2000-09-27 (Report)
- ~CI'i'Y OF ENCINITAS
HOUSING AUTHORITY
AGENDA REPORT
Mccting Uatc: Scptembrr 27, 2000
TO: I lonorabic Mayor and City Council
~c
VI:~: Kcrry L. Mifler, City Manager~
FROM: Sandra }{older, Community Dcvelopment Director,
,
Ciary T. [3ancerio, Senior Planncr L,
nmanda Mills. F[ousing & Grants Analyst
SU!3.IF.CT: Consider approval of the 1999/2000 Section 8 Management Assessment Progran
(SEMAI') Certification, and adoption of Resolution 2000-01 authorizing submission to the U.S.
Department of f-lousing and Urban Development.
BACKCROUND: "I'hc U.S. dept. of Flousing and Urban Development (HUD) requires an
objectivc measure of housing agency performance in key Section 8 program areas. The Sectiun 8
~ Nianagement Assessment Program (SGMAP) includes 15 performance indicators that H?JD will use
lU BStit'SS II1C housing agcncy perf'onnance. Housing agencies (HA) must annually submit a SEMAP
certitication form after the end of its fiscal year. The FIA board must approve the certification.
ANALYSIS: Staff has performed the revicws and tests to dete:mine the HA's response in the 15
pmgram areas. Some of the program areas are also analyzed annually by independent auditors,
which review the City's integrity and accountability when using Federal funds.
Puture SEMAi' certifications will use a rating system. HUD has deferred the rating system and audit
requiremcnts until next year. The current revicw was offered as the second trial pe;ioci to give HA's
an opportunity to examine thcir program operations in the key areas measured by SEMAP and [c
improve pertixmance if necessary. After review, staf'f has determined that the Encinitas HA will
reccivr a standard performance rating.
RECOMMENDATInN: Approvc thc 1999/2000 Scction 8 Management Assessment Program
Ccrtifiauion, and adoption of Resolution 2000-01 authorizing submission to the U.S. Department of
I Iousing and l(rban llevclopment.
Attachmcnts:
A-Itesolution 2000-01
R- Sf:MAI' C'ertificatiun
~
~
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION 2000-01
~
~
~ta-.z
ItH:sOLul•IoN yo.:uou-o1
~ RIi.SOLU'I'li)N OF'CF11? IIOl1tiINC All'I'IIORI'I'Y OF 1'IIF. C17'Y OF ENCINI7'Ati
AU'1'!1ORI'LING FLtiCAL t'I:AR 1999/2000 tiEMAP C1:12TIFICATION
"CO'fHE U.S. UE,P:U27'hiF:NT OH IIOUti1Ni: AND 1IR13AN DF.VF:LOI'MENT.
N1'i1k:Ra:AS, it is the I lousing Authorit}I'tidcsirc lo opcratc an etTectivc and cfticicnt housing
prograun; iuld
WfIERH:Ati, thc Lhp.irtment oC l tousing and Urban f)cvelopment hus required the Section 8
Managemcnt Assessmenl Prugram (SLMAk') Ceriification; and
WHERF,AS, thc City has pertomud the necessary program perfornianccreviews; and
WHEREAS, the SEMAP Certification has been received and approved by the Housing
Authority at u public mccting; and
NOW, THEl2F.FORE, 13F. IT RESOLVF.D, by the Flousing Authority of the City of
Encinitas as follows:
1. The 1999/2000 SEMAPCertiticationisherebyapproved;and
2. Thzit thc City Nlanager is hcreby identifiedand authorized to be the official representativeof
the t iousing Authority for all program submission requirements.
~ PASSED rWD ADOP"1'GD hy thc Housing AuUiority of the City of ~~ncinitas at a regular mecting
thereot', held on the 27th day of September, 2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABS'1'AIN:
ARSE~.NI':
SHEILA CAMERON, Chair
City of Encinitas Housing Authority
A"f"f13S"I':
DEi3ORt11 i CI:RVONFi , City Clcrk
~
~~r~
~
AT'I'ACHMENT B
tiECTION 8 MANAGEMF.NT ASSESSMGNT
~ PKOGItAM CER7'IFICATION
~I
~
~
~ H;-4
!
Section 8 Management Assessment u.S. Departmem ot Housing ua+B n,,c1i rvo ,o.u n sl
and l~rban Development
Program (SEMAP) Oflice of Pubhc ,ind Indian Huusinq
•Certification
Pubhc rppohmg burtlen tor th,s coilecbon ot inlormalion is esUm,VCU W avrr,ige 12 hours, per reseunse. inciudm9 the time lur reviewmg instruclwns,
searcning eaisUng tlatn sources, 9nihenng intl mainiammg the data neeaetl, and completin9 ann reviewmg ihe coller.lion ol inlmmatwn. 1 his ;iqency may
nM conducl or sponsur. and yuu am nut reqwreU to respontl to, a colleclion ol inbrmanon unless d displays a currently vahtl UMB control number,
Tlus callecUOn of inlormi1ion is requveA by 24 CFR sec 985.101 wnich requues a Pubhc Housing Agency (PHA) atlmimstenny a Sochon d tenant•based
assislance program to submrt an annual SEMAP Certdiwtron within 60 tlays ahar the end M rts hscal year. ihe inturmation Irom the PMA concems the
pedormance ol Ihe PHA antl provitles asswance Ihat Ihere is no evidence of serwusly dehcient perormanca HUD uses the mbrmaUOn ana other tlala
lu assess PHA rnanogement capabilities and delicienaes, and lu assign an ovemll pedormance raling to the PHA. Rosponses are mantlatory antl the
inlormauon colleciecl does not lend dsell to contidenhality.
InsfrucUons Respond to this cenihcaUon lorm using the PHA's actual data lor the hscal year just ended.
PHA Namc For PHA FY Endmg (mrnidd:yyyy) Submission Date (mrtVtltl/yyyy)
CITY OF ENCINIiAS 06/30/2000 09I29I2000
Check here If the PHA expends less than $300,000 a year In Federal awards
Indicalors 1- 7 wdl not be rated d the PHA expends less Ihan S300.000 a year In Federal awards and its Section 8 programs are not audiled
lor comphince wdh regulaUOns by an mdependent auddor. A PHA that expends less than 5300,000 in Federal awards m a year must slill
complete the cerhticaUon lor these indicators.
PeAormance Indlcators
i Scleciiun Irom thc W;uhnq l.isi 124 CFR 98254(U)(1) and 982.204(a))
fal The PHA hns wrilten poliaes in its anministrauve pWn lor seiecUng apphcanls from the waNng tist.
PHA Response Ves x No
lol rn, Pr+nti qu,dity r.unuoi s;imulos ol apphcants reachmg the top ol the wanmg 6s1 antl of atlmissions show Ihat at least 98%'= ot the famities in the
snnlples we, seleciod hom trio w;ininq hst for aomission m accortlance wilh the PHA's pohaes antl met the sele[uon cnteria ihat determmed thev placea
,rn tlir, w:lilin<j litil ani: Ih,rir ixtler of sMection.
PHA Responso Ves % No
02 Nnasun;mle Nenl 124 CFH 9974 9112.54(G)(15). 982.15810(7) and 982.507) .
ja1 ihn PnA nas ;in(7 imnlemems a reasonable wnuen methotl m tlelermme antldocument for each und leasetl Ihat the rent to owner is roasonable based
nn r,i,rreni ~onts for compar:inlu un:issistetl umts (i) at the lime ol inNal leasing, (nl belore any increase m Ihe rent lo owner, antl (in) al the HAP contracl
anmvers.uy d Uhern is n 5 ur,rceni tler.rease in Ihe DubGshed FMR in elfect 60 tlays betore the HAP eontract annrversary. Th PHA's methotl takes inlo
r.nncidor,wun the loc.auon, sice, typr.. qualay, anA aye of tlie program unit antl of vmtlar unassisted imiis, antl any amenitios, housing services,
m,iintr.nance or ulilities t>rovitletl by the owners.
PHA Rosponse Yes x No
(U) The PNA's qu.dny cumrol sample ol Icnam hlr.s lor which a determination ot reasonaole rrnt was reqwred shows Ihat tho PHA tollowed its wnllon
incthoct to delemune reasnnnble rent and CocumeNetl its tlelerminatwn Ihat the rent to owner is reasonable as r8qwred for (theck one):
PMA Response x At least 98°'0 of unlls sampled 80 to 97% ot uNts sampled Less than 80°6 of unlts eampled
:1 Oeerrnin;qion ot ncpusteU Incoma (24 CF-H part 5, subpart F anC 24 CFR 982.516)
I hn PHA'S qu%ihty r.oNrnl slmple of Ir.nlvit r.i,s shows thai at the hme of admission antl reexammatwn, the PHA properly oblainad Ihird party verificalion
ol ritliusled income or Uor.umeNed why Ihrtl p;iny verdication was nol avadable; used Ihe verAied iNormallon m tletermining adjusled income; propedy
ann[iuteA allowtinr.es Inr expenses, and, whcrc fhp t:imily is re5pon5ible lor ulilitiCS dntler the IeaSC. the PHA uSCd the .7ppropriOtC utility BIIOw0nCB510r
the unit Icased m detcrmining Ric ywss renl lor (r.hock one)
PHA Response x AI least 90 0 of flles sampled BO to B9%6 of files sampled Less than BOq ol flles sampled .1 Urlity Albwancc Scheclulc 124 CFR 3825! 71
1 h,o Ph1A rnaintauns an uplo -datn uli6ty allowance schedWe. ihe PHA revmwr.J utdtly rile data that it oblametl wlthln the lasl 12 monihs, antl adjusletl
ns uuhty rdlow.inr.o schedulr. J Iherr, has boien a change of 10°a or more in a uulny rete since the last ume the ulAity allowance schedule was revised.
PHA Response Ves X No
~ HOS Ou;tlAy Control Insprctipns (24 CFH 9N2 405(b1)
a PHA supern,or lor olher qualiheA person) ranspected a sample ot units Uunng the PHA hscal year, which met the miNmum sample srze requimd by
HUD (sen 7n CFR 985 br quality control ol HOS inspechons. Tho PHA supervisor's reinspected sample was drewn Irom recently compleled HOS
~nspechuns an(J rep,nsents a tro55 seclion ol nei9hborhooCS and the work ot a cros5 seehon ot inspedors.
PHA Respanse Yes x No
fi HUS F ntnrr,rment (:'a (;FH 992 dp.f ) .
ih,, PF+aa qunlity r.ontroi sample ot r,ase hles wnh Imled HOS insper,trons shows that, for all cases sampletl, any citetl Ide4hrealening HOS doliciencles
w,•r~..„r-,~irff wnhin 24 hnurs Irom Ihe tnSUCChon ind, all olher citod HOS delinr.ncies were correctetl wilhin no more than 30 calendar tlays Irom the
~ ~nsu,,u,,n -r,wy PHA approved r.■tension. or, d HOS hehar.ncir.s were not correclnd within the reqwretl time Irame, the PHA sloppetl housing assistance
p;iymr•niti uilyinninq nn 47trr Ihan Ihn hr5t nt Ihe moNh followinq Ihr, corrr.cUOn penod, or took prompt and wgorous action to enforce the lamdy obligaUOns
I"r ii:l,c:k -"l
PHA Response x At least 98"e of wses sampled Less thon 98% of cases sampled
fom HUD•52648 (8N2000)
r.,.unis n,:n~,~~ nu;ntr.d• I'aqe 1 0l q
rcl. 24 CFH Part`8~
R2
• . ~I
7. Expanding HouSmg Opporlunilies. (24 CFR 982.54(tl)(5). 982.153(b)(9) ana (b)(4), 9P:3Utl:i) ana 983301(b)(4) antl (b)(12)1. I
Applles onfy to PHAa wllh jurladlctlon In metropolltan FMR areos.
~ Chock haro II nat opplicabla ~
(a) Tho PHA has a writton poficy to encutuago paNapation by owners of units oulsltle aroas of poverty of mmority conconlration which claarly tlolineates
aroax in its jun,tliction Ihat Ihe PHA consitlers areas nt povorty or minonly concemratwn, antl which inclutles acuons Iho PHA will Iake to encourage
ownar panicipauon.
PHA Reeponse Yee ~ . No
(b) The PNA has documonlation Ihat shows that it took acUOns mdicated in its w,iuen polity to encourogo panicipafion by owners outsido arpas of poveny I
and minairy concontratlon.
PMA Rasponse Yes I ,_X No
(e) Tho PHA has praparad maps Ihat show various aroas, both wilhin and neiyhboring its junsdiclion, wilh housmg opportunitias outsitlo areas of poverty I
antl minonly concenhaUOn: tha PHA has assembled mformation about job opponunitles, schools and servlces in these areas; antl Ihe PHA uses the maps
end rolale0 iniormalion when hriefing voucher holtlora ,
PMA Respanse Vae F X I No , I
(U) The PHA's information packet lor voucher holdors contains eithor a list of awners who are wilhng to lease, or properties availabte lor teaso, under
tho vuuchar program, or a hst of other oryanizalions Ihal wdl help lamllies fmtl unlls and Ihe list includes propeAies or organizations that operata outside
aroas of poverty or muwnly concentraUOn. I
PHA Raeponse Yee 1, X;~ No
(e) Tho PHA's Inlorm;rtion packet mcludes an explanation of how portability works antl includes a list of neighboring PHAS wilh the name, address antl
IoleVhono number of a portaDilily conlact person at oach. ,
FHA Flesponse Yee I X No (f) Ihe PHA has analy=otl whelher voucher holdcrs have experienced tlitticullies in lintling housing oulside areas of poverty or minOnty concentraGOn .
and, where such Adficultws worc lound, the PHA has considered whether it is appropnate to seek approval of exceplion payment standard emounts in
any pan of ns IunsdicUOn and has soughl HUD approval when necessary.
PHA Responae Yea ~ X No
8 Payment Slantlards The PHA has adopteh curront payment stantlards for Ihe voucher program Oy unit size for each FMR area in Ihe PHA jurisdictlon
and, if apphwble, for ear,h PHAdesignamd part of an FMR area, which tlo nol exceed 110 percent of the currenl applicable FMR and which are not
ioss ihan 90 perc:ent of iho current FMF (uMess a lower percent is approved by HUD). (24 CFR 982.503)
PHA Responae Yas I X No 'Fnter cwrant FMRS and paymenl slandartls (PS)
~
0-PN FMH . 563 1-9R FMR 543 2-BR FMR. _ BOS 3•BH FMR 1719 4-BR FMR 1320
_
PS 110 0_ PS --110-0--. PS 170% PS 110°'0 P$ 110% -
II the PHA has jurlsdiction In more than ane FMR area, andlor If the PHA has establlshed separate peymant etandards lor e PHA-designated
paA of an FMR area, attach simllar FMR and payment s!andard comparlsons for each FMR area and dealgnated area.
g. Annuai Heoxammahons. Thn PHA compleles a reexamination lor each paAicipating family at least every 72 months. (24 CFR 982.576)
PHA Roaponse Ves No ~ X,
10. CorrCof Tenanl fient CaItulalions. ThC PHA rorrecUy CalCUlateS IOnBnt rE+nf in IhC r9M81 Cehificate progr2m ar1tl thB fertlily re(1t IO OwnOr 10 IhB r@Otal
vuuchor proqram. (24 CFR 982, Subparl K)
PHA Respanse Vas ixNo '
t t. PrecoNr:ir.l MOS Inspechons. Each newly leasetl unit passetl HOS inspection beloro ihe beginning dalo al iha assistetl lease and HAP contract. (24 CFF
982305)
PHA Response Yea 'XNo i
12. Annual hIUS Inspeclions. The PHA inspecls each unit under coniract at least annually. (24 CFR 902.405(a))
PHA Rosponae Yes : No X i
19 Lr,asnUV Thu PHA rxecums assislance conlrar.ls on behall of eGgible famllies lor Ihe numbe of unils thal has been untlm budgel lor at teast ene year.
PHA ResPonee Vas ; X . No 1
1 aa FamiN Sr,'.-Sutturrwy EnrdlmenL The PHA has enrcAletl famAies m FSS as requhcd. (24 CFR 984.105)
Appllee onty to PHAS requlred to atlminister an FSS program.
Check hero If not appllceble ! x
PHA Reeponee
a Mumbr.r of mannalory fS5 slots (Counl units funtled uncler tho FY 1992 FSS mcenlive awards and m FY 1993 and lator
Inruugh 1012011999. Eaciude unns luntled in connncuon wilh Soction 8 and Seclion 23 prolecl-basetl coNraCl
S Iemm~atwns, Vt+blic housiny demoliliun, disUosilion anq ieplacemr.nP, HUD multdamtly proporty salo5: propaitl or
termmair.d mortyayos untler sechun 236 or soclion 221(d)(3): and Soction H mnr.wat lundmg. Subtract Iho numbor of I:in+ilics Ih(11 SIICCf!SSllllly (;nmVlv.led Ihmr cnntracl5 on ur illor 10121/1990.)
I I
or. Numpnr of manAatoN FSS slols untlcr HUDnpprrivr.d eMn!PUon '
lorm MUD-52648 (8i12000)
85
I1'..vious odiUnn in ohsolrtte pnr : M 4 rol. 24 C~Por1a4
b. Number of FSS lamilies curronlly enrolletl
~ c. Porlabilily: If you are the INqal PHA, enler the number ol lamihes currently enrolietl in your FSS program, bul whu .
have movetl under portabiGty and whoso Sectwn B assistance is atlminislered oy anoiher PHA
Partonl of FSS stots lilletl (b + c tlividod by a)
14b. Percont of FSS Panicipants wnh Escrow Accoum Balancos. Tne PHA has matle progress in suppuning larmly sell•sulficmncy ns me.isurotl by Iho
percaN of currorliy enrolled FSS lamilios with escrow accoum balances. (24 CFq 984.305)
Appllas only to PHAs raquired to adminlster an FSS program.
Check here II not appllcable L%
PHA Responso Yes Nc
Portability: II you are the Inltlal PHA, enler the number ol families wilh FSS escrow accounts currunlly enroltad in your
FSS Program, but who have moved under portability antl whose Seclion 8 assistance is admims!ored by anothnr PHA
Deconcentration Bonus Indleator (Optional antl only for PHAS with jurisdiction in melropolilan FMF aroas).
The PHA rs submdhng wnh this certilication tlala which show that:
(t) Half or moro ol all Sodion 8 famiiies wilh chiltlren assisted by the PHA m its principal ooerating area resiCed in Iow povorty census tracts at the end ol the lasl
PHA FV.
(2) The Vercent of Section 8 mover families with children who movetl to low poverty census tracts in the PHA's principal operatiry area during the last PHA FY
is at Ieast Iwo porcenlage poims higher Ihan the percent of all Secuon B famllies with chiltlren who residetl in low povetly cen5us iracls aI ihe ond of tho last
PHA FV:
Of
(3) Tlia percent of SocUOn 8 movor families wnh chlltlren who moved to low poverty census Iracts in the PHA's principal operating area over the last Iwo
PHA FYs is a1 loasl two percentago polNS higher than the percenl ol all Section 8 famlties with childron whu residod in low poverty census trads et the
and ol Iho secontl lo last PHA FY.
PHA Hasponse Yes j x' No If yes, nttaeh completed deconeentratlon bonus Indicetor addendum.
I horeby cortdy Ihat, to the bast of my knowletlge. the above responses untler the Section 8 Managemenl Assessment Program (SEMAP) are lrue and accurate
lor the PHA hscal yaar mtlicalad above. t also certlty that, to my present knowletlge, there is not evidence to indicate seriously deficient pedoimance that casts
doubt on the PHA's capacity to admiNSler Sectiun 8 rental assistance in accordance vnih foderal iaw antl regulalions.
~ Waming: HUD Mnll proseciAe lalse Gauns antl statemenls. Conviction may result m cnmmat arxYa dvil penalties. (18 U.S.C. 1001. 1010, 1012; 31 U.S.C. 3729, 3802)
ExecuUvo Duecior. signaturo Chairperson. Board of Commissioners, signature
_ . _ . . '
Datc (mnvaa/YYYY) 09128/ 2000-------- Da1e (mMddlyyyy) _ 09I28/2000
The PHA may mUutle with ds SEMAP certificalion any mformatwn beanng on the accuracy or compleleness of the information used by the PHA in proviping its
cendicatron.
s
form HUD•52648 (8//2000)
Prrvwas ndihro~ is nhsolrte paQr, 3 0l 4 rel. 24 CFR PBA 98
ffd-7
SEMAP Certification - Addendum for Reporting Data for Deconcentration Bonus Indicator
s Dalo (mrtvtl(/YYri) 092812000
PHA Namo _ CITY OF ENCINITAS HOUSING AUTHORItt
Pnnclpal Operating Aren of PHA _ CITY OF ENCINITAS _
(The geographic onUty foi which the Census labulates tlala)
Spaclal Instructlona for State or reglonal PHAS. Complate a copy ol this atldanGum lor each metropolitan area or portion ol a malropolilan orea (i.e„ principal
oparating areas) whera the PHA has assislod 20 or more Section 8 families with childran in the lasl completed PHA FY. HUD will rate the areas seperately
and Ihe separato raUngs will then be weightod by Ihe number of assisted Iamilies wllh chlltlren in each area antl avuregetl lo determine banus points.
_
1990 Cansus Povorty Rate ol Principol Opcrating Area 12,674(4)
Criterla to Obtain Deconcentratlon Indicator Bonus Points
Tc quality for bonus points, a PHA must compiete the requested information and answer yes ior only one of the 3 criteria below. However,
State and ragional PHAs must always complete line 1) b for each metropolitan principal opereting area.
1) _13 a. Number ol Section 8 families with children assisted by the PHA in its principal opera!ing area at the end of ihe last PHA
FY who live in low poverty census lracts. A low poveAy census tract is a trect with a poverty rate at or below the overall
poverty rate for the principat operating area ol the PHA, or at or below 10 % whichever is greater.
21
_ b. Total Section 8lamilies with children assisted by the PHA in its principal operaling area at the end of the last PHA FY.
_ 62% c. Percent of all Section 8 tamilies with children residing in low poverty census tracts in the PHA's principal operating area
at the end of tho last PHA FY (line a divided by line b).
Is line c 50 % or more? Yos No
102) a. Percent of all Section 8 tamilies with children residing in low poverty census trects in the PHA's principal operating area I'
at the end of the last completed PHA FY.
b. Number of Section 8 families with children who moved to low poverty census tracts during the last completed PHA FY. i
c. Number of Section 8 families with chiidren who moved durir.g the last completed PHA FY.
_ d. Percent of all Section 8 mover families with children who moved to low poverty census tracts during the last PHA fiscal
year (line b divided by line c).
Is I;ne d at 'east two percentage points higher than line a? Yes F-I No a
3) a. Percent of all Section 8 famiiies with children residing in low poverty census tracts in the PHA's principal operatin; area
at the end of the second to last completed PHA FY.
b. NumberofSection8familieswithchildrenwhomovedtolowpovertycensustradsduringthelasttwocompletedPHAFYs.
c. Number of Section B famiiies with chiidren who moved during the last two completed PHA FYs.
d. Percont ol all Section 8 movPr families with children who moved to low poverty census tracts over the last two completed
PHA FYs (line b divided by line c).
Is line d at ic:ist two percenlage points higher than line a? Ves L_I No
If one of the 3 criteria above Is met, the PHA may be eligible for 5 bonus points.
See instructions above concerning honus polnts for State and regional FHAs.
9 - lorm HUD-52648 (8//2000)
Prcvious r.cSroon is obsoicte Pagc a of 4 reL 24 CFR PaA 985
ffa 91
O ~ N C
~
~ >y ~
~JZJ w
' 9 F = u
L L w O~' ~ V'
u L~ L L
~O V1 C
xO
V,^q p
0
p°~4cly~~v °
1,0~N
u~ ~ Q w r.s. = rn ~ ~ V w ~
y x, ~ •
U U V
0
a
~
y ~a, o
n Ol p
6v~i °c
.~I ~4 cq ON ci
c ~ a:i
O O 0 G
~ PI 00 VZ 0 V
I~1 ~ b ; C L` ~ (IJ ~ V.. y
o 4 cr
~ .5 d
> cd 'c o ~
a ~ ~ 4`.0E
3 a 3 E" a > ov_ Y.. o
R 'r
>
F+ F
~ O~?- ~ Ln^t n~ F~.^. i ~ ❑ >-1-• n_ -~~-r = _ ~ ' = _ = ~ - -
n
f o _ a: ~ ~o ~ s a _ ~ ~ = ~ ~ o _ , o ~ a ~ ~ ~ F ~ _ - _ _ i t, S r- , ~ ~ r
4~'i ' 51
~ ~ 0 1: n p, io . a r; : SC f='' ~ f - =--'n F, ~ = f J:
~ s _ ~ o c ~ fi' ~ ❑ ? ^ r ~ - 'r .F' ' - j n _ ~ r ? ' 7~ _ ~ f _
U"
;L n. 3. 7c
~ ` 1 ~ n ~ 'n „ _ n ~ ~ G = . . _ = >
C •n O ~ : ,o ~ • G D : T. _ ' _ r > ^ _ ' -i
? r v ^ ^ G N " G' ~ ~ ~ b =1 o J ^J ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 G n ~ ~ 'v!I t'i f G. G N ~ S
5 2 7C.
2.
j. G. -f'
7 r~11 ~ ^ r} Z.
p
r
z+' f =
= T
_ ~ j, . . . . . . .
(I C.
C ~ ❑ ~ c - ? `~`L o = ~ - ^ a ~ ~ 9 _ c'
n r x n n lf _ n~-_❑~~ on n 7~`
f + n ~1 r•• ~ 1t A J. ^ ~ ,r] tA ~
n 6 ~ 3 0 ~ ^ •r••
~ = 3 _ ' ; ~ 3 ~ y r ^ ° n ? _ - - ~ p _ ~ a' o rj,,•
~ a n ~ G~ - ~ C T c ~ ~ -
c_
" - = S ~ r ♦ . ? S ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ - n' j~2.-7
~ ~ j n r.J T ^ Z• % 7
^ 3 ^ q ~ - ?
r: ~ F, I-)
=
f ~ f' +J7+ f $ ~ S., ~ - • _ ~ n -1
t ~ V C- = r r ~ o% ~ a> v. d ~ ~ n
~ ~ ~ o n - ~ o ~ o = r a a!' = c n~ ~ r;
r. ~ =y ~ n- > > ~ ~r ~ i
7 ~ - y ` ^ 3 + - - ^ r 5 ^
x ~ n x 3
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 e 8 8.g 8, 8 8 8 8 8$ n
~ q
~ r o 'n R .R~ 'Qi,
n ~
H
M Y M M M A N N N N M M M N N
Z
<
S
N N M
0
~
O
H N N N
e Q Q p
fi ~ b O
n C e
d Y ~ "
~
~ ~ M N M y~
ds
~
~'o E
OJ ~ N N M
7
m A
M N C m
y ~ a
. ~ "
~ r ~ p C O Y1 p C p O O O N G N 1~ p p p O N
~ 0 O O O O O O O O O O b ~ U OO J' O ~ O O O O 1~0
a N a ' .a^- r"'.
m LL~ N N N N
C
> N
C ~ Y
d
V C~ S $ $ ~ e N
m
$ u
Z W C. a ~
m n
Gp~ o
p U ~
; SU~$1Y W~~ a d a a ad a o 0 BR~~y iGy iG R R o v
p6 $ $ c
7 ~
• _~~~~~~ffi
75
~
~ E F F rq
F u~ ul ~ ~ ~ w y w ~ w ~ p w
3 e ~