Loading...
1989-22 RESOLUTION NO. OE89-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE OLD ENCINITAS COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD CITY OF ENCINITAS, APPROVING A MINOR USE PERMIT, BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT AND ASSOCIATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO ALLOW ANNEXATION OF A .8 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND TO AN EXISTING SELF STORAGE FACILITY LOCATED AT 911 ENCINITAS BOULEVARD THROUGH A BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT FOR USE FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE OF BOATS, RVS. (CASE NUMBER 89-154 MIN/BA/EIA) WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Minor Use Permit and Boundary Adjustment was filed by Encinitas Self Storage to allow annexation of a .8 acre parcel of land to an existing self storage facility as per Chapters 30.74 and 24.70 of the City of Encinitas Municipal Code, for the property located at 911 Encinitas Blvd., legally described as; See Attachment "c" WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application on October 12, 1989, and WHEREAS, the Community Advisory Board considered: 1. The staff report dated October 3, 1989; 2. The application and maps submitted by the applicant; 3. Oral evidence submitted at the hearing; 4. written evidence submitted at the hearing; and TC/05/CAB17-1515WP58(10-16-89-3) WHEREAS, the Old Encinitas Community Advis ry Board made the following findings pursuant to Chapters 24.70 and 30.74 of the Encinitas Municipal Code: SEE ATTACHMENT "A" NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Old E cinitas Community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that Mi or Use Permit and Boundary Adjustment 89-154 MIN/BA/EIA is hereb approved subject to the following conditions: SEE ATTACHMENT "B" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Old Encinitas ommunity Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that: This project will not have a significa t effect on the environment and a negative declaration is hereby certified, pursuant to the California Environmental Q ality Act (CEQA). PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of Octo er, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Tobias, Rotsheck, Steyaert, Birn aum NAYS: None ABSENT: Kauflin ABSTAIN: None if) ð:w Peter Tobia of the Old Community A ATTEST: -------- .---- " ~./// "/ :'~hra-eÎ1 ~-~- ~- Associate Planner TC/05/CAB17-1515WP59(10-16-89-3) ATTACHMENT "A" RESOLUTION NO. OE89- 22 Findings for a Use Permit (Chapter 30.74): 1. The location, size, design or operating characteristics of the proposed project will be incompatible with or will adversely affect or will be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residences, buildings, structures or natural resources, with consideration given to, but not limited to: (a) The inadequacy of public facilities, utilities to serve the proposed project; services and (b) The unsuitability of the site for the type and intensity of use or development which is proposed; and (c) The harmful effect, if any, upon environmental quality and natural resources of the City; or Evidence to Consider: The site will be separated from adjacent uses by natural barriers and/or landscape screening. The property is separated from residential areas to the south and west by the steep natural embankment. Encinitas Boulevard and the existing complex will effectively separate the storage area from residential areas to the north. The outdoor storage area will be partially visible from the east, but the applicant is proposing Eucalyptus trees to help screen that frontage. All public services and facilities are in place to serve the project. The Encinitas Fire Protection District has required the "hammerhead" turnaround area shown on the site plan to provide service. Given the fact that the proposed storage area is adjacent to an existing self-storage facility and topographically separated from adjoining residential areas, it is well suited to the proposed use as opposed to a lower density residential use commensurate with the zone. All setbacks and other zoning regulations will be complied with. Traffic generation will be minimal, at only approximately five average daily trips. As was noted earlier, staff and the assigned environmental consultant have found that the proj ect will have no significant adverse environmental impacts and are thus recommending a Negative Declaration. This recommendation is predicated upon no encroachment into natural slope areas of a 25% gradient or more. The applicant has agreed to meet this condition (see TC/05/CAB17-1515WP510(10-16-89-3) condition #IB) and understands that the most southwesterly space will be downsized or removed accordingly. The area is to be graded be staked prior to grading and inspected to assure compliance. 2. The impacts of the proposed project will adversely affect the policies of the Encinitas General Plan or the provisions of this Code; and Evidence to Consider: The proposed project will not adversely affect the Encinitas General Plan as the specific use is permitted in a residential zone with a Minor Use Permit, which requires findings of suitability of the site for the proposed use and compatibility with adjoining uses. 3. The project fails to comply with any other regulations, conditions or policies imposed by this code. Evidence to Consider: The proposed project complies with and will adhere to all other applicable City codes as represented by the site plan dated June 5,1989 and landscape plan dated June 15, 1989 in conjunction with the conditions of approval attached. The application to adjust a lot line shall be approved unless the parcels resulting from the adjustment will: A. Create a condition which does not comply with zoning and development regulations. All parcels resulting from a lot line adjustment shall comply with minimum City requirements for lot size, dimensions, access, parking and circulation, and all other applicable development standards established through the zoning and development code. The lot line adjustment shall also be found to promote available design standards and guidelines as established through the zoning and development code. The lots resulting from a lot line adjustment and existing and/or potential development on those lots shall be found to be within limitations for lot density and intensity of development and use as established through the zoning and development code. (Ord. 88-10). Evidence to Consider: Both the subject property and the lots being reduced in area through the adjustment conform with all code requirements as to minimum lot size, density (mid-range), subdivision design standards, setbacks and all other technical development standards. TC/05/CAB17-1515WP511(10-16-89-3) B. Create a condition which regulations. comply with building does not Evidence to Consider: No new building is proposed nor condition violating the U.B.C. created. c. Materially, adversely affect an agreement for the security for the construction of public improvements. Evidence to consider: No security agreements for public improvements are in place to be affected by the development as public improvements have already been installed. D. Extends beyond the City limit boundary. Evidence to Consider: The project is entirely within City boundaries. E. Requires substantial alteration of any existing improvement or creates a need for any new improvement. Evidence to Consider: Public improvements along Encinitas Boulevard are in place, and no need of new improvements will be created. F. Adjusts the boundary line between lots which are subject to an agreement for public improvements, unless the City Engineer finds that the proposed adjustment will not materially affect such agreement for the security therefor. Evidence to Consider: See finding "C". TCj05jCAB17-1515WP512(10-16-89-3) Applicant: Case No: Subject: Location: I. STANDARD CONDITIONS ATTACHMENT "B" Encinitas Self storage 89-154 MIN/BA/EIA Boundary Adjustment and Minor Use Permit for outdoor storage of boats, RVs. 911 Encinitas Boulevard SPECIFIC CONDITIONS A. The applicant shall execute and record a Record of Survey Map in accordance with section 24.70.110 of the Zoning Ordinance in accordance with this approval satisfactory to the Community Development Department. B. No grading shall occur to natural slopes of 25% or more. The parking/storage area shall be staked prior to grading and inspected by the Community Development Department to assure compliance. C. The proposed chain link fencing around the perimeter of the parking shall be not more than 1 ft. from said parking/storage area, with project landscaping located outside of said fence. D. A revised landscape plan to include the following shall be submitted and found satisfactory by the Communi ty Development Department pr ior to permit issuance: i. Substitution of a native groundcover for the proposed "Red Apple" Artemia. ii. Incorporation of a native species shrub as an understory to the trees around the perimeter of the parking/storage area. E. Light standards shall be limited to two standards of a maximum 12 ft. height and shall be of a low pressure sodium type. CASE NUMBER: 89-154 MIN/BA/EIA Page 1 of 5 TC/05/CAB17-1515WP51(10-16-89-3) II. STANDARD CONDITIONS 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS A. This approval will expire in two years, on October 12, 1991, at 5:00 p.m. unless the conditions have been met or an extension has been approved by the Authorized Agency. B. This approval may be appealed to the authorized agency wi thin 15 calendar days from the date of this approval. C. At all times during the effective period of this permit, the applicant shall obtain and maintain in valid force and effect, each and every license and permit required by a governmental agency for the operation of the authorized activity. D. In the event that any of the conditions of this permit are not satisfied, the Planning and Community Development Department shall cause a noticed hearing to be set before the authorized agency to determine why the city of Encinitas should not revoke this permit. E. Upon a showing of compelling public necessity demonstrated at a noticed hearing, the City of Encini tas, acting through the authorized agency, may add, amend, or delete conditions and regulations contained in this permit. F. Nothing in this permit shall relieve the applicant from complying with the conditions and regulations generally imposed upon activities similar in nature to the activity authorized by this permit. G. Nothing in this permit shall authorize the applicant to intensify the authorized activity beyond that which is specifically described in this permit. H. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance wi th any sections of the Zoning Development Code and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance unless specifically waived here. CASE NUMBER: 89-154 MIN/BA/EIA Page 2 of 5 TC/05/CAB17-1515WP52(10-16-89-3) I. permi ts from other agencies will be required as follows: a. Coastal Commission APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 2. SITE DEVELOPMENT J. K. 3. LANDSCAPING L. M. For a new commercial or industrial development, or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, School Fees, Traffic Fees, Drainage Fees and Park Fees. These fees shall be paid prior to permit issuance. Any change to the natural drainage or concentration of drainage shall be adequately handled and shall not impact adjacent properties. The landscape plan shall meet the standards of the Zoning ordinance, Grading ordinance, Landscape Guidelines and Offstreet Parking Design Manual and is approved as submitted subject to the following modifications: a. All trees indicated shall be a minimum 15 gallon size and all shrubs shall be a minimum five gallon size. All required plantings shall be in place prior to use. All required plantings shall be maintained in good growing conditions, and whenever necessary, shall be replaced with new plant materials to ensure continued compliance with applicable landscaping, buffering, and screening requirements. All landscaping shall be maintained in a manner that will not depreciate adjacent property values and otherwise adversely affect adjacent properties. TC/05/CAB17-1515WP53(10-16-89-3) CASE NUMBER: 89-154 MIN/BA/EIA Page 3 of 5 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENCINITAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 4. FIRE N. The applicant shall incorporate the Fire Department "hammerhead" turnaround as indicated on the site plan dated June 5, 1989. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 5. GRADING o. The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. CASE NUMBER: 89-154 MIN/BA/EIA Page 4 of 5 TC/05/CAB17-1515WP54(10-16-89-3) ATTACHMENT "C" LEGAL DESCRIPTION BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT All that portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of section 15, Township 13 South, Range 4 West, S.B.M., in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to united States Government Survey approved April 19, 1881, more particularly described as follows: PARCEL A: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of section 15; thence N89039'52"W along the South line thereof, 430.00 feet; thence NOOo50'14"E parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 760.51 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuin~ northerly along said line NOOo50' 14 "E 253.00 feet; thence S89 39' 52"E 320.00 feet, thence SOOo50'14"W 70.00 feet; thence S89039'52"E 15.00 feet; thence SOOo50'14"W 183.00 feet more or less to the southerly line of that parcel of land described in the deed to Marvin W. Kleinschmidt and Lois T. Kleinschmit, husband and wife, recorded September 12, 1952 as Document No. 113679 in Book 4590 Page 253 of Official Records; thence proceeding westerly along said southerly line N89039'52"W 335.00 feet more or less to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of section 15: thence N89039'52"W along the South line thereof, 430.00 feet; thence NOOo50'14"E parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 1013.51 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing northerly along said line NOOo50' 14"E 108.00 feet, more or less to the northwesterly corner of that parcel of land described in deed to Gerald Louis Zinneger and Jo-Ann L. Zinneger, husband and wife, record October 28, 1959 as Document No. 223301 in Book 7961 Page 438 of Official Records; thence proceeding easterly along the northerly line of said parcel of land S89039'52"E 320.00 feet; thence SOOo51'08I1W, 108.00 feet more or less to the Southerly line of said Zinneger parcel; thence proceeding westerly along said southerly line N89039'52"W, 320.00 feet more or less to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CASE NUMBER: 89-154 MINjBAjEIA Page 5 of 5 TCj05jCAB17-1515WP55(10-16-89-3) PARCEL C: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of section 15; thence N89039'52"W along the South line thereof, 430.00 feet; thence NOOo50'14"E parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 760.51 feet; thence N89039'52"W 430.00 feet to the southeasterly corner of that parcel of land described in deed to Marvin W. Kleinschmidt and Lois T. Kleinschmidt, husband and wife, recorded September 12, 1952 as Document No. 113679 in Book 4590 Page 253 of Official Records, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence NOOo50' 14"E (Record NOOo51' 08"E) along the easterly line of said parcel of land a distance of 253.00 feet more or less to the northeast corner of said parcel of land; thence N89039' 52"W (N88o49' 37"W per deed recorded October 28, 1959 in Book 7961 Page 439 O.R.) a distance of 22.00 feet; thence NOOo50'14"E along the easterly line of said parcel of land described in deed recorded October 28, 1959 in Book 7961 Page 439 O.R. a distance of 108.00 feet more or less to the northeast corner of said parcel of land; thence N89039'52"W 88.00 feet; thence SOOo50'14"W 178.00 feet; thence S89039'52"E 15.00 feet; thence SOOo50'14"W 183.00 feet more or less to the southerly line of said parcel of land described in deed recorded September 12, 1952 as Document No. 113679 of Official Records; thence easterly along said southerly line S89039'52"E 95.00 feet more or less to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CASE NUMBER: 89-154 MIN/BA/EIA Page 6 of 5 TC/05/CAB17-1515WP56(10-16-89-3)