Loading...
1997-4843 CN/EX/G/I/VA Address t S= - - - Category pescription Name Year Plan ck. # T 1 1 I; Ni: 1JIF" N 1 Recording requested 4ty: t A.j M RELORDH ON 'Cup lul 1 City of Encinitas GKGORY J. SKI COUNTY R"E C ORDER When Recorded, Mail To: SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDEU OFFICE TIME: 3:44 PM City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY DRAINAGE EASEMENT Assessor's Parcel Project: 4 S 4 3 T- No. 258 76 W.O. No.: Gene F. Aschbrenner and Nina G. Aschbrenner, Trustees of the Ge ne and Nina Asnhhro-nnpr Family Trust daf-pd Marc-h 19, 199n hereinafter designated Grantor(s) do(es) hereby grant, bargain, convey and release unto the City of Encinitas herein designated Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement and right-of-way upon, through, under, over and across the hereinafter described real property for the installation, construction, maintenance, repair, replacement, reconstruction and inspection of an enclosed or unenclosed flood DRAINAGE channel and all structures incidental thereto, and for the flowage of any waters in, over, upon or through said channel, together with the perpetual right to remove buildings, structures, trees, bushes, undergrowth, and any other obstruction interfering with the use of said easement and right-of-way by the Grantee, its successors or assigns. To have and to hold said easement and right-of-way unto itself and unto its successors and assigns forever together with the right to convey said easement, or any portion of said easement, to other public agencies. The real property referred to hereinabove and made subject to said easement and right-of-way by this grant is situated in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, and is particularly described as follows: See Exhibit "All attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. TF/03/MS7-872wp5 1(01-03-95-7) The Grantee shall have the right to fence all or any portion of said easement herein conveyed within which there is installed or constructed an unenclosed flood drainage channel. The Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall be responsible for operating, maintaining, and keeping in good repair the above described works of improvement. The Grantor, his successors and assigns, reserves the right to enclose in a manner approve by the Grantee, its successors and assigns, any portion of an unenclosed flood drainage channel provided such enclosure is constructed or installed by a licensed contractor in accordance with plans and specifications approved by and to the satisfaction of the Grantee its successors and assigns. In granting its approval the Grantee, its successors and assigns, may impose reasonable conditions including, but not limited to, the filing by the contractor or Grantor of an adequate form of security, as approved by the City Engineer, to guarantee completion of the work. There is reserved to the Grantor, his successors and assigns, the right and privilege to use the above described land of the Grantor at any time, in any manner and for any purpose not inconsistent with the full use and enjoyment by the Grantee, its successors and assigns, of the rights and privileges herein granted. Dated this °?-�� day of 19 Gran (Signature of GRANTOR must be notarized. Attach the appropriate acknowledgement.) I certify on behalf of the City Council of the City of Encinitas, pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution of said Council adopted on November 9, 1994 that the City of Encinitas consents to the making of the foregoing Irrevocable Offer, Deed, Grant, or Subordination Agreement, and consents to recordation thereof y its duly authorized officer. Date: 1 Z D By: 0114� Alan D. Archibald Director of Engineering Services TF /03/MS7- 872wp5 2(01- 03 -95 -7) CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California S tq N i e ss. County of G O On - Toy a3 , ) ? y before me, m a r � Q h n G• Lenn icl No ta,-i R Lbir Date /n Name and Tiitle (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Pub &') personally appeared Nina G. s °� a nc'_ Name(s) of Signer(s) personally known to me proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence ' to be the person(s) whose name(s) Ware subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that h /they executed the same in f2r /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his as /their _ _• •. MARYANN G. LENNNICK signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or COMM. #1030783 n the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) U ' NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA N ? " SAN DIEGO COUNTY 0 acted, executed the instrument. F My Commission Expires —• SEPTEMBER 3,1998 WITNf SS my hand and official seal Place Notary Seal Above Signature of P is OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: Individual ' Corporate Officer — Title(s): Top of thumb here Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Attorney in Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: © 1997 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth. CA 91313 -2402 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1- 800 - 876 -6827 SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT Whereas, those parties concerned, desire to have the Deed of Trust recorded - 7 -5- h4 as File /Page No. ofd - 47-0100 subordinated to the Drainage Easement ( "DOCUMENT" hereinafter) described above as Required as a Condition of Approval of Now, therefore, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned BENEFICIARY or TRUSTEE hereby waives the priority of said Deed of Trust in favor of said DOCUMENT to the same extent as if said DOCUMENT had been executed prior to said Deed of Trust. HOME INVESTMENT AND LOAN FICA HOME THRIFT AND LOAN ASSOCIATION JULY 23, 1998 DATED BENEFICIARY OR TRUSTEE By: Title: PRESIDENT DATED BENEFICIARY OR TRUSTEE By: Title: (Signature of BENEFICIARY OR TRUSTEE must be notarized. Attach the appropriate acknowledgement.] I certify on behalf of the City Council of the City of Encinitas, pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution of said Council adopted on November 9, 1994 that the City of Encinitas consents to the making of the foregoing Subordination Agreement, and consents to recordation thereof by its duly uthorize offic Date L By Alan D. Archibald Director of Engineering Services City of Encinitas TF /03/MS7- 872wp5 3(01- 03 -95 -7) CALIFORNIA ALL - PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of SAN DIEGO ss. On JULY 23, 1998 before me, EILEEN MARIE GONZALES Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., 'Vane Doe, Notary Public ") personally appeared BYRON B. WEBB, JR. Name(s) of Signer(s) S 7 personally known to me ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence <s to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are s subscribed to the within instrument and S acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized EILEEN MAME GOWAL13 capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their Cammidan#Im6SO signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or Notary —C Cou my the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) l�eeo My Comm. Explm Oct 22.1 acted, executed the instrument. W NESS my hand and official seal. Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Pub w OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: Individual ' Corporate Officer— Title(s): Top of thumb here Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee :1 Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: © 1997 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth. CA 91313 -2402 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1- 800 - 876 -6827 EXHIBIT A CITY OF ENCINITAS DRAINAGE EASEMENT PARCEL E, F AND G OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, DOC. NO. 97- 0319853 IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON JULY 7, 1997. PURPOSE: AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER, ACROSS AND UNDER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND. EASEMENT ( DRAINAGE) THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SBBM; IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNINING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15; THENCE NORTH 88 °56'21" WEST 430.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15; THENCE NORTH 1 0 33'38" EAST 851.96 FEET ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE STREET KNOWN AS CAMINO EL DORADO; THENCE NORTH 88 °51'23" WEST 25.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 °51'23" WEST 335.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 °46'32" EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °51'23" EAST 167.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1 0 40'35" EAST 20.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °56'21" EAST 10.00' FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1'40'35" WEST 20.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °51'23" EAST 158.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 °33'38" EAST 10.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINING. PARCEL -E, PARCEL -F AND PARCEL -G ARE EFFECTED BY THIS EASEMENT. SERia ROBERT B. SERVICE LS 4456 o �i EXP. 9/30/01 • EXHIBIT 'B' . m . DRAINAGE EASEMENT PARCEL E, F & G OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE DOC. NO. 97- 0319853 o _ CL. OCEAN BLUFF WAY I PARCEL - C 0 I 00 i u PARCEL - D I Q -- 0 PARCEL - B C) I -- 0 0 Q o -C:) � Z I Q Q o - - O J U O CD PARCEL - E PARCEL - A w 0 N n Q r') I M U (o I I S88'56'21 "E 10.00' N01 "E 20.95' I o z S01'40'35 "W 20.97' V ' - S88'51'23 "E 167.56' 588'51'23 "E 158.31' N 88'51'23" W 335.91' W TPOB. z `° � Z i l O l rn �n ° o w o PARCEL - G CEL - F "' 0 00 N r = rn SEfiOM �o 'o c0 EV.943Ga1 00 0 Ln Na 44% Z Z �o 00 Z R.O.S. NO. 15593 PREPARED BY S.E. COR. OF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 15, T135, '�G Z R4W, SBBM ROBERT B. SERVICE L.S. 4456 EXP. 9/30/01 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING PREPARED FOR: 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, STE. G, ESCONDIDO CA 92029 GENE F. & NINA G. ASCHBRENNER (760) 746 -4955 515 CAMINO DE ORCHIDA ENCINITAS 1 - 5U- NAL OF THIS 110C"JJ,jEJ'4T Recording Requead By: 0;JIL.U!"llu 1, 111 U � I WAS P-L`LIRDED Y 11 -JJUL-19x City of Encinitas 11110CUINERT HUINEIR' 1 R !-;`-R` i NTT y U J - It REIME, R When Recorded Mail to nlil r�� r : 1. �.H DT UUL111 I R L 1, 0 ["R I S 0 F I' IC_ City Clerk City of Encinitas 505 South Vulcan Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY )SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY EASEMENT FOR CITY HIGHWAY Assessor's Parcel Project No.• No. 258- 140 - 01,02 ,03,04 W.O. No.• — Gene F. Aschbrenner and Nina G. Aschbrenner, Trustees of the Gene and Nina Aschbrenner Family Trust dated March 12, 1990 hereinafter called GRANTOR(S), do(es) hereby grant, convey and dedicate to the CITY OF ENCINITAS, State of California, hereinafter called GRANTEE, the right of way and incidents thereto for a public highway upon, over and across that certain real property in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT "All ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY THIS REFERENCE, cov4054 The Grantor hereby further grants to the CI'iL OF ENCINITAS the privilege and right to extend drainage structures and excavation and embankment slopes beyond the limits of the herein described right -of -way where required for the construction and maintenance of said CITY Highway. RESERVING unto grantor of the above described parcel of land, his successors or assigns, the right to eliminate such slopes and /or drainage structures or portions thereof, when in the written opinion of the City Engineer of Grantee, the necessity therefore is removed by substituting other protection, support and /or drainage facility, provided such substitution is - first approved in writing by the City Engineer. The Grantor hereby further grants to Grantee all trees, growths (growing or that may hereafter grow), and road building materials within said right -of -way, including the right to take water, together with the right to use the same in such manner and at such locations as said Grantee may deem proper, needful or necessary, in the construction, reconstruction, improvement or maintenance 'of said highway. The Grantor, for himself, his successors and assigns, hereby waives any claim for any and all damages to Grantor's remaining property contiguous to the right -of -way hereby conveyed by reason of the location, construction, landscaping or maintenance of said highway. Dated this lkM day of MARC* , 191' OWN F GENE F. ASCHBRE CJ 'NNER 2 /' �YL ; A. rAA G'l? cwt NINA G. ASCHBRENNER Signature of Owners to be notarized. Attach the appropriate acknowledgements. I certify on behalf of the City Council of the City of Encinitas, pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution of said Council adopted on November 9, 1994 that the City of Encinitas consents to the making of the foregoing Right -of -Way Dedicatis to recordation thereof by its duly hor' a of i Date: 1( By: Alan D. Archibald Director of Engineering Services City of Encinitas cov4054 2 CALIFORNIA ALL -PURFOE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of C—A L i ro R N iA County of .5A N r); EC- D r On Aafie Cl4 1q, l 99q before me, � K / h lc•e - . Sw efnso n 0 NoTa N Ahli-- , Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., `Jane Doe, Notary Public") personally appeared GENE F ���(� kEZ N 9y JV �N A G ASCN8�2ElVi1/, , Name(s) of Signer(s) ❑ personally known to me - OR ' < roved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)-is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that 4w/she /they executed the same in hisAaer /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by hWher /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, JANICE K. SWENSON executed the instrument. l ip, COMM. i 1030780 Notary PUbdc — CoNtornio SAN DIEGO COUNTY WITNESS my hand and o ' ial seal. V Camm. Ezpb1111111 JUN 22, 1998 s G gnature of Notary Public TIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: iE EWT n:2 /- C i % Document Date: AMA? 0-6 1 y l 9 7:7 Number of Pages: 3 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ,A-4=A /Y D, A-f2eh a,4-f--r-> Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: U� Individual ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ® Trustee ❑ Trustee _ ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Othe Top of thumb here ❑ Other: Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: Lq 0 1994 National Notary Association - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91309 -7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder. Call Toll -Free 1- 800.876.6827 SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, those parties concerned, desire to have the Deed of Trust recorded July 5, 9 4 as File /Page N 420106 subordinated to Easement for City Highway for W N/A hereinafter) required as condition of approval of ; Now, therefore, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned BENEFICIARY or TRUSTEE hereby waives the priority of said Deed of Trust in favor of said DOCUMENT to the same extent as if said DOCUMENT had been executed prior to said Deed of Trust. HOME INVESTMENT AND LOAN FICA HOME THRIFT AND LOAN ASSOCIATION M C. Li zy, tG1q DATED BENEFICIARY OR TRUSTEE By • Title: DATED BENEFICIARY OR TRUSTEE By: Title: Signature of BENEFICIARY or TRUSTEE must be notarized. Attach the appropriate acknowledgement. I certify on behalf of the City Council of the City of Encinitas, pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution of said Council adopted on November 9, 1994 that the City of Encinitas consents to the making of the foregoing Subordination Agreement, and consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date BY k � 1�j - Alan D. Archibald Director of Engineering Services City of Encinitas cov4054 3 CALIFORNIA ALL- PURFOE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of San Die o On March 25, 1997 before me, Jerome M. Schlife Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., - Jane Doe, Notary Public" personally appeared Byron B. Webb, Jr. Names) of Signer(s) ' 13personally known to me – OR – ❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the 'QOM E M. S same in his/her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by BE C OM pN1M. s 1025 5 784 his/her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), C 7114 NOW PU c.cKt�awu► or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, Mr 0080 ��4►, toofr executed the instrument. WITNESS y hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public OPT/ NAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: • Individual ❑ Individual • Corporate Officer ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Trustee _ ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Top of thumb here ❑ Other: Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: 0 1994 National Notary Association - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91309 -7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder. Call Toll -Free 1- 804876 -6827 EXIIIBIT "A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SBBM; IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15; THENCE NORTH 88 °56'21" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15 A DISTANCE OF 429.84 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1 0 35'36" EAST ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 15, A DISTANCE OF 653.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 1 °35'36" EAST 649.19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15 DISTANT THEREON 429.84 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 88 0 03'22" WEST 385.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 °46'32" WEST 655.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 0 56'21" EAST ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 15 387.76 FEET; THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EASEMENT AREA SAID ROADWAY EASEMENT TO AFFECT THE FOLLOWING PORTIONS OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. THE WESTERLY 25.00 FEET, TOGETHER WITH THE NORTHERLY 25.00 FEET ALSO TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, SAID CURVE BEING TANGENT TO BOTH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WESTERLY 25.00 FEET AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHERLY 25.00 FEET. ALSO TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, SAID CURVE BEING TANGENT TO BOTH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHERLY 25.00 FEET AND A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 25 FEET WESTERLY MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. j ti p,N D S C. 4 U No. ~2 ' - C ' 9 CIFG � `'- CITY H HwAY EASEMENT PEAT 6 DORA Do S - r N 88 ° 03'22 W 38S G7' R =20 � 258 - 140 - o 1 0 258- 140 -OZ J 258- 140 -03 l v I� cq 3 la¢ ' l Ian Cl -` o I 258 -1�0 -13 14 )E T /ON NE V4 SEC /5 t T /3S R4 W S81 l ko t m I Z � I I W I ` S 88 °5G' 21 "C 3 87.76' T, P, 0,6 v S � 4 PROPEPTY Sri v � REQUEZA . ) o ST 4-29 84 EXHIBIT A CITY OF ENCINITAS EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY ON PARCEL A, B, D, E, OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, DOC. NO. 97- 0319853 IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON JULY 7, 1997. PURPOSE: AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER, ACROSS AND UNDER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND. EASEMENT -1 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SBBM; IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNINING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15; THENCE NORTH 88 °56'21" WEST 430.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15; THENCE NORTH 1 0 33'38" EAST 878.18 FEET ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE STREET KNOWN AS CAMINO EL DORADO; THENCE NORTH 88 °56'21" WEST 17.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1'33'38" EAST 232.28 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A 25.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH WEST THENCE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89 0 38'43" WITH AN ARC LENGTH OF 39.12 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 88 °05'05" WEST 150.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 0 54'55" WEST 8.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °05'05" EAST 147.91 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89 0 38'43" WITH AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.29 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 1'33'38" WEST 106.78 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 0 33'38" WEST 122.59 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 88 °56'21" EAST 8.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINING. PARCEL -E AND PARCEL -D ARE EFFECTED BY THIS EASEMENT. SEMM ROBERT B. SERVICE LS 4456 EXP. 9/30/01 EASEMENT -2 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SBBM; IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNINING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15; THENCE NORTH 88 °56'21" WEST 430.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15; THENCE NORTH 1 0 33'38" EAST 851.96 FEET ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE STREET KNOWN AS CAMINO EL DORADO; THENCE NORTH 88 °51'23" WEST 360.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1 EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1'46'32" EAST 1.21 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 °56'21" WEST 8.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 EAST 173.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °56'21" EAST 8.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 0 46'32" WEST 86.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 0 46'32" WEST 86.59 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINING. PARCEL -A AND PARCEL -B ARE EFFECTED BY THIS EASEMENT. r ROKK Bf�CE SEWU ROBERT B. SERVICE LS 4456 Ev. 6, EXP. 9/30/01 CITY OF ENCINITAS DRAINAGE EASEMENT PARCEL E, F AND G OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, DOC. NO. 97- 0319853 IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON JULY 7, 1997. PURPOSE: AN EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER, ACROSS AND UNDER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND. EASEMENT —3 ( DRAINAGE) THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SBBM; IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNINING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15; THENCE NORTH 88 °56'21" WEST 430.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15; THENCE NORTH 1 0 33'38" EAST 851.96 FEET ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE STREET KNOWN AS CAMINO EL DORADO; THENCE NORTH 88 °51'23" WEST 25.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 °51'23" WEST 335.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 0 46'32" EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °51'23" EAST 167.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1'40'35" EAST 20.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °56'21" EAST 10.00' FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1'40'35" WEST 20.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °51'23" EAST 158.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 °33'38" EAST 10.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINING. PARCEL -A, PARCEL -E, PARCEL -F AND PARCEL -G ARE EFFECTED BY THIS EASEMENT. RoeEar elU ROBERT B. SERVICE LS 4456 EX. E t EXP. 9/30/01 G * EXH6lf B • m RIGHT OF WAY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT PARCEL A, B, D, E & F OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE DOC. NO. 97- 0319853 S01'54'55 "W 8.00' ,� �5 • y� N88'05 05 W 150.89' S8'0'0 00 EASEMENT -1 855 "E w EASEMENT -2 147.91' w (R /W) L= 31.29' (.0 �= 89'38'43" ao PARCEL - C R= 20.00' o 00 0 i O 00 PARCEL - D � 00 - - n 00 r7 N O r PARCEL - B `n ` w S01'46'32 "W 86.67' 00 o °' M ° �' ° o (R /W) ° N z O Cl ° •` ° co — — — N W r ``' N PARCEL - E �n z S01'46'32 "W 86.59' o Lo Lo N m co PARCEL - A o i � ° •"' o TPOB. z 00 N z 00 N01'46'32 "E 1.21' _ _ S 88'56'21" E 8.00' z - S88'51'23 "E 167.56' S01'33'38 "E 10.00' S88'S1'23 E 158.31 ^o° N 88'51'23" W 335.91' - 00 C) TPOB. i °o N 00 a EASEMENT -3 N88'51'23 "W 25.00' °�' o N 00 o w w ° o !i' (DRAINAGE) N88'51'23 "W 360.91' 00 J - ° PARCEL - G w w co o !� z PARCEL - F i� Q O N U z z 10 z U co Ex R09E;�i'f OKE z Sam N0.1� 456 � R.O.S. NO. 15593 PREPARED BY S.E. COR. OF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 15, T135, �G R4W, SBBM ROBERT B. SERVICE L.S. 4456 EXP. 9/30/01 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING PREPARED FOR: 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, STE. G, ESCONDIDO CA 92029 GENE F. & NINA G. ASCHBRENNER (760) 746 -4955 515 CAMINO DE ORCHIDA ENCINITAS 1 ��o� ��, CONSTRUCTION STING & ENGINEERING, INC. s �4� SAN DIEGO, CA • RIVERSIDE, CA VENTURA, CA • TRACY, CA LANCASTER, CA C.> �. 2414 Vineyard Ave. 490 E. Princeland Ct. 1645 Pacific Ave. 392 W. larch Rd. 42156 10th St. W O C ~ Suite G Suite 7 Suite 105 Suite 19 Unit K G Escondido, CA 92029 Corona, CA 91719 Oxnard, CA 93033 Tracy, CA 95376 Lancaster, CA 93534 (760) 746.4955 (909) 371.1890 (805) 486.6475 (209) 839 -2890 (805) 726-9676 ENGINEERING, INC. (760) 746 -9806 FAx (909) 371 -2168 FAx (805) 486-9016 FAX (209) 839-2895 FAx (805) 726-9676 FAx STORM DRAIN CALCULATIONS PARCEL A, B, D & E OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, DOC 97- 0319853 ENCINITAS PREPARED FOR GENE F. & NINA G. ASCHBRENNER 1 515 CAMINO DE ORCHIDA ENCINITAS PREPARED BY CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 CTE JOB NO. 10 -2597 JUNE 26, 1998 GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION CONSTRUCTION RSTING& ENGINEERING, INC. s �4� � SAN DIEGO, CA RIVERSIDE, CA VENTURA, CA TRACY, CA LANCASTER, CA 2414 Vineyard Ave. 490 E. Princeland Ct. 1645 Pacific Ave 392 W. Larch Rd. 42156 10th SL W. O� Suite G Suite 7 Suite 105 Suite 19 Unit K G Escondido, CA 92029 Corona, CA 91719 Oxnard, CA 93033 Tracy, CA 95376 Lancaster, CA 93534 (760) 746 -4955 (909) 371 -1890 (805) 4866475 (209) 839-2890 (805) 72(-9676 ENGINEERING, INC. (760) 746-9806 FAX (909) 371 -2168 FAX (805) 4869016 FAX (209) 839 -2895 FAX (805) 7269676 FAX STORM DRAIN CALCULATIONS PARCEL A, B, D & E OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, DOC 97- 0319853 ENCINITAS Q RoF ESSIO , PREPARED FOR Ilk; S V 64 GENE F. & NINA G. ASCHBRENNER 515 CAMINO DE ORCHIDA ENCII�TITAS � U 452 2 � FXP. 4 sj C1V1\- �TF OF C NZ PREPARED PREPARED BY CURTIS V. OLANDER DATE R.C.E. NO. 45282 EXP 09 -30-98 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 CTE JOB NO. 10 -2597 GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 09v TI VF : TO 512F STORM W,411V PIAE,S I - o R T #E pR oP©SEG' REtS/ DEl✓ -T f, I��VEG �P/ JE/V T A551VItI P 7 1 n= 013 V L OI Pr 2 ,� /�E SIZES �SGaP�S FRO/'; GRApI/16- IVLpN 3• 1JlS�f//1�GE f'LOG,/,S F"RDM f/ ypQaG ©�-r �"�GL Dot - rF D AIA NNIIV6G �5 4-Q T /ON Q ± A R 213 S /z n FOR �PVC• A= x �Z �� o Sir y R = 9// 2- = D � O E�Z 5 �SSUMI�►/G- F vG � FG�� 2/3 _- 9 — xa o O aJ o - 0/3 4° 13 Cis . I3AslN Q = 0 �42 C. S• (FKOM' RAToN(AL 1E Y HOD- `� vs� 9 X 3 4, R 711A( D n/o 0/- 3 ,olPE 0 3,7� 0 .13 SEE A r7,�� N Frj 'I(�ES� JSE Z X 3 y D //�E S {;7.� NO. 3 0 -/3 U,5 F- y x3 PIPE SA-S Xt Q= O 3 ! IVO 0, 3 P/PF = ' = 2 o •�3 V s I= 3 X E 1914S/N - T YP �e 1v . NO P PE 1512 E RFd vIR © . • • PROJECT CALC DATE BASIN # STATION AREA REFERENCE .057 (50 SCALE) AREA X .918 (200 SCALE) _ acres .021 (21 SCALE) COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF: C (CONSIDER PROBABLE DEVELOPMENT) DEVELOPED AREAS (URBAN) COEFFICIENT "C" SOIL TYPE % LAND USE A B C D RESIDENTIAL ✓ SINGLE FAMILY 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 MULTI -UNITS 0.45 0.5 0.6 0.7 MOBILE HOMES 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.65 RURAL (LOTS GREATER THAN 1/2 ACRE) 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 COMMERCIAL (2) 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 80% IMPERVIOUS INDUSTRIAL (2) 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 90% IMPERVIOUS C= �' S✓� CA= Z TIME OF CONCENTRATION Tc Tc1 :OVERLAND FLOW Tc2: GUTTER FLOW �S 3 STREET LENGTH = ft @ 2 % APPROX AVE VEL = fps Tc1 min Tc2 = min. Tc= Tc1 +Tc2 = /Q min RUNOFF: Q =1 X CA ALTITUDE FACTOR (CHART C) 150= / X3.5 " /hr 0, 9L cfs USE Q50 0 • qZ cfs FACTOR ��,{ NJ ' 12- = 1100= X " /hr cfs USE Q10 cfs FACTOR REFERENCE : SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DESIGN AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 1. OBTAIN SOIL TYPE FROM APPENDICES IX -C1 THROUGH IX -C4 2. OBTAIN OVERLAND FLOW Tci FROM APP. X -C 3. OBTAIN APPROX. AVERAGE VELOCITY FROM APP. X -D 4. OBTAIN RAINFALL INTENSITY FROM APP. X I .PROJECT 9893 - G CALC DATE 6 - 2G - 98 BASIN # Z STATION AREA REFERENCE .057 (50 SCALE) AREA X .918 (200 SCALE) _ © 2 5 acres .021 (21 SCALE) COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF: C (CONSIDER PROBABLE DEVELOPMENT) DEVELOPED AREAS (URBAN) COEFFICIENT "C" SOIL TYPE % LAND USE A B C D RESIDENTIAL D 55 SINGLE FAMILY 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 MULTI -UNITS 0.45 0.5 0.6 0.7 MOBILE HOMES 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.65 RURAL (LOTS GREATER THAN 1/2 ACRE) 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 COMMERCIAL (2) 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 80% IMPERVIOUS INDUSTRIAL (2) 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 90% IMPERVIOUS C= p. CA= D • / `/ TIME OF CONCENTRATION Tc Tc1 :OVERLAND FLOW Tc2: GUTTER FLOW 169 STREET LENGTH = ft @ 2 % APPROX AVE VEL = fps Tc1 = /Q min Tc2 = min. Tc= Tc1 +Tc2 = /Q min RUNOFF: Q =1 X CA ALTITUDE FACTOR (CHART C) 150= / X,�•oS " /hr q� cfs USE Q50 Q •q 9 cfs FACTOR 1100= X " /hr cfs USE Q10 cfs FACTOR REFERENCE : SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DESIGN AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 1. OBTAIN SOIL TYPE FROM APPENDICES IX -C1 THROUGH IX -C4 2. OBTAIN OVERLAND FLOW Tci FROM APP. X -C 3. OBTAIN APPROX. AVERAGE VELOCITY FROM APP. X -D 4. OBTAIN RAINFALL INTENSITY FROM APP. X I i •PROJECT CALC DATE 6_zG BASIN # 3 STATION AREA REFERENCE .057 (50 SCALE) AREA X .918 (200 SCALE) = ©, 7 acres .021 (21 SCALE) COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF: C (CONSIDER PROBABLE DEVELOPMENT) DEVELOPED AREAS (URBAN) COEFFICIENT "C" SOIL TYPE % LAND USE A B C D RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 MULTI -UNITS 0.45 0.5 0.6 0.7 MOBILE HOMES 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.65 RURAL (LOTS GREATER THAN 1/2 ACRE) 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 COMMERCIAL (2) 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 80% IMPERVIOUS INDUSTRIAL (2) 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 90% IMPERVIOUS C= p 5� CA= G TIME OF CONCENTRATION Tc Tc1 :OVERLAND FLOW Tc2: GUTTER FLOW STREET LENGTH = ft 260 ' @ Z % APPROX AVE VEL = fps Tc1 = 12_ min Tc2 = min. Tc= Tc1 +Tc2 = 12 min RUNOFF: CIA X CA ALTITUDE FACTOR (CHART C) 150= / X 3 " /hr Q , $ cfs USE Q50 cfs FACTOR X o = 1 100= X " /hr cfs USE Q10 cfs FACTOR REFERENCE : SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DESIGN AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 1. OBTAIN SOIL TYPE FROM APPENDICES IX -C1 THROUGH IX -C4 2. OBTAIN OVERLAND FLOW Tcl FROM APP. X -C 3. OBTAIN APPROX. AVERAGE VELOCITY FROM APP. X -D 4. OBTAIN RAINFALL INTENSITY FROM APP. X I . • PROJECT 9S 43 - G CALC DATE BASIN # STATION AREA REFERENCE .057 (50 SCALE) — ©09 AREA X .918 (200 SCALE) acres .021 (21 SCALE) COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF: C (CONSIDER PROBABLE DEVELOPMENT) DEVELOPED AREAS (URBAN) COEFFICIENT "C" SOIL TYPE % LAND USE A B C D RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 MULTI -UNITS 0.45 0.5 0.6 0.7 MOBILE HOMES 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.65 RURAL (LOTS GREATER THAN 1/2 ACRE) 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 COMMERCIAL (2) 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 80% IMPERVIOUS INDUSTRIAL (2) 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 90% IMPERVIOUS C= O vl5 CA= o. o,5 TIME OF CONCENTRATION Tc Tc1 :OVERLAND FLOW Tc2: GUTTER FLOW STREET LENGTH = ft /6 2— ' @ Z % APPROX AVE VEL = fps Tc1 = /p min Tc2 = min. Tc= Tc1 +Tc2 min RUNOFF: Q =1 X CA ALTITUDE FACTOR (CHART C) ,�r 150= / XSr" /hr O ' cfs USE 050 04. cfs FACTOR x O OS = 1100= X " /hr cfs USE Q10 cfs FACTOR REFERENCE : SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DESIGN AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 1. OBTAIN SOIL TYPE FROM APPENDICES IX -C1 THROUGH IX -C4 2. OBTAIN OVERLAND FLOW Tci FROM APP. X -C 3. OBTAIN APPROX. AVERAGE VELOCITY FROM APP. X -D 4. OBTAIN RAINFALL INTENSITY FROM APP. X I • *PROJECT 49 413 r G CALC DATE BASIN # STATION AREA REFERENCE .057 (50 SCALE) AREA X .918 (200 SCALE) _ �' 2 ✓ ? acres .021 (21 SCALE) COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF: C (CONSIDER PROBABLE DEVELOPMENT) DEVELOPED AREAS (URBAN) COEFFICIENT "C" SOIL TYPE % LAND USE A B C D RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 MULTI -UNITS 0.45 0.5 0.6 0.7 MOBILE HOMES 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.65 RURAL (LOTS GREATER THAN 1/2 ACRE) 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 COMMERCIAL (2) 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 80% IMPERVIOUS INDUSTRIAL (2) 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 90% IMPERVIOUS C _ CA= TIME OF CONCENTRATION Tc Tc1 :OVERLAND FLOW Tc2: GUTTER FLOW 15 STREET LENGTH = ft @ 2 % APPROX AVE VEL = fps Tc1 min Tc2 = min. Tc= Tc1 +Tc2 = /Q min RUNOFF: Q =1 X CA ALTITUDE FACTOR (CHART C) 150= / X3:S /hr -15- cfs USE Q50 �'9 cfs FACTOR X 0' /,3 = 1 100= X " /hr cfs USE Q10 cfs FACTOR REFERENCE : SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DESIGN AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 1. OBTAIN SOIL TYPE FROM APPENDICES IX -C1 THROUGH IX -C4 2. OBTAIN OVERLAND FLOW Tct FROM APP. X -C 3. OBTAIN APPROX. AVERAGE VELOCITY FROM APP. X -D 4. OBTAIN RAINFALL INTENSITY FROM APP. X I • !PROJECT CALC DATE 6 BASIN # 6 STATION AREA REFERENCE .057 (50 SCALE) _ D !6 AREA X .918 (200 SCALE ) acres .021 (21 SCALE) COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF: C (CONSIDER PROBABLE DEVELOPMENT) DEVELOPED AREAS (URBAN) COEFFICIENT "C" SOIL TYPE % LAND USE A B C D RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 ° s5 MULTI -UNITS 0.45 0.5 0.6 0.7 MOBILE HOMES 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.65 RURAL (LOTS GREATER THAN 1/2 ACRE) 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 COMMERCIAL (2) 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 80% IMPERVIOUS INDUSTRIAL (2) 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 90% IMPERVIOUS C= ©'S� CA= Q ' 0 TIME OF CONCENTRATION Tc Tc1 :OVERLAND FLOW Tc2: GUTTER FLOW STREET LENGTH = ft @ Z % APPROX AVE VEL = fps Tc1 min Tc2 = min. Tc= Tc1 +Tc2 min RUNOFF: Q =1 X CA ALTITUDE FACTOR (CHART C) 150= )�3•5 /hr cfs USE Q50 cfs FACTOR 1 100= X " /hr cfs USE Q10 cfs FACTOR REFERENCE : SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DESIGN AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 1. OBTAIN SOIL TYPE FROM APPENDICES IX -C1 THROUGH IX -C4 2. OBTAIN OVERLAND FLOW Tcl FROM APP. X -C 3. OBTAIN APPROX. AVERAGE VELOCITY FROM APP. X -D 4. OBTAIN RAINFALL INTENSITY FROM APP. X I . • PROJECT CALC DATE BASIN # 7 STATION AREA REFERENCE .057 (50 SCALE) AREA X .918 (200 SCALE) _ �' �6 acres .021 (21 SCALE) COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF: C (CONSIDER PROBABLE DEVELOPMENT) DEVELOPED AREAS (URBAN) COEFFICIENT "C" SOIL TYPE % LAND USE A B C D RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0 ✓ MULTI -UNITS 0.45 0.5 0.6 0.7 MOBILE HOMES 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.65 RURAL (LOTS GREATER THAN 1/2 ACRE) 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 COMMERCIAL (2) 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 80% IMPERVIOUS INDUSTRIAL (2) 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 90% IMPERVIOUS C= D SS CA= 0' TIME OF CONCENTRATION Tc Tc1 :OVERLAND FLOW Tc2: GUTTER FLOW _ STREET LENGTH = ft 75 @ 2 % APPROX AVE VEL = fps Tc1 min Tc2 = min. Tc= Tc1 +Tc2 = /Q min RUNOFF: Q =1 X CA ALTITUDE FACTOR (CHART C) 150= V•,' /hr cfs USE Q50 ' 31 cfs FACTOR q 1 100= X " /hr cfs USE Q10 cfs FACTOR REFERENCE : SAN DIEGO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DESIGN AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 1. OBTAIN SOIL TYPE FROM APPENDICES IX -C1 THROUGH IX -C4 2. OBTAIN OVERLAND FLOW Tct FROM APP. X -C 3. OBTAIN APPROX. AVERAGE VELOCITY FROM APP. X -D 4. OBTAIN RAINFALL INTENSITY FROM APP. X I VI°b IX XIQN3ddd • O I I I; I I i 1 . _I I i fit Ll I I I 1 I - -� —I I - .l__. _� -•t- 1 I -- - -- - I I I T I i I - - - - --- _f 3 O O -� _ C7 •'� H H � _ _ -- •- - - - - -- N N 0 N (V I 1 1 1 1 l i l -- - -•�- i :: , I I N v •t7 �„� �C j -- - -- -- - •mil --�.- V Iwf r p 1 J qLn N O t 7t O Zn O t Tl O to O to O (sa4OUL) UOLjR4 jdL3aad jnoy -g z c v v v v v •p v v v v v ..-�. ...� -+ t+ N - +• t+ -1 .� O O •'O t-+ e-+ c+ - n o n CL rn (D r) - --A O = = ci (D a = -Pl. -s .-r p+ (D -+- O a U co at v. to O (D O -•• p C u (D t+ an r+ :1: c+ t-+ 0 t+ C to = 3 O to n c - + _ (D N N to a (D - S O C+ �j t'+ O O J (D a (D CA CA •P -+- f+ O Z Q m O a O + n= 'S = tT ru —W a (D p 0 - n t (D =r - "S t'+ - 1 O — 'D a o o t+ * -n O O at v . to S Q. O to O _•. -- S ... a t ( =3 to (=D CD v a = 'o D . i • N O to c+ ^s - s -�- -s Ul - S c+ r+ - v •p C tT r+ _ 0 (D t+ O J (D to CI - O 0 to C � - d � n t1 O - S 00 t p. . +. N aG r. to . +. _+. _.. C d -'- 'S O a ._ tl (D t+ + e (D t O \ (D n N vl O a = =r c O (D = O+ a = o a. (D -a o r+ o G) O -' to (D O O Z t+ ri N1 o -n QN t< o = a = t< -+ to � p , 3 ( �G O O n w v -' (p � a t �• O (D -• t+ m rr 2 CA d O B = n (D '% a ITT - S = O --h --h - -I (D I--I n t+ -- I I ON "o a - O O C+ N Cl) n -�- I 'T7 �p G O A -'• 'S •S tJ (SI (D -+• C '•'h (D \ t f. z p X n � I L7• --3 `2 0 r, C, 'D C), V I O +. x - s • r+ to tG o n (D t-y -+• O N C C= C -� f7 a Cl_ 2 (D - S DO . -Tt � fD O Q • c E — -'S ' < a n G o (D (D O 7 t-+ O to O -+ L1 Q O = --h O O Z -Z (D r+ :f] -- S t•< bihd - nI IX XIQN3ddd IT IWO rrl O CN rt rt CD IF o ld IWO 61- t ' — -' '— — - -- to ' G .. .— J I _ _ -- - -- — ,-} •=--'� --ice -- �•� W \ � /__ __ _ _ _ _ __ __ 1 •--� N O to O tJt O to O to O to O (saq :)UL UOL4P4jdl3aad anoH -g z n -P. W N ' O D cn A W N •--� p .� fD �--� C+ D 'V N -+• r+ --1 - 0 Cl O 'O r+ r+ rr - n 0 A CL ON CD n ? -� -1 -.% -- O O' O• a. O a O• .p - rt a fD -�- O a C.7 CD a V. to O m -• • (� p C tl [D t+ N rt r► C+ p C-11 C C to O• a O v J V) n — • — ' co _ CD N to to a tD 'T O r't• N r+ O O tD all m ON to iN -+- rt O -+ en Z CL t1 a o n? - S ? O a a Cu CD " 1 D CA m 3 en m IMP V+ •a - v :E - V a = �. > . u 3 - 0 • • to C+ - S - -S c,, -S rt CO. •a -a c Cr r+ s a m rt -1.3 o ::> rD w a -o I J .. tD CD =' ••S n n = - S n C+ at O �. N 1 G to �• to �. .. �• C CL -�• S O a a \ O =r C r+ C+ "S O r+ eT a ? c+ c+ a a =r o r+ rt n -J . tD O m rt rt rt tD rt. O tD S sr O a:3 fir• no 3 CD CL M - 0 O C - (` — N O Q .� a --J• =3 l < to -�• N v Z N l< o o �� no . -ii M m a -+ CL t -11• O fD --' e+ tD rt �o r+ r + o w m C+ O _ -s =r o -w -+ - 0 tD _ �. ail7 tD n b O P n O a te +. • 3 .�2n O 1 Z to 3 v •'7 CD n rl• CD M - A o tD rr �• o w c c S x m -S -z to a rn -s m lc a X ' " G r+ CntG tZ o- n [D O a CD CD =s �.._ � _� -A e O to a -. CL O � '••b O O =r"< L60-01. 'ON 8O{• 313 SS.6i -9/L ML) 6ZOZ6 V3 OOIGN3;ia3 O 31S •3rN3AV QWA3N{A 1142 3Nt 'ON9133WIN3 V ON{iS31 NOt1Oi1'd1SNO3 H tic Lr ij 19c r F W + A Y 39143d }3 M3NNO iY ilY1S _ ivui ctn &MYA Car- -3!G KVS i.8 1 O3LYOOl36 38 Oi - QAH 3S — and .F X3 n Z—O Ma SY • w4no -P &lo v vrc -3rd - )(3 _ : r o fy am E oi " �l l j 3 i pa 11 ! f • \ 1 i NO 3 (i oc II - -t ti i A + T I Y as a MM 111 .11 t"MY A i _ L T as s ntt _ _ Ei I I 1 1 1 p [ i I 5 I Li I ! 'iii CA T i it !E i dx,- I I i l�w i! I! C4 I i \ �! utl \ \ J WWI —LOS g Alf and y a3M3S_0A4 . g q 4 ail E Ij i I LA M �9 � ; E :7 1 _ 3 e g ti 'v E `zCi '�4 b �U CONSTRUCTION STING & ENGINEERING, INC. SAN DIEGO, CA RIVERSIDE, CA VENTURA, CA TRACY, CA LANCASTER, CA C 2414 Vineyard Ave. 490 E. Princeland Ct. 1645 Pacific Ave. 242 W. Larch 4215610th St. W. Suite G Suite 7 Suite 105 Suite F Unit K GO� Escondido, CA 92029 Corona, CA 91719 Oxnard, CA 93033 Tracy, CA 95376 Lancaster, CA 93534 (760) 746.4955 (909) 371 -1890 (661) 486 -6475 (209) 839 -2890 (661)726.9676 ENGINEERING, INC. (760) 746.9806 FAx (909) 371-2168 FAX (661) 486 -9016 FAx (209) 839.2895 FAx (661) 726-9676 FAx July 25, 2000 CTE Job No. 10 -3487 Tony Cassolato Proteus Development 701 `B" Street San Diego, CA 92121 Subject: Final Report for Testing of Compacted Fills for Building Pad Parcel E Camino El Dorado and Ocean Bluff Way Encinitas, California Reference Report: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Encinitas Residential Development APN 258 -140- 01,02,03 Camino El Dorado and Camino De Orchida Encinitas, California Prepared by CTE dated April 15, 1998 Mr. Cassolato The attached report updates and documents our observations and tests performed on fill materials for building pad area, designated as Parcel E. Based on our testing and observation, earthwork was performed in general accordance with the recommendations provided in the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, dated August 5, 1999. The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding our recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. odney . Ba Manager, Geotechnical Engineering FAIO.7487%0 Compecticn of Building Pd, Peal E.doc GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION CONSTRUCTION RSTING& ENGINEERING, INC. SAN DIEGO, CA RIVERSIDE, CA VENTURA, CA TRACY, CA LANCASTER, CA C 2414 Vineyard Ave. 490 E. Princeland Ct. 1645 Pacific Ave. 242 W. Larch 4215610th St. W. Suite G Suite 7 Suite 105 Suite F Unit K G Escondido, CA 92029 Corona, CA 91719 Oxnard, CA 93033 Tracy, CA 95376 Lancaster, CA 93534 (760) 746.4955 (909) 371.1890 (661) 486.6475 (209)839.2890 (661) 726 -9676 ENGINEERING, INC. (760) 746.9806 FAx (909) 371.2168 FAx (661) 486.9016 FAx (209) 839.2895 FAx (661) 726 -9676 FAx FINAL REPORT FOR TESTING OF COMPACTED FILLS FOR BUILDING PAD PARCEL E CAMINO EL DORADO AND OCEAN BLUFF WAY ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: PROTEUS 701 B STREET, SUITE 1200 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 PREPARED BY: CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 CTE Project No. 10 -3487 July 25, 2000 FA10- 341744K_Conpaetion or Building Pad, Pamel E.doc i GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 SITE BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ................ ............................... 1 2.0 TREATMENT OF BUILDING PAD ........................................................ ............................... 1 3.0 FILL PLACEMENT .................................................................................. ............................... 1 4.0 TESTING ................................................................................................... ............................... 2 5.0 FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS ........................... ............................... 3 5.1 Foundations .................................................................................... ............................... 3 5.2 Foundation Setback ........................................................................ ............................... 4 5.3 Concrete Slab -On- Grade ................................................................ ............................... 4 5.4 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures .......................................... ............................... 4 5.5 Exterior Flatwork and Improvements ............................................ ............................... 5 5.6 Temporary Construction Slopes .................................................... ............................... 6 6.0 VEHICULAR PAVEMENTS ................................................................... ............................... 7 6.1 Asphalt Pavement .......................................................................... ............................... 7 6.2 Portland Cement Concrete Pavements ........................................... ............................... 7 7.0 ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION .............................. ............................... 8 8.0 SURFACE AND SUBGRADE DRAINAGE ........................................... ............................... 8 9.0 LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................... ............................... 9 FIGURES FIGURE 1 SITE INDEX MAP FIGURE 2 COMPACTION TEST LOCATION MAP FIGURE 3 BASEMENT AND RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL TABLES TABLE 1 COMPACTION TEST SUMMARY TABLE 2 LABORATORY TEST DATA F\IN3497%pt Compaction of Building Pd. Pamel E.doc Final Report for Testing of Compacted Fills for Building Pad Page 1 Parcel E Camino el Dorado and Ocean Bluff Way, Encinitas, California July 25, 2000 CTE Job No. 10 -3487 1.0 SITE BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The site is located southwest of the intersection of Camino el Dorado and Ocean Bluff Way in the City of Encinitas, California. The residential development has been subdivided into four parcels, these are designated Parcels A, B, D, and E. Single - family residences bound the site development. Figures 1 and 2 are maps showing the location and layout of the site. It is our understanding that the site is to be developed by constructing one -story and two -story wood - frame residential structures and associated improvements (utilities, landscaping, driveway and sidewalk areas). 2.0 TREATMENT OF BUILDING PAD To prepare the building pad, areas receiving fill were overexcavated to minimum depths of two feet below finished pad elevation. These over - excavations generally extended a minimum of five feet laterally beyond the building limits. Exposed subgrades were scarified and moisture conditioned before being recompacted. Based on site preparation, we anticipate the building footings will be founded entirely in Engineered Fill or entirely in Quaternary Terrace Deposit materials. 3.0 FILL PLACEMENT Compacted fill was placed during recent grading to prepare the site for the construction of the proposed development. Fill material was derived from on site sources. Fill was generally placed in FAlD- 1487TRpt Compaction of Building Pad, Parcel E.doc Final Report for Testing of Compacted Fills for Building Pad Page 2 Parcel E Camino el Dorado and Ocean Bluff Way, Encinitas, California July 25, 2000 CTE Job No. 10 -3487 uniform compacted lifts at near optimum moisture content. Grading was performed using standard heavy -duty construction equipment. 4.0 TESTING Testing was generally performed to supplement field observations in promoting compliance with the applicable project requirements. Testing of compacted fill addressed by this report was conducted between December 14, 1998 and June 27, 2000. Field- testing of the compacted fill material was conducted in accordance with ASTM D2922 and D3017 (nuclear method). Results of the field - testing indicate that fill materials were compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D -1557. Tabulated results of the field compaction testing performed are provided in the attached Table I, "Compaction Test Summary". Laboratory determination of the reference compaction values for the fill materials are provided in Table II, "Laboratory Test Results ". Approximate test locations are graphically depicted on Figure 2, "Compaction Test Location Map." F' \10- 1187\Rpt_Compwtion of Building Pad. Paul E.doc Final Report for Testing of Compacted Fills for Building Pad Page 3 Parcel E Camino el Dorado and Ocean Bluff Way, Encinitas, California July 25, 2000 CTE Job No. 10 -3487 5.0 FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Foundations Based on the low to moderate anticipated expansion potential of on -site soils, recommended foundations consist of reinforced footings /slabs -on -grade or post- tension systems. Recommendations for both foundation systems are provided below. Regardless of the foundation system used footings should not straddle cut/fill (changes between cut and fill soils) interfaces. Foundation dimensions and reinforcement should be based on allowable bearing values of 2000 pounds per square foot (psf). The allowable bearing value may be increased by one third for short duration loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces. Footings should be at least 12 inches wide and installed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent subgrade. Minimum reinforcement for continuous footings should consist of two #5 reinforcing bars; one placed near the top and one placed near the bottom. The project structural engineer should design isolated footing reinforcement. The structural engineer should also provide recommendations for reinforcement of any deepened spread footings and footings with pipe penetrations. For post - tension foundation system design the following parameters should be used. • Edge Moisture Variation Distance, em(ft): center lift 5, edge lift 3 • Differential Soil Movement, ym: center lift 1 -inch, edge lift 0.35 inches • Settlement: Total 1 -inch, Differential 'Y2 -inch • Expansion Potential: very low • Subgrade Modulus (k- value) 150 psi /in. • Slab subgrade friction coefficient: 0.35 F: \IO- )4$7\Rp1_Comp&aion of Building Pad, Parcel E.doe Final Report for Testing of Compacted Fills for Building Pad Page 4 Parcel E Camino el Dorado and Ocean Bluff Way, Encinitas, California July 25, 2000 CTE Job No. 10 -3487 5.2 Foundation Setback Footings should be designed such that the minimum horizontal distance from the top of the adjacent slope to the outer edge of the footing is a minimum of 10 feet. 5.3 Concrete Slab -On -Grade Lightly loaded concrete slabs should be a minimum of four inches thick. Minimum slab reinforcement should consist of #3 reinforcing bars placed on 18 -inch centers each way at mid -slab height. In moisture sensitive floor areas, a vapor barrier of ten -mil visqueen overlying a two -inch layer of compacted clean sand, gravel, or crushed rock should be installed. A two -inch layer of clean washed sand should be placed above the visqueen to protect the membrane during concrete placement. 5.4 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures The following recommendations may be used for shallow footings on the site. Foundations placed in firm, well - compacted fill material or competent formation may be designed using a coefficient of friction of 0.35 (total frictional resistance equals coefficient of friction times the dead load). A design passive resistance value of 300 pounds per square foot per foot of depth (with a maximum value of 1,200 pounds per square foot) may be used. The allowable lateral resistance can be taken as the sum of the frictional resistance and the passive resistance, provided the passive resistance does not exceed two - thirds of the total allowable resistance. Retaining walls up to ten feet high and F: \Ia3437%p1 Compaction of Building Pad, Parcel E.doe Final Report for Testing of Compacted Fills for Building Pad Page 5 Parcel E Camino el Dorado and Ocean Bluff Way, Encinitas, California July 25, 2000 CTE Job No. 10 -3487 backfilled using granular soils may be designed using the equivalent fluid weights given in the Table 1 below. WALL TYPE LEVEL BACKFILL SLOPE BACKFILL 2:1 (HORIZONTAL:VERTICAL) CANTILEVER WALL 38 60 (YIELDING) RESTRAINED WALL 58 90 The above values assume non - expansive backfill and free draining conditions. Measures should be taken to prevent a moisture buildup behind all retaining walls. Drainage measures should include free draining backfill materials and perforated drains. Figure 3 provides recommended gravel and perforated pipe drainage system. These drains should discharge to an appropriate offsite location. 5.5 Exterior Flatwork and Improvements Based on the results of expansion index testing we recommend that flatwork be installed with crack - control joints at appropriate spacing as designed by the project architect. Flatwork, which should be installed with crack control joints, includes driveways, sidewalks, and architectural features. To '- mitigate the potential for cracking in flatwork, reinforcing similar to that recommended for interior concrete slabs should be considered. All subgrades should be prepared according to the earthwork F \ lo- )48'Ntpt Cotnp&ction of Building Pad, Parcel E doc Final Report for Testing of Compacted Fills for Building Pad Page 6 Parcel E Camino el Dorado and Ocean Bluff Way, Encinitas, California July 25, 2000 CTE Job No. 10 -3487 recommendations previously given before placing concrete. Positive drainage should be established and maintained adjacent to all flatwork. 5.6 Temporary Construction Slopes Sloping recommendations for unshored temporary excavations are provided. The recommended slopes should be relatively stable against deep- seated failure, but may experience localized sloughing. Onsite soils are considered Type A and B soils with recommended slope ratios as set forth in the Table 2 below. TABLE 2 RECOMMENDED TEMPORARY SLOPE RATIOS SOIL TYPE SLOPE RATIO MAXIMUM HEIGHT (Horizontal: vertical) A (Quaternary Terrace Deposits) '/4 :1 (MAXIMUM) 10 FEET B (Engineered Fill Soils) 1:1 (MAXIMUM) 10 FEET According to Cal -OSHA regulations actual field conditions and soil type designations must be verified by a "competent person ". Additionally, the above sloping recommendations do not allow for surcharge loading at the top of slopes by vehicular traffic, equipment or materials. Appropriate surcharge setbacks must be maintained from the top of all unshored slopes. FA 10- 3497TRpl_Compeetion of BuildinS Pad, Pueel Edoe Final Report for Testing of Compacted Fills for Building Pad Page 7 Parcel E Camino el Dorado and Ocean Bluff Way, Encinitas, California July 25, 2000 CTE Job No. 10 -3487 6.0 VEHICULAR PAVEMENTS In pavement areas underlain by fills, the upper one foot of fills should be compacted to a minimum of 95% of the laboratory determined maximum density. Additionally, fills should be appropriately moisture conditioned. 6.1 Asphalt Pavement Preliminary pavement sections presented below are based on Resistance "R" Value testing of representative formational materials on this site. The asphalt pavement design is based on California Department of Transportation Highway Manual, testing of site soils, and on a traffic index of 4.5. TABLE 3 w ; ' Traffic Area Assumed Traffic Subgrade AC Class II Index " R" Value Thickness Aggregate Base (inches) Thickness (inches) Auto Parking Areas 4.5 43 3.0 4.0 (Option 2) 6.2 Portland Cement Concrete Pavements We understand that parking and drive areas may be paved with concrete pavements. Concrete used for pavement areas should possess a minimum 600 pounds per square inch (psi) modulus of rupture. Pavements should be constructed according to industry standards. F. \10.3487\Rpt_Compaction of Building Pad, Pucel E.doc Final Report for Testing of Compacted Fills for Building Pad Page 8 Parcel E Camino el Dorado and Ocean Bluff Way, Encinitas, California July 25, 2000 CTE Job No. 10 -3487 Traffic Area Subgrade "R" -Value PCC Thickness (inches) Auto Parking Areas 43 5.5 7.0 ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION All additional grading and backfilling should be observed and tested to assure conformance with recommendations presented herein. All footing trenches should be examined before placement of steel reinforcement. All graded slopes should be planted and maintained with erosion resistant vegetation. 8.0 SURFACE AND SUBGRADE DRAINAGE Foundation and concrete - slab -on grade performance depends greatly on how well the runoff waters drain from the site. This is true both during construction and over the entire life of the structure. The ground surface around structures should be graded so that water flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. The surface gradient needed to do this depends on the landscaping type. In general, the pavements and flowerbeds within five feet of buildings should slope away at gradients of at least two percent. Densely vegetated areas should have minimum gradients of five percent away from buildings if doing so is practical. FAl0- 3437\" Compaction of Building Pad, Pvicel E.doc Final Report for Testing of Compacted Fills for Building Pad Page 9 Parcel E Camino el Dorado and Ocean Bluff Way, Encinitas, California July 25, 2000 CTE Job No. 10 -3487 Planters should be constructed so that water from them will not seep into the foundation areas or beneath slabs and pavement. In any event, the site maintenance personnel should be instructed to limit irrigation to the minimum actually necessary to sustain the landscaping plants properly. Should excessive irrigation, waterline breaks, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones and groundwater may develop. Consequently, the site should be graded so that water drains away readily without saturating the foundation or landscaped areas or cascading over slope faces. A potential source of water, such as water pipes, drains, and the like should be frequently examined for signs of leakage or damage. Any such leakage or damage should be repaired promptly. The project Civil Engineers should thoroughly evaluate the on -site drainage and make provisions as necessary to keep surface waters from affecting the site. 9.0 LIMITATIONS As limited by the scope of the services that we agreed to perform, our opinions presented herein are based on our observations, test results, and understanding of the proposed site development. Our service was performed according to the currently accepted standard of practice and in a way that provides a reasonable measure of the compliance of the grading operations with the job requirements. No warranty, express or implied, is given or intended with respect to the performance of the project in any respect. Submittal of this report should not be construed as relieving the grading contractor of his responsibility to comply with the project requirements. FA 0.14371Rpt Compecdon of Building Pd, Parcel E doc Final Report for Testing of Compacted Fills for Building Pad Page 10 Parcel E Camino el Dorado and Ocean Bluff Way, Encinitas, California July 25, 2000 CTE Job No. 10 -3487 The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding testing conducted, observations made during construction or recommendations presented herein, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. � � 6w:u Rodney D. Ballard, GE #2173 Jonathan Goodmacher, RG #6143 Manager, Geotechnical Engineering Senior Geologist O Qp,OFES /pp,, D. co No. 2173 Exp. 6/30 /0f qTF OF FA10- 34g7TRpt_Catnpaction of Building Pad, Parcel E.doc , Fs st IA £ I @� R I E °- ST 2 3� r a YI �� Z" - Mar m aa� - - -_ - -- - -- wr N YIEr a r V C SM LUfJ ■ WY NW - ' LE 5r R � G , vEFAtwr K t, g SITE Ok ENCIMITpS s o g sr"IFFSTA slRn ma ENCINITAS VILLAGE> ST BLV — —t ENCINITAS "� BLVD': D . IA00 15M p E - � E T .a a ACINITAS PLAZA c sT B sr aEST r DR ! ST � � i ,1W NJ YIN 14 �s� g $ g 15 £• ; r"K ISIAWn p Sr St g ,W a- E ST a <r gDER $� sr ` w r !IE RD 120'7 '1 t a r Av >5 -r•- !3 is fa rREISURE Roo JIER Sg ?� - �` p 4 sT �tj M ' tt < n RIAS �G IRA SAN 1 4, n 5 DIf6UITO �_ Y 4� YEaow, rt Fo i 9 Tao Yoo� vE� 9 M OR K suNrtr TE[ NSCR FAI�rN Av I "_ $AI(TA S a 1100 FE ROW .. O Si R INITAS MMEYAA J �, ,r nlAr LIFF M , G1Hf , _ A e Z $ v S •.. rn 1 I C = 3 o 1 4qQ � I tpEAH LL OR W. _ — ,� 1 y aors ae ;� er s m 5Y ... %A , D I F F - + te � . YIMM.OR "o OE 11 .::� EEK CT DR �, Itlm ;Y -THE -SEA ��� w DD Is t \ fARETT W 4 SAMlCASTLE DR <r Y7 > ICR AY ci1PD� MILL EOYW IN ♦ n % ■ S �WY &Fl ,,. g ° EL V' Iwo 1 �� STATf 6EIfN• ENC :SIT - w - 2 US f4 AV � .. ISIS 7600 I GTE $ NI COSTA C ,.. S • 1 TV N T 9 25 0 26 0 1A 1 z 1 m ius - CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. '.� 6PrT TIi,' IINI,':A L:A ND rNS' IRI. r 1 IU ':FT1tIIN1:I[RIN,; ITSIAN,;eAND INSPECTION 0 1120 2640 5?gD FF:rr w, inn ' II I\ INI:YARD :\t I'M l'. ST f: 1; IN ONUl1)t I l )202 795 :\ , rnor Io- -1 r JOB 140 SITE INDEX NIAP 10 -3487 SQUELL" 'f110\IAS BROTHERS MAPS PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEN F'LOPMENI', PARCE1, I.: 7E 1996 SAN DIEGO EDITION CAMINO F.I, DORAW AND O('EAN BLUFF WAY 7/00 � S 1 CAMINO ELDORADO . I O I I I I I I I I I O la 1 I I I 12 Q 1 I 3 i a [PARCEL D] I [PARCEL E] I U I [PARCEL B] [PARCEL A] C) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I [EXISTING RESIDENCE] I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I i I CAMINO DE ORCHIDA LEGEND 1 51 APPROXIMATE LOCATION CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. OF COMPACTION TEST p GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION r — — — C 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, STE G ESCONDQx) CA. 92029 (760) 746 -4955 I I PARCEL LIMITS `- - - - - - 10 COMPACTION TEST LOCATIONS MAP 10 -3487 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, PARCEL E NO SCALE CAMINO EL DORADO A ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 7/00 2 T RETAINING WAL WALL O BACKFILL COMPACTED • . \�� TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY ► p1) 3/4" GRAVEL SURROUNDED s0� � a BY FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 0 140 N, OR EQUIVALENT) a ► p1) > 0 0 0 > ; o ; 1' MIN a o • n .o. 0 a FINISH GRADE o •oo v ° a p ��. 4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC ��� / ��j ��� j • p o ��� PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR > 0 0 0 EQUIVALENT). MINIMUM � �\ • . �� \j 1% GRADIENT TO SUITABLE � j/ ° • /� \�j OUTLET V / N, � � WALL FOOTING MINIMUM 6 LAYER OF � FILTER ROCK UNDERLYING PIPE CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. .� GEOTEC3INICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENCENEERINGTESTQNG AND INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE. STE G ESCONDIDO CA. 42021) C760) 7464955 HNOINpBNINO,INC RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL 10 -3487 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, PARCEL E SCAL N O SCALE CAMINO EL DORADO AND OCEAN BLUFF WAY D AF TROJECTSNIa34rnRETAImDwwAL L.CNV I ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 7/00 3 TABLE COMPACTION TEST SUMMARY 12/14/98 1 PARCEL E 307.5 113.9 14.8 96% 1 12/14/98 2 PARCEL E 307.5 111.9 16.0 94% 1 12/14/98 3 PARCEL E 307.5 113.3 10.5 95% 1 12/14/98 4 PARCEL E 307.5 114.4 12.6 96% 1 12/14/98 5 PARCEL E 307.5 116.9 12.8 98% 1 12/14/98 6 PARCEL E 307.5 108.7 13.5 91% 1 12/15/98 7 PARCEL E 309.0 110.6 11.9 93% 1 12/15/98 8 PARCEL E 309.0 114.3 14.4 96% 1 12/15/98 9 PARCEL E 309.0 114.7 13.6 96% 1 12/15/98 10 PARCEL E 309.0 113.1 15.7 95% 1 6/27/00 11 NE CORNER OF BUILDING PAD FG 107.5 11.2 90% 1 6/27/00 12 WEST SIDE OF BUILDING PAD FG 109.0 11.6 92% 1 6/27/00 13 CENTER OF BUILDING PAD FG 109.7 11.7 92% 1 6/27/00 14 SOUTH OF CENTER OF BUILDING PADI FG 106.9 13.5 90% 1 " TEST FAILED, SEE RETEST l r mo o $ a� CONSTRUCTION STING & ENGINEERING, INC. SAN DIEGO, CA RIVERSIDE, CA VENTURA, CA TRACY, CA LANCASTER, CA G, �+ 2414 Vineyard Ave. 490 E. Princdand Ct. 1645 Pacific Ave. 242 W. Larch Rd. 42156 10th St. W. ok �' Suite G Suite 7 Suite 105 Suite F Unit K G Escondido, CA 92029 Corona, CA 91719 Oxnard, CA 93033 Tracy, CA 95376 Landcaster, CA 93534 ENGINEERING INC. (760) 746 -4955 (909) 371 -1890 (805) 486 -6475 (209) 839 -2890 (805) 726 -9676 (760) 746 -9806 Fax (909) 371 -2168 Fax (805) 486 -9016 Fax (209) 839 -2895 Fax (805) 726 -9676 Fax PROPOSED ENCINITAS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT APN 258- 140 - 01,02,03 CAMINO ELDORADO AND CAMINO DE ORCHIDA ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: PROTEUS 701 B STREET, SUITE 1200 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92121 PREPARED BY: CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 CTE Project No. 10 -2597 February 18, 1999 F: \10- 2597 \Rp[_Compaction of Building Pads.doc GEOTECHNTCAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION -w- TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 SITE BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ................ ............................... 1 2.0 TREATMENT OF BUILDING PAD ........................................................ ............................... 1 3.0 FILL PLACEMENT .................................................................................. ............................... 2 4.0 TESTING ................................................................................................... ............................... 2 5.0 FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS ........................... ............................... 3 5.1 Foundations .................................................................................... ............................... 3 5.2 Foundation Setback ........................................................................ ............................... 4 5.3 Concrete Slab -On- Grade ................................................................ ............................... 4 5.4 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures .......................................... ............................... 4 5.5 Exterior Flatwork and Improvements ............................................ ............................... 5 5.6 Temporary Construction Slopes .................................................... ............................... 6 6.0 Vehicular Pavements ................................................................................. ............................... 6 6.1 Asphalt Pavement .......................................................................... ............................... 7 6.2 Portland Cement Concrete Pavements ........................................... ............................... 7 7.0 ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION .............................. ............................... 8 8.0 SURFACE AND SUBGRADE DRAINAGE ........................................... ............................... 8 9.0 LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................... ............................... 9 FIGURES FIGURE 1 SITE INDEX MAP FIGURE 2 COMPACTION TEST LOCATION MAP FIGURE 3 BASEMENT AND RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL TABLES TABLE 1 COMPACTION TEST SUMMARY TABLE 2 LABORATORY TEST DATA T 7� V Compaction of Building Pad Proposed Encinitas Residential Development Page 1 APN 258 -140- 01,02,03 Encinitas, California February 18, 1999 CTE Job No. 10 -2597 1.0 SITE BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The site consists of three separate lots in the City of Encinitas. The lots are south and west of Camino Eldorado and east of Camino De Orchida. The County of San Diego Assessor's Parcel Numbers for this site are APN 258 -140- 01,02,03. However, these parcels have been subdivided into four parcels. These are designated Parcels A, B, D, and E. The site is bounded generally by single family residences. Before recent grading operations the site generally sloped downward to the west and south. Site elevations ranged from 311 feet above mean sea level (msl) at the northeastern portion of the property to 298 feet msl at the southwestern property area. Figures 1 and 2 are maps showing the location and layout of the site. It is our understanding that the site is to be developed by constructing one -story and two -story wood- frame residential structures and associated improvements (utilities, landscaping, driveway and sidewalk areas). 2.0 TREATMENT OF BUILDING PAD To prepare the building pads, areas receiving fill were overexcavated to minimum depths of two feet below finished pad elevation. These overexcavations generally extended a minimum of five feet laterally beyond the building limits. Exposed subgrades were scarified and moisture conditioned before being recompacted. Based on site preparation, we anticipate building footings, will be founded entirely in Engineered Fill or entirely in Quaternary Terrace Deposit materials. F: \l0- 2597T.Rpt_Compaction of Building Pads.doc T Compaction of Building Pad Proposed Encinitas Residential Development Page 2 APN 258 -140- 01,02,03 Encinitas, California February 18, 1999 CTE Job No. 10 -2597 3.0 FILL PLACEMENT Compacted fill was placed during recent grading to prepare the site for the construction of the proposed development. Fill material was derived from on site sources. Fill was generally placed in uniform compacted lifts at near optimum moisture content. Grading was performed using standard heavy -duty construction equipment. 4.0 TESTING Testing was generally performed to supplement field observations in promoting compliance with the applicable project requirements. Testing of compacted fill addressed by this report was conducted between December 14, 1998 and January 5, 1999. Field testing of the compacted fill material was conducted in accordance with ASTM D2922 and D3017 (nuclear method). Results of the field testing indicate that fill materials were compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D -1557. Tabulated results of the field compaction testing performed are provided in the attached Table I, "Compaction Test Summary". Laboratory determination of the reference compaction values for the fill materials are provided in Table II, "Laboratory Test Results ". Approximate test locations are graphically depicted on Figure 2, "Compaction Test Location Map." FA10- 2597 \Rpt_Compaction of Building Pads.doc s- Compaction of Building Pad Proposed Encinitas Residential Development Page 3 APN 258- 140 - 01,02,03 Encinitas, California February 18, 1999 CTE Job No. 10 -2597 5.0 FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Foundations Based on the low to moderate anticipated expansion potential of on -site soils, recommended foundations consist of reinforced footings /slabs -on -grade or post- tension systems. Recommendations for both foundation systems are provided below. Regardless of the foundation system used footings should not straddle cut/fill (changes between cut and fill soils) interfaces. Foundation dimensions and reinforcement should be based on allowable bearing values of 2000 pounds per square foot (psf). The allowable bearing value may be increased by one third for short duration loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces. Footings should be at least 12 inches wide and installed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent subgrade. Minimum reinforcement for continuous footings should consist of two #5 reinforcing bars; one placed near the top and one placed near the bottom. Isolated footing reinforcement should be designed by the project structural engineer. The structural engineer should also provide recommendations for reinforcement of any deepened spread footings and footings with pipe penetrations. For post- tension foundation system design the following parameters should be used. • Edge Moisture Variation Distance, em(ft): center lift 5, edge lift 3 • Differential Soil Movement, ym: center lift 1 -inch, edge lift 0.35 inches • Settlement: Total 1 -inch, Differential % -inch • Expansion Potential: very low • Subgrade Modulus (k- value) 150 psi /in. • Slab subgrade friction coefficient: 0.35 F: \l0- 2597 \Rpt_Compaction of Building Pads.doc i� Compaction of Building Pad Proposed Encinitas Residential Development Page 4 APN 258 -140- 01,02,03 Encinitas, California February 18, 1999 CTE Job No. 10 -2597 5.2 Foundation Setback Footings should be designed such that the minimum horizontal distance from the top of the adjacent slope to the outer edge of the footing is a minimum of 10 feet. 5.3 Concrete Slab -On -Grade Lightly loaded concrete slabs should be a minimum of four inches thick. Minimum slab reinforcement should consist of #3 reinforcing bars placed on 18 -inch centers each way at mid -slab height. In moisture sensitive floor areas, a vapor barrier of ten mil visqueen overlying a two -inch layer of compacted clean sand, gravel, or crushed rock should be installed. A two inch layer of clean washed sand should be placed above the visqueen to protect the membrane during concrete placement. 5.4 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures The following recommendations may be used for shallow footings on the site. Foundations placed in firm, well - compacted fill material or competent formation may be designed using a coefficient of friction of 0.35 (total frictional resistance equals coefficient of friction times the dead load). A design passive resistance value of 300 pounds per square foot per foot of depth (with a maximum value of 1,200 pounds per square foot) may be used. The allowable lateral resistance can be taken as the sum of the frictional resistance and the passive resistance, provided the passive resistance does not exceed two - thirds of the total allowable resistance. Retaining walls up to ten feet high and backfilled using granular soils may be designed using the equivalent fluid weights given in the table below. F: \10- 2597 \Rpt_Compaction of Building Pads.doc T Compaction of Building Pad Proposed Encinitas Residential Development Page 5 APN 258 -140- 01,02,03 Encinitas, California February 18, 1999 CTE Job No. 10 -2597 TABLE EQUIVALENT FLUID UNIT WEIGHTS (pounds per cubic foot) WALL TYPE LEVEL BACKFILL SLOPE BACKFILL 2:1 (HORIZONTAL:VERTICAL) CANTILEVER WALL 38 60 (YIELDING) RESTRAINED WALL 58 90 The above values assume non - expansive backfill and free draining conditions. Measures should be taken to prevent a moisture buildup behind all retaining walls. Drainage measures should include free draining backfill materials and perforated drains. Figure 3 provides a recommended gravel and perforated pipe drainage system. These drains should discharge to an appropriate offsite location. 5.5 Exterior Flatwork and Improvements Based on the results of expansion index testing we recommend that flatwork be installed with crack - control joints at appropriate spacing as designed by the project architect. Flatwork, which should be installed with crack control joints, includes driveways, sidewalks, and architectural features. To mitigate the potential for cracking in flatwork, reinforcing similar to that recommended for interior concrete slabs should be considered. All subgrades should be prepared according to the earthwork recommendations previously given before placing concrete. Positive drainage should be established and maintained adjacent to all flatwork. F: \10- 2597 \Rpt_Compaction of Building Pads.doc Compaction of Building Pad Proposed Encinitas Residential Development Page 6 APN 258 -140- 01,02,03 Encinitas, California February 18, 1999 CTE Job No. 10 -2597 5.6 Temporary Construction Slopes Sloping recommendations for unshored temporary excavations are provided. The recommended slopes should be relatively stable against deep- seated failure, but may experience localized sloughing. Onsite soils are considered Type A and B soils with recommended slope ratios as set forth in the Table below. TABLE RECOMMENDED TEMPORARY SLOPE RATIOS SOIL TYPE SLOPE RATIO MAXIMUM HEIGHT (Horizontal: vertical) A (Quaternary Terrace Deposits) '/ :1 (MAXIMUM) 10 FEET B (Engineered Fill Soils) 1:1 (MAXIMUM) 10 FEET According to Cal -OSHA regulations actual field conditions and soil type designations must be verified by a "competent person ". Additionally, the above sloping recommendations do not allow for surcharge loading at the top of slopes by vehicular traffic, equipment or materials. Appropriate surcharge setbacks must be maintained from the top of all unshored slopes. 6.0 VEHICULAR PAVEMENTS In pavement areas underlain by fills, the upper one foot of fills should be compacted to a minimum of 95% of the laboratory determined maximum density. Additionally, fills should be appropriately moisture conditioned. F: \10- 2597 \Rpt_Compaction of Building Pads.doc r Compaction of Building Pad Proposed Encinitas Residential Development Page 7 APN 258 -140- 01,02,03 Encinitas, California February 18, 1999 CTE Job No. 10 -2597 6.1 Asphalt Pavement Preliminary pavement sections presented below are based on Resistance "R" Value testing of representative formational materials on this site. The asphalt pavement design is based on California Department of Transportation Highway Manual, testing of site soils, and on a traffic index of 4.5. TABLE ASPHALT PAVEMENT Traffic Area Assumed Traffic Subgrade AC Class II Index "R" Value Thickness Aggregate Base (inches) Thickness (inches) Auto Parking Areas 4.5 43 3.0 4.0 (Option 2) 6.2 Portland Cement Concrete Pavements We understand that parking and drive areas may be paved with concrete pavements. Concrete used for pavement areas should possess a minimum 600 pounds per square inch (psi) modulus of rupture. Pavements should be constructed according to industry standards. TABLE CONCRETE PAVEMENT DESIGN Traffic Area Subgrade "R" -Value PCC Thickness (inches) Auto Parking Areas 43 5.5 RA O- 2597\Rpt_Compaction of Building Pads.doc Compaction of Building Pad Proposed Encinitas Residential Development Page 8 APN 258 -140- 01,02,03 Encinitas, California February 18, 1999 CTE Job No. 10 -2597 7.0 ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION All additional grading and backfilling should be observed and tested to assure conformance with recommendations presented herein. All footing trenches should be examined before placement of steel reinforcement. All graded slopes should be planted and maintained with erosion resistant vegetation. 8.0 SURFACE AND SUBGRADE DRAINAGE Foundation and concrete - slab -on grade performance depends greatly on how well the runoff waters drain from the site. This is true both during construction and over the entire life of the structure. The ground surface around structures should be graded so that water flows rapidly away from the structures without ponding. The surface gradient needed to do this depends on the landscaping type. In general, the pavements and flowerbeds within five feet of buildings should slope away at gradients of at least two percent. Densely vegetated areas should have minimum gradients of five percent away from buildings if doing so is practical. Planters should be constructed so that water from them will not seep into the foundation areas or beneath slabs and pavement. In any event, the site maintenance personnel should be instructed to limit irrigation to the minimum actually necessary to sustain the landscaping plants properly. Should excessive irrigation, waterline breaks, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones and groundwater may develop. Consequently, the site should be graded so that water drains away readily without saturating the foundation or landscaped areas or cascading over slope faces. F:\l0-2597\Rpt_Cornpaction of Building Pads.doc y> Compaction of Building Pad Proposed Encinitas Residential Development Page 9 APN 258- 140 - 01,02,03 Encinitas, California February 18, 1999 CTE Job No. 10 -2597 A potential source of water, such as water pipes, drains, and the like should be frequently examined for signs of leakage or damage. Any such leakage or damage should be repaired promptly. The project Civil Engineers should thoroughly evaluate the on -site drainage and make provisions as necessary to keep surface waters from affecting the site. 9.0 LIMITATIONS As limited by the scope of the services that we agreed to perform, our opinions presented herein are based on our observations, test results, and understanding of the proposed site development. Our service was performed according to the currently accepted standard of practice and in a way that provides a reasonable measure of the compliance of the grading operations with the job requirements. No warranty, express or implied, is given or intended with respect to the performance of the project in any respect. Submittal of this report should not be construed as relieving the grading contractor of his responsibility to comply with the project requirements. The opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding testing conducted, observations made during construction or recommendations presented herein, please do not hesitate to contact this office. F:\ 10- 2597 \Rpt_Compaction of Building Pads.doc r Compaction of Building Pad Proposed Encinitas Residential Development Page 10 APN 258 -140- 01,02,03 Encinitas, California February 18, 1999 CTE Job No. 10 -2597 Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. i Rodney D. Ba lard, GE #2173 J athan Goodmacher, RG Manager, Geotechnical Engin e for Geologist � cc v► U a d� 4 ° g 2173 0 � * GQOa� � Exp.6I30� G STATE h'CN OF CA4� FA I 0-2597\Rpt_Compaction of Building Pads.doc r 16 FS S, St to JEN - - - ST 900 zo EZEF ST 9 u 110K UNI(m ST L --- - - - -- 4 L n �ifom 6w r WV ST CIR 9 9 U vt 2i i n CL DE Z ry � awn 11 — . It WEIk CT WA96L z cm 54N LUIS *V ■ REY hWP RD NEEZE SI TE ENCZN ST loo STA AS 1 IT L 'TA' ' lo ELI" 111A VI ENCINITAS BLVD% 0 ST ST r Ism • N 51 sT DR IP ar xs 14 G ST sl VIEW ST E ST R m m WE RD Im sl is BIAS S H 2 14, 1 Po 3 TW No TEI NI'M AV SANTA FE �,Z . AS SEA M T� CREST o1 IPERHILL OR SY CARD I F F - OE RR I Cl Imm )Y -THE-SEA E w gm 9z LD WlU E am LV aluo CT 23 c 116 lixo \f IDDO SrATE SEA0i ♦ HMT rA S __ a U) ARISAS - no IVY . GTE Aq as= .06 __25 0 1 4 1/2 1 MILES CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. GFOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 0 1320 2640 5280 FEET 2414 ) i'INEYARD AVENL E. STE G ESCONDIDO CA 9_0'91"60) -3955 CTE JOB NO: SITE INDEX MAP 10-2597A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT S( ALL SOURCE THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS 1996 SAN DIEGO EDITION ENCINITAS, CAMINO EL DORADO DATE: IFIGURE. CALIFORNIA 2/99 1 It GRAPHICS I PROJECTS 10 -259 11,DEXMAPCV5 CAMINO ELDORADO I O I I I I I n I s (D S I G O I I II ` 13 I G O O I I 0 GO O G G I I Q I I � I Q [PARCEL D] I [PARCEL E] I Q I [PARCEL B] [PARCEL A] I I I I I I I I I I I 3o G I I I I I [EXISTING RESIDENCE] Go 34 42 46 G a 4s 6 a9 a so 48 I 4o I 43 47 I I 39 I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAMINO DE ORCHIDA LEGEND N so APPROXIMATE LOCATION `' OF COMPACTION TEST k�'� CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. z GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION (-- 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, STE G ESCONDIDO CA. 92029 (760) 746 -4955 PARCEL LIMITS C\GINURI CTE JOB NO �- - - - - - COMPACTION TEST LOCATIONS MAP 10 -2597 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SCALE: CAMINO EL DORADO NO SCALE DATE: fTGL'RE: ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 2/99 2 S RETAINING WALL 0 0 0 WALL BACKFILL COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY ► �pv 0 s ° e _ a e p 3/4" GRAVEL SURROUNDED a - BY FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI e ° ° 140 N, OR EQUIVALENT) • ° o d ► pv ° 6 s ' ° I' MIN D G A - O e D o a . a FINISH GRADE o e P. a v • e O ° 0 0 ° d 4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC o ° p o PIPE ( \� \> 0 0 / EQUIVALENT). MINIMUM a /� \/ I% GRADIENT TO SUITABLE OUTLET _ • _ 4 N \'/ 1 � MINIMUM 6" LAYER OF WALL FOOTING \ / /�� /� FILTER ROCK UNDERLYING PIPE CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. c P GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, STE G E CONDIDO CA. 92029 (760) 7464955 ` E\G[NLERI\G,INC CTE JOB NO: RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL 10 -2597 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SC N O SCALE CAMINO EL DORADO ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA DATE: FIGURE: 2/99 3 T TABLE I COMPACTION TEST SUMMARY Job Name: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Job No. 10 -2597 Job Address: ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA Date: 2/18/99 Date Test Location Elevation Density Moisture Relative Soil No. (See map) Feet pcf Content Compaction Type % Dry % Weight 12/14/98 1 PARCEL E 307.5 113.9 14.8 96% l 12/14/98 2 PARCEL E 307.5 111.9 16.0 94% 1 12/14/98 3 PARCEL E 307.5 113.3 10.5 95% 1 12/14/98 4 PARCEL E 307.5 114.4 12.6 96% 1 12/14/98 5 PARCEL E 307.5 116.9 12.8 98% 1 12/14/98 6 PARCEL E 307.5 108.7 13.5 91% 1 12/15/98 7 PARCEL E 309.0 110.6 11.9 93% 1 12/15/98 8 PARCEL E 309.0 114.3 14.4 96% 1 12/15/98 9 PARCEL E 309.0 114.7 13.6 96% 1 12/15/98 10 PARCEL E 309.0 113.1 15.7 95% 1 12/17/98 11 PARCEL D 310.5 112.6 12.7 95% 1 12/17/98 12 PARCEL D 311.0 112.5 13.4 95% 1 12/17/98 13 PARCEL D 310.0 111.0 14.2 93% 1 12/17/98 14 PARCEL D 310.0 115.8 12.2 97% 1 12/24/98 15 PARCEL D 312.0 117.1 12.7 98% 1 12/24/98 16 PARCEL D 313.0 116.6 13.9 98% 1 12/24/98 17 PARCEL D 312.0 117.5 13.3 99% 1 12/24/98 18 PARCEL D 313.0 112.3 14.4 94% 1 12/24/98 19 PARCEL D 312.0 118.7 13.3 100% 1 12/24/98 20 PARCEL D 313.0 113.1 12.5 95% 1 12/24/98 21 PARCEL D 312.0 112.9 12.0 95% 1 12/24/98 22 PARCEL D 313.0 110.2 9.2 ** 93% 1 12/24/98 23 PARCEL D 312.0 113.5 14.7 95% 1 12/24/98 24 PARCEL D 313.0 111.8 15.6 94% 1 12/24/98 25 RETEST OF 22 313.0 110.3 12.6 93% 1 12/29/98 26 PARCEL B -1.5 113.9 13.2 96% 1 12/29/98 27 PARCEL B -1.5 110.3 16.2 93% 1 12/29/98 28 PARCEL B -1.5 108.7 17.8 91% 1 12/29/98 29 PARCEL B -1.5 111.0 12.6 93% 1 12/29/98 30 PARCEL B -1.5 110.4 13.0 93% 1 12/29/98 31 PARCEL B -1.5 109.8 15.0 92% 1 12/29/98 32 PARCEL B -1.5 108.4 13.6 91% 1 12/29/98 33 PARCEL A -1.5 106.7 14.4 90% 1 12/29/98 34 PARCEL A -1.5 109.5 12.0 92% 1 12/29/98 35 PARCEL A -1.5 107.2 12.0 90% 1 12/29/98 36 PARCEL A -1.5 110.5 12.0 93% 1 12/29/98 37 PARCEL A -1.5 115.3 14.0 97% 1 12/30/98 38 PARCEL B FG 108.7 12.0 91% 1 12/30/98 39 PARCEL B FG 105.5 13.1 89 % ** 1 12/30/98 40 PARCEL B FG 112.4 12.4 94% 1 12/30/98 41 PARCEL B FG 113.6 14.5 95% 1 12/30/98 42 PARCEL A FG 105.7 14.6 89 % ** 1 12/30/98 43 PARCEL A FG 106.0 12.0 89 % ** 1 ** TEST FAILED, SEE RETEST 1 TABLE COMPACTION TEST SUMMARY Job Name: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Job No. 10 -2597 Job Address: ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA Date: 2/18/99 Date Test Location Elevation Density Moisture Relative Soil No. (See map) Feet pcf Content Compaction Type % Dry % Weight 1/4/99 44 RETEST OF 39 FG 114.9 14.4 98% 2 1/4/99 45 PARCEL B FG 111.5 12.6 95% 2 1/4/99 46 RETEST OF 42 FG 108.0 14.3 92% 2 1/4/99 47 RETEST OF 43 FG 107.2 12.0 92% 2 1/4/99 48 PARCEL A FG 105.6 12.0 90% 2 1/4/99 49 PARCEL A FG 109.4 14.2 94% 2 1/4/99 50 PARCEL A FG 108.8 13.8 93% 2 ** TEST FAILED, SEE RETEST 2 TABLE II LABORATORY TEST DATA Job Name: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Job No. 10 -2597 Job Address: ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA Date 2/18/99 Maximum Optimum Sample No. Dry Density Moisture Soil pcf Content Description % 1 119.0 12.0 Tan silty SAND 2 117.0 8.5 Light orangish brown silty SAND 1