1991-2853 CN lCrve sW lCad10f0gy N&dicaf Cjr6up j -Inc.
6941 Brockton Avenue • Riverside, Cafifornia 92506 • (714) 682 -2872
`Thomas P. Cotter, M.D. S. Steve Nfem, M.D.
Raymamd N. 7{ussey, ` -tif.D. 7Xinafd Otto, M- .D.
Ruhard 3. Zauner, M.D. Robert Bridges, ALD. '
%( nan E. Snyder, M.D. `k&%in 3. Chem, 1Af.D.
Raymond P. Sakover, M.D. 'KWiam D. Duge, 7vLD.
C 7 - L ZZimmert an, M.D. ' Donafd =PZ. Nfassee, Nf.D.
Aafl physicians Diplomates of American College of = Radiology
- Aphynm s :Amvuan C kn : \udear :ALediire
August 7, 1992
Hans C. Jensen, P.E.
527 Encinitas Blvd
Encinitas, California 92024
RE: The storm drain at 1638 Neptune Ave.
Dear Mr. Jensen,
Thanks for talking with me regarding the recently installed storm
drain at 1638 Neptune Ave. in Leucadia.
In addition to the excavation done to install the pillars
supporting the height, there are several other items that I would
appreciate your evaluating.
1. A small set of seven stairs at the bottom of the railroad tie
path appear to be undermined and tilted slightly. Several
2 X 4 wooden blocks supporting the south edge of these stairs
are partially dislodged.
2. For some reason, the hard surface of the west - facing
limestone bluff was shaved off adjacent to the main
excavation at the beach level.
3. Also, I am wondering whether the outlet at the bottom end of
the pipe extends far enough from the bluff to prevent further
erosion. Some red paint apparently recently emptied into the
storm drain gives some indication of the proximity of the
drainage to the bluff.
Thanks again for taking the time to look at the situation.
Sincerely yours,
Thomas P. Cotter, M.D. LA r (fit, C t 2-
1648 Neptune Ave.
Leucadia, Ca.
TC /dc�
Billing Office: 1660 Chicago Awntie • Suite x-15 • Rivemside, California 92507 • (714) 781 -2270 • Fax (714) 781 -2293
x City of
Encinitas
May 21, 1992
Mrs. Arlene Mattioli
1638 Neptune Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
Re.: Reimbursement Agreement for Drainage Facilities
Dear Mrs. Mattioli:
We are in receipt of your letter of May 18, 1992, with claims for
reimbursement of construction costs incurred by you, based on the
agreement with the City dated December 18, 1991.
The following work has at this time been completed:
Plans have been completed.
Insituform has installed the pipe lining through the upper
reach of the existing pipe.
Jim Henry Construction has installed the new inlet in Neptune
Avenue.
Jim Henry Construction has completed the work as shown on the
plans.
We can at this time pay the following:
1. Engineering = $ 3,500.00
2. Insituform, one half of $21,850.00 = $10,925.00
3. Henry, full cost of inlet $7500.00 = $ 7,500.00
4. Henry, remainder of agreed amount = $ 9,198.00
Reimbursement as of May 20, 1992 $31,123.00
Less amount paid February 24,1992 - $21,925.00
Reimbursement amount agreement completion =$ 9,198.00
We are initiating the process of accepting the improvements into
the City maintained system, and meanwhile we hope to have the
payment to you shortly.
Sincerely,
H�rfs ar ensen
Subdivi 'on Engineer
gc2787
:;2 F.ncinita5 Boulevard. Encinitas, California 9202 TEI_ 010- Q_t_4_�0»0 FAX
CITY OF ENIDNITAS ENGIN RIN ERMIT
EFFECTIVE DATE PERMIT NO.
-,r ,APPLICANT TO COMPLETELY FILL OUT iZ 20 _ cill
LEFT HAND COLUMN EXPIRATION DATE
w JOB AD ESS'- Z'A - yZ COASTAL NE
,y�
N AS SSOR'S PARCEL O. TYPE OF PERMIT
a 0 t - ❑ PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT
NAME (OR NAME F BUSINESS) to Q;rl iW T_RUCTION ❑ TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT
z S, NF ��
Q MAILING ADDRESS PLAN OF WORK
f> tf ! 1 -, RECEIVED
cc
a CITY, ATE, ZIP �t /G= TELEPHONE PLAN CObI APPROVED
a COST ESTIMATE
NAME RECEIVED
APPR ED
ADDRESS
INSURANCE CERTIFICATE COVERAGE $
co
CITY, STATE, ZIP TELEPHONE 5 . COMPANY
PG z ; i v Cp POLICY N0. c c,ofi .1 �ar4
STATE LICENSE NO. AND TYPE SECURITY AMOUNT $
y �
1 TYPE ❑ '�► r
NAME
El LETTER OF CREDIT
ADDRESS
C C% E] COVENANT k
cc ❑ OTHER
Z ,csY Grp
c�1 - CITY, STATE, ZIP TELEPHONE PERMIT CHARGES
`� i 1✓� �"
APPL. FEE INSP. DEPOSIT OTHER
REGISTRATION NO. ( 3310.0000 ) ( ) ( )
i $ , $ $
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE R.N.
R.N. R.N.
/ "� Gam p'+f#IL... �fT
TOTAL FEES DUE $
SECURITY AND DEPOSIT EXCESS RETURNED TO
-�T� cam, -,/ J. ` ❑ OWNER DATE:
❑,/CONTRACTOR AMOUNT:
} L / SA OTHER - �C L�lt.t` L' �• .
4 . COMMENTS
Ff. -
"� y; � � � ' r •;�S 3`v `gt�%�t�t��+°.� Y'V�r W' i/ t�+� +, �� ��i :.i �s #,�.
y t
s -i224 � r PERMIT O f DATE ISSUED
BSI f1T R ( W NER O , a . x r D E SIGNED
R AGENT) , , O N
INSPECTOR GNATUftE -' '.- tr f r, s ,
PRINT NAME ; ELEPHONE <; `a (Formae c 1 (SIGNAT )� (DATE) { , y
'4
;CHECK IF OWNER AGENT
INAL INSPEC
a To Release Security) (SIGNATURE) A
OTHER
IM PORTAN T PR FIRM 1NHILE WRITI
U
din t. 1.9 w
r7 IA14.,S.114,
JIM HENRY CONSTCICTION, INC. Pa 1 of—L-
721 LA QUEBRADA
OLIVENHAIN, CA 92024 _ State Lic. *aMW&
TELEPHONE: 619- 753 -6031 #496386
To: Ms . ARLENE MATT I OL I Invoice No.: 91 � 0 -7
1636 -38 NEPTUNE AVENUE MAY 18 1992
LEUCADIA, CALIFORNIA 92024 Date:
Attn: MS. MATT I OL I
Project: STORM DRAIN REPAIR /' 6
Location: 1636 -38 NEPTUNE AVENUE (2%
LEUCADIA, CALIFORNIA 92024
Contract No.: P.O. No.:
&cling for Services as Follows:
Date Description Hans Rate Amoum
CONTRACT PRICE - $25,000.00 $25,000.00
PROGRESS PAYMENT
INVOICE DATED 2/18/92 $11,034.97
PAID ON INVOICE 9- 405.00
BALANCE ON INVOICE 1. 629.97
THIS INVOICE $13,965.03
BALANCE OF INVOICE
DATED 2/18/92 + 1.629.97
TOTAL THIS INVOICE= $15 ,595.00
BALANCE DUE _ $15 .595.00
THANK YOU � 1�
NOTICE
- tkder the mecfmxm' ban low (CWarn a OW Code of OW aroced<ra. Sean, 1191 Et Seq.). any ca,aecmr. subronaaaw . sbm m . a,ppisr or other person who helpa to inip your
Property but is not pad for his work or suppfia . hm a riglrt w a c1m. egenat your p aM tY. This means that, after a court I n&irtg, yar property cold be sold by a tart offirar and
the proceeds of the say used to sarrsfy the idebtednese.'71 a can happen even H you have paid your own contractor in ". d the subcontractor. isborer or sucoier renws canard."
_� �� •. j .. + f < <�'�"" / i, �• -u'c —Z �.... - -. i ��� 1. C
_ r ,
, ,.__.+7 � r � �`� f/ / ' l L ��. � � � ✓i�'� r'��. �.��..! -/r � .�._ - -�
11
/ f
w ,
, V
• r
.' lid- 'Z-- '` -. / ti- . / �'`U`�-'��- t�>���'"�- � ` � ��L Z� (.•,��L -•K:_, <'�,� G�� f.� r �.r 4.. ar+C� �-^
�"�! `"''��.� /C,Lo ✓� 1 ° "� /'� /tom -C�'� .i'�•�II'"� ✓L��. �i�•l/°L- h.� ..;��/,/ £._:�.•��f L�. �/ - ��,.•�`,, �
f .s
X �_y
` r � ` J .1 f�.
("LA't
CITY OF ENQNITAS ENGINEERIN( PERMIT
APPLICANT TO COMPLETELY FILL OUT EFFECTIVE DATE PERMIT NO.
LEFT HAND COLUMN ! 2 : ►':
EXPIRATION DATE
JOB ADDRESS
w COASTAL ZONE `
t
co
m ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. TYPE OF PERMIT
O - i "f, o A W l ,q t- E - ❑ PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT
1 w NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) i[�CTRUCTION ❑ TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT
z
3
O MAILING ADDRESS
} PLAN OF WORK
RECEIVED
cc
a CITY, STATE, ZIP TELEPHONE PLAN �`' t` APPROVED `c8
O
T COST ESTIMATE
r RECEIVED
NAME
APPRQYED
O ADDRESS �ALTON S
ry Q INSURANCE CERTIFICATE COVERAGE $
Z CITY, STATE, ZIP TELEPHONE
,. COMPANY
tc ,.i_ q.' POLICY NO. I- w- .t
STATE LICENSE NO. AND TYPE
SECURITY AMOUNT $
NAME TYPE ❑ CASH
❑ LETTER OF CREDIT
ADDRESS [] COVENANT
Q s•E:
w ❑ OTHER
w
z
z CITY, STATE, ZIP TELEPHONE PERMIT CHARGES
w
APPL. FEE INSP. DEPOSIT OTHER
REGISTRATION NO.
( 3310.0000 ) t ) ( )
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE DONE $ $
R.N. R.N. R.N.
TOTAL FEES DUE $ *k ttk *"' ,t
SECURITY AND DEPOSIT EXCESS RETURNED TO
❑ OWNER DATE:
❑ CONTRACTOR AMOUNT:
&OTHER
COMMENTS:
1t�k f"L v4 "t i'A'i
t:6ti.4d t:,t$f' 4Y. iif 6
PERMIT ISSUED BY DATE ISSUED
SIGNATURE (OWNER OR AGENT) DATE SIGNED
INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE 8 DATE:
PT 1ST INSPECTION
RIN NAME TELEPHONE
(Forms, etc.) (SIGNATURE) (DATE)
CHECK IF: OWNER ❑ AGENT FINAL INSPECTION
(OTHER (To Release Security) (SIGNATURE) (DATE)
IMPORTANT! PRESS FIRMLY WHILE WRITING APPLICATION
• •
LAW OFFICES OF
CHARLES MARVIN III
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
120 BIRMINGHAM DRIVE, SUITE 200
CARDIFF BY CALIFORNIA 02007
TELEPHONE (610) 044 -0123
FAX (610) 042 -6176
December 18, 1991
Mr. Hans Jensen
City of Encinitas
527 Encinitas Boulevard
Encinitas, CA 92024
Re: Mattioli Drainage Pipe
Dear Hans:
Arlene Mattioli is delivering to you with this letter the
originals of the Drainage Easement and Maintenance Agreement and
the Agreement of Reimbursement Drainage Facility Repair. Those two
documents have been executed by her, and the Drainage Easement
signature has been notarized.
I made a minor change at the beginning of the Drainage
Easement by changing the title from "Drainage Easement" to
"Drainage Easement and Maintenance Agreement ". In addition, I put
in prefatory language at the beginning of the first paragraph of
that document as follows:
"In consideration for the City of Encinitas
agreeing to repair, maintain, replace,
reconstruct and inspect such channel in
perpetuity, . ".
The changes I made confirm the City's responsibility for future
repair of the drainage pipe.
On the Agreement of Reimbursement Drainage Facility Repair,
I added a new Section 5 to reflect the fact that upon the City's
acceptance of the storm drain, the drainage easement goes in place
and the City has the maintenance and repair responsibilities that
we have agreed to. That new provision will set forth the
transition to the drainage easement.
If you have any questions about either of these documents,
please call me immediately. Otherwise, I would appreciate your
having Warren execute the Drainage Easement on behalf of the City
and having his signature notarized, as well as having Warren sign
the Agreement of Reimbursement. I would also appreciate it that
LAW OFFICES OF • •
CHARLES MARVIN III
Mr. Jensen
December 18, 1991
Page Two
if possible, Mrs. Mattioli be given signed copies of both
Agreements while she is at the City Hall so that we may finalize
both matters.
Sincerely,
CHARLES MARVIN III, A.P.C.
Charles Marvi III
CM3 /nk
Enclosures
cc: Mrs. Mattioli
Y City of
Encinitas
Mrs. Arlene Mattioli
1638 Neptune Avenue
Encinitas, CA 92024
December 9, 1991
Dear Mrs. Mattioli:
Enclosed find the reimbursement agreement for the construction of
the storm drain. Please sign the document and return to me at your
earliest convenience.
We have met with your contractor, and we believe that the road is
clear for construction.
We will need to have you re -sign the easement and have your
signature notarized, such that we can record the instrument. We
will also need to have your lender sign the Subordination Agreement
and have their signature notarized. The Subordination Agreement is
the last page of the Drainage Easement document.
We hope to see the completed project shortly.
Sincerely Yours
%"' (W
Hans Car ensen
Subdivision Engineer
cc: Mr. Charles Marvin
527 Encinitas Boulevard, Encinitas, California 92024
TEL 619- 944 -5050 / FAX 619- 632 -9836 recycled paper
March 11, 1991
City Engineer
City of Encinitas
527 Encinitas Blvd.
Encinitas, CA 92024
Subject: Storm Drain
1638 Neptune Ave.
Leucadia, CA 92024
On February 28, 1991, I called at approximately 8:30AM to the
Public Works Department to report that the storm drain at the
edge of my property overflows in a downpour and would they come
and lift the manhole cover to avoid this problem. I spoke to
Donna and she assured me they would. At 12:30PM that same day,
in a down pouring rain I looked out my window and saw water rush-
ing down the stairs on the side of my home. It looked like Niagara
Falls. The water began rising up to the back steps at my kitchen
door. The city had not come as promised. I put on some boots
and went outside only to see the street flooded completely across.
ThU drain couldn't handle the enormous amount of water coming
from the blocks in all directions and it was rushing over into
the driveway and onto both sides of my home. I can't tell you
how horrified I was. As the rain slowed up I was able to find
the manhole cover and with the help of a house guest, lifted it
up and as if by magic the water just flowed down the hole. I
put a ladder across the opening for safety and went to inspect
the flood of water on my property. It washed out the flower
beds and caused a cave in on a brick walkway on the oceanside
of my home. I can't imagine what would have happened to my
property had I not been home and opened the manhole when I did.
I went into the house and called public works again. I got the
answering machine. I called city hall, the operator said that
public works were out to lunch. Right!
I can't stand by any longer and watch my property become des-
troyed more each time we have a storin. I have been trying for
some tone to get something done to stop this problem. In a letter
from Mr. Warren, October 13, 1988, I quote, "the public works
department will closely monitor the basin during the coming
storms and place sandbags if needed to prevent overflow from the
street." Donna said they had emergencies when I got a hold of
her at 1:OOPM. THIS IS AN EMERGENCY! I can't hope to be home
each time the street floods and run out and lift the manhole
cover. And you'd have to sandbag my whole driveway to stop the
water from washing over.
In a January, 1991 at a Coastal Commission meeting with my
attorney and Mr. Warren, Bob said he saw no immediate problem.
The pipe is O.K. It is not O.K. to have my property flood each
time it rains. It is not O.K. to have storm surge washing away
more bluff supporting the pipe below as it did in this last storm.
The pipe is so rusty it could collapse at any time and break off.
It is not O.K. to put me or my property at risk. This whole prob-
lem has existed long enough. It isn't as if no one knew about it.
I first wrote to you in February, 1988. THREE LONG YEARS AGO. My
response has been get permits, engineer reports, estimates, etc.
It's time to stop all the beauracratic rhetoric and cut all the
red tape and take some real action. Use some common sense and give
some special attention to this matter now For God sake why do
we have to wait for a disaster before anything will get done.
Call me anytime at 753 -7554 or my attorney, Charlie Marvin at
944 -0123.
hv
-V. aoll-__�
O
tv-
k-I
S TATE O F C — THE RE AGE* GE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SAN DIEGO COAST DISTRICT re
1333 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH, SUITE 125 !'A
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 -3520
(619) 297 -9740
November 17, 1989
Arlene Mattioli
1638 Neptune Ave.
Leucadia, CA 92024
Re: Application No. 6 -89 -319 (Mattioli)
Dear Mrs. Mattioli:
Recently you received a notice that your application for a coastal development
permit for the repair of a storm drain at 1638 Neptune Avenue, Leucadia was
filed and tentatively scheduled for the December Coastal Commission hearing.
This notice was sent in error due to the fact that the submitted application
file is incomplete.
The file lacks adequate plans for the proposed project, including all repairs
proposed to the existing storm drain and the concrete support structure to be
located on the beach. The Commission's Administrative Regulations require a
coastal development permit for repair and maintenance activities such as that
proposed, due to the proximity of the structure(s) to the bluff and the beach.
The following items are required before your application can be filed and
rescheduled for a Coastal Commission hearing. Please submit detailed project
plans, drawn by a registered engineer and drawn to scale, showing the location
of the_existing and proposed drain and its relationship to the topography of
the bluff, the beach and the existing stairway.
The Coastal Act, as well as the City of Encinitas Zoning Ordinance permit only
limited types of development on the beach and bluff face. The plans should be
accomp by a project specific report, done by an engineer familiar with
coastal processes, identifying alternative methods available to repair the
existing storm drain and the potential impacts to the beach and bluff. The
report should address the appropriate location for the discharge point and
include alternatives which minimize the installation of new structures. The
report should discuss alternative methods for the support of the drain at the
base of the bluff (including the proposed concrete base as one of the
alternatives).
Also, if any of the local approvals identified in the Appendix B of the
application require a local hearing, those approvals need to be received prior
to our filing the application. In any event, you should submit the detailed
plans required above to the City concurrent with our processing, to assure
- ! r
Arlene Mattioli
November 21, 1989
Page 2
proper coordination and review.
Upon completion of the alternatives discussion, I can be available to meet
with you or your engineer and the City, to discuss the alternative which
should be developed. If you have any questions regarding the above
requirements, please do not hesitate to contact me at (619) 297 - -9740.
Sinc rely,
h
Supervisor, Permits and
Enforcement
cc: Robert Warren, City of Encinitas
(0334t)
.a
C,2), zoz
7f
Page 1 • Wednesd *August 23, 1989
ARLENE MATTIOLI
1638 NEPTUNE AVE.
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
(619) 753 -7554
Dear Mayor and Members of the City council:
I am writing to you at the request of the City Manager of Encinitas Mr. Ted
Schade, to inform you about an important drainage problem upon which we have
been working together to solve before it becomes an even greater problem to both
the City and City residents along Neptune Ave.
The matter concerns a drainage pipe which serves the entire community from
the 1400 block of Neptune ave., extending north to the northerly end of Neptune
Ave. and extends east along this same length of Neptune Ave. for a distance of
approximately one block. This single pipe is the only means of drainage for all
storm and residential surface water runoff for approximately 55 homesites, and
serves to carry water from the street down the bluff to the beach along the
northerly border of my oceanfront property. (Please see my letter to the city
council members, dated July 21, 1988 for additional facts, a map of the area
serviced by the pipe and photos of the pipe and drainage facility).
The problem is that this pipe which was constructed of 18" galvanized steel about
20 years ago is now 5 years beyond its expected serviceable lifetime of 15 years.
The exposed portion of the pipe which runs down the surface of the bluff is very
corroded from the salt air and has already developed some holes which threaten to
undermine the very foundation upon which the pipe and several houses lie. The
lower 20 foot portion has so many holes, it is now useless and has caused the
complete loss of the pre- existing support beneath the pipe. (Please see photos
enclosed)
This is the only existing storm drain in this coastal area and no new drains have
been constructed, nor are any planned to be constructed within the immediate
Page 2 • Wednesda4W ugust 23, 1989
future. Yet their has been a great deal of development in this area over the past 20
years which has compounded the amount of runoff waters which this single
deteriorated pipe must now service. New homes along the bluff are required to to
cause drainage to go back to Neptune Ave. from the blufftop. All other new
developments in the area are utilizing this single drain as proof that their is
adequate drainage facilities to carry runoff from their proposed construction sites
safely to the beach. It seems unfair that I should have to bear the burden of
providing drainage of water runoff across my property without assistance from
any governmental entity, when it is governmental approvals that are permitting
the developments which are increasing the surface runoff to and across my
property. This drainpipe serves the entire community, and therefore I believe that
the cost to maintain it should be shared by the community.
This situation is almost identical to that which brought about the catastrophic
collapse of the bluff which the Kuhlmans suffered in Solana Beach (See newspaper
story attached). As you are likely aware, the result of failure to maintain this pipe
of similar age, construction, and service demands was well over $550,000 in
repair costs and has also resulted in litigation against the City. Since I am a widow
with six children, such a disaster would truly be catastrophic for me as I see no
possible means to recover from such an event.
I believe it would be in the best interest of all concerned to resolve this problem
now It would be much less expensive to simply upgrade the drainage facility,
rather than have to repair damages which would result from a failure of that
facility plus replace and upgrade the facility itself.
The proposed solution to the problem as outlined in my letter of July 21, 1988 to
the City included taking the following steps:
1. Repair and /or replacement of the drainpipe which runs under and above my
property along its northern boundary.
2. The upgrading of existing catch basins including but not limited to the
enlargement of the drain openings at both sides of Neptune Ave., and the
Page 3 • Wednesda *ugust 23, 1989
construction of a cement catch basin on the easterly opening to prevent it from
being clogged with surrounding dirt and debris during critical periods, and from
overflowing across my property.
3. To come up with a long range plan to deal with the increasing amounts of
storm water and runoff in this area and to investigate the possibility of redirecting
some of the runoff to an alternate drainage site.
In response to these concerns and proposals the Public Works Staff investigated
the situation. A follow up meeting and final inspection was then held with Mr.
Schade, Jim Baldwin (who is an engineering contractor who specializes in this
type of construction and repair work, and has performed similar work for the
City), and myself. Assessment of the condition of the drainage facility also
included the cleaning of the pipe and basins as well as the making of a video tape
of the interior of the pipe.
The findings confirmed what I had previously reported to the City in my letter.
The catch basins on both sides of the street and the upper portions of the pipe
itself were clogged with mud and debris, the grate inlet to the basin on the east
side of the street was heavily overgrown with vegetation. Staff also noted that the
catch basin on the west side of the street had a restricted opening and no grate.
Several small holes were found along the top of the pipe in the area where the
pipe runs along the surface and the lower 5 to 10 feet of the pipe was found to be
in extremely poor condition being significantly deteriorated along the bottom and
lacking adequate support.
The Staff recommended the following work be performed:
1. Repair minor holes in the pipe, re -seal the exposed portion with a tar coating
and insert a plastic sleeve inside the exposed portion of the pipe to insure against
possible leakage in the future.
2. Replace the lower portion of the drain which outlets onto the beach including a
repair /redesign of the pipe support and spillway at its base. (Approximately 20
Page 4 WednesdaWugust 23, 1989
feet of the pipe needs to be replaced in order to direct drain water away from the
face of the vertical bluff.)
3. Redirect the outlet of all yard drains away from the vertical portion of the
bluff face.
4. Replace the solid manhole cover on the westerly catch basin on Neptune Ave.,
in order to increase the efficiency of the catch basin.
5. Replace the continuous fence over the rear yard grate inlet with a gate to
facilitate grate removal and pipe maintenance.
The Public works staff recommended that I and /or the adjacent property owners
extend all yard drains away from the bluff and provide access to the grate at the
bluffs edge. The city proposed to pay for and install a grated manhole cover in the
street (now in place), and the have the public works department closely monitor
the basins during coming storms and place sandbags if needed to prevent the
overflow from the basin from crossing our property and causing erosion.
It was further proposed that three quotes be obtained to repair the drainage
facility as outlined in the above recommendations ( #1. - #4.) and that the city will
pay one -half the cost of all repair work. The City also agreed to assume all
engineering costs, leaving it up to us to obtain a coastal permit if needed to
accomplish the repair work.
It was further proposed by City staff that once the repairs are completed to the
satisfaction of the City, that the City will assume maintenance responsibilities for
the storm drain facility, provided the necessary easements are granted by me and
my neighbors.
These proposals are outlined in a letter from Robert A. Warren, City engineer,
dated October 13, 1988,(enclosed). Since then we have been working closely with
Mr. Schade and have obtained the three bids as requested in the Cities proposal.
Naturally we are concerned that immediate attention be given to this matter as the
winter storm season is only a few months away threatening the safety of our home
as well as our neighbors to the north and south. It was not until last week that we
lit r� "161
Page 5 Wednesdaougust 23, 1989
were informed that the City council must approve the project because the total
amount of the work which needs to be performed exceeds $10,000. It should
however be noted that the lowest qualified bid on the project would bring the total
cost to the city of only $9,840. (One half of the total cost for the project which
was $19,680.)
I hope that the City Council and Staff will act swiftly and prudently in order to
expedite this project in order to insure against any catastrophic loss to persons and
properties along that portion of Neptune Ave. which this drainage facility serves.
Clearly such action is in the best interest of all concerned.
I would like to thank the Staff of the City of Encinitas, especially the City
Engineer Mr. Robert Warren, and City Manager Mr. Ted Schade for their
support thus far on this project, and would like to thank the City Council members
in advance for their attention to this important matter.
Sind rely,
- 1�� -� � ✓ �� 'cam -���
Arlene Mattioli
L ✓ I RKS
i
•
• E�, � per' � :ate: �`'� „ �� a" Est. �� -
f
J41"
az
i�
•
TSA
A Ca1Ped Company
21n E. Pacific Coast Highway
P.O. Box 7790
Newport Beach, California gz658
714 • 721 • 6920
June 14, 1989
Mr. TOM Faulkner
527 Encinitas Boulevard
Suite 100
Encinitas, CA 92024
Re: Joseph Family Trust
Dear Mr. Faulkner:
Enclosed is the executed Drainage Easement and pertinent pages of the
Joseph Family Trust.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 714 -721 -6930.
Sincerely,
Robert ?tijohn
Assis Vice President
RLP /vrh
Enclosures
TSA
A CaTed Company
1855 First Avenue, Suite ioa
San Diego, California 92101
January 23, 1989 6 1g - 233 .8 762
25- 6353 -00- 2/03- 8/04- 6/01 -2
R40268 -83 -2
Mrs. Arlene Mattioli J K
1638 Neptune Avenue +
Leucadia, CA 92024 L
Re: 1646/48 Neptune Avenue
Leucadia, CA
Dear Mrs. Mattioli:
I am writing in response to your letter of November 1, 1988
regarding the replacement of the drain pipe and the splitting of
the costs between the three parties.
TSA is the Trustee of the Joseph family trust and we are
currently handling the management of the property. After a
meeting with the Cotters, the Joseph family informed us that the
Cotters and themselves agreed that they should only bear one -half
of the remaining costs instead of two - thirds. As you know,
the property is a duplex like yours and does not use more than
one -half of the capacity of the drain.
Please forward ariy estimates or proposals you have on the
replacement. I will be responsible for overseeing and payment of
the Joseph's one - fourth.
If you need anything else from me or would like to discuss
this, please call me at (619) 233 -8762.
Sincerely,
tC ' z`1
Deborah L. Davidson
Sr. Real Estate Officer
DLD:bp
CC: Robert Pettijohn, Trust Officer
I
City of
Encinitas
October 14, 1988
Arlene Mattioli
1636 -38 Neptune Avenue
Encinitas, California 92024
Subject: Storm Drain at 1638 Neptune Avenue, Leucadia
Dear Mrs. Mattioli:
In response to your July 22, 1988 letter raising your concerns
regarding the storm drain adjacent to your property, Public
Works Department staff investigated the situation and has the
following report and proposal to make.
On August 11 Public Works staff performed a site inspection of
the storm drain running under Neptune Avenue and down to the
beach along your north property line. During the inspection, it
was noted that the catch basins on both sides of the street and
the upper portion of the pipe itself were almost half full of
mud and debris (photo #1), and the grate inlet to the basin on
the east side of the street was heavily overgrown with
vegetation (photo #2). Staff also noted that the catch basin on
the west side of the street (photo #3) had a somewhat
restricted opening and no grate.
In your backyard, prior to decending the slope to the beach,
it was further noted that the existing grate inlet cannot be
removed for proper maintenance due to a fence over the top of
it (photo #4) . Decending the slope to the beach, most of the
storm drain is on the surface and appeared to be in fairly good
condition (photo #5). At the beach there is an approximate 8
to 10 foot vertical bluff where the drain extends out onto the
beach and is supported by a wooden structure attached to the
stairway. The last 5 to 10 feet of exposed pipe was
significantly deteriorated along its bottom (photos #6 and #7).
Also, at the foot of the bluff there were approximately four 4-
inch yard- type plastic drain pipes that outletted onto the
beach apparently from your and /or your neighbor's yards (photo
#8). The upper ends of these drains were not located.
TS /03/CL8- 1879wp (10/14/88 -2)
�— Encinitas Boulevard, Encintua , (Ad6rnia 1 )20! 1 619- 944 -70�o
'Arlene Mattioli
s •
Page 2
October 13, 1988
Public Works staff's recommendations from this initial site
inspection on August 11 were to clean out the basins and drain
and to inspect the interior of the pipe with a special pipeline
videotape camera designed for such work. It was arranged for a
pipe cleaning truck to clean the drain on August 16 and, at the
same time, videotape the interior of the pipe.
While cleaning the westerly catch basin, staff discovered that
the reason that it was as full as it was with mud was that a
piece of wood used to originally form the catch basin had never
been removed and was partially blocking the entrance to the
outlet pipe (wood shown in gutter in photo #9)• Once this
obstruction was removed, the basin was easily flushed clear
(photo #10). The grate on the east side of the street was also
cleared of obstructions. Prior to cleaning approximately one
square foot of grate was open and functioning (photo #2). After
clearing the grate, there is now approximately four and one -
half square feet of opening for drainage.
While inspecting the interior of the drains with the pipeline
camera, staff noted that, generally, the 18" pipe running down
to the beach from the westerly catch basin was in very good
condition. Staff did observe several small holes along the top
of the pipe in the area where the pipe runs along the surface.
As mentioned above, however, the lower 5 to 10 feet of the
pipe, at the outlet onto the beach, is in poor condition and
should be replaced in order to direct drain water away from the
face of the vertical bluff. In addition, the four yard drains
should be extended beyond the face of the bluff.
Public Works has the videotape of the inspection itself. You
are welcome to arrange to see it at City Hall.
After performing the inspections reported above, Public Works
staff recommends that the following work be performed:
1. Repair minor holes in the pipe.
2. Replace the lower portion of the drain outletting onto the
beach including a redesign of the pipe support
(approximately 20 feet of pipe needs to be replaced).
3. Redirect the outlet of all yard drains away from the
vertical portion of the bluff face.
4. Replace the solid manhole cover on the westerly catch
basin in Neptune with a grated cover in order to increase
the efficiency of the catch basin.
TS /03/CL8- 1879wp (10/14/88 -2)
"Arlene Mattioli
• •
` Page 3
October 13, 1988
5. Replace the continuous fence over the rear yard grate
inlet with a gate to facilitate grate removal and pipe
maintenance.
Public Works staff recommends that you and /or the adjacent
property owner extend all yard drains away from the bluff and
provide access to the grate in your backyard, immediately. The
City proposes to pay for and install a grated manhole cover in
the street, and the Public Works Department will closely
monitor the basin during the coming storms and place sandbags,
if needed, to prevent overflow from the street. However, the
storm drain clearing performed by the City and the installation
of a grate on the catch basin should allow the drain system to
handle the storm waters.
It is further proposed that you obtain three quotes to perform
the repair of the minor holes in the pipe, the replacement of
the lower portion of the drain and the replacement of the
support and that the City will pay one -half the cost of all
repair work. The City will also assume all engineering and
inspection costs, but it is up to you to obtain a coastal
permit for and accomplish the repair work, yourself, since the
pipe is currently a private structure.
Once the repairs are completed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer, the City will assume maintenance responsibilities for
the storm drain pipe, provided the necessary easements are
granted to the City by you and your neighbor.
If the above proposal is agreeable to you, please let me know
and I will set up a meeting to discuss implementation of the
project. If you have any questions or would like to arrange to
view the inspection videotape, please contact Mr. Ted Schade at
(619) 944 -5070.
Very Truly Yours,
Robert A. Warren
City Engineer
Attachments
TS /03/CL8- 1879wp (10/14/88 -2)
i cx or Encinitas WO
I nteroffice Memorandum
.ROM ��, F sUWEa��.a
t/ti`c a . 4��um� d „s6
44A- 4
� vYtl` Lisa- ndv �`�
nwti�dG+ -� Aandl��
Nht
k*6�a 46
• CITY OF ENCINITAS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Morton F. August, Director of Public Works
Robert A. Warren, City Engineer
FROM: Theodore D. Schade, Willdan Associates
DATE: August 19, 1988
SUBJECT: Storm Drain at 1638 Neptune, Leucadia
At the request of the property owner (see attached letter) and
the Public Works Director, on August 11, 1988, Bob Warren, Pete
Fleuret, Jim Paige and myself performed a site inspection of
the storm drain running under the street and down to the beach
along the north property line of the duplex at 1638 Neptune
Avenue. During the inspection, it was noted that the catch
basins on both sides of the street and the upper portion of the
pipe itself was almost half full of mud and debris (photo #1)
and the grate inlet to the basin on the east side of the street
was heavily overgrown with vegetation (photo #2). We also
noted that the catch basin on the west side of the street
(photo #3) had a somewhat restricted opening and no grate. In
the back yard of the subject property, prior to going down to
the beach, there is a grate inlet that cannot be removed for
maintenance due to a fence over the top of it (photo #4). On
the way down the hill to the beach (approximately 2 to 1 slope)
most of the storm drain is on the surface and appears to be in
fairly good shape (photo #5). At the beach there is
approximately an 8 to 10 foot vertical bluff where the drain
extends out onto the beach and is supported by a 4x4. The last
5 to 10 feet of exposed pipe is significantly deteriorated
along the invert (photos #6 and #7) . Also at the foot of the
bluff there are approximately four 4 -inch yard type drains that
outlet onto the beach (photo #8). The upper ends of these
drains were not located.
Our recommendations after this initial site inspection on
August 11 was to clear out the basins and drain and to inspect
the interior of the pipe with a pipeline camera. It was also
recommended at this point that a hydrology study be performed
to determine the amount of water carried by the drain.
Pete Fleuret arranged for the City of Oceanside to lend
Encinitas a sewer clearing "Vactor" truck and a pipeline camera
on August 16. The Oceanside crew and equipment spent
approximately 3 hours clearing and videotaping the storm drain
system. While clearing the westerly catch basin we discovered
that the reason that it was as full as it was with mud was that
a piece of wood used to originally form the catch basin had
never been removed and was partially blocking the entrance to
TS /04 /CM9- 1106WP (8- 19 -88)
e w9d shown in utter in hotO #9 . Once this
the outlet pip ( g P )
obstruction was removed, the basin was easily flushed clear
(photo #10). The grate on the east side of the street was also
cleared off. Prior to cleaning, approximately one square foot
of grate was open (photo #2). After clearing the grate, there
is now approximately 4%, square feet of opening for drainage.
While inspecting the interior of the drains with the pipeline
camera (see videotape for details) we noted that generally, the
18" pipe running down to the beach from the westerly catch
basin was in very good condition. We observed what appeared to
be one minor hole in the bottom of the pipe where some water
could be escaping and several small holes along the top of the
pipe. All of these holes can be patched with little difficulty
as the pipe is on the surface at this point. As mentioned
above, however, the lower 5 to 10 feet of the pipe, at the
outlet onto the beach, is in poor shape and should be replaced
in order to direct drain water away from the face of the
vertical bluff. In addition, the four yard drains should be
extended beyond the face of the bluff.
With regard to the drain running under Neptune, it is an arched
CMP culvert approximately 18 inches high and 24 inches wide,
has a very flat grade and appears to be quite deteriorated on
the invert.
As a last item of observation, during our approximately three
hours on site on August 16, the sprinkler system on the slope
above the beach at 1638 Neptune ran the entire time. The slope
is vegetated with ice plant and normally would not need to be
watered. We have no way of knowing how often the slope is
irrigated, but the owners should be made aware of the
unadvisability of applying any more water than is absolutely
necessary to fragile coastal bluffs and slopes.
RECONNENDATIONS .
Items to be done immediately:
1. Perform hydrology study.
2. Perform basin capacity and pipe hydraulic analysis.
3. Repair minor holes in pipe.
4. Replace solid manhole cover on westerly catch basin with a
grated cover to increase capacity of catch basin.
5. Recommend that the property owners redirect the outlet of
their yard drains away from the vertical portion of the
bluff face.
6. Recommend that the property owners reduce or preferably
eliminate slope irrigation.
ISt
�' TS /04 /CM9- 1106WP (8- 19 -88)
Short term items t�be accomplished: •
1. Replace lower portion of drain outletting onto beach
including redesign of pipe support.
2. Provide access via lockable gate to the grate in
property's back yard.
Longterm items to be accomplished:
1. Perform any system improvements indicated by the hydrology
and hydraulic studies.
2. Construct a local depression and curb opening at the
easterly catch basin to increase capacity and provide
self - clearing capability.
3. Replace or reline the drain connecting the two catch
basins in the street.
Attachments:
Ten photos and letter from Arlene Mattioli.
TS /04 /CM9- 1106WP (8- 19 -88)
! „ r A
ARLENE MATTIOLI JUL : E14C
1636 -38 Neptune Avenue
Encinitas, California 92024
(619) 753 -7554 C(i1! OF
DEPT OF P
July 21, 1988
The Honorable Rick Shea
Mayor of Encinitas
527 Encinitas Boulevard
Encinitas, CA 92024
Councilwoman Marjorie Gaines Councilman Gerald Steel
City of Encinitas City of Encinitas
527 Encinitas Boulevard 527 Encinitas Boulevard
Encinitas, CA 92024 Encinitas, CA 92024
Councilwoman Anne Omsted Councilman Greg Luke
City of Encinitas City of Encinitas
527 Encinitas Boulevard 527 Encinitas Boulevard
Encinitas, CA 92024 Encinitas, CA 92024
Dear Mayor Shea and Members of the City Council:
I am writing to ask you for the City's assistance on a drainage problem that exists
in front of and across my lot located at 1636 -38 Neptune Avenue in Encinitas.
My husband and I purchased our residence -at 1636 -38 Neptune Avenue in October
of 1971. We had moved to this area from the Midwest because of my husband's health.
Unfortunately, my husband passed away shortly after we moved to this area, and since
then I have been raising our six children.
To our knowledge, prior to our purchasing our home, a drain pipe was installed
across the lot in 1969. That drain pipe appears to be deteriorating, and my family and I
are very concerned that we could have the type of catastrophic bluff failure from leakage
from the drain pipe that was suffered by the Kuhlman in Solana Beach. As you may be
aware, because of a rupture in a County drainage pipe underneath their home which sits
on the bluff on the North end of Solana Beach, massive erosion took place which exposed
the foundation of the Kuhlman home. Recently a 165 -foot seawall was constructed to
remedy the erosion problem. It is my understanding that that seawall and the associated
backf ill will cost nearly $400,000.
When it rains very hard, the opening to the box culvert drain, which is in the street
immediately in front of our house, cannot handle all of the water, and the water flows
down across my property. We experience this condition at least once or twice a year.
The drainage problem at my home has become progressively worse over the last
few years. Unfortunately, my property is the low point for the Northern end of Neptune
Avenue, Grandview and Avocado Streets, as well as for the parking lot on the North end
of Neptune, adjacent to Sea Bluff. The drainage flows from the North to my property
f� from approximately the 1400 block of Neptune, as well as flowing South to my property
Encinitas City Council
July 21, 1988
Page Two
from the Southern boundary of Sea Bluff. In addition, both Avocado and Grandview
Streets, from their crests, all drain down to my property. The nine condominium
Neptunes Cove development added a large amount of additional runoff water to the drain
in front of my house. It is my understanding that there is a 4 -unit development that is
scheduled to go into the East side of Neptune, which I am sure will also increase the
runoff to and across my property. To the best of my estimation, the drain across my
property is now servicing 55 homesites, over half of which are duplex residences.
Therefore, the amount of water that I receive at my property, and particularly in heavy
rainstorms, is tremendous.
We had a friend of ours, Jim Baldwin, who has done work on our home, contact the
City about our problem. Mr. Baldwin is the contractor who did the work on the Kuhlman
home in Solana Beach. Our property was inspected by a representative from the City,
who appeared to share our concern about the size of the drain opening for the box culvert
in front of my home. It appears to me, as a layperson, that it is not large enough to take
all of the water from the street when we have a downpour.
The City's representative also shared our concern that the pipe going under our
property is old and rusting and needs to be replaced.
I would like to ask that the City take the following steps:
1
1. I would like the pipe under my property repaired or replaced, as appropriate.
There was a suggestion by the representative of the City that the portion of
the pipe that runs down my bluff to the beach be removed, and a concrete
open trough placed in its stead. I think that this would be a very dangerous
approach, since concrete would be very heavy, and I would be most
concerned about it resting on the fragile bluffs. Presently, the corregated
metal pipe that runs down to the beach is buried under the ground and does
not have nearly the weight that the concrete open trough would have. I
have spoken with others who are knowledgeable about such matters, and
they have suggested one of the new supercompound plastic pipes that would
be light, but extremely durable. I do not want to have any elaborate
construction that would disturb or destroy the fragile existing bluff.
2. 1 also would like the City to investigate the possible enlargement of the
existing drain opening for the box culvert. 1 assume that there must be
some substantial problem if, during a downpour, the water flows over the
top of the culvert and down across my property.
3. To investigate the possibility of redirecting some of the runoff to an
alternate drainage site.
As a widow who has had a bit of a struggle raising my six children, I am not in an
economic position to undertake the repairs or the replacement of the drain pipe that runs
across my property. Also, as ha !een pointed out to some of the Councilmembers and
staff by Paul Harlow, the former President of the Seacoast Preservation Association, Inc.,
it would appear that the City must undertake some responsibility for removal of the
Encinitas City Council
July 21, 1988
Page Three
runoff waters along the coast which end up traversing to the beach across private
property. There are few existing storm drains in this coastal area. It is my understanding
that anyone building a new home on the bluff is required to cause drainage to go back
toward the road from the blufftop. It seems unfair that I should have to bear the burden
of accepting so much drainage water runoff across my property without assistance from
any governmental entity, when it is governmental approvals that are permitting the homes
to be built which are increasing the surficial water runoff to my property. An example of
the type of water that I have to accept across my property is that some neighbors to the
North of me on Neptune, who needed a permit to build a spa on their property, had to
show that the water would not run off the bluff. They planned their development of the
spa so that the water would empty onto the street and then run to the drain across my
property. This drainpipe serves the entire surrounding community, and therefore I believe
the cost to maintain it should be shared by the community.
I have brought this matter to the attention of my lawyer, and he suggested that
before any legal steps were considered, I should first contact your Council to request
assistance with this very -- important matter. I would appreciate very much your looking
into the problem as quickly as you can, particularly in light of the fact that by the Fall we
will be back into the rainy season, and the pipe must be replaced immediately. If the
a necessary repair and replacement work is not undertaken at once, I am afraid that we
could suffer the type -of catastrophy that the Kuhlman had in Solana Beach. Since I still
have several children at home whom I am supporting, I cannot possibly afford such a
disaster. I believe that it would be in the best interest of all concerned to resolve this
problem now. It would be much less expensive to simply upgrade the drainage facility,
rather than to have to repair damages which would result from a failure of that facility
(in addition to the upgrading of the drainage facility itself).
At the suggestion of Mr. Bob Warren, the Encinitas City Engineer, I approached
Woodward -Clyde Consultants with a request that they submit a written proposal as to
what would be involved in rectifying the problems outlined in this letter. Unfortunately, I
have been informed by those consultants that the cost of investigating the problems and
coming up with a cost estimate for suggested solution would be in the range of $3,500 to
$4,000. That cost far exceeds my resources. Therefore, I will not be able to hire the
consulting firm to perform this task.
For your further information I am enclosing an information pamphlet about this
problem. I have included the original pamphlet with the letter to Mayor Shea, and have
included copies of the pamphlet to the other Councilmembers and to Messrs. Shafer and
Warren. Thank you very much for your consideration of this request.
Sin erely,
Arlene Mattioli
AM /nk
cc: Mr. Warren Shafer
Mr. Bob Warren
•
February 22, 1988
Histor
We purchased the residence at 1636 -38 Neptune Ave., in Oct. 1971.
To the best of our knowledge the drain pipe was installed in 1969. In 1974
Stuart Resor did a remodel on the house and took the picture that is
enclosed . You can get a clear view of the drain pipe in this picture.
In 1975 1 was forced to put a berm across the front of my driveway, to
stop water from the street washing onto my property when it rained.
Even with the berm, when it rains very hard, the opening to the drain on
the street at the mailbox cannot handle all the water flowing from the
street. I experience this condition at least once or twice a year .
In 1979 Mr. Resor did another remodel on the house. We had moved here
originally for my husbands health, Because we have six children we lived
on both sides of the duplex. Unfortunatlely my husband passed away and
the remodel was to make room to move my parents into my home to help
me and my family.
We always took care so the pipe was not allowed to be damaged and
repainted any bad spots with tar.
• In 1985 at the advice of Mr. Resor, I wrote a letter to a Ms. Kristine
Peitz an attorney in Vista. I was Informed she was handling a case in
1
• • February 22, 1988
Solona Beach where a similar pipe rusted away and caused the bluff to
collapse. (see article enclosed) With out my knowledge she left town and
someone else took over the case .
After the bad storm in Jan. 1988, the drain pipe was damaged at the
bottom of the stairs and appeared to have collapsed. On Feb. 4, 1988 1
called my attorney, Mr. Don Mitchell of Encinitas to contact the city for
me and have them come out to inspect the pipe for any leaks due to
corrosion and old age. He said he would do so, but requested any
information I could give him about the pipe.
On Feb. 17, 1988 1 called Jim Baldwin a contractor to have someone
clear the pipe of iceplant so I could get some pictures for my attorney. On
Feb. 19, 1988 they cleared the pipe and found it was hanging so the end was
on the ground. At my own expense I had the workmen raise up the pipe and
brace it so the water would flow freely from the pipe. However , now
when water passes through the pipe it leaks from underneath in about four
or five places because it is rusted out. It is easy to assume that if It is
rusted and leaking at this point where we can see it, that it very well may
be rusted out and leaking any where up above, along it's path from the
street to the beach
When I first moved here in 1971 the street had only a few homes in the
2
Fcbrunry 22, 1988
area. Today there are only one or two lots left to be developed, creating a
larger amount of water to runoff than before.
When it rains the drain on the street services a large area. Water runs
from the north on Neptune Ave for about one block. It also travels about
two blocks from the south on Neptune Ave. Because both Grandview St.
and Avacado St. which run east and west are hilly streets that run to
Neptune Ave., all the rain water or any runoff water from these streets
run to the drain in question.
One day about two years ago, I was working in my yard and two men
were inspecting the drain. One Man lifted the manhole cover and looked
into the sewer. I asked him why he was doing that? He replied, he was the
developer for Neptune's Cove and before he could get a permit to build his
nine condo's, he had to show that there would be proper drainage for any
runoff from his property. They did get their permit to build and all the
runoff from that development does flow to the drain we are dicussing.
A similar case is a neighbor to the north at 1662 Neptune Ave. who needed
a permit to build a spa on their property had to show the water would not
run off the bluff. He planned it so the water would empty into the street
and run to the drain in question. You can see that this drain services the
3
February 22, 1988
surrounding streets and the community and construction permits were
given because of this drains existence. It is the only drain of it's kind in
the area servicing 55 home sites, over half of which are duplex
residences.
I made inquires and found out that the life expectancy of such a drain
pipe is 15 years. This pipe is 19 years old.
Presently I rent out one side of my duplex. I derive about half of my
income from this rental. Lack of proper maintenance to this pipe could
cause a similar slide as in the one in Solona Beach I could loose my
property as well as my tenant.
I still have several children at home to support, and cannot afford such
a disaster. It would create a serious hardship for both myself and my
family. Your prompt attention to this matter is therefore extremely
important.
Sincerely,
Arlene Mattioli
•
4
f
r gyp. � �} 1 . ✓ � � : I }+ ., A �..
r
1
l
ti `y i
1
F
h -
- phi
t •�.C. .t� f � � .y� �j'
AM
w IW,
I
1 �
s
r
i
,J I �►
t
I
f
On the east side of • Ave there d rain
connects to aDiDe that is under the street. This same drain connects to the
PiDe that runs down my bluff. T also wonder what condition the iiDe under
the street is in as it is older that anyone around here can remembe
OF NEPTOAJE AVE,
- ,� f �, ""7• r st.
y J i
r
_.•� —
a ...........
r �, 1
r •, 11 J
f
< .E
I
�w.
OWT
lobe
_ ' 1 Al
'Y 1
. c
W47
'T
- - - - -- - - -- --
7 fu �
�GL 1 Aj C-
A - T E P P i AJ 5
z
I
- --•ate .,,_ ��,,^�
• � ice..
AVACA DO -S I
ti
Ii i C
1w P"4
r
7
S
11
•
k9 A rt ,� c o tir S F to tit T`9
r
Q. X11
C ,
1 t ' f�
1
J I
I
6 2,4T E G` PEgiIVC—
To P
1
�F
l�
�5
i�.
i�
i}
;
i
z
4 i�
•
rA
c U'��L j L t P�
L
/J 7 -
•
� o�
FT
G
C9
Cl
21, 1�,9 ATEP,
T _ o c
c
1rvAT�P .A�� C.
CKS SO o ,u, �j £P Tv
o P PoAk oT+�-
C- Ie,A IJ U t uJ -j- A U A C A �
'Erosion a
I! AW
clef flianger
for residents
Homeowners see
disaster inching
nearer to them
By Laura Kaufman,
Writer
r,
SOLANA BEACH — Winter
storms that pummel the beach and `•, ` ,
send rainwater streaming off cliffs
have left an eroding legacy here. �� '�, .> 't" ,�
At the north end of the city, for
example, a house clings to the edge •�� -, 1�` .�.', n•
of a crumbling cliff just above Car-
diff State Beach
And owners of property for more
than a mile on either side of the �ti t •' 4
house in recent months have asked
the City Council for permission to
protect their own homes from
Mother Nature, who has been nib-
bling away at the bluffs and their ` k~
sense of security.
" People are desperate, said
Councilwoman Celine Olson, point-
ing to plastic drainpipes hanging
like streamers from the Wp'6f the !; / e. c ' '• ",
bluffs. "They're trying anything
right now to protect their proper-
g P P Pe
ty ,,
Within a month, Joseph Stein-
berg and Lisa and Fred Kuhlman, T�
owners of the Circle Drive proper-
ty threatened by erosion, should
begin construction of a 165 -foot- E
long sea wall to protect their
homes. y ��
•�,` ` 'x
The project also will include ex- , , .
tensive work on the blufftop, using V �71
earth reinforced with plastic strips, �..
according to Louis Lee, an engineer
with the consultants Woodward and The San Diego Union /Charlie Neuman
Clyde. In Solana Beach, the clifftop home of Lisa rate of erosion was six Inches a year be-
The project is expected to cost and Fred Kuhlman is threatened by winter fore riprap was deposited at the base of
about $M,000. storm erosion. One engineer estimated the' the cliff.
Both the Kuhlman and Joseph
Steinberg separately have sued the Steinberg's swimming pool and and the way the foundation is set their living room windows are
county for damages caused after a yard are in danger of sliding to the up, even though it doesn't look boarded up. The erosion around
i drain i e r_u et ture e d in December of Bch, but a reinforced concrete stable, it's on a solid foundation," their home has made the Kuhlmann
at sent - t W ater cascading foundation originally built on the Muir said. "very nervous," Lee said.
over the cliff. The water caused ex- Kuhlman property has thus far pre But, Muir added, "if the bluff It took six years for the Kuhl -
tensive erosion and brought the vented the house from sliding down recedes another two or three feet, mans and Steinberg to obtain per -
Kuhlman's house perilously close the cliff. they'll loge the living room." mite for the Project, Lee said They
to the edge, according to architect "When Fred designed the house, The Kuhlman are living in the
Lynn Muir. he had visions of this occurring, back portion of their house and See Cliffs on Page 4
�c� C=� Q• t ►
U. OAJ 10 l
i
fs . C a growin wQ ,�I
g ,"Yt mener
° P 4.
d his data roved IAft has »hest b�etteoi f1is. Y 11 �i11ed s� R
In a eeapk of—eases h " between oee -haU "hwh ad six wvea a�t�ta' en we
)meowaecs hired the' the !fir orgh;iYelr
name firm . inches of erion a year at the base os roarna'darMg eiolent wh>ter storms. ��• eases folbwr
Bey had Lir6d 15 *ft earllet; 'the elft- throughout the county. So
.: me AWOParty, owners have coo -.' ;.., *ayor ftosmie
yes. who .said,. "No. obl In -Solana Beach, he CH hove. afructed sea wall, some of which are laid the January, storm however
Pr , O -you - h amrary storms blew out
on't need a sea watt. ,Xoa'll never „ eroded ropYo. one inch a year, he said. tq feet away from property Beet, ' Windows in homes where sea walls
ied a sea wall." However;'in front of pt Ndkbun :' Rowever, activists contead the were built beyond the five fimik
Lee said h firm was one'o those - ' Prope tyt I" measured .kbe' at walla lt[estrlct public access to the Delaney enpports the idea of al-
ho did the preliminary engineering • 3aches a year before ripnp was beacb; :'and they have succeeded in ,lowing sea walls up to 15 feet away
udies for some blufftop plans. He ' deposited at the base of the cliff in getting an initiative on the April 12 . from property lines, with a
called Mat at the time be advised early 1993• ballok The activists want to limit sea 'handy
walkway" clearly marring public ac-
ving eroding bk& walls to five
anty officials that it was safe to Problems invol "feet
did near sea caves. have not been limited to Sdana bey ond the �o-
"We really didn't have information Beach.
to bow fast sea caves enlarge and In November, the City Council in
llapse," Lee said. "There was no Encinitas decided to prohibit build -
non to believe it was going to col- ings frorp being constructed any
Closer than'40 feet from the edge of a
'But 10 years after the structure -bluff.
is built, the sea cave - collapsed and •, Fuller , °of the planning depart -'
dangered •the structure. -At that -meat . believes anything less than a
3e we went back and said it need- •40 -foot setback would be unrealistic
a sea wall," Lee said. "If there is a major earthquake
Lee said previous studies were along the Rose Canyon Fault ...
;ed on scientific data available at there could be a lot of damage
fie' throughout the county," be said.
'In the 1980s, there. wasn't very "We're within two or three miles of
:ch information published to eval- the fault, and anything that close to
.e and determine erasion rates," any rind of bluff is going to be a
said. "There were boom at the problem."
ie that .looked relatively stable. Del Afar, megnwhile, is has its own
. opinion was, in most : ems, that battle brewing over beachfront pro-
ias not a problem. •. , . , • •
.ee said his firm has been measut- W66 oy the city's shoreline Is flat,
cliff erosion for more than a dec- ' AM bachfront property owners
i �
FEB I
-Z JIL
,� �;
i
_. I —!;.%� e �
1
,;
;.
��
Q ; ,���
�• G.S o�� � �1 `1 s `� 1
les
WE F1 �.EaY CFRTIFY THU � � ��
' AIL BE A TRUE Aril! > G RECT
ORIGINII° C TF ER �.3 ', I� 'v`V IN FULL
FORCE AND EFF,�: e .
DATED a g
1 GIBSON, DUNN S CRUTCHER 'Trust Se of AI • cap j ° I L ED
GORDON A. SCHALLER .0 tt� RIVERSIDE COUNTM
2 TIMOTHY J. KAY BY_
800 Newport Center Drive RI?ED IGNATURE —�AR 2 2 �gg
3 Suite 700
4
Newport Beach, California 92660
WILLIAM L a�eeLr, a.ft
sr
(714 ) 759 -3800 0. L
5 Deputy
Attorneys for Petitioner
6
7
8
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9
FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
10
11
In the Matter of the ) N0. 5fj2 3 5
12
13 JOSEPH INTER VIVOS TRUST U /D /T ) ORDER WAIVING NOTICE OF
DATED MARCH 9, 1982, as amended. ) HEARING; ACCEPTING
14 ) RESIGNATION OF TRUSTEE;
APPOINTING SUCCESSOR
15 ) TRUSTEE AND TEMPORARY
TRUSTEE; AND INSTRUCTING
16 ) THE TRUSTEES CONCERNING
DISTRIBUTION
17 )
(Cal. Prob. Code SS 17200,
18 ) 15640, 15660, 17206, 15644,
15602)
19 )
20 The "Petition for Ex Parte Order Waiving Notice of
21 Hearing; Accepting Resignation of Trustee; Appointing Successor
22 Trustee and Temporary Trustee; Waiver of Bond; and Instructing the
23 Trustees Concerning Distribution (Cal. Prob. Code SS 17200, 15640,
24 15660, 17206, 15644, 15602)" filed by JANET JOSEPH FELL, a person
25 interested in the above - entitled Trust, was heard on 3 2 ,
26 1988 at 8• /S / a.m. in Department 2 of the above - entitled Court, the
27 Honorable William H. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Petitioner
28 1 appeared by her attorneys of record, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, by
r... w s owun
s 4
rip a �. •
i
2334 85 343860
/ Recorded Rsquest Of R�cof:nen n+
FIOELITT RATIONAL TITLE I crfli.InL REf.�iln5
_ A,q wren acw"o uAAro Of SAN CItGO CGUS Y. LA
— r Steven Bryant 1395 SFP I8 .Im 3 50 RF
Ill— 1355 Summit Ave. AR
— Cardiff, CA 92024 VERAL
L LYLF COUNTY RECURDERJ TLR
pets T T ` SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR All ENURDER S U
LONG FORM DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENTS OF RENTS
THIS FORM FURNISHED BY OLD TOWN TITLE COMPANY, INC.
pp I
one Of A.
I Thls Doeu of Trust, made this 13th day of Scptetcbcr 1985 , between
1
ARLDE E C. M4ITIOLI
f , herein called TRU£TOR,
whose addre •s ib36 tI0ptune Ave., Loucadia, C4 92024 �I
(number and street) (cilyI I lqua Izlpl
OLD TOWN TITLE COMPANY, INC., a California Corporation, l`ereln called TRUSTEE, and
STEVEN BPYA•dFr, r•N UDP'V{ MM MAN I •
i
,herein celled BEN6r ^,IARV, �
I
Wlt:lesseth: That Truslor IRREVOCABLY GRANT$, TRAN3FF.RSANO ASSIGNS TO TRUSIE IN TRUST, WITH POWER OF£ALE,
that property Ire SAN Diwo County, California, described as: I
j \ That portion of Wt 2 in the torthe.tot Quarter of Section 5, Twmship 13 South,
V Ranne 4 West, San Bernardino Bare xnd Meridian, accortlinq to official plat
thercof ....... rinre particularly described in exhibit 'a' 41 ttactled hereto and
mule it part hereof.
I
ACCOMMODATION FILING
I �
3 I
TWIT --, renb,asuesAnd profits thereof,$uaxoT. to therlpht.pom—ndautMrlry Mralnaaar away to Ord oonkrred Upon L
aenehr,Iary to collect and apply such rents, issues and profile.
For the Purpose of Sscurinp: ant npn p1eMe _ I
1. Perfa man" of each agreement of Tnn herein ln contained. 3. Payment of , U'JU. as •vldenced exa We P by Tr or y h In Of a r o
data h errwlm, and any "h"u Lon of reraw•al thereof, In the principal sum of S 1 U JU UU
Beneficiary o/ order. 3. POy—nt of such further sums a the than record prMt of as id property Mrgt{a. may DOrtdw Iron BOMllclary
widenoW by Ordinal note lot Whirl) reolllr 1 II N W seduced. f
To Protect the Sareurly of Thls Deed of Trust, Trustor Agrees:
rlTa.«a.aw lm •ewsW m. enw, •w�.o+..,aa,.•�e.•r«„ww•.nu�w�a 11+.«,,.wmw�•1•ww.la. wr•r+v:wwpmWwn„rw•.rw..n►►*•w ., ' t �'
.,, wr,.+ ro-ew.,, w: w.,,.•, robaau •a./e.,w.wroar.^•ea•..0 <a..,•IO, aaawrlw„•.au,a +a w,•+w,.anw.m,. w<o-wr.,w.. .w,wna�.ti 'y 4 '
, e r a�x•rw.. w rw•..a ar, w o-.•.e. ne•wn:ra w a,Tm. a o -,,.«..m n,. w w,•++n. wit r ewmn mr.nww^nerw.••rw
a,w.r. 1.,•aa.. n,•„w.w. awo- w ao M am •<n .nosh eew w <Iwra:nw r.w a,.w wevv m•r o-,M,ar,.at• r•<..arr. w.o•<,rs re•r.•ru•ra r.,.w not •.auWq ew �
ww•+
A Te r•wM.,..www •+s ar..waw..w11 r/.rsl.w le �wwrw.sa> waerw�• air, w�wv�e +.i,•.:,wa•omr«awwn,l,•,.a
Mare r nn a•rasa.r •�e<. ti ae•e,•aer M eae a•,ae i r .
M V wY•w/ w lruwr. aMn •epaaw• r ,••w. ena,y •aw r M• w Mwe r „Oita M •ar/r rwwrr r •w•eww w •a ew swwra 1
MI. Mrs/ w w •,rnaw, ••/w w/ •e•Y'sa•.r•�MYA•rM.•w,n••'M••rr M•Mwr M/r•MMMYr1 wh,nlM W YeMYM.e W M•r'•� /• 1
W a •..•rr• a nos W •ar• wen r • .rrrsr Y. w Ora wM,eee/ r eMMV'a N M•aa arrow, Y TnenMeaa MF•w. W w M M any/ M Oraerv, M
Ieww� /a IsM
MI Te sal r e•r,r, Aa•a s••re Mr!/1MY•M W M/,�,wYae•wwa• Me/•M•aaW w/ �Me. w• Marrw ,M+w.,•,Mtr,wMaaw/,PMM•MMraM
W •w,•, aw, n,rw4 w wen rMa't w aq sea aa./a Oahe /FFMn M w Fnr w a/wrw e.w M •Ora M W aMaMel w n TML
arew Tewv Mw, wM^••aw we /wq�•aM•Mew,MM.M1•a•+MM•Mwf„aMa Mewra/Myew•a1eMW.M/MaMAYwawM,a •0 �+•
I I rww,,,wwMaaTnas FawM•MM+^Mw•,.,e./..W weeMti,,,•w•uan,w•nw WYwMnw „•ewMr„w1.4wn•/t�/YMI/1••1 /,•wwn11' , h
T„Mwlw�aww,w•rw,er•1e.WMe••M1Y•W WPr•aMe•ww W64M r�I ��snra.e/••w^eMWlwaMars, w•w•Ie MMrwM . L
awo-wnr TN,••. W. Fr, rw•.• e„ wra, M„�e,/y•,,,N.,,•,•,•a•.•I•araaw eM SaMnwMW/MaM•,Ir +MMwOM/Irw Mnw M/M I cli A co I ;
wen a•.re M rawrr tiros r,aw w.•r W Far M ,•••ar,r ar (�
flat. F/r rn••sa•ay W are,ra ar„ra�l wwe McMMa MawwMryerf „sYLalaalYMlaaa•YlMrsaw- ealMwwaaaMeeMYrw i' -
rMwMr r wr wrrMa lMMalr er awwaarr•rwM erM Ma•,w,T,ewMMMMMMaalMatr M •a•MaeMwMMaFFa eaMaMr /MM as O�
rra,w• w.,...w ,, r •nrwr•sa,aaMaa
_- _ . riY�. %..w.L_ -.- _ . _._-• 4 —” 1�
fi Ai;
a
g
p1TM r,/awn,aerrliw Nwwraaw wN a. rarN. rnr,/, Mrrdw }rryrWara/arl/wrry/MYwrwY rPy/.drrrawYerrrrllllrr/rM
art war a nrr wen «orr/r naaw0 A r«a N M rH rwr W rw H w wrrw r aaow aw.rr 4 wrowl+r w waawr d aw w w+r Nyrrr
(IITMAvaw rq rr/«r,eawl Hnwwraalr, rA wrYrwrreWerYMa+ MrM11YMIMw ,rdM.p.^MM'rnd.wwMMMMrwrrw.wlwr I ,.
Yaolrrn Mnwl rw ,nx.•n r b yw. .
M iTrl w wry r.n. w nwr INr bYrr. M+raarrlT HMw W rrwtMM.ran Yrrw raps d�wW WT W wwrlYlb.dbY bM W W nerM Wdw4 W
wYwlalslwHPrwrllM MdwY Yrrs nlwarw^.'IdHNO.OMlyrrwnE ��nww� MdNwP MM. awwrlbHH..9drMriWa/Id
HM,Fw N ww. w wy r , y , rr d HrwnrpNN/Trrrnbr aanwwerawr
Ih TM. u0rn wrbn rwur +d earrncwY wrMrd r wraez.al+aMrwrwwr . ryNrNwraMraMrOar W W narYTnrYa4rrrwwrr W,awdwr:l
ww,ocrHnla+. r,rnr� Nr«�.mrrY.rrocw wrrM'.HwaOrnl am W w«« r. rn., swY« wa, ww�wweawrrnaw •wrcl.rre.marwaeaaH
r,Y,rNaw+wW TN Orww N W, �.rwoAar,w aw rOwwH/ Y'M/wwn a Prw. «YwYMMwO tlw.b.' /M YW� a1r YNwlwa wd, M /nwrww^p. Tn�w H/
wa <, W rvr rd aw Dwa Iwilrrr enwra N rnrn rgrr
b nrN awnA
(iq TMwwe «rrl wcNw.TMrnr.bl lnwroWw„yy yq ,y,wayry Hrlar,lV,rwWM+ww.HNOHOMNwsa..r Trvrr.bw+rdH Yw,rW ..
n a W waw'n. rrr.w NNO rNrw H nTl aM b M rlwa q Trvaa «pav«wl�rM NOrlra rcw.n lw.w' a N Trw^'r'a a wN rytirw:lwarra• b
Aron WarenbrM w[mrMWra,aarr.110an rr, r+w e nrneN woewrwrr N/rr^.Aawr.a Aarwwr
W r«wlww wr,a.HlwrrrW Nrnr row+I br Mlrorlwrw lwrA rwww rnr ,roy,ry yrr wrrrbnarbwwanlwrrywnawan
bM fw,.yrww ww.rr arallr4 NNWaq rowprrlr« WUr, prb, WwpTHrw. rr eo♦u rnerrwnr♦r e•yyra
nrawrrrwwM '.rrr+.yrny♦,«prywyrwcwMlar.W NwCnwwrwbrw,wrry,nrYwwn+w TMrnyrw.row,WMwprrrlwN araarrry. aAYdrnd I I i
a,wMb.iwrw<wvIIWHWawn,n erMwlwrrr. rra wl w^wrrnr w,aNw +wnar.arrw ww,nerwbnw.4 w/ aa wn MNd +bwNmOa ,�
.rr.l ar.nr r «Wv«r+r r .w ^�++r. r•""ry H Iw.w
I[� Twr w w, au,.+ A T+.rw « a w Inw.rw+r I ,
T w.w nWn .. wye,.w..rrbTry.rw ��w.w�e a o.�.n :Iw Trw�..: a.:w «.ww a «.: a �. W N. a r�wna we d*.w. iw+r. M•a+m
I an.•w. Yrra..wwr.. Hr Hne.,. owc nww« wwroH, arrwna. wn .nwar«n....nww.ww.l+w�awnr+nrww w.rawr..Tn.l...w�we
arn.n+wrwNw.ww wr• w wrrlr w+ «rwrc.yarr.w,wrrawyw «reaa.wrwy.W «wcnaerweHr� ayen
I I . H ns[ra wwr w w «wna.ww a Hwr ara+./.r•araiNy rr Trwr. a ,nnwy rya aa.m w nr,awa wawUA /.wN y
ry p.wa r.W Iwn ww r wr zwrnr nry w. row. wM..y w r �a«w..r.n+•+nw. , w.nw A «.wwnw wNeww Tnwwwwaw lawn wrawr r
-Y /rM ynwwrpHr•ww,rW.wirwwA wry rerYr,nw.wrwF.wW+�rY.N"IN'Snw. WwY wwa «rn «.w"errnrr
. w � w , r , r , y «. Myrna tryrw, TrMw. w y.„yirrry r rwwrw
_ _ wwrwr.«rrla w
wwn.«awmrr. yrrWrrrrratnrr Wwavrtyw. wNrN wrawrnrwrr rrlra rl. arnrrw War �nan �.IraHn«arWr.a
rw.. ♦.,rbw�w. Hwr.lw.a. wl z -r wa rr ...«wwaHww.....wwYr«
rq, n yrrw rwA wwre +rrNa.
. I Mrrsrn.wrrr r ,rww «w.wwro aan rewrbw re.na wrA rut oar rw yyw.Yr wrw•rzNwn«I. Her aHwww rswn..w`.w.w I
i ti,w„ w „n,w..a. rraw A H s..aww W arti wnorr.a♦/ W ,.wrc.a N H to wwawwww•wawarow wlNa
�.wwra. �ra�a� www wwrwnw.a.rw «m.wr Tn,n..wr w.. wna•wnnwmw«. I
rwu«H,wnra Hargw�TrvrY♦.TrvNwWe♦rwwrn nrrM,rrr,Manr. W/rarwwaarlrwriwr,Yr+W i
i li]IrM nw Gr sa•n.a..,urw Harnrrr w, WMrwarM, yyy. yy „,w,a.ya♦�r.rwrnr.wr,nwl•aoy. r.awwa.rraarn Warwr Tnr wr trwwry
rn w++ W nrr-r wyanq o�wa�•. a s. w w.ww«w.e.. wwn« a,w,wn.s r errsw lw«n �n.w n..a. wwww H.wwn b..awr. H «rww+
� M 'wnw♦. aww ,w,w. W H rrq.w a«Mr HYrw M pyrd I f
twat rwR yewOrwo.r.eAM.TnAwrMaaawrabwdr rM wnY nrard I MI/
lial Tlw Tra w,rwOw br Trua am Nr aaa. NN r♦rwrl W tl�Y+ • yrlcrry w T,urr ry+ r r WM Nwr MwM+ A Tna.r
arn+w rY w,ar r♦n arrr Lwa a Typ w a rrr wan w rroewl In ^'
1M wMwrYr.n Tnrw rNrrr ar .rout
wrr/rNae NOarr/IW dwr l.waMy wwnrrwrnrwsrniwdlr wow wwraw. wr brw
I Signature of Trustor
1 ' -
CA t �� >.
F «* ” " I .-W TICOR TITLE INSURANCE i
t r° l N
CA 21 ICI y
+ ' i IllndiviJuall �I
' 1 1 J
S'I A7't.()1 (.: \I 11:oKNIA
alunrr or ---.SD rwhh< in anJ Inr i t a
t,�ber 11, 1985 h urc me ersigned. a Nn .y
I On A c c f . mt the t l2
nd
aald su[ p-1-11Y -afar d - - - -� �—
_ , r�lwmot9oo�o` I ( I
I nv
i preJ [n me n [hi basis o (sa[ISlac[u y evidence [°be (�f Flr'.i Al `; '�?°°9 y 1
[he _ «hose name is s b e 1 d [° the 1 HCLFF! E ICOfOgp' I ,
erw a knowledged hat SYI� cX9. p .� • Il°iAGY VVCIP C \lARp1A
C
.Rhin in+vrr iem nd ac . t
` 1 .l m1 o¢ro en rt' _l
1 7 <meJ [h<aame. r I• a o1re aPrt 771 I i �
WITNESS my pppan
p d +nJ uffcialy�+t. ,�..,,..,.t >o —.....
I
Signal. ^� (Thr uer la M(W., rourW —
I"
FOR REOONVEyANCE OR FORECLOSURE SEND TO THE OFFICE M i
OL F D TOWN TfTlf COM
REQUEST PANY INC.
OR FULL�EMO���ANCE 1
N rrr rb art
I 2 To OLD TOWN TRLE COMPANY: MC. TRUSTEL"
�� �� 4
O
ro.
O eu
F• I A zluz+ nu a
CI G i ? c Cri 1
00 1 r
A 04
Mn11rwYMral rY bMrTYr[ "Otl ■M
♦. eH Ynrl r r+ralr r H Tnwr 4 arrNYYr aarws rawrsrwr ���J
.UY. �•
r 1
I
.1 �� � r r•. I f
r .I , A I
i
2386 {
.`
�TNE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS l3 POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE LLOWS OF
1 CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND iS DESCRIBED AS .FOLLOWS
THE SOUTHERLY 50.00 FECT OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND
.I
TaIAT PORTION OF LOT 2 IN THE NORTHEAST OUARTER OF SECTION 50
AND
ACCCORDINGI TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF DE SCRIBEDN AS B ASE
FOLLOWS'
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF NEPTUNE AVENUE
AS SAID - , , F.NuE IS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 2078 OF THE SOUTH COAST
PARK ND. rj' FILED NOVEMBER 21r 1927 IN THE OFFICE OF:000NTY
'. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DISTANT THEREON NORTH
RECORDI :F WESTERLY T. 4EST 229. FEET FROM A POINT OF INTERSECT101t OF THE WESTERLY SAID
PRJLOIIGA'ION OF THE CENTER LINE OF GRANDVIEW STREE
wES1ERLY LINE OF NEPTUNE AVENUE, AS SAID STREETS ARE SHOWN
SAID MAP NO. 2078, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING FURTHER IMAM IF T
AS TIDE MUST E�ASIERL` CORNER OF LAND DESCRIB ED SEPTEMBER 23MARGUERIE
H. GIL%ERT, DATED S'.PTEMBER 10, 1942 E I�
1942 IN 1300K 1393, PAGE 399 0 1 F OFFICIAL RECOR OESSAID COUNTY'
TrIENCE SDU1H 70 °.3'15
LI OF SAID GI TONDTIIEDCOUNOIYNOFOSANHDIEGO .ERLY
DATED JAN'1ARY 10, 1970 AND RECCRDED IN BOOK 1131. PAGE 25
07 DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTYI THENCE -,OUIH 16 °59'40" EAST
273.34 FEE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO A POINT (HENCE SOUTH
21 °06'45" EAST 76.94 FEET TO THE IIMOST EESTERLY CORN OF L 1934
DESCRIBEO IN DEED TO HERBERT R.
RECOI+DED MAY 11, 1934 IN BOJK 290, PAGE 315 OF CFF IC JAL RECORDS
OF S /'ID :OuNlYl THE(ICE NORTH 70 °33 EAST 203.08 FEET MORE
OR LESS ALONG THE NORIHERLY LINE OF SA NAIL. LAND TO A POINT
ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF NEPTUNE AVENUE ( THENCE 14011 19 °26'
WEST 350 FEET MORE OR LESS PI-ONO SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE 0
INITHEOOFFICENOFNCOINTYPRECORDERDOFF SAN RDIEGOAC UNTY,1,1jULYFILED
I
I 24, 1944.
I
T 1
I O 1
II co
W CO '
y � IiA
wM1MMN \r
p '��� Nu "w. .+I, �.w w."✓Mr M..wlq MIiM,°wwwM°"°,\ y „II
cz
.eN �,.r
b' ..r
, .M ✓\ wr.•\w°•`w Ml,r. ..!\\n.w°T"rww {,
I..N w".4•'O'• ar..wwnlraw l,.le\°\ wr,�w! ,..w.M i C '.
,•ISep.Iw ww'I M°lwd. ,.rl. elr.! Mr.w\Y�M ,l.r.\w+
{ ` w,«.. ww M....,.M.,r ►.w.°, llni,w\wil'Nw°'. •r°M� � ° e l � '.
° w+ •.� °�rvw �w7w.Mw ^I+..1' aN...•t •°..w �� ww.ri.P"•Mrwww M.w.r °I4N� �1l.w.M wwMMy.^ r , �
4 \.+' w °Y '",,, ! \ r... �,°•`M w�^, °...l rM..wVwr, �� � .wnr`
- --
�
,..! w re • w,w, I1
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THIS DOCUMENT TO
•- --a M A TRUE ANN CeRRECT COPY OF THE
_
W IGINAL THEREON, AND IS NOW IN FULL
• • ~ ' ` V E FORCE AND§ ',� G
DATED It 2
MAY 10 U OF TRUST Trust Seryk9l °£ erica, Inc.
vMWAW
t BY- "JOSEPH FAMILY TRUST" I7Eb SWGNATURE
ROBERT K. JOSEPH, hereinafter called "Trustee," declares
that ROBERT H. JOSEPH and MARY L. JOSEPH, herein called "Trustors,"
or separately as "husband" or "wife," have designated or have
stated that they will designate, the Trustee as a beneficiary
under certain policies of insurance upon both their lives,
described in Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
All property now or hereafter subject to this :rust,
including proceeds of insurance as and when received by the
Trustee, shall constitute the "trust estate."
It is the Trustors' intention that all community property
transferred to this trust and the proceeds thereof, hereinafter
called the " community estate," and teat all quasi - community and
separate property of either Trustor transferred to this trust and
the proceeds thereof, hereinafter called the "separate estate,"
shall retain its character as community, quasi- community or
separate property, respectively, during their joint lifetimes,
subject, however, to all the terms and conditions of this instrument.
The Trustee shall hold, administer, and distribute the trust -
estate in the following manner:
ARTICLE I
PROVISIONS RELATING TO POLICIES
OF LIFE INSURANCE
The rights, powers and obligations of the Trustee and of
the owner of any life insurance policy payable to any trust
created hereunder shall be as follows:
r
to the trust or the withdrawal of said property shall not effect
the nature of the property as cc. =unity unity or otherwise.
2. During the lifetime of both Trustors, the Trustors by
written instrument filed with t:ie Tru3tee, may alter or divest
the interest of or change the beneficiaries, and, with the Trustees
written consent, may amend this trust without limitation in any
other respect. Amendments may be cancelled or amended in like
manner.
3. From and after the death of the predeceased spouse, the
surviving spouse shall have the power to alter, amend or revoke
Trust A in whole or in part, but Trust H may not be altered, amended
or revoked by any person. From and after the death of the sur.
vivinq spouse, Trust A may not be altered, ascended or revoked by
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THIS DOCUMENT TO
any p erson. RE A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE
ORIGINAL THEREOF, AND IS NOW IN FULL
ARTICLE IV FORCE AND EFFECT. p
DATED
POWERS OF THE TRUSTEE Trust Se '418 f erica, Inc.
To carry out the purposes of any trust crii� I
E
instrument and subject to any limitations stated elsewhere in
this Declaration of Trust, the Trustee is vested with the followinq
powers with respect to the trust estate and any part of it, in
addition to those powers now ox hereafter conferred by law: .•
1. To manage, control, sell, convey, exchange, partition,
divide, subdivide, improve, repair; to grant options and to sell
urpon deferred payn.ents; to lease for terms within or extending
beyond the duration of this trust for any purpose including
exploration for and removal of gas, oil, or other minerals; to
enter into community oil leases.
1�.
WE i5 N E. ;Y 6`,.? ?'fit ' 'T " W W-tNEIST TO
CF THE
O A IS NOW IN FULL
- FO MP AND Ek�FELT.
• DATED
2. To retain property, includingTtb Africa, Inc.
`��`` ��s tee
BY
Dank, and invest and reinvest as provided by _ Ii tt tirta
existing, including investments in any cor=on trust fund now or
hereafter established by the Trustee; provided, however, that
unproductive or underproductive property shall not be held as an
asset of Trust A for more than a reasonable time during the lifetime
of the surviving spouse without his consent.
3. To borrow; to place, replace, renew or extend any
encumbrance upon any rftal property; to institute, compromise, and
defend actions and proceedings.
4. To participate in voting trusts, pooling agree-
ments, foreclosures, reorganizations, consolidations, mergers and
liquidations and in connection therewith, to deposit securities
with and transfer title and delegate discretions to any protective
or other committee as Trustee may deem advisable.
S. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this
instrument, the determination of: all matters with respect to what
is principal and income of the, trust estate and the appointment
and allocation of receipts and expenses between these accounts
shall be governed by the provisions of the California Principal
and Income Law from time time existing. Any Such matter not •'
Provided for either in this instrumtat or in the Principal and Income
Law shall be determined by the Trustee in the Trustee's discretion.
6. The enumeration of certain powers of the Trustee
not li-Mit its general powers, the Trustee, subject always
�`' �h�• discharge of its fiduciary obligations, being vested with
il.t all the rights, powers and. privileges which an absolute
f� •
..he same property would. haven,.
compensation and other expenses incurred in the administration
or protection of this trust. This discretion imay be exercised
not only in the interest of the crust estate, but for the benefit
of any Beneficiary. The income remaining after such expenditures
as the Trustee shall elect to pay therefrom shall constitute net
income. The provisions of this Paragraph shall not apply to
Trust A.
B. These trusts have been accepted by the Trustee in the
State o: California, and unless otherwise provided in this
instrumant, their validity, construction and all the rights under
them shall be governed by the laws.of that state.
9. if any provision of this instrument is unenforceable,
the remaining provisions shall nevertheless be carried into effect.
10. As used in this instrument, the term "issue" shall refer
to lineal decendents of all degrees, and shall include afterborn
and adopted persons.
11. As used in this instrument, the masculine, feminine, or
neuter gender, and the singular or plural number shall each be
allowed to include the others when the context so indicates.
EXECUTED in triplicate at Riverside, California on
'•: - 1972. -
TRUSTEE:
R03ERT H. JOSEPH. ;
WE HEREBYkGERTIFY THIS DOCUMENT TO
BE A TRUE ANL' CORRECT COPY OF THE
ORIGINAL THEREOF, AND IS NOW IN FULL
FORCE AND EFFECT.
DATED
Trus eraca, Inc. BY__
� IGNATURE
Boom
on 07
rise
NUM i
} � AND WHEN RECD ED MAIL TO DEC 2 O O,/yl A 177
asrt r "fa r.1 P. "yers DFffdAC O W /�
.Dean., l. 1630 ::c; tune AV Will DW DDIDIry MR
t rr 0 eucadir., CA 7224
KW F. BLOB
sr, L
Title Order No. Escrow \o,315143 -4
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECO RDER'S USE
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX S 4 W7tle—
COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED.
OR COMPUTED UN FULL VALUE LESS LIENS AND
EN M ANCE R AINING AT TIME OF SALE.
,Vj e we oror De«Aw 1— wA.i
Grant Deed
kPol?
FOR A VALUABLE COVSIDERA710\, receipt of which i% hereby acknowledged,
MARY 1'. ' ^'FRS A `IAPPTFI) C0`tAN'' -
hereby GRANT(S) to
MAPY r. M AN 1'`. ".1RrIFn
the following described real property in the
county of SA'1 DTECO state of California:
• AS PEP. LFCAT DESCRTPT10': ATTACHED
Dated A' ; ust 1 1 t
WARY 11. `. FP.e
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
San Die } SS.
covNTT of o �
On December 12 1977 before me, the under.
slpted, • Notary Public in and for said County sad State, personal. v
1, spp•snd
Mary H. Myers
known to me _
to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within
isstrement and ackeowledired that she ,vacated the same. V- � W
� 7 MVC DAMS
� --� OM�MN a 0
t� �C_=r WA oIrGOOOIMo
a.ut rvre oa .aiwrto �■Ot 17, I=
• Maury Pablic to and for saki County and State
Is"
.as Mail Tax Statements to Return Address Above root. No.
All that Po rti k the Northeast Quarter of Section 5, imship 13 South,
Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of
California, nccording to the United States Government Survey approved April
19, i881, described ab follows:
t ..-
Commencing at the intersection of the Weqterlv line of NEPTUNE. AVF.NI'E, and the
Westerly prolongation of the Northerly line of PHOF.BF STREET, as said streets
are shown on Map of SOUf'i COAST PARK No. 4, being Map thereof No. 2049,
Records of San Diego County; thence along the said Westerly line: of slid
NF.PT1 AVENUE the following courses and distances; North 19 ° 26'45" West a
disc -ince of 1,276.57 feet (Map record 1,276.43 feet) to an angle point in said
Westerly line; there a North 28 ° 09'40" West a distrnce of 132.2 feet (Rec.)-d
141.:2 feet) to an angle point in said Westerly line; thence to and along the
Westerly line of NEPTUNE AVENUE as shown on Map of SOUTH COAST PARK No. 5,
being leap No. 2078 on file in the Office of the Courty Recorder of San Diego
County, North 19 West (Record North 19'26'45" West) a distance of
1,003.48 feet to the TRUE. POINT OF BECINNINC; thence South 70'37'45" West .1
distance of 204.18 feet to a point on the Easterly line of that tract of land
as conveyed by the SOUTH COAST LAND COMPANY to the rOUNTY OF SAN DTEG0 by Deed
darod Jar.unry 10, '1930, and recorded in Book 1731, Pale 254, Records of Deeds;
thence along amid Easterly line of COUNTY land, North 21 ° 06'45" West a
di-Lance of 50.02 foot, thence North 70'37'45" Fast a distance of 205.7 feet a
to a point on th. ,.:i;d Westerly line of NE.PTVNE AVFNI,T; thence along the said Y
Westerly line of NEr'T'-'NE AVENUL South 1 East (Record South 19 ° 26'45"
Ea-;t) d is tance of :6 feet to the Tki'I: PO1';T OF BECINNING.
)
t
)
t
4
s
i
3
k
i
f
7 r
• .k
i
•
•
r
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY m 1963
SCHEDULE A
POLICY N0. ' 935030 -A PLANT ACCOUNTI ARB N0. 50
AMOUNT $86 +000900
PREMIUM $292*40
EFFECTIVE DATE' NOVEMBER 11+ 1971 AT 9600 A. M•
NAME OF INSURED
FERDINAND S. MATTOILI AND ARLENE C. MATTIOLI
1. TITLE TO THE ESTATE OR INTEREST COVERED BY THIS POLICY AT THE
DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN'
FERDINAND S• MATTOILI AND ARLENE C• MATTIOLI9 HUSBAND AND
WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS
2, THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO IN
SCHEDULE C COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS A FEE.
SCHEDULE B
THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF
THE FOLLOWINGS
PART ONE
ALL MATTERS SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPHS NUMBERED 1 TO 5 INCLUSIVE ON THE
INSIDE COVER SHEET OF THIS POLICY UNDER THE HEADING SCHEDULE B PART
ONE.
PART TWO
935030 -A PAGE 1
i
1- GENERAL AND SPECIAL COUNTY TAXES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR$ 1971 -72
SECOND INSTALLMENT = NOW PAYABLE AND WILL BE DUE FEBRUARY
lo 1972 -
2. ANY ADVERSE CLAIM BASED UPON THE ASSERTION THAT SOME PORTION
OF SAID LAND IS TIDE OR SUBMERGED LANDS+ OR HAS BEEN CREATED
BY ARTIFICIAL MEANS OR HAS ACCRETED TO SUCH PORTION SO CREATED -
AFFECTS ONLY THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND LYING WESTERLY OF THE
TOE OF THE BLUFF.
3. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR
THE PURPOSE STATED HEREIN° AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES
FOR i TELEPHONE AND /OR ELECTRIC POLES9 LINES
AND FOR SEWER• WATER AND /OR GAS MAINS
AND PIPE LINES
RESERVED BY = WILLIAM G- KERCKHOFF COMPANY9 A CORPORATION
RECORDED s FEBRUARY 19s 1946
RECORDER'S FILE NO -$ 17991
SAID DEED DOES NOT CONTAIN THE LOCATION OF SAID EASEMENT°
4- COVENANTS9 CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS —BUT DELETING RESTRICTION;,
IF ANY9 BASED UPON RACES COLORS RELIGION OR NATIONAL ORIGIN —
IN THE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS -
RECORDEDB FEBRUARY 19s 1946 IN BOOK 2043• PAGE 384 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS
5- A RECORD OF SURVEY MAP PURPORTING TO SHOW VARIOUS BOUNDARIES ANC
DIMENSIONS OF SAID LAND.
MAP NO -g 7038
935030 —A PAGE 2
6• A DEED OF TRUST GIVEN TO SECURE A N INDLEBTED ES IN THE AMOUNT
STATED HEREIN AND ANY OTHER AMOU
THEREOF A NOVEMBER 4+ 1971
DATED A S46 +000.
AMOUNT f FERDINAND S• MATTIOLI AND ARLENE Co
TRUSTOR MATTIOLI+ HUSBAND AND WIFE
TRUSTEE a OCEANSIDE FINANCE COMPANY+ A CORPORATION
BENEFICIARY a OCEANSIDE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIA`�ION�
A CORPORATION
RECORDED i NOVEMBER 11+ 1971
RECORDER'S FILE NO ,9 261829
SCHEDULE C
THE LAND REFERRED TO IN T POLI S ITUATED
CALIFORNIA+ COUNTY OF SA N DIEGO +
THE SOUTHERLY 50.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LANDS
THAT
OWNSHI P T13 SOUTh+ OF LOTRANGE NHEA QUARTER OF
BASE
T MERIDIAN9
TOWNSHIP 13
ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF+ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS=
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON ONE MAPSNORL2078NOFOTHEESOUTH COAST AVENU
AS SAID AVENUE IS SHOWN
PARK NO. 5+ FILED NOVEMBER 21+ 1927 IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO AOPOINT DI OOFRTHEIWESTERLY
WEST 229.43 FEE?" FROM
PROLONGATION OF THE CENTER LINE of GRANDVIEW STREET+ WITH SAID ARE
AS SAID WESTERLY LINE O�9ESAIDEPOINTNOF+ BEGINNINGSBEINGSFURTHEROIDENTIFIED
SAID MAP NO. 208
AS THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF O +L ND DESCRIBED IN D
H. GILBERT+ DATED SEPTE B
1942 IN BOOK i33 +PAGEWE59 O FF I CIAL
MORE IESS
THENCE SOUTH 70033115
THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID G I L BERT
TO THE O COUNTY N OF O SAN H DIEGO9 ERL
LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED
DATED JANUARY 10+ 1930 AN D COUNOTYDEDTHENCEOSOUTN316 °59G4025EAST
OF DEEDSr RECORDS F
UTH
273034 FEET ALONG SAID L INE
21 °06 °45" EAST 76.94 FEE
9 1934
DESCRIBED IN DEED TO HE
RECORDED MAY 11+ 1934
OF SAID COUNTYt THENCE NORTH 70 0 33 1 15" EAST 203.08 FEET MORE
INE OF SAI HALL OR LESS ALONG THE NORTHER NEPTUNE AVENUED THENCEANORTH 19°26045"
ON SAID WESTERLY LINE O F
WEST 350 FEET MORE OR LESS ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE
935030 —A PAGE 3
i
POINT OF BEGINNING+ AS PER RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NOm 11169 FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTYr JULY
249 1944s
NOTE SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE IRRIGATION
DISTRICT OF SAN DIEGUITOe
935030 —A PAGE 4
I
THE SOUTHERLY 50.00••FEET OF THE FOLLOWING - Q£S C LAND)
THAT PORTION OF LOT 2 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5r
TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH9 RANGE 4 WEST► SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIANP
ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF► DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS
• BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF NEPTUNE.AVENUE
AS SAID AVENUE IS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 2078 OF THE SOUTH COAST
PARK NO. 5o FILED NOVEMBER 21. 1927 IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY9 DISTANT THEREON NORTH 19 0 26 1 45" y
WEST 229.43 FEET.FROM A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY
PROLONGATION OF THE CENTER LINE OF GRANDVIEW STREETP WITH SAID
WESTERLY LINE OF NEPTUNE AVENUE* AS SAID STREETS ARE SHOWN
SAID MAP N0, 20789 SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BE114G FURTHER IDENTIFIED
AS THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO MARGUERITE
He GILBERT9 DATED SEPTEMBER 109 1942 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23a
1942 IN BOOK 13939 PAGE 399 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY;
THENCE SOUTH 70 WEST 193.63 FEET MORE OR LESS ALONG
THE SOUTHERLY L'I'NE OF SAID GILBERT LAND TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY
LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO;
DATED JANUARY 109 1930 AND RECORDED IN BOOK 17319 PAGE 254 .
OF DEEDS9 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY) THENCE SOUTH 16 °59'40" EAST
273.34 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO A POINTI THENCE SOUTH
21006'45" Y EAST 76.94 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN DEED TO HERBERT R• HALLS ET UXp DATED MAY S9 1934
RECORDED MAY 119 1934 IN BOOK 290► PAGE 315 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS
OF SAID COUNTY) THENCE NORTH 70 EAST 203.08 FEET MORE
OR LESS ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID HALL LAND TO A POINT
ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF NEPTUNE AVENUE) THENCE NORTH 19
WEST 350 FEET MORE OR LESS ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING) AS PER RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 11169 FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTYP JULY
249 1944•
EXHIBIT A — PAGE 1 OF 1
' r
Recording request, ,Dy:
City of Encinitas )
When Recorded, Mail To: )
City Engineer )
City of Encinitas )
527 Encinitas Blvd. 1
Encinitas, CA 92024 } SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY
For the benefit of the City
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
Assessor's Parcel Log No.:
No. 254- 040 -29 Project: IV IA
W.0. No.. _ /A
ROBERT H. JOSEPH, Trustee and THOMAS P. COTTER and MARIE T. COTTER,
hereinafter designated Granto_r.(s) do(es) hereby grant, bargain,
convey and release unto the City of Encinitas herein designated
Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement and
right -of -way upon, through, under. over and across the hereinafter
described real property for the maintenance, repair, replacement,
reconstruction and inspection of an enclosed or unenclosed flood
DRAINAGE channel and Call structures incidental thereto, and for the
flowage of any waters in, over., upon or through said channel,
together with the perpetual right to remove buildings, structures,
trees, bushes, undergrowth, and any other obstruction interfering
with the use of said easement and right -of -way by the Grantee, its
successors or assigns. To have Find to hold said easement and
right -of -way unto itself and unto its successors and assigns
forever together with the right to convey said easement, or any
portion of said easement, to rather public agencies.
The real property referred to hereinabove and made subject to said
easement and right -of -way by this grant is situated in the City of
Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, and is
The Southerly 7.50 feel: of the Northerly 50.00 feet of the
Southerly 100.00 feet of that portion of Lot 2 in the
Northeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 13 South, Range 4
West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of
Encinitas County of San D.Lego, State of California, according
to Official Plat thereof described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of Neptune Avenue
as said Avenue is shown on Man No. 2078 of the SOUTH COAST
PARK No. 5 1 fil(2d 21 1927 in the Office of County
Recorder of San )i.ego c- distant thereon North 19 ° 26' 45
West, 229. >.3 feet fr_ a p.oi-n.t: or intersection of the Westerly
prolongation o:c h.e of Grandview Street, with said
`I'F /04/MS7- 893wp5 1(5-1-89)
=r, 1_:'_ : 45 ID: GRCLIF' DE_TA TEL HO: E 5 0 G1'
'c
—Now
SOUTHWEST
The proven Leader In Trenahleas Pipeline A000netruatlon
September 18, 1991
E 90101328
ir. Bill Dobbins
roup Delta Consultants, Inc,
+455 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite. 100
San Diego, CA 92123
Re: Neptune Avenue Storm Drain
City of Leucadia
Bear *fir. •��.�, {ns:
Insituform' Southwest {ISW) is pleased to present this proposal for the Insituforming of
approximately 92 feet of 18" storm drain from the catch basin in Neptune Avenue to the grate
at the top of the slope. However, prior to Insituforming this line, a complete video inspection
and cleaning must be completed on the pipe to prepare for the Insituform activity. The
following is the price for the video inspection / ' eaning and Insituforming of this line.
Video inspection and cleaning of approximately 92 feet of 18 inch
pipe at $1,600.00 per day at one (1) day estimate.
Subtotal — $1,600.00
Insituform approximately 92 feet of 18 inch pipe with polyester
resin at lump sum.
Subtotal $20,250.00
TOTAL a $21,850.00
The cost of the video inspection /cleaning will include the deternd nation of the condition
of the line and the pipe length. If the client or ISW wants to end the contract after this activity,
then it only owes ISW for the video inspection and cleaning activity.
'k
7q'!
718 SOUTH PRIMROSE AVENUE + MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA 81018 • (ete) 943-0068 • PAX 018) 3034M
REGIONAL OFFICES IN SAN DIEGO AND PHOENIX ARIZONA
=EF -1- -' 91 THU 1-:19 ID: GROUP DELTA TEL t 10: r 1 0069 9332 PO4
V
SEPTEMBER 10, 1 991
PROJEC #9130
PA¢E 2
WE APPRECIATE TH OPPORTUNITY Of $ N WHERE
BNO TkIS1 P ROPOSAL;
AN
tT MECT5 WI YOUR APPROVAL, KI NDLY SIG
RETURN ONE COPY TO THIS OFFICE.
VERY TRULY YOU So
JAMES HENRY
A CCEPTANCC:
VATE�
TITLE:
r
CONTRACTORS ARE REQU I REO BY LAW TO BE I U CEN ED AND R
ULTE A 8e
CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BO ARD .
CONTRACTOR MAY BE REFERREO O THE R AMENTRAR. CO NTRACTORS STATF
LICCNSC BOARD, 1020 N STRE
• U" AIJL PTUR E TM A RESOR ARCHITECT AND ASSOCIATES
SCOTT KEVIN KIME, PARTNER
1 35 LIVERPOOL DRIVE • SUITE C 0CARDIFF BYTHESEA• CALIFORNIA* 92007
61 9- 753 -BO22
FEBRUARY 22, 1988
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN,
THIS LETTER IS TO AFFIRM MY FEELINGS THAT A POTENTIAL HAZARD TO
PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE PUBLIC COULD OCCUR AT 1638 NEPTUNE AVENUE
( MATTIOLI RESIDENCE) LEUCADIA, WHERE A 25 YEAR OLD 2' DIAMETER
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE DRAINS A LARGE WATERSHED UNDER THE MATTIOLI
PROPERTY AND OUT TO THE BLUFF BASE.
I WAS ASKED BY ATTORNEY KRIS PELZ IN 1985 TO INVESTIGATE THE BLUFF
COLLAPSE IN SOLANA BEACH AT THE KUHLMAN AND STEINBERG RESIDENCES.
THAT COLLAPSE WAS PRIMARILY A RESULT OF A BADLY CORRODED (RUSTED
THROUGH) METAL PIPE THAT EVENTUALLY BECAME SORT OF A LEECH LINE,
CARRYING RUN OFF FROM CIRCLE DRIVE TOWARDS THE BEACH THROUGH ITS
LENGTH ALLOWING A GREAT SATURATION OF A LARGE AREA OF SAND BENEATH
IT. THIS SATURATED SAND EXPANDED, LOST ITS INHERENT DRY STRENGH AND
RESULTED IN PIPE RUPTURE, EROSION AND THE COLLAPSE WE SEE NOW THAT IS
SUCH A PROBLEM FOR BOTH THE CITY OF SOLANA BEACH AND THE AFFECTED
PROPERTY OWNERS.
IN THE MATTIOLI'S CASE FAST ACTION BY PUBLIC AGENCIES COULD AVOID THE
PROBLEMS EVERYONE FACES IN SOLANA BEACH. IT'S MY RECOMMENDATION THAT
THE CITY OF ENCINITAS USES EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL FUNDS TO REPLACE
THE PIPE THAT RUNS ON THE SURFACE AND "SLEEVE" THE PORTION UNDER THE
SIDEWALK:
I PERHAPS A PLASTIC TYPE PIPE WOULD BE MORE PRACTICAL. A GOOD
WATERTIGHT SEAL AT THE STORM DRAIN INLET WOULD BE CRITICAL. THERE IS
A GREAT PUBLIC BENEFIT TO HAVE A DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS THE
MATTIOLI PROPERTY. NOT HAVING THAT EASEMENT WILL RESULT IN FLOODING
ALONG THAT PART OF NEPTUNE AND EVENTUALLY THE CITY MIGHT HAVE T
REBUILD THE DRAIN NORTHERLY UNDER NEPTUNE AND DOWN THE BLUFF A
"GRANDVIEW ". I WOULD ESTIMATE THAT COST AT $500,000 +/- TO $700.
NOW IS THE TIME FOR THE CITY TO ACT TO REPAIR THE PIPE.
I HOPE I'M NOT SAYING "I TOLD YOU SO" IN THE FUT
SI CERELY `
ST ART M. RESO
/ko
ARCHITECTURE • PLANr ING. 01 NTERIOR DESIGN • LANDSCAPE DESIGN
J.C. BALDWIN CONSTRUCTION CO.
General Engineering — General Building
SYCir i erSE
TY N11'AS
July 7, 1989
City of Encinitas
527 Encinitas Boulevard
Encinitas, CA 92024
Attn: Ted Shade
Subject: Storm Drain at 1636 -38 Neptune Avenue, Leucadia
Dear Mr. Shade,
I have been retained by Arlene Mattioli to help solve the
situation concerning the rusted 18 inch drain pipe at her resi-
dence, 1636 -68 Neptune Avenue, Leucadia.
Per our meeting, we agreed the safest way to repair the pipe
would be to sleeve the inside with 15 inch P.V.C. pipe, replace
the intermediate catch basin and grate in the yard and pour a 9 foot
high foundation for the discharge end of the pipe.
The total cost of the project including concrete, concrete
pumping, concrete forms, P.V.C. pipe, catch basin and grate, labor,
profit and overhead is estimated to be $19,680.00.
Sincerely,
qcx"�
James Baldwin
Owner
1561 Neptune Avenue • Leucadia, California 92024 • (6197 436 66 2
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
Walter F. Crampton Engineers and Geologists
Barry R. Bevier 4455 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 100
Phillip C. Birkhahn San Diego, CA 92123
Braven R. Smillie Tel (619) 573 -1777 Fax (619) 573 -0069
Project No. 1316 -ECOl
September 7, 1990
Ms. Arlene Mattioli
1636 -38 Neptune Avenue
Encinitas, California 92024
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR
REHABILITATION OF STORM DRAIN
1638 NEPTUNE AVENUE
LEUCADIA, CALIFORNIA
Dear Ms. Mattioli,
Group Delta Consultants, Inc. (GDC) is pleased to submit this
proposal for preparation of construction drawings for
rehabilitation of an existing storm drain at 1638 Neptune Avenue in
Leucadia, California.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The subject site is located on a coastal bluff overlooking the
Pacific Ocean, at an elevation of approximately 95 feet above mean
sea level. - The subject site is further located adjacent a
topographic low on Neptune Avenue such that tributary drainage from
a moderate urban watershed drains to this location as surface
drainage ultimately to a curb inlet and associated catch basin
located at the northeast corner of the subject site. Drainage is
then conveyed down the face of the bluff via an 18 -inch corrugated
metal pipe that follows the northerly property line to a grated
inlet located near the northwesterly corner of the relatively level
developed part of the site, and thereafter as a partly exposed
conduit down the face of the coastal bluff, ultimately discharging
near the base of the bluff near elevation 15+ feet.
We are in receipt of a letter to you dated October 14, 1988 from
the City of Encinitas describing the general deterioration of the
Ms. Arlene Mattioli September 7, 1990
Project No. 1316 -EC01 Page 2
pipeline, and their suggested recommendations for rehabilitation of
the pipeline. On September 5, 1990, we met at the site with
Messrs. James Baldwin, Charles Marvin, and your son, David, to
discuss rehabilitation of the pipeline and suitable methods for
terminating the pipeline at the base of the bluff. In summary, it
was our conclusion that the pipe should be re -lined to provide a
contiguous structural repair. The lower 20+ feet of the pipe
should be replaced, and the entire lower portion cast into a
massive concrete foundation, integral with the existing concrete
seawall and keyed into the erosion - resistant formational sandstone
exposed at the base of the bluff.
In this regard, we propose to prepare construction documents for
rehabilitation of the storm drain, extending from the existing curb
inlet down to the base of the coastal bluff. As we understand,
permission for this repair work is required from both the City of
Encinitas and the California Coastal Commission. We have done
considerable work with the California Coastal Commission, and
believe that we have a good relationship with Commission staff.
However, since the Coastal Commission's permit is of a
discretionary nature and we have been told by Mr. Marvin that staff
does not currently support a concrete headwall at the base of the
bluff, we cannot guarantee that the plans we prepare will be
approved by the Commission or, for that matter, even by the City of
Encinitas. In this regard, it is difficult, if not impossible, to
quantify total costs associated with preparation of "suitable"
construction documents, and would therefore propose to perform
these services on a time - and - materials basis. Based on our past
experience with the California Coastal Commission, we would suggest
that $7,500 be initially allocated for preparation of construction
documents for preliminary approval by both Commission staff and the
City of Encinitas. We are optimistic that we can reach a
philosophical agreement with both agencies on methods of
rehabilitation of the existing storm drain, and we will not exceed
the amount of $7,500 without your prior approval.
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
Ms. Arlene Mattiolo • September 7, 1990
Project No. 1316 -EC01 Page 3
CONDITIONS OF SERVICE
We propose to perform our services and invoice in accordance with
the attached Conditions of Service (Exhibit A) and 1990 Fee
Schedule (Exhibit B) on a time - and - materials basis. We appreciate
the opportunity to submit this proposal, and look forward to
working with you on this project. If you wish us to perform the
scope of services described above, please sign in the space
indicated below and return one signed copy to this office. Your
signature will serve as our authorization to proceed, and your
acknowledgement of your understanding of this agreement and the
attached Conditions of Service and 1990 Fee Schedule. If you have
any questions or require additional information, please give us a
call.
Very truly oy urs,
Walter . Crampton, Principal Engineer
for GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
WFC /j c
Attachments
The undersigned, being duly authorized, hereby accepts and
specifically agrees to be bound by the above document and exhibits
attached hereto, and authorizes Group Delta Consultants, Inc. to
undertake the items of work described in the above document.
AGREED TO THIS DAY OF ,19
Ms. Arlene Mattioli
1636 -38 Neptune Avenue
Encinitas, California 92024
SIGNATURE
NAME
TITLE
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
EXHIBIT A - CONDITIONS OF SERVICE
RECOGNITION OF RISK
Client recognizes that the interpretations and recommendations of Group Delta Consultants, Inc. (GDC) are based
solely on the information available to GDC. Client further recognizes that surface and subsurface conditions
can vary from those encountered at the times and locations where data are obtained by GDC, and that the
limitation on available data results in some level of uncertainty with respect to the interpretation of these
conditions despite the use of due professional care.
GDC will not be responsible for the effect on any opinion rendered hereunder of unknowns such as acts of others
on adjacent properties, variables of nature including but not limited to earthquakes, masking of rocks by heavy
ground cover or the works of man, acts of God or other variables beyond the control of GDC.
GDC shall write reports so as to meet the administrative requirements of local governmental agencies; however,
as the decisions of such agencies are discretionary, GDC does not guarantee the approval of its reports or of
Client's project by any governmental agency.
PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
GDC represents that the services shall be performed, within the limits prescribed by Client, in a manner
consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other professional consultants under
similar circumstances. No other representations to Client, express or implied, and no warranty or guarantee
is included or intended in this Agreement, or in any report, opinion, document or otherwise.
INDEMNIFICATION
Client agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend GDC from and against any and all loss, expenses, including
attorney's fees, injury, damage, to property or person, liability, costs and /or claims arising out of the
services performed by GDC and /or work performed by client and /or other parties upon the real property described
herein above, regardless of the negligence of GDC, its agents, employees, officers, directors or shareholders,
except where such loss, injury, damage, liability, cost, expenses or claims are the result of the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of GDC, its agents, employees, officers, directors or shareholders; provided,
however, that any such liability resulting from any design defects (as defined in California Civil Code Section
2782.5) shall be the sole responsibility of the client.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
In the event the indemnification clause contained herein is found to be void, unenforceable, against public
policy or otherwise inapplicable to claims advanced against GDC by Client or others, the liability for damages
due to the professional negligence of GDC shall be limited to an amount not to exceed $50,000 or the fee of GDC,
whichever sum is less.
For any damage caused by negligence other than professional negligence, GDC's liability, including that of its
employees, agents and subcontractors, in the aggregate under this Agreement, shall not exceed the limits of
GDC'a comprehensive general and automobile liability insurance coverage.
In no event shall either GDC or Client be liable for consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss
of use, loss of profits or the additional costs of completing the development of the property described herein
above due to delays, incurred by one another or their respective subsidiaries or successors, regardless of
whether such claim is based upon alleged breach of contract, willful misconduct or negligent act or omission,
whether professional or non - professional, of either of them or their agents, employees, subcontractors,
officers, directors or shareholders.
METHOD OF CHARGING AND PAYMENT CONDITIONS
GDC will submit the invoices to Client as stated in the proposal or periodically and a final invoice will be
submitted upon completion of our services. All retainers are held for credit to the final invoice. Payment
is due upon presentation of invoice and is past due thirty (30) days from invoice date. Client agrees to pay
a finance charge of one and one -half percent (1 - 1 /2X) per month, or the maximum rate allowed by law, on past
due accounts. Payments shall first be applied to accrued interest and to the principal unpaid amount. Client
specifically agrees further to pay all expenses and costs, including but not limited to GDC's staff time at
GDC's current Schedule of Fees, attorneys' fees, and court and other costs associated with collection of past
due accounts.
If any invoice for work performed by GDC is outstanding and unpaid for a period in excess of 90 (ninety) days,
the Client agrees that, in addition to any other remedy which may be available to it, GDC may submit such
invoice to binding arbitration under the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association,
as the same may be in effect at the date of such submission, and that ,judgment upon the award rendered in such
arbitration may be entered in any court having ,jurisdiction thereof.
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
ESTIMATED CHARGES AND PAYMENT CONDITIONS
GDC charges are only estimated and shall not be regarded as "lump sum" or "fixed price" or "guaranteed maximum"
compensation unless it is expressly so stated in writing.
ESTIMATED TIME SCHEDULE
Because of the uncertainties inherent in the services contemplated hereunder, time schedules are only estimated
schedules which are subject to revision unless specifically described as otherwise herein.
RIGHT OF ENTRY
The Client will provide for right of entry for GDC personnel, and for any other personnel and all equipment
necessary in order to complete the work. While GDC will take all reasonable precautions to minimize any damage
to the property, it 1s understood by Client that in the normal course of work some damage may occur, the
correction of which is not part of this Agreement. The client agrees to indemnify and hold GDC harmless from
any liability for any damage so caused by the performance of such work, unless caused by the gross negligence
or willful misconduct of GDC or its personnel.
SUBTERRANEAN STRUCTURES OR UTILITIES
Client shall indemnify and hold GDC harmless for damage or injury arising from damage to subterranean structures
or utilities (pipes, tanks, telephone cables, etc.) that are not called to the attention of GDC or are not
correctly shown on the plans furnished to GDC, in connection with work performed by GDC.
CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES
GDC shall not specify construction procedures, manage or supervise construction, or implement or be responsible
for health and safety procedures; shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of contractors or other
parties on the project; and shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction,
means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs. GDC testing or
inspection of portions of the work of other parties on project shall not relieve such other parties from their
responsibility for performing their work in accordance with applicable plans and specifications.
SAMPLES
GDC will retain all soil and rock samples for thirty (30) days following exploration. Further storage or
transfer of samples can be made at an agreed expense upon Client's written request.
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
Unless specifically included in the "Scope of Services," this Agreement does not include any services (including
detection or identification) relative to any substances which might be considered hazardous by an applicable
regulations.
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All reports, boring logs, field data and notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates and other
documents prepared by GDC, as instruments of service, shall remain the property of GDC. Client agrees that all
reports and other work furnished to the Client or its agents, which are not paid for, will be returned upon
demand and will not be used by the Client for any purpose whatever.
NO THIRD PARTY EIGHTS
This Agreement shall not create any rights or benefits to parties other than Client and GDC.
TIME BAR TO LEGAL ACTION
All legal actions by either party against the other for breach of this Agreement, or for failure to perform in
accordance with the applicable standard of care, however denominated, that are essentially based on such breach
or failure, shall be barred in two (2) years from the time claimant knew or should have known of its claim, but,
in any event, not later than four (4) years from the substantial completion of GDC's services.
DISPUTES
In the event that a dispute arises relating to the performance of the services to be provided under this
Agreement, and should that dispute result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in connection with such dispute, including GDC's staff time
at GDC'a Schedule of Fees in effect at the time of such dispute, court costs, attorneys' fees and all other
claim related expenses.
Rev. 3/88
EXHIBIT B - 1990 FEE SCHEDULE
HOURLY CHARGES FOR PERSONNEL
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER /GEOLOGIST 115.00
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER /GEOLOGIST 100.00
SENIOR ENGINEER /GEOLOGIST 85.00
PROJECT ENGINEER /GEOLOGIST 75.00
STAFF ENGINEER /GEOLOGIST 55.00
SENIOR TECHNICIAN 50.00
TECHNICIAN 45.00
ILLUSTRATOR 35.00
TECHNICAL TYPIST 30.00
TECHNICAL ASSISTANT 25.00
OVERTIME FOR PERSONNEL WILL BE CHARGED AT 25% OVER THE HOURLY RATE
HOURLY CHARGES FOR EQUIPMENT
VEHICLE:
Mobile Laboratory (Van) 7.00
Other Vehicles 5.00
Mileage: over 25 miles one way from office 0.40
COMPUTER 25.00
INCLINOMETER 10.00
NUCLEAR DENSITY GAUGE 5.00
OUTSIDE SERVICES CHARGES AT 15% OVER ACTUAL COST
LITIGATION FEES
Fees for participation in deposition, arbitration, trial, etc., will be charged at an hourly rate
of $150.00 per hour, 4 -hour minimum, portal to portal.
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
i •
D E LTA
ENGINEERING
CONSULI ING S 1 I IUC 11-11 IAL ULSIGN LNUINLLI 6
8/31/90
ARLENE MATTIOLI
1638 NEPTUNE
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
RE: STRUCTURAL SYSTEM FOR SUPPORT OF DRAINAGE PIPE
DEAR MRS. MATTIOLI,
AFTER OUR SITE INVESTIGATION OF THE PROPERTY AT 1638
NEPTUNE, WE FOUND THE SUGGESTED NEW STRUCTURAL SYSTEM TO
SUPPORT THE EXISTING DRAINAGE. PIPE NOT TO BE FEASIBLE IN OUR
JUDGEMENT DUE TO WAVE ACTION AND EROSION OF THE BEACH. IT IS
OUR OPINION THAT A MORE SUBSTANTIAL SYSTEM SUCH AS CONCRETE
FOUNDATION IS NECESSARY TO SUSTAIN THE FORCES EXERTED BY THE
DRAINAGE PIPE.
WE ALSO NOTED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE HILL THAT THERE IS A
SUBSTANTIAL MAT CONCRETE SLAB WHICH SEEMS, IN OUR OPINION, TO
BE IN GOOD SHAPE AFTER APPROXIMATELY 10 YEARS. IS IS OUR
OPINION THAT THIS EXISTING MAT FOUNDATION WOULD HELP IN
PREVENTING THE EROSION AND UNDERMINING OF THE BOTTOM OF THE
HILL, BUT WE DO NOT THINK THE FOUNDATION IS DESIGNED TO
PREVENT THE HILLSIDE MOVEMENT.
PLEASE CALL US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
SINCERELY,
AH
135 -C Liverpool Dr. Cardiff, CA 92007 • Tel.: (619) 942 -8649
IAORIZON!f
CONS7UCT01N
= P P "CE, Sf1N DIEGO CA
13G -3 aTE i_ICENSE NO
August 6, 1989 5 ¢!'`'_
i
Arlene Mattioli NiTAS
1638 Neptune Ave. WORKS
Encinitas, Ca. 92024
Dear Arlene,
We are pleased to quote the following storm drain rehabilitation
as you have outlined for the above address:
1. Replace last 20' of corrugated steel pipe (CSP).
2. Sleeve existing CSP from existing inlet to beach with
15" diameter polyethylene pipe (.492" wall) in one
continuous piece (115' + / -) and grout space between
old and new pipe. Remove and replace concrete angle
lug to accomodate new liner.
3. Replace grate on existing inlet in patio area.
4: install splash apron on beach with concrete approx. 10' x
7' x 3' thick poured into existing rip rap and sand stone.
Install "L" shaped head wall /retaining wall 1' thick x 7'
high x 10' long with travel backfill and weep hole.
5. Repair holes in pipe by grout fill.
TOTAL PRICE.... . .....................$ 21,950.00
(includes additional frieght for polyethylene from Texas)
EXCLUSIONS:
- -no engineering or design
- -no bonds, fees, permits or licenses
- -no testing or inspection fees
Priced and based on vehicle access to beach.
Pipe delivery estimated at 4 weeks from order date.
Please call if you have any questions.
Fsnjre y . 'L. Pray
`
Y Y
President
BELL CONSTRUCTION C ANY
• i
Custom — Residential — Commercial '
t I
i ..
t Dave Bell (619) 753 -2164
General Contractor License *458630
r
i
P ROPOSA L
7/28 19 89
Arline Mattioli
1638 Neptune Ave Leucadia Ca,92024
Dear Sir:
The undersigned proposes to furnish all materials and perform all labor necessary to complete the following:
Repair the 18" Storm drain running down thenorth side of 1638 Neptune
as per our conversation we wili provide 180 ft. of new 15in. PVC Pipe
with a concrete foundation at the west end of the pipe. We will also
repair the catch basin and grate in the yard.
I
All the abov ork to h
even unC e �
co al in ,asu},�,m$l and workmanlike manner for the s � of Gent -olle
° l�housanc[ s or V � V V // II UU (f 2 4 Dollars
Payments to be made eac as the work progresses to the value o
per cent of all work completed. The entire amount of contract to be paid withi 10 d ays after completion.
Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra cost of material or labor will only be executed
upon written orders for same, and will become an extra charge over the sum mentioned in this contract. All agreements
must be made in writing.
The Contractor agrees to carry Workmen's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance, also to pay all Sales Taxes,
Old Age Benefit and Unemployment Compensation Taxes upon the material and labor furnished under this contract, as
required by the United States Government and the State in which this work is performed.
Respectfully submitted,
D Bell
Contractor 4-0w/w
By
ACCEPTANCE
You are hereby authorized to furnish all materials and labor required to complete the work mentioned in the above
proposal, for which the undersigned agrees to pay the amount mentioned in said proposal, and according to the terms thereof.
Date lg
�R�li�.� Torm 1 / 7R �\ Q� \ „� I' ���— mi l.► Z
A.
FAANK A. WALKLA CO.. FVfLI1.9". CHICA.
PROPOSAL
z
DiCola Constructionxr
No �.
124 W. Glaucus "�"�", "M
Leucadia Ca, 92024 , `x ,7/2
Date,
4 .."
Phone # 436 -7511 't � � o
Proposal Submitted To: Work To Be Performed At:
Name _- _____.._._ Mattioli
_.... 3 t Stre Street_.________- __.6u8 Nep une Ave t 1638 Neptune Ave
16
City__ .. cadia Ca, 92024 - City Leucadia State Ca
State Date of Plans Per Owners
753 Architect
Phone _ ...
We hereby propose to furnish the materials and perform the labor necessary for the completion of
The replacement of the 18" Culvert pipe,Pour a foundation on the Beach end
of the pipe and do necessary repairs on the catch basin and grate. ____
This estimate is to include of 15inch pvc pipe,coricrete forms concret'�
Grates,and Labor._
All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and
specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of
n Completion In full opo leti.on Dollars c$ ,160. 1.
with payments to be made as follows: _ . _ P..._._. 22
_.. __ .. ..._.._. 00 ..__ __..
Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra
costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an Respectfully submitted T om. DiCola
extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent n ^�
upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry
fire, tornado and other necessary insurance upon above work. Work - Per
men's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance on above work to be
taken out by Note —This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted
within 30_ days.
.,ACCEPTANCE. OF. PROPOSAL,.k y
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do thework as specified.
Payment will be made as outlined above. a�
Signature'—_____
Date Signature
xn
TOPS e FORM 3850 ORIGINAL LITHO IN U.S.A.
i
SOUTH WEST DATE �^ ^ JOB NO.
718 S. PRIMROSE AVENUE a MONROVIA. CALIFORNIA 91016 ATTENTION
(818) 303 -6058
RE:
TO /�f/ s i4 /- /en c /,/ /� a A
WE ARE SENDING YOU I[- Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ya /,z�_
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
z approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS , mot °.six 0 yI ° ° i cQ f'� � Gv oi^,�
COPY TO // t� �t0 Y ��' /�a r' Y /• Zjj_
/ZO Qer'/r1 t� .C a /+i e�tdc �'• Zoe SIGNED:
/ p LOa
If eaKlosure are" not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
i - � ne
nsi�u I N V O I C E
WUTH EST " 10276
718 PRIMROSE AVENUE • MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA 91016 • (818) 303 -6058
DATE January 27, 1992
TO Mrs. Arlene Mattioli YOUR ORDER NO. Signed Proposal
1638 Neptune Avenue OUR JOB NO. J -91042
Leucadia, CA 92024 COMPLETED 1 - 17 - 92
TERMS: —NET CASH 30 days
FINANCE CHARGE OF I'l,% PER MONTH WILL BE CHARGED
ON DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS
ATTENTION:
JOB LOCATION. Neptune Avenue Storm Drain, City of Leucadia
Video inspection and cleaning of 92 feet
of 18" pipe @ $1,600.00 per day at one (1)
day activity $1,600.00
Insituform 92 feet of 18" pipe with polyester
resin at lump sum $20,250.00
TOTAL DUE $21,850.00
1 -28-92
NOTICE TO PAYOR — ""Under the Mechanics Lien Law, any contractor, subcontractor, laborer, supplier, or other person who helps to improve your property
but is not paid for his work or supplies, has a right to enforce a claim against your property. This means that, after a court heating, your property could be sold
by a court officer and the proceeds of the sale used to satisfy the indebtedness. This can happen even If you have paid your own contractor in full, if the su b-
contractor, laborer, or supplier remains unpaid. "
JUN
H El
GEOTECHNICAL CONTRACTOR
LTi OCTOBER 3. 1991
(619') 1-13.6031 PROJECT #9130
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS
4455 MURPHY CANYON ROAD
SUITE 100
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123
ATTENTION: MR. BILL DOBINS
SUB JECT: 1636/1638 - 1646/1648 NEPTUNE AVENUE, LEUCADIA, CALIFORNIA
STORM DRAIN REHABILITATION.
REFERENCES3.P AND SPECIFICATIONS DATED AUGUST 14, 1991; LATEST
REVISION AUGUST 19, 1991, BY GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS,
FOR THE CITY OF E
2.OUR PROPOSAL DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 1991.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOURREQUEST. Pf'.O BREAKING OUT T HE A C,0F, T
OF THE STORM DRAIN BOX AT THE
THE ESTIMATED COSTS OF REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF" 'f HE STORM
DRAIN BOX, AS PER THF� ABOVE REFERENCE #1, is $7 00-
IF 'YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CO NOT HE:)ITAT TO 6ALL.
V FRY TRULL�UR { S� j am'
JAMES L, HENRY
COPY: CITY OF ENCINi7AS, MR . HANS JENSON.
"?3 LA C�(TF..$RAiJ * OLIVEN14AI.N. CA 92024
JIM HENRY CONST' *CTION9 INC. • Page -1 of
721 LA Q(.IEBRADA State Lic. 0 3
OLIVENHAIN, CA 92024 #496386
TELEPHONE: 619- 753 -603
Invoice No.: 9130 -
To: MS. ARLENE MATTIOLI
16 6 -38 NEPTUNE AVENUE Date: FEBRUARY 18 1992
LEUCADIA, CALIFORNIA 92024
Attn: MS . MATT I OL I
Project: STORM DRA I N REPA I R
Location: 1636 - 38 NEPTUNE AVENUE
LEUCADIA, CALIFORNIA 92024
Contract No.:
P.O. No.:
Billing for Servic as F L
Hours Rat Date Descr iption _— – — cvy 1. CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN AS PER PLANS - 2. MATERIALS - 120 L.F., 18" C.A.M.P. ' AND
MISCELLANEOUS FITTINGS
3. REINFORCING STEEL W/EPDXY COATING -
4, TEMPORARY REPAIR ON LOWER END OF PIPE; 0 275.00
TIME AND MATERIALS -
TOTAL - $11,034.97
TOTAL DUE - $11,034.97
THANK YOU
- NCTICE
an or r, subcortrac.pr borer supplier or other person oho help to r rove r
property but is not paid for his wor scup r
"Under the mechanics' lien law (C to^n�a Civil ! Code of vJ Procedure `_;ect on 1 1 81 Et ° a ] t Y c . that, after a c urt hearing your property cru d r s .d by a
es, has a ryht t enforce a c s m r 3lrst Your cp °' y „
„
.r,� nrrv-.eeAs of the sale used to _o-_sry the uidabteCn�_s. : his can haCpen evcan if you t tire paid y - r ,,n ontractor n °_ . .F_ subcontractor lahorer _c ?c� er r_
EEP -12 - '91 91 THU 12: 1? IL: rPni_iP DELTA TEL t- 10:619 5'7^ c�c #982 P02
MATTIOLI RESIDENCE
163638 NEPTUNE AVENUE
STORM DRAIN REPAIR
ain lOB TWO WAYS
ALTERNATIVE 1
A. CONSTRUCT NEW CURB INLET @ NEPTUNE AVENUE
B, INSTALL 110 t FEET OF NEW 18 -INCH ALUMINU UPPORT14-
GAUGE) ON SLOPE AND CONSTRUCT PIP
BASE OF BLUFF.
ALTERNATIVE 2
A. CONSTRUCT NEW CURB INLET @ NEPTUNE AVENUE
B. CONSTRUCT PIPE SUPPORT @ BASE OF BLUFF AND
INSTALL LOWER 20± FEET OF NEW 18 -INCH ALUMINUM
CMP (14- GAUGE).
TEL h•10: F_�1 _ ._� � =,
G1G�r,g #982 P03 —. .
SEP- 12—'91 THU 12:18 ID:GPOUP DELTR •
'll'11Cnr�
O .oTVCHN[CA . CONTRA H
. 'f: SE PTEMBER 100 1991
'"
10191 R,OJECT #9
i!��•� +
GR u P DELTA CONSULTANTS
4455 MURPHY CANYON R O AD
SUITE 100 V I+
$AN DIEOO, ALIFOR 92123
ATTENTION: MR, SILL pO g8 1NS
Sup.. �, 1636/1638
- 1 646/1648 NEPTUNE AVENUE, LEUCADIA, CALIFORNIA
STORM DRAIN REHABILITATION.
P- NS AND SPEC I F I CATIONS DATED AUGUST 14, 1991: ATST
REFI�ReNC 'REVISION AUGUST 1 9, 1991 BY GROUP D ELTA
FOR TH E CITY'OF ENCINITAS.
- QR0AAlE WITH YOUR REQUEST, WE ARE SUSMiTTINO THIS pROpOSAL
FOR WORK A'. T` su9JECT PROJECT.
GENERAL, THE WORK WILL .-BE DANE TERNATOIVESN1EANDT2 +TW(: Al�OVE
IN AL
REFERENCED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, T WORK AS FOLLOWS:
BASED ON THE ABOVE, WE ,P•ROPOSE TO 00 $25,888,00
ALTERNATIVE 1 TOTAL. COSTS
• .� $2 1 : 1 74.00
ALTERNATIVE 2 - TOTAL COSTS
F > c R PERMITS oft
WE #V I LL NOT 9E RE5PO N4 'OR I NSPECT ION NOR S W �L WE BIM
ENGINEERING. SURVEYING►
, S I p4.r: FOR -UNOER4ROUN0 1JT I L I T I ES NOT St10WN ON THE PLANS Q
RESPON
OTHERWISE DISCLOSED TO US-
qr '.DA • OLIVFNHAIN, CA 92024
TEL
0069 #962 P05
EEP -12` 91 THU 12:1' ID:GROUP DELTR •
lr ,l Ne . iono A enuc • i•r �l�it.� �:,' "►Uf ':fir ",ic;� °7�C)24 r 7 `t'; 436•C.602
t•
1C. BALDWIN CONSTRUCTION CO.
Genutol Engip'ieuring Cor iiuctors
September 12, 1991
Group Delta Consultants, Inc.
4455 Murphy Canxon Road, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 9 123
RS: Mattioli Residence, 1636 Neptune Avenue, Storm Drain Repair
G entlemen:
We have prepared two estimates for the Mattioli residence storm
drain repair project. The first estimate will include 'the coat of
the new curb inlet @ Neptune Avenue and the installation of 110
feet of new 18 -inch aluminum CMP (14- Gauge) on slope and
Construction of pipe support @ base of the bluff. The quote for
alternative 2 is $29,680.00.
The second alternative will include the cost of construction of the
new curb inlet @ Neptune Avenue and construction of pipe support @
base of bluff and installation of lower 20 feet of new 18 -inch
Aluminum CMP (14- gauge). The quote for alternative 2 is
$24,320.00.
If there are any questions please contact me at any time.
ncerely, �..,...
g
Ja es C, Baldwin
i
uqa POE
EEP- 12—'91 THI_I 12:20 ID:GPOI_IP DELTR
TEL hlQ : b 1 � 5
` • P.02
0 ilot FROM JOHN C. R FD CONSTRUCTION
7Q S73 ®�9E5
1
j c. Dead C - O N
CAL, CONTRACTOR'! LICSHaS ayaa�ae
&AcC 1 "7
t619) 45.� -�us�► 1115 r u, as�x ss
212,!!6 a�r4�iY pu�c�►nrE HL�'��. • DrL NVAFL C� LIP- e:o14
geptembex 11, 1991
GROUP DELTA CONSULTA
4435 Murphy Canyon, Site 100
Sari Diego 04 92123
Attention: Mr. Sill Dobbins'
1635/1638 Neptune Avenue, Leu C adia,
g� MaGtioli Residence,
California. Storm Drain Repair.
Aa er your request we are submitting our proposal for work on the
p
above rrfsreriCad proj ect- Specifications
Work will be p in accordavi ion Au9u t 19, 1991, by
dated August 14, 1991, latest re
Group Delta Consultants, Alte=rnatives 1 and 2.
to d� the work as fallcws:
he per the above, we would propose
g34,s7o.o
Alternative # 1
X28,225.0
Alternativo # z
os�►1 the following; Permits Or
We are nvt including in this p rop testing ar 3nspsction. wa
fees for permits, engineering, surveying,
will net be rasp
onsible for � disclose which are not
shown on the plans or that have
Yours Tru1Y,
N C. REAP CONSTRUC'T'ION CO.
ahn C, Read
AGREEMENT OF REIMBURSEMENT
DRAINAGE FACILITY REPAIR
WHEREAS, Ms. Arlene C. Mattioli (hereinafter "OWNER "), the
owner of the property at 1638 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, California
92024 (APN 254 - 040 -30) has caused plans to be prepared for the
repair and replacement of drainage facilities on, in and across the
property, said plans being filed with the City of Encinitas as
0001 -DR; and
WHEREAS, the City of Encinitas (hereinafter "CITY ") has
approved said plans dated August 14, 1991, and filed as 0001 -DR;
and
WHEREAS, the OWNER has provided a drainage easement to the
CITY at the location of the proposed drainage facility; and
WHEREAS, the City Council on October 23, 1991, authorized the
City Manager to enter into an Agreement with the OWNER;
THEREFORE, it is agreed that:
1. OWNER shall construct and repair the drainage facilities as
detailed on 0001 -DR dated August 14, 1991, and
2. CITY shall issue a permit for the construction according to
0001 -DR without any fees to be paid by OWNER, and
3. When the construction and repair of the existing 18 -inch storm
drain according to 0001 -DR has been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, CITY will accept the storm
drain into the City maintained system, and
4. Upon acceptance by CITY of the storm drain, CITY will pay to
the OWNER an amount of
$7,500.00 for the inlet
$3,500.00 for Engineering
Plus one -half of the cost of construction verified by
invoices, with the payment for construction not to exceed
$20,123.00. The entire cost to CITY will not be more than
$31,123.00, not including inspection and other administration
costs incurred by CITY.
5. Upon acceptance by CITY of the storm drain, the CITY will
assume the responsibilities for the storm drain and the CITY
1
will have
and Maintenance CITY under the
e Agreement being concurrently execute
Easement d
by OWNER and CITY.
_ n
Ms. Arlene C. Mattioli, Owner Warren H. Shafer
City Manager
2
10/23/91 Regular Council Meeting
e
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Concur with Parks and Recreation Commission's
recommendation to award contract as stated above.
H. Approve Revisions to Workers compe own Protectio Income
Protection Plan Policies Clarifying
is Used When an Employee Management Wo Due
Injury. Contact Person
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve revised policies P002 and P031 for
inclusion in the City's Administrative Manual.
......,.. ::.::...... .;:;.:;
:.:::.:::.,.:;..::: ;;;:::.: >;:<:::.::;; >,:.:,:.... >; .:; >:.:;: ,::.::; :.;;;..:.::: >..: oaf, ::: xece�.v+�s a� # rav s
NQ'3.`�::;;:.;;;,A��.'��.�tl �.$erat��ns# G oux�c .: tors supp�et�.'�.
:..:... ].:::;::.;;;:.;::::.: .:.::.;:;.;:..:...,..::....:;
aflea;::: natet .:::::::.:::.:.:>;:;.;:: ::. >:;.;:,.;;:...;;;:.;; >;::... ;.::.; :.:.::.; >:.,....: o:.;;:is..7C.:;;:.;;; >;:::::.
rt ,.:..;....::::<:. m
a
on...
ter�..a .:.:.
actors
�an�acts��o�nc�.:shatzl�3 sn s�tate...before g.
J. In itial Consideration of an Appeal of the Planning
Commissions Decision to Uphold the Cardiff commun 22Advis
Boards Approval of Design Review (91- 143DR) ellafo r
Drive. Applicant: Thomas and Karen Sprink. APP
Kennedy, Thompson, Schmidt and Repa. Contact Person:
Community Development Director Murphy.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION. • Affirm the decision standard height of Commission
in upholding the Cardiff j`' CAB approval to ex ceed
denying the appeal.
K. Authorization to Enter into Reimbursement Agreement for
Drainage Improvements at 1638/1646 Neptune Avenue; Mattioli.
Contact Person: Interim City Engineer Holt.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorization for City Manager to Execute
Agreement for one -half of cost of repairing existing 18 inch storm drain, plus cost
of inlet replacement, plus reasonable engineering, not to exceed $31,123.00 upon
completion of the work and acceptance into City maintained storm drain system.
5. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR By THE PUBLIC
None.
6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (15 MINUTESL
Betsy Schreiber, inquired about the policy regarding the use of
City vehicles. The City Manager was directed to provide her with
information on the policy.
Page 3 MTG #91- ,BK#5,PAGE
10/23/91 Regular Mtg g
CITY OF ENCINITAS
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: October 23, 1991
TO: Warren H. Shafer, City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Holt, City Engineer
DATE: October 17, 1991
SUBJECT: Authorization to enter into Reimbursement Agreement for
Drainage Improvements at 1638/1646 Neptune Avenue.
BACKGROUND:
On September 6, 1989 the City Council authorized the City Manager
to execute a reimbursement agreement with the property owners of
1638/1646 Neptune Avenue for reimbursement of one -half the cost of
repairing the existing 18 inch storm drain, not to exceed $9,840.0
upon completion of the ttachment A) eptance into the City maintained
storm drain system.
DISCUSSION•
Subsequent to the action of September 6, 1989, the property owner
has pursued the project, and the status at this time is that
oyal the
plans have been approved by staff, and await final app by
California Coastal Commission. In the process of obtaining Coastal
Commission approval, additional costs have been added to the plans,
such that today the low acceptable bid for performing the work is
in the amount of $47,740. (Attachment B)
The property have the will be maintained
and when the wor
by the City.
Funds are available for such purposes in the Drainage Improvement
Fee account.
It can be expected that this solution for old deteriorated or
failed drains from Neptune Avenue to the beach will be requested at
approximately four locations in the future.
The only changes from the case heard on September 6, 1989 has been
changes to the design to increase the capacity of the inlet at
Neptune, and increased pipe replacement, required to produce a long
lasting facility than
addition f the inlet replacement is properly a
maintenance. The
ar2354
City requirement, and the reimbursement should include the full
cost of the inlet, this cost being $
In the process of producing the plans, several avenues were pursued
and efforts directed towards solutions to obtain approval from the
Coastal Commission. Since the initial proposal provided for the
reimbursement of one -half of the construction cost and the
engineering cost, it is estimated that a cost of $3,500.00 should
be added to the reimbursement amount, to cover the engineering
necessary for the production of the final plans. Documentation of
engineering cost allocation has been vague and the amount quoted
above is a fair estimate for the basic services.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager to
execute a reimbursement agreement with the property owners of
of the cost
1638/1646 Neptune Avenue for reimbursement of one-half the cost of the
of repairing the existing 18 inch storm drain, p not to exceed
inlet replacement, plus reasonable engineering,
$31,123.00 upon completion of the work and acceptance into the City
maintained storm drain system.
ar2354
Ell
r
Y�
ATTACHMENT "A"
--as
CITY OF ENCINITA
AGENDA REPORT
Aft
Meeting Date: September 6, 1989
TO:
Warren H. Shafer, City Manager
FROM: ���� Robert A•
Warren, City Engineer
f Public Works
Morton F. August, Director o
VIA: _
A 30, 1989
DATE: Aug Agreement for Reimbursement
SUBJECT: Authorization tOmentsratn163, /1646 tleptuneAvenue
Drainage Improve
EACR -- GROIIND: Frcn an Arlene Mattioli letter
Council received roblems she was having with an
In July 1988 City regarding P The letter is
of 1638 Neptune Avenue r a how property. an 18 inch
existing drain adjacent to estion i5 „
storm ,� The s torm drain in Exhibit A to down
corrugated metal pipe that connects two catch basins on Nep tune and
attached as the coastal bluff and
The drain was constructed sometime prior
runs betwee drain picks
outlets onto the n 1638 and 1646 Neptune ro erty, The reach. ear to be
to 1971 when the purchased doe n a public
ot
f street but it prope
- t
water off he city app publ
easement across the P5= e -51the
t
S . drain as there is no P was deteriorating
ade quately and ,.hat it above # '
r Mrs. Mattiolis stated in their letter that during heavy is function
drain did not xposed to the weather (most of the pip
from being
ground). inspecting the
the July 1988 letter by
ed on the
City staff responded to cleaning the Pipe
drain and recommending
that it be cleared determined from fUl
inside to determ and videotaped
It was also ine its condition. While
taping and extericr in
video tap replied th t o p ipe
significant obstructions were removed.
both interior vi City
was significantly deteryorated 1988 which summarized the
work performed and made rccommendations for
Mattiolis with a letter dated October 1
inspection and clearing
B.
further repair work. This letter is attached as Exhibit 11 items within the
reed to perform certain maintenaleted. in addition,
City sta�f ag and these have been ccmp
F th erform certain on -site work
street right -of -wa
staff recommended that e Mattiolis P Once the L
the necessary pipe
would pay half the repair cost. the
and obtain a minimum of three quotes .to Pe- repair
repairs and that City would assume maintenance °anted
repairs
facility, provided easements for a
were completed City public storm drain were g-
TS /03/CM11-1750wp5 (8 -30 -89-2)
{ S K a
_ In
Ci by the Matti.olis and the adjacent property owner at 1646
to Y
Neptune. the the
necessary work were solicited by
Four bids to perfozm The low bid was by
Mattiolis- These are attached for $1 9 , 680C11•
J. C. Baldwin Construc.cion CO.
t Council dated August 23, 19e9 and attached as
In a letter to C4 �• a repair.
t City Council allocate $9,
Exhibit "D" Mrs. Mattioli summarizes840h�ow?ard the pipe and
requests tha
DISC_ US6ION•
drain itself as well as the info rmasion
Review of the storm would indicate that the facility
supplied by Mrs. Matt ioli public Works staff feels that even
re pairs. on Neptune down
immedia need of re P c the ric- ht- of -waY
t1lough the drain frri�ate facility, it carries water from a public
is a P
to the beach
to accept it
streak and ther ` if e it is uimprovedp and l easements 1 are offered to
for main
allow maintenance access.
contribute to the cost
suc The app mechanism to allow City to would require
of improvement is via a reiproopertyno n_rs s and • h an agreement
City
two adjacent p C].t and Coastal
between the
the property owners to obtain the requicause the work to be
to perform the work, �h
Commission permits eti ion City Council to accept e
completed, and upon completion P .
drain into the publicly maintained system
t the facility and reimburse the adj acent
would accept City, in turn, airs, not to exceed
Mrs. Ma
insure that the
property owners one -half. the cost of the re
$9, 840. The four bids s_.L.L -ted b et ,5 price.
work would be performed for a comp
Various Drainage Improvements" for this
as Improvements" 000 in the 1989-1990 Financial Plan
��$10
City Council has set
under work project P
;.ype of wo rk. Thus the funds are available.
and submitted an inform
M as Exhibit
hibit
rs. YattiOl: hn,
prepared
for City Council review. It is attaches to his rep ort
RECOPSMENDATION: Manager to
Staff recommends that City Council authorize the City o wners of
execute a reimbursement agreement
with the property
storm drain, not to
t
heexistirgfl8 inch
the cost of repairing ursement of one-
1636/38 and 1646/48 Ne
840. upon completion of the work and acc
exceed $9 eptance into City
,
maintained storm drain sy stem. x'
J TS/02/C!1II- 1750wp5 (8-30 -89 -3)
ATTACHMENT B
1638 NEPTUNE AVENUE
CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES
30- Sep - 91
ALTERNATE 1
NEW PIPE FROM INLET
CONTRACTOR NEW PIPE, INLET INSITUFORM TOTAL
JIM HENRY $18,3.88.00 $7,50 00 $2,1858. $47,746.00
JIM BALDWIN $29,680.00 $21,85 $51,538.00
JOHN READ $34,870.00 $21,858.00 $56,728.00
ALTERNATE 2
INSITUFORM LINED PIPES, INLET
CONTRACTOR LINED PIPE, INLET INSITUFORM TOTAL
JIM HENRY $21,178.00 $33,000.00 $54,178.00
JIM BALDWIN $24,320.00 $33,000.00 $57,320.00
JOHN READ $28,225.00 $33,000.00 $61,225.00
Calculation: New pipe $18,388.00
Insituform 21.858.00
Sub -total $40,246.00
1/2 Sub -total 20,123.00
cost of inlet $ 7,500.00
Cost of Engineering 3 500.00
Total $31,123.00
ar2354
CITY OF ENCINITAS
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: September 6, 1989
TO: ++ Warren H. Shafer, City Manager
FROM: NNW ll Robert A. Warren, City Engineer
VIA: Morton F. August, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 30, 1989
SUBJECT: DrainageaImprovementsratn1638 /1646rNeptuneAgreement for
Avenue
BACKGROUND:
In July 1988 City Council received a letter from an Arlene Mattioli
of 1638 Neptune Avenue regarding problems she was having with an
existing storm drain adjacent to her property. The letter is
attached as Exhibit "A ". The storm drain in question is an 18 inch
corrugated metal pipe that connects two catch basins on Neptune and
runs between 1638 and 1646 Neptune down the coastal bluff and
outlets onto the beach. The drain was constructed sometime prior
to 1971 when the Mattiolis purchased the property. The drain picks
up water off the city street but it does not appear to be a public
storm drain as there is no public easement across the properties.
Mrs. Mattiolis stated in their letter that during heavy storms the
drain did not function adequately and that it was deteriorating ating
from being exposed to the weather (most of the pip e
ground) .
City staff responded to the July 1988 letter by inspecting the
drain and recommending that it be cleared out and videotaped on the
inside to determine its condition. While cleaning the pipe
significant obstructions were removed. It was also determined from
both interior video taping and exterior inspection that the pipe
was significantly deteriorated. City staff replied to the
Mattiolis with a letter dated October 14, 1988 which summarized the
inspection and clearing work performed and made recommendations for
further repair work. This letter is attached as Exhibit "B ".
City staff agreed to perform certain maintenance items within the
street right -of - way, and these have been completed. In addition,
staff recommended that the Mattiolis perform certain on -site work
and obtain a minimum of three quotes to perform the necessary pipe
repairs and that City would pay half the repair cost. Once the
repairs were completed City would assume maintenance of the
facility, provided easements for a public storm drain were granted
TS /03/CM11- 1750wp5 (8- 30 -89 -2)
to City by the Mattiolis and the adjacent property owner at 1646
Neptune.
Four bids to perform the necessary work were solicited by the
Mattiolis. These are attached as Exhibit "C ". The low bid was by
J. C. Baldwin Construction Co. for $19,680.
In a letter to City Council dated August 23, 1989 and attached as
Exhibit "D" Mrs. Mattioli summarizes the events to date and
requests that City Council allocate $9,840 toward the pipe repair.
DISCUSSION
Review of the storm drain itself as well as the information
supplied by Mrs. Mattioli would indicate that the facility is in
immediate need of repairs. Public Works staff feels that even
though the drain from the edge of the right -of -way on Neptune down
to the beach is a private facility, it carries water from a public
street and therefore it would be appropriate for City to accept it
for maintenance if it is improved and easements are offered to
allow maintenance access.
The appropriate mechanism to allow City to contribute to the cost
of improvement is via a reimbursement agreement. Such an agreement
between the two adjacent property owners and City would require
the property owners to obtain the required City and Coastal
Commission permits to perform the work, cause the work to be
completed, and upon completion petition City Council to accept the
drain into the publicly maintained system.
City, in turn, would accept the facility and reimburse the adjacent
property owners one -half the cost of the repairs, not to exceed
$9,840. The four bids solicited by Mrs. Mattioli insure that the
work would be performed for a competitive price.
City Council has set aside $100,000 in the 1989 -1990 Financial Plan
under work project PW069 "Various Drainage Improvements" for this
type of work. Thus the funds are available.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager to
execute a reimbursement agreement with the property owners of
1636/38 and 1646/48 Neptune Avenue for reimbursement of one -half
the cost of repairing the existing 18 inch storm drain, not to
exceed $9,840. upon completion of the work and acceptance into City
maintained storm drain system.
L N rs . tA.11 .' . I = `'. o r�
�.o.s Q ^ aeore�
c... 4A
TS /03/CM11- 1750wp (8- 30 -89 -2)
') CITY OF ENCINITAS
7CITYCLERX'S
�UNCIL AGENDA ITEM REQUES :
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM:
RE:
FOR MEETING DATE: 6
Staff Preparing Repo --4...
Consent Agenda
[ ] New Business
AGENDA TITLE:
ITEMS: — k A— C,. k,5
o.
RECOMMENDED /REQUESTED ACTION: AQ�
N.B.
THIS AGENDA REQUEST FORS MUST BE IN C INGETZ'S OFFICE SY 9 A.M. ON THE
MONDAY, 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE WEDNESDAY
ALL AGENDA PACKET MATERIALS MUST BE IN AYECITYCOUNCILSMOFFICE BY 1 P.M-
THURSDAY PRIOR TO THE FOLLOWING
APPROVALS /REVIEWS:
Public Worker ( �
City Manager ( ]
Dir. Adm. Service
[ community Services ( ]
Community Develop.
Other ( �
i termtool . , 1� '_I1 Lt(IM
' pUTFALL SUPPORT STRUCTURE
STORM DRAIN REHABILITATION
1638 NEPTUNE AVENUE
' LEUCADIA, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli
Project No. 1316 -ECOl
April 24, 1991
1
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
' GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
Engineers and Geologists
' Walter F. Crampton 4455 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 100
Barry R. Bevier San Diego, CA 92123
Phillip C. Birkhahn Tel (619) 573 -1777 Fax (619) 573 -0069
' Braven R. Smillie
Project No. 1316 -ECO1
April 24, 1991
Ms. Arlene Mattioli
1636 -38 Neptune Avenue
Encinitas, California 92024
OUTFALL SUPPORT STRUCTURE
STORM DRAIN REHABILITATION
' 1638 NEPTUNE AVENUE
LEUCADIA, CALIFORNIA
Dear Ms. Mattioli,
In accordance with your request, we are issuing the accompanying
' report to respond to the California Coastal Commission's request
for additional information to aid them in considering your
application for a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (Application No.
' 6 -89 -319) to repair the storm drain pipe along your northerly
property boundary. This report is intended to specifically address
questions raised by the Coastal Commission in their letter dated
' September 26, 1990, and in subsequent discussions with Coastal
Staff during a meeting on December 6, 1990, regarding support for
the storm drain outfall.
' We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and trust this
information meets your present needs. If you have any questions or
' require additional information, please give us a call.
Very truly yours,
' Walt r F. rampton, R.C.E. 23792
R.G.E. 245
for GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
' WFC /jc
(4) Addressee
(1) Mr. Paul Webb, California Coastal Commission
(1) Mr. Charles Marvin, Marvin & Moore City of Encinitas
(1) Mr. Hans Jensen, ,
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECO1
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE NO.
.SECTION
' 1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . • • • . '
2 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . .
3 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS AND COASTAL BLUFF EROSION 3
4
.
3.1 Geologic Units . . . • • • • ' ' ' ' 5
' 3.2 Coastal Erosion
6
4 NEARSHORE BATHYMETRY . . .
' TIDES, WINDS, AND WAVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
6 COASTAL PROCESSES . . . . . . . . . . . . .
' UPLAND DRAINAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
8 NECESSARY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS . . . . . . . . .
. 12
' LOWER STORM DRAIN SUPPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
FIGURE 1 - SITE PLAN
' FIGURE 2 - GEOLOGIC MAP
FIGURE 3 - LITHOFACIES MAP
' FIGURE 4 - UPLAND WATERSHED MAP
FIGURE 5 - MATTIOLI PLOT MAP
' -
APPENDIX A REFEREN CES
APPENDIX B - CITY OF ENCINITAS' LETTER OF OCTOBER 14, 1988
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
April 24, 1991
Ms. Arlene Mattioli Page 1
Project No. 1316 -ECOl
' OUTFALL SUPPORT STRUCTURE
STORM DRAIN REHABILITATION
1638 NEPTUNE AVENUE
LEUCADIA, CALIFORNIA
'
1 INTRODUCTION
' The subject site is located on the west side of Neptune Avenue, in
the community of Leucadia in Northern Encinitas, California. The
site is bounded on the west by a coastal bluff overlooking the
Pacific Ocean, and on the south, east and north by similar
residential development. A storm drain parallels the northerly
property line servicing the adjacent watershed, ultimately
' discharging down the coastal bluff to the beach some 70 feet below.
Past storm activity has damaged the lower portion of the storm
drain, and attempts have been made to get the City of Encinitas to
repair the lower portion of the pipe. Concern also exists
regarding the capacity of the inlet, and the homeowner has asked
the City to assist in mitigating the existing flooding problems.
As we understand, the homeowner, Mrs. Mattioli, has also attempted
to obtain approval of proposed repairs from the California Coastal
' Commission and the Commission has requested additional information
to aid them in considering the application for a Coastal
' Development Permit (CDP) (Application No. 6 -89 -319) to repair the
storm drain pipe along the northerly property boundary. This
report is intended to specifically address questions raised by the
' Coastal Commission in their letter dated September 26, 1990, and in
subsequent discussions with Coastal Staff during a meeting on
December 6, 1990, regarding support for the storm drain outfall.
On September 5, 1990, we met at the site with Messrs. James
1 Baldwin, Charles Marvin, and your son, David, to discuss
rehabilitation of the storm drain. In summary, it was our
conclusion that the pipe should be re -lined to provide a contiguous
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
1
April 24, 1991
Ms. Arlene Mattioli Page 2
' Project No. 1316 -EC01
structural repair, and that the badly eroded lower 20± feet of the
pipe should be replaced, and the entire lower portion cast into a
' concrete foundation supported on the underlying bedrock. The inlet
in the street was also considered to likely be inadequate, given
' the relatively large tributary watershed.
Our field investigative work was
during the
evaluation
' between September 1990 and Marc , 99
of the project, we have performed an engineering survey of the
Mattioli property, prepared a topographic map, reviewed the upland
' drainage and hydraulic capacity of the storm drainage system,
performed a geologic reconnaissance reviewed e pertinent geologic maps
' general area surrounding the site,
and literature, and reviewed available reports and other documents
describing the coastal conditions rentlaf1S1riArmy
' Considerable information is currently available from the U
Corps of Engineers' Coast of California Storm and Tidal Waves
Study. A list of the documents reviewed is included in Appendix A,
' References.
' 2 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
The subject site is located on a coastal bluff overlooking the
Pacific Ocean at an elevation of approximately 70 feet above mean
sea level, adjacent to a topographic low on Neptune Avenue, where
' surface water from the local urban watershed drains into a curb
inlet and associated catch basin. The subject 18 -inch corrugated
metal pipe (CMP) conveys drainage underground, at an approximate 9
percent gradient, from the catch basin to a grated inlet located partly atedin
a back patio walkway. Below the back patio, the pip e
exposed, and extends down to the base of the bluff at a gradient
approaching 50 percent. The pipe terminates as a cantilevered
structure, extending out past the face of the bluff, with the
' outlet invert elevation near +12 feet (MSL datum). The downslope
20 -foot section of CMP is badly rusted, and in critical need of
repair. During the January 16 - 18, 1988 storm, the lower 20 -foot
' section of pipe collapsed, and the Applicant shored up the pipe
' GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 3
with a vertical 4x4 wooden post and a horizontal 2x4 brace, secured
' to the adjacent wooden stairway.
Existing improvements at the base of the bluff include an existing
' stepped concrete wall and slab of unknown origin or design, which,
in part, provides vertical support for the wooden stairway, which
' descends down the bluff to a wooden landing near elevation 17.2
feet, supported on the concrete structure, and a lower stairway
extending down to the concrete slab near elevation 9.9 feet. The
' stepped concrete wall is approximately 8 feet by 37 feet in plan
dimension, and provides protection from coastal erosion, and
support for the lower landing for the existing private wooden
stairway descending the coastal bluff. The concrete slab appears
to be supported at it's seaward edge by a concrete stemwall
embedded an undetermined distance into the underlying bedrock
' materials and, at it's landward edge, has an approximately 3 -foot
4 -inch (3 upper wall which provides some support for the lower
' near - vertical sea cliff in this area. We have no information
regarding the design of this structure, or its adequacy in safely
sustaining major coastal storms.
Figure 1, the Site Plan, shows the approximate relative locations
of the adjacent residential structures along Neptune Avenue at the
' top of the bluff, the storm drain and wooden stairway which
parallel the northerly site boundary, and the existing concrete
' wall and slab at beach level.
' 3 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS AND COASTAL BLUFF EROSION
The coastal bluff profile at Leucadia, like that of most San Diego
' area coastal bluffs, results from the effects of marine erosion on
a steep erosion - resistant geologic unit, forming the sea cliff at
' the base of the coastal bluff (Eocene -age Scripps, Ardath, and /or
Torrey Formations) , and subareal erosion of a more gently inclined,
less resistant geologic unit which makes up the upper portion of
' the coastal bluff (late Quaternary -age Bay Point Formation).
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 4
3.1 Geologic Units
The following is a brief description of the lithologic and soil
characteristics of the geologic formations (ascending in age) in
' the general site area:
Bay Point Formation (Obp) - The Bay Point Formation
(approximately 120,000 years old) was deposited on an ancient
wave -cut platform, eroded during the last interglacial period
' when the worldwide sea level was higher. The bluff- forming
section of the Bay Point Formation is comprised predominantly
of locally derived nearshore marine sands, with a distinct
' basal gravel layer which forms the boundary with the
underlying Tertiary -age sediments. This weakly to moderately
indurated unit stands at slopes varying from vertical to about
30 degrees (from the horizontal).
' Scripps Formation (Tsc) and Ardath Formation (Ta) - The
Scripps and Ardath Formations, which form the lower vertical
sea cliff portion of the coastal bluff in the site area, make
' up two - thirds of the La Jolla Group of middle Eocene age
lagoonal sandstones and mudstones (approximately 40 to 50
million years old). The third member, the Torrey Formation,
is exposed approximately 1 mile downcoast in the sea bluff.
The Scripps Formation, which forms the upper section of the
' vertical cliff in the site area, is a very dense, very light
gray to tan, massive silty sandstone. The Ardath Formation,
which forms the lower cliff and is exposed in the nearshore
' platform, is composed predominantly of dark olive -gray, fine
sands and finely laminated siltstones and claystones. Wave
action has cut caves into the Ardath Formation soils at the
' base of the cliff. Figure Nos. 2 and 3, taken from "On the
Manner of Deposition of the Eocene Strata in Northern San
Diego County," San Diego Association of Geologists Guide Book
dated April 13, 1985, edited by Patrick L. Abbott, present the
general geologic, structural, and depositional relationships
' in the Leucadia coastal area.
' GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
1
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 5
3.2 Coastal Erosion
1 In the absence of structural discontinuities (joints, faults, or
1 fractures) or depositional anomalies (distinct changes in rock
composition), the steep lower sea cliff will tend to retreat at a
relatively uniform rate along a broad linear front. Retreat of the
1 upper bluff is more episodic than that of the lower sea cliff. If
the subsurface erosion process of the upper bluff could be
isolated, it would independently proceed to completion, or to an
1 asymptotic rate. For example, slope decline in the Bay Point
Formation, which makes up the upper bluff, would, over time,
produce a slope somewhat flatter than the angle of repose. In
' reality, though, continued marine erosion of the lower sea cliff
will tend to undermine the upper bluff until a slope failure and /or
' rapid erosion occurs, resulting in the episodic retreat of the
upper bluff.
1 As described above, lower sea cliff erosion (the controlling
component process) tends to produce a remarkably linear coastline
in the absence of structural discontinuities or depositional
' anomalies. Structural discontinuities, such as joints and
fractures, serve as conduits for wave energy, thus resulting in
accelerated erosion of coves and sea caves. Depositional features,
such as facies changes and filled channels, often result in abrupt
changes in the composition of coastal bluff rocks. Like structural
' discontinuities, these anomalous depositional features can also
result in extreme differential erosion rates and coastline
irregularities.
As can be seen on Figure 2, fault exposures are abundant along the
Leucadia coastline; however, there are relatively few faults of
' significance exposed in the coastal bluffs in the general area of
the subject site. As described in the 1985 SDAG Bulletin on Eocene
' geology in Northern San Diego County, these faults, which generally
strike north -south to north -20 degrees -east and dip steeply to the
east, are associated with ancestral tidal channels incised into the
underlying Ardath Formation and filled with sands from the
overlying Scripps Formation. Such is the case with the mapped
fault and filled channel indicated with a No. 5 on Figure 3. The
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 6
exposure of this approximately 5 -foot wide mapped fault zone is
some 300± feet upcoast from the subject storm drain outfall.
A fault /filled - channel feature, similar to that described above,
' was mapped by our firm immediately underlying the subject storm
drain outfall. This structural /depositional feature appears to
have been overlooked because it is partially covered by ice plant,
' and by the concrete which fills a small sea cave. The cave had
been eroded into the zone of weakness created by the fault. This
fault appears to be geomorphically associated with a partially
cemented, erosion - resistant sand filled channel, later exposed by
bluff retreat to form a small headland or promontory. The joints
within the fault zone, serving as conduits for wave energy, have
resulted in erosion of the small sea cave in the area of the storm
drain outfall. Although the sea cave has been filled with
' concrete, the jointing within, and surrounding, the filled cave
remains exposed to wave attack, thus creating the potential for
' future localized accelerated erosion in the area of the outfall.
' 4 NEARSHORE BATHYMETRY
At the time of our September 5, 1990, site visit, virtually the
' entire beach fronting the site had been denuded of sand, and only
limited zones of shingle existed on the beach. Bedrock was exposed
' at the base of the existing stepped wall, typically 3± feet below
the concrete slab, or near elevation +7 feet (MSL datum) . Rounded
boulders from 1 to 22 feet in size fronted the existing wall for a
' distance of 20± feet and, seaward, a sloping bedrock surface was
generally visible out to the surf zone. Nearshore bathymetric
surveys performed as a part of the Coast of California Storm and
' Tidal Waves Study (CCSTWS 85 -3) from November 1983 through February
1985 report bedrock locally exposed throughout the study area,
predominantly in 1984 and 1985. The nearshore bathymetric survey
further indicated a relatively uniform foreshore slope of 1 in 50
(out to the -10 meter contour) for a distance of approximately 500
meters. We have also reviewed bathymetric charts prepared by NOS
showing the sea floor topography off the coastline, which indicate
' GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 7
a similar foreshore slope extending to the -60 foot contour about
' 1/2 -mile offshore.
By January 1991, a relatively extensive shingle beach had returned
' to the site vicinity, with the gravel berm up to near elevation +10
feet, obscuring the nearshore bedrock generally shoreward of the
' surf line. A thin veneer of sand locally covered the bedrock along
the seaward margin of the shingle beach.
5 TIDES, WINDS, AND WAVES
' Tides in the study area vary over a 9 -foot range; the highest tide
is approximately 4.4 feet above mean sea level, and the lowest tide
is approximately -4.6 feet MSLD.
The winds are primarily from the west (toward the shore) ; wind
' velocities average 5 to 10 mph throughout the year. Storms moving
in from the Pacific Ocean occasionally bring somewhat stronger
winds, but the duration is relatively short. Tropical cyclones
' from the south reach the area on rare occasions.
Wave energy approaching the southern California coastline has been
relatively benign during the first 80 years of the 20th Century
(Seymour, et al, 1984). Extreme deep -water wave episodes exceeding
6 meters were only reported on 8 occasions during the period 1900
to 1979, while the period from February 1980 through February 1984
experienced a total of 10 storm events with deep -water waves
' exceeding 6 meters. The storm of January 17, 1988, produced the
highest measured deep -water waves of record approaching the
southern California coast since deployment of deep -water wave
' gauges by Scripps Institution of Oceanography, with 11 - 11.6 meter
significant wave heights recorded at the Begg Rock Buoy.
' Continued coastal erosion, in part accelerated by more energetic
wave activity during,the last 10 years, has subjected the subject
' site to a progressively more severe wave environment than that
experienced since development on the coastal bluffs began.
Moreover, the recent loss of the protective sand beach has resulted
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 8
in considerable additional wave energy impacting directly on the
lower coastal cliffs, thereby increasing the rate of marine
erosion.
6 COASTAL PROCESSES
During periods of high surf, the bluffs along this portion of the
coastline are subjected to direct wave impact, and a progressive
' weathering that continually weakens and abrades the surface of the
cliff, thereby causing progressive erosion. Mechanical wave
erosion occurs in discreet steps, generally in response to storm
' surf impacting the coastline. In the past, when a sand beach was
present, this protective buffer caused waves to break further
' offshore, precluding direct wave impact on the lower coastal
cliffs. The presence of sand also protects the underlying
formational soils from the abrasive action that occurs within the
' surf zone. This is especially true when gravels, cobbles, or other
resistant objects are present and moved about within the surf zone.
The shoreline movement investigations report from Portuguese Point
to the Mexican Border (CCSTWS 87 -10) indicated that, during the
130 -year study period from 1852 to 1982, very little coastal
' erosion was noted within the Leucadia area.
In recent years, increased wave activity, combined with more
' pervasive sand loss, has subjected the coastal bluffs to more
accelerated marine erosion which will ultimately adversely affect
the stability of the upper bluffs. Although the lower sea cliff is
relatively massive within the study area and marine erosion still
appears to be progressing at a relatively slow rate, in areas where
the lower sea cliff is badly fractured, accelerated marine erosion
' is apparent.
' In the vicinity of the subject storm drain (see Figure 1) , the
mapped northeast - southwest trending fault has resulted in a
10 ±- foot -wide zone of badly fractured material, which likely
' encouraged the growth of a sea cave which has since been filled in
with concrete. The concrete infill is located immediately
' northerly of the existing stepped seawall, and both were likely
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 9
constructed to retard accelerated marine erosion that was occurring
' within the vicinity of this geologic anomaly.
The subject storm drain extends beyond the coastal bluff at the
' exact location of the aforementioned fault and the associated
fractured zone of bedrock. The corrugated metal pipe has
' deteriorated to the point where the majority of the invert is
perforated, allowing considerable seepage out the base of the pipe,
creating an artificial water source which frequently flows over the
top of the bluff at the pipe invert, resulting in a nearly -
saturated slope in the vicinity of the already fractured rock,
further increasing the potential for accelerated localized coastal
' erosion in the vicinity of the storm drain.
' 7 UPLAND DRAINAGE
' The watershed upland of the subject site comprises approximately 8
acres of residential development easterly of Neptune Avenue,
extending up to the terrace ridge generally 250± feet to the east.
' A portion of the County of San Diego's 1 -inch equals 200 -feet
Topographic Survey, Sheet No. 330 -1671, has been reproduced herein
as Figure 4, with the orthophoto image prepared from photography
' dated September 17, 1975. The approximate limits of the upland
watershed have been delineated on the topographic map. Runoff from
' all lots fronting Neptune Avenue flow directly onto Neptune Avenue,
and then to the topographic low in front of the subject residence
as` gutter flow at gradients ranging from 1 to 2 percent. The
' portion of runoff from residences fronting Grandview and Avocado
that drain to these streets flow down to Neptune Avenue as gutter
flow, with gradients approaching 17 percent. The time of
' concentration for the watershed is on the order of 5 minutes,
making it highly susceptible to short - duration, high- intensity
' rainfall.
Watershed drainage is controlled by a 4- foot -wide curb inlet
' generally centered along the northerly property line of the subject
residence. The height of the inlet is approximately 0.53 feet, and
the local depression [in the gutter) is slightly less than 0.2
' GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
1
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 10
1
feet. Although the curb height above the gutter depression is 0.79
' feet, the adjacent driveway on the subject property crests at a
height of 0.68 feet above the depressed gutter flow line elevation,
or 0.5 feet above the gutter elevation fronting the driveway (the
' driveway crest has recently been reconstructed to 0.50 feet above
the adjacent gutter elevation, with both driveway crest and gutter
' sloping to the north at approximately 1 percent; previously, the
driveway crest was somewhat lower with a small concrete berm or
"speed bump" to aid in controlling the overflow of gutter flow).
Thus, gutter flow depths deeper than 1/2 foot cause flooding of the
subject property, the majority of which cascades down the northerly
walkway and eventually over the coastal bluff.
' In discussions with Mrs. Mattioli, we understand that the storm
drain was installed around 1969, and increased development within
' the upland watershed has resulted in progressively more severe
flooding over the years. In response to a letter to the Encinitas
' City Council in July 1988, Public Works Department Staff
investigated the situation, and reported their findings and
recommendations in a letter dated October 14, 1988, describing the
' general deterioration of the pipeline, and their suggested
recommendations for rehabilitation. A copy of this letter is
included in Appendix B. Public Works Staff subsequently replaced
' the solid manhole cover with a grated cover, in order to increase
the inlet capacity of the catch basin (Recommendation No. 4 of the
' October 14, 1988 letter).
In reviewing the capacity of the storm drain system, the inlet was
' judged to have a capacity of 4 cfs prior to cresting the adjacent
driveway (assuming 6- inch -deep gutter flow) without the grated
cover, and 6 cfs with the grated cover. The storm drain itself
' consists of 18 -inch corrugated metal pipe (CMP), with a 92 -foot-
long run from the inlet to the break in slope at an approximate
' gradient of 9 percent, and a 115 -foot section of pipe extending
down the coastal bluff at a gradient of approximately 50 percent.
Flow capacity within the pipe itself is approximately 18 cfs with
' the pipe flowing full (flow capacity with a 0.25- inch -thick
Insituform liner would be approximately 42 cfs].
' GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 11
In reviewing the watershed characteristics, Mrs. Mattioli provided
' us with a plot map showing the development within the watershed
since 1971, a copy of which has been reproduced herein as Figure 5.
A comparison was made between the 1971 watershed characteristics
and those that exist today with all of the lots now developed. We
have used the intensity- duration - frequency curves published in the
' 1975 Edition of the County of San Diego Hydrology Manual in lieu of
the isohyetal maps published in the October 1985 Edition of the
County of San Diego - Design and Procedure Manual to calculate the
design discharge for the 1 -year, 2 -year, 5 -year, 10 -year, 50 -year
and 100 -year rainfall, as tabulated below.
Return Pre -1971 Existing
Period Design Conditions
' Discharge Design
(cfs) Discharge (cfs)
1 Year 3 6
t 2 Year 4 7
5 Year 5 9
' 10 Year 7 11
50 Year 9 16
' 100 Year 10 17
' Clearly, the design discharge generated from the watershed
tributary to the subject storm drain inlet is substantially in
excess of the inlet capacity, even for relatively frequent storms
for either the existing conditions or at the time of the original
installation. Most agencies, including the County of San Diego,
' typically require that storm drains be sized to accommodate the 10-
year storm, allowing the less frequent storms to occupy the street
and essentially continue downgradient as overland flow. However,
' a general requisite to this design criteria is that principal
structures not be inundated during a 100 -year design storm.
Although we know of no defined criteria precluding discharge over
coastal bluffs, we believe that prudent engineering design would
also dictate that discharge over coastal bluffs from inland
' flooding should likewise be limited to a return period on the order
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 12
of 100 years. Both of these design criteria would dictate the need
' for necessary drainage improvements associated with the existing
storm drain inlet.
8 NECESSARY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
' The existing 18 -inch CMP storm drain is of adequate size to
accommodate all reasonable design discharges generated within the
' upland watershed. However, the existing curb inlet is severely
undersized for the existing watershed. Moreover, in view of the
fact that this inlet is situated in a topographic depression
' (sump) , the backing -up of water at the inlet could result in
significant flooding, ultimately inundating the adjacent residence
' and cascading over the coastal bluff. Given these conditions, the
capacity of the inlet should be increased to accommodate the
existing condition's 100 -year design discharge. We would recommend
' that the inlet consist of a combination curb opening and grated
gutter opening, similar to a San Diego Regional Standard Drawing
Type C Curb Inlet. The gutter should be locally depressed in the
' area of the curb opening, with a minimum depression depth of 2
inches. We would further recommend that the combined capacity of
the curb opening and grated gutter opening be oversized by at least
' 50 percent to compensate for effects which might decrease the
capacity of the inlet, such as debris plugging, pavement
overlaying, and variations in design assumptions. We would suggest
that the minimum length of curb inlet opening be 6 feet, and the
grate details in general conformance with the San Diego Regional
' Standard Drawing D -15. A second inlet also exists on the easterly
side of Neptune Avenue, which we understand has never properly
functioned. Consideration should also be given to rehabilitating
' this secondary inlet to further improve site drainage.
' As indicated in the City of Encinitas' letter dated October 14,
1988 (Appendix B) , the existing CMP storm drain is currently in
need of repair, and should either be replaced or relined. High
' quality liners are currently available that improve the structural
capacity and actually increase the hydraulic capacity by providing
a substantially smoother wetted perimeter. In our opinion, the
' GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 13
Insituform patented liner represents one of the better quality
' liners, and would likely cost on the order of $150 per lineal foot
to reline the subject pipe. It is extremely doubtful that the 92-
' foot -long upper portion of pipe could be replaced for less than
$15,000, and, thus, should definitely be relined. The lower
exposed portion of pipe on the coastal bluff could either be
' replaced or relined, and in discussions with contractors, we
understand that replacement costs may range from $5,000 to $20,000,
depending upon the restrictions placed upon the contractor in terms
' of installation, anchorage, and general care afforded to the
relatively delicate coastal bluff. Clearly, relining the lower
portion of pipe would cause less stress to the coastal bluff. The
' various agency constraints should be determined and reviewed prior
to determining the most appropriate type of rehabilitation for the
lower portion of storm drain. The lower 20 -foot section of pipe
should be definitely replaced.
' Where the storm drain exits the coastal bluff, some form of lower
support should be provided, giving due consideration to the local
geology, coastal processes, and environmental constraints.
9 LOWER STORM DRAIN SUPPORT
From a purely engineering perspective, we are of the opinion that
the entire lower portion of the pipe (that portion extending beyond
the most landward edge of the lower sea cliff) should be cast into
a concrete foundation supported on the underlying bedrock. The
majority of the existing pipe, which extends beyond the coastal
bluff, extends over the existing sea cave concrete infill, and any
new concrete foundation would require overexcavation of at least a
' portion of the existing concrete infill to place the new concrete
foundation. The required dimension of the concrete foundation
' would be approximately 3 -feet wide, and extend approximately 8 feet
back into the slope along the general alignment of the existing
pipe. This would place the proposed foundation no further seaward
' than the existing stepped wall foundation, and would essentially
replace the majority of the existing sea cave concrete infill along
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 14
this localized indentation immediately northerly of the existing
stepped seawall.
The proposed concrete foundation should essentially encapsulate the
' lower portion of the pipe, and be constructed adjacent to, and
northerly of, the existing stepped wall as an independent structure
' not relying on any foundation support from the adjacent wall. The
seaward edge of this lower storm drain support would be located
approximately 6 feet landward of the southerly prolongation of the
' adjacent coastal bluff to the north, and would be hidden from view
when northerly of the storm drain alignment. When viewed from
southerly of the storm drain alignment, it would be positioned
1 behind, adjacent to, and northerly of the existing stepped seawall.
Were the existing seawall to collapse during a major storm event,
' the concrete storm drain support would remain unaffected.
A suitable alternate lower storm drain support would consist of two
' isolated round timber poles, having a minimum diameter of 16
inches, embedded in 3- foot - diameter drilled shafts, drilled to a
tip elevation of +1 foot (MSL), and backfilled with concrete up to
' a height of 18 inches below the pipe invert. The two wooden poles
should be spaced 7z feet apart, with the seaward -most pole aligned
with the seaward edge of the existing stepped seawall. This
t location coincides with a highly fractured zone of bedrock, and
both poles would straddle the existing sea cave concrete infill.
The lower 20 -foot section of pipe should be placed in a fabricated
cradle securely attached to the two wood poles.
' Although this alternate foundation support system would likely
provide adequate support for the storm drain, it is clearly not as
durable as the concrete foundation, and provides only limited
protection from the accelerated marine erosion occurring in the
vicinity of the storm drain alignment.
' As indicated previously, due to the configuration of the coastal
bluffs in this area, this alternate pipe support would likewise be
1
visible only from south of the drain alignment and essentially
recessed into the small erosional anomaly in the coastal bluff.
When comparing both storm drain supports, one should remember that
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page 15
the two wood poles, although less massive, retain the existing
' concrete sea cave infill, which would span the majority of the
space between the two wooden supports. The concrete foundation
would span the same total distance, and require the removal of much
of the existing sea cave concrete infill. Both alternates would be
well hidden from view when north of the storm drain alignment,
since the seaward edge of either alternate would be approximately
6 feet landward from the southerly prolongation of the adjacent
coastal bluff immediately to the north.
1
i
1
1
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
1
' SCALE: 1" = 30'
HOURS
'OT ELEVATIONS
' )NCRETE FLATWORK
' NCING
AIRS (typ.)
' TURE ZONE
' 30 )E OF SLOPE
25
t J _ 20
9
8
6
' 5•
' P A C I F I
Project -oject No. Figure
1638 NEPTUNE AVENUE 1316 -ECO1 1
' GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
\ . . � '. •. � '� \ � � �- Ill ,, ) � _ ,.�. � � �� ,; !
1 \
���:
1\ r
Ts
BA V QU1Tv
°C- 33 —
cam, ?� _! >
u Road ' t 1 3
Trader �., �. / •, 1 ' y, - •.< v�rl'. \ �l �"n G ( r � n ' a
wr
' +,`�: y �i 6- i 11 � / ` k>F.1Y
SCRIPPS FORMATION SITE `
Ta
ARDATH FORMATION n �
>120 FAULTS, LeU •. ••az i'.'� 1~ / ky� Yd �tr�'�
ALL- rN60 ?0 /65 ° NW,
WITH DOWN-TO-THE-NW SEPARATIO 1 X`�
BAY POINT FORMATION "S,
'J , Via,,•
V if
ARDATH FORMATION Ta�•Y, "1•' Q
Ent�; sfle t f Lt':
iTl \.7�: ;�• ' d /fjj
TORREY FORMATION w �.�,� -t •;'s!�- i ", ��''d => > 1$ ti
Di
�- is �l ,,; 1. "'•� •r1 ,_
t Seaside Garden.
Counl/ Park t;;�. .� 3 �• Piro% .,�. "Y:R > + {
C : •� 'it_: 1 �. /..�;.�,,.: ��.�f •f :.. it
�� 1J1V /.�' '� f'•l
0'.
Eg h•
vv I • � -�: iii..: ."
Enciw,raa
' GEOLOGIC MAP, TAKEN FROM 1985 SDAG BULLETIN ON
EOCENCE GEOLOGY IN NORTHERN SAN DIEGO COUNTY
Project No. 1638 NEPTUNE AVENUE Figure 2
1316 -EC01
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
1 �
7- w _
32 a.
' BA IQUIT S
' 33
Tryde� — r7 f• .k ..
Pars•
- ma.
• ;.
FAULTED CONTACT BETWEEN
SCRIPPS AND ARDATH
pv
• ; .�
FORMATIONS ON FLANK OF
REGRESSIVE TIDAL CHANNEL
DEPOSIT
t/�ry 1 sx 1 i� 1` n
Leucadia
wa
h ill
S .+- :, ' . ij� t�fj iii �!' ;� II• •
Encmaas 8eacn r t .� a' .r f �i jl G • .
Count Nuh `
6 dam, fi -: .
'�� .,. •• N� ;�i��,� ion
Seaside GatAans
County Park, 'f
mouNLuarr
r
ti•r.aTtr nrwC r+ I • � '
' Encinitas.:,.
ism 91
' LITHOFACIES DISTRIBUTION MAP TAKEN FROM 1985 SDAG BULLETIN
ON EOCENCE GEOLOGY IN NORTHERN SAN DIEGO COUNTY
Project No. 1638 NEPTUNE AVENUE Figure 3
' 1316 -EC01
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
AdEkk
T AL -� +�° t
t
-
j \ ,s R w .
r
-
18" CMP STORM DRAIN
' F
vo A �,
mA
-�
' LIMITS OF UPLAND WATERSHED -
1
o �
SCALE: 1" 200' ��`
UPLAND WATERSHED
' p roject 1316 - EC01 1638 NEPTUNE AVENUE Figure 4
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS. INC.
1
r
�ssr
Z
Ip �
<a IV v A V
1 J
I�Oh?Ihl1 sc sb QV
tl N
Q i �r
Ig
kt
OP
� n d ��t��r
.— w I
LP lz
1
in
LU
1 0 .,
' APPENDIX A
REFERENCES
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECOl Page A -1
APPENDIX A
REFERENCES
' 1. Abbott, Patrick L., April 13, 1985, On the Manner of
Deposition of the Eocene Strata in Northern San Diego
County: San Diego Association of Geologists
2. County of San Diego, undated, Orthophoto Topographic Map,
Sheet No. 330 -1671, scale 1 = 200 photography dated
9- 17 -75, by Rick Engineering.
' 3. Emery, K.O., and Kuhn, G.G., 1982, "Sea cliffs: their
processes, profiles, and classifications," Geological
Society of America Bulletin, v.93, pp. 644 -654.
' 4. Fulton, K., 1981, "A manual for researching historical coastal
erosion," Report No. T -CSGCP -003, University of
' California, Santa Cruz, Writing Program, published by
California Sea Grant College Program, 56 pp.
' 5. Gastil, G., and Higley, R., 1977, "Guide to San Diego area
stratigraphy," prepared for AAPG -SEG Petroleum
' Exploration School Field Trip, December 10, 1977,
Published by The Edwin C. Allison Center, 62 pp.
' 6. Kennedy, M.P., 1975, "Geology of the San Diego metropolitan
area, California," California Division of Mines and
Geology, Bulletin 200, 56 p., map scale 1 11= 2000
' 7. Kuhn G. G. and Shepard, F. P. 1984 "Sea cliffs beaches and
coastal valleys of San Diego County, California,"
University of California Press, 193 pp.
' 8. Seymour, R.J., R.R. Strange, III, D.R. Cayan, and R.A. Nathan,
1984, "Influence of El Ninos on California's wave
climate," Proc. 19th Coastal Eng. Conf.,
' Amer. Soc. Civil Eng., p. 577- 592.
' GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
1
' Ms. Arlene Mattioli April 24, 1991
Project No. 1316 -ECol Page A -2
APPENDIX A
REFERENCES
9. Trenhaile, Alan S., 1987, "The geomorphology of rock coasts,"
Clarendon Press, Oxford, 384 pp.
' 10. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, December
1988, CCSTWS 88 -8, Coast of California Storm and Tidal
Waves Study, Coastal Cliff Sediments, San Diego Region
(1887 - 1947).
11. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, December
1987, CCSTWS 87 -10, Coast of California Storm and Tidal
Waves Study, Shoreline Movement Investigations Report,
' Portuguese Point to Mexican Border (1852- 1982).
12. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, December
1985, CCSTWS 85 -3, Coast of California Storm and Tidal
Waves Study, Nearshore Bathymetric Survey Report, San
' Diego Region, Nov 83 - Feb 85.
13. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1984, Shore Protection Manual,
' U.S. Army Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort
Belvoir, Virginia, v. I and II.
' 14. Winlund, Ed, 1984, Southern California Chart Guide, 6th
Edition (referencing NOS Chart No. 18774).
' GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
' APPENDIX B
' CITY OF ENCINITAS
LETTER OF OCTOBER 14, 1988
1
GROUP DELTA CONSULTANTS, INC.
City of
' Encinitas
' October 14, 1988
' Arlene
1636 - -38 Neptune Avenue
Encinitas, California 92024
' Subject: Storm Drain at 1638 Neptune Avenue, Leucadia
' ear Mrs_ M?tt
In response to your July 22, 1988 letter raising your concerns
regarding the storm drain adjacent to your property, Public
' Works Department staff investigated the situation and has the
following report and proposal to make.
On August 11 Public Works staff performed a site inspection of
the storm drain running under Neptune Avenue and down to the
beach along your north property line. During the inspection, it
was noted that the catch basins on both sides of the street and
' the upper portion of the pipe itself were almost half full of
mud and debris (photo #1), and the grate inlet to the basin on
the east side of the street was heavily overgrown with
' vegetation (photo #2). Staff also noted that the catch basin on
the west side of the street (photo #3) had a somewhat
restricted opening and no grate.
In your backyard, prior to decending the slope to the beach,
it was further noted that the existing grate inlet cannot be
removed for proper maintenance due to a fence over the top of
it (photo #4). Decending the slope to the beach, most of the
storm drain is on the surface and appeared to be in fairly good
condition (n)lnto t 5) . At the beai there is
to 10 foot vertical bluff where the drain extends out onto the
1 beach and is supported by a wooden structure attached to the
stairway. The last 5 to 10 feet of exposed pipe was
significantly deteriorated along its bottom (photos #6 and #7).
' Also, at the foot of the bluff there were approximately four fl-
inch yard- type plastic drain pipes that outletted onto the
beach apparently from your and /or your neighbor's yards (photo
The upper ends of these drains were not located.
TS /03/CL8- 1879wp (10/14/88 - 2)
1
52 L+;,+nit.+s IS.)Lili%'ard, [ n.'initas, California 920-1-1
Arlene Mattioli
' Page 2
October i3, 1988
Public Works staff's recommendations from this initial site
' inspection on August 11 were to clean out the basins and drain
and to inspect the interior of the pipe with a special pipeline
videotape camera designed for such work. It was arranged for a
' pipe cleaning truck to clean the drain on August 16 and, at the
same time, videotape the interior of the pipe.
While cleaning the westerly catch basin, staff discovered that
' the reason that it was as full as it was with mud was that a
piece of wood used to originally form the catch basin had never
been removed and was partially blocking the entrance to the
' outlet pipe (wood shown in gutter in photo #9). Once this
obstruction was removed, the basin was easily flushed clear
(photo #10). The grate on the east side of the street was also
of o?�str.:cti ons . Prior to cleanin annroYinat_el.v one
square foot of grate was open and functioning (photo #2). After
clearing the grate, there is now approximately four and one-
half square feet of opening for drainage.
' While inspecting the interior of the drains with the pipeline
camera, staff noted that, generally, the 18" pipe running down
' to the beach from the westerly catch basin was in very good
condition. Staff did observe several small holes along the top
of the pipe in the area where the pipe runs along the surface.
' As mentioned above, however, the lower 5 to 10 feet of the
pipe, at the outlet onto the beach, is in poor condition and
should be replaced in order to direct drain water away from the
face of the vertical bluff. In addition, the four yard drains
' should be extended beyond the face of the bluff.
Public Works has the videotape of the inspection itself. You
' are welcome to arrange to see it at City Hall.
After performing the inspections reported above, Public Works
staff recommends that the following work be performed:
1. Repair minor holes in the pipe.
' 2. Replace the lower portion of the drain outletting onto the
beach including a redesign of the pipe support
(approximately 20 feet of pipe needs to be replaced).
' 3. Redirect the outlet of all yard drains away from the
vertical portion of the bluff face.
' 4. Replace the solid manhole cover on the westerly catch
basin in Neptune with a grated cover in order to increase
' the efficiency of the catch basin.
' TS /03 /CLS- 1879wp (10/14/88 -2)
Arlene Mattioli
' Page 3
October 13, 1988
5. Replace the continuous fence over the rear yard grate
' inlet with a gate to facilitate grate removal and pipe
maintenance.
Public Works staff recommends that you and /or the adjacent
' property owner extend all yard drains away from the bluff and
provide access to the grate in your backyard, immediately. The
City proposes to pay for and install a grated manhole cover in
' the street, and the Public Works Department will closely
monitor the basin during the coming storms and place sandbags,
if needed, to prevent overflow from the street. However, the
' storm drain clearing performed by the City and the installation
of a grate on the catch basin should allow the drain system to
handle the storm waters.
' It is further proposed that n i
the repair of the minor holes in the pipe, of
the lower portion of the drain and the replacement of the
t support and that the City will pay one -half the cost of all
repair work. The City will also assume all engineering and
inspection costs, but it is up to you to obtain a coastal
' permit for and accomplish the repair work, yourself, since the
pipe is currently a private structure.
Once the repairs are completed to the satisfaction of the City
' Engineer, the City will assume maintenance responsibilities for
the storm drain pipe, provided the necessary easements are
granted to the City by you and your neighbor.
' If the above proposal is agreeable to you, please let me know
and I will set up a meeting to discuss implementation of the
' project. If you have any questions or would like to arrange to
view the inspection videotape, please contact Mr. Ted Schade at
(619) 944 -5070.
' Very Truly Yours,
J
1
Robert A. Warren
City Fngineer
Attachments
r �
' TS /03/CL8- 1879wp (10/14/88 -2)
.. � � �.
.,� . � � . � �+ �; � I �" yam. �,
�.i �� �
y�
a 1 b _ � � �
�,
�' �.• �
+'
i��. • a
�.) . ' �d
� � .
1
�� a
�. �
' � 4_
t � —
7
�Rr
i
/ a t
AW
.y
i
I
''.
ro �
Y
{ 4
�+
n
Y
.� � �'
�� �
� �
i Y � 1 � q
s
f .�+
, ,� h ,, , a ..
Y� i � � �`�§ �Y � �
it , �-
E
' `�.
a dawn, �,,, �;
�" � �
�� � �A�
6 �
i i. a'a
� � �-
r a
.. s �i
T ...� •�
I
��� �' ,•�
i
,'�
d
I
I
s
i
WW"-" I
NNW
' WK
*+� at"
• r
a'' 1 qid k. r4�i = Yirr
Mw
• J . � -- T � •L .Y f � r b `' '�+' �. 1 -k.. � _ `� `� - s , _ -
T f ig
— it!L
Cir
a. Ar A% M�-Olp-
- --
'4.
T
e �