The URL can be used to link to this page

1995-4283 G/TE SC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA T SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Street, San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160 -0627 619- 280 -4321, FAX 619 - 280 -4717 June 5, 1996 Mr. Jerry Schnoebelen SCS &T 9511132 678 Neptune Avenue Report No. 1 Encinitas, California 92024 SUBJECT: Summary of In -Place Density Tests, Seawall Backfill, 678 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, California. Dear Mr. Schnoebelen: In accordance with your request, this report has been prepared to summarize the result of the in -place density tests performed in the seawall backfill at the subject site by Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. The backfill tested was located approximately at the lower half of the slope situated between the upper and lower walls. These tests were performed between June 21 and July 6, 1995. Field density tests were taken in accordance with ASTM 132922 -91 under the direction and at the location chosen by our field representative. The results of these tests are shown on the attached Plate Number 2. Maximum dry density determinations were performed on representative samples of the soil used in the compacted backfill according to ASTM D1557 -91, Method A. The results of this test, as presented on Plate Number 2, were used in conjunction with the field density tests to calculate the percent of relative compaction of the compacted backfill. The backfill material was placed by means of a conveyor system and compacted by "jetting." The jetting operations were approved by our firm to be an adequate means for compaction and the aforementioned material was approved as suitable for "jetting." If you should have any questions after reviewing this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional sere' is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, "tip �'. tl;; �• �- 1Reviewed by: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL + StIN:G, Glt`I C ugl s Hicks, Project Supervisor Charles H. Christia R.G.E. ##00215 IHIC: H:GET:mw �oQROfIrSSlpy,4 cc: (4) Submitted �� ,� N' C14 9�s s� _ 1 EX � P ,.. tJi y `Fjq � C K'A �s � OF CAl�FO� r`r JOB NAME: SCHNOEBELEN SEAWALL JOB NO: 9511132 -1� IN- 'PLACE'' DENSITY TESTS ELEVATION MOISTURE DRY DENSITY SOIL REL. COMP. TEST DATE LOCATION (feet, MSL) (percent) (p.c.f.) TYPE (percent) 1 6/21/95 Behind Seawall 92.0 12.5 104.4 2 98.5 2 6/21/95 Behind Seawall 94.0 11.5 105.2 2 99.2 3 6/21/95 Behind Seawall 96.0 13.0 105.7 2 99.7 4 6/22/95 Behind Seawall 98.0 13.2 106.1 2 100.1 5 6/22/95 Behind Seawall 100.0 12.7 105.4 2 99.4 6 6/22/95 Behind Seawall 102.0 12.5 105.9 2 99.9 7 6/27/95 Behind Seawall 104.0 12.9 107.3 1 90.8 8 6/27/95 Behind Seawall 106.0 13.3 108.1 1 91.5 9 6/27/95 Behind Seawall 108.0 12.1 108.9 1 92.1 10 6/27/95 Behind Seawall 109.0 13.4 107.7 1 91.1 11 6/27/95 Behind Seawall 110.0 13.7 107.9 1 91.3 12 6/27/95 Behind Seawall 111.0 12.9 108.3 1 91.6 13 7/6/95 Behind Seawall 112.0 14.1 107.8 1 91.2 14 7/6/95 Behind Seawall 113.0 13.6 I 108.0 1 91.4 MAXIMUM DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE SUMMARY ASTM D1557 SOIL TYPE SOIL DESCRIPTION OPTIMUM MOISTURE, % MAXIMUM DENSITY, pcf 1 Orange Silty Fine Sand 11.8 118.2 2 Tan Fine Sand (native) 8.2 106.0 PLATE N PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. (619) 576 -9110 4888 Ronson Court "G" Fax (619) 576 -7028 San Diego, Ca. 92111 • TEST REPORT JOB NO. 2012 JOB HILLSIDE REPAIR ADDRESS 678 NEPTUNE AVENUE PHONE OWNER CONTRACTOR CLIENT GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER NOWAK MEULMESTER ARCHITECT BLDG. AUTH. CITY OF ENCINITAS INSPECTOR DALE REGLI PERMIT No 4283 GI PLAN FILE FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN 2ND LIFT ABOVE GROUND SAMPLE OF: CONCRETE IN JOB OR STRUCTURE: UPPER WALL MIX NO. 6896P MADE BY DALE REGLI PROPORTIONS 8.96 SACK SLUMP 6" ADMIXTURE POZZ, DCI DATE MADE 8/16/95 TYPE OF CEMENT DATE RECEIVED 8/17/95 CONC. SUPPLIER SAN DIEGO READY MIX SOURCE OF ROCK TICKET NO. 6791010 INSPECTOR SIGN LABORATORY TEST DATA AGE TESTED DAYS 7 DAYS 28 DAYS 28 DAYS DAYS SPECIMEN MARKINGS 16452 16453 16454 DATE TESTED 8/23 9/13 9/13 AREA - SQ. IN. 28.28 28.28 28.28 ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS. 158000 198000 202000 UNIT STRESS - PSI 5590 7000 7140 SPECIFIED STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS - PSI 5000 DISTRIBUTION: GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION DEVIATIONS: CITY OF ENCINITAS • TEST METHODS - ASTM C39: C173: C231: C172: C143: C138: C1231: ENGI ER PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. (619) 576 -9110 4888 Ron�on Court "G" Fax (619) 576 --7028 San Dieg , Ca. 92111 TEST REPORT JOB NO. 2012 JOB HILLSIDE REPAIR ADDRESS 678 NEPTUNE AVENUE PHONE OWNER CONTRACTOR CLIENT GILHO CO N S TR U CTION ENGINEER NOW AK MEULMESTER ARCHITECT BLDG. AUTH. CITY OF ENCINITAS INSPECTOR DALE REGLI PERMIT NO. 4283 GI PLAN FILE FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN SAMPLE OF: CONCRETE IN JOB OR STRUCTURE: UPPER WALL CAISSONS 1 & 3 MIX NO. 6896P MADE BY DALE REGLI PROPORTIONS 8.96 SACK SLUMP 5 1/2" ADMIXTURE POZZ 322N DATE MADE 8/04/95 TYPE OF CEMENT II DATE RECEIVED 8/07/95 CONC. SUPPLIER ESCONDIDO READY MIX SOURCE OF ROCK TICKET NO. 1432735 INSPECTOR SIGN LABORATORY TEST DATA AGE TESTED DAYS 7 DAYS 2 8 DAYS 28 DAYS DAYS SPECIMEN MARKINGS 16398 16399 16400 DATE TESTED 8/11 9/01 9/01 AREA - SQ. IN. 28.28 28.28 28.28 ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS. 107500 155500 144000 UNIT STRESS - PSI 3800 5500 5090 SPECIFIED STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS - PSI 5000 DISTRIBUTION: GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION DEVIATIONS: CITY OF ENCINITAS TEST METHODS - ASTEll C39: C173: C231: C172: C143: C138: C1231: / ENGINEER PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. 4888 Ronson Court "G" San Diego, Ca. 92111 _� (619) 576 -9110 INSPECTORS WEEKLY REPORT FOR WEEK No. 201 2 ENDING ON ............ ............................... 19..... COVERING WORK PERFORMED REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY L� GLUE - LAM. FABRICATION WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY L ) PRE - STRESSED CONCRETE �� REINFORCED GYPSUM OTHER THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF REINFORCED MASONRY � PILE DRIVING .................................................... JOB ADDRESS BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER PLAT! FILE NUMBER 678 NEPTUNE AVENUE 4283 GI OWNER OR PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT HILLSIDE REPAIR CONSTR. MAT'L. (TYPE, GRADE, ETC.) DESIGN STRENG TII SOURCE OR MFGR. ENGINEER CONCRETE 5000 MEULMESTER DESCRIBE MAT'L. (MIX DESIGN, RE -BAR GRADE 6 MFGR., WELD -ROD, ETC.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR MIX #6896P w/ DCI, REBAR GR 60 GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION LAB. RECEIVING B TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L. SAMPLES P.C.I., INC. INSP 'N. LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. DATE INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT - AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED; NUMBER, TYPE, B IDENT. NO'S. OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN; STRUCT, CONNECTIONS (WELDS MADE, H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) Ct1ECKED; ETC. 8/22 Inspected reinforcing steel and the placement of concrete in 4 upper wall columns, final lift; and two beams. Made one set of three test cylinders. Work observed was in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Arrived on jobsite at 11:30 AM, left at 1:30 PM. I CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of our knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, substantially complies with approved plan specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report covers the locations of the work inspected only and does not constitute engineering opin Ion or project control. /�� " DALE REGLI SIGNAT41RE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR 8/28/95 280 DATE OF REPORT RFGISTER N111.IBER PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. (619) 576 -9110 4888 Ronson Court "G" Fax (619) 576 -7028 San Diego, Ca. 92111 TEST REPORT JOB NO. 2012 JOB HILLSIDE REPAIR ADDRESS 67 8 NE AVE PHONE OWNER CONTRACTOR CLIENT GI CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER NOWAK M EU L MES T ER ARCHITECT BLDG. AUTH. CI OF ENCINITAS INSPECTOR DA REGLI _ PERMIT NO. 4 283 GI PLAN FILE FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN SAMPLE OF: CONCRETE IN JOB OR STRUCTURE: UPPER WALL COLUMNS FINAL LIF MIX NO. 6896P MADE BY DALE REGLI PROPORTIONS 8.96 SACK SLUMP 6 ADMIXTURE POZ / DARE X DATE MADE 8/22/95 TYPE OF CEMENT I -II DATE RECEIVED 8/23/95 CONC. SUPPLIER SA N DIEGO READY MIX SOURCE OF ROCK TICKET NO. 6791444 INSPECTOR SIGN LABORATORY TEST DATA AGE TESTED DAYS 7 DAYS 2 8 DAYS 28 DAYS DAYS SPECIMEN MARKINGS 16529 16530 16531 DATE TESTED 8/29 9/19 9/19 AREA - SQ. IN. 28.28 28,28 28.28 ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS. 144000 UNIT STRESS - PSI 5090 SPECIFIED STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS - PSI 5000 DISTRIBUTION: GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION DEVIATIONS: CITY OF ENCINITAS TEST METHODS - ASTMS C39: C173: C231: C172: C143: C138: C1231: . zZ/ ENGINEER PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. (619) 576 -9110 4888 Ronson Court "G" Fax (619) 576 -7028 San Diego, Ca. 92111 TEST REPORT JOB No. 2012 ,JOB HILLSIDE REPAIR ADDRESS 678 NEPTUNE AVENUE PHONE OWNER CONTRACTOR CLIENT GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER NOWAK MEULMESTER ARCHITECT BLDG. AUTH. CITY OF ENCINITAS INSPECTOR DALE REGLI PERMIT NO. 4283 GI PLAN FILE FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN 2ND LIFT ABOVE GROUND SAMPLE OF: CONCRETE IN JOB OR STRUCTURE: UPPER WALL MIX NO. 6896P MADE BY DALE REGLI PROPORTIONS 8 • 96 SACK SLUMP 6" ADMIXTURE POZZ, DCI DATE MADE 8/16/95 TYPE OF CEMENT DATE RECEIVED 8/17/95 CONC. SUPPLIER SAN DIEGO READY MIX SOURCE OF ROCK TICKET NO. 6791010 INSPECTOR SIGN LABORATORY TEST DATA AGE TESTED DAYS 7 DAYS 28 DAYS 28 DAYS DAYS' .: SPECIMEN MARKINGS 16452 16453 16454 DATE TESTED 8/23 9/13 9/13 AREA - SQ. IN. 28.28 28.28 28.28 ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS. 158000 UNIT STRESS - PSI 5590 SPECIFIED STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS - PSI 5000 DISTRIBUTION: GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION DEVIATIONS: CITY OF ENCINITAS TEST METHODS - ASTI C39: C173: C231: C172: C143: C138: C1231: ENG-INEER PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. (619) 576 -9110 4888 Ro on Court "G" Fax (619) 576 -7028 San Died, Ca. 92111 • TEST 012 ST REPORT JOB NO. HILLSIDE REPAIR JOB 678 NEPTUNE AVENUE ADDRESS PHONE OWNER CONTRACTOR CLIENT GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION NOWAK MEULMESTER ENGINEER ARCHITECT BLDG. AUTH. CITY OF ENCINITAS _ DALE REGLI 4283 GI INSPECTOR DALE NO. 4283 FILE FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN UPPER WALL 1ST LIFT SAMPLE OF: CONCRETE IN JOB OR STRUCTURE: SOILDER BEAMS MIX NO. 6896P MADE BY DALE REGLI 8.96 SACK 711 PROPORTIONS SLUMP ADMIXTURE DAREX, POZZ DATE MADE 8/10/95 TYPE OF CEMENT II DATE RECEIVED 8/11/95 CONC. SUPPLIER SAN DIEGO READY MIX SOURCE OF ROCK TICKET NO. 6790 INSPECTOR SIGN LABORATORY TEST DATA AGE TESTED DAYS 7 DAYS 28 DAYS 28 DAYS DAYS SPECIMEN MARKINGS 16422 16423 16424 DATE TESTED 8/17 9/07 9/07 AREA - SQ. IN. 28.28 28.28 28.28 ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS. 138500 182500 183000 UNIT STRESS - PSI 4890 6460 6470 SPECIFIED STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS - PSI 5000 DISTRIBUTION: GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION DEVIATIONS: CITY OF ENCINITAS • TEST METHODS - ASTI C39: C173: C231: C172: C143: C138: C1231: ENGINEER PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. (619) 576 -9110 4858 Ronson Court "G" Fax (619) 576 -7028 San Diego, Ca. 92111 i TEST REPORT JOB N0. 2012 JOB HILLSIDE REPAIR ADDRESS 678 NEPTUNE AVENU PHONE OWNER CONTRACTOR CLIENT G CO ENGINEER NOWAK MEULMESTER ARCHITECT BLDG. AUTH. CITY OF ENCINITAS INSPECTOR PA RE GLI PERMIT NO. 4283 GI PLAN FILE FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN SAMPLE OF: CONCRETE IN JOB OR STRUCTURE: UPPER WALL COLUMNS FINAL LIF' MIX NO. 6896P MADE BY DALE REGLI PROPORTIONS 8.96 SACK SLUMP 61, ADMIXTURE POZZ /DAREX DATE MADE 8/22/95 • TYPE OF CEMENT I -II DATE RECEIVED 8/23/95 CONC. SUPPLIER SAN DI READY MIX SOURCE OF ROCK TICKET NO. 6791444 INSPECTOR SIGN LABORATORY TEST DATA AGE TESTED DAYS 7 DAYS 2 8 DAYS 28 DAYS DAYS SPECIMEN MARKINGS 16529 16530 16531 DATE TESTED 8/29 9/19 9/19 AREA - SQ. IN. 28.28 28,28 28.28 ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS. 144000 195000 196500 UNIT STRESS - PSI 5090 6900 6950 SPECIFIED STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS - PSI 5000 DISTRIBUTION: GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION DEVIATIONS: CITY OF ENCINITAS TEST METHODS - ASTH C39: C173: C231: C172: C143: C138• C1231: ENGINEER or PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. 4888 RONSON COURT "14" 1 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111.TEL*PHONE (619) 676 -9110 ] FOR WEEK CERTIFIED INSPECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT JOB NO.�� /z ENDING COVERING WORK PERFORMED ❑ REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY ❑SPRAY - APPLIED FIREPROOFING HICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY PRE - STRESSED CONCRETE ❑ REINFORCED GYPSUM El OTHER HE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF ❑ REINFORCED MASONRY El REINFORCED JOB ADDS S�� ! Z.." C / � u C? ��f BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER PLAN FILE NUMBER CO /•IC/ 3 G OWNER OR PROJECT N E ARCHITECT CONSTR. MAT'L. (TYPE, GRADE, ETC.) DESIGN SOURCE OF MFOR. ENGINEER 7� ST -5-o DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE -BAR GRADE A MFOR., WELD-ROD, ETC.) /r GENERAL CON RACTOR X 68, P 4 „ -!, ,Ocz CONTR. DOING R PORTED WORK 6 l e zl-e LAB. RECEIVING A TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L. SAMPLES _z I SPEC - ARRIVAL DETAILED bN TIME. REPORT OF LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED. TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS. ETC. DATE DEPARTURE WDRK INCLUDES INFORMATION MOIR- AMOLNfE Of MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED; MAIER TYPE & IDEW. NOV. OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN; STRWT. TIME INSPECTED CONNECTKOn(WELD$ MADE, H.T. DOLTS TOROUED) CHECKED; ETC. IiG 7 cl B 7 Clv /"e, // C GX O�G� cs0! tC r 74 / e , - &LJcz l/ e.6v .- e C'__11 /rs �i.bifCr� � ca�e d Zoo rs7lX er' -sc% AUG 2-5 1996 i INSPECTORIRhMMTORmm SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED p 'CERTIFICATE NO. �c�O NORM: ALL MPWTM REPORTS MIST M RIECOWD DY FRIDAY Of THE WEEK POLLOWINO THE N$PEMTION OATH. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of our knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, substantially complies with approved plan specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report covers the locations of the work inspected only and does not constitute engineering opir Ion or project control. PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. (619) 576 -9110 4868 Ronson Court "G" Fax (619) 576 -7028 San Diego, Ca. 92111 • TEST REPORT JOB NO. 2012 JOB HILLSIDE REPAIR ADDRESS 678 NEPTUNE AVENUE PHONE OWNER CONTRACTOR CLIENT GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER NOW MEULMESTER ARCHITECT BLDG. AUTH. _ CITY OF ENCINITAS INSPECTOR DALE REGLI 4283 GI PERMIT NO. PLAN FILE FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN SAMPLE OF: CONCRETE IN JOB OR STRUCTURE: UPPER WALL CAISSONS 1 & 3 MIX NO. 6896P MADE BY DALE REGLI PROPORTIONS 8.96 SACK SLUMP 5 1/2" ADMIXTURE POZZ 322N DATE MADE 8/04/95 • TYPE OF CEMENT II DATE RECEIVED 8/07/95 CONC. SUPPLIER ESCONDIDO READY MIX SOURCE OF ROCK TICKET NO. 1432735 INSPECTOR SIGN LABORATORY TEST DATA AGE TESTED DAYS 7 DAYS 2 8 DAYS 28 DAYS DAYS SPECIMEN MARKINGS 16398 16399 16400 DATE TESTED 8/11 9/01 9/01 AREA - SO. IN. 28.28 28.28 28.28 ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS. 107500 UNIT STRESS - PSI 3800 SPECIFIED STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS - PSI 5000 DISTRIBUTION: GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION DEVIATIONS CITY OF ENCINITAS AUG • TEST METHODS - ASTM C39: C173: C231: C172: C143: C138: C1231: ENGINEER PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. 4888 RONSON COURT "G" t� SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 TELEPHONE (619) 676 -9110 FOR WEEK JOB NO. ENDINGS �� / CERTIFIED INSPECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT zo I Z COVERING WORK PERFORMED A REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY ❑SPRAY - APPLIED FIREPROOFING HICH REQUIRED APPROVAL By ❑ PRE - STRESSED CONCRETE REINFORCED GYPSUM ❑OTHER THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF ❑ REINFORCED MASONRY El REINFORCED JOB ADDRESS 1 . BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER PLAN FILE NUMBER 62.5 �= L ugu �P u c U��q .2c� � OWNER OR PROJECT AME ARCHITECT W l/ '1 ne, CONSTR. MAT'L. (TYPE, GRADESIGN SOURCE OF MFGR. ENGINEER STRENGTH DESCRI (MIX DESK3N, RE -BAR GRADE i MFGR., WELD -ROD, ETC.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR 0 06Z / 11 CONTR DOING REPORTED WORK LAB. RECEIVING A TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L. SAMPLES ISPEC- ARRIVAL DETAILED TiON TIME. REPORT OF LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED. TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED• JOB PROBLEMS. PROGRESS REMARKS. ETC. DATE DEPARTURE WORK INCLUDES NPOTMIATION ABOUT— AMOUNTS OF MATERW. PLACED OR wow PERi01M1ED; NUMBER TYPE A IDEA. NO'S. OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN; STWXT. TIME INSPECTED CO NICTKIFM (WELDS MADE. N.T. SOUS TCTIOUEDI CHECKED; ETC. 0-4 AUG 25 195 INSPECTOR lmaon"Pet SIGNATURE tDATESIGNEDC�9 //U /95'CERTIFICA NO. ,Z�o NOT/; ALL POPGOTTON RIIOITIS MLMT M IIECENID SY NSDAY OF THI WEIX POLLOWP O THE MPtCTM OATIS. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of our knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, substantially complies with approved play specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report covers the locations of the Work inspected only and does not constitute engineering opiK Ion or project control. PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. (619) 576 --9110 4858 Ronson Court "G" San Diego, Ca. 92111 Fax (619) 576 -7028 • TEST REPORT JOB NO. 2012 JOB HILLSIDE REPAIR 678 NEPTUNE AVENUE ADDRESS PHONE OWNER CONTRACTOR CLIENT GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION NOWAK MEULMESTER ENGINEER ARCHITECT BLDG. AUTH. CITY OF ENCINITAS INSPECTOR DALE REGLI 4283 GI _ PERMIT NO. PLAN FILE FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN UPPER WALL 1ST LIFT SAMPLE OF: CONCRETE IN JOB OR STRUCTURE: SOILDER BEAMS MIX NO. 6896P MADE BY DALE REGLI PROPORTIONS 8.96 SACK 7 „ SLUMP ADMIXTURE DAREX, POZZ 8/10/95 DATE MADE • TYPE OF CEMENT II 8/11/95 DATE RECEIVED CONC. SUPPLIER SAN DIEGO READY MIX SOURCE OF ROCK TICKET NO. 6790513 INSPECTOR SIGN LABORATORY TEST DATA AGE TESTED DAYS 7 DAYS 28 DAYS 28 DAYS DAYS SPECIMEN MARKINGS 16422 16423 16424 DATE TESTED 8/17 9/07 9/07 AREA - SQ. IN. 28.28 28.28 28.28 ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS. 138500 UNIT STRESS - PSI 4890 SPECIFIED STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS - PSI 5000 DISTRIBUTION: GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION DEVIATIONS: AUG 2 5 1995 CITY OF ENCINITAS TEST METHODS - ASTF C39: C173: C231: C172: C143: C138: C1231: ENGINEER I PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. 4888 RONSON COURT "0" SAN DIEGO,.CA 92111 TELEPHONE (619) 676 -9110 JOB NO . FOR WEEK `:ERTIFIED INSPECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT �� z E ND ING B / / �- OVERING WORK PERFORMED REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY ❑SPRAY - APPLIED FIREPROOFING WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY El PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE ❑ REINFORCED GYPSUM El OTHER THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF ❑ REINFORCED MASONRY El REINFORCED JOB ADDRESS BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER PLAN FILE NUMBER 28,3 G OWNER OR PROJECT NAM ARCHITECT 0 0 Q e , ^t -,i , � CONSTR. MATL. (TYPE, GRADE, ETC.f DESIGN SOURCE OF MFGR. ENGINEER w. STRENGTH "Ix n ;, ° DESCRIBE T'L (MI_4 DESIGN, RE -BAR GRADE d MFGR., WELD -ROD, ETC. CONT ACTOR . e x O CONT DOI / RE 0 Af t, WORK Al� ^ / � $ � f � LAB. RECEIVING A TESTING CONSTR. MATL. SAMPLES 7 �U e� � , INSPEC- ARRIVAL DETAILED TION TIME, REPORT OF LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED. TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC, DATE DEPARTURE WORK INCLUDES INFORMATION A"ff— AM0VNT8 CW MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED; IMIER, TYPE ✓t EIENT. NO'S. OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN; STRUCT. TIME INSPECTED CC NICTIONS (WELDS MADE. N.T. SOLTS TOROUED) CHECKED; ETC. Z;3U 1 0A j e c 0 -4 -a C/ _S� ~'wdr /- e 0-41 Q Q .-A" r CY S 'do l? C/ 0".t r/ Ao' a r'0'0 /5 ms`s C 0 CIA e-f-sr u-yt d s^ a . ` 7d 3 Ao a A - r � .� � INSPECTOR I~ apt Tym SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED &9 / 4 / 9S CERTIFICATE NOTE: ALL MPSCTION REPMM MUST SE RECOM SV RSOAY OF THE WEEK MUOWM THE NSPVCTM DATE. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of our knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, substantially complies with approved plant specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report covers the locations of the work inspected only and does not constitute engineering opin inn nr nroiart control_ PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. (619).576 -9110 4888 Ronson Court "G" Fax (619) 576 -7028 San Diego, Ca. 92111 TEST REPORT JOB NO. 2012 JOB SLOPE STABILIZATION WALLS AVENUE ADDRESS 678 NEPTUNE PHONE a OWNER CONTRACTOR a' CLIENT GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER NOWAK MEULMESTER ARCHITECT BLDG. AUTH. CITY OF ENCINITAS F DALE REGLI 4283 GI I NS PE CTOR PERMIT No PLAN FILE s .. FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN SAMPLE OF: GROUT MORTAR TUBES IN JOB OR STRUCTURE: TIEBACK #10 3 MIX NO. MADE BY DALE REGLI i PROPORTIONS 4 1/2 GAL /SACK SLUMP ADMIXTURE DATE MADE 6/05/95 TYPE OF CEMENT ,.. DATE RECEIVED 6 /06/95 CONC. SUPPLIER SOURCE OF ROCK t TICKET NO , INSPECTOR SIGN A -- LABORATORY TEST DATA AGE TESTED DAYS 7 DAYS 2 8 DAYS 28 DAYS DAYS f SPECIMEN MARKINGS 15951 15952 15953 DATE TESTED 6/12 7/03 7/03 AREA - SQ. IN. 3.14 3.14 3.14 ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS. 11700 36500 29000 UNIT STRESS - PSI 3675 11620 9240 SPECIFIED STRENGTH 4000 AT 28 DAYS — PSI i DISTRIBUTION: GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION DEVIATIONS: CITY OF ENCINITAS r TEST METHODS - ASTM C39: C173: C231: C172: C143: C138: C1231: ENGINEER PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. (619),576-9110 4888 Ronson Court "G" Fax (619) 576 -7028 'San Diego, Ca. 921.11 TEST REPORT JOB NO. 20 2 I t SLOPE STABILIZATION WALLS t JOB r ADDRESS 678 NEPTUNE AVENUE PHONE OWNER CONTRACTOR i CLIENT GILHO CO NSTR U CTION ENGINEER NOWAK MEULMESTER ARCHITECT BLDG. AUTH. . CITY OF ENCINITAS INSPECTOR DALE REG PERMIT NO. PLAN GI PLAN FILE FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN d SAM OF : GROUT 2" CUBES IN JOB OR STRUCTURE: TIEBACK #10 MIX NO. MADE BY DALE REGLI PROPORTIONS 4 1/2 GAL /SACK SLUMP ADMIXTURE DATE MADE 6/05/95 TYPE OF CEMENT I /II DATE RECEIVED 6/06/95 i CONC. SUPPLIER SOURCE OF ROCK TICKET NO. INSPECTOR SIGN LABORATORY TEST DATA ' AGE TESTED DAYS 5 =? DAYS 2 8 DAYS 28 DAYS DAYS SPECIMEN MARKINGS 15954 15955 15956 DATE TESTED ° / 7/03 7/03 AREA - SQ. IN. 3 .80 3 .82 4.49 t' ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS. 20800 37000 41000 Ar UNIT STRESS — PSI 5470 9690 9130 SPECIFIED STRENGTH 400 AT 28 DAYS — PSI DISTRIBUTION: GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION DEVIATIONS: CITY OF ENCINITAS h' TEST METHODS — ASTM C39: C173: C231: C172: C143: C138: C1231: ENGINEER PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. 4888 RONSON COURT "G " SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 TELEPHONE (619) 676 -9110 FOR WEEK c:ERTIFIED INSPECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT JOB NO. .20 ENDING COVERING WORK PERFORMED ❑ REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY ❑ SPRAY-APPLIED FIREPROOFING WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY ❑ PRE - STRESSED CONCRETE ❑ REINFORCED GYPSUM OTHER — THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF ❑ REINFORCED MASONRY ❑ DEEP FOUNDATION JOB ADDRESS BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER PLAN FILE NUMBER 78 ,4 4 , 0 /I ,- le- OWNER OR PROJECT NA M ARCHITECT S� CONSTR. AT'L. (TYPE, GRADE, ET DESIGN SOURCE OF MFGR. ENGINEER STRENGTH / 1 !J ✓�crcc C�C�C� .IC /YOt Jo DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN. RE -BAR GRADE & MFGR., WELD -ROD, ETC.) GENERAL CONTRACT R / ` o�� / CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK Aft cJc*�b A IX — C Pit! r c t G o . I, / C.JO er LAB. RECEIVING S TESTING CONSTR. MArL. SAMPLES INSPEC- ARRIVAL DETAILED TON TIME. REPORT OF LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED. TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. DATE DEPARTURE WORK INCLUDES NFORMMATION A/OU►- AYOLINTBOFMATEgW.PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED. IMeER TYPE &( OEM. NO11. OF TEST3MIPLES TAKEN; STRUCT. TIME INSPECTED CORNECTWAN (WELDS MADE. N.T. BOLTS TOROLIED) CHMED; M. S C9 Pc /Y ri © �-s Q S1 sp e eA✓v11 t it i - e� G To (3 S c;-c C' or •e C/ S c` f � _ Ir v -W-r !PS i C, i i i INSPECTOR pMwr►oRTYPq SIGNATURE ool DATE SIGNED CERTIFICATE NO. e & O NOR: ALL MPI CTLON REPORTS MIST M Rt6OYI D BY FRIDAY OF THE WEEK POLLOW04 THE INSPECTION DAM. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of our knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, substantially complies with approved plan+' specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report covers the locations of the work inspected only and does not constitute engineering opin ion or proiect control. PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. 4888 RONSON COURT "G "� SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 TELEPHONE (619) 676 -9110 JOB NO. FOR WEEK CERTIFIED INSPECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT o ENDING � COVERING WORK PERFORMED ❑ REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY ❑ SPRAY-APPLIED / FIREPROOFING WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL By ❑ PRE - STRESSED CONCRETE ❑REINFORCED GYPSUM WOTHER / /t'Q2t,,�_ THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF ❑ REINFORCED MASONRY ❑ DEEP FOUNDATION JOB ADDRESS � P � BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER PLAN FILE NUMBER OWNER O 07CT NAME /5 ARCHITECT CONSTR. MAT'L. (TYPE, GRADE, ETC.) DESIGN SOURCE OF MFGR. ENGINE 71 DESCRIBE MAT'L (MIX DESIGN, RE -BAR GRADE 8 MFGR., WELD -ROD, ETC.) GENERAL CONT ACTOR / � �� al y !� AS CONTR. DOING REPORTED WORK LAS. RECEIVING L TESTING CONSTR. MAIL. SAMPLES INSPEC- ARRIVAL DETAILED TION TIME. REPORT OF LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED,TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. DATE DEPARTURE WORK INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT— AMOUNT! OFMATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED: NM/E0. TYPE A IOENT. NOW OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. TIME INSPECTED CONNECTION (WELDS MADE, N.T. BOLTS TOROUEM CHECKED: M. / 0 ec Ae z4zr girls S Z 4 .^ r u OW Al ' i r Qe INSPECTOR (PRRRORTvm ! f L SIGNATURE ` DATE SIGNED 6 I / / S CERTIFICATE NO. NOTE: ALL INSPECTION REPORTS MUST SE MCNVED BY PRDAY OF THE WEEK FOLLOWING THE NSPE n N DATES. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of our knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, substantially complies with approved plan specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report covers the locations of the work inspected only and does not constitute engineering opin PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. (619) 576 -9110 4888 Ronson Court "G" Fax (619) 576 -7028 San Diego, Ca. 92111 TEST REPORT JOB NO. 20 JOB SLOPE STABILIZATION WALLS ADDRESS 678 NEPTUNE AVENUE PHONE OWNER CONTRACTOR CLIENT GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER NOWAK MEULMESTER ARCHITECT BLDG. AUTH. CITY OF ENCINITAS INSPECTOR DALE REGLI PERMIT NO 4283 GI P FI FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN SAMPLE OF: GROUT MORTAR TUBES IN JOB OR STRUCTURE: TIEBACK #10 S. MIX NO. MADE BY DALE REGLI PROPORTIONS 4 1/2 GAL /SACK SLUMP ADMIXTURE DATE MADE 6/05 %95 TYPE OF CEMENT DATE RECEIVED 6 /06/95 CONC. SUPPLIER SOURCE OF ROCK TICKET NO. INSPECTOR SIGN LABORATORY TEST DATA AGE TESTED DAYS 7 DAYS 2 8 DAYS 28 DAYS DAYS SPECIMEN MARKINGS 15951 ` 15952 15953 DATE TESTED 6/12 7/03 7/03 AREA - SQ. IN. 3.14 3.14 3.14 ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS. 11700 UNIT STRESS - PSI 3675 SPECIFIED STRENGTH 4000 AT 28 DAYS - PSI DISTRIBUTION: GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION DEVIATIONS: CITY OF ENCINITAS TEST METHODS - ASTM C39: C173: C231: C172: C143: C138: C1231: ENGINEER PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC. (619) 576 -9110 4888 Ronson Court "G" Fax (619) 576 -7028 .San Diego, Ca. 92111 TEST REPORT JOB NO. 20 " JOB SLOPE STABILIZATION WALLS ADDRESS 678 NEPTUNE AVENUE PHONE OWNER CONTRACTOR CLIENT GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER NOWAK MEULMESTER ARCHITECT BLDG. AUTH. CITY OF ENCINITAS INSPECTOR DALE REGLI PERMIT NO.4 GI PLAN FILE FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN SAMPLE OF: GROUT 2" CUBES IN JOB O R S T RU CT U RE: TIEBACK #10 MIX NO. MADE BY DALE REGLI PROPORTIONS 4 1/2 GAL /SACK SLUMP ADMIXTURE DATE MADE 6/05/95 TYPE OF CEMENT I /II DATE RECEIVED 6/06/95 CONC. SUPPLIER SOURCE OF ROCK TICKET NO. INSPECTOR SIGN LABORATORY TEST DATA AGE TESTED DAYS 5 I DAYS 2 8 DAYS 28 DAYS DAYS SPECIMEN MARKINGS 15954 15955 15956 DATE TESTED 6/09 7/03 7/03 AREA - SQ. IN. 3.80 3 .82 4.49 ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS. 20800 UNIT STRESS - PSI 5470 SPECIFIED STRENGTH 4000 AT 28 DAYS - PSI DISTRIBUTION: GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION DEVIATIONS: CITY OF ENCINITAS TEST METHODS - ASTId C39: C173: C231: C172: C143: C138: C1231: ENGINEER PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL �s Date: 4/04/96 To: City of Encinitas Job. No.: 2012 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Project: 678 Neptune Avenue Encinitas, Ca. 92024 Ci 1 Attention: Hans Jansen C si e_TI2 ice: XTi2z4 Gentlernen: We are sending ® herewith ❑ under separate cover X] By Mail ❑ per your request ❑ per the request of DJ By Messenger ❑ soil reports ❑ Calculations ❑ Plot Plans ❑ Proposals ❑ Correspondence ❑ Contract Documents ® - -Per the request of Jerrold Schnoebelen owner of 678 Neptune Avenu enclosed are test results on the tiebacks tested on 8/03/95 and 9/1 2/95. FOR YOUR: • Review ❑ File • Approval ❑ Use • Distribution ❑ Information ❑ Signature ❑ REMARKS: — BY: CC: (1) Submitted Dale R. Regli 4888 RONSON COURT "G ", SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 • (619) 576 -9110 FAX (619) 576 -7028 "'REFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPEL iNS, INC. 4888 RONSON COURT "G "1 3 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 TELEPHONE (619) 676 -9110 JOB NO. FOR WEEK ENDING t:ERTIFIED INSPECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT A g', COVERING WORK PERFORMED REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY ❑SPRAY - APPLIED FIREPROOFING WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY ❑ PRE - STRESSED CONCRETE ❑ REINFORCED GYPSUM El OTHER THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF ❑ REINFORCED MASONRY ❑DEEP FOUNDATION JOB ADDRESS BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER PLAN FILE NUMBER 7 2 8 3 G OWNER OR PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT 0 0 !l q g r CONSTR. MAT'L. (TYPE. GRADE. ETCf STRENGTH SOURCE OF MFGR. - ENGINEER l� lowc-� DESCRIBE !X TL (Ml.1 DESK3N, RE -SAR GRADE 8 MFGR., WELD -ROD. ETC.) GENERAL CONTRACTOR �(( C / CONTR. DOING ZRPORTED WORK ?,6Q , 6 O L TESTING CONSTR. MAT'L. SAMPLES * 75 --'15'1 Gau P L 8Z /z INSPC-C- ARRIVAL DETAILED TION TIME. REPORT OF LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED. TEST SAMPLES TAKEN. WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS. PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. DATE DEPARTURE WORK INCLUDES NFOIMIATION ABW MOIMrs OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WOW RERFOIMED; NU►SER TYPE A (DENT. NO5. OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN; STRUCT. TIME INSPECTED CONNECTIONS (WELOS MADE, M.T. SOLTS TOROUED) CHECKED; ETC. Z= r t o w s .mil a f Ir .. f AO c7 r m :; a. INSPECTOR (HUNT at SIGNATURE DATE SK3NEO,6 / 1,95 CERTIFICATE NO. I90 NM: ALL INSPECTION REPORTS MIST SS WClIVlD SY PISDAY OF TN! *RIK POLLOWND TIE INSPECTION DATES. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of our knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, substantially complies with approved play specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report covers the locations of the work inspected only and does not constitute engineering opir • r sur�rv� n►R Y s/3�9 -� .�c`� C Cv - 78 /✓��TU��`� .r��' /�►!� TES , ��9- A * .5 - 194e6,6 5 e`er?- C19 /- Ie ig 71 64o , - �iyCiS/Df� /r / Q U� T IDWS �Tif'I �Ntlrzo�S � 1 X <�3 3Z 3� D00 4 y� S� DD�O �z fi9i�,�,t> ) 0';191Z A5 Y� hFo � � ss .LoGC oFf �0 4 3Z ,c�i�S /S - -¢ .c'iPs 15 -s� •s�iPs /S ,� ps 7'0�° /}�Y c�D•eS �, t• 116, //Co /(o 3 a �-o /G 'o oFf PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPEC, NS, INC. , 11888 RONSON COURT "G" SAN DIEGO, CA 82111 TELEPHONE (610) 676 -0110 JOB NO E=FK CERTIFIED INSPECTOR'S WEEKLY REPORT 1 11 170/12- COVERING WORK PERFORMED ❑ REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑STRUCT. STEEL ASSEMBLY ❑ SPRAY-APPLIED FIREPROOFING WHICH REQUIRED APPROVAL BY ❑ PRE- STRESSEDCONCRETE ❑ REINFORCED GYPSUM C3 OTHER r THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF ❑ REINFORCED MASONRY ❑ DEEP FOUNDATION BUILDING PERMrr NUMBER PLAN FILE NUMBER JOB ADDRESS zB 3 7 5 OWNER OR PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT CT ll r CONSTR. MATL. (TYPE, GRADE. ETC.) DESIGN SOURCE OF MFOR. ENGINEER STRENGTH DESCRIBE lATL IMIX (Xy41GN RE- R GRADE i MFGR., WELD -ROD. ETC. IIERK TO C ` CONT NO REPORTEDWORK r'PSSly P LAB. ING i TESTNG CONSTR. MATL. SAMPLES INSPEC- ARRIVAL DETAlLEO DAT TIME. REPORT OF N O A A CT_ E �E S o W� EJE�p p TE 6N". T2i�AM iIITUCw,srnucT. DATE TIDIMPEIRTURE INSPECTED a aaleeTlar (� M ADe, M T. oa,o Twalo �. 9 � r C INSPECTOR ow Too- SIGNATURE • J�.c6 �� / DATE SIGNED 9 1 lZ/ 9S CERTIFICATE NO. MoreAu,Oww" %r om WATM IIi 0gM wrrAWa "g Vogt poUAWM"aWWTIOMCATS. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To the best of our knowledge, all of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, substantially complies with approved pla specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report covers the locations of the work Inspected only and does not constitute engineering opi Inn nr nrniect control. .mac c•} 7�0•✓ � � '� J1�.�.orv � -�� ciNir�s , �°� _ /1/oT.� Ti,� ,ds� CAS /! B•�iP� �.qoM So r .�.c cWGr� T�o �YS J�C a lOZ ' W4 ,t /Y7o v.�/Yl�i1r Ae 1 9, 4 / 9- -Z 5 Z N / Y0 z /C/ W5 '- 6-olelor Q ru� a✓ ly �/. /?�o X �PSSc1 e o /Oco s W-1 /Y� tl,rf/J�I tsiY T f� y D,65 ,16.11 _ &r),e,F /foc v.5 i•Z _ 1 l �z yes y ,S 11 Q /os�o / s so ,s p/ t /�OT� Tj,�BraC.f'S /l�u ,e3•�.P.�D % �M .Sov7'l? �YD W-JZ 4 o cl,�/J�I /� D W1 ,0196 Zi91ips 6 7'Od/OSc I- �GY9�GSG ,21O��SC ,'��SG' .JSO / 7%T,B�� 3 --� .(; .27X �D- S•��r. .s'�,c�a� ��- c�.c�s / 3 yes y 0S 3XI c, 2/00)v .5 C> S1 ?� a G Z 600 S� �!�!G/ - GOSr o� p� 2 ��DS� 1 _ � h ..�•� ice. .s' /�� e � �O ,15'O� s L x: /YOT� Ti,& Bra Cf`S /1�urY1.B �P�D %.qoM sou T fi Y o, ,�.Cc'W6�T /��s li✓C�Uo� W4 14 /�otJ,�/YJGSiYT lz - ,oh'sl d �ocXv�f Ti,�,r� /G - 7S.t : s . .�3 - .(�,os s -o _ Z S/l/os . fa 7 .tom jds r .� � Y zt ye z /� % ///(o D y,TS 3 ` co oz , d Suess c.cK� �' .�o G} ?lo�l/ � �� /Y.r.°Tv�/� j •�i�� /N / � � - Ac5 13 9 /j/Ol -� = Ti,�',�'�c�s /lour►- t',B�iP�I.� r�M Sovrls� ,�',c c 6,� T 1,Y tii.Jc' Y✓.11 /tea v,�flYI r AO b196 G -7c Zo6eol— '7001 71 ,�,B t �'3_s' .rG� 27�t'jos -�D yos'. .,c j of ice- &A. oS i 70L /5s yes 4e 45 7 l C?/J�O Q � .t ct c� � SUl` �ic e Ti � �vc�S• .yd l��y �i�Pw �' `Sells "S u� �� ✓Ji°c°r as �z8o 09 -15- 1995 11 :56AM FROM BO`rLAN INC TO 16195767026 F.02 0 0 I cn o, I e Z li i v� U � w o � re CD " I }•\� lu ch 7 1 o In Q o Q r`e r -- r c, In 44 C C C trl . i C ]. r•i y A f "1 . rn it z cu ��}} m m o m it -R CIS W CG C7 i TOTAL P.02 C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVE. f . ENCINITAS, CA 92024 Ile TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 4283TE PARCEL NO. ,56- 051 -0700 PLAN NO.: 4283 -G JOB SITE ADDRESS: 678 NEPTUNE AVE. APPLICAN NAME 3CHNOEBE (JERROLD F. & LINDA) PHONE NO.: 619 - 535 - 02: MAILING ADDRESS: 678 NEPTUNE AVE. CITY: ENCINITAs STATE: CA ZIP: 92024 - CONTRA GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION PHONE NO.: 619- 481 - 34-.5 LICENSE NO.: 539087 LICENSE TYPE: B INSURANCE COMPANY NAME: GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE CO. POLICY NG, CCP286110 POLICY EXP. DATE: 10/24/95 ENGINEER : SKELLY ENGINEERING P NE N .: 619-942 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 4/24/95 .. PERMIT EXP. DATE: 10/24/95 PERMIT ISSUED BY: INSPECTOR: RON BRADY ------------------------- PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS ---------------------------- 1. PERMIT FEE .00 2. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: 700.00 3. SECURITY DEPOSIT .2,000.00 ------------------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------------------- ACCESS TO JOBSITE ACROSS PUBLIC BEACH. DOCUMENTS INCLUDED: COVENANT RE: GRANT OF BEACH ACCESS /CONTRACTOR LIABILITY LETTER/WORK SCHEDULE /BEACH ACCESS, EQUIPMENT & BARRIER PLANS /STANDARD & SPECIAL CONDITIONS. FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS REQUIRED. - - -- INSPECTION --------------- - DATE -- - - - --- INSPECTOR'q SIGNATURE - - -- INITIAL INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION --------------------------------------------------- I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PER,3 THAT ALL THE INFORMATION I5 TRUE. /.,� zq s� �, ,, , E . u ATE S I GNED S I �J:V A I-AD c? V4 PRINT Nil-ME TELEPHONE NUMBER T, j • 1 i r' F' �' C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 505 S. VULCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 92024 GRADING PERMIT PERMIT NO.: 4283GI PARCEL NOS. 256 -051 -0700 PLAN NO.: 4 — G JOB SITE ADDRESS: 678 NEPTUNE AVE. APPLICANT NAME : SCHNOEBELEN (JERROLD F. & LINDA) MAILING ADDRESS: 678 NEPTUNE AVE. PHONE NO.: 619- 535 CITY: ENCINITAS STATE: CA ZIP: 92024 — CONTRACTOR : GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION PHONE NO.: 619 - 481 - 345 LICENSE NO.: 539087 LICENSE TYPE: B ENGINEER SKELLY ENGINEERING H" NO : 6 9-942 - 837" PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 4/24/95 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 10/24/95 PERMIT ISSUED BY: INSPECTOR: RON BRADY PERMIT FEES & DEPOSITS ---------------------------- 1. PLAN CHECK FEE .00 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT: 1,000.0 2. INSPECTION FEE .00 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT .00 3. PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT: .00 ------------------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION OF WORK ------------------------------- CONSTRUCTION OF SLOPE STABILIZATION WALLS @ ON THE COASTAL BLUFF PER MUP T.B.D. GRADING NOTES ATTACHED. COVENANT RE: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR BLUFF FAILURE, PETITION TO JOIN G.H.A.D. #1, ALL INCLUDED. AS —BUILT PLANS REQUIRED. FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS REQUIRED. COMPLETION OF MAJOR USE PERMIT AS PROCESS REQUIRES. SECURITY DEPOSIT IS 4283TE DAMAGE DEPOSIT. - - -- INSPECTION DATE -- - - - --- INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ---- INITIAL INSPECTION _~ COMPACTION REPORT RECEIVED —= ENGINEER CERT. RECEIVED ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION FINAL INSPECTION , -------------------------------------------------------- .I HEREBY ACY.'NOWLEDc;E THAT I HAVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STATE THAT THE INFORMATION IS CORRECT AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAWS REGULATING EXCAVATING; AND GRADING, AND THE PROVISIONS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION. I GNA??JF.E A I GNED �42 �o ` � �N e16 () � rRINT N TELEPHONE NUMBER I:. y ;GENT :. OTHER PeeQU "C L At 'A f I City Of c Encinitas City of Encinitas City of Encinitas Administrative Services Engineering Services Accounting Division Public Service counter ENGINEERING APPLICANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES The City of Encinitas Engineering Services Department maintains a "Cost Recovery" System for the resources used in providing development services requested by an applicant. Actual staff time and accounts payable expenditures are recorded to an' assigned project code for each applicant requested service. A 67% administrative overhead surcharge is also applied to all services. Applicants are also requested to provide deposit amounts based on guidelines approved in City ordinances. The deposit will be used to offset charges being allocated to a project. If the initial applicant deposit exceeded the service charges, a refund for the difference will be remitted. Additional funds may be requested in the future if the initial deposit payment was insufficient. If an applicant does not respond to a request for additional funds, a stop Work order will be issued for their project. Completing a development project in a timely manner is essential in minimizing the amount of service charges. Plan checking charges are dependent on the quality of the submitted plans as well as responses to document corrections. Upon permit issuance, inspectors will perform periodic visits to evajuate site improvements. If plan check costs exceed deposits, the applicant shall pay the outstanding balance prior to permit issuance. If inspection costs exceed deposits, the applicant shall pay the outstanding balance prior to release of the security deposit. Public improvement projects (i.e., road construction, sewer main extension, etc.) require the retention of a 25% warranty of the project cost estimate for a one -year period following the date of acceptance. If you have any questions regarding this procedure, please call -the Engineering public service counter at 633 - 2779/2780. m13363 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas. California 92024 -363 TEL 619- 633 -2600 FA,K 019 -033 -262.' TDD 619- 633 -2700 recycled paper ------ ------- ------- -------- q:4 NJ -41 . ....... ... . ti . K... NNO PLAN GE NER A L a r NOTES FOR pERMIT No' 42.83 GI _ City Of (MUP T. B. D.) `J Encinitas WORK TO BE DONE A. GENERAL 1. All work shall be done in accordance with these plans, the standard specifications for public works construction, the design construction standards of the City of Encinitas and the San Diego area regional standard drawings. Any changes or revisions therefrom shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any request for inspection. 2. The soil reports titled Geologic Reconnaissance, Residential Property, 678 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, California, prepared by Michael W. Hart, Engineering: Geologist, dated February, 6, 1995, and Preliminary Review of Slope Failure, Residence Located at 678 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, California, prepared by Accutech Engineering .Systems, Inc., dated January 17, 1995, .shall be .considered as a part of this grading plan. All grading shall be done in accordance with the recommendations and specifications contained in said report. 3. Approval,of this plan does not constitute approval of sizes, location and type of drainage facilities, nor of improvements within street right -of -ways. Separate approvals and permits for these shall be required in conjunction with improvement plans. 4... Written permission shall be obtained for any off - site grading. 5. Contractor shall take any necessary precautions required to protect adjacent properties during grading operations. Anything damaged or destroyed shall be teplaced or repaired to condition existing prior to grading. 6. The developer shall be responsible that any monument or bench mark which is disturbed or destroyed shall be re- established and replaced by a registered civil engineer or a licensed land surveyor. pol4566 1 1'FI (,1 2600 FAX 019 -0i - 202- I uc 1.n<uIIIaI' t..iII r i _' 2 i i��`�'� I'I�I� � (iii > - IN) rpCVCledpape, 7. The contractor shall design, construct and maintain all safety devices, including shoring, and shall be responsible for conforming to all local, state and federal safety and health standards, laws and regulations. S. Grading and equipment operating within 1/2 mile of a structure for human occupancy shall not be conducted between the hours of 5:30 p.m. and 7:30 a.m. nor on Saturdays, Sundays and City recognized holidays unless in conformance with a work schedule approved by the Director of Engineering Services and Superintendent of Parks and Beaches. 9. No grading operations shall commence until a pregrading meeting has been held onsite with the following people present: Engineering Inspector, Assistant Planner, Lifeguard Supervisor, Civil Engineer, Soils Engineer, Grading Contractor, and Permittee. The pregrade meeting shall be scheduled with the City at least 48 hours in advance by calling (619) 633 -2770. 10. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation. 11. Upon final completion of the work under the grading permit but prior to final grading approval and /or final release of security, an as- graded certification shall be provided stating: "The grading under Permit No. 4283 GI has been performed in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan or as shown on the attached as- graded plan ". This statement shall be followed by the date and signature of the Civil Engineer who certifies such grading operation. B. NOTIFICATIONS 1. The existence and location of underground utility pipes and structures shown on these plans were obtained by a search of available records. To the best of our knowledge there are no existing utilities except as shown on these plans, however: The contractor is required to take due precautionary measures to protect any existing pol4566 2 utilities or structures located at the work site. It is the contractor's responsibility to contact the following owners of said utilities or structures prior to any excavation, for verification and location of utilities and notification of commencement of work: a. Sewers - Encinitas Sanitary District b. Gas & Electric - San Diego Gas & Electric Co. C. Water - San Dieguito Water District d. Telephone - Pacific Bell e. Cable TV - Dimension Cable Services, Daniels Cablevision. These companies may be notified by calling 1- 800 -422 -4133. 2. Contractor shall notify the City Engineer's office 48 hours prior to beginning any work on this project. Phone: (619) 633 -2770. 3. The contractor shall give 24 hours notice on calls for inspection. Phone: (619) 633 -2770. All work performed without benefit of inspection will be subject to rejection and removal. C. GRADING - 1. All grading shall be observed and- tested by a - qualified soils engineer or under his /her direction. He /She shall observe and test the excavation placement and compaction of fills and backfills and compaction of trenches. He /She shall submit soils reports as required and will determine the suitability of any fill material. Upon completion of grading operations he /she shall state that observations and tests were made by him /her or under his /her supervision and that in his /her opinion, all embankments and excavations were constructed in accordance with the approved grading plans and that all embankments and excavations are acceptable for their intended use. pol4566 3 2. The contractor shall properly grade all excavated surfaces to provide positive drainage and prevent ponding of water. He /she shall control surface water and avoid damage to adjoining properties or to finished work on the site and shall take remedial measures to prevent erosion of freshly graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. 3. All areas to be filled shall be prepared to be filled and fill shall be placed in accordance with standard specifications. All vegetable matter and objectionable material shall be removed by the contractor from the surface upon which the fill is to be placed. Loose fill and alluvial soils shall be removed to suitable firm natural ground. The exposed soils shall be scarified to a depth of 6" and then compacted to a minimum of 90 percent. It shall be the contractor's responsibility to place, spread, water and compact the fill in strict accordance with specifications. 4. Cut and fill slopes shall be cut and trimmed to finish grade to produce smooth surfaces and uniform cross sections. The slopes of excavations and embankments shall be shaped, planted and trimmed as directed by the engineer of work and left in a neat and orderly condition. All stones, roots and other waste matter exposed or excavation or embankment slopes which are liable to become loosened shall be removed and disposed of. The toe and top of all slopes shall be rounded in accordance with the Grading Ordinance. 5. All trees, brush, grass, and other objectionable material shall be collected, piled- - or - otherwise disposed of off the site by the contractor so as to leave the areas that have been cleared with a neat and finished appearance free from unsightly debris. Approval of location of debris fill shall be secured from the soils engineer and City Engineer prior to the disposal of any such material. D. EROSION CONTROL 1. In case emergency work is required, contact:. M EE riHt� pol4566 4 2. Equipment available workers a all times during r shall made a the rainy va season. All necessary materials shall be stockpiled on site at convenient locations to facilitate rapid construction of temporary devices when rain is imminent. 3. Devices shown on plans shall not be moved or modified without the approval of the Engineering Inspector. 4. The contractor shall restore all erosion control devices to working order to the satisfaction of the City Engineer after each run -off producing rainfall. 5. The contractor shall install additional erosion control measures as may be required by the City Engineer due to an uncompleted grading operation or unforeseen circumstances which may arise. 6. The contractor shall be responsible and shall take necessary precautions to prevent public trespass onto areas when impounded waters create a hazardous condition. 7. All erosion control measures provided per the approved grading plan shall be incorporated hereon. 8. Graded areas around the project perimeter must drain away from the face.of slope at the conclusion of each work day. 9. All removable protective devices shown shall be in place at the end of each working day when the 5 day rain probability forecast exceeds 40 %, Silt and other debris shall be removed after each rainfall. 10. Should germination of hydroseeded slopes fail to provide effective coverage of graded slopes (90% coverage) prior to November 15, the slopes shall be stabilized with punched straw installed in accordance with Section 35.023 of the Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook of the State of California Department of Conservation. pol4566 5 GRADING PLAN CERTIFICAT F01t PERMIT NO . `� 18 MUP T . B . D . ) SOILS ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE II r I, �,� �i� SKe 1 l y - a registered civil engineer in the State of California, principally doing business. in the field of applied soil mechanics, hereby certify that a sampling and study of the soil conditions prevalent within this site was made by me or under my direction between the dates Zaj LO I and i One complete copy of the soils report compiled from this study, with my recommendations, has been submitted to the office of the City Engineer. Furthermore, I have reviewed these grading plans and certify that the recommendations included in the soils report for this project have been incorporated in the grading plans and ecifica / tion SIGNED: "' RCE NO.: 7 EXP. DATE: I OWNERS CERTIFICATE I (WE) HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A REGISTERED SOILS ENGINEER OR GEOLOGIST HAS BEEN OR WILL BE RETAINED TO SUPERVISE OVER ALL GRADING ACTIVITY AND DVISE ON THE COMPACTION AND STABILITY OF THE SITE. Signature Date DECLARATION F RESPONSIBLE CHARGE ` I HEREBY DECLARE THAT I AM THE ENGINEER OF WORK FOR TH: S PROJECT, THAT I HAVE EXERCISED RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OVER THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6703 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE, AND THAT THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHECK OF PROJECT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS BY THE CITY OF ENCINITAS IS CONFINED TO A REVIEW ONLY AND DOES NOT RELIEVE ME, AS ENGINEER OF WORK, OF MY RESPONSIBILITIES FOR PROJECT DESIGN. S. C ✓fC-' (NAME, DDRESS & F� Crr n1S CA ci2o 2 TELEP NE NO. OF ENGINEER OF WORK) (,f S gy2 �3 7� Signatures Da e RCE NO.: l EXP . DATE ! pol3846 7 City of Encinitas COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS BEACH ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 4283TE 1. Permittee shall provide a Certificate of Public Liability Insurance with the City of Encinitas listed as an additional insured in the amount of $1,000,000. 2. Permittee shall post a Financial Deposit Instrument from a Financial Institution approved by the City, in the amount of $2,000.00 prior to entering upon City Property, to ensure all terms and conditions of the Permit are fully met. 3. Permittee shall deposit to the City the sum of $700.00 for the use of City Property. This deposit will be used to pay for the cost of inspecting the City Property. 4. Permittee shall provide a detailed plan, which must be approved by the City prior to the Permittee entering upon City Property. The plan shall include times the City Property will be used, types of vehicles which will be used, the number of trips vehicles will make. Work Schedule received April 24, 1995 Equipment List received April 24 1995 Beach Access Plan received April 24 1995 5. A notarized letter shall be provided, indicating the Construction Contractor will be liable for any costs to correct damages to the Public Beach or adjacent areas resulting from the Contractor's work. Also included in the letter __shall be a statement of understanding that debris washing ontp- -the Beaches - within one mile north or south of the job site is assumed to be construction debris and shall be removed by the Contractor at no expense to the City. Construction debris is defined as lumber, piling, poles, crates, boxes, containers, and other objects which could be used for construction similar to that being used on the site. Debris also includes any pre- existing items excavated at the site such as re -bar, concrete and bricks. Document received 1995. 6. Permittee shall present a Beach Barrier Plan to protect the public from equipment movement, construction activity _and construction site. Document received April 24, 1995 The Engineering Inspector may request changes to the Plan on as- needed basis. bp4117 Il`i t,I(, - (,ii 0)d 1 FAX l 194,33 2t,2 :m iti(. 1.1ii(init;i. (:iIilnrtu:,') 'ti?•1 "1'1)1 �3 _ recvcled paper P 4283TE Conditions - Page 2/4 7. The storage status of Contractor equipment within the City limits shall be determined and the location mutually agreed upon prior to access to the Public Beach. Use of Corporation Yards for storage shall be negotiated directly with the Director of Public Works separately from any Permit processing; compensation will be due the City. 8. A solid waste container of sufficient size shall be made available and conveniently accessible to Lifeguard Services so that debris removed from the Public Beach may be immediately and safely stored. This container shall be lockable with a duplicate key given to the Lifeguard Supervisor. Permittee shall be responsible for regular monitoring, maintenance and cleaning of this facility. 9. Permittee shall obtain special permission from the City Council for access and use of the Public Beach on City- recognized Holidays, Sundays, and, between the hours of 7:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M., Mondays through Saturdays, per Chapter 9.32 of the Municipal Code. 10. Advanced notifications shall be provided to the office of the Lifeguard Supervisor (619) 633 -2748, a minimum of 48 hours prior to each access period through Moonlight . Beach State Park. Notification shall include date(s), time(s), equipment types and duration of work. A single notification shall not include more than one week of work at any given time. 11. The access and use of any Contractor vehicle on the Public Beach shall be approved by the Engineering Inspector and Lifeguard Supervisor immediately prior to such access. 12. Permittee shall delineate the accessway through Moonlight Beach State Park to the satisfaction of the Engineering Inspector and Lifeguard Supervisor. When children are present, flagmen will be required to route Contractor traffic. Special consideration will be given when crowds are present, including prohibitio -a - of access. 13. Permittee shall not block at any time access to the Public Beach for emergency personnel or vehicles. 14. The operation of Contractor vehicles while on the Public Beach shall be conducted in a reasonable, safe and prudent manner. 15. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site to which access is authorized by this Permit, the permittee shall submit to and receive approval from the Traffic Engineering Division for the proposed haul route. The permittee shall comply with all conditions and requirements the Traffic Engineering Division may impose with regards to the hauling operation. bp4117 e , 4283TE Conditions - Page 3/4 16. Prior to placement of any concrete product at the base of the coastal bluff, the permittee shall indicate to the Engineering Inspector what methods are to be used to dewater the job site. 17. Staging or repairs of equipment or supplies is prohibited on City Property or right -of -ways. Parking of personal vehicles on the Public Beach will not be allowed. Offending vehicles will be cited and towed. 18. Any entrance gates used to gain access through the Publc Beach area shall be immediately locked after access. Any ruts or berm damage to sand areas shall be immediately and repeatedly repaired to remove any public safety hazards. 19. Permittee shall restore or replace on a daily basis any signage regulating handicap person's access, or any other signage, disrupted, damaged or destroyed by permittee's operations. Permittee shall repaint and restripe pavement markings as needed. 20. The proposed winter season berm and drainage system of Moonlight Beach State Park, when constructed, shall be maintained in good working order on a continuous basis, and any breach to the berm due to the operations of the permittee shall be properly filled or sandbagged before the end of the current low tide period. Any sand loss or damage resulting from the failure to maintain the winter berm will be at the expense of the Contractor to restore or repair, respectively. 21. Permittee shall remove debris from the Public Beach on a daily basis or within the maximum period of twenty -four hours from when requested to do so by the Lifeguard Supervisor or Engineering .Inspector, whichever occurs first.. 22. On Fridays preceding weekends when Special - Ajct:rvities are scheduled at Moonlight Beach State Park, Permitter -shall cease operations and remove all equipment and personnel from the Public Beach by 5:00 A.M. All roadways, ramps and walkways shall be swept clean. 23. Prior to final inspection approval of this permit by the Superintendent of Parks and Beaches, permittee shall regrade the Public Beach to the contours existing prior to issuance of this permit with the exception of the seawall itself. Permittee shall also repair damage to and thoroughly clean the asphalt pavement along the access route. bp4117 u a i 4283TE Conditions - Page 4/4 24. Prior to final inspection approval of this permit by the .Superintendent of Parks and Beaches, permittee shall either replenish all Public Beach sand lost due to permittee's operations or compensate the Parks and Beaches Division by contributing to future sand replenishment projects. 25. Permittee shall direct all communications regarding this Permit through the Engineering Inspector, except as otherwise stated in these Conditions. City shall assume no responsibility for instructions received or given outside this "chain of command ". 26. Violations of any Standard or Special Condition will result in notification of the Sheriff's Department for appropriate action. A Stop Work Order on the Permit will be immediately issued by the Engineering Inspector or Lifeguard Supervisor. 27. These conditions do not exempt the Contractor or Agency of any future fees or charges for access through the Beach area. 28. Permittee has read, understands and agrees to comply with all Beach Encroachment Permit Standard and Special Conditions: S (Sign tur ermittee) (Date) (Name of Permittee Printed) (Position Title) bp4117 s CITY OF ENCINITAS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Community Services Staff FROM: Jesse Tench, Park and Beach Superintendent DATE: April 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Beach Area Improvements and Maintenance Notices The following work will be performed at various beach locations: Moonlight Beach May 01 -05 "B" Street Cul -De -Sac improvements Existing disabled parking will be improved to meet ADA requirements. Work includes removal and installation of new concrete curbs, ramps and driveway within the cul -de -sac. Work is expected to be completed during this week. May 15 -20 Annual Sand Replenishment The winter storm berm will be graded down. Approximately 925 tons of new sand will be imported and graded over the week period. May 22 -25 Asphalt Sealing and Striping The asphalt of the upper parking lot, B & C Street cul -de -sacs, and interior walkways and driveways will be sealed and restriped. The twgL cul -de -sacs will receive design changes to provide passenger drop -off areas, two -way entry /exit -, circular - traffic flows. Work will be completed the Thursday before the Memorial Day Weekend. This work will take 2 -3 days and may require no vehicle traffic and limited pedestrian access. A 72 -hour no parking notice will be posted in areas affected by work. Other Beach Areas Apr 24 - Spring Beach Debris Cleanup May 15 Bids are be gathered for this cleanup work. As soon as a contractor is selected, the work would scheduled based on best tides. ,r 3 May 01 -25 Asphalt Sealing and Striping Swami's and Beacon's access parking areas will also received seal and stripe work. This areas will be schedule during this period with the 72 -hour no parking notices being posted in areas affected by work. This information is provided for your reference. If you have any conflicts with any work that is being planned, please let me know immediately so I may attempt to meet your requests. t APR -24 - 95 MON 15:22 Robert F. Driver Co. Inc FAX N0. 6196991327 Pr Ol Rf !• <l' " .i LSlU[ OAT[ DKIVDD/YYl < � � ( 5 % y � . "xz > = " !�•.�•• y� aawr�i X77 � / n 4/24/93 PRODUCER ricopitmw TIFICA m v up= AO A MAT rm of DrPORM1ATION ONLY AND RIGUN UPON TIM CtR'I ltCATE HOLDM TMS CERTIIICATC T AMIa'm. EZTfirD OR ALTER THZ COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE S &ILLOW ROBERT F DRIVER CO.. INC. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE 1620 STK AVENUE COMPANY LETmIt A GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY SAN DIEGO. CA 92101 -2703 COWANY LE'Irm aauuD coaQANY C Gilholln ConscucooD LETTTat Bob Oithoim DBA COMPANY LETTER D 933 Suufocd Drive Encinitas CA 92024.4352 E <>•. >: >.t <YM «;±'fyw a.� � y a/ yr++•> ziir > > f fXt;.'k'� :YSY2Si <`5. "a a TO CERTIFY THAT Tilt Pouct d of INSURANCE Lmw "LOW HAWS BM XWED TO Tw IIGURLD NAMED ABOVE FOR Tm POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITffiTANDDYG ANY REQVIREMOiNrr TT K OR MCCISTTON OI ANY C0MUCT OR VrM= DOCUIMENT WITH '"PEI-7 TO WH= TtWS CERTMCATE MAY u ISM= an N1AY PERTAlK, T= Q4VRAMQ AFFORDED By tDE FOLIC}!S DLSCRDIED IaREIIV D lUBJER.T TO AEI. TIDE FIRM!!. ZXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SOCK POIJCDTI L84M BROWN MtAY RATE REEN RLDNCLD BY PAID CLAt ' tom. TYPE Of llil cz, POILWY NUS DATEOOt1DD/YY1 DATE@W/DDIY4) Tit 1000000 GENERAL LI•BItirY 10/24/94 10/24/93 G>tNtstAL AGGRLCATt A CCP286110 000 PROD40WMF A M 1000 X COMAL GENERAL uAuLrff CLAWS MARS ®�- ML ADr. nwRY 1000000 LACR OCCURIAMM 1 > OWNER's A NT CORACT'S PROT FIRM DAMA E(Oat FWd lonm OVA 5000 AUtON08[LE LIABILITY COMBDVED SINGLE LaAIT ANY AUTO ALL OWNID AUTOS O' BODILY aaNUAY >w P�efwl SCHEDULED Wras Itlua AVIOS post-it' Fax Note 7871 0 iti 3 P�� BODILY WvRY To C u n f From & n l G� MW ILI 400 NON -OWNED AUTOS l S rl GARAGE LIABILITY COJOSPL Co. b f p PstorltaTY DAMAGE Phone A Phone 4 �C 1 LAQ{OCCURAiNCi p sxcm LIABILITY p Fax t q 3 - UM B R6LLA FORM �' AGGAB6ATL =: T�R THAN UMBRELLA I F EE LiMTIS WORKERS' COYIPSNSATION EAC DISELIMrT EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY DISEASE LACii EMP. OTHER DESCRIPTION OP OPERATIONS ILOCATIONS /VIEMCLxws IC1AL ITEM Re: Job for Jerry Schnobelen, 678 Neptune. Leucadia, CA 92024 1 DAYS NOTICE FOR NON - PAYMENT OF PREMIUM CER'ri Fit rs�.s:.::Y LDE�"::�•;w..... a SHOULD ANY W THE ABOVE D63CRgtD POLICIES BC CANCELLED WORE TILL PXpIRATTON DATE TREREOf. THE LSSUWO COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 3n• DAYS WRITTEN NO H TICE TO THE CCRTInCAT[ OLDEA NAMED TO TN[ City of Encinitas LEIr. SU'r TAiLURL TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SH IMPOSE NO O5L'GAT10N OR Aim: Engineering Services LIABILITY Of ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY. ITS AGENTS OR RSPRLSENTATIVES• SOS S. Vulcan Ave. AUTIIORIZ REMMENTATIYZ t Encinitas: CA 92024 �•ACOJtD•2S•5;47<gOT -`,� . �,.,..;5a::;;:;•.'... -__ Inc - + FAX N0. 6196991327 P. 01 APR -24 -95 MON 16:07 Rober F . Driver Co. COMMERCIAL GENERAL UAB t Y (POLICY NUMBER: CCP286110 Gilholm Constr. iT CAREFULLY THIS END ORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ - ADDITIONAL INSUREDVS TATE OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISIO NS--PERMITS S rnodifws insurance provided under the following: ` This endorsemen t COMMERCIAL GENERAL UA6iL" COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Stste or Political SubdIVIS City of Encinitas Attn: Engineering Services 505 S. VulcanAve- Encinitas, CA 92024 (If no entry appears above, be shown in the Declarations information required to complete this en d o rsement will as applicable to this endorsement.) nticoi subdivision shown in WHO IS AN INSURED (Section 11) Is amended to include as an insured any state or Po rovisions: It whi This insurance applies only with respec the state the Schedule. subject to the following p 1. to operations performed by you or on your �� for or p subdivision has issued a permit. y This insurance does not apply to: arising out of operations •� •` rso a. "Bod nal injury" or "advertising injury ily inlury,'...property damage. Pe performed for the state or municipality: or products operations hazard: b. "Bodily injury" or "property damage" included within t he ' P p Fax Note 7671 Data Z �� From n To Gard .vLC. Phorm r 3 — D-`7 g 0 Fax r 33-a -g i c Copyright. Insurance services Office- Inc., 198 CG 2012 1185 C4 ra\ vN -- � N 6 Aj UAJ - - �- - - ---- fro'- ^=---- ��-- �-- _� -�� --------------- - - - - -- ___- - - - -- -�= - -` -UA - - - -- `?vas- -- - -- - ----------- _ perM� � �-- �� fi�r�v_ - - -.� ----- ��1w - DNS _�_ �✓.- _--------- -_ - - -- �� C %1 �� - Cam �r��- f�.✓._ Reco_ .�,z� - - -��f - c��vst'r- 1 row - ode brb _ w4s4 ND - ova -- rc he � �/l f %S C�IIS�CI �'' G P/dJ 13 L flV!V_ -. Ar le._ .! r o! CjWFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of County of � �� - /J On i'7 s before me, �jgjl�it7A C� yAP Name and Title of Officer (e.g., liana Doe. Notary PubYlf) to personally appeared 4rsonally NNarrate) of S9100) known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of tisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name( re subsch the within instrument and ac ledged to me tha h he/they executed the hi rttheir authorized capac(ty(ies), and that by ................• er r signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), Rands G. Milijour or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, comfn. #1038151 executed the instrument. - w Note �M Own. Ev Jw, 6, 190 WITNESS my hand and official seal. of Notary OPTIONAL Though the information below is no fra u d ulent re oby law, reattachment of valu form r document and could prevent another document Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Top of thumb here El Other: Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: 0 1994 National Notary Association •8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91309.7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1- 800.876.8827 U �"_1__ � -y X4..7`' • _ - -_ _ _ __ i - -- _ - -- - -- on . Z t1i t-I _ c y 'x H H (!� 0 W, - -- - - SERA ICES _ CA � z Im CITY ENCINITAS � � �� ,� 1 /L VA WA CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: J�4� PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION• PERMIT NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: TELEPHONE: , iY m14429 CITY OF ENCINITAS - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: PROJECT NAME: ` PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: R.O.W. NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: l G �- 14 4 4n tf ' r , �/ � ✓ ! ,✓C o af P �� . i �;,, ,, ! �;, �` , �:_, •,,•^'�. _ -�� ;a j� o hAlAA Bw /04 /MS1 -381wp (1 -1 -IIII) CITY OF ENCINITAS -ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ,ACTIVITY REPORT DATE: ` PROJECT NAME• U/ /y PROJECT NUMBER: STREET LOCATION: /C" R.O.W. NUMBER: CONTRACTOR: - PHONE: G . f � v Aj - �� CIS !� G �� 1 ✓ _ r r �GG 5411 G� a BW /04 /MSl -3II1wP (•1- •1 -IIII) - , ," 4 PR�FEAAEQ CONSTRUCTION INSPECTlONB, INC- 4888 RON30N COURT "Q . FpR G SAN 01FOO, CA 02111 TELEPHONE (610) 6764M .IOB NO, £ND 1 c; I ERTiF1Eri NSPECT4F�'S WEEKLY �tEPOi�Y COVERING N PERFORMED ❑ 9EINFORCE0 CONCRETE ❑STRUCT. STEEL ASSEWLy ❑ SPRAY-APPLIED FIREPROOFNG ❑ PRE•STRESSEDCONCRETE t] REINFORCED GYPSUM ❑OTHER - WHICH REOUIRED APPROVAL By DEEP 1HE SPECIAL INSPF TOR OF ❑REINFORCED6JtASONRY ❑ AN FILENUu"R gUtLOM�(1 PER ?UIQ M9ER � JOB AODR�3 _ - - -- - - 'Z ITECT OwN SECT E d R CONSTR, MATL (TYPE, GRADE, ETC.) DESIGN SOUS W UFGFL ENO STRENGTtd DE3CAi9£ 4 AT'L (MIX 9fGk RE gAA GRAOE t 1AFG WELDROO, ETC OE CON D03 Rf 0 WORK -, _ p 1tey kq i T WQ OON$TR. UATL. SAMPLES INSPEC- ARRIVAL TAILED LOCATION OF WQAK INSPECTED, TEST S�AtALES TAKEN. WOR REJ ECTED. JOS PAOSLEMS• PROGA S& REVARK4, ETC. TON TUE. kEPORT OF DATE pEPARTI;AE WORK ► � avoa: N ► aw ua�. �-. uFOUr r>, oEwtenw, rl. �. ctoonwshcwro a+ tR µ � tirmr, nr+ rt. NOS.orTUia+a++ TIME WORK TED WA0t, x.t. &Ccn IC "CI C✓ CKID; M, \d ''n - a �( .� �_� �►oa 0 4199 e I. 5E GiT`( CF!� „ *4PECT0R Mw w Tvep E IdNATURf: .e1� ce- 4 / Wt Spa i / ��cElV�TV NO, ��D UM Au. odowy n� VXT ed I0 K ►noAy Or ne W w r=0*04 wrecT,w IWO. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: To Iha best of our knowledge, all of the reported worts, unless olherwISe noted, substantially complies with Approved pla soeciticalions and aoolicable sections Of IhA hulHinn rnrlA.%. Thi4 rannd rnvam Iha Inralinnc rd Iha L' Ine AlIarl 111 ova ate... ^ ^^ ^^ '^ - Jow Y s �OCUi'�SL t ll )o il- .Q 01-1064I.YZ - 2 1:: - 1 1 7 � .�! "• -.. . ^....= �- � =_ .� �.__:,CJ F.� .�~�SS'CL / � ,l.!. =V __� P M _ V - \ S �~ A / K 4:.�V .f,�... ].r. �K cr.. . �. J-C�t <!.�(...1J01r1..�r�SS_.Gl. /�{ G �_ � 1. �.5� G - � °C-�c�.� � r"�`•. r Y .tea �� Y�•� •c - L11�,�,� � �o �� -14 & s CX /s r os yes yes yes a I s Z2 �o cry 7 vi✓ !'gym 6 � /Y ,. / 9 4 z` j os Z C S C2 �� W 41 4 �� l w � o•�d JD ,OSG /7SOf 3 :Z (� 00 .� 5 .�SDC��S G /is�yS• �i �/�, pit' /'!a - 7� � s .�.� --� ,N�s ,S'D -7_ S�yS. l 7•t' 21 yes i y �S 3 � 8 Zo C 7 D .Scu rif c 4 u �> 4 W4 4 �o urn FiY r r C ,1 7irB�i CIA '' �3- 't% /� �t'j°s -�D - S ,s-�s . .•jai ��• �.r� s . -5z y o T - 77 -2 -4 -------------- P —i -------- — 7 ! LO z ri V] C 2 z . . : �,, '2, Z X11 Y. r t f n '� v �� c o' ^ f ' ) V � r� � U� V3 oc I rl _rMTAl From: Diane Langager To: RBRADY,JGARAMI Date: 7/3/96 4:08pm Subject: SCHNOEB_ELEN SEAW I SPOKE WITH BILL WEED MAN, AND HE AGREED ME THAT YOU ARE NOT O H PERMIT OR SIGN OFF ON SCHNOEBELEN SEAWALL. CITY HAS ISSUE WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR MAJOR USE PERMIT. PLEASE SEND ME A COPY OF HIS LETTER AND SOILS REPORT. IF HE HAS CONCERNS WITH THIS; YOU SHOULD HANDLE IT; THIS ISSUE IS AN ENGINEERING ISSUE AS WELL AS A PLANNING ISSUE. IF HE HAS QUESTIONS WITH PROCESSING THE MUP APPLICATION HE CAN CONTACT BILL WEEDMAN. THANKS DIANE CC: BWEEDMAN, AARCH, SHOLDER is t r r \ � a► J t� , \ Q�x N SAN DIE ;UffO ved ufMONAi DANK MEMBER F.D.LC. MATURE CERTIFICATE NOTICE - DATE CE.PT ON X00330 CERT AMOUNT 2000.00 _DAATE O� RI9b NE IF YOUR ACCOUNT T��:NEWS. IT WILL B INVESTED � SA M . RATE TER AT T HE CURRENT I NTEREST RATE, THE C R E_ T AND ANNUAL PEKCENTAGE YIELD HAVE NOT YET BEEN DETERMINED. FOR THIS INFU�-MAT IONe PLEASE CALL (6"! 9)436 - 5226 OR 7 0 -9300. MATURITY DATE 07/17'/96 LINDA L JE.R'ROLU F SCHNUEBELEN E T ATU I TY DA PAYABLE TU CITY OF E.NCINITAS 10/15!96 171 T T" !J 9 4 8 1 TYPE: B 1-1 L3 7 i. L D i__!LE ICE EEP. DA P 1 E I AV "D r T R '-;YET LY El 12,31T P E - f-P • E j)lkTE. -4 RON Bp,'_�,Dy uST - --- ----- ------------------ ----------------- FEE S' & S' DEP IT:' ERMIT FEE "IT 7 0 0 10 0 .00 ' CT TP. 1 000 Vf DEPf f�SIT N I VKIPY - ----------------------------- I PT i L) T RE: B I DED LIC !En(7.!H. DOCUREVITS1 U _'HEDULE/ 'EACH TO L '-I I.. i Y LEr c" - LIADIL T S. All F El E CH C' E' ,. UJIDAPD .777.1"L. . ECITUIPMENT & I / " j jai DPPROVAL;u' RD -PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK- T L DiTE ARRANGE FOR NS - PEC 11 1 N P E f - -'T I BY CALLlN.G__- (619) 633- ----- LEAST 71'T N E T I ------------- Fy . TN 'DY CERT Fy F i-E ..,'AP:EFt3LUj E]KAMIlTED THE, ETD PEldlqlT ALL THE jlTw.,EdAlZkTlC' !S, TP ,..' .. fir,. �.. _,w,_.,._._.__� w.__ � �-�• � % - F pEP,!UP_Y THA.T 1.)ATEE TRE , czv�6 19 k-7 iZ -T E E :3 F, L - 4 A. JIZE F • • City Of Encinitas December 31, 1996 San Dieguito National Bank 135 Saxony Road Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Beach Encroachment Permit 4283TE 1678 Neptune Av /Schnoebelen, Jerrold F. & Linda L.1 A.P.N. 256- 051 -07 Release of damage deposit Final inspection of Permit 4283TE, authorizing access across the public beach to a jobsite on adjacent private property, has been concluded to the satisfaction of the Field Operations Division, Engineering Services Department. Therefore, release of the damage deposit is merited. Certificate of Deposit S 3308, issued April 24, 1995, and in the amount of $2,000.00, has been endorsed by the City's Finance Manager and released to your office for payment to the depositor. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Jeff Garami, in writing, or by fax at (619) 633 -2818. Sincerely, �O Hans C Jensen Senior Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering cc Leslie Suelter, Financial Manager Jerrold Schnoebelen (point of delivery) enc HCJ /isg,/4283TE.doc 1 TEL 619 - 633 -2600 i FAx 619 - 633 -2627 305 s. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 619 - 633 -2 -00 recycled paper • CA s � �/ '�` /. � ..+rte.. ./�• ,/�� R / �./ /mss,. `�►. �►. ./".�•�•' _��K'�._ w r,,, .r � �� r-� .. �� .,,, ... .► :,.�. ..- y am. �✓ s, .� .�.. .h / R1 ^��'^�"'�.- �'�'�1`w �S. �_ :,/� - Y�.� -`�� c1 ✓i+. ^i�� ^�'�'r�•'"��I ...` .If.,,'� +r, �^• fi r ' f : '_`-.�!,� +�,.+'+..�`�/+,�`�,� .•. /�. _ •.r 1� �.• '��.. '�.•� ' DE20 S•i' • �. ' 9E# re •,,,. tite • �:./ i' .ter ✓� +•�.�./,.r,�•��.•.4" OCKO n✓'j.+-`. �" - - i a..- �.:;r; :✓ = j,� ...f - �, �- . _... ..-_ •"'ti. '� • JCS - r ^- ! DE PRINCIPA!•PRYA6CESO ♦liowvwra�Or� - ,f�� ->a." + �orwow. A► YilerATVwrs�!' vwowsuwRinosw�o�rn�i} �csRTi�rGAar_ rcrl Aw�Q^ �Ia7lo ►rwtx'sNDO1as�D+MA•TIrwIT"`I _ j {A•1' . ISl LLi' WL7M- AyTOMA71CRiNf1WA401r ,MATUM"YPR041+TlIwOTOTIMB70R �M� /OIjAR+A =/ TWO. VNtf.!ll LLNwiNDtJ► tO�iY "OWNiR_WRNIMTi1'IDAYfAITiCST' -- U_ WA IJOI DAT -• F. r I.`TMIiDirOSK ■ tARf.INTiAS•fT'`AD•TN<•RI►T�"0� /1bA ^NVY�TROI/DATC Or,.11iU i^TO•'MATLRIYY i%Ci►T TNATII� IN-�. :.OL /tw10C.JS, lV MJK CT'T ?GNANOF f1.MANN urolr M wmrnr - NOTIC[._ W wok Ol UMICOI AI At LtASL M IAVV DAYf►R101RTO TN a.. P 9NWA so'. COMWtNGiMtNT Or - lYG �t w100�AMO .(3I,TN /i.'OVOlIT'SNA�4aI&I INTMRi! ►rOl�l►rtRIODrOt/NOT MOwi. TMRIrTtIt TWARIA ROM TN ts.'" �` OATt.O ►ISMY t''ANO.fMALL. NOT SWAM I MTtwtST' TMiwrAl-'rWl M/f-OtpOSTlNGL4D /NO. INTwnlczi-RATi•IS^SVMJMCT I'O wCL, LLL-- AND^ /t OS:RAL, LAWS'^ANOr.AG rmaltNT ANm_*VTVRlmuLtf�ANOIR Kau LA710NS.,01R�M'II MA GALIrORM11h NN •1NYiRtSZ.It.►A �A` TO aSROR. AT �• �� vrRlu 7MRA7S21V - OI =700= Interest Paid• Monthl y + G� j }t�U C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S EN ERING SERVICES DEPARTME16 � `. r • , 505 S. VULCAN AVE. E.17CINITAS. CA 92024 TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PEPM -IT -M lT N 428 . ' 51 -0700 PLAN NO.: 4283-G PARCEL NUJ 75- . 678 O NEPTUNE AVE. CjB S ITE ADDRESS: , , ,� ; . � LINDA "t NAME ��hTTt �,EsELEN JE.z2ROLD PHulTE 619-5-35- KAIL;NG ADDRESS: 678 NEPTUNE AVE, r� `} _ L.•1mS : lJl't t•ia`1jTA.�. `�j y ✓A Z SP: J..vL:.4 NSTRUCTION PHONE Nu.. 01 - 481 - 3 455 COIZ RACTOR GILHOLM ;,- '_ -II V, " "tSE ?YP E : 3 a �' ' "�' vLJ$�1' ARTY NAME G OLDEN EAGLE INSLMaWCE "0 - NSURA CE4 POL: 'J EX P. . DATE . 0/ 1 � "•z: BTU . . ': ''r ` 8 6i I U = � NE �1C� .. � I a - ;, , ?;NGIMEER • S��E ENGINEERII` G �. ^ . ISST DATE: 4/2' 4iu5 w - r -, � � 4/9� t aN PECTCR . E BRADY v - - - - -- SJTi ri T`j :iC :�EP �J�rTti ---------------------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — CiLi y LL1.j .: 4' wf +. � -•^T r• � t -+ 3 . SEC'UTT {IT": DEPO - ir, T—_(jN '� :�taF• -------- ----------------- -------- ------ ------ ----- - - - - -- L'a�....'`.r — CCCES = TO .JOBSITE ACROSS PUT LIC BEACH. DOCTJM�T:> INCLTJDED : COVENANT RE: -m , ,,•�woa t�� CTtOR LIA ILITY LETT oM—K _ . T 1"�.' J l BrJAtil'1 anal aid vLY l:ta .` �1x(''j ?, � =� i 1A S J VTAIM ARD' • J1 VI1 L . +iI r1r'1 .... 7S�EC'�'I rI APvROV ALS REGLTIRED . 1 -.N - - - - -- BaTy -- - - - - -- SF �- ' S SI i7ATT RE - - -- INS ---- - - - - -- - - - - INS.. �.. . �� , � l/ S L iJ i y V N '-YT T ��• +V� CTION i SNA. t -& + I HAVE CAREIMLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO i;.nREEy CERTIFY UNDER, Pr'NALTY OF LER.TURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION iS TRUE. DATE SIGNED I GNAT'URE bw TLLEPHONE NWMEER ?RINT NAME IRCLE :;NE ;wZ+ - ER 2 . :��OEN`'?' 3 . OTHER - T Y 0 F E N C I N I I A s I ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPART MENT 505 S. VULCAN AV ENCINITAS, CA 92024 TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT PARCEL NO. 256-051-0700 PLAN NO.- 4283-G e NEPTUNE WE. %'TOB SITE ADDRESS: 6 ' 6 & rINDA) APPLICANT NAME 3CHNOEBELEN (JElRROLD F. HONE MAILING ADDRESS: 678 NEPTUNE AVE, NO ;:',',A'- CA 4 9D) CITY: EENCI[NI-TAS a - -4 �3 45 5 , .7,TL! - C Ll ONS TRU CT I ON CO!Tr Y .1 17RACTOR - - -. ) M - L i N- N.C.: r EAGLE TLNSUR. Co. 13CIDEIN - C I 1411 POL I CY 7 N? 4 2 E 'IT FT El N. G I T E ' L�'A TE 4 5 ' 3,5U -er- RIM — -'-S UE ,�d,4 D T DN 'BP -ADY 7 ! -- - - - - - - .- - - - - - -- - - - - .- - - - - - - - - - - -Si DE 1 3 0 0 D EPOST' 000. 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------------------- pm- 'F "--------- ----------------------- - TD - T - � - t jrrV S IU ED: - WENAN - 'TO jOBS TE � PTJ lii. BEACH. DOCUMENT / -Wo�a NCL ELT E iBEACH : H ' LETTER CH JL ANT OF "EAC c SP1 �i'l I A L 2L -"Llll-l.�-'.�' E. i. 7�11ZPECT.N APPROVALS REQUIL p. I NS P E ICT I ON ------------- r)A',,E S S INSPECT 7,- "N � ' �'� 0 'L ?INAA.i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED PERMIT AND DO' HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS TRUE. SIGNATURE DATE SI4&' 4 16 6 4 7 Vl6 4 1 PUP-a t- Z�f 6n A? -1,442 0 p ONE NUJMBER TELE .'-RINT NAME O r -NE-$ AGEINT I-RCLE WE: "D W -�, City of r Encinitas January 18, 1996 Mr. Jerrold Schnoebelen 678 Neptune Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Z jE F - 95 -106 MUP/EIA Dear Mr. Schnoebelen: Your November 8, 1995 letter indicated that you have repaired the stairs at your site. You will need to submit evidence that the stairs are in the same alignment and of the same material as stairs that were previously constructed in accordance with local jurisdiction and Coastal Commission approval. Pursuant to Municipal Code Sections 30.34.020(B)2 and 4: 2. With the following exceptions, no structure, facility, improvement or activity shall be allowed on the face or at the base of a coastal bluff. Exceptions are: a. Public beach access facilities, as reviewed and approved pursuant to paragraph C "Development Processing and Approval' below. (Ord. 91 -19) b. Preemptive measures, as defined, justified and approved pursuant to paragraph C "Development Processing and Approval' below. (Ord. 91 -19) C. Landscape maintenance, as provided by paragraph 3 of this paragraph Section 30.34.020(8)3 of this Code. (Ord. 91 -19) 4. Existing legal structures and facilities within 40 ft. of a bluff edge or on the face of a bluff may remain unchanged. Interior remodeling of existing buildings that does not involve changes to the existing foundation is allowed, but no expansion of building square footage or addition of stories within the 40 ft. area shall be allowed except as permitted pursuant to Section 30.34.020(B)la of this Code. Routine maintenance of existing facilities is allowed. (Ord. 95 -04) TEL 619 -633 -2600 / FAX 619 - 633-262' >05 S. Vulcan Avenue. Encinitas. California 92024 -3633 TDD 61g-633-2700 recycled paper LEN- 100 r 5CI fly ffMc vEffME g 1995 Mr. Bill Weedman City Planner City of Encinitas R1,12 Si i �v S 505 North Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 Dear Mr. Weedman: I felt I should inform you that I have made a decision on my stairs. Due to the fact that this property has always had beach access and the value of the property, when I purchased in 1989 was increased due to access, I do not feel I should lose that value. When the Coastal Commission allowed a sea wall to be built in 1985 they allowed construction of a lower landing to attach the steps that had been built in 1985. All I am doing is repairing the steps that fell again in January 1995. Thank you again for your understanding. Si c rely, Jerrold F. chnoebelen cc: Hans Jensen JFS /dre C V-17 By: Recording Reques ted 4 When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk ) City of Encinitas 505 S. Vulcan Avenue ) SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE Encinitas CA 92024 ) COVENANT REGARDING AR BLIIFF FAILURE HOLD CITY HARMLESS Case No.: T.B.D. Assessor's Parcel permit No.: 4283 GI No. 256 - 051 - 0 7 A. Jerrold F. Schnoebelen and Linda L. Schnoebelen, ("OWNER" hereinafter), is the owner of real property which is commonly known as 678 Neptune Avenue ( "PROPERTY" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. In consideration of an application for a Major Use Permit T.B.D. by the City of Encinitas ( "CITY" hereinafter) , OWNER hereby covenants and agrees for the benefit of CITY, to do the following: See Attachment B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the future owners, encumbrancers, successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of the respective parties. D. OWNER agrees that OWNER's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the PROPERTY. Upon notice and 10e10a 1 JAN 90 cov4565 opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property tax bill of the PROPERTY any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. F. Failure of OWNER to comply with the terms of this Covenant shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a Notice of Violation of Covenant. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: ER Dated S Dated (Notarization of OWNER s'gnature is attached.) CITY OF CINIT S Dated 2� by Alan D. Archibald (Notarization not required) Director of Engineering Services 10el0a 1 JAN 90 cov4565 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of r County of � O before me, Name and Title of officer (e.g.. Jane Doe, Notary FutNIC ) at .L�/ll JA of personally appeared _� 4 -p Names) of Signer(s) ome – OR oved to me on the basis of sati actory evidence to be t El personally known t he person(s) whose name(s) i are ubscribed to Zowh ecuted the and acknowled me that he /sh d that b same in . he hef uthon the instrument ( the person(s) .. Rana G. MiUjour his/ r /their ignature(s) o •^ C #1038151 2 or the n Ity upon behalf of which the persons) acte , 'P ,�; NJTBRYkmUCZALHTM executed the instrument. � My Comm. Exp Jan. e, 1999 WITNESS my hand and official seal. gn Notary Publ' _ Wv OPTIONAL Though the information below is not re qu i red b reat of by law, valu form p on the document and could prevent fra Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Number of Pages: -- Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Individual [:1 Corporate Officer E] Corporate Officer Title(s): Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Trustee El Guardian or Conservator • El Guardian or Conservator • Top of thumb here ❑ Other: Top of thumb here ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: ® 1994 National Notary Association • 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Park. CA 91309 -7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder. Call Toll -Free 1- 800 - 876 -6827 ATTACHMENT "A" TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR BLUFF FAILURE PEMITT NO. 4283 GI PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 19 in Block "E" a portion of Block "F" in South Coast t to N of County of San Diego, 3, in the City of Encinitas, filed in the office California, according to map thereof No. 1935, Au st 17, 1926, of the County Recorder of San Diego County, 5u described as follows: of said Beginning at the northwesterly corner Lot lalong t e E,+ westerly South Coast Park No. 3; thence wess terly Block "E" to its prolongation of the northerly line e of that of 19, tract of land as intersection with the easterly by conveyed by the South Coast Land Co. to the County of S Page l 256 of deed dated January 10, 1030 and recorded in Book 1731, Deeds, Records of San Diego County; thence southerly prolongation of easterly line to its intersection with the westerly ence easterly along the southerly line of said Lot 19, Block R corner of said Lot said westerly prolongation to the southwesterly 19, Block "E"; thence northerly along said westerly line of said Lot 19, Block "E" to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom that portion, if any, heretofore or now lying below the mean high tide of the Pacific Ocean. 10e10a 1 JAN 90 cov4565 1 817 ATTACHMENT 11 TO COVENANT REGARDING REAL PROPERTY: HOLD CITY HARMLESS FOR BLUFF FAILURE PERMIT NO. 4283 GI OWNER'S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS 1. For claims that are alleged to have arisen, directly or indirectly, from any bluff failure or erosion associated with the PROPERTY or the plans, design, construction or maintenance of OWNER's improvements, OWNER unconditionally waives all present and future claims against CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees, and agents. This waiver does not apply to claims that are alleged to have arisen out of the sole, active negligence or deliberate, wrongful act of CITY. 2. It is further understood and agreed that all of OWNER'S rights under § 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California and any similar law of any state or territory of the United States are hereby expressly waived. § 1542 reads as follows: 1542. Certai claims not affected by general release. A general release does not extend to creditor does not know or claims which the suspect to exist in his favor at the time Of executing the release, which if known by must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor. 3. OWNER agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of OWNER or OWNER's agents, employees, loeloa 1 JAN 90 cov4565 subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives. Upon demand, OWNER shall, at its own expense, defend CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all such liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs. OWNER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the plans, specifications and design of the improvements; but does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of a defect in the plans, specifications or design that is a result of a change required by CITY to the OWNER's proposed plans, specifications or design so long as such change is objected to, in writing, by OWNER, and the writing is filed with the City Engineer more than ten days prior to the commencement of work. OWNER's obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, alleged defects in the construction of the improvements; alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the improvements; alleged injury to persons or property; and any alleged inverse condemnation of property as a consequence of the design, construction, or maintenance of the improvements. By approving the improvement plans, specifications and design or by inspecting or approving the improvements, CITY shall not have waived the protections afforded herein to CITY and CITY's officers, official's, employees and agents or diminished the obligation of OWNER who shall remain obligated in the same degree to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, cov4565 10e10a 1 JAN 90 r employees and agents, harmless as provided above. OWNER's obligation herein does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of the CITY'S intentional wrongful acts, CITY'S violations of law, or CITY's sole active negligence. 4. OWNER hereby agrees not to develop in any manner the PROPERTY except as authorized by CITY's ordinances and then only in accordance with issued permits. Among other things, but without limitation, this shall prohibit the alteration of land forms, removal of vegetation and the erection of structures of any type, except as permitted or authorization by CITY. 5. This Covenant does not preclude OWNER taking emergency, protective measures as approved by CITY. cov4565 10e10a 1 JAN 90 T When Recorded Mail To: ) City Clerk ) City of Encinitas ) 505 S. Vulcan Avenue ) Encinitas, California 92024 j SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE COVENANT REGARDING GRANT OF BEACH ACCESS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR ACCESS ACROSS PUBLIC BEACH TO SEAWALL CONSTRUCTION SITE Jerrold F. Schnoebelen and Linda L. Schnoebelen Assessor's Parcel Case No- :T .B•D. No. 256 - 051 -07 Permit No.: 4283 TE WHEREAS, Jerrold F. Schnoebelen and Linda L. Schnoebelen, (" PERMITTEE" hereinafter) is the owner of bluff top, ocean front real property which is commonly known as 678 Neptune Avenue ( "DOMINANT ESTATE" hereinafter) and which is described as follows: See Attachment A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. WHEREAS, the City of Encinitas, ( "CITY" hereinafter), a municipal corporation, holds an interest in beach property ( "PUBLIC BEACH RECREATIONAL A an „ more fully described as follows: of the DOMINANT ES TATE d See Attachment B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. WHEREAS, PERMITTEE desires to construct a seawall at a location immediately seaward of the DOMINANT ESTATE ( "PROJECT SITE" hereinafter) AREA during the and construction s f the seawall Co BEACH RECREATIONAL he PROJECT SITE. WHEREAS, PERMITTEE desires an entitlement to use the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATIONAL AREA during the construction of the seawall; NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: A. CITY hereby grants to PERMITTEE an encroachment permit in respect to the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATIONAL AREA in accordance with the following: See Attachment C which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. Version: March 9, 1994 11:40 Page 1 cov 4218 C. This Covenant shall run with the future d binding upon and inure to the benefiersonalthrepresentatives, transferees and successors, heirs, p assigns of the respective parties. D. PERMITTEE agrees that PERMITTEE's duties and obligations under this Covenant are a lien upon the DOMINANT ESTATE. Po tax bill and opportunity to respond, CITY may add to the property the DOMINANT ESTATE any past due financial obligation owing to CITY by way of this Covenant. E. By accepting the benefits of this Covenant, PERMITTEE acknowledges that all right t title that title PUBLIC BEACH RECREATIONAL F. If either party is required to incur costs to enforce the provisions of this Covenant, the prevailing party shall be entitled to full reimbursement of all costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from the other party. s Failur of te tteEconsent to t comply the filing by terms CY of this a Covenant Notice of shall cons Violation of Covenant. H. PERMITTEE recognizes and understands that this Covenant may create a possessory interest subject to property taxation and that the PERMITTEE may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest. I. As conditions precedent to PERMITTEE's right to go upon the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATIONAL AREA: 1. This Covenant must first be signed by the PERMITTEE and notarized; and then executed by the CITY and recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Diego. Any recording fee shall be paid by PERMITTEE; 2. PERMITTEE must fully satisfy each and every condition precedent to the exercise of PERMITTEE's entitlement to go upon the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATIONAL AREA; and 3. PERMITTEE must first comply with the State Coastal Act by either obtaining the approval of the State Coastal Commission, obtaining a waiver thereof, or qualifying for an exemption therefrom, as needed to construct the seawall on public property and traverse the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATIONAL AREA to construct the seawall. J. This Covenant does not preclude PERMITTEE from taking emergency, protective measures as approved by CITY. K. PERMITTEE agrees to provide written disclosures, and require written consent from, any and all future owners, p a successors, heirs, personal representatives, transferees and assigns of PERMITTEE's interest in the PROPERTY to the effect that this Covenant is acceptable. Provided, however, if such consent is not rendered, it shall in no way affect the enforceability of this Version: March 9, 1994 11:40 Page 2 Covenant against such party. The consent shall expressly state that the party has received a copy of this Covenant and shall abide by the terms hereof. L. Upon PERMITTEE's transfer of the PROPERTY to a successor in interest, PERMITTEE may apply to the CITY for a release of PERMITTEE's personal obligations set forth in this Covenant. The CITY shall execute the requested release if it is demonstrated that the successor in interest has fully assumed the obligations herein. M. As delegated by the State Lands Commission, the City hereby conveys State Lands Commission permission to the PERMITTEE to traverse the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATIONAL AREA to construct the seawall and to construct the seawall on public property. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: ES Dated Dated S r (Notarttion f P ERMITTE ignature is attached.) I certify on behalf of the City Council of the City of Encinitas, pursuant to the authority conferred by said City Council, that the City is authorized to execute this Covenant. Dated B y Alan D. Archibald, Director of (Notarization not required) Engineering Services City of Encinitas Version: March 9, 1994 11:40 Page 3 CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of County of '(2 — before me, A15W F O 11 / Name l and Title off officer lee.g., Jane Doe, Nottary yPPub Al personally appeared J 1eO� r Names) of Signer(s) ❑ personally known to me - OR oved to me on the basis of sati ctory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) ' are ubscribed to the in instrument and acknowled me that he /s he xecuted the same in r /their thorized capacity(fes), and that y Randa G. Milljour his /he their ' nature(s ) on the instrument the person(s), , Comm. #1038151 �� "`" or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, n ?� ' -w NOT W ot� co+.xr0RMA r executed the instrument. M Comm. EV Jan. 6,1999 WITNESS my hand and official seal. U gn.l.r. �1-1-1 P is OPTIONAL Though the information below is no le re quired r emo val a reattachment of this form valua p e rs on a no ther ying on t document and could prevent Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact [I Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Trustee , : - ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Guardian or Conservator C] Other: Top of thumb here ❑ Other: Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: 0 1994 National Notary Association 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91309 -7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call ToIF -Free 1- 800.876 -6827 ATTACHMENT A TO COVENANT REGARDING GRANT OF BEACH ACCESS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR ACCESS ACROSS PUBLIC BEACH TO SEAWALL CONSTRUCTION SITE Jerrold F. Schnoebelen and Linda L. Schnoebelen i PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: DOMINANT ESTATE Lot 19 in Block " E " a portion of Block "F" in South Coast Park No. 3, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 1935, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, August 17, 1926, described as follows: Beginning at the northwesterly corner of Lot 19, Block " E " of said South Coast Park No. 3; thence westerly along the westerly prolongation of the northerly line of said Lot 19, Block "E" to its intersection with the easterly line of that tract of land as conveyed by the South Coast Land Co. to the County of San Diego by deed dated January 10, 1030 and recorded in Book 1731, Page 256 of Deeds, Records of San Diego County; thence southerly along the said easterly line to its intersection with the westerly prolongation of the southerly line of said Lot 19, Block "K"; thence easterly along said westerly prolongation to the southwesterly corner of said Lot 19, Block " E " ; thence northerly along said westerly line of said Lot 19, Block " E " to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom that portion, if any, heretofore or now lying below the mean high tide of the Pacific Ocean. cov 4218 Version: March 9, 1994 11:40 Page 4 m �cA PW'. eL3>' , ' C) a CJ H O - - - — 4i - - -- -- a CO ) a - - - I/ O-� - -- < H aUa -- -- - - -- - -- — - - - - -- - -- o i 04 old H a a - -- -- 7 -- - -- _ -- - -- I a - - - -- > zw�� - H H m -- -- a x - i - --- a P W GU r U O 0 0 P4 — - -- -- - -- I - -- -- � a vdicc �nL - - o9 c rt -� - - - — - ^- Cots M y r _ - -- _ ; `u AP R 2Q 199 0 �, H t7l F ?,CIC.E�R G�iC dtTPS - — x � - - -- - 1994 11.40 Page 5 Version: March 9, - - - - -- — cov 4218 • f ATTACHMENT C TO COVENANT REGARDING GRANT OF BEACH ACCESS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR ACCESS ACROSS PUBLIC BEACH TO SEAWALL CONSTRUCTION SITE Jerrold F. Schnoebelen and Linda L. Schnoebelen DESCRIPTION OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND PERMITTEE's DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS 1.0 LOCATION OF ENCROACHMENT AREA The location of the beach access encroachment area is depicted on the map which is contained in Attachment B to this Covenant. 2.0 PURPOSE OF ENCROACHMENT: The purpose of the beach access encroachment permit is to entitle PERMITTEE to use the PUBLIC'BEACH RECREATIONAL AREA as required for the construction of the seawall at the PROJECT SITE. 3'.0 USE OF PUBLIC BEACH RECREATIONAL AREA 3.1 PERMITTEE shall submit to the City Engineer a written proposal setting forth the day[s], hours] and safety conditions in accordance with which PERMITTEE proposes to use of the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATIONAL AREA during the construction of the seawall. 3.2 The CITY's Engineer shall expeditiously issue written direction setting forth the day[s], hour[s] and safety conditions reasonably necessary to protect the public from PERMITTEE's use of the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATIONAL AREA during the construction of the seawall. 3.3 PERMITTEE agrees not to go upon or use the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATIONAL AREA for any purpose involving the construction of the seawall at the PROJECT SITE on any day or at any hour, except in complete conformance with the terms and conditions of this Covenant which includes the written directions signed by the CITY's Engineer. 4.0 TERM OF ENCROACHMENT PERMI This COVENANT shall be effective upon its execution by the CITY and shall remain in effect until canceled by the CITY. 5.0 OTHER PROVISIONS In consideration of CITY's execution of this Covenant: 5.1 PERMITTEE waives the right to object to the formation of any geologic hazard abatement district, assessment district or maintenance district which includes within its boundaries the cov 4218 Version: March 9, 1994 11:40 Page 6 DOMINANT ESTATE and which concerns sand replenishment or the stabilization of the DOMINANT ESTATE property. 5.2 PERMITTEE agrees that if and when the CITY or a special district determines that it is necessary for the DOMINANT ESTATE to participate in a project which addresses the stabilization of the DOMINANT ESTATE property, the PERMITTEE shall either construct the project or pay PERMITTEE's fair share of the cost to construct such project. 5.3 PERMITTEE agrees not to develop in any manner the DOMINANT ESTATE except as authorized by CITY's ordinances and then only in accordance with issued permits. Among other things, but without limitation, this shall prohibit the alteration of land forms and the erection of structures of any type, except as permitted or authorized by CITY. 6.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF RISKS AND POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES: WAIVERS 6.1 ASSUMPTION ON RISKS BY PERMITTEE. PERMITTEE acknowledges and assumes the risk that: a. the design, construction, maintenance, or functioning of the seawall may not result in the stabilization of the DOMINANT ESTATE and may result in the destabilization of the DOMINANT ESTATE and may otherwise cause damage to the DOMINANT ESTATE, the public beach, persons, adjacent public or private property, or other property; b. The use of the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATION AREA as set forth in Part 3.0 herein above, may result in the destabilization of the DOMINANT ESTATE and may otherwise cause damage to the DOMINANT ESTATE, the public beach, persons, adjacent public or private property, or property in the vicinity; and C. Aspects of the seawall project may be judicially challenged by third parties. 6.2 WAIVER OF CLAIMS AGAINST CITY. For claims that are alleged to have arisen, directly or indirectly, from the plans, design, construction, maintenance, functioning or failure of the seawall or from the use of the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATION AREA as set forth in Part 3.0 herein above, PERMITTEE unconditionally waives all present and future claims against CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees, and agents. 6.3 PERMITTEE's waiver herein includes, but is not limited to, claims concerning PERMITTEE's use of the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATION AREA; alleged defects in the plan, design, construction, maintenance, or functioning of the seawall; alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the seawall; alleged injury to persons or property allegedly caused by, or in any way related to, the seawall or PERMITTEE's use of the PUBLIC RECREATION AREA; or any alleged inverse condemnation of property as a consequence of the design, construction, maintenance or functioning of the seawall. This Section is expressly not intended to act as Version: March 9, 1994 11:40 Page 7 a limitation to the broad waiver set forth in Section 6.2. . 6.4 PERMITTEE agrees that for claims that are alleged to have arisen, directly or indirectly, from the CITY's efforts to assist PERMITTEE in constructing a seawall or using the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATION AREA, PERMITTEE unconditionally waives all present and future claims against CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees, and agents. 6.5 PERMITTEE's waiver set forth in Sections 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 does not apply to claims that are alleged to have arisen out of the sole, active negligence or deliberate, wrongful act of CITY. 6.6 It is further understood and agreed that all of PERMITTEE's rights under § 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California and any similar law of any state or territory of the United States are hereby expressly waived with respect to claims against CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees, and agents relating to the seawall or the use of the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATION AREA. Section 1542 reads as follows: 1542. Cer tain claims not affected by creneral release. A general release does not extend to claims whic the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor. 7.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF RISKS AND POSSIBLE CONSE UENCES: INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 7.1 PERMITTEE TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD CITY HARMLESS. PERMITTEE agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof including attorneys' fees, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, any acts or omissions of PERMITTEE or PERMITTEE's agents, employees, subcontractors, officials, officers or representatives in respect to the seawall or the use of the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATION AREA. Upon demand, PERMITTEE shall, at its own expense, defend CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all such liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs. 7.2 PERMITTEE agrees to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents harmless from, and against any and all liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages and costs, including all costs of defense thereof including attorneys' fees, arising out of, or in any manner connected directly or indirectly with, the CITY's efforts or actions to assist PERMITTEE in the seawall construction. 7.3 PERMITTEE's indemnification and hold harmless obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, claims concerning alleged defects in the plans, specifications and design of the seawall; but does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, Version: March 9, 1994 11:40 Page 8 • losses, damages or costs that arise out of a defect in the plans, specifications or design that is a result of a change required by CITY to the PERMITTEE's proposed plans, specifications or design so long as such change is objected to, in writing, by PERMITTEE, and the writing is filed with the City Engineer more than ten days prior to the commencement of work. 7.4 PERMITTEE's indemnification and hold harmless obligation herein includes, but is not limited to, claims concerning PERMITTEE's use of the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATION AREA; alleged defects in the plan, design, construction, maintenance, or functioning of the seawall; alleged defects in the materials furnished in the construction of the seawall; alleged injury to persons or property allegedly caused by, or in any way related to the seawall or PERMITTEE's use of the PUBLIC RECREATION AREA; or any alleged inverse condemnation of property as a consequence of the design, construction, maintenance or functioning of the seawall. This Section is expressly not intended to act as a limitation to the broad indemnification and hold harmless provisions set forth in Sections 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3. 7.5 By approving the improvement plans, specifications and design or by inspecting or approving the seawall or the use of the PUBLIC BEACH RECREATION AREA, CITY shall not have waived the protection afforded herein to CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents or diminished the obligation of PERMITTEE who shall remain obligated in the same degree to indemnify and hold CITY and CITY's officers, officials, employees and agents, harmless as specifically provided above. 7.6 PERMITTEE's obligation herein does not extend to liabilities, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, damages or costs that arise out of CITY's intentional wrongful acts, CITY's violations of law, or CITY's sole active negligence. 7.7 The CITY herein expressly does not waive any defenses, immunities or other protections from liability afforded to the CITY by the laws of the United States or the State of California, to include without limitation, the California Government Code. Version: March 9, 1994 11:40 Page 9 C T T Y to " N C T. 1 T A S _ iN tC \FJT ti ENCINIT ,;�, CA 92 TEIN ORARY ENCROAcC UEN PERMIT PERMI NO.: 4283TE 356- 051 -0700 PLAN NO.: 4283 - G PARCEL Nu . jOB SITE ADDRESS: 678 NEE-i tTNE AVE. APPLICANT NAME SC1210EBELEN (jERROLD F. & LINDA PHONE NO.. 535 - 02 MAILING ADDRESS: • 6 78 NEPTUNE AVE. ENC NI •l A - STATE: CA PHONE Nu. 619 - 481 - 34 55 cot:4 `i'F:ACT:�'k v- L:iOLM CONSTRUCTION : - TNSU;' ZkNCE COMPANY NAME : GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE Co - POLIC _ P C) - T t l y Nv. N . `�421 yNlCliv��F. S - '?vU?N EF:IIvt_; L (/ .../ w..L �a - J P 4/ F'R:M? T S SUE DAT 4! :: c 5 DATE: PE:MIT TSSJET.' BY .. - X ------------------- - - - - -- PEruMIT' FEES & DEPOSITS ---------------------------- ON DE'P(D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ✓ a.. r� a r a a "1 .'. Z _ _ t !J✓'� � .~... .�t.•:.ti r7_.i () L .. . J."urACH- DC- )C7: EN `I t.Lv UL�:.� �•—. - ,'�i -{ ` ' �a� ' .+.�., / %h�:.•v'.t, r i t 7 7 . 7 kB ,..si 1 Y .�i.i f -i /wti.�r� 'D A�• -: - -J -ItZ, T' �� SpE A If ^ f 1 y y _'.`.�, iirAL 1 �•� 1. J " L1� < ..iJ rx Lt1 i a J..1 t1 ��1 LI�L�i,.,I..� R -1EQU T a:ED . '_vSPECTION - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- DATE. -- - - - - -- INSPECTOR" S SIGNA'T R- - - - - L'J LA --------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------- ------------------------------------------------ - - - - - - - - -,__ -• -,_ — ^ —_ � L 1�vjl`i` �U l.}tJ HAVE CA EF�JLLY EXAMTN H ( OMPL; 1�D i - - AL - �, -L THE , NY'.7F;MATION _S TRUE. PE'J T Y� ti 1 �L L Tt�i�T'J L �w X42 0 � �1� �=,� �•� �_ r �as�C� ,7 � � / _'I G, � Yi L7 KE .~. P C I T Y OF E N C I N I T A S ENGINEERING SER7 S DEPAR� " 1 a. 505 S. v!TLCAN AVE. ENCINITAS, CA 9 120 24 GRADING PERMIT P NO.: 4283GI _ PARCEL NO. 256- 051 -0706 PLAN Nu.: 4283 -G jOB SITE ADDRESS: 678 NEPTUNE AVE. APPLICAN'T' NAME SCHNOEBELEN (JERROLD F. & LINDA) PHONE NO. 619-535 MAILING ADDRESS: 678 NEPTUNE AVE. CITY: ENCINITAS STATE: CA ZIP: 92024 - CON- TRACTOR : GILHOLM CONSTRUCTION PHONE NO.: 619- 481 - 3455 LICENSE NO.: 530087 LICENSE TYPE: B ,_ -, - H NO 6 9 -942 - 8379 rJNGINEER SMELLY ENGINEERING PERMIT ISSUE DATE: 4/::4/95 PERMIT EXP. DATE: 1 PERMIT ISSUED B Y: INSPECTOR: RON BRADY - FEES & -,--- i', D EPOSI T ' S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------ �;�II 4. INSPECTION DEPOSIT -'000.00 PLAN CHECK - E 00 -. iL4val.~...t�i�Jiv i 'Mf f TV I rH'utJ U y,��LL L ✓tea ' t J . LAIa r~..L:� �'.`.J i H l ------------------- - - - - -- D :' aCR1P'iTQ:� OF WORK ------------------------------- u. +• -'J�V L L� LJ !JL� a.i \.. :�':::y�iL1 V...)i SLU {� ?•5'J �:T�U1`S :_ ; y 1. VY - __ __ -• � ,7-, 4 ry} `.±. .'ti t y''.\ -1 `�tJ' L) �} i i 7 i� i'AL1..3S tJ l • vL.ry — n Tr� .�;JTE ATT:�t ~JJiJ. -,OJ LAN RE: L� _ 7, • L.J . rf . • 3 L�� 1 '�- 1 -• 1 �'y tom ! 'A� ' , T PL FAILU D 11TICN �O ,:`SIN `•3.H. A.J. _, ALL T .�UL)EJ. -.+— — aJ - U SE NSP _PCT : W r.ED . CO MPLETION OF ;�IA Ox a �� ., LTT�•E'7 �l�T�aAL T L �t�N AP -0vAL5 rLEUL - - !� a a ✓. r r L .t a. T TY . D .A ."EPOST ' .` 428•J' i!: 'J1� i^'Tt�E JrP�): a a ---- INSPECTION --------------- - DATE -- - ----- INSPECTiJR'S 3TGNATU E - - -- INITIAL iNSPECTTUN T' f i V N'C f.' 1 l! iD •1 ./1 ":L :']tJt tJL� Vl \i .� • R�. 1 1 7'-7 'T i L'1 \J 1r�Lr..1\ 'J Ll`.a . r �L..a V ✓ U , F 7 1 7 AL IN SPECTION --------------------------------- I H ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I H AVE READ THE APPLICATION AND STA HAl 111E ITSr URM :�TT :N T � t J!� v v . AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY OR.JTNANCES Al u STATE E. j T ,tom EXCAVATTNG AND GRADING AND THE - uVISTc�NS t'.U?vL'ITI`JN°, OF LAWS r: tat LA 1 � , T TO THIS AP LIt�ATI0N. ANY PEL��iI'T I S SUED PUitS JAS . DA�,S S1GNi0 S T GN ATUR E PRINT NAME TELEPHONE NGY1� CIRCLE - 'Y �' M. .' 7\ N _j ( -� - GE T OT HER 1 lER 1 / O \i V J • f iT .-/ ' C I � CLE JLJa, . . OWNED _ . A 3r N l � . y i City O Encinitas City of Encinitas City of Encinitas Administrative Services Engineering Services Accounting Division Public Service counter ENGINEERING APPLICANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES The City of Encinitas Engineering Services Department maintains a ,, cost Recovery" System for the resources used in providing development services requested by an applicant. Actual staff time and accounts payable expenditures are recorded to an assigned project code for each applicant requested service. A 67% administrative overhead surcharge is also applied to all services. Applicants are also requested to provide deposit amounts based on guidelines approved in City ordinances. The deposit will be used to offse charges exceeded the service initial sery ce ha g s, a refund forthe applicant difference will be remitted. Additional funds may be requested in the future if the initial deposit payment was insufficient. If an applicant does not respond to a request for additional funds, a stop Work order will be issued for their project. Completing a development project in a timely manner is essential in minimizing the amount of service charges. Plan checking charges are dependent on the quality of the submitted plans as well as responses to document corrections. Upon permit issuance, inspectors will perform periodic visits to evaluate site improvements. If plan check costs exceed deposits, the applicant shall pay the outstanding balance prior to permit issuance. If inspection costs exceed deposits, the appilicant shall pay the outstanding balance prior to release of the security deposit. Public improvement projects (i.e., road construction, sewer main extension, etc.) require the retention of a 25% warranty of the project cost estimate for a one -year period following the date of acceptance. If you have any questions regarding this procedure, please call the Engineering public service counter at 633 - 2779/2780. m13363 OQ 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TEL 619- 633 -2600 i FAx 619- 633 -2627 % TDD 619- 633 -j700 recycled paper f` 4�j GRADIN PLAN GENERAL NOTES FOR P ERMIT NO. 4283 GI 1 city Of (MUP T.B.D.) Encinitas WORK TO BE DONE A. GENERAL 1. All work shall be done in accordance with these plans, the standard specifications for public works construction, the design construction standards of the City of Encinitas and the San Diego area regional standard drawings. Any or revisions therefrom shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any request for inspection. 2. The soil reports titled Geologic Reconnaissance, e, Residential Property, Neptune Encinitas, California, prepared by Michael W. Hart, Engineering Geologist, dated February, 6, 1995, and Preliminary Review of Slope Failure, Residence Located at 678 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas, California, prepared by Accutech Engineering Systems, Inc., dated January 17, 1995, .shall be considered as a part of this grading plan. All grading shall be done in accordance with the recommendations and specifications contained in said report. 3. Approval of this plan does not constitute approval of sizes, location and type of drainage facilities, nor of improvements within street right -of -ways. Separate approvals and permits for these shall be required in conjunction with improvement plans. 4. Written permission shall be obtained for any off - site grading. 5. Contractor shall take any necessary precautions required to protect adjacent properties during grading operations. Anything damaged or destroyed shall be replaced or repaired to condition existing prior to grading. 6. The developer shall be responsible that any monument or bench mark which is disturbed or destroyed shall be re- established and replaced by a registered civil engineer or a licensed land surveyor. pol4566 1 TEL 619- 633 -2600 / FAX 619- 633 -2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 619- 633 -2700 recycled paper 7. The contractor shall design, construct and maintain all safety devices, including shoring, and shall be responsible for conforming to all local, state and federal safety and health standards, laws and regulations. 8. Grading and equipment operating within 1/2 mile of a structure for human occupancy shall not be conducted between the hours of 5:30 p.m. and 7:30 a.m. nor on Saturdays, Sundays and City recognized holidays unless in conformance with a work schedule approved by the Director of Engineering Services and Superintendent of Parks and Beaches. 9. No grading operations shall commence until a pregrading meeting has been held onsite with the following people present: Engineering Inspector, Assistant Planner, Lifeguard Supervisor, Civil Engineer, Soils Engineer, Grading Contractor, and Permittee. The pregrade meeting shall be scheduled with the City at least 48 hours in advance by calling (619) 633 -2770. 10. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation. 11. Upon final completion of the work under the grading permit but prior to final grading approval and /or final release of security, an as- graded certification shall be provided stating: "The grading under Permit No. 4283 GI has been performed in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan or as shown on the attached as- graded plan ". This statement shall be followed by the date ands signature of the Civil Engineer who certifies such grading operation. B. NOTIFICATIONS 1. The existence and location of underground utility piPes and structures shown on these plans were obtained by a search of available records. To the best of our knowledge there are no existing utilities except as shown on these plans, however: The contractor is required to take due precautionary measures to protect any existing pol4566 2 utilities or structures located at the work site. It is the contractor's- responsibility ! to contact the following: owners of said utilities or structures prior to any excavation, for verification and location of utilities and notification of commencement of work: a. Sewers - Encinitas Sanitary District b. Gas & Electric - San Diego Gas & Electric Co. C. Water - San Dieguito Water District d. Telephone - Pacific Bell e. Cable TV - Dimension Cable Services, Daniels Cablevision. These companies may be notified by calling 1- 800- 422 -4133. 2. Contractor shall notify the City Engineer's office 48 hours prior to beginning any work on this project. Phone: (619) 633 -2770. 3. The contractor shall give 24 hours notice on calls for inspection. Phone: (619) 633 -2770. All work performed without benefit of inspection will be subject to rejection and removal. C. GRADING 1. All grading shall be observed and tested by a qualified soils engineer or under his /her direction. He /She shall observe and test the excavation placement and compaction of fills and backfills' and compaction of trenches. He /She shall submit soils reports as required and will determine the suitability of any fill material. Upon completion of grading operations he /she shall state that observations and tests were made by him /her or under his /her supervision and that in his /her opinion, all embankments and excavations were constructed in accordance with the approved grading plans and that all embankments and excavations are acceptable for their intended use. pol4566 3 2. The contractor shall properly grade all excavated surfaces to provide positive drainage and prevent ponding of water. He /she shall control surface water and avoid damage to adjoining properties or to finished work on the site and shall take remedial measures to prevent erosion of freshly graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. 3. All areas to be filled shall be prepared to be filled and fill shall be placed in accordance with standard specifications. All vegetable matter and objectionable material shall be removed by the contractor from the surface upon which the fill is to be placed. Loose fill and alluvial soils shall be removed to suitable firm natural ground. The exposed soils shall be scarified to a depth of 6" and then compacted to a minimum of 90 percent. It shall be the contractor's responsibility to place, spread, water and compact the fill in strict accordance with specifications. 4. Cut and fill slopes shall be cut and trimmed to finish grade to produce smooth surfaces and uniform cross sections. The slopes of excavations and embankments shall be shaped, planted and trimmed as directed by the engineer of work and left in a neat and orderly condition. All stones, roots and other waste matter exposed or excavation or embankment slopes which are liable to become loosened shall be removed and disposed of. The toe and top of all slopes shall be rounded in accordance with the Grading Ordinance. 5. All trees, brush, grass, and other objectionable material shall be collected, piled or otherwise disposed of off the site by the contractor so as to leave the areas that have been cleared with a neat and finished appearance free from unsightly debris. Approval of location of debris fill shall be secured from the soils engineer and City Engineer prior to the disposal of any such material. D. EROSION CONTROL 1. In case emergency work is required, contact: ,cam (fit L s r.�z C� 1 ; 76 6 pol4566 4 2. Equipment and workers for emergency work shall be made available at all times during the rainy season_ All necessary materials shall be stockpiled on site at convenient locations to facilitate rapid construction of temporary devices when rain is imminent. 3. Devices shown on plans shall not be moved or modified without the approval of the Engineering Inspector. 4. The contractor shall restore all erosion control devices to working order to the satisfaction of the City Engineer after each run -off producing rainfall. 5. The contractor shall install additional erosion control measures as may be required by the City Engineer due to an uncompleted grading operation or unforeseen circumstances which may arise. 6. The contractor shall be responsible and shall take necessary precautions to prevent public trespass onto areas when impounded waters create a hazardous condition. 7. All erosion control measures provided per the approved grading plan shall be incorporated hereon. 8. Graded areas around the project perimeter must drain away from the face of slope at the conclusion of each work day. 9. All removable protective devices shown shall be in place at the end of each working day when the 5 day rain probability forecast exceeds 40%. Silt and other debris shall be removed after each rainfall. 10. Should germination of hydroseeded slopes fail to provide effective coverage of graded slopes (90% coverage)'prior to November 15, the slopes shall be stabilized with punched straw installed in accordance with Section 35.023 of the Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook of the State of California Department of Conservation. pol4566 5 GRADING=- PLAID CERTIFI:CAT FOB PERMZr Na_ `E GAL ( MUP T.B.D.) SOILS ENGINES V S CERTIFICATE registere& civil: engineer in the State of Cali:forrti.a, principally daing business: in the= field of applied soil mechanics, hereby certify_ that a. sampling anct study of they soil conditions prevalent within this- situ was- made ayd me ors S under my direction between the dates �a� L q�- e — One complete copy Of the soils: report compiled; from this. study, with my recommendations, has beers submitted: to the office of the City Engineer_. Furthermore, I have reviewed: these, . ndations. included in the grading plans and certify that the recomme sails report for this project have been incorporated in the grading plans and ecific SIGNED' /�'j RCE NO.: z� 6 5`7 EXP. DATE: - OWNERS CERTIFICATE I (WE) HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A REGISTERED SOILS ENGINEER OR GEOLOGIST HAS BEEN OR WILL BE RETAINED TO SUPERVISE OVER ALL GRADING ACTIVITY AND DVISE ON THE COMPACTION AND STABILITY OF THE SITE. Signature Date DECLARATION F RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I HEREBY DECLARE THAT I AM THE ENGINEER OF WORK FOR THIS PROJECT, THAT L HAVE EXERCISED RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OVER THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6703 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE, AND THAT THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CHECK OF PROJECT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS BY THE CITY OF ENCINITAS IS CONFINED TO A REVIEW ONLY AND DOES NOT RELIEVE ME, AS ENGINEER OF WORK, OF MY RESPONSIBILITIES FOR PROJECT DESIGN. (NAME, DDRESS (r,✓7 C� 1 12o 2 q TELEP E NO. OF ENGINEER OF WORK) ( 5 9y2 r�3 / BY: Signature RCE NO.: �7 EXP . DATE D� t pol3846 7 `I 1 c City Of Encinitas COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT STANDARD AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS BEACH ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 4283TE 1. Permittee shall provide a Certificate of Public Liability Insurance with the City of Encinitas listed as an additional insured in the amount of $1,000,000. 2. Permittee shall post a Financial Deposit Instrument from a Financial Institution approved by the City, in the amount of $2,000.00 prior to entering upon City Property, to ensure all terms and conditions of the Permit are fully met. 3. Permittee shall deposit to the City the sum of $700.00 for the use of City Property. This deposit will be used to pay for the cost of inspecting the City Property. 4. Permittee shall provide a detailed plan, which must be approved by the City prior to the Permittee entering upon City Property. The plan shall include times the City Property will be used, types of vehicles which will be used, the number of trips vehicles will make. Work Schedule received April 24, 1995 Equipment List received April 24, 1995 Beach Access Plan received April 24, 1995 5. A notarized letter shall be provided, indicating the Construction Contractor will be liable for any costs to correct damages to the Public Beach or adjacent areas resulting from the Contractor's work. Also included in the letter shall be a statement of understanding that debris washing onto the Beaches within one mile north or south of the job site is assumed to be construction debris and shall be removed by the Contractor at no expense to the City. Construction debris is defined as lumber, piling, poles, crates, boxes, containers, and other objects which could be used for construction similar to that being used on the site. Debris also includes any pre- existing items excavated at the site such as re -bar, concrete and bricks. Document received 1995 6. Permittee shall present a Beach Barrier Plan to protect the public from equipment movement, construction activity and construction site. Document received April 24 1995 The Engineering Inspector may request changes to the Plan on as- needed basis. bp4117 TEL 619 - 633-2600 / FAX 619 - 633-2627 505 S. Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 TDD 619 - 633-2700 recycled paper 4283TE Conditions - Page 2/4 7. The storage status of Contractor equipment within the City limits shall be determined and the location mutually agreed upon prior to access to the Public Beach. Use of Corporation Yards for storage shall be negotiated directly with the Director of Public Works separately from any Permit processing; compensation will be due the City. 8. A solid waste container of sufficient size shall be made available and conveniently accessible to Lifeguard Services so that debris removed from the Public Beach may be immediately and safely stored. This container shall be lockable with a duplicate key given to the Lifeguard Supervisor. Permittee shall be responsible for regular monitoring, maintenance and cleaning of this facility. 9. Permittee shall obtain special permission from the City Council for access and use of the Public Beach on City- recognized Holidays, Sundays, and, between the hours of 7:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M., Mondays through Saturdays, per Chapter 9.32 of the Municipal Code. 10. Advanced notifications shall be provided to the Office of the Lifeguard Supervisor (619) 633 -2748, a minimum of 48 hours prior to each access period through Moonlight Beach State Park. Notification shall include date (s) , time (s) , equipment types and duration of work. A single notification shall not include more than one week of work at any given time. 11. The access and use of any Contractor vehicle on the Public Beach shall be approved by the Engineering Inspector and Lifeguard Supervisor immediately prior to such access. 12. Permittee shall delineate the accessway through Moonlight Beach State Park to the satisfaction of the Engineering Inspector and Lifeguard Supervisor. When children are present, flagmen will be required to route Contractor traffic. Special consideration will be given when crowds are present, including prohibition of access. 13. Permittee shall not block at any time access to the Public Beach for emergency personnel or vehicles. 14. The operation of Contractor vehicles while on the Public Beach shall be conducted in a reasonable, safe and prudent manner. 15. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site to which access is authorized by this Permit, the permittee shall submit to and receive approval from the Traffic Engineering Division for the proposed haul route. The permittee shall comply with all conditions and requirements the Traffic Engineering Division may impose with regards to the hauling operation. bp4117 4283TE Conditions - Page 3/4 16. Prior to placement of any concrete product at the base of the coastal bluff, the permittee shall indicate to the Engineering Inspector what methods are to be used to dewater the job site. 17. Staging or repairs of equipment or supplies is prohibited on City Property or right -of -ways. Parking of personal vehicles on the Public Beach will not be- allowed. Offending vehicles will be cited and towed. 18. Any entrance gates used to gain access through the Publc Beach area shall be immediately locked after access. Any ruts or berm damage to sand areas shall be immediately and repeatedly repaired to remove any public safety hazards. 19. Permittee shall restore or replace on a daily basis any signage regulating handicap person's access, or any other signage, disrupted, damaged or destroyed by permittee's operations. Permittee shall repaint and restripe pavement markings as needed. 20. The proposed winter season berm and drainage system of Moonlight Beach State Park, when constructed, shall be maintained in good working order on a continuous basis, and any breach to the berm due to the operations of the permittee shall be properly filled or sandbagged before the end of the current low tide period. Any sand loss or damage resulting from the failure to maintain the winter berm will be at the expense of the Contractor to restore or repair, respectively. 21. Permittee shall remove debris from the Public Beach on a daily basis or within the maximum period of twenty -four hours from when requested to do so by the Lifeguard Supervisor or Engineering Inspector, whichever occurs first. 22. On Fridays preceding weekends when Special Activities are scheduled at Moonlight Beach State Park, Permittee shall cease operations and remove all equipment and personnel from the Public Beach by 5:00 A.M. All roadways, ramps and walkways shall be swept clean. 23. Prior to final inspection approval of this permit by e the Superintendent of Parks and Beaches, permittee Public Beach to the contours existing prior to issuance of this permit with the exception of the seawall itself. Permittee shall also repair damage to and thoroughly clean the asphalt pavement along the access route. bp4117 4283TE Conditions - Page 4/4 24. Prior to final inspection approval ermitts permit sha by the Superintendent of Parks and Beaches, p replenish all Public Beach sand lost due -to permittee's operations or compensate the Parks and Beaches Division by contributing to future sand replenishment projects. 25. Permittee shall direct all communications regarding this Permit through the Engineering Inspector, except as otherwise stated in these Conditions. ceived given outside this "chain "chainooflb for command „ instructions 26. Violations of any Standard or Special Condition will result in notification of the Sheriff's Department for appropriate action. A Stop Work Order on the Permit will be immediately issued by the Engineering Inspector or Lifeguard Supervisor. 27. These conditions do not exempt the Contractor or Agency of any future fees or charges for access through the Beach area. 28. Permittee has read, understands and agrees to comply with all Beach Encroachment Permit Standard and Special Conditions: j (Sign tur ermittee) (Date) (Name of Permittee Printed) (Position /Title) J bp4117 CITY OF ENCINITAS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: - `- . Community Services Staff FROM: sU Jesse Tench, Park and Beach Superintendent DATE: April 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Beach Area Improvements and Maintenance Notices The following work will be performed at various beach locations: Moonlight Beach May 01 -05 "B" Street Cul -De -Sac Improvements Existing disabled parking will be improved to meet ADA requirements. Work includes removal and installation of new concrete curbs, ramps and driveway within the cul -de -sac. Work is expected to be completed during this week. May 15 -20 Annual Sand Replenishment The winter storm berm will be graded down. Approximately 925 tons of new sand will be imported and graded over the week period. May 22 -25 Asphalt Sealing and Striping The asphalt of the upper parking lot, B & C Street cul -de -sacs, and interior walkways and driveways will be sealed and restriped. The two cul -de -sacs will receive design changes to provide passenger drop -off areas, two -way entry /exit, circular traffic flows. Work will be completed the Thursday before the Memorial Day Weekend. This work will take 2-3-days and may require no vehicle traffic and limited pedestrian access. A 72 -hour no parking notice will be posted in areas affected by work. Other Beach Areas Apr 24 - Spring Beach Debris Cleanup May 15 Bids are be gathered for this cleanup work. As soon as a contractor is selected, the work would be scheduled based on best tides. May 01 -25 Asphalt Sealing and Striping Swami's and Beacon's access parking areas will also received seal and stripe work. This areas will be schedule during this period with the 72 -hour no parking notices being posted in areas affected by work. This information is provided for your reference. if you have any conflicts with any work that is being planned, please let me know immediately so I may attempt to meet your requests. L i sec, 6TCo �m , Sep u ^� c.. 1 _ ko` Wk - Cs� o rsv�� U, - -- - -- - - - - -- -- - - - -- - - -- - -- - - -- - -- CA 7-7 - c3 Co CreS &Aj oarn Ce- I- l v i d e �_ _ � !�C�rvo v J - -e- 7 ur% 2 i _ /w 6:�S fo correc d4M . fo I bx- (+;r -4 / Ifs o //7 j - TY tc �: nl. (.t P. To /f 67e /1�A/4e Alt- u�✓ /Q co e "V) rS rh•t Ca�csr -- .� N , i �i�v ; �i ��r� /wr (p•�s TYVC . de b w4s5 �� o,✓�p _ r c 4P% es c v�� _ c C, � S CNSI cAi''VJ dVoK'S e P/ —C A - L4J , � N �✓6V e /�'l r �� !i� c � d/ -- c/t�\ of _ Ae- guar to SITf_ _5 411 be. Ae- �Q�SPawS�ai �j �l� Renov n - ej�- /l �c qct 6 7 j- P� e "OMTC .s:te--. C)P- fLl� e x�dry �aC 4e- 61 f e Ilu cevc re 17rvd - 1 ; APR 2 4 1995 S _ "CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of 12 1.22 County of On Cld/i'J� oCT, l -/ is before me, b ate Name and Title of Officer (e.g.. "Jane Doe. Notary Publk7 personally appeared ? 4rsonally Name(s) of Signers) known to me - OR - ❑ proved to me on the basis of tisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name( is re subscribe o the within instrument and acknawledged to me thao hhe /they executed the ,ja" his er /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by In er r signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), • • Randa G. Milljour or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, Comm. #1038151 executed the instrument. Q -�; NO PUBUC , , MF< R M , Comm. M WITNESS my hand and official seal. ------ 6/signature of Notary P OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Trustee _ El Guardian or Conservator - El Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Top of thumb here ❑ Other: Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: 0 1994 National Notary Association - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91309 -7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1- 800876-6827 a U - - 4, -- a - -_ i l b i i - x �U ,Four N, � �L( vJt <e enL r��e O - i s OgIrl e- a•�t�2�Sa�2 - -- on on Hai �1`�•z��G G�97 Sl l _ _ _ w y - — - -- ram- - M O 24 1995 ro ESdary C: :*z i d Board of Directors Date: April 24 19 9 5 Encinitas GRAD #1 c/o Engineering Department 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Petition to join GHAD #1 Re: Seabluff Property Gentlepersons: We hereby petition to have our property added to your district as soon as possible. Our property is located at: 4,7 9 N -yt p A y e Legal description from our tax bill, if available: Respec lly submitted, Tel. No. 1��3 � 'F� E� c�I' `-A p4 NOTE: PLEASE PRINT ALL INFORMATION CLEARLY & LEGIBLY. - - .. -- - .:r ,... ... . q,.,,, �._T,,,,. �„ �- j. �.,,, �.,,. f„ �...r �,.`.., �/„ w-•" i•. ip' �: �.. �,,,.,,,.«, r�.,,` w. �,,, �•,..>j, P, �` e. �, j•1''s.,�••�''�!'- �.`+.�,1,1:. ' "., .� :,�. `^' ti,,,.• w. '�..— ^ sr. �': .:. -tea ✓ �?�. °- .�.�. -�.� �"' �"° SAI'�GDIEGUFr0 JYA7jC BA1VIC% - �./'�`>- ry ',';,.°,�"*!� �"'' r"� ' "�`45�ENC(N AS E�CIUCEV/CR ''.�. .� ..P a+ .► .+.. .r ' Et F6 T.W '' �„ •.y "� °'?` 'i . ^ r , � .P r,q # T i ntia T cY ' TPrro1'ci E S'"`hn - 61"2 n � �� :.HA DER0811 E 6 . �,�rw 1-w "s. ,,,. -... ..• -.-•- r� �.,•.:��e ; ,:.- r�� > , - :..sue'- ;.r'��•,, .. mss` `....✓ ,.�" +"•F:•y, ..,r'„�.,�,�. a,.a., "y+°'r'r -';�✓ .,. tu': a Two- Tfrousand Do1T ars `r 4I�Al2 Oa0~ OEI` t _ ._ . �,- PRINCIPAL PAXABEeTO Est o Encinita _ ��.,- •' ?m ORMAPTIR'"Arun rmY UPOW SU RRBNOl1! -OFrTN IS�G6 70�3A /D,OF'R{C�PR OPQR yXINDOi�.S!•WtMILTVRIfY.IS ��/ROlS bAT!•Or'"�• - „ � N ten ISSU!`WI.TKAUTOMATIC RENK -OF MATURLEY FROM.TI MQ^ RTIPICA.TC TQTIMW'POR /RBIMILA R•PERiO6•VNLESSSILRRfiNDEREQ_BY' OWNER WITNIw, TIM DA`�S.APTER1. ° LL� �� ' ' MATURITY DAT C.� TNIS...OIPOSIi BlAR ?INTIRIS.T'A �,TRH RATCOF' - NNUM;F ROIM� DA -T E� OP,„ISSU WTO`MATURITY EXCEPT TMAT 11 kINTfiRIST - FOR' - ANY'RINBWAI- PCRIOOQ .IS.SUBJECP TO`CHANGE -BwrTH BANK UPOfY"WRITTEN NOTICE TO'DEPO SITOR MAILED AT LERST,THIRTY OAYSPR {OR'TO A TM C" � Z COMMENCEMENT OF.SUCH PlRIOOL AND.I2�THIS'DEPOSIT SH—Li- BEAR' INTBREST FOR,-A, PERIOD -Ono NOT MORE. TRAM`TER YB'ARSFROK THE: +` DATE OR >ISSUE' AND. SHALL NOT-BEAR INTEREST THERCARTEN.'TNIS DEPOSIT INCLUDING INTERESTRM61S ALL,PRESENT" ANO'FUTURE",•, CALIPORWA AHP.FEDBRAL, LAWS -- 'AND. ALW, PRKSENT AND: FUTURC'RULES ANDeREGULAT10N3 GFP - THIS BANK-- IHTERISL IS PAYAELZ TO- DFPOS{TOW. AT`. - r'A Interest Paid Monthly 0t= 700 =8557 -,' "' » ° "n "' " "ru rye..- ......,......� .u`0Q3308u■ �:'1a22`3a2LD: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT DEPOSIT ACTION FORM DATE APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PERMIT COORDINATOR V TO BE COMPLETE BY CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER CHECK NUMBER CASHIER INITALS ENGINEERING DEPOSIT ENGINEERING SECURITY CASHIER CODE _ ED CASHIER CODE _ SY PROJECT NUMBER MUST BE ENTERED PROJECT NUMBER AND APPLICANT NAME MUST INTO PROJECT NUMBER FIELD BE ENTERED INTO THE DESCRIPTION FIELD (F10 ON LAST SCREEN) PROJECT # AMOUNT PROJECT # AMOUNT i12 3 TOTAL ! e' �= TOTAL JERRY SCHNOEBELEN O /oj Ao 44L i �� G lfir E 4 I 1 5 USE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Ci of Encinitas Application No. Community Development Department Finance No. Planning Division Date of Application: 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, California 92024 -3633 PHONE: (619) 633 -2710 DEPARTMENT USE ONLY DEPOSIT APPLICATION $........ ADMIN. PERMIT $........ AMENDMENT DEPOSIT APPLICATION (DES /SPR, USE PER.) $........ SPECIFIC PLAN APPL $........ ANNEXATION $........ AMENDMENT $........ APPEAL $...••••• INITIAL DETERMINATION $........ BOUND. ADJUST. $........ TM $........ CERT. COMP. $........ Refiling Exp. Msp $........ BA /CC (within 6 mos. of exp.) $........ DESIGN /SITE REVIEW $........ Replacement $........ EIA(& NEG. DEC) $........ Cond. Amendment $........ EIR $......... Revised $........ REVIEW /AMENDMENT $........ FINAL MAP $........ NEGATIVE DEC. $ ........ Time Extension $........ GPA $........ TPM $........ MAJOR USE PERMIT $........ Refiling Exp. Map $........ PLNG. COMM. (within 6 mos. of exp.) INTERPRETATION $........ Replacement $........ PLAN DEV $........ Cond. Amendment (MAJ. USE PER.) $........ Revised $........ MINOR USE PERMIT $........ FINAL PARCEL MAP $........ REVERSION TO ACREAGE $........ VARIANCE $........ REZONE $........ OTHER $........ ROAD VACATION /OPENING $........ SIGN PERMIT TOTAL DEPOSIT $ DATE $........ SIGN PROGRAM APPLICANT - Please complete the following: Name: SC- k n e bF -1 Eti J e w �' Phone: (o l 9 1 l q,3 8218 (Last, First, Mi dle Initial or Name) Address: 7 PTvNr A ✓E City 5/N C-/w / T?` State CA Zip 7402 7 Engineer / Arehi te Y Name: S KE .L\q EA) (o I IJ(=...F I rJ l , Phone: (01 9 y Z 8379 Address: tD� i S V ylCAI) Avc City �n1 C1>U t�S State C Zip X202 ` Owners Name: . SC (\ D P- 6 F- l E fi Phone: 1 B2 (Last, First , �� Ir Middle Initial Firm Name) Address: (�7 f3 1Je 6✓ City �GrN I Tt5 State CA- zip 1 70 7 Project Name: Se,4wal/ A,-j4 /q ,1 - 1r�c� Gt/all l�ePtrr2 Project Parcel No.: 15G - 051 - Project Address: (9'7 S Between pf o i+NF- And ATifErJ A (Street) (Street) BW /04/FL4 V247wp5 (09- 06 - 91 \4) 1 ... ��.� = v= m'C"tih - wur..a. .� +tax —v .•nrx'��ST ^• 't!: ::Y ^•[i+.'�.- ��v- n- �......... .... ..�.....:- .e- .�...��a - _ � _ _ _ ,ave you had a pre - application meeting? (,X) Yes ( )No If yes, name of Planner P_ �IkA , A Has construction or use of the property for which this permit is requested started ?( )Yes (>(J No If yes, explain: I am able and intend to proceed with actual construction work and /or division of land in accordance with plans submitted herein within A.s. ffiQVA;bW' after approval. Applicant acknowledges that an application for a tentative map or tentative parcel map is not received pursuant to Government Code 65920 et seq. until environmental review is complete. All other application types are not de ed received until responses from interested agencies are received by the Ci y Signature, O r /Authorized Agent D to (Attach letter of auth.) Please Print or Type Signnator's Na / me Below e % PLEASE ATTACH A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE /PROJECT TO THIS APPLICATION. IF USE PERMIT, VARIANCE OR ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT, ATTACH PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM. ZONING INFORMATION ZONING DISTRICT: DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: MAXIMUM DENSITY (DU /AC): MID -RANGE DENSITY (DU /AC): MINIMUM LOT SIZE FLOOR AREA RATIO MAXIMUM HEIGHT LOT COVERAGE SETBACKS: FRONT YARD SIDE YARD EXTERIOR (ST. SIDE) REAR YARD LANDSCAPING COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD THOMAS BROS PG CENSUS TRACT NO. Project Description Gen. Plan Designation No. State /Coastal ( )yes ( )no Proposed Residential Units: Attached Detached No.of Lots Multi Acres Existing Zoning Related Case: ( ) Yes ( ) No Previous Case No. Accepted By Date BW /04/FL4- V247wp5 (09- 06 -91 \4) 2 SCHNOEBELEN 678 NEPTUNE APRIL 1995 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes to reconstruct an upper bluff retaining wall that failed on January 7, 1995. A preliminary review of the failure was performed by ACCUTECH Engineering Systems Inc and a geologic reconnaissance was performed by Michael Hart. These consultant reports are appended to this application. The failure has jeopardized a mid -bluff retaining wall on the southern half of the property. Currently, the bluff is actively sloughing and is a immediate threat to the public on the beach below and the stability of a retaining wall on the property to the north. The applicant also proposes to extend the existing seawall to elevation +36.5 MSL on the northern half of the property. The southern half of the seawall has already been extended to this height. This elevation will match the existing elevation of the walls on adjacent properties. The type of walls proposed are typical of the walls in the area. Both walls are necessary to stabilize the bluff and represent the minimum necessary to mitigate the hazard. PHOTO 1. Photograph one shows the upper bluff portion of the failure. The retaining wall in the foreground is on the southern half of the applicants property. The retaining wall on the right center of the picture is in front of the property to the south. The proposed upper retaining wall will extend from the northern property line to the existing wall. PHOTO 2. Photograph two shows the failure of the bluff. On the right hand side of the photo is the return section of the mid -bluff retaining wall that is currently failing from loss of lateral support. In the lower left hand side of the photo is the retaining wall on the property to the north that is in jeopardy due to loss of lateral support (out flanking). PHOTO 3. Photograph three shows the base of the failure. The top center of the photo shows the mid bluff retaining wall failing. The wall in the right center of the photo is the previous extension of the lower seawall. The photo also shows the soil and debris that is precariously perched over the beach below. PHOTO 4. Photograph four shows the existing seawall and the previous seawall extension to elevation +36.5 MSL. STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION The proposed project is compatible with structures on the adjacent properties. The proposed project will not adversely affect the adjacent properties. The proposed project will increase the stability of the property to the north. The proposed project will improve public safety. Access for the seawall extension will be from the beach. The upper retaining wall will be constructed from the bluff top on the applicants property. The project has been designed and engineered by licensed professional engineers. C� r Clay Of April 10, 1995 Mr. Jerry Schnoebelen 678 Neptune Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 Dear Mr. Schnoebelen: Mr.David Skelly dropped off one set of plans of your proposed repair and reconstruction of the bluff slope at 678 Neptune. The proposed repairs are of a magnitude to require a major use permit for the work. This is required in the City Ordinances oe for a is on prior bluff. A copy of the ordinance is attached. Please apply proper P to any work on the bluff. If you have any questions, please call me at 633 -2776. Sincerely yo s, Hans Carl i ensen Subdivision Engineer cc.: V Langager, Community Development D. Skelly, Skelly Engineering t ed paper ./ NOWAK- MEULMESTER & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 455.6681 FAX: (619) 453 -3947 / O %�' - �� C SHEET NO. OF BY ,S.! -( DATE �l � PROJECT (i�/� L G L -J R' � OE✓ JOB NO. ZS SI U�� I GPi•LL SI�'ccl'S ! Hrz I 10 VESS /p� o � G. LM STER F2 "' z 14330 * EXP. 3 -31 -97 CIVIL qTF OF CA`�FO �� Ear ?i1, M SA ./ NOWAK- MEULUBTER & ASSOCIATES 4` ,` STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 455 -6681 FAX: (619) 453 -3947 By DAT PROJECT 5GH //c7 SHEET NO. / OF JOB NO. q S oZ,s f+ �A/i %H F./4Fiiy y� ✓R..= = io ��` )r /% 5 LOl�Pg 2- T o T)oF N Gh/ WALL j FA i Lu/t.z PLAd� f I- <j ' . i '= C,oyo)Oz1.0 8.60 7)= 0 i o / .rJ o F H � 2 e k q . �� 9 0. 2 //.3( B.4 C : 57. q1 7 / Tjyv11DAy ( /So / _, DJJ(�Lc' coQ�oSia.J p�1a —�y ULfi nA i �A(�ac /77 l 2-7. S 5l��d #'t= -lam i, -✓ lr� �p-.J� ( ,� ` r �a� =L� ' :oo PSF PSF Tic p/q ,Q/✓�ffC,e 74- /n/ SA�J0 = 17 /(e.6- 7) 6A?Ac -;T7 - 2 (-/7)l ./ NOWAK- MEULMESTER & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 455 -6681 FAX: (619) 453-3947 BY S. N. DATE . 3�4 PROJECT �L✓ SHEET NO. z OF JOB NO. sA J0J'r0 , JC 1 _ � O'T/a (, L ElJ l O / �1c F1 �= k- P' = (3.3 0 0 � 0 �- 0 4- UJ 3 0,J O 'cD 4 �7 T/b 8 #- A�cfloR 8 ' C- gf4 Sti✓p 5 CA PAL- f ; ,l SA✓D 5 = Z C 77) C °. <-7) = 4 J 1 a i f( cJ 1 0 4 7 1,J SA J� sip ✓� : � ('' 4 _ ll, 05)( 41 l T (�l Sh�q sT�:�� T �=n✓ of / l� r — l t r3 °�D =p ID �LJ 4, r� z / x_ 33 p = I �, _ I D Y'j 1 t>'Q 7/,5 rtic top 1a � I 7'/✓cic (�C��s �: c.r� o,-� f J rz- DC DDIi, - .714c7 Avm, GL/tp �.lz 7 T�� l� �fiy alF (g,7�0 C. ✓J8- ✓o =��:3L r ./ NOWAK- MIEULMESTER & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS \ 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 455 -6681 FAX: (619) 453 -3947 B s +'I. DATE _ % �j PROJECT SCH tJ SHEET NO. 7 OF JOBNO. qs - -D25 ' 5 IT = 3 4,5 I) if X 1 L .STP./ c. J(i,�i� G o uL1 CPS - � /R �/ZcSS ✓Re �c/ar =�I /I Y ;�rGc �I.S/ SS 4 J A...l - GZy sx�Z - 47.z3 /rJ o . USE 4-ri'l- �/ 1 �fi,✓�S a L q X t ' K _' = I I / Z , -Z( 9. 4 -(- Wi„ - (73 -y) /,7 = Z3.1 FT_;uPl a•°�xS��.2x�c.2 � � M I 'j. G q V = /•7 C 9. 4J(�/Z1;.48 GPs ,. X ZZ- L 4. f/O JJ (pS S /, T U 5 J% 7C Pc o ./ NOWAK- MEULNIESTER & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 455-6681 FAX: (619) 453.3947 SHEET NO. d OF BY DATE PROJECT JOB NO. 5 � c� /Z. pr 3 Wes - CI•?�,': - 2.5;, 7) C..�J =r3_� �I =c 5 !I ~T 7 /oZ I-frS, 5 r-1 ps o, ./ NOWAK -MEULM ESTER & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 455 -6681 FAX: (619) 453 -3947 BY r/ PATE i�lS� PROJECT SG � - /Jp ; =�_ �� ?� c /4= SHEET NO. �_ OF JOB NO. -q :J PP�r� 1 NFi.� ' ;212 Z /.5"� /: c; /1 r'��5� ✓r_L = `i X 15'0 rD F, _ V1 (110 31(11) = s 2— L rj _ J I`Y 1 15 fl r \ 53, ; _ � 1A R � e % i � c� + r) L.�J � (j = S3, � 3 tips c Sl % 9 (r'•��.� ;- I / - �• ---- -? rl To TA y _ S r (��oc�J - r� (��J3�.1c�p� %3D' //� 3 a f3 K �'• 1 PS ��U �� L�.�l,�. _ lo b. °� „• �� ff � t3��t��) 7-j 7 L �s��lry = L �/ C� ° - =tom f L ( ✓III - - IQ =p�� (� ! ./ NOWAK- MEULNiESTER & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 (619) 455 -6681 FAX: (619) 453 -3947 San Diego, California 92121 By �S �/ DATE �/ S PROJECT SHEET NO. OF JOB NO. qS� o2S Tr : i• �l� C,� ' i 7 5 , S C Z'- U/J = J� t� j s r-7 p I- I DL = JS.y = s ./ NOWAK- MEULMESTER & ASSOCIATES ,`'\ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 455 -6681 FAX: (619) 453 -3947 BY DATE i� 5� PROJECT SHEET NO. OF JOB NO. _ �JS —oZS� r ,r ?r` 4xlz S7-r_f� Tip -4T,5�pJ 1 - 6 y h r o. ssr. 1.1,�1.1 5 U<< cl X 1Z - A��:JLj A 17 gLc� i�� SS�2� - Z x �.3 � X <oo,� = Saco P ��. J it U s e D Y ►�/i p p-� S�J Pc./- �= S X 8 X t %z NOWAK- MEULMESTER & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL ENGIN 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 455-6681 FAX: (619) 453 -3947 BY Ste=— DATE PROJECT - S ^ =`' ✓ = SHEET NO. cg OF JOB NO. 16 "I! Ca • C AS 7 /:j �L� c� ►%� V /•7 53vZ oytsz „�r t 1. 4 C9 1. 3q. c. w��s 7 C�I(i. °S I( rod /z = 55. ► Gr — '4x Z// i �+ 7 I G! /J.�r .� ."r l��%�v��' 2 ✓�5 �G -Sono �s d = I Z v - � 2 ,4 z � r I ^ -- ;/ gj c- 0. c- :5 L J r� Gi';'� = iooJ �s,_ j &��:JS r'l� =s�. _ (1scc -) 3 CS;r- (/7A, I., 55. US ./ NOWAK- MEULMESTER & ASSOCIATES �` �\ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 455 -6681 FAX: (619) 453.3947 BY If . DATE PROJECT SHEET NO. G� OF JOB NO. 2 .5�' Lam- y 4, -J4 7 cX l t r . ►J C.� -� c. ✓/k lei L� w a 7 3 /4- HIL4 " Hi - 1 / r 1 lfrR a =D �JD o n�l1- . e r 7- )� = C =9� °° °° c k R g / 2 , s 12_L - /L, i uSL --4r 4x 1z LA 4 ' I i i .fk�G J 5 �J =c i, J (U wF - ''T5 f =r o.17 . U �� p ,i 3 " . tl ./ NOWAK- MEULMESTER & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL ENGIN 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 455 -6681 FAX: (619) 453 -3947 BY DATE r C 4 PROJECT S 1 Da �� 5LJ �� '�'�'J� SHEET NO. / 0 OF JOB NO. LoldaP ie✓ar -1- /r f��J/'� P 3 , F r r BI ( o Z) = 1 =F = / og I-SF P, 9 ) tK r. 3nz .1± Jc 4.5+ � ,Z i = 1Z. EL az .a R - 1/Z (�•�j)(�) f 1, 33} - q ° :`,32:0 �f A,� � = 12.1 4.4- � _ 3" a 9 K 8z 3 °• = Gam• G �, = lSoa ' T I C b /r.�c /, ✓� - t+� �; =�i y Ir) Sh�� - S - S Fi l�si �rn�'cDl �P uc f ,J.�N o ri L- y h /j S� �D s -,,�/� _ (72. � g, Z 6TftG 1,.: �S N of /'��2 a' = 4 f-r-6 f 15��J�� r �� T( E, F"4- ' A cNorL G � 1'I c !?rte A.1 r° TAL i ZFds r 01C hIJI:POR -�' t �.°I 1 (�Je ✓o � c 49 Fr ./ NOWAK- NEULUMTER & ASSOCIATES �\'\ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 5830 Oberlin Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92121 (619) 455 -6681 FAX: (619) 453 -3947 BY DATE Q 1 PROJECT _ CG P, J�,= SHEET NO. �_ OF JOB NO, 571 —1✓1 = I c � � S = - l � � I 2 > � 1✓l a S� f � ,�rL. � d. D i J� ti J c C t=om.: r� TN� F>-.r� o f �� 5 � c. L i 0 7 S V 1 —� = `�`I Z� r�'GS�i ✓� hcril�� Gc ✓c�,.l S 1 � cJ Lrl? L \ rt uSF Sx�z �SSi�fS MICHAEL W. HART ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST File No. 183 -95 February 6, 1995 Accutech Consulting Engineers 9540 Waples Street, Suite F San Diego, CA 92121 Attn: Mr. Robert J. Randall Subject: Residential Property 678 Neptune Avenue Encinitas, CA GEOLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE Gentlemen: In accordance with our agreement I have completed a geologic reconnaissance of the sea -bluff located west of the subject residence. The results of this study indicate that the bedrock units underlying the bluff consist of Quaternary -aged marine terrace deposits and the Eocene -age Torrey Sand. The results of this study indicate that both of these units have the capability, from a geologic standpoint, of providing satisfactory support for the walls provided foundations and tie- back supports are properly designed. If you have any questions concerning the findings and conclusions of this report, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. PED GF Very truly yours, ��5 �pEL W y O CERTIFIED J 9p-+ ENGINEERING N GEOLOGIST Q . Michael W. Hart �9�. F 6I Qom' CEG 706 OF CAti�Fo 2 cc addressee P.O. BOX 261227 • SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA. 92196 • PHONE/FAX (619) 578 -4672 GEOLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE Purpose and Scoae This report presents the findings of a geologic reconnaissance of the sea -bluff located west of the residence at 678 Neptune Avenue in Encinitas, California (Figure 1). The purpose of this study was to describe the engineering geologic characteristics of the sea -bluff and to comment on the suitability of the exposed bedrock units as foundation materials for the proposed retaining walls. The scope of this study included geologic mapping of the sea - bluff, examination and geologic logging of an exploratory pit located near the base of the bluff, and a review of aerial photographs and readily available geologic literature. The scope of work did not include an evaluation of the stability of existing retaining walls or the sea -wall located at the base of the bluff. Site and Project Description The site consists of a gently easterly sloping residential lot with frontage of approximately 50 feet along Neptune Avenue. The rear yard and patio lie near the top 2 edge of an approximately 90 feet high sea -bluff that is supported at the base by an approximately 20 feet high sea wall constructed of reinforced concrete beams and timber lagging. The upper 70± feet of the bluff is partially supported by two tiers of timber retaining walls. The approximate northern half of the two upper walls failed in January of 1995 resulting in a loss of the surficial soils and ground cover, a portion of the rear yard that was supported by the upper -most wall, and a loss of backfill soil behind the wall located at mid - slope. It is proposed to replace the failed walls with engineered tie -back wall systems. It is understood that Accutech Consulting Engineers is currently evaluating several wall design options and are also performing geotechnical studies to determine soil strength parameters for foundation design. General _Geology The site is underlain by Pleistocene -age marine terrace deposits that are correlated with the Lindavista Formation and the Eocene Torrey Sandstone (Wilson, 1972). The nearly horizontal contact between these two units occurs approximately 17 feet above the current beach level, or three feet below the top of the sea -wall (Figure 2). The Torrey Sandstone consists of dense, moderately well- cemented light grey to nearly white medium - grained sandstone. This unit forms the near - vertical lower portion of 3 the sea -bluff that is now protected from marine erosion and supported by the previously described sea -wall. The overlying Terrace deposits consist of compact but essentially uncemented and nearly cohesionless medium to coarse - grained sand. Approximately 300 feet north of the site, the Torrey Sand is overlain by a thinly - bedded clay shale unit that has contributed to large -scale translational landsliding in that area. In order to determine if the shale bed was present on site a shallow observation pit was excavated near the top of the sea -wall (Figure 2b). The top of the Torrey Sand was exposed in the base of the excavation and consisted of dense, well- cemented medium - grained sandstone. An oblique aerial photograph taken in 1971 prior to construction of the sea -wall provides further evidence that the slide -prone clay shale unit is not present along this section of the coast (Figure 3). Bluff Recession A comparison of oblique and vertical aerial photographs taken in 1928, 1953, and 1971, as well as other photographs of adjacent areas, indicate that during the period between 1928 and the present numerous bluff - failures have occurred, chiefly in the terrace deposits. There are at least three principal factors that significantly affect bluff stability in the immediate area of the site: 1. The presence of weakly cemented to uncemented cohesionless sands. 4 2. The presence of high, excessively steep slopes. 3. Periodic blockfalls within the Torrey Sandstone that do not allow the overlying terrace slopes to equilibrate with their environment. It is also likely that groundwater is having an increasing adverse effect on unretained slopes as seepage along the contact between the permeable terrace sands and the less permeable Torrey Sand increases with increasing development and water usage east of the bluff. A determination of the average amount of bluff - retreat was not made because bluff erosion on -site and on adjacent properties has been or will be arrested by sea -walls and existing or proposed mid -slope retaining walls. In order for these walls to continue to protect property from erosion they must be properly designed and equally importantly, have a regularly scheduled maintenance program. Faulting Local and Recional Published geologic maps (Wilson, 1972) indicate that the closest faults to the site are minor faults that cut the Eocene aged Torrey Sandstone. These faults are relatively common and may be observed in the sea -bluff south and north of the site. Since the faults are not known to affect sediments younger than Eocene age and typically have displacements of only a few feet, they are not considered seismic hazards. 5 The closest active fault is the Rose Canyon Fault that lies approximately 2 miles off- shore. Recent studies have shown that the Rose Canyon Fault is capable of producing an M 6.5 earthquake. Such an event on this fault or other regional active faults in the southern California area could subject the site to moderate to severe seismic shaking. Conclusion and Recommendations 1. The results of this study indicate that the terrace deposits consist of massive to thinly- bedded light brown, medium - grained sands. Cementation is generally very light to absent, especially in the lower portions of the bluff. Based on visual observations of that portion of the bluff recently exposed by the surficial slope failure, the lithology of the terrace deposits is generally uniform from the bluff top to the contact with the Torrey Sand. Interbeds of clay, silt, or conglomerate, were not observed on site or on adjacent properties. 2. It is concluded that there are no geologic structures present that may represent unusual stability or construction problems. The wall contractor should be aware that caving conditions caused by the presence of cohesionless sands may be encountered during drilling of tie -backs and that groundwater may be encountered in some of the excavations and may exacerbate caving conditions. 6 3. Poor surface drainage is a major cause of bluff instability. Therefore, it is recommended that all surface and roof water be directed via swales or subsurface drains to the street. It is recommended that roof gutters, if not already in use, be installed on the residence. existing large -leaf iceplant .be removed and the slope 4. It is recommended that ction with a mixture of drought - tolerant plant species revegetated after wall constru with variable root depths. Irrigation of slopes should be only on a temporary basis in order to allow plants to become established. It is recommended that a landscape architect be consulted to provide recommendations for suitable plant materials and irrigation. 7 References Kennedy, M.P., 1973, Sea -Cliff Erosion at Sunset Cliffs, San Diego, California Geology, Vol. 26, No. 2. Kennedy, M.P., 1975, Geology of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, California, Bull. 200, California Division of Mines and Geology. Kuhn, G.G. and Shepard, F.P., 1984, Sea Cliffs, Beaches, and Coastal Valleys of San Diego County, Univ. California Press, p. 193. Wilson, K., 1972, Eocene and related geology of a portion of the San Luis Rey and Encinitas Quadrangles, San Diego County, California, unpub. M.A. thesis, Univ. of California, Riverside. Aerial Photographs U.S. Department Agriculture, 1953, 8 M 95 & 96 San Diego County, 1928, 37 -F2 Aerial Fotobank, 1971, Low -angle oblique, neg. 50, 475. 8 y • V 3�— 100 —R X 76 0. 92.77 �" X 4.0 EU R O'? 1 \ \, • `Q i1 � � � �O MAP 1 N0.57 96� \: \ o D 0 ; o \. Y 0 MAP NQ570 1 als 6 X ti V L5 X 59-5 \ \. •�• 97.5 t' I / 2 ` - ` \ \� 1 ' Et'� , Q � . : ,, , S cale: 1 " = 200... j 1 X 560 a M.15 1 63.7 C!7 - 3O SITE Qt c es.o 66.0 6.0 Z a� 56.5 at / x x oI X X99.0+ 5T.0 SOUTH COAST ARK UNIT NO.3 Et 4 I MAP NO. 1935 A rn i Q 69.5 D SITE PLAN AND GEOLO C NITnAS,CALIFORNIA NEPTUNE AVE. PROPERTY LEGEND Qls- - - - - -- Landslide Qt - - - - - -- Terrace Deposits Et - - - - --- Torrey Sand Figure 80— 60 -- Q Qt J U d CO X40 LL 0 see Fig. 2b 20 _T _ Et :;: Sea Wall 0 • L ;.e Figure 2a, Structure section through north portion of bluff \\ slough Qt Figure 2b, Detail through lower part of bluff and observation pit Scale: 1 = 10' Figure 2a & b r- _� f _ _ t;� f ) �_ r ` is � t� •� nom..,. .- i ir AK tn lz •' + i Ta •� I I, __.uaZ41:•'. N O CZ I F • .31 � � � 1 � r G f'l ?� j i— — - -r � jt�� 6 � � L t � � '. :) O i Nil 'r7'f (• ll '•y. • 1 1 )f vLi � - * er qJ. I,, }� I J I 1 . DATE: January 17, 1995 TO: Mr. Jerry Schnoebelen 678 Neptune Avenue Encinitas CA 92024 RE: Residence Located at 678 Neptune Avenue, Encinitas CA 92024 SUBJECT: Preliminary Review of Rear Slope Failure Dear Mr. Schnoebelen, Per your request, a representative of our firm visited the referenced site on Monday, January 16, 1995, to observe reported rear slope failure located behind (West of) the existing residence. Specifically, the request was due to concern by the owner of the present condition due to a slope failure that occurred during, and subsequent to, recent heavy rainfall. The concern was related to the safety of the remaining improvements, at both this site and neighboring sites, due to the observed condition. Upon arriving at the site, we observed a substantial hillside failure emanating from, and encroaching onto the rear yard, within ten feet (10') of the existing residence. Portions of the existing rear deck on both this site, and the neighboring site to the North, were undermined from the failure. The resulting slopes in the immediate vicinity of the residence were as steep as .75:1 (horizontal to vertical), and were near - vertical approximately forty feet (40') downslope where a "fissure" was observed. Water and sand migration were evident at this fissure, and active erosion of the slope was observed during our site visit. Based on the observed conditions, we believe that improvements at both this site, and the neighboring sites, are in jeopardy, and require emergency protection measures to reduce the likelihood of imminent massive failure, and to stabilize the slope to prevent continued erosion. A sound method of hillside support should be provided, with precautions utilized to ensure the safety of all workers. Project Ref.: 951044 -3 Page No. 1 9540 WAPLES STREET, SUITE F, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 It is our pleasure to be of professional service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can assist you further, please do not hesitate to call our office. Very truly yours, ACCUTECH ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC. Ala Robert J. Randall President �FtQF ESS pp GE000707 10 NN, cr RIR:gbs . c3 o z i c No. GE0007 7^ m -k G,Exp`� �o lF OF CAI.�E� Project Ref.: 951044 -3 Page No. 2 212-- 19993- 0186634�r� zs$ OFFICIAL RECORDS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE ANNETTE EVANS, COUNTY RECORDER 5 00 RF: 3.00 FEES: AF: 1.00 MF: 1.00 RECORDING REQUESTED BY R UNIONNLAND TITLE CO. CO AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO Jerrold F. Schnoebe'_en 678 Neptune Avenue Encinit -as, CA -92024 Order /Escrow No.: 23671CM Re: Loan Number: 913 - 538518 Payoff hate: 4/93 Borro::er: Schnoebelen V/1) FULL RECONVEYANCE ARM FINANCIAL CORPORATION A Corporation as Trustee under the Deed of Trust dated June 25, 1992, executed by Jerrold F. Schnoebelen and Linda L. Schnoebelen, husband and wife, as Trustor(s) , and recorded July 6, 1992, as Document No. 1992 - 0421347, Book - -, Page - -, Official Records in the office of the Recorder of San Diego County, California, having received from the present owner of the beneficial interest under said Deed of Trust and the obligations secured thereby a written request to reconvey by reason of the satisfaction of the obligations secured by said Deed of Trust, DOES HEREBY RECONVEY, without warranty, to the person or persons legally entitled thereto, the estate, title and interest now held by it under said Deed of Trust. Said Deed of Trust describes land in said County and State. Dated: October 28, 1993 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) PAM FINANCIAL CORPORATIO14, as Trustee I COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) f By: Estrelita Chamberlain Assistant Vice President On October 28, 1993, before me, B. Huber, personally appeared Estrelita Chamberlain, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she/ they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies) , and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the pers on(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature z�c/ (Seal) Huber, Notary Public rg/r102893r.2 B. HUBER COMM. #989014 T NOTARY PUBUGCALFORNIA SAN DIEGO COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 24,1997 RETURN TO: AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION 11119 N.TORREY PINES ROAD LA JOLLA, CA 92037 BETTY AUSEN LEAD CLOSER NATIONAL CORRESPONDENT (Space Above This Line For Recording Datal DEED OF TRUST LOAN NO. 930 - 141148 J THIS DEED OF TRUST ( "Security Instrument") is made on MARCH 24, 1993 The trustor is JERROLD F. SCHNOEBELEN AND LINDA L. SCHNOEBELEN, HUSBAND AND WIFE ( "Borrower'). The trustee is ARM FINANCIAL CORPORATION ("Trustee"). The beneficiary is AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION which is organized and existing under the laws of THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and whose address is 11119 N. TORREY PINES ROAD, LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92037 -1009 ( "Lender "). Borrower owes Lender the principal sum of SIX HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND AND 00 /100 Dollars (U.S. $ 650,000-00 ) This debt is evidenced by Borrower's note dated the same date as this Security Inst u 01 n t � NNote"), , which provides for monthly payments, with the full debt, if not paid earlier, due and payable on APRIL This Security Instrumentsecures to Lender: (a) the repaymentof the debt evidenced by the Note, with interest, and all renewals, extensions and modifications of the Note; (b) the payment of all other sums, with interest, advanced under paragraph 7 to protect the security of this Security Instrument; and (c) the performance of Borrower's covenants and agreements under this Security Instrumentand the Note. For this purpose, Borrower irrevocablyy rants and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale, the following described property located in SAN DIEG County, California: LOT 19 IN BLOCK "E" A PORTION OF BLOCK "F" IN SOUTH COAST PARK NO. 3, IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 1935, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 17, 1926, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON SHEET ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF MARKED EXHIBIT "A ". which has the address of 678 NEPTUNE AVENUE, ENCINITAS (Street, Cit California 202c44 ( "Property Address "); Form 3005 9190 CALIFORNIA-Single Family-Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT P. 1 "1 a Amended 8/91 -6R(CA) towel VMP MORTGAGE FORMS - 13131293 - 18001571.7 291 I�N�� INM'�ae� W �■ Y 1199CA8A800014 � Mre 1 fl 14� pIIN8 ■a 3 1 8 EXHIBIT A LOT 19 17 BLOCK "E" AND A PORTION OF BLOCK "F" IN SOUTH COAST PARK NO. 3, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 1935, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 17, 1926, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 19, BLOCK "E" OF SAID SOUTH COAST PARK NO. 3; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 19, BLOCK "E" TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THAT TRACT OF LA3D AS CONVEYED BY THE SOUTH COAST LAND CO. TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BY DEED DATED JANUARY 10, 1930 AND RECORDED IN BOOK 1731, ?AGE 256 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE SAID EASTERLY LINE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 19, BLOCK "K "; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY PROLONGATION TO THE SOUTH - NESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 19, BLOCK "E "; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 19, BLOCK "E" TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION, IF ANY, HERETOFORE OR NOW LYING BELOW THE MEAN HIGH TIDE OF THE PACIFIC OCEAN. I f a' i i _ A�N �-- .. _ -.' � -__ - _. ( ♦ � -. i= 'ice♦ K , r CZth O f Encinitas March 19, 1997 Mr. Jerrold F. Schnoebelen 678 Neptune Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: Your undated correspondence (received on February 26, 1997) of 6 pages with 17 exhibits and your March 13, 1997 handwritten correspondence. Dear Mr. Schnoebelen: This letter is provided in response to your correspondence referenced above. In reviewing your letters and the City files, I have found no evidence that you have complied with the requirements for a major use permit which is required pursuant to Municipal Code Section 30.34.020. The only record of any City issued permits relative to work on or near the bluffs or the beach at 678 Neptune Avenue are a beach encroachment permit and a grading permit issued by t�e City Engineering staff. The December 31, 1996 letter from Hans Jensen attached to your correspondence as Exhibit 16 indicates that "Final inspection of Permit 4283TE,�a thorizing access across the public beach to a jobsite on adjacent private property, has been concluded to the satisfaction of the Field Operations Division, Engineering Services Department." In a conversation with Mr. Jensen on March 4, 1997, he assured me that Permit 4283TE was solely for removal of debris from the beach. The debris in question was associated with the failure of the bluff at your property. On March 19, 1997, Mr. Jensen indicated that Grading Permit 4283GR is not completed since additional materials need to be submitted. You have indicated in your correspondence that you have completed work on the bluffs and replaced a stairway. I refer you to Exhibit 5 of your submittal, a May 8, 1995 letter signed by me. Contrary to assertions in your letter, the exhibit summarizes our May 5, 1995 meeting and advises various City staff of the results of the May 5 meeting. The letter also cites coastal development permit 6 - 85 - 396 and the requirement that "The applicant shall contact the Coastal Commission office at such times to determine whether such repairs or activity may require a coastal development permit." Any emergency work completed on the face of the bluff requires that you receive an emergency coastal permit from the State of California Coastal Commission. No evidence of that permit or exemption from permit TEL 019 -0? -2600 F. 619- 633 -20 - ; S. Vulcan _Av Cnur. Encinitas. (,alik)rnia 9- TDD 019 - 033 -2-00 recycled paper requirements has ever been submitted to this office. My May 8, 1995 letter to you also authorizes "...the City Engineer ... to process your access permit for any lawful work on the bluff..." The referenced undated correspondence from you discusses City staff interaction with Mr. Ted Gildred. Mr. Gildred and Mr. Tom Tucker of Dyson and Dyson Real Estate came to City Hall as part of their due diligence investigation. In my conversation with them, Mr. Gildred indicated that he had made an offer on your property and was interested in the condition of the bluffs. He was given the complete file (Major Use Permit application 95 -106) for his review. Then, on February 10, 1997, at the request of Mr. Tucker, Diane Langager, Associate Planner and Project Manager for your application, sent the enclosed transmittal form and the documents cited on the transmittal form to Mr. Tucker. All information reviewed by and given to Mr. Tucker is a matter of public record. You also pose 12 questions in your undated correspondence. I will do my best to answer all of the questions. Mr. Artim is a geotechnical consultant to the City who reviews geotechnical reports. City consultants do not deal directly with applicants in order to remain objective. All appropriate information has been submitted by staff to Mr. Artim. The soils report for the backfill has not been submitted to him since it would be of no substantial benefit to submit the report at this time. In Mr. Artim's last response (dated June 23, 1995), he requested that geotechnical information be certified and submitted in a specific format. That information has not been submitted as of this date. If we submitted the soils report for the back fill at this time, Mr. Artim could review it, write another report and expend additional funding. Staff did not feel it appropriate to spend additional sums from your account since the information previously requested had not been submitted. Once the information requested by Mr. Artim has been submitted he will be asked to review all information. Mr. Artim advised the City on March 7, 1997 that he has not received any messages, either oral or written from Southern California Soils. He has received messages from you, but has not returned those calls since it was his understanding, and the general practice of all City consultants, that he was only to discuss technical solutions with your qualified consultants. Exhibit 13, my letter to you dated January 18, 1996 discusses the stairs and makes reference to other needed material.. The information requested in that letter has not been submitted. Your exhibit 15 was not responded to since you had previously stated in your November 8, 1995 letter (exhibit 12) that : "All I am doing is repairing the steps that fell again in January, 1995 ". I did not want to use moneys in your account to respond to a letter that you had written to dispute an earlier letter written by you. The evidence submitted to date indicates that the stairs are in violation of the Municipal Code and the Local Coastal Program regulations since they are in a different location than previously constructed and material used is different from the previous stairs. Under Coastal regulations, the replacement of 20 percent or more of the materials of an existing structure with material of a different kind constitutes replacement, not repair. Replacement of a stairway is generally not authorized on the coastal bluff. All time spent on your application, including the time spent reviewing the administrative record and writing this reply is being charged to your account. Additionally, the deposit account balance for Mr. Artim has been depleted due to the amount of time he has spent on the project as evidenced by the various letters in the administrative record. Since an unusual amount of time has elapsed between the original submittal and any additional work which may be needed by the environmental consultant, Mr. Hinshaw has advised that additional funding will be needed for his firm to complete their review once a complete application has been submitted. I recommend that $500 for the account of each consultant be provided, for a total of $1000. Again, the permit finaled by Engineering was for beach encroachment purposes. The major use permit is still required by the Municipal Code and Local Coastal Program regulations. The environmental consultants cannot finish their review until the third party geotechnical review by Mr. Artim is complete. Mr. Artim cannot complete his review until all information discussed above is submitted by qualified consultants. Mr. Skelley has processed several seawalls in Encinitas and is aware that the City and Coastal Commission requires concrete to blend with the bluffs as much as possible. Mr. Jensen has reviewed every seawall constructed since his employment with the City, his advice to color the wall to match the sandstone was appropriate. The Community Development Department has not issued a permit, thus we have not been able to condition the permit relative to color of the concrete. The wall and stairs were repaired and/or replaced without proper permits; if permits are issued, appropriate conditions will be assigned to the permit. In accordance with State open meeting laws, the City Council can only meet as a group when an item is on a posted agenda. In order to have your use permit application on the City Council agenda, the Planning Commission, as the land use decision making body for the City of Encinitas, would first have to render a determination. Incomplete applications only go to the Planning Commission in order to have the Commission deny the application. Your application as discussed in previous correspondence cited above is incomplete. With consideration given to the history of your application, staff will place the item on the Planning Commission agenda if all required information is not submitted prior to May 1, 1997. If the Planning Commission denies your application, you may then appeal that determination to the City Council. Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 1. 12, the City Council may affirm the Planning Commission's action without a hearing or direct staff to set the appeal for a hearing. If the appeal is set for a hearing you will then be able to address your concerns to the City Council. You indicate that you are not adverse to meet with me to discuss the status of your application; with consideration given to the history of the application, the meeting would only be productive for City staff if you retain a qualified engineering or geotechnical consultant to attend the meeting. Upon retention of the qualified consultant, please have the consultant contact me to arrange the meeting. The consultant should review the case file prior to a meeting with City staff, specific attention should be given to the letters cited on the transmittal to Mr. Tucker. It is customary for staff to respond to letters relative to development applications. I am sending copies of this letter to the City Council and City Manager for their review; should they wish clarification or need additional information, the Council members or City Manager will contact you. City staff looks forward to working with your consultants to complete the project. However, as noted above, if all necessary information is not available to process the application by May 1, 1997, staff will place the application on the agenda of the Planning Commission with a recommendation to deny the application. Sincerely, Bill Weedman City Planner enclosure: Copy of February 10, 1997 transmittal letter to Mr. Tucker of Dyson and Dyson (the letters cited on the transmittal on in the application file). cc: Mayor and City Council City Manager Hans Jensen, Engineering Diane Langager, Community Development Lee McEachern, Coastal Commission Ernie Artim Philip Hinshaw Code Enforcement 7� NIT �3 /Gj� 915,? 17 p.i� °.� 00 Lt A' .tS�GN_. /c,a diLo�.1 - - - - -- THIS WAS INDIVIDUALLY ADDRESSED TO ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS .►� �A-? tea_._ -_ ._ __ _ . ___._.. —�__ .__.__. -_. _.__.__- ._____ _. _- - - - -- -- Lll�w art Tz MA� ---- -. - - -- -- Ltu � ci yev__ /�k�I __ �,o ce�� __aF !� / k M !t! y Gam" ?ate �..�iGSa Tj_o� LAX— ../�zlrw�2 � y yU�S�r /�J S .. Ufa c✓ . iliv�.!/ i iyz�. G}2�5 .._ !. i _ - T7. .� O G l 7 6.7 Gam, /� C� r��, G� ,��•/N —,744 sS F-'6M cdl 7T/ _._ o v I i 1 i2 u. tT f�!ZmC� S S , �'�•4+= Gi - G'�'�._ �.G _ ..1-� 7 -� AZI Rsw _ f . 0 c5�- fie. ��`z;�'e`'� �- NGT_- � ✓tics- �4$[.� _� - -5` �— _�� - - - -My - - -7714-C - . __ r=. 20 L. G� Q , _. lLl.' io 7 c MA (A) rte .a -_ y -- - - .. (.v_4 r -�.S_. -�.. (..�.:. (Tt.1 -0 c� �.._ . � 1 6 s�G•�� S :��_ � _ - . -TE'd� __.../4r��GcSS S L Af Cf. 7 F40 G moj LIZ l r-k s 7 ivl TN�-T % -(:� / "j lG. AA =s �k r„� J C1 u v M s0,-�, Eb vi ALc- pcotiS T c. 2c,: 7 �►- TRANSMITTAL FORM FAX: 633 -2818 CITY OF ENCINITAS Community Development 505 S. Vulcan Avenue Engineering Encinitas, CA 92024 -3633 Fire Administration Fire Prevention Public Works DATE: February 10, 1997 SENT VIA: PICK -UP TO: Mr.Tom Tucker Dyson & Dyson Real Estate 12750 Carmel Country Road, Suite 113 San Diego, CA 92130 FROM: Diane Langager, Associate Planner PHONE: 619/633 -2714 ❑ Call ASAP ❑ Review & Call ❑ Review & Return F.Y.I. ❑ Please Handle Per Our Conversation ❑ Please Reply by As Requested Mr.Tucker: Attached please find a copy of the following items which summarize the status of Case No. 95 -106 MUP/EIA related to 678 Neptune Avenue. 2/27/96 Notice of Violation and Order to Abate 1/18/96 letter from Bill Weedman, City Planner 8/17/95 letter from Bill Weedman, City Planner 6/23/95 and 5/18/95 Third Party Geotechnical Review prepared by Ernest R. Artim As noted in the above - referenced attachments, additional geotechnical information is required to complete the project review, which includes Third Party Geotechnical Review and Environmental Review. Upon submittal of the required information, the project accounts will be reviewed to determine if additional funds are required for completion of the review process. As we discussed, the preceding is attached in order to give you a summary of the project status; additional information may be required upon detailed review of the application. The issues addressed in the items noted above relate only to City of Encinitas processing requirements. Authorization for the project is also required from the California Coastal Commission. It is strongly recommended that you also contact Lee McEachern of the Coastal Commission staff (521 -8036) to fully ascertain the project status. cc: Bill Weedman, City Planner -' C'itl' ( Encinitas December 31, 1996 San Dieguito National Bank 135 Saxony Road Encinitas, CA 92024 Re: Beach Encroachment Permit 4283TE {678 Neptune Av /Schnoebelen, Jerrold F. & Linda L. } A.P.N. 256- 051 -07 Release of damage deposit Final inspection of Permit 4283TE, authorizing access across the public beach to a jobsite on adjacent private property, has been concluded to the satisfaction of the Field Operations Division, Engineering Services Department. Therefore, release of the damage deposit is merited. Certificate of Deposit S 3308, issued April 24, 1995, and in the amount of $2,000.00, has been endorsed by the City's Finance Manager and released to your office for payment to the depositor. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact Jeff Garami, in writing, or by fax at (619) 633 -2818. Sincerely, y - H - a 4 ns C Jensen Senior Civil Engineer Subdivision Engineering cc Leslie Suelter, Financial Manager Jerrold Schnoebelen (point of delivery) enc HCJ /jsg/4283TE.doc 1 1'El. ��1�) ��;� '��uu F:�X ��l';� -��; '�,_� ;u5 ti. �'uk;in ��aem��. F.noniias. California 92 02 -+ -3633 TDD 019 - 033 -2 - 00 recycled paper • Bill Weedman, City Planner I have complied with all written and oral requirements for the Major Use Permit. City Engineering signed off in December 1996. If there are any new or contrived requirements, please communicate them to me in writing. I then will request a meeting with the City Manager and the full City Council. I will be represented with my counsel. The buyer of my property questioned someone's statements and letters from your department which caused him to cancel the purchase of my property. Not one that wants to litigate, I request a statement from you, in writing, as to what the buyer was told and what paper work was submitted to him. The first part of this letter is a chronicle of events that applies to your City Planning Department. During a major storm on January 7, 1995, the north Y2 of my upper bluff • retaining wall failed. The failure caused all the crib walls, vegetation and my stairs, both above the lower seawall and on the seawall to collapse. The City sent me a letter (exhibit 1) stating if I wanted to replace the fallen structures I needed a "major use permit ". I met with you, Lauren Wasserman, Alan Archibald, Hans Jensen and my engineer, Dave Skelly, to arrange emergency permits to start construction to ease the chance of a total bluff failure and to insure the safety of my home. In that meeting you asked if I would complete the major use permit process. I answered, "To the best of my ability ", because I had no idea what was involved. You also asked if I was going to replace my stairs and I responded, " I do not know yet, it depends on how much money I have left after rebuilding the fallen structures." Two days later I contacted Diane Langager to start the emergency permit process. She stated to me that I had to have a Major Use Permit and I 1 NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText NoText