1988-52
RBSOLUTION NO. C-88-052
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA
'---- COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD, CITY OF ENCINITAS
APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION TO ALLOW
A DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT ON THREE LOTS AT 2166 EDINBURG AVENUE
(CASE NUMBER: 88-278-DR)
WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Design Review
application was filed by Thomas Young to allow a duplex
development, as per Chapter 23.08 of the city of Encinitas
Municipal/Zoning Codes, for the property located at 2166 Edinburg
Avenue, legally described as:
LOTS 17, 18, AND 19 IN BLOCK "E" OF CARDIFF "A" IN THE CITY
OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 1334, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 12, 1911.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application on
November 28, and December 12, 19.88; and all persons desiring to
heard were heard; and
""--,,
WHEREAS, ev idence was submitted and considered to include
without limitation:
1. The staff reports dated November 23, and December 7,
1988;
2. The proposed General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Zoning
Code and maps;
3. Oral evidence submitted at the hearing;
4. written evidence submitted at the hearing;
5. Documentation and site plans submitted by the applicant;
and
6. Environmental consideration per CEQA.
"'-.--/ CO/03/CRO2-189wp 1(1-03-89)
.
WHEREAS, the Cardiff-by-the-Sea community Advisory Board made
'-- the following findings pursuant to Section 23.08 of the Zoning Code
(see attachment "A").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
Community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that the Design
Review Application is hereby approved subject to the following
conditions:
(1) The project as submitted is approved and shall not be altered
without city approval.
(2) Landscaping and an automated irrigation system shall be
provided per the landscape plan submitted and approved. The
property owner shall sign and record a covenant to prohibit
landscaping from blocking views by exceeding 26 feet in
height.
(3) An Irrevocable Offer to Dedication shall be made for 10 feet
along Edinburg Avenue adj acent to the property for road
purposes. Edinburg Avenue is classified as a local street
requiring a 60 foot right-of-way or 30 feet from centerline.
""--,
(4) The property owner shall execute and record a covenant for the
benefit of the City with the County Recorder agreeing not to
oppose the formation of an assessment district to fund the
installation of right-of-way improvements.
(5) A licensed surveyor shall verify the height of the structure
at the time of framing inspection to certify that the height
does not exceed the height measurements specified on the
approved plans.
(6) The developer shall pay Traffic and Drainage Mitigation Fees
at the established rate at the date of final inspection or the
date the certificate of occupancy is issued, whichever occurs
later.
(7) Should the Department of Public Works determine it necessary,
a grading plan, in accordance with the city's grading
ordinance, shall be submitted to , and approved by, the Public
Works Department prior to the issuance of a building permit.
A soils report, prepared by a qualified engineer, shall be
submitted to the Public Works Department at first submittal
of a grading plan.
'-- CO/03/CRO2-189wp 2(1-03-89)
'.
(8) Should the Department of Public Works determine it necessary,
a drainage system plan for handling and disposing of surface
--- water originating within the project shall be submitted to,
and approved by, the Department of Public Works. Concentrated
flows across driveways and/or sidewalks shall not be
permitted.
(9) The alley adjacent to the rear property line shall be improved
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
(10) Improvement plans prepared on standard size sheets by a
Registered civil Engineer shall be submitted for approval by
the Director of Public Works. Plan check and inspection
expenses shall be paid by the developer.
(11) Fire sprinkler suppression systems shall be installed per NFPA
13D and Encinitas Fire Ordinance Specifications.
(12) The applicant shall prepare, and cause to be recorded, a
certificate of Compliance which shall merge the three lots
into a single legal lot.
(13) Other standard requirements for engineering and fire code
approval shall be satisfied by the project developer.
~'
------ CO/03/CRO2-189wp 3(1-03-89)
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-sea Community
"'-
Advisory Board of the city of Encinitas that:
(1) This project was found to be exempt from environmental
review, section 15303; Class 3(a) of CEQA.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of December, 1988, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Crosthwaite, Shannon, Barker
NAYS: Orr
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None ~
0 Ann Shannon, Chairperson
the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
ommunity Advisory Board
&:[ . oQ~
~ Assistant Planner
craig R. Olson
---.- CO/03/CRO2-189wp 4(1-03-89)
'"
I
ATTACHMENT "A"
',,---, / cardiff-by-the-sea Community Advisory Board
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-052
CASE NO. 88-278-DR
Findings For Design Review
(Section 23.08.076 Municipal Code)
23.08.072 Reaulatory Conclusions - GenerallY.
A. The project design is consistent with the General
Plan, a Specific Plan or the provisions of this Code.
Evidence to consider:
The project conforms to existing General Plan and zoning Code
Requirements for the subject site since it conforms to the
density (10.9 Du/Ac) and zoning setback, parking and height
requirements.
B. The project design is substantially consistent with
the Design Review Guidelines.
Evidence to consider:
"-.--- The project conforms with architectural, landscape, and
circulation specified in the guidelines for design review.
C. The project would not adversely affect the health,
safety or general welfare of the community.
Evidence to Consider:
The project does not intensify the existing use of the subject
location since two duplex dwelling units are proposed and must
conform to a Density Compatibility Study in conformance with
Ordinance 87-69.
D. The project would not tend to cause the surrounding
neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or value.
Evidence to Consider:
The project provides architectural variation to the front,
sides, and rear elevations of the structure; and is compatible
in structural size to adjacent properties and the
neighborhood.
~ CO/03/CRO2-189wp 5(1-03-89)