Loading...
2004-9113 G -y city NGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Encinitas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering August 10, 2006 Attn: CBIC Insurance 111 Pacifica Suite 350 Irvine, California 92618 RE: Ken and Gay Spencer Crest Drive APN 265-260-36 Grading Permit 9113-G Final release of security Permit 9113-G authorized earthwork, storm drainage, single driveway, and erosion control, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the grading and finaled the project. Therefore, a full release in the remaining security deposit is merited. Performance Bond CE2773, in the original amount of$23,971.25, (reduced by 75% to $5,992.81) is hereby released in entirety. The document original is enclosed. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerel , Debra Geishart J Le bach Engineering Technician inane Manager Subdivision Engineering Financial Services CC Jay Lembach,Finance Manager Ken and Gay Spencer Debra Geishart File Enc. TEL 760-633-2600 / FAX 760-633-2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024-3633 TDD 760-633-2700 recycled paper D3-zz9 ENGINEERING SER VICES DEPARTMENT City 01 Encinitas Capital Improvement Projects District Support Services Field Operations Sand Replenishment/Stormwater Compliance Subdivision Engineering Traffic Engineering March 16, 2005 Attn: CBIC Insurance 111 Pacifica Suite 350 Irvine, California 92618 RE: Ken and Gay Spencer Crest Drive APN 265-260-36 Grading Permit 9113-G Partial release of security Permit 9113-G authorized earthwork, storm drainage, single driveway, and erosion control, all needed to build the described project. The Field Operations Division has approved the rough grading. Therefore, a reduction in the security deposit is merited. Performance Bond CE2773, in the amount of$23,971.25, may be reduced by 75% to $5,992.81. The document original will be kept until such time it is fully exonerated. The retention and a separate assignment guarantee completion of finish grading. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Debra Geishart at (760) 633- 2779 or in writing, attention this Department. Sincerely, Debra Geishart .lay Lem ch Engineering Technician finance Manager Subdivision Engineering Financial Services CC Jay Lembach,Finance Manager Ken and Gay Spencer Debra Geishart File -yin &* ,�� Grading Permit Hydrology, Hydraulic Calculations City of Encinitas - z Prepared By: San Dieguito Engineering, Inc. 4407 Manchester Ave., Suite 105 Encinitas, CA 92024 Date of Preparation August 4, 2004 HYDROLOGY STUDY 100 YEAR STORM POST-CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NAME: Spencer PROJECT NUMBER: 4925 DATE: 8/4/2004 COMMENT: COORD: N 33 005' E 117°16' P6 (in): 2.60 P6/P24: 0.58 P24 (in): 4.50 ADJUSTED P6: 2.60 Soil Group C,D BASIN A 100 11859 0.3 C 0.56 5.0 6.85 1.0 43% IMPER BASIN B 100 4664 0.1 C 0.43 5.0 6.85 0.3 21% IMPER BASIN B1 100 2706 0.1 C 0.87 5.0 6.85 0.4 100% IMPER BASIN C 100 3227 0.1 C 0.51 5.0 6.85 0.3 35% IMPER BASIN D 100 2610 0.1 C 0.70 5.0 6.85 0.3 75% IMPER TOTAL Q: 2.3 cfs ''1* Coefficient based upon percent impervious and class"C" soil. See Table 3-1 Runoff Coefficients for Urban Areas (attached) N LU w Cl) C) _ V) Gj U Li muo lsado U C'3 j ' { `LL_ w Z ch uj tj T _ I CL W 0(Y r LL ....: .,... _ o w cn ZI 1 m x � 0 CL o LLJ LO Ln y , *1 _ F� • w i '�•'0 n `� N i O � w tau CD W ZZZZ �HW Z Z _ nZZ IIWLL �' W Z vwd 5 w - z w ox ox a e �o o 0 0 0 o (D a a CD �- C7w 0 R R 9 fl A A n w 0 n n 0 ti za. a o co 8 d 0 u u ti y � o' �o co w' w'. w" w w' �, y. A co o' C) n W a S S `� '� y y y a o 0 a a" - y a a a a. oa. 0 a a � WO 'r 00 O 0 y 0 y y y y .. O a Z .. .. .. w A y �� r� i1 /1 y o o 7 d d 7y to co • ° CR r PO O r O a Z 7u �O C < co a',:.''i O �• rail -V 0 a tail tail 0 to tail � A - A 0 A A m ::r w A A A A A A A A A ►t " A A y y y O a to 't3 • �.o m. °a 0, 0 0 0 tpo d d d d d o Q 2.a p G C C C C C m a a a a a a a a a 4 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (� El 5 CD (~j y fA [A VJ H %a fA . fA N W fyA CD 0 0 td H a Oi 0 .y M t0 t0 t0 00 w 00 O\ U A. A W U O O tA O O tA O tA O O M O p i .fit jj tri A `J M - Cb N y yi .:O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O `lj�.•V/i/ rn 00 00 00 00 J J O1 U U 1A 4. W W N IJ a O O% 00 r 00 A J O A 0 n A �• O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N w O 00 oD w 00 J +1 O\ In l.A U J� � W W N W J A A O J J �1 00 Ja t-ft — 00 N N to N O O b f/! C"D n A 0 CD C, o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �+ 2 00 00 00 00 --1 •u o o. N in in 1� A is () .w., 0' -1 4�- A .-+ 00 00 t0 O J 3�. 00 Lh N a' . O O� C A n 'ri A OQ p' O M O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O Nw 00 00 00 00 J J �1 01 O\ t1� ll� A .A.. .A W CJ- O� ty �.1 t!� ll� N t0 t0 r-+ w. O aN r••• t h m 0 O CD P M .. q a1 q a 1 t •� f1 � �s �'e�•� "�•�� [sue■ I IN Ten $11 man �q�• ��9 � ■t39■� 1■■�C' a ■.i ii■■■q �tl ;Oc 'ta emu. ,nFs�" ��. . '°� �►� � � .� ,"� �ji �" :_�■ �ggta,►:� ��� a �■s>a�l e•�� �: � �tJ�sq �i.��, .Jilt:�vtiiL���ar�i. ,�_+���—.��unF�i�ot�t�'f���ar�a■ ��s��a°iai■�a igilil� y'pS r: rte �>�'�fs>l+i4i�z►�ss'"■1 t■��■�t�.�us■■i �i■■� ■■■... a ` 011i ■M�lw�li .ME►ilfii .■■.a■f ■■q= ■ IN ME �ta� 5= E° 31�! 111(■ f �s■■■■i��`igitLti'��i■ ■■i ME 41�`+�'ii�_ G��';F?!ti—..�q� .mot. � ■qi H ■i=■■■i■!' ggqi `a'°�ai�■+�D�i.,. i !!Ji qi ■ fL=ii.■■ q■ ME 9RWrAAMM IN �i■� ���f �� MUSEUM 3i�iias s ■ltlt�mA iii■■=iet#■ j io■n '�l�q■a■l4i .■■■ ■ qqq. iti.i�l�•�l' a q�q q��'E►i�i ■■ �a■ ggglY■1 q■. n �i$ a 0 a SERVE pswom MUSEUM Q gi1 • MUSINEWIN Mumma ii @w Slm■om FJ ELOA . .q..ira l36 ■.■ i.■■■�■i■mm as BA NIKKO I MOWN* WIN Ci■�.■■u ■ 'sE e■■■■■.q■ ME ■i■■gi■■11■ lgzli ,, .■ � q i' ■ ■ . .i ■■ :sq rest■ ..■i ■�. ii.■!!`910 �i—� NO Vii i■�tTi�■q mums RWA G�a■■■�t J� ■ 9ia�,�il�/ C� ■ ■i i.■■s■■iii■ f���� -�5iiiq T ■ \ mwm�m EWE IN i. } + ■ Room [Oman CC 's s- u� Men MEMO VIEW—, � ■_In __T CCE �it' IF '�?u �� ' il� l.dr.it► itEiil.}Ysi.w�■..E■Uif'��tEb.�ZIq►�7 Z't'om E\t�Zta(�i.��i���`�y`a\7�A�C 1i3/s�at h �4rfHZ!�i1i-a.1�o�_lL�rfr1f'„'j/'a`i�w t� -ia/ l■l.�Qg�3►E�ElP7JiilEf7iWif.3 E L/��!a■E !E ■E.■REM BUD { . c I.. mum i ; .l ■ Main 011W VAr g i m Q Q i ” ISO tins .■■ . /!A ,;iz ra s■ ...E.p1it!■.1 WAWA !.■E.■■. !!.l...�C•� d aa. is 7�Y�! r IgE■i ■.i..EE.tii qHi st"-E ..E..! C.!■E.�`I�I�L_..ei�i r3:.. _'E!i stS EI !■..EE�3�[L i�E'. !/E � E■ tE■� r--rs.■ ,+i�C l� [3E.■!tl �l� �Iii y� � tt at�■/1 i#■■E C■■■g■EE•.EEE■i E.. i won n� atfingq : 'l E .E■E gE■C� ; an tla7s.■i■■ ti ■■E q■■ i* t �■.■.■!■iEC.ClCi��!■C...I.f fet ■ M ri sl�j��pi■� �, ■■s,wEEE■.EE t;i.lt t1■t}E<riEa�Eu tiEt 9(s 14i�1f.(1i!1trt1L3E ■.Ei !■.■ xE■EE. -iE ! mum Q" ' E.gES S KE i E■ ■u LIL ..EEEE,E�{C 1►t4! /itdLfr[ilEL�1!■tiE ■/!sr sstl.QSld ■ . t■■EE■Elirtai# E'■CCi-UCKME!■twta■■H■P■ti i1�EE.�t��ii�i�EiilLti2ES��■�■ 'a yEEE■E■ E■■■Y u1+ir�E:a �■I' g�E�41�1i■■■■!. C�E r ■■E�i/!■ IEpI.EEEEE ■■it.�.■E�ief f,�,■���.�iyra Emmat#fQiiiC t■iC�~E�° �i '/�`■li 1�E.ECCCCC�iEEC ■!i� I mum, ��E■-- SO a EMS R�gs�filEEEE■EEICC ■��y����. /tat6EliEEEla .i ■ £� q.5il lgEEEEE !■■tsiit�+ ■ �E !!g ■e�ifEglf3f���l�i/■EEf67ED[EEE■.. ! E■tut f ilI;E� v ' owl am am E[#EH�[EEgEE IME MEONES II=��71/E 5w iQf.flE9■i11�37■E■Ela+t■E■ E •' ;RC I■ rRIMMEW, Ron lal> '.!1■EEi/.q.q wi ft.q .��+dEE..Sil4I7tili.ltL'is . iq■■QiEEifEi[ta..":"�i SEEM SUNNI "'t! ilE.i■■EI#C�/yY■■■■E■E. EEE■■E.tl■EE>•EEU. Soon min ■.E■MEMO NONE17LEE3Q Ei�ft3/1!�"■ ��� � ■■EE..EalE.1t■EE■ ■E.lE■EEII■ '�t.E iiiiii������ �����!!!!!!■■■E■■■ llssEE�E.■ E#■ES■E�■.■"MEa(EC�'E■■� sgRsa tgEEp.3E■��■!� � �i� ���.y CIEE.IEEERR■ "�.tt#sai4iE3■ E;■CCCC■iE �,� ' ■ ■EE.■!E. ■ _.,1�11rE16E ■E■■Esf. �■(tijf t.lp.■t[t■!■■E.l[CHCCE■E■. .EgREE.�Ei�tY i�i��' E ` '■EC� ■ECC �!■E r .�'■"ON C3'EICCE'E.C.■.qEE■ �C;■■E■ qEi�/` ,E�.�CC'ECiEL;■■q �lSa[E.EE.E E�.. ;s�.....tma `E�■W�E.�t[111 E■�9IE1�ytigE. �crsrieE R.a4 . ill..sE.. ■E■EEE[!Er IEJ■ mmm lEEE�E■■■EEi 9■.sgHEEaE■A�I�L■di■En■ ■sE!■■0 ZME �I ■■)SEE■■ H-Ems.■si CE■EEEIE aslyi➢i■Qlti■■■E■EE■E■ ■!ss■EEEE■ SIMMONS■■■u .AE■■■■■.E Ean ■ /Er/ EE ■E■ESE■EECi ■ 'q i • • • • I c.S.''v.- • - nw>i1u1m����H/�r!;�rl�nnr�1■r ■�I!/ii�11111�1111111�rr�;��� Jug .�� �� �. /!gyp/l1111i1n111o11♦ ��� r �r•�IJ%� dlnn111n1n111N����//���J�w_,j��w/r/ �tr��atit��unntmutt�■�r /��� , Ji11J ttu�ittn���uw��tt� ���n t•�tt��s',�■t��tiit'����,//� �utrtun��t��nui�tn�r-���� .iii""�r� � iri��► - iw..�nrs�:'�■saa,■■u,u�i ia�ranar��ui■ ���'� �r ��s a�,■� uanrarrnr ��■■!��■rl���r �!'I r �I■■r r�iri�[r=i[frsri�ar,rrra[u��r��r�[I>•�� �� � I II w���uu ■rt,,,rr[Ir rrrrrr� ��ai.r�rru�r�■�[■'�r�[� ■I.r , ����rrrr� ssrasiiwii��wrwr.wr.ww.•�r`t�tt�� �� �Ia —j! 1►!■�r�i .uwwwww..■ uw�w�� itt! �`�/S� it r�ria°°��iii�awiwwwwuw��wwww�w.w —��I �jiffs m� ■u�u.wn■ •�w��w� •'•r�l. .'..�wr�ruiiii�oiwwwwwuwwr—��w���uw�. wwwwr.����•�s—r� rf1111�i +WAMN, .�.wrr•�ryir.W�i��� �i'�i� r�.f/�wr°=r r►Iw/./mow COMO�w�a�•aRr=�va_.i�. p �—��—M rla M —�r i iiwiiiui.w� '� wua�•w�ii��v.......... M i►�r• __= a ��..M • w�s���_iw�_ �����.�::�r•w.�.w�w�w �'wR�_�rw�r r'wn'•wr„rir r.•r►Rr�vsr.rur u'�w�ws�ww•w_ !'����C��C��C°per°�._�_��•.�_� .iwrs `��•��i e.i w'.�'��w�R�� _� �rtrnei�r�nttt�mt �ai?iv�t�w•t . .. iiro • �1�witi���lllll�lu��.��'''rtrr�nri ��•�,�./'►.�t�� � Ensa<n an���nuu■ar�����aa ,ins—r�lrl .I�_�� �Unnr s�a��rinaua°n�a�►�a�' /!!ss'A.irUa�� .. auaurfu��rrau�►ars���l�iasi iim WAN m � �rrrrrrrear��r■rrr[rrrir����rrrlrrI FA �ars��ur��rr„rlarr,■�� —r ,m,,f »s ■�art,rsasf�■al■r,, ■rrrr�� �sAWArA �_i__ • a ��r.�nn��....rrrrwan■ glow soon — - aa�iwvc �r rwAi s_a.rnmm iiiisw.[awau[wwwunow ���rAN AW�� aw mm ow �•�a.R.•R�� u/ wu�r�.'a�� iiiiiii`v'i���r"���r.w RR r•�S�'w'•�rR.. Ran•w_��w _ rsrw��w��•.��ww�"� M FPSMO s • • �F _ M � ��; �� , Ai- u n A � a � m �,,• � � � C # " awl rea ✓ = $ ., .tt 'Or K i tx 4$ 't .l'� 4� p+� � ads"�,�aF"' � .�'1Y��'-�,^`� ��•P' ''ate.`� `�r'� ;..�Y, .'.�.. 8 x � �i , q a4� vl a ^ rt 4 s .' r �.`�". ',�S t •z3`s " ., vi, � ��,' �, o+^ k u-. ce •..�, 9ae�'P'° b �" s4 _ �q�H°'a in `v ���3� "�� �'�,. '[, i 2 ,� "%', «.�. �;....�, t�' Wg z�^ r=` s,i r;✓ �� �'+ ''s s A� i'is�',�sS .�— � °��- ��Z t�„a �� -?,�• za� � ",'�„ �� „�. -a,"�i R4'. Im ,,.. nh aLd $ vtY'4_', Ak }i � fay,.” � _•^ � ^r° .��" £ r � ( �n �' � � $� ' � r"� .;:� vS- rK"' 7r'f'k via �r„a v =er�• � <> t, 4; J- zv�e 4 a..'et •`*` , a r ,.. E t .. gym»Y •�• _zv '� <- Al TABLE- 15 (114) IINTERPRETATIONS FOR LAND MANAGEMENT KEY TO INTERPRETATION RATING SYMBOLS: ! HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUPS: LIMITATIONS: A HIGH INFILTRATION RATE SL SLIGHT DEGREE OF LIMITATION B MODERATE INFILTRATION RATE M MODERATE DEGREE OF LIMITATION C SLOW INFILTRATION RATE SE SEVERE DEGREE OF LIMITATION D VER Y SLOW INFIL TRA TION RA TE ! Interpretation Rating/' Interpretation Ratings' s cH I Soil Map o 2 ` H Soil Map o Symbol' 3 Erodibility by Water c�� Symbol' o Erodibility by Water L- ° o 0 o a o 0 o x cv c) (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4) AcG D SE (SIP) SE BsC D M (str) SL d AtC D SL SL d BsD D M (str) SL d AtD D SL SL d BsE D M (SIP) SL d AtD2 D SL SL d BtC D M (Str) SL f AtE D M (SIP) SL d BuB C SE (str) SL 9 AtE2 D M (SIP) SL d BuC C SE (str) SL 9 AtF D --S-E(SIP) M d BuD2 C SE (str) SL 9 Wu A SE (str) SL a 6 uE2 C SE (str) SL 9 AuF A SE (str) M AvC C SE (str) SL CaB B M (txt) SL 9 AwC D SL SL CaC B M (txt) SL g AwD D SL SL CaC2 B M (txt) SL 9 AyE D M (SIP) SL CaD2 B M (txt) SL 9 � I CbB C SE (txt) SL BaG D SE (sip) SE CbC G SE (txt) SL BbE C SE (str) M C SE (txt) SL BbE2 C SE (str) M CbE C SE (txt) SL BbG C SE (SIP) M CCC D BbG2 C SE (sip) M CcE D BeE D SE (str) SL CeC A SE (txt) BgE D SE (str) M CfB D SE (dpt) SL BgF D SE (sip) M CfC D SE (dpt) SL BIC D SE (dpt) SL CfD2 D SE (dpt) M f; BIC2 D SE (dpt) SL CgC BID2 D SE (dpt) SL (Cf) D BmC D M (txt) SL (Ur) D BnB ChA C SE (str) SL (BI) D SE (dpt) SL ChB C SE (str) SL j (Fa) C SE (dpt) SL CkA C M (txt) M BoC C M (txt) SL CID2 B SE (str) SE BoE C M (SIP) SL CIE2 B SE (str) SE I BrE C M (SIP) SL CIG2 B SE (s1p) SE BrG C SE (SIP) M CmE2 B SE (str) SE I a. For full soil name see Appendix F,Guide to Mapping Units. nent.soil units are not shown separately on the soil maps, it is b. Parenthetical symbols indicate properties adversely affecting recommended that the overall ratings for this complex be suitability as follows: assumed to be the same as those for the component soil with (dpt) = Depth to hard rock,or a hardpan,or any layer that the greatest degree of limitation. restricts permeability, d. Typically a grassland soil; conversion from brush usually not (fld) = Flooding,ponding,or overflow necessary, (slp) = Slope e. Moderate on slopes of more than 30 percent,• slight on slopes (str) = Strength of granular, crumb, or blocky structure of less than 30 percent. in the surface layer. f. Stoniness or rockiness not a serious impediment to use of grass planting equipment. Absence of rating means no valid interpretation can be made. g. On desert facing mountain slopes and valleys in Land Resource I' C. This is a soil complex comprised of two soil units in a complex Area 20 E, the degree of limitation is severe because of climate, Pattern. See Appendix F, Guide to Mapping Units, for compo- regardless of soil properties. f , 5 93 f � 5 PIPE B PIPE 131 Given Input Data: Given Input Data: Shape ........................... Circular Shape ........................... Circular Solving for..................... Depth of Flow Solving for..................... Depth of Flow Diameter........................ 6.0000 in Diameter........................ 6.0000 in Flowrate ........................ 0.3000 cfs Flowrate ........................ 0.4000 cfs Slope ........................... 0.0100 ft/ft Slope ........................... 0.0100 ft/ft Manning's n ..................... 0.0110 Manning's n ..................... 0.0110 Computed Results: Computed Results: Depth ........................... 2.8303 in Depth ........................... 3.3608 in Area ............................ 0.1963 ft2 Area ............................ 0.1963 ft2 Wetted Area ..................... 0.0911 ft2 Wetted Area ..................... 0.1132 ft2 Wetted Perimeter................ 9.0852 in Wetted Perimeter................ 10.1482 in Perimeter....................... 18.8496 in Perimeter....................... 18.8496 in Velocity........................ 3.2928 fps Velocity ........................ 3.5344 fps Hydraulic Radius ................ 1.4441 in Hydraulic Radius ................ 1.6059 in Percent Full 47.1720% Percent Full 56.0139% ................... .................... Full flow Flowrate .............. 0.6631 cfs Full flow Flowrate .............. 0.6631 cfs Full flow velocity.............. 3.3773 fps Full flow velocity .............. 3.3773 fps Critical Information Critical Information Critical depth .................. 3.3278 in Critical depth .................. 3.8952 in Critical slope .................. 0.0058 ft/ft Critical slope .................. 0.0063 ft/ft Critical velocity ............... 2.6826 fps Critical velocity ............... 2.9526 fps Critical area ................... 0.1118 ft2 Critical area ................... 0.1355 ft2 Critical perimeter.............. 10.0804 in Critical perimeter.............. 11.2152 in Critical hydraulic radius ....... 1.5976 in Critical hydraulic radius ....... 1.7395 in Critical top width .............. 6.0000 in Critical top width .............. 6.0000 in Specific energy ................. 0.4044 ft Specific energy ................. 0.4742 ft Minimum energy .................. 0.4160 ft Minimum energy .................. 0.4869 ft Froude number................... 1.3588 Froude number................... 1.3101 Flow condition .................. Supercritical Flow condition .................. Supercritical PIPE B+B1 Given Input Data: Shape ........................... Circular Solving for..................... Depth of Flow Diameter........................ 6.0000 in Flowrate ........................ 0.7000 cfs Slope ........................... 0.0200 ft/ft Manning's n ..................... 0.0110 Computed Results: Depth ........................... 3.8640 in Area ............................ 0.1963 ft2 Wetted Area ..................... 0.1337 ft2 Wetted Perimeter................ 11.1777 in Perimeter....................... 18.8496 in Velocity ........................ 5.2367 fps Hydraulic Radius ................ 1.7221 in Percent Full .................... 64.4008% Full flow Flowrate .............. 0.9378 cfs Full flow velocity .............. 4.7762 fps Critical Information Critical depth .................. 5.3655 in Critical slope .................. 0.0076 ft/ft Critical velocity ............... 3.5580 fps Critical area ................... 0.1967 ft2 Critical perimeter.............. 14.1558 in Critical hydraulic radius ....... 2.0013 in Critical top width .............. 6.0000 in Specific energy ................. 0.7485 ft Minimum energy .................. 0.6707 ft Froude number................... 1.7917 Flow condition .................. Supercritical HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY • HYDROGEOLOGY August 26, 2004 Project No. 4809.1 Log No. 8590 Mr. Ken Spencer 1050 Crest Drive Encinitas, California 92024 Subject: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Single-Family Residence/Lot_S -lit . L20O4 1050 Crest Drive Encinitas, California 92024 APN 259-260-36 NOV 2 La References: Attached Dear Mr. Spencer: In accordance with your request, we have performed a geotechnical investigation of the subject site. Our work was performed in July and August 2004. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate geologic and soil conditions within the area intended for new construction, and to provide grading and foundation recommendations for a proposed single-family residence. With the above in mind, our scope of work included the following: • Research and review of available plans and geologic literature pertinent to the site vicinity(see References). • Subsurface exploration consisting of three hand-excavated exploratory test pits for soil sampling and geologic observation. • Laboratory testing of samples obtained from the subsurface exploration. • Engineering and geologic analysis. • Preparation of this report providing the results of our field and laboratory work, analyses, and our conclusions and recommendations. 5205 Avenida Encinas, Suite A • Carlsbad, CA 92008-4369 • (760) 931-1917 • Fax (760) 931-0545 32242 Paseo Adelanto, Suite C • San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-3610 • (949) 487-9060 • Fax (949) 487-9116 www.hetheringtonengineering.com GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4809.1 Log No. 8590 August 26, 2004 Page 2 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property is located at 1050 Crest Drive, Encinitas, California, (see Location Map, Figure 1). The site consists of a level, rectangular-shaped lot that presently supports a single-family residence and detached garage. It is our understanding that the existing lot will be split into two equal sized lots, and that the proposed northerly lot generated by the lot split will receive the proposed new construction. The site is bounded on the east by Crest Drive, and on the north, west and south by similarly developed residential properties. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT We understand that proposed development consists of a two-story, wood-frame, single- family residence with attached and detached two-car garages supported by conventional continuous/spread footings with slab-on-grade floors. Building loads are expected to be typical for this type of relatively light construction. We anticipate that the structures will be constructed at approximate existing site grades; consequently, grading is expected to be minor. Access to the garages is expected to be by way of paved driveways. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Subsurface conditions were explored by manually excavating three test pits to depths of approximately 3.5 to 4-feet below existing site grades. The approximate locations of the test pits are shown on the attached Plot Plan, Figure 2. The subsurface exploration was supervised by a geologist from this office, who visually classified the soil materials, obtained bulk samples for laboratory testing and performed in-place density tests in accordance with ASTM: D 2937 (Drive-Cylinder Method). The soils were visually classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Soil classifications are shown on the attached Logs of Test Pits, Figures 3 and 4. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory testing was performed on samples obtained during the subsurface exploration. Tests performed consisted of the following: • Moisture Content (ASTM: D 2216) • Sulfate Content (EPA 9038) HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. p p h,lM ,E.R84 y A a f���t71^ + ,A - � 1` iu Alt, Uy' �- ..{ �4j apC y -EARl.4tONA <R/ �TAFd MiW �R� r �O � 1 lLr is a t t # rj� ,..,:. ,< •C alt zy :x'�,hP4 t•,n, , m LtUCAOIA Z :� Rd' GfyrF fir eu A .Y7t LOWPAVEN cµ,_ OW *0 n f'i•S` OI PS Cl fy Av Fh tUn v ��'� 4 k?R! P� Y t yk, ¢ 'rr d iaMEtGkIM .."� A Sr tY �Y �At ERV1 Y Pv5-ow5 �fi`6 rAm�' .xiW" 4 ±+.? MANpF'R ES x .ant �rxsb t i wiTERCUP RD JN�Tp a+d iris qx �i a, twwrl c t n r .�oa VTS Rc 'QO P ` Z `y 'Yi[ry SxMy l a . f r4tllS c .n '., uT s y.f:EN ARaoa ..y R aiff r:.v uurwc <k W M GARON " A R }'Y . krwa VANESSA * § ca ut R S 3 I y CR 4+ O,P am wev..n r 1. YALLEDA is pp a. rtw 5�ke " Ilk, vn t ti .t w'Y{ubL +.wl k,u Z $ � `t'i F. > 3y,c4e .wwiM G R, yN �� ;Atr�,JT` c`° cr.F 41lEiK EsR It�rk A a E ff a, uR[A vu r.; Y 1 iY S M ttn a Yft' ♦p .Mgb�" GALE RU_ A ru;r(1NI"�,ns uclYnlMtAlA as u,,.. .NCO r S ,, ,A'. }. pA uE % 25� 1 +'t1ASN1 P G ,A .a49 .+rwU+ 'A 6 Q 9 il^' -W F36i if 'v a. •+ .Y L>� meY4v. w rr 5d+ a >< }. >_`;�1* MOIi NA S1R,Ajft � �av:� s p 4L,� �'n ph 2 -•.. 4 "y vSatrRy f Rp v 9Y$1�y 5c b VA $tElllYfiO "+:•. y��ffRM441 M7FGMV7 11tr VdL7.AFiC <SWYtIb � ���:�;, �}?.�,� ,: `" t� MIRO.�. {.. ^*• ,ly, o. v-' GALE t'3` zlK o'L` vtEM tat ENCINITAS FuzA BLVD r � �c rn a urcRa rr f«, ., i� r , oA .. � �p``iErr FAC' E 'tl PARK OR o "'S55ccc tNt -A k ii'�y5 �aEST 1f lk G4,aM 4YtAtK6: �JR HS>VIEW OR z i.a wr ua ,n-Y ewna V f 4 2fS +' r V ISI ltl •1RICN ,4.., g...,xr<.w ' �,•�n w,�.,..M 4�`` � �.`^ � .r*,*.a, _ �. ..... ADAPTED FROM: The Thomas Guide,San Diego County,2004 Edition N SCALE: V-2000' (1 Grid=0.5 x 0.5 miles) LOCATION MAP 1050 Crest Drive HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Encinitas, California GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 4809.1 I FIGURE NO. 1 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4809.1 Log No. 8590 August 26, 2004 Page 3 • Direct Shear(ASTM: D 3080) • Expansion (ASTM: D 4829) • Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content(ASTM: D 1557) Results of the dry density and moisture content determinations are presented on the Logs of Test Pits, Figures 3 and 4. The remaining laboratory test results are presented on the Laboratory Test Results, Figure 5. SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 1. Geologic Setting The subject site lies within the coastal plain region of northern San Diego County, California. The coastal plain is characterized by numerous regressive marine terraces of Pleistocene age that have been established above wave-cut platforms of the underlying Eocene bedrock and were formed during glacio-eustatic changes in sea- level. The terraces extend from areas of higher elevation approximately 1-mile east of the site and descend generally west-southwest in a "stairstep" fashion down to the present day coastline, with the age of the terraces also decreasing from east to west. The subject property is situated on a portion of marine terrace referred to as the Nestor Terrace (Eisenberg, 1983), which generally comprises the immediate coastal strip along northern San Diego County. The site area is contained within the southwest portion of the USGS Encinitas 7-1/2 minute quadrangle. Based on the results of our investigation, the subject site is underlain by continental terrace deposits that essentially mantle the Pleistocene wave cut terrace surfaces. Structurally, bedding within the terrace deposits is considered to be massive. No known or reported active or potentially active faults exist within the site vicinity, and the site is not located within the presently defined limits of an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Active or potentially active fault zones within the general site region include the offshore extension of the Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood, Coronado Bank/Palos Verdes Hills, and the Elsinore, which are located approximately 4.9-miles southwest, 17-miles southwest and 18-miles northeast from the site, respectively. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4809.1 Log No. 8590 August 26, 2004 Page 4 2. Geologic Units a. Topsoil — The property is mantled by a relatively thin layer of topsoil consisting of dry, loose to medium dense, brown silty fine sand. The topsoil materials are not considered suitable for the support of the structure or improvements in the existing condition. b. Terrace Deposits — Continental terrace deposits underlying the topsoil and encountered in our exploratory test pits consist generally of dry to damp, medium dense to dense, orange brown silty fine sand. 3. Groundwater No seepage or static groundwater was encountered in the exploratory test pits. It should be noted, however, that fluctuations in the amount and level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall, irrigation, and other factors that may not have been evident at the time of our field investigation. SEISMICITY The site is located within the seismically active southern California region. There are, however, no known active or potentially active faults presently mapped that pass through the site. Active fault zones within the general site region include the Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood, Coronado Bank/Palos Verdes Hills, and Elsinore, which are located approximately 4.9-miles southwest, 17-miles southwest, and 18-miles northeast from the site, respectively. Strong ground motion could also be expected from earthquakes occurring along the San Jacinto and San Andreas fault zones, which lie northeast of the site at greater distances, as well as a number of offshore faults. The following table lists the known active faults that would have the most significant impact on the site: Maximum Probable Fault Earthquake Slip Rate Fault (Moment Magnitude) (min/year) Type Rose Canyon (8km/4.9-miles SW) 6.9 1.5 B Coronado Bank/Palos Verdes Hills (281=/17-miles SW) 7.4 3 B Elsinore (Julian Segment) (29.5km/18-miles NE) 6.8 5 B HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4809.1 Log No. 8590 August 26, 2004 Page 5 SEISMIC EFFECTS 1. Ground Accelerations The most significant probable earthquake to affect the property would be a 6.9 magnitude earthquake on the Rose Canyon fault zone. Depiction of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis utilizing a consensus of historical seismic data and the respective regional geologic conditions that are shown on the "The Revised 2002 California Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Maps" (Reference 8) indicates that peak ground accelerations of about 0.20 to 0.308 are possible with a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50-years. 2. Ground Cracks The risk of fault surface rupture due to active faulting is considered low due to the absence of known active faulting on site. Ground cracks due to shaking from seismic events in the region are possible, as with all of southern California. 3. Landsliding The risk of seismically induced landsliding affecting the site is considered negligible due to the relatively level topography of the property. 4. Liquefaction The risk of liquefaction is considered low due to lack of shallow ground water and the dense underlying terrace deposits. 5. Tsunamis Due to the elevation of the property above sea level and distance from the coast, the potential for seismically generated ocean waves impacting the site is considered low. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. General The proposed lot split and construction of a single-family residence with attached and detached garage structures at the site is considered feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Grading and foundation plans should consider the appropriate geotechnical features of the site. The proposed construction is not anticipated to HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4809.1 Log No. 8590 August 26, 2004 Page 6 adversely impact the adjacent properties from a geotechnical standpoint, assuming the recommendations presented in this report and good constriction practices are implemented during design and construction. 2. Seismic Parameters for Structural Design Seismic considerations that should be used for structural design at the site include the following: a. Ground Motion — The proposed structures should be designed and constructed to resist the effects of seismic ground motions as provided in Chapter 16, Division IV-Earthquake Design of the 2001 California Building Code. The basis for the design is dependent on and considers seismic zoning, site characteristics, occupancy, configuration, structural system and building height. b. Soil Profile Type — In accordance with Section 1629.3.1, Table 16-J, and the underlying geologic conditions, a site Soil Profile of Type SD is considered appropriate for the subject property. c. Seismic Zone — In accordance with Section 1629.4.1 and Figure 16-2, the subject site is situated within Seismic Zone 4. d. Seismic Zone Factor (z) — A Seismic Zone Factor of 0.40 is assigned based on Table 16-I. Since the site is within Seismic Zone 4, Section 1629.4.2 requires a Seismic Source Type and Near Source Factor. e. Near-Source Factor (Na and Nv) — Based on the known active faults in the region and distance of the faults from the site, a Seismic Source Type of B per Table 16- U, and Near Source Factors of Na = 1.0 per Table 16-S and Nv = 1.1 per Table 16-T are provided. f. Seismic Coefficients (Ca and Cv) —Using the Soil Profile Type and Seismic Zone Factor along with Tables 16-Q and 16-R, the Seismic Coefficients Ca= 0.44 (Na) and Cv= 0.64 (Nv) are provided, or Ca= 0.44 and Cv= 0.70. 3. Site Grading Prior to grading, the area of the proposed structures and improvements should be cleared of surface obstructions and debris, and stripped of vegetation. Materials generated during clearing should be properly disposed of at an approved location off- HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4809.1 Log No. 8590 August 26, 2004 Page 7 site. Holes resulting from the removal of buried obstructions should be backfilled with compacted fill. Old septic systems, if encountered, should be removed in accordance with local regulations. Within the limits of the proposed structures, driveway and hardscape improvements and to 3-feet beyond, the existing topsoil should be removed down to approved terrace deposits and replaced with compacted fill in order to achieve design finish grades. Removal depths are anticipated to extend approximately 2-feet below the existing grade. Final removal depths should be determined by the Geotechnical Consultant during site grading. Following removals, the exposed subgrade should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted to at least 90-percent relative compaction. Fill should be compacted by mechanical means in uniform horizontal lifts of 6 to fl- inches in thickness. All fill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90-percent based upon ASTM: D 1557-00. The on-site materials are suitable for use as compacted fill. Rock fragments over 6-inches in dimension, perishable and unsuitable materials should be excluded from the fill. All grading and compaction should be observed and tested, as necessary, by the Geotechnical Consultant. 4. Foundation Recommendations The proposed structures may be supported on conventional continuous/spread footings founded at least 12-inches into approved compacted fill or terrace deposits for one-story structures and 18-inches for stow-story structures. Continuous footings should be at least 12-inches wide for one-story structures and 15-inches wide for two- story structures, and reinforced with a minimum of two #4 bars, one top and one bottom. Foundations located adjacent to utility trenches should extend to below a 1:1 plane projected upward from the bottom of the trench. Foundations bearing as recommended may be designed for a dead plus live load bearing value of 2000-pounds-per-square-foot. This value may be increased by one- third for loads including wind and seismic forces. A lateral bearing value of 250- pounds-per-square-foot per foot of depth and a coefficient of friction between foundation soil and concrete of 0.35 may be assumed. These values assume that footings will be poured neat against the foundation soils. Footing excavations should be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to the placement of reinforcing steel in order to verify that they are founded in suitable bearing materials. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4809.1 Log No. 8590 August 26, 2004 Page 8 Slab-on-grade floors should have a minimum thickness of 4-inches and should be reinforced with #3 bars spaced at 18-inches, center-to-center, in two directions, and supported on chairs so that the reinforcement is at mid-height in the slab. A 4-inch layer of clean sand should underlie slabs with at least a 10-mil visqueen vapor barrier placed at mid-height in the sand. 5. Retaining Walls Retaining wall foundations should be designed in accordance with the previous building foundation recommendations. Retaining walls free to rotate (cantilevered walls) should be designed for an active pressure of 35-pounds-per-cubic-foot (equivalent fluid pressure) assuming level backfill and 50-pounds-per-cubic-foot (equivalent fluid pressure) assuming 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) backfill consisting of the granular on-site soils. Walls restrained from movement at the top should be designed for an additional uniform soils pressure of 8xH pounds per square foot where H is the height of the wall in feet. Any additional surcharge pressure behind the wall should be added to these values. Retaining walls should be provided with adequate drainage to prevent buildup of hydrostatic pressure and should be adequately waterproofed. The subdrain system behind retaining walls should consist of at least 4-inch diameter Schedule 40 (or equivalent) perforated (perforations down) PVC pipe embedded in at least 1-cubic- foot of 3/4 inch crushed and washed rock per lineal foot of pipe all wrapped in approved filter fabric. Recommendations for wall waterproofing should be provided by the project Architect and/or Structural Engineer. 6. Temporary Slopes Temporary slopes necessary during grading or to facilitate the construction of retaining walls may be cut vertically up to 3-feet where the cuts are not influenced by existing property line constraints or improvements. Temporary slopes higher than 3- feet and/or cuts exposing topsoil, or potentially weak materials should be inclined at a ratio no steeper than 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) or shoring will be necessary. Field observations by the Engineering Geologist during grading of temporary slopes is recommended and considered necessary to confirm anticipated conditions and to provide revised recommendations if necessary. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4809.1 Log No. 8590 August 26, 2004 Page 9 7. Soluble Sulfate A representative sample of the on-site soils was submitted for sulfate analyses. The result of the soluble sulfate test per EPA 9038 methods is presented on the attached Laboratory Test Results, Figure 5. The sulfate content of the on-site soils is consistent with a negligible sulfate exposure classification per Table 19-A-4 of the 2001 California Building Code. Consequently, special provisions for sulfate resistant concrete are not considered necessary. 8. Trench and Retaining Wall Backfill All trench and retaining wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90-percent relative compaction based upon ASTM: D1557-00 and the backfill should be observed and tested by the Geotechnical Consultant. 9. Driveway Pavement The driveway pavement section should be determined following grading and should be based on R-value testing of the pavement subgrade soils. 10. Site Drainage The following recommendations are intended to minimize the potential adverse effects of water on the structures and appurtenances. Surface drainage should be designed by the project Architect and/or Civil Engineer. a. Consideration should be given to providing the structures with roof gutters and downspouts that discharge to an area drain system and/or to suitable locations away from the structure. b. All site drainage should be directed away from the structures. On-site soils are generally sandy in nature and considered erodible if exposed to concentrated drainage. c. No landscaping should be allowed against the structures. Moisture accumulation or watering adjacent to foundations can result in deterioration of wood/stucco and may affect foundation performance. d. Irrigated areas should not be over-watered. Irrigation should be limited to that required to maintain the vegetation. Additionally, automatic systems must be HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4809.1 Log No. 8590 August 26, 2004 Page 10 seasonally adjusted to minimize over-saturation potential particularly in the winter (rainy) season. e. All yard and roof drains should be periodically checked to verify they are not blocked and flow properly. This may be accomplished either visually or, in the case of subsurface drains, by placing a hose at the inlet and checking the outlet for flow. 11. Recommended Observation and Testing During Construction The following tests and/or observations by the Geotechnical Consultant are recommended: a. Observation and testing of removals and placement of compacted fill. b. Foundation excavations prior to placement of forms and reinforcing steel. c. Interior and exterior utility trench backfill. d. Retaining wall backdrain and backfill. e. Flatwork and pavement subgrade. 12. Grading and Foundation Plan Review Grading and foundation plans should be reviewed by the Geotechnical Consultant to confirm conformance with the recommendations presented herein or to modify the recommendations as necessary. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our investigation and further assume the excavations to be representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site. If different subsurface conditions from those encountered during our exploration are observed or appear to be present in excavations, the Geotechnical Consultant should be promptly notified for review and reconsideration of the recommendations. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4809.1 Log No. 8590 August 26, 2004 Page 11 Our investigation was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable Geotechnical Consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions, please call this office. Sincerely, Hetherington Engineering, Inc. y Cohen ul A. Bogs Registered Civil Engi 7 Registered Geologist 3772 Geotechnical Engi S��Nq Certified Engineeri 3 (expires 3/31/06 � 'o�NY CohF+ F'LG, (expires 9/30/06) c� ti socSF�Fpl No.2346 EG.1153 E*oae Mike Vasconcello >1 �F�AUFp�� �OF �p1,1F�Q Staff Geologist Distribution: 4-Addressee Attachments: Location Map Figure 1 Plot Plan Figure 2 Logs of Test Pits Figures 3 and 4 Laboratory Test Results Figure 5 HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. REFERENCES 1. Kennedy, Michael P., "Geology of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, California, Section A (Western San Diego Metropolitan Area)," California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 200, dated 1975. 2. Weber, Harold F., Jr., "Recent Slope Failures, Ancient Landslides, and Related Geology or the North-Central Coastal Area, San Diego County, California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 82-12LA, dated 1982. 3. Jennings, Charles W., "Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas," California Data Map Series, Map No. 6, dated 1994. 4. California Division of Mines and Geology, "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California, Oceanside, San Luis Rey, San Marcos, Encinitas and Rancho Santa Fe 7.5' Quadrangles," Plate 1, Open-File Report 96- 02, dated 1996. 5. ICBO, "Maps of Known Active Faults Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada,"dated February 1998. 6. Peterson, M., Beeby, W., Bryant, W., et al., "Seismic Shaking Hazard Maps of California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 48, dated 1999. 7. ICBO, "California Building Code," 2001 Edition. 8. Cao, Tianging, et al "The Revised 2002 California Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps," dated June 2003. 9. San Dieguito Engineering., "As Built"Preliminary Plot Plan, undated. Project No.4809.1 HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Lo°No.8590 N O Z > E C M C9 5 O LL a. U U) o'c�3 c H � c 00 LL W 8 O cal O Z U Z U W O W ~LU Q. d .09=A :31VOS W 9 J 0 p Z zz B W J W cn a � oF- z W J z U Oz (' U Z LU O W W 2 � W 2 SZSS—£SL 09L 'ON NOW ONI `ON1833NION3 011(10310 NYS -3NVN IA83F if3 cn (7 n a Z w g W� 3i E a F- w z � ? M o cD I Z CV W i W W N Lo < ! Q N z Z z () Q W Z t W W _ w T s - n j o � f' U v o U O Q N W O � W - � G • LL W �.. .T 0",r� 7 V) I r � U 1 •1 .y1 4 uj yt ` •j •IIrT I / I W 2 S6SS-2SL 09L 'ON 3NOHd 9N1 `9NIa33N19N3 01;(19310 NVS :MVN MOM O N �n z t, a � n z ca c0 � M O cyl a U N W W I Ln < Q N Z Z W V Q z r w W L : a f Nn a O a a 'd I A a K w �w A .-. w n U I z w 2 • � Z 4 BACKHOE COMPANY: Mansolf Excavation BUCKET SIZE: DATE: 07/29/04 w "? SOIL DESCRIPTION > E- a H U U w H F E- z El w l x a l F I H z H `� ELEVATION: 389 Q I Q a o o TEST PIT NO.TP-1 ravelly silty fine to medium grained 0.0 TOPSOIL: Medium brown g sand, d loose, roots TERRACE DEPOSITS: Light brown to orange brown,fine to i t roots, highly 117 4.0 �i �� medium grained sand, dry, loose, porous, abundan I i weathered li @ 2': Orange brown, silty fine to medium grained sand, moist, dense 5.0= Total Depth 4 Feet No Caving Water � No i I I II I I 10.0 j I, I 15.0 TEST PIT NO.TP-2 ELEVATION: 393 0.0 TOPSOIL: Medium brown gravelly silty fine to medium grained sand, d loose, roots TERRACE DEPOSITS: Orange brown to brown,fine to medium grained sand, dry to damp, medium dense, porous, roots @ 2': Orange brown, silty fine to medium grained sand, damp to — ! I moist,dense Total Depth 3.5 Feet 5.0 II l No Caving No Water I � i JIB it Ij i II 'I 10.0-1 I �i it II II J I II i I 115.0 LOG OF TEST PITS I 1050 Crest Drive 7G 1EOTECHNICAL RINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Encinitas, California CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 4809.1 FIGURE NO. 3 _ DATE: 07/29/04 BACKHOE COMPANY: Mansolf Excavation BUCKET SIZE: SOIL DESCRIPTION wIH H z �U v H w a m H� `� ELEVATION: 394 4 it xlQ 14 q Q o o o o I TEST PIT NO.TP-3 U 0.0 TOPSOIL: Medium brown gravelly silty fine to medium grained sand, dry, medium dense, roots TERRACE DEPOSITS. Orange brown to brown line to medium li grained sand, dry to damp, dense, roots to 21 inches 108 5.3 i II J Total Depth 3.5 Feet 5.0 No Caving No Water it I ,I I 10.0 l �I 15.0 I LOG OF TEST PITS 100 Crest Drive Encinitas, California HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. II FIGURE Ni 4 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS I PROJECT NO. 4809.1 BACKHOE COMPANY: Mansolf Excavation BUCKET SIZE: DATE: 07/29104 a �? SOIL DESCRIPTION w F I � z v Ul F w x a H � w C `' ELEVATION: 394 Q w Q Q Q Q, 0 0 6P io 'I TEST PIT NO.TP-3 0.0 TOPSOIL: Medium brown gravelly silty fine to medium grained � sand, d medium dense, roots TERRACE DEPOSITS: Orange brown to brown,fine to medium 108 5.3 I grained sand, dry to damp, dense, roots to 21 inches 5.0-1 I I Total Depth 3.5 Feet No Caving No Water 10.0 l 15.0 LOG OF TEST PITS 1050 Crest Drive HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Encinitas, California i FIGURE NO. 4 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS I PROJECT NO. 4809. LABORATORY TEST RESULTS DIRECT SHEAR (ASTM: D 3080) Sample Location Angle of Internal Cohesion n ,Remarks Friction (°) Remolded to 90%relative compaction, TP-1 @ 1' 33 100 consolidated, saturated, drained SULFATE TEST RESULTS (EPA 9038) Sample Location Soluble Sulfate in Soil(%) 0.0381 TP-1 @ 0-6" 0.0204 TP-1 V 0.0389 TP-1 2' EXPANSION INDEX (ASTM D: 4829) Initial Compacted Final Expansion Expansion Sample Location o Potential Moisture (/o) Dry Moisture Index Density (%) ( cf) 0 Very Low 8.9 114.4 12.8 TP-1 0-6" 115.0 13.0 0 Very Low TP-1 @ V 7.3 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY/OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM 1.557-00A) Descri tion Maximum Dry Optimum Moisture Sample Location p Den ( c Content{%) 122.5 9.5 TP-1 V Orange brown silty sand 8.5 TP-1 @ 2' Orange brown silty sand 131.0 Figure No. Project No.4809.1 Lod No 8590 Recording Requested By And THE ORi6INAL OF THIS DOCUMENT When Recorded Mail To: ) WAS RECORDED ON JUN 29, 2004 DOCUMENT ODER 2004-04718 GREGORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE TIME: 11:02 AM City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 S.Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas,CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Assessor's Parcel Case No.02-215 TPM/CDP No.259-260-36 A. Kenneth J. Spencer and Gay Spencer, as Trustees under the Kenneth J. Spencer and Gay Spencer Trust Agreement dated November 21,2003,(hereinafter"OWNER")is the owner of real property which is commonly known as 1050 Crest Drive (hereinafter"PROPERTY") and which is described as follows: LOT 2, BLOCK H, PALOMARES HIEGHTS ANNEX, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,ACCORDING TO MAP NO. 2136, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 25, 1928. (EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 188.5 FEET THEREOF) B. In consideration of the approval of Case No. 03-229 TPM/CDP by the City of Encinitas (hereinafter "CITY"), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit as follows: See Attachment"A":Notice of Decision No.PBD 2004-43,dated May 13,2004 C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure encumbrances against the benefits of the future owners, successors,heirs, personal representatives,transferees and assigns of the respective parties. PBD\EY\g:\Covenant\03-229tpmcdp.cov.doc - 1 - D. OWNER agrees that OWNER'S duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant,the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees,from the other parry. F. Failure of OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. G. Upon OWNER'S satisfaction of OWNER'S duties and obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and CITY shall execute a Satisfaction of Covenant. H. By action of the City Council,CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant,the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: �. OWNERS- Dated Dated � Z �� by Ke e J. Spencer Dated b�` © by Ga Spenc (Notarization of OWNER'S signature is attached.) CITY OF ENCINITAS: Dated_ j �i z by l,�t/ CJ 2�iTi�PL[i Bill Weedman,City Planner (Notarization not required) PBD\EY\g:\Covenant\03-229tpmcdp.cov.doc -2- CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of On DOE 4, before me, Name and'Iiitle of U1­1 A(e.g."Jane Doe,Notary Pu Date blic")ff personally appeared Names)of Signer(s) personally known to me proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) -Ware ) subscribed to the within instrument and LM*A 000MN acknowledged to me that hels&he/they executed Cown on*1410601 the same in hi&kher/their authorized 14oks yFA'ft' capacity(ies), and that by bisl.#er/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or OonI�:I��Ma>r4. the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I WITNESS,,my hand and offs ial seal. Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public J OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law,it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached oc ment Title or Type of Document: j2kk Q Document Date: Number of Pages: ` w� Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: i Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: 0 Individual Top of thumb here ( ❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s): ❑ Partner—❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact XTrustee Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: I Signer Is Representing: �i 827 ©1997 National Notary Association•9350 De Soto Ave.,P.O.Box 2402•Chatsworth,CA 91313-2402 Prod.No.5907 Reorder:Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6 City of Encinitas PLANINING AN D BUILDING DEPARTMENT 505 So.Vulcan Ave. Encinitas,CA 92024 (760)633-2710 NO'I'I CE OF DF CI SI ON PBD 2004-43 May 13,2004 This letter's to inform you that the Planning.and Building Director has approved your application for: � Iy/CDP (Spencer) — A Tentative Parcel Map and Coastal Development Permit to 03-229 TP subdivide a 1.17-acre (net) lot into two (2) parcels mith the preservation of an existing sin-3e- site. residence and guest house on the site. The project site is one of the City of Encinitas family within the R-3 (Residential 3) Zoning District and the Coastal Zan (Ap;1:259-260-3b)._ and Discussion: The subject property is situated on the -side ies�den�� a Project Description exists with a single-family between Santa Fe Drive and Melba Road. The property esthouse, a detached garage, and several other acce'ssoryn d to the Crest Drive frontage.at With n grade of approximately 5%gradually sloping an average slope g PP acres and Parcel 2 at ro sed subdivision entails the creation of two(2) lots- Parcel eeatO section.of property fronl ng .The p p° 0.45 acres. The lot areas are net areas reflect a discount of an -foot p Crest Drive. The same frontage area is encumbered v�'ithThe conditions of approval for the p otposed the County of San Diego; for county highway Purposes 'Tentative Parcel Map include a requirement to dedicate th�n°omonformtto the Cit�'��s cEurrent standard prior grant of easement does not include all of the p,th for right-of-way dedication. The existing easement or the Crest Drive along dedication e propem'frontage. The a minimum half-Width nght-of--way section of 27 feet for subdivision design for Parcel l maintains an existing. driveway °Tentative Pare MaP At this�iime,there is location for Parcel 2 onto Crest Drive is also identified no grading proposed in conjunction m ith the subdivision. The applicable development standards of the R-3 7-offing f 80 teed wide uand 00 feetlde p.a As 14.500 square feet (0.33 acres), and minimum lot dim ens� designed; the minimum lot dimensions for the TPM adensity allowed oa he-subject Rj3 -on'n°Zisi i p exceed the zoning standards. The maximum residential° it 3 0 dwelling units per net acre. Net acreage calculations indicate a maximum of 3.51 dwelling units encally rounded to 3) could be developed on the 1.17-acre site. Since denpty limitations'of the (num . results in the creation of TWO (2) residential lots_ the project is consistent Municipal Code and General Plar,. The applicant has submitted letters of available services and these attest to the availability of all neeessar\' ser`ices(including fire. water. sani tation.and sehol div.,-ict)to The proposed subdivision. v".i\od�0�-2:9trrncd�no�.tioc a covered arking structure on the proposed Parcel 2 lot that Would P r el In Currently.there exists P Southerly Property line non-conforming with a zero side-yard setba hews at �o l fe in height exist t the rear of Parcel 2: addition;three (3) other accessory structures ( ) setback non-conforms to th�°se avce 'or}' however, the proposed subdivision would not effect any ty . Nonetheless, all four (4) of the structures; currently having �"accessory" proposed su paz e� would -structures dwelling unit on lose that status without the existence of a pri mary g Accordingly, the applicant proposes to remove these structures P to heir PPstatus asP a`c 'on g g with regard such that there would be no zonin non-conformity structures'. The approval of the TPM includes a condition (No. SCB) stipulating the requirement 30 remove these structures pnor to the approval of the Parcel Map. The applicant conducted a Citizen's Participation Program (CPP) to accordance with Chapter 23:06 of the Municipal Code. A public meeting was held on December attended the meeting.n� �i d��� -Participation Report,the project engineer and 3 neighbors atten no one expressed opposition to the subdivision and that all inquiries were addresed at that time. 1\u comments were received by the Planning Division staff during the application revlew. SW -standard public notification was issued and published for the n`'e �"e�o coinmen A P Development Permit application, which allowed fora 20-day comment received by the Planning Division staff during the noticed Comment period. This approval is based on the following findings: FINDINGS FOR A TE3�'TATIVE PARCEL hfAP STANTDARn Section 66474 of the California. Government Code requires that the resent d4 OiOnP agency approve an application for a Tentative Map unless,ba a Pp�the kes any of the followw the application and during the Public Hearing,the authorized b findings of fact: a. That the proposed.map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451 of the Subdivision Map Act. s no specific plan associated with the subject Property. The General Facts/Dis cussion: There i Plan allows for single family residential development a�7 ion i cfln nt �oib the fieln.ral Plan per net acre in the subject R-3 zone. The 2-lot .ubd density range for the R-3 zone. Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department finds that the proposed map is M'sis"ent with the General Plan. design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicW b. That the des general and specific plans. ar for Facts/Disrussiou: Chapter 24.12 of the Municipal Code a�e�ort mernIn stands uch as subdivisions and Chapter 30.1�j of the Municipal Code sets foil P lot v�'idth.depth,and area requirements for the subject R-3 zofnrOP�pawa � exceeds the applicable development and design standards Code. Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department finds that the design of the subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and Municipal Code. C. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development. Facts/Discussion: The site contains sufficient area o permit are 2-lot ot in a and-the future nth the development of a single-unit residence on the propose g was for the development standards for the R-3 Zoning District. In addition.the resultant building subdivided lots will allow future residential develop rendered nonnconforming as to its dee yard covered parking structure existing on the site v.�ll be r a re setback; however, the conditions of approval for the project,� plain additioneTcertainoother removal of the structure prior to the appro�al of the ' status and existing accessory structwes are also required to be removed as their "accessory" same-parcel relationship to the existing primary dwelling unit on the proposed Parcel ] lot will be lost as a result of the subdivision. Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department finds the subdivision project is designed in such a manner to accommodate future development upon Parcel able development trstandards of The accessory structures on the site,in conformance Mth�e app subject R-3 zone. ysically suitable for the proposed density of development. d That the site is not ph Facts/Discussion: The proposed 2-lot subdivision is consistento with ed a maximum ddensity of 0 Plan density range for the R-3 Zoning District: y�hrch is afforded dwelling units Per acre. The net acreage calculations project omcliesrw th the General Plan densifity maximum density of two(2)units. 'Therefore,the pr P provisions for the subject R-3 zone. Conclusion• The Planning and Building Departmen finds that the subject site is physically suitable for the proposed potential density of development. C. Thai the design of the subdivision or of the proposed improvements is likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidably injwe fish or v�ildlife or theirhabitat. Faets/Discussion: The project has been determine U�deli exempt hick exemptso he'edi environmental revieW. pursuant to Section 15315 of the Stale CEQA G propem in urbanized areas zoned for residential use zonin four.n orariancesPoriexceptions are division is in conformance wllb the General Plan an t- standards required_ all services and access to the proposeparcelsehin the pre ous 2 available the parcel \vas not Involved in a division of a larger p parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. No: nsitive species or sensitive -5AXod�03'229-,pMcdpnoc-eac _ are resent on the project site. The site is fully disturbed and p�nlnr near the project developed v6tb habitats p an existing single family dwelling. No Wetland or riparian habitat exists o site. Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department finds that the design of the subdivision and of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause subs'�atttial environmental damage or substantially or avoidably inure fish or wildlife or their habitat. f. That the design of the subdi��ision or the type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems. om fire: fy Facts/Discussion: The applicant has provided letters s raid able availability erve the project. s motion; water,and school districts which state that all services e Conclusion: The Planning and Building Department finds that; since all necessary services can be P rovided for the proposed project, the design of the subdivision and of the proposed improvementsis not likely to cause serious public health problems. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, 'f acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of.Pa m p if it find that lternate q subdivision. In this connection,the authorized agency may appro easements.for access or for use,will be provided,bsection shall eapply onlsubstantially to easements ements of record r ones previously acquired by the public. nits su is to casements established by judgment of a cow of the competent blic ajurisdiction are has acgUi ed-easements hereby granted to a legislative body to determine di P through or use of property Within the proposed subdivision. )l'acts/Discussion:No easements have been identified on the subject property that"Would conflict with the proposed subdivision. the Conclusion: The Planning and Building Deparoment finds that the design�� a UbliC"a lar,er 41or type of improvements will not conflict with any easements, acquired P access through or use of propem within the proposed subdivision. FINDINGS FOR A COASTAL DENTLOPMENT PEFUN TT STAl��ARD: Section 30.80.090 of the >•9uniripal Code provides tbat the sutbori7ed agency must .male the following findings of fact. based upon the information presented in the application and durinb the Public Nearing,in order to approve a coastal development perm 1. The project is consistent wAb the ceniiied Local Coastal Program of the Cit1'of Encinitas:and �, The proposed deg eloprnent conforms with Public Resources Code Section 21000 and following T feasible alterriati �CEQA)in that there are no feasible mitigation measures o �res available which would substantially lessen anv significant adverse impact that the activity may have on the environment;and For projects involving development between the sea or other body of w Leiand one ne-arest public �. P J road, approval shall include a specific finding that such development is public access and public recreation policies of Section 30200 et.ssq.of the Coastal Act. Facts: The City`s General Plan and Municipal Code are the appliiccablsee m-Ppoe proposed parcels CiY! Local Coastal Plan. The project consists of a 2-lot residential s has own are consistent with all applicable zoning code development standards. The project determined to be exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 1 5315 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)Guidelines. D iscussion: Related to finding No. 1,with the approval of the Tentative CP ell Map request:the project complies with or is conditioned to comply with the City s Lo review and Municipal Code. Related to finding No.2,the project act o exempt enmronmen fromlthe prof there is no potential for any significant adverse imp Finding No. 3 is not applicable since the project is not located between the sea or other body of water and the nearest public road. Conclusion' The Planning and Building Department finds that l) the project is consistent with the certified Luca] Coastal Program of the City of Encinitas;2)no potentially significant admrse impacts to the environment will result since the project is exempt s not appl cabl o the pro,JW pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15315;and �)finding since the project site is not located between the sea or other body of water and the nearest public road. )G...•;.nnmental Re�'ieh': This Project has been found to be categorically exempt from enviTonm s review pursuant to Section 15315 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEA) which exempts the division of property in urbanized areas o aw��r n Plies �d zoning: o parcels from envronmental review when: the division variances or exceptions are required, all services and accees to local standards is the aaerage slope�f was not involved in a division of a larger parcel w�thln th pr the parcel is less than 20%. This approval is subject io.the following ronditions: SCI SPECIFIC Ca;\'DTrJONS: al SC4 Approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and all associated unlesrstbe ondit ons have been met or an 5:00 PM. t`vo years after the approval of this project. extension of time has been approved pursuant to the Municipal Cade. SCb This project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application�de"de�niMarch 2. 2004, all December 8. 2003 and a single-sheet Tentative Parcel Map dated r tri:�' 0�163 ;pmcti;nao.Uuc designated as approved by the Planning and Building Director on April 22, 2004 and shall not be altered without express authorization by the Planning and Building Department. SCA This'Tentative Parcel Map approval includes no necessary land d usetand deve opment approvals activities shall be subject to the acquisition of th (including a Design Review Permit) and the acquisition of the necessary construction pernuts in effect at that time. SCB Prior to the approval and recordation of the Parcel Map.. the cove ed pa krerem Jed ur modified three (3) accessory structures existing on the proposed Parcel 2 to to conform to all applicable zoning development standards of the City Municipal Code. SCC The overhead utilities across the site.frontage(s)shall be converted underground systems.U• The subdivider shall be responsible for any and all utility relocati associated with underground conversion of the existing overhead utilities. The applicant has Prop osed to place $20,000.00 in a fund for the conversion o the overhead utilities Cityu�de and this amount is consistent with the cost h conversion eestimated rior to the approval oftth project. Payment of the in-lieu monies to the City shall P Map and the subdivider shall include an acknowledgement that the_in-lieu funds may be used toward conversion of overhead utilities on an as-needed basis City-miIde. ve SCE The subdivider shall provide aright-of--way dedicatioht of-of section o aominimtum of 27Dfeet to effect a half-width (centerline to property, line)ng ? The title report submitted v�'ith the application indicates the existence of an easement granted to the County of San Diego; under instrument number 65-96222.for highway and incidental purposes.th Provided the easement satisfies the requirement for right-of--way dedication City's ineor � der may City's adopted criteria, a right-of:way dedication would not be required. submit the recorded easement documents for review and approval together with the application for approval of the Parcel Map. SCF The subject property is currently being served by a 2-inch water meter. Upon development,each parcel Aill be required to be individually metered to the satisfaction o t e credit a Degui o Water District. The owner may do,,Amsize the existing 2-inch meter and apply capacity installation of new meters. Any capacity credits must secured prior to the sale of any lot. Meters obtained by capacity credit shall be purchased and installed at one time. Prior to the approval of the Parcel Map, the owner is required to provide the San Dieguito Nkater District ,06th a written statement indicating w--hich lot will retain the existing meter. SCG The San Dieguito Water District -Ail] require that wafer metes be alocat os front o f the parcel they are ser�7ng and outside of any existing or proposed travel _ responsibility of the developer. SCN The developer will be required to show all existing and proposed water aDist es on any future improvement or grading plans requinng app ro�°a]b� the San D�egv�to Water 2O9Tpmrdpnod Aoc ply With the San Dieguito Water District's fees,charges:rubs and SC] The developer is required to Com regulations. Gl STANDARD COr'DITIONS: CONTACT CT THE PLANNING N�TNG AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT REGARDING COl<I DANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION(S): G4Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map,the applicant shall cause a covenant regarding real Property to be recorded. Said covenant shall set Sortli the terms and conditions of this grant of approval and shall be of a form and content satisfactory to the Planning and Building Director' 5 Approval of this request shall not waive,compliance with any sections of Code and unless fii PP all other applicable City .regulations in ef!'ect at the time of Building specifically waived herein. Gl3 The subdivider/developer shall pay applicable development fees at thChecking stabblishe 1�,e. and applicable fees may include,but shall not be limited to:Permit and an Sewer Service Fees, School Fees, Traffic Mitigation Feespriorolthe approivlallof th parcel Map, Mitigation Fees,and Fire Mitigation/Cost Recovery Fees. o artment shall approve the Planning and Building Department and the Engineering Services DeP arrangements and agreements for the payment of these fees. Park The Mitigation Fees,tlie�n�advised to contact the Planning and Building Deponent reg t Services Department regarding Flood Control and p Traffic applicable School 'ecovery DFee�s. and regarding School Fees, the Fire Department regard g the applicable Utility Departments or Districts regarding Water and/orSewer Fees. M, This approval maybe appealed to the City Council within 10 calendar days from the date of this approval pursuant to Chapter l-12 of'the Municipal M4 The property owner/developer shall obtain design review permits through the City for homes to be constructed on the lots resulting from the�approved ma oar developerelects to develop the including grading activities,as may apply V. if the properly lots resulting from the approved Parcel-Map acrid Building h Department review Pennit'Section requirement may be waived by the Planning 2.08.030 (7) of the Municipal Code. The Pr p a 1 rnent of the subject,Pr���o planned owner/developer is Planning and Building Department at suth time as to determine whether a design review;permit w�11 Crequired.unt ecordetr toga tonstructive n'Dt a to condition shall be recorded in the offire of the future purchasers of the site. Fl FIRE CON'DTT)ONS: CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING CONIPLIA.NCF M77H THE FOLLONN ING CONDIT)ON(S): G_';�;�d'+03 229�mcdrnod.eoc F2 ACCESS ROADWAY D1M£hS101�S: Access to one (l) single family residence shall not be less than 16 feet of paved width. curb line to curb line..or be e of avers maintainzd o pavement where no curbs are proposed. Access roads ,hall_ support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. Minimum design load is 65:000 lbs. FS GRADE: The gradient for a fire apparatus roadway shall not te aeeo 20.0%. Grades te on exceeding all 15.0% (incline or decline) shall not be permitted without mi L be the installation of automatic fire sprinUer systems aft appropriate the structures l not exceed served. The angle of departure and angle of approach 7%. F6 GATES: All new, gates or other similar structures or devices:N ibi which unless they meetiTetandards roadways or otherwise hinder emergent} operations; P approved by the Fire Department. All automatic gates acrooverriding i c all commandsfunctions PP equipped with approved emergency key operated switches and opening the gate(s). F13 ADDRESS NTUMBERS: Address numbers shall be placed in numbersnshall onitrlast w'�ithetheir be clearly visible from the street fronting the stricture background,and shall be no less in height than:Four inches(4')for single family homes. El Ei�GINTEERING CONDITIONS: TAC? THE ENGITTEERING SERVICES DEPAR'TMEN'T REGARDING COMPLIANCE -CON WITH THE FOLLOWING CONTIJITION(S): E2 All City Codes.regulations.and policies in effect at the time of building/grading permit issuance shall apply. EG1 Gradiii-Conditions: EG3 77ie owner shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any future clearing or grading of the site. ED1 Drainace Conditions ED 5M The developer shall pad'the current local drainage area fee prioNrit e with issuance the MasterbDrainage�Plan for this project or shall construct drainage systems J conformance and Cite of Encinitas Standards as required by the Engineering Services Director. gSl Street Conditions LESS Prior to any -,vor1, being performed in the public right-of-Wav-a right-of-w'aY, cons-iruction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Ser\7ces Director and appropriate fees paid. in addition to any other permits required_ 01:d oc od1k)3-2291prncdpn0 s EUl Utilities EU2M The developer shall comp])' with all the rules. Bell.and other tions and design requirements of the rvi respective utility agencres regarding seces to the project EU3M The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.& E•,SBC/Pacifi applicable authorities. ESWI Storm Water Pollution Control Conditions ESV13 Any future development may be subject to the implementation of the following 13at Practices for storm water pollution controls to the satisfaction�off the o Management p� Engineer. The surface run street and/or into the public grass system. If pipes are collection and discharge onto maximum ras and used for area drainage. inlets shall aass lined to allow, ch reinforced with flow erosion ontrol'blanket or a non-erodable landscape areas. A grass rip-rap lined drainage ditch shall be used instead t w of a=ard grassy and landscaped aareas- Hardscaped areas and driveways shall be slope site topography Driveways with a grass- or gravel-lined swale in the middle can be used if the does not allow for the discharge of driveway. runoff O� � storm m for the subdivision shall identify all landscape areas a er pollution control (SV►TPC). A note shall be placed on the plans indicating t at the modification or removal of the SVRC facilities without a permit from the Cat) is pr E Su19 Any future development in subject to the following storm�►'a az�ll�rior controls: collecuon�and from all roof drains shall discharge onto grass and landscape P discharge onto the street and/or into the public stool bdmod fled tbGrass and landscape from th 4Ctty designated for storm water pollution control shall n tan for the subdivision. A note to this effect shall be placed on the grading p and Building Department only. Additional permits. This notice constitutes a decision of the Planning t including Building Permits.may be required by the Building Department regr other for the type oDepartments.r jest the property owner's responsibility-to obtain all necessary pe proposed. In accordance with the provisions of Municipal Code Section 1.12. nation.roThe appeal must�betfrled. City Council within ten �]0) calendar days of the date _ accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.prior o 3:oo p.m.1cl he Department calm ar day reference t�d bove this notice of decision. The action of the Planning and w item may not be appealed to the California Coastal Commission. od,0 229tpm:dpnod.do: 9 if you have any questions regarding this determination,please contact Eugene Ybarra at the Planning and Building Department, 505 S.Vulcan Avenue.Encinitas. CA 92024.or (760) 6':)3-2698- Patrick Murphy Planning and Building Department Director G'NIo-IQ3-229cpmcdpnod.acw l0 THE Ok,uINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT 08 RECORDED ON JUN 29, 2004 Recording Requested By: DOCUMENT NUMBER 2004-0606717 J SMITH, RECORDER City Planner ) SAN DIEGO COUNTYRECORDER'SOFFCE TIME: 11:02 AM When Recorded Mail To: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY FUTURE PARK,TRAFFIC,AND FLOOD CONTROL FEES Assessor's Parcel Number: 259-260-36 Project No. TM/M`QP/DR/CDP 03-229 A. Kenneth J. Spencer and Gay Spencer, as Trustees under the Kenneth J. Spencer and Gay Spencer Trust Agreement dated November 21, 2003 ("OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property commonly known as TM 03-229 ("PROPERTY"hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows: As Exhibit"A"which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of Final Map approval for the above referenced project by the City of Encinitas ("CITY" hereinafter), OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment"B"which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the other parry. F. Failure of the OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. def fees cov 03-229 TM, 9025 TPM Spencer Crest DR. G. Upon OWNER's satisfaction of OWNER's duties and obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and CITY shall execute a"Satisfaction of Covenant". H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant,the right to enforce this Covenant against OWNER. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: OWNER Dated Z Z- G Priroame and h le Dated P 'nt name Jrid titl Dated (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached) ATTACH NOTARY HERE CITY OF ENCINITAS DatedC�� -z3/ by (Notarization not required) Bill We dman, City Planner 03-229TPM Spencer Crest Drive ATTACHMENT "A" TO COVENANT 03-229 TM/DR/CDP/EIA Lot 2 , Block H, Palomares Heights Annex, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map therof No. 2136, filed in; the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, October 25, 1928 . Excepting therefrom the Westerly 188 . 5 feet thereof . 03-229TPM Spencer Crest Drive PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ATTACHMENT "B" TO COVENANT REGARDING 03-229 TM/MUP/DR/CDP/EIA OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS A. In accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 23.98 in effect at time of fees being paid,park fees for the development shall be paid prior to Final Occupancy approval. B. In accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 23.94 in effect at time of fees being paid,traffic fees for the development shall be paid prior to Final Occupancy approval. C. In accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 23.96 in effect at time of fees being paid, flood control fees shall be assessed and collected during the building permit processing prior to the construction of any impervious surfaces. 03-229TPM Spencer Crest Drive CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ) State of California ss. j County of ) OnCOlU'L-ZZI-1 before me, 1��� t� -W� �Deny Date r� h Name'and fTitle of Officer(e.g.,'Jane`Do ,N�otaryry�PuYbhc ��d ) personally appeared �pT L F L �i"��t-�'v � e �r Name(s)of Signer(s) .j ❑ personally known to me VVproved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence i �t to be the person(s) whose name(s) +stare LESLIE A.COTHRAN subscribed to the within instrument and Commisaon# 1410601 acknowledged to me that 4elehe/they executed NolaXV1111 c.CaMi the same in h�i [l dtheir authorized I sionDNpoCeurMY capacity(ies), and that by hi&"r/their G01M1'LIp��Mo�lo'Z00 signature(s)on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. W TNES my hand and official eal. Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public �I OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document I and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. .j Description of Attached Qpcurnent�, ,,, . J,L '` Title or Type of Document: rG� tom, i`D ,p.�1 j Document Date: �o ��� 9 Number of Pages: fir°� i � 1 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: i Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: i ❑ Individual Top of thumb here ❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s): ❑ Partner—❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: (� Signer Is Representing: �I �j ©1997 National Notary Association•9350 De Soto Ave.,P.O.Box 2402•Chatsworth,CA 91313-2402 Prod.No.5907 Reorder:Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827 THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT 6% RECORDED ON JUN 29, 2004 DOCUMENT NUMB 20044SO6716 Recording Requested by: CALORY J. SMITH, COUNTY RECORDER City Engineer SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE When Recorded Mail TO: TIE: 11:02 AM City Clerk ) City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas . CA 92024 ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER' S USE COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY WAIVER OF PROTEST TO ASSESSMENTS Assessor' s Parcel Work Order 9025 PM Number: 259-260-36 Project 03-229 TPM/CDP A. Kenneth J. Spencer and Gay Spencer, as Trustees under the Kenneth J. Spencer and Gay Spencer Trust Agreement dated November 21, 2003 , ("OWNER" hereinafter) is the owner of real property ("PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is legally described as follows : See Attachment, A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof . B. In consideration of 03-229 TM, OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: No protest shall be made by the owners to any proceedings for the installation or acquisition of street improvements, including undergrounding of utility lines, under any special assessment 1911 or the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 , or any other applicable state or local law, and whether processed by the City of Encinitas or any other governmental entity having jurisdiction in the matter and for the purposes of determining property owners support for same . C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future ewnonal encumbrancers, successors, heirs, representatives, transferees and assi p gns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER' s duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to due property tax bill of the PROPERTY any p as financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant . E. If either party is required to incurs costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorney' s fees, from the other party. F. Failure of the OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant . G. Upon OWNER' s satisfaction of OWNER' s duties and obligations contained herein, OWNER may request and CITY shall execute a "Satisfaction of Covenant" . H. By action of the City Council, CITY may assign to a person or persons impacted by the performance of this Covenant, the right to enforce this Covenant against OWN A PTED AGREED: OWNER _21 41 enneth pencer trustee ay p nc trustee (Notarization of OWNER signature is attached) CI O EN I I S Dated p / 2 � by (Notarization n t required) Peter Co a-Robles, Director of Engineering Services Attachment -A' Legal Description of Real Property 259-260-36 Lot 2 , Block H, Palomares Heights Annex, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map therof No. 2136, filed in; the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, October 25, 1928 . Excepting therefrom the Westerly 188 . 5 feet thereof . CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT _ State of California ss. ' County of .&j �A bq- D I i cTi�r.N�2Z� Z Z� On before me, Date Name and Title of Officer( g Doe,Notary Public") personally appeared ��� �` J ��Name(s)of Signers) Personally known to me roved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) as/are LESLIE A.COTHRM subscribed to the within instrument and Cabe#1410601 acknowledged to me that bels�ie/they executed Nokwh"o-caltanla the same in bislier/their authorized tanOMO�eounA► capacity(ies), and that by bisAter/their WCo ��pM�May9� signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNES my hand and official seal. i Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public I OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law,it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached D�pcu�,ryen C >w f . , bkb Title or Type of Document: ((��Oj�UJt{�t C�'rli T w22LJ'u Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer j Signer's Name: ❑ Individual Top of thumb here ❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s): E3 Partner—❑ Limited El General r ❑ Attorney in Fact t Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: f Signer Is Representing: Prod.No.5907 Reorder:Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827 ©1997 National Notary Association•9350 De Soto Ave.,P.O.Box 2402-Chatsworth,CA 91313-2402 _