1988-14
8
8
8
RESOLUTION NO.
C-88-014
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A
DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR TWO ZERO LOT LINE
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS FOR PROPERTY
OF LOTS 44 AND 45 IN BLOCK 18, CARDIFF, MAP 1369
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CITY OF ENCINITAS
WHEREAS, Bianco/Addison, Inc. applied for a Design Review
permit
for two zero lot line single family dwelling units on
two lots as per City Council Ordinance 87-68 Cardiff Interim
Zoning Regulations,
and Chapter 23.08 Design Review,
of the
City of Encinitas Zoning Ordinance;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application
by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea community Advisory Board on April 11,
1988 and all persons desiring to be heard were heard; and
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include
without limitation:
a.
site plan submitted by the applicant;
written information submitted with the application;
Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made
a part of the record at said public hearing;
CAB staff report (88-043-DR) dated March 23, 1988
which is on file in the Department of Planning and
Community Development; and
Additional written documentation.
b.
c.
d.
e.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
Community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that the
Design
Review permit for one single family dwelling unit
on
LN/CAB11b-0154wp
two lots is hereby approved subject to the following findings:
8
8
7.
8.
9.
10.
8
1.
That the proposed project is in conformance with
the intent of Section 23.08.72 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through D¡
2.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of Section 23.08.74 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through J;
3.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of Section 23.08.76 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through G;
4.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of Section 23.08.77 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through D;
5.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.79 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through F;
6.
The project design does preserve significant public
views to the extent possible, and offers mitigation
for lost views. Public views are defined as those
views provided from public property;
The project takes advantage of views and/or protects,
to the extent possible, some of the significant view
enjoyed by the residents of nearby properties;
That the projection out of the interim envelope does
not significantly impact the views of adjacent
properties, in that the project takes advantage of
views while maintaining some of the significant views
enjoyed by residents of nearby properties;
That the proj ect is compatible in structural size
(bulk and mass) to adjacent properties and
neighborhood;
There is reasonable probability that the land use and
design proposed will be consistent with the General
Plan proposal being considered or studied;
LN/CAB11b-0154wp
8
8
8
11.
12.
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed design is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan; and
The proposed design complies with all
applicable requirements of state law and
ordinances.
other
local
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED,
that the Design Review Permit is
approved
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
with the following conditions:
The project is approved as submitted and shall not be
altered without Community Advisory Board review and
approval.
Prior to the City Building Department issuing a final
inspection on framing, the applicant shall provide a
survey from a civil engineer as to the building
height.
Applicant shall submit to the Community Development
Department a security construction plan for review
and approval. Said plan shall identify any temporary
fencing, temporary parking and circulation, project
access and the like.
That the landscape plan and the height of the wall in
the front of the project be submitted for staff
review and approval in consideration of view
preservation and required heights of walls in the
front yard setback.
A covenant shall be recorded by Bianco/Addison, Inc.
agreeing to plant the landscape plan approved by
staff and to maintain the landscape at a height no
higher than the height of the building. Additionally,
the planting on the west elevation is required to
screen the slab from view at street level.
A covenant shall be executed
Bianco/Addison, Inc. with the
agreeing not to oppose the formation
district to fund the installation
improvements.
and recorded by
County Recorder
of an assessment
of right-of-way
LN/CAB11b-0154wp
8
8
8
PASSED AND ADOPTED
following vote, to wit:
this 11th day of April, 1988 by the
AYES: Boardmembers Slater, Shannon, and Winkler
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Boardmember Hirsch
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
~~
/ ~
S. NILES,
Asslstant Planner
LN/CAB11b-0154Wp
ANN SiiANNON, Chairman of the
rdiff-by-the-Sea
ommunity Advisory Board