Loading...
2011-10799 GLine: 6 3 130 3S-6 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 10799 GI PARCEL NO. : 256- 242 -5700 PLAN NO.: 10799G JOB SITE ADDRESS: 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE CASE NO.: 10170 / CDP APPLICANT NAME HOANG KOVARIK MAILING ADDRESS: 1428 BELLA AZUL COURT PHONE NO.: 760 - 635 -9137 CITY: ENCINITAS STATE: CA ZIP: 92024- CONTRACTOR : LICENSE NO.: ENGINEER PERMIT ISSUE PERMIT EXP. INSPECTOR: N DON SANFORD/ WESTERN PACIFIC HOMES 840212 CIVIL CONSULTING GROUP DATE: 7/01/11 DATE: 2/11/12 PERMIT ISSUED ICK DEILE ----- - - - - -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS INC. PHONE.NO.: 760 - 685 -1816 LICENSE TYPE: A PHONE 858- 565 -0475 BY: 1. PERMIT FEE .00 2. GIS MAP FEE .00 3. INSPECTION FEE 1,880.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 5. NPDES INSPT FEE 376.00 6. SECURITY DEPOSIT 37,601.00 7. FLOOD CONTROL FE 1,300.00 8. TRAFFIC FEE .00 9. IN -LIEU UNDERGRN .00 10.IN -LIEU IMPROVMT .00 11.PLAN CHECK FEE .00 12.PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 --- ---------------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------- -------- --- ------- -- - - -- PERMIT TO GUARANTEE BOTH PERFORMANCE AND LABOR /MATERIALS FOR EARTHWORK, DRAINAGE, PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS AND EROSION CONTROL PER APPROVED PLAN. CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN TRAFFIC CONTROL PER APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN OR PER W.A.T.C.H. STANDARDS. LETTER DATED JUNE 27, 2011 APPLIES. - - -- INSPECTION --- ------- - - - - -- DATE -- - - -- -- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION 1 1 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. TURE 11 DATE SIGNED I)L)IN) 5 &1'Oi_7f) 7710 - 63 S ' l 8Ito PRINT NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3. OTHER EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD SUITE I SANTEE CALIFORNIA 92071 619 258 -7901 fax 619 258 -7902 Don & Cari Sanford 696 Poinsettia Park South Encinitas, California 92024 Subject: Grading Plan, Foundation Plan and Details Review Proposed Single - Family Residence and Accessory Unit 820 Orpheus Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 May 23, 2011 Project No. 10- 1147114 Reference: "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Single- Family Residence and Accessory Unit, 820 Orpheus Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 ", Project No. 10- 1147134, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated November 10, 2010. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Sanford: In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the grading plan, foundation plan and details prepared by Michael McCall, Civil Consulting Group of San Diego, California for the proposed single - family residence and accessory unit at the subject site. The grading plan, foundation plan and details were found to be in substantial conformance with the recommendations provided in the referenced geotechnical report. Our firm should observe the foundation excavations for proper size and embedment into competent bearing soils. If we can be of finther assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. U S. No. CE 2701 Mamadou Saliou Diallo, P.E. RCE 54071, GE 2704 MSD1md EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 (619)258 -7901 Fax 258 -7902 Don & Cari Sanford 696 Poinsettia Park South Encinitas, California 92024 Subject: Report of Field Density Tests Proposed Single - Family Residence and Accessory Unit 820 Orpheus Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 July 22, 2011 Project No. 10- 1147B4 Reference: "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Single- Family Residence and Accessory Unit, 820 Orpheus Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 ", Project No. 10- 1147B4, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated November 10, 2010. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Sanford: This is to present the results of field density tests performed on the building pads for the proposed single - family residence and accessory unit at the subject site. In accordance with your request, in -place field density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D1556 (Sand Cone Method). Grading was conducted between June 30 and July 18, 2011 under the observation and testing of a representitive of East County Soil Consultation & Engineering Inc. The results of the field density tests are presented on Page T -I under "Table of Test Results ". The laboratory determinations of the maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill soils are set forth on Page L -1 under "Laboratory Test Results'. The approximate test locations are shown on Plate No. 1. Following clearing and grubbing, i.e. the removal of vegetation and rubbles from the demolition of the existing house, subgrade soils were overexcavated to depths up to approximately 3 feet below existing grade into the dense terrace deposits. Prior to the placement of new fill, the bottom of the excavation was scarified to a depth of approximately 6 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted. On -site and imported fill soils consisting of silty sand were placed in thin lifts, moisture conditioned around optimum and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. DON & CARI SANFORD, 810 ORPNEUS A VENUE, E'NCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10-1147B4 Compaction was achieved with the use of a Caterpillar 410 backhoe and a fully loaded dump truck. Based on our field observations and density test results, it is our opinion that the grading operation for the proposed residential project was performed in accordance with the referenced geotechnical report and local grading ordinances. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Pages T -1, L -1 and Plate No. 1 are attached. Respectfully Submitted, ' No. GE 270" E. r, Mamadou Saliou Diallo, P.E. RCE 54071, GE 2704 MSDJmd DON & CAN SANFORD, 810 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO 10- 1147B4 PAGE T -1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS ASTM D1556 FG = FINISH GRADE 3 REMARKS MAXIMUM DEPTH FIELD DRY DRY TEST SOIL OF FILL MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY PERCENT NO. TYPE IN FEET %DRY WT. P.C.F. P.C.F COMPACTION 1 1 2 9.7 125.2 134.0 93 2 1 2 6.6 129.7 134.0 97 3 2 2 6.8 110.7 123.0 90 4 2 2 6.7 110.7 123.0 90 5 2 1.5 7.9 116.5 123.0 95 6 1 2 8.2 130.8 134.0 98 7 l 2 8.1 128.6 134.0 96 8 1 2 7.4 126.3 134.0 94 9 1 2 7.9 130.8 134.0 98 10 1 2 10.7 127.9 134.0 95 11 1 2 8.5 120.5 134.0 90 12 1 3 8.7 130.9 134.0 98 13 3 3 7.9 118.8 132.0 90 14 3 2 7.3 119.7 132.0 91 15 3 2 10.2 125.0 132.0 95 16 1 1.5 10.6 130.1 134.0 97 17 2 4 FG 9.8 113.5 123.0 92 18 2 4 FG 7.6 110.2 123.0 90 19 1 4 FG 6.9 126.5 134.0 94 20 1 4 FG 6.9 125.8 134.0 94 21 1 4 FG 5.8 127.1 134.0 95 22 1 4 FG 9.2 121.8 134.0 91 23 11 4 FG 6.1 127.9 132.0 97 24 3 4 FG 8.7 124.0 132.0 94 FG = FINISH GRADE 3 REMARKS ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 16 " /%<D City �f Capitol Improvement Projects �/�� District support Services /v Encinitas Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering OUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. O y G71" I h0lel) Ak_e Name of Project �2�1,/ rte Name of Developpeer^� po" Ltr7VFLTtLtq Site vA d O Location rZD :laddies.mr ... weet. name. :.c;. ?.•.;,-: -...„ :..: r... suffix) :a_atj. . , M g ... ,_ ...: 'J have inspected the gra nq,atthes bjectsite andr ve ied'itertifcation3of the pad by'':' .:•rte is ;: •;:3a. the1riginea � rof Work, r , . , dated: gnd certification of ". .soil'''- compaction by the soil Engineer, dated -;r J:am hereby, satisfied: hat the..rough. grading has been comp! ed:'in:ac rdance:witW.- the:approvetl °: :r;"f 1?.•r plans ;.,2nd- specifications, Chapter. 23:2A-of -the ;Municipal code,`and,:any-bther appllcatrle': engirreering standards and specific project requirements Based :on my observation and the certifications,.I take no.exception to the: issuance .ofa:: t building permit for the lotlsl as noted or.Phase If any, but only in so far as grading Is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availabllity, any other public Improvements, deferred monumentationi or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and Irrigation) haj been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. J w �D e � 1 (signature of Engineering Inspector) -L_ � (Date) (Signature of SeniorGwl Engineer, only it appropiate) - fOateJ Reference: Building Permit No. — Special Note. Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in aecurity, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. JSG /field3.docl TEL 760-633 -2600 / FAX 760.63 3-2627 505 S. Vol= Avenue, Encinias. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760533 -2700 11� recj sled paper Civil Consulting Group, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS July 25, 2011 Attention: City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Subject: Engineer's Pad Certification for Gradine Permit Number 10799 -G Pursuant to section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for the project at 820 Orpheus Avenue. As Engineer of Record for the subject property, I hereby state all rough grading for this project has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes, and Standards. 23.24.3 10 (B) The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Per plan: field measurement: Level 6: accessory unit; main house and patio 150.00 149.93 Level 5: accessory unit garage pad 151.00 151.06 Level 4: Main house garage pad 156.50 156.44 Level 3: Main house master retreat 158.00 158.03 Level 2: Main house master suite 159.50 159.41 Level 1: Main house living area 161.25 161.28 23.24.3 10 (B) 1: Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan 23.24.3 10 (B)5. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.3 10 (B)6. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. Best Regards, Michael McCall RCE 53444 5858 Mount Alifan Drive, Suite 233, San Diego, CA 92111 Tel: 858 565 0475 — Fax: 858.565 0478 www.civilconsultinginc.com EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 (619)258 -7901 Fax 258 -7902 Don & Cari Sanford 696 Poinsettia Park South Encinitas, California 92024 Subject: Report of Field Density Tests Proposed Single - Family Residence and Accessory Unit 820 Orpheus Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 July 22, 2011 Project No. 10- 1147134 Reference: "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Single - Family Residence and Accessory Unit, 820 Orpheus Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 ", Project No. 10-1147134, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated November 10, 2010. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Sanford: This is to present the results of field density tests performed on the building pads for the proposed single - family residence and accessory unit at the subject site. In accordance with your request, in -place field density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D1556 (Sand Cone Method). Grading was conducted between June 30 and July 18, 2011 under the observation and testing of a representitive of East County Soil Consultation & Engineering Inc. The results of the field density tests are presented on Page T -1 under "Table of Test Results ". The laboratory determinations of the maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill soils are set forth on Page L -1 under "Laboratory Test Results ". The approximate test locations are shown on Plate No. 1. Following clearing and grubbing, i.e. the removal of vegetation and rubbles from the demolition of the existing house, subgrade soils were overexcavated to depths up to approximately 3 feet below existing grade into the dense terrace deposits. Prior to the placement of new fill, the bottom of the excavation was scarified to a depth of approximately 6 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted. On -site and imported fill soils consisting of silty sand were placed in thin lifts, moisture conditioned around optimum and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. DON & CARI SANFORD, 820 OPPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 114784 Compaction was achieved with the use of a Caterpillar 410 backhoe and a fully loaded dump truck. Based on our field observations and density test results, it is our opinion that the grading operation for the proposed residential project was performed in accordance with the referenced geotechnical report and local grading ordinances. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Pages T -1, L -1 and Plate No. 1 are attached. Respectfully Submitted, No. GE 2701 Exp:u -.%,x -k% J t"�-�TF CAl.1FOP \I`t, Mamadou Saliou Diallo, P.E. RCE 54071, GE 2704 MSD /md 2 DON & CAR[ SANFORD, 810 ORPHEUSAVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10-1147B4 PAGE T -1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS ASTM D1556 FG = FINISH GRADE 7 REMARKS MAXIMUM DEPTH FIELD DRY DRY TEST SOIL OF FILL MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY PERCENT NO. TYPE IN FEET %DRY WT. P.C.F. P.C.F COMPACTION 1 1 2 9.7 125.2 134.0 93 2 1 2 6.6 129.7 134.0 97 3 2 2 6.8 110.7 123.0 90 4 2 2 6.7 110.7 123.0 90 5 2 1.5 7.9 116.5 123.0 95 6 1 2 8.2 130.8 134.0 98 7 1 2 8.1 128.6 134.0 96 8 1 2 7.4 126.3 134.0 94 9 1 2 7.9 130.8 134.0 98 10 1 2 10.7 127.9 134.0 95 11 1 2 8.5 120.5 134.0 90 12 1 3 8.7 130.9 134.0 98 13 3 3 7.9 118.8 132.0 90 14 3 2 7.3 119.7 132.0 91 15 3 2 10.2 125.0 132.0 95 16 1 1.5 10.6 130.1 134.0 97 17 2 4 FG 9.8 113.5 123.0 92 18 2 4 FG 7.6 110.2 123.0 90 19 1 4 FG 6.9 126.5 134.0 94 20 1 4 FG 6.9 125.8 134.0 94 21 1 4 FG 5.8 127.1 134.0 95 22 1 4 FG 9.2 121.8 134.0 91 23 3 4 FG 6.1 127.9 132.0 97 24 3 4 FG 8.7 124.0 132.0 94 FG = FINISH GRADE 7 REMARKS DON & CAR[ SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 1147B4 PAGE L-1 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS RESULTS OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill materials as determined by ASTM D1557, Procedures A and B which use 25 blows of a 10 -pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 4 -inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot compaction cylinder and Procedure C which uses 56 blows of a 10 -pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 6 -inch diameter 1/13.3 cubic foot compaction cylinder are presented as follows: OPTIMUM MAXIMUM MOISTURE SOIL TYPE/ DRY DENSITY CONTENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION LB/ CU. FT. % DRY WT. I/A DARK BROWN SILTY SAND 134.0 7.6 2/A TAN BROWN SILTY SAND 123.0 9.5 (IMPORT) 3/A REDDISH BROWN SILTY SAND 132.0 8.5 lo• I a I I I soa I I �• I� 1A Is I � I I �® — I I I EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION & ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTUY RD.. SUITE 1. SANM CA 92071 (619) 258 -7901 Fax (619) 258.7902 104-t1*70v off- Z)g5'2W11 -y 7E0;7=5 Pav f GAPlzwep D Pzo o1?�f/E .P►L�iVGfE �vciN /7�s iaCq/�y- M iO— / /f7PS� �sPTE Nv. / EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "1" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 (619) 258 -7901 Fax 258 -7902 Don & Cari Sanford 696 Poinsettia Park South Encinitas, California 92024 Subject: Limited Geotechnicai Investigation Proposed Single- Family Residence and Accessory Unit 820 Orpheus Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Sanford: November 10, 2010 Project No. 10- 1147134 In accordance with your request, we have performed a limited geotechnical investigation at the subject site to discuss the geotechnical aspects of the project and provide recommendations for the proposed development. Our investigation has found that the proposed building pads are underlain by fill and topsoil to depths ranging from approximately 2 to 6 feet below existing grade. Dense sandstone of the Terrace Deposits and Torrey Sandstone Formations was underlying these soils to the explored depth of 55 feet. It is our opinion that the proposed development is geotechnically feasible provided the recommendations herein are implemented in the design and construction. Should you have any questions with regard to the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully S. ` Na GE 2704 E: P: [ L•b t- It v- I - Mamadou Saliou Diallo, P.E. RCE 54071, GE 2704 MSD\md DON & CARI SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 1147B4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION....................................................... _ ....... . .................................................................. _... ...... j SCOPEOF SERVICES._ ..................................................................._.__................_... ...__...._........_._......._.3 SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ......_._....._...»._....._ ....... .................._...._......3 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ................ .................................. ............ _ ...... 4 GEOLOGY........................................ ..._...._..___.........._ ....__....- ... ..... ........... GeologicSetting .......................................................... ............................... SiteStrat igraphy ..................... .. ........................................ _....................... SEISMICITY.............................. _.................... Regional Seismicity ............................. Seismic Analysis .. ............................... 2007 CBC Seismic Design Criteria.... Geologic Hazard Assessment ............. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Compressible Soils .............. Expansive Soils .................... Groundwater ........................ 7 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................... _ ..... ..... ...................... ............ 7 GRADINGAND EARTHWORK ................ ........ ........ .................. ............................................................... 8 Clearingand Grubbing .............................. .......... .._ .................................................. _ ... __._ ... .. ....... 8 8 Structural Improvement of Soils ..... ............... ................. ........... ....... ......_ ............. _._ ........................ 9 Transitions Between Cut and Fill .................................... _ ........................................... .. ...................... Method and Criteria of Compaction ._........_..._........_._ ....... .......... ..._ ............................ _ ... _ ... .......... 9 ErosionControl ................................................. .......... .._ ........ ........ ...... ... ............... _ ...................... 9 StandardGrading Guidelines .........................................................................._...... ............._................9 FOUNDATIONSAND SLABS ........ ........... .. ...... ..... ............. ........... _ ..... ................. .. .................................. 9 SETTLEMENT............................................ .. ............... ...... .......................................................... ............. ... 10 PRESATURATION OF SLAB SUBGRADE ........ _ .......................................................... _ ... .... __.............. to TEMPORARYSLOPES ....................................... _._ .... .... ... _ ....... ._ ............................................ _ ............ 10 PERMANENTSLOPES .................................. ......... ......... _... ... ... .................. ..... ..... ... ............................ 10 RETAININGWALLS ........................................... _ ....... ... ................................. .......... . .................................. 11 CONCRETE PAVEMENT ............... _ ................................................................................ _ ........................... 12 TRENCH BACKFII. L ..... ... ...................... ...... _ ... ...... ... ...... ..... ...................... _ ........................................... 12 DRAI NAGE ........................................................... _ ......... ................................ ...................... .. ..................... 12 FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW ............. ..................... ................... .... .................... .. ............ ..................... 13 LO&TATIONS OF INVESTIGATION ................... .. .... .......... _.... _....._ ..._._... _....._.__.........__..._....13 ADDITIONALSERVICES ............................................................................................. ........_........_...........13 PLATES Plate 1- Location of Exploratory Boreholes Plate 2 - Summary Sheet (Exploration Borehole Logs) Plate 3 - USCS Soil Classification Chad PAGE L -1, LABORATORY TEST RESULTS .................. ... ............._........................ .._........_...._............16 REFERENCES........................................................................_....._..._......_................... ...._........_..._...........17 DON & CARI SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 1147B4 I►T13ST1111w Y (a1►1 This is to present the findings and conclusions of a limited geotechnical investigation for the proposed one and two -story, single - family residence and accessory unit to be located at 820 Orpheus Avenue, in the City of Encinitas, California. The objectives of the investigation were to evaluate the existing soils conditions and provide recommendations for the proposed development. SCOPE OF SERVICES The following services were provided during this investigation: O Site reconnaissance and review of published geologic, seismological and geotechnical reports and maps pertinent to the project area O Subsurface exploration consisting of four (4) boreholes and one seepage pit within the limits of the proposed area of development. The boreholes and seepage pit were logged by our Staff Geologist. O Collection of representative soil samples at selected depths. The obtained samples were sealed in moisture- resistant containers and transported to the laboratory for subsequent analysis- 0 Laboratory testing of samples representative of the types of soils encountered during the field investigation O Geologic and engineering analysis of the field and laboratory data, which provided the basis for our conclusions and recommendations O Production of this report, which summarizes the results of the above analysis and presents our findings and recommendations for the proposed development SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The subject site is a rectangular- shaped residential lot located on the west side of Orpheus Avenue, in the City of Encinitas, California. The property, which encompasses an area of 18,000 square feet (300' x 60) includes a one -story house and slopes moderately to the west Vegetation consisted of a few trees, grass and shrub. Site boundaries include Orpheus Avenue to the east and residential parcels to the remaining directions. The Site Plan prepared by MBR Designs of La Costa, California indicates that the proposed construction will include a single - family residence and an accessory unit. The structures will be one and two -story, wood -framed and founded on continuous footings with slab -on -grade floors. Associated improvements will include a concrete driveway, concrete patios, a retaining wall, paved parking areas, landscaping and other appurtenances. It is our understanding the building pads will include 7 levels or terraces stepping down to the west to reduce the quantity of fill. DON & CAR/ SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS A VENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 114784 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING On October 27 and 28, 2010, four (4) boreholes were drilled to a maximum depth of approximately 6 feet below existing grade with a hand auger. In addition, a seepage pit was drilled to a depth of 55 feet utilizing a truck mounted drill rig with a 48 -inch bucket auger. The approximate locations of the boreholes are shown on the attached Plate No. 1, entitled "Location of Exploratory Boreholes ". A continuous log of the soils encountered was recorded at the time of drilling and is shown on Plate No. 2 entitled "Summary Sheet ". The soils were visually and texturally classified according to the filed identification procedures set forth on the attached Plate No. 3 entitled "USCS Soil Classification'. Following the field exploration, laboratory testing was performed to evaluate the pertinent engineering properties of the foundation materials. The laboratory- testing program included moisture and density, maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, particle size analysis and expansion index tests. These tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM standards and other accepted methods. Page L -1 and Plate No. 2 provide a summary of the laboratory test results. GEOLOGY Geoloeic Setting The subject site is located within the southern portion of what is known as the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of California. The geologic map pertaining to the area indicates that the site is underlain by Pleistocene marine terrace deposits (Qt). Site Stratigraohy The subsurface descriptions provided are interpreted from conditions exposed during the field investigation and/or inferred from the geologic literature. Detailed descriptions of the subsurface materials encountered during the field investigation are presented on the exploration logs provided on Plate No. 2. The following paragraphs provide general descriptions of the encountered soil types. Fill Fill soils were observed in the existing building pad in Boreholes No. 1 and 3 to depths of approximately 6 inches and 4 feet respectively below existing grade. They consisted of dark brown silty sand that was damp to moist and loose in consistency. Topsoil Topsoil is the surficial soil material that mantles the ground, usually containing roots and other organic materials, which supports vegetation. Topsoil was observed in all boreholes with a thickness ranging from approximately 1.5 to 2.5 feet and consisted of dark brown, silty sand that was moist, loose and porous in consistency and some organics (roots and rootlets). 4 DON & CARI SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 114784 Marine Terrace Deposits (Qt) Terrace deposits were observed below the topsoil layer. They generally consisted of tan to reddish brown, silty sand that was moist and dense in consistency. Torrey Sandstone (TO Torrey Sandstone was encountered in Borehole No. 4 (seepage pit) at a depth of approximately 45 feet It consisted of light tan, poorly graded sand with silt that was moist and dense in consistency. SEISMICITY Reeional Seismici Generally, Seismicity within California can be attributed to the regional tectonic movement taking place along the San Andreas Fault Zone, which includes the San Andreas Fault and most parallel and subparallel faults within the state. The portion of southern California where the subject site is located is considered seismically active. Seismic hazards are attributed to groundshaking from earthquake events along nearby or more distant Quaternary faults. The primary factors in evaluating the effect an earthquake has on a site are the magnitude of the event, the distance from the epicenter to the site and the near surface soil profile. According to the Fault - Rupture Hazard Zones Act of 1994 (revised Alquist- Priolo Special Studies Zones Act), quaternary faults have been classified as "active" faults, which show apparent surface rupture during the last 11,000 years (i.e., Holocene time). "Potentially- active" faults are those faults with evidence of displacing Quaternary sediments between 11,000 to 16,000 years old. Seismic Analysis Base on our evaluation, the closest known "active" fault is the Rose Canyon Fault located approximately 3 miles (5 kilometers) to the west. The Rose Canyon Fault is the design fault of the project due to the predicted credible fault magnitude and ground acceleration. The Seismicity of the site was evaluated utilizing deterministic methods (Egseach/ Eqfault ver 3.0, Blake, 2008) for active Quaternary faults within the regional vicinity. The site may be subjected to a Maximum Probable Earthquake of 6.9 Magnitude along the Rose Canyon fault, with a corresponding Peak Ground Acceleration of 0.51g. The maximum Probable Earthquake is defined as the maximum earthquake that is considered likely to occur within a 100 -year time period. The effective ground acceleration at the site is associated with the part of significant ground motion, which contains repetitive strong - energy shaking, and which may produce structural deformation. As such, the effective or "free field" ground acceleration is referred to as the Repeatable High Ground Acceleration (RHGA). It has been determined by Ploessel and Slosson (1974) that the RHGA is approximately equal to 65 percent of the Peak Ground Acceleration for 5 DON & CAR! SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 114784 earthquakes occurring within 20 miles of a site. Based on the above, the calculated Credible RJiGA at the site is 0.338. 2007 CBC Seismic Desi¢n Criteria A review of the active fault maps pertaining to the site indicates the existence of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone approximately 5 km to the west. Ground shaking from this fault or one of the major active faults in the region is the most likely happening to affect the site. With respect to this hazard, the site is comparable to others in the general area. The proposed residential structures should be designed in accordance with seismic design requirements of the 2007 California Building Code or the Structural Engineers Association of California using the following seismic design parameters: PARAMETER VALUE 2007 CBC REFERENCE Site Class D Table 1613.5.2 Mapped Spectral Acceleration For Short Periods, S, 1.351 Figure 1613.5(3) Mapped Spectral Acceleration For a 1- Second Period, S, 0.507 Figure 1613.5(4) Site Coefficient, F. 1.0 Table 1613.5.3 (1) Site Coefficient, F, 1.5 Table 1613.5.3(2) Geologic Hazard Assessment Ground Rupture Ground rupture due to active faulting is not considered likely due to the absence of known fault traces within the vicinity of the project, however, this possibility cannot be completely nded out. The unlikely hazard of ground rupture should not preclude consideration of "flexible" design for on -site utility lines and connections. Liquefaction Liquefaction involves the substantial loss of shear strength in saturated soils, usually sandy soils with a loose consistency when subjected to earthquake shaking. Based on the absence of shallow groundwater and consistency of the underlying terrace deposits, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction is very low. Landsliding There is no indication that landslides or unstable slope conditions exist on or adjacent to the project site. There are no obvious geologic hazards related to landsliding to the proposed development or adjacent properties. Tsunamis and Seiches The site is not subject to inundation by tsunamis due to its elevation and distance from the ocean. The site is also not subject to Seiches (waves in confined bodies of water). DON & CARI SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 114784 GEOTEC}INICAL EVALUATION Based on our investigation and evaluation of the collected information, we conclude that the proposed structural development is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided the recommendations provided in this report will be properly implemented during structural development. Based on the low expansion potential of the granular near - surface soils, it is our opinion that the building pads may be constructed using the on -site materials. In order to provide a uniform support for the structures, overexcavation and recompaction of the structural portions of the building pads will be required. The foundations may consist of reinforced continuous footings with conventional reinforced slabs. Recommendations and criteria for foundation design are provided in the Foundation and Slab recommendations section of this report. Compressible Soils Our field observations and testing indicate low compressibility within the sedimentary bedrock, which underlies the site. However, loose fill and topsoil were typically encountered to depths of approximately 2 to 6 feet below surface grades. These soils are compressible. Due to the potential for soil compression upon loading, remedial grading of these near- surface soils (including overexcavation and recompaction) will be required. Following implementation of the earthwork recommendations presented herein, the potential for soil compression resulting from the new development has been estimated to be low. The low- settlement assessment assumes a well - planned and maintained site drainage system. Recommendations regarding mitigation by earthwork construction are presented in the Grading and Earthwork recommendations section of this report. Expansive Soils Expansion index tests were performed on representative samples of the fill and formational soils to determine volumetric change characteristics with change in moisture content. Expansion indexes of 0 were obtained which indicates a very low expansion potential for the foundation soils. Groundwater Static groundwater was not encountered to the depths of the boreholes. The subject site is located at an elevation of approximately 150 feet above Mean Sea Level. We do not expect groundwater to affect the proposed construction. Recommendations to prevent or mitigate the effects of poor surface drainage are presented in the Drainage section of this report. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon the analysis of the data and information obtained from our soil investigation. This includes site reconnaissance; field investigation; laboratory testing and our general knowledge of the soils native to the site. The site is 7 DON & CART SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 1147B4 suitable for the proposed residential development provided the recommendations set forth are implemented during construction. GRADING AND EAR'T'HWORK Based upon the proposed construction and the information obtained during the field investigation, we anticipate that the proposed structures will be founded on continuous footings, which are supported by properly compacted fill. The following grading and earthwork recommendations are based upon the limited geotechnical investigation performed, and should be verified during construction by our field representative. Clearine and Grubbin All areas to be graded or to receive fill and/or structures should be cleared of vegetation. Vegetation and the debris from the clearing operation should be properly disposed of off -site. The area should be thoroughly inspected for any possible buried objects, which need to be rerouted or removed prior to the inception of, or during grading. All holes, trenches, or pockets left by the removal of these objects should be properly backfilled with compacted fill materials as recommended in the Method and Criteria of Compaction section of this report. Structural Improvement of Soils Information obtained from our field and laboratory analysis indicates that loose fill and topsoil cover the site to depths of approximately 2 to 6 feet below existing grade. These surficial soils are susceptible to settlement upon loading. Based upon the soil characteristics, we recommend the following: * All fill, topsoil and other loose natural soils should be completely removed from areas, which are planned to receive compacted fills and/or structural improvements. The bottom of the removal area should expose competent materials as approved by ECSC&E geotechnical representative. Prior to the placement of new fill, the bottom of the removal area should be scarified a minimum depth of 6 inches, moisture-conditioned within 2 percent above the optimum moisture content, and then recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D1557 test method). ' Overexcavation should be completed for the structural building pads to a minimum depth of 2 feet below the bottom of the proposed footings. The limit of the required areas of overexcavation should be extended a minimum of 5 feet laterally beyond the perimeter footings (building footprints). * For non - structural areas, such as driveways, we recommend overexcavation to a minimum depth of 2 feet below existing grade. ' Soils utilized as fill should be moisture- conditioned and recompacted in conformance with the following Method and Criteria of Compaction section of this report The depth and extent of any overexcavation and recompaction should be evaluated in the field by a representative of 3 DON & CAR] SANFORD, 820 OPPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 1147B4 ECSC &E. The top 3 feet of fill soils under the proposed structures should be granular and non expansive. Transitions Between Cut and Fill The proposed structures are anticipated to be founded in properly compacted fill. Cut to fill transitions below the proposed structures should be completely eliminated during the earthwork construction as required in the previous section. Method and Criteria of Compaction Compacted fills should consist of approved soil material, free of trash debris, roots, vegetation or other deleterious materials. Fill soils should be compacted by suitable compaction equipment in uniform loose lifts of 6 to 8 inches. Unless otherwise specified, all soils subjected to recompaction should be moisture- conditioned within 2 percent over the optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction per ASTM test method DI 557. The on -site granular and non - expansive soils, after being processed to delete the aforementioned deleterious materials, may be used for recompaction purposes. Should any importation of fill be planned, the intended import source(s) should be evaluated and approved by ECSCE prior to delivery to the site. Care should be taken to ensure that these soils are not detrimentally expansive. Erosion Control Due to the granular characteristics of the on -site soils, areas of recent grading or exposed ground may be subject to erosion. During construction, surface water should be controlled via berms, gravel/ sandbags, silt fences, straw wattles, siltation basins, positive surface grades or other method to avoid damage to the finish work or adjoining properties. All site entrances and exits must have coarse gravel or steel shaker plates to minimize offsite sediment tracking. Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be used to protect storm drains and minimize pollution. The contractor should take measures to prevent erosion of graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. After completion of grading, all excavated surfaces should exhibit positive drainage and eliminate areas where water might pond. Standard Grading Guidelines Grading and earthwork should be conducted in accordance with the standard -of- practice methods for this local, the guidelines of the current edition of the Uniform Building Code, and the requirements of the jurisdictional agency. Where the information provided in the geotechnical report differs from the Standard Grading Guidelines, the requirements outlined in the report shall govem. FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS a. Continuous and spread footings are suitable for use and should extend to minimum depths of 12 and 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade for the proposed one and two -story structures respectively into the properly compacted fill soils. Continuous footings should be at least 12 and 15 inches in width respectively and reinforced with four 94 steel bars; two bars placed near the top .7 DON & CARI SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10-1147B4 of the footings and the other two bars placed near the bottom of the footings. Isolated or spread footings should have a minimum width of 24 inches. Their reinforcement should consist of a minimum of #4 bars spaced 12 inches on center (each way) and placed horizontally near the bottom. b. Interior concrete floor slabs should be a minimum 4 inches thick. Reinforcement should consist of #3 bars placed at 18 inches on center each way within the middle third of the slabs by supporting the steel on chairs or concrete blocks "dobies ". The slabs should be underlain by 2 inches of clean sand over a 10 -mil visqueen moisture barrier. The effect of concrete shrinkage will result in cracks in virtually all -concrete slabs. To reduce the extent of shrinkage, the concrete should be placed at a maximum of 4 -inch slump. The minimum steel recommended is not intended to prevent shrinkage cracks. e. Where moisture sensitive floor coverings are anticipated over the slabs, the 10 -mil plastic moisture barrier should be underlain by a capillary break at least 2 inches thick, consisting of coarse sand, gravel or crushed rock not exceeding 3/4 inch in size with no more than 5 percent passing the #200 sieve. b. An allowable soil bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot may be used for the design of continuous and spread footings at least 12 inches wide and founded a minimum of 12 inches into properly compacted fill soils or the dense sandstone of the Terrace Deposits Formation as set forth in the 2007 California Building Code, Table 1804.2. This value may be increased by 400 psf for each additional foot of depth or width to a maximum value of 4,000 Ib /ft2. e. Lateral resistance to horizontal movement may be provided by the soil passive pressure and the friction of concrete to soil. An allowable passive pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of depth may be used A coefficient of friction of 0.35 is recommended The soils passive pressure as well as the bearing value may be increased by 1/3 for wind and seismic loading. SETTLEMENT Settlement of compacted fill soils is normal and should be anticipated. Because of the type and minor thickness of the fill soils anticipated under the proposed footings and the light building loads, total and differential settlements should be within acceptable limits. PRESATURATiON OF SLAB SUBGRADE Because of the granular characteristics of the existing soils, presoaking of the subgrade prior to concrete pour is not required. However, subgrade soils in areas receiving concrete should be watered prior to concrete placement to mitigate any drying shrinkage, which may occur following site grading. TEMPORARY SLOPES For the excavation of foundations and utility trenches, temporary vertical cuts to a maximum height of 4 feet may be constructed in fill or natural soil. Any temporary cuts beyond the above height 10 DON & CAR] SANFORD. 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE. ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 1147B4 constraints should be shored or further laid back following a 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope ratio. OSHA guidelines for trench excavation safety should be implemented during construction. PERMANENT SLOPES Permanent cut and fill slopes are anticipated to be less than 5 feet in height and may be constructed no steeper than 2:1 (horizontal to vertical). These slopes are anticipated to be grossly stable. It is recommended that drought resistant vegetation be planted as soon as practical to enhance the stability of the slope surfaces. RETAINING WALLS Cantilevered retaining walls should be designed for an "active" lateral earth pressure of 35 psf/ft (35 pcf EFP) for approved granular backfill and level backfill conditions. Where cantilevered walls support 2:1 (hor:vert) sloping backfill, the equivalent active fluid pressure should be increased to 45 pcf. Cantilever walls subject to uniform surcharge loads should be designed for an additional uniform lateral pressure equal to one -third (113) the anticipated surcharge pressure. Restrained walls, such as basement walls should be designed utilizing an "at- rest" earth pressure of 60 psf/ft (60 pcf EFP) for approved granular and level backfill. Restrained walls subject to uniform surcharge loads should be designed for an additional uniform lateral pressure equal to one -half (1/2) the anticipated surcharge. Retaining wall footings should be embedded a minimum of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. Retaining walls that are to be located near the top of slopes should be designed to allow a minimum daylight distance of 7 feet laterally from the outside edge of the footing to the slope face. Soil design criteria, such as bearing capacity, passive earth pressure and sliding resistance as recommended under the Foundation and Slab recommendations section, may be incorporated into the retaining wall design. The design and location of retaining walls should be reviewed by our firm for conformance with our recommendations. Footings should be reinforced as recommended by the structural engineer and appropriate back drainage provided to avoid excessive hydrostatic wall pressures. As a minimum we recommend a fabric- wrapped crushed rock and perforated pipe system. At least 2 cubic feet per linear foot of free - drainage crushed rock should be provided. The remaining wall backfill should consist of approved granular material. This fill material should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent as determined by ASTM D -1557 test method. Flooding or jetting of backfill should not be permitted. Granular backfill should be capped with a minimum 18 inches of relatively impervious fill to sea] the backfill and prevent saturation. It should be noted that the use of heavy compaction equipment in close proximity to retaining structures can result in wall pressures exceeding design values and corresponding wall movement I DON & CARI SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 1147B4 greater than that associated with active or at -rest conditions. In this regard, the contractor should take appropriate precautions during the backfill placement. CONCRETE PAVEMENT For the proposed concrete driveway which is planned to support light vehicular traffic, the following minimum section is recommended: Location Traffic Index Pavement Section Private Driveway 4.0 6' PCC on Compacted Sub grade The upper 12 inches of subgrade should be moisture conditioned at least 2 percent over optimum and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction (ASTM D155 ). PCC Pavement should be a minimum 3,500 -psi concrete. It is recommended that steel reinforcement be provided for PCC pavements, which sustain heavy impact loading, such as fire trucks. As a minimum for such slabs, we recommend #3 steel bars placed on 24 -inch on centers each way. Placement of concrete, control/ expansion joints and any such reinforcement should be in conformance with ACI specifications and the structural engineer design. TRENCH BACKFILL Excavations for utility lines, which extend under structural areas should be properly backfilled and compacted Utilities should be bedded and backfilled with clean sand or approved granular soil to a depth of at least one foot over the pipe. This backfill should be uniformly watered and compacted to a firm condition for pipe support. The remainder of the backfill should be on -site soils or non - expansive imported soils, which should be placed in thin lifts, moisture- conditioned and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. DRAINAGE Adequate measures should be undertaken to properly finish grade the site after the structures and other improvements are in place, such that the drainage water within the site and adjacent properties is directed away from the foundations, footings, floor slabs and the tops of slopes via rain gutters, downspouts, surface swales and subsurface drains towards the natural drainage for this area. A minimum gradient of 1 percent is recommended in hardscape areas. For earth areas, a minimum gradient of 5 percent away from the structures for a distance of at least 5 feet should be provided. Earth swales should have a minimum gradient of 2 percent. Drainage should be directed to approved drainage facilities. Proper surface and subsurface drainage will be required to minimize the potential of water seeking the level of the bearing soils under the foundations, footings and floor slabs, which may otherwise result in undermining and differential settlement of the structures and other improvements. 12 DON & CARI SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 114784 FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW Our firm should review the foundation plans during the design phase to assure conformance with the intent of this report. During construction, foundation excavations should be observed by our representative prior to the placement of forms, reinforcement or concrete for conformance with the plans and specifications. LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION Our investigation was performed using the skill and degree of care ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. This report is prepared for the sole use of our client and may not be assigned to others without the written consent of the client and ECSC&E, Inc. The samples collected and used for testing, and the observations made, are believed representative of site conditions; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between exploration trenches, boreholes and surface exposures. As in most major projects, conditions revealed by construction excavations may vary with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by a representative of ECSC &E and designs adjusted as required or alternate designs recommended. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the project architect and engineer. Appropriate recommendations should be incorporated into the structural plans. The necessary steps should be taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. The findings of this report are valid as of this present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside of our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should be updated after a period of two years. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The review of plans and specifications, field observations and testing under our direction are integral parts of the recommendations made in this report. If East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc. is not retained for these services, the client agrees to assume our responsibility for any potential claims that may arise during construction. Observation and testing are additional services, which are provided by our firm, and should be budgeted within the cost of development. Plates No. 1 through 3, Page L -I and References are parts of this report. 13 aWK14:5 Xkvd6 : 1 4 �� QLs 0 L V4A 0 E43T COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION & ENGINEERING. INC. 10925 HARTLEY RD.. SUITE 1. SANTEE, CA 92071 POW , "� '�� � � f�O ✓�Gi (619) 258 -7901 Fu (619) 25 &7902 lev Noy- e" , DON & CARI SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 114784 PLATE NO.2 SUMMARY SHEET BOREHOLE NO. 1 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface FILL dark brown, damp, loose, silty sand 0.5' TOPSOIL dark brown, moist, loose, porous, silty sand with rootlets 2.0' TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt) tan brown, moist, medium dense to dense, silty sand 5.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 10/27/10 BOREHOLE NO.2 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface TOPSOIL dark brown, moist, loose, porous, silty sand with rootlets 2.5' TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt) tan brown, moist, medium dense to dense, silty sand 5.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 10127/10 BOREHOLE NO.3 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface FILL dark brown, moist, loose, silty sand 1.5' t[ it a, H U 3.0' layer of concrete, rubble and rock 4.0 TOPSOIL dark brown, moist, loose, porous, silty sand with rootlets 4.5' .. ., ,< u 5.5' TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt) tan brown, moist, medium dense to dense, silty sand 6.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 10/27/10 Y = DRY DENSITY IN PCF 14 Y FA M ISI Y M 109.4 8.0 108.6 5.5 M = MOISTURE CONTENT IN % DON & CAR] SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 114784 PLATE NO.2 (Continued) SUMMARY SHEET BOREHOLE NO. 4 (Seepage Pit) DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Y Surface TOPSOIL dark brown, moist, loose, porous, silty sand with rootlets 2.0' TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt) tan brown, moist, medium dense to dense, silty sand 5.0' reddish brown, moist, dense silty sand 45.0' TORREY SANDSTONE (Tt) light tan, moist, medium dense to dense poorly graded sand with silt 55.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater BOREHOLE NO.5 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Y Surface TOPSOIL dark brown, moist, loose, porous, silty sand with rootlets 2.0' TERRACE DEPOSITS FORMATION (Qt) tan brown, moist, medium dense to dense, silty sand 4.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 10/28/10 Y = DRY DENSITY IN PCF 15 M = MOISTURE CONTENT IN % lul M MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL DESCRIPTION US STANDARD GW STEVE SIZE I MILLIMETERS BOULDERS WELL GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL -SAND I Above 305 COBBLES 12 Inches To 3 Inches MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GP 3 Inches to No. 4 76.2 to 4.76 GRAVELS 3 Inches to % Inch (MORE THAN % Fine POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL-SAND 19.1 to 4.76 OF COARSE No. 4 to No. 200 MIXTURES. LITTLE OR NO FINES GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL- SAND -SILT MIXTURES 4.76 w 2.00 FRACTION >N0.4 SIEVE No. 10 to No. 40 SIZE) Fine No. 40 to No. 200 GC SILT AND CLAY COARSE Bcrow 0.074 . on CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES GRAINED SOILS I I (MORE THAN Y2 OF SOIL SW > NO. 200 SIEVE SUT) I WELL GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES SP SANDS (MORE THAN h POORLY GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, OF COARSE LITTLE OR NO FINES SM SILTY SANDS, SILT -SAND MIXTURES FRACTION < NO.4 SIEVE SIZE) SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND -CLAY MDCRAFS ML INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS & SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY CLAYS CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, < 50 SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS OL FINE GRAINED SOILS ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY (MORE THAN !6 OF SOIL MH <NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE) INORGANIC SILTS. MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS SILTS & FINE SANDY OR SILTY SOILS. ELASTIC SILTS CLAYS CH LIQUID LIMIT INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT > 50 CLAYS OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY. ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS. ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Pt PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SODS CLASSIFICATION CHART (UNIFIED SOIL. CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM) CLASSIFICATION I RANGE OF GRAIN SIZES US STANDARD GRALN SIZE IN STEVE SIZE I MILLIMETERS BOULDERS Above 12 Inches I Above 305 COBBLES 12 Inches To 3 Inches 305 To 76.2 GRAVEL 3 Inches to No. 4 76.2 to 4.76 Come 3 Inches to % Inch 76.2 to 19.1 Fine Y Inch to No. 4 19.1 to 4.76 SAND No. 4 to No. 200 4.76 to 0.074 Come No 4 to No. 10 4.76 w 2.00 Medium No. 10 to No. 40 2.00 to 0.420 Fine No. 40 to No. 200 0.420 to 0.074 SILT AND CLAY 1 Below No, 200 Bcrow 0.074 GRAIN SIZE CHART EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 U.S.C.S. SOIL CLASSIFICATION PLASTICITY CHART DON 6 CAR! SANFORD PROJECT PROJECT NO. 10- 114704 PLATE NO. 3 NOV. 10, 2010 I . on M`IOL I I I I PLASTICITY CHART DON 6 CAR! SANFORD PROJECT PROJECT NO. 10- 114704 PLATE NO. 3 NOV. 10, 2010 DON & CAR! SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO 10- 114789 PAGE L-1 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D1557) The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the fill materials as determined by ASTM D1557, Procedures A and B which use 25 blows of a 10 -pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 4 -inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot compaction cylinder and Procedure C which uses 56 blows of a 10 -pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 6 -inch diameter 1/13.3 cubic foot compaction cylinder are presented as follows: OPTIMUM MAXIMUM MOISTURE SOIL TYPE/ DRY DENSITY CONTENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION (PCF) ( %) LOCATION 1/A DARK BROWN SILTY SAND 132.5 8.0 BH -3 @ 2.0' EXPANSION INDEX TEST (ASTM D4829) INITIAL SATURATED INITIAL DRY MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY EXPANSION CONTENT( %) CONTENT( %) (PCF) INDEX LOCATION 8.0 16.1 1 19.8 0 BH -3 @ 2.0' 7.0 13.9 119.8 0 BH -2 @ 3.0' PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS (ASTM D422) t,} 6 e .t 75 Sieve Size ,+ x � ?t T C" E' FeteentPassing; BW2 @ 1.5' Topsoil ~ 3 .rr .I: ` :� j°erceatPassing BFI -3 @ 2.0' r .Fill �t •�'.?" "i Nw >seicentPassing' BH -2 @ 3.0' ,;,'Terrace its a ;_ Percent Passing BH-4 @ 14.0' Ten-ace Deposits _' Percent Passing - BHA @ 45.0' Torrey Sandstone 11T, 100 - 3/8" 99 100 #4 99 100 99 - #8 98 99 99 - 100 #16 98 98 99 100 98 #30 90 86 90 90 89 #50 46 41 50 40 45 #100 26 24 30 20 15 #200 20 19 23 16 6 USCS SM SM SM SM SPSM 16 DON & CAR! SANFORD, 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS PROJECT NO. 10- 1147B4 REFERENCES 1. "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Garage and Deck Extension, 1030 Stratford Drive, City of Encinitas, California ", Project No. 10- 1167C1, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated September 28, 2010. 2. "Egfaultl Eqsearch, Version 3.0 ", by Blake, T.F., 2000, Updated 2008. 3. "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Single - Family Residence, 1521 Neptune Avenue, APN 254- 030 -29, City of Encinitas, California 92024 ", Project No. 08- 1147A3(2), Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated December 23, 2008. 4. "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Single- Family Residence, 808 Clark Avenue, City of Encinitas, California ", Project No. 07- I147C4, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated December 11, 2007. 5. "2007 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2 ", Published by International Code Council. 6. "Geotechnical and Foundation Engineering: Design and Construction', by Robert W. Day, 1999. 7. "1997 Uniform Building Code, Volume 2, Structural Engineering Design Provisions ", Published by International Conference of Building Officials 8. "Maps of Known Active Fault Near- Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada to be used with the 1997 Uniform Building Code ", Published by International Conference of Building Officials. 9. "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California ", Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, by Siang S. Tan and Michael P. Kennedy, 1996. 10. `Bearing Capacity of Soils, Technical Engineering and Design Guides as Adapted from the US Army Corps of Engineers, No. 7 ", Published by ASCE Press, 1994. 11. "Foundations and Earth Structures, Design Manual 72 ", by Department of Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, May 1982, Revalidated by Change 1 September 1986. 17 820 ORPHEUS AVE., ENCINITAS CA. GRADING AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATE DRAWINGS 10799 -G EXHIBIT A Estimate Prepare By: CIVIL CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 5/18/2011 QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL GRADING: / v $4,930 Erosion Control $8,261 Clear and Grub / \ 0 SF $0.45 $0 Excavate and Export Plus 10% Contingency $3,418 Total Estimate $37,601 � 0-1000 44 CY $27.50 $1.210 0-20000 0 CY $22.00 $0 Excavate and Fill P� 0-1000 186 CY $20.00 $3,720 SUBTOTAL $4,930 EROSION CONTROL: Siltation Fence, SC -1 771 LF $1.60 $1,234 Gravel Bags, SC-6 & SC-8 134 EA $1.82 $244 Stabilized Construction Entrance, TC -1 621 SF $5.25 $3,260 Fiber Rolls SC -5 680 LF $371 $2,523 Concrete Washout WM -8 1 EA $50000 $500 Material Delivery and Storage WM -1 1 EA $500.00 $500 SUBTOTAL 56.261 STORM DRAIN Drywell 75 SF $8.00 $600 Vegetated Swale 270 LF $800 $2,160 Rock Lined Swale 423 LF $8.00 $3,384 SUBTOTAL $6,144 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS: Masonry Retaining Wall, C -1 to C -2 150 SF $2965 $4,448 Driveway 6191 SF $168 $10,401 $14,848 M chael J. McCall, CE 53444 Improvement Items Grading $4,930 Erosion Control $8,261 Storm Drain $6,144 Miscellaneous $14,848 Subtotal Estimate $34,183 Plus 10% Contingency $3,418 Total Estimate $37,601 Page 1 of 1 Order No.: 5034056c Es No.: Page Number: 2 PRELIMINARY REPORT In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, this company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Exhibit A attached. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Exhibit A. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to below and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Exhibit A of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. First American Title Insurance Company ATTEST fl�' V � SGGRL INfY First American Title Company Order No.: 5034056c Escrow No.: Page Number 3 Dated as of February 14, 2011 at 7:30 A.M. The form of Policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: ALTA Loan Policy 1056.06 (6-17 -06) A specific request should be made if another form or additional coverage is desired. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: HOANG KOVARIK, A MARRIED WOMAN AS HER SOLE AND SEPARATE PROPERTY The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is: A FEE The Land referred to herein is described as follows: (See attached Legal Description) At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: 1. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2011 -2012, a lien not yet due or payable. 2. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2010 -2011. First Installment: $ 1,414.61, DELINQUENT Penalty: $ 141.46 SPZ lye Q�cL Second Installment: $ 1,414.61, DUE tr r_`I fi3 �r� Penalty: $ 151.46 Q �U "l Tax Rate Area: 19078 A. P. No.: 256- 242 -57 -00 3. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to Chapter 3.5 commencing with Section 75 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. 4. The lien of bonds and assessment liens, if applicable, collected with the general and special taxes. 5. Easements and servitudes as they appear on maps, or in documents recorded in the Official Records of said County and matters in various instruments of record which contain, among other things, easements and rights of way in, on, over or under the common area, if applicable, for the purpose of constructing, erecting, operating or maintaining thereon or there under, overhead or underground lines, cables, wires, conduits, or other devices for electricity, power, telephone and other purposes, storm water drains and pipes, water systems, sprinkling systems, water, heating and gas lines or pipes and any similar public or quasi - public improvements or facilities. Also, the equitable right of use and enjoyment in and to and throughout the common First American Title Company Order No.: 5034056c Escrow No.: Page Number. 4 area, if applicable, as well as nonexclusive easements and equitable right for ingress to the owner herein described. Reference is hereby being made to various documents and maps of record for full and further particulars. 6. Limitations, covenants, conditions, restrictions, resolutions, annexations, reservations, easements, exceptions, terms, assessments, liens and charges, if applicable, in instruments recorded in the official records of said county any amendments and modifications thereto, which provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any first mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate 42 USC 3604(C) or applicable state law. First American Title Company Order No.: 50340560 Escrow No.: Page Number: 5 INFORMATIONAL NOTES 1. This report is preparatory to the issuance of an ALTA Loan Policy. We have no knowledge of any fact which would preclude the issuance of the policy with CLTA endorsement forms 100 and 116 and if applicable, 115 and 116.2 attached. When issued, the CLTA endorsement form 116 or 116.2, if applicable will reference a(n) Single Family Residence known as 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE, ENCINITAS, CA. 2. According to the public records, there has been no conveyance of the land within a period of twenty four months prior to the date of this report, except as follows: Trustee's Deed recorded May 26, 2010 as Instrument No. 2010-0262479. Amount of the unpaid debt together with costs was $881,465.87. A document recorded OCTOBER 08, 2010 as INSTRUMENT NO. 2010 - 0542048 of Official Records From: MICHAEL KOVARIK, SPOUSE OF GRANTEE HEREIN To: HOANG KOVARIK, A MARRIED WOMAN AS HER SOLE AND SEPARATE PROPERTY A document recorded OCTOBER 08, 2010 as INSTRUMENT NO. 2010 - 0542049 of Official Records From: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. To: HOANG KOVARIK, A MARRIED WOMAN AS HER SOLE AND SEPARATE PROPERTY The map attached, if any, may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. First American Title Insurance Company expressly disclaims any liability for loss or damage which may result from reliance on this map except to the extent coverage for such loss or damage is expressly provided by the terms and provisions of the title insurance policy, if any, to which this map is attached. Note: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than the certain dollar amount set forth in any applicable arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. If you desire to review the terms of the policy, including any arbitration clause that may be included, contact the office that issued this Commitment or Report to obtain a sample of the policy jacket for the policy that is to be issued in connection with your transaction. First American Title Company Order No.: 5034056c Escrow No.: Page Number: 6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Real property in the City of ENCINITAS, County of SAN DIEGO, State of Califonnia, described as follows: ALL OF LOT 10 IN BLOCK "D" OF SOUTH COAST PARK ANNEX, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 1788, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MARCH 29, 1924. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTHERLY 132.00 FEET. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LOT 10 BLOCK "D" LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY 192.00 FEET. First American Title Company Order No.: 5034056c Escrow No.: Page Number: 7 NOTICE Section 12413.1 of the California insurance code, effective January 1, 1990, requires that any title insurance company, under - written title company, underwritten title company, or controlled escrow company handling funds in an escrow or sub - escrow capacity, wait a specified number of days after depositing funds, before recording any documents in connection with the trans -action or disbursing funds. This statute allows for funds deposited by wire transfer to be disbursed the same day as deposit. In the case of cashier's checks or certified checks, funds may be disbursed the next day after deposit. In order to avoid unnecessary delays of three to seven days, or more please use wire transfer, cashier's checks, or certified checks whenever possible. NOTICE In accordance with section 18662 of the revenue and taxation code, a buyer may be required to withhold an amount equal to three and one -third percent of the sales price in the case of the disposition of California real property interest by either: 1. A seller who is an individual with a last known street address outside of California or when the disbursement instructions authorize the proceeds be sent to a financial intermediary of the seller, or 2. A corporate seller which has no permanent place of business in California. The buyer may become subject to penalty for failure to withhold an amount equal to the greater of 10 percent of the amount required to be withheld or five hundred dollars ($500). However, notwithstanding any other provision included in the California statutes referenced above, no buyer will be required to withhold any amount or be subject to penalty for failure to withhold if: 1. The sales price of the California real property conveyed does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), or 2. The seller executes a written certificate, under the penalty of perjury, certifying that the seller is a resident of California, or if a corporation, has a permanent place of business in California, or 3. The seller, who is an individual, executes a written certifcate, under the penalty of perjury, that the California real property being conveyed is the seller's principal residence (as defined in section 1034 of the internal revenue code). The seller is subject to penalty for knowingly filing a fraudulent certificate for the purpose of avoiding the withholding requirement. The California statutes referenced above include provisions which authorize the franchise tax board to grant reduced withholding and waivers from withholding on a case -by -case basis. The parties to this transaction should seek an attomey's, accountants, or other tax specialists opinion concerning the effect of this law on this transaction and should not act on any statements made or omitted by the escrow or closing officer. First Amencan Title Company �oo m yl L aipt� Na 1 256 -24 . "25ea PNI<Jet '�!Ae - - \ i Lhd._- WY 'x""of'6iw'• &16iV'4�ieseoR. LY d1 ><i } SO 3 Hwy , - B FR" 3 I H,p 1' =100' SHT2 `�Lv ° s O ry 254 k♦ hv��^ 27 •° ^[R,�� p R =aP.> n` r n Q A e I .lino, "'��' � =�•1, ?v `B xh mg BLKF PORT IS �; D.9>M. NI ) � O 1 ] W 4 4 r, 'nii yN • Ip ^.i R 'F•e \fir i'.� ryy m W. \ oM.I 0 P Q a s t � ei ° dA rq Oe,R 243 � ?i •'Stfl ws l�i� _ Z a+, AVE 'riw•. 7 12 PM lose, cv5a ' .a. nL.e• to a .L Tt r ,a. SHT t °' a, EOLUS •.,•u'w M. INLD 2. 24 'ir el 0 0 9 25 0 o P 0 SHT 1 r ' O o J 7 8 n IO 0 N = QI J 17S Da Q p n O 9 V1 a e f2 Lea.0 F Ob1L 10 12 00 ° ID _Otq ✓ro (] '' DO p 19a M 10 j 1 f1 n 4 LO, f 30 Oa • 100 W C Q Y of ♦ 1 BLK J Q � t a A In,eL I I/ 0 O ° OftK !I D •,� O <)� " .S Oa Pa R.4 pl Q POR 2 O ! �OQ Q O, oYM j Q yK 43 199 1Aa LL� n O.SiM.�a O.bK 0.75K. J r A s ,a)I J IOO i5 Q nv ; 7 ♦•e , ,,., cl 1 wrw 19 ^�� I_I I' al 5 tJ j , WRI RM2 PM. ° © >9 40 4 IL 0 I Lr,. C4P.1 N Q 5e N `R � � vM fl °> ,ll f 9f ♦ei L >< 911L le). 1 ]! 1 ♦ ; i 8 \S 9>QG. 1; AVE. I 251 0� 76 0 sox muPn rya HYMET'TUfi 33 sHT t N "5t m wry 273 SHr 1 AP 1788 - SOUTH COAST PARK ANNEX SHT 2 ROS 5770, 5826, 5944, 8882 ,12702 �oo m yl L Order No S034OS6c E -u row No PaQe Nonit, 9 WIRE INSTRUCTIONS for First American Title Company First American Trust, FSB 5 First American Way Santa Ana, CA 92707 ABA #122241255 ACCOUNT #3110610000 CREDIT: First American Title Company Escrow Trust Account TITLE OFFICER: TITLE #5034056c NOTE: THIS INFORMATION SHOULD BE USED FOR ALL FUNDS TO BE WIRED FOR THIS ORDER. PLEASE INCLUDE THE TITLE OFFICER'S NAME AND TITLE NUMBER WHEN WIRING FUNDS. First American Title Company Order No.: 50340561 Eurow No.: Page Number: 10 EXHIBIT A LIST OF PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (BY POLICY TYPE) 1. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against his or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason Of. 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notice of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any fags, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary fines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the public records. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attomeys fees or expenses which arse by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, o regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibmng or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a dhange in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting horn a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has omrmed prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable "doing business" laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which apses out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and s based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or lath in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting In the insured the estate or interest insured by their policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. 2. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B - 1970 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions of area of the Land, or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant ether at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy and not disclosed in vmbng by the insured First American Title Company Order No.: 5034056c Escrow No.: Page Number: 11 claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained N the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 3. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM 6 - 1970 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 2 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE 6 This policy does not insure against loss of damage by reason of the matters shown in parts one and two following: Part One 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any fads, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but whleh could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making Inquiry of persons In possession thereof. 3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage In area, encroachments, or any other fads which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Ads authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 4. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1970 WITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant, (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and no disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder, (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured daimarR; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy). 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of failure of the insured at Date of Policy or of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness to comply with applicable "doing business' laws of the state in which the land is situated. S. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1970 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association Lenders Policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy, the exclusions set forth in paragraph 4 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE 6 This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the natters shown in parts one and two following: Part One I. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any fads, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, enooadiments, or any other farts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are no shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations ot exceptions in patents or in Acs authgrizmg the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or matenal theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and no shown by the public records. 6. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1992 WITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE First American Title Company Order No.: S014056c Escrow No.: Page Number: 12 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: I. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the Land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the modem that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien a encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy; (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Polity. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the Insured claimant and not disclosed In writing to the Company by the Insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or the extent insurance 6 afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at date of policy); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would no have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceabi ty of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable "doing business" laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceabillty of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arses out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or moth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the Land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage whch at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction treating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar cmdltors rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction treating the interest of the inured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; M (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. 7. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Tolle Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 6 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of I. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor a material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. B. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY - 1992 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE First Amencan Title Company Order No.: 5034056e Escrow No.: Page Number: 13 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded In the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the pubic records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has omunred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, eoomthrancces, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the pudic records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prim to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Dare of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained tithe Insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest Inured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured try this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. 9. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY - 1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and no as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 8 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCNEOULE 0 This policy does not insure against less or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: Part One: I Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the pudic records. 2. Any fads, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown try the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the pubic records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exception in patents or in Acts authorizing the ssuancce thereof; water rights, claim or tide to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, Imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 10. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY - 1987 EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees and expenses resulting from 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. Thin includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: • land use - land division • improvements on the land - environmental protection 2. This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date. 3. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in items 12 and 13 of Covered Tide Risks. q. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless: • a notice of exercising the night appears in the public records on the Policy Date • the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and s binding on you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking. 5. Title Risks: • that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you First American Title Company Order No.: S034056c Escrow No.: Page Number: 14 • that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date - unless they appeared in the pudic records • that result in no loss to you • that first affect your title after the Policy Date - this does not limit the latxx and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks Failure to pay value for your title. Lack of a right: • to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A, or • in streets, alleys, or waterways Mat touch your land This exclusion does not limit the acci coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks. FF��Ld [37S•Ii�wZ.l:[•I ^L'[�iF�•IrL•� CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE - 2008 ALTA HOMEOWNERS POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE - 2008 Covered Risks 16 (Subdivision law Violation). 18 (Building Permit). 19 (Zoning) and 21 (Encroachment of boundary walls or fences) are subject to Deductible Amounts and Maximum Dollar Limits of Liability EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: a. building c. land use e. land division b. zoning d. improvements on the land f. environmental protection This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be consbocted in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Lard by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Pudic Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Pudic Records at the policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, S.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title:. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. In streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk I or 21 LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows: Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Lability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liabil Covered Risk 16: 1% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $10,000.00 Covered Risk 18: 1% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $25,000.00 Covered Risk 19: 1% of Polley Amount or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $25,000.00 Covered Risk 21: 1% of Poky Amount or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $5,000.00 12. THIRD GENERATION EAGLE LOAN POLICY AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (1101/06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: First American Title Company Order No.: 5034056c Escrow No.: Page Number: 15 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ih) the character, dimensions, or location of arry improvement erected on the land; (ie) the subdivision of land; or(iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 6, 13(c), 13(d), 14 or 16. (b)Any governmental poke power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 6, 13(c), 13(d), 14 or 16. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse daims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known be the Company, rot recorded in the Public Retorts at Date of Palo, but Known to the Irnsured Clamant and not disclosed in writing to the Company, by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27 or 28); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing business laws of the sate where the Land s situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceabilKy, In whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, or any consumer credit protection or truth -in- lending law. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 26. 6. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceabiley, or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to Advances or modifications made after the Insured has Knowledge that the vest" shown in Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11. 7. Any lien on the Tide for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental autlrontyy and created or attaching subsequent to Date of Policy. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11(b) or 25. 8. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion of K, to have been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 5 or 6. 13. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 2006 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensom, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (ill) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6, 2. Rights of eminent domain. This E�rclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or S. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the Inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing- business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arses out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth -In- lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors? rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b). 14. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 2006 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS First American Title Company When the American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 14 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE 6 This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Taxes or asessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taring authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether Or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but chat could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the land. 3. Easements, hens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, vanation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 15. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY - 2006 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attomeys fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (Iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection;a the effect of any violation of these Laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 9 and 10); X (e) resu" in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had pad value for the Title. 4. Any claim, try reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors? rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. 16. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNERS POLICY - 2006 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusans set forth in paragraph 16 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE 8 This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained try an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions In patents or In Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. First American Title Company Q t First American Title Pnvacv Infornaion We one Cnnenided to Safeguarding CusOOner laananrn In =lee to behef serve Your reels row and in the foGre, we may ask You to novide us wth ratan nfommUm. We ude sbro that You may pe concerned abed w11a we, we do with sure iniamatiul' patiaualy any personal or read®. Y knostor. We ague, tat you eve a ruin to know, how we we uses, the personal rlornabon you povitle to us. Therefore, together with our supvdimes we have adopted th's Rwary Po" to goen Me use old Ilmdng of you personal nfanamh. Appr"bi y This Rtvacy Rlcy governs our use of the alfomralian Mal you provide b es. R does not cloven the mane in wNel we may use nhvmaborh we hae opened horn any other source, such as itformapal obtained from a public rein! or horn antler person or may. AM Ameelon has also adopted Goads gudelnes that govern or Ire a persuul khbrmatnn regardless of Rs sour, Rust Arvenon calls these guidelines is Fan Infomaborn Values. TI,pas of Infonsation Depending upon whiOi of our serol yw are utilizing. the, types of nonpublic pea cal infr onabdn tlat we nay collect m loot : e Nhrmapm we receive from you on applcapons, forms and in other mnmcuhicadons to us, whether in wnGg, in person, by ttlapinne or any other rtmns; e Inf inerlon about your to nsactlrres with us, our amWatetl mrryatles, or others; and! e Intorruabon we nacete team a consume renvag agent. use a IDforrrlallon We request infamaM1on from you for our awn Iegitirrate business purposes and not for Me benefit of any no mhImeJ party. Therefore we will not release you arf rnaUCn W nonaffiliated parties meept: (1) as necessary for us to provide one product or service, you have repueshes! a us; or (I) as perched by law. We mat, howoa, store such idonatlun nddnidy, Including the peed after which any aeliner re aboship has nosed. Such mfomlaUm may he used for any Internal pu poe, such as euady, contra efforts or custame analyses. We mat also provide all of the types of nmpul personal iVOrmalon I19eA above to one or none of our aRllatal mnpaniet. Such afhlsindl mrrpairs include feiahc ll service providers, such as hot Insurers, property and ,asaly, etsarers, and trust an invedrterd advisory corpanes, or conpmles iovave.d n reel estate services, such as appraisal cmpaua, hone war" conpanies and escrow, Da1gaG6. F r" eoc re, we may also provide all the knformam we inlet, as resorts! above, ro wrtpanles that perfonn matetlg services on err belatl, on be hap a our afFFated mrrpan. or to other fnahcal Institutions wi b whom we or nor ~ad RrnpmY6 ate pint mNMe" agreere ts. For, Re cn{mnwa Even F you are no longer our oustnner, our Rlrary Poky we cmdue to apply to You. CArbathift and stneilF We we use cur best eRa[s to erslm Mat no unmNhaated probes have access W any of you nhrnatlon. We restrict mans to nonpublic personal nrmna[nn about you to Mme indvquals and entities who read to know Mat lou nabm to pewee products a services to you. We web use our best dots to ban and oversee our errpbyitsts and agars to epee Mat your i fornmort will be handled responsibly and in aRDrdanR won this Rr/dLy, :fury and AM NeMTlfah'S Fan blbRnappll Va116 We currently n7•bkl pr"Prb• decir is , and pmmdra Safeguards th t mrph' web federa ceguladms ro gland tar rhagrblc personal nlanallm. loternutlon Obtained Inewough Our web see In general, onws t AM lukn is ri or ft to ateay eclat s the a World. Wid bcWetb i is ut bell yea know how vve treat kin nromnatm about about yourself elf orb the b Servsa In general, you can visa Fug address s, iis a stew. 'Wen oni tc the Watl Wee Wen wNnd peJb r be ova You ore or e torreg pry on the9 n pawl viewed!. Our Web seven coon. the OMNRI rl uses5, rest floe information o rneg6, th VkRaf. our s Ie /net to develop de s to ns nl&lA1R Ilhe en a o a ibe. aRlaje ache SDahI ah die 9fe, paJew VkW9l and 91Nar n(OmlNtbll. Fnwt An10i ar hE6 MIn waver, wh n measure a Ire a aP 9@ dDd tD, uch a 118E M anprU! dk D'lded s. err Sole. There are times, e.9 too when we may read mormation from Youe souk as your name iced anal su used Worm ns to resp n needed, we we use our best eRa6 to lot yw loner a the Grle a mistion how we wile Ise tae you chi nfama ckm person, the personal with inioniation we we onlect is need aYY nc , to respond b your ed abo t. m abler a aaow yea ro a� speilfc acmunVpmtk Information. If you dhrpse b sane ant Persava nlomhaip vdM us, we sunk only use d in aarrdanc! web the policies outlined newer. Business; Relationdepa Rost Arnakah Financial Corporation's site and no aofaa' sites may contain Inks b ~ Web sib. Whole we for b Well only to sdes that store nor high "AmE and respect for privacy, we ore not resporslbk for the dented or Me privacy practices elepkYrel by other SdCS. Sons of First Arrrdon's Wen sites may, make use of "cookie" technology to ontesure site activity and to arsbnhbe kdonatoh to yam personal tastes. A made is an elarerd of data that a Web site can send M your prays, which may Men store the mokle on your and drive. FrstAm.mm u% stared mokles. The goal of this technology Is to be ter save you when visiting our 9r, save you tine when yw aft hoe and to provide you with a more meaningful and Irodu ewit Web she ppererre. Fair Inbren d. Values Falrees, We consider consumer aperiatlms about their privacy in all our businesses. We ady ORa PnMrts ales Services that assure a favorable almCe bdwean mh9lnle bandds and cM9lrne pdvay. Polk Record We b91ne that an open cook rend creates sgrifrcano Value for so", mtwra mmrher choice and aealits mosluma opportunity. We actively support an open pudic r9brd and elWlasbe Is inpafaloe allot contribution to our eahomy. Use We believe we should belave responsibly when we one i form abon about a ptsme in err business We will obey the paws governing the collation, use and Olaamabh of data. Amrracy We Wit take reasonable steps M hW assure the accuracy of the dab ere mbct, use allot dsserma a Where possible. we we take rraasaaele seeps to caret namh2he ilfamaion. When, as will the pee r ® d. we pant colerl Ylaorle idomauw, we wel tae ao reasonable steps or assist mnvlres in Identifying the soaca of the aroneo56tm w Mat the conserver can secure the required corrections. IF - .. We endeavor to educate Me users of our products and services, our enpbyees and others in or industry about tle nnporbnce of consume ponmi,. We we n" our erchployees on our far khfvmatlon arses ad or the responsible wgaNan arN iae of data. We MI encourage ethers in our industry to collect ad use ihfanapah In a responsible manna. Seemly We wile oriental appropriate lam and sysbme b piDtec against unaUUt84 auk b and corruption of the data we insentient 02010 First Arno l n Financial Corporation AI rights reserved 0 NYSE: FAF onfirm Page 1 of 1 Receipt of Payment Your Transaction Was Processed on: 2/17/2011 4:56:37 PM Please print this page for your records. Payment Type: MC Transaction Time: 2/17/20114:56:37 PM Order Number: 898801 Card Holder Donald Sanford Address: 696 Poinsettia Park YP South Print Pua48M 00. �- ProPeny Ca —� Nnow Email: Type YP Paymwn AmowM Note: Payments may take 24 to 48 hours before they are reflected on your bill. Card Number: saa Expiration: 24257-09 KOVArbK HG/MG Seared 2nd hu rnu4 52,9T066 ToN Pay7r� 52.9706a Payment ESN 555.95 fees•. � Ss,a2s.sa City: Encinttas State: Ca ZIP: 92024 Email: timbenw.sl@holmail.com Phone: 760-685 -1816 Note: Payments may take 24 to 48 hours before they are reflected on your bill. Card Number: - -- -8386 Expiration: 02/13 Authorization: 09155P New Search / Pi �C� T.•T IBC C N"T•• cp $1v �y ..a `. June 27, 2011 Hoang Kovarik 820 Orpheus Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Permit issuance requirements for: Application 10799 -G Case No. 10 -170 CDP Site Address: 820 Orpheus Avenue APN: 256 - 242 -57 This letter summarizes the requirements for pulling your Engineering Permit for drawing 10799 -G. Your approved plan will remain valid for one year. If the permit is not issued within six months from the date of approval of the drawings, the plans will be subject to review by City staff for compliance with current codes and regulations before a permit can be issued, and changes to the approved plans as well as additional fees may be required. Please read through this letter carefully and contact the City with any questions you may have. It contains information about many requirements that may apply to your project and can make the process clearer and easier for you. In order to obtain the permits to construct the work shown on your approved plans, you will need to satisfy the requirements below. All of the items listed below must be submitted to the Engineering front counter in one complete Package at the time the applicant comes in to pull the permit. Partial submittals of an kind will not be accepted. Your project planchecker will not accept any of the documents listed on behalf of the Engineering front counter staff; all items must be submitted to the front counter directly together and at one time. The correct number of each of the requested documents must be provided; copies of documents submitted to the City during plancheck do not reduce the necessary quantities listed below. (1) Provide 4 print sets of the approved drawing 10799 -G Provide 2 copies of soils report titled "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Single Family Residence and Accessory Unit, 820 Orpheus Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024" prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc. dated November 10, 2010. (2) Post Security Deposits to guarantee all of the work shown on your approved drawings. The amounts of security deposits are determined directly from the Approved Engineer's Cost Estimate generated by your engineer according to a set of predetermined unit prices for each kind of work shown on your plans. You will be required to post security deposit(s) as follows: (a) Security Deposit for Grading Permit 10799 -G: in the amount $37,601.00 to guarantee both performance and labor/ materials for earthwork, drainage, private improvements, and erosion control. (b) NIA (c) NIA (d) N/A A minimum of 20% and up to 100% of the construction bond estimate dated May 18, 2011 amount listed in item(s) 2(a) must be in the form of cash, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Up to 80% of the amount listed in item 2(a) may be in the form of auto - renewing Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Up to 100% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(b), 2(c), and /or 2(d) may be in the form of auto - renewing Labor and Materials bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Cash, certificates of deposit, letters of credit, and assignments of account are also acceptable financial instruments. If a certificate of deposit (CD) will be obtained to secure the entire amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a) and/or 2(b), two separate CD's for 25% and 75% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a) and/or 2(b) should be obtained in order to facilitate any future partial release of those securities. CD's posted may be of any term but must be auto - renewing and must specify the City of Encinitas as a certificate holder and include a clause that until the City of Encinitas provides a written request for release of the CD, the balance shall be available to the City upon its sole request. The format of any financial instrument is subject to City approval, may be in the owner's name only, and must list the City of Encinitas as a Certificate Holder. For any questions regarding how to post securities, bonding, or the required format of securities, please contact Debra Geishart at 760 -633 -2779. (3) Pay non - refundable fees as listed below: Fee Type Amount Grading Inspection $1,880.00 NPDES Inspection (Grading) 376.00 Flood Control Fee __1120--00 The grading and improvement inspection fees are calculated based on 5% of first $100,000.00 of the approved Engineer's cost estimate of $37,601.00 dated May 18, 2011 and 3% of the cost estimate over $100,000.00. The NPDES inspection fee is assessed as 1% of the first $100,000.00 of the approved Engineer's cost estimate and 0.6% of the cost estimate over $100,000.00. The Flood control fee is assessed at a rate of $0.21 per square foot of net new impervious surface area for driveway and parking areas as created per the approved plan. (4) Provide the name, address, telephone number, state license number, and license type of the construction contractor. The construction of any improvements within the public right -of -way or public easements is restricted to qualified contractors possessing the required state license as listed in the table below. The contractor must also have on file with the City current evidence of one million dollar liability insurance listing the City of Encinitas as co- insured. Additional requirements are described in the handout "Requirements for Proof of Insurance" available at the Engineering front counter. Type Description Work to be Done A General Engineering any & all C -8 Concrete a ronlcurbl utter /ram /sidewalk C -10 Electrical lighting/signals C -12 Grading & Paving any surface, certain drain - basins/channels C -27 Landscaping planting /irrigation /fencing & other amenities C -29 Masonry retaining walls C -32 Parking &Highway Improvement i signage /striping /safety C -34 Pipeline sanitary sewer /storm drain (5) Permits are valid for no more than one year from the date of issuance and may expire earlier due to expirations of letter of credit and /or insurance policies. (6) This project does not propose land disturbance in excess of one acre and is exempt from the State Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) requirement. An erosion control plan shall be implemented per the approved grading plan. Preconstruction Meeting: A preconstruction meeting at the project site is mandatory for all projects. The preconstruction meeting may not be scheduled until the Engineering permit(s) have been issued, and the applicant/contractor must give the assigned Engineering inspector a minimum of 48 hours advance notice prior to the scheduled meeting time. Right-of-Way Construction Permit: A separate right -of -way construction permit will be required for any work in the public right -of -way or public easements. Typically, this work may include construction or reconstruction of a portion of the driveway within the public right -of -way, excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install electric, gas, telephone, and cable television lines, or water and sewer connections. A permit fee of $300.00 per application and a site plan, preferably the work order issued by the public utility, will be required. Contractor license and insurance requirements apply. Permits must be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the start of work. Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits: These separate permits may be required for your project and are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division. A fee of $250.00 is required for traffic control plans. For more details, contact Raymond Guarnes, Engineering Technician, at (760) 633 -2704. Release of Project Securities: project inspector. The processing and release of securities may take up to 4 weeks after the release process is initiated by the project Engineering inspector. Any cash releases will be mailed to the address on this letter unless the City is otherwise notified, and all letters mailed to a financial institution will be copied to the owner listed hereon. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection certified by the project Engineering inspector is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposit assigned to any Grading Permit. A sum in the amount of 25% of the securities posted for improvement permits will be held for a one -year warranty period, and a release is automatically initiated at the end of that warranty period. Construction Changes: Construction changes prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required for all changes to the approved plans. Requests for construction change approval should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department front counter as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposits. Construc0on change fees of $200.00 and $350.00 will be assessed for minor and major construction changes, respectively. Construction changes necessitating a new plan sheet will be assessed the per -sheet plancheck and NPDES plancheck fees in lieu of the construction change fee. Construction changes not previously approved and submitted as as -built drawings at the end of the construction process will be rejected and the securities release will be delayed. Change of Ownership: If a change of ownership occurs following approval of the drawing(s), the new owner will be required to submit to the City a construction change revising the title sheet of the plan to reflect the new ownership. The construction change shall be submitted to the Engineering front counter as redline mark -ups on two blueline prints of the approved drawing together with two copies of the grant deed or title report reflecting the new ownership. Construction change fees apply. The current owner will be required to post new securities to replace those held by the City under the name of the former owner, and the securities posted by the former owner will be released when the replacement securities have been received and approved by the City. Change of Engineer of Work: If a change in engineer of work occurs following the approval of the drawing(s), a construction change shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Department. Two copies of the forms for the assumption of responsibility by the new engineer and the release of responsibility by the former engineer shall be completed and submitted to the City. Construction change fees apply. As- builts: Project as -built drawings prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required prior to Final Grading acceptance by Engineering Services. Changes to the approved plans require a construction change to be submitted to the City prior to field implementation. Construction changes may not be submitted as as- builts at the end of the construction process. This letter does not change owner or successor -in- interest obligations. If there should be a substantial delay in the start of your project or a change of ownership, please contact the City to request an update. Should you have questions regarding the posting of securities, please contact Debra Geishart, who processes all Engineering securities, at (760) 633 -2779. Should you have any other questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2780 or visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center to speak with an Engineering Technician. Sincerely, Rue tatas Assistant Civil Engineer cc Civil Consulting Group, Michael McCall Debbie Geishart, Engineering Technician Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Masih Maher, Senior Civil Engineer permit/file Eric Application Requirements for Proof of Insurance Security Obligation Information 'l�ni a /D� cr2 APPLICATION NO. ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION JOB SITE ADDRESS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. *2.0 orfo W5 bo.nue, 2.56 - lx{2 -5-1 - DO PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION A 6P,Ila AA1 60,gf M ILIM� NGADDRES$ n2o �� :7p CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE' TELEPHONE NO CIVIL ENGINEER INFORMATION G1V�l Lwlsxd•11_A NA E b TaN. Of. 4-201- DR A E —c7 CA '1711 (b 54- GIrY. TAT ,ZIP TELEPHONE NO REGISTRATION NO CONTRACTOR INFORMI'AT,{O-N� j/D�_J" NA ' -a P>yg Svo-h- AD RESS& , 7be h ti fi s 2fl2'J p, . CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE TELEPHONE NO. STATE LICENSE NO. & TYPE 94Z17- A t 13 SOILS ENGINEER INFORMATION Ez5t Lcvn+1 So, i t*A%11 -�+l w, -- NAM 299 ADD ESS ___ ylfi z58 �ta T STAT Z TELEPHONE NO REGISTRATION NO. DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE ZOE! Z t22 I I 1 DATE SIGNED �N SAIJFo a's O o • V 5 PRINT NAME TELE HONE NO. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW 6w PLANNING CASE NUMBER ID— t i0 FOR GfCADING PLANS: OK FOR PLAN CHECK I:kioskhandouts/Eng/Eng. Dev. App -ta1 V FOR FINAL MAPS /PARCEL MAPS FINAL MAP PARCEL MAP Ra i 1 DATE V J PLANNER I:kioskhandouts/Eng/Eng. Dev. App -ta1 V FOR FINAL MAPS /PARCEL MAPS FINAL MAP PARCEL MAP Ra i 1 DATE ON -SITE DRAINAGE STUDY FOR PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 820 ORPHEUS AVENUE ENCINITAS , CA APN #256 - 242 -57 February 16, 2011 Prepared By: Civil Consulting Group, Inc. 5858 Mount Alifan Drive, Suite 202 San Diego CA, 92111 Phone: 858 -565 -0475 Fax: 858 -565 -0478 CIVIL CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 5858 Mount Alifan Drive, Suite 202, San Diego CA 92111 858 - 565- 0475(Phone) 858 -565- 0478(Fax) February 14, 2011 Attention: Mr. Don Sanford 820 Orpheus Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Subject: On -Site Drainage Study 820 Orpheus Avenue, Encinitas, CA Dear Mr.Sanford : Civil Consulting Group, Inc. (CCG) is pleased to provide this Preliminary Onsite Drainage Study for the above referenced site. This report is required as part of the submittal for your planned commercial - residential development project. Should you have any questions regarding this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Best regards, Michael McCall, President Civil Consulting Group, Inc. (2) Addressee Project: 830 Orpheus Avenue - 2 - 2114111 Civil Consulting Group, 1w. TABLE OF CONTENTS L fKTRODUCnON. . __..........._..4 A. SITE DESCREMON ........................................... . ... . .. . . . ............................. ...... .......... ........................ 4 B. EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS .................................................................................................... 4 C. PROPOSED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS ......................................................... . ....................................... 5 D. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................... 5 IL HYDROLOGY DESIGN MODELS ----7 A. DESIGN METHODS ................................................. . .............................................. . ........ . ....................... 7 B. DESIGN CRITERIA ................................................ . . . .................................................. . ............................ 7 C. REFERENCES ...... -- . . .................... . ...................... . .................. . . ......... ..... . . .. . ... 7 III. CALCULATIONS. -8 A. OVERALL SITE DRAINGE .............................................................. . ................. ...................................... 8 B. PROPOSED ST)ORMDRAIN . . . ........ . .... . ................... ._. »_.__......................9 IV. FIGURES ................................................. . .............. . . ... -.- ...... ---------------------------------- --- in A. VICE41TY MAP ...................................... . ....... .. ... ........ ....... ..... . ................ . . .. . ... . ..................... 10 B. RAINFALL INTENSITY MAPS ....................... ... . ... . ..... . .. ...._._.............._... ......._.....................11 C. COUNTY HYDROLOGY AND DESIGN CHARIM ............... . ...... . ........................ . . ......................... 12 D. DETENTION BASIN DRAINAGE DESIGN ........................................................ ..... . ........................... 13 L STORMWATER TREATMENT DESIGN & DETAILS ........................... . .......... . .. . . .. . . ................ 14 F. DEVICE CAPACITY ANALYSIS - ON SITE DRAINAGE G. WATERSHED MAPS .............................................. . ...................... -- ---- - ---------------------------- - --- to Project: 83D Orpheus Avenue -3. 2114/11 Civil Consulting Group, Im. I. INTRODUCTION A. SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is approximately 0.41 acres and is located at 820 Orpheus Avenue, Encinitas, CA (see Vicinity Map). The project site has an existing single story residential structure, with an existing asphalt driveway that provides access to the Orpheus Avenue. The property is below street elevation(Orpheus Avenue) and slopes towards the west. The proposed project consists of constructing a new single family residence, an accessory unit and on site improvements for residential use. B. EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS Existing and proposed drainage areas and sub areas are shown on the attached watershed maps (Appendix F). The project site is a located west of Orpheus Avenue and south of Leucadia Boulevard. The onsite surface soils are very sandy and percolate water very quickly. The majority of the on -site drainage is absorbed through the soil, the remaining drainage from site flows in a westerly direction as overland flow and drains from the site at the southwest corner The subject property downsloping from Orpheus Avenue and is approximately 6 feet below street level at the existing residence. The site slopes approximately 6 percent to the outlet point. The runoff generated from the existing site is calculated at approx. 1.52 CFS. This value is based upon the 100 year - 6 hour storm event. The `C" values used for the analyses are referenced from the San Diego Hydrology Manual, Table 3 -1. For the pre- developed (existing) on site conditions a "C" value of 0.56 was used for analysis (see calculation in Surface Drainage Analysis). Project: 822 Orpheus Avenue - 4 - 2/14/11 Civil Coom thing Group, inc. C. PROPOSED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS The proposed drainage system will consist of intercepting the generated runoff along south, north and west property lines by a system of drainage rock lined and vegetated swales located at the property edges (see site plan). These swales will also be used as BMP treatment devices. Our design will incorporate the sizing of these swales for anticipated capacity flows and also considering stormwater treatment design requirements for lower flows. Flow from the swale system will he then discharge to a drywell detention basin located at the southwest comer of the site. The dry well will be designed to hold approximately 150 cubic feet of water as detention below the surface. Drainage that is directed to the dry-well will percolate into the subsurface soils at a high infiltration rate. Any excess overflow, generated from 100 year storm event, will bubble at the surface and then sheet flow over a vegetated area towards the outlet point. Flows from the site will follow the existing drainage flows from the site. Drainage from the developed project area will he ultimately directed onto a private driveway located on the downstream neighboring property. This water then flows south along this driveway and ultimately flows to Fluvia Street. The proposed flow from the developed site is calculated to be 0.58 CFS more than existing for a total of 2.10 CFS. (see the attached watershed maps Appendix G). For pre -developed conditions a minimum 0.45 value for "C" was used. For post - developed condition additional values were calculated as shown on the Surface Drainage Analysis for "Residential, 4.3 DU /A or less" (See attached Table 3 -1) land use classification and "Type B" soil. (see the attached watershed maps Appendix G) As part of the planned onsite stormwater management system and as a best management practice, filtration devices will be installed to treat the storm water from the driveway and building areas. These devices will remove the majority of the anticipated pollutants generated from the site for the planned residential use. These devices will effectively treat 0.06 CFS which is the anticipated storm water flow required to be treated based current stormwater treatment design requirements(based on a storm intensity of I = 0.2 in/hr).. D. SUMMARY Project: 870 Orpheus Avenue .5- 2/14/11 The proposed on site drainage flows will be 2.04 CFS. With the utilization of the planned on -site detention basin, there will be no anticipated increase in flows from the site, or foreseen adverse impacts to adjacent properties, water quality or downstream drainage systems as part of this development. Project 810 Orpheus Avenue - 6 - 2114/11 IL HYDROLOGY DESIGN MODELS A. DESIGN METHODS The Rational method is used in this hydrology study using the following formula: Q = CIA, Where: Q = Peak discharge (CFS) C = Runoff Coefficient (dimensionless) (0.45 minimum) Rainfall amounts Year /6 hr. storm event A = Tributary Drainage Area (Acres) Time of concentration calculations are based upon the following formula or 5 minute minimum: For proposed onsite drainage Tc = [ 1.8 *(1.1- C) *(Distance^.5)/ ( %Slope^.333)] minutes B. DESIGN CRITERIA C. Detention Vault Frequency — 100 year storm Storm Water System Frequency — 100 year storm. Land use — Residential, 4.3 DU /A or less. Rainfall Intensity (in/hr) per County of San Diego 2003 Hydrology Design Manual 2003 County of San Diego Hydrology Manual Project: 810 Orpheus Avenue - 7 - 2/14(1 CMI Cmndtmg Group, I=. m. CALCULATIONS A. OVERALL SITE DRAINGE Project: 810 Orpheus Avenue - 8 _ 2/14111 Surface Drainage Analysis 830 Orpheus Avenue Leucadia, CA Precipitation (100 yr) P6 = 2.5 in EXISTING SURFACE DRAINAGE DETERMINE FLOW AT THE DIFFERENT NODES (0) Node Areas Elevation Height No. No. 1 2 It 1 All 166.5 146.0 20.5 Calculate "C' value 1 4547/17993 = 25% 13446117993 = 75% Notes No existing drainage to or from street 11/15/10 (see calculation) Length Grade C tc I Drainage Area sum CA 0 It mi % min in sf ac cfs 300 0.057 6.8% 0.56 5.00 6.6 17993 0.413 0.231 1.52 0.90 x 0.25 = 0.23 0.45 x 0.75 = 0.34 Use C = 0.56 Surface Drainage Analysis 830 Orpheus Avenue Leucadia, CA 02/14/11 Precipdation (100 yr) P6 = 2.5 In (see calculation) PROPOSED SURFACE DRAINAGE DETERMINE FLOW AT THE DIFFERENT NODES (0) Node Areas Elevation Height Length Grade C to I Drainage Area sum CA 0 No. No. 1 2 ft ft mi % min in sf ac cis 1 1 166.5 163.0 3.5 75 0.014 4.7% 0.45 5.00 6.6 519 0.012 0.005 0.04 2 1,2 163.0 149.5 13.5 265 0.050 5.1% 0.82 5.00 6.6 6240 0.143 0.122 0.81 3 1,2,3 149.5 147.5 2.0 47 0.009 4.3% 0.68 5.00 6.6 910 0.021 0.137 0.90 4 1,2,3,4,6 147.5 146.0 1.5 67 0.013 2.2% 0.85 5.00 6.6 6097 0.140 0256 1.69 5 4 166.5 153.0 13.5 188 0.036 7.2% 0.67 5.00 6.6 2051 0.047 0.031 0.21 6 4.5 155.0 146.0 9.0 101 0.019 8.9% 0.60 5.00 6.6 2176 0.050 0.061 0.41 7 1,2,3,4,5,6 Calculate 0 at Node 7 Node 4 + Node 8 - 2,10 17993 0.413 1.52 Retalned - 0.58 2.10 - 1.52 = 0.58 Calculate "C" value 2 5088/6240 = 82% 0.90 x 0.82 = 0.73 1152/6240 = 18% 0.45 x 0.18 = 0.08 Use C - 0.82 3 4701910 = 52% 0.90 x 0.52 = 0.46 440/910 = 48% 0.45 x 0.48 = 0.22 Use C - 0.68 4 5477/6136 = 89% 0.90 x 0.89 = 0.80 659/6136 = 11% 0.45 x 0.11 = 0.05 Use C - 0.85 5 988/2051 - 48% 0.90 x 0.48 - 0.43 1068/2051 = 52% 0.45 x 0.52 - 0.23 Use C - 0.67 6 733/2176 = 34% 0.90 x 0.34 = 0.30 1443/2176 = 86% 0.45 x 0.66 = 0.30 Use C - 0.60 Notes. No existing drainage to or from street IV. FIGURES A. VICINITY MAP Project 810 Orpheus Avenue - 10 - 2114111 B. RAINFALL INTENSITY MAPS Project: 810 Orpheus Avenue - 11 - 2114/11 ; "I :., ��If� C. COUNTY HYDROLOGY AND DESIGN CHARTS Project 820 Orpheus Avenue - 12- 2/14111 i II 2 120 W9 I tDO _\ I 90 \ s0 70 —IM .. - 1 i0 so ` I M NOW Feat ]0 no {I'I F 1 G U R E Narfto6vuw For DetermWKMon of — - u1ne Concentration (re) or Travel Time (TI) for Natural Watersheds 3 -4 7000\ +a I` os 2000 ` ` ,2 it ,000 ` I Iwo 0 ta.a 1 a 7 700 II we s t I{ s00 j� 400 I I j 700 7 :i i� I 200 AE L Tc caNtofta DWImbna WWIMW (19411 am 100d MUM:i {I'I F 1 G U R E Narfto6vuw For DetermWKMon of — - u1ne Concentration (re) or Travel Time (TI) for Natural Watersheds 3 -4 Taber A -1 Table A-1 Avierage Manning Roughness Coa forPayemwt and GuOwz ConcreteGutter.... ....... ............................... ------ -- ...... ........... ..... ... .............. . ......... . .... 0.015 Concrete Pavement FloatFinish .... ........................ _ ..... _._.. »....... .... _ ..... _._.__ ... _ ... _ .................. 0.014 BroomFinish.......... I ............... _ ........ .... t................... ...._ ........ _ ... _ ............................ .... 0.016 Concrete Gutter Asphalt Pavement SmoothFinish ......... ............. 4 ..................... ........ ......... .............. _ ................... 0.015 RoughTexture ....... ............................... ; f........................................... ............................... Q015 Asphalt Pavement Smooth Finish ....... ............................... 0.013 ..................................... ............................... RoughTexture ........................ .............. .., ... ......... ............................ .... .......... 0.018 8�d w FHWA HE —22. �4 I1 i hip required',> y standard specifications. z Increase roughness coefficient in gutters with mild slopes where sediment might accumulate by 0.020. San Diego County Drainage Design Manual (July 2005) Page A -3 i Table A -2 Average Manning Rorer Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) .......... Corrugated Metal Pipe and Pipe Arch 2 -318 x 112 in .]Gomrgetlons Unlined. j ... ............................... Half Lined Full FI w ............. ............. -- -- ------------ ---_.._......._.. d4D<0. 0 .... . .................. .. ......... , Fulty Lined,. . .................................... 3 x 1 inch Corr¢gafiorts _» ......_ »... ».., 6 x 2 inch Com Spiral Rib Pipe _ . .. Helically Wo 18 -inch .. 24 -inch .. ..... .. »... 30- 4nch ..... ..:....:... .. »..:._ _._.. 36 -inch ............ ............................... 42 -inch ..... ...... .........................:..._. 48 -inch ..... Plastic Pipe (HPDE Yld P11C) Smooth................. ............................... Corrugated ..... ......... ................. _ ....... _. Yrtrified Clay Pipe . ........... ........ .............. Cast -iron Pipe (U ......................... SteelPipe ............. .............. _...................... Brick..................... ............... _..................... Cast -In -Place Conclie Pipe Rough Wood Forms . .. ......................... Smooth Wood or Steel Forms .............. i I 711 LVA •. Table A-2 ...........0.013 .................................. ..............................1 0.013 Based on miterisls workm aship regmrod bj saed�rd Wwfficiidom San Diego County Drainage Design Manuel (July 2005) Page A -4 Em 411 r 0.013 0.024 0.014 0.013 0.011 0.017 0.017 0.014 Table A-3 Table A-3 Average Manning Roughtlew Coefficients for Small Open Channeis Conveying Less than 50 084 I Grass Lined MW1401aintainaM ........ . .. ------- ---- ------ - - --- - ..._...._............0.035 Grass Lined (Not Maintained) . ........ Wetland-Bottodn Channels (New Ch ........................................................................ 0.023 Wetland-Bottom Channels (Mature Channel .... . ............. ........ . ............................. See Table A-5 Riprap-Lined Char*iels ............. . . ... . . --.. r_..........._._.._. ......_ ........................ See Section 5.7.2 Concrete(Poured) ......................................... . .... . .......... . ............................................. ........ 0.014 Air Blown Mortar (Ounite or Shotcrele)' ... - : ......... 0.016 . ..................................................................... 0.016 **'I*" -* ... *"*"**** ....... ***'* ..... - ....... -* .......... Asphaltic Concrete or Bituminous Plant Mlx� .... Fnr rh-nneft ifffi miahrents nr M-OP& Ining f")K ii 94WIpowle 111 IN mtgh "soosltiafe,#beadoemrporwk FnkV mtenfd& Based on materials'and workmanship required ly standard specifications. For air-blown con=, use n=0.012 (if troweled) and n=0.025 if purposely roughened. San Diego County Drainage Design Manuel (July 2005) Page A-5 Ile A-4 Design Flow Depth Lining Type O-OR 0.5 - 7-0 ft > 2.0 It Concrete (Poured) 0.0 0.013 0.013 Air Blown Concreft 0.019 0.016 Grouted Riprap 0.00 0.030 0.028 Stone Masonry 0.00 0.032 0.030 Soil Cement 0.0# 0.022 0.020 Bare soil 0.0# 0.020 0.1120 Rock cut 0.035 0.025 Rook Riprap 4!1!Ld an Rock Size (See Section 5.7.2) ti Tab Table A-4 AY "a Manning Roughr see Coefficients for Larger Open Channels Unlined Channels ClayLoam .............................................. .... . ...... . ... Sand....................... ..............................1 0.020 1 Inad rhannaim Grass Lined MW1401aintainaM ........ . .. ------- ---- ------ - - --- - ..._...._............0.035 Grass Lined (Not Maintained) . ........ Wetland-Bottodn Channels (New Ch ........................................................................ 0.023 Wetland-Bottom Channels (Mature Channel .... . ............. ........ . ............................. See Table A-5 Riprap-Lined Char*iels ............. . . ... . . --.. r_..........._._.._. ......_ ........................ See Section 5.7.2 Concrete(Poured) ......................................... . .... . .......... . ............................................. ........ 0.014 Air Blown Mortar (Ounite or Shotcrele)' ... - : ......... 0.016 . ..................................................................... 0.016 **'I*" -* ... *"*"**** ....... ***'* ..... - ....... -* .......... Asphaltic Concrete or Bituminous Plant Mlx� .... Fnr rh-nneft ifffi miahrents nr M-OP& Ining f")K ii 94WIpowle 111 IN mtgh "soosltiafe,#beadoemrporwk FnkV mtenfd& Based on materials'and workmanship required ly standard specifications. For air-blown con=, use n=0.012 (if troweled) and n=0.025 if purposely roughened. San Diego County Drainage Design Manuel (July 2005) Page A-5 Ile A-4 16 -1 8 I 2 ton > 18 I Special Design 5.7.2 Roughness Coefficients The Manning roughness coefficient (n) for ¢ydraulic computations shall be estimated for loose rock riprap using the Manning-Strickler egjianon (Equation 5 -5). Equation 5-5 (Chang, 1992) does not apply to grouted rock riprap or to very shallow flow. Table 5-3 provides Manning roughness coeffacieFnts for standard rock rionip classifications based on the Manning- Strickler method. n = 0.0393d;o6 (5 -5) where ... n = Mijnning roughness coefficidnt (dimensionless); and dso = median stone diameter (feet). Table 6-3 Standard Rock Riprap Gradations Rock Gradation a Median Stone Yleight Median Stone Manning n (WOO) ` Diameter (due) ° (Ungrouted)' No. 3 Beckiro 5 lb 0.4 ft 0.034 No. 2 Backin 25 lb 0.7 ft 0.037 No. 1 Backing ° 75 lb 1.0 ft 0.039 Light 200 lb 1.3 ft 0.041 1/4 Ton 500 lb 1.8 ft 0.044 % Ton 1000 lb 2.3 ft 0.045 1 Ton 2000 lb I 2.9 ft 0.047 2 Ton 4000 lb'I 3.6 ft 0.049 (a) Except M 2 Am c6eie6ctObn is based rim AINwdB FbM w Wvkh etbwe dunp V of the rack and spreading by e090enet Laed - &W ml very lium Ow pbm W grade by more 8ren 1 root measured bore dope. 7lvubn nequtat pdrpeoMwnt use Ce4arrs (2002) or Greenbook rtx mae lnronnanon. (dl Ala I Bad*V hes aemr W Fdit F4WP fql psrQ*1M OVIV). (d) Assumes specfic weight of 165 am The de t SW hkv b apsfya mnt eayhtt W $5 tiFe' 1. b tiro type of riprap specified for the project, end agtct lieicalniatlerr nsOeswry. IRI A on Abrr*V- 9&Idaarre4ehwshgr (Chang, 1986). San Diego County Drainage Design Manual Page 5 -16 Jury 2005 Chapter 5. Open Channels 5.7.1 Longkied n nal Channel Slope The longitudinal l lope of riprap -lined channels shall be dictated by maximum permissible velocity requiremeats. T Table 5 -2 summarizes the maximum permissible velocity for standard riprap gradations. W Where topography is stopper than desirable, drop structures may be used to maintain design ve o ocities (sce Section 5.12 Table 6 -2 Channel B Bottom ROV 'on Design Voloetty T R Rack OnKlation tt/s i 6 -10 N No. 2 Backing 10 -12 I / /4 ton 12 -14 I 5 54 ton 14 -16 i 1 ton i 1 > 18 I Special Design 5.7.2 Roughness Coefficients The Manning roughness coefficient (n) for ¢ydraulic computations shall be estimated for loose rock riprap using the Manning-Strickler egjianon (Equation 5 -5). Equation 5-5 (Chang, 1992) does not apply to grouted rock riprap or to very shallow flow. Table 5-3 provides Manning roughness coeffacieFnts for standard rock rionip classifications based on the Manning- Strickler method. n = 0.0393d;o6 (5 -5) where ... n = Mijnning roughness coefficidnt (dimensionless); and dso = median stone diameter (feet). Table 6-3 Standard Rock Riprap Gradations Rock Gradation a Median Stone Yleight Median Stone Manning n (WOO) ` Diameter (due) ° (Ungrouted)' No. 3 Beckiro 5 lb 0.4 ft 0.034 No. 2 Backin 25 lb 0.7 ft 0.037 No. 1 Backing ° 75 lb 1.0 ft 0.039 Light 200 lb 1.3 ft 0.041 1/4 Ton 500 lb 1.8 ft 0.044 % Ton 1000 lb 2.3 ft 0.045 1 Ton 2000 lb I 2.9 ft 0.047 2 Ton 4000 lb'I 3.6 ft 0.049 (a) Except M 2 Am c6eie6ctObn is based rim AINwdB FbM w Wvkh etbwe dunp V of the rack and spreading by e090enet Laed - &W ml very lium Ow pbm W grade by more 8ren 1 root measured bore dope. 7lvubn nequtat pdrpeoMwnt use Ce4arrs (2002) or Greenbook rtx mae lnronnanon. (dl Ala I Bad*V hes aemr W Fdit F4WP fql psrQ*1M OVIV). (d) Assumes specfic weight of 165 am The de t SW hkv b apsfya mnt eayhtt W $5 tiFe' 1. b tiro type of riprap specified for the project, end agtct lieicalniatlerr nsOeswry. IRI A on Abrr*V- 9&Idaarre4ehwshgr (Chang, 1986). San Diego County Drainage Design Manual Page 5 -16 Jury 2005 Table 5-13 M�x mum Permissible VL for Lined and Unlined Channels Material or Natural and Impn Fine Sand, Colloid Sandy Loam, Non Sift Loam, Noncoll Alluvial Sifts, Nonc Ordinary Firm Loa Volcanic Ash ......., Stiff Clay, Very Cc Alluvial Silts, Calla Shales And Hardp Fine Gravel.........., Graded Loam To ( Graded Silts To C4 Coarse Gravel, Nc Cobbles And Shim Sandy Silt ............ Silty Clay .............. Clay...................... Poor Sedimentary Fully-Lined Char Unreinforced Vag Reinforced Turf . Loose Riprap ..... Grouted Riprap .. Gabions ............. Soil Cement ......., Concrete ............, id Unlin" Channels ..... . .............................. : s When i When C dal ........ Moubmw Permissible Awl Veloc ty' (f hw) 1.50 6 .................. ............................... ...........................1.75 ...... ... _ ...... _ ......................... ............................... 2.00 F......... . .................................. ............................... 2.00 ........................................ ............................... 2.50 ........... ..... ................._......... ............................... 2.50 ....... _..._ ....... _ ...... _ ................. »..._ ....... _.......... 3.75 ..»...... .. ......................................... _ ... 3.75 ............ .... _ ................. ............................... 6.00 ......... .................. ............................... 2.50 ..._..,._. ... _._ ......................... ......... »... 3.75 l...._ ....... »..... ....... ». ....................... ..._............. 4.00 ..... .. .... .... .. ......... _ ............ ................................. . 4.00 ......... _ ............................ _ .................................... 5.00 .....................2.00 .... ..._....... _. __._......_ ........ ...........................2.50 ..................... .. ..... _ ..... .. ... .. ........ .......................... 6.00 .................. ............................... ...........................10.0 .... ........... .. .... _ .... _ ............... _ ....... _....................... 5.0 ........10.0 Table 5-2 ........ 25.0 ........15.0 ........15.0 ........35.0 Mex#MM MMoc WMWdMM fs Ossic VAr **, hWwdssW robe's" nay bo umd, Wun W Ww*rMIe ftdw itvf _ iarMrrAra- , , San Diego Countybrainage Design Manual' Page 5 -43 July 2005 San Diego County Hydrology Manual Date: June 2003 Table 3 -1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR URBAN AREAS Section: 3 Page: 6 of 26 son Dye ntc-�, r.tements C County Elements % % i OML A A B B C C D D Undisturbed Natural Termin (Natural) P Permanent Open Space 0 0' 0 0.20 0 0.25 D D30 0 0.35 Low Density Residential (LDR) R Residential, 1.0 DU /A or less 1 10 0 0.27 0 0.32 0 036 0 0.41 Low Density Residential (LDR) R Residential, 2.0 DU /A or less 2 20 0 0.34 0 0.38 0 0.42 0 0.46 Low Density Residet#id_�LDR} _ _ Residential, 2_9 DUlA or less. 0 0.41 *The values associated with 0% impervious may be used for direct calculation of the runoff coefficient as described in Section 3.1.2 (representing the pervious runoff coefficient, Cp, for the soil type), or for areas that will remain undisturbed in perpetuity. Justification most be given that the area will remain natural forever (e.g., the area is located in Cleveland National Forest). DU /A = dwelling units per acre NRCS = National Resources Conservation Service I l✓ -TLti r_ B 3-6 I e hit ='s SAGIS 7 0 3 Mks F es6e" 10( LL z 0 x W Q 3 EXAMPLE: Given: Watercourse Distance (D) = 70 Feet Slope (s) =1.3 % Runoff Coefficient (C) = 0.41 Overland Flow Time (T) = 9.5 Minutes SOURCE: Airport Drainage, Federal Aviation Administration, 1965 T_1.8(1.1 -C)V—D IV—S Rational Formula - Overland Time of Flow Nomograph 20 z Lij 10 F I G U R E 3m3 MWAVF FAF f r 1 R�� EXAMPLE: Given: Watercourse Distance (D) = 70 Feet Slope (s) =1.3 % Runoff Coefficient (C) = 0.41 Overland Flow Time (T) = 9.5 Minutes SOURCE: Airport Drainage, Federal Aviation Administration, 1965 T_1.8(1.1 -C)V—D IV—S Rational Formula - Overland Time of Flow Nomograph 20 z Lij 10 F I G U R E 3m3 D. DETENTION BASIN DRAINAGE DESIGN Project. Bb Orpheus Avenue - 13 - 2114111 I MI Eva Poll � ilMiNst!!!�r!!!�ili�Ei;. Ii!!!!liiiiv Emmaims Zvi: fro v �uiil�3�rio!!!! ®!� niMom 0�l�uli�it�n E. STORMWATER TREATMENT DESIGN & DETAILS Project 8U Orpheus Avenue - 14 - 2/1411 F. DEVICE CAPACITY ANALYSIS - ON SITE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Projecl: 810 Orpheus Avenue - 15- 2114/11 S GRASS SWALE Worksheet for Triangular Channel Project Description Project File c:\haestad\fmw\pipe.fm2 Worksheet VEGETATED SWALE Flow Element Triangular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.045 Channel Slope 0.010000 f tft Left Side Slope 2.500000 H : V Right Side Slope 2.500000 H : V Discharge 1.38 cfs Results Depth 0.62 ft Flow Area 0.96 ft' Wetted Perimeter 3.34 ft Top Width 3.10 ft Critical Depth 0.45 ft Critical Slope 0.053471 fttft Velocity 1.44 ft/s Velocity Head 0.03 ft Specific Energy 0.65 ft Froude Number 0.46 Flow is subcritical. 11/16110 FlowMaster v5. 13 03 11 51 PM Haestad Methods. Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755.1666 Page 1 of 1 oee L 4 m D Z C C l8 L L Curve Plotted Curves for Triangular Channel Project Description Project File c:lhaestad\fmw\pipe.fm2 Worksheet VEGETATED SWALE Flow Element Triangular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Constant Data Channel Slope 0,010000ft1ft Left Side Slope 2.500000 H : V Right Side Slope 2.500000 H : V Discharge 1.38 cfs Data Minimum Maximum Increment Mannings Coefficient 0.010 0100 0.005 Channel Depth vs Mannings Coefficient 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 Mannings Coefficient 11116/10 FlowMaster v5. 13 0312:10 PM Haeslad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 05708 (203) 7557866 Page 1 of 1 STONE SWALE Worksheet for Triangular Channel Project Description Project File c:lhaestadlfmwlpipe.fm2 Worksheet STONE SWALE Flow Element Triangular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.037 Channel Slope 0.010000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 2.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 2.000000 H : V Discharge 1.38 cfs Results Depth 0.63 ft Flow Area 0.80 ft' Wetted Perimeter 2.83 ft Top Width 2.53 ft Critical Depth 0.49 ft Critical Slope 0.036882 tuft Velocity 1.73 ft/s Velocity Head 0.05 ft Specific Energy 0.68 ft Froude Number 0.54 Flow is subcritical. 11118/10 FlowMaster v5.13 03:04'50 PM Haeslad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203)75s.1666 Page i of 1 DD 0 0 Curve Plotted Curves for Triangular Channel Project Description Project File c lhaestadlf nwlpipe.fm2 Worksheet STONE SWALE Flow Element Triangular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth Constant Data Mannings Coefficient 0.037 Left Side Slope 2.000000 H : V Right Side Slope 2.000000 H : V Discharge 1.38 cfs Minimum Maximum Increment Channel Slope 0.010000 0.050000 0.005000ft/ft Channel Depth vs Channel Slope 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045 0.05 Channel Slope (fttft) 11/16!10 FIo Master v5.13 03 04 .04 PM Haestad Methods, Jr 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 7551666 Page 1 of 1 Civil Consulting Group. Inc. G. WATERSHED MAPS Project: 820 Orpheus Avenue -16- 2/14/11 AREA 1 1 14,6.03' "E 664 SIF 1 'A sF 1 '/ /� s Il 192JSF o ENO, sz pr. 1 / i ( r � 3oa.o• � EXISTING WATERSHED MAP Scut r. ,n NORTH LEGEND: DRAINAGE BASIN SIMM) NY (TYP) NODE (TYP) ANODE , EXISTING ROW LINE E.. SEE DRAINAGE STUDY ANALYSIS FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS NODE 3 0 -0.90 cfe NODE 2 0 -0.81 cfs N76'03SCE 3000' NODE 1 0 -0.04 cfe t^ AR_ OF AREA 2 6240 SF m EA 6 1 Q AREA 1 mam 1 8 SF PAW 2 519 SF ' z NODE 4 .t • T W -1.69 cfe = \ Cl DETENTION 2051A SF ASIN onnswAY AREA 4 8097 SF A1- NODE 6 NODE 7 0-0.41 cfe '\-NODE 5 N76. 03'54 "E 3000' 0 h 1.52 c 0-0.21 c}e PROPOSED WATERSHED MAP SCALE 1'- 10 NORTH LEGEND: DRANAGE BASIN BOUNDARY (TYP) NODE (Tw) -NODE 1 PROPOSED FLOW LINE SEE DRAINAGE STUDY ANALYSIS FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS civil Consulting Group, Inc. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND, LAND SURVEYORS Date: January 23rd, 2012 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Engineer's Final Grading Certification for Grading Permit Number 10799 -G. The grading under permit number 10799 -G been performed in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan or as shown on the attached 'As Graded' plan. Final grading inspection has demonstrated that lot drainage conforms to the approved grading plan and that swales drain at a minimum of 1 % to the street and /or an appropriate drainage system. All the Low Impact Development, Source Control and Treatment Control Best Management Practices as shown on the drawing and required by the Best Managervwrt PEactige Manual Part II were constructed and are operational, together with the required_AlAimte6ii664.CoyWaant(s). Engineer of Record Dated :January 23rd 2012 Verification by the Engineering Inspector of this fact is done by the Inature hereon and will take place only after the above is signed and stamped and will not relieve the Engineer of Record of the ultimate responsibility: Engineering Inspector: Dated: 5858 Mount Alifan Drive, Suite 202, San Diego, CA 92111 Tel: 858.565.0475 ext 201 — Fax: 858.565.0478 mm@civilconsultinginc.com