The URL can be used to link to this page

1997-5293 GAW July 11, 2000 Burtech Pipeline P.O. Box 323 Cardiff, CA 92007 SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT 505 S. VULCAN AVENUE (760) 633 -2650 F'.0. BOX 231010 FAX (760) 633 -2627 ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024 -3633 TOO (760) 633 -2700 Re: Cardiff Glen Subdivision (TM 89 -229) Water Improvement Materials - I st Submittal The accompanying submittal data has been reviewed and compared with the requirements of the Plans and Specifications. Corrections or comments here do not relieve the contractor from compliance with the requirements of the drawings and specifications. The contractor is responsible for confirming and correlating all quantities and dimensions, processes and techniques of construction, and of performing his work in a safe manner in compliance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. Items included in this submittal are listed noting the action taken and recommendations given and are reviewed for general conformance to the project design and in general compliance with the specifications. 1. Bolts and Nuts — Grade B bolts and nuts by Tripac are acceptable. 2. Gaskets — Gaskets by Tripac are acceptable. 3. 4" —8" PVC Pipe — Class 150 PVC pipe by J -M Pipe is acceptable. 4. Ductile Iron Fittings — Flanged and Union -Tite fittings manufactured by Tyler/Union are acceptable provided they are cement lined and seal coated in accordance with AWWA C104, with a bituminous coating. Mechanical joint fittings do not meet District standards. Amend as noted. 5. PVC Deflection, Closure and ACxPVC Adapter Couplings— Couplings by CertainTeed are acceptable. 6. Restrainer — Uni -Flange Series 1300 is acceptable. 7. Detectable Tape — Tape is acceptable as submitted. 8. Locating Wire— Wire should be 10 awg solid copper instead of stranded wire. Amend as noted. 9. Copper Tubing — Type K "Soft" copper tubing by Cambridge -Lee is acceptable. 10. Service Saddle — Jones Saddle No. J996 is acceptable. 11. Meter Box — This project will use dual meters (P -3/4 ") which will require J &R Concrete No. Wl l -B or equivalent. Also need meter box for 1 '/;' meter. Rejected — resubmit. 12. Gate Valve — Clow Gate Valve with flange ends is acceptable. Plans also call for flange by push -on gate valve. Amend as noted. 13. 2" Curb Stop — Jones No. J -1974W is acceptable. 14. 1" Curb Stop — Jones No. J-4201 is acceptable. 1� recycled paper 15. Silicon Bronze Bolts and Nuts - Bronze nuts and bolts are acceptable for 2" blow -off. 16. Bronze Adapter- Adapter is acceptable as submitted. 17. Brass Cap - Cap is acceptable as submitted. 18. 1" Corporation Stop - Jones No. J -3403 is acceptable. 19. 2" Corporation Stop - Jones No. J -1935 is acceptable. 20. 12" Valve Box - SBF 1243 is acceptable provided it is marked "WATER." Amend as noted. 21. 8" Valve Box - SBF 1208 is acceptable provided it is marked "San Dieguito Water District." Amend as noted. 22. Fire Hydrant - Jones No. 1 -3700 is acceptable. 23. Fire Hydrant Bury - Fire hydrant bury manufactured by South Bay Foundry is acceptable provided it is cement lined and seal coated in accordance with AWWA C104, with a bituminous coating. Amend as noted. 24. Fire Hydrant Extension - Extension manufactured by South Bay Foundry is acceptable provided only the top extension contains a break -off groove. Amend as noted. 25. Zinc Anode - Anode and associated material is acceptable as submitted. 26. Ground Clamp - Brass clamp is acceptable as submitted. In addition to the above comments, the following items also require submittal: Pipe zone backfill material (include grab sample) Special branch assembly for dual meters Valve casing material For those items marked "Amend as noted ", please have supplier acknowledge and no resubmittal is required. If you have any questions, please call me at (760)633 -2849. Sincerely, W cc� William O'Donnell Water Utility Planner cc: Warren Rapps, SDWD Inspector Greg Shields, City of Encinitas C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT /�� 505 S. VULCAN AVE. fA-(vjjow -�Ia/1 ENCINITAS, CA 92024 `� CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 5293CN PARCEL NO. : 260 - 65040200,05,06,07), -082- (19,20) PLAN NO.: 020 -DI JOB SITE ADDRESS: U/G WET CARDIFF GLEN - WARWICK AVE. 5293 -I Pub APPLICANT NAME CARDIFF GLEN GROUP LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 1801 EDINGER AVE. EAST #125 PHONE NO.: 714 -558 -2850 CITY: SANTA ANA STATE: CA ZIP: 92705- CONTRACTOR : BURTECH PIPELINE LICENSE NO.: 718202 INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: PENNSYLVANIA GEN'L INS POLICY NO. CCP1220757 -00 ENGINEER DUDEK & ASSOCIATES PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 7/10/00 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 11 /01 /00 PERMIT ISSUED INSPECTOR: MIKE VALLES 1. PERMIT FEE 2. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: 3. SECURITY DEPOSIT PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS PHONE NO.: 760- 634 -2822 LICENSE TYPE: A COMP POLICY EXP. DATE: 11 /01 /00 ij PSI ONA_1W- ,: 760-942-5147 BY: .00 Portion work COA Tract secured & .00 fees paid per 5293IR /II. CIP by .00 Agreement. eV .da.,d = Al-ye aao — DESCRIPTION OF WORK ---------------- ` -------- - - - - -- PUBLIC DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR 89 -229 TM, MAJOR SUBDIVISION OF 26 SFD/ 2 PVT RD /l OS 11 P &I, TO INCLUDE 89LF PIPE /2EA INLET /lEA HEADWALL /4CY RIP -RAP; & WARWICK AV PER CIP CMDOOD, TO INCLUDE 1,011LF PIPE /4EA INLET /lEA CB /2EA CO /20LF R &R /lEA LUG. RELATED SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS /REPAIR FOR ALL PUBLIC DRAIN /WATER (SDWD) /SEWER (DCS252). AS- BUILTS /lYR WARRANTY REQ'D. Letters dated Mar 10 & Apr 08 2000 apply. Pub Rd, except as noted, not incl'd. - - -- INSPECTION ---------- -- -- -- DATE -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. GNATURE \,1i¢MX->*_ tif. ffeVA2VZ PRINT NAME CIRCLE ONE: 1. OWNER 2. AGENT 3. 0TH 7. /s.eLo DATE SIGNED 766. 471•'f$ � TELEPHONE NUMBER Prnf..a•innu!'Rame f rCnmp(a Aru /xd July 5, 2000 Engineering, Planning, Environmental Sciences and Management Services City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave Encinitas, CA 92024 Corporate Office: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 V 1�1��ab 760.942.5147 Fax 760.632.0164 2226 RE: Engineer's Pad Certification for Grading Permit Number 4=13 5 -715AT Cardiff Glen; Lots 22- 26 Pursuant to Section 23.24.310 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for lots 22 through 26. AE the Engineer of Record for the subject project, 1 hereby state all rough grading, for this unit has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards. The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Construction of line grade for all engineered drainage devices have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been filed verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subjecting plan. Very truly yours, Dudek & Associates By: Steven J. Barger Project Manager C `/ /O,?v0ESSIo*, \ h�yQr Soto 18" ypi Fy W No. 34318 m Expires '0 * 09/30/00 \AIF01: &p Ivg`� .n Pad Elevation Pad Elevation Lot No. Per elan Per field measurement 22 163.0 162.95 23 160.0 159.91 24 160.0 159.92 25 160.0 159.89 26 158.0 157.96 Construction of line grade for all engineered drainage devices have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been filed verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subjecting plan. Very truly yours, Dudek & Associates By: Steven J. Barger Project Manager C `/ /O,?v0ESSIo*, \ h�yQr Soto 18" ypi Fy W No. 34318 m Expires '0 * 09/30/00 \AIF01: &p Ivg`� .n IZI V- 047—'-624 S EPRRDSON ENGR, 335 P02 JUL 20 '00 15:00 �f SHE PAR DSON ENGINEERINGAssoavuINC A +t Y, '1Yrn dl Y .vNdfNU. Iryl 01%Y.I,T I +6r . Avil: lit 1 r ng n„TV • I ;,a yiy. .,bl1lt l �A •I,t11:1 I It1Y Oil 11-1 t rn.r�ilaiai•I:�:.v ,.,. July 20, 2000 S.E.A. 8910146 Brandywine Development Corporation;` _i 1801 E. Edinger Ave., Suite 125 # Santa Ana, CA 92705 z nr ATTE?MON. Mr, liinRaeker- . ' -s Za SUBJE . Sand ut " est Res u �J Cardifl'Glen Subdivision Encinitas, Califomta Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, wo performed a sand equivalent (S.E.) test per Cal Mcthod 217 on a sample taken July 19, 2000, ham an existing sand stockpile located at the ffubject project. This is the result. S �rt (: 31. it - Respectfully submitted r ,u: SHEYARDS N ENGINpERING ASSOCIATES, INC. `# utm E. tlis, RCE/GE 5en10r Geoteehrrical EngiaeerNice President cc_ (1) Addressee (faxed) L�I)-V ech, Ann: Lee Rodriguez (taxed) 8! i iT,( 1riit;t % z'' . SheyairlsonEnginaringkjoei00,, Inc. :091, )NI HNI19 ld Mina wo :d, OOOZ'SI -�Pw rUt.W CONCRETE Fax NO. : 7607321102 :u I. 27 2000 06:570m Aasnple revel Yea On a /21YV markad ■S Renefto 081 ()r0. ANAi7S1S-' BY Cal4tormia Test S32. 1997, Departmon6 of Transpvttation Divisloo CC COOStr ctlon, Method for sstiaaticq t11e Time to carrosloe of Reinforre Concrete substructures. p6 6.3 rrini,eum Resistivity (ohm -eel 4543 Mstas Soluble Chloride (c1) (ppm) 10 Calif, Test 422 :later Soluble Sulfate (so 4) (pp6) 20 Calif. Test 417 iatil.ated Yours to corsosloa NC P1 r.,. i„ qfw Nets NC - non- Corrosive Cavironmental Couditieas Post -ir Fiji[ Wote -:.< , 7671, �///////�� /// � � � 5 fit i A •1 - . 9. 3. 4'.t CulOep.- F' Co. -SLY. tY iu t _� t.••iis ' .i Ooe soil saaplo received on 8/5/99, marked as ganeho -Del Oro. Analysts by CalifQlai■ Tait 643, 1993" Deparleeot of Tsansportation Divisidn of Construction, Method Cos tat1m6tie9 tl(e Sor+iee Life of Steel Culvcils. pH 6.3 water Added (mi) Rea3s!lvity lohsre.) sa +3 9752 6ae0 30 k 3P Sal? So 491; so so 4542 '� SO 4676 5010 years to °perforation for a 1.6 gauge, motel cu1vA Y? ae_ _ • A crbttbl t YesLclArsti00 for • 121 jaugo cvi 7 rears to perforation for a 10 gavga metal culvert. 69 years to perforation for a a gauge metal culvort. ,Mater Solublo Sulfate Calif. Test 417 Water SOJ.ubleC�hhll/o�ride Calif. Test 422 a/ ;i.'... _•. '�C4k../f, tom,' 4 5 ''d ZCb9 0'r _ ,., sC U 0.0014 0.002% A I July 24, 2000 Burtech Pipeline P.O. Box 323 Cardiff, CA 92007 SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT 505 S. VULCAN AVENUE (760) 633 -2650 P.O. BOX 231010 FAX (760) 633 -2627 ENCINITAS. CALIFORNIA 92024 -3633 TOO (760) 633 -2700 Re: Cardiff Glen Subdivision (TM 89 -229) Water Improvement Materials — 2nd Submittal The accompanying submittal data has been reviewed and compared with the requirements of the Plans and Specifications. Corrections or comments here do not relieve the contractor from compliance with the requirements of the drawings and specifications. The contractor is responsible for confirming and correlating all quantities and dimensions, processes and techniques of construction, and of performing his work in a safe manner in compliance with the requirements of the plans and specifications. Items included in this submittal are listed noting the action taken and recommendations given and are reviewed for general conformance to the project design and in general compliance with the specifications. I . 4" — 8" PVC Pipe — Class 150 PVC pipe by PW Pipe is acceptable. 2. Meter Box — J &R Concrete Box No. W 11 -B is acceptable for dual meters. 3. Special Branch Assembly — Ford Branch Valve Assembly for fire /domestic dual services is acceptable provided that it is assembled and tested at the factory. Amend as noted. 4. Ductile Iron Fittings — Flanged fittings manufactured by Sigma are acceptable. 5. Pipe Zone Backfill Material — SE 30 Fill Sand from Superior Ready Mix is acceptable as submitted. In addition to the above comments, the following items also require submittal: - Meter box for 1 '' /a" meter For those items marked "Amend as noted ", please have supplier acknowledge and no resubmittal is required. If you have any questions, please call me at (760)633 -2849. Sincerely, William O'Donnell Water Utility Planner cc: Warren Rapps, SDWD Inspector g Sh Ids, City of Encinitas '4t_ recycled paper P- f."'.., n..a fnr C —'Ile P "'M Engineering, Planning, Environmental Sciences and Management Services July 31, 2000 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave / Encinitas, CA 92024 Corporate Office: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 160.942.5141 Fax 160.632.0164 RE: Engineer's Pad Certification for Grading Permit Number 5283G Cardiff Glen; Lots 4 -8, 11 ,12 & 17 #2226 Pursuant to Section 23.24.310 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for Lots 4 -8, 11, 12 & 17. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading, for this unit has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards. The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: I� Inj 57 [ D I -�s Construction of line grade for all engineered drainage devices have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. fa truly youom"° ` " ', ��C ro RCE 23600 c` No, x3600 gyp, 23 Z i'v t Pad Elevation Pad Elevation Lot No. Per plan Per field measurement 04 165.0 164.95 05 167.0 167.04 06 168.5 168.55 07 171.0 170.95 08 170.0 170.07 11 165.0 165.08 12 164.0 164.04 17 168.0 167.95 I� Inj 57 [ D I -�s Construction of line grade for all engineered drainage devices have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. fa truly youom"° ` " ', ��C ro RCE 23600 c` No, x3600 gyp, 23 Z i'v t - - - -- �KiL_/IQiJ - - - J(4-1 &,_�- - oil �'I I i 1 •� 11 re TA � I REVISIONS APPROVED DATE /i // 260 -281 -01 1260 -281 -02 1260 -281 -111 260 -281 -12 1 260 -281 -05 REFERENCES DATE BENCHMARK SCALE DES(XtIP710N; COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BENCH MARK LOCATION: FLOMUNE OF S"M AT SOMERSET AVENUE HORIZONTAL 1' =10' AND SHEFFEID AVENUE RECORD FROM: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO VMTICAL CONTROL ._ VERTICAL CONTROL VE2TICAL 1� =8' N0.6061 P. 2/6 AUG.25.2000 3:00PY I c�� IHt£T QonT ,. ENSI 4 I II i 4 STAr�ARO S9RS D -Z 10" 0" NG7E: roc, gE;,A, AT `NvooT ultNSioN - REF1 =R 'Tv SDRS D -7 o fl -E5) D -I1, _t D -.i2 PaoJEcr. ISSOCIATi BY�. , fwl.,.n c.......... 1Ni-` sx-rr s1o4 DATE CHWD DY JOB wo.nll� DATE 25 -*SHME OFD "r 9. -1149 Ja eve wa SHEPARDSON ENGlN®PING ASSOCIATES JNC I :, , ;"' Ln¢nl Cnu.rdlnuls 1 ri�l,r.�r <i n•oi.h•i•r. September 6, 2000 Brandywine Development Corporation 1801 E. Edinger Ave., Suite 125 Santa Ana, CA 92705 ATTENTION: Mr. James Barisic SUBJECT: Status of Grading - Report No. 2 Cardiff Glen Encinitas, California Gentlemen: J\ "Y IOV ^1� I065 J'r,Klh%I A&.. tinilf 1111 4nthe. CA '17f?7)4 NX 1:'1 `16 P, I A % 1'1'1: 14', 71 S.E.A. 89101 -06 We herein provide a brief summary of the status of the earthwork construction at the subject project. The mass grading, including the building pads and roadways, is essentially complete. Lots 1, 2 and 14 require some additional minor or finish grading. The construction of the retaining walls for the building lots and roadway have been completed. The slope subdrains for the lots 1, 2, and 3 have been installed. Since the groundwater level below the lots north of Lot 3 are thought to be significantly below the finished pad level, the toe of slope subdrains for these lots, as originally shown on the plans, is not thought to be necessary. The construction of the bridge structures has not started. The construction of the sewer has been completed. Six settlement platforms have been monitored since Mayor June 2000. A tabulation of the settlement platform reading is attached. The latest measurement interval, between August 7 to September 6, 2000, indicated nil, or slight downward movement. An exception was Platform 3 on Lot 14 that showed a rise of 0.04 feet. We expect any future movement at these locations to be insignificant. September 6, 2000 -2- S.E.A. 89101 -06 If there are any questions regarding this submittal, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, SHEPARDSON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. William E. Ellis, RCE/GE Vice President cc: (1) Addressee (1) Dudek & Associates (1) Jim Boeker (hand delivered) Enclosure SETTLEMENT PLATFORM DATA Cardiff Glen Subd., Encinitas 89101 -06 rdson Engineering Days Location Platform No. Gerswhin St 3 +80 1 Gershwin St. 4 +40 2 Lot 14 3 Lot 12 4 Lot 10 5 Lot 21 6 Date Elev. Total Elev. Total Elev. Total Elev. Total Elev. Total Elev. Total Ch. Ch, Ch Ch. Ch Ch. Approximate fill depth 7' 12' 5' 15' 15' 5' 05/12 Base Elev. - Survey 1 147.68 at base 144.80 at base 05/15 Base Elev. - Survey 1 148.24 at base 151.75 at base 154.32 at base 06/05 0 Elev. transfer to top 154.89 0.00 156.91 0.00 153.13 0.00 166.85 0.00 06/06 1 Elev. survey 2 154.78 0.11 156.78 0.13 153.08 0.05 166.80 0.05 06/09 4 Elev. transfer to top 169.68 0.00 06/13 8 Elev. survey 2 169.58 0.10 165.80 at base 06/14 9 Elev. transfer to top 170.85 0.00 06/15 10 Elev. survey 2 06/20 15 Elev. survey 3 154.74 0.15 156.78 0.13 153.08 0.05 166.78 0.07 169.41 0.27 170.79 0.06 07106 31 Elev. survey 4 154.73 0.16 156.76 0.15 153.03 0.10 166.74 0.11 169.37 0.31 170.77 0.08 07/25 50 Elev. survey 5 154.73 0.16 156.76 0.15 153.03 0.10 166.76 0.09 169.38 0.30 170.76 0.09 08/07 63 Elev. survey 6 154.75 0.14 156.78 0.13 153.00 0.13 166.74 0.11 169.36 0.32 170.79 0.06 09/06 93 Elev. survey 7 154.75 0.14 156.78 0.13 153.04 0.09 166.75 0.10 169.36 0.32 170.77 0.08 rdson Engineering SHEPARDSON EIVUNMUNG ASSOCIATES 1W. Geotedmical Con ultant" Enginerrs- GeokWtile September 19, 2000 Brandywine Development Corporation 1801 E. Edinger Ave., Suite 125 Santa Ana, CA 92705 ATTENTION: Mr. James Barisic SUBJECT: Pavement Structural Section Recommendations Cardiff Glen TM #89 -229 Encinitas, California Gentlemen: 10035 Prospect Am, Suite 101 Santee, CA 92071 -4398 6191439 -9830 FAX6191449 -5827 email ®skelvardwn.com d I 00 Ip 0 S.E.A. 89101 -06 This letter presents recommendations for the asphaltic concrete pavement structural sections to be constructed for the recently graded roadways within the subject project. Representative samples of the subgrade materials were collected at two locations from the roadways. The samples were delivered to Christian - Wheeler Engineering for R -value laboratory testing. The results of the R -value tests are attached for your review. The traffic indices (TI) used in the design were obtained from the City of Encinitas. The pavement structural sections were determined in accordance with the procedures provided by California Test 301 ( CALTRANS - Manual of Tests, Vol. 2) and the CALTRANS Highway Design Manual. The final recommended pavement structural section presented herein is the minimum section as specified by the City of Encinitas Public Road Standards. The recommended structural sections for all roadways in the subdivision are as follows: Asphaltic Concrete : 4 inches Aggregate Base (Class 2): 6 inches Compacted Native Subgrade: 6 inches at 95 percent compaction The aggregate base and at upper 6" of the supporting subgrade soil should be compacted to not less than 95% of maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D1557. Further, all pavement section materials and paving procedures should comply with the "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ", latest edition, including the "Standard Special Shcpardson Engineering Associates. Inc. September 19, 2000 -2- S.E.A. 89101 -06 Provisions ", prepared by San Diego County Department of Public Works. The City of Encinitas also requires the concrete curb and gutter to be underlain by a 6 -inch layer of compacted aggregate base. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if there are any questions regarding this report. Respectfully submitted, SHEPARDSON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. William E. Ellis, RCE /GE Senior Geotechnical Engineer/Vice President cc: (2) Addressee (2) City of Encinitas Shepardson Engineering Associates. Inc. SHEPARDSON EWJ/VH NG ASSOCL49 INC Gmeehniod Cmisultmrts: Engineers- Geotnyis is September 19, 2000 Brandywine Development Corporation 1801 E. Edinger Ave., Suite 125 Santa Ana, CA 92705 ATTENTION: Mr. James Barisic SUBJECT: Pavement Structural Section Recommendations Cardiff Glen TM #89 -229 Encinitas, California Gentlemen: 10035 Prospect Aw., Suite 101 Santee, CA 92077 -4398 6191449 -9830 FAX 6191449.5824 email ®shepardsmeenm S.E.A. 89101 -06 This letter presents recommendations for the asphaltic concrete pavement structural sections to be constructed for the recently graded roadways within the subject project. Representative samples of the subgrade materials were collected at two locations from the roadways. The samples were delivered to Christian - Wheeler Engineering for R -value laboratory testing. The results of the R -value tests are attached for your review. The traffic indices (TI) used in the design were obtained from the City of Encinitas. The pavement structural sections were determined in accordance with the procedures provided by California Test 301 ( CALTRANS - Manual ofTests, Vol. 2) and the CALTRANS Highway Design Manual. The final recommended pavement structural section presented herein is the minimum section as specified by the City of Encinitas Public Road Standards. The recommended structural sections for all roadways in the subdivision are as follows: Asphaltic Concrete : 4 inches Aggregate Base (Class 2): 6 inches Compacted Native Subgrade: 6 inches at 95 percent compaction The aggregate base and at upper 6" of the supporting subgrade soil should be compacted to not less than 95% of maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D1557. Further, all pavement section materials and paving procedures should comply with the "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ", latest edition, including the "Standard Special Shepardson Engineering Associates, Inc. or September 19, 2000 -2- S.E.A. 89101 -06 Provisions ", prepared by San Diego County Department of Public Works. The City of Encinitas also requires the concrete curb and gutter to be underlain by a 6 -inch layer of compacted aggregate base. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if there are any questions regarding this report. Respectfully submitted, SHEPARDSON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. William E. Ellis, RCE /GE Senior Geotechnical Engineer /Vice President cc: (2) Addressee (2) City of Encinitas Sheparelson Engineering Associates, hic. G19}449 -5824 SI- E'PRt1SW ENGR. ff4r,.v�IG ASSOCUTES NC Inn. of l...ruu11OW, Lq ;novtr-0741yrN> September 19, 2000 Brandywine Development Corporation 1801 E. Edinger Ave., Suite 125 Santa Ana, CA 92705 ATTENTION: Mr. James Barisic SUBJECT: Pavement Structural Section Recommendations Cardiff Glen TM #89 -229 Encinitas, California pXtt 14,N�r1 Ar +' . tindr 101 4nlln', CA 112IM-4 W v l9 / H!1 9Aa1 I A X ilv / � {9 5 +N mnift2Jirlwnl. +mnnu S.E.A. 89101 -06 Gentlemen: This letter presents recommendations for the asphaltic concrete pavement structural sections to be constructed for the recently graded roadways within the subject project. Representative samples of the subgrade materials were collected at two locations from the roadways. The samples were delivered to Christian - Wheeler Engineering for R -value laboratory testing- The results of the R -value tests are attached for your review. The traffic indices (TI) used in the design were obtained from the City of Encinitas. The pavement structural sections were determined in accordance with the procedures provided by California Test 301 (CALTRANS - Manual of Tests, Vol. 2) and the CALTRANS Highway Design Manual. The final recommended pavement structural section presented herein is the minimum section as specified by the City of Encinitas Public Road Standards. The recommended structural sections for all roadways in the subdivision are as follows: Asphaltic Concrete : 4 inches Aggregate Base (Class 2): 6 inches Compacted Native Subgrade: 6 inches at 95 percent compaction The aggregate base and at upper 6" of the supporting subgrade soil should be compacted to not less than 95% of maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D1557. Further, all pavement section materials and paving procedures should comply with the "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction ", latest edition, including the "Standard Special ShepurAson Engineering AISOCIP/e), Art 619 - 449-5824 SFEPWDSW E". September 19, 2000 2 549 P03 SEP 29 '00 07 :30 Provisions ". prepared by San Diego County Department of Public Works. S.F.A. 89101 -06 The City of Encinitas also requires the concrete curb and gutter to be underlain by a 6 -inch layer of compacted aggregate base. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if there are Respectfully submitted, SHEPARDSON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. W4iam E. Ellis, RCEJGE Senior Geotechnical EngineerNice President cc: (2) Addressee (2) City of Encinitas any questions regarding this report. Shepardson Engineering Assn jafes. 1W. 619- 449 -5824 SHEPRPD50H DCP. SHEPARDSON •t' ENGINEERING Assocmus INc. June 16, 2000 Brandywine Development Corporation 1801 E. Edinger Ave , Suite 125 Santa Ana, CA 92705 ATTENTION Mr James Barisic SUBJECT Revisions to Subdrains Lot 1, 2 and 3 Cardiff Glen Encinitas, California Gentlemen. 226 P02 JUN 16 '00 10:18 S E.A. 89101 -06 This submittal provides recommendations for deepening and repositioning of the sub - drains planned on the above three lots. These modifications are intended to account for encountered position of the subsurface water on these lots. The attached drawing shows the suggested new position of the subdrains along the rear and north property lines. The subdrain should follow Alternative B details shown on Plate A5 of the Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation and Update Report, dated November 9, 1999. The minimum depth is to be increased to 5 feet and a minimum drainage gradient of 2 %. The perforated pipe section for each lot should be connected to a 6" diameter, non - perforated collector pipe positioned near the front of the lots The collector pipe should then discharge into the storm drain inlet box near Station 2 +60+ of Vivaldi Drive 619- 449 -5824 SHEPARDSON ENGR. June 16, 2000 -2- If there are any questions, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, SHEPARDSON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. William E. Ellis, RCEJGE Vice President cc: (2) Addressee (1) Dudek & Associates, Attn. Steve Barger (fax/mail) (1) Jim Boeker (fax) Enclosure 226 P03 JUN 16 '00 10:18 S.E.A. 89101 -06 ( r 0 Itu Iaki V'14 F . IBR -: 2B C o J ea ,ey C- C -a ' t60 1 p i 17 I ' Fm e,EOrain delae6 sea Altemale B of -/ PIYe A5of the SrppNmrYl Goahme ved Py� SEY @R LA UAL /� i US.'NTfOR �{ - IMM6yatbn wd UPOM RepRt• doled - . m Nevo"Amr 9, 7999 APN- 260 - 161 -61 - i 6 PVT SE6ER LATUR EASDAENT FOR IA1M: J... 3606 hooct No 6619146 mm Pie' 0 \ . zeo-lel -w, n,�e _, . -_ .: _ � �SHEPAROSON f � ,A: ��" RE7S `3$.14 Er fthc Assocl r6 I.K. Rwhetl5u0tlrain Plan m K, •� ': �.,d ..� o � Lam 1.163- Grdmia a m 1 •1' 'j? ~'^ W. m blcMitas, Gll/emla O -. ROa? 619 - 449 -5624 SNEPRRDSON EWP. 226 f01 JUN 16 '00 10:17 SHE PAR DSC) N ENGINEERING ASSOCVATES I NC. 10035 Prospect Avenue Ojai Santee, CA 92071 -4398 Voice: (619) 449 -9830 FAX: (619) 4495824 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET ETO: JIM AOEKER COMPANY: BRANDYWINE DEVELOPMENT FAX NO: 760 - 479 -1471 Y FROM: BILL ELLIS FAX NO: (619) 449 -5824 PAGES: Lead sheet plus 3 page(s). MESSAGE DATE: 6/16/00 REFERENCE SEA NO: 89101 -06 -,C 619- 449 -5824 SWPARDStN EIBR. i SHEPARDSON • "`r- ENGIN{ERING ASSOCIATES INC. June 15, 20W Brandywure Dcvelopmeat Corporation 1801 E. Edinger Ave., Suite 125 Santa Ana, CA 92705 ATTENTION, Mr. James Bansic } L�a� SUBJECT. Recamoerdation for Invert Subdivision/Stabdization Vivaldi Drive Cardiff Glen Encinitas, Califomia Gentlemen. 220 P02 JUN 15 '00 15:05 SYL& 89101-06 JW 2 12000 1-11, I ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF ENCINITAS We herewith provide recommendations for installing a subdrain/stabilization zone below the invert of the sewer to be constructed at the subject project. The relatively high groundwater encountered and the deep trench planned prompts us to make this recommendation. The recommendation is intended to assist in the trench dewatermg and to promote a more stable base for the sewer bedding. We have attached excerpted copies of the grading plan (Plates AI and A2) that shows the groundwater levels along the Vivaldi Drive sewer alignment, as encountered during the drilling of supplemental exploratory borings on May 31, 2000 In some locations there may be up to 15 feet of water above the sewer invert level The attached sewer trench sub -drain and stabilization detail (Plate A3) shows our tecormriendation for a two - foot deep subdram below the originally planned sewer trench bottom Crushed rock back5ll of this subdrain zone and the pipe zone to one -foot above the pipe is recommended The rock/pipe zone is lobe totally encased with a gootextile filter wrap This detail would apply for that section of the Vivaldi Drive sewer from Station 2+00 to Station 8 +27, and along Sewer Line B to Bach Strut. A 10 -inch mmunum diameter, iron - perforated pipe should be installed outride the sewer alignment, and south of the Sewer Station 2 +00 to carry collected water for ultimate discharge into the natural drainage channel near the recently constructed headwall/rip rap of the storm drain crossing at the Rossini sewer extension. A cast -in -place concrete cut -off wall should be installed in the trench near Station 2100 at the juncture of the drain pipe and the subdrain coming off of the Sh p"rdwn Einglneanng Arse w, Inc. 619 - 449 -5624 SFEPftRDSQd EFC,R' 220 P03 JlN 15 ' 00 15:05 June 15, 2000 -2- S.E.A. 89101 -06 sewer trench bottom, The wall should be at least 8- inches thick and extend at least 12 inches beYond the perimeter of the rock -filled portion of the coiurcettng trench. A temporary cut-off wall is recommended in the trench of Sewer Line A near Station 11 +75. This cutoff is intended to reduce the flow of water tamed within the trench backfill envelope that would otherwise tend to flow to the sewer trench along Vivaldi Drive. The cutoff may be similar to that shown as Type B - Drawing S -10 of the San Diego Regional Standards . If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, SMEPARDS N ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. William E. Ellis, RCE/GE Senior Geolechnieal Engineer /Vice President WEE;sj oc: (2) Addressee (I) Dudek & Associates, Attu: Steve Barger Enclosures Shepardson Engineering Associates, Inc. �3 100 F tw tae 170 4 �n .. tr....n� � a d •u nia.ry .. u• •. i,.:t ;s � •wfLLt.W, _Ir• i lu _� xis 9; �,c '••° �► _ l ,,...eeo�_ 8,81 Sam r ___ y SEWER PROFILE LINE B 770 PROFIT sutra r. �. • 1 PROFILE aorc m ar cute acv. - CL . MM H E PAAmI K Lw+.rl nrbr If i.1 all ta0 LEGEND S• Boring Location - wady Level (data obaarvedl r. (19707 -0b Dad: June. 3000 role LOCATION MAP Al Borings at Sewer Alignments Cardiff Glen - Encinitas, CA 619 - 444-5824 SFEPHRDE'ON ENGR" 220 P05 JUN 15 '00 15:05 r O•_ 0p Viv" Dr. tIMSH GRADE 3 V IN =h 160 VIM p 160 ISO po 1 15.31-001 rY- S' MIN. COVER BELOW CREEK W ,! ,ANUVUM ; 264.0r OF S' SEWER - Le 140 = u n 9" Pobrt Fm ° z ? yy _ Y W 1 N J Y 7 W W o m = � SEWER PROFILE, LINES A 8 4 N I 12.00 p -00 w.00 10 vi ' 8100 ' 4• 6101 1.1 5 I I Z wII'•I � '� IW � ' > 3 Ali e � m li v; o {�• `ate I) Q Of lI PLAN- SEWER LINE A `II> fI SHEPARDSON Dale June, 2000 Project No $9101.06 A EwGEMERxrG .ISSObntts INC LOCATION MAP A2 C,.yfrr4�ualC«aalMMl Bciinps at Sewer AEgnments Evaiws G. olvjwn Carc iM Glen - Encinitas. CA olne SEA R 00 A" .w 619- 449-5824 SFE.PPRDSON ENGR. 220 P06 JUN 15 '00 15:06 34" Crushed rock o n n � Pipe zone bac kfill encasement o O8" dia. sewer Bedding Geolexlile wrap Mirafi 140N or Contech C40NWN Sub-drain/stabilization zone similiar ° Date: June, 2000 Project No: 09101 -N Ptab APOSHEPARDSON ENGINEERING Assoc%Tu INC. Sewer Trench Sub -drain 6 Stabilization AW Ge &k +nical Co Wft nhr Wald DIWe A3 Ensineen Gedogith Caralr Glen Subdvision Encinitas, caliromia SHEPARDSON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC. Geotedmical Qmsidtaot._ E og i r i een -Geol eg is i s 6 `V' May 19, 2000 G l-7� Brandywine Corporation 1801 E. Edinger Ave., Suite 125 Santa Ana, CA 92705 ATTENTION: Mr. James L. Barisic SUBJECT: Alternative Bridge Foundation Recommendations Brandywine Project (Cardiff Glen Subdivision) Encinitas, California Gentlemen: 10035 prospect Ave. S,mtee. CA 92071 -4398 .ta Ij-10 I.S30 S.E.A. 89101 -06 We herein provide an alternative method for supporting the bridge foundations that are currently planned to cross the natural drainage course at two locations. The widths of the proposed concrete bridges are approximately 20 feet at the Lots 20/21 crossing, and approximately 76 feet for the bridge crossing of Street A. Current bridge plans show a clear span of approximately 16 feet with a rise of approximately 7 feet. Recommendations for the bridge ground preparation and foundations was provided in the "Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation and Update Report", dated November 9, 1999. This report recommended that the foundation/approach fills of the road bridges, to be removed down to the firm Baypoint Formation, and the grade brought up to final grade with compacted fill. At both locations, the contact with the Baypoint Formation is at depths on the order of 4 to 7 feet below the groundwater level encountered on the date of the investigation. As noted in the report, dewatering and diversion of the surface water within the drainage would be required to facilitate the loose soil removal and replacement with compacted fill. We herein provide an alternate method for ground preparation under the foundations that reduceF the dewatering requirements and the possible problems with compaction replacement fill. The base of the bridge foundations is presently shown on the plans at a level on the order of approximately 3 feet below the groundwater level. Therefore, some dewatering would be required with the alternate method in order to facilitate construction of the cast -in -place bridge foundations on a dry platform. Shepardsou Engineering Associates, lac. May 19, 2000 -2- S.E.A. 89101 -06 The attached drawing illustrates a gravel support system below the foundations. Briefly stated, the excavation would be carried underwater, down to the Baypoint Formation. The required limits beyond the outward faces of the foundations, are shown on the attached drawing. Following removal of the loose materials, a strong geotextile drainage fabric would be draped across the excavation bottom/sides. We recommend a geotextile similar to TC Mirafy 1120N, or Contech C- 120NW. A 3/4 ", maximum size, crushed rock would then be infilled. The crushed rock should be placed while subject to vibration by submerged vibrators to assist in the consolidation of the rock under water. Crushed rock would be brought up to the level of the proposed base of the foundation, and the geotextile lapped at least 4 feet. This foundation treatment should underlie all the proposed bridge foundations, including those for the bridge wing walls. To facilitate the lowering of the groundwater as needed for construction of the foundations, the contractor may wish to incorporate drainage pipes or a sump well within the crushed rock to allow pumping and lowering of the water table to a sufficient level to allow foundation form and concrete placement. The lowered groundwater would have to be maintained until all the soil backfill atop the gravel support system has been backfilled to a level above the static water level. The foundation system supported by the above crushed rock support system should be designed for allowable bearing pressures not exceeding 3,000 lbs. /sq. ft. We trust the above information will assist you in processing the bridge plans. If there are any questions, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, SHEPARDSON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. William E "Ellis, RCE /GE Senior Geotcchnical EngineerNice President cc: (2) Addressee (fax) (1) Brandywine, Attn: Jim Boeker (far) (1) Phoenix Gunite (fax) (1) Dudek and Associates (fax) Enclosure Shepardson Engineenng Associates. Inc. * Snr:n I- E/ /6' -7 r Notes: The above details are intended for both bridge sites and should be applied to all foundations including abutments and wingwalls. The elevatons shown above for the formational stratum and the ground water level are representive of the conditions at the Lot 20/21 site and will differ slightly at the Bach St. site. - refer to the Improvement plans for dimensions. �A /-�O SEC 77ON jA - 0 _2' 4 - -.._. __.. _ _ 8' C /S2 TYPICAL BRIDGE SECTION Applies to Lot 20/21 and Bach St. bridges The above drawing is a modified excerpt from the Improvement Plans (Dwg.5293,CS -252) prepared by Dudek & Associates and dated April 17, 2000. SEA R qt Pp ljEE SHEPARDSON ENGINEfItIrvG ASSOCIATES INC. AIPPW Gwahninl Ca Wft%n: ExjiR - GwLIiW TCti1i/if / /Zola I �n�EC% C- /2oNY✓ I Job Number: 89101 -06 I Data: May, 2000 Plata Alternative Bridge Foundation Support Method Cardiff Glen Subdivision Al Encinitas, California STATE OF CALIFORNIA -THE RESOURCES AGENCY FAI IFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO AREA 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO, CA 921061725 (619) SV4006 GRAY DAVIS, Gov mor COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. A- 6- ENC -98 -129 Page 1 of 6 On February 5, 1999 , the California Coastal Commission granted to Brandywine Development this permit for the development described below, subject to the attached Standard and Special Conditions. ORIGINAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Subdivision of 16 acres into 31 single - family residential lots, one open space lot and one remainder lot, to include demolition of several existing structures, grading, drainage and street improvements resulting in fill of .31 acre riparian and freshwater marsh habitat. On -site mitigation is proposed for the wetland impacts. PROJECT LOCATION: South of Santa Fe Drive between Rubenstein Avenue and Starlight Drive, Encinitas, San Diego County. APN(s) 260- 082 -19, 20; 260 -650- 02, 05, 06 and 07 Issued on behalf of the California Coastal Commission by PETER DOUGLAS Executive Director and IMPORTANT: THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID UNLESS AND UNTIL A COPY OF THE PERMIT WITH THE SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGMENT HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE COMMISSION OFFICE. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The undersigned permittee acknowledges receipt of this permit and agrees to abide by all terms and conditions thereof. Dafe Signat of Permittee COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. A- 6- ENC -98 -129 Page 2 of 6 STANDARD CONDITIONS: Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgment. The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. 2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. Compliance. All development must occur in strict compliance with the proposal as set forth below. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Commission approval. 4. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission. 5. Inspections. The Commission staff shall be allowed to inspect the site and the development during construction, subject to 24 -hour advance notice. 6. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 7. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The permit is subject to the following conditions: 1. Final Wetlands/Riparian Mitigation Plans, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the applicant shall submit to the Executive Director for review and written approval, a final wetland mitigation plan for all freshwater marsh and riparian impacts associated with the proposed project. The final mitigation plan shall be in substantial conformance with the mitigation plan submitted with this application by Dudek and Associates, Inc. dated December 28, 1998. The permittee shall undertake mitigation in accordance with the approved plans. Any proposed changes to the approved plans shall be reported to the Executive Director. No changes to the plans shall occur without a Coastal Commission approved amendment to COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. A- 6- ENC -98 -129 Page 3 of 6 this coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is required. 2. Final Revised Monitoring Program. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the applicant shall submit for review and written approval of the Executive Director a final revised monitoring program designed by a qualified wetland biologist. Said monitoring program shall be in substantial conformance with the monitoring plan submitted with this application by Dudek and Associates, Inc. dated December 28, 1998, but shall be revised to include the following: a. Submittal, within 30 days of completion of construction (i.e., grading, planting and installation of irrigation devices) at the mitigation site, of an as -built assessment of the mitigation project that includes as -built plans, to determine if the project has been built as proposed. b. Annual reports on the monitoring program shall be submitted to the Executive Director for approval for a period of five years. Each report shall include copies of all previous reports as appendices. Each annual report shall also include a "Performance Evaluation" section where information and results from the monitoring program are used to evaluate the status of the mitigation project in relation to the performance standards detailed in the mitigation plan. c. At the end of the five year period, a comprehensive monitoring report prepared in conjunction with a qualified wetland biologist shall be submitted to the Executive Director for review and approval. This comprehensive report shall consider all of the monitoring data collected over the five -year period in evaluating the mitigation project performance. If the report indicates that the mitigation has been, in part, or in whole, unsuccessful, the applicant shall be required to submit a revised or supplemental mitigation program to compensate for those portions of the original program which were not successful. The revised mitigation program, if necessary, shall be processed as an amendment to the subject coastal development permit. The permittee shall undertake monitoring in accordance with the approved program. Any proposed changes to the approved program shall be reported to the Executive Director. No changes to the program shall occur without a Coastal Commission approved amendment to this coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is required. 3. Grading and Erosion Control. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the applicant shall submit to the Executive Director for review and written approval, final grading plans and erosion control plans approved by the City of Encinitas. Said plans shall incorporate the following: a. All permanent and temporary erosion control measures shall be developed and installed prior to or concurrent with any on -site grading activities. Sediment basins (debris basins, desilting basins, or silt traps) and other temporary erosion control measures such as berms, interceptor ditches, sandbagging, hay bales, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. A- 6- ENC -98 -129 Page 4 of 6 filtered inlets, debris basins, silt traps, or other similar means shall be installed in conjunction with the initial grading operation and maintained throughout the development process as necessary to remove sediment from runoff waters draining from the land undergoing development. b. Demonstration that all on -site temporary and permanent runoff and erosion control devices are installed and the City Engineer of Encinitas has determined that all measures are in place and operating to minimize soil loss from the construction site. The permittee shall undertake development in accordance with the approved grading and erosion control plans. Any proposed changes to the approved plans shall be reported to the Executive Director. No changes to the plans shall occur without a Coastal Commission approved amendment to this coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is required. 4. Drainage/Runoff Control. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the applicant shall submit final drainage and runoff control plans approved by the City of Encinitas. Said plans shall be designed by a licensed engineer qualified in hydrology and hydraulics, and assure no increase in peak runoff rate from the developed site over runoff that would occur from the existing undeveloped site, as a result of a ten -year frequency storm over a six -hour duration (10 year, 6 hour rainstorm). Runoff control shall be accomplished by such means as on -site detention/desilting basins. Energy dissipating measures at the terminus of outflow drains shall be constructed. The runoff control plan, including supporting calculations, shall be submitted to, reviewed and approved in writing by the Executive Director. The permittee shall undertake the development in accordance with the approved plans. Any proposed changes to the approved plans shall be reported to the Executive Director. No changes to the plans shall occur without a Coastal Commission approved amendment to this coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is required. 5. Final Improvement Plans. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the applicant shall submit final improvement plans approved by the City of Encinitas for proposed on- and off -site improvements associated with the proposed development (private streets, two bridge crossings and storm drain systems). Said plans shall be subject to the review and written approval of the Executive Director. The permittee shall undertake the development in accordance with the approved plans. Any proposed changes to the approved plans shall be reported to the Executive Director. No changes to the plans shall occur without a Coastal Commission approved amendment to this coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is required. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. A- 6- ENC -98 -129 Page 5 of 6 6. Street Sweeping. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the applicant shall submit to the Executive Director for review and written approval, a final street sweeping program, which includes the following elements: a. Street sweeping shall occur at least monthly and shall begin immediately upon completion of all on -site private street improvements and continue through the life of the project. b. Street sweeping shall be by means of a vacuumized sweeper and at least three passes shall be made along each curb. c. This program shall be incorporated into any Covenant, Code and Restrictions (CCR's) for the development. The permittee shall undertake street sweeping in accordance with the approved program. Any proposed changes to the approved program shall be reported to the Executive Director. No changes to the program shall occur without a Coastal Commission approved amendment to this coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is required. 7. Other Permits. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the applicant shall submit to the Executive Director for review and written approval, copies of all other required state or federal discretionary permits for the development herein approved. Any mitigation measures or other changes to the project required through said permits shall be reported to the Executive Director and shall become part of the project. Such modifications, if any, may require an amendment to this permit or a separate coastal development permit. 8. Future Development. This permit is for the subdivision of 16 acres, site preparation, including rough grading, construction of roads and trails, utility and drainage improvements,and mitigation for impacts to environmentally sensitive habitat areas. All other development proposals for the site, including, but not limited to, construction of residential structures or other structures, shall require review and approval under a separate coastal development permit or an amendment to this permit. 9. Final Landscape Plans. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the applicant shall submit a detailed landscape plan for the interim and any long -term plantings indicating the type, size, extent and location of all plant materials, any proposed irrigation system and other landscape features. Drought tolerant native and naturalizing plants shall be utilized to the maximum extent feasible. Said plan shall be developed in consultation with the Department of Fish and Game to assure species inherently noxious to environmentally sensitive species are avoided and shall be submitted to, reviewed and approved in writing by the Executive Director and include the following: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITNO. A- 6- ENC -98 -129 Page 6 of 6 a. A planting schedule that indicates that the interim planting plan shall be implemented within 60 days of completion of grading. b. A written commitment by the applicant that all required plantings shall be maintained in good growing conditions, and whenever necessary, shall be replaced with new plant materials. The permittee shall undertake the landscaping in accordance with the approved plans. Any proposed changes to the approved plans shall be reported to the Executive Director. No changes to the plans shall occur without a Coastal Commission approved amendment to this coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is required. 10. Open Space Deed Restriction. No development, as defined in section 30106 of the Coastal Act shall occur in the area generally described as wetland and buffer areas surrounding Rossini Creek as shown on the attached Exhibit 'A" except for necessary storm drain and desiltation/pollution basins, two bridge crossings across Rossini Creek and grading and planting to accomplish proposed mitigation for impacts to sensitive habitat areas and maintenance of the mitigation area. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the applicant shall execute and record a restriction in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director, reflecting the above restriction on development in the designated open space area. The deed restriction shall include legal descriptions of both the applicant's entire parcel and open space area. The deed restriction shall run with the land, binding all successors and assigns, and shall be recorded free of prior liens that the Executive Director determines may affect the enforceability of the restriction. This deed restriction shall not be removed or changed without a Coastal Commission- approved amendment to this coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is necessary. (6129p) SHEPARDSON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC. January 20, 2000 Brandywine Development Corporation 1801 E. Edinger Ave., Suite 125 Santa Ana, CA 92705 ATTENTION: Mr. James L. Barisic SUBJECT: Estimate of Scour Potential Drainage Channel Brandywine Project Encinitas, CA Dear Mr. Barisic: S.E.A. 89101 -04 In response to the request of Dudek and Associates, we herein provide our opinions regarding the scour potential of the soils within the channel at the subject project. The subdivision project plans maintain the existing drainage channel with the addition of approach embankments that will flank the channel at the sites of two roadway bridge crossings. The embankments will be constructed with materials excavated from the site. We understand that there is a comprehensive plan to promote the native vegetation in the channel, as well as replant similar vegetation in areas that are exposed or newly created by the proposed grading. The native soils, and the expected embankment soils, are silty sands to clayey sands. We estimate that the permissible velocity of water flow within the channel where the soils are covered by native vegetation that is well established is on the order of 5 feet per second. Sh"rdson Engineering Associates, Inc. January 20, 2000 -2- S.E.A. 89101 -04 We trust the above information will assist you in completion of the project design. If there are any questions, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, SHEPARDSON ENCH ASSOCIATES, INC. WilT-aam E. Ellis, RCE/GE Senior Geotechnical EngineerNice President WEE:sj cc: (1) Addressee (3) Dudek & Associates (1 fared) Atm Mr. Steve Barger w No "9 * Exp 9 -3o -o7 At 1 Shepanlson Engineenng Associates. Inc. 1 SHE PAR DJJN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC. O'r rLiIIIIi11II l . w•Il ll, w I, I II 'I F4 (eS.IdJP.I.. September 5, 1997 Pasco Engineering 535 N. Hwy 101 Suite A Solana Beach, CA 92075 ATTENTION: Mr. Mike Smith �- ///111 Ilel .. I•r •.Ih�I 1. r r S.E.A. 89101 -03 SUBJECT: Geotechnical Considerations for Grading Plan Preparation Brandywine Development Encinitas, CA Reference: Report of.- Geotechnical Investigation ![ un 11 l5 lUJ V l5 Rosini Parkview Subdivision I U OCT 16 1997 Encinitas, CA ENGINEERING SERVICES Oct. 26, 1989 CITY OF ENCINITAS Gentlemen: This letter is intended to provide geotechnical recommendations supplemental to our referenced report, that can assist your preparation of the project grading plans. We have reviewed the preliminary topographic map and cross - sections for the westerly boundary area of the project as submitted to our office on August 26, 1997. Our comments relative to this area of the project are as follows. 1. If the retaining wall on the westerly property that adjoins Lot 26 should fall upon, or near the plan slopes, we recommend a minimum setback of 8 feet horizontal between the footing and the face of the slope. The footing of the wall would need to be exposed to verify its position relative to property line and the proposed slope. 2. We understand you plan to provide fill slopes at a ratio of 2 horizontal to 1 vertical with the top of the slope set back approximately 5 feet from the property line. This setback is to allow for the construction of the fence and the browditch. This configuration will generally result in composite slopes consisting of fill on the upper portion and cut into the formational materials at the lower areas of the slope. With proper base key Sh"rdron Engineering Associates, (nc. September 5, 1997 -2- S.E.A. 89101 -03 benching of the fill slope portion this plan should be suitable for the construction of the slopes. We also recommend a surface drain in the heel of the bottom key. We will be submitting details for the above for your final plans. 3. There are existing deep, steep incuts into the native slopes near the common area of Lots 29 and 30 which will require special design consideration. The adjoining properties to the west have existing retaining walls, footings, and steep cuts that look marginally stable, and which could adversely impact Lots 29 and 30. During our site visit in June, seepage was noted to be outcropping some portions of some of the existing slope. Buttress fills and /or engineered retaining structures appear to be warranted in order to positively stabilize this area. We can work with your office on further details when you are further along in your planning. 4. The proposed 2:1 slopes on the western side of Lot 31 will be partly in total cut and partly in fill where a broad ravine /depression lies within the middle portion of the natural slopes. A key, benching and subsurface drain similar to that discussed in No. 2 above will be required. The proposed extension of Warwick Ave. into the southeast corner of the project will require a retaining wall to support the higher ground and property along the south side of the right of way. An existing house in this area is approximately 5 feet away from the property line. In June we performed a shallow boring in this area to assess the soil conditions as they may affect the design and constructibility of this retaining wall, as it is affected by the near proximity of the existing structure. These soil conditions are generally favorable with a lightly cemented sandstone formation present to a depth of 6 feet. Below this depth, the material looses cementation and is of low cohesion. The upper 5 or 6 feet should provide generally stable excavations. However, any excavation for the wall that extends below a plane inclined 45 degrees from the foundation of the structure, or any improvements, will require special provisions during excavation in order to prevent the undermining of the structural improvements. Again, we can work with your office regarding further details regarding any special provisions when final grading plans become available. Shepardson Engineering Associates, Inc. September 5, 1997 -3- S.E.A. 89101 -03 This submittal is intended to provide you with preliminary information. We will work with your office to incorporate these recommendations into the final grading plan. Once that is completed, we can provide a final update addendum report that can be the official document of record supplementing to our previous geotechnical investigation report. If there are any questions concerning this information, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, SHEPARDSOj l ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. William E. Ellis, G.E. 293 Senior Geotechnical EngineerNice President WEE:sj cc: (2) Addressee Shepardson Engineering Assaiares, Inc. 619 - 449 -5824 SFEPW2DSON EWBR. 621 P02 OCT 23 '00 14:18 SHEPARDSO��Nr APOEnlGene;ftraYG AiSOCwTES lilti f n5tln hmnd 1 ru.ull.un: I IXt 15 Ihm14'.I AIr . SI lr 1111 nguur.. I 4r�nl• Snnhr, (A 9210%1 -4 f9d 614/144.4N.kl !'AX h14 /744 -SNd4 +uniA4Jutmat.nn r.rur October 23, 2000 S.EA. 89101 -06 Brandywine Development Corporation 1801 E. Edinger Ave., Suite 125 n Santa Ana, CA 92705 V �j ATTENTION: Mr. James Barisic SUBJECT: Recommendations for Pavement Subgrade Stabilization Cardiff Glen TM #89 -229 Encinitas, California Gentlemen: This letter presents recommendations for stabilizing areas of unstable subgrade within the roadways at the subject project. Very moist subgrade soils resulting in unstable conditions have been observed in scattered locations along the alignments of Warwick Avenue and Vivaldi Drive. In the unstable areas we recommend removal of a layer of the existing subgrade, the placement of a geotextile fabric at the base of the excavation, and then the refilling to the planned level with compacted aggregate base. The reconuriended removal depth is 6 inches mimmurn below the planned subgrade elevation, Thegeotextile is intended to provide separation and reinforcement below the base, thereby enhancing the performance of the structural section. Geotextiles suitable for the on -site conditions may be selected from the following: ADS 9750 AMOCO 4.512 Carthage FX -66 Contech C -120 NW doo-� TC Mirafi 112ON TNS E120 Shepordson Engineering Anocialer, Ine. 619- 449 -5824 SHEPARDSON ENGR. 621 P03 OCT 23 100 14:18 October 23, 2000 -2- S.E.A. 89101 -06 Other geotextiles with equivalent properties may be submitted for consideration. Care should be taken to select the equipment used to place and compact the aggregate base that can provide the necessary compaction while not overstressing the in -place subgrade. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if there are any questions regarding this subject. Respectfully submitted. SHEPARDS N ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. .�A,�W op.� William E. Ellis, RCE/GE Senior Geotechnical Engineer /Vice President WEE: cc: (2) Addressee (1) Jim Boeker(fax) Shepard.ron Engrneering Aatodatrs, Inc. 9CY.21.2�Uo 8:21AN &ASSOCIATES INC. P"*%*W M.. ti c." hµn, October 23. 2000 241111W ER, PWINDp, turd sinew an/ i nwoo 9twises City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave Encinitas, CA 92024 Corporate office: 00 'rNrd Sent EaCinaas, CaMornla 91024 NO. 6610 ?. 2/2 710.WA147 Fei 100.071.01% #2226 RE. Engineer's Cen�&atfon for Card jQ` Gen, Vfialff Drive and Warwick Avnwe subgmndes This letter is hereby submitted to address the subjrade for proposed Vivaldi Drive and Warwick Avenue I hereby State that grading for these streets has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards. The average subgrade elevations are 0 02 feet higher than necessary to provide for the street section of 4 inches A.0 over 6 inches base Very truly yours, k & Assotaates,1 anal 410. Mr .11 iI♦ .CP 23.2000 2:24111 1 & ASSOCIATES, INC. %''a`wV+s/ Taw• b fNq ter V ^ n • • sit Fneieeerlee, INanieg • Fnrironntut6l SOiencN lnd Mlneglmeot SIr►icrl City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave Encinitas, CA 921)24 cmorstt orfiel: 6M 7A rd StrN: EnV itee. LlGlornil 9te24 NC. 6604 P. 2/2 nnwstn FUI t1M1632t11N 1!2226 8E: Engineer's Cer#ficatioa for Cardiff Glen; Gershwin street and part. jai Bach Street subgrades This letter is hereby submitted to address the subgrade from Sta. 0 +70 to Sta 5 +25. for proposed Gtrshw n Street and Bach Street I hereby snte that grading for these stretts has been completed in conforrnance with the approved plans and requirements Of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards, the average over 6 ids elevations are 0.03 feet lower than necessary to provide for the meet section of 4 inches A,C over 6 inches base. Very truly yours, & AB �P.E. �` �~� � �� J✓yam C� �� Engineering, Planning, Corporate Office: Environmental Sciences and 605 Third Street 760.942.5147 Management Services Encinitas, California 92024 Fax 760.632.0164 October 23. 2000 $tl City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave Encinitas, CA 92024 #2226 RE. Engineer's Certification for Cardiff Glen; Vivaldi Drive and Warwick Avenue subgrades This letter is hereby submitted to address the subgrade for proposed Vivaldi Drive and Warwick Avenue. I hereby state that grading for these streets has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards. The average subgrade elevations are 0.02 feet higher than necessary to provide for the street section of 4 inches A.0 over 6 inches base. Very truly yours, udek & Associates GLCU i� aniel C. Groth. �. IVY Engineering, Planning, Corporate Office: Environmental Sciences and 605 Third Street 760.942.5147 Pmk .... �.I n.., 6". (`�mPa, P �, M Management Services Encinitas, California 92024 Fax 760.632.0164 October 23, 2000 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave Encinitas, CA 92024 #2226 RE. Engineer's Certification for Cardiff Glen; Gershwin Street and partial Bach Street subgrades This letter is hereby submitted to address the subgrade for proposed Gershwin Street and Bach Street from Sta. 0 +70 to Sta. 5 +25. I hereby state that grading for these streets has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards. The average subgrade elevations are 0.03 feet lower than necessary to provide for the street section of 4 inches A.0 over 6 inches base. Very truly yours, ek & Associad s /� �� 1J�6 /1iK� ameal�C` Gro Na C23600 E)p IVI > ,s�,a r Mr. Jim Boeker Superintendent, Brandywine Development 400 Block Santa Fe Avenue Encinitas, CA. 92024 NOTICE OF VIOLATION / CORRECT WORK October 30, 2000 RE: PUMPING OF SEDMIENT LADEN WATER AND UNCONTROLLED SEDIMENT RUNOFF INTO ROSSINI CANYON CREEK, ENCINITAS, CA. Dear Mr. Boeker After inspecting the post rainfall conditions of your project, staff determined that direct runoff from recently graded areas, improperly managed sediment -laden water, and temporary work within the drainage is contributing sediment pollution to Rossini Canyon Creek and the San Elijo Lagoon. Specifically, the following activities contributed sediment pollution to the creek: • unprotected slopes and failing silt fences were inadequate to prevent erosion and contain silty runoff (see photos); • pumping of sediment -laden (chocolate milk) water indirectly to the creek via a storm drain (see photo). • unstabilized temporary work areas within the drainage contributed to scouring and sedimentation (see photo). It is the City's goal to obtain you voluntary compliance with the applicable rules and regulations. Muncipal Code section 23.24 requires that adequate erosion and sedimentation control measures be implemented as shown on the approved grading plan and section 64.08 prohibits the discharge of pollutants to storm drains and surface waters. You can bring your project into compliance by: • fully implementing and maintaining the approved erosion control plan for the project (including protection of cut and fill slopes with erosion prevention measures • educating all contractors and subcontractors about discharge prohibitions stabilizing the streambed to eliminate scouring A citation may be issued for any future unauthorized discharges of sediment. City stormwater staff appreciates your immediate attention to this matter. If you have any questions please call Ms. Katherine Weldon at 760 - 633 -2632 or Mr. Mike Valles at 760- 633 -2807. Si cerely arret illiams Environmental Health Enforcement Officer TEL 760 - 633 -2600 / FAX 760 -1633- 2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 4� reCyCled paper & ASSOCIATES, INC. P..qc. ...rv.l T-- brr C.,nrpM1 a P�,par, November 17, 2000 Engineering, Planning, .. Environmental Sciences and Management Services City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave Encinitas, CA 92024 Corporate Office: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 D� 2 0 2000 I NGINEERING SERVICES 1 Y OF ENCINItgg RE: Engineer's Pad Certification for Grading Permit Number 5283G Cardiff Glen; Lots 1,2,3,9,10, 13-16,18-21 160.942.5147 Fax 760 632.0164 #2226 Pursuant to Section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for Lots 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 13 -16, 18 -21. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading, for this unit has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards. The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Lot No, 01 02 03 09 10 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 Pad Elevation Per plan 153.0 157.0 161.5 168.0 166.0 160.5 153.5 164.0 164.0 167.0 167.0 169.75 169.75 Pad Elevation Per field measurement 152.95 157.07 161.52 168.00 166.07 160.45 153.55 164.02 163.97 167.00 167.00 169.73 169.75 Construction of line grade for all engineered drainage devices have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. Very truly yours, udek & Associat s 1 1 Daniel C. Groth RCE 23600 Ha C236M EAp, i Z 3r i, Engineering, Planning, Environmental Sciences and Management Services July 31, 2000 City of Encinitas i Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave / Encinitas, CA 92024 Corporate Office. 605 Third Street Encinitas, Celifomia 92024 760342.5147 Fax 760.6320164 RE: Engineer's Pad Certification for Grading Permit Number 5283G Cardiff Glen; Lots 4-8, 11,12 & 17 #2226 Pursuant to Section 23.24.310 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for Lots 4-8, 11, 12 & 17. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading, for this unit has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards. The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. ry truly yours, Du k & As�gci�tn�� an r�`'I/( /�rJ' RCE 23600 •'f Cud 7 2 Pad Elevation Pad Elevation Lot No. Per plan Per field measurement 15 04 165.0 164.95 05 167.0 167.04 06 168.5 168.55 07 171.0 170.95 — O8 170.0 170.07 -10 11 165.0 165.08 12 164.0 164.04 116- Po 17 168.0 167.95 Construction of line grade for all engineered drainage devices have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. ry truly yours, Du k & As�gci�tn�� an r�`'I/( /�rJ' RCE 23600 •'f Cud 7 2 r,ah «w.a r - Po, C- W- P,ti�- July 5, 2000 Engineering, Planning, Eirironmental Sciences and MsnagementServices City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Ave Encinitas, CA 92024 Corporate (mice: 605 Third Street Encinitas, Califomia 92024 J, Y IJ'�tOa 760.942.5147 Fax 760.632.0164 2226 RE. Engineer's Pad Certification for Grading Permit NumberJ233rr 5Z93� Cardiff Glen; Lots 22.26 Pursuant to Section 23.24.310 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification letter for lots 22 through 26. As the Engineer of Record for the subject project, I hereby state all rough grading, for this unit has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards. The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Construction of line grade for all engineered drainage devices have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been filed verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject.grading plan. n\\ Very truly yours, Dudek & Associates \ '•, By: Steven J. Barger Project Manager Q� SOIF ENV,( y e� NO �19t8 i r Pad Elevation Pad Elevation Lot No. Per plan Per field measurement 22 163.0 162.95 23 160.0 159.91 24 160.0 159.92 25 160.0 159.89 26 158.0 157.96 Construction of line grade for all engineered drainage devices have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been filed verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject.grading plan. n\\ Very truly yours, Dudek & Associates \ '•, By: Steven J. Barger Project Manager Q� SOIF ENV,( y e� NO �19t8 i r 619- 449 -5824 SHEPARDSON ENGR. 842 P01 JAN 02 '01 16:32 ' S H E P A R co S O N ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES I NC. Geotechnical Consultants Engineers - Geologists 10035 Prospect Avenue, Suite 101 o Santee, CA 92071 -4398 Phone: (619) 449 -9830 FAX: (619) 449 -5824 TO: Robert Bradford COMPANY: Brandywine 1 FROM: Bill Ellis FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET PAGES: Lead sheet plus:. page(s) MESSAGE DATE: 1/2/01 REFERENCE SEA NO.: 89101.06 Bob: The attached is a draft of the subdrain details for Lot 14, and also the special slab underlayment for this lot. The subdrain detail, Alternative B, on Plate A5, is that used for Lots 1 - 3 with the minimum depth increased to 5 ft. The plan view shows the suggested position of the subdrain and its discharge into the Inter box JAN 19 2001 Discharge srbdroin inb , east s de cf S DRS D-9 inlet structure - e, •„off t ,. I. i 14 3A r ✓ J / �n Drain pipe invert at S' below pad level See gllerr�te B on i` Of subo�ra,!rcjr data l i r 0 -200 �� M L�. ��. 2 % Tin slope ` SUBDRAIN LAYOUT Lot 14 - Cardiff Glen Encinitas, California N 619 - 449 -5824 SHEPAPDSON ENGR. B42 P03 JAN 02 '01 16:33 Backtill lied Drainage Parcel, t s000 or Slmllar 1 lack 1 6" ± Owr Plpe I -sled P.V.C. .Ipe - wrap Around Pipe 1%Slope min. Alternative, A No Boole / / 2.0 t.�FInUh Slope Properly Compacted Backtill / e!; 314" Crushed Rock Fnoapeulating Filter Al Fabric � Supoo 4 HP Or aq' Equivalent. i�a a 0 4e' a no Dlomelef Perforated P.V.C. PIPS. To Drain Q 1%min- Tlghtline Pip Or Discharge Down SIOP"Wr7 100 Ft.or Lou Alternative B bate: October, 1999 Project No: !91111 -04 Plate AmaSHEPARDSON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC SUBDRAIN DETAILS G.a.cAnirn(Co,u.4w: BrandyWne Project A5 Fnrinrnr- Geobrira Encinitas, Callfomia 9 619- 449 -5624 SHEPARDSON ENGR. I i i I � f I+ I f 1 I I I 1 , 1 , I� , 1 I 1 Lt _I 1.1 I i 642 PO4 JAN 02 101 16:33 Sheet Of i I 1 i I � f I+ I f 1 I 642 PO4 JAN 02 101 16:33 Sheet Of i I 1 y a G" w , , I , + 1 I s') ' ; fi� .C7%f Aire , I I / 1 1-4 1 I I , 1 , �IW SHFPARDS0N gM £NGiNEE NGAssocwreslnc. Pro+ect No. 4=/ —GL Prepared by ".1or Date Project . %fe C/�� Reviewed by Date Subject Cl 7- /4 ^.s /p6_4 62'r u o-.,c w.. ire 1' f y a G" w , , I , + 1 I s') ' ; fi� .C7%f Aire , I I / 1 1-4 1 I I , 1 , �IW SHFPARDS0N gM £NGiNEE NGAssocwreslnc. Pro+ect No. 4=/ —GL Prepared by ".1or Date Project . %fe C/�� Reviewed by Date Subject Cl 7- /4 ^.s /p6_4 62'r u o-.,c w.. ire ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ctty Of Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Encinitas Field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. 5L43 Cz.T Name of Project ,Z . Name of Developer Gq,tnirF �ux�.✓ �u.r Site Location (address ...number ... street name ...suffix) (IOU (bldg) I have inspected the grading at the subject site and have verified certification of the pad by the Engineer of Work, C Z;q4 dated -- -- and certification of soil compaction by the Soil Engineer, dated I am hereby satisfied that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, Chapter 23.24 of the Municipal Code, and any other applicable engineering standards and specific project requirements. Based on my observation and the certifications, I take no exception to the issuance of a building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading Is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public Improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if appropiate) Reference: Building Permit No. - -- (Date) (Date) Special Note: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork, when completed. Office staff will handle the appropiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. 1SG /fie Id3.doc I TEL 760 -633 -2600 1 FAX 76+0 -633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 TDD 760. 633.2700 1� recycled paper & ASSOCIATES, INC. P —f'... m1'6 fn, Co.,I" P.,MtK February 1, 2001 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Engineering, Planning, Environmental Sciences and Management Services Corporate Office: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 700.942.5147 Fax 760.632.0164 #2226 RE: Engineer's Certification for Cardiff Glen; Partial Bach Street Subgrade This letter is hereby submitted to address the subgrade for proposed Bach Street from Sta. 5 +25 to its Easterly terminus, which includes a cul -de -sac. I hereby state that grading for this street has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards. The average subgrade elevations are 0.03 feet higher than necessary to provide for the street section of 4 inches A.0 over 6 inches base. Very truly yours, Dudek & Associates, I C. Daniel C.Groth, P.E. .rh � M Pry /ru,ow( hnm•! • fom ➢!ex P. nreA February 1, 2001 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Engineering, Planning, Corporate Office: Environmental Sciences and 605 Third Street 760.942.5147 Management Services Encinitas, California 92024 Fax 760.632.0164 I= FEB 0 5 2001 #2226 RE: Engineer's Certification for Cardiff Glen; Partial Bach Street Subgrade This letter is hereby submitted to address the subgrade for proposed Bach Street from Sta. 5 +25 to its Easterly terminus, which includes a cul-de -sac. I hereby state that grading for this street has been completed in conformance with the approved plans and requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards. The average subgrade elevations are 0.03 feet higher than necessary to provide for the street section of 4 inches A.0 over 6 inches base. Very truly yours, �Duudekj& Associates, I Ci ( Daniel C.Groth, P.E. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT City Of Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Encinitas field Operations Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL TO: Subdivision Engineering Public Service Counter FROM: Field Operations Private Contract Inspection RE: Grading Permit No. Name of Project Li9wiff (S; /— Name of Developer ,eA,lD 1- 11Y/AAE Site Location (address ...number ... street name ._suffix) aot7 Vogl I have inspected the grading at the subject site and have verified certification of the pad by the Engineer of Work, Dv d/c e =1/7, dated e and certification of soil compaction by the Soil Engineer„ U& dated _/?_— IA—Z.�Co am hereby satisfied that the rough grading has been completed7 In accordance with the approved plans and specifications, Chapter 23.24 of the Municipal Code, and any other applicable engineering standards and specific project requirements. Based on my observation and the certifications, I take no exception to the issuance of a building permit for the lot(s) as noted or Phase , if any, but only in so far as grading is concerned. However, this release is not intended to certify the project with respect to other engineering concerns, including public road, drainage, water, sewer, park, and trail improvements, and their availability, any other public improvements, deferred monumentation, or final grading. Prior to final inspection of the Building Permit(s) and legal occupancy, I need to be further advised so that I can verify that final grading (i.e., finished precise grading, planting and irrigation) has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (Date) (Signature of Senior Civil Engineer, only if appropiated (Date) Reference: Building Permit No. - -- Special Nate: Submit this form, if completed, to counter staff merely by placing a copy of it in both engineering technicians' in- boxes. Please remember to do a final inspection of the grading permit and submit that paperwork when completed. Office staff will handle the apprupiate reductions in security, if any, and coordination with Building Inspection. Thank you. !SG /field3.doc I TEL 76"33-2600 1 FAX 760-633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Awnuc. Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 760 -633 -2700 1� recycled paper - SEP.. -27' OO(WED) 1044 MESA REALTY INC. TEL 619 297 7831 P.002 l�q ADDRESS LIST: EN c- �8 -�2g m "412 A E S 83 Vivaldi Street 71 Vivaldi Street M 55 Vivaldi Street 39 Vivaldi Street 23 Vivaldi Street 15 Vivaldi Street 09 Vivaldi Street Vivaldi Street 1504 Vivaldi Street M10 1510 Vivaldi Street 1518 Vivaldi Street 1534 Vivaldi Street 131501 1546 Vivaldi Street 14 1562 Vivaldi Street 15 356 Bach Street 16 348 Bach Street 17 421 Bach Street 18 433 Bach Street 19 1443 Bach Street 0 Bach Street 4 Bach Street 02 Gershwin Street 10 Gershwin Street W43(48ac 4 Gershwin Street 2 Gershwin Street 8 Gershwin Street Bach Street Bach Street EN c- �8 -�2g m "412 425 Santa Fe Drive Encinitas, CA 92024 July 19, 2001 Mr. Tim Barisic Brandywine Development 1801 E. Edinger Avenue, #125 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Sent Via Fax (714.558.2850) and Delivered to Site NScI Dear Mr. Barisic: I received your letter dated July 18, 2001; you failed to address the issues that I set forth in my letter dated July 17, 2001. Specifically, you made no mention of Brandywine's obligations concerning the paving of the access road as well as the reimbursement for the temporary fence that was necessitated by the dangerous condition your firm created. To address your letter, you stated that Brandywine is "desirous of utilizing access ways other than our current easement through your property ... ". This issue has been explained to you time and time again. You have no easement rights beyond Raspy Growers. It is also arguable that you extinguished any easement rights to the road from Santa Fe Drive by your actions of installing the fence, thus preventing its use. Therefore, you are trespassing. You also state that your actions are necessitated by the actions of the City of Encinitas. The City has no authority to unilaterally change the property rights of an individual, nor has it ever given any notice of a desire to change such rights. I strongly doubt the City would be willing to accept the consequences of such action, namely damages incurred to our crops as well as our business activities. This is not a game. I demand that you address the issue of the road as well as the fence. Due to your present as well as past actions, it seems the only appropriate remedy is to seek reimbursement now for the damages you have done. Please contact me at 760.753.2532, or fax a response to 760.632.1975. Until then, I reserve the right to protect our property rights and block the gap in the fence from our road. Sincerely, hn Hall Cc: City of Encinitas 425 Santa Fe Drive Encinitas, CA 92024 July 24, 2001 Engineering Department City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Dear Sir: InC75 1` AL Z i 200i c Enclosed is a letter that was forwarded to Brandywine Development. Please read the document since Brandywine states that the city mandated it using the access through the greenhouses which is trespassing. This is the case since they have no easement rights to their opening in the fence. Please address this issue. I may be contacted at the above address or by phone at 760 - 753 -2532.