The URL can be used to link to this page

2009-10041 GLine: '7 I IOU 066 i oot+� _ � o$ -094 cDP CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. zz 1441 MON IIEL ROAD, SUITE 115 1 ESCONDIDO, CA 92026 1 780.1/8.1955 1 FAX ?60 146 9806 March 31, 2009 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G Jeff and Bard Redlitz 4431 Heritage Glen Lane San Diego, California 92130 Telephone 858- 694 -8834 Via Email: Subject: Summary of Building Pad Conditions Proposed Redlitz Residence 825 Arden Drive Encinitas, California i Reference: Attached Mr. and Mrs. Redlitz: As requested, Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. (CTE) has performed observation of the recent earthwork to prepare the building pads for the garage and main residence at the above referenced site. This letter is provided as verification that building pads have been prepared in general conformance with the recommendations in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report referenced above. As a result, the subject site is considered suitable for support of the proposed improvements, as indicated herein. The exposed subgrade beneath the garage area is entirely competent formational material and all footings will bear on native material. The main house building pad spans a cut -fill transition; however, the proposed plans call for a raised a wood floor on perimeter spread footings. Therefore, all perimeter footings are to bear on competent formational material at depths below finished grade as indicated in our geotechnical report. This will result in locally deepened footings to reach competent formational materials. As per our report, CTE should observe all footing excavations prior to steel or concrete placement. The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & Dan . Math, GE# 2665 Principal Engineer SCONDI00 ppaOFE`S /p �4 ?F' \SL T, ,tf c� Q 9� i No. 2665 * Exp. 12/31/10 \T CrfCMN \Gp�`ei �CF ret \FC , , INC. Martin h+ Siem, CEG #2311 Certified Engineering Geologist TRACY I SACRAMENTO I_ �yy \OPIAL E. C,f�0 N O� �Z1 5+ 0\ a No. 2311 CERTIFIED y+ ENGINEERING 1k GEOLOGIST Q Exp.6 /30/10 \TF�F CAS \FO / GEOTECNNICAL I ENVIRONMENTAL I CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND TESTING I CIVIL ENGINEERING I SURVEYING Summary of Building Pad Conditions Proposed Redlitz Residence 825 Arden Drive, Encinitas, California Page 2 March 31 2009 CTE Job No.: 10 -9618G References: Addendum 02 to Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Review of Foundation Plans Proposed Redlitz Residence 825 Arden Drive Encinitas, California, dated March 16, 2009 Addendum 01 to Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Review of Grading Plans Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of the 800 Block of Arden Drive Encinitas, California, dated December 17, 2007 Untitled Plans, dated 12- 01 -08; revised 3 -10 -09 for: Redlitz Residence, "825 Arden Drive Residence, Encinitas Ca ". Architectural plan sheets Al through A5, and structural plan sheets S1 and S2. Sampo Engineering, 2008, "Grading Plans for: Redlitz Residence, APN: 258- 233 -09, Vacant Lot on Arden Drive," Drawing No. 10041 -G, Sheets 1 through 3 of 3 Construction Testing & Engineering, "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Redlitz Residence, Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive, Encinitas, California," Job No. 10- 9618G, July 17, 2008 \\ Esc —s r\pmjecb \lo-9619G\LAr— Building Pad Cert.dm .t E 1 Land Planning, Civil Engineering, Surveying, City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 June 23, 2010 Page 1 of 1 Re: Engineer's Final Grading Verification for Grading Permit Number 10041 -G, Redlitz Residence, Arden Drive Encinitas, Ca. The grading under permit no. 10041 -G has been performed in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan, or as shown on the attached 'As Graded' plan. Final Grading Inspection has demonstrated that lot drainage conforms to the approved grading plan and that swales, if any, drain at a minimum of 1% to the street and /or an appropriate drainage system. The Low Impact Development, Source Control and /or Treatment Control Best Management Practices as shown on the approved drawing and required by the Best Management Practice Manual Part 11 were constructed and are operational, together with the required maintenance covenant(s). / Engineer of Record: Dated: Vincent L. Sampo, PE, PIS for Sampo Engineering, Inc. �0�2� //p Verification by the Engineering Inspector of this fact is done by the Inspector's signature hereon and will take place only after the above is signed and stamped and will not relieve the Engineer of Record of the ultimate responsibility: Engine erin In Spector. Dated: 7 1 1034 Second Street ♦ Encinitas, CA 92024 ♦ phone: 760436 -0660 ♦ fax: 760 436 -0659 info@sampoengineering.com so March 31, 2009 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 1111 MONTIEL ROAD, SUITE 115 1 ESCONDIDO, CA 01011 1 710341.4555 1 FAX 160.1 41.9106 Jeff and Bard Redlitz 4431 Heritage Glen Lane San Diego, California 92130 Telephone 858- 694 -8834 Via Subject: Summary of Building Pad Conditions Proposed Redlitz Residence 825 Arden Drive Encinitas, California Reference: Attached Mr. and Mrs. Redlitz: CTE Job No. 10 -9618G As requested, Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. (CTE) has performed observation of the recent earthwork to prepare the building pads for the garage and main residence at the above referenced site. This letter is provided as verification that building pads have been prepared in general conformance with the recommendations in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report referenced above. As a result, the subject site is considered suitable for support of the proposed improvements, as indicated herein. The exposed subgrade beneath the garage area is entirely competent formational material and all footings will bear on native material. The main house building pad spans a cut -fill transition; however, the proposed plans call for a raised a wood floor on perimeter spread footings. Therefore, all perimeter footings are to bear on competent formational material at depths below finished grade as indicated in our geotechnical report. This will result in locally deepened footings to reach competent formational materials. As per our report, CTE should observe all footing excavations prior to steel or concrete placement. The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & a �GEO 2665 Principal Engineer CONDIDO 1� Ap0.0PESS /ON\ a�e` w QP 9i c z � NO. 2665 m * Exp. 12/31/10 c \TFOrECHN�O� ?� j F re' \P INC. / Martin E. Siem, CEG #2311 Certified Engineering Geologist I TRACY I �\GpLAL GEO �t�`O SxN E. Sit. OGiP a `T CERTIf ISO ?i } ENGINEER'S G GEOLOGIST .n. fyp.6 /30 /T0 qTF I INDS I PHOENIX GEOTECHNICAL I ENVIRONMENTAL I CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND TESTING 1 CIVIL ENGINEERING I SURVEYING Summary of Building Pad Conditions Proposed Redlitz Residence 825 Arden Drive, Encinitas, California Page 2 March 31 2009 CTE Job No.: 10 -9618G References: Addendum 02 to Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Review of Foundation Plans Proposed Redlitz Residence 825 Arden Drive Encinitas, California, dated March 16, 2009 Addendum 01 to Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Review of Grading Plans Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of the 800 Block of Arden Drive Encinitas, California, dated December 17, 2007 Untitled Plans, dated 12- 01 -08; revised 3 -10 -09 for: Redlitz Residence, "825 Arden Drive Residence, Encinitas Ca ". Architectural plan sheets AIthrough A5, and structural plan sheets S1 and S2. Sampo Engineering, 2008, "Grading Plans for: Redlitz Residence, APN: 258- 233 -09, Vacant Lot on Arden Drive," Drawing No. 10041 -G, Sheets 1 through 3 of 3 Construction Testing & Engineering, "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Redlitz Residence, Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive, Encinitas, California," Job No. 10- 9618G, July 17, 2008 \\Esc_s OT\Pmjwts \IO.9618G\Ltr Building Pad Cen.doc ti 1 Samgo Ensineerin2, Inc. t Land Planning, Civil Engineering, Surveying, Mapping s March 30, 2009 I I D City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 V ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAs RE: Engineer's Pad Verification for Grading Permit No. 10041 -G, Arden Drive, Encinitas, APN: 258- 233 -09 Pursuant to section 23.24.310 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Verification Letter for the subject grading plan. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project, l hereby state all rough grading for the pad of the new residential building and garage has been completed in substantial conformance with the approved plans, and the requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Garage Pad Sincerely, Vincent Sampo,PE,PLS President Plan Approved Pad Elevation 157.3 Field Measured Pad Elevation 157.2 1034 Second Street ♦ Encinitas, CA 92024 ♦ phone: 760- 436 -0660 • fax: 760 -436 -0659 info@sampoengincering.com ENGINEERING SEA VICES DEPARTMENT Ci �� Capitol Improvement Projects Dishict Support Services Elwii as Field Operations D Subdivision Engineering V / Traffic Engineering V ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. Zeal-1-10 Name of Project 10,111.11 /—;!-� Name of Developer Site Location�� ... ..(address::: ... number .. ..- '...suffix! -:OOtl .(bldg)- 9VI-1 0- �®�' J have inspected the gradi ;at thesubjectsite and havewerified certificatton.of the pad by the iEngineer of Work, dated -/�. and certification of soil.` compaction by the Soll Engine dated 2L—LC3k J:am hereby satisfied that the rough grading has been completed_ it fi= accordance:wittrthe:approvetl r,• • .: plans..-and specifications, Chapter 23:24 -of -the Munitapal Code andr:any'other applicable— engineering standards and specific project requirements. ;•w:. .Based on ,my observation and the certifications,.! take no exception to the :Issuance -.of,.a building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , If any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation; or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and Irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. / -I6 -.Io (Date! (Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if appropiate) (Date) Reference: Building Permit No. — Special Not. Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in-boxes- Please member to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. JSG /field3.docl TEL 760. 633.2600 / FAX 760-63 3-1627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinim, California 920243633 TOO 760 -633 -2700 11� recycled paper 12/14/2009 09:22 8584955599 FACILITIES MNGMJT PAGE 02/02 ONSTRUCTION 1441 NINTIEL 8111. 71171 111 1 Domniber1I,2009 LING & ENGINEI nett 1 ?14.741.40611 IAI IIIJ41.1101 jell and Barb Redlitz 4431 Heritage Glen Lana San Diego, Califomia 92130 Telephone: 159494-8934 Subject: Refining Well Foundation Approval-Latter 02 Proposed Redlim Residence 825 Arden Drive Encinitas, Califomia ING. INC. CTE job No, 10 -9618G 03MMir =1 0 -M lllMw Raferenees: Construction Testing At Engineering, Letter "Retaining Wall Foundation Approval," dated March 16, 2009. proposed Redlitz Residence, 825 Ardan Drive; Encinitas, California CTB Job No. 10-961 NG. San Diego Regional Standard Drawings for. Melorry Refining Wall Type 1(Level Baekfft Droving C -I, detcd 3/01/2003; and Masonry Retaining Wall Type 3 (Level Bac-01% Drawing C -3, dated 3/01!2003. Conshuction Testing & Engineering, °prelbninary Geoteahnicsl Investigation, proposed Redlit: Reaidenw, Vacant Lot an &61st Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive, Encinitas, California." Job No. 10-%I SG, July 17, 2008 Mr. and Mrs. Redlim As requested, Construction Tinting & Engineering, Ina (GTE) has completed our inspection ofthe perimeter retaining wall footings eking the tgrths , , eouthem, and western portion of the site. We conducted a site visit on December I I, 2o09 to perform footing inspectiom for confvtmanoa to the County of San Diego Regional Standard DrawiW, AS reRrenced above, and conformance wilt our prelimiosry Geoeechnical invatigadon report, dated July 17. 2008, Our inspection found that the fbotings were in compliance with the d andard Drawings soin w r support nde the compdwd fotmw;uMl material that probed dome to very denaq planned improvements. We sppreciese the opportunity to be of service on this project Should you have any questions or teed further infomntion please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CONSTR OiN TES-11110 & ENGINEERING, M. w ce !� / g��N E s�� Martin StHn, CF.C7112311 /b 271 0 % N� IMM IN Senior Oookgw ' eMal00rar 0/30/10 Distribution: (2) Addrett4te •cow 0E071CHNICAI I ENVIRINMENIAt I CINS7RUCIIem INs /t1:TI0N AN0 TE STING I CIVIL ENGINEERING I SURVEYING 01/11/2010 09:25 January 1 ] , 2009 7607464931 [or, CTE ESCONDIDO PAGE 02/03 UCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 1111 MDNTIEL ROAD, SUITE III I ESCONDIDO. CA 14121 1 711.718.1955 1 FAX 111 746 list Jeff and Barb Redlitz CTE Job No. 10 -9618G 4431 Heritage Glen Lane San Diego, California 92130 Telephone: 858 - 694-8834 Via Email: ieff redlitzna sdcounty.ca.uov Subject: Retaining Wall Foundation Approval -Letter 03 Proposed Redlitz Residence 825 Arden Drive Encinitas, California References: Attached Mr. and Mrs. Redlitz: As requested, Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. (CTE) has completed our inspection of the second tier retaining wall footing in the front (west) side of the property adjacent to the stairway access from Arden Drive. We conducted a site visit on January 8, 2009 to perform footing inspections for conformance to the County of San Diego Regional Standard Drawings, as referenced above, and conformance with our Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation report, dated July 17, 2008. Our inspection found that the footings were in compliance with the Standard Drawings and were founded in competent material that probed dense to very dense, and is considered suitable to support the planned improvements. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. Should you have any questions or need further information please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully Submitted, CONSTRUCTION TTNG & ENGINEERING, INC. NN Martin E. Siem, CEG #2311 a nlo. 23113 Senior Geologist cEPTEFIEo per• * ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST � Nr Exp. 6130 /10 �2 Distribution: (2) Addressee 9p o FOF CA��F/ SAN DIEGO I ESCONDIDO I RIVERSIDE I VENTURA I MERCED I TRACY I SACRAMENTO I PALM SPRINGS I PHOENIX GEOTECHNICAI I ENVIRONMENTAL I CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND TESTING I CIVIL ENGINEERING I SURVEYING ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Capital Improvement Projects City 0f District Support Services Enchl&zs Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. /W!1(z( Name of Project Name of Developer Site Location �Vn�i w Lam' (address ...number ...str�ame ...suffix] Oat) Ybldg) The proposed grading of the subject site -will .require construction of retaining walls that are also building wails. The inspection.of the site retaining walls is to be done by the field operations Division of the Engineering Services Department. However, the inspection of the building retaining walls is to be done by the Building Inspection Division of the Community Development Department. Therefore, issuance of the necessary Building Permit is requested in order to facilitate the completion of rough grading. NO INSPECTIONS BEYOND FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATION ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY BUILDING INSPECTION UNTIL A NOTICE OF ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL, WITHOUT CONDITIONS AND SIGNED BY THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR, IS RECEIVED. FRAMING IS PROHBITED. !Signature of Engineering rnspectorl (Dace) !Signature of Senior Civif Engineer, only if appropiatel Reierence: Building Permit No. _ -- (Date) Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a full rough grading approval and submit that paperwork when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Buflding Inspection. Thank you. JSG1field2.doc1 TFt 760 -633 -2600 1 FAX 760- 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, Califomia 92024 -3633 Too 760 -633 -2700 1� recycled paper 9 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 1441 MONTIEL ROAD, SUITE 115 1 ESCONDIDO. CA 92026 1 160.746.1955 1 FAX 760.746.9006 March 18, 2009 Jeff and Barb Redlitz 4431 Heritage Glen Lane San Diego, California 92130 Telephone: 858- 694 -8834 Subject: Retaining Wall Foundation Approval Proposed Redlitz Residence 825 Arden Drive Encinitas, California CTE Job No. 10 -9618G Via Email: jeff.redlitz n sdcountv.ca.gov References: San Diego Regional Standard Drawings for: Masonry Retaining Wall Type I (Level Backfill), Drawing C -1, dated 3/01/2003; and Masonry Retaining Wall Type 3 (Level Backfill), Drawing C -3, dated 3/01/2003. Construction Testing & Engineering, "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Redlitz Residence, Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive, Encinitas, California," Job No. 10- 9618G, July 17, 2008 Mr. and Mrs. Redlitz: As requested, Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. (CTE) has completed our inspection of the perimeter retaining wall footings along the eastern portion of the site. To date, the footings were excavated and inspected east of the main house structure. The footings will be extended along the southern portion of the site at a later date, and will require additional approval when completed. We conducted site visits on 3/17/09 and 3/18/09 to perform footing inspections for conformance to the County of San Diego Regional Standard Drawings, as referenced above, and conformance with our Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation report, dated July 17, 2008. Our inspection found that the footings were in compliance with the Standard Drawings and were founded in competent formational material that probed dense to very dense, and are considered suitable to support the planned improvements. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. Should you have any questions or need further information please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CONSSTTRU`CTIO STING & ENGINEERING, INC. I S`SXONAL Gc Martin E. Siem, CEG#2311 1z No Cta,,:, Senior Geologist * ENGINCE4 he ,n GEOLOGB- Distribution: (2) Addressee 9 ENO' 6130110 IT SAN DIEGO I ESCONDIDO I RIVERSIDE I VENTU TRACY I SACRAMENTO I PALM SPRINGS I PHOENIX GEOTECHNICAL I ENVIRONMENTAL I CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND TESTING I CIVIL ENGINEERING I SURVEYING I I CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING. INC. SWB .G mama Nhirma 9B51UMG WW ..G 51WI.93mG N.INM598NQ4.G ABItID.G 1019 ft 194 htl=R 11m9E1111ln1b, NMSfY[ha 94W. ft 8>OlrCSn M. MBM YYan Brc. 30Y BU>weA P. 9 115 S Bwc AiA 9JY M/ 9NYE 91ieII 9�7i NNUiG 953N EsvYOO.G 07@9 NWmY PN,G 91991 Pin1NO1.G 91319 PM.G 9 um 98301 N. Mj9Ynb.G 95®0 N.9Yn5p 'u ® an)ffie�l f1W)lIfi-R55 (EI9)G9�999 861)571JM1 (9DS)1M-0BR Qm) 999 -9880 (916)al{iW p9%OP18R ryBJ 95e�f9 EN( (1B1)tMi98E8 w (919)G m (951) U14IN EN( (9051 WV18 W (M9)tl M95 GB (915)MI 7 W (m) =M f89 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED REDLITZ RESIDENCE VACANT LOT ON EAST SIDE OF 800 BLOCK OF ARDEN DRIVE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: JEFF AND BARB REDLITZ 4431 HERITAGE GLEN LANE SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92130 FEB Z Prepared by: CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 1441 MONTIEL ROAD, SUITE 115 ESCONDIDO, CA 92026 CTE JOB NO.: 10 -9618G JULY 17, 2008 GEOTECHNICAL I ENVIRONMENTAL I CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND TESTING I CIVIL ENGINEERING I SURVEYING TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES .................................... ............................... 1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................... ............................... 1 1.2 Scope of Services ........................................................................... ............................... 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................ ............................... 2 3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ................. ............................... 2 3.1 Field Investigation .......................................................................... ............................... 2 3.2 Laboratory Testing ......................................................................... ............................... 3 4.0 GEOLOGY ................................................................................................ ............................... 3 4.1 General Setting ............................................................................... ............................... 3 4.2 Geologic Conditions ...................................................................... ............................... 4 4.2.1 Topsoil ............................................................................. ..............................4 4.2.2 Quaternary Terrace Deposits ( Qop2- 4) ........................... ............................... 5 4.3 Groundwater Conditions ................................................................ ............................... 5 4.4 Geologic Hazards ........................................................................... ............................... 5 4.4.1 Surface Fault Rupture ..................................................... ............................... 5 4.4.2 Local and Regional Faul ting ............................................ ..............................6 4.4.3 Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement Evaluation ........... ............................... 7 4.4.4 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation .................................... ............................... 8 4.4.5 Landsliding ...................................................................... ............................... 8 4.4.6 Compressible and Expansive Soils ................................. ............................... 8 4.4.7 Corrosive Soils ................................................................ ............................... 9 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................. ............................... 10 5.1 General ................... :.................................................................................................... 10 5.2 Site Preparation ............................................................................ ............................... 10 5.3 Site Excavation .............................................................................. .............................11 5.4 Fill Placement and Compaction ................................................... ............................... 11 5.5 Fill Material s ................................................................................ ............................... 11 5.6 Temporary Construction Slopes ................................................... ............................... 12 5.7 Foundations and Slab Recommendations .................................... ............................... 13 5.7.1 Foundations ................................................................... ............................... 13 5.7.2 Foundation Settl ement .................................................. ............................... 14 5.7.3 Foundation Setback ....................................................... ............................... 14 5.7.4 Interior Concrete Slabs .................................................. ............................... 14 5.8 Seismic Design Criteria ................................................................. .............................15 5.9 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures ........................................ ............................... 15 5.10 Exterior Fl atwork ....................................................................... ............................... 16 5.11 Drainage ..................................................................................... ............................... 17 5.12 Slopes ......................................................................................... ............................... 17 5.13 Construction Observation .......................................................... ............................... 18 5.14 Plan Review ............................................................................... ............................... 18 6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION .................................................. ............................... 19 FIGURES FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 APPENDICES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D SITE INDEX MAP GEOLOGIC/ EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP REGIONAL FAULT MAP REFERENCES CITED EXPLORATION LOGS LABORATORY METHODS AND RESULTS STANDARD GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 1 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.1 Introduction This report presents the results of Construction Testing and Engineering, Inc.'s ( "CTE ") preliminary geotechnical investigation and provides conclusions and engineering criteria for the proposed development. We have performed this work in accordance with the terms of our proposal no. G- 1789, dated, May 31, 2008, and executed on June 9, 2008. It is our understanding, based on the preliminary site/ roof plan provided, that the property is to be developed by constructing two one to two -story wood -framed structures with associated improvements (driveways, utilities, and landscaping). Specific recommendations for excavations, fill placement, and foundation design for proposed structures are presented in this report. 1.2 Scope of Services The scope of services provided included: • Review of readily available geologic and soils reports pertinent to the site and adjacent areas. • Exploration of subsurface conditions to the depths of anticipated construction. • Laboratory testing of representative soil samples to provide data to evaluate the geotechnical design characteristics of the soils. • Definition of the general geology and evaluation of potential geologic hazards at the site. • Soil engineering design criteria for the proposed improvements. • Preparation of this summary report for the subsurface investigation performed, including geotechnical construction recommendations. References cited in this report are presented in Appendix A. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 2 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located on the east side of the 800 block of Arden Drive (Figure 1). Presently, the site is undeveloped, supporting a moderate growth of bushes, trees, and grass. There is a slight west to southwest surface gradient across the site. Site elevations range from approximately 141 feet above mean sea level (msl) in the southwest comer of the site to approximately 157 feet msl in the northeast corner. The site is bounded by Arden Drive to the west with residential development abutting the remaining boundaries of the site. 3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 3.1 Field Investigation Our field exploration was conducted on June 20, 2008. It included a visual site reconnaissance and the excavation of four exploratory test pits to evaluate the condition of the underlying soil materials. The test pits were excavated with a Catepillar 430E backhoe to a maximum depth of approximately 12 feet below the ground surface (bgs). Representative bulk soil samples were obtained and stored in burlap sample bags for transport to the geotechnical laboratory. Soils were logged in the field by a CTE geologist and visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The field descriptions have been modified, where appropriate, to reflect laboratory test results. Test pit logs including descriptions of the soils encountered are included in Appendix B. Approximate test pit locations are presented on Figure 2. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Redlitz Residence Page 3 Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive Julv 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G 3.2 Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on representative soil samples for classification purposes and to evaluate physical properties and engineering characteristics of the material. Soil samples were tested for particle -size distribution, modified Proctor density, and various chemical characteristics. Test method descriptions and laboratory test results are included in Appendix C. 4.0 GEOLOGY 4.1 General Setting Encinitas is located within the Peninsular Ranges physiographic province, which is characterized by its northwest- trending mountain ranges, intervening valleys, and predominantly northwest - trending regional faults. The region can be further subdivided into the coastal plain area, a central mountain— valley area and the eastern mountain - valley area. The project site is located within the coastal plain area. The coastal plain is characterized by geomorphic landforms known as marine terraces, which are erosion surfaces or abrasion platforms cut by ocean-wave processes along past coastlines. These surfaces are recognized today as the relatively flat -lying mesas and terraces that range in elevation across the coastal plain of San Diego. The elevation differences of these marine terraces are the result of sea level changes that are associated activity in the Rose Canyon Fault Zone over the past two million years. The mesas or terraces have been incised by westward - flowing drainages that have adjusted to the relative sea level changes. The combined effect of these processes is that older marine terraces are found at progressively higher elevations. Several distinct marine terraces present in the San Diego area include the Linda Vista Mesa (cut approximately 1.3 million years ago), the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Redlitz Residence Page 4 Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive Julv 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G Nestor Terrace (cut approximately 120,000 years ago), and the Bird Rock Terrace (cut approximately 80,000 years ago). The marine terraces are typically covered with marine sediments covered with non -marine terrestrial deposits. 4.2 Geologic Conditions Based on regional geologic mapping by Tan and Kennedy (1996) and our exploratory holes, soils at the site consist of a thin layer of topsoil over the Quaternary Terrace Deposits. Based on the mapping by Tan and Kennedy, units of the Tertiary Del Mar Formation are interpreted to underlie the Terrace Deposits at depths of approximately 80 to 100 feet. Descriptions of the geologic units are presented below. 4.2.1 Topsoil Topsoil was observed in all of the excavations to a maximum depth of approximately one foot bgs. These deposits were observed to be present at the surface throughout the site. This soil consisted of loose, dry to damp, silty fine grained sand with roots present throughout. Although we encountered only one foot of these materials in our test pits, the thickness may vary. The topsoil is not considered suitable to support proposed structures or engineered fill in its present condition. We recommend excavation of these soils. However, they may be re- used as fill on site if they are screened of organic material and oversize particles (greater than three inches in maximum dimension). Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Redlitz Residence Page 5 Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G 4.2.2 Ouatemary Terrace Deposits (Ooo2 -4) Quaternary Terrace Deposits were observed beneath the topsoil in all of the test pits to the maximum explored depth of 12 feet. The Terrace Deposits primarily consisted of red-brown, massive, moist, dense to very dense, oxidized, silty fine to medium grained sand with traces of clay and a few minor roots present throughout. These soils are considered suitable for support of structures or fill provided recommendations presented in this report are followed. 4.3 Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was not encountered in any of our test pits to the maximum explored depth of 12 feet bgs. While groundwater conditions may vary, especially during periods of sustained precipitation and excessive irrigation, it is not anticipated to affect the proposed improvements, if proper site drainage is maintained. 4.4 Geologic Hazards From our investigation, it appears that the geologic hazards at the site are primarily limited to those caused by shaking from earthquake - generated ground motions. 4.4.1 Surface Fault Rupture Based on our site reconnaissance and review of the referenced literature, no known active fault traces underlie or project toward the site. According to the California Division of Mines and Geology, a fault is active if it displays evidence of activity in the last 11,000 years (Hart and Bryant, 1997). The potential for surface rupture from displacement or fault movement beneath the proposed structures is considered low. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 6 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G 4.4.2 Local and Regional Faulting The California Geological Survey broadly groups faults as "Class A" or "Class B" (CDMG, 1996). Class A faults are identified based upon relatively well - defined paleoseismic activity, and a fault -slip rate of more than 5 millimeters per year (mm /yr). In contrast, Class B faults have comparatively less defined paleoseismic activity and are considered to have a fault -slip rate less than 5 mm /yr. The nearest known Class B fault is the Rose Canyon Fault which is approximately 5.3 kilometers west of the site (Blake, T.F., 2000). The nearest known Class A faults are the Temecula and Julian segments of the Elsinore Fault which are both located approximately 45.3 kilometers northeast and east of the site. The following Table 1 presents the six faults nearest to the site, including their magnitude and fault classification. The attached Figure 3 shows regional faults and seismicity with respect to the site. TABLE 1 NEAR SrrE FAULT PARAIVJErM FAULT NAME DISTANCE FROM TAN E FROM SITE MAXIMUM EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE CLASSIFICATION Rose Canyon 5.3 7.2 B Newport- Inglewood (Offshore) 18.5 7.1 B Coronado Bank 28.5 7.6 B Elsinore - Temecula 45.3 6.8 A Elsinore - Julian 45.3 7.1 A Palos Verdes 66.4 7.3 B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 7 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G The California Geological Survey, Probabilistic Seismic Hazards Mapping Ground Motion Page (on line pshamap.asp) indicates ground motions with 10% probability ofexceedance in SO years for the site as underlain by soils corresponding to site category D are as follows: TABLE2 SITE GROUND MOTION 87TH 10% PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE IN 50 YEARS PARAMETER UNIT GRAVITY Peak Ground Acceleration 0.328 Spectral Acceleration at Short (0.2 second) Period 0.788 Spectral Acceleration at Long (1.0 second) Period 0.394 The site could be subjected to significant shaking in the event of a major earthquake on any of the faults listed above or other faults in the southern California or northern Baja California area. 4.4.3 Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement Evaluation Liquefaction occurs when saturated fine - grained sands or silts lose their physical strengths during earthquake induced shaking and behave as a liquid. This is due to loss of point -to -point grain contact and transfer of normal stress to the pore water. Liquefaction potential varies with water level, soil type, material gradation, relative density, and probable intensity and duration of ground shaking. Seismic settlement can occur with or without liquefaction; it results from densification of loose soils. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Redlitz Residence Page 8 Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G The site is generally underlain by dense fine- grained terrace deposits with a relatively deep groundwater table. Therefore, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction or seismic settlement at the site is negligible. 4.4.4 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation According to McCulloch (1985), the tsunami potential in the San Diego County coastal area for "100- year" and "500- year" tsunami waves are approximately five and eight feet or less. This suggests that there is a very low probability of site damage, owing to the elevation of the site, and its distance from the ocean. In addition, oscillatory waves (seiches) are considered unlikely due to the absence of large adjacent bodies of water. 4.4.5 Landslidine According to the regional mapping completed for the Relative Landslide Susceptibility and Landslide Distribution Map for the Encinitas Quadrangle (Tan and Giffen, 1995), the site is located within an area "generally susceptible" to landslides. Landslides were not encountered during our field exploration, and have not been mapped at or near the site, to our knowledge. Therefore, landsliding is not considered a significant geologic hazard within or adjacent to the site. 4.4.6 Compressible and Expansive Soils The shallow topsoil present throughout the site is considered to be compressible in its current condition, and should be removed and properly recompacted during site grading to mitigate compressibility potential. Based on our observations and our experience with similar soils, it Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 9 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G is our opinion that the Terrace Deposits underlying the subject site are not subject to significant compressibility. Based on geologic observation, and laboratory testing of similar soils at a nearby site (CTE, 2004), the near - surface materials at the site have very low expansion characteristics. Therefore, the presence of expansive materials is not anticipated to impact the proposed development. 4.4.7 Corrosive Soils Soil samples have been tested for several chemical characteristics. Based on the sulfate test results, and the AC1318 Building Code and Commentary, the on -site soils present a negligible sulfate exposure to Portland cement concrete. The Corrosion Guidelines by the California Department of Transportation Division of Engineering Services, Corrosion Technology Branch, Version 1.0, dated September 2003 indicate: For structural elements, the Department considers a site to be corrosive if one or more of the following conditions exist for the representative soil and water samples taken at the site: Chloride concentration is 500 ppm or greater, sulfate concentration is 2000 ppm or greater, or the pH is 5.5 or less. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 10 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G Thus, in accordance with current Caltrans procedures, the subject site would be considered "Non Corrosive." However, CTE does not practice corrosion engineering; therefore, if you are concerned about corrosion of metallic improvements, then a qualified corrosion specialist should be consulted. A summary of the laboratory chemical testing is presented in Appendix C. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 General We conclude that the proposed development of the site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the recommendations in this report are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. 5.2 Site Preparation Before any grading occurs, the site should be cleared of existing debris, brush, and other deleterious materials. In areas to receive settlement- sensitive improvements, all topsoil, surfrcially eroded, desiccated, burrowed, or otherwise loose or disturbed soils should be excavated to the depth of the suitable native material. This excavation should occur at least in the area within 10 feet outside the proposed improvements. CTE recommends the removal of the generally loose and unsuitable high- organic- containing soils at the surface of the site. Organic and other deleterious materials not suitable for structural backfill should be disposed of off site at a legal disposal site. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 11 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 _ CTE Job No. 10 -9618G Oversize materials greater than three inches in maximum dimension, are not suitable for structural backfill within three feet of proposed grade, and should be disposed of off site. 5.3 Site Excavation Based on our observations, shallow excavations in site materials should be feasible using well- maintained heavy -duty construction equipment run by experienced operators. 5.4 Fill Placement and Compaction The geotechnical consultant should verify that the proper site preparation has occurred before fill placement occurs. Following removal of any loose, disturbed soils, areas to receive fills or improvements should be scarified approximately 12 inches, moisture conditioned, and properly compacted. Fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent (as evaluated by ASTM D 1557) at moisture contents greater than two percent above optimum. The optimum lift thickness for backfill soil will depend on the type of compaction equipment used. Generally, backfill should be placed in uniform, horizontal lifts not exceeding eight inches in loose thickness. Backfill placement and compaction should be conducted in conformance with geotechnical recommendations and local ordinances. 5.5 Fill Materials The low to non - expansive soils derived from the on -site materials are considered suitable for reuse on the site as compacted fill. If used, these materials should be screened of organic materials and materials greater than three inches in a maximum dimension. Irreducible materials Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 12 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G greater than three inches in maximum dimension were not identified in the preliminary investigation; however, if such materials are encountered, they should not be used in shallow fills (within three feet of proposed grades) on the site. In utility trenches, adequate bedding should surround pipes. Imported fill beneath structures, pavements and walks should have an expansion index less than or equal to 50 (ASTM D 4829). Imported fill soils for use in structural or slope areas should be evaluated by the soils engineer to determine strength characteristics before placement on the site. 5.6 Temporary Construction Slopes The following recommended slopes should be relatively stable against deep - seated failure, but may experience localized sloughing. On -site soils are considered Type B and Type C soils with recommended slope ratios as set forth in Table 3 below. s T 3 N RECOMM>ESt) IAItY SLOPE RAMS SOIL TYPE SLOPE RATIO MAXIMUM HEIGHT (Horizontal: vertical) B (Terrace Deposits) 1:1 (OR FLATTER) 10 Feet C (Topsoil) 1.5:1 (OR FLATTER) 5 Feet Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 13 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive Julv 17. 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G Actual field conditions and soil type designations must be verified by a "competent person" while excavations exist, according to Cal -OSHA regulations. In addition, the above sloping recommendations do not allow for surcharge loading at the top of slopes by vehicular traffic, equipment or materials. Appropriate surcharge setbacks must be maintained from the top of all unshored slopes. 5.7 Foundations and Slab Recommendations The following recommendations are for preliminary planning purposes only. These foundation recommendations should be reviewed after completion of earthwork. 5.7.1 Foundations Continuous and isolated spread footings are suitable foundations for use at this site. Footings generally should not straddle cut/fill interfaces. We anticipate that all structural footings can be founded entirely upon competent native materials or properly compacted fill. Foundation should bottom at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. Foundation dimensions and reinforcement should be based on allowable bearing values of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf). The allowable bearing value may be increased by one third for short duration loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces. Footings should be at least 12 Or 15 inches wide for one- and two -story improvements. Reinforcement for continuous footings should consist of four #4 reinforcing bars; two placed near the top and two placed near the bottom. The structural engineer should provide Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 14 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G recommendations for reinforcement of any spread footings and footings with pipe penetrations. Footing excavations should generally be maintained at above optimum moisture content until concrete placement. 5.7.2 Foundation Settlement For foundations designed and constructed as recommended herein, the maximum post- construction settlement is expected to be less than 1.0 inch. Maximum differential settlement of continuous footings is expected to be on the order of 0.5 inch across the proposed structure. 5.7.3 Foundation Setback Footings for structures should be designed such that the horizontal distance from the face of adjacent slopes to the outer edge of the footing is a minimum of 10 feet. Excavations for utility trenches within 10 lateral feet should not encroach a 1:1 plane extending downward from the closest bottom edge of adjacent footings. 5.7.4 Interior Concrete Slabs Lightly loaded concrete slabs should be designed for the anticipated loading, but should be a minimum of 4.5 inches thick. Minimum slab reinforcement should consist of #3 reinforcing bars placed on 18 -inch centers, each way at mid -slab height. In moisture - sensitive floor areas, a vapor barrier of ten -mil visqueen (with all laps sealed or taped), overlying a maximum two -inch layer of consolidated aggregate base or clean sand (Sand Equivalent greater than 30) should be installed. A one- to two -inch layer of similar material may be Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 15 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G placed above the visqueen to protect the membrane during steel or concrete placement Subgrade materials shall be maintained at slightly above optimum moisture content until slab underlayment or concrete are placed. 5.8 Seismic Design Criteria In accordance with the 2006 International Building Code and the 2007 California Building Code, the subject site conforms to a Site Class D (Table 1613.5.2). In accordance with Figures 1613.5(3) and 1613.5(4), the site has mapped spectral response acceleration coefficients of S,=1.391 and S1 =0.524 (site coordinates 33.0420 degrees latitude and - 117.2879 degrees longitude). Therefore, in accordance with Tables 1613.5.3(1) and 1613.53(2), seismic coefficients F. = 1.0 and F, = 1.5 appear appropriate for the site 5.9 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures The following recommendations may be used for shallow footings on the site. Foundations placed in firm, well - compacted fill or competent formational material may be designed using a coefficient of friction of 0.30 (total frictional resistance equals coefficient of friction multiplied by the dead load). A design passive resistance value of 300 pounds per square foot per foot of depth (with a maximum value of 1500 pounds per square foot) may be used. The allowable lateral resistance can be taken as the sum of the frictional resistance and the passive resistance, provided the passive resistance does not exceed two - thirds of the total allowable resistance. Retaining walls up to 10 feet high and backfilled using granular soils may be designed using the equivalent fluid weights given in Table 4 below. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 16 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive Julv 17. 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G The values above assume non- expansive backfill and free - draining conditions. Measures should be taken to prevent moisture buildup behind all retaining walls. Drainage measures should include free draining backfill materials and perforated drains. These drains should discharge to an appropriate offsite location. Basement wall waterproofing shall be as per the project architect. 5.10 Exterior Flatwork To reduce the potential for cracking in exterior flatwork caused by minor movement of subgrade soils, and concrete shrinkage, we recommend that such flatwork be installed with crack- control joints at appropriate spacing as designed by the project architect. Additionally, we recommend that flatwork be installed with at least number 3 reinforcing bars at 24 -inch centers, each way, at mid height of slab. Flatwork, which should be installed with crack control joints, includes driveways, sidewalks, and architectural features. All subgrades should be prepared according to the earthwork recommendations previously given before placing concrete. Positive drainage should be established and maintained next to all flatwork. Subgrade materials shall be maintained at slightly above WIXY liM SLOPE BACKFILL WALL TYPE LEVEL BACKFILL 2:1 (HORIZONTAL: VERTICAL CANTILEVER WALL 35 48 (YIELDING) RESTRAINED WALL 55 75 The values above assume non- expansive backfill and free - draining conditions. Measures should be taken to prevent moisture buildup behind all retaining walls. Drainage measures should include free draining backfill materials and perforated drains. These drains should discharge to an appropriate offsite location. Basement wall waterproofing shall be as per the project architect. 5.10 Exterior Flatwork To reduce the potential for cracking in exterior flatwork caused by minor movement of subgrade soils, and concrete shrinkage, we recommend that such flatwork be installed with crack- control joints at appropriate spacing as designed by the project architect. Additionally, we recommend that flatwork be installed with at least number 3 reinforcing bars at 24 -inch centers, each way, at mid height of slab. Flatwork, which should be installed with crack control joints, includes driveways, sidewalks, and architectural features. All subgrades should be prepared according to the earthwork recommendations previously given before placing concrete. Positive drainage should be established and maintained next to all flatwork. Subgrade materials shall be maintained at slightly above Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Redlitz Residence Page 17 Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G optimum moisture content until concrete placement. 5.11 Drainage Surface runoff should be collected and directed away from improvements by means of appropriate erosion reducing devices and positive drainage should be established around the proposed improvements. Positive drainage should be directed away from improvements at a gradient of at least two percent for a distance of at least five feet. The project civil engineers should evaluate the on -site drainage and make necessary provisions to keep surface water from affecting the site. 5.12 Slopes Significant slopes are not anticipated at the site. Based on anticipated soil strength characteristics, fill slopes should be constructed at slope ratios of 2:1 (horizontal: vertical) or flatter. These fill slope inclinations should exhibit factors of safety greater than 1.5. Although properly constructed slopes on this site should be grossly stable, the soils will be somewhat erodible. Therefore, runoff water should not be permitted to drain over the edges of slopes unless that water is confined to properly designed and constructed drainage facilities. Erosion resistant vegetation should be maintained on the face of all slopes. Typically, soils along the top portion of a fill slope face will creep laterally. We do not recommend distress sensitive hardscape improvements be constructed within five feet of slope crests in fill areas or that thickened edges be employed in this area. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 18 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive Julv 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G 5.13 Construction Observation The recommendations provided in this report are based on preliminary design information for the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions observed in the exploratory test pits. The interpolated subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during construction to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Upon completion of precise grading, soil samples should be collected to evaluate as -built expansion index and soluble - sulfate content of at -grade soils. Foundation recommendations may be revised upon completion of grading, and as -built laboratory tests results. Recommendations provided in this report are based on the understanding and assumption that CTE will provide the observation and testing services for the project. All earthwork should be observed and tested to verify that grading activity has been performed according to the recommendations contained within this report. The project engineer should evaluate all footing trenches before reinforcing steel placement. 5.14 Plan Review CTE should review the project foundation plans and grading plans before commencement of earthwork to identify potential conflicts with the recommendations contained in this report. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 19 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive July 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G 6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION The field evaluation, laboratory testing and geotechnical analysis presented in this report have been conducted according to current engineering practice and the standard of care exercised by reputable geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the conclusions, recommendations and opinions expressed in this report. Variations may exist and conditions not observed or described in this report may be encountered during construction. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. Our conclusions and recommendations are based on an analysis of the observed conditions. If conditions different from those described in this report are encountered, our office should be notified and additional recommendations, if required, will be provided upon request. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 20 Proposed Redlitz Residence Vacant Lot on East Side of 800 Block of Arden Drive Julv 17, 2008 CTE Job No. 10 -9618G Respectfully submitted, ( \CCO�N�/�STR///�UCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. '/ �l Mark B. Catlin, GE #2179 Martin E. Siem, CEG# 2311 Senior Geotechnical Engineer ^ Certified Engineering Geologist DTM/MBC /MES:nri Distribution: (4) Addressee No. 2179y NAl G * Exp. 3/31/09 * Vigb,I \N s �G �9T� TECt1N�OQt�! 4 �PNo.23I11 �F CALF * ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST U'r Exp.6 /30/10 9r�OF CA0 0 �► �- 7. .� � � IBM -% • •, ? , m 1 p Ito C. IL i ,• a• .M, ruL t .fl �•' �C:e�1i Nom. MIS ��- '., •- - r a, l ,. .. Li "�- c �•`� -_ — `rte '' ` . j`_ >•`. r ��s aro .- �� 46 _ f •. •.. mss. i! •��v t •. 1 /L ■ T Lc R Ti z . r i ' 'a' �X ! Pl tz t„ F4 64d CONSTRUCTION gig 1.1�TIEL�.S�115 SITE . • PROPOSEEDLITZ VACANT LOT ON EAST SIDE OF 800 BLOCK OF ARDEN DRIVE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA +ven v 9 7., \ � _�. `�1s �• �I y \,I +t � � f � _ 1 r t , � "�y.' I r w ,+. .ty ' �. ! �_. _ .ir•�_I_ i �:/� I 1 N z. 7' a � ��.� � '�� i� "... r : �'' ' 1 ' � 1� /.` °i'" -'Ney \ l •�•e "� �� \� � ,�! /l�� /��s�j C E' .j��• -- - �.\- _ ,��.� -i ��, � �y,., l Imo_ �f -�. �, I :: �.y,uY V`i�r �' l� \'•. Js ' ` 1 _ ` wt,� I �- J \ ` r• , • I' ,\ t, . r'�,,.. '� ?ei "•� \jam "' �'. \\ t VV '� r „� �aR i •�� `\ 4 :�4 '"a "• l� '�`�� \\ \ t. •�i� u�) �^l\ f `V �• i\� \I Yr_._._ \o.` \a If1+M11 \ /. i r � �•� "� Y \S� \w`` S 29 32 .� 1 `'` `�� i•j% ' !' 1< <�'7 y-d./ % f �1 �'�h' w �\\f - V '`•, • }.j�. .k .\ `�\ '* i:.. .1 •' \� ,j(s� Sri• ,��'-r -F� A -`�. �� • �� /.. .... \lr\ ` "` '�i '►� s \\ )� \,IS `t``��'', �- S"''�� \ w, ...� � ' `` \l� ... '1, ..... L: �� 1 � °., i`t :�;, \ �� IRc\ �� \\ efK � \I 1`� y E ^S'•y .f � � 1'� ;µ �.�`' � 'a. � I. , �. rw _ ya� � . `� .,\ � � ' \a ; If • •� 1 APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION vo �� -� /' � If `<yl /�.►1V _1t`l�Jl %�y. .ri' /�l „�f . '� T v � ` ...... .':.. \+ \ \ \� .1 1 p �, � �:. \,•„ � �d,. _ti /_11 ,J �t 1 Y F'• \r,t /, �/,. `` .35 _�1-_ � r __l IKI x'i ' ------ - - - - -- ••�\ •l � � \�.a .l{W�yY. 1 1 / l f Ibm.mmba9al +lilun�a art eM•.n mrccauntirely un NalclLpuc�elNlllt � `- �` - - - - - -- I �.. —_11. 11__— ii _ i y�g �a -_. _ • 1 \, �y_ _ accom�a .P^B'c'Pn" mG arc �bemd. dnanOM.ud Mertnxd n Je App =& u>• n M• CDMG, FAULT ACTIVITY MAP OF CALIFORNIA AND ADJACENT AREAS, SCALE 1:750,000 S W. JENNINGS, 1994. I TP -1 TP -3 PROPOSED STRUCTURE PROPOSED STRUCTURE TP-4 TP -2 EXPLANATION TP -1 _ APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION I CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 111 YYOEl1IElC ROAD [SUITEF1 p5 ESCONONOO CAp ISC066PW �if6j 716 1955 I EXPLORATION LOCATION PROPOS® RSDIM RKMKNCR LUKN DRIVI @.CMLS, CMMRNU MAP 10-9618G 1 20' JVAOT75/08 2 APPENDIX A REFERENCES CITED REFERENCES CITED 2007 California Building Code, "California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume I", California Building Standards Commission, published by ICBO, 2002. 2. ASTM, 2002, "Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort", Volume 04.08. 3. Blake, T.F., 2000, "EQFAULT," Version 3.00b, Thomas F. Blake Computer Services and Software. 4. California Division of Mines and Geology, CD 2000 -003 "Digital Images of Official Maps of Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones of California, Southern Region," compiled by Martin and Ross. Construction Testing and Engineering, 2004, Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Slatton Residence, Vacant Lot South of 806 Stratford Drive, Encinitas, California, Job No. 10- 7404G, dated December 30. 6. Hart, Earl W., Revised 1994, "Fault- Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist Priolo, Special Studies Zones Act of 1972," California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42. 7. Jennings, Charles W., revised 1987, "Fault Map of California with Locations of Volcanoes, Thermal Springs and Thermal Wells." 8. Site Plan/ Roof Plan, Arden Drive Residence, Single Family Dwelling, Encinitas, scale 1/8"= I.' 9. Tan, S. S., and Gif en, 1995, "Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, San Diego County, California: Landslide Hazard Identification Map No. 35 ", California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Open -File Report 95 -04, State of California, Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento, California. 10. Tan, S. S., and Kennedy, 1996, "Geologic Map of the Encinitas and Rancho Santa Fe 7.5 Minute Quadrangles, San Diego County, California ", California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Open -File Report 96 -02, State of California, Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento, California. APPENDIX B EXPLORATION LOGS CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 8CBi1CNY1C81 I CBYBIBYCi18M EYBIM[FNIYB MAIN& IMI IN31ECM. 411 11011"t 1110. EY119 M I IB[888488. 1111111 1111.41.4811 DEFINITION OF TERMS PRIMARY DIVISIONS SYMBOLS SECONDARY DIVISIONS GRAVELS CLEAN < GW :a'° WELL GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVELSAND MIXTURES MORE THAN GRAVELS LITTLE OR NO FINES ; -Gp yt; POORLY GRADED GI AVELOFONORAVE- SAND MIXTURES, < HALF OF <5 %FRIES O COARSE GRAVELS GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEI.SANDSILT MIXTURES, 0 O FRACTION IS 0 C < V LARGER THAN WITH FINES NON - PLASTIC FINES CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES, Z; Eq NO.4 SIEVE GC PLASTIC FINES <xx w M $ SANDS CLEAN —..r -- - 1'c : y.SW =�C WELL-GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, 13111.13 OR NO FINES W F < MORE THAN SANDS _ ; SP POORLY GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, I= OR a O HALF OF < 5% FLIES Z U FRACTION IS SANDS � SM SILTY SANDS, SAND -SILT MIXTURES, NON - PLASTIC FINES SMALLER THAN WITT{ FLIES � CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-CLAY MIXTURES, PLASTIC FINES NO.4 SIEVE SC ' INORGANIC SILTS, VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY a W SILTS AND CLAYS ML OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS SLIGHTLY PLASTIC CLAYEY SILTS O j H C LIQUID LIMIT IS CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LAW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, m v < > < LESS THAN 50 GRAVELLY SANDY SILTS OR LEAN CLAYS ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC CLAYS OF LAW PLASTICITY y w ya Z zt2 nl < a $ MA INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE aZ O O SILTS AND CLAYS SANDY OR SILTY SOILS ELASTIC SILTS INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS Z < LIQUID LIMIT IS f.H w F GREATER THAN 50 ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS p.l. PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOLES GRAIN SIZES �� BOULDERS COBBLES SILTS AND CLAYS COARSE FINE COARSE I MEDiUMT FINE 12" 311 3/411 4 10 40 200 CLEAR SQUARE SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE ADDITIONAL TESTS (OTHER THAN TEST PIT AND BORING LOG COLUMN HEADINGS) MAX- Maximum Dry Density PM- Permeability PP- Pocket Penetrometer GS- Grain Size Distribution SG- Specific Gravity WA- Wash Analysis SE- Sand Equivalent HA- Hydrometer Analysis DS- Direct Shear EI- Expansion Index AL- Atterberg Limits UC- Unconfined Compression CHM- Sulfate and Chloride RV- R -Value MD- Moisture/Density Content, pH, Resistivity CN- Consolidation M- Moisture COR - Corrosivity CP- Collapse Potential SC- Swell Compression SD- Sample Disturbed HC- Hydrocollapse OI- Organic Impurities REM- Remolded FIGURE: BLl CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 8[pn[xn[u I caxslA U[uox Ex[unllup ila o Ixan[uae � n Yphlpl Apap IYIII nl I IhIOAAIpp, [[ 1)ttl I !{11[1 i[hl PROJECT. DRILLER: SHEET: Of CTE JOB NO DRILL METHOD: DRILLING DATE: LOGGED BY SAMPLE METHOD: ELEVATION: V p `r tE BORING LEGEND Laboratory Tests �€ E V = z 6 v � p � V t DESCRIPTION ll Block or Chunk Sample Bulk Sample 5 Standard Penetration Test 1 Modified Split -Bartel Drive Sampler (Cal Sampler) Thin Walled Army Corp. of Eneineers Sample )s Groundwater Table Z --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Soil Type or Classification Change 2 Formation Change [(Approximate boundaries queried MI ••SM" Ouotes are placed around classifications where the soils exist in situ as bedrock 25 FIGURE: BL2 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 11J1111M1111 I C1111.9c'm Fun111o1 IIOIYC . ulnniu ml Wlllll 1111, (1111 III 1160FCO .011DY , 1z., 1111 PROJECT: REDRSZ RESIDENCE EXCAVATOR: BRANDONSBACKHOE CTE JOB NO: 10 -9618G EXCAVATION METHOD: CAT 430E BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 6/19/2008 LOGGED BY: AJB SAMPLING METHOD: BULK ELEVATION: 147 feet n E H s TEST PIT LOG: TP -1 Laboratory Tests ' N Y U DESCRIPTION 0 TOPSOIL, Silty fine grained SAND, red -brown, dry to damp, loose; roots present throughout. SM SM QUATERNARY TERRACE DEPOSITS (Oop2 -41, Silty fine grained SAND, red brown, damp, dense to very dense; oxidized, moderately cemented, traces of clay and manganeze nodules present, moderate pinhole MAX, CHM porosity, tight discontinuous vertical fracture with roots preseni from approximatelly 0 -7' with an orentation of approximately (N 50'W). z 1 Total Depth 12' I_ No Groundwater Encountered CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. MUCHMlest I Ce11s"U' uM MIMIKn, rearm ua'"'Plena• un W1.111t INa. Wit 111 CIe0MW CI Hon 1 III I's on PROJECT: REDILTZ RESIDENCE EXCAVATOR: BRANDON$ BACKHOE CTE JOB NO: 10 -9618G EXCAVATION METHOD: CAT 430E BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 6/19/2008 LOGGED BY: AJB SAMPLINGMETHOD: BULK ELEVATION: 151 feet s LL N TEST PIT LOG: TP -2 I aboraton Tests .6 u TIN, v g � DESCRIPTION TOPSOIL, Silty ine grained SAND, red brown, to ry � dry damP, loose: roots present throughout. SM QUATERNARY TERRACE DEPOSITS (Oov2 -4), Silty fine grained SAND, red brown, damp, dense to very dense; SM oxidized, moderately cemented, few 1/4" roots, traces of clay and manganese nodules present throughout. 5 1 Total Depth 12' No Groundwater Encountered 1. CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 1111f1LXIIIC \I I Cnlnrcilel Euulluu rflnlll &NO INSIMION I'll 11111161 hill. 1"If nl I ntetllll LI IUII 1111.111.1111 PROJECT: REDrLTZ RESIDENCE EXCAVATOR: BRANDONS BACKHOE CTE JOB NO: 10 -96186 EXCAVATION METHOD: CAT 430E BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 6/19/2008 LAGGED BY: AJB SAMPLING METHOD: BULK ELEVATION: 152 feet H TEST PIT LOG: TP -3 Laboratory Tests Vl w Ci N 6 y C F � U m ❑ DESCRIPTION 0 TOPS IL, Silty fine grained SAND, red - brown, dry to damp, dense to very dense; roots present throughout. SM SM QUATERNARY TERRACE DEPOSITS (OOD 24), Silty fine grained SAND, red brown, damp, dense to very dense; oxidized, moderately cemented, moderate pinhole porosity, few 1 /8" diameter roots present. 5 Total Depth 5' I 1. No Groundwater CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. b..teenut I coo n....... E..otooue ranee ..1 unmet. Nn No."It 11ee. som ne 1 IIOe01ee. el 1111. 11.. rU 1..1 PROJECT: REDILTZ RESIDENCE EXCAVATOR: BRANDONS BACKHOE CTE JOB NO: 10 -96186 EXCAVATON METHOD: CAT 430E BACKHOE EXCAVATION DATE: 6/19/2008 LOGGED BY: AJB SAMPLING METHOD: BULK ELEVATION: 143 feet ri n E H s Ex TEST PIT LOG: TP -4 Laboratory Tests Y g a y E DESCRIPTION 0 S TOPSOIL, Silty fine grained SAND, red -brown, dry to damp, loose; roots present throughout. QUATERNARY TERRACE DEPOSITS (Ooo241, Silty fine grained SAND, red -brown, damp, dense to very SM dense; oxidized, moderately cemented, few 1/8 "roots and traces of clay present throughout. GS 5 Total Depth 5' No Groundwater Encountered l I APPENDIX C LABORATORY METHODS AND RESULTS APPENDIX C LABORATORY METHODS AND RESULTS Laboratory Testing Program Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to detect their relative engineering properties. Tests were performed following test methods of the American Society for Testing Materials or other accepted standards. The following presents a brief description of the various test methods used. Classification Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Visual classifications were supplemented by laboratory testing of selected samples according to ASTM D2487. The soil classifications are shown on the Exploration Logs in Appendix B. Chemical Analysis Soil materials were collected with sterile sampling equipment and tested for Sulfate and Chloride content, pH, Corrosivity, and Resistivity. Modified Proctor Laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were evaluated according to ASTM D 1557, Method A. A mechanically operated rammer was used during the compaction process. Particle -Size Analysis Particle -size analyses were performed on selected representative samples according to ASTM D 422. CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. B[OM"NiC11 I COYI71YC110X FYYI AT ..4 1[ll1Yi YYO IYiY1C110Y 1441110NIRL 0049.1011111[ I FCCOOIU. 4 11111 1 10111,111 MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 LOCATION DEPTH MAXIUM DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE TP -I SULFATE LOCATION DEPTH RESULTS (feet) PPM TP -1 0 -5' 109.8 LOCATION CHLORIDE DEPTH (feet) 0 -5' PH RESULTS 32.9 LOCATION DEPTH RESULTS (feet) TP -1 0 -51 7.44 CONDUCTIVITY CALIFORNIA TEST 424 LOCATION DEPTH RESULTS (feet) us/cm TP -1 0 -5' 130.2 LOCATION TP-1 LABORATORY SUMMARY RESISTIVITY CALIFORNIA TEST 424 DEPTH RESULTS 7680 1:1 CTE JOB NO. 10 -9618G U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE p [V n 10 p 00 O O no O O O 100 90 80 — 70 60 — Z h H d 50 F Z U 40 o. 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 o fv PARTICLE SIZE (mm) PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING INC. Sample Sample Depth (fm) srm l Lp w l.m l W cwy 1M . Cb—,,, , TP -4 0 -5 • - Sit •197:. ,..... ..,. ,... tt ,.. a.. 1........ 0 0 ■ 0 0 0 7l, .,7 CTE JOB NUMBER: 10 -9618G FIGURE: C -1 APPENDIX D STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Appendix D Standard Specifications for Grading Section 1 - General Page D -1 Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. presents the following standard recommendations for grading and other associated operations on construction projects. These guidelines should be considered a portion of the project specifications. Recommendations contained in the body of the previously presented soils report shall supersede the recommendations and or requirements as specified herein. The project geotechnical consultant shall interpret disputes arising out of interpretation of the recommendations contained in the soils report or specifications contained herein. Section 2 - Responsibilities of Project Personnel The geotechnical consultant should provide observation and testing services sufficient to general conformance with project specifications and standard grading practices. The geotechnical consultant should report any deviations to the client or his authorized representative. The Client should be chiefly responsible for all aspects of the project. He or his authorized representative has the responsibility of reviewing the findings and recommendations of the geotechnical consultant. He shall authorize or cause to have authorized the Contractor and/or other consultants to perform work and/or provide services. During grading the Client or his authorized representative should remain on -site or should remain reasonably accessible to all concerned parties in order to make decisions necessary to maintain the flow of the project. The Contractor is responsible for the safety of the project and satisfactory completion of all grading and other associated operations on construction projects, including, but not limited to, earth work in accordance with the project plans, specifications and controlling agency requirements. Section 3 - Preconstruction Meeting A preconstruction site meeting should be arranged by the owner and/or client and should include the grading contractor, design engineer, geotechnical consultant, owner's representative and representatives of the appropriate goveming authorities. Section 4 - Site Preparation The client or contractor should obtain the required approvals from the controlling authorities for the project prior, during and/or after demolition, site preparation and removals, etc. The appropriate approvals should be obtained prior to proceeding with grading operations. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 1 of 24 Appendix D Page D -2 Standard Specifications for Grading Clearing and grubbing should consist of the removal of vegetation such as brush, grass, woods, stumps, trees, root of trees and otherwise deleterious natural materials from the areas to be graded. Clearing and grubbing should extend to the outside of all proposed excavation and fill areas. Demolition should include removal of buildings, structures, foundations, reservoirs, utilities (including underground pipelines, septic tanks, leach fields, seepage pits, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, etc.) and other man -made surface and subsurface improvements from the areas to be graded. Demolition of utilities should include proper capping and/or rerouting pipelines at the project perimeter and cutoff and capping of wells in accordance with the requirements of the governing authorities and the recommendations of the geotechnical consultant at the time of demolition. Trees, plants or man -made improvements not planned to be removed or demolished should be protected by the contractor from damage or injury. Debris generated during clearing, grubbing and/or demolition operations should be wasted from areas to be graded and disposed off -site. Clearing, grubbing and demolition operations should be performed under the observation of the geotechnical consultant. Section 5 - Site Protection Protection of the site during the period of grading should be the responsibility of the contractor. Unless other provisions are made in writing and agreed upon among the concerned parties, completion of a portion of the project should not be considered to preclude that portion or adjacent areas from the requirements for site protection until such time as the entire project is complete as identified by the geotechnical consultant, the client and the regulating agencies. Precautions should be taken during the performance of site clearing, excavations and grading to protect the work site from flooding, ponding or inundation by poor or improper surface drainage. Temporary provisions should be made during the rainy season to adequately direct surface drainage away from and off the work site. Where low areas cannot be avoided, pumps should be kept on hand to continually remove water during periods of rainfall. Rain related damage should be considered to include, but may not be limited to, erosion, silting, saturation, swelling, structural distress and other adverse conditions as determined by the geotechnical consultant. Soil adversely affected should be classified as unsuitable materials and should be subject to overexcavation and replacement with compacted fill or other remedial grading as recommended by the geotechnical consultant. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 2 of 24 Appendix D Page D -3 Standard Specifications for Grading The contractor should be responsible for the stability of all temporary excavations. Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant pertaining to temporary excavations (e.g., backcuts) are made in consideration of stability of the completed project and, therefore, should not be considered to preclude the responsibilities of the contractor. Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant should not be considered to preclude requirements that are more restrictive by the regulating agencies. The contractor should provide during periods of extensive rainfall plastic sheeting to prevent unprotected slopes from becoming saturated and unstable. When deemed appropriate by the geotechnical consultant or governing agencies the contractor shall install checkdams, desilting basins, sand bags or other drainage control measures. In relatively level areas and/or slope areas, where saturated soil and/or erosion gullies exist to depths of greater than 1.0 foot; they should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill in accordance with the applicable specifications. Where affected materials exist to depths of 1.0 foot or less below proposed fmished grade, remedial grading by moisture conditioning in- place, followed by thorough recompaction in accordance with the applicable grading guidelines herein may be attempted. If the desired results are not achieved, all affected materials should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill in accordance with the slope repair recommendations herein. If field conditions dictate, the geotechnical consultant may recommend other slope repair procedures. Section 6 - Excavations 6.1 Unsuitable Materials Materials that are unsuitable should be excavated under observation and recommendations of the geotechnical consultant. Unsuitable materials include, but may not be limited to, dry, loose, soft, wet, organic compressible natural soils and fractured, weathered, soft bedrock and nonengineered or otherwise deleterious fill materials. Material identified by the geotechnical consultant as unsatisfactory due to its moisture conditions should be overexcavated; moisture conditioned as needed, to a uniform at or above optimum moisture condition before placement as compacted fill. If during the course of grading adverse geotechnical conditions are exposed which were not anticipated in the preliminary soil report as determined by the geotechnical consultant additional exploration, analysis, and treatment of these problems may be recommended. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 3 of 24 Appendix D Standard Specifications for Grading Page D -4 6.2 Cut Slopes Unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant and approved by the regulating agencies, permanent cut slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 (horizontal: vertical). The geotechnical consultant should observe cut slope excavation and if these excavations expose loose cohesionless, significantly fractured or otherwise unsuitable material, the materials should be overexcavated and replaced with a compacted stabilization fill. If encountered specific cross section details should be obtained from the Geotechnical Consultant. When extensive cut slopes are excavated or these cut slopes are made in the direction of the prevailing drainage, a non - erodible diversion swale (brow ditch) should be provided at the top of the slope. 6.3 Pad Area All lot pad areas, including side yard terrace containing both cut and fill materials, transitions, located less than 3 feet deep should be overexcavated to a depth of 3 feet and replaced with a uniform compacted fill blanket of 3 feet. Actual depth of overexcavation may vary and should be delineated by the geotechnical consultant during grading, especially where deep or drastic transitions are present. For pad areas created above cut or natural slopes, positive drainage should be established away from the top -of- slope. This may be accomplished utilizing a berm drainage swale and/or an appropriate pad gradient. A gradient in soil areas away from the top -of- slopes of 2 percent or greater is recommended. Section 7 - Compacted Fill All fill materials should have fill quality, placement, conditioning and compaction as specified below or as approved by the geotechnical consultant. 7.1 Fill Material Ouality Excavated on -site or import materials which are acceptable to the geotechnical consultant may be utilized as compacted fill, provided trash, vegetation and other deleterious materials are removed prior to placement. All import materials anticipated for use on -site should be sampled tested and approved prior to and placement is in conformance with the requirements outlined. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 4 of 24 Appendix D Standard Specifications for Grading Page D -5 Rocks 12 inches in maximum and smaller may be utilized within compacted fill provided sufficient fill material is placed and thoroughly compacted over and around all rock to effectively fill rock voids. The amount of rock should not exceed 40 percent by dry weight passing the 314 -inch sieve. The geotechnical consultant may vary those requirements as field conditions dictate. Where rocks greater than 12 inches but less than four feet of maximum dimension are generated during grading, or otherwise desired to be placed within an engineered fill, special handling in accordance with the recommendations below. Rocks greater than four feet should be broken down or disposed off -site. 7.2 Placement of Fill Prior to placement of fill material, the geotechnical consultant should observe and approve the area to receive fill. After observation and approval, the exposed ground surface should be scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches. The scarified material should be conditioned (i.e. moisture added or air dried by continued discing) to achieve a moisture content at or slightly above optimum moisture conditions and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum density or as otherwise recommended in the soils report or by appropriate government agencies. Compacted fill should then be placed in thin horizontal lifts not exceeding eight inches in loose thickness prior to compaction. Each lift should be moisture conditioned as needed, thoroughly blended to achieve a consistent moisture content at or slightly above optimum and thoroughly compacted by mechanical methods to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum dry density. Each lift should be treated in a like manner until the desired finished grades are achieved. The contractor should have suitable and sufficient mechanical compaction equipment and watering apparatus on the job site to handle the amount of fill being placed in consideration of moisture retention properties of the materials and weather conditions. When placing fill in horizontal lifts adjacent to areas sloping steeper than 5:1 (horizontal: vertical), horizontal keys and vertical benches should be excavated into the adjacent slope area. Keying and benching should be sufficient to provide at least six -foot wide benches and a minimum of four feet of vertical bench height within the firm natural ground, firm bedrock or engineered compacted fill. No compacted fill should be placed in an area after keying and benching until the geotechnical consultant has reviewed the area. Material generated by the benching operation should be moved sufficiently away from STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 5 of 24 Appendix D Standard Specifications for Grading Page D -6 the bench area to allow for the recommended review of the horizontal bench prior to placement of fill. Within a single fill area where grading procedures dictate two or more separate fills, temporary slopes (false slopes) may be created. When placing fill adjacent to a false slope, benching should be conducted in the same manner as above described. At least a 3 -foot vertical bench should be established within the firm core of adjacent approved compacted fill prior to placement of additional fill. Benching should proceed in at least 3 -foot vertical increments until the desired finished grades are achieved. Prior to placement of additional compacted fill following an overnight or other grading delay, the exposed surface or previously compacted fill should be processed by scarification, moisture conditioning as needed to at or slightly above optimum moisture content, thoroughly blended and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum dry density. Where unsuitable materials exist to depths of greater than one foot, the unsuitable materials should be over - excavated. Following a period of flooding, rainfall or overwatering by other means, no additional fill should be placed until damage assessments have been made and remedial grading performed as described herein. Rocks 12 inch in maximum dimension and smaller may be utilized in the compacted fill provided the fill is placed and thoroughly compacted over and around all rock. No oversize material should be used within 3 feet of finished pad grade and within 1 foot of other compacted fill areas. Rocks 12 inches up to four feet maximum dimension should be placed below the upper 10 feet of any fill and should not be closer than 15 feet to any slope face. These recommendations could vary as locations of improvements dictate. Where practical, oversized material should not be placed below areas where structures or deep utilities are proposed. Oversized material should be placed in windrows on a clean, overexcavated or unyielding compacted fill or firm natural ground surface. Select native or imported granular soil (S.E. 30 or higher) should be placed and thoroughly flooded over and around all windrowed rock, such that voids are filled. Windrows of oversized material should be staggered so those successive strata of oversized material are not in the same vertical plane. It may be possible to dispose of individual larger rock as field conditions dictate and as recommended by the geotechnical consultant at the time of placement. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 6 of 24 Appendix D Standard Specifications for Grading Page D -7 The contractor should assist the geotechnical consultant and/or his representative by digging test pits for removal determinations and/or for testing compacted fill. The contractor should provide this work at no additional cost to the owner or contractor's client. Fill should be tested by the geotechnical consultant for compliance with the recommended relative compaction and moisture conditions. Field density testing should conform to ASTM Method of Test D 1556 -00, D 2922 -04. Tests should be conducted at a minimum of approximately two vertical feet or approximately 1,000 to 2,000 cubic yards of fill placed. Actual test intervals may vary as field conditions dictate. Fill found not to be in conformance with the grading recommendations should be removed or otherwise handled as recommended by the geotechnical consultant. 7.3 Fill Slopes Unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant and approved by the regulating agencies, permanent fill slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 (horizontal: vertical). Except as specifically recommended in these grading guidelines compacted fill slopes should be over -built two to five feet and cut back to grade, exposing the firm, compacted fill inner core. The actual amount of overbuilding may vary as field conditions dictate. If the desired results are not achieved, the existing slopes should be overexcavated and reconstructed under the guidelines of the geotechnical consultant. The degree of overbuilding shall be increased until the desired compacted slope surface condition is achieved. Care should be taken by the contractor to provide thorough mechanical compaction to the outer edge of the overbuilt slope surface. At the discretion of the geotechnical consultant, slope face compaction may be attempted by conventional construction procedures including backrolling. The procedure must create a family compacted material throughout the entire depth of the slope face to the surface of the previously compacted firm fill intercore. During grading operations, care should be taken to extend compactive effort to the outer edge of the slope. Each lift should extend horizontally to the desired finished slope surface or more as needed to ultimately established desired grades. Grade during construction should not be allowed to roll off at the edge of the slope. It may be helpful to elevate slightly the outer edge of the slope. Slough resulting from the placement of individual lifts should not be allowed to drift down over previous lifts. At intervals not STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 7 of 24 Appendix D Page D -8 Standard Specifications for Grading exceeding four feet in vertical slope height or the capability of available equipment, whichever is less, fill slopes should be thoroughly dozer trackrolled. For pad areas above fill slopes, positive drainage should be established away from the top -of- slope. This may be accomplished using a berm and pad gradient of at least two percent. Section 8 - Trench Backfill Utility and/or other excavation of trench backfill should, unless otherwise recommended, be compacted by mechanical means. Unless otherwise recommended, the degree of compaction should be a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density. Within slab areas, but outside the influence of foundations, trenches up to one foot wide and two feet deep may be backfilled with sand and consolidated by jetting, flooding or by mechanical means. If on -site materials are utilized, they should be wheel - rolled, tamped or otherwise compacted to a firm condition. For minor interior trenches, density testing may be deleted or spot testing may be elected if deemed necessary, based on review of backfill operations during construction. If utility contractors indicate that it is undesirable to use compaction equipment in close proximity to a buried conduit, the contractor may elect the utilization of light weight mechanical compaction equipment and/or shading of the conduit with clean, granular material, which should be thoroughly jetted in -place above the conduit, prior to initiating mechanical compaction procedures. Other methods of utility trench compaction may also be appropriate, upon review of the geotechnical consultant at the time of construction. In cases where clean granular materials are proposed for use in lieu of native materials or where flooding or jetting is proposed, the procedures should be considered subject to review by the geotechnical consultant. Clean granular backfill and/or bedding are not recommended in slope areas. Section 9 - Draina¢e Where deemed appropriate by the geotechnical consultant, canyon subdrain systems should be installed in accordance with CTE's recommendations during grading. Typical subdrains for compacted fill buttresses, slope stabilization or sidehill masses, should be installed in accordance with the specifications. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 8 of 24 Appendix D Standard Specifications for Grading Page D -9 Roof, pad and slope drainage should be directed away from slopes and areas of structures to suitable disposal areas via non - erodible devices (i.e., gutters, downspouts, and concrete swales). For drainage in extensively landscaped areas near structures, (i.e., within four feet) a minimum of 5 percent gradient away from the structure should be maintained. Pad drainage of at least 2 percent should be maintained over the remainder of the site. Drainage patterns established at the time of fine grading should be maintained throughout the life of the project. Property owners should be made aware that altering drainage patterns could be detrimental to slope stability and foundation performance. Section 10 - Slope Maintenance 10.1 - Landscape Plants To enhance surficial slope stability, slope planting should be accomplished at the completion of grading. Slope planting should consist of deep- rooting vegetation requiring little watering. Plants native to the southern California area and plants relative to native plants are generally desirable. Plants native to other semi -arid and and areas may also be appropriate. A Landscape Architect should be the best party to consult regarding actual types of plants and planting configuration. 10.2 - Irrigation Irrigation pipes should be anchored to slope faces, not placed in trenches excavated into slope faces. Slope irrigation should be minimized. If automatic timing devices are utilized on irrigation systems, provisions should be made for interrupting normal irrigation during periods of rainfall. 10.3 - Renair As a precautionary measure, plastic sheeting should be readily available, or kept on hand, to protect all slope areas from saturation by periods of heavy or prolonged rainfall. This measure is strongly recommended, beginning with the period prior to landscape planting. If slope failures occur, the geotechnical consultant should be contacted for a field review of site conditions and development of recommendations for evaluation and repair. If slope failures occur as a result of exposure to period of heavy rainfall, the failure areas and currently unaffected areas should be covered with plastic sheeting to protect against additional saturation. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 9 024 Appendix D Standard Specifications for Grading Page D -10 In the accompanying Standard Details, appropriate repair procedures are illustrated for superficial slope failures (i.e., occurring typically within the outer one foot to three feet of a slope face). STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 10 of 24 BENCHING FILL OVER NATURAL SURFACE OF FIRM EARTH MATERIAL FILL SLOPE Mp,•ERIA� 5' MIN 1- MOVEI E 4' TYPICAL 2' MIN 2% MIN 10 15' MIN. (INCLINED 2% MIN. INTO SLOPE) BENCHING FILL OVER CUT SURFACE OF FIRM EARTH MATERIAL FINISH FILL SLOPE FINISH CUT At R pi SLOPE — /vNgU1T% 4' TYPICAL iMOV% 2°/ MIN / 10' TYPIC 15' MIN OR STABILITY EQUIVALENT PER SOIL ENGINEERING (INCLINED 2% MIN. INTO SLOPE) NOT TO SCALE BENCHING FOR COMPACTED FILL DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 11 of 24 TOE OF SLOPE SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN FILL L i i i MINIMUM --J 15' MINIMUM BASE KEY WIDTH DOWNSLOPE KEY DEPTH 10' TYPICAL BENCH COMPETENT EARTH MATERIAL TYPICAL BENCH HEIGHT PROVIDE BACKDRAIN AS REQUIRED PER RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOILS ENGINEER DURING GRADING WHERE NATURAL SLOPE GRADIENT IS 5:1 OR LESS, BENCHING IS NOT NECESSARY. FILL IS NOT TO BE PLACED ON COMPRESSIBLE OR UNSUITABLE MATERIAL. NOT TO SCALE FILL SLOPE ABOVE NATURAL GROUND DETAIL I STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 12 of 24 REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL, COLLUVIUM, AND CREEP MATERIAL FROM TRANSITION CUT /FILL CONTACT SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN FILL z CUT /FILL CONTACT SHOWN D ON "AS- BUILT" CaEE � M PAO � �jpPSp11� 4' TYPICAL / �m CD T NATURAL C] TOPOGRAPHY 2% MIN 10' TYPICAL W > ' N) 2 �' 15' MINIMUM a cn CUT SLOPE' BEDROCK OR APPROVED T ' FOUNDATION MATERIAL O D O Z 'NOTE: CUT SLOPE PORTION SHOULD BE MADE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL NOT TO SCALE FILL SLOPE ABOVE CUT SLOPE DETAIL SURFACE OF COMPETENT MATERIAL \ COMPACTED FILL / \ \ / TYPICAL BENCHING \ / REMOVE UNSUITABLE C MATERIAL SEE DETAIL BELOW INCLINE TOWARD DRAIN AT 2% GRADIENT MINIMUM DETAIL MINIMUM 9 FT' PER LINEAR FOOT OF APPROVED FILTER MATERIAL FILTER MATERIAL TO MEET FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION OR APPROVED EQUAL: SIEVE SIZE 1" )1a' NO.4 NO. 30 NO.8 NO. 50 NO. 200 14' PERCENTAGE PASSING 100 90 -100 40 -100 25-40 18 -33 5-15 0 -7 MINIMUM 4' DIAMETER APPROVED PERFORATED PIPE (PERFORATIONS DOWN) 6' FILTER MATERIAL BEDDING APPROVED PIPE TO BE SCHEDULE 40 POLY- VINYL - CHLORIDE (P.V.C.) OR APPROVED EQUAL. MINIMUM CRUSH STRENGTH 1000 psi PIPE DIAMETER TO MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, SUBJECT TO FIELD REVIEW BASED ON ACTUAL GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED DURING GRADING LENGTH OF RUN PIPE DIAMETER INITIAL 500' 4' 0 -3 NOT TO SCALE 500' TO 1500' 6" > 1500' 8' TYPICAL CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL I STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 14 of 24 CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAILS SURFACE OF COMPETENT MATERIAL \ COMPACTED FILL / TYPICAL BENCHING REMOVE UNSUITABLE o MATERIAL SEE DETAILS BELOW INCLINE TOWARD DRAIN AT 2% GRADIENT MINIMUM TRENCH DETAILS _ 6" MINIMUM OVERLAP OPTIONAL V -DITCH DETAIL �� MINIMUM 9 FT' PER LINEAR FOOT OF APPROVED DRAIN MATERIAL MIRAFI 140N FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUAL 6' MINIMUM OVERLAP 0 24" MINIMUM L-J 24" MINIMUM 9 FT' PER LINEAR FOOT OF APPROVED DRAIN MATERIAL 60° TO 90' DRAIN MATERIAL TO MEET FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION OR APPROVED EQUAL: SIEVE SIZE PERCENTAGE PASSING 1 Yi 88 -100 1' 5 -40 314- 0 -17 Ye" 0 -7 NO. 200 0 -3 MIRAFI 140N FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUAL APPROVED PIPE TO BE SCHEDULE 40 POLY - VINYLCHLORIDE (P.V.C.) OR APPROVED EQUAL. MINIMUM CRUSH STRENGTH 1000 PSI. PIPE DIAMETER TO MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA. SUBJECT TO FIELD REVIEW BASED ON ACTUAL GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED DURING GRADING LENGTH OF RUN INITIAL 500' 500' TO 1500' > 1500' NOT TO SCALE GEOFABRIC SUBDRAIN STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 15 of 24 PIPE DIAMETER 4' 6' 8" 1 12' 15' MINIMUM 4" DIAMETER PERFORATED PIPE BACKDRAIN 4" DIAMETER NON - PERFORATED PIPE LATERAL DRAIN SLOPE PER PLAN I FILTER MATERIAL —� _I - BENCHING H/2 i _i i i�l ' 1 AN ADDITIONAL BACKDRAIN AT MID -SLOPE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR SLOPE IN EXCESS OF 40 FEET HIGH. KEY - DIMENSION PER SOILS ENGINEER (GENERALLY 1/2 SLOPE HEIGHT, 15' MINIMUM) DIMENSIONS ARE MINIMUM RECOMMENDED NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL SLOPE STABILIZATION FILL DETAIL I STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING I Page 16 of 24 DIMENSIONS ARE MINIMUM RECOMMENDED NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL BUTTRESS FILL DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING I Page 17 of 24 FINAL LIMIT OF DAYLIGHT EXCAVATION LINE FINISH PAD OVEREXCAVATE 3' AND REPLACE WITH COMPACTED FILL OVEREXCAVATE 20' MAXIMUM — I J/� f MIN \ v4 - \— 1 - COMPETENT BEDROCK 2' MINIMUM �� TYPICAL BENCHING OVERBURDEN LOCATION OF BACKDRAIN AND (CREEP- PRONE) OUTLETS PER SOILS ENGINEER AND /OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST DURING GRADING. MINIMUM 2% FLOW GRADIENT TO DISCHARGE LOCATION. EQUIPMENT WIDTH (MINIMUM 15') NOT TO SCALE DAYLIGHT SHEAR KEY DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 18 of 24 NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING 1 Z 1.5 COMPACTED FILL ' 1.5 V PROVIDE BACKDRAIN, PER BACKDRAIN DETAIL. AN ' ADDITIONAL BACKDRAIN AT MID -SLOPE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR BACK BASE WIDTH "W" DETERMINED SLOPES IN EXCESS OF BY SOILS ENGINEER 40 FEET HIGH. LOCATIONS OF BACKDRAINS AND OUTLETS PER SOILS ENGINEER AND /OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST DURING GRADING. MINIMUM 2% FLOW GRADIENT TO DISCHARGE LOCATION. NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL SHEAR KEY DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 19 of 24 FINISH SURFACE SLOPE 3 FT' MINIMUM PER LINEAR FOOT APPROVED FILTER ROCK' CONCRETE COLLAR PLACED NEAT 4' MINIMUM DIAMETER SOLID OUTLET PIPE SPACED PER SOIL ENGINEER REQUIREMENTS DURING GRADING COMPACTED FILL TYPICAL BENCHING nFTAII A -A 4" MINIMUM APPROVED PERFORATED PIPE" (PERFORATIONS DOWN) MINIMUM 2% GRADIENT TO OUTLET BENCH INCLINED TOWARD DRAIN TEMPORARY FILL LEVEL MINIMUM �rvirr,i. ` MINIMUM 4" DIAMETER APPROVED 12" COVER BACKFILL SOLID OUTLET PIPE 12" MINIMUM 'FILTER ROCK TO MEET FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS OR APPROVED EQUAL: "APPROVED PIPE TYPE: SCHEDULE 40 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE SIEVE SIZE PERCENTAGE PASSING (P.V.C.) OR APPROVED EQUAL. 1" 100 MINIMUM CRUSH STRENGTH 1000 PSI a- 90 -100 a- 40 -100 NO.4 25-40 NO 30 5 -15 NO 50 0 -7 NO. 200 0 -3 NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL BACKDRAIN DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 20 of 24 FINISH SURFACE SLOPE MINIMUM 3 FT' PER LINEAR FOOT OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE' TAPE AND SEAL AT COVER CONCRETE COLLAR PLACED NEAT MINIMUM 4' DIAMETER SOLID OUTLET PIPE SPACED PER SOIL ENGINEER REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM 12' COVER 'NOTE: AGGREGATE TO MEET FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS OR APPROVED EQUAL: SIEVE SIZE PERCENTAGE PASSING 1 Y2" 100 1" 5 -40 COMPACTED FILL TYPICAL BENCHING ia��r�� BACKFILL 12` Yi 0 -17 Ye' 0 -7 NOT TO SCALE NO. 200 0 -3 J MIRAFI 140N FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUAL 4- MINIMUM APPROVED PERFORATED PIPE (PERFORATIONS DOWN) MINIMUM 2% GRADIENT TO OUTLET BENCH INCLINED TOWARD DRAIN TEMPORARY FILL LEVEL MINIMUM 4' DIAMETER APPROVED SOLID OUTLET PIPE BACKDRAIN DETAIL (GEOFRABIC) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 21 of 24 FILL SLOPE CLEAR ZONE SOIL SHALL BE PUSHED OVER W EQUIPMENT WIDTH ROCKS AND FLOODED INTO VOIDS. COMPACT AROUND AND OVER EACH WINDROW. STACK BOULDERS END TO END. DO NOT PILE UPON EACH OTHER. 10' FILL SLOPE ,�c --7:7 --T) ° o o 10' MIN STAGGER 15 ROWS O o % ET NT AP �At, NOT TO SCALE ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 22 of 24 Melrj: STREET 31kxMI.T4-9xr7:7_Tdl BUILDING I NO OVERSIZE, AREA FOR 10' FOUNDATION, UTILITIES AND SWIMMING POOLS 0 0 15' q 15' WINDROW S MINIMUM OR BELOW DEPTH OF DEEPEST UTILITY TRENCH (WHICHEVER GREATER) TYPICAL WINDROW DETAIL (EDGE VIEW) PROFILE VIEW NOT TO SCALE ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 23 of 24 GENERAL GRADING RECOMMENDATIONS CUT LOT ��8:18➢.01 GROUND TOPSOIL, COLLUVIUM AND WEATHERED BEDROCK 5' MIN 5' ��i i 3' MIN / UNWEATHERED BEDROCK CUT /FILL LOT (TRANSITION) COMPACTED FILL / TOP501L- COLLUVIUM WEATHERED i BEDROCK ~— i i AND REGRADE i Ic i � � 7 UNWEATHERED BEDROCK NOT TO SCALE TRANSITION LOT DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 24 Of 24 ORIGINAL 'GROUND MIN ' S MIN OVEREXCAVATE AND REGRADE �E' ua~ a?Sempra Energy*uttlule5 January 12, 2009 Sampo Engineering, Inc. 1034 Second Street Encinitas, Ca 92024ox 3268 To: Romeo Pelagio, Sampo Engineering Ruben Macabit, City of Encinitas RE: APN 258- 233 -09, Arden Dr., Encinitas Job # 08 -118, Redlitz Residence Malty Dana Land Management Rep. CPI1D 8335 Century Park Court San Diego, CA 92113-1569 Tel: 858 6541238 Paa: 858 6541263 M Dana �bsempr au I i li tes.c om In accordance with your request, San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG &E) has researched the easements on the above property located in Book 1866, Page 147, of the official records recorded February 17, 1931, County of San Diego, California. You have requested permission to build a retaining wall located within the existing six foot wide casement located along the eastern property line of parcel 258- 223 -09. This easement contains existing overhead 12kV electric lines and a single wood pole ( #P27242). If appropriate clearances are met and the existing grade around P27242 does not change, SDG &E would allow the retaining per the attached drawing No. 10041 -G that includes an unobstructed, Flat and level, 5 foot notched area for working space around P27242 to be built under the following conditions: The wire to ground clearances need to be met per the attached standard page 224.1. If the trenching and footings for your retaining wall encroach within 5 feet of P27242, please see the attached standard 372 and contact your planner Saretha Reed for related costs and coordination (a,) 760 476 -5610. Please call Dig Alert at least seven days prior to any digging at 1 -800- 227 -2600. All SDG &E and CAL -OSHA clearance and working space requirements must be met when excavating around the existing utilities in the rear of the property. If you have any additional questions regarding SDG &E land rights, please feel free to call me at (619) 654 -1238. Sincerely, Molly Dana Land Management Representative 858 654 -1238 ark Sampo EnEineerin2jnc. Land Planning, Civil Engineering, Surveying, Mapping DESCRIPTION Clear & Grub Grading - Excavate & Export Grading - Excavate & Fill Porous Conc Driveway Concrete Driveway AC Pavement & Base Masonry Ret. Wall I keystone Wall 6" Private PVC Storm Drain Pipe 4" street sewer lateral (S -13) 1" Water Service 18" x 18" catch basin (brooks) 12"x12" pvt HDPE catch basin by'NDS' Private Trench Drain by NDS Gravelbags Stabilized construction entrance Silt fence 8" Fiber Roll Grasscrete CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOR ARDEN DRVE RESIDENCE GRADING PLAN CDP08 -084 CITY 9500 SF 100 CY 100 CY 468 SF 1400 SF 333 SF 773 SF 109 LF 1 EA 1 EA 2 EA 3 EA 1 EA 222 EA 600 SF 290 LF 47 LS 145 SF UNIT COST $0.45 $27.50 $20.00 $3.50 $5.00 $2.75 $1.00 $20.00 $1,335.00 $2,478.00 $250.00 $83.78 $2,637.00 $1.10 $5.25 $1.60 $2.25 $10.00 691-1[e] /_11111 10% CONTINGENCY TOTAL 121 1034 Second Street, Encinitas, CA 92024 .n Fn GTc�mnnnnn,mm�nn rnm PAGE 1 of 1 JOB NO. 08 -118 December 4, 2008 TOTAL 4,275.00 $2,750.00 $2,000.00 $1,638,00 $7,000.00 $915.75 $773.00 $2,180.00 $1,335.00 $2,478.00 $500.00 $251.34 $2,637.00 $244.20 $3,150.00 $464.00 $105.75 $1,450.00 $34,147.00 $3,414.70 $37,561.70 EQUITY TITLE COMPANY 2655 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, #301 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 PHONE: (619) 574.5985 FAX: (619) 294 -3298 DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 17, 2008 AT 7:30 A.M. WEST COAST ESCROW - ENCINITAS 740 GARDEN VIEW COURT SUITE 100 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 -5826 ATTENTION: DOREEN LANE YOUR NO.: EC -15821 PROPERTY ADDRESS: ARDEN , , CA ORDER NO.: SDO850363 TITLE OFFICER: MIKE R VALERI "PRELIMINARY REPORT" IN RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED APPLICATION FOR A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, EQUITY TITLE COMPANY HEREBY REPORTS THAT IT IS PREPARED TO ISSUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, A POLICY OR POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE DESCRIBING THE LAND AND THE ESTATE OR INTEREST THEREIN HEREINAFTER SET FORTH. INSURING AGAINST LOSS WHICH MAY BE SUSTAINED BY REASON OF ANY DEFECT, LIEN OR ENCUMBRANCE NOT SHOWN OR REFERRED TO AS AN EXCEPTION BELOW OR NOT EXCLUDED FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORMS. THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FROM THE COVERAGE OF SAID POLICY OR POLICIES ARE SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT B ATTACHED. THE POLICY TO BE ISSUED MAY CONTAIN AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE. WHEN THE AMOUNT OF INSURANCE IS LESS THAN THAT SET FORTH IN THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE, ALL ARBITRABLE MATTERS SHALL BE ARBITRATED AT THE OPTION OF EITHER THE COMPANY OR THE INSURED AS THE EXCLUSIVE REMEDY OF THE PARTIES. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS APPLICABLE TO THE CLTA AND ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE WHICH ESTABLISH A DEDUCTIBLE AMOUNT AND A MAXIMUM DOLLAR LIMIT OF LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN COVERAGES ARE SET FORTH IN THE POLICY, COPIES OF THE POLICY FORMS SHOULD BE READ. THEY ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OFFICE THAT ISSUED THIS REPORT. PLEASE READ THE EXCEPTIONS SHOWN OR REFERRED TO BELOW AND THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT B OF THIS REPORT CAREFULLY. THE EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS ARE MEANT TO PROVIDE YOU WITH NOTICE OF MATTERS WHICH ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE TERMS OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY AND SHOULD BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THIS PRELIMINARY REPORT IS NOT A WRITTEN REPRESENTATION AS TO THE CONDITION OF TITLE AND MAY NOT LIST ALL LIENS, DEFECTS AND ENCUMBRANCES AFFECTING TITLE TO THE LAND. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. THE FORM OF POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REPORT IS: (X] CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION /AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION HOMEOWNERS POLICY AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD POLICY AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL POLICY ORDER NO. SD0650363 SCHEDULE A THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: Uqi* TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: JEFFREY A REDLITZ AND BARBARA J REDLITZ, HUSBAND AND WIFE AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY WITH RIGHT OF SURVIVORSHIP THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO ORDER NO. SD0850363 EXHIBIT °A" THE NORTHERLY HALF OF LOT 15 IN BLOCK "E" OF ENCINITAS HIGHLANDS, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 2141, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. "`END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION- ORDER NO. SD0850363 SCHEDULE B AT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM DESIGNATED ON THE FACE PAGE OF THIS REPORT WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: A. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2008 -2009 TOTAL: FIRST INSTALLMENT: SECOND INSTALLMENT: ASSESSED VALUATION: LAND VALUE: IMPROVEMENTS: EXEMPTION: CODE AREA: A. P. NO.: $393.84 $196.92 PAID $196.92 PAID $35,865.00 $.00 $.00 19079 258- 233 -09 -00 B. SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES AND SUBSEQUENT DELINQUENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2008 -2009 ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. FIRST INSTALLMENT: SECOND INSTALLMENT RIl111141[i7 $266.40 PAID $266.40 PAID 879 - 114 -26 -07 C. SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES AND SUBSEQUENT DELINQUENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2008 - 2009 ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. FIRST INSTALLMENT: PENALTY: SECOND INSTALLMENT: PENALTY: BILL NO.: $3,323.92 OPEN $332.39 $3,323.92 OPEN $342.39 889 - 114 -25 -65 D. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WITH SECTION 75 OF THE CALIFORNIA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. E. ASSESSMENTS, IF ANY, FOR COMMUNITY FACILITY DISTRICTS AFFECTING SAID LAND WHICH MAY EXIST BY VIRTUE OF ASSESSMENT MAPS OR NOTICES FILED BY SAID DISTRICTS. 1. WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2. AN EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES STATED AND INCIDENTAL RIGHTS FOR: PIPE LINES, SUPPORTS AND MAINTENANCES GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGUITO IRRIGATION DISTRICT RECORDED: AUGUST 22, 1925 IN BOOK 1116, PAGE 182, OF DEEDS ORDER NO. SD0850363 AFFECTS: THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD 3. AN AGREEMENT TO ALLOW THE CROSS -ARMS OF WIRES AND POLES OR SIMILAR STRUCTURES TO BE PLACED ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY OF ALL HIGHWAYS OF LESS THAN SIXTY FEET IN WIDTH TO HANG OVER THE ABUTTING PROPERTY, AS ENDORSED ON MAP NO. 2141 HEREINAFTER MENTIONED. 4. THE FAILURE OF THE MAP ATTACHED TO THIS POLICY TO SHOW THE SAME LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF YOUR LAND AS THOSE SHOWN IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 5, AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY RECORDED: FEBRUARY 17, 1931 IN BOOK 1866, PAGE 147, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS: THE ROUTE THEREOF AFFECTS A PORTION OF SAID LAND AND IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT 6. AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PIPES, SEWER, WATER, AND GAS MAINS, POLES AND WIRES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RESERVED IN THE DOCUMENT. RESERVED BY: UNION TRUST COMPANY OF SAN DIEGO RECORDED: JANUARY 20, 1934 IN BOOK 269, PAGE 141, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS: THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS, BUT DELETING ANY COVENANT, CONDITION OR RESTRICTION INDICATING A PREFERENCE, LIMITATION OR DISCRIMINATION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, MARITAL STATUS, ANCESTRY, SOURCE OF INCOME OR DISABILITY, TO THE EXTENT SUCH COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTIONS VIOLATE TITLE 42, SECTION 3604(C), OF THE UNITED STATES CODES OR SECTION 12955 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE. LAWFUL RESTRICTIONS UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW ON THE AGE OF OCCUPANTS IN SENIOR HOUSING OR HOUSING FOR OLDER PERSONS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS RESTRICTIONS BASED ON FAMILIAL STATUS. RECORDED: JANUARY 20, 1934 IN BOOK 269, PAGE 141, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS "'END OF SCHEDULE B "' ORDER NO. SDO850363 NOTES: NOTE: NO POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE HAS BEEN ISSUED ON THIS PROPERTY WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS. THE BASIC RATE WILL APPLY WHEN A POLICY IS ISSUED UNDER THE ABOVE ORDER NUMBER. NOTE NO. 1: IF THIS COMPANY IS REQUESTED TO DISBURSE FUNDS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS TRANSACTION, ASSEMBLY BILL 512 (CHAPTER 598, STATUTES OF 1989) MANDATES HOLD PERIODS FOR CHECKS DEPOSITED TO ESCROW OR SUB - ESCROW ACCOUNTS. THE MANDATORY HOLD PERIOD FOR CASHIER'S CHECKS, CERTIFIED CHECKS AND TELLER'S CHECKS IS ONE BUSINESS DAY. OTHER CHECKS REQUIRE A HOLD PERIOD FROM THREE TO SEVEN BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE DAY DEPOSITED, THE PERSONS WHO ARE PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTION TO WHICH THIS TITLE INSURANCE POLICY RELATES (THE "PRINCIPALS ") EACH AGREE, UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT EQUITY TITLE COMPANY ( "EQUITY ") IS ALSO ACTING AS AN ESCROW HOLDER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS TRANSACTION AND IS NOT ACTING AS A TRUSTEE OR IN ANY OTHER FIDUCIARY CAPACITY. EQUITY'S DUTIES SHALL BE LIMITED TO SAFEKEEPING OF SUCH MONEY AND DOCUMENTS RECEIVED BY IT AS ESCROW HOLDER, AND FOR THE DISPOSITION OF SUCH MONEY AND DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS ACCEPTED BY IT AS AN ESCROW HOLDER. ALL FUNDS RECEIVED BY EQUITY AS ESCROW HOLDER SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO AN ACCOUNT (THE "ESCROW ACCOUNT ") WITH A STATE OR FEDERAL BANK (THE ,DEPOSITORY-). EQUITY MAY ALSO DEPOSIT ESCROW FUNDS FOR OTHER CUSTOMERS FOR UNRELATED TRANSACTIONS TO THE ESCROW ACCOUNT. UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED IN WRITING, EACH OF THE PRINCIPALS AGREES, UNDERSTANDS AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT: THE ESCROW ACCOUNT IS NON- INTEREST- BEARING; NO FINANCIAL OR OTHER BENEFITS WILL BE EARNED BY OR PROVIDED TO ANY OF THE PRINCIPALS WITH RESPECT TO SUCH FUNDS; AND EQUITY AND ITS AFFILIATES MAY INSTEAD RECEIVE DIRECT AND INDIRECT FINANCIAL AND OTHER BENEFITS FROM THE DEPOSITORY WITH RESPECT TO SUCH FUNDS. THESE BENEFITS SHALL BE TREATED AS ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION TO EQUITY FOR ITS SERVICES AS AN ESCROW HOLDER IN THIS TRANSACTION. ONLY CASH OR WIRED FUNDS CAN BE GIVEN IMMEDIATE AVAILABILITY UPON DEPOSIT. ALL OTHER FUNDS SUCH AS PERSONAL, CORPORATE OR PARTNERSHIP CHECKS AND DRAFTS MAY CAUSE MATERIAL DELAYS IN DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS ON THIS ORDER. IN ORDER TO AVOID DELAYS, ALL FUNDS SHOULD BE WIRE TRANSFERRED. OUTGOING WIRE TRANSFERS WILL NOT BE AUTHORIZED UNTIL CONFIRMATION OF THE RESPECTIVE INCOMING WIRE TRANSFER OR AVAILABILITY OF DEPOSITED CHECKS. NOTE: THIS COMPANY DOES REQUIRE CURRENT BENEFICIARY DEMANDS PRIOR TO CLOSING. IF THE DEMAND IS EXPIRED AND A CURRENT DEMAND CANNOT BE OBTAINED, OUR REQUIREMENTS WILL BE AS FOLLOWS: A. IF THIS COMPANY ACCEPTS A VERBAL UPDATE ON THE DEMAND, WE WILL HOLD AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO ONE MONTHLY MORTGAGE PAYMENT PLUS INTEREST. THIS HOLD WILL BE UP AND ABOVE THE VERBAL HOLD THE LENDER MAY HAVE STIPULATED. B. IF THIS COMPANY CANNOT OBTAIN A VERBAL UPDATE ON THE DEMAND, WE WILL HOLD TOTAL PROCEEDS UNTIL A CURRENT DEMAND IS RECEIVED. ORDER NO. SD0850363 NOTE: IF YOU INTEND TO WIRE FUNDS TO EQUITY TITLE COMPANY, PLEASE CALL OUR OFFICE AND SEND THE FUNDS TO: COMERICA BANK 2321 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 500 El Segundo, CA 90245 ACCOUNT #1891614867 ABA ROUTING #121137522 PLEASE REFERENCE OUR ORDER NUMBER SD0850363 AND THE TITLE OFFICER MIKE R VALERI. I c a C 1 d 0 ORDER NO. SD0850363 5 d 4 I� i 4 j 3 f a 1, ONF SW "W U SO %21x.]1 ._ — IaF'�(r <1vnN LLy b.w IbnwY TP 2IX IUM:a wmr L s b a� 9 5 4 3 F E a g %5 5c a 0 J (•n c•�a ;V.D ► (t� fn R4 t9 ,J t,1! Fta �cU �ti CD A �- fz� �� f•rr •� > C ma = d 0 ORDER NO. SD0850363 5 d 4 I� i 4 j 3 f a 1, ONF SW "W U SO %21x.]1 ._ — IaF'�(r <1vnN LLy b.w IbnwY TP 2IX IUM:a wmr L s b a� 9 5 4 3 F E a g %5 5c a 0 J EQUITY TITLE COMPANY PRIVACY POLICY We are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information — particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and companies involved in real estate services, such as home warranty companies. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you Confldentlallty and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to help ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. G -L -B Privacy Policy! #47 EXHIBIT B LIST OF PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (By Policy Type) 1. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY -1990 SCHEDULER EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does nor insure against lose or damage (and the Company will not pay cost. attorneys lees or expenses) which Anse by reason of. I Taxes or assessments Mich are not shown as tWbng liana by the records of any becomg authority that bvros Nxas or esMaemorms an nor property or by the public nwNS. Prccaleam, by a public agency whim may disull in taxes M asmns nt, Of np6Le of such proceedings. whether To not shown by Nee RCdds d such agency W by has public record.. 2 My facts, nghd interests or claims xT M are not shown by Me public records but which could be asfenained by an inspection of the land W which may be asserted by persons in possession here& 1 Easement. liens or encumbrances. or dams thereof. which are not shown by the public raw We a. Discrepancies. conflicts In boundary lines, shortage in was anwachments, or any char facts which a correct survey wall disclose . and wh¢hh aro not known by Me pubic mcoms. 5. (a) Unaalened mining claims; (b) diddh edam$ or ezcepbons in patents soon Acts auhoriring the Issuance artifact. (d wear rigMS, claims or file I. water, whither cur noI the matters excepted under fa), (b), Or (c) en shown by the Public mica ds. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The allowing, matters en expamly excluded from the coverage of his policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, coal., attorneys' fees or expanses Mil area by reason of 1. (a) My law ordinance or governmental regulation including but not limited to bulling and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) reshcbng, regulating, prohibiting or relating to ('q has OCOrpa ^CY. use or enjoymem of The lard, (id Me character dimensions or location of any impr000 mein now or heraaher erected an the land. (m) a separation In Owners ip or a la an IM dimeneons or area of the land or any parcel of which the land re w "a a pad. or (iv) amiimndirki protection, or the afford of any vmlation of these laws, ordinances Or governmental regulators, except to Me extent that a notice of enforcement Thereof Or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a donation or alleged .idetion affecting Me lard has been recorded in the public records 61 Date of Policy N) My govemmeman police power not excluded by (el above except to the extend that a notice of Ile exeroce hereof or a notice of a defect Inn or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged videlon affecting the land rtes been recorded in the public records al Data of Palmy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded In Me public records at Dale of Policy. but not excluding from Coverage any taking which has Occurred poor to Date of Policy Mich would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value wriout knowledge. 3. Defect. Ilona, encumbrances, adverse c end,, or other matters. (a1 Mathef or hot recorded in Me Public records at Data of Policy, but created, suffered assumed or agreed or by Me insured claimant. (b) not known t0 the Company, not headed in the public words at Dale of Policy, but known to The insured dalment ail MI disclosed in writing to Me Company by the insured Gallant prior to Me dole IM insured daimant became an insured under this policy. (c) hodkor, g in do loss or damage to he Insured claimanl, (d) staling of created subsequent to Date of Policy: or ho haulbng in loss or damage vol ..To rot have bean sustamord if the Insured claimant had paid value for Me Insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by the po4q 6. Umnforceebllity of Me lien of ins insured mortgage because of the Inability or failure of the Insured at Dale of Policy. or The Inability or failure of any subsequent owner of Me Indebtedness, To comply *in the liMlicabe' doing business, lam Of the stale in which the nand Is situated. 5. Invelidiry or unenfameabldy of he lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof. which arreen out of the Transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is hosed upon usury or any consumer uedrl protection or truth in landing law. 6. My claim, hell apses out of the transaction vesting or the insured the estate or Interest Insured by her policy or the transaction creating Me interest of The n$ured lerhder, by hason of Me operation of federal bankruptcy, state Msdi ency or simmer cadllors rights laws. 3. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1993 WITH A.L.T,A ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are a doodidy excluded from Me provide, of this poly and the Company will not pay lass or damage cost, adomerys fees Or expenses Mil an" by reason of I (at My law, ordinance Or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and Zoning law$. ordinances, or regulations) reaMctng, regulating, proluddi ng or relating to (g gt ocdrpancy. use or enjoyment of he land, (if) Me character, dimensions or location of any improvement or. or hereof ed erected on he land -, (rri) a separation In ownership or a change in the dimension. or area of the land of any parcel of Mich the land Is or was a part; or (iv) andmomental protection, or The ailed of any violollon of These laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice, of the enforcement thereof or a hol ice of a defect. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation w alleged violation elfecung the land has been decoded M the public recode at Data of Pot, (b) My governmental polio power rut excluded by tar atom, eaceof to the ..rant het a notice of the axerdes Memo( or a notice of a defect. lien or encumbrance heultry Irons a violation or alleged vrotalion affording the land has been recorded in the public records at Data of Pollry. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the axe=$& thereof has been recorded In Me public records at Data at Policy, but not excluding from Coverage any taking which has assumed prise b Dab of Pdiq whit mould be binding on he rights of a purchaser for value will knowledge. 1 Dafif hand, encumbrances, adverse daims, ad oMet malted: (a) crafted. sugded. assumed or agreed to by Me insured claimant (b) not Mown to Me Company, not mwrded In Me public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and nor ddrodho id in writing to the Company by the Inemad delmant pole to the date the Insured dam ent became insured under this policy: (c) rasutnnpm no hiss or damage to the insured darmant. (d) allachmg or neared subseruent to Dare of Poly ( except to Me extent Mat this polity Insures the priority of he lien of he insured mortgage over any sedutay ben for services. s o or materiel Of Me extent maura0ce is afforded heard as to assessments for street Improvements under construction Or Compared at data of policy). or (a) dooduting In loss or damage will would not have been sustained if the insured Qaimarn had paid value for the insured mortgage a. Unenforceablity, or the lien of the insured mortgage because of Me mablldy or failure Of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the Inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the Inde redness. To comply won apolcade'dang business laws Of the stare In whim me tend is. .fueled. 5. Invenlhly or unanfocezbrnity of Me lien of he insured mortgage. a claim thereof, Mil arises Out of Me nameadion evidenced by the insured mortgage add is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection on fiuh In lending law S. My fal lOry led for services, labor or malerlide (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for serobe4 labor or materials over Me lien of the insured mortgage) fitting from an Improvement or wool retired to the lend Mil is contacted of and commenced subsequent to Dale of Policy and Is not financed In whole or In pad by proceeds of the Indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage Mich at Date d Policy Me insured has advanced Or is obligated to advance. T My obim. which anses out of Me Moraction creating Me Interest of the mortgagee neural by he poky, by reason of he ope ation o radial bankrul stale msdwrnry, w firmer craddono oghre two a is based on (if the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer. or (b) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of Me application of the doctrine of equitable subordination or (rif Me Transaction creating the modest of die insured mortgagee berg deemed a preferential transfer except where The ohehnbal transfer skulls Irons he felt.. (a) to timety record the rrstrumenl of transfers or (b) of such recordation t0 import notice to a Purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor 3. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When Me Amencen Land Mss Aaaccrerron Pad, Is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy. the exclusions set foM In perforator 6 above are used and Me fortiori eacephich, to coverage apps., in the policy SCHEDULER This poll, does not maure agars) loss or damage (and the Company will nod pay cost. attorneys fees or expenses) which am.. by reason of I Texas or neMVmen is which are not shown as exisWg liens by the records of any lazing eumproy that levies taxes or assessments on real pmpeny or by The public mica. 2. My fact, right. interests, or claims whim are nor shown by the public records but which could be saddened by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry Of persons in possession hereof. 3 Easements. Jaime of easement or encumbrances which am not shown by The public records. 6 Discrepancies, conflict in boundary lines, shortage In area, encroachments, or any other facts which a Correct survey To disclose. and which am not shown by the public records. 5. Unpalenled mining daims, reservations or exceprions in parents or In Ads authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or life to water. 6 My lien . w right to a lien. fix services, labor or material Martial or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and rot shown by he public records. a. AMERICAN LAND Tri ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY -1992 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following mattads m ..pm sy excluded from the coverage of Ions prowl and the Company will not pay loss or damage. costs, e110meys tees Ore expenses which anse by reason of 1 (a) My law, ordinance or governmental degulalion (including but nor limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, Or regulations) msmi ton, regulating. qunibiin, Or amth, 10 (iI Me .,n,, use, Or enjoyment of the land, (ii) Me china le4 dimensions or location of any Improvement now or hereafter erected on Me land'. (iii) a separation In ownership or a change in Me dimensions or area al the (and or any prowl of which the land is or was a pan, or (iv) environmental pmudipn. or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or Vvemmsntal regulations, eeeeDt ter The egent Nat a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation Or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded In Me public mrards at Date of Policy (b) My governmental pW ce power not excluded! by (a) above. except to IM extent that a noble of Na exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a v'loebw or arrayed violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Flights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded In Me public records at Data of Policy. but nor excluding from coverage any taking whiUi has occurred prior to Dale of Policy which would he binding on the rights Of 8 WICha ral for value without knowledge. 3, Defech, liens, BnNmbrempas adverse Claims. Or other matter. (a) created suffered, assumed or agreed 1. by Me insured claimant. tb) ro1 known to Ine CcmDany. nor T Wrded In Me public records at Dale of Policy. but known to the insured Claimant and not dptlose0 in venting to Me Company by the Insured Claimant pna to Ine data the Insured Gelman became insured under Ole policy. (of assimg In no loss or damage to Me insured Claimant, (d) allaching a created subsequent to Data of Policy: or (a) resulting In loss or damage which would not have been sustained If the Insured claimant had paid value for the estate or Interest Insured by this policy. a. My claim, which anses out of the transaction vesting in the Insured estate or Interest Insured by this policy. by reason of Me Operation of federal bankruptcy, stale insolvency, or similar credrtars' i laws, Met is based on (it Na Transaction creating the estate or interest Insured by this Policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent Transfer. or IQ the transaction creating the liable or Interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failma. (a) to timely record the.h."Manl of transfer: or (b) of such room aeon to m pan notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor S. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY -1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When Me Nnencan Land 718e Association pbtcy Is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and nor as an Extended Coverage Policy The exclusions set forth In paragraph 6 above are us" and Me following exceptions to coverage appear In Me poltry. SCHEDULE This poll" does nor insure against loss or damage (and Th. Company will not pay coats. allomep fees or expenses) which anse by reason of Pan One 1 Taxes or assessmenb which are not shown as existing liens by the reonds of any lazing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by Me publi: records. 2. My facts rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the pubbo records but which could be ascedened by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of pera0he in posssaskn dlereof. 3. Easement, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by pubic records. e. Discrepancies, controls In boundary lines, shortage In area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are nod shown by the public records. 5. Unpatenled mining claims. reservations Or exceptions in patents or In Acts armorwrlg the issuance thaROtl water rights, claims Or title t0 water. 6. My lien, or right to a lien, for Services, labor Or material ther0tofore Or Thermal Nmished, Imposed by law and nor shown by the public records. 6. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY - 1987 EXCLUSIONS In addition to exceptions In Schedule B, you are nor insured against loss, cost, attorneys' fees and expenses resulting from. 1. Govemmenlal police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This Includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concemdrg . land use land division Improvements on the land environmental Droral This exclusion does nor apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters wfilU appear In Me Dutcho records at Porky Dale. This excil does not limn the rating covens, described In items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks 2. The right to Take the end by Condemning II, unless . e notice of exercising the Tight appears in the public rewMS on the Policy Dale Me Taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you n you bought The land without knowing of the raking. 3. Tips Risks. Nat are created, allowed or agreed to by you that are known To you, but nor to us. On The Policy Date - unless May appeared in Me pubic records Nat It in no lose to you Net Find affect your 8da after Me Policy Dale this does not limit IN labor and material ben overage In Item 8 of Govern! Title Rieke a. Failure to pay value for your tide. 5. Lack of a nphil to any end outside the melt specifically described and rafened to In Item 3 of Schedule A, or In sb66l. alleys, or waterways Met Touch your land This exclusion does rot limit The access Co%e age in Item 5 of Covered Toe Risks T. CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE -2003 Ali HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE -2003 Covered Risks A (Subdivision Law V erif. ). 15 (Building Palmier, 16 (Zoning) and 18 (Encroachment of boundary wee. or fences) are subject to Deductible Amount and Maximum Dollar Limit of LiaElliy EXCLUSIONS In addition to the exceptions In Schedule B, you are not Insured against Ions, costs, alficho a fees, and expenses resulting from 1. Governmental police power, and the inoster¢e or violation Of any law or government regulation. This Includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and mguladons concerning: (a) bueang (b) Toying (c) tend use. Id) improvement on the lard (e) land division (D environmental prom i0n. This excluskn does w1 apply to octal ons or Me enforcement of Mesa dollars which appear In the public records at Policy Dale. This explosion does nor limit the coverage described In Covered Risk 14 15. 16. 17 u 24 . 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any pan Of them, to be Construcled in accordance with applicable Wilding bodes. This Exclusion does nor apply to vblaWns of building cords drillable of the volifia o appears in The Public Records at IN Policy Date. 3 The mi 1. Take Me land by condemning id, unless: (a) a notice of axercleing the fight appears In the public records on The Polity Date, Or (b) the Taking happened before the Policy Dale and is binding on You if You bought TN lard without Knowing of IN taking. e Roks: (a) Net are chmad, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they appear In The Public Records. for Net are Known to You at the Polcy Dale, but not 0 Us, uNess they appear In Me Public Records at the Policy Dale: (C) Mel rewn m no loss to You: or (d) Nat first occur after Me Policy Dole - This does not limit the overage described m Covered Risk 7, 8.0. 22.23, 2a or 25. 5 Failure to pay value for your Tide. 6. Lack of a right. at to any Land outside the area specir -caly described and reined to In paragraph 3 of Schedule A', and (bf in streets, alleys or waterways MITI touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described In Covered Risk 11 or (6. 6. ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (1011L,1) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The follovnng matters are grompl fy excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys fees or expenses whim ante by reason of I (a) My law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and room, laws. oNinarucks, ch regulations) restrici regulating, p-ohioiting or wleting 1. (0 Me cowpancy. use or enjoyment M Me Lend, (k) the character . dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter eected on the Lend. (iii) a separation in Ownership or a chant In the dimensions u• areas of the Land or any parcel of which the Land m or was a pad . or rv) environmental protection, or the affect of any violation of Mesa lawn. ordnance. or governmental wguletions. except 10 Me extent that a notice of the shipment Ihermf or a notice of a defect lien or encumbrance resulting from a violabod or alleged violation effecting the Land has been recorded in Me Pudic Record. al Data of Policy This exclusion ripe. rat Lion the coverage provided! under Covered Risks 12. t3, 14 , and 16 of this pony, (b) Any goMmmenlal pdiu power not excluded by (al above, except to the extent that a MOw of Me exerase thereof w a not,. of a defect, lam or encumbrance roWrying from a vagglu n or alleged violation alledmg the Land has been worded In the Public Records it Date d Pdiry. This exclusion does nor limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of Mla policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless nodi of the axerose thereof has been recorded In the PUbdO Records at Data of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any Isking Mdch has owned pip to Dale M Policy which would be binding on Me fights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge 3. Defects, Ii..., B ournaboal odvenB claims or Other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant, (b) rq Knowin to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Polley, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed In writing M Me Company by Me Insured! Claimant poor M Me date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this polity, (c) resulting In ro Idea or damage 10 the Insured Claimant, (d) affecting Or created subsequent to Date of Policy (big paragraph does sal limn the coverage provided under Coveretl Risks 6, 16, 18. 19. 20. 21. 22, 23, 24, 25 and 266 or (e) resulting m Ines Or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceabllily of the Ilan of Me Insured Mortgage because of the Inability or failure of the Insured al Date of Policy, or the mablity or failure of any subsequent owner of Me indebtedness, to comply -M apolki do,, business laws of the state in which the Land a situated. 5. Invalidity or unedforaabllity of Me lien of Me Insured Mortgage, or claim thereof, which amts out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage add is heaad upon ust ry, exc.pl as Provided in Covered Risk 22, Of any consumer credit protection or Man in binding law. 6. Real properly teas. or assessment. of any governmental authority which become a lien on the Land subsequent to Data of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks T, file) and 26 T. MY claim of invalidity menforceabildy or lack of priority of the who of Me Insured Mortgage es to advances or modifications made after the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A . no forger Me owner .1 the ..let. or interest covered by this policy. This Indiction does not limit the coverage Provided in Covered Risk 6. 8. Lac of priority of the lien of Me Insured Mortgage as to each and every advance made after 0.1. of Pdiry, eM all interest charged thereon, over Irons. encumbrances and qmr marten affecting Me tide, Me existence of which era Known to Me Inured al. (a) The Ilma of the advance', or (b) The time a modification Is made to IM lenng Of Me Insured Mortgage which changes the rate of Interest charged, if Me rare of Interest is greater as a result of Me modification Man It would have been belle the modification This exclusion does not limit the Coverage provided in Covered Risk 8. 9. TIm filature of Me residential structure. or any portion thereof to have been constructed before, on or after Dale of Paltry In accordance with apphi builtling codes. This exclusion does not gi to violations of building odes d notice of the violation stickers in Me Public Records at Dale of Policy 9. 2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (061 746) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following madam am expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company *11 not pay lass or damage, toes, attorneys fees, or expanses that arm. by reason of T (a) Any law, chillness. Permit, or governmental regulation (including those misting to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiling, or relating to (II) the occupancy, use. or emoyme t of the Land. (ii) the character, Mmmabns, or location of any Improvement erected on the Land. (di) the subdivision of Land, m environmental prowlion or the effect Of any hurl of these laws, Ordinances or gowemmehta regulations. This Exclusion I(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Rid T or 8. 3. Defects. Item, encumbrances downing claims, or other matters (a) created, suckled, assumed, or agreed 10 by the Insured Claimant. (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded In the Public Records at Data Of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in waiting to the Company, by Me Insured Claimant prior to the data the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy. (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Cleman, (d) edachirg or tousled subsmuera Io Data of policy (however. MI. does not modify Or lin it en coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14). or (e lresuning in loss or damage Mal woud not have been sustained d Me Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insued Mortgage 4. Unenforcaebley of Me lien of Me Insured Mortgage because of the inabtity or failure of an Insured to comply vnM applicable doing-busiriess laws of Me smote where Me Land is situated. 5. Invalidity Or unamoraabildy in whole or in pan of the lien of Me Insured Mortgage that am.. our of the transaction lowdenced by the Insured Mortgage and Is based upon usury or any consumer cadc Protection or vulh.h- lending Iew 6. My claim, by masm of the clortim of federal bankmplry, state insolvency, or lumber aedrtws right. Iowa, Mat Me transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, Is (a) a freudulerll conveyance Or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a piefearmal transfer for any reason not stated M Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy . Any lien m the Tide for reel estate laze. or assessments Imposed by governmental authority add created or eltaching between Date of Policy and the dale of recording of Me Insured Mortgage In Me Pudic Records. This Exclusion does not modify or Lmn the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11 lot 10, 2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (061746) MATH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Assoaallon policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and nol as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 8 above are used and the following exceptions to ovewga apoem in the pi SCHEDULED This oxi does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will nor pay costs, attorneys fees or expenses) which arise by reason of Pad One I . Taxes or assessment& wr i are not shown as Blostng Ilene by the records of any taking auMpmly, that I.Vles taxes or assessments on heal properly or by the pUb11L words, 2. Any fats, fights . interests or claim. which are not shown by Me public records but which hind he asimmu d by an inspection of sad land or by making Inquiry of pasons in possession Hereof. 3. Easements. Gaing of easement or encumbrances which are nor shown by public words. 4. Discrepancies. conflots In boundary lines, flooding. In area, mordechmen6, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose and which am not shown by the pudk records. 5. Unpalenlm mining claims', reservations or exceptions In patents on In Acts aulhdru ing Me Issuance thereof, water right., claims or title to water. 6. Any Iwo w right to a Iron, for services labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, 11, 2006 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (0617.06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following mmew are expressly excuded Irom the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, Or expanded that arise by reason of 1. (a) Any few, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including These relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, pmhibidng, or relating to (1) Ma occupancy, use, or Impymml of Me Land. (ii) Me character, dimensions or location of any improvement erected on Me Land, (III) ale suMiwsion of land, Or (w) environmental cooled.. or the effect of any rotation of Mesa laws. ordinances. or govemmenMl regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit Me coverage provided under Covered Rid 5. (b) Any govemmental polio power This Exclusion 1(b) aces not modify on limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6 2 Rights of eminent domain. This Excursion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 2 or 8, 3. Defects, (lens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other madam (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant. Ili) not Knorm to Me Company, not worded in He Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in wdtln, to the Company by the Input C4imanl pip b the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy. (c) obutbng In rq loss or damage to the Insured Claimant, (d) enacting or created sub.srol to Data of ponry (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10), or (a) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained it me Insured Claimant had paid valor for the Tine. 0. My daim, by reason Of the operation of federal bankruptcy. state Insolvency, or sunder crediare rights laws, mat the VansaNOn vesgng the Tine as shown in Scra le A, is la) a fraudulent Conveyance or fraudulent transfer. or (b) a peferentlel transfer for any reason not sell in Covered Rmk 9 of the polity. Any lien on the Title for real smale taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the dale of recording of the dead or other instrument of Vanefer in the Public Records that vent. Title as shown in Small A. 12. 2006 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (064 7-06) WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the Armenian Land Tine Associabon policy is used as a SlandaN Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions sal forth In paragraph 9 above are used and the followng excel to coverage appear in the poll" SCHEDULED This porky dons net insure against lees or damage (and the Company will not pay eats. attorneys fees or ..penes) which ens. by reason of. Pad One'. I. Texas or Bsaessomps wl .re not shown as existing mom by the records of any axing authority that avie6taxes or assessments on real property Or by the public records. 2. Any facts . rights, interests. or claims whiU are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an Inspection of said lend or by making In Wiry of persons in possessuch 1hemW 1. Easements, claims of aaament or ehbumbranxs whet am not shown by public records. a. Disaepsnoes. oonelce in boundary liras, shortage in area, enwachmems, or any other facts which a cormal survey would disd., and which em not shown by the publk records. 5. Unpalented mining claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or In Acts aothoriiiag the Issuance thereof, water ril calms or tine to water. 6. Any lien, or dgh, to a lien, for somas. labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and nol shown by the public records. DCC # 2008 - 0272819 .. IIIIIIIIII�IVIIIVIIIIII�IIIIIVIII VIIIIIIiIVIIIIIIIII�IIIIIII IIII MAY 21, 2008 8:00 AM OFFICIALRECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER ' FEES: 77140 OC: OC PAGES: 1111110111 Hill 111111111111111111111111 oil 1111 l l l ! 11111111 1 111111 GRANT DEED THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTORS) DECLARE(S) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS $752.40 CITY TRANSFER TAX IS $.00 [ X j computed on full value of property conveyed, or 0 computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale. 0 unincorporated area [ X ] City of Encinitas AND FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Sherry Paris, a married woman as her sole and separate property hereby GRANT(S) to JEFFREY A. REDLITZ AND BARBARA J. REDLITZ, HUSBAND AND RIFF. AS CONNUNITY PROPERTY WITH RII� OF SURVIVORSHIP the ollowing described real property in the County of San Diego, State of California: The Northerly half of Lot 15 In Block "E" of Encinitas Highlands, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California according to Map thereof No. 2141 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego, State of California. Dated: March 21 2008 STATE OF CA�LIFQrjNIA RECORDING REQUESTED er ' EQUITY TITLE - SAN DIEGO AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: y1i Jaffrey Redlitz and Barbara Redlitz I V/ 4431 Heritage Glen Lane U San Dlego, CA 92130 —r1-� Order No- SD0850363 Escrow No.: EC- 15821 -0K 111111 A.P.N.: 258 - 233-0900 DCC # 2008 - 0272819 .. IIIIIIIIII�IVIIIVIIIIII�IIIIIVIII VIIIIIIiIVIIIIIIIII�IIIIIII IIII MAY 21, 2008 8:00 AM OFFICIALRECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER ' FEES: 77140 OC: OC PAGES: 1111110111 Hill 111111111111111111111111 oil 1111 l l l ! 11111111 1 111111 GRANT DEED THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTORS) DECLARE(S) DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS $752.40 CITY TRANSFER TAX IS $.00 [ X j computed on full value of property conveyed, or 0 computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale. 0 unincorporated area [ X ] City of Encinitas AND FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Sherry Paris, a married woman as her sole and separate property hereby GRANT(S) to JEFFREY A. REDLITZ AND BARBARA J. REDLITZ, HUSBAND AND RIFF. AS CONNUNITY PROPERTY WITH RII� OF SURVIVORSHIP the ollowing described real property in the County of San Diego, State of California: The Northerly half of Lot 15 In Block "E" of Encinitas Highlands, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California according to Map thereof No. 2141 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego, State of California. Dated: March 21 2008 STATE OF CA�LIFQrjNIA COUNTY OF _ t anAf- On y1i me of Notary Public, perso �vr✓u - ly a peared �zr..� who proved to me on the bas's of sap sfactory evidence to be 01e person(p) whose nam4&X51&e subscribed to the YAlhin instrument and acknowledged to me that hl they executed the same in hQ6�>h•�eeir authorized capacity(looand that by hind- olhetr stgnalure(sd'on the instrument the person(e1 or the entity upon behalf of which the persoj (W, acted, executed the instrument. 1 SS. Sherry Paris l i !7��- OCT 2 2 7008 I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the Slate of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. MONICA GOMEZ SONILLA Ndaty Publk•Callfomis WITNESS my and an fficial L paANGE County Cranndasl8[rA 1308917 rn Signa re My Comm Ex0res August 20,2008 [ Signa re of tary A Commission xpiration Date: (This area for official notarial seal) MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: Jeffrey Redlitz and Barbara RedlitZ, 4431 Heritage Glen Lane , San Diego, CA 92130 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: TRUDY RAY MAKKEWICH 3354 ALSEDO ST. 11ACIENDA HEIGHTS, CA 91744 lasaa Uz stsaBLnRLb to sass an aaoval 1407 DOC 1993 - 0507965 OS —AUG -1993 11 :33 AM OFFICIAL P.ECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE ANN£TTF FOAMS. COUNTY RECDROER RF: 3.00 FEES. 5. 00 AF: 1.00 OC PFt 1.00 QUITCLJ M DEED TRUST TRANSFER (Excluded faun Reappraisal Under Propwition 13, i.e., Calif. Const. Art 13A§1 et. seq.) The undersigned quitc•atrac (s) declare(s) under pens" of perjury that the following Is true and Correct. THFBE IS NO CONSIDERATION FOR THO TRANSFER. THIS IS A CHANGE IN FORMAL TITLE ONLY. See Notes /1 and #2 below. Documentary transfer tax is NONE. These is no transfer tax due. Note #I: Conveyance transferring QDitelohneen inntesvat bolo a revoaowk Lying trust. This conveyance transfers Quilclaimer's interest into her revocable living taut which is not pursuant to a sale and is exempt pursuant to Rev. & Tax Code Section 11911 - NOTE 02: (s) Is the same pet'on(sl as Trustee(a). This Conveyance is to a revocable trust and pursuant to Rev. & Tax Code Section 62(d)(2), does = constitute a change of ownership and does = subject the property to reassessment - FOR NO CONSIDERATION, TRUDY K. MARKEWICH, a married Wonsan, as ha sole and seperate property, the undersigned quitclaimer(s). hereby REMISE(S), RELEASE(S) AND QUIT'CUMNI(b7 TO: TRUDY I— MARKEWICA, TRUSTEE OF THE TRUDY K. MARKEWICH FAMILY TRUST DATED Z-3;-31-'1 , the following described real property in the County of San Diego, State of California: The northerly half of Lot 15 in Block 'E' of Encinitas o Hio_ ti_lands, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 2141, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California. Assessor's Parcel No- 258 233 09 00- More commonly described as: 0000 Arden Dr, Encinitas �HHiighla nds � , TRUD e- .. A C STATE OF C r,�, ) COUNTyO�lv_� e Oe that day or C 19�Y. befog me. J,e urdenig„eA. o N.xaey PLb6e in u hr .aid 9xte. pmnt+lll apparad�K. M dt :� Ptansaay 1/to. to u,e — of p- pterad b me on the bate or rlhAmry evidence w be the p n(z) witooe oamtp) u wbL nil d to dw vnLhin i,tstrtmmt and eckeowktdaed b me Nu the exa._ • a me in ho, mp ci4y. •nd that by her zip tunes) on the ittYru.ntnt the penon(x), or the why upon hel. f or which the pteao,t(a) a.". asoedod the i- � sV[fIVESS sir Yattd ad o1Gea1 deal. nrrrrrnt ru /'�� h (tesyn �, sTenstlW. /4lLLlfplt t. 4. rn Nttlary INffic CAPACr Y CLMMED BY SIGNEMS): 0 INDWIDUAL t l CORPORATE OPRCERS (clue) : PARTNER(!) I 1 ArMRNEY-IN -FAR 1 1 TRUSIE&S) r- GUARDIAN/COr4sMvATlM U CyliM, N i, WE Samao Engineering. Inc. Land Planning, Civil Engineering, Surveying, Mapping s n( DRAINAGE STUDY ITWI CDP 0 &084 REDLITZ RESIDENCE ARDEN DRIVE, ENCINITAS, CA 92024 F-,_-j0W.& ' Lei:: O 1�L October 23, 2008 Job No.08 -118 1034 Second Street ♦ Encinitas, CA 92024 ♦ phone: 760 - 436 -0660 ♦ fax: 760-436-0659 info usampoengineering com N I Samao Enaineerinz, Inc. w —�e Land Planning, Civil Engineering. Surveying, Mapping 1 Job No. 08 -118 s 1023/08 DRAINAGE STUDY FOR: CDP 08 -084, Redlitz Residence - Arden Drive Encinitas, CA 92024, APN: 258- 299 -09 Criteria: 1. Use the current County of San Diego Hydrology Manual "Rational Method ". 2. Design for a 100 -year frequency storm using the County of San Diego 6 hour and 24 hour precipitation isopluvials. 3. Runoff coefficients are based on soil type "D ". "C" factors have been weighted based on the individual "C" factors for different surfaces (i.e. concrete= 0.95), and the areas of the individual surfaces. 4. Times of concentration (Tc) are determined from the urban overland flow formula. 5. Refer to the attached drainage map for basin areas and locations. Introduction: I . The subject property is 0.22 gross acres and is located on the easterly side of Arden Drive. The property is currently undeveloped.The property ascends to Arden Drive at an approximate grade of 8 percent to the westerly limit of the subject property. The neighboring property drains directly to the west onto Arden Drive. This project proposes to maintain the historical drainage patterns. 2. The project proposes to construct a single family residence. The project will include dettached garages, flatwork, retaining walls, and planter areas. On site driveway is to be constructed porous pavement to reduce impervious surface area and use as BMP. Grass -lined swales are to be constructed on the south side of property for post- construction BMP purposes. The post - developed nmoff from the property is approximately 0.58 cfs. The pre- developed runoff is approximately 0.42 cfs, an increase of 0.16 cfs 1034 Second Street ♦ Encinitas, CA 92024 ♦ phone: 760436 -0660 ♦ fax: 760 436 -0659 info@sampoengineering.com a c 0 n E wV co i nW CO c d c ZW oc W J W H .doh ao.08- ill 071)i2-o W,5 �ISTI� �?PsI, ,A' L "L, sT -t* c OW eVT pfO�.t'f TFt Pri-PbeY yc2 o D�- Af,rk : 157 D S IUD cIP o l i) 14-111y °I , 2 III v m a c 0 a E W U co i n � m c d c zw It w J 0 W Q N AfFC-A .222 � SF - O, 05 A Co. SP6) + 3,44 10,I r) zzzy -0 Z) 1�51f' G) 3 C1.9) 5.2l -0'6 9, 5,84 1ti /vrfL T o. 62 ( cj ,54)C o's) ,� - ©, It cps F n E W V ao i r d rn c ci z E It W J H O W f, M, �As, �-t � V- 2 .A &cA - 12 5 sF - O, o2a A-c. z5) } 55�(o•�IS� 125 i 1,g C I .l - o•cq (,) zo�h 1,. �.g W, Z iw = I. 4a � 2,��',Q� -0,6¢5 T� : 11 2 3 i� /fm �l� CAA a 0 a E w 0 �U CO i M 0 z W J W N R..0 PKI AD.7 ;F = o, 14 A� 4415 Cony) iGJ�l ( 0,15) c, . 0, 44 (III - ©- 4¢) o,G�S �k� - CIA a C O N Q a wV CO i n m M d cn c z oc W J H 0 W H Ln ot Pl ef, 4 n" L@ so coil 6y P?,opEfTj w *k pm-, 2 4 i�pAsI� 3 Is VTIkeTT) � G ID ti -Z4" Y, 24., OeTC�- P� ' ��= phsi� �D2 4- h! 46, 3 (QT ®II + o'Zq — 0.40 eV 6 OT off, ooil oI f> D 0 c F� noo i o,o,► }C' = 0, DSb2 ON ; O-21 a 0 a E W O r U CO i cf) a) Ocm C Z W W J W IQ-- N Mo A = Ca J z ,��gCo.��2 A =o. o3 40 Q O. 03 cM a cu 0 CL E wV �t M m N d c Z W W J 0 W N ri bfc-Te v2L,,l,ac*e 4c 0.5$) 110-y- 1,4 i D,64 110 ; s of J�IK 0,5t(Ibl��olu, 1�10 = a,13 �% (0, IS) a c 0 CL E W O ;Di P- d M d rn .� O C Z W F, cc W J 0 w H N PI/C See tff -51jc , G �3 Clp$ � 2 o, �� g l ��13 ( b, D� \ J 4b % � " A'I ULA 6" A a c 0 _m o. E W U CO i M a� zw w 0 w tn R, IµfjLlI�bjI oti' piDF,I Qty a' - 0, +s Ao l 'c' f 019/ fl 'C - G,II a� • 14 vtj, = h S� 2,')) C o u) 224 x = q 100 R W LL W U z Q f- N O W V) Lu W Q EXAMPLE: Given: Watercourse Distance (D) = 70 Feet Slope (s) =1.3% Runoff Coefficient (C) = 0.41 Overland Flow Time (T) = 9.5 Minutes SOURCE: Airport Drainage, Federal Aviation Administration, 1965 T =1.6(1.1 -C)VD 3V Rational Formula - Overland Time of Flow Nomograph r tA 10 z z W F- O Z Uj W O F I G U R E 3m3 FA EXAMPLE: Given: Watercourse Distance (D) = 70 Feet Slope (s) =1.3% Runoff Coefficient (C) = 0.41 Overland Flow Time (T) = 9.5 Minutes SOURCE: Airport Drainage, Federal Aviation Administration, 1965 T =1.6(1.1 -C)VD 3V Rational Formula - Overland Time of Flow Nomograph r tA 10 z z W F- O Z Uj W O F I G U R E 3m3 NRCS Elements Undisturbed Natural Terrain Low Low Low Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential High Density Residential Commercial/Industrial Commercial/Industrial Commercial/Industrial Commercial/Industrial Table 3 -1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR URBAN AREAS Land Use I Runoff Coefficient "C" Soil Type County Elements I% IMPER. A B C D Permanent Open Space Residential, 1.0 DU /A or less Residential, 2.0 DU /A or less Residential, 2.9 DU /A or less Residential, 4.3 DU /A or less Residential, 7.3 DU /A or less Residential, 10.9 DU /A or less Residential, 14.5 DU /A or less Residential, 24.0 DU /A or less Residential, 43.0 DU /A or less Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional/Commercial Limited Industrial 0• 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 10 0.27 0.32 0.36 0.41 20 0.34 0.38 0.42 0.46 25 0.38 0.41 0.45 0.49 30 0.41 0.45 0.48 0.52 40 0.48 0.51 0.54 0.57 45 0.52 0.54 0.57 0.60 50 0.55 0.58 0.60 0.63 65 0.66 0.67 0.69 0.71 80 0.76 0.77 0.78 0.79 80 0.76 0.77 0.78 0.79 85 0.80 0.80 0.81 0.82 90 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.85 90 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.85 95 0.87 0.87 0.87 .087 *The values associated with 00% impervious may be used for direct calculation of the nmoff coefficient as described in Section 3.1.2 (representing the pervious runoff coefficient, Cp, for the soil type), or for areas that will remain undisturbed in perpetuity. Justification must be given that the area will remain natural forever (e.g., the area is located in Cleveland National Forest). DU /A = dwelling units per acre NRCS = National Resources Conservation Service 2 u San Diego County Hydrology Manual Date: June 2003 Section: 3 Page: 12 of 26 Note that the Initial Time of Concentration should be reflective of the general land -use at the upstream end of a drainage basin. A single lot with an area of two or less acres does not have a significant effect w�ere the drainage basin area is 20 to 600 acres. Table 3 -2 provides limits of the length (Maximum Length (LM)) of sheet flow to be used in hydrology studies. Initial T; values based on average C values for the Land Use Element are also included. These values can be used in planning and design applications as described below. Exceptions may be approved by the "Regulating Agency" when submitted with a, detailed study. Table 3 -2 MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH (LM) & INITIAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION M) Element* DU/ Acre .5% 1% 2% 3% 5% 10% LM T; LM T; LM T; LM T; LM I T; LM Ti Natural 50 13.2 70 12.5 85 10.9 100 103 100 8.7 100 6.9 LDR 1 50 12.2 70 11.5 85 10.0 100 9.5 100 8.0 100 6.4 LDR 2 50 11.3 70 10.5 85 9.2 100 8.8 100 7.4 100 5.8 LDR 2.9 50 10.7 70 10.0 85 8.8 95 8.1 100 7.0 100 5.6 MDR 4.3 50 10.2 70 9.61 80 1 8.1 1 95 7.8 100 6.7 100 5.3 MDR 7.3 50 9.2 65 8.4 80 7.4 95 7.0 1001 6.0 1 100 4.8 MDR 10.9 50 8.7 65 7.9 80 1 6.9 90 6.4 100 1 5.7 100 4.5 MDR 14.5 50 8.2 65 7.4 80 6.5 90 6.0 100 5.4 100 4.3 HDR 24 50 6.7 65 6.1 75 5.1 90 4.9 95 4.3 100 3.5 HDR 43 50 5.3 65 4.7 75 4.0 85 3.8 95 3.4 100 2.7 N. Com 50 5.3 60 4.5 75 4.0 85 3.8 95 3.4 100 2.7 G. Com 50 4.7 60 4.1 75 3.6 1 85 3.4 90 2.9 1 100 2.4 O.P. /Com 50 4.2 60 3.7 70 3.1 80 2.9 90 2.6 1 100j 2.2 Limited I. 50 4.2 60 3.7 70 3.1 80 2.9 90 2.61 100 2.2 General I. 50 3.7 60 3.2 70 2.7 80 2.6 90 2.3 1 1001 1.9 *See Table 3 -1 for more detailed description 3 -12 7 -94 HANDBOOK OF HYDRAULICS Table 7 -13. Values of K for Circular Channels in the Formula Q n D75a14 D - dayth of Ater d - Jiv malvr of vhnim el Table 7 -14. Values of K' for Circular Channels in the Formula Q - K dlisi+ n D - d.pth of w4tvr d - dl4 motor of eea5 oal 'y tl i t ... I 7 -35 STEADY Urf"Ol"I F7.p1V IV O1'EN CHANNELS Table 7 -4, For Determining the Area a of the Crom Section of A Circular Conduit Flolving ]'Art Full de,Ih of we6or D And C. - he mbulntod value. Than a - C.dI. IAt dicme"r of ehonnel d FR . I .06 I 07 I 08 I 00 ,00 I OI . I I I .0 ,00 .0013 .0037 .0060 .0103 .0147 ,0107 .0 z.. .v.+ - - -- .1 .0+00 .0470 .05.11 .0000 .0008 .0739 .0811 .0685 .0001 .7 070 ,1 .111 .IIU9 .'llal .1100 .1419 .16.1 .,62.1 .1711 .1600 .1890 .3 All .7074 .2107 .22(g) .2.355 �l460 254r .1047 .27.10 .1MlA - �1 ,2034 .10.12 .1130 .1220 .3725 .3499 .3577 .7017 .7717 .7817 .5 .301 .401 .413 .423 .433 .443 .457 .401 .472 .182 6 .402 .502 .612 .611 .536 .640 .650 .580 .660 .678 .T .667• .600 .601 .014 .093 .032 .040- .640 .067 .006 ,8 ,07+ .081 .060 .007 701 712 .710 .]16 ]37 .716 ,9 I .745 ]50 716 .70 .700 .l]1 .176 .770 .762 .784 -- Table 7 -5. For Determining the Hydraulic Radius r of the Cross Section of a Circular Conduit FIO,ing Part Full Imnh nr ram. D 1 (:. _ tlm mFnlnmd vnhin. Tlwn . - C.d. Ict . in.ne m� afn5 �hnnn vl - a one dl .00 I .Ol I .02 I .03 I .04 I .os Fee I .07 I .06 .09 0 .000 .007 .013 1 .063 .070 .076 2 .121 .120 .131 3 .171 .176 .180 .4 .214 .218 .222 .6 .250 .253 .256 0 .276 .180 .262 .7 200 2015 .209 e .3 D1 .104 201 . ,p .201 .109 .204 020 081 130 186 220 ,259 .284 .300 ..104 209 020 OB7 142 189 229 262 .280 .701 304 .2so 013 .039 .016 .061 . 116 073 .099 .104 .110 .116 147 .162 .167 .101 .760 ,177 .198 201 .213 .247 .237 .230 .2+0 .205 .208 .270 .273 .278 .288 .290 .202 .271 .2204 .102 .102 .2207 .304 .101 .107 .302 .lot .20: .715o 21.7 .270 .274 .201 1 i m rh m County of San Diego - 33 °30' Orange - Hydrology Manual County, _ !a'. _- -_ - -- -- 33 °30' a , Riverside County kr" - -3 4 ' b it ' �� ''. `•. . . Rainfalllsopluvials 33 °15 i-- --- -- 100 Year Rainfall Event - 6 Hours acEwstoE R� }. s— Isopluvial (inches) ........... ' \'? 1.... - - C) ENCMRAS -a 1 33 °00' stx wq _ +! r s.a couNN. _ ------------ - 33 °00' Oa ,- CD CO .i i - 1 � 3 ^ • , 4 32 °45' nJ _ -- _ w DPW yT % ,' SD 3.5 b 1 �� GIS n I q • kjsvRv�ow Wu Hti�n lho Ci,.crcd '. .,. -•�_, , Q. ,•••_•• • ; '. - _.. _ .— N MB WP6PNOVO®M11IXrt wNOM1lIY OF NIYIIM.Em9tF%MESs IM (�• :_ J• i :. _.- or �uoiwnxnr NO flilE65 iCH�PNmWMPIMJZE. owy�6H R.N MOY Rr wG -- _ lVt e�... wr°�iemasunH; 32 °30' o zo - 32 °30' S 3 0 3 Miles o i' L Lo ZD County of San Diego . Orange �— Hydrology Manual County _: pr . -,N - — 33 °30' -- — — — Q, Riverside County Tom., '••.•°•o. -.; ..,'' � - - - - - _ o -.._ 'Ot 70 `£o Rainfall Isopluvials . x a- o r 0 .� r `- � •- ___. _. __ ._- -33 °15 -- - 100 Year Rainfall Event - 24 Hours 0 OCEANSIOE11 • r _ f .• ti •- O Isoplwial (inches) -- --° - S. b d�ps€ ... 0 ENCINRhS'.'� ' = _ ; :�..'. • . �; 33'00 n SOLANAa r 3 powAy 33 °00' : s U qbl1NTY -- -------- O DEL O .6�. _ i '� - --- - - °• � ,�a CD CD Ea4`3 _ °45' I . ' .. 32 .' ......... _ �s1 S SD ' 0g Q GIS SanGIS " (�• R rccm \Cc Haw San Diup (s L' 6fg •.mot �' © _ _ •' _ _- - _ __ _._. -- "- N msr,arPr>ruco wnnwr wwwNnvar eNrmo. an.�oslw oa iuwID. rtuuna. arr xor wRm ro. ilE wEO wNauMnH . � . • . � • _ - .ice ipp p YFAOMNfIBUiY NO fRIC$iORA PMIKVI1N1 P1I60£. Cugp.Mpa.N 1pb wrwa IMPERLAL v_ G X� v TMwes.rmrn ea�u.wwo ww. W G MY�PmY1md8Nlptl 32 °30' ,n.vma..rw+.n urm�rm r°ati°�+Pmaaa.wn 32 °30' S 3 0 3 Miles m ;D i f I p N ,.;r i„ BA-SlNx NU 1 w�, Ale *l 1- U Z AC C" 0 67 � a MOUR i j, I I TOO 6 l9 cf5/ PEA. -4, r \ F �a• �� NILk nN �� h MEW V11,11 1 11 Apk/tlTl AR C r -[' \ ±Rf. T�: �F'�\ xN� � F: ° �1 N/ l nBASIIV H;r, , t, �4 ��I N q r I �/ [ tS�EC 13 flo 7 J IN /HR n h d yi is i lli FE 1580 No. -- jl en I 6 04 - 'n>�A� -l�ti3 t x n Jd�K�s . d� h �4I 11 HR r 029 FS oo � �r o ` 55 = c„ IOT FO "o', rrnu 'r - s a Y 1/Z GJf 15 —� MAP 2 id J � I , u SHEET 2 POST — DEVELOPED CONDITION ONIAWE MAP FOR ARDEN DRIVE RESIDENCE APN 259- 2i3 -09 a f �CJ�CT I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APN -258- 233 —�7 -00 I I I I I I I I PPROPOSED 6 — ', kN000 FE�CE I I I I I I i I i I I I I I I Iii f I ,7m:' \I E� II IN Lt 6" PVC INV ='62.00 I APN- 258 - 23'3— OB —OOIi RIP R PER 0 -40 TYPICAL1 I I 1 I TREES TOPE REMOYYeeD — _ I PROPS TY — N i APN - 2501233 —O9 , I A t sHE ,Fr 3 OfF 9I7e e--IAsn✓