1988-32
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-032
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD, CITY OF ENCINITAS,
APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION TO ALLOW
TWO ZERO LOT LINE DWELLINGS
LOCATED AT 2055-57 OXFORD AVENUE
(CASE NUMBER 88-237 DR)
WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Design Review
Application was filed by Joseph Birdsell and William stepp to allow
two zero lot line dwellings, as per Chapter 23.08 of the City of
Encinitas Municipal/Zoning Codes, for the property located at 2055-
2057 Oxford Avenue, legally described as;
Lots 33 and 34, Block 38 of Cardiff "A" in the County of San
Diego, state of California, according to Map thereof No. 1334,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County; May
12, 1911.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application on
September 26, 1988; and all persons desiring to be heard were
heard; and
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include
without limitation:
1. The staff report dated September 21, 1988;
2. The proposed General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Zoning
Code and maps;
CO/02/CAB9-972WP 5(10-11-88-1)
3. Oral evidence submitted at the hearing;
4. written evidence submitted the hearing;
5. Documentation and site plans submitted by the applicant;
and
6. Environmental consideration per CEQA.
WHEREAS, the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board made
the following findings pursuant to section 23.08 of the Zoning Code
and Ordinance 88-19 (see Attachment "A").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that the Design
Review Application is hereby approved subject to the following
conditions:
(1) The project as submitted is approved and shall not be altered
without City approval.
(2) Landscaping and an automated irrigation system shall be
provided per the landscape plan submitted and approved. The
property owner shall sign and record a covenant to prohibit
landscaping from blocking views.
(3) An Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall be made for 10 feet
along Oxford Avenue adjacent to the property for road
purposes. Oxford is classified as a local street requiring
a 60 foot right-of-way or 30 feet from centerline.
(4) The property owner shall execute and record a covenant for
the benefit of the city with the County Recorder agreeing not
to oppose the formation of an assessment district to fund the
installation of right-of-way improvements.
(5) A licensed surveyor shall verify the height of the structure
at the time of framing inspection to certify that the height
does not exceed the height measurements specified on the
approved plans.
(6) Planter box and bay window projections into the side yards
CO/02/CAB9-972WP 6(10-11-88-1)
shall not exceed 2 feet in distance from the main structure.
(7) other standard requirements for engineering and fire code
approval shall be satisfied by the project developer.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea community
Advisory Board of the city of Encinitas that:
(1) This project was found to be exempt from environmental
review, section 15303; Class 3(a) of CEQA.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26 day of September, 1988, by the
following, to wit:
AYES: Barker, Crosthwaite, Orr, Slater
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Shannon
ABSTAIN: None
2~~-
Pamela Slater, vice-Chairperson
of the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
community Advisory Board
ATTEST:
~R.-. ~
Assistant Planner
Craig R. Olson
CO/02/CAB9-972WP 7(10-11-88-1)
ATTACHMENT "A"
Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-032
CASE NO. 88-237-DR
Findings For Design Review
(Section 23.08.076 Municipal Code)
23.08.072 Requlatory Conclusions - Generally.
A. The project design is consistent with the General
Plan, a Specific Plan or the provisions of this Code.
Evidence to Consider:
The project conforms to existing General Plan and Zoning Code
Requirements for the subject site since it conforms to the
density (10.9 Duj Ac) and zoning setback, parking and height
requirements.
B. The project design is substantially consistent with
the Design Review Guidelines.
Evidence to Consider:
The project conforms with architectural, landscape, and
circulation specified in the guidelines for design review.
C. The project would not adversely affect the health,
safety or general welfare of the community.
Evidence to consider:
The project does not intensify the existing use of the subject
location since two single family dwellings are proposed.
D. The project would not tend to cause the surrounding
neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or value.
Evidence to Consider:
The proj ect provides architectural variation to the front,
sides, and rear elevations of the structure; and is compatible
in structural size to adjacent properties and the
neighborhood.
COj02/CAB9-972WP 8(10-11-88-1)