Loading...
1990-42 RESOLUTION NO. C-90-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD DENYING A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 30.16.010A 10 AND SECTIONS 30.16.010B 7D AND 30.16.010E 6; AND SECTION 30.16.010A 11 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2413 SAN ELIJO AVENUE (CASE NO: 90-181V/MOD) WHEREAS, Barry Marassi and Resor Architects applied for a Variance modification in accordance with Chapter 30.78 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow the following: (1) A 7 ft. 8 in. encroachment (was 5 ft. 8 in.) into the 20 foot rear yard setback for a garage (Section 30.16.010A 10). (2) Permit chimney in side yard to exceed 6 foot vertical height limitation and exceed 30 inch maximum width (Section 30.16.010B7D and 30.16.010E6). (3) Exceed 40% lot coverage limitation by 72 square feet (Section 30.16.010A11). WHEREAS, the property is located at 2413 San Elijo Avenue and legally described as follows: Lots 47 and 48 in Block 6, of Tract No. 1369, being a Subdivision of a portion of Cardiff, according to Map thereof No. 1369, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, January 15, 1912. WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application on December 10, 1990 by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were heard; and, CO/04/CR08-694wp5 (12-12-90/2) Page 1 of 4 WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include without limitation: a. site plan, floor plans and elevations submitted by the applicant and dated received by the City on November 7, 1990; b. written information submitted with the application; c. Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made a part of the record at said public hearing; d. Community Advisory Board staff report dated December 5, 1990, which is incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein; and e. Additional written documentation. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas made the following findings for project denial: Variance findinas pursuant to section 30.78.030 of the citv of Encinitas Zoning Ordinance. A. A Variance from the terms of the Zoning Ordinances shall be granted only when, because of the special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. Evidence: The Cardiff Community Advisory Board finds that the variance modification to permit an additional 2 foot extension toward the year yard property line is found to be a special privilege for this property not enjoyed by other property in the vicinity since the amount of square footage of the garage within the rear yard setback is proposed to be increased from 44 sq. ft. (approved by the original variance) to 64 sq. ft. by the modification and the increase will exceed the lot coverage standard which other property owners must comply with for similar development proposals. CO/04/CROS-694wp5 (12-12-90/2) Page 2 of 4 B. Any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated. Evidence: The board finds that the 6 ft. 6 in. wide chimney cap on the northerly chimney is a grant of special privilege due to the property's location at the extreme west end of the residential development in "Old" Cardiff. Properties to the east will have ocean view affected by the chimney cap since it runs parallel (north/south) to the ocean. In addition, the vertical extension above the permitted six feet for the chimney projecting 2 ft. into the southerly side yard setback poses a view impact to property to the east. No conditions of approval could assure that the variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege since the modification proposes to exceed the lot coverage standard and enlarge the nonconforming aspects of the existing garage. C. A variance will not be granted for a parcel of property which authorizes a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zoning regulation governing the parcel of property. Evidence: Single family residences are permitted in the R-11 zoning District. D. No variance shall be granted if the inability to enjoy the privilege enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification: 1. Could be avoided by an alternate development plan; which would be of less significant impact to the site and adjacent properties than the project requiring a variance; 2. Is self-induced as a result of an action taken by the property owner or the owner's predecessor; 3. Would allow such a degree of variation as to consti tute a rezoning or other amendment to the Zoning Code; or 4. Would authorize or legalize the maintenance of any private or public nuisance. CO/04/CR08-694wp5 (12-12-90/2) Page 3 of 4 Evidence: The board finds that the degree of variation which proposes to exceed lot coverage provisions and to extend beyond side yard vertical height standards, chimney width standards, and the increased square footage encroachment into the rear yard setback, can easily be avoided by adhering to the previously approved variance plan (see Resolution C-90-31) to which this application seeks modification. The applicant has already demonstrated that the previously approved plan has less significant impact to the site and adjacent properties than the plan requiring the var iance modification and that the previously approved plan is a feasible alternate to the plan requiring the variance modification. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board that Variance Modification Application No. 90- 181VjMOD is hereby denied. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 1990 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: McCabe, Grossman, Tom NAYS: None ABSENT: MacManus, Cruz ABSTAIN: None ~ ATTEST: ~~ Cral.g R. Olson Assistant Planner CO/04/CR08-694wp5 (12-12-90/2) Page 4 of 4