1988-37
,
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-037
I A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA
.
: COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO A
I DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR PROPERTY OF LOTS 21 AND 22,
BLOCK 22, MAP 1298, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, .
¡: CITY OF ENCINTAS (COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2280 MONTGOMERY AVENUE)
WHEREAS. I' Lyle J. Stewart applied for a modification to a
Design Review permit to allow the flat roof to be constructed
and for the chimneys to encroach a~ove
at 16' above the crown of the street/.for two zero lot line t at
-
dwelling units on two lots as per Chapter 23.08 Design Review,
of the City of Encinitas Zoning Ordinance;
WHEREAS, a' public hearing was conducted on the
application by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board
on September 12, 1988 and all persons desiring to be heard were
heard; and
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include
without limitation:
a. Site'plan submitted by the applicant;
b. Written information submitted with the application;
c. Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made
, a part of the record at said public hearing;
d. CAB staff report (87-20t-DR) dated September 7, 1988
which is on file in the Department of Planning and
Community Development; and
e. Additional written documentation.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
LN/ln/CABll-599wpa (5-17-88)
Community Advisory Board of the city of Encinitas that the
modification to the Design Review permit for two zero lot line
dwelling units is hereby approved subject to the following
,
. findings:
I
.
1. That the proposed project is in conformance with
section 23.08.72 of the Design Review Ordinance,
since the project is consistent with the existing and
proposed general plan and is an allowed use in the
RV-ll zone;
2. That the proposed project is in conformance with
section 23.08.74 of the Design Review Ordinance,
since the project design is proposed to set into the
site as much as possible and the required interim
ordinance setbacks are being maintained;
3. That the " proposed project is in conformance with
section 23.08.76 of the Design Review Ordinance,
since the project design is compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood and is of a similar scale
and bulk as other projects being constructed;
4. That the proposed project is in conformance with
section 23.08.77 of the Design Review Ordinance,
since the project is proposing landscaping that is
compatible with the neighborhood and will be
maintained at the height of the building in order to
help preserve views;
5. The project design does preserve significant public
views to the extent possible, and offers mitigation
for lost views, since the structure is proposed at
16' above the crown of the street, and the CAB has
determined that some of the significant views are
being maintained for neighboring properties with the
project at 16';
6. The project takes advantage of views and/or protects,
to the extent possible, some of the significant view
enjoyed by the residents of nearby properties, since
it is proposed to be constructed at 16' above the
LN/ln/CAB11-599wpa (5-17-88)
crown of the street;
7. That the projection out of the interim envelope does
not significantly impact the views of adjacent
. properties, in that the proj ect takes advantage of
views while maintaining some of the significant views
I enjoyed by residents of nearby properties and soma
significant views will be retained through the
subject site to the west;
8. That the project is compatible in structural size
(bulk and mass) to adjacent properties and
neighborhood since it is proposed to be of a similar
size as the existing structures in the neighborhood;
9. There is reasonable probability that the land use and
des ign proposed will be consistent with the General
Plan proposal being considered or studied, since the
density and zone is not proposed to be changed;
10. There is' little or no probability 'of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed design is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan since it is a use that is
proposed to be allowed; and
11. The proposed design complies with all other
applicable requirements of state law and local
ordinances.
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that the Design Review Permit is
approved with.the following conditions:
A. The project is approved as submitted and shall not be
altered without Community Advisory Board review and
approval.
B. Prior to the City Building Department issuing a
final inspection" on framing, the applicant shall
prov ide a survey from a civil engineer as to the
building height.
C. The alley shall be resurfaced with a minimum 1" of
asphalt overlay.
LN/ln/CABll-599wpa (5-17-88)
D. A covenant shall be recorded at the County Recorders
office agreeing to plant the landscaping on the
approved landscape plan and to maintain the
landscaping at a height no higer than the height of
the structure. .
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of September, 1988 by
the followi~g vote, to wit:
AYES: Slater, Crosthwaite, Shannon" Orr
NAYS: Barker
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
of the
ATTEST:
~;¿ J50S;2 ~ /
DA S. NILES,
Assistant Planner
LN/ln/CABll-599wpa (5-17-88)
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-037
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO A
DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR PROPERTY OF LOTS 21 AND 22,
BLOCK 22, MAP 1298, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
CITY OF ENCINTAS (COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2280 MONTGOMERY AVENUE)
WHEREAS, Lyle J. Stewart applied for a modification to a
Design Review permit to allow the flat roof to be constructed
at 16' above the crown of the street, and for chimneys to
encroach into the required sideyard set backs for two zero lot
line dwelling units on two lots as per Chapter 23.08 Design
Review, of the City of Encinitas Zoning Ordinance;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the
application by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board
on September 12, 1988 and all persons desiring to be heard were
heard; and
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include
without limitation:
a. site plan submitted by the applicant;
b. written information submitted with the application;
c. Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made
a part of the record at said public hearing;
d. CAB staff report (87-201-DR) dated September 7, 1988
which is on file in the Department of Planning and
Community Development; and
e. Additional written documentation.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
LN/ln/CABll-599wpa (5-17-88)
Community Advisory Board of the city of Encinitas that the
modification to the Design Review permit for two zero lot line
dwelling units is hereby approved subject to the following
findings:
1. That the proposed project is in conformance with
section 23.08.72 of the Design Review Ordinance,
since the project is consistent with the existing and
proposed general plan and is an allowed use in the
RV-11 zone;
2. That the proposed project is in conformance with
Section 23.08.74 of the Design Review Ordinance,
since the project design is proposed to set into the
site as much as possible and the required interim
ordinance setbacks are being maintained;
3. That the proposed project is in conformance with
Section 23.08.76 of the Design Review ordinance,
since the project design is compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood and is of a similar scale
and bulk as other projects being constructed;
4. That the proposed project is in conformance with
section 23.08.77 of the Design Review Ordinance,
since the project is proposing landscaping that is
compatible with the neighborhood and will be
maintained at the height of the building in order to
help preserve views;
5. The project design does preserve significant public
views to the extent possible, and offers mitigation
for lost views, since the structure is proposed at
16' above the crown of the street, and the CAB has
determined that some of the significant views are
being maintained for neighboring properties with the
project at 16';
6. The project takes advantage of views and/or protects,
to the extent possible, some of the significant view
enjoyed by the residents of nearby properties, since
it is proposed to be constructed at 16' above the
LN/ln/CABll-599wpa (5-17-88)
crown of the street;
7. That the projection out of the interim envelope does
not significantly impact the views of adjacent
properties, in that the project takes advantage of
views while maintaining some of the significant views
enjoyed by residents of nearby properties and some
significant views will be retained through the
subject site to the west;
8. That the project is compatible in structural size
(bulk and mass) to adjacent properties and
neighborhood since it is proposed to be of a similar
size as the existing structures in the neighborhood;
9. There is reasonable probability that the land use and
design proposed will be consistent with the General
Plan proposal being considered or studied, since the
density and zone is not proposed to be changed;
10. There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed design is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan since it is a use that is
proposed to be allowed; and
11. The proposed design complies with all other
applicable requirements of state law and local
ordinances.
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that the Design Review Permit is
approved with the following conditions:
A. The project is approved as submitted and shall not be
altered without Community Advisory Board review and
approval.
B. Prior to the City Building Department issuing a
final inspection on framing, the applicant shall
prov ide a survey from a civil engineer as to the
building height.
C. The alley shall be resurfaced with a minimum 1" of
asphalt overlay.
LN/ln/CABll-599wpa (5-17-88)
D. A covenant shall be recorded at the County Recorders
office agreeing to plant the landscaping on the
approved landscape plan and to maintain the
landscaping at a height no higer than the height of
the structure.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of September, 1988 by
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Slater, Crosthwaite, Shannon, Orr
NAYS: Barker
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ANN SHANNON, Chairman of the
rdiff-by-the-Sea
ommunity Advisory Board
ATTEST:
~cp
"j;
I DA S. NILES,
Assistant Planner
LN/ln/CABll-599wpa (5-17-88)
APPLICATION FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
APPENDIX B
LOCAL AGENCY REVIEW FORM
ISECTION A (To be completed by applicant)
Applicant WU;: ~ kA-)#~ 5~AAr / ()JIW*- ~ 5 (..Çë.. 'i
t
Project description OOh,} STJt.tJc. T1 otJ If ::' :2,-0 Lor L¡IJI;t SI~LÆ. F"~I t.."t
'btüt:<:.LU),)(.,
Location )..2 eo M ONïc"oM R4l.1 Av-E." CAR.o~ e4 ~ SiGA- (4. q~7
.
Assessor's Parcel Number 2(,,/, - 077-"- ~ l
-2-"2....-
¡SECTION B (To be completed by local planning or building inspection department)!
Zoning designation <'V-I! lð ' ~ sç du/ac
I
General or Community Plan designation ~? /0 19 du/ac
Local Discretionary Approvals
,
[] Proposed development meets all zoning requirements and needs no local permits
other than building permits.
[] Proposed develop~ent needs local discretionary approvals noted below.
Needed Received
0 ß Design/Architectural review r?~J- <3<'b -~~ ~~N
0 0 Vari ance for ~ tJ¡ ) ~,
0 0 Rezone from ¿wi <i</" / ~ ,'7 ~
[] 0 Tentati ve Subdi vi s i on/Parce 1 r~ap No. / ð I[).) ~~
[] 0 Grading/Land Development Permit No. /YJ.
0 0 Planned Residential/Commercial Development
0 0 Site Plan Review
[] 0 Condominium Conversion Permit
[] 0 Conditional, Special, or Major Use Permit No.
[] 0 Other
CEQA Status
0 Categorically Exempt - Class q Item a
0 Negative Declaration Granted
- [] Environmental Impact Report Required, Final Report certified
Prepa",d for the CiÃcounty of ~tU~liu byr£1~ ; ~1:
Da te / ;;,1 ó1 / '6. Tit 1 e .i!Mtto/
/