1992-18
8'
.
.
/l?;\'7!ol¡-1{2-<;",
, " -'-
RESOLUTION NO. OL-92-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE
OLIVENHAIN COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD
APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT TO ALLOW
THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINE SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCES WITHIN THE "STRATFORD ESTATES"
SUBDIVISION LOCATED WEST OF LONE JACK ROAD
AND SOUTH OF CRYSTAL RIDGE ROAD ON SANTA VISTA COURT
(CASE NUMBER 92-032 DR)
WHEREAS, a request for consideration of a Design Review Permit
was filed by Robert Childers to allow for the construction of nine
(9) single family residences in conjunction with an approved Major
Use Permit for a Planned Residential Development (Case #88-209) per
Planning commission Resolution No. PC-89-15 for property located on
the west side of Lone Jack Road, south of crystal Ridge Road, and
legally described as;
That portion of Lot 18 of the Subdivision of the RANCHO LAS
ENCINITAS, in the City of Encini tas, County of San Diego,
State of California according to Map thereof No. 848, filed in
the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, June
27,1898, more particularly described in Document # 89-468074
recorded on August 3, 1989.
WHEREAS, a public hearing for the application was held on
May 5, 1992 and was continued without discussion to the hearing
conducted by the Olivenhain community Advisory Board on June 2,
1992; and
WHEREAS, the Olivenhain Community Advisory Board considered,
without limitation:
1.
2.
The agenda reports dated April 29 and May 27, 1992;
The General Plan, Zoning Code and associated Land Use
Maps;
Oral evidence submitted at the hearing by staff, by the
applicant and by the public;
written evidence submitted with the application and at
the public hearing; and
The application, plans and supporting material dated
received by the City on March 4, 1992. Said plans
consisting of 3 sheets of (1) the plot plan, (2) noise
attenuation wall details, and (3) address markers and
mailbox kiosk. The design plans consisting of 11 sheets
indicating the floor plans for Plan Types 1,2 and 3 and
the elevation plans for Plan Types 1, 2A, 2B, and 3.
3.
4.
5.
WHEREAS, the Olivenhain Community Advisory Board made the
following findings pursuant to Chapter 30.16.010B 7b of the
..
Encinitas Municipal (Zoning) Code:
(SEE ATTACHMENT" A" )
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Olivenhain community
Advisory Board of the City of Encinitas that application 92-032 DR
is hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
(1)
(2)
(3)
.
(4)
(5)
(6)
.
The project is approved as submitted and evidenced by
plans dated received by the City on March 4, 1992 and
shall not be altered without City approval or as
conditioned herein.
This approval may be appealed to the Planning commission
within 15 calendar days from the date of this approval in
accordance with Chapter 1.12 of the Municipal Code.
This Design Review approval shall be valid for two years
from the effective date of the permit (to June 2, 1994),
during which time construction of the approved
structure(s) shall be pursued in conformance with the
Uniform Building Code to the satisfaction of the Director
of Planning and Community Development; or an extension of
time is granted pursuant to the Municipal Code for the
permit.
A licensed surveyor shall verify the height of the two
story structures at the time of framing inspection to
certify that the height does not exceed the height
measurements specified on the approved plans.
As set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. PC-89-
15, all conditions for the original Subdivision Map shall
be complied with. For new residential dwelling unites),
the applicant shall pay development fees at the
established rate. Such fees may include, but shall not
be limited to: Permit and Plan Checking Fees, School
Fees, Water and Sewer Service Fees, Traffic Fees,
Drainage Fees, Affordable Housing in-lieu Fees and Park
Fees. Arrangements shall be made to the satisfaction of
the appropriate department or agency to pay the impact
fees prior to Building Permit issuance or Final Occupancy
approval.
Prior to Building permi t issuance, a plan shall be
submitted for approval by the Director of Community
Development and the Encinitas Fire Protection District
regarding the treatment of the site during the
construction phase, the circulation and parking of
construction workers' vehicles and any heavy equipment
needed for the construction of the proj ect, and the
mitigation of potential impacts the construction may pose
to surrounding residents.
(7)
.
.
.
All required landscape plantings shall be in place prior
to use or occupancy of new buildings or structures. All
required plantings and automated irrigation systems shall
be maintained in good growing and working condition and,
whenever necessary, shall be replaced with new plant
materials or irrigation parts to ensure continued
compliance with applicable landscaping, buffering, and
screening requirements. All landscaping and irrigation
systems shall be maintained in a manner that will not
depreciate adjacent property values and otherwise
adversely affect adjacent properties.
(8)
FIRE PREVENTION DISTRICT:
A.
Access Roadways: The clear and unobstructed paved
width of a fire access roadway shall not be less
than twenty-four (24) feet. EXCEPTION: A roadway
providing access to a single family residence shall
not be less than sixteen (16) feet in paved width.
B.
Building identification and/or addresses shall be
placed on all new and existing buildings so as to
be plainly visible from the street or access road;
color of identification and/or addresses shall
contrast with their background color. The height
of numbers shall conform to Fire District
standards. Where structures are located off a
roadway on long driveways, a monument shall be
placed at the entrance where the driveway
intersects the main roadway. Permanent address
numbers shall be displayed on this monument.
C.
Prior to delivery of combustible building materials
on site, water and sewer systems shall
satisfactorily pass all required tests and be
connected to the public water and sewer systems.
In addition, the first lift of asphalt paving shall
be in place to provide a permanent all weather
access for emergency vehicles. Said access shall
be maintained to the satisfaction of the Fire
District.
D.
OBSTRUCTIONS: All traffic lanes shall be a
minimum of twenty-four (24) feet wide and shall be
maintained free and clear of obstructions at all
times during construction in accordance with Fire
Prevention District Policy. Emergency access
roadways, when required, shall be posted per
District standards.
E.
FIRE HYDRANTS AND FLOWS: Submit a letter from the
Encinitas Fire Prevention District to the Community
Development Department stating the District's
satisfaction with the type, number and location of
fire hydrants. A letter from the water agency
serving the area shall be provided to the District
which states that the required fire flow is
available. provisions shall be made to ensure a
maximum water pressure at the hydrant does not
exceed 250 psi. A pressure reducing station will
-=
.
.
be required for pressures in excess of 250 psi.
Fire hydrants shall be of a bronze type and shall
be identified by the installation of a blue two-
sided reflective road marker pursuant to Fire
Prevention District standards.
F.
structures shall be protected by automatic fire
sprinkler systems. sprinkler systems shall be
installed to the satisfaction of the Encinitas Fire
Prevention District.
G.
Prior to Building Permit issuance, the applicant
shall submit to the Community Development
Department a letter from the Fire Prevention
District stating that all development impact, plan
check and/or cost recovery fees have been paid or
secured to the satisfaction of the District.
H.
RESPONSE MAPS: Any development which necessitates
by virtue of new structures, fire hydrants,
roadways or similar features, shall be required to
provide a map in a format compatible with current
department mapping services, and shall be charged a
reasonable fee for updating all response maps.
(9)
All conditions of Major Use Permit #88-209 shall be
complied with for the Planned Residential Development as
required by Planning commission Resolution No. PC-89-15.
(10) The access roadway shall be designed and constructed to
be wide enough to allow a vehicle to stop at the
community mail box without blocking other vehicles on the
access roadway.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Olivenhain Community Advisory
Board of the City of Encinitas that:
A Negative Declaration was adopted for this project on April
25, 1989 in conformance with CEQA Guidelines and Mitigations were
made a part of the Final Map and Grading requirements for the
project.
..
.
.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
following vote, to wit:
2nd day
of June,
1992,
by the
AYES:
Mazanec, Van Slyke, Schafer, Bode, Kitnick
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
None
ABSTAIN:
None
ATTEST:
~l? ~ . c,Q~
Craig R. Olson
Assistant Planner
ryan R. Schafer, Chairman of
the Olivenhain community
Advisory Board, City of
Encinitas
.'
ATTACHMENT "A"
Findings for Design Review Approval
per section 23.08.072 of the Municipal Code
1)
The project design is consistent with the General Plan,
a Specific Plan and the provisions of the Municipal Code.
Facts: The subject property was approved for subdivision and
has a Major Use Permit for a Planned Residential Development
and the Design Review request is consistent with those
approvals.
Discussion: Staff can not identify any aspect of the
submi tted proj ect which does not comply with Zoning Code
standards, General Plan Policies or the requirements of the
Major Use Permit for the Planned Residential Development.
Conclusion: The Olivenhain community Advisory Board finds,
therefore, that the design of the proj ect conforms to the
policies and standards of the General Plan, zoning Ordinance,
Municipal Code, and the provisions of the Planned Residential
Development.
2)
The project design is substantially consistent with the
Design Review Guidelines.
.
Facts: The project design provides structures which conform
to the site design layout of the approved subdivision map, the
building designs provide architectural accents and relief and
the homes are situated to provide privacy and security.
Discussion: The project design is consistent with the intent
of the Design Guidelines in that buildings and landscaping are
well planned to take advantage of the site without intruding
on the privacy of neighboring property.
Conclusion: The Board finds that the project design is
consistent with the intent of the Design Review Guidelines.
3)
The project design will not adversely affect the health,
safety, or general welfare of the community.
Facts: The project design is consistent with new homes being
built within the community.
Discussion: Staff can find no evidence to indicate that the
project design would adversely affect the health, safety, or
general welfare of the community.
Conclusion: The Olivenhain Board finds that the project
design will not adversely affect the health, safety or general
welfare of the Olivenhain Community.
.
4)
The proj ect will not tend to cause the surrounding
neighborhood to depreciate materially in appearance or
value.
.
Facts: The project design tends to be compatible with the
style of single family residences constructed within the
neighborhood.
Discussion: staff can find no evidence to indicate that the
project would materially depreciate the appearance or value of
the neighborhood.
Conclusion: The Olivenhain Board finds that the project will
not adversely depreciate the appearance or value of the
immediate neighborhood or the Olivenhain Community.
.
.