Loading...
1987-28 8 8 8 RESOLUTION NO. C-87-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR PROPERTY OF LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 57, OF CARDIFF itA", MAP 1334, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO (COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2112 CAMBRIDGE AVENUE, CARDIFF) WHEREAS, Carole Badt applied for a Design Review permit for addition per single to family dwelling unit an a as Chapter 23.08 Design Review, of the City of Encinitas Zoning Ordinance; WHEREAS, public hearings were conducted on the application by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board on October 26, and November 23, 1987, and all persons desiring to be heard were heard; and WHEREAS, evidence was submitted and considered to include without limitation: a. site plan submitted by the applicant; written information submitted with the application; Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made a part of the record at said public hearing; CAB staff reports (87-066-DR) dated October 22, and November 17, 1987, which are on file in the Department of Planning and Community Development; and Additional written documentation. b. c. d. e. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that the Design Review permit for an addition to a single family dwelling unit is hereby subject approved to the following findings: LN/CAB11b-0152wp .......I 8 8 7. 8. 8 1. That the proposed proj ect is in conformance with Section 23.08.72 of the Design Review Ordinance, since the project is consistent with the existing and proposed general plan and is an allowed use in the RV-11 zone; 2. That the proposed project is in conformance with Section 23.08.74 of the Design Review Ordinance, since the project design is proposed to match the existing dwelling unit and does not expand the footprint of the building; 3. That the proposed project is in conformance with section 23.08.76 of the Design Review Ordinance, since the project design is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and is of a similar scale and bulk as other proj ects being constructed since there are other two story structures in the vicinity; 4. That the proposed project is in conformance withSection 23.08.77 of the Design Review Ordinance, since the project is not proposing to delete any of the existing landscaping; 5. The project design does preserve significant public views to the extent possible, and offers mitigation for lost views, since the structure is wi thin the interim development height limit off of the street and efforts have been made to mitigate some of the view loss by deleting a balcony off of the front of the project; Public views are those views provided from public property; The project takes advantage of views and/or protects, to the extent possible, some of the significant view enjoyed by the residents of nearby properties, since it is proposed to be within the interim height limit and the remodel is proposed to match the existing dwelling unit; That the projection out of the interim envelope does not significantly impact the views of adjacent properties, in that the proj ect takes advantage of views while maintaining some of the significant views enjoyed by residents of nearby properties; LN/CAB11b-0152Wp 8 8 8 9. 10. 11. 12. That the project is compatible in structural size (bulk and mass) to adjacent properties and neighborhood since it is proposed to be comparable to existing structures in the neighborhood, since there are existing two story structures in the neighborhood; There is reasonable probability that the land use and design proposed will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered or studied; There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted General Plan if the proposed design is ultimately inconsistent with the plan since it is a use that is proposed to be allowed; and The proposed design complies with all applicable requirements of state law and ordinances. other local approved BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that the Design Review Permit is A. B. C. D. E. with the following conditions: The project is approved as submitted and shall not be altered without Community Advisory Board review and approval. That the additional 519 square foot addition remain a part of the main dwelling and never be converted to a rental unit. That the solar panels be relocated to the lowest portion of the roof where they can still be functional and be within the interim height limit. That the front deck be deleted from the proposed addition. The applicant record a covenant agreeing to maintain the landscaping at a height no higher than the height of the building. LN/CAB11b-0152wp J 8 8 8 PASSED AND ADOPTED the following vote, to wit: this 23rd day of November, 1987 by AYES: Hirsch, Mac Manus, and Shannon NAYS: Winkler ABSENT: Slater ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: ~~s~ Assistant Planner LN/CAB11b-0152Wp Q~,,"- Q. ~ .~ RICHARD MAC MANUS, Chairman of the Cardiff-by-the-Sea Community Advisory Board -