Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1993-3460 G
THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT When Recorded Mail To: WAS RECORDED ON 2P-I -19lti t DOCUMENT NUMBER 1994- OZ66779. City e ) GREGORY SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER City of Encinitas ) SRH DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S DFFICE 505 South Vulcan Avenue j Encinitas, CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY WAIVER OF PROTEST TO ASSESSMENTS Assessor's Parcel No. 256 - 051 -10 Project No.: 3460 GI Case No.: 93 -051 MUP A. Charles L. Clayton, Trustee, Clayton Family Trust under Date of Trust March 1, 1977 ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as 638 Neptune Avenue (PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of Major Use Permit 93 -051 by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. cov3942 10e40 1 JAN 90 I E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. F. Failure of OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. G. Upon OWNER Is satisfaction of OWNER's duties and obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and CITY shall execute a Satisfaction of Covenant. H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: O ER Dated ell y,-o ,� `., ,Ly Dated (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached.) CITY OF ENCINITAS Dated y(� �C�� by (Notarization not required) ity Manager TF /03 /AG9- 410wp51 (01- 11 -93) 10e40 1 JAN 90 ATTACHMENT A TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY PROJECT NO. 3460 GI PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 14, Block "E" South Coast Park Unit No. 3, according to Map thereof NO. 1935, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, August 17, 1926, and as more fully described in the Exhibit "A" attached hereto and being made a part hereof. EXHIBIT "A" Lot 14 in Block "E" of South Coast Park No. 3, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof NO. 1935, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, August 17, 1926. Also that portion of Block "E" of South Coast Park No. 3, in the in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1935, August 17, 1926, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 14, Block "E", said South Coast Park No. 3; thence Westerly along the Westerly prolongation of the Northerly line of said Lot 14; Block "E" to a paint on the Easterly line of that Tract of Land as conveyed by the South Coast Land Company to the County of San Diego, by Deed Dated January 10, 1930 and recorded in Book 1731, Page 256 of Deed; thence Southerly along said Easterly line of the County Land to its intersection with the Westerly prolongation of the Southerly linesof said Lot 14, Block "E", thence Easterly along said Westerly prolongation to the Southwest corner of said Lot 14, Block "E"; thence Northerly along the Westerly lines of said Lot 14, Block "E" to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion, if any heretofore or now lying below the mean high tide line of the Pacific Ocean. ATTACHMENT B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY PROJECT NO. 3460 GI OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS No protest shall be made by the owners to any proceedings for the installation, acquisition, or maintenance of bluff improvements under any special assessment proceedings, whether conducted pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911, the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, a Geological Hazard Abatement District, or any other applicable state or local law, and whether processed by the City of Encinitas or any other governmental entity having jurisdiction in the matter and for the purposes of determining property owners support for same. m13944 l: I 1 I V r r. B U 1 V 1 1 H J ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 3460TE PARCEL NO. : 256- 051 -1000 FLAN NO.: 3460 -G 3OB SITE ADDRESS: 638 NEPTUNE AVE. APPLICANT NAME CLAYTON (CHARLES L.) ADDRESS: 12785 AMARANTH ST. 92129 PHONE NO.: 619- 484 -021 CONTRACTOR : SOIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INC. PHONE NO.: 310 - 831 -0298 LICENSE NO.: 268082 LICENSE TYPE: A INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: LONDON COS. POLICY NO. : CB34610 POLICY EXP. DATE: 10/01/94 ENGINEER : CIVIL ENGINEERIING CONSULTANTS PHO7 NO -619-944-4124 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: PERMIT EXP. DATE: 194 PERMITt ISSTJED BY ------------------- - - - - -- FE�;MIT FEES & DEPOOITS 1. APPLICATION FEE .00 Inspector shall charge time to 3764TE. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 Damage Deposit assigned to 3764TE now 3. ADDL. INSPECTIONi . ,10 assigned to 3460TE. 4. SE*,TJ I'i'z DEPOSIT . 00 (Inspection: $700.00. Damage: $5,000.00) ------------------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORM ----------------------- -- - - - - -- .fi C F J.J TO 4Lti r 1K_ _ 1 Jb Y T I Y T a 1 BEACH. . I 1 r T IUV: .A _ UM GRANT OF BEACH :ACCESS /CON -TRACTOR LIAETT TTI LETTER /WORK SCHEDUZIE /BEACH ACCESS, EwUPMENT & BARRIER PLANS /STANDARD & SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Warranty retention of Damage Deposit required. - - -- INSPECTION - --------- - - - --- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATTJRE [Todd Baumbach] INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPE'''TION Final Inspection Approvals required. ------------------------------------------------------ -- ----------------- - - - --- UND : T a THAT TLiE tT� TV OF ENC IN IT aS L TT; _ TZ E; A COST RECOVERY EY -M,T F017 . PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION, AND THAT IF PROJECT COTS EXCEED DEPOSITS, THE APPLICANT SHiaLL V C I E TJ -N B aLAQ EP � r TO RE L EASL OF SE, - r.ITY. I HAVE •'.AP..".: T- : Y E S3I�1IIdED '�1? CI�?4 'T E° ELI PERMIT = AIVE, DO HEP Z-V r CERTIFY TTNDE-L; Lh^�.TAT Tt; ,:;F PEP..77I Y THAT :ALL THE INFORMATI� IrT I? -rTTF _ I unders d and accept hat the Damage Deposit is a Warranty Deposit that will b k t for a Tod not to exceed four years from September 1 of the year of win ple on. J - .22 -9y JATT: T,!�- -,-rD 1906 7-2. -,,,,v CO (�'/ ! ?j4-0Z(Z PRINT NAME �HOTIE NtTMEE ; City Of Encinitas COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR PERMIT NO. 3460 TE 1. Permittee shall provide a Certificate of Public Liability Insurance with the City of Encinitas listed as an additional insured in the amount of $1,000,000. 2. Permittee shall post a Financial deposit Instrument from a company approved by the City, in the amount of $5,000 prior to entering upon City Property, to ensure all terms and conditions of the permit are fully met. 3. Permittee shall deposit to the City the sum of $700 for the use of City Property. This deposit will be used to pay for the cost of inspecting the City Property. 4. Permittee shall provide a detailed plan, which must be approved by the City prior to the Permittee entering upon City Property. The plan shall include times the City Property will be used, types of vehicles which will be used, thelnumber of trips vehicles will make. Work schedule received yr+� (i'( Other documents received December 8, 1993. 5. A notarized letter shall be provided, indicating the Contractor will be liable for any costs to correct damages to the beach or adjacent areas resulting from your work. Also included in the letter shall be a statement of understanding that debris washing onto the beaches within one mile north or south of the site is assumed to be construction debris and shall be removed by the Contractor at no expense to the City. Construction debris is defined as any limber, piling, poles, crates, boxes, containers, and other objects which could be used for constru g,t. n similar to that being used on the site. Document received YCOr1 2 o(41 6. Advanced notifications shall be provided to the Office of the Park and Beach Superintendent (619) 633 -2746, a minimum of 48 hours prior to each access period through Moonlight Beach. Notification shall include date(s), time(s), equipment types and duration of work. A single notification shall not include more than one week of work at any given time. 7. Staging or repairs of equipment or supplies is prohibited on City Property or right -of -ways. m14002 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 TEL 619-633 -2600 / FAX 619 -633 -2627 / TDD 619 -633 -2700 00L recycled paper 8. An approved copy of the Coastal Commission Permit, other appropriate City permits and letter authorizing the Contractor to proceed on the project shall be provided. 9. These conditions do not exempt the Contractor or Agency of any future fees or charges for access through the beach area. 10. Any entrance gates used to gain access through the beach area shall be immediately locked after access. Any ruts or berm damage to sand areas shall be immediately and repeatedly repaired to remove any public safety hazards. 11. Violations of any standard or special conditions will result in notification of the Sheriff's Department for appropriate action. 12. Permittee shall present a beach barrier plan to protect public from equipment movement, co truction activity and construction site. Document receivedT 13.. The existing winter season berm and drainage system of Moonlight Beach State Park shall be maintained in good working order on a continuous basis, and any breach to the berm due to the operations of the permittee shall be properly sandbagged before the end of the current low tide period. 14. Permittee shall remove debris from the public beach on a daily basis or within the maximum period of twenty -four hours from when requested to do so by an authorized representative of the City, whichever occurs first. 15. The existing rip -rap at the base of the coastal bluff near 638 Neptune Avenue shall either be removed from the public beach or placed by the outlet of Cottonwood Creek. The latter option shall be accomplished only after specific direction has been given and supervision arranged by both the Director of Engineering Services and the Superintendent of Parks and Beaches. 16. A solid waste container of sufficient size shall be made available and conveniently accessible to Lifeguard Services so that debris removed from the public beach may be immediately and safely stored. Permittee shall be responsible for regular monitoring, maintenance and cleaning of this facility. 17. Prior to placement of any concrete product at the base of the coastal bluff, the permittee shall indicate to the City Inspector what methods are to be used to dewater the job site. 18. Permittee shall delineate the accessway through Moonlight Beach State Park to the satisfaction of the City Inspector and Superintendent of Parks and Beaches. m14002 19. Permittee shall restore or replace on a daily basis any signage regulating handicap person's access disrupted, damaged or destroyed by permittee's operations. 20. Permittee shall not block at any time access to the public beach for emergency personnel or vehicles. 21. Permittee shall obtain special permission from the Superintendent of Parks and Beaches prior to placement of asphalt cement pavement on the public beach. A diagram showing dimensions of the pavement and relationship to existing features shall be provided. Any such pavement shall be assumed to have a temporary status and shall be removed by the Permittee upon demand from the City Inspector and the Superintendent of Parks and Beaches. 22. Prior to final inspection approval of this permit by the Superintendent of Parks and Beaches, permittee shall regrade the public beach to the contours existing prior to issuance of this permit with the exception of the seawall itself. 23. Prior to final inspection approval of this permit by the Superintendent of Parks and Beaches, permittee shall either replenish all beach sand lost due to permittee's operations or compensate the Parks and Beaches Division by contributing to future sand replenishment projects. 24. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the Traffic Engineering Division for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the Traffic Engineering Division may impose with regards to the hauling operation. m14002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA -THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON. G..., CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION — SAN DIEGO COAST AREA 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH. SUITE 300 SAN DIEGO. CA 91108 -1725 (619) 5218036 Bob Trettin 12785 Amaranth Street San Diego, CA 92129 NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE Date: April 21, 1994 Applicant: Chuck Clayton Document or APR 21 1994 ENC�TY FS OF ENC N TAS March 23, 1994. Submitted in compliance with Special Condition(s) No(s). 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 9 of Coastal Development Permit No. 6- 93 -36 -G Material submitted in compliance with said Special Condition(s) of your development permit has been reviewed by the District Director and found to fulfill the requirements of said condition(s). Your submitted material and a copy of this letter have been made a part of the permanent file. Sincerely, Charles Damm (4357N) t 1 c s i I i STATE OF CAUFORN1A —THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Co.m , CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION S*N DIEGO COAST AREA s 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92109 -1723 (619) 521 -8036 Bob Trettin n LS ` L 1' 12785 Amaranth Street �'JnU� { San Diego, CA 92129 APR 2 1994 NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE ENGINEERING C NITASES Date: April 18 1994 Applicant: Chuck Clayton nl rrmman* nr the stipulated agreement. Submitted in compliance with Special Condition(s) No(s). 4 of Coastal Development Permit No. 6- 93 -36 —G Material submitted in compliance with said Special Condition(s) of your development permit has been reviewed by the District Director and found to fulfill the requirements of said condition(s). Your submitted material and a copy of this letter have been made a part of the permanent file. (4341N) Sincerely, Charles Damm District Director By: STATE Of CALIFORNIA —THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Go.m , CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAid DIEGO COAST AREA 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH. SUITE 200 • - SAN DIEGO, CA 912108-1725 (619) 5214036 Bob Trettin 12785 Amaranth Street San Diego, CA 92129 NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE Date: March 31, 1994 Applicant:_ Charles L. Clayton Document or IL uU APR 21 1994 ENC�TY ES OF ENC NITAS Submitted in compliance with Special Conditions) No(s). 1. 8 & 11 of Coastal Development Permit No. 6- 93 -36 —G Material submitted in compliance with said Special Condition(s) of your development permit has been reviewed by the District Director and found to fulfill the requirements of said condition(s). Your submitted material and a copy of this letter have been made a part of the permanent file. Sincerely, Charles Damm Ois By: (4326N) •IFORNIAITHE RESOURCES AGENCY NIA COASTAL COMMISSION ' i OAST AREA j DEL RIO JORTH. SUITE 200 t :L 92108-1723 )) � k fij i APR 21 ,b Tretti n ENGINEERING SERVICES 785 Amaranth Street CITY OF ENCINITAS .n Diego, CA 92129 OTTCE OF ACCEPTANCE ' Lte: March 8 1994 )plicant: Chuck Clayton — i xument or lans: 1 ubmitted in compliance with Special Condition(s) No(s). 13 f Coastal Development Permit No. 6- 93 -36 —C laterial submitted in compliance with said Special Condition(s) of your evelopment permit has been reviewed by the District Director and found to 'ulfili the requirements of said condttion(s). Your submitted material and a :opy of this letter have been made a part of the permanent file. Sincerely, Charles Damm Di B) (4275N) Y 4 .. fi .. l� I 6 i CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO COAST AREA 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 -1723 (6141 521.8036 Bob Trettin 12785 Amaranth Street San Diego, CA 92129 NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE Date: March 6 1994 Applicant: Charles L Clayton Document or Plans: 1. APR 21 1994 ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS Submitted in compliance with Special Condition(s) No(s). 1(b) of Coastal Development Permit No. 6- 93 -36 -G Material submitted in compliance with said Special Condition(s) of your development permit has been reviewed by the District Director and found to fulfill the requirements of said condition(s). Your submitted material and a copy of this letter have been'made a part of the permanent file. Sincerely, Charles Damm District Director By: (4330N) STATE OF CALIFORNIA —THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Go.. CAL4FORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO COAST AREA 7111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 6--93-36-G SAN DIEGO, CA 9210&1725 Page 1 of 7 (614) 5219076 dD p %�01 Vpj On November 18. 1993 the California Coastal Commis �t+Z+094 t this permit for the development described below, subjectO r � ?- VRCCES Standard and Special Conditions. �INIT Description: Construction of a 65 ft. long, 38 ft. high shotcrete seawall with tiebacks at the base of a bluff fronting a 5,243 sq. ft. site containing an existing single- family residence. Also proposed is a slope erosion control device, to be located above the seawall, consisting of redwood beams secured with rock anchors. Lot Area 5,243 sq. ft. Zoning R -8 Plan Designation Residential (5 -8 dua) Site: 638 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, San Diego County. APN 256 - 051 -10 Issued on behalf of the California Coastal Commission by PETER DOUGLAS Executive Director and IMPORTANT: THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID[UN S AND UNTIL A COPY OF THE PERMIT WITH THE SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT HAS BEn RETURNED TO THE COMMISSION OFFICE. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned permittee acknowledges receipt of this permit and agrees to abide by all terms and conditions thereof. Date Signature of Perm ttee COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 6- 93 -36 —G Page 2 of 7 STANDARD CONDITIONS: Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgement. The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. 2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. 3. Compliance. All development must occur in strict compliance with the proposal as set forth below. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Commission approval. 4. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission. 5. Inspections. The Commission staff shall be allowed to inspect the site and the development during construction, subject to 24 —hour advance notice. 6. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 7. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The permit is subject to the following conditions: 1. Final Plans. Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall submit for the review and written approval of the Executive Director, final plans for shoreline protection for the site. Said plans shall first be approved by the City of Encinitas and include the following: a. Said plans shall be in substantial conformance with the plans submitted with this application dated 12/16/92 by Earth Systems Design Group. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 6- 43 -36 —G Page 3 of 7 SPECIAL CONDITIONS, continued: b. Said plans shall indicate that the proposed shoreline protective device shall conform as closely as possible to the contours of the bluff, and shall be designed to incorporate surface treatments that resemble the color and texture of adjacent natural bluff areas (e.g., air —blown concrete). Detailed information shall also be provided on the construction method and technology to be utilized for texturing and coloring the wall. Plans shall be of sufficient detail to provide assurance that the herein approved wall will closely match the adjacent natural bluff. Said color shall also be verified through submittal of a color board, subject to review and written approval of the Executive Director. c. All riprap placed on the beach pursuant to the emergency permit shall be removed from the site within 30 days of completion of the herein permitted shoreline /bluff protective work. d. Said plans shall indicate that disturbance to sand and intertidal areas shall be minimized. Beach sand excavated shall be redeposited on the beach. Local sand, cobbles or shoreline rocks shall not be used for back —fill or construction material. 2. Lateral Public Access. Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, the landowner shall execute and record a document, in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director, irrevocably offering to dedicate to a public agency or private association approved by the Executive Director an easement for lateral public access and passive recreational use along the shoreline. The document shall provide that the offer of dedication shall not be used or construed to allow anyone, prior to the acceptance of the offer, to interfere with any rights of public access acquired through use which may exist on the property. Such easement shall be located along the entire width of the property from the western property line to the toe of the seawall. The recorded document shall include legal descriptions of both the applicant's entire parcel(s) and the easement area. The document shall be recorded free of prior liens and other encumbrances which the Executive Director determines may affect the interest being conveyed. The offer shall run with the land in favor of the People of the State of California, binding all successors and assignees, and shall be irrevocable for a period of 21 years, such period running from the date of recording. 3. Beach Sand Replenishment Fund Prior to issuance of the coastal development permit, each applicant shall provide evidence, in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director, that a fee of no less than $10,184 and no more than $42,575 has been deposited in an interest bearing account designated by the Executive Director, in —lieu of providing sand to COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT N0. 6- 93 -36 —G Page 4 of 7 ���SS�I����ar�c�r►� • , replace the sandy beach area that would be lost due to the impacts of the proposed protective structure. The methodology used to determine the appropriate mitigation fee for the subject site(s) shall be that described in the Staff Report dated 11/3/93 for coastal development permit no. 6- 93 -36 —G. The California Coastal Commission shall be named as trustee of this account, with all interest earned payable to the account for the purposes stated below. The purpose of the account shall be to establish a beach sand replenishment fund to aid SANDAG, or a Commission — approved successor —in— interest, in the restoration of the beaches within San Diego County. The funds shall coley be used to implement projects which provide sand to the region's beaches, not to fund operations, maintenance or planning studies. The funds shall be released only upon approval of an appropriate project by the Executive Director of the Coastal Commission. The funds in the account shall be released as provided for in a memorandum of agreement between SANDAG, or its Commission — approved successor —in— interest, and the Commission, setting forth terms and conditions to assure that the in —lieu fee will be expended in the manner intended by the Commission. 4. Future Shoreline Protective Devices. Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, each applicant shall record a deed restriction in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director, which shall provide that in the event that any additional bluff or shoreline protective work is proposed in the future, the applicant acknowledges that, as a condition of filing an application for a coastal development permit, the applicant shall not only be required to provide information that analyzes the proposed project's consistency with Section 30235 of the Coastal Act, but shall provide to the Commission or its successor agency an analysis of alternatives to bluff protective works that may be considered by the Commission or its successor agency in the event that it finds that the proposed project does not comply with Section 30235. The alternatives shall include, but not be limited to, relocation of the principal residence in its entirety, relocation of portions of the residence that are threatened, structural underpinning, or other remedial measures identified to stabilize the residence that do not include bluff or shoreline stabilization devices. The document shall be recorded and shall run with the land and bind all successors and assigns. 5. Community Wide /Regional Solution to Shoreline Erosion. Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, each permittee(s) shall execute and record a deed restriction, which shall provide that the permittee(s), or successor —in— interest, shall agree to participate in the implementation of any comprehensive program contained in the City's certified Local Coastal Program (LCP) addressing a community — wide /regional solution to the shoreline erosion problems in Encinitas. The permittee(s), or successor —in— interest, also agree to participate in any assessment district or other means to implement the LCP's solution to the shoreline erosion problems. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 6- 93 -36 —G Page 5 of 7 SPECIAL CONDITIONS, continued: The responsibility of participation in the community — wide /regional solution shall run with the land binding on the prope-ty owner's successors and assigns and the above parameters shall be documented in a recorded restriction against the deed of the subject property. This restriction shall be recorded, in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director, free of prior liens or encumbrances, other than tax liens, which the Executive Director believes may affect the interest being conveyed. Evidence of recordation of this restriction shall be submitted to and acknowledged in writing by the Executive Director prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit. 6. Assumption of Risk. Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant [and landowner] shall execute and record a deed restriction to run with the land, in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director, which shall provide: (a) that the applicant understands that the site may be subject to extraordinary hazard from bluff retreat and erosion and the (b) applicant hereby waives any future claims of liability against the Commission or its successors in interest for damage from such hazards. 7. Open Space Deed Restriction. Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall record a restriction against the subject property, free of prior liens and encumbrances, except for tax liens, and binding on the permitee's successors in interest any any subsequent purchasers of any portion of the real property. The restriction shall prohibit any alteration of landforms, removal of vegetation or the erection of structures of any type, ecept as herein permitted, in the area shown on the attached Exhibit #5 and generally described as the area from the top of the bluff (as depicted on the site plan by Earth Systems Design Group dated 12/16/92) to the toe of the bluff. The recording document shall include legal descriptions of both the applicant's entire parcel(s) and the restricted area, and shall be in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director. Evidence of recordation of such restriction shall be subject to review and written approval of the Executive Director. 8. Landscaping Plan. Prior to the issuance of the encroachment permit by the City of Encinitas, the applicant shall submit for review and written approval of the Executive Director, detailed landscape plans that have been approved by the City of Encinitas. Said plans shall indicate the type, size, extent and location of all plant materials proposed to be located either in the bluff setback area or on the face of the bluff, the proposed irrigation system and other landscape features. Any new proposed landscaping shall consist of drought tolerant native or naturalizing plant materials to the maximum extent feasible. Special emphasis shall be placed on the placement of salt and drought tolerant plant materials. Plans shall also indicate that any existing permanent irrigation system located within the geologic setback area (40 feet from the bluff edge) shall be removed or capped and that no landscaping (other than necessary for erosion control purposes) or accessory improvements within the setback area shall be located within five feet of the bluff edge. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT N0. 6- 93 -36 —G Page 6 of 7 SPECIAL CONDITIONS, continued: 9. Future Development. Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall execute and record a document, in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director, stating the the subject permit is only for the development described in Coastal Development Permit No. 6- 93 -36 —G; and that any future additions, or other development as defined in Public Resources Code Section 30106, will require an amendment to to permit No. 6- 93 -36 —G or will require an addition coastal development permit from the California Coastal Commission or from its successor agency. The document shall be recorded as a covanent running with the land binding all successors and assigns in interest to the subject property and be recorded free of prior liens and encumbrances. 10. Maintenance Activities /Future Alterations. The property owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the herein permitted protective devices. Any change in the design of the project or future additions /reinforcement of the seawall will require a coastal development permit. If after inspection, it is apparent that repair and maintenance is necessary, the applicant shall contact the Commission office to determine whether permits are necessary. The applicant shall be responsible for the removal of debris deposited on the beach or in the water during and after construction of the shoreline protective devices or resulting from failure or damage of the shoreline protective device. 11. Construction Access/Staging Areas /Project Timing. Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall submit plans showing the locations, which will be used as staging and storage areas for materials and equipment during the construction phase of this project. The staging /storage plan shall .be subject to review and written approval of the Executive Director. Use of sandy beach and public parking areas, including on— street parking for the interim storage of equipment and materials shall not be permitted. The plan shall also indicate that no work may occur on sandy beach during the summer months (Memorial Day to Labor Day) of any year and that equipment used on the beach shall be removed from the beach at the end of each work day. 12. Public Rights. By acceptance of this permit, the applicant acknowledges, on behalf of him /herself and his /her successors in interest, that issuance of the permit shall not constitute a waiver of any public rights which may exist on the property. The applicant shall also acknowledge that issuance of the permit and construction of the permitted development shall not be used or construed to interfere with any public prescriptive or public trust rights that may exist on the property. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 6- 93 -36 -G Page 7 of 7 SPECIAL CONDITIONS, continued: 13. Storm Design. Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall submit certification by a registered civil engineer that the proposed shoreline protective device is designed to withstand storms comparable to the winter storms of 1982 -83. Said certification shall be subject to the review and written approval of the Executive Director. In addition, within 60 says following completion of the project, the applicant shall submit certification by a registered civil engineer, acceptable to the Executive Director, verifying the seawall has been constructed in conformance with the approved plans for the project. SOIL EnGmEE:tInG consznualon.. Q/0 March 28, 1994 P ��� Iz s , 3 TO: Director, Community Services Department L' City of Encinitas APR 2 2 1994 ENGINEERING SERVICES FROM: Roger M. Zimmerman, Regional Manager CITY OF ENCINITAS Soil Engineering Construction, Inc. RE: Contractor Responsibility This correspondence is provided to acknowledge that Soil Engineering Construction, Inc., will be liable for any costs to correct damages to the beach or adjacent areas resulting from permit work undertaken by Soil Engineering Construction, Inc., for: Clayton Project 638 Neptune Avenue In addition, Soil Engineering Construction, Inc., recognizes that construction debris washing onto the beaches (during the period of time that Soil Engineering Construction, Inc., is constructing these projects) within one mile north or south of the work site shall be the responsibility of Soil Engineering Construction, Inc., and shall be removed at no expense to the City of Encinitas. Construction debris is defined as any lumber, piling, poles, crates, boxes, containers and other objects which could be used for construction identical to that being used on the project site. 3/a 319j1 ger M. Z memnan, Regional Manager Date oil Engineering Construction, Inc. +o+eoeAwAwaa aoru� "'Moo 1881 N Gaffey Street. Suite A • San Pedro. CA 90731 • (310J 831 -0298 • FAX 13 10) 831 -0578 General Engineering Contractor License A- 268082 SOIL Enaniamc conspucuon, DEC 0 8 1993 ENC��n OF ENCINITASES 11/18/93 EQUIPMENT REQUIRING ACCESS TO BEACH 1 GRAD - ALL 800 RUBBER TIRE 2 950 B WHEEL LOADER RUBBER TIRE 3 AIR COMPRESSORS RUBBER TIRE 4 STANDARD PICKUPS RUBBER TIRE 5 CONCRETE PUMPS RUBBER TIRE 6 WATER JET DRILL RUBBER TIRE 7 8 TON DECK CRANE RUBBER TIRE 8 LIGHT PLANTS RUBBER TIRE 9 BACKHOE (580 CASE) RUBBER TIRE 10 SKIP LOADER (580 CASE) RUBBER TIRE 11 FLATBED TRAILERS RUBBER TIRE 12 TRASH PUMPS RUBBER TIRE 1881 N Gaffey Street. Sufte A • San Pedro. CA 9073 I • (3 10) 831 -0298 • FAX (3 10) 831 -0578 General Enoineenno Contractor License A-268082 SEAWALL ENCINITAS BLUFFS BARRIER / STAGING PLAN ON THE BEACH DURING CONSTRUCTION HOURS: ACTUAL AREA OF WORK ESTIMATED AT 25'x 200'+/-. ONE HUNDRED FEET (100') NORTH AND SOUTH OF CONSTRUCTION AREA WILL BE CORDONED OFF BY DELINEATORS AND CONSTRUCTION SIGNS PLACED ON STANDARD WORK BARRICADES: 'VAUTION WORK AHEAD'; ETC. A WATCHMAN WEARING A FLUORESCENT VEST WILL POLICE THE DELINEATED AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION TO ASSURE THAT ALL PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC ON THE BEACH IS ROUTED AROUND THE WORK. EQUIPMENT STORAGE AT MOONLIGHT BEACH.• WHILE EQUIPMENT AT MOONLIGHT BEACH WILL BE KEPT AT A MINIMUM, ALL EQUIPMENT WILL HAVE SAFETY COLOR FENCE PLACED AROUND THE ENTIRE CIRCUNITWNCE AND AFFIXED SIGNAGE: 'DANGER KEEPOFF'(OR SIMILAR). EQUIPMENT AT NORTH EL PORTAL: xNEXXXXJPlS,$R' VKx27E3W4 ZxXRXXAk4[x'RXjck (NOT A PART OF PERMIT NO. 3460TE!) THE BULK OF EQUIPMENT STORED WILL BE AT NORTH EL PORTAL WITH SAFETY FENCE PLACED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF EQUIPMENT AND SIGNAGE TO THE EFFECT OF: "KEEP OUT- CONSTRUCTIONAREA ". e. C`J pEC C 8 ASO ENCii!Eca ENC NITS o GITY OF SOIL Enanininc conscitucclon. Dwo SEAWALL ENCINITAS BLUFFS BEACH ACCESS / STAGING PLAN AT NORTHEL PORTAL, ST.: (NOT A PART OF PERMIT NO. 3460TE!) EQUIPMENT WILL BE STORED AT THIS SITE AND STAGED FOR EGRESS TO THE BEACH AT MOONLIGHT BEACH. THERE MAY BE A SERVICE CRANE AT THIS SITE TO LOWER MATERIALS TO THE BEACH DIRECTLY BELOW. A CONSTRUCTION TRAILER WILL BE LOCATED AT THIS SITE. AT MOONLIGHT BEACH: WHILE EQUIPMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE STAGED OR STORED AT MOONLIGHT BEACH, THIS DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE POSSIBILITY THAT EQUIPMENT WILL BE TEMPORARILY STAGED AT 3RD OR B STREETS WHILE WAITING TO ACCESS THE BEACH. IF EQUIPMENT IS LEFT ON CITY STREETS, IT WILL BE SECURED AS MENTIONED IN THE BARRIER / STAGING PLAN. EQUIPMENT WILL ACCESS THE BEACH AT THE NORTHERN -MOST POINT OF MOONLIGHT BEACH AS DESIGNATED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND /OR CITY OF ENCINITAS (SEE APPROX LOCATION ON MAP ATTACHED). DEC C 6 1993 ENCIIY ES OF ENCINITAS SOIL Enclnae3lnc conse3ucclon. R /lD I l f i i I h fvY'ab�1 s � R I v m `I e Im 1 so ✓o a I I r I Q Z P. y. ✓u� ±gil�y �SM� � ,wm-; ' I I O a' � em :r v ,.,._ Din � C � ..�' � • l n - �N015�1M _ nVI V, AM] Or, I s� v ...•v iE1�V +lam nV '~``% H'\ I� N i �7'. •� °< I �-ti . +�T + , �'' -{� 00 \\ A11 +• � "�LL�� +� rr4 =: C� t� N19. o R Yt•3 "+ �' ip r Ga1004 y OH''"c C � L� AN ti ". Hlb yu, * N D� S�E\d s rA = e oa o I z is • I ■� L5 r Ory DOD DeA g N� n Ycc i N' o a r g k SN Y N v .-- i P nw!P�61�.- - — Vf :NIRA ... C I _ S i� •v'H ARROYO, D VIA NANCITA 71 s -�� CUR cic,• r„�rryn iwl 00 1 1 R O i a SAN DIEGUI70 DR P ,�']Vrn I C,1d ,r tl N uGs VMY I D N I ❑R - -, I • MIRA A 900 Av • U w N yy STPATFORD a pq N3 L� L�]I ��y RIEG V 9 fT1 DEVONSHIRE PD m I ZHj v19 7 RI 7iA 1iAMAN, i ; ■ II = I Hr� a a_ vNf\'40 2 I $A %ONV I ut t m p ' N �UV✓] I� I.k m fit NON I C Yi17 1 OVA, RD ::. -.I� m , u REGAL RD (( � u I p I C REGA 'MS urw. I I'•�:E�•,•i_ O 1 r GOLDEN RD L )AM ARDENA RD a Fr[DR _ 1 "•t$ e �`I D AI ':. ;'riz:'•:.. <; '::,.. IDR r i .➢IlD Uut m I _ C \RCADIA RD att AR n ��� / �< O a •T I •� ��J I a F'. ',� 3k3:aa I [r 110 BE A 0 �Im -I_ I^� p L'a,[rtowen I I r ; °C 7[[Rk I I� ._Q psi SRACERO RD CAN OE O OAM'*+` t ..DEV1m+nnl w I ... •...' Tast.o N , v CAM_ EL QORA00. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ a � c ° C - RO EeAr DR BON A pp I FRAXINEILA ST _, —I t' PRINC EHOU SE I 1 d 4 LH AVO 0E MET AUC� SAN CLEMEN _ NAN ?,LOUR • 4 6 °s p 100' I I ,s •✓' - i �i- 7 n 1 713 - - - - -� —yam I � I CD r 3. SEE PLAN VIEW THIS SHT. a 2 , cfom _ 3,. , », .:,OL. 1Rf.Cl11W 1K m111fAr 11K a I I i I r II/ � I11 L., I � I I� ST I, Ilhfi II, I C ` '► I ,III 1 Ili\ �������• \�� CC, LOT 16 W r I E �� 11 1 Ir r� l 111 iJ�li►.�i!I �'h�.a�!�I �i!I�d' I 4 I f Ix 9.53 ►a w r �1 I I i w w.n I-� tlaa romnrr 1 1 I I ,I 97.82 j I II one I l I pr I I�l �IIII I I �r I 1 ' I I� I Ir fl! 1/ J Con c A �Ilir 89.38 III I 1 �� 1 1 I 1 �I( I(� r / LOT 14 MAPI 1935 i 11 ry � I�'�ill 111 � 1 �\1 �� , `� l �`'I� �•' �'1Cal�= ���� - - -' - -�- - -1 �I— 1 Lb IL `t„� ` ,^' 11 I 1 ! i I ` lli► i fi` I� LOT 13 /$ cp < vWfTDIA Rts I'De'ice✓ 19' SITE PLAN 20 to F a 1�o aF Ln T1 a i !? w 049 N "6.1- . �Q r Z k a r 89.12 }1 x si w z w 1 Z M — 91kA r A 'I 88.68 1 I � I I I � I � - I I r } IL -� I I �J ar �- . .. i1C' � / � �, r - _ ` .: yrTM r if'i .'��� �Y '4,`f..� ^' A.i .iG+1ss � •N <`. 'r' w 3� �� d �r -' f,.�.., r•' .�C i n ��' 7` ail.' y "' 8 .1.694 HIGH ' AND l OW WFTER PJaE y�a%.ti.�,n��]• > 4� >M a ', 'Sr i f i �" ;�^�,�a•, •�.' -Qf. '.�y '4•y��'1� '_w�_ Coast of North -:and f�• h' America "`Including the Hawaiian Islands 7. �: �t'..,k... ;•�: if __ { r Far � 4 � ..j, �`• 1' _ `•s • t fiiY -••t '...... .P r .: = .•.v- G'tc.i -0 ..• :3i.,•7 ..I 1�'Nr ..�..� •. �' n 1. .m.... :4`TW .: .N.._n; ... 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service _.:.. . I . San Diego, California, 1994 Times and Heights of High and Low Waters 65 April May June Time He'9ht T,me Heig "t T. ve Heighl T HNgM Lme He•9t11 Time H,�g -1 176 1 6 155 16 0714 12. 16 0817 125 007.6 -0.2 1774 7 0 01 0616 -0 2 6 a 21 ].6 110 W 0930 0 B Tn 0 7 F 1426 74 104 Sa 1719 25 76 Su 1531 40 122 M 1650 2.8 05 t629 49 149 t5t5 50 152 1901 2.3 70 2037 25 76 2258 1.7 52 o 2144 17 52 7509 17 110 2 147 17 1.9 2 6023 174 17 0315 37 133 2 0906 00 5d 0156 06 M 0935 O6 TV OA 12 01 Tn 11 1 F 0916 10 -- Sa 1609 3.6 Ito 1519 31 94 1636 4.3 171 1521 40 122 1712 32 156 16C9 56 1 0 2048 2.5 76 18+2 2 6 65 Q 2215 2 2 07 2016 26 79 2357 t_2 77 2702 0 9 27 0257 a 9 u9 is 0 14 .+ 134 3 0150 a 3 131 18 0200 42 128 3 05+0 3 5 107 18 0450 3 7 113 3 102s 00 0 0912 06 16 +015 03 0 W 0912 0. 12 F flog 14 47 SI 1017 13 4D S 1721 4 0 t:2 M 1613 3 4 104 TV 1724 4 7 1.7 1612 4 5 137 1748 5 4 165 1700 6 1 185 2232 23 70 0 2059 2 6 05 2727 1.6 49 Q 22C9 20 61 0475 4 e t46 19 0251 A ,T q OSOS 4 2 128 19 O] +1 4 0 22 q 0047 07 71. 19 0004 0 t 3 q 1127 -0.1 -J IOt7 04 12 ItxS 05 ,S T6 tC09 06 18 Sa 0640 ] 6 110 Su 0609 76 116 6. 1809 4 4 134 Tu 1714 3 9 119 W 1802 5 0 152 ,655 5 1 155 1151 1.6 49 1116 1 5 45 2347 1.e 55 2235 22 67 2318 12 37 182T 5.7 17+ 1750 66 2C1 0$34 4 9 149 20 0419 44 134 5 0019 1 1 34 20 0504 a 1 125 5 0122 D2 6 20 0058 -07 -21 5 1215 -0 1 -3 1109 0 2 6 0606 a 7 128 ,107 O 6 18 Su 0720 7 7 , 3 0713 40 122 ru 1845 40 lab ty 1)48 a5 177 T6 1206 06 16 F ,737 5.7 174 1226 17 52 5I 1212 1.6 49 2338 15 46 1014 53 162 1852 5.9 160 IBIS 71 215 00]5 12 37 21 0529 47 147 6 0101 06 10 21 0014 03 9 6 0156 -02 6 21 0140 -13 -40 6 0628 5 0 152 1154 0 1 3 0656 4 2 128 0613 + ] 171 34 0610 7.6 t t6 TV a 7 13' IV 1253 -01 -3 Tn 1820 51 155 F 1240 05 24 Sa 1151 0.7 21 1702 10 SS I 1304 16 +9 1916 51 155 1902 56 171 let? 6.3 192 1922 6.1 186 1925 7a 226 O1t6 06 24 22 0028 06 t0 0177 02 6 22 0105 -0.6 -16 7 0229 -04 -12 22 0234 -t 7 -52 071 ] S O 157 0627 a 9 149 0779 4 2 128 Su 0713 4 a 114 TV 0846 3.8 I,b w 0858 4 5 137 7 1323 0 1 3 F 1274 0 0 0 54 1310 1.0 70 1237 0 9 27 I3 35 1.9 S6 1754 t 6 a9 1942 5 3 162 1054 S 0 177 1928 5 8 177 less 6 6 207 1951 6.2 169 2011 7.5 229 0152 23 B 23 0808 i s i7 8 0924 a.9 23 0319 is 8 t 4 9 1.9 0220 6 i 1 s oe i i sis W 119 Tn 140 F 1757 0.2 6 54 loll 0, 3 Su 1338 1.2 37 M 17I3 1.0 20 1406 2.0 61 7442 1.6 49 2007 S'S 166 1929 63 192 1953 5.9 too 1941 72 219 2023 67 192 0 2056 7.4 226 0224 01 3 24 02 ^1 0 -30 9 0242 -04 -12 24 0240 -1.8 -55 9 0334 -07 -21 24 0402 -1.7 -52 g 0626 a.6 246 0611 5 2 156 0853 4.1 125 0900 46 140 Tn 0959 3.r i :9 F 1029 4 7 147 Sa 1416 OS +5 Su 1753 03 0 M 1405 1-4 4J Tu +408 1.2 37 1439 2.t 6a 1571 4.7 52 2030 66 177 2006 66 207 2018 6.0 187 0 2024 7.4 226 0 2054 6.3 192 2u0 7.0 213 1035 Old' Su0 0900 4.6 NO u5 0901 50 132 TO 0928 40 122 W5 0956 4�5 137 FO 3.9 129 55 114 4.7 U3 1442 07 21 1432 05 15 143 16 49 7457 1.4 47 1513 2.2 67 1620 1.6 SS 20S2 5? 174 0 2045 7.0 2T3 0 2045 6.o 103 2108 7.3 227 2127 5.2 169 2224 65 Ise 0325 -02 - 26 11 03,46 26 1047 ;58 11 1113 ;21 26 0525 7 11 0973 4 4 124 0952 4 0 146 004 3 e 116 TI, 4 a 14 Sa 3.9 9 Su 200 a 143 M 1505 t.0 30 TV 1517 0.6 2a W 1157 18 SS 1541 1.6 49 1551 23 70 7772 20 61 Vie 3.7 174 2126 7.D 213 2112 60 167 215+ 7.0 213 2201 6.0 183 2709 56 177 0357 27 0424 12 27 0504 12 0517 i�0 27 1217 12 006 4.2 123 046 4 5 137 1027 37 117 177 4 7 U9 Su 154 122 M a.7 ta] TV 1527 1.3 a0 W 1556 12 37 T11 1525 20 61 F 1632 1.9 58 1675 24 73 1611 22 67 2140 56 17+ 2210 so 207 2142 so 177 2241 61 196 2240 5.7 174 2356 5 1 155 291545 131125 261115 i3 41 12 131042 0e l e .5 105 05 poi Iii 61,31239 125 TZV Me tU W 1550 16 49 Tn 76 +3 t.) 52 F 1556 2.2 67 54 1770 2.2 67 1771 2.5 76 1921 2.3 70 2207 6.S 168 2258 63 107 2214 6.6 171 2732 35 177 2326 52 155 0;508 29 06514 14 2g 1130 4 0637 124 14 24 0 5 107 25] 3 9 119 1255 7 4 104 43 121 T 328 43 131 wg 0730 0 8 7[ 6 t. 19 SB F 1740 2, 64 SI 1634 24 73 Su 1640 24 72 1844 2.5 76 1429 48 146 2236 57 162 2357 5 7 174 2252 5.4 165 2046 22 67 30 15 30 0719 750 072. 0.3 149 30 0816 13 1 0 15 1151 iz 99 1.,; 0s tis 1126 0. wi -o± v15 Th 1641 2.2 67 SI 1856 2.4 73 Su 1727 26 79 M 1439 4.4 IN 1121 a.6 140 _1522 49 149 2712 so 152 2119 5.0 152 2007 2.4 73 2017 2.2 67 O 2215 1 9 56 31 Deis 44 112 TV . Tu 1578 4 6 140 0 21]9 22 67 LOWER BLUFF SEAWALL-CLAYTON RESIDENCE it 17 - 2t Mav 1 w 8 Mav is A4 22 Duuioo P S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T SI+N T I F S S M T m 1 Name LAYOUT WALL Zd I Rol - I ® I ' 4 Z 2 SHAPE BLUFF R PREP FOOTRvG 5d 3 DRILL UPPER d: LOWER TERACYS Sd EXCAVATE FOOTING Sd 5 PUCE REBAR/DRAC•LAGE B POUR TO El. 0' 24 6 PLACE REBAR1LYtAIKAGE& POUR TO II.-W f 2d 7 PUCE RFEAR/DRAR4AGE d POUR TO II. +17 2d a I i � om EM I � 8 PLACE RFF13eRlMRAMAC;E & POUR TO D. *18' 2d 9 PLACE REPAR/ORALNA(E t pOL12T0II. t2s' Zd 10 PLACE RE MRMRAINAGE &. POUR TO II. •3V 11 PLACE REBAR/DRARfAG£ R POURTO El. �3T � 2d 12 IWALL COMPLETION I ld � • ,� 2 � 1994 i I pQR �. orNC;v1T�S CSiTM I �P%mj�cct: ower HIaII Sc, "U C'h ! P-"ideaee il 11,1" NoacriNcal Mlleamae ♦ Rn11ed Alp O Page 1 i v CITY OF ENCINITAS ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVENUE ENCINITAS, CA 92024 -3633 (619) 633 -2770 FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS BEACH ENCROACHMENT PERMITS PERMIT NO. 3460 TE Please note: This form must be completed and returned to your Engineering Inspector BEFORE YOU REQUEST A FINAL INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT. Project address(es) 638 Neptune Avenue Project description Access to iobsite across public beach. Note that damage deposit for this permit is also security & warranty retention for related Permits authorizing construction. APPROVALS OF THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO REQUESTING A FINAL INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT. ( ) ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT: 633 -2780 (PUBLIC SERVICE COUNTER) [after consideration of status of all related permits issued by this Department) ( ) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT: (PLANNER, OLD ENCINITAS) BY ( ) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT: (LEUCADIA PLANNER) BY ( ) COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT: (PARK AND BEACH SUPERINTENDENT) BY ( ) ENCINITAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: (FIRE MARSHAL) BY m13847 DATE 633 -2712 DATE 633 -2714 DATE 633 -2746 DATE 633 -2821 DATE 1 I INSURANCE AGENT (213) 947 -2966 (714)979.3672 CHUCK CLAYTON 16165 EAST WHITTIER BOULEVARD • WHITTIER. CALIFORNIA 90603 To: City of Encinitas Department of Engineering I, Charles L. Clayton, authorize Bob Trettin to sign any and all permits associated with the seawall project at my home located at 638 Neptune Avenue. Signed, Charles L. Clayton, Tru tee o `- 5i APR 11994 ENG1V OF ENC NT ASES CITY OF ENCINITAS �- ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION 3 460 T> JOB SITE ADDRESS 638 Neptune Ave. STREET ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Clayton. Charles L. NAMEC/O Sob Trettin, Principal The Trettin Co. MAILINGADDRESS12785 Amaranth St. San Dieao, CA 92129 CITY, STATE, ZIP (619) 484 -0212 TELEPHONE NO. CIVIL ENGINEER INFORMATION Civil Engineering Consultants NM5 Vulcan Ave. South, Suite 206 ADDRESS Encinitas, CA 92024 (619) 944 -4124 CITY, STATE, ZIP TELEPHONE NO. RCE C22096 Charles John Randle REGISTRATION NO. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 256- 051 -10 CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Soil Engineering Construction Inc. NAME 1881 Gaffey St. North, Suite A ADDRESS San Pedro, CA 90731 (310) 831 -0298 26 8 082 E, AZIP TELE. NO. STATE LICENSE NO. & TYPE SOILS ENGINEER INFORMATION Civil Engineering Consultants NAME 619 Vulcan Ave. South, Suite 206 ADDRESS Encinitas, CA 92024 (619) 944 -4124 CRY, STATE, ZIP TELEPHONE NO. RCE C22¢96 Charles John Randle REGISTRATION NO. DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE Access to jobsite across public beach. Documents made a part of this permit: Covenant Public Beach to Seawall Construction Site recorded /_ /_ as Document 1994- / Contractor / / Beach Access & Equipment Plans received 12 /08 /93 / /Standard & Special Condition for Permit /Beach Barrier Plan recei Dama Deposit is a Warranty Deposit that will be kept fo IG A e rs followinc completi 3 AV 9y PRCTT NAME TELEPHONE NO. �d - %y% 91 _____________ ____________ ________________ ___ - _____- __- _________ FINANCE NO: 3764TE PROCESSED BY: JSG TYPE OF APPLICATION ❑ CONSTRUCTION RX TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT (BEACH) ❑ PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT ❑ SEWER CONSTRUCTION ❑ GRADING ❑ IMPROVEMENT ❑ FINAL MAP ❑ PARCEL MAP ❑ STREET VACATION DEPOSITS AND FEES APPLICATION FEE: PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: INSPECTION DEPOSIT:Charge to 3764TE SECURITY DEPOSIT: Damage Deposit Assigned to 3764TE Assigned to 3460TE RETURN EXCESS DEPOSITS TO: ❑ OWNER ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ ENGINEER RIXOTHER none COMMENTS Reference 93 -051 MUP. Coastal Permit accepted by Property Owner required. Add work dares C l Y V b' t N U l N l 1• A J ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 3460GI PARCEL NO. : 256- 051 -1000 PLAN NO.: 3460 -G JOB SITE ADDRESS: 638 NEPTUNE AVE. APPLICANT NAME CLAYTON (CHARLES L.) ADDRESS: 1.785 AMARANTH ST. 9129 PHONE NO.: 619- 484 -0212 CONTRACTOR : SOIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INC. PHONE NO.: 310 - 831 -0258 LICENSE NO.: 26608. LICENSE TYPE: A ENGINEER : CIVIL '- - ONSULTANTS H" NC.: f 19- 944-4124 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: ` PERMIT EXP. DATE: 10/01/94 PERMIT ISSUED BY: -- ----------------- - --- -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS -- -- --- ) 1. APPLICATION FEE .00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: 1670.95 .. INITIAL PLAN CHECK: .00 5. ADDL. INSPECTION . .00 3. ADDL. PLAN CHECK .00 6. SECURITY DEPOSIT" . .00 *Security Deposit is Damage Deposit assigned to 3460TE. ___ ___ ________ ____ DESCRTIDTTON OF WORK CONSTRUCTION OF "SH O.T. C R TE" SEAWALL AT OF COASTAL BL'UFFF & SLOPE MDOS ZG N DEVT "r :�R GRADING NOTE. ATTACHED. iiS -wJ T T PLANS P OLTIP.. D. WARRANTY RE 7N TON OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT EtiE U P- J. - - -- INSPECTT, , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Todd Baumbach] INITIAL INSPECTION _ COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED T E1vGI vEEP. CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING TITSPECTI'CN FINAL INSPECTION DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNA'TU - - -- I JNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY OF ENCINITAS UTILI,ES A COST RECOVERY SYSTEM FOP: L IN CHECK: AM INSPECTION, AND THAT IF PROJECT COSTS EXCEED DEPOSITS, THZEE APPLICANT SHALL PAS' ThE OU-TSTr,N[DING BALANCE PRIOR TO RELEASE OF SECURITY. = =:i;'- -C'E AZ VT . \iT - 1Ry'. _ - T TNA T�;ES 7A T I ON IS AGREE TO COMP L Y WIT 'H A Ciy - `T _E LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND AJ G r E PR, T_ONS ANL, CONDITIONS OF �x.IN� AND THE CIS U ANY EF ISSUE--- PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. I unde)rstqhd and accept that the Damage Deposit is a Warranty Deposit that will a ept _far a period not to exceed four years from September 1 of the ye SI RC)6 l ReTrily POINT NA::Xz on. _.THEE'. y A-R -fY DATE SI3ND CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS C. J. Rundle, P.. Prtsldmt 619 sn. Vulenn Avenue, Suite 206 Encinitas, 01ifnmin 92024 Phnne•. (619) 9444124 F,,: (619) 9416043 GRADING PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR PERMIT NO. 93 -051 MUP (CLAYTON) Declaration of Responsible Charge I hereby declare that I am the engineer of work for this project, that I have exercised responsible charge over the design of the project as defined in Section 6703 of the Business and Professions Code, and that the design is consistent with current standards. I understand that the check of project drawings and specifications by the City of Encinitas is confined to a review only and does not relieve me, as engineer of work, of my responsibilities for project design. Civil En ne/eriinng Con to s V C arles Randle, P.E., President REC 22096 (Exp. date: 9/30/97) Date: / 27 % 3 No. C22096 ` Ev. Data W 97 C ft. crr. rn7n.r•Ancr 4r. 2: n? n. A7 nrr ..011971.frvnrr.#10170WArr.41n776 rNll ^.rvrinAl n.GFOI OrlY.SI➢NF�..'Filbl P11 nnrp,.W -11.Mm Ann AIAIMIAI IE$b11n. K�glnn llY :I nl )'FS .rON1RACT LI V:Afi FVPR CML ENCINEERING CONSULTANTS C. J. Randle, r.F:, rmldent 619 Sa VnIcnn Avenue, Suite 206 Encinilns, Califnrnin 92024 rhnnr. (619) 9444124 Fa%: (619) 942 -6043 GRADING PLAN CERTIFICATION FOR PERMIT NO. 93 -051 MUP (CLAYTON) SOILS ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE Ir ��-(i7 1j�tx� 7� , a registered civil engineer in the State of California, principally doing business in the field of applied soil mechanics, hereby certify that a sampling and study of the soil conditions prevalent within this site was made by me or under my direction between the dates e-16-9'z and 12-2 7 — '33 . one complete copy of the soils report compiled from this study, with my recommendations, has been submitted to the office of the City Engineer. Furthermore, I have reviewed these grading plans and certify that the recommendations included in the soils report for his project e been incorporated in the grading plans and sp i ications. SIGNED: RICE NO: �a9� z EXP. DATE: '�-�� �' ° No. C22096 m a E�. Dbe q[i4 7 11. C F. r. • e 17n . rA n r. r:. ,4r.2209n . A7 n r r .411971 . r n n r F. #1n17 . %VA r E. #111775 rryn <imrnlMl ann "nil "fIVIN Ih Ff- ri Flvp'tY.SI II NFy• 4TI I OeH 1 R IbPb.. I: ^n.M nl AtJFI MA1FnU1 IE ^III Jr, F'SIn I I Y 0 I I JI l!FS.[n N InACt!u.:Ar.F!•F+R City Of . Encinitas GRADING PLAN GENERAL NOTES FOR PERMIT NO. 93 -051 MUP A. GENERAL po13846 WORK TO BE DONE 1. All work shall be done in accordance with these plans, the standard specifications for public works construction, the design construction standards of the City of Encinitas and the San Diego area regional standard drawings. Any changes or revisions therefrom shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any request for inspection. The soils report titled Geotechnical and Geologic Investigation, Clayton Sea Bluff, 638 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, California prepared by Earth Systems Design Group dated October 26, 199L , shall be considered as a part of this grading plan. All grading shall be done in accordance with the recommendations and specifications contained in said report. 3. Approval of this plan does not constitute approval of sizes, location and type of drainage facilities, nor of 'improvements within street right -of -ways. Separate approvals and permits for these shall be required in conjunction with improvement plans. 4. Written permission shall be obtained for any off - site grading. 5. Contractor shall take any necessary precautions required to protect adjacent properties during grading operations. Anything damaged or destroyed shall be replaced or repaired to condition existing prior to grading. 6. The developer shall be responsible that any monument or bench mark which is disturbed or destroyed shall be re- established and replaced by a registered civil engineer or a licensed land surveyor. The contractor shall design, construct and maintain all safety devices, including shoring, and shall be responsible for conforming to all local, state and federal safety and health standards, laws and 505 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 TEL 619 - 633.2600 / FAX 619- 633 -26271 TDD 619 -633 -2700 � recycled paper regulations. 8. Grading and equipment operating within 1/2 mile of a structure for human occupancy shall not be conducted between the hours of 5:30 p.m. and 7:30 a.m. nor on Saturdays, Sundays and City recognized holidays unless in conformance with a work schedule approved by the Director of Engineering Services and Superintendent of Parks and Beaches. 9. No grading operations shall commence until a pregrading meeting has been held onsite with the following people present: City Inspector, Civil Engineer, Soils Engineer, Grading Contractor and Permittee. The pregrade meeting shall be scheduled with the City at least 48 hours in advance by calling (619) 633 -2770. 10. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation. 11. Upon final completion of the work under the grading permit but prior to final grading approval and /or final release of security, an as- graded certification shall be provided stating: "The grading under Permit No. 93 -051 MUP has been perforrped in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan or as shown on the attached as- graded plan ". This statement shall be followed by the date and signature of the Civil Engineer who certifies such grading operation. vol 3846 9 ;�z [oil WoO VOCSI [] 1. The existence and location of underground utility pipes and structures shown on these plans were obtained by a search of available records. To the best of our knowledge there are no existing utilities except as shown on these plans, however: The contractor is required to take due precautionary measures to protect any existing utilities or structures located at the work site. It is the contractor's responsibility to contact the following owners of said utilities or structures prior to any excavation, for verification and location of utilities and notification of commencement of work: a. Sewers - Encinitas Sanitary District b. Gas & Electric - San Diego Gas & Electric Co. C. Water - San Dieguito Water District d. Telephone - Pacific Bell e. Cable TV - Dimension Cable Services, Daniels Cablevision. These companies may be notified by calling 1- 800- 422 -4133. 2. Contractor shall notify the City Engineer's office 48 hours prior to beginning any work on this project. Phone: (619) 633 -2770. 3. The contractor shall give 24 hours notice on calls for inspection. Phone: (619) 633 -2770. All work performed without benefit of inspection will be subject to rejection and removal. C. GRADING 1. All grading shall be observed and tested by a qualified soils engineer or under his /her direction. He /She shall observe and test the excavation placement and compaction of fills and backfills and compaction of trenches. He /She shall submit soils reports as required and will determine the suitability of any fill material. Upon completion of grading operations he /she shall state that observations and tests were made by him /her or nol3846 10 Po13846 under his /her supervision and that in his /her opinion, all embankments and excavations were constructed in accordance with the approved grading plans and that all embankments and excavations are acceptable for their intended use. 2. The contractor shall properly grade all excavated surfaces to provide positive drainage and prevent ponding of water. He /she shall control surface water and avoid damage to adjoining properties or to finished work on the site and shall take remedial measures to prevent erosion of freshly graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. 3. All areas to be filled shall be prepared to be filled and fill shall be placed in accordance with standard specifications. All vegetable matter and objectionable material shall be removed by the contractor from the surface upon which the fill is to be placed. Loose fill and alluvial soils shall be removed to suitable firm natural ground. The exposed soils shall be scarified to a depth of 6" and then compacted to a minimum of 90 percent. It shall be the contractor's responsibility to place, spread, water and compact the fill in strict accordance with specifications. 4. Cut and fill slopes shall be cut and trimmed to finish grade to produce smooth surfaces and uniform cross sections. The slopes of excavations and embankments shall be shaped, planted and trimmed as directed by the engineer of work and left in a neat and orderly condition. All stones, roots and other waste matter exposed or excavation or embankment slopes which are liable to become loosened shall be removed and disposed of. The toe and top of all slopes shall be rounded in accordance with the Grading ordinance. 5. All trees, brush, grass, and other objectionable material shall be collected, piled or otherwise disposed of off the site by the contractor so as to leave the areas that have been cleared with a neat and finished appearance free from unsightly debris. Approval of location of debris fill shall be secured from the soils engineer and City Engineer prior to the disposal of any such material. 11 D EROSION CONTROL 1. In case emergency work is required, contact Bob Trettin at (619) 484 -0212 or Roger Zimmerman at (619) 944 -4124. 2. Equipment and workers for emergency work shall be made available at all times during the rainy season. All necessary materials shall be stockpiled on site at convenient locations to facilitate rapid construction of temporary devices when rain is imminent. 3. Devices shown on plans shall not be moved or modified without the approval of the Engineering Inspector. 4. The contractor shall restore all erosion control devices to working order to the satisfaction of the City Engineer after each run -off producing rainfall. 5. The contractor shall install additional erosion control measures as may be required by the City Engineer due to an incompleted grading operation or unforeseen circumstances which may arise. 6. The contractor shall be responsible and shall take necessary precautions to prevent public trespass onto areas when impounded waters create a hazardous condition. 7. All erosion control measures provided per the approved grading plan shall be incorporated hereon. 8. Graded areas around the project perimeter must drain away from the face of slope at the conclusion of each work day. 9. All removable protective devices shown shall be in place at the end of each working day when the 5 day rain probability forecast exceeds 40 %. Silt and other debris shall be removed after each rainfall. 10. Should germination of hydroseeded slopes fail to provide effective coverage of graded slopes (90% coverage) prior to November 15, the slopes shall be stabilized with punched straw installed in accordance with Section 35.023 of the Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook of the State of California Department of Conservation. 0013846 12 INSURANCE AGENT (213) 947 -2966 (714) 879.3672 CHUCK CLAYTON 16165 EAST WHITTIER BOULEVARD • WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90603 To:. City of Encinitas Department of Engineering I, Charles L. Clayton, authorize City of Encinitas representatives to access my property at 638 Neptune Avenue, for the purpose of observation or inspection, at any time during construction of the seawall project. Signed, / Charles L. Clayton, Trustee NO, 2 c^ Gl� a INSURANCE AGENT (213) 947 -2966 (714) 879.3672 CHUCK CLAYTON 16165 EAST WHITTIER BOULEVARD • WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90603 To: City of Encinitas Department of Engineering I, Charles L. Clayton, authorize Bob Trettin to sign any and all permits associated with the seawall project at my home located at 638 Neptune Avenue. Signed, Charles L. Clayton, Tru tee s APR 21 1994 ENG MEc�' CITY OF ENCINITAS February 10, 1995 Department of Engineering City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Dear Mr. Shields: SOIL 'encine'e41nc cons 'nucrlon.r. J - FEB 10 1995 ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS Storm Damage Debris Clayton Seawall 638 Neptune Avenue Temporary Encroachment Permit No. 3460 TE Encinitas, California This letter has been prepared in response to your letter dated January 30, 1995 regarding construction debris located on the beach below 638 Neptune Avenue. SEC would like to direct your attention to a permit document regarding responsibility for removal of debris deposited on the beach. The notarized document "Contractors Responsibility" dated March 28, 1994, from SEC to the Director of Community Services department, clearly defines our responsibility regarding removal of construction debris. A copy of this document is attached and should be perused. We are disappointed with your response to our concerns regarding this issue and find it hard to believe that the city of Encinitas would require our client, Mr. Charles Clayton, to pay for the removal of this debris when clearly your department knows where it originated from. We also understand that your department has visited this location and we assume that you have had conversations with the particular property owner regarding this situation. We also have observed this site, and it appears that the area above the seawall is relatively free of the construction debris and it also appears that debris may have been cleared and deposited over the wall onto the beach under the direction of the owner. Please provide us with any correspondences the city of Encinitas may have had with the owner of the property regarding dumping debris onto the beach.' We find it hard to believe that the owner did not receive any direction from your department. In addition our client, Mr. Clayton is also anxious to receive any information on this issue. Note, Soil Engineering Construction, our client Mr. Clayton, and our insurance carrier are not liable for any accidents or injuries that may occur as a result of the debris. It is in our opinion that the debris is not our responsibility, as it is not related to any of our work in the area. Please 610 "ouui Vulcan Avenue, Suite 210 • Encinitas, CA 92024 • 16191944-4124 • FAX (619) 634 -2401 General Engineering Contractor iJcense A- 268082 Clayton Seawall 638 Neptune Avenue February 10, 1995 Page 2 review the attached document which was submitted as part of the temporary encroachment permit for the Clayton seawall. Please respond in a timely manner with any information you may have. If you have any questions, do not hesitate contacting us. Very truly yours, SO GINEERING CONSTRUCnON W. Niven actor's License No. 268082 c: Mr. Alan Archibald, Director of Engineering (City of Encinitas) Mr. Hans Jensen, City of Encinitas Engineering Mr. Todd Baumbach , City of Encinitas Engineering Director of Community Services (City of Encinitas) Mr. Tom Buckner, Captain of Lifeguards (City of Encinitas) Mr. Bob Trettin F consciucrlon.. Q51 if- SOIL 2naneciilnci cons-punon. Q!D March 28, 1994 lit TO: Director, Community Services Department n APR 22 1994 City of Encinitas ENGINEERING SER`Xi a FROM: Roger M. Zimmerman, Regional Manager CITY OF ENCINITAS Soil Engineering Construction, Inc. RE: Contractor Responsibility This correspondence is provided to acknowledge that Soil Engineering Construction, Inc., will be liable for any costs to correct damages to the beach or adjacent areas resulting from permit work undertaken by Soil Engineering Construction, Inc., for. Clayton Project 638 Neptune Avenue In addition, Soil Engineering Construction, Inc., recognizes that construction debris washing onto the beaches (during the period of time that Soil Engineering Construction, Inc., is constructing these projects) within one mile north or south of the work site shall be the responsibility of Soil Engineering Construction, Inc., and shall be removed at no expense to the City of Encinitas. Construction debris is defined as any lumber, piling, poles, crates, boxes, containers and other objects which could be used for construction identical to that being used on the project site. M. Zi n Regional Manager Date action, Inc. r it �ollec�Ma+o WMANGEMCOUMV r Ir Owl �M �A � iiw 881 v --artev ::reef. SuteA • San Pearc C° =0731 • X01831-0298 • FAX;3101 831 -x572 �e ^eras Erc,neenrc == -•�ac:cr ucerse A- 268082 City Of Encinitas April 22, 1996 Mr. Chuck Clayton 16165 East Whittier Blvd. Whittier, CA 90603 SUBJECT: Case Nos.: 93 -051 MUP/EIA and 95 -048 MUP/MOD Dear Mr. Clayton: This is to acknowledge receipt of the April 2, 1996 letter from GE Construction, and to confirm that, based on the letter and based on site inspection, the project conforms with the Conceptual Landscape Plan submitted with the original project application (Case No. 93 -051 MUP/MOD) and the project complies with Condition I.B of Resolution No. PC 95 -11 related to the Major Use Permit Modification No. 95 -048. Additionally, this is to acknowledge that Lee McEachem of the Coastal Commission has informed me that final inspection approval has been granted by the Coastal Commission which satisfies Condition II.1.0 of Resoltuion No. PC 93 -21 (Case No. 90 -070 MUP/EIA). As we have previously discussed, compliance with the above items, as well as acceptance of the As- Built Engineering Reports by the Engineering Department were the only remaining items in order for the Community Development Department to grant final inspection approval. However, based on a site inspection conducted on April 12, 1996 a newly installed spotlight was observed at the top of the lower seawall. There are no provisions in the General Plan and the Municipal Code to allow spotlights on the face of the coastal bluff. Consequently, the spotlight needs to be removed prior to final inspection approval by the Community Development Department. Upon accpetance of the As -Built Engineering Reports by the Engineering Department and removal of the spotlight, the Community Development Department can authorize final inspection approval for the above - referenced project. If you have any questions in this matter please do not hesitate to contact me at (619) 633 -2714. Sincerely, Diane S. Langager Associate Planner II��JJ cc: Bill Weedman, City Planner Hans Jensen, Senior Civil Engineer Greg Shields, Senior Civil Engineer Todd Baumbach, Engineering Inspector Lee McEachem, California Coastal Commission UP- 96-021(4/22/96) TEL 619 - 633 -2600 / FAX 619 - 633 - 2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas. Califomia 92024 -3633 TDD 619 -633 -2700 recycled paper CO, of Encinitas February 23, 1996 Mr. Chuck Clayton 1616 East Whittier Blvd. Whittier, CA 90603 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Final Inspection regarding Case Nos. 93 -051 MUP/EIA and 95 -048 MUP/MOD for the lower seawall and mid -bluff wall located at 638 Neptune Avenue. Dear Mr. Clayton: This is to inform you that on February 15, 1996, the Planning Commission had a general discussion and review of seawalls requesting final approval. The discussion included your seawall located at 638 Neptune Avenue which was constructed in reliance on Major Use Permit No. 93 -051 MUP/EIA and 95 -048 MUP/MOD. As part of the discussion, the Planning Commission determined that visually the color and construction of the wall was acceptable. Based on this determination Items 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the December 13, 1995 letter to John Niven (attached) do not necessarily need to be completed prior to final inspection approval by the Community Development Department.. Staff has not inspected the wall in a few weeks; however, based on our previous phone conversations it is my understanding that the mid -bluff wall has been painted and based on a conversation with John Niven the exposed tie -backs have been covered with shotcrete. Staff appreciates your effort in completing these measures and encourages you to complete the additional painting of the lower seawall whereby the wall is more visually compatible with the surrounding bluffs. Based on the Planning Commission determination, the items remaining to be completed prior to final inspection approval by the Community Development Department are items 5 and 6 of the December 13, 1995 letter to John Niven related to landscaping and Coastal Commission approval. As a reminder, in conformance with Condition I.A.1 of Resolution No. PC -93 -22 a written report by a certified engineer assessing the condition of the seawall will be required on or before September 1, 1997 and on or before September 1 every three years thereafter. Additionally, in conformance with Condition LB of the Resolution of Approval, you are responsible for maintaining the wall in good structural and visual condition in a manner satisfactory to the Directors of Engineering Services and Community Development. Said maintenance shall include resaining the wall as necessary to match the color of the surrounding bluff areas and adding shotcrete material if original shotcrete erodes to expose the underlying precast concrete panels. At the time that additional staining and/or additional shotcrete is required for your seawall, staff will request that a color and a method of application be utilized whereby a color that is compatible with the surrounding bluffs is achieved. Dlf: 96 -008 (2123/96) I'll 619- 6,i4.26(s) / FAX 00403 -2627 IAA S. Vulemi A%MIC. F.nl iniUS. C- difurnr.i')_o 1 1.3 3 11)D 619.601 -271X1 1 rnryc4d papa .- You should contact Lee MacEachem of the Coastal Commission at (619) 521 -8036 regarding Coastal Commission final inspection. If you have any questions in this matter please do not hesitate to contact me at (619) 633 -2714. Sincerely, Diane S. Langager Associate Planner cc: Todd Baumbach, Engineering Inspector Lee MacEachern, California Coastal Commission Bill Weedman, City Planner Dlf: 96 -008 (2/23/96) r. s ' Vrans.frm r TRANSMITTAL SHEET Soil Engineering Construction, Inc. 619 So. Vulcan Drive, Suite 210, Encinitas, California 92024 (619) 944 -0124, Fax (619) 634 -2401 To: City of Encinitas - Engineering Dept. Date: (kaber 26, 1994 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California Our Job No. 94 -008 Attention: Mr. Hans Jensen Subject: Clayton Seawall 638 Neptune Ave.- Proposed Plan for Aesthetic Shotcrete on Lower Wall (Elev. t 7 to t 11' MSL) We are sending you via: Hand Delivery the following Plan & Section This is for Your Review and Approval No. of copies submitted: 2 Copies to: Mr. Todd Baumbach Soil Engineering Construction By John Niven Please review the proposed aesthetic shotcrete placement plan and section for the lower wall ( El. t 7' to t 11' MSL), which is attached to this transmittal. If you have questions please call me at 944 -4124. cp 9 y 1` OCT 26 1994 ' ENCITY O OF F ENuNiTAS a t t a O CL47-ro-✓ � Lij At�- OE[Ev1 11 5 hof[refP v %C4-�-e / "= S , ,^ I ltlRgSS 31". 03 MO NVY fA.t 2r ID G UWUJuAOxrol all, 3m'g59 �35V }3A3s13]Ilm me- MW.P mms%l RM105S� 13A3K3 svl lK 3lryf , .N} 1511JHSp BCf! irylg55 H3llIJ'S13]KD% iW Cl W, :INPj-lr 70, z ° ;;XY O1N/ ri Q iFff .7,'r *// 1 F# m oY2co115- SA3 p 9Q'r goy oS vaa��wbNrsnP 39Pa d� 7'40 % 133HS- 410 +r 1919?/W N 5 /I 7pirvlyl lyo/! F# _/ 3114 -- - -- – - _ .1.1.1 q. a3a N... Z =.r / v 7 7f April 29, 1994 Engineering Department City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Attention: Hans Jensen Dear Mr. Jensen: SOIL encm ainc conspurion. ROD Plan of Action for Repair North E1 Portal Street Encinitas California In accordance with your request Soil Engineering Construction (SEC) has prepared a plan of action for remedial repair at North E1 Portal Street, adjacent to the Millis property. We have prepared an outline of the proposed repairs and is attached to this letter. This plan is based upon the conditions observed at the site. SEC plans to make every effort to remediate portions of the existing pavement and landscape. Upon receiving your approval, SEC will begin work. If you should have any questions or require any additional information regarding this Plan, please call the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION n W. Niven tractor's License No. 268082 0� ,v V-, 619 South Vulcan Avenue, Suite 210 • Encinitas, CA 92024 • )619) 944 -4124 • FAX )619) 634 -2401 General Engineering Contractor license A- 268082 HIGH TREE i � 4 a R F a 0 a a w x H a z z .' BLUFF EDGE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB (BURIED UNDER SAND /SOIL) NOTES 1.) PREPARE TOP OF BLUFF AND PLANT GROUNDCOVER AND SHRUBS (3). (AS SHOWN ON DRAWING) 2.) REMOVE ALL BROKEN AREAS OF PAVEMENT AND 9' SAWCUT TO UNIFORM SHAPE. 3.) REPLACE PAVEMENT TO EXISTING THICKNESS �-' AT AREAS OF BROKEN PAVEMENT AND /OR AS '. FAR AS TO WITHIN 1' OF FENCE LINE. EXISTING BRICK PATIO 4.) FOLLOWING ALL PATCHING, APPLICATION OF TOP COAT WITH SEALER. 5.) INSTALLATION OF 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE. (AS SHOWN ON DRAWING) MILLIS RESIDENCE DRIVE WAY EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER NEPTUNE AVENUE KEY fNTSI PROPOSED 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE 11t11 'POP OF BLUFF REPAIR AREA EXISITNG GRASSY AREA EXISITNG SAND /SOIL COVER x EXISTING ESTABLISHED GROWTH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1 505 S. VULCAN AVE. EAICINITAS, CA 92024 TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PARCEL NO. : 256- 051 -1000 JOB SITE ADDRESS: 638 NEPTUNE AVE APPLICANT NAME : CLAYTON (CHARLES L.) ADDRESS: 12785. AMARANTH ST. 92129 CONTRACTOR : LICENSE NO.: INSURANCE CO POLICY NO. : ENGINEEP, PERMIT ISSUE PERMIT EXP. SOIL ENGINEERING 268082 eAN:' NAE: LONDON CB34610 CIVIL ENGI.NE —rRING DATE: 4/22/94 DATE: 10/01/94 CONSTRUCTION INC. COS. CONSULTANTS PE_MIT ISSUED -------- - - - - -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS L" n+ PERMIT NO.: 38357 PLAN NO.: PHONE NO.: 619 - 484 -021 PHONE NO.: 310 -831 -029 LICENSE TYPE: A POLICY DATA': 1 /01/94 4�4�, N 9- 944-4125 BY 1. ArPIICATION FEE 120.u0 Security Deposit is Damage Deposit assign 2 INSPECTION DEPOSIT: .00 to 3460TE. 3. ADDL. INSPECTION . Ou 4. SECURITY DEPOSIT' .00 Change #1: E1 Portal St NU to�bePcompletely restored, City fence to be replacec USE OF EL PORTAL ST NOR'T'H WEST OF NEPTUNE AV AS STAGING AREA PER ACCESS PLAN, BARRIER PLi�Iv & EuUIPIK.�NT LIST RECEIVED 12 -8 -93. USE OF THIS SITE FOR ANY OT?+ - "It JOB MUST BE LR;_ApPROVED IN "WPITING BY CITY ENGIN -Erp Change #2: No contact of the bluff shall be allowed. - --- INSPECTION ------ - - - - -- m -- -- DATE -- - - -- -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE [Todd Baubach] - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION ------------------------------------- I UNDERSTAND THAT Th CITY OF ENCINITAS UTILI7ES A COST RECOVERY SYSTEM FOR PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION, AND THAT IF KvOJZCT COSTS EXCEED DEROSITS m APPLICANT SHALL PAY TPE OUTSTANDING BALANCE PRIOR TO RELE ' ASE OF SECURITY. I HAVE CAREF'U'LLY EXAMINED - COM- PLETED PERMIT A-ND DO nE�SY CERTIFY TJNDER PENAZ,�'f1OF PERJURY THAT .'ILL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. S Bob I i ►-r�xy P „INT N"U"t CIRCLE !� - .Zz -su DATE -sIGNED TELEPHONE NUMBER April 29, 1994 Engineering Department City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Attention: Mr. Hans Jensen Redesign of Shotcrete Seawall Clayton Shotcrete Seawall Permit No. 3460 -G Encinitas. California Dear Mr. Jensen: As considered necessary redesign of wall components was performed. Attached to this letter are the original design calculations, and the latest revision according to our model used. Please note on original plans and drawings. The aesthetic, appearance of the seawall is as originally designed. Reinforcement was changed as required by our calculations. If you should have any questions or require additional information regarding this plans and calculations, please call the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSLUTANS. Charles J. Randle, PE No. Giu% 6¢. Die 9W.7 page 1 of 4 By: Martha Gonzalez CLAYTON SHOTCRETE WALL DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS: a) f'c = 3000 PSI b) REINFORCEMENT STEEL FOR WALL, STIRRUPS AND GRADE BEAMS: fy = 60 KSI C) SOIL PARAMETERS: Rock Friction = 40 psi d) PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION: Assumed triangular from top of wall to the upper tieback, from the upper tieback to the bottom of the wall the pressure distribution is rectangular. e) DYWIDAG GRADE 150 (tie back) f) 8" diameter tieback shaft g) 3" minimum steel cover, whenever in ground contact h) For steel plates use 36 KSI steel NOTE: Assume H =13' (after changingtieback elevations as we agreed the wall height is 81, but I used H =13' for a more conservative pressure value). SOIL PRESSURE Pa = 0.5(13')'(90)= 7605 # /13' = 585 PLF TIC$Y.J= I.CAp7 40� _ ToW EL roYl.c� I rJ �� X10 �- � QPOFESSlp4 n5 ' -)%s I �Qk�q�g JOH,y� i E L +10.0 s N0. C22096 EVu Dale M7 sAgT CIIL �V1 0... _ f Of C ALA ' Ceu fL 'b,s pl�Er�t.1a=E b15f,nIBUiIaFJ oN' 414 L1. LIT$ t L l0 C rw)) } 6+ s . fi4o) 1 �# = 'T E5 F3.BY- 0 page 2 of 4 TOP SEGMENT ELEV +37.00' TO ELEV +29.00' Assumed cantilever Mu = 1.7 (585 PLF)(7')' /2 = 24.37'K/' Assume: 0 = 0.90 b = 12" (1' strip of wall) Wall thickness 12" d = 12" -Db /2 -cover = = 12 "- 0.635/2 -3" = 8.69" 8 = 0.85 pb = (0.858f'c /fy)[87000 /87000 +fy] = 0.0214 pb = ( (0.85(0.85)(3)) /60)[87000/87000 +60000] = 0.0214 pmax = 0.75pb = 0.016 pmin = 200 /fy = 200/60000 = 0.0033 Mn = Mu /t = 24.37'K(12)/.9 = 324.93 11K a = Asfy /0.85f'cb = As(60)/0.85(3)(12) = 1.96As Mn = Asfy[d -a /2] = As(60)[8.69- 1.96As/2) = As'58.8- As521.4 +324.93 = 0 (solving the quadratic eq.) As req = 0.674 in' #5 @ 5" As = 0.737 in' p = 0.737 in'/12(8.69) = 0.0071 pmin<0.0071<pmax As min horizontal = 0.002bh = 0.002(12)(12) = 0.288 in' SUMMARY: Horizontal steel #5 @ 12" o.c. Vertical steel #5 @ 5" o.c. MIDDLE SECTION ELEV +29.00' TO +10.00' 1 = 19' d = 10.68" 14" wall thickness H = 35' Pa = 12H = 12(35) = 420 PSF (11) = 420 PLF Mu = 1.7(420plf)(19')'/8 = 32.22'K(12) = 386.63 11K pmax = 0.016 pmin = 0.0033 Mn = Mu /0 = 386.63 "K /.9 = 429.6 "K a = Asfy /0.85f'cb = As(60)/0.85(3)(12) = 1.96As Mn = Asfy[d -a /2] = As(60)[10.68- 1.96As/2] = As'58.8- As640.8+429.6 = 0 Asreq = 0.718 in' #5 @ 5" As = 0.737 in'> 0.718 in' p = 0.737 in' /12(10.68) = 0.0058 pmin <0.0058 <pmax As min horizontal = 0.002bh = 0.002(12)(14) = 0.336 in' SUMMARY: 14" wall thickness Vertical steel #5 @ 5" o.c Horizontal #5 @ 10" o.c. NOTE: for the bottom portion wall from ELEV +10.00' TO -6.00' the same design as for the middle portion of the wall will work since the pressure is the same, but 3' shorter. page 3 of 4 GRADE BEAM DESIGN #4 stirrups As = 0.20in3 Av = 2As = 0.40in2 b = 18" (min req. to accomplish 2 1/2" bar spacing) d = 22" Load to Upper Tieback LUpper = 81[585psf(13') +420psf(4.5')] = 75.96K Load to Lower Tieback LLower = 81[420psf(23.5')] = 78.96K w = LLower /8' = 78.96K/81= 9.87K/' wu = 1.7(9.87K1f) = 16.79 Klf Mu = 16.79 Klf(81)'/8 = 134.3'K Vu = 16.79K1f(81/2) = 67.16K VC = 2df'c *d *b = 2d3000psi(18 ")(2211) = 43.38K<Vu B = 0.85 pb = (0.85Bf'c /fy)[87000 /87000 +fy] = 0.021 pmax = 0.75pb = 0.016 pmin = 200 /fy = 0.0033 F = bd2 /12000 = 18(22)1/12000 = 0.726 Kn = 134.3'K/0.726 = 184.98 p = 0.0039 (interpolating) As = bdp = (18)(22)(0.0039) = 1.54 in' USE 5 - #5 As = 1.54 in' = 1.54 in' pmin <0.0039 <pmax 4�Vc = 0.85(43.37K) = 36.86K CVs = Vu -tVc = 72.82K- 36.86K = 35.96K §Vs = Av(fy)d /s = 35.96K 35.96K = (0.4)(60)(22)/s s = 12.5" s max = d/2 = 1111<12.5 :. use s = 10" SUMMARY: Use 5 - #5 rebar (spacing between rebars is 2 1/211) #4 stirrups @ 10" o.c. TIEBACK DESIGN Embedment length Load to Upper Tieback LUpper = 8'[585psf(131) +420psf(4.5')] = 75.96K TEST LOAD= 1.5(LUpper) = 1.5(75.96K)= 114.OK Load to Lower Tieback LLower = 81[420psf(23.5')] = 78.96K TEST LOAD = 1.5(LLower) = 1.5(78.96K) = 118.5K UPPER TIEBACK L = 75.96K/$n4�(12 " /') = 75.96K/8 "v(40PSI)(12" /1) = 6.3' LOWER TIEBACK L = 78.96K/0v0 (12 " /') = 78.96K/8 "n(40PSI)(12 " /') = 6.6' As req = 78.96K(1.5)/0.8(150ksi) = 0.987 inz use 1 1/4" DYWIDAG As = 1.23in' page 4 of 4 BEARING PLATE DESIGN Pu = 1.7(LLower) = 1.7(78.96K) = 134.23K a 7 1lx7"xl 3/4" for plate dimensions B = 711 b = 1 1/4" (rod diameter) n = (B- 0.8b) _ (7"- 0.8(1.2511)) = 3" tp = n(J(fp /0.25Fy)) = 3 "(�(1.6l(ksi) /0.25(36ksi)) = 1.2711<1.75" A2 = 18"x18" = 324 in' Al = P /0.7f'c = 78.96K/.7(3) = 37.6 in' plate A = 49 in' fp = P /(A) = 78.96K/(49in') = 1.61KSI Fp = 0.35f'cdA2 /A1 = 0.35(3)(2.57) = 2.7KSI >1.61KSI ok tp = n(d(fp /0.25Fy)) = 3 "(V(1.6l(ksi) /0.25(36ksi)) = 1.27 " <1.75" Punching shear at tieback qu = Pu /A = 1.7(78.96K)/(1811)' = 0.414 KSI Vu = qu(area to be sheared) = 0.414 KSI((1811 -7 11)/2)(1811) = 40.98 K bo = 4(711) = 2811 §Vc = 4d3000(bo)(d)(.85) = 4(54.77)(2811)(22 ")(.85) = 114.7 K >40.98 K ...GL-AYTOa - SuorceETL Whu. Ii IL S►tr 1 E Oo 85 A+(5o ,jG Sa'JO SMiJi rou tAt,o.J oPcF - -- AT CAWTOL UOL Woks. 12x[oS -° JbOA F _- - -_ ---- M pa; A--- �_2►.- 5_�S_.8 -ZS .7 �" -- - - 6 - - .d_i�L — M„ -- 31.8 -- --v :300 _ A 6 G NEC - D = 14„ — AS •- -OQ% J2m b_ '7 0 - -- — t19.7 4-21.5 -13,7 - -- - -- - -- -- - -- ' 11 e_ M � +Q.o a53 o(_= 2% o - -- - -' - — +1>?.7 rJS+ob- - slot - 6.8 f 20.1 Eon 8- 4sPac-i N c eo �� >r GLAYTO1J y+T Z E 0085 - — 1V -- _ �_�LF�S_— _(�eSls� Boo PSFi I - 8 I g ter . 17 = 21.`h V4 rig , C-1 .,r /j0 - • - U z 1.l sX 2 1 -y V e lax 22L 43 y-'` � Try M s` In —��d i '79 G, S,. •Oo4ox18X2Z =1, TIC�AGK P EAR IG T� /�� ' N L- !-.,24 O x R 179c� Slav I�Q-- •]w,85X3x2 17 * y9 Z.dStK i _ � �_ 54f 3 E OOE r- ePAGtTY 'A To 1G 51tEk¢.tD 'I- x �8+ 181 (A 4- 2 x18x 12 ' 416 + 432 - $48,►J` _ CoNc.CAPkCir mono 848 - 1858""N,85' 157yr- •! sr�RQJP _ 4x .2x60 -_ 48.0 -- - -- - -- - 201,1'` >17:9O,I 4 CoNG. CAS !L x 12 +10 kZ +�6�10 21104- �3L N - > . Ir: t - i� City of Encinitas May 4, 1994 Soil Engineering Construction 619 S. Vulcan, Suite 210 Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Seawall Construction Q 658 Neptune Permit 3460 -G John Niven, The enclosed comments from the Community Services Department are forwarded for your information and inclusion as requirements of the Beach Encroachment Permit. Two of the most significant restrictions in this document will have an impact on your planning and scheduling of this project. First is the restriction mentioned in paragraph 2.c., which states that "Concrete trucks shall not be permitted on public beaches..." Secondly is the completion date required is May 27, 1993 and not Memorial Day itself but also the weekend prior. All of the concerns need to be addressed in your revised schedule of work. No work shall commence prior to resolution of all issues. Please call me if you have any questions at 633 -2778. Sincerel Greg S fields, P.E. Sr. evil Engineer Field Operations Enclosure - Memo dated May 4, 1994 CC: City Engineer Inspector Superintendent of Parks and Beaches File 505 S, %ulcan A%enue. Encinitas. California `)202-1 -4633 TEL 619 -633 -2670 , FAX 619- 633 -2627 ZDD 619 - 633 -2700 � recycled paper CITY OF ENCINITAS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Shields, Senior Civil Senior VIA:, :�7 David Wigginton, Community Services Director FROM: _015_< Jesse Tench, Park and Beach Superintendent DATE: May 4, 1994 SUBJECT: Beach Encroachment Permit for Bluff Seawall Construction at 638 Neptune Avenue The below information is submitted to the Engineering Department for inclusion into the conditions for the subject Beach Encroachment Permit. Please review the conditions to ensure compliance with Coastal Permits and City policies. After reviewing the attached documents and plans submitted by the Soil Engineering Construction for the Encinitas Beach Encroachment Permit, the following issues are presented: 1. The Contractor's construction schedule does not seem adequate to complete the project before the Memorial Day weekend, by May 27, 1994. For public safety, no work may be performed after this date. 2. The Contract shall fully comply with all Community Services Department Standard and Special Conditions for Permit No. 3460 TE, with the following clarified: a. Item 3: Lifeguard supervisors will be inspecting the work to ensure public safety is maintained and the beach is free of construction debris. The inspecting and monitoring of work will be deducted from this account. b. Item 4: The work schedule was received May 2, 1994 rather than as conditions indicated on April 21, 1994. The work schedule did not include types of vehicles or the number of trips to be used, which shall be provided prior to City approval. The work schedule showed completion after the Memorial Day weekend, which is not acceptable. Work must be completed no later than May 27, 1994. C. Item 6: The first notification was given May 5, 1994 for work on May 6, 1994, which does not comply with conditions. A one- time waiver is given if the City provides approval for start of construction. All future notices shall be 48 hours in advance and shall include: date (s), time equipment types, number of trips and duration of work. A single notification shall not include more than one week of work at any given time. Concrete trucks shall not be permitted on public beaches, since above bluff access is available for concrete delivery to construction site. d. Item 7: Staging or storage of equipment is not permitted on any public land or facility. e. Item 11: The lifeguard supervisors may issue "Stop Work" notices if all conditions are not met. These notices will void any permits issued and the Sheriff's Department will be notified if work continues. f. Item 12: The barrier plan submitted is modified to include the following changes: a. Staging at the Northwest corner of the beach is not permitted per Condition #7. b. The trench plate placement is relocated to a ramp to be constructed by the Contractor per red -line changes to the submitted drawing. Lifeguard supervisor to field site the ramp location. C. Lifeguard tower may require relocation after construction is complete. If this is necessary, the Contractor shall be responsible for reimbursement of all costs incurred by the City for the relocation. g. Item 23: Minimum sand replenishment expected with this operation is 75 -100 tons (3 -4 25 -ton trucks) . Only type of sand approved for replenishment is California Silica Products (50W). This City requirement does not waiver the Coastal Commission sand replenishment condition. cc: Alan Archbald, Engineering Department Director Tom Buckner, Lifeguard Supervisor File /Originator B:ENCROACH.01 CLAYTON jE TRENCH PLATE AS NECESSARY M,RM N — I SEE NOTES FOR Pxv Ran _ INACTI AREA lr To I ew AN SOURS ow°rtO 1cp°�".:° I I_ AREA II_ ••Ili FF _, a a � [ar yNlenr 1 iw1g11 o[tu w rR••v aPo At (rm.0 Nmp �Ln L4c-k ON, too, sp'llow �,p� EDIAPYENF STAGNC AREA ABLNDC D CULVERT AS NEEDED LEGEND- % "W BARRICADE FENCING CREEK COTTONWOOD ULVERT y �1 � M l.tl'MLI TtmL. � PAIN FOR BEACH ACCESS Y i $ PATI1 OF TO BE COMES) OFF M.ITA qM CAUTION CONSFRUCIION SIGN 1 I PROPOSED HAUL ROUTE Mllh ei AEEA MIND Forimi lsluv M.. �Ob.IMMm qMr Lxlx41[[ YMpy . S1. AT • !TH STREET Iu Mill m t W 3RD STREET C [v[LS .k � 161, 1 'sW py I.1 INNI II Willi Idl1 Loll MI�IMUWi'IUi11 am cost lW OF E, O 1�mmi, A MM 'IN TOW A�IJJSIOF �IY[i TIME. tl "IN 10 M�I�AIMOII10I1Il{l d Ep1l III MI[IRL 1O TM CiAlit"[11 SIIt, 2ND STREET I41WIdPIp 010ki.IWIII Ip MPMEM A PROPOSED Mul IWII l0 Ixl lllr 1.) [ONtt NN sim trim to It cut to A MIMINN MITI so AS to Plp C (W ITOESli (W or 101L1111MSo As IQ R0Um I0 w (.I m'iP t11A -1 K I Mlgo so AS 10 ".'I NR SAFE AW Si il O LLI( fIxRWIWIM4 qux M1.1 AND la rllarlW 1 Sul IMI sIM11 M I11. f.l 11(M[M NATI 10 IT LAID MIOSS IM "IYM q CUT V,,MM IM to NO 15T6TilEET lRl[MOIK q51 AS I1((ISSMY 10 Plarlq STMIL put MAIIMM. [.) vNim "I IN OTC 111 PNII Fill[ N (MMO WE MSIROIIM INS Ip u[ I fIYl IIp114 LOU NM MWIM ISRAEL IMWp TS lAI O W I C 1.1 MO 11154 REACH (NM0 11[K it AS EC OR pWS MASS 1IIITII 10 RE QFdair°L«'ay `iii[igiil�i�un {iQoRxl1aiul' ilAui� MIA VILt d t.l Fill [pliMiY�1111t'gplY'GdgNA(RN I((Isie I1xR Aro/1m Ep1M1 x pl Ali INMr WIMMI. q Epi11U{ilp Ix113Iut MDib \.I EptxM11• "It MOrlq, WNW AlAIIMNE AT ALl IIMS M Me I leMlt fe 11 Ilpf p IMIRIIMIMe M LM TIN MU p SIM (YIXIS M"Mic.. Iq IIMM IM II1 M(A d FIX FullyP[AI0 LM Il RE SIMI[ISIto, 10.1 MMKV[1IIf w g1p�01111p 1q'Imxll Wl IfEI�EN1e CIS Ili EXOYIY[IXlmyelRll I1.) Mr AM; or' SltMe( RILUAIIK A REM gMSM-S AFMS RIMYIe p plmgy Wr E0Y11My1p Mill M Al Slp10 M M."Ato AI IXE FACE OF IW SSA1mi mi II -) ,,AN OR pal lI cumouASI, f'A or 11% orvior IM 1 µIjrn A 11 IrglpMID (u4 ❑II El(M by IM cpgNlp. W Esr To leo4sr VF-U) SOOT4 To ViEVJ IFi LE bQ:N kopoSiz-9 W All. Cn10 QT}i P64F- I AIoUN To Sour- VIEW SCUT* ro Alo'rf V C-ul -RAT—L-2— TRANSMITTAL SHEET Soil Engineering Construction, Inc. 619 So. Vulcan Drive. Suite 210, Encinitas. California 92024 (619) 944 -4124 fax (619) To: C/ OF &VC�.1 17-4.S EV4 f� j6 €,r"Jq DEPT. 505 S. Va c4.JAJF-- &Jb,u is/ r!4 9202,¢ Date: 3/14/5s Your Order No. N.U, P 93.05 Our Job No. 94. -608 Attention: M?-, 44th A o c N i 6-gLp/ {% E Subject: F�oQOS€p SOLD(Ek- Bit.. WALLS - Cc 4� TaJ krr S. 62(6M jkr We are sending you via: the following This is for t'O%JQ 5 At—T'L0%J4L These are No. of copies submitted: %3 ) Copies to: /VZ.�,1i^1149AJA)E.Dy Ft_4,.1i1I.J6 I�E % Soil Engineering Construction By John Niven A7-r4cNED T iCLVD E 7116 ,CC- LLCW1^j6 ( ¢5e 7,$) 0 FRO wt C,T ZA -J+MF— (MA Q.. (4 11ct95) C C014ST2Uc..rto -1 'PiLocades S 0 x- s A- A E $- B PL4rO; I Z (, P.uoTC` s O ST2�CTJ i?llL C�}l.C�uLA -TICS 0 / �^� �l �2o�osEy �CJ�T�o�i S OF:--. . � MAR 14 1995 ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS C. J. Randle, P.E., President 619 Sa Vulcan Avenue, Suite 207 Encinitas, California 92024 Phone. (619) 944.4115 Fax: (619) 634 -2401 March 14, 1995 Department of Engineering City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Attention: Mr. Alan Archibald, P.E. Subject: Proposed Soldier Pile Retaining Structures As per our telephone conversation, this correspondence has been prepared to confirm that I have reviewed the soldier pile retaining structure including the structural calculations. Based on my review, the proposed soldier pile walls are adequate in design and, if constructed in a timely manner, the walls will substantially reduce the potential for further retreat of the slope areas above the completed seawall. It is recommended that the urgency of this proposal be recognized and that the propose retaining structures receive City approval as soon as possible so that further retreat of the mid -slope area can be stopped. If you have any questions after reviewing this letter, please call me at (619) 471 -6000. Very truly yours, CIVIL ENG EERING/XE C es J Ran le P. . RCE 22096 President s No. C22096 "' Exp• Gate 9/3497 s�9r CIVIC ��\P F�F C ALIF� N.C. E.E. #4170 • CA R.C.E. #C -22096 • AZ R.C.E. #11971 • NV R.C.E. #3037 WA C.E. #10776 CIVIL, STRUCTURAL, AND SOILS ENGINEERING • GEOLOGY -SURVEY • CERTIFIED INSPECTION -SOIL AND MATERIAL TESTING FEASIBILRY STUDIES • CONTRACT MANAGEMENT IL CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE AND SEQUENCE FOR INSTALLATION OF SOLDIER BEAMS AND LAGGING WALL AT 638 NEPTUNE AVE, CLAYTON RESIDENCE. 1st. SOLDIER BEAMS WILL BE EPDXY PAINTED 2nd. SOLDIER BEAMS WILL BE DRIVEN INTO THE BLUFF TO TOE DEPTH PER DRAWING (BEAMS MAY BE SPLICED IF INSTALLATION WARRANTS). BEAMS WILL BE DRIVEN FROM THE BEACH USING A ROUGH TERRAIN CRANE. 3rd. PRESSURE TREATED : "x WOOD LAGGING WILL BE PLACED BETWEEN SOLDIER BEAMS. FILTER FABRIC WILL BE PLACED BEHIND THE LAGGING TO STOP SAND MIGRATION. 4th. BACKFILL WELL BE PLACED BEHIND THE WALL AND SLOPED INTO THE EXISTING VERTICAL BLUFF FACE. F,pox`+ pawf�f� 2LAc2�.Fi t,L W � iiot -Dl�t sr� FI�-rEtZ SA.\�^ ZI• I..JDD'I LA, F A a 2 c �iPrcirc L4Gc.nlC Dvrz1 -yc Al TU. SOIL Enema -alnc con3cnucaonm (A.. 11Z PPOJECT NAME CIL4 rpkl 5 619 Su. Villain N%cnnc N2111. Iliciniln,, (ulifu nue 1,1121 SOIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INC. 619 So. Vakan Avenue X210 ENiCINUAS, CALIFORNIA 92074 (619) 944.4124 SOLD16k f ILF_ RET1j1IJ1AJ15 S7;ZtK7-Li W f c x 37� 2Kt 6 Q —,?—T.A 6D, WOOD L- A(,(,,NG 'Leos (14V !r-Al k)ALL- (o3 /\IrtvTJAID SHEET OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY SCALE /O ,EEOSto^J C1c^JTTL S'r'�S CrJti2E �JS�C� W�tKa �/a2tES 'k2o'� -) fL.4(� \� w A - 4 AffX15 T /Ales S4CpE , X-opE- ,Ex i s 7-1,46, s 4-OPE. ;v _ /I �HjA SOIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INC. 619 So. Vaku Aveam N210 MNCEIMA& CAL MDRNU 92024 (619) 9444124 ,�LDiE2 �� 4E ,�ci •-b�v inJ6 STiZJ�L)Q W !O X 33 s £, 2: X 5 CFILrES502 -+E T2F-,4TE.D) Occo L4661'.46 , XJST.-�OPE 'r-L -JRI 'd SEA W4 LL 1J Se 41-,E /''_ /O SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY % DATE CHECKED BY v DATE 3lel�5 /Fd (' FA Qi r $4((HLL J.- EX�ST��/6 SLEP�c <M,gEDD,..JF.✓T F�o ( o SE D SC O OF Z PILE bl) 4 LL ( SOU T H 1 SOIL iencmeasincs rnncraur: inn January 27, 1995 Department of Engineering City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Attention: Greg Shields 7/e-/ - 7,v/s 0j5/H1_1 d ru �rroc�•c.ri H,9116 50771 efi /GK HA,vS AP�aoi/f+L P/Lc�. FILE Revised Concrete Mix Design Clayton Seawall 638 Neptune Avenue Temporary Encroachment Permit No. 3460 TE Encinitas, California Dear Mr. Shields: As per the request of Mr. Todd Baumbach (Engineering Dept.), a revised concrete mix design, No. 453500, has been obtained and is submitted for your approval. Note, this revised mix design is identical to the previously approved mix, No. 443501, but a super plasticizer has been added for on site adjustments of the concrete slump. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please do not hesitate contacting us. Very truly yours, S Jo n W. Niven Contractor's License No. 268082 c: Mr. Hans Jensen, City of Encinitas Engineering Mr. Todd Baumbach , City of Encinitas Engineering Inspection Mr. Charles Randle JAN 2 7 1995 ENGINEERING SERVICES C17Y OF ENCINITAS 619 South Vulcan Avenue, Suite 210 • Encinitas, CA 92024 • (6191944-4124 • FAX (6191 634 -2401 General Engineering Contractor License A- 2613082 PALOMAR TRANSIT MIX P.O. Ow 401179 E960rK d. CA 0204&1179 Main 0%0 (019) 777-3100. Fw Y (019) 737.2012 BUM ORW FU 0 (619) 480444M rp 11 ter. Date: 27- Jan -95 San Diego Revlon - Ready Mix Page 1 Time: 08:34 Mix Design Weights and Volumes CD /3: Mix Number: 453500 Schedule plant: 90 Design slump: 21'/5" 3500 PSI N 28 Days Material 1 Batch Percent Specific Absolute Quantity By Volume Gravity Volume ---------------------------------=------------------------------------ CEMENT SIEVE SIZE 705.00 1 3.15 3.59 3/8" CC 4 850.00 30.05 2.74 4.97 WCS 200 1971.00 69.95 2.73 11.57 Water (gal. lbs.) 47.40 394.84 1 0 6.33 Admixtures: 0 0 WCS 100 100 100 WRDA 19A 100 40.00 98 82 0.00 DARATARD 17 28.00 3 0.00 DAREX II AEA 1.50 0.00 Air 100 100 100 2.00 100 0.54 W /(C +F) Ratio 0.56 Aggregate CrAdir,gu Percent Passing 27.00 owe= offka fi wrld d0 : Oes6flede (619) 000 -8191 Z 30Yd SSE! 06Z 619 K01D3H 003:C NY9 'OD .LVw -Y0 09 :90 (ZEA) S6. 6Z FVf ■ 1 SIEVE SIZE 2 1/2 1 3/4 1/2 3/8 4 8 16 30 50 100 200 ----- --- --- -- - - -- 3/8i1 CG ---------------------------------------------------- 100 100.100 10Q 100 99 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 WCS 100 100 100 100 100 100 98 82 62 42 21 8 3 COMBINED 100 100 100 100 100 100 73 58 43 29 15 6 2 Aggregate Source: 3/8" CC PALA WCS PALA owe= offka fi wrld d0 : Oes6flede (619) 000 -8191 Z 30Yd SSE! 06Z 619 K01D3H 003:C NY9 'OD .LVw -Y0 09 :90 (ZEA) S6. 6Z FVf ■ CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROJECT NAME STREET LOCATION DATE: 26-941 GA;V "AJ SEALulq-t& PROJECT NUMBER: 638 Alec • R.O.W. NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: 56c PHONE: y2(,-94( P.PE Po ✓ /h ��N6 9. oo l NaNS, G , J s[s Awo Mii SG_LF rI- 714F CIA, A A0 KO(,,Q -?[inrn6- 41WA1. - Te)AIV H /vE�V � /j!g/dSL/!v- �n.vziatES f/1o� �'i �S• E. �. P1z Es�,l� Al. EL Pfzrr .60cc tEo. ,DER JW o /-PEV G04c AOi-- 16E /%1 T, /b -20 . P.�2,�5 �s �ir�b,enu� - •SttiuD o.c� /�laon�uG� (�E04GE/. �V5YD4j7 OG 1i7oh 01090 Jlgy ,(/{ 7d !� .ScbNER {rruSE /GrkCt_ bEH,,Ay CU*ze� s;cqEbl,(Lc <wD / k &fit ""'K ;29-4Ew H[e Ar kw, 17- Gvn m[,vBJ 7z) MEW- sY�N 7N9i azu- 61,1k f13 4 9xr&771j& G<1 v AcX65 -S McwNGll/ AIW( Z.,0 . TJro¢ 72-14U 1.-[CL AV--b 34.5E 66 lNacc ` 2EV[S�j 7a E7t162 1-W6RExiS,` 77116"653 Oa /hovE so /s 6 " f (VtnW4+acE 4&,q-NrZV .SE Ooj bi CALL 4PSG?J LuAcL fir 6Szz-zy 6/�MAj,5 ee27 6u6o ,&p6 j 7,1�4Eu AwfNa. 6977i,6W 17�mS D�SCuss� — SE� GiL E /--ox /l/ory5 2L;- 7J �FCO usr�eacfii,�/jl�r[ � �Di'xr� � /[5T .�J ,L'EG 17 �Lf/N l�JR KESTdllitlJh� /,�,o.Q,� �Z:: I L . �i) REC /e�/[SEp �Lstr� S (v HicLl i JE[E C [ltk 7o n f/f+n[s �n e Nis F%o2or�L SChCdc✓[: ih, curd Sr�/tT i4.W. 73�E11 A11� TD G[�E os __�l�d[nf" O� /'�mlh+�MPnf G'�Glin 4 CunSkLlLfJ on Gv/�•P2 fhG� /4LIrT� 1,7ES1,0oxE lgld�E r7-{ BW /Oa /M i -331wp (a -a -oo) CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 5,4 -941 PROJECT NAME: �'LAy7vN 6641 q"- PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: 6736 /0407Z19OE 4u5. R.O.W. 14UMBER: CONTRACTOR: SEC PHONE: �- �1 -9�1 CALLE7� -l"oHN AllvEZ) 4F 12 :Qm)P , 7L�o J�1m /JE &ULO At 5724,Q A-T 5"0 4,p, Dl)?oAZ�acJ f95 PC .QEi7�ST� .S•77GG U,v,¢E.Stx �E17 /SSUES. ,L 7tr.b lrii/+ G�E6 IS PI (ZI77Aub 7Z&-E7WX . - 6E77r�f t&HICN boltL BE F cct9�dB' %l� f�rs o�Grc� TNiS A5�00,0) . 5-/S -9y Coo.4K sL,yEOCrL� a,v0 A- I-LoSr of o /�t� foua /7'7aU5 /dF}vs NOW 6LrW FDR/h4r?GLc� 4y7i7/�{�/EYJ J-L;�N,y IV/VEAII 44Gt6j Awe scH®u �g ID s. >- moNOay. 5- 23 -9rf 5-23-9Y 70 cALt.m fhuo �&srre tFa s7�+r�7 Llv>t 7d 77ZES044 N /TP {/151799 517E 77L04ii. 77-..x, Frrc B u r L n „y U i? mP 2cus�c, Aow�1 &�F� oN Oar v.+TS /i goft'r, 7-,g4c DoE 7ROC9,60 OVER 7U 1klooNL1(o,c17 A! /Z 00 ;pyy e,u o.) - 4-7- Bm !/.0 Lo/W /N 4, CAU3Q7 J441AO 7D C� VpNE7}vd ,�&c5rE�CJ Jafso 76 2gx-r FLAT &X inoAwl✓ v& . 7-jpE 5ntC H1607 WA77LW 7b / MAn p&-oKyR9 Go /Nh d.) ,B.--,oq H. 77Z&rA_ ?Lo6 6EGir7� /GEZD RA R'P 9A7`2 7� / -3oam Lo,7L/-rEI7 foR 7>7/v AwrJ 6&751 ' ADD 15E Ls t �2s aN 7v.," 2F �uiF� 72E�N�t� 9U STDO �uo.Pr 7uoT7LE /SSUEV 72) 47- sr fEE d,,AR -4 orty 77 YZ/FS 7-b 7}s6 76rP .smitic�m, 6grvG Bo /c.T DN bGuFi/ 7DP 73 6+0U71"r (',d r- JoNu wAS ALSO �,ruE7J U"L Nt-r 6 -3-9cl 7-3 tg6PtfhCE �CiP6 o.J (=Z 31(0- 9y T -�FILG I-1oE bGCU,J - GyON7 Br✓U /N Co.uSr72crC�o�.� bOU?7e /ZFS S�31- 9u 527 -9t/ 0k(1,U&g Qfgtt fLuEs 7QrrC.0 was Tat <rtwr, moofu6trl Bt�C/I n'OL4y dfr3c'17 /D 3U SW /04/MS1 -301wp CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: -57-31- 9V PROJECT NAME: • CGf1 yTnN SEAAVALL PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: Cf-0e 61&2771vE AVE. R.O.W. NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: SEG PHONE: 5 -31- 9y 6ca,eN6R C'A» 6c f1E /2,5-�S A-,&- ZU,,q A/7- sE C 6,5,1 ruG ZH A2c. A&E)4C, / .5Lr AE.gK /UoURS. NE W /L/ IIVV,- T76r4-T -- y• /5ps,- J�tiN car mEsr,. r1� A-/& auAs �UGLrNC� EkCAVjFro�2 / qpM �tjgCH 1"526,0at 7br�� T 30 An7 C'i r cL ,lay,,,/ fhyO 70 Nor- To �o Tfi/Ra 66w-,61 lq7- /-�Om • 05-P Esy2ru 62 L.4i /Y/bley /�G L(oc/�S 70 AnC . �/E L� (UiY6rE ,T S cam✓ 77-/2 /2-4#77 /71 .c(E /7- ,L /e7 5/57!11 TD, o ,U�m �HFI�12E rH6 O.JJ5�5 NaT �JO(vrNV I�HN� UE //moo G✓t/uTE7J L 772 7U 54ri 7�Ll,'T— l,LyE i7/�i �rt� /p�s�vuAz 10o Qo AoT GG�/aT 7ht2� AXE ,/JUiit/ /o zLf� fi/,So P� rN�ar Ci64u7a.(J /.SAS C-a.ry 7v ;7?,F C/in . 9301fm - //7Er JE /� John -1 AT /V EL /�ORT%�L �yN -c/6 %iIEM 7He- LoCf4n0/V T% RE^,,�CE Ore p CAIN LINK FE.vCF. T[mAC5CKL. &t 19xJD 6A�E[- P4i4t6V UP- IT wf+s oECr19m 1-7-rAr-_5rC c,ULV /novE T-�vqcK KvE 7ka4 r-p�NL16oyr Br�4ct Ar- poop. /• /5pm — %fLrcic 9o&' rh00,LdSf4er- Gy,r7404'r 1,:3qoA36&)15 �- 3- 95/ ✓cS /rte �irRO Favrr+aA STc but alcEc2s Gv�zc .ke o At5 . (1214,26 572EF&c) 73L JoyN 7 BE S&AC 7a 6E7- L'N� wE /9p/�Rct/6b Qt 4iAx/5 . 14AI3 6",C A6� FH67 GuG1z4 T7-r/N /T /s Nola Ore p Plolt"L'b z�o7y Tz�/hp siXlr44*/ BW /04/MS1 -331wp (•1 -a -00) CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT f DATE: (n' &- 9V PROJECT NAME: 671-A(t7LVj PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: 6,38 /t/ a7VA16 4✓. R.O.W. NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: SEC PHONE: - 41- 9 Y / 2 : oo 1" - 330 Atin - REm, ao 6W f+aooT 5a,0,W m L5 ,4vo GET77u6 // Al6 QC. Ox/ /n/710� 7a P /s T6NU 12Ec E/VEV eon et4iN7- AT 212- LI/)/ sr. ABOUT "15g AT A9.4 zlok DEZ , " e -ral1W SrnD r0 AA6R60 / 6E7- 4 6444 72lmu1Ztczu. y Q e /vED — C�H /G R19 -AWALC NE l/6¢ 11676V 77�10r SEG /T�U/t7O A ST74l3GE m�TERiff� 76 fL6;7Ay6 . 77115 uj4S fJ ���/l//�eNE2� AST -Z EGEL. �%IR� i� A/LV �OF -�7T E��ilJ /N/ CL674Ni�K, 227- /7V 77,(X- Fz »TJNV 117t4`n .Qt. 6,C777N6. /-/f /70 le 9f t AT - G- k- xpus&FZ7 4u.16' am nor �2�A�c e � eox . /o ' LOO5A uNSr 3LE 064,&7-,5 br' aGUFi° GvE,ee REyna/ eW . LATE TLmbe /4XtJ 150 7NG /5 SGH63OUL&-P 7y dE 4c/6 IW07y A 2 j- r G 7G& /3[/G /GE7 4AD 076 2' 0FZ;0 / -/i 4 7WN6 OF -UCW, �-8-9z/ 12:JdAm- 33yAm. t3V /Z -3va.� 6/��A� -44, 4,y4,5 /novice FRom Al- 6-;1- PoerAL rD -,5W,4,66 y RRO • ALv v6 7 /tc- w , Tl-+E VOE s;7L-L ke /a 617- (*-) 6(e^,vA5lam "6,yr3 j e z& SET UP oN QLUr--' AIMEV Dorrw 76 41996k QEL.UU) / yS- PU/ry/J 7U R.vf?] b/✓ L :OO.di'1 - /i�Af � �/�E ,Q R,✓ J_ oc-� E 2T - EvwAavc 40r. �p6v- rn4 B,4R'wal //L b Z)/ 4( "o OV6E 4 26,4 .Z d ,0 Aul- 5E5 47,71 777W wA -/jLG 77,41E C (uAS A� oT /T6 _ Z- IZ)tO Ebw71xDE ;b -- 066,w w R,P k.4P l;4r/f %govt -Vvje o1cG DW /04/MSl -381wp �•i -a -ao) CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: ` -16 - 9y PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: A16p171.UE AU. R.O.W. NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: .s9E-c- PHONE: ( -/o -911 co,+- Z.,evA LQ75E 17?97bR 1AG 4VAS AlEIAZI i AZo " Di,G >7!E 5A6C pr' Gu177-1 ell6kEr 7D 7l 144 HoE . 77N10 C.,Me sUNEV ^Xx ,o 6 4,004NEZ/ our. %=w7ZA10 45RC,4y,4mJ Gu6RC O/J /4T 77�E ha,4 N0�TL1 ffvD Scrr77� Eue2S ek E 17— 771.e,US qp° T6flN G,a!& /Y>S d&7,5 oc 04AAt5 11117,11 /7r,NOF1 GflArrGCS � aOA/5 REV /Ew . /-/19-- iIF lAW pow &klol; .,cam 6,-19 OQ & -IV AN '5 . /.wars 71) Pane far?.& IAA.615 4�. 6-1�1-9z/ /0"'y AEso6,v RECEryE�o r9wD AA01QW6Z). 4G5o 6l4 ✓E 7}!E o•K 74) DRrVE C6h9EXr 7X?a4C5 a.N ABE?4CF/- 7Rr,,91- BfiS /S oNL4 • ^6r N+4✓pu& 7Tj/�r/u6l C.4,/} 46,"17Es 3%4Np�NG (v- /5 - 9�f 5 -• 0o sTm Ar2R�V�7 Ar mooauG,vr. T7r� sr7� �/IbN, CoUL.O NnT �q -CCESS �,QorECT• nzokm 6axwE- .4[-6- j3RdL /GF/7 73) /hooNLUd.47- 771 a5,c As 7DLUra& 7146 fp.4 GE7n5xrT 7 Qack . - AEGr9N OE 4 ,I-Tde606 OoEn�,us ,4 �,Ae j -1014m . 7: oo,�„•, - G,¢.¢DE -AU , pEl4 fr,�auaoN�o • SEC RE�✓� f} o�D F� G Or>ib6l� 7D �fZOG /OE QE7j�2 ,4ccE55. OEGuFtr�2.UG� DQFXJGruCo/ � • OF lv�� E�,vnauR7 UAr77C- e',a2Arr+ • riA67- S7e�& Pi9N EL pe AC677 8 r/5r9rri . PAMELS LERE 77EV �l,¢6lriar5tr� /✓ /O xrO S�at�s /u 7}rE //%.�D• .BE.eNfiQ/J COD.C,S6 /CS EJU6.� /lpp�7(/� �'$L. ,5�1CrU,�, ETC. �.�/rCttScy. /,usP�r�J 77J /nAt'E sU.¢E �i9NEZS f/ap /J/1_ga9L ,%,Ex4Aw ova Wkxr- Ctp1 /o" pct do/,%A a� �77NG �ur¢RD Trot- ay1-rmocovS aF /,qrx. e",J,-e47fi Bez� .mar• 4 7b7JIl- yos. 7 i7. 00 1314/04/MS1 -781wp �•i- •� -an) CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT raftealalowmtto DATE: & -Ao-w PROJECT NAME: G/LA7DJ S�%iGysiiL^^ PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION R.O.W. NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: .5cc PHONE: 6-16- 9�l 6,:Gd/f* - ffoDAt, - 77AnC .S225)u7- 04&4/) /,v6- 7Z11'° oG Fa�nab/ b/GG //✓6 rn,4 ��� i+-r /Uo/?rss /!x/o Sot�rli �ic(O,, /6/•/O SCmuG fa.Qi/(s • �Dg:eZ . V ' _* oL DI;F*iuS Ar AD' Q. C . C i7.JcB06 G✓AS /uo> 0A7-vVN L/v-40L BW /04/MS1 -7n1wN �•i- .i -nn� Wgr - gF&e 7W C0AJS4sYZWy LWe '/ Gna/p *Alp rt u/xP CIVAWAV aJ"' i i 4_ BW /04/MS1 -7n1wN �•i- .i -nn� Wgr - gF&e 7W C0AJS4sYZWy LWe '/ Gna/p *Alp rt u/xP CIVAWAV aJ"' CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 6-17-W PROJECT NAME: et- PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: &36 NFPlUN6 Av. R.O.W. NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: SEC PHONE: �/7 -9l1 (co,�r��pauRiN6 /5�/�. 7raoA�3`. /sr LaAZ7 AC&" eUog0K 12.*00am ! 6aV2,W& Gp,vG.Q 47- AloQ774 A vd 6u.n -1 E..va5 0.vt�r. 4r '5,4077 -le o �,9u� Cur BBL" Ct�},w,Ub 'TaP o` flYY7AXr PDU/lF� y&-r- C4.145 ",Voh /�!d �4TL //Vin -381wp (4 -4 -88) i7f6 NVlsE 6oi�b rti/Ro AID." iT. Bu Feud OF c ;wlle7- tusrLt EZE7/ l u tLL 6E A7- f! 77-QOt'6v46 ir: -72,V y 15 1Y7 o✓i.v& 7 eACLLIOE S 404;or 7; /E 6421641 72M)tGyr. (p -Lo- 9,/ ;rok ! G4tt60 7'ooArr- 44*IoA4V 6,,4s7- A-,16yr Bur /r t✓A3 /JiS�Qats. TlD� !t/EQE }/�Gu ayeR ii/6 av�o LuiTf! oou.L�nL� SuRF. CvBBcE E�vl�u��n Q�,t�i9,c iN Son,E G��ONS• fo4mS QUQiQ7 67C. LorS of {1;*w C'tE�xJ UP l ei4f NtWlQ7. 70 Con+OUAW /7Vfl/ER, rRge4 Llo6 _ 103r ewe OL /%S YizAGKs • _ A044V ,.S/1 -40 11ES Npr 6 Zz 9q �,4,eelc/,Dj4T.s,7£ ,#r (430,0x, FaonN!® tins v� ACA F C%pV7 -- rRzr 1- r !-� s sr7�ruoi < wRLt t-AS 2049 AA Ao,0 10 Al 3' NibN 77 -f&i, iwoar EeCr LA57 S' % 7z) lNE AIVer". j44,A) Sofp /5 /}�ovmlb ¢� rR"?Ge NoE s oh-- rte&- �+r/-1 ne?j , ! Z ev /Yl cgoesr�.�/• ,ear esm �zr 2) A44 -GoaSE OaW(5 /husT B6 0x44&2 U�/ BE�bhE �/ /tH ri� 7) E,vpS of DMus mu5�- 6& ri�s��l� rl-/,9 4 y&-r- C4.145 ",Voh Y /se7�p Sri M 6tCJi1.�+ ooi7ou4ia �� D;4 /04 /MS1 A6or>" -381wp (4 -4 -88) i7f6 NVlsE 6oi�b rti/Ro Ato�,ovbar ��+sH. Z ate /r �7 rn Assume y�r �o/sE ago 6E � fi rlN. 7% L'QiLlf- Awbi -rr 6U U ✓NCtC• 45 E Q�" C', r .arn c GA+M GN��J GCYEw OIL &,qc" Ov t Mp gSt> Al, G� � /N /N ✓iE sob,IlE 1 wwc.d c ru AW60 rigs /w ecfreu�6U, L 7+6a CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ►S91MaqA4�t PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: b- 22'941 PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: 19.10)"25 LaGM7oNS VOW�I �o,NT WAS Lo4JERED• &"2y -gq A y4;��6ED 77JO!±/. ZfcogE Of luoFZK was COAv7-,-1,u6V 7V 77-/e NOAwT &-o6. Ar-7�l2 o,o2,eox . 7 e Fn ,arn -C G GEw oU r- A*q- 9017V/Tn. TDB l�,4s SALVA66zJ Qv f 07A)6 R/P R� *W-O G'OBBGE ArF�Ar/(/ST Tti /E �,�75 AS 7�/Ey IA1EXE OQVO 9 0o�v7JNUdF1AJ& C�o,�ccq�PcASe.�ExT LoaCiv� i IQAZZ'tf , EY-1622N& 066646" L /ate �l�,v „4s r Ex /snN� u pus is ,snGC N/GHER TffshU ELF✓ O< GUNy>r G/A5 �DU�QJ 72%06t/ . 5 R19D/C75 CA-,u Bc 77// -5 SEtslon/ /,� i7/E Aje r P wAg 7.y lmeeovE apo�R,QA,ucE• �S>Xu4TL�t.t�9uv 5-r711- SouND .4L64KOi y6 m 6oz vA7<D Cup k • p�E7z NFh/zD oPUmp WEWA- ,e rEZC 10/!10 /L//t/Qu 777FIT ONCE 77449- Corne,5 aAV,,f T/.g85 , AF& Z- 7 V /N�.. T /DAL 4CnOA) �[1SNQJ .3 �' DL Co(jBC.� �qa/D �SEi3Wt� BE.z/ /uD &1,,0 LONGEx/rXAtfE 4r /VO,¢7?! EX/D. D/D RE) W45 7N6 �to,2�zovru� ,¢� /U�.@CEynEa/7” 7fi GJ4GIL/774T OQ66GC- Fz7r>o ✓srC SOGTNER,J /�y OF LfIALC f1g17 DF.t?C) ,Q56#R luj77euazy JL+41N 7a rHESE 6,,9-Rs 73wf1RD TiLfF Qu/Ar 7d E>usucE 6640 CoIiEQRC 4450 7171E VE,a 646 .57g/RS OE ZuE,aC- COVe72e2) /N CoNGR-ETE. NEED 12 'f AjlU • OVE,z-W CptJ6R4= �. OM %f1r �A DBA /// L�OLU/�NS . 7? 71/SCIQF p20pAE'Z OVE,Rt/v• QERNA2Q Gosr 3 CyLiUOEga uN /cN /�ci E,e6 l�iA3/J67' DUl 7a �E79 . %NE-� <3'/>riyOL�S !aE/4E nw /on /MS1 -3Olwp �•1- .1 -0�> Lo fn. CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 6'27 -9¢ PROJECT NAME: CLA y7Z>kJ cSErP w.vu, PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION:(w3Z Ntp7U.NE Aye R.O.W. NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: -56 C PHONE: 1.0 1<FA5ED ELEV OF wAGL 2 CAAZM6 LoE,¢E /ne✓E7) luo9k6 `igcf of OjaA AT °Cow 61-7- ° J/TE FRan LASr f�,ZW, . REeAA LaAS S77e&,UG W 007' OL /�07I1VL OvT S /OE e0,04 �s . l'H /c PEF CGNN /u(, Nfi1h . %L ooxezL /VEw .3,4,2 /M'D fvonNG. SEC._ D,Qic�ED Anp�eox • /3 "ry0 &�. ,STEEZZ b,yt y -5-6 40 40AUA) /N //OZ- E 6", 7z) PJ E X.UARD 600,& 45CzD 777E /G .Z Gusts Ga/., 7a .drop rI-�an. J- 13/-o I-/irh NO , 7AIA7.s L<,A%l C11-11c ",og -5 �ea DUr NExF. Exg�nS� 106X�:L oars/'ac- loa ns wat 8,r 77Lnhmal F2uSH bW/ Y M f OG fWIJ6,• A C•NULtyE CAy W/tt AF 1"57rtcZAV - %ON.y 1"0V7/6f4,9V 7,4E Z -�EBE &O/X)6, 7a J574-% 4VP94C 7Dwn co 6LUiY' 70 9EVUCtz7 G�LG XNIC16vU55 (L_ Qt WAJ • 1 7D1.0 //,m 77/47 CHAS A p&S/6 u cN��E T/rrpr 7UEEos M GO 7D iifM15. At--* of ,*& Z640 77c,Cp5� AivD 4 064- OF 6A,p. O.✓ 19?lXo 4*,u • )!Fe surf 7D�t /aNr f/ E .Sato • ZZ(/ /4L.�b �Ot fCAP OE.aiS /,d S774,EET I1+F/NTf7/4.0 ei OU/hoST 1-4'` 4ZLe�0 - 7Ztd ACrIB b r 7.Zv.,�i A-64"A'. 7l) 0, G9 /7(at OwA) Dc.�as rc i,�s7�• AtJ,V A- 7R6 67. tl &VA5 A107- ,orrz ~A) Z,6a.L6-o(,lr ,T>+ aG6�C ms's A7l� /nun✓• so(i7t/EFtN Z/3 OF l�pr� w4s Fo71m4� 7a RO /SE wACC 2 � FnRinS u.ERE o�cED W /rM�v /NLs/ES OF 4 bE710 S�"EEG /G39�EZ . 1 �o� wm 207- is APAI ✓ r*,g r Ale OD NOS 11,gvE 6;kW& 7 nwex4GE r,✓ G¢o,)T OG STEEL . 77,19 opZO 7, ,2onOVE 14, BW /04/MSl -331wp �•i -,i -ooh l CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: &- 2B -9c/ 1* /rt1/A.) l." oa LESs 7D . IGRmS ,47- 7}1(6 /N A //U.eey /9,v0 BEC,rat<SE OG r?L-f/S /T 4v ^s- Nam jDlzirr OEX PGA,N PG AN Sf'Oklks (,UAti- 6EiAY, Ccw7- /,STD l3Lt /fiG ingic IN 7.l 15 LD4A77o,0 • A[,SD/ fI /N //u 6o Lvpftz Sl�/NCv //cl� OGT 14 A0.0 sI,.RF w/TH A / G" 2 0105 6/"I& 4441114, DEAL T" A,14 -vE 14-Cno U IWA-s OUT /D CH/c kowOA41- . 6 /oc4G7 avr SEZTToy so T7rtfz, comic -a /.�srwc� p� p�an� 73rno/�GOly. ,SEGguSE oG iY1E ry,Aac, 11A,obES � THE �LA-N � � GE/7C/1 LUfl� Fjrtw/+,coEb 7a SECS c�f7cE Oar ,9-004-5 ObJ' ,UONLOrxPG //aNGE AYD ,Qt7/vt3Y�,�, 4 ,1 /SQ7 Rc, + ,zK o �.an�vx.geE o /Gt/ownoN �.r.� %ea&l 4b/14pE. SflEGVRoT� r¢.��n,o T7YAT SFJE !.�/soraa `P /Ae/(oM7A4). -Z' � /N7bv der /a H&-X- 771.v7` �L/►x� St/EwRS _��p,[o ✓ /.tY� wA� Nd' D!2 /p 6�f" f�A�B/.e0 5�.[..�LItZ /L1o�s 7b /h E, (2Y - ;7" f3ucA�-E2 f/,00 oBLFins Lu /ry G6'A C�� 7X4uc�5 seE2�v /hoeAU6,Vr 647%/ ,/cE4;6ZB1 CelAY46 O 7y ,/c✓l/J AN.d /LEAU S7Fb FLAumA.o AT Awelto& „rU=e,:S 17 o*46- AAIo EY /TS• /e-- /rF2,07;5V I� /AN6 L . s Go,ocEnvS 4 ,ff- Devr��� ,40/. LoT LOST A 2o' SEGr70sJ of 77de7/Z. �ANS 'r' (oRQ ,�L�.vF1& Of So•Ui7770N • �EZ- �- /ID'E?7 /j'/r/,,K/firc,7Y/�E.C� SD�CI%JG/Fj)Ofl ��dc ✓94I-) oro 77-46 S /�UL/i � I/DLA nOO SJ�1 _ Fv2 G✓/1 t� - "/�R�%760,U .�" JoN,o /nE,Lnou %d�y[s�tl P(�px/s A-nE Nr/- 10453-0-7-- /%p�Rox 2 3 " yd 3. PL/4c6a jdOAy , Sour]l�y z/3 a< 3W /04 /MSl -381wp Luq LL G /fi5 srF)01:7w jDwAto BcN�F Awi .gjeoRox. 2' DF C/a c t� !/�oic.fe� j wa-s A�OBJ• ✓� /Fib /`ilyr 17,� D/o Cur /vro /jcuFf ,aj�,�. st'! , ,Q,Q,¢A,ey„EynEJU7S sfivo / -a4..n „oG lr4s �'�u6 m/4gE ,�v,2 wauE Q�t�crar.* A-r ..S�u7NEZ� L 1J CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NWIWILTAWMcial PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: 7iELiia /3o9 REC v i cA C 7! To/y f ivlvE.y e&AI u ZIA) 4 ` CE 1-145 G-eFu 41574"9527 09r-Ab EZ Daz.-AC. LSE ssc.r . &&.w Ad D Blau P6 eta 7NE .r-i. r zoo DL AE -BR[KS 712il 4 6,96,e FRem VW 102O/JRey I Ul W crE77 iN /h u ,Q� SENG� . R.2RlV6D 4T SlTE i0 r &:00,9-m. SJ ` filoES 7l7 TiI E I� /oRlZculr�iL f3Fi4ri� 4-F i/0 ' e -cY. L44'16C6 4t?AV-- pcAtEO /77 7XIC 'Jo/e.,W -/o. FnRin EZE .E�JAe, c5 &r- FDR A 2' RZY• AV01774u , beAJ 4aaM CV17}V �o y rMAN 79677Ac& LA2A, 1, 75 - o z 7 AT 517E . %�N f+NO � 9LXEW7t2;P /o Aur6P OuT 'J$ Ab6E.e 0 . 2&- cEs r7lASr altVt � Nor it27EQG/ OR fi -'SIA16 . TNt7a i/X,6V !7- e4LeXlif /PS' /Ae toDltiY£y 73%5111 6U7 6,0,E 19- ,VetV6V ,47 L41A5 Co L16CR,kAW 7%,Ar 1Oa120A,'7 1G fbt n 14i, 5 &PV& e0a,*V 60�vkE 77E -Aor a,F >a qw (nom m&u Aav 7 -Dace cutil� T�/CXF 4095- 6WAF )x. 20' F;eOM A)OR7Y Ex/O 72) NEi►CfS7- /J! tC9GY.4A✓ 4KrX€ Cot&MV. ,6" 1n&,Trd6v CF{!C cvAS 66oub ro /,vcacp• f1 No7XEZ AQ )A) Lupo 9A*r,05 Air 6lO&*K • t/3 aa! • 2c�J 1PC�arz )0, ,Ap ¢/E- AW �E [uf/!GH 4V ILL -OW aF 409P4fX-!;- ✓� LEAS lN�7,eU� V 2r C1oy0L /,✓Ca5 fi2ou,uD E'%LLSEb sTFET� -1D 77 S: - Zy .BE Co/UG,CE7E C,*O _- N!1% Co E- /An Co,-ngcr (oln -1 - S7EFL- JCI,a.5T rXZ14L 6Za4N Wa4A4 ` Ar 9:4(0,4m. fi&995 6A7tHW AT 6:6191-A4 DS0 /Od /MS1- J£31wp (•1- �1 -DD) L'ou7� CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: NIi3�(11i 7tiy�[i),� ,e,- A.,u G.oto , DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: ov &�F L'o✓ clnvE / u 7w as &/, 2 h,es. /g oor (o. c zem 5 7La I-ooK fUUG CC 16i vD6r-S • 76Pi0. 7YA-T G0.4e /S ,uo &Coa , Nom` n COA)RNUE. CeuGz,576 (�p5 6-iof �2 /f,NO poC(t L/ . /J Cu ftL�t OL Fi��c� oL of 2ND T&.ues ".40. n wns 5&--�n- A4C-e.4-r 9:1.91. Pgool -Qn wRS }!/bH 6o.,7aw7- SAc ir„, (r,45 ,tar AZ40rr14, _� Rvo.� Fv2 E".�/zoe. f�i�Pc�Jr, �yoW /5 .i2fiNfd[ce��a4 /S ex,GY�SEL• ��LJ/ o n /M` /S Gu /nil /.0 %/6�C(lpN>� .BFJffyr c�E. sic• usm ,�r /cN P��� w,.�x �r� � R/o L'o,yc.tE7� �.N ST�z . l'/1E1�5 wE�tE A'LS� �(ovtZiN� l CY'T, I A115 AXlPf 15 'y /G,v i s-t 01-' Z TIE A!5*6t fxaly, Alo4774 XWO - C, 'cojcA,RL All L- 1/ F- 7D 8E 1,-9ct u°G - 717N1, f-PA ,5 VvD /zeo,4iG , A ",a 7N6 7LI319Y 40.0 CO./60M 173 uS7ZFV DUT • C/NlG ?D MO. l ra k . 6EW6WAC 0 LEA,0- uO (u02k- , 77E 57 L� /O FbR/n . N� (?,*AJCLeM SGY EWLZ7/ Me AG - 721OC 40V ZA40. /T AL eXW-60 �rrUG6� o� /T" 4W S 7D 96 GF%T i.J�Yiacp]. 6eE6 C�,*u.0 CHIC . 476MAJ& 6Z&,t40 Ar 7-•m -ALAA _ 2110,4loW /JbAkIA, V 0004- Ar /l• BW /04/MS1 -3s1wp (4 -4 -88) CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: _ l..rAS �d�2n,�27 �n,4 Ad AD0�77oNHC Z' CovExACoE l�N�cN L.�At.�L/J �cAS� LoGuEQ NoR.�Zcw779 L BE?31h Td�o Gi Alb (, ofFg. g1oNlmA&y /T 72, ExJ -'Wlr 77!1,5. WW,..i .QA'.2� ✓ElJ Sf -fdL� A�J�R . ACC.. 7l�Cic�s Lc�,c� E7��T7E"D (yy G /NtJERS . 77111 Cod L -. nyD ,6V 4,Nr7c 8 c� fin 7- ie- 95/ .7-ehW cAu-,5 v GA,ST N,� liAeT <SR4l�!/_�FSj b BE 77 -/ ,EFZE TdOAH AA/O ;781xy =7a�4E?r. /,d &Wggt9770,lJ /acr C.a6 .i 7- 00-9�! �/Rtf V (y uvai s� Grsr TsrE ,/o,B .4.vD /S REVi���G /4 /X 7- 1y -yc1 -40hw Cfa-4V- I-,71x D6SI &A �,,zw wor SLrorrCef 7N� 41,4,,774- Ob-21) 1*? Z7ha es- *M, 7 20 - 9Y Rfc D ma DESi6,u Fv e _ s cp- c� a7- �- 4/SaA . II.o-A4s _�pp2oNEll . `/2 SAc cfigp c; T AyD4p Ave sGUmm LDaEXEb m j ` ✓s /rm s /rF 42�0& r 1••o,2 a". 3 4y9O0AVZ5 nEiA46 sr ,ter. wANr n Sr.Or 77AoOo&) DW /04 /MS1-781wp (4 -4 -88 C,A c 041 c4u L-419 SLIC&S -fV 7a vU`1 • X'A,v NE $A- ",p O,C 'f/5o. CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: /2- Ills S7EEL A�R0CIQ9. So e 57E�Z A a-5 GuERE /.VGHES �¢orn %x1cE oG ESQ uFG AND &ex& Cogw 7 MQVIA//> 77-to" 4(17- //" f AAA P.mNI� A-096as //y. Ai.2R 0047/) 6-.o n� haws /,v ir, ,5a 771a5E dxew ip BE fgi-:�u2 F-7 e"cu Sut/5AcF . y1n eoy- Ch %cs "AQ A 7ECNN�C<A�% FaQom W yv+AN 7�St7Nc Q,QFSE,IIT • �, /Z � �/SA�n /V- (.ou/1Ttn GUN /TE ��if,J r ' /S}/OT CRETF P��JG /0%%7dit/ • Z�" iT IAI // ' L�0•X6 . ND2ZL6/bA -�1 -r�Fl� SLOWLc.�f�t/J/ C�C�iULLc. %b E7l/SU2E GYF`A/ A-C�UC- �T7cu% Tf•/ /G,et.�ss Lc��� GAO r� DoNi7NUAw, R�7n /NVE•z� � ,�f�sr�• 5 LoA:as osz s -- iNE 2Z ' ELE4A• -7v y 1, 45 9640 &V Ahs e&,fF vEz . InA/N CavCEp„Al UJA-S &ROUX6 4u47?t- R - 3 S6XkFe1frF _ G06o977o4S GuUERE Co rmlaAL- Douce Z --Alfa Awl JVEQ ZF29F.SLJ 6-61NG267g . 41 SOint G45155 �S,{ CA 7E- AgEcAmG ZZ9-AVl� TftRU Mo(.57vQt:- sR�1 /lAnoN fIND SL /D �dLv U GG/IL" EZA05jN(, QEpaq Q , 771[5 �APfJO�� 3 LocAr7oAb W177Y 77/ G�RGEST Su cE 1 E4 A/WLA-cV A&7N6 2'sr3'. 1-4.s7- LoAy 4, -45' S ai7- SEG AR &ILP 9 77E 134CK5 Rr 674E/, Z7 ' Srl9R77NC, jRDAi AlolwH 7a 5--wy. Z H of IiR /LL /uG RHO fig'• 7?lr, coo�ER 57YiND�u(. /S� � r,,o,una,c DE�1iNS. -Z 1NA7�f/E.0 2 QyW110A&S 1&5En76V /nrnb fJ "OHOIZ-S #VV LEA &6,40E DW /Oh /MSl -JIIlwp (•1 -1 -OII) CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: �:L�Il1l�I1Z' t • • t DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: 7_yy- Caul)77/)ES W �r7E 6&777NC, kL,6,H l407- 9�Ri �+i . QA�I 460%3 RdhAsN 6 47- 517E -71) 757- �6yT AlgicAl 1,5 7D _� � /N7d NOC�s .¢ BLUE Fri /LU,e� occuez�71 3 T�/cL /)gS ia7xlLd ;7-27 -9y 77E- 6✓6tc5 aR1ZLa2• 2 6-c /4X�c Gea T LEST. 7DDAc, .9wa T�mo c wr �.,e�n.4i w,cG r9G 1,,q/GS TD A—E %2o4T�IJ• /�`-Lr LVCMCF_S. ) a -z 9y 17145 1Y70,4N/N6 BE7dvE -EN / /;oOpr" - y:A)Arn 6 DG 7 77E,E- m Raw) Bf%CKS WEfZE 7 SiF%'. Tfl67/ /1ELD /50� jafi �SIi+iNUI�S. 10Z& LOCX� O� 1417- OBS /!vim GoAO. 77;y PC BAcx IAA A 1eg01 6' Ave /?iEy CoG/LONT `w4e . /T W /LL 6F 04045' ,4i' 9 OP7E . 8 -9- 9y No 96nLj:r /q/:Z L,yST ovEEK. SEVVR Z- SEC BE(rRN /t/oTGF111,06 ouT A eE 4 6UNERE 26W Ga,,ft� 49 , /S W> 36 LOC W 7 Al '27` ELE1/. f3LUi7'� 15 Lvov SR-ND ,N 77-ti5 Su THE GavE 4P R,Q20umo 10:30-tn . j`D/L 22!Rc rNctJ 7boK oli >, Z Co✓EV [,v. Ee' &[Ntrz iti14& Na.s RE come up w ,7r f .¢ Sd e. uTMN . 9y 8 [o an, JoNN N v F20 r? C/:05/J�VES>� NES9iD � 3� Guo v` 775/) Ay /NJ ELT/Nls Loa SE 66,UFL q-Agq L,NE%rc- G CAr?E 6E?9m 6o65 w ig/ 640.T- 019�uco .ia,y u - cr�CT 4 1,ma5A*C o,� 1ni4GYiNF n STDP. 15U6mr1T /04,9'� 6,014F 6A 72Aul N[, DW /04 /MS1 -381wP �•� -� -aa) CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: oler4 i IT*WQ.i3 L DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: 9V fo vT. REC �O CflLC Fizom /oF/N �4r l/' 'b.4� . NE ..S.4rD l.✓N.gr fi� Uo /5 ��D ,(�AC,GNG .5o D,4 ,4 C,�A� -ysr> )h 56fJ /UM .S /L/CA-r7, %N /S �gRD EIV s SRVO. y6leM,& %i4vX 776a -r 4�wA5 oa&-y_ /� 57ZIAEO i=uIZ a�16,e .�bs 4i rZ )04),erA C-,qs CFE2? 1 opg Carr, . 1 7N-,o 4'1o, ro .sro P. . rUr .5cvnc -�IAr& 6N rf ?I Q u bQ ,/u GU.el774,6, Atilt/ GEr C'Cri -f b✓G�ti�/LrsG Srr'+h� /gyi�i���iL BE�`a.�E Co.�.r�.��.� . �ir - 710 /�X -54W& /rA/6 Tb 11S /l 7fE /huUV f2t7`ies7��% fi 7P SrLP uNnc Tai o" -I/- � R /N /Ar6. P,-, 7orN 0/--- -5s* 60,4L-L, y /✓SiTtp 6-r7Z7 A% 0,f //- 00/9in. _3 f.�ofi/LE<zs (ofx/E CfP o�u ri/�OL•9N oG (ALL ZL A16 S1XNj- /CG1eH1 GE>Gr� ltlsE %F .41r FLEW 7, Zd ! . 64-u4C /S 61x s7?+BGE 14we Con r K� /) 6L..,d oN rN On. -3:30 Gm rC - 1011 u NrvEN j1�Cy42oru6 Q L- Sn�P t)2.t 04) /I10 u. A t , rSr�r lECsr /SF_ /iF AX. C(,,9triD u Nor //. kv rNO /FnDy;o . rc 1�5, 8 lc� yy srZ)P 100Re V0776e BECAC/SE OF 1I7R. C142XC 7Z)A/S l4uRE 7Z:) u,0,014r-E 8 -211- 9y To tlX� CAu EJ /✓IUL. BC u ola�Al& AmoA"w .5- 7aAom.o6 d,:001" - TYtdLZLG 66 / tJ5Ti5cLs vG 5-c4Fu4- r91.U6 8'ZS it/ SCRfD�O /NG ��t/SiY4LCEn %3)ORy, 8 -3/ -9y No Acn�ln, _ cAU.� � c� /n�s•,LE rbz _/oHN 2-2- 91' 2 L�&o.zEP� I-�EXE lAi,37RU W6 s» 6AI27s fo/G 110,4 znArrA6 666 -m. 9- 6,- _Yy- SAmE 45 9-2=%I. 1107- n,UW Cf-lR,*6'r S/N[E 4.4-57 Vlsrr. -56-OW GO /N6. G."�V P07- e,064 .1 ra CNr,CK ro &Er s7*1 . BW /04/MS1 -331wp (4-4 -83) X40 -h -Y) dMt4C-ISY1 /YO /MQ 74j 3A.Vv -z3 eu ' 2-XZ4s u.Wag �PbY% ¢! 771f M x3MO7 cj.[ SZ3rr' "MIL S' '9rM,7+7 S hb - I - • -51-b rY3/U iurrr7 (-JO 231010 3q 2G pwgr.,c WO,2 3p -rNM UA"F .jd61e,7 a'W -3CL 3H! a+ 7.33W5 •> mod/ -hb-171 -6 o - ti rv:/ -r /s c&.1+5, /1 6 -Fr 6 b --g/ - 77611y7 9,1E> 41161Y9 � r✓r�yvos �/� o 7-7y72Vp C21/r/ 3L- 61201,57 nrveS- /✓/1�3 r✓j o 5tc17/ s �rr7ry��dfl limosp o+7 r�D S& S 3 > a+o - -b-6 S�%a'oa9 QL a vvx, / (YHjg`- a,L ° S 'SY�o% 0n' 117!7J9' 7e"- r'/ aw- 2tn/$' 1vr, /pl�S �O roCLJ� /✓/ 3t{L 590 2 r✓/, Y"(79 9 0aw-9 /w wnd as , s 5-0" 3uws - bb a:gu ?(vL:79 s -VM vvtzsiv -3 7?dv --emu a '7+'�77d� �� ('r`7+S (`( '10-� �o �1rY• �� n w?1 s Prvrr -taf7: s1sl� p� o/� cR? Ws -17 3�atr"7 -H �soo� �r_3 s�_ �¢, 7b-SS• G'rrr>�arr1 ��Lt+ � h2 l3 n 3N0Hd :Haawax 'M•0•2i :uzawm i3afOHd �2i0ZJtf3ZNOJ NOIIVZ)CYI Z33dLs :3W7N IHOdaU n ZN3WIliVd34 0NId33NIJN3 - S`LINIJN3 d0 AZIJ ZJ3L'OEd #r Y PROJECT NAME: "' "' ` _ '- PROJECT STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER:` ti PHONE:.'`. USiNLs 5fhriE MIX AF516AI. rv-ST pRNC-L RLSO SNOT h,e l k)Ums4N L65- 70 7t- 771n A.10 P/jESENT. WA LL Zkor F0OM A149kok • E'ZE [!' f 22 t 2 9. 711 �Jo77Urvi Oi lLf pE� G/I.�E BE�I»7_ 77E -&346t %¢.4flE !�E?9rr. Ti/lCivESS oG 4u4LC lafr16E22 6?dA -- /!/ " 9124 ckJ Pc.¢ /,$/ f/(� SLss faG(jiNG Ati�k7 P�/gGI,vG /NO2 � �ST�`!cf fvLmS /N k� �a5i$r,YyvS, �,vosE ��t,yp /dE�JivO ivRyr Ld,¢S /N�EZ7�� G✓ ice/ A- L /.4,eD �ivC� �GlBs7�4-,v7 GE .Sopiuir, S7GlG�lE _ 4�2i�9Y - .5779y�jjdm5 Ax�D .Sc✓Jiiint Sii_icit7 -E CarnNUE 912 &/ 9�4 - 7✓0 46nv, r-,q . 9LZ71?y -/()o a6nvi774 ? LAgU-6Z) JakAl 57?l7u5. 77- LET lAn1ES GO - FA< NEW rTC ,W. ADO /h AU LQiD CRS- /f�LC NfWE 7aDD,�J[�LF Ave lid AV si7,E /Zino"e&j Q6rNfi - S7�+r! FbtinS � .S�D�unt .StCIGIi+�- - Jofl,J Pc4NS fit/ / FiM5F!!u6 LulfV- 6 4 AIEX7- tvl5kK . 9[za/99 _Tafiu GEY� mESS�E oN .na clo�cE rhfr,L.— PG�1c,uG SQL gv0 L2*6_6-4. C2vvE ear- W TaN /GHT. CA$CE W!!C 6E A717,C.4i6v #t VW4 C'oyc,LE7E ON L oO,�F7t 6C4fi 7 Ala 729.465k Bu-L A "CC BE 14 61} t, G,CA -A,E JDU,&k r 7D 6,9[tf7CL &Zzukw .�64x5. jLm14WVZ+ %�tzr Wttc C,, B (SAL 62ftf- !u<!Mr 64/5 6.ociy7uE2 Gb yA+c °FJL iA{7� CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I, ,4 ES ArGu.tG PUA - "1« ACTIVITY REPORT yam. •. r._ - � - .. '?12 Y G,ea,✓E ZC r OAC 7n DATE . �iAY �tI�CMS. n. PROJECT NAME: "' "' ` _ '- PROJECT STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER:` ti PHONE:.'`. USiNLs 5fhriE MIX AF516AI. rv-ST pRNC-L RLSO SNOT h,e l k)Ums4N L65- 70 7t- 771n A.10 P/jESENT. WA LL Zkor F0OM A149kok • E'ZE [!' f 22 t 2 9. 711 �Jo77Urvi Oi lLf pE� G/I.�E BE�I»7_ 77E -&346t %¢.4flE !�E?9rr. Ti/lCivESS oG 4u4LC lafr16E22 6?dA -- /!/ " 9124 ckJ Pc.¢ /,$/ f/(� SLss faG(jiNG Ati�k7 P�/gGI,vG /NO2 � �ST�`!cf fvLmS /N k� �a5i$r,YyvS, �,vosE ��t,yp /dE�JivO ivRyr Ld,¢S /N�EZ7�� G✓ ice/ A- L /.4,eD �ivC� �GlBs7�4-,v7 GE .Sopiuir, S7GlG�lE _ 4�2i�9Y - .5779y�jjdm5 Ax�D .Sc✓Jiiint Sii_icit7 -E CarnNUE 912 &/ 9�4 - 7✓0 46nv, r-,q . 9LZ71?y -/()o a6nvi774 ? LAgU-6Z) JakAl 57?l7u5. 77- LET lAn1ES GO - FA< NEW rTC ,W. ADO /h AU LQiD CRS- /f�LC NfWE 7aDD,�J[�LF Ave lid AV si7,E /Zino"e&j Q6rNfi - S7�+r! FbtinS � .S�D�unt .StCIGIi+�- - Jofl,J Pc4NS fit/ / FiM5F!!u6 LulfV- 6 4 AIEX7- tvl5kK . 9[za/99 _Tafiu GEY� mESS�E oN .na clo�cE rhfr,L.— PG�1c,uG SQL gv0 L2*6_6-4. C2vvE ear- W TaN /GHT. CA$CE W!!C 6E A717,C.4i6v #t VW4 C'oyc,LE7E ON L oO,�F7t 6C4fi 7 Ala 729.465k Bu-L A "CC BE 14 61} t, G,CA -A,E JDU,&k r 7D 6,9[tf7CL &Zzukw .�64x5. jLm14WVZ+ %�tzr Wttc C,, B (SAL 62ftf- !u<!Mr 64/5 6.ociy7uE2 Gb yA+c °FJL iA{7� TNar NE l.jau7s -a Oucc P4Ar6y4 -% • SOnE77ME N� vo�z - Sawc�r�E I, ,4 ES ArGu.tG PUA - "1« ,3& 2E,% W4E7 DW /04 /MS1 -331wn (4 -4 -138) '?12 Y G,ea,✓E ZC r OAC 7n NWr weiV( - AIIAZ.A -V, �iAY �tI�CMS. . CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: 9-.V-9f =5 � rVgl?7S � ;5'rF?Fz- C=oA'7'7AXiE . 70-3 -9y No oyE .4r •Si>E 67,7- /r o�y,em .So,,,Eaa� wqs WOA�lNG 0,,V s7aEi�-c *,Vw 4-7w# rzAow.i. 4�*,ys Sgro Th Do Nor 1-14vE 77/F of 7p '6ew&D 4�A7t L - / /riN En- %f/sl,J L✓RLL -- 7a 7N� �!a¢7%/ • L'�2,CEx// C y 72)674E .STF$, jJ •ShK1 %'o/[n�S Ai16 A�YJDvP� 39 tliGNg1 77-yAlu loAU 7a AIOX7)-I. /o -41-9y X53 r- 6aV.16 srgci Fvg,.hs OfXd 1,AI-16707.✓L7 .514,UV rw17Y Io -S -9y • 2 Lfl�So?FJ4S •Oo,N� inoc� O< S,9r.,F. C�+-ct627 ✓oHN . 7bLO �Fim 7a G6r (ao „✓b o.�+ i?sE L„A•zc . .Jog ,S B9� f)IQ►4(ola�t7 Ou7 Ae BF <S,yor Ew� TD Moowz- of //Rr o,-Vk• V^g-3s eyatww"16 70 A�- S- They V?"cv hA,& -,v /'667&126 e.✓E AOAE 77rHE. la - 4u 3 L ,Fes 0-91A,& /hoR•E Sl"E , /0 -7o -9y fvQ,mS 7o c3E WO1fAEb a 3 A/ _TD _5-H0r -6,0 T7= L, &EX SEZr7a -J 0.-1 41o&!5 4 U 70 -77-9V 10-12-9y 7,Z-5+7,v6- 77-(4-r 64w-r- Fisk e�V Osr P6;+cE 7 -z7- 9y h,.e 7 !E No/ziV ✓oHid 16 Go,NC� Ta 4E-G4tC . AAA. -Sb Q /TS _snu. COL. J5:c7A27 �.�o Ecr ??oho XgFmuaSnNb /D- ,3 - 9(1 Co,U%OE+J /.) .r,E 777.rT 7hgj AyCE �/,4Yh�L /'I,�,�xJG.,rc ,Qi�f_�(ticnfs• 717th owFS ,(�• Co.,.•n, G�r�„rg =° A--A7 A VA17 D • - Co.. d,7- Ou,- uA.nL ,S 42±1.x• CLAte7au 61e.L&W we- ° * LAs7- '. EL e- . Az)o& 4” hirEy Witt cwi ..,. ' /1l& l F 77.vCe -a4 !G 0,77y 022EL7 ALwb 6oA,. ✓OAW C -14"V. /h a,. , 51yoe7- "P,liR- e""WA °^ ° v ��"� BW /04 /MS1 -381wp (4- d- BB)Z,o,, G✓7^� DBK w,rrs N ✓�•�^( CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Pao ; •�; PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: /0—/e - 9 V Z-5—let ues rEZWe c., F2 Q.J War By � //-E A,,,,, r�N S/A a 7hE� LLEe 4AA619it /V6 nErAlb STEAL ETC. .J61-1A) N /(/EA) ,#-T 7 °30 1" C-�n T- . /1' Cl�Nry TD C-,+yvT AA/ ADI/fFNLE si r� !N OAS T• /1ZS, X IiO NT ThINt //-S c�.� oA: SEC QE7t�RA/t� � eircc . ;LfF SA-iQ /7S ,q,ze .� r u C.,�t, .3EC,9isE Th ✓FrLE ��"79z7N Now � SHca6r c�,00E,¢ �,�/ptL .4.�D - AI« /'ii4i / /NG TYG6�gLE SGNL��y Ll.✓(e N. Cd✓Nlt -� [p v N/v r lE �Jt [+f[ISE ]Y� E�j 7�7L F Owr /9ruu /7-f�7f- ✓o Fi 9y No A cnv ,Tl -11-Z- 9'1 /o�.�/ o ei�.ayLL� SGF/4�ULQJ S/�bru�ETivG oG t E�7� A4 7h4-r- /T 6rA3 ffJ2 GuE�,,/Lblr 9i�/ flt cA LAS P..sr • � 7h/s 4/VE- 15 C'f+7VGEu -�� ilG `sLJ IV' N>tiJ �N! Tr- N,fhVTS rhGNEU Oil _ 1�OA/7 �(/S Tim& . ,SEG A16T H,920o04 /,✓/714 z fl�Ur ° ihEA +% So 7hEy AnE /A/ oeocgs oG Loot -e AN& A> /2 AW6I?aEYL j pLG ✓o&/j .r ZIONT 7} -IlANit !T" /S Our- Uc' Le.uE FU/C /1' Cl�Nry TD C-,+yvT AA/ ADI/fFNLE S /Nr� �� wE�•� !N OAS T• /1ZS, X IiO NT ThINt //-S - R- GaoP /061 Hpfur fr- Or- G4A'ryt^ -cryR- GJ••�E. Oy— *WHO rS Nar- w r YYf sl> IIS4 /04 /MS1 -J©1wp (•1 -1 -IIII) CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: //-9 -9'/ s//gc2Ei sC- N�U�Ea 7aofte 4`14-5 C-- 4,vcEU m. i7- r�ouco vd5zDe- sum . /� -9S/ l- rP✓!/E,r2 GyALIi SGf/EDGLd 36- 51407- Ar- 9:� // -/4/- 9// 7bm l�vcL:uE72 GEi'T /h�tsE 71/FtT G iro/h6�T /i✓.4'S LE% Ai' %}200NG16/4T GV/�/L 3 QAy �D LrDAy G✓E�KE�.D Ar�/J h/fh�n fi D,cyc�7- ��w� sOsr,� • LEVY -T _ r�E�SR�E -,ems /na�lE try 4!5d&u ,1 &rE 7- Acy.,BJ ooeY- DL -- sY,� 7D Lq�jC � Sr�� AT CLa<..7oN GUr4L/ 1 D.D. TT CD G�,3o s 7� -rA-r 7)7&7-F" G(1+S CoTS Ole' VLSI �r rti 4� /� 6-er771,- FG• �5 O (' /1= 14AIIAW� I r DoNr SPEC 1-2 17ou PS SffoTC,r�• /9 - %5r f7l7/ Cg1LE72 /O� cjt/ Am L4D7 y /N6, 7)y*T / /zW" L,..v rt IS ScHEnUtl --rte 77, aF 7h.,., 2Rx,J /vE NEi7 1,77OQW7 ti707.766� • r haVE�JL lS 6U7- 124N �lL.�� �S AyA/LfiBLE. TLLd Jo//r� � r'YLirl9,uc�E 7�-ud SGfIE27U�E 7Y�/zoU/iy R-07-) i/�NE tr'S & /v,57J, o"T, // ZS 9l/ JOP d L 7rEsSAlvE. (37v bN N• EL Po, t /N /u- ,BF /YlovG -2). Gv SD //- 3o-95r O.� ��- q,�ya,�/ St7Fc...►tC , NE 1S L o/Lkrpb up F� fJcw� Td Su°,�nrT 77 A/c- /NTawcs Td �i N,sF7 /NAL[. �GLCr STE%�S %}ND i7 cLOA�) BW /04 /MS1 -381wp r n- �TT b CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT - ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: �~ PROJECT NUMBER:' STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: THAT Gv4[l Cu.�? -Ewers uuOEY� CoruSr�t. /tt�aN S�U N EZ %�o/Ar�t. hq-S A- Go�v._�REY�oR L.fJ[iH 4 HASE Q4,4,✓[.,6 ti OruN F[e oG ecu�. Ale /laY czng - /fnx -s sr7w7" 1)14-7- h E or n titer tv a7-) 7- ih av /`;,7Ar I/e SA,a H95s C.o.rw 7a o/C -IU4 s O4?6WM4? T- gF trrsE LfE 4tia4'1_0 r-teE -M 00 7p0 . 11-_A2-9y Zoe ti• a Fo/ta( -71" 6c_ /kaUr2� ->�d 145 ljG 2 7" 6✓4- S -TJc6 77,? O' 5/P-6 llz ' VIAI/( er_7y S S�G1L2r fiC� ° EXS H4�T- 6;47.61 /T 4-. ,fs S[7c,( b ,66T /hou�27 Lsa � �}cc F pm t%¢Al. �2r ✓E crhn� fj,✓o [r- 6,v,s 7bo q&WVGe Tb PI C4 ET �.�cur arc �� [rte ,�laurc �v �- fz ern out Fna, -, 1N6 1Oc 7V 17- /(i 5 z /hv2E D s. /Z -Z - N EL /JoGr�rL Situ /�Erc�. 12--5-911 45 46-/ fjJ Dtlr ISIC,T IgAJ/> /oN.0 LAj? Cr94GE17 ^17✓.- 5,30 /T zulgs 5c4rz YWG5D 7b BEE !l+ou6O 7dDr►( ✓oH .s az 50 �i 5e/N(o a .SUB /91/ me- 73 a5 %��Gr�i�O /if/d fY ul�f lL 13AC CGilL MAR /AL lDQ r3/E Cj6 2672 CL9r,Tp U Gu�¢t 3= 00/✓en - S/'y S'nu, SERE 7 42 -61- 9q B/N 5771(- 1,,CX6 A5 Of- 2-7 - ?C/ [3") ov N - a Potr,4 -C /uo�c� 91 /2EC&-kE27 CQZl_ Faorn ti6/LHr A'9r-kA /� ✓ lYtour/wv' DW /06 /MS1- 78lwp (•1 -I -OD) CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: /2-lZ -95! CElL- CRE7E QRP tV'45 Ar J /7E� -;0e2A /3AC�situ. G//J/�ER LUHLL_ u�f7t! Arl/ Lf}ST7 ELL S7Y� /uZED FILL - f3Q£A OG 6ACL�j(L r2A�vG Ez9 rfzo�h 3 r< 3' 7a '51 L, 5 (. nm AT YI-AO 7�9C�.v6 7,--5r5. 71y(c Confr�oL oN NEl'�NE r;aoa. 1-3 -95 To" Cgu.EU [a4S r l/E woULo Cis 4Welu& / 772tlaZ 4r G[, Tp us Ar Fi.¢ 77l DAV 7: syvp cogaCEuA0. SEC "/45 SC"r--nuLev 7b PoaA 4 cfds 4/ sr,e�s cvEp� r�, 4 um,�¢ Sir Ar 6aSE aG GufFL[ Zi uPP efG Cop- vEe GufflelI 6 "D A107- GET S-1YOrC245rE 01E- 14-"7UNS. ,4gjar x 5rr qGL 131-oLV al1T /N .Sffo7ZneA-7E /N Z AaG -,2 LUf}LL • ( ,Y,y q C1i A, /" I /n ,n L/,v OExz /A7VQ A-30VE C p "c- /e E7E 7�011CC PuGLEa up A� /•' SS pn . Jjo ee ELL 6U /ou07 -L 14&5 4 7/7r- 7B 7L-57- CoAlCREW. L�o.e2ElL r 7bm CcY�,nFlz ,O /irriS�F L�R�cD D6W/U L, co t - .EC oc,eqNEo oG� 6x-xw. . #3 T >4-160A s A,6xE 30V 400Wt;LLE7J 6,,E-12E .4PPpok• /&" D.C. P y Suows IZ "Ox - 7am , poa&iEEc �' i fYGiG� 66Tsa SF 7-ho we-ne usr1.),- STEECu VwE-S t wK(C -EC .D /jJ Iu,� Show 6P o[ A+1 I�'IIS (.ucvuV Doe #,a. OEx[r A&-x- 7D c HECL oti Carc_2� -rC &egox '(Z ha.• t,MSR- WOKI) ('_ArnE Gflcw sdE -1--)-!Ai Eoc. wks SE'I -yr gAcL ► i uaD Sou aA -r E-b oje7- 7- Aoaas �Gc, - 5Ec o 5-nLL Hite >*;ou•` 2- ka - I (.rr_ WO" oL- I,,,c atC TD STt� BW /04 /MS1 -381wp (4-4-88 (boaT-e- rr w P-S �-eao C� Aun f iA KS W L R P� F VN� DoRfE.L ViPaL C'_ C`. LAS SExcr cCIL. 5EC- Lurks IMSISTANT -ro t r C.eW BE A6(.E -m ?bo (2- tloQD. UuOEa Pima. 'ME(.1 Lpme Tbw Nb• Pt*tJ5 WeSe- AT SiT&;�• 1>2Ro -(- wfts A,9r4i.L j-a k- 21D . I N ui -f--. a- A. 5-ET oG P• S - CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT �' W&VOWME421 PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: It c E ryE%� C sILL Qom y u i F ST�i�� �r7 A CeauEt,p¢ 60-Z r r,'cjAS �62N& 4werh �d GET cc rlN oo&j a 7D ulwFx t me /vx C3AC.eh[G , V&iAw S17� 7DO.Lk4 . No st'l s. M . '� T CLEAN SAAJ/IJ 141 AS 'LNG Co% ✓El�uiL 6EZlR7 .DuwN -70 &PP& -7C Lc.¢Lc fvrt +ctFr T , CAP GR2� E SEt nvN cr C�w�ce�7� L�►Sliti'4, av 5to .SEC u as THi2uiu,�v�., CHu� r� a,Ek wf+cc 1lw�N A,�D 1 TLLO � -1E.Jn NO /'2S -9S ./ol�N GAGGED Arid �S,r,,O R�EFZ Gvouc.O 66 7-D &C-7- A- fiAcC H&6- OJ o uN 72 C L!!5�7DNS 7D CGO9,v l.lL cSr/".S • &C& IOC- t�&AS iN �ofiiBCE mom,' Alt y 4,49 l460 VA) 6.677>Ae, 72> v,W CZZ- w�cc Ln,G ,6a- c�Fi�c . aScu 55y.�.� W1ivr 7 f� o� Kcr�i /�nsv% �ou�.o lva�C i4.c/b ACce55 cA) 7llF Lde?vcf/. ✓oNN 10G5o 7&65 ^6" 7h,.r u�o ,c Sri° ht/o 2 �Pizmo o��EZ r ¢cam c,<cc. 6E Tbino,to(oW . s 4eZ29 72> 07146E � z7/.vy• Jpi/N 5a�0 7NEt� Guovco m 4tE f+ Lvov ER fat mE 7D GE> Dowd 1 ��o flak /fc,d opt ,Pl.A�.4c 1 IN OOC.kj IIAVC- iD BE C067D Z CaEr A[-6,44� 0,46. DW /04 /MSl -331wp (4 -4 -88) CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: R.O.W. NUMBER: W11002F 45 CoNt.RC'(1= 60-413bu I--Z F:D/Z 1 I •-z3Q Ah Tho!tT •1 T A"W69 A4r .SITE AT 11'20A,,A • -Rd Lu St7 uP AL6A)6 W iT14 �4c)SE • UPPER STEP wf1-3 6 fVR6tj qo A5 wt--L4-As {pn�2 2 blow ours - I Ar Ft,rc+ -,L)ppTZ coa. e:n agdL is �x�00LE • BLe?tC.N ,.Ufo6 0590 TD i2t-mouE ^LI. A•E 5f-L-1°. R;z5T 7nrkE C>K; 1o8 Tk4r 5•C•C. LQAs C1oNCe� A- �.cz�uEn AT SATE i4.plorzy.,.. It'.�FS,ti.�. =r Letr I-HE PLOOT AT to :4Z A,K. Tz)m CooPE7z Al- S,TE A-> WLat. At 5H4k)N AHL40 Faz t•Jurrif+-,u 1-485. 5EL r3EtnrtM F!drvtPsN(, CgD"cZeTE A�r 12'10 pM Tir% f 1 STAR -rm UppE7Z Co/L�uE2 oG wRU. P� ,2••,S �� 3" h�E BEGAmE C L o&&ED. SEC. wA5 C!2 �L,�X)o N 6 AA j X Tbo 1>12,4 - 5+404µ1N% WAS Co.U(.6eNsp Al2)CUT AZ101N(l PJMfW-. HE � /. ► u •urn' - �- }405f 1,V/-5 A)oT A-ZLr= 7b e& U1JCL6C�60D ,d'-) rirkE A-NO QT IZ.yZ �M ConJG¢ETE WAS REfEtTiW . 2 h¢5• Tar711L 10 T ZU c K GvA•s 7NE m)41J P-EASON Fob tZ QjEZn a-1. ofl4ep- R�oN S wATE p "DEB I' L hR . AFTEiZ Tpau c- r Leff PLwNT SuPSbsE Tb 6E /Food WITH 'IL h,c. TURNS buT up •h 6D qdA. AoouD. r t?,nckm 514ok.1N 13v 155u1,u1� A- STUB wolek oROEl:;k. sir F11¢S7- JC)W N06W IN As Coo„ -n eoN Tr Ou E ,tl✓-1 Lu+4ca t3u7 me a16x;r. H E A5L9] :5 RAi.,,u TD rp. g T:usrS, Ter►+P• , Sc.u!LAP. ETC. 7ZF5T5 TIrfAnJ Air ( :oo pw)- TAY) • - 7o' 5 LUP P 5112-" _�T�'�?l' ftrJ A$SOwrB µES. WM,.tn �ok� [-tE trams ru (/,oLAna1 4P tuLET Z0L4i)5Me*s%k. jt& 6A6y,,B7 ,NLrT S rZ?" Joko r UoUL,O GE AE�ACL 4-1- 5rrc AjF 3-wtg.. DW /04 /MS1 -331wp (•1-4 -83) - b µA•tE Su4E S 3kr UA5 -5QPTL2S5• w r� a�trtN>p�'c� 5,� of FcAo WO1 µno 7d w- 8>r L"OsHw oFF• T. jol. Ttl� -si J oHa��14i C L,( pp, ut.5 FRS^ `'A° 3W Fr T1tAr L e qtr r�Lt 1. Au ovlt Be»t� YkUSi F3F C Lo'a1 e6 uP , w.uti b-in CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: 1-30-11s S /x lcc T2) 10 HIJ . (21nj 'rztco,, ED NEW vW rc LESi6Al POUR UA-)M SoTH '( -f'4 -u 4 C$IiCt PA-U6 f�ao¢cuep. POUR. 15 T6F-Nr. SG H M U L AM 7bAt,oRrYq.J **l, Tb OAt S &Z- IS CJ.1RN(.lAl O-i& -R TL - 15EXEW- CbAjl(Qfoiz SySTE),k. I-)t t2GU- COAJTU U (E 1Z) 1 Rm+LKlb+�i Sn� L oWtiz- X41FF l-31 -9S P6zo�7„9rz 7,egAY5 rr._ xl,c RRRIVE fiT �s m ,g72o3pn. 4, e67- Pc.¢,vr 4r- is 3z Pm. Jo HA/ T/iQ 77 A o< XVMg j L"S 4r S174E. 2. 13E6,q.v Puf)7 2rIA6 u�oER CoR.y6? �' �P^' o7T/Ere No[ E i,v "44. 6.w.¢5 P un�o�Z: 32 ro,., - Town Ca�e.� <+aR wEd Z.'$ /P.•� PRES5UoOE rN NOSE C,4u.5EV .N 7D geE?W i47 /own 3:202 • 2'12 f-/osE BaoJe:t7 A 2.VV 7rnE• 73415' nmE rT ,t3,eoLE /h �0 Nose _ NOT 4r „!0„)7 -. Jo,S'N -5.4.10 PLASnC /zE¢ S4ouc.D NUT UayE gQFrN AtVkV U.vnL Zk)ei � wgst A-eoEb )S, Sr //7/ K Tau brew w( sLU.y A-T 2 "• flRn 7NE 5 t-UrnP b&-E-)U 3'� �„ Jr mfw WAAS- guoaxEV. P2- 457702E.e CO3v4l6?&-7E Go of/. S7XF,2T 1N& AA/U ,57UP0i� PUile�YtiG o�F+�7o.0 t7ro �/aT 2 -f -9S 2cv�,ai,viNC� .S�+ArO 1.�A5 TTZs+usp�.ZTZ� pur,�.w 'rD ac-9 IuRU_ VIA Coy(Jf!jW- BEtr fVsrt-)A. SADtE Wl7N fooyt,) *r . C'od/cepE SE11in,E7ilrs 774A 6WElVr r,crn 5ry4 a R-6cpv7Lcr t --1+sH b ouT .N �N % oG /bo 64-•Y6 5i 9,Z0 it . rS vE"Y uPS�T. ✓oH.D �1Rxa /1� Ger ,�C�lr o,L� ri. 3:OOPm VERiFJEZ) Tr l,I,4S CLEnNE1J UP. -3- 9S 5AVO op LkPPE-�2 wal-L- / &-u'jF Cc,& -njAiP5• DW /04 /MS1 -3O1wp (.1- •1 -00) CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT '*i 1 PROJECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: R.O.W. NUMBER: PHONE: � � ' � •%,,;ter r [ 'ox. f i-h-A1 Su6mlflo SNoWS [p' 6utOE DEVicF• EC cu"gAjTs 7D 02444 7T 20'- PLAW TD 86- S•U61r7117ZV 7a Nr+- s Fop- ng4A VA6. 3-10-95 Y",-96 6W4SioN OEl/lCE riW aRl6t1s11- ?06A4AZS 6v ,4s. Cok p«7ZO 7iW( IvEEK I l0' Gv rC1E } R EC67VEW 2 J� Acrwsn,• 41�'W /=a,c 7D�u4tCow DW /04/MSl -3o1wp (a -•i -ooh CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: C G.i?[77DA1 SEAGuAr PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: TELEPHONE: 3IZ0�9S LgST d�J PLA-NN /NG COin /SS/oN Ca�avE /4j�o,W/�4L � E�C%+/D EA°11,$ /dA! L'OA.ITR�Y 1�Y/CE ON SLgI -� /►ffiO.!!'` Geg -[L. �_,�.� /D' 7-p 2or W/o E• 7770/ .S EL !a9 4 /[o /AKA fii�D /TIo/v� /O'. 24,11095- -7011AI CAtLE27 Ax/tl JAPD AVA9ZL WAS 6L6.L /Z60 t,>(/E_X 645-r 3 _c�Ee/Ks AND 6s T?2" OU coi aa. - IOf/A,� �.A,0 3rEps s9AW 77E- Cs !ti /6c ffE CrX b </Zt27 lqf- A- rU/te OAr� o vcE nE- 64cts ,ycE -w&-,s;56y rwo cwec- oczx,u Se7rZ 06W14-) A;vtl &OW-4 /9ad;s /^/WQvES Fa,c slays m 512719S -56C CUN77A/UE3 %D a/04-C GN EROSIc A) C.o.VTY2u�- OEU /C� 3109/c15- u���e E�6 s /o u c 6 n /�o A�EVrc� cv - -t06G7m' B/.3i /9s :5-4c 601rm //,sio✓ �P��� uapEA2 cSOLO /E,Q P /tE GuRCLS. s 12.5195 t6opjF, 2 nE - A44tL C ,+"° x�Was&-Z2. CEAr7F.c I= �OAm - RKE/VE7> CAtt- /aXgpiy 7ilgr 7a .5A1-v4&45-- (..7=RC C2E/<+ 47- J& -IMA/G A CC17 - AWC X- /A•7a vc uFf. SOvXi 7D [bN. NE Sr4 /D No 6A& 19f C4.+g7d41 . s k� sncL of yarap yE A LC;L /T O' -fD SQL Bo20KE [�W�al/ tO Sioit/G $E79»o5 oN%o FG+r -orw. E7C. 73/), Co0,06?Z sm FgJ 4P 7/4T f'/E scour /N 14is l/6�I /CCE, l�:C�,q./K _ wEJV7- 7a yA4R�. ASK, wAS 6o/AI& av • 7 Gv6RCi7n r/.+ AiRO Y HE 13[.fbn60 fD,t c /n, /npo5/xw� GvaR.k -- open - =ooAr- ow AAGR/Cv n./*P 1-6i✓ 77DE5 AlW06ri1 Ar 2-3 /Mt . TIE iA ol4C 7rosc rnmES ^A/rcv 7DOAy liAs co cb�r ��D T G Ea/r 77) WA T. /< NE 7h1N6 hE c rN /S 1dfM1FA/4j DR/hESaLb /Ex %0 /[-e5 Ar 4k4yT 7D L [v6&to 1-/op/ '+ C t,05 kL A� 04AaR6 Z ntO N //n NE 6XAS (� OfSOAK, /N 5�pt27/j21 7P CA1.4r16E 721p+E 70 41 n6&AueXy wh(rGH (Si 7 Ro6612 Aw4r AtC I-)iE ,009,4916 y+oK�v /yR+/E 70 OG frd Alrti 4�3:(04N 'yo 00&4A0 AW gotd/ /6S /* r}JxC6 . L E LIr�Y eLi /,�j 6X041 nmE /•vANo 5n4C i 6NfX 7D 7)7B14 • %1so L 77•J,S Pfo/fCE!�7/ 4107- Crst' /A-Po5,629 %IoUCS, ebQ/CdE7C lNSar. r Z (,v/js ?CJu A/or AorM79V AA/0 4EU+45 A-4/ .SET W 6FAZ6c f39A6 7LLA7 of C404a64A404 . y 30} CR4,UE/ 0146CHOE AW441A,6 Ca.70A�,cff� AA(O IJA4r 6E77 &-Nrj52 66;4W. S- 'ZO�vt— cone /)oAtXi1A/cr/du /,GL 0A/ 64va CQ+4NE /Wlu.A4or- DowN- M14429 (/ry /«P2FS5/o// Ivk5 77i Do A.nT L'WW A6r n tVSwo76 R•) .S• y3,ov, /6-r CeAN00 -40ggv %RiAGK/ -? /N s}LC . 5.55,4., c X4,vE {rrrc A07' 6&"," IA) . C e-6" 6E4 4A L EDW ViNG , 6 Co fbw - CR 4 �E CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PROTECT NAME: STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: PELEPHONE: G !S 95 C2/ Ff+o/n a a"1Rro A" near Hrro C3,Qouc Hr- 84-CX TD yl4RU RT Gg57- A/f4Hr l5 LGVN ClC ✓H( TtMf> SECS 19EX.h 175 iuC C- Rt-VOKEV. �T- La. /tC dE !7NAL�t� Ar N£Rr 4+eL-*S COGNGfc. /tie&pAl& . (lA C660¢R- /Ir %)/ /S �WNT nL 7h [Li V•!K /5,tF A*IQ 7.0 ,¢ESUrnE /,u 569-17-c 4� 6.46.,e any. / 7 -25 -95 S.d wvGZC� �A�o� /24 -l.A. Llr 1 �Erhng D2cl/E7V ONE 41.45 DR(kew 5 FT .4A(p 3 GvE?zE DoeLpeN 61 7°7-. JAcK L 1197ninEF7 tior- N4VE OO&VA/ 6VjW,0 Fa¢cE SU Th� 4,eE ^0'4y. "6 7P GET f� Sr'xUA((pEIQ aNE. 7 -ZS-95 VfBR4 f1/r» ff-,R Ar- Erfo o< ce./JrN/�•�E�N, W/�s ,&,e #UGFIT our 7?-f /S MojfW(A(G I =36,". 5l PQ6vfals E?9rn5 6vEr-E oEA=oVE27 9ND 2G7°L.4cE� 8�'Z.9L(SE of DG`7'Tj/ "%Zo Btaruse a!ku u/t` sKEVV. ft LL /o ,BE�'lms ruE7QE Pc�tcgJ R7UO Thr� ruc`XE AOf Th'E c��tcy av 7 36nrh. I GErhn P;4 7?-?LF5r Sours/ t",y -s nN�v oKrvrN �y T � u�y ��srccsE � �.B.�A�ON u..�+s css�.IS.MG B wH sd 67 I& 7b P-rf 6!c Op2/zi 'TL SQi7H. 2 -nZ LfuSr»aC� T'p 6EZv1,u f / /7yr, ,7 Alp iZ L/-�7E (7-1 i4i" C LA� 7UA) 15 Q 4L-e N/S R(l� k1470 TZ Sozr,EDNE Aco,Nc TO/NA/ !,vice- TXu TD 0&-7- M � l'e ,ar nrtf f>fNNG7Z. I ,S CA 7�f -95 4F. C, /U&— /->7 / /hey SfHE rLan 7a QFyn ovE /NU f,,zo/h FjgLF OF CLvKjrbNS 8'05-95 /D yds. oL SfIoTGRE7E S�RAY� ON La eEZ' s?�pS F�q G04E-T7!_ QUQ.00SES. /}/J UGR noa 15 Sn O�yii2 ..J &LSALl rflC1/ 7l1,47- O/GEXEV ra ea- &: C3,4G.� s!A•� /z ELOl�`T. RUNNi Af& LuftTEA2 ZtV,4S C6k"eAl& Ovr C2G IJ�ii /NS ,4r 7DP SJ�77 ,¢� /fj CASC/+OiAI� od.?,wN ^4z 77OP5. Z-&&WE .5//o7 -64e7F Ov�yC �y/Uiy.NbGy�7TF� Bur -D -0244 -iNC 7D LafVEX S7&r. S TC�£TC lv.45 fvor sncG.uG wHEXE (,-n7E-R- 4-1 S IOVA/,11,A6 uPPEX! 77 4G7 jffACKs ALbo ce 47 a. M14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT Iwaeft2144mil: \yIaH STREET LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PERMIT NUMBER: TELEPHONE: 11-29 -95 ,PEC'D CALL. FROM JOfr . ,P j2,Qyq IS /w 77/E F 4671v(, /huvE77 Q 07HQE22 6w UST S/o c Ay,v vs. v /s„ 5 i12F) A/o /1C77"7t/ Re bor,dv 7a usE 4 R&leX D'E!,tL 6,v,47+& +T CL,r /47- LowE�P ClEFy�oV� 7ty40 A9HkloCaxj bC-A Ou L=s. 7-DC" JON.J N0. 77+'S /S A £�'foF1E a/l�C�b /h16. /Z-Z/ -95 /2 &C67r� ✓oNti. rtsE co e,etzrlo.j ti ro r7C,:57- fart w &-L-7" /A/ 77-11P-4W / Col D ✓o r,WS /S "7- C/ 4-eIW72C /r FxW /vf X14 1E r� 4LK/E. / v- Ce) � r /G rFrE c / G F -}-/4/ rr- iq L C177� C1 <yLc ,�r� ¢GSe Sfir<% SEA f1- QOUE/ LUOVr SNbCJ G��/E71 /H/tt, 1S T}?zE 17, oe C9 -v6- rT. 5f5Lewae22 4st rL 61011-& 70 F p 'ROCS �% 12-7- -9-s- s nCv&� Fae ✓oN(J.- /� Llo .�ioT CoCOe gkjAa- s✓ UA r7[ 2j r. s o 667r�� Gea C• rrce >7r,+r w•4cL L4 17Woc4r- r7 6&?AI6 /- /9 -96 n/q C/NCNGrST GrvGN 7D o",4j 6-2-9-9A, Z -4-Sr- o< "JCFIL/ST /Tblrs c'o,r,,Xo-av, o. T. -5 m14429 /'hors y[ -rvKl 3H'-P $era .eE m4PIV6 1Kc65s 4-16-9k 0454507304 FOLAR8;D'D3V 1vvoMu&kr 96.4c-/Y 8E?%&S- ,4KA16 Act-C-65 a W I N TELECOPIER TRANSMITTAL LETTER Date: a Total pages including this page: To: RAQS Of (Comnanvl vQ/1X 7W �t�1G(�S, �yq , r JW From: �'� ml 2211110-kemam- FROM RB INDUSTRIES 02/08/96 14:50 Z� i- Cc, A*—ArY— / s•��1 3> 16ces SrAcK�z Shy, �1NE -�S O�/�f�R�SFS y�3 - 9 °24 RB INDUSTRIES "9919 ROSPOcl A1, 30099, CA 92D71 619.44 8-3930 FAX 618.448 -7124 P. I 0 W v ; STATE OF CALIFORNIA —THE RESOURCFS AGENCY PETE WILSON, G.w CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO COAST AREA 3111 CAAUNO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 100 SAN DIEGO, CA 911061717 (614) 511 -8036 EMERGENCY PERMIT Mr. Edward 5, Boyd (name) 630 Neptune Avenue (street name & no.) Encinitas. CA 92024 (city, state, zip) 6- 96 -16 -G Emergency Permit # February 7- 1996 (date) • E A . AH7.Ti 1TtiSIE1•T�SiU . = Location of Emergency Work Ave 1 ., 1 •.. . , non-engineered r11 1 work requested Dear Applicant: This letter constitutes approval of the emergency work you or your representative has requested to be done at the location listed above. I understand from your information and our site inspection that an unexpected occurrence in the form of undercuttina of the bluff toe and block failures requires immediate action to prevent or mitigate loss or damage to life, health, property or essential public services. The Executive Director hereby finds that: (a) An emergency exists which requires action more quickly than permitted by the procedures for administrative or ordinary permits and the development can and will be completed within 30 days unless otherwise specified by the terms of the permit; (b) Public comment on the proposed emergency action has been reviewed if time allows; and (c) The work proposed would be consistent with the requirements of the California Coastal Act of 1976. FROM RD INDUSTRIES 02/08/96 14:S1 P. 2 The work is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. The enclosed form must be signed by the property owner and returned to our office within 15 days. 2. The work authorized by this permit must be completed within 30 days of the date of this emergency permit. Only that work specifically requested as described above and for the specific property listed above is authorized. Any additional work requires separate authorization from the Executive Director. 3. The randomly placed rock revetment approved under this emergency permit is considered temporary and shall be removed within 180 days of the above date unless a regular coastal permit is approved to maintain the rock for a longer period of time as an interim measure. 4. In exercising this permit the permittee agrees to hold the California Coastal Commission harmless from any liabilities for damage to public or private properties or personal injury that results from the project. 5. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain necessary authorizations and /or permits from other agencies. 6. OTHER: See attached Exhibit A If you have any questions about the provisions of this authorization, please call the Commission's San Diego Area Office. EMERGENCY PERMIT APPROVED: Charles Damm, District Director FROM R8 r-N-UUSTRIES 02/08/96 14:51 P. 3 Additional Conditions of Approval 6a. Disturbance to sand and intertidal areas shall be Ci!nimbizjg�. Beach sand excavated shall be redeposited on the beach. Local san les, or shoreline rocks shall not be used for backfill or construction materials. No excavated footings for the revetment, filter cloth blanket or other features common to permanent rock revetments shall be permitted. b. If the property subject to this emergency permit is placed in escrow prior to removal of the rock revetment, then the permittee must record a deed restriction, in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director, prior to the initiation of such escrow proceedings. The deed restriction shall state that, by accepting this emergency permit, the applicant and any successors in interest hereby agree to remove the rock revetment within 180 days of the date of this emergency permit or seek approval of a regular coastal development permit to maintain the rock for a longer period of time as an interim protection measure as specified in Special Condition Ili of this emergency permit. The document shall run with the land, binding all successors and assigns, and shall be recorded free of all prior liens and encumbrances. c. The construction or placement of any accessory structure, including stairways or other access structures, walls, fences, etc., are not authorized by this emergency permit. d. Within 10 days of issuance of this emergency permit, the applicant shall submit to the Executive Director for review and written approval, evidence of acknowledgement by the State Lands Commission that the proposed revetment will not prejudice the ability of the State Lands Commission to require permits, leases or other approvals for this or any other structures proposed on State Lands at this location. (0B51A) FROM RB INDUSTRIES 02/08/96 14:52 P. 4 Y I AOIMAU0012 \Y .1 �\Y Emergency Permit No. 6- 96 -16 —G Instrutttons: After reading the attached Emergency Permit, please sign this form and the acknowledgement form (Exhibit A) and return within 15 working days. I hereby understand all of the conditions of the emergency permit being issued to me and agree to abide by them. I understand that the emergency work is temporary and a regular Coastal Development Permit is necessary to maintain the work for a longer period as an interim measure. Signature of applicant(s)�— Name EDWARD BOYD ress 630 NEPTUNE AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 FROM RB INDUSTRIES 02/08/96 14:52 P. 5 TOTAL P. 5 SOIL rmanErninia cons-Liucrlon.K. D*-�u April 29, 1994 Engineering Depar`- - - +- City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Av, G �yI Q Encinitas, CA 9 Attention: Hans � N- �- �O/L� !.✓ESE �2.vigG 'P air at GvC__ Cs4icJ s Dear Mr. Jensen ix�1zEGVi�lEtZ, In accordance w ! ®mac(( t :tion (SEC) has prepared a l p / t North E1 Portal Street, 7� �+•- - '-(r �QQ ae prepared an outline of t__. `' his letter. This plan is based upon the conaiu�..... _ -_ site. SEC plans to make every effort to remediate portions of the existing pavement and landscape. Upon receiving your approval, SEC will begin work. If you should have any questions or require any additional information regarding this plan, please call the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yi SOAk ENGINEEI j LV. , n W. Nivei Contractor's r w�-(�26 619 South Vulcan Avenue, Suite 210 • Encinitas, CA 92024 • (619) 944 -4124 • FAX(619)634-2401 General Engineering Contractor License A- 268082 s SOIL rmonaninc consiqurlon.K. Dsvu April 29, 1994 Engineering Department City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Attention: Hans Jensen Plan of Action for Repair North E1 Portal Street Encinitas, California Dear Mr. Jensen: 0 In accordance with your request Soil Engineering Construction (SEC) has prepared a plan of action for remedial repair at North El Portal Street, adjacent to the Millis property. We have prepared an outline of the proposed repairs and is attached to this letter. This plan is based upon the conditions observed at the site. SEC plans to make every effort to remediate portions of the existing pavement and landscape. Upon receiving your approval, SEC will begin work. If you should have any questions or require any additional information regarding this plan, please call the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION -- �" ' dktn W. Niven Contractor's License No. 268082 Ape in 619 South Vulcan Avenue, Suite 210 • Encinitas, CA 92024 • (619) 944 -4124 • FAX (619) 634 -2401 General Engineering Contractor License A- 268082 .l N END OF OF SANt EXISTING 5' HIGH ICE PLANT olN r � �i • PHALT AND START ASPHALT CONCRETE (1" THICK ON SAND E r a a F a 0 a a w z F 0 O z BLUFF EDGE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB (BURIED UNDER SAND /SOIL) 9' EXISTING BRICK PATIO MILLIS RESIDENCE RIVE WAY EXIST L NEPTUNE AVENUE 1.) 2.) 3.) 4.) 5.) NOTES PREPARE TOP OF BLUFF AND PLANT GROUNDCOVER AND SHRUBS (3). (AS SHOWN ON DRAWING) REMOVE ALL BROKEN AREAS OF PAVEMENT AND SAWCUT TO UNIFORM SHAPE. REPLACE PAVEMENT TO EXISTING THICKNESS AT AREAS OF BROKEN PAVEMENT AND /OR AS FAR AS TO WITHIN 1' OF FENCE LINE. FOLLOWING ALL PATCHING, APPLICATION OF TOP COAT WITH SEALER. INSTALLATION OF 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE. (AS SHOWN ON DRAWING) CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER �. ?ROPOSED 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE '.COP OF BLUFF REPAIR AREA EXISITNG GRASSY AREA EXISITNG SAND /SOIL COVER EXISTING ESTABLISHED (. I 1 I V P G v l: 1 v 1 1 a 0 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PEERMIT PERMIT NO.: 3835TE PARCEL NO. : 256- 051 -1000 PLAN NO.: JOB SITE ADDRESS: 638 NEPTUNE AVE. APPLICANT NAME CLAYTON (CHARLES L.) ADDRESS: 12785. AMARANTH ST. 92129 PHONE NO.: 619- 484 -0212 CONTRACTOR : SOIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION INC. PHONE NO.: 310 - 831 -0298 LICENSE NO.: 268082 LICENSE TYPE: A INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: LONDON COS. POLICY NO. : CB34610 POLICY EXP. DAT°: 1 /01/94 ENGINEER CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS I.IliUE.11 ' 9- 944 -4124 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 4/22/94 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 10 /01/94 PERMIT ISSUED BY ------------------------- - PERMIT IL'L'S (Y DEPOSIT _______ _ _ ____ __ _---------- 1. APPLICATION FEE 120.00 Security Deposit is Damage Deposit assign( 2. INSPECT1ION DEPOSIT. .00 to 3460TE. 3. ADDL. INSPECTION .00 4. SECURITY DEPOSIT •00 --- ---------------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK Change #l: El Portal St N to be completely restored, City fence to be replaced USE OF EL PORTAL ST NORTH WEST OF NEPTUNE, AV AS STAGING AREA PER ACCESS PLAN, BARRIER PLAN & EQUIPMENT LIST RECEIVED 12- 8 -93. USE OF THIS SITE FOR ANY OTHER JOB MUST BE PRE - APPROVED IN WRITING BY CITY ENGINEER. Change #2: No contact of the bluff shall be allowed. -- INSPECTION ----- -- --- - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- [Todd Baumbach] INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I UNDERSTAND THAT THA CITY OF ENCINITA:: UTILIZES A COST RECOVERY SYSTEM FOR PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION, AND THAT IF Pv'.J.:E. _ CCSTS EXCEED D'EPOS'ITS THE APPLICANT SHALL PAY THE OUTSTANDING BALANCE PRIOR TO RELEASE OF SECURITY. I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE 'COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HER=SY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTYAOF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. SIGNATURE 13 a8 I Re-rTl N PRINT NAME 0R CIE ON!: 1. OWNER ADEN 3. 00 Ll- ,I,z -fu DATE SIGNED (6o) vFT4-&2'1_ _ELE "VNE NUMBER' Encinitas allows sea wall to be built By Terry Wells Staff Writer ENCINITAS —The City Council will allow construction of the first in a series of long- discussed sea walls at night during the summer, apparently reviving a battle Sea wall >From Page B -1 a consultant working with Clayton and 14 other homeowners. But the decision came after protests from two members of Save Our Steps, the group that success-. fully fought a proposal to put beneath the bluffs piles of boulders large enough to resist being pulled into the water by high tides. "If they start allowing construc- tion on the beach in the summer, we're going to flood City Hall," said a frustrated Charles Moore, an SOS member. between bluff -top residents and beach users. In a 4-1 vote, with Councilwoman Maura Wiegand opposed, the coun- cil waived a city policy against beach construction between Memo- rial Day and Labor Day to allow a sea wall at the base of the bluff Gordy Pease, another SOS mem- ber, said he was concerned about the precedent of allowing the con- struction. "Construction on the beach during the summer months is going to restrict access to the beach," Pease said. "We use the beach then, and tourism is high." Councilman John Davis said the Clayton property was a special case, and urged his fellow council mem- bers to allow the construction. "I think we're all going to have to give a little bit and make allowances for people to help with their prob- lems," Davis said. Several council members said they were not setting a precedent for the other 15 parcels along Nep- beneath a house at 638 Neptune Ave. The homeowner, Charles Clay. ton, is one of 16 bluff -top owners seeking to build walls. In Clayton's case, the matter is urgent because the bluff beneath his home has already experienced a failure. tune Avenue. "This should not be precedent - setting — at least not from where 1 sit," said Mayor Gail Nano. W iegand, the lone dissenter, said she could not see the compelling reason for setting aside a popular city policy against summertime con- struction. "I think there are too The nighttime construction schedule is necessary because that is when the low tides occur, and when installing the concrete sea walls is possible. Work could begin as soon as Friday, said Bob Trettin, > See Sea wall, Page B -2 many unknown factors," she said. "Encinitas is a beach city, and we have a lot of beach problems." Trettin, who has been working for nearly two years to get state and local approval for the walls, said he took the council's altitude as dis- couraging for the remaining pro- jects. E STATE LANDS COMMISSION— 1807 13TH STREET SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 (TDD /TT) 1-800- 735-2929 (916) 44S -1012 March 16, 1993 File Ref.: SD 93 -03 -02.1 Bob Trettin The Trettin Company 12785 Amaranth Street San Diego CA 92129 Dear Mr, Trettin: SUBJECT: Bluff Stabilization. To Protect Existing Residence at 638 Neptune Avenue. Encinitas Staff of the State Lands Commission (SLC) has reviewed the material sent with your February 18, 1993 letter concerning the subject project. We understand that the Californio Coastal Commission has issued an emergency permit conditioned on our review. We have insufficient information to determine the location of the ordinary high water mark at this location as it would define the limit of State ownership. However, it appears from the material you provided that the stabilization will be located entirely on the bluff face and not on lands under the jurisdiction of the SLC. Therefore, SLC' authorization will not be required. The SLC does not have any provisions for issuance of emergencti permits Lt many instances we bave found that what are alleged to be emergencies are, in fact, conditions that have existed for a long period of time and for which no permit applications were submitted to the SLC in a timely fashion. While the SLC does not meet on a regularly monthly basis, mcetings occur often enough to be able to consider applications for these kinds of projects in a timely fashion. This letter does not constitute, nor shall it be construed as, a walver o; limitation of any right, title, or interest of the State of California in any lands under its jurisdiction. -2- March 16, 1993 if you have any questions, please contact Curtis L Fossum, Senior Staff Counsel, Southern California Region, at (916) 445 -7738. cc: Chuck Clayton 16167 E, Whittier Blvd. Whittier CA 90603 Lee McEachern, CCC /SD Bob Trettin Sincerely, JANE SEKEKY, Chief Division of Land Management -I- bcc: L, Fossum Jane Smt h / q SZ'li - 'IGOf March 16, 1993 ` EARTH SYSTEMS DESIGN GROUP "Specialists In Earth Retention Solutions" tq TTgl1 /A,15/7- tic It GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION CLAYTON SEA BLUFF 638 NEPTUNE AVENUE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: CHUCK CLAYTON 16167 E. WHITTIER BLVD. WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90603 OCTOBER 26, 1992 PREPARED BY: EARTH SYSTEMS DESIGN GROUP 1529 GRAND AVENUE SUITE A SAN MARCOS, CALIFORNIA 92069 1529 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE A • SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 • (619) 471 -6351 N.C.E.E. 04170 • U. R.C.E. SC-12096 • ARZ. R.C.E. 011971 • NEV. R.C.E. 03037 • WA. CF. 910776 - ._. _ -_.. .... _- ... ...- .. -._.. .- -.................. .......�.....�.rm�..n.�.rn...,n .u.es•.�ac•w•. tt.r�an..v e.. �nmc. ^. ->, .... .r•...r.� EARTH SYSTEN21S DESIGN GROUP "Speeialims let Earth Retention Solutions" October 26, 1992 Mr. Chuck Clayton 16167 E. Whittier Blvd Whitier, CA 90603 RE: Job #E0085 SUBJECT: Geotechnical and Geoloaieal Investigation Clayton Sea Eluff, 638 Neptune Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Dear Mr. Clayton: At your request Earth Systems Design Group has prepared a topographic map of your property extending from Neptune Avenue to the beach and has performed a geotechnical and geological investigation of the coastal bluff with respect to stability. Our findings and recommendations are presented herein. In summary, our observations and analysis indicates that the coastal bluff on your property is comprised of 2 geologic units each of which could cause a stability problem that may affect the safety and property value of your house. Additionally, these two units have been evaluated within the geotechnical report. If there are any questions or issues that need clarification, please feel free to contact this firm at any time in the future. Respectfully Submitted, EART SYSTEMS DESIGN ROU��.�� Eel TH SYSTEMS ESiGN GROUP Charles J. Randle =�: %. ='An' ew Farkas S~E President "- #1185 Q �"OA�� RCE #22096 "% m No. 1185 Comm mazo "v.; ��_ AS CR/ am OF C C,;.Ir0Nf.Ira 15' -9 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE A - SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 - C619) 471 -6351 N.C.E.E. a 170 -CA. R.C.E. RC22096 - AR2. R.C.E. 011971 -NEV. R.C.E. R3027 . wA. C.E.010776 INDEX 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 SCOPE 3.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 Site Description 3.2 Beach and Bluff Conditions 4.0 SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 4.1 Beach Deposits(Bd) 4.2 Quaternary Terrace Deposits (Qt) 4.3 Torrey Sandstone Formation (Tt) 4.4 Groundwater 5.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING 5.1 Regional Geologic Setting 5.2 Regional and Local Faulting 5.3 Seismicity 5.4 Liquefaction 5.5 Ground Failure 5.6 Sea Cliff Retreat 5.6.1 Stabilizing characteristics 5.6.2 Destabilizing Characteristics 5.7 Landsliding and Slope Stability 5.8 Cliff Stability and Erosion 5.9 Slope Stability Analysis 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Conclusions 6.2 Recommendations 1 i n 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 S s 9 Q 9 9 7.0 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND LIMITATIONS 11 APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION CLAYTON SEA BLUFF, 638 NEPTUNE AVENUE ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 1.0 INTRODUCTION In accordance with your request we have performed a geotechnical and geological investigation of the sea bluff located at 638 Neptune Avenue in the City or Encinitas, California (see Vicinity htap, Figure 1). The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the hazard(s) to existing structures on top of the bluff and provide recommendations for mitigation of the hazard(s). 2.0 SCOPE The scope of our investigation included the following tasks: * Review of the readily available published and unpublished reports and documents relative to the subject site (see References, Appendix A); * Geological reconnaissance and mapping of the site and sea bluff conditions; * Logging and sampling of the sea bluff face; * Laboratory analysis and testing of representative samples; * Engineering and Geologic analysis of field and laboratory data; Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions and recommendations regarding to site conditions and repair alternatives to mitigate the potential for damage to existing structures. Project No. E -0085 Page No. 2 3.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 Site Description The site is located at 638 Neptune Avenue in the City of Encinitas, California, consists of a generally square, lot bounded to the east by Neptune Avenue, north and south by single family residential structures and to the west by an approximately 05 feet high steeply westerly sloping sea bluff that descents onto a randomly placed rip -rap on a sandy beach. A single family residential structure consisting of a two story wood frame building, is located approximately 20 to 25 feet from the top edge of the sea bluff. Other improvements consist of a concrete and brick driveway, brick patio and planters. Jacuzzi and timber retaining system constructed on the natural bluff adjacent to the patio. The upper portion of the bluff is covered with vegetation consisting of shrubs, small trees and ice plant. 3.2 Beach and Bluff Conditions Some characteristic features such as jointed sandstone, seepage and sandstone blocks at the base of the bluff were observed during the investigation, that suggest an on -going erosion and bluff retreat. Additionally, erosion gullies were observed on the upper portion of the bluff possibly caused in part by exposure to precipitation, wind, landscape maintenance and loss of support from the lower portion of bluff. At zero tide, the water line of the Pacific Ocean is approximately 40 to 50 feet measured laterally from the base of the sea bluff. During periods of high tides ocean swells often impact the base of the bluff. This condition conducted to protect the sea bluff with a randomly placed rip -rap which acts as a wave energy dissipator.• The near -shore beach environment west of the site generally consists of gently westward sloping wave - cut shelf of moderately to highly resistant sandstone of the Eocene -aged Torrey Sandstone. These cemented sandstones were noted to be massive, fine to medium grained, and competent. This unit is visible as an outcrop exposed from beneath unconsolidated sand beach deposits and extend to form a 18 to 18.5 foot high near - vertical sea cliff at the base of the bluff. This unit presents water staining and seepage that extend from the base of the sea bluff to the contact with the upper terrace deposits. Project No. E -0085 Page No. 3 Unconformably overlying the Torrey Sandstone and generally extending from an elevation of 22 feet to the bluff top are Quaternary -aged marine terrace deposits consisting of moderately weathered and eroded sands and sandstones. These materials are slightly to moderately well cemented, massive, fine to medium- grained silty sand and sandstones which are naturally weathered into slopes ranging from approximately 1z to 1 (horizontal to vertical), to locally almost vertical in the lower portion. The area between the wooden retaining wall and about 12 to 14 feet above the contact with the Torrey Sandstone has been protected with vegetation consisting of ice - plant, shrubs and scattered trees. 4.0 SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS As part of our investigation. We have performed geologic mapping site reconnaissance and surface sampling on the face of the sea bluff (see Site Plan, and Cross - Section Figure 2 and 3. Sea Bluff Face Log Plates B -1, B -la). The samples obtained were tested in the laboratory for Direct Shear (method ASTM: D 3080). Tests results are presented in Appendix B. Soils encountered on -site during our investigation consisted of soil deposits, Quaternary -aged terrace deposits and the Eocene -aged Torrey Sandstone. A brief description of each of the soils and geolegic units encountered is provided below. 4.1 Beach Deposits (Bd) Beach deposits were encountered overlying Torrey Sandstone materials at the base of the sea bluff. These materials consist of loosely consolidated sand and gravel- cohble deposits. These deposits are subject to cyclic seasonal changes in type of material and degree of slope inclination as a response to changes in wave energy during the summer calm and winter storm conditions. In addition, these deposits are subject to an on -going transport as a result of wave and tidal action. In the vicinity of the base of the bluff, the beach deposits are estimated to range from 3 to 5 feet in thickness. 4.2 Quaternary Terrace Deposits (Qt) Quaternary -aged Terrace deposits are exposed in the bluff face above an approximate elevation of 22 to 22.5 feet and extend to the top of the slope. These deposits consist of poorly to moderately well consolidated and weakly cemented, Light gray to very light brown, orange- brown, brown and gray brown silty fine to medium sands and sandstones. These sands are generally massive to thin bedded. J Project No. E -0085 Page No. 4 No evidence that suggest, faulting, fracturing or jointing was found within these deposits. 4.2 Torrey Sandstone Formation (TO The Eocene -aged Torrey Sandstone is exposed on -site underlying the terrace deposits in the lower portion of the sea bluff from beneath the beach deposits to an elevation of approximately 22.0 to 22.5 feet in a near - vertical to vertical cliff. This formation consists generally of well consolidated. moderately to well cemented, massive and cross - bedded gray to light brown, yellow brown and red brown clayey fine to medium grained sandstone with occasional thin layers of claystone and siltstone. Several fractures and joints were observed within this unit on the subject site. These features dip 80 to 87 degrees to the east and west and strike in a northerly direction (see Site Plan, Figure 2). These fractures and joints combined with water seepage and weathering influence to a large extent the instability of the bluff. The rate of retreat of the terrace deposits is controlled largely by the rate of retreat of the Torrey Sandstone. Noted during our site reconnaissance were two fault traces within the Torrey Sandstone. one visible above the rip -rap directly below the subject property (see Site Plan, Figure 2), and a second fault trace below the adjacent property to the south. The fault trends are to the northeast with dips of approximately 74 degrees towards the east (north side up) and 64 degrees towards the east (south side up) respectively. These fault traces display apparent offsets of several inches. No displacement of the overlying terrace deposits was observed. Our review of the available references indicate the existence of several fault traces within this formation in the properties to the north and south. These faults were described as occurring within a fault zone presenting an overall strike in a north - northeasterly- direction, and dipping at angles of approximately 50 to 90 degrees to the east and west. No displacement of the overlying terrace deposits was reported. 4.4 Groundwater A relatively high moisture content was observed accumulated in the terrace deposits as perched water on the less permeable Torrey Sandstone, The origin of this water is most likely from landscape irrigation and other sources. Project No. E -0085 Page No. 5 In addition, the Torrey Sandstone present groundwater seepage that extend approximately from the contact with the terrace deposits to the base of the sea bluff (the approximate elevation of the base of the bluff is 3.8 to 4.0 feet) 5.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING 5.1 Resional Geologic SettinP The subject site is located in the Peninsular Range Province, of Southern California. The Peninsular Range Province is characterized by northwest trending mountain ranges separated by subparallel fault zones. The mountain ranges are underlain by basement rocks consisting of Jurassic metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks and Cretaceous igneous rocks of the Southern California Batholith. Later Cretaceous, Tertiary, and Quaternary sediments have been deposited to the west of mountain ranges. The upper Cretaceous, Tertiary and Quaternary rocks flanking the western margin of the mountains are generally comprised of detrital marine, lagoonal and non- marine sediments consisting of sandstones, mudstones and conglomerates. These sedimentary formations are generally flat -lying or dip gently to the northwest at the site. The Peninsular Range Province is traversed by several major active faults. The Elsinore and San Jacinto Faults are the major tectonic features. Both are strike -slip faults with predominantly right - lateral movements. The major tectonic activity appears to be a result of right- lateral movements on faults within the San Andreas Fault system. 5.2 P.ePional and Local Faulting The principal seismic considerations for improvements in the subject site are surface rupture of fault traces and damage caused by ground shaking or seismically- induced ground settlement. The potential for any or all of these hazards depends upon the recency of fault activity and proximity of the fault to the subject property. The possibility of damage due to ground rupture is considered unlikely since no active faults are known to cross the site and no evidence of active faulting was noted during our investigation. Review of geologic literature indicates that minor fault features have been mapped within the Torrey Sandstone Formation north and south of the site. Also, our site reconnaissance indicates the presence of a minor fault trace within the subject site (see Site Plan, Figure, 2). Project No. E -00 °5 Page Yo. 6 These features represent a general fault zone that extends for several hundred feet towards the north from below the northern adjacent property. Attitudes on faults mapped in this zone suooest an overall strike of north - northeast and dips of 50 to 90 degrees to the east and west. The nearest major active faults are the off -shore extension of the Rose Canyon Fault, the Elsinore Fault, and the off -shore Coronado Ranks Fault located approximately 4 to 10 miles west, 25 miles northeast and 15 to 20 southwest miles respectively. 5.3 Seismicitv The seismic hazard most likely to impact the site is ground shaking following a large earthquake on one of the major active regional faults. The Rose Canyon Fault is the most likely to affect the site with ground shaking should an earthquake occur on the fault. A maximum probable event on the Rose Canyon Fault could produce a peak horizontal acceleration of less than about 0.458 at the site. With respect to this hazard the site is comparable to others in this general area in similar geologic settings. 5.4 Liquefaction Liquefaction of soils can be caused by strong vibratory motion in response to earthquakes. Research and historical data indicate that loose near- saturated granular soils at depths shallower than about 100 feet are the most susceptible to liquefaction. It is our opinion that the on -site natural materials are not considered susceptible to liquefaction or sudden loss of soil strength. The unconsolidated beach sand deposits at the base of the bluff are generally susceptible to liquefaction. However, these shallow deposits (3 to 5 feet thick), are proposed to be removed in areas of repairs. 5.5 Cround Failure Failure within the upper portion of the bluff (terrace deposits) is a distinct possibility should a significant earthquake occur along the Rose Canyon Fault or other active faults in the Southern California Region. i.6 Sea Cliff Retreat A variety of factors may affect the rate of retreat of coastal sca cliffs composed of materials similar to those existing along the westerly project boundary. Project No. E -0085 Page No. 7 These factors include but are not limited to, the degree of induration of the sedimentary materials composing the sea bluff, frequency and intensity of wave and storm action, degree of orientation of fracturing, amount of uncontrolled drainage runoff from adjoining up -slope areas and other sources etc. Studies performed for similar bluffs and environments (Reference 1), have indicated that n conservative bluff retreat rate of 0.2 -0.3 feet per year. or 10 -15 feet in about 50 years may be applicable for the subject project This rate is supported by aerial photographic records. Given the poorly cemented nature of the terrace deposits, unprotected bluffs composed of this material may retreat relatively faster than protected bluffs or more cemented formations. It is important to mention that bluff retreat is episodic, site - specific and strongly related to meteorological conditions, geologic conditions and erosional agents. Field reconnaissance of the sea bluff in the subject site suggest the following stabilizing and destabilizing characteristics in the current condition: 5.6.1 Stabilizinz characteristics * The lower 22 feet of the sea cliff is composed of moderately cemented and competent Torrey Sandstone materials; * The Torrey Sandstone appears jointed and fractured only in localized areas on the subject site; Landscape and slope vegetation irrigation is localized and minimal. existing runoff from the building pads is directed away from slope areas. x° The lower portion of the sea bluff is somewhat protected from the direct wave action with energy dissipator (rip -rap) 5.6.2 Destabilizin m Characteristics * The number and degree of jointing and fracturing that occur in the areas presenting this condition; * The strike and steep dip angle of the joints and fractures or the Torrey Sandstone; Project No. E -0085 Page No. 8 x Erosion and undermining of the lower portion of the Torrey Sandstone by wave action, water seepage and weathering creating an unstable condition of the areas presenting jointing and fracturing. Failure of these materials could create a hazard condition to the beach -going public below and possibly result in loss or undermining of foundational soils from beneath the up -slope structures. The Torrey Sandstone typically fails in the form of large blocks that separate from the near - vertical cliff often leaving the overlying poorly cemented and poorly consolidated terrace deposits with no down -slope support thus creating a landslide condition and a hazard to the public down below and to the up -slope structures: The inadequacy of erosion protection either natural or artificial of the exposed portion of the sea bluff subject to weathering from the environment such climatic changes, rain runoff, water seepage, animal burrowing and from human activity such as up -slope landscape watering, non- planned construction. thus eroding and /or weakening the natural condition of the materials on the face of the sea bluff. 5.7 Landslidins and Slope Stability Based on our review of pertinent documents and our site reconnaissance there are no indications of deep seated landsliding on or adjacent to the subject site. However. several shallow slope failures are known to have occurred previously within the upper portion of the bluff. Studies performed by others (Reference Z), suggest that similar conditions were present on the nearby property to the south of the subject site at the time of their investigation. Our site observation. reconnaissance and present evidence of failures within the upper portion of the sea bluff in the subject site, suggest that these failures are related largely to loss of support caused by failures within the Torrey Sandstone. 5.8 Cliff Stability and Erosion Future sea bluff retreat at the subject site with the present conditions will largely depend on the rate of retreat of the Torrey Sandstone. Project No. E -0085 Page No. 9 It is our opinion that the erosion of the base of the sea cliff caused by wave action, water seepage, weathering and human activity, creates a constantly growing potential for slope instability. The potential for erosion and slope instability is considered high. 5.9 Slope Stability Analysis A slope stability analysis was performed on a typical section using test results from relatively undisturbed samples obtained on the face of the bluff (see Appendix B and Slope Stability Analysis, Appendix D). The analysis was performed using the STBL4 program, based on the simplified Janbu Method of Slices assuming a rotational type failure. The program calculates 100 potential failure surfaces using 10 origination and 10 termination points at the base and top of the section calculated respectively. The analysis shows a critical value of factor of safety ranging from 1.051 to 1.087 (see Slope Stability Analysis, Appendix D), which indicates that the slope is marginally stable and unless some method of stabilization is provided, continued erosion, weathering, fracturing and /or jointing may result in slope failure. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Conclusions Based on our investigation, it is our professional opinion that the slope failures occurred in the lower and upper portions of the sea bluff, present a continuing demonstrable hazard to the up -slope existing residential structure and improvements as well as to the beach -going public below. We therefore conclude that protection of the lower portion of the sea bluff and repair /protection of the upper portion will be required to reduce the sea bluff retreat as well as to mitigate the hazard that the present condition constitutes to the up -slope structures and the beach -going public. The initiating cause for the present state of slope condition, was in our opinion, the localized failures of the Torrey Sandstone caused by the conditions discussed previously. 6.2 Recommendations Based upon our investigation, we recommend that repairs to the subject bluff be performed immediately. It is our opinion that the base of the bluff requires protection to reduce additional erosion and loss of support to the bluff and soils above. Project No. E -0085 Page No. 10 We also consider that the existing vegetation is not sufficient to protect against surface failure. The following represent alternates to protect the base of the bluff, the upper portion of the bluff would be protected in the future if remedial work is deemed necessary. It is our opinion that the existing upper wall may not be adequate to protect the up slope residential structure and improvements from the hazards of a slope failure or to meet the requirements of some of our alternatives presented below. Alternative 1. Consists of a 30 foot high shotcrete seawall in line with the wall to the north. Backfill with drains would be placed behind the wall. The upper wall would be designed now, and constructed as soon as practical (See Figure 4). Alternative 2. Consists of a 20 foot high timber wall with a concrete energy absorber to elevation 7. Backfill and upper walls would be as in alternative 1. As a future alternative this system could be constructed with shotcrete (See Figure 5). Alternative 3. Consists of a 37 foot high concrete wall matching the abutting wall to the north. This higher wall would preclude the necessity for a future upper wall, as the slope above the wall will adequately serve to support the upper bluff (See Figure 6). Alternative 4. Consists of a timber wall 18 foot high. These vertical timbers would be set into a 5' deep concrete trench and wave energy would be dissipated with rip -rap 8 foot high in front of the wall (See Figure 7). In our opinion alternative 3 would provide the best protection to the bluff at the subject site arid it is the most appropriate design to match the existing neighboring structure. In addition, we consider that a well planned construction schedule is not likely to affect the stability of the adjacent properties. If construction is to be performed we recommend that the contractor provide this office with a work plan prior to the construction initiation for our review and approval. Project No. E -0085 Page No. 11 We recommend that a pre- construction meeting be held at the subject site with all the parties involved present, including homeowner(s), design engineer, soils engineer, and contractor(s) to answer and clarify all the questions that may arise from the report prior to construction. We also recommend that we are contacted to answer any questions concerning the subject project. 7.0 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND LIMITATIONS The recommendations provided in this report are based on our observations. The interpolated subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during construction by a representative of Earth Systems Design Group. We recommend that all foundation excavations and grading operations be observed by a representative of this firm so that construction is performed in accordance with the recommendations of this report. Final project drawings should also be reviewed by this office prior to construction. The recommendations contained in this report are based on our field study, laboratory tests, and our understanding of the proposed construction. If any soil conditions are encountered at the site which are different from those assumed in the preparation of this report, our firm should be immediately notified so that we may review the situation and make supplementary recommendations. In addition, if the scope of the proposed structure changes from that described in this report, our firm should also be notified. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices within the City of Encinitas area. Professional judgments presented herein are based partly on our evaluations of the technical information gathered, partly on our understanding of the proposed construction, and partly on our general experience in the geotechnical field. Our engineering work and judgments rendered meet current professional standards. We do not direct the contractor's operations, and we cannot be responsible for the safety of other than our own personnel on the site; therefore, the safety of others is the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor should notify the owner if he considers any of the recommended actions presented herein to be unsafe. APPENDI`{ A REFEHENCES 1. Artim, E.R., 1955, "Erosion and Retreat of Sea Cliffs, San Diego County ", published research excerpt from California's Battered Coast, Proceedings from a Conference on Coastal Erosion, San Diego, California ", edited by Jim Mcgrath, dated September, 1985. =. "Preliminary Geotechnical Excavation, Bradley Residence, Lot Adjacent to 560 Neptune Avenue, Leucadla, California ", prepared by Buchanan - Rahilly, Inc., dated October 27, 1986 3. "Geotechnical and Geological Study, Bradley Property 560 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, California ", prepared by Owen Consultants, dated June 30, 1989. 4. Eisenberg, L.I., 1983, "Pleistocene Marine Terrace and Eocene Geology; Encinitas, and Rancho Santa Fe Quadrangles, San Diego County, California ", Master of Science Thesis, SDSU, dated September 20, 1983. 5. Weber, F.H., 1982, "Recent Slope Failures, Ancient Landslides, and related Geology of the North- Central Coastal Area, San Diego County, California ", CDMG Open File Report 92 -12 LA, dated July 1, 19S2. 6. Abbot, P.L.,(Editor) 1985, "On the Manner of Deposition of the Eocene Strata in the Northern San Diego County, California, ", San Diego Association of Geologists Publication, dated April 13, 1955. Tan, S.S., 1956, "Landslide Hazards in the Encinitas Quadrangle, San Diego County, California ", California Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report. S. Kuhn, G.G. and F.P. Shepard, 1953, "Coastal Erosion in San Diego County, California ", in Guidebook to Selected Geologic Features, /A Coastal Area of Southern San Diego County, SDAGEG October, 1953, G.T. Farrand Editor. S. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1994, Shore Protection Manual, Volumens I and II. 10. Kuhn, G.G. and F.P. Shepard, 1944, "Sea Cliffs, Beaches and Coastal Valleys of San Diego, California ", Univ. Calif. Press. 11. Kern, K.P.., 1993, "Earthquakes and Faults in San Diego:, Pickle Press, San Diego California. 12. Ziony, J.I., Wentworth, C.M., Buchanan- Ranks, J.Y. and H.C. Wagner, 197.1, "Preliminary Nap Showing Recency of Faulting in Coastal Southern California ", U.S. Geological Survey Map M.° -595, Scale: 1:250,000. 13. "County of San Diego Topographic Survey, Sheet 3:6 -1677, scale: 1 Inch equals 200 feet, dated September 17, 1975 ". 14. "Earth Systcros Design Topographic Survey, scale: 1 Inch equals- 40 feet, dated June 1992". 15. "Earth Systems Desl ;n Group aerial photographs scale 1 Inch equals 300' flown June 3, 1992". 16. "Geotechnical and 'Geologic Investigation Neptune 11 Project, 470 through 554 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, California ", prepared by Earth Systems Design Group, November, 1992. i SUNCI I I' 400 CL4bCU; N rI i r m HN z ' may' SpN Po N ; 0 0 51I Ilc�l� .1 i ? s I ,105: � � n cA < OL I i OE ''., ��, 521 5 BRITTANY AV Y �`. IANA T Y SZ 2 W O N N J`4 /_Elj EEEnLN o o vm �. 00 o. > " -+ a u •', I CAD' a�. I •' -_ orA � LEUCADIA O P Z LAI. IJ B� DA o aM °. (E "fJ� I N T �� NION a ST UNION au' ENCINITAS BEACI�I W p COUNTY PARK I r ❑ IUNIDN I H LCYON d ST RD Wy Q SPA- $ ¢ nlwso I m rr . G N EY- M M = O .�Z. - -- — vi — SEAS70E ARDENS COUNT PARKS. ' S AO L°a MP pH� SP .'L cl SFLORIS► S� O GA60ENS� �p5b LOLITA S ST O o S�U� \A r� p $ �a os -- o -- a B S9 1 ENCIAI� J r •� q MOONLIGHT L^ i' S O I STATE BEACH:! s I O` w IQp ST O � o Fs c �— rte--.— v . c7iarn s),srr•.Ais Orslcly GROUT' 1479 n Lnn.l nr.no!, Sn.. Ym em, ln1 Jn•n.n 9760 r1.nn. (a191 u1 F ",I In• IM11n1 .111. ri;) TOwG hin fiSHtift Dw� PPOJECi E0085 FIC. 1 VICINITY MAP koLA Y 1 LJH nL . II�•LI ` fag NEPTUNE AVE. ENCINITAS. CA. I- c o r ' i .. y Ell) � o < < F �I O Z ? Z O u? n e A V - o n TT�I m � � �wuo [ 'r a S u Z �) z m m G D 111 11,1 r Z > M gym/ C7 D u O 1 •c s.a�..�r •. TI 0 a v I ATTITUDE OF .)OIPIT e:\ APO /OR FRACTURE 1 LOCAT ION OF LJ11 CROSS SECT 1011 _w— ,Kj -'E 1992 OPOCRAPHIC C0NTOUR _ ATIITUOE OF T- BE AR IPIC SEEPAGE / )`4 18q . � .may I .. � J FAULT �Itj�Jrl Tt t AuCu PIUCUSf I 1 y IZ � I II 1 `- � I1 it 0.4 r _S 1 87- _ 7 �'- TEeP. RAPOUII PLACED RIPRAP TURD 1991 � I 0 SC�Lf 1 "; 1 1 a o� a > - Q ti N 1'1 y tr 1 � 0 o y s n A O p ' n Z .i a ? C7 a -z A V O .Z7 N M1 S � tT co Z m 0 H z Z m D m m z n Z D n D n ^ l ) 0 z m rp rn � m9 LEGEND Bd = BEACH SAND DEPOSITS Tt = TERTIARY TORREY SANDSTONE Ot = QUATERNARY TERRACE DEPOSITS ? —? = GEOLOGIC CONTACT () WHERE UIICERTAIII) •'✓ = WATER SEEPAGE 5 -5 = SAMPLE LOCATION 100 ------ --- ------------------ _-- - - - - - - _- ----------------------------- / AIL 70 ------------------------- - i -------------------------------------- / i - - - »L: « i i S -4 _ ----------------------------------------- S -5 7--- - - - -Qt m o o— -------- ___ •_- ««.a.. Tt ----------------------------------------------- PROFILE SECTION A- A .«. , , wo w •••w ----------------------------------------------------- ""•' ". . oyn ------------------------ ---- ---------- -- --- --- --- -- - --- II f I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 t I I I I I 1 I I I W J I I I I 1 I I I i I Z J I t l r I I I I I I I 1 0Ji 1 I I I I I I I 1 < 1 w# C I I I I I I I I I > I e I I I — I" sis I I I I I I Opl 1 Z w W y I 1 V I�Q I 1 I 1 I I ZW' x I J u I Q 1 1 \ I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I �� I�• I 1 I I I 1 I I I � I •I � 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 * 1 �• I 1 I I I I 1 I I i t I � �• I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I �•I ', I I I I I I I I 1 I I � �• 1 I I I i I 1 I 1 1 .I I� • 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I h 670— I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I r ^�• I � 1 I 1 1 1 I p< a 1 IL 1 I t I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I y 1 I I u`.:i I O $ b N f n N O^ O ,CARTH SYSTEA15 DESICN CROUP IS29 • Gamma A�,�.,. So. MWCGf. C01 OWP -49NAA PNnn1 (6191 471 -6:51 in. (M119) 471 -7573 DATE 10-09-92 2 W"* N11 PPOJECT E0085 17EVISION FIG. 4 ALTERIIIATIVE CLA 170 9 RESIDENCE 635 NEPTUNE AVE ENCINITAS, CA. J. I j i xy I �T �`;- V , I+ o i�- Ca 0 I: D z r1 Z n ZM Aar— ti of 111 x0 m I � I a X71 I V, iES -0CKE ---------- ------ ------ ce- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - sr oat lu3i4 ALL z - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ - _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ` C[ISi;aC flr9Fi ..- ffOr- u+:A�l ____________ 7p - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V --- -- -- 60 -------------------------------------- ZOSY wO b SE.._ 'PCJ ^k'D a,Ct .s0 GP+OC At �/ WArME.lt . ti, 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i -- - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I 40 - - - - - - - - - -- -- --- - - - 30 -------- LI �- - - - -_/ _ _______ - -- _________________________________- I ICP a S.n0Sr0uE 20 --- - -- -- I I --- -1 -� -- — — — — — - rosI r--% -.(M An e. r9sx ST )�, 199$ awm ALTERNATIVE TWO MIB(fl r .00051 rut TIMBER, TOP WALL 10 --- - - - -- -- i TIMBER LOWER WALL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 I I Vi I Z'5 1 VR I V I � � 1 I N ' I 1 I 1,1 1 1 � I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I . I 1 I t t I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I O O S� Nm co I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I -I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I fs g EARTH SYSTEMS DESiv-IV CROUP 1:29 A C+ona +en°., Son mwcoa. Cal . lo•n -a 92059 IMant (619) 471.6351 1'a• (619) 01_7572 OATE 10 -09 -92 DWC- NO AITERN O9I PPOJECT. E0085 REVISION 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I . I 1 I I O a I 081 I Y.aa I I 1 I I I I I I I I I O i i I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I t 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I i I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I t 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I N 1 1 - 1 I 1 I 1 •�. I AIL. I -•j I I I I I I I W W 2 W O e Q Y z�x Ljj H J V Q I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I � gSl I N. I I I I I ' yI I '1 I I 1 I I 1 �I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I �j I I II I I ■ I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 FIG AL1fEERNATiVE 3 CLAYTON RESIDENCE 638 NEPTUNE AVE. ENCINITAS. CA. 2 a i III, JJ v I I 1 I 1 /I I I I i 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I i I i 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I °o I� Im IY I` I I I I, I\ YI � I I i I JI .1 JI i \ I � I I• I � I \ S N 9 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I .I I I \ S yy� S I t Q' I V I � J I a I W � I a 1 F- O Q I Z W 1 � m W� I J I Q I I \I I I \\ I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I I I t 1 I I I I I � I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P a0 n b N e n N EARTH SYSTEMS DESIGN CROUP 1•.'.9 ♦ dono Av .e. Son I ,cas. Coyle.. -o 921F9 anew. (619) 411.6.,151 Fa. (619) 471-75 %7 OATE 10 -09 -92 Ow0 NO AUEFrI Ow PFO.IECT E0035 I1EVI$ION C I I � I I I I I a.l IC mul Iv �' °'I lyc I li's I I 0 0 F[G. 7 ALTERNATIVE 'v" CLA�7ON RESIDENCE 533 NEPTUNE AVE. ENCINITA$. CA. I I I i i I 1 1 I 6 is I• I a � �e �_ I •I I \VI I ���Y I I I I[- I I t 1 I I I \I I I \\ I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I I I t 1 I I I I I � I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P a0 n b N e n N EARTH SYSTEMS DESIGN CROUP 1•.'.9 ♦ dono Av .e. Son I ,cas. Coyle.. -o 921F9 anew. (619) 411.6.,151 Fa. (619) 471-75 %7 OATE 10 -09 -92 Ow0 NO AUEFrI Ow PFO.IECT E0035 I1EVI$ION C I I � I I I I I a.l IC mul Iv �' °'I lyc I li's I I 0 0 F[G. 7 ALTERNATIVE 'v" CLA�7ON RESIDENCE 533 NEPTUNE AVE. ENCINITA$. CA. EARTH SYSTEMS DESIGN GROUP 13h, in(: n71�G3'il �nf'axrtGl9iCn71� %5722069 SSA J3L•'J1'3'' FACE: Ilnil. 1.111:; 1 =VI :II IIIIID UI' DRILLING NA GI_C VATIIJN 97.5 WORK ORDCR NO. F -n085 I.IIGGI :II liv_gGE_._.------- C'Rf1UN11 —� L, i I1-SC ,IP I i0N r1ND REMAf�'ICS N , , �, ;.I 2 U i I I I I I U *_lU ft. TIMBER RETAINING WALL - S- -I I @ 10.0 ft. QUATERNARY TERRACE DEPOSITS(Qt.): -10 light brown to tan and reddish brow SM silty sand, fine to medium grained, - - moist, medium dense with thin layer of reddish brown silty sandstone cemented in iron oxide, moderately _._ to well indurated, massive to thin bedded. -'LU --'15 - 30 - I I I I I I @ 20.0 ft. Becomes slightly silty sand,damp to moist, friable, poorly indurated. --�t5- @ 38.0 ft. Becomes light brown to tan sand, to medium grained, loose. -CU-" -45_ - 5U- -45-- PLATE B-1 E -ARTH S'YSTEAIIS DESIGN GROUP iGl'I or,cC(619) 471n6,1:.i1Snn nx �619)Co1�1- 7S7c'920G9 51:A l;L•J1-' NO _ RF— 1 11AIL 1113',) PVLU y_1@- 92_..._ —.MI_I L1U Ui DRILLING N° LOGGED 0Y- HGE_ - -_.. f,NLIUND ELCVATION37 S f* WORK ORDER NO. F -nOxS 4 IICSCRIPTION AND REMARKS N J @ 60.0 ft. Thin layers of dark gray to black 1U -- sand. -65 @ 73.0 ft. Becomes red brown to light brown slightly silty sand, fine to coarse grained, friable, poorly indurated, 7U— very moist. 74.0 ft. Becomes very moist to wet. _ SM TORREY SANDSTONE (Tt)- Light gray to light gray brown, -yU slightly clayey silty sand, fine to medium grained, very wet to -- saturated, very dense, moderately B5_ well to well indurated, massive, water seeps , joints and fractures striking in a northerly direction, with dips of 80 to 84 degrees 90— towards the west. The surface is covered with algae type organics. SM --�5 @ 93.5 ft. BEACH SAND DEPOSITS: Gray brown to dark gray brown sand, fine to medius grained, wet, moderately dense, unconsolidated. —TVU" @ 94.0 ft. END OF LOG. PLATE P -1, S} -STEMS DESIGN GROUP EA R, TH , A r,,-, AvF mie, San Morcos. CokForn.o 92069 Phone %[,)i '171-6351 rox (619) 471-7572 U Ik' L TEST RESULTS zk� •i n .... .. . A .3.0 rt rA n 3.fl d.0 5.0 6-0 NUPMAL PRESURE (PSr) symput- SAMI'Ll 1.(JrATlrlll 5-4 @ 781 CI]III:SION (psF) 1600 PSY FRICTION ANGLE REMARKS 45.50 s-5 @ 87' 1075 psF 40.50 x A ran )1 1 1 "11 E-UUB5 yton Residence a rm ;n '1 DESIGN GROUP A i,, m l Avrl,11c. :,,i, hlnrl r,r•, (nl,l Orn10 9�OL� I'luu, /• ,I,I�1� d/I ,, i'.�I I n,, t(.I "1 /I /I-� /. } /G' I III. • I I I . I 1 .. (\ I ._` .� ..- - -• -� -I_ u L •'n '. 1111�1 II 0 x I A nu Euu85 w -,A111,11 I III AI IIIII T7 - S1 @ 10' and S2 @ 20' S1 @ 42' IIIIF'MAI .. ... _. _fRICTILIN .11111 -(:II III (I•sl i ANGLC C'1 U 14.5" 50U I 21.5" Clayton Residence �- — RCMARK-, APPENDIX C GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES I. GENERAL These guidelines present general procedures and requirements for grading and earthwork including preparation of areas to be filled, placement of fill, installation of subdrains, and excavations. The recommendations contained in the geotechnical report are a part of the earthwork and grading specifications and should supersede the provisions contained herein in the case of conflict. Evaluations performed by the consultant during the course of grading may result in new rrcommendat.ions which could supersede these specifications or the recommendations of the geotcchnical report. II. EARTHWORK OBSERVATION AND TESTING Prior to commencement of grading, a qualified geotechinical consultant should be employed for the purpose of observing earthwork procedures and testing the fills for conformance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report and these specifications. The consultant Is to provide adequate testing and observation so that he may determine that the work was accomplished as specified. It should be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the consultant and keep him apprised of work .schedules and changes so that the consultant may schedule his personnel accordingly. The contractor is to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish l.he work in accordance with applicable grading codes nr agency ordinances, these specifications, and the approved grading plans. If In the opinion of the consultant, unsatisfactory conditions arc resulting in a quality of work Irss than requlred in these specifications, the consultant may rrjrct the work and recommend that construction be stopped until the conditions arc rectified. Maximum dry density tests used to determine the degree of compaction should be performed In accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials Test Method ASTM: D 1557 -75. iTI. PREPARATION OF AREAS TO BE FILLED 1. Clcaring and Grubbing: All brush, vegetation, and debris slinuld hr removed and otherwise disposed of. Z. Proce.sslne: The existing ground which is evaluated to be satisfactory for suppnrt of fill should be scarified to a minlmum depth of G Inches. Existing ground which is not satisfactory should be overexcavated as specified In the following section. Scarification should continue until the soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or rinds and until the working surface is reasonably uniform and fren of unrven features which would Inhibit uniform compaction. 3. OvPrexcavatlon: Soft, dry, spongy, or otherwise unsuitable ground, extending to such a depth that surface processing cannot adequately improve the condition, should be overexcavated down to firm ground, approved by the consultant. 4. Moisture Conditioninz: Overexcavated and processed soils should be watered, dried -back, blended, and /or mixed, as necessary to attain a uniform moisture content near optimum. 5. Recompactlon: Overpxcavated and processed soils which have been properly mixed and moisture - conditioned should be recompacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent. G. Benchinz: Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical units), the ground should be benched. The lowest bench should be a minimum of 15 feet wide, and at least 2 feet deep, expose firm material, and be approved by the consultant. Other bunches should be excavated in firm material for a minimum width of 4 feet. Ground sloping flatter than 5:1 should be benched or otherwise overexcavated when considered necessary by the consultant. 7. Annroval: All areas to receive fill, including processed areas, removal areas, and toe -of -fill benches should be approved by the consultant prior to fill placement. IV. rlI.L MATERIAL 1. Cpnera : Material to be placed as fill should be free of organic matter and other deleterious substances, and should be approved by the consultant. Soils of poor gradation, expansion, or strength characteristics should be placed in areas designated by the consultant or mixed with other sills until suitable to serve as satisfactory fill material. _. Oversize: Oversize material defined as rock, or other Irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 12 inches, should not be burled or placed In fill, unless the location, materials, and disposal methods are specifically approved by the consultant. Oversize disposal operations should be such that nesting of nver.atzP material does not occur, and such that the oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densifled fill. Oversize material should not be placed within 10 feet vertically of finish grade or within the range of future. utilities or underground construction, unless specifically approved by the consultant. Import: . if Importing of fill material is necessary for grading, the import material should be approved by the gpotechnical consultant. V. FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION 1. Fill Lifts: Approved fill material should be placed In areas prepared to receive fill In near - horizontal layers not exceeding 0 Inches in compacted thickness. The consultant may approve thicker lifts if testing indicates the grading procedures are such that adequate compaction is being achieved with lifts of greater thickness. Each layer shall be spread evenly and should be thoroughly mixed during spreading to attain uniformity of material and moisture in each layer. 2. Fill Molsture: Fill layers at a moisture content less than optimum should be watered and mixed, and wet fill layers should be aerated by scarification or blended with drier material. loisture- conditioning and mixing of fill layers should continue until the fill material is at a uniform moisture content at or near optimum. 3. Compaction of Fill: After each layer has been evenly spread, moisture - conditioned, and mixed, It should be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density. Compaction equipment should be adequately sized and either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability, to efficiently achieve the specified degree of compaction. 4. Fill Slopes: Compacting of slopes should be accomplished, in addition to normal compacting procedures, by backrolling of slopes with sheepstoot rollers at frequent increments of 2 to 3 feet In fill elevation gain, or by other methods producing satisfactory results. At the rompl.etIon of grading, the- relative compaction of the slope nut to the slope face shall be at least 90 percent. Comrnrtlon Testlnz: Field tests to check the fill moisture and degrrc of compaction will be performed by the consultant. The location and frequency of tests should be at the consultant's discretion. In general, the tpsl n should be taken at an Interval not exceeding '. feet In vertical rise and /or 1,000 cubic yards of embankment. V1. SUgORAININSTALLATION Subdrain systems, if required, should be installed In approved ground to conform to the approximate alignment and details shown on the plans or as shown herein. The subdrain location or materials should not be changed or modified without the approval of the consultant. The consultant, however, may recommend and upon approval, direct changes In subdrain line, grade, or material. All subdrains should be surveyed for line and grade after installation and sufficient time allowed for the surveys, prior to commencement of filling over the subdrains. VII. EXCAVATION Excavations and cut slopes should be examined during grading. If directed by the consultant, further excavation or overexcavation and refilling of cut areas should be performed, and /or remedial grading of cut slopes performed. Where fill - over -cut slopes are to be graded, unless otherwise approved, the cut portion of the slope should be made and approved by the consultant prior to placement of materials for construction of the fill portion of the slope. V 1� �a 0 to y o� � U1 a of s� no n o O �b (1) m �i D D 1 EXISTING 'RESIDENCE 100f-- 1--- f-- I--- E• --F--- F---F---r--r-- I---ITI'fB. oaf 1111 110 ;980•=7= n---1--�--- --j- -� I'" I I t t I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I ,•( I _ I _'pl. 31.15' 1 1 1 1 1 so f-- r--f--f-- (--- 1--- I..- . -r--I- I- - -, -- I;' -I- 1- 7 1- ap�j--1- -•1-- -I- -� - -� 11..1.1 PCI I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 (I 2,81)1 ��I-- J -� -1— — _l- ♦- .J-- d-- l- .>- 1 - -1.. 1_ b f - - f - -I - -( - -) - -I - -f- - -,- - -1 - f —ii--� --I-; 1- -1 -- r - :• 1__ 1__ 1__ I__ )-- 1 20 I I I t I I I I I _Fr _ �_ • •I ,h ' I I I_ I I I I __1- -_1 I I- I_,!_I I �I�_ _ so f - -f f I f-- fTmisr.$)1• i - -1 -- I `i -'- I I- -j - --j - I-- -1 - --I -- i - -� 1 I 1 I 1 I I ,' I 1 ,�" 1'1'•'1 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 •( 1 ,I'� 1, ' I I I C - LOO Pit I I I I 1 I 1 '1 I 1 g - 105 pd1 I I I I I 1 1 .o L--L- -I--- (-- t- -I---1 I _ ,Y -1- - -- 1-- -1------ J- -J--�-- J--�- -�--.I I I 1 I 1 T1 IfS�,'iiI' I- \\-F I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I AX.URE I SURF I<CE I I I I I I 1 1 L------ I--- L;_L_st -- -- 1--- 1--- I--- I--- I--- 1---- J-- J--- -�--- I- -� - -� of I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I `10.231) I I I I I• I I It I I 1 01. 10.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I CIS 11 psiI I I I I I I 1 1 1° L- -t•-- L--L_.41�05L10j-L --L -- 1---1---1--iY1'7 pCf J-- J-- J--J-- J-- J-- J--J - -� I EXISCRIP RAP I I 11, I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 ° E- -L- _-L -- L-- L-- L-- L-- L-- L-- 1--- I-- -1- --1--J--J- -J--J-- J-- J---1--J - - J O to 20 M 40 50 60 m 00 Sb 100 110 110 1" 140 150 160 120 1b 100 200 110 MID LOT PROFILE SCALE; 1 "= 30' LEGEI4D OL Quaternary Terrace Deposits SEISMIC COEF. 0 .15 .25 Tt Tertiary Torrey Sandstone FACTOR OF - 1.020 .753 .665 -9-9- Geologic Contnct SAFETY (Queried where uniertuin) L` CPn.IL CLAY: �:!HNEPTUNE LOWER -FL JE ==LOPED ,�4' AND- St4ALt: -kL- E- -gT- -eRE- AK -OF- SLOPE' 7 ; 47. 38. 70. 57.5 2 70. 57.5 102. 81. 2 102. 81. 125. 98. 1 126. 98. 140. 98. 1 140. 98. 200. 98. 1 102. 81. 200. 81. 2 SOIL 113.1 113.1 0. 34.5 0. 0. 1 105. 105. 500. 21.5 0. 0. 2 EOUAK,E .0 .0 .0 CIRCLE 10 10 42. 47. 135. 165. 2. 14. 30. 0. PROFT_L CLAY2 638NEOTUNE CLAYTON 7 6 42. 23. 47. 38. 2 d7. 38. 70. 57.5 2 70. 57.5 102. 81. 10=' . 81. 126. 98. 1 126. 99. 140. 98. 1 140. 93. 200. u8. 1 102. 81. 200. 81. 2 SOIL 2 113.1 113.1 0. 34.5 0. 0. 1 105. 105. 500. 21.5 0. 0. 2 E91 iAK? .0 .0 .� CIRCLE 10 10 d2. 47. 115. 165. 2. 14. 10. 0. F5 * XSSS* SYSYYZSSYYYSY *YY *YSYSSSSSZS * * * * * *SSXYYXS* * YY* YYY* SSZSYYYZSZSYSYYZSSZSSSSSXZXZXSSZXYYX S * Z * * X 'k Design Professionals Management Systems * * Kirkland. Washington S * Y X Y* --------- -------- - - - - -- Y * X STASL4 Slooe Stability * X < * ----------------------- Y * * Y * * IBM PC 8 8086/8088 MS -DOS Version * * Revision 4.1 - 03/03/86 Y * * Y Y XXYYYYYYYYY* XYY *YYX * *Y *YYXYXYX * * * * * *YY * * *YY * * * *XYYYYYY YYY*** Y * * * * * * * *YY * * * * * # *YYYXX * * * * * * ** - -SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS- - SIMPLIFIED JANBU METHOD OF SLICES OR SIMPLIFIEn BISHOP METHOD PROBi_EM DESCRIPTION CLAY2 638NEPTUNE CLAYTON 130VNnARY COORDTNATES 6 TOP BOUNDARIES 7 TOTAL BOUNDARIES BOUNDARY X -LEFT Y -LEFT X -FIGHT Y -RIGHT SOIL TYPE NO •(FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) BELOW BND 1 42.00 23.00 47.00 38.00 2 47.00 38.00 70.00 57.50 2 ? 70.00 57.50 102.00 81.00 2 1 ^`.00 el .0() 126.00 98.00 1 126 no q?.00 140.00 98.00 1 140.00 ':�?.00 200.00 98.00 1 - 102.00 81.00 200.00 81.00 2 ISOTROPIC SOIL PARAMETERS 2 TYPE(S) OF SOIL A HORIZONTAL EARTHQUAKE LOADING COEFFICIENT OFO.000 HAS BEEN ASSIGNED A VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE LOADING COEFFICIENT OFO.000 HAS BEEN ASSIGNED CAVITATION PRESSURE = 0.0 PSF SOIL TOTAL SATURATED COHESION FRICTION PORE PRESSURE PI. OMETRIf' TYPE UNIT WT. UNIT WT. INTERCEPT ANGLE PRESSURE CONSTANT PACE N0. PCF) (PCF) (PSF) (DEG) PARAMETER (PSF) NO . 1 113.1 113.1 0.0 34.5 0.00 0.0 1 2 105.0 105.0 500.0 21.5 0.00 0.0 2 A HORIZONTAL EARTHQUAKE LOADING COEFFICIENT OFO.000 HAS BEEN ASSIGNED A VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE LOADING COEFFICIENT OFO.000 HAS BEEN ASSIGNED CAVITATION PRESSURE = 0.0 PSF Y A CRITICAL FAILURE SURFACE SEARCHING METHOD, USING A RANDOM TECHNIQUE FOR GENERATING, CIRCULAR SURFACES. HAS BEEN SPECIFIED. 100 TRIAL SURFACES HAVE BEEN GENERATED. 10 SURFACES INITIATE FROM EACH OF 10 POINTS EQUALLY SPACED ALONG THE ,ROUND SURFACE BETWEEN X = 42.00 FT. AND X = 47.00 FT. EACH tii.IRFACE TERMINATES BETWEEN X = 135.00 FT. AND X = 165.00 FT. UNLESS FARTHER LIMITATIONS WERE IMPOSED, THE MINIMUM ELEVATION AT WHTCH A SURFACE EXTENDS IS Y = 2.00 FT. 14.00 FT. LINE SEGMENTS DEFINE EACH TRIAL FAILURE SURFACE. RESTRICTIONS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED UPON THE ANGLE OF INITIATION. THE ANGLE HAS BEEN RESTRICTED BETWEEN THE ANGLES OF 0.0 AND 30.0 DE FOLLOWING ARE DISPLAYED THE TEN MOST CRITICAL OF THE TRIAL FAILURE 51JRFACF_S EXAMINED. THEY ARE ORDERED - MOST CRITICAL FIRST. It * * SAFETY FACTORS PIRE CALCULATED BY THE MODIFIED JANBU METHOD * * FAILURE SURFACE SPECIFIED BY 11 COORDINATE POINTS POINT X -SURF Y -SURF NO. (FT) (FT) 1 42.55 24.67 2 56.45 26.42 3 70.05 29.75 4 83.18 34.59 5 95.68 40.90 6 107.38 48.59 7 118.13 57.56 8 127.79 67.69 Q 136.23 78.86 10 143.36 90.91 1.1 145.52 9x.00 1.020 * ** FAILURE SURFACE SPECIFIED BY 12 COORDINATE POINTS • POINT X -SURF Y -SURF N0. (FT) (FT) 1 42.00 23.00 2 55.83 25.20 3 69.38 2 9.69 4 82.55 11.46 5 95.20 3Q.45 7 118.52 61,89 s� 179 . :.p Aa .20 1 {9.51 74 .4,5 147.'1? iiS q - j i . ..Ad Z,7 .44 12 1c..4.71. °x.00 EAW3 1.02H *'r* Y FAILURE SURFACE SPECIFIED BY 11 COORDINATE_ POINTS POINT X -(:•URF Y -SURF NO. (FT) (FT) 1 43.56 24.67 2 56.49 26.05 3 70.17 29.02 4 83.43 33.52 5 96.08 39.51 6 107.97 46.90 7 118.94 55.60 8 128.85 65.49 9 137.56 76.45 10 144.97 88.33 11 149.56 98.00 * ** 1.031 * ** FAILURE SURFACE SPECIFIED BY 12 COORDINATE POINTS POINT X -SURF Y -SURF NO. (FT) (FT) 1 42.00 2 3•.00 2 55.89 24.77 ? 69.54 27.90 4 82.81 :'2.34 5 95.5? 38.06 6 107.74 45.01 7 119.15 53.11 8 129.73 62.29 9 139.35 72.47 10 147.92 83.53 11 155.38 95.38 12 156.68 98.00 * ** I O- ?R * ** FAILURE SURFACE SPECIFIED BY 10 COORDINATE POINTS POINT X -SURF Y -51-ORF NQ. (FT) (FT) 1 43.67 28.00 2 57.56 211.70 3 71.12 33.19 4 84.11 :8.41 5 96.32 45.27 6 107.53 53.65 7 117.56 63.42 8 126.23 74.41 11 133.41 86.43 10 138.41 98.00 * ** 1.042* FAILURE SURFACE SPECIFIED BY 12 COORDINATE POINTS POINT X -SIIRF Y -SURF N0. (FT) (FT) 1 42.00 2 ?.00 ^_ 55.85 25.04 3 69.45 29.35 4 82.70 32.89 5 95.47 38.63 6 107.65 4 °:.52 7 119.16 `_3.50 8 1211.89 6• -.50 c 139.73 72.46 In 148.62 8: ".27 11 156.48 94.85 12 158.21 98.00 *** 1.043 * ** t FAILURE SURFACE SPECIFIED BY 11 COORDINATE POINTS POINT X -SURF Y -SURF NO. (FT) (FT) 1 42.00 23.00 2 55.30 27.38 3 68.31 32.55 4 80.98 39.50 5 93.28 45.18 6 105.16 52.60 7 116.57 60.71 8 127.48 69.49 9 137.84 78.90 10 147.61 88.92 11 155.47 98.00 * ** 1.045 * ** FAILURE SURFACE SPECIFIED BY 11 COORDINATE POINTS POINT X -SURF Y -SURF NO. (FT) (FT) 1 43.67 28.00 2 57.66 28.26 3 71.46 30.64 4 84.73 35.09 S 97.19 41.51 6 108.50 49.75 7 118.43 59.61 8 126.75 70.87 9 133.26 83.26 10 137.81 96.50 11 139.08 98.00 *-r* 1 ,05,o * ** r FAILURE_ SURFACE SPECIFIED BY 10 COORDINATE POINTS POINT X -SURF Y -SURF N0. (FT) (FT) 1 43.11 26.33 2 56.46 30.57 3 69.38 35.96 4 81.78 42.45 5 93.57 50.01 6 104.65 58.56 7 114.94 68.05 8 124.37 78.40 9 132.85 89.54 10 138.19 98.00 ** 1.052 xx* 98.00 FAILURE SUF'FACE SPECIFIED BY 11 COORDINATE POINTS POINT X -SUPF Y -SURF NO (FT) (FT) 1 43.67 28.00 2 57.67 28.23 3 71.48 30.47 4 84.83 34.69 5 97.44 40.79 6 109.03 48.64 7 119.36 58.08 ? 128.23 68.92 9 135,44 80.92 10 140.84 93.84 11 141.91 98.00 �* 1.054 *x: Y A X I 5 F T 50.00 75 00 100.00 125.00 T 5 F 7 50 .00 + ,5-()() + 100.00 + 125.00 + 150.00 + 17? .C-)n + 200.00 + 315..... ?.. 7159...... # 7 .. ..'215.?..... 7 9. .. .41,85....... 7 9.. ... ..4185.. .. 2175.9... ..430........1. .......8.59 4217 . ...... .�8 59 .t .423L... . 6. �:.1 .0 ...237. 6 ------------------------------------------- Erecutinn comolete. time = 22.95 seconds -------------------------- ----------- --- - -- I , r A 1 T 5 F 7 50 .00 + ,5-()() + 100.00 + 125.00 + 150.00 + 17? .C-)n + 200.00 + 315..... ?.. 7159...... # 7 .. ..'215.?..... 7 9. .. .41,85....... 7 9.. ... ..4185.. .. 2175.9... ..430........1. .......8.59 4217 . ...... .�8 59 .t .423L... . 6. �:.1 .0 ...237. 6 ------------------------------------------- Erecutinn comolete. time = 22.95 seconds -------------------------- ----------- --- - -- I