1991-09-17
/,
City of
Encinitas
OLIVENHAIN COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD
Regular Meeting Agenda and Action Minutes
PLACE OF MEETING: CIT~ COUNCIL CHAMBERS
535 Encinitas Boulevard, suite 100
Encinitas, CA 92024
PLANNING DEPT. (619) 944-5060
Tuesday, September 17, 1991 - 7:00 P.M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Community Advisory Board Members Present:
Chuck DuVivier, Bryan Schafer, Gregory Post, Paul Van Slyke,
Steve Perkins
community Advisory Board Members Absent:
None
.
staff Members Present:
Linda Niles, Associate Planner
Jay Olivas, Planning Technician
Greg Shields, Public Works Representative
2.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
4.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
5.
CLOSING AND ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Items on the Consent Calendar are matters previously reviewed
by the Community Advisory Board or administrative items which
generally are not public hearing items. Staff has placed some
items on consent due to the minor nature of the request.
8
There will be discussion only if an item is removed from the
Consent Calendar. Items removed by a "Request to Speak" form
submitted from the public will be handled immediately
following adoption of the Consent Calendar. Items removed by
a Community Advisory Board Member will be handled at the end
of the agenda.
A.
Approval of Minutes from meeting (s)
1991.
of:
September 3 ,
JO/04/CAB26-3085wp51 (10-4-91/5)5
527 Encinitas Boulevard, Encinitas, California 92024 TEL 619-944-5050 / FAX 619-632-9836
@ recycled paper
8
8
8
7.
Motion:
Board Member Post - To accept and adopt the Consent
Calendar.
Second:
Board Member Perkins
vote:
Ayes - Duvivier, Schafer, Post, Perkins
Nays - None
Absent - Van slyke
Abstain - None
Board Member Van slyke arrived at 7:05 p.m.
6.
PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUED
None
Board Member Perkins stepped down from Item 7A (potential
conflict of interest)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A.
CASE NUMBER:
91-128 DR
APPLICANT:
Barratt American
LOCATION:
Lone Jack Road and Lone Hill Lane
DESCRIPTION:
Design Review for facilities in a lot
sales program to include a sales trailer,
entry bridge, gatehouse, parking lot,
grading, landscaping, and lighting. RR
Zoning (.26-.5 DU/AC). (continued from
the meeting of September 3, 1991)
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
Exempt per CEQA Section 15303,e
Motion: Board Member Post - To continue this item to the
meeting of November 5,1991 and for the following issues to be
addressed:
Reducing the proposed lighting plan and considering the
possible use of timers or sensors.
The need for more detailed landscaping plans for pin
pointing.
The Bridge design and the use of natural Olivenhain
rocks.
The overall design of the sales trailer with earthtone
stucco colors.
The location of the monument sign and its design and
height.
Adequate access for a semi-truck to the O'Brian property
to pass through the entrance area of the project.
JO/04/CAB26-3085wp51 (10-4-91/5)6
8
The proposed name of the development - "Knightsbridge."
(its appropriateness)
staff returning with the previous approvals of the
project for review by the Board Members.
Verification and approval of all property owners with
access rights over Lone Hill Lane.
Second:
Board Member Schafer
Vote:
Ayes - DuVivier, Schafer, Post, Van Slyke
Nays - None
Absent - Perkins
Abstain - None
Board Member Perkins returned to the meeting after the vote
was taken.
B.
CASE NUMBER:
91-139 TPM/EIA
APPLICANT:
Hodges
LOCATION:
2896 Lone Jack Road
DESCRIPTION:s
Tentative Parcel Map proposed for 3 lots
in the RR-2 Zone.
8
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:
Recommended Negative Declaration
(Negative Declaration approved for
grading for one lot, on the site on
November 14, 1990, Case No. 90-221 EIA)
Motion: Board Member Schafer - To continue this item to the
meeting of October 8, 1991 and for the following issues to be
addressed:
8
Provide a drainage study that will address the existing
major drainage problem across the subject property
through the valley on site coming from the north. The
concern is that this is where the two conceptual pad
sites are shown.
Provide a more detailed grading plan to show that pads
can be accomplished to City standards, the percentage of
slope of the driveways, that there won't be more than 10'
of fill for either pad, and show that the grading would
not impose unnecessarily on the steep slopes of the site.
Provide comments from the applicant's soils engineer
regarding the neighbor's concerns of unstable soils,
especially whether building on the slopes on site will
cause slipping for the houses to the north, and any
comments on the drainage issue.
Calculations of possible development encroachment into
over 25% slopes need to be submitted for review.
JO/04/CAB26-3085wp51 (10-4-91/5)7
8
8
.
10.
Additionally, calculations on the average slope of the
site is needed.
with the above information submitted, the Board wanted to
again review the design of the project for determination
of whether thé three lots can be adequately accommodated
on site.
with the above information submitted, the Board wanted to
again discuss whether the Initial study on the grading
for the development of parcels 1 and 2 should be
accomplished now, or should be attached as a condition of
the lots for accomplishment when those lots are proposed
for development.
Ver i fy that Eng ineer ing and F ire can approve a 20'
improvement on the private road.
Second:
Board Member Post
Vote:
Ayes - DuVivier, Schafer, Post, Van slyke, Perkins
Nays - None
Absent - None
Abstain - None
8.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR BY COMMUNITY ADVISORY
BOARD
9.
COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD/PLANNER REPORTS
Informational Items - No action to be taken.
BUSINESS
BOARD DISCUSSION ON COMMUNITY CHARACTER IN OLIVENHAIN AS IT
RELATES TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Key Comments of Discussion
Board Member Perkins:
Importance of character that's tied to Olivenhain and its
native resources. .
Use of natural colors in design that are like the
surrounding natural landscape.
Use of subtle things such as the position of homes for
solar effects and walls for protection of wildlife at
development sites.
The misuse of architectural features that were originally
for functional purposes. The need for designs that are
honest.
Board Member Post:
Difficult to define the total character of Olivenhain.
Feels that the ,Board is doing a good job by consensus for
decisions on projects.
JO/04/CAB26-3085wp51 (10-4-91/5)8
8
8
8
The Board is serving its purpose and approving nothing
out of the ordinary.
Cannot mandate a design and character on projects.
Board Member DuVivier:
Feels Board is not to decide design criteria
projects.
Feels that pole houses should not be discouraged.
for
11.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion:
Board Member Post - To adjourn at 9:35 P.M. to the
next regularly scheduled meeting of this community
Advisory Board to be held October 8, 1991.
Second:
Board Member DuVivier
Vote:
Ayes - Duvivier, Schafer, Post, Van Slyke, Perkins
Nays - None
Absent - None
Abstain - None
A proponent or protestant of record may appeal a final decision of
the hearing body by filing the appeal within fifteen (15) calendar
days after the hearing through the Office of the City Clerk, City
of Encinitas, 527 Encinitas Boulevard, Encinitas, CA 92024.
JO/04/CAB26-3085wp51 (10-4-91/5)9