FY 2009-10 through FY 2014-15 CIP and Fin Plan
City of Encinitas Cardi f f • Leucadia • Old Encini tas • New Encini tas • Ol i venhain San Dieguito Water District Fiscal Years 2009-10 through 2014-15 Capital Improvement/Work Project
Program and Financial Plan Station 3, 801 Orpheus Avenue, Leucadia Opened on June 17, 2009; Phase 1 of the Fire Station Construction Capital Improvement Project Station 1 Station 2 Station
4 Station 5
This page is intentionally left blank.
City of Encinitas San Dieguito Water District California Fiscal Years 2009-2010 to 2014-2015 Capital Improvement Program and Financial Plan Issued by the Finance Department 505 South
Vulcan Avenue * Encinitas, California, 92024 * 760-633-2600 www.cityofencinitas.org Photography: Photography by City of Encinitas staff. About the Front Cover: Station 3, 801 Orpheus
Avenue, Leucadia. Photography by Fire Dept Staff Copies of the document are available on the City’s Website and at the City of Encinitas Front Lobby i
City of Encinitas and San Dieguito Water District Fiscal Years 2009-2010 to 2014-2015 Capital Improvement Program and Financial Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction Page City
Manager’s Transmittal Letter About the City of Encinitas ..............................................................................................................................................
.... 1 -1 Budget Philosophy................................................................................................................................................................
1 -2 Purpose of the Six-Year Financial Plan and Capital Improvement Program. ....................................................................... 1 -3 Financial Planning Process -Process
for Two Year Budget and Timeline ........................................................................... 1 -4 Financial Plan Assumptions...........................................................
....................................................................................... 1 -8 (Significant Economic Impacts – Revenues Assumptions) (Expenditure Assumptions -Personnel,
Non-Personnel, Debt Service, Water and Sanitary Enterprise Funds) Document Format .....................................................................................................................
............................................ 1 -17 Summary of the Financial Plan.......................................................................................................................
...................... 1 -20 City and District Funds ..................................................................................................................................................
....... 1 -21 Summary of the Capital Improvement Program.................................................................................................................... 1 -25 Basis
of Accounting.............................................................................................................................................................. 1 -26 Basis
of Budgeting................................................................................................................................................................ 1 -26 Recognitions/Awards.
........................................................................................................................................................... 1 -26 Chapter 2 – Six-Year
Financial Plan Summary of All City and District Funds Approved Budget Summary of All City and District Funds (Schedule A’s) Fiscal Year 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 .. 2 -2 General Fund
Expenditures by Department/Division FY2009-10 and FY2010-11 (Schedule C)……………………………. 2 -8 Six-Year Financial Plan Summaries by Fund (Funds with asterisk provide funding for capital or
work projects) General Fund (Fund 101)*....................................................................................................................................................
2 -10 Self Insurance Fund (113)..................................................................................................................................................... 2
-12 Special Projects Fund (119)*................................................................................................................................................ 2 -13
ii
Chapter 2 – Six-Year Financial Plan Summary of All City and District Funds – Continued Recreation Programs Fund (Fund 146).............................................................................
.................................................... 2 -14 Civic Center Improvements (Fund 152)* ......................................................................................................
........................ 2 -15 Gas Tax Fund (Fund 201).................................................................................................................................................
.... 2 -16 Federal Capital Grants (Fund 202)* ..................................................................................................................................... 2
-17 State Capital Grant Funds (Fund 203)* ................................................................................................................................ 2 -18 Transnet
Fund (Fund 204)* .................................................................................................................................................. 2 -19 Transportation
Development Act Fund (Fund 205)* ............................................................................................................ 2 -20 Coastal Zone Management Fund (Fund
210)* ...................................................................................................................... 2 -21 Community Development Block Grant Fund (Fund 222)*………………………………………………
…………........... 2 -22 Affordable Housing Fund (Fund 225)* ................................................................................................................................
2 -23 Encinitas Housing Authority (Fund 226)…………………………………………………………………………………... 2 -24 H.O.M.E. (Fund 227)………………………………………………………………………………………………............. 2 -25 Governmental/Educational
Access Fund (Fund 228)............................................................................................................ 2 -26 Recycling/Solid Waste/Household Hazardous Waste
(Fund 229) ........................................................................................ 2 -27 Park Development Fees (Fund 231) ............................................................
......................................................................... 2 -28 Flood Control Fees (Fund 232)*.........................................................................................
.................................................. 2 -29 Traffic Mitigation Fees (Fund 233)* ..........................................................................................................
.......................... 2 -30 Parkland Acquisition Fees (Fund 234)* ...............................................................................................................................
2 -31 Open Space Fund (Fund 235)* ............................................................................................................................................. 2 -32
Recreation Trail Fees (Fund 236) ......................................................................................................................................... 2 -33 Community
Facilities (Fund 237)*....................................................................................................................................... 2 -34 In Lieu Public Improv
Fees (Fund 238)................................................................................................................................ 2 -35 In Lieu Underground Utilities (Fund
239)............................................................................................................................ 2 -36 RTCIP (Regional Arterial System) Fee (Fund 241)
.............................................................................................................. 2 -37 Asset Forfeiture (Fund 261), State Special Law Enforcement (262),
& Federal Special Law Enforcement (263) ............. 2 -38 Fire Mitigation Fees (Fund 272)............................................................................................................
............................... 2 -39 Village Park Municipal Improvement District (Fund 290) ...................................................................................................
2 -40 Villanitas Municipal Improvement District (Fund 291) ........................................................................................................ 2 -41 Cerro Street
Municipal Improvement District (Fund 292) .................................................................................................... 2 -42 Encinitas Lighting and Landscaping
District-Citywide (Fund 295)*.................................................................................... 2 -43 Wiro Park Municipal Improvement District (Fund 296) ...........................
............................................................................ 2 -44 Encinitas Lighting and Landscaping District-Encinitas Ranch (Fund 297) .............................................
............................. 2 -45 iii
Chapter 2 – Six-Year Financial Plan Summary of All City and District Funds – Continued Encinitas Public Financing Authority – Debt Service (Fund 321) .................................................
....................................... 2 -46 Cardiff Sanitation District Funds (Funds 501, 502, 503, 504 and 506)*...............................................................................
2 -47 Encinitas Sanitary Division Funds (Funds 521, 522, 523, and 525)* ................................................................................... 2 -48 San Dieguito Water District
Funds (Funds 531, 533, 534, 535, 536 and 537)*.................................................................... 2 -49 Pacific Pines Fund (Fund 561)……………………………………………………………………………………...............
2 -50 District Services Fund (Fund 616)…………………………………………………………………………………............. 2 -51 Fleet Maintenance Fund (Fund 692)............................................................................
......................................................... 2 -52 Vehicle Replacement Fund (Fund 693) ...................................................................................................
............................. 2 -53 Chapter 3– Consultant Services and Studies Consultant Services and Studies Summary Sheet...........................................................................
....................................... 3 -1 Consultant Services Individual Projects ..................................................................................................................
............. 3 -2 Chapter 4– Drainage Projects Drainage Project Summary Sheet ........................................................................................................................
................. 4 -1 Drainage Individual Projects ................................................................................................................................................
4 -2 Chapter 5– Wastewater Projects Wastewater Project Summary Sheet...................................................................................................................................
.. 5 -1 Wastewater Individual Projects ............................................................................................................................................ 5
-2 Chapter 6– Public Facilities Public Facilities Project Summary Sheet..............................................................................................................................
6 -1 Public Facilities Individual Projects ..................................................................................................................................... 6 -2
iv
Chapter 7 – Parks and Beaches Parks and Beaches Project Summary Sheet..........................................................................................................................
7 -1 Parks and Beaches Individual Projects ................................................................................................................................. 7 -2 Chapter
8 – Streets and Rail Corridor Streets and Rail Project Summary Sheet ...............................................................................................................................
8 -1 Streets and Rail Individual Projects...................................................................................................................................... 8 -2 Chapter
9 – Water Projects Water Project Summary Sheet ..............................................................................................................................................
9 -1 Water Individual Projects ..................................................................................................................................................... 9
-2 Chapter 10 – Unfunded/Underfunded Proposed Projects List of Unfunded Projects ......................................................................................................................
............................... 10 -1 Chapter 11 – Comprehensive CIP Report Comprehensive List of all Active Capital Improvement Projects .............................................................
............................ 11 -1 Chapter 12 – Capital Project Summaries Summary Schedule of Capital Expenditures by Major Category, Fiscal Years 2009-10 and 2010-11 ................................
12 -1 Pie Chart Summary of Capital Expenditures by Major Category, Fiscal Years 2009-10 and 2010-11 ................................ 12 -2 Summary Schedule of Capital Expenditures by
Revenue Sources, Fiscal Years 2009-10 and 2010-11 .............................. 12 -4 Pie Chart Summary Schedule of Capital Expenditures by Revenue Sources, Fiscal Years 2009-10 and
2010-11 .............. 12 -6 Capital Projects by Total………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 12 -8 v
vi Chapter 13 – Appendices Summary of FY2008/09 City Council Goals and Work Tasks ............................................................................................. A -1 Priority
Tiers for Capital Improvement Projects ................................................................................................................... B -1 Long Term Obligations
and Capital Leases .......................................................................................................................... C -1 City Council Reserve Policy – General
Fund........................................................................................................................ D -1 Resolutions of Adoption .............................................
.......................................................................................................... E -1 Glossary ..............................................................................
................................................................................................. F -1 Index ..........................................................................................
........................................................................................... G -1
May 20, 2009 Six-Year Capital Improvement Program and Financial Plan Transmittal Letter To the Honorable City Council and Citizens of the City of Encinitas: I am pleased to present the
City and San Dieguito Water District’s (SDWD) six-year Capital Improvement Program and Financial Plan for Fiscal Years 2009-10 through 2014-15. This is a long-term strategy developed
to demonstrate fiscal sustainability and to plan for the construction and replacement of infrastructure and other capital assets, incorporating the goals and priorities set by the Council
at their Strategic Goal Setting Session in January 2009. These are challenging times. The primary focus of this plan was to continue to provide high quality services and to implement
the City’s robust capital plan in the face of a severe economic recession, while retaining future fiscal sustainability. The six-year Capital Improvement Program and Financial Plan depicts
the financial forecast of the City and SDWD, incorporating all operating and capital costs, debt service payments and interfund transfers. The proposed financial plan is balanced in
all six-years and maintains reserves at the target levels established in the Council’s Reserve Policy. This has been accomplished by developing realistic budget assumptions, implementing
strategic cuts, and prioritizing the capital plan, while focusing on the Council’s highest priorities of insuring public safety, maintaining the City’s sizeable infrastructure system
and providing core services to residents and businesses on a continuing basis. The combined budget (all City/San Dieguito Water District funds) totals $83.2 million, with an additional
$5.8 million going toward the construction of capital improvements throughout the City. The proposed budget for the General Fund – the City’s largest and most discretionary fund --totals
$46.6 million, with projected revenues of $50.3 million. Overall, the General Fund revenues are expected to decrease by 3% over the previous year and operating expenditures will decrease
by 3% as well. As we enter this new fiscal period (Fiscal Year 2009-10), the economy remains in a precarious and volatile state. The region and nation as a whole have been in an economic
freefall since last September. Nationally, real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has decreased three quarters in a row, beginning 3rd quarter of 2008, with continued decline expected in
the current quarter (2Q 2009) and following quarter (3Q 2009). The California economy has experienced a deeper downturn than the U.S. economy, and the uncertainty
of the future is heightened by the reluctance of the State to impart fundamental change in state government finance, and the voters increasing frustration with the dysfunction in Sacramento.
The San Diego County economy has been impacted by the depression in housing values, the unprecedented collapse of credit availability, a decrease in the rate of income growth, and historically
low consumer confidence. Although the rate of decline of the economic contraction appears to be decelerating, current economic indicators remain mixed. Unemployment in San Diego County
is currently at 9.3% (compared to 11.2% for California) and is expected to rise further in the next year, and the retail sector will likely suffer through another year of weak sales.
There are, however, some positive indicators for our City. Based on preliminary information from the County, total assessed valuation appears to have increased over the past year. The
number of housing sales continues to remain strong and the housing market appears to be stabilizing. The City is characterized by very strong wealth and income indicators, with median
household income 157% of the national average. In addition, the City’s credit rating was currently reevaluated by Standard and Poor’s (S&P) and increased from AA to AA+. S&P also issued
the highest qualitative ranking of “strong” for our financial management, meaning that our practices are strong, well-embedded, and likely sustainable. Overall, the economic environment
in San Diego County is expected to remain weak throughout 2009. Economists at the UCLA Anderson Forecast believe we may be nearing the bottom of this recession, but that recovery will
be slow, with economic expansion beginning in 4th quarter 2009 and continuing a slow path of recovery throughout 2010. In light of these economic times, we believe that the attached
financial plan includes realistic revenue assumptions. Property taxes (the City’s largest revenue source) are expected to increase slightly over last year and continue to increase over
the following five years, but at the slowest rate of growth in the City’s history. Sales Taxes (the City’s second largest revenue source) are expected to decrease significantly next
year, stay at depressed levels in the second year and then gradually begin to recover. Due to the past prudent fiscal practices and policies of the city Council, coupled with strategic
cuts, we have been able to present a balanced, financially sound plan. While many other cities are projecting deficits and implementing service reductions, our six year plan demonstrates
fiscal sustainability without cutting services and programs. Several cost saving measures have been implemented to achieve this budget. First, the City and Water District Department
identified over $1.6 million in savings in the current fiscal year (FY2008-09). They were able to achieve this by carefully monitoring their quarterly spending plans and continually
seeking more cost-effective ways to provide service. These reduced Departmental budgets provided the “baseline” for developing next year’s budget. To reduce further expenditures, several
positions were left vacant, many contract positions were reduced or eliminated and no cost-of-living adjustments were budgeted beyond the terms of the current labor contracts. In addition,
all capital projects were prioritized against set of criteria and ranked. Available capital funding was allocated first to the highest priority projects and in some cases previously
appropriated funding was reallocated from lower priority projects to higher priority projects.
While meeting the ongoing needs and expectations of our customers, we are careful not to neglect our core assets and infrastructure, which would result in more costly repairs in the
future. Ongoing funding is included for annual pavement overlay, traffic safety and calming projects, storm drain repairs, information technology upgrades and water and sewer improvements.
For the first time this year, we have added our sizeable information technology system to our list of core infrastructure, thereby emphasizing the importance of this system to the successful
operation of our City and ensuring priority funding. In closing, I would like to thank the City Council for your leadership throughout the year and for your direction on development
of the budget through your prioritization of strategic objectives as well as your careful deliberations during the budgeting process. Encinitas has continued to grow and prosper as a
result of the vision and guidance of its City Council. Continuing to deliver the finest services with slowing revenue growth and higher service costs will be the City’s challenge in
the years to come, and I believe this Financial Plan positions us to do that well. As always, it is our privilege and honor to serve those who work, live and recreate in our community,
while preserving and protecting our future fiscal health. Sincerely, Phil Cotton City Manager
This page is intentionally left blank.
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ABOUT THE CITY OF ENCINITAS The City of Encinitas has a population of approximately 64,000 and is located along six miles of Pacific coastline in the northern
half of San Diego County. Approximately 21 square miles, Encinitas is characterized by coastal beaches, cliffs, flat topped coastal areas, steep mesa bluffs and rolling hills. The City
is predominately a residential community with nearly 75% of its total acreage devoted to residential use. Residents and visitors alike take advantage of a wide range of activities and
amenities offered by the City. The downtown area along Coast Highway 101 is an over 100 year-old shopping district featuring historic architecture, quaint shops, sidewalk cafes and restaurants,
and lined by street lights adorned with flower baskets and artistic banners. The beaches in Encinitas are undeniably some of the most beautiful in the world. One can find avid surfers
year round on the stretches of beach that lie between Cardiff-by-the-Sea and Leucadia. The The City is bordered by the San Elijo Lagoon Reserve to the south and the Batiquitos Lagoon
along the north, where nature lovers can walk along trails and view an abundance of wildlife and vegetation. Golf enthusiasts enjoy the Encinitas Ranch Golf Course, a championship 18-hole
course with panoramic ocean views. The City’s trademark is its flower growing industry. Known as the “Poinsettia Capital of the World,” Encinitas has developed around its floral heritage
culture. Quail Botanical Gardens, the only botanical garden in San Diego County, has one of the world’s most diverse plant collections demonstrated amongst more than 20 unique gardens
(including the Hamilton’s Children Garden), a 60-foot waterfall in a tropical rain forest and North America’s largest display of bamboo. Encinitas was incorporated as a general law city
on October 1, 1986. The incorporation merged the five existing communities of New and Old Encinitas, Cardiff-by-the-Sea, Leucadia and Olivenhain. During incorporation, the San Dieguito
Water District (SDWD) became a subsidiary of the City. SDWD provides potable and recycled water to portions of the City. Management and certain administrative services are provided to
the District under the direction of the City Manager; the City Council also serves as the Board of Directors. The City and SDWD are members of several joint power agencies. These agencies
serve a multitude of purposes including managing water treatment facilities, issuing bonded debt and managing an emergency dispatch system. The City of Encinitas operates under the Council-Manager
form of government with members of the City Council appointing the positions of City Manager and City Attorney. All other staff positions are appointed by the City Manager or his designee.
Presently, the City has 241.65 authorized positions that provide most municipal services. Many municipal services are provided contractually. Some of these contracted services include
law enforcement; building permits and inspection; park, beach and trail maintenance; sewer treatment; and traffic signal and street light maintenance. The City encourages public participation
through various citizen commissions. The City’s commissions include the Planning Commission, Senior Citizen Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Youth Commission, Commission
for the Arts, Traffic Commission and newly created Environmental Commission. The purpose of each commission is to provide guidance and resolve issues affecting its functional area. The
City Council appoints the Commissioners and exercises oversight responsibility over each body. 1 -1
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW BUDGET PHILOSOPHY The City of Encinitas initially began developing multi-year financial plans (forecasts) and capital improvement programs in Fiscal Year 1994-95.
The purpose was to improve financial management including long-range and strategic planning, linking operating and capital activities. The “Operating Budget” is the spending plan to
provide core services to the citizens. It funds the day-to-day operation of the City and includes such expenditures as law enforcement, fire protection, park operations and maintenance,
recreational activities, planning, and street and landscape maintenance. The Operating Budget includes primarily routine, recurring expenses (e.g., salaries & benefits, material & supplies,
ongoing contractual services). The City adopts a two-year operating budget, and forecasts operating expenditures out six-years, but only appropriates funds for the first year. The “Capital
Improvement Program,” on the other hand, is a funding plan for large, non-recurring projects, generally to construct infrastructure or other assets. Examples include construction of
street improvements, civic buildings, parks, and drainage systems. The City Council forecasts capital expenditures out six-years, but only appropriates funding for the first year. The
“Financial Plan” ties together all of the expenditures in the Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program in each of the City’s (and Water District’s) 57 funds to provide a comprehensive
six-year forecast of the City’s financial position. Collectively, these documents are referred to as the City’s “Budget.” The City is on a two-year budget cycle and adopts a two-year
operating budget and
six-year capital improvement program. FY2009-10 is the first year of a two-year budget cycle (and the first year of the six-year capital plan). The FY2009-10 through FY2014-15 Financial
Plan (including the Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program) was adopted on May 20, 2009 after a public workshop was held on April 29, 2009. Whereas operating budgets tend to
remain relatively stable over time, capital budgets can fluctuate dramatically from year to year. As a result, the Capital Improvement Plan tends to be a more dynamic component of the
document and generally requires more revisions from year-to-year than the Operating Budget. The Capital Improvement Program is therefore published every year. The following pages explain
the purpose of developing a six-year forecast, the process to develop the FY2010 and 2011 Operating Budget and FY2010-2015 Financial Plan and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and the
assumptions and policy guidelines used in developing those plans. Figure 1, the North Coast Highway 101 Streetscape project was ranked as a Tier One Priority Capital Project at the Council’s
Strategic Goals Session in January 2009. See Page 8-3 for details of project. 1 -2
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW PURPOSE OF THE SIX-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Six-Year Financial Plan and CIP is the blueprint for the City’s current and future
fiscal decisions. It is a document that links the community’s financial resources, master plans, General Plan and Council goals and policies to needed services, programs and physical
improvements. As the community’s goals will periodically change to reflect current issues, so will the direction of the Financial Plan and CIP. The Six-Year Financial Plan and CIP benefit
the City by: • Helping to maintain a balance between debt service and current expenditures. Preprogramming operating and capital expenditures provides an early indication of the City’s
need to obtain outside financing and helps to determine the City’s capacity to incur additional debt. • Maximizing Regional, State and Federal Aid. Many State and Federal programs require
early identification of community needs and incorporation of these needs into regional plans before project funding can be obtained. A financial plan allows the community to program
its needs within sufficient time to be included in regional plans. Furthermore, the financial plan allows the community to coordinate future needs with the various Regional, State and
Federal Program criteria. • Establishing the level of capital expenditures the community can afford. Multiple-year financial planning sets the basis from which City Council can make
capital project financing decisions. Preprogramming expenditures and revenues allows the community to prioritize capital expenditures and new programs, without creating adverse impacts
to baseline community services. • Providing greater opportunity to fund larger projects. The financial plan provides a mechanism for funding larger and more expensive capital improvement
projects, thus avoiding a “piece meal” approach to improving the community’s infrastructure. When there is ample planning time, the most effective means of financing each project can
be selected. The financial plan helps the community avoid commitments and debts that may limit more important projects at a later date. • Providing an estimate of future operating and
maintenance costs. Preplanning enables the City to consider the revenues that will be necessary to operate and maintain the new facilities prior to development. • Keeping the community
informed of current and future projects. The financial plan keeps the public informed about the short-range and long-range fiscal and capital development plans for the community. It
assists citizens in understanding the constraints and limitations of capital projects and community service financing. • Focusing attention on community goals, needs, and capabilities.
The financial plan process ensures that City objectives, anticipated growth, and financial capabilities are incorporated into the planning of capital projects and services. The financial
plan provides a mechanism to prioritize new programs and capital projects based upon identifiable needs and available resources. 1 -3
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW • Improving intergovernmental and regional cooperation. The financial plan encourages cooperation among jurisdictions in planning for infrastructure that affects
more than one community such as roads, utility lines, or wastewater treatment facilities. It assists the regional planning agencies by providing an updated account of the City’s future
needs and proposed improvements. • Improving coordination between the City and Districts. A financial plan enables City and District staff to coordinate their projects with one another.
This results in more efficient administration of capital projects and reduced conflicting or overlapping projects. FINANCIAL PLANNING PROCESS The financial planning process can vary
from year to year, depending on economic conditions, activities at the State and Federal level, management leadership style, political factors, and scheduling priorities. Since the City
adopts a two-year budget (and produces a six-year financial plan), the first year process, differs from the off-year, referred to as the “Second Year Revise”. Regardless of the process,
the City adheres to certain budgeting and financial planning principles. Zero-Based Budgeting Under the leadership of the current City Manager, the City utilizes the Zero-Based Budgeting
(ZBB) methodology and develops quarterly spending plans. With ZBB, historical information is taken into consideration for assessing trends, but does not provide justification for future
expenditures. ZBB is a more time-consuming process compared to incremental budgeting, but the City experiences many advantages with this alternate process. The ZBB approach shifts budget
attention away from adding to the current-year program and focuses consideration on increases to the minimum level of operational support. ZBB is successful in educating the City Council
and upper-level management on the nature and details of programs and/or services. The ZBB approach also encourages redirection of resources within the budget into more productive programs
and activities. Quarterly Spending Plans The City Manager also requires each Department to develop and submit with their budget proposals quarterly spending plans. The quarterly spending
plans indicate when Departments expect to implement services and programs, and thereby expend resources. Following each quarter, the City Manager and Finance staff meet with Departments
to evaluate their quarterly spending plans and determine whether Departments were able to achieve their objectives according to the prescribed schedule. This process allows for candid
and frequent discussion on use of resources and allows for the timely redirection of resources when necessary. Departmental Organizational Analysis This year, in addition to the requirements
of developing a Zero-Based Budget and Quarterly Spending Plan, Department Heads were instructed to develop a comprehensive organizational assessment of their Department. This review
included an evaluation of current staffing levels and core duties of the Department, an outline of key performance indicators, an assessment of the economy’s impact on the Department
and recommendations for organizational restructuring and process improvements. These analyses were instrumental in structuring the proposed budget that was presented to Council. 1 -4
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1 -5 Process for FY2010-FY2015 Financial Plan, Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program In October 2008, staff presented to Council the actual audited
ending fund balances of the prior year, and thus the actual revised beginning fund balances of the current year (FY2008-09). The report discussed variations between budgeted and actual
figures. In November, staff presented the first quarterly update on the current year budget, as well as an economic update. In December, the City Manager and Department Heads met to
prioritize all existing and proposed capital projects against a set of criteria. First, projects were divided among four categories: Core Infrastructure Projects; Projects Substantially
Underway or With Restricted Funding; Projects Beyond Six Years; and All Other Projects. The first three categories were exempted from the prioritization process. Core Infrastructure
Projects were automatically considered highest funding priority. They include the following projects: Annual Street Overlay Program Storm Drain Repairs Traffic Signal Upgrades Information
Technology Systems Replacement Capital Project Prioritization Criteria A. Required by Legal Mandate (within a five-year period) Is the project needed to meet legal, state or federal
mandate or moral obligations? B. Affects Public Health or Safety Does the project eliminate or reduce unsafe or unhealthful conditions? C. Is Mandated by the Council Is this on the Council’s
adopted goals list or has Council already directed staff to proceed with this project? D. Maintains or Creates Necessary Infrastructure Does the project maintain existing infrastructure
or is this a critically important component of the infrastructure? Does deferring maintenance significantly increase costs or risk in the future? E. Dedicated Fees or Outside Funding
with Time Sensitivity Will this project be funded by moneys that impose time restrictions (grants)? What is the consequence of failing to meet deadlines? F. Contributes to Strategic
Planning Goals Is the project consistent with both long and short term planning goals or identified in the General Plan or an adopted Master Plan? Is this project consistent with regional
priorities/programs (i.e., SANDAG transportation, housing & goals)? G. Improves Efficiency, Is Cost Effective, or Revenue Enhancing Will the project increase the efficiency of service
delivery? Are the expected benefits greater than the project’s cost? Is the project realistically affordable? Does the project leverage funds from outside sources? H. Public Support
or Recognition Does the project have significant public recognition and support? Will the project increase citizen perception of good government? I. Replaces/Upgrades Facilities to Approved
or Acceptable Standards J. Related to Completion of Another Project/Projects Is the project essential to the success of other proposed projects? K. Affects Quality of Life (Aesthetics/Social
Effects) Does the Figure 2, Certain projects, such as the annual street overlay are considered “Core Infrastructure Projects” and receive priority funding each year. project have positive
aesthetic and social effects?
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Projects that were substantially underway or had restricted funding were also exempted from the process because their funding is not available to be redirected
to other projects. Projects beyond six years fall outside of the timeframe of the sixyear program and therefore were not competing for funding. All other remaining projects were subject
to the rigorous prioritization process, which included evaluation of each project against a set of criteria. Projects were then ranked and divided into “Priority Tiers.” These Priority
Tiers were then presented to the Council at the Strategic Goal Setting Session. On January 20, 2009, the City Council held the first of two public Strategic Goal Setting Sessions. At
that meeting staff presented a status report on Council’s existing goals and an update to the economic outlook presented in November, followed by a report of the City’s fiscal strengths
and challenges and the proposed “Priority Tiers” for capital projects. Council received public input and budget requests from the community members/groups and discussed their goals/objectives
for the upcoming years. Council held a second Strategic Goal Setting Session on January 27, 2009. At that meeting, Council adopted their two-year goals list and endorsed the list of
prioritized capital projects. The list of the most recent City Council Goals & Work Tasks and Tier One Capital Projects is included in Chapter 13, Appendices A & B. The information provided
at the Strategic Goals Setting Session set the guidelines for the development of the operating and capital programs within the six-year financial plan. Staff then began developing revenue
and expenditure financial assumptions using the most current economic data available. This analysis became the basis for determining the City’s fiscal capability for funding services,
programs and capital projects. Reflecting the severe downturn in the economy and consumer confidence, staff lowered revenue projections for property taxes, sales taxes, fees for charges,
investment earnings and many development impact fees. These assumptions are discussed in more detail in the “Financial Plan Assumptions” section of this chapter. On February 11, 2009,
staff presented a comprehensive status report of the capital improvement program to Council. Staff reported that there were 103 current projects in various stages of progress. Staff
also presented a mid-year update on the current fiscal year budget (FY2008-09). Subsequently, each Department developed a two-year operating budget (i.e., expenditure plan), quarterly
spending plan and organizational analysis. Department staff then met with the City Manager and Finance staff to review their proposed budgets and develop the draft proposal that would
go to the City Council. As part of the budgeting process, staff also conducted an in-depth analysis of user-fees (i.e., development processing fees) and internal cost allocation. The
results of this study were presented to Council in conjunction with the budget. The City Manager’s proposed Financial Plan/CIP and Operating Budget were introduced to the public and
the City Council on April 29, 2009, where the Council received public input and deliberated the proposed budget. Based on Council direction, a revised budget was brought back to the
Council and adopted on May 20, 2009. Now adopted, staff will present quarterly updates to the Council on the fiscal status of the City and the budget beginning in October. 1 -6
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW A detailed discussion of the approved budget can be found in the companion document entitled, “FY2009-10 & 2010-11 Operating Budget.” Timeline for Developing
Financial Plan/CIP Date Actions January 20, 2009 Council’s First Strategic Goal Setting Session and Economic Update January 27, 2009 Council’s Second Strategic Goal Setting Session and
Adoption of Goals List February 11, 2009 Comprehensive CIP Status Report and Mid-Year Operating Budget Report (FY2008-09) January 2009-March 2009 Assumptions and Departmental Expenditure
Plans developed using Zero-Based Budgeting April 29, 2009 Introduction of Financial Plan, Operating Budget and CIP May 20, 2009 Adoption of Financial Plan, Operating Budget and CIP October
2009 (Proposed) FY2009-10 Quarterly Report to City Council and Report on Financial Results for FY2008-09 and Actual Beginning Fund Balances for FY2009-10. 1 -7
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW FINANCIAL PLAN ASSUMPTIONS Significant Economic Impacts The nation is in the midst of the worst economy since the Great Depression. According to the Index of
Leading Economic Indicators for San Diego County, our regional economy has been in a state of decline for the past 36 months, with an accelerated decline beginning in September 2008.
The economic problems are broad based, including a banking crisis, massive job losses, and a depressed housing market. The nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has declined three quarters
in a row and is expected to continue to decline through at least the 3rd quarter of 2009. The U.S. unemployment rate is 8.9%, the California rate is 11.0% (the highest since the Great
Depression) and the San Diego County rate is 9.3%. Unemployment is expected to continue to worsen until early-mid 2010 when a slow rebound is expected. Consumer confidence is at an all-time
low and in San Diego County has fallen more than 67% in the last two years. Consumers continue to have a bleak outlook for the short-term, but their attitudes about the future are slightly
more optimistic than they are about the present. This is important, because consumer spending is typically two-thirds of economic activity. Development has come to a virtual standstill
with 2008 being the lowest year on record for building permits and 2009 likely to beat that record. In San Diego County, February 2009 had the lowest recorded number of building permits
issued in a single month and the number of residential units authorized in January and February combined was down 78% compared to the first two months of 2008. Development activity for
the City of Encinitas has slowed considerably, but not as severely as the region or State. During the first three quarters of the current fiscal year (FY2008-09), the Planning Department
had received a total of 100 applications, down from 114 applications received during the same time in the prior year. The number of discretionary applications (those requiring Planning
Commission or City Council review) increased slightly with 27 applications year-todate compared to 25 in the prior year. Building plan checks and inspections have also seen a drop. The
number of building permits has decreased from 1,993 in the first three quarters of FY2008 to 1,767 for the same period in FY2009 (an 11.3% decrease). The number of building inspections
has dropped 28% and the number of new dwelling units has decreased from 81 in the first three quarters of FY2008 to 69 units in the same period FY2009 (a 15% decrease). Housing prices
continue to decline. At the State level, the median price of a home fell to $223,000 (as of April 2009), down 38% from a year earlier. The sharp decline in the median is mainly the result
of two factors: home price depreciation, and a shift toward a higher portion of the State’s home sales occurring 1 -8
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW in relatively affordable, foreclosure-heavy inland markets. For more than a year, sales have been extremely low in many higherend markets, especially along
the coast, pulling down the median. In Encinitas, the median price of a single family home in 2008 was $730,000, down 11.8% from the prior year and median home prices are continuing
to decline in 2009. In response to the fiscal crisis, the Federal Government has taken steps to ease the economic pain, including a nearly $1 trillion stimulus package, an expansionary
monetary policy, and a new program to help the banks. Given the current state of the economy, the financial markets are extremely volatile. Many economists agree that while we may approach
the bottom of this recession within the next year, it will take several years to recover. Adding to the uncertainty of the future is the State’s apparent inability or refusal to deal
with its fiscal problems. In an effort to reform the State’s budgeting process and seal the February budget deal, Governor Schwarzenegger placed six measures on a special ballot agenda
in May. All, but one (denying pay increases to state elected official when the state is running a deficit) were defeated by huge margins, signaling voters’ frustration with the dysfunction
in Sacramento. The State is now projecting a $24 billion deficit. On May 5, the Governor’s office informed local government representatives of a proposal they were considering to borrow
local property tax revenues if the measures failed. This proposal would suspend Proposition 1A, which protects local government revenues, and allow the State to borrow up to 8% of local
government property tax revenues. The League of California Cities has advised cities not to budget for this proposal; however, the uncertainty of future State actions increases our risk
and threatens our financial plan. The City Council has a plan in place should the State implement their proposal to take local funds. The City’s reserve policy states, “A Contingency
Reserve will be budgeted each year… to twenty percent of operating expenditures…to provide for temporary financing of unanticipated extraordinary needs of an emergency nature and will
be drawn down as the funding source of last resort. Examples of events that could trigger the use of reserves include unexpected liability created by…State legislative action (e.g.,
takeaways)…” Taking into account all of this economic information, the financial plans assumed a prolonged depressed economy through the first two years, followed by a slow, but gradual
recovery over the following four years. Revenue Assumptions The projections contained in this Six-Year Financial Plan are based on economic data known today. In preparing the projections,
staff relied on information from prominent economists, leading academic groups and key indicators. Staff also consulted with or used information provided by the County Assessor, San
Diego Association of Governments, the State Legislative Analyst’s Office, the California Department of Finance, and Consultants such as The HdL Companies. Each revenue category has been
analyzed independently and projected according to the unique characteristics of that funding source. • Baseline Property Tax Revenue – Property Tax is the City’s largest revenue source
and represents nearly half of all General Fund revenues. Since the City merged with the Fire District in 1996, property tax revenue has grown every year at • varying rates. The lowest
rate of growth was 3.66% in 1997 and the highest was 10.8% in 2005. Although the City experienced several years of double digit growth in recent years, the rate of growth has been decelerating.
Last year’s assessed valuation (the basis for the property tax revenue) increased 5.3%. 1 -9
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Year Assessed Value Increase FY2004/05 $8,298,170,687 10.8% FY2005/06 $9,151,396,361 10.3% FY2006/07 $10,018,456,869 9.5% FY2007/08 $10,687,153,501 6.7% FY2008/09
$11,257,078,689 5.3% Under the current economy, the City has seen a slowdown of sales, an increase in defaults and foreclosures and high volume of requests for reassessment of property
values. Conversely, the market value of most homes in Encinitas is still above the assessed value and adds value to the tax rolls when sold. In addition, homes assessed below market
value, but not sold, will increase in assessed value by 2% per Proposition 13 and taxed accordingly. In determining the assumption for property tax next year, staff looked at comparative
trends in sales, foreclosures, and assessment appeals. Translating those factors into dollars, staff calculated the base real property assessed value, added the automatic CPI increase
mandated by Prop 13, factored in exposure related to foreclosures and assessment appeals, added added in value from potential new construction and sales where properties are sold and
reassessed at a higher value and calculated the total based on an anticipated delinquency rate. We have assumed that market levels will remain depressed for the next two years, but then
begin a very slow and gradual recovery over the following four years. This year, current secured property tax is estimated to increase by 2%. The current secured property tax revenues
for the remaining years have been adjusted as follows: FY10-11, 2%↑; FY11-12, 3%↑; FY12-13, 3.5%↑; FY13-14, 4%↑; and FY14-15, 4%↑. Total property taxes (including supplemental, delinquent
and unsecured) are projected to increase by 1% over last year in FY09-10 and then as follows: FY10-11, 2%↑; FY11-12, 3%↑; FY12-13, 3.4%↑; FY13-14, 4%↑ and FY14-15, 4%↑. • Baseline Sales
Tax, the second largest revenue source, represents approximately 19% of the General Fund revenues. Consumer confidence is at historic lows and several businesses in Encinitas have closed.
However, consumer confidence shows signs of future optimism and consumer spending is expected to resume as job losses decrease and capital markets ease up. Although annual revenue increases
since 2000 has averaged 8.6%, this year we saw significant declines in sales tax. After four quarters of revenue decline in 2008, staff is predicting an additional 8% reduction in sales
tax next year and then as follows: FY10-11, 0%; FY11-12, 2%↑, FY12-13, 2%↑, FY13-14, 2%↑ and FY14-15, 2%↑. • The State of California collects and distributes the Motor Vehicle License
Fees (VLF) based on a per capita formula. The State Controller’s office also provides the forecasting and analysis of this revenue including the certification of the 1 -10
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW population figures. The VLF is a tax on the ownership of a registered vehicle. The tax rate for local agency revenues is 0.65 percent of the value of a vehicle
paid by owners to the Department of Motor Vehicles and is constitutionally dedicated to cities and counties. VLF is down significantly because the fees go first to pay the administrative
costs associated with Department of Motor Vehicles and other agencies. As a result this revenue has been reduced from a historical rate of $350,000/year to $180,000/year. In addition
to revenues from the 0.65 percent VLF rate paid by vehicle owners, cities and counties receive additional property tax equal to the difference between revenues from the VLF at the 2
percent rate and the VLF at the 0.65 percent rate. Property tax received in lieu of VLF is projected using the same assumptions as property tax. • Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is a
tax imposed on persons staying 30 days or less in a hotel, inn or other lodging facility. This year, voters approved a measure to extend TOT to short term vacation rentals. The City’s
TOT has decreased in the current economic climate as tourism has diminished. Revenues have been decreased by about 1% for next year (FY2009-10) and then flat-lined in the following year
(FY2010-11). TOT is projected to grow 2.0% in each of the following years of the Financial Plan. Staff has also factored in new revenue from TOT collected on Short-Term Vacation Rentals.
Since there is no historical data on this revenue source, staff has conservatively projected $80,000/year in the first two years and increasing by 2% in the following four years. • Franchise
Fees – The City receives franchise fees or “rental” or “toll” for the use of city streets and rights-of-way from telephone, cablevision and solid waste companies. Revenues have remained
stable in this category due to a new franchise agreement with AT&T. Revenues are projected to decrease by 3% next year, but then recover increasing by 2.4% in FY2010-11 and by 2% over
the remaining four years of the plan. Two-percent of the gross receipts earned by Time Warner Cable and AT&T are set aside in the Governmental Educational Access Fund (Fund 228) to support
public, educational or governmental access facilities. The franchise money is used to obtain capital equipment, support operating expenses to televise City Council meetings for cable
cast on cable systems and Webcast City Council and Planning Commission meetings. These revenues are expected to remain flat over the next two years and then increase by 2% each year
over the remaining four years. • The Solid Waste/Household Hazardous Waste Fund (Fund 229) was created in February 2000, to track revenues and expenditures related to solid waste, recycling,
the household hazardous waste programs and the grants related to these programs. Revenues in this fund are predicted to remain stable. • Investment Earnings – The key objectives of the
City’s Investment Program are protecting principal, while maintaining adequate liquidity and earning earning a market rate of return over time. The City Council adopts a comprehensive
investment policy annually. Cash balances of all City funds are invested in accordance with Sections 53600 through 53635 of the California Government Code, except as otherwise provided
by specific action of the City Council. During Fiscal Year 2008-09, the City’s cash resources were primarily invested in the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), managed pool
and money market funds, and 1 -11
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW federal agency securities. Investment earnings are budgeted at a 1.0% earning rate for next year. Forecasts of interest rates beyond next fiscal year are impractical
given the uncertainty and volatility of the financial markets and will be updated on an ongoing basis. • The State of California collects and distributes the Gas Tax (Fund 201) revenue
based on a per capita formula. The State Controller’s office also provides the forecasting
and analysis of this revenue including the certification of the population figures. The Gas Tax is an 18-cent per gallon tax on fuel used to propel a motor vehicle or aircraft. Use of
Gas Tax is restricted to research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance and operation of public streets and highways or public mass transit guide ways. Gas sales have dropped
dramatically in the past year as consumers adjusted to dramatically rising gas prices. Revenue has been calculated at a 6% decrease for next fiscal year, flat-lined in FY10-11, a 1.5%
1.5% increase in FY11-12 and FY12-13 and then a 2% increase FY13-14 and FY14-15. • Charges for Services are revenues off-set by corresponding expenditures. Categories for Charges for
Services include planning, building, engineering and fire prevention fees for the processing and inspection of private development applications. As part of this year’s budget process,
staff conducted an in-depth analysis of costs related to private development activity and proposed revised fee schedules accordingly. For more information, please refer to the City of
Encinitas Cost Recovery Study Findings, dated April 29, 2009 and the staff reports presented to Council on April 29, 2009 and May 20, 2009. Total charges for services at the new rates
is $1,982,885, down 1% from the prior year. However the building fee revenue for next year is down 56% from FY2007-08 and down 7% from FY2008-09. Total Charges for Services are anticipated
to remain flat in FY2010-11 and then rebound as developers exercise their development rights before they expire. • Development Impact Fees: Development impact fees are collected from
builders and developers to pay for improvements and facilities required to serve new development or otherwise reduce the impacts of new development on a community. Development impact
fees cover one-time capital improvements and community amenities. In developing these revenue estimates, staff assumed that residential development would occur as follows: 25 units in
FY09/10, 25 units in FY10/11, 70 units in FY11/12, 85 units in FY12/13, 100 units in FY13/14 and 120 units in FY14/15. Revenue resulting from commercial ventures has been estimated using
known information from current commercial development applications. • SANDAG issues the Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) revenue forecasts for Local Street and Road Projects. The
TransNet funds are derived from the San Diego County voter approved one-half cent transportation sales tax Projections for the six-year plan are as follows (in millions), updated May
2009: FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 $1.434 $1.483 $1.534 $1.615 $1.687 $1.754 The Financial Plan and summary of the proposed projects that will be financed either partially or entirely
with TransNet funds are included in this document. The voters approved a modified redistribution of the funds whereby larger regional projects will receive a larger share of the allocations.
The allocations do not 1 -12
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW include investment earnings. Note: An updated schedule of TransNet revenue estimates was received after the budget was adopted by the Council on May 20. These
revised estimates will be presented to Council at the first quarterly update. The impact is not significant. • San Dieguito Water District Water – In 2008, the Board approved a Water
Rate Study for calendar years 2008, 2009, and 2010 that recommended an overall 5.5% increase in water rates and meter services charges for each of the three years. Two of the three increases
have been implemented. The final increase is set to become effective on January 1, 2010. The Study assumed that the cost of imported water would increase between 7 to 10% each year.
These numbers were in line with projections made by the San Diego County Water Authority (“CWA”). Last year, imported water costs increased 17%. Since the District received more local
water than anticipated, the increase in imported water costs did not severely impact the overall budget. Due mainly to lower water sales and a loss of reliable water supplies, the CWA
is anticipating an increase in imported water costs of approximately 30% next fiscal year. This increase, coupled with an increase in the Badger Filtration Plant’s capital costs, will
require an adjustment to revenues considerably higher than the 5.5% increase adopted. Therefore, the District plans to update the Water Rate Study to account for these increases. Total
revenue included in the financial plan over the six-year period (in millions): FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 $13.8 $17.0 $17.6 $18.7 $19.8 $21.2 • Cardiff and Encinitas Sanitary Divisions
– Operating revenues are derived principally from sanitary sewer service charges, which are billed to customers annually via the property tax roll. Future charges are projected to increase
modestly each year as part of a ten-year rate package adopted in 2004. Customers pay a small fixed charge and the balance based on a five-year rolling average of water consumed that
enters the sanitary sewer system. The Division also earns interest on surplus balances and collects connection or capacity fees for funding of future infrastructure needs related to
additional system capacity. FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Cardiff Sanitary Sewer Services Charges (in millions) $4.8 $4.5 $4.6 $5.6 $5.9 $6.2 Cardiff Sanitary Sewer Connection Fees (remain
flat) $85,425 $51,255 $51,255 $51,255 $51,255 $51,255 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Encinitas Sanitary Sewer Services Charges (in millions) $2.8 $2.7 $2.8 $2.9 $2.9 $3.0 Encinitas Sanitary
Sewer Connection Fees $80,400 $339,663 $80,000 $75,000 $60,000 $60,000 1 -13
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Expenditure Assumptions As with the revenues, the expenditure projections contained in this Six-Year Financial Plan are based on the assumption of a weak economic
outlook. Overall, next year’s budget represents a 3% decrease over the current year’s original budget. Management was directed to reduce costs commensurate with reductions in revenues
– particularly related to private development activity. Staff was prohibited from budgeting for out-of-state travel or furnishings. Expenditure estimates were prepared after consulting
with or reviewing information provided by the County of San Diego (Sheriff’s Department) for law enforcement, California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) for retirement and
health benefit costs and other contracting vendors who provide contract services to the City. Personnel Although the City contracts for many services, including law enforcement, personnel
costs represent approximately 50% of the City’s General Fund expenditures. The number of employees is measured in full-time equivalent (F.T.E.) units. One F.T.E. works full time, 2,080
hours per year; a half-time employee working 1,040 hours per year counts as 0.5 F.T.E. There are 241.65 F.T.E’s in the newly adopted budget, including the addition of a full-time Marine
Safety Sergeant. In addition to the routine evaluation of human resource needs, this year Department Heads were required to conduct an in-depth organizational analysis, looking for cost-effective
ways to structure human resources. Directors were also instructed to review each vacancy with the City Manager prior to hiring a replacement to evaluate the parameters of the position,
redefine positions to better meet citywide goals, consolidate positions or contract the service. As a result, several positions were left vacant as follows: The budget also eliminates
temporary help for vacation coverage, and significantly reduces overtime. Salaries & Benefits The City negotiates labor contracts with three labor groups: Encinitas Firefighters’ Firefighters’
Association; Encinitas Firefighter Chiefs’ Association; and Service Employees’ International Union (SEIU). Changes to the terms and conditions of future employee agreements require approval
by the City Council prior to enactment. Salaries and benefits for safety employees (fire safety) reflect the terms of current bargaining agreements with the employees through December
31, 2009, when the Firefighters’ Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) expires. The Encinitas Professional Fire Chiefs’ Association’s MOU expires June 30, 2010. The proposed budget includes
provisions of the MOU through FY2010. The City’s MOU with employees in (SEIU) (non-safety personnel and marine safety) expires December 31, 2011. MOU provisions are included in both
FY2010 and FY2011 budgets. In prior years, proposed budgets and long-term financial plans were developed with no intention Estimated Savings Position/Department FY2010 FY2011 0.5 FTE
Intern, City Manager 9,100 0 1.0 Planner, Current Planning 87,500 90,600 0.5 Planner, Customer Service, Planning 54,800 57,000 0.75 Program Assistant, Current Planning 53,400 55,300
0.25 Program Assistant, Customer/Service Planning 17,800 18,500 0.5 Intern, Public Works 18,200 19,000 1.0 Management Analyst, Parks & Recreation 87,100 90,200 0.5 Intern, Geographic
Information Systems 18,200 19,000 0.5 Intern, Transferred position from Engineering to GIS 18,200 19,000 5.5 Total Vacancies, approximate savings 364,300 368,600 1 -14
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW to predict or establish parameters for future negotiations with employee bargaining groups; however, average annual pay increases of 3.25%, which is assumed
by CalPERS as a benchmark to estimate overall growth, was used to estimate personnel growth in long-term plans. This assumption is not used in the proposed six-year plan; no cost of
living increase is included in the budget beyond the terms of the current labor contracts. The City also contracts with California Public Employee Retirement System (CalPERS) to provide
retirement benefits to all (represented and unrepresented) employees. Employer contributions for safety employees, under a 3% at 55 Plan, are budgeted at an average of 18.23% of payroll.
The City also pays the employee’s required contribution of 9.0% of payroll. Employer contributions for non-safety members, under a 2.7% at 55 Plan, are budgeted at an average of 16.30%
of covered payroll. The employees pay an approximate 4.669% of the employee’s required contribution contribution of 8.0% of payroll. CalPERS has advised that lower than expected investment
return will likely have an impact on contracting agency employer rates. As of April 27, 2009, the CalPERS fund had lost more than 25% of its value since July 1, 2008. They estimate that
this decrease in the portfolio would likely increase employer contribution rates by up to 5%. The City has budgeted an additional 5% of payroll accordingly for both safety and miscellaneous
members. Due to actuarial methods, the projected CalPERS rate increase would not go into effect until FY2012. Healthcare benefits as stipulated in the current labor contracts are included
in the budget, and there are no provisions made for increases in subsequent years. Unemployment costs are expected to increase during the recessionary period and rates have been increased
from 0.4% to 0.5% of payroll. The Self Insurance Fund acts as the internal insurance company which provides the City of Encinitas with coverage for liability, workers’ compensation,
compensation, unemployment, property damage, vehicles, separation pay and other miscellaneous exposures. City Departments are charged premiums as a percentage of employee payroll as
a means for funding the workers’ compensation self-insured program. Expenditures are projected at $1,538,286 in FY2010 (an increase of $131,518 over FY2009 due to increased insurance
costs and anticipated unemployment insurance costs) and $1,553,808 in FY2010 which represents an increase of $15,522 over the prior year. The General Fund transfer to the Self Insurance
Fund is $400,000 in FY2010 and $300,000 in FY2011. Beginning, FY2010, the workers’ compensation premiums and unemployment insurance premiums have been adjusted as follows and are reflected
in all citywide expenditure plans and resulting in increased revenue to the Self Insurance Fund. Workers Unemployment for City and SDWD Employees FY2008-09 FY2010 & FY2011 Premiums as
a percentage of payroll 0.4% 0.5% Worker Compensation Rate for City Employees FY2008-09 FY2010 & FY2011 7706 Fire Safety 5.7500% 5.8000% 8810 Office Employee 1.000% 1.000% 9410 Non-Manual
Municipal Employee 1.550% 1.550% 9420 Manual Municipal Employee 4.2500% 4.3000% The San Dieguito Water District is insured with the Association of California Water Agencies Joint Powers
Insurance Authority (ACWA/JPIA) and is not part of the City’s Self-Insurance Fund. 1 -15
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Water District premiums (as a percentage of payroll) have been reduced during the next two-year period as follows: Worker Compensation Rates for SDWD Employees
FY2008-09 FY2010 & FY2011 7520 Manual Water Employee 9.6833% 4.5465% 8742 Meter Readers 1.6390% 1.0341% 8810 Office Employee 1.4322% 0.9003% 9410 Non-Manual Water Employee 1.4322% 0.9003%
Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) GASB Statement 45 requires public agencies to evaluate and report in its annual financial statements the unfunded liability of any post-employment
benefits (i.e. retiree healthcare). The City of Encinitas was required to comply with the Statement as of July 1, 2008. In preparation for the implementation of this Standard, the City
placed a set-aside in the City and District’s budgets and had an actuarial valuation prepared for the City and District’s Retiree Healthcare Plan by Bartel & Associates, an independent
actuary. On April 23, 2008, the City Council was presented with the results of the study and opted to set up a trust to advance fund this obligation. All costs of the annual required
contribution have been factored into the budget. Non-personnel (materials, supplies, contracts): Since the City contracts out for many core services, including law enforcement, a significant
portion of costs appear in this category. Departments developed their budgets focusing on Council’s three strategic priorities: public safety, infrastructure maintenance and providing
core services to residents and businesses. The proposed budgets include significant reductions to travel and training (no out of state travel is permitted), elimination of furnishing
purchases and elimination of temporary help during planned absences of permanent personnel. Reductions were also factored in for contribution to outside community organizations and agencies.
FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Materials and Supplies (19.4%) 0.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Contracts and Services-except Sheriff contract (13.3%) 3.9% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% Contracts and Services-Sheriff’s
contract* 2% 5% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% Internal Cost Allocation (9.4%) 2.4% 1% 1% 1% 1% Debt Service As a general rule of thumb, annual debt service that is supported by tax revenues should
represent no more than 10% of the general fund’s annual revenue. The City’s debt service, which includes the purchase of property for a 43-acre park and financing for City Hall and the
library, is approximately 6.2% of the City’s budget. The City’s credit rating was recently reevaluated by Standard & Poor’s and upgraded from AA to AA+. San Dieguito Water District The
County Water Authority provides approximately 70% of the water to the San Dieguito Water District. The last budget assumed that the cost of imported water would increase between 6 to
10% each year. These numbers were in line with projections made by the CWA. Last year, imported water costs increased 17%. Since the District received more local water than anticipated,
the increase in imported water costs did not severely impact the current year’s budget. Due mainly to lower water sales and a loss of reliable water supplies, the CWA is anticipating
an increase in imported water costs of approximately 30% next fiscal year. In addition, there are proposed increases to 1 -16
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW capital improvements to the Badger Filtration Plan. As a result, expenditures are expected to increase dramatically: FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Water Costs
– Purchases and Treatment (in millions) $14.7 $22.8 $9.6 $9.1 $9.0 $9.0 Operating Expenditures Percentage Changes $9.5 $14.3 $7.0 $7.0 $7.0 $7.0 Debt Service (in millions) $1.76 $1.75
$1.76 $1.75 $1.65 $1.66 Cardiff Sanitary and Encinitas Sanitary Divisions On January 14, 2004, the City Council approved a 10-year sewer service charge rate structure. The expenditures
are covered by sewer service charges and are structurally balanced. Revenues from service charges and capacity or connection fees also cover a planned capital improvement program. FY10
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Cardiff Division: Treatment costs at San Elijo Water Reclamation facility (in millions) $3.3 $7.7 $5.0 $5.0 $5.0 $5.0 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Encinitas
Division: Treatment costs at Encina Wastewater facility (in millions) $4.6 $5.3 $5.0 $5.0 $5.0 $5.0 DOCUMENT FORMAT The attached document is divided into three primary parts – Part I:
the Financial Plan; Part II: the Capital Improvement Program, and Part III: the Unfunded Capital Projects and Appendices (a detailed operating budget is published as a separate document).
I. The first part (Chapter 2) contains six-year summary financial information for all City and San Dieguito Water District (District) Funds. This information provides a six-year forecast
of the City and District’s revenues and expenditures and is used as the framework for developing the six-year capital program. Below is a brief description of the line items in the Six-Year
Financial Plan. Line 1 – The “Beginning Fund Balance” is the projected unallocated beginning fund balance for each fiscal year. Line 2 – “Baseline Revenues” are revenues historically
received in that fund. For example, in the General Fund, property taxes are a “baseline revenue.” Line 3 – “New Revenues” are revenues that have not been historically received and
are often created by new growth or development in the community. The “Discretionary” and “Non-Discretionary” subcategories indicate whether the money is restricted for a specific purpose.
An example of non-discretionary revenue is a grant received for a specific expenditure or project. This line has also been used to record anticipated “Reimbursements” in the Debt Service
Fund (Fund 321). 1 -17
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Line 5 – “Baseline Expenditures” are funds allocated for previously approved Council programs, municipal activities and personnel. Baseline expenditures
are also known as annual operating expenses or expenditures. Line 6 – “New Programs” are defined as first time program/services or an increase to an existing program/service that
exceeds $10,000. This category also includes new personnel. Line 8 – “CIPs/Work Projects” shows a summary total of proposed Capital Improvement Projects for that funding source. Projects
are itemized at bottom of spreadsheet. Line 10 – “Transfers In(Out)” shows transfers made from one fund to another. An example is a transfer from the General Fund to the City’s Self
Insurance Fund (internal insurance fund). Line 11 – “Current Year Net” is the year’s net revenues (baseline and new) less the total expenditures (baseline and new programs), the proposed
capital expenditures and any transfers. Line 13 – “Contingency Reserves” show any reserves reserves mandated by City Council policy. For example, the General Fund has a reserve of
twenty percent of its approved Operating Budget. Beginning in FY2008, the General Fund also has a “Budget Stabilization Reserve” which is targeted at two percent of the fund’s revenues.
Line 14 – “Future Project Reserves” shows the unappropriated fund balance beyond any minimum contingency reserve that is available for appropriation to projects or other Council-approved
expenditures. II. The second part of the document (Chapters 3 through 9) contains the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which includes detailed information on each capital project.
The projects are organized into the following categories: • Consultant Services & Studies, including Work Projects, Master Plan preparation, and special studies; • Drainage Projects,
including area and neighborhood improvements; • Wastewater Projects, including treatment plant improvements and sewer main replacements for the City’s two sanitary divisions; • Public
Facilities, including civic center upgrades; • Park and Beach Projects, including parkland acquisition, parkland improvements, recreational trail development, and recreation/public facilities
renovations; • Streets and Rail Corridor Projects, including roadway improvements and widening, traffic safety and calming, traffic signal upgrades, the annual street overlay, and sidewalk/bikeway
improvements; • Water System Projects, including pump station and distribution system improvements for the San Dieguito Water District. 1 -18
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW At the beginning of each category group is a summary page that presents a six-year overview of the proposed capital improvements projects and their funding
sources. Following the summary sheet are individual detail pages for each project, which include the following information: • Project Title, Project Number and Description -A narrative
description of the project and scope of work; • Justification -The need for the project and what accomplishments are anticipated; • General Plan Consistency – Those General Plan policies
and goals which support the project; • Anticipated Environmental Review – The related code that requires or exempts the project; • Costs -The proposed project expenditures for each fiscal
year; • Prior Years Appropriations -All funds previously appropriated by Council for the project (or for projects with an annual appropriation, only the prior year’s appropriation);
• Sources of Funds -The fund or funds from which money will be expended for that particular project. III. The final portion of the document (Chapters 10 through 13) includes the unfunded/underfunded
projects, the Comprehensive CIP list, the Capital Projects Summaries and the Appendices: • Unfunded/Underfunded Projects (Chapter 10) – A list of projects that have been recommended
but due to insufficient resources or lower prioritization remains unfunded or underfunded during the six-year period; • Comprehensive CIP Report (Chapter 11) -A list of all active capital
projects; • Capital Project Summaries (Chapter 12) -A summary of all Capital Projects by Total and Projects by Revenue source. This Chapter includes pie charts by category and revenue
source; • Summary of City Council Goals and Work Tasks (Appendix A) which includes the status of each Council goal; • Tier One Capital Improvement Projects (Appendix B) • Long Term Obligations
and Capital Leases (Appendix C) • City Council Reserve Policy – General Fund (Appendix D) • Resolution of Adoptions (Appendix E): of the Fiscal Year 2008-09 operating budget and Fiscal
Year 2007-08 through 2010-13 Financial Plan and Capital Improvement Program, revised May 2008 for Fiscal Year 2008-09; • Glossary (Appendix F): An alphabetical list of terms used in
the document; • Index (Appendix G): An alphabetical guide of the document. 1 -19
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW SUMMARY OF THE FINANCIAL PLAN (Chapter 2) The Financial Plan contains six-year financial forecasts (revenues and expenditures for each of the City’s and SDWD’s
57 funds). The assumptions and expenditure plan developed during the budget process provide the basis for the data in these forecasts. All 57 funds are summarized in the “Schedule A”
documents at the beginning of Chapter 2, followed by a detailed sheet for each fund. The General Fund is the largest and most discretionary fund and is the first fund presented in the
Financial Plan (Fund 101). The projected ending fund balance is $14.8 million by the end of the current fiscal year, $14.3 million in FY2010 and $12.7 million in 2011. Revenues are projected
to decrease by 3% to $50.3 million in FY2010 and then increase 1.4% to $51 million in FY2011. Operating expenditures have been reduced from the originally adopted FY2009 budget of $48
million to $46.6 million (a 3% decrease) in FY2010 and then $48.3 million in FY2011. The General Fund contribution to the capital program is $737,000 in FY2010 and $1.1 million in FY2011.
The debt service payment is $3.1 million in FY2010 (Debt ratio of 6.2%) and $3.1 million in FY2011 (6.0%). The General Fund also has a contingency reserve equal to 20% of operating expenditures
and a budget stabilization reserve equal to 5% of revenues. Many times, the “budget” refers to the General Fund, although programs, services and projects are supported by all the funds.
The General Fund is balanced in all six-years of the financial forecast and maintains all reserves at the target levels established in the Council’s Reserve Policy. This has been accomplished
by developing realistic budget assumptions, implementing strategic cuts, and restructuring the Capital Plan, while focusing on the Council’s highest priorities of ensuring public safety,
maintaining the City’s sizeable infrastructure system and providing core services to residents and business. Some of the key highlights of the proposed financial plan include: Balanced
budget for all six years of the financial plan Maintains all Council target reserves Maintains current level of service for law enforcement, traffic enforcement and fire protection
and prevention Adds one Marine Safety Sergeant Provides funding to maintain the City’s core infrastructure Provides for continuous operation of all parks and beaches with no
reductions in hours of service Provides for continuous operation of all City services with no reduction in hours of service Includes funding for all provisions of current labor
contracts Includes additional funding for potential employer rate increases associated with recent losses to the Public Employee Retirement System portfolio Maintains funding for
all required debt service payments Includes updated fees for development processing and inspection, business registration and room rental charges Provides funding for the full
annual required contribution to the Other Post Employment Benefits Trust Provides funding for Council’s highest priority projects, including the City’s General Plan Update and annual
capital contributions towards the Hall Property Park Development and the North Coast Hwy. 101 Streetscape 1 -20
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW The Financial Plan contains financial forecasts for the following funds: • General Fund: Accounts for all discretionary financial resources. A broad range of
municipal activities is provided through this fund including operating and capital projects. • Self Insurance Fund: Established to act as an internal insurance company for the City with
coverage for liability, property, vehicles, separation pay and other miscellaneous exposures. • Special Projects Fund: This fund was established to track the 2006 Proceeds of Bonds.
A bond issuance of $20,000,000 resulted in $18,268,000 in proceeds. The proceeds may be used only to fund the public works facility (completed in FY2008-09), fire station reconstruction
and the proposed Hall Property park. • Recreation Programs Fund: Used to collect revenue and pay for the City’s various recreation programs. • Civic Center Improvement Fund: This fund
was established to collect the rents from the various users, which then fund the debt service requirements and pay for major maintenance and improvements to common areas of the Civic
Center. • Gas Tax Funds: Derived from the State tax on gasoline sales. The funds are allocated to cities based on Sections 2105, 2106, 2107, and 2107.5 of the California Street and Highway
Code. Gas Tax funds are restricted for use in the construction, improvement and maintenance of public streets. Once a contributor to the annual street overlay program, the Fund now supports
a portion of the annual operating costs and is subsidized by the City’s General Fund • Federal and State Grants: Contributions of cash or other assets from governmental agencies and
are to be used or expended for a specified purpose, activity, or facility. • TransNet: Originally a twenty-year local transportation sales tax program approved by San Diego County voters
in 1988, this tax was extended for 40 years by voters in November 2004. The one-half percent sales tax increase can be used for establishing, operating, and maintaining transportation
programs programs or facilities. Funds are collected by the State and reallocated to the local governments by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). • Transportation Development
Act Grant Funds: Discretionary TransNet money that is distributed on a competitive grant basis by SANDAG. • Coastal Zone Management Fund: Established following an election in November
1998 to increase the City’s hotel tax from 8% to 10%. The additional 2% is used for beach sand replenishment and stabilization programs. Short term vacation rentals are subject to the
2% portion of the hotel tax. • Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) and Other Housing Funds (Affordable Housing, Housing Authority, H.O.M.E, Pacific Pines Fund): CDBG funds are
federal funds that are allocated to local governments on a formula basis and are required to be used within the broad functional area of community development. The City has utilized
the funds for safe walk to school projects as well as citywide sidewalk programs. The other funds are used to to support the City’s affordable housing program. 1 -21
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW • Governmental/Educational Access Fund: Established to account for the monies received from cable communication companies as part of franchise renewal agreements.
The funds are used to obtain capital equipment and support operating expense to televise city council meetings for cable cast. • The Recycling/Solid Waste/Household Hazardous Water Fund
was created in 2000 to track revenues and expenditures related to Solid Waste Disposal, Recycling Household Hazardous Waste Programs and all Grants associated with the program. • Park
Development Fees: Required of a developer/builder to defray the estimated costs of developing new or rehabilitating existing parkland and recreational facilities. • Flood Control Fees:
Required of a developer/builder to defray the actual or estimated costs of constructing drainage facilities to serve the new development. These funds are used for the construction of
drainage facilities. • Traffic Mitigation Fees: Required of a developer/builder to defray the actual or estimated costs of constructing planned infrastructure to serve new development.
These funds may be used only for the construction of roadways and roadwayrelated facilities, such as signals, stop signs, etc. • Park Acquisition Fees: Required of a developer/builder
to defray the costs of acquiring recreational facilities or parkland. • Open Space Impact Fees: Required from builders or developers of residential property for the purpose of defraying
the cost of acquiring community assets of open space land. • Recreation Trail Fees: Required from builders or developers of residential property for the purpose of defraying the cost
of acquiring land for or developing recreational trails. • Community Facilities Impact Fees: Required from builders or developers of residential property for the purpose of defraying
the cost of community facilities such as the Community library. • In Lieu Curb, Gutters and Sidewalks Fees: Collected on certain development projects where it is impractical for the
applicant to construct the required public improvements. • In Lieu Underground Utilities Fees: Collected on certain development projects where it is impractical for the applicant to
construct the required public improvements. • Regional Traffic Congestion Improvement Program Fees: A Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee as required by the San Diego Association Governments
Ordinance 04-01, which is intended to ensure that future development will contribute its share toward funding and mitigating new traffic impacts on the Regional Arterial System. Local
jurisdictions must comply with this requirement in order to receive their fair share of TransNet funding. • Asset Forfeiture, State Special Law Enforcement and Federal Special Law Enforcement:
Used to acquire additional non-personnel expense items to aid in law enforcement activities and supplement law enforcement services. 1 -22
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW • Fire Mitigation Fees: Required of a developer/builder to defray the estimated costs of acquiring and developing land for fire stations that serve new development
and growth areas. • Landscape and Lighting Funds: Used for the maintenance and improvement of street lights, traffic signals and landscaping within the street right-of-way. • Encinitas
Public Financing Authority – Debt Service Fund: Serves as the City’s debt service payment and administration fund for all government debt issues. • Wastewater Services Fund: Used to
account for operational costs related to Wastewater operations. Expenditures are allocated to the Cardiff Sanitary Division and Encinitas Sanitary Division. • Fleet Maintenance Fund:
Accounts for operational costs related to vehicle maintenance. • Vehicle Replacement Fund: Used to collect charges from various Departments for replacement of vehicle and equipment.
Cardiff Sanitary Division Funds include the following: • Operating Fund: Receives the majority of its revenue through the annual sewer service charges imposed on customers. The fund
is used for operation and maintenance of sewer mains, pump stations, the treatment plant, and/or administrative and facility overhead costs. • Replacement Fund: Revenues are derived
from the annual sewer service rates/fees that are assessed on the district customers. The Replacement Fund is used to reconstruct and upgrade existing facilities. • Expansion Funds:
Revenues come from fees collected from developers/builders and are used to defray the cost of constructing planned infrastructure to meet future demands. • Rate Stabilization Fund: Created
in FY2002-03, was established to stabilize sewer rates for the consumers. Encinitas Sanitary Division Funds include the following: • Operating Fund: Receives the majority of its revenue
through a portion of the annual sewer service charges. The fund is used to operate and maintain division facilities and to pay administration and facility overhead costs. • Replacement
Fund: A portion of the annual sewer service charges is the revenue source for the Replacement Fund. This fund is used to reconstruct and upgrade existing facilities. • Expansion Funds:
Contains fees collected from developers/builders and is used to pay the actual or estimated costs of constructing planned infrastructure to meet future demands. • Rate Stabilization
Fund: Established to stabilize sewer rates for the consumers. 1 -23
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW The San Dieguito Water District Funds are derived from the following sources: • Operating Fund: Revenues are primarily generated through water sales and are
used for the ongoing maintenance of the water distribution system, water purchases, water treatment and administration of the district. • Replacement Fund: Receives a portion of the
revenues from water sales and is used for reconstruction and upgrading of the existing distribution system. The fund also receives fees collected from developers/builders and is used
to defray the cost of constructing future infrastructure to accommodate new development. • Rate Stabilization Fund: Created in FY2002-03, this fund was established to stabilize water
rates for the consumers. 1 -24
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW SUMMARY OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (Chapters 3-9) The published Capital Plan contains only those projects for which funds are proposed in the next six
years. Projects that are already fully funded do not appear in the Capital Plan. Rather they are shown at the end of the document in the “Comprehensive CIP List” (Chapter 11). Consultant
Services and Studies (Work Projects) – This category includes ongoing funding for the Downtown Façade Improvement Incentive Program, a new Green Building Incentive Program, Various Sand
Replenishment and Retention Studies, IT System Improvements, a Comprehensive General Plan and Housing Element Update, and Various Fee and Rate Studies. Drainage Projects – This category
includes ongoing funding for the Storm Drain Repair Fund. Wastewater Projects – This category includes ongoing funding for capital contributions to the San Elijo Water Reclamation Facility,
the Batiquitos Pump Station, the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility and ongoing implementation of the Cardiff Sanitary Division and Encinitas Sanitary Division Master Plans. Facilities
Projects – This category includes ongoing funding for Civic Center Improvements. Parks and Beaches Projects – This category includes funding for the Hall Property Community Park, Habitat/Open
Space Acquisition, and Recreational Trails Development. Streets and Rail Corridor Projects – This category includes annual funding for pavement overlay, improvements to N. Coast Hwy.
101, Leucadia Boulevard, Santa Fe Drive, and La Costa Avenue. It also includes funding for traffic safety/calming projects, traffic signal modifications, and sidewalks. This category
also includes funding for the construction of a parking lot at the southwest corner of Vulcan Avenue and E Street. Water Projects – This category includes water distribution line upgrades,
water valve replacements, fire hydrant installation, meter replacements and implementation of the automated meter reading program. Figure 3, Development of a 44 acre park located in
Cardiff by the Sea is a Tier One Priority project. The proposed project will include multiuse fields, a dog park, skate park, swim center, teen center, trails and playgrounds. 1 -25
This entire document can be found on the City’s website www.cityofencinitas.org INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1 -26 BASIS OF ACCOUNTING Governmental fund financial statements are reported
using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenue is recognized as soon as it is both measurable and available. Revenue is
considered to be available if it is collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. Expenditures are generally recorded when
a liability is incurred. The proprietary fund financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenue is recorded
when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. BASIS OF BUDGETING For the most part, the basis of budgeting is consistent
with the basis of accounting discussed above. Any budgeted funds that are not expensed by the end end of the first year of the two-year budget can be “carried over” to the second year
by Council approval of a continuing appropriation request. All other unexpended appropriations lapse at the end of the year. Any variations between budgeted and actual revenues and expenditures
are reported at year end, following the City’s annual audit, to City Council. At mid-fiscal year, a status report of all capital projects is presented to City Council. RECOGNITION/AWARDS
The City of Encinitas and San Dieguito Water District received the Excellence in Capital Budgeting Award from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers for the FY2008-09.
The City and SDWD also received the Excellence in Operating Budgeting Award for the two year FY2007-08 and FY2008-09 Operating Budget. Copies of the certificates are included in this
document.
Chapter 2 Proposed Budget Summaries & Schedule A's The Green Building Incentive Program would encourage "green" construction techniques by providing funds to assist applicants with final
certification inspections. Projects that propose and achieve certification through the Build It Green GreenPoint Rated program for residential projects or the US Green Building Council's
LEED program for commercial projects would be provided up to $1,000.00 per application to assist with costs of the respective program's final certification inspection. Station 3, 801
Orpheus Avenue, Leucadia, opened on June 17, 2009. Fire Station Construction Capital Improvement Project. 2-1
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Adjusted Interfund Interfund Interfund Interfund Current Year Adj. Projected Page Fund Balance Revenue Proposed Transfers Transfers Transfers
Transfers Summary Fund Balance No. FUND NAME (FUND NO.) July 1, 2008 Projections Expenditures Operating Other Debt Service Capital (3-4+5+6+7+8) (2-9) GENERAL FUNDS 2-8 General (101)
16,833,998 51,774,830 46,440,874 (406,203) 101,505 (2,971,436) (4,105,866) (2,048,044) 14,785,954 2-12 Self-Insurance (113) 3,130,319 892,965 1,406,768 533,803 0 0 0 20,000 3,150,319
2-13 Special Projects Fund (119) 719,971 214,031 0 0 99,600 0 0 313,631 1,033,602 2-15 Civic Center Improvements (152) 261,557 1,059,269 0 0 0 (925,907) (150,000) (16,638) 244,919 n/a
Sales Tax Receivable (192) 828,239 0 0 0 (82,381) 0 0 (82,381) 745,858 2-14 Recreation Programs (146) 276,414 1,436,618 1,377,648 0 0 0 0 58,970 335,384 INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDS 2-16 Gas
Tax (201) 283,893 1,249,398 1,141,857 (160,000) 0 0 0 (52,459) 231,434 2-17 Federal Trans. Grants (202) 0 451,290 0 0 0 0 (451,290) 0 0 2-18 State Capital Grants (203) 0 5,552,779 0
0 0 0 (4,600,000) 952,779 952,779 2-19 Transnet-Prop A Sales Tax (204) (1,367,061) 2,515,101 0 0 0 0 (940,000) 1,575,101 208,040 2-20 Federal TDA Grants (205) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-21
Coastal Zone Management Fund (210) 1,627,362 244,359 275,591 32,400 0 0 (366,312) (365,144) 1,262,218 GRANT FUNDS 2-22 C.D.B. Grant (222) 0 504,139 409,217 0 0 0 (94,922) 0 0 2-23 Affordable
Housing (225) 65,806 1,807 0 0 0 0 0 1,807 67,613 2-24 Encinitas Housing Authority (226) 74,208 1,192,150 1,188,050 0 0 0 0 4,100 78,308 2-25 HOME Entitlement (227) 0 861,758 861,758
0 0 0 0 0 0 2-26 Govt/Educational Access (228) 281,340 135,556 64,127 0 0 0 0 71,429 352,769 2-27 Recycling/Solid Waste/HHW (229) 1,429,104 446,704 552,796 0 0 0 0 (106,092) 1,323,012
2-38 Asset Forfeiture (261) 99,878 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 (5,000) 94,878 2-38 Special Law Enforcement (262) 0 50,916 50,916 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-38 Federal Special Law Enforce (263) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUNDS 2-28 Park Improvement Fees (231) 145,518 80,150 0 0 0 0 0 80,150 225,668 2-31 Parkland Acquisition Fees (234) (72,900) 215,520 0 0 0 (250,000) (100,000)
(134,480) (207,380) 2-29 Flood Control Fees (232) (36,265) 82,296 0 0 0 0 (55,000) 27,296 (8,969) 2-30 Traffic Mitigation Fees (233) 1,883,532 437,354 0 0 0 0 (980,000) (542,646) 1,340,886
2-32 Open Space (235) 14,897 14,166 0 0 0 0 (25,000) (10,834) 4,063 2-33 Recreational Trails (236) 3,062 3,618 0 0 0 0 0 3,618 6,680 2-34 Community Facilities (237) 0 19,124 0 0 (19,124)
0 0 0 0 2-35 In Lieu Curb Gutter Sidewalks (238) 6,189 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,189 2-36 In Lieu Underground Utilities (239) 485,454 14,270 0 0 0 0 0 14,270 499,724 2-37 RTCIP (Regional Arterial
System) Fee (241) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-39 Fire Mitigation Fees (272) 0 99,600 0 0 (99,600) 0 0 0 0 LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING DISTRICTS 2-40 Village Park MID (290) 144,400 36,177 41,690 0
0 0 0 (5,513) 138,887 2-41 Villanitas Road MID (291) 204,944 26,207 16,209 0 0 0 0 9,998 214,942 2-42 Cerro Street MID (292) 180,610 47,214 27,500 0 0 0 0 19,714 200,324 2-43 Encinitas
Lighting/Citywide (295) 444,406 1,170,781 1,242,111 0 0 0 0 (71,330) 373,076 2-44 Wiro Park (296) 8,862 11,239 14,265 0 0 0 0 (3,026) 5,836 2-45 Encinitas Ranch District (297) 626,629
675,644 578,333 0 0 0 0 97,311 723,940 TOTAL CITY FUNDS 28,584,366 71,517,030 55,694,710 0 0 (4,147,343) (11,868,390) (193,413) 28,390,953 Approved Budget Summary (Schedule A) -Fiscal
Year 2008-2009 2-2
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Adjusted Interfund Interfund Interfund Interfund Current Year Adj. Projected Page Fund Balance Revenue Proposed Transfers Transfers Transfers
Transfers Summary Fund Balance No. FUND NAME (FUND NO.) July 1, 2008 Projections Expenditures Operating Other Debt Service Capital (3-4+5+6+7+8) (2-9) Approved Budget Summary (Schedule
A) -Fiscal Year 2008-2009 AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK 2-50 Pacific Pines Condominiums (561) 307,691 237,134 196,063 0 0 0 0 41,071 348,762 TOTAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING 307,691 237,134 196,063
0 0 0 0 41,071 348,762 2-46 ENCINITAS PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY (32 0 322,300 4,469,643 0 0 4,147,343 0 0 0 2-47 CARDIFF SANITARY DIVISION FUNDS Operations (501) 609,401 4,902,309 2,435,907
0 0 0 (2,466,826) (424) 608,977 Capital Replacement (502) 7,286,884 285,375 969,199 0 0 (747,200) 2,466,826 1,035,802 8,322,686 Capital Expansion (503) (169,965) 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
(69,965) Debt Service (504) 0 0 747,200 0 0 747,200 0 0 0 Rate Stabilization (506) 1,199,574 28,538 0 0 0 0 0 28,538 1,228,112 TOTAL CSD FUNDS 8,925,894 5,316,222 4,152,306 0 0 0 0 1,163,916
10,089,810 2-48 ENCINITAS SANITARY DIVISION FUNDS Operations (521) 314,851 2,519,405 1,321,286 0 0 0 (1,203,649) (5,530) 309,321 Capital Replacement (522) 725,750 80,856 656,509 0 0
0 1,203,649 627,996 1,353,746 Capital Expansion (523) 1,471,506 123,050 243,585 0 0 0 0 (120,535) 1,350,971 Rate Stabilization (524) 884,280 9,513 0 0 0 0 0 9,513 893,793 TOTAL ESD FUNDS
3,396,387 2,732,824 2,221,380 0 0 0 0 511,444 3,907,831 2-49 SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT FUNDS Operations (531) 938,244 11,489,797 9,271,639 0 0 (1,705,405) (414,093) 98,660 1,036,904
Capital Replacement (534) 7,359,381 402,838 1,115,000 0 0 0 614,959 (97,203) 7,262,178 Debt Service Fund (536) 0 115,000 1,820,405 0 0 1,705,405 0 0 0 Recycled Water (537) 0 495,857
495,857 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rate Stabilization (538) 1,502,831 45,189 0 0 0 0 (200,866) (155,677) 1,347,154 TOTAL SDWD FUNDS 9,800,456 12,548,681 12,702,901 0 0 0 0 (154,220) 9,646,236 INTERNAL
SERVICE FUNDS 2-51 District Services (616) 0 842,737 842,737 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-52 Fleet Maintenance (692) 0 536,402 536,402 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-53 Vehicle Replacement (693) 1,711,243 458,599 500,000
0 0 0 0 (41,401) 1,669,842 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 1,711,243 1,837,738 1,879,139 0 0 0 0 (41,401) 1,669,842 TOTAL CITY/DISTRICT FUNDS 52,726,037 94,511,929 81,316,142 0 0 0 (11,868,390)
1,327,397 54,053,434 2-3
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Adjusted Interfund Interfund Interfund Interfund Current Year Adj. Projected Page Fund Balance Revenue Proposed Transfers Transfers Transfers
Transfers Summary Fund Balance No. FUND NAME (FUND NO.) July 1, 2009 Projections Expenditures Operating Other Debt Service Capital (3-4+5+6+7+8) (2-9) GENERAL FUNDS 2-8 General (101)
14,785,954 50,293,189 46,621,684 (437,800) 129,382 (3,141,407) (737,342) (515,662) 14,270,292 2-12 Self-Insurance (113) 3,150,319 833,896 1,538,286 400,000 0 0 0 (304,390) 2,845,929
2-13 Special Projects Fund (119) 1,033,602 0 0 0 35,732 0 0 35,732 1,069,334 2-15 Civic Center Improvements (152) 244,919 1,065,000 0 0 0 (902,502) (170,000) (7,502) 237,417 n/a Sales
Tax Receivable (192) 745,858 0 0 0 (115,107) 0 0 (115,107) 630,751 2-14 Recreation Programs (146) 335,384 1,475,721 1,372,138 0 0 0 0 103,583 438,967 INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDS 2-16 Gas Tax
(201) 231,434 1,175,405 1,157,652 0 0 0 0 17,753 249,187 2-17 Federal Trans. Grants (202) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-18 State Capital Grants (203) 952,779 604,078 0 0 0 0 (950,000) (345,922)
606,857 2-19 Transnet-Prop A Sales Tax (204) 208,040 1,441,882 0 0 0 0 (2,130,000) (688,118) (480,078) 2-20 Federal TDA Grants (205) 0 367 0 0 0 0 0 367 367 2-21 Coastal Zone Management
Fund (210) 1,262,218 230,000 281,510 37,800 0 0 (204,591) (218,301) 1,043,917 GRANT FUNDS 2-22 C.D.B. Grant (222) 0 722,344 217,529 0 0 0 (504,815) 0 0 2-23 Affordable Housing (225)
67,613 1,570 0 0 0 0 0 1,570 69,183 2-24 Encinitas Housing Authority (226) 78,308 1,215,929 1,215,929 0 0 0 0 0 78,308 2-25 HOME Entitlement (227) 0 655,754 655,754 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-26
Govt/Educational Access (228) 352,769 130,800 90,546 0 0 0 0 40,254 393,023 2-27 Recycling/Solid Waste/HHW (229) 1,323,012 415,323 448,360 0 0 0 0 (33,037) 1,289,975 2-38 Asset Forfeiture
(261) 94,878 1,014 5,000 0 0 0 0 (3,986) 90,892 2-38 Special Law Enforcement (262) 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-38 Federal Special Law Enforce (263) 0 78,112 78,112 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FUNDS 2-28 Park Development Fees (231) 225,668 59,694 0 0 0 0 (150,000) (90,306) 135,362 2-31 Parkland Acquisition Fees (234) (207,380) 159,821 0 0 0 0 (100,000) 59,821 (147,559)
2-29 Flood Control Fees (232) (8,969) 74,246 0 0 0 0 (50,000) 24,246 15,277 2-30 Traffic Mitigation Fees (233) 1,340,886 1,099,285 0 0 0 0 (750,000) 349,285 1,690,171 2-32 Open Space
(235) 4,063 10,763 0 0 0 0 (10,000) 763 4,826 2-33 Recreational Trails (236) 6,680 2,741 0 0 0 0 0 2,741 9,421 2-34 Community Facilities (237) 0 14,275 0 0 (14,275) 0 0 0 0 2-35 In Lieu
Curb Gutter Sidewalks (238) 6,189 63 0 0 0 0 0 63 6,252 2-36 In Lieu Underground Utilities (239) 499,724 4,930 0 0 0 0 0 4,930 504,654 2-37 RTCIP (Regional Arterial System) Fee (241)
0 50,501 500 0 0 0 0 50,001 50,001 2-39 Fire Mitigation Fees (272) 0 35,732 0 0 (35,732) 0 0 0 0 LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING DISTRICTS 2-40 Village Park MID (290) 138,887 32,556 36,732 0
0 0 0 (4,176) 134,711 2-41 Villanitas Road MID (291) 214,942 22,313 16,540 0 0 0 0 5,773 220,715 2-42 Cerro Street MID MID (292) 200,324 39,131 30,192 0 0 0 0 8,939 209,263 2-43 Encinitas
Lighting/Citywide (295) 373,076 1,154,887 1,211,837 0 0 0 (78,800) (135,750) 237,326 2-44 Wiro Park (296) 5,836 11,081 10,166 0 0 0 0 915 6,751 2-45 Encinitas Ranch District (297) 723,940
641,022 557,971 0 0 0 0 83,051 806,991 TOTAL CITY FUNDS 28,390,953 63,853,425 55,646,438 0 0 (4,043,909) (5,835,548) (1,672,470) 26,718,483 Budget Summary (Schedule A) -Fiscal Year 2009-2010
2-4
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Adjusted Interfund Interfund Interfund Interfund Current Year Adj. Projected Page Fund Balance Revenue Proposed Transfers Transfers Transfers
Transfers Summary Fund Balance No. FUND NAME (FUND NO.) July 1, 2009 Projections Expenditures Operating Other Debt Service Capital (3-4+5+6+7+8) (2-9) Budget Summary (Schedule A) -Fiscal
Year 2009-2010 AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK 2-50 Pacific Pines Condominiums (561) 348,762 223,323 199,563 0 0 0 0 23,760 372,522 TOTAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING 348,762 223,323 199,563 0 0 0 0
23,760 372,522 2-46 ENCINITAS PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 0 244,400 4,288,310 0 0 4,043,910 0 0 0 2-47 CARDIFF SANITARY DIVISION FUNDS Operations (501) 608,977 4,947,687 2,578,966 0 0
0 (2,332,956) 35,765 644,742 Capital Replacement (502) 8,322,686 0 997,203 0 0 (711,800) 2,332,956 623,953 8,946,639 Capital Expansion (503) (69,965) 85,425 60,000 0 0 0 0 25,425 (44,540)
Debt Service (504) 0 30,000 741,800 0 0 711,800 0 0 0 Rate Stabilization (506) 1,228,112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,228,112 TOTAL CSD FUNDS 10,089,810 5,063,112 4,377,969 0 0 0 0 685,143 10,774,953
2-48 ENCINITAS SANITARY DIVISION FUNDS Operations (521) 309,321 2,831,441 1,406,880 0 0 0 (1,382,162) 42,399 351,720 Capital Replacement (522) 1,353,746 0 787,169 0 0 0 1,382,162 594,993
1,948,739 Capital Expansion (523) 1,350,971 80,400 0 0 0 0 0 80,400 1,431,371 Rate Stabilization (524) 893,793 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 893,793 TOTAL ESD FUNDS 3,907,831 2,911,841 2,194,049 0 0
0 0 717,792 4,625,623 2-49 SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT FUNDS Operations (531) 1,036,904 12,964,541 10,045,630 0 0 (1,742,810) (862,240) 313,861 1,350,765 Capital Replacement (534) 7,262,178
130,470 1,840,000 0 0 0 506,992 (1,202,538) 6,059,640 Debt Service Fund (536) 0 18,150 1,760,960 0 0 1,742,810 0 0 0 Recycled Water (537) 0 650,000 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rate Stabilization
(535) 1,347,154 15,262 0 0 0 0 355,248 370,510 1,717,664 TOTAL SDWD FUNDS 9,646,236 13,778,423 14,296,590 0 0 0 0 (518,167) 9,128,069 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 2-51 District Services (616)
0 854,311 854,311 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-52 Fleet Maintenance (692) 0 452,439 452,439 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-53 Vehicle Replacement (693) 1,669,842 248,886 910,058 0 0 0 0 (661,172) 1,008,670 INTERNAL
SERVICE FUNDS 1,669,842 1,555,636 2,216,808 0 0 0 0 (661,172) 1,008,670 TOTAL CITY/DISTRICT FUNDS 54,053,434 87,630,160 83,219,727 0 0 1 (5,835,548) (1,425,114) 52,628,320 2-5
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Adjusted Interfund Interfund Interfund Interfund Current Year Adj. Projected Page Fund Balance Revenue Proposed Transfers Transfers Transfers
Transfers Summary Fund Balance No. FUND NAME (FUND NO.) July 1, 2010 Projections Expenditures Operating Other Debt Service Capital (3-4+5+6+7+8) (2-9) GENERAL FUNDS 2-8 General (101)
14,270,292 50,997,845 48,252,445 (339,500) 149,948 (3,091,550) (1,054,000) (1,589,702) 12,680,590 2-12 Self-Insurance (113) 2,845,929 860,830 1,553,808 300,000 0 0 0 (392,978) 2,452,951
2-13 Special Projects Fund (119) 1,069,334 0 0 0 39,892 0 0 39,892 1,109,226 2-15 Civic Center Improvements (152) 237,417 1,070,000 0 0 0 (903,906) (175,000) (8,906) 228,511 n/a Sales
Tax Receivable (192) 630,751 0 0 0 (135,673) 0 0 (135,673) 495,078 2-14 Recreation Programs (146) 438,967 1,499,996 1,392,123 0 0 0 0 107,873 546,840 INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDS 2-16 Gas Tax
(201) 249,187 1,175,405 1,190,809 0 0 0 0 (15,404) 233,783 2-17 Federal Trans. Grants (202) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-18 State Trans Grants (203) 606,857 661,919 0 0 0 0 (850,000) (188,081)
418,776 2-19 Transnet (204) (480,078) 1,490,882 0 0 0 0 (1,200,000) 290,882 (189,196) 2-20 Trans Develop Act Grants (205) 367 367 0 0 0 0 0 367 734 2-21 Coastal Zone Management Fund
(210) 1,043,917 233,405 275,255 39,500 0 0 (227,411) (229,761) 814,156 GRANT FUNDS 2-22 C.D.B. Grant (222) 0 408,350 408,350 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-23 Affordable Housing (225) 69,183 1,570 0
0 0 0 0 1,570 70,753 2-24 Encinitas Housing Authority (226) 78,308 1,246,269 1,246,269 0 0 0 0 0 78,308 2-25 HOME Entitlement (227) 0 211,927 211,927 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-26 Govt/Educational
Access (228) 393,023 130,800 49,428 0 0 0 0 81,372 474,395 2-27 Recycling/Solid Waste/HHW (229) 1,289,975 415,205 453,654 0 0 0 0 (38,449) 1,251,526 2-38 Asset Forfeiture (261) 90,892
1,014 5,000 0 0 0 0 (3,986) 86,906 2-38 Special Law Enforcement (262) 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-38 Federal Special Law Enforce (263) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUNDS
2-28 Park Development Fees ((231) 135,362 59,694 0 0 0 0 (150,000) (90,306) 45,056 2-31 Parkland Acquisition Fees (234) (147,559) 159,821 0 0 0 0 (100,000) 59,821 (87,738) 2-29 Flood
Control Fees (232) 15,277 74,246 0 0 0 0 (50,000) 24,246 39,523 2-30 Traffic Mitigation Fees (233) 1,690,171 494,470 0 0 0 0 0 494,470 2,184,641 2-32 Open Space (235) 4,826 10,763 0
0 0 0 (15,000) (4,237) 589 2-33 Recreational Trails (236) 9,421 2,741 0 0 0 0 0 2,741 12,162 2-34 Community Facilities (237) 0 14,275 0 0 (14,275) 0 0 0 0 2-35 In Lieu Curb Gutter Sidewalks
(238) 6,252 63 0 0 0 0 0 63 6,315 2-36 In Lieu Underground Utilities (239) 504,654 4,930 0 0 0 0 0 4,930 509,584 2-37 RTCIP (Regional Arterial System) Fee (241) 50,001 51,000 500 0 0
0 0 50,500 100,501 2-39 Fire Mitigation Fees (272) 0 39,892 0 0 (39,892) 0 0 0 0 LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING DISTRICTS 2-40 Village Park MID (290) 134,711 32,556 36,735 0 0 0 0 (4,179) 130,532
2-41 Villanitas Road MID (291) 220,715 22,525 16,994 0 0 0 0 5,531 226,246 2-42 Cerro Street MID (292) 209,263 40,573 31,043 31,043 0 0 0 0 9,530 218,793 2-43 Encinitas Landscape/Light.
(295) 237,326 1,167,810 1,229,284 0 0 0 (78,800) (140,274) 97,052 2-44 Wiro Park (296) 6,751 11,081 10,430 0 0 0 0 651 7,402 2-45 Encinitas Ranch District (297) 806,991 641,022 571,186
0 0 0 0 69,836 876,827 TOTAL CITY FUNDS 26,718,483 63,333,246 57,035,240 0 0 (3,995,456) (3,900,211) (1,597,661) 25,120,822 Budget Summary (Schedule A) -Fiscal Year 2010-2011 2-6
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Adjusted Interfund Interfund Interfund Interfund Current Year Adj. Projected Page Fund Balance Revenue Proposed Transfers Transfers Transfers
Transfers Summary Fund Balance No. FUND NAME (FUND NO.) July 1, 2010 Projections Expenditures Operating Other Debt Service Capital (3-4+5+6+7+8) (2-9) Budget Summary (Schedule A) -Fiscal
Year 2010-2011 AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK 2-50 Pacific Pines Condominiums (561) 3 72,522 223,323 201,483 0 0 0 0 21,840 394,362 TOTAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING 372,522 223,323 201,483 0 0 0 0
21,840 394,362 2-46 DEBT SERVICE FUND (321) 0 238,400 4,233,856 0 0 3,995,456 0 0 0 2-47 CARDIFF SANITARY DIVISION FUNDS Operations (501) 644,742 4,711,485 2,769,892 0 0 0 (1,893,862)
47,731 692,473 Capital Replacement (502) 8,946,639 0 1,380,120 0 0 (713,800) 1,893,862 (200,058) 8,746,581 Capital Expansion (503) (44,540) 51,255 0 0 0 0 0 51,255 6,715 Debt Service
(504) 0 30,000 743,800 0 0 713,800 0 0 0 Rate Stabilization (506) 1,228,112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,228,112 TOTAL CSD FUNDS 10,774,953 4,792,740 4,893,812 0 0 0 0 (101,072) 10,673,881 2-48 ENCINITAS
SANITARY DIVISION FUNDS Operations (521) 3 51,720 2,769,875 1,474,319 0 0 0 (1,278,696) 16,860 368,580 Capital Replacement (522) 1 ,948,739 0 896,068 0 0 0 1,278,696 382,628 2,331,367
Capital Expansion (523) 1 ,431,371 339,663 0 0 0 0 0 339,663 1,771,034 Rate Stabilization (525) 8 93,793 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 893,793 TOTAL ESD FUNDS 4,625,623 3,109,538 2,370,387 0 0 0 0 739,151
5,364,774 2-49 SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT FUNDS Operations (531)
1 ,350,765 16,168,572 11,568,085 0 0 (1,736,785) (2,455,925) 407,777 1,758,542 Capital Replacement (534) 6 ,059,640 130,470 2,489,000 0 0 0 2,375,023 16,493 6,076,133 Debt Service (536)
0 18,150 1,754,935 0 0 1,736,785 0 0 0 Recycled Water (537) 0 660,000 660,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rate Stabilization (535) 1 ,717,664 15,262 0 0 0 0 80,902 96,164 1,813,828 TOTAL SDWD FUNDS
9,128,069 16,992,454 16,472,020 0 0 0 0 520,434 9,648,503 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 2-51 District Services (616) 0 962,412 962,412 962,412 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-52 Fleet Maintenance (692) 0 473,800
473,800 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-53 Vehicle Replacement (693) 1,008,670 1,005,583 1,184,000 0 0 0 0 (178,417) 830,253 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 1 ,008,670 2,441,795 2,620,212 0 0 0 0 (178,417) 830,253
TOTAL CITY/DISTRICT FUNDS 52,628,320 91,131,496 87,827,010 0 0 0 (3,900,211) (595,725) 52,032,595 2-7
Schedule C Schedule C FY2008-09 Third Quarterly Review, Proposed FY2009-10 and FY2010-11 Fund/Division FY2008-09 Adjusted Budget Potential Savings Projected Expenses at Year End FY09-10
Proposed $ Increase (Decrease) from FY2008-09 Approved Budget % Change FY10-11 Proposed $ Increase (Decrease) from FY2009-10 Proposed Budget % Change General Government 0020 Community
Projects 60,000 0 60,000 54,000 (6,000) -10% 54,000 0 0% 1110 Legislative/City Council 387,727 (42,340) 345,387 363,662 (24,065) -6% 389,878 26,216 7% 1210 City Manager 676,469 (8,860)
667,609 667,451 (9,018) -1% 713,075 45,624 7% 1211 Arts Administration 137,041 (1,300) 135,741 138,571 1,530 1% 148,185 9,614 7% 1215 Economic Development 292,000 0 292,000 271,600 (20,400)
-7% 282,600 11,000 4% 1220 Human Resources 827,926 (62,129) 765,797 841,655 18,729 2% 868,439 26,784 3% 1230 Library Operations 23,100 (15,000) 8,100 0 (23,100) -100% 0 0 0% 1250 Information
Technology 1,280,484 (13,058) 1,267,426 1,190,372 (22,812) -2% 1,225,129 34,757 3% 1255 Geographic Information 678,108 (4,000) 674,108 603,965 (54,143) -8% 633,936 29,971 5% 1310 City
Clerk 520,257 (1,500) 518,757 539,133 18,876 4% 558,518 19,385 4% 1311 Elections 59,125 0 59,125 0 (32,100) -100% 32,100 32,100 0% 1410 Legal Services 304,000 0 304,000 304,000 0 0%
304,000 0 0% 1510 Financial Services 1,595,777 (61,177) 1,534,600 1,356,686 (239,091) -15% 1,413,136 56,450 4% 1560 Central Services 447,649 (39,900) 407,749 369,933 (72,716) -16% 366,256
(3,677) -1% 1561 Non-Departmental 2,850,096 10,000 2,860,096 2,841,399 8,303 0% 2,956,497 115,098 4% 10,139,759 (239,264) 9,900,495 9,542,427 (456,007) -4.6% 9,945,749 403,322 4.2% Planning
and Building Department 2005 Customer Servicer Admin 692,166 (5,350) 686,816 784,386 92,220 13% 829,823 45,437 6% 2010 Current Planning 1,050,902 (124,531) 926,371 770,294 (280,608)
-27% 801,660 31,366 4% 2015 Cur Plan Applicant Deposits 200,000 0 200,000 100,500 (99,500) -50% 100,500 0 0% 2020 Advanced Planning 508,308 (1,030) 507,278 546,126 37,818 7% 574,436
28,310 5% 2030 Code Enforcement 449,134 (5,550) 443,584 439,472 (9,662) -2% 452,247 12,775 3% 2040 Building Services 1,149,795 (499,059) 650,736 614,849 (534,946) -47% 617,674 2,825
0% 4,050,305 (635,520) 3,414,785 3,255,627 (794,678) -19.6% 3,376,340 120,713 3.7% Public Safety -Law Enforcement 3010 Law Enforcement 11,864,442 (385,000) 11,479,442 11,998,099 133,657
1% 12,683,673 685,574 6% 3021 Parking Enforcement 29,365 (1,350) 28,015 24,000 (5,365) -18% 24,000 0 0% 11,893,807 (386,350) 11,507,457 12,022,099 128,292 1.1% 12,707,673 685,574 5.7%
Public Safety -Fire & Marine Safety Services 3510 Fire Administration 505,580 (2,760) 502,820 516,782 11,202 2% 539,521 22,739 4% 3520 Fire Operations & Support 8,533,849 (130,568) 8,403,281
8,691,509 154,460 2% 8,726,302 34,793 0% 3530 Loss Prevention & Planning 702,543 (33,267) 669,276 694,677 (7,866) -1% 731,419 36,742 5% 3540 Disaster Preparedness 157,720 (3,912) 153,808
160,291 21 0% 178,035 17,744 11% 3550 Marine Safety Services 816,633 (4,231) 812,402 876,753 60,120 7% 857,530 (19,223) -2% 10,716,325 (174,738) 10,541,587 10,940,012 217,937 2.0% 11,032,807
92,795 0.8% 2-8
Schedule C Schedule C FY2008-09 Third Quarterly Review, Proposed FY2009-10 and FY2010-11 Fund/Division FY2008-09 Adjusted Budget Potential Savings Projected Expenses at Year End FY09-10
Proposed $ Increase (Decrease) from FY2008-09 Approved Budget % Change FY10-11 Proposed $ Increase (Decrease) from FY2009-10 Proposed Budget % Change Public Works 4010 Administration
264,193 (10,193) 254,000 261,661 (2,532) -1% 258,582 (3,079) -1% 4020 Emergency Flood Control 60,000 0 60,000 0 (60,000) -100% 0 0 0% 4040 Street Maintenance 558,816 0 558,816 512,882
(45,934) -8% 523,239 10,357 2% 4045 Facility Maint-Civic Center 427,508 0 427,508 312,588 (114,920) -27% 309,705 (2,883) -1% 4046 Facility Maint-Fire Station 147,391 0 147,391 165,128
24,637 18% 167,007 1,879 1% 4047 Facility Maint-PW Yard 106,324 0 106,324 216,302 109,978 103% 204,467 (11,835) -5% 4048 Facility Maint-Library 277,349 0 277,349 271,231 (6,118) -2%
277,104 5,873 2% 4050 Stormwater-Maint Division 631,719 0 631,719 641,286 9,567 2% 668,572 27,286 4% 4055 Stormwater-Flood Control 190,776 0 190,776 134,980 (55,796) -29% 136,622 1,642
1% 2,664,076 (10,193) 2,653,883 2,516,058 (141,118) -5.3% 2,545,298 29,240 1.2% Engineering 6010 City Engineering 2,707,580 (105,009) 2,602,571 2,437,441 (270,139) -10% 2,524,493 87,052
4% 6020 Traffic Engineering 730,383 (6,500) 723,883 731,224 841 0% 774,038 42,814 6% 6050 Clean Water 696,303 (1,216) 695,087 725,550 8,247 1% 757,614 32,064 4% 4,134,266 (112,725) 4,021,541
3,894,215 (261,051) -6.3% 4,056,145 161,930 4.2% Parks and Recreation Department 7010 Administration 543,358 (28,125) 515,233 507,179 (36,179) -7% 525,283 18,104 4% 7020 Park Services
1,260,256 (15,000) 1,245,256 1,246,823 (13,433) -1% 1,281,355 34,532 3% 7030 Beach Services 470,906 (10,000) 460,906 497,174 (29,932) -6% 509,909 12,735 3% 7033 Recreational Trails 130,352
(5,000) 125,352 106,105 (24,247) -19% 108,407 2,302 2% 7040 Recreation Services 659,210 (10,400) 648,810 629,067 (30,143) -5% 644,882 15,815 3% 7044 Community & Senior Center 1,095,394
(5,000) 1,090,394 1,142,778 47,384 4% 1,174,692 31,914 3% 7050 Animal Regulation 315,175 0 315,175 322,120 6,945 2% 343,905 21,785 7% 4,474,651 (73,525) 4,401,126 4,451,246 (79,605)
-1.8% 4,588,433 137,187 3.1% Total All Departments/Divisions 48,073,189 (1,632,315) 46,440,874 46,621,684 (1,386,230) -2.9% 48,252,445 1,630,761 3.5% FY2008-09 Net Adjustments/(Savings)
(1,632,315) 2-9
Funding Source: General Fund (101) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance
16,833,998 14,785,954 14,270,292 12,680,590 11,089,438 11,369,099 11,790,149 2 Revenues Property Taxes, Current Secured 23,886,957 24,378,442 24,866,011 25,611,991 26,508,411 27,568,747
28,671,497 Property Taxes in Lieu of VLF 5,069,228 4,977,475 5,077,025 5,229,336 5,412,363 5,628,857 5,854,011 Sales Tax Triple Flip 2,713,614 2,418,500 2,418,500 2,466,870 2,516,207
2,566,532 2,617,862 All Other Property Taxes 2,605,576 2,493,600 2,493,600 2,543,472 2,594,341 2,646,228 2,699,153 Sales and Use Tax 7,805,386 7,255,500 7,255,500 7,400,610 7,548,622
7,699,595 7,853,587 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) 872,221 864,808 864,808 882,104 899,746 917,741 936,096 Short Term Vacation Rentals 0 80,000 80,000 81,600 83,232 84,897 86,595 Real
Property Transfer 360,000 280,000 280,000 285,600 291,312 297,138 303,081 All Franchise Taxes 2,190,000 2,115,435 2,166,850 2,210,187 2,254,391 2,299,479 2,345,468 Licenses and Permits
163,000 196,000 196,000 199,920 203,918 207,997 212,157 Motor Vehicle License Fees 104,685 150,000 150,000 154,500 154,500 154,500 154,500 All Other Intergovernmental 107,421 92,200
92,200 87,700 89,454 91,243 93,068 Internal Cost Allocation Charges 1,793,718 1,347,174 1,414,536 1,464,045 1,515,286 1,568,321 1,623,213 Development Processing Fees 2,246,717 1,982,885
1,991,102 2,289,767 2,817,000 2,901,510 2,988,555 Use of Money (includes Investment Earnings) 1,000,127 841,020 841,563 858,394 875,562 893,073 910,935 Fines & Penalties/All Other Revenues
856,180 820,150 810,150 826,353 842,880 859,738 876,932 3 Other Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues 51,774,830 50,293,189 50,997,845 52,592,450 54,607,226 56,385,596 58,226,710 5a
Operating Expenditures Personnel 23,209,156 23,174,534 23,857,993 24,113,387 24,233,949 24,355,270 24,477,047 Anticipated CalPERS Rate Increase -5% 0 0 762,716 769,253 773,099 776,964
Materials & & Supplies 946,961 763,082 766,893 782,231 797,875 813,833 830,110 Contracts & Services 21,894,960 20,827,639 21,771,714 22,419,862 23,094,679 23,789,851 24,505,996 Internal
Cost Allocation Expenses 1,676,500 1,664,399 1,704,757 1,721,805 1,739,023 1,756,413 1,773,977 Capital Outlay 147,563 21,382 28,658 134,163 134,163 134,164 134,165 Debt Service/Leases/Other
132,774 122,430 122,430 132,774 132,774 132,774 132,774 5b Off-Cycle Appropriations/Adjustments FY2008-09 Continuing Appropriations 46,900 Potential Savings Identified Mid-Year (1,632,315)
Mid-Year Review 24,125 Third Quarter Requests -Transfers (5,750) 6 New Programs Lifeguard Safety Services 48,218 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Operating Expenditures 46,440,874 46,621,684 48,252,445
50,066,937 50,901,716 51,755,404 52,631,033 8 Capital Improvement Projects/Work Projects 4,105,866 2,687,342 1,054,000 607,000 676,000 1,005,000 1,240,000 Project Returns 0 (1,950,000)
0 0 0 0 0 Total Capital/Work Projects 4,105,866 737,342 1,054,000 607,000 676,000 1,005,000 1,240,000 9 Total Expenditures (5+6+7) 50,546,740 47,359,026 49,306,445 50,673,937 51,577,716
52,760,404 53,871,033 2-10
Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 10 Transfers to the General Fund-Revenue
From Community Facilities Impact Fees (Fund 19,124 14,275 14,275 39,970 48,353 57,100 68,520 From Gas Tax Fund (201) 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 From Encinitas Ranch Sales Tax Repayment 82,381
115,107 135,673 141,100 456,374 0 0 10a Total Transfers to the General Fund 261,505 129,382 149,948 181,070 504,727 57,100 68,520 Transfers from the General Fund-Expenses To Sand Replenishment
Program (210) 32,400 37,800 39,500 39,500 39,500 39,500 39,500 To Self-Insurance Program (113) 533,803 400,000 300,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 To Debt Service funds (321) 2,971,436
3,141,407 3,091,550 3,001,234 2,565,077 2,571,741 2,531,403 10b Total Transfers from the General Fund 3,537,639 3,579,207 3,431,050 3,690,734 3,254,577 3,261,241 3,220,903 10c Net Transfers
To/From General Fund (3,276,134) (3,449,825) (3,281,102) (3,509,664) (2,749,850) 2,749,850) (3,204,141) (3,152,383) 11 Current Year Net ( 3-8+9C ) (2,048,044) (515,662) (1,589,702) (1,591,152)
279,660 421,051 1,203,294 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+10) 14,785,954 14,270,292 12,680,590 11,089,438 11,369,099 11,790,149 12,993,444 13 Contingency Reserves (20% of expenditures) 9,601,583
9,324,337 9,650,489 10,013,387 10,180,343 10,351,081 10,526,207 14 Budget Stabilization Reserve (5% of revenues) 2,672,645 2,514,659 2,549,892 1,051,849 1,018,034 1,035,108 1,052,621
15 Future Project Reserves (12-13-14) 2,511,726 2,431,296 480,209 24,202 170,721 403,961 1,414,616 Budget Stabilization Reserve 5%FY10-FY11; 2% FY12-FY15 Proj. Description of General
Fund Projects: Prior Year(s) Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Project No. #8 CIP/Work Projects: Appropriations FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15
Total Consultant Studies/Work Projects 1 Comprehensive General Plan Update (TIER I) 471,658 753,342 125,000 1,350,000 2 Digital Topography/GIS Basemap Updates 384,100 82,500 30,000 30,000
526,600 3 Facade Improvement Incentive Program 150,000 . 5,000 . 5,000 5,000 165,000 4 Financial Studies: Fees Studies/GASB 45 Reports 60,000 60,000 60,000 180,000 5 Green Building Incentive
Program 10,000 10,000 20,000 6 H.T.E. Replacement/ERP 527,757 333,000 334,000 0 1,194,757 7 Lagoon Monitoring (NPDES Requirement) 2,665,394 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000
3,145,394 8 Technology Replacement Project 144,500 150,000 207,000 216,000 95,000 205,000 1,017,500 9 Citywide Flood /Channel Maint Permitting Program 41,000 110,000 151,000 Drainage
Projects 10 Storm Drain Repair Fund*** 915,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2,115,000 Public Facilities 11 Library (Savings -Return to General Fund for Reallocation)
(1,200,000) (1,200,000) 12 Library AV Room Equipment 6,000 34,000 10,000 50,000 Parks, Beaches & Recreation 13 Hall Property Design/Development*** (TIER I) 9,387,484 850,000 150,000
0 175,000 500,000 750,000 11,812,484 14 Recreational Trails Development Fund (TIER I) 485,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 575,000 Streets & Rail Corridor 15 Rail Quiet Zone @Chesterfield (TIER
III) (750,000) (750,000) TOTAL ALL GENERAL FUND PROJECTS 15,033,393 737,342 1,054,000 607,000 676,000 1,005,000 1,240,000 20,352,735 *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding
sources-See individual projects for details. Additional Hall Property Funding -Park Development Fees 150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 225,000 250,000 Annual Hall Property Funding 1,000,000
300,000 200,000 375,000 725,000 1,000,000 2-11
Funding Source: Self Insurance Fund (113) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15
1 Balance 3,130,319 3,150,319 2,845,929 2,452,951 2,332,729 2,197,902 2,011,886 2 Baseline Revenues 892,965 833,896 860,830 797,629 797,629 761,629 697,629 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 Non-Discretionary 792,905 733,896 760,830 747,629 747,629 729,629 697,629 CSD/ESD Liability Allocation 100,000 100,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 32,000 0 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) * 892,965 833,896 860,830 797,629 797,629 761,629 697,629 5 Baseline Expenditures 1,406,768 1,538,286 1,553,808
1,567,851 1,582,456 1,597,645 1,613,442 Personnel 321,267 334,059 351,081 365,124 379,729 394,918 410,715 Materials & Supplies 5,440 3,790 3,790 3,790 3,790 3,790 3,790 Contracts & Services
1,080,061 1,200,437 1,198,937 1,198,937 1,198,937 1,198,937 1,198,937 Internal Cost Allocation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fixed Assets/Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 1,406,768 1,538,286 1,553,808 1,567,851 1,582,456 1,597,645 1,613,442 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 1,406,768
1,538,286 1,553,808 1,567,851 1,582,456 1,597,645 1,613,442 10 Transfers In (Out) (G/F 101) 533,803 400,000 300,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 20,000
(304,390) (392,978) (120,222) (134,827) (186,016) (265,813) 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 3,150,319 2,845,929 2,452,951 2,332,729 2,197,902 2,011,886 1,746,073 13a Contingency Reserves-City
2,881,846 2,472,330 1,966,151 1,795,929 1,611,102 1,393,086 1,127,273 13b Contingency Reserves -CSD 68,473 118,473 168,473 218,473 268,473 300,473 300,473 13c Contingency Reserves -ESD
200,000 255,126 318,327 318,327 318,327 318,327 318,327 *Revenues include transfer from CSD/ESD The Self Insurance Fund was established to act as an internal insurance company, providing
the City departments, Cardiff Sanitary Division (CSD) and Encinitas Sanitary Division (ESD) with coverage for liability, property, vehicles, separation pay and other miscellaneous exposures.
City departments and the enterprise funds pay premium allocations into the 113 Fund from their budgets. There are no capital improvement projects associated with this fund. 2-12
Funding Source: Special Projects Fund (Fund 119) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14
FY 14/15 1 Balance 719,971 1,033,602 1,069,334 1,109,226 1,178,636 1,261,055 1,356,483 2 Baseline Revenues 214,031 0 0 0 0 0 0 Investment Earnings 214,031 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Other Revenue
(not used) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 214,031 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Personnel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Materials & Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contracts & Services
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal Cost Allocation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fixed Assets/Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Transfers In (Out) 99,600 35,732 39,892 69,410 82,419 95,428 112,773 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 )
313,631 35,732 39,892 69,410 82,419 95,428 112,773 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 1,033,602 1,069,334 1,109,226 1,178,636 1,261,055 1,356,483 1,469,256 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 1,033,602 1,069,334 1,109,226 1,178,636 1,261,055 1,356,483 1,469,256 Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project FY
08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total No current projects TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual
projects for details. The Special Projects Fund was established to track the 2006 Proceeds of Bonds. A bond issuance of $20,000,000 resulted in $18,268,000 in proceeds. The bonds raised
funding for the City Council's high priority capital projects including the public works facility, fire station reconstruction projects and the Phase 1 Development of the former Hall
property. 2-13
Funding Source: Recreation Programs Fund (146) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY
14/15 1 Balance 276,414 335,384 438,967 546,840 640,017 717,747 779,248 2 Baseline Revenues 1,436,618 1,425,721 1,449,996 1,474,756 1,500,011 1,525,771 1,552,047 Grants/Donations 122,750
94,000 94,000 94,000 94,000 94,000 94,000 Program Fees 1,189,923 1,213,721 1,237,996 1,262,756 1,288,011 1,313,771 1,340,047 Property Rental 118,000 118,000 118,000 118,000 118,000 118,000
118,000 Investment Earnings 5,945 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 New Revenues 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Discretionary 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Non-Discretionary 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 1,436,618 1,475,721 1,499,996 1,524,756 1,550,011 1,575,771 1,602,047 5 Baseline Expenditures 1,377,648 1,372,138 1,392,123 1,431,579 1,472,281
1,514,270 1,557,592 Personnel 449,384 477,149 494,779 514,570 535,153 556,559 578,821 Materials & & Supplies 128,000 128,900 128,900 131,478 134,108 136,790 139,526 Contracts & Services
658,552 656,994 653,894 666,972 680,311 693,918 707,796 Internal Cost Allocation 133,252 109,095 114,550 118,559 122,709 127,004 131,449 Fixed Assets/Debt Service 8,460 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 1,377,648 1,372,138 1,392,123 1,431,579 1,472,281 1,514,270 1,557,592 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total
Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 1,377,648 1,372,138 1,392,123 1,431,579 1,472,281 1,514,270 1,557,592 10 Transfers In (Out) (not used) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 58,970 103,583
107,873 93,177 77,730 61,501 44,455 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 335,384 438,967 546,840 640,017 717,747 779,248 823,703 13a Community & Senior Center Capital/Furniture/Fixture Reserve
193,149 252,149 311,149 370,149 429,149 488,149 547,149 13b Contingency Reserves 142,235 186,818 235,691 269,868 288,598 291,099 276,554 The Replacement Reserve consists of 50% of Property
Rental Income each year to provide for furnishings and equipment for the Community Center. There are no capital improvement projects associated with this fund. 2-14
Funding Source: Civic Center Improvements (Fund 152) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY
13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 261,557 244,919 237,417 228,511 220,059 208,892 207,332 2 Baseline Revenues 1,059,269 1,065,000 1,070,000 1,075,000 1,080,000 1,085,000 1,090,000 Rent 1,045,000
1,065,000 1,070,000 1,075,000 1,080,000 1,085,000 1,090,000 Investment Earnings 14,269 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers-in from Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 1,059,269 1,065,000 1,070,000 1,075,000 1,080,000 1,085,000 1,090,000 5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 150,000 170,000 175,000 180,000 185,000 190,000 195,000 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 150,000 170,000 175,000
180,000 185,000 190,000 195,000 10A Transfers Out To Fund 321-Series A (580,883) (605,867) (600,771) (604,227) (606,132) (601,625) (600,750) 10B Transfers Out To Fund 321-Series B (299,236)
(296,635) (303,135) (299,225) (300,035) (294,935) (298,797) 10C HVAC (45,788) 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) (16,638) (7,502) (8,906) (8,452) (11,167) (1,560) (4,547) 12
Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 244,919 237,417 228,511 220,059 208,892 207,332 202,785 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 244,919 237,417 228,511 220,059 208,892
207,332 202,785 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY08/09 FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 FY15 Total
Civic Center Improvements 150,000 170,000 175,000 180,000 185,000 190,000 195,000 Ongoing NA TOTAL 150,000 170,000 175,000 180,000 185,000 190,000 195,000 0 NA The Civic Center Improvement
Fund was established to collect the rents from the various users of the Civic Center, which then fund the debt service requirements (Fund 321) and pay for major maintenance and improvements
improvements to common areas of the Civic Center. 2-15
Funding Source: Gas Tax Fund (201) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Beginning
Fund Balance 283,893 231,434 249,187 233,783 187,996 110,181 4,541 2 Baseline Revenues 1,249,398 1,175,405 1,175,405 1,192,655 1,210,164 1,233,859 1,258,028 Non-Discretionary (State
Intergovernmental) 1,230,420 1,157,500 1,157,500 1,174,750 1,192,259 1,215,954 1,240,123 Other Agency Revenue 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 Investment Earnings 2,378 1,305
1,305 1,305 1,305 1,305 1,305 Cost Recovery 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 1,249,398 1,175,405 1,175,405 1,192,655
1,210,164 1,233,859 1,258,028 5 Baseline Expenditures 1,141,857 1,157,652 1,190,809 1,238,441 1,287,979 1,339,498 1,393,078 Personnel 576,588 597,383 630,540 655,762 681,992 709,272
737,643 Materials & Supplies 204,267 187,367 187,367 194,862 202,656 210,762 219,193 Contracts Contracts & Services 355,900 367,800 367,800 382,512 397,812 413,725 430,274 Internal Cost
Allocation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fixed Assets/Debt Service 5,102 5,102 5,102 5,306 5,518 5,739 5,969 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6 ) 1,141,857 1,157,652
1,190,809 1,238,441 1,287,979 1,339,498 1,393,078 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 6+7 ) 1,141,857 1,157,652 1,190,809 1,238,441 1,287,979 1,339,498 1,393,078
10 Transfers In (Out) (160,000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-8+9) (52,459) 17,753 (15,404) (45,787) (77,815) (105,639) (135,050) 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+10) 231,434 249,187
233,783 187,996 110,181 4,541 (130,509) 13 Contingency Reserves 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 The State of California collects and distributes the Gas Tax revenue
based on a per capita formula. The gasoline tax is an 18-cent per gallon tax on fuel used to propel a motor vehicle or aircraft. Use of gasoline tax is restricted to research, planning,
construction, improvement, maintenance and operation of public streets and highways or public mass transit guideways. The Street Maintenance Division which is funded primarily by the
Gas Tax Fund is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the City's street-related infrastructure. In-house crews maintain the City's streets, shoulders, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, asphalt
berms, and bridges; install and replace signage; and provide emergency response services. Contract services are also utilized to provide services such as pavement surfacing, street striping,
and pavement legends. 2-16
Funding Source: Federal Capital Grants (202) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY
14/15 1 Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Baseline Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 New Revenues 451,290 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 451,290 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures
(5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 451,290 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 451,290 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 )
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed
Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total Leuc/N.Hwy101/Vulcan Intersection*** 451,290 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 451,290 TOTAL 451,290 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 451,290 *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual projects for details. Projects in this category are funded
with grants from other agencies. 2-17
Funding Source: State Capital Grant Fund (203) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14
FY 14/15 1 Balance 0 952,779 606,857 418,776 250,553 102,782 26,079 2 Baseline Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 New Revenues 5,552,779
604,078 661,919 681,777 702,230 723,297 744,996 Prop 42 Revenue 608,968 604,078 661,919 681,777 702,230 723,297 744,996 Prop 1B Revenue 940,436 0 0 0 0 0 0 STIP/TCRP 4,000,000 0 0 0
0 0 0 Investment Earnings 3,375 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 5,552,779 604,078 661,919 681,777 702,230 723,297 744,996 5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 4,600,000 950,000 850,000 850,000 850,000 800,000 750,000 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 4,600,000 950,000
850,000 850,000 850,000 800,000 750,000 . 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 952,779 (345,922) (188,081) (168,223) (147,770) (76,703) (5,004)
12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 952,779 606,857 418,776 250,553 102,782 26,079 21,075 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 952,779 606,857 418,776 250,553 102,782
26,079 21,075 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15
Total Grade Separated Pedestrian Rail Crossings*** 880,000 4,000,000 13,395,231 18,275,231 Annual Street Overlay Program*** Ongoing 600,000 950,000 850,000 850,000 850,000 800,000 750,000
Ongoing 5,650,000 TOTAL 880,000 4,600,000 950,000 850,000 850,000 850,000 800,000 750,000 13,395,231 23,925.231 *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual
projects for details. This fund includes the City's share of the Proposition 1B -Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 and Proposition Proposition
42 Local Street and Road Improvements monies. 2-18
Funding Source: Transnet Fund (204) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1
Balance (1,367,061) 208,040 (480,078) (189,196) 102,686 415,568 690,450 2 Baseline Revenues 1,424,101 1,441,882 1,490,882 1,541,882 1,622,882 1,694,882 1,762,362 Transnet 1,479,000 1,434,000
1,483,000 1,534,000 1,615,000 1,687,000 1,754,480 Third Quarter Adjustment (66,790) Investment Earnings 11,891 7,882 7,882 7,882 7,882 7,882 7,882 3 New Revenues 1,091,000 0 0 0 0 0
0 Economic Stimulus Funds (ARRA) 1,091,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 2,515,101 1,441,882 1,490,882 1,541,882 1,622,882 1,694,882 1,762,362 5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects
940,000 2,130,000 1,200,000 1,250,000 1,310,000 1,420,000 1,530,000 9 Total Expenditures ( 7+8) 940,000 2,130,000 1,200,000 1,250,000 1,310,000 1,420,000 1,530,000 10 Transfers In (Out)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-8+9 ) 1,575,101 (688,118) 290,882 291,882 312,882 274,882 232,362 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 208,040 (480,078) (189,196) 102,686 415,568 690,450
922,812 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 208,040 (480,078) (189,196) 102,686 415,568 690,450 922,812 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total Annual Street Overlay Program*** Ongoing 450,000 150,000 300,000
350,000 410,000 520,000 630,000 Ongoing NA Traffic Safety/Calming Improvements*** Ongoing 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Ongoing NA Traffic Signal Modifications
Ongoing 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Ongoing NA N. Coast Highway 101 Streetscape 1,700,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 TBD 4,200,000 Encinitas/NCTD
Transit Parking Lot 40,000 1,280,000 1,320,000 Pavement Management Plan 100,000 100,000 Safe Routes to Schools 1,683,608 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2,283,608 Birmingham
Drive Curb and Gutter (CLOSED) (150,000) (150,000) Santa Fe Drive I-5 MacKinnon Avenue (moved to Traffic Mit) (200,000) (200,000) TOTAL 3,383,608 940,000 2,130,000 1,200,000 1,250,000
1,310,000 1,420,000 1,530,000 0 7,553,608 *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual projects for details. In 1988, the voters of San Diego County approved
a ballot proposition to pay for improvements to the overall transportation system by increasing the local sales tax by ½% for 20 years. This tax, called TransNet, is designated for specific
transportation-related projects and expired in 2008. Voters approved an extension of this tax for an additional 40 years. These funds are administered by the San Diego Association of
Government and apportioned among the various agencies on a formula basis. 2-19
Funding Source: TDA (Transportation Development Act) Grant Fund (205) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12
FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 0 0 367 734 734 734 734 2 Baseline Revenues 0 367 367 0 0 0 0 Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest 0 367 367 0 0 0 0 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 0 367 367 0 0 0 0 5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures
(5 + 6 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7+8) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 0 367 367 0 0
0 0 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 0 367 734 734 734 734 734 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 0 367 734 734 734 734 734 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total No current project allocations TOTAL 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The following projects are financed either partially or entirely with TDA Grant funds. TDA (Transportation Development Act Funds) Grant funds are allocated by SANDAG. These
funds are actually discretionary TransNet money that is distributed on a competitive grant basis. 2-20
Funding Source: Coastal Zone Management Fund (210) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14
FY 14/15 1 Balance 1,627,362 1,262,218 1,043,917 814,156 782,848 772,379 757,535 2 Baseline Revenues 244,359 230,000 233,405 238,073 242,835 247,691 252,645 Transient Occupancy Taxes
(2%) 211,065 230,000 233,405 238,073 242,835 247,691 252,645 Investment Earnings 33,294 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 244,359 230,000 233,405 238,073
242,835 247,691 252,645 5 Baseline Expenditures 275,591 281,510 275,255 283,881 292,804 302,036 311,587 Personnel 117,755 110,534 114,501 119,081 123,844 128,798 133,950 Materials &
Supplies 57,800 53,000 53,000 54,060 55,141 56,244 57,369 Contracts & Services 79,219 78,415 66,215 67,539 68,890 70,268 71,673 Internal Cost Allocation 20,817 39,561 41,539 43,201 44,929
46,726 48,595 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 275,591 281,510 275,255 283,881 292,804 302,036 311,587 8 CIP's/Work Projects 366,312 204,591 227,411
25,000 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 641,903 486,101 502,666 308,881 292,804 302,036 311,587 10 Transfers In (Out) General Fund (101) 32,400 37,800 39,500 39,500 39,500 39,500
39,500 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) (365,144) (218,301) (229,761) (31,308) (10,469) (14,844) (19,442) 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 1,262,218 1,043,917 814,156 782,848 772,379 757,535
738,093 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 1,262,218 1,043,917 814,156 782,848 772,379 757,535 738,093 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total Sand Compatibility Opportunistic Use Program 33,300 178,901 17,180
40,000 25,000 294,381 SANDAG -Regional Beach Sand Proj 66,500 187,411 187,411 187,411 628,733 TOTAL 99,800 366,312 204,591 227,411 25,000 0 0 0 0 923,114 *** Projects with asterisks
have additional funding sources-See individual projects for details. This fund was established following the election held November 3, 1998, increasing the hotel Transient-occupancy
tax (TOT) from 8% to 10%. The additional 2% tax will be used for the beach sand replenishment and stabilization programs. 2-21
Funding Source: Community Development Block Grant ( 222) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY12/13
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Baseline Revenues 396,456 396,456 408,350 420,600 433,218 446,215 459,601 a. Annual Grant 396,456 396,456 408,350 420,600 433,218 446,215
459,601 b. Revenues 0 325,887 0 0 0 0 0 Funds Reallocation 0 57,496 0 0 0 0 0 Program Reallocation 0 268,391 0 0 0 0 0 3 New Revenues 107,683 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stimulus 107,683 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 +4 ) 504,139 722,343 408,350 420,600 433,218 446,215 459,601 5 Baseline Expenditures 409,212 217,529 408,350 420,600 433,218 446,215 459,601 Planning Administration
79,291 79,291 81,670 84,120 86,644 89,243 91,920 Other Activities 257,697 78,770 265,428 273,390 281,591 290,040 298,741 Public Services 72,224 59,468 61,252 63,090 64,983 66,932 68,940
6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (6 + 7) 409,212 217,529 408,350 420,600 433,218 446,215 459,601 8 CIP's/Work Projects 94,927 504,814 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total
Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 504,139 722,343 408,350 420,600 433,218 446,215 459,601 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net (5-10+11) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+12) 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11
FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total Melba Road Sidewalk Improvements 94,927 197,073 292,000 Citywide Sidewalk Replacement 250,305 250,305 Regal Road Sidewalk Improvements
57,436 57,436 TOTAL 94,927 504,814 0 0 0 0 0 0 599,741 *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual projects for details. Transfers In (Out) (not used)
Community Development Block Grant (CBDG) monies are allocated annually to a range of activities that primarily benefit low income persons and households or improve lower-income neighborhoods.
Eligible activities include community services, capital improvements, public facilities, affordable housing, and economic development. The City receives an annual entitlement through
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 2-22
Funding Source: Affordable Housing (225) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15
1 Balance 65,806 67,613 69,183 70,753 72,323 73,893 75,463 2 Baseline Revenues 1,807 1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570 In Lieu Fees* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Investment Earnings 1,807 1,570 1,570
1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 1,807 1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570
5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures
( 7 + 8 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 1,807 1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 67,613 69,183 70,753 72,323 73,893 75,463
77,033 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 67,613 69,183 70,753 72,323 73,893 75,463 77,033 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total No current projects TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * No estimate can be established,
as these Fees are on a case by case basis. *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual projects for details. Transfers In (Out) The Affordable Housing
Trust Fund was created from administrative fees associated with affordable housing projects and in lieu fees collected from residential developers. Funds can be utilized for various
affordable housing and homeless projects. 2-23
Funding Source: Housing Authority (226) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15
1 Balance 74,208 78,308 78,308 78,308 78,308 78,308 78,308 2 Baseline Revenues 1,192,150 1,213,580 1,243,920 1,281,238 1,319,675 1,359,265 1,400,043 Annual Grant 1,192,150 1,213,580
1,243,920 1,281,238 1,319,675 1,359,265 1,400,043 3 Investment Earnings 0 2,349 2,349 2,349 2,349 2,349 2,349 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 1,192,150 1,215,929 1,246,269 1,283,587 1,322,024
1,361,614 1,402,392 5 Baseline Expenditures 1,188,050 1,215,929 1,246,269 1,283,587 1,322,024 1,361,614 1,402,392 Planning Administration 119,333 129,176 132,406 136,378 140,470 144,684
149,024 Programs/Other Activities 936,717 986,753 1,013,863 1,047,209 1,081,554 1,116,930 1,153,368 Federal Housing Subsidy 132,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 6
New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 1,188,050 1,215,929 1,246,269 1,283,587 1,322,024 1,361,614 1,402,392 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total
Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 1,188,050 1,215,929 1,246,269 1,283,587 1,322,024 1,361,614 1,402,392 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 4,100 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Ending Fund Balance
(1+11) 78,308 78,308 78,308 78,308 78,308 78,308 78,308 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 78,308 78,308 78,308 78,308 78,308 78,308 78,308 Prior Year Approved
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total No current projects TOTAL
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual projects for details. Transfers In (Out) The Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program provides
rental assistance for 136 households. Each tenant pays 30% of income towards rent and the Housing Authority pays the difference between the tenant payment and the market rent. The Housing
Authority provides preferences for persons with disabilities, senior citizens 62 and up, and working families and persons who live or work in Encinitas. 2-24
Funding Source: H.O.M.E. (227) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Baseline Revenues 205,754 205,754 211,927 218,284 224,833 231,578 238,525 Annual Grant 205,754 205,754 211,927 218,284 224,833 231,578 238,525 3 New Revenues 656,004
450,000 0 0 0 0 0 Funds Reallocation 206,004 450,000 0 0 0 0 0 Program Revenue 450,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 861,758 655,754 211,927 218,284 224,833 231,578 238,525
5 Baseline Expenditures 861,758 655,754 211,927 218,284 224,833 231,578 238,525 Personnel 6,398 6,398 6,590 6,787 6,992 7,201 7,417 Programs 855,360 649,356 205,337 211,497 217,841 224,377
231,108 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 861,758 655,754 211,927 218,284 224,833 231,578 238,525 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures
( 7 + 8 ) 861,758 655,754 211,927 218,284 224,833 231,578 238,525 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Contingency
Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prior Year Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10
FY 10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total No current projects TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers In (Out) The Home Investment Partnership program provides funding for various
affordable housing activities, including new construction, rehabilitation, home ownership, and rental assistance. The City is a participant in the County HOME Consortium, which includes
6 other jurisdictions. 2-25
Funding Source: Governmental/Educational Access Fund (228) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 281,340 352,769 393,023 474,395 556,907 640,566 725,380 2 Baseline Revenues 135,556 130,800 130,800 133,416 136,084 138,806 141,582 Franchise Fees 130,800
130,800 130,800 133,416 136,084 138,806 141,582 Investment Earnings 4,756 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total
Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 135,556 130,800 130,800 133,416 136,084 138,806 141,582 5 Baseline Expenditures 64,127 90,546 49,428 50,904 52,425 53,992 55,605 Personnel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Materials
& Supplies 1,500 1,100 1,500 1,530 1,561 1,592 1,624 Contracts & Services 62,627 87,800 46,200 47,586 49,014 50,484 51,999 Internal Cost Allocation 0 1,646 1,728 1,788 1,851 1,916 1,983
Fixed Assets/Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures
( 7 + 8 ) 64,127 90,546 49,428 50,904 52,425 53,992 55,605 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 71,429 40,254 81,372 82,512 83,659 84,814 85,977 12 Ending
Fund Balance (1+11) 352,769 393,023 474,395 556,907 640,566 725,380 811,357 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 352,769 393,023 474,395 556,907 640,566 725,380
811,357 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total
No current projects TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 This fund was created to account for the Governmental/Educational access monies received from cable communication companies as part of franchise
renewal agreements. The funds are used to obtain capital equipment and support operating expense to televise City Council meetings for cable cast on cable systems and Webcast City Council
and Planning Commission meetings. 2-26
Funding Source: Recycling/Solid Waste/Household Hazardous Waste Fund (229) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11
FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 1,429,104 1,323,012 1,289,975 1,251,526 1,196,070 1,125,318 1,038,761 2 Baseline Revenues 446,704 415,323 415,205 413,000 413,000 413,000
413,000 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 446,704 415,323 415,205 413,000 413,000 413,000 413,000 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 446,704 415,323 415,205 413,000 413,000 413,000 413,000 5 Baseline Expenditures 552,796 448,360 453,654 468,456 483,752 499,557 515,889 Personnel
124,989 108,270 112,102 116,586 121,250 126,100 131,143 Materials & Supplies 15,000 11,000 11,000 11,220 11,444 11,673 11,907 Contracts & Services 372,860 294,498 294,230 303,057 312,149
321,513 331,158 Internal Cost Allocation 39,947 34,592 36,322 37,593 38,909 40,271 41,680 Fixed Assets/Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal
Expenditures (5 + 6) 552,796 448,360 453,654 468,456 483,752 499,557 515,889 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 552,796 448,360 453,654 468,456 483,752
499,557 515,889 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) (106,092) (33,037) (38,449) (55,456) (70,752) (86,557) (102,889) 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 1,323,012
1,289,975 1,251,526 1,196,070 1,125,318 1,038,761 935,872 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 1,323,012 1,289,975 1,251,526 1,196,070 1,125,318 1,038,761
935,872 This fund was created in Mid-Year 2000 to track revenues and expenditures related to Solid Waste disposal, Recycling and Household Hazardous Waste programs and all Grants associated
with the programs. 2-27
Funding Source: Park Development Fees (Fund 231) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14
FY 14/15 1 Balance 145,518 225,668 135,362 45,056 9,150 8,044 16,738 2 Baseline Revenues 80,150 59,694 59,694 164,094 198,894 233,694 280,094 Fees 230,213 58,000 58,000 162,400 197,200
232,000 278,400 Third Quarter Adjustment (152,441) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Investment Earnings 2,378 1,694 1,694 1,694 1,694 1,694 1,694 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 80,150 59,694 59,694 164,094 198,894 233,694 280,094 5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 282,500 250,000 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 0 150,000 150,000 200,000
200,000 225,000 250,000 10 Transfer to (not used) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 80,150 (90,306) (90,306) (35,906) (1,106) 8,694 30,094 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 225,668
135,362 45,056 9,150 8,044 16,738 46,832 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 225,668 135,362 45,056 9,150 8,044 16,738 46,832 Prior Year Approved Proposed
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Projects Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total Hall Property Design & Development***
150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 225,000 250,000 TBD NA Standard Pacific Park Site Development*** 57,500 57,500 TOTAL 0 0 150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 282,500 250,000 0 57,500 ***
Projects with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual projects for details. Park Development fees are collected from builders or developers for the purpose of defraying
the cost of constructing recreation facilities in the vicinity of the new building or development. 2-28
Funding Source: Flood Control Fees (Fund 232) Six-Year Cashflow Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15
1 Balance (36,265) (8,969) 15,277 39,523 63,769 88,015 112,261 2 Baseline Revenues 82,296 74,246 74,246 74,246 74,246 74,246 74,246 Fees (Residential) 62,496 56,284 56,284 56,284 56,284
56,284 56,284 Fees (Commercial) 19,800 16,307 16,307 16,307 16,307 16,307 16,307 Investment Earnings 0 1,655 1,655 1,655 1,655 1,655 1,655 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 82,296 74,246 74,246 74,246 74,246 74,246 74,246 5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 55,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 55,000 50,000 50,000
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 27,296 24,246 24,246 24,246 24,246 24,246 24,246 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) (8,969)
15,277 39,523 63,769 88,015 112,261 136,507 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves (8,969) 15,277 39,523 63,769 88,015 112,261 136,507 Prior Year Proposed Proposed
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total Cardiff Town Center Storm Drain Replacement/Realignm
ent 20,000 20,000 Storm Drains Repairs*** 250,000 35,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 585,000 Safe Rte 2 Schools Program (City)*** 25,000 25,000 TOTAL 275,000 55,000 50,000
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 630,000 *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual projects for details. Flood Control fees are collected from builders
or developers for the purpose of defraying the cost of constructing drainage facilities within the vicinity of the new building or development. Flood Control Fees may be used used only
for the construction of local drainage facilities. 2-29
Funding Source: Traffic Mitigation Fees (Fund 233) Six-Year Cashflow Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14
FY 14/15 1 Balance 1,883,532 1,340,886 1,690,171 2,184,641 2,282,074 707,382 386,065 2 Baseline Revenues 437,354 1,099,285 494,470 472,433 425,308 428,683 433,183 Traffic Mitigation
Fees (Residential) 23,700 5,625 5,625 15,750 19,125 22,500 27,000 Traffic Mitigation Fees (Commercial) 380,352 1,062,477 457,662 425,500 375,000 375,000 375,000 Investment Earnings 33,302
31,183 31,183 31,183 31,183 31,183 31,183 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 437,354 1,099,285 494,470 472,433 425,308 428,683 433,183 5 Baseline Expenditures 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 980,000 750,000 0 375,000 2,000,000 750,000 750,000 9 Total Expenditures
( 7 + 8 ) 980,000 750,000 0 375,000 2,000,000 750,000 750,000 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) (542,646) 349,285 494,470 97,433 (1,574,692) (321,317)
(316,817) 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 1,340,886 1,690,171 2,184,641 2,282,074 707,382 386,065 69,248 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 1,340,886 1,690,171
2,184,641 2,282,074 707,382 386,065 69,248 Prior Year Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY11/12
FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total Alignment Studies 400,000 200,000 600,000 Leucadia Blvd Imp (I-5 to Vulcan) *** 2,000,000 2,000,000 Santa Fe Drive (I-5 to MacKinnon) 200,000 750,000
750,000 1,700,000 La Costa Avenue Widening (Design) 375,000 3,625,000 4,000,000 Imprv to Leuc/N.Hwy101/Vulcan Intersection*** 250,000 750,000 1,000,000 I-5 Interchange @Encinitas Blvd.
1,000,000 330,000 1,330,000 Traffic Safety & Calming *** Ongoing N/A TOTAL 1,400,000 980,000 750,000 0 375,000 2,000,000 750,000 750,000 3,625,000 10,630,000 *** Projects with asterisks
have additional funding sources-See individual projects for details. Traffic Mitigation Fees are collected from builders or developers for the purpose of defraying the cost of constructing
street improvements. 2-30
Funding Source: Parkland Acquisition Fees (Fund 234) Six-Year Cashflow Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY
13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance (72,900) (207,380) (147,559) (87,738) 52,083 85,904 59,165 2 Baseline Revenues 215,520 159,821 159,821 439,821 533,821 627,821 751,821 Fees 619,008 156,000 156,000
436,000 530,000 624,000 748,000 Third Quarter Adjustment (415,379) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Investment Earnings 11,891 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 215,520 159,821 159,821 439,821 533,821 627,821 751,821 5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 254,560 100,000 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 100,000 100,000
100,000 100,000 100,000 254,560 100,000 10 Transfers In/Out -Fund 321 250,000 0 0 200,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Total Transfers 250,000 0 0 200,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 11 Current
Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) (134,480) 59,821 59,821 139,821 33,821 (26,739) 251,821 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) (207,380) (147,559) (87,738) 52,083 85,904 59,165 310,986 13 Contingency Reserves
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves (207,380) (147,559) (87,738) 52,083 85,904 59,165 310,986 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project
Appropriation FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total Habitat/Open Space Acquisition*** 521,155 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
700,000 Standard Pacific Park Site Development*** 154,560 154,560 TOTAL 521,155 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 254,560 100,000 854,560 *** Projects with asterisks have additional
funding sources-See individual projects for details. Parkland Acquisition fees fund the purchase or development of Parkland Parkland Acquisition fees are collected from builders or developers
for the purpose of defraying the cost of acquiring recreational facilities in the vicinity of the new building or development. 2-31
Funding Source: Open Space Fund (Fund 235) ` Six-Year Cashflow Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY
14/15 1 Balance 14,897 4,063 4,826 589 199 1,154 3,454 2 Baseline Revenues 14,166 10,763 10,763 29,610 35,955 42,300 50,760 Impact Fees 38,986 10,575 10,575 29,422 35,767 42,112 50,572
Investment Earnings 0 188 188 188 188 188 188 Third Quarter Adjustment (24,820) 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 14,166 10,763 10,763 29,610 35,955 42,300 50,760
5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 25,000 10,000 15,000 30,000 35,000
40,000 50,000 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 25,000 10,000 15,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 50,000 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) (10,834) 763 (4,237)
(390) 955 2,300 760 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 4,063 4,826 589 199 1,154 3,454 4,214 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 4,063 4,826 589 199 1,154 3,454
4,214 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total
Habitat Watershed/Open Space Acquisition*** Ongoing 25,000 10,000 15,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 50,000 Ongoing NA TOTAL 0 25,000 10,000 15,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 50,000 0 NA *** Projects
with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual projects for details. Open Space Impact fees are collected from builders or developers of residential property for the purpose
of defraying the cost of acquiring community assets of open space land. 2-32
Funding Source: Recreation Trail Fees (Fund 236) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14
FY 14/15 1 Balance 3,062 6,680 9,421 12,162 19,722 28,902 39,702 2 Baseline Revenues 3,618 2,741 2,741 7,560 9,180 10,800 12,960 Impact Fees 10,714 2,700 2,700 7,519 9,139 10,759 12,919
Investment Earnings 0 41 41 41 41 41 41 Third Quarter Adjustment (7,096) 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 3,618 2,741 2,741 7,560 9,180 10,800 12,960 5 Baseline
Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8
) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 3,618 2,741 2,741 7,560 9,180 10,800 12,960 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 6,680 9,421 12,162 19,722
28,902 39,702 52,662 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 6,680 9,421 12,162 19,722 28,902 39,702 52,662 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total No current projects TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recreation Trail
Impact Fees are collected from builders or developers of residential property for the purpose of defraying the cost of acquiring land for or developing recreational trails. 2-33
Funding Source: Community Facilities Impact Fees (Fund 237) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Baseline Revenues 19,124 14,275 14,275 39,970 48,535 57,100 68,520 Impact Fees 52,685 14,275 14,275 39,970 48,535 57,100 68,520 Investment
Earnings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Third Quarter Adjustment (33,561) 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 19,124 14,275 14,275 39,970 48,535 57,100 68,520 5 Baseline Expenditures
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Transfers In(Out) to Fund 101 (19,124) (14,275) (14,275) (39,970) (48,535) (57,100) (68,520) 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves (not used) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prior Year Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project
Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total No current project allocations TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Community Facilities Impact Fees are
collected from builders or developers of residential property for the purpose of defraying the cost of community facilities such as the Community Library. 2-34
Funding Source: In Lieu Curb Gutter Sidewalks (Fund 238) Six-Year Cashflow Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 6,189 6,189 6,252 6,315 6,378 6,441 6,504 2 Baseline Revenues 0 63 63 63 63 63 63 Impact Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Investment Earnings 0 63 63 63 63 63 63 3 New
Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 0 63 63 63 63 63 63 5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 0 63 63 63 63 63 63 12
Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 6,189 6,252 6,315 6,378 6,441 6,504 6,567 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 6,189 6,252 6,315 6,378 6,441 6,504 6,567 Prior
Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total No current
projects TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In Lieu Public Improvement fees are collected on certain development projects where it is impractical for the applicant to construct the required public
improvements. It is not currently known how many applications will qualify for the in lieu fee. 2-35
Funding Source: In Lieu Underground Utilities (Fund 239) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 485,454 499,724 504,654 509,584 514,514 519,444 524,374 2 Baseline Revenues 14,270 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 Impact Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Investment
Earnings 14,270 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 14,270 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Transfers
In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 14,270 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 499,724 504,654 509,584 514,514 519,444 524,374 529,304
13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 499,724 504,654 509,584 514,514 519,444 524,374 529,304 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total No current projects TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In Lieu Underground Utilities
fees are collected on certain development projects where it is impractical for the applicant to construct the required public improvements. It is not currently known how many applications
will qualify for the in lieu fee. 2-36
Funding Source: RTCIP (Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program) Fee (Fund 241) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09
FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 0 0 50,001 100,501 241,501 413,901 618,001 2 Baseline Revenues 0 50,501 51,000 142,400 174,100 206,100 258,600 RTCIP Fees
198,400 50,000 50,000 140,000 170000 200,000 250,000 SANDAG Administrative Fee 1,984 500 500 1,400 1,700 2,000 2,500 Investment Earnings 1,000 1 500 1,000 2,400 4,100 6,100 Third Quarter
Adjustment (201,384) 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 0 50,501 51,000 142,400 174,100 206,100 258,600 5 Baseline Expenditures 0 500 500 1,400 1,700 2,000 2,500
6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 500 500 1,400 1,700 2,000 2,500 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 0 500 500
1,400 1,700 2,000 2,500 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 0 50,001 50,500 141,000 172,400 204,100 256,100 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 0 50,001 100,501
241,501 413,901 618,001 874,101 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11
FY11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total No current projects 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual projects for details.
In 2004, voters approved a continuation of the $0.005 sales tax known as TransNet. The TransNet Extension is governed by SANDAG Commission Ordinance 04-01, TransNet Extension Ordinance
and Expenditure Plan. Ordinance 04-01 establishes a Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP), which is intended to ensure that future development will contribute
its share toward funding and mitigating new traffic impacts on the Regional Arterial System. Section 9 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance requires that local jurisdictions establish
a program program or mechanism to exact $2,000 per new residential unit for the purpose of funding the RTCIP. Local jurisdictions must comply with this requirement in order to receive
their fair share of TransNet funding. 2-37
Funding Source: Asset Forfeiture (261), State Special Law Enforcement (COPS) (262) and Federal Special Law Enforcement (263) Six-Year Cashflow Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 99,878 94,878 90,892 86,906 82,920 78,934 74,948 2 Baseline Revenues -Intergovernmental/Grants
50,916 179,126 101,014 101,014 101,014 101,014 101,014 Asset Forfeiture Fund (261) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Law Enforcement Fund (262) 50,916 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Federal Law Enforcement Fund (263) 0 78,112 0 0 0 0 0 Interest Earnings (261) 1,014 1,014 1,014 1,014 1,014 1,014 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 50,916 179,126
101,014 101,014 101,014 101,014 101,014 5 Baseline Expenditures 55,916 183,112 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 Contracts & Services Asset Forfeiture Fund (261) 5,000 5,000 5,000
5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 State Law Enforcement Fund (262) 50,916 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Federal Law Enforcement Fund (263) 0 78,112 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 55,916 183,112 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 55,916 183,112
105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) (5,000) (3,986) (3,986) (3,986) (3,986) (3,986) (3,986) 12 Ending Fund Balance
(1+11) 94,878 90,892 86,906 82,920 78,934 74,948 70,962 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 94,878 90,892 86,906 82,920 78,934 74,948 70,962 Asset Forfeiture
represents resources obtained through legal asset seizures by law enforcement officials in Encinitas. Funds are used to acquire additional non-personnel expense items to aid in law enforcement
activities. The State established the Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund to supplement law enforcement services. The Federal government created a similar Fund. There are no capital improvement
projects associated with these grant funds. 2-38
Funding Source: Fire Mitigation Fees (Fund 272) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14
FY 14/15 1 Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Baseline Revenues 99,600 35,732 39,892 69,410 82,419 95,428 112,773 Fees -Residential 72,168 15,714 15,714 41,904 50,634 59,364 71,004 Fees -Commercial
27,432 20,018 24,178 27,506 31,785 36,064 41,769 Investment Earnings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 99,600 35,732 39,892 69,410 82,419 95,428 112,773
5 Baseline Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures
( 7 + 8 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Transfers to Fund 119 (for Fire Stations) 99,600 35,732 39,892 69,410 82,419 95,428 112,773 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Ending Fund Balance
(1+11) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project
Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total No current projects TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding
sources-See individual projects for details. Fire Mitigation fees are collected from builders or developers for the purpose of defraying the cost of constructing improvements necessary
to maintain established service levels. 2-39
Funding Source: Village Park (Fund 290) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15
1 Balance 144,400 138,887 133,512 128,134 121,924 114,860 106,923 2 Baseline Revenues 36,177 31,357 31,357 31,357 31,357 31,357 31,357 Property Tax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Assessments 32,610 29,813
29,813 29,813 29,813 29,813 29,813 Investment Earnings 3,567 1,544 1,544 1,544 1,544 1,544 1,544 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 36,177 31,357 31,357 31,357 31,357 31,357 31,357 5 Baseline Expenditures 41,690 36,732 36,735 37,567 38,420 39,294 40,189 Personnel 3,032 3,139 3,253 3,383
3,518 3,659 3,806 Materials & Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contracts & Services 36,445 31,520 31,305 31,931 32,570 33,221 33,886 Internal Cost Allocation 2,213 2,073 2,177 2,253 2,332 2,414
2,498 Fixed Assets/Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 41,690 36,732 36,735 37,567 38,420 39,294 40,189 8 CIP's/Work
Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 41,690 36,732 36,735 37,567 38,420 39,294 40,189 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) (5,513) (5,375)
(5,378) (6,210) (7,063) (7,937) (8,832) 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 138,887 133,512 128,134 121,924 114,860 106,923 98,091 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves
138,887 133,512 128,134 121,924 114,860 106,923 98,091 The purpose of the Municipal Improvement Districts funds is to provide for improvements and ongoing maintenance of landscaped median
islands and roadside landscaping in specific areas. 2-40
Funding Source: Villanitas (Fund 291) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15
1 Balance 204,944 214,942 221,209 226,740 232,107 237,306 242,332 2 Baseline Revenues 26,207 22,807 22,525 22,741 22,961 23,186 23,415 Property Tax 11,371 10,587 10,799 11,015 11,235
11,460 11,689 Assessments 10,080 10,080 9,586 9,586 9,586 9,586 9,586 Investment Earnings 4,756 2,140 2,140 2,140 2,140 2,140 2,140 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2
+ 3 ) 26,207 22,807 22,525 22,741 22,961 23,186 23,415 5 Baseline Expenditures 16,209 16,540 16,994 17,373 17,762 18,160 18,567 Personnel 1,011 1,047 1,084 1,127 1,172 1,219 1,268 Materials
& Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contracts & Services 14,049 14,355 14,715 15,009 15,309 15,616 15,928 Internal Cost Allocation 1,149 1,138 1,195 1,237 1,280 1,325 1,371 Fixed Assets/Debt Service
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 16,209 16,540 16,994 17,373 17,762 18,160 18,567 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures
( 7 + 8 ) 16,209 16,540 16,994 17,373 17,762 18,160 18,567 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 9,998 6,267 5,531 5,367 5,199 5,026 4,847 12 Ending Fund
Balance (1+11) 214,942 221,209 226,740 232,107 237,306 242,332 247,179 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 214,942 221,209 226,740 232,107 237,306 242,332
247,179 The purpose of the Municipal Improvement Districts funds is to provide for improvements and on going maintenance of landscaped median islands and roadside landscaping in specific
areas. 2-41
Funding Source: Cerro Street (Fund 292) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15
1 Balance 180,610 200,324 209,321 218,851 229,189 240,380 252,468 2 Baseline Revenues 47,214 39,189 40,573 42,072 43,632 45,254 46,940 Property Tax 41,748 36,045 37,487 38,986 40,546
42,168 43,854 Assessments 1,185 1,185 1,127 1,127 1,127 1,127 1,127 Investment Earnings 4,281 1,959 1,959 1,959 1,959 1,959 1,959 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 +
3 ) 47,214 39,189 40,573 42,072 43,632 45,254 46,940 5 Baseline Expenditures 27,500 30,192 31,043 31,734 32,441 33,165 33,907 Personnel 2,023 2,092 2,168 2,255 2,345 2,439 2,536 Materials
& Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contracts & Services 23,818 26,410 27,100 27,642 28,195 28,759 29,334 Internal Cost Allocation 1,659 1,690 1,775 1,837 1,901 1,968 2,037 Fixed Assets/Debt Service
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 27,500 30,192 31,043 31,734 32,441 33,165 33,907 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures
( 7 + 8 ) 27,500 30,192 31,043 31,734 32,441 33,165 33,907 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 19,714 8,997 9,530 10,338 11,191 12,088 13,033 12 Ending
Fund Balance (1+11) 200,324 209,321 218,851 229,189 240,380 252,468 265,501 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 200,324 209,321 218,851 229,189 240,380 252,468
265,501 The purpose of the Municipal Improvement Districts funds is to provide for improvements and on-going maintenance of landscaped median islands and roadside landscaping in specific
areas. 2-42
Fund Source: Encinitas Lighting and Landscape District -Citywide (Fund 295) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11
FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 444,406 373,076 236,253 95,979 98,927 98,927 98,927 2 Baseline Revenues 1,170,781 1,153,814 1,167,810 1,288,747 1,314,188 1,314,470 1,344,261
Property Tax 659,777 646,138 659,061 672,242 685,687 699,401 713,389 Assessments 478,992 477,919 478,992 478,992 478,992 478,992 478,992 Required Additional Revenue 0 0 0 107,756 119,752
106,320 122,123 Investment Earnings 9,512 5,257 5,257 5,257 5,257 5,257 5,257 Property Rental 22,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues
( 2 + 3 ) 1,170,781 1,153,814 1,167,810 1,288,747 1,314,188 1,314,470 1,344,261 5 Baseline Expenditures 1,242,111 1,211,837 1,229,284 1,256,999 1,285,388 1,314,469 1,344,261 Personnel
90,097 98,903 102,463 106,562 110,824 115,257 119,867 Materials & Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contracts & Services 1,089,899 1,044,395 1,054,825 1,075,922 1,097,440 1,119,389 1,141,777 Internal
Cost Allocation 62,115 68,539 71,996 74,516 77,124 79,823 82,617 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 1,242,111 1,211,837 1,229,284 1,256,999 1,285,388
1,314,469 1,344,261 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 78,800 78,800 28,800 28,800 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 1,242,111 1,290,637 1,308,084 1,285,799 1,314,188 1,314,469 1,344,261 10 Transfers
In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) (71,330) (136,823) (140,274) 2,948 (0) 1 (0) 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 373,076 236,253 95,979 98,927 98,927 98,927 98,927 13
Contingency Reserves 0 29,200 29,200 29,200 29,200 29,200 29,200 14 Future Project Reserves 373,076 207,053 66,779 69,727 69,727 69,727 69,727 CIP's/Work Projects Prior Year Approved
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total Prop 218 50,000 50,000 50,000
100,000 Traffic Signals Red and Green LED Light Replacement 28,800 28,800 28,800 28,800 115,200 TOTAL 0 0 78,800 78,800 28,800 28,800 0 0 0 215,200 *** Projects with asterisks have additional
funding sources-See individual projects for details. The following is for maintenance and improvement of the Encinitas Lighting and Landscape District, a subsidiary district of the City.
Revenues are derived through a combination of property tax apportionment and benefit assessments. 2-43
Funding Source: Wiro Park (Fund 296) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance
8,862 5,836 6,751 7,402 7,807 7,960 7,852 2 Baseline Revenues 11,239 11,081 11,081 11,081 11,081 11,081 11,081 Property Tax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Assessments 11,001 11,001 11,001 11,001 11,001
11,001 11,001 Investment Earnings 238 80 80 80 80 80 80 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 11,239 11,081
11,081 11,081 11,081 11,081 11,081 5 Baseline Expenditures 14,265 10,166 10,430 10,676 10,929 11,188 11,454 Personnel 971 1,045 1,083 1,126 1,171 1,218 1,267 Materials & Supplies 0 0
0 0 1 2 3 Contracts & Services 12,176 8,142 8,319 8,485 8,655 8,828 9,005 Internal Cost Allocation 1,118 979 1,028 1,064 1,101 1,140 1,180 Fixed Assets/Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New
Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 14,265 10,166 10,430 10,676 10,929 11,188 11,454 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 )
14,265 10,166 10,430 10,676 10,929 11,188 11,454 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) (3,026) 915 651 405 152 (107) (373) 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11)
5,836 6,751 7,402 7,807 7,960 7,852 7,479 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 5,836 6,751 7,402 7,807 7,960 7,852 7,479 The purpose of the Municipal Improvement
Districts and Assessment Districts' funds is to provide for improvements and on-going maintenance of landscaped median islands and roadside landscaping. 2-44
Fund Source: Encinitas Ranch Zone H Fund (297) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY
14/15 1 Balance 626,629 723,940 839,589 942,023 1,031,705 1,108,330 1,171,582 2 Baseline Revenues 675,644 673,620 673,620 673,620 673,620 673,620 673,620 Property Tax 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Assessments
666,132 666,090 666,090 666,090 666,090 666,090 666,090 Investment Earnings 9,512 7,530 7,530 7,530 7,530 7,530 7,530 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 675,644
673,620 673,620 673,620 673,620 673,620 673,620 5 Baseline Expenditures 578,333 557,971 571,186 583,938 596,996 610,367 624,061 Personnel 52,417 42,289 43,809 45,561 47,384 49,279 51,250
Materials & Supplies 27,250 23,800 23,800 24,276 24,762 25,257 25,762 Contracts & Services 466,831 463,190 473,450 482,919 492,577 502,429 512,478 Internal Cost Allocation 26,835 28,692
30,127 31,181 32,273 33,402 34,571 Capital Outlay 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contracts & Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 578,333
557,971 571,186 583,938 596,996 610,367 624,061 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 578,333 557,971 571,186 583,938 596,996 610,367 624,061 10 Transfers
In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 97,311 115,649 102,434 89,682 76,624 63,253 49,559 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 723,940 839,589 942,023 1,031,705 1,108,330 1,171,582
1,221,141 13 Contingency Reserves 0 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 14 Undesignated Reserves 723,940 832,889 935,323 1,025,005 1,101,630 1,164,882 1,214,441 Prior Year Approved Proposed
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total No Current Projects TOTAL 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 Assessment for this fund increased from $40 to $70 during the FY2005-06 budget cycle; and to $100 during the FY2006-07 cycle. ELLD Zone H was established to accurately track
track and assess the costs associated with the localized street lighting and landscaping improvements associated with the Encinitas Ranch Specific Plan Area including Leo Mullen Sports
Park. 2-45
Funding Source: Encinitas Public Financing Authority -Debt Service (Fund 321) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11
FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Baseline Revenues 156,000 78,000 78,000 78,000 78,000 78,000 78,000 Trustee Investment Earnings 156,000 78,000 78,000 78,000
78,000 78,000 78,000 3 Reimbursements 166,300 166,400 160,400 95,600 96,900 0 0 San Dieguito Water District 96,300 97,500 94,100 95,600 96,900 0 0 Encinitas Sanitary Division 70,000
68,900 66,300 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 322,300 244,400 238,400 173,600 174,900 78,000 78,000 5a Capital Lease Payments 337,923 337,038 337,038 389,279 332,672 332,672 293,557
114,366 114,366 114,366 166,607 110,000 110,000 110,000 NPDES VacCon 40,000 39,115 39,115 39,115 39,115 39,115 0 Civic Center Roof Project 183,557 183,557 183,557 183,557 183,557 183,557
183,557 5b Bonded Debt Payments 4,120,720 3,941,285 3,889,831 3,879,918 3,704,373 3,604,529 3,606,294 802,735 335,900 279,600 274,100 96,800 0 0 296,635 303,135 299,235 300,035 294,935
298,798 Civic Center Bonds (CC Improv-152) 604,883 605,868 600,771 604,228 606,133 601,625 600,750 1,513,166 1,507,166 1,510,279 1,506,519 1,506,319 1,509,263 1,510,050 1,199,936 1,195,716
1,196,046 1,195,836 1,195,086 1,198,706 1,196,696 6 Administration Fees 11,000 9,987 6,987 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 7 Total Expenditures ( 5+6 ) 4,469,643 4,288,310 4,233,856 4,278,297
4,046,145 3,946,301 3,908,951 8 Transfer to the Debt Service Fund: 4,147,343 4,043,910 3,995,456 4,104,697 3,871,245 3,868,301 3,830,951 From the General Fund (101) 2,971,436 3,141,407
3,091,550 3,001,234 2,565,077 2,571,741 2,531,403 From Civic Center Imp Fund (152) 925,907 902,503 903,906 903,463 906,168 896,560 899,548 From Park Acq Fund (234) 250,000 0 0 200,000
400,000 400,000 400,000 9 Ending Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Library Bonds (General Fund-101) Fire Truck Leases (General Fund-101) ABAG Bonds (General Fund-101) Hall Property Bonds (General
Fund-101) ABAG Bonds (CC Improv-152) The Encinitas Public Financing Authority (EPFA) was originally created as a financing entity for the City Hall site acquisition and improvements.
It continues to function as the City's debt service payment and administration fund for all governmental debt issues. Since the debt service reserve funds held by the Bond Trustees earn
interest, this has defrayed some of the annual debt service payments. 2-46
Funding Source: Cardiff Sanitary Division Operating (501), Replacement (502), Expansion (503), Debt Service (504), Rate Stabilization (506) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 8,925,894 10,089,810 10,774,953 10,673,881 9,509,328 8,953,821 8,401,151
2 Baseline Revenues 5,316,222 5,063,112 4,792,740 5,564,851 5,830,549 6,109,531 6,402,462 Charges for Services/Assessments 4,888,506 4,778,034 4,541,832 4,632,669 5,579,641 5,858,623
6,151,554 Assumed Rate Increase 681,275 Investment Earnings 313,913 155,850 155,850 155,850 155,850 155,850 155,850 Connection Fees 100,000 85,425 51,255 51,255 51,255 51,255 51,255
All Other 13,803 43,803 43,803 43,803 43,803 43,803 43,803 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 5,316,222 5,063,112 4,792,740 5,564,851 5,830,549 6,109,531 6,402,462
5 Operating Expenditures 2,435,907 2,578,966 2,769,892 2,904,386 3,045,498 3,193,554 3,348,898 Personnel 7,044 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Materials & Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Contracts & Services 2,290,578 2,365,841 2,547,050 2,674,403 2,808,123 2,948,529 3,095,955 Internal Cost Allocation 124,485 194,325 204,042 211,183 218,575 226,225 234,143 Operating
leases 13,800 13,800 13,800 13,800 13,800 13,800 13,800 6 Debt Service: Bonded Debt Service 747,200 741,800 743,800 743,800 743,800 743,800 743,800 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 3,183,107
3,320,766 3,513,692 3,648,186 3,789,298 3,937,354 4,092,698 8 CIP's/Work Projects 969,199 1,057,203 1,380,120 3,081,218 2,596,759 2,724,846 1,653,363 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 4,152,306
4,377,969 4,893,812 6,729,404 6,386,057 6,662,200 5,746,061 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 1,163,916 685,143 (101,072) (1,164,553) (555,508) (552,669)
656,401 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 10,089,810 10,774,953 10,673,881 9,509,328 8,953,821 8,401,151 9,057,552 13a Operating Cash Flow Reserves 608,977 644,742 692,473 726,096 761,374
798,388 837,225 13b Capital Reserves 7,069,692 8,902,100 8,753,296 7,555,120 6,964,334 6,374,651 6,992,216 13c Rate Stabilization Reserves (12-13a-13b) 1,199,643 1,228,112 1,228,112
1,228,112 1,228,112 1,228,112 1,228,112 14 Total Reserves (13a+13b+13c) 8,878,312 10,774,953 10,673,881 9,509,328 8,953,821 8,401,151 9,057,552 Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY15 Total CSD Share of CIP's @San Elijo (CCE10A) 37,199
323,471 388,698 892,875 1,550,031 796,325 852,395 1,083,355 Ongoing NA Cardiff Pump Station Generator (SEJPA) 304,000 130,000 434,000 CSD Master Plan Implementation Ongoing 515,728 668,505
487,245 1,531,187 1,800,434 1,872,451 570,008 Ongoing NA TOTAL 341,199 969,199 1,057,203 1,380,120 3,081,218 2,596,759 2,724,846 1,653,363 0 434,000 The projects that are financed with
operating or replacement funds are for improvements to or replacement of existing facilities. Expansion funds are used to finance improvements which expand the capacity of the sewer
collection and treatment systems and are derived from connection fees. 2-47
Funding Source: Encinitas Sanitary Division Operating Fund (521), Replacement (522), Expansion (523), and Rate Stabilization (525) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed
Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 3,396,387 3,907,831 4,625,623 5,364,774 5,861,671 6,421,633 6,946,305 2 Baseline Revenues
2,732,824 2,911,841 3,109,538 2,930,775 3,009,103 3,079,930 3,168,332 Charges for Services/Assessments 2,519,405 2,758,248 2,696,682
2,777,582 2,860,910 2,946,737 3,035,139 Investment Earnings 128,419 73,193 73,193 73,193 73,193 73,193 73,193 Connection Fees 85,000 80,400 339,663 80,000 75,000 60,000 60,000 3 New
Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 2,732,824 2,911,841 3,109,538 2,930,775 3,009,103 3,079,930 3,168,332 5 Baseline Expenditures 1,237,283 1,324,177 1,394,216 1,461,483
1,532,039 1,606,048 1,683,680 Personnel 4,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contracts & Services 1,154,777 1,207,788 1,272,008 1,335,608 1,402,389 1,472,508 1,546,134 1,546,134 Internal Cost Allocation
78,506 116,389 122,208 125,874 129,650 133,540 137,546 6 Debt Service 84,003 82,703 80,103 81,029 81,029 81,029 81,029 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 1,321,286 1,406,880 1,474,319 1,542,512
1,613,068 1,687,077 1,764,709 8 CIP's/Work Projects 900,094 787,169 896,068 891,367 836,072 868,181 901,571 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 2,221,380 2,194,049 2,370,387 2,433,879 2,449,140
2,555,258 2,666,280 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 511,444 717,792 739,151 496,897 559,963 524,672 502,052 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 3,907,831
4,625,623 5,364,774 5,861,671 6,421,633 6,946,305 7,448,357 13a Operating Cash Flow Reserves 309,321 351,720 368,580 385,628 403,267 421,769 441,177 13b Capital Reserves 2,704,717 3,380,110
4,102,401 4,582,250 5,124,573 5,630,743 6,113,387 13c Rate Stabilization Reserves 893,793 893,793 893,793 893,793 893,793 893,793 893,793 14 Total Reserves (13a+13b+13c) 3,907,831 4,625,623
5,364,774 5,861,671 6,421,633 6,946,305 7,448,357 Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proprosed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project FY08/09 FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15
FY15 Total Moonlight Beach PS Rehabilitation 2,925 NA Encina Phase V 352,000 270,000 NA ESD Share of CIP's at Encina Ongoing 49,352 193,517 286,106 264,607 192,009 200,356 209,033 Ongoing
NA ESD Master Plan Implementation 2,170,621 527,817 543,652 559,962 576,760 594,063 617,826 642,539 Ongoing NA ESD Share of Batiquitos Pump Station Ongoing 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
50,000 50,000 50,000 Ongoing NA TOTAL 2,522,621 900,094 787,169 896,068 891,367 836,072 868,181 901,571 0 0 *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual
projects for details. In 1995, the District was merged with the City and previous district funds are now contained in a separate City sanitary division. The projects that are financed
with operating or replacement funds are for improvements to or replacement of existing facilities. Expansion funds are used to finance improvements which expand the capacity of the sewer
collection and treatment systems and are derived from connection fees. 2-48
Funding Source: San Dieguito Water District Operating Fund (531), Expansion (533), Replacement (534), Rate Stabilization (535), Debt Service (536) and Recycled Water Six-Year Cashflow
Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 1 Balance 9,800,456 9,646,236 9,128,069 9,648,503 10,465,080
11,624,231 13,071,793 2 Baseline Revenues 12,052,824 13,128,423 16,332,454 16,904,988 18,049,346 19,105,451 20,476,383 Recycled Water Sales 495,857 650,000 660,000 670,000 680,000 690,000
700,000 3 New Revenues (Not Used) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 12,548,681 13,778,423 16,992,454 17,574,988 18,729,346 19,795,451 21,176,383 5 Operating Expenditures: 9,767,496
10,695,630 12,228,085 13,084,051 13,999,935 14,979,930 16,028,525 6 Debt Service: 1,820,405 1,760,960 1,754,935 1,759,360 1,755,260 1,652,960 1,658,868 Repayment of City Advances 94,200
97,500 94,100 95,600 96,900 0 0 Bonded Debt Service & Fees 1,726,205 1,663,460 1,660,835 1,663,760 1,658,360 1,652,960 1,658,868 7 Subtotal Expenditures (3 + 4) 11,587,901 12,456,590
13,983,020 14,843,411 15,755,195 16,632,890 17,687,393 8 CIP's/Work Projects 1,115,000 1,840,000 2,489,000 1,915,000 1,815,000 1,715,000 1,815,000 9 Total Expenditures ( 5 + 6 ) 12,702,901
14,296,590 16,472,020 16,758,411 17,570,195 18,347,890 19,502,393 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 2 -7) (154,220) (518,167) 520,434 816,577 1,159,152 1,447,561
1,673,990 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+8) 9,646,236 9,128,069 9,648,503 10,465,080 11,624,231 13,071,793 14,745,783 13 Operating Cash Flow Reserves (Fund 531) 1,036,904 1,350,765 1,758,542
1,869,494 1,951,291 2,042,750 2,148,071 13a Capital Replacement Reserves (Fund 534) 6,003,930 6,059,640 6,076,133 6,680,191 7,650,573 8,893,145 10,342,188 13b Rate Stabilization Reserves
(Fund 535) 2,605,402 1,717,664 1,813,828 1,915,395 2,022,367 2,135,898 2,255,524 14 Total Reserves (13+13a+13b) 9,646,236 9,128,069 9,648,503 10,465,080 11,624,231 13,071,793 14,745,783
Projects (see #8) Prior Year Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond Project Appropriations FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15
FY15 Total Arroyo Drive Pressure Reducing Station 50,000 50,000 Badger Misc. Plant Improvements Ongoing 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Ongoing NA Drought Allocation
Study 75,000 75,000 Fire Hydrant Installation 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 300,000 Instrumentation, Telemetry & Control System 650,000 100,000 750,000 Transmission Lines Motorized Actuators
100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Water Distributions Line Upgrades Ongoing 250,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Ongoing NA Water Master Plan 150,000
60,000 210,000 Water Valve Replacements Ongoing 100,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Ongoing NA Water Rate Study Update (NEW) 75,000 100,000 100,000 275,000 Meter
Replacement and Automation (II) Ongoing 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Ongoing NA Badger Master Plan Projects Ongoing 250,000 550,000 1,450,000 975,000 975,000
975,000 975,000 Ongoing NA Badger Master Plan 124,000 124,000 Anode Bed Replacement 165,000 165,000 TOTAL 825,000 1,115,000 1,840,000 2,489,000 1,915,000 1,815,000 1,715,000 1,815,000
0 2,449,000 *** Projects with asterisks have additional funding sources-See individual projects for details. The projects that are financed with operating or replacement funds are for
improvements to or replacement of existing facilities. Expansion funds are used to finance improvements that expand the capacity of the water distribution system and are derived from
development impact fees. 2-49
Funding Source: Pacific Pines Fund (561) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15
1 Balance 307,691 348,762 372,522 394,362 414,311 432,300 448,272 2 Baseline Revenues 237,134 223,323 223,323 223,323 223,323 223,323 223,323 Property Rental 98,000 120,000 120,000 120,000
120,000 120,000 120,000 Federal Housing Subsidy 132,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Investment Earnings 7,134 3,323 3,323 3,323 3,323 3,323 3,323 3 New Revenues 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 237,134 223,323 223,323 223,323 223,323 223,323 223,323 5 Baseline Expenditures 196,063 199,563 201,483 203,374 205,334 207,351 209,430 Personnel
3,668 6,119 6,339 6,565 6,799 7,039 7,287 Materials & Supplies 4,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Contracts & Services 83,129 80,413 81,851 83,332 84,858 86,429 88,047 Internal
Cost Allocation 0 5,235 5,497 5,689 5,889 6,095 6,308 Fixed Assets/Debt Service 105,266 105,296 105,296 105,288 105,288 105,288 105,288 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal
Expenditures (5 + 6) 196,063 199,563 201,483 203,374 205,334 207,351 209,430 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 196,063 199,563 201,483 203,374 205,334
207,351 209,430 10 Transfers In -Section 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 41,071 23,760 21,840 19,949 17,989 15,972 13,893 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 348,762 372,522
394,362 414,311 432,300 448,272 462,166 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 348,762 372,522 394,362 414,311 432,300 448,272 462,166 . The Housing Authority
owns and operates 16 condominium units at Pacific Pines Condominium on S. El Camino Real. The units have projectbased rental assistance vouchers and the tenants are drawn from the Section
8 program waiting list. The City contracts with a local property management firm to manage the units. 2-50
Funding Source: District Services Fund (616) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY
14/15 1 Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Baseline Revenues 842,737 854,311 962,412 992,202 1,022,933 1,054,635 1,087,339 Charges for Services/Assessments 743,023 763,621 791,722 843,956 880,136
880,136 880,136 Rental Charges 99,714 90,690 170,690 148,246 142,797 174,499 207,203 Other Agency Revenue/Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 842,737 854,311 962,412 992,202 1,022,933 1,054,635 1,087,339 5 Baseline Expenditures 842,737 854,311 962,412 992,202
1,022,933 1,054,635 1,087,339 Personnel 683,067 712,025 739,670 761,860 784,716 808,257 832,505 Materials & Supplies 37,700 32,665 32,165 32,808 33,464 34,134 34,817 Contracts & Services
57,009 52,684 53,640 55,249 56,907 58,614 60,372 Internal Cost Allocation Expense 61,714 53,690 133,690 139,038 144,599 150,383 156,398 Fixed Assets/Debt Service 3,247 3,247 3,247 3,247
3,247 3,247 3,247 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 842,737 854,311 962,412 992,202 1,022,933 1,054,635 1,087,339 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 842,737 854,311 962,412 992,202 1,022,933 1,054,635 1,087,339 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The purpose of the District Service Fund is to account for operational
costs related to Wastewater Operations. The expenditures are allocated to CSD (501) and ESD (521) based on Wastewater efforts and benefits. 2-51
Funding Source: Fleet Maintenance Fund (692) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15
1 Balance 0 0 0 0 0 (0) 0 2 Baseline Revenues 536,402 452,439 473,800 489,590 505,948 522,896 540,457 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 536,402 452,439 473,800 489,590 505,948
522,896 540,457 3 New Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 536,402 452,439 473,800 489,590 505,948 522,896 540,457
5 Baseline Expenditures 536,402 452,439 473,800 489,590 505,948 522,896 540,457 Personnel 288,642 301,083 315,699 328,327 341,460 355,118 369,323 Materials & Supplies 54,570 77,480 80,025
81,626 83,258 84,923 86,622 Contracts & Services 45,576 73,876 78,076 79,638 81,230 82,855 84,512 Internal Cost Allocation 140,614 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fixed Assets/Debt Service 7,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 6 New Program Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 536,402 452,439 473,800 489,590 505,948 522,896 540,457 8 CIP's/Work Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures
( 7 + 8 ) 536,402 452,439 473,800 489,590 505,948 522,896 540,457 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) 0 0 0 0 (0) (0) 0 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 0
0 0 0 (0) 0 0 13 Contingency Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Future Project Reserves 0 0 0 0 (0) 0 0 The purpose of the Internal Service Funds is to account for operational costs related to
Citywide and District expenditures related to vehicle maintenance. There are no capital improvement projects associated with these funds. 2-52
Funding Source: Vehicle Replacement Fund (693) Six-Year Cashflow Approved Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14
FY 14/15 1 Balance 1,711,243 1,669,842 1,008,670 830,253 855,253 880,253 905,253 2 Baseline Revenues 458,599 248,886 375,583 275,000 275,000 275,000 275,000 Vehicle Replacement (All
Funds) 287,927 146,153 154,584 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Equipment Replacement (All Funds) 0 77,733 195,999 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Fire Apparatus (General Fund) 110,000
0 0 0 0 0 0 Interest Income 35,672 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sale/Trade of Vehicle 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 New Revenues 0 0 630,000 0 300,000
0 0 Proceeds of Leases 0 0 630,000 0 300,000 0 0 4 Total Revenues ( 2 + 3 ) 458,599 248,886 1,005,583 275,000 575,000 275,000 275,000 5 Baseline Expenditures 500,000 910,058 1,184,000
250,000 550,000 250,000 250,000 Estimate future year 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Replace Vehicles 0 310,058 334,000 334,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Replace Equipment 0 600,000 0 100,000
100,000 100,000 100,000 Replace Fire Apparatus 0 0 850,000 0 300,000 0 0 6 (Not used) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Subtotal Expenditures (5 + 6) 500,000 910,058 1,184,000 250,000 550,000 250,000
250,000 8 CIP's/Work Projects ( not used) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Total Expenditures ( 7 + 8 ) 500,000 910,058 1,184,000 250,000 550,000 250,000 250,000 10 Transfers In (Out) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
Current Year Net ( 4-9+10 ) (41,401) (661,172) (178,417) 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 12 Ending Fund Balance (1+11) 1,669,842 1,008,670 830,253 855,253 880,253 905,253 930,253 13 Contingency
Reserves (not used) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Replacement Reserves 1,669,842 1,008,670 830,253 855,253 880,253 905,253 930,253 The purpose of the Vehicle Replacement Fund is to collect annual
charges from various City and District funds that utilize vehicles and equipment, and to purchase and own the Fleet. There are no capital improvement projects associated with this fund.
2-53
This page is intentionally left blank. 2-54
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Page Prior Beyond Project No. Project Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total 3-2 Facade Improvement
Incentive Program (WMC97F) 150,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 165,000 3-3 Green Building Incentive Program (WMF10A) 10,000 10,000 20,000 3-4 Lagoon Monitoring (WMB08A) 2,665,394 80,000 80,000
80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 3,145,394 3-5 Comprehensive General Plan Update (WMC09A) 471,658 753,342 125,000 1,350,000 3-6 Finance Studies (Fees and Liabilities) (WMC10B) 60,000 60,000
60,000 180,000 3-7 SANDAG-Regional Beach Sand Project II (WMB08B) 253,911 187,411 187,411 628,733 3-8 Sand Compatibility Opportunitic Use Program (SCOUP)(WMB08C) 212,201 17,180 40,000
25,000 294,381 3-9 Citywide Flood and Channel Maintenance Permitting Program (WMD09D) 41,000 110,000 151,000 3-10 Citywide Landscape and Lighting District Prop 218 Ballot (WMC10C) 50,000
50,000 100,000 3-11 Traffic Signals Red and Green LED Light Replacement (WMC10D) 28,800 28,000 28,000 28,800 28,000 115,200 3-12 SDWD Rate Study Update (CWW10J) 75,000 100,000 100,000
275,000 3-13 SDWD Drought Allocation Study (CWW10M) 75,000 75,000 3-14 SDWD Master Plan Update (CWW09H) 150,000 60,000 210,000 IT Studies/Work Projects 3-15 Digital Topography/GIS Basemap
Updates and Enhancements (WMC01A) 384,100 82,500 30,000 30,000 526,600 3-16 H.T.E. Replacement (WMC09C) 527,751 333,000 334,000 1,194,751 3-17 Technology Replacement Project (WMC10A)
144,500 150,000 207,000 216,000 95,000 205,000 1,017,500 Project Total 4,856,015 2,066,733 1,010,211 530,800 329,800 265,000 390,000 9,448,559 Prior Beyond Funding Project Funding Sources
Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund 1,734,509 1,573,342 704,000 377,000 301,000 265,000 290,000 5,244,851 SDWD Replacement Fund 150,000 210,000
100,000 100,000 560,000 Coastal Zone Management Fund 466,112 204,591 227,411 25,000 923,114 Encinitas Lighting & Landscape District Fund 0 78,800 78,800 28,800 28,800 215,200 Other Agencies
(150) 2,505,394 2,505,394 Project Total 4,856,015 2,066,733 1,010,211 530,800 329,800 265,000 390,000 9,448,559 *Please note that this is not a comprehensive list of all consultant contracts.
This list includes non-recurring consultant contracts over $10,000 that are not associated with any other capital project. Ongoing contractual services are programmed in the Department
Operating Budgets. 3-1
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 5 Years 5 Years Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total
Other (Incentive Payments) 150,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 165,000 Project Cost: 150,000 0 5,000 0 5,000 0 5,000 165,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond
Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund 150,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 165,000 Project Cost: 150,000 0 5,000 0 5,000 0 5,000
165,000 Project Title: Façade Improvement Incentive Program Project Description: Facade Grant Program creates an incentive for business and property owners to conduct physical and aesthetic
exterior improvements to Coast Highway 101 corridor commercial buildings. Initiated in FY 1996/97, the downtown program is administered by DEMA and the North Coast Hwy 101 program administered
by Leucadia Hwy 101 Main Street Association. Anticipate expansion of the program to to Cardiff area upon completion of the Cardiff Specific Plan. Incentives offer up to $1,000 for design
and $2,000 for construction. Project Justification: This Program is consistent with adopted Downtown and North Highway 101 Specific Plans and has become popular with increased utilization.
Anticipated Environmental Review: Categorically Exempt Article 19, Section 15301 Project Number: WMC97F Department/District: City Manager/Planning & Building Location: Coast Highway
101 Corridor General Plan Consistency: The objectives of revitalization for the commercial area of downtown and North Hwy 101 include, "creation of an attractive commercial district"
(L.U. page 70) and that the City will "encourage the rehabilitation and redevelopment of obsolete or commercial development, in ways consistent with community design and development
objectives" (L.U.-1.11). 3-2
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 6 Years Total Other (Incentive Payments)
10,000 10,000 20,000 Project Cost: 0 10,000 10,000 0 0 0 20,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: Minor expenditures from Planning Dept. budget for duplication, education/outreach,
and Build It Green membership SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 6 Years Total General Fund 10,000 10,000 20,000 Project
Cost: 0 10,000 10,000 0 0 0 20,000 Project Title: Green Building Incentive Program Project Description: The Green Building Incentive Program would encourage "green" construction techniques
by providing funds to assist applicants with final certification inspections. Projects that propose and achieve certification through the Build It Green GreenPoint Rated program for
residential projects or the US Green Building Council's LEED program for commercial projects would be provided up to $1,000.00 per application to assist with costs of the respective
program's final certification inspection. Project Justification: The City Council adopted an Environmental Policy on October 8, 2008 that included a requirement to ensure green building
practices in all public and private development. Anticipated Environmental Review: Categorically Exempt Article 19, Section 15308 Project Number: WMF10A Department/District: Planning
& Building Location: Civic Center Roof Solar Panels General Plan Consistency: This program is consistent with and will help to implement General Plan policies for protection of the natural
environment, including but not limited to RM Goal 1 and Policies 1.1, 1.7, and 1.10 (water quality and conservation); RM Goal 5 and related policies (air and water quality); RM Goal
9 and Policy 9.4 (landscaping and irrigation); and RM Goal 15 and related policies (energy conservation). 3-3
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies
2,665,394 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Ongoing 3,145,394 Plan, Design & Engineering Land Purchase Construction Other Project Cost: 2,665,394 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000
80,000 80,000 3,145,394 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total
General Fund 160,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Ongoing 640,000 Other Agency Share for Project (150) 2,505,394 2,505,394 Project Cost: 2,665,394 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000
80,000 80,000 3,145,394 Project Title: Lagoon Monitoring Order No. 2006-076 Project Description: This project is a requirement by the State Water Resource Control Board Order No. 2006-076.
The Lagoon Monitoring Order requires each municipality to collect significant hydrologic, hydraulic and water quality data for the four lagoons in North County. Project Justification:
The State Water Resource Control Board Order No. 2006-076 requires each municipality which conveys urban storm water to the lagoons and adjacent beaches to monitor for sediments, nutrients
and bacteria. The Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) requires states to develop a list of water bodies not meeting water quality standards then develop TMDLs for such waters. The lagoons
are on the 303(d) lists. The purpose of the TMDL is to restore the water body's beneficial uses and attain water quality objectives. Anticipated Environmental Review: N/A Project Number:
WMB08A Department/District: Engineering Department Location: North County Lagoons General Plan Consistency: This project is consistent with Resource Management Element Goal 2 stating
that the City "make every effort to improve ocean water quality." (Coastal Act/30231) (See also RM Policies 2.3,10.6, 10.9, 10.10) 3-4
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Picture here Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total
Anticipated consultant costs $1.2 million; anticipated costs for legal notices, postage, outreach mailers,etc $25,000 each fiscal year; and $100,000 for contingencies. 471,658 753,342
125,000 1,350,000 Project Cost: 471,658 753,342 125,000 0 0 0 0 1,350,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10
FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund 471,658 753,342 125,000 1,350,000 Project Cost: 471,658 753,342 125,000 0 0 0 0 1,350,000 Project Title: Comprehensive
General Plan Update Project Description: Each city and county in California is required to prepare a comprehensive, long-term plan to guide its future. At a minimum, a general plan must
address land use, housing, circulation, open space, conservation, noise and safety. Taken together, these elements are a statement of the community's values and vision for its development.
The purpose of this project is to evaluate whether the General Plan's goals and policies continue to reflect community values and to determine where adjustments may be necessary to respond
to changing needs and priorities. The comprehensive update is anticipated to address new issues such as sustainable communities, healthy communities, climate change, storm water cleansing,
green building; and to strengthen existing policies such as walk ability, environment, economic sustainability, recycling (waste reduction), and circulation. Project Justification: The
Encinitas General Plan was originally adopted in 1989. While a number of amendments to individual elements have been made over the years, no comprehensive review or major overhaul of
the General Plan has been completed since th original adoption. Typically, general plans cover a planning horizon of 15 -20 years, after which they may lose their currency and become
less effective. Anticipated Environmental Review: Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Project Number: WMC09A Department/District: Planning & Building General Plan Consistency: The elements
of a general plan must be internally consistent. Location: Citywide A comprehensive update will ensure internal consistency. 3-5
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies
0 60,000 60,000 60,000 Ongoing 180,000 Plan, Design & Engineering Land Purchase Construction Other Project Cost: 0 60,000 0 60,000 0 60,000 0 180,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense:
N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund 0 60,000 60,000 60,000 Ongoing 180,000 Project
Cost: 0 60,000 0 60,000 0 60,000 0 180,000 Project Title: Finance Studies: Fee Study/Cost Allocation Plan Review and OPEB Liability Calculations Project Description: Review of Planning,
Engineering & Fire Prevention, Parks & Recreation Development Related Fees, Cost Allocation Plan & Overhead Rates and Traffic, Park, Fire and Drainage Mitigation Fees and Biannual Other-Post
Employment Benefit Actuarial Study (OPEB). Project Justification: By Council direction or accounting regulation, the Finance Department is required to conduct various financial studies.
Anticipated Environmental Review: N/A Project Number: WMC10B Department/District: Planning, Engineering, Fire Prevention Parks & Recreation and Finance Location: N/A General Plan Consistency:
N/A 3-6
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies
Plan, Design & Engineering 253,911 187,411 187,411 628,733 Land Purchase Construction Other Project Cost: 253,911 187,411 187,411 0 0 0 0 628,733 Anticipated Future Operating Expense:
SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Coastal Zone Management Fund (210) 253,911 187,411 187,411 628,733
Project Cost: 253,911 187,411 187,411 0 0 0 0 628,733 Project Title: SANDAG -Regional Beach Sand Project II (RBSPII) Project Description: The Shoreline Preservation Working Group from
SANDAG has begun the Regional Beach Sand Project II which includes planning, design, construction and monitoring. This project will repeat the Regional Beach Replenishment project from
2001. Project Justification: The San Diego County coastline is in a constant state of erosion. Wide sandy beaches protect the public safety and reduce storm related damages to the bluffs,
Hwy 101 and the restaurants in Cardiff by the Sea. Sandy beaches also improve tourism which provides revenues to the local merchants. Anticipated Environmental Review: CEQA Review Project
Number: WMB08B Department/District: Engineering Services Location: Encinitas Beaches General Plan Consistency: The Regional Beach Sand Project II is consistent with the Resource Management
Element Goal #10 stating that the City will preserve the integrity, function, productivity, and long term viability of environmentally sensitive habitats throughout the City, including
kelp-beds, ocean recreational areas, coastal water, beaches, lagoons and their up-lands, riparian areas, coastal strand areas, coastal sage scrub and coastal mixed chaparral habitats.
(See policy 10.3) 3-7
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies
212,201 17,180 40,000 25,000 294,381 Plan, Design & Engineering . Land Purchase Construction Other Project Cost: 212,201 17,180 40,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 294,381 Anticipated Future Operating
Expense: SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total 210-6040-451-42-31 BA 66,600 66,600 Coastal Zone Management
Fund (210) 145,601 17,180 40,000 25,000 227,781 Project Cost: 212,201 17,180 40,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 294,381 Project Title: Sand Compatibility Opportunistic Use Program (SCOUP) Project
Description: This program will identify beach quality sand that can be utilized for Opportunistic Use Program. Opportunistic Use Projects include; underground parking structures, I-5
widening project, or other material generated
by land development that would otherwise be exported to a landfill. Permits must be obtained from ACOE, State Lands, State Parks, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Coastal
Commission. Monitoring and mitigation will be included in project costs. Project Justification: The San Diego County coastline is in a constant sate of erosion. Wide sandy beaches protect
the public safety and reduce storm related damages to the bluffs, Hwy 101 and the restaurants in Cardiff by the Sea. Sandy beaches also improve tourism which provides revenues to the
local merchants. Anticipated Environmental Review: CEQA Review Project Number: WMB08C Department/District: Engineering Services Location: Encinitas Beaches General Plan Consistency:
The Regional Beach Sand Project II is consistent with the Resource Management Element Goal #10 stating that the City will preserve the integrity, function, productivity, and long term
viability of environmentally sensitive habitats throughout the City, including kelp-beds, ocean recreational areas, coastal water, beaches, lagoons and their up-lands, riparian areas,
coastal strand areas, coastal sage scrub and coastal mixed chaparral habitats. (See policy 10.3) 3-8
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies
41,000 110,000 151,000 Plan, Design & Engineering Land Purchase Construction Other Project Cost: 41,000 110,000 0 0 0 0 0 151,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF
Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund 41,000 110,000 151,000 Project Cost: 41,000 110,000 0 0 0 0
0 151,000 Project Title: Citywide Flood Control and Channel Maintenance Permitting Program Project Description: Stormwater and flood control systems collect, convey, detain, treat and
discharge runoff throughout the City. This system of structures and channels manage these flows and provide protection of life and property by preventing flooding and related effects.
Accumulated sediment, debris, and vegetation can reduce their function, driving the need for ongoing maintenance. In balancing the critical maintenance needs of these facilities and
the potential impacts to biological resources present in these areas, the City will pursue a comprehensive and citywide programmatic permit authorization for long-term channel and flood
control facility maintenance activities. Project Justification: Citywide flood control facility and channel maintenance activities continue to be burdened by cumbersome, time-consuming
and costly regulatory permitting requirements. Permits required for comprehensive channel and flood control facility maintenance necessitate authorization from multiple regulatory agencies.
This project was identified to develop a citywide programmatic permit for ongoing maintenance activities, to streamline the permitting process, and provide cost effective efficiencies.
Anticipated Environmental Review: To Be Determined by Initial Environmental Assessment Project Number: WMC09D Department/District: Engineering Services Location: Citywide General Plan
Consistency: This project is supported by General Plan policies requiring the City to "minimize potential hazards to public health, safety and welfare" (PS-2) and to "provide adequate
levels of maintenance of all improved components of the circulation system such as...roadway drainage systems"(C-1.19). 3-9
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies
Plan, Design & Engineering Land Purchase Construction 50,000 50,000 100,000 Other Project Cost: 0 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: Operating costs
included in Fund 295 Traffic Signal Maintenance budget. SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY13/14 6 Years Total ELLD (Fund
295) 50,000 50,000 100,000 Project Cost: 0 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000 Project Title: Citywide Landscape and Lighting District Prop 218 Ballot Project Description: The current City
of Encinitas Landscape & Lighting District (ELLD), was formed in 1989. The assessments provide a dedicated source of funding for the construction, operation, maintenance and servicing
of street lighting, traffic signals, and landscaping within the City. The existing citywide assessment has not been adjusted since 1996, maintenance costs continue to increase, and consequently,
the ELLD Citywide Zones are projected to experience a shortfall beginning in FY2012. This project will utilize the services of a contract assessment engineer to prepare a ballot to be
mailed to every property owner subject to the proposed assessment increase as required by Prop 218. Project Justification: To address future landscape and lighting demands along with
rising utility costs, staff is proposing an assessment rate increase beginning FY2011-12, which will require a ballot measure as outlined by Proposition 218. The election cost is expected
to be $100,000 over a two-year period. Anticipated Environmental Review: Exempt Project Number: WMC10C Department/District: Engineering Services Location: N/A General Plan Consistency:
Policy 1.19 of the General Plan states, "The City will provide for adequate levels of maintenance of all improved components of the circulation system, such as roadways, sidewalks, sidewalks,
bicycle facilities, roadway drainage systems, pedestrian, recreational trails, bicycle trails and facilities." 3-10
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies
Plan, Design & Engineering Land Purchase Construction 28,800 28,800 28,800 28,800 115,200 Other Project Cost: 0 28,800 28,800 28,800 28,800 0 0 0 115,200 Anticipated Future Operating
Expense: Operating costs included in Fund 295 Traffic Signal Maintenance budget. SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY13/14
6 Years Total ELLD (Fund 295) 28,800 28,800 28,800 28,800 115,200 Project Cost: 0 28,800 28,800 28,800 28,800 0 0 0 115,200 Project Title: Traffic Signals Red and Green LED Light Replacement
Project Description: Conversion from incandescent bulbs to LED fixtures uses approximately 85% less electricity and have a significantly longer useful life. In addition, LEDs are virtually
maintenance free, eliminating annual re-lamping costs that require trucks and manpower to replace the bulbs which also tie up traffic. The City upgraded its red and green incandescent
bulbs with LED bulbs beginning in 1999. This project will create a four year program to replace red and green LED lights in traffic signals. Project Justification: In 1999, the City
began replacing its incandescent bulbs to LEDs, which have a life of six to ten years. Currently, the City replaces the LEDs on an as-needed basis. The City needs to create a program
in which to replace the LEDs in a systematic and more cost-effective manner. Anticipated Environmental Review: Exempt Project Number: WMC10D Department/District: Engineering Services
Location: Citywide General Plan Consistency: Goal 1 of the Circulation Element states, "Encinitas should have a transportation system that is safe, convenient, efficient…" Policy 1.14
states, "A coordinated traffic signal system shall be developed and implemented." 3-11
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies
75,000 100,000 100,000 275,000 Plan, Design & Engineering Land Purchase Construction Other Project Cost: 0 75,000 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 275,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense:
N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Replacement 75,000 100,000 100,000 275,000 Project Cost:
0 75,000 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 275,000 Project Title: SDWD Water Rate Study Project Description: This project involves the hiring of a consultant to update the District's water rates,
fees, and service charges. Project Justification: Water rates and service charges need to updated regularly so that the District can meet its financial obligations. Anticipated Environmental
Review: Categorical Exemption Art. 19, Section 15302(c) Project Number: CWW10J Department/Department/District: San Dieguito Water District Location: N/A General Plan Consistency: Supply
of potable drinking water is a fundamental responsibility of the District, and is supported in the City's General Plan by RM-1 to, "conserve, protect, and enhance the water resources
in the Planning Area." 3-12
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies
75,000 75,000 Plan, Design & Engineering Land Purchase Construction Other Project Cost: 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond
Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Replacement 75,000 75,000 Project Cost: 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Project Title: SDWD
Drought Allocation Study Project Description: This project involves the hiring of a consultant to create a water allocation system for each customer served by the San Dieguito Water
District. The methodology of an allocation system is to not penalize persons for the previous implementation of conservation methods or the installation of water-saving devices. Project
Justification: Drought Response Conservation Program Ordinance 2008-01 states that SDWD may establish a water allocation system during a Level 2 drought response. An allocation system
establishes the quantity of water each customer is allowed to have during mandatory drought reduction conditions. Anticipated Environmental Review: Categorical Exemption Art. 19, Section
15302(c) Project Number: CWW10M Department/District: San Dieguito Water District Location: District-wide General Plan Consistency: Supply of potable drinking water is a fundamental responsibility
of the District, and is supported in the City's General Plan by RM-1 to, "conserve, protect, and enhance the water resources in the Planning Area." 3-13
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Insert Photo Here Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years
Total Consultants/Studies 150,000 6 0,000 210,000 Plan, Design & Engineering Land Purchase Construction Other Project Cost: 150,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 210,000 Anticipated Future Operating
Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Expansion 150,000 60,000 210,000 Project Cost:
150,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 210,000 Project Title: SDWD Water Master Plan Project Description: This project involves hiring a consultant to evaluate the District's existing and future water
distribution system capital improvement needs, make recommendations to meet those needs and prepare a preliminary opinion of probable cost for each of the proposed improvements. The
additional cost for FY09/10 will provide funding for the Programmed EIR for the completed SDWD Water Water Master Plan. Project Justification: Completion of a Water Master Plan will
identify water system capital improvements needed to correct existing deficiencies, improve system reliability and meet future demands. Those improvements identified are incorporated
into the District's financial plan to ensure adequate funding will be available when needed. Anticipated Environmental Review: Programmed Environmental Impact Report Section 15091 of
the CEQA Guidelines Project Number: CWW09H Department/District: San Dieguito Water District Location: N/A General Plan Consistency: Supply of potable drinking water is fundamental responsibility
of the District, and is supported in the City's General Plan by RM-1 to, "conserve, protect, and enhance the water resources in the Planning Area." 3-14
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Digital Landbase
Rebuild 309,100 82,500 391,600 Digital Orthophotos/Topo 75,000 30,000 30,000 Ongoing 135,000 Project Cost: 384,100 82,500 0 30,000 0 30,000 0 526,600 Anticipated Future Operating Expense*
53,082 54,940 64,428 73,518 77,193 81,052 404,213 SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund
277,700 82,500 30,000 30,000 Ongoing 420,200 Transfer from WMC00B 30,000 30,000 Transfer from WMC01H 76,400 76,400 Project Cost: 384,100 82,500 0 30,000 0 30,000 0 526,600 * Anticipated
that one GIS Tech resource will be needed to maintain all land information data in the City's GIS system. Project Title: Digital Topography/GIS Basemap Updates and Enhancements Project
Description: This project will consist of two significant tasks. The first is a one-time effort to enhance our GIS landbase layers (i.e. assessor parcels) to make them more positionally
accurate, as well as collect additional landbase layers such as lots, subdivision boundaries, and other landbase information. The second effort is the continued update of the City's
digital orthophotography and topography, starting in fiscal year 01/02 and recurring every 3 years. Project Justification: The current digital basemap is positionally inaccurate by up
to 50 feet in some areas. When the basemap is overlaid with more accurate layers, such as the digital orthophotography, there is significant misalignment. This results in the misrepresentation
of the location of City assets and property lines, and inaccurate calculations. By correcting the landbase, data layers that are developed/updated will also be more spatially accurate,
and the City will have a higher degree of confidence when performing spatial calculations for regulatory compliance, etc. In addition, topographic data has been used in a number of City
projects and has been supplied to consultants to lower the data development costs in their contracts. This project will also provide high quality topography and digital imagery, which
can be used directly by staff and consultants and can directly lower costs of individual projects. Anticipated Environmental Review: Not a "Project" as defined by CEQA Project Number:
WMC01A Department/District: City Manager -GIS General Plan Consistency: N/A Location: Citywide 3-15
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Insert Photo Here Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years
Total Financial, HR, Utility Billing System 3 33,000 334,000 667,000 Permitting System 500,827 500,827 Database Conversion 26,924 26,924 Project Cost: 527,751 333,000 334,000 0 0 0 0
1,194,751 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 245,000 SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12
FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund 527,751 333,000 334,000 1,194,751 Project Cost: 527,751 333,000 334,000 0 0 0 0 1,194,751 Project Title: H.T.E. System Replacement
Project Project Description: This project includes software and implementation costs to replace the City's H.T.E. system and associated custom software implemented over 18 years ago.
Implementation of a citywide Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system will provide an integrated solution to run core City business processes including finance, payroll, human resources,
cashiering, utility billing and permitting. Project Justification: This project addresses deficiencies with the current system including technology obsolescence, major feature gaps,
lack of business process automation, lack of vendor commitment to customer support and new product development, difficulty in integrating with existing systems, high total cost of ownership,
and risks associated with company acquisition. Key project benefits include greater employee efficiency, improved business processes, enhanced customer service, accurate data reporting
and timely access to critical business information. Anticipated Environmental Review: N/A Project Number: WMC09C Department/District: City Mgr/IT Div Location: Citywide General Plan
Consistency: N/A 3-16
CONSULTANT SERVICES AND STUDIES (WORK PROJECTS) FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total DMS and GIS
Integration 27,000 26,000 53,000 City interests in Public ROW: map encumbrances, curb & gutter,and index 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000 Cityworks/GIS Field Solution for Fire 70,000
70,000 140,000 Cityworks Server 30,000 30,000 30,000 90,000 Cityworks Storeroom for Water 30,000 30,000 Windows Operating System Upgrade 50,000 50,000 Ongoing 100,000 Microsoft Office
Upgrade 75,000 75,000 Ongoing 150,000 Information Security & Disaster Recovery 40,000 40,000 Ongoing 80,000 Server Optimization/Virtualization 52,000 30,000 Ongoing 82,000 Systems Management
Improvement 27,500 15,000 Ongoing 42,500 Data Warehouse for Data Integrity 25,000 25,000 50,000 Project Cost: 0 144,500 150,000 207,000 216,000 95,000 205,000 1,017,500 Anticipated Future
Operating Expense: Advanced Support 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Ongoing 20,000 Software Maintenance 7,500 7,500 19,500 27,500 27,500 27,500 Ongoing 117,000 Total Operating Expense: 0 7,500
7,500 24,500 32,500 32,500 32,500 Ongoing 137,000 SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund
144,500 150,000 207,000 216,000 95,000 205,000 1,017,500 Project Cost: 0 144,500 150,000 207,000 216,000 95,000 205,000 1,017,500 Project Title: Technology Replacement Project Project
Description: Technology is critical to the City's productivity and service to citizens. Periodic upgrades are required to remain secure and reliable. It is important to keep the City's
systems updated to maintain the substantial investment that has been made. Project Justification: To refresh and maintain the information technology infrastructure of the City. Anticipated
Environmental Review: N/A Project Number: WMC10A Department/District: IT/GIS (Enterprise) Location: N/A General Plan Consistency: N/A 3-17
This page is intentionally left blank. 3-18
SUMMARY OF DRAINAGE PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Page Prior Beyond Project No. Project Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total 4-2 Storm Drain Repair Fund (CMD05E)
1,200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Ongoing 2,700,000 Project Total 1,200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 2,700,000 Prior Beyond Funding Project
Funding Sources Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Flood Control Fee Fund 285,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 585,000 General Fund 915,000
200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2,115,000 Project Total 1,200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 2,700,000 4-1
DRAINAGE PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan, Design & Engineering
Land Purchase Construction 1,200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Ongoing 2,700,000 Other Project Cost: 1,200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 2,700,000
Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund 915,000
200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Ongoing 2,115,000 Flood Control Fees 285,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 585,000 Project Cost: 1,200,000 250,000 250,000
250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 2,700,000 Project Title: Storm Drain Repair Fund Project Description: Provides a contingency fund for required emergency response to failures in the City's
storm drain system. Project Justification: The City's storm drain system is aged and deteriorating in a variety of locations, and some failures are inevitable. The City is pro-actively
monitoring high-risk areas with video equipment. Ready funds are needed to facilitate repairs as soon as serious problems are identified, thus minimizing the risk of larger or more catastrophic
failures. Anticipated Environmental Review: Categorically Exempt Project Number: CMD05E Department/District: Engineering Services/Public Works Location: Citywide General Plan Consistency:
This project is supported by General Plan policies requiring the City to "minimize potential hazards to public health, safety and welfare" (PS-2) and to "provide adequate levels of maintenance
of all improved components of the circulation system such as...roadway drainage systems"(C-1.19). 4-2
SUMMARY OF WASTEWATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Page Prior Beyond Project No. Project Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total 5-2 CSD Share of CIPs at San Elijo
(CCE10A) 3 60,670 388,698 892,875 1,550,031 796,325 852,395 1,083,355 Ongoing 5,924,349 5-3 ESD Share of CIPs at Batiquitos Pump Station (CEE04A) 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
50,000 Ongoing 350,000 5-4 ESD Share of CIPs at Encina (CEE10B) 49,352 193,517 286,106 264,607 192,009 200,356 209,033 Ongoing 1,394,980 5-5 CSD Master Plan Implementation (Various)
7 ,100,936 668,505 487,245 1,531,187 1,800,434 1,872,451 570,008 Ongoing 14,030,766 5-6 ESD Master Plan Implementation (Various) 2 ,698,438 543,652 559,962 576,760 594,063 617,826 642,539
Ongoing 6,233,239 Project Totals 1 0,259,396 1,844,372 2,276,188 3,972,585 3,432,831 3,593,027 2,554,934 27,933,333 Prior Beyond Funding Project Funding Sources Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11
FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total CSD Replacement Fund 6 ,849,985 997,203 1,380,120 2,773,882 2,214,730 2,327,536 1,653,363 Ongoing 18,196,819 CSD Expansion Fund 611,621
60,000 307,336 382,029 397,310 Ongoing 1,758,296 ESD Replacement Fund 2 ,744,699 787,169 896,068 891,367 836,072 868,181 901,571 Ongoing 7,925,128 ESD Expansion Fund 53,091 Ongoing 53,091
Project Totals 1 0,259,396 1,844,372 2,276,188 3,972,585 3,432,831 3,593,027 2,554,934 27,933,333 5-1
WASTEWATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Miscellaneous Projects Ongoing 71,430 83,335
9 5,240 1 07,145 1 19,050 130,955 607,155 Biosolids Building 35,715 35,715 3 5,715 3 5,715 3 5,715 952,400 1,130,975 Electrical Upgrades 97,621 571,440 669,061 Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation
171,432 171,432 Ocean Outfall 12,500 2 2,500 1 50,000 185,000 Seismic Restraint Retrofit 19,048 9 5,240 114,288 Digester Rehabilitation/Upgrade 76,192 5 23,820 600,012 FOG/Combined Heat
& Power 107,145 7 14,300 821,445 Headworks/Grit Chamber Rehab 5 7,144 2 85,720 342,864 Odor Scrubber Replacement 2 8,572 2 14,290 242,862 Solar Panels for Hardscape 2 8,572 2 38,100
266,672 Building Improvements 3 0,953 1 90,480 221,433 Class A Biosolids Process 4 7,620 1 42,860 190,480 Project Cost: 360,670 388,698 892,875 1,550,031 7 96,325 852,395 1,083,355 5,924,349
Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total CSD Replacement fund
(502) 360,670 388,698 892,875 1 ,550,031 7 96,325 8 52,395 1,083,355 Ongoing 5,924,349 Project Cost: 360,670 388,698 892,875 1,550,031 7 96,325 852,395 1,083,355 5,924,349 Project Title:
CSD Share of Capital Improvements at San Elijo Water Reclamation Facility Project Description: This project funds CSD's share of capital improvements for the San Elijo Water Reclamation
Facility (SEWRF). Projects were identified in the SEWRF 2008 Master Plan update. Project Justification: As a member agency of the San Elijo Joint Powers Authority, the City of Encinitas
shares in all of the sewage treatment plant operating and capital costs. The proposed improvements will assist the plant in meeting its required maintenance responsibilities. Anticipated
Environmental Review: N/A (Transfer of Funds) Project Number: CCE10A Department/District: Cardiff Sanitary Div. Location: San Elijo Water Reclamation Facility (2695 Manchester Manchester
Avenue) General Plan Consistency: Consistent with Resource Management Goal 6, which states "The City will make every effort to reduce the amount of solid and liquid waste generated in
the Planning Area and will identify ways to responsibly deal with these wastes", and Policy RM-2.2 , which states "the City shall encourage the highest feasible level of treatment of
wastewater prior to entering the outfalls and continually encourage the reduction of volume of wastewater to said outfalls by this City and other jurisdictions." 5-2
WASTEWATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Misc. Improvements 50,000 5 0,000 5 0,000
50,000 50,000 50,000 5 0,000 Ongoing 350,000 Project Cost: 50,000 5 0,000 5 0,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 5 0,000 350,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year
Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total ESD Replacement Fund (522) 50,000 5 0,000 5 0,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 5 0,000 Ongoing
350,000 Project Cost: 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 350,000 Project Title: ESD Share of Capital Improvements at Batiquitos Pump Station Project Description: The City's
share of capital improvements at the Leucadia Wastewater District's Batiquitos Pump Station facility. The District plans to replace the pump station in Fiscal Year 2009-2010. Project
Justification: The City of Encinitas has 22.14% ownership in the Batiquitos Pump Station. As a co-owner, the City is responsible for its share of the proposed capital improvements. These
improvements assist the pump station in meeting necessary up-keep and maintenance responsibilities and will reduce the risk of possible sewage spills into Batiquitos Lagoon. Anticipated
Environmental Review: N/A (Transfer of Funds) Project Number: CEE04A Department/District: Encinitas Sanitary Division Location: Leucadia County Water District Facilities in Carlsbad
(1960 La Costa Avenue, Carlsbad) General Plan Consistency: Consistent with Resource Management Goal 6, which states "The City will make every effort to reduce the amount of solid and
liquid waste generated in the Planning Area and will identify ways to responsibly deal with these wastes." 5-3
WASTEWATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Plant Rehabilitation Ongoing 1 17,854 2
06,765 229,803 153,138 1 57,425 161,833 Ongoing 1 ,026,819 Prof. Engineering Svcs. Ongoing 3,751 3,882 4,013 4,149 4,266 4,385 Ongoing 24,446 Capital Acquisitions Ongoing 15,715 16,249
16,801 17,372 17,859 18,359 Ongoing 102,355 EWA Labor Ongoing 42,384 44,927 47,622 50,480 53,508 56,719 Ongoing 295,640 Planned Asset Replacement Ongoing 13,813 14,283 14,768 15,270
15,697 16,137 Ongoing 89,968 South Parcel (lease revenue) Ongoing (48,400) (48,400) (48,400) (48,400) Ongoing (193,600) Project Cost: 49,352 193,517 286,106 264,607 192,009 200,356 209,033
1,394,980 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total ESD Replacement
Fund (522) 49,352 193,517 286,106 264,607 192,009 200,356 209,033 Ongoing 1,394,980 Project Cost: 49,352 193,517 286,106 264,607 192,009 200,356 209,033 1,394,980 Project Title: ESD
Share of Capital Improvements at Encina Wastewater Authority Project Description: The Encina Water Pollution Control Facilities (EWPCF) are located in Carlsbad and managed by the Encina
Wastewater Authority. The EWPCF provides wastewater treatment and disposal services to six member agencies, including the City of Encinitas. This project funds the City's share of capital
improvements at the EWPCF. South Parcel lease revenue is anticipated to begin in FY12. Project Justification: As a member agency
of Encina Wastewater Authority, the City of Encinitas shares in all of the sewage treatment plant operating and capital costs. ESD's share is based upon the City's 4.84% ownership. Anticipated
Environmental Review: N/A (Transfer of Funds) Project Number: CEE10B Department/District: Encinitas Sanitary Location: Encina Water Pollution Control Facilities in Carlsbad (6200 Avenida
Encinas) General Plan Consistency: Consistent with Resource Management Goal 6, which states "The City will make every effort to reduce the amount of solid and liquid waste generated
in the Planning Area and will identify ways to responsibly deal with these wastes", and Policy RM-2.2 , which states "the City shall encourage the highest feasible level of treatment
of wastewater prior to entering the outfalls and continually encourage the reduction of volume of wastewater to said outfalls by this City and other jurisdictions." 5-4
WASTEWATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Collection System Rehabilitation (CCE04E)
1,213,945 4 68,505 4 87,245 506,735 5 27,004 5 48,084 5 70,008 4 ,321,526 Somerset Main Replacement (CCE07B) 392,496 Cardiff Pump Station Upgrades (CCE04G) 434,000 434,000 OTS -Alignment
Study/Replacement (CCE04J) 325,463 200,000 1,024,452 1 ,273,430 1,324,367 4 ,147,712 Olivenhain PS Upgrades/Replacement (CCE04F) 4,500,000 4 ,500,000 Sewer Extension Program (CCE04H)
102,432 1 02,432 Master Plan Update and I&I Study (CCE07C) 132,600 1 32,600 Project Cost: 7,100,936 668,505 487,245 1,531,187 1 ,800,434 1,872,451 570,008 13,638,270 Anticipated Future
Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total CSD Replacement Reserve (502) 6,489,315
608,505 487,245 1,223,851 1 ,418,405 1,475,141 570,008 13,638,270 CSD Expansion Reserve (503) 611,621 60,000 307,336 3 82,029 397,310 Project Cost: 7,100,936 668,505 487,245 1,531,187
1 ,800,434 1,872,451 570,008 13,638,270 Project Title: CSD Master Plan Implementation Project Description: These projects were identified through the course of the 2003 CSD Master Plan
Update. The CIP includes pipeline rehabilitation projects, pipeline capacity improvements, pump station operational and capacity improvements, and several miscellaneous projects. Project
Justification: These projects are needed to prevent potential spills and other system breakdowns which could result in environmental damage as well as financial consequences to the City.
Projects identified by the 2003 Master Plan Update have been prioritized based on capacity and rehabilitation needs. Anticipated Environmental Review: To Be Determined by Initial Environmental
Assessment Project Number: See Below Department/District: Cardiff Sanitary Division Location: N/A General Plan Consistency: Consistent with Resource Management Goal 6, which states "The
City will make every effort to reduce the amount of solid and liquid waste generated in the Planning Area and will identify ways to responsibly deal with these wastes." 5-5
WASTEWATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Collection System Rehab (CEE04H) 2,534,436
5 43,652 5 59,962 5 76,760 5 94,063 6 17,826 6 42,539 6 ,069,237 Sewer Extensions Program (CEE04K) 53,091 5 3,091 Master Plan Update (CEE07B) 110,911 1 10,911 Project Cost: 2,698,438
543,652 5 59,962 5 76,760 5 94,063 617,826 642,539 6 ,233,239 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12
FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total ESD Replacement Reserve (522) 2,645,347 543,652 5 59,962 5 76,760 5 94,063 6 17,826 6 42,539 6 ,180,148 ESD Expansion Reserve (523) 53,091 5 3,091
Project Cost: 2,698,438 543,652 5 59,962 5 76,760 5 94,063 617,826 642,539 6 ,233,239 Project Title: ESD Master Plan Implementation Project Description: These projects were identified
through the course of the 2003 ESD Master Plan Update. The CIP includes pipeline rehabilitation projects, pipeline capacity improvements and several miscellaneous projects. Project Justification:
These projects are needed to prevent potential spills and other system breakdowns which could result in environmental damage as well as financial consequences to the City. Projects identified
by the 2003 Master Plan Update have been prioritized based on capacity and rehabilitation needs. The ESD collection system is aging, with the majority of the sewer lines having been
constructed in the 1950’s and 1960’s. Anticipated Environmental Review: To Be Determined by Initial Environmental Assessment Project Number: See Below Department/District: Encinitas
Sanitary Division Location: Moonlight Beach Pump Station General Plan Consistency: Consistent with Resource Management Goal 6, which states "The City will make every effort to reduce
the amount of solid and liquid waste generated in the Planning Area and will identify ways to responsibly deal with these wastes." 5-6
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Page Prior Beyond Project No. Project Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total 6-2 Civic Center Improvements
(CMF10A) Ongoing 170,000 175,000 180,000 185,000 190,000 195,000 Ongoing 1,095,000 6-3 Library AV Room Equipment (CMF09B) 6,000 34,000 10,000 50,000 Project Totals 6,000 204,000 175,000
180,000 185,000 200,000 195,000 1,145,000 Prior Beyond Funding Project Funding Sources Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Facility Improvements (152)
Ongoing 170,000 175,000 180,000 185,000 190,000 195,000 Ongoing 1,095,000 General Fund 34,000 10,000 44,000 Donations 6,000 6,000 Project Totals 6,000 204,000 175,000 180,000 185,000
200,000 195,000 1,145,000 6-1
PUBLIC FACILITIES PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Facility Improvements and Major Repairs
Ongoing 170,000 175,000 180,000 185,000 190,000 195,000 Ongoing 1,095,000 Project Cost: 0 170,000 175,000 180,000 185,000 190,000 195,000 1,095,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense:
N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Facility Improvements (152) Ongoing 170,000 175,000 180,000
185,000 190,000 195,000 Ongoing 1,095,000 Project Cost: 0 170,000 175,000 180,000 185,000 190,000 195,000 1,095,000 Project Title: Civic Center Improvements Project Description: This
project provides ongoing funding from Civic Center rents to fund major replacements and improvements to common areas of the Civic Center. Project Justification: Major maintenance and
replacement of aging equipment and systems is necessary and vital to maintaining a safe and stable workplace environment. Anticipated Environmental Review: N/A Project Number: CMF10A
Department/District: Public Works Location: Civic Center at 505 South Vulcan Avenue General Plan Consistency: While the Civic Center Improvement project does not explicitly further the
goals and policies of the General Plan, it will be carried out in conformance with applicable development standards and design recommendations of the Downtown Encinitas Specific Plan.
6-2
PUBLIC FACILITIES PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan, Design
& Engineering Land Purchase Construction Other 6,000 34,000 10,000 50,000 Project Cost: 6,000 34,000 0 0 0 10,000 0 50,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: 500 518 536 554 574 2,682
SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund 34,000 10,000 44,000 Earmarked community donations
6,000 6,000 Project Cost: 6,000 34,000 0 0 0 10,000 0 50,000 Project Title: Audio Visual Equipment -Community Room, Encinitas Com. Library Project Description: Purchase and installation
of audio-visual (AV) equipment to support library programming and special functions in the Community Room at the Encinitas Community Library. Project Justification: Community donations
received for the new library project were not sufficient to fund acquisition and installation of AV equipment needs for the Community Room. Audio and video equipment is desired to support
library and community programs use of the room. Equipment replacement for elements of the system estimated at five year increment. Anticipated Environmental Review: N/A Project Number:
CMF09B Department/District: City Managers Office/Information Technology Location: Community Room, Encinitas Community Library General Plan Consistency: 6-3
This page is intentionally left blank. 6-4
SUMMARY OF PARKS AND BEACHES PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Page Prior Beyond Project No. Project Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total 7-2 Hall Property Environmental
Review, Design and Development Phase I (CMP02D) 10,987,754 1,000,000 300,000 200,000 375,000 725,000 1,000,000 7,087,246 21,675,000 7-3 Habitat/Watershed/Open Space Acquisition (Appropriations
Less Transfers Out) (CMP05A) 795,397 110,000 115,000 130,000 135,000 140,000 150,000 Ongoing 1,575,397 7-4 Recreational Trails Development Fund (Appropriations Less Transfers Out) (CMP00F)
485,000 30,000 0 30,000 0 30,000 0 Ongoing 575,000 7-5 Standard Pacific Park Site Development (CMP10A) 0 0 0 0 0 212,060 0 Ongoing 212,060 Project Totals 12,268,151 1,140,000 415,000
360,000 510,000 1,107,060 1,150,000 7,087,246 24,037,457 Prior Beyond Funding Project Funding Sources Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund
6,232,178 880,000 150,000 30,000 175,000 530,000 750,000 7,087,246 15,834,424 2001 Bond Proceeds 3,655,306 3,655,306 Parkland Fees for Acquisition 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 254,560
100,000 754,560 Park Development Fees 621,155 150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 282,500 250,000 1,853,655 Grants 560,713 560,713 TransNet 1,153,799 1,153,799 Open Space Impact Fees 25,000
10,000 15,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 50,000 205,000 Other/Outside Source 20,000 20,000 Project Totals 12,268,151 1,140,000 415,000 360,000 510,000 1,107,060 1,150,000 7,087,246 24,037,457
7-1
PARKS AND BEACHES PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan, Design
& Engineering 1,500,000 1,500,000 Construction 9,487,754 1,000,000 300,000 200,000 375,000 725,000 1,000,000 7,087,246 20,175,000 Other (Return of General Fund Loan) Project Cost: 10,987,754
1,000,000 300,000 200,000 375,000 725,000 1,000,000 7,087,246 21,675,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11
FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total 2001 Bond Proceeds (for dvlpmnt) 3,655,306 3,655,306 General Fund (for dvlpmnt) 4,355,977 850,000 150,000 175,000 500,000 750,000 7,087,246
13,868,223 Transfer GF in from other projects 1,376,201 1,376,201 TransNet (Less Transfer to CMD04D) 1,153,799 1,153,799 Park Development Fees 150,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 225,000
250,000 1,175,000 Grants 426,471 426,471 Outside Source 20,000 20,000 Project Funding: 10,987,754 1,000,000 300,000 200,000 375,000 725,000 1,000,000 7,087,246 21,675,000 Project Title:
Hall Property Environmental Review, Design and Development -Phase I Project Description: The City of Encinitas purchased 44+/-acres of property, commonly known as the Hall Property,
located west of Interstate 5 and south of Santa Fe Drive in Cardiff. This project funds the environmental review, planning, design and development of a community park on the site. The
conceptual planning and environmental review of this future park is currently underway. Project Justification: A significant deficiency of park space exists in the area as is indicated
in the City's General Plan and Technical Appendices. Anticipated Environmental Review: Environmental Impact Report Project Number: CMP02D Department/District: Parks & Recreation Location:
West of Interstate 5 and South of Santa Fe Drive in Cardiff General Plan Consistency: This project is consistent with Recreation Element of the General Plan, RE Policy 1.5 "Provide a
minimum of of 15 acres of local recreational area for each 1,000 population for the entire community," and RE Policy 1.15 "Provide the playing fields necessary to serve the community."
.-,5 (/10 1 .-,5 (/10 1 7-2
PARKS AND BEACHES PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS/CONTRIBUTIONS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Open Space Purchase
795,397 110,000 115,000 130,000 135,000 140,000 150,000 Ongoing 1,575,397 Project Cost: 795,397 110,000 115,000 130,000 135,000 140,000 150,000 1,575,397 Anticipated Future Operating
Expense: N/A SOURCE Prior Year Beyond Project OF FUNDS Expenses FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund 15,000 15,000 Park Dev Fee/Parkland Acquisition
621,155 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Ongoing 1,221,155 Open Space Impact Fees 25,000 10,000 15,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 50,000 205,000 TEA Grant/EEM Grant 134,242
134,242 Total: 795,397 110,000 115,000 130,000 135,000 140,000 150,000 1,575,397 Project Title: Habitat/Watershed/Open Space Acquisition Project Description: This project involves the
acquisition and preservation of habitat/open space parcels from willing sellers in support of the City's Multiple Habitat Conservation Program (MHCP), Storm Water/Watershed Management
Program and habitat preservation and open space goals. The City will utilize local funds to leverage federal and state grants. Project Justification: A number of areas within the City
and sphere of influence contain environmentally sensitive habitats that, once lost, cannot be replaced. Many of these areas contain plant and animal species that are environmentally
unique, while other areas are valued by the community for aesthetic or open space qualities. The City seeks to establish a balance between new development and the maintenance and preservation
of these valuable resources. Anticipated Environmental Review: Exempt from CEQA Project Number: CMP05A Department/District: Planning&Building/Parks&Rec/Engineering Location: Various
Locations General Plan Consistency: The Habitat/Watershed/Open Space Acquisition Program is consistent with Resource Management Element Goal 10 stating that "the City will preserve the
integrity, function, productivity, and long-term viability of environmentally sensitive habitats throughout the City..." (see also M Policies 10.4, 10.5, 10.8, 10.9, and 10.10) and the
General Plan RE 1.4, "Establish a balance of natural open space...preserve and maintain the natural environment." 7-3
PARKS AND BEACHES PROJECTS FY2010-2015 COSTS/CONTRIBUTIONS: Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Construction
485,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Ongoing 575,000 Project Cost: 485,000 30,000 0 30,000 0 30,000 0 575,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: 4,600 8,800 11,000 13,200 15,400 17,600 20,000
90,600 SOURCE Prior Year Beyond Project OF FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total General Fund 485,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Ongoing 575,000
Total: 485,000 30,000 0 30,000 0 30,000 0 575,000 Project Title: Recreational Trails Development Fund Project Description: This project provides multi-year, annual funding for acquisition
and construction of recreation trails per the Recreation Trails Master Plan. Funding to be augmented with grant funds as available. In FY2001 funding for this program was reduced from
$150,000 to $75,000 and in FY2004 funding for this program was cut completely because of a healthy fund balance, grant funding received and the lack of trail construction at the time.
In FY2008 annual funding in the amount of $75,000 was re-established. It is anticipated that the Master Plan could be completed within the next 6-8 years. There are currently 35 miles
of developed recreational trails. Project Justification: The Recreation Trails Master Plan identifies a system of trails throughout the City. Some of the trails already exist while others
represent potential linkages. This project provides a funding mechanism to acquire and construct the trail system per the Master Plan. Anticipated Environmental Review: To be Reviewed
as Individual Trail Segments are Developed Project Number: CMP00F Department/District: Parks & Recreation Location: Various Locations General Plan Consistency: Implementation of the
Recreation Trails Master Plan will further Recreation and Circulation Element policies to "provide and maintain an inter-linking network of trails" (RE-2.2). 7-4
PARKS AND BEACHES FY2010-2015 Insert Photo Here Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan,
Design & Engineering 212,060 212,060 Land Purchase Construction Other Project Cost: 0 0 0 0 0 212,060 0 212,060 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project
FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY13/14 6 Years Total General Fund Development Impact Fees 212,060 212,060 Project Cost: 0 0 0 0 0 212,060 0 212,060 Project
Title: Standard Pacific Park Site Development Project Description: This new program will provide for the design and development of the Standard Pacific housing development park site.
It is anticipated that this 3.14 acre park will include facilities and equipment commonly found at neighborhood parks, such as children's play equipment, turf area and picnic facilities.
However, the type of facilities to be included at the site will be determined during the planning and design process, including community workshops. Project Justification: A significant
deficiency of park space exists in the project area as indicated in the City's General Plan and Technical Appendices. On January 21, 2009, the Council took action to earmark the “Park
Improvement Fees” received in conjunction for Case No. 06-111 and 06-112 (subdivision on Urania and Normandy) for the Standard Pacific park site development project. Anticipated Environmental
Review: TBD Project Number: CMP10A Department/District: Parks & Recreation Location: Olympus & Piraeus General Plan Consistency: General Plan Consistency: This project is consistent
with Recreation Element of the Plan, Policy RE-1.4, "Establish a balance of natural open space and "improved" recreational open space," Policy RE-1.11 The development of this site will
meet facility needs as identified in Policy 1.7 of the Recreation Element of the City's General Plan, which states that a City goal is to "provide a neighborhood park within convenient,
and and where possible, walking distance for all urban area residents" (R.E.-1.7). 7-5
This page is intentionally left blank 7-6
SUMMARY OF STREETS AND RAIL CORRIDOR PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Page Prior Beyond Project No. Project Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total 8-2 Annual Street
Overlay Program (CMS10A) Annual 1,100,000 1,150,000 1,200,000 1,260,000 1,320,000 1,380,000 7,410,000 8-3 North Coast Hwy. 101 Streetscape (CMS04D) 2,200,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
500,000 500,000 500,000 5,200,000 8-4 Leucadia Blvd. Improvements (I-5 to Vulcan) Phase II (CMS00D) 2,822,431 2,000,000 4,822,431 8-5 Safe Routes to Schools/Pathways Program (CMS01E)
1,798,535 504,814 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 3,303,349 8-6 Traffic Safety/Calming Improvements (less transfers out) (CMS02F) 906,272 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
150,000 1,806,272 8-7 Traffic Signal Modification (CMS02G) 417,340 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 717,340 8-8 Santa Fe Dr. (I-5 to MacKinnon Avenue) (CMS07B) 200,000 750,000
750,000 1,700,000 8-9 Improvements to the Leucadia Blvd/N. Coast Hwy 101/Vulcan Ave Intersection (CMS08C) 751,290 750,000 1,501,290 8-10 La Costa Avenue Widening (TBD) 375,000 3,625,000
4,000,000 8-11 Encinitas/NCTD Transit Parking Lot(CMS09E) 40,000 1,280,000 1,320,000 Project Totals 9,135,868 4,334,814 2,050,000 2,475,000 4,160,000 2,970,000 3,030,000 3,625,000 31,780,682
Page Prior Beyond Project No. Project Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total TransNet 7,668,220 2,130,000 1,200,000 1,250,000 1,310,000 1,420,000 1,530,000
16,508,220 Traffic Mitigation 630,000 750,000 375,000 2,000,000 750,000 750,000 3,625,000 8,880,000 CDBG Fund 504,814 504,814 CDBG-R Fund 94,927 94,927 ELLD 72,389 72,389 Prop 1B/Prop
42 State Funds 950,000 850,000 850,000 850,000 800,000 750,000 5,050,000 TDA Transportation Development Act 179,042 179,042 Federal Grants (SAFETEA-LU) 451,290 451,290 Other 40,000 40,000
Project Totals 9,135,868 4,334,814 2,050,000 2,475,000 4,160,000 2,970,000 3,030,000 3,625,000 31,780,682 8-1
STREETS AND RAIL CORRIDOR PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan,
Design & Engineering Land Purchase Construction Annual 1,100,000 1,150,000 1,200,000 1,260,000 1,320,000 1,380,000 Ongoing 7,410,000 Other Project Cost: 0 1,100,000 1,150,000 1,200,000
1,260,000 1,320,000 1,380,000 7,410,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15
6 Years Total TransNet Annual 150,000 300,000 350,000 410,000 520,000 630,000 Ongoing 2,360,000 Prop 1B/42 203 State Grant Fund 950,000 850,000 850,000 850,000 800,000 750,000 5,050,000
Project Cost: 0 1,100,000 1,150,000 1,200,000 1,260,000 1,320,000 1,380,000 7,410,000 Project Title: Annual Street Overlay Program Project Description: This project will include the
overlay and pavement surface treatment of various streets throughout the City. Precise locations will be determined annually in accordance with the Pavement Rehabilitation Study. Project
Justification: This project helps maintain existing levels of service and reduces reconstruction costs that would be incurred from inadequately maintained roads. Anticipated Environmental
Review: Categorical Exemption Art. 19, Section 15301(c) Project Number: CMS10A Department/District: Engineering Services Location: Citywide General Plan Consistency: General Plan Policy
CE-1.19 states, "The City will provide for adequate levels of maintenance of all improved components of the circulation systems, such as roadways…" 8-2
STREETS AND RAIL CORRIDOR PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan,
Design & Engineering 500,000 500,000 Land Purchase Construction 1,700,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 TBD 4,700,000 Other Project Cost: 2,200,000 500,000 500,000
500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 5,200,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: TBD once project scope is defined SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11
FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total TransNet 2,200,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 TBD 5,200,000 Project Cost: 2,200,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
500,000 500,000 5,200,000 Project Title: North Coast Highway 101 Streetscape Project Description: This project provides funding for planning, design, & construction of streetscape improvements
along N. Coast Highway 101 from A St. to La Costa Avenue. Initial phase will focus on developing streetscape concepts and construction of improvements from A Street to North Court. Project
Justification: There is a need to address vehicular and pedestrian safety concerns through comprehensive planning and design of future streetscape improvements. Improvement of the coastal
corridor will enhance public safety and provide a more attractive environment for residents, visitors, and businesses. Anticipated Environmental Review: To be Determined by Initial Study
Project Number: CMS04D Department/District: Engineering Services & Planning & Building Location: North Coast Highway 101 from A St. to La Costa Avenue General Plan Consistency: This
project is supported by numerous General Plan policies including Land Use Element policies requiring the preparation of a streetscape plan for the 101 corridor (LU-7.5), developing standards
that will help "revitalize the commercial corridor" (LU-7.9), and to develop a transportation system that is "safe, convenient...and sensitive to and compatible with surrounding community
character" (C-1). 8-3
STREETS AND RAIL CORRIDOR PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan,
Design & Engineering 60,000 60,000 Land Purchase 25,000 25,000 Construction 2,665,042 2,000,000 4,665,042 Lighting and Landscape 72,389 72,389 Project Cost: 2,822,431 0 0 0 2,000,000
0 0 4,822,431 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: 0 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 0 210,000 SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13
FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total TDA Grant 179,042 179,042 Traffic Mitigation 1,650,000 2,000,000 3,650,000 Return to Traffic Mitigation Fund Bal (1,650,000) (1,650,000) TransNet 921,000
921,000 Transfer from Transnet Fund Balance 1,650,000 1,650,000 ELLD 72,389 72,389 Project Cost: 2,822,431 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 4,822,431 Project Title: Leucadia Blvd. Improvements (I-5
to Vulcan) -Phase II Project Description: This project will involve minor widening from I-5 to Coast Hwy. 101 to accommodate bike lanes and may include other improvements (medians, decorative
street lights, etc.) pending public input at community character workshops. This project also includes the installation of turn lanes on Vulcan Avenue at Leucadia Boulevard. Phase I
to be constructed in FY07-08, includes roundabouts at Hermes Avenue and Hymettus Avenue. Phase II includes the construction of a roundabout at Hygeia Avenue. Project Justification: Leucadia
Boulevard is a vital, highly traveled, east-west corridor through the City. The proposed project to Leucadia Blvd., from I-5 to Coast Hwy. 101, will finalize improvements to this corridor
and complete the last link of bike lanes reaching from Olivenhain Road to Coast Hwy. 101. Anticipated Environmental Review: To be Determined by Initial Environmental Assessment Project
Number: CMS00D Department/District: Engineering Services/Planning and Building Location: Leucadia Boulevard Improvements West of I-5 General Plan Consistency: This project is consistent
with Goal 3 of the Circulation Element of the General Plan which states, "The City will promote the use of other modes of transport to reduce dependence on the personal automobile, "
and Policy C-3.11, "The City will strive to implement a safe, direct, and convenient circulation system for...bicycle traffic...All Circulation Element roads will include provisions
for bicycle lanes..." 8-4
STREETS AND RAIL CORRIDOR PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies 50,000
50,000 Plan, Design & Engineering 235,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Ongoing 360,000 Land Purchase Construction 1,513,535 504,814 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 2,893,349
Other Project Cost: 1,798,535 504,814 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 3,303,349 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations
FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total TransNet 1,642,744 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Ongoing 2,642,744 TransNet (Regal Road CMS10D) 40,864 40,864
CDBG (Regal Road CMS10D) 57,436 57,436 CDBG (Melba Rd CMS10B) 197,073 197,073 CDBG-R (Melba Road CMS10B) 94,927 94,927 CDBG (Citywide Sidewalk Repl CMS10C) 250,305 250,305 Developer
Contribution 20,000 20,000 Project Cost: 1,798,535 504,814 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 3,303,349 Project Title: Safe Routes to Schools/Pathways Program Project Description:
These funds are intended to serve as a match for any Safe Routes to Schools grant monies awarded to the City. Safe Routes to Schools is a program designed to provide sidewalks in the
vicinity of City Schools. Also included in this project are other various proposed sidewalk projects throughout the City. Project Justification: AB1475 directed Caltrans to use Federal
Highway
Administration safety funds to develop safe routes to schools. The City will aggressively pursue this grant opportunity and similar grant funds. Other sidewalk projects are included,
as requested by citizens, to provide a safe walking environment for pedestrians. Anticipated Environmental Review: TBD By Initial Environmental Study Project Number: CMS01E Department/District:
Engineering Services Location: Various Locations General Plan Consistency: The City will "create a safe and convenient circulation system for pedestrians," (C.E. Policy 3.3) and "A program
shall be developed to install sidewalks or paths, where appropriate, around schools…where public safety or welfare is an issue," (C.E. Policy 3.8). 8-5
STREETS AND RAIL CORRIDOR PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies 35,000
5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Ongoing 65,000 Plan, Design & Engineering 100,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 190,000 Land Purchase Construction 771,272 130,000 130,000
130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 1,551,272 Other Project Cost: 906,272 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,806,272 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior
Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total TransNet (204) 726,272 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Ongoing
1,626,272 Traffic Mitigation Fees (233) 180,000 180,000 Project Cost: 906,272 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 1,806,272 Project Title: Traffic Safety/Calming Improvements
Project Description: This project includes the implementation of the Encinitas Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (ENTMP). The pilot program encompasses areas of Rubenstein, Summit
and Westminster in the Cardiff community. Project Justification: This project will address vehicle and pedestrian safety concerns by providing safety improvements and traffic calming
features on problematic streets. This project will also provide improved levels-of-service and safety at intersections through the purchase and use of newer traffic management technology.
Anticipated Environmental Review: Most Improvements will be categorically exempt from environmental review Project Number: CMS02F Department/District: Engineering Services Location:
Various Locations General Plan Consistency: Goal 1 of the Circulation Element states, "Encinitas should have a transportation system that is safe, convenient and efficient…" Policy 1.14
states, "A coordinated traffic signal system shall be developed and implemented." 8-6
STREETS AND RAIL CORRIDOR PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan,
Design & Engineering Ongoing 0 Land Purchase Construction 0 Other 417,340 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 717,340 Project Cost: 417,340 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
717,340 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total TransNet 397,340
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Ongoing 697,340 Lion's Club Donation 20,000 20,000 Project Cost: 417,340 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 717,340 Project Title: Traffic
Signal Modifications (Phasing, Timing and Synchronization) Project Description: This project includes the implementation of traffic safety improvements including as-needed signal phasing
and timing modifications, traffic signal interconnect, phone-drop communication to traffic signals, video detection, and contract services for the City's traffic management computer
system. Also includes the upgrade of yellow incandescent vehicle indicators to more costeffective traffic lamps using light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and the upgrade of countdown pedestrian
modules at ten intersections along with two audible pedestrian systems per year. Project Justification: This project will improve traffic circulation and air quality by optimizing efficiency
on the City's roadways. Anticipated Environmental Review: Exempt Project Number: CMS02G Department/District: Engineering Services Location: Various Locations General Plan Consistency:
Goal 1 of the Circulation Element states, "Encinitas should have a transportation system that is safe, convenient and efficient…" Policy 1.14 states, "A coordinated traffic signal system
shall be developed and implemented." 8-7
STREETS AND RAIL CORRIDOR PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan,
Design & Engineering 200,000 200,000 Land Purchase Construction 750,000 750,000 1,500,000 Other Project Cost: 200,000 0 0 0 0 750,000 750,000 1,700,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense:
N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total TransNet 0 Traffic Mitigation Fees 200,000 750,000 750,000
1,700,000 Project Cost: 200,000 0 0 0 0 750,000 750,000 1,700,000 Project Title: Santa Fe Drive-I-5 to MacKinnon Improvements Project Description: This project will involve minor widening
from I-5 to MacKinnon to accommodate bike lanes and may include other improvements (medians, decorative street lights, etc.) pending public input at community character workshops. This
project will be designed and constructed in conjunction with the proposed Hall Property Community Park. Project Justification: Santa Fe Road is a vital, highly traveled, east-west corridor
through the City. The proposed project to Santa Fe Road, from I-5 to MacKinnon, will provide improvements to this corridor, which is part of the link of a bike lane that will eventually
reach from El Camino Real to Vulcan Avenue. Anticipated Environmental Review: Mitigated Negative Declaration Project Number: CMS07B Department/District: Engineering Services Location:
Santa Fe Drive from I-5 to MacKinnon General Plan Consistency: This project is consistent with Goal 3 of the Circulation Element of the General Plan which states, "The City will promote
the use of other modes of transport to reduce dependence on the personal automobile, " and Policy C-3.11, "The City will strive to implement a safe, direct, and convenient circulation
system for...bicycle traffic...All Circulation Element roads will include provisions for bicycle lanes..." 8-8
STREETS AND RAIL CORRIDOR PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan,
Design & Engineering 300,000 300,000 Land Purchase Construction 451,290 750,000 1,201,290 Other Project Cost: 751,290 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,501,290 Anticipated Future Operating Expense:
N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total TransNet 50,000 50,000 Traffic Mitigation Fees 250,000 750,000
1,000,000 Federal SAFETEA-LU Grant 451,290 451,290 Project Cost: 751,290 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,501,290 Project Title: Improvements to the Leucadia Blvd/N. Coast Hwy 101/Vulcan Ave Intersection
Project Description: This project will provide curb and gutter on both sides of Leucadia Blvd. between Coast Hwy. 101 and Vulcan Ave. and will also provide a 2' wide median and concrete
sidewalk on the north side of Leucadia Blvd. Advance pre-emption will also be part of this project allowing more time for direction of approaching trains. Project Justification: The
railroad crossing at Leucadia Blvd. is in need of modernization and safety improvements. This project will improve channelization of traffic and provide safer pedestrian crossing along
with a new detectino system for approaching rail traffic. Anticipated Environmental Review: Mitigated Negative Declaration Project Number: CMS08C Department/District: Engineering Services
Location: Intersection of Leucadia Blvd/N. Coast Hwy 101/Vulcan Avenue General Plan Consistency: Policy 1.5 states "Promote maximum utilization or expansion of prime arterials…" Policy
1.2 states" endeavor to maintain Level of Service C as a basic design guideline…" Policy 2.18 states "where possible functioning of the street system should be improved by the installation
of intersection improvements." 8-9
STREETS AND RAIL CORRIDOR PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan,
Design & Engineering 375,000 375,000 Land Purchase Construction 3,625,000 3,625,000 Other Project Cost: 0 0 0 375,000 0 0 0 3,625,000 4,000,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense:
N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Traffic Mitigation 375,000 3,625,000 4,000,000 Project Cost:
0 0 0 375,000 0 0 0 3,625,000 4,000,000 Project Title: La Costa Avenue Widening Project Description: This is a cooperative City of Encinitas and City of Carlsbad project involving the
widening of La Costa Avenue and the removal and replacement of the bridge across the railroad tracks. The proposed improvements will result in two 11 foot eastbound and two 11 foot westbound
lanes and bicycle lanes. Design and reconstruction cost will be shared by both cities. Project Justification: This project is needed to accommodate increasing volumes caused by development
in the Ponto Beach area of Carlsbad and will improve the level of service at the intersection. The existing street width and intersection with N. Coast Hwy 101 cannot handle the projected
increase in traffic volumes caused by the development. Anticipated Environmental Review: Categorical Exemption Art. 19, Section 15301(c) Project Number: TBD Department/District: Engineering
Services Location: La Costa Avenue from Interstate 5 to N. Coast Hwy. 101 General Plan Consistency: Policy 1.5 states "Promote maximum utilization or expansion of prime arterials…" Policy
1.2 states" endeavor to maintain Level of Service C as a basic design guideline…" Policy 2.18 states "where possible functioning of the street system should be improved by the installation
of intersection improvements." 8-10
STREETS AND RAIL CORRIDOR PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Design 40,000 80,000 120,000
Construction 1,200,000 1,200,000 Project Cost: 40,000 1,280,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,320,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations
FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total TransNet 40,000 1,280,000 1,320,000 General Fund 0 Project Cost: 40,000 1,280,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,320,000 Project Title: Encinitas/NCTD
Transit Parking Lot (Parking Lot B) Project Description: This project includes the construction of an approximately 121 space parking lot within existing City and NCTD right-of-way.
Project also includes concrete curbing, paving, retaining walls, landscaping, irrigation, lighting, and bicycle enclosures. Project Justification: There is an immediate need for parking
because of current parking demands from the transit center and downtown business district. district. Anticipated Environmental Review: Categorical Exemption Project Number: CMS09E Department/District
: Engineering Location: Southwest Corner of E Street and Vulcan Avenue General Plan Consistency: This project is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, Policy CE-1.15
"The City will actively support an integrated transportation program that encourages masstransit, bicycle transportation,..." and will be carried out in conformance with applicable development
standards and design recommendations of the Downtown Encinitas Specific Plan. 8-11
This page is intentionally left blank. 8-12
SUMMARY OF WATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Page Prior Beyond Project No. Project Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total 9-2 Water Distribution Line Upgrades (CWW10A)
Annual 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Annual Project 2,100,000 9-3 Badger Plant Capital Acquisitions (CWW10B) Annual 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Annual
Project 240,000 9-4 Water Valve Replacement (CWW10C) Annual 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Annual Project 1,500,000 9-5 R.E. Badger CIP (CWW10N) Annual 550,000 1,450,000
975,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 Annual Project 5,900,000 9-6 Meter Replacement and Automated Program (CWW10E) Annual 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Annual Project 600,000
9-7 Fire Hydrants Installation (CWW08I) 150,000 75,000 75,000 300,000 9-8 Transmission Lines Motorized Actuators (CWW01A) 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 SDWD Rate Study
Update (CWW10J) (Work Plan) 0 9-9 R.E. Badger Master Plan (TBD) 124,000 124,000 SDWD Master Plan Update (CWW09H) (Work Plan) 0 9-10 Anode Bed Replacement (CWW10L) 165,000 165,000 SDWD
Drought Allocation Study (CWW10M) (Work Plan) 0 Project Total (Water Projects) 250,000 1,630,000 2,489,000 1,815,000 1,815,000 1,715,000 1,715,000 11,429,000 Project Total (Water Projects
& Work Projects) 400,000 1,840,000 2,489,000 1,915,000 1,815,000 1,715,000 1,815,000 11,839,000 Prior Beyond Funding Project Funding Sources Appr. FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14
FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Replacement Fund 250,000 1,630,000 2,489,000 1,815,000 1,815,000 1,715,000 1,715,000 11,429,000 Project Total 250,000 1,630,000 2,489,000 1,815,000 1,815,000
1,715,000 1,715,000 11,429,000 9-1
WATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan, Design & Engineering
Land Purchase Annual Annual Construction Project 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Project 2,100,000 Other Project Cost: 0 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000
2,100,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Replacement
Fund Annual 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Annual 2,100,000 Project Project Project Cost: 0 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 2,100,000 Project Title:
Water Distribution Line Upgrades Project Description: FY 09/10: HP-15 Replace 6” pipeline with 8” (800/ft) in Sheridan Rd. north of La Costa. HP-17 Replace 6" pipeline with 8" pipeline
(567/ft) in Oceanic Dr. south of Melba Rd. LP-3 Replace 6” pipeline with 8” (758/ft) in Montgomery Av. from Kilkenny Av. to cul-de-sac. FY 10/11: HP-21 Replace 6" pipeline with 8" pipeline
(1,000/ft) in Seeman Dr. LP-4 Replace 6” pipeline with 8” (765/ft) in La Mesa Av. from El Portal St. to the cul-de-sac. FY 11/12: LP-6 Replace 6" pipeline with 8" pipeline adjacent to
Crest Dr. north of intersection of Crest Dr./Santa Fe Dr. LP-9 Replace 6” pipeline with 8” (850/ft) in Parkwood Ln. west of Eolus Avenue. FY 12/13: Future Projects to be determined by
update to Master Plan. FY 13/14: Future Projects to be determined by update to Master Plan. FY 14/15: Future Projects to be determined by update to Master Plan. Project Justification:
Water Master Plan recommends increase of pipeline size in order to meet current fire flow requirements. Anticipated Environmental Review: Environmental Initial Assessment in Conjunction
with Water Master Plan Project Number: CWW10A Department/District: San Dieguito Water District Location: See Project Description General Plan Consistency: Supply of potable drinking
water is a fundamental responsibility of the District, and is supported in the City's General Plan by RM-1 to, "conserve, protect, and enhance the water resources in the Planning Area,"
and PS-2 which states, "The City of Encinitas will make an effort to minimize potential hazards to public health safety, and welfare." 9-2
WATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Last year's Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan, Design & Engineering
Land Purchase Construction Annual Other Annual 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Project 240,000 Project Cost: Annual 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 240,000 Anticipated
Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Last year's Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Replacement Fund Annual 40,000
40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Annual 240,000 Project Project Cost: Annual 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 240,000 Project Title: Badger Plant Capital Acquisitions Project
Description: Each year, the R.E. Badger Plant has scheduled Capital upgrades and purchases. The Capital costs vary and are not include in the 6-Year CIP process. These projects include
large valve replacement, SCADA upgrades, misc. plant improvements, vehicle replacement, etc. This continuing project will pay for these minor capital improvements as they occur. Project
Justification: Currently, there is no separate account or fund for minor Badger projects that are not planned as part of the CIP process. However, they occur often enough that it is
necessary to have an open on-going project for them. Otherwise, they would be funded out of the SDWD Operating Budget. This is not encouraged since it leads to distortion of actual treatment
costs. Project costs are shared with Santa Fe Irrigation District. Anticipated Environmental Review: Categorical Exemption Section 15301 Project Number: CWW10B Department/District: San
Dieguito Water District Location: Badger Filtration Plant General Plan Consistency: Supply of potable drinking water is a fundamental responsibility of the District, and is supported
in the City's General Plan by RM-1 to, "conserve, protect, and enhance the water resources in the Planning Area."9-3
WATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan, Design & Engineering
Land Purchase Annual Annual Construction Project 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Project 1,500,000 Other Project Cost: 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 100,000 250,000
1,500,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Replacement
Fund Annual 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Annual 1,500,000 Project Project Project Cost: 0 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 100,000 250,000 1,500,000 Project Title:
Water Valve Replacements Project Description: This project involves replacing approximately 600-700 water isolation valves of various sizes and locations throughout the District over
a several year period. Project Justification: The valves that will be replaced through this project project are those that are old, corrosive, and no longer seal correctly. Replacement
of broken valves provides assurance that valves will operate when needed. If not replaced, District personnel will continue to experience operational inefficiencies and customer's water
services may be impacted (Water Master Plan No. HP-4). Anticipated Environmental Review: Environmental Initial Assessment in conjunction with Water Master Plan Project Number: CWW10C
Department/District: San Dieguito Water District Location: Various Locations General Plan Consistency: Supply of potable drinking water is a fundamental responsibility of the District,
and is supported in the City's General Plan by RM-1 to, "conserve, protect, and enhance the water resources in the Planning Area." 9-4
WATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan, Design & Engineering
Land Purchase Construction Annual 550,000 1,450,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 Ongoing 5,900,000 Other Project Cost: 0 550,000 1,450,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 5,900,000
Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Replacement Fund
Annual 550,000 1,450,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 Ongoing 5,900,000 Project Cost: 0 550,000 1,450,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 5,900,000 Project Title: R.E. Badger Plant
Master Plan Projects Project Description: The Badger Master Plan recommends several projects. Each year projects will be defined in the Badger budget process. FY 09/10: Disinfection
Improvements, Utility Upgrade Project. FY 10/11: Plant Electrical Improvements, SDR Pump Station Relocation and Upgrades. FY 11/12: Complete the SDR Pump Station Relocation and Upgrades.
Project Justification: The Badger Master Plan recommends projects to the existing water treatment processes to achieve compliance with current and foreseeable future water quality and
water treatment regulations. Projects costs are shared with Santa Fe Irrigation District. Anticipated Environmental Review: Environmental Initial Assessment in Conjunction with Badger
Master Plan Project Number: CWW10N Department/District: San Dieguito Water District Location: Badger Filtration Plant General Plan Consistency: Supply of potable drinking water is a
fundamental responsibility of the District, and is supported in the City's General Plan by RM-1 to, "conserve, protect, and enhance the water resources in the Planning Area." 9-5
WATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan, Design & Engineering
Land Purchase Construction Annual Project 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Annual Project 600,000 Other Project Cost: 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
600,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Replacement
Fund Annual Project 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Annual 600,000 Project Project Cost: 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Project Title: Meter
Replacement and Automation Project Description: This project will provide for the ongoing replacement of older water meters and transponders throughout the entire District. Project Justification:
American Water Works Association studies have shown that meters between 12 to 18 years in age have a tendency to under-register the amount of water actually being used. Providing an
ongoing meter replacement program will result in more accurate meter readings. Anticipated Environmental Review: Categorical Exemption Art. 19, Section 15302(c) Project Number: CWW10E
Department/District: San Dieguito Water District Location: Various Locations General Plan Consistency: Supply of potable drinking water is a fundamental responsibility of the District,
and is supported in the City's General Plan by RM-1 to, "conserve, protect, and enhance the water resources in the Planning Area," and PS-2 which states, "The City of Encinitas will
make an effort to minimize potential hazards to public health safety, and welfare." 9-6
WATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan, Design & Engineering
Land Purchase Construction 150,000 75,000 75,000 300,000 Other Project Cost: 150,000 75,000 75,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond
Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FH11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Replacement Fund 150,000 75,000 75,000 300,000 Project Cost: 150,000 75,000 75,000 0
0 0 0 300,000 Project Title: Fire Hydrant Installation Projects Project Description: This project involves installation of approximately 100-150 new fire hydrants in various older established
areas including residential and non-residential over a several year period. Project Justification: The Water Master Plan recommends increased fire protection in older established area
by meeting spacing requirements between fire hydrants (Master Plan Project No. HP-5). Anticipated Environmental Review: Initial Environmental Assessment in Conjunction with Water Master
Project Number: CWW08I Department/District: San Dieguito Water District Location: Various Locations General Plan Consistency: Supply of potable drinking water is a fundamental responsibility
of the District, and is supported in the City's General Plan by RM-1 to, "conserve, protect, and enhance the water resources in the Planning Area," and PS-2 which states, "The City of
Encinitas will make an effort to minimize potential hazards to public health safety, and welfare." 9-7
WATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan, Design & Engineering
Land Purchase Construction 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Other Project Cost: 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 500,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense:
$500/year SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Replacement Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
100,000 500,000 Project Cost: 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 500,000 Project Title: Motorized Actuators for Transmission Lines Project Description: Installation of 16 motorized
actuators to the existing 24" and 30" transmission valves located within vaults. Project Justification: This project will allow operations personnel to control the on/off positions of
the valves without entering the vaults. It will also eliminate the need for complex traffic control and confined space requirements and allow quick control of the valves, which is critical
during emergency situations. Anticipated Environmental Review: Categorical Exemption Art. 19, Section 15302(c) Project Number: CWW01A Department/District: San Dieguito Water District
Location: Various Locations General Plan Consistency: Supply of potable drinking water is a fundamental responsibility of the District, and is supported in the City's General Plan by
RM-1 to, "conserve, protect, and enhance the water resources in the Planning Area," and PS-2 which states, "The City of Encinitas will make an effort to minimize potential hazards to
public health safety, and welfare." 9-8
WATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies 124,000 124,000 Plan, Design
& Engineering Land Purchase Construction Other Project Cost: 0 0 124,000 0 0 0 0 124,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project FUNDS: Appropriations
FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Replacement Fund 124,000 124,000 Project Cost: 0 0 124,000 0 0 0 0 124,000 Project Title: R.E. Badger Plant Master
Plan Project Description: Consultant services to establish the R.E. Badger Master Plan. The Master Plan will set recommendations on projects to be completed by SDWD and SFID. Project
Justification: The R.E. Badger Master Plan recommends projects to the existing water treatment processes to achieve compliance with current and foreseeable future water quality and water
treatment regulations. Projects costs are shared with Santa Fe Irrigation District. Anticipated Anticipated Environmental Review: Environmental Initial Assessment in Conjunction with
Badger Master Plan Project Number: TBD Department/District: San Dieguito Water District Location: Badger Filtration Plant General Plan Consistency: Supply of potable drinking water is
a fundamental responsibility of the District, and is supported in the City's General Plan by RM-1 to, "conserve, protect, and enhance the water resources in the Planning Area." 9-9
WATER PROJECTS FY2010-2015 Prior Year Beyond Project COSTS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total Consultants/Studies Plan, Design & Engineering
10,000 10,000 Land Purchase Construction 155,000 155,000 Other Project Cost: 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 165,000 Anticipated Future Operating Expense: N/A SOURCE OF Prior Year Beyond Project
FUNDS: Appropriations FY09/10 FY10/11 FY11/12 FY12/13 FY13/14 FY14/15 6 Years Total SDWD Replacement Fund 165,000 165,000 Project Cost: 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 165,000 Project Title: Anode
Bed Replacement
Project Description: Replacement of three existing cathodic deep anode beds that have deteriorated and no longer provide adequate corrosion protection to the District's 36-inch steel
transmission main. Project Justification: Cathodic protection is used to control the corrosion of buried steel water pipelines. Installing sacrificial anodes has been demonstrated to
be a cost-effective way to extend the useful life of metal pipeline structures. Anticipated Environmental Review: Categorical Exemption Art. 19, Section 15302(c) Project Number: CWW10L
Department/District: San Dieguito Water District Location: Three locations including 580 Balour Drive, 1302 Encinitas Boulevard and 230 Rancho Santa Fe Road. General Plan Consistency:
Supply of potable drinking water is a fundamental responsibility of the District, and is supported in the City's General Plan by RM-1 to, "conserve, protect, and enhance the water resources
in the Planning Area," and PS-2 which states, "The City of Encinitas will make an effort to minimize potential hazards to public health safety, and welfare." 9-10
Future Additional Funding as of Programmed Funding PROJECTS Source July 1, 2009 Funding Needed Total Cost Consultant Services and Studies and Other Work Projects (Not Capital) Call-based
Community Notification System IT 0 0 TBD TBD GIS Information Access to Citizens IT 0 0 50,000 50,000 Housing Element Implementation Planning 0 0 TBD TBD Model Trails for Maintenance
IT 0 0 26,000 26,000 iStreetView Update IT 0 0 52,000 52,000 H.T.E. Replacement IT 860,751 334,000 305,249 1,500,000 Category Subtotal 860,751 334,000 433,249 1,628,000 Drainage Leucadia
Long-Term Drainage Improvements Council Goal 0 0 50,000,000 50,000,000 Arroyo Drive Storm Drain Engineering 0 0 200,000 200,000 Cardiff Town Center Storm Drain Replacement* Engineering
20,000 0 TBD TBD 4th Street Storm Drain Engineering 505,700 0 394,300 900,000 Cottonwood Creek/2nd St. Drainage Improvements Engineering 300,000 0 2,000,000 2,300,000 Cottonwood Creek
Outfall Replacement Engineering 0 0 700,000 700,000 Category Subtotal 825,700 0 53,294,300 54,100,000 Wastewater NONE IDENTIFIED Category Subtotal 0 0 0 0 Facilities Secondary EOC Outfitting
(Public Works Facility) Public Works 0 0 60,000 60,000 (Generator Installation, video screens) Category Subtotal 0 0 60,000 60,000 Street and Rail Projects Annual Street Overlay Program
(Annual Contribution) CIP 1,100,000 0 1,900,000 3,000,000 North Coast Hwy. 101 Beautification Engineering 2,700,000 2,500,000 TBD TBD El Camino Widening and Median Improvements Engineering
0 0 5,425,000 5,425,000 (from Encinitas Boulevard to Mira Costa College) SUMMARY OF UNFUNDED/UNDERFUNDED CITY/DISTRICT CAPITAL AND WORK PROJECTS The following is a summary of projects
that are recommended in a Master Plan, the General Plan, or by a Board, Commission or Staff member. However, due to insufficient financial resources or lower prioritization at this time,
these projects are not proposed to be fully funded during the six year Capital Improvement Program Period. 10-1
SUMMARY OF UNFUNDED/UNDERFUNDED CITY/DISTRICT CAPITAL AND WORK PROJECTS Future Additional Funding as of Programmed Funding PROJECTS Source July 1, 2009 Funding Needed Total Cost Street
and Rail Projects Continued I-5 Interchange @Encinitas Boulevard Improvements** Engineering 1,330,000 20,300,000 30,270,000 51,900,000 Encinitas Boulevard Widening Study & Design CIP
200,000 0 550,000 750,000 Encinitas Boulevard Widening Construction CIP 0 7,350,000 7,350,000 Encinitas Boulevard/El Camino Real Intersection Improvements Traffic Mit Study 0 0 875,000
875,000 Manchester Avenue Alignment Engineering 200,000 0 0 200,000 La Costa Avenue Widening (City Share)*** General Plan 375,000 0 3,625,000 4,000,000 Downtown Streetscape Phase II
Improvements -Beautification Elements Council Goal 0 0 7,500,000 7,500,000 Vulcan Ave Sidewalks -Encinitas Blvd. to La Costa Engineering 0 0 3,000,000 3,000,000 Santa Fe Drive Widening
-Nardo Rd to Bonita Drive Engineering 200,000 1,500,000 TBD TBD Intersection Improvements -Westlake & Requeza St. Engineering 0 0 200,000 200,000 Quiet Zone at Chesterfield Engineering
0 0 750,000 750,000 Grade Separation Vehicular Crossing at Leucadia Boulevard Council Goal 0 0 160,000,000 160,000,000 Grade Separation Pedestrian Crossing at 4 Locations Council Goal
6,064,769 0 13,395,231 20,000,000 Category Subtotal 12,209,764 24,300,000 234,840,231 264,950,000 Parks and Beaches Moonlight Beach Design and Development Council Goal 397,774 0 3,602,226
4,000,000 Standard Pacific Park Design & Development P&R 0 212,060 1,287,940 1,500,000 Glen Park Scout House Rebuild (Design and Development) P&R 0 0 TBD TBD Hall Property Design and
Development Phase I Council Goal 11,987,754 2,600,000 7,087,246 21,675,000 Hall Property Development Phase II Council Goal 0 0 15,000,000 15,000,000 Swami's Restroom Replacement P&R
0 0 400,000 400,000 Beacon's Beach Access/Bluff Stabilization Council Goal 2,787,717 0 1,212,283 4,000,000 Playground Equipment Replacement (Annual Contribution) P&R 0 0 150,000 150,000
Category Subtotal Subtotal 15,173,245 2,812,060 28,739,695 46,725,000 Water NONE IDENTIFIED Category Subtotal 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 29,069,460 27,446,060 317,367,475 367,463,000 * Current funding
is for study to determined design alternatives. Construction costs unknown until design alternative is selected. ** Future programmed funding to be provided by Caltrans ***Joint project
with City of Carlsbad 10-2
PROJECT PROJECT BUDGET PROJECT BUDGET PROJECT BUDGET NUMBER PROJECT AS OF April 30, 2009 Appropriations FY2009-10 AS OF July 1, 2009 Consultant Services and Studies WFC00A CSA-17 Benefit
Fee $613,462 $0 $613,462 WFC08C FY07 SHSGP Equipment Grant $29,475 $0 $29,475 WFC09A FY07 SHSGP Training Grant $5,459 $0 $5,459 WFC09B FY07 Fire Prevention & Safety Grant $50,934 $0
$50,934 WFC10A Green Building Incentive Program $0 $10,000 $10,000 WMB06A ACOE Shoreline Protection Study $1,053,329 $0 $1,053,329 WMB08A Lagoon Monitoring Order No 2006-076 $2,665,394
$80,000 $2,745,394 WMB08B Sandag-Regional Beach and Sand Project $253,911 $187,411 $441,322 WMB08C SCOUP-Sand Compatibility Opportunistic $212,201 $17,180 $229,381 WMC00A Cardiff Specific
Plan $125,000 $0 $125,000 WMC01A GIS Basemap Updates and Enhancements $384,100 $82,500 $466,600 WMC01H COAST Implementation Plan $1,383,167 $0 $1,383,167 WMC02A Grade Separated Pedestrian
Crossing $6,604,769 $0 $6,604,769 WMC04C IT Systems Replacement Program $615,386 $0 $615,386 615,386 WMC04D City Engineering Design Manual $139,000 $0 $139,000 WMC06C NEA Grant Matching
Funds $27,600 $0 $27,600 WMC07A Mobile Home Park Study $45,000 $0 $45,000 WMC07D Operation Homecoming DVD $5,000 $0 $5,000 WMC08B GIS Data Access in the Field $141,920 $0 $141,920 WMC08C
iStreet View $52,023 $0 $52,023 WMC08D Cityworks for Fire $53,550 $0 $53,550 WMC08F Telephone System Replacement $500,000 $0 $500,000 WMC08G Community Enhancement-Mizel Donation $115,400
$0 $115,400 WMC08H City Wide Traffic Survey $20,000 $0 $20,000 WMC08I County Owned Site $47,500 $0 $47,500 WMC08K Open Space Management Plan $55,000 $0 $55,000 WMC09A Comprehensive General
Plan Update $471,658 $753,342 $1,225,000 WMC09B Development Processing & Impact Fee Study/Cost Allocation Plan Review $60,000 $0 $60,000 WMC09C H.T.E. Replacement $527,751 $333,000 $860,751
WMC09D Citywide Flood and Channel Maintenance Permitting Fee $41,000 $110,000 $151,000 WMC10A Technology Replacement Project $0 $144,500 $144,500 WMC10B Finance Studies (Fees and Liabilities)
$0 $60,000 $60,000 WMC10C Citywide ELLD Prop 218 Ballot $0 $50,000 $50,000 WMC10D Traffic Signals Red/Green LED Light Replacement $0 $28,800 $28,800 WMC95E Multi-Habitat Conserv Plan
$147,911 $0 $147,911 WMC95K Economic Development Plan $140,400 $0 $140,400 WMC97F Facade Improvement Program $150,000 $0 $150,000 WMD02A Cottonwood Creek Runoff Plan $41,575 $0 $41,575
WMP07B Cottonwood Creek Monitoring $30,000 $0 $30,000 Subtotal $16,808,875 $1,856,733 * $18,665,608 *SDWD Work Projects Listed under Water Projects Comprehensive List of All Active Capital
Improvement Projects July 1, 2009 11-1
PROJECT PROJECT BUDGET PROJECT BUDGET PROJECT BUDGET NUMBER PROJECT AS OF April 30, 2009 Appropriations FY2009-10 AS OF July 1, 2009 Comprehensive List of All Active Capital Improvement
Projects July 1, 2009 Drainage Projects CMD05E Storm Drain Repair $1,200,000 250,000 1,450,000 CMD06A 4th Street Storm Drain $505,700 $0 505,700 CMD06B Cottonwood Crk/2nd St Improv (Hwy
101/4th Street $300,000 $0 300,000 CMD06D El Camino Real Channel Storm Drain Repairs/Improvements $650,000 $0 650,000 CMD06E Lone Jack (Stratford Knoll) Channel Improvements $1,329,815
$0 1,329,815 CMD07C Manchester Ave @MiraCosta Drainage Improvements $56,902 $0 56,902 CMD09A Cardiff Town Center Storm Drain Replacement/Realignment $20,000 $0 20,000 CMD09B LaCosta
Slip Out $236,392 $0 $236,392 Subtotal $4,298,809 $250,000 $4,548,809 Emergency Storm Damage Projects CMX05D Emergency Repair of Recreational Trails $29,432 0 29,432 Subtotal $29,432
$0 $29,432 Wastewater Projects Cardiff Sanitary Division CCE04E CSD Collection System Rehabilitation Rehabilitation $1,213,945 $468,505 1,682,450 CCE04F Olivenhain Pump Station Upgrades/Replacement
$4,500,000 $0 4,500,000 CCE04G CSD Pump Station Upgrades $434,000 $0 434,000 CCE04H CSD Sewer Extension Program $102,432 $0 102,432 CCE04J Olivenhain Trunk Improvements $325,463 $200,000
525,463 CCE07B Somerset Main Replacement $392,496 $0 392,496 CCE07C Master Plan Update & I&I Study $132,600 $0 132,600 CCE09A SEJPA Plant Improvements FY09 $360,670 $0 360,670 CCE10A
SEJPA Plant Improvements FY10 $0 $388,698 $388,698 Subtotal CSD $7,461,606 $1,057,203 $8,518,809 Encinitas Sanitary Division Projects CEE04A ESD Share of CIPs at Batiquitos -2004 $919,286
$50,000 $969,286 CEE04H ESD Collection System Rehabilitation $2,534,436 $543,652 $3,078,088 CEE04K ESD Sewer Extension Program $53,091 $0 $53,091 CEE04M Encina Phase V $622,000 $0 $622,000
CEE07B Master Plan Update $110,911 $0 $110,911 CEE08B 2nd Street Sewer Main Repair $300,000 $0 $300,000 CEE09B Encina Plant Improvement FY09 $50,279 $0 $50,279 CEE10B Encina Plant Improvement
FY10 $0 $193,517 $193,517 Subtotal ESD $4,590,003 $787,169 $5,377,172 Subtotal CSD/ESD $12,051,609 $1,844,372 $13,895,981 11-2
PROJECT PROJECT BUDGET PROJECT BUDGET PROJECT BUDGET NUMBER PROJECT AS OF April 30, 2009 Appropriations FY2009-10 AS OF July 1, 2009 Comprehensive List of All Active Capital Improvement
Projects July 1, 2009 Public Facilities CFF04A Fire Station Rehabilitation (Master Project Fund) $7,459,078 $0 $7,459,078 CFF04B Fire Station #1 Rehabilitation $112,987 $0 $112,987 CFF04C
Fire Station #2 Rehabilitation $1,377,935 $0 $1,377,935 CFF04D Fire Station #3 Rehabilitation $4,550,000 $0 $4,550,000 CMF96B Library Development Fund -Library Savings returned to GF
$19,813,265 ($1,200,000) $18,613,265 CMF07B Civic Center Roof Replacement $3,560,000 $0 $3,560,000 CMF08B Gas Station Site@Vulcan & E St Improvements $45,000 $0 $45,000 CMF08D Boathouses
Acquisitions and Rehabilitation $841,250 $0 $841,250 CMF09A Civic Center Improvements FY09 $491,646 $0 $491,646 CFM09B Library Community Room AV Equipment $6,000 $34,000 $40,000 CMF10A
Civic Center Improvements FY10 $0 $170,000 $170,000 Subtotal $38,257,161 ($996,000) $37,261,161 Parks & Beaches CMP00F Recreational Trails Development Fund $485,000 $30,000 $515,000
CMP02D Hall Property Design & Development $10,987,754 $1,000,000 $11,987,754 CMP02F Beacon's Beach Access/Stairway $2,787,717 $0 $2,787,717 CMP04B Moonlight Beach Envir., Design and
Development $397,774 $0 $397,774 CMP04G Park Improvement Projects $808,750 $0 $808,750 CMP05A Habitat/Watershed/Open Space Acquisition $795,397 $110,000 $905,397 Subtotal $16,262,392
$1,140,000 $17,402,392 Street & Roads TBD*See WMC02A Grade Separated Pedestrian Crossing $0 $0 $0 CMS97B Encinitas Boulevard Alignment Study $200,000 $0 $200,000 CMS00D Leucadia Boulevard
Improvements (I-5 to Coast Hwy. 101) $2,822,431 $0 $2,822,431 CMS00T Olivenhain Road Widening $1,551,781 $0 $1,551,781 CMS01E Safe Routes to Schools/Pathways Program $1,798,535 $504,814
$2,303,349 CMS01J Coastal Rail Trail $1,541,829 $0 $1,541,829 CMS02F Traffic Safety/Calming Improvements $906,272 $150,000 $1,056,272 CMS02G Traffic Signal Modifications $407,340 $50,000
$457,340 457,340 CMS04B I-5 Interchange@Encinitas Boulevard $1,330,000 $0 $1,330,000 CMS04D North Coast Highway 101 Streetscape $2,200,000 $500,000 $2,700,000 CMS05C Underground Utility
District No. 12 $75,000 $0 $75,000 CMS07B Santa Fe Dr/I-5 Mackinnon Improvement $200,000 $0 $200,000 CMS07C ENTMP -1 Rubenstein/Summit/Westminster) $95,453 $0 $95,453 CMS07E Hale Study
-2004 $75,000 $0 $75,000 CMS08C Improvement to Leucadia Blvd/N.Coast Hwy101 $751,290 $750,000 $1,501,290 CMS08D Rail Quiet Zone @Chesterfield (Savings returned to GF) $750,000 ($750,000)
$0 CMS08E Santa Fe Alignment Study $200,000 $0 $200,000 CMS08F Cardiff Alley Improvements $100,000 $0 $100,000 11-3
PROJECT PROJECT BUDGET PROJECT BUDGET PROJECT BUDGET NUMBER PROJECT AS OF April 30, 2009 Appropriations FY2009-10 AS OF July 1, 2009 Comprehensive List of All Active Capital Improvement
Projects July 1, 2009 Street & Roads Continued $0 CMS08G Paul Ecke Elementary School Curbs, Gutters & Sidewalks $306,500 $0 $306,500 CMS09A FY2008-09 Annual Street Overlay $1,054,999
$0 $1,054,999 CMS09B Pavement Management Plan $100,000 $0 $100,000 CMS09C Manchester Ave Alignment Study $200,000 $0 $200,000 CMS09D Quail Gardens Dr Sound Wall $80,000 $0 $80,000 CMS09E
Encinitas/NCTD Transit Parking Lot $40,000 $1,280,000 $1,320,000 CMS09F Cardiff Elementary School Ped Improvements $651,390 $0 $651,390 CMS10A FY2009-10 Annual Street Overlay $0 $1,100,000
$1,100,000 Subtotal $17,437,820 $3,584,814 $21,022,634 Water Projects Work Projects CWW09H SDWD Master Plan Update $150,000 $60,000 $210,000 CWW10J SDWD Rate Study Update $0 $75,000
$75,000 CWW10M SDWD Drought Allocation Study $0 $75,000 $75,000 Subtotal $150,000 $210,000 $360,000 Capital Projects CWW98B Instrumentation, Telemetry $750,000 $0 $750,000 CWW01A Motorized
Actuators $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 CWW06F Security Upgrades $120,000 $0 $120,000 CWW08A FY08 Water Distribution Line Upgrades $935,503 $0 $935,503 CWW08C Water Valve Replacements $107,638
$0 $107,638 CWW08G Cathodic Protection/Transmission Lines $75,000 $0 $75,000 CWW08I Fire Hydrants Installation $150,000 $75,000 $225,000 CWW09A FY09 Water Distribution Line Upgrades
$250,000 $0 $250,000 CWW09B Badger Miscellaneous Plan Improvements $238,389 $0 $238,389 CWW09C Water Valve Replacements $100,000 $0 $100,000 CWW09D FY09 Badger Master Plan $317,731 $0
$317,731 CWW09E Meter Automation Program Phase II $352,883 $0 $352,883 CWW09F Saxony Rd Inter-connect with OMWD $265,000 $0 $265,000 CWW09K Arroyo Dr. PRV Stations $50,000 $0 $50,000
CWW10A FY10 Water Distribution Line Upgrades $0 $350,000 $350,000 CWW10B Badger Miscellaneous Plan Improvements $0 $40,000 $40,000 CWW10C Water Valve Replacements $0 $250,000 $250,000
CWW10E CWW10E Meter Automation Program $0 $100,000 $100,000 CWW10L Anode Bed Replacement $0 $165,000 $165,000 CWW10N R.E. Badger CIP $0 $550,000 $550,000 Subtotal $3,812,144 $1,630,000
$5,442,144 Subtotal SDWD Work Projects/CIP Projects $3,962,144 $1,840,000 $5,802,144 TOTAL $108,958,242 $9,519,919 $118,628,161 11-4
City of Encinitas Capital Improvement Program FY 2009-10 to 2014-15 CAPITAL PROJECT CATEGORIES PROJECT TOTALS FY09-10 FY10-11 Consultant Services and Studies -Chapter 3 $2,066,733 $1,010,211
Includes work projects, master plan preparation and special studies such as Technology Master Plan Implementation Cardiff Specific Plan, Information Technology Systems Replacement Project,
Cityworks Development and City-Wide Economic Development Strategy. Includes Consultant Studies for SDWD. Drainage Projects -Chapter 4 $250,000 $250,000 Includes localized and neighborhood
improvements in the Storm Drain Repair Fund. This category also includes the Cardiff Town Center Storm Drain Replacement/Realignment project and the Lone Jack (Stratford Knoll) Channel
Improvements project. Wastewater Projects -Chapter 5 $1,844,372 $2,276,188 Projects include treatment plant improvements and sewer main replacements. Public Facilities -Chapter 6 $204,000
$175,000 This project category includes the PW-Calle Magdalena Phase III, the Civic Center Roof Replacement, the Civic Center Improvements, and the Fire Station Rehabilitation Project.
Parks and Beach Projects -Chapter 7 $1,140,000 $415,000 Park and Beach projects include the Hall Property funding pool, parkland acquisition, habitat and open space acquisition, beach
sand replenishment program , and the Moonlight Beach Design and Development. Streets and Rail Corridor Projects -Chapter 8 $4,334,814 $2,050,000 This project category includes the annual
pavement overlay program, Downtown Streetscape Phase II and North Coast Highway 101 Streetscape, improvements to Santa Fe Drive and Leucadia Boulevard, the Safe Routes to Schools program
and other traffic calming and safety programs. Water Projects -Chapter 9 $1,630,000 $2,489,000 Includes projects within the San Dieguito Water District boundaries such as Badger plant
improvements, water distribution line upgrades, water valve replacements and new pipelines. Water Master Plan included in Consultant Studies Category. Total Category $11,469,919 11,469,919
$8,665,399 Less Return to GF from the Library and the Rail Quiet Zone Projects ($1,950,000) $0 $9,519,919 $8,665,399 12-1
12-2 Capital Improvement Projects by Category Fiscal Year 2009-10 Wastewater Projects $1,844,372 16% Public Facilities Projects $204,000 2% Parks and Beach Projects $1,140,000 10% Drainage
Projects $250,000 2% Consultant Services and Studies $2,066,733 17% Streets and Rail Corridor Projects $4,334,814 39% Water Projects $1,630,000 14% Total $11,469,919 Return to GF ($1,950,000)
Total FY10 $9,519,919
12-3 Capital Improvement Projects by Category Fiscal Year 2010-11 Consultant Services and Studies $1,010,211 12% Water Projects $2,489,000 28% Streets and Rail Corridor Projects $2,050,000
24% Parks and Beach Projects $415,000 5% Public Facilities Projects $175,000 2% Wastewater Projects $2,276,188 26% Drainage Projects $250,000 3% Total $8,665,399
City of Encinitas Capital Improvement Program FY 2009-10 to 2014-15 REVENUE SOURCES PROJECT TOTALS FY09-10 FY10-11 General Fund (101) * $737,342 $1,054,000 The General Fund accounts
for all discretionary financial resources. A broad range of municipal activities is provided through this fund including operating and capital projects. Projects are financed either
partially or completely with the City's General Fund. Projects with an asterisk indicatethere are other funding sources. Please review individual project sheets for total project costs
and funding sources. Many of the projects have prior year and subsequent funding beyond this six-year period. Special Projects Fund (119) $0 $0 The Special Projects Fund was established
to track the 2006 Proceeds of Bonds. A bond issuance of $20,000,000 resulted in $18,268,000 in proceeds. The bonds raised to fund the City Council's high priority capital projects including
the public works yard, fire station contruction projects and the phase 1 development of the former Hall property. Civic Center Improvements Fund (152) $170,000 $175,000 The Civic Center
Improvement Fund was established to collect rent from the various users of the facility, which then funds the debt service requirements (Fund 321) and pays for major maintenance and
improvements to common areas of the Civic Center. Federal Capital Grants (202) $0 $0 Projects in this category are funded with grants from other agencies. State Capital Grants (203)
$950,000 $850,000 Projects in this category are funded with grants from other agencies. Transnet Fund (204) * $2,130,000 $1,200,000 Transnet funds are derived from the San Diego County
Voter approved 20-year one-half cent transportation sales tax. These funds are limited to constructing, operating, and maintaining transportation facilities. TDA (Transportation Development
Act) Grant Fund (205) $0 $0 Projects in this category are funded with TDA Grant Funds allocated by SANDAG. Coastal Zone Management Fund (210) $204,591 $227,411 Projects in this category
are funded with 2% of TOT tax collected. Community Development Block Grant( 222), Affordable Housing(225), Housing Authority(226), & H.O.M.E. $504,814 $0 Community Development Block
Grant (CBDG) are federal funds that may be used for certain community development activities. The City conducts a separate allocation process each year to identify which projects will
receive these funds. Governmental/Educational Access Fund (228) $0 $0 Projects in this category are funded with monies received from cable communication companies. 12-4
Park Development Fees Fund (231) $150,000 $150,000 Park Development fees are collected from builders or developers for the purpose of defraying the cost of construction recreation facilities
in the vicinity of the new building or development. Flood Control Fees Fund (232) $50,000 $50,000 Flood Control fees are collected from builders or developers for the purpose of defraying
the cost of constructing drainage facilities within the vicinity of the new building or development. Flood Control Fees may be used only for the construction of local drainage facilities.
Traffic Mitigation Fees Fund (233) $750,000 $0 Traffic Mitigation Fees are collected from builders or developers for the purpose of defraying the cost of constructing street improvements.
Park Acquisition Fees Fund (234) $100,000 $100,000 Park Development fees are collected from builders or developers for the purpose of defraying the cost of constructing recreation facilities
in the vicinity of the new building or development. These funds may be used only for the acquisition of parkland or the construction of park improvements within the area from which the
fees were collected. Open Space Fund (235) $10,000 $15,000 Open Space impact fees are collected from builders or developers of residential property for the purpose of defraying the cost
of acquiring community assets of open space land. Fire Mitigation Fees Fund (272) $0 $0 Fire Mitigation Fees are collected from builders or developers for the purpose of defraying the
cost of constructing improvements necessary to maintain established service levels. Encinitas Lighting and Landscape District Fund (295) $78,800 $78,800 Encinitas Lighting and Landscape
District is a subsidiary district of the City. Revenues are derived through a comblination of property tax apportionment and benefit assessments. Cardiff Sanitary Division: Operating
(501), Replacement (502), Expansion (503), Debt Service (504), Reclamation (505), & Rate Stabilization (506) $1,057,203 $1,380,120 The projects that are financed with operating or replacement
funds are for improvements to or replacement of existing facilities. Expansion funds are used to finance improvements which expand the capacity of the sewer collection and treatment
systems and are derived from connection fees. Encinitas Sanitary Division: Operating (521), Replacement (522), Expansion (523), & Debt Service (524) $787,169 $896,068 In 1995, the District
was merged with the City and previous district funds are now contained in a separate City sanitary division. The projects that are financed with operating or replacement funds are for
improvements to or replacement of existing facilities. Expansion funds are used to finance improvements which expand the capacity of the sewer collection and treatment systems and are
derived from connection fees. San Dieguito Water District: Operating (531), Expansion (533), Replacement (534), & Rate Stabilization (535) Debt Service (536) $1,840,000 $2,489,000 The
projects that are financed with operating or replacement funds are for improvements improvements to or replacement of existing facilities. Expansion funds are used to finance improvements
that expand the capacity of the water distribution system and are derived from development impact fees. Total includes Water Master Plan that is Chapter 3, Consultant Services and Studies
(Work Projects). $9,519,919 $8,665,399 12-5
12-6 Capital Improvement Projects by Funding Source Fiscal Year 2009-10 San Dieguito Water District $1,840,000 19% Encinitas Sanitary Division $787,169 8% Cardiff Sanitary Division $1,057,203
11% General Fund $737,342 8% State Capital Grants $950,000 10% Civic Center Improvements $170,000 2% Transnet Fund $2,130,000 22% Coastal Zone Management Fund $204,591 2% Flood Control
Fees $50,000 1% Park Development Fees $150,000 2% Housing Funds and Grants $504,814 5% Traffic Mitigation Fees $750,000 8% Park Acquisition Fees $100,000 1% Open Space $10,000 0% Encinitas
Lighting and Landscape District $78,800 1% Total $9,519,919
12-7 Capital Improvement Projects by Funding Source Fiscal Year 2010-11 Flood Control Fees $50,000 1% Park Development Fees $150,000 2% State Capital Grants $850,000 10% Civic Center
Improvements $175,000 2% General Fund $1,054,000 12% Transnet Fund $1,200,000 14% Park Acquisition Fees $100,000 1% Open Space $15,000 0% Coastal Zone Management Fund $227,411 3% Encinitas
Lighting and Landscape District $78,800 1% Cardiff Sanitary Division $1,380,120 16% Encinitas Sanitary Division $896,068 10% San Dieguito Water District $2,489,000 28% Total $8,665,399
City of Encinitas Capital Improvement Program FY 2009-10 to 2014-15 PROJECTS BY TOTAL Page Projects Project Prior Year(s) Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond
Project No Number Appropriations FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 6 Years Total 8-2 Annual Street Overlay FY2009-10 CMS10A Annual 1,100,000 1,150,000 1,200,000 1,260,000
1,320,000 1,380,000 7,410,000 9-10 Anode Bed Replacement CWW10M 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 0 165,000 9-3 Badger Plant Capital Acquisitions CWW10B Annual 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
Annual 240,000 3-9 Citywide flood and Channel Maintenance Permitting Program WMD09D 41,000 110,000 0 0 0 0 0 151,000 3-10 Citywide Landscape and Lighting District Prop 218 Ballot WMC10C
0 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 6-2 Civic Center Improvements CMF10A Ongoing 170,000 175,000 180,000 185,000 190,000 195,000 Ongoing 1,095,000 3-5 Comprehensive General Plan Update WMC09A
471,658 753,342 125,000 0 0 0 0 1,350,000 5-5 CSD Master Plan Implementation Various 7,100,936 668,505 487,245 1,531,187 1,800,434 1,872,451 570,008 Ongoing 14,030,766 5-2 CSD Share
of CIP's at San Elijo (SEJPA) CCE10A 360,670 388,698 892,875 1,550,031 796,325 852,395 1,083,355 Ongoing 5,924,349 3-15 Digital Topography/GIS Basemap Updates and Enhancments WMC01A
384,100 82,500 0 30,000 0 30,000 0 526,600 8-11 Encinitas/NCTD Transit Parking Lot CMS09E 40,000 1,280,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,320,000 5-6 ESD Master Plan Implementation Various 2,698,438 543,652
559,962 576,760 594,063 617,826 642,539 Ongoing 6,233,240 5-3 ESD Share of Capital Improvements at Batiquitos Pump Station CEE04A 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Ongoing
350,000 5-4 ESD Share of CIP at Encina Treatment Plant CEE10B 49,352 193,517 286,106 264,607 192,009 200,356 209,033 Ongoing 1,394,980 3-2 Façade Improvement Incentive Program WMC97F
150,000 0 5,000 0 5,000 0 5,000 165,000 3-6 Finance Studies (Fees and Liabilities) WMC10B 0 60,000 0 60,000 0 60,000 0 180,000 9-7 Fire Hydrants Installation CWW08I 150,000 75,000 75,000
0 0 0 0 300,000 3-3 Green Building Incentive Program WMC10A 0 10,000 10,000 0 0 0 0 20,000 3-16 H.T.E. Replacement WMC09C 527,751 333,000 334,000 0 0 0 0 1,194,751 7-3 Habitat/Watershed/Open
Space Acquisition (Appropriations Less Transfers Out) CMP05A 795,397 110,000 115,000 130,000 135,000 140,000 150,000 Ongoing 1,575,397 7-2 Hall Property Environmental Review, Design
and Development CMP02D 10,987,754 1,000,000 300,000 200,000 375,000 725,000 1,000,000 7,087,246 21,675,000 8-9 Improvements to the Leucadia Blvd/N.Coast Hwy 101/Vulcan Ave Intersection
CMS08C 751,290 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,501,290 8-10 LaCosta Widening TBD 0 0 0 375,000 0 0 0 3,625,000 4,000,000 3-4 Lagoon Monitoring* WMB08A 2,665,394 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000
80,000 3,145,394 8-4 Leucadia Boulevard Improvments (I-5 to Vulcan) CMS00D 2,822,431 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 4,822,431 6-3 Library AV Room Equipment CMF09B 6,000 34,000 0 0 0 10,000 0 50,000
9-6 Meter Replacement and Automated Program CWW10E Annual 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Annual 600,000 8-3 North Coast Highway 101 Streetscape CMS04D 2,200,000 500,000
500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 5,200,000 9-5 R.E. Badger CIP CWW10N Annual 550,000
1,450,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 Annual 5,900,000 9-9 R.E. Badger Master Plan CWW10D 0 0 124,000 0 0 0 0 124,000 12-8
City of Encinitas Capital Improvement Program FY 2009-10 to 2014-15 PROJECTS BY TOTAL Page Projects Project Prior Year(s) Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Beyond
Project No Number Appropriations FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 6 Years Total 7-4 Recreational Trails Development Fund (Appropriations Less Transfers Out) CMP00F
485,000 30,000 0 30,000 0 30,000 0 Ongoing 575,000 8-5 Safe Route to Schools/Pathways Program CMS01E (CMS04E/02H) 1,798,535 504,814 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 3,303,349
3-8 Sand Compatibility Opportunistic Use Program (SCOUP) WMB08C 212,201 17,180 40,000 25,000 0 0 0 294,381 3-7 SANDAG-Regional Beach Sand Project II (RBSPII) WMB08B 253,911 187,411 187,411
0 0 0 0 628,733 8-8 Santa Fe Drive Improvements (I-5 to MacKinnon Ave.) CMS08D 200,000 0 0 0 0 750,000 750,000 1,700,000 3-13 SDWD Drought Allocation Study CWW10M 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0
75,000 3-14 SDWD Master Plan Update CWW09H 150,000 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 210,000 3-12 SDWD Rate Study Update CWW10J 0 75,000 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 275,000 7-5 Standard Pacific Park Site Development
CMP10A 0 0 0 0 0 212,060 0 Ongoing 212,060 4-2 Storm Drain Repair Fund CMD05E 1,200,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Ongoing 2,700,000 3-17 Technology Replacement
Project WMC10A 0 144,500 150,000 207,000 216,000 95,000 205,000 1,017,500 8-6 Traffic Safety/Calming Improvements (Less Transfers Out) CMS02F 906,272 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
150,000 150,000 1,806,272 8-7 Traffic Signal Modifications CMS02G 417,430 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 717,430 3-11 Traffic Signals Red and Green LED Light Replacement WMC10D
0 28,800 28,800 28,800 28,800 0 0 115,200 9-8 Transmission Lines Motorized Actuators CWW01A 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 500,000 9-2 Water Distribution Line Upgrades CWW10A
Annual 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Annual 2,100,000 9-4 Water Valve Replacements CWW10C Annual 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Annual 1,500,000 Adjustment
for Outside Funding Source for Lagoon Monitoring* (2,505,394) (1) (1) (2,505,396) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TOTALS 35,470,126 11,469,919 8,665,399 9,583,385 10,682,631 10,100,087 9,284,934
10,712,246 105,968,727 12-9
This page is intentionally left blank.
Goal # Issue FY2004-05 Goal FY2005/06-2006/07 Goal FY2007-08 Goal Status 2008-09 Commission Updates to Council Provide opportunities for Commissions to provide periodic updates to City
Council Commissioner Chairs are encouraged to provide Commission updates during the quarterly breakfast meetings with the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, and City Manager as well as provide updates/briefings
to Council. Complete. Continue and broaden. 2008-08 Evaluate and Update Administrative Policies Evaluate and Update Administrative Policies Council formed a two member subcommittee on
April 16, 2008 and conducted a public meeting July 16, 2008 identifying interest in particular administrative policies for consideration by the Council subcommittee. The Council subcommittee
and staff are developing work plan to accomplish goal. CITY CLERK CITY MANAGER (City Clerk & Human Resources) APPENDIX A Fiscal Years 04/05 through 08/09* CITY COUNCIL GOALS A-1
Goal # Issue FY2004-05 Goal FY2005/06-2006/07 Goal FY2007-08 Goal Status APPENDIX A Fiscal Years 04/05 through 08/09* CITY COUNCIL GOALS 2007-3 Downtown Parking: Evaluate Downtown parking
survey results when they are released. Contact NCTD to reengage discussions about he development of parking lot B 1. Evaluate Downtown parking survey results when they are released.
2. Contact NCTD to reengage discussions about he development of parking lot B 1. Parking study presented and workplan developed. Complete. 2. Bidding documents for construction of parking
lot B under development. CITY MANAGER A-2
Goal # Issue FY2004-05 Goal FY2005/06-2006/07 Goal FY2007-08 Goal Status APPENDIX A Fiscal Years 04/05 through 08/09* CITY COUNCIL GOALS 2004-1 Traffic Calming Implement plan Implement
Plan Implement plan. Continue with pilot project. Neighborhood assessment will be ongoing as requests are received for traffic calming. Rubenstein/Summit/Westminster Resident steering
committee formed to gauge neighborhood support and petition submitted in late 2007 with over 2/3 approval. Presentation to Traffic Commission occurred in February 2008 followed by recommendations
to Council for review and determination. Council approved Conceptual Design in June 2008. Traffic calming features are currently in design and expected to go to bid in Spring 2009. 2004-3
North Coast Hwy. 101 Plan Identify funding sources Promote the beautification of North Coast Highway 101 by developing a contractual partnership with the Leucadia 101 Mainstreet Association.
Develop a plan for the installation of temporary sidewalk and pedestrian facilities on N Coast Hwy. 101 Interim sidewalks complete. Begin planning process for No. Coast Hwy 101 street
scape design. Construction of interim sidewalks on North Coast Hwy 101 completed in January 2008. Consultant has developed alternative designs of the North Coast Hwy 101 plan. Three
public workshops have been held. Streetscape design process underway. 2004-9 Design Manual Publish the design manual Publish the design manual Publish the design manual First of three
sections are in final review process. Public and professional reviews are continuing for the remainder of draft manual. ENGINEERING A-3
Goal # Issue FY2004-05 Goal FY2005/06-2006/07 Goal FY2007-08 Goal Status APPENDIX A Fiscal Years 04/05 through 08/09* CITY COUNCIL GOALS 2004-12 Drainage Projects Develop plan for Cottonwood
Creek between 3rd & B and Leucadia drainage projects Develop program for implementation Develop long term drainage alternatives and possible funding mechanisms for Leucadia Develop long
term drainage alternatives and possible funding mechanisms for Leucadia Continue to search for State and federal funding alternatives to address Leucadia drainage projects. 2005-2 Leucadia
Blvd./Vulcan Ave./Coast Hwy. 101 Intersection Improvements Design improvements to improve safety/circulation at the Leucadia Blvd./Vulcan Ave./Coast Hwy. 101 Intersection Construction
of Leucadia Blvd improvements from I-5 to Vulcan Ave. Phase I is complete. Preliminary design of intersection improvements at Leucadia Blvd,. rail road crossing and Vulcan Ave. underway.
2006-1 I-5 Widening Actively coordinate with Caltrans and SANDAG on the expansion of Interstate 5 Manchester/I-5 Interchange project taken over by Caltrans. Interchange alternatives
have been completed for all interchanges within the City. Funding for I-5 widening has been pushed back by Caltrans to approx 2017 due to funding limitations. Alternative design and
environmental review process for the Encinitas Blvd. /I-5 interchange underway. 2008-01 Leucadia Blvd. atgrade railroad crossing alternatives Investigate Leucadia Blvd. atgrade railroad
crossing alternatives, possible funding sources, and potential for a rail quiet zone Minor curb, gutter and drainage improvements completed at or near rail crossing. Partial federal
funding for at-grade crossing safety improvements obtained. Coordinating with NCTD and Cal PUC to review potential for implementation of rail quiet zone at Leucadia Blvd. FINANCE A-4
Goal # Issue FY2004-05 Goal FY2005/06-2006/07 Goal FY2007-08 Goal Status APPENDIX A Fiscal Years 04/05 through 08/09* CITY COUNCIL GOALS 2004-54 Station Rehab Begin demolition and construction
of Fire Station No. 3. Begin design of Fire Stations No. 2 and No. 1 Demolish and rebuild a fire station. Construction of Fire Station #3 (Leucadia) underway with anticipated completion
February 2009. Fire Station #2 (Cardiff) under design and Community Participation Program element completed. Potential construction initiation in July 2009. 2004-23 Hall Property Complete
Environmental Impact Report, secure land use applications and finalize project designs. Recommend a funding plan that will reprogram capital dollars from lower priority projects to make
up the funding gap for the library projects (if possible, do not reprogram funds from the PW facility, street overlay program, or Moonlight Beach.) Council approved Final EIR and project-October
2008. Project has been appealed to the Coastal Commission and a lawsuit challenging the EIR has been filed. Hearing dates are TBD. 2004-43 Moonlight Beach Master Plan Implement changes
to master plan/Renegotiate lease Refine Master Plan based on recommendations from the hydrology and traffic studies. Present to Council Secured a 20-year lease extension with State.
Issued a RFP for design consultant services-December 2008. Anticipate award of contract in February 2009 and beginning design and permitting processing. FIRE PARKS AND RECREATION A-5
Goal # Issue FY2004-05 Goal FY2005/06-2006/07 Goal FY2007-08 Goal Status APPENDIX A Fiscal Years 04/05 through 08/09* CITY COUNCIL GOALS 2004-46 Beacon's Beach Access Implement plan
Complete EIR, acquire discretionary permits, complete construction documents Final EIR before the Planning Commission-Spring 2009. State has issued a "stop notice" for all Prop 12 &
40 Bond projects, which includes Beacon's Beach project. 2004-30 Cardiff Specific Plan Approve specific plan Approve specific plan Subcommittee (CSPARC) completed review of 2nd draft
of the CSP in March 2008. Second draft presented to Planning Commission in July 2008 and Council in September 2008. Informational Open House scheduled for January 29, 2009. Environmental
review being initiated. 2004-32 North Coast Hwy. 101 Streetscape Plan Approve design Approve DR/CDP Three public workshop have been held. Workshop # 3 presented a refined plan and additional
alternative. Consultant currently preparing cost estimates for additional traffic analysis, preparation of additional alternative and additional workshop. 2006-6 Affordable Housing 1.
Proactively address housing issues with State representatives and administration. 2. Develop strategy to preserve the city's mobile home parks for affordable housing 1. Council take
lead with State representatives. 2. Mobile Home Park study completed. Strategies being reviewed & implemented. Review in light of SB 375. Develop strategies for consideration at future
City Council meeting. PLANNING/BUILDING A-6
Goal # Issue FY2004-05 Goal FY2005/06-2006/07 Goal FY2007-08 Goal Status APPENDIX A Fiscal Years 04/05 through 08/09* CITY COUNCIL GOALS *There were no Council Goals initiated in FY08/09,
only work tasks which are listed on separate sheet. SHERIFF PUBLIC WORKS A-7
Year Department Issue Work Task Status FY08/09 City Clerk/City Manager Consider enhancements to local open government practices (Sunshine Ordinance) Evaluate and Report Review of open
government practices to be presented in February or March 2009 for Council review and direction. FY08/09 City Clerk Review Business Registration policies and procedures. Determine any
areas that may require updating Evaluate and Report Program's application process has been revised to allow credit card payment via fax or e-mail. Software for web-based payment evaluated
and cost prohibitive. Complete Review cost of program and cost recovery options. 2007-4 Sheriff's Dept Noise Abatement -Develop an analysis of alternatives for the enforcement of noise
violations along the 101 corridor Evaluate and Report Motor vehicle violations enforcement conducted by Sheriff's. Moved to Work Task list. FY08/09 City Manager (Sheriff's Dept) Present
annual or as needed Law Enforcement Services Overview Report Sheriff Year End Report presented annually. 2007 report presented to Council in April 2008. Complete. Provide periodic updates.
FY08/09 City Manager/City Clerk Consider adopting Responsible Beverage Sales and Service Training Ordinance Evaluate and Report Reviewing cities with similar ordinances. ENGINEERING
APPENDIX A Fiscal Years 07/08 through 08/09 CITY COUNCIL WORK TASKS CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK CITY MANAGER CITY MANAGER (SHERIFF'S DEPT) A-8
Year Department Issue Work Task Status APPENDIX A Fiscal Years 07/08 through 08/09 CITY COUNCIL WORK TASKS FY07/08 Engineering Traffic Calming -Cornish, Devonshire, Sylvia Consider in
conjunction with Traffic Management Plan Cornish traffic calming will be addressed in conjunction with Self-Realization Fellowship plan; Devonshire traffic calming will be addressed
in conjunction with Scripps Hospital development. Update on Sylvia Street traffic calming measures. FY07/08 Engineering (with Finance/City Attorney) Traffic Mitigation Fees -Analyze
Impact on Downtown Evaluate and Report A concept has been developed for modified assessment of traffic fees for businesses in existing structures within the downtown area. The "downtown
area" needs to be defined; report to Council anticipated in spring 2009. FY08/09 Engineering Evaluate unintended consequences of the City's underground utility ordinance; consider any
necessary amendments Evaluate and Report Three workshops have been held, Council sub-committee formed and additional report to City Council anticipated in spring 2009. FY08/09 Engineering
(with Parks & Recreation) Complete the sidewalk between La Quebrada and El Camino Del Norte Provide Status Report Engineering providing support to Parks & Recreation and Public Works
Departments on project. FY08/09 Engineering (with Traffic Commission) Evaluate Neptune Avenue and Leucadia Blvd. west of Hwy 101 public right-of-way encroachments and options for enhanced
pedestrian safety and vehicular striping configuration Evaluate and Report Staff met with residents. Residents are pursuing neighborhood consensus and support. FY08/09 Engineering (with
Parks & Recreation) Review and prioritize minor walkability/pedestrian/trail connections and linking opportunities; consider tie-in priority with Safe Routes to School program Review
options, costs and implementation opportunity Segments to complete continuous sidewalk at Hygeia Ave. south of Leucadia Blvd. and Regal Road/Santa Fe Drive to 600 feet north are under
design. A-9
Year Department Issue Work Task Status APPENDIX A Fiscal Years 07/08 through 08/09 CITY COUNCIL WORK TASKS FY07/08 Parks & Recreation Work with Skateboard Stakeholders to Establish More
Skate Facilities Evaluate Report Ongoing. FY08/09 Parks & Recreation (with City Manager) Evaluate feasibility and options for passenger van shuttle services for the Senior Center and
Coast Highway 101 corridor Review options, costs and feasibility of implementation opportunities Cultural Tourism Committee developing pilot project work plan for presentation in February
or March 2009. PARKS AND RECREATION FINANCE FIRE A-10
Year Department Issue Work Task Status APPENDIX A Fiscal Years 07/08 through 08/09 CITY COUNCIL WORK TASKS FY07/08 Planning & Building Hold a Smart Growth Workshop (housing element,
carrying capacity, etc.) Better define goals and objectives of workshop Combine with "Intelligent Growth" Work Task below. FY08/09 Planning & Building Continue to seek open space and
habitat purchase opportunities and manage and monitor the properties Report as appropriate Ongoing as property becomes available. Currently in discussions with representatives for La
Costa property. FY08/09 Planning & Building Review the North Highway 101 and Downtown Encinitas Specific Plans for possible revisions Evaluate and Report Consider addressing in General
Plan update process. PLANNING AND BUILDING A-11
Year Department Issue Work Task Status APPENDIX A Fiscal Years 07/08 through 08/09 CITY COUNCIL WORK TASKS FY08/09 Public Works (with Parks & Recreation) Develop an Urban Tree Management
and Replacement policy Evaluate and Report A draft policy was presented to the Environmental Commission and approved. The proposed policy will be scheduled for Council review and approval
in early 2009. PUBLIC WORKS A-12
APPENDIX B Project TIER 1 Hall Property Development Phase I Hall Property Off-Site Improvements I-5 Interchange @Encinitas Blvd (Design) Safe Routes to Schools Grade Separated Pedestrian
Rail Crossing Intersection @Leucadia/Vulcan/RR/101 Recreational Trails Development Moonlight Beach Design Multi-Habitat Conservation Plan N. Coast Hwy. 101 Streetscape Comprehensive
General Plan Update TIER 2 El Camino Real Storm Drain Channel Lone Jack (Stratford Knoll Channel) Playground Equipment Replacement La Costa Avenue Widening (Design Only) Manchester Avenue
Realignment Swami's Restroom Replacement Leucadia Long Term Drainage (Design Only) Downtown Parking Lot (Parking Lot B) TIER 3 Habitat/Open Space Acquisition Leucadia Boulevard Improvements
Phase II Traffic Safety and Calming Arroyo Drive Storm Drain El Camino Real Widening and Median Imp. (Design) 4th Street Storm Drain Cottonwood Creek Improvements (2nd/4th Streets) Citizen
Satisfaction Survey Rail Quiet Zone @Chesterfield Priority Tiers for Capital Improvement Projects B-1
This page is intentionally left blank. B-2
Outstanding FY2009-10 Final Original Balance Payment Payment Bond/Lease Name Bond Issue at 6/30/09 P & I FY 1997Certificates of Participation Series A (Civic Center Bonds) $7,550,000
$3,985,000 $605,868 2017 2001 Lease Revenue Bonds Series A (Park Facility) $22,645,000 $19,555,000 $1,507,166 2031 2002 Association of Bay Area Governments Lease Revenue $5,870,000 $3,135,000
$632,535 2018 Bonds includes: 1992 COP $3,325,000 $2,210,000 $296,635 800MHz Communications System $950,000 $390,000 $118,500 HVAC Completed $0 $0 Brush Truck/Pumper Completed $0 $0
Pump Station (ESD) $480,000 $130,000 $68,900 Meter Upgrade (SDWD) $795,000 $355,000 $97,500 Fire Truck $320,000 $50,000 $51,000 2004 Fire Apparatus Lease $361,897 $110,761 $57,759 2011
1999 SDWD Note to Badger Financing Authority Refinanced $0 $0 2025 2007 SDWD Note to Badger Financing Authority $7,705,000 $7,345,000 $632,094 2024 2004 Water Revenue Refunding Bonds
$13,845,000 $11,095,000 $1,029,269 2024 2003 CSD Note to SEJPA $8,735,000 $6,220,000 $747,200 2020 2004 Housing Authority $1,905,338 $1,681,533 $105,296 2034 2006 Fire Apparatus Lease
$350,000 $156,053 $56,607 2012 2006 Lease Revenue Bonds-Library $20,000,000 $19,610,000 $1,195,716 2037 2007 Vac-Con Lease $231,358 $172,680 $39,115 2014 2008 Roof Lease $2,100,000 $1,992,955
$183,557 2023 Totals $91,298,593 $75,058,982 $6,792,182 Totals by Fund General Fund $57,833,255 $48,232,449 $4,111,923 8,735,000 6,220,000 747,200 480,000 130,000 68,900 22,345,000 18,795,000
1,758,863 1,905,338 1,681,533 105,296 $91,298,593 $75,058,982 $6,792,182 Fund General Fund, ESD & SDWD Repayment Source General General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund ESD
SDWD General Fund General Fund SDWD SDWD SDWD CSD EHA General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund San Dieguito Water District Debt Fund Encinitas Housing Authority Cardiff Sanitary
Debt Service Fund Encinitas Sanitary Debt Service Fund Long Term Obligations and Capital Leases Fund General C-1 APPENDIX C
This page is intentionally left blank C-2
D-1 CITY OF ENCINITAS ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL Policy Title: Reserves – General Fund Section: Finance Responsible Department: Finance_____________ Number: F010 Approved By: City Council
Date Approved: 1987 Last Amended: May 2, 2001 Amendment Date: ___August 20, 2008___ SECTION I. Philosophy Sound financial management includes the practice of maintaining an appropriate
reserve for contingencies. The City maintains fund or working capital balances to preserve the City’s credit worthiness and to adequately provide for: • Economic uncertainties, local
disasters or catastrophic events, and other financial hardships or downturns in the local or national economy • Contingencies for unforeseen operating or capital needs • Uninsured losses
• Cash flow requirements This reserve policy shall be periodically reviewed to insure that it is consistent with the current conditions and situations facing the City SECTION II. Definitions
A. General Fund -A single entity that supports all services (e.g., law enforcement, fire) not not assigned to other funds. Each local government has only one general fund. This is the
City of Encinitas’ largest and most discretionary fund. B. Fund Balances – Fund balances represent the net assets of a fund. Net current assets generally represent a fund’s assets (cash,
receivables, etc.) less its liabilities. Portions of a fund’s balance may be reserved, designated or restricted for future expenditures as a result of City policy, terms and conditions
of agreements with outside parties, governmental regulations, laws, or other restricts which the City cannot unilaterally alter. C. Reserves – the non-obligated balance that is available
at the end of each budget year. APPENDIX D
D-2 SECTION III. General Fund Reserves A. A Contingency Reserve will be budgeted each year. The target amount for this reserve shall be reset each year to twenty percent of operating
expenditures (excludes debt service and self-insurance fund payments and capital expenditures). The Contingency reserves will be used to provide for temporary financing of unanticipated
extraordinary needs of an emergency nature and will be drawn down as the funding source of last resort. This reserve is intended to act as a short-term solution to fiscal needs. The
Contingency Reserve is to be used to buy time to find long-term solutions to structural fiscal deficiencies. Examples of events that could trigger the use of reserves include unexpected
liability created by Federal or State legislative action (e.g., takeaways), spikes in utility costs, and catastrophic events such as earthquakes or fires which would delay the payment
of revenues. B. A Budget Stabilization Reserve will be budgeted each year. The target amount for this this reserve shall be reset each year to two percent of operating revenues. The
Budget Stabilization Reserve is intended to guard against recessionary impacts to revenues and protect service levels during difficult fiscal times and should be used to temporarily
restore the budget when revenues come in lower than anticipated. C. Any fund balance that is not allocated to the Contingency Reserve or Budget Stabilization Reserve will be deposited
into the Undesignated Fund Balance or Future Projects Reserves. This reserve is used to fund off-cycle appropriations such as project cost overruns or projects/programs identified outside
of the budget process. This reserve will be maintained at sufficient levels to provide working capital and to accommodate required adjustments to project budgets and off-cycle program/service
needs. SECTION IV: Appropriation/Expenditure of Reserve Funds A. Funds shall be appropriated from the reserves only after the Finance Director and the City Manager have prepared an analysis
and presented it to the City Council. The analysis shall provide sufficient evidence to establish that the remaining reserves are adequate to offset potential downturns in revenue sources
and provide a sufficient cash balance for daily financial needs. The analysis shall address the nature of the proposed expenditure and the revenue requirement in subsequent budget years,
if any. B. A four fifths (4/5) vote of the whole City Council is required for any appropriation and expenditure of funds from the reserves as noted above. SECTION V: Replenishment of
Reserves Any budget surplus at the end of the year should be allocated first to restore reserves to their target level. All budgetary savings will be applied to the reserves until they
are fully replenished. SECTION VI: Other A. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices, all designations of unreserved General Fund fund balance will appear
in the Notes to Financial Statements of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. B. Establishment of the aforementioned policies does not preclude the Council from exceeding the reserve
target amounts or setting aside additional funds for a specific project, program or capital item. APPENDIX D
Appendix E E -1
Appendix E E -2
Appendix E E -3
Appendix E E -4
Appendix E E -5
This page is intentionally left blank. E-6
Glossary Acquisition -The process of gaining assets. ACOE – Army Corps of Engineers who provide quality, responsive engineering services to the nation. ADA -Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990. Allocate -To divide a lump-sum appropriation which is designated for expenditure by specific organization units and/or for specific purposes, activities, or objects. Appropriation
-An authorization made by Council which permits the City to incur obligations and to make expenditures of resources. APWA – American Public Works Association. Assessed Value -A dollar
valuation set upon real estate or other property by the County Assessor as a basis for levying property taxes. Asset -Anything having commercial or exchange value that is owned by a
business, institution or individual. Asset Forfeiture Fund -To account for funds returned from drug enforcement agencies. These funds are the result of enforcement against illegal activities
and must be used in the acquisition of law enforcement supplies or equipment. Audit -Conducted by an independent Certified Public Accounting (CPA) firm, the primary objective of an audit
is to determine if the City’s Financial Statements present the City’s financial position fairly and results of operations are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Badger Filtration Plant -A Water Treatment plant that is jointly owned by San Dieguito Water District and Santa Fe Irrigation District, located in Rancho Santa Fe. The treatment plant
provides the necessary treatment to make the water safe and suitable for drinking. Balanced Budget -A budget in which planned expenditures do not exceed projected funds available. Balance
Sheet -A financial statement reporting the organization’s assets, liabilities and equity activities. Benefit Assessment -Charges levied on parcels to pay for public improvements or services
provided within a pre-determined district or area according to the benefit the parcel receives from the improvement or services. Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 -The 1982 Act lets cities,
counties and special districts finance a variety of improvements. The Act requires majority voter approval if the proposed assessment area has 12 or more registered voters. If less than
12, the owners of at least 60% of the land in the assessment area must give written consent to the assessment. Bond -A written promise to pay a specified sum of money (called the principle)
at a specific date in the future, together with periodic interest at a specific rate. In the Operating Budget, these payments are identified as debt service. Bonds are used to obtain
long-term financing for capital improvements. Budget -A financial plan for a specified period of time that matches planned revenues and expenditures to municipal services. F-1 APPENDIX
F
California State Department Of Transportation (CalTrans) -State Department responsible for the construction and maintenance of the state freeway and highway system. CalTrans is also
involved in state level planning and funding for public transit and bicycle transportation facilities. Capacity -The maximum that can be contained in a system whether it be a tank or
a pipe, etc. Capital Budget -The annual adoption by the Council of project appropriations. Project appropriations are for the amount necessary to carry out a capital project’s expenditure
plan, including multi-year contracts for which a total appropriation covering several years’ planned expenditures may be required. Capital Improvement Program -The annual updated plan
or schedule of project expenditures for public facilities and infrastructure (buildings, roads, etc.) with estimated project costs, sources of funding, and timing of work over a five-year
period. For financial planning and general management, the capital program is a plan of work and expenditures, and is the basis for annual appropriations and bond issues. Capital Outlay
-Expenditures which result in the acquisition of or addition to fixed assets. City policy, fixed asset will normally have a useful life greater than two years and is $1,500. Capital
Project -Project, or phase of a project, that is to be a permanent physical improvement to a city roadway, park or beach facility, building, sewer or water line, or other like physical
facility where the total cost of the project will be greater than $10,000. Equipment, as a rule, will not be considered as a capital project. CEQA – California Environmental Quality
Act informs governmental decision makers
and the public about the potential significant environmental effects of proposed activities; identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced; require
changes in projects through the use of alternatives or mitigation measures when feasible; and disclose to the public the reasons why a project was approved if significant environmental
effects are involved. Circulation Element -The chapter of the General Plan dealing with automobile, bike and alternate transit transportation systems. Consumer Price Index (C.P.I.) -A
statistical description of price levels provided by the U.S. Department of Labor. The change in this index from year to year is used to measure the cost of living and economic inflation.
Contingency -An appropriation of funds to cover unforeseen events that occur during the fiscal year, such as flood emergencies, Federal mandates, shortfalls in revenue, and similar eventualities.
Continuing Appropriation -Funds committed for a previous fiscal year expenditure which were not spent in the year of appropriation but are intended to be used in the current year. Contractual
Services -Services rendered to City activities by private firms, individuals or other governmental agencies. Examples of these services include engineering, law enforcement, and city
attorney services. Debt -All long-term credit obligations of the City and its agencies, whether backed by the City’s full faith and credit or by pledged revenues, and all interest-bearing
short-term credit obligations. F-2 APPENDIX F
Department -A major organizational unit of the City which has been assigned overall management responsibility for an operation or a group of related operations within a functional area.
Designated Fund Balance -A portion of unreserved fund balance designated by City policy for a specific future use. Development Impact Fees -Fees placed on the development of land or
conditions required for the approval of a development project, such as the donation (“dedication” or “exaction”) of certain lands (or money) to specific public uses. The fees are typically
justified as an offset to the future impact that development will have on existing infrastructure. CSD – Cardiff Sanitary Division. Distribution System -The piping system and appurtenances
necessary to deliver adequate quantities of water at sufficient pressures at all times under continually changing conditions while at the same time protecting water quality. Encinitas
Public Financing Joint Powers Authority (E.P.F.J.P.A.) Debt Service -To account for the Civic Center Bond payments and fees for trustee and audit services. ESD – Encinitas Sanitary Division.
Encumbrance -The legal commitment of appropriated funds to purchase an item or service. To encumber funds means to set aside or commit funds for a future expenditure. Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) -An in-depth analysis of potential environmental impacts of a project which includes strategies to mitigate the impacts. Either an Environmental Impact Report or a Negative
Declaration (ND) is required of certain projects by the California Environmental Quality Act. Expenditure -The outflow of funds paid for goods or services obtained. Fees for Services
-Charges paid to the City by users of a service to help support the costs of providing that service. Financial Plan -The document created by the staff and approved by the City Council
which establishes the broad policy guidance on the projection of revenues and the allocation toward various types of expenditures. Financial Report -A comprehensive annual document providing
a snapshot of the City’s financial position on the final day of the fiscal year. A formal audit performed by an independent CPA firm supports the report’s financial information. Fines,
Forfeitures and Penalties -Revenues received and/or bail monies forfeited upon conviction of a misdemeanor or municipal infraction. Fiscal Year (FY) -The beginning and ending period
for recording financial transactions. The City has specified July 1 to June 30 as its fiscal year. Fixed Assets -Assets of long-term nature such as land, buildings, machinery, furniture,
and other equipment. The City has defined such assets as those with an expected life in excess of one year and an acquisition cost in excess of $ 1,500. Franchise Fee -A franchise fee
is charged for the privilege of using public right-of-way and property within the City for public or private purposes. The City currently assesses franchise fees on cable television,
utilities, and trash collection contractors. F-3 APPENDIX F
Fund -An accounting entity that records all financial transactions for specific activities or government functions. The generic fund types used by the City are: General, Special Revenue,
Capital Project, and Insurance Funds. Fund Balance -The excess of current assets over current liabilities, and represents the cumulative effect of revenues and other financing sources
over expenditures and other financing uses. Gann Initiative -See Proposition 4. Gasoline Tax -Also called Highway Users Tax and Motor Vehicle Fuel License Tax. Places a per gallon tax
on fuel used to propel a motor vehicle or aircraft. Use of tax is limited to research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance and operation of public streets and highways or
public mass transit guideways. General Fund -The primary operating fund of the City, all revenues that are not allocated by law or contractual agreement to a specific fund are accounted
for in the General Fund. With the exception of subvention or grant revenues restricted for specific uses, General Fund resources can be utilized for any legitimate governmental purpose.
Goal -A statement of broad direction, purpose, or intent. Grant -Contributions of cash or other assets from another governmental agency to be used or expended for a specified purpose,
activity, or facility. Highway Users Tax -See gasoline tax. Housing Element -The chapter of the General Plan dealing with housing issues and related goals. Impact Fees -Fees required
of a developer/builder for purposes of defraying the actual estimated costs on construction planned facilities such as parks, school, flood, fire, traffic mitigation, etc. Infiltration
-The seepage of rain and/or groundwater into underground pipes and utility holes via cracks in the system. Infrastructure -The City’s basic system of its physical plant, i.e., streets,
water, sewer, public buildings, parks, and beaches. Internal Service Fund – An internal service fund is used to account for the financing of goods and services provided by one department
to another another department on a cost reimbursement basis. Currently the City is using the concept for sewer line maintenance, fleet maintenance and vehicle replacement programs. Investment
Earnings-Earnings received as interest from the investment of funds not immediately required to meet cash disbursement obligations. Joint Powers Authority (J.P.A.) -A joint venture comprised
of two or more governmental entities sharing the cost of providing a public service. Key Objective -A statement of specific direction, purpose, or intent based on the needs of the community
and the goals established for a specific program. LEED – Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. Liability -A claim on the assets of an entity. Line-Item Budget -A budget that
lists detailed expenditure categories (salary, materials, telephone service, travel, etc.) separately, along with the amount budgeted for each specified category. The City uses a program
rather than line-item budget, although detail line-item accounts are maintained and recorded for financial reporting and control purposes. Master Plan -A comprehensive planning document
which encompasses all aspects of current and future needs of the District or area studied. F-4 APPENDIX F
Material and Supplies -A general category used for clarifying expenditures for various materials and supplies which are normally used within a fiscal year. Motor Vehicle Fuel License
Tax -See gasoline tax. Motor Vehicle License Fee (VLF) -VLF is a fee for privilege of operating a vehicle on public streets. VLF is levied annually at 2% of the market value of motor
vehicles and is imposed by the state “in lieu” of local property taxes. VLF is also called Motor Vehicle in-Lieu Tax. Municipal -In its broadest sense, an adjective which denotes the
state and all subordinate units of government. In a more restricted sense, an adjective which denotes a city or village as opposed to other local governments. Municipal Improvement District
-A designated area receiving services for common grounds benefiting property owners, i.e. median landscaping. OPEB – Other Post Employee Benefits is an accounting concept created by
the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) by pronouncements designed to address expenses that entities may or may not be legally bound to pay, but pay as a moral obligation.
Operating Financial Plan -The portion of the budget that pertains to daily operations providing basic governmental services. Personnel Services -Costs associated with providing the staff
necessary to provide the desired levels of service. Included are both salary and benefit costs. Phase -A project carried out in planned incremental stages, usually with the highest priority
items being addressed first in Phase 1. Policy -A direction that must be followed to advance toward a goal. The direction can be a course of action or a guiding principle. Potable Water
-Water that does not contain objectionable pollution, contamination, minerals, or ineffective agents and is considered satisfactory for drinking. Program -A grouping of activities organized
to accomplish basic goals and objectives. Program Budget -A budget that focuses upon the goals and objectives of an agency or jurisdiction rather than upon its organizational budget
units or object classes of expenditure. Property Tax -An ad valorem tax imposed on real property (land and permanently attached improvements) and tangible personal property (movable
property). Proposition 4 -Also called the Gann Initiative, this initiative, now Article XIIIB of the state constitution, was drafted to be a companion measure to Proposition 13, Article
XIIIA of the constitution. Article XIIIB limits growth in government spending to changes in population and inflation. Proposition 13 -Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, commonly
known as Proposition 13, which limits the maximum annual increase of any ad valorem tax on real property to 1% of the full cash value of such property. Real Property Transfer Tax -Also
called Documentary Transfer Tax, this tax is imposed on the transfer of ownership in real estate at a rate of $0.55 per $500.00 of property value. Reclaimed Water -Non-potable water
used primarily for landscaping and floriculture irrigation. Reclamation -The process of recovering usable, but non-potable water from the tertiary treatment of wastewater. F-5 APPENDIX
F
Regional Water Quality Control Board -A State agency which among other responsibilities regulates the discharge of water into streams, groundwater, and bodies of water. Reimbursement
for State Mandated Costs -Article XIIIB, Section 6 of the California Constitution which requires the state to reimburse local agencies for the cost of state-imposed programs. Process
is commonly called “SB 90” after its original 1972 legislation. Rents -Revenues received through the rental of public properties to private parties such as convention space and library
facilities. Reserve -An Account used to indicate that a portion of a fund’s balance is legally restricted for a specific purpose and is, therefore, not available for general appropriation.
Revenue -Funds that the government receives as income. It includes such items as tax payments, fees from specific services, receipts from other governments, fines, forfeitures, grants,
shared revenues, and interest income. Revenue Bonds -Bonds issued to acquire, construct or expand expand public projects for which fees or admissions are charged. Bonds are repaid solely
from the income generated by use of that project. Risk Management -An organized attempt to protect an organization’s assets against accidental loss in the most costeffective manner.
RTCIP – Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program is intended to ensure that future development will contribute its share toward funding and mitigating new traffic impacts
on the Regional Arterial System. Sales Tax -The sales tax is imposed on retailers for the privilege of selling tangible personal property in California. Tax base is the total retail
price. San Diego Association Of Governments (SANDAG) -A public agency formed by local governments to assure overall area-wide planning and coordination for the San Diego region. SCADA
-Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition. A computer system to monitor and control the water valves. SDR Pump Station – San Dieguito Reservoir Pump Station. SDWD – San Dieguito Water
District. SEJPA – San Elijo Joint Powers Authority. SEWRF – San Elijo Water Reclamation Facility. Service Charges -Charges imposed to support services to individuals or to cover the
cost of providing such services. The fees charged are limited to the cost of providing the service or regulation required (plus overhead). SFID – Santa Fe Irrigation District. Special
Assessment -A compulsory levy made against certain properties to defray part or all of the cost of a specific improvement or service deemed to primarily benefit those parties. (Also
known as benefit fees.) Special Revenue Funds -Funds used to account for the proceeds from specific revenue sources (other than trusts or major capital projects) that are legally restricted
to expenditures for specific purposes. F-6 APPENDIX F
F-7 Subventions -Subsidy or financial support received from county, state or federal government. The state and county currently levy certain taxes that are “subvened” to cities, including
motor vehicle license fees, state mandated costs and motor vehicle fuel tax. TDA – Transportation Development Act funds are discretionary TransNet monies that are distributed on a competitive
grant basis. TMDLs -Total Maximum Daily Loads is a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a water body can receive and still meet water quality standards, and an allocation
of that amount to the pollutant's sources. Transient Occupancy Tax -Tax levied by cities on persona staying 30 days or less in a room(s) in a hotel, inn, motel, tourist home, non-membership
campground or other lodging facility. Also called Transient Lodging Tax. TransNet – TransNet funds are derived from the San Diego County voter approved 20-year one-half cent transportation
sales tax which expires in 2009, but extended by voters in 2004 for an additional 20 years. Funds are limited to constructing, operating, and maintaining transportation facilities. Trust
and Agency Funds -Also known as Fiduciary Fund Types, these funds are used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity or as an agent for private individuals, organizations,
or other governmental agencies. Unsecured Property -As the property tax is guaranteed by placing a lien on the real property, unsecured property is that real property in which the value
of the lien is not sufficient to assure payment of the property tax. Use Tax -The use tax is imposed on the user of a product whenever the sale tax does not apply, such as on goods purchased
out-of-state and delivered for use in California and on long-term leases. Tax base is the total retail price. User Fees -The payment of a fee for direct receipt of a service by the party
benefiting from the service. Work Projects Program -A program to provide for the maintenance or replacement of existing public facilities and assets and for for the construction or acquisition
of new ones. Working Capital -Difference between current assets and current liabilities. Zero Based Budgeting -A method of budgeting in which all expenditures must be justified each
new period, as opposed to only explaining the amounts requested in excess of the previous period's funding. The method utilized to develop the FY2007-08 and FY2008-09 operating budgets.
APPENDIX F
This page is intentionally left blank. F-8
A About the City of Encinitas, 1-1 Adoption Schedule, FYs 2009-10 & FY2010-11, 1-7 Affordable Housing Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-21 Annual Street Overlay Program, 8-2, photo,
1-5 Anode Bed Replacement (Water), 9-10 Asset Forfeiture Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-36 Assumptions for Financing the Six-Year Financial Plan, 1-l1, economic impacts, 1-11,
revenue 1-12, expenditures 1-16, salaries & benefits 1-17, Water District 1-18, Cardiff and Encinitas sanitary divisions 1-18 B Badger (R. E.) Master Plan Projects, 9-9 Badger (R. E.)
Miscellaneous. Plant Improvements, 9-5 Badger (R. E.) Plan Capital Acquisitions, 9-3 Basis of Accounting, 1-26 Basis of Budgeting, 1-26 Budget Awards/Recognitions, 1-22, copies of certificates
1-23, 1-24 Budget Format, 1-19 Budget Philosophy, 1-2 C C.D.B. Grant Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6; cashflow 2-20; as a funding source, 1-9 Cardiff Sanitary Division Funds (CSD) (501,
502, 503, 504, 506), summary 2-3, 2-5, cashflow 2-48, capital projects summarized 5-1, project sheets 5-2, 5-5 Cerro Street MID Fund, 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-40 City and Water District
Funds, narrative 1-8 City Commissions, 1-1 City Council Goals and Work Tasks, Appendix A City Council Reserve Policy – General Fund, Appendix D City Manager’s Transmittal letter, behind
Table of Contents Citywide Flood & Channel Maintenance Permitting Program, 3-9 Citywide Landscape and Lighting District Proposition 218 Ballot, 3-10 Civic Center Improvements Fund, summary
2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-12 Civic Center Improvements, 6-2 Coastal Zone Management Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-19 Community Facilities Fund, 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-32
Comprehensive List of All Active Capital Improvement Projects, 11-1 Consultant Studies, project description 1-8 CSD Master Plan Implementation, 5-1, 5-5 CSD Share of CIPs at San Elijo,
5-1, 5-2 Appendix G
D Debt Service Fund (Encinitas Public Financing Authority) (321), 2-3, 2-5,2-7, cashflow 2-44 Department Organizational Analysis, 1-4 Description of City and District Funds, 1-8 Digital
Topography/GIS Basemap Updates and Enhancements, 3-15 District Services Fund, summary 2-3, 2-5,2-7, cashflow 2-49 Document Format, 1-17 Drainage Projects, project description 1-8 E Encinitas/NCTD
Transit Parking Lot, 8-11 Economic Impacts for developing six-year plan 1-11 Encinitas Housing Authority Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-24 Encinitas Citywide Landscape and Lighting
Fund, 2-2, 2-4, 26-, cashflow 2-41 Encinitas Public Financing Authority Fund – Debt Service (321), 2-3, 2-5, 2-7, cashflow 2-44 Encinitas Ranch Landscape and Lighting District Fund,
2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-43 Encinitas Sanitary Division (ESD) Funds (521, 522, 523 and 524), summary 2-3, 2-5, 2-7, cashflow 2-46, capital projects summarized 5-1, project sheets 5-3,
5-4 and 5-6 ESD Master Plan Implementation, 5-1, 5-6 ESD Share of CIPs at Batiquitos Pump Station, 5-1, 5-3 ESD Share of CIPs at Encina, 5-4 F Façade Improvement Incentive Program, 3-2
Facilities Projects, project descriptions, 1-8 Federal Special Law Enforcement Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-36 Federal Capital/Transportation Grants Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4,
2-6, cashflow 2-15 Finance Studies, (Fees and Liabilities), 3-6 Financial Plan Assumptions, 1-8, Revenue All Funds, 1-9, Personnel, 1-14, Non-Personnel, 1-16 Financial Planning Process,
Process and timeline, 1-4 Fire Hydrants Installation Projects, 9-7 Fire Mitigation Fees Fund, 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-37 Fleet Maintenance, summary 2-3, 2-5, 2-7, cashflow 2-50 Flood
Control Fees, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-27 G Gas Tax Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4; 2-6, expenditures by department/division, 1-8; cashflow 2-14; General Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4; 2-6,
l cashflow 2-8; as a funding source 1-13, General Fund by Department and Division, 2-8 General Plan Update, Comprehensive, 3-5 Glossary of Terms, Appendix F Governmental Educational
Access Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6. cashflow 2-24 Glossary of Terms, Appendix F Grade Separation Pedestrian Crossings, 11-3 Appendix G
Green Building Incentives Program, 3-3 H H. T. E. Replacement, City’s Financial Software, 3-16 Habitat/Watershed/Open Space Acquisition, 7-3 Hall Property Environmental Review, Design
and Development, Phase I; 7-2; photo 1-25 HOME Entitlement Fund, summary 2-2-2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-23 I In-Lieu Underground Public Improvements Fund (239), 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-34
In Lieu Public Improvement Fees Fund (238), 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-33 L La Costa Avenue Widening, 8-10 Lagoon Monitoring, 3-4 Leucadia Blvd. Improvements (I-5 to Vulcan), Phase II,
8-4 Leucadia Blvd./Vulcan Ave./Coast Hwy. 101 Intersection Improvements, 11-3 Library A/V Room Equipment, 6-3 Long Term Obligations and Capital Leases, Appendix C M Meter Replacement
and Automation Program, 9-6 Motorized Actuators for Transmission Lines, 9-8 N North Coast Highway 101 Streetscape, 8-3, photos 1-2 O Open Space Fund, 2-2, 2-4, cashflow 2-32, photo 1-10
P Pacific Pines Condominiums Fund, 2-3, 2-5, 2-7, cashflow 2-48 Park Development Fees Fund, summary 2-2-2, ,2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-28 Parks and Beaches Projects, project description 1-8
Parkland Acquisition Fees Fund, 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-29 Priority Tiers for Capital Improvement Projects, Appendix B Public Safety Grants Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-36
Purpose of the Six-Year Financial Plan and Capital Improvement Program, 1-3 Q Quarterly Spending Plans, 1-4 R Recognition/Awards, 1-26, 1-27. 1-28 Recreation Programs, summary 2-2, 2-4,
2-6, cashflow 2-13 Recreation Trail Fees Fund, 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-31 Recreational Trails Fund Development Fund project, 7-4 Appendix G
Index G-4 Recycling/Solid Waste/HHW Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-25 Resolutions of Adoption, City and San Dieguito Water District, Appendix E RTCIP Regional Arterial System
Fee, 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow, 2-35, fund description 1-9 S Safe Routes to Schools/Pathways Program, 8-5 San Dieguito Water District Funds (531, 534, 536, 537, 538), summary 2-3, 2-5,
2-7, cashflow 2-47, capital projects summarized 9-1, project sheets 9-1 to 9-10, and 3-12, 3-13, 3-14 Sand Compatibility Opportunistic Use Program (S.C.O.U.P.), 3-8 SANDAG-Regional Beach
Sand Project II, 3-7 Santa Fe Dr. (I-5 to MacKinnon Avenue), 8-8 Self-Insurance Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-10 Significant Economic Impacts, Planning Assumptions, 1-8 Special
Law Enforcement Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-36 Standard Pacific Park Site Development, 7-5 State Capital Grants, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-16 Storm Drain Repair Fund,
4-2 Streets and Rail Corridor Projects, project description, 1-8 Summary of the Financial Plan, Chapter 2, narrative 1-20 Summary of the Capital Improvement Program (Chapters 3-through
9), 1-25 Summary of Unfunded/Underfunded City/District Capital and Work Projects, narrative 10-2 T Technology Replacement Project, 3-17 Timeline for Developing and Adopting Budget, table
1-7 Traffic Mitigation Fees Fund, 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-28 Traffic Safety Calming Improvements, 8-6 Traffic Signal Modification, 8-7 Traffic Signals Red and Green LED Light Replacement
Program, 3-11 Transportation Development Act Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-18 Transnet Fund, summary 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-17 V Vehicle Replacement Fund, summary 2-3, 2-5,
2-7, cashflow 2-51 Village Park Municipal Improvement District (MID) Fund, 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-38 Villanitas Road MID Fund, 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-39 W Water Distribution Line
Upgrades, 9-2 Water Projects, project description 1-8 Water Valve Replacement Project, 9-4 Wiro Park Fund, 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, cashflow 2-42 Z Zero-Based Budgeting, 1-4 Appendix G
Civic Center Improvements; Public Facilities Capital Improvement Project; Page 6-2 City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue, Encinitas, CA 92024 Tel: 760.633.2600 Fax: 760.633.2879
www.cityofencinitas.org San Dieguito Water District 160 Calle Magdalena, Encinitas, CA 92024 Tel: 760.633.2650 Fax: 760.436.3592 e-mail: water@cityofencinitas.org City of Encinitas San
Dieguito Water District