1990-23
8
8
8
RESOLUTION NO. OE90-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE OLD ENCINITAS
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW
PERMIT TO ALLOW AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING DUPLEX
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 769 NARDO ROAD
(CASE NUMBER 90-174 DR)
WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Design Review permit
was filed by Mr. Harold Fuson to allow an addition to an existing
duplex, per Chapters 30.16 and 23.08 of the City of Encinitas
Municipal Code, for the property located at 769 Nardo, legally
described as:
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 6161, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County, July 14, 1977 as File
No. 77-282290 of Official Records.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application on
October 11, 1990, and;
WHEREAS, the Community Advisory Board considered:
1. The staff report dated October 2, 1990;
2. The application, site plan and elevations submitted by
the applicant;
3. Oral evidence submitted at the hearing;
4. written evidence submitted at the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Old Encinitas Community Advisory Board made the
following findings pursuant to Chapters 30.16 and 23.08 of the
Encinitas Municipal Code:
(SEE ATTACHMENT "A")
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Old Encinitas Community
Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that application 90-174 DR
is hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
(SEE ATTACHMENT "B")
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Old Encinitas Community Advisory
Board of the City of Encinitas that:
This proj ect was found to be exempt from environmental review
under Section 15301 (e) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of October,
following vote, to wit:
1990, by the
AYES: Birnbaum, Rotsheck, Steyaert
8
8
8
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Tobias
ABSTAIN: None
MTEST: . ~
~ c-:? '- ""-
Tom Curriden
Associate Planner
œ: ~~--
Peter Tobi s, Chairman of
the Old Encinitas Community
Advisory Board
ATTACHMENT "A"
8
Resolution No. OE90-23
Case No. 90-174 DR
The following findings must be made by the authorized
agency to warrant approval of the design review permit
in accordance with Section 23.08.072 of the Municipal
Code:
A. The project design is consistent with the General
Plan, a Specific Plan, or the provisions of this code.
Evidence: This proposal is in conformance with the
Municipal Code and the General Plan. No Specific Plan
is applicable.
B. The design is substantially consistent with the
Design Review Guidelines.
8
Evidence: The guidelines applicable to site design are
guidelines 1.1 through 1.3 in section I of the Design
Review Guidelines. with regard to these guidelines, the
Board determined that the proposed addi tion is
substantially consistent. Guidelines 1.1 through 1. 3
encourage the preservation of natural vegetation, slopes
and other significant elements unique to the site. This
project preserves much of the vegetation on the site and
there are no slopes or other significant natural elements
on the site.
The guidelines applicable to building design are
guidelines 2.3 through 2.7 and 2.11 in Section II of the
Design Review Guidelines. section III, Landscape Design
is also applicable. with regard to these guidelines, the
Board determined that the proposed residential addition
is also substantially consistent. Guidelines 2.3 and 2.4
encourage consistency in style and exterior materials
used. This project continues the existing architectural
style, colors and materials with the addition. The
proposal includes a beige-colored stucco exterior siding
and brown composition shingle roofing to match the
existing structure.
8
Guideline 2.5 encourages buildings to reflect their
intended use and be designed at a residential scale and
proportion. Guidelines 2.6, 2.7 and 2.11 encourage roof
structures to be architecturally integrated into the
building design. The plans indicate that the addition
roof has been designed with a 6 in 12 pitch to match the
existing roof. Finally, the Board determined that the
landscape plan is substantially consistent with the
Design Review Guidelines which encourage drought
8
tolerant, mature landscaping.
C. The project would not adversely affect the health,
safety, or general welfare of the community.
Evidence: The Board determined that the addition is
minor in nature and no negative effects on the health,
safety, or general welfare of the community have been
identified.
D. The proj ect would tend to cause the surrounding
neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or
value.
Evidence: The Board determined that no negative impacts
on the surrounding neighborhood can be identified in
conjunction with this project.
8
8
8
8
8
Applicant:
Case No:
Subject:
Location:
I.
STANDARD CONDITIONS
ATTACHMENT "B"
Harold Fuson
90-174 DR
Design Review for addition to existing legal non
conforming duplex.
769 Nardo
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1.
E.
F.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
A.
This approval will expire in two years, on October
11, 1992, at 5:00 p.m. unless the conditions have
been met or an extension has been approved by the
Authorized Agency.
B.
This approval may be appealed to the authorized
agency within 15 calendar days from the date of this
approval.
C.
Approval of this request shall not waive compliance
wi th any sections of the Zoning Development Code and
all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at
the time of Building Permit issuance unless
specifically waived here.
D.
The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted
Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code,
Uniform Fire Code, and all other applicable codes
and ordinances in effect at the time of building
permit issuance unless specifically waived here.
Permits from other agencies will be required as
follows:
a.
Coastal Commission
Project is approved ?s evidenced by the plot plan
dated July 16, 1990 received by the City of
Encinitas on July 16, 1990 and signed by a City
Official as approved by the Old Encinitas Community
MN/jm/MS15-1798wp5 (10-4-90)
CASE NUMBER: 90-174 DR
Page 1 of 3
8
8
8
Advisory Board on October 11, 1990 and shall not be
altered without Planning and Community Development
Department review and approval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
2.
SITE DEVELOPMENT
A.
site shall be developed in accordance with the
approved site plans which are dated and signed as
approved on October 11, 1990 by Community Advisory
Board and which are on file in the Planning and
Community Development Department and the conditions
contained herein.
B.
For new residential development, the applicant shall
pay development fees at the established rate. Such
fees may include, but not be limited to: Permit and
Plan Checking Fees, School Fees, Water and Sewer
Service Fees, Traffic Fees, Drainage Fees, and Park
Fees. Arrangements to pay these fees shall be paid
prior to:
a.
Building permit issuance.
as deemed necessary by the appropriate agency.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
3.
FIRE
A.
Numbers shall be clearly visible from the street
fronting the structure. Where structures are
located off a roadway on long driveways, a monument
shall be placed at the entrance where the driveway
intersects the main roadway. Address numbers shall
be displayed on this monument.
B.
Prior to final recordation, the applicant shall
submit a letter from the Fire District stating that
all development impact, plan check and/or cost
recovery fees have been paid or secured to the
satisfaction of the District.
MN/jm/MS15-1798wp5 (10-4-90)
CASE NUMBER: 90-174 DR
Page 2 of 3
8
8
8
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
4.
PUBLIC WORKS
Grading Conditions
A.
None.
Drainaqe Conditions
A.
Concentrated flows across driveways and/or sidewalks
shall not be permitted.
street Conditions
A.
B.
Map
A.
A.
An Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (I. O. D. ) shall be
made, if applicable, along Nardo adjacent to the property
for road purposes. Nardo is classified as a local street
requiring 60 feet of right-of-way or 30 feet from
centerline.
B.
Developer shall execute and record a covenant with the
County Recorder agreeing not to oppose the formation of
an assessment district to fund the installation of right-
of-way improvements.
utilities
The developer shall comply with all the rules,
regulations and design requirements of the respective
utility agencies regarding services to the project.
The developer shall be responsible for coordination with
S.D.G. & E., Pacific Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
None.
MN/jm/MS15-1798wp5 (10-4-90)
CASE NUMBER: 90-174 DR
Page 3 of 3