1988-15A
8
8
8
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-015A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A
DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR PROPERTY OF LOTS 25-28,
BLOCK 13, MAP 1298, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
(COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2385 OXFORD AVENUE)
WHEREAS,
Rimmer Development Corp.
applied for a Design
Review permit
for two zero lot line dwelling units on two
lots and one single family detached dwelling unit on two lots
as per
Chapter 23.08 Design Review, of the City of Encinitas
zoning
Ordinance;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application
by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea community Advisory Board
on April
25, 1988 and all persons desiring to be heard were heard; and
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include
without limitation:
a.
Site plan submitted by the applicant;
written information submitted with the application;
Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made
a part of the record at said public hearing;
CAB staff report (88-04 7-DR) dated April 21, 1988
which is on file in the Department of Planning and
Community Development; and
Additional written documentation.
b.
c.
d.
e.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
community Advisory Board of the city of Encinitas that the
Design
Review permit for two zero lot line dwelling units on
two lots and one single family detached dwelling unit on two
lots is hereby approved subject to the following findings:
LN/ln/CABll-621wp (4-21-88)
1.
8
2.
3.
4.
8
8
That the proposed proj ect is in conformance with
the intent of section 23.08.72 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through D;
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of Section 23.08.74 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through J;
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of Section 23.08.76 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through G;
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.77 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through D;
5.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.79 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through F;
6.
The project design does preserve significant public
views to the extent possible, and offers mitigation
for lost views. Public views are defined as those
views provided from public property;
7.
The project takes advantage of views and/or protects,
to the extent possible, some of the significant view
enjoyed by the residents of nearby properties;
That the projection out of the interim envelope does
not significantly impact the views of adjacent
properties, in that the proj ect takes advantage of
views while maintaining some of the significant views
enjoyed by residents of nearby properties;
8.
9.
That the proj ect is compatible in structural size
(bulk and mass) to adjacent properties and
neighborhood;
10.
There is reasonable probability that the land use and
design proposed will be consistent with the General
Plan proposal being considered or studied;
11.
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed design is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan; and
LN/ln/CAB11-621wp (4-21-88)
8
8
8
12.
The proposed design complies with all
applicable requirements of state law and
ordinances.
other
local
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED,
that the Design Review Permit is
approved
A.
B.
C.
D.
with the following conditions:
The project is approved as submitted with the
addition of a retaining wall on the north property
line of the project and shall not be altered without
community Advisory Board review and approval.
~rior to the City Building Department issuing a
final inspection on framing, the applicant shall
provide a survey from a civil engineer as to the
building height.
The alley shall be paved to Dublin to the
satisfaction of the Department of Public Works and a
drainage plan shall be submitted to handle the
drainage problem in the alley at the time plans are
submi tted for building permits. The drainage plans
shall be approved by the Department of Public Works.
A covenant shall be recorded at the County Recorders
office agreeing to the plant the landscaping on the
approved landscape plan and to maintain that at or
below the height of the structure.
PASSED AND ADOPTED
this 25th day of April, 1988 by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Boardmembers Shannon, Slater, Hirsch and Winkler
None
None
None
ANN SiiANNON, Chairman of the
rdiff-by-the-Sea
ommunity Advisory Board
~-5;~
D 'A S. NILES,
Assistant Planner
LN/ln/CABll-621wp (4-20-88)