The URL can be used to link to this page

2009-10323 GLine: 3 "-�) I I 5s r7 I C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S / ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN ENCINITAS, CA 92024 2024 -76o- GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 10323GI PARCEL NO. 254- 362 -7900 PLAN NO.: JOB SITE ADDRESS: 950 SAXONY RD CASE NO.: 09037 / CDP APPLICANT NAME STANLY & MARY GAFNER MAILING ADDRESS: 950 SAXONY RD CITY: ENCINITAS PHONE NO.: 760- 586 -0001 STATE: CA ZIP: 92024 - CONTRACTOR : HHC INC PHONE NO.: 760 -519 -4021 LICENSE NO.: 612611 LICENSE TYPE: B ENGINEER : SAMPO ENGINEERING PHONE NO.: PERMIT ISSUE SAT : 10 PERMIT EXP. ' 4/ PERMIT ISSUED BY: / INSPECTOR BEN OLIVER --------- ---- ------ - - - - -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS ---------------------------- 1. PERMIT FEE .00 2. GIS MAP FEE 3. INSPECTION FEE 3,295.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 5. NPDES INSPT FEE 659.00 6. SECURITY DEPOSIT .00 7. FLOOD CONTROL FE .00 8. TRAFFIC FEE 65,916.00 9. IN-LIEU CH CK FEE .00 10.IN -LIEU IMPROVMT •00 11.PLAN CHECK FEE .00 .00 12.PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 --- ---- ---------- -- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------------------- 'ERMIT TO GUARANTEE BOTH PERFORMANCE AND LABOR /MATERIALS FOR EARTHWORK, DRAINAGE, PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS AND EROSION CONTROL. CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN TRAFFIC CONTROL AT ALL TIMES PER W.A.T.C.H, STANDARDS OR APPROVED PLAN. LETTER DATED DECEMBER 15, 2009 APPLIES. - - -- INSPECTION ---------- - - - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION DATE -- - - - - -- INSPEECTTO%OfR�/'S SIGNATURE - - -- TJ 8 J2 --------------------------------------------- I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. . .GNATURE N1�•�l �� -nl�° PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: . OWNER 2. AGENT 3. OTHER c Bbd Ito DATE SIGNED TELEPHONE NUMBER E.. N David L. Butler °•- COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ASSESSOR /RECORDER /COUNTY CLERK RECORDERICOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260 www.sdarce.com 1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 103 P.O. Box 121750 • San Diego, CA 92112 -1750 San Diego, CA 92101 -2480 Tel. (619) 238 -8158 • Fax (619) 5574155 Tel. (619) 236 -3771 • Fax (619) 5574056 BATCH #: 275126820091208 DOCUMENT #'S RECORDING DATE: SERVICES AVAILABLE AT OFFICE LOCATIONS • Tax Bill Address Changes • Records and Certified Copies: Birth/ Marriage/ Death/ Real Estate • Fictitious Business Names (DBAs) • Marriage Licenses and Ceremonies • Assessor Parcel Maps • Property Ownership • Property Records • Property Values • Document Recordings P01116XII. LI30 DEC 08, 2009 3:59 PM TOTAL DUE: 0.00 SERVICES AVAILABLE ON -LINE AT www.sdarec.com • Forms and Applications • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) • Grantor/ Grantee Index • Fictitious Business Names Index (DBAs) • Property Sales • On -Line Purchases Assessor Parcel Maps Property Characteristics Recorded Documents Recording Requested By: City Engineer pig When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT WAS RECORDED ON DEC 08, 2009 DOCUMENT NUMBER 2009 - 0679898 DAVID L BUTLER, COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIMES 3:59 PM COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR DRAINAGE Assessor's Parcel No. 254- 362 -79 Project No.: 09 -037 CDP /BA Work Order: 10323 -G A. Stanley D Gafner and Mary H Gafner, husband and wife as joint tenants, ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is known as ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: ATTACHMENT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF; and B. In consideration of 09 -037 CDP /BA By the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: SEE ATTACHMENT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of This Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. F. Failure of OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. ACCEPTED AND AGREEC Dated 1l 0 Dated Dated Dated /V (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached) Dated: 1Zhle (Notarization not required) CITY OF ENCINITAS N\ n Peter Cota - Robles Director of Engineering Services J Attachment 'A" Legal Description of Real Property APN 254- 362 -79 All that certain real property situated in the County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows: gStT414 That portion of Saxony Road of Hillside Acres, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1992, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on January 25, 1927, describe as follows: Beginning at the southeast comer of Lot 13 of said map, thence northerly along said easterly lot line North 00 039'45" East 51.24 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing along said lot line North 00 039'45" East 170.77 feet to a point on a non - tangent curve whose radial bearing is North 80 026'26" East; thence leaving said lot line southerly along a curve concave to the east having a radius of 630,00 feet a distance of 82.80 feet through a central angle of 07 031'51" to a point on the centerline of Saxony Road; thence leaving said curve southerly along said centerline South 00 039'45" West 87.06 feet to a point on a non - tangent curve concave to the north having a radius of 1330.00 feet to which a radial line bears North 09 028'42" West; thence westerly 20.29 feet along said curve through a central angle 00 052'27" to the True Point of Beginning. Together with: Z\304111111 That portion of Saxony Road and portion of Lot 1 of Hillside Acres, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1992, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on January 25, 1927, describe as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 13 of said map, thence northerly along said easterly lot line North 00 039'45" East 51.24 feet to the a point on a non- tangent curve concave to the north having a radius of 1330.00 feet to which a radial line bears North 08 036'15" West; thence easterly 20.29 feet along said curve through a central angle 00 052'27" to the True Point of Beginning said point being on the centerline of Saxony Road; thence leaving said curve north along said centerline North 00 039'45" East 87.06 feet to a point on a non - tangent curve concave to the east having a radius of 630.00 feet to which a radial line bears North 72 054'35" East; thence leaving said centerline southerly along said curve 58.06 feet through a central angle of OS 016'50 "; thence tangent South 22 022'14" East 4.21 feet to a tangent curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 20.00 feet; thence southwesterly along said curve 35.81 feet through a central angle of 102 034'54" to a point of compound curve concave northerly having a radius of 1330.00 feet to which a radial line bears North 09 047'20" West; thence westerly 7.21 feet along said curve through a central angle of 00 018'39" to the True Point of Beginning. Together with: PARCEL C: The Southerly 468.50 feet of Lot 13 of Hillside Acres, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1992, filed In the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on January 25, 1927 Except that portion granted to the City of Encinitas, State of California by Deed recorded May 20, 2004, as Instrument No. 2004 - 0464005, of Official Records, describe as follows: That portion of Lot 13 of Hillside Acres, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1992, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, January 25, 1927, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast comer of said lot 13, thence along the southerly line thereof, North 89 014'13" West 180.04 feet to the southwest comer of said lot; thence along the westerly line thereof, North 00 045'47" East 34.00 feet to a point on a non - tangent curve concave to the north having a radius of 1330.00 feet to which a radial line bears South 00 048'37" East; thence leaving said westerly line, easterly 180.92 feet along said curve through a central angle of 07 047'38" to the easterly line of said lot 13; thence along the easterly line thereof, South 00 039'45" West 51.24 feet to the Point of Beginning Said description is made pursuant to that certain Certificate of Compliance recorded May 20, 2004 as Instrument No. 2004 - 0464006, of Official Records Also excepting therefrom that portion described in an Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate Real Property For Public Right of Way recorded May 20, 2004 as Instrument No. 2004 - 0464007 of Official Records. Assessor's Parcel Number: 254- 362 -79 ATTACHMENT B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR DRAINAGE PROJECT NO. 09 -037 CDP /BA OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS 1. For claims that are alleged to have arisen, directly or indirectly, from drainage or runoff associated with the PROPERTY or the plans, design, construction or maintenance of OWNER' s improvements, OWNER unconditionally waives all present and future claims against CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees, and agents. This waiver does not apply to claims that are alleged to have arisen out of the sole, active negligence or deliberate wrongful act of CITY. 2. It is further understood and agreed that all of OWNER'S rights under §1542 of the Civil Code of, the State of California and any similar law of any state or territory of the United States are hereby expressly waived. 9 1542 reads as follows: 1542. Certain claims not affected by general release. A general release does not extend to claims, which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor. 3. OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of OWNER or OWNER's agents, employees, subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives. Upon demand, OWNER shall, at its own expense, defend CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all such liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs. OWNER' s obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the plans, specifications and design of the improvements; but does not extend to liabilities, claims, t demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of a defect in the plans, specifications or design that is a result of a change required by CITY to the OWNER's proposed plans, specifications or design so long as such change is objected to, in writing, by OWNER, and the writing is filed with the City Engineer more than ten days prior to the commencement of work. OWNER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the construction of the improvements; alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the improvements; alleged injury to persons or property; and any alleged inverse condemnation of property as a consequence of the design, construction, or maintenance of the improvements. By approving the improvement plans, specifications and design or by inspecting or approving the improvements, CITY shall not have waived the protections afforded herein to CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents or diminished the obligation of OWNER who shall remain obligated in the same degree to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless as provided above. OWNER's obligation herein does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of the CITY's intentional wrongful acts, CITY's violations of law, or CITY's sole active negligence. 4. OWNER hereby agrees not to develop in any manner the PROPERTY except as authorized by CITY's ordinances and then only in accordance with issued permits. Among other things, but without limitation, this shall prohibit the alteration of landforms, removal of vegetation and the erection of structures of any type, except as permitted or authorization by CITY. 5. This Covenant does not Preclude OWNER taking emergency, protective measures as approved by CITY. State of California County of fives- DOW , On m ter 12 �9 before me, A �� h 1� �1 �/- / /a7QYy �✓6 �I �• 1�4 r r ! Here Insert Rama am Title d tlK personally appeared A. RACHEL AVES TAYLOR Commission • 180Mt MrAM Notary Public - California San Diego County "Iff"My Comm. Expires Jun 25,2012t Place Nolaly Seal Above who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) -Ware subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that t aWmilPotey executed the same in hiyfter/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by NeAterdtheir signatures) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my and a atofficial seal. Signature ignere d Notary Pubic OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signers ❑ Individual ❑ Indivi • Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Cor • Partner —❑ Limited ❑ Generale ❑ rtn ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Other: Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: Ite Officer — Title(s): — ❑ Limited ❑ General f'S Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGHTTHlID9aPRINT GF SIGNER Lin NL'vG -�/ N6'J ' ✓G \' /LAN LAYi iMN 11G \J. N � s-1 ^/4 a'L \-/L�NL��:G'N 'uL�i�NL� 'N "vM,tls 'N e a1 v1 •/ 91 :1 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: Qi r-I 10 yv ET d57 04 FU E?Z oN J 1 Tr C.°' ( � 30PM - T ULZ cX,l ,1 N CH "ZILL45 - Tb C2o.5s of-F Ot�/"ijpg1N(U &T r A- Day vnIL, Ct2QS6 -U bnj 5AxON4 ��. eucglc,�+ri rt I Srn�wR 3� lm PAVE /ZugC -N Sew24rw b&-lksri Q O A- l? k1 r1'J VIA, 5Ib . 13 ( t ,ksL- co,.Ae40 b" 12- cS I 10 - to 1� Rd, sn,r LT- LexAlo%j5. Caew5 'DU6 4 X41 "QLC- o,J &-( C)AS MeL d 'k (1LMC -1D `QLAf -C k- 4 s-�,j - PcA- V +A - I C.4,1 . m14429 A,,(. MLt O RF- P�� , !( I W 30 ,Ax- TRENCH 1 AV p�—(L C�cI►�1 6ArS Tj_,& ! rLf I. A� ST7LL nj& SUE GAS cAenAjS io iico-Kt alt -1N IZ to A�lErtil�� Sr1WCUT /tWN�* �YoN�FkaC 1-n,2 5T- MpRo�'ne*!S rZ �II� Gl1a.r, 11>7K -F4.cc r mo�� <<! � us , ar-r1 vP! "��'f rP mount ren,�xd 4'ryv\ t� �o uf- i0g . �� Films NEr -utn �U P�cK -�,U Tli� TkVNt I-l'� I 7o to Ac F2oM weeIL vocc iG0. D1CLc:- n1spkaT D rf! QR t u AcnvkttA. - C'l - ASE L °N.�C � w'S arnl cuf b$ o-F �IO+I y oCccll ..t5 v btrn uc d r k e- fi, fi -tee . 'Z I23 IJ �IbOt� DRiU� Pevrt� 4re( r Sidew ?�[.. nc>r warcA ! (fcr;>r =. 5 Co .k• .5 TO Ao S lo��vc _ j'j b D¢y oar Z�41, brvLk AAA -(l (LE5� r�tE TOatcRlLbw m14429 r CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: `/ pCG /L r u -Lu /71t M o5 �4 a-CA l r� ��Utl . r 5 r jt� SITE 3 �7%RQs r- at7WOn4 I �7 M Un f ✓ ciL! / /t ! cn /i L/ /1Y� o !` n 7L if a 5wh 60 - * Slp� 0^.;L(4 , Vis 45 17E -11-rCE TUOA-(- jU morvtrvx .Zjls ,c C o u A : k. ,Q, !T /NCO+U / 7f- f o C rOgc�/ � o� Au- .< / nrn co c / c ��n w0/Z wr r [, /�E� Qirvt r /, •uciry a �r� rDl,C CalL rN0 /tx/D CAP ETA OAJ A- r0 0 1 n PCG i-V(vew,q•rl /7do -0' CwZ6 '56me C Ao/lra(S L+jerf /h2d L -tfj t- O Kpr —)v k2e -(�c � r c• i 1 R1 m14429 I r.—_ .c c.q,ocV CE7zT RANCHO COASTAL ENGINEERING Single Source Development Consultant June 29, 2010 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits RE: PAD CERTIFICATION - THE GAFNER RESIDE 950 SAXONY ROAD - DRAWING NO. 10323 -G Pursuant to Section 23.24.310 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for the subject residence. As the Engineer of Record for this project, I hereby state all rough grading for this residence has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. 23.24.310(B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified on June 29, 2010 and shown on the approved grading plan: • MAIN RESIDENCE PER PLAN = 219.3: FIELD SURVEY = 219.3 • GARAGE PLAN PER PLAN = 217.7: FIELD SURVEY = 217.8 23.24.310(B)l. Construction of line and grade for all engineered devices have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.310(B)5. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.310(B)6. The construction of earthen berms and positive buildin�'' pad drainage have been field verified and are in substa)�>ial conformance with the subject grading plan. SincAr)&-ly, TAL /%NGINEERING, INC. ISouglas E. -Logan, R.C.E. 39726 Principal Planning Civil Survey Structural Rancho Coastal Engineering, Inc. 1635 S. Rancho Santa Fe Rd., Ste. 204, San Marcos, CA 92078 Phone (760) 510 -3152, Fax: (760) 510 -3153 www.rcesd.com Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & Inspection AS- GRADED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, GAFNER RESIDENCE, 950 SAXONY ROAD ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 PREPARED FOR: Stanley and Mary Gafner 950 Saxony Road Encinitas, California 92024 PREPARED BY: Technical Field Services, Inc. 1199 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 March 22, 2010 Project No. 4178 1199 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 4342617 Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & Inspection 140) March 22, 2010 Project No. 4178 Mr. & Mrs. Gafner 950 Saxony Road Enciniteas, California 92024 Subject: As- Graded Geotechnical Report, Gafner Residence 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas, California 92024 A.P.N.: 254- 362 -79 Dear Mr. Gafner: Transmitted herewith is our As- Graded Geotechnical Report for the subject project, dated March 22, 2010. The soils evaluation services as authorized by you includes: site observation and testing during grading operations. This report presents our field operations and results of our field and laboratory tests. We appreciate the opportunity to he of service and look forward to continued involvement with your project. Should you have questions, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, Technical Field Servic Principal Engineer CP /rs NO. C U=2 Exp:9lydy Distribution: (2) Addressee 1 199 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434 -2617 Gafner Residence 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........... ............................... 2. SITE DESCRIPTION ...... ............................... 3. SUMMARY OF FIELD EVALUATION ........ 4. LlWrATIONS ................. ............................... 5. SELECTED REFERENCES .......................... Tables Table 1 — Field Density Tests for Project No. 4178 Table 2 — Moisture - Density Test Results March 22, 2010 Project No. 4178 Page 2 3 Gaf tier Residence March 22, 2010 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas Project No. 4178 1. INTRODUCTION In response to your request and authorization, we have provided geotechnical evaluation and testing services for the proposed project. The purposes of our services were to observe the grading opera- tion and test fill soils for suitable densities and moisture contents. We performed field and laboratory tests of representative material samples to evaluate suitability of compacted soils at the site. Our observations and test results are presented herein. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located at 950 Saxony Road, within Encinitas, in San Diego County. The site is bound by Saxony Road to the East, and residential property to the North, South and West. The site is relatively level, and is clean and five of debris from demolition of the previous property improvements. 3. SUMMARY OF FIELD EVALUATION Our engineers conducted field observations and tests during grading operations for the subject site, between February 26 and March 19, 2010. The contractor excavated the garage and building pad areas to a depth of three feet below grade, and to five feet outside the building line using a 922 track dozer and excavator. Soils encountered were medium brown to gray silty clay. Existing soils were generally not acceptable for use as fill. Bottom of excavation contained dense forma- tional fine to medium grained clayey Sand Terrace Deposit (Qt), and was scarified, moisture conditioned and compacted prior to fill placement. Approximately 400 C.Y. of import fill soils from Scripps Encinitas were used to fill the building pad excavations. Import soils consist of me- dium to course silty Sand with a trace of clayey binder. The fill soils were moisture conditioned to within 2% of optimum, placed and compacted in 6 to 8 inch lifts with the dozer. Each lift was also wheel -rolled under the weight of a filled dump truck. In -situ density tests were performed during the grading operations in general accordance with ASTM D1556. Tests indicate relative compaction of 90 %, or greater. Results of the density tests are presented in Table 1. The ap- proximate location of the field density test is shown on Figure 1, Test Location Map. Laboratory tests were performed on representative samples of the mixed material to evaluate op- timum moisture- density relationship. The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D1557, and the results are presented in Table 2. No further grading or placement of fill has been done. Based on our observations and the results of our field and laboratory tests, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for construction of the proposed residential structure, and will provide bearing capacity required for support of the structure. Technical Field Services, One. Gafner Residence 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas 4. LIMITATIONS March 22, 2010 Project No. 4178 The geotechnical services outlined in this report have been conducted in accordance with current practice and the standard of care exercised by geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the observations and conclusions expressed in this report. The reported test results represent values at the locations tested. It is important to note that the precision of field and laboratory tests is not exact and variations should be expected. The re- ported locations and elevations of the tests are estimated based on correlations with the site plans. Further accuracy is not implied. Technical Field SerAces, Inc. Gafner Residence 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas March 22, 2010 Project No. 4178 5. SELECTED REFERENCES California Building Code, 2007, Ch's 16, 18, International Building Code, 2006, Ch's 16, 18, Seismic Engineering Design Provisions. Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Christian Wheeler, Inc., April 2008 Technical Sold SeMe", hie. Gafner Residence 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas Table 1— Field Density Test Result March 22, 2010 Project No. 4178 Test No. Material T e Depth Dry Density c % Moisture Relative en- sity 1 1 217 116.8 8.5 923 2 1 217 119.4 8.0 943 3 1 219 118.6 8.2 93.7 4 1 216 117.8 7.5 93.0 5 1 Surface 124.4 7.8 98.2 Table 2 — Maximum Density Test Results Material Maximum Optimum Type No. Description Dry Density Moisture Content (pcf) ( %) 1 Medium brown silty Sand (SM) 126.6 8.0 C DAnIGNT 11Nf (T)P) Mff + A. Csa�rer R:e�;�de�,ce. 9so Sm)fo^. Rd. 0 - Dev\0 4es +e-5k I MAk:er 1 1� RANCHO COASTAL ENGINEERING Single Source Development Consultant November 15, 2011 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: ENGINEER'S FINAL GRADING CERTIFICATION GAFNER RESIDENCE - DRAWING NO. 10323 -G The grading under permit number 10323 -G has been performed in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan or as shown on the attached "As- Graded" plan. Final grading inspection has demonstrated that lot drainage conforms with the approved grading plan and that swales drain at a minimum of I% to the street and/or an appropriate drainage system. All the Low Impact Development, Management Practices as shown on Practice Manual Part II were const0 maintenance covenant(s). / ENGINEER OF DA > Control and rawing and rt and are over, E. Logan, R.C.E. 39726 -1S -II lent Control Best by the Best Management together with the required C 39728 12-31 -11 Verification by the Engineering Inspector of this fact is done by the Inspector's signature hereon and will take place only after the above is signed and stamped and will not relieve the Engineer of Record of the ultimate responsibility: ENGINEERING INSPECTOR: DATED: IZ 1 28I L Civil Stnictural Rancho Coastal Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 1635 S. Rancho Santa Fe Rd., Ste. 206, San Marcos, CA 92078 Phone (760) 510 -3152, Fax: (760) 510 -3153 i w i CHRISTIAN WHEELER E N G I N E E R I N G i i ' REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION i PROPOSED SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE 950 SAXONY ROAD i ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA is I SUBMITTED TO: MARY GAFNER i' 950 SAXONY ROAD ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 L AUG 2 8 2009. L _ SUBMITTED BY: L CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING 4925 MERCURY STREET L SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 tl a T I 4925 Mercury Street ♦ San Diego, CA 92111 ♦ 858- 496 -9760 f FAX 858- 496 -9758 v ► I CHRISTIAN WHEELER E N G I N E E R I N G April 16, 2008 Mary Gafner 950 Saxony Road Encinitas, California 92024 CWE 2070831.01 SUBJECT: REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 950 SAXONY ROAD, ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA. Dear Nits. Gafnec In accordance with your request and our Proposal dated November 13, 2007, we have completed a geotechnical investigation for the subject residential project. Our findings and recommendations are provided in the attached report. In general, the project area was found to be suitable for the proposed construction provided the recommendations presented herein are followed. The most significant geotechttical conditions to affect the proposed construction are the presence of relatively loose surficial soils (fill/topsoil/subsoil) and the presence of moderately expansive soils. The loose surficial soils will require remedial grading in order to support the proposed structures on conventional shallow foundations with conventional on -grade concrete t floor slabs. In addition, the footings will need to be deepened and the floor slabs will need to be more heavily reinforced due to the expansive soil conditions. The site is located in an area that is relatively free of geologic hazards that will have a significant effect on the proposed construction. The most likely geologic hazard that could affect the site is ground shaking due to seismic activity along one of the regional active faults. However, construction in accordance with the requirements of the most recent edition of the California Building Code and the local governmental agencies should provide a level of life- safety suitable for the type of development proposed. 4925 Mercury Street ♦ San Diego, CA 92111 ♦ 858- 496 -9760 ♦ FAX 858- 496 -9758 L i i t C` T 2070831.01 April 16, 2008 Cover Letter Page No. 2 If you have any questions after reviewing this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, CHRISTGIN WHEELER ENGINEERING Wail Mokhtar, Staff Engineer & ?- Z�-'- Charles H. Christian, RGE # 00215 CHC:CRB:scc:wm cc: (6) Submitted i QPOFESS/p\ �S H. Cy9 ti Q�' mss c . Q No.GE215 y T Exp. 9 -30 -09 Z 07FCHMCP\• P OF At* a urtis2tt, p0\ J No. 1090 F� N 1 CERTIFIED * ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Project ProjectScope ........ _ ...................................... ............................... Findings......................................................... ............................... SiteDescription ................................... ............................... General Geology and Subsurface Conditions ............... Geologic Setting and Sod Description ........................... ArtificialFill ..................................... ............................... PAGE ............... ............................... 2 ................ ..............................3 ............ ............................... 3 ............ ............................... 3 ................ ...... _ .................... 3 - - --- - -- - 1 Subsoil............................ .. ......................................................... _ ......... » ..... _ .......... » ......................................................... 4 TerraceDeposits ...................................................... ............... .......... .................. ............... _. ... .................... _. ............ 4 Groundwater........................................... ................................................ _ ........... _ .................... » ... _ .................................... 4 TectonicSetting ...................................................................................................................................... ..............................5 GeologicHazards ............................................................................................................................ ............................... 5 GroundShaking ............................................... _ .................... ..............................5 Landslide Potential and Slope Stability ......................... .. ..... ................................................ ..... ...................... __ ......... 6 Liquefaction.........................................................................................................................................._. ..............................6 Flooding................................................................................................................................................... ..............................6 Tsunamis.................................................................................................................................................. ..............................6 Seiches...................................................................................................................... ............................... is t_. onuusions ..................................................................................................................................................... .................._...........7 Recommendations.......................................................................................................................................... ..............................7 Gradingand Earthwork ................................................................................................................... ..............................7 Observationof Grading ........................................................................................................................ ..............................8 Clearingand Grubbing ......................................................................................................_....._._....... ......................... »....8 SitePreparation ......................................................................._.................................._.......................... ..............................8 ImportedFill Material ........................................................................................................................... ..............................8 Processing of Fill Areas ...................... Compaction and Method of Filling. Surface Drainage .. ............................... Grading Plan Review .......................... Foundations ............ ............................... General................................................................................................................................._.............._.. ..............................9 ExpansiveCharacteristics .................................................................................................._............._.. ..............................9 Dimensions....................................................................................................................._..................._.. ..............................9 BearingCapacity ................................................................................................................................. ............................... 10 FootingReinforcement....................................................... ................................................ ........ ..................................... 10 LateralLoad Resist ance .................................................................................................................... ............................... 10 SettlementCharacteristics ................................................................................................................. ............................... 10 FoundationPlan Review ......................................................... _ ....................... _ .... » ....... _ ............ .......................... ........ 10 Foundation Excavation Observation ...........................................................»................................ ............................... 10 SolubleSufates ................................................................................................................................. .............................11 SeismicDesign Parameters .......................................................................................................... ............................... l l tOn -Grade Slabs ................................................................................................................................ .............................I1 General................................................................................................................................................. ............................... 11 InteriorFloor Slabs ............................................................................................................................ ............................... I1 EUnder -Slab Vapor Retar ders ............................................................................................................ ............................... 12 CWE 21 )7831.01 Proposed Single- Family Residence 950 Saxonv Road, lincinitas, Califomia Review, Observation and T Uniformity of Conditions... t Change in Scope Time Limitations .................. Professional Standard.......... l Client's Responsibility ......... Field Explorations ..................... Laboratory Testing ........... _....... L i t ATTACHMENTS TABLES t Table I Maximum Ground Accelerations, page 5 Table II Seismic Design Parameters, Page I I r FIGURES Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map, Follows Page I r PLATES Plate 1 Site Plan Plates 2 -7 Trench Logs Plate 8 Laboratory Test Results APPENDICES i Appendix A References Appendix B Recommended Grading Specifications - General Provisions t C W F; 2070831.01 Proposcd Single- Family Residence ')5t1 Saxnm• Road, Fncimtas, California [V 1 LHRISHAN WHEELER F N G I N E E R I N G REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Moi M1 la" NZI raid I law • Plelel!`►lIIMMUS�TIGNI LR1 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION This report presents the results of a preliminary geotechrtical investigation performed for a proposed single - family residence to be constructed at 950 Saxony Road, in the city of Encinitas, California. Figure No. 1, presented on the following page, provides a site vicinity map showing the approximate location of the property. The subject site is an irregular- shaped parcel of land, identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 254- 362 -79. The property currently supports a plant nursery in the approximate southern half and asingle -family residence with a detached garage in the approximate northern half of the property. We understand that it is proposed a to raze the existing residence and detached garage and construct a new, one- and two -story single - family residence with a one -story detached garage /carport, a small two -story detached studio /loft, and a lap swimming pool in the northern portion of the property. The area that supports the existing plant nursery is not part of the proposed construction. The detached garage will be accessed by a covered walkway from the proposed residence. The home, detached garage, and studio /loft will be of masonry block construction with • on -grade concrete floor slabs and are expected to be supported by conventional shallow foundations. Grading is expected to consist of cuts and fills of less than a few feet from existing site grades. a: To aid in the preparation of this report, we were provided with a set of plans for the project prepared by Dinero Arquitectos, dated November 1, 2007. A copy of the site plan was used as a base map for our site plan and geologic mapping, and is included herein as Plate No. 1. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mary Gafner and her design consultants for specific application to the project described herein. Should the project be changed in any way, the modified plans should be submitted to Christian Wheeler Engineering for review to determine their conformance with our recommendations and to determine if any additional subsurface investigation, Laboratory testing and /or recommendations are warranted. Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and CWE 2070831.01 Proposed Single - Family Residence 9511 Saxony Road, lncinitas, California 4925 Mercury Street ; San Die go, CA 92111 ♦ 858 - 496.9760 ♦ FAX 858- 496 -9758 i t SITE VICINITY MAP (Adapted from Thomas Brothers Maps) PROPOSED SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE 950 SAXONY ROAD ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA wsl; ITE a . gllu ❑ , RICH E S LN ST .wry 1ST DR LAO NORMW Jr BRMAW 71— r F `a pB , �iyy i IA BL J ur 4 IL No 02005 Thomas Bros. Maps CWE 2070831 April 2008 Figure 1 our recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, express or implied. PROJECT SCOPE Our preliminary geotechnical investigation consisted of surface reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, obtaining representative sod samples, laboratory testing, analysis of the field and laboratory data and review of relevant geologic literature. Our scope of service did not include assessment of hazardous substance contamination, recommendations to prevent floor slab moisture intrusion or the formation of mold within the structures, or any other services not specifically described in the scope of services presented below. More specifically, the intent of this investigation was to: a) Explore the subsurface conditions of the site to the depths influenced by the proposed construction; b) Evaluate, by laboratory tests and our past experience with similar soil types, the engineering properties of the various strata that may influence the proposed construction, including bearing capacities, expansive characteristics and settlement potential; C) Describe the general geology at the site including possible geologic hazards that could have an effect on the proposed construction, and provide the seismic design parameters as required by the 2007 edition of the California Building Code; d) Address potential construction difficulties that may be encountered due to soil conditions, groundwater or geologic hazards, and provide recommendations concerning these problems; C) Develop soil engineering criteria for site preparation and grading; Recommend an appropriate foundation system for the type of structures anticipated and develop soil engineering design criteria for the recommended foundation design; and ►z g) Present our professional opinions in this report, which includes in addition to our conclusions and recommendations, a plot plan, exploration logs and a summary of the laboratory test results. CWE 2070831 01 Proposed Single -hamdy Residence 950 Saxony Road, Fncinitas, California L, Although a test for the presence of soluble sulfates within the soils that may be in contact with reinforced concrete is performed as part of the scope of our services, it should be understood that Christian Wheeler Engineering does not practice corrosion engineering. If such an analysis is considered necessary, we recommend that the client retain an engineering firm that specializes in this field to consult with them on this matter. The results of this test should only be used as a guideline to detetndne if additional testing and analysis is necessary. FINDINGS SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property is an irregular- shaped parcel of land located at the address of 950 Saxony Road, in the city of Encinitas, California. The site is bounded on the east by Saxony Road, on the south by Leucadia Boulevard, on the west by residential properties and a plant nursery, and on the north by an existing residence. The property currently supports a plant nursery in the approximate southern half and a single - family residence and a detached garage with living space above in the approximate northern half. The project i area addressed by this report is the northern half of the site, which is accessed from Saxony Road via a gravel - covered driveway. Other improvements within the project area include a small covered concrete patio and various concrete walkways. The topography of the project area is relatively level with a difference in elevation of about two to three feet from east to west. Vegetation on -site generally consists of grasses and bushes with l a. some trees. GENERAL GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS GEOLOGIC SETTING AND SOIL DESCRIPTION: The subject site is located in the Coastal Plains . Physiographic Province of San Diego County. Based upon the results of our subsurface explorations and analysis of readily available, pertinent geologic literature, we have found that the project area is underlain by I Quatemary -age terrace deposits that are overlain by residual soil (topsoil /subsoil). We also found that the terrace deposits are capped by a relatively thin layer of fill material in an isolated area within the southern portion of project area. The materials encountered during our subsurface exploration are described below in order of increasing age: ARTIFICIAL FILL (Qaf): A relatively thin layer of fill material was encountered at the surface of our trench T -5, which was excavated in the southern portion of the project area. The encountered fill had a thickness of about two feet and generally consisted of light to medium grayish -brown, silty sand- clayey CWE 2070831.01 Proposed Single - Family Residence 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas, t'alifornia LM sand (SINI -SC) that was moist and loose to medium dense in consistence. The existing till is expected to possess a low expansion index and moderate settlement potential in its present condition, and is considered unsuitable to support new fill and /or settlement- sensitive improvements, but may be used as structural fill. TOPSOIL: A thin layer of topsoil was encountered at the surface of our trenches T -1 through T -1 and T -6. The topsoil within our trenches had a thickness of about six inches to one foot. The encountered topsoil generally consisted of medium to dark brown, silty sand (SNI) that was moist and very loose to medium dense in consistency. The existing topsoil is expected to possess a very low expansion index and moderate to high settlement potential in its present condition, and is considered unsuitable to support fill and /or settlement- sensitive improvements, but may be used as structural fill. } _ SUBSOIL: A relatively thin layer of subsoil was encountered below the topsoil within each of our trenches except trench T -5. The subsoil within our trenches had a thickness of about one and one -half -( feet to two and one -half feet (11/3 ft to T/s ft). The encountered subsoil generally consisted of light to medium brownish -gray and light to medium gray, sandy clay (CL) that was moist and stiff in consistency. Based on our laboratory testing, the subsoil was found to possess a medium expansion index. The i existing subsoil is expected to possess low to moderate settlement potential in its present condition, and is considered unsuitable to support fill and /or settlement- sensitive improvements, but may be t used as structural fill provided it is mixed with other sandy on -site soils. ' TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Quatemary-age terrace deposits were encountered below the fill material and the subsoil within each of our test trenches. The encountered terrace deposits generally f , consisted of fight brownish -gray and light brown, clayey sand (SC), light to medium gray, silty clay (CI I), light to medium brownish - gray, clayey sand -sandy clay (SC -CL) and light to medium reddish- brown and medium brownish -gray, silty sand (Sly. These deposits were damp to moist and dense to very dense in the sandy portions and hard in the clayey portions. The silty sand (SNI) portions are expected to possess a very low expansion index; the clayey sand (SC) and the clayey sand -sandy clay (SC -CL) portions are expected to possess a low to medium expansion index; and the silty clay (CH) portions of the deposits are expected to possess a medium to high expansion index. The existing f: terrace deposits are expected to possess low settlement potential in their present condition and are considered suitable to support fill and /or settlement sensitive improvements. GROUNDWATER: No groundwater was encountered in our subsurface explorations and we do not expect anv groundwater related conditions during or after the proposed construction. I lowever, it should be recognized (:WE 307081191 Proposed Single - Family Residence 9i0 Saxonv Read, liucinitas, California a. that minor groundwater seepage problems might occur after construction and landscaping at a site even where none were present before construction. These are usually minor phenomena and are often the result of an alteration in drainage patterns and /or an increase in irrigation water. Based on the anticipated construction and landscaping, it is our opinion that any seepage problems that may occur will be minor in extent. It is further our opinion that these problems can be most effectively corrected on an individual basis if and when they occur. TECTONIC SETTING: No faults are known to traverse the subject site. However, it should be noted that much of Southern California, including the San Diego County area, is characterized by a series of Quaternary- age fault zones that consist of several individual, en echelon faults that generally strike in a northerly to northwesterly direction. Some of these fault zones (and the individual faults within the zone) are classified as "active" according to the criteria of the California Division of Mines and Geology. Active fault zones are those that have shown conclusive evidence of faulting during the Holocene Epoch (the most recent 11,000 years). The Division of Mines and Geology used the term "potentially active' on Earthquake Fault Zone maps until 1988 to refer to all Quatemary-age (last 1.6 million years) faults for the purpose of evaluation for possible t zonation in accordance with the Mquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act and identified all Quatemary -age faults as "potentially active" except for certain faults that were presumed to be inactive based on direct geologic 1 evidence of inactivity during all of Holocene time or longer. Some faults considered to be "potentially active" would be considered to be "active" but lack specific criteria used by the State Geologist, such as ruffraentfy amts and well- defined Faults older than Quaternary-age are not specifically defined in Special Publication 42, Fault t Rupture Hazard Zones in California, published by the California Division of Mines and Geology. However, it is generally accepted that faults showing no movement during the Quaternary period may be considered to be i"inactive'. - A review of available geologic maps indicates that the active Rose Canyon Fault Zone is located approximately 6 kilometers west of the subject site. Other active fault zones in the region that could possibly affect the site 1, include the Coronado Bank Fault Zone to the southwest, the Newport- Inglewood Fault Zone to the northwest and the Elsinore and Earthquake Valley Fault Zones to the northeast. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS GROUND SHAKING: A likely geologic hazard to affect the site is ground shaking as a result of movement along one of the major active fault zones mentioned above. The maximum ground accelerations that would be attributed to a maximum magnitude earthquake occurring along the nearest fault segments of selected fault zones that could affect the site are summarized in the following Table 1. C \CTE 2070931.01 Proposed Single -Family Residence 910 Saxony Road, Encinitas, California TABLE I: MAXIMUM GROUND ACCELERATIONS Fault Zone Distance Maximum Magnitude Earthquake Maximum Ground Acceleration Rose Canyon 6 km 7.2 Magnitude 0.39 g Newport - Inglewood 17 km 7.1 Nagnitude 0.20 g Coronado Bank 30 km 7.6 L%lagnitude 0.17 g Elsinore Qulian) 43 km 7.1 Nlagtitude 0.10g Earthquake Valley 67 km 6.5 magnitude 0.05 g Probable ground shaking levels at the site could range from slight to moderate, depending on such factors as the magnitude of the seismic event and the distance to the epicenter. It is possible that the site will experience the effects of at least one moderate to large earthquake during the life of the proposed improvements. LANDSLIDE POTENTIAL AND SLOPE STABILITY: As part of this investigation we reviewed the publication, "Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego Metropolitan Area" by Tan, 1995. This reference is a comprehensive study that classifies San Diego County into areas of relative landslide susceptibility. According to this publication, the site is located in Relative Landslide Susceptibility Area 3-1, which is considered to be "generally susceptible" to landsliding and includes gentle to moderate slopes. Based on the gently sloping terrain of the site and the competent nature of the underlying formational materials, it is our professional opinion that the potential for slope failures within the site is low. LIQUEFACTION: The near- surface soils encountered at the site are not considered susceptible to liquefaction due to such factors as soil density, grain -size distribution, plasticity and the absence of shallow groundwater conditions. FLOODING: The site is located outside the boundaries of both the 100 -year and the 500 -year floodplains according to the maps prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. TSUNAMIS: Tsunamis are great sea waves produced by submarine earthquakes or volcanic eruptions. Due to the site's elevation and location, the risk of the site being affected by a tsunami is considered low. SEICHES: Seiches are periodic oscillations it large bodies of water such as lakes, harbors, bays or reservoirs. Due to the site's location, it should not be affected by seiches. CWE 2070831.01 Proposed Single- Family Residence 9511 Saxom Road, Encinitas, Califumia CONCLUSIONS In general, no geotechnical conditions were encountered that would preclude the construction of the proposed single -family residence and the other associated improvements provided the recommendations presented herein are followed. Based on our investigation, we have determined that the project area is underlain by Quatemary-age terrace deposits that are overlain by residual soil (topsoil /subsoil). We also found that the terrace deposits are capped by a relatively thin layer of fill material in an isolated area within the southern portion of project area. The existing fill and residual soil are considered unsuitable in their present condition to support new fill and /or settlement- sensitive improvements and will need to be removed and replaced as structural fill. Provided this is done, the proposed structures can be supported by conventional shallow foundations and have conventional on -grade concrete floor slabs. However, the footings will need to be deepened and the footings and the floor slabs may need to be more heavily reinforced due to expansive soil conditions. In addition, the excavation for the proposed swimming pool bowl may expose the expansive portions of the underlying terrace deposits at the bottom of the pool bowl. As such, consideration should be given in designing the proposed pool bowl for moderately to highly expansive soils. The site is located in an area that is relatively free of geologic hazards that will have a significant effect on the proposed construction. The most likely geologic hazard that could affect the site is ground shaking due to seismic activity along one of the regional active faults. However, construction in accordance with the requirements of the most recent edition of the California Building Code and the local governmental agencies should provide a level of life -safety suitable for the type of development proposed. RECOMMENDATIONS GRADING AND EARTHWORK GENERAL• All grading should conform to the guidelines presented in appendix "J" of the California Building Code, the minimum requirements of the City of Encinitas, and the Recommended Grading Specifications and Special Provisions attached hereto as Appendix B, except where specifically superseded in the text of this report. Prior to grading, a representative of Christian Wheeler Engineering should be present at the preconstntction meeting to provide additional grading guidelines, if necessary, and to review the earthwork schedule. CW'E 2070871.01 Proposed Single- hamil }' Residence Tin Saxony Read, Encinitas, California OBSERVATION OF GRADING: Continuous observation by the Geotechnical Consultant is essential during the grading operation to confirm conditions anticipated by our investigation, to allow adjustments in design criteria to reflect actual field conditions exposed, and to determine that the grading proceeds in general accordance with the recommendations contained herein. CLEARING AND GRUBBING: Site preparation should begin with the removal of the existing improvements that are designated for removal. This removal should include the foundations, slabs, driveway, and underground utilities to be abandoned as well as any vegetation including all significant root material, and other deleterious materials. The resulting materials should be disposed of in an appropriate off -site facility. SITE PREPARATION: Site preparation should consist of removing the existing fill and residual soil (topsoil /subsoil) from areas to support new fill and /or settlement - sensitive improvements and replacing the removed soils as structural fill. The removals should extend to contact with the underlying competent terrace deposits. Based on our subsurface explorations, the fill had a thickness of about two feet and the residual soil had a thickness of about two to three feet, but these unsuitable soils may be thicker in localized areas. Horizontally, the removals should include all areas to receive fill and should extend at least five feet outside areas to support the proposed structures and two feet outside areas to support exterior flatwork or to the property lines, whichever is less. The bottom of all excavations should be approved by our project geologist, engineer, or technician supervisor prior to placing fills or constructing improvements. IMPORTED FILL MATERIAL: Imported fill material may be required during the grading operations for the proposed project. All imported material should be evaluated and approved by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to being imported. At least two working days notice of a potential import source should be given to the 1 Geotechnical Consultant so that appropriate testing can be accomplished. The imported fill material should consist of a granular soil with an expansion index of less than 50. In addition, the imported soil should have less than 25 percent larger than I/4 -inch, no material larger than three inches, and less than 25 percent finer than the standard No. 200 sieve. PROCESSING OF FILL AREAS: Prior to placing any new fill soils or constructing any new improvements in areas that have been cleaned out to receive fill, the exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of 12 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. COMPACTION AND METHOD OF FILLING: All structural fill material placed at the site should be compacted to a relative compaction of at least 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTbI laboratory Test D1557. Fills should be placed at or slightly above optimum moisture content, in lifts six to C\C'F. 2070831.01 Proposed Single- l-arruly Residence 9io Saxony Road, Encinitas, California i. eight inches thick, with each lift compacted by mechanical means. Fills should consist of approved earth material, free of trash or debris, roots, vegetation, or other materials determined to be unsuitable by our soil technicians or project geologist. Fill material should be free of rocks or lumps of sod in excess of twelve inches in maximum dimension. Utility trench backfill within five feet of the proposed structures and beneath the driveway and concrete tlatwork should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its maximum dry density. SURFACE DRAINAGE: The ground around the proposed structures should be graded so that surface water flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. In general we recommend that the ground adjacent to structures slope away at a gradient of at least two percent. Densely vegetated areas where runoff can be impaired should have a minimum gradient of at least five percent within the first three feet from the structure. Gutters and downspouts should discharge into controlled drainage devices. We recommend that if Low Impact Development design incorporating infiltration systems is planned for the project, our firm should be contacted to review the design plans to verify that they are suitable from a geotechnical perspective. GRADING PLAN REVIEW: The final grading plan should be submitted to this office for review in order to ascertain that the recommendations contained in this report have been implemented, and that no additional recommendations are needed due to changes in the anticipated development plans. FOUNDATIONS GENERAL• Based on our findings and engineering judgment, it is our opinion that the proposed structures l may be supported by conventional continuous and isolated spread footings. The following recommendations are considered the minimum based on the anticipated soil conditions and are not intended to be lieu of t structural considerations. All foundations should be designed by a qualified structural engineer. EXPANSIVE CHARACTERISTICS: Based on the results of our laboratory testing and our experience with similar soils, we expect that the foundation soils will have a moderate expansive potential. The recommendations presented in this report reflect this condition. DIMENSIONS: Conventional spread footings supporting the proposed structures should be embedded at least 24 inches below finish pad grade for one- and two-story construction. Continuous footings supporting the proposed structures should have minimum widths of 12 and 15 inches for one- and rwo -story construction, respectively. Isolated footings should have a minimum width of 24 inches. Footings supporting exterior site (AVE 2070931.01 proposed Single -Famil y Residence 9501 Saxons Road, Hncinitas, California walls should be embedded at least 24 inches below the lowest adjacent grade and have a minimum width of U inches. BEARING CAPACITY: Conventional continuous spread footings with a minimum embedment of 24 inches and a minimum width of 12 inches may be designed for an allowable sod bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot. The bearing value may also be increased by one -third for combinations of temporary loads such as those due to wind or seismic loads. FOOTING REINFORCEMENT: The project structural engineer should provide reinforcement requirements for foundations. However, based on soil conditions, we recommend that the minimum reinforcing for continuous footings should consist of at least two No. 5 bars positioned three inches above the bottom of the footing and two No. 5 bars positioned two inches below the top of the footing. LATERAL LOAD RESISTANCE: Lateral loads against foundations may be resisted by friction between the bottom of the footing and the supporting soil, and by the passive pressure against the footing. The coefficient of friction between concrete and soil may be considered to be 0.30. The passive resistance may be considered to be equal to an equivalent fluid weight of 300 pounds per cubic foot. This assumes the footings are poured tight against undisturbed soil. If a combination of the passive pressure and friction is used, the friction value should be reduced by one - third. SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS: The anticipated total and differential foundation settlement is expected to be less than about 1 inch and 1 inch in 40 feet, respectively, provided the recommendations presented in this report are followed. It should be recognized that minor cracks normally occur in concrete slabs and foundations due to shrinkage during curing or redistribution of stresses, therefore some cracks may be anticipated. Such cracks are not necessarily an indication of excessive vertical movements. FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW: The foundation plans should be submitted to this office for review in order to ascertain that the recommendations of this report have been implemented, and that no additional recommendations are needed due to changes in the anticipated constmction FOUNDATION EXCAVATION OBSERVATION: All foundation excavations should be observed by a representative of this office prior to the placement of forms or reinforcement in order to verify that the footings have the proper dimensions and that the soil conditions are as anticipated during the formation of out foundation recommendations. C%%'F. 2070831.01 proposed Single -Family Residence 9511 Saumy Road, lincinitas, California SOLUBLE SUFATES The water soluble sulfate content was determined for a representative soil sample from the site in accordance with California Test Method 417. The results of this test indicate that the representative soil sample had a soluble sulfate content of 0.052 percent. Soils with a soluble sulfate content of less than 0.1 percent are considered to be negligible. Therefore, no special requirements are considered necessary for the concrete mix design. SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS Based on our Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis, the Maximum Ground Acceleration at the site is estimated to be 0.39 g (based upon a Maximum Magnitude Seismic Event of 7.2 Magnitude along the Rose Canyon Fault). In conjunction with the classifications provided in Table 1613.5.2 of the 2007 California Budding Code (CBC), the sods at the subject site can be characterized as having a sod profile type C. We are providing in tabular form below the seismically related design parameters from the California Building Code (CBC), Chapter 16. TABLE IL CBC 2007 EDITION - SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS CBC — Chapter 16 Table Number Seismic Design Parameter Recommended Value 1613.5.2 Soil Profile Type C 1613.5(3) Mapped Spectral Acceleration for Short Periods 0.2 sec S, 1.314 1613.5(4) Mapped Spectral Acceleration for Short Periods 1.0 sec Si 0.493 1613.5.3 (1) Site Coefficient F. 1.000 1613.5.3 (2) Site Coefficient F, 1.307 ON -GRADE SLABS GENERAL.• It is our understanding that the floor systems for the proposed structures will consist of concrete slab -on -grade floors. The following recommendations are considered the minimum slab requirements based on the anticipated soil conditions and are not intended in lieu of structural considerations. INTERIOR FLOOR SLABS: The minimum floor slab thickness should be five inches (actual) and the floor slabs should be reinforced with at least No. 3 reinforcing bars placed at 12 inches on center each way. Slab reinforcement should be supported on chairs such that the reinforcing bars are positioned at mid - height in the 1. floor slab. 'I lie slab reinforcement should extend into the perimeter foundations at least six inches. Ilse garage slab may be constructed independent of the garage perimeter footings, but the slab and foundation should have CWF. 31170931.01 proposed Single -Family Residence 9.50 Saxony Road, Fncinitas, Califi,rnla a felt strip between them. If the garage slabs and footings are constructed monolithically, the slab reinforcement should extend into the perimeter foundations at least six inches. UNDER -SLAB VAPOR RETARDERS: Steps should be taken to minimize the transmission of moisture vapor from the subsoil through the interior slabs where it can potentially damage the interior floor coverings. Local industry standards typically include the placement of a vapor retarder, such as visqueen, between two, 2- inch -thick layers of coarse sand placed directly beneath the concrete slab. This is the most common under - slab vapor retarder system used in San Diego County. The vapor retarder should be at least 15 -mil visqueen with sealed seams and should extend at least 12 inches down the sides of the interior and perimeter footings. The sand should contain less than 10% passing the Number 100 sieve and less than 5% passing the Number 200 sieve. Although the system described above has historically performed adequately, national standards for the installation of vapor retarders below interior slabs are changing as evidenced in currently published standards including ACI 302, "Guide to Concrete Floor and Slab Construction' and ASTb1 E1643, "Standard Practice for Installation of Water Vapor Retarder Used in Contact with Earth or Granular Fill Under Concrete Slabs ". Rather than placing the vapor retarder between the two sand layers, both of these standards recommend placing the sand capillary break layer onto the subgrade with a vapor retarder placed above the sand and the concrete placed directly onto the vapor retarder. There are advantages and disadvantages to each of these installation procedures. An advantage to placing concrete directly onto a vapor retarder is that it eliminates the layer of sand between the slab and vapor retarder. This layer of sand typically contains moisture prior to the placement of concrete and can receive more moisture during the curing and construction processes. This moisture can be retained in the sand layer for an extended period of time until the concrete moisture decreases to the point at which i, the excess sand moisture is absorbed by the concrete and transmitted up through the slab. This process can e- take many months depending upon the environmental conditions. One disadvantage to placing concrete directly onto a vapor retarder is that removing the sand layer from directly beneath the concrete restricts the ability of the concrete to lose moisture on both the top and bottom surfaces during the initial curing period. Variations in the drying rate between the top and bottom surfaces can result in increased concrete cracking, curling, and other finishing issues. The doing rate differences and their potential side effects can be minimized, however, with suitable finishing and curing procedures. CWE 2070931.01 Proposed Single - Family Residence 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas, California Recognizing the stated benefits and limitations of these standard below -slab vapor retarder systems, the owner and designer should select the system that they believe is most suitable for this project considering the construction schedule and planned floor coverings. It should be understood that neither of the described systems provides a "waterproof barrier ". It should also be understood that slab concrete contains free water and should be allowed to reach equilibrium in an environment similar to that anticipated in the completed structure prior to installing floor coverings. We recommend that the flooring installer perform standard moisture vapor emission tests prior to the installation of all moisture - sensitive floor coverings in accordance with ASTM F1869 "Standard Test Method for Measuring Moisture Vapor Emission Rate of Concrete Subffoor Using Anhydrous Calcium Chloride ". LIMITATIONS REVIEW, OBSERVATION AND TESTING The recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon our review of final plans and specifications. Such plans and specifications should be made available to the Geotechnical Engineer and Engineering Geologist so that they may review and verify their compliance with this report and with the California Building Code. It is recommended that Christian Wheeler Engineering be retained to provide continuous soil engineering services during the earthwork operations. This is to verify compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to start of construction. UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS The recommendations and opinions expressed in this report reflect our best estimate of the project a_., requirements based on an evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions encountered at the subsurface exploration locations and on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from those encountered. It should be recognized that the performance of the foundations and /or cut and fill slopes may be influenced by undisclosed or unforeseen variations in the soil conditions that may occur in the intermediate and unexplored areas. Any unusual conditions not covered in this report that may be encountered during site development a. should be brought to the attention of the Geotechnical Engineer so that he may make modifications if necessary. (AVE 3070831.01 Proposed Single - Family Residence 9it1 Saxom Road, 1'ncmitas, (:alifornia CHANGE IN SCOPE "Ms office should be advised of any changes in the project scope or proposed site grading so that we may determine if the recommendations contained herein are appropriate. It should be verified in writing if the recommendations are found to be appropriate for the proposed changes or our recommendations should be modified by a written addendum. TIME LIMITATIONS The findings of this report are valid as of this date. Changes in the condition of a property can, however, occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the work of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in the Standards -of- Practice and /or Government Codes may occur. Due to such changes, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or in part by changes beyond our control. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after a period of two years without a review by us verifying the suitability of the conclusions and recommendations. PROFESSIONAL STANDARD In the performance of our professional services, we comply with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in the same locality. The client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at the locations where our borings, surveys, and explorations are made, and that our data, interpretations, and recommendations are based solely on the information obtained by us. We will be responsible for those data, interpretations, and recommendations, but shall not be responsible for the interpretations by others of the information developed. Our services consist of professional consultation and observation only, and no warranty of any kind whatsoever, express or implied, is made or intended in connection with the work performed or to be performed by us, or by our proposal for consulting or other services, or by our furnishing of oral or written reports or findings. CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITY It is the responsibility of the Client, or her representatives, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the suucntral engineer and architect for the project and incorporated into the project's plans and specifications. It is further their responsibility to take the necessary measures to insure that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out such recommendations during construction. CWE 2070831.01 Proposed Single- Family Residence 950 Saxons Road, Fnciniras, California FIELD EXPLORATIONS Six subsurface explorations were made on March 12, 2008 at the locations indicated on the attached Plate Number 1. These explorations consisted of test trenches excavated using a Case 580L backhoe equipped with an 18 -inch bucket. The fieldwork was conducted under the observation of our engineering geology personnel. The explorations were carefully logged when made. The trench logs are presented on the following Plate Numbers 2 through 7. The sods are described in accordance with the Unified Soils Classification System. In addition, a verbal textural description, the wet color, the apparent moisture and the density or consistency are provided. The density of granular soils is given as very loose, loose, medium dense, dense or very dense. The consistency of silts or clays is given as either very soft, soft, medium stiff, stiff, very stiff, or hard. Disturbed and "relatively undisturbed" samples of typical and representative soils were obtained and returned to the laboratory for testing. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with the generally accepted American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) test methods or suggested procedures. A brief description of the tests performed is presented below: a) CLASSIFICATION: Field classifications were verified in the laboratory by visual examination. The final soil classifications are in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. b) MOISTURE- DENSITY: In -place moisture contents and dry densities were determined for representative soil samples. This information was an aid to classification and permitted recognition of variations in material consistency with depth. The dry unit weight is determined in pounds per cubic foot, and the in -place moisture content is determined as a percentage of the soil's dry weight. The results are summarized in the trench logs. c) MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT TEST: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of two samples of the on -site soil were determined in the laboratory in accordance with ASTM Standard Test D -1557, Method A. The results of these tests are presented on Plate No. 8. CWE 2070831.01 Proposed Single -Family Residence 951) Saxonv Road, Fncimtas, California d) DIRECT SHEAR TEST: A direct shear test was performed to determine the failure envelope of a representative sample of the on -site soil based on yield shear strength. The shear box was designed to accommodate a sample having a diameter of 2.375 inches or 2.50 inches and a height of 1.0 inch. Samples were tested at different vertical loads and a saturated moisture content. The shear stress was applied at a constant rate of strain of approximately 0.05 inch per minute. The results of this test are presented on Plate No. 8. e) EXPANSION INDEX TEST: An expansion index test on a remolded sample was performed on a representative sample of the on -site soil likely to be present near finish grade. The test was performed on the portion of the sample passing the #4 standard sieve. Each sample was brought to optimum moisture content and then dried back to a constant moisture content for 12 hours at 230 ± 9 degrees Fahrenheit. The specimen was then compacted in a 4- inch - diameter mold in two equal layers by means of a tamper, then trimmed to a final height of 1 inch, and brought to a saturation of approximately 50 percent. The specimen was placed in a consohdometer with porous stones at the top and bottom, a total normal load of 12.63 pounds was placed (144.7 pso, and the samples were allowed to consolidate for a period of 10 minutes. The sample was saturated, and the change in vertical movement was recorded until the rate of expansion became nominal. The expansion index is reported on Plate No. 8 as the total vertical displacement times 1000. PLASTIC INDEX TEST: The Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plastic Index were determined for a representative soil sample in order to help classify the sods in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. These tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D4318. The results of this test are presented on Plate No. 8. g) SOLUBLE SULFATES: The soluble sulfate contents were determined for a sample of soil likely to be present at the foundation level. The soluble sulfate content was determined in accordance with California Test Method 417. The results of this test are presented on Plate No. 8. h) GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION: The grain size distribution was determined from a representative soil sample in accordance with ASTIvI D422. The results of this test are presented on Plate No. 8. CWF 2070831.01 proposed Single- Famih; Residence ')it l Saxon% Road, Fncinitas, California 4 a e I 6, a a .. a. 25' -&J- T -2 Qt 1 ■a + T -I I� i > 1 %LipiII d zcl ARTIFICIAL FII.L LNDFRtAIN BY TERRACE' DEPOSITS OTERRACE DEPOSITS H T-6 APRROXIMATF.TFSTTRENCH LOCATION / \p/ GEOLOGIC CONTACT, QUERIED WHERE INI:ERRFD IS' -41• L i Qt T-6 }' I ='-A' _ Q% Qt ESSEE �Iil,lil ff = u T —s T4 QL tivI 55'�• a 1 i 1 s I i -0 Qt 1 *NOTE: RESIDUAL SOIL (TOPSOIL /SUBSOIL) NOT MAPPED SITE PLAN AND GEOTECHNICAL MAP x a Z /—U AWING NAME: SITE PLAN NA f.1CyRY ?GD'1..J..6 +:NLt�w, "D rlX. �N'7M.i�7Y hA�ia/b 0 20' 40, SHFcf rWIMBFR: 17 Yi,UM M�Y•t9 U. /. � �" ,.' / 44it l.Q K'w�J Y iti SCALE: It, = 209 I C.r.wMC1 .'nCA ,r q.I6Y a i U I A1.0 PROPOSED SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE DATE: APRIL -1008 JOB NO.: 2010831.01 I Ili[_ 11 \N BY: (.HC/ IINI /JDB PI - %TE NO: I I\ ,. 1 1. 1 LOG OF TEST TRENCH T -1 5" pk Taye and t_,b„ramty TestI.ernd CA nhdhliLd ( -A ..mu vmpler I ( hunk Sample Sill SOnd*od Tex DR lknnly RmR [)are Excavated: 3/12/08 byuipment 5801. SI',Wb0 �I -ube EoKgcd by: AKN Bucket Size: 18" KID M.i n,m l eri"', DS Drect Shy, S(04 S.dubk Sulfxu, C.m r;..w Alaa.rl Existing Elevation: 100 feet Drive Weight N/A SA Sink .Vnillzu El L.spaesk. Inks IL\ IIyJn.rrcmr R VA Re.urance Vile Prrapused E•-levatiom: Da'pth to Water. Not Fncountemd SE Sind Lqun akin oM �dubk CTkm.ks PI I.. I"J-- Rea I I & Rcu.mt z a w a Z m S, t U SUNMOLRY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Unified Soil Classification System)„ fZ+ (based on (q Q 2 a d m �r88 a 7� 0 100 99M SM IQypib Dark brown, moist, very Incise, SILTY SAND, with abundant organic material. CL Subli light to tedium brownish -gray, moist, +tiff, SANDY (1.\Y, mottles (:K I74 Vial 98 SC Terrace Denosint f0t1: Light brownish -gray, moist, dense, CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium- grained. a 96 CK 12.1 I I a.8 At 4 feet becomes dense to very dense. At 5 feet becomes tedium reddish- bnnvn. CK G94 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — — — — — CH Medium goy, mist, hand, SILTY (1 -:\Y, with waxy white mineral precipitate del". in, and prismatic structure. CK 8 92 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — — — — _ SC Light brown, moat, very dense, CLiYEY SAND, fine to medium- grained. K 90 Tc,;r french terttunated at 10 feet. No water or seepage. 12 88 t� wo Symbol wend � PROPOSED SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE 1 I i mmndu onr I 950 Sallony Road, Encinitas, Cafifamia R 1rrvlRltt Yr•uw (: IRIS IINNVVIIEEl.ER N1': III' ' Nn Sample Rcnn vty I N 1. I N I I R 1 N 1, Nonnpn >'Lnn. Am I1 Cllf: 1pril'_(NIg 11114 \c 1 20'11831 Ill. \ I I \C 1. 2 1 •non ;nick.. presyep LOG OF TEST TRENCH T -2 3 ple TAx aod Labocsgl Tea, I o.nd ( A N1. 0,6„d s.mpk, I K Ch..k SAmple M9 sti,WarJ I'cnctranon lcu UR DL nuty Ring Date I ?xcavatcd: 3/12/08 1?yuipmcnt 5801, 5t Shelby ' tube I ragged by: \KN Bucket Svc: 18" KID ID M..nwtn Dt,."q 0S DlMt+ hear SWfuae G. I..nv,6&.. I'xisfing I1evation: 103 fret Drive Weight N/A SA Sine: \nallsia 01 Ispan.:,o Ind.. I IA I Iyd.0 n: R Val Rcaxtance Value Proposed Iilevatiun: Depth to Water Not Encountered SG. Sand IfywvAnt lhl 9,1ubk CW4 &. PI Igaxtki InJcs R, I I h z O W z z a '- F V SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS z z Z O O (based on Unified Soil CW,ification System) L 1 ❑ > U d =z > oh ❑ tAl 'S� L m i ❑U .7 ❑ .�A F 0 103 $RI Toosoib Medium to dark brown, moist, very loose, SII:IY SAND, with I:K abundant organic material. CL SubqojL light to medium brownish -gray, moist, stiff, SANDY Cl.: \Y, mottled 2 101 SC Terrace Dcpgsdts (Otk Light brownish -gray, moist, dense, CL�A1tiY SAND, fine to medium - grained. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — CK 6.J — — 1I4 5 — — — — CI I I fight to medium gray, moist, hard, SANDY SILLY CLAY, with white mineral precipitate deposits, and prismatic structure. 99 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CK 140 I 1 G n SRI light to medium reddish- brown, moist, very dense, SUAY SAND, fox to medium- grained. CK rest Trench terminated at 5 feet. No water or seepage. G 97 8 95 91 12 91 11 %9 S3mbol PROPOSED SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE 1 mml.v - net 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas, California R \I,pann+erpaR` HRISHAN WHEELER li ) `. III: ' NS:unpk Rccow'n I V . I V I I R I V t, •• Fnva Io, I m. 141•m 11 \ IV: \pnl 4NIM II 11{ \( ) . -111 -0811 I .,1 1111 .nKlt prI w) LOG OF TEST TRENCH T -3 `ampk1weacid Liihi.wzy Test t]I M-h6cJ laid— .. ?Ianpkr r ti I hunL>+mpk SPI'ennd.i J I L� DR Dcnwry tang Date Excavated: 3/12/08 llyuipmcnr 580L >F >hdb. Ibb. I. I,Wd by: AKN Bucket tine: 18" a11) h1..,ont. Ikn,ny DS I &vn Shc.r S(4 tidubk Sulfnn Om r',n„,hd.nm V using Plevarirm: 103 feet Drive Weight N/A S.\ SK.. :\mile. 1.1 I.epon.u,n Indo IL\ Ilydnnmrc. R \'d R,,,,,.< \'.iluc Proposed F.kvalion: lh-pth to Water Not Encountered SE soj Lou' + r:hl �Jubk Ch6, Jk, III 19a. In Jex Ryye+ I I @ RI, pp U OF ,>rain A. .. F O - F SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS T It F F h _ < S (based on Unified Sod Classification System) F., 2, W O iii N gnS, H W a H O F�yl U O { 2 F 0 103 JM �,, \I "jgpo& I\Icdium gray, moist, very loose, SILTY SAND, with abundant oryvmc material. - CL Subsoil light to medium gray, moist, stiff, SANDY CL \Y, mottled, with large tree nxd>. I.K >7n - X95 2 101 SC Terrace Denosiu (Oty: Light brownish -goy, moist, very dense, CLr \YEY SAND, fine to medium - grained, with scattered zones of von stoning. 1 99 CK 7X I'_IL Pest Wrench terminated at d feet. No water ur seepage. 6 97 8 95 93 17 91 1 t j 89 5)mbul Is ,, nd PROPOSED SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE .undwamr 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas, CAlifnnlla yppammS"page W CfIRGTIfIEELER ' Nn Sampk Rvcuvcq' I N r, 1 N I I It I N 1. \nnprcsumr llluu ItS I II Il \ 11- \Pril '1918 +..um nek. pnxnrl pdi \I I. _ +U'OR}I I'I.\II \r� t LOG OF TEST TRENCH T -4 S,urri'le T'p— a l-6m1g,T`"` l,g,M CA xl,.b! J Cvhfi.mn wnrrkr CH I.hunk..,mpl, SVpsl jud Ibu DR Ikn.m RmR Date Excavated: 3/12/08 Fquipmcnr 5801. > sh.lb.'I'A. I. y I d b AKN Bucket Svc: 18" \ID \laaunum lXnuq DS Ibao Shea, S(M S,dubk Sulfaes lira (.m.. Wits. 1:xu'ting l•]evatioee 101 feet Drive Weighr N/A SA S�e.\n.d.a6 Ill Ilxpansvn lnd,a IL\ 11,d ern R VII R. +urmco V.A. Proposed Flevatiou: Depth to VCatee Not EnenunrereJ SE Sand Eym.akm L11 5.lubk l hkmdv VI 1'Issrinn Indca Rc. 11 tk Ronson' Z O rte.., y f" }a' _ HV SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 >W F K z Z H 0 2 ; T y (based on Unified Sod Class cation System) C p., a W G W F y O H P yV fU o °tip 0 101 SM Topsoil: Medium brown, damp, loose to medium dense, SILTY SAND, highly porous. CI. Subso11i Medium grayish- brown, moist, stiff, S-\NDY (:I -\l', murded• with nunur roots. CK U 6 L11 .N 99 ti( - / < -L Temee Dgwsim (Ot1: light brownish -gray, moat, very dense, CL \YIiY SAND /SANDY CL \Y, fine to medium - grained, with white 97 mineral precipitate deposits. CF .'- I1a Ilil Test Trench terminated at 4' /e feet. No water or seepage. G 9S 8 93 91 12 89 I� 4' S)mbol Ugend PROPOSED SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE t rn,unduawr r 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas, CalifOnnia CHRhfIAN \\'lIEE1.ER ' No Sumpk R.cmcn' I h r, I N I I R I N N.ntn pa [mn, 1%.. HY_ I IF D \ I b. \1 +n1 ]11118 o �nua (rock, pit .,u; h IE NO 211'0811 PI \I I W i LOG OF TEST TRENCH T -5 SampleTvoea,d I-bonam" Tesm I,ge,d o a \L "h1s d 1 ohlomia Sampler 1 K r h.4 Sample SPt 9amlard 1'cnmmn,m lbar DR lan•vt IoN Dan, 1fxeavated: 3/12/08 b:yuipmenr. 5801. S1 Shdbt tube la�,gcd by: .\F:.N Bucket Sue: 18" AID Alasnnum DennN IX Dlrrcl Shcu SIM Sdubk>uRana Om r)m.Mlamn I Fisting Elevation: 100 feet Drive Weight N/A S.1 Srac .mall•rs Id hapms.n ln.ka I L\ I lyd,, c,c R ed Ramrmc Viluc Proposed Flcvation: IX-pth to Wat r Not Encountered SK Sid v.yw, i", IN I.luble rhh,ddc. PI 19urxm- Indce Ra I I S Rcsnm,n O UO a 0 ZO {Y Tp v WW `° Z O } 0 O 'O V_ SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS <F it r� 3 Kf. Z Z F S i 55S y (based on Unified Soil Classification System) Q U z z t) y a m 'SJ .7 ail OV O 2 H 0 100 Sp1SC Artificial Fi0 f Oall: I aght to nudium grayish- brown, moist, Itxse to { medium dense, SIL7Y SAND- CL {YEY SAND, with scattered gravels up to 1" in diameter. I 2 98 Sb( Temce Deoosite lOtl: \ledium bmwnuh -goy, damp to moist, dense SIL7Y SAND, , highly porous. K 4b 11166 — SC ------------------------ \Wiutn grayish- brown, mout, very dense, CLIYEY SAND, fie to ------ — medium - grained. 4 96 1 ti Tc r'Preneh terminated at 4 feet. No water or seepage. G 94 8 92 90 12 88 4 86 Symbol I<nend PROPOSED SINGLE- FAMILI" RESIDENCE 1 t %n,undwarer I 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas, Cabfomia R \rraremScep.,jav <TLiN bNIIEFLER oil`. III ' No Sample Rcon'en' I N 1, 1 N I I It I N T. • \innpn -u:vnc ltl,u I1. \I'I \pn171x1% II IH L 1'. um 4,ake po,,,ul LOG OF TEST TRENCH T -6 saml:k_T "e °,I'MriniaT'.. 'K` a f -il AL.bfnd [ ,.hf ann F.onpkr r:K 1'.hunk Sampk �PCSrvWad P.m -rnmm I'.o DR lkn.,p Rmg Date I•Xcavanvd: 3/12/06 1.quipmcnc 5801. >r h4wk Iubc Lugged by: AKN Bucket Sue: 18" NO Nla ,onim Ikn.iry IN Dn," Sheu SOI SAvbks.jf... Ibn fi.nvbdam,n l txisting P.Icvati,m: 100 feet Drive Weight. N/A SA Sixvx ,tid >>n IJ l:.pa ... m Irate. IIA Hldnmcar R.VA lk,,,,v,ce Vilne Proposed Elevation: Depth to Water Not Encountered SE Srnd [ym.akn, 1 M Sd"bk Ch1i,n&, PI Plaancn, In.k. Ra. I1 a: R�,nu... _ U o Z O W r _ G a" a OF '= F U SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 F y Z H t z H (based on Unified Soil Classification System) p,? W aj Q pO O y a m i U {�y' 0 100 Inuill SM Topsoil: Medium brown, damp, I ... sc to medium dense, >II:IY S:\ND. (.1, Subsoih \tedium grayish- brown, moist, stiff, 5: \NDY (L \Y, motded. NID, DS, A I6.9 W6.8 El, Expansion Index = 81 (medium). P1, 96 SA SC Terrace De eiu f00: Light to medium brownish -gray, moist, very dense /hand, CL\\'ISY SAND /SANDY CL \Y, fine to medium - grained, J 96 with white mineral precipitate deprrits, and prismatic structure. ''K 12.4 I I L7 Test Trench terminated at 4 feet. No water or seepage. 6 94 8 92 90 12 88 1J 86 Symbol I<ecnd PROPOSED SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE 1 ..,,,mdu:uer / 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas, California �( \pp.trent "Plki CIIRI ?il\NWHEELER • Nn Sample Rceo,.,)' I N r, 1 N I I It I N r; " N.ouvprc.tuo' M".' Nl IIP I) \I1' \pnl]oo8 .um1 :ranks pn •, m1 It tµ \t .. `x'11851 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDFNCF 950 SAXONY ROAD ENCINITAS CALTFORNIA i MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D1557) Sample Location Test Trench T-6 @ 0.5' -3' i Sample Description Grayish -brown, CL Maximum Density 126.0 pcf Optimum loisture 10.8 DIRECT SHEAR (ASTM D3080) Sample Location Test Trench T-6 @ 0.Y -3' Sample Type Remolded to 90 Friction Angle 160 Cohesion 750 psf EXPANSION INDEX (ASTM D4829) Sample Location: Test Trench T-6 @ 0.5' -3' Initial Doisture: 10.1 Initial Dry Density: 102.8 pcf Final Moisture: 26.7 Expansion Index: 80 (medium) GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION (ASTM D422) Sample Location Test Trench T-6 @ 0.5' -3' Sires Sit, Pmzn! Pauing �- #4 100 #8 99 #16 96 #30 90 #50 78 #100 65 #200 55 L 0.05 mm 49 0.005 mm 34 0.001 mm 30 1. LIQUID LIMIT, PLASTIC LIMIT, AND PLASTICITY INDEX (ASTM D4318) Sample Location Test Trench T-6 @ 0.5'-3' Liquid Limit 43 plastic Limit 20 Plasticity Index 23 Classification CL l: SOLUBLE SULFATES (CALIFORNIA TEST 417) Sample Location Test Trench T -6 @ 0.5' -3' 1. Soluble Sulfate 0!(52'x. (SO;) t- (AX F ]1)'1181101 \pnl _'flag I'Lrrr \n. ri IL CWE 2070831.01 April 16, 2008 Appendix A REFERENCES Anderson, J.G.; Rockwell, R.K. and Agnew, D.C., 1989, Past and Possible Future Earthquakes of Significance to the San Diego Region, Earthquake Spectra, Volume 5, No. 2, 1989. Blake, T.F., 2000, EQFAULT, A Computer Program for the Estimation of Peak Horizontal Acceleration from 3 -D Fault Sources, Version 3.0, Thomas F. Blake Computer Services and Software, Thousand Oaks, California. Booze, David M., Joyner, William B., and Fumal, Thomas E., 1997, "Empirical Near- Source Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Pseudo - Absolute Acceleration Response Spectra ", in Seismological Research Letters, Volume 68, Number 1, January/ February 1997. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1997, "Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in i California ", CDMG Special Publication 117. ! Countywide Flood Insurance Rate Map, Map No. 06073C1033 F (panel 1033F of 2375), prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date June 19, 1997. F Kennedy, M.P., 1975, Geology of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, California; California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 200. i Kem, P., 1989, Earthquakes and Faults in San Diego County, Pickle Press, 73 pp. . Tan, S.S., 1995, Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego Metropolitan area, San l Diego County, California, California Division of Mines and Geology Open -File Report 95 -03. I Wesnousky, S.G., 1986, "Earthquakes, Quaternary Faults, and Seismic Hazards in California ", in Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 91, No. BL, pp 12,587 to 12,631, November 1986. f Hart, E.W., 1994, Fault- Rupture Hazard Zones in California, California Division of Mines and Geology Special 1. Publication 42. i i CWE 2070831.01 Apnl 16, 21X18 Appendix B - l RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS - GENERAL PROVISIONS PROPOSED SINGLE -F INIILY RESIDENCE 950 SAXONY ROAD Memo I MEMO 4 FEW= GENERAL INTENT The intent of these specifications is to establish procedures for clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to be filled, and placing and compacting fill soils to the lines and grades shown on the accepted plans. The recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report and /or the attached Special Provisions are a part of the Recommended Grading Specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. These specifications shall only be used in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which they are a part. No deviation from these specifications will be allowed, except where specified in the geotechnical report or in other written communication signed by the Geotechnical Engineer. OBSERVATION AND TESTING Christian Wheeler Engineering shall be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer to observe and test the earthwork in accordance with these specifications. It will be necessary that the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative provide adequate observation so that he may provide his opinion as to whether or not the t work was accomplished as specified. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the Geotechnical Engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes and new information and data so that he may provide these opinions. In the event that any unusual conditions not covered by the special provisions or preliminary geotechnical report are encountered during the grading operations, the Geotechnical Engineer i. shall be contacted for further recommendations. k If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Engineer, substandard conditions are encountered, such as questionable or unsuitable soil, unacceptable moisture content, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc., 61 construction should be stopped until the conditions are remedied or corrected or he shall recommend rejection of this work. Tests used to determine the degree of compaction should be performed in accordance with the following American Society for Testing and Nlaterials test methods: W. CWE 2070831.01 April 16, 2008 appendix B - 2 Maximum Density & Optimum Moisture Content - ASTM D- 1557 -91 Density of Soil In -Place - ASTN[ D- 1556 -90 or ASTNI D -2922 All densities shall be expressed in terms of Relative Compaction as determined by the foregoing ASThI testing procedures. PREPARATION OF AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL All vegetation, brush and debris derived from clearing operations shall be removed, and legally disposed of. All areas disturbed by site grading should be left in a neat and finished appearance, free from unsightly debris. After clearing or benching the natural ground, the areas to be filled shall be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, brought to the proper moisture content, compacted and tested for the specified minimum degree of compaction. All loose soils in excess of 6 inches thick should be removed to firm natural ground which is defined as natural soil which possesses an in -situ density of at least 90 percent of its maximum dry density. When the slope of the natural ground receiving fill exceeds 20 percent (5 horizontal units to 1 vertical unit), the original ground shall be stepped or benched. Benches shall be cut to a firm competent formational soil. The lower bench shall be at least 10 feet wide or 1 -1 /2 times the equipment width, whichever is greater, and shall be sloped back into the hillside at a gradient of not less than two (2) percent. All other benches should be at least 6 feet wide. The horizontal portion of each bench shall be compacted prior to receiving fill as specified herein for compacted natural ground. Ground slopes flatter than 20 percent shall be benched when considered necessary by the Geotechnical Engineer. Any abandoned buried structures encountered during grading operations must be totally removed. All underground utilities to be abandoned beneath any proposed structure should be removed from within 10 feet of the structure and properly capped off. The resulting depressions from the above described procedure should be backfilled with acceptable soil that is compacted to the requirements of the Geotechnical Engineer. This includes, but is not limited to, septic tanks, fuel tanks, sewer lines or leach lines, storm drains and water fines. Any buried structures or utilities not to be abandoned should be brought to the attention of the Geotechnical Engineer so that he may determine if any special recommendation will be necessary. All water wells which will be abandoned should be backfilled and capped in accordance to the requirements set forth by the Geotechnical Engineer. The top of the cap should be at least 4 feet below finish grade or 3 C%XVE 3070831.01 April 16, 2008 Appendix B - 3 feet below the bottom of footing whichever is greater. The type of cap will depend on the diameter of the well and should be determined by the Geotechnical Engineer and /or a qualified Structural Engineer. FILL MATERIAL Materials to be placed in the fill shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer and shall be free of vegetable matter and other deleterious substances. Granular soil shall contain sufficient fine material to fill the voids. The definition and disposition of oversized rocks and expansive or detrimental soils are covered in the geotechnical report or Special Provisions. Expansive soils, soils of poor gradation, or soils with low strength characteristics may be thoroughly [nixed with other soils to provide satisfactory fill material, but only with the explicit consent of the Geotechnical Engineer. Any import material shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer before being brought to the site. PLACING AND COMPACTION OF FILL Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in layers not to exceed 6 inches in compacted thickness. Each layer shall have a uniform moisture content in the range that will allow the compaction effort to be efficiently applied to achieve the specified degree of compaction. Each layer shall be uniformly compacted to the specified minimum degree of compaction with equipment of adequate size to economically compact the layer. Compaction equipment should either be specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability. The minimum degree of compaction to be achieved is specified in either the Special Provisions or the recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report. When the structural fill material includes rocks, no rocks will be allowed to nest and all voids must be carefully filled with soil such that the minimum degree of compaction recommended in the Special Provisions is achieved. The maximum size and spacing of rock permitted in structural fills and in non - structural fills is discussed in the geotechnical report, when applicable. Field observation and compaction tests to estimate the degree of compaction of the fill will be taken by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative. The location and frequency of the tests shall be at the Geotechnical Engineers discretion. When the compaction test indicates that a particular latver is at less than the required degree of compaction, the layer shall be reworked to the satisfaction of the Geotechnical Engineer and until the desired relative compaction has been obtained. Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. Compaction by sheepsfoot roUer shall be at vertical intervals of not greater than four feet. In addition, till slopes at a ratio of CWE 2070831.01 April 16, 2008 appendix B - 4 two horizontal to one vertical or flatter, should be trackrolled. Steeper till slopes shall be over -built and cut- back to finish contours after the slope has been constructed. Slope compaction operations shall result in all Fill material six or more inches inward from the finished face of the slope having a relative compaction of at least 90 percent of maximum dry density or the degree of compaction specified in the Special Provisions section of this specification. The compaction operation on the slopes shall be continued until the Geotechnical Engineer is of the opinion that the slopes will be surfrcially stable. Density tests in the slopes will be made by the Geotechnical Engineer during construction of the slopes to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Where failing tests occur or other held problems arise, the Contractor will be notified that day of such conditions by written communication from the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative in the form of a daily held report. If the method of achieving the required slope compaction selected by the Contractor fails to produce the necessary results, the Contractor shall rework or rebuild such slopes until the required degree of compaction is obtained, at no cost to the Owner or Geotechnical Engineer. CUT SLOPES The Engineering Geologist shall inspect cut slopes excavated in rock or hthified formational material during the grading operations at intervals determined at his discretion. If any conditions not anticipated in the preliminary report such as perched water, seepage, lenticular or confined strata of a potentially adverse nature, unfavorably inclined bedding, joints or fault planes are encountered during grading, these conditions shall be analyzed by the Engineering Geologist and Geotechnical Engineer to determine if mitigating measures are necessary. Unless otherwise specified in the geotechnical report, no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency. ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Field observation by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative shall be made during the filling and compaction operations so that he can express his opinion regarding the conformance of the grading with acceptable standards of practice. Neither the presence of the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative or the observation and testing shall release the Grading Contractor from his duty to compact all fill material to the specified degree of compaction. CWE 2070831.01 April 16, 2008 Appendix B - 5 SEASON LIMITS Fill shall not be placed dining unfavorable weather conditions. When work is interrupted by heavy rain, filling operations shall not be resumed until the proper moisture content and density of the fill materials can be achieved. Damaged site conditions resulting from weather or acts of God shall be repaired before acceptance of work. RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS - SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATIVE COMPACTION: The minimum degree of compaction to be obtained in compacted natural ground, compacted fill, and compacted backfill shall be at least 90 percent. For street and parking lot subgrade, the upper twelve inches should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. EXPANSIVE SOILS: Detrimentally expansive soil is defined as clayey soil which has an expansion index of 50 or greater when tested in accordance with the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) Laboratory Test D4829 -95. OVERSIZED MATERIAL-• Oversized fill material is generally defined herein as rocks or lumps of soil over six inches in diameter. Oversized materials should not be placed in fill unless recommendations of placement of such material are provided by the Geotechnical Engineer. At least 40 percent of the fill soils shall pass through a No. 4 U.S. Standard Sieve. TRANSITION LOTS: Where transitions between cut and fill occur within the proposed building pad, the cut portion should be undercut a minimum of one foot below the base of the proposed footings and recompacted as structural backfill. In certain cases that would be addressed in the geotechnical report, special footing reinforcement or a combination of special footing reinforcement and undercutting may be required. N I w _e Sampo Enaineering, Inc, —0 Land Planning, Civil Engineering, s DRAINAGE STUDY FOR CASE NO. 09-037 CDP /BA GAFNER RESIDENCE 950 SAXONY ROAD LEUCADIA, CA 92024 APN: 254- 362 -79 AUr- August 25, 2009 j.n. 09 -110 1034 Second Street ♦ Encinitas, CA 92024 • phone: 760 - 436 -0660 ♦ fax: 760 - 436 -0659 info @sampoengineering.com 1 N I Alk Sampo Engineering, Inc. W+ _ E Land Plannin g, Civil Engineering, Surveying, Mapping T j.n. 09 -110 S August 25, 2009 DRAINAGE STUDY FOR: CDPBA 09-037,950 Saxony Road, Leucadia, CA 92024, APN: 254- 362 -79 Criteria: 1. Use the current County of San Diego Hydrology Manual "Rational Method" 2. Design for a 100 -year frequency storm using the County of San Diego 6 hour and 24 hour precipitation isopluvials. 3. Runoff coefficients are based on soil type "D ". "C" factors have been weighted based on the individual "C" factors for different surfaces (i.e. concrete= 0.95), and the areas of the individual surfaces. 4. Times of concentration (Tc) are determined from the urban overland flow formula. 5. Refer to the attached drainage map for basin areas and locations. Introduction: 1. The subject property is 1.0 gross acres and is located on the westerly side of Saxony Road at the intersection with Leucadia Blvd., in the City of Encinitas. The property is currently developed with a single- family residence, detached garage with a dwelling unit above, and associated improvements such as hardscape, landscaping, etc. The property descends from Saxony Road at an approximate grade of 3 percent to the westerly limit of the subject property. 2. The project proposes to demolish the existing single- family residence, detached garage with dwelling unit above, and any associated improvements, and construct a new single - family residence, driveway, and associated improvements. The driveway is to be constructed of permeable pavers. Grass or rock -lined swales are to be constructed adjacent to the proposed driveway for post- construction BMP purposes. In addition, two private infiltration basins will be constructed to detain the flow increase expected from the increase in impervious surface. 1034 Second Street ♦ Encinitas, CA 92024 • phone: 760A36 -0660 ♦ fax: 760 - 436 -0659 info@sampoengincering.com DRAINAGE STUDY CALCULATOR JN: 09-110 ;GAFNER DATE: ugust 25, 2009 INITIALS: JO DESCRIPTION: Subject property tributary to westerly and southerly property lines AREA = 42,818 SF = 0.983 AC. C = 0.35(39.439 SF) + 0.95(3,379 SF) 42,818 SF TC1 = 1.8(1.1- .35)(188)"(1 /2) 18_51 (4.0) "(1/3) 1.59 1100 = 7.44(2.5)(11.7) "( -.645) = 3.81 Q100 = (0.40)(3.81 1N /HR)(0.983 AC) _ = 0.40 = 11.7 IN /HR MINUTES JN: 09 -110 GAFNER DATE: 'August 25, 2009 INITIALS:'JO DESCRIPTION: Subject property tributary to westerly and southerly property lines 42,818 SF = 0.983 AC. C = 0.35(34.287 SF) + 0.55(4,401 SF) + 0.95(4 130 S = 0.43 42,818 SF TC1 = 1.8(1.1 - .35)(114) "(1 /2) 14_41 = 9.5 (3.5) "(1/3) 1.52 1100 = 7.44(2.5)(9.5) "( -.645) = 4.36 IN /HR 100 = (0.43)(4.36 IN/HR)(0.983 AC) _ MINUTES INFILTRATION BASIN SIZING Cpre : = 0.40 Cpost : = 0.43 AC : = Cpost - Cpre AC = 0.03 P6: =25 in Tc: =5.0 minutes (assumed) 1:= 7.44•P6•Tc 0.645 I = 659 inches /hour A =0.983 acres AQ:= AC•I.A AQ = 0.194 cfs V: = 1.5-2.7.AQ.(Tc-60) V = 236 cubic feet (required storage) 09 -110 Gafner 08/25/2009 JO A = entire site acreage (acres) C = coefficient of runoff (dimensionless) I = rainfall intensity P6 = 6 hour precipitation Q = rate of runoff (cfs = W3 /sec) Therefore use (2) 10 feet long by 3 feet wide by 4 feet deep infiltration basins. `l m 0 m W C CL 3 m 0 gT_ i o O m } n T -1 r- �bSS vl WATERCOURSE DISTANCE IN FEET OVERLAND FLOW TIME IN MINUTES ...■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ N■■/■ m■■■■ �N■ W■ u■■■■■///■■■■■ nn■■■ ■■nn■■■■■■■■■■■■■n■■n■■n■■■■■■■ County Hydrology , . , ■ s■ ■■■■ ■■e■■■■e ■ ■e■/■ee■■nn ■4■n /■■ ■■■// ean■■■■■■■ne■tl■■■■■■■■■u■■■e ■■■■■■■■■one ■■■■■■/■■■■■ ■tl ■sssss ■mss■ of ■ ■o ■ /s ■mo ■■ ■ft: ■ ■s ■■ /■■oo■o�E= n■os■■WN■ira ■ ■n■■■■■■■NI�■■ ■ ■■■ ■■ ■u■■ ■soon■■■ ■■ ■■/■■■■ nss■s■ i3■■■■■■■■■■■■■ i3■■s■■■■■ n mom ■■■■■■■ s■ o■ n■ F/■■ o■ n■■■ s■■ ■ ■o#■oo ■■■�■ ■s■ ■s / #■/■ soon /■�■■ ■■/■■//■■/■■■■ ien■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ii■■■n■■■N■■■iii■■■■■■■e■■■■■■ loss■ e■ e■■■■ ■ei■■■■e /■■■■■■m■mi■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■/■ n■■/ e■ n■■■/■ nN■■■■■■■■■■■ mom n■■■■■ W■■ e■ ee/ n■■■■■■■■ e■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ / ■■■■■■/■■ ��I�■ tiAi■■R,�111!TVIU 11C11}! L/.■.. sE./■■■ 1■■■■■■ n■ m■/ W■■■■■■■■■l Wtr■■■/ n■ son ■■ nN ■■n■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■E�111�■■ ■ ■ NSEEMS ■sun ■■mNONE ■ ■■/■■■nN om■■■ ■■■■■■n■■ ■■■■nn■■■■■n■■■■■■■■■■ /viii■■ ■■■ ee ■i�lllt�l�■■■l�a / ■■■��■■■■■■■■■ ■■ n■ n■ N■■■■■■■ m■ N■ nne■■■ ■■■■■■■■n■■■■■■■s■e■e■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ ■■/■ ■sWSI! ■ ■a!I /■■di■■�i @Nti1. /m■■■ ■■■■■■■ ■f'.1 i■ PI#7\Z9!�11!I'!\■ Men--- ■■■■/N■■■■■■■■■■■N■■■■■ ■■■■■■■�■■ o■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■mozm ■ ■o ■alto ■i■E eEgl 'v!Ur ■■ ■n s■■ ns■ u-3 li3Cl► �#. �: L' il�Z/■ i�■■ o�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■u■■■■■■i■■■■■■■n■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■snlleE�soimsgEiA INo 11/1996i/4/�i BaY��■�a�ca��r,.��o�ia■i ---.- �--- �-- ___- �-.-- _�------ f�_��ava,w_oa, ---E- �c� ■w�ca■ .a10eMaW. "Mmal .a�aON soiie. ■■■■■■ ■■Ht #■S /iN■@■WNii ■ ■ ■ ■t��3idl ■ ■N ai//■■ n#■! ii9Ekt��/ �' Ji3!! N:/ i2 \ ■m■ ■N ■itai'.` among / ■E ■r,�■■■ /EIE4i #n soon ■ ■ / ■■Gf■mok asa ■a■ ■o■■�+�:.�� ■ it ■n ■ ■■/ ■ ■i�'u ■Wi"ll ■ '' 7■■@// f! tl / ■ ■ir�� ■n ■ ■ ■11�1Q;ais / ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ Mosnesisoni:'•\■ a- ■r.i6imp n ■ ■ro_�a'�� ■A�e l�INs ■ ■si /sss \ ■:If1,3�� r!! ■■ /Lo■o ■ ■osmu ■soElm NUM mom on �nnn ■/�i8 7�s\ 3■ ■ / ■.�. ■o■■ /■ ■ice �iro1l ■�E� ■■ , ■! ■mss ■ ■ ■ ■Els / ■t! fpia / ■o ■o ■ES ■ ■■ 0 NONE�MOM Ns1E�i� 1�ON WWIMo ,L's ■■iisim�■10 Q /SP, � ■�L lia \fL�.�oo @C��E loom mom Nunn ■ ■■■■■■■Wen■■■■i�u■■ ■ ■o ■ ■■■n■Somme ► am m ■m ■ /n a■uee.cl•A■r�■aatyam ■ ■ct■ r1 ■9 ■11r��.c■ �aoioFean ■gin 'mkt■mr,� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■sn��roil�> ■ ■■/■■ 1 Loma■■ nnr� agl�s ■■ ■ ■ ■n ■a�a ■�c��an.��ait+�al�+.�m ■a■/■ ■ ■. ■w \ ■ ■ \rltoia�■■■ ■ ■I� ■r�. / ■ ■■■ ■■ ■atl/�tJ oC■e noon n■/■■ nINKI N■ 6IINisFf■ o�T'# H■ ti�Ans�l nt; a± 7 ■W■�i+r�1/[ /d�■■■Ml�lCnti�isis@ 11//1! /EN ■ ■e■■ /n■ ■■■ ■■ ■[A * "iIG■■/■■■/■■■nn■►�i■,%F50!T / \en /ose ■ ■ /s\� lE/■■\■'aI -I� \ s�s■r �'a nil llb/ mm■■■u.,,q INS ■/1mt Nn// /Nige °.I ■■n�iall�Il! \Ellin /Vli�■■ �/ 100 Year Rainfall Event - 24 Hours .. u ■G Zh ill ■5A ■111J■■n■■■n■N■i . r --, , rieti\s■EmIns ai ■�l■/m ■s>z ■ice■■■■ ■■■■■memo/■■■■■■ >a say..■ Mier ■ emel n ■■■■■■ ■■■■n■■■ n��:•�ua�l■ ■ ►r■oW■ ■ ■ ■ ■I� ■ ■ ■n■■n■ ■■/■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.:r�.aean� !'Jwi.m�,in�aw \I�i ■ ■■ ■ n■on■■■■i.'�emcli■al■i�si.r9m :�■ Ir a. ■■■■■■■■nom■■ ■s ■o■E■■■■■■s■■G::ri�Lr. - �o■I��::� Seri ! ■..N�■■■■m■■■n►\u /s�leF■R�9o■/ it■ @� @9� a moo■■■■■■o■s■ ■■■■ eees■ ■ee/ ■■s■ NNE e■■e■ wMilli a_tM�i� i i�looln ■ ■ W■lirs►t�i e/r■■iINA ■■■ � w ��EMSg■een■■W■!■u■■u now 1 lID■■3tes ■■eG ■!I!! __�!•�eAae■n/�o■■�■lie ■■N■■ ■ e■ n�e■ an■ e■■■■ r� ■am �e■l� ■■■��:� ■n:: -� ■ ■ / ■ ■ r /�1Emo0 �m■■ S■ouu ■E■ 1210 @s■AeS W- 4! lli■ia!iitr l■ et■lll� Ci■ a■J■l■!R ■mss m WE 11021111MIXEME s■■ ■■ions s ■ ! :, ■■ '. is � ■� ■! .. � F ■ . . I C ■ s ■ ■ ■ /n ■n■■■n F, a l; .Ea■■N NiNXI NPmm s / / /■■sm■emN■■ ss ■ ■ W llil r UVA- rrFELmq Iti :4i. Cj0Ij an nN ■ ■etnsle n■■■ en■■ n■■ W� , rnlle * \ ■n ■■�tS'ti.'s:'��I ■ ■e ■>.�i/ urn■■ a■vel;e■e■ale�►nn ■en■■■ //n■Ion■ ■■nne■■■on■naaeim■;„.►tF.��.ee ■` i��ir �/�al■neeer.�in■ \■un■earQn�■!e■ ■►�en■l�■■■n eonse■ee■■■e ■! \■■■MME -a�Il�,�. see•►:.>„a ■ ■�c ■■/.i ■e■ ■e■■m■eeIP&MINrt Enos 010918"M L111- Ilea 'ineesoos ■ / ■ / ■ / ■n ■Ci ■W ►a:.��1 R_■/flliEAtlsld�La.:r::,� ■/s sso ■IF■seommu■■wLln /Eo iC�Aom1, Boom 11110011100 r ■W[i7s ■o• +1aiN�a' ■■ seer. i�E' R+ 'APIf"iJ!less ■i►Wfi ■ ■Ef't^'�■E° Isis /Flo►!■sLiuiMIW ■i ■oRll ■s ■ ■■ / s ■sun s ■ ■e■ ■ ■ ■nsn ■ / ■ ■on■ ■e \i,l /4oi? ISO%>_•' �ti><° i�' 1# 9G\■ e/ !!ie ■�i■oollti ■ ■ ■E� @ ■6rsX4sair: �.��llhio#en ■ ■n■ ■mono ■ ■i /memo onooh ■■ .Mc,*a1aInNS ■I!►w�AWr�J ■�toe� lC�ii ■■'as ■ile0ds ■ ■■l1e / ■►1i ■@Ins ■mssi�isi,Uioni■■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ es■■ sH ■=mom ■ ■o ■ii/s■mosnl'.i�'�'J■s ■IC t �o■■�/�5oarnampls9 ,� �� ••klOC .:d_�F►�91E /N■■r <#■■i!! @E'� #w \sninislMS■/diim■.a■nn■■e■■ n ■ ■ ■ssss /s ■s■■mss s ■i■n■eo V. -- cams .., ■o sM�r!■s. ■lmta�aasnie■Ilrn:\/■!aa ■naNUMNEM mom ■/ ■■se■■mo ■■■/in■■nei�m■■■Et1l�1: AN Ell IR ►i'1 /riNir�JI9lI ■■■r.AA■�M93 a a■oo /■■■�■�is son ■ ■ ■e■ ■■nss■■ a ■ ■n ■s ■ ■osn ■ ■ ■I /rj?,LXi\ /m�al!'� �lilf� ?'- a:7!�ie ■■ ■■Q►lf>2ieo■Eeo ■onesir: ■mo o ■iii ®@C!' Em o SUES ■s�\ ■ ■ ■ ■� / ■ an 0H■■ 0000■■ /so ■name`GSl'►i�.►;�!«.ir � "- �°"!f1'�o ►il•��._P� _..�o�aPNilia s■ s■ o■ ns■ oonsns■ nn■ ms■ ell r► 1�1 n '!*u/►Kar�■�8rf ■ ■H / ■llt� a►.= �'sqo ■W ■s \�i/t!@ o ■oii� \Ra nosoon ■e■■ nos■■ n■ a ■e■W■■e■cn.�►�►ri!`-- a'«iuo �ciWicir �a�tn•■-3■ ■ ■�■ ■ ■o ■a.Itoono ■tle■a■ae■n ■era■ ss■ sssosnoseossoss ■ ■ ■ssoe ■ ■ ■!1�'; Ills *rici. /�►USS9sleo�e■sdll Fig son �s■�nmo ■!s■■■a■o lose Dose■ ■ ■o■ril►' ■■ ■ ■tiri�lW ■neo /e ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■sssee ■ ■n ■sss ■!I ■ ■YF �►.. f �w�s� i■u" n�■.� Ji.►� _ ,- -- �F F ll�lnonso ■eo■s■sN■ su■m ■e ■ ■o■�Uns mono W■ WSWn o ■o■■noesiL ■N■ssot ■ ■Ong »�� a r .. �� rw i � � �. l°lrs� J i '��- o ;' `il 14ii�[■ s .■.e ll�iaW �/iGu�U es ■ ■m Entl e?t 9e■ ■st? \s.ez o :29F ■ /n am ®■o■ ■■iT in ► � ,��/ooq■■oE??i!/o ( �Wn lialNNRen/e /oils si�■ laai■sesle s■li■/ = ■W Noo■ ■ �■eI■■ ■■ Psilt l�i 1■��9d■LNfw�IZi- N SEEM r< _ GIS —%�� T- ■■ o■oa ■o ms i ■i.► .R" e iV.• • ' .: ��P' ■AELI P P. �� ■ us a ■ tmi■l a 8�mmome■■m n 011 ■�■s ■u. /omNo n■■ ■ e■■e ■■/no Nn■ ■ ■s■ ■sos■ on ■ ■ ■ ■■e ■i� s� ■/■■ a♦ s- �o■ntiiys6o■ �N■ � � :.6■ /n■ i■/ice an lion e■e: ■v■■m■■■■m /■ W/e/o■ i■� ■■yen r■ n ■i:VII� ■. u ■sW /WO ■ /■■ /esoss ■en ■ ■� a- sauq� \� ■■oo:/iuis� l5ft� 21 UIR ■ 41MIS1 ■ill lllR��:i �I■■■es■e- t lesN■■■■■■000■■ man = :..i ■■ nss in ■ ■ens ■osiu an ■ ■sss aa� :+��F■,�bIE�ECiI ■only■ ■c: ■v �1rf1 ■ ■�oo■e■=ss ■nommoss ■so■■ ■ ■ ,:a ■aB� � ■■ ..� ■■e■ �i ■■lnFl■G ■r�W■N ■ ■■n■soeo■■■ ■o■ ■■n�sr�nn/■n� lino �iie■mono ■■ W■■e■■n■■ u•'�• °: mails W■n inNein■■�� uWn ■enai■■nu■n■■rmi■nn■n■■■■n■■N■ :aE,a.u/cn- ■n■■■n■■■■N■■n■ ��!/Weunn ■e■W N■■eun■■ Wen ■■Wn■■u /uuenueN■W■nWn■■■W■■■■/e ■ ■i ■iii■ moo ■nn■■r\ ■■■n■■�n,�;;■t�m■ ■nn■/t�W■n■■ ■■■■ee■■e■■■■■■ i ■iiNORM Nonni n ■ ■E ■■f Ions ■n i iei■i "niiiiie -i ■iii iiii u■ ■n ■i■ ■oou ■ / ■en ■■ ■■ Alti■■n■ 32 �• ............ % - r % j LIZ! Rainfalllsopluvials .33'15 f 33,15' - .... �• 100 Year Rainfall Event - 6 Hours • � ` _- I ,:. � _ _ ter., -_ i - OCEANSIDE' Z t.. so lu 'al (inches � S I • o� � � -yam CARLSBAO r •--t -t rT.. r ,�. g. c- 33 900' so�ANA BC _ : • —' _.`H ._ W _S_ —_ SA COUMY, ,f I f'4W, Y � _ © oE<_ 7 n I I r \ r • r • • t i °45' :. • a 32 T i 5 ovE ♦ RO j. 1 — • •� 5� ; 3 5 ! _- -�G S M(i IS - _ _.• ;r+j• � . ' r Q} ._... -T- •I G hM,PYv WE Ha, San lhcgu Cnv<rc. ! - - ', T'r- 1 -• • ♦• O -� • -• r•• ! _ _ i N THIS MM IS PROVIDED WRNOUT WARRANTY OF MY MIND EITHER E%PRESS OOR IMPLIED. INCLUDING. OUT NOT LIMREO TO. THE IMPLIED WMRMITIES r -- r�/•� 4) /�•-, `r/ (� ♦• � • .. _. ,__ -. _- LT -... ^N SS FOR.. PMTIOI PURPoSE. _ R7 777 Y • • r ♦ •l� i .'•• ♦ -..• _i _ -_ C° IpM 5anG15AR/J RgANDRFI P _ r i - '� •♦ - ♦' ' M T 1 •/• . r C; _•: Tlra n ° N Im rM SMDPG l Ft — S u " n M.l cY eMI °wtE �_ - —t R, pu me SMOAG n °. . ee rRnRna eag marc pEmy «rs I °30' --s— T Mmuoan Bo° n Mearp32 - 32 °30' S -_ o -- �_. 3 0 3 Miles Dam " /I C =0.40 t = 18t A = 0.993 AC On = 1.5 Us pmso " /I C OW CITY OF ENCINITAS ENC / = 436 /Af/W IMW & PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAPS FOR: A= aW AC GAMER RESIDENCE QlW = 1.8 US 950 SAXONY ROAD CASE NO,. 09-037 COP/BA d AWING NO. XXX-G pQ I % PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP pmso " /I C OW CITY OF ENCINITAS ENC / = 436 /Af/W IMW & PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAPS FOR: A= aW AC GAMER RESIDENCE QlW = 1.8 US 950 SAXONY ROAD CASE NO,. 09-037 COP/BA d AWING NO. XXX-G pQ ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City Capitol Improvement Projects JJ JJ District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. 103231 / 1 T Name of Project GAFM� R RESI DEW - Name of Developer 57AtJ G AFAI ER Site Location 950 Sf Y wJ4 R(>Ab (address ...number ...street name I ...suffix) Ootl (bldg) I have inspected the grading at the subje4t site and qave verified certification of the pad by the Engineer of Work, DouLG LoGgfl , dated —Zg /0, and certification of soil compaction by the Soil Engineer,CH2K PIN NOW dated -3 I am hereby satisfied that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, Chapter 23.24 of the Municipal Code, and any other applicable engineering standards and specific project requirements. Based on my observation and the certifications, I take no exception to the issuance of a building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public Improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy. I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (Le., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the aboroved nlans and specifications. 8 - -- y - - -10 foate) — — (Signature of 5entor CIVll Engineer, only if approprate) (Date) Reference: Building Permit No. - -- Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. ]SG /field3.doc I TEL 760-633-2600 1 FAX 760 -633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TOO 760633.2700 0 recyded paper City of Encinitm 505 South Vulcan .Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 Tel 760 -633- 2600•Fa 760- 943 -2226 TDD 760633 -2700 • %�vxi.encinitasxa.us Field Clearance to Allow Occupancy TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Building Permit No. /l / -- /2 --01 Name of Project (�;74rnlE)z ,LESI6e -7-ILE Name of Developer S'7�4 �1 C A-Fn.l GF;2 Fire Building Planning Engineering I have inspected the site at 7 �z? SAYO address... number street nano suffix and have determined that finish (precise) grading (lot no.) (bldg. no.) and any other related site improvements are substantially complete and that occupancy is merited. Signal ofEngi ring inspector Date Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if appropriate Date Reference: Engineering Permit No/b3z '76 Special Note: Please do not sign the 'blue card' that is issued by Building Inspection Division and given to the developer. You are only being asked to verify field conditions. Office staff still has the responsibility to verify that compliance with administrative requirements is achieved, typically payment of impact fees or execution of documents. Return this form, if completed, to counter staff by dropping it in the slot labeled 'Final Inspection". Also, please remember to do final inspections on the related engineering permits and return that paperwork, if completed. Thank you. Oq,037CDP RANCHO COASTAL ENGINEERING Single Source Development Consultant March 5, 2010 City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: NEW ENGINEER OF WORK— THE GAFNER RESIDENCE CITY OF ENCINITAS DRAWING NO. 10323 -G To Whom It May Concern: Pursuant to a mutual agreement between the applicant/owner, Mr. & Mrs. Gafner and Sampo Engineering, Inc. and in accordance with Section 23.24.360 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, please be advised that Rancho Coastal Engineering, Inc. is hereby assuming interest as "Engineer of Work" in the above referenced Grading Permit. Rancho Coastal Engineering, Inc. is formally assuming responsibility for the construction, potential plan changes and final "as- builts" for the subject project. The original grading plan design and supporting documentation will still be the responsibility of Sampo Engineering, Inc. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact this office at your COASTAL ENGINEERING, INC. E. Logan, R.C.E. 39726 Principal G3ffm E9L 12 -31.11 Planning Civil Survey Structural Rancho Coastal Engineenng, Inc. 1635S. Rancho Santa Fe Rd., Ste. 204, San Marcos, CA 92076 Phone (760)510-3152. Fax: (760) 510 -3153 www.rcesd.com r Fidelity National Title Company AUG 2 9 2009 PRELIMINARY REPORT In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Fidelity National Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of title insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CL TA and AL TA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, a California corporation. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the land. Fidelity National Title Company BY ATTEST Countersigned Seoelary CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17106) Fidelity National Title Company 2763 Camino Del Rio South San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 295 -7332 FAX (619) 297 -2213 PRELIMINARY REPORT TITLE OFFICER: Jerry Digdigan / (619- 725 -2112) TO: ORDER NO.: 09- 4201584 LOAN NO.: SHORT TERM RATE: No PROPERTY ADDRESS: Vacant land located in, Encinitas, California EFFECTIVE DATE: June 17, 2009, 07:30 A.M. The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is: California Land Title Association Standard Coverage Policy - 1990 ALTA Loan Policy (6/17/06) 1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A Fee 2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: Stanley D. Gafner 3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT "ONE" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF LN1SR 07/01/2009 1 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) Order No. 09- 4201584 LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "ONE" THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: That portion of Lot 15 of Hillside Acres, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1992, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, January 25, 1927, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of the Easterly 100.00 feet of the Southerly 105.00 feet of said Lot 15, said point bears North 00 °43 '361ast, 33.50 feet from the Southwest corner thereof; thence parallel with the Southerly line of said Lot 15, South 89014 ' 13'East, 63.59 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Northerly having a radius of 1330.00 feet; thence Easterly 36.42 feet along said curve through a central angle of 01 034 '08 "to the Easterly line of said Lot 15; thence along the Easterly line thereof, North 00 043 '36 "East, 71.00 feet to the Northerly line of the Southerly 105.00 feet of said Lot 15; thence along the Northerly line thereof, North 89 °14 '13 "West, 100.00 feet to said Westerly line of the Easterly 100.00feet; thence along said Westerly line, South 00 °43 '36'West, 71.50 feet to the Point of Beginning. Assessor's Parcel No: 254- 362 -76 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17106) ITEMS: (Continued) Order No. 09- 4201584 AT THE DATE HEREOF, ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AND EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records, (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims, (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2009 -2010. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (Commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation code of the State of California. CLTA Preliminary Report Form • Modified (11/17/06) ITEMS: (Continued) Order No. 09- 4201584 8. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as reserved in a document; Reserved by: Joseph J. Thomas and Anna Mary Thomas, husband and wife Purpose: sewer, water, gas, power and telephone lines Recorded: March 14, 1961, Instrument No. 45510, of Official Records Affects: As shown in said document. Reference is made to said document for full particulars. Said easement has been granted and /or reserved in various deeds of record. 9. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as reserved in a document; Reserved by: City of Encinitas Purpose: landscape and maintenance Recorded: May 20, 2004, Instrument No. 2004 - 0464003, of Official Records Affects: As shown in said document. Reference is made to said document for full particulars. 10. The community interest of the spouse of the vestee named below. Vestee: Stanley D. Gafner 11. In order to complete this report, this Company requires a Statement of Information to be completed by the following party, Party: Stanley D. Gafner The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested Statement(s) of Information. 12. This company will require a statement of information from the parties named below in order to complete this report, based on the effect of documents, proceedings, liens, decrees, or other matters which do not specifically describe said land, but which, if any do exist, may affect the title or impose liens or encumbrances thereon. After review of the requested Statement(s) of Information the Company may have additional requirements before the issuance of any policy of title insurance. Parties: The Buyers in this Transaction (Note: The statement of information is necessary to complete the search and examination of title under this order. Any title search includes matters that are indexed by name only, and having a completed statement of information assists the Company in the elimination of certain matters which appear to involve the parties but in fact affect another party with the same or similar name. Be assured that the statement of information is essential and will be kept strictly confidential to this file). END OF ITEMS Note 1. The charge for a policy of title insurance, when issued through this title order, will be based on the Basic (not Short-Term) Title Insurance Rate. 4 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/05) ITEMS: (Continued) Order No. 09- 4201584 Note 2. Property taxes for the fiscal year shown below are PAID. For proration purposes the amounts are: APN: Fiscal year 1 st Installment: 2nd Installment: Exemption: Land: Improvements: Personal Property Code Area: 254- 362 -76 2008 -2009 $187.08 PAID $187.08 PAID $None $34,636.00 $0.00 $None 19079 Note 3. If property taxes are posted paid less than 45 days from the issuance of the policy contemplated by this report, the Company will hold the amount of the tax, plus delinquency and penalty until verification of payment is received. If verification has not been received within 45 days of the issuance of the policy contemplated, the Company will pay the taxes due. If property taxes have been paid through an impound account and we are furnished written confirmation of same or you can provide a copy of the canceled check, this requirement may be waived. If a monthly payment for any deed of trust to be paid in full is made less than 30 days from the issuance of the policy contemplated by this report, the Company will hold an amount equal to that payment until verification of payment is received from the lender. If verification has not been received within 30 days of the issuance of the policy contemplated, the funds held will be forwarded to the lender. If a canceled check or other form of proof of payment can be furnished, this requirement may be waived. Note 4. If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate broker, real estate agent or association provides a copy of a declaration, governing document or deed to any person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding any unlawful restrictions. Said statement is to be in at least 14 -point bold face type and may be stamped on the first page of any document provided or included as a cover page attached to the requested document. Should a party to this transaction request a copy of any document reported herein that fits this category, the statement is to be included in the manner described. Note 5. Wiring instructions for Fidelity National Title Company, San Diego, California, are follows: Receiving Bank: Bank of America NT &SA, 333 South Beaudry Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90017 -1466 Bank ABA No.: 026009593 Beneficiary: Fidelity National Title Account No. 050. 7916151 Reference Title Officer: Jerry Digdigan Title Order No. 4201584 These wiring instructions are for this specific transaction involving the title Department of the San Diego office of Fidelity National Title. These instructions therefore should not be used in other transactions without first verifying the information with our accounting department. Its is imperative that the wire text be exactly as indicated. Any extraneous information may cause unnecessary delays in confirming the receipt of funds. Note 6. The current owner does NOT qualify for the $20.00 discount pursuant to the coordinated stipulated judgments entered in actions filed by both the Attorney General and private class action plaintiffs for the herein described property. CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17106) ITEMS: (Continued) Order No. 09. 4201584 END OF NOTES CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17106) ATTACHMENT ONE AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6 -1 -87) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: land use improvements on the land land division environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the Public records at policy date. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless: a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the Policy Date the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you if you bought the land without knowledge of the taking In addition to the Exclusions, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and the expenses resulting from: 1. Any rights, interests, or claims of parties in possession of the land not shown by the public records. 2. Any easements or liens not shown by the public records. This does not limit the lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks. 3. Title Risks that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date - unless they appeared in the public records that result in no loss to you that first affect your title after the Policy Date - this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your title. 5. Lack of a right: to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A or in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks. 3. Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. This does not limit the forced removal coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks. 4. Any water rights or claims or title to water in or under the land, whether or not shown by the public records. Attachment One 111!17/061 ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. SCHEDULE B, PART I EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: I]a1 40 Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the public records. Attachment One )1l /11 /06) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10- 17 -92) WITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT -FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgement or lien creditor. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. Attachment One (11/1]/05) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) 2006 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (06- 17 -06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusionl(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing- business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth -in- lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b). The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. Attachment One (11111106( ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10- 17 -92) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy, or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgement or lien creditor. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. S. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. Attachment One (11117/06) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) 2006 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (06- 17 -06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. Attachment One (11 /17 106) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10- 22 -03) ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10- 22.03) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and regulations concerning: a, building b. zoning c. Land use d. improvements on Land e. Land division f. environmental protection This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14, 15, 16, 17 or 24. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless: a. notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date; or b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they appear in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that First occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 18. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows: For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Attachment One (11/1 ) /06) Your Deductible Our Maximum Dollar Amount Limit of Liability Covered 1.00% of Policy $ 10.000.00 Risk 14: Amount or $ 2.500.00 (Whichever is less) Covered 1.00% of Policy $ 25.000.00 Risk 15: Amount or $ 5.000.00 (Whichever is less) Covered 1.00 %of Policy $ 25.000.00 Risk 16: Amount or $ 5.000.00 (Whichever is less) Covered 1.00% of Policy $ 5.000.00 Risk 18: Amount or $ 2.500.00 (Whichever is less) Attachment One (11/1 ) /06) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (10/13/01) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvements now or hereafter erected on the Land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or areas of the Land or any parcel of which the Land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (this paragraph does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 8, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, except as provided in Covered Risk 27, or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Real property taxes or assessments of any governmental authority which become a lien on the Land subsequent to Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 7, 8(e) and 26. 7. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to advances or modifications made after the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk B. B. Lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to each and every advance made after Date of Policy, and all interest charged thereon, over liens, encumbrances and other matters affecting the title, the existence of which are Known to the Insured at (a) The time of the advance; or (b) The time a modification is made to the terms of the Insured Mortgage which changes the rate of interest charged, if the rate of interest is greater as a result of the modification than it would have been before the modification. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk B. 9. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion thereof to have been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at Date of Policy. Attachment One 0 1/17106) Effective Date: 5/1/2008 Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Privacy Statement Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ( "FNF ") respect the privacy and security of your non - public personal information ( "Personal Information ") and protecting your Personal Information is one of our top priorities. This Privacy Statement explains FNF's privacy practices, including how we use the Personal Information we receive from you and from other specified sources, and to whom it may be disclosed. FNF follows the privacy practices described in this Privacy Statement and, depending on the business performed, FNF companies may share information as described herein. Personal Information Collected We may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: Information we receive from you on applications or other forms, such as your name, address, social security number, tax identification number, asset information, and income information; Information we receive from you through our Internet websites, such as your name, address, email address, Internet Protocol address, the website links you used to get to our websites, and your activity while using or reviewing our websites; Information about your transactions with or services performed by us, our affiliates, or others, such as information concerning your policy, premiums, payment history, information about your home or other real property, information from lenders and other third parties involved in such transaction, account balances, and credit card information; and Information we receive from consumer or other reporting agencies and publicly recorded documents. Disclosure of Personal Information We may provide your Personal Information (excluding information we receive from consumer or other credit reporting agencies) to various individuals and companies, as permitted by law, without obtaining your prior authorization. Such laws do not allow consumers to restrict these disclosures. Disclosures may include, without limitation, the following: To insurance agents, brokers, representatives, support organizations, or others to provide you with services you have requested, and to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure in connection with an insurance transaction; To third -party contractors or service providers for the purpose of determining your eligibility for an insurance benefit or payment and /or providing you with services you have requested; To an insurance regulatory authority, or a law enforcement or other governmental authority, in a civil action, in connection with a subpoena or a governmental investigation; To companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or to other financial institutions with which we have joint marketing agreements and /or To lenders, lien holders, judgment creditors, or other parties claiming an encumbrance or an interest in title whose claim or interest must be determined, settled, paid or released prior to a title or escrow closing. We may also disclose your Personal Information to others when we believe, in good faith, that such disclosure is reasonably necessary to comply with the law or to protect the safety of our customers, employees, or property and /or to comply with a judicial proceeding, court order or legal process. Page 1 of 2 Sampo Engineeringjnc. Land Planning, Civil Fngineering, Surveying, Mapping page 1 of 1 S CITY OF ENCINITAS j.n. 09 -110 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE November 11, 2009 FOR GAFNER RESIDENCE GRADING PLAN 10323 -G 950 SAXONY ROAD LEUCADIA, CA APN: 254- 362 -79 DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST TOTAL Grading - Export & Fill 70 CY $27.50 $1,925.00 Grading - Excavate & Embankment 380 CY $20.00 $7,600.00 4" PCC Sidewalk 1559 SF $5.00 $7,795.00 6" Curb & Gutter (G -2) 277 LF $20.00 $5,540.00 PCC Driveway (G -14) 739 SF $7.00 $5,173.00 4" Thick AC Pavement 1477 SF $1.75 $2,584.75 Class II base (6 ") 4386 SF $1.00 $4,386.00 3" Thick Layer Gravel 3070 SF $1.00 $3,070.00 PCC Flush Curb 254 LF $5.00 $1,270.00 6" PCC Curb (G -1) 16 LF $20.00 $320.00 4" PVC Perforated Storm Drain 25 LF $20.00 $500.00 12 "x12" HOPE Catch Basin by'NDS' 2 EA $83.78 $167.56 Concete Masonry Retaining Wall (C -1) 450 SF $29.65 $13,342.50 Landscaped Swales 530 LF $5.50 $2,915.00 Silt Fence 600 LF $1.60 $960.00 Gravelbags 250 EA $1.10 $275.00 Stabilized construction entrance 400 SF $5.25 $2,100.00 DEC 10 2009 SUBTOTAL $59,923.81 No. 44173 #P'6- 30-11' 10% CONTINGENCY $5,99238 r� J �P 9l OF� O \FP TOTAL $65,916.19 1034 Second Street, Encinitas, CA 92024 info @sampoengineering.com RANCHO COASTAL ENGINEERING Single Source Development Consultant _ March 21, 2010 City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 MAO 2 2 2010 RE: NEW ENGINEER OF WORK —THE GAFNER RESIDENCE CITY OF ENCINITAS DRAWING NO. 10323 -G To Whom It May Concern: In accordance with Section 23.24 -360 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, please be advised that in reference to the above stated plans, Rancho Coastal Engineering, Inc., as new Engineer of Work, assumes responsibility and liability for the drawings, in accordance with the Rules of the Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, California Code of Regulations, Title 16, Div. 5, and the items as outlined on the Statement of Engineer of Work as shown on the subject plans. Should youirdve any questions or comments, please feel free to contact this office at your Douglas E. Logan, R.C.E. 39726 Principal Civil INC. �o C 39, 2e Exp. 1231 -11 Structural Rancho Coastal Engineering, Inc. 1635 S. Rancho Santa Fe Rd., Ste. 204, San Marcos, CA 92078 Phone (760) 510 -3152, Fax: (760) 510.3153 www.rcesd.com oq -037 CD? /6A l b 3a3 - G. June 9, 2010 a ,L ]k City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: NEW ENGINEER OF WORK AND SOILS ENGINEER — THE GAFNER RESIDENCE, CITY OF ENCINITAS DRAWING NO. 10323 -G To Whom It May Concern: Please allow this letter to serve as formal notification that we, as owner /permittee for the subject grading permit, have retained Rancho Coastal Engineering to act as the new Engineer of Work for the completion of the grading, any potential plan changes and the final as- builts. 1 have also hired Technical Field Services, Inc. (Chris Pinnow) as my new Soils Engineer. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me @ 760 - 586 -0001. Sincerely, �l� (�e f--- Stan Gafner A Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & Inspection (, June 9, 2010 A City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: NEW SOILS ENGINEER — THE GAFNER RESIDENCE, CITY OF ENCINITAS DRAWING NO. 10323 -G To Whom It May Concern: In accordance with Section 23.24 -360 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, please be advised that in reference to the above stated project, Technical Field Services, Inc., as new Soils Engineer, assumes responsibility for the geotechnical aspects of the project, in accordance with the Rules of the Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, California Code of Regulations, Title 16, Div. 5. Further, I have reviewed and accept the findings and recommendations made in the Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation by Christian Wheeler Engineering, dated April 16, 2008. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact this office at your convenience. Sincerely, q FE3 re Technical Fi Services Inc. UQNE'R r. .o. C 82282 Christopher innow, .E. cc o Exp :l(sgll Principal Engineer f`nm 1199 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434 -2617 Date: -12 1) 70 (o City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 - -__ n Re: Tract - 0-2) q L 7 i Drawing Number: / Z�7 Project Name: V �� Release of Responsibility — Owner's Statement In accordance with Section 23.24 -360 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, please be advised that in reference to the above stated plans, we are verifying a change of professional (Engineer, Soils Engineer, or Engineering Geologist) from (previous Engineer) to (new Engineer) Owner's Name / v Name Title g: Debra /release_ responsibility March 16, 2010 City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: NEW ENGINEER OF WORK — THE GAFNER RESIDENCE CITY OF ENCINITAS DRAWING NO. 10323 -G To Whom It May Concern: Please allow this letter to serve as formal notification that we, as owner /pennittee for the subject grading permit, have retained Rancho Coastal Engineering to act as the new Engineer of Work for the completion of the grading, any potential plan changes and the final as- builts. Rancho Coastal Engineering will be submitting a plan change in the very near future reflecting this change on the plans, along with a letter stating the same. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me @ 760 -586 -0001. Sincerely, Stan Gafner Technical Field Services, Inc. Civil Engineering & Inspection 1' June 9, 2010 A '% City of Encinitas Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE. NEW SOILS ENGINEER — THE GAFNER RESIDENCE, CITY OF ENCINITAS DRAWING NO. 10323 -G To Whom It May Concern: In accordance with Section 23.24 -360 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, please be advised that in reference to the above stated project, Technical Field Services, Inc., as new Soils Engineer, assumes responsibility for the geotechnical aspects of the project, in accordance with the Rules of the Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, California Code of Regulations, Title 16, Div. 5. Further, I have reviewed and accept the findings and recommendations made in the Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation by Christian Wheeler Engineering, dated April 16, 2008. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact this office at your convenience. Sincerely, ,oFF,;,, Technical Fi Services Inc. uQER— ,o o. C 62262 Christopher innow, .E. o Exp: =. Principal Engineer 1199 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 434 -2617 pt e4 December 15, 2009 Stanley D. Gafner and Mary H. Gafner 950 Saxony Road Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Permit issuance requirements for: Application 10323 -G Case # 09 -037 CDP /BA Site Address: 950 Saxony Road APN: 254- 362 -79 This letter summarizes the requirements for pulling your Engineering Permit for drawing 10323 -G. Your approved plan will remain valid for one year. If the permit is not issued within six months from the date of approval of the drawings, the plans will be subject to review by City staff for compliance with current codes and regulations before a permit can be issued, and changes to the approved plans as well as additional fees may be required. Please read through this letter carefully and contact the City with any questions you may have. It contains information about many requirements that may apply to your project and can make the process clearer and easier for you. In order to obtain the permits to construct the work shown on your approved plans, you will need to satisfy the requirements below. All of the items listed below must be submitted to the Engineering front counter in one complete package at the time the applicant comes in to pull the permit Partial submittals of any kind will not be accepted. Your project planchecker will not accept any of the documents listed on behalf of the Engineering front counter staff; all items must be submitted to the front counter directly together and at one time. The correct number of each of the requested documents must be provided; copies of documents submitted to the City during plancheck do not reduce the necessary quantities listed below. (1) Provide 4 print sets of the approved drawing 10323 -G Provide 2 copies of soils report entitled "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Single Family Residence, 950 Saxony Road, Encinitas, California" prepared by Christian Wheeler Engineering, dated Aprils 16, 2008. Submit 2 copies of the approved, signed (not draft) Resolution of Approval or Notice of Decision for Planning Case #09 -037 CDP /BA to be routed by the City to inspector and file (2) Post Security Deposits to guarantee all of the work shown on your approved drawings. The amounts of security deposits are determined directly from the Approved Engineer's Cost Estimate generated by your engineer according to a set of predetermined unit prices for each kind of work shown on your plans, titled "Engineer's Estimate" and dated November 11, 2009. You will be required to post security deposit(s) as follows: (a) Security Deposit for Grading Permit 10323 -G: in the amount $65.916.00 to guarantee both performance and labor /materials for earthwork, drainage, private improvements, and erosion control. (b) nla (c) nla (d) nla A minimum of 20% and up to 100% of the amount listed in item(s) 2(a) must be in the form of cash, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Up to 80% of the amount listed in item 2(a) may be in the form of auto - renewing Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Up to 100% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(b), 2(c), and /or 2(d) may be in the form of auto - renewing Labor and Materials bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Cash, certificates of deposit, letters of credit, and assignments of account are also acceptable financial instruments. If a certificate of deposit (CD) will be obtained to secure the entire amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a) and /or 2(b), two separate CD's for 25% and 75% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a) and /or 2(b) should be obtained in order to facilitate any future partial release of those securities. CD's posted may be of any term but must be auto- renewing and must specify the City of Encinitas as a certificate holder and include a clause that until the City of Encinitas provides a written request for release of the CD, the balance shall be available to the City upon its sole request. The format of any financial instrument is subject to City approval, may be in the owner's name only, and must list the City of Encinitas as a Certificate Holder. For any questions regarding how to post securities, bonding, or the required format of securities, please contact Debra Geishart at 760- 633 -2779. (3) Pay non - refundable fees as listed below: Fee Type Amount Grading Inspection $3,295.00 NPDES Inspection Gradin $659.00 Flood Control 637.00 Permanent Encroachment Permit n/a The grading and improvement inspection fees are calculated based on 5% of first $100,000.00 of the approved Engineer's cost estimate titled "Engineer's Estimate" and dated November 11, 2009 and 3% of the cost estimate over $100,000.00. The NPDES inspection fee is assessed as 1 % of the first $100,000.00 of the approved Engineer's cost estimate and 0.6% of the cost estimate over $100,000.00. The flood control fee is assessed at a rate of $0.21 per square foot of net new impervious surface area for driveway and parking areas as created per the approved plan (4) Provide the name, address, telephone number, state license number, and license type of the construction contractor. The construction of any improvements within the public right -of -way or public easements is restricted to qualified contractors possessing the required state license as listed in the table below. The contractor must also have on file with the City current evidence of one million dollar liability insurance listing the City of Encinitas as co- insured. Additional requirements are described in the handout "Requirements for Proof of Insurance' available at the Engineering front counter. r Type Description Work to be Done A General Engineering any & all C -8 Concrete a ron /curb/ utter /ram /sidewalk C -10 Electrical lighting/signals C -12 Grading & Paving any surface, certain drain - basins /channels C -27 Landscaping planting /irrigation /fencing & other amenities C -29 Masonry retaining walls C -32 Parking &Highway Improvement signage /striping /safety C -34 Pipeline sanitary sewer /storm drain (5) Permits are valid for no more than one year from the date of issuance and may expire earlier due to expirations of letter of credit and /or insurance policies. (0) This project does not propose land disturbance in excess of one acre and is exempt from the State Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) requirement. An erosion control plan shall be implemented per the approved grading plan. Preconstruction Meeting: A preconstruction meeting at the project site is mandatory for all projects. The preconstruction meeting may not be scheduled until the Engineering permit(s) have been issued, and the applicant/contractor must give the assigned Engineering inspector a minimum of 48 hours advance notice prior to the scheduled meeting time. Right -of -Way Construction Permit: A separate right -of -way construction permit will be required for any work in the public right -of -way or public easements. Typically, this work may include construction or reconstruction of a portion of the driveway within the public right -of -way, excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install electric, gas, telephone, and cable television lines, or water and sewer connections. A permit fee of $300.00 per application and a site plan, preferably the work order issued by the public utility, will be required. Contractor license and insurance requirements apply. Permits must be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the start of work. Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits: These separate permits may be required for your project and are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division. A fee of $250.00 is required for traffic control plans. For more details, contact Raymond Guarnes, Engineering Technician, at (760) 633 -2704. Release of Project Securities: proiect inspector. The processing and release of securities may take up to 4 weeks after the release process is initiated by the project Engineering inspector. Any cash releases will be mailed to the address on this letter unless the City is otherwise notified, and all letters mailed to a financial institution will be copied to the owner listed hereon. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection certified by the project Engineering inspector is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposit assigned to any Grading Permit. A sum in the amount of 25% of the securities posted for improvement permits will be held for a one -year warranty period, and a release is automatically initiated at the end of that warranty period. Construction Changes: Construction changes prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required for all changes to the approved plans. Requests for construction change approval should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department front counter as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to Feld implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposits. Construction change fees of $200.00 and $350.00 will be assessed for minor and major construction changes, respectively. Construction changes necessitating a new plan sheet will be assessed the per -sheet plancheck and NPDES plancheck fees in lieu of the construction change fee. Construction changes not previously approved and submitted as as -built drawings at the end of the construction process will be rejected and the securities release will be delayed. Change of Ownership: If a change of ownership occurs following approval of the drawing(s), the new owner will be required to submit to the City a construction change revising the title sheet of the plan to reflect the new ownership. The construction change shall be submitted to the Engineering front counter as redline mark -ups on two blueline prints of the approved drawing together with two copies of the grant deed or title report reflecting the new ownership. Construction change fees apply. The current owner will be required to post new securities to replace those held by the City under the name of the former owner, and the securities posted by the former owner will be released when the replacement securities have been received and approved by the City. Change of Engineer of Work: If a change in engineer of work occurs following the approval of the drawing(s), a construction change shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Department. Two copies of the forms for the assumption of responsibility by the new engineer and the release of responsibility by the former engineer shall be completed and submitted to the City. Construction change fees apply. As- bullts: Project as -built drawings prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required prior to Final Grading acceptance by Engineering Services. Changes to the approved plans require a construction This letter does not change owner or successor -in- interest obligations. If there should be a substantial delay in the start of your project or a change of ownership, please contact the City to request an update. Should you have questions regarding the posting of securities, please contact Debra Geishart, who processes all Engineering securities, at (760) 633 -2779. Should you have any other questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2780 or visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center to speak with an Engineering Technician. Sincerely, �j �c,� Ode l��, //( 4CA4 -2 " Ruben Macabitas Assistant Civil Engineer cc Sampo Engineering, Inc., Jesse Owens, Engineer of Work Debbie Geishart, Engineering Technician Masih Maher, Senior Civil Engineer permit/file Enc Application Requirements for Proof of Insurance Security Obligation Agreements (various)