1988-06A
8
.
81
RESOLUTION NO. C-88-006A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A
DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR PROPERTY OF LOTS 47 AND 48,
BLOCK 13, MAP 1298, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
CITY OF ENCINTAS (COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2305 OXFORD)
WHEREAS, Bianco/Addison, Inc. applied for a Design Review
permit
for one single family dwelling on two
lots as per
Chapter 23.08 Design Review, of the city of Encinitas Zoning
Ordinance;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on the application
by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea community Advisory Board
on March
14, 1988, and all persons desiring to be heard were heard; and
WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include
without limitation:
a.
8 b.
c.
d.
e.
site plan submitted by the applicant;
written information submitted with the application;
Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made
a part of the record at said public hearing;
CAB staff report (87-183-DR) dated March 9, 1988
which is on file in the Department of Planning and
Community Development; and
Additional written documentation.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-sea
Community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that the
Design
Review permit for one single family dwelling unit
on
two lots is hereby approved subject to the following findings:
8
1.
That the proposed proj ect is in conformance with
the intent of Section 23.08.72 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through D;
2.
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.74 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through J;
LN/ln/CAB7-456
.r
with the following conditions:
The project is approved as submitted and shall not be
altered without Community Advisory Board review and
approval. Approval is for the structure not to exceed 12' above
the crown of the alley and the City Engineer shall approve the
slope of the driveway.
LN/ln/CAB7-456
3.
8
4.
5.
6.
7.
s.
8
9.
approved
A.
8
.
81
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.0S.76 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through G;
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of section 23.08.77 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through D;
That the proposed project is in conformance with the
intent of Section 23.0S.79 of the Design Review
Ordinance, since the project is consistent with
subsections A through F;
The project design does preserve significant public
views to the extent possible, and offers mitigation
for lost views. Public views are defined as those
views provided from public property;
The project takes advantage of views and/or protects,
to the extent possible, some of the significant view
enjoyed by the residents of nearby properties;
That the projection out of the interim envelope does
not significantly impact the views of adjacent
properties, in that the proj ect takes advantage of
views while maintaining some of the significant views
enjoyed by residents of nearby properties;
That the project is compatible in structural size
(bulk and mass) to adjacent properties and
neighborhood;
10.
There is reasonable probability that the land use and
design proposed will be consistent with the General
Plan proposal being considered or studied;
11.
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future adopted
General Plan if the proposed design is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan; and
12.
The proposed design complies with all
applicable requirements of state law and
ordinances.
other
local
BE IT ALSO RESOLVED,
that the Design Review Permit is
8
8
8
I
\
The applicant shall submit an application for Lot
Merger, and the map shall be recorded prior to final
occupancy of the dwelling unit.
B.
Prior to the City Building Department issuing a final
inspection on framing, the applicant shall provide a
survey from a civil engineer as to the building
height.
A covenant shall be recorded agreeing to maintain the landscaping
at a height no higher than the building.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of March, 1988 by the
C.
D.
following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
MacManus, Hirsch, Shannon, Slater
None
Winkler
None
5ø'~
DA S. NILES,
Assistant Plann
LN/ln/CAB7-456
Q~~Q-~,~
RICHARD MAC MANUS, Chairman of the
Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community
Advisory Board
-