1988-15B
8
8
8
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-015B
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A
DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR PROPERTY OF LOTS 5 & 6,
BLOCK 8, MAP 1298, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
(COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2426 MANCHESTER AVENUE)
WHEREAS, Stan Keiser applied for a Design Review permit
for two zero lot line dwelling units on two lots to encroach
into the required 7'
side yard setback by 2' for the second
level (the level that accesses directly off of Manchester) for
the portion directly over the garages
as required
in City
council Ordinance 87-68 Cardiff Interim development standards
and
Chapter
23.08
Design Review,
of the City of
as
per
Encinitas Zoning
Ordinance;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application
by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea community Advisory Board
on April
25, 1988 and all persons desiring to be heard were heard; and
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include
without limitation:
a.
site plan submitted by the applicant;
written information submitted with the application;
Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made
a part of the record at said public hearing;
CAB staff report (88-050-DR) dated April 20, 1988
which is on file in the Department of Planning and
community Development; and
Additional written documentation.
b.
c.
d.
e.
LN/CAB11b-622Wp
8
8
8
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that the
Design
Review permit for two zero lot line dwelling units is
hereby approved subject to the following findings:
1.
That the proposed proj ect is in conformance with
the intent of section 23.08.72 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through D;
2.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.74 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through J;
3.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.76 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through G;
4.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.77 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through D;
5.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.79 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through F;
6.
The project design does preserve significant public
views to the extent possible, and offers mitigation
for lost views. Public views are defined as those
views provided from public property;
7.
The project takes advantage of views and/or protects,
to the extent possible, some of the significant view
enjoyed by the residents of nearby properties;
8.
That the projection out of the interim envelope does
not significantly impact the views of adjacent
properties, in that view is still maintained through
some of the project site;
LN/CAB11b-622wp
8
8
8
9.
10.
11.
12.
That the proj ect is compatible in structural size
(bulk and mass) to adjacent properties and
neighborhood;
There is reasonable probability that the land use and
design proposed will be consistent with the General
Plan proposal being considered or studied;
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed design is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan; and
The proposed design complies with all
applicable requirements of state law and
ordinances.
other
local
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED,
that the Design Review Permit is
approved
A.
B.
C.
with the following conditions:
The project is approved as submitted and shall not be
altered without community Advisory Board review and
approval.
Prior to the City Building Department issuing a
final inspection on framing, the applicant shall
provide a survey from a civil engineer as to the
building height.
The alley shall be paved to Dublin to the
satisfaction of the Department of Public Works and
the applicant shall execute and record a covenant
with the County Recorder agreeing not to oppose the
formation of an assessment district to fund the
installation of right-of-way improvements.
D.
A covenant shall be recorded at the County Recorders
office agreeing to the plant the landscaping on the
approved landscape plan and to maintain that at or
below the height of the structure.
LN/CAB11b-622Wp
8
8
~
PASSED AND ADOPTED
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Boardmembers
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
this 25th day of April, 1988 by the
Hirsch, Slater, Shannon and Winkler
ANN SiiANNON, Chairman of the
rdiff-by-the-Sea
ommunity Advisory Board
ATTEST:
ç¡¡f;/J¿{ ~ ~ âpt
LI A S. NILES, /
Assistant Planner
LN/ln/CAB11-621wp (4-20-88)