Loading...
1988-08 8 8 . RESOLUTION NO. OL-88-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE OLIVENHAIN COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM SECTIONS 4810 SETBACKS, AND 4006 & 4200 LOT SIZE OR AREA, OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3703 MANCHESTER AVENUE WHEREAS, Louis V. Schooler applied for a Variance from sections 4810, 4006 and 4200 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a reduction in lot size below the required .50 minimum net acres required in the RS-2 zone for Parcel 1 from .582 gross acres to .459 net acres, and for Parcel 2 from .585 gross acres to .482 net and for reduction in the required 40' from acres; a centerline front yard setback from a less than 40' easement to 23' on Parcel 2 for property of: All that portion of the West half of the East Half of the South Half of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of section 24, Township 13 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, County of San Diego, State of California, according to official plat thereof, lying Southerly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 320.00 feet Northerly from the Northerly line of County Road Survey No. 426, (Manchester Avenue) 40.00 feet wide, a plat of which is on file in the Office of the County Engineer of San Diego County. EXCEPT therefrom the East 5.095 feet thereof. . Commonly known as 3703 Manchester Avenue, Encinitas; WHEREAS, public hearing was conducted on the a application 1988, by the Olivenhain 88-274-V on October 18, Community Advisory Board, at which time all persons desiring to be heard vlere heard; and LN/ln/CAB11a-1058wp 8 WHEREAS, evidence was submi tted and considered to include without limitation: c. site plan submitted by the applicant; written information submitted with the application; Oral testimony from staff, applicant, and public made a part of the record at said public hearing; CAB staff report (88-274-V) dated October 13, 1988, which is on file in the Department of Planning and community Development; and Additional written documentation. a. b. d. e. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Olivenhain Community Advisory Board of the city of Encinitas that: 1. The applicant I s property is physically special in contrast to some of the existing lots in the vicinity, since one of the parcels proposed is enclosed on three sides by either public or private roads or easements requiring greater setbacks for structures, and the access easement running east and west through Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 which resulted in the reduction of the lot sizes for both parcels was requested by the County of San Diego to relieve a potentially hazardous access onto Manchester Avenue from the adjacent easterly property; 8 2. The privilege sought by the applicant is consistent with the limitation upon other properties in the vicinity and zone, since other properties in the vicinity do not have streets or easements on three sides of the property and therefore, may have less restrictive setbacks; 3. The granting of this Variance would not authorize a use that is not expressly authorized by the zoning regulations, since the existing triplex on Parcel 2 is an existing non-conforming use and structural non-conformity and a covenant is required to be recorded agreeing to convert the existing triplex to a single family dwelling unit prior to issuance of a building permit to construct a single family dwelling unit on Parcel 1, thereby ensuring that the existing non-conforming situation is only allowed to remain until a building permit is requested on Parcel 1, at which time only one single family dwelling unit will be allowed on each parcel; . . LN/ln/CAB11a-1058wp 8 4. The granting of this variance would not grant a privilege not enjoyed by other property in the vicinity, since other properties do not have roads or easements on three sides of the property; the situation was not self-induced since the County's request for the access easement east and west through Parcels 1 and 2 resulted in the reduction in net lot size; the request would not constitute a rezoning, since the lots would be only slightly below the required .50 net acre lot size; and would not authorize a public nuisance, since the lots are ultimately proposed for single family residential use. BE IT FURTHER ~SOLVED THAT the application for Variance 88-274-V is hereby APPROVED with the following condition: 1. A covenant is required to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder, binding to present and future owners, agreeing to convert the existing triplex on Parcel 2 to a single family dwelling unit prior to issuance of a building permit for Parcell. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of October 1988, by the following vote, to wit: 8 AYES: Boardmembers Bobbitt, DuVivier, Fernald and Stumpf NAYS: None ABSENT: Boardmember Tutoli ABSTAIN: None CHUCK DU VIVIER, Vice-Chairman of the Olivenhain Community Advisory Board ATTEST: . LN/ln/CAB11a-1058wp