2008-949 G/ILine: 1 b 1.3 y 7
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
Fidelity National Title Company
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: .In
2299 -23;t Coast B }lvd., Inc.
..����yy�� u
�VJL��`'il �ft"r1Yli,
Mel Z; �02-q nL
C • `v �'7 �.
APN: 254- 325- 43/44/45
Escrow No: 03008520- 937 -SL2
OC 2007- 0711428
I�IIiI!!IIIIIIIIIIIIIRIII UIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11 ,11IIIIIX111III
NOV 08, 2007 3:30 PM
OFFICIAL RECORDS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE
GREGORY J. SMITH. COUNTY RECORDER
FEES -. 3777.50
OC: OC
PAGES: 2
� Llllli IIIII Nlil IIIII IIIII Ilil !IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIII
Spac
7207 GRANT DEED
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(S) DECLARE(S)
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS $3,767.50
0 computed on full value of property conveyed, OR
❑ computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale
❑ unincorporated area 0 City of Encinita AND
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Jed L. Staley, an unmarried man
hereby GRANT(S) to 229 -231 COAST BLVD., INC., A California Corporation
72SQ�hlad ��d lA01111(y ???foy TPONPIN111In -G)
the following described real property in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California:
COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS MARKED EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HERE.
Commonly known as: 1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue, Encinitas, CA 92024
Dated: July 9. 2007
Jeley
F CALIFORNL1
CO
COUNTY OF //]]uu a } SSC
On o-1 , befor me, ✓ W, V? - V �� Notary Public,
personally an eared _ f
personally known to me'(bf proved to me on the b sis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are
subscribed to the wit Wn instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized
capacity(ies), an at by his /her /their �ignature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
,
person(s) act executed the im tilumen .
WITNESS my hand ay jpffict4 s
i
Signature
'�71 VkV y , J r ,� '� FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP
(�(�fv% I�C�vv J SUZETTE LAU ;
rs T� 0 COMM. alsss3as
k-%P41. -4 Sty ?£fns+ - WOrJtY�1000•CALFORMA Q
SAN DIE00 COUNTY n
�S Ai G CCMtI. EXPIRES APRIL?7, 2010 i
order No. 07- 2951052
EXHIBIT "X#F!'� 7208
Parcel A
All Lots 9, 10 and 11 of Block 4 of South Coast Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of
San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of
the County Recorder of San Diego County, January 11, 1924.
Excepting therefrom the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lots 9 and 10 and the Southerly 60.00
feet of the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lot 1 1 thereof.
Parcel B:
Lot 10 in Block 4 of South Coast Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State
of California, according to Map thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, January 11, 1924.
Excepting therefrom that portion of Lot 10 shown in Parcel A in that certain Document
entitled Certificate of Compliance recorded January 19, 1978 as File No. 78- O2467Oof
Official Records.
Parcel C:
The Southerly 60.00 feet of the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lot 11 in Block 4 of South Coast
Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map
thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, January
11, 1924.
Assessor's Parcel No: 254 - 325 -43, 254 - 325 -45 and 254 - 325 -44
2 (Rev. 11/17/04)
0 CLTA Policy Coverage Standard of Title Insurance
d g y
Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
A STOCK COMPANY
POLICY 27- 01 -90- 972553
NUMBER
CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDMONSAND SNPULATIONS, FIDELITYNATIONAL
777L.E INSURANCE COMPANY a California corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of
Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance
stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of:
1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein;
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title;
3. Unmarketability of the title;
4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land;
and, in addition, as to an insured lender only:
S. The invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage upon the title;
6. The priority of any lien or encumbrance over the lien of the insured mortgage, said mortgage being
shown in Schedule B in the order of its priority;
The invalidity or unenforceability of any assignment of the insured mortgage, provided the
assignment is shown in Schedule B, or the failure of the assignment shown in Schedule B to vest
title to the insured mortgage in the named insured assignee free and clear of all liens.
The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title or the
lien of the insured mortgage, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FIDEUTYNA77ONAL T FILE INSURANCE COMPANYhas caused this Policy
to be signed and sealed by its duly authorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A.
4 K/dwx04
Countersigned: _
Authorized Signature
FORM 27 -01 -90
Reprinted (2/97)
California Land Title Association
Standard Coverage Policy From - 1990
Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
SEAL
?� .ATTEST Presidcm
clLy L • �/L�
Sec —rctary
it ina JIM
SCHEDULE A
Order Number: 07- 2951052 Policy No.: 27- 01- 901972553
Amount of Insurance: $ 3,425,000.00
Premium: $ 709.00
Date of Policy: November 8, 2007 at 03:30 p.m
1. Name of Insured:
229 -231 Coast Blvd., Inc.
2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is:
A Fee
3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in:
229 -231 Coast Blvd., Inc., a California corporation
4. The land referred to in this policy is situated in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State
of California, and is described as follows:
SEE EXHIBIT "ONE" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
THIS POLICY VALID ONLY IF SCHEDULE B IS ATTACHED
1
CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1990
EXHIBIT "ONE"
Parcel A:
Order No. 07- 2951052
Policy No. 27- 01- 901972553
All Lots 9, 10 and 11 of Block 4 of South Coast Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego,
State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego County, January 11, 1924.
Excepting therefrom the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lots 9 and 10 and the Southerly 60.00 feet of the
Westerly 145.00 feet of Lot 11 thereof.
Parcel B:
Lot 10 in Block 4 of South Coast Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of
California, according to Map thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, January 11, 1924.
Excepting therefrom that portion of Lot 10 shown in Parcel A in that certain Document entitled
Certificate of Compliance recorded January 19, 1978 as File No. 78- 024670 of Official Records.
Parcel C:
The Southerly 60.00 feet of the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lot 11 in Block 4 of South Coast Park, in the
City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1776, filed
in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, January 11, 1924.
Assessor's Parcel No: 254 - 325 -43, 254 - 325 -45 and 254 - 325 -44
2
CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1990
Order No. 07- 2951052
Policy No. 27-01-90/972553
SCHEDULER
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorney's fees
or expenses) which arise by reason of:
PART
All matters set forth in paragraphs 1 through 5 inclusive on the cover of this policy under the caption
Part I of Schedule B.
PART II
1. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with
taxes, for the fiscal year 2007 -2008, Assessor's Parcel Number 254- 325 -43.
Code Area Number:
1st Installment:
2nd Installment:
Land:
Improvements:
Exemption:
Personal Property:
19317
$8,045.37 Paid
$8,045.37 Open
$1,040,400.00
$387,600.00
$None
S
2. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with
taxes, for the fiscal year 2007.2008, Assessor's Parcel Number 254- 325 -44.
Code Area Number:
1st Installment:
2nd Installment:
Land:
Improvements:
Exemption:
Personal Property:
19084
$4,595.95 Paid
$4,595.95 Open
$816,000.00
$51,000.00
$None
5
3
CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1990
3
a
Order No. 07- 2951052
Policy No, 27 -01- 901972553
Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with
taxes, for the fiscal year 2007 -2008, Assessor's Parcel Number 254- 325 -45.
Code Area Number:
1 st Installment:
2nd Installment:
Land:
Improvements:
Exemption:
Personal Property:
19317
$3,678.22 Paid
$3,678.22 Open
$489,600.00
$122,400.00
$None
S
The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5
(Commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation code of the State of
California.
----,Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a
document;
Granted to: Pacific Bell, a California Corporation
Purpose: Public utilities
Recorded: June 26, 1985, Instrument No. 85- 228050, of Official Records
Affects: Parcel B
Reference is made to said document for full particulars.
6. A Document entitled "Resolution Annexing Territory to San Diego County Lighting
Maintenance District" recorded April 3, 1986 as File No. 86- 129046 of Official Records.
Affects: Parcels A, B and C
7. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other
obligations secured thereby
Amount: $2,000,000.00
Dated: October 24, 2007
Trustor: 229 -231 Coast Blvd., Inc., a California corporation
Trustee: Temecula Valley Bank
Beneficiary: Temecula Valley Bank
Loan No.: 58010195
Recorded: November 8, 2007, Instrument No. 2007-0711429, of Official
Records
END OF SCHEDULE B
4
CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1990
3
4.
C^
7
Order No. 07- 2951052
Policy No. 27- 01- 90/972553
Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with
taxes, for the fiscal year 2007 -2008, Assessor's Parcel Number 254 - 325 -45.
Code Area Number:
1st Installment:
2nd Installment:
Land:
Improvements:
Exemption:
Personal Property:
19317
$3,678.22 Paid
$3,678.22 Open
$489,600.00
$ 122,400.00
$None
S
The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5
(Commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation code of the State of
California.
�Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a
document;
Granted to: Pacific Bell, a California Corporation
Purpose: Public utilities
Recorded: June 26, 1985, Instrument No. 85- 228050, of Official Records
Affects: Parcel B
Reference is made to said document for full particulars.
\ A Document entitled "Resolution Annexing Territory to San Diego County Lighting
Maintenance District" recorded April 3, 1986 as File No. 86- 129046 of Official Records.
Affects: Parcels A, B and C
A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other
obligations secured thereby
Amount: $2,000,000.00
Dated: October 24, 2007
Trustor: 229 -231 Coast Blvd., Inc., a California corporation
Trustee: Temecula Valley Bank
Beneficiary: Temecula Valley Bank
Loan No.: 58010195
Recorded: November 8, 2007, Instrument No. 2007 - 0711429, of Official
Records
END OF SCHEDULE B
4
CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1990
;29s /os- z
nj
® 2
M n
O
la his plat Your bna ed t rbe mm
7Na plot b for your aid M �
(�1 to sbaata and parcels. WMb Mb plat b Glbrao to M W Rant. 2 ff
FM*Itty Nadoml Title Imuran asaumea m liability for
any 10" O fflnli by reaaan for reNanoo thereon. SHT 2
1 h HYGEIA
1
So
N
c
3
I-1\
25
IT I
N
U
Q
J
U
�
K
N
�
n
A
7
1
h
m
M
I
(C�j
-�
°
7
O
PORW
27
1.1
p�
.7
M
h
7
\
I�Z
`
BO
N. /5w/3Of W
v rs a ii w
Z
a 5. I
w
13
q PAR
a o M A 27. N
Nm PAR
,Aa'
tV
.
: B :. 3•
:aB:
n
V O
ti H
h
cf
n
6i
O
S
C
er41
we rs -ss ;n ^wr
♦
o
;W
;
�
0
V
4+
,
4
PM 12210
pp
ti
w�....:
r* .Q. %:
325
°
m
b
r
w
s.. .A0:...
o
�
N
2
�
^
►�i PAR.I 0'
a
I feel /I
2
2
:.....:......
:.........:
Dt
� _
- BLK.w
i
4
4i
m
al
I
v
r :., :, w{
7f
fG
N /J�430J`w
2
Of 97
1
do
,r./JW ' 40
+O
to
(J
:
s,s s3•r E' PMIf
18
17 I e
r
PAR 2"-
O 62
4 h
%
PM 12132
POR 12
11 10
9
8
49 o
a n
O 33
I
w
0.
�
aO
PAR.
®
rd i
PAR. l PAR.
w
�
2O
h
n
m
r
W
N q
w Y 4
m ♦
♦ fJotM+�
cJ
♦
GO !.
m
A- -a/
M
On
1
a
Z�Uwjt
PA R.1 y
0 2
r
0aow
V v
v +
PAR.3 ti
N
N
N
N
N
n
N
A a N M p
� �' /✓ /5 a43 �35w �R� \ la ul N
eo
h
HERMES
Bt. f9
x,s 43'o1w 79
PORW
27
7
\
I�Z
T
BO
N. /5w/3Of W
v rs a ii w
Z
a 5. I
w
13
q PAR
a o M A 27. N
Nm PAR
,Aa'
tV
.
: B :. 3•
:aB:
n
V O
ti H
'/3c9i+ f7.a2
sjP )R
22
er41
we rs -ss ;n ^wr
♦
.
;W
;
n
-: :. 31
:8i
32• a
... :...
a o.a]A;.
t;
4+
M
O ..
10
PM 12210
1 as PAR 26 ar
ti
w�....:
r* .Q. %:
325
°
23
-A
12 n
I d b �
w
s.. .A0:...
2,. I A:
�
N
2
�
: wr
►�i PAR.I 0'
14
I feel /I
2
2
:.....:......
:.........:
24
� _
- BLK.w
i
4
a
/sre/
d O
d 0
r :., :, w{
7f
fG
N /J�430J`w
2
Of 97
1
do
Bo Af
,r./JW ' 40
+O
to
00.03
sea/
s,s s3•r E' PMIf
18
17 I e
r
PAR 2"-
O 62
4 h
%
PM 12132
POR 12
11 10
9
8
49 o
a n
O 33
I
w
0.
�
aO
PAR.
®
rd i
PAR. l PAR.
w
�
2O
h
n
W
N q
PAR f
X W
w Y 4
m ♦
♦ fJotM+�
-.
cJ
♦
GO !.
Ba s,s
Ss•s�,rcb rtes '
4 Tr99
A- -a/
On
Z�Uwjt
PA R.1 y
0 2
r
0aow
V v
v +
PAR.3 ti
r
o
_
eo
se
Ve 41p
1 +o
1 Cl- so 120 1
00.01
PM12132
r ,,,
cs
•o :0
7M P.M I874 (
a so s
h
HERMES
lc /1JI GUVI 1G. 4C 01]4'JUOo DWlL 'QO.amo rma w
MT T BiIIL
t11
P.O. Box 1195
Lakesid4, Calitomis
92040
(619) 443-0060
Decernbcr14, 2007
Lori Robinson
K F. S.Tbens, Inc
1500 11 Avenue
Escondido, California 92029
SUBIB.CT: File No. 1147B4 -07
Update to PreliminAry Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Residential Building Site
1007 — 1021 Hermes Avenue
City of Encinitas
Dcar Ms. Robinson:
In acoordance with your tequest, this is to update the krdimnary Geotechrucal Investigation
dated October 3, 2005, by Coast Geotechril . Soil conditions appear to be the same as at the
time the Bfarementioned report was prepared RAO mmendatiow therein am sh71 considered
applicable for the proposed project. We have reviewed the previous report and agree with the
recommendations therein. We assume geotechnical responsibility for the preparation and
Placement of the 511 during grading per the previously referenced report and may be
considered the Soil Engineering Consultant of Record•
if we Mn be of any 5uther assistance, Please do not hesitate to Oontact our office. This
Opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated.
Respoctfully submitted,
oVP\QFCSSIc
MC.
No. 2t,ow
d C. tyth ItM 21650 a ora coops
m
�Wss °�� Crvtt.
cc: (3) submitted CF' CALW
( 1
_T'd :u: 28800b2091 SAN:WOW H0b:20 8002- II -NHf
COAST GrEOTECHNICAL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
December 21, 2005
Jed L. Staley
11062 d Street, Suite 120
Encinitas, CA 92024
Subject: PROPOSED POROUS PAVEMENT
Proposed Ten (10) Lot Subdivision
1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue
Encinitas, California
Dear Mr. Staley:
As per our discussion with Tory Walker, P.E., it is our understanding that porous paving is being
proposed for the street and driveways on the above referenced residential development. The intent
is to reduce surface runoff by allowing infiltration through the pavement section and into the
underlying soils.
The site is underlain by Pleistocene terrace deposits. The terrace deposits are typically composed
of fine and medium - grained sand with variable amounts of silt and clay. In general, the sediments
are pervious and suitable for infiltration. Infiltration rates will vary depending upon silt/clay content
and density of the Pleistocene sands.
Additional recommendations for the pavement design section will be necessary based on final design
concepts.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Sincerely,
COAST C
W 2109 (!�
� E>q�.5 -31-06 —�
CERTIFIED
Mark Burwell, C.E.G. 1r ENGINEERING
Engineering Geologist c9� dEtX001ST P
779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075
(858) 755 -8622 • FAX (858) 7559126
TORY R.WALKER ENGINEERING. INC.
WATER RESOURCES PLANNING & ENGINEERING
November 16, 2005
Mr. Jed L. Staley
11062 "d Street, Suite 120
Encinitas, CA 92024
MAY 15 2008
--J
Re: Storm Water Management at 1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue, Encinitas, California
(Tentative Map Case # 05 -169)
Dear Mr. Staley:
I have completed my review of the proposed ten -lot subdivision at 1007 -1021 Hermes
Avenue in the City of Encinitas. The purpose of this letter is to summarize my
recommendations for storm water management of the proposed project. You are proposing an
increase in density, which will also increase the impervious area over the existing condition.
The proposed increase in impervious area will result in a corresponding increase in runoff for
all storms. There are known flooding conditions downstream of the site, and there are no
storm drain facilities to adequately convey increases in runoff. To mitigate for any increase in
runoff, porous paving should be used. I understand that you will be proposing porous
concrete for the proposed project. Porous concrete surface areas function as if they are only
35- percent impervious. In addition, they reduce the runoff volume from impervious areas
draining to them, through the infiltration that occurs under the porous pavement.
Since the porous paving can be assumed to he 35- percent impervious, 65- percent of all porous
pavement on a project functions as pervious surfaces. Therefore, some of the additional
impervious surfaces proposed for this project can be replaced with porous concrete to offset
the increase, thus reducing runoff for all storms to below existing rates. The following
calculations demonstrate how this project will reduce runoff for all storms to existing
amounts.
The property area is 42,400 square feet (so. The total existing impervious area is 22,530 sf,
or 53- percent impervious, and the proposed impervious area, without porous pavement, will
be 30,040 sf, or 71- percent impervious. The proposed increase in impervious area is then
7,510 sf. This increase must therefore be mitigated by an amount of porous pavement that is
approximately one and one -half times the 7,510 sf. The actual calculated amount is
7,510/0.65, which is 11,550 sf. This will require the private road and portions of the
driveways to be constructed of porous pavement.
This area of porous pavement represents significantly more area than what is needed for
storing the water quality storm flows. The water quality volume can be approximated using
955 VALE TERRACE 0 RIVE, SUITE B. VISTA, CA 92094 PH: 760.414.9212 FX: 760.414.9277 1 WWW TRW ENGINEER I NG.COM
Mr. Jed Staley
Storm Water Management for Tentative Map Case # 05 -169
November 16, 2005
the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph (SBUH), commonly used for such applications. The
attached SBUH calculations estimate the runoff volume from an 85t1 percentile storm event to
be 770 cubic feet. Porous concrete typically contains 18 percent voids (porosity = 0.18). The
storage volume available in a 6 -inch thick section of porous concrete is then 0.09 feet per
square foot, so the storage volume available for this project is 1,040 cubic feet (11,550 sf x
0.09 ft) in the porous concrete alone.
In addition to this, the gravel base will have even more storage volume available, typically
having 40 percent voids (porosity = 0.40). The gravel base layer will typically have a
minimum depth of nine inches, so the minimtun storage volume in the gravel base will be
2,770 cubic feet (11,550 sf x 0.32 x 0.75 ft), assuming a conservative porosity value of 0.32,
instead of 0.40. Therefore, the minimum total available storage volume in the porous
concrete section, including the gravel base, is 3,800 cubic feet. This storage volume was
conservatively ignored for the calculations determining the amount of porous pavement
needed to offset the increase in impervious area.
These calculations shown above do not replace hydrologic calculations prepared by Sampo
Engineering, but rather supplement them, demonstrating that the proposed project will not
cause an increase in runoff over existing conditions. If you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
TORY R. WALKER ENGINEERING, INC.
Tory R. Walker, P.E.
President
1007 - 1021 HERMES AVENUE, ENCINITAS - Storm Water Quality Facility Sizing
RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH (SBUH METHOD - 6 -Hour Storrs Event)
Given. Area =
0.97
acres
Pt =
0.60
inches (Total rainfall for an 85th percentile - 24 hour storm event)
dt =
10.0
min.
(1)
Tc
10.0
min
(Developed site conditions)
% IMP =
53%
(6)
(9)
PERVIOUS Parcel
(11)
IMPERVIOUS Parcel
Area =
0.46
acres
Area = 0.52 acres
CN =
68
Incre-
CN = 98 (assuming dry antecedent moisture condition)
S =
4.71
Instant
S = 0.20
0.2S =
0.94
distri-
02S 0.04
Compute Developed Conditions Runoff hydrograph
Column (3) = Rainfall Distribution for San Diego County
Column (4) = Col. (3) x Pt = 85th percentile - 6 Hour Hyetograph at this location.
Column (5) = Accumulated Sum of Col. (4)
Column (6) = [If P <= 02S] = 0; use PERVIOUS Area "S" value. [If P > 0.2S] = (Col.(5) - 0.2S) ° /(Col.(5) + 0.85); use PERVIOUS Area "S` value.
Column (7) = Col.(6) of present time step - Col.(6) of previous time step
Column (8) = Same method as for Col.(6), except use the IMPERVIOUS Area "S" value.
Column (9) = Col.(8) of the present time step - Col, (8) of the previous time step.
Column (10) = ((PERVIOUS area / Total area) x Col.(7)) + ((IMPERVIOUS area / Total area) x Col.(9))
Column (11) = (60.5 x Col.(10) x Total Area) 110 (dt = 10 minutes); Routing Constant, w = dt l (2Tc + dt) = 0.3333
Column (12) = Col-(I 2) of previous hme step + (w x [Col. IT 1) of previous time step + Col. (11) of present time step - (2 x Col.(12) of previous time step)])
sauKwq 102 1111512005
Pervious Area
Impervious Area
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(6)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
Time
Time
Rainfall
Incre-
Accumu-
Accumu-
Incre-
Accumu-
Incre-
Total
Instant
design
Increment
distri-
mental
sled
laced
mental
laced
mental
Runoff
hydro-
hydro-
bution
Rainfall
Rainfall
Runoff
Runoff
Runoff
Runoff
graph
graph
min.
%of Pt
in.
in.
in.
in.
in.
in.
in
cfs
cis
1
10
0.0166
0.0100
0.0100
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.D0
0.00
2
20
0.0168
0.0100
0.0199
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
3
30
0.0166
0.0100
0.0299
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
4
40
0.0200
0.0120
0.0419
0,0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
5
50
0.0200
0.0120
0.0539
0.0000
0.0000
0.0008
0.0008
0.0004
0.00
0.00
6
60
0.0200
0.0120
0.0659
0.0000
0.0000
0.0027
0.0020
0.0010
0.01
0.00
7
70
0.0226
0.0136
0.0794
0.0000
0.0000
0.0061
0.0034
0.0016
0.01
0.01
6
8o
0.0228
0.0136
0.0930
0.0000
0.0000
0.0106
0.0045
0.0024
0.01
0.01
9
90
0.0228
0.0136
0.1066
0.0000
0.0000
D.0160
0.0054
0.0029
0.02
0.01
10
100
0.0334
0.0200
0.1266
0.0000
0.0000
0.0254
0.0094
0.0050
0.03
0.02
11
110
0.0334
0.0200
0.1466
0.0000
0.0000
0.0361
0.0107
0.0057
0.03
0.03
12
120
0.0334
0.0200
0.1687
0.0000
0.0000
0.0480
0.0119
0.0083
0.04
0.03
13
130
0.0778
0.0467
0.2133
0.0000
0.0000
0.0790
0.0310
0.0165
0.10
0.06
14
140
0.0778
0.0487
0.2800
0.0000
0.0000
0.1135
0.0345
0.0183
0.11
0.09
15
150
0.0778
0.0467
0.3067
0.0000
0.0000
0.1504
0.0369
0.0196
0.12
0.10 « <peak
16
160
0.0334
0.0200
0.3267
0.0000
0.0000
0.1668
0.0164
0,0087
0.05
0.09
17
170
0.0334
0.0200
0.3468
0.0000
0.0000
0.1835
0.0167
0.0089
0.05
0.06
18
180
0.0334
0.0200
0.3668
0.0000
0 -0000
0,2005
0.0170
0.0090
0.05
0.06
sauKwq 102 1111512005
1007 -1021 HERMES AVENUE, ENCINITAS - Storm Water Quality Facility Sizing
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
Time
Time
Rainfall
Incre-
Accumu-
Aocumu-
Inge-
Aaumu-
Inge-
Total
Instant
design
Increment
distri,
mental
lated
lated
mental
laced
mental
Runoff
hydro-
hydro-
bution
Rainfall
Rainfall
Runoff
Runoff
Runoff
Runoff
graph
graph
min.
% of Pt
in.
In.
in.
in
in.
in
in.
cis
cis
19
190
0.0316
0.0190
0.3858
0.0000
0.0000
0.2167
0.0162
0.0086
0.05
0.05
20
200
0.0316
0.0190
0.4047
0.0000
0.0000
0.2332
0.0164
0.0087
0.05
0.05
21
210
0.0316
0.0190
0.4237
0.0000
0.0000
0.2497
0.0166
0.0088
0.05
0.05
22
220
0.0234
0.0140
0.4377
0.0000
0.0000
0.2621
0.0124
0.0066
0.04
0.05
23
230
0.0234
0.0140
0.4518
0.0000
0.0000
0.2746
0.0125
0.0066
0.04
0.04
24
240
0.0233
0.0140
0.4657
0.0000
0.0000
0.2871
0.0125
0.0066
0.04
0.04
25
250
0.0213
0.0128
0.4785
0.0000
0.0000
0.2985
0.0115
0.0061
0.04
0.04
26
260
0.0213
0.0128
0.4913
0.0000
0.0000
0.3100
0.0115
0.0061
0.04
0.04
27
270
0.0213
0.0128
0.5041
0.0000
0.0000
0.3216
0.0116
0.0061
0.04
0.04
28
280
0.0175
0.0105
05146
0.0000
0.0000
0.3311
0.0095
0.0051
0.03
0.03
29
290
0.0175
0.0105
0.5251
0.0000
0.0000
0.3407
0.0096
0.0051
0.03
0.03
30
300
0.0175
0.0105
0.5356
0.0000
0.0000
0.3503
0.0096
0.0051
0.03
0.03
31
310
0.0183
0.0110
0.5486
0.0000
0.0000
0.3603
0.0101
0.0053
0.03
0.03
32
320
0.0183
0.0110
0.5575
0.0000
0.0000
0.3704
0.0101
0.0054
0.03
0.03
33
330
0.0183
0.0110
05685
0.0000
0.0000
0.3805
0.0101
0.0054
0.03
0.03
34
340
0.0175
0.0105
0.5790
0.0000
0.0000
0.3902
0.0097
0.0052
0.03
0.03
35
350
0.0175
0.0105
0.5895
0.0000
0.0000
0.4000
0.0097
0.0052
0.03
0.03
36
360
0.0175
0.0105
0.6000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4097
0.0097
0.0052
0.03
0.03
37
370
0.0000
0.0WO
0.6000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4097
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.02
38
380
0.0000
0.0000
0.6000
0.0000
0.0000
04097
0.0000
0.0000
000
0.01
39
390
0.0000
0.0000
06000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4097
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
40
400
0.0000
0.0000
0 6000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4097
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
41
410
0.0000
0.17000
0.6000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4097
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
42
420
0.0000
0.0000
0.6000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4097
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
43
430
0.0000
0.0000
0.8000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4097
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
44
440
0.0000
0.0000
0.6000
0.0o00
0.0000
0.4097
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
OAO
45
450
0.0000
0.0000
0.6000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4097
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
45
460
0.0000
0.0000
0.6000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4097
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
47
470
0.0000
0.0000
0.6000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4097
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
48
480
0.0000
0.0000
0.6000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4097
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
0.00
Time =
8.0
hours
Total
Volume of Runoff =
769 cu. ft.'
• (Found by summing this column
and multiplying by 600
600 is the conversion
0.02 ac-ft
required
to convert
SUM(Q) in
cfs to total volume in cubic
feet as follows:
V = SUM(Q) x di
(cu.ft.) = (cu.fUs) x (10 min.) x (60 simin.)
Peak Hour Rainfall Intensity = 0.200 iri
Total Flowrate of Runoff = 0.10 cfs
SBUH -6wq 2 of 2 1111 612005
i Sampo Engineering,Inc.
wA —E [,and Planning, Civil Engineering, Surveying, Mapping
f page 1 of 1
s CITY OF ENCINITAS j.n. 07 -125
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE May 8, 2008
FOR PRECISE GRADING
1007 -1021 HERMES AVE
ENCINITAS, CA
A PN: 254 - 325 - 43,44,45
DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST TOTAL
CLEAR AND GRUB
EXCAVATE AND FILL
EXCAVATE AND EXPORT (1 -1,000 CY)
EXCAVATE AND EXPORT (1,001- 20,000 CY)
Brow Ditch type B RSD D -75 PVT
Masonry Retaining wall C-4 PVT
12" Catch basin PVT by brooks DI 1212 with steel grate
4" PVC STORM DRAIN - PRIVATE
CURB FLUSH, 6 "X16" PVT
POROUS PCC PAVING 676" CL2 AB PVT RD, ALLEY
PCC DRIVEWAYS AND WALKS
TURFBLOCK
PCC CROSS GUTTER PER SDRSD G -12
2" AC OVERLAY
SAWCUT
Trench Resurfacing Per SDG -107 & 108
Silt Fence Caltrans SE -1
Gravel Bags
Stablized Const.Entrance Caltrans TC -1 type 2
42,388 SF
300 CY
1,000 CY
200
240 LF
2,600 SF
4 EA
20 LF
666 LF
7,648 SF
1,815 SF
2,140 SF
432 SF
4,510 SF
160 LF
16 LF
927 LF
120 EA
400 SF
$0.45
$20.00
$27.50
$22.00
$15.00
$29.65
$1,500.00
$20.00
$12 00
$6.00
$5.00
$1.70
$8.00
$0.45
$4.00
$25.00
$1.60
$1.10
$5.25
SUBTOTAL
lnoi CONTINGENCY
�L
$19,074.60
$6,00000
$27,500.00
$4,400.00
$3,600.00
$77,090.00
$6,000.00
$400.00
$7,99200
$45,888.00
$9.075.00
$3,638.00
$3,456.00
$2,029.50
$640.00
$400.00
$1,483.20
$132.00
$2,100.00
$220,898.30
$22,089.83
$242,988.13
MAY 1 5 2008
1034 SECOND STREET ENCINITAS, CA 92024 PHONE: (760) 436 -0660 FAX: (760) 436 -0659
info @sampoengineering.com
R415
May 17, 2010
Kevin Stephens, President
229 -231 Coast Blvd., Inc.
1500 West 11' "Avenue, Suite 24
Escondido, CA 92029
Re: Permit issuance requirements for:
Application 949 -G, 1
05 -169 CDP
1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue
254- 325 - 43,44,45
This letter summarizes the requirements for pulling your Engineering Permit for drawing 949 -G,I. Your
approved plan will remain valid for one year. If the permit is not issued within six months from the date of
approval of the drawings, the plans will be subject to review by City staff for compliance with current codes
and regulations before a permit can be issued, and changes to the approved plans as well as additional
fees may be required.
Please read through this letter carefully and contact the City with any questions you may have. It
contains information about many requirements that may apply to your project and can make the
process clearer and easier for you.
In order to obtain the permits to construct the work shown on your approved plans, you will need to satisfy
the requirements below. All of the items listed below must be submitted to the Engineering front counter
in one complete package at the time the applicant comes in to_oull the permit. , Partial submittals of any
kind will not be accepted, Your project planchecker will not accept any of the documents listed on of
of the Engineering front counter staff; all items must be submitted to the front counter directly together and
at one time. The correct number of each of the requested documents must be provided; copies of
documents submitted to the City during plancheck do not reduce the necessary quantities listed below.
(1) Provide 4 print sets of the approved drawing 949 -G.
Provide 4 print sets of the approved drawing 949 -I.
Provide 2 copies of soils report "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Ten Lot
Subdivision 1007 -1021 Hermes, Leucadia, California," prepared by Coast Geotechnical, dated
October 3, 2005; and Update Letter by Soils Tester, dated December 14, 2007.
Submit 2 copies of the approved, signed (not draft) Resolution of Approval or Notice of Decision
for Planning CaselNo. 05 -169 TPM /DRlCDP.
(2) Post Security Deposits to guarantee all of the work shown on your approved drawings. The
amounts of security deposits are determined directly from the Approved Engineer's Cost Estimate for
bonding purposes dated December 16, 2008 by your engineer according to a set of predetermined unit
prices for each kind of work shown on your plans. You will be required to post security deposit(s) as
follows:
(3)
(a) Security Deposit for Grading Permit 949 -G: in the amount $242.988.00 to guarantee both
performance and labor/ materials for earthwork, drainage, private improvements, and erosion
control.
(b) Security Deposit for Improvement Permit 949 -1 : in the amount of $65,691.00 to guarantee
both the performance and labor /materials for the improvements shown on the approved
improvement plan.
(c) Security Deposit for Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities: in the amount of $64.000.00
to guarantee the required undergrounding of overhead utilities for your project. The amount
of this deposit is based upon City of Encinitas current estimated undergrounding cost criteria
of $400.00 per linear foot. As an alternative to bonding in this amount, the applicant can
supply a receipt from SDGBE showing that this proposed undergrounding work has
been paid for in full..
(d) Security Deposit for Deferred Monumentation: in the amount of $3,500.0 0 to guarantee
the setting of the monuments for your project. The amount of the security deposit is based
directly upon the Mounumentation Cost Estimate provided by your project engineer.
A minimum of 20% and up to 100% of the amount listed in item(s) 2(a) must be in the form of
cash, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or an assignment of account. Up to 80% of the amount
listed in item 2(a) may be in the form of auto - renewing Performance and Labor and Materials
Bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company.
Up to 100% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(b), 2(c), and /or 2(d) may be in the form of auto -
renewing Labor and Materials bonds issued by a State of California licensed surety company.
Cash, certificates of deposit, letters of credit, and assignments of account are also acceptable
financial instruments.
If a certificate of deposit (CD) will be obtained to secure the entire amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a)
and /or 2(b), two separate CD's for 25% and 75% of the amount(s) listed in item(s) 2(a) and/or
2(b) should be obtained in order to facilitate any future partial release of those securities. CD's
posted may be of any term but must be auto - renewing and must specify the City of Encinitas as a
certificate holder and include a clause that until the City of Encinitas provides a written request for
release of the CD, the balance shall be available to the City upon its sole request.
The format of any financial instrument is subject to City approval, may be in the owner's name
only, and must list the City of Encinitas as a Certificate Holder.
For any questions regarding how to post securities, bonding, or the required format of securities,
please contact Debra Geishart at 760- 633 -2779.
Pay non - refundable fees as listed below:
Control I $381.00 _
NPDES Plancheck_Fees Due n/a _
GIS Ma PP in Fee Maps/ PM's only) �3 7— 00
The grading and improvement inspection fees are calculated based on 5% of first $100,000.00 of
the approved Engineer's cost estimate of December 16, 2008: and 3% of the cost estimate over
$100,000.00. The NPDES inspection fee is assessed as 1% of the first $100,000.00 of the
approved Engineer's cost estimate and 0.6% of the cost estimate over $100,000.00. The flood
control fee is assessed at a rate of $0.21 per square foot of net new impervious surface area for
driveway and parking areas as created per the approved plan.
(4) Provide the name, address, telephone number, state license number, and license type of the
construction contractor. The construction of any improvements within the public
right -of -way or public easements is restricted to qualified contractors possessing the
required state license as listed in the table below. The contractor must also have on file with
the City current evidence of one million dollar liability insurance listing the City of Encinitas as co-
insured. Additional requirements are described in the handout 'Requirements for Proof of
Insurance' available at the Engineering front counter.
Type
Description
Work to be Done
A
General Engineering
any & all
C -8
Concrete
apron/curb/gutter/ramp/sidewalk
C -10
Electrical
lighting/signals
C -12
Grading & Paving
any surface, certain drain -
basins /channels
C -27
Landscaping
planting/irrigation/fencing & other
amenities
C -29
Masonry
retaining walls
C -32
Parking &Highway
Improvement
signage /striping /safety
C -34
Pipeline
sanitary sewer /storm drain
(5) Permits are valid for no more than one year from the date of issuance and may expire earlier due
to expirations of letter of credit and/or insurance policies.
(G) This project does not propose land disturbance in excess of one acre and does not require from
the State, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). An erosion control plan shall be
implemented per the approved grading plan.
Preconstruction Meeting: A preconstruction meeting at the project site is mandatory for all projects.
The preconstruction meeting may not be scheduled until the Engineering permit(s) have been issued, and
the applicant/contractor must give the assigned Engineering inspector a minimum of 48 hours advance
notice prior to the scheduled meeting time.
Right -of -Way Construction Permit: A separate right -of -way construction permit will be required for any
work in the public right -of -way or public easements. Typically, this work may include construction or
reconstruction of a portion of the driveway within the public right -of -way, excavation, backfill, and
resurfacing to install electric, gas, telephone, and cable television lines, or water and sewer connections.
A permit fee of $300.00 per application and a site plan, preferably the work order issued by the public
utility, will be required. Contractor license and insurance requirements apply. Permits must be issued at
least 48 hours in advance of the start of work.
Haul Routes, Traffic Control Plans, and Transportation Permits: These separate permits may be
required for your project and are handled by the Traffic Engineering Division. A fee of $250.00 is required
for traffic control plans. For more details, contact Raymond Guarnes, Engineering Technician, at (760)
633 -2704.
Release of Project Securities: The partial or complete release of project securities is initialed
automatically-by the City after submission of satisfactory as -built drawings to the City and approval by the
project Engineering inspector. Applicant requests cannot be addressed without release approval from the
project inspector. The processing and release of securities may take up to 4 weeks after the release
process is initiated by the project Engineering inspector. Any cash releases will be mailed to the address
on this letter unless the City is otherwise notified, and all letters mailed to a financial institution will be
copied to the owner listed hereon. Satisfactory completion of Final Inspection certified by the project
Engineering inspector is a prerequisite to full release of the Security Deposit assigned to any Grading
Permit. A sum in the amount of 25% of the securities posted for improvement permits will be held for a
one -year warranty period, and a release is automatically initiated at the end of that warranty period.
Construction Changes: Construction changes prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required for all
changes to the approved plans. Requests for construction change approval should be submitted to the
Engineering Services Department front counter as redlined mark -ups on 2 blueline prints of the approved
Drawing. Changes are subject to approval prior to field implementation. Substantial increases in valuation
due to the proposed changes may be cause for assessment and collection of additional inspection fees
and security deposits. Construction change fees of $200.00 and $350.00 will be assessed for minor and
major construction changes, respectively. Construction changes necessitating a new plan sheet will be
assessed the per -sheet plancheck and NPDES plancheck fees in lieu of the construction change fee.
Construction changes not previously approved and submitted as as -built drawings at the end of the
construction process will be rejected and the securities release will be delayed.
Change of Ownership: If a change of ownership occurs following approval of the drawing(s), the new
owner will be required to submit to the City a construction change revising the title sheet of the plan to
reflect the new ownership. The construction change shall be submitted to the Engineering front counter
as redline mark -ups on two blueline prints of the approved drawing together with two copies of the grant
deed or title report reflecting the new ownership. Construction change fees apply. The current owner will
be required to post new securities to replace those held by the City under the name of the former owner,
and the securities posted by the former owner will be released when the replacement securities have been
received and approved by the City.
Change of Engineer of Work: If a change in engineer of work occurs following the approval of the
drawing(s), a construction change shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering
Department. Two copies of the forms for the assumption of responsibility by the new engineer and the
release of responsibility by the former engineer shall be completed and submitted to the City.
Construction change fees apply.
As- builts: Project as -built drawings prepared by the Engineer of Work will be required prior to Final
Grading acceptance by Engineering Services. Changes to the approved plans require a construction
change to be submitted to the City prior to field implementation. Construction changes may not be
submitted as as_builts at the end of the construction process.
This letter does not change owner or successor -in- interest obligations. If there should be a substantial
delay in the start of your project or a change of ownership, please contact the City to request an update.
Should you have questions regarding the posting of securities, please contact Debra Geishart, who
processes all Engineering securities, at (760) 633 -2779.
Should you have any other questions, please contact me at (760) 633 -2780 or visit the Engineering
Counter at the Civic Center to speak with an Engineering Technician.
Sincerely,
q""I"
Ruben Macabitas
Assistant Civil Engineer
cc Sampo Engineering, Inc., R. Pelagio
Debbie Geishart, Engineering Technician
Masih Maher, Senior Civil Engineer
permit/file
Eric Application
Requirements for Proof of Insurance
Security Obligation Agreements (various)
Sampo Enuineerinajnc.
��� ®•r; Land Planning, Civil Engineering. Surveying, Mapping
page 1 of 1
s CITY OF ENCINITAS j.n. 07 -125
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 12/16/2008
FOR PRECISE GRADING
1007 -1021 HERMES AVE
ENCINITAS, CA
AP N: 254- 325 - 43,44,45
DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT COST TOTAL
CLEAR AND GRUB
EXCAVATE AND FILL
EXCAVATE AND EXPORT (1 -1,000 CY)
EXCAVATE AND EXPORT (1,001- 20,000 CY)
Brow Ditch type B RSD D -75 PVT
Masonry Retaining wall C -1 & C-4 PVT
12 Catch basin PVT by brooks DI 1212 with steel grate
4" PVC STORM DRAIN - PRIVATE
CURB FLUSH, 6 "X16" PVT
POROUS PCC PAVING 5 "76" CL2 AB PVT RD, ALLEY
PCC DRIVEWAYS AND WALKS
TURFBLOCK
PCC CROSS GUTTER PER SDRSD G -12
2" AC OVERLAY
SAWCUT
Trench Resurfacing Per SDG -107 & 108
Silt Fence Caltrans SE -1
Gravel Bags
Stablized Const. Entrance Caltrans TC -1 type 2
42,388 SF
300 CY
1,000 CY
200
240 LF
2,600 SF
4 EA
20 LF
666 LF
7,648 SF
1,815 SF
2,140 SF
432 SF
4,510 SF
160 LF
16 LF
927 LF
120 EA
400 SF
$0.45
$20.00
$27.50
$22.00
$15.00
$29.65
$1,500.00
$20.00
$12.00
$600
$500
$1.70
$8.00
$0.45
$4.00
$25.00
$1.60
$1.10
$5.25
SUBTOTAL
10% CONTINGENCY
TOTAL
$19,074.60
$6,000.00
$27,500.00
$4,400.00
$3,600.00
$77,090.00
$6,000.00
$400.00
$7,992.00
$45,888.00
$9,075.00
$3,638.00
$3,456.00
$2,029.50
$640.00
$400.00
$1,483.20
$132.00
$2,100.00
$220,898.30
$22,089.83
$242,988.13
1034 SECOND STREET ENCINITAS, CA 92024 PHONE: (760) 436 -0660 FAX: (760) 436 -0659
info@sampoengineering.com
N
^ Sampo Enuineerine,Inc.
'erg Land Planning, Civil Engineering, Surveying. Mapping
\T, page 7 of 1
s CITY OF ENCINITAS j.n. 07 -125
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 10/2/2008
FOR IMPROVEMENT PLANS
1007 -1021 HERMES AVE
ENCINITAS, CA
APN: 254 - 325 -43,44,45
DESCRIPTION
QTY
UNIT COST
TOTAL
5" POROUS PCC PAVING & BASE
7,831 SF
$6.00
$46,986.00
6" AC PAVEMENT & BASE
355 SF
$215
$763.25
2" MIN AC PAVEMENT OVERLAY
4,170 CY
$1 00
$4,170.00
6" x 16" PCC FLUSH CURB
138 LF
$1200
$1,656.00
TURF BLOCK
1,205 SF
$1.70
$2,048.50
PCC CROSS GUTTER PER SDRSD G -12
432 SF
$8.00
$3,456.00
SAWCUT
160 LF
$4.00
$640.00
SUBTOTAL
$59,719.75
10% CONTINGENCY
$5,971.98
TOTAL
$65,691.73
OCT 6 2008
1034 SECOND STREET ENCINITAS, CA 92024 PHONE: (760) 436 -0660 FAX: (760) 436 -0659
info@sampoengineering.com
PARCEL NO.
JOB SITE ADDRESS:
APPLICANT NAME
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: ESCONDIDO
C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
505 S. VULCAN AVE.
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
IMPROVEMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 949 II
---------------------------------------- - - - - -- 7777 --
254- 325 -4300 PLAN NO.: 949 -G
1007- 1021 HERMES AVENUE CASE NO.: 05169 / CDP
KEVIN STEPHENS
1500 W. 11TH STREET PHONE NO.: 760 - 740 -0885
STATE: CA ZIP: 92029 -0885
CONTRACTOR : OVERSON CORPORATION PHONE NO.: 619 - 258 -5900
LICENSE NO.: 524650 LICENSE TYPE: A
INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: QBE SPECIALITY INSURANCE CO.
POLICY NO. GXG00695 POLICY EXP. DATE: 7/15/11
ENGINEER SAMPO ENGINEERING PHONE NO.: 76,07 436 -0660
PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 3/08/11
PERMIT EXP. DATE: 3/08/12 PERMIT ISSUED BY:
INSPECTOR: NICK DEILE
-------
------------ - - -- --
PERMIT FEES
& DEPOSITS ----------------------------
1.
PERMIT FEE
.00
2. GIS MAP FEE
.00
3.
INSPECTION FEE
3,284.00
4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT:
.00
5.
NPDES INSPT FEE
656.00
6. SECURITY DEPOSIT
65,691.00
7.
FLOOD CONTROL FE
.00
B. TRAFFIC FEE
.00
9.
IN -LIEU UNDERGRN
.00
10.IN -LIEU IMPROVMNT
.00
11.PLAN
CHECK FEE
.00
12.PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT:
.00
-------------
------ - - - - --
DESCRIPTION
OF WORK -------- ------ ----
------- - - - - --
PERMIT TO GUARANTEE BOTH THE PERFORMANCE AND LABOR /MATERIALS FOR THE
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED IMPROVEMENT PLAN 949 -I. CONTRACTOR
MUST MAINTAIN TRAFFIC CONTROL AT ALL TIMES PER APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL
PLAN OR PER W.A.T.C.H. STANDARDS. LETTER DATED MAY 17, 2010 APPLIES.
- - -- INSPECTION ---------- - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - --
INITIAL INSPECTION
FINAL INSPECTION
AS- BUILTS AND ONE YEAR WARRANTY RETENTION REQUIRED.
I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER
PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE.
SIGNATURE
---,\ �C� F �� /LSOti
PRINT NAME
CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3. OTHER
14 spa-((-
DATE SIGNED
r(or- 1 z '�_s Is9q__*
TELEPHONE NUMBER
Samno Engineering, Inc.
W4 -E Land Planning, Civil Engineering, Surveying, Mapping
f
s
December 20, 2012
page 1 of 1
Debra Geishart
City of Encinitas
Engineering Department
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633
Subject: Stephens Property, 202, 203, 206, 207, 210, 211, 214, 215, 219 Leucadia,
Subdivision Map No. 15809
Dear Debra,
Our office has set the monuments as shown on Subdivision Map 15809 for the subject
properties, and has been paid for said services. If you have questions please feel free to
contact me.
Sincerely,
,L re/-7
Vince Sampo, PE, PLS
President
1034 Second Street ♦ Encinitas, CA 92024 ♦ phone: 760 -436 -0660 ♦ fax: 760 -436 -0659
info@sampoengineering.com
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
505 S. VULCAN AVE.
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 949 GI
PARCEL NO. : 254- 325 -4300
JOB SITE ADDRESS: 1007- 1021 HERMES
APPLICANT NAME KEVIN STEPHENS
MAILING ADDRESS: 1500 W. 11TH STREET
CITY: ESCONDIDO STATE:
CONTRACTOR : OWNER /BUILDER
LICENSE NO.:
ENGINEER SAMPO'ENGINEERING
PERMIT ISSUE D E: 3/08/11
PERMIT EXP. E: 3/08/12
INSPECTOR: NICK DEILE ,
-
----------- --- - -- - -- PERMIT
1. PERMIT\FEE
3. INSPECT`�-W_FEE 9,289
5. NPDES INSPT FEE 1,857
7. FLOOD CONTROL FE 381
9. IN -LIEU UNDERGRN 64,000
ll.PLAN CHECK FEE
AVENUE
CA ZIP
PERMIT ISSUED BY
FEES & DEPOSITS
PLAN NO.: 949 -G
CASE NO.: 05169 / CDP
PHONE NO.: 760 - 740 -0885
92029 -0885
PHONE NO.: 760 - 740 -0885
LICENSE TYPE:
PHONE�ATQ.: 760- 436 -0660
00
2.
GIS MAP FEE
375.00
00
4.
INSPECTION DEPOSIT:
.00
00
6.
SECURITY DEPOSIT
242,988.00
00
8.
TRAFFIC FEE
.00
00
10.IN
-LIEU IMPROVMT
.00
00
12.PLAN
CHECK DEPOSIT:
.00
-------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF WORK ----- -- - - -- - ------------------
PERMIT TO GUARANTEE BOTH PERFORMANCE AND LABOR /MATERIALS FOR EARTHWORK,
DRAINAGE, PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS AND EROSION CONTROL. CONTRACTOR MUST
MAINTAIN TRAFFIC CONTROL AT ALL TIMES PER APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
OR PER W.A.T.C.H. STANDARDS. LETTER DATED MAY 17, 2010 APPLIES. IMP.
PERMIT NEEDS TO BE ISSUED PRIOR TO WORK IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
INSPECTION ------ --- ---- - -- DATE -- - - - - --
INITIAL INSPECTION
COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED I`
ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED 1� =`•°
ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION
FINAL INSPECTION
INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - --
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE
INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE
LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF
ANY PERMIT ISSUE PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION.
GNAT DATE SIGIfED
RINT NAME
CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3. OTHER
7Go- �, 0 6F o
�3
TELEPHONE NUMBER
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
city �� Capitol Improvement Projects
District Support Services
Enctnrtas field operolions
Subdivision Engineering
Traffic Engineering
ROUGH GRADING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL�9S1�i'
TO: Subdivision Engineering O 9
Public Service Counter e 1 I C6
FROM: Field Operations
Private Contract Inspection
RE: Grading Permit No.
Name of Project �� y ��I '� V t
Name of Developer
S
Site Location
((50,?— 1 Qa
(-)rc(ZnA-e.S
(address ...number
...street name
.
..- suffix) lloU (bldg)
The proposed grading of the subject site will require construction of retaining
walls that are also building walls. The inspection of the site retaining walls is to be
done by the Field Operations Division of the Engineering Services Department.
However, the inspection of the building retaining walls is to be done by the
Building Inspection Division of the Community Development Department -
Therefore, issuance of the necessary Building Permit is requested in order to
facilitate the completion of rough grading.
NO INSPECTIONS BEYOND FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATION ARE TO BE
PROVIDED BY BUILDING INSPECTION UNTIL A NOTICE OF ROUGH
GRADING APPROVAL, WITHOUT CONDITIONS AND SIGNED BY THE
ENGINEERING INSPECTOR, IS RECEIVED. FRAMING IS PROHIBITED.
(Signature of Engineering inspector)
Mate)
(Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if appropiatel (Datel
Reference: Building Permit No.
Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering
technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a full rough grading approval and submit that paperwork, when
completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building
Inspection. Thank you.
JSG /field1doc l
TEL 760 - 633 -1600 1 FAX 760 - 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 TDD 7W633 -2700 1� recycled paper
v
W_�_t;
Sampo Engineering, Inc.
Land Planning, Civil Engineering, Surveying, Mapping
1
S
November 27, 2012
Page 1 of 1
City of Encinitas
Engineering Services Permits
505 South Vulcan Ave.
Encinitas, CA 92024
Re: Engineer's Final Grading Verification for Project No. 05 -169 CDP and
Grading Permit Number 949 -G.
The grading under permit number 949 -G has been performed in substantial
conformance with the approved grading plans or as shown on the attached 'As Graded'
plan.
Final grading inspection has demonstrated that lot drainage conforms to the approved
grading plan and that swales drain at a minimum of 1 % to the street and /or an
appropriate drainage system.
All the Low Impact Development, Source Control and Treatment Control Best
Management Practices as shown on the drawing and required by the Best Management
Practice Manual Part II were constructed and are operational, together with the required
maintenance covenant(s).
Engineer of Record
Vincent L. Sampo' * t�aµ�
t
Dated 11/27117,
Verification by the Engineering Inspector of this fact is done by the Inspector's signature
hereon and will take place only after the above is signed and stamped and will not
relieve the Engineer of Record ofAhe ultimate responsibility:
t )
Engineering I spector:
Dated: I �— 2� ti
1034 Second Street • Encinitzc, CA 92024 ♦ phone: 760 - 436 -0660 • fax: 760 -436 -0659
v i nceC.aNa mpoenginee ri ng.com
City of
Encinitas
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Capital Improvement Projects
District Support Services
Field Operations
Subdivision Engineering
Traffic Engineering
ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL
TO: Subdivision Engineering /
Public Service Counter
FROM: Field Operations
Private Contract Inspection /
RE: Grading Permit No. C
Name of Project
Name of Developer / v
r'vvs C S
Site Location � % -- / Lj7 1 k' suffix) d nou (bldg)
(address ...number ...streetnamme
1 have inspected the grad' gat the subjectsite an have erified certification of the pad by
the Engineer of Work, :� dated - `, and certification of soil
compaction by the Soil Engine r, date&— J (`. I am hereby
satisfied that the rough grading has been completed in acco danc wlt�j the approved
plans and specifications, Chapter 23.24 of the Municipal Code, and any other applicable
engineering standards and specific project requirements.
Based on my observation and the certifications, I take no exception to the issuance of a
building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is
concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to
other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, par(, and trail
improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred
monumentation, or final grading.
Prior to final inspection of the Building Permitls) and legal occupancy. I need to be further
advised so hat I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and
irrigation) 0as been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
(Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if appropiate)
Reference: Building Permit No. _ --
"z
(Date)
(Date)
Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering
technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork.
when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with
Building Inspection. Thank you.
10
1SG /fteld3.docl
TEL 760 - 633 -2600 / FAX 760 -633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas, California 920243633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 recycled paper
PUPIL T6
June 8, 2011
Lori Robinson
K.F. Steghens,Inc.
150011 Avenue
Escondido, California 92029
Subject: File No. 1147B4 -07
Report of Compacted Filled Ground
Proposed Residential Building Site
1007 -1021 Hennes Avenue
City of Escondido
Dear Ms. Robinson:
P.O. Box 1195
Lakeside, California
92040
(619) 443 -0060
In accordance with your request, our firm has inspected the grading operation and tested the fill
soils that were placed and compacted during the preparation of the subject side. This is to report
the results of our soil tests. The work was performed during the period between October 29,
2007 and November 7, 2007. The site is located at 20402 Elfin Forest Road, Escondido area,
County of San Diego
To briefly summarize the work, we found the compaction of the fill soils to conform to the
recommended and approved grading specifications and current standard practices.
SECTION No. 1. SCOPE
Our function consisted of providing the engineering services involved with determining the
degree of compaction of fill placed on the site in accordance with the recommendations set forth
in the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Coast Geotechnicai, dated October 3,
2005.
The results of the field density tests are presented on Page T -1 through T -2 under "Table of Test
Results ". The laboratory determinations of the maximum dry densities and optimum moisture
contents of the fill soils are set forth on Page L -1 under "Laboratory Test Results ". The
approximate locations of the filled ground and the field density tests are presented on Plate No. 1
entitled "Location of Field Density Tests ".
K.F. Stephens File No. 1147134 -07 June 8, 2011
The grading was performed for the purpose of recompacting existing fill soils and loose native
soils and to create a level building pads for the construction of the proposed single family
residences.
SECTION No. 2. SOIL CONDITIONS
Soils used in the fill were those generated from the on -site excavation.
EARTHWORK
Preparation: Prior to placement of fill, the areas to receive fill were scarified, watered and
compacted to 90 percent. Natural ground to receive fill was tested to determine its relative
compaction. Native soils having a relative compaction of less than 85 percent were removed,
replaced and compacted to 90 percent.
Placing and compacting fill: Fill soil was placed, watered and mechanically densified in the
areas indicated on attached Plate No. 1. During grading, any fill found to have a relative
compaction of less than 90 percent was reworked until the proper density of 90 percent had been
achieved.
Field density test results: To verify compaction, field density tests were performed in
accordance with applicable American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) test methods.
Test method ASTM D 1556 -82 was used at the indicated locations.
SECTION No. 3. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the work and tests described hereinbefore and work description set forth in Section 1,
'Scope', we conclude:
The filled ground has been compacted to 90%.
2. The placement of fill has been accomplished in accordance with the grading
specifications and with current standard practices.
Spread footings will have a minimum allowable bearing value of at least 2000
pounds per square foot. The allowable bearing value will be considerably more
for footings larger than 12 inches wide and/or 12 inches deep. If loads heavier
than 2000 pounds per square foot for continuous footings are anticipated, we
should be contacted for an increased bearing value.
K.F. Stephens File No. 1147134 -07 June 8, 2011
4. Expansive soils were not encountered. Conventional spread footings founded a
minimum of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade and having a width determined
by the allowable soil bearing value as detailed above are recommended for
foundation support. Footing widths should be at least 12 and 24 inches for
continuous and square footings respectively due to practical considerations as well
as Building Code requirements. Reinforcing in footings should consist of one #4
steel bar placed continuously in the top and bottom of continuous footings regardless
of structural requirements. Reinforcing for isolated footings are dictated by the
structural requirements.
5. Concrete slab -on -grade should be constructed to have a nominal thickness of 4"
and underlain with a sand blanket of 3 inches in thickness. Provide minimum
temperature reinforcement consisting of 6X6 -10 /10 welded wire mesh. The sand
subbase (sand blanket) should have a sand equivalent exceeding 30 per ASTM
D2419. All slabs should either have a conventional thickened edge or be poured
monolithically with continuous footings at the slabs perimeter. Conventional
thickened edges should be 8" thick at slab edge, uniformly tapering to 4" thick at
2' from slab edge. The thickened edges or monolithic footings should extend
completely around the slab's perimeter. Constriction and expansion joints should
be considered slab edges. Maximum spacing of expansion joints is 50' for interior
slabs and 30' for exterior slabs.
SECTION No. 4. LIMITATIONS
UNIFORMYN OF SOIL CONDITIONS:
The values presented in this report are based on our evaluation of the observed, exposed soil
conditions. We have assumed that the soil conditions in the remaining portions of the site can be
interpolated without significant deviation in physical properties. We have made a conscientious
effort to select representative test locations and to provide enough tests for a statistically
adequate population in excess of current standard practices. However, parameter values may be
substantially different in other areas due to unforeseeable variations in the soils. Also, the
parameters are affected in time by the moisture - expansion (volume)- pressure changes that
seriously affect the tested values.
ENGINEERING INTERPRETATION:
We are available for consultation and should be made aware of any pertinent condition or
problem. Our conclusions will be re- evaluated and any problem or potential problem solved
with a minimum effort and cost before it gets out -of -hand.
TIME LIMITS:
This report presents conclusions and findings that are valid as of this date. Changes on this site
K.F. Stephens File No. 1147134 -07 June 8, 2011
and adjacent property including grading, improvements, drainage, erosion, etc. may directly
affect the findings, conclusions and recommendations presented herein. Subsequent alterations
or conditions may invalidate these recommendations and values. The values in this report will
probably remain applicable for one year provided the site conditions remain unaltered. After this
period, we should be contacted to inspect the site and review this report so that we may verify its
validity.
WARRANTY:
Certain risks are involved with geotechnical and soil engineering work, which should be
recognized by those involved. We have performed our services in accordance with current
standard practices and procedures. These practices and procedures are those presently utilized
by members of our profession in this region. We do not express or imply a warranty or
guarantee regarding these services.
OUTSIDE RESPONSIBILITY:
It is the responsibility of the client (firm or person to whom this report is submitted) to insure
that the information presented herein is made available to the concerned parties. In addition it is
the client's responsibility to make certain that any construction reflects any applicable
requirements and conforms with the current codes of jurisdictive governmental agencies.
PROJECT CONCEPT:
We should be notified of any changes in the proposed structures, construction, or site grading, or
project concept so that any addendum or modifications to this report may be provided as
necessary.
Summary of the
GRADING SPECIFICATIONS USED
for
Proposed Residential Building Site
1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue
City of Escondido
SOIL TEST METHODS:
Maximum Density & Opt Moisture
Density of Soil In -Place
Soil Expansion
Shear Strength
Gradation & Grain Size
Capillary Moisture Tension
-- ASTM D1557 -78
ASTM D1556 -82
- UBC STANDARD 29 -2
ASTM D3080 -72
-- ASTM D1140 -71
ASTM D2325 -68
K.F. Stephens File No. 1147134 -07 June 8, 2011
LIMITING SOIL CONDITIONS:
Minimum Compaction 901/6 for "disturbed" soils. (Existing
fill, newly placed fill, plowed ground, etc.)
85% for natural, undisturbed soils.
95% for pavement subgrade within 2' of finish grade and
pavement base course.
Expansive Soils Expansion index exceeding 20
Insufficient Fines Less than 40% passing the #4 sieve.
Oversized Particles -- Rocks over 10" in diameter.
PREPARATION FOR FILL:
Brush, trash, debris and detrimental soils were cleared from the area to receive fill. Detrimental
soil was removed to competent soil. Slopes exceeding 20% were stepped with benches 10' or
greater in width. The area to be filled was scarified to a 6" depth and compacted.
FILL MATERIAL:
Contained sufficient fines and did not contain oversized particles or excessive organics. Special
attention was given to the disposition of any oversized rock, organic soils and expansive soils.
Please read this report carefully. If you have any questions, please contact our office. This
opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated.
Page L -1, Page T -1 through T -2 and Plate No. 1 are parts of this report
Respectfully submitted,
Joseph . Smykh, RCE 21650
cc: (3) submitted
K.F. Stephens File No. 1147B4 -07 June 8, 2011
Page L -1
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill materials as determined by the
A.S.T.M., D1557 -78, Method A, which uses 25 blows of a 10 pound rammer falling from a height of 18
inches on each of 5 layers in a 4 inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot compaction cylinder, are presented as
follows:
Maximum Optimum
Expansion Dry Density Moisture
Soil Type Index 1bJcu ft. Content dry wt.
1 Brown, silty, fine to medium
sand
2 Tan, silty, fine to medium
sand with clay binder
3 Grey, silty, fine to coarse sand
Class I1 Base
4 Tan, silty, fine to medium
sand with clay binder
126.2
10.2
22 129.1
9.2
138.4
8.5
120.6
11.7
K.F. Stephens File No. 1 1 47134 -0 7 June 8, 2011
Page T -1
TABLE OF TEST RESULTS
A.S.T.M., D1556 -82
DEPTH
MAXIMUM
OF FILL
FIELD
DRY
DRY
TEST
SOIL
AT TEST
MOISTURE
DENSITY
DENSITY
PERCENT
NO.
TYPE
IN FEET
%
P.C.F.
P.C.F.
COMPACTION
1
1
+2
15.5
119.8
126.2
94.9
2
2
+4
10.9
121.7
129.1
94.3
3
1
+2
10.7
114.1
126.2
90A
4
1
+2
11.4
114.3
126.2
90.6
5
1
+2
11.1
115.8
126.2
91.7
6
1
+2
11.3
116.5
126.2
92.3
7
1
+6
10.8
117.1
126.2
92.8
8
2
+2
10.9
127.6
129.1
98.8
9
2
+4 f.g.
9.1
117.3
129.1
90.9
10
2
+4 f.g.
9.3
123.7
129.1
95.8
11
2
+4 fg.
9.4
122.2
129.1
94.7
12
2
+4 fg.
9.0
121.8
129.1
94.4
13
2
+4 f.g.
9.3
118.7
129.1
91.9
14
2
+4 f.g.
8.7
117.7
129.1
92.1
15
2
+4 f.g.
9.8
122.1
129.1
94.6
K.F. Stephens
Page T -2
File No. 1147134 -07
TABLE OF TEST RESULTS
A.S.T.M., D1556 -82
June 8. 2011
f g. = finish grade
s.g. = subgrade
DEPTH
MAXIMUM
OF FILL
FIELD
DRY
DRY
TEST
SOIL
AT TEST
MOISTURE
DENSITY
DENSITY
PERCENT
NO.
TYPE
IN FEET
%
P.C.F.
P.C.F.
COMPACTION
16
2
+4
8.8
121.5
129.1
94.1
17
2
+6 s.g.
8.5
123.7
129.1
95.8
18
3
base
8.1
134.5
138.4
97.3
19
2
fg.
8.5
119.6
129.1
92.6
20
2
+2
8.8
118.4
129.1
91.7
21
4
+4
8.6
117.8
120.6
97.7
22
2
s.g.
8.4
121.3
129.1
93.9
23
3
base
7.7
134.2
138.4
97.0
24
4
+2
12.7
115.9
120.6
96.1
25
4
+4
9.1
119.7
120.6
99.3
26
4
+2
11.9
118.4
120.6
98.2
27
4
+4
11.5
117.9
120.6
97.8
f g. = finish grade
s.g. = subgrade
Z
m
m/a 16
c, I,
c
m
.3
•i4
Zo .y
Uzi
24
— r- --z- -_ • z s
• /3
s
' +Y
zL
CIS
• I/
s i2
�/O
FIELD DENSITY TEST
COMPACTED FILL
�— TOP OF SLOPE
TOE OF SLOPE
LOCATION OF
FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Pt Ale T
JOB NO.
//y7ay -o-7
BY
MtJ
DATE
G — /y— II
�• ^/p SCALE "
a '44
IN4011, TI:STI:RS e
11421 Woodside Ave., Suite C
Santee, California 92071
(619) 562 -0500
PREGRADE MEETING
For
1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue
Permit No. 949 GI
DATE April 25, 201 l
Monday 1:15 PM
Owner: Kevin Stephens Leucadia Grove 9 lots
Civil Engineer: Sampo
General Contractor: KF Stephens Inc
Grading Contractor: TNT Grading DBA
Soils Engineer: Coast Geotechnical
Engineering Inspector: City of Encinitas, NICK DEILE
Mobile (760) 802 -8147 (760) 633 -2782
office hours: 7 -8:00 a.m. & 3-4:00 p.m.
Sewer District LWWD
Water District San Dieguito
Hours of operations. (NOISE ORDINANCE).
7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. This includes warm up of equipment. All equipment
,repairs to be within designated hours.
Grading Ordinance does not allow work on Saturdays, Sundays or City recognized
holidays.
2. SWPPP
Per WDID # 9 370359957 developer is required to retain a QSP, name and
telephone number
Erosion Control
October 1st to April 15th. Before rough grading can be signed off, the approved
erosion control plan must be implemented. This includes all temporary BMP's.
3. Dust Control and Dirt/Mud Trackin¢. Soil must be properly moisture conditioned
to prevent dust. Hermes Avenue must be kept clean at all times. Any dirt/mud
tracked onto public streets must be cleaned up immediately. No staging or
stockpiling of building materials on Hermes Avenue. During import / export
operations, the street must be swept clean.
A separate permit and approved traffic control plan will be required for any work
within the public right of way. Use High Visibility Warning Signs, minimum size
to be 48 ".
4. 24 hour emergency contact person and phone number, Glenn Carson 760 -420-
8013 Superintendent cellular telephone
5. Work Area: No work outside the areas shown on the approved plans.
No staging or stockpiling of building materials on Hermes Avenue.
precon
"The grading under permit no. 949 G 1 has been performed in substantial
conformance with the approved grading plan or as shown on the attached as- graded
Plan" This statement shall be followed by the date and signature of the civil engineer
•., ho certifies such grading operation (see grading note no. 11 on the grading plan).
BMP certification, all brow ditches, vegetated swales and turf block complete and
operational.
All slopes need to be planted, irrigated and established (50.75% coverage).
All flatwork complete including PCC driveways.
Final walk -thru & punchlist completed for all agencies.
- Note * ** NO OCCUPANCY SHALL BE GRANTED UNTIL
I-FSITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE BUILT AND FINISHED TO THE
k FISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER.
precon
SAMPLE
Date:
City of Encinitas
Engineering Services Permits
505 South Vulcan Ave.
Encinitas, CA 92024
Re: Engineer's Pad Certification for Project No. 99 -001 TM and
Grading Permit Number XXXX - G.
Pursuant to section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad
Certification Letter for lots through and including . As the Engineer of Record
for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading for these units has been completed in
conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards-
23.24.3 10 (B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the
approved grading plan:
23.24.310(B)1. Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices and/or retaining
walls have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan.
23.24.310(B)5. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified
and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan.
23.24.310 (B)6. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been
field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan.
The above information shall be on the Engineer of Record's letterhead and shall be signed and sealed
by the Engineer of Record.
Padcert.doc
Pad Elevation
Pad Elevation
Lot No.
Per plan
per field measurement
I
100.00
100.06
2
103.00
102.96
3
100.00
100.09
4
102.00
102.09
23.24.310(B)1. Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices and/or retaining
walls have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan.
23.24.310(B)5. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified
and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan.
23.24.310 (B)6. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been
field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan.
The above information shall be on the Engineer of Record's letterhead and shall be signed and sealed
by the Engineer of Record.
Padcert.doc
SAMPLE
Date:
City of Encinitas
Engineering Services Permits
505 South Vulcan Ave.
Encinitas, CA 92024
Re: Engineer's Final Grading Certification for Project No. 99 -001 TM and
Grading Permit Number XXXX - G.
The grading under permit number XXXX has been performed in substantial conformance with
the approved grading plan or as shown on the attached 'As Graded' plan.
Final grading inspection has demonstrated that lot drainage conforms with the approved
grading plan and that swales drain at a minimum of 1% to the street and /or an appropriate
drainage system.
All the Low Impact Development, Source Control and Treatment Control Best Management
Practices as shown on the drawing and required by the Best Management Practice Manual
Part II were constructed and are operational, together with the required maintenance
covenant(s).
Verification by the Engineering Inspector of this fact is done by the Inspector's signature
hereon and will take place only after the above is signed and stamped and will not relieve the
Engineer of Record of the ultimate responsibility:
Engineering Inspector:
IkiiTi
The above information shall be on the Engineer of Record's letterhead and shall be
signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record.
I'adccrt doc
1 112' AC FINISH COURSE 112' MAX. AGGREGATE
PLANE 1 1/2' DEEP AND TRENCH WIDTH IF LESS THAN 2'
12' BEYOND TRENCH LINE SEE SPECS. REMOVE /REPLACE
PAVEMENT TO GUTTER
t2. OR REMOVE /REPLACE -
iiz AC BERM.
EXIST. AC 6'CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE
r PAVEMENT COMPACTED TO 957 MIN.
RELATIVE COMPACTION
LD
w AC FIRST C01URSE -3/4'
= MAX. AGGREGATE PAVEMENT REINFORCEMENT
wEXIST. PAVEMENT PLUS MEMBRANES IE. PETROMAT,
1' AC -MIN. 3' AC 3 12' GLASSGRID, OR EQUAL.
C
in a W N NATIVE OR IMPORTED MATERIA
M o w APPROVED BY THE OFFICE OF
THE CITY ENGINEER TOP 12'
COMPACTED TO 95% MIN.
RELATIVE COMPACTION.
a ti
4' BEDDING
SEE SPECS
NOTES
WARNING TAPE
L FOR DEPTHS UP TO 5', NO TRENCH SUPPORT IS REQUIRED UNLESS WET, UNSTABLE
OR RUNNING SOIL IS ENCOUNTERED.FOR DEPTHS EXCEEDING 5 FEET, SHORING OR
SOLID SHEATHING IS REQUIRED. WHERE WET, UNSTABLE OR RUNNING SOIL IS
ENCOUNTERED, SOLID SHEATHING IS REQUIRED.
2 EXISTING A.C. SHALL BE CUT AND REMOVED IN SUCH A MANNER SO AS NOT TO
TEAR, BULGE OR DISPLACE ADJACENT PAVEMENT, EDGES SHALL BE CLEAN AND
VERTICAL. ALL CUTS SHALL BE PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO STREET
CENTERLINE, WHEN PRACTICAL.
3. FINISH COURSE OF AC RESURFACING SHALL BE LAID DOWN USING A SELF
PROPELLED SPREADER BOX; UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.
4. CHIP OR SLURRY SEALING SHALL BE APPLIED AS REQUIRED BY AGENCY.
L
lei
y
i
N
t
W_ —E Sampo Engineerinp.,
I Civil Engineering, Surveying,
s
City of Encinitas
Engineering Services Permits
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
Planning
June 2, 2011
Page 1 of 2
RE: Engineer's Pad Verification for Grading for Leucadia Grove, Grading Permit No.
949 -G, Case No. 05 -169
Pursuant to section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted
as a Pad Verification Letter for the subject grading plan. As the Engineer of Record for the
subject project, I hereby state all rough grading for the pads of the new residential buildings
and garages have been completed in substantial conformance with the approved plans, and
the requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards.
The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved
grading plan:
Plan Approved
Field Measured
Pad Elevation
Pad Elevation
Lot 1
Building Pad
68.5
68.5
Garage Pad
67.2
67.2
Lot 2
Building Pad
68.7
68.7
Garage Pad
68.0
68.0
Lot 3
Building Pad
70.5
70.5
Garage Pad
69.3•
69.4
Lot 4
Building Pad
72.2
72.3
Garage Pad
71.5
71.5
Lot 5
Building Pad
73.7
73.6
Garage Pad
73.0
73.0
Page 2 of 2
NO=
Building Pad
75.2
75.1
Garage Pad
74.0
73.9
Lot 7
Building Pad
76.2
76.2
Garage Pad
75.0
75.0
Lot 8
Building Pad
70.7
70.7
Garage Pad
69.4*
69.4
Lot 9
Building Pad
68.2
68.2
Garage Pad
67.4*
67.5
Note : " *" Indicates Grading Plan to be changed at time of as- builts to reflect actual pad
elevation surveyed on May 11, 2011. Finish floor elevations and building heights remain as
shown on the approved grading and building plans.
S,Siinncerely,
Vincent ampo, E PLS
Principal
1034 Second Street ♦ Encinitas, CA 92024 ♦ phone: 760 -436 -0660 ♦ fax: 760 - 436 -0659
info@sampoengineering.com
City of Encinitas
505 South Vulcan Avenue
Encinitas, Uifomia 920243633
Tel 760 - 633 -2600 • Fax 760.943 -2226
TED 760 -633 -2700 • —xi.encinitas.ca.us
Fire
Building
Planning
Engineering
Field Clearance to Allow Occupancy
TO: Subdivision Engineering
Public Service Counter
FROM: Field Operations
Private Contract Inspection
RE: Building Permit No. --
Sly 1qVw-kw1?
Name of Project ,C t/ C kt;n r V e_-
Name of Developer 7 4 IJI r,� S C e4-7 S
I have inspected the site at l?' i u C
address... number street name suffix
and have determined that finish (precise) grading
(lot no.) (bldg. no.)
and any other related site improvements are sub5t;�t
ntially complete
e and that o cupancy is merited.
- It 21,/ Z
Signature of Engineering Inspector Date 1
Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if appropriate Dafe
cm cl
Reference: Engineering Permit No. M
Special Note: Please do not sign the 'blue card" that is issued by Building Inspection Division and given to
the developer. You are only being asked to verify field conditions. ice staff still has the responsibility to
verify that compliance with administrative requirements is achieved, typically payment of impact fees or
execution of documents. Return this form, if completed, to counter staff by dropping it in the slot labeled
"Final Inspection'. Also, please remember to do final inspections on the related engineering permits and
return that paperwork. H completed. Thank you.
aw'o
Alexander Court
LOT
Address
Building Permit
1
202
10 -1062
2
206
10 -1068
3
210
10 -1069
4
214
10 -1070
5
219
10 -1071
6
215
10 -1072
7
211
10 -1073
8
209
10 -1074
9
203
10 -1075
ww��
0 Policy of Title Insurance
CLTA Standard Coverage o y
Fidelity National Title Insurance Companv
A STOCK COMPANY
POLICY 27- 01
NUMBER -90- 972553
CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE BAND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, FIDELITYNATIONAL
TYRE INSURANCE COMPANY a California corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of
Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance
stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of:
1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein;
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title;
3. Unmarketability of the title;
4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land;
and, in addition, as to an insured lender only:
5. The invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage upon the title;
6. The priority of any lien or encumbrance over the lien of the insured mortgage, said mortgage being
shown in Schedule B in the order of its priority;
7 The invalidity or unenforceability of any assignment of the insured mortgage, provided the
assignment is shown in Schedule B, or the failure of the assignment shown in Schedule B to vest
title to the insured mortgage in the named insured assignee free and clear of all liens.
The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title or the
lien of the insured mortgage, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations.
IN WFTNESS WHEREOF, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this Policy
to be signed and sealed by its duly authorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A.
Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
SEAL;
Countersigned:
Authorized Signature
FORM 27 -01 -90
Reprinted (2197)
California land Title Association
Standard Coverage Policy Form - 1990
x ina
SCHEDULE A
U0
Order Number: 07- 2951052 Policy No.: 27- 01- 901972553
Amount of Insurance: $ 3,425,000.00
Premium: $ 709.00
Date of Policy: November 8, 2007 at 03:30 p.m.
1 . Name of Insured:
229 -231 Coast Blvd., Inc.
2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is:
A Fee
3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in:
229 -231 Coast Blvd., Inc., a California corporation
4. The land referred to in this policy is situated in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State
of California, and is described as follows:
SEE EXHIBIT "ONE" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
THIS POLICY VALID ONLY IF SCHEDULE B IS ATTACHED
1
CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1990
EXHIBIT "ONE"
Parcel A:
Order No. 07- 2951052
Policy No. 27- 01- 901972553
All Lots 9, 10 and 11 of Block 4 of South Coast Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego,
State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
San Diego County, January 11, 1924.
Excepting therefrom the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lots 9 and 10 and the Southerly 60.00 feet of the
Westerly 145.00 feet of Lot 11 thereof.
Parcel B:
Lot 10 in Block 4 of South Coast Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of
California, according to Map thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County, January 11, 1924.
Excepting therefrom that portion of Lot 10 shown in Parcel A in that certain Document entitled
Certificate of Compliance recorded January 19, 1978 as File No. 78- 024670 of Official Records.
Parcel C:
The Southerly 60.00 feet of the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lot 11 in Block 4 of South Coast Park, in the
City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1776, filed
in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, January 11, 1924-
Assessor's Parcel No: 254- 325 -43, 254 - 325 -45 and 254 - 325 -44
2
CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1990
Order No. 07- 2951052
Policy No. 27-01-90/972553
SCHEDULE B
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorney's fees
or expenses) which arise by reason of:
LT—q.11111111
All matters set forth in paragraphs 1 through 5 inclusive on the cover of this policy under the caption
Part I of Schedule B.
n fill
Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with
taxes, for the fiscal year 2007 -2008, Assessor's Parcel Number 254- 325 -43.
Code Area Number:
1st Installment:
2nd Installment:
Land:
Improvements:
Exemption:
Personal Property:
19317
$8,045.37 Paid
$8,045.37 Open
$1,040,400.00
$387,600.00
$None
S
2. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with
taxes, for the fiscal year 2007 -2008, Assessor's Parcel Number 254- 325 -44.
Code Area Number:
1st Installment:
2nd Installment:
Land:
Improvements:
Exemption:
Personal Property:
19084
$4,595.95 Paid
$4,595.95 Open
$816,000.00
$51,000.00
$None
S
3
CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1930
kl
m
0
3
VA
Order No. 07- 2951052
Policy No. 27 -01- 90/972553
Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with
taxes, for the fiscal year 2007 -2008, Assessor's Parcel Number 254 - 325 -45.
Code Area Number:
1st Installment:
2nd Installment:
Land:
Improvements:
Exemption:
Personal Property:
19317
$3,678.22 Paid
$3,678.22 Open
$489,600.00
$122,400.00
$None
S
The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5
(Commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation code of the State of
California.
�Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a
document;
Granted to: Pacific Bell, a California Corporation
Purpose: Public utilities
Recorded: June 26, 1985, Instrument No. 85- 228050, of Official Records
Affects: Parcel B
Reference is made to said document for full particulars.
A Document entitled "Resolution Annexing Territory to San Diego County Lighting
Maintenance District" recorded April 3, 1986 as File No. 86- 129046 of Official Records.
Affects: Parcels A, B and C
A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other
obligations secured thereby
Amount: $2,000,000.00
Dated: October 24, 2007
Trustor: 229 -231 Coast Blvd., Inc., a California corporation
Trustee: Temecula Valley Bank
Beneficiary: Temecula Valley Bank
Loan No.: 58010195
Recorded: November 8, 2007, Instrument No. 2007 - 0711429, of Official
Records
END OF SCHEDULE B
4
CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1990
GLAUCUS N ) ST -� ,o
6/1 / ST. - - - WID.
LO 69.!2 &l.93 y
PMk 13624
° ® m y M -V \ U
O O ND 1. \D ®g 8 �6g
\ 8 zw8� \ OX1 s:
e . m
Q CA
J Wnm� q�s
c
PM 17705 '37.96 92 D 4 4 Sf b i
0 ro
N N c ® o a e
n2.9L
0
mw^sc,o"E Tsf.ys PM 17705 N]f • /]• /L'E zts.0/ y1
tv
CONDM ED
o DOC85- 016 642 �' o •VA r : D' :. N_ O `vl. -G N "V
W _ N'
S W (SEE StiT.3 . 1 Y °. +, m
rn
m y vy D N- N OA
l!1 a N x O y PO r' (' 5/1612003 RMN
p W N p _
fn\ N 4 N O W D. N.
p �` [.D'ii....�. RANGE
y HLX OLD I WWtA CUT
U/ 23 72(73 74 62f7
s$ ME 7 SS'l
O38741 74-76 76 775
D 74 76 7 7 71 787
('
O _ CO -f-? 78 :'9 7 15
CCP so 4,15. 'B2 y8 3079
/•r M 1776 4 9396 B° 1147
Ln.6c M12304 lug 28 87e8a 83 2153
TM !o8 69M B4 2933
2033
yam+ to cc
230a z 7 7 < 121.61 PM = n 1776 y 16846 A 95 NOM be sac
d w W N cc
® CO cONOH 89 704
r N 321 2 IS tr...r. '
W 321 %em "us -zl .
• • • /a5 S` 'v] . csi � P'• IL.B/ )117 /6'3SE � r
•'e 10 - "(1 7163 /7r 321 7E99 -Ws?. 92 1698
o o ® O O 325 VAC 92 1001
$ v s 3
° p `o 325 i s &.o 93 46 z1
0
325 3$ 61 Q by 97 1031
.v ]air'.s'E Nslit.tvt
_ PM 1e34 n3 R /oa s7. a'7a w,r •,v+CE $$ 325 21 63864 00 1661
t ••� tsi
tw v ' ; \ N /v ]e 325 20863 65 W '
4 N
Ny c b O Nt N 325 18851 66867 ('
66 -7r
n� �a Y ]• "]'Zir v. ]f,!
73X 325 67
9o.YS N 4 > ; O V
N
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
Fidelity National Title Company
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: l�f
229 -23 L
� Coat Blvd., Inc..
�w 5i I14 YO , u
Arr' : (VI �4tRtU15
APN: 254- 325 - 43/44/45
Escrow No: 03008520- 937 -SL2
)OC 2007 - 0711428
lillill illl illll 11111 IIIIIIIII Ilill IIIiI 1111111111 illll Ilill 1111 illl
NOV 08, 2007 3:30 PM
OFFIGA.L RECORDS
SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE
GREGORYJ SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER
FEES. 3777.50
OC OC
PAGES: 2
11111111 NI!I VIII dill Ili VIII Illli YIII11111 INII 11111 IN IIIII IIII Ili
Spac
7207 GRANT DEED
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(S) DECLARC(S)
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS $3.767.50
0 computed on full value of property conveyed, OR
O computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale
O unincorporated area 0 City of Encinitas, AND
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Jed L. Staley, an unmarried man
hereby GRANT(S) to 229 -231 COAST BLVD., INC., A California Corporation
the following described real property in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California:
COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS MARKED EXHIBIT W ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HERE.
Commonly known as: 1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue, Encinitas, CA 92024
Dated: July 9. 2007
COUNTY OF
On
personally known to
subscribed to the wi
WITNESS my hand
Signature
} SS:
'(bf proved to me on
instrument and ackno
y his /her /their �tgnatt
J the instfumen/.
aim
-wa, - ,* 57n1£ m w is ,
$a ,e fts &cu (
me, ✓ Notary Public,
tesis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are
ad to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized
on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP
r SUZETTELAU
V
y
COMM. p 1655389
NOTARY PUBUC CA!1FORNIA
SAN DIEGO COUNTY n
COMM. E SRES APRIL 27, 2010 '�
Order No. 07- 2951052
EXHIBIT nzmr—' 7208
Parcel A
All Lots 9, 10 and 11 of Block 4 of South Coast Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of
San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of
the County Recorder of San Diego County, January 11, 1924.
Excepting therefrom the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lots 9 and 10 and the Southerly 60.00
feet of the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lot 11 thereof.
Parcel B:
Lot 10 in Block 4 of South Coast Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State
of California, according to Map thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, January 11, 1924.
Excepting therefrom that portion of Lot 10 shown in Parcel A in that certain Document
entitled Certificate of Compliance recorded January 19, 1978 as File No. 78- 024670of
Official Records.
Parcel C:
The Southerly 60.00 feet of the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lot 11 in Block 4 of South Coast
Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map
thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, January
11, 1924.
Assessor's Parcel No: 254 - 325 -43, 254 - 325 -45 and 254- 325 -44
2 (Rev. 1 111 7/04)
oFidelity National Title Company
PRELIMINARY REPORT
In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Fidelity National
Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date
hereof, a policy or policies of title insurance describing the land and the estate or interest
therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any
defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an exception herein or not excluded
from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions
of said policy forms.
The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks
ofsaid policy orpolicies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain
an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the
arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company
or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable
to the CL TA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible
Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in
Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the
office which issued this report.
This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of
facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it
is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder
or Commitment should be requested.
The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Fidelity National Title
Insurance Company, a California corporation.
Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set
forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to
provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title
insurance policy and should be carefully considered.
It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the
condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the
land.
�. ountersign
Fidelity National Title Company
.,a -....,
BY ,
'' SEAL \G � °�ssieem
ATTEST
Se Veldly
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified 111/17/061
IIII Fidelity National Title Company
r�
2763 Camino Del Rio South • San Diego, CA 92108
(619) 295 -7332 • FAX (619) 297 -2213
PRELIMINARY REPORT
ORDER NO.: 08- 4053312
TITLE OFFICER: Frank Gregory /Denisa Kirchoff
LOAN NO.:
TO: Kevin Stephens
ATTN: Kevin
YOUR REFERENCE.: Hermes
SHORT TERM RATE: Yes
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1007 Hermes Avenue #21, 1019 Hermes Avenue, 1011 Hermes
Avenue, Encinitas, California
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 13, 2008, 07:30 A.M.
The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is:
California Land Title Association Standard Coverage Policy - 1990
1 . THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED
TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS:
A Fee
2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN:
229 -231 Coast Blvd., Inc., a California corporation
3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
SEE EXHIBIT "ONE" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
JC \SR 12/02/2008
1 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11117106)
Order No. 08- 4053312
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT "ONE"
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
Parcel A:
All Lots 9, 10 and 11 of Block 4 of South Coast Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of San
Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County, January 11, 1924.
Excepting therefrom the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lots 9 and 10 and the Southerly 60.00 feet
of the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lot 11 thereof.
Parcel B:
Lot 10 in Block 4 of South Coast Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State
of California, according to Map thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of the County Recorder
of San Diego County, January 11, 1924.
Excepting therefrom that portion of Lot 10 shown in Parcel A in that certain Document entitled
Certificate of Compliance recorded January 19, 1978 as File No. 78- 024670 of Official
Records.
Parcel C
The Southerly 60.00 feet of the Westerly 145.00 feet of Lot 11 in Block 4 of South Coast
Park, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map
thereof No. 1776, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, January
11, 1924.
Assessors Parcel No. 254 - 325 - 43,254- 325 -44 and 254 - 325 -45
2 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11117/06)
Order No. 08- 4053312
AT THE DATE HEREOF, ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AND EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN
ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD
BE AS FOLLOWS:
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs,
attorneys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of:
(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing
authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records, (b)
proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of
such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public
Records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that
could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in
possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting
the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and
not shown by the Public Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims, (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts
authorizing the issuance thereof, (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not
the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records.
6. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with
taxes, for the fiscal year 2008 -2009, Assessor's Parcel Number 254- 325 -43.
Code Area Number
1st Installment:
2nd Installment:
Land:
Improvements:
Exemption:
Personal Property:
19317
$1 1,930.94 Open
$1 1,930.94 Open
$1,735,000.00
$440,000.00
$None
$None
3 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11117106)
ITEMS: (Continued) Order No. 08- 4053312
7. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with
taxes, for the fiscal year 2008 -2009, Assessor's Parcel Number 254- 325 -44.
E
E
10.
11
12
Code Area Number
1st Installment:
2nd Installment:
Land:
Improvements:
Exemption:
Personal Property:
19084
$2,977.12 Open
$2,977.12 Open
$510,000.00
$40,000.00
$None
$None
Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with
taxes, for the fiscal year 2008 -2009, Assessor's Parcel Number 254- 325 -45.
Code Area Number:
1st Installment:
2nd Installment:
Land:
Improvements:
Exemption:
Personal Property:
19317
$4,176.21 Open
$4,176.21 Open
$ 560,000.00
$ 140,000.00
$None
$None
The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5
(Commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation code of the State of
California.
Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a
document;
Granted to:
Pacific Bell, a California Corporation
Purpose:
Public utilities
Recorded:
June 26, 1985, Instrument No. 85- 228050, of Official Records
Affects:
Parcel B
Reference is made to said document for full particulars.
A Document entitled "Resolution Annexing Territory to San Diego County Lighting
Maintenance District" recorded April 3, 1986 as File No. 86- 129046 of Official Records.
Affects:
Parcels A, B and C
Any facts, rights, interests or claims which may exist or arise by reason of the following
matters disclosed by an inspection or survey: The fact that mail boxes for this property
have been attached to the adjoining property owner's garage.
The fact that a Cable T.V. riser lies along the Southerly line of Lot 10 herein.
The rights of the public (if any) for ingress and egress as evidenced by a Pedestrian Gate
located along the Northerly boundary of said property.
A "Notice of Permit Application" dated 10 -18 -05 has been posted on said property in
regard to the construction of 10 single family residential structures.
4 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11117106)
ITEMS: (Continued) Order No. 08- 4053312
13. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other
obligations secured thereby
Amount: $2,000,000.00
Dated: October 24, 2007
Trustor: 229 -231 Coast Blvd., Inc., a California corporation
Trustee: Temecula Valley Bank
Beneficiary: Temecula Valley Bank
Loan No.: 58010195
Recorded: November 8, 2007, Instrument No. 2007- 0711429, of Official
Records
14. This Company will require the following documents for review prior to the issuance of any
title assurance predicated upon a conveyance or encumbrance by the corporation named
below.
Corporation: 229 -231 Coast Blvd., Inc.,
(a) A copy of the corporation By -Laws and Articles of Incorporation.
(b) An original or certified copy of the Resolution authorizing the
transaction contemplated herein.
(c) If the Articles and /or By -Laws require approval by a "parent"
organization, a copy of the Articles and By -Laws of the parent.
The right is reserved to add requirements or additional items after completion of such
review.
15. This company will require a statement of information from the parties named below in
order to complete this report, based on the effect of documents, proceedings, liens,
decrees, or other matters which do not specifically describe said land, but which, if any
do exist, may affect the title or impose liens or encumbrances thereon. After review of the
requested Statement(s) of Information the Company may have additional requirements
before the issuance of any policy of title insurance.
Parties: The Buyers in this Transaction
(Note: The statement of information is necessary to complete the search and examination
of title under this order. Any title search includes matters that are indexed by name only,
and having a completed statement of information assists the Company in the elimination
of certain matters which appear to involve the parties but in fact affect another party with
the same or similar name. Be assured that the statement of information is essential and
will be kept strictly confidential to this file).
END OF ITEMS
Note 1. The charge for a policy of title insurance, when issued through this title order, will be
based on the Short Term Rate.
5 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified 111/17/06)
ITEMS: (Continued)
Note 2. If property taxes are posted paid less than 45 days from the issuance of the policy
contemplated by this report, the Company will hold the amount of the tax, plus
delinquency and penalty until verification of payment is received. If verification has not
been received within 45 days of the issuance of the policy contemplated, the Company
will pay the taxes due. If property taxes have been paid through an impound account and
we are furnished written confirmation of same or you can provide a copy of the canceled
check, this requirement may be waived.
If a monthly payment for any deed of trust to be paid in full is made
less than 30 days from the issuance of the policy contemplated by this report, the
Company will hold an amount equal to that payment until verification of payment is
received from the lender. If verification has not been received within 30 days of the
issuance of the policy contemplated, the funds held will be forwarded to the lender. If a
canceled check or other form of proof of payment can be furnished, this requirement may
be waived.
Note 3. NOTE: Amended Civil Code Section 2941, which becomes effective on January 1, 2002,
sets the fee for the processing and recordation of the reconveyance of each Deed of Trust
being paid off through this transaction at $45.00. The reconveyance fee must be clearly
set forth in the Beneficiary's Payoff Demand Statement ( "Demand "). In addition, an
assignment or authorized release of that fee, from the Beneficiary to the Trustee of record,
must be included. An example of the required language is as follows:
"The Beneficiary identified above hereby assigns, releases or transfers to the Trustee of
record, the sum of $45.00, included herein as "Reconveyance Fees ", for the processing
and recordation of the Reconveyance of the Deed of Trust securing the indebtedness
covered hereby, and the escrow company or title company processing this pay -off is
authorized to deduct the Reconveyance Fee from this Demand and forward said fee to the
Trustee of record or the successor Trustee under the Trust Deed to be paid off in full."
In the event that the reconveyance fee and the assignment, release or transfer thereof are
not included within the demand statement, then Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
and its Underwritten Agent may decline to process the reconveyance and will be forced
to return all documentation directly to the Beneficiary for compliance with the requirements
of the revised statute.
Note 4. If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate broker, real
estate agent or association provides a copy of a declaration, governing document or deed
to any person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement
regarding any unlawful restrictions. Said statement is to be in at least 14 -point bold face
type and may be stamped on the first page of any document provided or included as a
cover page attached to the requested document. Should a party to this transaction
request a copy of any document reported herein that fits this category, the statement is
to be included in the manner described.
Note 5. Wiring instructions for Fidelity National Title Company, San Diego, California, are follows:
Receiving Bank: Bank of America NT &SA, 333 South Beaudry Avenue, Los Angeles, CA
90017 -1466
Bank ABA No.: 026009593
Beneficiary: Fidelity National Title
Account No. 050 - 7916151
Reference Title Officer: Frank Gregory /Denisa Kirchoff
Title Order No. 4053312
These wiring instructions are for this specific transaction involving the title Department of
the San Diego office of Fidelity National Title. These instructions therefore should not be
used in other transactions without first verifying the information with our accounting
department. Its is imperative that the wire text be exactly as indicated. Any extraneous
information may cause unnecessary delays in confirming the receipt of funds.
Note 6. The current owner does NOT qualify for the $20.00 discount pursuant to the coordinated
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11!1 7/06)
ITEMS: (Continued)
Order No. 08- 4053312
stipulated judgments entered in actions filed by both the Attorney General and private
class action plaintiffs for the herein described property.
END OF NOTES
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified 01117106)
ATTACHMENT ONE
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6 -1 -87) EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not
insured againstloss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses
resulting from:
1. Governmental police power, and the existence or
violation of any law or government regulation. This
includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws
and regulations concerning:
• land use
• improvements on the land
• land division
• environmental protection
This exclusion does not apply to violations or the
enforcement of these matters which appear in the
public records at policy date.
This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage
described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks.
2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless:
• a notice of exercising the right appears in the
public records on the Policy Date
• the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and
is binding on you if you bought the land without
knowledge of the taking
In addition to the Exclusions, you are not insured against
loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and the expenses resulting
from:
1 . Any rights, interests, or claims of parties in possession
of the land not shown by the public records.
2. Any easements or liens not shown by the public
records. This does not limit the lien coverage in Item
8 of Covered Title Risks.
Title Risks:
• that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you
• that are known to you, but not to us, on the
Policy Date - unless they appeared in the public
records
• that result in no loss to you
• that first affect your title after the Policy Date -
this does not limit the labor and material lien
coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks
Failure to pay value for your title.
Lack of a right:
• to any land outside the area specifically described
and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A
or
• in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your
land
This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in
Item 5 of Covered Title Risks.
3. Any facts about the land which a correct survey
would disclose and which are not shown by the public
records. This does not limit the forced removal
coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks.
4. Any water rights or claims or title to water in or under
the land, whether or not shown by the public records.
Ali. hm.It One ;11;17/05)
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the
coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss
or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which
arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation
(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,
ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating,
prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or
enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions
or location of any improvement now or hereafter
erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or
a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any
parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv)
environmental protection, or the effect of any violation
of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations,
except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement
thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance
resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting
the land has been recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by
(a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the
exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or
encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise
thereof has been recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any
taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy
which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser
for value without knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, orother
matters:
(a) whether or not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or
agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy, but known to the
insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the
Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the
insured claimant became an insured under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured
claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy;
or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have
been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value
for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest
insured by this policy.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage
because of the inability or failure of the insured at
Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any
subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply
with the applicable doing business laws of the state in
which the land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured
mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the
transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is
based upon usury or any consumer credit protection
or truth in lending law.
6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting
in the insured the estate or interest insured by this
policy or the transaction creating the interest of the
insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal
bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors'
rights laws.
SCHEDULE 8, PART I
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses)
which arise by reason of:
PART I
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as
existing liens by the records of any taxing authority
that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by
the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices
of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the
records of such agency or by the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not
shown by the public records but which could be
ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may
be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof,
not shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in
area, encroachments, or any other facts which a
correct survey would disclose, and which are not
shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or
exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the
issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to
water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b), or (c) are shown by the public records.
Arwhmsnt On. n 1117106)
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10- 17 -92)
WITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT -FORM 1 COVERAGE
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the
coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss
or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise
by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation
(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,
ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating,
prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or
enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected
on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change
in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of
which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental
protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws,
ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the
extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from
a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has
been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a)
above, except to the extent that a notice of the
exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or
encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise
thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date
of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking
which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would
be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value
without knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other
matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the
insured claimant:
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy, but known to the
insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the
Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the
insured claimant became an insured under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured
claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy
(except to the extent that this policy insures the priority
of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory
lien for services, labor or material or to the extent
insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for
street improvements under construction or completed
at Date of Policy); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have
been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value
for the insured mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage
because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date
of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent
owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable
doing business laws of the state in which the land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured
mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the
transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is
based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or
truth in lending law.
6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or
the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services,
labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage)
arising from an improvement or work related to the land
which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to
Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by
proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured
mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has
advanced or is obligated to advance.
7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating
the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by
reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state
insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is
based on:
(i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured
mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or
fraudulent transfer; or
(ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured
mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine
of equitable subordination: or
(iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured
mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except
where the preferential transfer results from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser
for value or a judgement or lien creditor.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage.
In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy
will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses)
which arise by reason of:
Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing
liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies
taxes or assessments on real property or by the public
records. Proceedings by a public agency which may
result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of
such agency or by the public records.
Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not
shown by the public records but which could be
ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may
be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof,
not shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in
area, encroachments, or any other facts which a
correct survey would disclose, and which are not
shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or
exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the
issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to
water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b) or (c) are shown by the public records.
Anechmem One n 1/17/001
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED(
2006 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (06- 17 -06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the
coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay
loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that
arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental
regulation (including those relating to building and
zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating
to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any
improvement erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws,
ordinances, or governmental regulations. This
Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage
provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This
Exclusiont(b) does not modify or limit the coverage
provided under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered
Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other
matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the
Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the
Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the
Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the
Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the
Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured
Claimant;
loll attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy
(however, this does not modify or limit the coverage
provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have
been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value
for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage
because of the inability or failure of an Insured to
comply with applicable doing- business laws of the
state where the Land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the
lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the
transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is
based upon usury or any consumer credit protection
or truth -in- lending law.
6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal
bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors'
rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of
the Insured Mortgage, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in
Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy.
7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or
assessments imposed by governmental authority and
created or attaching between Date of Policy and the
date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public
Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the
coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b).
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage.
In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy
will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses)
that arise by reason of:
(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as
existing liens by the records of any taxing authority
that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by
the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency
that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of
such proceedings, whether or not shown by the
records of such agency or by the Public Records.
Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not
shown by the Public Records but that could be
ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may
be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof,
not shown by the Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation,
or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would
be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey
of the Land and not shown by the Public Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or
exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the
issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to
water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records.
AVU hminl Ong 11 If 171001
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED(
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10- 17 -92)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the
coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss
or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which
arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation
(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,
ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating,
prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or
enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions
or location of any improvement now or hereafter
erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or
a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any
parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv)
environmental protection, or the effect of any violation
of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations,
except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement
thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance
resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting
the land has been recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by
(a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the
exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or
encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise
thereof has been recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any
taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy
which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser
for value without knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other
matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the
insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy, but known to the
insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the
Company by the insured claimant prior to the date
the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured
claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy,
or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have
been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value
for the estate or interest insured by this policy.
4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting
in the insured the estate or interest insured by this
policy, by reason of the operation of federal
bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors'
rights laws, that is based on:
(i) the transaction creating the estate or interest
insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent
conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest
insured by this policy being deemed a preferential
transfer except where the preferential transfer results
from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser
for value or a judgement or lien creditor.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage.
In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy
will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses)
which arise by reason of:
Taxes or assessments which are not shown as
existing liens by the records of any taxing authority
that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by
the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices
of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the
records of such agency or by the public records.
Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not
shown by the public records but which could be
ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may
be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof,
not shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in
area, encroachments, or any other facts which a
correct survey would disclose, and which are not
shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or
exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the
issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to
water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b) or (c) are shown by the public records.
A".hmant Ona (11/17/06)
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
2006 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (06- 17 -06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the
coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay
loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that
arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental
regulation (including those relating to building and
zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating
to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any
improvement erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws,
ordinances, or governmental regulations. This
Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage
provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion
1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided
under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered
Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other
matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the
Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the
Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the
Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the
Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the
Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured
Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy
(however, this does not modify or limit the coverage
provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have
been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value
for the Title.
Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal
bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors'
rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as
shown in Schedule A, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in
Covered Risk 9 of this policy.
Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or
assessments imposed by governmental authority and
created or attaching between Date of Policy and the
date of recording of the deed or other instrument of
transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as
shown in Schedule A.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage.
In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy
will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses)
that arise by reason of:
(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as
existing liens by the records of any taxing authority
that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by
the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency
that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of
such proceedings, whether or not shown by the
records of such agency or by the Public Records.
Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not
shown by the Public Records but that could be
ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may
be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof,
not shown by the Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation,
or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would
be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey
of the Land and not shown by the Public Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or
exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the
issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to
water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records.
Attachment Om 11 1 /1 710 01
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10- 22 -03)
ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10- 22.03)
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule R, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses
resulting from:
1. Governmental police power, and the existence or
violation of any law or government regulation. This
includes ordinances, laws and regulations concerning:
a. building
b. zoning
c. Land use
d. improvements on Land
e. Land division
f, environmental protection
This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the
enforcement of these matters if notice of the violation or
enforcement appears in the Public Records at the Policy
Date.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in
Covered Risk 14, 15, 16, 17 or 24.
2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of
them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable
building codes. This Exclusion does not apply to
violations of building codes if notice of the violation
appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date.
3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless:
a. notice of exercising the right appears in the Public
Records at the Policy Date; or
b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is
binding on You if You bought the Land without
Knowing of the taking.
4. Risks:
a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You,
whether or not they appear in the Public Records;
b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to
Us, unless they appear in the Public Records at the
Policy Date;
c. that result in no loss to You; or
d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not
limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d,
22, 23, 24 or 25.
5. Failure to pay value for Your Title.
6. Lack of a right:
a. to any Land outside the area specifically described
and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and
b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in
Covered Risk 11 or 18.
LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS
Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as
follows:
For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of
Liability shown in Schedule A.
The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows:
Covered 1,00% of Policy
Risk 18: Amount
or
$ 2.500.00
(Whichever is less)
Our Maximum Dollar
Limit of Liability
$ 10.000.00
$ 25.000.00
$ 25,000.00
AVxhmem One 0 1117/00)
Your Deductible
Amount
Covered
1.00% of Policy
Risk 14:
Amount
or
S 2,500.0
(Whichever is less)
Covered
1.00% of Policy
Risk 15:
Amount
or
$ 5.000.00
(Whichever is less)
Covered
1.00% of Policy
Risk 16:
Amount
or
$ 5,000.00
(Whichever is less)
Covered 1,00% of Policy
Risk 18: Amount
or
$ 2.500.00
(Whichever is less)
Our Maximum Dollar
Limit of Liability
$ 10.000.00
$ 25.000.00
$ 25,000.00
AVxhmem One 0 1117/00)
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (10/13/01)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the
coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss
or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise
by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation
(including but not limited to zoning laws,
ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating,
prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or
enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character,
dimensions or location of any improvements now
or hereafter erected on the Land; (iii) a separation
in ownership or a change in the dimensions or
areas of the Land or any parcel of which the Land
is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection,
or the effect of any violation of these laws,
ordinances or governmental regulations, except to
the extent that a notice of the enforcement
thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or
encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the Land has been recorded in
the Public Records at Date of Policy. This
exclusion does not limit the coverage provided
under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this
policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by
(a) above, except to the extent that a notice of
the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or
encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the Land has been recorded in
the Public Records at Date of Policy. This
exclusion does not limit the coverage provided
under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this
policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise
thereof has been recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any
taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy
which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser
for value without Knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other
matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the
Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the
Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to
the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing
to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to
the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured
under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss damage to the Insured
Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy
(this paragraph does not limit the coverage
provided under Covered Risks 8, 16, 18, 19, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have
been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid
value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage
because of the inability or failure of the Insured at Date
of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent
owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable
doing business laws of the state in which the Land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the Insured
Mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the
transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is
based upon usury, except as provided in Covered Risk
27, or any consumer credit protection or truth in
lending law.
6. Real property taxes or assessments of any
governmental authority which become a lien on the
Land subsequent to Date of Policy. This exclusion does
not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 7,
8(e) and 26.
7. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of
priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to
advances or modifications made after the Insured has
Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no
longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by
this policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage
provided in Covered Risk B.
8. Lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as
to each and every advance made after Date of Policy,
and all interest charged thereon, over liens,
encumbrances and other matters affecting the title, the
existence of which are Known to the Insured at:
(a) The time of the advance; or
(b) The time a modification is made to the terms of the
Insured Mortgage which changes the rate of interest
charged, if the rate of interest is greater as a result of
the modification than it would have been before the
modification. This exclusion does not limit the
coverage provided in Covered Risk 8.
9. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion
thereof to have been constructed before, on or after
Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building
codes. This exclusion does not apply to violations of
building codes if notice of the violation appears in the
Public Records at Date of Policy.
A"whmem On& 111/17/001
Notice
You maybe entitled to receive a $20.00 discount on escrow services if you purchased, sold or refinanced residential
property in California between May 19, 1995 and November 1, 2002. If you had more than one qualifying
transaction, you may be entitled to multiple discounts.
If your previous transaction involved the same property that is the subject of your current transaction, you do not
have to do anything; the Company will provide the discount, provided you are paying for escrow or title services in
this transaction.
If your previous transaction involved property different from the property that is the subject of your current
transaction, you must - prior to the close of the current transaction - inform the Company of the earlier transaction,
provide the address of the property involved in the previous transaction, and the date or approximate date that the
escrow closed to be eligible for the discount.
Unless you inform the Company of the prior transaction on property that is not the subject of this transaction, the
Company has no obligation to conduct an investigation to determine if you qualify for a discount. If you provide the
Company information concerning a prior transaction, the Company is required to determine if you qualify for a
discount which is subject to other terms and conditions.
Effective through November 1, 2014
Effective Date: 511/2008
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
Privacy Statement
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ( "FNF ") respect the privacy and security of your
non - public personal information ( "Personal Information ") and protecting your Personal Information is
one of our top priorities. This Privacy Statement explains FNF's privacy practices, including how we
use the Personal Information we receive from you and from other specified sources, and to whom it
may be disclosed. FNF follows the privacy practices described in this Privacy Statement and, depending
on the business performed, FNF companies may share information as described herein.
Personal Information Collected
We may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:
• Information we receive from you on applications or other forms, such as your name, address, social
security number, tax identification number, asset information, and income information;
• Information we receive from you through our Internet websites, such as your name, address, email
address, Internet Protocol address, the website links you used to get to our websites, and your
activity while using or reviewing our websites;
• Information about your transactions with or services performed by us, our affiliates, or others, such
as information concerning your policy, premiums, payment history, information about your home
or other real property, information from lenders and other third parties involved in such transaction,
account balances, and credit card information; and
• Information we receive from consumer or other reporting agencies and publicly recorded
documents.
Disclosure of Personal Information
We may provide your Personal Information (excluding information we receive from consumer or other
credit reporting agencies) to various individuals and companies, as permitted by law, without obtaining
your prior authorization. Such laws do not allow consumers to restrict these disclosures. Disclosures
may include, without limitation, the following:
• To insurance agents, brokers, representatives, support organizations, or others to provide you with
services you have requested, and to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material
misrepresentation, or nondisclosure in connection with an insurance transaction;
• To third -party contractors or service providers for the purpose of determining your eligibility for an
insurance benefit or payment and /or providing you with services you have requested;
• To an insurance regulatory authority, or a law enforcement or other governmental authority, in a
civil action, in connection with a subpoena or a governmental investigation;
• To companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or to other financial institutions with
which we have joint marketing agreements and /or
• To lenders, lien holders, judgment creditors, or other parties claiming an encumbrance or an interest
in title whose claim or interest must be determined, settled, paid or released prior to a title or
escrow closing.
We may also disclose your Personal Information to others when we believe, in good faith, that such
disclosure is reasonably necessary to comply with the law or to protect the safety of our customers,
employees, or property and/or to comply with a judicial proceeding, court order or legal process.
Page 1 of 2
Effective Date: 5/1/2008
Disclosure to Affiliated Companies - We are permitted by law to share your name, address and facts
about your transaction with other FNF companies, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real
estate service providers to provide you with services you have requested, for marketing or product
development research, or to market products or services to you. We do not, however, disclose
information we collect from consumer or credit reporting agencies with our affiliates or others without
your consent, in conformity with applicable law, unless such disclosure is otherwise permitted by law.
Disclosure to Nonaffiliated Third Parties - We do not disclose Personal Information about our customers
or former customers to nonaffiliated third parties, except as outlined herein or as otherwise permitted
by law.
Confidentiality and Security of Personal Information
We restrict access to Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that
information to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural
safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard Personal Information.
Access To Personal Information/
Requests for Correction, Amendment, or Deletion of Personal Information
As required by applicable law, we will afford you the right to access your Personal Information, under
certain circumstances to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed, and request
correction or deletion of your Personal Information. However, FNF's current policy is to maintain
customers' Personal Information for no less than your state's required record retention requirements
for the purpose of handling future coverage claims.
For your protection, all requests made under this section must be in writing and must include your
notarized signature to establish your identity. Where permitted by law, we may charge a reasonable
fee to cover the costs incurred in responding to such requests. Please send requests to:
Chief Privacy Officer
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
601 Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Fl 32204
Changes to this Privacy Statement
This Privacy Statement may be amended from time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws.
When we amend this Privacy Statement, we will post a notice of such changes on our website. The
effective date of this Privacy Statement, as stated above, indicates the last time this Privacy Statement
was revised or materially changed.
Page 2 of 2
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
December 7, 2010
Kevin Stephens
KF Stephens, Inc.
1500 West 11' Avenue, Suite 24
Escondido, CA 92029
Subject: FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW
Proposed Ten (10) Lot Subdivision
Leucadia Grove
1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue
Encinitas, California
References: Please see page 3
Dear Mr. Stephens:
DEC g 2010
As requested, we have reviewed the project foundation plans, Pages 1 through 4, dated
November 16, 2010, prepared by Post - Tensioned Design Unlimited, and observed that they have,
in general, included the recommendations presented in our Preliminary and Updated Reports and
our conversations for the proposed post- tensioned slab.
COMMENTS
1) As per our conversations with Samuel Zundelevioch, P.E., the post- tensioned slab has
been revised for an allowable bearing value of 1700 pounds per square foot and the
perimeter footing has been deepened to a minimum of 12 inches below the lowermost
adjacent grade. A 2.0 inch clean sand blanket is adequate for this design.
779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075
(858) 755 -8622 • FAX (858) 755 -9126
Coast Geotechnical December 7, 2010
W.O. P- 470085
Page 2
2) All footings should be observed by an engineering geologist prior to the placement of
forms and steel.
3) Previous testing suggests that the Pleistocene soils reflect a negligible sulfate content. A
final water soluble sulfate California Test 417 will be conducted on pad soils at the
completion of rough grading.
LIMITATIONS
The findings and opinions presented herein have been made in accordance with generally
accepted professional principals in the fields of engineering geology and geotechnical
engineering. No warranty is expressed or implied.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact our office. Reference to our Job
No. P- 470085 will help expedite a response to your inquiry.
Respectfully submitted,
COAST GEOTECHNIE
ttaga 2109 r '01 ti �`�xp. 5/31 /1 Z � r j CERTIFIED + 7 82
PIGINEEAING * Vithainghanet, Exp.1231-1i
EOLAGIST��P Geotechnical Engin C>',pL c
Coast Geotechnical
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Proposed Ten (10) Lot Subdivision
1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue
Encinitas, California
Prepared by Coast Geotechnical
Dated October 3, 2005
2. GEOTECHNICAL UPDATE REPORT
Proposed Ten (10) Lot Subdivision
Leucadia Grove
1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue
Encinitas, California
Prepared by Coast Geotechnical
Dated August 10, 2010
December 7, 2010
W.O. P- 470085
Page 3
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
August 10, 2010
Kevin Stephens
KF Stephens, Inc.
1500 West 11' Avenue, Suite 24
Escondido, CA 92029
Subject: GEOTECHNICAL UPDATE REPORT
Proposed Ten (10) Lot Subdivision
Leucadia Grove
1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue
Encinitas, California
References: Please see page 4
Dear Mr. Stephens:
D[CE�WE
DEC s Arno
D
ENGINEERING SER4ICES
CITY OF ENCINITAS
A site review suggests that no significant changes to the property have occurred since the completion
of our Preliminary Geotechnical Report, dated October 3, 2005. This report updates the referenced
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for the current 2007 California Code requirements.
Removals Recompaction/Grading
Remedial grading will be necessary, as recommended in the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation.
Additional recommendations will be necessary based on actual conditions encountered.
Seismic Considerations
Although the likelihood of ground rupture on the site is remote, the property will be exposed to
779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075
(858) 755-8622 • FAX (858) 7559126
Coast Geotechnical
August 10, 2010
W.O. P- 470085
Page 2
moderate to high levels of ground motion resulting from the release of energy should an earthquake
occur along the numerous known and unknown faults in the region. The Rose Canyon Fault Zone
located approximately 3.0 miles west of the property is the nearest known active fault and is
considered the design earthquake for the site.
Seismic Design Parameters (2005 ASCE 7 Standard)
Site Class D
Ss: 1.366
S 1:0.514
Fa:1.0
Fv: 1.5
SMs: 1.366
SM 1: 0.770
SDs: 0.911
SDI: 0.514
Slabs on Grade (Interior)
We suggest that interior slabs on grade be increased from 4.0 inches thick to a minimum of 5.0
inches thick and reinforced in both directions with No. 3 bars placed 18 inches on center in both
directions. The slab should be underlain by a minimum 2.0 -inch sand blanket (S.E. greater than 30).
Where moisture sensitive floors are used, a minimum 6.0 -mil Visqueen or equivalent moisture
barrier should be placed over the sand blanket and covered by an additional two inches of sand.
All of the recommendations in the Preliminary Geotechnical Report which are not superceded by this
report remain applicable and should be implemented during the design and construction phases.
Coast Geotechnical
August 10, 2010
W.O. P470085
Page 3
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact our office. Reference to our Job No.
P470085 will help expedite a response to your inquiry.
Respectfully submitted,
COAST GEOTECHNU
Mark Burwell, C.E.G\
Engineering Geologist
2109
Exp. 5/31/1,1
CERTIFIED
ENGINEERING
,GEOLOGIST,
Enclosures: Regional Fault Map
Seismic Design Parameters
Design Response Spectrum
V thai
Geotechnical
�� \\
t�
782
Exp. 12 -31 -)1
Coast Geotechnical
August 10, 2010
W.O. P470085
Page 4
California Building Standards Commission, January 1, 2008, 2007 California Building Code,
California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2.
2. Coast Geotechnical, 2005, Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Ten (10) Lot
Subdivision, 1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue, Encinitas, California.
Petersen, Mark D. and others (DMG), Frankel, Arthur D. and others (USGS), 1996,
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California, California Division of
Mines and Geology OFR 96 -08, United States Geological Survey OFR 96 -706.
United States Geological Survey, 2007, Seismic Hazard Curves and Uniform Hazard
Response Spectra, Volume 5.0.8.
ENCLOSURES
150
100
50
0961
-50
-100
150
-200
-250
-300
5MIJ
-400
-450
CALIFORNIA FAULT MAP
SITE
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
STEPHENS
Conterminous 48 States
2005 ASCE 7 Standard
Latitude = 33.0668
Longitude = - 117.3006
Spectral Response Accelerations Ss and S
Ss and S1 = Mapped Spectral Acceleration Values
Site Class B - Fa = 1.0 ,Fv = 1.0
Data are based on a 0.009999999776482582 deg grid spacing
Period Sa
(sec) (g)
0.2 1.366 (Ss, Site Class B)
1.0 0.514 (S1, Site Class B)
Conterminous 48 States
2005 ASCE 7 Standard
Latitude = 33.0668
Longitude = - 117.3006
Spectral Response Accelerations SMs and SM1
SMs =Fax Ss and SMI =FvxSI
Site Class D - Fa = 1.0 ,Fv = 1.5
Period Sa
(sec) (g)
0.2 1.366 (SMs, Site Class D)
1.0 0.770 (SM1, Site Class D)
Conterminous 48 States
2005 ASCE 7 Standard
Latitude = 33.0668
Longitude = - 117.3006
Design Spectral Response Accelerations SDs and SDI
SDs = 2/3 x SMs and SDI = 2/3 x SMl
Site Class D - Fa = 1.0 ,Fv = 1.5
Period Sa
(sec) (g)
0.2 0.911 (SDs, Site Class D)
1.0 0.514 (SDI, Site Class D)
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
0.0
0.8
v
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0L
0
Sa (g) Vs T (sec)
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.9 1 11 1
T (sec)
ion. rEsTBtt
P.U. Box 1195
Lakeside, Califomia
92040
(619) 443-0060
December14, 2007
Lori Robinson
K. F. Stephens, Inc
1500 11 Avenue
Escondido, California 92029
SUBJECT: File No. 1147B4 -07
Update to Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Residential Building Site
1007 — 1021 Hermes Avenue
City of Encinitas
Dear Ms. Robinson:
In accordance with your request, this is to update the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
dated October 3, 2005, by Coast Geotechnical. Soil conditions appear to be the same as at the
time the aforementioned report was prepared. Recommendations therein are still considered
applicable for the proposed project. We have reviewed the previous report and agree with the
recommendations therein. We assume geotechnical responsibility for the preparation and
placement of the fill during grading per the previously referenced report and may be
considered the Soil Engineering Consultant of Record.
If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. This
opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated.
Respectfully submitted,
C. Smyth, RCE 21650
.(GSIss
cc: (3) submitted
COAST GrEOTECHNICAL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
'/e- v's coo pt/
October 3, 2005
Jed L. Staley
1106 2'd Street, Suite 120
Encinitas, CA 92024
Subject: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Proposed Ten (10) Lot Subdivision
1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue
Encinitas, California
Dear Mr. Staley:
In response to your request and in accordance with our Proposal and Agreement dated August 23,
2005, we have performed a preliminary geologic and soils engineering investigation on the subject
site for the proposed residential development.
The findings of the investigation, laboratory test results and recommendations for site development
and foundation design are presented in this report.
From a geologic and soils engineering point of view, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the
proposed development, provided the recommendations in this report are implemented during the
design and construction phases.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (858) 755 -8622. This opportunity
to be of service is appreciated.
Respectfully
COAST GEI
/'jAl)&
Mark Burwell,
Engineering G
2�'t3l1l jl..
r\ Ga•
210q 'r l r�
FXP.5v1 06
CERTIFIFt1
ENGINEEW10
r 795
V i:xp, t2•.
Vithaya inghanet "PIE-
1 a..
Geotechnical Engineer;;
779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOIANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075
(858) 755-8622 • FAX (858) 755 -9126
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Proposed Ten (10) Lot Subdivision
1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue
Encinitas, California
Prepared For:
Jed L. Staley
1106 2nd Street, Suite 120
Encinitas, CA 92024
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Prepared By:
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
779 Academy Drive
Solana Beach, California 92075
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VICINITY MAP
4
INTRODUCTION
5
SITE CONDITIONS
5
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
6
SITE INVESTIGATION
6
LABORATORY TESTING
7
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
8
CONCLUSIONS
11
RECOMMENDATIONS
12
A. REMOVALS/RECOMPACTION /GRADING
12
B. TEMPORARY SLOPES /EXCAVATION CHARACTERISTICS
13
C. FOUNDATIONS
13
D. SLABS ON GRADE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR)
14
E. RETAINING WALLS
15
F. SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS
15
G. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS
16
H. SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
16
I. UTILITY TRENCH
17
J. PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN
17
K. DRAINAGE
18
L. GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATIONS
18
M. PLAN REVIEW
19
LIMITATIONS
19
REFERENCES
21
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
BORING LOGS
CONCEPT PLAN
APPENDIX B REGIONAL FAULT MAP
SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM
APPENDIX C GRADING GUIDELINES
Coast Geotechnical
INTRODUCTION
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 5
This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation on the subject property. The
purpose of this study is to evaluate the nature and characteristics of the earth materials underlying
the property, the engineering properties of the surficial deposits and their influence on the proposed
residential development.
SITE CONDITIONS
The subject property is located north ofLeucadia Boulevard, along the east side of Hermes Avenue,
in the Leucadia district, city of Encinitas.
The subject property includes an L- shaped parcel of land of approximately one acre. The site slopes
gentlyto the west and includes several residential structures. The existing structures consist of single
family residences and multi -unit dwellings which enter from Hermes Avenue. The property is
bounded along the north, south and east by developed residential lots and along the west by Hennes
Avenue. Relief on the site is estimated to be about 5.0 vertical feet.
Vegetation consists of residential landscaping including grass, shrubs and several mature trees and
stumps. Drainage is generally by sheet flow to the west.
Coast Geotechnical
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 6
Preliminary concept plans for the development of the site were prepared by Sampo Engineering. The
project includes splitting the property into ten (10) separate lots. Each lot will accommodate a
single family residence with an attached garage. Access will be provided by a private street which
enters from Hermes Avenue, a cull -de -sac and a private driveway. It is assumed that lot
development will be at or near the existing grade. Only minor grading is anticipated. The existing
residences and accessory units will be demolished.
SITE INVESTIGATION
Two (2) exploratory borings were drilled to a maximum depth of 20 feet with a hollow -stem drill
rig. Four (4) exploratory borings were drilled to a maximum depth of 14 feet with a portable auger
drill in less accessible areas of the site. Earth materials encountered were visually classified and
logged by our field engineering geologist. Standard penetration tests (SPT) were performed in the
hollow -stem boring. Undisturbed, representative samples of earth materials were obtained at
selected intervals. Samples were obtained by driving a thin walled steel sampler into the desired
strata. The samples are retained in brass rings of 2.5 inches outside diameter and 1.0 inches in
height. The central portion of the sample is retained in close fitting, waterproof containers and
transported to our laboratory for testing and analysis.
Coast Geotechnical
LABORATORY TESTING
Classification
October 3, 2005
W.O. P-470085
Page 7
The field classification was verified through laboratory examination, in accordance with the Unified
Soil Classification System. The final classification is shown on the enclosed Exploratory Logs.
Moisture/Density
The field moisture content and dry unit weight were determined for each of the undisturbed soil
samples. This information is useful in providing a gross picture of the soil consistency or variation
among exploratory excavations. The dry unit weight was determined in pounds per cubic foot. The
field moisture content was determined as a percentage of the dry unit weight. Both are shown on
the enclosed Laboratory Tests Results and Exploratory Logs.
Maximum Dry Density /Optimum Moisture Content
The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were determined for selected samples of
earth materials taken from the site. The laboratory standard tests were in accordance with ASTM
D- 1557 -91. The results of the tests are presented in the enclosed Laboratory Test Results.
Shear Test
Shear tests were performed in a strain - control type direct shear machine. The rate of deformation
was approximately 0.025 inches per minute. Each sample was sheared under varying confining loads
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 8
in order to determine the Coulomb shear strength parameters, cohesion and angle of internal friction.
Samples were tested in a saturated condition. The results are presented in the Laboratory Test
Results.
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
The subject property is located in the Coastal Plains Physiographic Province of San Diego county
and is underlain at relatively shallow depths by Pleistocene -age terrace deposits. The Pleistocene
sands are underlain at depth by Eocene -age sedimentary rocks of the Torrey sandstone interfingered
with the Santiago Formation. The Pleistocene deposits are covered by residual soil and minor
isolated fill deposits. A brief description of the earth materials observed on the site is discussed
below.
Artificial Fill
No evidence of significant fill deposits were observed on the site. Minor fill deposits are present in
and around the existing structures and site walls, and are composed of locally derived fine and
medium - grained sand.
Soil
Considerable variation occurs within the depth of soil. Approximately 1.0 to 6.0 feet of brown silty,
fine and medium - grained sand was encountered in the exploratory borings. The soil is generally
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 9
moist and loose. The contact with the underlying terrace deposits is gradational and the depth of soil
will vary across the site.
Terrace Deposits
Underlying the surficial materials, Pleistocene terrace deposits are present. The sediments are
composed of tan to reddish brown weakly cemented, fine and medium - grained sand. The upper 2.0
to 3.0 feet of the sedimentary unit is generally loose and weathered. Some degree of lateral variation
within the sedimentary unit occurs and the depth of weathered sediments will vary across the site.
Below the weathered zone, the terrace deposits become increasingly dense. Regionally, the
Pleistocene sands are considered flat -lying and are underlain by Eocene -age sedimentary rock units.
Expansive Soil
Based on our experience in the area and previous laboratory testing of selected samples, the soil and
terrace deposits reflect an expansion potential in the very low range.
Groundwater
Seepage was encountered at depths ranging from 8.8 feet to 12 feet, in Boring Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 6r
The seepage appears to be perched, in part, above dense terrace deposits encountered at a depth of
12 to 13 feet. It should be noted that seepage problems can develop after completion of construction.
These seepage problems most often result from drainage alterations, landscaping and over - irrigation.
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 10
In the event that seepage or saturated ground does occur, it has been our experience that they are
most effectively handled on an individual basis.
Tectonic Setting
The site is located within the seismically active southern California region which is generally
characterized by northwest trending Quaternary -age fault zones. Several of these fault zones and
fault segments are classified as active by the California Division of Mines and Geology (Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act).
Based on a review of published geologic maps, no known faults transverse the site. The nearest
active fault is the offshore Rose Canyon Fault Zone located approximately 3.0 miles west of the site.
It should be noted that the Rose Canyon Fault is not a continuous, well- defined feature but rather a
zone of right stepping en echelon faults. The complex series of faults has been referred to as the
Offshore Zone of Deformation (Woodward-Clyde, 1979) and is not fully understood. Several studies
suggest that the Newport - Inglewood and the Rose Canyon faults are a continuous zone of en echelon
faults (Treiman, 1984). Further studies along the complex offshore zone of faulting may indicate
a potentially greater seismic risk than current data suggests. Other faults which could affect the site
include the Coronado Bank, Elsinore, San Jacinto and San Andreas Faults. The proximity of major
faults to the site and site parameters are shown on the enclosed Earthquake Fault Analysis.
Coast Geotechnical
LandslidinQ
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 11
No landslides have been mapped on the site or in the immediate vicinity of the property. Due to the
low topographic relief, the potential for landsliding is considered low to nonexistent.
Liquefaction Potential
Liquefaction is a process by which a sand mass loses its shearing strength completely and flows. The
temporary transformation of the material into a fluid mass is often associated with ground motion
resulting from an earthquake.
Owing to the moderately dense nature of the underlying Pleistocene sands and the anticipated depth
to ground water, the potential for seismically induced liquefaction and soil instability is considered
low.
CONCLUSIONS
1) The subject property is located in an area that is relatively free of potential geologic hazards
such as landsliding, liquefaction, and seismically induced subsidence.
2) The existing fill, soil and weathered terrace deposits are unsuitable for the support of
foundations, concrete flatwork or proposed fills in their present condition. The existing fill,
soil and weathered terrace deposits should be removed and replaced as properly compacted
fill for the support of proposed foundations, concrete flatwork or proposed fills. Significant
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 12
variations in the depth of soil occurs across the site. ,Additional recommendations will be
necessary during the remedial grading phase.
3) Care should be exercised by the grader in removals adjacent to the existing property lines and
adjacent structures. A minimum 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) temporary slope should be
provided adjacent to property lines where structures may be affected. Additional
recommendations may be necessary based on a review of the proposed grading plans.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Removals/Recompaction/Gradine
Prior to placement of proposed fills, the existing fill, soil and weathered terrace deposits should be
removed and replaced as properly compacted fill. 4.omovals_are estimated to be on the order of 4.0,
to 7.0 feet. However, additional depth of removal maybe required depending upon actual conditions
revealed during grading. Removals should include the entire building pad extending a minimum
of 5.0 feet beyond the building footprint. The existing earth deposits are generally suitable for reuse,
provided they are cleaned of all roots, vegetation, debris and rocks larger than 6.0 inches, and
thoroughly mixed. Fill should be placed in 6.0 to 8.0 inch loose lifts, moistened as required to 1.0-
2.0 percent above optimum moisture, and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory
maximum dry density. Fill slopes should be constructed at a maximum gradient of 2:1 (horizontal
to vertical). Additional recommendations will be presented should any unforeseen conditions be
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 13
encountered during grading. Fill, soil and weathered terrace deposits in areas of proposed concrete,
exterior improvements and driveway should be removed and replaced as properly compacted fill.
Imported fill should be composed of nonexpansive granular deposits approved by the geotechnical
engineer.
Temporary Slopes/Excavation Characteristics
Temporary excavations which exceed a vertical height of 3.5 feet should be trimmed to a gradient
of 3/4:1 (horizontal to vertical) or less. Based on our experience, the terrace deposits are rippable
with conventional heavy grading equipment in good working order. Care should be exercised in
removals adjacent to the existing property lines where adjacent structures are present. A 1:1
(horizontal to vertical) temporary slope should be provided adjacent to property lines where adjacent
structures are in close proximity. Additional recommendations will be necessary during grading, in
this regard.
Foundations
The following design parameters are based on an anticipated expansion potential in the low range.
Footings for the proposed residences and garages should be a minimum of 12 inches wide and
founded a minimum of 12 and 18 inches below the lower most adjacent grade at the time of
foundation construction for single -story and two -story structures, respectively. A 12 inch by 12 inch
grade beam should be placed across garage openings. The base of footings should be maintained
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 14
a minimum of 10.0 lateral feet from the edge of the nearest slope. Footings should be reinforced
with a minimum of two No. 4 bars, one along the top of the footing and one along the base. Footing
recommendations provided herein are based upon underlying soil conditions and are not intended
to be in lieu of the project structural engineer's design.
For design purposes, an allowable bearing value of 1700 and 2000 pounds per square foot may be
used for foundations at the recommended footing depths for single story and two story structures,
respectively.
The bearing value indicated above is for the total dead and frequently applied live loads. This value
may be increased by 33 percent for short durations of loading, including the effects of wind and
seismic forces.
Resistance to lateral load may be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by
passive earth pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used with dead -load forces. A
passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth of approved fill penetrated
to a maximum of 2500 pounds per square foot may be used.
Slabs on Grade (Interior and Exteriorl
Slabs on grade should be a minimum of 4.0 inches thick and reinforced in both directions with No.
3 bars placed 18 inches on center in both directions. The slab should be underlain by a minimum
2.0 -inch sand blanket (S.E. greater than 30). Where moisture sensitive floors are used, a minimum
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 15
6.0 -mil Visqueen or equivalent moisture barrier should be placed over the sand blanket and covered
by an additional two inches of sand. Utility trenches underlying the slab maybe backfilled with on-
site materials, compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. Slabs
including exterior concrete flatwork should be reinforced as indicated above and provided with saw
cuts /expansion joints, as recommended by the project structural engineer. All slabs should be cast
over dense compacted subgrades.
Retaining Walls
The following soil parameters may be used in the design of new walls. Cantilever walls (yielding)
retaining nonexpansive granular soils may be designed for an active - equivalent fluid pressure of 35
pounds per cubic foot. Restrained walls (nonyielding) should be designed for an "at- rest" equivalent
fluid pressure of 58 pounds per cubic foot. Wall footings should be designed in accordance with the
foundation design recommendations. All retaining walls should be provided with an adequate
backdrainage system (Miradrain 6000 or equivalent is suggested). The soil parameters assume a
level granular backfill compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry
density.
Settlement Characteristics
Estimated total and differential settlement over a horizontal distance of 30 feet is expected to be on
the order of % inch and %2 inch, respectively. It should also be noted that long term secondary
settlement due to irrigation and loads imposed by structures is anticipated to be'' /. inch.
Coast Geotechnical
Seismic Considerations
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 16
Although the likelihood of ground rupture on the site is remote, the property will be exposed to
moderate to high levels of ground motion resulting from the release of energy should an earthquake
occur along the numerous known and unknown faults in the region.
The Rose Canyon Fault Zone is the nearest known active fault, located approximately 3.0 miles west
of the property, and is considered the design earthquake for the site. A maximum probable event
along the offshore segment of the Rose Canyon Fault is expected to produce a peak bedrock
horizontal acceleration of 0.45g and a repeatable ground acceleration of 0.30g.
Seismic Design Parameters (1997 Uniform Building Code)
Soil Profile Type - Sp
Seismic Zone - 4
Seismic Source - Type B
Near Source Factor (N„) - 1.2
Near source Acceleration Factor (N,) - 1.0
Seismic Coefficients
C. = 0.44
C,. = 0.78
Design Response Spectrum
T, = 0.699
To = 0.140
Nearest Type B Fault - 4.9 km
Coast Geotechnical
Utility Trench
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 17
We recommend that all utilities be bedded in clean sand to at least one foot above the top of the
conduit. The bedding should be flooded in place to fill all the voids around the conduit. Imported
or on -site granular material compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction may be utilized for
backfill above the bedding.
The invert of subsurface utility excavations paralleling footings should be located above the zone
of influence of these adjacent footings. This zone of influence is defined as the area below a 45
degree plane projected down from the nearest bottom edge of an adjacent footing. This can be
accomplished by either deepening the footing, raising the invert elevation of the utility, or moving
the utility or the footing away from one another.
Preliminary Pavement Design
Previous testing by this firm in the vicinity of the site suggests an R -value of 43 for Pleistocene
sands. The following pavement design is the minimum city standard but may need to be revised
based on actual conditions encountered during grading.
4.0 inches of asphaltic paving or 5.0 inches of concrete on
6.0 inches of select base (Class 2) on
12 inches of compacted subgrade soils
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P-470085
Page 18
Subgrade soils should be compacted to the thickness indicated in the structural section and left in
a condition to receive base materials. Class 2 base materials should have a minimum R -value of 78
and a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Subgrade soils and base materials should be compacted to
a minimum of 95 percent of their laboratory maximum dry density.
The pavement section should be protected from water sources. Migration of water into subgrade
deposits and base materials could result in pavement failure.
Drainage
Specific drainage patterns should be designed by the project architect or engineer. However, in
general, pad water should be directed away from foundations and around the structure to the street.
Roof water should be collected and conducted to hardscape or the street, via non - erodible devices.
Pad water should not be allowed to pond or flow onto slopes. Vegetation adjacent to foundations
should be avoided. If vegetation in these areas is desired, sealed plantei boxes or drought resistant
plants should be considered. Other alternatives may be available, however, the intent is to reduce
moisture from migrating into foundation subsoils. Irrigation should be limited to that amount
necessary to sustain plant life. All drainage systems should be inspected and cleaned annually, prior
to winter rains.
Geotechnical Observations
Structural footing .excavations should be observed by a representative of this firm, prior to the
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 19
placement of steel and forms. All fill should be placed while a representative of the geotechnical
engineer is present to observe and test.
Plan Review
A copy of the final plans should be submitted to this office for review prior to the initiation of
construction. Additional recommendations may be necessary at that time.
LIMITATIONS
This report is presented with the provision that it is the responsibility of the owner or the owner's
representative to bring the information and recommendations given herein to the attention of the
project's architects and/or engineers so that they may be incorporated into plans.
If conditions encountered during construction appear to differ from those described in this report,
our office should be notified so that we may consider whether modifications are needed. No
responsibility for construction compliance with design concepts, specifications or recommendations
given in this report is assumed unless on -site review is performed during the course of construction.
The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure described herein are
based on individual exploratory excavations made on the subject property. The subsurface
conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure discussed should in no way be
construed to reflect any variations which may occur among the exploratory excavations.
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 20
Please note that fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall,
temperature and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made and reported herein.
Coast Geotechnical assumes no responsibility for variations which may occur across the site.
The conclusions and recommendations of this report apply as of the current date. In time, however,
changes can occur on a property whether caused by acts of man or nature on this or adjoining
properties. Additionally, changes in professional standards may be brought about by legislation or
the expansion of knowledge. Consequently, the conclusions and recommendations of this report
may be rendered wholly or partially invalid by events beyond our control. This report is therefore
subject to review and should not be relied upon after the passage of two years.
The professional judgments presented herein are founded partly on our assessment of the technical
data gathered, partly on our understanding of the proposed construction and partly on our general
experience in the geotechnical field. However, in no respect do we guarantee the outcome of the
project.
This study has been provided solely for the benefit of the client and is in no way intended to benefit
or extend any right or interest to any third party. This study is not to be used on other projects or
extensions to this project except by agreement in writing with Coast Geotechnical.
Coast Geotechnical October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 21
REFERENCES
1. Hays, Walter W., 1980, Procedures for Estimating Earthquake Ground Motions, Geological
Survey Professional Paper 1114, 77 pages.
Petersen, Mark D. and others (DMG), Frankel, Arthur D. and others (USGS), 1996,
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California, California Division of
Mines and Geology OFR 96 -08, United States Geological Survey OFR 96 -706.
Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M., 1970, A Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction
Potential: Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
4. Tan, S.S., and Giffen, D.G., 1995, Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego
Metropolitan Area, San Diego County, Plate 35D, Open -File Report 95 -04, Map Scale
1:24,000.
5. Treiman, J.A., 1984, The Rose Canyon Fault Zone, A Review and Analysis, California
Division of Mines and Geology.
MAPS /AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Aerial Photograph, 1982, Foto -Map D -9, Scale 1 "= 2000'.
2. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1994, Fault Activity Map of California, Scale
1 "= 750,000'.
Geologic Map of the Encinitas and Rancho Santa Fe 7.5' Quadrangles, 1996, DMG Open
File Report 96 -02.
Sampo Engineering, 2005, Concept Plan, 1007 -1021 Hennes Avenue, Leucadia, California,
Scale 1 " =30'.
U.S.G.S., 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Topographic Map, Encinitas, Digitized, Variable Scale.
APPENDIX A
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
TABLE I
Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content
(Laboratory Standard ASTM D- 1557 -91)
Sample Max. Dry Optimum
Location Density Moisture Content
(pcf)
B -1 @ 1.0' -4.0' 126.2 10.2
TABLE II
Field Dry Density and Moisture Content
Sample
Field Dry
Field Moisture
Location
Density
Content
cf
$
B -1 @
4.0'
112.9
7.8
B -1 @
5.0'
SPT
7.8
B -1 @
8.0'
102.5
8.8
B -1 @
9.0'
SPT
8.2
B -1 @
12.0'
102.5
18.2
B -1 @
13.0'
SPT
16.7
2-1 @
16.0'
SPT
25.0
B -1 @
19.0'
SPT
25.9
B -2 @
4.0'
99.4
6.3
B -2 @
5.0'
SPT
6.3
B -2 @
8.0'
112.3
15.4
B -2 @
9.0'
SPT
18.2
B -2 @
13.0'
SPT
25.1
B -2 @
16.0'
SPT
24.2
B -3 @
2.0'
97.9
8.3
B -3 @
4.0'
97.4
10.7
B -3 @
6.0'
113.1
12.5
B -3 @
8.0'
101.3
11.9
B -3 @
10.0'
104.0
18.1
(Page 1 of 2)
TABLE II(Continued)
Field Dry Density and Moisture Content
Sample
Field Dry
Field Moisture
Location
Density
Content
(Dcf)
%
B -4 @ 2.0'
103.5
8.5
B -4 @ 4.0'
97.6
8.1
B -4 @ 6.0'
88.4
7.5
B -4 @ 8.0'
98.4
6.3
B -4 @ 10.0'
Lost Sample
B -5 @ 2.0'
113.4
9.0
B -5 @ 4.0'
104.6
9.3
B -5 @ 6.0'
100.7
9.3
B -5 @ 8.0'
98.3
10.3
B -6 @ 2.0'
98.3
5.6
B -6 @ 5.0'
106.4
6.4
B -6 @ 7.5'
Lost Sample
B -6 @ 10.0'
101.0
7.8
TABLE III
Direct Shear Test Results
Sample Location Angle of Apparent Cohesion
Internal Friction 0 sf
B -1 @ 1.0' -4.0' 30 Degrees 120
(Remolded)
P- 470085
(Page 2 of 2)
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO, 1
DRILL RIG PORTABLE HOLLOW -STEM AUGER
PROJECT NO. P- 470085
BORING DIAMETER: 6.0"
DATE DRILLED: 09 -07 -05
SURFACE ELEV.: 85' (Approximate)
LOGGED BY MB
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
140 POUND HAMMER, 30" DROP
F
F
Q
V
U
1z
3
a
p
N
cV7
P2
GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
85.
0.00
SP
SOIL(Qs): Brown fine and medium - grained sand, slightly silty
91
2.00
SP
TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Tan to Reddish bm., fine and mod. - grain
1 12.9
7.8
4.00
SPT
7.8
14
79.0
6.00
77,
102.5
8.8
8.00
SPT
8.2
22
75.
10.
73
@ 12', Seepage
102.5
18.2
12.
—
From 12', Whitish tan fine and med.- grained sand,
SPT
16.7
50/8"
little or no cohesion
7t.
14.
...........
69.0 .....
.,
SPT
25.0
50/6"
67.
18.
SPT
25.9
50/5"
End of Boring @ 20'
_
65.0
20.00
sMT I or I COAST GEOTECHNICAL
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO. 2
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE HOLLOW -STEM AUGER
PROJECT NO. P- 470085
BORING DIAMETER: 6.0"
DATE DRILLED: 09 -07 -05
SURFACE ELEV.: 82' (Approximate)
LOGGED BY: MB
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
140 POUND HAMMER, 30" DROP
a
F4
z
0
3
a
�
2
F
�
w
?
°
Q
o
a
G7
H
GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
92.
0.00
SP
SOIL(Qs): Brown fine and medium - grained sand, slightly silty
Soil is loose with roots
20.
2.00
78..00
99.4
6.3
4.00
Loose
SPT
63
7
76.0
6.00
SP
TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Tan to Reddish bm., fine and med. -grain
sand
112.3
15.4
a oo
d
@ g' -9', Seepage
From 9', Whitish tan fine and med.- grained sand,
SPT
18.2
21
little or no cohesion
72.00
Medium Dense
10.0
70--OC
12.
SPT
25.1
50
Dense
68.0
--
14.0
66.Oa
_.......
V. Dense
End of Boring @ 16.5'
SPT
24.2
50/6"
sHEU i OF i COAST GEOTECHNICAL
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO.3
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE BUCKET AUGER
PROJECT NO. P- 470085
BORING DIAMETER: 3.5"
DATE DRILLED: 09 -06 -05
SURFACE ELEV.: 82' (Approximate)
LOGGED BY: MB
x.
a
F
H
zz
UU
N
U
Q
�
�
F
U
(ayayaryJJ
GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
82.00
OM
SM
FILL (af): Tan to bm. fine and medium - grained sand, dry, loose
SP
SOIL(Qs): Brown fine and medium - grained sand slightly silty
81.0
1.00
80.0
97.9
8.3
2.00
79.0
3.00
78.
97.4
1 10.7
*0
4.00
SP
TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Tan to Reddish bm., fine and med.- grained sand
p
77.0
5.00
p
4
slightly clayey, very moist
V
76.0
113.1
12.5
9
6.00
0
Ur
0
z
73.0
,00
74.0
101.3
11.9
8.00
71 0
From 10', Tan fine and medium- grained sand little or no cohesion
104.0
18.1
72.
End of Boring @ 10.5'
10.
SHM 1 of 1 COAST GEOTECHNICAL
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO.4
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE BUCKET AUGER
PROJECT NO. P- 470085
BORING DIAMETER: 3.5"
DATE DRILLED: 09 -06 -05
SURFACE ELEV.: 82' (Approximate)
LOGGED BY: MB
e
H
z
a
a
3
G
a
N
�
o
W
U a
U
yp�
as
GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
s2.ao
0 0.0
SP
SOIL(Qs): Brown fine and medium - grained sand, slightly silty
at.
1
1.00
SP
TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Tan to Reddish bm., fine and mod.- grained sand
slightly clayey
so.
103.5
8.5
2.00
79.
1.00
78.
97.6
8.1
4.00
From 4.5', Tan fine and medium- grained sand little or no cohesion
7'.0
s �o
76.'J
88.4
7.5
6.00
75.
700
74.
98.4
6.3
A
@9.8', Seepage
—
Lost
Sample
End of Boring @ 1 I', Caving to 9.8"
SHUT i or i COAST GEOTECHNICAL
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO.5
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE BUCKET AUGER
PROJECT NO. P- 470085
BORING DIAMETER: 3.5"
DATE DRILLED: 09 -06 -05
SURFACE ELEV.. 82' (Approximate)
LOGGED BY: MB
Q
w
W
U
0
3
>
a
w
U
LA
i
Q
ti
w
x
Q
ti
N
GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
82.01
0.00
SP
_
SO[L(Qs): Brown fine and medium- grained sand, slightly silty
30.0
s.00
113.4
9.0
graditional contact
SP
TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Tan to Reddish bm., fine and med - grained sand
78.
104.6
9.3
slightly clayey, moist
4.00
100.7
9.3
6.00
N
O
I.n
3
v
7s
98.3
10.3
s.00
0
U
0
z
72..00
to.
,�nIN7
From 10', Tan fine and medium - grained sand little or no cohesion
72.0
End of Boring ® 14'
68.
1 OF I
SHEEr 14.00 COAST GEOTECHNICAL
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO.6
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE BUCKET AUGER
PROJECT NO. P- 470085
BORING DIAMETER: 3.5"
DATE DRILLED: 09 -06 -05
SURFACE ELEV.: 82' (Approximate)
LOGGED BY. MB
e
�
�
Q
z
P O[-r+
y
U/
6
Vi
F
U
U
W
W
Vi
U Q
GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
92.00
0.00
SP
SOIL(Qs): Brown fine and medium - grained sand, slightly silty
91.00
dry, loose
1.00
so.
98.3
5.6
2.00
gradational contact
SP
TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Tan to Reddish bm., fine and med.- grained sand
79.
3.00
dry
79..00
4.00
7TOG
106.4
6.4
5.00
76.
6.00
700
slightly clayey, moist
Lost
Sample
74..00
8.00
n
(a� 8.8' Seepage
710C
"
"k
9.00
101.0
7.8
72.
"
End of Boring @ 105, Caving to 9'
10.
sxscr i or I COAST GEOTECHNICAL
_n_n_n_,._,�_�,_u_u_,�_u_u _.._.._.y
a
! ! sa 1 �& !' i
-
15' LOT I 313 GARAGE 9-3• GARAGE B_2 LOT 4 ! LOT AA
T LOT AREA LOOTA EA V: GRO.S.SEFT i0 !
GROSS LOT 2 - GROSS/NET ; 4,621 SF mx
1
2.836 SF ! LOT AREA i1 7,215 SF -
',°, GROSS/NET
_s 7.077 SF � r ! is rr„ rw.n
! GARAGE
1 1 .0 ,.�` � ..�•, u,w r.n�q QAR.AQI: ryq
1 1 �• n
.. f _....._._........_....._......_
V
7i'I7 I�rN+� n 8 S 3' 1
r
—_ -- — � rte• ,....._ ...
m
! PRIVATE STREET r �•.� o' i
to ! LOT 11 �• LOOT p 5
rA ! 7,649 SF CUI: DE -SAC , GROSSNET 1
TERRACE DEPOSITS _ �' $ 4,300 SF
— -vered by soil & in pt r ) S !
rmn {1 - -• 0
1 1 1 uen{m1 - \�'� ,.i �'^ r•�•'�.r � 1 cuu ry,uq ', 6
o.N_r GARAGL
1 1 on nrj �".1.1.,,,,,�, '� y W 1 1
° GARAGE °
uj
N i LOT 9 III ! >>
LOT AREA _.�1.i r.a ' ►�.. „,......^
GROSSINEI
2.982 SF I .T........_. 0.Q -------- I
! LOT 10 w i..v::: uN_r GARA
1 LOT AREA GE 1
1 1 LOT AREA 1 i i Y
s 2,040 SF GARAGE GARAGE
�_.._.r_ LOT 6 i
I.or AREA w'
B -5 i GRUSSSLT '1
1 1 4,064 SF I®'
^1 1 a,ee i
1 1 1
1
CONCEPT PLAN
SCALE: 1r' =30'
r +3D
aT1 j
LEGEND
I:w +iPx,nip
Z
LOT 7
BORING LOCATION (approx.)
��
1 (7TAIt1:3
ulTAIV r
4,740 SF
ni
1
1
cnRnG[
�
1
1
1
1
1
:n^
COAST GEOTECHNICAL I
P- 470095
APPENDIX B
150
100
50 '
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
450
CALIFORNIA FAULT MAP
STALEY
100 150 200 250 300 350 490 45u 5uu oou
* U B C S E I S
* Version 1.03
x +
COMPUTATION OF 1997
UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
JOB NUMBER: P- 470085
JOB NAME: STALEY
FAULT - DATA -FILE NAME: CDMGUBCR.DAT
SITE COORDINATES:
SITE LATITUDE: 33.0668
SITE LONGITUDE: 117.3006
UBC SEISMIC ZONE: 0.4
UBC SOIL PROFILE TYPE: SD
NEAREST TYPE A FAULT:
NAME: ELSINORE- JULIAN
DISTANCE: 43.7 km
NEAREST TYPE B FAULT:
NAME: ROSE CANYON
DISTANCE: 4.9 km
NEAREST TYPE C FAULT:
NAME:
DISTANCE: 99999.0 km
SELECTED UBC SEISMIC COEFFICIENTS:
Na: 1.0
Nv: 1.2
Ca: 0.44
Cv: 0.78
Ts: 0.699
To: 0.140
DATE: 09 -25 -2005
---------------------------
SUMMARY OF FAULT PARAMETERS
------ --------------- - - - - --
Page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
MAX.
APPROX.ISOURCE
FAULT
ABBREVIATED
DISTANCE
TYPE
FAULT NAME
I (km)
I(A,B,C)
ROSE CANYON
4.9
B
NEWPORT- INGLEWOOD (Offshore)
15.5
B
CORONADO BANK
29.3
B
ELSINORE - JULIAN
43.7
A
ELSINORE- TEMECULA
43.7
B
PALOS VERDES
64.0
B
LVALLEY
5.00
SS
EARTHQUAKE
I 68.2
I B
SAN JACINTO-ANZA
80.5
A
SAN JACINTO -SAN JACINTO VALLEY
83.0
B
NEWPORT- INGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin)
83.4
B
SAN JACINTO - COYOTE CREEK
85.7
B
CHINO- CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore)
I 86.7
B
ELSINORE- COYOTE MOUNTAIN
I 88.2
I B
ELSINORE - WHITTIER
93.0
I B
SAN JACINTO - BORREGO
104.2
B
SAN JACINTO -SAN BERNARDINO
I 105.7
B
SAN ANDREAS - Southern
111.9
A
SAN JOSE
120.1
1
B
PINTO MOUNTAIN
122.7
B
CUCAMONGA
124.3
A
SIERRA MADRE (Central)
124.4
B
SUPERSTITION MTN. (San Jacinto)
128.7
B
BURNT MTN.
130.2
B
NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (West)
132.1
B
CLEGHORN
134.3
B
EUREKA PEAK
134.6
B
ELMORE RANCH
134.8
B
SUPERSTITION HILLS (San Jacinto)
136.4
B
ELSINORE-LAGUNA SALADA
137.5
B
RAYMOND
138.8
B
NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (East)
139.1
B
CLAMSHELL- SAWPIT
139.5
B
SAN ANDREAS - 1857 Rupture I
139.9
A
VERDUGO
142.6
B
HOLLYWOOD
145.6
B
LANDERS
147.1
B
HELENDALE - S. LOCKHARDT
150.4
B
BRAWLEY SEISMIC ZONE
151.7
B
SANTA MONICA
152.9
B
LENWOOD - LOCKHART -OLD WOMAN SPRGS
156.0
B
MALIBU COAST
157.0
B
EMERSON So. - COPPER MTN.
159.6
B
JOHNSON VALLEY (Northern)
160.3
B
IMPERIAL
162.3
A
SIERRA MADRE (San Fernando)
163.4
B
MAX.
SLIP
FAULT
MAG.
RATE
TYPE
(Mw)
(mm /yr)
(SS,DS,BT)
6.9
1.50
SS
6.9
1.50
SS
7.4
3.00
SS
7.1
5.00
SS
6.8
5.00
SS
7.1
3.00
I SS
6.8
5.00
SS
6.S
2.00
SS
7.2
12.00
SS
6.9
12.00
SS
6.9
1.00
SS
6.8
4.00
SS
6.7
1.00
DS
6.6
4.00
SS
6.8
2.50
SS
6.6
4.00
SS
6.7
12.00
SS
7.4
24.00
SS
6.5
0.50
DS
7.0
2.50
SS
7.0
5.00
DS
7.0
3.00
DS
I
6.6
5.00
SS
6.5
0.60
SS
7.0
1.00
DS
6.5
3.00
SS
6.5
0.60
SS
6.6
1.00
SS
6.6
4.00
SS
7.0
3.50
SS
6.5
0.50
DS
6.7
I 0.50
DS
6.5
0.50
DS
7.8
34.00
SS
6.7
0.50 I
DS
6.5
1.00 f
DS
7.3
I 0.60 I
SS
7.1
I 0.60 I
SS
6.5
25.00 I
SS
6.6
1.00 I
DS
7.3
0.60
SS
6.7
0.30
DS
6.9
0.60
SS
6.7 I
0.60
SS
7.0
20.00
SS
6.7 I
2.00
DS
---------------------------
SUMMARY OF FAULT PARAMETERS
________ __ __ _______ ______ __
Page 2
------------------------------------------------ ---- -------- -- ------- --- --- ----
MAX.
APPROX.ISOURCE
I FAULT
ABBREVIATED IDISTANCEI
RATE
TYPE
FAULT NAME
I (km)
I(A,B,C)
ANACAPA -DUME
165.2
B
SAN GABRIEL
166.4
B
PISGAH- BULLION MTN.- MESQUITE LK
169.3
B
CALICO - HIDALGO
173.1
B
SANTA SUSANA
178.7
B
HOLSER
187.6
B
SIMI -SANTA ROSA
194.9
B
OAK RIDGE (Onshore)
195.8
B
GRAVEL HILLS - HARPER LAKE
203.9
B
SAN CAYETANO
( 204.3
B
BLACKWATER
219.2
B
VENTURA - PITAS POINT
222.8
B
SANTA YNEZ (East)
I 224.1
B
SANTA CRUZ ISLAND
230.5
B
M.RIDGE- ARROYO PARIDA -SANTA ANA
233.6
B
RED MOUNTAIN
236.6
B
GARLOCK (West)
240.9
A
PLEITO THRUST
246.0
I B
BIG PINE
251.6
B
GARLOCK (East)
1 255.7
A
SANTA ROSA ISLAND
265.1
B
WHITE WOLF
266.7
B
SANTA YNEZ (West)
I 268.4
B
So. SIERRA NEVADA
280.1
B
LITTLE LAKE
284.7
B
OWL LAKE
285.1
B
PANAMINT VALLEY
285.4
B
TANK CANYON
286.3
B
DEATH VALLEY (South)
293.8
B
LOS ALAMOS -W. BASELINE
310.4
B
LIONS HEAD
328.1
B
DEATH VALLEY (Graben)
335.5
B
SAN LUIS RANGE (S. Margin)
337.9
B
SAN JUAN
339.1
B
CASMALIA (Orcutt Frontal Fault)
346.2
B
OWENS VALLEY
353.1
B
LOS OSOS
I 368.1
B
HOSGRI
373.8
B
HUNTER MTN. - SALINE VALLEY
I 379.4
B
DEATH VALLEY (Northern)
388.9
A
INDEPENDENCE
I 389.0
B
RINCONADA
389.2
B
BIRCH CREEK
445.3
B
SAN ANDREAS (Creeping)
445.9
B
WHITE MOUNTAINS
449.8
B
DEEP SPRINGS
468.3
B
MAX.
SLIP
I FAULT
MAG. I
RATE
TYPE
(Mw) I
(mm /Yr)
I(SS,DS,BT)
7.3
3.00
DS
7.0
1.00
SS
7.1
0.60
SS
7.1 I
0.60
SS
6.6
5.00
DS
6.5
0.40
DS
6.7 I
1.00
DS
6.9
4.00
DS
6.9
0.60
SS
6.8
6.00
DS
6.9
0.60
I SS
6.8
1.00
DS
7.0
2.00
SS
6.8
1.00
DS
6.7 I
0.40
DS
6.8
2.00
DS
7.1 I
6.00
SS
6.8
2.00
DS
6.7
0.80
I SS
7.3
7.00
SS
6.9
1.00
DS
7.2
2.00
DS
6.9
2.00
SS
7.1
0.10
DS
6.7
0.70
SS
6.5
2.00
SS
7.2
2.50
I SS
6.5
I 1.00
DS
6.9
4.00
SS
6.8
0.70
DS
6.6
0.02
DS
6.9
I 4.00
DS
7.0
0.20
DS
7.0
1.00
SS
6.5
0.25
DS
7.6
I 1.50
SS
6.8
0.50
DS
7.3
2.50
SS
7.0
2.50
SS
7.2
5.00
SS
6.9
0.20
DS
7.3
1.00
SS
6.5
0.70
DS
5.0
34.00
SS
7.1
1.00
SS
6.6
I 0.80
I DS
---------------------------
SUMMARY OF FAULT PARAMETERS
--------------------- - - - - --
Page 3
I
APPROX.ISOURCE I
MAX. I
SLIP I
FAULT
ABBREVIATED IDISTANCEI
TYPE I
MAG. I
RATE I
TYPE
FAULT NAME I
(km)
I(A,B,C)l
(Mw) I
(mm /yr)
(SS,DS,BT)
DEATH VALLEY (N of Cucamongo) I
473.4
A
7.0
5.00
I
SS
ROUND VALLEY (E. of S.N.Mtns.) I
480.4
B I
6.8
I
1.00
DS
FISH SLOUGH I
488.2
B
6.6
I
0.20
I
DS
HILTON CREEK I
506.5
B
6.7
I
2.50
I
DS
ORTIGALITA I
530.4
B
5.9
1.00
SS
HARTLEY SPRINGS I
530.8
B I
6.6
I
0.50
DS
CALAVERAS (So.of Calaveras Res) I
535.8
B I
6.2
I
15.00
I
SS
MONTEREY BAY - TULARCITOS I
538.3
B
I
7.1
I
0.50
I
DS
PALO COLORADO - SUR I
539.1
B
7.0
3.00
I
SS
QUIEN SABE
549.1
B I
6.5
1.00
I
SS
MONO LAKE I
566.8
B I
6.6
2.50
DS
ZAYANTE-VERGELES
567.6
B I
6.8
0.10
SS
SAN ANDREAS (1906)
I 572.8
A I
7.9
24.00
I
SS
SARGENT
I 572.9
I
B I
6.8
3.00
I
SS
ROBINSON CREEK
I 596.0
I
B I
6.5
0.50
I
DS
SAN GREGORIO
I 613.7
A I
7.3
5.00
I
SS
GREENVILLE
I 622.8
I
B I
6.9
2.00
I
SS
MONTE VISTA - SHANNON
I 623.0
I
B
6.5
I 0.40
I
DS
HAYWARD (SE Extension)
I 623.2
B
6.5
I 3.00
I
SS
ANTELOPE VALLEY
i 638.4
B
6.7
I 0.80
I
DS
HAYWARD (Total Length)
642.9
I
A
I 7.1
I 9.00
I
SS
CALAVERAS (NO.of Calaveras Res)
642.9
I
B
I 6.8
I 6.00
SS
GENOA
663.7
B
I 6.9
I 1.00
US
CONCORD - GREEN VALLEY
690.8
I
B
6.9
I 6.00
SS
RODGERS CREEK
729.5
I
A
7.0
I 9.00
SS
WEST NAPA
730.4
I
B
6.5
I 1.00
SS
POINT REYES
I 748.2
I
B
6.8
0.30
I DS
HUNTING CREEK - BERRYESSA
I 753.0
B
6.9
I 6.00
I SS
MAACAMA (South)
I 792.3
B
I 6.9
I 9.00
I SS
COLLAYOMI
I 809.2
I
B
I 6.5
0.60
I SS
BARTLETT SPRINGS
812.8
I
A
I 7.1
6.00
SS
MAACAMA (Central)
I 833.9
I
A
I 7.1
I 9.00
SS
MAACAMA (North)
I 893.5
I
A
I 7.1
9.00
I
I SS
ROUND VALLEY (N. S.F.Bay)
I 899.7
I
B
I 6.8
6.00
I SS
BATTLE CREEK
I 923.5
I
B
I 6.5
I 0.50
I DS
LAKE MOUNTAIN
I 958.2
I
B
I 6.7
I 6.00
I SS
GARBERVILLE- BRICELAND
975.3
I
B
I 6.9
I 9.00
I SS
MENDOCINO FAULT ZONE
1031.5
A
7.4
I 35.00
DS
LITTLE SALMON (Onshore)
1 1038.3
A
7.0
I 5.00
DS
MAD RIVER
1 1041.1
B
7.1
I 0.70
DS
CASCADIA SUBDUCTION ZONE
1045.2
A
8.3
I 35.00
DS
MCKINLEYVILLE
1 1051.5
B
I 7.0
I 0.60
DS
TRINIDAD
1 1053.1
B
I 7.3
I 2.50
DS
FICKLE HILL
1 1053.5
I
B
I 6.9
I 0.60
I DS
TABLE BLUFF
1 1058.9
B
I 7.0
0.60
DS
LITTLE SALMON (Offshore)
i 1072.2
I
B
I 7.1
1.00
I DS
DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM
Seismic Zone: 0.4 Soil Profile: SD
2.50
2.25
2.00
1.75
0
1.50
L
1.25
U
Q 1.00
Cu 0.75
U
Q. 0.50
0.25
0.00
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Period Seconds
APPENDIX C
GRADING GUIDELINES
Grading should be performed to at least the minimum requirements of the governing agencies,
Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code, the geotechnical report and the guidelines presented
below. All of the guidelines may not apply to a specific site and additional recommendations
may be necessary during the grading phase.
Site Clearins
Trees, dense vegetation, and other deleterious materials should be removed from the site. Non -
organic debris or concrete may be placed in deeper fill areas under direction of the Soils
engineer.
Subdrainaee
Duringgrading, the Geologist and Soils Engineershould evaluate the necessity of placing
additional drains.
All subdrainage systems should be observed by the Geologist and Soils Engineer during
construction and prior to covering with compacted fill.
Consideration should be given to having subdrains located by the project surveyors.
Outlets should be located and protected.
Treatment of Existing Ground
All heavy vegetation, rubbish and other deleterious materials should be disposed of off
site.
All surficial deposits including alluvium and colluvium should be removed unless
otherwise indicated in the text of this report. Groundwater existing in the alluvial areas
may make excavation difficult. Deeper removals than indicated in the text of the report
may be necessary due to saturation during winter months.
Subsequent to removals, the natural ground should be processed to a depth of six
inches, moistened to near optimum moisture conditions and compacted to fill standards.
fill Placement
Most site soil and bedrock may be reused for compacted fill; however, some special
processing or handling may be required (see report). Highly organic or contaminated
soil should not be used for compacted fill.
(1)
2. Material used in the compacting process should be evenly spread, moisture conditioned,
processed, and compacted in thin lifts not to exceed six inches in thickness to obtain a
uniformly dense layer. The fill should be placed and compacted on a horizontal plane,
unless otherwise found acceptable by the Soils Engineer.
3. If the moisture content or relative density varies from that acceptable to the Soils
engineer, the Contractor should rework the fill until it is in accordance with the
following:
a) Moisture content of the fill should be at or above optimum moisture. Moisture
should be evenly distributed without wet and dry pockets. Pre - watering of cut
or removal areas should be considered in addition to watering during fill
placement, particularly in clay or dry surficial soils.
b) Each six inch layer should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum
density in compliance with the testing method specified by the controlling
governmental agency. In this case, the testing method is ASTM Test Designation
D- 1557 -91.
4. Side -hill fills should have a minimum equipment -width key at their toe excavated
through all surficial soil and into competent material (see report) and tilted back into the
hill. As the fill is elevated, it should be benched through surficial deposits and into
competent bedrock or other material deemed suitable by the Soils Engineer.
5. Rock fragments less than six inches in diameter may be utilized in the fill, provided:
a) They are not placed in concentrated pockets;
b) There is a sufficient percentage of fine - grained material to surround the rocks;
c) The distribution of the rocks is supervised by the Soils Engineer.
6. Rocks greater than six inches in diameter should be taken off site, or placed in
accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Engineer in areas designated as
suitable for rock disposal.
7. In clay soil large chunks or blocks are common; if in excess of six (6) inches minimum
dimension then they are considered as oversized. Sheepsfoot compactors or other
suitable methods should be used to break the up blocks.
8. The Contractor should be required to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90
percent out to the finished slope face of fill slopes. This may be achieved by either
overbuildingthe slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction
of the slope face with suitable equipment.
(2)
If fill slopes are built "at grade" using direct compaction methods then the slope
construction should be performed so that a constant gradient is maintained throughout
construction. Soil should not be "spilled" over the slope face nor should slopes be
"pushed our to obtain grades. Compaction equipment should compact each lift along
the immediate top of slope. Slopes should be back rolled approximately every 4 feet
vertically as the slope is built. Density tests should be taken periodically during grading
on the flat surface of the fill three to five feet horizontally from the face of the slope.
In addition, if a method other than over building and cutting back to the compacted
core is to be employed, slope compaction testing during construction should include
testing the outer six inches to three feet in the slope face to determine if the required
compaction is being achieved. Finish grade testing of the slope should be performed
after construction is complete. Each day the Contractor should receive a copy of the
Soils Engineer's "Daily Field Engineering Report" which would indicate the results of field
density tests that day.
9. Fill over cut slopes should be constructed in the following manner:
a) All surficial soils and weathered rock materials should be removed at the cut -fill
interface.
b) A key at least 1 equipment width wide (see report) and tipped at least 1 foot into
slope should be excavated into competent materials and observed by the Soils
Engineer or his representative.
c) The cut portion of the slope should be constructed prior to fill placement to
evaluate if stabilization is necessary, the contractor should be responsible for any
additional earthwork created by placing fill prior to cut excavation.
10. Transition lots (cut and fill) and lots above stabilization fills should be capped with a four
foot thick compacted fill blanket (or as indicated in the report).
11. Cut pads should be observed by the Geologist to evaluate the need for overexcavation
and replacementwith fill. This may be necessary to reduce water infiltration into highly
fractured bedrock or other permeable zones,and /or due to differing expansive potential
of materials beneath a structure. The overexcavation should be at least three feet.
Deeper overexcavation may be recommended in some cases.
12. Exploratory backhoe or dozer trenches still remaining after site removal should be
excavated and filled with compacted fill if they can be located.
Grading Observation and Testing
Observation of the fill placement should be provided by the Soils Engineer during the
progress of grading.
(3)
2. In general, density tests would be made at intervals not exceeding two feet of fill height
or every 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. This criteria will vary depending on soil
conditions and the size of the fill. In any event, an adequate number of field density
tests should be made to evaluate if the required compaction and moisture content is
generally being obtained.
3. Density tests may be made on the surface material to receive fill, as required by the Soils
Engineer.
4. Cleanouts, processed ground to receive fill, key excavations,subdrains and rock disposal
should be observed by the Soils Engineer prior to placing any fill. It will be the
Contractor's responsibility to notify the Soils Engineer when such areas are ready for
observation.
5. A Geologist should observe subdrain construction.
6. A Geologist should observe benching prior to and during placement of fill.
Utility Trench Backfill
Utility trench backfill should be placed to the following standards:
1. Ninety percent of the laboratory standard if native material is used as backfill.
2. As an alternative, clean sand may be utilized and flooded into place. No specific relative
compaction would be required; however, observation, probing, and if deemed
necessary, testing may be required.
3. Exterior trenches, paralleling a footing and extending below a 1:1 plane projected from
the outside bottom edge of the footing, should be compacted to 90 percent of the
laboratory standard. Sand backfill, unless it is similar to the inplace fill, should not be
allowed in these trench backfill areas.
Density testing along with probing should be accomplished to verify the desired results.
(4)
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
CONSULTING I•;NGINF,ERS AND GEOWGISF'S
October 3, 2005
Jed L. Staley
1106 2nd Street, Suite 120
Encinitas, CA 92024
Subject: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Proposed Ten (10) Lot Subdivision
1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue
Encinitas, California
Dear Mr. Staley:
In response to your request and in accordance with our Proposal and Agreement dated August 23,
2005, we have performed a preliminary geologic and soils engineering investigation on the subject
site for the proposed residential development.
The findings of the investigation, laboratory test results and recommendations for site development
and foundation design are presented in this report.
From a geologic and soils engineering point of view, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the
proposed development, provided the recommendations in this report are implemented during the
design and construction phases.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (858) 755 -8622. This opportunity
to be of service is appreciated.
Respectfully
COAST GE(
G,1 c 2109
i� r Cr Exp. 109 5-31-06
l CFRTIFIFn
Mark Burwell, C.E.GS
Engineering Geologist
G
Vithaya Sing
Geotechnical
782
Exp. 12-31-05
779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075
(858) 755 -8622 • FAX (858) 755 -9126
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Proposed Ten (10) Lot Subdivision
1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue
Encinitas, California
Prepared For:
Jed L. Staley
1106 2"" Street, Suite 120
Encinitas, CA 92024
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Prepared By:
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
779 Academy Drive
Solana Beach, California 92075
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VICINITY MAP
4
INTRODUCTION
5
SITE CONDITIONS
5
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
6
SITE INVESTIGATION
6
LABORATORY TESTING
7
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
8
CONCLUSIONS
11
RECOMMENDATIONS
12
A. REMOVALS/RECOMPACTION /GRADING
12
B. TEMPORARY SLOPES/EXCAVATION CHARACTERISTICS
13
C. FOUNDATIONS
13
D. SLABS ON GRADE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR)
14
E. RETAINING WALLS
15
F. SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS
15
G. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS
16
H. SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
16
I. UTILITY TRENCH
17
J. PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN
17
K. DRAINAGE
18
L. GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATIONS
18
M. PLAN REVIEW
19
LIMITATIONS
19
REFERENCES
21
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
BORING LOGS
CONCEPT PLAN
APPENDIX B REGIONAL FAULT MAP
SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM
APPENDIX C GRADING GUIDELINES
w Celort wm
1 -4ft7 R Deb Zo 14-7
Coast Geotechnical
INTRODUCTION
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 5
This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation on the subject property. The
purpose of this study is to evaluate the nature and characteristics of the earth materials underlying
the property, the engineering properties of the surficial deposits and their influence on the proposed
residential development.
SITE CONDITIONS
The subject property is located north of L.eucadia Boulevard, along the east side of Hermes Avenue,
in the L.eucadia district, city of Encinitas.
The subject property includes an L- shaped parcel of land of approximately one acre. The site slopes
gently to the west and includes several residential structures. The existing structures consist of single
family residences and multi -unit dwellings which enter from Hennes Avenue. The property is
bounded along the north, south and east by developed residential lots and along the west by Hermes
Avenue. Relief on the site is estimated to be about 5.0 vertical feet.
Vegetation consists of residential landscaping including grass, shrubs and several mature trees and
stumps. Drainage is generally by sheet flow to the west.
Coast Geotechnical October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 6
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Preliminary concept plans for the development of the site were prepared by Sampo Engineering. The
project includes splitting the property into ten (10) separate lots. Each lot will accommodate a
single family residence with an attached garage. Access will be provided by a private street which
enters from Hermes Avenue, a cull -de -sac and a private driveway. It is assumed that lot
development will be at or near the existing grade. Only minor grading is anticipated. The existing
residences and accessory units will be demolished.
SITE INVESTIGATION
Two (2) exploratory borings were drilled to a maximum depth of 20 feet with a hollow -stem drill
rig. Four (4) exploratory borings were drilled to a maximum depth of 14 feet with a portable auger
drill in less accessible areas of the site. Earth materials encountered were visually classified and
logged by our field engineering geologist. Standard penetration tests (SPT) were performed in the
hollow -stem boring. Undisturbed, representative samples of earth materials were obtained at
selected intervals. Samples were obtained by driving a thin walled steel sampler into the desired
strata. The samples are retained in brass rings of 2.5 inches outside diameter and 1.0 inches in
height. The central portion of the sample is retained in close fitting, waterproof containers and
transported to our laboratory for testing and analysis.
Coast Geotechnical
LABORATORY TESTING
Classification
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 7
The field classification was verified through laboratory examination, in accordance with the Unified
Soil Classification System. The final classification is shown on the enclosed Exploratory Logs.
Moisture /Density
The field moisture content and dry unit weight were determined for each of the undisturbed soil
samples. This information is useful in providing a gross picture of the soil consistency or variation
among exploratory excavations. The dry unit weight was determined in pounds per cubic foot. The
field moisture content was determined as a percentage of the dry unit weight. Both are shown on
the enclosed Laboratory Tests Results and Exploratory Logs.
Maximum Dry Density /Optimum Moisture Content
The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were determined for selected samples of
earth materials taken from the site. The laboratory standard tests were in accordance with ASTM
D- 1557 -91. The results of the tests are presented in the enclosed Laboratory Test Results.
Shear Test
Shear tests were performed in a strain - control type direct shear machine. The rate of deformation
was approximately 0.025 inches per minute. Each sample was sheared under varying confining loads
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 8
in order to determine the Coulomb shear strength parameters, cohesion and angle of internal friction.
Samples were tested in a saturated condition. The results are presented in the Laboratory Test
Results.
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
The subject property is located in the Coastal Plains Physiographic Province of San Diego county
and is underlain at relatively shallow depths by Pleistocene -age terrace deposits. The Pleistocene
sands are underlain at depth by Eocene -age sedimentary rocks of the Torrey sandstone interfingered
with the Santiago Formation. The Pleistocene deposits are covered by residual soil and minor
isolated fill deposits. A brief description of the earth materials observed on the site is discussed
below.
Artificial Fill
No evidence of significant fill deposits were observed on the site. Minor fill deposits are present in
and around the existing structures and site walls, and are composed of locally derived fine and
medium - grained sand.
Soil
Considerable variation occurs within the depth of soil. Approximately 1.0 to 6.0 feet of brown silty,
fine and medium - grained sand was encountered in the exploratory borings. The soil is generally
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 9
moist and loose. The contact with the underlying terrace deposits is gradational and the depth of soil
will vary across the site.
Terrace Deposits
Underlying the surficial materials, Pleistocene terrace deposits are present. The sediments are
composed of tan to reddish brown weakly cemented, fine and medium - grained sand. The upper 2.0
to 3.0 feet of the sedimentary unit is generally loose and weathered. Some degree of lateral variation
within the sedimentary unit occurs and the depth of weathered sediments will vary across the site.
Below the weathered zone, the terrace deposits become increasingly dense. Regionally, the
Pleistocene sands are considered flat -lying and are underlain by Eocene -age sedimentary rock units.
Expansive Soil
Based on our experience in the area and previous laboratory testing of selected samples, the soil and
terrace deposits reflect an expansion potential in the very low range.
Groundwater
Seepage was encountered at depths ranging from 8.8 feet to 12 feet, in Boring Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 6.
The seepage appears to be perched, in part, above dense terrace deposits encountered at a depth of
12 to 13 feet. It should be noted that seepage problems can develop after completion of construction.
These seepage problems most often result from drainage alterations, landscaping and over - irrigation.
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 10
In the event that seepage or saturated ground does occur, it has been our experience that they are
most effectively handled on an individual basis.
Tectonic Setting
The site is located within the seismically active southern California region which is generally
characterized by northwest trending Quaternary-age fault zones. Several of these fault zones and
fault segments are classified as active by the California Division of Mines and Geology (Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act).
Based on a review of published geologic maps, no known faults transverse the site. The nearest
active fault is the offshore Rose Canyon Fault Zone located approximately 3.0 miles west of the site.
It should be noted that the Rose Canyon Fault is not a continuous, well- defined feature but rather a
zone of right stepping en echelon faults. The complex series of faults has been referred to as the
Offshore Zone of Deformation (Woodward - Clyde, 1979) and is not fully understood. Several studies
suggest that the Newport- Inglewood and the Rose Canyon faults are a continuous zone of en echelon
faults (Treiman, 1984). Further studies along the complex offshore zone of faulting may indicate
a potentially greater seismic risk than current data suggests. Other faults which could affect the site
include the Coronado Bank, Elsinore, San Jacinto and San Andreas Faults. The proximity of major
faults to the site and site parameters are shown on the enclosed Earthquake Fault Analysis.
Coast Geotechnical
Landslidine
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 11
No landslides have been mapped on the site or in the immediate vicinity of the property. Due to the
low topographic relief, the potential for landsliding is considered low to nonexistent.
Liquefaction Potential
Liquefaction is a process bywhich a sand mass loses its shearing strength completely and flows. The
temporary transformation of the material into a fluid mass is often associated with ground motion
resulting from an earthquake.
Owing to the moderately dense nature of the underlying Pleistocene sands and the anticipated depth
to ground water, the potential for seismically induced liquefaction and soil instability is considered
low.
CONCLUSIONS
I ) The subject property is located in an area that is relatively free of potential geologic hazards
such as landsliding, liquefaction, and seismically induced subsidence.
2) The existing fill, soil and weathered terrace deposits are unsuitable for the support of
foundations, concrete flatwork or proposed fills in their present condition. The existing fill,
soil and weathered terrace deposits should be removed and replaced as properly compacted
fill for the support of proposed foundations, concrete flatwork or proposed fills. Significant
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 12
variations in the depth of soil occurs across the site. Additional recommendations will be
necessary during the remedial grading phase.
3) Care should be exercised by the grader in removals adjacent to the existing property lines and
adjacent structures. A minimum 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) temporary slope should be
provided adjacent to property lines where structures may be affected. Additional
recommendations may be necessary based on a review of the proposed grading plans.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Removal s /Recompaction/Grading
Prior to placement of proposed fills, the existing fill, soil and weathered terrace deposits should be
removed and replaced as properly compacted fill. Removals arc estimated to be on the order of 4.0
to 7.0 feet. However, additional depth of removal maybe required depending upon actual conditions
revealed during grading. Removals should include the entire building pad extending a minimum
of 5.0 feet beyond the building footprint. The existing earth deposits are generally suitable for reuse,
provided they are cleaned of all roots, vegetation, debris and rocks larger than 6.0 inches, and
thoroughly mixed. Fill should be placed in 6.0 to 8.0 inch loose lifts, moistened as required to 1.0-
2.0 percent above optimum moisture, and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory
maximum dry density. Fill slopes should be constructed at a maximum gradient of 2:1 (horizontal
to vertical). Additional recommendations will be presented should any unforeseen conditions be
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 13
encountered during grading. Fill, soil and weathered terrace deposits in areas of proposed concrete,
exterior improvements and driveway should be removed and replaced as properly compacted fill.
Imported fill should be composed of nonexpansive granular deposits approved by the geotechnical
engineer.
Temporary Slopes /Excavation Characteristics
Temporary excavations which exceed a vertical height of 3.5 feet should be trimmed to a gradient
of 3/4:1 (horizontal to vertical) or less. Based on our experience, the terrace deposits are rippable
with conventional heavy grading equipment in good working order. Care should be exercised in
removals adjacent to the existing property lines where adjacent structures are present. A 1:1
(horizontal to vertical) temporary slope should be provided adjacent to property lines where adjacent
structures are inclose proximity. Additional recommendations will be necessary during grading, in
this regard.
Foundations
The following design parameters are based on an anticipated expansion potential in the low range.
Footings for the proposed residences and garages should be a minimum of 12 inches wide and
founded a minimum of 12 and 18 inches below the lower most adjacent grade at the time of
foundation construction for single -story and two -story structures, respectively. A 12 inch by 12 inch
grade beam should be placed across garage openings. The base of footings should be maintained
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 14
a minimum of 10.0 lateral feet from the edge of the nearest slope. Footings should be reinforced
with a minimum of two No. 4 bars, one along the top of the footing and one along the base. Footing
recommendations provided herein are based upon underlying soil conditions and are not intended
to be in lieu of the project structural engineer's design.
For design purposes, an allowable bearing value of 1700 and 2000 pounds per square foot may be
used for foundations at the recommended footing depths for single story and two story structures,
respectively.
The bearing value indicated above is for the total dead and frequently applied live loads. This value
may be increased by 33 percent for short durations of loading, including the effects of wind and
seismic forces.
Resistance to lateral load may be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by
passive earth pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used with dead -load forces. A
passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth of approved fill penetrated
to a maximum of 2500 pounds per square foot may be used.
Slabs on Grade (Interior and Exterior)
Slabs on grade should be a minimum of 4.0 inches thick and reinforced in both directions with No.
3 bars placed 18 inches on center in both directions. The slab should be underlain by a minimum
2.0 -inch sand blanket (S.E. greater than 30). Where moisture sensitive floors are used, a minimum
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 15
6.0 -mil Visqueen or equivalent moisture barrier should be placed over the sand blanket and covered
by an additional two inches of sand. Utility trenches underlying the slab may be backfilled with on-
site materials, compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. Slabs
including exterior concrete flatwork should be reinforced as indicated above and provided with saw
cuts /expansion joints, as recommended by the project structural engineer. All slabs should be cast
over dense compacted subgrades.
Retaining Walls
The following soil parameters may be used in the design of new walls. Cantilever walls (yielding)
retaining nonexpansive granular soils may be designed for an active - equivalent fluid pressure of 35
pounds per cubic foot. Restrained walls (nonyielding) should be designed for an "at- rest" equivalent
fluid pressure of 58 pounds per cubic foot. Wall footings should be designed in accordance with the
foundation design recommendations. All retaining walls should be provided with an adequate
backdrainage system (Miradrain 6000 or equivalent is suggested). The soil parameters assume a
level granular backfill compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry
density.
Settlement Characteristics
Estimated total and differential settlement over a horizontal distance of 30 feet is expected to be on
the order of /. inch and %2 inch, respectively. It should also be noted that long term secondary
settlement due to irrigation and loads imposed by structures is anticipated to be %. inch.
Coast Geotechnical
Seismic Considerations
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 16
Although the likelihood of ground rupture on the site is remote, the property will be exposed to
moderate to high levels of ground motion resulting from the release of energy should an earthquake
occur along the numerous known and unknown faults in the region.
The Rose Canyon Fault Zone is the nearest known active fault, located approximately 3.0 miles west
of the property, and is considered the design earthquake for the site. A maximum probable event
along the offshore segment of the Rose Canyon Fault is expected to produce a peak bedrock
horizontal acceleration of 0.45g and a repeatable ground acceleration of 0.308.
Seismic Design Parameters (1997 Uniform Building Code)
Soil Profile Type - Sp
Seismic Zone - 4
Seismic Source - Type B
Near Source Factor (N,) - 1.2
Near source Acceleration Factor (NJ - 1.0
Seismic Coefficients
C. = 0.44
C, = 0.78
Design Response Spectrum
T, = 0.699
T. = 0.140
Nearest Type B Fault - 4.9 km
Coast Geotechnical
Utility Trench
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 17
We recommend that all utilities be bedded in clean sand to at least one foot above the top of the
conduit. The bedding should be flooded in place to fill all the voids around the conduit. Imported
or on -site granular material compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction maybe utilized for
backfill above the bedding.
The invert of subsurface utility excavations paralleling footings should be located above the zone
of influence of these adjacent footings. This zone of influence is defined as the area below a 45
degree plane projected down from the nearest bottom edge of an adjacent footing. This can be
accomplished by either deepening the footing, raising the invert elevation of the utility, or moving
the utility or the footing away from one another.
Preliminary Pavement Design
Previous testing by this firm in the vicinity of the site suggests an R -value of 43 for Pleistocene
sands. The following pavement design is the minimum city standard but may need to be revised
based on actual conditions encountered during grading.
4.0 inches of asphaltic paving or 5.0 inches of concrete on
6.0 inches of select base (Class 2) on
12 inches of compacted subgrade soils
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 18
Subgrade soils should be compacted to the thickness indicated in the structural section and left in
a condition to receive base materials. Class 2 base materials should have a minimum R -value of 78
and a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Subgrade soils and base materials should be compacted to
a minimum of 95 percent of their laboratory maximum dry density.
The pavement section should be protected from water sources. Migration of water into subgrade
deposits and base materials could result in pavement failure.
Drainage
Specific drainage patterns should be designed by the project architect or engineer. However, in
general, pad water should be directed away from foundations and around the structure to the street.
Roof water should be collected and conducted to hardscape or the street, via non - erodible devices.
Pad water should not be allowed to pond or flow onto slopes. Vegetation adjacent to foundations
should be avoided. If vegetation in these areas is desired, sealed planter boxes or drought resistant
plants should be considered. Other alternatives may be available, however, the intent is to reduce
moisture from migrating into foundation subsoils. Irrigation should be limited to that amount
necessary to sustain plant life. All drainage systems should be inspected and cleaned annually, prior
to winter rains.
Geotechni cal Observations
Structural footing excavations should be observed by a representative of this firm, prior to the
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P- 470085
Page 19
placement of steel and forms. All fill should be placed while a representative of the geotechnical
engineer is present to observe and test.
Plan Review
A copy of the final plans should be submitted to this office for review prior to the initiation of
construction. Additional recommendations may be necessary at that time.
LIMITATIONS
This report is presented with the provision that it is the responsibility of the owner or the owner's
representative to bring the information and recommendations given herein to the attention of the
project's architects and/or engineers so that they may be incorporated into plans.
If conditions encountered during construction appear to differ from those described in this report,
our office should be notified so that we may consider whether modifications are needed. No
responsibility for construction compliance with design concepts, specifications or recommendations
given in this report is assumed unless on -site review is performed during the course of construction.
The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure described herein are
based on individual exploratory excavations made on the subject property. The subsurface
conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure discussed should in no way be
construed to reflect any variations which may occur among the exploratory excavations.
Coast Geotechnical
October 3, 2005
W.O. P-470085
Page 20
Please note that Fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall,
temperature and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made and reported herein.
Coast Geotechnical assumes no responsibility for variations which may occur across the site.
The conclusions and recommendations of this report apply as of the current date. In time, however,
changes can occur on a property whether caused by acts of man or nature on this or adjoining
properties. Additionally, changes in professional standards may be brought about by legislation or
the expansion of knowledge. Consequently, the conclusions and recommendations of this report
may be rendered wholly or partially invalid by events beyond our control. This report is therefore
subject to review and should not be relied upon after the passage of two years.
The professional judgments presented herein are founded partly on our assessment of the technical
data gathered, partly on our understanding of the proposed construction and partly on our general
experience in the geotechnical field. However, in no respect do we guarantee the outcome of the
project.
This study has been provided solely for the benefit of the client and is in no way intended to benefit
or extend any right or interest to any third party. This study is not to be used on other projects or
extensions to this project except by agreement in writing with Coast Geotechnical.
Coast Geotechnical October 3, 2005
W.O. P470085
Page 21
REFERENCES
1. Hays, Walter W., 1980, Procedures for Estimating Earthquake Ground Motions, Geological
Survey Professional Paper 1114, 77 pages.
Petersen, Mark D. and others (DMG), Frankel, Arthur D. and others (USGS), 1996,
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California, California Division of
Mines and Geology OFR 96 -08, United States Geological Survey OFR 96 -706.
3. Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M., 1970, A Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction
Potential: Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
4. Tan, S.S., and Gifl'en, D.G., 1995, Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego
Metropolitan Area, San Diego County, Plate 35D, Open -File Report 95 -04, Map Scale
1:24,000.
5. Treiman, J.A., 1984, The Rose Canyon Fault Zone, A Review and Analysis, California
Division of Mines and Geology.
MAPS /AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
Aerial Photograph, 1982, Foto -Map D -9, Scale 1 "= 2000'.
2. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1994, Fault Activity Map of California, Scale
1 "= 750,000'.
3. Geologic Map of the Encinitas and Rancho Santa Fe 7.5' Quadrangles, 1996, DMG Open
File Report 96 -02.
4. Sampo Engineering, 2005, Concept Plan, 1007 -1021 Hermes Avenue, Leucadia, California,
Scale 1 " =30'.
5. U.S.G.S., 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Topographic Map, Encinitas, Digitized, Variable Scale.
APPENDIX A
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
TABLE I
Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content
(Laboratory Standard ASTM D- 1557 -91)
Sample Max. Dry Optimum
Location Density Moisture Content
(ncf)
B -1 @ 1.0' -4.0'
126.2
TABLE II
Field Dry Density and Moisture Content
10.2
Sample
Field Dry
Field Moisture
Location
Density
Content
(Dcf)
W
B -1 @ 4.0'
112.9
7.8
B -1 @ 5.0'
SPT
7.8
B -1 @ 8.0'
102.5
8.8
B -1 @ 9.0'
SPT
8.2
B -1 @ 12.0'
102.5
18.2
B -1 @ 13.0'
SPT
16.7
B -1 @ 16.0'
SPT
25.0
B -1 @ 19.0'
SPT
25.9
B -2 @ 4.0'
99.4
6.3
B -2 @ 5.0'
SPT
6.3
B -2 @ 8.0'
112.3
15.4
B -2 @ 9.0'
SPT
18.2
B -2 @ 13.0'
SPT
25.1
B -2 @ 16.0'
SPT
24.2
B -3 @ 2.0'
97.9
8.3
B -3 @ 4.0'
97.4
10.7
B -3 @ 6.0'
113.1
12.5
B -3 @ 8.0'
101.3
11.9
B -3 @ 10.0'
104.0
18.1
(Page 1 of 2)
TABLE II(Continued)
Field Dry Density and Moisture Content
Sample
Field Dry
Field Moisture
Location
Density
Content
cf
%
B -4 @ 2.0'
103.5
8.5
B -4 @ 4.0'
97.6
8.1
B -4 @ 6.0'
88.4
7.5
B -4 @ 8.0'
98.4
6.3
B -4 @ 10.0'
Lost Sample
B -5 @ 2.0'
113.4
9.0
B -5 @ 4.0'
104.6
9.3
13-5 @ 6.0'
100.7
9.3
B -5 @ 8.0'
98.3
10.3
B -6 @ 2.0'
98.3
5.6
B -6 @ 5.0'
106.4
6.4
B -6 @ 7.5'
Lost Sample
B -6 @ 10.0'
101.0
7.8
TABLE III
Direct Shear Test Results
Sample Location Angle of Apparent Cohesion
Internal Friction 0 (Osf)
B -1 @ 1.0' -4.0' 30 Degrees 120
(Remolded)
P- 470085
(Page 2 of 2)
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO. 1
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE HOLLOW -STEM AUGER
PROJECT NO. P470085
BORING DIAMETER: 6.0"
DATE DRILLED: 09 -07 -05
SURFACE ELEV.: 85' (Approximate)
LOGGED BY: MB
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
140 POUND HAMMER, 30" DROP
C
r
x
w
ZO
h
x
3
w
0.
H
i
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO.2
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE HOLLOW -STEM AUGER
PROJECT NO. P470085
BORING DIAMETER: 6.0"
DATE DRILLED: 09 -07 -05
SURFACE ELEV.: 82' (Approximate)
LOGGED BY: MB
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
140 POUND HAMMER, 30" DROP
X
x
F
h
O
3
aw
~yC
a
W
C�
U
O vi
U
GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
82.
0.00
SP
SOIL(Qs): Brown fine and medium - grained send, slightly silty
Soil is loose with roots
i
B0.
2.00
78.
99.4
6.3
4.00
Loose
SPT
63
7
76.
6.00
SP
TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Tan to Reddish bm., fine and med. -grain
sand
112.3
i 15.4
e 00
@ 8' -9', Seepage
From 9', Whitish tan fine and med.- grained sand,
SPT I
18.2
21
little or no cohesion
72.
Medium Dense
10.
70.
1z
SPT
25.1
50
Dense
68.
14.
V se End of Boring @ 16.5'
6.
SPT
24.2
50V
SHM i of 1 COAST GEOTECHNICAL
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO.3
L
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE BUCKET AUGER
PROJECT NO. P- 470085
BORING DIAMETER: 3.5"
DATE DRILLED: 09 -06 -05
SURFACE ELEV.: 82' (Approximate)
LOGGED BY: MB
r
itt
M
N
U
Q
O
vi
y
1
0
U
Q
mj
.ate
a
h
H4
GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
ez.o o
f
0.00+
SM
FILL (af): Tan to bm. fine and medium - grained sand, dry, loose
1
I
SP
SO IL(Qs): Brown fine and medium - grained sand, slightly silty
81.
I
�
1.00
80.
97.9
I 8.3
2.00
79.
I
3.00
78.
97.4
10.7
4,00
SP
TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Tan to Reddish bm., fine and med.- grained sand
it
O
5.00
slightly clayey, very moist
d
76.
113.1
12.5
6.00
0
°
z
75.
7.00
74..00
101.3
11.9
9.00
I
s
From 10', Tan fine and medium- grained sand little or no cohesion
104.0 I
18.1
71
End of Boring @ 10.5'
10.
SHE] 1 OF 1 COAST GEOTECHNICAL
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO.5
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE BUCKET AUGER
PROJECT NO. P- 470085
BORING DIAMETER: 3.5"
DATE DRILLED: 09 -06 -05
SURFACE ELEV.: 82' (Approximate)
LOGGED BY: MB
I
e
P
U
F
p
3
w
N
L��7yG
U
Q
LQ
U
VI
O
Q
y
y
Q
'U
fO/1
GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
a :.
l
0.00 SP
SOEL(Qs): Brown fine and medium - grained sand, slightly silty
SO.
113.4
9.0
z.tw
graditional contact
SP
TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Tan to Reddish brn., fine and med.- grained sand
7a.
104.6
9.3
4.00
slightly clayey, moist
f
d
76.
100.7
9.3 I
y
6.00
O
Y
98.3
10.3
9.00
C�
0
72.00::_:.
_
m =
From 10', Tan fine and medium- grained sand little or no cohesion
i2.
End of Boring ®14'
68.
14.00
SHEET 1 OF 1
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
_jOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO, 6
DRILL RIG: PORTABLE BUCKET AUGER
PROJECT NO. PA70085
BORING DIAMETER: 3.5"
DATE DRILLED: 09 -06 -05
SURFACE ELEV.: 82' (Approximate)
LOGGED BY: MB
z
3
a
F.."
U
µtU,
W
,W.7
W
U
vQQi
I
W
ca
a
a
S
U
GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
82.
0.00
SP
SOIL(Qs): Brown fine and medium - gained sand, slightly silty
St..
dry, loose
1.00
80.
98.3
5.6
2 -00
graditional contact
SP
TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Tan to Reddish bm., fine and med.- grained sand
79.
3.00
dry
78.
4.00
77.
106.4
6.4
5.00
76.
6.00
slightly clayey, moist
00
Last
Sample
71
s.00
@ 8.8' Seepage
—
73.
—
9.00
72.
101.0
7.8
to.
End of Boring @ 10.5', Caving to 9'
s'MEr' Or' COAST GEOTECHNICAL
1 1
15' LOT 1 3 j) GARAGE j= GARAGE
W LOTAREA
GROSS/NET LOT 2 -
1 2,856 SF ! LOT AREA
18 1 3,033 SF
r Mw'
'Sf Mq� 1
PRIVATE STREET
1
m -
s
313'[ I
LO:SF
B—+2 �° , LOOT LOT
LOT Vi {� GROSSNET i' -
GRO 1,621 SF w.x
3,23
i• 1
•,,. +•'�. �`� Gs M1 —
GARAGE
AL
N
!
LOT 5
LOT IL
CUL -DE -SAC
LOTAREA
7,649 SF
�� =
•N-I
F =•�;,_
TERRACE
DEPOSITS
r_
�-•
_
�vered by soil & in ppr
�I
j}
}, •.
Is,
i
GARAGE
-
i.
j
LOT 9
!
1
1
LOT AREA
� �. 1
LJ
G.4
RAGE '
r
i
i vat SF
l ;
i
I
LOT 10
LOT
I
j
LOT 8 B
: S.
AREA
GROSS NET
,
LOT AREA
2,010 SF
J-
GARAGE
3
GARAGE
GROSSNET
3,379 SF
i
Qs
i Qs
d j
!
,
s
i
CONCEPT PLAN
SCALE: V =30'
LEGEND
BORING LOCATION (approx.)
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
P-470085
LOT 5
-
LOTAREA
�� =
k
ET
.1,3 00SF
�I
j}
Is,
!
s:
� �. 1
cuwryfnnF•..
on.mr
G.4
RAGE '
r
i
d j
,
i
G•r Miy
°in ^�
GARAGE
1-
w
-
.>s
1
LOT
B —S !
c
LOT AREA
GROSS NET
^i
'!
1 + 1
4,064 SF
1®' -
1 1
L
_.._.._.._..
r.se
v.se 1
i
LOT 7
1
uYF ARI\
1
OSSNI I'
"
1°
4.240 SF
^1
1
I
1
1
COAST GEOTECHNICAL
P-470085
APPENDIX B
CALIFORNIA FAULT MAP
STALEY
150
100
50 '
0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
-450
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
irrrirrrirrr rriiitii iri
i *
* U B C S E I S
r r
* Version 1.03
i r
•rir ++ + * + ++ ++ii+ #iiiiii
COMPUTATION OF 1997
UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
JOB NUMBER: P- 470085
JOB NAME: STALEY
FAULT - DATA -FILE NAME: CDMGUBCR.DAT
SITE COORDINATES:
SITE LATITUDE: 33.0668
SITE LONGITUDE: 117.3006
UBC SEISMIC ZONE: 0.4
UBC SOIL PROFILE TYPE: SD
NEAREST TYPE A FAULT:
NAME: ELSINORE- JULIAN
DISTANCE: 43.7 km
NEAREST TYPE B FAULT:
NAME: ROSE CANYON
DISTANCE: 4.9 km
NEAREST TYPE C FAULT:
NAME:
DISTANCE: 99999.0 km
SELECTED UBC SEISMIC COEFFICIENTS:
Na: 1.0
Nv: 1.2
Ca: 0.44
CV: 0.78
Ts: 0.699
To: 0.140
DATE: 09 -25 -2005
---------------------------
SUMMARY OF FAULT PARAMETERS
--------------------- - - - - --
Page i
APPROX.ISOURCE
I
MAX.
I SLIP
I FAULT
ABBREVIATED
IDISTANCE1
TYPE I
MAG.
I RATE
I TYPE
FAULT NAME
I (km)
I(A,B,C)l
(Mw)
I (mm /yr)
I(SS,DS,BT)
ROSE CANYON
1 4.9
1 B 1
6.9
1 1.50
1 SS
NEWPORT- INGLEWOOD (Offshore)
15.5
B 1
6.9
1 1.50
SS
CORONADO BANK
29.3
B
7.4
3.00
SS
ELSINORE - JULIAN
43.7
A
7.1
5.00
SS
ELSINORE- TEMECULA
I 43.7
B
6.8
5.00
SS
PAWS VERDES
64.0
B
7.1
3.00
SS
ELSINORE -GLEN IVY
64.2
B
6.8
5.00
SS
EARTHQUAKE VALLEY
68.2
B
6.5
2.00
SS
SAN JACINTO-ANZA
80.5
A
7.2
12.00
SS
SAN JACINTO -SAN JACINTO VALLEY
83.0
B
6.9
12.00
SS
NEWPORT- INGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin)
83.4
B
6.9
1.00
SS
SAN JACINTO- COYOTE CREEK
85.7
B
6.8
4.00
SS
CHINO- CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore)
86.7
B
6.7
1.00
DS
ELSINORE-COYOTE MOUNTAIN
88.2
B
6.8
4.00
SS
ELSINORE - WHITTIER
93.0
B
6.8
2.50
SS
SAN JACINTO - BORREGO
104.2
B
6.6
4.00
SS
SAN JACINTO -SAN BERNARDINO
105.7
B
6.7
12.00
SS
SAN ANDREAS - Southern
111.9
A
7.4
24.00
SS
SAN JOSE
120.1
B
6.5
0.50
DS
PINTO MOUNTAIN
122.7
B
7.0
2.50
SS
CUCAMONGA
124.3
A
7.0
5.00
DS
SIERRA MADRE (Central)
124.4
B
7.0
3.00
DS
SUPERSTITION MTN. (San Jacinto)
128.7
B
6.6
5.00
SS
BURNT MTN.
130.2
B
6.5
0.60
SS
NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (West)
132.1
B
7.0
1.00
DS
CLEGHORN
134.3
B
6.5
3.00
SS
EUREKA PEAK
134.6
B
6.5
0.60
SS
ELMORE RANCH
134.8
B
6.6
1.00
SS
SUPERSTITION HILLS (San Jacinto)
136.4
B
6.6
4.00
SS
ELSINORE-LAGUNA SALADA
137.5
B
7.0
3.50
SS
RAYMOND
138.8
B
6.5
0.50
DS
NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (East)
139.1
B
6.7
0.50
DS
CLAMSHELL- SAWPIT
139.5
B
6.5
0.50
DS
SAN ANDREAS - 1857 Rupture
139.9
A I
7.8
34.00
I SS
VERDUGO
142.6
B
6.7
0.50
DS
HOLLYWOOD
145.6
B
6.5
1.00
DS
LANDERS
147.1
B
7.3
0.60
SS
HELENDALE - S. LOCKHARDT
150.4
B
7.1
0.60
SS
BRAWLEY SEISMIC ZONE
151.7
B
6.5
25.00
SS
SANTA MONICA
152.9
B
6.6
1.00
DS
LENWOOD- LOCKHART -OLD WOMAN SPRGS
156.0
B
7.3
0.60
SS
MALIBU COAST
157.0
B
6.7
0.30
DS
EMERSON So. - COPPER MTN.
159.6
B
6.9
0.60
SS
JOHNSON VALLEY (Northern)
160.3
B
6.7
0.60
SS
IMPERIAL
( 162.3
A
7.0 I
20.00
SS
SIERRA MADRE (San Fernando)
163.4
B
6.7
2.00
DS
---------------------------
SUMMARY OF FAULT PARAMETERS
--------------------- - - - - --
Page 2
---' -----------------------------------------------------------------
1 nooenv I anrm, I uwv I &,r I owm m
ABBREVIATED
IDISTANCEI
TYPE
I MAG.
I RATE
I TYPE
FAULT NAME
I (km)
I(A,B,C)I
(Mw)
I (mm /Yr)
I(SS,DS,BT)
ANACAPA -DUME
165.2
B
7.3
I 3.00
DS
SAN GABRIEL
166.4
B
I 7.0
I 1.00
SS
PISGAH - BULLION MTN.- MESQUITE LK
169.3
I B
I 7.1
I 0.60
SS
CALICO - HIDALGO
173.1
I B
I 7.1
I 0.60
SS
SANTA SUSANA
I 178.7
I 8
6.6
5.00
DS
HOLSER
187.6
I B
6.5
0.40
US
SIMI -SANTA ROSA
194.9
I B
6.7
I 1.00
DS
OAK RIDGE (Onshore)
195.8
I B
6.9
4.00
DS
GRAVEL HILLS - HARPER LAKE
203.9
I B
6.9
0.60
SS
SAN CAYETANO
204.3
B
6.8
I 6.00
DS
BLACKWATER
219.2
I B
6.9
0.60
I SS
VENTURA - PITAS POINT
222.8
B
6.8
1.00
DS
SANTA YNEZ (East)
I 224.1
B
7.0
2.00
SS
SANTA CRUZ ISLAND
230.5
B
6.8
1.00
DS
M.RIDGE- ARROYO PARIDA -SANTA ANA
I 233.6
E
I 6.7
0.40
DS
RED MOUNTAIN
236.6
B
6.8
2.00
DS
GARLOCK (West)
240.9
A
7.1
I 6.00
I SS
PLEITO THRUST
246.0
B
I 6.8
2.00
I DS
BIG PINE
251.6
B
6.7
0.80
I SS
GARLOCK (East)
255.7
I A
7.3
7.00
I SS
SANTA ROSA ISLAND
265.1
I B
6.9
1.00
I DS
WHITE WOLF
i 266.7
B
I 7.2
I 2.00
DS
SANTA YNEZ (West)
I 268.4
B
6.9
I 2.00
SS
So. SIERRA NEVADA
I 280.1
B
7.1
I 0.10
DS
LITTLE LAKE
I 284.7
I B
6.7
I 0.70
I SS
OWL LAKE
285.1
B
I 6.5
I 2.00
SS
PANAMINT VALLEY
285.4
B
I 7.2
I 2.50
SS
TANK CANYON
I 286.3
I B
I 6.5
I 1.00
I DS
DEATH VALLEY (South)
293.8
B
I 6.9
I 4.00
SS
LOS ALAMOS -W. BASELINE
310.4
B
I 6.8
I 0.70
I DS
LIONS HEAD
328.1
I B
I 6.6
I 0.02
I US
DEATH VALLEY (Graben)
I 335.5
I B
I 6.9
I 4.00
DS
SAN LUIS RANGE (S. Margin)
337.9
I B
I 7.0
I 0.20
DS
SAN JUAN
339.1
I B
I 7.0
I 1.00
I SS
CASMALIA (Orcutt Frontal Fault)
I 346.2
B
I 6.5
I 0.25
I DS
OWENS VALLEY
I 353.1
B
I 7.6
1.50
I SS
LOS OSOS
I 368.1
B
I 6.8
I 0.50
DS
HOSGRI
373.8
B
7.3
I 2.50
SS
HUNTER MTN. - SALINE VALLEY
i 379.4
B
I 7.0
I 2.50 I
SS
DEATH VALLEY (Northern)
388.9
I A
I 7.2
I 5.00
SS
INDEPENDENCE
389.0
I B
I 6.9
0.20
DS
RINCONADA
389.2
B
7.3
1.00
SS
BIRCH CREEK
445.3
B
6.5
0.70
DS
SAN ANDREAS (Creeping)
445.9
B
5.0
34.00
SS
WHITE MOUNTAINS
449.8
B
7.1
1.00
SS
DEEP SPRINGS I
468.3 I
B I
6.6 I
0.80 I
DS
---------------------------
SUMMARY OF FAULT PARAMETERS
--------------------- - - - - --
Page 3
ABBREVIATED
FAULT NAME
DEATH VALLEY (N. of Cucamongo)
ROUND VALLEY (E. of S.N.Mtns.)
FISH SLOUGH
HILTON CREEK
ORTIGALITA
HARTLEY SPRINGS
CALAVERAS (So.of Calaveras
MONTEREY BAY - TULARCITOS
PALO COLORADO - SUR
QUIEN SASE
MONO LAKE
ZAYANTE - VERGELES
SAN ANDREAS (1906)
SARGENT
ROBINSON CREEK
SAN GREGORIO
GREENVILLE
MONTE VISTA - SHANNON
HAYWARD (SE Extension)
ANTELOPE VALLEY
HAYWARD (Total Length)
CALAVERAS (No.of Calaveras
GENOA
CONCORD - GREEN VALLEY
RODGERS CREEK
WEST NAPA
POINT REYES
HUNTING CREEK - BERRYESSA
MAACAMA (South)
COLLAYOMI
BARTLETT SPRINGS
MAACAMA (Central)
MAACAMA (North)
ROUND VALLEY (N. S.F.Bay)
BATTLE CREEK
LAKE MOUNTAIN
GARBERVILLE- BRICELAND
MENDOCINO FAULT ZONE
LITTLE SALMON (Onshore)
MAD RIVER
CASCADIA SUBDUCTION ZONE
McKINLEYVILLE
TRINIDAD
FICKLE HILL
TABLE BLUFF
LITTLE SALMON (Offshore)
Res)
Res)
APPROX.ISOURCE I MAX.
DISTANCE TYPE I MAG.
(km) j(A,B,C)j (Mw)
473.4
A
7.0
480.4
B
6.8
488.2
B
6.6
506.5
B
6.7
530.4
B
6.9
530.8
B
6.6
535.8
B
6.2
538.3
B
7.1
539.1
I B
7.0
549.1
B
I 6.5
566.8
B
6.6
567.6
B
6.8
572.8
A
7.9
572.9
I B
6.8
598.0
B
6.5
613.7
A
7.3
622.8
B
6.9
623.0
B
6.5
623.2
I B
I 6.5
638.4
B
6.7
642.9
A
7.1
642.9
B
6.8
663.7
B
6.9
690.8
I B
6.9
729.5
A
7.0
730.4
B
6.5
748.2
B
6.8
753.0
B
6.9
792.3
I a
I 6.9
809.2
B
6.5
812.8
A
7.1
833.9
A
7.1
893.5
A
7.1
899.7
B
6.8
923.5
B
6.5
958.2
B
6.7
975.3
B
6.9
1031.5
A
7.4
1038.3
A
7.0
1041.1
B
I 7.1
1045.2
A
I 8.3
1051.5
B
7.0
1053.1
B
7.3
I
1053.5
B
6.9
1058.9
B
7.0
1072.2
B
7.1
SLIP
FAULT
RATE
TYPE
(mm /yr)
I(SS,DS,BT)
5 00
SS
1.00
DS
0.20
DS
2.50
DS
1.00
SS
0.50
DS
15.00
SS
0.50
DS
3.00
SS
1.00
SS
2.50
DS
0.10
I SS
24.00
SS
3.00
SS
0.50
DS
5.00
SS
2.00
SS
0.40
DS
3.00
SS
0.80
DS
9.00
SS
6.00
SS
1.00
DS
6.00
SS
9.00
SS
1.00
SS
0.30
DS
6.00
SS
9.00
I SS
0.60
SS
6.00
SS
9.00
SS
9.00
SS
6.00
I SS
0.50
DS
6.00
SS
9.00
SS
35.00
DS
5.00
DS
0.70
DS
35.00
DS
0.60
DS
2.50
DS
0.60
I DS
0.60
DS
1.00
it DS
DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM
2.50
2.25
2.00
M
0.25
0.00
Seismic Zone: 0.4 Soil Profile: SD
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Period Seconds
1.75
0
co
1.50
L
1.25
U
Q
1.00
cu
0.75
U
a
0.50
M
0.25
0.00
Seismic Zone: 0.4 Soil Profile: SD
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Period Seconds
APPENDIX C
GRADING GUIDELINES
Grading should be performed to at least the minimum requirements of the governing agencies,
Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code, the geotechnical report and the guidelines presented
below. All of the guidelines may not apply to a specific site and additional recommendations
may be necessary during the grading phase.
Site Clearine
Trees, dense vegetation, and other deleterious materials should be removed from the site. Non -
organic debris or concrete may be placed in deeper fill areas under direction of the Soils
engineer.
Subdrainaee
During grading, the Geologist and Soils Engineer should evaluate the necessity of placing
additional drains.
All subdrainage systems should be observed by the Geologist and Soils Engineer during
construction and prior to covering with compacted fill.
Consideration should be given to having subdrains located by the project surveyors.
Outlets should be located and protected.
Treatment of Existing Ground
All heavy vegetation, rubbish and other deleterious materials should be disposed of off
site.
All surficial deposits including alluvium and colluvium should be removed unless
otherwise indicated in the text of this report. Groundwater existing in the alluvial areas
may make excavation difficult. Deeper removals than indicated in the text of the report
may be necessary due to saturation during winter months.
3. Subsequent to removals, the natural ground should be processed to a depth of six
inches, moistened to near optimum moisture conditions and compacted to fill standards.
Fill Placement
Most site soil and bedrock may be reused for compacted fill; however, some special
processing or handling may be required (see report). Highly organic or contaminated
soil should not be used for compacted fill.
(1)
2. Material used in the compacting process should be evenly spread, moisture conditioned,
processed, and compacted in thin lifts not to exceed six inches in thickness to obtain a
uniformly dense layer. The fill should be placed and compacted on a horizontal plane,
unless otherwise found acceptable by the Soils Engineer.
3. If the moisture content or relative density varies from that acceptable to the Soils
engineer, the Contractor should rework the fill until it is in accordance with the
following:
a) Moisture content of the fill should be at or above optimum moisture. Moisture
should be evenly distributed without wet and dry pockets. Pre - watering of cut
or removal areas should be considered in addition to watering during fill
placement, particularly in clay or dry surficial soils.
b) Each six inch layer should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum
density in compliance with the testing method specified by the controlling
governmental agency. In this case, the testing method is ASTM Test Designation
D- 1557 -91.
4. Side -hill fills should have a minimum equipment -width key at their toe excavated
through all surficial soil and into competent material (see report) and tilted back into the
hill. As the fill is elevated, it should be benched through surficial deposits and into
competent bedrock or other material deemed suitable by the Soils Engineer.
5. Rock fragments less than six inches in diameter may be utilized in the fill, provided:
a) They are not placed in concentrated pockets;
b) There is a sufficient percentage of fine - grained material to surround the rocks;
c) The distribution of the rocks is supervised by the Soils Engineer.
6. Rocks greater than six inches in diameter should be taken off site, or placed in
accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Engineer in areas designated as
suitable for rock disposal.
7. In clay soil large chunks or blocks are common; if in excess of six (6) inches minimum
dimension then they are considered as oversized. Sheepsfoot compactors or other
suitable methods should be used to break the up blocks.
8. The Contractor should be required to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90
percent out to the finished slope face of fill slopes. This may be achieved by either
overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction
of the slope face with suitable equipment.
(2)
If fill slopes are built "at grade" using direct compaction methods then the slope
construction should be performed so that a constant gradient is maintained throughout
construction. Soil should not be "spilled" over the slope face nor should slopes be
"pushed out" to obtain grades. Compaction equipment should compact each lift along
the immediate top of slope. Slopes should be back rolled approximately every 4 feet
vertically as the slope is built. Density tests should be taken periodically during grading
on the flat surface of the fill three to five feet horizontally from the face of the slope.
In addition, if a method other than over building and cutting back to the compacted
core is to be employed, slope compaction testing during construction should include
testing the outer six inches to three feet in the slope face to determine if the required
compaction is being achieved. Finish grade testing of the slope should be performed
after construction is complete. Each day the Contractor should receive a copy of the
Soils Engineer's "Daily Field Engineering Report" which would indicate the results of field
density tests that day.
9. Fill over cut slopes should be constructed in the following manner:
a) All surficial soils and weathered rock materials should be removed at the cut -fill
interface.
b) A key at least 1 equipment width wide (see report) and tipped at least 1 foot into
slope should be excavated into competent materials and observed by the Soils
Engineer or his representative.
C) The cut portion of the slope should be constructed prior to fill placement to
evaluate if stabilization is necessary, the contractor should be responsible for any
additional earthwork created by placing fill prior to cut excavation.
10. Transition lots (cut and fill) and lots above stabilization fills should be capped with a four
foot thick compacted fill blanket (or as indicated in the report).
11. Cut pads should be observed by the Geologist to evaluate the need for overexcavation
and replacement with fill. This may be necessary to reduce water infiltration into highly
fractured bedrock or other permeable zones,and /or due to differing expansive potential
of materials beneath a structure. The overexcavation should be at least three feet.
Deeper overexcavation may be recommended in some cases.
12. Exploratory backhoe or dozer trenches still remaining after site removal should be
excavated and filled with compacted fill if they can be located.
Grading Observation and Testing
1. Observation of the fill placement should be provided by the Soils Engineer during the
progress of grading.
(3)
2. In general, density tests would be made at intervals not exceeding two feet of fill height
or every 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. This criteria will vary depending on soil
conditions and the size of the fill. In any event, an adequate number of field density
tests should be made to evaluate if the required compaction and moisture content is
generally being obtained.
3. Density tests maybe made on the surface material to receive fill, as required by the Soils
Engineer.
4. Cleanouts, processed ground to receive fill, key excavations,subdrains and rock disposal
should be observed by the Soils Engineer prior to placing any fill. It will be the
Contractor's responsibility to notify the Soils Engineer when such areas are ready for
observation.
5. A Geologist should observe subdrain construction.
6. A Geologist should observe benching prior to and during placement of fill.
Utility Trench Backfill
Utility trench backfill should be placed to the following standards:
1. Ninety percent of the laboratory standard if native material is used as backfill.
2. As an alternative, clean sand maybe utilized and flooded into place. No specific relative
compaction would be required; however, observation, probing, and if deemed
necessary, testing may be required.
3. Exterior trenches, paralleling a footing and extending below a 1:1 plane projected from
the outside bottom edge of the footing, should be compacted to 90 percent of the
laboratory standard. Sand backfill, unless it is similar to the inplace fill, should not be
allowed in these trench backfill areas.
Density testing along with probing should be accomplished to verify the desired results.
(4)
N
W— _E Samao Enzineerim!, Inc.
I Land Planning, Civil Engineering, Surveying, Mapping
s
0
DRAINAGE STUDY
FOR
TPM/CDP 05-169
117 i
1007 -1021 HERMES AVENUE
LEUCADiA, CA 92024
APN: 254- 32543,44,45
May 9, 2008
j.n. 07 -125
1034 Second Street ♦ Encinitas, CA 92024 ♦ phone: 760436-0660 ♦ fax: 760436 -0659
info@sampoengmeermg.com
N
t
Samno Engineering, Inc.
Land Planning, Civil Engineering, Surveying, Mapping
j.n.07 -125
s May 9, 2008
DRAINAGE STUDY FOR: TPM/CDP 05-169,1007-1021 Hermes Avenue,
Leucadia, CA 92024, APN: 254 -325- 43,44,45
Criteria:
1. Use the current County of San Diego Hydrology Manual "Rational Method ".
2. Design for a 100 -year frequency storm using the County of San Diego 6 hour and
24 hour precipitation isopluvials.
3. Runoff coefficients are based on soil type "D ". "C" factors have been weighted
based on the individual "C" factors for different surfaces (i.e. concrete= 0.95), and
the areas of the individual surfaces.
4. Times of concentration (Tc) are determined from the urban overland flow
formula.
5. Refer to the attached drainage map for basin areas and locations.
Introduction:
1. The subject property is 0.973 gross acres and is located on the easterly side of
Hermes Avenue approximately 800' north of the intersection with Leucadia
Blvd., in the City of Encinitas. The property is currently developed with multiple
dwelling units and associated improvements such as hardscape, landscaping, etc.
The property ascends from Hermes Avenue at an approximate grade of 3 percent
to the easterly limit of the subject property. A portion of the neighboring property
directly to the east drains onto the subject property. This project proposes to
maintain the historical drainage patterns.
2. The project proposes to construct nine new residences on the subject property.
The project will include attached garages, flatwork, retaining walls, and planter
areas. All driveways, private streets, and all on -site flatwork are to be constructed
of porous concrete to reduce impervious surface area Grass -lined swales are to
be constructed around the perimeter of the private road for post- construction BMP
purposes. In addition, grass strip areas will be constructed in all private
driveways. The post - developed runoff from the property is approximately 2.3 cfs. The
pre- developed runoff is approximately 2.5 cfs, a decrease of 0.2 cfs is expected.
3. The project proposes less than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface area for
driveways (4,300 square feet of impervious area for driveways), thereby
classifying the project as "medium priority."
1034 Second Street ♦ Encinitas, CA 92024 ♦ phone: 760 -436 -0660 ♦ fax: 760436 -0659
info@sampoengumnng.com
DRAINAGE STUDY CALCULATOR
JN:
DATE:
INITIALS:
DESCRIPTION: All of the subject property tributary to Hermes Avenue
AREA =
42,400.00 SF = 0.973 AC.
C =
0.3509871 SF) + 0.95(22529 SF)
= 0.67
42400 SF
Tc1 =
1.8(1.1- .35)(601A(1/2)
10.46
=
= 9.35
(1.4)A(1/3)
1.12
Tc2 =
1.8(1.1 - .95)(205)"(1/21
3.87
=
= 2.55
(3.5)A(l/3)
1.52
Tc = Tc1 + Tc2 = 9.35 +
2.55 = 11.9
1100 =
7.44(2.5)(11.9)^( -.645) =
3.77 IN/HR
100 =
(0.67)(3.77 IN/HR)(0.973 AC)
= 2)6? , , '..
MINUTES
MINUTES
MINUTES
JN:
DATE:
INITIALS:
DESCRIPTION: All of the subject property tributary to Hermes Avenue
AREA =
42,400.00 SF =
0.973 AC.
C =
0.35(13.504) + 0.56(14.574)
+ 0.95(14 3221
=
0.62
42,400 SF
TC1 =
1.9(1.1- .35)(55) "(1 /2)
10 01
= =
10.01
(1.0) ^(1/3)
1.00
Tc2 =
DISTANCE
246
_ =
2.04
VELOCITY
2 fps'60 s/min
Tc = Tc1 + Tc2 = 10.01
+ 2.04 =
12.1
Itoo =
7.44(2.5)(12.1)^( -.645)
= 3.73 IN /HR
too = (0.62)(3.73 IN /HR)(0.973 AC) _ ;Z4` rl
Summary: Net decrease in runoff is anticipated due to proposed redevelopment
MINUTES
MINUTES
MINUTES
DESCRIPTION: Off -site basin tributary to subject property
AREA =
C=
66,339 SF = 1.523 AC.
0.65
Tcl =
1.8(1.1- .35)(245) "(1/2) _
21.13
(7-4)-(1/3)
1.95
Tc2 =
60 FT _
60
(2 FPS)(60 S /MIN)
120
Tc =
TO + Tc2
=
1100--
7.44(2.5)(11.3)A( -.645) =
188
100 =
(0.65)(3.88 IN /HR)(1.52 AC)
_
JN:r
DATE:.
INITIALS:
= 10.8 MINUTES
0.5 MINUTES
11.3 MINUTES
IN /HR
3.8 CFS
May 9, 2008
j.n. 07 -125
Hydraulic Calculations
Qmax =3.8• ft3 — (Conservative value of stormwater quantity)
s
Q Capacity for 12 "x17' PCC Catch Basin
Grate open surface area = 126.24 W2
126.24•in2 = 11.236 -in
11.236-in-4 = 44.944 -in
P = 3.745 ft perimter
Divide by 2 for clogging
P = 3.745 -ft
2
P = 1.873 -ft
C : =3.0 constant
H =0.4 ft depth of water
3
QcaP = C-P-H2
Qcap = 1.42 clfs
Qmax /Qcap = 3.811.42 = 2.7
Therefore, three 17'x17' catch basins required to catch off -site drainage. Use four catch
basins equally spaced in PCC browditch along easterly property line.
1" 20'
o ,o za 40
LEUCADICA GROVE L XX -G
1007 -1021 NERMES AVENUE
2
ti
MAP FO
LEUCADICA GROVE
1007 -1021 HERMES AVENUE
�Ab>a
(7i PRJFOSN QtAlfl S N£ ANO PAflNM'G AREA
l(7 AV JRCUS CIXIfR£2 PAH4a')AIPo 9AY BW
m PMNCAD CbVLWf2dMKIWY1q]II (1J 1
W0. MASS SIRW 6W ARCAS (i1Pf
�8
�boemaB
DRAWING N0.
0
XX -G
SHEET 2 OF 2