1988-15
8
8
8
'-q
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-015
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT
FOR 2 ZERO LOT LINE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS
FOR PROPERTY OF LOTS 31 AND 32, IN BLOCK 28 OF CARDIFF,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, MAP 1298, CITY OF ENCINITAS
(AL-SO fl.,NOwlV A~ 1-ltQE) ANt:> 2/&'7 (Y)oNTG-OmE.-RY AV£~
WHEREAS,
William J.
Stepp applied for a Design Review
permit
for two zero lot line single family dwellings on two
lots as per
Chapter 23.08
Design Review,
of the City of
Encinitas Zoning
Ordinance;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application
by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board
on January
25, February
22, and April 25, 1988, and all persons desiring
to be heard were heard; and
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include
without limitation:
a.
site plan submitted by the applicant;
written information submitted with the application;
Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made
a part of the record at said public hearing;
CAB staff reports (87-137-DR) dated January 25,
February 22, and April 25, 1988, which is on file in
the Department of Planning and Community
Development; and
Additional written documentation.
b.
c.
d.
e.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
Community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that the
Design
Review permit for two zero lot line single family
dwelling units
on two lots is hereby approved subject to the
following findings:
1.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.72 of the Design Review
LN/ln/CABll-456wpA (4-19-88)
,
8
2.
8
8
ordinance, since the project is consistent with the
proposed General Plan in that the density of one unit
per lot is allowed in the RV-11 zone;
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of Section 23.08.74 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is designed to take
advantage of the site constraints, preserves
significant views, and is proposing visitor parking
which will contribute to less parking congestion on
the street and alley;
3.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.76 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with the
bulk and scale of the neighborhood, and the design
elements of the project are harmonious with each
other and the neighboring properties;
4.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.77 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the landscape design will reach a
mature stage in three years so as to provide
softening of the elevations of the structure, and
will blend in with the design aspects of the
structure providing an aesthetically pleasing
streetscape;
5.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.79 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project design takes into
consideration the privacy of the occupants of the
proposed uni ts and adj acent property units to the
extent possible.
6.
The project design does preserve significant public
views to the extent possible, and offers mitigation
for lost views, since it has been designed within the
interim development height limits as measured from
natural grade. Public views are defined as those
views provided from public property;
7.
The project takes advantage of views and/or protects,
to the extent possible, some of the significant view
enjoyed by the residents of nearby properties, since
minimal sideyard projections and limited heights have
been proposed;
8.
That the projection out of the interim envelope does
not significantly impact the views of adjacent
properties, in that the proj ect takes advantage of
views while maintaining some of the significant views
LN/ln/CABll-456wpA (4-19-88)
8
9.
10.
11.
12.
8
enjoyed by residents of nearby properties, since the
encroachments into the sideyard setbacks are minimal
for bay windows and an access stair and walkway;
That the project is compatible in structural size
(bulk and mass) to adjacent properties and
neighborhood, since it has been designed to be
smaller in size than the existing apartment complexes
in the neighborhood;
There is reasonable probability that the land use and
design proposed will be consistent with the General
Plan proposal being considered or studied, since no
change is being considered for the zoning in this
area;
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed design is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan, since the surrounding
area has considerable development of this size and
type; and
The proposed design complies with all
applicable requirements of state law and
ordinances.
other
local
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Design Review Permit is
approved subject to the following conditions:
A.
B.
C.
D.
8
The project is approved as submitted and shall not be
al tered without Community Advisory Board review and
approval.
Prior to the City Building Department issuing a
final inspection on framing, the applicant shall
provide a survey from a civil engineer as to the
building height.
Applicant shall record a covenant with the Office of
the County Recorder to ensure that landscaping shall
be planted in accordance with the approved landscape
plan and maintained at or below the height of the
structure.
That the applicant not oppose an assessment district
for improvement of the alley if necessary, in
accordance with standards setforth by the Department
of Public Works.
LN/ln/CAB11-456wpA (4-19-88)
8
8
8
E.
That the proposed sycamore tree be changed to a 20'
variety chosen from the Archiplan list and that staff
review the changes.
PASSED AND ADOPTED
this 25th day of April, 1988 by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Boardmembers
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Slater, Winkler, Hirsch, and Shannon
ANN SHANNON, Chairman of the
rdiff-by-the-Sea
ommunity Advisory Board
ATTEST: d
~~4
LIN S. NILES,
Assistant Planner
\j!ß d
LN/ln/CABll-456wpA (4-19-88)