The URL can be used to link to this page

2010-10433 G/I/PMAPPLICATION NO. ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION JOB SITE ADDRESS $0 Vies a LAKc PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION LARR` AKKe -Q NAME 17,1 SiMf l l� 111 V y MAlgo ct41 M, i CA W675; CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE TELEPHONE NO. -766 J I CIVIL ENGINEER INFORMATION 6oz Suwi) NAm"?, S r-A 'B R.GHT R00 A C6 C E ADDR64 n LS }3A Q p F 9000 CI�GE.ilP TELEPHOOU' �'Vr06 pt REGISTRATION NO. SIGNATURE OF ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 2 '56- lzl� I CONTRACTOR INFORMATION NAME ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE TELEPHONE NO. STATE LICENSE NO. & TYPE SOILS ENGINEER INFORMATION MARTIN OWE NAMEg730 IJdVE5 5r}'-�•7 (J�_ ADFAA! ler �� 16 ID CITY, STATE, ZIP TELEPHONEjj REGISTRATION NO. Wel DATE SIGNED G7-Jb4 PRINT NAME TELEPHONE NO. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW PLANNING CASE NUMBER 07 "164 '1QM160e FOR GRADING PLANS: J OK FOR PLAN CHECK Ate, &,"" J PLANNER I:kioskhandouWEng /Eng. Dev. App FOR FINAL MAPS /PARCEL MAPS FINAL MAP PARCEL MAP V5! la DATE TIC(; March 28, 2011 Harold L. Baker, Andrew Cady and Nitza Leichtling 125 Seeman Drive Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Permit issuance requirements for: Application 10433 -G and I Case no. 07 -164 TPM /CDP 680 Westlake Street 258 - 121 -11 This letter summarizes the requirements for pulling your Engineering Permit for drawing 10433 -G and I. Your approved plan will remain valid for six months. If the permit is not issued within six months from the date of approval of the drawings, the plans will be subject to review by City staff for compliance with current codes and regulations before a permit can be issued, and changes to the approved plans as well as additional fees may be required. Additionally, work covered by an Engineering permit shall commence within 90 days of the permit issuance or the permit shall become invalid. Engineering permits expire following 90 days of inactivity on the work covered by the permit. Please read through this letter carefully and contact the City with any questions you may have. It contains information about many requirements that may apply to your project and can make the process clearer and easier for you. In order to obtain the permits to construct the work shown on your approved plans, you will need to satisfy the requirements below. All of the items listed below must be submitted to the Engineering front counter in one complete package at the time the applicant comes in to pull the permit. Partial submittals of any kind will not be accepted. Your project planchecker will not accept any of the documents listed on behalf of the Engineering front counter staff; all items must be submitted to the front counter directly together and at one time. The correct number of each of the requested documents must be provided; copies of documents submitted to the City during plancheck do not reduce the necessary quantities listed below. (1) Provide 4 print sets of the approved drawing 10433 -G and I Provide 2 copies of soils report "Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Four Parcel Residential Subdivision, 680 Westlake Street, Encinitas, California" prepared by Martin R. Owen, Geotechnical Engineer and dated November 12, 2009 (Project No. 091027). Submit 2 copies of the approved, signed (not draft) Resolution of Approval or Notice of Decision for Planning Case # 07 -164 TPM /CDP to be routed by the City to inspector and file. Pay additional plancheck fees in the amount indicated in the fee table below Pay NPDES plancheck fees in the amount indicated in the fee table below. (2) Post Security Deposits to guarantee all of the work shown on your approved drawings. The amounts of security deposits are determined directly from the Approved Engineer's Cost Estimate generated by your engineer according to a set of predetermined unit prices for each kind of work shown on your plans. You will be required to post security deposit(s) as follows: (a) Security Deposit for Grading Permit 10433 -G: in the amount $109.288.00 to guarantee both performance and labor/ materials for earthwork, drainage, private improvements, and erosion control. (b) Security Deposit for Improvement Permit 10433 -I: in the amount $52.520.00 to guarantee the performance and labor/ materials for the improvements shown on the approved improvement plan. (c) Security Deposit for Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities: N/A (d) Security Deposit for Deferred Monumentation: in the amount of $2,063.00 to guarantee the setting of the monuments for your project. The amount of the security deposit is based directly upon the Monumentation Cost Estimate provided by your project engineer. A minimum of 20% and up to 100% of the amount listed in item(s) 2(a) must be in the form of cash, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Up to 80% of the amount listed in item 2(a) may be in the form of auto - renewing Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Up to 100% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(b), 2(c), and /or 2(d) may be in the form of auto - renewing Labor and Materials bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Cash, certificates of deposit, letters of credit, and assignments of account are also acceptable financial instruments. If a certificate of deposit (CD) will be obtained to secure the entire amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a) and /or 2(b), two separate CD's for 25% and 75% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a) and /or 2(b) should be obtained in order to facilitate any future partial release of those securities. CD's posted may be of any term but must be auto - renewing and must specify the City of Encinitas as a certificate holder and include a clause that until the City of Encinitas provides a written request for release of the CD, the balance shall be available to the City upon its sole request. The format of any financial instrument is subject to City approval, may be in the owner's name only, and must list the City of Encinitas as a Certificate Holder. For any questions regarding how to post securities, bonding, or the required format of securities, please contact Debra Geishart at 760 - 633 -2779. (3) Pay non - refundable fees as listed below: Fee Type Amount Grading Inspection $5,278.00 Improvement Inspection $2,626.00 NPDES Inspection (Grading) $1,055.00 NPDES Inspection (Improvement) 525.00 Flood Control $1,031.00 Additional Plancheck Fees Due N/A NPDES Plancheck Fees Due N/A GIS Mapping Fee (Maps/ PM's only) 375.00 The grading and improvement inspection fees are calculated based on 5% of first $100,000.00 of the approved Engineer's cost estimate dated March 28, 2011 and 3% of the cost estimate over $100,000.00. The NPDES inspection fee is assessed as 1% of the first $100,000.00 of the approved Engineer's cost estimate and 0.6% of the cost estimate over $100,000.00. The flood control fee is assessed at a rate of $0.21 per square foot of net new impervious surface area for driveway and parking areas as created per the approved plan. (4) Provide the name, address, telephone number, state license number, and license type of the construction contractor. The construction of any improvements within the public riaht -of -way or public easements is restricted to qualified contractors possessing the required state license as listed in the table below. The contractor must also have on file with the City current evidence of one million dollar liability insurance listing the City of Encinitas as co- insured. Additional requirements are described in the handout "Requirements for Proof of Insurance" available at the Engineering front counter. Type Description Work to be Done A General Engineering any & all C -8 Concrete a ron /curb/ utter /ram /sidewalk C -10 Electrical li htin /signals C -12 Grading & Paving any surface, certain drain - basins /channels C -27 Landscaping planting /irrigationlfencing & other amenities C -29 Masonry reta n ng walls C -32 Parking &Highway Improvement signage /striping /safety C -34 Pipeline sanitary sewer /storm drain (5) Permits are valid for no more than one year from the date of issuance and may expire earlier due to expirations of letter of credit and /or insurance policies. (6) This project does not propose land disturbance in excess of one acre and is exempt from the State Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) requirement. An erosion control plan shall be implemented per the approved grading plan. Preconstruction Meeting: A preconstruction meeting at the project site is mandatory for all projects. The preconstruction meeting may not be scheduled until the Engineering permit(s) have been issued, and the applicant/contractor must give the assigned Engineering inspector a minimum of 48 hours advance notice prior to the scheduled meeting time. Right -of -Way Construction Permit: A separate right -of -way construction permit will be required for any work in the public right -of -way or public easements. Typically, this work may include construction or reconstruction of a portion of the driveway within the public right -of -way, excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install electric, gas, telephone, and cable television lines, or water and sewer connections. A permit fee of $300.00 per application and a site plan, preferably the work order issued by the public utility, will be required. Contractor license and insurance requirements apply. Permits must be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the start of work. Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits: These separate permits may be required for your project and are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division. A fee of $250.00 is required for traffic control plans. For more details, contact Raymond Guarnes, Engineering Technician, at (760) 633 -2704. Release of Project Securities: The partial or complete release of project securities is initiated project inspector. The processing and release of securities may take up to 4 weeks after the release process is initiated by the project Engineering inspector. Any cash releases will be mailed to the address on this letter unless the City is otherwise notified, and all letters mailed to a financial institution will be copied to the owner listed hereon. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection certified by the project Engineering inspector is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposit assigned to any Grading Permit. A sum in the amount of 25% of the securities posted for improvement permits will be held for a one -year warranty period, and a release is automatically initiated at the end of that warranty period. Construction Changes: Construction changes prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required for all changes to the approved plans. Requests for construction change approval should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department front counter as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposits. Construction change fees of $200.00 and $350.00 will be assessed for minor and major construction changes, respectively. Construction changes necessitating a new plan sheet will be assessed the per -sheet plancheck and NPDES plancheck fees in lieu of the construction change fee. Construction changes not previously approved and submitted as as -built drawings at the end of the construction process will be rejected and the securities release will be delayed. Change of Ownership: If a change of ownership occurs following approval of the drawing(s), the new owner will be required to submit to the City a construction change revising the title sheet of the plan to reflect the new ownership. The construction change shall be submitted to the Engineering front counter as redline mark -ups on two blueline prints of the approved drawing together with two copies of the grant deed or title report reflecting the new ownership. Construction change fees apply. The current owner will be required to post new securities to replace those held by the City under the name of the former owner, and the securities posted by the former owner will be released when the replacement securities have been received and approved by the City. Change of Engineer of Work: If a change in engineer of work occurs following the approval of the drawing(s), a construction change shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Department. Two copies of the forms for the assumption of responsibility by the new engineer and the release of responsibility by the former engineer shall be completed and submitted to the City. Construction change fees apply. As- builts: Project as -built drawings prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required prior to Final Grading acceptance by Engineering Services. Changes to the approved plans require a construction change to be submitted to the City prior to field implementation. Construction changes may not be submitted as as- builts at the end of the construction process. This letter does not change owner or successor -in- interest obligations. If there should be a substantial delay in the start of your project or a change of ownership, please contact the City to request an update. Should you have questions regarding the posting of securities, please contact Debra Geishart, who processes all Engineering securities, at (760) 633 -2779. Should you have any other questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2780 or visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center to speak with an Engineering Technician. Sincerely, Ruben Macabitas Assistant Civil Engineer cc The Seabright Company (Robert Sukup) Debbie Geishart, Engineering Technician Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Masih Maher, Senior Civil Engineer permit/file Enc Application Requirements for Proof of Insurance Security Obligation Information o Sea Bright March 24, 2010 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Att: Engineering Department COST ESTIMATE — BAKER 4 LOT SUBDIVISION MONUMENTATION 680 WESTLAKE STREET 10433 - O 07 -164 TPM/CDP, APN 258 - 121 - 11 Set Survey Monuments 15 EA. Q $125 = 1,875 Sub Total 10% Contingency Total No. CD288oP EV• bakrnmmest $1,875 188 $2,063 Engineering Management General Contracting Development 4322 Sea Bright Place Carlsbad, CA 92008 Telephons/FAX 760. 720 -0098 Z001A dW0D*IHDR9*VHS 96000ZLOU XVa 99:80 TTOZi6Z /C0 the Sea C 0 M November 4.2010 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Att: Engineering Department BriSht NOY 5 10q COST ESTIMATE — BAKER 4 LOT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT PLAN 680 WESTLAKE STREET 10433-1 07 -164 TPM/CDP, APN 258 - 121 - 11 6" Curb and Gutter 375 L.F. @ $20.00 = $7,500 Concrete Driveway 2 EA. @ 950 = 1,900 Sidewalk 1,635 S.F. @ 5.00 = 8,175 Saw Cut 375 L.F. @ 4.00 = 1,500 A.C. Pavement [4/6] 1,312 S.F. @ 2.30 = 3,018 6" A.C. Dike 113 L.F. @ 8.20 = 927 D -27 Outlet Pipes 5 EA. @ 500 = 2,500 Curb Return Ramp I EA. @ 2,200 = 2,200 Trench Repair 488 S.F. @ 4.00 = 1,952 Remove Stripes 309 L.F. @ 3.00 = 927 New Striping 587 L.F. @ .65 = 382 4" Sewer Lateral 3 EA. @ 1,335 = 4,005 1" Water Service & 1" Meter 3 EA. @ 2,478 = 7,434 Street Sign I EA. @ 250 = 250 Relocate Fire Hydrant 1 EA. @ 1,500 = 1,500 Sub Total $44,170 �h 10% Contingency ��Pt 0. SV1�q 4,417 CO w t! Total ------- ------------ --- ---------- - - - - -- * Nu -eeea_ ---- t'- ---- - - - - - -- $48,587 EXp 31 I Z CIV1L Bakrstest Engineering ° Management General Contracting• Development 4322 Sea Bright Place • Carlsbad, CA 92008 < Telephone /FAX 760 - 720 -0098 OChicago Title Company Builders Services Division 2365 Northside Drive, Suite 500, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521 -3400 Title Department: Chicago Title Company Attn: Tom Votel/Ken Cyr Email: voteltna ctt.com & ken.cyrQctt.com Phone: (619) 521 -3553 & (619) 521 -3555 Fax: (619) 521 -3608 Order No.: 930016149 -U50 Customer: Harold Baker Attn: Harold Baker Email: hlbaker3 -,cox.net Phone: (760) 436 -7946 Reference-No.: 680 Westlake SECOND AMENDED PRELIMINARY REPORT Property Address: 680 Westlake Street Encinitas, CA NOV 8 2010 Dated as of: October 18, 2010 at 7:30 am In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Chicago Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusion from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that se forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Chicago Title Insurance Company Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefaUy considered B is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (I 1 -17-06) Page I Order No.: 930016149 -U50 SCHEDULE A The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: A Fee 2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: Harold L. Baker, Jr., Trustee of The Harold L. Baker, Jr. Trust dated September 13, 2004, an undivided 75% Interest and Andrew P, Cady and Nitza K. Leichtling as Trustees of the Leichtling Catty Family Trust Initially created February 4, 2010, an undivided 25% interest, as tenants in common. 3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of San Diego and is described in the Legal Description, attached hereto: END OF SCHEDULE A CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11 -17 -06) Page 2 Order No.: 930016149 -U50 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 10 OF RANCHO REQUIZA, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 2133, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON OCTOBER 11. 1928. APN: 258 -121 -11 END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION CI: FA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11 -17 -06) Page 3 Order No.: 930016149 -U50 SCHEDULE B At the date hereof, items to be considered and exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: Property taxes, including any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2010 -2011 I' Installment: $2,812.79 Penalty: $281.27 (Due after December 10) 2nd Installment: $2,812.79 Penalty and Cost: $291.27 (Due after April 10) Code Area: 19077 Assessors Parcel Number: 258 -121 -11 2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) of the revenue and taxation code of the State of California 3. Intentionally omitted. 4. Intentionally omitted. 5. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in possession thereof. This office must be notified at least 7 business days prior to the scheduled closing in order to arrange for an inspection of the land; upon completion of this inspection you will be notified of the removal of specific coverage exceptions and/or additional exceptions to coverage. 6. Any rights of parties in possession of said land, based on any unrecorded lease, or leases. This Company will require a full copy of any unrecorded lease, together with all supplements, assignments, and amendments for review. END OF SCHEDULE B CLTA Preliminary Repon Fo m -Modified (11- 17-06) Page 4 Order No.: 930016149 -U50 INFORMATIONAL NOTES Note No. 1: The policy of title insurance will include an arbitration provision. The Company or the insured may demand arbitration. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or other obligation. Please ask your escrow or title officer for a sample copy of the policy to be issued if you wish to review the arbitration provisions and any other provisions pertaining to your Title Insurance coverage. Note No. 2: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than the amount, if any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Note No. 3: If title is to be insured in the Trustee(s) of a Trust, (or if their act is to be insured), this Company will require a copy of the Trust Agreement including all exhibits listing real and personal property transferred into the Trust together with complete copies of any amendments or modifications thereto. The Company must also be furnished with a verification of all present Trustees stating that the copy being furnished is a true and correct copy of the entire Trust Agreement including all modifications or amendments; that the Trust is currently in full force and effect; and that it has not been revoked or terminated. W-& ATTACHMENT ONE PRIVACY STATEMENT IMPORTANT INFORMATION: For those of you receiving this report by electronic delivery the Privacy Statement and Exclusions submitted for your review. C LTA Preliminary Report Fofm - Modified (11 -17-06) Page 5 N NO I m_ (continued) /D] T� L n F s y y � A A • F F] Description: San Diego, CA Assessor Map 258.12 Selected Pages 1 Page 1 Order. MLMOOO Comment: Attachment One (11 -17406) Page 13 m IN 0� Zg N 'n YYYYYY b 2 M (35 n �I Y a 9 �15 35� © IADf�A��OOAf�E�DAA9999OADAAAAAAOA 0 H11 333 HHH; /D] T� L n F s y y � A A • F F] Description: San Diego, CA Assessor Map 258.12 Selected Pages 1 Page 1 Order. MLMOOO Comment: Attachment One (11 -17406) Page 13 m IN 0� Zg N 'n YYYYYY b 2 M (35 n �I Y a 9 �15 35� 2010-06- 0812:08 LARRYBAKER 7614362905» 8586216050 Pill RECORDING REOUESTED BY DOC. 2010- 0089778 AND T RECORDED NTS TO: DEED 11111111 IIII IIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIII IINI1111111N11111111111111111 AND TAX STATEMENTS TO: Harold L Baker, Jr. FEB 23, 2010 3:15 PM OFFICIAL RECORDS En vitas, Seratas C 920 ' I SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE Encinitas, CA 92024 DAb9D L. BUTLER, COUNT Y RECORDER FEE5 Soo 0C OC PAGES: 11000MENTARYTRANSFER TAX S o Nr. �u•rrJCnrti[.T% ..x-co poled on die o ilffeion or Value of r� Y owwyo t OR ....Computed on the covidvasm a value 1M% Iwts a ercumbmces rcnvini„g a lime of salt GRANT DEED FOR A VALUAFILE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. 11111111IIII101114111111I0411111ill Harold L Baker, Jr., Trustee of The Harold L Baker, Jr. Trust, dated September 13, 2004 hereby GRANT(S) to Harold L Baker, Jr., Trustee of The Harold L Baler, Jr. Trust dated September 13. 2004, an undivided 75% interest and Aodrew P. Cady and Nitre K I.eiehtling as Trustees of the tAichtling Cady Family Trust initially created February 4, 2010, an atadlvided 25% interest, as tenants In common. the real prop" in the County of San Diego, State of California, described as: APN 253121 -11-00 Lot 10 of Rancho Requizat, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Map thereof No. 2133, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on October 11, 1928. Dated Z I 1 /I0 STATC OF CALIFORNIA )ss COUNIY Of On �r(X 0* , q �, Ol o�e before mc. ef �ry public, orsorWiy pruVcd m me on the basis of wiliffoory evidence to be the person(s) whose mau(s) is/arc subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me the hc/shc/they executed the same in his/herhheir author zed capecity(ics), and that by his/herlthcir sigrsahsrc(s) on the tu"mert the peram(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the penun(s) sctal, executed the instrument. 1 certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the Stale of California that Live furcgoing Paragraph is true and corrcct. WITNESS my and official seal. //>e-2/ 000�, Signature L Raker. Jr., Tnmm Ea:g c aroat aata$'ba A. ELLITOR cdnau NO ,tQwt7 Le "Mary Pubfic - catMarota San Olaya county comas. Er keg Jan q 2D13 20W06- 0812:08 LARRY BAKER 7604362905» 8586216050 9ECORDWG REQUESTED BY WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DEED AND TAX STA I EMENTS TO: P III DC # 2010 - 0089778 IIINII IIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII VIII IIII nil Harold L Baker, Jr. FEB 23, 2010 3:15 PM 124 Seewa Drive SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE Encinilaa C CA 92021 `� DAS50 L. BUTLER. COUNTY RECORDER FEES: 900 OC OC PAGES: DOCI)MENTARYTRANSITRTAXS 0 Nt. �r u'�r�CnniGrp+ ..X-..CanpuYd m 01c comidnrim or valor of popaty wmcyc4 OR ... l:ornDubd on nr carsi,kxtlim,x slue kss litrts ar encumtranoes rrnuinir,� tl I,rtc,d'vlt GRANT DEED FOR A VALUARLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. Harold L Baker, Jr., Trustee of The Harold L Baker, Jr. Trust, dated Septeaber 13, 2004 hereby GRANT(S) to Harold L Baker, Jr., Truster of The Harold L Baker, Jr. Trust dated September 13, 2004, in undivided 75% interest and Aadrew P. Cady and Nitre K Leichtling as Trustees of the Leichtling Cady Family Trust initially created February 1, 2010, an amdivided 25% interest, as Imanb In common. the mid property in the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, described as: APN 25121 -11-00 Lot 10 of Rancho Requires, in the City of Cncinitaa, County of San Diego, State of Callfornis, according to the Map thereof No. 2133, filed is the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on October 11, 1928. Dated Z l0 STATE OF CAI.IFORNIA C )UNry OF EM Y ,r on _ V before tIK, ra v publ c ly pivvcd to me on the basis of satilifLiory evidence to be the person(s) whoa muse(s) is/arc subscribed to the within instrument end acknowledged to me that hc/shrJthey executed the some in his/her /their authorized capacity(ics), and that by his/her/their sigmmugs) on the instrument the person(:) or the entity upon behalf of which the posom(s) actod, cxmutcd the insmanon. I certify undo PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my and official seal. Signature G G0111fEElA A. ElUf011 CtaraNaataa . 1ane7 kototy Public - CdNUMk San Off" Gawtly Ca'" E kas Jon )Q 2013 WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DEED AND TAX STATEMENTS TO: Harold L. Baker, Jr. 124 Seeman Drive Encinitas, CA 92024 DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX S-0 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE ..X ... Computed on the consideration or value of property conveyed; OR .....Computed on the consideration or value less liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale. GRANT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Harold L. Baker, Jr., Trustee of The Harold L. Baker, Jr. Trust, dated September 13, 2004 hereby GRANT(S) to Harold L. Baker, Jr., Trustee of The Harold L. Baker, Jr. Trust dated September 13, 2004, an undivided 75% interest and Andrew P. Cady and Nitza K. Leichtling as Trustees of the Leichtling Cady Family Trust initially created February 4, 2010, an undivided 25% interest, as tenants in common. the real property in the County of San Diego, State of California, described as: APN 258- 121 -I1 -00 Lot 10 of Rancho Requiza, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Map thereof No. 2133, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on October 11, 1928. Harold L. Baker, Jr.. Trustee STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF before me, notary public, personally )Ss proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) islare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her / thcir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature L eNDMARK C O N S U L T N O Date: 11 -30 -2012 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas. CA 92024 NOV 3 0 2012 ENGINEER& SERVICES CITY OF ENCINI ?AS Re: Engineer's Final Grading Certification for Project No. 10433 -G, Grading Permit Number 10433 -G. The grading under permit number 10433 -G has been performed in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan or as shown on the attached 'As Graded' plan. Final grading inspection has demonstrated that lot drainage conforms to the approved grading plan and that swales drain at a minimum of 1 % to the street and /or an appropriate drainage system. All the Low Impact Development, Source Control and Treatment Control Best Management Practices as shown on the drawing and required by the Best management Practice Manual Part II were constructed and are operational, together with the required maintenance covenant(s). Engineer of Record (signed & sealed) 1117-If Dated POFESS /p P Ny� H. a w No. 62717 m Cc Exp. 6- 30 -20Z sT CNt1- �`P OF CAl -CFO j Verification by the Engineering Inspector of this fact is done by the Inspector's signature hereon and will take place only after the above is signed and stamped and will not relieve the Engineer of Record of thp_ualtin+ate resp ibi�liity�: Engineering Inspector: 1 6 L Dated: _ �� ?� / The above information shall be on the Engineer of Record's letterhead and shall be signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record J t LW AM CONSULTING July 17, 2012 CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Department 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE. City of Encinitas, TPM 07 -164, PM No. 20897 To whom it may concern: This is to certify that the referenced subdivision has been monumented in accordance with Parcel Map No. 20897 and that Landmark Consulting has been paid for these services. Very truly yours, LANDMARK CONSULTING Mark A. Brencick, P.E., P.L.S. LS 7226, Expires: 12 -31 -12 W.O. No. 0174 -1 <u� wart 1 �IL (.f BnEMC1CK D J (J11k exp. 1241.2012 Q \�OFCAo- '0 • 9555 Genesee Avenue, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121. Ph. (858) 587 -8070 Fax (858) 587 -8750 TO: City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Street Encinitas, Ca 92024 ATTN: Engineering L NDMARK Letter of Transmittal DATE July 17, 2012 PROJECT: Westlake PROJECT NO: 10433 -I JN: 174 -1 We are forwarding: [ ] By Messenger By Mail [ ] For your Pick -up ( ] By Overnight No. Conies: Description: Comments: This material is forwarded for: I ] Your files [ ] Per Your Request [ ] Checking [ ] Your Review ( ] Other By: David Yeh Cc: File [ X )Approval 9555 Genesee Avenue, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92121 Phone: (858) 587 -8070 LMC01 CITY OF ENCINITAS INSPECTION REPORT Storm Water Quality Inspection for Construction Activities 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, CA 92024 • 760- 633 -2770 • FAX 760- 633 -2818 • TDD 760 -633 -2700 Property Address: (050 We:5 1 LA XE Sr Inspection Date: 1 Contact Person: ID IL-L S oI(al /L37- Permit No: 1 OY 33 6 Phone Number: (91 w 2-L10— 2L�35 Project Size: Z LIe-,,,es +1 Site Status: ❑ Active ❑ Inactive ❑ First Inspection CrTinal Sign -Off Date 21LdfL Inspection Frequency: ❑ Bi- Weekly ❑ Monthly ❑ Bi- Annual ❑ Post Rain Event ❑ Complaint Assessment State Construction General Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No WDID # Is Project SWPPP on Site? ❑ Yes ❑ No Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) Name: Fiber Rolls Phone Number: INSTALLATION MINIMUM BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (BMP) BMP • OTHER CORRECTIVE REQUIREMENTS • • MAINTENANCE ACTIONS A. Erosion Control BMPs 1 Slope I Soil Stabilization 2 Silt Fencing 3 Check Dams 1 Rip Rap 4 Fiber Rolls 5 Permanent Landscaping 6 Preserving Existing Vegetation 7 Diversion Channel for Run -On 8 Other: ' Control BMPs 1 Storm Drain Inlet Protection 2 Detention Basin / Desilting Basin 3 Perimeter Protection 4 Stabilized Construction Entrance I Exit 5 Other, C.. Mana ement BMft -° 1 Stockpile Management 2 Material Washout Area 3 Equipment Storage 4 Trash, Litter, Debris Management 5 Designated Washout Area (s) 6 Sanitary Waste Area Management 7 Fuel I Chemical Storage 8 Other: Corrective Actions: O Correct Work (See Comments) o Corrective Actions Required O Referred to the Clean Water Program O Stop Work/NOV Comments: _'5_/7L CUlnDLEZE2� 10.2 -L I ;tFJ41(AVQ2 OZ Mill- Cl/ED- - vsr r„j_s-,Ytf 1( r7o1J 671Ps ld i6�/NC7 0A)j,416 Corrective Actions identified above must be addressed, to the satisfaction of the City Inspector, within days from the date above OR prior to the next predicted rain even a to ply by this dilate may result in further enforcement action by the City of Encinitas. Inspector (Signature) Date /?11111 Z Received By (Signature) Date _ /_ /_ COPY DISTRIBUTION White - Responsible Party Yellow - City Inspector Pink - File REVISED 1011111 CITY OF ENCINITAS CLEAN WATER PROGRAM 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, CA 92024 • 760.633 -2770 • FAX 760633 -2818 • TDD 760-633 -2700 CONSTRUCTION SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE CONTROL All construction projects in the City of Encinitas are required to implement minimum Best Management Practices (BMPs) as necessary to comply with the current State General Municipal Stormwater Permit, State Construction General Permit (Order No. 2009 - 0009 -DWQ), the City's Watercourse Protection, Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (EMC 20.08), and the Grading Ordinance (EMC 23.24). Construction is a dynamic operation where changes are expected. Stormwater BMPs for construction sites are usually temporary measures that require frequent maintenance to maintain effectiveness and may require relocation, revision, and re- installation, particularly as project grading progresses. If minimum BMPs are infeasible or deemed inadequate at any specific site, the City will require the implementation of equivalent or alternative BMPs in order to minimize and /or eliminate non- stormwater discharge. DEFINITIONS Best Management Practices or "BMPs" means schedules of activities, pollution treatment practices or devices, prohibitions of practices, general good housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, operation and maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants directly or indirectly to Storm Water, Receiving Waters, or the Storm Water Conveyance System. Illegal Discharge is any discharge to the Storm Water Conveyance System that is not composed entirely of Storm Water. Inactive Construction Site means that construction activities have ceased for a period of 7 or more consecutive calendar days. At any time of the year, an inactive site must be fully protected from erosions and discharges of sediment. State General Construction Storm Water Permit means State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Order No. 2009-0009 - DWQ, Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activities, and any amendments thereto. Storm Water Conveyance System means private and public drainage facilities within the City of Encinitas by which Storm Water may be conveyed to waters of the United States, including but not limited to, streets, roads, catch basins, natural and artificial channels, natural and artificial drainage features, aqueducts, canyons, stream beds, gullies, curbs, gutters, ditches, and storm drains. Wet Season means October 1 thru April 30 of each year. EMC 20.08.040 • ILLEGAL DISCHARGES A. Discharge of Storm Water. No person shall discharge Storm Water directly or indirectly into the Storm Water Conveyance System or Receiving Waters, unless discharged in compliance with this Chapter. B. Discharge of Non -storm water Prohibited. No person shall discharge non -storm water directly or indirectly into the Storm Water Conveyance System or Receiving Waters. EMC 20.08.050 • NOTIFICATION AND MITIGATION OF ILLEGAL DISCHARGES A Discharger shall immediately notify the City Engineer of an Illegal Discharge and take immediate action to control and contain the Illegal Discharge. The Discharger shall also mitigate any damage caused by the Illegal Discharge. EMC 20.08.070 • LITTERING & SWEEPING No person shall throw, deposit, leave, maintain, keep or permit to be thrown, deposited, placed, left or maintained, any refuse, pet waste, rubbish, garbage, or other discarded or abandoned objects, in or upon any street, alley, parking lot, sidewalk, curb, gutter, storm drain, catch basin, conduit, or other drainage structure or lot except in receptacles maintained for the regular disposal of garbage. Impervious surfaces which drain directly or indirectly into the Storm Water Conveyance System shall be kept free of dirt and debris by regular sweeping. The sweepings shall be placed in garbage receptacles and shall not be allowed to enter the Storm Water Conveyance System. EMC 20.08.080 • COMPLIANCE WITH BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES No Discharger shall fail to implement, install, use, or maintain Best Management Practices established by the City Engineer pursuant to this Chapter. COPY DISTRIBUTION While - Responsible Parry Yellow - City Inspector Pink - Fne R_VISED 1 0 * * ' erz-1W A ®NDMARK C O N S U L T I N G Planning Engineering Surveying April 16, 2012 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Engineer's Pad Certification For Project No.: Parcels 1, 3 & 4 of PM 20897 and Grading Permit No.: 10433 -G Pursuant to Section 23.24.310 of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad certification Letter for Parcels 1, 3 & 4 of PM 20897. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading for these lots has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and the requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. 23.24.3 10 (B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Parcel No.: Pad elevation per Plan: 211.0 199.5 199.2 Pad Elevation per Field Measurement: 210.9 199.5 199.2 23.24.310(B)1. Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices and/or retaining walls have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.310(B)5. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.3 1 O(B)6. The construction of earthen berms and positive building and pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Thanks. Sincerely, LANDMARK CONSULTING Mark A. Brencick, PE, PLS President C481.53 S EItP 6410.2012 /* e 9555 Genesee Avenue, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121, Ph: (858) 587.8070 • Martin R. Owen PE, GE 4962 Cresita Drive, San Diego, CA 92115 Tel: 619-813-8462, Fax: 619-S42-9046 Email: martinowen @geotechengineer.com Job No. 091027 May 23, 2012 To: Mr. Jaime Valenzuela Pacific Coast Development Group, Inc Subject: Change of Geotechnical Engineer Proposed Four - Parcel Residential Subdivision 680 Westlake Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Dear Mr. Valenzuela: Inland Technologies has taken over as Geotechnical Engineer on this project and I am releasing all rights to the project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to tail or contact me. Very truly yours, Martin R. Owen PE, GE Geotechnical Engineer Pacificcoast DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. 06/05/2012 Todd Baum City of Encinitas Dear Mr. Baum, Per your instructions, attach are the two letters you requested from our previous soils engineer, Martin R Owen, PE, GE releasing all rights to this project to the new soils engineer, James Worley of [eland Engineering Technologies Inc. who is accepting all duties for Engineer of Record. Landmark Consulting will be picking up the plans to change the soils engineer on record. ' Brennan Coast Development 27450 YNEZ RD. SUrIT 228, TrMF.CUTA, CA 92591 951695.9555, FAX: 951 -695 -9557 nland Engineering °�° ■ echnoloe� ' 41655 Reagan Way Ste. E Murrieta. CA. 92562 (951)894 -6494 gi 7 n: ■ Fa Fax: (951) 894 -6491 November 7, 2011 Mr. James Brennan Pacfe Coast Development Group 2750 Ynez Road #228 Temecula, CA 92590 Project No. 11 -2311 Subject: Notification of Change of Consultant of Record for the Proposed Single Family Residences located at 680 Westlake Street, City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, California. Reference: Martin Owen, Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed four parcel residential subdivision, 680 Westlake Street, Encinitas, California, 92024. Job No. 091027 Dated November 12, 2009 In accordance with your request, Inland Engineering Technologies, Inc. (IET) has reviewed the above referenced report and the City of Encinitas documents for the proposed single family residences at the subject site. We are in agreement with the findings, conclusions and recommendations presented in the above referenced report and documents. IET will assume the duties of Engineer of Record from this point forward. The opportunity of submitting this letter is sincerely appreciated. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, INLAND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. P. FJCP 3 V 'rr �rFCHNNPi es Worley Yogi Pirathapan, U, c ""Fc President Associate Engineer AS-GRADED SITE WORK REPORT FOR THE OBSERVA77ONAND TES77NGFOR THESTREET IMPROVEMENT WORK LOCATED AT 680 WESTLAKE STREET, CITY OFENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA. Project No.: 11 -2311 Dated. May 3, 2012 Prepared jar: Mr. James Brennan Pacific Coast Development 2750 Ynez Road #228 Temecula, CA 92590 41655 Reagan Way Ste.E Murrieta, CA. 92562 Ph: (951) 894 -6464 Inland Engineering Technologies Inc. Fax: (951) 894 -6491 May 3, 2012 Mr. James Brennan Pacific Coast Development 2750 Ynez Road #228 Temecula, CA 92590 Project No. 11 -2311 Subject: As- Graded Reportfor the Observation and Testingfor the Street Improvement Work Located at 680 Westlake Street, City of Encinitas, County of San Diego California. In accordance with your request, Inland Engineering Technologies Inc. (IET) has provided geotechnical services during the grading operations for the street improvement work located at 680 Westlake Street, City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, California. The accompanying as- graded report summarizes our observations, field and laboratory test results, and the geotechnical conditions encountered during the grading operations at the subject site. Grading operations for the street improvement were performed in general accordance with geotechnical recommendations made during the course of grading and the City of Encinitas grading requirements. If you have any questions regarding our report, please contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, INLAND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 28 9 `� °C n EXP. 't a l,�rFCTECHH��'P�e� -OF CA_t Qley Yogi Pirathapan GE 283 Associate Engineer YP/KH TABLE OF CONTENTS Section rm 1.0 I N M O D U C T IO N . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Z,0 SUAMURYOF FIELD OPERATIONS OPERATIONS .............................................. ..............................1 2.1 Site Preparation ................................................................................................. ............................... 1 2.2 Fill Pl acement .................................................................................................... ............................... 1 2.3 Laboratory Testing ............................................................................................ ............................... 2 2.4 Field Density Testing ........................................................................................ ............................... 2 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................... ..............................2 4.0 LIMITATIONS .. ....................... ».... ».. . ». »...... ».... ».... »..... ».... ».. .. ». »...» 1 LIST OF TABLES AND APPENDICES -,I M- Table e 1 — Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content Annendka Appendix A — Summary of Field Density Test Results (Rear of Text) 1.0 INTRODUCTION In accordance with your request, IET has performed geotechnical observation and testing services during the site work grading for the street improvement located at 680 Westlake Street, City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, California. The grading operations involved backfill of utility trenches reestablishment of subgrade and installation of base material The earthwork operations during removal and recompaction were observed and tested under the supervision from a representative of IET. This as- graded report summarizes our geotechnical observations, field and laboratory test results and the geotechnical conditions encountered during the grading operations on the site. In addition, this report provides conclusions and recommendations for the site work. The grading was performed by Pacific Coast Development Group. IET was not responsible for line and grade. 20 SUMMARY OF AS- GRADED CONDITION AND FIELD OPERATIONS Grading work started and finished in February 2012 .Grading operations included: 1) removal of soils for trench excavation and replacing the soils as compacted fill. 2) placement of compacted fill and base material to design grade. 2.l Site Preparation Prior to grading, undocumented fill, topsoil, and alluvium were removed down to competent material, which generally consists of competent silty sand. The maximum depth of remedial removals on the site, below the existing surface, was approximately 2 feet below the existing grade. Areas to receive fill were scarified a minimum of 6 inches, moisture- conditioned as needed to obtain a near -optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction, as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557. 2.2 Fill Placement After processing the areas to receive fill, soils were generally spread in approximately 6 -inch lifts (when needed) , moisture- conditioned as needed to attain near -optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557. Compaction was achieved by use of heavy -duty construction equipment. Areas of fill in which either field density tests indicated less than 90 percent relative compaction or the soils exhibited nonuniformity and/or showed an inadequate or excessive moisture content, were reworked, recompacted, and retested until a minimum 90 percent relative compaction and near -optimum moisture content was achieved. Additionally, the relative compaction for the base materials directly beneath the asphalt pavement met or exceeded 95 percent Project No. 11 -2311 Page 1 May 3, 2012 23 2.4 Laboratory Testing Laboratory maximum dry density tests of representative onsite/import soils were performed in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. The results of these tests are presented in the table below. Table I — Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content SAMPLE I.D. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION MAXIMUMDRY OPTIMUM MOISTURE NUMBER DENSITY (PCn CONTENT (/Q C-1 Redish Brown Silty Sand with Gravel 130.5 8.5 AB -1 Crushed Aggregate Base 135.0 6.0 Field Density Testinr Field density testing was performed using the Nuclear -Gauge Method (ASTM Test Methods D2922- 96 and D3017 -96) and Sand Cone Method (ASTM Test Method D 1556). The test locations were within the proposed new street improvement. The results of the field density tests are summarized in Appendix A. The field density testing was performed in general accordance with the applicable ASTM standards and the current standard of care in the industry. In -situ soil density testing is intended to verify the effectiveness of the earthmoving operation in general and is performed on a spot -check basis; as such, some variations in relative compaction should be expected from the results documented herein. 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDA TIONS Grading operations for the subject improvement was performed in general accordance with the geotechnical recommendations made during the course of grading and the City of Encinitas requirements. It is our professional opinion that the subject grading is suitable for its intended commercial use provided proper landscaping, irrigation, and maintenance programs are implemented. 4.0 LIMITATIONS Our services were performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. Project No. 11 -2311 Page 2 May 3, 2012 The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can and do occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Project No. 11 -1311 Page 3 May 3, 2012 APPENDIX A Summary of Field Density Test Results TABLE 1 S UM MA R Y O F i 7 F, L D D E NS l 7 Y 7FS7 S 1 Ttat N Test 02/03/12 CG Westlake St (Southbound tare) SG Cl 126.4 7.1 131 97 2 N 02/03/12 CG Westlake St (Southbound tare) SG Cl 125.8 6.9 130.5 96 1 N 02/03/12 AB Westlake St (Southbound Lane) AB ABI 128.9 8.0 136.0 95 4 N 02/22/12 CG Westlake St (Southbound tare) SG Cl 1259 9.1 131 96 N 02/22/12 CG Westlake St (Swthba Lane) SG Cl 127.3 8.9 130.5 98 6 N 02/22/12 CG Westlake St (Southbound Late) SG Cl 126.5 7.6 130.5 97 7 N 02/22/12 CG una St (Westbound tare) SG Cl 126.9 7.8 130.5 97 8 N 02/22/12 AB Westlake St (SOU"Ouyd lane) AB ABI 1282 6.2 133.0 96 9 N 02122/12 AB Westlake St (Southbound tent) AB ABI 129.7 5.8 133.0 98 10 N 02/22/12 AB I Requen St (Westbound Iam) AB ABI 127.9 6.4 133.0 96 11 N 02/29/12 AB Westlake St (Southbound Lam) AB ABI 128.4 6.1 1 133.0 97 12 N 02/29/12 AB Westlake St (Southbound lam) AB ABI 129.1 5.9 133.0 97 13 N 02/29/12 AB Requeza St(Wenbound lane) AB ABI 128D 6.6 133.0 96 14 N 02/29/12 SW Westlake St (Southbound um) SG Cl 121.8 8.4 130.5 93 15 N 02/29/12 SW Westlake St (Southbound Iane) SG Cl 122.3 m 130.5 94 16 N 02/29/12 SW Westlake St (Southbound lam) Sc Cl 121.0 8.6 130.5 93 17 N 02/29/12 SW Rcqu St (Westbound lane) SG Cl 12Z9 7.9 130.5 94 N - Nuclear Test Method AB- Aggregate Base CG -Curb and Gutter SW- A*walk SG- Subgrade 41655 Reagan Way Sle. E Munneta, CA. 92562 ineerin Technolo ies Ph: (951) 894 -6464 Inland En g 9 9 Inc. Fax: (951) 894 -6491 May 14, 2012 Mr. James Brennan Pacific Coast Development 2750 Ynez Road #228 Temecula, CA 92590 Project No. 11 -2311 Subject: As- Graded Report for the Observation and Testing for Lots 1,3 and 4 Located at 680 Westlake Street, City of Encinitas, County of San Diego California. In accordance with your request and authorization, Inland Engineering Technologies Inc. (IET) has provided geotechnical services during the grading operations for the building pads for lots 1,3 and 4 located at 680 Westlake Street, City of Encinitas, Count of San Diego, California. The accompanying as- graded report summarizes our observations, field and laboratory test results, and the geotechnical conditions encountered during the grading operations at the subject site. Grading operations for the proposed subdivision were performed in general accordance with geotechnical recommendations made during the course of grading and the City of Encinitas grading requirements. If you have any questions regarding our report, please contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, INLAND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a� � es Worley � Operations Manager 7W/YG Distribution: (2) Addressee (y1�11 Yogi Pirathapan GE 2 _ Associate Geotechnical Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS Section II 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... ............................... 2 2.0 SUAI"YOF FIELD OPERATIONS ........................................................ ............................... 2 2.1 Site Preparation ..................................................................................... ............................... 2 2.2 Fill Placement 2 2.3 Laboratory Testing ................................................................................ ............................... 3 2.4 Field Density Testing ............................................................................ ............................... 3 3.0 CONCLUSIONS ANDRECOMbIENDATIONS ........................................... ..............................3 4.0 LIMITATIONS _ ......... ..............._.............4. LIST OF TABLES, APPENDICES, AND ILLUSTRATIONS Tables Table 1 — Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content Figures Plate 1 — Field Density Test Location Map Appendices Appendix A — Summary of Field Density Test Results rRi; In accordance with your request and authorization, JET has performed geotechnical observation and testing services for grading operations at the proposed subdivision located at 680 Westlake Sheet, City of Encinitas, California. The grading operations involved removal and recompaction for the proposed building pads. The earthwork operations during removal and recompaction were observed and tested under the supervision from a representative of 1ET. This as- graded report summarizes our geotechnical observations, field and laboratory test results and the geotechnical conditions encountered during the grading operations for the building pads. In addition, this report provides conclusions and recommendations for the proposed site work. The grading plan prepared by the Project Civil Engineer was utilized as a base map to present the approximate locations of the field density tests within the limits of the grading. The Field Density Test Location Map (Plate 1) is included in this report (rear of the text). The grading was performed by Pacific Coast Development. IET was not responsible for line and grade. 1.0 SUMMARY OFAS- GRADED CONDITIONAND FIELD OPERATIONS Grading work began and finished in November 2011. Grading operations included: 1) removal of buried debris surficial 2) removal of potentially compressible soils down to competent native soils and 3) placement of compacted fill soils to design grade. 2.1 Site Preparation Following remedial removals, which included buried debris, the removal bottoms were approved by a representative of IET, removals were 3 feet below the bottom of the new proposed footing and 5 feet outside the building footprint. Areas to receive fill were scarified a minimum of 6 inches, moisture- conditioned as needed to obtain a near - optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction, as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557. 1.1 Fill Placement After processing the areas to receive fill, native soils were generally spread in approximately 8 -inch lifts, moisture - conditioned as needed to attain near - optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Method 131557. Compaction was achieved by use of heavy -duty construction equipment. Areas of fill in which either field density tests indicated less than 90 percent relative compaction or the soils exhibited nonuniformity and/or showed an inadequate or excessive moisture content, were reworked, recompacted, and retested until a minimum 90 percent relative compaction and near - optimum moisture content was achieved. Project No. 11 -2311 Page 2 May 14, 2012 23 Laboratory Testine Laboratory maximum dry density tests of representative onsite /import soils were performed in general accordance with ASTM D1557. The results of these tests are presented in the table below. Table l — Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content 2.4 Field Density Testing Field density testing was performed using the Sand Cone Method (ASTM Test Method D 1556) and Nuclear -Gauge Method (ASTM Test Methods D2922 -96 and D3017 -96). The approximate test locations are shown on the Field Density Test Location Map (Plate 1). The results of the field density tests are summarized in Appendix A. The field density testing was performed in general accordance with the applicable ASTM standards and the current standard of care in the industry. In -situ soil density testing is intended to verify the effectiveness of the earthmoving operation in general and is performed on a spot -check basis; as such, some variations in relative compaction should be expected from the results documented herein. 3.0 CONCL USIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Grading operations for the site work at the proposed subdivision were performed in general accordance with the geotechnical recommendations made during the course of grading and the City of Encinitas requirements. It is our professional opinion that the subject subdivision building pads is suitable for its intended use from a geotechnical engineering standpoint, provided proper landscaping, irrigation, and maintenance program are implemented. The fill soils placed were primary fill. The purpose of this primary fill is to support the new proposed buildings. Project No. 11 -2311 Page 3 May 14, 2012 MAXIMUM OPTIMUM SAMPLE SAMPLE DESCRIPTION DRYDENSITY MOISTURE (PCF) CONTENT (%) C1 Reddish Brown Silty Sand with Gravel 130.5 8.0 C2 Reddish Brown Silty Sand with Gravel 135.5 8.0 2.4 Field Density Testing Field density testing was performed using the Sand Cone Method (ASTM Test Method D 1556) and Nuclear -Gauge Method (ASTM Test Methods D2922 -96 and D3017 -96). The approximate test locations are shown on the Field Density Test Location Map (Plate 1). The results of the field density tests are summarized in Appendix A. The field density testing was performed in general accordance with the applicable ASTM standards and the current standard of care in the industry. In -situ soil density testing is intended to verify the effectiveness of the earthmoving operation in general and is performed on a spot -check basis; as such, some variations in relative compaction should be expected from the results documented herein. 3.0 CONCL USIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Grading operations for the site work at the proposed subdivision were performed in general accordance with the geotechnical recommendations made during the course of grading and the City of Encinitas requirements. It is our professional opinion that the subject subdivision building pads is suitable for its intended use from a geotechnical engineering standpoint, provided proper landscaping, irrigation, and maintenance program are implemented. The fill soils placed were primary fill. The purpose of this primary fill is to support the new proposed buildings. Project No. 11 -2311 Page 3 May 14, 2012 4.0 LIMITATIONS Our services were performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. The samples taken and submitted for laboratory testing, the observations made and the in -situ field testing performed are believed representative of the entire building pad; however, soil and geologic conditions revealed by excavation may be different than our preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by the project soils engineer and geologist and design(s) adjusted as required or alternate design(s) recommended. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his/her representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and/or project engineer and incorporated into the plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and/or subcontractor properly implements the recommendations in the field. The contractor and/or subcontractor should notify the owner if they consider any of the recommendations presented herein to be unsafe. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can and do occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Project No. 11 -2311 Page 4 May 14, 2012 Re erences Martin Owen, 1009 Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed jour parcel residential subdivision located at 680 Westlake street Encinitas, California 91024. Project No. 09 -0117 Project No. 11 -2311 Page 2 May 14, 2012 APPENDIX A Summary of Field Density Test Results TABLE 1 SUMMARYOFRELD DENSITY 7TMN FNWIII14111 Cr Parcel 4 Northem Fill Slope 180 C1 I1 &4 101 1 131 91 2 N 1 11/14/11 CF Parcel4 Northern FO] Slope 182 CI 120.2 9.9 130.5 92 3 N 11/14/11 Cr Pa l4 Northern FM Slope 1&4 CI 118.0 94 130.5 90 4 N 11/14/11 CF Percel4 Northern Fill Slope 185 Cl 120.5 9.7 130.5 92 5 N 11/14/11 CF Parcel4 186 Cl 11 &5 10.0 130.5 91 6 N 11/14/11 CF Phr l3 186 CI 11 &9 8.9 130.5 91 7 N 11/14/11 CF Parcel 188 CI 120.4 91 1305 92 8 N 11/14/11 CF FBrcel 3 Northern FU Slope 189 Cl 121.6 9.5 130.5 93 9 N 11/14/11 CF Farcd4 190 Cl 118.8 9.6 130.3 1 91 10 N 11/14/11 CF Pareel3 191 Cl 117.8 10.1 130.5 90 11 N 1 11/14/11 CF Pared 4 193 CI 11 &6 9.5 130.5 91 12 N 11 /14/11 Cr Fa¢el4 195 Cl 11910 94 130.5 91 13 N 11/15/11 CF Parch 4 189 Cl 120.5 8.7 130.5 92 14 N 11/13/11 CF Pawd4 189 Cl 1214 910 130.5 93 15 N 11/15/11 CF Pa l3 190 C1 121.6 9.3 1905 93 16 N 11/15/11 CF Parcel 191 CI 119.7 9.1 130.5 92 17 N 11/15/11 Cr Parcel4 193 CI 118.9 101 130.5 91 18 N 11/16/11 CF Farcel4 194 Cl 1 120.6 1 &9 130.5 1 92 19 N 11/16/11 CF Fu el4 195 C1 1 1194 &7 130.5 91 20 N 1 11/16/11 CF Parcel3 195 CI 118.9 9.1 130.5 91 21 N 11/16/11 CF Parcel4 196 CI 120.2 9.0 130.5 92 22 N 11/16/11 CF Pamel3 196 CI 119.3 91 130.5 91 23 N 11 /IS /11 CF RrtuzunA WaB Foundation of Parcel l 201 CI 119.1 99 130.5 91 24 N 11 /I8 /11 CF RebLining Wall Foundation of Portal l 202 Cl 11 &9 &9 130.5 91 25 N 11/18/11 Cc Wall Slope of Nmcl1 204 CI 117.7 9.1 1304 91 26 N 11 /18 /11 CF Retaining Wall Slope of Poreell 205 Cl 119.9 9.5 130.5 92 27 N 11/18/11 CF REWmrig Wall Slope of Pan 11 205 CI I1 &5 1 10.0 190.5 91 28 N 11 /18/11 CF ReUuung Wall Slopt of Pa ell 206 Cl 1 1193 9.5 130.5 91 29 N 1 11/22/11 CF Parcel 1 Bum 208 Cl 121.6 9.6 1305 1 93 30 N II/7Z/It CF Pa l I Building 208 Cl 120.3 91 130.5 92 31 N 11/22/11 CF Parch I B 209 Cl 11 &4 9.7 130.5 91 32 N 11/22/11 CF Porcel 1 Builwns 209 Cl 1201 9.9 130.3 92 33 N 12/02/11 CF Pad 1 208 C1 1224 71 130.5 94 34 N 12/02/11 CF Pad 1 209 C1 121.9 &6 130.5 93 35 N 12/02/11 CF Pad 3 197 C2 122.1 &1 135.5 90 36 N 12/02/11 CF Pad 197 C1 123.4 1 7.9 130.5 95 37 N 12/05/11 CF Pod4 197.5 C2 1 1244 7.5 135.5 92 38 N 1 12/09/11 CF Pad 198 C3 1194 83 129.0 93 39 N 12/06/11 CF Fad 3 19 &9 C2 1223 9.6 135.5 90 40 N 12/06/11 CF Pad4 198 CI 121.4 84 130.5 93 41 N 12/07/11 CF Pad 1 210 CI 120.9 &9 130.5 93 42 N 1/11 2/08 FG Pad 1 211 CI 121.3 &0 130.5 93 43 N 08 12//11 FG Pad 199.5 C2 123.4 7.9 135.5 91 44 N 12/9/114 FG Pad 1991 C2 122.9 6.9 139.5 91 N - Nuclear Test Method CF- Compacted Fi11 M 71 TO FROM: RE: ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City Of Capital Improvement Projects l �,r` District Support Services Eminita Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL D �z(G� /o Subdivision Engineering U 1� 4t> {�-1 Public Service Counter Ce Name of Field Operations Private Contract Inspection Grading Permit NO. ii0q 33 C,.£ Name of Developer I CVl5 /GnoaSTDe Site Location (0&) iaddress .. number ... street name ....-...suffix2 dot? . (bldgj t have inspected the grading at the subject site and have verified certification of the pad by the Engineer of Work, /fiMk8renLVCk, dated and certification of soil compaction by the Soil Engineer, / ai4 datetl — — /Z 1 am hereby satisfied that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, Chapter 23.24 of the Municipal Code, and any other applicable engineering standards and specific project requirements. Based on my observation and the certifications, I take no exception to the issuance of a building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase 114t-, if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trait improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. 12- (Signature of Enginee nspecrorl (Da te)te) (Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if approptate) 15ate) Reference: Building Permit No. - -- Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. JSG /field3.docl TEL 760633 -2600 / FAX 760 -633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TOO 760 - 633 -2700 1� recycled paper CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: TELEPHONE: oUofm - 56-C r7�2 /T&,n1 4AIl 72f 4Af 47rE7vlJf (4r;;7 Cc��t7xsFC7v2 7U cf7w l�,N ,eE�rDy jb Sr�y 111-7111 rhn55 6W40ia/(, R-A), V(74fc7L--0 QWvsioN CC) -trtOL I/V n L R C E. t:, 41442 ETV- G, , n!t _ b Ad 626 j/ cam 3 T 4N r A16 /0,4-0 5-jGt- /i „ orc,s e7,jU. /}jot2q 6o77Dm 7o ftvzca,3 /1w4 cta-,S CY2 loeih,o t., -fed a4 S' /i io ,r sh2cez3 o.,y�[.ErE / c /E[.uS rnc�vEb -� ✓�ctz /s� Si {r �fl -Fi'rnC (/pir%�"� - fitt.c, K�yn•_,��t -- r� ,�z+�ryr�n,J /i /y /I ✓2rCYJ �4 � //f(.. UN.J�T.'- ,ir2CEL �+tl��-rL Iii �.� c, o /70 C rd f(Pbr,S Pr �ortS E7JCa 'S 7,t ItEZ -P . oAt&�vrzy J / c.c_ I vAl n mien IAJ PnG6&n a.T iit&54 b,,,He- woocuinpJ7F?7 17u- L./, -4s & -Wcot, u L W Auto /f/lou,v0 Lve(� JoL,7WE-:4S Un e&YL DUES' L✓�C� 57-- (ems t dr -O EEO lb 42 L Lr _ (, r C °NCtl h/17 a G/IAvo)nl(a C11Ek)5 "wog 7v PfiRCEL P�tZ- AN OvE,e X t7LE . 4kJE 77(6- O /eir oVE Cm17 -7o any/ Ln,.lICVW Cr�nt/�� /i ZWl/ m14429 h eocP gac-!C o2oM Uctc/mrA C,2,`ocz Nds, -fa(4n 4o!v cb Ar czs t4 can 9 o k';jio .4t f'rec-ei� r �A-45 06-- boU.0 K S nt ? 9 - . J� oaL=W /Wig 62,4- +Jctcz . A3sernls 7-v 64�rw --pntog-tow . o co..7) urn SE t s+ ~E 62,gvEL 47LID t."r7a L�1+47N cYmt od,, (Qr s p acrd . - Gaut -f� ok lb fu, e44d 4�c wa(f eces+EA,ald fi' L,,05-7Z,1" e. o w b"y t','sh°ad step of 4e? P �4(I W A,-c I /S Sh0,un c>n Plard 'v s tay. / Few GcC-o, p,rtt hove lb bedoKX( -lard layrd /h. .04 yu 14-e- 6",4-r- CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: / /-30 -I/ CeIP �v9u c�,�rn,vuEp, F257- 3Ccxc(/2-S&& /+79§E)?- / W fb6Wi- C0UZL;E n1.aCFrn /c1 LHC/E12 ply v� G2r� ' .�r>/hf< /r�po2T �� c L —"7ZM 17-1 12 -1-1 /t7ootlLej�(_ !Ey5'Dnr (N (L. /-fits gelFro Can2pLE7r1J OEX rZ -S -fI //)11-)oaT f �2c6L 1 /5 6&777n6 mosT- of A-rE- AS L(aJ(, nS FEZ- q,, s410/43 7LrH lNL2N 177 -)to- C A IOLx S V Sp cc] ft ff. 11 �T (VAMNUES - fifr +/- - 1b tJ.AOw.rr 'l/ yzAjE� 4NJ r utz -+ !S�F o wWli C3lZl /icYx� �f e[� . 5DWO cc>"7n/tJuL- -s �� 02Ar~rT RELc�ca{/7o1�1 2k- O P/C'S lca /tT Conr77tilU0S ivt "IOROu� F +"L f?T� AFuw ( /Z- 6 T7 -/4> (5 ComI)L 7E70. Ebue5el QEST of F= 2o$coN Curjnte� 09cgw &1 Td 3E 6peFt, jc L%LC57- OF- Sr LT F.,--rycr� ^,/e-L-o5 7a 6E /I4sj -,q ,tyj 1z -fz -lr K L 9 6( ti tea tIJ 0177 0/44( r2mS(O.) Ca r OL, /a&7ZlR -,ueW TD 5 irE L/4ibn- A ,,Q S R S -'r1.0 O i N 5 riqu_(,J Lo S c L.T c.&. 9t','4-0 `U 1JE- nr/ivb 0/,/ = ST- S t fie- 0,47 pU (_5i LAKE ,G./,4 -s ST,*�KL� Tao�t / • C,� -u..� g /L� /�— y,uL3r� 'r-)/ w r A/ ry ,a.9 2c t#z -ro 3 67 A �o cicL—In C?,r 1.kc4 7v rYt uD . -,L Gv.Rs( SK4� 6L I erL.L_ rn *T7En/47 14- P2E-EG tvo /-rE 57-t -r- AT T%) L-0 12-2o-(f qA" Fr-C CAB t, ,,0L:Tl1 G ilu Ems, 5pW(p -tD 57Yt-RT -rwp `WAu- ou-oujorj Uses, 14l(E 12 -2/ -1/ fWWO /w(57YUtC Two WHTEIZ 5cywrcFS a/..i wt37z.rrcEs7 -. -13 -1Z ON- s TvpA-y, m14429 t/Y/h�/vv cnvr(r� #(L -LCV IWL,106H THg7- 6WLi• dEP7. CITY OF ENCINITAS — ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROTECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: n 47 n7- !9 wf s nrE- � E? em Av vcrn>�v c union.[ 6 bcp7- coA.77mAES. ! 77 n2 �l3/)rz 71 YJ .SEt .�YL t t Arlo C a"AJEzA 4r- 774E ;H A) 77AE71�c- 'n5 'o' of Coi1&-Jt @ 4- OhiO 6 -I' A-7 -llhAW F3" E • O cE C"r- O✓ w Itp sTEEL ARWI )s [,yzC,o • v c. A t5o (1Ste 7v E?l5U2E 77L-"7- cmn/n/fGAd �' o� 3�.�, 2uct n unirlr� � R 7�ete3� .SVInS T�3T /�4 �Ficu Sflow 90 Y'• i ( eo•p4r#oU. � �L T CnLO /lr crJ • A� or`iI EL Sc f 4t�tf[ � Fbt , / 40. C3u.r e marmu! !I 3r I L s�W E2 � ,g3'�Ygc. C onn u �T7ati1 Mn4-A E FD 2 /fr2 c EZ 3 , 1 /t'- %t�Fie�) cUnr�lEz71aV r4nlO 2` /-� FyF{.L • StT AIoT'�,� o� �I Z7. 3'A.�c ,o4ip(x-t�irc�fb IV," 1u-1 /Z &V ern Exrr -507w cu &Ar 7'24c- t,A g-r .5ioc- oe- (vkz cu»� 7a rZ 645 F SEL.T7� . tar i` ',ce( C o ,Lrl -k !LA2.a rNcatrN� un�a rr r+opc� bv�ts 'iD _� A'►rRC b W r 7TH Sf E L oS - 5^VCLF W 5 /k )A7+ -br rr ro lo ill- pAUG-nevT A -$446 U` Uq,o sr�x--r I kP b � S W14iJ 6vt3Tl%e� oCp 21(a112- Jug P-14i P , -No hv,T q E 6ouO -o &(�Tt'wsrs -•U94%j,�. I � �� W4c' �raxC h-atE CumN(� Co2arc-)L o.� GN w:e-lwvw C,"LeO Biu-. A-0-1(5-CD `N sf'T ulo nlc*455 zX s Dc 'fb.vIW"w rtf LA' 'r LP "' "W- ! -mom work m14429 Z,NS o[- -M65 'Tp.eoj6,q rA( RSCZ�on� &)Loo rkt. -f4t/d .0 2e7-U9A) u b tf& bok)Af lo l, " .Srb f+u-c er 7Fs'-&v 1."- 95-% t-c/ eo -p. b{ &e /01 AIC4.9 C1. FAST CD� A�tQ9 USrM �t (o' C07T fUr- �IEt� fnlS�tZ�o r� AtN Iu�SE*i�'. cu»� 7a rZ 645 F SEL.T7� . tar i` ',ce( C o ,Lrl -k !LA2.a rNcatrN� un�a rr r+opc� bv�ts 'iD _� A'►rRC b W r 7TH Sf E L oS - 5^VCLF W 5 /k )A7+ -br rr ro lo ill- pAUG-nevT A -$446 U` Uq,o sr�x--r I kP b � S W14iJ 6vt3Tl%e� oCp 21(a112- Jug P-14i P , -No hv,T q E 6ouO -o &(�Tt'wsrs -•U94%j,�. I � �� W4c' �raxC h-atE CumN(� Co2arc-)L o.� GN w:e-lwvw C,"LeO Biu-. A-0-1(5-CD `N sf'T ulo nlc*455 zX s Dc 'fb.vIW"w rtf LA' 'r LP "' "W- ! -mom work m14429 Z,NS o[- -M65 'Tp.eoj6,q rA( RSCZ�on� &)Loo rkt. -f4t/d CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: TELEPHONE: 2 - / - / Z AFL /G �9OES Q ut�H7aG��S// S7Ej0 S /bN� � eo KS av GYM Nk3T AIIA �1�7y s e-c7''s -b sF ;&-- Nmz�. S-lnld ca f is � t� by !� /rlr, -ib ud �uS'I" aS h �C.�SS ?rte 5 t+W r � P EELC -0 Ai e K Aw-p y- /.9t/c Q:P 44,y4.c4 L Z2-/2 Ste( Rr9r�� rnRpFr�ao wpQourz�. CL tt �ir� G ,oE rtl Cis rrr/ n/G �tC�,aBoc4�7+�z 2 -1-3 •-/L C2r;Nr5 F224gr,7tE0 C.Lxr26 V- 6) TZ!t 'tL+- 0>4t7. 70Yo or-- Fba. -ls /- ppO-o0c- -n . S +�ku- W� ( 24 T•i(),, `mm.o R -2aA `Ayv\ (;-X---f GTH wr2 5po�c.,r '7u ^QjELN EgSnNL .S 0EWAi1L- iS rNSnq-a�. A 61Ars Fi44-L-S 71,1 Guam -, c.rJ of l /A-uik u.D Gr 2 a- . i0 oU v,-tt 6--ac- K-a a 504,N-D cua.6 Cc" L Zz -iz cure c�u,/ nun rS#W 5+7-,E oN 3 occ+i;(unrs Fhc 6Uo-4 M CvljraoL. PL.fr-f,15 It S�Z.S :F12, E3n 1-27-iZ Ato t)•c-n.,Al c- m E1-H/tk r-Cyr- e.rtnl. 2Z8 -iZ Ss1gGr�c Bev, rh,, -roc Fn2 A]Fw Cu a %4 6w7E K. s15 L 2- Zq -IL 5,D EW R-i-K S116611A-jL- 6L�^l 7NC1EIJ . r-v Aefn ta(. 7b/N o22o �1 . G�4-SS IL 6AS� . ('c�.noAGnonl T7�� /Jftss�. Scar fFSE /Dave -�. 3 7-7rr7 E5 i::;eL- / u<e ,n4 (W CT DL • 3 / A-AtF) � 6"i(g&V vU� vtin� ,4 a37N r�-SAJt- rs /1i?- o� /4--o /47th 3 -5 ty Aer 61u, A-r 5,ri5-, -ro 6eT 4 5rop 5 1bN AW. SJ , Ne_=S 6E L C ,� -)ACt 4 Ac 6AO((ril tmr I'Iz' - 4" D/1op or-F 214429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: TELEPHONE: ; hr /tL RE- EV/rWtr7t�- —17U2S . 3115 blCt- Fle4 -" / wt- VAf- er77c+N- DUE lV on / tuu24 a kjos 6A5 enAAJ / 7Lw Ptrr'17ML7.. S/J( dv -7je -/,7-5 -hr:5 t4,E�X So -iAL,,� Ca„ he ¢cic -Mlle%/ I Con,�t? 47teg 1, .rrBflSU7R � Grp �arv�s CAT./ hn/rsN b�. 12- UE PAUSNEW —1rt5 SE72v /cL5 07LiVO - - l L - C44kWS 19/v6P -7b Sr 77 � 7�lcF m ls6" j& r7oOJ o� 7j vrl cUlf6fr LrTrM/ �ri1t7 3 //�Qu/tZ/L, tL6�7 — %�ow,US�tayri� t�7�rti� or,t (�U�STLrt� A{ 1, �?R�tMI N Bt'71c �� DrDPS • l/lSr iL-� 51% 3 06,+s5 /m6 7p Moiv /7lX G2�i 'art. Cr ,�/ 571 &7m `�i of :tar clg� .A, TI tE -, � b.�l l u r 7a-le Q� CoLio Mo/ buco &.7- Arlo C&Aoft 6t4oQ7 AdgL, hI L A *c / (/c' r C- ZC J7ay. Ls Ilzi4 oN SiT� 77nLt, L QO�k 1L ccw�Aci/aJ , -rr -IZ u ftr4ivry DttC 7D o Acnvr y y -lz -lz rm a'red an ogfsr s, - o (/t,c�Tt.rrKE . - 5 L, 7- f , A /A, `%Ft „ �( a fon ail cur &--2rsh E'•�U irElL �jen1D /�lV ON Lr2.,gT)oN. C G QC^J Qr cM r1w SrrE oN 3 oc sious Fl>c A-U7y CJti1-)f,0L . -l(o-iZ Ac retie //usmuLz o�-i E)tsr s,oF of WercE. . a-T-EZ ALUGh NiS E , 4-IS- +L L sr Srio o ee up /rr 11 AM . 5 c3 pbw ; o j 5 )1 4. ,nn,G 42rs7.ir is fLESr�r(J1 ay � J . 14721tk 'Iq -IZ L t'm -rert �lAt (3 t - /ltkvs wofkrkrt, oAJ 124 M CiRADrw;_ 11,/U 099, SITS To Sc3'IZ CA2LE�j &ia nbdf .571cifl/S oT Inac4l bwAA, T o^j 4440A 70 3c- 5lk >qe— .7 A o �#ec/ "r,* MoSfq � -,snAs Aio,se' rv4 nloW , knkC•w' oN m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: 5 -17 -2 filRr , LL utZ Le�p� A, 7V A S 'I't 51 Lh/hvca,'b 6-6- /2 FCt7VEV Z t,e77ER5 RZt SoI15 l5WGiNt -7L- 77-/EiA IdILL, •do -7-17- A EIUE� - u(LTS• fDL t?L 7ix{ 7 7 /Z 5leQE 1,-) ufco1AAG s< ,c/OUSE 7 efl- L.i.0H5 f E] S 7V4d ate" a M IS 7M-Kg ,<iL_,iLIi, `rr/alr- o�J BU./E Gn,rtd . DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: TELEPHONE: r-gom Our&, ALSO .trP �ftL ar /Nto n/A/0 2 hE 15 fiAI+UA/6 6s497n14. rS t r✓As A" Ag7& 5, 6 -qrA![ Z On- Si � tv ReSV-claO , �W SE o C- b s 1 ofF bluff fnrto �tT �t�Sr�NG t9 72iltL CsKt pq Aa1 - G NAid _ U13r Cu2b t< _ QA�A/7$7 Z On- Si � tv s nStu(lp W 1 WQS o S � nnei„or lrarf 2i..tb aua nr/- AlUD n ✓ &T la Con�Le%r l CS luhC/l do S -SG/ ct ervt9� X z L r� �� !'4r /�2WSsrTE ,4 cws-f. � mac, ¢ ntcp'ed. t01110117- 4904n 9dC,f./i4,4L5o� EuGrueeX 1.,E+6-JLt"Z7. -, /Igsrz , mu'o 6AarnE'7D �'11y}SrH, /1L72ELrnta.4r tw Dv, Mow pm/.21N COn lgvac.,e pcly. A Lon S � nnei„or lrarf 2i..tb aua nr/- onST .6 APPrpvrd b1h105• App/louta0 #or.0 LCY,+TPVAJ� ARAP D 7�ls FAY- 4t, n. a nias . 64j1- bp-, 'fb dace 3 y °< nhf / /�lylrL /1 rN6b*1 Vt5r75 LAST S&EWAt- 44p L-FWSu/Ittik� E,o�N(, m14429 3 %4''GQsWe1t ,SI,� �ittfiSfi, � t'�Ltarrv(�07 Sor✓_ CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NAME: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: 3 4-e>TS S�anlEt� o �v. occc��o�inl�j. Pos7- G)NST. ,BmP-� 1,7s)oLyIMm, awl/ /,h -GgAot-) clRT &,6-mE-n 47E — vt�v m14429 C I T Y OF E N C I N 1 T A S / ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 50S S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 10433 GI PARCEL NO. : 258 -121 -1100 JOB SITE ADDRESS: 680 WESTLAKE STREET APPLICANT NAME WESTLAKE HOMES LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 27450 YNEZ RD, STE 228 CITY: TEMECULA STATE: CA ZIP CONTRACTOR : PACIFIC COAST DEVELOPMENT GROUP LICENSE NO.: 965484 ENGINEER : LANDMARK CONSULTANTS PERMIT IS 4/11 PERMIT DATE. 10/2 2 INSPECT R: TODD BAUMBACH PLAN NO_: 10433 CASE NO.: 07164 / CDP PHONE NO.: g5i-�DiCJ�Q�ir7� 92591 - PHONE NO.: LICENSE TYPE: B -1 PHONE NO.: 858 -587 -8870 PERMIT ISSUED BY: LLVL --------- - - - - -- - - - - -- ERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS ---------------------------- 1. PERMIT FEE .00 2. GIS MAP FEE 375.00 3. INSPECTION FEE 5,278.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 5. NPDES INSPT FEE 1,055.00 6. SECURITY DEPOSIT 109,288.00 7. FLOOD CONTROL FE 1,031.00 8. TRAFFIC FEE .00 9. IN -LIEU UNDERGRN .00 10.IN -LIEU IMPROVMT .00 ll.PLAN CHECK FEE .00 12.PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 --- ---------------- -- - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------------------- PERMIT TO GUARANTEE BOTH PERFORMANCE AND LABOR /MATERIALS FOR EARTHWORK, DRAINAGE, PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS, AND EROSION CONTROL. TRAFFIC CONTROL MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES PER W.A.T.C.H. STANDARDS AND /OR APPROVED PLAN. LETTERED DATED 3/28/2011 (REVISED OCT.3,2011)APPLIES. - - -- INSPECTION --------- - ------ DATE -- - - - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED — /(e '/Z_ ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION 'S SIGNATURE - - -- I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. iSIGNATURE DATE SIGNED RINT NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3. OTHER ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 CONTRACTOR : W.E.G. ENGINEERING IMPROVEMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 10433 II PARCEL NO. 258- 121 -1100 ENGINEER PLAN NO.: 10433I JOB SITE ADDRESS: 680 WESTLAKE STREET CASE NO.: 07164 / CDP APPLICANT NAME WESTLAKE HOMES LLC 7. FLOOD CONTROL FE MAILING ADDRESS: 27450 YNEZ RD, STE 228 PHONE NO.: 951- 695 -9555 CITY: TEMECULA .00 STATE: CA ZIP: 92591- .00 CONTRACTOR : W.E.G. ENGINEERING LICENSE NO.: 716878 INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: FINANCIAL POLICY NO. : 178716C ENGINEER : LANDMARK CONSULTANTS PERMIT ISS 11 PERMIT EXP DATE: 10/2 INSPECT TODD BAUMBACH PHONE NO.: 619- 921 -7114 LICENSE TYPE: A PACIFIC INS CO POLICY EXP. DATE: 1/06/12 PERMIT ISSUED B _______ ________________ __ PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS HON NO 858 -587 -8870 Y: ---- ------------------ - - - - -- 1. PERMIT FEE .00 2. GIS MAP FEE .00 3. INSPECTION FEE 2,626.00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 5. NPDES INSPT FEE 525.00 6. SECURITY DEPOSIT 52,520.00 7. FLOOD CONTROL FE .00 8. TRAFFIC FEE .00 9. IN -LIEU UNDERGRN .00 10.IN -LIEU IMPROVMNT .00 ll.PLAN CHECK FEE .00 12.PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 ------------------- - -- - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ---------- ----------- ---- - - -- -- PERMIT TO GUARANTEE THE PERFORMANCE AND LABOR AND MATERIALS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED IMPROVEMENT PLAN #10433 -I. CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN TRAFFIC CONTROL AT ALL TIMES PER W.A.T.C.H. STANDARDS AND APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN. LETTER DATED MARCH 28TH, 2011 APPLIES. TRENCH REPAIR PER CITY OF ENCINITAS STANDARD TRENCH REPAIR DETAIL. INSPECTION --------- ------- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION /6-17 -/l FINAL INSPECTION & -7- /7- 1 "" ---------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ---- - - - --- AS- BUILTS AND ONE YEAR WARRANTY RETENTION REQUIRED. I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT PENALTY Y THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS ATURE PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3. OTHER AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER TRUE. 21- _�)o DATE SIGNED _ r { TELEPHONE NUMBER May 6, 2010 Larry Baker 124 Seeman Drive Encinitas, CA 92024 Ref: Permission to Grade Dear Larry, Paul Gozzo & Jerry E. Sawtelle P.O. Box 1705 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 APN 258 — 121 — 12 i.d JIE LI AUG 9 2010 ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS Per our recent meeting you indicated you were processing a grading plan for your 4 unit Development at 680 Westlake Street. We discussed the possibility of you doing some grading on our above referenced property, which is immediately west of your proposed Parcel 1. The purpose of the grading would be to fill a small "valley" between our properties. This would create a little larger useable side yard for your property and at the same time create a larger flat area on our property. I have reviewed your proposed grading on our property, attached as Exhibit "A" and dated April 26, 2010. I do not have any problem with your proposal and hereby give you permission to grade on our property as defined in Exhibit "A" with the following conditions: 1. All costs would be your responsibility. 2. You will have a Licensed Soils Engineer perform compaction tests of the fill and provide to me certification of the grading. 3. The existing fence along our common property line where the grading will take place as shown on Exhibit "A ", will be replaced in like kind [chain link fence], or with a mutually agreed upon alternative if you decide you would prefer not to have a chain link fence. 4. Drainage will be as shown on Exhibit "A ". Do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. We look forward to the successful completion of your project. Sipcerely, Paul Gozzo ankJe Y elle Owners Encl. - I • EX l ' I lJ (x � � REMO EU C +TREES 1 o q -26 -I� n I oyo tG � �o � . u I ti rp• 020 `l SEE HEET p. o°j y MAT NE co L r GRAVITY O ` . WALL R 8 PROVIDE 1 E I EARTHEN',S- 1 TO DIRECT \) ATER Z -t TO CATGFi OVE BURY .., x\00 `\ 1' r1"` ✓1 G EXISTIN �\ �., t ~L WALL ' REMOVE - ,— u• �2`FLAT AReA TO piT ; A I.tAU }S f�. PARCEL 1 FOR Pj -%) RE % — APN 258 -12'f- P.I►�z�ro GW�+fl 1 5 j -^ h SB 210 -� } REMOVE— - OHL 211 "� Memo To: Ruben Macabitas, Engineering From: James Knowlton, Geotechnical Consultant Date: 4/20/2010 Re: Review of Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Four - Parcel Residential Subdivision, 680 Westlake Street, Encinitas, CA 92024 Reference: "Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Four - Parcel Subdivision, 680 Westlake Street, Encinitas, CA," by Martin R. Owen, dated November 12, 2009 In response to your request I have reviewed the referenced document. My review was to determine if the subject report is in conformance with the requirements of the City of Encinitas municipal code and with general standards of care. Based upon my review the report requires a few items to be in conformance with the requirements of the City of Encinitas. Those items are: 1. Normally, the City of Encinitas requires all geotechnical reports and grading plans to be signed by both a Registered Civil Engineer or Geotechnical Engineer and a Certified Engineering Geologist. Because the site has no significant grading and does not create any large cut or fill slopes and is not in any geotechnical hazard zone, that requirement will not be required for this report or grading plan. 2. The City of Encinitas requires that the entire lot be graded and certified as buildable. Please have the geotechnical engineer change his grading requirements for removals and recompaction from 5 -feet outside of the building envelope to the entire lot. 3. No slope stability analyses were provided with the geotechnical report. Please have the geotechnical engineer provide both gross and surficial stability analyses to support his statements. 4. The geotechnical engineer should review the proposed grading plan and provide a statement that it in accordance with his recommendations and provide any additional recommendations, if necessary. �. 4730 Noyes Street #402, San Diego, CA 92109 Tel: 619-813-8462, Fax: 858-273.1652 Email: martinowen @geotechengineer.com Job No. 091027 November 12, 2009 To: Mr. Larry Baker Subject: Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Four - Parcel Residential Subdivision 680 Westlake Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Dear Mr. Baker: In accordance with your request, the undersigned has performed a geotechnical investigation at the subject site, relative to the proposed, four -parcel residential subdivision The scope of work performed for this investigation consisted of the following: • Review of published geologic maps and other background information, • Subsurface exploration, • Geotechnical analysis and preparation of this report containing my findings, conclusions y and recommendations. In addition, I was provided with a set of survey plans, prepared by Coastal Land Solutions, date of survey January 5, 2007, and a Tentative Parcel Map prepared by The Sea Bright Company, dated March 18, 2008. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development consists of a four -parcel, residential subdivision. Parcels 1, 3 and 4 will be developed for new, single - family residences. Parcel 2, which is occupied by an existing single - family residence, will not be developed. The tentative parcel map indicates that site grading will consist primarily of minor fills. Minor fill slopes are planned. A 6-feet high maximtun, retaining wall will be constructed between Parcels 1 and 2. SITE DESCRIPTION The property is located northwest of the intersection of Westlake and Requeza Streets (see following Vicinity Map). The site is irregular in shape with an area of 0.85 acres. Geote c hnical Investigation Proposed Four Parcel Residential Subdivision 600 Westlake Street, Encinitas, CA 92024 Page 2 Job No. 091027 November 12, 2009 The southerly portion of the site slopes moderately down to a relatively level area, partially occupied by an existing, one -story residence and adjacent, smaller structures, concrete slabs and asphalt driveway. A steep slope descends about 10 feet at the north end of the site. There is some scattered debris in the northwest portion of the site. Vegetation consists of trees, bushes and groundcover. VICINITY MAP 0 s` Encinit+a we.e.my �.� y o...namnNy �a :j J� EDS, •01. c , S l 'uTT.r Vlry. L„ ,� 6n.mu Le ul St Encltlitas p,a , , s� a"w.make St Encinitas s o SIDE J 0 u - - MOe.i Lt p r a.,e... el L Mae. ae i Im,s w�yd � —s aw .ebv• JWAKEOe �� ° ° ` s�....�•v�... �n SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION The subsurface exploration consisted of hand - augering five test borings to a maximum depth of 5 feet on October 27, 2009. The approximate locations of the test borings are shown on the attached Plot Plan, Figure 1. The soils encountered in the test borings are described below. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Borings B -1, 134 B -5. and B -6 Residual soil consisting of light brown, dry, loose to medium dense, silty sand was encountered in Borings B -1, 134, B -5, and B -6 to depths of 6 inches to 1 foot. Dense sandstone bedrock was encountered below that. Martin R. Owen PE, GE Geotechnical Engineer Geotechnical Investigation Page 3 Proposed Four Parcel Residential Subdivision Job No. 091027 680 Westlake Street, Encinitas, CA 92024 November 12, 2009 Borings B -2 and B -3 Fill or residual soil consisting of orange brown to light brown, dry to moist, loose to medium dense, silty sand was encountered in Borings B -2 and B -3 to depths of 4 feet and 3 feet, respectively. Dense sandstone bedrock was encountered below that. The onsite soils are predominantly sandy and very low expansive, with an Expansion Index less than 20. No groundwater or seepage was encountered. GEOLOGY From published, California Division of Mines and Geology maps of the area, dated 1996, the site is underlain by dense, sandstone bedrock of the Torrey Sandstone Formation. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND SEISMICITY There are no known geologic hazards, such as landsliding or mapped earthquake faults at the site. However, buildings are subject to ground shaking and possible damage from earthquakes on nearby, or more distant, active faults. SEISMIC DESIGN VALUES The following 2007 CBC seismic design values were obtained using the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program (based on the 2006 International Building Code). SEISMIC DESIGN VALUES Seismic Parameters Seismic Design Values S. (Based on Site Classification B, F, =1.0 1.351 SI (Based on Site Classification B, F„ = 1.0) 0.507 Actual Site Classification C Site Coefficient, F, 1.0 Site Coefficient, F, 1.3 Maximum Spectral Response for Short Period, SMs = F.S. 1.351 Maximum Spectral Response for 1 Second Period, SMI = FMS I 0.660 Design Spectral Response, SDS = 2/3 x %m 0.901 Design Spectral Response, SDI = 2/3 x SMI 0.440 Martin R. Owen PE, GE Geotechntcal Bhgtneer Geote c hnical Investigation Proposed Four Parcel Residential Subdivision 680 Westlake Street, Encinitas, CA 92024 Page 4 Job No.091027 November 12, 2009 CONCLUSIONS From a geotechnical standpoint, the site is suitable for the proposed four - parcel, residential subdivision The following recommendations should be incorporated into the design and construction of the project. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. EARTHWORK • Removal of Surface Obstructions Any surface obstructions, debris and vegetation should be removed from the site prior to grading. • Removal of Loose Surface Soils In general, dense bedrock exists close to the ground surface. However, pockets of loose surface soils were encountered to a depth of about 4 feet on Parcels 3 and 4. In graded areas, any loose soils should be removed down to dense natural soils or bedrock. Removal depths should be verified by the Geotechnical Engineer during grading. • Overeacavation of Building Pads In addition to the above, building pads should be overexcavated to sufficient depth to provide a 3 feet minimum thickness of compacted fill beneath buildings. The limits of pad overexcavation should extend a minimum distance of 5 feet outside building areas. • Fill Suitability The on -site soils may be reused as compacted fill provided they are free of debris, organic materials, and cobbles or rock fragments over 6 inches in dimension. Import fill soil should be predominantly sandy and low expansive and approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. • Compaction and Method of Filling Prior to placing fill, the exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches, moistened or dried to slightly above optimum moisture conditions, and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. All fill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent as determined by ASTM D1557. Fill should be placed at slightly above optimum moisture conditions, in lifts 6 to 8 inches thick, with each lift compacted by mechanical means. Fill slopes should also be compacted to at least 90 percent. Martin R. Owen PE, GE Geotechnica I Engineer Geote c h nical Investigation Proposed Four Parcel Residential Subdivision 680 Westlake Street, Encinitas, CA 92024 Page 5 Job No. 091027 November 12, 2009 Utility trench backfill located in building areas and beneath pavements should be compacted to at least 90 percent. Retaining wall backfill should also be compacted to at least 90 percent. All earthwork, fill placement and compaction should be performed in accordance with the grading requirements of the City of Encinitas. Grading observation and fill placement and compaction should be observed and tested as necessary by the Geotechnical Engineer. SLOPE STABILITY The proposed fill slopes and the existing slope at the north end of the site should be grossly and surficially stable, provided fill slopes are properly compacted and slopes are planted with appropriate deep-rooted vegetation. 2. FOUNDATIONS • Footing Depths One and two -story residential buildings may be supported on continuous and/or individual footings in compacted fill at a minimum depth of 18 inches. Footing depths should be measured below lowest adjacent ground surface or building pad grade, whichever is deeper. Footings near the tops of slopes should extend to sufficient depth to provide a minimum horizontal distance of 7 feet between the bottom outside edge of the footing and the face of the slope. • Reinforcing of Footings Minimum reinforcing of continuous footings should consist of four No. 5 rebars, placed two at the top and two at the bottom of the footing. • Allowable Soil Bearing Value Footings in compacted fill may be designed for an allowable, dead plus live bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot, with a one -third increase for all loads, including wind or seismic. • Lateral Load Resistance Lateral loads may be resisted by passive pressures in compacted fill soils. An allowable passive pressure of 300 pcf may be used. A soil/concrete friction factor of 0.35 may also be used for footings in compacted fill. When combining frictional and passive resistance, the passive resistance should be reduced by one - third. Martin R. Owen PE, GE GeotechnicaI Engineer Geotechnical Investigation Page 6 Proposed Four Parcel Residential Subdivision Job No. 091027 680 Westlake Street, Encinitas, CA 92024 November 12, 2009 • Anticipated Settlement Total and differential building settlement should be less than 1/2 inch for footings designed as above. • Cleaning and Inspection of Footing Excavations Footing excavations should be thoroughly cleaned of loose soils. The Geotechnical Engineer should inspect and approve the footing excavations prior to placing reinforcing steel. 3. FLOOR SLABS Floor slabs should be at least 5 inches thick and reinforced with No. 4 rebars placed at 18 inches on centers in two directions and supported on concrete blocks at mid - height in the slab. Floor slabs should be underlain by 4 inches of clean sand. A 10 -mil visqueen moisture barrier should be placed at mid- height in the sand layer. Some shrinkage cracking of floor slabs is possible. 4. EXTERIOR SLABS AND DRIVEWAYS Exterior slabs and concrete driveways should be at least 5 inches thick and reinforced with No. 4 rebars placed at 18 inches on centers in two directions and supported on concrete blocks at mid - height in the slab. Slabs should be underlain by 4 inches of clean sand. Expansion joints should be provided at 10 feet maximum spacings. Some shrinkage cracking of exterior slabs is possible. 5. RETAINING WALLS Cantilever retaining walls may be designed using the following soil values: • Active, equivalent fluid soil pressure (level backfill) = 40 pcf • Active equivalent fluid soil pressure (2:1 sloping backfill) = 60 pcf The above soil values assume that retaining walls will be properly drained. Wall drainage consisting of a perforated pipe at the base of the wall surrounded by fabric - wrapped drain rock to at least half the height of the wall should be provided. Alternatively, J -Drain composite fabric and pipe may be used for wall drainage. The onsite soils are suitable for wall backfill provided they meet the requirements for fill specified previously. For retaining wall foundation design, please refer to the previous Foundations section. Martin R. Owen PE, GE Geotechnical Engineer Geotechnical Investigation Page 7 Proposed Four Parcel Residential Subdivision Job No. 091027 680 Westlake Street, Encinitas, CA 92024 November 12, 2009 6. DRAINAGE Surface drainage should be directed away from building foundations. Roof gutters and downspouts should be provided and connected to solid outlet pipes that discharge water away from foundations to an approved outlet. LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are subject to field conditions and may be modified, as necessary, during construction. This report should be considered valid for a period of three (3) years, and is subject to review and possible change following that time. If significant modifications are made to the building and/or grading plans, revision of this report may also be necessary. This report provides no warranty, either expressed or implied, concerning future building performance. Future damage from geotechnical or other causes is a possibility. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call or contact me. Very truly yours, AA^XaVt1-"' Martin R Owen PE, GE Geotechnical Engineer Attachment: Figure 1, Plot Plan Na 23155 Exp. 12131/09 OF C Martin R. Owen PE, GE Geotechnical Engineer No. G.E. 000658 Erp• 12/31109 Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Four Parcel Residential Subdivision 680 Westlake Street, Encinitas, CA 92024 Page 8 Job No. 091027 November 12, 2009 FIGURE I PLOT PLAN .;QJ4 �.. 1, :i Ta -� rnXac r wns ai £, a � 1, :i Ta 2 ( , 704IN� � REQt;EZA 1, :i �.. •r , rY 1a0T7�3- ac. ' SEE REPORT TEXT FOR DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE SOELS LEGEND B -5 0 APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF TEST BORINGS Martin R. Owen PE, GE Geotechnical Engineer Ta 2 ( , 704IN� � �.. •r , rY 1a0T7�3- ac. ' SEE REPORT TEXT FOR DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE SOELS LEGEND B -5 0 APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF TEST BORINGS Martin R. Owen PE, GE Geotechnical Engineer n, WE L; AUG 9 2010 IFOJ ENGINEERING FRVIC HYDROLOGY REPORT L cirr or ENcS,I ns •: BAKER 4 LOT SUBDIVISION 680 WESTLAKE STREET 10433 - G 07 -164 TPM /CDP, APN 258 — 121 - 11 Prepared For Larry Baker 124 Seeman Drive Encinitas, CA 92024 Prepared By Robert Sukup The Sea Bright Company 4322 Sea Bright Place Carlsbad, CA 92008 760 - 720 - 0098 March 22, 2010 ? No .c sog Ezp. 3}31 1 O Q RowGy REPO oI- i64 TPM - CDp -TkE: PRaP�cj) PRo7"cGT 1s F01? -1 51IjaLs FAw iL,- -/ WTS, 74c- EYIs- ING PAOMP-7y C 5o) Ac2Es GR v) N4s AN EXISTING HOUSE WITH A LARGE SEMl-r- %RC..& pRlVE0J,4� � �E�t12AL Acr.�SS012y 3UI1.01�1G5 � COUcRE't� Sl1�l�i5. No HOQSE PLANS AE p,VAILABLE Ym-7. I AM GOING TO A550ME -NL % IMPtRV100 To BE 33° /a. CZSQO� of IwOSE, 0\,UN, * FwT opx ON A 1J AURA SE .lC 00 � �R Q USE FOU-oUJ IN SOIL TYPF, = D E5 4 Tom= 5 MAN' .GTNs OSC MINIMUTA p0E To s4ORTER ANO UsE OF PI PeS T = G•5 RGQIzE 3-1 PARCEL 1 AP04 ^ (bbfso) 17 5 = 435100 Z GZ= .5q x� 5 x. ►Z = 042 c -s • IZ A< • CGGeS Td 1IJl,ET PA'RcI_>, 2. AU:A 15 4<. A RE; 4 2 x 85 x5593560 Q� = .154 53 c is ,3`9 c�rs- -a (TI 0 P n a a � D Zi � Z A � � L IA �{ o � G � rn A � a R� liY � U1 C X WTT • cT W n W O D k� cll _n G� III err 111 W uAM -v D A 7° pi c� ,J 4 a N b W ul Ul F5 M* r •N- W v e4 r v � C5 0 (> ° r a a � D Zi � Z A � � L IA �{ o � G � rn A � a R� liY � U1 C X WTT • cT W n W O D k� cll _n G� III err 111 W uAM -v D A 7° pi c� ,J 4 a N b W ul Ul San Diego County Ilydrology Manual Dole: June 2013 Undisturbed Natural Terrain ('Natural) Low Density Residential (LDR) Low Density Residential (LDR) Low Density Residential (LDR) Medium Density Residential (MDR) Medium Density Residential (MDR) Medium Density Residential (MDR) Medium Density Residential (MDR) I ligh Density Residential (11DR) I ligh Density Residential (IIDR) Commercial /Industrial (N. Cont) Commercial/Industrial (G. Com) Commercial/Industrial (O.P. Com) Commercial /Industrial (Limited L) Table 3 -1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR URBAN AREAS Permanent Open Space Residential, 1.0 DU /A or less Residential, 2.0 DU /A or less Residential, 2.9 DU /A or less Residential, 4.3 DU /A or less Residential, 7.3 DU /A or less Residential, 10.9 DU /A or less Residential, 14.5 DU /A or less Residential, 24.0 DU /A or less Residential, 43.0 DU /A or less Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional /Commercial Limited Industrial Section: 3 Page: 6 of 26 Runoff Coefficient "C" Soil 0" 0.20 0.25 0.30 10 0 ?7 0.32 0.36 20 0.34 0.38 0.42 25 0.38 0.41 0.45 3 -i' 0.41 0.45 0.48 4 0.48 0.51 0.54 45 0.52 0.54 0.57 50 0.55 0.58 0.60 65 0.66 0.67 0.69 80 0.76 0.77 0.711 80 0.76 0.77 0.78 85 0.80 0.80 0.81 90 0.83 0.84 0.84 90 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.35 0.41 (1.46 0.49 0.5ir 59 0.57 0.60 0.63 0.71 0.79 0.79 0.82 0.85 0.85 0.87 'The values associated with 0% impervious may be used for direct calculation of the runoff coefficient as described in Section 3.1.2 (representing the pervious runoff coefficient, Cp, for the soil type), or for areas that will remain undisturbed in perpetuity. Justification must be given that the area will remain natural forever (e.g., the wea is located in Cleveland National Forest). DU /A - dwelling units per acre NRCS m National Resources Conservation Service FQ V t ,I '1 1' III. t' I! � I ,� Itli 1 is ICI 1'�li t Il�r III C.c►unlyul San l)ic9 II III Ii tl I Hydrology Manual III ' I IC(Fllll i�r , � I N r r F I� I Itlb(r ll. l`urnd/ r I � �I 1 I II' � �I��ri'I •:� Ii�.II I I ; , i I � } ( J_., al •. , ' , , r f r � Ku,n �,!! l,n rl,n inl, � • • 1 i I I I I II y' '{ I ta,� ^ f t ( I• IOU IearRalnfolllSvenl- 2Jllaan ,, , I1 t Ij.�l I a I II: � ,�x'�•. .' =�1'6 �I , al I l F ,. 1 I.. I �•II t I i.', I� °� '1 { 1 I � i , i �• C rf 1 { I IV � ' .. r , 1 b • � . I I : I � � � I � � I pF ��1r � I I I �r I � I � � � � � �`� � ap i 13r!4�;I; a 4, , 'cis GIs �jl l I III III i � � � I I Ft `� �I'' I,.. 1 }tP f{ 1.It r I r l jy 'i. _, r I 14'1•• I. t�l t I I N .. ,.... ...... r....r..r � i i� � i j, ; I I I „, >,�. j �},: :}.1111 I I, � � I TW:•.. =�.._ I ;fN� , IRI i.� —� - _ Ni a213 .- .': ::.-•:.- 0 Mlles it III It, I 'I'',w III '.b I 'i jQ� 6 41 I l I 1 ' I• � b. i �III� I Ili -13N� V . II Coun}�� of San Diego II. I I II Hydrology Manual •' I I 1 ,- — Po III, I I:.. 'n_' � � �? �• I .LI' � I I I 3i�I'., I• I i ' ;. ��:; I .7.1 '. Rainffilllsopluvialr - I I � Ii I , '' ' - j� •• I s l , r t 3r Q , ' ;• ...1 l I I ,qx ' '• 1�','�li�' `ll I •• I I 1011 Year Italnfall F.venl_611onn -- -..... Is�NJ IMtJrsl � r �I y I �.,I I I ?, - � - .1 I '� i .1 :. -I IIIII I �l ! I___ � I • '1 �'f � I I ; , � ' � 1.�• I I � i , _J � n� ! ��! I i I __ � hx/x•MXS ^ I I , � I :. 1 Ctl ; l,� ' I I I I I l I � l I' � 't I 1 f, j I 1 Y �• � -}•- l l} T 1 •Fv 1 I� Y ' j V I I ii i l rt I•,. �. � -�� 11 � I I { ",•:j ',, � I IiS� � I rt� _1 - -I'• J I 1 �J•••.�• -:' I I I Ir � i � l i l I ' ' I , .I. , l �• ! . I _.,.. GIS ,Iag�GIS I il. II i � � III ��x II'fl I 1'. 11... �.n 14e•.<.....d' I II I1 ,! I 2r y ' •n f . I ri t I I� �; _ F�- �"1 II �III'I III i�lli. :Ifs I I I .,.•........,... ..._. -. I I� , 3 s 0 3 Mlles li�i�;rl�,,��1 l l:l� Irli ►�I� IiI I� t,�illf�i��ii. -13N� V . 10.0 D-0 BA 7.0 8 ec s0 40 3c 0 0.1 6 8 7 6 9 10 15 20 30 40 50 Minutes Duration 5 mill EQUATION I = 7.44 P6 D -0.645 I = Intensity (in/hr) P6 = 6 -Hour Precipitation (in) O = Duration (min) P c on a. 5.5 50 4.5 = 4.0 355 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Hours Intenslly- Duration Design Chart- Template Directions for Application: (1) From precipitation maps determine 5 hr and 24 hr amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are included In the County Hydrology Manual (t0, 50, and 100 yr maps Included In the Design and Procedure Manual). (2) Adjust 6 hr precipitation (if necessary) so [hat It is within the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr precipitation (not applicaple to Desert). (3) Plot 6 hr precipitation on the light side of the chart. (4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lilies. (5) This line 19 the Intensity - duration curve for the location bet- : %,zed. Application Form: (a) Selected frequency � year �,J j (b) P6 = 2.5 in., P24 = 4'.L ,� = 60 %(21 (c) Adjusted P6 (2)= Z-5 in. i (d) lx = `J min, (e) I = G-5 in./hr. Nola: This chart replaces the Intensity - Duration- Frequency curves used since 1965. P6 p1610ar1 1 I 13 2 .13 I I I I 3 �8.3 l l l l- If ��4.6 5 I i � 1 S.5 I 8 1 - -9 263 13.95 6,27 6.59 7.91) 9.22 10.51 11.86:13.17 14.49 15.81 7 212 318 424!630,836 7A2 818 9.51110.80 11.08 12.72 10 1.68 2 S3 39714 21 5.05 5.90 6.74 17.50 1 &42 9.27 10.11 15 1.30 1,95 259 324 3.e9 4.64 519 5.94 649 7.17 7.79 20 1.08 162 2.15 2.89 323 3.77. 4 31 4,65 1 5.39 5.93 101.48 25 0.93 140 1.117 2.33 Ze0 3.27 3.73 4.20 467 5.13 560 6A3 124 1.9E 2071249 290 332 3.b 4.15 456 498 _30 40 0.69 1.03 1.30 1.72 2.07'2.41 2.76 310. 3A5 379 4.13 60 D60 0.90 1.19 1.49 1.79 2.09 2.39 2.69 2.98 3.28 3.58 60 0.53 0801.08 11,3 1.59 1.88 212 2.39 2.r6 2.92 3.18 90 0.41 0.61 0.82 1.02 1.23 113 1. 3 1.84 2.04 22S 2.45 120 0.34 0.51 0.68 i 0.65 1.02 1.19 1.36 1.53 1.70 1.67 2.04 160 0.29 0.44 0.69 0.73 068 1.03 1 111 1.32 1 " 1.62 10.70 180 0.26 0.22 039 0,33 0.52 0.19 065 054 0 78 06S 0.91 0.76 104 O.B7 1,18 0.98 1.31 1.08 1.44 1.10 1.67 1.30 r-2401 --:L-3001 0,19 028 3.78 017 0.50 0.00 0Y5 0.85 094 1.03 9.13 360 a 015 0.33 0.11 0.50 0.58 0.67 1 0., 0.04 , 0.9'1 1 1.00 F�7_1 3- - N87' 59' 17" W 1 a7. 92' I SE( /I'AT _ - -- N II7*59'17" W 177.09' � I TO 77.730 ' ` _�z .. _ ill �- v (0\ moo- u-- __I ,90 5' PR IYAIE= c-� 00.16' f 1 0 �I �• - EASEM NT - -_�� - - _ 7-- 3�E;', j so / PRIVATE DRAINAGE +199 1 . �1 ` ) IN q EASEMENT =� 0 1 —� so I PARCL'�d s,�l y o PARCI& 1 4¢ 1 8315.3 S.F. GRV 8 89.1 S. ?OS 25' I' 7232.1 S.T. NE' °�25' 11 25' — 7177.3 F. 14 I PAL = 199.2 Sa' 1/ N - EX fW . SB PAD =199. m `O I REMOVE E ISTING ( ( c? S r' / PR 0 El I3G" � +STRUCTYRES 111 0 EUC i ( —, ACCESS I R ESMT. PARCEL 19 1 I 3 TO 2 }� p• 9B.11 I G( 65.00' 5 SB Mn .�� or ry 'n7 .s \ '� g• ry�194.4 ory B RF4, °III a� REM E EUC /i `. �, r ' Ft 195 FAG / Lo � TREES ' PA L 2 w1z4n.3 S. Boss ti / ., 11412.3 S.1' . T 5 r ck y / / �ro •� Y / \ �\ I 0. T( i lr 0 v', / 205.0 206'r Q11 REM 76 N i . TREE VE .14'0 ','r +' a.ox r,� / / pN PARCEL 7 \ 7330.8 S.F- CROSS \ �� i . 8 208.0 2t0 1 • 6920.5 S.F. NET ry 0 4 —210 9 IPA D =2 0 210.0 -- VA�jr — �° EXISTING 19723�� R/W LINE 36 "0 EUC 16' 4' TO REM IN N m �R. 212.0 2 - DVWY :` I I NEW BEGIN A.C. A.C. DIKE N07E: STRIPING Al \ LD 60.7 25 DEIERMINEU _N 9 / 1'50:12" 'VA I �, - ELOCAT H: l'R =20.00 / PP TO REMAIN — OHL — OHL v 0 Gv RAMP G' 13.8 1-14.0 67 �OHL r- - cCURB IdH O—' q 1 d _, _ /O M" REMAIN J� MIIG o `REMAIN Inc BI WESTLAKE STREET " 4 — UE Z A S T R E E fi� J SEWER 3 OFL 194.7 �'� \ MH ILNEDMARK C O N S U L T I N G Planning Engineering Surveying April 16, 2012 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Engineer's Pad Certification For Project No.: Parcels 1, 3 & 4 of PM 20897 and Grading Permit No.: 10433 -G Pursuant to Section 23.24.3 10 of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad certification Letter for Parcels 1, 3 & 4 of PM 20897. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading for these lots has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and the requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. 23.24.310(B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Parcel No.: Pad elevation per Plan: 211.0 199.5 199.2 Pad Elevation ner Field Measurement: 210.9 199.5 199.2 23.24.310(B)1. Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices and/or retaining walls have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.310(B)5. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. 23.24.310(B)6. The construction of earthen berms and positive building and pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Thanks. Sincerely, Ogliku °°'ON�� BRFIC ell LANDMARK CONSULTING C 48153 a EXP 630 -2012 + y _ Irr clvll �!Ill Mark A. Brencick, PE, PLS OFCµW President e 9555 Genesee Avenue, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121, Ph: (858) 587 -8070 e Date. Y' /V ')l City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Re Tract: 0 � - W6 Drawing Number:_ICg33- 6? lo-/333--17 Project Name 6&0 01^716� S New Engineer of Work In accordance with Section 23.24 -360 of the Encinitas/ Municipal Code, please be advised that in reference to the above stated plans, l�A�nft l/DhSa%. P� (Engineering firm), R,4,k ,1, as new Engineer of Work, assumes all responsibility and liability for the drawings, and the items as outlined on Declaration of Responsible Charge as shown on plans /oy 33- 6, / 0'/3? I En meering Firm Name �p AlAk 4 l3•��ti��, y�. Name / Title GCO✓/ g: Debra/release-responsibility atsa � .. ` . -.... C!N .... ^ (Seal) I Sea Bright Scpiember 29, 2011 City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Fncitutas. CA 92024 Re: Engineering Project No: 104331 and 104330 Owner Names: Harold Baku, Andrew Cady, Nit7a I.cichtling Site Address: 680 Wesilakc Street �q4 -f q1s /it In accordance with Section 23.24-160 of the City of Encinitas Municipal Cote, please be ad%is"I that The Sea Rright Company releases atl profe%sional responsibility and liability for the above referenced pruiect and for the items outlined in the Declaration of Responsible Charge as %tk)%vn on the plans. Sincerely. Robert O. Suku P RCF.'M1G2 The Sca Bright Company' �v.3ja' n7_ bakreleasa F':y^�tw f&fWQOr*Itl:[ Drw*)rk ,f G322 Sea Bright Place; Gaftba0 CA 92001 - re}ephone ;FAX 700.720 -0095 flu; March 28, 2011 (Revised October 3, 2011) James R. Brennan Westlake Homes, LLC 27450 Ynez Road #228 Temecula, CA 92591 Re: Permit issuance requirements for: Application 10433 -G and I Case no. 07 -164 TPM /CDP 680 Westlake Street 258- 121 -11 This letter summarizes the requirements for pulling your Engineering Permit for drawing 10433 -G and I. Your approved plan will remain valid for six months. If the permit is not issued within six months from the date of approval of the drawings, the plans will be subject to review by City staff for compliance with current codes and regulations before a permit can be issued, and changes to the approved plans as well as additional fees may be required. Additionally, work covered by an Engineering permit shall commence within 90 days of the permit issuance or the permit shall become invalid. Engineering permits expire following 90 days of inactivity on the work covered by the permit. Please read through this letter carefully and contact the City with any questions you may have. It contains information about many requirements that may apply to your project and can make the process clearer and easier for you. In order to obtain the permits to construct the work shown on your approved plans, you will need to satisfy the requirements below. All of the items listed below must be submitted to the Engineering front counter in one complete package at the time the applicant comes in to pull the permit. Partial submittals of an kind will not be accepted. Your project planchecker will not accept any of the documents listed on behalf of the Engineering front counter staff; all items must be submitted to the front counter directly together and at one time. The correct number of each of the requested documents must be provided; copies of documents submitted to the City during plancheck do not reduce the necessary quantities listed below. (1) Provide 4 print sets of the approved drawing 10433 -G and I Provide 2 copies of soils report "Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Four Parcel Residential Subdivision, 680 Westlake Street, Encinitas. California" prepared by Martin R. Owen, Geotechnical Engineer and dated November 12, 2009 (Project No. 091027). Submit 2 copies of the approved, signed (not draft) Resolution of Approval or Notice of Decision for Planning Case # 07 -164 TPM /CDP to be routed by the City to inspector and file. Pay additional plancheck fees in the amount indicated in the fee table below Pay NPDES plancheck fees in the amount indicated in the fee table below. (2) Post Security Deposits to guarantee all of the work shown on your approved drawings. The amounts of security deposits are determined directly from the Approved Engineer's Cost Estimate generated by your engineer according to a set of predetermined unit prices for each kind of work shown on your plans. You will be required to post security deposit(s) as follows: (a) Security Deposit for Grading Permit 10433 -G: in the amount $109.288.00 to guarantee both performance and labor/ materials for earthwork, drainage, private improvements, and erosion control. (b) Security Deposit for Improvement Permit 10433 -I: in the amount $52,520.00 to guarantee the performance and labor/ materials for the improvements shown on the approved improvement plan. (c) Security Deposit for Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities: N/A (d) Security Deposit for Deferred Monumentation: in the amount of $2,063.00 to guarantee the setting of the monuments for your project. The amount of the security deposit is based directly upon the Monumentation Cost Estimate provided by your project engineer. A minimum of 20% and up to 100% of the amount listed in item(s) 2(a) must be in the form of cash, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Up to 80% of the amount listed in item 2(a) may be in the form of auto - renewing Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Up to 100% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(b), 2(c), and /or 2(d) may be in the form of auto - renewing Labor and Materials bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company. Cash, certificates of deposit, letters of credit, and assignments of account are also acceptable financial instruments. If a certificate of deposit (CD) will be obtained to secure the entire amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a) and /or 2(b), two separate CD's for 25% and 75% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a) and /or 2(b) should be obtained in order to facilitate any future partial release of those securities. CD's posted may be of any term but must be auto - renewing and must specify the City of Encinitas as a certificate holder and include a clause that until the City of Encinitas provides a written request for release of the CD, the balance shall be available to the City upon its sole request. The format of any financial instrument is subject to City approval, may be in the owner's name only, and must list the City of Encinitas as a Certificate Holder. For any questions regarding how to post securities bonding, or the required format of securities please contact Debra Geishart at 760- 633 -2779. (3) Pay non - refundable fees as listed below: Fee Type Amount Grading Inspection $5,278.00 y Improvement Inspection $2,626.00 NPDES Inspection (Grading) $1,055.00 NPDES Inspection Improve_m_ ent) $525.00 Flood Control $1,031.00 Additional Plancheck Fees Due NIA NPDES Plancheck Fees Due N/A GIS Mapping Fee (Maps/ PM's only) $375.00 The grading and improvement inspection fees are calculated based on 5% of first $100,000.00 of the approved Engineer's cost estimate dated March 28, 2011 and 3% of the cost estimate over $100,000.00. The NPDES inspection fee is assessed as 1 % of the first $100,000.00 of the approved Engineer's cost estimate and 0.6% of the cost estimate over $100,000.00. The flood control fee is assessed at a rate of $0.21 per square foot of net new impervious surface area for driveway and parking areas as created per the approved plan. (4) Provide the name, address, telephone number, state license number, and license type of the construction contractor. The construction of any improvements within the public right -of -way or public easements is restricted to qualified contractors possessing the required state license as listed in the table below. The contractor must also have on file with the City current evidence of one million dollar liability insurance listing the City of Encinitas as co- insured. Additional requirements are described in the handout 'Requirements for Proof of Insurance" available at the Engineering front counter. Type Description Work to be Done A General Engineering any & all C -8 Concrete apron/curb/gutter/ramp/sidewalk C -10 Electrical lighting/signals C -12 Grading & Paving any surface, certain drain - basins /channels C -27 Landscaping planting /irrigationlfencing & other amenities C -29 Masonry retaining walls C -32 Parking &Highway Improvement signagelstriping /safety C -34 Pipeline sanitary sewer /storm drain (5) Permits are valid for no more than one year from the date of issuance and may expire earlier due to expirations of letter of credit and /or insurance policies. (6) This project does not propose land disturbance in excess of one acre and is exempt from the State Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) requirement. An erosion control plan shall be implemented per the approved grading plan. Preconstruction Meeting: A preconstruction meeting at the project site is mandatory for all projects. The preconstruction meeting may not be scheduled until the Engineering permit(s) have been issued, and the applicant/contractor must give the assigned Engineering inspector a minimum of 48 hours advance notice prior to the scheduled meeting time. Right -of -Way Construction Permit: A separate right -of -way construction permit will be required for any work in the public right -of -way or public easements. Typically, this work may include construction or reconstruction of a portion of the driveway within the public right -of -way, excavation, backfill, and resurfacing to install electric, gas, telephone, and cable television lines, or water and sewer connections. A permit fee of $300.00 per application and a site plan, preferably the work order issued by the public utility, will be required. Contractor license and insurance requirements apply. Permits must be issued at least 48 hours in advance of the start of work. Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits: These separate permits may be required for your project and are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division. A fee of $250.00 is required for traffic control plans. For more details, contact Raymond Guarnes, Engineering Technician, at (760) 633 -2704. Release of Project Securities: The partial or complete release of proiect securities is initiated automatically by the Citv after submission of satisfactory as -built drawings to the City and approval by the Droiect Enaineerina inspector. Applicant requests cannot be addressed without release approval from the project inspector. The processing and release of securities may take up to 4 weeks after the release process is initiated by the project Engineering inspector. Any cash releases will be mailed to the address on this letter unless the City is otherwise notified, and all letters mailed to a financial institution will be copied to the owner listed hereon. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection certified by the project Engineering inspector is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposit assigned to any Grading Permit. A sum in the amount of 25 % of the securities posted for improvement permits will be held for a one -year warranty period, and a release is automatically initiated at the end of that warranty period. Construction Changes: Construction changes prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required for all changes to the approved plans. Requests for construction change approval should be submitted to the Engineering Services Department front counter as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees and security deposits. Construction change fees of $200.00 and $350.00 will be assessed for minor and major construction changes, respectively. Construction changes necessitating a new plan sheet will be assessed the per -sheet plancheck and NPDES plancheck fees in lieu of the construction change fee. Construction changes not previously approved and submitted as as -built drawings at the end of the construction process will be rejected and the securities release will be delayed. Change of Ownership: If a change of ownership occurs following approval of the drawing(s), the new owner will be required to submit to the City a construction change revising the title sheet of the plan to reflect the new ownership. The construction change shall be submitted to the Engineering front counter as redline mark -ups on two blueline prints of the approved drawing together with two copies of the grant deed or title report reflecting the new ownership. Construction change fees apply. The current owner will be required to post new securities to replace those held by the City under the name of the former owner, and the securities posted by the former owner will be released when the replacement securities have been received and approved by the City. Change of Engineer of Work: If a change in engineer of work occurs following the approval of the drawing(s), a construction change shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Department. Two copies of the forms for the assumption of responsibility by the new engineer and the release of responsibility by the former engineer shall be completed and submitted to the City. Construction change fees apply. As- builts: Project as -built drawings prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required prior to Final Grading acceptance by Engineering Services. Changes to the approved plans require a construction change to be submitted to the City prior to field implementation. Construction changes may not be submitted as as- builts at the end of the construction process. This letter does not change owner or successor -in- interest obligations. If there should be a substantial delay in the start of your project or a change of ownership, please contact the City to request an update. Should you have questions regarding the posting of securities, please contact Debra Geishart, who processes all Engineering securities, at (760) 633 -2779. Should you have any other questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2780 or visit the Engineering Counter at the Civic Center to speak with an Engineering Technician. Sincerely, Ruben Macabitas Assistant Civil Engineer cc Landmark Consulting (Mark Brancick) Debbie Geishart, Engineering Technician Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Masih Maher, Senior Civil Engineer permit/file Enc Application Requirements for Proof of Insurance Security Obligation Information � the Sea BriSht company March March 28, 2011 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Att: Engineering Department COST ESTIMATE — BAKER 4 LOT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT PLAN 680 WESTLAKE STREET 10433-1 07 -164 TPM /CDP, APN 258 - 121 - 11 6" Curb and Gutter 375 L.F. @ $20.00 = $7,500 Concrete Driveway 2 EA. @ 950 = 1,900 Sidewalk 1,635 S.F. @ 5.00 = 8,175 Saw Cut 375 L.F. @ 4.00 = 1,500 A.C. Pavement [4/6] 1,312 S.F. @ 2.30 = 3,018 6" A.C. Dike 113 L.F. @ 8.20 = 927 D -27 Outlet Pipes 5 EA. @ 500 = 2,500 Curb Return Ramp 1 EA. @ 2,200 = 2,200 Trench Repair 488 S.F. @ 4.00 = 1,952 Remove Stripes 309 L.F. @ 3.00 = 927 New Striping 587 L.F. @ .65 = 382 4" Sewer Lateral 3 EA. @ 1,335 = 4,005 1" Water Service & 1" Meter 3 EA. @ 2,478 = 7,434 Street Sign 1 EA. @ 250 = 250 Install New Fire Hydrant 1 EA. @ 5,075 = 5,075 Sub Total $47,745 10% C ' Total Bakrsi Engineering • Management • General Contracting Development 4322 Sea Bright Place Carlsbad, CA 92008 Telephone /FAX 760 - 720 -0098 4,775 $52,520 the Sea BriSht company March March 28, 2011 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Art: Engineering Department COST ESTIMATE — BAKER 4 LOT SUBDIVISION GRADING PLAN 680 WESTLAKE STREET 10433 - G 07 -164 TPM/CDP, APN 258 - 121 - 11 Earthwork 30 C.Y. @ $20.00 = $600 Import 1,000 C.Y. @ 28.00 = 28,000 Import 420 C.Y. @ 22.00 = 9,240 Overexcavation 890 C.Y. @ 11.50 = 10,235 4 "/6" PVC Drain 763 L.F. @ 20.00 = 15,260 12" Drain Boxes 14 EA. @ 75.00 = 1,050 A.C. [4 "/6 "] Driveway 2,115 S.F. @ 2.30 = 4,865 Gravity Retaining Wall 571 S.F. @ 22.00 = 12,562 Bio Filtration Swale 896 S.F. @ 5.00 = 4,480 Gravel Bags 160 EA. @ 1.10 = 176 Construction Entrances 1,504 S.F. @ 5.25 = 7,896 Silt Fence 402 L.F. @ 1.60 = 643 Slope Stabilization 4,230 S.F. @ .20 = 846 Headwall I EA. @ 500 — 500 No Parking Signs [Fire Lane] 3 EA. @ 250 — 750 8' Trunk Eucalyptus Trees 6 EA. @ 375 — 2,250 Sub Total 10% Contingency Total bakrgest $99,353 9,935 $109,288 No. CO 8 EXp.9�31 1 Engineering Management ontracting vefopment 4322 Sea Bright Place Carlsbad, CA 92008 - Telephone /FAX 760 - 720 -0098 �., Sea Bright company March March 24, 2010 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Att: Engineering Department COST ESTIMATE — BAKER 4 LOT SUBDIVISION MONUMENTATION 680 WESTLAKE STREET 10433 - G 07 -164 TPM /CDP, APN 258 - 121 - 11 Set Survey Monuments 15 EA. @ $125 Sub Total 10% Contingency Total No. CO 830 EXP. o1 31 bakrmnmest Engineering Management • General Contracting , Development 4322 Sea Bright Place , Carlsbad, CA 92008 Telephone /FAX 760 - 720 -0098 1,875 $1,875 188 $2,063 �•• the Sea Bright company March 28, 2011 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Att: Engineering Department COST ESTIMATE — BAKER 4 LOT SUBDIVISION GRADING PLAN 680 WESTLAKE STREET 10433 - G 07 -164 TPM/CDP, APN 258 - 121 - 11 Earthwork 30 C.Y. @ $20.00 = $600 Import 1,000 C.Y. @ 28.00 = 28,000 Import 420 C.Y. @ 22.00 = 9,240 Overexcavation 890 C.Y. @ 11.50 = 10,235 4 "/6" PVC Drain 763 L.F. @ 20.00 = 15,260 12" Drain Boxes 14 EA. @ 75.00 = 1,050 A.C. [4 "/6 "] Driveway 2,115 S.F. @ 2.30 = 4,865 Gravity Retaining Wall 571 S.F. @ 22.00 = 12,562 Bio Filtration Swale 896 S.F. @ 5.00 = 4,480 Gravel Bags 160 EA. @ 1.10 = 176 Construction Entrances 1,504 S.F. @ 5.25 = 7,896 Silt Fence 402 L.F. @ 1.60 = 643 Slope Stabilization 4,230 S.F. @ .20 = 846 Headwall 1 EA. @ 500 — 500 No Parking Signs [Fire Lane] 3 EA. @ 250 — 750 8' Trunk Eucalyptus Trees 6 EA. @ 375 — 2,250 Sub Total 10% Contingency Total bakrgest $99,353 9,935 $109,288 No. �.j131 1 Engineering . Management ontracting » D velopment 4322 Sea Bright Place • Carlsbad, CA 92008 . Telephone /FAX 760 - 720 -0098 he Sea Bright company March March 28, 2011 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Att: Engineering Department COST ESTIMATE — BAKER 4 LOT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT PLAN 680 WESTLAKE STREET 10433-1 07 -164 TPM/CDP, APN 258 - 121 - 11 6" Curb and Gutter 375 L.F. @ $20.00 = $7,500 Concrete Driveway 2 EA. @ 950 = 1,900 Sidewalk 1,635 S.F. @ 5.00 = 8,175 Saw Cut 375 L.F. @ 4.00 = 1,500 A.C. Pavement [4/6] 1,312 S.F. @ 2.30 = 3,018 6" A.C. Dike 113 L.F. @ 8.20 = 927 D -27 Outlet Pipes 5 EA. @ 500 = 2,500 Curb Return Ramp 1 EA. @ 2,200 = 2,200 Trench Repair 488 S.F. @ 4.00 = 1,952 Remove Stripes 309 L.F. @ 3.00 = 927 New Striping 587 L.F. @ .65 = 382 4" Sewer Lateral 3 EA. @ 1,335 = 4,005 1" Water Service & 1" Meter 3 EA. @ 2,478 = 7,434 Street Sign 1 EA. @ 250 = 250 Install New Fire Hydrant 1 EA. @ 5,075 = 5,075 Sub Total $47,745 10% Contingency - 4,775 S 0. )17-/ Total ----- ---------------------- --- - - - - -- ------- ---------- -- - - - -- $52,520 NO. CO2 �3j Bakrstest Nk OF C. h"01. r Engineering • Management • General Contracting - Development 4322 Sea Bright Place • Carlsbad, CA 92008 • Telephone /FAX 760 - 720 -0098 Lfl11DMflRl( CONSULTING July 17, 2012 CITY OF ENCINITAS Engineering Department 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: City of Encinitas, TPM 07 -164, PM No. 20897 To whom it may concern: This is to certify that the referenced subdivision has been monumented in accordance with Parcel Map No. 20897 and that Landmark Consulting has been paid for these services. Very truly yours, LANDMARK CONSULTING Mark A. Brencick, P.E., P.L.S. LS 7226, Expires: 12 -31 -12 W.O. No. 0174 -1 6550tAND &&' 96 Yi WIC A �,L U BRENCCK 9 tJ� Fxp 12-31.20`12 T \FOF CAI N' � • 9555 Genesee Avenue. Suite 200. San Diego, CA 92121. Ph: (858) 587 -8070 Fax (858) 587 -8750 LA NDMARK Letter of Transmittal TO: City of Encinitas DATE 505 S. Vulcan Street PROJECT: Encinitas, Ca 92024 PROJECT NO: 10433 -1 ATTN: Engineering JN: July 17, 2012 Westlake We are forwarding: [ ] By Messenger [ )(] By Mail [ ] For your Pick -up [ ] By Overnight No. Copies: Description: 1 Monumentation Certification Letter LMCD1 Comments: This material is forwarded for: [ ] Your files [ ] Checking [ ]Other By: David Yeh Cc: File [ ] Per Your Request [ ] Your Review 174 -1 [ x ] Approval 9555 Genesee Avenue, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92121 Phone: (858) 587 -8070 07 16'f Tf� ? I NOV 3 0 2012 L A---N-D--MARK � CITY OfENCINIASFS C O N S U L T I N Q PV1 "Ep'.r � Date: 11 -30 -2012 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Engineer's Final Grading Certification for Project No. 10433 -G, Grading Permit Number 10433 -G. The grading under permit number 10433 -G has been performed in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan or as shown on the attached 'As Graded plan. Final grading inspection has demonstrated that lot drainage conforms to the approved grading plan and that swales drain at a minimum of 1% to the street and/or an appropriate drainage system. All the Low Impact Development, Source Control and Treatment Control Best Management Practices as shown on the drawing and required by the Best management Practice Manual Part II were constructed and are operational, together with the required maintenance covenant(s). Engineer of Record (signed & sealed) If /7 %� Dated POFESSIO P 10 H. YFy�R� 2 w No. 62717 m Exp. 6-30-20 D sr CIVIL �P OF CF Verification by the Engineering Inspector of this fact is done by the Inspector's signature hereon and will take place only after the above is signed and stamped and will not relieve the Engineer of Record of the ultimate responsibility: Engineering Inspector: Dated: --------- - - - - -- The above information shall be on the Engineer of Record's letterhead and shall be signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record r. OChicago Title Company Builders Services Division 2365 Northside Drive, Suite 500, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521 -3400 Title Department: Chicago Title Company Attn: Tom Votel/Ken Cyr Email: votelt(ructt.com & ken.cvr(a)ctt.com Phone: (619) 521 -3553 & (619) 521 -3555 Fax: (619) 521 -3608 Order No.: 930016149 -U50 Customer: Harold Baker Attn: Harold Baker Email: hlbaker30cox.net Phone: (760) 436 -7946 Reference No.: 680 Westlake SECOND AMENDED PRELIMINARY REPORT Property Address: 680 Westlake Street Encinitas, CA Dated as of October 18. 2010 at 7:30 am In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Chicago Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusion from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that se forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowners Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Chicago Title Insurance Company Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions sd forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY Order No.: 930016149 -U50 SCHEDULE A The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: A Fee 2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: Harold L. Baker, Jr., Trustee of The Harold L, Baker, Jr. Trust dated September 13, 2004, an undivided 75% Interest and Andrew P, Cady and Nitza K. Leichtling as Trustees of the Leichtling Catty Family Trust Initially created February 4, 2010, an undivided 25% interest, as tenants in common. 3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of San Diego and is described in the Legal Description, attached hereto: END OF SCHEDULE A Order No.: 930016149 -U50 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 10 OF RANCHO REQUIZA, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 2133, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON OCTOBER 11, 1928. APN: 258 - 121 -11 END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Order No.: 930016149 -U50 SCHEDULE B At the date hereof, items to be considered and exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: Property tares, including any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2010 -2011 1" Installment: $2,812.79 Penalty: $281.27 (Due after December 10) 2nd Installment: $2,812.79 Penalty and Cost: $291.27 (Due after April 10) Code Area: 19077 Assessors Parcel Number: 258- 121 -11 2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 35 (commencing with Section 75) of the revenue and taxation code of the State of California 3. Intentionally omitted. 4. Intentionally omitted. 5. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in possession thereof. This office must be notified at least 7 business days prior to the scheduled closing in order to arrange for an inspection of the land, upon completion of this inspection you will be notified of the removal of specific coverage exceptions and/or additional exceptions to coverage. 6. Any rights of parties in possession of said land, based on any unrecorded lease, or leases. This Company will require a full copy of any unrecorded lease, together with all supplements, assignments, and amendments for review. END OF SCHEDULE B Order No.: 930016149 -U50 INFORMATIONAL NOTES Note No. 1: The policy of title insurance will include an arbitration provision. The Company or the insured may demand arbitration. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or other obligation. Please ask your escrow or title officer for a sample copy of the policy to be issued if you wish to review the arbitration provisions and any other provisions pertaining to your Title Insurance coverage. Note No. 2: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than the amount, if any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Note No. 3: If title is to be insured in the Trustee(s) of a Trust, (or if their act is to be insured), this Company will require a copy of the Trust Agreement including all exhibits listing real and personal property transferred into the Trust together with complete copies of any amendments or modifications thereto. The Company must also be furnished with a verification of all present Trustees stating that the copy being furnished is a true and correct copy of the entire Trust Agreement including all modifications or amendments; that the Trust is currently in full force and effect; and that it has not been revoked or terminated. GP ATTACHMENT ONE PRIVACY STATEMENT IMPORTANT INFORMATION: For those of you receiving this report by electronic delivery the Privacy Statement and Exclusions From Coverage are linked to this report. Please review this information by selecting the link. For those of you who are receiving a hard copy of this report, a copv of this information has been submitted for vour review. QChicago Title Company Builders Services Division 2365 Northside Drive, Suite 500, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521 -3400 PARCEL MAP GUARANTEE Order No: 930016149 -U50 Fee: $750.00 Dated as of: June 17, 2011 at 7:30 am Parcel Map No: t/c CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES The County of San Diego and any City within which said subdivision is located in a sum not exceeding $1,000.00 that, according to those public records which, under the recording law, impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the land included within the exterior boundary shown on the map of the above referenced subdivision, the only parties having any record title interest in said land whose signatures are necessary, under the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, on the certificates consenting to the recordation of said map and offering for dedication any streets, roads, avenues, and other easements offered for dedication by said map are set forth in Schedule A. Issuing Office: 2365 Northside Drive, Suite 500 San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521 -3400 (619) 521 -3605 Fax Authorized Signature CLTA Guarantee Form No. 23 Parcel Map Guarantee (10.26 -95) Page I CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY , IN M-1 President Secretary Order No.: 930016149-U50 SCHEDULE A The map hereinbefore referred to is a subdivision of: SEE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION The parties hereinbefore referred to are: OWNERS: Harold L. Baker, Jr., Trustee of The Harold L, Baker, Jr. Trust dated September 13, 2004, an undivided 75% Interest and Andrew P, Cady and Nitza K. Leichtling as Trustees of the Leichthng Cady Family Trust Initially created February 4, 2010, an undivided 25% interest, as tenants in common. TRUST DEED HOLDERS: None EASEMENT HOLDERS: None END OF SCHEDULE A CLTA Guarantee Fom No. 23 Pamel Map Guarantx (10 -26-95) Page 2 Order No.: 930016149 -U50 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 10 OF RANCHO REQUEZA, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 2133, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON OCTOBER 11, 1928. END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION CLTA Guarantee Form No. 23 Parcel Map Guarantx (10 -2695) Page 3 OChicago Title Company Builders Services Division 2365 Northside Drive, Suite 500, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521 -3400 Title Department: Customer: Chicago Title Company Harold Baker Attn: Tom Votel/Ken Cyr Attn: Harold Baker Email: votelt @ctt.com & ken.c3T@ctt.com Email: hlbaker3na.cox.net Phone: (619) 521 -3553 & (619) 521 -3555 Phone: (760) 436 -7946 Fax: (619) 521 -3608 Reference No.: 680 Westlake Order No.: 930016149 -U50 FOURTH AMENDED PRELIMINARY REPORT Property Address: 680 Westlake Street Encinitas, CA Dated as of June 17, 2011 at 7:30 am In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Chicago Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusion from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Chicago Title Insurance Company Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered U is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY CLTA Preliminary Report Form -Modified (11 -17 -06) Page I Order No.: 930016149 -U50 SCHEDULE A The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is: A Fee 2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: Harold L. Baker, Jr., Trustee of The Harold L, Baker, Jr. Trust dated September 13, 2004, an undivided 75% Interest and Andrew P, Cady and Nitza K, Leichtling as Trustees of the Leichtling Cady Family Trust Initially created February 4, 2010, an undivided 25% interest, as tenants in common. 3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of San Diego and is described in the Legal Description, attached hereto: END OF SCHEDULE A CLTA Preliminary Report Fmm -Modified (I1 -17 -06) Page 2 Order No.: 930016149 -U50 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 10 OF RANCHO REQUEZA, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 2133, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON OCTOBER 11, 1928. APN: 258- 121 -11 END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (I 1 -17 -06) Page 3 Order No.: 930016149 -U50 SCHEDULE B At the date hereof, items to be considered and exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: 1. Property taxes, including any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2011 - 2012 that are a lien not yet due. 2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) of the revenue and taxation code of the State of California 3. Intentionally omitted. 4. Intentionally omitted. 5. A document subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained. Entitled: Covenant Regarding Real Property: Tentative Parcel Map and Coastal Development Permit Recorded: April 5, 2011 as File No. 2011-0176487, Official Records Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. 6. A document subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained. Entitled: Covenant Regarding Real Property: Hold City Harmless for Drainage Recorded: April 5, 2011 as File No. 2011- 0176626, Official Records Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. 7. A document subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained. Entitled: Covenant Regarding Real Property: Private Improvements Required as Condition on Final Approval of Subdivision of Real Property Recorded: April 5, 2011 as File No. 2011-0176627, Official Records Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. 8. A document subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained. Entitled: Covenant Regarding Real Property: Public Improvements Required as Condition on Final Approval of Subdivision of Real Property Recorded: April 5, 2011 as File No. 2011 - 0176628, Official Records Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11 -17 -06) Page 4 Order No.: 930016149 -U50 SCHEDULE B (continued) 9. A document subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained. Entitled: Covenant Regarding Real Property: Future Park, Traffic and Flood Control Fees Recorded: April 5, 2011 as File No. 2011- 0176629, Official Records Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. 10. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in possession thereof. This office must be notified at least 7 business days prior to the scheduled closing in order to arrange for an inspection of the land; upon completion of this inspection you will be notified of the removal of specific coverage exceptions and/or additional exceptions to coverage. 11. Any rights of parties in possession of said land, based on any unrecorded lease, or leases. This Company will require a full copy of any unrecorded lease, together with all supplements, assignments, and amendments for review. END OF SCHEDULE B CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17 -06) Page 5 Order No.: 930016149 -U50 INFORMATIONAL NOTES Note No. 1: The policy of title insurance will include an arbitration provision. The Company or the insured may demand arbitration. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or other obligation. Please ask your escrow or title officer for a sample copy of the policy to be issued if you wish to review the arbitration provisions and any other provisions pertaining to your Title Insurance coverage. Note No. 2: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than the amount, if any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall he arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Note No. 3: If title is to be insured in the Trustee(s) of a Trust, (or if their act is to be insured), this Company will require a copy of the Trust Agreement including all exhibits listing real and personal property transferred into the Trust together with complete copies of any amendments or modifications thereto. The Company must also be furnished with a verification of all present Trustees stating that the copy being famished is a true and correct copy of the entire Trust Agreement including all modifications or amendments; that the Trust is currently in full force and effect; and that it has not been revoked or terminated. Note No. 4: Property taxes, including any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2010 -2011 1" Installment: $2,812.79 Penalty: $281.27 (Due after December 10) 2'd Installment: $2,812.79 Penalty and Cost: $291.27 (Due after April 10) Code Area: 19077 Assessors Parcel Number: 258 - 121 -11 GP CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11 -17 -06) Page 6 Order No.: 930016149 -U50 INFORMATIONAL NOTES (continued) ATTACHMENT ONE PRIVACY STATEMENT IMPORTANT INFORMATION: For those of you receivine this report by electronic delivery the Privacy Statement and Exclusions From Coverage are linked to this report. Please review this information by selecting the link. For those of you who are receiving a hard copy of this report, a copy of this information has been submitted for your review. CLTA Preliminary Report Forth - Modified (11 -17 -06) Page 7 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies' Privacy Statement July 1, 2001 We recognize and respect the privacy of today's consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and state privacy laws. We believe that making you aware of how we use your non -public personal information ('Personal Information "), and to whom it is disclosed, will form the basis for a relationship of trust between us and the public that we serve. This Privacy Statement provides that explanation. We reserve the right to change this Privacy Statement from time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws. In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: • From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative; • From your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates or others; • From our Internet web sites; • From the public records maintained by government entities that we wither obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates or others; and • From consumer or other reporting agencies Our Policies Regarding The Protection Of The Confidentiality And Security Of Your Personal Information We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access in connection with providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes. Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information We may share your Personal Information with our affiliates, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate settlement service providers. We may also disclose your Personal Information: to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested; to third -party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other functions on our behalf; and to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you may find of interest. In addition, we will disclose your Personal Information when your direct or give us permission, when we are required by law to do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. One of the important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public domain. Such documents may contain your Personal Information. Right To Access Your Personal Information And Ability To Correct Errors Or Request Change Or Deletion Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and, under certain circumstances, to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the right to request correction, amendment or deletion of your Personal Information. We reserve the right, where permitted by law, to charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs incurred in responding to such requests. All requests must be made in writing to the following address: Privacy Compliance Officer Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Drive Jacksonville, FL 32204 Multiple Products or Services: If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more that one privacy notice from us. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Privacy Stalemem (10 -21 -07) ATTACHMENT ONE AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are tat insured against loss, 3. Title Risks . costs, anomeys' fees, and expenses resulting from: that are created, allowed, or agreed a by you 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date - wless ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: they appeared in the public records • lard use improvements on the land • landdivuton • environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violatiom or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date. This exclusion does Out limit the zoning coverage described in Imam 12 and 13 ofCovemd Title Risks. that result in no loss to you • that first affect your title after the Policy Date - dds does rat limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your title. 5. lack of a right: • in any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A OR 2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless: in streets, alleys. or waterways that touch your land a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title the Policy Dote Risks. • the taking happened prior in the Policy Dale and is binding on you if you bought the land without knowing of tle taking In addition an the Exclusions you are not insured against loss, cars. atorneys' fees, and the expenses resulting from: 1. Any right, interests, or claims of panics in possession of the land not shown by the public records. 2. Any comments; or Item not shown by the public records. This does not limit the lien coverage in Item 8 ofCovemd Tide Risks 3. Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. This does Out limit the forced removal coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks. 4. Any water rights or claims or title to water in or under the land, whether or not shown by the public records. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following maters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, cost, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: I (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting. regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (it) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the ditremions or area of the land or any parcel of which the lard a or was a pan; or (iv) environmental protection or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except in the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the lard has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. by Any govemnenal police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of or defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the lard has been recorded in the public records at Dam of Policy. 2. Rights of croment domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, Item, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters : (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy, but known on the insured claimant and rot disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the neared claimant: (d) attaching or created subsequent to Dam of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would tat have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate m interest insured by this policy. 4. Urenforceabllity, of the lien of (he insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Dam of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which ire land is situated. 5. Invalidity or imenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim demo(, which antes out of the transaction evidenced by the tanned mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the tmumd the esmm of interest tenured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal barderuptny, state insolvency or similar cremlors'rights laws. SCHEDULE B, PART EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (arid the Company will not pay toss, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of. 1. Taxes or assessmens which am not shown as existing Item by the 1 Easements, Item or encumbrances, or claims thereof which are not records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on mat shown by the public records. property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency 4_ Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, which my result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such encroachments, or any other fats which a correct survey would proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. by the public records. 2. Any fact, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the 5. (a) is or i Ac mining claims; (b) nee thereof. or ewater rig m patens or in Acs authorizing the issuance thereof; ep water rights. public records but which could be ascermirred by an inspection of the chains or title a water, whether or not the matters excepted order (a). land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof (b) or (c) am shown by the public records. Attachment One (11- 17 -06) Page 9 ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10-17 -92) WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT -FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following rustlers are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attomeyi fees or expenses which stoic by reason of (a) (b) Any law, ordinance or governmental mguladon(including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances. or regulations) restricting. regulating. prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy. use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a pan; or (iv) environmental protection. or the effect of any violation of these: laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the lard has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding fmm coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant, (b) rot known m the Company, rat recorded in the public records at Bate of Policy, but known to the inured claimant and rot disclosed in writing to the Company by the immed claimant Pinar in the date the insured clairam became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss ordamage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the prionry of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or matenal or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforeeability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indcbmdness, in comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenfomeability of the Iien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which anus out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or maenals (or the claim of prionly of any statuary lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in pan by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the inured mortgage, which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim which apses out of the mansiscuon creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar crediloms'rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (ii) the subordination of the Interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine or equitable subordination; or (lit) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential Minster results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of oansfer, or (h) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions fmm Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real shown by the public records, property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, which ray result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would proceedings, whether or nol shown by the records of such agency or disclose, and which arc not shown by the public records, by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights. interests or .lairs which are not shown by the 5. (a) parents or nted mining claims; @) reservations or exceptions m patents r tl Acts ter, wil the t the issuance dereof, (c) water rights, public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the claims or title to water, whether or rot the ratters excepted wrier (a). land or which lay be asserted by persons in possession thereof (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (06 -17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following tatters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will Out pay lass or damage, costs, moneys' fees, or expenses that apse by reason of I. (a) Any law, ordinance, pemsit, or governmental regulation (including these relating to building and zoning) restricting. regulating, prohibiting, or mlating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dinensions, or location of any Improvement erected on the Land. (iii) the subdivision of land, or (iv) environmental protection or the effect of any violation of these laws. ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does rot modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. Attachm rat One (11 -17 -06) Page 10 (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion lb) does rot modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain This Exclusion does tot modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or g. b. Defects, lien, encumbrances, adverse claim, or other matters (a) created, suffered, rumored, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, rat recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and rot disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Ins ind Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent in Date of Policy (however, this does rot modify or limit the covetal provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14), or ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) (e) resulting in loss or damage that would we have been sustained if the Insured Maintain had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply wide applicable doing. business laws of the stare where the lard is situated. 5. Invalidity or ureffirmeability in whole or in pan of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth- in- lerding law. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, slate insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential minter for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of ma policy. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided miler Coveted Risk I I(b). The above policy form may be issued in afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include die following Exceptions from Coverage: -Si7a7 5121 W 0.9 9 :ZU a [KUL 31,7:[tl?1 This policy does tot insure against loss or damage (and the Company will we pay costs, attorneys' fees or expe.es) that arise by reason of L (a) Taxes or assesstrcnts that arc we shown as existing liens by the 3. Pammens, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof. not shown by records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on the Public Records. real property or by the Public Records; 4, Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse (b) Proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not accurate and complete land survey of the Land and we shown by the shown by the records ofsuch agency or by the Public Records, Public Records. 2. Any fats, rights, tmeress, or claims that are not shown by the Public 5. (a) Unpatented mining caimr (b) reservations or exceptions in Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the lard or patens or in Acs authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10- 17 -92) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following maters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, cosy, attorneys' fees orexpe.es which arise by reason of: 1. (a) (b) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and wrong laws, ordi.nces, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (it) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Urn has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of emi ant domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but tot excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters '. (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company. rot recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the Insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimam prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this pol cy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the "reaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason offer: operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency. or similar creditors' right Laws, that is based on: (i) On transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (ii) the transaction crewing the estale or inmrest roomed by Jua policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to inpan notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy form nay be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage Policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does trot insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, atti mays' fees orexpenses) which arise by reason of: 1, Taxes or assessments which arc tat shown as existing liens by the records ofany taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records, Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any fats, rights, interests or claims which are mat shown by the public records but which could he ascertained by an inspection of the and or which ray be asserted by persons in possession thereof Attachment One (11 -17 -06) Page 11 3. Easements, lie. or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other faces which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatened mining claims: (b) reservations or exceptions in patens or in Acs audnnzing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claim or title In water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (e) are shown by the public records. ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) 2006 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (06 -17 -06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees. or experees that anse by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, perow, or govemmennal regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement emcmd on the land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governments[ police power. This Exclusion lb) does not modify or limit the coverage provided wider Covered Risk 6, 2. Rights of eminent domain This Exclusion does not modify, or limit the coverage provided wrier Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other treaders (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Imured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would net have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value forthe Title. 4. Any claim by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, suite insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A. is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason net stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Tide for real estate taxes or assessmar s imposed by governmental authority and created or watching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or odor instrument of transfer in de Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The above policy farm may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does net insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assesaments on real the Public Records. property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such circumstance affecting the Title Out would be disclosed by an proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or accurate and complete land survey of the Land and that art not shown by the Public Records, by Or Public Records. 2. Any facts, nghs, interests, or claims that are not shown in the Public S. (a) Unpatemed reining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or patens or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights. that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Lard claim or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a). (b), or (c) arc shown by the Public Records. CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10 -22 -03) ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10 -22 -03) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You art net insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: I. Gove ,"rind police power, and the existence or violation of any law a. a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at or government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and the Policy Date; or regulations concerning: b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You a. building b. zoning c. Land use d. improvements on the Land e. Land division f. environmental protection This Exclusion does rot apply in violations or the enforcement of these matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. This Exclusion does mot limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14, 15, 16, 17 or 24. 2. 71e failure of Your existing structures, or any parr of them to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. 1 The right in take the Land by condemning it, unless: Attachment One (I 1 -17 -06) Page 12 if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed a by You, whether or not they appear in the Public Records; b. that arc Known to You at the Policy Date, but rat to Us, unless they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Dam - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title, 6. Lack of a right: a. many land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b, in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk I 1 or 18. ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your imurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owwr's Coverage Statement as follows: For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Our Maximum Dollar Yom Deductible Am. [ Limit of Liabiliry Covered Risk 14: LQTia of Policy Amount or S 2 500. QQ $10,000 QQ (whichever is less) Covered Risk 15: d,QQ°/ of Policy Amount or S) OQQ.44 $25,000, (whichever is less) Covered Risk 16: L44'i of Policy Amount or S 5.000. W 5 25-000.00 (whit ever is less) Covered Risk 18: LQQ %of Policy Amount or S 2.5W S (whichever is less) ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (10/13101) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage ofthis policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys fees or expenses which arise by reason of I. (a) (b) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Lard; (it) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the Land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or areas of the Land or any parcel of which the Lard is or was a pan; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that s notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public Records at Dare of Policy. This exclusion does of limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13. 14, and 16 of this policy. Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above. except m the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does net limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of tle exercise thereof leas been retarded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. but not excluding from coverage any eking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowkcige. 3. Defects. liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other masers. (a) conned. suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant. (b) not Known in the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Dam of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Imured Claimant became: an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting In no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; Attachment One (I 1- 17 -06) Page 13 (d) attaching or created subsequent to Dale of Policy (this paragraph does of limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 8, 16, 18, 19, 20.21. 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid valm for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Umnforeeability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness. to comply with applicable doing business laws of the slate in which the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or umnforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, except as provided in Covered Risk 27, or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Real property axes or assessments of any governmental authority which become a lien on the lard subsequent to Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 7, 8(e) and 26. 7. Any claim of invalidity, uenfmccability or lack of prionty of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to advances or modifications made after the Insured has Knowledge dot the vestee shown in Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8. 8. Lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to each and every advance made after bete of Policy, and all ourresm charged thereon, over liens. encumbrances and other matters affecting the title, the existence of which art Known to the Insured at (a) The tine of the advance: or (b) The time a modification is made to the terms of the Insured Mortgage which changes the rate of interest charged, if the tae of Interest is greater as a result of the modification than it would have been before the mex ilicalion This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided m Coveted Risk 8. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion thereof to have been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This exclusion does of apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at Date of Policy. (continued) You may be entitled to receive a $20.00 discount on escrow services if you purchased, sold or refinanced residential property in California between May 19, 1995 and November 1, 2002. If you had more than one qualifying transaction, you may be entitled to multiple discounts. If your previous transaction involved the same property that is the subject of your current transaction, you do not have to do anything; the Company will provide the discount, provided you are paying for escrow or title services in this transaction. If your previous transaction involved property different from the property that is subject of your current transaction, you must - prior to the close of the current transaction - inform the Company of the earlier transaction, provide the address of the property involved in the previous transaction, and the date or approximate date that the escrow closed to be eligible for the discount. Unless you inform the Company of the prior transaction on property that is not the subject of this transaction, the Company has no obligation to conduct an investigation to determine if you qualify for a discount. If you provide the Company information concerning a prior transaction, the Company is required to determine if you qualify for a discount which is subject to other terms and conditions. Attachn=t One (11 -17-06) Page 14 7� (continued) I � F ®IAA�AAA�AD�DOAA9AB898AAAAAABOG V — �a nraeooee0000noonnn000 2/ Dill e ee ®Bose ® ©® ®oa��% I � F a —USA, F/ y • ` y J ayy N � y •:1 Q 4 b ©�� ` wn- 11f St S!i Description: San Diego, CA Assessor Map 258.12 Selected Pages 1 Page 1 Order: MLM000 Comment. Attachment One (11 -17 -06) Page 15 m m IN Q)� m VU D N44 O� C i� 0 W 31 4 n i �14 a Q7 V — �a 2/ a —USA, F/ y • ` y J ayy N � y •:1 Q 4 b ©�� ` wn- 11f St S!i Description: San Diego, CA Assessor Map 258.12 Selected Pages 1 Page 1 Order: MLM000 Comment. Attachment One (11 -17 -06) Page 15 m m IN Q)� m VU D N44 O� C i� 0 W 31 4 n i �14