1988-13
8
RESOLUTION NO.
C-88-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A
DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR PROPERTY OF LOTS 9 AND 10,
BLOCK 65, CARDIFF VILLA TRACT, MAP 1469, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
CITY OF ENCINTAS (COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2030 AND 2034 MANCHESTER)
WHEREAS,
Terry and Tracy Wardell applied for a Design
Review permit
two
for two zero lot line single family dwellings on
lots as per
Chapter 23.08 Design Review, of the City of
Encinitas Zoning
Ordinance;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application
by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board
on April
11, 1988, and all persons desiring to be heard were heard; and
without limitation:
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include
8 a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Site plan submitted by the applicant;
Written information submitted with the application;
Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made
a part of the record at said public hearing;
CAB staff report (88-044-DR) dated April 8, 1988
which is on file in the Department of Planning and
Community Development; and
Additional written documentation.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea
Design
Community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that the
Review permit for two zero lot line single family
dwelling units
on two lots is hereby approved subject to the
following findings:
1.
8
That the proposed project is in conformance with
the intent of Section 23.08.72 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through D;
LN/ln/CABll-601wp
8
8
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
8
2.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of Section 23.08.74 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through J;
3.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of Section 23.08.76 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through G;
4.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of Section 23.08.77 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through D;
5.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of Section 23.08.79 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through F;
6.
The project design does preserve significant public
views to the extent possible, and offers mitigation
for lost views. Public views are defined as those
views provided from public property;
7.
The project takes advantage of views and/or protects,
to the extent possible, some of the significant view
enjoyed by the residents of nearby properties;
That the projection out of the interim envelope does
not significantly impact the views of adjacent
properties, in that the project takes advantage of
views while maintaining some of the significant views
enjoyed by residents of nearby properties;
That the project is compatible in structural size
(bulk and mass) to adjacent properties and
neighborhood;
There is reasonable probability that the land use and
design proposed will be consistent with the General
Plan proposal being considered or studied;
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed design is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan; and
The proposed design complies with all
applicable requirements of state law and
ordinances.
other
local
LN/ln/CABll-601wp
8
approved
C.
D.
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED,
that the Design Review Permit is
with the following conditions:
A.
The project is approved as submitted and shall not be
altered without Community Advisory Board review and
approval.
B.
Prior to the Cïty Building Department issuing a
final inspection on framing, the applicant shall
provide a survey from a civil engineer as to the
building height.
The applicant shall submit for staff review and
approval changes to the side elevations at the ground
level windows, and front elevation window changes to
the north unit, and with addition of a tree to the
rear elevation.
That a covenant shall be executed and recorded by
Terry and Tracy Wardell agreeing to plant the
landscaping approved and dated February 4, 1988 and
agreeing to maintain the landscaping at a height not
to exceed the height of the building.
PASSED AND ADOPTED
this 11th day of April, 1988 by the
following vote, to wit:
8 Boardmembers
AYES:
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Hirsch, Winkler, Shannon and Slater
ANN SiiANNON, Chairman of the
rdiff-by-the-Sea
ommunity Advisory Board
ATTEST:
fìi£);¡.ó:, ~2}¡d
A S. NILES, /
Assistant Planner.
8
LN/ln/CAB11-601Wp