12454 -B or 12364 -B as defined in ASTM D 1784 and shall have SDR of 35 and minimum pipe stiffness of 46 PSI according to ASTM D 2412. Pipe shall be installed in compliance with ASTM D 2321. Bedding material shall provide adequate and uniform support under the pipe. IN R 5. , I . ASTM EMBEDMENT DENSITY HEIGHT OF COVER (FEET) MATERIAL (PROCTOR) CLASSIFICATION AASHTO T 99 1 3 5 8 10 12 1 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Manufactured Granular CLASS I Angular 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1A 1.5 1.6 Clean Sand 90% 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 & Gravel CLASS II 80% 0.1 0.9 1.4 2.3 3.2 3.6 4.1 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.4 7.3 Not recommended 90% 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1#1.6.7, 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.3 Sand & Gravel �% 0.1 0.7 0.9 1.7 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.5 35.2 5.6 6.0 6.5 with Fines CLASS III 75% 0.3 1.1 1.8 2.9 3.8 4.5 5.5 6.8 ot ecommended 65% 0.6 1.3 2.4 3.6 4.7 5.5 6.8 85% 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.7 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.9 4.3 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.0 6.5 sin a 75% 0.4 1.3 2.3 3.3 6.5 Clay CLASS IV Not recommended Ek 65% 0.8 1.3 2.4 3.6 I Tesl d ata ocicates no length d pipe Inslalletl under Cafdilidr6 SpeGM1etl will deflect mIXe than Is mGlc.edl the pqR will deflect less than Ine arhounl indicated it Sfy Cifed densely is oCtamec 2 Emhecoenl nNlenal cWs4M1calrons areas par ASTM D 2321. Underground Installation of ThernppNshc Pepe for Sewers and Other Gtamly -Fl. AypeecalWns 3 Listed deflections are those caused by sal loading only and do nor include nitral our of roundness. etc. 4 Dald obtained I'm Utah Slate Un.versey reps, Depth of Burial PWPipe SDR 35 PVC sewer pipe is strong enough to withstand burial depths of 50 feet. And it can handle highway loads with as little as one foot of cover. See the PWPipe Technical Bulletins "Depth of Burial for PVC Pipe ", "PVC Sewer Pipe Burial Depth Chart" and "PVC Pipe Trench Con- struction" for more details. Suggested Specification PVC gravity sewer pipe and fittings shall conform to ASTM D 3034 for diameters from 4' -15', and ASTM F 679 for 18' -24', with integral -bell gasketed joints. Rubber gaskets shall be factory installed and conform to ASTM F 477. Pipe joints shall conform to ASTM D 3212. Pipe shall be made of PVC plastic having a cell classification of 12454 -B or 12364 -B as defined in ASTM D 1784 and shall have SDR of 35 and minimum pipe stiffness of 46 PSI according to ASTM D 2412. Pipe shall be installed in compliance with ASTM D 2321. Bedding material shall provide adequate and uniform support under the pipe. IN The values in Table 8 represent maxi- mum long -term deflection. Figure 3 shows that deflection stabilizes at 100 to 1000 hours, depending on soil den- sity. Refer to Figure 4 for an example of permanent deflection as a function of traffic. The performance of PVC sewer pipe exposed to dynamic wheel loadings while buried at shallow burial depths has been evaluated at the Geotechni- cal Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Figure 4 is typical of the results obtained from the evaluation. It was concluded that SDR 35 PVC pipe performed very well under a range of loadings representa- tive of highway and light to medium aircraft traffic. A minimum cover height of 12 inches Is recom- mended for SDR 35 PVC pipe sub- jected to highway loads of up to 18 kip axle. Under light to medium air- craft loads of up to 320,000 pounds gross weight, a minimum burial depth of 2 feet is recommended. Special attention should be given to the selection, placement and com- paction of backfill material in shallow burial applications. Care in installation can prevent injurious cracking of the road surface. Figure 3. Time Deflection Curves 40 35 E g 30 It 25 20 l5 0 zoo 400 600 600 100o 1200 two Time in Hour Detlecnon as a lun.wn of time for PVC MPe Euneo in an em0ankment Source Ulan Slate Unnend, 1600 '600 Figure 4. Permanent Dermillon of 1Za PVC Pipe As a Funetbn of Trafflo (CTT) 2 0 2 I .4 0 U w o g a U a i e W U M it 10 1 SOURCE FAA -RD -l9 au 7 Testing an Installed PVC Pipe System Following the installation of a pipeline, an infiltration, exfiltration, or air pres- sure test should be made on each section of pipe between manholes. The project engineer should designate the type of test to be performed and provide instructions as to how it shall be carried out. Air Testing: Where possible, low - pressure air testing is recommended. Test pressures must not exceed 9 psi. The minimum time for air in the test section to drop from 3.5 to 3.0 PSIG shall not be less than indicated in Table 9. Complete air test specifica- tions are contained in Uni -Bell pam- phlet Uni -B -6, available from PWPipe or Uni -Bell. Infiltration and Exfiitration Test: The maximum allowable infiltration or exfiltration shall not exceed 50 gallons per inch diameter of pipe, per mile of Dioeline. Der day. WARNING: Do not use PVC pipe for pressurized air systems. Injury or death may result due to the catastrophic nature of pipe failure should failure occur. Rapid ex- pansion of compressed air could propel shards of plastic throughout the area. 1 Pipe Diam. (in) redXT 2... - 3.... Minimum Length for Time Min. Time (mm:sec) (a) C c Time for Longer Length (aec) Specification Time for Length (L) Shown (minmec) 100 It 150 It 200 it 2501t 300 It 350 It 400 ft 450 ft 4 1:53 597 .190L 1:53 1:53 1:53 1:53 1:53 1:53 1:53 1:53 2:50 398 .4271 2:50 250 2:50 2:50 2:50 2:50 2:51 3:12 ,6 f 8) 3:47 298 .760L 3:47 3:47 3:47 3:47 3:48 428 5:04 5:42 10 4:43 239 1.187L 4:43 4:43 4:43 4:57 5:56 6:55 7:54 8:54 12 5:40 199 1.709L 5:40 5:40 5:42 7:08 8:33 9:59 11:24 12.50 15 7:05 159 2.671 L 7:05 7:05 8:54 11:08 13:21 15:35 17:48 20:02 18 8:30 133 3.846L 8:30 9:37 12:49 16:01 19:14 22:26 25:38 28:51 21 9:55 114 5.2351- 9:55 13:05 17:27 21:49 26:11 30:32 34:54 39:16 24 1 11:20 99 1 6.837E 1 11:24 1 17:57 1 22:48 1 28:30 1 34:11 1 39:53 1 45:35 1 51:17 'Smdcaam lime re hiwexi for a 0 5 PSIG pressure pop for size ar fengm of ppe a o,caleff for 0=0 0015 About PWPipe Pacific Western Extruded Plastics Company is the nation's third largest producer of PVC Pipe for potable water, sewer, irrigation, plumbing, and electrical markets. PWPipe is sold throughout Western North America and to worldwide export markets. To meet your needs, PWPipe specifi- cations and warranties are continually updated. If the printed date on this lit- erature is more than 12 months old, please contact PWPipe for any changes that may have occurred. PWPipe is a member of the Uni -Bell PVC Pipe Association. Pacific Western Extruded Plastics Company Po sox 10049. Eugene, OR 97440 / Phone(541)343 -02001 FAX 15411686 -9247 1 www pwpfce corn 1- ,0G ndfne PWim"I yraare ,Bgisfe•cl vatlN ,i nl PdU1K WesfMn E•nWiwi Plastics CCn+panv L,IM in USA • Reorue, W MN M1F. Aon, ID97 t� V 1` GPK L' PRODUCTS, INC. T ! Ma 'S .1_!: �. is :•.1'.j, rv' ��` ; iti.nbl L' 1 )r Nh1,t �, '� HIV. •. r!'^ :,t I .l r• • J�I .' yyyyyy ��,��, A1�i ' '1l rl.• GPK L' PRODUCTS, INC. GPK PRODUCTS INC. THE NUMBER ONE CHOICE IN PVC SEWER & DRAINAGE FITTINGS Over the years, GPK's reputation has been built on fulfilling the needs of contractors and engineers. No one meets the competitive challenges of today's PVC fitting market like GPK Products. To further assure you of our credibility, GPK Products has 17 different national, state and regional listings in the United States and Canada. As America's number one producer of PVC fittings, GPK has developed an extensive warehousing system to providing quick and reliable service to our customers. We intend to take care of your fittings needs. OUR COMPLETE LINE ;tt RUNS INTO THE �� THOUSANDS !J J When GPK Products, Inc. produced it's first i fittings in 1972, the product line consisted of only solvent weld SDR -35 sewer fittings in 4 through 12 inch sizes. That line has since been expanded to include over 4100 different cataloged fittings in sizes through 48 inches in diameter in nearly pry configuration for nearly every application. It you need it, GPK can make it! Below, Fabricated Solvent Weld Fittings. From left to right: 816 Drop Manhole Cross; 10x6 Tee; 12" Wye; 10x90 r✓ Above, Fabricated gasketed Fittings. Clockwise from fop left corner. 12x6 Doublewye, 12x6 T- Y,- 15" Cap; 8x22 112 SxG: 12" Repair Coupling @ SDR -35 GASKETED, SOLVENT, FABRICATED, MOLDED �1 Produced in 4 through 27 inch diameters in both solvent weld and gasketed, GPK's fittings are manufactured to ASTM standards D 3034, F 679 and F 1336. GPK injection molds over 100 different fittings in the 4 through 12 inch size range and can fabricate most of the same fittings if requested. GPK's gasketed fittings utilize gaskets produced from rubber meeting the requirements of ASTM F 477. These gaskets are manufactured to tight tolerances to assure superior watertight performance under the most severe field conditions. Below , Molded Gaskeled Fillings .Clockwise from back right: 4x45 SxG; 090 ; 6x4 Reducer SxG. 8x4 Saddle Wye; 8" Sanded Manhole Adapter; 8x6 T- Y, 6" Cap AlOr .roy /J 4/ Above, Molded Solvent Weld Fittings. Clockwise from center. 6x45: 6" Plug; FIPT Sewer x Spigot Adapter: 4" Wye: 4" MIPT Plug: 46 Increaser Right, Fabricated Air Duct Fittings. From left to right: 4xl2x6 Register Boot: 2 114 x 12 Register Saddle: 6x 10 Increaser SpR- Heavy Wall Gaske Sewer Fittings. Sizes range from 4 tt� oug 18 inch diameters. Above, Gasketed Heavy Wall Sewer Fittings. Clockwise from back left: 15x6 Tee; 12x6 Wye: 12" Repair Coupling FITTO 9 GPK's line of Air D fittings are made from pipe with outside \6t that comply with ASTM D 3034 s cific These fittings are produced in si s froough 15 inches in diameter. Air Ituct fittings can also be produced to fit IPS diameter pipe. i �r SDR 35 (PS46) FITTING SPECIFICATIONS 1.0 GPK PVC Sewer Fittings shall be manufactured In accordance with either ASiM D 3034, F 1336 or F 679. The PVC material shall have a minimum cell classiflcation of 12454-8,12454-C or 12364-C as defined In ASTM D 1784. 2.0 The purpose of GPK in-Me fittings Is to convey municipal sanitary and Industrial wastes, storm water run -off and many other related applcations. They are designed to be used in gravity flow and low pressure applications not to exceed 10.8 psi. 3.0 Infection Molded FlTtings are produced In saes 40 through 8' diameter. Fabricated Fittings ore- produced In sizes X through 27" diameter. A fabricated fitting is considered any fitting made from pipe or c combination of pipe and molded components. 4.0 Chemical Resistance. GPK fittings resist attack from certain alcohols, alkalies, salt solutions, acids and other types of chemicals. Refer to chemical resistance chart. 5.0 Marking. GPK fittings shall be marked with applicable size. 'PVC', company name or logo. PSM and the ASTM spec ficatlon number (D 3034. F 1336 or F 679). The fittings and /or packaging shall include the manufacturers date and shift code. 6.0 Testing. A test after Installation of either low pressure air (Unl -&6) or a water infittrotion- exfiltr rhon test is recommended. 7.0 Deflectlon Test. The maximum allowable pipe fitting deflection should be 7 1/2A of base ID as shown in Table XI.I of D 3034, 8.0 SackNling and Tamping. Backfilling should follow closely after assembly of pipe cnd fittings. 8.1 Backfiiflng with proper material is important to achieve desired density in hounching area which enables pipe. fitting and soil to work together to meet designed load requirements. This eliminates excess deflection and shear breaks due to heavy boos. Approved material shall be used property, compacted continuously above and around the pipe and fittings as well as between the fitting and trench wall. A cushion of approved material up to a minimum of 12' over the fittings and between the trench walls shall be applied in accordance with the engineers' speciflcations. 8.2 Tamping. This shall be done by hand tomping of the embedment material between the trench wall of the service line fitting and riser connection. Tamping ccn also be done by mechanical tampers or by using water to consolidate the embedment material. Extreme unstable ground conditions may require wider trenches to enable you to compact a larger area around the pipe and fittings to the density consistent of the original ground surface conditions. 9.0 Service Unes. Normally, service lines from the property fine to the collection sewer should be a minimum depth of 3 feet at the property line and should be laid in straight alignment and uniform slope of not less than 114" per toot for 4' nominal pipe and 1 /8' per foot for 6' pipe. Where correction sewers are deeper than 7 feet a vertical standpipe of stock is perrT�itted. Deep sewer chimney and risers necessitate extreme care during backfilling. Where surface loading is anticipated the final backfill must be -compacted to a density compatible with those surface loods to be encountered. 9.1 Backfllling around pipe service laterals on slope. Extra attention should be given an slopes to prevent the newly backfilled trench from becoming a "French Drain.' Before bockfilling completely there is a tendency for ground and surface water to follow the direction of the looser soil. This flow may wash out soil from under or cround pipe and branch line fittings, reducing or eliminating the support needed- To avoid this problem the backfilling should be of greater compaction. Tamping should be done in 4• layers and continued in this manner all the way up to ground or surface line of the trench. Concrete collars or other concrete poured around the fitting to stabilize unwonted movement is recommended to prevent water from undercutting the underside of the pipe i and fittings. SUMMARY: Due to various ground conditions and different situations. installation techniques vary widely. We warranty our products to be free of manufacturer's defects. We will not replace the products that are installed or used incorrectly. The design of the systems that our product is used in is a factor that cannot be overlooked. GPK FITTING SUBMITTAL SHEET Intro: GPK manufactures PVC sewer fittings in accordance with either ASTM D 3034, F 1336 or F 679 to be used in gravity flaw or low pressure applications. Injection molded fittings are produced in sties f 4' through 8' diameter. Fabricated fittings are produced in sizes 4' through 27 diameter. Material: Fabricated fittings are manufactured from PVC pipe and molded components meeting all the requirements of ether ASTM D 3034, F 1336 and F 679 for workmanship, extrusion quality, stiffness, Impact resistance, dimensions and structural performance. Extruded pipe components are made from PVC material with a minimum cell classification -of 12454 -8, 12454 -C or 12364-C as defined in ASTM D 1784. Injection molded fittings are made from PVC material with c minimum cell classification of 12454-6, 12454-C or 13343 -C as defined in ASTM D 1784. Extrusion Quality: Extruded components are tested in accordance with and meet all requirements of ASTM D 2152 for property fused PVC. Impact Resistance: Extruded components are tested in accordance with ASTM D 2444 using a 20 Ib, Tup A and a Flat Plate Holder B. The strength shall equal or exceed the values shown below: 4'- 5' 150 Ft-Lbs 6'- 8' 210 Ft -Lbs 10'- 27' 220 Ft -Lbs Impact Resistance: Injection molded fittings are tested in accordance with ASTM D 2444 using a 20 lb. Tup A and a Flat Plate Holder B. The strength shall equal or exceed the values shown below: 4' 50 Ft -Lbs 6' - 8' 75 Ft -Lbs Pipe Stiffness: Extruded components are tested in accordance with ASTM D 2421. The stiffness equals or (. exceeds the requirements of ASTM D 3034 and F 679 of 46 psi. Pipe Flattening: Extruded components are flattened as described in ASTM D 3034 and F 679 until the distance between the plates is 40% of the outside diameter of the pipe. There shall be no splitting, cracking or breaking. Pressure /Pressure Deflection: Gosketed joints are tested In accordance with ASTM D 3212. Pressure: 10 minutes @ 10.8 psi + 10 minutes deflected @ 10.8 psi. Vacuum: 10 minutes @ 22' Hg + 10 minutes deflected @ 22' Hg. Branch Bending: The chemically fused areas around the branches of tee, wye and tee -wye fittings are tested to ASTM F 1336 to verify their strength and integrity. Riser Load: Tee and tee -wye fittings shall withstand a riser load of ct least (100' TY 'OD) pounds. No cracking or splitting shall occur. Joining Methods: Chemically Fused Solvent Weld Joints Solvent cement is handled and tested in accordance with ASTM D 2564 and D 2855. The Lop Shear Strength shall equal or exceed 900 psi @ 72 hours. Heat Fusion Welded Joints (Butt Fusion Welds) Elostomeric Seals (Gaskets) Must meet all requirements of ASTM F 477 and D 3212. Saddles: Injection molded saddle tees and saddle wyes shall have skirts with a minimum of 80 square inches surface area which can be bonded to pipe. Fabricated saddle tees and saddle wyes shall have skirts with a minimum of 160 square inches surface area which can be bonded to pipe. — GPK does not recommend gasket skirts where air tests are required. 7 PSM SOCKET DIMENSIONS SIZE SDR 35 SOLVENT WELD SDR 35 GASKETED AIR DUCT SOLVENT WELD SD OD SD OD C SD OD 4" MOLDED A \ 1.80 4.60 2.29 5.00 1.75 4" 6" Increaser 4" MOLDED B 2.87 4.60 2.62 5.00 2.06 4" FABRICATED 1.75 4.50' 2.75 .10 1.93 5" FABRICATED .00 6.00 3.62 6.87 2.37 a" MOLDED A 3. f/80 3.09 7.10 2.53 ' 6" MOLDED B 3.1 6.80 4.00 7.10 3.44 6" FABRICATED 3.00 6.70 3.75 7.42 2.28 3.00 6.50 8" MOLDED 4.00 9.04 3.75 9.46 3.00 8" FABRICATED 4.00 8.95 TTr 9.85 4,00 8.80 10" FABRICATED 5.00 / 11.12 5.00 12.10 3.22 5.00 i 10.90 12" FABRICATED 6.00. 13.30 5.00 14.15 3.25 6.00 13.00 15" FABRICATED 7.50 .30 5.25 17.50 3.33 7.50 15.90 18" FABRICATED 9x10 19. 5 7.00 20.60 4.50 21" FABRICATED 1b.50 23. 8.50 24.10 5.12 24" FABRICATED j 12.00 26.44 9.00 27.20 5.50 27" FABRICATED 13.50 29.75 10.00 30.90 6.00 S 4" MOLDED (A) � ;^_ -3 4" x 45 -'� 4 "x90 �4 =-fee 4" Wye "4= Tee -Wye -� 8" x 4" Wye &- xA.L.Tee 8:-x.43ae -_wve 4" MOLDED (B) .-** 4" Cap --� 4" Repair Coupling 4"*40+ncreeser 6" MOLDED IN b" MOLDED (B) 6`Wy a x 22 112 . 6" " x 45 8" x `Wye 6' 8. 6" 7pe 6" p 8" "Tee -Wye 6 "C ling 6" Rep r upling SD 6" 4" e OD 4" 6" Increaser NOTE: SOCKET DEPTHS FOR PSM SDR 26 HWS ARE THE SAME AS SDR 35 PSM. MOLDED GASKETED SOCKET FABRICATED GASKETED SOCKET OD D C t SD MOLDED SOLVENT WELD SOCKET FABRICATED SOLVENT WELD SOCKET SD SD OD OD 23 r 4" - 27" GASKETED SEWER FITTINGS Fittings are manufacted to ASTM D 3034 SDR 35, ASTM F 679 and ASTM F 1336 specifications. FULL REDUCING TEE SxGxG m® m ®�rry�®© �ml �� ` �R�,� I�� I�I�, REDUCING WYE )!�=mmm M® �� N®® r. r .. r.rr m rr r rr..�mm®' r• r ,. rr ��r.w m��m : rr � r rr.•®mmm I •• r .: 'rr �SL•�rJ rr • rr "m . rr.. mmIII ISf.1ls��l��G =mrljl r . .. Omw r rr:.11ll��llllI�l• m. �m��lm�� rr rr mm �rr � r rr::IIIIJ{JIII`>,•�•a®IIIIIIII� mmLL�r�7SLL�tr•�rr mwm� • rr I r r r.®®® rr uLL��i flA rr rr ■L mm I r r r•®®® rr �W r-f •rr rr rr ®' � r r r:m®m rr �LLr�YlIE '•r' �� ®{LIaLiG •rrr ®� rr I •rr �� rr III r r . •rr rr IIIIIII'� �� •rr ® rrr r r .�� ' �I, •rrr ��' r r r r > •rr �� •rr ®® rr r1 .:rr rr �� rr� . I�I 111111!1 .• . � r rrr•wIm ®_ M=mm mm � r. rrr.I�I�I�- I� r r :. :rr rr • rr ® r rr •�7CtiJ rr rr m I � •r • rr mm ® r rr mmmm wmm • rr . rr mm ® :,: mmm; �� .:, , :: .. rr •rrr ... • rr I r . .. u m ... ® r rr rr rrr r r m � r . •... rr m rrr r rr r.. r. r. . rr I,I 111,111 ®mw rrr rr m� • rr wl__®' ®_ ®�'' •rr ml� rr ro,m r. rrr. mmmm r. rrr. m • rr : rr m ® � •rr rr m •rrr ran = rrr: mm � r r .. rr • rr ® rr ® =Emmmm ® =r. m.,rr ®:.. ®. m � r rr1 ® r. ® r. ®r. ® rr w�r � � ® rr rr w� M® m ■ I • cm ® r mmm m is 493 'DENOTES MOLDED FITTING. ALL OTHERS ARE FABRICATED. i low IEW:m 4" - 27" GASKETED SEWER FITTINGS Fittings are manufactured to ASTM D 3034 SDR 35, ASTM F 679 and ASTM F 1336 specifications. ■■ mom ,` NO mommmm � .....® :.. 1. III ..,.m®® •./ .o' .1 =11, ®IIII�IIIII m IIIII� ...: Illll�i�illll�IIIIIiYlllll� I. 11 1®` : 1. ®- M I, 1mmm /1 ® . I, m : 11 ®- ® ,. m :.. m .1 �lmmmmm m � . ,1 .,. :.. I, m M ,1 .:,, , 11 ® /, m A lo a \ a� -- _�_II a? IIIII� Illlllm llllll� ®II� �� IIIIIIII�' 11 '�'' VIII :� ..,: .® 11 IIII�III� IIIIIIIIIII� 1..:��IIII�IIIII� III I, . 11 ® ®� III .. 11 : ,, .1 • ,1 -- -- ' j ' � - SxG IIIIII� 11..® I, Illll�i�i VIII :� : 111:®' ,1 ®:: ®: :� • 1111©.: mI�I®' m 1, ,mm7 • 11 ,1 m .., 1® 1 1 . 11 ., ® : 11 ®Illl:ll m ., ® • .. .. III' .. ®:., ,. , .. :.. ® • .. .. ... III :.. •11 ® '® • „ III /1 .,. :., �.. • .. 5D ADAPTERSxG ME=, �� III,. . .:., .1 1, • „ � ., :®1 11 � • ., all *DENOTES MOLDED FITTING. ALL OTHERS ARE FABRICATED. 493 IN ?`' IE 4" - 27" GASKETED SEWER FITTINGS Fittings are manufactured to ASTM D 3034 SDR 35, ASTM F 679 and ASTM F 1336 specifications. I- • MEMO REDUCER BUSHING ®� ® m, •• • . •• ®m�m 1=11111= •• ® • • •• III= =�,�' .! . •• ®1I •• . •• Ml • • „ .•• m •• .® •• t5® •• • •• MIMI ,.• pr •• •• MIS' •• INal ®m M . • ,I •• IllL M® MIM • •• �\® •• • • ; •• •.��® ®III •• • •• m • •• M • •.& .•• •• lLmm 1=1111f> •:•• •• id7 •• ®IF" •.• ®I&I M MIM ,.•• •• • •• � •• mm® 1=1111=1NImmmm �mmmmmfflm �I :•• MM • •• ®fl= • •• MME REDUCER BUSHING SXG . A CAP M • ••.'®m®' ® aoii •••'mmm_ ® . ••:•® •• •• ® 111011111111 =I,$ MIMmmmm M =Me Ilmi ®• M11=1 mrZI111121.4,21m . • •:�r� •� �� M • • .M® . •• �• �Illwmmlmm ..: � . •• 1� 1 •• .:.. . •• ®I• MMME !mom ..• •. ® •• •. • .• ®� DL�-4 PLUG SP � • • •�• �� ® 1.1.11» ®® 'DENOTES MOLDED FITTING. ALL OTHERS ARE FABRICATED. 493 r:, r w NO arig ILL Y� laii ea 1 77 Ord �re _. _._ • .n t4 ... r a. V _ \. . r. u.. 1� ✓iL'w.. . �_.. .1 1\ _ ... �. '.�'.� ... _./ ��d 4 ter •r... \1.� 1 J l LiJ`y _. Ic N.d .w .•�.J suety+, K�.iraYL VF ta.Ji� _ -� _. _ _.. ... _.. ... .. .. ... ��••��••.. � few r y- a r:, r w NO arig ILL Y� laii ea 1 Detectable I Our DETECTABLE marking tape provides for easy buried pipeline detection and below ground identification, protection and warning when properly installed. The tape can be located below ground with a non - ferrous metal detector, when buried at the proper depths. We recommend bury depths of: TAPE WIDTH 2" 3" 6" 12 "orwider TAPE BURY DEPT[ 1 6" -18" 6 " -28" 6 - 6" 6" -36" TAPE MUST BE BURIED FLAT FOR MAXIMUM DETECTABILITY AND LINE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONS: CINtt /t" DETECTABLE marking tape shall consist of a minimum 5 mil (0.005 ") overall thickness; five -ply composition; ultra -high molecular weight, 100% virgin polyethylene; acid, alkaline and corrosion resistant. Elongation properties shall be in accordance with ASTM D882 -80A and shall be less than 150% at break. The tape shall have a 20 gauge (0.0020 ") solid aluminum foil core, encapsulated within 2.55 mil (0.00255 ") polyethylene hacking. 0 Tape colorand legend combination shall be in accordance with A.P.W.A. or local requirements. The color shall be WEA . The legend shall readeRNltorl S BItt21L-DSLK-i(14 SL11 . The tape tensile strength shall be in accordance with ASTM D882 -80A and be not less than 7,800 PSI. it Tape width shall be 6 - ( For best results we recommend a tape width at least 3/4 of the diameter of the pipeline being protected. A 4" diameter line would use 3" or wider tape for optimum protection). The tape shall be manufactured by T. Christy Enterprises.The model number shall be TA- DT- XX -XXX. (See model number designations on the following page). ! '. "•. yr: t i k •Y. 1.,, r ♦ . y. Y7tr Y ,,f K ' rY l kyyr� .� r A ' '� P.O. Box 1839 • San Marcos, CA 92079 • Fax 760/737 -8593 A Subsidiary of Inland Concrete Enterprises, Inc. June 30, 2000 Civil Constructors P.O. Box 6 El Cajon, CA 92022 -006 Re: OAKLEY - WILDFLOWER PHASE III — JOB #715 Subject: Submittal Data for Sewer Manhole Attn: Stratie This is to certify that manhole components for the above referenced project will be manufactured in our plant and shall meet the applicable requirements of ASTM C -478, and AASHTO M -199 standards. The manholes for this project will be per the San Diego Regional Standards S -17 designed for H2O loading. Steel reinforcing for precast units shall be minimum .250 dia cold drawn steel wire (ASTM A -82), wound spirally to meet the area requirements of ASTM C- 478 / AASHTO M -199. All concrete used in the manufacture of precast units contains Type -V Portland Cement conforming to ASTM C -150. Concrete for precast items shall be minimum compressive strength of 4000PSI in 28 days. Concrete for cast in place base shall be minimum 3250 PSI in 28 days. Cast iron ring and cover shall be per ASTM A -48 class 35B, and Federal spec. RRF -621 per SDRSD M -3. Joint sealant for precast units shall be #CS -102 -B Flexible Bitumen Sealant Rope. Safety steps shall be installed on one vertical row, on 15" C.C. on the upstream side of the manhole. Steps shall be steel reinforced co- polymer polypropylene (M.A. Ind. #PS2 -PFS). Thank you, ,q XA dc— Robert Lara Vice President PLANT. 2511 Harmony Grove Rd., Escondido, CA 92079 Licensed ZEBRON Polyurethane Applicator - Manhole Lining & Rehabilitation �i 0 MIX ID PRECAST UNITS CONCRETE MIX DESIGN 4033502 (06] 4000 PSI NN. MEN aa cc Hww Aggregates P. gm SoWl,..9 Rtglm P.O. 8. 639009 -�• . . San Diego. CA 92163 -MM 9139 Hud: PwA Rood 5m Diego, CA 971 A$ Tel MO-715 -6600 - .. Fu 058 - 716.3601 CON97tACTOR B &. W PRECAST P)LOTECT : VARIOUS LOCATIONS SOURCE OF GONCRH'l -K HANSON CONSTRUCTION TYPE 6GO- C -4000P / 4000 PSI @ 'L8 DAYS PLACEMENT : DOOM PUMP Olt PLACE WE.IG11TS PER CUBIC YARD ASTM C -150 TYPE II /V CEML•'NT, LB ASTM C -618 CLASS F FLYASH, LB WASilrD-CONCRCTE SAND - 43Y., 1.1) HANSON 1" x N4 - 57%, 1,13 WATER, LB (GAL-US) TJDTAL AIR, % ASTM C -494 TYPE A /D, OZ —US WATER /CEMENT RATIO, LBS /1_B SLUMP, IN CONCRETE UNIT WLIG11T,.PCF .-- _FZD = -8 =00 TUE 1:55 PM 858 715 5601 ,U 02/08/00 ,, ".ter• (SATURATED, SURFACE-DRY) YIELD, CU FT 5G4 7•.87 115 0.90 17.80 7.G5 J.1352 10. J. li 339 ( 40.6) 5.43 TOTAL 27.00 27.17 0.50 4.00 146..1 02/08/2000 13:45 FAX 858 715 5601 HANSON SALES 002/007 a CAST IN PLACE SEWER MANHOLE CONCRETE MIX DESIGN MIX ID : 3233502 (03) 3250 PSI "`Hanson Hwn Agg,cgate Pounc Southwest Re9'oo o0. Sm 639069 San Diego, CA 92163.9369 9729 Harts Plant Road San Diego, CA 9i 145 Tel 85B.715-55CO Fu 855-715-56C1 CONTRACTOR B & W PRECAST PROJECT : VARIOUS LOCATIONS SOURCE OF CONCRETE HANSON CONSTRUCTION TYPE 560 —C -3250 3250 PSI @ 28 DAYS PLACEMENT PLACE OR BOOM PUMP WEIGHTS PER CUBIC YARD ASTM C -150 TYPE II /V CEMENT, LB ASTM C -618 CLASS F FLYASH, LB WASHED CONCRETE SAND — 43%, LB HANSON 1" x k4 — 57%, LB WATER, LB (GAL —US) TOTAL AIR, % ASTM C -494 TYPE A & D, OZ —US WATER /CEMENT RATIO, LBS /LB SLUMP, IN CONCRETE UNIT WEIGHT, PCF 02/08/00 (SATURATED, SURFACE —DRY) YIELD, CU FT 479 2.44 97 0.74 1333 7.97 1721 10.57 330 ( 39.5) 5.28 TOTAL 27.00 23.05 0.57 4.00 146.7 FEE- E -00 TH 1:55 PM 858 713 5601 2 5 Precast Inc. P.O. Box 1839 • San Marcos, CA 92069 / p U O pp)00 0 J a O 0 �0000�OF C. °O °G °O O O J O OO O p u p 0 n0 0 0 u0 r0 ° p° p n ry 4 n ry 04000 p�110U " n O 1" n U U rl n n n Il II ll II n n n rl o ll " rO p rQ p ,] " n n p'au °J 1, 0011000 0 0 O a 0 O 0 n U O o" J ° ° 0 q u 0 p° O Orr/ q 9 \O J A O 4 0 / ,00<. n o ` ��u^'rflrU U o pn „IO�r'`i 39Wi” 3856" 3B' /e' 24'/x" I 24" —T 6" 36" w 44" General Information 1325 (3 Pc) SET WEIGHT Frame 330Lbs Outer cover 320 Lbs Innercover -155 Lbs Total 1305 Lbs APPROVED By-- ... -- - - - - -- -- Title: - - -- . —.� - - Agency: -- - - - - -- - .. - Date: .-- - - -- - - COMMENTS — — • All materials used in MFG. shall conform to ASTM •A- 48 -35B • Frame & cover bearing surfaces machined to assure close, quiet fil. • Castings shall be dipped in block biluminous paint. • Frame and cover exceeds F1 -20 wheel loading. * Castings shall meet federal spec. # RRF621 * Marking shall be marked ''SEWER" or "STORM DRAIN" as required * Agency identification shall be cast on face of cover .rr APPLICATION AND SEALING PROPERTIES • Provides permanently flexible watertight joints. • Low to high temperature workability: O CS -102 -B & CS- 102 -DO -B ..... 45 °F to 130 °F. • Rugged service temperature resistance of –30 °F to + 200° F. • Excellent chemical and mechanical adhesion to clean and dry surfaces. • Greater cohesive and adhesive strengths. • Sealed joints will not shrink, harden or oxidize upon aging. • Available in numerous standard sizes: • Specific area cross sections designed for spe- cific joint requirements. • Lengths ..... 36" or 42" strips, plus rolls up to 21'. • Custom cut lengths at minimum costs. • Lower sealing costs resulting from use of proper sizes. ®• Controlled flow resistance for application ease. • Primer is not usually required, however, if tempera- ture is below 50 °F, or installation is in a wet hole, or Any Size, Shape, Length, or Material to meet specified requirements. a dust condition exists, apply Concrete Sealants rec- ommended primer. • Meets Federal Specification SS -S -00210 (210 -A) and AASHTO M -198B. FOR SELF - SEALING JOINTS IN: • Concrete Manholes • Concrete Pipes • Vaults • Utility Boxes • Sewer Construction • Septic Tanks — • Box Culverts • Vertical Panel Structures PROVEN SEALANTS FOR THE PRECAST CONCRETE INDUSTRY CONCRETE SEALANTS Technical Data Flexible Bitumen Sealant is CS -102 -B & CS- 102 -DO -B CHEMICAL COMPOSITION °' Spec;':;;:. -ci:' �: ;,:. Required:: CS-1 -B & CS102 -DO -B Hydrocarbon plastic content % by weight ASTM D4 (mod.) 50 -70 52.1 Inert mineral filler % by weight SS- S -210A 30 -50 47.9 Volatile Matter % by weight ASTM D6 3.0 max. 1.0 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES - Spec Required CS -102 -B & CS102 -DO -B Specific Gravity, 77 °F ASTM D71 1.20 -1.35 1.22 Ductility, 77 °F ASTM D113 5.0 min. 8 Softening point, ring and ball eF ASTM D36 320° min. 3700+ Penetration, cone 77 °F, 150 gm. 5 sec. ASTM D217 50 -120 mm 62 mm Flash point, C.O.C., OF ASTM D92 6000 min. 630° Fire point, C.O.C., OF ASTM D92 6250 min. 6300 30 -Day Immersion: No visible deterioration when tested for 30 days in 5 %, caustic potash, 5% Hydrochloric Acid, 5% Sulphuric Acid, or 5% saturated Hydrogen Sulfide. i� INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS Clean surface. VERTICAL JOINTS ON ROUND, ELLIPTICAL, HORIZONTAL JOINTS t OR ARCHED PIPE, OR BOX CULVERTS. Apply CONSEAL all around Butt at Joint. F spigot. savor \ /. r Apply CorISEAL on upper 180° of spigot and i r lower 180° of bell. Allow sufficient overlap of ConSEAU to form a joined seal. LIMITED WARRANTY The following limited warranty applies to our products and Is in lieu of all warranties of merchanlablllly, fitness for purpose, or other warranties, express or implied: namely, that the product will be free of delecis In workmanship or material, shall expire one year from me date of shipment and our limit of liability shall consist of making available a replacement product. As we have no control of conditions under which this product may be used, or the methods of application thereof, users should lest the product for their requirements. CONCRETED SEALANTS INC. -- 8917 S. Palmer Road • P.O. Box 176 • New Carlisle, Ohio 45344 Form CS102 2189 Telephone: (513) 845 -8776 • FAX: (513) 845.3587 Printed In USA j Copolymer Polypropylene Plastic 112- GRADE 60 STEEL REINFORCEMENT M.A SECTION -A P.O. Box 2322, 303 Dividend Dr. • Peachtree City, GA 30269 • Phone: (770) 467.7761 • Molding Sales Fax: (770) 467 -1462 • Corporate Fax: (770) 6314679 Memo To: Joe Massie Here's your storm drain pipe submittals for the 18" RCP, 24" RCP, & 30" RCP on the "OAKLEY- WILDFLOWER" project. Job number 715. Please give these submittals to your inspector for their files. Thanks, Stratie Christo .. 131/1 REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE DRY CAST - TONGUE AND GROOVE JOINT DESIGN ®STANDARD WALL ❑ THICK WALL MANUFACTURING DATA •J I CIR CAGE UIA CIRL;ULAR CAGE HLINF. ILONG RODS ClB9NC COILS u t- w P/RAElEI 10 ENO - -'� Of PIPE {fYi') 5 P IN 1% 01 11A o el LONGITUDINAL ROD !' - K j i K m N 944 Ill Piz IR M� Q Y K IY u F. 1'31/4' Jp1 O F, � 7' -10' CAGE LENGTH S (1. CDACKT MORTAR 4 R Ill LL ynf ggq• Ill /l. S IE PLACED IN TIEIO 131/1 REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE DRY CAST - TONGUE AND GROOVE JOINT DESIGN ®STANDARD WALL ❑ THICK WALL MANUFACTURING DATA I INSTALLATION DATA GENERAL CAGE UIA CIRL;ULAR CAGE HLINF. ILONG RODS A 5 o el 1 a A. K j i K rp F R. -R 944 Ill Piz IR M� Q Y K IY u F. Q 6 W Jp1 O F, � Q i K S (1. 11L 4 R Ill LL ynf ggq• Ill /l. S IE 24 1350 2.17 Jo• 7.0' a -1.66 2e.4o 26.12 .13 .23a 3.0 4.00 1.06 1.70 12 .236 6.01 130 .75 312 1.91 1.75 .27 2146 24 IWO 7.12 30• 3.0• a -1.66 76.40 26.17 .15 .236 3.4 3.56 1.06 1.70 12 .236 11901 1.36 .75 312 1.91 1.75 .27 2352 f4'1 'l -NOTE: PIPE 00 BASED MINIMUM WALL THICKNESS SHOWN. PIPE WALL TAPERS FROM • 3 -3/16' AT THE BELL ENO 70 r AT THE SPIGOT ENO. Concrete t Steel P Group i of S Soutnem Collfomie Owde ;on 24' CRY CAST STANWO AO1NT SECTION oe+.w I w •/24/e LAKESIOE FLAW 1 Rewsmd mod lope, note 2/29/21 t4P11 o4nlm STUM p.N I II, jmlvt ,,.,, P F 10 2 61 1 3. ) 'J' I 1 >f LONCRUOINAL ROD ± I° Y CLOSING COBS PARALLEL TO END OF PIPE OYP) --j 'G e t'31 /4•T•--I f -- REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE DRY CAST - TONGUE AND GROOVE JOINT DESIGN CIR CEMENT 140RTAN PLACED IN FIELD TYPICAL SECTION THRU PIPE ® STN WALLW L THICK WALL MANUFACTURING DATA INSTALLATION DATA A G i E W I I S Cl C2 F Gi I Ge K K K K I44L K K 9t• K 116 K K K 1..238&01 I9 K , ML 0r 1 11, 111 2000 1.4] 2Y 2.S4 6-1.43 21.]4 19.75 .14 .178 3.1 3.61 .875 1.]9 12 1.38 .063 .06] 2.49 106] .e7 1509 16 2750 1.43 2Y 2Y 8-1.43 21.]4 11.75 .16 2]9 ].6 ].]4 .875 1.59 12 1.30 .063 .06.7 2.49 1.063 .R7 1518 18 7500 1.4] 2Y 1.Y a -1,43 11.]4 19.75 .le .z]e 40 197 .875 1A8 12 1.]6 .063 .06.7 2.49 1 -OU .e7 1513 '1 �tic: me uy yl]Ly Y lI * WALL IMICKNL.ti 5HUWN. PFE RYL TAPERS FROM E 2- 11/16' AT THE BELL MD TO 2 -1/2' AT THE SPIGOT ENO_ 1 RWN9Wd 2000 -0 DESIGN -7l -95 MPY v"m RW>011 K1[ A ■r4Yo ((yy��,,��,,,,�,.,,,��,�,,,�,, CmcrWIW • S14W1 FiF• Croup a 31YIllyFl1111 SaWh4 Calf"re Oivhio6 s le' DRY CAST STANOAAO JOINT SECTION WWI 5 n 4/7/m LME31DE PLANT F O 0 J CM 1 CLOSING COILS ,LL t0 ENO OF PARALLEL PI u_ 4f; O% PIPE (fYP) T m LONGITUDINAL ROO Ike; �1 1 7' -10' CAGE LFNCTHI 7' -10' CAGE LENGTH I I I "-CEMENT YONTAR 1 1 I I muvn iN Ran 1'E 1/4 'F" REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE DRY CAST - TONGUE AND GROOVE JOINT DESGN ® STANDARD WALL E THICK WALL MANUFACTURING DATA INSTALLATION DATA A E w I I S I CI C1 a [.20 •. IA7. K K K K A. K IN Yp! M. tit n. L 30 7000 7.12 37 3.5' a -1.66 34.77 ]2.50 .23a 3.4 3.56 1.25 2.01 12 .238 80] 1.38 .75 312 1.55 175 3]52 30 1350 - 2.12 37 ].5• 8 -1.68 34.77 32.50 .23A 4.s 2.67 ,.IS 2.01 12 23a 8.03 1.36 75 ]12 1.55 1.75 .22 3]71 30 1500 2.12 37 15• a -1.68 34.77 32 50 .235 5.4 2.22 1.25 201 12 .23a a.0] I.Sa .75 311 1.55 1.75 .22 336.5 -NOTE: PIPE 00 BASEO MINIMUM WALL THICIINIESS S404114. PIPE WALL TAPERS FROM 3- 11/16- AT THE BELL ENO TO 3 -1/2- AT THE SPICOT ENC. dM �CCcn14 t Slow pipe cf L a n it ie .0" 30' ORY GIST STANWO JOINT SECTION 011x, I M 4/1I i LAKESIDE PLANT PF10261 16.0 r T S J w V1 a m pK W Apr -18 -01 08 :38A SOUTHLAND PAVING,INC 760 747 1073 P.Ol r Southland Paving, Inc. 361 North Hale Ave., Lscondide, CA 92029 FAX Date: 06122/99 Number of paves including cover sheet: To: Todd Bomback CITY OF ENCINITAS Lngineei'ing Department Phone: 760- 633 -2770 Fax phone: 760- 633 -2818 CC'. From: Bob Spellman SOUTT ILA ND PA V ING, TNC. Phone: 760 - 747 -6895 Fax phone: 760.747 -1008 REMARKS: ❑ Urgent ® For your review ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please cummcnL Ref: ENCINITAS TRACT 98 -139 Sub: 5uBM1TTAL MANUFACTURED BY HANSON AGGREGATES, TWIN OAKS PLANT Class 11 Base Apr -aS -01 08:38A SOUTHLANO PAVING,INC 760 747 1073 P.02 i SIPP CONSULTING GROUP (888) 673 -1777- Telephone 4455 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 100 (868) 873-0069 - Facsimile San_ Diego California 92123 December 21, 2000 HAN50N AGGREGATES P.O. Box 639069 Son Diego, Caorrua 92163 -9069 Attention: Mr. Ed Chapman PROJECT: SAN MARCOS - CL. II AGGREGATE BASE CONF ORN4ANCE TESTING Gentlemen_ The attached test repertwas prepared to accordance wi h the project plans and specificatwns, and applicanle ASTM procedures- No ergineenng opinion is implied or expressed- Sincerely, JcAxKP, Sipo. In. P.E. JPS Jc Attachment i :rip ArF'N `rte O.E.12s � m / m a 23 Apr -18 -01 08:38A SOUTHLAND PAVING.INC 760 747 1073 P_03 Fax McSSage This fax eessago Is cenfldencla! and intended Esc tha a04et64ea only If lneacceccly coact +e. please t ncsct the aendtc and :0"tn le cne M11 w cne ac=tors oppesit&. oze Oat• fiT/jH / /7 1 ro company ��O ri Fax `. eo -->-z-2 /4'� 6 react �(�(/ GREG MINGA S' .v 858 - 715 -5601 Sae) ace QUOTATION TO FOLLOW Pages V including this One mQ■ END °'Hanson Hanson Aggrega:es PA.If Lc Savthv'esc Aeon P.O. pax 639069 San Otago. a 92.43 -9049 Tai 14541 715 -7609 raa fsisl %3 -5su; vw.hantanpl r.. rew MATERIALS QUOTED WILL COME O T OF THE FOLLOWING PLANT: A/C PLANTS: ❑ P -1 CARLSBAD u P-4 SAN MARCOS o P -22 MIRAMAR o P -233 LAKESIDE 16135REGATE PLANT .a: P -13 SAN MARCOS O P-M2 CARROLL CANYON ❑ P-Mi ELCAJON ❑ P -042 PALA SAND ❑ P•516 CARLSBAD O 9-37 MIRAMAR O P -10Z CHULA VISTA PROCESSING a P -152 CHANNEL ROAD o P.m OTAY QUARRY a P -111 VIGILANTE ❑ P -132 EL MONTE ❑ P•Z32 LAKESIDE Apr -18 -01 08.38A SOUTHLAND PAVING,INC SIPP CONSULTING GROUP 4455 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 100 San Diego, California 921234379 760 747 1073 (856) 573 -1777 - Telephone (858) 573 -0069 - Facsimile PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF AGGREGATES P_04 Client HANSON AGGAL"TE.S Job No. Labllnvaot No. Caiceaaa Sa, 26 Diu of Aepon Owmber'_1.2000 Rwie�ed By 4:2 _ PtaSect CONFORMANCE TE3TiNG Location 52e blarees SawPled 21y Ea C52PMAM Dale 1lam T"t of Ae{rcgwc QA D A[L=M Raw Submined By Diu ru of wspesw Sar;%v Aabo dBy Ed Chi Nnan Oaee r111 Tort Srnndv xASTMv morhfr ist mmd SING Skb. w..a -tt. SIaYFMON to Raolu 3i�if�wa I Tor STD %=ftrA 69ela 190 I ASTM 692 X33 lod1w" M few I 2 ' I AnM C.11 duribill lodes 2' Go aO -40 Ix 100 loo 3/d 95 -100 v2 79 ya Wes. 100 rcv. % Wow 300 rtv, 0 -10 aK f3 73.55 es 42 CJ34 GrAdift air 30 300 py Etudawn M 19 10 -30 130 11 1100 G 1 l 011113 x200 I as 2.9 Non Planic .aeTat 0111 V .& to Raolu 3i�if�wa I Tor STD %=ftrA 69ela 190 I ASTM 692 X33 lod1w" M few I I AnM C.11 duribill lodes Go aO -40 1 ya Wes. 100 rcv. % Wow 300 rtv, 15 Mu, 52 MM I ell% OW Yrra. 1i WOr_ Rv. CJ34 GrAdift it Woe 1000 rev. IL.Vyae A 300 py Etudawn 81 10 Mia 1 l 011113 id Limit Plasue- ledalr Non Planic Chao V .& Cax h7 Saed ivYao VYUe 39 I all I MolmOe D°°m R.1w ant ?4M Dry Daunt'. 7ef i Opcewm Meiscurt 9c 1 ?/wend 1391 I y= O pME 0 ! O olm �QO �io spcct& Gro h(y Abau19oa. x BWR 0)17) . 1 o C11- O CLN 1 DWR (mil APPOPM SAFETY FIRST Welghmaster Certificate THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the following Ceacnbed commodity was weighed, measured, or counted by a wiUghmaster, whose signature is on this certlflc.m. who is a racoetaed authony of accuracy, as prescribed by Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 12700) of Division D of file Celgomla Business and Professions Coda . administered by the Division of Measurement Standards of the California Department of Food end Agnousure. 2237077 Seller makes no warranty of any kind, express or implied, mgerding the materll and all warranties, including any Implied warranty of merchantability or of Mness for a peQicular purpose, are hereby excluded. DRIVER Remarks = �ad�ng shall M {0 minutes IOf Vuek 8lrensfer eild ]a minWes for Wean damp, pW H pup end +0 - + °e• •. Time 8 Weighing Location 1Allows The Material is sold by the cubic yard. cubic a r or er Customer full re wlBdgN tl'91 the$hall hit a Maerial ortlared has been determined by Me Customer. a Customer aaeumb lull responsiblllry, and Shell hold Soler harmless, regarding the adequacy of ttre amount of Metedal orderetl. 1 ' - HANSON AGGREGATES PACIFIC SOUTHWEST, INC. •� P.O. BOX 639069 SAN DIEGO, CA 92163 -9069 DISPATCH PHONE: 858 -577 -2727 1 -877- 942 -6766 (TOLL FREE) Data Customer No Order No Customer P.O. or Job No. Prolecf No Delivery Ticket No Truck No. Truck Type V.1 itle or License No Trailer or Lcense No Trailer or boonse No Customer Name Special Instructions Job Address Tons/Yards Product Code Description Tons/Yards Total Unit Price Amount Gross Tare Net GROSS & TARE CE RTIFICATIGN OF TARE WEIGHT FOR Sub Driver On:❑ Off:❑ Due on Job MATERIAL HAULERS Total Imp w.whl .1 the eu I do wtllty Thal vie em AaPt 10bd I. iM MM'MUM dr .me traYr wip A&I I read uppers and Mal n p N. mapcndIh1ey M Te m 1p maim. r' I - HANSON AGGREGATES 4OU61 W01iI W Net IM letalt erewetghl of ma vehl,ln suLL n + ro T MF r .. r Cartage g PACIFIC SOUTHWEST. INC. Arrive on Job THE RECORDEO TARE WEIGHT LISTED It u alsn wmBnmaeur or deputy "Me rums .'pal on Ih.e wm:. Sales I o Hal mabnw in ViYYe M tierce acil Gapml ], S. I.ri 14Ppd of Celibm'a Ed.mesp H Plat,...,, � � � T� Weighmaster Let�t by /Job b V DRIVERS SIGNATURE Total Deputy Received by ❑ No one available to sign. customer waives receipt signature. (First delivery ticket buyerlcontractor signature release must be signed.) CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: 'TELEPHONE: 5 - /o -of rYkIlC2.7 C6�cr[ on 5i yv /ri ex rt%5sicw� MaGh�nc ri5t4( /i ro! /�J c&--b aec a e/'. PlanS s f5 UrC Q!/ 6e, f /lokaxs. v yC4i`4 3 log /us S/,vrf PCR's o,,^ Arco FicawEx YAcc DRruE• 5-11-o/ Alo Acnvi7s S -/l/-O/ -*WALL 2 /1 0677fiN/NG coo9a- /S 6,nAV, BUtcT +7- TnF G 5tgu 4"..J& M.)4i2jEft sale cle AOA -/J. Auc .t .SDGE «T 0?;V J or" t,4? 4177"rXv, AG o DEr� 17- GoULO Goof � - .r 7-D40 ry //E AT 2 c /L Lou,ge- i R iO &W."17- i S •U01- / 5-17-0/ Ido A� ml t. ✓c qt^r a P unoh Its oya r 0011, G uG .s /G.V ctcG 5-21ro/ /h /SSr�/6 Aea6J o orwbSl SEcm s +9 AWAI& luzorso. 5-23-0' (3 !oX /0'XZ' rs6.PAW,'6 k&sr DX /0,WA /A¢/r i4_n4LL4ev ram r, vrr_ Cont6rjrc7DCS LYaQ LY.;hvs V �vtcs. 5 -Z9- 01 5- .30 -0/ (P -7 -ol ' 2' PST wHtc woxot LoA.nNUES• �Ruw Or7tN i le G r,e 104h; a^ . .5'7 E As -19-129101. „Z ,U0l -2G4rrJ .SU/Y. LY,e7 P 1465 GIGG s,� tti &j& � sNov� ,vq- aE, � ccAtt A-L. r 4-�OA17' o.J 77AC ✓"I irr Z-mH 4h.)r c(/rr is reMovetr, lincl� /rSf dews co,r A.0 � be uAew -teC on. iu2c�s �7oulo`ris are lx/ ;1r grat/Cd Uut ra�- P, /� 64)e %Oar,tc�dyc 7 -7-0/ OVER L.gsT rY+eM 2ir (/>n MES P44 V6- ee� S6T yD noe 4xX- ,u G ,eA�oeb AWO c o+n V c aPEV . 7-/(2-0/ ..so/r+E G AI iN G LRS* Aires r/rr,6W"o' WWIil rQn?arnC{e/ ' 1 ee (. Zle7e GtL{;D*, ol��(til5t. r 7-19 -of in °//LLn Cancr�la t Curb rC 1TiinS (� tc vFt pu,�7e D ,qe,o w rt p tco wir- - v4um D.Q r vE a fr y eo,,W15. fA!MS._�PI1U2b/. 6K /C %'C P Qj'C MArrot j/ p. k -N 1.)/ur . m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT /n $�Dec�bn Urt •h/ �iH olio w 7A� , 4i`#ZS . e - /o -ao ApOroued wi' S aI/ -/. -1h (L/ Z! 4-oC B -/ / / (Z- L rudhftv-o, 7�y Pour c21 hec&(waas lv)c. uw remit _/ , P.n v rg h 4 (oi,a 9-H-06 SPec; -ca ons o� was (3 Zue , -i, o (act co cle Ae 77i e foes 7a 2) /(o pr. 7� 6- B -/ (i I -#x 140S •,'a (2 2/ 'PT. Q -( /nle7.S. t6,c' ?s -11b ,hle�s� crud 2 h {adr.IOC(S. C'or)C�ek Scl�atuled Z (on, 6 -1 -cwu {y"-'ns rar15C?V4f' s cr acs ,Pj�c �n,d in(CfS Dom, , and 1 47747 ,cd'. L=, v,'/ C a , y4nu Cs t u of r� on -/6 -vo 41 2 di55.p2fo.S roc it P_ e " ¢yt`ftr f�'Qn,�tf. ,Q .G. hack -ia 6[ s'hat/!d dog., ��»» ac o cfcr{P /•4' o� roct 7h/-s c--,)J et/c�7 donf. ?aAre 64-ye D. or -/o p/ac e rock. ALL Woa-1r L.u.,lt3z FRELATED LI&Ls3-R O&LwO %#oH7Xrr-' 8-Z3 -oo L,2s-t of o,v.wLU bock occurd 471. Lint c-.� bel,, . m14429 DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: St�uGto.S Cu+ /hs /. ;9 u.a r �aCr /i+ri'ts under ,y?0vD'6 in 5 ecr5' %he Givd/ Cvr -yl- 6eW Cre&0 ocr 7`/K Z G7: / iti(US 7D 77)E- /( f7- 6-1 % /cis 7fr 074 vE 77,1E o. 7a PcACE CCWC4ZESE • 44 se.;� r.v4atzrF 6:,M17? 6-f' 7wo (z) f- r Borers fo3V cznd S /OtOO• 044& 72+E o.e. -A� place cc.,c. a7 or bcoc cf srw. /5 Ate` /Otoo tAr /$'r .QCre /tfrN 61ro<r r4NO 7hey d y� e eape S r--r 72> A607- . No rc&4e- 40 8-9- Do C�i yy,% ConS/✓uGY�.'S c o��+'nu� w�)`'Ci• I.�stcs!(afioh ndt Q. In . W . A s c1'7b✓1 CL, st-. box Clew 5 are ��nr /x�t Laf r fectdc. P/ y L(aelglS Sf✓UCtZr�rs air( wrlC /n $�Dec�bn Urt •h/ �iH olio w 7A� , 4i`#ZS . e - /o -ao ApOroued wi' S aI/ -/. -1h (L/ Z! 4-oC B -/ / / (Z- L rudhftv-o, 7�y Pour c21 hec&(waas lv)c. uw remit _/ , P.n v rg h 4 (oi,a 9-H-06 SPec; -ca ons o� was (3 Zue , -i, o (act co cle Ae 77i e foes 7a 2) /(o pr. 7� 6- B -/ (i I -#x 140S •,'a (2 2/ 'PT. Q -( /nle7.S. t6,c' ?s -11b ,hle�s� crud 2 h {adr.IOC(S. C'or)C�ek Scl�atuled Z (on, 6 -1 -cwu {y"-'ns rar15C?V4f' s cr acs ,Pj�c �n,d in(CfS Dom, , and 1 47747 ,cd'. L=, v,'/ C a , y4nu Cs t u of r� on -/6 -vo 41 2 di55.p2fo.S roc it P_ e " ¢yt`ftr f�'Qn,�tf. ,Q .G. hack -ia 6[ s'hat/!d dog., ��»» ac o cfcr{P /•4' o� roct 7h/-s c--,)J et/c�7 donf. ?aAre 64-ye D. or -/o p/ac e rock. ALL Woa-1r L.u.,lt3z FRELATED LI&Ls3-R O&LwO %#oH7Xrr-' 8-Z3 -oo L,2s-t of o,v.wLU bock occurd 471. Lint c-.� bel,, . m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: /0 00 7o,,./r 7QE/ 11 t36C�4�/ 7Ao 7X lGtrr.�C� ON� . /0 4 oo ]p,w!'T 7&gFVCLs XW6, oNcy 1 U y /o� o a erg ac hw 6, L>n Ja �y eiic�, , Comet ✓ S c fez / c /017 00 Gvf1LKE7J J-b/ r�2Jf! -/ Hx»F2K. fiLL /tloT�TD ,�' EG/Fic S, /o /9 w 7b,�? T�*rc -H N,co gressr,�v s!_o�cy • /rlcf Tefe, ntv-t . 77-a , G J111160 Lasf Mee) e an 6e 6b c,K4Yope. Sfi' /% S ems, s `/- oe- ,hiya /(.'.,y jas Jo/%r %, G os 7S tench, Subs 5 G � � / 7r• 11 /Yi ' t S(. e S . // r. oo SLV CoA,77n+uc- 70 a P RoHc�s 4WV- ,eA . 7D BE CVA fiver Pbc jeaw : nW- a/Z o! G.F. Lvhi(loc!< s of S/7� cu,rH 2 scr�er,5 .rra cam¢ c.,r " -T- Ca ' /ed L o < ,Po f}dynS 7v adL fw 1425L-t- a �auneirf u�r�m a tzl e� I'- ge:z/u, rrd . u Aleml -Ah1r iN,6 C -fads ova 3 01 I- C,411-47 AcK • o�rp Etorx AsJo/ U Fi2oM v r1inS a,g-s 14-L,eetag 66i�:20 Do/�E - "RCr IOr /L„ Base G .b: Wh;JoCk cm/i; 6 to rjet Su�cade e ,% O•,o' . Ai- 7b 6er7w jeE]vQ7- 7' r*E 5//ylel 6.r. wlv! /oaK can- s:vse4 74v -nake Subgradr — Ir.T�U. {'.. /1,( /••[L T / /IW Ia.N .�G -N/ �J4 % /"` ^C .V ^' `• /1 V••v o ,n Cw 5// J S, Tto ✓WET TD WoFZK ,ll. tt�. yl1ol0' o *z- Pwrgl. Oi71c 7W W&r 7D lao4t - m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NAME: STREET LaCATION: CONTRACTOR: 41-12 -61 /lo t?4rrvrrr,/ • AWN", PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: TELEPHONE: y- r� -ol Alm Acmac.�• 17-6 V77/14[/D 4VIA4& AJ 1Wf4A16 su66R - _I" rc UQShrJ Zt.( hr. r)rhtP 76 (n sc t ub rdde- du�/Or. j base. A /SV rreca 0 r/d the rb So, /s frr l r. �5Aow1nn 95'r° /e(• coo, ho'? . Src%.rr IN 3` IDYz" Bw. �/ -lB-D� Scr�rl, /ond Confines /NaL..�cj Sr�r4ru. ('a„t,/�, ccz...Paclit� �a cor(/ 4-1- s�I QLcvU om4e 1Ylo1''5A,,e akl •fo tmkt4 sure elc- l�c6b—1 e3 nn rb Ur5C . - /9 -a/ Checke/ Su.64;rade for co -trek n-, ex to Q /w+s V soets, alyl- /!ab/" ctf graa'c tell ry' aw ym",ly, C!e(�JP. Lti�ti, M&I' s /Yiare a��• Lo" Ike/ err aee L� r 7>iwr?as - A4,eo F,atre ,�,c o. tb dur>• /> >s ,Y,u �rocu , �aas�s u„ -Zo -ol CLAS5 12 4&QSe fructR/ h {adac/, Vei,{y� reels ihafcvrc� 5ubrrrrY7`g /. �oufL� /o v9 4'aVin29 /Gra,cG�Q !' C�OL✓r) Oi7lct• bC rbSSiiXj M Coa�fion (r'!r/ Jr !_font /nUndO<� S! 23 al%- Curb /,'ne en /io.• Once Curb _ � 9utfr! rs ihs�2( /�di �Cfio�? / C(- BQSe q -23-ol Cronsra9 <rade ry esfrt( uau r�x rxrr r� fa..�( 4-244-0/ CLUB 9L17� °� C/Oay sT 60se gs .� of 6c t� °i • .7 (w, r(� No% �! -/tzK G2/f9G C/N%7[ f�vrr� 3�r yS-O/ Alo - 4cr?vr74 Ganr(crc/[ rime 4e Ccsr Ort 55-7 -' � i 5-3-01 - 7 -0/ ,;� RcrrV /rt.7. �o AcYlr l 5 -.9-ot 4montan eencrc{r ,5"r, 54ryy ec4,0sa, µcu(rt�nr. /u t*. r�uh kt/ Pm , Li vE A-unT m14429 4- -71-coAm, CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: Cons -t uve .?)n rr7ee75�19 h'2W a 9 ,V"gLl sec hz..,c />` fa- /fens c/:scussrG. 5,q✓ Zy'e eenp SyakCUmorYO cJ w d n Gvh, / /oc� 7`r Aea'" �)k" rira �Drrio /rots $/S o0 ��earh�q y 9rubhA'�q -/ 1 /d %hn fa I afoi s' Ala ni S7 Sos t-1 rl hr r lka USA- )w-eAo -- of ProkJm"14�r -,$v 30'/ Sewv oat7`l(f (Jne . 5 9 ov telmjy 4,e4;,q cK 'l Pd a-- oire .,�. sce ve s ii /oo cywry z� ee49 cp sr CuCi SidC o� /Q2r'� , one si7�. o AcVvr ryA. 5 /5 Go 2 &OZE/25 Can177Al1/E R19br.uG /.v 4Nq #,eOLA"'V fi9RLEG 1. e&U war. is Re %vZ, 6.4- -4Rr16`?9 Hs zue1.4 As FrcG .1 'a `,6E2NG 19eLCXWAAu(9UTS Fee/,As "010e rjc-N F,form0 FieO/N. -ftJ �j[ cu ur rtC on on! pu�cc / s / a & con fi'n cr c , Z 7J6z6:5 6.1/ 5e7W C"17A-G e"T SG yoESJ[Jtyn/G � Mania' C .s / /d/oc, Keyway A foe eW 616P5 6-1 Alo,* siccc Ord Cct� �SlorgCS en f/j(< <5 N CaI I txr S1191oo i'Kvufibc dr/le 'l/iru . , Aj&A4 i'2q ccnusua/ -{y no-iP. ' S 15�0o ALL PAecEts .4RE 'a'tow mkc hL .4 rt /o7}/EIP D /.Lr 45 7,UG 7?9-XC / / -W[ . Cu7- r°9J3 9AW 047^1& W&V r-ba fits-4) %7G[. /41+Q5• Alol4owtA14, aou41TU1fr_ 7b AtoTL- . Wt occbret;l A-• LulLp�q.QwEiJ OLCYE FsU�7lliio.J cSn Fi4L . m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROTECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: fELEPHONE• s124(o0 Tog Do►�1N ye''X� iDUF, 7D a�i067.i7• o/'EPATD,e JE4,4t6n A LOoW67 -Z . AfO AJAV M BE 4-01f- FLl6F+7II� et/7" - 3. 0 o cctJOC /G 7D tP,ffi. A* f-.w 525 00 lets F�141-S�, PA,o Bu /co -u�a is oCCtrriroJ /c., ,6n F -do-ce / / $�Z(v u o - StY►�E f15 S 2 S S 3a oo L^crPs 7rrw,, Sau+`i� S/ mar c/ On co4 ��uc be �n ift l+nc1 use e � „'i/ ,�.rrt. sf�. lJv�cr. "K,zha�o� aF �[• coon cowywcrY� --, caQ,;K.,a -/-o �t.r/- �'d a�` Qi°P►c�pn i k infc. �d�S. Fos mee e"O /A16 SLOW so SrcAS a.& Jeb opera /sacs Sy%peeF . 471,10 � C 4,9-,s C p,vn AVe-< Awb p• /GCS OA/ p, 4R c eZ }2 . 7f/ /5 L-,:;57 815 �lo c o tr �e7c�{ G'raafino y4:� �. r rS'r a Srtc GPPrak. -x�)yK, G z w> i 64 t rn 00ec+' 7i, pace/ retedurls - fbllowrel. k B m Crews a e on /P' agl wes fCoarse fold hL(! geoder - co urd hp rP4iirrtd l�c{u � �� ra" be aCC4AtYCf. f LjrGd /iKJ /.S / — /l z.�ellCCcs e� un i� Cow/ S o- Co L. f?A 0, v / ran 57%Uc lea-s TUB SewG-. 777e t✓ILC s7p9 er -,.J Lowe 7a ac /2d, a-cir A -11h/ -time 41-f � -A-y' 7� 70�is oiarri 4,iicc BE LI-v oo /rlosf of d,' /y Whwe ol NeeW5 as K c,7 oc.r iINIM 4 S/o S z6vpe CG /%+ roacr a.td chokers, b 12 oo SLnpes dre being -fTl~ACd , ra ih9 hi 5k (s week. m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: (o 13 00 SL.)}}''bs coia-nNUE 7a PL 7JtiAM • NOT t7iUck awo?- 6)ri/)L--3 7-9 ,n,rn C0777,✓6, KoAZ2 f C/aoK&-reS, 411A0 467791AIIIVC, F/N6 NED G,e"9)0E ON />^V05 co"77"aes . Qu��1nEtlr �/JLC6b S TdB 7b /04,,ICE 4,✓ ,9.eE.9 tuNEieE C i✓ 14 Co.V5. 1iG7'b,¢S /5 / A/ 5 779GC W6 SELQ&?Z Plp9C-' U.�DEe LY sEPE e� i . GoN V otS s ,C� TiTrE SRw6c?- 77lE sna Cis ,eE#o G � 1>L 4,cm S 77elr:<.1 /- 4/ SINGE G6✓/= 4 /S %-,aom 4t , y /ct. Di QT �/� 7D CBE �odb /ir 77yi5 >f,Q� . (P l5 too o Cilangqe. 05 na'fCa' 46ove. /fear' ,ir,� 9 di' re," Q 2W4 .571-9 a;/ h¢cr be don . Sumac CUCC(• % 1Z(. Dlo4tr /5 6,E?AArO 57oGCP7Z4G2-? A7- . C3E Co�YS772ucrpj /A/ oxeArde 7r Xl"t t7Voc/bN F7L[ cTiFVEL pvt7H 8`( dF CU 6"7?• 71S /00 Qaco� a 2 weck5 Cav (a insp2cf in mll a1115ence 7?au�graDl <ngA i5 Co oleted WAS f rq r s -6 hta /� equ"pmcrt{-. -Pa as ak cjra c . Sl0(� s rh Mt " hp s S co�r s we/ rmec{ odd cut in w, f (. GhncK�s • ,Kwt� 4r tin rS Pr 3&ct t0 sfort -i morrow . 0,%4 t ca-,5rtr.,kc{vr`s Ts Cal - SX1'2 � ocick2rnivl -ecw,+- ho p- in bQSc 7 {o oo f^ �� ,Jbe. Ae r �y gtlk - ffeArt.vrl9 Sewev Cra n I --OO OM F(< wa ( s4a: x-f l o,�f �, Sewer OQi n Wc- ,,f ft'e -in lowr,4 - a,4 - Sewv fie.+c� r„3 zrr 75/00 SEWER- 7XEw4CH Delta 117 rt Ex,Snn G �+�4r/f,�oC E j S»4. 5D-), S/ -!a "- s7w . 5�9 e 367. Cyep - cjM7oti1 7D Acccvn0,0^t7S S m N a7` f was coArlel -rte - -447uC of B^ RK Secue/ %nary. c.,aS tnb/a//ed eyG /s }�Y.' /Hgry (e Or7Le'. ear"tk wdS oo Slre *ai o15�f��r/�oses ara�, a rb✓7ceelc lc.q G4? s j�:ourecl l Joif . 7- W l7 S/Wreor -Iry 5»• /7ry 756a'f s779. oda.ArrD XIE V - } gvO 7,'Dry we G�Dr �+h9 *,or a,,^0 Qrd s7`c+lyd r'! Nei C.X., 177- c% d7c� m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: 'TELEPHONE: 7- /0 - 00 - SF1�62 77c?F+kefl 2506 72' ^lxlO S�Ttj eOiQy 71&1 e 5 ar a 5 srrt - s,Jc1 t oo . t¢ Jtiye�S k �/� rnSYa t of P�olx+ a GY+r ✓ �eaue/ la�a.+[s'. 7�'bG (et -ee -fa --q5-&4-0. r" . w23 grin e c1Dc -r? ei/e Zo "ev. wi `u, :5 roct bet*4,:.aq bclf" aaS =o /v /e -Ft fr�,srd -/8.- *1e -6 ioTjDZ L ,?e- ./ '991� So S -!vinoO .Tie -/u roc'*-- re e- A� / a 'd Z per Sla Cs . - 4:Z�ER 7r-!EUcA/ auc, ru Sr TFicpyr,�luS� SOW. {13t0a R" pvc stz. e6' MA?At /= N Bt7A/6 L�04yf17 7d ,Q� w P /ac°-y,,� �lb�ieVe •fig S�.Fr. 4K 3 B45t Per '4lJ�c r i+ cana75 . 5 Et�E� t onpx�+C- rX&XKf/ES r auG .47- -0w. 4'G t 3a . ,416 ol� 7zti5 eZIAS oBSC�2 ✓Eb Due /�JG 77aE thoR.✓ivG 7- �2 -c+� s.m.K• s /, 2, and 3 cuerc 5tacges &7 B,c w . / a tcra ( /s 33-? e- ,e- er,7a /7 FT AEEp Arr- 7}fE QEEpE3T L o c,4r/ou T1s6xEfaLE /r� a� ))AY .SpfiuT TREa[cicfrn(!�. 1 L oo,t t- Ag7 57W. 45-e o a'd S"T 6714 . -r oo aicc / 3 mac/ 9 aVG the 0,/t. �v lx+c 7- /3�UU E�IT]LE• AQy SPENT /AJ- SriiCLr.v ?,f GGL 1. PG anJS t `stpCC Al. Coct., a a�-�ad o � � on I7yo-i 1c fC SAS' c2H 5 V spec e ? -, ter . 7-17 -,w 94-e-k (! e>ny ey ke Us .,„7 �e S eg05 t,uHh -0)c �xcavafov. ^! COVnhf C'o dC�an Dersocle // on sHe /Hon ,-:n7 anC{ eS�i 9. 7 -18-oo Face !( c,;n sues 10P�- m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: TELEPHONE: 7 /i 9 /0o ALL 58AAw- AIA-s 62@v oq./aifc r8� ,gv �O /GS C3L�7 f/s tlicitL E�/G „�/E 2 . Tip -I�s /)+o,¢nLNL, 11-NO �� ✓ia BKwhw/ TX�xrGvi�G c�vu� 7 a„cr ?`0 6 c 5 ",QM D OeA l-J 6EC214IJ BC -7�/4 04(6 A7 574. [� S r%ed evjf the 2/' 6-1 .n/ on !ht 9041– /0 P o.kd rw6 7NE 0.lG. -,D 64CICr7 U, , grcde Cam' 5n9. V9Y,25 79) elc44i� A Ca�CLi b4Sin5 cvC CwS,t�ucfr G,, zyilS run. Ly " 30 s7P,44" 0,e 4,^1 ,aue/S �/5 te4 fo -.1-7,57. 7;V&- AtAo6V fin, .9 L„4KrE 020 ex !r/4S CnG04ateYtd e,f 5ya. /y t70- .TOF /S EybSi�✓G de oCk 7n 1)�TFX,n1AWe /G F CR.V GEr a- ouT i+ .1774 Ej6U4VtMf4 [3uCX4LE7- A� yoo Pr Of ihis 77tZ7VC%7 A&AJ 4 Bet?9XETZ -. ff� npy. cort> ,P0616 '. .rpE /h4t� O C ,.�a y ,uv. eec otl Gq�rrY PrpE 7Lo,vtl . Bc� a!tj / Fa c —,CE-. 7 t/ oo Pr le a /0:004r.4, P ve- T Q- /i7 Sfp�io✓linJ Lcr�L AT /JlA.ti/1K/M flln•a.Uf of �/AE 06E1GD2C Y! LL e ,95 _ 2v Fr. I's G/rre)w iyl� .�cc�iou N orc F-r u• %DOA TjlE+jl � t4V,,,U& 211" kGP i-�Ohdl AX.w 50*. /5to3- La, ^rGC� ura/co (i J7�t . �Y N Yv'CQ. /oLCGIGt! w�v Y"'01 ' 'TT 7 -1w 2 w,, R c O 2q RCP L%n22 bFc�da -, 15-eO3 yD W �z ros• oKO 1 e- aAd m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT N D14M:i:\y1* STREET LOCATION: XORWI7T4r01:N DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: TELEPHONE: 7 z•t/oo A« MUCAI AC77v/ak /v:l 6eojen r.�ater a -17 on w r c o jot o , vE 41.NOE5K am wo wsoer.Wc.) 1rhL2 D/.O 7p1W6C 4' roA /g" RCP fbA �r 2 s /.z is 1� s7* . a t eo 7F3,1040 /B" /Q•C.� 6eg-)-, &er1) /ayk-W g-7C. 12 f39 10'0256- 54V BU,/drr5 5el e-/ no E-c l'o p4la n e 4w Lamle qr- ,e- w ," x 5 v /CE 2740 RE%►rfliMJx ETL C67- - c v- 6,,-a de- -6 Ae /S ".¢c 0 /ecr^j c.9yev , , [�/�z'l 4y S7)4 . /z r 35` fD 4- • 1o7 50 . 8.9 � ct .-' 76�'s run 9J� = y, fur In 4f 12--t,39 a r,' u ' e /07`x• oo �;;✓./ 6 /rucfvrs Aas Q x 6a,'dtr eri-G afi ' ,S/•k, �fcr�5 bce••� bu,lf at- a.Q /oca.tir�,.s. L�o.,crcK c�cc{u /roe /rX.,: � /c/ • �tK 7/ ,� co.uyoa b., cs on ,Cc r 441 s . rebar 7b irl />rs ',Jf cone. /ooao -. JLaa are arf STri . 49 f2S em L( TLlJO ,4AE 147- S7"s4 /i5 t 90 • /20/Jo /L 72, 6E Z</ GT• 6-140E YcWE oo• CURB 7a Fr9cE or- Cc4/¢6 . Su¢u" Srr4Cl2� 66VE5 Lv. =ONQ A7` L/c f'Y f34cF 7D 4i cer.4� P- 7/L dr- IA14&ZS • 1 L3ELtE!/E SGaUEr7o e //vTEX1014 r w 77.IE 3' 6" c•, /OE RoLCEb c.u/z.s cs`77rl,ro. LVrric.0 .STiti -lE3 F79CE G1.� Gu.¢6 /s L�7isl,� Z i`t- fjpoin iDE u alre rA e./. e5 rrcn 9roun0 74ei�, /.rr7l�+r9 , a•f rs( ntw bcK es . .r o.�1J �7�/'`�r� �/( ,S7Gj wl� t r<b/P �i /y1a a•n�. :.,s �{.� �( 3/�'. c.+ .OE' RvGcE?l C uR.6 73 AGCwnaO LS4rrs 8�q/ao 77-/E (,V) bores /placed Fr�tray�8/� weer wbr,eed 0'7 7bd F B -/ Bare (2) are 21 LF aad (2) 6rt //v LL. %ht c •ir33 fhaSe L-A ccs were mcd _ encreFc is SYhed� led tp,ho/rDw 4fb6,g Qnal reber *ed. C 1 L. ,a- i �SfJP >4M 41r C.'vil Consir zhis i9 drgcn'^ 4 -1 Fie f/ a1 v 4fe ,ct , U,-eV- m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: 'TELEPHONE: 7-73 -01 I3 /Ay ��+ /'ssurd /�ycmz{urtly Mice 3 CEO l�xl'% mQ47 An r;94 A{en QCCt�itcf . �SQarc�ia tv,71 COUn/-e+ 7b S&v cvfti"F happaneer, 7--31 o/ �Sout/a/ ( 1'9VIA14 GO7�7),vUEs Z Off, iAI& 6,45,E /4 CneWC . /.A v a/G nroT 7g4 ,F- e(- EYr GvE-l-K AA v ,i/�14E7c77o Sc�ta5v 771E FXQ tac T7- /is k/6E1C . B - / -a/ f%oorouea(• Ime/ /jrudG/ , Hess caa/✓ac Z;") Bross 77�� Gave i6e oll. --, ,6r -h,►,. fro w 4 a 4w CQr /P�fiy�s wt�[ MadC, ,OlAl I- N6 A 775 c A! �I C,/ O-,rlf e )cI� MUST QE S cu7- 7b 4- NEB oz(2E. y,f sccrxo-) 8'Z-Dl aAl PRu/Al6 ON 5,7r V,AJ6. &/ - f�t/YYaI.OSS. Koff'. /lily/ SQPri�iYe�7F �ir�re f-,i iri. 8- 6,--0( (o y07Y7 o,+.o AKrvcs 1�e"- 9-g -61 S/6wc /,v5n9cc.El7. S77a Aw,q.n1G S./+i•!%S -lU be / a�'sed -/o grade so ,Seu, e--4 tie 4^M awl aV,- duec(• 'eEfxO."dw A?-- /O - /-ol SC"&W r8ir7"6? j6&&,4v o lyas hL7u,:Lrx 2{ -aub/e C.,iA t�r ai• CornPC'CSSor s`o/ a(( 4-h ! U es frrJ Uas PLt /lrnc/ Q vyi a.x �C(/ 7 v�u7i /�7c 8j1 ke g47 ete ". /!tea /C i� 74lS t /JaSSec(• l¢+V�47'-- er,ld (Uarr4ae /I SChIC(r /49 ,ne //eW . lo-Z -6/ Peso &•' SC41•er -/-es-/s heuC ta4SSed. Vigeo 1S,5ChedUed evv�,+ o, .� ,vi4t Oe4c - A's77 u C &�[ /&yeo ocro�r / 1 01,gJ 6, -ec(!� Cjh /i0U) ;�S /g ed �"T m14429 `Todd Baumbach - Oakley subdivision age 1 From: Tamara Oneal To: Todd Baumbach Date: 6/21/01 4:09P M Subject: Oakley subdivision The revised pad elevations as proposed for parcels 3 & 4 on drawing 6075 -G are acceptable per Mark Hoffman, the project planner. Engineering has no comments or requests regarding the elevations. All is well. Tamara ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City 0f Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Encinitas Subdivision Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FRONT: Field operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. U7 Cir Name of Project 0Ak q 5upDlyl5I'0 J 7 -w 1 -at-ce 13 a l�cact Name of Developer fC OU OAKLEf --, i (/'7 site location pea Ce/5 / Z , 3 4nd re/�as{d eiiar (address ...number ... street name ._suffix) (lot) (bldg) I have inspected the grading at the subject site and have verified certification of the pad by the Engineer of work, lovi RY , dated 6 8 - - ol, and certification of soil compaction by the Soil Engineer, 2v1 dated 7 �� . I am hereby satisfied that the rough grading has beet co pleted in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, Chapter 23.24 of the Municipal Code, and any other applicable engineering standards and Specific project requirements. Based on my observation and the certifications, I take no exception to the issuance of a building permit for the lotls) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading ILE., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if appropiate) Reference: Building Permit No. - -- /0 -- 2 - -- 0/ (Date) (Ddte) Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. 1SG /field3.docl TEL 760 - 633 -2600 / FAx 760- 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas. California 72024 -3633 TDD 760- 633 -2700 1� recycled paper SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS PLANNERS - SURVEYORS I... R. F.,P. F. Rarry I.. Munn, P.E. Gordon 1.. McElroy, P.L.S. laurie Simon, Principal Fanner L�JrMJZ CIVIL ENGINEERING June 8, 1001 Engj. nn, SWeec /��,e�p,.smv ! VL 1 E COWFEN EllR As Si¢ Develo{manl Arulrsls °ndinjPI., City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave, S,.a, Wwr Lira Plmi Encinitas, Co 92024 Nyaminyynlyawllrr cnma„�ran Aemini.uris Paw hlaIm Re: Engineer's Pod Certification for Project No. 98 -139 TM and nlRea Fuendr En"nron Grading Permit Number 6075 —G LAND PLANNING Pursuant to section 23.24.310 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Pre Acgmnlion Analysis Certification Letter for lots 1 through and including 4. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project. O C ° "`"I°""' I hereby state rough for these units has been completed in conformance with the attached plans and grading requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. Govnmmem Rclubm Lend Dn mm� 23.24.310 (B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved Tcnalivc Maps Major L)W Pcrmils grading plan: S,minc Plans Rcmnng Pad Elevation Pad Elevation Lot No. Per plan Per field measurement Ad.0 "m °" "` Pm."' 1 235.0 235.0 2 240.0 240.0 3 218.0 219.5 4 212.0 214.8 LAND SURVEYING Pn o, suvsys T°,o,rayh,,.l 5.rvcy1 23.24.310 (B)1. Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices and /or retaining wall have Con.,... Slaking been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. R.ones "1 Survey USA npi 23.24.310 (B)5. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. F menl. NogNCCnirc.lirm. 23.24.310 (B)6. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field cad•s..l s.rvryr verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. PNgngr.mmrnric SUrve]s QR�ESS<ON Si °`�ly'�.� `4��y�11 R. Fp fi �F �•� y Z Ivan d Fox W C 381 t" President Cr r*t IRF /ce Ls'l CNIL �! �TEOF CALiF�a (76o) 7535525 • FAx (760) 943 -8236 4407 Manchester Avenue • Suite 105 • Encinitas, California 92024 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. July 19, 2000 Project No. CE -6104 Roy Oakley 2171 Pavilion Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Subject: Report of Certification of Compacted Fill Ground Oakley Subdivision TPM -98 -139 Wildflower Drive Encinitas, California Dear Mr. Oakley: In response to your request, the following report has been prepared to indicate results of soil testing, observations, and inspection of earthwork construction at the subject site. Testing and inspection services were performed from May 4, 2000 through June 27, 2000. Briefly, our findings reveal filled ground has been compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90 %). Therefore, we recommend construction continue as scheduled. Our firm was retained to observe grading operations with regard to current standard practices and to determine the degree of compaction of placed fill. Grading operations were performed by Greg Whillock Grading of Vista, California. Reference is made to the following soils reports and project plans. l.) "Geotechnical Investigation" prepared by Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., dated May 24, 1989 2.) "Rippability Analysis ", Deep Sewer Trench, prepared by Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., dated May 21, 1990 3.) "Update Report prepared by Southern California Soil Testing, Inc., dated May 20, 1999 P. O. BOX 302002 * ESCONDIDO, CA 92030 * (760)180 -1116 FAX (760)741 -6568 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6104 Page 2 4.) "Grading Plan" prepared by San Dieguito Engineering, Inc., approved April 3, 2000 5.) "Change of Soils Engineer" letter prepared by North County Compaction Engineering, Inc., dated May 11, 2000. Approximate locations and depth of filled ground and extent of earthwork construction covered in this report are indicated on the attached Plate No. One entitled, "Test Location Sketch ". Subdivision grading operations were performed to construct four (4) level building pads and the road extension of Wildflower Drive. Should the finished building pads be altered in any way, we should be contacted to provide additional recommendations. The site was graded in accordance with Reference No. I & No. 3. However, due to the large quantity of on -site expansive soils, selective grading could not be performed to assure the building pads were capped with select soils containing low expansion potential. Therefore, special foundation design considerations will be required with regard to this characteristic. The site was graded to conform to the project grading plan (Reference No. 4). Actual pad size and elevation may differ. Finish grade operations are to be completed at a later date. Representative soils samples were collected and returned to the laboratory for testing. The following tests were performed and are tabulated on the attached Plate No. Three. 1. Optimum Moisture/Maximum Density (ASTM D -1557) 2. Expansion Potential Test (FHA Standard) 3. Direct Shear (ASTM D -3080) K131614161a11111 alm,. Native soils encountered were clayey - sands, sandy -clays and silty- clays. Fill soils were generated from on -site excavation. The building site contained a transition from cut to till. However, cut areas located within the building area were over excavated a minimum of 4 feet and brought to grade with compacted soil. Undercutting was tamed throughout the realm of the entire building pads. NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6104 Page 3 On -site soils were found to have an expansion index varying between 44 and 132 and are classified as being low to very high in expansion potential. Due to the majority of on -site soils possessing moderate to high expansion potential, selective grading could not be performed. Therefore special foundation recommendations will be required with regard to this soil condition. The key -ways were approximately 20 feet in width and varied between 2 to 4 feet in depth, and inclined into the slope. During earthwork construction, native areas to receive fill were scarified, watered, and compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90 %) of maximum density. Subsequent fill soils were placed, watered, and compacted in 6 inch lips. Benches were constructed in natural ground at intermediate levels to properly support the fill. To determine the degree of compaction, field density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D-1556 or D -2922 at the approximate horizontal locations designated on the attached Plate No. One entitled, "Test Location Sketch ". A tabulation of test results and their vertical locations are presented on the attached Plate No. Two entitled "Tabulation of Test Results ". Fill soils found to have a relative compaction of less the ninety percent (90 %) were reworked until proper compaction was achieved 3-Mliald _ 1310 1 1 1 Continuous inspection was not requested to verify fill soils are placed in accordance with current standard practices regarding grading operations and earthwork construction. Therefore, as economically feasible as possible, part-time inspection was provided. Hence, the following recommendations are based on the assumption that all areas tested are representative of the entire project. 1.) Compacted fill and natural ground within the defined building areas have adequate strength to safely support the proposed loads. 2.) Slopes may be considered stable with relation to deep seated failure provided they are properly maintained. Slopes should be planted with light groundcover (no gorilla ice plant) indigenous to the area. Drainage should be diverted away from the slopes to prevent water flowing on the face of slope. This will reduce the probability of failure as a result of erosion. 3.) In our opinion, soil liquefaction at the site is unlikely to occur due to the following on -site soils conditions: NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6104 Page 4 A). Groundwater was not encountered at the time of grading. B). Loose compressible topsoils were removed to firm native ground and recompacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90 %) of maximum dry density. Q. The dense nature of the formation underlying the site. D). On -site soils possess relatively high cohesion characteristics. 4.) Continuous footings having a minimum width of 12 inches and founded a minimum of 24 inches below lowest adjacent grade, will have an estimated allowable bearing value of 1200 pounds per square foot. 5.) Footings located on or adjacent to slopes should be founded at a depth such that the horizontal distance from the bottom outside face of footing to the face of the slope is a minimum of 8 feet. 6.) Plumbing trenches should be backfilled with a non - expansive soil having a swell of less than two percent (2 %) and a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Backfill soils should be inspected and compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90 %). 7.) Unless requested, recommendations for future improvements (additions, pools, recreation slabs, additional grading, etc.) Were not included in this report. Prior to construction, we should be contacted to update conditions and provide additional recommendations. 8.) Completion of grading operations was left at rough grade. Therefore, we recommend a landscape architect be contacted to provide finish grade and drainage recommendations. Drainage recommendations should include a two percent (2 %) minimum fall away from all foundation zones. 9.) Prior to construction of the proposed pool, the pool contractor should be contacted for concrete and reinforcement design. Pool excavation spoil should be hauled off -site or properly placed on site under the supervision of our firm. The pool should be designed with an expansive soil schedule. 10.) Expansive soils conditions observed during grading operations will require special recommendations to reduce structural damage occurring from excessive subgrade and foundation movement. NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6104 Page 5 Recommendations set forth will reduce the probability of future damage and should be strictly adhered to: All continuous footings should be founded a minimum of 24 inches below lowest adjacent grade and be reinforced with two #5 bars top and bottom (total of 4 bars). Steel should be positioned 3 inches above bottom of footing and 3 inches below top of footing. Isolated square footings should also be founded a minimum of 24 inches below lowest adjacent grade and have a minimum diameter of 24 inches. Isolated footings should also be interconnected with continuous footings to reduce the possibility of footing rotation. Interior slabs should be a minimum of 5 inches thick and reinforced with #3 bars on 18 inch centers each ways. Slab reinforcement should be placed near the center of slab and extended through joints to provide a tension tie with perimeter footings. Garage slabs should be free floating. Slab underlayment should consist of visqueen installed at mid -point within a 4 inch sand barrier (2 inches sand, visqueen, 2 inches sand). Sand should be tested in accordance with ASTM D -2419 to insure a minimum sand equivalent of 30. All foundation concrete should have a minimum compressive strength of 2500 psi. Clayey soils should not be allowed to dry prior to placing concrete. They should be watered to insure they are kept in a very moist condition or at a moisture content exceeding optimum moisture content by a minimum of five percent (5 %). Prior to pouring of concrete, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. should be contacted to inspect foundation recommendations for compliance to those set forth. During placement of concrete North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. and/or a qualified concrete inspector should be present to document construction of foundations. POST - TENSION SLAB AND FOUNDATION An alternative construction method to the above expansive soils recommendations would be to have the slab designed as a post- tension concrete system. The design should be performed by a licensed engineer engaged in this type of design and who has a minimum of 5 years experience, A post- tension design may prove to be cost effective. In the event it is decided to utilize a post - tension system, additional laboratory testing will be required to provide the proper design criteria. This will incur an additional cost of $505.00 for providing this service. NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE -6104 Page 6 LU041 313 1&1 l"KICtIX91 i 1 In the event foundation excavation and steel placement inspection is required and/or requested, an additional cost of $170.00 will be invoiced to perform the field inspection and prepare a "Final Conformance Letter ". If foundations are constructed in more than one phase, $120.00 for each additional inspection will be invoiced. It is the responsibility of the owner and/or his representative to carry our recommendations set forth in this report. San Diego County is located in a high risk area with regard to earthquake. Earthquake resistant projects are economically unfeasible. Therefore, damage as a result of earthquake is probable and we assume no liability. We assume the on -site safety of our personnel only. We cannot assume liability of personnel other than our own, It is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to insure construction operations are conducted in a safe manner and in conformance with regulations governed by CAL -OSHA and/or local agencies. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President a=. cc: (3) submitted �QOFESS /p\ R. qFG, S(�, No. 713 x . 910/01 \�7 Dale R. C Registered &ft'e - 93 Geotechnical Engineer 000713 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL TESTING ® T� PARCEL I & 2 P 'S NO SCALE OAKLEY SUBDIVISION WILDFLOWER DRIVE J "rr O �, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA o/ ,/ !+ 939 162 88 TE# /04 9� /64TEST r � ,I 1106 �d as1�Id� o , u I U/ I t .•. �a ;d J2 ob �S Id (b iii \ n 4, .d •, =\ /50 151 0 �a y no77lI r/ I r 'w 95 DIZO 92/0! M1 X869 Rp ac LO.e+s 114 E 91460,b 14$TEST 167 166 !15 14:�ti 140 /18 119TEST 116 a /l/ //0 ;r 165 117 ,, ^ /, r r l 113112 6z 61 6058' -r Mx � l TEST LOCATION SKETCH PROJECT No. CE -6104 PLATE No. ONE t / /4 Ij NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION[ ENGINEERING, INC. © � SOIL TESTING PARCEL 3 S 4 NO SCALE OAKLEY SUBDIVISION WILDFLOWER DRIVE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 5`q�_ N 2,9 + II 11 .t i 1 lr i• 1 .p 1' I�:•� 1 r. I TEST /-2 �4/ 139�; + R r U w 141 >b 42 29 �;� I,•.., 170% X77 r 13 /42 71 '%6 21 � t %TEST l2/ �68 4,3 76 ztd 3 144' 123 J 74 r r 168 69 37,- 22 Z m' ' 36T ST 31 r' + 1, : n 1 I - -' iii r � _ 'i.. :.<<•` ..� � __ -_J. �.'%' ! /� !r \e: �:.. 0FEn GtlYE A77, t ST \ \, /24 J! +.' �- F. + \ ZIZ ea ' ! �/1�([�pp+q !1'' !' j /•.701 r \;. �• \ r y'/7 '126 ! ; tin 44 !p• + $��. \ =I�i3 TfiST \' ♦ K 127 r: y 504 38 28 w r f 16f.16,1�" J _ 1 TEST LOCATION SKETCH PROJECT No. CE -6104 PLATE No. ONE 'A' NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS Test k Date Horizontal Vertical I Field Moisture Dry Density I Soil I Percent of 2 Location Location %Dry Wt. LB Cu. Ft. Type Compaction 1 05/09/00 See 200.0 16.6 11t.4 I W. / 2 Plate 202.0 15.8 110.9 I 90.3 3 One 203.5 152 114.4 1 93.2 4 201.5 14.3 110.6 1 90.1 5 203.5 14.5 113.0 I 92.0 6 205.0 14.7 112.1 1 91.3 7 207.0 14.5 113.6 1 92.5 8 204.5 15.3 110.8 I 90.3 9 05/10100 202.0 18.6 106.8 II 90.3 10 204.0 17.7 108.0 11 91.3 11 205.0 16.8 110.0 11 93.0 12 206.0 19.3 106.4 11 90.0 13 205.0 16.9 110.6 I 90.1 14 206.5 15.1 110.5 I 90.0 15 205.5 16.7 110.9 1 903 16 206.0 14.3 111.6 I 90.9 17 207.5 15.8 111.9 I 91.1 18 203.5 17.0 108.2 11 91.5 19 205.5 15.8 109.9 II 92.9 20 208.5 16.0 111.7 1 91.0 21 " 208.5 14.2 115.6 I 94.2 22 209.5 15.3 112.2 1 91.4 23 05 /11 /00 207.5 17.4 106.5 II 90.1 24 " 209.5 16.6 106.8 ❑ 90.3 25 " 209.0 17.7 108.3 11 91.6 26 211.0 13.0 106.6 111 90.1 27 213.0 13.3 103.4 III 87.4' 28 " 213.0 16.2 107.5 III 90.8 29 210.0 17.7 110.6 IV 90.2 30 212.0 17.6 112.0 IV 91.4 31 213.0 16.9 111.4 IV 90.9 32 05115/00 214.0 16.9 112.9 IV 92.1 33 215.0 14.6 114.4 IV 93.3 34 213.5 15.8 115.9 IV 94.6 35 215.0 15.6 114.43 IV 93.3 36 214.0 18.3 107.8 111 91.1 37 215.0 17.6 109.1 III 922 38 214.0 17.4 109.8 III 92.8 39 216.0 16.1 110.1 111 93.0 REMARKS: See Remarks on Plate No. Two, page 5 PROJECT NO. CE -6104 PLATE NO. TWO NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS Test # Date Horizontal Vertical Field Moisture Dry Density Soil I Percent of I 41 Location Location % Dry Wt. LB Cu. Ft. Type Compaction 40 05/16100 See 216.0 19.0 106.6 III 90.1 41 Plate 213.0 18.2 107.1 1II 90.5 42 One 214.0 15.4 , 107.7 111 91.0 43 215.0 19.0 106.7 III 90.1 44 217.0 18.8 106.9 111 90.3 45 219.0 15.9 111.2 IV 90.7 46 218.0 14.7 112.3 II 95.0 47 220.0 15.6 112.0 II 94.7 48 05/17/00 224.5 17.7 110.9 IV 90.5 49 226.5 18.3 110.6 IV 90.2 50 227.0 16.8 110.4 IV 90.1 51 05/18/00 204.5 14.4 112.4 I 91.6 52 206.5 15.6 113.6 I 92.5 53 205.5 14.4 111.7 I 91.0 54 207.5 13.3 112.0 1 91.2 55 226.0 14.6 111.5 I 90.8 56 228.0 15.4 112.1 II 94.8 57 229.0 13.1 113.3 I 92.3 58 231.0 14.1 112.4 II 95.0 59 235.0 15.8 108.8 III 91.9 60 237.0 17.4 109.6 111 92.6 61 234.5 18.4 110.6 11I 93.4 62 235.5 15.5 111.4 III 94.1 63 237.5 18.6 109.0 III 92.1 64 05/19/00 230.0 18.6 110,9 IV 90.5 65 231.0 16.4 111.7 IV 91.1 66 232.0 17.5 113.6 IV 92.7 67 05/22100 213.0 15.3 1116 V 90.3 68 " 215.5 15.9 112.4 V 90.2 69 05/23/00 215.0 181 108.8 VI 90.0 70 216.0 17.4 110.2 VI 91.2 71 213.0 16.7 109.0 VI 90.2 72 214.0 15.6 1117 V 90.4 73 05/25/00 214.5 14.3 115.2 V 92.4 74 216.0 15.7 113.6 V 911 75 215.0 17.6 111.1 VI 91.9 REMARKS: See Remarks on Plate No. Two, page 5 PROJECT NO. CE -6104 PLATE NO. TWO (page 2) NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. o All w1vire-Mrsm Test # Date Horizontal Vertical I Field Moisture I Dry Density Soil Percent of IType 77 Location Location % Dry Wt. LB Cu. Ft. VI Compaction 76 05/25/00 See 216.0 19.2 114.3 VI 94.6 77 Plate 217.0 15.6 115.4 VI 95.5 78 One 218.0 17.3 110.7 VI 91.6 79 220.0 23.7 103.6 III 87.5' 80 220.0 16.8 109.9 111 92.8 81 222.0 15.4 112.7 III 95.2 82 223.0 16.1 109.7 III 92.7 83 217.0 15.5 112.6 III 94.6 84 " 219.0 14.4 113.0 III 95.5 35 05 /26100 224.0 17.5 107.8 III 91.1 86 225.0 17.9 108.6 III 91.8 87 224.0 16.7 107.6 III 90.9 88 226.0 19.0 106.8 III 90.2 89 225.0 17.0 107.0 III 90.4 90 226.0 17.4 109.6 III 92.6 91 05/30/00 227.0 20.4 106.8 1II 90.2 92 229.0 17.2 113.8 IV 92.8 93 227.0 17.6 112.0 IV 91.4 94 229.0 15.8 106.5 III 90.0 95 05/31/00 226.0 18.8 109.8 VI 90.8 96 228.0 20.8 104.4 VI 86.4• 97 228.0 17.3 110.7 VI 91.6 98 2290 22.5 102.8 VI 85.0' 99 229.0 15.6 111.4 VI 92.2 100 06/01/00 230.0 16.9 110.6 VI 91.5 101 231.0 16.5 109.4 Vl 90.5 102 230.0 18.0 109.4 VI 90.5 103 232.0 15.8 112.6 VI 93.2 104 232.0 17.2 109.7 VI 90.8 105 233.0 18.1 108.8 VI 90.0 106 06/02/00 233.0 14.8 117.3 VI 9TI 107 235.0 17.0 111.6 VI 92.3 108 234.0 16.6 113.4 VI 93.3 109 235.0 19.0 109.2 VI 90.3 *REMARKS. See remarks on Plate No. Two, page 5 PROJECT NO. CE -6104 PLATE NO. TWO (Page 3) NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS Test # Date Horizontal Vertical I Field Moisture Dry Density I Soil Percent of 111 Location Location %Dry Wt. LB Cu. Ft. Type Compaction 110 06/05/00 See 234.0 16.8 110.5 VI 91.4 111 Plate 236.0 16.4 111.4 VI 92.2 112 " One 234.0 16.9 109.3 Vll 90.0 113 " 236.0 16.5 109.6 VII 90.2 114 06/06/0 233.0 16.3 112.0 Vll 92.2 115 235.0 16.4 113.4 VU 93.4 116 238.0 16.1 114.2 VI 94.5 117 239.0 16.2 115.6 VI 95.6 118 237.0 16.9 109.8 VII 90.4 119 239.0 15.3 1101 VII 90.7 120 06/07/00 216.0 17.8 110.0 111 92.9 121 218.0 17.0 113.4 111 95.8 122 216.0 15.4 110.2 VI 91.2 123 218.0 16.2 109.5 VI 90.6 124 209.5 15.2 114.7 V 92.0 125 211.0 16.7 113.8 V 91.3 126 210.0 16.2 112.5 V 90.2 127 211.0 14.4 112.9 V 90.6 128 06/08/00 212.0 15.3 114.0 VI 94.3 129 213.0 15.7 113.6 VI 94.0 130 206.0 17.1 109.4 VI 90.5 131 208.0 15.6 109.5 VI 90.6 132 206.0 18.7 107.6 III 90.9 133 207.0 18.4 108.3 III 91.5 134 06/09/00 213.0 19.7 108.8 VI 90.0 135 " 213.0 17.0 109.4 VI 90.5 136 212.0 17.8 112.9 VI 93.4 137 213.0 153 114.9 VI 95.1 138 06/12100 213.0 17.0 109.7 VI 90.8 139 238.0 17.4 109.9 VII 90.5 140 238.0 19.6 109.4 VII 90.1 141 06113/00 217.0 18.3 109.5 VII 90.1 142 218.0 16.7 110.4 VII 90.6 143 218.0 17.7 111.6 VII 91.9 144 219.0 15.0 112.0 VII 92.2 145 237.0 17.7 109.6 VI 90.7 146 239.0 19.2 108.9 VI 90.1 147 238.0 19.0 109.0 VI 90.2 `REMARKS: See Remarks on Plate No Two, page 5 PROJECT NO. CE -6103 PLATE NO. TWO (page 4) NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS Test # Date Horizontal Vertical I Field Moisture I Dry Density I Soil I Percent of 149 Location Location % Dry Wt. LB Cu. Ft. Type Compaction 148 06/16/00 See 227.0 16.6 108.7 Q 91.9 149 Plate 229.0 15.6 110.1 U 93.1 150 One 230.0 16.3. 110.7 II 93.6 151 231.0 14.6 112.6 11 95.2 152 06/19/00 201.5 15.4 114.2 I 93.0 153 203.5 16.6 113.0 1 92.0 154 204.0 15.8 114.4 I 93.2 155 231.0 165 110.7 VI 91.6 156 232.0 173 111.4 VI 92.2 157 232.5 17.0 113.2 1 92.3 158 06/20/00 204.0 15.7 117.3 VI 97.1 159 205.5 16.8 114.3 VI 94.6 160 204.5 17.1 113.0 VI 93.5 161 206.5 16.6 112.4 VI 93.0 162 06/27/00 235.5 RFG 15.2 110.7 VI 91.6 163 235.5 RFG 10.8 1121 VI 92.8 164 236.0 RFG 14.3 110.4 VI 91.3 165 " 239.5 RFG 10.7 113.4 VI 93.8 166 240.0 RFG 13.0 115.6 VI 95.6 167 240.0 RFG 10.4 113.7 VI 94.1 168 219.0 RFG 12.0 116.9 IV 95.4 169 220.0 RFG 11.0 110.7 IV 90.3 170 220.0 RFG 10.0 117.8 IV 96.1 171 06/27/00 RSG 12.6 111.6 1 90.9 172 RSG 10.4 110.7 1 90.2 173 RSG 09.6 109.2 VI 90.3 174 RSG 10.7 111.1 VI 91.9 175 215.0 RFG 10.0 111.7 IV 91.1 176 215.0 RFG 09.0 112.3 IV 91.6 177 215.0 RFG 08.8 1 10.8 IV 90.4 REMARKS: RFG = Rough Finish Grade RSG = Rough Sub Grade Test No. 28 is a retest of Test No. 27 Test No. 80 is a retest of Test No. 79 Test No. 97 is a retest of Test No. 96 Test No. 99 is a retest of Test No. 98 PROJECT NO. CE -6104 PLATEN 0. TN*'O (page 5) M � NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS OPTIMUM MOISTURE/MA_MIUM SO 11, DES . IPTION TYPE DENSITY OPT. MOISTURE MAX. DRY DENSITY V VI LLB, CU. FT) (% DRY WT) Tan Brown Silty Sandy -Clay I 122.7 11.7 Dark Brown Silty Sandy -Clay II 118.2 13.2 Casey Brown Silty Clayey -Sand III 118.3 14.3 Tan Brown Silty Sandy -Clay IV 122.5 14.1 Casey Tan Silty Clayey -Sand V 124.6 11.1 Tan Beige Silty Clayey -Sand VI 120.8 14.4 Tan Silty Very Fine Clavey -Sand VII 121.4 12.5 SAMPLE Nn I II IV V VI VII CONDITION Remold 90% Remold 90% Remold 90% Remold 90% Remold 90% Remold 90% INITIAL. MOISTURE ( %) 11.8 13.7 14.0 11.2 13.9 12.6 AIR DRY MOISTURE (%) 8.0 6.6 9.6 5.4 9.4 9.1 FINAL MOISTURE ( %) 25.5 25.8 25.2 18.1 22.2 26.2 DRY DENSITY (PCF) 110.4 106.4 110.3 112.1 108.7 109.6 LOAD (PSF) 150 150 150 150 150 150 SWELL ( %) 12.7 13.2 11.2 4.7 4.4 8.0 EXPANSION INDEX 127 132 112 47 44 80 SAMPLE Nn VI VII CONDITION Remold 900/c Remold 90% ANGLE INTERNAL FRICTION 13 20 COHESION INTERCEPT (PCF) 290 260 PROJECT NO. CE -6104 PLATE NO. THREE NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. December 14, Project No. CE -61-61 04 Roy Oakley 2171 Pavilion Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Subject: Report of Soil Compaction Sewer Line Trench, Water Line Trench, Storm Drain Trench, Joint Trench, Road Finish Subgrade Soils and Base Materials, Curb & Gutter Finish Subgrade Soils and Base Materials Oakley Subdivision, TPM 98 -139 Wildflower Drive Encinitas, California Dear Mr. Oakley: In response to your request, we are sending herewith results of laboratory and compaction tests performed on miscellaneous utility trench backfill soils and road improvements at the subject project. Test results indicate that utility backfill soils, roadway /curb and gutter finish subgrade soils and base materials were compacted to the minimtun specifications required by their governing agencies. Type, location and minimum required compaction of test is specified under remarks of attached Plate No. One. Therefore, we recommend construction continue as scheduled. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President RKA:paJ cc: (4) submitted Glr� Dale R. Re, Registered Geotechnic P. 0. BOX 302002 ` E5WNDIDO, CA 92030 ` (760)480 -1116 FAX (760)741 -6668 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS Test # Date Horizontal Vertical Field Moisture I Dry Density I Soil I Percent of 179 Location Location %Dry Wt. LB Cu. Ft Type Compaction 178 07/17/00 43+00 232.0 16.1 109.4 VI 905 179 43+00 230.0 162 111.2 VI 92.0 180 45+00 229.0 13.5 119.2 V 95.6 181 45+00 230.0 14.7 114.2 V 91.6 182 07/19/00 12+80 227.0 15.0 111.3 VII 91.6 183 12+80 229.0 13.5 110.7 VII 91.1 184 11 +95 232.0 15.9 110.5 VII 91.0 185 07/19/00 11 +95 233.0 15.0 109.9 Vil 90.5 186 47+00 220.0 13.2 119.5 V 95.9 187 47+00 222.0 13.3 122.1 V 97.9 188 48+80 206.0 13.9 1218 V 977 189 48+80 207.0 11.9 119.8 V 96.1 190 08/01/00 12+90 225.0 16.4 110.0 VI 91.0 191 12+90 227.0 15.6 110.2 VI 91.2 192 10+80 231.0 15.9 109.9 VI 90.9 193 10+80 234.0 15.8 111.4 VI 92.2 194 08/02/00 13+20 222.0 14.2 110.6 VI 91.5 195 1. 13+20 223.0 131 112.2 VI 92.8 196 08103/00 14+00 217.0 12.9 112.5 VI 93.1 197 14+00 219.0 14.1 111.0 Vl 91.8 198 15+60 209.0 14.5 112.4 V1 93.8 199 15+80 209.0 13.9 113.3 VI 93.7 200 08/08/00 48+95 200.0 10.7 113.6 VIB 90.1 201 47+70 210.5 09.2 113.9 VIll 903 202 46+50 218.0 11.8 114.9 VIII 91.1 203 08/09/00 45 +50 222.0 11.9 113.6 VIII 90.1 204 44+60 226.0 12.6 114.0 VIII 90.4 205 43+50 228.0 11.5 114.4 Vlll 90.7 206 08/14/00 43 +50 230.0 08.4 113.4 VIII 90.0 207 44+50 226.0 12.7 114.3 VIII 90.7 208 45 +40 224.5 116 114.2 VIII 90.6 209 46+50 219.0 10.8 114.8 VIII 91.1 210 47+30 214.0 101 114.0 VIII 90.4 211 48+30 210.5 12.5 118.3 VIll 93.8 212 49+00 203.5 14.4 115.1 VIII 91.3 REMARKS. Test No.'s I thru 177 presented in prior reports Test No.'s 178 thru 181 & 186 thru 189 taken on sewer main, Wildflower Dr. (private), 90% required Test No.'s 182 thru 185 taken on private sewer lateral on Wildflower Dr., 90% required Test No.'s 190 thru 199 taken on storm drain backfills, Wildflower Dr., 900/9 required Test No.'s 200 thru 212 taken on water main pipe bedding on Wildflower Dr., 900/6 required PROJECT NO. CE -6104 PLATE NO. ONE NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING. INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS Test k Date Horizontal Vertical I Field Moisture Dry Density Soil I Percent of I 214 Location Location % Dry Wt. LB Cu. Ft Type Compaction 213 08/15/00 16 +37 208.0 14.0 114.4 VI 947 214 49+30 205.0 13.8 113.7 VI 94.1 215 49+30 205.5 12.9 113.9 VI 94.2 216 49+30 203.0 14.2 111.2 VI 92.0 217 08/17/00 45+ 10 227.5 14.4 110.8 VI 91.7 218 46+00 223.5 15.4 110.4 VI 91.3 219 47+00 217.0 14.4 109.0 VI 90.2 220 48+20 209.0 12.4 113.0 VI 93.5 221 08/24/00 43 +50 233.0 14.4 112.5 VI 93.1 222 44+50 230.0 13.9 1115 VI 93.9 223 45+00 229.0 12.8 1114 VI 93.8 224 43 +95 230.0 13.6 111.5 VI 92.3 225 11 109100 43 +40 230.0 10.0 118.2 VIII 93.8 226 46+50 219.0 09.0 116.2 VIII 92.2 227 48+00 209.0 10.4 114.6 VIII 90.9 228 49+50 202.0 09.8 119.9 VIII 95.1 229 30 +00 191.0 10.1 113.4 VIII 90.0 230 29+00 183.5 10.5 118.0 VIII 93.6 231 " 45+50 225.0 08.8 114.5 VIII 90.8 232 " 45+50 227.0 14.2 109.5 VII 90.2 233 11/14/00 49 +50 203.0 14.5 115.8 VI 95.8 234 48+00 210.0 17.6 109.7 VI 90.8 235 46 +40 222.0 16.8 110.7 VI 91.6 236 44+04 230.0 18.3 109.8 VI 90.8 237 04/18/01 43+20 FSG 16.6 114.9 VI 95.1 238 44+10 FSG 14.3 117.6 IV 96.0 239 46+02 FSG 16.0 117.6 IV 96.0 240 04/19/01 42+90 FSG 14.4 114.0 H 96.4 241 42+78 FSG 14.5 115.2 II 97.4 242 44+52 FSG 12.3 119.7 IV 97.7 REMARKS: FSG = Finish Sub Grade, 95 % required Test No.'s 213 & 216 taken on storm drain head wall on Wildflower Drive, 90 % required Test No.'s 214 & 215 taken on 2 inch water blow -oft on Wildflower Drive, 90°/. required Test No.'s 217 thru 224 taken on water main backfills on Wildflower Drive, 90% required Test No.'s 225 thru 231 taken on joint trench sand bedding on Wildflower Drive, 90% required Test No.'s 232 thru 236 taken on join trench on Wildflower Drive, 900/6 required Test No.'s 237 thru 242 taken on finish subgrade road section, Wildflower Dr., (private), 95 % req. PROJECT NO. CE -6104 PLATE NO. ONE (page 2) NORTH county COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS Test # Date Horizontal Vertical Field Moisture Dry Density I Soil Percent of 244 Location Location %Dry Wt. LB Cu. Ft. Type Compaction 243 04/19/01 44+02 FSG 14.6 116.9 IV 9).4 244 45+44 FSG 15.5 117.7 IV 96.0 245 45 + 15 FSG 14.7 117.2 IV 95.6 246 46+70 FSG 14.6 117.3 IV 97.1 247 46+90 FSG 15.6 117.6 VI 97.3 248 47+90 FSG 117 118.2 VI 97.8 249 47+90 FSG 15. I 115.9 VI 95.9 250 49+57 FSG 14.8 114.9 VI 95.1 251 49+56 FSG 15.4 115.2 VI 953 252 04/24/01 42+90 FGB 04.8 136.5 IX 98.2 253 42+92 FGB 05.2 134.7 DC 96.9 254 44+94 FGB 06.3 1343 DC 96.6 255 45+10 FGB 065 133.2 IX 95.8 256 46+22 FGB 04.8 132.9 IX 95.6 257 04/14/01 46+55 FGB 06.6 1319 DC 96.3 258 47+61 FGB 05.9 132.1 DC 95.0 259 47+ 56 FGB 05.2 132.9 DC 95.6 260 48+80 FGB 06.0 132.9 IX 95.6 261 49+00 FGB 07.5 134.6 DC 96.8 262 06/25/01 49+56 FSG 12.7 118.3 VI 97.9 263 99+50 FSG 13.8 118.1 VI 97.7 264 99+90 FSG 14.7 117.1 VI 96.7 265 99+ 10 FSG 12.7 118.8 VI 98.3 266 06/26/01 49+75 FGB 05.9 133.9 DC 96.3 267 " 50+ 10 FGB 06.1 134.4 IX 96.6 268 08/01/01 43 + 10 FGB 05.6 135.6 DC 97.5 269 49+50 FGB 05.2 132.6 IX 95.3 270 46+20 FGB 05.3 133.2 DC 95.8 271 47+50 FGB 05.8 132.3 DC 95.1 272 48+60 FGB 05.6 133.4 IX 95.9 273 50+00 FGB 05.2 134.8 IX 96.9 REMARKS: FGB = Finish Grade Base, 95 % minimum required FSG = Finish Sub Grade, 95% minimum required Test No.'s 243, 245, 246, 249, 251 262 and 264 taken on curb & gutter finish subgrade along Wildflower Drive (private) 95% required Test No.'s 244, 247, 248, 250 263 & 265 taken on finish subgrade road section, on Wildflower Drive (private), 95% required Test No.'s 252 - 261, 266 & 267 taken on curb & gutter finish grade base, Wildflower Dr., 95% req Test No.'s 268 - 273 taken on finish grade base for road section, Wildflower Dr., 95 %req PROJECT NO. CE -6104 PLATE NO. ONE (page 3) NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. OPTIMUM MOISTUREIMAXIMUM DENSITY SOIL DESCRIPTION TYPE MAX. DRY DENSITY OPT. MOISTURE (LB. CU. FT) (% DRY WT) Dark Brown Silty Sandy -Clay 11 118.2 13.2 Tan Brown Silty Sandy -Clay IV 122.5 14.1 Grey Tan Silty Clayey -Sand V 124.6 11.1 Tan Beige Silty Clayey -Sand VI 120.8 14.4 Tan Silty Very Fine Clayey -Sand VII 121.4 12.5 White Tan Silty Sand (Import) VM 126.0 10.1 Grey Gravely Silty-Sand Import (Class Il Base) D{ 139.0 06.0 PROJECT NO. CE -6104 PLATE NO. ONE (page 4) NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Roy Oakley 2171 Pavilion Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Subject: Letter of Conformance Proposed Single Family Dwelling Parcel I of Oakley Subdivision TPM 98 -139 Wildflower Drive Encinitas, California Dear Mr. Oakley: January 15,2002 Project No. CE -6104 In response to your request, we have reviewed our previously submitted report dated July 19, 2000 and performed an inspection of the site for adherence to the recommendations set forth. Our site inspection of November 13, 2001 revealed foundation excavations and reinforcement placement was performed in accordance with the recommendations set forth. Recommendations are considered minimal and any in excess of our report should be further inspected by the engineer of work and/or local building authority for their conformance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President RKA:paj cc. (4) submitted E2 P ! 2 4 GE 713 m Cr. Exp- 9/30/05 a 444� CHN\G Dale R. Regli 4'Je O F C AOF 3 Registered Civil En 9393 Geotechnical Engineer 000713 P. 0. 13OX 302002 ' ESCONDIDO, CA 92030 ` (760)180 -1116 FAX (760)741 -6568 CITY OF ENCINITAS 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Eucinitas, CA 92024 -3633 TRANSMITTAL FORM FAX: 633 -2818 Community Development Engineering Fire Administration Fire Prevention Public Works DATE: 5Iz9 f 0% SEND TO FAX # 9SG3- 823!0 r COMPANY: D /EGU/TU //aC�l�� /�C # PP A"ITACHED two FROM: 7DD0 PHONE: 1+9/633- Z%9� ❑ Call ASAP ❑ Review & Call ❑ Review & Return ❑ F.Y.1. ❑ Please Handle TffE , ❑ Per Our Conversation NE /'tea c E,ar7Fi eO I FcT T—' iRU AIEE�- -1b O (-ERnFic A170AI ❑ Please Reply by ❑ As Requested !A! Nvr PgD5 inU sr 6 '.W Pr'CVu�Uns G�e� -I /� O. !b �• Some /Dads Ctre iP�d l%nPC! /anfs m� be C� En 4c -fa of {use SAMPLE Date: City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Engineer's Pad Certification for Project No. 99 -001 TM and Grading Permit Number XXXX - G. Pursuant to section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for lots through and including . As the Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading for these units has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. 23243 10 (B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Pad Elevation Pad Elevation Lot No. Per vlan per field measurement 1 100.00 100.06 2 103.00 102.96 3 100.00 100.09 4 102.00 102.09 23.24.310(B)1. Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices and/or retaining walls have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.310(B)5. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.3 10 (B)6. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The above information shall be on the Engineer of Record's letterhead and shall be signed and seated by the Engineer of Record Padcert.doc SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS PLAN%!V% . SURVEYORS Ivan R. For, P.P. Barry L. Munson, P.E. Gordon L. MaEtmy, P.L.S. Isurw Simon, Principal Planner CIVIL ENGINEERING Englrcrnng 9udiea sllr [k.d�ryurcm Arulyus Impmvrmrnl Rens Druvdr Mms 5rver/WUrr Line Mans Ilydn4ogyMy,lnulx's C,aumAVm Admmimeluu Nvement Rrlabdnnrtm Furtnsn EngiNCnng LAND PLANNING PrtdcymvuonAmlysis LaNI u�r c..nwl�n,n F vwn,rcnW Awlrsn Cmvemment Relalwns L Drvisnn Tmudve Maps Maiur U. Pmolu sprc�flc Mens Rexaming vuunces Adnnm,lnnvc Nmdu Anwomions Bnunduy Adluemrtvs LAND SURVEYING Mupeny Surveys Top nt,h,cel Surveys Cons.'SlaLmg RecnNUd Survey t <ggl Descnpo. subcoun, Maps Fasnmrnl. W"N Cemf mam Thank you, C.IwrY gurvrya San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. Pmmgnmmelnc survey. l Ivan R. Fox President City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 May 24, 2001 SIDE 4460 Subject: Pad Certification Reference: 6075 -G Attention: Mr. Masih Maher, PE Mr. Maher, This is to verify that San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. has surveyed the elevation of the building pads for the referenced project. Lot Plan Elevation Surveyed Elevation 1 235 236 2 240 240 3 218 220 4 212 215 If you have any questions, please contact our office U.11datMengine nng144601pad certification 4460.wpd jooRpFESSJO R. _C Z rn C 38144 M ExP•3 -3/f Lr�'r CNIL OF CWit (760) 7S3 -5525 a EAx (760) 943.8236 4407 Manchester Avenue • Suite 105 • Encinitas, California 92024 O V E R T U R N E D BILL WECHTER / STAEF PHOTOGR.AINIER Bulldozer's driverflown to hospital A bulldozer lies overturned in Olivenhain on Tuesday morning as a who was freed from the wreck by Encinitas firefighters. See story, Mercy Air helicopter takes off with the injured driver of the bulldozer, Page 134. United Airlines reportedly buying US Airways ■ UAL to pay $4.313 in cash, assume $7.313 in debt, leases BRAD SKILLMAN AssociATEn PRESS NEW YORK —The owner of United Airlines, the world's largest airline, has agreed to buy US Airways, according to a debt and long -term leases. The paper cited sources familiar with the deal. Officials at Arlington, Va.- based US Airways declined comment Tuesday evening. United spokesman Andy Plews also declined to comment. United flies more than 570 jets to 130 destinations in the United States as well as 25 oth- er countries. US Airways, the world's 10th largest airline, flies more than 390 aircraft to nearly Quackenbush walks o ■ State insurance commissioner accuses committee of `political ambush' ANY CHANCE, DAN SMfTH WW PATRICK HOGE SCRIPT'S- MCCLATCHY WESTERN SERVICE SACRAMENTO — State In- surance Commissioner Chuck Quackenbush accused the Sen- ate Insurance Committee of realizing Truman hated the piece, once calling it "obnox- ious as a state song." But Tru- man was extremely hard of hearing at that time and when Nixon finished ph -Wing, Truman turned to Bess and asked, "What was that ?" Eisenhowees press secretary, James Hagerty, recalled that Ike used to tell him what to say at a press con- ference. "If I go out to that press conference and say what you want me to say, I would get hell," Hagerty would tell Ike. To which Ike replied, "My boy, better you than me!" POTHOLES —If you're planning on a mad trip this summer, you might consider taking the back roads and stay- ing off the interstates. Many of our nation's major interstates are either in terrible condition or under construction. Worst shape thus far. Missouri's Inter- state 70 between Kansas City and St. Louis. MARVIN UPDATE —To those sitting at home wonder- ing how Marvin the Magnifi- cent is holding up, I can honest- ly report that as of this writing, he is performing as expected. We've put 4 quarts of oil in his engine since leaving Oceanside (due to a small oil leak); we're averaging 9 to 10 mpg, far bet- ter than expected. GAS UPDATE — Unleaded gas in southern Minnesota is averaging $1.39.9 per gallon. The cheapest has been $1.29.9 in Oklahoma; most other prices hover between $1.45 and $1.50 per gallon throughout the Mid- west- Notes for Tom Morrow can continue to be einailed to morrow@rxxirr a .corn. Tuesday. But court documents show the defendants have ar- gued that association rules were understood and apply to the situation. On May 18, Burke's attorney filed a lawsuit in Superior Court in Vista to get a tempo- rary restraining order, a prelim- inary injunction and a perma- nent injunction against the San Diego County Lacrosse Associ- ation and the San Dieguito Unified School District. If granted, the temporary re- 10- PLAYER, B-6 Bulldozer falls on operator JO MORELAND STAFF WRITER OLIVENHAIN —With about 80,000 pounds of machinery pinning him down, a bulldozer operator was able to help fire- fighters rescue him from under the bulldozer after it fell on him Tuesday. Michael Boatman, about 30, suffered internal injuries when the rubber -tired bulldozer top- pled down a slope shortly after 9:30 a.m. and rolled over at a construction site off Wildflower Drive near Lilac Summit, au- thorities said. He was in serious condition at Scripps Memorial Hospital, La .i4la, after his ruptured collapse at Black's Beach BILL WECHTER STAFF WRITER LA JOLLA — A large sec- tion of unstable bluff at Black's Beach could come down at any moment, a life- guard warned Tuesday. The protruding section, which is approximately 25 wider in the last few days, said San Diego lifeguard Mark Korch. On Sunday, a large section of the same 100- foot -tall bluff came down as five peo- ple on the beads tan for their lives. The area of danger is im- mediately south of the Box Canyon, which is south of the Torrey Pines Gliderport. When the dust settled, ap- proximately 500 cubic feet of rubble lay across a 30 -foot This Is the black cushioned driver's seat of the overturned bulldozer. A fireman said if the driver had stayed in the seat when the bulldozer went over, he would have been MNed. spleen was removed during sur- gery, said Lesley Nevets, hospi- tal spokeswoman. "He was saying, `Get this thin!Soff me. It hurts,'" said Encinitas firefighter- paramedic Ennis Jackson. "He was in a lot of pain." > FALLS, 13-6 when he noticed some rocks, sand and dust coming down. On the beach, three people were looking up at the bluff. Korch jumped in his pick- up truck and sped approxi- mately 100 yards to the beachgoers. "I screamed bloody murder ... Move! "' Split seconds later, as the people were running to the water and he was whipping his truck around to get away, C211c11110Ary Panel to ki to reduce MICHAEL J. WILLIAMS STAFF WRITER CARLSBAD — Concern about noise emanating fror McClellan - Palomar Airport ha led to the creation of a coalitio of officials, residents and ai: port users who will hold thei first meeting Thursday. The Palomar Airport Roum table 2000 is scheduled to cot vene at 5:30 p m. at the city's Safi ty Center at 1635 Faraday Ave. "The purpose is to invest gate and explore alternative: and make recommendations n garding noise and safety cot cerns involving aircraft fror McClellan- Palomar Airport, Assistant Airport Manager Kin Dores said. In response to rising nois complaints,*$e county Palome B6 WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 2000 > FALLS Continued from &1 The bulldozer's roll cage and roll bar collapsed under the bulldozer as it landed upside down on Boatman. If he hadn't somehow made it off the dri- ver's seat, he might have been cashed, firefighters said. "If he had been inches to the right or inches to the left, we probably would have been pulling a corpse out of there," said Jackson. Fire Capt. Pete Avila said it wasn't known whether Boatman was wearing a seat belt or how he landed the way he did. Contractor G.F. Whillock Grading and Excavating of Vista shut down the construction work after the accident in the Wildflower Estates section of custom homes. A company spokesman couldn't be reached for comment. The state Division of Occupa- tional Safety and Health began an investigation about noon. It will include looking at whether the rollover protections were proper and whether the opera- tor was properly trained, said Dean Fryer, division spokesman. "They (roll bars) are sup- posed to support the weight of the machine," said Dick Williams, used-equipment man- ager for Hawthorne Machinery Co. of Escondido. "They should never be modified." A three - quarter -inch steel > SPOT Continued from &t "Quite frankly, I look at this as a positive situation," because .— it sends a message countywide that illegal activity won't be tol- erated at the club, he said. On Dec. 18, deputies arrested four people at Club Velvet for possession and possession for sale of date -rape and party drug Ketamine and Ecstasy. After those arrests, Fennell said, he met with sheriff's per - wNlnel In offer his cooperation and tho rlublt security efforts ware Ntt'rantwl f1aAM11Y al Iha rluh lorludw. `If he had been inches to the right or inches to the left, we probably would have been pulling a corpse out of there.' — ENNIS JACKSON Encinitas firefighter- paramedic bar had Boatman pinned down when firefighters from Encini- tas and Carlsbad arrived. Fire- fighters had to slowly and care- fully cut the bar free over about half an hour, because they weren't sure if the bulldozer might shift at some point. Once the bar was removed, Boatman was able to move around in the mud and wet grass, Jackson said. "He wiggled and we pulled, and we just pulled him out of there," said the firefighter -para- medic. "Then he actually had to lift up over another beam to get out of there. We supported him" A Mercy Air helicopter flew Boatman to the hospital. A fire- fighter who strained his back during the rescue was treated at Scripps Memorial Hospital, Encinitas, and released, Avila said. He said the firefighter was released from duty for the shift. ing lot, the main entrance to the club, in every room and restroom and at every exit. Management has also posted signs proclaiming zero drug tol- erance and threatening prose- cution as well as instituted a strict dress code and access pol- icy. Undercover agents are also being used to detect illegal ac- tivity, he said. "I think they're doing the best they can, but they need law enforcement to assist them, and that's what we're trying to do," said sheriffs Lt. Don Fowler, not- ing sheriff's deputies are in- creasing their enforcement at the club. "The good thing is, most of the people there are just Innkino in haw anma f ,n " > PASTOR Continued from &1 Marin County. There he con- tinued an "inappropriate rela- tionship" with one of the women from the Solana Beach church who attended school there, church documents state. Church officials declined to disclose other details of the alle- gations. No specific duration was set for McCullough's suspension. But reports from the therapist > PLAYER Continued from &1 straining order would have al- lowed Burke to play. Burke's attorney claims that the National Collegiate Athletic Association rules, not the San Diego County Lacrosse Associa- tion rules, should have been fol- lowed in delving out punish- ment. The NCAA rules call for lacrosse players who engage in unsportsmanlike conduct to be ejected from just one game, not three. In this situation, that would have been the playoff game on Saturday, which Torrey Pines High won. Then Burke would lowed to host parties from 10 p.m. to 3 a.m. on Saturday nights since the end of the annual rac- ing season last year. Since then, numerous requests for medical assistance related to drug use at the club have been received and that led to the December ar- rests, officers said. In Match and April undercov- er law enforcement officers pur- chased numerous amounts of ec- stasy at the club. n _. AND conducting rehabilitation counseling must be given ti Presbytery Committee of istry every six months so can monitor McCullot progress- McCullough could no reached at his Northern Ca nia home late Tuesday. The Solana Beach Presb ian Church has referred k lions about the trial to the Diego Presbytery, which he comment Tuesday. Church officials in San 1 cisco said they received al. lions about McCullough in, and formed an investiga have been allowed to play championship game Sunday Judge Lisa Guy-Schall re ed that argument Friday, Burke sat out the champion game, which Torrey Pines 10-9. Burke has not decided t he will do, said Tim McCla La Jolla attorney who re sents the youth. "We believe there were sion I college scouts at championships and Colin been in touch with scouts I Rutgers (University) and U.S. Military Academy at) t Point," McClain said. "He have lost his chance a $100,000 scholarship" "(Pursuing the lawsuit) is useful in terms of Colin pla in the state championships," On Saturday, 14 people in the club were arrested on s1 cion of being under the it ence of drugs, and three pe, who were leaving the I grounds were arrested on s1 cion of driving while under influence of alcohol or drug, finals said. Two other persons were rested on drug charges at t homes. The completion of o drug investigations relate, ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations 5ubdi%ision Engineering Traffic Engineering INTRADEPARTMENTAL TRANSMITTAL FORM T Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) ❑ Subdivision Engineering (SE) Traffic Engineering (TE) ❑ O District Support Services (_D) ❑ Office of the Director ( #1) ❑ Field Operations (FO) ❑ ATTENTION: 7i, v &4 a1AZ�/IL— DATE: IAi /b Z� Regarding (Finance Number GS 3/D DEPOSIT /FEE TPNLgWVMUP /MIN/DR: (Finance Number Gd 7S - DEPOSITIF'EE QA.C!__6'+7 iSU?{71 ✓JSiY�ni (Finance Number //J L ) DEPOSIT/FEE APN: Transmitted as following: Comments /Additional Space for Document Final Parcel Map ❑ Final Map ❑ Submittal/Amended/Corrected 1) Response to Plancheck ❑ _ Proposed ❑ Corrected ❑ Approved ❑ Interoffice Memo` ❑ 2) Miscellaneous Exhibit ❑ Blueline/Red -lined ❑ Checkprint ❑ Original ❑ Certificate ❑ 3) Street Vacation Application ❑ Approved TM/IPM ❑ Resolution of Approval ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ 4) Street Name Change Application ❑ Preliminary Title Report ❑ Guarantee ❑ Tax Certificate ❑ 5) Other ❑ 6) Copies to: i lC$ Copies of all documents listed in preliminary title report/Vesting Deed ❑ Traverse Calculations ❑ Reference Maps ❑ Letter Re: Access ❑ Additional Notes: Corporate/Partnership Papers ❑ Property Appraisal ❑ Utility Letter' ❑ Deferred Monumentation Letter ❑ Agency Letter: ❑ Legal Description ❑ Plat ❑ Recording Fee ❑ ❑ Easement re: Covenant re: ' ( CD/ CS/ FIRE/SDWD /OMWD/LCWD /G &F/T /CATV) Highway ❑ Trail ❑ Improvements ❑ Sewer ❑ Park ❑ Impact Fees ❑ Sketch (if needed) / Description: Drainage ❑ ❑ Assessments ❑ Agreement re: ❑ Improvements ❑ Pvt. Rd. Maint. ❑ ❑ (;'`� t e t ` Q� �- - �. {- - -- V',* Improvemen Ian CAS -3 ��SubmittaUPlan Change s -Bu' Proposed Correcte E] Approved Mfg. Specs. Blueline/Red -lined Checkprint [D Original ` Y' Cross Sections ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ (Public/Private) Note: See other blocks for addi'on items, if any. (Road/Drainage /Water /Sewer/fraiVPark/Faciliry) /al 6L Grading Pla Submittal/Plan Change/ s -built Proposed Correcte Approved cc ' ❑ Blue] ine/Red -lined Checkprint Original ❑ Hydraulic Calculations/Map ❑ Cost Estimate ❑ Soil Report ❑ Letter re: Permission to Grade ❑ Structural Calculations ❑ (Mass/Rough/Preliminary/Precise) Note: See other blocks for additional items, if any. (Erosion Control/Planting & Irrigation) As Per... Submittal Re906rements Our Conversation E] Public Inquiry/Proposal ❑ Our Approval ❑ For Your... Review Use ❑ Approval ❑ Signature ❑ Information ❑ /e/<–J ORIGINATOR: (Name) (Position) 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL (760) 633- 26001FAX (760) 633 -2627 / TDD (760) 633 -2700 1SG /APR/Intra Trans.doc /02.11.99 I of I letter of transmittal DATE: JUNF 8/ ZOO/ JOB#: SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING. INC. [IC Engineers - Planners - Surveyors C014 4407 Manchester Avenue, Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 .1� 'q p ' 'I Phone: 760 753 -5525 GI FAX: 760 943 -8236 rrv�!��SERVIn TO: T'D,f 15/'96 ,"Cl' C /Ty OG ,EitJC /✓ /T/dS ,ENG /✓ /T/fS Chi JZo Z ¢ RE: Ti✓! �19-/3 9 SUBJECT: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION z_ (jCv,EG/ -✓.tl W�i9Si3v /GTf� /�//Ih.O Z / D✓.6 7- 7'/ Col-9, 0/16 row 4"5 PUSS /l6 G/c . Ti11C y� w rOOG�T S ��1 Ti�O d✓ T /tom /2 ��J/�`��l�£ �v1 THANK YOU, By: Ivan R. Fox, President -x�emtje Ac f roM 3&7*r Gee PROJECT MEMO CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2cxwZ TO: Af /V,4,jc DATE: %%%A 1 Z 9 , }y_ FROM: 7�D/) Pii7L11711-3A, -11 &53 -279& TIME: 9 uo A,n PROJECT /PERMIT NO.: �k /PV / bolo 2 C, I f d2O 75 &Z SUBJECT: IA' OX'Dfle ru <II Al u!� F F��rA[ 7h'E %ULLUw��/L- /s �tG ui.PEO Z) l 7k %q ,oE /.J/' 11/ELuA4 A) i�a/ (e 1 J¢ 6,eA/JE /I-hi,b, /5v in5tall relaloirr, L al( / T NavE PAqs; 41 /A/j7,gi 4 _ /n' !)//IF R" rulrC CclyejQETE %PfllL CR055 /1Y6 LulTH HEAVv A<06,1y! FiNi5N A612O5 Lvit6fl VER "'111 . NAVt tAyauT Lornnvn/ %n/�c� BE`oeE .5r- nRnA147 C4ty Engkneer /Acting Agent See &,Cb 751 /91 A A WHITE -Job Site; YELLOW -File; PINK - Inspector PUNCHLIST FOR ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL S -LY END OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE Permits 6062G], 60621I, & 6075G] O% May 18, 2001 V Z Pad certifications within 0.10'. If pad is not within 0.10' a set of red -lined plans must be submitted to the Engineering Dept. for approval. �Zl•o1 Submit Final Soils report. V ,O�! Complete drainage improvements. Rip rap was silted over in 2 locations. Remove and replace rip rap. Brow ditch is missing between parcel 2 and 3 and partially missing on both sides of parcel 1. A downdrain per D -22, type B is required at sta. 46 + 42. Rip rap dissipators (3) need to be installed on the west side of Parcel 1. All brow ditches must be properly graded and backfilled on each side. Remove forms laying adjacent to brow ditches. All structures and pipes must be cleaned out. Raise sewer manholes to grade. The sewer must be wainballed, mandrelled, air - tested, and video'd. Raise utilities to grade behind curbs. (i.e. water meter boxes and SDG &E vaults.) .ZS 1 In order to receive rough grading approval for parcel 1, the asphalt driveway must be installed to the pad. Finish 2 foot wall and backfill on the easterly side of parcels 2 and 3. Grade slope �.01 and plant. 1' The above items were completed on -6-01 and approved by (date) (inspector) Submit confirmation from OMWD that water facilities are approved. y,pl 7 -Z pl Backfill curbs. The parkway width of 2.5' behind curbs must be graded at 2 %. .ol lr Install first lift of AC pavement. �Zy'ol 'Aro' Remove stockpile of dirt from remainder parcel. DO NOT SPREAD. 1 p Install no parking, fire lane signs. Install blue raised pavement marker at fire hydrant locations. Raise utilities to grade behind curbs. (i.e. water meter boxes and SDG &E vaults.) .ZS 1 In order to receive rough grading approval for parcel 1, the asphalt driveway must be installed to the pad. Finish 2 foot wall and backfill on the easterly side of parcels 2 and 3. Grade slope �.01 and plant. 1' The above items were completed on -6-01 and approved by (date) (inspector) ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL OF GRADING PERMIT The following requirements are the minimum allowable prior to rough grading approval. 1. All grading operations required to obtain the elevations shown on the grading plan are complete and pad elevations are within 0.1 ft. Provide geotechnical report certifying the grading has been performed in accordance with the soils report and the compaction test results shall be submitted to the City. All retaining walls shown on the approved grading plans also require a letter of Certification, for each wall shown, from the geotechnical engineer. 2. All drainage systems, public and private, surface and subsurface, have been installed and completed per the grading plan, inspected and approved by the inspector. Yard drain inlets need not be installed at this point for rough grading approval. 3. All sewer systems shall be installed and accepted by City Inspector and the appropriate District. 4. All water systems, including fire protection systems, are to be installed and accepted by the appropriate District and the City as complete, including pressure testing, bacteria testing and chlorinating. 5. Curb and gutter, sidewalk grades are completed and R value tests have been taken. Letter of certification from the Engineer certifying line and grade are required. Compaction report from the geotechnical engineer is also required. 6. All fire hydrants are to be installed, tested, inspected and accepted by the Fire Department. 7. All roads are to be installed, except for the final lift of paving. B. All dry utilities shall be installed, inspected and approved by the appropriate agency. All other safety and health issues as required by the City to assure a safe and hazard free environment. These items are to be submitted to the City Inspector along with a written request for rough grading approval. The Inspector will the approve or disapprove and forward to the Engineering Department. J 1 \{illiVJ 3086 Wildflower Drive, Encinitas, 12 June, 2002 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, Ca. 92024 To Whom It May Concern, I Jo Ramos approve the installation of the horse trail located on my property at 3086 Wildflower Drive, Encinitas, Ca. The horse trail will be located within the existing horse trail easement or a new easement located on the opposite side of the street. Please accept this letter as approval for the horse trail at either location. Sincerely, QQ Jo Ramos ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects city Of District Support Services Field Operations Encinitas Subdivision Engineerng Traffic Engineering Field Clearance to Allow Occupanc TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Building Permit No. o/ - -- 4192 Name of Project E5nq 7L-�- Name of Developer 2ZAeftpq (�nsneuc7701�) I have inspected the site at 3o&. DRryE , (address... number ...street name ._sufflxl and have determined that finish (precise) grading and fany other related site improvements are substantially complete and that occupancy is merited. ISignature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if appropiate) Reference: Engineering Permit No. (0075GS (� —17 - - -o Z fDate) fDatel Special Note: Please do not sign the "blue card" (hat is issued by Building Inspection Division and given to the developer. You are only being asked to verify field conditions. Office staff still has the responsibility to verify that compliance with administrative requirements is achieved, typically payment of impact fees or execution of documents. Return this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by dropping it in the slot labelled "final inspection" that is located between the desks of the engineering technicians. Also, please remember to do final inspections on the related engineering permits and return that paperwork, if completed. Thank you. 1SG /field.doc I TFL 760-633 -2600 / FAX 760- 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 •44� recycled paper Todd Baumbach From: John Frenken To: Todd Baumbach Date: 6/12/02 2:56PM Subject: Re: Sorry __ Page Thanks Todd. I'm sure we can work it out! What you described will work to get occupancy for the owner at 3086. John Frenken Park Supervisor City of Encinitas (760) 633 -2755 jfrenken @ci.encinitas.ca.us -� 7Baumbac�'�h -trail -- From: John Frenken To: Todd Baumbach Date: 6/12/02 3:04PM Subject: Mayo trail II ... Phil spoke with Al this morning, and Al agreed to redo the easement to match what is physically in the ground. I spoke with Al this afternoon regarding the crossing. He is going to install a concrete crossing in the location you and I discussed to connect the existing trail to the new trail on the north side of Wildflower Dr. Thanks for your help. John Frenken Park Supervisor City of Encinitas (760) 633 -2755 jfrenken @ci.encinitas.ca.us CC: Greg Shields; Phillip Cotton age 1 j Ivan R. Pna, P.E. Barry L. Munson, P.E. Gordan L. McElroy, P.L.S. Laurie Sinn, Principal Planner CIVIL ENGINEERING Enginecnng Sludus Silc Devel.rynanl Analyau G uling Plans Impmven cn1 Plena Dru. , Plans scwcrM'nn Llnc Plan HydmingyMydnulN Corn.,. Adminlsaation P.,cmenl R,Iebdivaoo Formal, E.,na .ng LAND PANNING P .AcNu inon Analyse I,and Uu Cnmullation Env .m ,enul Analysis Cnwrmncni Rdmom Lard Division Twmo, Maps Myor Uw Pcnniu Sp,cifi, Plana Retuning Vanalrccr Adminislnlivc Pamns Anneaalions Hourdw Adivaumnls LAND SURVEYING Pmpcny Surveys T,o,rapAical Surveys Corn ,,m SWmg Re, snl Survey L egtl D,xnpunle Suwlnnlun Map F renxnl. Neigh, Cclllf .Ions cadaunl surrcya Pwlnran nneunc surveys SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERS PLANNERS - SURVEYORS October 16, 2002 SIDE 4460 City of Encinitas Engineering Services 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas. CA 92024 Subject: As- Graded Certification Reference: Project No. 98 -139. Grading Permit No. 6075 -G In accordance with general note 9 on sheet 1 of the above referenced grading plan, this letter is hereby submitted as a certification that the grading under permit no. 6075 -G has been performed in substantial conformance with the City of Encinitas approved grading plan no. 6075 -G. Sincerely, Steven R. Crosby P.E. Senior Associate Engineer R MD. 41975 EXP. 3 -31-03 Date: %D//7�U2 (760) 753 -5525 • Fax (760) 943.8236 4407 Manchester Avenue • Suite 105 • Encinitas, California 92024 OAKLEY FINAL PUNCHLIST Permits 6075GI, 6062GI, 6062II & DCS315 September 30, 2002 Submit As- graded certification. IpIZ�� Note: The as- graded certification is not the same as the pad certification. See General note #9 on the grading plan 6075 -G for wording. d9. Remove the high line in front of Parcel 4. Install a retaining wall at the backflow tPIVI L prevention device. Abandon the old driveway by landscaping the parkway behind the curb. REMAINDER PARCEL Permit 6809GI 1. Submit pad certi ation. 2. Submit As- builts. 3. Submit As- graded certificat general note #9 on sheet 1 of Grading Plan 6809 -G for wording. 4. Clean out brow ditch ng the No side of the parcel. 5. Backfill/com the perimeter of the cat basin in the Northerly comer of the parcel. 6. " PVC drain into the side of the existing brow h. Patch brow ditch as ecessary. This drain should be shown on the as- builts. The above items were completed on tq�yf°Z -and approved by 7 (date) (inspector) Note: Soils reports and certification must be original copies. No Xerox or Faxes.