The URL can be used to link to this page

2006-60 G City ONGINEERING SER VICES DEPARTMENT Encinitas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering January 10, 2008 Attn: Wells Fargo Bank Rancho Santa Fe PCS 6008 Pasco Delicias lsr Floor Mac E 2456-011 Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067 RE: Robin Sides 3275 Poppy Hills Lane APN 264-091-90 Grading Permit 60-GI Final release of security Pen-nit 60-GI authorized earthwork, private drainage improvements, and erosion control, all as necessary to build described project. The Field Inspector has approved the grading and finaled the project. Therefore, release of the remaining security deposit is merited. The following Certificate of Deposit Account has been cancelled by the Financial Services Manager and is hereby released for payment to the depositor. Account# 8249891816 in the amount of$21,460.04. The document originals are enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633-2779 or in writing, attention the Engineering Department. Sinc ely, f F'f � Debra Gei art ay Lembach Engineering Technician Finance Manager Subdivision Engineering Financial Services CC: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Robin Sides Debra Geishart File Enc. TEL 760-633-2600 / FAX 760-633-2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024-3633 TDD 760-633-2700 �� recycled paper City 0 0NGINEERING SER VICES DEPARTMENT Eminitas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering October 31, 2006 Attn: Wells Fargo Bank Rancho Santa Fe PCS 6008 Pasco Delicias 1"Floor Mac E 2456-011 Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067 RE: Robin Sides 3275 Poppy Hills Lane APN 264-091-90 Grading Permit 60-GI Partial release of security Permit 60-GI authorized earthwork,private drainage improvements, and erosion control, all as necessary to build described project. The Field Inspector has approved rough grade. Therefore, release of a portion of the security deposit is merited. The following Certificate of Deposit Account has been cancelled by the Financial Services Manager and is hereby released for payment to the depositor. Account#8249891808 in the amount of$64,380.11. The document originals are enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns,please contact Debra Geishart at(760) 633-2779 or in writing, attention the Engineering Department. r Sinc ly, J Debra Geish y L bach Engineering Technician finance Manager Subdivision Engineering Financial Services CC: Jay Lembach, Finance Manager Robin Sides Debra Geishart File Enc. TEL 760-633-2600 / FAX 760-633-2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024-3633 TDD 760-633-2700 Je recycled paper CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION• PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: 9_4, � ' hl t?�1 �'aCC acct t se L kL, e? t.-ua l� a-ct. lr /i �<�Ci��S fu-r,�%iCt U '� GrS P 9-25 oL IhilZe LGoy„o b.Q.tO�,►!G �ssb.a v OV�ie-x lZeLCr�cjooAc�- oF yicorrc� ,�rp2�i�1T` d I© -Z-c)(, ©� �v�r�.�tcf� ©,v �� v Acv /.►�i�n�v�; ,8�1�: . cL .J4� tek -TA �/� •��4v r�e'&� iLlll[.�/ /��.. �p��s'rt� /t/�c,N . G�.► 733 �'"�,/E lu��a� �y�q�C� ✓h f L_t,�fr� {,./',� �D 3-�C� ��i� �.,�T �+-uc� �z� F,,/�►zc,.r1 l.�.vor�.tl, ,D�'Z-�v�-rt.� t�:5rZ--"AJ( r?s:N • /j'II�t� b�frv, cf� �,. h l� gceosS, _ ?�/I�l.► f-y�2 r aive 7 Sc tip �fC P%off Gv A, a4 �s ��- i3-�C, ,lh�,u�rz►v� ,grvs� ��Sntrt:s ,��„�,Ga„� /c' m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION• PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: /9i'r'! 'inlvE ,C�4u�►C,L ,B •JC, � JU/K 0A09O1P.; , A Pz U?e- , AX3021-fFt'I Llu:A!& - S�tLL(.t,�/• t�nl'C, S t h cc{rr/�/ -7� 6�tf . cXl ek i rm�r c � 5 wz cC, eI�s�cL qc Z/►t S /4 saa�c �u I-ell ez4- iZ le" CPE- EV ScE 2-{ iv jt_1_ �t uvc� ofCt✓ i �iL�a rrJ L'c�z� n`�t1S,T` r r-L ,rcC�, ^ �� 2G—z L`�•9s�� C c,,?,�oL z 7 X 2 t'7 � IS i " A7 n AIL:, � CF>/., Q,lea �S � L�c,c� ��/ /'+'t o�%/,t/t., �rr:f'r71./ Ls-l�nta.�c�lp,•"� ©itL:'e c�-f. fs r-'c el,4.1,eI�c 6:<-c IIII Z7 a S Ale4 V Off+ a/G T •'/f/c'rJV�Y� 17EV 7Z:- QL M14429 v ENGINEERING SERVICES I DEPARTMENT 505 S . VULCAN 'AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING-PERMIT PERMIT�NC_____-nOGI PARCEL NO. : 264-091-9000 PLAN NO, : 60-GI JOB SITE ADDRESS: 3275 POPPY HILLS LANE CASE NO. : APPLICANT NAME SIDES , ROBIN MAILING ADDRESS : 3275 POPPY HILLS LANE PHONE NO. : 619-520-269 CITY: ENCINITAS STA'L'E: CA ZIP : 92024 CONTRACTOR : ROSEWOOD DEVELOPMENT PHONE NO. ; 760-519-213; LICENSE NO. : 733832 LICENSE TYP .: B ENGINEER MAPSMITH, INC. PHONE NO PERMIT ISSUE : g PERMIT EXP. DATE: 8/31/0 PERMIT ISSUED BY ; / % INSPECTO TODD BAUMBACH - -- ____________ _ -- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS 1 . FERMI`" FEF Ch-- , r ' `. P L.4, EC'F REPO> 'I T: 3 . INSPECTION FEE 4 . 292 . 00 4 , INSECT ?t DF'P+DuIT' : 5 . PLAN CHECK FEE 00 F SE :URITY DF'FOSa? 7 . FLOOD CONTROL FEE 1 , 365 . 00 8 . TRAFFIC FEE � ---------- ---------------- DESCRIPTION OF Fdt' RK PERMIT TO GUARANTEE BOTH PERFORMANCE AND LABOR AND MATERIAL - >w WORK , DRAINAGE , PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS AND EROSION ��tTRO1 PER x �� .�H� ='O' � p GRADING PERMIT' 60-G. CONTRACTOR MUST M.�I NTA TT�I TRAP F I C COTt I R�D AT ALT, TIMES PER APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAr3 OR PER W A, T . C .H. STANDARDS"' LETTER DATED AUGUST 7 . 2006 APPLIES . INSPECTION ---------------- DATE -------- INSPECTOR` S SIGNATURE --- INITIAL INSPECTION COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED !p — "' --- ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION /p 0-0 -- FINAL INSPECTION - _. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY;WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. A314 LGNATURE DAT ED PR I NT NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER CIRCLE ONE: 1 . OWNS 2 . AGENT 3: OTHER- Ar , /iii: CIVIL,GEOTECHNICAL,&QUALITY ENGINEERING FOUNDATION DESIGN*LAND SURVEYING*SOIL TESTING CLIENT: SIDES PROJECT: SID 806 -- D SIDES FAMILY TRUST ATE: 26 OCT. 2006 3275 Poppy Hills Lane Encinitas, CA. 92024 Subject: Results of Compaction Testing and Inspection during Re-grading for the Lot located at 3275 Poppy Hills Lane, Encinitas, CA. (APN: 264-091-90) Reference (a): Update Letter and Foundation Recommendations Report by North County Compaction Engineering, Inc., dated November 21, 2005. Dear Mr. Sides: Pursuant to your request, we have completed our inspection and compaction testing of the re-grading operations for the subject parcel. The results of our field density tests and our laboratory soil tests are shown on Enclosure (1). Site preparation, compaction, and testing were accomplished between 22 August and 5 October, 2006. Based on our observations and testing, it is our opinion that the work performed during that period was in general conformance with the requirements of Reference (a) and the City of Encinitas Grading Ordinance. On 22 August, clearing began on the subject lot with the contractor removing some surface vegetation. On this date, the contractor processed and recompacted the surface soils for the house pad by ripping and cross-ripping the surface materials to an approximate depth of 1 to 2 feet below the existing surface. The processed surface soils were watered as necessary and recompacted. The limits of over-excavation extended across the entire flat portion of the house pad. This grading operation was accomplished to help mitigate the effects of differential settlement of the proposed structure. The contractor placed and compacted the native soils on the house pad until the designed pad grades were achieved. Density was achieved by the use of a 950 rubber tire loader and a D-4 bulldozer compacting the soil as fill was placed in thin lifts. Since the existing soils were low in moisture content, the contractor spent additional time and effort 1 161 1-A SO.MELROSE DRIVE#285,VISTA,CA 92081-5471 Ph:(760)945-3150 Fax:(760)945-4221 - Sid 806 in his mixing operation in order to ensure near-optimum moisture and proper compaction in the fill material. As indicated by our Compaction Test Results, Enclosure (1), density tests performed in the re-construction of the house pad indicated over 90% relative compaction as compared to the Maximum Dry Density per ASTM Test Procedure D 1557-91. The surface soils at finish grade are considered to exhibit a low to medium expansion potential (EI = 32 to 53) per Reference (a). p It is recommended that the continuous perimeter foundations and concrete slabs for a light weight, wood framed, stucco type structure founded on the native soils shall be constructed and reinforced in accordance with Reference (a) and as modified by the following minimum design criteria: a. The continuous perimeter foundations shall extend a minimum depth of 24 inches and a minimum width of 15 inches into the compacted fill soils for both a single and two story structure. Foundation depths shall be measured from the lowest adjacent grade. The continuous foundations shall be reinforced with at least four No. 4 steel bars, two bars shall be placed 3 inches from the top of the foundation and the other bars shall be placed 3 inches from the bottom. b. Footings which span from native cut material to compacted fill soils, where applicable for a transition lot, shall be reinforced with a minimum of one additional No. 5 steel bar top and bottom to control potential differential -. movement extending 10 feet on either side of the daylight line. No. 3 rebar ties at 12 inches on center shall be used for the construction of this grade beam to help control potential differential movement. c. Footings placed on or adjacent to the top of cut or fill slopes shall have a minimum horizontal distance of 7 feet from the bottom edge of the footings to the face of the slope, for slopes less than 20 feet in height. For slopes greater than 20 feet, a horizontal distance of H/3 shall be used where H= height of slope, but need not exceed 40 feet maximum. (See attachment A) - d. All concrete slabs shall be a minimum of full 5-inches in thickness, and reinforced with a minimum of No. 3 steel rebars at 18-inches on center both ways and placed in the center of the slab. The steel bars shall be wire tied to the perimeter foundation steel and bent downward into the foundations at 18-inches on center to a depth of 3-inches from the bottom. In order to minimize vapor 2 161 1=A SO.MELROSE DRIVE#285,VISTA,CA 92081-5471 Ph:(760)945-3150 Fax:(760)945-4221 Sid 806 transmission, an impermeable membrane (ie: 10 mil visqueen) shall be placed over 3-inches of clean, poorly graded, coarse sand, gravel or crushed rock. The visqueen shall be covered with 2-inches of sand to protect it during construction and the sand should be lightly moistened just prior to placing concrete. All concrete used on this project shall have a minimum compressive strength of 3000 psi unless otherwise increased on the Building Plan. - e. Interior concrete slabs shall be provided with saw-cut joints spaced at a maximum of 10 feet on center each way within 24 hours after the pour and the saw-cuts shall be 1/4 of the slab thickness. It is imperative that the drainage system around the proposed structure shall be designed and implemented to provide positive drainage away from all buildings in order to preclude moisture intrusion into the subgrade soils beneath the building foundations and slabs. f. Exterior slabs for hardscape, pool decks, walkways, patios, etc. shall be a minimum of 4 inches in thickness and reinforced with a minimum of No. 3 steel rebars at 18 inches on center each way. The reinforcing steel shall be placed in the upper 1/3 of the slab and held in place with concrete chairs. All hardscape slabs and sidewalks shall be founded on a minimum of 3 inches of clean, poorly graded, coarse sand, gravel or crushed rock. These foundation and slab recommendations are minimum design requirements for the soils encountered during grading; however, the actual foundations shall be designed by the Structural Engineer for the expected live and - dead loads, and for wind and seismic loads. Findings of this Report are valid as of this date; however, changes in conditions of a property can occur with passage of time, whether they be due to natural process or works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, - changes in applicable or appropriate standards occur whether they result from legislation or broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, findings of this Report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this Report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of one year. In the event that any changes in the nature, design, or location of buildings are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the conclusions of this Report are modified or verified in writing. 3 1611-A SO.MELROSE DRIVE#285,VISTA,CA 92081-5471 Ph:(760)945-3150 Fax:(760)9454221 flat-os B//I/%//G•G•/'%//I/, /iic. Sid 806 The Engineer has prepared this Report for the exclusive use of the client and authorized agents. This Report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranties, either expressed or implied, are made as to the professional advice provided under the terms of this agreement, and included in the Report. B & B Engineering Inc. and Associates appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, 1 Stephen B. Peter RCE 38623 Expires 3-31-07 4 1611-A SO.MELROSE DRIVE#285,VISTA,CA 92081-5471 Ph:(760)945-3150 Fax:(760)945-4221 iiCeriiii/, /iie Client SIDES Project: SID 906 Date: Oct-06 Test Dry Density,pcf Moisture,% Relative Retest Test Soil No. Test Date Test Location E1/Depth Type Field Maximum Field Opt. Compaction No. 1 9/28/06 PAD OVEREXCAVATION -1.5 A 122.3 129.0 10.0 10.5 95 2 9/28/06 PAD OVEREXCAVATION -1.5 A 120.8 129.0 10.7 10.5 94 3 9/28/06 PAD OVEREXCAVATION -1.5 A 115.7 129.0 10.0 10.5 90 4 9/28/06 PAD OVEREXCAVATION -1 A 117.2 129.0 10.0 10.5 91 -- 5 9/28/06 PAD OVEREXCAVATION -1 A 116.1 129.0 10.5 10.5 90 6 10/5/06 PAD OVEREXCAVATION -1 A 118.7 129.0 9.5 10.5 92 7 10/5/06 PAD OVEREXCAVATION 0 A 117.2 129.0 9.6 10.5 91 8 10/5/06 PAD OVEREXCAVATION 0 A 117.9 129.0 10.9 10.5 91 COMPACTION CURVE DATA SOIL TYPE AND DESCRIPTION OPTIMUM MAXIMUM DRY A. TAN BROWN CLAYEY SAND MOISTURE% DENSITY C 10.5 129.0 COMPACTION TEST DATA Enclosure 1 FIGURE 1BA-I-1 2001 CALIFORNIA WILDING CODE FACE OF FOOTING TOP OF SLOPE IF FACE OF ` • • 0 STRUCTURE TOE OF H/3 BUT NEED NOT H SLOPE EXCEED 40 FT. 1 (12 192 mm) MAX, H12 BUT NEED NOT EXCEED 15 FT. (4572 mm)MAX, FIGURE IBA-1.1-SETBACK DIMENSIONS ATTACHMENT A MAP"' August 28, 2007 City of Encinitas 501 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas; CA 92007 ATTN: TODD BAUMBACH RE: GRADING PERMIT NUMBER 60-G Dear Todd, The grading under permit number 60-G has been performed in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan or as shown on the attached As-Graded plan. If you have any comments or concerns,please feel free to contact me at the number noted below. Very y y Michael H. SmVRE 0 Flo. �M1 5115 A venida Encinas, suite I Carlsbad Cg 92008 760-931-8700V mikeOthemapsmith corn m f January 18, 2006 FEB L�6R.v 'i City of Encinitas ._ _ _^j 501 South Vulcan Ave, t s Encinitas, CA 92007 - - ----_ _ ATTN: STEPHANIE KELLAR/ENGINEERING DEPT. RE: 3275 POPPY HILLS LANE—HYDROLOGY& TREATMENT Dear Stephanie, The purpose of this letter is to formally address the hydrology and hydraulics of the above mentioned site as it relates to the proposed redevelopment. The overall site drainage is overland, and flows to various discharge points around the pad. In the existing condition all surface water is allowed to flow in and over vegetated areas across the subject property. To the best of my knowledge,no offsite drainage impacts the subject property. This will be considered a priority project due to the 6400 sf of concrete driveway surface being proposed. Runoff treatment calculations will be submitted to validate the size of the proposed treatment basin shown on the grading plan. If you have any comments or concerns, or if you require any calculations,please feel free to contact me at the number noted below. Very trul ours, ichael H. Smith, RCE 65090 L H X xn y 7 1 _535Norriz Hk��. 101, Suite L Solana Beach, C4 92075 thomansmithncax.ner 858-259-2510v March 2, 2006 D E C E V E City of Encinitas VAR 3 1 X106 501 South Vulcan Ave. Encinitas, CA 92007 ENGINEERING SERViCES CITY OF ENCiNlTAS ATTN: STEPHANIE KELLAR/ENGINEERING DEPT. RE: 3275 POPPY HILLS LANE—HYDROLOGY & TREATMENT Dear Stephanie, The purpose of this letter is to formally address the hydrology and hydraulics of the above mentioned site as it relates to the proposed redevelopment. The overall site drainage is overland, and flows to various discharge points around the pad. In the existing condition all surface water is allowed to flow in and over vegetated areas across the subject property. To the best of my knowledge, no offsite drainage impacts the subject property. This will be considered a priority project due to the 7530 sf of concrete driveway surface being proposed. Runoff treatment calculations are as follows: • 7530 sf(imp. surface) X 0.05 ft. (rainfall) =376 cf(required volume) • The basin as shown on Grading Plan Dw J. detention for treatment of the driveway imperviou0s area.provides for 380 c.f. of If you have any comments or concerns, or if you require any additional calculations, please feel free to contact me at the number noted below. Very truly yours, Michael H. Smith, RCE 65090 < , A. Cj y X" /o Ar f) r F the�dDSmith�n c ox.net MAP March 2, 2006 i D City of Encinitas i� �j SUN g 2006 501 South Vulcan Ave. I Encinitas, CA 92007 ---- ---- EtV,=: `d�;l,, ''�'C SERVICES ATTN: STEPHANIE KELLAR/ENGINEERING DEPT. RE: 3275 POPPY HILLS LANE—HYDROLOGY & TREATMENT Dear Stephanie, The purpose of this letter is to formally address the hydrology and hydraulics of the above mentioned site as it relates to the proposed redevelopment. The overall site drainage is overland, and flows to various discharge points around the pad. In the existing condition all surface water is allowed to flow in and over vegetated areas across the subject property. To the best of my knowledge, no offsite drainage impacts the subject property. This will be considered a priority project due to the 7530 sf of concrete driveway surface being proposed. Runoff treatment calculations are as follows: • 7530 sf(imp, surface) X 0.05 ft. (rainfall) = 376 cf(required volume) • The basin as shown on Grading Plan Dwg. No. 60-G provides for 380 c.f. of detention for treatment of the driveway impervious area. For purposes of comparison, the proposed change in runoff coefficient from the condition to the developed condition is approximately 0.45 (exist) to 0.95 (developed for the driveway portion of the pad). This would be a change of 0.50 in runoff coefficient. For the driveway area of 7,530sf, this would equate to 140 cf in the existing condition, and 280 cf in the developed condition. Since 380 cf of treatment area is proposed then treatment basin should be of adequate size. If you have any comments or concerns, or if you require any additional calculations, please feel free to contact me at the number noted below. Very truly yours, ichael H. Smith CE 65090 � cpvit themaDSmith�cox:net `°° �`� vailr� y 6ry3 � i r n•,pls ,° 'V i �V� �iV l�`I VI �' t., '�'��a �rx,,k�. •"t' �,_ � ate+ � a+ a • , "RT : 'H#r LQ,`k. i ur# - a � R a s. s. a " }ry. r * ak o-k � " P - r i �u i F ng. ,x � x 3 r $r v t at h F f� 4 s+� Y� l r• x,� " yti�jt"� q ' u 5r; {fib 1 � � , T ?„fir r '' ` a ”z z '� � {„� ��:�� & ��•'_ � 'c" yc# 6:+c k Rf w" Vii- F, �z ��ice:. } IIf II a, r ��. "`*e �.«^,�F" T2�r A k yam. -Fy � t, �g �r• �g � �`... f i a Ef� ` } "�fti - n ` t� Safi a �"•� � ..,x � ;3�$ ,� �� I j� ��^'t x 3, `A� r s r 5 u "'O" ` $ ' wls0'` w '$u r n MAP October 24, 2006 MS 05-174 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: ENGINEER'S PAD CERTIFICATION 3275 POPPY HILLS LANE (DWG. NO. 60-G) To Whom It May Concern: Pursuant to Section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for the above referenced site as the Engineer of Record for the subject property. I hereby state that the rough grading for this project has been completed in conformance with the approved plan and requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards. Certification was pertonned on October 19, 2006. The following is a list of pad elevations as field verified and depicted on the approved grading plan pursuant to Section 23.24.3 10 (B): Pad Elevation Pad Elevation Location Per Plan PAD Per Field Measurement 306.0 306.1* Construction of line and grade for all engineered drainage devices and/or retaining walls have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. The location and inclination of all manufactured slopes have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. ]'he construction of earthen berms and positive building pad drainage have been field verified and are in substantial conformance with the subject grading plan. If you should have any questions in reference to the information listed above, please do not hesitate to contact this office. w� Very trul y Yours, V L The Mapsmith, Inc. �y . �. No. F 0 Michael Smith, PE .x President C`erli a„ .�ASa of ' mike�ilthf.ma smtzh._c L n MAP October 23, 2006 MS 05-174 City of Encinitas Engineering Services Permits 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: ENGINEER'S PAD CERTIFICATION 3275 POPPY HILLS LANE (DWG. NO. 60-G) To Whom It May Concern: Pursuant to Section 23.24.3 10 of the Encinitas Municipal Code, this letter is hereby submitted as a Pad Certification Letter for the above referenced site as the Surveyor for the subject property. I hereby state that the rough grading for this project has been completed in confonnance with the approved plan and requirements of the City of Encinitas Codes and Standards. Certification was perfonned on October 19, 2006. The following is a list of pad elevations as field verified and depicted on the approved grading p Q , [ g g plan pursuant to Section 23.24.310 (B): pP ed �t( '► 4eW Pad Elevation Pad Location per plan i PAD 306.0 ie d easurement 06.3 If you should have any questions in reference to the information listed above, please do l not hesitate to contact this office. r I * NOTE: This pad elevation difference from g lan 7 elevation of the proposed dwelling of 306.83.p grade will not raise the finish floor Very truly yours, s/ The Mapsmith, Inc. Michael Smith,PE President lnike��thenaapsmtlh_c'cIm 14ORTH COUNTY COMPACnON ENGINEERING, INC. ^A 4AAQ YrrA° ....__FIb E 564 Al Mayo AUG 3 1 2306 1007 Emerald Bay Laguna Beach, CA 92651 ENGINE1P NG SERMEs CITY OF ENCINiTAS Subject: Report of Certification of Compacted Fill Ground Proposed Single Family Dwelling's Parcels 1,2 and 3 of Mayo Subdivision, Tract No. 99-207 and Parcels F-1 and G-� of Wildflower South Encinitas, California Reference: 1.) "Report of Geotechnical Investigation", Rancho de]!Mayo Subdivision, Tract 88-351 RPL prepared by Southern California and Testing, Inc. dated May 24, 1989 2.) "Preliminary Soils Investigation,Parcels F-1 and G-1 Wildflower South" prepared by North County Compaction Engineering, Inc. dated December 11, 1998 Dear Mr. Mayo: In response to your request,the following report has been prepared to indicate results of soil testing,observations,and inspection of earthwork construction at the subject site. Testing and inspection services were performed from July 16, 2001 through January 21, 2003. Briefly,our findings reveal filled ground has been compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90%). Therefore, we recommend construction continue as scheduled. 502P& Our firm was retained to observe grading operations with regard to current standard practices and to determine the degree of compaction of placed fill. Grading plans for parcels F-I and G-1 were prepared by K& S Engineering of San Diego. Grading plans for Mayo subdivision, Tract No. 99-207 were prepared by San Dieguito Engineering of Rancho Santa Fe, California. P. O. BOX 302002 - E5CON0100, CA 92030 - (760)480-1116 FAX(760) 741-6566 NORTH COMM COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5693 Page 2 Grading operations were performed by Greg Whillock(CWG)of Vista,California. Approximate locations and depth of filled ground and extent of earthwork construction covered in this report are indicated on the attached Plate No. One entitled, "Test Location Sketch". Subdivision grading operations were performed to create level building pads to accommodate the proposed dwellings and to construct interior roadways. Should the finished pads be altered in any way, we should be contacted to provide additional recommendations. The site was graded in accordance with the recommendations set forth in referenced reports No.'s 1 and 2. The site was graded to approximately conform to project plans. Actual pad size and elevation may differ. Finish grade operations are to be completed at a later date. LABORATORY TESTING Representative soils samples were collected and returned to the laboratory for testing. The following tests were performed and are tabulated on the attached Plate No. Three, 1. Optimum Moisture/Maximum Density(ASTM D-1557) 2. Expansion Potential Test(FHA. Standard) 3. Direct Shear Test (ASTM D-3084) SOIL CONDITIONS Native soils encountered were silty-sands, clayey-sands, gravelly-clays and silty-clays. Fill soils were generated from on-site excavation. The building sites contained a transition from cut to fill. However,cut areas located within the building area were over excavated a minimum of 3 feet and brought to grade with compacted soil. Over excavation was carried throughout the realm of the building pad(s)surface. HORTH"COClIYTY i " �" COMOAC'TIOIY E14GINEERING Gy INC. Project No. CE-5693 Page 3 Expansive soils exist at finish grade on all parcels. The expansion index for each lot is as follows: Parcel Ind= CIa� i anon F-1 &G-1 82 High No. 1 66 Moderate No. 2 32 Low No. 3 53 Moderate Prior to constructing fill slopes,keyways were constructed to depths varying between 2 feet and 12 feet in depth into firm formational soils. The bottom of the keys were a minimum of 15 feet wide and inclined a minimum of 2%back into slope- During earthwork construction,native areas to receive fill were scarified, watered, and compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90%) of maximum density. Subsequent fill soils were placed, watered,and compacted in 6 inch lifts. Benches were constructed in natural ground at intermediate levels to properly support the fill. To determine the degree of compaction,field density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D-1556 or D-2922 at the approximate horizontal locations designated on the attached Plate No. One entitled, "Test Location Sketch". A tabulation of test results and their vertical locations are presented on the attached Plate No, Two entitled "Tabulation of Test Results". Fill soils found to have a relative compaction of less the ninety percent(90%)were reworked until proper compaction was achieved. During grading, water seepage was encountered at the toe of the cut slope on Parcel F-1. A subsurface drain was constructed adjacent and parallel to the toe of slope a minimum of 3 feet below finish pad grade. The drain has a minimum of one percent(I%)fall and daylights off the pad to the south. Drain materials consisted of 4 inch perforated pipe centered in 3 cubic feet of minus I inch crushed rock per linear foot of pipe. The pipe and rock were wrapped in filter fabric to reduce future soil siltation of drain materials. COMMEIITDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS Continuous inspection was not.requested to verify fill soils are placed in accordance with current standard practices regarding grading operations and earthwork construction. Therefore,as economically feasible as possible, part-time inspection was provided. Hence, the following recommendations are based on the assumption that all areas tested are representative of the entire project. NOtTH COUNTY C'0MPACTIQTI EI`ICINEEWNGI V INC. Project No. CE-5693 Page 4 1.)Compacted fill and natural ground within the defined building areas have adequate strength to safely support the proposed loads. 2.) Slopes may be considered stable with relation to deep seated failure provided they are Properly maintained. Slopes should be planted with light groundcover (no gorilla ice Plant)indigenous to the area. Drainage should be diverted awav from the slopes to prevent water flowing on the face of slope. This will reduce the probability of failure as a result of erosion. 3.)Continuous footings having a minimum width of 12 inches and founded a minimum of 24 inches below lowest adjacent grade,will have an estimated allowable bearing value of 1500 pounds per square foot, 4.) Footings located on or adjacent to slopes should be founded at a depth such that the horizontal distance from the bottom outside face of footing to the face of the slope is a minimum of 8 feet. 5.)Plumbing trenches should be backfilled with a non-expansive soil having a swell of less than two percent(2%)and a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Backfill soils should be inspected and compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (m). 6.)Unless requested,recommendations for future improvements(additions, pools, recreation slabs,additional grading,etc.)Were not included in this report, Prior to construction, we should be contacted to update conditions and provide additional recommendations, 7.)Completion of grading operations was left at rough grade. Therefore,we recommend a landscape architect be contacted to provide finish grade and drainage recommendations. Drainage recommendations should include a two percent(2%) minimum fall away from all foundation zones. 8.)Expansive soil conditions observed during grading operations will require special recommendations to reduce structural damage occurring from excessive subgrade and foundation movement. -CoMpAcnori .EIYGI MERING, iris. Project No. CE-5693 Page 5 For Parcel F-1 and G-1 (High Expansive Soils) Recommendations set forth will reduce the probability of future damage and should be strictly adhered to: All isolated or continuous footings should be founded a minimum of 24 inches below lowest adjacent grade. Continuous footings should be reinforced with two#5 bars top and bottom(total of 4 bars). Steel should be.positioned 3 inches above bottom of footing and 3 inches below top of footing. Interior slabs should be a minimum of 5 inches thick and reinforced with #3 bars on 18 inch centers both ways. Slab reinforcement should be placed near the center of slab and extended through joints to provide a tension tie with perimeter footings. Garage slabs should be free floating. Slab underlayment should consist of visqueen installed at mid-point within a 4 inch sand barrier(2 inches sand, visqueen, 2 inches sand). Sand should be tested in accordance with ASTM D-2419 to insure a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Clayey soils should not be allowed to dry prior to placing concrete. They should be watered to insure they are kept in a very moist condition or at a moisture content exceeding optimum moisture content by a minimum of five percent(5%). Parcels 1,2 and 3 (Low to Moderate Expansive Soils) All continuous or isolated footings should be founded a minimum of 24 inches below lowest adjacent grade. Continuous footing should be reinforced with one #5 bar top and bottom. Steel should be positioned 3 inches above bottom of footing and 3 inches below top of footing. Interior slabs should be a minimum of 4 inches thick and reinforced with#3 bars on 18 inch centers both ways. Slab reinforcement should be placed near the center of slab and extended through joints to provide a tension tie with perimeter footings. Garage slabs should be free floating. Slab underlayment should consist of visqueen installed at mid-point within a 4 inch sand barrier(2 inches sand,visqueen, 2 inches sand). Sand should be tested in accordance with ASTM D-2419 to insure a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Clayey soils should not be allowed to dry prior to placing concrete. They should be watered to insure they are kept in a very moist condition or at a moisture content exceeding optimum moisture content by a minimum of five percent(5%). '.noa caunr�r COMPACT16 Er GINEER G, .Inc. Project No. CE-5693 Page 6 Prior to pouring of concrete,North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING,INC. should be contacted to inspect foundation recommendations for compliance to those set forth. UNCERTAINTY AND LLHITAIIONS In the event foundation excavation and steel placement inspection is required and/or requested, an additional cost of$170.00 will be invoiced to perform the field inspection and prepare a "Final Conformance Letter". If foundations are constructed in more than one phase, $120.00 for each additional inspection will be invoiced. It is the responsibility of the owner-and/or his representative to carry our recommendations set forth in this report. San Diego County is located in a high risk area with regard to earthquake. Earthquake resistant projects are economically unfeasible. Therefore, damage as a result of earthquake is probable -and we assume no liability. We assume the on-site safety of our personnel only, We cannot assume liability of personnel other than our own, It is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to insure construction operations are conducted in a safe manner and in conformance with regulations governed by CAL-OSHA and/or local agencies. if you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely-appreciated. Respectfully submitted, O��pFLSS/any North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. GE 713 �-- m LU XP 9/ /05 Rol ald K. Adams Dale R. R rF o �HO�o President Registered C1 Ate 393 Geotechnical Engineer 000713 RKA:.paj cc: (4)submitted NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING,INC. SOM TESTING 6 NOW PARCELS F-1 and G-1 ;' APPROX. SCALE WILDFLOWER SOUTH ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA Illp 91 l 7 1. �! 2oCnq -•t 1''�;jy.. , 1�.',' '` ' '•'' \�yr',,,/...�.,,.. \��.•x „•�.5 9 INt S xtlALL y� couE. c�C AZCEL G_1.. '! W EL=204. TEST 1A. rsvijol r4.1.f ;,-,•i,'rnatt:. •t �,., .}.,�, ..� tt:FTt X fa.N , _ 'f.p NYnR n'2'1 r) •;I f:d'C .:;r!�,..".a. . \\, .lr'.• •`:0.. \ `, T t .r''lOs.3� •' �ef�' �R,,." � tea; -:ta.-•clrry�.:' \`•�� -PARCEL F'' • `'^� =* ;� - f. r,.rAt( ^Ir.�. I�'L .1 S� P Aft r7l =217.0JA �� t r ' Ifrrriz Cl 1 nr{ .'__'- ti I � ��"Z � _.� ,f8i-�F -" :1f1.J pit �♦�.,,:_'f�``_ � �"� �/ ��1?•r(KJIt' - ? ;&iN..S T L EE 184' 717.0( ADE � ►tF'" r t� 12'x12"mktk,'• 11 �, fir„'- •,/`(,'/�y`�/ � _ A ALI .C1 r •� � ^1..` ,. _ ..__."e.o+r�aM�,,�an.M,,�..-r `.C/ f¢' • 'r,- ,.1 1, 33-IV - . :9R�nrl 'T•`f,iA'.Y� 1' I _ .71 -- . �\ �Y �4".•: [ t`�ll YT X14 .j i.,il!!YI. .. ' _ ;7 , Lii"Y 'M FItD TYPE i Iral•t1 , TEST LOCATION SKETCH PROJECT NO. CE-5693 PLATE NO.ONE a. I n S NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING,INC. SOIL TESTING PARCEL I of 99-207 APPROX. .SCALE WILDFLOWER ESTATES lit = 801 ENC:INITAS, CALIFORNIA Xow DITCH. .H 6075-C r k \ J� \c 25 1.A - r+,.,i :I%.wnv 1L�,,,;a1t'd�57-�2%1�iT _ y� t`� �.• •',. \ , H,.....r'• +I . .%. .+a� �'" `^"�.f _, •�"_ [.,� fat' ,. 26 TEST .% 30 'x 31 3.4 87 I 1 \\ ...�:4J'Y'i Y7 T. \ U rA�RCt. t —... \ PPO EL 251 - 41. '42 TEST. TES lit TEST rt' pR0pqgj:D..pOPPY NIUS LANI. ..t1APRDY£4iETn5-aER 67D9-� .'"''. TEST LOCATION SKETCH PROJECT NO. CE- 5693 PLATE NO. ONE-.A r 5 Tiolt" COQHTY CCMPACTION . EYGIN rido lric* --TAB ILATION OF JEST Test# Date Horizontal Vertical Field Moisture Dry Density Soil percent of Location Location, %Dry Wt. LB Cu,Ft. Type Compaction 11.0 09/26/01 See 250.0 17.8 108A VII 94.4 I I i Plate 251.0 18.5 106:8 VII 92.8 112 One 250:0 18.8 I.04.8 VII 91.9 113 251.0 17.5 105,0 VII 92,1 1.14 10/01/01 252.0 19.0 103.8 VII 90.2 11-5 253.0 17.7 106.3 VII 92.4 116 252.0 18.0 105.3 VII 91.5 11.7 253.0 18.8 105.6 VII 91.8 118 10/02/0) 252.0 17.8 108.3 VII 94.1 119 " 253.0 19.2 104.6 VII 90.9 120 - 252.0 18.5 106.8 VII 92.8 121 253.0 19.2 104.8 VIl' 91.1 122 10/15/01 304.0 12.6 117.4 VIII 92.4 123 304.0 12.5 118.3 VIII 93.1 124 304.0 11.6 118.1 VIII -92.9 *125 12//11/01 23+70 258,5 18.3 101.7 Ix 88.3 *126 22+40 269:5 20.5 100.1 IX 86.9 "127 21 +90 272.0 18.5 103.5 IX * 89:9 128 20+50 274.0 19.0 103.4 IX 99.8 *129 24+75 249.5 17.2 101.9 IX 89.3 *'130 12/13/01 29+75 249.5 15.1 104.1 IX 90.4 *131 23+70 258,5 14.3 104.8 IX 91.0 *132 22+40 269.5 16.1 103.9 iX 90.2 *-133 21 +90 272,0 15.6 104.4 IX 90.7 *134 20+50 274.0 14.0 106:7 IX 92.7 *135 12/17/01 25 + 10 250.0 17.8 103.9 rx g0 2 *136 23+97 258.0 15.6 104.1 1rX 90.4 *137 22+50 271.0 15.9 105.2 IX 91.3 *138 21 +00 275.5 14:1 105..8 IX 91.9 *139 12/19/0l 24+50 - V 15.4 109.7 ) *140 23 +00 .90.6 1' 17.2 109.1 II 90.1 *141 21 +50 * 21 +50 - 1' 14.9 112.6 II 93.0 142 20+50 - 1' 16.6 109.6 II 90.5 143 01/22/02 See 215.0 14.1 114.7 V 92,t 144 Plate One 215.0 15.0 112.5 V 90.3 REMARKS: See page 6 PROJECT NO. CE-5693 PLATE NO. TWO (page 4) i •5 1,. N40RTH COUH7Y =. Ct�NiPACTIOrI ENGINEERINd. IrIC _TABULATION F IESI RESULTS Test# Date Horizontal Vertical Field Moisture Dry Density Soil Percent of Location Location %Dry Wt. LB Cu.Ff. Type Compaction *145 01/24/02 24+50 2510 14.0 109.1 X 93.2 *146 23 +00 266,0 13,8 110,2 X 94.1 *147 21 +50 276.0 12.3 109.9 X 93.4 *148 01/28/02 24+50 254.0 12.2 110.6 X 94.5 *149 23 +00 268.0 10,9 111,4 X 951 *150 21 +50 278.0 12.3 110.5 X 94,4 *151 02104/02 24+80 252.0 15.3 1 09.1 II 90.1 *152 02/04/02 22+75 272.0 14.0 109.7 17 90.6 *153 cc 21 +60 277,0 15.8 112.7 II .93.1 *154 02/19/02 25+40 FSG 12.9 118.2 II 97.6 "1.55 " 24+60 FSG 15,0 117.1 II 97.6 *156 24+75 FSG 14,6 118,0 II 97.5 *158 23+ 10 FSG 12,8 119.2 II 98.5 *158 22+70 *159 22+70 FSG 13.2 117.4 II 97.0. 22+40 FSG 11.7 1 16.9 II, 96.6 160 21 +25 FSG 13.4 118.6 II 98.0 * *161 20+60 FSG 12.8 119.2 II 98.5 °i62 20±50 );SG 12.6 118.4 II 97.8 163 02/22/02 20+75 FGB 07.5 *164 tt 133.5 XI 96.7 21 +25 FGB 08.1 135.7 XI 98.3 *165 22+75 FOB 07.5 134.1 JG 97.1 *166 41 23+75 FGB 06.8 133.4 XI 97.3 *167 25+ 10 FGB 07.2 132.8 Xl 96.2 *168 03/13/02 21 +25 FGB 07.1 135.4 3a 98.1 *169 22+70 FGB 06,9 136,3 XI 98.1 *170 23 +81 FGB 06,4 134.0 XI 97,1 *171 25+ 10 FGB 07.4 133.7 XI 96.8 *172 04/16/02 204- 14 FSG 15.2 118.8 II 98.1 *173 04/18/02 20+ 15 FGB 06.8 131.7 XI 95.9 174 06/12/02 See 304.0 12.1 116.8 VIII 91.9 175 Plate 305.0 11,8 118.3 VIII 9- 176 One 304.0 12.5 115.9 VIII 93.2 177 305,0 10.9 120.1 VIII 94.5 178 06113!02 179 304.0 13.0 116,5 VIII 91.7 . " ,� 180 305.5 12.2 118.1 VIII 92.9 181 304,0 11.5 119.2 VII] 93.8 305.5 11.9 116,7 VIII 9118 REMARKS: See page 6 PROJECT NO. CE-5693 PLATE NO. TWO (page 5) S ; t 1 olt .,co TtTY ON �. T ENG1NEEMNG, INC. TABULATION OF 'PEST RESULTS Test# Date Horizontal Vertical Field Moisture Dry Density Son Percent of Location Location %Dry Wt. LB Cu.Ft. Type Cornp$ction 1 07/16/01 See 268.0 11.7 122.1 1 95.0 2 plate 270.0 11.1 122:0 1 94.9 3 07/17/01 One 272.0 13.3 118.7 I 92.3 4 274.0 12.9 116.8 I 90.8 5 07/19/01 275,0 13.0 116.9 I 90.9 6 276.0 12.2 .117.6 1 91.5 7 225:0 15.3 109.1 II 90.1 8 44 227,0 14.0 1.09.7 11 90,6 9 07/26/01 229.0 15.9 109.9 II 90.8 10 231.0 143 110.1 II 90.9 11 41 229.0 15.8 112.7 II 93.1 12 14 231.0 13.7 111.3 .11 9149 13 08/16/01 233.0 15.0 1.11.0 11 91.7 14 234,0 14.5 110.8 11 91.5 15 233:0 14.6 112.1 It 92,6 16 234.0 12.5 113.1 11 93.4 17 08120/01 235.0 13.6 113.8 III 91.1 18 237.0 13,i 114.4 111 91,6 19 235.0 13.3 114.8 III 91.9 20 237.0 14,4 112.9 111 90.4 21 08/22/01 239.0 13.5 113.0 III 90.5 22 241.0 13.0 115.3 111 92.3 23 239.0 12.8 115.3 111 92.3 24 241,0 12.1 117.3 III 93.9 25 08,124/01 243,0 19.4 99.3 IV 92.3 26 245.0 19.8 100.0 IV 93.0 27 243.0 19,6 99,1 IV 92.1 28 245.0 19,5 101.5 N 94.4 29 08/28/01 246.0 22.0 98,2 1V 91.3 .30 247.5 20.9 98:6 IV 91.7 31 246.0 19.8 99.6 IV 92.6 32 247.5 19,7 97.7 IV 90.8 .33 08/29/01 249:0 19.3 99,0 IV 92.0 34 250.0 21,0 98.9 IV 92.0 35 249.0 20.3 99.1 IV 92.1 36 250.0 21.0 100.9 IV 93.8 REMARKS: See page 6 PROJECT NO. CE-5693 PLATE NO. TWO NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. SOEUTESTING PARCEL 3 of 99-207 APPROX.. SCALE . WILDFLOWER ESTATES I" 50' ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA J, �'' ' .+-" r^ w .ice•• ✓ -.- }- -Jam• �, ,�\/ 112 �� ' 113 TEST ' ' 114 . f 106 A 107' 107TEST .- C4 s 3 116 PAO E pARC a54 i N t , 1/7 TEST o \ 1101 108 N .i 9 z557709� , TO ri APPROXIMATE LIMR T RN 6 REMOTE DEBRIS ANO E TO OR16NAL CONTOURS v 119 TEST 2 \ V - Y r 120 ti p 254 12/TES TEST LOCATION SKETCH PROJECT NO. CE- 5 6 9 3 PLATE NO. ONE_E t f NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING,INC. SOIL TESTING PARCEL 2 of 99-207 APPROX. SCALE . 'WILDFLOWER ESTATES 1'r 50' ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA y ~,+00 -':.. . .. t .LS. LAN --R4A PROPOSED POPPY HILLS LAND IMPROVEMENTS PER 6789-1 0 ...�.,�„ - --------- - TYPE BRUN :DfTCH / PER RSD. D-75 t% MIN { 'P 178 ! 174 EST ! l J 17 , A 71 \ PAD EL: 306 180 r i +% G 176 -�06 181 f co TEST s � 124 � 122 X123. TESL 304 o /� a TEST LOCATION SKETCH PROJECT NO. CE- 5 6 9 3 PLATE NO. ONE -B COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS Test# Date Horizontal Vertical Field Moisture Dry Density Soil Percent of Location Location . %Dry Wt. L13 Cu. 1~t. Type, Compaction 37 09/04/01 See 3491'0 19.9 99:8 IV 92.8 38 Plate 350.0 20.9 98.6 IV 91.7 39 09/05/01 One 349.0 19.3 102.2 IV 95.0 40 44 $. 350.0 17.6 101,1 IV 94.0 41 41 11 349.0 20.5 101.3 IV 94.2 42 CC 11 350.0 18.9 98.7 IV 91,8 43 09/06/01 180.0 12.9 113.1 V 90.8 44 182.0 11,9 113.7 V. 91.3 45 `< 184.0 11.9 114.9 V 9212 46 186.0 12.6 115.3 V 92.6 47 188.0 13.3 114,4 V 91.8 48 186.0 12.9 113,9 V 91.4 49 41 91 188.0 13.4 1 14.6 V 92.0 *50 09/07/01 25+00 249.0 13.7 109.5 II 90.4 *51 25+02 256.0 12.8 110.1 II 90.9 *52 25+05 253.0 13,4 114.2 II 94.3 53 See 190.0 14.2 112.8 V 90.6 54 Plate I92.0 12.7 116.5 V 93.5 55 One 190.0 13.7 1.13,4 V 91.0 56 192.0 11,6 114.9 V 92.2 57 194.0 123 115.3 V 92.6 58 " 196.0 13.5 113.1 V 90.8 59 194.0 14.1 114,0 V 91.5 60 '> 196.0 13.2 113.1 V 90.8 61 09 110/01 198.0 13.6 116.9 V 93.8 _62 11 200.0 14.5 116.7 V 93.7 63 198.0 14.4 113.1 V 90.8 64 '° 200.0 13.7 115.6 V 92,8 65 09/11/01 202.0 13.1 114,4 V 91.8 66 203.0 13.0 116.8 V 93.8 67 202.0 13.1 114.9 V 92.2 68 203.0 12.1 113,9 V 91.4 69 206,0 13.4 113.3 V 91,0 70 41 208.0 14.1 115.3 V 92.6 71 '" 206.0 13.1 115.1 V 92,4 72 208,0 11.9 115.2 V 92.5 REMARKS: See page 6 PROJECT NO. CE-5693 PLATE NO. TWO (page 2) 14ORTH 7'i■ COMPACTfO NGINEERING9 INC. TABULATION OF TESIRESULTS Test 0 Date Horizontal Vertical Field Moisture Dry Density Soil Percent of Location Location. %Dry Wt. L13 Cu.Ft. Type Compaction 182 01/21/03 See 204.0 RFG 11.8 114.5 V 91.9 183 Plate 204.0 RFG 10.1 113.9 V 91.4 184 One 217.0 RFG 09.3 115.5 V 92.7 185 217.0 RFG 10.2 112.8 V 90:6 186 251.0 RFG 15.5 99.5 IV 915 187 251,0 RFG 16,2 101.8 IV 94.6 188 `< 251.0 RFG 16.8 103.5 IV -96.2 189 254.0 RFG 14.8 107,8 VII 93.7 190 254,0 RFG 13,1 109.3 VII 95.0 191 306:0 RFG 10,5 118.3 VIII 93.1 192 306:0 RFG 11.2 1173 VIII 92.2 REMARKS: NOTE:Tests marked with an asterisk(")are not a part of this report. They were taken on subdivision road Improvements and utillties and are presented in our report dated January 29,2063 RFG=Rough Finish Grade PROJECT NO. CE-5693 PLATE NO. TWO (page 6) noRTH`COUR c , ► CTIQn N± rnEERING C. - TABIULLAIION OF TAT RESULTS OPTIMUM IyIO T I EIMAXIMCJ_>WI DENCiTY On DESG mR_ TION TYPE MAX. DRY DENSITY OPT. MOISTURE (LB. CU.FT) (fo DRY YM Brown Beige Silty Gravelly Clay 1 128.5 09.4 Tan Brown Silty Sandy Clay II 121.0 12.8 Light Tan Beige Silty Clayey Sand 111 124.8 11.0 .Light Beige Fine Sandy Silt N 107.5 18.8 Tan Brown Silty Gravelly Clayey Sand V 124.5 11.4 Dark Brown Silty Sandy Clay VI 118.3 13.0 Light Brown Medium Coarse Silty Clay VII 115.0 15.0 Beige Gravelly Sandy Clay 'VIII 127. 09,9" Light Brown Silty Sand IX 115.1 12.8 Beige Tan Medium Coarse Sand (Import) X 117.0 12.0 Light Beige Gravelly Silty Sand (Class II Base) XI 138.0 08.0 PROJECT NO. CE-5693 PLATE NO. THREE 4 Cc NORTH Coct1YTY x3 "GiEERi1�IGr, INC. -T'ABi TFON ��+" EXPANSiC)NO 1AL V. CONDITION INITIAL MOISTURE 90% Remold 90% Remold 90% Remold 90% OISTURE(%) 18.9 11.5 AIR DRY MOISTURE(%j 14.0 15:0 915 FINAL MOISTURE % 9.5 8.2 6.9 ( } 30.1 21.5 260 .19.7 DRY DENSITY(PCF) 96.7 112.1 LOAD(PSF) 150 150 103.,5 114.3 SWELL(%) 6.6 1 S0 150 EXPANSION INDEX 8'2 5.3 3.2 66 82 53 32 Iry x� �EeT Fau Ct2NDI7ION Remold 90% Remold 90% Remold 90'o Remold.90% ANGLE INTERNAL FRICTION 26 28 COHESION INTERCEPT(PCF) 260 28 30 250 320 200 PROJECT NO. CE-5693 PLATE NO. THREE (continued) P RW0H0JNG REQUESTEQ gY When Recorded Mail To: ') 34144 0OC # 2001`005904 FEB 01 , 2001 9 : 29 AM 2oo1.006 soas Std! DIEGO(WI y RECORDS REORDER r S OFFICE City Clerk GREGORY J. 8XITH+ M1tIT1+ aORDER City of Encinitas ) FEES; 62a I ( 505 S, Vulcan Avenue ) f " Encinitas,CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP Assessor's Parcel No.264-091-59 Project No.:99-207 TPM A. Alvin F. Mayo & Nanette Mayo ("OWWINERS" hereinafter) are the owners of Property which is located at the southeast terminus of Wildflower Drive "PROPS real and which is described as follows: ("PROPERTY"hereinafter) See Attachment"A"which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of the approval of permit 99-207 TPM by the City of Encinitas ("CITY hereinafter),OWNERS hereby covenant and agree for the benefit of CITY to the terms and conditions of the permit as follows; comply with See Attachment 000, dated July 27,2000 Planning Commission Resolution No.PC 2000-43 ,which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit the future owners,encumbrances,successors,heirs,personal representatives transferees of _ , nsferees and assigns of the respective parties. _----_ ----(---m C0'91C0v199207tpm.cov r°�1. � t AUG 3 2006 D. OWNERS agree that OWNERS,duties 3413 #0 ies and obligations under this Covenant are a lien Upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property bill of the PROPERTY an g g p Arty tax y past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant,the Prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable a fees,from the other party. attorneys, F. Failure of OWNERS to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall co consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. constitute G. Upon OWNERS' satisfaction of OWNERS' duties and obligations contained h r " OWNERS may request and CITY shall execute a Satisfaction of Covenant. a ern, H. By action of the City Council,CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted performance of this Covenant,the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNERS. p by the 2 C D:gko v199207tpm.co v ACCEPTED AN 3 416 op D AGREED OWNERS Dated 0 by e Dated � by (Notarization of O WNERS'signatures is attached.) CITY OF FNCINITAS Dated . -30-y, by � e (Notarization not required) Bill Weedman City Planner 3 CD_91cov/992071 pm.cov 3417 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of ORALNGE ss. On 01/26/01 H, before me NANCY WARNER, NOTARY PUBLIC f Oate personal{ appeared A I,V I N F. Namo artlf k or Officcr l!.y•Jane ooa,Notary PuW c? t y AP MAYO AND NANETTE MAYO, TRUSTEES Name($)Of Signe,la) personally known to me r ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence r NANCY t{.WARNlit to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are Commuulon#i t893D7 subscribed to the within instrument and °��Ilfarrtia acknowledged to me that he/she/the executed MY Comm. the same in his/her/their y cuted �� r capacity(ies), and that b authorized y his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. ' TNESS my hand and official seal. PfOce Notary Scat Above ipn ure of Notary Punic Though the information below is not required by P imay J' and could prevent fraudulent removal ad at t Persons lya�� r document Descriptivn o}Attached 3ocumert reattachment of form aan erm h Title or Type of Document: ` Document Date: -------�i Number of pages: Signer(s)Other Than Named Above: ' Capacity(ies)Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: f 0 Individual ❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s)., C1 Partner— t Tl of m„�hve ❑Limited ❑General 1+ 0 Attorney in Fact L, Trustee O Guardian or Conservator r O Other: f Signer is Representing: O 1957 NOfionaJ Notary aasoc+afion•9350 Do$oto Ave.,P.O.a0X 2402•Chelivronh•CA 913 W . Prod.No.5907 Roomer;Call Toil-Free;-SIX1878.6827 3418 ATTACHMENT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TO R SHIP 13 ANGE 3 WEST. SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENC TON SOUTH, OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL COUNTY THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FILIAL PLAT COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID C IS SHOWN ON CITY OF ENCINITS TRACT NO, 88-183 ACCORDING TO MAP 882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CENTERLINE NO. 12 THEREOF COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991, SAID POINT LYfNG ON THE ARC OF A 3 RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY,A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT 50 00 FOOT SOUTH 78°26'42'° EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION BEARS CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 018'44''; THENCE N OF SAID WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 E SOUTH BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIUS CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE THE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL AID 7°36'54''; THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH l0°1 ' THENCE THENCE SOUTH 4°38'28'' WEST 178.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH ANGLE T; 5 09 WEST, 61.16 FEET; FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 034'36" WEST, 263.59 TO THE TRUE POINT OF g I3 33°16'30" EAST, 260.16 THENCE NORTH 34°58'38" WEST, 78.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°32'31" WEST. FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THI? BEGINNING; (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.0 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST 3800 FEET THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 4 009'24" WEST 624.00 FE QUARTER; TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER TfIEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY FEET LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER SOUTH 84 005'09" EAST, 1362.53 FEET T O THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERLY 650.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY NG T4IE LINE THEREOF NORTH I°40'36" EAST. 419.03 FEET; THENCE LEAVING LAST LINE NORTH 89°55'44" WEST, 420.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 50019'1 p, WEST,AST SAID FEET; THENCE NORTH 78°39'37" WEST, 155.67 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34°58'38" .06 25 273.23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. WEST, 4 CD:g/cov/99207tpm.cov 3419 4TTAcH&fEfa DESOLv nON NO PC 2OW-43 APPROVING ooL UnON OF�C!' y OF ENCnUTAS PL��ll1T11�II1i REMAINDER PA TENTATIVE PARCEL IRAp TO CREATE FOURpR ON OF WILDFLOWER RpA VACANT�PERTY LOCATED AT TAE AND A ZONE ANb T8E C'UL7�A D BLS OVVE S (Case No.99-207 TPM;APN:264.091.59) RLAY ZONE Mayo Family a mq� for consideration of a Tentative Paz+cei Y nM / San Di by Bluff Over four paten and aR nF` �io aallOw for the subdiyig- -- of a I s the bated within the d Chapter 24 (Subdivisions) of the En Muaici�on 30.34.030(Intern Hillside I Inland Bluff Overlay �aUNa�Code, for property Zone, and the Renal Residential(RR)Zoning Y Zone, the Cent City of Encinitas,Ieg�y described as: District of the Oiiven Co�� Overlay ty Area of flit (SEE AT 1'ACI �."A') applicatio WHEREAS,7�20 p# JmmiWon coWucted a noticed public time all those desiring to be heard wale 8 on the and R'aEREAS,the Plarinl Commission considered,without station: l. The J>tiY 27,2000 a8em'a Tepoz to the PWiniag Commission with exhibits; 2. The Genead Plan,Municipal Code and ' associated Land Use Maps.' 3• Oral evidence submitted at the homing; 4• Written evidence submitted at the Ong, $• Praposed Tentative Parcel City of Encinitas on June l��8 of one(1)Page,dated received by the 000;end >the Punning Commission 24{Subdivisions}of the Encinitas Munici de: the f011ow109 findings Ptnsuant to Chapter Pal Code: (SEE ATTACHMENT"B'7 NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLVED that Of F�cinitas here app cation 99 207 Tpjy •the- Planning hereby approves li u�n8 Gommi.�,sion of the City subject to the following conditions: (SEE ATTACHMENT-C!") RE IT FMIUR RESOLVED judgment finds that this Project�not have�a ithe PIauuitig Co Snificant adverseeffect o� its imkMdent envinnnmeut and 7 3420 adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration (CEQA)Guidelines. This project wil!not ind► dvrt �Califoraia Environmental Quality Act wildlife resources as defined ' Y emulatively have an adverse effect on Certificate of Fee Exemption shall be made with De Minimus Impact Code,. �� therefore, a Impact Frndings. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of July,2000,by the"following vote,to AYES: wit: Commissioners Bagg,Birnbaum,Crosthwaite,Jacobson,Patton . NAYS: None ABSENT: Noce ABSTAIN: Notre Alice Jacobson,C of the Encinitas Pl mmission ATTEST: .Holder Community Development Director. NOTE: This action is subject to Chapter 1.04 of the Municipal Code,which for legal challenges. specifies time limits 2 ATTACIMENT"A" 3421 Resoladon No.PC 2000-43 Case No.W207 TPA LEGAL DESCREMON - THAT PORTION OF .TBE SOUTTIWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8 �' SOUTH,. RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO > OWNSHIP13 ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALMEIFQ � THE CITY OF OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:. ACCORDING TO THE COMMENCING AT TREE CENTER OF CENTERLINE IS SHOWN ON CITY OF'LINE WILDFLOWER DRIVE AS SAID MAP WHEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN WITS TRACT NO. 88-183 ACCORDING TO FRE SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1199 SAM POINT LY G p Y RECORDER OF 350.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAV$ WESTERLY A N ThE ARC OF A SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 7802642» EAST; ' RADIAL LINE TOUGH PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL THE SOUTHERLY 6°18'44'; THENCE SOUTH 17°52'42" WEST, 16.24 FEET; ' g;IJCE�ANGLE OF EAST, 144.98 FEETTI'O THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 72 07 58 CONCAVE NORTHERLY. THENCE ALON4 ,� 400.00 FOOT RATJIUS TROUGH A CENTRAL 'ANGLE OF 7 ON(i"• ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET' SOUTH 10°15'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET• > THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE THENCE SOUTH 33°16'30" EAST, 26 T 6LFECETSObMI 4 38 28 WEST 178.72 FEET; 263.59 TO THE TRUE PONT OF BEG ' THENCE SOUTH 54034'36" WEST' FEET, TO THE SOUTH 74'032'31 T OF B IN�G; THENCE NORTH 34°5838" CORNER OF THE SO �T, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY 78.97 LINE)OF THE WESTERLY�'RLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG T STERLY LINE) SAID S HE E S38.00 FEET(MEASURED ALONG THE SO WESTERLY Q TER; WF�NCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THIYcREOF SOUTH 4°09'24" WEST, 624.00 FEET TO THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THE SOUTHEASTERLY SSTERAST OAR T�REOF; 84°05'09" EAST, i362.S3 FEET' TO THE SO QUARTER SOUTH 767.55 FEET {MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHg}u,y FEET(MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY STBRLY LINE) 01;. THE EASTERLY 650.00 THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINTHEREOF LINE) OF SAID SOUTI�ST QUARTER; FEET, THENCE LEAVING LAST SAID LINE NORTH OR 1'040'36r S �T, 419.03 THENCE NORTH 50 019'11" WEST, 206.25 NORTH THENCE > 420.32 FEET; 155.67 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34°58'38" WEST, 273 EET TO T H 78°39'37" WEST BEGINI�'1TtG, TRUE POINT OF 3 3422 ATTACIE UNT kg" Resolution No.PC 2000-43 Case No.99407 TPM f"INDINGS FOR A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP STANZA D: Section 66474 of the California Government Code authorized agency approve an application for a Tentative that the information presented in the application d MaP unless, based agency makes any of the followin fin during the public g�ring, the g d,ngs of fact: ring, the authorized a. That the proposed map is not consi specified in Section 65431 of the Subdivisi a Map Act.bte general and specific plans as FEE(!: The Tentative Paneel MaP PZIDPoses to subdivide a I t%b7 single-family residential parcels and a Remainder Parcel. Tye acre Parcel into four, a minimum parcel size of 3.01 the protect been approved average (net) parcel size of 3.18 acres. The pm'der lot is 2.19 net acres em Specific Plan. p Ject does not lie within the ndue area of any 'scnss o The pmjet ".mplies with the m General Plan for the Rural Residenti� ��-raage denstrty I=tatioun of the development standards for the (RR) Zoning District. Consistent with the width,lot depth,and Zone, the project conforms to the re standard 2 access standat�ds. 'he proJe�has been requirements for lot minimum lot size. Average Lot sizes within consistent with the 3.I8 acres. The design of the thin the subdivision measure conformance with Proposed Parcels can support fire residences in standards for the R Zonebie development standards related to setbacks and lot eoverag RR Zone. e onclusio : Therefore the Plannin consistent with the City ofEncinitas $ Commission finds the Tentative Parcel imp be General Plaa b• That the design or improvement of the applicable genera}and specific plans. Proposed subdivision is not consistent with acts: The design of the Tentative Parcel Ma pa='s and a Remainder Parcel. P proposes four, single.family residential conformance with The four pals can support any residences in within the area of the development standards r the Zone. The Project does not lie Specific Plan Discae� All dew requirements development standards for e RR for the project requited , the Municipal Cade Parcel Map. The Tentative Parcel M arc accommodated by the design of the Tentative with building setbacks and lot coverage designed so that future residences will comply erage standards for the RR Zone. Conclasioa: Therefore, the Planning Commission finds design is consistent with the City's General Plan. the Tentative Parcel Map's 4 3423 C. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development. East•+: The Tentative Parcel Map indicates that ' provisions for future utilities exist, access r0atlway UnProvements and an the future residences wi or �n be extended to the site, to adequately service thin the subdivision. Disco ion: The project is deli requirements of the RR Zo gned' or has been conditioned, to satisfy development project review ring ae t District No evidence has been submitted dew the development ent press to indicate that the site is not Physicall y Proposed. Letters'from, the pliv y suitable for the Cardiff Saaitation District se enham Municipal Water Distdct, th, the San Die to u • (sewer s�ce), the Encinitas Union Hi union �� school ')!strict have been provided�Sehool District and agencies can provide service to the subdivision, indicate that these be extended to the site by the Ci o °thy n�eY public services can provider. tJ' f Encinitas or by the appropriate public utility Coacl as;un: Tlyeteforc, the Pl suitable to accommo arming Commission finds that the site is �e the type of development a�ad uses p�s�by the physically d• That the site is not Project. physically suitable for the proposed duty of development. Fack: The Tentative Parcel M Remainder Parcel which comply aP proposes four, single-fa y re-'6dential wth for the RR Zoning District and h4unicip19 Cede stannnddayrddssge density standard Parcels u and SAO > euss'o The pioojw complies with the slope adjusted net acre density standard for the RR Zoning District, No evidence has been re, ma�cimucn-range Planning review Process to indicate that the site is not physically iticeived during the density. y suitable for the proposed COIIeIR —102: Therefore, the Pl conforms to the d Ong Commission finds that the Tentative Pahl Map suitable for the density requirements for the RR Zoning District and that the site is Proposed density of development. e. That the design of the subdivision or substantial environmental dam the proposed improvements are likely to cause their habitat. age or the or avoidably injure fish or wildlife or Facts: An Envirormzerctel Initial Environmental Consultant for the rgjec anent �) has &1° d by the City's California Envirunn�entat P%1ect, Scott Euglehorn 8t Associates Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The EIA has fomvnd that the Project, as designed, mitigated, and conditioned to conform to will not pose a significant impact upon the environment and a development standards Declaration is recommended for adoption, Mtigated Negative V,40-5—sin: The property does not su which could support wetlands PPort any sensitive habitat or mirage courses Tentative Parcel Ma �y°uld be impacted by the development design Map- of the mitigation measures of the established by the EIA 5 •, and adherence to Municipal Coded 3424 pacts to a level below sil°pmeat standards will any environmental im gnificance. ---gig: "Therefore, tt�e Plannin subdivision and proposed im mvementsg Commission finds that the design of the or substantially will not cause substantial environmental damage Y and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. f. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is likely to cause . public health problems. Serious F_ac : The four proposed parcels cats be smryiced b Providers as indicated by the`will Service»left= Y � utility and service District, the Cardiff Sanitation from the Olivenhain Municipal Water District and the San D1e District(sewer service),the Encinitas Union High School 8wto Union High School District. All other necessary services can be extended to the site by the City of Encinitas or by the �' Public Utility provider. appropriate public Discns,�ion: bVith the emulsion of these services indicate that a serious public health , no evidence has been submitted to accordance with the us Problem would occur should a Final pal Map, in approved Tentative Parcel Map,be recorded on the property. ConcJ�tsion: Therefore, the Pl subdivision on the site can adequately fends that the design of the project will not cause equately serviced with necessary utilities and that the any serious public health problems. 8• Tlrat the design of the subdivision or the easements, acquired by the public at large) forte of improvements will coo ict with the Proposed subdivision. this 8 > access through or use of,property within if it finds that �nection, the authorized agency may alternate easements, for access or for use, will be Y approve a map- will be substantially equivalent to ones Provided, and that these subsection shall apply only to Previously �u by the public. This easements of record or to easements established b judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority legislative body to determine tY is hereby Y use of property within the proposed subdivision. large has acquired easemeayLs thrn g�or Fac : Tile Tentative Parcel Map indicates that adequate and future parcels can be access to the existing property provided in conformance with City standards. easements for utilities or access are indicated a the Tentative Parcel other known remain for access or public utilities. Map and will Disenssiou: The design of the Tentative Parcel Ma for utilities or roadways. All p will not conflict with any easements Parcel Map� roadways- ��City easements and utilities will be shown on the Final tY standards and the servicing utility's requirements. Cenc--- Jasion: Therefore, the Planning Comrnission finds subdivision and future improvements conflict that the design of the the subject property nor hinder access ton or of any public easements ihro subdivision. , Property within the proposed b 3425 ATI'ACW*MW"C,, Resolettiaa Na._PC 2000-43 Case No.99 207 TPM PROJECT CONDMONS OF APPROVAL Project No.: 94-207 TPM Applicant:Mayo Family Trust/San Diegaito Engineering Location: Terminus of Wildflower Road SCI SPECS a CoAmrriFnwo. SC2 This approval will expire on Judy 27, 2002 at 5:00 PM, two ears this project; unless the conditions have been met or an Y after the approval of approved pursuant to the Muriel extension of time has been pal Code. SC5 This project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application and proposed Tentative Parcel Map consisting of one(1)page, dated received by the City of Encinitas on June 14, 2000, and these items shall not be altered without express authorization by the Community Development Department. SCA Consistent with the Hillside/Inland Bluff Overlay stands (M.C. Sec. 30.34.030.B.5 Prior to the issuance of a Ong pmt for, the ) Parcels 3, 4,and the Remainder Parcel if project, the rernaiader of the areas on greater, which are not impacted b { developed in the future)having 25%slope and conservation easement, or sl�ati d gig' s be placed within an open space grading of the sic gg restricted,to preclude any future development or slopes.' Si a and fencing shall be erected along the open space easement line closest to the developable portion of the parcels, and along the recreational trail easement to the satisfaction ofthe Community Development 1hP�n an the recreational and to separate them from the developable Department eon the recreational trail SCB Prior to the issuance of a plan for review and Ong the property owner shall submit a landscape approval by the Community Development Proposed graded slopes. All new slopes Department for all non-evasive exotic (non-native) plantings'S planted with drought_toleraut native or Plant List" contained within accordance with the Fuel Modification thin the W"dland/Urban Interface Development Standards by the San D1ego County Fire Chief s to address fire suppression Association. This condition is intended ppression buffer area provisions while utilizing more materials that are compatible with the ad' natural landscape conservation.- )scent open .space areas designated for SCD The Mitigation Monitoring and Repo Pro Environmental Initial Assessment for this project shall be implemented anted by the planning and construction of the approved project. The following��eII during t`s required: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Property pent'ow=shall cause to be recorded a coven 3426 establishes an o ant, acceptable to the Community Development ' disturbed b the space moment over all steep slopes and the D o Cr which Y Proposed�mg• Previously landscaped ESCOadido Crock not maintained in good condition. If the existin slopes within this area shall be native slope landscaping on the g or fvtu owner fails to maintain the non- clear non-native lent parcels, a future plan may be approved by P materials on the previously the City to slopes in native sage scrub and coax P� slopes $ad nwegctate the accordance with the 1� code andpatible non-native drought tolerant species in upon of re`, methods. The existing irrigation sy�� P�velY, by shall be removed revegetated plant materalsg(except ago Bing or other removal of native or Iaudform,grading, trencl�g for utilities with the fire ), attera#ion of vehicle access {ex t for ,erection or placement of structures of any ldad, slope or biological resources r catronal trail maintenance), or B• within the o n all other dii twhance of open Space easements shall be prohibited. SCE Plans,specifications,and supporting the satisfaction iO the d documents for all improvements shall subdivider s)WJ install, or Engineer. prior to approval of the Final pa be MV to provided b law, agree to uystatl and secure with the Y > 1mprovorrrertts shown on the Tentative FP priate security as improvements to the satisfaction of the Ch En a Fanrel and the following Drive and Wildflower Vaal City . (1) Private roads of Wfl�ower easements shall be reserved o the F {2) public Private a � and utility Parcel Map For offsite parcels. SCF All structures constructed on the subject systems to the satisfaction of the City of E��1 Fire p and maintain"Class A"roofing Prevention Dept�ent. g G' S��tD.�4NDITION ; . CONTACT THE COMMUNM bE'ELOPMENT COMPLIANCE VnM THE F0LLOW1NG CONDITIONS:DEp ARTMENT REGARDING G2 This approval may be appealed to the City of this approval in accordance with C Council within 10 calendar days from the crate �Pter 1.12 of the Municipal Code. 64 Poor to grading Permit issuance,. ProP"Y to be recorded. Said cov the applicant shall cause a covenant regarding real grant of approval and shall be of f t shall set forth the terms and conditions of this Development Director. form and content satisfactory to the Commuai ty GS Approval of this request shy not waive compliance with an Code and all other applicable City regWations in effect at the time of Bah Muni issuance unless specifically waived herein. ding Permit Gl3 The appumat shall Pay develo meat but not be limited to: P p fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, School Fees, T Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and S c Mitigation Fees, Flood Control Mitigation Fees, fig, Fees, and Fine Mitigation/Cost Recovery S ees, Park Mitigati on made Prior to building Permit issuance to the satisfAaetion of the Community fees shall be DeveIopment . . s 3427 . and Engineering Services . Community Development DepaIgnent nom' �e applicant is advised to contact the Services Department � regarding Park Mitigation Fees, the Engineering Districts) see g8 plood Control sand Traffic Fees, applicable School Recovery Fees a the School Fees, the Fire Department gadon/Cost applicable Utility Departments Fire Mi#i and/or Sewer Fees. ty epartments or Districts regarding Water M2 All project Wading shall conform with the Map. In cases where no approved Tentative Map or Tentative Parcel 8 Is proposed at the time of the Tentative MWrenta ive Parcel Map, or in cases where the grading plan later submitted is not ca approved Tentative Map/Tentative parcel with the design reviewpermit for ' applicant shall be v' ii+ai to obtain a grading prior to issuance of grading permits. M4 The Property owner/developer SWI obtain design review homes to be constructed on the Lots resulting from the approved Permits p,as w�as all related th sfte e approved . If the Property owner/developer elects to develop the lots resulting from map as custom homesites,the design review permit waived by the Community Development requirement may be the Municipal Code. The Department Pursuant dvi to Section 23.08.030(7)of Development property ownereve o me is advised to-contact the Community p Department at such three as development of the subject pro determine whether a design review permit win be Ply is planned to this condition shaft be recorded in the Office b the t qty Recorder covenant b notice to future purchasers of the site. nstructive M6 Street naives shall be approved by the City prior to the recordation of the final street addresses shall be provided by the Commt WIX Development Department and the issuance of building permits. went prior to 131 BUILDING COLllrrtr%w- CONTACT THE ENCZMTAS BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH TIDE FOLLOWING CONDITION; B 2 The applicant sbaIf submit a comple0e set of comstruon plans to the Budding plancheck Processing. The submittal shall include a Soils/Geoieehnieal DYVtruct calculations, and State Energy compliance documentation the 24 . st:afJ include a site plea, a foundation l (Title Construction plans section d Pan, floor and roof framing p� Moor plan(s), eWL%exterior elevations,and materials specifications. Submitted p�mw show compliance with the latest adopted editions of the California Bail Building Code with California Amendment, the California Mechanical,Code(The Uniform Plumbing Codes). Thom comments are Preliminary Electrical and be completed prior only. A comprehensiveplancheck will Permit issuance and additional technical code requirements identified and cbaages to the originally submitted plans may be-requited, naay be F1 FIRE CONDI'TYON�; CONTACT TM ENCUUTAS F11RE DEPARTMENT REGARDING GOMPLIANC Fs -Wrm THE FOLLOWING CoNDMONS: __ 9 3428 F2 ACCESS ROADWAY DIMENSIONS: Fire apparatus unobstructed paved width of not less access roadways s� have an ' of act Less than 13 feet 6 inches, than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance shall-not be less Paved :Access to one(1)single famil than 16 feet of avert width. y residence F4 TURNAROUNDS: All dead-end Erne serving four(4)or more dwellin units access roadways in excess of ISO feet in length or sac radius for public streets shall complybe Provided read sstanndarad.,. St ectsc. The aed to - private road standards where a turnaround is Streets cow Paved radius of not less thaw 36 feet. shall have a cul-de-sac with a with City road standards. Cul-de-sacs in commercial projects shall Chief as needed to aceom � � t�of'turnarounds may be considered by the Fire P Pose of the Fire Code. FS GRADE: The gradient for a fire apparatus roadway shall not exceed 20.0%. Grades mitigation shall be cllrene or decline)shall not be permitted without m t Minimal installation of automatic fire spr�et Bon. accessed by such a roadway. systems for structures F7 RESPONSE MAPS: Any develop hydrants, went that by virtue of new structures necessitates fire roadways, or similar features, shall be compatible with current Department required to provide a map in a format fee for updating all p Department response Ping s cervips,ces,and shall be charged a reasonable FS COMBUSTELE MATERL4LS: prior to the delivery of combustible Project site; water and sewer systems shall a delivery materials on the connected to the public water and sewer sy�s. In Y l tests and be shall be in p provide a addmon, the first lift of asphalt vehicles. Said access shall be maintained to the satisfaction off the��ent, F9 POST`.f NG OF ROADWAYS: MPerlY identified as per Fire Department standardsEmergency access roadways when required shall be . F10 OBSTRU"ONS(ACCESS ROADWAYS) All traffic feet in width during construction and s c lanes shall be a minimum of 24 during construction in accordance with the niform � and life of obstructions F 11 FIRE HYDRANTS&FIRE FLOWS: The applicant shall 'lumber, and location satisfactory rovide fire hydrants of a type water agceCy the ry to the Encinitas Fire Departmem, A letter from the available. Fire hydrants g axes shall provided that states the required fire flow is led shatl be of a bronze type. A two-sided blue reflective read market shall be installed s. the rooad surface to indicate the location of the fire hydrant for approaching fire apparatus. F12 FUEL MODIFYCATION ZONES; breaks to the satisfaction of the Enc�e�pl�t shy provide and tnaint� �/�l Part sent. 10 3429 F13 ADDRESS NUMBERS: Address numbers shall be placed - them to be clearly visible from the she fronting m location that will allow The numbers shall conform to Fire height of the address Department Standards. F14 ADDRESS NLAWERS FOR STRUCTURES LOCATED OFF ROADWAY: Where structures are loeated'off a roadway on tong driveways, a monumeut marker shall be placed at the.entrance where the driveway intersects the main roadway, be affilc address numbers with height conforming to Fire Department standards shall edeto this marker. F1SA AUTOMATIC DUPLEXES: FIRE SPRI 'KbL"R SYSTEM - SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND Structures shall be protected by an automatic fire to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. ply for the aut re sprinkler system installed shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of building sprts. system dwg permits. E 1 ENG><NEERXNG CONDITIONS CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES .DEPARTMENT REGARD COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ING E2 All City Codes, regulations, and policies in effect at the time of buitdin issuance shall apply. g/grading permit EG1 GradinS_Condihong EG2 No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to .recordation of the final �• E03 The.developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. EG.4 The grading for this project is defined in Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas A4unicipai Code. Grading shall be performed under the observation of a civil engineer whose it shall be to coordinate site inspection and testing o responsibility the approved 8 �� compliance of the work with 8g plan, submit required reports to the Engineering Services Director and verify compliance with Chapter 23.24 of the Encinitas Municipal Code. EG5 No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. E06 A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and a separate issued for the borrow or disposal site if located within the city limits. S permit EG7 All newly created slopes within this project shall be no steeper than 2:1. _ EG8 A soilstgeological/hydrautic report (as applicable) shall be engineer licensed by the State of California to prepared be o qualified . submitted and approved prior to Final Parcel Map work Such report shall be P appro al. 11 3430 EG9 Prior to hauling dirt or construction this project the developer aterials to any proposes construction site within Services Director for the submit to and receive approval from the Engineering conditions and �°P°� Sul route. The developer shall comply with all requirements the Engineering Services Director may impose with regards to the hauling operation. EGI O in accordance with Section 23.24.370 (A)of the Municipal Code,no be issued for work occurring ,� October 1st of an Ong permit shall following year, unless the plans for such work include details o f April 1 5th of the including desisting basins or other temporary Protective measures, may be deemed necessary drainage or control measures or both, private Property from 5�3' by the field inspector to protect the adjoining public and which may originate from site or result from or the deposition of mud or debris ding orations. ED] Drai"ge Conditions ED2 The developer shall exercise special care during prevent any offsite siltation. The develo h the construction phase of this project to shall construct temporary per' shall provide erosion control measures and P �y desiltation/detention basins of approved by the Engineering type, size and location as shall be shown and eenng Director. The basins and erosion control measures satisfaction of the specified on the grading plan and shall be constructed to the Engineering Services Director prior to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the removal of any basins or facilities so constructed shall be protected by additional drainage the area served other methods re a facilities, slope erosion control measures and 9�or approved by the Engineering Services D' shall maintain the temporary basins and erosion control measuresrfor a �e developer satisfactory to the Engineering Services Director and shall mod of time and satisfactory performance through cash d guarantee their maintenance suitable to the Engineering Services Director. eposit and bonding in amounts and types ED3 A drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water within the subdivision, and all surface waters that may flow onto the subdivision ter orginaei m adjacent lands, shall be required. Said structures as required by the Engine drainage system shall include any easements and drainage. Services Director to properly handle the ED5 The developer shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to map for this project or shall construct approval of the final Drainage Plan and City of Encinitas S use��S in c nfOman a with the Master Director. by the Engineering Services ED6 The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless covenant regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the Final Parcel M g g ap. ED7 Concentrated flows across driveways and/or sidewalks shall not be permitted, 12 3431 ED8 The drainage system shall be designed to 'ensure that runoff resulting fmm a I00- ear SNuency storm under developed conditions is equal to or less than the storm of the same frequency and duration under existing conditions. Bo runoff and a hour storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin our and 24 necessary to accomplish the desired rests. capacities es ESl $greet Conditinn� ES2 A registered Civil Engineer or a licensed.land surveyor shall provide a signed statement that: "The existing private roads of access to the within the easements protect are the benefit of the land division." ES3 The developer shall.niake an offer of dedication to the City for all ub easements required by these conditions or shown on the Tentative Parr el he and shall be made by a certificate on the final Parcel Map for this project. The offer so Off cred shall be granted to the City flee and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City- Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated, ES4 Reci proms access and/or maintenance agreements shall be Provided ens Parcels over private roads, drives or parking areas ands access to all satisfaction of the Engineering Services Director. main thereof to the ES8 The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved 'by the Engineering Services Director prior to approval of the Final Parcel Map for this project. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Encinitas Standards based on R-value tests, The standard improvement plan check deposit is required. ES9 Some improvements shown on the Tea located offsite on m r$tive Map and/or required by these conditions are property which neither the City nor the subdivider has sufficient We or interest to permit the improvements to be made without ac The subdivider shat! conform to Municipal acquisition of title or interest, improvements and acquisition of property Section 24.16.070 regarding offsite property interest. EU 1 Utilities EU2 The developer shall comply with all the fules,regulations respective utility agencies regarding services to the prof d design requirements of the EU3 The developer shad be responsible for coordination with S.D.G. & E.,Pacific Telephone, and other applicable authorities ep , EU4 All proposed utilities within the project shalt be installed and utilities unless exempt by the Municipal Code. underground including existing EU5 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation and undergrounding of Public utilities,as required, existing 13 EU7 The design of the division of land shall provide each cable o 3432 construct,install and maintain,on land identified on the ma as dedicated d oPPorn'niry to use, any equipment necessary to extend cable television services toetaoch public utffity Parcel in the subdivision. This conditions shall not dweiliug units to condominiums aPPIY to the cOOVersion of existing ,community apartments, or stock cooperatives. EU8 Subject to all applicable Federal and State laws, statutes and regulations, multiple cable communication operators desiring to serve new residential developments in which the electric poWer and telephone utilities are underground, procedure shall apply with respect to access to and utilization of Underground the following . erground eascmmts: (a) The developer shall be responsible for con cable operatom to ascertain which operators and surveying all franchised service to ffie development, The developer desire � provide cable television receive responses from cable o P�may establish a reasonable deadline to cable o Peratorx. The final tract map shall indicate the operator(s)that have agreed to serve the development, (b) if one or more cable operators wish to �o� d in the joint utilities trench on a nondsdscriminat D Y shall be ry shared basis. (c) The developer shall provide at least (10) worms utility trenches will be open to the rators e cable o $ ms's notice of the date that the development, that have agreed to serve the (d) Sharing the joint utilities trench shall be subject to compliance with Public Utilities Commission and utility standards. If such Compliance is not if three (3) or more operators desire to provide service to the development, e developer shall provide a separate trench for the cable television cables the entire cost shared among the Participating es. with the of the deveI � g cable operators. With the 00ncumence open, the affected utilities and the cable television operators, alternative Installation procedures, such as the use of utilized,subject to the applicable law. deeper trenches, may be (e) Any cable operator wishing to serve an area where the trenches have been losed shall be responsible for separate trenching and associated costs; provided that if the cable operator was not provided timel written such trenches,the developer tten notice of the availability of Per shall reimburse the operator for such costs. EMl � EM3 This project is approved specifically as I (single)phase. EM4 This subdivision contains a remainder Parcel. No building permit shall be issued for the remainder parcel until it is reviewed and approved pursuant to the of the Encinitas Municipal Code. This note shall be Placed on the Final Parcel 1 Provisions M of Title 24 Map. 14 6421 C # 2001-02020 APR 04 . 2001 12 : 04 P111 Recording Requested by: ) OFFICIA1 RECORDS City Engineer ) SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE When Recorded Mail To: ) GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER FEES: City Clerk } City of Encinitas ) Encin� - Vulcan Avenue s CA 92024 } '4y ) S PACE; �tsv v ;. 2001- 030 COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY WAIVER OF PROTEST TO ASSESSMENTS Assessor' s Parcel Number: 264-091-59 Project No. 99-207 TPM A• ALVIN F. MAYO AND NANETTE MAYO, TRUSTEES OF THE MAYO FAMILY TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 19, 1990 as, ( "OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property which is commonly known as 99-207 TPM, ("PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows : PARCEL "C-1" IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE ENCINITAS BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT (CASE No. 97-131 BA) CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 1997-0614690 ON DECEMBER 5, 1997 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY;and B. In consideration of 99-207 PM OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: No protest shall be made by the owners to any proceedings for the installation or acquisition of street improvements, including undergrounding of utility lines, under any special assessment 1911 or the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, or any other applicable state or local law, and whether processed by the City of Encinitas or any other governmental entity having jurisdiction in the matter and for the purposes of determining property owners support for same. C. This Covenant shall run with the land upon and inure to the benefit of the fu ,�p, ding successors, heirs, personal represen - — `tau ers, assigns of the respective parties. ' and waiver.doc tco 12/27/00 (01-11-93) AUG 3 2006 1 Y `. 6422 D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Uon Opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the properp y tax notice bill and of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY b way of this Covenant . y E. If either party is required to incurs costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the other party. F. Failure of the OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant . G. Upon OWNER's satisfaction of OWNER's obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and dCITYs shalld execute a "Satisfaction of Covenant" . H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: OWNER Dated •��.�� K 8e AtA DEL Dated /--(� �/ ar (Not zzatzon of OWNER signature is attached) vv G�2.t�C-�, ke, M ; o -ax,;, Jrras o�a�eG� ATTACH NOTARY HERE F b)-x CIT E I TA Dated (Notariz do not required) by A an D. Archibald, Director of Engineering Services waiver.doc tco 12/27/00 (01_11_93) 6423 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of ORANGE ss. On 1/4/01 , before me, NANCY H. Date WARNER, NOTARY PUBLIC _ Name and Titte of Officer "Jane Doe,Notary Public") Personally appeared AL F. MAYO AND NANETTE MAYO Names)of Signer(s) X7 personally known to me 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence NANCY H.WARNER to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are + Commission* 1139307 subscribed to the within instrument and z Notary Public-California Orange Counn � acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed ty My Comm.Expires Jul 6, the same in his/her/their authorized ca 2002 acit ies l p y( ), and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. NESS my hand and official seal. Place Notary seal Above ?� ign lure of Notary Public ) OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law,it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. ) Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: O Individual ❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s): Top of thumb Here ❑ Partner—0 Limited 0 General E Attorney in Fact C7 Trustee O Guardian or Conservator O Other: ;) Signer Is Representing: ®1997 National Notary Association•9350 De Soto Ave.,P.O.Box 2402•Chatsworth,CA 91 3 1 3-2402 � Prod.No.5907 Reorder:C09 To[[-Free 1- 1.800.876.6827 _ San Diego Gas& Electric Company Ill!!!11!!!I!Illlllll111l1111!{11!1111{111111{Illlllllllllllllfiilfllf � When recorded, mail to: 04851 . 20{0_i�-0657158 San Diego Gas& Electric Company "EP 13 , 2001 10 : 55 nM c/o Sempra Energy :_G 8335 Century Park Court, Suite 100 OFFICIAL RECORDS S41 DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE �� San Diego, CA 92123-1569 bREGDRY J. S�ITy, COUNTY RECORDER ,fir Attn: Real Estate Records - CP 11 D FEES- lo.DO ��_ ( : NA Project No.: 037876-010& 020 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE Const. No.: 27 _ A.P.N.: Pe _ u� i is ( Transfer Tax None } S DIEGO GAS 4 ELECTRIC COMPANY L�~UA I ..s EAS ENT ALV1N F. _ _. . MAYO, NANETTE MAYO, TRUSTEES OF MAYO FAMILY TRUST DATED FEBRUARY I9, 1990, hereinafter called "Grantor", grants to SAN DIE ELECTRIC COMPANY, a corporation, hereinafter called "Grantee", an easement an GAS & way to erect, construct, change the size of, improve, reconstruct, relocate, repair, maintain and right of use facilities consisting of: (1) Underground electric facilities and a and transmission and distribution of electricity, 2 appurtenances for the appurtenances, (3) Pipelines and appurtenances( ) Underground communication facilities, and of ingress thereto and egress therefrom ovesaidfeas meanandlover other pwrposes together with the right Grantor's land situated in the County of San Diego, State t California described cal routes across /�► follows: Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4 and the "Remainder Parcel" of Parcel Map No. 1 , 2001 at File No. awl-D1/I1/d in the Office of the CO n fled ounty of San Diego. ty Recorder of said The easement in aforesaid lands shall be more particulahy described as follows: Those portions of said Parcels 1 2 3 4 and the delineated as "EXISTING PRIVATE ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER D shown and RECORDED APRIL 16, 1998 AS DOC# 1998-0187788 O R DOCUMENT "WILDFLOWER.DRIVE"and "POPPY HILLS LANE"on said Parcel Map. monly known as In order to provide adequate working area for Grantee, Grantor shall not erect construct, nor permit to be erected, placed or constructed any b place or any vehicle, plant any trees and/or shrubs within eight feet of the front of the door or park opening of any above ground facilities installed within this easement. hinged uilding or other structure l s:land.-data:lraforms:distrib:D-3short.doc 9197 REV.02101 ( Grantor grants to Grantee the right to erect 04852 adjacent to this easement retaining maintain bon Glamor's property immediately Grantee's purposes. g wa11s and/°r Protective barricades as may be necessary for Grantor will exercise only such reserved rights in said land as will no ' Prohibit the free and complete use and enjoyment by Grantee, its successor t interfere with or rights hereby granted. Grantee shall have the right to assign an or ssor or assigns, of the easement in whole or in Y all rights granted in this part to other companies providing utility or co Grantee shall have the right to top, cut, remove, or trim interferinTy 1 mmunication services. said easement free from and to prevent an g pants and trees, and to keep from erecting, g, Y person, including Grantor and successors and assigns, g, placin or storing on said easement an structures, objects, or earth fills/cuts or other obstructionsyexcep walls acid ther h azards and any fences. The legal description for this easement was prepared by San Die Company pursuant to Section 8730 of the Business and professions Co go Gas & Electric Dated Code, State of California. ` LVIN F.MAYO, NANETTE MAYO, TRUSTEES OF MAYO FAMILY TRUST DATED FEBRkJARY 19, 1990 By � F. TRUSTEE LV 4TJR51 BY= ANETTE MA US E Prepared by: IZeddick Checked by: Date: 4/16/01 s.hand'data.•lrajorms.•dislrib:D-3shordoc 9197 REY.02101 t. 2 V053 STATE OFG COUNTY OF SS, On 5--/2-3 before me /mil oo Y(&Y.T P+-�_) �oT•�!� (name, title of officer), appeared personally known to me proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity ies acknowledged by is/h to me signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of)wh' d that by his/her/their executed the instrument. Which the person(s) acted, WITNESS my hand and official seal. -_=- MF; kQOYtiMJEisitV`�`,, . Commission 0 1183189 Notary Public California Signature x Orange County My Carom.�G'�sMoy:10,xQ2 $:Iand.•data:Iraforms:distrib:D-3short,doc 9197 PEY.02101 3 04854. GOVERNMENT CODE 27361.7 I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE NOTARY SEAL ON THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS STATEMENT I ATTACHED READS AS FOLLOWS: S Name of the Notary: MEL KOOYUMJIAN Commission Number 1183189 Expiration Date: 05/10/02 County Where Bond is Filed: ORANGE COUNTY Manufacturer or Vendor Number: NNA7 (Located on both sides of the notary seal border) Signature: t�SEMPRMA ENERGY irm Name (if appcable) Place of Execution: SAN DIEGO Date: 9/10/01 i 3288 DOC # 2001•—0059 2001-0059000 00 Recording Requested By: City of Encinitas Feb 01 , 2Qp� c� ��, AM f` } RECORDS r% When Recorded Mail To: ) SM MAO RECORDER'S pfFI( City Clerk ) GREG RY J. SMITH, 0M RECORDER ` City of Encinitas ) FEB: IDA dU � 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas,CA 92024 } } { C/&A FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY Y ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE GRANT OF OPEN SPACE/HABITAT PRESERVATION EASEMENT Assessor's Parcel No.: Project Nos.: 99_207 TPM 264-091-59 W.O.No.: 6789-G Alvin F. Mayo&Nanette Mayo, hereinafter called GRANTOR,does hereby grant,convey and dedicate an open space easement to the CITY OF ENCINITAS,State of California,hereinafter called GRANTEE,with terms,covenants and conditions as follows: An easement over, upon, across, and under the lands hereinafter described -on the Legal Description attached hereto and as shown on the Open Space Easement Plat attached hereto, hereinafter referred to as the subject land, to wit: (1) Grantor conveys a perpetual easement for open space over, upon, across and under the subject land consisting of all steep slopes and the Escondido Creek not disturbed by the grading as shown on the approved Tentative Parcel Map 99-207. No building, structure or other thing whatsoever shall be constructed, erected, placed or maintained on the subject land, nor shall grading, landscaping or brush removal be performed, except as is permitted by Tentative Parcel Map 99-207 and the associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) of the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration issued pursuant to the Municipal Code of the City of Encinitas, as said permit was issued by Resolution of the Planning Commission on July 27, 2000, or as said permit may be hereinafter amended or modified pursuant to the Municipal Code of the City of Encinitas. (2) Grantor conveys the perpetual right, but not the obligation to enter upon the subject land and remove any buildings, structures or other things whatsoever constructed, erected, placed or maintained on the subject' contrary to any term, covenant or condition of this easement and to do any work necessary to eliminate the effects of any excavation or grading or placement of sand, soil, rock or gravel or any other material placed on the subject land contrary to any term, covenant or condition of this easement. (3) Grantor covenants and agrees for itself and its successors and assigns as folio (A) That it shall not erect, construct, place or maintai U construction, placement, or maintenance of any boil r structure or other I AONG 3 ?JD06 Cd/m rt1/g:c0v:9920 7tpmosesm(.Co v t ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY Of ENCINITAS 3286 thing whatsoever on the subject land, nor shall grading, landscaping removal be performed, other than such buildings, structures or brush or other things as is permitted by Tentative Parcel Map 99-207 and grading, ssoctated adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration issued pursuant to the Municipal Code of the City of Encinitas, as said permit was issued by Resolution of the Planning Commission on July 27, 2000, or as said permit may be hereinafter amended or modified pursuant to the Municipal Code of the City of Encinitas. All necessary Utility lines may be erected on the subject land upon review and approval of the City of Encinitas in conformance with the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (B) That, except for those portions authorized by Tentative Parcel Map 99-207 for grading and landscaping, it shall not use the subject land for anexcept as open space to permanently maintain the steep slopes and bio ogicaall oresourc s, and no clearing or removal of any vegetation shall,be permitted except brush clearing for fire protection purposes by written order of the Encinitas Fire Protection Department. (C) That it shall not excavate or grade or or, place or allow to be placed an perm- it any excavating ting or grading to be done whatsoever on the subject land without the written perm permission of other the City of Encinitas or its successors or assigns; provided, however, that grantor may excavate, grade or place sand, soil, rock or gravel or other material on the subject land as is permitted by Tentative Parcel Map 99-207, and the associated adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration issued pursuant to the Municipal Code of the City of Encinitas,as said permit was issued by Resolution of the Planning Commission on July 27, 2000, or as said permit may be hereinafter amended or modified pursuant to the Municipal Code of the City of Encinitas. All necessary utility lines may be erected on the subject land upon review and approval of the City of Encinitas in conformance with the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. (D) That the terms, covenants and conditions set forth herein may be specifically enforced or enjoined by proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California. It is agreed that the grant of this easement and its acceptance by the City of Encinitas shall not authorize the public or any members thereof to use or enter upon all or any Portion of land, it being understood that the purpose of this easement is solely to restrict the use teo which the subject land may be put. Pursuant to Special Condition SCD of the Resolution for Approval of the Tentative map, No. 99- 207, the open space easement required by the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting program (MMRP) established by the Environmental Initial Assessment for this project shall be implemented during the planning and construction of the approved project. The follow, mitigation measure was required: Prior to the issuance of a grading g shall cause to be recorded a covenant, acceptable to the Comuniry Development property which establishes an open space easement over all steep slopes and the Escondido Creek not disturbed b the ' Y proposed grading. Previously landscaped slopes within this area shall be maintained in good condition. If the existing or future owner fails to maintain the non-native slope landscaping on the parcels, a future plan may be approved by the City to clear non-native plant materials on the previously landscaped slopes and revegetate the slopes in native sage scrub Cd/mrhlg:cov:99207tQmosesrn t.cov 3281 and compatible non-native drought tolerant species in accordance with the fire code and riparian woodland habitat respectively, by hydroseeding and/or other methods. The existing irrigation system shall be removed upon establishment of revegetated materials. Brushing or other removal of native or revegetated plant materials (except in accordance with the fire code), alteration of landform,grading, trenching for utilities, erection or placement of structures of any kind, vehicle access (except for recreational trail maintenance), or any other disturbance of slope or biological resources within the open space easements shall be prohibited. This easement shall bind the owner and its successors and as gns. Date: N _Grantor- � y 1� Date: Y 2 E, Q Grantor: lL Signature of Grantors shall be notarized. The appropriate acknowledgementsshall be attached. I certify on behalf of the Planning Commission of the City of Encinitas, pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution of said Commission adopted on July 27, 2000, that the City of Encinitas consents to the making of the foregoing Grant of Open Space/Slope Preservation Easement and consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date: p By: Alan D.Archibald Directorof Engineering Services City of Encinitas Cd/mrh/g:cov:992071pmo5e$mt.cav 3 3288 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT I� State of California County of ORANGE On 1/26/01 , before me, NANCY H. r Date WARAER, NOTARY PUBLIC Name and T19001 Officer(e.g„•,te"Doe, Personally appeared ALVIN F. MAYO AND NANETTE MAYO, TRUSTEES ' Name(s>a s'g^crtal , fpersonaily known to me n proved to me on the basis of satisfactory 1 evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are NANCY N.WARNER subscribed to the within instrument and Camrnwion#1]89307 acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed Notary Publtc-Caiffornto the same in , CrOnge County ca acit les , and hi that authorized t MYCornm-�Kes.tuf6.2= p Y( ) Y his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s),or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. _ 1TNESS my hand and official seal. i P1aco Notary seal Above aaturo d Noaary Puyrc Thou a OPTIONAL yhnomow fs not required by law,it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could pro vent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document t Title or Type of Document: Document Date: "'– Number of Pages: t Signer(s)Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies)Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: O individual ' D Corporate Officer—Title(s): _ roo of thumb hem ' u Partner—C Limited D General O Attorney in Fact , ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: t O 1997 National Notary Also tiaeon•; Do Soto Ave,P.O.Box 2402•Chate-ortb,CA 91313.2e02 - 1 Prod.No.5907 Reorder:Can 701-Fre6 f•80P876.6827 r • ; 8 9 SDE 4431 November 13, 2000 FILE: ...4431survl IegalsIOPEN SPACE EASEMENT.doc REV LAND . Jtti�p�N L LEGAL DESCRIPTION OPEN SPACE EASEMENTS E 0 TPM APN 264-091-59 CJIUf THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCEL "C" OF CITY OF ENCINITAS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF .DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 5, 1997 AS DOC# 1997-0614690, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8,TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST,SAN BERNAR SAN MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: DINO OPEN EASEMENT 1: 1EGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL i• THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 1-40 '36"EAST,4.19A THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER THEREOF; 3 FEET TO 2. THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 89°55'44"WEST,317.11 FEET; 3. THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 16 049-42"EAST, 104.42 FEET; 4. THENCE SOUTH 42 026'05"EAST,85.58 FEET; 5- THENCE SOUTH 56 052'52"EAST,89.69 FEET, 6• THENCE SOUTH 28°59'42"EAST, 35.24 FEET; 7. 'THENCE SOUTH 00 027'49"WEST,21.05 FEET; 8. THENCE SOUTH 16 037'33"WEST,44.18 FEET; 9• THENCE SOUTH 39 020'41"WEST,67.39 FEET; 10, THENCE SOUTH 47 013'29" WEST, 55,80 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL"C"; 11. THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 84°05109" EAST, 222.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, OPEN EASEMENT 2: BEGJNNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "C"; 12. THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE THEREOF SOUTH 84°05'09"EAST,810.63 FEET; 13. THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 29°27'31"WEST,85.84 FEET; 14. THENCE NORTH 39°35'50"WEST, 56.83 FEET; 15. THENCE NORTH 46°09'15-WEST, 93,76 FEET; 16, THENCE NORTH 59 006'04 WEST, 20.72 FEET, 17. THENCE NORTH 77°30.36"WEST, 36.93 FEET; 18. THENCE NORTH 21°38'56"WEST,31.69 FEET; 19. THENCE SOUTH 72 002'35"WEST,38.27 FEET; 1 OF 2 3290 SDE 4431 November 13,2000 FILE; .,.4431sum lega1skOPEN SPACE EASEMENT.doc 20. THENCE SOUTH 44039'01"WEST, 51.86 FEET; 21. THENCE NORTH 76°19'40"WEST,21.25 FEET; 22. THENCE SOUTH 64 040'21"WEST,70.12 FEET; 23, THENCE NORTH 83°2822"WEST, 76.43 FEET; 24, THENCE SOUTH 437'08"WEST, 18,17 FEET; 25. THENCE NORTH 85-0341 WEST,354.84 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL .0 26. THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 4°09'24" WEST, 95.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2OF2 .. ...... _---........ Lo f D .• __. m�-oM0 o -inM; f, w ;a 3291 f f 0 rr) J i s r m oQ� c o m o w p f b n�� C 0:9 rq i {z s�s+p� $� C '`pm�C30 tn�0zZ r77 GO �� + z m Ta too Corn OD y 1 O L+ co z tor)o rr? f —{ m t0 —4 r j r7 M E r a IN z 4 W N 77._ o _._......_._.............. RESOLUTION NO. PC 2000-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ENCINITAS PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO CREATE FOUR PARCELS AND A REMAINDER PARCEL FOR VACANT PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF WILDFLOWER ROAD WITHIN THE HILLSIDE/INLAND BLUFF OVERLAY ZONE AND THE CULTURAL/NATURAL CAI' (Case No. 99-207 TPM; Ap 264-091- 59OVE�'AY ZONE WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Tentative Parcel Map was filed b Mayo Family Trust / San Dieguito Engineering to allow for the subdivision of a Y the Property into four parcels and a Remainder Parcel in accordance with Section 30.34.030 Inland acr Bluff Overlay) and Chapter 24 (Subdivisions) of the Encinitas Municipal Code f ( d located within the Hillside / Inland Bluff Overlay Zone, the Cultural/Natural Reso urce Overlay Zone, and the Rural Residential (RR) Zoning District of the Olivenhain or property City of Encinitas, legally described as: Community Area of the (SEE ATTACHMENT"A") WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing o application on July 27, 2000; at which time all those desiring to be heard were heard; an n the and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered, without limitation: 1 The July 27, 2000 agenda report to the Planning Commission with exhibits; z 2• The General Plan, Municipal Code, and associated Land Use Maps; 3• Oral evidence submitted at the hearing; 4. Written evidence submitted at the hearing; 5. Proposed Tentative Parcel Map consisting of one (1)page, dated received b City of Encinitas on June 14, 2000; and Y the WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings pursuant to C 24 (Subdivisions) of the Encinitas Municipal Code: hapter (SEE ATTACHMENT`B") NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of th of Encinitas hereby approves application 99-207 TPM subject to the followin conditions: e City g bons: (SEE ATTACHMENT"C") BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning o j ission, in its udgment, finds that this project will not have a significant adverse Comm on the environment ronrnent and 1 ATTACHMENT 66A" Resolution No. PC 2000-43 Case No. 99-207 TPM LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIp13 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE OF WILDFLOWER DRIVE CENTERLINE IS SHOWN ON CITY OF ENCINITS TRACT NO. 88-183 ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 12882, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 23, 1991, 350.OQ FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERL ,POINT �jIAL THE OF A SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 78 026'42" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID CURVE 38.56 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6°18'44"; THENCE SOUTH 17 052'02" WEST, 16.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 007'58" EAST, 144.98 FEETTO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400.00 FOOT RADIU CONCAVE NORTHERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 53.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°36'54"• THENCE RADIALLY TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 10 015'09" WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 038'28" WEST 178.72 FEET• THENCE SOUTH 33°16'30" EAST, 260.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 034'36" WEST 263.59 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 3 ' FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 032'31" WEST, 403.33 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE SOUTHERLY 624.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE) OF THE WESTERLY 838.00 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREO SOUTH 4 009'24" WEST, 624.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER THEREOF;F THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER SOUTH 84 005'09" EAST, 1362.53 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE H 767.55 FEET (MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE) OF THE EASTERL SOUTHERLY 0.00 FEET(MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE) OF SAID SOUTHEAST UARTE ; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 1040'36" EAST,T 419. FEET; THENCE LEAVING LAST SAID LINE NORTH 89 055'44" WEST 420.3 03 2 FEET, THENCE NORTH 50°19'11" WEST, 206.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78°39'37" WEST 155.67 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 058'38" WEST, 273.23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF F 3