1990-08-21
"-
.. ,
8¡
,¡
.
8
MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF ENCINITAS SANITARY DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AUGUST 21, 1990, 4:00 P.M., 535 ENCINITAS
BOULEVARD, SUITE 100
1.
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Board President Gaines called the meeting to order at 5:16 P.M.
Present:
President Gaines,
Slater. '
Shea,
Board Members Hano,
Omsted,
Also
Present:
District Manager Shafer, Board Clerk Pool, District
Engineer August, Management Analyst Schillinger, Senior
Office Specialist Greene.
There being a quorum present, the meeting was in order.
2.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (15 MINUTES)
None.
4.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Board Member Omsted asked that the record reflect she had listened
to the tapes of the two meetings she had missed, had reviewed all
the documents and felt able to comment on the issues for
discussion.
A.
Consideration of Rebuttal Statement to Ballot Issue.
District Manager Shafer reported that at the last meeting the Board
approved the ballot argument against the citizens' initiative
regarding lease of district property to the City for park use, and
Staff was directed to agendize this issue for a special meeting to
determine if the Board wanted to consider filing an argument
against a rebuttal to the argument for the initiative.
Dan Shelley, representing the San Dieguito Heritage Museum, told
the Board the Museum was not taki~g a position on the issue and
said they wanted to leave it up to the voters.
Betsy Schreiber told the Board she felt the draft rebuttal was not
worded strongly enough. She suggested some wording which she
thought would be much stronger.
Omsted moved, Slater seconded to file a rebuttal.
Ayes: Hano, Omsted, Slater, Shea; Nays: Gaines.
Motion carried.
ESD Mins. 08/21/90
Mtg. #90-10, Bk #1, Page íJ?
Page 1
Ii
j
,
:
j
.
.
ESD Mins. 08/21/90
Slater moved, Gaines seconded to continue this item to 8-22-90, at
5:00 P.M. Motion carried. Ayes: Gaines, Hano, Omsted, Slater,
Shea; Nays: None.
B.
Discussion
Initiative.
Ballot
of
Informational
Packet
Concerninq
District Manager Shafer told the Board the reason for producing an
informational packet would be to provide more information to the
citizens than the ballot arguments provided.
In addition, it was brought out that Staff, by law, could not
prepare an informational packet. The consultant for the last City
initiative had cost $44,000.
He said it would cost approximately $4,500 to produce 6,000 mailers
and that the expenditure was not currently part of the 1990/91
financial plan and would haye to be taken out of reserves.
Slater moved, Gaines seconded not to prepare an informational
packet. Motion failed. Ayes: Gaines, Slater; Nays: Hano, Omsted,
Shea.
Omsted moved, Shea seconded to give direction to staff for research
to get an idea of all the parameters involved regarding the options
needed to meet the obligations as far as informational packets are
concerned, and to provide information from a political consultant,
to be presented at the next ESD meeting. Motion carried. Ayes:
Hano, Omsted, Shea. Nays: Gaines, Slater.
5.
ADJOURNMENT
Board President Gaines adjourned the meeting at 6:04 P.M. to August
22, 1990, at 5:00 P.M.
E. ane 001, Board Clerk
By: Ka hy Greene
Senior Office Specialist
ESD Mins. 08/21/90
Mtg. #90-10, Bk #1, page1Ý,:
Page 2