The URL can be used to link to this page

2004-9192 G a k• `<�' # y F �a& srt r �� 'Fr y'ii-��t;' A }: �°i.� � Fl � i z-� ��°z ;a7 � � v PRO' �L. � �� a;x� � iy+? '�'cs• ��4� `e�� r� �' .,�� F1' �T�a.•�t:- '�,� � F � .�. n6 -?:� '�'F sits a as 1 A4, W jli�XC s ' x LN "-Tddd'3 s wjrisJ �} SSr ✓ �y. r*,,a: "`\ s" :£ �[fir �4��. 1 �.-i'� sl�'� gip. � h r"E re r.,,P:. Sys s� ,�'h - S -� k , # S ��`C e,=ti �A� f ♦ ,��3 -+. o•je • fve �LaL � 55 - ,•,�.^ 's ^x:'� y x`'13 �' E• ,Rtii d-' d h `"�?, r .fir t ! a� '^r�' `�� -j ��(�1,�C • � i' r'�.y,..ti� �, �-,��",pE��°�,�`a°ss'�,sa� .fig��4�.k�� E �.'.. 4aoe- -� �� h•�s have_ lae�► �� .:.�: �� _ - rA °max r � - 3� .. +rte� h � �� st'1�' x �r� •�.t `� �'�.�1 �- _ � _ .��; j'4° "`��F� �.t`".� 'x~ �,�# t CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: 'TELEPHONE: o zqa r` cam,. . Mkr= WAiuJeu At-4o J&HO E3QAnj Pr25e . Sole 041JO rrlcm N se-u ss C'e*r?o G-c+ Ears ct �i� Q c c y ,►xfctci • C�/c•( `.SPO�l� 5�&� ClnCtt�/��r�l err, /11�s Z 7 U� </h/0a27r � STt32T 7Z)0�, X4-5 U 9` 4lh , ffcr�v.7- 2 8 os A2C ZvneT ow o o s /haJox- 6e.,W1•t1(-- Wo,.j c69m�J/G Z /!CGS o.k . t �l6�N av� i2ovLH G�2�+r�i,J�, 4Lc, 1,400A ' /1/2//051 ileclef r)e/'9 egmp aA .7106ut efe)-f 4ts hC c� rj fe is . "lle 6 ,7F- . C -1-Yt, 7L iS ua�•fcd ��nC�/ /04 /n `C v,5/mss 9tS'--�8 uiC j3 > 2:/ n~-s tD be Ski �roSS bhe ef CAaS hfev 4p he i,7 . ,4s- g vo?vll n Comet /�7�ft�- �'ltPdec✓. ��t�orrrn�ib✓� Z ' �/-�f Awe W cE cCere S/7F FV4 r7Abfi. • ieev - zA-v6o C&-P-7-. l o Di /4P7-i.J olPd TOSS /,12ocr z5U,alrs�s�) 05,-5howr7 ov. !Olor7 "7b r•�o �� c(.'ssaj�.+fbr. /�r��C7 i55.�/'11r � , j, 3 x l/ ✓gip-:. ed 9r"s--14ned sw ale-s en d,,ss,•p•-tars . Z)I r'f !!P [O( tC S`rgt�e7-• a ffo w O CCv n A10 na( ar S'e�jr� /'eleas e amp( aas-kour ffs art Gott , /o-09fo Ccti IZW7 dC -b c�c e zmv ACV -741p7e� od-�-`ly, weet'-. m14429 'I,L)E L)C N tiCA, 221 2 C, I �N i ',A H Recording Requested by: M J N rY I4 CC �_�U L R City Engineer N j,�o AL 4 'L. When Recorded Mail To : !t City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 SPAC. COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY WAIVER OF PROTEST TO ASSESSMENTS Assessor' s Parcel Work Order 1533-G Number: 254-262-22 Project 02-263 ADR, CDP A. William Kyle Martin and Rosanna Alvarado-Martin, ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows : See Attachment "All which is attached hereto and made a part hereof . B. In consideration of 04-153 CDP, OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: No protest shall be made by the owners to any proceedings for the installation or acquisition of street improvements, including undergrounding of utility lines, under any special assessment 1911 or the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 , or any other applicable state or local law, and whether processed by the City of Encinitas or any other governmental entity having jurisdiction in the matter and for the purposes of determining property owners support for same . C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties . D. OWNER agrees that OWNER' s duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY . Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant . E. If either party is required to incurs costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorney' s fees, from the other party. F. Failure of the OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant . G. Upon OWNER' s satisfaction of OWNER' s duties and obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and CITY shall execute a "Satisfaction of Covenant" . H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant , the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: / OWNER VV� W William KJ71e Martin Dat osanna Alvarado-Martin Date (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached) CITY OF CIN±TAS- Dated .� by (Notarization not required) Peter Cota--Robles, Director of Engineering Services Attachment `A' Legal Description of Real Property APN 260-302-06 Lot 16 , Block 105 of Cardiff Vista, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, According to Map thereof No. 1547 , filed in the Office of the County Recorder, San Diego County, March 18 , 1913 . CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of r�-L z f County of - On / ,� Yl _-)oo Y before me, DATE NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER-L.G.,'JANE DOE OTARY PUBLIC- personally appeared L,), NAME(S)OF SIGNER(S) ❑ personally known to me - OR -,roved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)CLisl6re subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that Ei Ohe/they executed the same in N�er/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by i-is er/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. RUBY P WITNESS my hand and official seal. COMII.P141IM2 rTl s Notary Public-Calffomia (A r W SAN DIEGO COUNTY My Comm.Exp.May 8,2008 SI41ATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHEg DOCU�0IENT INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER !' ITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENTITY(IES) SIGNER(S)OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of—(, �V County of On I � :�_(kw > .-:7.,c, before me, DATE ' NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER-E.G.,"JAME DOE,NOTARY PUBLIC" personally appeared NAME(S)OF SIGNERS) ❑ personally known to me - OR -.roved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) 4sbare subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he&h- hey executed the same in hisier` heir authorized capacity(ies), and that by hislWtheir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. RUBY P.WILKS COMM.#1487732 m WITNESS my hand and official seal. V) Notary PubNc-Califomia Ca W SAN DIEGO COUNTY My Comm.Exp.May 8,2008 e IGNATURE OF NOTARY x4l y ; 1� OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT 0 INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER _? TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT TITLE(S) ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED El GENERAL ': :a ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENnTY(IES) SIGNER(S)OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE ' cr I~ Recording Requested By, ) �/�L umom«i CF /"/� ooCu�s^�r ' ��s�cco�oEooN w[mZ2uou4 City Engineer ) oo�um�mlwuwaEn 20C14-1 111316 When Recorded Mail To: } , �� ms/+�'/)`.mr` opHCE City Clerk ) rnNIE « )a Pm City ofEncinitas \ 5O5 South Vulcan Avenue \ Encinitas, C/\ S2O24 ) 8P/\{ COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR DRAINAGE Assessor's Parcel Planning Case: 04-153 CDP N Work Order: A VVi)|iarn Kyle Martin and Rosanna Alvarado-Martin, (''C)VVNER'' hereinafter) is the owner of real property which ie known ae ("PRC>PERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: EXHIBIT^/\''ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF;and B |n consideration o By the City of Encinitas ("CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit ofCITY, to do the following: SEE ATTACHMENT^B" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure tothe benefit of the future oxvnars, enournbroncare, ouoceasora, heina, personal repreaentodvee, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D C)VVNEFl agrees that OVVNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to rempond. CITY may odd to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of This Covenant. E If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. F. Failure of OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. ACCEPTED AND AGRE D: OWNER Ah W iam Ky e Marti Date Rosanna Alvarado-Martin Date (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached.) CITY OF ENCINITAS ,F o Dated � -, ' by (Notarization not required) Peter Cota-Robles Director of Engineering Services Attachment 'A" Legal Description of Real Property APNs 260-302-06 Lot 16, Block 105 of Cardiff Vista, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, According to Map thereof No. 1547, filed in the Office of the County Recorder, San Diego County, March 18, 1913. ATTACHMENT B TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR DRAINAGE PROJECT NO. 9192-G OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS 1. For claims that are alleged to have arisen, directly or indirectly, from drainage or runoff associated with the PROPERTY or the plans, design, construction or maintenance of OWNER' s improvements, OWNER unconditionally waives all present and future claims against CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees, and agents. This waiver does not apply to claims that are alleged to have arisen out of the sole, active negligence or deliberate wrongful act of CITY. 2. It is further understood and agreed that all of OWNER'S rights under §1542 of the Civil Code of, the State of California and any similar law of any state or territory of the United States are hereby expressly waived. 9 1542 reads as follows: 1542. Certain claims not affected by general release. A general release does not extend to claims, which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor. 3. OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of OWNER or OWNER's agents, employees, subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives. Upon demand, OWNER shall, at its own expense, defend CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all such liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs. OWNER' s obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the plans, specifications and design of the improvements; but does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of a defect in the plans, specifications or design that is a result of a change required by CITY to the OWNER's proposed plans, specifications or design so long as such change is objected to, in writing, by OWNER, and the writing is filed with the City Engineer more than ten days prior to the commencement of work. OWNER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the construction of the improvements; alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the improvements; alleged injury to persons or property; and any alleged inverse condemnation of property as a consequence of the design, construction, or maintenance of the improvements. By approving the improvement plans, specifications and design or by inspecting or approving the improvements, CITY shall not have waived the protections afforded herein to CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents or diminished the obligation of OWNER who shall remain obligated in the same degree to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless as provided above. OWNER's obligation herein does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of the CITY's intentional wrongful acts, CITY's violations of law, or CITY's sole active negligence. 4. OWNER hereby agrees not to develop in any manner the PROPERTY except as authorized by CITY's ordinances and then only in accordance with issued permits. Among other things, but without limitation, this shall prohibit the alteration of landforms, removal of vegetation and the erection of structures of any type, except as permitted or authorization by CITY. 5. This Covenant does not Preclude OWNER taking emergency, protective measures as approved by CITY. CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of County ofK On �I c6 before me, DATE NAME,TITLE OF OFFICER-E.G.,'JANE DOE/NOTARY PUBLIC' personally appeared NAME(S)OF SIGNER(S) ❑ personally known to me - OR - JI—p-roved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s),&.Dare subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that tfie/$he/they executed the same in fj�ijih er/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by der/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. RUBY P.vY1LKS WITNESS my hand and official seal. CO Mm.#i4sT732 M Notary Public-calft-la (—A -� to SAN DIEGO COUNTY T- My Comm.ESP.May 8,2008 '�"�► 4IGNATURE OF NOTARY OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT INDIVIDUAL ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER - ,��'� TITLE(S) TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED _ ❑ GENERAL ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENTrrY(IES) SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT E State of '� County of On y before me, ),. J'�(�� DATE AAME,TITLE OF OFFICER'-E.G.,'JANE DOE,40TARY PUBLIC" personally appeared NAME(S)OF SIGNER(S) ❑ personally known to me - OR -- proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s);1 lire subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that h sheT ey executed the same in his4!1e�jAheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by hiskK-e-rAbeir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. RUBY P.VWLKS WITNESS m MOW CONIM.#1487732 m y h and and official seal. Notary Public-CalHomia SAN DIEGO COUNTY Comm.UP.may e,2oo8 SIGNXTURE OF NOTARY LG�y OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT E INDIVIDUAL ��' �,_,. �/x 2= � � i;/z, ❑ CORPORATE OFFICER I Tnu(s) TOLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT ❑ PARTNER(S) ❑ LIMITED ❑ GENERAL I=6 ❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT NUMBER OF PAGES ❑ TRUSTEE(S) ❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑ OTHER: DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S)OR ENTITY(IES) SIGNER(S)OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE A M.'Pf •, '.. Y I UC _v flrw"^ _ } � YJ fi December 6, 2004 City of Encinitas 501 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92007 ATTN: STEPHANIE KELLAR RE: 1702 GLASGOW—CDP 04-153 —IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (DRIVEWAY) Dear Stephanie, The existing driveway had an impervious surface area of 652.1 sf, and the proposed driveway has an impervious surface area of 741.5sf. Therefore the net increase in impervious driveway area is 89.4sf. If you have any comments or concerns, or if you require any exhibits, please feel free to contact me at the number noted below. Very truly yours, Michael H. Smith, RCE 65090 P L H. '9 WNW ` DEC 6 EIrG��`-�F1t1eU S"�'IT AS r��Y OF EN� 535;forth Hu-v, 101, Suite v' Solana Beach. (A 920'5 (55S-_59-2.5101 rhvmancmirhnrny nar ' MA P,x f �'.� �" e�� I`' s py November 18, 2004 _� City of Encinitas D E C E p/U ER9n 501 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92007 W ATTN: STEPHANIE KELLAR ENG"J'EET ;G SF�''!CE C!"y OF ESNC!""7AS RE: 1702 GLASGOW—CDP 04-153 —HYDROLOGY Dear Stephanie, The purpose of this letter is to formally address the hydrology and hydraulics of the above mentioned site as it relates to the proposed redevelopment. The overall site drainage is overland, and flows downhill from east to west. In the existing condition all surface water is allowed to flow in and over vegetated areas across the subject property. To the best of my knowledge, no offsite drainage impacts the subject property. The overall amount of impervious area in the post re-developed is 3,011 sf, as compared to an existing impervious area of 2,498sf.. This is an increase of 513 sf of impervious area. The detention requirements are 25.65 cf of storage (513sf X 0.05ft). The proposed re-development plan proposes to control the drainage by the use of grass lined swales. These swales as depicted on the plan will intercept, contain and convey storm flows from east to west along the side of the new dwelling to a rip-rap protected discharge point. From these discharge points, the storm flows will be allowed to resume their natural sheet flow condition prior to crossing the subject properties boundary. It is my opinion that the grass lined swales will provide enough infiltration to mitigate the need for additional detention facilities caused by the increase in impervious surface of 513 sf. If you have any comments or concerns, or if you require any calculations, please feel free to contact me at the number noted below. a FEU,® Very tpjk yours, Michael H. Smith, RCE 65090 Noa 535,Forth Hip a. 101, Suite G Solana Beach. (,A 920'7 b58-259-2 5101 themapsmith(0cox.net LIMITED GEOTECIINICAL EVALUATION For Proposed Martin Residence 1702 Glasgow Avenue Cardiff, California Prepared For Mr. & Mrs. Kyle Martin 1702 Glasgow Avenue Cardiff, California 92007 Phone: (619) - 417-4636 Date: 20 October 2004 Document No. : 204111 IG Prepared By: Consulting E gineers, Inc. ***A ]-Stop Firm for all Earthly Engineering Needs • 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D • LAGUNA HILLS, CA. 92653 • PHONE: (949) 768-4466 • FAX : (949) 768-0735 ♦CIVIL ENGINEERING ♦GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING •LAND PLANNING&GEODESIGN n � ♦ENGINEERING GEOLOGY •SOIL&WATER CONTAMINATION �V ♦ENVIRONMENTAL •SURVEYING Consulting gineers,Inc. ♦MATERIAL TESTING&INSPECTION •STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ♦EARTHQUAKE&DISTRESS STUDIES ♦ PHONE (949)768-4466 1 FAX (949)768-0735 1 E-MAIL LotusEngrs@aol.com 20 October 2004 Document No. 204111 IG Mr. &Mrs. Kyle Martin 1702 Glasgow Avenue Cardiff CA 92007 Subject: Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardiff, California Dear Mr. &Mrs. Martin: Pursuant to your request and authorization, we are pleased to present this Limited Geotechnical Report on the above captioned project. The purpose of the report is to determine subsurface conditions and present findings and recommendations based on limited field exploration, laboratory testing and analysis. Furthermore, the report provides parameters for earthwork, foundations and other geostructural elements. 1_0 SCOPE OF WORK ♦ Visual site reconnaissance and geotechnical mapping ♦ Shallow(4'maximum depth) subsurface exploration, sampling and logging ♦ Laboratory testing and analysis ♦ Review of available published and Client provided documents ♦ Project meeting and conferences with project principals ♦ Engineering calculations and geotechnical analysis ♦ Development of Seismic Parameters ♦ Consultation with Project Architect 2PREPARATION OF THE REPORT PLUS ATTACHMENTS LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ■ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 ■ Mr. &Mrs. Kyle Martin 20 October 2004 Document No. 204111 IG Page 2 [Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardiff, California] 2.0 REFERENCE 2.1 Steven D. Weber, Architect -Project Plans (Site Plan, BMP/Drainage Plan& Storm Water Quality Notes & Infiltration Pit Detail, Proposed 2 Story Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardif, Ca, undated received via e-mail 2.2 California Department of Mines & Geology - Mines & Mineral Resources of San Diego County, California, County Report 3 (1963) 2.3 CDMG (1997) - Maps of Known Active Faults Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada, Published by ICBO (1998) 2.4 CDMG (1990) - Planning Scenario for a Major Earthquake, San Diego - Tijuana Metropolitan Area, Special Publication 100 2.5 UBC 1997 Edition 3.0 PLANNED IMPROVEMENT The existing 900 story square feet residence along with the garage and driveway will be demolished and a new two story 2300 square feet residence with garage and driveway will be built in its place. Other ancillary improvements will comprise of drainage improvements including BMP's to comply with Clean Water Act, and other flatwork. 4.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The property is located on the west side of Glasgow Avenue, about 1000 feet north of Birmingham Drive, a westerly exit on 15 Freeway South in the City of Cardiff, San Diego County, California(See Figure 1, Site Vicinity Map). The property is bounded by existing residences to the north, south and west, Glasgow Avenue to the east. The lot's topography is fairly flat with a maximum elevation differential of 4 feet from the east to west. The building pad is situated about 3 feet above the street LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ■ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 ■ Mr. &Mrs. Kyle Martin 20 October 2004 Document No. 204111 IG Page 3 [Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardiff, California] elevation. The average on-site elevation is about 200 feet MSL (mean sea elevation). The south, north and west property lines are traversed by property line fences. A 900 square feet (±) residence with concrete driveway on the south side and a concrete patio on the west side exists on the site. The concrete flatwork although cracked is serviceable. The other on-site improvements comprise of trees and other landscape. The drainage is fair, partly infiltrates into the ground and partly flows to the street in an easterly direction. 5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS In order to assist in defining the existing subgrade conditions two (2) exploratory hand pits were excavated by the owner's representative(Mr. John Brady). The exploratory trenches measured 2 feet wide by 6 feet long and 4 feet deep with steps at 2 foot vertical interval. One pit was located on the east side (TP-1) and the other pit (TP-2) was located on the north side of the rear patio slab. On the morning of our site inspection (10/08/04), it was noted that the test trenches were covered with ply wood sheets with earth on top for safety reasons. Probing the bottom of the holes indicated that the subgrade was compact and a half inch steel probe could only go about 2 inches maximum into the ground. Nuclear gauge tests were taken 2 feet and 4 feet depths in Test Pit #1 & # 2. In addition, drive tubes samples were also obtained from both the Test Pits at similar depths. Bulk samples representative of encountered materials were also obtained. The exposed subgrade materials comprise of top soil within the upper 6-8 inch zone, followed by red brown, medium to fine, moderately dense, slightly plastic silty sand with very low expansive characteristics (with an expansive index of 12). The exposed site features were mapped and representative subsurface samples (bulk and relatively undisturbed) were obtained for laboratory testing and analyses. The approximate locations of test pits and other geotechnical data are shown on Figure 3 (Geotechnical Plan). Field density tests were also conducted and their results are summarized on the Attached Summary of Field Density Tests, Table I. LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ■ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 ■ Mr. &Mrs. Kyle Martin 20 October 2004 Document No. 204111 IG Page 4 [Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardiff, California] In general, the subject site is underlain by a thin, localized veneer of unspecified fill (Af) overlain by a thick sequence of partially consolidated terrace sediments (Qt) of Quaternary origin(See Geologic Vicinity Map, Figure 2) The upper localized and undifferentiated fill soils consisted of native soils containing various landscape materials such as grass and compost. The fills are classified as silty sands with a very low expansion potential and loose to slightly dense in relative density to a maximum depth of 8 inches. Free ground water was not encountered in either of the test holes that extended to a depth of 4 feet. 6.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY No evidence of active faults was observed in our test pit exposures or has been documented within the immediate vicinity of the property. Based on historical data, ground rupture due to active faulting is not foreseen. The closest active fault (i.e., causative fault) is the Rose Canyon Fault, a southerly extension of Newport-Inglewood Fault (See Figures 4& 5). The maximum credible earthquake for the fault is an M=6.9 event. The reference document (Reference 2.3, attached Figure 5), indicates that the fault is located approximately 1 mile southwest of the site. Other potential active faults include: the Elsinore and San Andreas. In any event, a large earthquake generated as a result of movements along the Rose Canyon or Newport-Inglewood Faults mentioned above, together with other known active faults farther away from the subject site, would probably cause ground shaking at the site with an estimated repeatable acceleration range of 0.20g to 0.40g (g= acceleration due to gravity). This estimation of acceleration is based on the theory that the effect of shock waves released from an origin (epicenter) is inversely proportional to the distance to the point of LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ■ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 ■ Mr. &Mrs. Kyle Martin 20 October 2004 Document No. 204111 IG Page 5 [Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardiff, California] interest (subject site). The degree of attenuation is dependent upon the type of traversing wave,the depth of bedrock, medium materials properties, etc. 7.0 LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL AND SEISMIC PARAMETERS Based on the referenced document (Reference 2.4, attached Figure 4), the site is not located within a seismically induced liquefaction potential area and/or landsliding. Granular and fine to medium grained materials encountered below a depth of 1 foot during this investigation appear to exhibit moderate relative densities. Hence, the site should experience moderate adverse effect due to high ground shaking. Conventional wood frame construction and adequately reinforced masonry/concrete structures, built in conformance with applicable current building codes, are expected to perform satisfactorily, and should experience only nominal to moderate damage. The current building code adapted by the building industry is 1997 UBC. The following seismic parameters may be used in the structural design. Parameter Table Symbol Factor/Formula Seismic Zone Factor 16-I Z 0.4 Soil Profile Type 16-J -- Sp Seismic Coefficient 16-Q Ca 0.44 Na 16-R C" 0.64 N, Near-Source Factor 16-S N. 1.0 16-T N,, 1.6 Seismic Source Type -- -- B Note: Newport - Inglewood Fault (Type B) is about a mile from the site with a Slip Rate SR= 1.5 mm per year and Maximum Moment Magnitude M=6.9 LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ■ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 ■ Mr. &Mrs. Kyle Martin 20 October 2004 Document No. 204111 IG Page 6 [Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardiff, California] 8.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 General 8.1.1. The site is geotechnically suitable for the proposed residential development provided the conclusions and recommendations of this report are incorporated into the project plans and specifications. Furthermore, the project should comply with other special requirements of the State, County and City. 8.1.2. The site is located in a region that has major active faults and subject to moderate to major seismic disturbances during the project life. Specifically, it is in close proximity to Rose Canyon Faults and the Newport-Inglewood(1 mile southwest). The structure shall be built in conformance with the current applicable building codes. 8.1.3. The site is not located within an area of seismically induced liquefaction potential and/or landsliding. Also, as the property is underlain by well consolidated terrace sediments,the adverse effects due to dynamic subsidence are considered minimal. 8.1.4. The on-site soils are very low in expansion as substantiated by laboratory tests. 8.1.5. The existing one-story house is supported by perimeter footing and interior post footings. The depth of the perimeter footing and other footings are not known. The residence will built more than twenty years ago, has performed fairly well without evidence of major distress features. 8.2 Grading and Earthwork 8.2.1. Based on the review of the project plans,there will be no major grading operations on the site, except for creation of a ndw building pad after demolition. The on-site earthwork would be limited to removal and recompaction of the upper 2 foot zone that would be disturbed due to demolition of the existing residence and its associated improvements. LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ■ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 ■ Mr. &Mrs. Kyle Martin 20 October 2004 Document No. 204111 IG Page 7 [Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardiff, California] 8.2.2. In order to provide satisfactory foundation support, the exposed footing excavation bottom shall be tested for a minimum relative compaction of 90% per ASTM D1557-94 or current. The footing subgrade to a minimum depth of 12 inches should be redensified by mechanical means, if the relative recompaction is less than 90%. Alternatively, a 12-inch overexcavation and 2 sack cement slurry replacement will suffice. 8.2.3. The subgrade of any new or removed/replaced slabs shall be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction at 115 to 120 percent of optimum moisture content per ASTM D1557-94 or current. 8.2.4. All structural fill (existing or proposed) shall exhibit at least 90 percent relative compaction in accordance with ASTM D1557-94 or current. 8.2.5. All imported materials should be granular, non-expansive, clean, non-contaminated, and approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to use. 8.2.6. All excavated soils with an organic content (leaves, roots, grass, etc.) of more than 0.5 percent by volume cannot be used as fill materials. 8.3 Utility Trench Backfill Backfills of all the utility trenches shall be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent, based on ASTM D1557-94 or current. The existing native soils may be used for trench backfill. 8.4 Grading/Earthwork Observation and Testing 8.4.1. The on-site geotechnical work, and installation of geostructural elements (i.e.; footings, slab subgrade, utility trench backfill, etc.) shall be observed, tested and verified by the geotechnical engineer for compliance with UBC Sections 3317 & 3318, geotechnical recommendations made in the soils report and per the City of Cardiff/Encintas Excavation and Grading Codes. LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ■ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 ■ Mr. &Mrs. Kyle Martin 20 October 2004 Document No. 204111 IG Page 8 [Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardiff,California 8.5 Site Drainage 8.5.1. All the completed drainage (roof and area waters) shall drain away from structural improvements to approved discharge facilities towards the street in a non-erodible manner. Best Management Practices(BMP's) proposed on the plan can be utilized.No ponding shall be allowed anywhere on the property. 8.5.2. The use of planters without sealed bottoms and sides or deep rooted long laterally spreading trees in the immediate 10-foot vicinity of structural improvements (structure, slab, hardscape, etc.) shall not be permitted. 8.6 Foundations Recommendations 8.6.1. The proposed residence can be supported on shallow footings, provided that the subgrade shall be tested for minimum 90 % relative compaction and 110 to 120 % of optimum moisture content or reworked as recommended in Sections 8.2.2 and 8.2.3 of Grading recommendations. The following geotechnical parameters may be used in the design of foundations, slabs and walls. 1. Soil Bearing Capacity(in compacted = 1200 psf (minimum 12 inch wide by 12 inch fill or approved native) deep) Bearing Capacity increase =250 psf for 6 inch width and 300 psf for 6 inch depth increase to a maximum bearing capacity of 4000 psf 2 Active Pressure (E.F.D.) = 36 pcf(static level backfill) =42 pcf(seismic, level) 3 Passive Pressure (E.F.D.) =250 pcf(compacted soil/native) 4 Friction Coefficient = 0.4 (between soil&concrete) Note: E.F.D. Denotes Equivalent Fluid Density; all retaining walls shall be adequately water proofed and provided with back drainage using French drains and granular backfill to transport sub surface water off site. LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ■ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 ■ Mr. &Mrs. Kyle Martin 20 October 2004 Document No. 204111 IG Page 9 [Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardiff, California 8.6.2. Foundation= Shallow footings (for one and two stories) ♦ Stem Wall / Continuous Footing = Minimum 15-inch wide by 24-inch deep (for 2 story residence), reinforced with minimum two #4 bars (one @ top and one @ bottom). ♦ Post footing/pad footing = seated at a minimum depth of 24 inches below subgrade. ♦ Isolated Footing (in landscape area) = seated at least at a depth of 30 inches below lowest surrounding grade. ♦ Fence-wall footing = minimum 12-inch wide by 18-inch deep, reinforced with two #4 bars(top and bottom) or per structural design. 8.6.3. Slab-On-Grade The on-site subgrade soils are considered to be very low in expansion characteristics as substantiated by the laboratory test (Figure 8) and as observed in the field. The following recommendations may be used in the design of floor slabs, flatwork and other slab-on-grade construction: Minimum slab thickness = 4 inches (actual), reinforced with#4 bars spacing at 24 inches on center each way. Sufficient expansion and construction joints should be provided. Where there are carpet or tile paving, or moisture migration by capillary raise to be mitigated, the slab should be underlain by 10 mil Visqueen membrane with 2-inch clean sand above and 2 inch clean sand below the sheet to prevent moisture migrating upwards. 8.7 Concrete Requirements It is recommended that Type V cement be used for the concrete in contact with on-site soils. The concrete shall have a minimum compressive strength of 2500 psi at LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ■ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 ■ Mr. &Mrs. Kyle Martin 20 October 2004 Document No. 204111 IG Page 10 [Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardiff, California] 28-day break and a maximum water cement ratio of 0.50 or as specified by the structural engineer. 8.8 Corrosion Protection For attaining a long lasting service life of plumbing lines, it is recommended that all underground utility lines shall be of chemically inert materials or be coated/wrapped by approved anti-corrosive paint/membrane. 8.9 Static Settlement It is anticipated that a total post construction settlement due to structural loads will be within a tolerable limit of less than 1 inch. The differential settlements is not expected to exceed 0.1 foot for a horizontal distance of 20 feet. 990 LIMITATIONS AND CLOSURE The testing/inspections and consultations provided are instruments of service. Between exploratory excavations and/or field testing locations, all subsurface deposits consequent of their non-homogeneous, anisotropic and heterogeneous characteristics can and will vary in many important geotechnical properties. The results presented herein are based on the inspections/testing at the approximate locations on the dates requested by the owners or their agents, on the information in part furnished by others and as generated by this firm, and represent our best interpretation of that data gathered to date. The conclusions and recommendations expressed therein are our professional opinions about the pertinent project geotechnical parameters which influence the understood site use and vice-versa; therefore, no warranty or guarantee is herein expressed or implied. The report is issued for the benefit of the owner and/or client. It shall be the owner's/client's responsibility to read, understand and implement the report LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ■ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 ■ Mr. &Mrs. Kyle Martin 20 October 2004 Document No. 204111 IG Page 11 [Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardiff, California] recommendations. No assurance is given that the report will be approved by the concerned government agency(ies). However, the report contents will be updated and/or response will be provided at additional scope and cost, as needed. All findings are subject to field modifications as more subsurface exposures (lateral and vertical) become available for evaluations. No modifications or alterations shall be made to the site unless evaluated from a geotechnical and civil engineering viewpoint. The report is issued and is valid on the condition that all recommendations are complied with in the field and verified by the geotechnical consultants. The site shall be adequately maintained and be geotechnically inspected at least once a year for verifying continued project stability and for follow-up recommendations as needed. A copy of this and prior reports shall be passed on to each of the successive property owners so that geotechnical recommendations for maintenance and upkeep of the project are complied with for continued stability. LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. is not responsible for any financial (or time related) gains or losses accrued by persons/firms or third party from this project. 10.0 NOTICE TO THE OWNER/CLIENT. ALL SUCCESSOR OWNERS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND USERS OF THIS REPORT This limited report was prepared as an information document by the undersigned as a professional services and should not be construed as an insurance policy or guarantee against future instability. Interested parties are hereby cautioned that this report renders opinions based on the field investigation, laboratory testing, and interpretation of reference data and physical conditions readily evident at the site and proximity at the present time, and does not predict future events and conditions that may affect the property. Moreover, it does not imply knowledge of all planes and strata of weakness and other potentially problematic conditions that may be present in the earth materials at the site between and beyond and below the exploratory borings or tests or inspection points. LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ■ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 ■ Mr. &Mrs. Kyle Martin 20 October 2004 Document No. 204111 IG Page 12 [Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Martin Residence, 1702 Glasgow Avenue, Cardiff, California] Any person using (authorized or unauthorized) or referencing this report for whatever reasons shall be bound by the Standard Terms & Conditions relating to the services that are being provided by the geotechnical consultants. These Standard Terms & Condition's (ST&C) for the User(s) of the report are being provided as Exhibit B. The ST&C shall be applicable to each and every section of the report, all phases of the project, to all persons using or referencing any or all sections of the report for technical, construction or legal purposes and shall continue to be in effect in perpetuity. The ST&C shall be deemed to be a part and pre-empts all current and subsequent phases or services that are being provided or legal actions that arise from the project. Thank you for this opportunity to be of professional service. If you have any questions, please call at your earliest convenience. Q�aFESS/ V. RAG�9 Respectfully submitted, LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. No. GE000705 Exp. By: Sampath V. Raghavan Principal Geotechnical Engineer G.E. 705 (Exp. 3-31-2007) Attachments: Summary of Field Density Tests, Table I Site Vicinity Map, Figure 1 Geological Vicinity Map, Figure 2 Geotechnical Plan, Figure 3 Planning Scenario for a Major Earthquake, Figures 4. Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones, Figure 5 Unified Soil Classification System, Figure 6 Laboratory Compaction Test, Figure 7 Laboratory Expansion Test, Figure 8 Laboratory Direct Shear Test, Figure 9 Guidelines for Flatwork Construction, Figure 10 Distribution: Project Architect, Steve Weber (3) via mail [SVR jvr Dawn[Lotws workpmUU2041 I I4g) LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ■ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ■ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 ■ * * * SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY & MOISTURE CONTENT TESTS TEST DATE APPROXIMATE DEPTH REF OMC MDD IMC IDD �RMC RC Remarks S D N NO. 2004 LOCATION B.E.G. CURVE C T G ( See Plan) (feet) M (Pcf) M (Pcf) M M 1 10/08 Test Pit-1 -2.0 A 8.0 132 5.6 107 70 81 Native X 2 10/08 -4.0 A 8.0 132 11.4 102 143 77 Native X 3 10/08 Test Pit-2 -2.0 A 8.0 132 3.4 98 43 1 74 Disturbed Native X 4 10/08 -4.0 A 8.0 132 3.7 109 46 1 83 Native X 5 10/08 Test Pit-1 -2.0 A 8.0 132 6.3 112 79 85 Native X 6 10/08 -2.0 A 8.0 132 6.1 106 76 80 Native X 7 10/08 -4.0 A 8.0 132 8.1 108 101 82 Native X 8 10/08 -4.0 A 8.0 132 7.7 115 96 87 Native X 9 10/08 Test Pit 1 1-4' A 8.0 132 5.4 68 0 Moisture Only 10 10/08 Test Pit-2 -2.0 A 8.0 132 4.8 114 60 86 Native X 11 10/08 -2.0 A 8.0 132 2.5 109 31 83 Native X 12 10/08 1 4.0 A 8.0 132 2.9 99 36 75 Disturbed Native X 13 10/08 -4.0 A 8.0 132 4.1 102 51 77 Native X 14 10/08 Test Pit-2 1-4' A 8.0 132 3.7 46 0 Moisture Only 15 10/08 DIVO DIVO X 16 DIVO DIVO X 17 DIVO DIVO X 18 DIVO DIVO X 19 DIVO I DIV01 X i i Where: OMC = Optimum Moisture Content &MDD = Maximum Dry Density based on ASTM Method D1557-91 IMC = Insitu Moisture Content& IDD = Insitu Dry Density : RMC = Relative Moisture Content RC = Relative Compaction : SC = Sand Cone , DT= Drive Tube, NG = Nuclear Gage, DR= Driven Ring B.E.G. = Below Existing Grade Lotus Consulting SITE: Proposed Martin Residence APPLIED 1702 Glasgow Avenue Engineers, Inc. Cardiff Ca 92007 EARTH 23112 Alcalde Dr., Suite D, SCIENCES PROJECT NO. : DATE TABLE Laguna Hills, Ca. 92653 204111 20 October 2004 1 Phone: (949)-768-4468 Fax : (949)-768-0735 I 4 51Te C;1: ! GEOLOGIC VICINITY MAP Solace: e-W01-M 1- MINES 4r fNt""Q1- R-E•s wQ e-&s SA o 0 4 SA.J b,M&vo-c- aO^-Vy,CTY f?fW15 Or t 963 Cocn=uMng ,lrac. J'VR FlQiWf 23112 Alcalds Dr., Ste C Laguna Hills, CA 92653 NO SCl4�lpf r w r a Encinitas yrmast 4 9 a o Santa Fe Dr Z •_ _...a� Santa Fe Dr 4 Surtvn>tt PI S 3 tv evw Rd ✓Q 3 z Cathy Ln ._Grange Hay Rd O Q ocean Crest Rd v' F A� DCcO Waoc9ax$0s Tom . v tJ .ot cdgove Dr o V, ¢+. Warvock Ave 31r Cara Dr r}ott>cySt a° +to, �. she ft id Ave 'i Benda Rd ;� S hidy a S: • ,e e Ave OrreRR Iknt9D a � � a. ❑` a e �L e. a C ardW IMF•The-Sea a Q n p N41 SITE VICINITY MAP NTS Source: NAp&%3 E.S"r.c-..bfri �RoPeg�p M,t►RTtNs/Diwtt.! DATE PROJECTNO. APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES /� j FOUNDATION ENGINEERING 1 `l b2 t.Ag�d1� Av !G4 -204111 oy Caeak� hr ENGINEERING GEOLOGY m CMLENGINEERING C"� ��t ��' GA BY«� a FIGURE 27114 ALCALDE DING.SINTEQ IAdMA IMlM G NIWI(41+�J}�t�-M!6 V V w � �-4TJ - i r Or c r a �O000 I -M' w 6z� m0 mmo r.O l?m D G1 1z q s.Y I -� ,r.. ;.(�. to Z x � :-,.Y.S.H. now I s X M x SLOPF k M/MIN. I--riyw f Concrots Patio Slab \ UJ 0 f DRAIN ' WRh,aarte►O,a)cracks z Z 0 O �1? x SLOPE FiN (U DRAINAGE � I cn co XIi (i'I C7 0 co • E R) rT{ y (.0 ?1 (V OG Oo Z c9 4 t ig In zConcrete Driveway x > Wlth aurnerou l rn s cracks m x • �+ 1 f+l O N)t.'D r— of M O V r— �rn En m z E C: z K z m - u, X m �_ 6� _--•- O i x w 10 V-- _ - - - -o- ------- a- 303 --- L=GO. 13' I 'T AT f'.ITS �EPos�'t'S APPLIED NCES Martin c FOUNDRING 1702 r Residenc:]tp- VK Aip, h"LE ENGINOGY Glasgow CIVIG Sow A GUNA MLL , Cardif ,fv, Ave CA g w u D O Gem;DOx - t _ m�>Zn° oz-Ix�Nr�7a> nc .z<'^> < mm Nara GLpaa> x> O�a r•+ -. Qp m>v n mZ `)• ,\ K-` -P-:- <y'•• C ;2mmm Z NN -GOm >ma2> <2mti_r2 p 1(fZyl rlCC- 2T (b .� 1�. - N � aacT2ay m gIm�~ 2�TN>O farr��>�> ^m Z� •~. 'G llt�, � 1 rb O J -'V z �' n oc�0r" com px ci p�,z, �mai o�c >a <p �mD l• f. ,a ;(.. J',4 r •t ' •� J 2 1••• <�iy ' aYGc , vCym�rGxa 8mrG��> -zic CO \ I ° TE. ii'[ --j Y , (J fll gy�my >r�r a>>° T�amD>:80 TNa tn8 yDV 3 �l o Dxc>an bmgArm��Trp r �z mimo �•t j � Gn rr,,9,y> -F Om 25r� y �> T y�D _ r Op_ Q er y a >p T6^r$_y $<�'^IG�S Pn 7x>t ; ��;f�� __��v >O��L7� N r�i ygmm � ZDD -- -f�alfY '�-_-.; .•. )�� = D 'zx,L; � '�r�y�m$ �^ >m Z OY <2 ' ' Y ,,_" "�v rtn,ea°f° cr P"`e9S o d w � vamm mamm z�$ >mz ,R Tzc nD s D $o° ooNZ�n �� 'g DOa aZa < =�w'i`e(,_ l �� ! z T D �mirls �m>mz ZR rz p x_>N mil- �1t5T� a >401 ° mOm -i <.y z / a3 a >_p >ac� -Fm_m�p �> ti z� s� � 1 .. _ ,�•� f)^. VE U C MZ Fn >aayF-i_7}S�t,Z� c ppm x 2m �-_` .,� Vim:N mmx<�mNT iN�T m n?a L11 .� ' rr -- `' 'l11 1lt Iw(1H y �� m _-� + k a /r{,,4 /+r ,�. _ �' .,q.•n �N h � rI` 4r e '�r �;,�. 1 'y 1. � � t o^ }��' .J { '�:�� l - f�'r�a�' ,-. i. _ �• 7 q.,�•,.'^, ,z d�` 4e�a- 'N �/ ,l 7..�� /' n r� „ f {.� 4 a r r rJ7 a � , fir,, l i � r t,• � E I r � � r � � � �, i' �' :' � I 'T r "' �'.1 , I !, Y '�� r � ,!'�`` ..,,. f; ! i;1"7� L' ! lc'-( r /r .Irt7+. < J•^,r :.� {��T;4.�..,f. t r ��0, - °rFtr ti1t1 f4 t• � r ;fir- x �yJ1 'L t ,�Yf... ..,F i' �I'� - , vw � 4'�*i'"•J Aj. .� f w-`,� r+ '''` `tv,lde,"^ *'c ,�- 4 `"..:.. .� ' �p,t ��'., "y� �� ':.. a'Y,' • rwt- � � 1- yyII r� l-he. � t, Ii: � 7 s 4i: a _, '� ',y .�i}f+ � _t� `,�� - �•7�' `,:,,. } M' r,motif: FS tiY' � r }ti��' �.}•'�'- ! Mf i 4 r�Ir '!:1' - ff/� tlf _.�i� �° ( s.Hp�^ � :f,t ,��, � ,� >Yw: tir. "�.• •^�. ,`�'I.= �r�' $ J'I l ,� •t. t.,,,,7�''- +. .�{_ � ,t}+', r:�. �"t ';',��, ��...k,� '+�#`', r� . ,*� .,j.,t ,.�'" 7 1kM. .�•J� J=I:f Y/. l e a. .,l JQ - \- ,f(-:Y, j I w.... +.'Pr,�� r ,tE " '.?,�•. �. .,,r'. �:,+;, +1 . ��' ,'•� y � N S'�`a '� �•? .J"�C�ka r '�u;�.7t� r�"',.,•:1`. �i• 'a, i '-'" �. ��.," .�(: a.�,. ,-�' �'1 a' t•'1f �.1 ��°"A aK F � 1/i M.' L ^,��.as `� 1'•4• lli 4r y Y ' ,,k R� y t, :.. i s i,A��-'� �y�s^j V:e„ .pi 4.- t #-r= of ,.• J ';y, y 4 a� ' � -f..� _.,! �f{,. � j��tr#L :�r'y"I t��%'t4: k n�.t'`� "� � .,;, !�%. ' +w_-^:.!',tj'�S ��' �' r•rl.,t•-4-:Tr. t >� , r , I /� /i r t > •-Z �Y r •,�. � r � l-7, ` f.2a�. woy.' y j' �r � � a� s i: � •/ � d ; 77 C jt { � Iw r. q � J�{ �k1,yl'� 1�° / t-.� � J �(' ;F_r_ 6, �c�'a' � i'v t� n �,y �t• ti�'7itrs v q -,n ... Y ) - , 'S,1'� � _ °'G 4 a� '*'. :i �3��\ 1'i:y�/4 .rC�., � ! %l ,,�•• µµ��! V�t �i•.rr'1.�'f rf� �s _ - �- .�,h,. � / �- 3j�r4�: � S"_{ , � "i,1';r � n/ � µfiat..•)_,'f/�A }=S. `�M„m,� � a� c_'1•,� ZC, �'r)”� n/`� ��,r,y ~� t �1..,� r Y,s.,•k -4 } ,/ ie (� + w .. � .. J /�./ >e.'.' T l., �y, /� �_ :' � off. .,� '..'r� �, y • �Jr I'fit I t a' � s�;,. r �� ' vX-*•/� \ � - �' yJ�`�r te'r'ry- � {*a I tt y r {.,7J.r��Ll Y^ ;� ti r� �-•j� � � ) �ylt�•.,•r� i ,<�� rf 1 �/` ��.,,�^Ui``'' l ;l �- Jhr (: , j o Y., J`r �"-, {�' SJi` r� h t .\f.. '_ �• ♦ ,! S{ �`y'. +yy�_/ ' Ia�{ - •/ ?, �� i�l,r� d s� ._/,�.1 •/'" �... �e•-Rbd� ',� ' . �� G.,�G �y•r� .1' '. .t}� a; �• � t,�,' 1 r� "M.� b~ �'1w`? /� .s / ',I` '�4„aa A i J .� �Jt .�X�•y`_ ''•� x/%4'pp•,,�� n! DUau °j�4 l '� \ rl '+,r �\. a,- � �� . .. ,y �,w t / 'C.rea ( r<a .N •� .fe., ..��'.. :• t` /7;�?' b `t f -/w• - m � F lii��" ;t, � ,��r7 �Y..b,.•nc� 1..- T" Y��y� {'r:•: J '4 ~ � i„f � r -1;/(.~� i/( - � 11GC.,,}1` ^^^444:.. .�- t•:.Yti�q_; T _ Y- I w:.l t`' ./'.a .,� �_ , �. I jl rt r.�` ,. ��`°tits F y�f��• t.3'fr �C{• �-. 7 � ��(�.�L 1i/ � 1, _ ___ �y ' 1 `� �(�/ / �7"' ty 1L7 1 r�� ,�3'✓MM� _"'� � `'�j? �/ `'�vr��.( ,1 I. i ..,j\ r T� r1` r ?]k w'ws.,o; `aY ? a•_ is / E: , F �'' S /{ "-K ,2 �. '�"•+do`s , ' 'r �;6-, .�!... `^0,�;•r/Q"_ i I• / , t p��+�J1� �7• ..;f.: „-I ,L.,.. 1 _ ,� i;' -' - -- I�..,- t� ll.._ fT 'Y -ctL � ;ti r mow! l� %. - �'-� `h' ��,3• 'At1F G F � � ''/�. s`. . ;j•- . r � I ��(t f' A teC ',y I l,_ l'F '`J r t.r •_. ^-•� f - _! r { �'1?T X' .Fps __r, rir! y� '`. 33° y p0, • .- .' n j nY '- •, - ! � r' Gnaw� �- ��p �r�7� ��e► )r� �,,1 } i�? y�,°arm :Y-yr- -r�•} j ;r,. /''_ /'� rF � ek�� {,' � :,1 ) - i.n,.(': t'� i, •� ! �:j f,..f` T' " l..' '.ly, c, .. >-. f f ,`f. T J /r1 f_ •�: 4��'!i r r.t 4yk ''� ,\'dt-.1 _,- `-i 1 ..`_ ,. y 1T /y ,/�.�..\ ', b,, / i... �,� 71 , +:, , .,a,�Y � ., ,. ,J �r � /' [ /.. r "f<-� 1. �,�,Fr J' /�r"'f[.,U.� {1 1�l +MX�•• ( r '�1. / ' 4.J: r 'I v.a .. ftlrq .,.0 ,�r� , on. �r , .�I n�( f ��,�/ / ,S?f{^i�• t � r., f �:.. {�",_� �,r }rti t.�� /r Y. 1:1� G _ 4� ,�t.4 I! � r /^/�1 w'�� L 1R /^��..^•.� rri. b�.�/y n 1.;;� ,i s t a � ¢t �i '�!' r` �'!^'`S a .: r ..i If rt ..r'.t ..t�,/, ,e f� .J tr { �r •'✓? 4 / I ' t l-i• +io ?.r• "rt,rf t` °' a-'r �+�� 4k;•4r � � 1 �„ y' 94k,tiy'. ,fit .i:.' � ' � r�# ;�`q yti ,� v `f�;,* r ' � ;�• �",� � � � 7 � Lkr .yT•t qG„MSSw ��,U '! .,z r rT '' �t�, ab"`':, S +�... d�'^t .J r ,{ 's i� q, s �:M � trs�rr� � w.+�` e a; r lu,•., t -Y y/ � ��:+ ,� . ''t ` i,^ �� ri<: r t.•'I ,F., -A G {( '. '` �, J/, ti� ' ' '�r3 ,/I� 1'I` �,)q[ft{rJ�/•/ .My,l L�t.� •• .: f .,� '' ,,'f� Y �� , ("+..e._�� /.' •,/j..• "awn - A... a r` :-; v .�••i •f ',x.,G.,o�,. r .,. .1r.•"Y ,'�1� �`� f.'�.i-' f' 74l�t/ ys ./,r,✓�T •'�1' '' I'v �* 1 . �f,! r� tyrG'=J` ....rt 1 561 or. _ sr...••LLLLLL fF �yrtt.' n,,.a,,/Mq r sd I - kC., i 4 J_, c��t`� 1"`� l �.1 't � - 7 •r rye. ��7{ 'fit�ti+Z�� r�c;N�Wt ¢L fi X��tt E C � � � tQ 4r ( �' �:-, �(�K-q _ r %:r'--:' �!1! •' \i _ L(� C• +2Ya �`�''� v'•. n , a� r r -1 i � �! 1/�� r,. L y� /` ”^•w.o„ne' /Tli�;”„ •r.' 1~ `•tr ! 1 �'Id��,r l :�.� ` t.�• i:Yt, " � -� �! ''� a•F rr, - r,-� '1�..� r`�T �.} `-_.... �k_r\ ^ !��W '�dl�.d�`liF,:2IT •�� ;•• I �f Ftl„� � �./Ty9°'� �"� -+✓J` T f 1 �! d�r ,f�t t:! / � '`J -'� i, apr / °tr ./nJ. I ,�•- �. ,�c _1; _ ' l I ��, Zl�'r �� l r? K ,, � 1+� y� .Jl /r._ r !i � I l L /��,`,� t, .'(� �a,, ,l , A. .t ftil f ,��( 1,�.�;"G �r •7 I I •M mil' ,, ar,'�,p -• E. y �'1'FS � { (., -,� :�; _ - r zi.n .. '{ , t� J� .~..�' ., � ! 'l.L - a -. ✓.k T11N"l�-7•'�r k'. E• z 1 ` � r ,. •• �rV�` 77 I I ��.J: i Y' ' L t� 5 C`• / S,l•. Z •mv ,�f •• J r .�ttrra� 'ylfir+h.� lit rR�., lei a/ ,' � ,� P �_� �'� jl�• rr �vjk� t `a;S ` �• ,..-:./ pena,yk.•Jr� t , -� ,r:r}R+ - -•;;'r !T-.. 1 �r C• •�+ :.' i�,S } .'�. ( ,pY.y�f �,�r J l / �,- b f-�a L t,r , v;r r r• � r 1` 1 }, ( •;>�/ `��F*;i >. j� '��a r n'r_FTt r _ - l �"'pj� % ,� �/� li +•' ti S�� a M.' 1 ••' •. -r irm l �y. -.A. f �% / '»r � ,x+ 'l .1. � 7,` '.I._' ,'. .'l'-' 1 � : r '• mss." r'V '• •% •• 1 � r� � +f: t Z L.A � � d�.. / - , 4 I �,. ••.ti. � {.. I 4 r i s Y r' 4 'vim 'c 4�i.�1' I , r ,rf r,/ 4 ,��b�F y,: -1;s t �s/ r �/•• � f t>;! � !•� r' �' /?!,r v T,.v :.� \� r r •,3'"�-,. r`� r �'';�.,� t r,�p / ,�. 4 _ �rY L �^.. I � j`r,y r ::fr ,I�: n, �4 f ;J.+,%' 1 .J: I -*� / d`'daa a'.f , :_:, r ��,+ 1 �• - 3'r�� i... o,,, r '+•r r ri:��r•�t��' �� .. r 4 �-,�_i' � ��, T, F,•-- !�-' _�/. ,rw ( f ,�_ ra.,� r iH(;�,hCatr•� w• �Q�."y., ',�`"`2 .c8:r.`+;:x°.�.1_'' ?'f�j t -�f v4 ', �?i" :\\� Y, :;� :J� lire r`•t r' t ; f �1 fir.. �t•t. ...s C y i sJ. ,. .:'-,', r, �. °. — • �a jjj��,,� V - �tArsf'...` :'� •�) ..s� �y�- ��t�- ��l �.> � ,�3 ry I ,I � ,� r r, �.;f.�di:; �'r[ ;� r.A ;1H ! l:r, ; r �dF! :��.f ..3• a y, r, � � � ;; � � q�C � �I•j�l}�p! ..`fly � ,` / F 7 t s +. / l � i y�f`-.:. e Ar�+�.�F r r >.- 1 ;(ll lt� r h+•.t.Ytt z.,..,. 4 � i .. /, � s .x yt�� / � paA.S - ''1° 'r 1 _j d ( � .t;,. F�`�ri r':•l :„ ;�;-. ,y i/ � ( t, -. .r ! re l -.1/ r -r:. .,,�'_'-. �.2�� Sr y r�� 't-'_ � �::[f a. l�r��t � J ,�.-. � of <'�_ "��•. � ,r 'u C. .r l - _ ��tfTf` _ +r -{�''''�I�,,ta r7a7,P�. rr v,r` " .. j,•� :-�J�"a... i. � l i tJ' .3�sp�''+iJ � .,� r ,.�`""I�"^ irc.,.r�k ,,{j/;�.y-t' �, f / /;. �'. i;tf3J +`, �,:ir+•' r J. E�� • i� r � � .a 'JT°�' .� I /• r �. iF. + _ , Z r,g.•ifL4 \.,�"• }' r ,�r r ,�.• Its r :..... y�l,b f �e�1`,,:� ��t'3z�,:� l� +r �Yrr 't�, c ,a l -r/ �t• / �rr r�r},�_c/j 'rril. ' y ��>rd/ l ,� a: �� -�'4i•'..� �'�' � `�"`rr�,�fi;.n :ls�?t �:,, F r}1 � 1�� •'.r ,,pyf •� �,,1+�. v- ..'q°s )I: i � ,lrtJ 1�,�� rt l , 11y, t txy� '-�,'�•,r�, ,c, .�� P �ft ,.SGi �1` ah„ -;�i 1 u + I il.Pt M^'i `�. ,• EJ1 �, Jt ,71.. f'r': :ij trt' '' q.•_�/,., _..,../ bl••r.;!"'•I ..L� ., 7j r i "a � Tr'�, y�f 1'L... t. :i3� �j s "N�Jl,�py:q. ,. ..`r-,e'j,��•K.�}.! .,�,F,�, 'i. .,� _t.,r �- � _ -�'r �,- ,* �q { ,/; f r�tffxx ! l; °-r' i �: 7, t _.�,/ .e�} hT rt. -p. >•v:.. � ��`!!;A`°f".1 I` 'M�!7;�•� "t r +l:!F' �, r.:•},�t»�}, "• ,i�9° >,,�.iy, .: . 1 �- r �;S`�L _'r�" �� ,1 �.. -1 .P •;.°t;N Jzo9 F, .y �".`':�ol �r 1`�k t, �- $a)'E.. M � l k, ift�; .y, 1�• _-..:?s. L,_,y"z t ��1 � �Fj.�.�+rY `. ; -.....�� r-.��y � � �.:r( •c �� =� Y 8�:1 ;...K�,er>~yti.,, v „�j,4.t { r.^ �" r � °"i t Y .' !° w^#:v� V I , !/ J i`' ; •'• .s�i•t �+�•�� .y,a j •7 Fi• \v 4�• l,,'.. �{:, ! � r`` � (� �{. lh ,1 l i 3-.� C ,v, 3.. +. n �}• •� r _i ` Y Q i=� .t ' �'t i l P/ i I.• I �• ,b, a {( r:. lY ,a •�. �_� �!i 'J. J r•iNe � ,1 6,_^R_ ,Y � r 1 n - I ,t �: r. _ l ya1MY' I��. Y'� y.�� t:) _" � ':� + r . �„a �.x�•,�, - '� f�� l �% yyy r, • • �lF• a }l7,Y`',?•H �' - �v `i ` �y_ a'�"K! r"., �1� �M4a"t \ „+� 'f'•` � �p``�i.l � ir. y1 ;� a �`� � f�"r,�`:, ,t� r� .T•� f�r_ l y,v�, '� Cr�;�a�.!' l�' i i1 y'' /. � / 4 +� �f+T` I y # t1`'(�T A .,� ,,� ^ 5 •Jf• � vim. � �.5�• � jy i 1 r e,. I p::. '�..3� ., r�•' s _ u r . rrti� ' 13��t1t nrl�fr [• � t�'yY-'� ✓� ,� � �*.r.a:/ `,, � Imo- ;..� y \ r l ••' a"41 � .. - � _ i'r xt.f rl li?r%l�r ��z�` ri r �'�.r, .fir � r7r rw s ..v ,l � {s / I r /,t� ..Yif"�r�3 .;e•ti:;;'?+ro:s<'�r't;:;•n�:: �'� .w'0`! .(- �,� � � � `r 1' .�P4� � ��t^;tiYt :,t;i•tii;�r}j�:1:� e` ! ,pM1 � `��,f'.. � r . ; 1. 4;• :�� _,o A r by• `. T�:;'Y'-, r:yfd3�i+ � �° n - n � � � , '`� ''�t'i•� r .��1 �,+4tivrti•{,.,. a,, „r � � S. �'fY� `� '„ �, r �j', l� �• �1l>: fy�., � ;�� r' r�tv�• ,� J/ h..t`" { rt�\-t 1 I �',1 !'7 11 f /r, i� ai t��ti:•' Vii'+�irv�'-�• a�, +• a li + ryrha�"' t.. !�� r �r I � rt ,! i r -t. �T~ t t w, jr, ` y: '•i ,t�., } r 3" ,� 1• 77 `, / �' i QL ggx r, X21 , Jn„, � �•�V. l al �G.. g fill LLB \ p O z l'�� r '; ,T•' � .i 'r'.'��'� il',r._ c ,,, air � .. �*Yv� `t J �� (di a .�' �� 1 E, ll 3 f a AAA i 7 C1 0 `•^) 00 p l, q ? t r f 8 8 O —► l J pr CD 1 \ m e7J4 co V'ot/ jj o '\ S a a° u r �n 6 � . ro : rs • K - t 4 h ,♦ ' t t y 3 wN�C S ��3 'Q✓ ■= ( / ,;; .r=;�- +��,��--E�J�� `; Iii .'�• ��,��r_!!!,�. , y I zi • \ � .•AEU G► a�� 'If i` ` �L` �� \I'JFj�\ '"�`►�riC�`ij�" ` i7�� '��<�°: � '�� tf`_ ��`A�'Rri..�lz' � � .� �� . ` PENN ZVI Womm Pi Pu_ MMM r � . ice • ti"1 � ►� .1` r �1"11 �w1ie11R�u:"� . r • MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP TYPICAL NAMES SYMBOLS graded ravels, g prowl-sand mixtures. CLEAN GW little or no fines. = GRAVELS (Little or no lines) Poorly graded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, GP GRAVELS little or no fines. (More than 50%of coarse fraction is LARGER than the GM Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures. No.4 sieve size) GRAVELS 1 q WITH FINES COARSE 7 (Appreciable amt. GRAINED of fines) GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures. SOILS (Mae than 5R of m Well graded sands, gravelly sands, little or aterial is LARGER :. SW than No.200 sieve no fines. size) CLEAN SANDS (Little pr no fines) Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little SANDS SP or no floss. (Mae than 50% of coarse fraction is SMALLER than the SM Silty Bonds, sand-sift mixtures. No.4 sieve size) SANDS u WITH FINES (Appreciable of fin amt. SC Clayey y of lines Y Y sands, sand-clay mixtures. Inorganic silts and very fine.sdhds;'rack flour, ML silty or clayey fine sands or clayey silts with slight plasticity. SILTS AND CLAYS Inorganic clays of low 10 medium plasticity, (Liquid limit LESS than 50) CL gravelly cloys, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays. FINE OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low GRAINED plasticity. SOILS (Mae than 50X. of Inorganic silts, micaceous a diatomaceous material 2 SMALLER MH fine sandy or silty soils,elastic silts. than No.200 sieve size) SILTS AND CLAYS (Liquid limit GREATER than 50) CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity,lot clays. OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silts. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS pt Pent and other highly organic soils. BOUNDARY CLASSIFICATIONS: Soils possessing characteristics of two groups are designated by combinations of group symbols. P A R T I C L E S I Z E L I M I T S SAND GRAVEL SILT OR CLAY COBBLES I BOULDERS FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE I NO.200 N0.40 NO.10 N0.4 b. 31n. 112W U. S. S T A N 0 A R 0 SIEVE SIZE . UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Reference: The Unified Soil Classification System,Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army Technical Memorandum No.3-357, ! Vol.1, March,1953. (Revised April, 1960) t0. I�IIIIRIII IC�� . III�II�I:IIIn111R11111��1 i mo __ COMPACTION TEST EXPANSION TEST SAMPLE. Y >> A. P.S.F. B. P.S.F. C. TECHNICIAN: G W P.S.F. MOISTURE CONTENT 8 DRY NJ AIR END BEGIN AIR END BEGIN AIR END DENSITY DETERMINATION ITEST DRY I TEST TEST DRY I TEST TEST DRY TEST CAN NUMBER (NO) 1 CAN WT. + WET SOIL (GM) CAN WT. + DRY SOIL (GM) CAN WEIGHT (GM) ?31Y WATER WEIGHT (GM) . DRY SOIL WEIGHT (GM) MOISTURE CONTENT (%} 330, SOIL+ RING WEIGHT (GM) 5. 5 RING WEIGHT (GM) l`15.5 NET WET SOIL WT. (GM) q 11, 3157,1 WET DENSITY (PCF) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 6. DRY DENSITY (PCF) l`I INITIAL READING DATE l0 18 INITIAL READING TIME ( M) FINAL READING DATE 0 FINAL READING TIME—( SOAKING TIME (HRS) INITIAL DIAL READING FINAL DIAL READING O DIAL READING DIFFERENCE 19 EXPANSION (%) / INDEX# 1,�% # % MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SWELL: FEET (FOOTING); FEET (FLOOR SLAB) SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: %E O b&owN f e- SAND IDA,rtP NI�;1T- [,nn L1 �42y pow FxP,a�.sro�v #PER U.B.C. STANDARD NO. 29-2 AND TABLES 29-C AND 29-D EXPANSION TEST PROJECT REPORT DATE: SHEET FIGURE (949) 768-4466 NO. Acr-11 1 OF NO. ic- Conditions Moisture Dry Density Specific Void Ratio Test Type trr�itial ��o l ©Q .q PC. Lj �4 8 Final ��s J % 1 O•'7- PC, a ' S '3 1od p, 3 0-� Peck Envelope PIT BORII`fG Peak Q• in. (nt, Q•$0 in. �---� Ufimate Envelope No. 0 PeCk 3V ° C Peek Z/00 Est A--: Residua Envelope Depth l —&/ Ult. ° C Ult. 100 pst. a 5.0 f 4.0 N Y i } 3.0 C N L N i 2.0 D .G N 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.S 2.0 3-0 4.0 5.0 normal load- ksf sample description : QVo MWIV 151.LTY -- ., AMP CO v"E"-- r"I F w vM In DIRECT SHEAR TEST PROJECT /NO. REPORTO DATE FIGURE NO. O ` ! _ Grade Beam @ 20'on Center Foundation'=Actual Depth of Each Direction beam/slab Slab 4-#4 Bars Horizontal other cone (2 @ t Sb)w/03 stirrups structure Grade Bea @ 24"o/c 1/2"-thk Elastomeric/ ;lab-on-grad Expansion membrane E 'g Water-Proofing Slab-on-grade °0 i ° 0�+° 0 fi Reinforceme _ r• �o•e +:� s way J!1�031 q S, 6 D=12"Minm. gr pproved Thick Slab 12 inm. EXPANSION/ISOLATION JOINT E BEAM ADJACENT TO LANDSCAP 4 y® Legend: a shall exhibit a minimum Relative ©Construction Joiolo @ 115 to 125%of Optimum C7 (see Detail 2) der ASTM Test Method D1557-91 d Garage nur.The In-situ Moisture content m E Expansion J;irk i for minimum 96 hours nor to our A see Data 1 prior p t7 m ®B Driveway Grade shall exhibit minimum 4000 psi 28-day 5101 ._ _ f (see Detail B) th for Sulphate in soils>0.2% ='• contain a minimum Cement(low alkall, 6.0 sacks/cu yd of cement with a 20. :ment ratio of 0.5 mall be Grade 60 and conform to UBC rM A615,616,617&706) FT Llf B bl c V4,14,y tures shall be approved by the Design ise. ifmcations,refer to Report Text DRIVEWAY SLAB ork,Concrete,steel and drainage work in a workmanship manner to the o esign Engineer and City. C C feet of structural elements&top of Slope --�_., E (sides&bottom). E „g odology,means,timing,tolerances of the v K comply with latest ASTM,ACI,CRSI, Detail 3 applicable&other a Standards,�- C pp� whichever a �... E ply with UBC 1997 or its atest adopted version latwor ON-GRADE CONCRETE FLATWORK I,qy Specifications 9 osed MARTIN RESIDENCE Lotus Consultin GLASGOW AVENUE 23112 Alcalde I RIFF, CA Laguna Hills, C Date: Figure Phone: (949) -7t 10-21-04 10 Fax: (949) 768-C MA E Sr a s a' $ February 15, 2005 MS 04-109 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 So. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: ENGINEER'S PAD CERTIFICATION FOR(9192-G) To Whom It May Concern: Pursuant to section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code,this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for the above referenced site As the Civil Engineer for the subject project, I hereby state the rough grading for this lot has been completed in conformance with the approved plan, or as shown on the attached redline bluelines and requirements of the City of Encinitas, Codes and Standards. Certification was preformed on February 15, 2005. 23.24.310(B). The following list provides the pad elevations as field verified and shown on the approved grading plan: Pad Elevation Pad Elevation Location. Per plan per field measurement Residence 198.5 198.4 If you have any questions in regards to the above, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, OFES /® The Mapsmith, Inc. ��L H Michael H. Smi , PE Na President P 9/36/o5, �9VIQa CALd 535,1''. His}. 101, Svire G Solana Beach, L'9 92015 &58-2-59-2510v mike athemansmith com ♦ CIVIL ENGINEERING ♦ GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ♦ LAND PLANNING& GEODESIGN ♦ ENGINEERING GEOLOGY ♦ SOIL&H2O CONTAMINATION jw�� ♦ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEYING ♦ MATERIAL TESTING&INSPECTION ♦ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ♦ JEARTHQUAKE &DISTRESS STUDIES ♦ PHONE (949)768-4466 ♦ FAX (949) 768-0735 ♦ E-MAIL LotusEngrs @aol.com 14 February 2005 City of Encinitas Document No. 204111-RG Engineering Department 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 Attention: Mr. Todd Baunbach, Engineering Inspector Subject: Geotechnical Engineer's Statement of Verification of Compliance for Rough Grading Reference Project: Grading Permit No. 9192 GI Address: 1702 Glasgow Avenue Encinitas California 92024 Owner: Rosanna and Kyle Martin Grading Contractor: Warner Grading From: 2/03/2005 To: 2/08/2005 In accordance with the City of Encinitas Grading and Excavation Code and the requirements of the Building Code, the undersigned verifies that he has personal knowledge of the testing and inspection provided by our firm's staff members during the placement and compaction of earth fills described in the approved report for this project. It is my opinion that the work is completed on this project as outlined above to rough grade in compliance with said codes. The emplaced fills have been compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90% per ASTM D1557-00. This verification does not include exact horizontal or vertical controls nor dimensions of the earthwork within the purview of others. The construction, installation, and placement of fine grade and geostructural items shall be constructed (see attached Exhibit A for Fine Grade Requirements) per the recommendations contained in our Geotechnical Report dated 10/20/2004 (Document No.204111 ). The completed earthwork shall be kept moist at all times and shall not be allowed to dry or desiccate. LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. t e < e ,% c ,, Sampath V. Raghavan, R.G.E. 705 (Exp. 3-31-07) Date: Principal Geotechnical Engineer Attachments: Summary of Field Density Tests, Table I-1 and I-2 '�' i Rough Grade Geotechnical Plan, Figure 1 ; � Lotus4ordproWerification(engineers)120411 RG verification] :—L ; ♦ LOTUS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ♦ 23112 ALCALDE DRIVE, SUITE D ♦ LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 EXHIBIT A FINE GRADE REQUIREMENTS This is to remind you that the following checked items will need inspection for geotechnical compliance per Code requirements. It is very essential that these items be completed for geotechnical adequacy, for short/long-term stability and for the site to remain suitable for its intended uses. Non-checked items have either been completed or are not presently required. Footing Inspection (for all buildings) Slab Subgrade (saturation/compaction/sand placement, etc.) Retaining Walls (drainage and backfill) Utility Trenches (electrical/TV/gas/water/sewer/drain, etc.) Curb and Gutter Subgrade (?) Hardscape, Driveway, Subgrade Laboratory Testing and Analyses Final Walk-through Inspection Final Geotechnical Report (for compliance/maintenance/upkeep of project) Please call this office to schedule inspections as:needed. * * * SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY & MOISTURE CONTENT TESTS TEST DATE APPROXIMATE DEPTH REF OMC ;8; IDD RMC RC Remarks S D N NO. 2005 LOCATION B.E.G. CURVE (See Plan) (feet) (%) (Pcfl (%) (%) C R G 1 2/03 #1 -4.5 C 9.0 122 89 94 ottom of overex 2 #2 -4.5 C X 9.0 130 9.0 120 100 92 Bottom of overex X 3 #3 -4.5 C 9.0 130 8.0 127 89 98 ttom of overex 4 #4 -4.5 C 9.0 130 9.0 125 100 96 ttom of overex X 5 #5 -4.5 C 9.0 130 9.0 119 100 92 ottom of overex X 6 #6 -4.5 C 9.0 130 10.0 118 111 91 ottom of overex X 7 #1 -2.0 C 9.0 130 7.0 118 78 91 Backfill X 8 #2 -2.0 C 9.0 130 7.0 120 78 92 Backfill X X 9 #3 -2.0 C 9.0 130 7.0 122 78 94 Backfill 10 #4 -2.0 C 9.0 130 7.0 124 78 95 Backfill X 11 #5 -2.0 X C 9.0 130 7.0 123 78 95 Backfill 12 #6 -2.0 C 9.0 130 7.0 125 78 96 Backfill X 13 #7 -3.0 C 9.0 130 7.0 117 78 90 ottom of overex X 14 #8 -3.0 C 9.0 130 7.0 117 78 90 Bottom of overex X 15 #9 -3.0 C 9.0 130 8.0 121 89 93 ttom of overex X 16 #10 -3.0 C 9.0 130 9.0 121 100 93 ttom of overex X 17 #11 -3.0 C 9.0 130 8.0 118 89 91 Bottom of overex X 18 #12 -3.0 C X 9.0 130 7.0 118 78 91 ttom of overex X 19 #7 -2.0 C 9.0 130 8.0 121 89 93 Backfill 20 #8 -2.0 C 9.0 130 8.0 118 89 91 Backfi I XX 21 #9 -2.0 C 9.0 130 7.0 122 78 94 Backfill X 22 #10 -2.0 C 9.0 130 7.0 120 78 92 Backri I I - X 23 #11 -2.0 C 9.0 130 7.0 118 78 91 Backfill X 24 #12 -2.0 C 9.0 130 8.0 120 89 92 Backfill X 25 02/04 #7 -4.0 X C 9.0 130 9.0 115 100 88 ottom of overex 26 #8 -4.0 C 9.0 130 10.0 112 111 86 Bottom of overex X 27 #9 -4.0 C 9.0 130 10.0 113 111 87 Bottom of overex X 28 #10 -4.0 C 9.0 130 10.0 116 111 89 X ttom of overex 29 #13 -4.0 C 9.0 130 8.0 117 89 90 ttom of overex X 30 #14 -4.0 C 9.0 130 8.0 116 89 89 ottom of overex X 31 02/07 #13 -4.0 C 9.0 1 X 30 7.0 126 78 97 ttom of overex 32 #14 -4.0 C 9.0 130 8.0 126 89 97 ottom of overex X 33 2/08 #1 --4.0 C 9.0 130 8.0 119 89 92 Finished Grade X 34 #2 -4.0 C 9.0 130 8.0 121 89 93 Finished Grade X 35 #3 -4.0 C 9.0 130 7.0 119 78 92 inished Grade X 36 #4 -4.0 C 9.0 130 7.0 119 78 92 Finished Grade X Where: OMC= Optimum Moisture Content & MDD= Maximum Dry Density based on ASTM Method D1557-91 X IMC= Insitu Moisture Content& IDD= Insitu Dry Density : RMC= Relative Moisture Content RC= Relative Compaction : SC= Sand Cone , DT= Drive Tube, NG= Nuclear Gage, DR= Driven Ring B.E.G. = Below Existing Grade Lotus Consulting SITE: Proposed Martin Residence Engineers, Inc. APPLIED 1702 Glasgow Avenue EARTH Cardiff, Ca 23112 Alcalde Dr.,Suite D, PROJECT NO.: DATE Laguna Hills,Ca.92653 TABLE Phone:(949)-768-4466 SCIENCES Fax: (949)-768-0735 204111 11 February 2005 I-1 * * * SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY & MOISTURE CONTENT TESTS TEST DATE APPROXIMATE DEPTH REF OMC MDD IMC IDD RMC RC Remarks S D N NO. 2005 LOCATION B.E.G. CURVE C R G (See Plan) (feet) N (PCO M (Pal) N N 37 2/08 #5 -6" C 9.0 130 8.0 121 89 93 Finished Grade X 38 #6 -6" C 9.0 130 6.0 122 67 94 Finished Grade X 39 #7 -6" C 9.0 130 8.0 119 89 92 Finished Grade X 40 #8 -6" C 9.0 130 9.0 122 100 94 Finished Grade X 41 #9 -6" C 9.0 130 8.0 120 89 92 Finished Grade X 42 #10 -6" C 9.0 130 10.0 121 111 93 Finished Grade X 43 #11 -6" C 9.0 130 7.0 119 78 92 Finished Grade X Where: OMC= Optimum Moisture Content &MDD= Maximum Dry Density based on ASTM Method D1557-91 IMC= Insitu Moisture Content& IDD= Insitu Dry Density : RMC= Relative Moisture Content RC = Relative Compaction : SC= Sand Cone , DT= Drive Tube, NG= Nuclear Gage, DR= Driven Ring B.E.G. = Below Existing Grade Lotus Consulting SITE: Proposed Martin Residence Engineers, Inc. APPLIED 1702 Glasgow Avenue EARTH Cardiff, Ca 23112 Alealde Dr.,Suite D, PROJECT NO. • DATE TABLE Laguna Hills,Ca.92653 SCIENCES Phone:(949)-768-4466 204111 11 February 2005 1_2 Fax: (949)-768-0735 c� tu a _ — _ — Cn 39 XCj 4 Gp Cn W-K U C, s� W <X k w d two , t � I UA I IQ GV _ ......... �' _.... ....-. V M ' Qt < CSI o v ;C; t .r 40' • �� o f t t Q b, _ A-_�r: -1._ I kD to i i LJ V) CU us i'r 0i (Y) � to 0 °' / m ate D . 1 x 0 O E� ..L.. . .. _ , maw ci < !F a p f �rl 4;,9 M ' .. ..,....n..r .� [Y9 ..a`t• 11 3 w„a, M'MOW wz OWT IRA q?� di w M; B W(;'•j � � ,..- L� ^Y•- nom,✓rr 6'0 9 k;'. 0 December 12, 2005 City of Encinitas 501 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92007 ATTN: TODD BAUMBACH RE: 1702 GLASGOW—CDP 04-153 —AS-GRADED CERTIFICATION Dear Todd, The grading under permit number 9192-G has been performed in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan or as shown on the attached As-Graded plan. If you have any comments or concerns,please feel free to contact me at the number noted below. Very ttruly,yours, Michael H. Smith,✓RCE 65090 QF CA01,. 535 A°orth H«i: 101, Stlite C Solana Beach, C:9 92075 858-259-2510v themaDsmlthaa cox.net