Loading...
2011-10853 GLine: 6,L 3 C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 10853 GI ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARCEL NO. : 258- 342 -1700 JOB SITE ADDRESS: 1255 SAN DIEGUITO DR APPLICANT NAME DAKOTA LAND LLC MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 313 CITY: ENCINITAS STATE: CA ZIP CONTRACTOR : LIVINGSTON CONSTRUCTION LICENSE NO.: 471091 ENGINEER PERMIT _ISSUE`Dr°TE 6 14/11 PERMIT E _ "DATE: 6/> INSPECTO TODD BAUMBACH ------------------------- PERMIT PERMIT ISSUED BY FEES & DEPOSITS PLAN NO.: CASE NO.: PHONE NO.: 858- 461 -4162 92024- PHONE NO.: 760 -580 -4524 LICENSE TYPE: B PHONE 1. PERMIT FEE 300.00 2. GIS MAP FEE .00 3. INSPECTION FEE 3,620.08 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 5. NPDES INSPT FEE 724.02 6. SECURITY DEPOSIT 72,401.50 7. FLOOD CONTROL FE .00 8. TRAFFIC FEE .00 9. IN -LIEU UNDERGRN .00 IO.IN -LIEU IMPROVMT .00 11.PLAN CHECK FEE .00 12.PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 ------------- ------ - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF UORK ----- ------------------- - - - - -- PERMIT TO GUARANTEE BOTH PERFORMANCE AND LABOR /MATERIALS FOR EARTHWORK, DRAINAGE, PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS AND EROSION CONTROL. CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN TRAFFIC CONTROL AT ALL TIMES PER W.A.T.C.H. STANDARDS OR APPROVED PLAN. LETTER DATED JUNE 3, 2011 REVISED JUNE 7, 2011 APPLIES. - - -- INSPECTION ---------- - - - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S 1 _2 -J I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. gkcofU Laid PLC f _ SIGNATURE ftevth �'s" ¢u- PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: i lOWNER ) 2. AGENT 3. OTHER 0(�" ly, -) oll DATE SIGNED F59;, X16 /, �/b Z TELEPHONE NUMBER Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & In>p, -41� PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, REEDER RESIDENCE, 1255 SAN DIEGUITO ROAD, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 (D)` ``u v ED 1 L JUN 1 4 2011 PREPARED FOR: DES Mr. Steven Reeder Dakota Land, LLC P.O. Box 313 Cardiff, California 92007 -0313 PREPARED BY: Technical Field Services, Inc. 1199 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 March 28, 2011 Project No. 4225 1199 Tamarack ANenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434 -2617 Technical Field Services, Inc. CiNil Engineering & Inspection March 28, 2011 Project No. 4225 Mr. Steven Reeder P.O. Box 313 Cardiff, California 92007 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations, Reeder Residence, Lot 17 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas, California 92024 lU7.Mu17TIT, = Transmitted herewith is our Preliminary Geotechnical Report for the subject project, dated March 28, 2011. The proposed project will be a two story home with a basement, constructed with ICF materials. The soils evaluation services as authorized by you includes: site evaluation of existing soils, laboratory testing for expansive potential, soils classification, moisture- density relationship, and recommendation for foundation design and construction This report presents our field operations, results of our field and labordfory tests and recommendations. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and look forward to continued involvement with your project. Should you have questions, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, No. C GM Exp:q/30/11 Principal CP /rs Distribution: (2)Addressee 1199 Tamarack .A%enue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434 -2617 Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas March 28, 2011 Project No. 4225 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... ............................... 1 2. SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... ............................... 1 3. SUMMARY OF FIELD EVALUATION .................................................. ............................... 1 4. FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING ................................................. ............................... 1 5. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ........................................................................... ............................... 1 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................... ............................... 2 7. LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................... ..............................4 8. SELECTED REFERENCES .................................................................... ............................... 5 lllustrations Figure 1 — Site Location Map Tables Table 1 — Moisture- Density Test Results Table 2 — Expansion Potential Test Results Appendix Appendix A — Recommended Earthwork Specifications +us nam can i Reeder Residence March 28, 2011 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Project No. 4225 1. INTRODUCTION In response to your request and authorization, we have provided geotechnical evaluation and testing services for the proposed project. The purposes of our services were to evaluate existing soils and provide recommendations for construction of a two story home addition of approximately 5100 s.f.. We performed field and laboratory tests of representative material samples to evaluate suitability of the existing underlying soils at the site. Our findings and conclusions are presented herein. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located at 1255 San Dieguito Drive, within the City of Encinitas in San Diego County. The site is bound by San Dieguito Drive to the West, residential property to the South, North, and EasL The site is relatively level, and has no existing structures. 3. SUMMARY OF FIELD EVALUATION Our engineers conducted the field investigation on December 28, 2006. Soils encountered con- sisted of fine to medium to brown silty Sand (topsoil) (SM), classified as fill to a depth of 18 inches, below grade. At 18 inches to 8 feet in depth, competent formational soils were encoun- tered consisting of medium cemented light brown Sandstone with fines classified as San Pedro Formation marine terrace deposits. Soil samples were taken for laboratory testing within the pro- posed new construction area Soils were probed and found to be firm and of high density. Soils were visually and texturally classified according to the field identification procedures set forth in the Uniform Soils Classification System. 4. FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on a representative sample of the existing material to evaluate expansion potential, and optimum moisture- density relationship. The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D1557 -01, and the results are presented in Table 1. Expansion potential test was performed in general accor- dance with UBC Standard 18 -2, and the results are presented in Table 2. Groundwater was not encountered during the course of our investigation. Groundwater is antici- pated at a depth greater than 15 feet. We do not anticipate groundwater to affect the proposed development. 5. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS A review of available geologic hazards pertaining to the site indicates the existence of the Elsi- nore fault zone approximately 50 miles to the northeast, the Newport- Coronado fault and the Rose Canyon fault zone approximately 15 miles to the South of the site. These faults, or any other major active faults in the region have the potential to produce moderate to strong ground Technical RNA Services. Inc. Reeder Residence March 28, 2011 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Project No. 4225 shaking. It is likely that the site will experience the effects of at least one moderate to large mag- nitude earthquake during the life of the proposed structure. We used the computer program Seismic Hazards Curves and Uniform Hazard Response Spectra, provided by the USGS to compute the seismic design criteria in accordance with the 2010 Cali- fornia Building Code (2010 CBC; Based on the 2009 International Building Code [IBC]), Chapter 16 Stuctural Design, Section 1613 Earthquake Loads. Table 3 below summarizes site - specific design criteria obtained from the 2007 California Building Code. The short spectral re- sponse uses a period of 0.2 seconds TABLE 3 SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS Parameter Value IBC-09 Reference Site Class D Table 1613.5.2 Spectral Response — Class D (short), Sg 1. 120g Figure 1613.5(3) Spectral Response — Class D 1 sec Si 0.38g Figure 1613.5(4) Site Coefficient, F. 1.05 Table 1613.5.3(l) Site Coefficient, F. 1.64 Table 1613.5.3 (2) Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration (short), Sm 1.176 Section 1613.5.3 (Eqn 16-37) Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration 1 sec.), Smi 1.312 Section 1613.5.3 (Eqn 16-38) 5% Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration (short), Sa: 0.784 Section 1613.5.4 (Eqn 16-39) 5% Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration 1 sec), Sal 0.875g Section 1613.5.4 (Eqn 16-40) I 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our observations and the results of our field and laboratory tests, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for construction of the proposed addition to the residential structure, provided the recommendations included herein are implemented in design and construction. The proposed structure falls under Seismic Use Group 1. The Site Class D is assigned based on the existing soil profile. The Seismic Design Category D analysis procedures as identified in CBC Table 1616.6.3 shall be used in design. A value of 150 psf for lateral bearing capacity may be used. The equivalent fluid pressure of 55 pcf should be used for retaining wall design, with a friction coefficient of 0.25 against lateral sliding. Based on the consistency of soil deposits, and the absence of shallow groundwater, it is our opin- ion that the potential for liquifaction is very low. Vechnkal FMd Swdcok In. Reeder Residence March 28, 2011 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Project No. 4225 Grading And Earthwork The site shall be cleared of all debris and deleterious materials. The surface soils within the ga- rage and casita areas extending to a maximum depth of 36 inches, and a minimum of 5 feet outside of the building footprint, shall be scarified, moisture conditioned to within 2% of opti- mum, and compacted to a minimum of 90% relative density. Considering the basement excavation and exterior wall backfill, the casita portion of the main home footprint should be graded after construction of the basement. Basement excavations may be made with no more than 5 feet vertical cut, with remaining depth requiring 1:1 cut slope above 5 feet. Soils should generally stand without additional shoring. Grading shall be performed in accordance with stan- dard grading procedures outlined in the appendix A, and minimum requirements of the City of Encinitas. Foundation and Slab Continuous footings and/or spread footings are suitable for use for the proposed two story structure, provided they are founded within the following minimums: Basement wall footings should be founded 24" into existing material at limits of excavation. Spread footings and grade beams shall extend a minimum of 24 inches below adjacent grade. Continuous footings for the casita shall be a minimum of 18 inches in depth, and15 inches in width, and shall be reinforced with a minimum of 2 #4 bars, 3 inches clear from the bottom of footing, and 2 # 4 bars within 3 inches of the top of footings. Garage footings shall be minimum 12" below grade, and founded in compacted fill. It is recommended that concrete be a minimum of 2500 psi for footings and slabs, and 3000 psi for spread footings and grade beams.. Concrete floor slabs shall be a minimum of 4 inches true thickness with reinforcement consist- ing of #3 bars placed at 18 inches on center each way. Slab reinforcement shall be placed within the middle third of the slab by supporting the steel on chairs or "doby" blocks. Slab reinforce- ment should extend a minimum of 6 inches into perimeter footings. Garage slabs may be constructed independent of the garage perimeter footings. The effect of concrete shrinkage will result with cracks developing through the slab. This effect is common to all concrete, and may be reduced by placing the fresh concrete at a maximum slump of 4 inches. The minimum steel rec- ommended is not intended to prevent or reduce shrinkage cracks. Prior to slab placement, the sub -grade should be prepared with 2 inches of clean granular sand, followed by a minimum of 10 -mil thick moisture barrier, and overlain by 2 inches of clean sand. Footings and slab areas to receive concrete should be pre- saturated to optimum moisture 24 hours prior to and wetted just prior to concrete placement. An allowable soils bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot may be used when designing continuous and spread footings founded a minimum of 18 inches into firm natural formation. This value may be increased by 201/6 for each additional foot of depth to a maximum value of 4500 pounds per square foot, as set forth in the 2010 C.B.C. table 1804.2. Yechnkud Field Services, loa. Reeder Residence March 28, 2011 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Project No. 4225 It is anticipated that over time, the underlying soils have a potential for settlement of no more than 1/8 inch, and potential for differential settlements of as much as 1 /8 inch. Drainage Adequate measures shall be implemented to properly finish grade the site after the structure and other improvements are in place, such that the drainage water within the site and adjacent properties is directed away from the foundations, footings floor slabs and the tops of slopes by the use of swales and subsurface drains towards the natural drainage of the lot. Proper surface and subsurface drains shall be used and maintained to minimize the potential of water seeking the level of bearing soils under the foundations, footings and floor slabs. Planting and watering within 18 inches of the structure is not recommended, however may be implemented with proper drainage and limiting water within the 18 inch perimeter zone. 7. LIMITATIONS The geotechnical services outlined in this report have been conducted in accordance with current practice and the standard of care exercised by geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the observations and conclusions expressed in this report. The reported test results represent values at the locations tested. It is important to note that the precision of field and laboratory tests is not exact and variations should be expected. The re- ported locations and elevations of the tests are estimated based on correlations with the site plans. Further accuracy is not implied. Technical Field Services, Inc. Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas & SELECTED REFERENCES March 28, 2011 Project No. 4225 City of San Diego, 2007, Supplement Amendments to the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, San Diego, Document No. 769818, dated February 2. California Building Code, 2010, Volume 2, Structural Engineering Design Provisions. Teehnksl ReN Services, Inc. Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Table 1 — Maximum Density Test Results March 28, 2011 Project No. 4255 Material Initial Maximum Optimum T No. Type Description Dry Density Moisture Content Moisture (pcf) ( %) 1 Brown Sand with silts(SM) 127.1 9.0 Table 2 — Expansion Index Test Results 43 5 Ra Ua Initial Final Expansion Material Type No. Index Moisture Moisture 1 7.0% 12.2% 0 -20 -very low 43 5 Ra Ua APPENDIX A RECOMN ENTI)ED EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS 1. General Description The intent of these specifications is to obtain uniformity and adequate strength in filled ground so that the proposed structures may be safely supported. The procedures include the clearing and preparation of the land to be filled, processing the fill soils, the spreading, and compaction of the filled areas to conform with the lines and grades as shown on the approved plans The owner shall retain a Civil Engineer qualified in soil mechanics (herein referred to as engineer) to inspect and test earthwork in accordance with these specifications. The engineer shall advise the owner and grading contractor immediately if any unsatisfactory conditions are observed to exist and shall have the authority to reject the compacted filled ground until such time that corrective measures are taken, necessary to comply with the specifications. It shall be the sole responsibility of the grading contractor to achieve the specified degree of compaction. 2. Preparing Areas to be Filled (a) All brush, vegetation and any biodegradable refuse shall be removed or otherwise disposed of so as to leave the areas to be filled fret: of vegetation and debris_ Any uncompacted filled ground or loose compressible natural ground shall be removed unless the report recommends otherwise. Any buried tanks or other structures shall be removed and the depression backfilled to the satisfaction of the engineer. (b) The natural ground which is determined to be satisfactory for the support of the filled ground shall then be plowed or scarified to a depth of at least 12 inches (12 "). (c) After the natural ground has been prepared, it shall then be brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM D1557 -91. (d) Where fills are made on slopes greater than 20 percent, horizontal benches shalt be cut into the firm natural round. The initial bench at the toe of the fill shall be at least 15 feet in width on firm undisturbed natural ground. The width of all succeeding benches shall be at least 6 feet. APPENDIX A ?. Fill Materials 2 All material shall be approved by the engineer and shall consist of materials free from vegetable matter, and other lumps greater than 6 inches in diameter. If, during grading operations, soils are found which were not encountered and tested in the preliminary investigation, tests on these soils shall be performed to determine their physical characteristics. Any special treatment recommended in the preliminary or subsequent soils reports not covered herein shall become an addendum to these specifications. 4_ Placing and Compacting Fill Marerials (a) When the moisture content of the 511 material is below that specified, water shall be added until the moisture content is near optimum to assure uniform mixing and effective compaction. (b) When the moisture content of the till materials is above that specified. the fill material shall be aerated by blading and scarifying or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is near optimum as specified. (c) After processine_ the suitable fill materials shall be placed in layers which, when compacted, shall not exceed sir inches (6 "). Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed during the spreading insure uniformity- of materials and moisture in each layer. (d) After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted to not less than the density set forth in paragraph 2 (c) above. Compaction shall be accomplished with approval types of compaction equipment. Rolling shall be accomplished while the till material is at the specified moisture content. In place density tests shall be performed in accordance with ASTM DIi56 -90. (e) The surfaces of the fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. Compacting operations shall be continued until the slopes are stable and until there is no appreciable amount of loose soil on the slopes. 5. Inspection Sufficient inspection by our firm or the Soil's Engineer of record and/or hisiher representative shall be maintained during the filling and compacting operations so that he/she can verify that the fill was constructed in accordance with the accepted specifications. 6. Seasonal Limits No till material shall be placed, sprcad, or rollcd if weather conditions increase the moisture content above permissible limits. When the work is interrupted by rain, fill operations shall not he resumed until the moisture content and density of fill are as previously specified. All recommendations presented in the attached report are a part of these specifications. Revised June 7, 2011 June 3, 2011 Dakota Land, LLC. Attn: Steven Reeder PO Box 313 Cardiff, CA 92007 Re: Permit issuance requirements for: Application 10853 -G Case # 11 -029 CDP Site Address: 1255 San Dieguito Dr. APN: 258- 342 -17 This letter summarizes the requirements for pulling your Engineering Permit for drawing 10853 -G. Your approved plan will remain valid for six months. If the permit is not issued within six months from the date of approval of the drawings, the plans will be subject to review by City staff for compliance with current codes and regulations before a permit can be issued, and changes to the approved plans as well as additional fees may be required. Additionally, work covered by an Engineering permit shall commence within 90 days of the permit issuance or the permit shall become invalid. Engineering permits expire following 90 days of inactivity on the work covered by the permit. Please read through this letter carefully and contact the City with any questions you may have. It contains information about many requirements that may apply to your project and can make the process clearer and easier for you. In order to obtain the permits to construct the work shown on your approved plans, you will need to satisfy the requirements below. All of the items listed below must be submitted to the Engineering front counter in one complete package at the time the applicant comes in to pull the Permit. Partial submittals of any kind will not be accepted. Your project planchecker will not accept any of the documents listed on behalf of the Engineering front counter staff; all items must be submitted to the front counter directly together and at one time. The correct number of each of the requested documents must be provided; copies of documents submitted to the City during plancheck do not reduce the necessary quantities listed below. (1) Provide 4 print sets of the approved drawing 10853 -G Provide 2 copies of "Preliminary Geotechnical Report, Proposed Reeder Family Residence" prepared by Technical Field Services and dated March 30, 2011. Submit 2 copies of the approved, signed (not draft) Resolution of Approval or Notice of Decision for Planning Case # 11 -029 CDP, to be routed by the City to inspector and file. (2) Post Security Deposits to guarantee all of the work shown on your approved drawings. The amounts of security deposits are determined directly from the Approved Engineer's Cost Estimate generated by your engineer according to a set of predetermined unit prices for each kind of work shown on your plans. You will be required to post security deposit(s) as follows: (a) Security Deposit for Grading Permit 10853 -G: in the amount $72.401.50 to guarantee both performance and labor/ materials for earthwork, drainage, private improvements, and erosion control. (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) N/A A minimum of 20% and up to 100% of the amount listed in item(s) 2(a) must be in the form of cash, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Up to 80% of the amount listed in item 2(a) may be in the form of auto - renewing Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Up to 100% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(b), 2(c), and /or 2(d) may be in the form of auto - renewing Labor and Materials bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Cash, certificates of deposit, letters of credit, and assignments of account are also acceptable financial instruments. If a certificate of deposit (CD) will be obtained to secure the entire amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a) and/or 2(b), two separate CD's for 25% and 75% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a) and /or 2(b) should be obtained in order to facilitate any future partial release of those securities. CD's posted may be of any term but must be auto - renewing and must specify the City of Encinitas as a certificate holder and include a clause that until the City of Encinitas provides a written request for release of the CD., the balance shall be available to the City upon its sole request. The format of any financial instrument is subject to City approval, may be in the owner's name only, and must list the City of Encinitas as a Certificate Holder. For anv questions regarding how to post securities bonding, or the required format of securities, please contact Debra Geishart at 760- 633 -2779. (3) Pay non - refundable fees as listed below: Fee Type Amount Grading Inspection $3,620.08 NPDES Inspection (Grading) 724.02 Right-of-Way Construction Permit $300.00 The grading and improvement inspection fees are calculated based on 5% of first $100,000.00 of the approved Engineer's cost estimate dated April 25, 2011 and 3% of the cost estimate over $100,000.00. The NPDES inspection fee is assessed as 1% of the first $100,000.00 of the approved Engineer's cost estimate and 0.6% of the cost estimate over $100,000.00. The flood control fee is assessed at a rate of $0.21 per square foot of net new impervious surface area for driveway and parking areas as created per the approved plan. (4) Provide the name, address, telephone number, state license number; and license type of the construction contractor. The construction of any improvements within the public right -of -way or public easements is restricted to qualified contractors possessing the required state license as listed in the table below. The contractor must also have on file with the City current evidence of one million dollar liability insurance listing the City of Encinitas as co- insured. Additional requirements are described in the handout "Requirements for Proof of Insurance" available at the Engineering front counter. (5) (6) Type Description Work to be Done A General Engineering any & all C -8 Concrete a ron /curb! utter /ram !sidewalk C -10 Electrical li htin isi nals C -12 Grading & Paving any surface, certain drain- basins/channels C -27 Landscaping planting/irrigation/fencing & other amenities C -29 Masonry retaining walls C -32 Parking &Highway Improvement signageistriping /safety C -34 Pipeline sanitary sewer /storm drain Permits are valid for no more than one year from the date of issuance and may expire earlier due to expirations of letter of credit and /or insurance policies. This project does not propose land disturbance in excess of one acre and is exempt from the State Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) requirement. An erosion control plan shall be implemented per the approved grading plan. Preconstruction Meeting: A preconstruction meeting at the project site is mandatory for all projects. The preconstruction meeting may not be scheduled until the Engineering permit(s) have been issued, and the applicant /contractor must give the assigned Engineering inspector a minimum of 48 hours advance notice prior to the scheduled meeting time. Right -of -Way Construction Permit: A separate right -of -way construction permit will be required for any work in the public right -of -way or public easements. Typically, this work may include construction or reconstruction of a portion of the driveway within the public right -of -way, excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install electric, gas, telephone, and cable television lines, or water and sewer connections. A permit fee of $300.00 per application and a site plan, preferably the work order issued by the public utility, will be required. Contractor license and insurance requirements apply. Permits must be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the start of work. Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits: These separate permits may be required for your project and are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division. A fee of $250.00 is required for traffic control plans. For more details, contact Raymond Guarnes, Engineering Technician, at (760) 633 -2704. Release of Project Securities: The partial or complete release of project securities is initiated automatically by the ON after submission of satisfactory as -built drawings to the Citv and approval by the oroiect Engineerina inspector. Applicant requests cannot be addressed without release approval from the oroiect inspector. The processing and release of securities may take up to 4 weeks after the release process is initiated by the project Engineering inspector. Any cash releases will be mailed to the address on this letter unless the City is otherwise notified, and all letters mailed to a financial institution will be copied to the owner listed hereon. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection certified by the project Engineering inspector is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposit assigned to any Grading Permit. A sum in the amount of 25% of the securities posted for improvement permits will be held for a one -year warranty period, and a release is automatically initiated at the end of that warranty period. Construction Changes: Construction changes prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required for all changes to the approved plans. Requests for construction change approval should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department front counter as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposits. Construction change fees of $200.00 and $350.00 will be assessed for minor and major construction changes, respectively. Construction changes necessitating a new plan sheet will be assessed the per -sheet plancheck and NPDES plancheck fees in lieu of the construction change fee. Construction changes not previously approved and submitted as as -built drawings at the end of the construction process will be rejected and the securities release will be delayed. Change of Ownership: If a change of ownership occurs following approval of the drawing(s), the new owner will be required to submit to the City a construction change revising the title sheet of the plan to reflect the new ownership. The construction change shall be submitted to the Engineering front counter as redline mark -ups on two blueline prints of the approved drawing together with two copies of the grant deed or title report reflecting the new ownership. Construction change fees apply. The current owner will be required to post new securities to replace those held by the City under the name of the former owner, and the securities posted by the former owner will be released when the replacement securities have been received and approved by the City. Change of Engineer of Work: If a change in engineer of work occurs following the approval of the drawing(s), a construction change shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Department. Two copies of the forms for the assumption of responsibility by the new engineer and the release of responsibility by the former engineer shall be completed and submitted to the City. Construction change fees apply. As- builts: Project as -built drawings prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required prior to Final Grading acceptance by Engineering Services. Changes to the approved plans require a construction change to be submitted to the City prior to field implementation. Construction changes may not be submitted as as- builts at the end of the construction process. This letter does not change owner or successor -in- interest obligations. If there should be a substantial delay in the start of your project or a change of ownership, please contact the City to request an update. Should you have questions regarding the posting of securities, please contact Debra Geishart, who processes all Engineering securities, at (760) 633 -2779. Should you have any other questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2867 or visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center to speak with an Engineering Technician. Sincerely, Steven Nowak Assistant Civil Engineer cc Christopher Pinnow, Engineer of Work Debbie Geishart, Engineering Technician Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Masih Maher, Senior Civil Engineer permit/file Enc Application Requirements for Proof of Insurance Security Obligation Information Technical Field Services, Inc. ON it Gnpineering & Inspection 11 April 25, 2011 M ",Y 1 1 2011 I _ Subject: Cost estimate for Grading, Public Improvements, BIMP'sand site - -- improvements for proposed residence, 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas CA 92024 The following is a cost estimate for site improvement to meet city standards for grading plan 10853 -G, through completion of building pad and site improvements. Pricing is based on current City of Encinitas unit pricing. ITEM QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL GRADING Clear & Grub 8555 SF $00.45 $3,850.00 Excavation & Export 562 CY $27.50 $15,455.00 Excavate & Fill 250 CY $20.00 $5,000.00 Sub - drains (infltrtn) 175 LF $28.00 $4,900.00 BMP'S Grass -swale 500 SF $10.00 $5,000.00 Jute Mate 450 SF $00.40 $180.00 Silt Fence 210 LF $01.60 $336.00 Fiber Rolls 50 LF $02.25 $1 12.50 Stablized cnstc ent. 100 SF $5.25 $525.00 Concrete Washout t EA $500.00 $500.00 MISC. Driveway Apron 160 SF $7.00 $1,120.00 Trench resurfacing 35 LF $25.00 $875.00 Sewer Lateral, 4", 40' long 1 EA $1,335.00 $1,335.00 Masonry wall 320 SF SF $29.65 $9488.00 PAVEMENT A/C Paving @ turtblock edge. 1.5'x59'x4" SF $1.75 $155.00 PCC Paving(drive,patios,walks) 2998 SF SF $5.00 $14,990.00 Paving subgrd prep 2998+88.5 SF $0.50 $1,544.00 Sawcut Existing 59'---- - -,ELF $4.00 $236.00 Contingency 1 .;�:. 10% $6800.00 �Gj ---------------------------------------- a_ No. C 62262 O� Exp:9p_ O 1 TOTAL $72,401.50 1199 Tamarack Av�6UW Califj f•nia 92008 (760) 434 -2617 Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & Inspection April 25, 2011 i NpR Subject: Cost estimate for Grading, Public Improvements, BMP's and site improvements for proposed residence, 1255 San Dieguito Drive, CA 92024 2 6 2p \\ The following is a cost estimate for site improvement to meet city standards for grading plan xxx -G, through completion of building pad and site improvements. Pricing is based on current City of Encinitas unit pricing. ITEM OTY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL GRADING Clear & Grub 8555 SF $00.45 $3,850.00 Excavation & Export 562 CY $27.50 $15,455.00 Excavate & Fill 250 CY $20.00 $5,000.00 Sub - drains (infltrtn) 175 LF $28.00 $4,900.00 BMP'S Grass -swale 500 SF $10.00 $5,000.00 Jute Mate 450 SF $00.40 $180.00 Silt Fence 210 LF $01.60 $336.00 Fiber Rolls 50 LF $02.25 $112.50 Stablized cnstc ent. 100 SF $5.25 $525.00 Concrete Washout 1 EA $500.00 $500.00 MISC. Driveway Apron 160 SF $7.00 $1,120.00 Trench resurfacing 35 LF $25.00 $875.00 Water meter -'/4" 1 EA $2389.00 $2389.00 Sewer Lateral, 4 ", 40' long 1 EA $1,335.00 $1,335.00 Masonry wall 320 SF SF $29.65 $9488.00 PAVEMENT A/C Paving @ turfblock edge. 1.5'x59'x4" SF $1.75 $155.00 PCC Paving(drive,patios,walks) 2998 SF SF $5.00 $14,990.00 Paving subgrd prep 2998+88.5 SF $0.50 $1,544.00 Sawcut Existing 59' LF $4.00 $236.00 Contingency 10% $6800.00 --------------------------------------- y TOTAL $74,790.50 w = I:o. C 8 62 C� ¢J p:qr a �..._ 1199 Tam A �e,risk California 92008 (760) 434 -2617 Recording Requested III): 4387 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE National Commercial Smices WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO AND MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO NAME DAKOTA LAND. LLC �:�p ADDRESS PO BOX 343 CITY ARNOLDS PARK, IA 51331 STATE 6 ZIP GRANT DEED DOG # 2010-0134110 MAR 18, 2010 8:00 AM OFFICIAL RECORD; SAN DIEGO COUNT' RECORDER'S OFFICE DAVID BUTLER COUNTYRECORDER FEES: 2000 OC Oc WAGES: TITLE ORDER NO. "3-gL1 I ESCROW NO. 2277 -MICH D Q APN NO. 268 - 342 -17 L. THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s) An 01 l y U W (kj 4 DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX is $ -0.00 CITY TAX $_0.00 ❑ computed on full value —of property conveyed, or ❑ computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale. ❑ Unincorporated area bd' City of ENCINITAS, and FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, REEDER FAMILY LLC, a NEBRASKA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY hereby GRANT(s) to DAKOTA LAND, LLC, 0.%%Z}X4Sk2 I rt`� IIr�t7 ;l }y CO. yx•1�j the following described real property in the County of SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA: LOT 20 IN BLOCK "G" OF ENCINITAS HIGHLANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 2141, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 4, 1928 EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTH 60 FEET THEREOF REEDER FAMILY LLC, A NEBRASKA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Dated 03.02•ZO/0 ��^ f�" STEVEN REEDER , M AnP%ge r State of California County Of SAN DIEGO iJ1rl %��CCiJI�r✓c%9 /y ff��L On MARCH 2, 2010 before me,. personally appeared STEVEN REEDER, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand `fft�ial seal. 1' D� Signature AAA L� L (Seal) OOCU NT PROVWEO BY STEYMT TIRE OF FORNA IK ;R,,TC_c� -.- BARIARA LYN CIULLO Commission ! 1752267 �. Notary Public - California Son Diego county W Coma. Bprw A117. 2011 First American 4380 La Jolla Village Or Ste 200, San Diego CA 92122 Dickinson 2 oz II�I����I�!�I�!����I� 812012009 Reeder Family LLC PO Box 343 Arnolds Park IA 51331 Enclosed please find 1 attached documents, First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services Transmittal Order No: 398561 Page Count 7 Form No. 1402.06 Policy Page 1 ALTA Owner's Policy (6- 17 -06) Policy Number: 398561 1100302P050600 OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE I4 *Yngk11 -Y1 First American Title Insurance Company Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this policy must be given to the Company at the address shown in Section 18 of the Conditions. COVERED RISKS SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation (the 'Company') Insures, as of Date of Policy and, to the extent stated In Covered Risks 9 and lo, after Date of Policy, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance, sustained or Incurred by the Insured by reason of: 1. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A. 2. Any defect In or lien or encumbrance on the Title. This Covered Risk includes but Is not limited to Insurance against kiss from (a) A defect in the Title caused by (I) forgery, fraud, undue Influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or Impersonation; (II) failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance; (iii) a document affecting Title not property created, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, notarized, or delivered; (tv) failure to perform those acts necessary to create a document by electronic means authorized by law; (v) a document executed under a falsifled, expired, or otherwise Invalid power of attorney; (vi) a document not property flied, recorded, or Indexed in the Public Records Including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law; or (vil) a defective judicial or administrative proceeding. (b) The lien of real estate taxes or assessments Imposed on the Title by a governmental authority due or payable, but unpaid. (c) Any enooachment encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the True that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The term "encroachment' Includes encroachments of existing improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. 3. Unmarketable Title. 4. No right of access to and from the Land. S. The violation or enforcement of any law, ordinance, permit. or governmental regulation (Including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (a) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (b) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (c) the subdivision of land; or (d) environmental protection if a notice, describing any part of the Land, Is recorded in the Public Records setting forth the violation or intention to enforce, but only to the extent of the violation or enforcement referred to In that notice. 6. An enforcement action based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 5 if a notice of the enforcement action, describing any part of the Land, Is recorded In the Public Records, but only to the extent of the enforcement referred to In that notice. 7. The exercise of the rights of eminent domain If a notice of the exercise, describing any part of the Land, is recorded In the Public Records. B. Any taking by a governmental body that has occurred and Is binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 9. Title being vested other than as stated In Schedule A or being defective (a) as a result of the avoidance in whole or in part, a from a court order providing an alternative remedy, of a transfer of all or any part of the title to or any interest in the Land occurring prix to the transaction vesting Title as shown in Schedule A because that prior transfer constituted a fraudulent or preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state Insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws; or (b) because the Instrument of transfer vesting Title as shown In Schedule A constitutes a preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws by reason of the failure of Its recording In the Public Records (i) to be timely, or (II) to impart notice of Its existence to a purchaser for value or to a Judgment a lien creditor. lo. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the True or other matter included In Covered Risks 1 through 9 that has been treated or attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Policy and prior to the recording of the deed or otter Instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown In Schedule A. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in defense of any matter insured against by this 00, but only to the extent provided In the Conditions. First A /mer-icar lir/ /r /nervmrce Company rofm No. 14UL.Ub ALTA Owner's Policy (6- 17 -06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' tees, or expenses that arse by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmentat regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the Character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the Subdivision of land; a (Iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, dens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Pi but Knosvn to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attadung or created Subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 9 and 10); or (e) resilmg in loss or damage that would not have been Sustained if the Insured Claimant had pad value for the Title. 4. Any claim, try reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, Is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Rusk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. CONDITIONS I. DEFINITION OF TERMS The following toms when used in this policy mean: (a) "Amount of Insurance': The amount stated in Schedule A, as may be Increased or decreased by endorsement to this policy, increased try Section 8(b), or decreased by Sections 10 and I1 of these Conchbom. (b) "Date of Policy ": The date designated as 'Date of Polity" in Schedule A. (c) "Entity": A corporation, partnership, tent, limited liability company, or other similar legal entity. (d) 'insured": The Insured named in Schedule A. (i) The term 'Insured' also ncl des (A) successors to the Title of the Insured by operation of law as distinguished from purdwse, including heirs, devisees, Survivors, personal representatives, or next of kin; (B) Successors to an Insured by dissolution, merger, consolidation, distribution, or reorganization; (C) successors to an Insured by its conversion to another kind of Entity; (D) a grantee of an Insured under a deed delivered without Payment of actual valuable consideration conveyng the Title (1) K the stock, shares, memberships, a other equity interests of the grantee are wholty�vned by the named Insured, (2) If the grantee wholly owns the named Insured, (3) if the grantee is wholly -owned by an affiliated Entity of the named Insurer, provided the affiliated Entity and the named Insured ere both wholly-owned by the same person or Entity, a (4) if the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust created by a written instrument established by the Insured named in Schedule A for estate planning purposes. Policy Page 2 Policy Number; 396561 (ii) with regard to (A), (B), (C), and (D) reserving, however, all rights and defenses as to any successor that the Company would have had against any predecessor Insured. (e) "Insured Claim i An Insured claiming loss or damage. (f) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual knowledge, riot constructive knowledge or mote that may be imputed to an Insured by reason of the Public Records or any other records that impart constructive notice of matters affecting the Title. (g) "Land": The land described in Schedule A, and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term 'Land' does not Include any property beyond the Isles of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, Interest estate, or easement In abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify a limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is insured by this policy. (h) "Mortgage ": Mortgage, deed of trust, tint deed, or other security Instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (i) "Pudic Records ": Records established under state stabiles at Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and withoil Knowledge. with respect to Covered Risk 5(d), "Public Records' shall also Include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States District Court for the district where the Land is located. (J) 'Title': The elate a interest described in Sorest A. (k) 'Unmarketable Title": Title affected by an alleged or apparent matter that vvoud permit a prospective purchaser or lessee of the Title or lender on the Title to be released from the obligation to purchase, lease, a lend if them is a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in favor of an Insured, but Only so long as the Insured retains an estate or Interest in the Land, a holds an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given by a purchaser from the insured, or only so long as the Insured shall have liability by reason of warranties in any transfer or conveyance of the Title. This policy shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the Insured of either (1) an estate or interests n the Land, or (ii) an obligation seared by a purchase money Mortgage given to the Insured. 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT The Insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (1) In case of any litigation as set forth in Section 5(a) of these Conditions, (it) in case Knowledge shall come to an Insured hereunder of any claim of title or merest that is adverse to the Title, as Insured, and that might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be Gable by virtue of this policy, or (Ili) If the Title, as insured, is rejected as Unmarketable Title. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured Claimant to provide prompt notice, the Company's liability to the Insured Claimant under the policy shall be reduced to the extent of the Prejudice. 4. PROOF OF LOSS In the event the Company 6 unab;e to determine the amount of kiss or damage, the Company may, at its option, require as a condition of payment that the Insured Claimant furnish a signed proof of loss. The proof of loss must describe the defect, lien, encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this policy that constin,tes the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. S. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS (a) Upon written request by the Insured, and subject to the options contained n Section 7 of these Conditions, the Company, at its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense of an Insured In litigation in which any Mlyd party asserts a claim covered by this policy adverse to the Insured. This obligation is limited to Only those stated causes of action alleging matters insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of Its choice (subject to the right of the Insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Insured as to those stated causes of action. It shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay any fees, costs, or expenses Incurred by the Insured in the defense of those causes of action that allege matters rot insured against by this policy. (b) The Company shall have the right, in addition to the options contained in First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 1402.06 ALTA Omer's Policy (6- 17 -06) Section 7 of these Conditions, at as own cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding a to do any other act that in Its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title, as insured, or to prevent a reduce loss or damage to the Insured The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall be liable to the Insured. The exercise of these rights shall not be an admission of liability or waiver of any provision of this policy. If the Company exertises its rights under this subsection, it must do so diligently. (c) Whenever the Company brings an action or asserts a defense as required or permitted by this policy, the Company may pursue the litigation to a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and It expressly reserves the right, in Its sole discretion, to appeal any adverse Judgment or order. 6. DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE (a) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding and any appeals, the Insured shall secure to the Company the night to so prosecute or provide defense In the action a proceeding, including the right to use at its option, the name of the Insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the Insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (i) In securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or effecting settlement, and (il) in any other lawful act that in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title or any otter matter as insured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Insured under the policy shall termmate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such Cooperation. (b) The Company may reasonably require the Insured Claimant to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and to produce for examination, inspection, and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by the authorized representaUm of the Company, all records, in whatever medium maintained, inducing books, ledgers, checks, memoranda, correspondence, reports, ee- mails, disks, tapes, and videos whether bearing a date before a after Date of Policy, that reasonably pertain to the loss a damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Insured Claimant shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect, and copy all of these records in the custody or control of a third party that reasonably pertain to the less or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Insured Claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, In the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Insured Claimant to submit for examination under oath, produce any reasonably requested Information, or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in this subsection, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. 7. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY In case of a Claim under this poliy, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. To pay or tenter payment of the Amount of Insurance under this policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred try the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment or tender of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all liability and obligations of the Company to the Insured under this policy, tither than to make the payment required in this subsection, shall terminate, including any liabiity or obligation to defend, prosecute. or continue any litigation. (b) To Pay Or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Insured or With the Insured Claimant. (I) To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Insured Claimant any claim insured against under this polity. In addition, the Company will pay any costs, attomeys' fees, and expenses Incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay; or (ii) To pay Or otherwise settle with the Insured Claimant the less or damage provided fa under this policy, together with any costs, Policy Page 3 Policy Number: 398561 attomeys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for in subsections (b)(i) mr (ii), the Company's obligations to the Insured under this policy for the claimed loss or damage, other than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation. S. DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured Claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy. (a) The extent of liability of the Company for loss or damage under this policy shall not exceed the lesser of (i) the Amount of Insurance; or (ii) the difference between the value of the Title as insured and the value of the Tie subject to the risk insured against by this policy. (b) If the Company pursues its rights under Section 5 of these Conditions and is unsuccessful in establishing the Title, as msureo, (i) the Amount of Insurance shall be increased by 10%, and III) the Insured Claimant shall have the right to have the loss or damage determined either as of the date the claim was made by the Insured Claimant or as of the date it is seeded and paid. (c) In addition to the extent of liability under (a) and (b), the Company will also pay those costs, attorneys fees, and expenses Incurred in accordance with Sections 5 and 7 of these Conditions. 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY (a) If the Company establishes the Title, or removes the alleged defect, den, or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the Land, a cures the claim of Unmarketable Title, all as insured, In a reasonatxy, diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall no be liable for any nos or damage caused to the Insured. (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals, adverse to the Title, as insured. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the Insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Insured In settling any claim or suit without the prior wrKten consent of the Company. 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY NI payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, attomeys' fees, and expenses, shall reduce the Amount of Insurance by the amount of the payment. 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE The Amount of Insurance shall be reduced by any amount Use Company pays under any policy insuring a Mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B or to which the Insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which is executed by an Insured after Date of Policy and which is a charge or lien on the Title, and the amount so pad shall be deemed a payment to the Insured under this polo. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS When liability and the extent of loss a damage have been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions, the payment shag be made within 30 days. 13. RIGHTS OF RECOVERY UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT (a) Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, it shall be sutxogated and entitled to the rights of the Insured Claimant in the Title and all other rights and remedies in respect to the claim that the Insured Claimant has against any person or property, to the extent of the amount of any loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses paid by the Company. If requested by the company, the Insured Oaimant shall execute documents to evidence the transfer to the Company of these rights and remedies. The Insured Claimant shall permit the Company to sue, compromise, or settle in the name of the Insured Claimant and to use the name of the Insured Claimant in any transaction or litigation Involving these rights and remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Insured Claimant, the Company stall defer the exercise of its right to recover until after the Insured Claimant shall have recovered its loss. First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 1402.06 ALTA Owner's Policy (6- 17 -06) (b) The Company's right of subrogation includes the rights of the Insured to indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance, or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained in those instruments that address subrogation nghm. 14. ARBITRATION Enter the Company or the Insured may demand that the claim or controversy shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Tale Insurance Arbitraow Rules of the American Land Title Association ('Rules'). Except as provided in the Rules, [here shall be no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other Persons. ArbRable matters may include, but are not limned to, any controversy a claim between the Company and the Insured arising out of a relating to this polo, any service In connection with its issuance or the breach of a poky provision, or to any other controversy or claim arising out of the transaction giving rue to this policy, All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is in excess of 12,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Insured. Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules shall be binding upon the parties. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. IS. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT (a) This policy together with all endorsertents, it any, attaded to it by the Company is the entire policy and contract txtweerh the Insured and the Company. In Interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage that anses out of the status of the Title or by any action asserting such claim shall be restricted to this polity. (c) Any amendment of or endorsement to this policy must be in writing and authenticated try an authorised person, or expressly incorporated by Schedule A of this policy. Policy Page 4 Policy Number: 398561 (d) Each endorsement to this policy issued at any time is made a part of this policy and is subject to all of its terms and Provisions. Except as the endorsement expressly states, R does not (i) modify any of the terms and Provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsement, (iii) extend the Date of Poky, or (Iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. 16. SEVERABILITY In the event any provision of this policy, In whole or in part, K held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy Shall be deemed not to include that provision or such part held to be Invalid, but all other provisions shall remain In full force and effect. 17. CHOICE OF LAW; FORUM (a) Choice of Law: The Insured acknowledges the Company has underwritten the risks covered by this policy and determined the premium charged therefore in reliance upon the law affecting interests in real property and applicable to the interpretation, rights, remedies, or enforcement of policies of title insurance of the jurisdiction where the Land is located. Therefore, the court or an arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Land is located to determine the validity of claims against the Title that are adverse to the Insured and to interpret and enforce the terms of this policy. In neither case shall the court or arbitrator apply its conflicts of law principles m determine the applicable law. (b) Chace of Forum: Any litigation or other proceeding brought by the Insured against the Company must be filed only in a state or federal court within the United States of America or its territories having appropriate jurisdiction. 1A NOTICES, WHERE SENT Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement In writing required to be given to the Company under this policy must be given to the Company at I First American Way, Santa Ana, CA 92707, Attn: Claims Department. POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE S( A M E R Q- � 9 2 First American Tide Insurance Company fW 111 IYV. IYVL. VO ALTA Owner's Policy (6.17 -06) SCHEDULEA First American Title Insurance Company Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: First American Title Insurance Company 4380 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92122 File No.: NCS- 398561 -SD Policy No.: 398561 Address Reference: San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas, CA 92024 Amount of Insurance: $440,000.00 Premium: $1,232.00 Date of Policy: August 10, 2009 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Name of Insured Reeder Family, LLC, a Nebraska Limited Liability Company 2. The estate or interest In the Land that is insured by this policy is Fee Simple 3. Title is vested in: Reeder Family, L-C, a Nebraska Limited Liability Company 4, The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: mucy rage � Poky Number: 398561 Real property in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows: LOT 20 IN BLOCK "G" OF ENCINITAS HIGHLANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 2141, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 4, 1928. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTH 60 FEET THEREOF. APN: 258- 342 -17 -00 First American Title Inwrance Company rorm rvo. iruauo ALTA owner's Policy (6- 17 -06) File No.: NCS- 398561 -SD SCHEDULE B Policy No.: 398561 EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE Poky Page 6 Policy Number: 398561 This Policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: Part One: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. Part Two: 1. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2009 -2010, a lien not yet due or payable. 2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to Chapter 3.5 commencing with Section 75 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. 3. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records. 4. The recital contained in the owner's certificate on the map of said tract, which agrees to allow the cross -arms of poles or other similar structures placed along the right of way or certain highways on said map to overhang the abutting property. First American Title Insurance Company A0 A Owner's—Policy (6- 17 -06) y uyc Policy Number: 398561 Covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements in the document recorded March 12, 1930 in Book 1745, Page 336 of Deeds, which provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any first mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, marital status, ancestry, source of income or disability, to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate Title 42, Section 3604(c), of the United States Codes or Section 12955 of the California Government Code. Lawful restrictions under state and federal law on the age of occupants in senior housing or housing for older persons shall not be construed as restrictions based on familial status. 6. An easement for public utilities, ingress and egress and incidental purposes, recorded February 17, 1931 in Book 1666, Page 147 of Deeds. In Favor of: San Diego Gas & Electric Company Affects: As described therein First American Title Insurance Company IW Technical) ieldfServices, Inc. Civil Do- HYDROLOGY REPORT, PROPOSED REEDER RESIDENCE, 1255 SAN DIEGUITO ROAD, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 PREPARED FOR: Mr. Steven Reeder, Dakota Land, LLC. P.O. Box 313 Cardiff, California 92007 PREPARED BY: Technical Field Services, Inc. 1199 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 April 14, 2011 Project No. 4225 1199 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434- 261,7- PR 2S 2p ( 1 i I ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS Technical Field Services, Inc. gAp Civil Engineering & Insp, April 14, 2011 Project No. 4225 Mr. Steven Reeder Dakota Land, LLC. P.O. Box 313 Cardiff, California 92007 Subject: Hydraulics Study, Proposed Reeder Residence, 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas, California 92024 Dear Mr. Reeder: Transmitted herewith is our Preliminary Hydrology Report for the subject project, dated April 14, 2011. The proposed project will be a two story home constr ucted with basement and detached garage. Lot drainage will be changed from the current pattern to facilitate constriction. This report presents the find- ings of our study, and measures to adequately handle the anticipated condition. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and look forward to continued involvement with your project. Should you have questions, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, Technical Field Services. Inc. Christopher A.`Pirii oZo�'� " (ZIIII'Zi(;`- Principal Enginee No. C s22tS3 0 Exp: cTl3oh' CP /rs Distribution: (2)Addressee 1 199 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434 -2617 Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas April 14, 2011 Project No. 4225 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... ............................... 1 2. SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... ............................... 1 3. FIELD EVALUATION .............................................................................. ............................... 1 4. CALCULATIONS .................................................................................... ............................... 1 5. INFILTRATON BASIN SIZING AND DESIGN ..................................... ............................... 2 6. CONCLUSIOS ......................................................................................... ............................... 4 7. LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................... ..............................4 8. SELECTED REFERENCES .................................................................... ............................... 5 Illustrations Figure 3 -1 — Intensity /Duration Design Chart Figure 2 — Hydrograph data Figure 3— Site map Appendia Appendix —100 Year, 6 hour Rainfall Isopluvial 100 Year, 24 hour Rainfall Isopluvial 85a' Percentile Precipitation Isopluvial J_S� Ka ff "Y&0O Reeder Residence April 14, 2011 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Project No. 4225 1. INTRODUCTION In response to your request and authorization, we have provided Hydrologic evaluation and calcula- tions pertaining to the runoff characteristics for the proposed project, in accordance with the City of Encinitas Engineering Design Manual. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the existing and post - construction storm -water runoff. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located at 1255 San Dieguito Drive, within the City of Encinitas in San Diego County. The site is bound by San Dieguito Drive to the West, residential property to the South, North, and East. The site has no existing strictures. The property is rectangular, and approximately 8,555 s.f. (59 feet wide, and 145 feet deep), with a 10 feet wide right -of -way zone between the edge of pavement and the property line. 3. FIELD EVALUATION Drainage of the site currently allows approximately 72.5% of the lot to flow East, and onto an adjacent residential property. Flow quantities are estimated at 0.421 cfs, and are spread across the East property line boundary of 59 feet. Runoff to San Dieguito Road along the West accounts for the remaining 27.5% of the lot area, and is estimated at 0.160 cfs, concentrated within the pavement edge swale at the Southwest corner of the property. The site does not receive runoff from adjacent properties. There are no existing drainage improvements to the site. The proposed project will consist of a house with detached garage, concrete drive, walkway and patio, which will create a new impervious area of approximately 5988 s.f.. The lot will be graded such that the drainage will continue to flow in the current directions, through landscape infiltration zones along the North and South side yard of the house. Approximately 72.5% of the lot area draining to side yard IMP infiltration basins will flow towards the rear of the lot, where any excess runoff of storm -water would be treated through the basin/bio-filter, stored below grade, and infiltrate into the sub -soil within 72 hours. Approximately 27.5% of the lot will drain towards the front of the lot, where a permanent BMP grass swale zone (9.5'x 59' area) will provide retention, infiltration and sedimentation of storm water before allowing excess runoff from entering the public storm -water drainage system. 4. CALCULATIONS Hydrology calculations herein were performed using the San Diego County Hydrology Design Manual, Rational Method, for a maximum probable storm occurring once in 100 years, for a six hour, and 24hour duration. The peak flow, Q, is calculated using the formula: Q = C'I•A Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Where, C = 0.95( %impervious) + Cp(l %imperviouse) Cp = 0.45, for LDR2.9DU /Acre, soil type B I = 6.59 inches/hour for 5 min. time of concentration A = 8,555 s.f. = 0.196 Ac. April 14, 2011 Project No. 4225 Before development, 72.5% drains East, and 27.5% drains West. 100% of the area is pervious. East runoff: Q = 0.45 * 6.59 * 0.142 ac. = 0.421 cfs West runoff: Q = 0.45 * 6.59 * 0.054 ac. = 0.160 cfs. Total runoff peak is at 240 minutes from storm beginning is 0.531 cfs. After development, 69.93% of the site is impervious, with 1043 sq.ft. of impervious area drain- ing to the west, and 4945 sq.ft. of impervious area draining to the east. The area weighted coefficient of runoff for the front and rear drainage areas are: CWEST = (0.95 *0.024) + (0.45 *0.030)/0.054 = 0.67 CEAST = (0.95 *0.1 l4) + (0.45 *0.029) /0.142 = 0.85 , After development, West runoff. Q = 0.67 * 6.59 * 0.054 ac. = 0.24 cfs, an increase of 0.08 cfs. East runoff: Q = 0.85 *6.59 *0.142 ac. = 0.795 cfs, an increase of 0.375 cfs. 5. INFILTRATION BASIN SISING AND DESIGN Considering flow -based mitigation measures to offset the increase in runoff to the front and rear of the proposed post- development condition, and the geometric constraints of the proposed site layout, it is necessary to analyze sub -areas of the front and rear drainage patterns, and mitigate individual portions to achieve the total required reductions for the East and West flow directions. Due to the overall increase in flow, the minimum total cumulative volume required for the front (West) is: V = 1.5 *2.65 *0.08 *5 *60 = 95.4 cubic feet, and For the rear, V = 1.5 *2.65 *0.375 *5 *60 = 447.5 cubic feet Looking at the West section of the property, we can divide the roof section evenly between the north and south sections, since it falls exactly in the center of the property. The grade high point TKltlkpl M" 9ffVk . 1W_ Reeder Residence April 14, 2011 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Project No. 4225 is located approximately 40 feet from property line at the front, making the portion of the house's roof draining to the North and South, to flow towards the West to be approximately 15 feet. This is an area of 0.00654 ac. flowing off the roof to each area (the North driveway, and the South side -yard). The peak flows from each of those areas are: QfrN = 0.95 *6.59 *0.00654 = 0.041 cfs, and Qfrs = 0.95 *6.59 *0.00654 = 0.041 cfs Combined, they add to 0.082 cfs, larger than the increase due to development of 0.080 cfs. Each of the areas will be drained to infiltration trenches, one on the South side -yard, and one in the center section of the driveway on the North side. The minimum volume for each is: V = 1.5 *2.65 *0.041 *5 *60 = 48.85 cubic feet Multiplying by two gives a total volume available for the front of 97.7 cubic feet, larger than the 95.4 cubic feet required in the front area. Both values check each other For the North front, the infiltration trench is 3 feet wide between the drive strips. The effective depth is 1.5 feet, with a minimum length of 11 feet to meet minimum volume. The infiltration trench at the front south side yard is 4 feet wide, 1.5 feet effective depth, and re- quires a minimum length of 8.2 feet to meet minimum volume required. For the rear (East) area that drains to the North, there is the remainder of the upper roof, and the casita roof, along with %2 of the patio area which will drain to the infiltration trench between the driveway strips, by way of area drains and/or surface flow infiltration. The area is 1412 sq.ft = 0.0324 ac., and the flow from those areas is: Q = 0.95 *6.59 *0.0324 = 0.20 cfs, And the required volume, V = 1.5 *2.65 *0.20 *5 *60 = 238.5 c.f. The minimum infiltration trench size between drive strips is 3 feet wide, 1.5 feet effective depth, and 62 feet long = 279 c.f., larger than the 238.5 c.f. required. The rear portion draining to the south includes 39 feet of the upper roof, %: the patio, and Y: of the garage roof. The areas total 1330 sq.ft. = 0.0306 ac., and the flow from those areas is: Q = 0.95 *6.59 *0.0306 = 0.192 cfs, And the required volume, V = 1.5 *2.65 *0.192 *5 *60 = 229 sq.ft. The minimum size infiltration trench at the south rear side yard is 4 feet wide, 1.5 feet effective depth, and 39 feet in length = 234 cubic feet, larger than the 229 cubic feet required. Combining the rear basin volume available yields 513 cubic feet infiltration storage capacity, lar- ger than the 447.5 cubic feet required. Combining flows mitigated to infiltration equals 0.392 cfs, larger than the increase of 0.375 cfs created by the development. Again, both values check each other. The remaining areas not analyzed drain to landscape areas, and are at or below pre- development conditions, and does not contribute to any additional cross -lot drainage. TechnkW FhM 2 *, Wa. Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas 6. CONCLUSIONS April 14, 2011 Project No. 4225 Based on our observations and the results of our calculations, the change in total runoff after construction is + 0.08 cfs to the West (front) of the lot, and + 0.375 cfs to the East (rear) of the lot.. All runoff will be treated through infiltration and/or bio- filtration devices, and will not flow onto adjacent properties. The peak runoff is calculated to be 0.24 cfs toward the West, and 0.795 cfs towards the East, and occurs at 245 minutes from storm beginning. Runoff flows through landscape areas, an infiltration basin/dry-well and through a 10' wide `Grasspave' infiltration zone and swale allowing maximum infiltration and flow reduction before exiting the property to San Dieguito Road storm drainage swale. 7. LIMITATIONS The Engineering services outlined in this report have been conducted in accordance with current practice and the standard of care exercised by Civil Engineering consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the observations and conclusions expressed in this report. The reported calculated results represent values at the locations studied using current available data. It is important to note that the precision of estimated variables is not exact and variations should be expected. Further accuracy is not implied. Tedw" "M sue, kc. Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas 8. SELECTED REFERENCES County of San Diego, Hydrology Manual, San Diego, dated September, 2003. City of Encinitas, Engineering Design Manual, 2009 City of Encinitas, Encinitas Stormwater Manual, 2011 Plan Submittal for CDP 11 -029, dated 16 March, 2011 April 14, 2011 Project No. 4225 Tedw" RM swvms% Yee. ' ; .. �. ��► �- ���■ Illluu■ uuuumuuuuuununnunnnmu ■■■■Illununnnnnuu • \ �\ �\■ ��iw: �11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ■■ ■ ■11111111111111111111111 ' � • ��\:\ �► ��: is�llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll ■ ■■ ■11111111111111111111111 ;.\ .: • • : ,� :. EOUATION Mall 7.44p6D-0.645 � �lil��. �L! I,; �.! �t,_IIILIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII - 11 111:11��i�19110 l!I1!!l1 4411111111111111! Precipitation Duration �1 �� �� 1 Ij• q 11 `\ 1' 1 SPIN` 1�`li��� l4lw .. . -- -- III. �r`► 1�Ii�IIII��II ...�����1111111���M■ � � - � ' • • � � � ' • - • N�III�IIIi! Ille!! Ilii�!! I�1 'a`,�`"WIWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII■ •ii III !l�•.rl I°�I!�� !�. �1 .:..�. :. ,11:IIIIIil��Illlil!� , ' , . , : Illllli l m�©1-•� :11�1i111!1!1I1I1I1I1II11I1I1I1I1II■ IIIII ..:. ..: . , . Illlllllllliill! ■■......... A■■■■■■■■■ 1111111111 IIIIIIIIIIAI: IIIIIIIiidl! .'1■■�Ill:�lllllllllli� ilill��l �IIIIIIIIiII111111111Yr !!����il������.�I;��;I,���V �gN♦.y.:,.1:!►.�\ ' \�11:.n11l���1 d ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■Illlllllllmlll� Illllllillllin��� ■�'�w'�r`Nli. "Ilhi . : • •� • - • '• ' ■ ���1�11111111111111111111 ■1111111111111111111111111■ ■lii:!IWII��IC�I�i'�11!Ahri�!oi 11111 ►�i�lllli:!Illli�!!!lii�ll91 "'''I��'i���lni�i�lllllli;����� ■ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIllml11111m1 • ■__ 11111I11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�� .�IIIIIII�II!�IIIIIIIIIII • '� — ���--- ......... �----_ —_ rvu o_u 11111111E u.n- uw -nnuou R: 1111111111 uw riiriiiriiuirini--- onuumnum—r--_r__. -_ri °11111 -oo iiiiiiw:wi urrr.u. _ — ��--- �--- r_ r___. u— ouuunn_ uuu•- u•nnunnuuuu---- ____•u....•oriH M� •. ���--- �������-��-. �---r_uouuuouu.m.nnounuu uu• wuuun nunuu uw nnuunnmum nnnuuuuun—r-- m�� �-ou uo uun uun n.•r• un._ .r vnm cc = =mmmmmmm_Ra••. r•.r..rr11..1111811 rrrr. Neill 11111111111�11Malal�aaaa ■.aU.OIOO.'.Oi , � ����������-•uu•uuuuu uunuuuwnmuuuunuuuummmauuaun •.uun u... mmumon■ CC:w ■i ■ii: =0141 °i °IIIICIP ee novel ne s: iailliilllllllllll1111111111iIIIBIIIRIIIIIC uononmm11n Neill liell muuuMINE ■oaa Iloilo unnnuo ... ....... .onammo■■ Maim ale "OO 11011111111111111111 Nigel tools 11111111111111100 malaaealaaral Mollie 11....I ■■ WOMEN MEN NoNONNI 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Ilion amnn 11111111111111 SOMEONE SEMEN NONNI uuunuumnuuonnngnumul ■m Moslem loll nluuwuu ' ■■■■■■■■o■ ■1 milli 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ■.■.Im111111111111111111111 Intensity -0uatton Design Chart - Template 3 -1 RATIONAL METHOD HYDROGRAPH PROGRAM COPYRIGHT 1992.2001 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY RUN DATE 04122/11 HYDROGRAPH FILE NAME Texti TIME OF CONCENTRATION 5 MIN. 6 HOUR RAINFALL 2.5 INCHES BASIN AREA 0.142 ACRES RUNOFF COEFFICIENT 0.85 PEAK DISCHARGE 0.795 CFS TIME (MIN) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 5 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 10 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 15 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 20 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 25 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 30 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 35 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 40 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 45 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 50 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 55 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 60 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 65 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 70 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 75 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 80 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 85 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 90 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 95 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 100 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 105 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 110 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 115 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 120 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 125 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 130 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 135 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 140 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 145 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 150 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 155 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 160 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 165 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 170 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 175 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 180 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 185 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 190 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 195 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.1 TIME (MIN) = 200 DISCHARGE (CFS) - 0.1 TIME (MIN) = 205 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.1 TIME (MIN) = 210 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.1 TIME (MIN) = 215 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.1 TIME (MIN) = 220 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.1 TIME (MIN) = 225 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.1 TIME (MIN) = 230 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.1 TIME (MIN) = 235 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.2 TIME (MIN) = 240 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.2 TIME (MIN) = 245 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.795 TIME (MIN) = 250 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.1 TIME (MIN) = 255 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.1 TIME (MIN) = 260 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.1 TIME (MIN) = 265 DISCHARGE (CFS) - 0.1 TIME (MIN) = 270 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 275 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 280 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 285 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 290 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 295 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 300 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 305 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 310 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 315 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 320 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 325 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 330 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 335 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 340 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 345 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 350 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 355 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 RATIONAL METHOD HYDROGRAPH PROGRAM COPYRIGHT 1992, 2001 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY RUN DATE 04/22!11 HYDROGRAPH FILE NAME Textt TIME OF CONCENTRATION 5 MIN. 6 HOUR RAINFALL 2.5 INCHES BASIN AREA 0.054 ACRES RUNOFF COEFFICIENT 0.67 PEAK DISCHARGE 0.24 CFS TIME (MIN) = 0 TIME (MIN) = 5 TIME (MIN) = 10 TIME (MIN) = 15 TIME (MIN) = 20 TIME (MIN) = 25 TIME (MIN) = 30 TIME (MIN) = 35 TIME (MIN) = 40 TIME (MIN) = 45 TIME (MIN) = 50 TIME (MIN) = 55 TIME (MIN) = 60 TIME (MIN) = 65 TIME (MIN) = 70 TIME (MIN) = 75 TIME (MIN) = 80 TIME (MIN) = 85 TIME (MIN) = 90 TIME (MIN) = 95 TIME (MIN) = 100 TIME (MIN)= 105 TIME (MIN) = 110 TIME (MIN) = 115 TIME (MIN) = 120 TIME (MIN) = 125 TIME (MIN) = 130 TIME (MIN) = 135 TIME (MIN) = 140 TIME (MIN) = 145 TIME (MIN) = 150 TIME (MIN) = 155 TIME (MIN) = 160 TIME (MIN) = 165 TIME (MIN) = 170 TIME (MIN)= 175 TIME (MIN) = 180 TIME (MIN) = 185 TIME (MIN) = 190 TIME (MIN) = 195 TIME (MIN) = 200 TIME (MIN) = 205 TIME (MIN) = 210 TIME (MIN) = 215 TIME (MIN) = 220 TIME (MIN) = 225 TIME (MIN) = 230 TIME (MIN) = 235 TIME (MIN) = 240 TIME (MIN) = 245 TIME (MIN) = 250 TIME (MIN) = 255 TIME (MIN) = 260 TIME (MIN) = 265 TIME (MIN) = 270 TIME (MIN) = 275 TIME (MIN) = 280 TIME (MIN) = 285 TIME (MIN) = 290 TIME (MIN) = 295 TIME (MIN) = 300 TIME (MIN) = 305 TIME (MIN) = 310 TIME (MIN) = 315 TIME (MIN) = 320 TIME (MIN) = 325 TIME (MIN) = 330 TIME (MIN) = 335 TIME (MIN) = 340 TIME (MIN) = 345 TIME (MIN) = 350 TIME (MIN) = 355 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.1 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0.24 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 DISCHARGE (CFS) = 0 ipotj ' pe ✓e %rm� o->7 rl (�l�g�� A-V� e Oran e 33*W _ County • If 33.30' r hS°; Riverside County ' ,' L it t� '•t .. . ..... OCEANIMOE CARLOW ...E t 6 ID .... `• .� . .. t '•`• 33 ' ' . r ". t• 9� Q ENOINR6B, I �lppyr w OD:AIM `Z +84CCAELr: d 1 O !00 d `'t 't - .,`•• `E Cac" {jam INPERUL— J JYi• C1 .�� _ —• j. '� -�- � M e x i c W� 32 °30' 32.30 3 b ra m Oran a Count :., :.,. 33 sa '•� ''°�,` �; :• Riverside County r'.:..•��` ,gym. '• a o::..:: :': • ''°Fig' .' .. " *Q :1 ,., .$a ''t'• '••� ,•y'' 1y ,•� .y1 �.• . •A. ... •,, ..................... ocE sm.,. i •• ,• uRisaAO •.� ` ' ..•, • I;' ( .J •%0" p ,', .... •moo ::: ~`�•= •:- •.:.••••.:a. R ,o w 0 EN NRM , .. ..�' °� r t t gb .. to ggAnr _ ?4 .... 3 Q �0 00) rl 44 hr y.0 t �r ,,,,., 5 .. : d.. { ............ :..95 .. _.... ,• LE a2•4& ppp IMP RU EACH" .•H• 32 °30' - - - N • q - 32 °30' 3 b Technical Field Services, Inc. y PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, REEDER RESIDENCE, 1255 SAN DIEGUITO ROAD, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 PREPARED FOR: Mr. Steven Reeder P.O. Box 313 Cardiff, California 92007 -0313 PREPARED BY: Technical Field Services, Inc. 1 199 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 March 28.2011 Project No. 4225 1199 Tamarack A%enue, ( arlshad. California 92008 (760) 434 -261' n� l L1 APR 2 5 2011 I CITY OF ENCINITAS Technical Field Services, Inc. �.lt March 28, 2011 Project No. 4225 Mr. Steven Reeder P.O. Box 313 Cardiff, California 92007 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation and Recommendations, Reeder Residence, Lot 17 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas, California 92024 Dear Mr. Reeder: Transmitted herewith is our Preliminary Geotechnical Report for the subject project, dated March 28. 2011. The proposed project will be a two story home with a basement, constructed with ICF materials. The soils evaluation services as authorized by you includes: site evaluation of existing soils, laboratory testing for expansive potential, soils classification, moistw"ensity relationship, and recommendations for foundation design and construction. This report presents our field operations, results of our field and laboratory tests and recommendations. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and look forward to continued involvement with your project. Should you have questions, please contact the undersigned. Respectfuliv submitted, Technical Field Services, l Principal Engineer CP /rs Distribution: Na C 62282 ExX 113011, (2)Addressee 1199 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434 -2617 Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas March 28, 2011 Project No. 4225 Illustrations Figure I - Site Location Map Tables Table I - Moisture - Density Test Results Table 2 - Expansion Potential Test Results Appendix Appendix A - Recommended Earthwork Specifications Q21 K"v (i«h TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... ............................... 1 2. SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... ............................... 1 3. SUMMARY OF FIELD EVALUATION 1 .................................................. ............................... 4. FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING ................................................. ............................... 1 5. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ........................................................................... ............................... 1 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................... ............................... 2 7. LI MITATIONS ........................................................................................... ..............................4 8. SELECTED REFERENCES .................................................................... ............................... 5 Illustrations Figure I - Site Location Map Tables Table I - Moisture - Density Test Results Table 2 - Expansion Potential Test Results Appendix Appendix A - Recommended Earthwork Specifications Q21 K"v (i«h Reeder Residence March 28. 2011 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Project No. 4225 1. INTRODUCTION In response to your request and authorization, we have provided geotechnical evaluation and testing services for the proposed project. The purposes of our services were to evaluate existing soils and provide recommendations for construction of a two story home addition of approximately 5100 s.f.. We performed field and laboratory tests of representative material samples to evaluate suitability of the existing underlying soils at the site. Our findings and conclusions are presented herein. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located at 1255 San Dieguito Drive, within the City of Encinitas in San Diego County. The site is bound by San Dieguito Drive to the West, residential property to the South. North, and East. The site is relatively level, and has no existing structures. 3. SUMMARY OF FIELD EVALUATION Our engineers conducted the field investigation on December 28, 2006. Soils encountered con- sisted of fine to medium to brown silty Sand (topsoil) (SM), classified as fill to a depth of 18 inches, below grade. At 18 inches to 8 feet in depth, competent formational soils were encoun- tered consisting of medium cemented light brown Sandstone with fines classified as San Pedro Formation marine terrace deposits. Soil samples were taken for laboratory testing within the pro- posed new construction area Soils were probed and found to be firm and of high density. Soils were visually and texturally classified according to the field identification procedures set forth in the Uniform Soils Classification System. 4. FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on a representative sample of the existing material to evaluate expansion potential, and optimum moisture- density relationship. The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D1557 -01, and the results are presented in Table 1. Expansion potential test was performed in general accor- dance with UBC Standard 18 -2, and the results are presented in Table 2. Groundwater was not encountered during the course of our investigation. Groundwater is antici- pated at a depth greater than 15 feet. We do not anticipate groundwater to affect the proposed development. 5. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS A review of available geologic hazards pertaining to the site indicates the existence of the Elsi- nore fault zone approximately 50 miles to the northeast, the Newport- Coronado fault and the Rose Canyon fault zone approximately 15 miles to the South of the site. These faults, or any other major active faults in the region have the potential to produce moderate to strong ground Tednletl FMW Swvkw, Mr- Reeder Residence March 28. 2011 1255 San Dieguito Drive. Encinitas Project No. 4225 shaking. It is likely that the site will experience the effects of at least one moderate to large mag- nitude earthquake during the life of the proposed structure. We used the computer program Seismic Hazards Curves and Uniform Hazard Response Spectra. provided by the USGS to compute the seismic design criteria in accordance with the 2010 Cali- fornia Building Code (2010 CBC: Based on the 2009 International Building Code [IBC)), Chapter 16 Stuctural Design, Section 1613 Earthquake Loads. Table 3 below summarizes site - specific design criteria obtained from the 2007 California Building Code. The short spectral re- sponse uses a period of 0.2 seconds TABLE 3 SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS Parameter Value IBC-09 Reference Site Class D Table 1613.5.2 S iral Response — Class D (short), Ss 1. 1 20g Figure 1613.5(3) Spectral Response — Class D 1 sec Si 0.38p Figure 1613.5(4) Site Coefficient, Fa 1.05 Table 1613.53(l) Site Coefficient, Fv 1.64 Table 1613.5.3 (2) Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration (short), S, 1.176 Section 1613.5.3 (Eqn 16 -37) Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration 1 sec.), Smt 1.312 Section 1613.5.3 (Eqn 16-38) 5% Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration (short), Sds 0.784 Section 1613.5.4 (Eqn 16-39) 5% Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration 1 See), Sdi 0.875 Section 1613.5.4 (Eqn 16-40) 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our observations and the results of our field and laboratory tests, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for construction of the proposed addition to the residential structure, provided the recommendations included herein are implemented in design and construction. The proposed structure falls under Seismic Use Group 1. The Site Class D is assigned based on the existing soil profile. The Seismic Design Category D analysis procedures as identified in CBC Table 1616.6.3 shall be used in design. A value of 150 psf for lateral bearing capacity may be aced. The equivalent fluid pressure of 55 pcf should be used for retaining wall design, with a friction coefficient of 0.25 against lateral sliding. Based on the consistency of soil deposits, and the absence of shallow groundwater, it is our opin- ion that the potential for liquifaction is very low. Twhrft l FIND 2 e.s, tea Reeder Residence March 28, 2011 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Project No. 4225 Grading And Earthwork The site shall be cleared of all debris and deleterious materials. The surface soils within the ga- rage and casita areas extending to a maximum depth of 36 inches, and a minimum of 5 feet outside of the building footprint, shall be scarified, moisture conditioned to within 2% of opti- mum, and compacted to a minimum of 90% relative density. Considering the basement excavation and exterior wall backtill, the casita portion of the main home footprint should be graded after construction of the basement. Basement excavations may be made with no more than 5 feet vertical cut, with remaining depth requiring 1:1 cut slope above 5 feet. Soils should generally stand without additional shoring. Grading shall be performed in accordance with stan- dard grading procedures outlined in the appendix A, and minimum requirements of the City of Encinitas. Foundation and Slab Continuous footings and/or spread footings are suitable for use for the proposed two story structure, provided they are founded within the following minimums: Basement wall footings should be founded 24" into existing material at limits of excavation. Spread footings and grade beams shall extend a minimum of 24 inches below adjacent grade. Continuous footings for the casita shall be a minimum of 18 inches in depth, and 15 inches in width, and shall he reinforced with a minimum of 2 #4 bars, 3 inches clear from the bottom of footing, and 2 # 4 bars within 3 inches of the top of footings. Garage footings shall be minimum 12" below grade, and founded in compacted fill. It is recommended that concrete be a minimum of 2500 psi for footings and stabs. and 3000 psi for spread footings and grade beams.. Concrete floor slabs shall be a minimum of 4 inches true thickness with reinforcement consist- ing of #3 bars placed at 18 inches on center each way. Slab reinforcement shall be placed within the middle third of the slab by supporting the steel on chairs or "doby" blocks. Slab reinforce- ment should extend a minimum of 6 inches into perimeter footings. Garage slabs may be constructed independent of the garage perimeter footings. The effect of concrete shrinkage will result with cracks developing through the slab. This effect is common to all concrete, and may be reduced by placing the fresh concrete at a maximum slump of 4 inches. The minimum steel rec- ommended is not intended to prevent or reduce shrinkage cracks. Prior to slab placement, the sub -grade should be prepared with 2 inches of clean granular sand, followed by a minimum of l0 -mil thick moisture barrier, and overlain by 2 inches of clean sand. Footings and slab areas to receive concrete should be pre- saturated to optimum moisture 24 hours prior to and wetted just prior to concrete placement. An allowable soils bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot may be used when designing continuous and spread footings founded a minimum of 18 inches into firm natural formation. This value may be increased by 209/6 for each additional foot of depth to a maximum value of 4500 pounds per square foot, as set forth in the 2010 C.B.C. table 1804.2. Tee1W¢tl Fold 8adps, IW_ Reeder Residence March 28, 2011 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Project No. 4225 It is anticipated that over time. the underlying soils have a potential for settlement of no more than 1/8 inch, and potential for differential settlements of as much as 1/8 inch. Drainage Adequate measures shall be implemented to properly finish grade the site after the structure and other improvements are in place, such that the drainage water within the site and adjacent properties is directed away from the foundations, footings floor slabs and the tops of slopes by the use of swales and subsurface drains towards the natural drainage of the lot. Proper surface and subsurface drains shall be used and maintained to minimize the potential of water seeking the level of bearing soils under the foundations. footings and floor slabs. Planting and watering within 18 inches of the structure is not recommended, however may be implemented with proper drainage and limiting water within the 18 inch perimeter zone. 7. LIMITATIONS The geotechnical services outlined in this report have been conducted in accordance with current practice and the standard of care exercised by geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the observations and conclusions expressed in this report. The reported test results represent values at the locations tested. It is important to note that the precision of field and laboratory tests is not exact and variations should be expected. The re- ported locations and elevations of the tests are estimated based on correlations with the site plans. Further accuracy is not implied. Technical FMW $WAcea. one. Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas 8. SELECTED REFERENCES March 28, 2011 Project No. 4225 City of San Diego, 2007, Supplement Amendments to the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, San Diego. Document No. 769818, dated February 2. California Building Code, 2010, Volume 2, Structural Engineering Design Provisions. Technk.l wwm SeMme, kw- Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive. Encinitas Table 1 — Maximum Densitv Test Results March 28, 2011 Project No. 4255 Material Initial Maximum Opre imum Type No. Description Dry Density Moistu Content 1 7.0% (pe0 %) 1 Brown Sand with silts(SM) 127.1 9.0 Table 2 — Expansion Index Test Results Material Type No. Initial Final Expansion Moisture Moisture Index 1 7.0% 12.21/6 0 -20 -very low iZ-" Nish Uch RETENTION AREA SHALL BE LEVEL AND DEPRESSED A MINIMUM OF 8' FROM THE SURROUNDING GRADE TIE 4' PERFORATED PVC PIPE INTO RISER INLET FROM PRE - TREATMENT DEVICE 24' MIN. SEE NOTE BELOW 4' PERFORATED PVC PIPE *PLACE PIPE WITH PERFORATIONS Encinitas Stormwater Manual INFILTRATION BASIN DETAIL FOR IMP DEEP ROOTED, DENSE, DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTING SUITABLE FOR WELL DRAINED SOIL I / APPROVED GRATE INLET r- 2 -3' HARDWOOD MULCH 6 -12' ?VC_ PIPE RISER 'BIORETENTION'ENGINEERED SOIL' LAYER SHALL BE MINIMUM B' DEEP'SANDY LOAM' SOIL MIX WITH NO MORE THAN S% CLAY CONTENT. THE MIX SHALL CONTAIN 5660% SAND, 2630% COMPOST OR HARDWOOD MULCH, AND 2630% TOPSOIL. "314' CRUSHED ROCK LAYER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 24' BUT MAY BE DEEPENED TO INCREASE THE INFILTRATION AND STORAGE ABILITY OF THE BASIN. _ 8 -24' ENGINEERED SOIL 'SEE NOTE BELOW 2.3' OF 318' GRAVEL 2 -3' COVER OVER PIPE 3/4' CRUSHED ROCK TIE 4' PERFORATED PVC PIPE INTO RISER CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: TELEPHONE: (o -Zo -rr /-hvsT vkE72 .50eL5 &Nb- 6-e T?E- o r -7U Fi cL 61+ , cy. FvO7?.v 7D - Svn'F�, Eits�E�cc� L- JA-c.L . EAsrxri �.0ev� &3,la F7 u Gc� ntd 7b �r1 r�fic� �ASrrr�r ..�.vtcts . RJ t rv/- BAspyrt=)k �l z btd) .SFiouc-D B� �T7rGC% f:-9c,gy n;;D O4 Fit "0!4-11 ,e ov—F 104,pL--av- y Pb u-o wa, . 7 -S -ri /Jo Acm,I • - 7 -17--r i eLekueb l•uoRIL TD G+vc \,v►tSN ou7- &ILCA a, H(C" i3E A Z Me Q--DkE L (fKCEb fhMD �S,170 he t-t-KL SFc�2T orb DelLT Gvh /C he e7e2T+ l/E A ' 0.,j ` -�, CHL� R L l , ^!o ll AlaW /,t,o Ce>2 , 7h E)-0 1--l&- C.r v .5;7)- �T . 6 A�, Awv tilruj " Ae"J 6o,-c'. eeJ pE>L SL�n K.rs� l prro C'-rT R&z n 77 c LC Sa t-s /7"r r S QrZErvt -P, OIL -!v 1,-,rk u &r, e)t fo,A,(h 5716N&D oQf- orb k o�T r �d -5- // Sro�M wa >L NSptz77or/, �3x�ESrCO 6,r to a ,�ig 12 197'5�-t 5Tr-/E @ 9 A„q. kl A,5KcA i - c- cc-ucAo USE A ZD /FL. ML-7i/ob o I YgIS W r- 70�OA) gris�NS T H,n, -fa -{ov /L -& 440sry o/v cf Q cl-/,+xroc . AloMc. 77y6- STRt 6oue10 6E m14429 lira IA-15 o 0-C 2- , V °. .s.17jo nco/ Fvctow pcs+i'r (o- /(o -/l ,eE -c.okAJ 9'cxJ,-k� o/l sew . SEE C ANo i+ No �V .4-vo CLc'Kh2itilL ; &I2y0561„ee. mrnog"W oe ✓honN, zv (o -Zo -rr /-hvsT vkE72 .50eL5 &Nb- 6-e T?E- o r -7U Fi cL 61+ , cy. FvO7?.v 7D - Svn'F�, Eits�E�cc� L- JA-c.L . EAsrxri �.0ev� &3,la F7 u Gc� ntd 7b �r1 r�fic� �ASrrr�r ..�.vtcts . RJ t rv/- BAspyrt=)k �l z btd) .SFiouc-D B� �T7rGC% f:-9c,gy n;;D O4 Fit "0!4-11 ,e ov—F 104,pL--av- y Pb u-o wa, . 7 -S -ri /Jo Acm,I • - 7 -17--r i eLekueb l•uoRIL TD G+vc \,v►tSN ou7- &ILCA a, H(C" i3E A Z Me Q--DkE L (fKCEb fhMD �S,170 he t-t-KL SFc�2T orb DelLT Gvh /C he e7e2T+ l/E A ' 0.,j ` -�, CHL� R L l , ^!o ll AlaW /,t,o Ce>2 , 7h E)-0 1--l&- C.r v .5;7)- �T . 6 A�, Awv tilruj " Ae"J 6o,-c'. eeJ pE>L SL�n K.rs� l prro C'-rT R&z n 77 c LC Sa t-s /7"r r S QrZErvt -P, OIL -!v 1,-,rk u &r, e)t fo,A,(h 5716N&D oQf- orb k o�T r �d -5- // Sro�M wa >L NSptz77or/, �3x�ESrCO 6,r to a ,�ig 12 197'5�-t 5Tr-/E @ 9 A„q. kl A,5KcA i - c- cc-ucAo USE A ZD /FL. ML-7i/ob o I YgIS W r- 70�OA) gris�NS T H,n, -fa -{ov /L -& 440sry o/v cf Q cl-/,+xroc . AloMc. 77y6- STRt 6oue10 6E m14429 lira IA-15 o 0-C 2- , V °. .s.17jo nco/ Fvctow pcs+i'r CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: ! �! /L kspEZ.� 66ifOM or-- C>VEG i-wJ.0 /7-/E NE e/V /z Avc -crro Z r o` /N V Ea FL . 6.tsaj ^107m'-Tr -/ Z- 2 7 z 1.4 6Pg,QCb D rA,e-XJsr0N5 6F -5o "TH 5'/,� of u,1-)F XSG'K U" ;Avr V-IE of fz C Z7 /T• rr 5/4' erxK itzto c-rcrL4ATLb e 1pe . 21 9t IZ /A V6mw p&-AA4 n29 A-n!a 3 qo ADc k IAA Eve -54 + sroE cuSa _ m—m 0'r [� 2 ! o r Z 7, SP c -T?W /V cis + 0n1- C,o , my / n4l�2 5 7b 57,0 Sc,Zr ls/64eJAZS q( L--)2- ) !O Swrc� OAJ Alo &-TN 5 r ac 6— fjt (X) . 76n1- nr - 6Aor NCB . 3/2g5//Z, fT 57ZE-Ve - ory S eTE, PC- 1-111�feo OLT 'D CU,tA L.ocf►nonl AbVMCi nc- oav xnf, t , <I- o&aez_-v wig 9,& es- / � o/ep- wr om Y-Uar r rg-:` .4,va 4-7yo rwe-g- jr-r coLO�JCAr(E, !� tL ,aVerhe l- - 5/tcJ(uT Na-iUL t5706E fi4 .,0„ Cu2b Mvo / faeT v �{ n rL tp�l.vtr�ib !� W �N/J O Cc.2B. o /1u,i1 7a C vG' 4 J2 IZ 'o" Cu(16 Aare D w In .G•Ld. pt9ulP zy w r7o Sf -f Scut a S n 'f /llv/f%t A) rlo-r ELn OtJ I i e 4- c prWo vtU &o/r lva-t- or +ks f-f9k liAb= +4.14 dial t,rS �jl, ,titre � O&A > tL- o77c.0 § 916k, S specs a4E7PLACE pg:P. pLA-rJ, w e --snail MMA m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: 'TELEPHONE: l Zo 12 F:u4t.E72 k4LI&16 4ve27 u , ,'y SLvr Q c�fx.A77cruS. oK f� rert ®sP 7!5 srcu „fy �pc�srr 15 /Z QaoJm o - 5w� ins 7-P6 guc lt� a w , 4vE /�i o ace y a vel q27/ f Z 31 8” z" 7 L(c a.+eo A-oAo 30 12- e Cu Q$ Q on ,w rz)gmev . . !T i5 uP nl la 9lacle �r it be�iull� /2 o.w . ANN 2iaeirE- a/ S-1-1L Alol / c.r Lf/►y &ouuv -to 7`D/norfvw . DoT sj� .4i alwn m 0,, -r OG ,e d• H/ 5A0aU,►c.e- and [. rNE Cuao potc goo • G94V EL ora., G a4d' �-r� �IJ.NN t� Lbu,,J� Cu�S W� E F7 a� w1 bl;wwa. , s -rZ «rte s17C 7Z) h..4e... 0se,¢um 0 veff Fitz,)_.q -r _S 1 ,vr �x aG /,rzmL- `/LTLI I�Ier9,rL 7�-1�5 cr,/SSNOi .Sl-&t4jA) ou PC,, J, E CX-7D e4oc6c L7r 129:r, Loth emnAj(� l o SI.uFii� OA l Qr, E -ry 7;L,Is c e-y2 FZvw ,4SM. i ,pE 601UAk77F6 f a Iwo 15 46005, '47 L& D+G �CIc iN o SwrK.E, �hL� /IT,4srLl �yCjS-lhs �1u..6�ok. t�ltl 6cV tV7 -A4u. 73 e ,r /5 ok- s y nfr'ds k7e as- &A r , r7Cc o06ex -4 6/L&74r7aQ -n�ooti, , 04.,JA1a-- S�l� NNnc. As- P crnnl ��a�d .so�or�&,,, rstzcs o%b c�� �h s�rdrd�. !a'2S -IL ALL #TVvN ouC A-S�aDeY�. oL -+� m14429 Technical Field Services, Inc. gAp Civil Engineering & Inspection r �, E n AV9m*31, -M1 I U SEP 7 2011 City of Encinitas I EN'G'YiEER Fngmeering &ervices Permits CiT7OF 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 Re: Engineer's Pad Certification for Project No. 11-029 CDP and Grading Permit Number 10853- GR. Pu sumit to seetiott 23 2433M of the Encinitas 1Vlunicipal Code,-this letter is hereby submitted as Pad Certification Letter for the accessory unit, garage and basement excavation at 1255 San Dieguito Drive Road. As Engineer of Record for the subject project, T hereby state a31 rough grading and exeavatiort- lw "beemcomp"leted ur conformance with the approved guiding plan and requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. 23.24.301 (B). The following list provides the pad elevation as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Fad Rd&AlevatioapeeVIM field measurement Basement 152.00 152.00 Accessory 161.33 F6W-W 161.33 -160:00 23.24.301 (B)1 Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices have beetfielc} verBied and areinsubstarrtia2conformancewitlrdx- st &jeetg plM 23.24.301(B)5 The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field aed�arr itr substantia confornummm with tha subject gadi g pim 23.24.301(B)6 The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. Christopher A. Pii�r v, P. E. (6(v t:a087262 1199 Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434 -2617 Technical Field Services, Inc. gA� Civil Engineering & Inspectkm July 11, 2011 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 LUII D JUL 12 Ui U'.HE ING SERVICES CITY Or ENCINITAS Re: Engineer's Pad Certification for Project No. 11 -029 CDP and Grading Permit Number 10853- GR. Pursuant to section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as an interim Pad Certification Letter for the basement excavation at 1255 San Dieguito Drive Road. As Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading and excavation for the basement has been completed in conformance with the approved grading plan and requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. 23.24.301 (B). The excavated pad elevation for the basement as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan is measured to be 152.0 23.24.301 (B)1 Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.301(B)5 The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.301(B)6 The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. A. t:o. C 62262 Gli P. E. . v �: gAvla �= 1199 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 921108 (760) 434 -2617 Technical Field Services, Inc. i Civil Engineering & Inspection Project Name: Project Address: Contractor • - _ . — plei I N Jobsite Representative: •0 • •' lam� 1 199 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434 -2617 Technical Field Services, Inc. ONil Engineering & luspeclion [41131 AS- GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, DAKOTA LAND, LLC/REEDER RESIDENCE, 1255 SAN DIEGUITO DRIVE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 PREPARED FOR: Mr. Steven Reeder Dakota Land, LLC P.O. Box 313 Cardiff, California 92007 PREPARED BY: Technical Field Services, Inc. 1199 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 September 9, 2011 Project No. 4225 1199 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434 -2617 Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & Inspection September 9, 2011 Project No. 4225 Mr. Steven Reeder P.O. Box 313 Cardiff, California 92007 Subject: As- Graded Geotechnical Report, Reeder Residence/ Dakota Land, LLC 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas, California 92024 Dear Mr. Reeder: Transmitted herewith is our As-Graded Geotechnical Report for the subject project, dated September 9, 2011. The soils evaluation services as authorized by you includes: site observation and testing during grading, excavation and backfill operations. This report presents our field operations and results of our field and laboratory tests. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and look forward to continued involvement with your project. Should you have questions, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, Technical Field Serwic Principal Mrs Distribution: (2) Addressee 1199 Tamarack .Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434 -2617 Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................ 2. SITE DESCRIPTION ............................, 3. SUMMARY OF FIELD EVALUATION 4. LIMITATIONS ......... ............................... 5. SELECTED REFERENCES .................. Tables Table 1 — Field Density Tests for Project No. 4225 Table 2 — Moisture - Density Test Results September 9, 2011 Project No. 4225 Page ................. 1 ................. 1 .................1 ................. 2 ................. 3 Reeder Residence September 9, 2011 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Project No. 4225 1. INTRODUCTION In response to your request and authorization, we have provided geotechnical observation and test- ing services for the proposed project. The purposes of our services were to observe the grading operation and test fill soils for suitable densities and moisture contents. We performed field and laboratory tests of representative material samples to evaluate suitability of compacted soils at the site. Our observations and test results are presented herein. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located at 1255 San Dieguito Drive, within Encinitas, in San Diego County. The site is bound by San Dieguito Drive to the West, and residential property to the North, South and East. 3. SUMMARY OF FIELD EVALUATION Our engineers conducted field observations and tests during grading operations for the subject site, between June 16 and August 31, 2011. The contractor excavated the garage and accessory building pad areas to a depth of three feet below grade, and to five feet outside the building line using a track dozer and excavator. Soils encountered were medium brown to tan silty Sand. Ex- isting soils were generally acceptable for use as fill. Bottom of excavation contained dense formational fine to medium grained silty Sand Terrace Deposit (Qt), and was scarified, moisture conditioned and compacted prior to fill placement. The fill soils were moisture conditioned to within 2% of optimum, placed and compacted in 6 to 8 inch lifts with the dozer. Each lift was also track -rolled under the weight of the dozer. In -situ density tests were performed during the grading operations in general accordance with ASTM D1556. Tests indicate relative compaction of 90 %, or greater. Results of the density tests are presented in Table 1. The approximate loca- tion of the field density test is shown on Figure 1, Test Location Map. Approximately 400 C.Y. of soils from the basement excavations were exported offsite. Basement footings were excavated into competent formational soils. Basement wall backfill was accomplished with native soils and compacted in 6" to 8" lifts using a wacker type compactor. Laboratory tests were performed on representative samples of the mixed material to evaluate op- timum moisture- density relationship. The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D 1557, and the results are presented in Table 2. No further grading or placement of fill has been done. Based on our observations and the results of our field and laboratory tests, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for construction of the proposed residential structure, and will provide bearing capacity required for support of the structure. Tedmimi MW swoces, me. Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas September 9, 2011 Project No. 4225 4. LIMITATIONS The geotechnical services outlined in this report have been conducted in accordance with current practice and the standard of care exercised by geotechnical consultants per forming similar tasks in this area No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the observations and conclusions expressed in this report. The reported test results represent values at the locations tested. It is important to note that the precision of field and laboratory tests is not exact and variations should be expected. The re- ported locations and elevations of the tests are estimated based on correlations with the site plans. Further accuracy is not implied. T.dMldt FbW Seroteas, Inc. Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas September 9, 2011 Project No. 4225 5. SELECTED REFERENCES California Building Code, 2010, Ch's 16, 18, International Building Code, 2009, Ch's 16, 18, Seismic Engineering Design Provisions. Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Technical Field Services, Inc., April 2011 Tedw" FUN SWVMS% Yee. O v n, V � — m z � s � � # C O r o rl xj V L RES DENCE C,)�_ SITE �PLAN ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE = SITE AREA 8,546.25 SF (35 %) = 2,991.2 Reeder Residence 1255 San Dieguito Drive, Encinitas Table 1 — Field Densitv Test Result September 9, 2011 Project No. 4225 Test No. MType Depth Dry De itY % Moisture Rel*tiv oDen- / 1 1 158 115.8 8.5 90.5 2 1 160 117.6 85 91.9 3 1 154 116.1 8.2 90.8 4 1 155 1155 7.8 903 5 1 158 116.4 75 91.0 6 1 160 118.6 8.0 92.7 7 1 159 116.8 7.1 913 8 2 161 115.4 7.6 90.8 Table 2 — Maximum Density Test Results Material Maximum Optimum Type No. Description Dry Density Moisture Content (pct) ( %) 1 Medium brown silty Sand (SM) 127.9 8.5 2 Light tan Saud with silts(SM) 127.1 9.0 %x(33 � � ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT �/ Un/UTAfL Gary of Capital hnprovement Projects ,1 , Encinitas District Support services field operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering / vo LL11n 6a Public Service Counter f�� L AA FROM: Field Operations — /, � 50Lclf —lry )7- Private Contract Inspection / // RE: Grading Permit NO. /0853 CX Y� `t Name Of Project A/` - 9 ESf b eNcr-- Name of Developer DAV-hA LA- (O LLC , S'-f -1!:-qE Q6-7tj Site location f �s5 JAN 11161- rb Dl21UE (address ...number ... street name - . ...suffix) dot) (bldgi The proposed grading of the subject site Will require Construction of retaining walls that are also building walls. The inspection of the site retaining ;walls is to tie done by the Field Operations Division of the .Engineering services Department. However, the inspection of the building retaining walls is to be done by the Building Inspection Division of the Community Development Department. Therefore, issuance of the necessary Building Permit is requested in order to facilitate the completion of rough grading. NO INSPECTIONS BEYOND FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATION ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY BUILDING INSPECTION UNTIL A NOTICE OF ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL, WITHOUT CONDITIONS AND SIGNED BY THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR, IS RECEIVED. FRAMING IS PROHBITED. (S) gnature of Engine ector) (Date) (Signature of Senior Gvll Engineer, only if appropiate) (Date) Reference: Building Permit No. Special Note. Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a full rough grading approval and submit that paperwork when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. JSG1fteld2.d0c1 TF1 760-633-2600 1 FAX 760-633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Fricinim, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760633 -2700 1� recycled paper ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City p Capitol Improvement Projects JJ'' - District Support Services LE12CIi?.1 Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL T0: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. /Db 53 C7 Name of Project 9CED c_ 12e I Name of Developer 0 � Kv } LAnND LLC 1 _ Site Location �ZS� S,Q Af 61.9 6u i.7U . )j9 .. dadoiress,:- ;:..number ... street-name .. +;,-> neu)%iC A- .t"J" %7jgiL . ce Veil a5f ,AV ...suffXl Na'gl ... .. s:.. .. 'J have.-Inspected the 9 raid ing,•at,thesnbject Ste an6have' keglfieldVertiflcatlostsa'fthe pad by the Engineer of work C114A PU✓Abl / dated.,16 31.- I l and certification of soil compaction by the Still Engineer, G"45 P.y lL7W gatetl — 7:am herepy, e eatisfled that the rough •grading has been cornpieted irr:accordance::with the ca pp roved,,ai, • ": ,•:•;::: plans „and -specifications, Chapter .23:24 -of -the Municipal Code ,and::any*other• applicable'- Tcg, .ic <.: engirreerin9 standards and, specific project requirements.­.-;-: •,- :: ;.,; ;, ; n ;•.•;;,. .Based on:my observation and the certifications,_Pke no. exception to the:issuance.of-a �. building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase A / /,q , If any, but only in so far as grading Is concerned. However, this release is not intend d to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, Including .public road, drainage; water, sewer, park, and trail Improvements, and their availability, any other public Improvements, deferred monumentation; or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and Irrigation) has been ccmplet” accordance with the approved plans and specifications. I I DD( (Signature of Senior Ovil Engineer, only if appropiate) (Date) Reference: Building Permh No. Special Note, Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it is both engineering technidans' in- boxes, please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, wbe completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. 7SGlfield3.docl TEL 760. 633 -260D ) FAX 760.633-2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinim. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 - 633 -2700 �*recycled paper Field Clearance to Allow Occupancy TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Building Permit No. -- Li 33 3'1 Name of Project��� I��S f QED Name of DeveloperT)gKoT)0, La-'p , LLC - S IE J I have inspected the site at i LAS &tJ �)'E6 u m J)p-,IU address number street name suffix and have determined that finish (precise) grading (lot no .) fbldg no.) and any other related site improvements are substantially complete and that occupancy is merited. -<.- w-, 5 1'2, Signature of Engineering Inspector Date Signature of Senior Civil Engineer. only if appropriate /` Date Reference: Engineering Permit No. 1Q$53& J, Special Note: Please do not sign the "blue card" that is issued by Building Inspection Division and given to the developer. You are only being asked to verify field conditions. Office staff still has the responsibility to verify that compliance with administrative requirements is achieved, typically payment of impact fees or execution of documents. Return this form, if completed, to counter staff by dropping it in the slot labeled "Final Inspection" . Also, please remember to do final inspections on the related engineering permits and return that paperwork, if completed. Thank you Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & Inspection May 14, 2012 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue xx__ Encinitas, California 92024 i2-55 AA) � f t 607-a LfL Re: Engineer's Final Grading Certification for Project Grading Permit Number 10853- GR. The grading under permit number 10853 GR has been performed in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan or as shown on the attached `As Graded' plan. Final grading inspection has demonstrated that lot drainage conforms to the approved grading plan and that swales drain at a minimum of 1% to the street and/ or an appropriate drainage system. All the Low Impact Development, Source Control and Treatment Control Best Management Practices as shown on the drawing and required by the Best Management Practices Manual II were constructed and are operation R'� F with the required maintenance covenant(s). �OfNF 9i No. C 82282 Engineer of Record 0 Exp: gWf3 Christophe ow, P.E. Dated ✓� �'� �_ � CALL Verification by the Engineering Inspector of this fact is done by the Inspector's signature hereon and will take place only after the above is signed and stamped and will not relieve the Engineer of Record of the ultimate responsibility: Engine Dated 1199 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434 -2617