1988-27
8
8
8
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-027
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A
DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR PROPERTY OF LOTS 21 AND 22,
BLOCK 22, MAP 1298, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
CITY OF ENCINTAS (COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2280 MONTGOMERY AVENUE)
WHEREAS,
Lyle J.
Stewart applied
for a Design Review
permit
for two zero lot line dwelling units on two
lots to be
constructed with a pitched roof at 16' 8" above the crown of
the street as per
Chapter 23.08 Design Review, of the City of
Encinitas Zoning
Ordinance;
WHEREAS, public hearings were conducted on the application
by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board
on April
11, and
June 2,1988,
and all persons desiring to be heard were
heard; and
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include
without limitation:
a.
site plan submitted by the applicant;
Written information submitted with the application;
Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made
a part of the record at said public hearing;
CAB staff reports (87-102-DR) dated April 6, and May
17, 1988 which are on file in the Department of
Planning and Community Development; and
Additional written documentation.
b.
c.
d.
e.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
Community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that the
Design
Review permit for two zero lot line dwelling units is
hereby approved subject to the following findings:
LN/1n/CAB11-599wpa (5-17-88)
8
8
8
1.
That the proposed project is in conformance with
section 23.08.72 of the Design Review Ordinance,
since the project is consistent with the existing and
proposed general plan and is an allowed use in the
RV-11 zone;
2.
That the proposed project is in conformance with
section 23.08.74 of the Design Review Ordinance,
since the project design is proposed to set into the
si te as much as possible and the required interim
ordinance setbacks are being maintained;
3.
That the proposed project is in conformance with
Section 23.08.76 of the Design Review Ordinance,
since the project design is compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood and is of a similar scale
and bulk as other projects being constructed;
4.
That the proposed project is in conformance with
Section 23.08.77 of the Design Review Ordinance,
since the proj ect is proposing landscaping that is
compatible with the neighborhood and will be
maintained at the height of the building in order to
help preserve views;
5.
The project design does preserve significant public
views to the extent possible, and offers mitigation
for lost views, since the structure is proposed at
16' 8" above the crown of the street, and the CAB has
determined that some of the significant views are
being maintained for neighboring properties with the
project at 16' 8";
6.
The project takes advantage of views and/or protects,
to the extent possible, some of the significant view
enjoyed by the residents of nearby properties, since
it is proposed to be constructed at 16' 8" above the
crown of the street;
7.
That the projection out of the interim envelope does
not significantly impact the views of adjacent
properties, in that the proj ect takes advantage of
views while maintaining some of the significant views
enjoyed by residents of nearby properties and some
LN/ln/CABll-599wpa (5-17-88)
-
8
8
8
11.
significant views will be
subject site to the west;
retained
through
the
8.
That the proj ect is compatible in structural size
(bulk and mass) to adjacent properties and
neighborhood since it is proposed to be of a similar
size as the existing structures in the neighborhood;
9.
There is reasonable probability that the land use and
design proposed will be consistent with the General
Plan proposal being considered or studied, since the
density and zone is not proposed to be changed;
10.
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed design is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan since it is a use that is
proposed to be allowed; and
The proposed design complies with all
applicable requirements of state law and
ordinances.
other
local
approved
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED,
that the Design Review Permit is
A.
B.
C.
D.
with the following conditions:
The project is approved as submitted and shall not be
altered without Community Advisory Board review and
approval.
Prior to the City Building Department issuing a
final inspection on framing, the applicant shall
provide a survey from a civil engineer as to the
building height.
The alley shall be resurfaced with a minimum 1" of
asphalt overlay.
A covenant shall be recorded at the County Recorders
office agreeing to plant the landscaping on the
approved landscape plan and to maintain the
landscaping at a height no higer than the height of
the structure.
LN/ln/CAB11-599wpa (5-17-88)
8
,,8
8
PASSED AND ADOPTED
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
this 2nd day of June,
1988 by the
Boardmembers Winkler, Slater, Barker, Shannon
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Hirsch
ABSTAIN:
None
ATTEST:
LN/ln/CAB11-599wpa (5-17-88)
ANN SHANNON, Chairman of the
rdiff-by-the-Sea
ommunity Advisory Board
----..J