Loading...
1989-14 RESOLUTION NO. C-89-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A VARIANCE SECTION 30.16.010 A 7 AND 10 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1324 BELLEVIEW AVENUE (CASE NO. 89-083 V) FROM WHEREAS, Robert Haro, applied for a Variance in accordance with Chapter 30.78 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow the following encroachments into setbacks as specified by the Residential 3 Zoning District: (a) A 12.5-foot encroachment into the front yard (Belleview Avenue) setback of 25 feet; and (b) An 8-foot encroachment for deck area into the rear yard setback of 40 feet. WHEREAS, the property is located at 1324 Belleview Avenue and legally described as follows: All of Lots 3, 4, 9 and 10 in Block 1 of the Resubdivision of M.L. Durland's addition, in the city of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 3491, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, August 22, 1956. Excepting from said Lots 9 and 10, the Westerly 89.00 feet thereof. Also excepting from said Lots 3 and 10, the Northerly 25.00 feet thereof. WHEREAS, public hearings were conducted on the application on May 22 and June 12, 1989, by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were heard; and CO/O4/CRO6-306WP5 (6-22-89-1 WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include without limitation: a. b. c. d. e. site plan and building renderings submitted by the applicant; written information submitted with the application; Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made a part of the record at said public hearing; Community Advisory Board staff reports dated May 17 and June 7, 1989, which are incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein; and Additional written documentation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following findings are made by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas: 1. The applicant's property is physically special and unique in contrast with other lots in the same vicinity, for the following reasons: a. The strict application of the setback requirements would place approximately half of the length of the lot into setback area (i.e., 65 ft. of 124 ft.). In addition, due to the existing structure's configuration and required rear yard setback of 40 feet, constructing a garage in the rear yard is impractical. b. The rear yard variance is justified to enhance the property's view due to surrounding development constraints. The radius design of the southerly wall is to preserve the adjoining property's view to the northwest. 2. The proposed remodel is for a single family residence which is permitted within the R-3 zoning District. Therefore, the Variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege, nor authorize an incompatible use within the Zoning District. 3. The Board finds that an alternative development plan is not viable due to the inability to locate the garage to the rear of the existing structure and the R-3 Zoning District is limited to single family residential use and, therefore, granting the variance will not authorize a use or activity not permitted within the district. CO/O4/CRO6-306WP5 (6-22-89-1 4. The Board finds that a redesign is not feasible due to the small lot size when compared to the restrictive setbacks; and the encroachments are necessary to create a two-car garage structure and enjoy views comparable to neighboring properties. The variance is not required due to a self induced action, nor would it constitute a rezoning or private/public nuisance. BE IT ALSO RESOLVED THAT the application for Variance 89-083 V is hereby APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: (1) (2) (3) (4) Plans submitted for building plancheck shall conform to the Variance request for yard setbacks as approved by the Community Advisory Board. The building height shall be limited to Zoning Code requirements and a separate Design Review Application must be submitted if required by the Design Review Ordinance provisions. Developer shall execute and record a covenant with the County Recorder agreeing not to oppose the formation of an assessment district to fund the installation of right- of-way improvements. The structure shall be used as a single family dwelling uni t only and shall otherwise conform to the City's zoning Code standards. I f determined necessary by the Department of Publ ic Works, a drainage system capable of handling and disposing of all surface water originating within the development, and all surface waters that may flow onto the development from adjacent lands, shall be required. Said drainage system shall include any easements and structures as required by the Director of Public Works to properly handle the drainage. (5) Concentrated water flows across sidewalks shall not be permitted. driveways and/ or (6) Prior to final Building Permit approval, the property owner shall have recorded a Covenant agreeing to maintain landscape height at, or below, the height of the structure. Said landscaping shall be trimmed to the structure's height, or below, prior to final sign off by the Department of Community Development. (7) If determined necessary by the Fire Prevention Department, the future structure to be constructed shall be subject to the City's requirements for Fire sprinkler suppression systems. CO/O4/CRO6-306WP5 (6-22-89-1 (8) A licensed surveyor shall verify the height of the structure at the time of framing inspection to certify that the height does not exceed the height measures specified on the approved plans. (9) Prior to foundation and/or pad preparation for the proposed remodel, the property shall be staked and lined to indicate all property lines to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. (10) All lighting on the subject property shall be shielded at all times to limit any light exposure or glare to interfere with the enjoyment of surrounding residential property to the satisfaction of the Director of community Development. (11) Proof of approval or exemption of this project by the Coastal Commission shall be provided prior to issuance of building permits. (12) The owner(s) shall record a covenant with the County Recorder's Office which unconditionally waives any claims of liability against the City and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and City's employees relative to the approval of the variance request and the construction of support pillars and walls adjacent to the proposed swimming pool. (13) The applicant shall plant mature landscaping to screen the view towards the neighboring property to the south. Said landscaping shall be in place prior to final approval for occupancy and shall screen the view to the satisfaction of the Director of community Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that: This project was found to be exempt from environmental review, section 15301(e) (a) of CEQA. CO/O4/CRO6-306WP5 (6-22-89-1 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: McCabe, Crosthwaite, Barker, Orr, MacManus NAYS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ~~ T rrance Barker, Chairperson of the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board ATTEST: {;¡u,.tL, ~ . c.~~ Craig R. Olson Assistant Planner CO/O4/CRO6-306WP5 (6-22-89-1