1988-31
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-031
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A
DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR THE REMODEL OF AN
EXISTING DUPLEX DWELLING LOCATED AT
2319 & 2317 OXFORD AVENUE (88-236-DR)
WHEREAS,
a request for consideration of a Design Review
Application was filed by Arthur F. Vlastnik to allow the remodel
of a duplex dwelling, as per Chapter 23.08 of the City of Encinitas
Municipal/Zoning Codes, for the property located at 2317 and 2319
Oxford Avenue, legally described as;
Lots number 43 and 44 in Block 13, Cardiff; according to the
Map #1298, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San
Diego County, November 14, 1910.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application on
September 26, 1988, and all persons desiring to be heard were
heard; and
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include
without limitation:
1.
The staff report dated September 21, 1988;
2.
The proposed General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Zoning
Code and maps;
3.
Oral evidence submitted at the hearing;
4.
written evidence submitted at the hearing;
CO/02/CAB10-980wp 4(10-11-88-1)
.
.
.
5.
Documentation and site plans submitted by the applicant;
and
WHEREAS, the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board made
the required findings pursuant to Ordinance 88-19 and section 23.08
of the Zoning Code (See Attachment "A").
NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
Community Advisory Board of the city of Encinitas that the Design
Review Application is hereby approved subject to the following
conditions:
(1)
(2)
(3)
The project as submitted is approved and shall not be
altered without City approval.
All structural improvements shall maintain the setback
requirements prescribed by the current zoning code for
the subject property.
An irrevocable offer of dedication shall be made for ten
(10) feet along Oxford Avenue adjacent to the property
for road purposes. Oxford is classified as a local
street requiring a 60 foot right-of-way or 30 feet from
centerline.
(4)
The permittee shall retain and maintain all existing
landscaping.
(5)
The property owner shall sign and record covenant
agreeing not to protest any proceedings for the
installation or acquisition of public improvements under
any applicable special assessment proceedings.
BE
RESOLVED
by
the
Cardiff-by-the-Sea
IT
FURTHER
Community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that:
(1)
This project was found to be exempt from environmental
review, Section 15303, Class 3(a) of CEQA.
CO/02/CAB10-980wp 5(10-11-88-1)
.
.
.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of September, 1988, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
Barker, Crosthwaite, Orr, Slater
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Shannon
ABSTAIN:
None
~~(~
Pamela Slater, vice-chairperson
of the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
Community Advisory Board
ATTEST:
~",e.~
Assistant Planner
Craig R. Olson
CO/O2/CAB10-980wp 6(10-11-88-1)
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT "A"
Cardiff-by-the-Sea (CAB/PC)
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-031
CASE NO. 88-288-DR
Findings For Design Review
(Section 23.08.076 Municipal Code)
23.08.072 Reaulatory Conclusions - GenerallY.
A. The project design is consistent with the General
Plan, a Specific Plan or the provisions of this Code.
Evidence to consider:
The project conforms to existing General Plan and zoning Code
requirements for the subject site since it conforms to the
density (10.9 Du/Ac) and zoning setback, parking and height
requirements.
B. The project design is substantially consistent with
the Design Review Guidelines.
Evidence to Consider:
The project conforms with architectural, landscape, and
circulation specified in the guidelines for Design Review.
C. The project would not adversely affect the health,
safety or general welfare of the community.
Evidence to Consider:
The project does not intensify the existing use of the subject
location since it will remain as a duplex dwelling.
D. The project would not tend to cause the surrounding
neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or value.
Evidence to Consider:
The project will add architectural variation to the front of
the structure; and is compatible in structural size to
adjacent properties and the neighborhood.
CO/02/CAB10-980wp 7(10-11-88-1)