Loading...
1990-19 . . . NOŒ: AfI'~c.L. VÞ\IEO o,J AffEÞ-L -F. LEO &'1 fZANc.tto ~þ..Jí'" FE Assoc. 8'1 C"ï CO'-'ÑCtl. Mþ.;~CH 1-D, I~" RESOLUTION NO. OL-90-19 A RESOLUTION OF OLIVENHAIN COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP EXTENSION (90-104-TPM/EXT; FOR TPM 18962) FOR PROPERTY OF A PORTION OF LOT 19, RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, MAP 848, ALSO BEING PORTIONS OF LOTS 81 AND 81A, COLONY OLIVENHAIN, MAP 326, TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF "B" AND "C" AND 13TH STREETS ALL WITHIN SECTION 7, T13S, R3W, SBM WHEREAS, Dennis Hauswirth, submitted a Tentative Parcel Map Extension application required by City the as of Encinitas Subdivision Ordinance, for the purpose of extending the expiration period for a Tentative Parcel Map subdividing one 2.77 acre site into four lots of .5, .5, .81, and .5 acres respectively; and WHEREAS, public hearings were conducted by the Olivenhain Community Advisory Board on July 17, and September 4,1990, and set a public hearing for reconsideration on October 16, 1990, as required by law, and all persons desiring to be heard were heard. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Olivenhain Community Advisory Board of City the Encinitas, of that the proposed Tentative Parcel Map Extension for property being a portion of Lot 19, Rancho Las Encinitas, Map 848, also being portions of Lots 81 and 81a, Colony Olivenhain, Map 326, together with portions of "B" and "c" and 13th Streets all within Section 7, T13S, R3W, SBM, is hereby approved, and may exceed midrange density based upon the following findings: a. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in the Subdivision Map Act, since the map proposes a 4 lot Ln/CAB18-222Wp . . . f. subdivision meeting City standards. The Circulation Element identifies a regional connecting road (SA 680) to be located across this subdivision, eliminating 2 of the 4 lots. The map is conditioned to notify the County of the approval to allow the County opportunity to protect the regional access. The map does not prohibit the implementation of the Circulation Element, maintaining consistency with the General Plan. b. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans, since the 4 lot subdivision meets the City standards in the Rural Residential Zone of 2 dwelling units per acre. The General Plan identifies the Circulation Element road (SA 680) crossing the property. Implementation of the Circulation Element would not be a reasonable condition to be born by the applicant. The map is conditionally approved to place the County on notice of action. The design is consistent with the General Plan. c. That the site is physically suitable for that type of development, in that the four parcels are proposed to be developed in single family dwelling units which is consistent. with the RR-2 zoning designation and development standards for the site. d. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, since the topography and design of the lots can be adequately accommodated as proposed. e. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, and a Negative Declaration was certified for the Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 18962) on November 23, 1987 by the City of Encinitas, and is on file in the Department of Planning and Community Development. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, since documentation has been obtained stating that utilities shall be available for the site, and that the subject site is annexed into the Cardiff Sanitation District. Ln/CAB18-222wp ~ . . . k. I. g. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. h. The environmentally constrained lands are adequately protected since there are no significant environmental features of the site. i. The applicant's understanding of the processing procedures of the map has been complicated by changes in some processing standards, engineering staff, requirements that require separate improvement plans, requirements for cash or letter of credit to be submitted prior to map recordation, or the requirement for improvements to be completed p~or to final map recordation. j. The map was originally approved by three members of the present City Council. The application was not unnecessarily delayed by the applicant. Delays in processing were brought about due to the applicantls need to expend budgeted dollars on litigation against alleged illegal grading on the site. There is no need to alter the design of the map or add conditions, since the map is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood in density and lot area. It was determined not to be consistent with the surrounding area to ask for additional benefits to the City for .5 of a lot in order to grant the extension of the previously approved map that is consistent with the neighborhood. Ln/CAB18-222Wp . . . NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Tentative Parcel Map Extension 90-104-TPM/EXT (for TPM 18962) is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of October, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Boardmembers Trujillo, Perkins, Johnson, and Wiegand Nays: None Absent: Boardmember DuVivier Abstain: None KEVIN JOHNSON, Vice-Chairman of the Olivenhain Community Advisory Board ATTEST: Linda S. Niles Associate Planner Ln/CAB18-222wp .J