2008-952 GLine: rl
EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION
& ENGINEERING, INC.
(Mailing)
P. O. Box 1941 . Lakeside, CA 92040
10915 Hartley Road, Suite "I"
Santee, CA 92071
Telephone (619) 25 8-7901
Geotechnical FIELD DAILY Report
rz
Location
A910.
MC. _I—Weather
P.
Equipment
Obsery./Testing of
iF M i.
i
/
a
i/
[i
MEN�'
,
i
Ackncwleged
Representing
ENGINEERING SER VICES DEPARTMENT
cityCtt•11Qf Capitol Improvement Projects 1
JJ District Support Services � �r
E12L'ZS2rtas Feld Operations p J
Subdivision Engineering
Traffic Engineering 1V1 Jj( 1`
ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL ° 0
TO: Subdivision Engineering
Public Service Counter
FROM: Field Operations
Private Contract /f Inspection / /
RE: Grading
� Per r it No. o � 44 J
Name of Project ,; 101AI LI
Name of Developer,
Site Location
... :iaddress. ::
name . ,. • ,:- ,11 _:...suffix) :OO't) .,. ,..,(bldg) , .. .. _.
:• ;: A have inspected the gra g,abthe ubject,site and •:have,tivwfifletl'tertlfication. cif the pad by
z :. •...:.'•
the .Engineer of WorkKUateq Wv : dated L and cedru tion of solo.
compaction by the Soil Engineer, date Z—
i'am hereby
:.satisfied that the rough - grading has been comOlQted, , in- accordance:wjth:the:approved
••-,;5• °r-plan s, and - specifications , - Chapter .23.24-of-the Municipal Code, anidt:any *ether- applicable- -- •
'�--r -tf ^•- c.
ertgineering standards and.specific project requirements:. r:...;r,. r
TV_',
Based.on,my observation and the certifications,.l take no exception to the issuance:of' .9.::
building permit for the lotls) as noted or Phase , If any, but only in so far as grading is
concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to
other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail
improvements, and their availability, any other public Improvements, deferred
monumentation, or final grading.
Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further
advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and
Irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
'?' ""� '401L_� i nQ
— /9--d
(Signature of Engineering inspector) (Date)
(Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, oMy if appropiate) datte) `
Reference: Building Permit No.
Special Notr. Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering
technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork
when completed Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with
Building Inspection Thank you.
JSGffield3.docl
TEL 760 - 633 -2600 ) FAX 760533-2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, CGlifomia 92024 -3633 TDD 760533 -2700 4� recycled paper
ENGINEERING SER VICES DEPARTMENT
capitol Improvement Projects
city 0f District Support Services
EEYLCin&as Feld Operations
Subdivision Engineering
Traffic Engineering
ROUGH GRADING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
TO: Subdivision Engineering
Public Service Counter
FROM: Field Operations
Private contract inspection
I:M
Grading Permit No. 9,52 &�
Name of Project
Name of Develop
S e '
Site Location 15464 Al (la
...street name -""v' ...suffix) (lot) (wag)
!address - ...number -
- . The proposed grading .of the subject site will require construction of retaining
walls that are also building wails. The inspection of the site retaining walls is to be
done by the Field-Operations Division of the Engineering Services Department.
However, the inspection of the building retaining walls is to be done by the
Building Inspection Division of the community Development Department.
Therefore, issuance of the necessary Building Permit is requested in order to
facilitate the completion of rough grading.
NO INSPECTIONS BEYOND FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATION ARE TO BE
PROVIDED BY BUILDING INSPECTION UNTIL A NOTICE OF ROUGH
GRADING APPROVAL, WITHOUT CONDITIONS AND SIGNED BY THE
ENGINEERING INSPECTOR, IS RECEIVED. FRAMING IS PROHBITED.
/ �� i ?r_ s - - 0-p
(Signature of Engineering inspector) (Date)
(Signature of Senior GVI) Engineer, only if appropiate) (Date)
Reference: Building Permit No. _ --
Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering
technicians' in- boxes. please remember to do a full rough grading approval and submit that paperwork, when
completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building
Inspection. Thank you.
]SG /field2.doc l
771 760-633 -2600 I FAX 760.633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, Califomia 92024 -3633 TDD 760. 633 -2700 recyGed paper
Dec. S. 2008 2:48PM
TO:
FROM;
FACSIMILE
EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION
AND ENGINEERING, INC.
10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I"
SANTEE, CA 92071
Phone_(619) 258 -7901
Facsimile-.(619) 258 -7902
Mr. Benjamin Oliver
GeoPacifica
Michael Duncan
RE: Rough Grading Compaction Report
Matt Power
1866 Sheridan Road, Encinitas
FAX if: 760-721 -55`39
DATE: 12/8/2008 2:12 PM
TOTAL PAGES INCLUDING COVER= 6
No-8375 P. 1/6
Dec. 8. 2008 2:48PM
EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION
AND ENGINEERING, INC.
10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE `•I"
SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071
(619) 258 -7901
Fax 258 -7902
Matt & Celine Power
1866 Sheridan Road
Encinitas, California 92024
Subject: Report of Field Density Tests
Power Residence
1866 Sheridan Road
Encititas, California 92024
No-8375 P. 2/6
December 8, 2008
Project No. 08- 1147A2
References: L "Foundation Plans and Details Review, Power Residence, 1866 Sheridan Road,
City of Encinitas, California 92024 ", Project No. 08- 1147A2, Prepared by East
County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated July 14, 2008.
2-"Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Power Residence, 1866 Sheridan Road, City
of Encinitas, California 92024 ", Project No. 08- 1147A2, Prepared by East County
Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated May 15, 2008.
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Power:
This is to present the results of field density tests performed on the building pad and the baokfill
of the retaining wall for the proposed single -family rosidence at the subject site.
Ia accordance with your request, in -place field density tests were performed in accordance with
ASTM D1556 (Sand Cone Method). Grading was conducted between November 14 and
December 5, 2008 under the observation and testing of a representitive of East County Soil
Consultation and Engineering Inc.
The results of the field density tests are presented on Page T -1 under "Table of Test Results ". The
laboratory determinations of the maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the
fill soils are set forth on Page L -1 under "Laboratory Test Results ". The approximate test
locations are shown on Plate No. 1.
Following clearing and grubbing, i,e. the removal of brush, vegetation, concrete waste and debris
from the demolition of the existing struture, subgrade soils were overexcavated to a depth of
approximately 4 feet below existing grade into the dense sandstone of the Terrace Deposits
Formation. The bottom of the excavation was scarified to a depth of approximately 6 inches,
moisture conditioned and compacted.
Dec. 8, 2008 2:49PM No-8375 P. 3/6
MATT & cEuNE POWER PROJECT NO, 08- I147A2
On -site and imported f,11 soils consisting of silty sand were placed in thin lifts, moisture
conditioned around optimurn and compacted in excess of 90 percent relative compaction
Compaction was achieved with the use of a Kawaski 70 rubber -tired loader and a hand whacker.
Based on our field observations and density test results, it is our opinion that the grading
operation for the proposed single - fancily residence was performed in accordance with the
referenced geotechnical report (Reference No. 2) and local grading ordinances.
If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Pages T -1, L -1 and Plate No. I are attached.
Respectfully Submitted,
vyO SroH
y
P:o. CE 2704
w r.1
t Ezp: tx
Mamadou Saliou Diallo, P E.
RCE 54071, GE 2704
MSD /md
2
Dec. 8. 2008 2:49PM
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08-1147A2
PAGE T -1
TABLE OF TEST RESULTS
ASTM D15%
No -8375 P. 4/6
FG = FINISH GRADE
3
MAXIMUM.
DEPTH
FEILD
DRY
DRY
TEST
SOIL
OF FILL
MOISTURE
DENSITY
DENSITY
PERCENT
NO,
TYPE
IN FEET
%DRY WT.
P C.F.
P.C.F
C_OWACTION
REMARKS
I
1
1
6.8
120.5
123.0
98
2
1
2
9.7
114,9
123.0
93
3
2
2
10.6
120.0
124.0
97
4
2
4
9.4
119.7
124.0
97
5
1
4
9.2
114.9
123.0
93
6
1
6 FG
10.0
120.0
123.0
98
7
1
6 FG
9.5
118.7
123.0
97
8
1
2
8.1
117.1
123.0
95
9
1
2
8.2
119.9
123.0
97
10
1
2
9.1
118.0
123.0
96
11
2
2
9.1
116.4
124.0
94
12
2
2
8.8
121.5
124.0
98
13
3
4 FG
11.7
116.2
128.0
91
14
3
4 FG
9.3
118.5
128.0
93
15
3
4 FG
11.1
116.4
128.0
91
16
3
2 FG
8.0
106.1
128.0
83
See # 17
17
3
2 FG
9.1
121.3
128.0
95
Retest # 16
18
1
2 FG
8.6
114.8
123.0
93
FG = FINISH GRADE
3
Dec. 8. 2008 2 :49PM
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO 08- 1147A2
PAGE L -1
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
No-8375 P. 5/6
RESULTS OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE
The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill materials as determined by ASTM
D 1557, Procedures A and B which use 25 blows of a 10 -pound slide stammer falling from a height of 18
inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 4 -inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot compaction cylinder and Procedure
C which uses 56 blows of a 10 -pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal
layers in a 6 -inch diameter 1/13.3 cubic foot compaction cylinder are presented as follows:
OPTIMUM
MAXINIUM MOISTURE
SOIL TYPE / DRY DENSITY CONTENT
PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION LB/ CU. FT % DRY WT.._
I/A BROWN, SILTY FINE SAND 123.0 9S
2/A TAN BROWN, SILTY FINE 124.0 8.5
SAND
3/A TAN, SILTY, FINE SAND 128.0 10.1
(IMPORT)
EXPANSION IPIDF.X TEST (ASTM D4829)
INITIAL SATURATED INITIAL DRY
MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY EXPANSION
CONTENT( %) CONTENT( %1 (PCF) INDEX SOIL TYPE
10.4 202 110.4
No. 3
Dec. 8. 2008 2:49PM
AYE '
e e
G �
I
®y I
0'` l
�I
1
a
�I
No-8375 P. 6/6
EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION
& ENGINEERING, INC.
10925 HARTLEY RIO., SUITE 1. SANTEE, CA 92071
(619) 258 -7901 Fax (619) 238.7902
i
CB-1/¢7 -¢2 IA � 1AV1_�
Resource
Development
Corporation
CIVIL ENGINEERING • 5URVEYING • PLANNING
City of Encinitas
505 S. Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas. CA 92024
Re: Rough Grading Certification
Power Residence — 1366 Sheridan Road, Encinitas
Project No. 08 -037 CDP; Grading Permit ^:o. 352 -G
December 5, 2008
JN08 -001 H
Pursuant to Section 23.24.310 of Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as
a Pad Certification Letter for the subject project. As Engineer of Record, I hereby state that all rough
grading for this project has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and
requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards.
23.24.310 (B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the
approved grading plan:
Description Pad Elevation per Plan Pad Elevation per Field Measurement
Upper Level House Pad 86.8 86.9
Garage Pad 86.8 86.9
Lower Level House Pad 85.3 85.4
Guest House 86.3 86.3
23.24.310 (B) 1. Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices and /or retaining
walls have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan.
23.24.310 (B)5. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and
ara in su!stantial corf::rmance with the subject grading plan.
23.24.31 O(B)6. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been
field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan.
By:
Resource Development Corporation
Brian Donald, RCE 26175
License Expires 3!31/08
DO;- ALD
No. 25175 i
CIVIL t
Pro fessi:�a ^J
2410 5TROM6ERG CIRCLE • CARL513A0, CA 92010 • TEL (760)942 -1106 • FAX (760) 730 -3059
City of Encirtitas
505 South Vulcan A.enue
Encinitas, California 92024 -3633
Tel 760 -633 -2600- Fax 760.943 -2226
TDD 760- 633 -2700 - %.r i.encinitas.ca.us
Field Clearance to Allow Occupancy
TO: Subdivision Engineering
Public Service Counter
FROM: Field Operations
Private Contract Inspection
RE: Building Per it No. _ --
Name of Project / ovV /?
Name of Developer1�A�_
I have inspected the site at 1&4
address... number street name suffix
Fire
Building
Planning
Engineering
and have determined that finish (precise) grading
(lot no .) (bldg no.)
and any other related site improvements are substantially complete
and that occupancy is merited.
Signature of Engineering Date
Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if appropriate gp+ Date
Reference: Engineering Permit No.J
Special Note: Please do not sign the 'blue ctird' that is issued by Building Inspection Division and given to
the developer. You are only being asked to verify field conditions. Office staff still has the responsibility to
verify that compliance with administrative requirements is achieved, typically payment of impact fees or
execution of documents. Return this form, if completed, to counter staff by dropping it in the slot labeled
'Final Inspection" . Also, please remember to do final inspections on the related engineering permits and
return that paperwork. if completed. Thank you.
Resource
Development
Corporation
CIVIL ENGINEEFIN!'• • 5URVEYING • PLANNING
City of Encinitas
Engineering Services Permits
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
DEC 14 2009
Date: December 7, 2009
Re: Engineer's Final Grading Certification for Project No. 08 -037 CDP and
Grading Permit No. 952 -G
The grading under Permit No. 952 -G has been performed in substantial conformance with the
approved grading plan or as shown on the attached "As- Graded" plan.
Final grading inspection has demonstrated that lot drainage conforms with the approved grading
plan and that swales drain at a minimum of 1% to the street and/or an appropriate drainage
system.
All the Low Impact Development, Source Control and Treatment Control Best Management
Practices as shown on the drawing and required by the Best Management Practice Manual Part II
were constructed and are operational, together with the required maintenance covenant(s).
By: Engineer of Record Date:
Brian Donald, RCE 175
License Expires 3/31/2010
BRIAN
DONALD
No. 26175
CIVIL
Professions
Verification by the Engineering Inspector of this fact is done by the Inspector's signature hereon
and will take place only after the above is signed and stamped and will not relieve the Engineer of
Record of the ultimate responsibility:
40 te: //0—
By: Engineering Inspector _ �L
2410 5TPOM13ERG CIRCLE • CARL56A1), CA 92010 • TEL (760)942 -1106 • FAX (760) 730 -3059
CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ACTIVITY REPORT
{.}/ DATE: a8
�}]�
PROJECT NAME: / "'�f' PW PROJECT NUMBER: IC21
STREET LOCATION//: /i66b /4 PERMIT NUMBER:
CONTRACTOR: Ly y e —I TELEPHONE •
— +Pitt '61 )t
0100E - Dr ,
�c ecc «.( <<a;� cr v, ! fZ +7•tr�.r �1 Lp✓��y1 f1�.
rr
r1�,- goo i t C,,� k t7 a it-CA A/, r t�
C.', v r l nrro- /u
1�o, l S rWptll- n t i al. ,,"I
m14429
c
rh
Resource
Development
Corporation
CIVIL ENGINEERING • 5UPYEYING • PLANNING
Project Description:
Project Location:
City of Encinitas Project No:
City of Encinitas Dwg No:
Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost for Bonding Purposes
Power Residence
1866 Sheridan Road, Encinitas
08 -037 CDP
952 -G
Date: 13- Aug -08
ROC Job Number: 08.001B
Item Reference Quantity Unit Unit Cost Item Cost
PRIVATE GRADING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Onsite Cut & Fill
Soils Engineer
250
c.y.
$20.00
$5,000
Import & Place Select Fill
Soils Engineer
475
c.y.
$27.50
$13,063
Rock Filled Detention Pit
Detail on Plans
120
c.f.
$20.00
$2,400
Earth & Gravel Detention Berm
Detail on Plans
10
C.Y.
$50.00
$500
Rip -Rap at Pipe Outlet
1112' Rock or Decorative Cobbles
0.5
c.y.
$100.00
$50
12' Precast PCC Drain Inlet
Brooks 1212
3
ea.
$500.00
$1,500
4' Driveway Grate Drain
ACID Drain K100S
16
I.f.
$50.00
$800
4" PVC Drain Pipe
SDR 35
250
I.f.
$20.00_
$5,000
Class II Base for PCC Driveway
Detail on Plans
1,100
s.f.
$2.00
— vl;? 8
Subtotal Private Grading and Drainage Improvements
530513
PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS
AUG
1 3 2008
AC Pavement & Base
Soils Engineer
600
s.f.
$2.50
$1,500
PCC Flush Curb
Typical Section - Andrew & Sheridan
235
I.f.
$10.00
$2,350
6' PCC Curb
SDRSD G -1
265
Lf.
$10.00
$2,650
Turfblock & Gravel Swale
Typical Section - Andrew & Sheridan
1,700
s.f.
$5.50
$9350
DG Pathway
Typical Section - Andrew & Sheridan
1,350
s.f.
$3.00
$4,050
PCC Sidewalk
SDRSD G -5
100
s.f.
$5.00
$500
PCC Pedestrian Ramp with Truncated Col
SDRSD G -30
50
s.f.
$10.00
$500
Street Improvements $20,900
CONTROL
Gravel Bag Inlet Protection Gravel Filled Sandbags
200 ea
$1.00
$200
Gravel Bag Dam Gravel Filled Sandbags
100 ea
$1.00
$100
Silt Fence Caltrans BMP SC -1
275 H.
$1.60
$440
Construction Entrance Detail on Plans
1. - ea
$500.00
$500
Subtotal Erosion Control
v Bft!AN ~`
$1'240
DONALD
Subtotal Private Grading Public Street, and Erosion Control _
Y No. 26175
D
$52,653
Contingencies (10%)
CIVIL
s
$5,265
�n P ofessional
TOTAL PRIVATE GRADING, PUBLIC STREET, and EROSION CONTROL
'151
$57,918
2410 STFOM13EPG CIRCLE • CARL55AD, CA 92010 • TEL (760)942 -1106
f /LE
August 19, 2008
Matthew and Celine Power
1866 Sheridan Road
Encinitas, CA 92023 -1639
Re: Permit issuance requirements for:
Application 952 -G
Case # 08 -037 CDP
Site Address: 1866 Sheridan Road
APN 216 -053 -65
This letter summarizes the requirements for pulling your Engineering Permit for drawing 0952 -G. Your
approved plan will remain valid for one year. _ If the permit is not issued within six months from the date of
approval of the drawings, the plans will be subject to review by City staff for compliance with current codes
and regulations before a permit can be issued, and changes to the approved plans as well as additional
fees may be required.
Please read through this letter carefully and contact the City with any questions you may have. It
contains information about many requirements that may apply to your project and can make the
process clearer and easier for you.
In order to obtain the permits to construct the work shown on your approved plans, you will need to satisfy
the requirements below. All of the items listed below must be submitted to the Engineering front counter
in one complete package at the time the aaolicant comes in to null the permit Partial submittals of env
kind will not be accepted. Your project planchecker will not accept any of the documents listed on behalf
of the Engineering front counter staff; all items must be submitted to the front counter directly together and
at one time. The correct number of each of the requested documents must be provided; copies of
documents submitted to the City during plancheck do not reduce the necessary quantities listed below.
(1) Provide 4 print sets of the approved drawing 0952 -G
Provide 2 copies of the Soils Report titled "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Power Residence,
1866 Sheridan Road, City of Encinitas, California 92024" by East County Soil Consultation and
Engineering, Inc., dated May 15, 2008.
Pay additional plancheck fees in the amount indicated in the fee table below.
Pay NPDES plancheck fees in the amount indicated in the fee table below.
Submit 2 copies of the approved, signed (not draft) Resolution of Approval or Notice of Decision
for Planning Case # 08 -037 CDP, to be routed by the City to inspector and file.
(2) Post Security Deposits to guarantee all of the work shown on your approved drawings. The
amounts of security deposits are determined directly from the Approved Engineer's Cost Estimate
generated by your engineer according to a set of predetermined unit prices for each kind of work shown
on your plans. You will be required to post security deposit(s) as follows:
(a) Security Deposit for Grading Permit 0974 -G: in the amount $57.918.00 to guarantee both
performance and labor/ materials for earthwork, drainage, private improvements, and erosion
control based on limited bonding cost estimate dated August 13, 2008 per M. Maher.
(b) Security Deposit for Improvement Permit N /A: in the amount $0.00 to guarantee both the
performance and labor/ materials for the improvements shown on the approved improvement
plan.
(c) Security Deposit for Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities N /A: in the amount of $0.00 to
guarantee the required undergrounding of overhead utilities for your project.
(d) Security Deposit for Deferred Monumentation N /A: in the amount of $0.00 to guarantee
the setting of the monuments for your project. The amount of the security deposit is based
directly upon the Monumentation Cost Estimate provided by your project engineer.
A minimum of 20% and up to 100% of the amount listed in item(s) 2(a) must be in the form of
cash, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Up to 80% of the amount
listed in item 2(a) may be in the form of auto - renewing Performance and Labor and Materials
Bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company.
Up to 100% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(b), 2(c), and /or 2(d) may be in the form of auto-
renewing Labor and Materials bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company.
Cash, certificates of deposit, letters of credit, and assignments of account are also acceptable
financial instruments.
If a certificate of deposit (CD) will be obtained to secure the entire amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a)
and /or 2(b), two separate CD's for 25% and 75% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a) and /or
2(b) should be obtained in order to facilitate any future partial release of those securities. CD's
posted may be of any term but must be auto - renewing and must specify the City of Encinitas as a
certificate holder and include a clause that until the City of Encinitas provides a written request for
release of the CD, the balance shall be available to the City upon its sole request.
The format of any financial instrument is subject to City approval, may be in the owner's name
only, and must list the City of Encinitas as a Certificate Holder.
(3) Pay non - refundable fees as listed below:
Fee Type
Amount
Grading Inspection
S5.227.00
improvement Inspection
NIA
NPDES Inspection (Grading)
$1,045.00
NPDES Inspection (improvement)
N/A
Flood Control
$231.00
Additional Plancheck Fees Due
NIA
Encroachment Permit 952 -PE
290.00
GIS Mapping Fee (Maps/ PM's only)
NIA
The grading and improvement inspection fees are calculated based on 5% of first $100,000.00 of
the approved Engineer's cost estimate dated July 9, 2008 and 3% of the cost estimate over
$100,000.00. The NPDES inspection fee is assessed as 1% of the first $100,000.00 of the
approved Engineer's cost estimate and 0.6% of the cost estimate over $100,000.00. The flood
control fee is assessed at a rate of $0.21 per square foot of net new impervious surface area for
driveway and parking areas as created per the approved plan.
(4) Provide the name, address, telephone number, state license number, and license type of the
construction contractor. The construction of any improvements whin the public
right-of-way-or g_u_kjip._easements is restricted to qualified contractors possessing the
required state license as listed in the table below. The contractor must also have on file with
the City current evidence of one million dollar liability insurance listing the City of Encinitas as co-
insured. Additional requirements are described in the handout "Requirements for Proof of
Insurance" available at the Engineering front counter.
Type
Description
Work to be Done
A
General Engineering
any & all
C-8
Concrete
a ronlcurbl utter /ram (sidewalk
C -10
Electrical
li htin isi nals
C -12
Grading & Paving
any surface, certain drain -
basins /channels
C -27
Landscaping
planting/! rrigationlfencing & other
amenities
Mason
retainin walls
E
Parking &Highway
!m rovement
signage /stripinglsafety
Pipeline
I sanita sewerlstorm drain
(5) Permits are valid for no more than one year from the date of issuance and may expire earlier due
to expirations of letter of credit and/or insurance policies.
(6) This project does not propose land disturbance in excess of one acre and is exempt from the
State Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) requirement. An erosion control plan shall
be implemented per the approved grading plan.
Preconstruction Meeting: A preconstruction meeting at the project site is mandatory for all projects.
The preconstruction meeting may not be scheduled until the Engineering permit(s) have been issued, and
the applicant/contractor must give the assigned Engineering inspector a minimum of 48 hours advance
notice prior to the scheduled meeting time.
Right -of -Way Construction Permit: A separate right-of-way construction permit will be required for any
work in the public right -of -way or public easements. Typically, this work may include construction or
reconstruction of a portion of the driveway within the public right -of -way, excavation, backfill, and
resurfacing to install electric, gas, telephone, and cable television lines, or water and sewer connections.
A permit fee of $300.0 0 per application and a site plan, preferably the work order issued by the public
utility, will be required. Contractor license and insurance requirements apply. Permits must be issued at
least 48 hours in advance of the start of work.
Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits: These separate permits may be
required for your project and are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division. A fee of $250.00 is required
for traffic control plans. For more details, contact Raymond Guarnes, Engineering Technician, at (760)
633 -2704.
Release of Project Securities:
project inspector. The processing and release of securities may take up to 4 weeks after the release
process is initiated by the project Engineering inspector. Any cash releases will be mailed to the address
on this letter unless the City is otherwise notified, and all letters mailed to a financial institution will be
copied to the owner listed hereon. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection certified by the project
Engineering inspector is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposit assigned to any Grading
Permit. A sum in the amount of 25% of the securities posted for improvement permits will be held for a
one -year warranty period, and a release is automatically initiated at the end of that warranty period.
Construction Changes: Construction changes prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required for all
changes to the approved plans. Requests for construction change approval should be submitted to the
Engineering Services Department front counter as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved
Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation
due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees
and security deposits. Construction change fees of $200.00 and $350.00 will be assessed for minor and
major construction changes, respectively. Construction changes necessitating a new plan sheet will be
assessed the per -sheet plancheck and NPDES plancheck fees in lieu of the construction change fee.
Construction changes not previously approved and submitted as as -built drawings at the end of the
construction process will be rejected and the securities release will be delayed.
Change of Ownership: If a change of ownership occurs following approval of the drawing(s), the new
owner will be required to submit to the City a construction change revising the title sheet of the plan to
reflect the new ownership. The construction change shall be submitted to the Engineering front counter
as redline mark -ups on two blueline prints of the approved drawing together with two copies of the grant
deed or title report reflecting the new ownership. Construction change fees apply. The current owner will
be required to post new securities to replace those held by the City under the name of the former owner,
and the securities posted by the former owner will be released when the replacement securities have been
received and approved by the City.
Change of Engineer of Work: If a change in engineer of work occurs following the approval of the
drawing(s), a construction change shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering
Department. Two copies of the forms for the assumption of responsibility by the new engineer and the
release of responsibility by the former engineer shall be completed and submitted to the City.
Construction change fees apply.
As- bullts: Project as -built drawings prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required prior to Final
Grading acceptance by Engineering Services. Changes to the approved plans require a construction
This letter does not change owner or successor -in- interest obligations. If there should be a substantial
delay in the start of your project or a change of ownership, please contact the City to request an update.
Should you have questions regarding the posting of securities, please contact Debra Geishart, who
processes all Engineering securities, at (760) 633 -2779.
Should you have any other questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2780 or visit the Engineering
Counter at the Civic Center to speak with an Engineering Technician.
`S i Cinnnc c ` ` e �
Sir, °eel l lyy ,
`
Ruben Macabitas
Assistant Civil Engineer
cc Resource Development Corporation, Brian Donald, Engineer of Work
Debbie Geishart, Engineering Technician
Masih Maher, Senior Civil Engineer
permit/file
Eric Application
Requirements for Proof of Insurance
Security Obligation Agreements (various)
CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (6/2/98) Order Number: DEN - 2518970
ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (10/17/98) Page Number: 1
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
EAGLE Protection Owner's Policy D
FOR A ONE -TO -FOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
� 'L MAY 2 0 2008
OWNER'S INFORMATION SHEET I J
f M
�7
rlr_c ": �cnV1Z
Your Title Insurance Policy is a legal contract between You and Us,
It applies only to a one-to-four family residence and only if each insured name in Schedule A is a Natural Person, If the Land described in
Schedule A of the Policy in not an improved residential lot on which there is located a one- to-four family residence, or If each insured named
in Schedule A is not a Natural Person, contact Us immediately.
The Policy insures You against actual loss resulting from certain Covered Risks. These Covered Risks are listed on page 3 of the Policy. The
policy is limited by:
• Provision of Schedule A
• Exceptions in Schedule 8
• Our Duty to Defend Against Legal Actions on Page 4
• Exclusions on Page 4
• Conditions on Pages 4, 5 & 6
You should keep the Policy even if You transfer Your title to the Land.
If you want to make a claim, see paragraph 3 under Conditions on page 5.
You do not owe any more premiums for the Policy.
This sheet is not Your insurance Policy. It is only a brief outline of some of the important Policy features. The Policy explains in detail Your
rights and obligations and Our rights and obligations. Since the Policy- -and not this sheet - -is the legal document,
YOU SHOULD READ THE POLICY VERY CAREFULLY.
If you have any questions about your Policy, contact:
First American Title
1 First American Way
Santa Ana, CA 92707
714- 800 -3000 or 800 -854 -3643
FirstAmerican Title
CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (6/2/98)
ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (10/17198)
Order Number: DEN- 2518970
Page Number: 2
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
EAGLE Protection Owner's Policy
FOR A ONE -TO -FOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
OWNER'S COVERAGE STATEMENT 3
COVERED RISKS 3
OUR DUTY TO DEFEND AGAINST LEGAL ACTION 4
SCHEDULE A
Policy Number, Premium, Date and Time and Amount
Deductible Amounts and Maximum Dollar Limits of Liability 7
Street Address of the Land
1. Name of Insured 8
2. Interest in Land Covered 8
3. Description of the Land 8
SCHEDULE B -- EXCEPTIONS
EXCLUSIONS
CONDITIONS
1.
Definitions 4
2.
Continuation of Coverage 4
3.
How to Make a Claim 5
4.
Our Choices When We Learn of a Claim 5
5.
Handling a Claim or Legal Action 5
6.
Limitation of the Company's Liability 5
7.
Transfer of Your Rights to Us 6
8.
Entire Contract 6
9.
Increased Policy Amount 6
10.
Severability 6
11.
Arbitration 6
FitstAmencan Title
CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (6/2/98)
ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (10/17/98)
Order Number: DEN- 2518970
Page Number: 3
Policy of Title Insurance
� 1
ISSUED BY
First American Title Insurance Company
EAGLE Protection Owner's Policy
FOR A ONE -TO -FOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
OWNER'S COVERAGE STATEMENT
This Policy insures You against actual loss, including any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses provided under this Policy, resulting from the Covered Risks set forth
below, if the Land is an improved residential lot on which Mere is located a one - to-four family residence and each insured named in Schedule A is a Natural
Person.
Your insurance is effective on the Policy Date. This Policy covers Your actual loss from any risk described under Covered Risks if the event creating the risk exists
on the Policy Date or, to the extent expressly stated, after the Policy Date. Your insurance is limited by all of the following:
The Policy Amount shown is Schedule A
For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A
Exceptions in Schedule B
Our Duty To Defend Against Legal Actions
Exclusions an page 4
Conditions on page 4, 5 and 6.
COVERED RISKS
The Covered Risks are:
1. Someone else owns an interest in Your Title.
2. Someone else has rights affecting Your Title arising out of leases, contracts, or options.
3. Someone else claims to have rights affecting Your Title arising out of forgery or impersonation.
4. Someone else has an easement on the Land.
S. Someone else has a right to limit Your use of the Land.
6. Your Title is defective.
7. Any of Covered Risks I through 6 occurring after the Policy Date.
8. Someone else has a lien on Your Ttle including a:
a. Mortgage;
b. judgement, state or federal tax lien, or special assessment;
c charge by a homeowner's or condominium association; or
d. lien, occurring before or after the Policy Date, for labor and material furnished before the Policy Date.
9. Someone else has as encumbrance on Your Tile.
10.Swneone else claims to have rights affecting Your Tile arising out of fraud, duress, incompetency or incapacity.
11.You do not have both actual vehicular and pedestrian access to and from the Land, based upon a Legal right.
12.You are forced to correct or remove an existing violation of any covenant, condition or restriction affecting the Land, even if the covenant, condition w
restriction Is excepted in Schedule B.
13.Your Title is lost or taken because of a violation of any covenant, condition or restriction, which occurred before You acquired Your Title, even if the covenant
condition or restriction is excepted in Schedule B.
14.Because of an existing violation of a subdivision law or regulation affecting the Land:
a.You are unable to obtain a building permit;
b.You are forced to correct or remove the violation; or
c.someone else has a legal right to, and does, refuse to perform a contract to purchase the Land, lease it or make Mortgage loan on iL
The amount of Your insurance for this Covered Risk is subject to Your deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown is Schedule A.
15-You are forced to remove or remedy Your existing structures, or any part of them - other than boundary walls or fences - because any portion was built
without obtaining a building permit from the proper government office. The amount of Your insurance for this Covered Risk is subject to Your Deductible Amount
and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A.
16.You are forced to remove or remedy Your existing structures, or any part of them, because they violate an existing zoning law or zoning regulation. If You are
required to remedy any portion of Your existing structures, the amount of Your insurance for this Covered Risk is subject to Your Deductible Amount and Our
Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A.
17.You cannot use the Land because use as a single-family residence violates an existing mining law or zoning regulation.
FirstAmer %Can Tithe
CLTA Homeowners Policy of Title Insurance (6/2/98) Order Number: DEN- 2518970
ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (10117/98) Page Number: 4
18.You are forced to remove Your existing structures because they encroach onto Your neighbor's land. If the encroaching structures are boundary walls err
fences, the amount of Your insurance for this Covered Risk is subject to Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A.
19.Someone else has a legal right to, and does, refuse to perform a contract to purchase the Land, lease it or make a Mortgage loan on it because Your
neighbor's existing structures encroach onto the Land.
20.You are forced to remove Your existing structures because they encroach onto an easement or over a building set -back line, even if the easement or building
set -back line is excepted in Schedule B.
21.Your existing structures are damaged because of the exercise of a right to maintain or use any easement affecting the land, even if the easement is excepted
in Schedule B.
22.Your existing improvements (or a replacement or modification made to them after the Policy Date), including lawns, shrubbery or trees, are damaged because
of the future exercise of a right to use the surface of the Land for the extraction or development of minerals, water or any other substance, even if those rights
are excepted or reserved from the description of the Land or excepted in Schedule B.
23.Someone else tries to enforce a discriminatory covenant, condition or restriction that they claim affects Your Title which is based upon race, color, religion, sex,
handicap, familial status, or national origin.
24.A taxing authority assesses supplemental real estate taxes not previously assessed against the Land for any period before the Policy Date because of
construction or a change of ownership or use that occurred before the Policy Date.
25.Your neighbor builds any structures after the Policy Date - other than boundary walls or fences - which encroach onto the Land.
26.Your Title is unmarketable, which allows someone else to refuse to perform a contract to purchase the Land, lease it or make a Mortgage loan on it.
27.A document upon which Your Title is based is invalid because it was not properly signed, sealed, acknowledged, delivered or recorded.
28.The residence with the address shown in Schedule A is not located on the land at the Policy Date.
29.The map, if any, attached to this Policy does not show the correct location of the Land according to the Public Records.
OUR DUTY TO DEFEND AGAINST LEGAL ACTIONS
We will defend Your Title in any legal action only as to that part of the action which is baud on a Covered Risk and which is not excepted or excluded from
coverage in this Policy. We will pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses We incur in that defense. We will not pay for any part of the legal action which is not
based on a Covered Risk or which is excepted or excluded from coverage in this Policy. We can end Our duty to defend Your Title under paragraph 4 of the
Conditions.
This Policy Is not complete without Schedules A and B.
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from
I.Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and regulations concerning:
a.building b.zonmg c.land use
d.improvements on the Land eland division f.environmental protection
This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public Records at the Policy
Date.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14,15,16,17 or 24.
2.The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not apply to
violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date.
3.The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless:
a.a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date; or
b.the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You N You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking.
4.Risks:
a.that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they appear in the Public Records;
b.that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date;
cthat result in no loss to You; or
d.that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25.
5.Failure to pay value for Your Tolle.
6.1-ack of a right:
a.to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and
b.in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 18.
CONDITIONS
1.DEFINITIONS:
a.Easement - the right of someone else to use the Land for a special purpose,
b. Known - things about which You have actual knowledge. The words "Know" and "Knowing" have the same meaning as Known.
c.Land - the Land or condominium unit described in paragraph 3 of Schedule A and any improvements on the Land which are real property.
d.Mortgage - a mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed or other security instrument.
e.Natural Person - a human being, not a commercial or legal organization or entity. Natural Person includes a trustee of a Trust even it the trustee is not a
human being.
I. Policy Date - the date and time shown in Schedule A. If the insured named in Schedule A first acquires the interest shown in Schedule A by an instrument
recorded in the Public Records later than the date and time shown in Schedule A, the Policy Date is the date and time the instrument is recorded.
g.Publlc Racords - records that give constructive notice of matters affecting Your Title, according to the state statutes where the land is located.
h.Titla - the ownership of Your interest in the Land, as shown in Schedule A.
i.Trust - a Irving trust established by a human being for estate planning.
j.We /Our /Us - First American Title Insurance Company.
k.You /Your - the insured named in Schedule A and also those identified in paragraph 2.b. of these Conditions.
2.0ONTINUATION OF COVERAGE:
a.This Policy insures You forever, even after You no longer have Your Title. You cannot assign this Policy to anyone else.
b.This Policy also insures:
(1) anyone who inherits Your Title because of Your death;
(2) Your spouse who receives Your Title because of dissolution of Your marriage;
(3) the trustee or successor trustee of a Trust to whom You transfer Your Title after the Policy Date; or
First Amencan Title
CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (6/2/98) Order Number : DEN- 2518970
ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Tide Insurance (10/17/98) Page Number: 5
(4) the beneficiaries of Your Trust upon Your death.
c.We may assert against the insureds identified in paragraph 2.b. any rights and defenses that We have against any previous insured under this Policy.
3.HOW TO MAKE A CLAIM:
a.Prompt Notice Of Your Claim
(1) As soon as You Know of anything that might be covered by thls Policy, You must notify Us promptly in writing.
(2) Send Your notice to First American Title Insurana Company, 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, California, 92707, Attention: Claims Department. Please
include
the Policy number shown in Schedule A, and the county and state where the Land is located. Please enclose a copy of Your policy, if available.
(3) If You do not give Us prompt notice, Your coverage will be reduced a ended, but only to the extent Your failure affects Our ability to resolve the claim or
defend You.
b.Pract Of Your Loss
(1) We may require You to give Us a written statement signed by You describing Your loss which includes:
(a) the basis of Your claim;
(b) the Covered Risks which resulted in Your loss;
(c) the dollar amount of Your loss; and
(d) the method You used to compute the amount of Your loss.
(2) We may require You to make available to Us records, checks, letters, contracts, insurance policies and other papers which relate to Your claim. We may
make
copies of these papers
(3) We may require You to answer questions about Your claim under oath.
(4) If You fail or refuse to give Us a statement of loss, answer Our questions under oath, or make available to Us the papers We request, Your coverage will
be
reduced or ended, but only to the extent Your failure or refusal affects Our ability to resolve the claim or defend You.
4. OUR CHOICES WHEN WE LEARN OF A CLAIM:
a.After We receive Your notice, or otherwise leam, of a claim that is covered by this Policy, Our choices include one or more of the following:
(1) Pay the claim.
(2) Negotiate a settlement.
(3) Bring or defend a legal action related to the claim.
(4) Pay You the amount required by this Policy.
(5) End the coverage of this Policy for the claim by paying You Your actual loss resulting from the Covered Risk, and those costs, attorneys' fees and
expenses incurred up
to that time which We are obligated to pay.
(6) End the coverage described in Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 or 18 by paying You the amount of Your insurance then in force for the particular Covered Risk, and
those casts,
attorneys fees and expenses incurred up to that time which We are obligated to pay.
(7) End all coverage of this Policy by paying You the Policy Amount then in force and all those costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred up to that time
which
We are obligated to pay.
(8) Take other appropriate action.
b. When We choose the options in paragraphs 4.a. (5), (6) or (7), all Our obligations for the claim end, including Our obligation to defend, or continue to defend,
any legal action.
c.Even if We do not think that the Policy covers the claim, We may choose one or more of the options above. By doing so, We do not give up any rights.
S.HANDLING A CLAIM OR LEGAL ACTION
a.You must cooperate with Us in handling any claim or legal action and give Us all relevant information.
b.If You fail or refuse to cooperate with Us, Your coverage will be reduced or ended, but only to the extent Your failure or refusal affects Our ability to resolve the
claim or defend You.
c.We are required to repay You only for those settlement costs, attorneys' fees and expenses that We approve in advance .
d.We have the right to douse the attorney when We bring or defend a legal action on Your behalf. We can appeal any decision to the highest level. We do not
have to pay Your claim until the legal action is finally decided.
e.Whether or not We agree there is coverage, We can bring or defend a legal action, or take other appropriate action under this Policy. By doing so, We do not
give up any rights.
&LIMITATION OF OUR LIABILITY
a.After subtracting Your Deductible Amount if it applies, We will pay no more than the least of:
(1) Your actual loss,
(2) Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability then in fora for the particular Covered Risk, for claims covered only under Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 or 18, or
(3) the Policy Amount then in force, and any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses which We are obligated to pay under this Policy.
It. (1) If We remove the cause of the claim with reasonable diligence after receiving notice of d, all Our obligations for the claim end, including any obligation for
loss
You had while We were removing the cause of the claim.
(2) Regardless of 6.b. (1) above, it You cannot use the Land because of a claim covered by this Policy:
(a) You may rent a reasonably equivalent substitute residence and We will repay You for the actual rent You pay, until the earlier of:
(1) the cause of the claim is removed; or
(2) We pay You the amount required by this Policy. If Your claim is covered only under Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 or 18, that payment is the amount of
Your insurance then in force for the particular Covered Risk.
(b) We will pay reasonable costs You pay to relocate any personal property You have the right to remove from the Land, inducing transportation of that
personal
property for up to twenty-five (25) miles from the Land, and repair of any damage to that personal property because of the relocation. The amount We
will pay
You under this paragraph is limited to the value of the personal property before You relocate it.
FirstAmerican Title
CLTA Homeowner's Polity of Title Insurance (612/98) Order Number: DEN - 2518970
ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (10/17/98) Page Number: 6
c.All payments We make under this Policy reduce the Policy Amount, except for costs, attorneys' Fees and expenses. All payments we make for claims which arc
covered only under Covered Risk 14,15,16 or 18 also reduce Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for the particular Covered Risk, except for costs, attorneys' fees
and expenses.
d.If We issue, or have issued, a policy to the owner of a Mortgage on Your Title and We have not given You any coverage against the Mortgage, then:
(1) We have the right to pay any amount due You under this Policy to the owner of the Mortgage to reduce the amount of the Mortgage, and any amount
paid shall be treated as a payment to You under this Policy, including under paragraph 4.a. of these Conditions;
(2) Any amount paid to the owner of the Mortgage shall be subtracted from the Policy Amount of this Policy; and
(3) If Your claim is covered only under Covered Risk 14,15,16 or 18, any amount paid to the owner of the Mortgage shall also be subtracted from Our
Maximum Dollar Limit
of Liability for the particular Covered Risk.
e.If You do anything to affect any right of recovery You may have against someone else, We can subtract from Our liability the amount by which You reduced the
value of that right
7.TRANSFER OF YOUR RIGHTS TO US
a. When We settle Your claim, We have all the rights You have against any person or property related to the claim. You must transfer these rights to Us when We
ask, and You must not do anything to affect these rights. You must let Us use Your name in enforcing these rights.
b. We will not be liable to You if We do not pursue these rights or if We do not recover any amount that might be recoverable.
c. We will pay any money We collect from enforcing these rights in the following order
(1) to Us for the costs, attomeys' fees and expenses We paid to enforce these rights;
(2) to You for Your loss that You have not already collected;
(3) to Us for any money We paid out under this Policy on account of Your claim; and
(4) to You whatever is left.
d.If You have rights under contracts (such as indemnities, guaranties, bonds or other policies of insurance) to recover all or part of Your loss, then We have all of
those rights, even if those contracts provide that those obligated have all of Your rights under this Policy.
&ENTIRE CONTRACT
This Policy, with any endorsements, is the entire contract between You and Us. To determine the meaning of any part of this Policy, You must read the entire
Policy. Any changes to this Policy must be agreed to in writing by Us. Any claim You make against Us must be made under this Policy and is subject to its terms.
9.INCREASED POLICY AMOUNT
The Policy Amount will increase by ten percent (10%) of the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A each year for the first five years following the policy date shown
in Schedule A, up to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the Policy Amount shown in Schedule A. The increase each year will happen on the anniversary of the
policy date shown in Schedule A.
SO.SEVERABILITY
If any part of this Policy is held to be legally unenforceable, both You and We can still enforce the rest of this Policy.
11.ARBITRATION
a.If permitted in the state where the land is located You or We may demand arbitration.
b.The arbibabon shall be binding on both You and Us. The arbitration shall decide any matter in dispute between You and Us.
c.The arbitration award may be entered as a judgment in the proper court.
d.The arbitration shall be under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. You may choose current Rules or Rules in existence
on the Policy Date.
e.The law used in the arbitration is the law of the place where the Land is located.
f.You can get a copy of the Rules from Us.
FirstAmerrcan Title insurance Company
F;Y 7 -S, !l' 'ACIENT
AT7cST �{, � SF.Cf+TAHY
FirstAmerican Title
CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (6/2/98)
ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (10/17/98)
SCHEDULE A
Premium: $1,956.00
Amount of Insurance: $822,000.00
Date of Policy: November 30, 2006 at 8:00 A.M.
Deductible Amounts and Maximum Dollar Limits of Liability
For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16, and 18:
Covered Risk 14
(Subdivision Law Violation):
Covered Risk 15
(Building Permit):
Covered Risk 16
(Zoning):
Covered Risk 18
(Encroachment of Boundary
Walls or Fences):
Your Deductible Amount
1% of Policy Amount
or
$2,500
(whichever is less)
1% of Policy Amount
or
$5,000
(whichever is less)
1% of Policy Amount
or
$5,000
(whichever is less)
1% of Policy Amount
or
$2,500
(whichever is less)
Order Number: DEN - 2518970
Page Number: 7
Policy Number: DEN - 2518970
Street Address of the Land:
1866 Sheridan Road, Encinitas, Califomia
FirstAmerican Title
Our Maximum Dollar
Limit of Liability
$10,000
$25,000
$25,000
$5,000
CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (6/2/98)
ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (10/17198)
SCHEDULE
(Continued)
1. Name of insured:
Order Number: DEN - 2518970
Page Number: 8
Matthew William Power and Celine Solange Power, husband and wife as joint tenants
2. Your interest in the land covered by this policy is:
A fee.
3. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows:
Real property in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, described as
follows:
PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18745, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO,
COUNTY, JULY 12, 2001 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 01- 479318 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
l!\d�lii[4rF7eII:�ibl
First American Title
CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (6/2/98)
ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (10/17/98)
EXCEPTIONS
Order Number: DEN - 2518970
Page Number: 9
In addition to the exclusions, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses
resulting from:
1. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2006 -2007.
First Installment:
Penalty:
Second Installment:
Penalty:
Tax Rate Area:
A. P. No.:
$2,140.47, PAID
$0.00
$2,140.47, OPEN
$0.00
19119
216 - 053 -65 -00
2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to Chapter 3.5 commencing with
Section 75 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code.
3. An easement shown or dedicated on the Map as referred to in the legal description
For: Drainage and embankment slopes and incidental purposes.
The location of the easement cannot be determined from record information.
4. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Covenant Regarding Real Property:
Improvements Required as Condition on Final Approval of Subdivision of Real Property"
recorded June 18, 2001 as Instrument No. 01- 407127 of Official Records.
5. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Covenant Regarding Real Property:
Hold City Harmless for Grading /Drainage" recorded June 18, 2001 as Instrument No. 01- 407128
of Official Records.
6. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Covenant Regarding Real Property:
Future Park, Traffic and Flood Control Fee" recorded June 18, 2001 as Instrument No. 01- 407129
of Official Records.
7. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Covenant Regarding Real Property:
Waiver of Protest to Assessments" recorded June 18, 2001 as Instrument No. 01- 407130 of
Official Records.
8. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Encroachment Maintenance and
Removal Covenant Encroachment Permit No. 6637 -PE" recorded June 18, 2001 as Instrument
No. 01- 407131 of Official Records.
First American Title
CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (6/2/98) Order Number: DEN - 2518970
ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (10/17/98) Page Number: 10
9. The Parcel Map referred to in the legal description herein contains various restrictions in
improving or developing the property herein described. Reference is made to said Parcel Map for
further particulars.
10. An easement for public utilities and incidental purposes, recorded March 28, 2002 as Instrument
No. 02- 260842 of Official Records.
In Favor of: San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a Corporation
Affects: The land
11. An easement for public utilities and incidental purposes, recorded December 12, 2002 as
Instrument No. 02- 1130696 of Official Records.
In Favor of: Coxcom, Inc. d /b /a Cox Communications San Diego, a
Corporation, its successors and assigns
Affects: The land
12. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Encroachment Maintenance
Covenant Encroachment Permit No. 6637 -PE" recorded February 4, 2003 as Instrument No. 03-
130317 of Official Records.
13. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the original principal amount of
$417,000.00 recorded November 30, 2006 as Document No.2006- 0849500 of Official Records.
Dated: November 16, 2006
Trustor: Matthew William Power and Celine Solange Power, husband and
wife as joint tenants
Trustee: First American Title of San Diego
Beneficiary: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., solely as
nominee for American Mortgage Express Corp.
14. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the original principal amount of
$240,600.00 recorded November 30, 2006 as Document N0.2006- 0849501 of Official Records.
Dated: November 17, 2006
Trustor: Matthew William Power and Celine Solange Power, husband and
wife as joint tenants
Trustee: Marin Conveyancing Corp.
Beneficiary: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., solely as
nominee for GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.
The map attached, if any, may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. First American
expressly disclaims any liability for loss or damage which may result from reliance on this map except to
the extent coverage for such loss or damage is expressly provided by the terms and provisions of the title
insurance policy, if any, to which this map is attached.
First American Title
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Matthew William Power and
Celine Solange Power, Trustees
1866 Sheridan Road "
Encinitas, CA 92024
-D
MAY 2 0 2008
7720
3 'Es
DOC # 2007-07115 1 9
ii!! IIIII IIII!III!I!IIII IIIII!IIII I!III IIIII IIIII IIIII III! III
NOV 08. 2007 3:58 PM
0 REC JHDS
�AFI r NE uo t1'RErURDEH OFF I L E
6REu0P'. d SMITH COU14Tl RECORDER
FEES 800
uC 0C
PACES:
INlli Nlli tllll NIII IIIII Nlli tlll! NIII tlill NIII VIII NIII VIII tllll NII INI
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ None SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
Computed on the consideration or value of property conveyed, OR
Computed on the consideration or value less liens or
encumbrances remaining at time of sale.
X Transfer to Family Trust Signature of Declarant or Agent Determining Tax - Firm Name
QUITCLAIM DEED
APN: 216 - 053 -65 -00
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Matthew William Power and
Celine Solange Power, Husband and Wife, as Joint Tenants, do hereby REMISE, RELEASE AND FOREVER
QUITCLAIM to Matthew William Power and Celine Solange Power, Trustees of Power Family Trust of 2005,
u/d/t dated November 28, 2005, the real property located in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of
California, described as:
Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 18745, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of
California, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 12, 2001 as
Instrument No. 01- 479318 of Official Records.
DATED: f �1
DATED �$� , 2007
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)ss
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
tthew William Power
I
Celine Solang
On W '� 1 2007, before me, neb v , be I r rrt r1 [r) Notary Public, personally appeared Matthew William Power
and Celine Solange Power, or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose
names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacity, and
that by their signature on the instrument the persons or the entity upon behalf of which the persons acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature ktkj�
4MY MARI9EL FRANCO COMML5S u 1523296
Notary RteYC - CaAfomio
Sat Dlepo County Comm. Erm9M Oct 30.2009
r, � t" i 'r r • , r f, {
ti.l.;;;f.:it : l:i 1, t to taz'
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
First American Title Company rd' d''.� (iJ L; P.:c.r �: (j(d r° t"i
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Matthew William Power and Celine Solange
Power
1866 Sheridan Road
Encinitas, CA 92024
4696 " :k it ;f G�
2006- 0849499
A.P.N.: 216- 053 -65 -00 File No.: DEN - 2518970 (PH)
GRANT DEED
The Undersigned Grantor(s) Declare(s): DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $904.20; C[TY TRANSFER TAX $0.00;
x computed on the consideration or full value of property conveyed, OR
computed on the consideration or full value less value of liens and /or encumbrances remaining at time of sale,
unincorporated area; I x ) City of Encinitas, and
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Stuart Newby- Fraser, a single
man
hereby GRANTS to Matthew William Power and Celine Solange Power, husband and wife as joint
tenants
the following described property in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California:
PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18745, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO,
COUNTY, IULY 12, 2001 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 01- 479318 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
Dated: 09 101/2006
Mail Tax Statements To: SAME AS ABOVE
A.P.N.: 216 053 -65 -00 Grant Deed - continued File No.:DEN- 2518970 (PH)
Date: 09/01/2006
STATE OF CALIFORNIA } 4698
} ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO }
On G I before
me, k iYLE v (10 a ry • bli personally
appeared S TUA -art C DX " t=RASfiz -
-
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose
name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same
in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies) and that his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s) or the
entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
My Commis5'oWixpires: O 1
This area for official notarial seal
Notary Name: �F F I11,i L f L Notary Phone: o) y4- 3 e
Notary Registration Number: County of Principal Place of Business: /
OFFICIAL SEAL
7 JEFF YAEGER
NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA �3
COMM. NO. 1436113
SAN DIEGO COUNW
o,,iy CCM 25, M. EXP. AUG. Z5, 2007
Page 3 of 3
Fvoou rce JN08 -0016
Development July 9, 2008
Corporation Page 1 of 7
CML ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING
HYDROLOGY and STORM WATER DETENTION CALCULATIONS
POWER RESIDENCE
1866 SHERIDAN ROAD, ENCINITAS
Hydrology and Drainage Design Calculations by:
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
`
BRIAN
iku DONALD
No. 26175
;s CIVIL
P offfessioona
Brian Donald, RCE 26175
yTFOF
License Expires 3/31/2010
1.t
CAS.
2410 5TROM15EFG CIRCLE • CARL56AP, CA 92010 • TEL (760)942 -1106 • FAX (760) 730 -3059
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2410 Stromberg Circle
Carlsbad, California 92010
(760) 942 -1106 rdc @rdc2000.com
-::5n t , `T -Yr-D;z7
JOB 'mot ^ ICJ 1
SHEET NO Z OF
CALCLAATEDBY DATE f
CHECKED BY DATE
.W
�r
SIZE
J�
County of San Diego
Hydrology Manual
m,yse.y<coo<
u®u
O GaiA
G G s SITE
G Gocc
Coco
D wew.+n.s
Baae�n ��aa��
.MO...M&..n.:...«.a
a.ro....ran
v.��nmwamwe
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2410 Stromberg Circle
Carlsbad, California 92010
(760) 942.1106 rdc @rdc2000.com
SHEET NO
OF
CALCULATED BY DATE
CHECKED BY
tai. -I F:2kc 1J7 f=,J-1 r r v
DATE
Counly of San Diego
Hydro" M anual
a
y4�OMlyd
1�,\ P6 = 2.5 INCHES
SITE ,
err ✓ . •. \..r. ;
i i }
' �.�), i
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CORP. Sr, JOB
Et�no oa - a� 1
OF
Stromberg Circle / l
Carlsbad, California 92010 cAUxxArEnev rte/ DAM S
(760) 942 -1106 rdc @rdc2000.com
CHECKED BY OATS
County of San Diego
eyriGr // Hydrology M anal
-21 Ma
P24 = 4.0 INCHES
SITE - - "'^ 74° \,. �� �. •��. �.
l
N
o^)E:
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CORP. 4
SHEET ND.
2410 Stromberg Circle OF
Carlsbad, California 92010 CALCULATED BY DATE 5�1
(760) 942.1106 rdc @rdc2000.com ` f
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE
Directions for Application:
(1) From peapiWbon maps delertnrte 6 tr and 24 tv arnounts
t
for the selected frequency. These maps are ncWe7 in the
EQUATION
i
Co13ny Hydrology Manual (10, 50, and 100 yrrrms included
I = 7.44 PB D -0.615
u
in the Design and Procedure Manual).
I = Intensity (irvhr)
(2) Adjust 6 hr precipitation fit recessa7l so that it is within
P6 = 6 -Hour Precipitation (n)
1
the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 h t precpaatan (rat
appllcaple to Desert).
D = Duration (min)
Gfill 7AP
(3) Plot 6 In precipaahon on the right side of the chart
1
(4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the pbtfed fines
4N
331
630 616 TA!
421 Ella aa0
g484
iae:a" an
129!111 621
2W "!20'962
1.T2 W2,11
1.N 1.m aL0
lY
814
SV
481
31.13
an
tae
1as
(5) This line is the inlensay-0uraaon curve for the lo at"
\ „
11.
an
TO
6118
616
-4Y!
file
62
11
10.11
7W
941
660
41111
413
4/
!
being analyzed
Application Form:
i (a) Selected frequency 100 year
(b) P6 = 2_5 m.. P24 = 4_0 ,?6 = 62
w
sa � (c) Aglwed P6RI = 25 a1. P24
6s a (d)a= _ mn. nimum)
60 50 Mi (
8
41 a)I= 6_6 Koh, .
4.0
3'5 — Note: This chart replaces the Iraenaity- Duraton- Frequency
3.0 curves used since 1965.
25
2.0
15
10
MinuMe Haas
0.0,,n
Intensity-Duration Design Chart - Template
HuMpvCwity Hyyo„daay Manyldnt Dm pspn CM1ertFHB
3 -1
t
a
11.5 3
i
4
-I
a
t
u
1
I
I I. 1
1
Gfill 7AP
1
_Y tt! 610
4N
331
630 616 TA!
421 Ella aa0
g484
iae:a" an
129!111 621
2W "!20'962
1.T2 W2,11
1.N 1.m aL0
lY
814
SV
481
31.13
an
tae
1as
.p
a"
"
464
3T!
all
aN
in
1.1(
tlee
4.!
4.o
O.A
iy
4.15
41.16
aw"
'37ra
131
11.
an
TO
6118
616
-4Y!
file
62
11
10.11
7W
941
660
41111
413
4/
!
1 in.,.
101 i.
ON 1. —3
an 1A
4 4 m 1.
mlium-
616
lW
126
Im
.H
1 1 iiai'ata
1m 1 tq
o2e 1. tee
1m
fib
1.111i
IV
!AI
is
a
o.ro o2e t m
I w
1st
,_
18
116
tw -a
am
o3s aro 1161
t1M
1.N
1.31
121
tm
a
1124 o1e
rim
o
1.66
lea
1211
o
ase
nn o2e oee
un
-016
it
n1a
ma
a
11]9
1
626
1.10
Im
o T-
as
oaoso- oaa'pm
3 -1
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2410 Stromberg Circle
Carlsbad, California 92010
(760) 942 -1106 rdc @rdc2000.com
Land Use
JOB C - C)CD i
SHEET NO clie DE
CALCULATED BY DATE ()
CHECKED BY DATE -
Table 3 -1
RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR URBAN AREAS
NRCS Elements County Elements
Undisturbed Natural Terrain
Permanent Open Space
Low
Residential, 1.0 DU /A or less
Low
Residential, 2.0 DU /A or less
Low
Residential, 2.9 DU /A or less
Medium Density Residential
Residential, 4.3 DU /A or less
Medium Density Residential
Residential, 7.3 DU /A or less
Medium Density Residential
Residential, 10.9 DU /A or less
Medium Density Residential
Residential, 14.5 DU /A or less
High Density Residential
Residential, 24.0 DU /A or less
High Density Residential
Residential, 43.0 DU /A or less
Commercial/Industrial
Neighborhood Commercial
Commercial/Industrial
General Commercial
CommerciaUlndustrial
Office Professional/Commercial
CommerciaUlndustrial
Limited Industrial
Commercial/Industrial
General Industrial
•The values usociated with 01e impervious may be used for direct calculation o
runoff coefficient Cp, for the soil type), or for areas that will remain undisturb
forever (e.g., the area is located in Cleveland National Forest).
DU /A = dwelling units per acre
NRCS =National Resources Conservation Service
Runoff Coefficient "C
Soil Type
% IMPER. A B C D
0-
0-20
0.25
0.30
0.35
]0
0.27
0.32
0.36
0.41
20
0.34
0.38
0,42
0.46
25
0.38
0.41
045
0.49
30
0.41
0.45
0.48
0.52
40
0.48
0.51
0.54
0.57
45
0.52
0.54
0.57
0.60
50
0.55
0.58
0.60
0.63
65
0.66
0.67
0.69
0.71
80
0.76
0.77
0.78
0.79
80
0.76
0.77
0.78
0.79
85
0.80
0.80
0.81
0.82
90
0.83
0.84
0.84
0.85
90
0.83
0.84
0.84
0.85
95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
the runoff coefficient as described in Section 3.1.2 (representing the pervious
d m perpetuity. Justification must be given that the area will remain natural
7GCS Cv'1 <'.' �`74�1lI0 ✓7 - /- lr"�Jv1f'YtE Nt 1 � e
a ,
0 �MFty-J IOJS % G " d .� 7
`1 L = cD. -57 - 0. = n , I z�;-
r
RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CORP.
2410 Stromberg Circle
Carlsbad, California 92010
(760) 942.1106 rdc @rdc2000.com
JOB ✓U -6 -J I
SHEET NO.- % OF
CALCULATED By_ DATE 1
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE -
Hyrology and Detention Volume Calculations
Site Runoff - 100 Year Peak Flow - Pre- Construction
Q= C'I'A
A (Site) C I Qrunoff
acres runoff coef in /hr
0.45 0.42 6.6 1.25 cfs
Site Runoff - 100 Year Peak Flow - Post - Construction
Q= C'I'A
A (Site) C I Qrunoff
acres runoff coef in /hr
0.45 0.57 6.6 1.69 cfs
Increase in 100 Year Peak Flow
delta Q100 = Q100post - Q100pre = 0.45 cfs
Detention Volume Required to Maintain Peak Discharge Rate
V = delta Q100 ' 1.5 ' 2.65 - Tc
1.5 =
Gravel Void Factor =
1.50
2.65 =
Emperical Scale Factor =
2.65
Tc =
Time of Concentraion =
60 secs
Minimum Detention Pit Volume = 106 ftA3
/vo %Dave Trarmv�c for m�n..m,,m 1r�Ylon vO��.nC
G1 e"- C�'pcci b.� G41 c;n L kcs>
Ar_ Lam, l Pt+ Ua Ouroe- _ kzo 4`2
Irk
PRE - EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
SCALE: 1"= 20'
0 10 20 30 40 50
PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = (1,300 + 1,000) x 100 / 19,636 = 12%
1 11 'l
11
, N
11
❑E
CIE
'11 DE DE DE OE OE DE DE '--- -- ❑E _'_'-� pE
_G— !i T� =__ Ct .tom Ca �d—� - --Ci —Ti W —_ G W— G W C>_
W — W — W — ' -" — W — W — W W SHERIDAN ROAD
ewe.wM.eo W -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- —
- - — — — S5
1 \ S S -- S ew�rrn�r
S —}— S— S S S S S— S— S S S S S S—
CIE DE�o r� -- —' - -'— — --
1 pE OE oC1E OE r - - --
`�.� OE _ CIE
E DE
DE CIE OE
,-
P\
C1 \\
11 J EXISTING HOUSE t
1,300 sq ft Footprint 1 1
EXISTING PATIO J'1
1•OOD sq ft LANDSCAPE
1 N, >.'..A LANDSCAPE
0 I1.k• 4 ' 1 r' ' '1 1,
n: a PROJECT SITE
19.636 sq ft J EE T i F
SHEE
1 1
1 I,l N 7 L O 17
11 p:, T�� 1
lk
LANDSCAPE
o �
r q 11. "... •.i1 .4 _" 1
Vk
VI
l
❑E
POST- CONSTRUCTION SITE CONDITIONS
SCALE: 1'= 20'
0 10 20 30 40 50
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA = HOUSE + GUEST HOUSE + DRIVEWAYS & PATIOS + DECKS = 8,050 sq ft
PERCENT IMPERVIOUS = 8,050 x 100 / 19,636 = 41%
agaiiia—Z°
it (]E OE �E ❑E ]E — OE GE OE OE
OE
N
n
OE 30
t— G "I sm. — G. r - -G - -Ti —= — -�., — G G w G-- ali — 7"i1o�T W -- G_ W —G W — . CG- -
1 .— — W — W �� "' " — W — W SHERIDAN ROAD
-- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- -- -- - - - -- ----- -- �tee•orm
S S —
S S -- S S-
S S S S c -_ S S as
S —
DES
1 f .. ..> ....:..: ; ';•..�. ...' ' .H }." L.- .-]n; ,kD6,�TIiE1{V.ALIt ...'.: ...- � -.'�, • ��.._. .J_• . _.:,.�: � r
4
a 11.
N..
N N:
11 N
N
N
,1' ",
C1 N
N
N
CN
tl
t1
11
n •�
N
IN
N
11
1N
11 /`
N
tl
N
1a
1
11
G t0
11
11
11
U
c�
�wvr
1 1 0
1 � �
s
i.:
n
L 11
LANDSCAPE
DRIVEWAY
LANDSCAPE ••
325sq ft.
�
es
LANDSCAPE � '
QRIYEWAY AND PAR �Ny
1
LANDSCAPE
ENTRYPA'IIb'.' ••
----- - - - -_. ''' -.. - J2¢sgft_�., '.
II
350 sq.ft __._..._......
..
t
es
NEW HOUSE,
; />
r
4,600 sq ft Footprinai_
LANDSCAPE '1
\
LANDSCAPE
°j
DECK
\\
600 sq ft
,
• In LANDSCAPE
~SIDEWALK'
• •. PAl f0.. • es.' •
)
�r _
�
4
w `
_
8f70 ft
-0
V) CL
�tionPit
Deter
e. 0 0
�'.� s�.
^ w
_ 1i
�i,
u Q
POOL
LANDSCAPE _' —
�' t
N $
1,000sgft
w
(No Runoff)
n
Gregory
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK
RECORDERICOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
1600 Pacific Highway, Room 260 www.sdarcc.com 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 103
P.O. Box 121750 • San Diego, CA 92112 -1750 San Diego, CA 92101 -2480
Tel. (619) 238 -8158' Fax (619) 557 -4155 Tel. (619) 236 -3771 • Fax (619) 557-4056
BATCH #: 247673920081113
DOCUMENT #'S: 2008 - 0591108
RECORDING DATE: NOV l3, 2008
3:32 PM
RECORDING:
10.00
ADD'L RECORDING:
6.00
MICROGRAPHICS:
1.00
TRIAL COURT:
5.00
REDACTION:
1.00
ERECORDING:
1.00
TOTAL DUE: 24.00
TOTAL TENDERED: 24.00
For your convenience, we are now taking appointments to obtain a marriage license starting June 17th, 2008.
Call today to schedule your appointment. Downtown office: 619 - 531 -5088. Branch offices: 858 -505 -6197.
SERVICES AVAILABLE AT
OFFICE LOCATIONS
• Tax Bill Address Changes
• Records and Certified Copies:
Birth/ Marriage/ Death/ Real Estate
• Fictitious Business Names (DBAs)
• Marriage Licenses and Ceremonies
• Assessor Parcel Maps
• Property Ownership
• Property Records
• Property Values
• Document Recordings
SERVICES AVAILABLE ON-LINE AT
www.sdarcc.com
• Forms and Applications
• Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
• Grantor/ Grantee index
• Fictitious Business Names Index (DBAs)
• Property Sales
• Weddings on the Web
• On -Line Purchases
Assessor Parcel Maps
Property Characteristics
Recorded Documents
BRANCH OFFICES AVAILABLE TO SERVE YOU
Monday through Friday 8:00 am - 5:00 p.m
Saturdays at the Kearny Mesa Office 9:00 am - 3:00 p.m.
CHULA VISTA EL CAJON KEARNY MESA
590 Third Avenue 200 South Magnolia Ave. 9225 Clairetrtont Mesa Blvd.
Chula Vista, CA 91910 -2646 El Cajon, CA 92020 -3316 San Diego, CA 92123 -1211
(619) 498 -2277 (619) 401 -5750 (858) 505 -6226
SAN MARCOS
141 E Cannel Street
San Marcos, CA 92078 -4309
(760) 940 -6858
ENCROACHMENT MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL COVENANT
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. J5?_- PE
A.P.N.: Zl6 -053- 65 Project No: &52'6
tO*-037 COP)
An encroachment permit is hereby granted to the Permittee designated in paragraph one,
Exhibit "A ", as the owner of the Benefited property described in paragraph two, Exhibit "A," to
encroach upon City Property described in paragraph three, Exhibit "A ", as detailed in the diagram,
Exhibit "B ". Exhibit "A" and "B" are hereby incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set
forth at length. In consideration of the issuance of this encroachment permit, Permittee hereby
covenants and agrees, for the benefit of the City, as follows:
1. This covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees,
and assigns of the respective parties.
2. Permittee shall use and occupy the City Property only in the manner and for the purpose
described in paragraph four, Exhibit "A ".
3. By accepting the benefits herein, Permittee acknowledges title to the City Property to be in
the City and waives all right to contest that title.
4. The term of the encroachment permit is indefinite and may be revoked by the City and
abandoned by Permittee at any time. The city shall mail written notice of revocation to
Permittee, addressed to the Benefited Property which shall set forth the date upon which
the benefits of encroachment permit are to cease.
5. City is entitled to remove all or a portion of the improvements constructed by Permittee in
order to repair, replace, or install public improvements. City shall have no obligation to pay
for or restore Permittee's improvements.
6. Permittee agrees to hold harmless, defend and indemnify from and against all claims,
demands, costs, losses, damages, injuries, litigation, and liability arising out of or related to
the use, construction, encroachment or maintenance to be done by the Permittee or
Permittee's agents, employees or contractors on City Property.
7. Upon abandonment, revocation, completion, or termination, Permittee shall, at no cost to
the city, return City Property to its pre - permit condition within the time specified in the notice
of revocation or prior to the date of abandonment.
THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT
WAS RECORDED ON NOV 13. 2008
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND,
) DOCUMENT NUMBER 2008 - 0591108
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
GREGORY J. SMITH. COUNTY RECORDER
)
\y
SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE
TIME -. 3.32 RM
CITY CLERK
)
CITY OF ENCINITAS
)
505 SOUTH VULCAN AVENUE
)
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
)
SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE
ENCROACHMENT MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL COVENANT
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. J5?_- PE
A.P.N.: Zl6 -053- 65 Project No: &52'6
tO*-037 COP)
An encroachment permit is hereby granted to the Permittee designated in paragraph one,
Exhibit "A ", as the owner of the Benefited property described in paragraph two, Exhibit "A," to
encroach upon City Property described in paragraph three, Exhibit "A ", as detailed in the diagram,
Exhibit "B ". Exhibit "A" and "B" are hereby incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set
forth at length. In consideration of the issuance of this encroachment permit, Permittee hereby
covenants and agrees, for the benefit of the City, as follows:
1. This covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees,
and assigns of the respective parties.
2. Permittee shall use and occupy the City Property only in the manner and for the purpose
described in paragraph four, Exhibit "A ".
3. By accepting the benefits herein, Permittee acknowledges title to the City Property to be in
the City and waives all right to contest that title.
4. The term of the encroachment permit is indefinite and may be revoked by the City and
abandoned by Permittee at any time. The city shall mail written notice of revocation to
Permittee, addressed to the Benefited Property which shall set forth the date upon which
the benefits of encroachment permit are to cease.
5. City is entitled to remove all or a portion of the improvements constructed by Permittee in
order to repair, replace, or install public improvements. City shall have no obligation to pay
for or restore Permittee's improvements.
6. Permittee agrees to hold harmless, defend and indemnify from and against all claims,
demands, costs, losses, damages, injuries, litigation, and liability arising out of or related to
the use, construction, encroachment or maintenance to be done by the Permittee or
Permittee's agents, employees or contractors on City Property.
7. Upon abandonment, revocation, completion, or termination, Permittee shall, at no cost to
the city, return City Property to its pre - permit condition within the time specified in the notice
of revocation or prior to the date of abandonment.
8. If Permittee fails to restore the City Property, the City shall have the right to enter upon the
City Property, after notice to the Permittee, delivered at the Benefited Property, and restore
the City Property to its pre - permit condition to include the removal and destruction of any
improvements and Permittee agrees to reimburse the city for the costs incurred. Notice
may be given by first class mail sent to the last known address of the Permittee, which shall
be deemed effective three calendar days after mailing, or by any other reasonable method
likely to give actual notice.
9. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this covenant, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement for all costs, including reasonable
attorney's fees.
10. Permittee shall agree that Permittee's duties and obligations under this covenant are a lien
upon the Benefited Property. Upon 30 -day notice, and an opportunity to respond, the City
may add to the tax bill of the Benefited Property any past due financial obligation owing to
city by way of this covenant.
11. Permittee waives the right to assert any claim or action against the City arising out of or
resulting from the revocation of this permit or the removal of any improvements or any other
action by the City, its officers, agents, or employees taken in a manner in accordance with
the terms of the permit.
12. Permittee recognizes and understands that the permit may create a possessory interest
subject to property taxation and that the permittee may be subject to the payment of
property taxes levied on such interest.
13. As a condition precedent to Permittee's right to go upon the City Property, the agreement
must first be signed by the Permittee, notarized, executed by the City and recorded with the
County Recorder of the County of San Diego. The recording fee shall be paid by Permittee
14. Approved and issued by the City of Encinitas, California, this _ day of 20_
Dated: tC7 f O
Owner /Permittee Signature
Owne ermittee Print
Dated: 10 ^
Owne Permittee Signature
Owner /Permittee Print
(Notarization of PERMI ig i is c ed)
Dated: 4O 1
/A/. APeter Cota- Robles
Engineering Service Director, City of Encinitas
ATTACHMENT "A "TO COVENANT
REGARDING ENROACHMENT PERMIT No. 952 -PE
PARAGRAPH ONE:
PERMITTEE:
Matthew William Power and Celine Solange Power, Trustees of Power Family Trust of
2005 dated November 28, 2005
PARAGRAPH TWO:
BENEFITTED PROPERTY:
All that land as described in Quitclaim Deed, Doc No. 2007- 0711519 recorded November
8, 2007 in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County
PARAGRAPH THREE:
CITY PROPERTY:
That portion of Andrew Avenue and Sheridan Road, in the City of Encinitas. County of
San Diego, State of California as shown on Parcel Map No. 18745 recorded in Office of
the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 12, 2001, laying adjacent to the
northerly and easterly boundaries of Parcel 3 of said Parcel Map No. 18745.
PARAGRAPH FOUR:
PURPOSE:
To allow the construction of a turfblock and gravel drainage swale adjacent to the
southerly edge of the existing pavement in Andrew Avenue and the westerly
edge of the existing pavement in Sheridan Road at the above described location,
and to require the maintenance of the drainage Swale within the public right -of-
way of Andrew Avenue and Sheridan Road described in Paragraph Three above
ATTACHMENT "B" TO COVENANT
REGARDING ENCROACHMENT PERMIT No. 952 -PE
APN 216 - 053-65 SCALE: 1" = 40'
0 20 40 60 80 100
I
AvE�iE �•i I
A�pREW
urfblock and Gravel Swale3„ k/
to be Maintained- -�
1
Itn
66 HERIDAN ROAD I p
AP 216 - 053 -65 I°
Iz
1
1� to N
1
[:tit
i0
1
1
1 1 �T l rfblock nd Gravel Swale
1 1 i to b Maintained
— — — — — — — — —
1
1
1
1
1
1 I
1
11 --- - - - - --
ACKNOWLEDGMENTGv, roc KCAM". nanpe
and ZrMOV41 GOVCr1cky\3�-
E nLr�Cl,cnen� �t mi � 'irk
State of Califoryia
County of :Z::)G tea0 )
on OCR 10 4 aOO before me, �`flC'aC1bc1 m aln title N � j3u61Ic
(insert name and of the officer)
personally appeared 1 e L r
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person s whose nam s ju)are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heh~hey executed the same in
his/Her /their authorized capacit le ,and that by laiefherltheir signatur®s on the instrument the
persoros or the entity upon behalf of which the persollo acted, executed the instrument.
1 certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
MARIBEL FRANCO"�
WITNESS my hand and official seal. Commission a 1523286 `
Notary Public - California
San Diego County
`
My Comm. Expires Oct 30, 2008
SignatureV6i&— —F rGnL0 (Seal)
State of California
County of ✓�
CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE
CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT
On (V &6tg before me, OW ��Ll�7JCJ�P, �f%(1� Y AC/0416
(here insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared P£/ _Z/e
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(seh re subscribed to
the within instrument and acknowled ed to me tha (9she /they executed the same i his er /their
authorized capacity(ies), and that b s er /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity
upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the 110"
State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. f RANDA G. MILUOUR
Commission 01709661 yy<
Notwy pubMC - CrliHOmla la
WITNESS my hand and official seal. � y� sari oiyo "Canty it
bm:....... UP. Jan. 6, 2011
Signature����«�
U1 (Seal)
OPTIONAL INFORMATION
Although the information in this section is not required bylaw, it could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this
acknowledgment to on unauthorized document and may prove useful to persons relying on the attached document.
Description of Attached Document
The preceding Certificate of Acknowledgment is attached to a document
titled /for the purpose of
containing pages, and dated
The signer(s) capacity or authority is/are as:
❑ Individual(s)
❑ Attomey -in -Fact
❑ Corporate Officers)
❑ Guardian/Conwrvator
❑ Partrser - Limited/General
❑ Trustee(s)
❑ other:
representing:
Names) of Person(s) or EnOry0e9 Signer Is Representing
Method of Signer Identification
Roved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence.
1-0 fonn(s) of identification O credible witness(es)
Notarial event is detailed in notaryjournal on:
Page N Entry A
Notary contact:
Other
❑ Additional Signef(s) ❑ Signer(s)Thumbprinnsl
0 Copyright 2007 Notary Rotary, Inc. 925 29th St, Des Moines. IA 50312 3612 form ACK03. 10/01. To re- order, call toll -free 1877 -349 -6598 or visit us on the Internet at hnp9 /w riv innaryrotaiy cons
ff
EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION
AND ENGINEERING, INC.
10925 RARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I"
SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071
(619) 258 -7901
Fax 258 -7902
Matt & Celine Power
1866 Sheridan Road
Encinitas, California 92024
Subject: Limited Geotechnical Investigation
Power Residence
1866 Sheridan Road
City of Encinitas, California 92024
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Power:
Nov 3 2008
May 15, 2008
Project No. 08- 1147A2
In accordance with your request, we have performed a limited geotechnical investigation at the
subject site to provide the soil engineering criteria for site grading and recommend an appropriate
foundation system for the proposed single - family residence and attached guesthouse.
Our investigation has found that the subject site is underlain by topsoil and slopewash to a
maximum depth of approximately 4 feet below existing grade. Dense sandstone of the Terrace
Deposits Formation was underlying the slopewash to the explored depth of 7.0 feet. It is our
opinion that the proposed development is geotechnically feasible provided the recommendations
herein are implemented in the design and construction.
Should you have any questions with regard to the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to
contact our office.
Respectfully submitted, qw"'
�O �o s.
No. CEa 27C.
Exp: .q
Mamadou Saliou Diallo, P.E.
RCE 54071, GE 2704
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION................................................................_............................... ..............................A
SCOPEOF SERVICES ........................................................................................ ..............................A
SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ........................... ..............................5
GEOLOGY.............................................................................................................
..............................5
GeologicSett ing
..............................5
........................................................................................
Site Strati h
.5
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION ...........................................
Compressible Soils ...........................................................
ExpansiveSoils .................................. ...............................
Groundwater....................................... ...............................
GeologicHazards ............................... ...............................
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
GRADING AND EARTHWORK .................
Clearing and Grubbing .............................
Structural Improvement of Soils ..............
Transitions Between Cut and Fill ............
Method and Criteria of Compaction ........
Placement of Oversized Rock ..................
Erosion Control ......... ...............................
Standard Grading Guidelines ...................
FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS .... ...............................
RETAININGWALLS .................... ...............................
SETTLEMENT............................... ...............................
PERMANENTSLOPES .................................. ...............................
TEMPORARY SLOPES AND CUTS ............ ...............................
TRENCHBACKFILL ..................................... ...............................
DRAINAGE................................................... ..................._...........
FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW .................. ...............................
2
...... ............................... _ ....6
...................... ..............................6
...................... ..............................6
...................... ..............................7
7
.............7
.............7
.............8
.................. ..............................8
.. ......... ..............................9
........ 10
........ 12
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
PLATES
Plate 1- Location of Exploratory Boreholes
Plate 2 — Summary Sheet (Exploration Borehole Logs)
Plate 3 — USCS Soil Classification Chart
.................12
13
LABORATORYTESTING ................................................................................. .............................16
REFERENCES...................................................................._............................. ............................... 17
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
INTRODUCTION
This is to present the findings and conclusions of a limited geotechnical investigation for a
proposed single - family residence to be located at 1866 Sheridan Road, in the City of Encinitas,
California.
The objectives of the investigation were to evaluate the existing soils conditions and provide
recommendations for the proposed development.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following services were provided during this investigation:
O Site reconnaissance and review of published geologic, seismological and geotechnical reports
and maps pertinent to the project area
O Subsurface exploration consisting of four (4) boreholes within the limits of the proposed area
of development. The boreholes were logged by our Staff Geologist.
O Collection of representative soil samples at selected depths. The obtained samples were sealed
in moisture - resistant containers and transported to the laboratory for subsequent analysis.
O Laboratory testing of samples representative of the types of soils encountered during the field
investigation
O Geologic and engineering analysis of the field and laboratory data, which provided the basis
for our conclusions and recommendations
O Production of this report, which summarizes the results of the above analysis and presents our
findings and recommendations for the proposed development
SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The subject site is an approximately 19,600 - square foot, irregular- shaped residential lot located at
the southwest corner of Sheridan Road and Andrew Avenue, in the City of Encinitas, California.
The property which is occupied by a single -story house slopes gently to the west. Vegetation
consists of grass, shrub and trees. Boundaries include Sheridan Road to the east, Andrew Avenue to
the north and residential developments to the remaining directions. Access to the property is from
Sheridan Road.
The architectural plans prepared by Adams Design Associates, Inc. of Solana Beach, California
indicate that the existing house will be demolished and replaced with a bigger residence including a
guesthouse and a swimming pool. Associated improvements will include concrete driveways and
parking, concrete patio, landscaping and other appurtenances. It is our understanding that the
structure will be one and two -story, wood- framed and founded on continuous footings with a slab -
on -grade floor.
4
MATT & CEUVE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
On April 30 and May 8, 2008, four (4) boreholes were drilled to a maximum depth of
approximately 7.0 feet below existing grade with a hand auger. The approximate locations of the
boreholes are shown on the attached Plate No. 1, entitled "Location of Exploratory Boreholes". A
continuous log of the soils encountered was recorded at the time of drilling and is shown on Plate
No. 2 entitled "Summary Sheet ". The soils were visually and texturally classified according to the
filed identification procedures set forth on the attached Plate No. 3 entitled "USCS Soil
Classification'.
Following the field exploration, laboratory testing was performed to evaluate the pertinent
engineering properties of the foundation materials. The laboratory- testing program included
moisture and density, maximum density and optimum moisture content, particle size analysis and
expansion index tests. These tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM standards and
other accepted methods. Page L -1 and Plate No. 2 provide a summary of the laboratory test results.
GEOLOGY
Geologic Settin¢
The subject site is located within the southern portion of what is known as the Peninsular Ranges
Geomorphic Province of California. The coastal areas of the province in Encinitas are typically made
up of Pleistocene marine terrace deposits (Qt).
Site StratlgraphV
The subsurface descriptions provided are interpreted from conditions exposed during the field
investigation and/or inferred from the geologic literature. As such, all of the subsurface conditions
may not be represented. Detailed descriptions of the subsurface materials encountered during the field
investigation are presented on the exploration logs provided on Plate No. 2. The following paragraphs
provide general descriptions of the encountered soil types.
Topsoil
Topsoil is the surficial soil material that mantles the ground, usually containing roots and other organic
materials, which supports vegetation. Topsoil observed in the boreholes was approximately 12 to 18
inches thick and consisted of dark brown, silty sand that was dry, loose and porous in consistency with
minor amounts of organics (roots and rootlets).
Slopewash ( Osw )
Slopewash was found below the topsoil with a thickness of approximately 3 feet. The material
consisted of tan brown silty sand, fine - grained, dry and loose in consistency.
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
Marine Terrace Deposits ( Or )
Terrace deposits were observed below the slopewash layer. They generally consisted of tan, silty fine
sand. The moisture content ranged from dry to moist and the materials were medium dense to dense
in consistency.
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
Based on our investigation and evaluation of the collected information, we conclude that the proposed
structural development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided the recommendations
contained in this report will be properly implemented during structural development.
Based on the low expansion potential of the granular near - surface soils, it is our opinion that the
building pad may be constructed using the on -site materials. In order to provide a uniform support for
the structure, overexcavation and recompaction of the structural portion of the building pad will be
required. The foundations may consist of reinforced continuous footings with conventional reinforced
slabs. Recommendations and criteria for foundation design are contained in the Foundation and Slab
Recommendations section of this report.
Compressible Soils
Our field observations and testing indicate low compressibility within the sedimentary bedrock, which
underlies the entire site. However, loose topsoil and slopewash were typically encountered to a depth
of approximately 4 feet below surface grades. These soils are compressible. Due to the potential for
soil compression upon loading, remedial grading of these near - surface soils (including overexcavation
and recompaction) will be required.
Following implementation of the earthwork recommendations presented herein, the potential for soil
compression resulting from the new development has been estimated to be low. The low- settlement
assessment assumes a well - planned and maintained site drainage system. Recommendations
regarding mitigation by earthwork construction are presented in the Grading and Earthwork
Recommendations section of this report.
Expansive Soils
An expansion index test was performed on a representative sample of the slopewash to determine
volumetric change characteristics with change in moisture content. An expansion index of 0 was
obtained which indicate a very low expansion potential for the foundation soils.
Groundwater
Static groundwater was not encountered to the depths of the boreholes. The subject site is located
at an elevation of approximately 85 feet above Mean Sea Level. We do not expect groundwater to
affect the proposed construction. Recommendations to prevent or mitigate the effects of poor
surface drainage are presented in the Drainage section of this report.
N.
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
Geologic Hazards
A review of the active fault map pertaining to the site indicates the existence of the Rose Canyon
Fault Zone approximately 5.5 km to the west. Ground shaking from this fault or one of the major
active faults in the region is the most likely happening to affect the site. With respect to this
hazard, the site is comparable to others in the general area. The proposed residential structure
should be designed in accordance with seismic design requirements of the 2007 California Building
Code or the Structural Engineers Association of California using the following seismic design
parameters:
PARAMETER
VALUE
2007 CBC REFERENCE
Site Class
D
Table 1613.5.2
Mapped Spectral Acceleration For
Short Periods, S,
1.25
Figure 1613.5(3)
Mapped Spectral Acceleration For
a I- Second Period, S
0.5
Figure 1613.5(4)
Site Coefficient, F,
1.0
Table 1613.5.3(l)
Site Coefficient, F„
1.5
Table 1613.5.3 (2)
Based on the absence of shallow groundwater and consistency of the underlying Terrace Deposits
Formation, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction is very low.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon the analysis of the data and
information obtained from our soil investigation. This includes site reconnaissance; field
investigation; laboratory testing and our general knowledge of the soils native to the site. The site
is suitable for the proposed residential development provided the recommendations set forth are
implemented during construction.
GRADING AND EARTHWORK
Based upon our understanding of the preliminary plans and the information obtained during the field
investigation, we anticipate that the residential structure will be founded on continuous footings, which
are supported entirely by properly compacted fill. The following grading and earthwork
recommendations are based upon the limited geotechnical investigation performed, and should be
verified during construction by our field representative.
Clearing and Grubbing
All areas to be graded or to receive fill and/or structures should be cleared of vegetation. Vegetation
and the debris from the clearing operation should be properly disposed of off -site. The area should be
thoroughly inspected for any possible buried objects, which need to be rerouted or removed prior to
the inception of, or during grading. All holes, trenches, or pockets left by the removal of these objects
should be properly backfilled with compacted fill materials as recommended in the Method and
Criteria of Compaction section of this report.
7
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
Structural Improvement of Soils
information obtained from our field and laboratory analysis indicates that loose topsoil and slopewash
cover the site to a depth of approximately 4 feet below existing grade. These loose surficial soils are
susceptible to settlement upon loading. Based upon the soil characteristics and the grading plan, we
recommend the following:
Subgrade soils to a depth of approximately 4 feet below existing grade should be
overexcavated and recompacted. The bottom of the removal area should expose competent
materials as approved by ECSC &E geotechnical representative. Prior to the placement of new
fill, the bottom of the removal area should be scarified a minimum depth of 6 inches, moisture -
conditioned within 2 percent above the optimum moisture content, and then recompacted to at
least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D1557 test method). The limit of the required
area of overexcavation should be extended a minimum of 5 feet laterally beyond the perimeter
footing (building footprint).
For non - structural areas, such as driveways, we recommend overexcavation to a
minimum depth of 3 feet below existing grade.
Soils utilized as fill should be moisture - conditioned and recompacted in conformance
with the following Method and Criteria of Compaction section of this report. The
depth and extent of any overexcavation and recompaction should be evaluated in the
field by a representative of ECSC&E.
Transitions Between Cut and Fill
The proposed structure is anticipated to be founded entirely in properly compacted fill. Cut to fill
transitions below the proposed structure as shown on the grading plan should be completely eliminated
during the earthwork construction as required in the previous section.
Method and Criteria of Compaction
Compacted fills should consist of approved soil material, free of trash debris, roots, vegetation or other
deleterious materials. Fill soils should be compacted by suitable compaction equipment in uniform
loose lifts of 6 to 8 inches. Unless otherwise specified, all soils subjected to recompaction should be
moisture - conditioned within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content and recompacted to at least 90
percent relative compaction per ASTM test method D1557.
The on -site soils, after being processed to delete the aforementioned deleterious materials, may be
used for recompaction purposes. Should any importation of fill be planned, the intended import
source(s) should be evaluated and approved by ECSCE prior to delivery to the site. Care should be
taken to ensure that these soils are not detrimentally expansive.
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
Placement of Oversized Rock
All materials for capping the structural building pad should be free of rocks and debris in excess of 3-
inch dimension. Select fill should extend a minimum of 5 feet laterally outside the structural footprint.
Material up to 12 -inch dimension may be placed between 3 and 10 feet from finish grades, but must
remain at least 10 feet laterally from the face of permanent slopes and should also not be placed within
the alignment of proposed utilities.
Although we do not anticipate earthwork construction to create oversized material from 12 to 48
inches in dimension, if encountered, it may be placed in approved non - structural fill areas. The
oversized material should be placed in windrows surrounded by granular fill. The rock windrows
should be flooded with water to facilitate filling of voids. Care should be taken to avoid nesting of
oversize rocks and no large rock should be placed within 10 feet of any slope face. The non - structural
rockfill should be capped with a minimum 3 feet of fill containing no rocks greater than 6 -inch
dimension.
Erosion Control
Due to the granular characteristics of the on -site soils, areas of recent grading or exposed ground may
be subject to erosion. During construction, surface water should be controlled via berms, sandbags,
silt fences, straw wattles, siltation basins, positive surface grades or other method to avoid damage to
the finish work or adjoining properties. All site entrances and exits must have coarse gravel or steel
shaker plates to minimize offsite sediment tracking. Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be
used to protect storm drains and minimize pollution. The contractor should take measures to prevent
erosion of graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been
installed. After completion of grading, all excavated surfaces should exhibit positive drainage and
eliminate areas where water might pond.
Standard Grading Guidelines
Grading and earthwork should be conducted in accordance with the standard -of- practice methods for
this local, the guidelines of the current edition of the Uniform Building Code, and the requirements of
the jurisdictional agency. Where the information provided in the geotechnical report differs from the
Standard Grading Guidelines, the requirements outlined in the report shall govern.
FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS
a. Continuous and spread footings are suitable for use and should extend to a minimum depth of 12
inches for one —story and 18 inches for two -story structures into the properly compacted fill soils.
Continuous footings should be at least 12 and 15 inches in width respectively and reinforced with a
minimum of four #4 steel bars; two bars placed near the top of the footings and the other two bars
placed near the bottom of the footings.
b. Interior concrete floor slabs should be a minimum 4 inches thick. Reinforcement should consist
of #3 bars placed at 16 inches on center each way within the middle third of the slabs by supporting
the steel on chairs or concrete blocks "dobies ". The slabs should be underlain by 2 inches of clean
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
sand over a 10 -mil visqueen moisture barrier. The effect of concrete shrinkage will result in cracks
in virtually all - concrete slabs. To reduce the extent of shrinkage, the concrete should be placed at a
maximum of 4 -inch slump. The minimum steel recommended is not intended to prevent shrinkage
cracks.
c. Where moisture sensitive floor coverings are anticipated over the slabs, the 10 -mil plastic
moisture barrier should be underlain by a capillary break at least 2 inches thick, consisting of
coarse sand, gravel or crushed rock not exceeding 3/4 inch in size with no more than 5 percent
passing the 4200 sieve.
d. An allowable soil bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot may be used for the design of
continuous and spread footings at least 12 inches wide and founded a minimum of 12 inches into
properly compacted fill soils as set forth in the 2007 California Building Code, Table 1804.2. This
value may be increased by 400 psf for each additional foot of width or depth to a maximum value
of 4,000 lb /ft2.
e. Lateral resistance to horizontal movement may be provided by the soil passive pressure and the
friction of concrete to soil. An allowable passive pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of
depth may be used. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 is recommended. The soils passive pressure as
well as the bearing value may be increased by 1/3 for wind and seismic loading.
RETAINING WALLS
Cantilevered retaining walls should be designed for an "active" lateral earth pressure of 35 psf/ft (35
pcf EFP) for approved granular backfill and level backfill conditions. Where cantilevered walls
support 2:1 (hor:vert) sloping backfill, the equivalent active fluid pressure should be increased to 45
pcf. Cantilever walls subject to uniform surcharge loads should be designed for an additional uniform
lateral pressure equal to one -third (1/3) the anticipated surcharge pressure.
Restrained walls, such as basement walls should be designed utilizing an "at- rest" earth pressure of 60
psf/ft (60 pcf EFP) for approved granular and level backfill. Restrained walls subject to uniform
surcharge loads should be designed for an additional uniform lateral pressure equal to one -half (112)
the anticipated surcharge.
Soil design criteria, such as bearing capacity, passive earth pressure and sliding resistance as
recommended under the Foundation and Slab Recommendations section, may be incorporated into the
retaining wall design. The design and location of retaining walls should be reviewed by our firm for
conformance with our recommendations.
Footings should be reinforced as recommended by the structural engineer and appropriate back
drainage provided to avoid excessive hydrostatic wall pressures. As a minimum we recommend a
fabric - wrapped crushed rock and perforated pipe system. At least 2 cubic feet per linear foot of free -
drainage crushed rock should be provided.
The remaining wall backfill should consist of approved granular material. This fill material should
be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent as determined by ASTM D -1557
10
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
test method. Flooding or jetting of backfill should not be permitted. Granular backfill should be
capped with a minimum 18 inches of relatively impervious fill to seal the backfill and prevent
saturation.
It should be noted that the use of heavy compaction equipment in close proximity to retaining
structures can result in wall pressures exceeding design values and corresponding wall movement
greater than that associated with active or at -rest conditions. In this regard, the contractor should
take appropriate precautions during the backfill placement.
SETTLEMENT
Settlement of compacted fill soils is normal and should be anticipated. Because of the type and
minor thickness of the fill soils anticipated under the proposed footings and the light building loads,
total and differential settlements should be within acceptable limits.
PERMANENT SLOPES
Permanent cut slopes as shown on the grading plan are less than 5 feet in height and may be
constructed no steeper than 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). These slopes are anticipated to be grossly
stable. It is recommended that drought resistant vegetation be planted on the slope faces as soon a
practical to enhance their stability.
TEMPORARY SLOPES AND CUTS
For the excavation of foundations and utility trenches, temporary vertical cuts to a maximum height of
4 feet may be constructed in fill or natural soil. Any temporary cuts beyond the above height
constraints should be shored or further laid back following a 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope ratio.
OSHA guidelines for trench excavation safety should be implemented during construction.
TRENCH BACKFILL
Excavations for utility lines, which extend under structural areas should be properly backfilled and
compacted. Utilities should be bedded and backfilled with clean sand or approved granular soil to a
depth of at least one foot over the pipe. This backfill should be uniformly watered and compacted
to a firm condition for pipe support. The remainder of the backfill should be on -site soils or non -
expansive imported soils, which should be placed in thin lifts, moisture- conditioned and compacted
to at least 90% relative compaction.
DRAINAGE
Adequate measures should be undertaken to properly finish grade the site after the structure and
other improvements are in place, such that the drainage water within the site and adjacent
properties is directed away from the foundations, footings, floor slabs and the tops of slopes via
rain gutters, downspouts, surface swales and subsurface drains towards the natural drainage for this
area. A minimum gradient of 1 percent is recommended in hardscape areas. For earth areas, a
minimum gradient of 5 percent away from all structures for a distance of at least 5 feet should be
11
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
provided. Earth swales should have a minimum gradient of 2 percent. Drainage should be directed
to approved drainage facilities. Proper surface and subsurface drainage will be required to
minimize the potential of water seeking the level of the bearing soils under the foundations,
footings and floor slabs, which may otherwise result in undermining and differential settlement of
the structure and other improvements.
FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW
Our firm should review the foundation plans during the design phase to assure conformance with the
intent of this report. During construction, foundation excavations should be observed by our
representative prior to the placement of fomns, reinforcement or concrete for conformance with the
plans and specifications.
LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION
Our investigation was performed using the skill and degree of care ordinarily exercised, under similar
circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No
other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in
this report. This report is prepared for the sole use of our client and may not be assigned to others
without the written consent of the client and ECSC &E, Inc.
The samples collected and used for testing, and the observations made, are believed representative of
site conditions; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between exploration
trenches, boreholes and surface exposures. As in most major projects, conditions revealed by
construction excavations may vary with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions
must be evaluated by a representative of ECSC &E and designs adjusted as required or alternate
designs recommended.
This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his
representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the
attention of the project architect and engineer. Appropriate recommendations should be incorporated
into the structural plans. The necessary steps should be taken to see that the contractor and
subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field.
The findings of this report are valid as of this present date. However, changes in the conditions of a
property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of
man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may
occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be
invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside of our control. Therefore, this report is subject to
review and should be updated after a period of two years.
12
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The review of plans and specifications, field observations and testing under our direction are integral
parts of the recommendations made in this report. If East County Soil Consultation and Engineering,
Inc, is not retained for these services, the client agrees to assume our responsibility for any potential
claims that may arise during construction. Observation and testing are additional services, which are
provided by our firm, and should be budgeted within the cost of development.
Plates No. 1 through 3, Page L -1 and References are parts of this report.
Respectfully submitted,
61
No. Cc 2704
Exp:': - 'b% -on
Mamadou Saliou Diallo
RCE 54071, GE 2704
MSD /md
13
MATT & CELTNE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
PLATE NO.2
SUMMARY SHEET NO. 1
BOREHOLE NO. 1
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION
Surface TOPSOIL
dark brown, dry, loose, porous, silty fine sand with rootlets
1.5' SLOPEWASH (Qsw)
tan brown dry, loose, silty fine sand
2.0' {{ {< <{ {{
4.0 TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt)
tan, moist, medium dense to dense, silty fine sand
7.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater
borehole backfilled 4/30/08
BOREHOLE NO.2
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION
Surface TOPSOIL
dark brown, dry, loose, porous, silty fine sand with rootlets
1.0' SLOPEWASH (Qsw)
tan brown dry, loose, silty fine sand
3.0' 6 6 « if
4.0 TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt)
tan, moist, medium dense to dense, silty fine sand
6.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater
borehole backfilled 4/30/08
Y = Dry Density in PCF
14
GI
100.0
Y
98.8
M = Moisture Content in %
M
3.0
M
3.6
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
PLATE NO.2 (Continued)
SUMMARY SHEET
BOREHOLE NO.3
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION
Surface
TOPSOIL
dark brown, dry, loose, porous, silty fine sand with rootlets
1.0'
SLOPEWASH (Qsw)
tan brown dry, loose, silty fine sand
2.5)
{{ {{ tl {t
4.0
TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt)
tan, moist, medium dense to dense, silty fine sand
5.0'
bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater
borehole backfilled 5/8/08
BOREHOLE NO.4
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION
Surface TOPSOIL
dark brown, dry, loose, porous, silty fine sand with rootlets
1.5' SLOPEWASH (Qsw)
tan brown dry, loose, silty fine sand
4.0 TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt)
tan, moist, medium dense to dense, silty fine sand
4.5 {l {{ t{ l{ {t 6
5.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater
borehole backfilled 5/8/08
Y = Dry Density in PCF M = Moisture Content in %
15
Y
101.7
V1
111.6
4.0
OA
5.2
MAJOR DIVISIONS
SYMBOL
DESCRIPTION
GRAIN SIZE IN
GW
WELL GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL -SAND
IMILLINIETERS
BOULDERS
Above 12 Inches
_ MMURES. LITTLE OR NO FINES
COBBLES
GRAVELS
(MORE THAN h
'
OF COARSE
GP
POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL -SAND
MIXTURES. LITTLE OR NO FINES
GM
SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND -SILT MI.'CTURES
Coae
rs
FRACTION
>NO. 4 SIEVE
COARSE
GRAINED SOILS
SIZE)
'G Inch to No. 4
19.1 to 4.76
GC
CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND -CLAY MIXTURES
(MORE THAN 'A OF SOIL >
NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE)
Coarse
No. 4 to N0. 10
4.76 to 2.00
Medium
SW
WELL GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS,
Fine
N0. 40 to No. 200
0.420 to 0.074
LITTLE OR NO FINES
I Below No. 200
SANDS
SP
(MORE THAN %v
OF COARSE
POORLY GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS,
LITTLE OR NO FINES
S>'I
SILTY SANDS, SILT -SAND MIXTURES
FRACTION
<NO. 4 SIEVE
SIZE)
SC
CLAYEY SANDS, SAND -CLAY MUCTIIRES
SILTS &
NIL
INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK
FLOUR SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY
SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY
FINE GR.- +,IN-ED
CLAYS
LIQUID LIMIT
<30
CL
INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM
PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS,
SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS
OL
SOILS
(MORE THAN X OF SOIL <
NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE)
ORG ANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF
LOW PLASTICITY
SILTS &
NIH
NORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DATONACEOUS
FINE SANDY OR SILTY SOILS, ELASTIC SILTS
CH
CLAYS
LIQUID LIMIT
> 50
INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT
CLAYS
OH
ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY,
ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS, ORGANIC SILTS
HIGHLY ORGANTC SOILS
Pt
PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
C LADSIr ACA IION CA-IAR F (UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
CLASSIFICATION
RANGE OF GRAIN SIZES
US- STANDARD
GRAIN SIZE IN
SIEVE SIZE
IMILLINIETERS
BOULDERS
Above 12 Inches
Above 305
COBBLES
12 Inches To 3 Inches
305 To 76.2
GRAVEL
3lnches to No.4
76.2[04.76
Coae
rs
3 Inches to' /. Inch
761 to 19.1
Fine
'G Inch to No. 4
19.1 to 4.76
SAND
No. 4 m No. 200
4.76 to 0.074
Coarse
No. 4 to N0. 10
4.76 to 2.00
Medium
No. 10 to N0. 40
2.00 w 0.420
Fine
N0. 40 to No. 200
0.420 to 0.074
SILT AND CLAY
I Below No. 200
I. Below 0.074
1�
GRAIN SIZE CHART
tJ I I,VUN 1 Y SOIL CUNSUL IA ION
AND ENGINEERING, INC.
10935 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I^
SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
w
�w
s0
Y
v
is
0
.7 SO=
0 10 10 30 . M w :0 dE i0 tG0
WYW q,+f (LLI.
PLASTICITY CHART
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT
PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
PLATE NO. 3
MAY 15, 2008
L �
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
PAGE L-1
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D1557)
The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill materials as determined by ASTM
D1557, Procedures A and B which use 25 blows of a 10 -pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18
inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 4 -inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot compaction cylinder and Procedure C
which uses 56 blows of a 10 -pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal
layers in a 6 -inch diameter 1/13.3 cubic foot compaction cylinder are presented as follows:
OPTIMUM
MAXIMUM MOISTURE
SOIL TYPE/ DRY DENSITY CONTENT
PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION (PCF) ( %) LOCATION
1/A TAN BROWN SILTY FINE SAND 123.0 8.5 BH -1 @ 2.0'
EXPANSION INDEX TEST (ASTM D4829)
INITIAL SATURATED INITIAL DRY
MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY EXPANSION
CONTENT( %) CONTENT( %) (PCF) INDEX LOCATION
M
14.2
112.9
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS (ASTM D422)
BH -1 @ 2.0'
U.S. Standard
Sieve Size
Percent Passing
131-1-1 @ 2.0'
Slo ewash
Percent Passing
BH -2@ 4.0'
Terrace Deposits
Percent Passing
BH -1 @ 5.0'
Terrace De osits
I
1/2"
3/8"
#4
#8
#16
100
100
100
#30
93
93
94
#50
49
50
51
#100
19
18
48
#200
13
13
42
USCS
SM
SM
SM
16
..
MATT & CELINE POWER PROJECT NO. 08- 1147A2
REFERENCES
1. "2007 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2 ",
Published by International Code Council.
2. "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Detached Garage, 965 Ocean View Avenue, City of
Encinitas, California ", Project No. 07- 1147C4, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and
Engineering, Inc., Dated March 19, 2007.
3. "Geologic Reconnaissance, Bella Vista Remainder Parcels (APN 216 - 122-44 & 216 - 122 -14),
Encinitas, California" Prepared by Michael W. Hart, Engineering Geologist, File No. 714 -2006,
Dated October 7, 2006.
4. "Limited Site Investigation, Proposed Two -Story, Single - Family Residence, 733 Stratford Drive,
City of Encinitas, California ", Project No. 04- 1147C7, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation
and Engineering, Inc., Dated September 30, 2004.
5. "Soil Investigation, Proposed 5 -Lot Subdivision Site, 1555 Bella Vista Drive, Encinitas, California ",
Project No. 03- 1147D2, Prepared by Allied Earth Technology, Dated December 31, 2003.
6. "Limited Site Investigation, Proposed Single Family Residence, East Terminus of Guidero Way, APN
256- 152 -39, City of Encinitas, Califomia", Project No. 02- 1147C5, prepared by East County Soil
Consultation and Engineering, Inc., dated August 4, 2001
7. "1997 Uniform Building Code, Volume 2, Structural Engineering Design Provisions ", Published by
International Conference of Building Officials.
8. "Maps of Known Active Fault Near- Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada to
be used with 1997 Uniform Building Code ", Published by International Conference of Building
Officials.
9. "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California, Plate No. 2, Geologic
Maps of the Encinitas and Rancho Santa Fe 7.5' Quadrangles", by Siang S. Tan and Michael P.
Kennedy, 1996.
17
C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
505 S. VULCAN AVE.
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
X
GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 952GI
PARCEL NO. : 216 -0$„3 -6500 PLAN NO.:
JOB SITE ADDRESS: 1866 SHERIDAN RD CASE NO.: 08037 / CDP
APPLICANT NAME MATT POWER
MAILING ADDRESS: 1866 SHERIDAN RD PHONE NO.: 760 -579 -2190
CITY: LEUCADIA STATE: CA ZIP: 92024-
CONTRACTOR
LICENSE NO.
ENGINEER
PERMIT ISSU
PERMIT EXP.
INSPECTOR(
: MIKE SCOTT GRADING
: 353045
: BRIAN DONALD
E DATE: 11/03/08
09
13EN OLIVER
PHONE NO.: 760- 518 -7398
LICENSE TYPE: A
PHONE NO.: 760-942-1106
PERMIT ISSUED BY: 42&/ ji/�
- --
--------- - - - - --
PERMIT FEES
& DEPOSITS ----------------------------
1.
PERMIT FEE
.00
2.
GIS MAP FEE
.00
3.
INSPECTION FEE
5,227.00
4.
INSPECTION DEPOSIT:
.00
5.
NPDES INSPT FEE
1,045.00
6.
SECURITY DEPOSIT
57,918.00
7.
FLOOD CONTROL FE
231.00
8.
TRAFFIC FEE
.00
9.
IN -LIEU UNDERGRN
.00
10.IN
-LIEU IMPROVMT
.00
11.PLAN
CHECK FEE
.00
12.PLAN
CHECK DEPOSIT:
.00
-------
------------ - - - - --
DESCRIPTION
OF
WORK -------------------------
- - - - --
'ERMIT TO GUARANTEE BOTH PERFORMANCE AND LABOR /MATERIALS FOR EARTHWORK,
DRAINAGE, PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS AND EROSION CONTROL. CONTRACTOR MUST
MAINTAIN TRAFFIC CONTROL AT ALL TIMES PER W.A.T.C.H. STANDARDS OR
APPROVED PLAN. LETTER DATED AUGUST 19, 2008 APPLIES.
- - -- INSPECTION ---------- - - - - --
INITIAL INSPECTION
COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED
ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED
ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION
FINAL INSPECTION
DATE --------
INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - --
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE
INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE
LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF
ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO TH7$--]kPPLICATION.
'ri
CIRCLE ONE: ell? OWNER 2. AGENT 3. OTHER
DATE SI ED
-x717 S; % r ?,f I
TELEPHONE NUMBER
C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
505 S. VULCAN AVE.
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 952PE
PARCEL NO. : 216- 053 -6500
JOB SITE ADDRESS: 1866 SHERIDAN RE
APPLICANT NAME MATT POWER
MAILING ADDRESS: 1866 SHERIDAN RD
CITY: LEUCADIA STATE:
CONTRACTOR : MIKE SCOTT GRADING
LICENSE NO.: 353045
INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: NIC
POLICY NO. : 0410017280
ENGINEER : BRIAN DONALD
PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 11/03/08
PERMIT EXP. 09
INSPECTOR EN OLIVER
INSURANCE CO
PLAN NO.:
CASE NO.: 08037 / CDP
PHONE NO.: 760 -579 -2190
CA ZIP: 92024-
PHONE NO.: 760 -518 -7398
LICENSE TYPE: A
POLICY EXP. DATE: 6/14/09
PHOON O`: 760- 942 -1106
PERMIT ISSUED BY: / jWr_1
-------------------
- - - - --
PERMIT FEES
& DEPOSITS - - -- ----------------
1.
PERMIT FEE
290.00
2. GIS MAP FEE
.00
3.
INSPECTION FEE
.00
4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT:
.00
5.
NPDES INSPT FEE
.00
6. SECURITY DEPOSIT
.00
7.
FLOOD CONTROL FE
.00
8. TRAFFIC FEE
.00
9.
IN -LIEU UNDERGRN
.00
10.IN -LIEU IMPROVMNT
.00
ll.PLAN
CHECK FEE
.00
12.PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT:
.00
-------------------
- - - - --
DESCRIPTION
OF WORK --------- - - - - --
--- - - - - - --
PERMIT FOR ENCROACHMENT OF TURFBLOCK PER PLAN 952 -G. CONTRACTOR MUST
MAINTAIN TRAFFIC CONTROL AT ALL TIMES PER W.A.T.C.H. STANDARDS OR
APPROVED PLAN.
- - -- INSPECTION ---------- - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - --
INITIAL INSPECTION
FINAL INSPECTION
I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE C
PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE
GNATURE
0- T �
PRINT NAME
CIRCLE ONE: 112OWNER 2. AGENT
PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER
ION IS TRUE.
3. OTHER
DAT�GG1 ED
')'Ory 87`3 0r90
TELEPHONE NUMBER
Resource
Development
Corporation
CIVIL ENGINEERING • 5URVEYING • PLANNING
City of Encinitas
Engineering Services Permits
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas. CA 92024
DEC 1 4 2009
Date: December 7, 2009
Re: Engineer's Final Grading Certification for Project No. 08 -037 CDP and
Grading Permit No. 952 -G
The grading under Permit No. 952 -G has been performed in substantial conformance with the
approved grading plan or as shown on the attached "As- Graded" plan.
Final grading inspection has demonstrated that lot drainage conforms with the approved grading
plan and that swales drain at a minimum of 1% to the street and/or an appropriate drainage
system.
All the Low Impact Development, Source Control and Treatment Control Best Management
Practices as shown on the drawing and required by the Best Management Practice Manual Part II
were constructed and are operational, together with the required maintenance covenant(s).
By: Engineer of Record Date:
Brian Donald, ROE M75
License Expires 3/31/2010
BRIAN
DONALD
No. 26175
CIVIL
Professional
Verification by the Engineering Inspector of this fact is done by the Inspector's signature hereon
and will take place only after the above is signed and stamped and will not relieve the Engineer of
Record of the ultimate responsibility:
By: Engineering Inspector
Date:
2410 5TROM5ERG CIRCLE • CARL55AD, CA 92010 • TEL (760)942 -1106 • FAX (760) 730 -3059