1988-25
8
8
8
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD
CITY OF ENCINITAS, APPROVING A REMODEL TO ALLOW
AN ADDITION TO PROJECT INTO THE REQUIRED 20' FRONT YARD
SETBACK PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE 88-19
LOCATED AT 2033 CAMBRIDGE
(CASE NUMBER 88-156/DR)
WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Design Review
application filed by Joseph Cobbs to allow a 4.5'projection into
the required 20' front yard setback as per Ordinance 88-19 of
the
City
2033
Encinitas,
of
for
;the
property
located
at
Cambridge, legally described as;
Lots 37 and 38 of Block 39 of Map No. 1334.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application
on July 25, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the Community Advisory Board/Planning Commission
considered:
1.
The staff report dated July 20, 1988;
The application and maps submitted by the applicant;
2.
3.
Oral evidence submitted at the hearing;
4.
Written evidence submitted at the hearing.
WHEREAS, the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board
made the following findings pursuant to the Ordinance 88-~
and 23.08.076 of the Municipal Code.
SEE ATTACHMENT "A"
PM04/CRO2-95WP (7-20-88)
8
8
8
ATTACHMENT "A"
CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD
RESOLUTION NO. 88-
CASE NO. 88-156/DR
Findings For Design Review
(Section 23.08.076 Municipal Code)
23.08.072 Reaulatory Conclusions - GenerallY.
A. The project design is consistent with the General
Plan, a Specific Plan or the provisions of this Code.
Evidence to Consider:
The project proposes a 989 sq. ft. addition to an existing
2,664 sq. ft. house on a 50 x 100' lot within an RV-11 zone.
This is consistent with the General Plan.
B. The project design is substantially consistent with
the Design Review Guidelines.
Evidence to Consider:
The addi tion and remodel proposes a design to be consistent
with the existing spanish design with white stucco and red tile
roofing.
C. The project would not adversely affect the health,
safety or general welfare of the community.
Evidence to Consider:
The addition is wi thin the existing envelope of the existing
structure not impacting any views or other community issues.
D. The project would tend to cause the surrounding
neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or value.
Evidence to Consider:
The proposed addition is small and will be consistent with the
design of the existing structure.
Pursuant to Ordinance 88-19 the following findings are made:
Findings:
1.
The project design does preserve significant public
views to the extent possible, nor does it offer
mitigation for lost views. Public views are defined
as those views provided from public property.
PM04/CRO2-95WP (7-20-88)
8
8
8
2.
The project does take advantage of views and/or does
protect, to the extent possible, some of the
significant view enj oyed by the residents of nearby
properties that would be blocked by the project, as
proposed.
Evidence to Consider:
The proposed addition does not exceed the current height or the
current setbacks of the existing structure.
The addition is on the west side of the property not impacting
any westerly views greater than what is already impacted as a
result of existing two story structure.
Pursuant to Ordinance 87-80 the following findings are made:
a.
There is a reasonable probability that the land use
and design proposed will be consistent with the
General Plan proposal being considered or studied or
which will be studied within a reasonable time.
b.
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed use or design is
ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
The proposed use or design complies with all other
applicable requirements of state law and local
ordinances.
c.
Evidence to Consider:
The project is an addition to an existing single family
dwelling on a 50' x 100' lot. The use is permitted under
existing and proposed General Plans. As such, the proposal is
consistent with the anticipated General Plan. Should this
consistency be ultimately incorrect there would be no
probability of substantial detriment to the General Plan due to
the small project, i.e., 989 sq. ft. addition to an existing
single family home.
PM04/CRO2-95WP (7-20-88)
8
8
8
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
Community Advisory Board of the city of Encinitas that the
Design Review application is hereby approved with the following conditions:
1.
That the applicant record a Certificate of 'Compliance in the office of
the County Recorder prior to final occupancy authorization.
2.
That the applicant record a covenant agreeing to maintain the landscaping
at a height at or below the height of the building.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community
Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that:
(1)
This proj ect was found to be exempt from environmental
review, Section 15301(e) (CEQA) Class 1.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of July,
1988, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
Boardmembers Slater, Barker, Shannon
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
None
ABSTAIN: None
~
Ann Shannon, Chairman of
he Cardiff-by-the-Sea
Community Advisory Board
Board
ATTEST:
~ (2.. ~
Assistant Planner
PM04/CRO2-95WP (7-20-88)