Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1990-119809
90 119809 843 OF e A Ric Ds� SAN DIEGO COUNTY fF 5Att OIC6 ! COINTY.C? LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION 90HAR �6 AM10* 55 VERA L. LYLE Please return to "Robert R. Hall Annexation" to COUNTY RECDROER� . LAFCO @ MS A216 the Cardiff Sanitation District Ref . No DA89=2 NO FEE Pursuant to Government Code Sections 57200 and 57201 , this Certificate is hereby issued , The name of each city and/or -district involved in this change of organization/ reorganization , all located within San Diego county , and the type of change of organization ordered for each such city and/or district is as follows : City or District Tyne of Charge of Organization Cardiff Sanitation District Annexation . i A certified copy of the resolution/ordinance ordering this change of organi- zation/reorganization without an election , or the resolution/ordinance con- firming an order for this change of organization/reorganization after con- firmation by the voters is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein . i A legal description and map of the boundaries of the above-cited change of organization/reorganization is included in said resolution _ The terms and conditions , if any , of the change of organization/reorganiza- tion are indicated on the attached form . I hereby certify that I have examined the above- cited resolution/ordinance for a change of organization/reorganization , and have found that document to be in compliance with the Commission ' s resolution approving said change of organization/reorganization . I further certify that ( 1 ) resolutions agreeing to accept a negotiated ex- change of property . tax revenues for this jurisdictional change , adopted by the local agencies included in the negotiations , have been submitted to this office , or ( 2 ) a master property tax exchange agreement pertinent to this jurisdictional change is on file . Date February 28 , 1990 J P , MERRILL Executive Officer . F 4 844 1600 l �® 1600 Pacific Highway • Room 452 L11 San Diego, CA 92101 • (619) 531-5400 San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission Chairperson P8tlhmy Bran P. CERTIFICATE RE: TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND INDEBTEDNESS Brian Counry Board of super.isors Subject: "Robert R. Hall Annexation" to the Cardiff Sanitation District Members (Ref. No. DA89-2) Marjorie Hersom Alpine Fire Certain terms and conditions are required b the Local Agency Formation Protection District 9 Y g Y Dr. Charles W. Hostler Commission to be fulfilled prior to the completion of the above-named change Public Member of organization. Mark J. Loscher Vice Mayor City of San Man:os I �� ' f' 0"A1N56` John MacDonald County Board of (Name) (Title) Supervisms Stanley A. Mahr do hereby certify that the terms and conditions listed below have been fully San Marcos county met. Water District Fred Nagel 1 . The boundaries shall be modified to conform to Exhibit A attached Mayon City of U Mesa hereto. Abbeilmembeimcr 2 Payment b the owner of district annexation fees and State Board of ' Councilmemher. city of Y y San Diego Equalization charges. Alternate Members Mike Gotch Public Member �j Bruce Henderson Councilmember. City of San Diego Gayle McCandliss Councilwoman. City of Chula Vista John Sasso Ptendcm, Horrego Water District ( Leon L. Williams Will the affected property be taxed for any existing bonded indebtedness or County Boanl of contractual obligation? Supervisor Yes _ No X If yes, specify. Executive Officer Jane P. Merrill Counsel � �-- Lloyd M. Harmon, Jr. .Signature C2.A a Date } > ; =�.ar 845 l RESOLUTION NO . 89-07 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS j OF THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT li ANNEXING TERRITORY TO WHICH OWNERS HAVE CONSENTED p ROBERT HALL ANNEXATION WHEREAS , pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ( Govt . Code , Section 5600 et seq . ) preliminary proceedings were commenced by resolution of application i by this Board on December 14 , 1988 , as Resolution 88-38 , for annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District (thereinafter r referred _ -ta as._ the District) of certain territory therein described , which description has been modified pursuant to the directions of the Local Agency Formation Commission ; and i WHEREAS , the annexation proposed by said resolution of application was presented to and approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Diego County on March 8 , 1989 , and this District was designated as the conducting district and authorized by resolution to order said annexation without notice or hearing and without an election pursuant to Government Code , Section 56837 ; NOW, THEREFORE , IT IS RESOLVED , ORDERED AND DETERMINED , pursuant to Government Code Section 57025 et seq . ; a . The manner in which and by whom preliminary proceedings were commenced was by resolution of application by this Board as stated above . b . The territory to be annexed has been designated DA 89-2 by the Local Agency Formation Commission , and the exterior boundaries of such territory are as hereinafter described . C , The territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited , and will be benefited by such annexation as described in Health and Safety Code Section 4830 , TH/ 03/CR02-272wp5 1 ( 4 -3 -89 ) Book # ' Page V`. YY � o 846 d . The reasons for the proposed annexation as set forth in the resolution of application referred to above are : i 1 . The District is empowered to and is engaged in furnishing sewage disposal facilities . 2 . The territory proposed to be annexed to said District is developed and/or proposed to be developed and used for residential and/or commercial purposes and provision for sewage disposal facilities for said territory is essential for such purposes . e . The terms and conditions of the proposed annexation are : Payment of annexation and State Board fees . f . All the owners of land within such territory have given their written consent to such annexation , as provided in Government Code , Section 56837 ; and therefore , as approved and authorized by the Local Agency Formation Commission , this Board may adopt its resolution ordering the annexation without notice and hearing and without an election , as provided in Government Code , Section 57002 . g . The regular County assessment role will be utilized and the affected territory will be taxed for existing bonded indebtedness . h . Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15074 ( California Environmental Quality Act of 1970) , the Board finds that this project would not have a significant effect on the environment . I IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that pursuant to Government Code Section 57002 , the following described incorporated territory in the City of Encinitas , State of California , be and it hereby is annexed- to and made a part of the Cardiff Sanitation District , IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Board immediately transmit a certified copy of this resolution along with a remittance to cover the fees required by the Government Code Section 54902 . 5 to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency TH/03/CRO2 -272wp5 2 ( 4 -3 -89 ) Book y ' Page �/- 3 �T• j 847 Formation Commission of San Diego County , so that the Executive l Officer may make the filings required by Chapter 8 ( commencing with / Section 57200 ) , Part 5 , Division 1 , Title 6 of the Government Code and by Chapter 8 ( commencing with Section 54300 ) , Part 1 , Division 2 , Title 5 of the Government Code , PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of April , 1989 , by the following vote , to wit : AYES : Gaines , Hano , Omsted , Shea, Slater NAYS : None ABSENT : None ABSTAIN *None `Pamela Slater , Chairman of the Board Cardiff Sanitation District ATTEST : ` E . J POOL, Clerk of the Board 19 E. Jane Pool, Clerk of the Board of Directors of the Cardiff Sanitation District of Endinitas, California do hereby certify under . penalty, of perjury that the above and foregoing 'is.. a true and correct copy of this document on file - In my office. In witness whereof - i have sot; my hand and the Seal of the Cardiff Sanitation' District. O�`J 3 eay of �v�• 79� E. J Pool, Clerk of the Board TH/ 03/CR02 -272wp5 3 ( 4-3 -89 ) S Rook N ^aeF t I 1 , 848 'Robert R. Hall Annexation" to the Cardiff Sanitation District DA89-2 All that portion of Section 22, Township 13 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to United States Government survey, lying within the following described boundaries: Beginning at the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 22; 1. Thence north 0 038'35" east along the westerly line of said northwest quarter of the northeast quarter 778.00 feet; 2. Thence north 89 059'10" east 109.87 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of State Highway XI-SD-2A (Highway 5), map on file in the Office of the State Division of Highways of said County; 3. Thence south 36°10'09" east, 224.06 feet; r 4. Thence south 29 039'58' east, 400.03 feet; S 5. Thence south 33 057'02" east, 401.53 feet; f. 6. Thence south 37 028950" east, 172.79 feet; f 7. Thence south 0°02'20" east, 115.84 feet; 8. Thence south 89 018'30" west, 572.24 feet; 9. Thence north 0°38'35" east, 336.85 feet; 10. Thence north 89°57'33" west along the southerly line of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 22, 208.00 feet to the point of beginning. Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 A"r9W by the comm of Son Dim MAR - 6 09 ih : cg LAFCO 3/7/89 IN N I� .. .', SBA- • �p ,e 23(ae ) 64 0 V49 © (( 0.9eAC c` O u :.SSMC 5. 6Y�C. I u• 1 .77AC '° W . M 4K ou l it NBf-/G 'E ! Z dBS. 7C e •W sRf•ro•w vv 317. 00 ° O 1.03AC w P0. 32e.7! J'iYY.CGR .OF O 20e ip. a NWl4 � f•/c•w NE 1%4 aF ' •COAC SEC- 22 4 ^yi Mg. �6 J q s Y .VB9-/B'30'E 780. Z4 1r/' 200`4 w O ° >- V /}B / G u T " 543 e v 37 c v c .56.0 = . Approved bYibeLmlAPMFOmaft Ya v COmmWbn of son Diem x MAR - 61989 ge�*lc 5EC 22 -T 135 -A1114/ PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT �/P.OBE,eT /P, yALL A/VNEXR T/O/1/ /' ( 260-181-64) Area 10 , 94 AC Existing Boundary :Ax>LasRXwQ- Proposed Annexation mmmmmmwmwmm .7JA89 2 r . RESOLUTION NO. 89-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT ANNEXING TERRITORY TO WHICH OWNERS HAVE CONSENTED ROBERT HALL ANNEXATION WHEREAS , pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (Govt. Code, Section 5600 et seq. ) preliminary proceedings were commenced by resolution of application by this Board on December 14 , 1988 , as Resolution 88-38 , for annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District (thereinafter referred to as the District) of certain territory therein described, which description has been modified pursuant to the directions of the Local Agency Formation Commission; and WHEREAS, the annexation proposed by said resolution of application was presented to and approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Diego County on March 8 , 1989, and this District was designated as the conducting district and authorized by resolution to order said annexation without notice or hearing and without an election pursuant to Government Code, Section 56837 ; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, ORDERED AND DETERMINED, pursuant to Government Code Section 57025 et seq. ; a. The manner in which and by whom preliminary proceedings Were commenced was by resolution of application by this Board as stated above. b. The territory to be annexed has been designated DA 89-2 by the Local Agency Formation Commission, and the exterior boundaries of such territory are as hereinafter described. C. The territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited, and will be benefited by such annexation as described in Health and Safety Code Section 4830. TH/03/CR02-272wp5 1 (4-3-89) Formation Commission of San Diego County, so that the Executive Officer may make the filings required by Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 57200) , Part 5, Division 1, Title 6 of the Government Code and by Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 54900) , Part 1, Division 2 , Title 5 of the Government Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of April, 1989 , by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Gaines, Hano, Omsted, Shea, Slater NAYS : None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN:None Pamela Slater, Chairman of the Board Cardiff Sanitation District ATTEST: E. JANE POOL, Clerk of the Board TH/03/CRO2-272wp5 3 (4-3-89) O "Robert R. Hall Annexation" to the Cardiff Sanitation District DA89-2 All that portion of Section 22, Township 13 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Encinitas, County of San Diego, State of California, according to United States Government survey, lying within the following described boundaries: Beginning at the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 22; 1. Thence north 0°38'35" east along the westerly line of said northwest quarter of the northeast quarter 778.00 feet; 2. Thence north 89°59'10" east 109.87 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of State Highway XI-SD-2A (Highway 5), map on file in the Office of the State Division of Highways of said County; 3. Thence south 36°10'09" east, 224.06 feet; 4. Thence south 29°39'58" east, 400.03 feet; 5. Thence south 33°57'02" east, 401.53 feet; 6. Thence south 37°28'50" east, 172.79 feet; 7. Thence south 0°02'20" east, 115.84 feet; 8. Thence south 89 018'30" west, 572.24 feet; 9. Thence north 0°38'35" east, 336.85 feet; 10. Thence north 89°57'33" west along the southerly line of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 22, 208.00 feet to the point of beginning. Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 Approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Diego MAR - 6 1989 e tiva Lh :cg LAFCO 3/7/ 9 SeGQ�Q�gq�.�ivvvvvvvv o 3(" 64 �1 QAC " OUT • rryr. s 57•�o"w � � � � 1.7 7 A C 72. / fn o 74 a -•W � n / 1.01AC o M ;'t v 1.03AC - O NW 1/4 OF o /c w NE 1/4 of '.BOAC ° SEC.22 ° %% L � $F.1 ` �..... ..., .wnvrMnN^✓`F�4� ::/isS•:,v+.w.,^vtdEKivw!A:.l-.C�. �Z v .+iB9°/B 30'E 780.Zd W ^� +� •` _ _ SAS `- 11.g3AC y O 69 O S65 W W %AC z o Approved by fhe Local Agency Formation y Commission of San Diego o v oq . x MAR - 6 1989 ?E.cutNe C d Co Ln SEC Z Z -7-/.35-,R f PROPOSED ANNIEXATION TO THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT r (260-181-64) Area 10.94 AC E x i s t i n9 Boundary Proposed Annexation IV Alk I I..I'101.V \1 'I 11 ',_.1.tiZ\�l.I 1�1;-.,..� ��..►l 1 �`� �' _ .-�• \ , - .. .u•a I I \1.✓_��� I _._._.-.--�.'-__-"'I .�''Jtr, y^ I _ 11�-t" •' '• 1 ,1 u.i•.11.� _, _l f' - \ ` i i �T.T�_�2w T--� ?�, r•"`' '\^',l� '1 i � � t. � i III-"�--•�L--^Ir-'---1 � '' I rte•-�-• �\� '1'�� '_.�.__--. i._.__-�_-_-_. _>• �It�,r•,� nt 't,'1 l�_'r ���'-'.—.j•-';1-.,-4� � .i` IL.-." I�I _I I � I r-- J ------•-- �1..,- .y'•.- ,:,r�y.�ti7z�.__.-.�-- "r— I I �,� .—r� :�Irl�- `'_' i�---- +! •` _ r �`' II •� r-•�_ = -, � -v r'..l r-ter-•+ _ ,��-.i �i• 'a-' ---1 I �•..�,.t:J •- �•_-�"� ` t'. .--( _'1„x._1 � .��_�`'�\ \ ,1'I I� _._.'1:���..eV ..-+ i ..— „ ___. -'_- -_ 1 - �tt•,• •'• _ 1 `l �C`.: —___ '_.��-;ilG:-.L;.�I,C� \ \ _ ` I( 1 ----- .— ----��-I;__ ^-�_T=_II —�Al •• ,•t V� 1 .r��` 111L�L C}.f' �-ii..ar - I •`\ �` I l__--_-I�._y.. .—__ --- I .- __.t•_____—�'y- T TAL ^`I ,�+2 •'1•\n.-•1+a3`u 1 1'' tI� \ —F_—� .�1 ' .. .... I"-_�_...�—_ _. —_I-'.... "-^ ti` ^��`. '. ,._— �= ,=. - �- Lam` �-�._��--r;-•.•'_._--.;_�• •...J;,�__ II'---��.-_;�=--'_ _� _ �� .,Project '— �� r_ I .n - i 11i. .I f •J _ L o C Cam. 1 0 n � LF r-' =tom t-r, >,-�-�i'�-.�j.---. -_�':-----i I I �^- �`• •� .i \ �'i•.1r,� I;�-- :. r-1 '-- � ::. �a'�-�:'.-x-,t.--,.Ei�a-�.6if-'.--�- r-� r:r'_'.:�. 0 500 1000 ( 't};Llrr� P:Ircc 011 1 ?,, �'1 i Minute Item: 4 Ref. No.: DA89-2 RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DfEGO MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE "ROBERT R. HALL ANNEXATION" TO THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT On motion of Commissioner Hostler, seconded by Commissioner Mahr, the following resolution is adopted: WHEREAS, a resolution of application was submitted to this Commission for annexation of territory to the Cardiff Sanitation District, which resolution was adopted by the Board of Directors of said District as Resolution No. 88-38, dated December 14, 1988, pursuant to Title 5, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed for annexation is as described in the application on file with the Local Agency Formation Commission; and WHEREAS, the Executive Officer of the Commission has filed her report on said annexation, which report was received and considered by the Commission; and WHEREAS, all owners of land have consented in writing to the annexation; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Commission hereby finds, determines, and orders as follows: (1) The Commission certifies that it has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration prepared by the City of Encinitas. (2) The Commission hereby approves the annexation with modified boundaries, as described in Exhibit A attached hereto, subject to the following condition: Payment by the property owner of district annexation fees and State Board of Equalization charges. certain.(3) The boundaries of the territory as described in Exhibit A are definite and (4) The boundaries of the territory do conform to lines of assessment and ownership. (5) The district is a registered-voter district. (6) The territory includes 10.94 acres and is uninhabited. (7) The territory proposed for annexation is hereby designated the "Robert R. Hall Annexation" to the Cardiff Sanitation District. (8) The Commission hereby designates the Cardiff Sanitation District as the conducting authority and authorizes the Board of Directors to initiate proceedings in compliance with this resolution without notice and hearing. (9) The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and directed to mail certified copies of this resolution as provided in Section 56853 of the Government Code. - 2 - I i i a I i Passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Diego this 6th day of March 1989 by the following vote : AYES : Commissioners Loscher, Nagel , Wolfsheimer, Mahr, Hostler, and Sasso NOES : None ABSENT: Commissioners Bilbray, MacDonald, and Hersom ABSTAINING: None ------------------------------------------ STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) SS i I , JANE P. MERRILL, Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation. Com- mission of the County of San Diego, State of California, hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy with the original resolution adopted by said Commission at its regular meeting on March 6 , 1989 which original resolution is now on file in my office; and that same contains a full , true, and correct transcript therefrom and of the whole thereof. Witness my hand this 8th day of March 1989 JAV P. MERRILL Executive officer San Diego County. Local :-Agoncy Formation Commission 1 INITIAL STUDY Hall Parcel Case No. 88-213 Annexation r PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project is an annexation of a 10.94 acre Hall parcel to the Cardiff Sanitation District. Project liquid waste disposal improvements will include a single restrccm within an existing agricultural storage building, a 1000 gallon septic tank, holding tank, one-half horsepower electric pump, 700 feet of two to three inch diameter pressure line, and connection to an existing eight inch sewer line stub. PROJECT LOCATION The Hall parcel is located at 425 Santa Fe Drive between Interstate 5 and Rubenstein Avenue behind the Santa Fe Plaza shopping center in the community of Cardiff-By-The-Sea (see Figure 1 ). - - ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The Hall parcel is used for growing cut flowers and potted plants in greenhouses. There is also an agricultural storage building with salesroom and office on the site. This parcel is designated 4 Residential (2.9 DU/AC) on the City General Plan (San Dieguito Community Plan). It is classified R-S-3. Land to the north supports a commercial shopping center known as Santa Fe Plaza. Interstate 5 (I-5) lies immediately to the east. Property to the south and west is used for greenhouse agriculture. The commercial land to the north is designated 13 General Commercial on the City General Plan (San Dieguito Community Plan) and classified C-36. I-5 is designated 22 Public/Semi-public and classified S-94. Property to the south and west is designated 4 Residential (2.9 DU/AC) and classified R-S-3. POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS No potential significant effects have been identified. MITIGATION MEASURES No mitigation measures are necessary. RECOMMENDATIONS Research and review of project improvements, Environmental Information Form, supplemental materials, site, surroundings, and Environmental Checklist Form have failed to disclose any environmental issues. On the basis of this initial evaluation the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be prepared. I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Hall Parcel / Case No. 88-213 Annexation II. Environmental Impacts Explanations of "Yes" and "Maybe" Answers 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: f. Other governmental services? The Hall parcel ownership has applied for annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District to dispose of liquid waste generated by a restroom in an agricultural storage building at the site. III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation Narrative Description of Environmental Impacts 14. Public Services (r. ) . Annexation of the Hall parcel to the Cardiff Sanitation District is necessary to provide for disposal of liquid waste generated by the restroom facility at the site. The City has required this facility to be installed in the previously approved agricultural storage structure on the parcel as a condition of its building permit (87-112). Seepage pit testing of the parcel and adjacent property under the same ownership and use by Robert Prater Associates (1988) has revealed that, due to shallow groundwater conditions, disposal in seepage pits is unfeasible. The restroom will contain two flush toilets, one urinal , and two lavatory sinks. It will be used only during working hours by 10 to 12 employees. Bathing, cooking, or laundry use will not be allowed. A drainline from the building will connect to a 1000 gallon septic tank adjacent to its westerly side. Fluid waste will then drain to a holding tank for lifting by a one-half horsepower electrical pump through approximately 700 feet of two to three inch diameter pressure line. The line will run north and west across adjacent private property under the same ownership to a connection with an existing eight inch diameter stub from a line in an easement on the adjacent commercially used property. The proposed waste disposal improvements are intended solely for service to the site and are sized to only support the restroom. The parcel is abuts the District boundary on the north and is within its sphere of influence. Adjacent unsewered property over which the line will cross is under the same ownership (Hall ) and is devoted entirely to greenhouse use. Connection to the existing line will not require its extension. Although annexation would remove that particular obstacle to future development of the subject parcel for other than agricultural use, it in itself will not foster such development. Conversion of the site to some other use would be subject to the City General Plan land use designation for the site as well as other applicable General Plan elements, development polices, zoning, and other regulations in affect at the time. Approval of this annexation is dependent on the District abilities to transmit and treat the generated waste. Any future development at the site would also be dependent on the ability of the District to provide transmission and treatment at that time. HALL/IS CITY OF ENCINITAS DETERMINATION BASED ON INITIAL STUDY HALL PARCEL CASE N0. 88-213 ANNEXATION Name or Project 425 SANTA FE DRIVE, CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA Location Entity or Person Undertaking Project: ROBERT HALL Name 425 SANTA FE DRIVE, ENCINITAS, CA 92024 Address Staff Determination The City o Encinitas staff, having undertaken and completed an Initial Stu';' of this project in accordance with the City' s CEQA Guidelines for the purposz- of determining whether the proposed project might have a significant effec- on the environment, has reached the following conclusion: x I . The project could not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a Negative Declaration will be prepared. 2. The project could not have a significant effect on the environment, due to mitigation measures accepted by the applicant which include: therefore, a Negative Declaration will be prepared. 3 . The project could have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared. � a Q g� 4yy4f; Encinitas D to 8/8 7 Y TO: Board of Directors * Cardiff Sanitation District * The undersigned property owners" in the vicinity of 425 Santa Fe Drive City of Encinitas respectfully request in the and consent to the commencement of proceeding for the annexation of the property * described opposite our names to the Cardiff Sanitation District * and further consent to this annexation subject to any and all regulations, - fees, and/or charges established under the provisions of existing Cardiff Sanitation District ordinances. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED State Lot, Block, Subdivision's name Please sign and Map No. or Section, Township and ASSESSOR'S DATE NAME AND ADDRESS Range or Address of Property.* PARCEL NO. * Por . W 1 /2 of NE 1 /4 260- 181 -64 Robert R Hall -- 425 Santa Fe Drive of Sec . 22-Ti35 R4W Encinitas , CA 92024 T i t SIGNATURE: DATE: *If property is in escrow, please note the approximate date of completion of escrow. Please return petition to: County of San Diego DEPAR`ib1E:NT Oi: PURLIC 101ZKS 5555 Overlanu? ,wenue - Building 1 San Diegc , ::ali;ornia 92123 Attn: Steve 5eit,ert 0384 Phone 694-36.16 * Date 8 /8 /88 Name Robert R. Hall Address 425 Santa Fe Drive Encinitas , CA 92024 * As the proponent(s) for this annexation of property identified as 260- 18 1 -64 to the Assessor s Parcel Number s Cardiff SanitationDistrict, I understand and agree that annexing into the District does not guarantee sewer service or commit sewer capacity to the subject property being annexed. Also, the District by accepting the application does not represent that it will provide any treatment plant expansions or sewer line extension to provide capacity or service for the subject area to be annexed. Acceptance of this application and final annexation of the property only allows the property to be served at such time as the owner(s) of the annexed property pay all necessary costs for the sewerage facilities which can transport, treat and dispose of the wastewater generated by the property. This may mean the proponent(s) shall pay for a part or all of the required facilities to serve the property. Signature of Annexation Applicant Robert R. Hall 2/2-012 • i *ARDIFF SANITATION DISTRIS AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: April 11, 1989 TO*?.. ,, -?Tom Warren H. Shafer, District Manager FR Henie, Utilities Planner , y/ VIA: Morton F. August, District Engineer 's V Robert A. Warren, City Engineer DATE: April 6, 1989 SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 89-07, Annexing to the Cardiff Sanitation District of 10. 94 Acres Located at 425 Santa Fe Drive Between Interstate 5 and Rubenstein Avenue - Robert Hall BACKGROUND: At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Cardiff Sanitation District on October 271 1988, the Board approved a connection agreement with Robert Hall to provide sewer service to a existing agricultural building. Due to shallow groundwater conditions, disposal in seepage pits was unfeasible. On December 14 , 1988, annexation procedures were started with adoption by the Board of a resolution of application (88-38) to annex the above mentioned 10.94 acres to the district. DISCUSSION: On March 6, 1989, the Local Agency Formation Commission adopted Resolution D.A. 89-2 approving the application for annexation into the Cardiff Sanitation District. The parcel is located at 425 Santa Fe Drive between Interstate 5 and Rubenstein Avenue (see attached vicinity and plat maps) . This annexation is necessary to serve a single restroom within an existing agricultural storage building. The on-site sewer line has been sized to serve only this one facility. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors: 1. Find pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15074 (California Environmental Quality Control Act of 1970) , that this project would not have an effect on the environment (Negative Declaration Log No. 88-198) . 2 . Adopt Resolution No. 89-07 annexing parcel to the district. th/02/cm4-1499wp5 1 (4-6-89/1) City of v Encinitas December 29, 1988 Local Agency Formation Commission 1600 Pacific Highway San Diego, CA 92101 Dear LAFCO Members: Subject: Annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District Petition of: Robert R. Hall Notice is hereby given of intention to annex territory to the Cardiff Sanitation District. The annexation is proposed under the provisions of the of the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act - Section 56000 et seq. , Government Code. Please find the following items enclosed: 1. LAFCO processing fee. 2. Original LAFCO questionnaire/application. 3 . A certified resolution of application. 4 . Property owner consent form. 5. A legal description (Exhibit A] . 6. A reproducible map and (10) prints of the specific boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed. 7. Two (2) copies of a general vicinity map. 8. Environmental Impact Document. Notice, process and other communications regarding said annexation may be directed to the proponents at: City of Encinitas Dept. of Public Works 527 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA. , 92024 Attn: Tom Henie Sincerely, je�En-- Tom Henie Utilities Planner 52- 1?11011rtas BOnikc:u-d,SuitC U)0. Encinitas, California 9202.1 H - M FLOWERS, INC. 16841 425 SANTA FE DRIVE ENCINITAS, CA 92024 90-491222 19 PAY TO THE I $ ORDER OF DOLLARS CALIFORNIA ENCINITAS OFFICE 200 D Skeet a EnCkNtos.Cpptp,nIG 92024 FIRST BANK FOR use 1684 111' 12 2 2004901:0 2 1 149887811' RESOLUTION NO. 88-38 RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY Robert R Hall Annexation No. 8853 . 0 WHEREAS , this Board of Directors has received a request from Robert R Hall that the hereinafter described territory to be annexed to the Cardiff Sanitation District (hereinafter referred to as the Sanitation District) ; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to initiate proceedings to annex said territory to the Sanitation District; BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED as follows : 1 . Pursuant to Government Code Sections 56800 and 56700 , application is hereby made to the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Diego for a proposed change of organization as follows : A. This proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reoraanization Act ef . S . 6G^0 et. sq. : t- C uue ) . B . The nature of the proposed change of organization and the names of all districts for which any such change of organization is proposed as follows : The annexation of the hereinafter described territory to the Sanitation District . C . The names of all other affected counties , cities and districts are : City of Encinitas . D . A description of the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed to the Sanitation District is described in Exhibit "A" hereto attached. E. Said territory is uninhabited and comprises approximately 10 . 94 acres . F . It is proposed that said territory be annexed subject to the following condition: Payment of district annexation and State Board fees . G. All the owners of land within such territory have given their written consent to such annexation subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions . H. The reasons for this proposal are as follows : ( 1 ) The Sanitation District is empowered to and is engaged in furnishing sewerage disposal facilities . ( 2 ) The territory proposed to be annexed to said District is proposed to be developed and used for residential and/or commercial purposes and provision for sewerage disposal facilities for said territory is essential for such purposes . I . It is hereby requested that proceedings be taken for the annexation of territory as hereinabove proposed. J . This annexation is consistent with the sphere of influence of the Sanitation District . 2 . Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 ( California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 ) , the Board finds that this annexation is not subject to the environmental impact evaluation process because it is categorically exempt as a project initiated for the purpose of making sewer service available to new construction or conversion of small structures . T;ie :.L eik of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Diego. PASSED and ADOPTED this 14th day of December 1988 , by the following vote , to wit: AYES : Gaines, Hano, omsted, Shea, Slater NAYS : None ABSENT: None Chairman of the Cardiff Sanitation District ATTEST: I, E.JAi z OOL, Clerk of tho Board of Dircctr. of the Cardiff Sanitation District,.Encinitas, California do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Is a true and correct copy of the E . JAN POOL, Clerk o f the Boa d original of this document on file in my office. In witness whereof 1 have set my hand and the seal loofthe Cardiff Sanitation District this Oc- iQ f day of u' p _._—_-- 19 nd Clerk of the Board TO: Board of Direce i * Cardiff Sanitation District * The undersigned property owners* in the vicinity of 425 Santa Fe Drive city of Encinita in the " -" respectfully request and consent to the commencement of proceeding for the annexation of the property * described opposite our names to the Card if f Sanitation District * and further consent to this annexation subject to any and all regulations, -fees, and/or charges established under the provisions of existing Cardiff Sanitation District ordinances. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED State Lot, Block, Subdivision's name Please sign and Map No. or Section, Township and ASSESSOR'S DATE NAME AND ADDRESS Range or Address of Property.* PARCEL NO. * Robert R Hall Por . W 1 /2 of NE 1 /4 260- 181 -64 425 Santa Fe Drive of Sec . 22-T135 R4W Encinitas , CA 92024 T1 E ✓ DATE: SIGNATURE: *If property is in escrow, please note the approximate date of completion of escrow. Please return petition to: City of Encinitas 527 Encinitas , Blvd Ercinitas , Ca : 92024 Att. Tom Henie Phone # 944-5079 PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT Petition of Brian F. Mooney Associates All that unincorporated territory in the County of San Diego, State of Cali- fornia being a portion of Section 22, Township 13 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian and lying within the following described boundary: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22. 1. Thence North 0 038'35" East along the Westerly line of said Northwest Quarter of Northeast Quarter 778 feet; 2. thence North 89°59' 10" East 109.87 feet to the West Right-of-Way line of Highway 5 (X1-SD-2A); 3. thence South 36 010'09" East 224.06 feet; 4. thence South 29 039'58" East 400.03 feet; 5. thence South 33°57'02" East 401.53 feet; 6. thence South 37 028' 50" East 172.79 feet; 7. thence South 0°02'20" East 115.84 feet; 8. thence South 89 018'30" West 572.24 feet; 9. thence North 0°38'35" East 336.85 feet; 10. thence North 89 057'33" West along Southerly line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22, 208 feet to the point of beginning. EXHIBIT "A" 3/10-009mas 586° c 2 3(n.r) 64 0 41 .o 72 'SQA. 0.94AC ��" O u T :.55AC $S$��� .a. _.o 1.77AC NB9�%G'E b 1.01AC SRS•%G w NO 1.03rAC .°, •j3••w G/G.52 - 200 /C4.i! 32e.7, IW.(:OR.o O r 63 9•iC'w NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 0 0 V � o W 1 - � niB9°iB'3oaE 7Bo,z¢ r N��55 11.g3AC o +68 69 o s. !v n W O C 0 .56AC y v a h O �9 • X ,SEC 2 2 -r/,36 -54W PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT Petition of Brian F. Mooney Associates (260-181-64) Area 10.94 AC Existing Boundary LwlsjjLLUjL Proposed Annexation A rs stt MAP t P _WA c§t_Y s o' a[vMr[ F Sr_.._:EEVws' EEN w . sfOOVA 2 1 /INNL xgrio�v -� tea. � � I TO GARDIFr 5.0, I 2 I I 1 c 3 DUf I• `pfa,lN / I ,• t-- 2 _ Pt 1 v�.y _ y lh•hc4 .P � •NO z P' l Q PO sT LA NfvASCII aN o\ -------- s as a i I E OLIVENHAIN_ ..._ OLIVENHAIN RU 1 2 I �r R A N i C O Iy A CL p F W ---_% --- T—� ` �` e ^ ANESS• •�\ r.-• CIfN \ _�Iaph Oh t� T Qua / 1 1 °05'° 3 s 'vaaEfu z EGM +Irlaar r'� ! hi Botanical iiGardens l J�_�t� L--� EaoN P •Ys�}C PO E+P " fOP°lOK ST-- T>�,y, �f P IIaP S lt•rsvooD p was O O - z i Y ;u sf• �" v°uE Pun' r Arpl.Nr• n _. 4 d• I y I y X •n NP a vmT, P✓Mn v.aJsH� O f"AFO T#• I•s,[ w EIOwFP s � M'1EGAND wr a � [f'���EP"o+`�E a h � �$ 4 I �r•� oPACO« sT + "'r ° �Zx aI i 4° JPP sPO�oraN > crsn rPfk a«$ tea,[+Mrr�3 "!o` - / Ew• N P w ro lf!�btq F9 TPAS•E f i 'r 0 I ..f .vEN PO —I� Ca iP•Vf yr W° POPJ vC, • OV� V Y ———— '�... ° �r .`Or!�Pr'th P a 'E,flpp���� IwNIS•Eh rN S MrEMr• 4 ° J' �+ U 41-7 1 IM if IN r[a^i[I WIN. 4� 0 8 ys ! E afaPANCn BLVD z ��s.•DOW " G "f �..... I i 1 •yf1•o id cP z [vr .w n I• w,h J °u ■JR MS 1 IQUEZA ST - d` `i"_ - s[ r �•.t i ;N I Ew R w—urvlEw off •vEN1 15 0 3 SA° .o-m oR crosT DP E�� 3 4 o " sM AaEf[A M ! 4 TPEE a �� < oPES P"E 4 I oG 4� s pwl•D i u 'Nlpr L r•r -° luf° 8 I AO •y�rh"�' Pr 'rte t PpuAO•wM. oP I � e " TPE%w"Al M rfv o :•nsr 9sf I ,�,� s,« Enc tas z - S' rM av `rl�st • I [P�•s G r+osatal ¢ N,ll o : —\ F �P n 1[Nros \ Oil Z IvS s rfP o Q y� g 1 a ! a[ o cul[ e 7 y m O .bh ML P° DF 5°S �n DR n«EM•Ntn pP E 11• b[ls•s E� FA AV Nt•CPW- WLMUTGP[EP M [j1[W C ° wluow WEVrE' wo MUNfvM S ;CT f h \ \ ^ G \ I °o•FN GtNr " I`.�i"cF O --_ >NY�f T`MOP Mac' o I 8f y l • �n•clPNOOp 1 � M OC[MCPf 51lNPD• p r011P11 M � ra''TELM GPEINa•• � OP � «nNP.1l o+ : � I ^PI •U wOoDCUPf f M _ \ Ir• OSSCT,• " _ I LL l S GSia[ DP a 1 ,y Q+ • sr No.a o Y 9 24 > S S I r�� m O •acoN °ewn+1• L t sfl; i z «•u tr vn vc i Z �y •va` auP sn P[ w i r rJffov A.v i P t r _ — ntSN•S Av —q - F — r „GRAM ? R —a+Pyrlanu.—M � �—— ——— ———— _ . CITY OF ENCINITAS DETERMINATION BASED ON INITIAL STUDY HALL PARCEL CASE NO. 88-213 ANNE:{ATIO'� Name o ^ Project 425 SANTA FE DRIVE, CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA Location Entity or Person Undertaking Project: ROBERT HALL Name 425 SANTA FE DRIVE, ENCINITAS, CA 92024 Address Staff Determination The City of Encinitas staff, having undertaken and comp i eted an I-:i al of this Droject in accordance with the City' s CEQA Guidelines for the pur�c_� y I Lt r .. Ill i 11 1 I I� 0�1E.. ... L the environment, has reached the following conclusion: x 1 . The project could not have a significant effect on the Environment ; therefore, a Negative Declaration will be prepared . 2. The project could not have a significant effect on the envircr.mnent, due to mitigation measures accepted by the applicant which include : therefore, a Negative Declaration will be prepared. 3 . The project could have a significant effect on the environment ; therefore, an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared . Date City o; Encinitas 8/87 INITIAL STUDY Hall Parcel Case No. 88- 213 Annexation PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project is an annexation of a 10. 94 acre Hall parcel to the Cardiff Sanitation District. Project liquid waste disposal improvements will include a single restrocm within an existing agricultural storage building, a 1000 gallon septic tank, holding tank, one-half horsepower electric pump, 700 feet of two to three inch diameter pressure line, and connection to an existing eight inch sewer line stub. PROJECT LOCATION The Hall parcel is located at 425 Santa Fe Drive between Interstate 5 and Rubenstein Avenue behind the Santa Fe Plaza shopping center in the community of Cardiff-By-The-Sea (see Figure 1 ) . ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The Hall parcel is used for growing cut flowers and potted plants in greenhouses. There is also an agricultural storage building with salesroom and office on the site. This parcel is designated 4 Residential (2.9 DU/AC) on the City General Plan (San is c�Ui1v tjii,.mUni:.y Picini . i� lb G1c�5i1`�eC `v' Land to the north supports a commercial shopping center known as Santa Fe Plaza. Interstate 5 (I-5) lies immediately to the east. Property to the south and west is used for greenhouse agriculture. The commercial land to the north is designated 13 General Commercial on the City General Plan (San Dieguito Community Plan) and classified C-36. I-5 is designated 22 Public/Semi-public and classified S-94. Property to the south and west is designated 4 Residential (2.9 DU/AC) and classified R-S-3. POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS No potential significant effects have been identified. MITIGATION MEASURES No mitigation measures are necessary. RECOMMENDATIONS Research and review of project improvements, Environmental Information Form, supplemental materials, site, surroundings, and Environmental Checklist Form have failed to disclose any environmental issues. On the basis of this initial evaluation the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be prepared. SAP0E= I . ZT7I rinN11=AL =1r_1L i S; Fop-is (To Be Ccmple:ed By Lead Agency) 1 . Name of Proponent ROBERT HALL 2. Address and Phone Nl=b--r of Proponent 425 SANTA FE DRIVE ENCINITAS, CA 92024 (619)753-2532 3. Date of Checl-.list Submitted 5 JULY 1988 G. Agency Requiring Checklist CITY OF ENCINITAS 5. Narne of Proposal, if applicable HALL PARCEL CASE NO. 88-213 ANNEXATION II . Environmental Irn .cts � p1amations of all "yes" and "II?ybe answers are required on a.tached, sheets.) SEE ATTACHMENT Yes Ir, � I Esc LlhL. h`_ tuE proper l resu L 1T1. a. Uns table earth conditions or in c'nanges in X geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, discla—anents, compaction or X overcovering of the soil? _ c. Cnange in topography or ground s=rface g relief feat_, es? _ d. The destruction, covering or codification R of any urcue geologic or physical features? _ e. Any increase in wrind or Fester erosion of X soils, either on. or off the site? — f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion Maich may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or X any bay, inlet or lake? _ g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, X mudslides, ground failure, or sL-.,ilar h_,ards? • Yes Ma te No 2. Air. Will the proposal result i�^.: a. Substantial air eyissions or deterio ,:.tioa X of ambient air quality? b. ne creation of objectionable odors? X C. citeration of air movement , mois-,=re, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Tat er. Will the proposal result ir.: a. Changes in currents, or the course of di- rectioa of water movements, in either = ine or fresh Raters? X b. (aa nges in absorption ---,,es, drainage 7pat- teras, or the rate and amount of su_rlace X runoff? c. Alte_atio^s to the course or low of flood X d. Change in the amo�,:nt of surface water X any water body? --. -- e. Discharge into surface waters, or in apv alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temp?rature, X .. ---._... dissolved oxygen or turbidity ? _ f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flo.: X of ground waters? _ g. C ,:-ge in the a amity of grouad waters, either tl=ugh direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h.. Substantial reduction in the a=unt o-F water otherwise available for public . _ water suoolies? X i. Expos•,:re of people or property to water re- lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X 4. • Plant Life. Will the proposal resalt. in: _ a. C-,P-nge in the diversity of species, or n=- .bar of any species of plants (including- trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aaua�ic plants)? X Yes No b. Reduction of the nurbers of any unique, rare X or end.=gered species of plants? — C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a 'wrier to the no=I repienist- X men t of existing skies? — d. Reduction in acreage of any 3-gricultu_-7al crop? 5. An'_--1 Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversi-y of series, o: n, 'tars of any species of ani Ts (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- h fish, bent:zic o 6anis7as or insects)? — b. Re ductioa of the nl=bers of any unique, X rise or endgered series of aails? an — C. Introduction C.I. new species of ani=ls into an are-, or result in a 'barrier to the r^igra- x - tion or tovenent of ani-Mls? — d. Deterioration to existing fisa or 7ildlife ha_bi tat? — x a. Increases in e:isting noise levels? — x b. Exposure of p�ople' to. severe noise levels? — 7. Light and Glaze. rill the proposal produce new light or glare? S. Land Use. gill the proposal result in a. sub- stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an ?-re--? X g. h _t:z al Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase. in the rate of use of any natural X resources? 10. Fisk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of haze rdous subs t�aaces (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, cheer Gals or ra-diztion) in the event of an accident or h upset conditions? — 2 940 Yes yav be NO b. Possible interference a�th an ern°-_5enc}' response plaa or an emergency e%,ac•.s.tion t• plan? — 11 . pop:lation. dill the proposal alter tte location dis-,-ibution density, or gro,�;-th rate of the h,---:-, pop.:lation of an arm? — 12. Eo;siag. �`i11 the proposal a_f f ert existing hous- i or create a demand for aaditiona'_ housing? — 13 . T rs-po:-tatioa/Circulation. gill the - roposal result in: a. Generation of substantia-1 a ditioz... 1 x vehicular movement? — b. Effects on existing pa-rk=a facilities, or x demand for new pa.rl�ng? -- c. Substant'_2.1 irapact u_a;n ex:-sting, trz nsoo ti, Cation Systefrs? — d. niterat lons tO D-esent p-tteras o= C-rClla- t: tion Or movameat of pimple and/Or t. c1.. ..�- +rar f�c ^� -rs to motor _ . Increase in k bicyclists or pedestria;^s? r 14. public Services rii ll the proposal have an e_fec L'Don, or result in a. ripe<1 for new or alterea got' services in ny of tae followLrI'- c-re2S Y Fire Drote^tion? — x b. Police protection? — k c. Schools? — -d. Pa..rks or other recreational facilities? -= e. maintenance of public facilities, including x roads? — X f. Other governmental services? — 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: x l a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy' — j . � Yes hfavbe No b. S�ubstaatial increase in de=nd upon existing sources or ene.by, or remAr e the development X of new _;,=es of e..^.e_by? — lE. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for ne,w systers, or substa^,ia1 alterations to the folloF-inc; utilities: — 17. Hlr7nn Health. Will the proposal result in: a , (`_e:.tioa of any health � rd or potential ?: health. ha:ardu(escluding mental health)? — b. &-cosure of people to potential health X ha�rds? 1S. . Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of a.nv scenic vista or view open to the rublic, or r.-11 the proposz l result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open X to public vies? 19. Re reztion. 'dill the proposal result in an imp Ct upon-the Ct21i ty Or gi:antity Of exiStin- X recreational OD�Or tl:_:pies? — 20. Cultu_r~1 Heso,-,-ces. a. Will the propos l result in the alteration Of Or the destr-uction Of a prehistoric or historic archaeological Site? _ b. Fill the oro_oosal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or X historic building, Structure, or object? — c. Does the oroposal have the potential to cause a physical c:lange which would aff--t unique ethnic cultural values? X d. Will the proposal reszric e-,isting religious or srcred uses w;thin the potenti al impact X . area? — 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially .reduce the habitat of a fish or azldlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or a-mimal c=unity, re- _ duce the n=_I>e_r or rest=is. the range of a raze or endangered p1a_:.t or anirar.l or eliminate . � Yes b'cicbe No -* les of the r� 'or per iods of X i;.po. ,.ant e�p J Califo aia history or prehi stor�'? — b. Does the project have the potent'a'_ to achieve short-te=' , — tage of long-te^, envi=oeatal goals? (A sho.-te W i.upact on the environment is one wl`ct. occ'�.�s in a .e'_a- tively brief , def�.._tive period of tLme -.'.rile long-terra impacts Fill endu, e well into the Y future.) — c. Does the project haze impacts wtich a_re individually limited-4 , but c,=—lat'-rely con- side=,.b1e? (A proj�tY ip� t on two or more separate resources rte_e the impact on each resource is relz.tively small, but where tLe effect of the total of those iL-cts on X the enviro=ent is significant.) — d. Does the pro j e--t have envi ron aental effects w i.ch ,--11- c--use s.bstantial adverse of f e--s X on hil-nn beings,' e-':-- or indirectly'? — I-I. Discussion of ~aviron.^ent-31 =^al�tion (Narrative description o'_ e rv_ron mental i; acts.) Deter--i T t.;— _ (To b- cmapletej by the L,e-^ g =cy.) On the basis of this initia= evaluation: I find thzt the proposed DrojA- + CJ1L.D. NAT have 2 sjgni ri cant effect y � sTIV E DE7LLR-Z— will be- prepared. �) on the envir ormon L, 2a.� a ham..:__ I find that al thougz the pr project could ba.ve a signi:icy*�t effect on the t ere will not be 2 Sl ,---iC2n, effect 1a this case be-c-a se the nitiaation nearsures described on an attached sheet have -beez added to the project. A t���TIVE D�'-"' -D4TI0� FiT_� BE pg � ❑ I `find the proposed project MkY have a si=i ficz*it effect on the environment, and an 'VI?fJ^�? 'T�?, DTACT FL----IO3T is required. ❑ 5 JULY 1988 Date Signature For CITY OF ENCINITAS • -: -(Note: ibis is only a su ested -o Public agencies a-re free to devise their -• -• own for—.—t for initial studies.) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISTOM Hall Parcel Case No. 88-213 Annexation II . Environmental Impacts Explanations of "Yes" and "Maybe" Answers 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a neec for new or altered governmental services in any of the followinc areas: f. Other governmental services? The Hall parcel ownership has applied for annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District to dispose of liquid waste generated by a restroom in an agricultural storage building at the site. III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation Narrative Description of Environmental Impacts 14. Public Services (f. ) . Annexation of the Hall parcel to the Cardiff Sanitation District is _.necpscar'y 'to provide for d+ sPcs,-.l of liquid waste aenerated by t�'.p restroc"r, facility at the site. The City nas requirec tnis Taciiity to be inscaiieu in the previously approved agricultural storage structure on the parcel as a condition of its building permit (87-112) . Seepage pit testing of the parcel and adjacent property under the same ownership and use by Robert Prater Associates (1988) has revealed that, due to shallow groundwater conditions, disposal in seepage pits is unfeasible. The restroom will contain two flush toilets, one urinal , and two lavatory sinks. It will be used only during working hours by 10 to 12 employees. Bathing, cooking, or laundry use will not be allowed. A drainline from the building will connect to a 1000 gallon septic tank adjacent to its westerly side. Fluid waste will then drain to a holding tank for lifting by a one-half horsepower electrical pump through approximately 700 feet of two to three inch diameter pressure line. The line will run north and west across adjacent private property under the same ownership to a connection with an existing eight inch diameter stub from a line in an easement on the adjacent commercially used property. The proposed waste disposal improvements are intended solely for service to the site and are sized to only support the restroom. The parcel is abuts the District boundary on the north and is within its sphere of influence. Adjacent unsewered property over which the line will cross is under the same ownership (Hall) and is devoted entirely to greenhouse use. Connection to the existing line will not require its extension. • • Although annexation would remove that particular obstacle to future development of the subject parcel for other than agricultural use, it in itself will not foster such development. Conversion of the site to some other use would be subject to the City General Plan land use designacicn =or the site as well as other applicable General Plan elements, development polices, zoning, and other regulations in affect at the time. Approval of this annexation is dependent on the District abilities to transmit and treat the generated waste. Any future development at the si _e would also be dependent on the ability of the District to provide transmission and treatment at that time. HALL,. 1-2 VI. PUBLIC CONTACT A. List all agencies, grou*and individuals contacted re � garding this proposal. IVone J, * LAFCO will consider the person signing this application below as the the proposed action(s). •Notice and other communications regarding this application (including fee f payment) will be directed to the proponent. Signature: Date: Print or Type Name: Robert R. Hall Representing: Address: 425 Santa Fe Drive Encini aG A 92024 Phone No. (619) 753-2532 * If you wish anyone other than the proponent of this application to receive notices and reports of these proceedings, please include here: Name: Brian F. Mooney Associates Attn: Russell E. Hunt Address: 9903-B Busin !sspark Avenue San Diego. CA 92131 (619) 578-8964 (7/07/87) 10 V. SPECIAL REVENUES•NNEXING CITY OR DISTRICT OT COMPLETE TNi A• Does the city/district have current plans to establish an S SECTION would include this area, in order to pay for new Y new assessment districts which No or extended services? Please detail. Ei- Does the affected tcrritor million dollars per Y contain existing commercial activities which year or more in retail sales? N--O--_ generate ten C- Will the area assume any existing Please explain, and indicate taxpaer cos bonded indebtedness u Any existing bonded bebt becones the liability 1 i ty of the annexation to city/district? annexation. property owner after D. Will the territory be subject to any new or additional s fees? Please outline, pecia! taxes, benefit charges, or Annual sewer service charge after connection to the public sewers system. m. E. Which service(s) to be provided to the annexin being provided by another local agency? g area by your city/district are presently None (Please list each service and current provider). F. Is the city/district requestin proposal? _ No g an exchange of property tax revenues as the result of this G• Is a master property tax exchange agreement applicable to this _his jurisdictional change? H• If property tax exchange negotiations affected agencies will be of this are necessary, upon receipt of this application all negotiation process. proposal and provided preliminary information to City/District Representative (signature) Title ' T Phone Number 9 F. FLOOD CONTROL 1. Describe the majrainage area within which the e subject territory is located: 2. Are there existing flood control facilities on the territory? If so, describe. 3. If this territory is annexed to a city, has the city planned for improvements to provide for flood control in the area (on or off site)? N/A G. TRANSPORTATION L Designate the names and types of roads which the secondary access project will use for primary and (include direct access streets from the freeway): project site to the nearest Street Name Tvve (Right of Wav Width) Current level of Service N/A 2. Is widening of an existing street necessary? N/A 3. Is the project served by County-maintained roads? NIA 4. Is construction of new access streets necessary? N A - 5. What is the distance to the nearest shopping center? N A miles. 6. Is public transportation available? NIA . How distant? —NIA miles. IV. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE A. Is the territory to be annexed or reorganized located within the sphere of influence of the city/district to which it is proposed to be annexed? Yes B. Will a sphere of influence amendment for any affected agency be required? No Which agcncy(ies)? N/A 8 C. FIRE PROTECTI� 1. Is the territory currently within a fire district or city? Yes a. If so, which one? Encinitas Fire Protection District V, 2. If not, is annexation for fire protection part of this application? N/A 3. Is structural fire protection necessary? N/A 4. Location of nearest fire station: N/A a. Estimated response time: N/A (Priority) NIA (Non-priority) D. POLICE PROTECTION 1. What police agency currently serves this territory? C i t v of Encinitas a. Location of nearest police station? N/A b. Estimated.response time: N/A (Priority) N/A (Non-priority) 2. What police agency would serve this territory if this jurisdictional change is approved?_ N/A a. Location of nearest police station? N/A b. Estimated response time: NIA (Priority) N/A (Non-priority) E. SCHOOLS 1. Will development on the territory generate any school-age children? N How many: o a. Grades K - 6 b. Grades 7 - 9 C. Grades I0 - 12 2. What school district(s) is the subject territory within? - N/A 3.1 Are any elementary or secondary schools serving the subject territory operating above design capacity? N/A If so, which schools? T/a 7 2. Septic System a. Is a septic scn(s) currently used on the c property. _,.. b. Will septic system be used upon annexation and development of the property? No C. If 2.b. is answered yes, please answer the following: (1) Have percolation tests been conducted? N/A (2) Dept. of Public Health approval? _N/A B. WATER SUPPLY 1. Is the subject territory within a district or city that provides water service? Yes a. If so, what district or city? San Die uito Water District 2. Is annexation for water service necessary? No a. If so, what district or city? N/A 3. Is the agency prepared to immediately furnish the necessary service? N/A If not, explain. 4. Is water service currently provided to the territory? Yes a. If so, what is the current water demand? N/A �_ MGD (1) For what purpose? N/A 5. Will the project be connected to an existing water line? N/A a. Distance to tie-in N/A b. When will service be extended to territory? N/A C. The total anticipated water demand will be: (1) Residential use _ N/_ A MGD. (2) Industrial/Commercial use _ N/A MGD. (3) Agricultural use _N/q MGD. 6. Is the subject territory to be annexed to an improvement district? N/A a. If so, which one(s)? 7. Specify any improvements (on and off site) that will be necessary to connect and serve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of these improvements and method of financing (e.g., general Property tax, assessment district, landowner or developer fees). N/A 6 g. Is the sect territory to be annexed to an i 0 vemcnt district? No h. Specify any improvements (on and off site) that will be necessary to connect and serve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of these improvements and method of financing (c.g., general property tax, assessment district, landowner or developer fees). The landowner will pay for all improve ments. A drainline from the building will connect to a 1000 gallon septic tank adjacen to its westerly side. Fluid waste will then drain to a holding tank for lifting by a e half horsepower electrical pump through approximately 700 feet of two to three inch diameter pressure line. The line will run north and west across adjacent private prop- erty under the same ownership to a connection with an existing eight inch diameter stub i. Capacity of Treatment Facility: from a line in an easement on the adjacent commercially used property. (1) What is the physical design capacity of the sewage treatment plant •which will serve the annexation area? NIGD. (2) What is the current average daily sewage treatment volume of wastewater being treated at the plant? MGD. (3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity to service the territory? If not, what plan does the agency have to increase its capacity? j. Capacity of Transmission Lines: (1) What is the physical design capacity of the affected sewer main (trans- mission line or pipeline) which conveys wastewater to the treatment facility? MGD. (2) What is the current loading rate of the sewer main? MGD. (3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity in its sewer main to serve the territory? . If not, what plan does the agency have to increase its capacity? k. Capacity of Outfall Lines: (1) What is the physical design capacity of the affected outfall line which conveys treated effluent to the ocean or ocean outfall system? MGD. (2) What is the current loading rate of the outfall line? MGD. (3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity in the outfall line to serve the territory? If not, what plan does tile: agency have to increase its capacity? 5 3. How is the territory present!y used e. groves; . etc)? Please be ific as to tructures, imp ovements ilities now o single-family property. , Greenhouse an 9 , 700 square foot agricultural property. storage building . * 4. How are adjacent lands use¢? North: retail commercial shopping center - Santa Fe Plaza . East: 1-5 South: agricultural /horticulture Nest: agricultural/horticulture * 5. Does any portion of the subject territory contain any of the following: Agricultural Land Uses Yes Agricultural Preserve No Flood Control Channel No River or Creek Scenic corridor zone No N— ° 1 _ Open Space Easement No�_ 00-year flood line Nom Coastal bluff N Airport noise contour No —° Coastal permit zone -- Archaeological/historical Ye--s--._ features N_=_ Sewer Moratorium area N—°—_ Other unusual features Slopes greater than 25% _N__ (specify) Mature Trees No III. PUBLIC SERVTCES INVENTORY A. SEWAGE DISPOSAL 1. Public Sewer System a. Is the subject territory within a district or city that provides public sewer service? _ No If so, what agency? N/A b. Is annexation for sewer service necessary? Yes (If No, skip to Question # 2 (Septic System) ). If yes, what distr Car*iiff Sanitaion District ict or city? * C. What is the distance for connection to the a enc adiacent t.o existing system g Y(ies) existing sewer system? d. Has the affected agency issued a letter of sewer availability? N/A -If yes, provide a copy of the letter with your application. e. Will the agency be prepared to furnish service immediately? If not, explain. Yes f. Is the territory in a sewer moratorium area? No 4 * 5. In as much ail as possible, please explain wh&is proposal is necessary at this time (e.g., an approved development or an exiS1wS structure requires service not currently provided or available). Agricultural storage building requires restroom if office use is included . Annexation is required for sewage disposal . High ground water table prevents subsurface" sewage disposal . B. GENERAL INFORMATION * 1. Please describe the general location and physical features of the territory which is the subject of this proposal. Refer to major highways, roads, watercourses, 4nd topographical features. Parcel is located south of Santa Fe Drive and west of I-5 in the city of Encinitas . It is level , flat and has been used for greenhouses for many years . * 2. How many acres of territory are included in this proposal? 10 . 94 X * 3. How many people live within the subject territory? 0 x * 4. How many registered voters live within the subject territory? 0 x C. LAND USE INFORMATION o. Zoning or County general plan and zoning information call 565-5981. If subject area is within 9 nfo . 565-5581 a city, call that city's planning department., * 1. County N/A - a. Is the territory within a county community planning area? X If so, which one? b. What is the County General Plan or community planning area designation? X . C. What is the existing County zoning? X * 2. City :ontact .ffected city a. Is the territory within a city general plan area? Yes If so, which city? Encinitas b. What is the city's land-use designation? _Existing : Residential 4-2.9du Proposed : Residential 3-2 du/ C. Has any city zoned or prezoncd the territory? _ Yes If so, which city? Fncini taG d. How is the territory zoned or prezoned? R-S-3 3 be com ted in consultation with city or ct staff and signed off by This application must that contact person. All quest must be answered (use N/A if not licab ) II. DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFIC&T-1 N A. DEVELOPMENT PLANS * 1, Is the subject territory to be developed at this time? No * 2. If yes, generally describe the anticipated development (building types, facilities, number of units). 9 , 700 sq . ft . agricultural storage building is completed and awaiting final inspection subject to sewer service . permits or approvals from a city or the County which Please indicate below all discretionary p royal date. If already granted, + will be needed to complete the project and the proof resolution of approval. please indicate the date of approval and submit copy Agricultural storage building with office and restroom allowed . Is Resolution Project Date of of Approval Attached? Approval File No. Approval City or County Plan Amendment N A Prezoning (City) -- N/A Rezone (County) -- Tentative Subdivision Map N /A Tentative Parcel Map ��--- -- Major Use Permit -�— -- Other -- � 3. If no development is planned at this time, will approval of the proposed jurisdic- tional change increase the development potential of the property? N/A (If so, please indicate in terms of allowable uses, and number of units.) 4. If development is not planned at this time, when is development of the area antici- pated? N/A 2 Date �f g Local Agency Formation fission • 1600 Pacific Highway, Ro 452 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 531-5400 CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION/REORGANIZATION APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE I. This questionnaire may be used for the following oreangombination government referred toyasnd special district annexations and detachm , reorganization. Change of Organization A,ency. * Cardiff Sanitation District annexation A. The following items must be submitted with this application: 1. A certified resolution OR a petition of landowners/registered voters making appli- cation. a. If initiated by resolution, submit property owner consent form. * 2. 1 copy of a metes-and-bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject area. 3. A reproducible plat map and 14-Pxi-rfB. (8%2 by 11 corresponding to the metes- and-bounds) * 4. 2 copies of a vicinity map of the subject territory. (81-2 by 11} 5. Environmental documents: + a. Negative Declaration: If an ND dsolution Dhr prepared d for this project, submit 1 copy of the ND, Initial Study, + b. Environmental Impact Report: If an EIR has been pr fared EIR this pndixc, submit 15 copies of the certified EIR. Only 1 copy is required. Also submit a copy of the resolution certifying the EIR. C. If no environmental review has been conducted, submit a completed Initial Study form. . If the proposal includes annexation to a city, submit 1 copy of the city resolution 6 + eneral plan land use designations for the subject approving the prezoning and g territory. 7. LAFCO processing fee (refer to fee schedule). B. Additional information pertaining to the factors LAFCO must consider may be requested during LAFCO staff's review of the proposal. (7/07/87) 1 • CARDIFF SANITATION DISTOT AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: April 11, 1989 TO: Warren H. Shafer, District Manager FROM: 6FTom Henie, Utilities Planner VIA: Morton F. August, District Engineer ply' Robert A. Warren, City Engineer DATE: April 6, 1989 SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 89-07, Annexing to the Cardiff Sanitation District of 10.94 Acres Located at 425 Santa Fe Drive Between Interstate 5 and Rubenstein Avenue - Robert Hall BACKGROUND: At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Cardiff Sanitation District on October 27, 1988 , the Board approved a connection agreement with Robert Hall to provide sewer service to a existing agricultural building. Due to shallow groundwater conditions, disposal in seepage pits was unfeasible. On December 14, 1988, annexation procedures were started with adoption by the Board of a resolution of application (88-38) to annex the above mentioned 10.94 acres to the district. DISCUSSION: On March 6, 1989, the Local Agency Formation Commission adopted Resolution D.A. 89-2 approving the application for annexation into the Cardiff Sanitation District. The parcel is located at 425 Santa Fe Drive between Interstate 5 and Rubenstein Avenue (see attached vicinity and plat maps) . This annexation is necessary to serve a single restroom within an existing agricultural storage building. The on-site sewer line has been sized to serve only this one facility. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the Board of Directors: 1. Find pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15074 (California Environmental Quality Control Act of 1970) , that this project would not have an effect on the environment (Negative Declaration Log No. 88-198) . 2 . Adopt Resolution No. 89-07 annexing parcel to the district. th/02/cm4-1499wp5 1 (4-6-89/1) * Date 8 /8 /88 Name Robert R. Hall Address 425 Santa Fe Drive Encinitas , CA 92024 * As the proponent(s) for this annexation of property identified as 260- 181 -64 to the Assessor's Parcel Number(s) Cardiff SanitationDistrict, I understand and agree that annexing into the District does not guarantee sewer service or commit sewer capacity to the subject property being annexed. Also, the District by accepting the application does not represent that it will provide any treatment plant expansions or sewer line extension to provide capacity or service for the subject area to be annexed. Acceptance of this application and final annexation of the property only allows the property to be served at such time as the owner(s) of the annexed property pay all necessary costs for the sewerage facilities which can transport, treat and dispose of the wastewater generated by the property. This may mean the proponent(s) shall pay for a part or all of the required facilities to serve the property. * G� Signature of Annexation Applicant Robert R. Hall 2/2-012 { 1 Local Agency Formation mission • Date 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 452 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 531-5400 CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION/REORGANIZATION APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE I. This questionnaire may be used for the following changes of government organization: city and special district annexations and detachments, or a combination thereof, referred to as a reorganization. Agency Change of Organization * Cardiff Sanitation District annexation A. The following items must be submitted with this applicat 1. A certified resolution OR a petition of landowners/registered voters making appli- cation. a. If initiated by resolution, submit property owner consent form. * 2. 1 copy of a metes-and-bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject area. 3. A reproducible plat map and 14i)ri-r}t-s. (8z by 11 corresponding to the metes- and-bounds) * 4. 2 copies of a vicinity map of the subject territory. (8-1, by 11) 5. Environmental documents: + a. Negative Declaration: If an ND has been prepared for this project, submit 1 copy of the ND, Initial Study, and resolution certifying the ND. + b. Environmental Impact Report: If an EIR has been prepared for this project, submit 15 copies of the certified EIR. Only I copy of the EIR appendix is required. Also submit a copy of the resolution certifying the EIR_ C. If no environmental review has been conducted, submit a completed Initial Study form. + 6. If the proposal includes annexation to a city, submit I copy of the city resolution approving the prezoning and general plan land use designations for the subject territory. 7. LAFCO processing fee (refer to fee schedule). B. Additional information pertaining to the factors LAFCO must consider may be requested during LAFCO staff's review of the proposal. (7/07/87) 1 * 5. In as muchOctail as possible, please explain wh r P �is proposal is necessary at this time (e.g., an approved development or an existing structure requires service not currently provided or available). Agricultural storage building requires restroom if office use is included . Annexation is required for sewage disposal . High ground water table prevents subsurface"' sewage disposal . B. GENERAL INFORMATION * 1. Please describe the general location and physical features of the territory which is the subject of this proposal. Refer to major highways, roads, watercourses, 4nd topographical features. Parcel is located south of Santa Fe Drive and west of I-5 in the city of Encinitas . It is level , flat and has been used for greenhouses for many years . * 2. How many acres of territory are included in this proposal? 10 . 94 X * 3. How many people live within the subject territory? 0 x * . 4. How many registered voters live within the subject territory? 0 X. C. LAND USE INFORMATION o. Zoning For County general plan and zoning information call 565-5981. If subject area is within nfo. 565-5981a city, call that city's planning department., * 1. County N/A a. Is the territory within a county community planning area? X If so, which one? b. What is the County General Plan or community planning area designation? X . C. What is the existing County zoning? X * 2. City .ontact .ffected city a. Is the territory within a city general plan area? Yes If so, which city? Encinitas b. What is the city's land-use designation? _Existing : Residential 4-2.9du/a Proposed : Residential 3-2du/ac C. Has any city zoned or prczoncd the territory? yes If so, which City? E n r i n i t a s d. How is the territory zoned or prczoned? R-S-3 3 g. Is the subject territory to be annexed to an improvement district? No h. Specify any improvements (on and off site) that will be necessary to connect and serve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of these improvements and method of financing (e.g., general property tax, assessment district, landowner or developer fees). The landowner will pay for all improve- ments. A drainline from the building will connect to a 1000 gallon septic tank adjacent to its westerly side. Fluid waste will then drain to a holding tank for lifting by a one— half horsepower electrical pump through approximately 700 feet of two to three inch diameter pressure line. The line will run north and west across adjacent private prop- erty under the same ownership to a connection with an existing eight inch diameter stub I Cpacity of TCC_trilCnt Facility: from a line in an easement on the adjacent commercially used property. (1) What is the physical design capacity of the sewage treatment plant which will serve the annexation area? IMGD. (2) What is the current average daily sewage treatment volume of wastewater being treated at the plant? MGD. (3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity to service the territorv? If not, what plan does the agency have to increase its capacity? j. Capacity of Transmission Lines: (1) What is the physical design capacity of the affected sewer main (trans- mission line or pipeline) which conveys wastewater to the treatment facility? MGD. (2) What is the current loading rate of the sewer main? MGD. (3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity in its sewer main to serve the territory? If not, what plan does the agency have to increase its capacity? k. Capacity of Outfall Lines: (1) What is the physical design capacity of the affected outfall line which conveys treated effluent to the ocean or ocean outfall system? NMGD. (2) What is the current loading rate of the outfall line? MGD. (3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity in the outfall line to serve the territory? If not, what plan does the agency have to increase its capacity? 5 C. FIR T • E PRO EC TI 1. Is the territory currently within a fire district or city? Yes a. If so, which one? Encinitas Fire Protection District u, 2. If not, is annexation for fire protection part of this application? N/A 3. Is structural fire protection necessary? N/A 4. Location of nearest fire station: N/A a. Estimated response time: N/A (Priority) NIA (Non-priority) D. POLICE PROTECTION 1. What police agency currently serves this territory? City of Encinitas a. Location of nearest police station? N/A b. Estimated .response time: NIA (Priority) N/A (Non-priority) 2. What police agency would serve this territory if this jurisdictional change is approved? N/A a. Location of nearest police station? _N/A b. Estimated response time: N/A (Priority) N/A (Non-priority) E. SCHOOLS 1. Will development on the territory generate any school-age children? No How many: a. Grades K - 6 b. Grades 7 - 9 C. Grades 10 - 12 2. What school district(s) is the subject territory within? N/A 3_1 Are any elementary or secondary schools serving the subject territory operating above design capacity? N/A . If so, which schools? N/A 7 V. SPECIAL REVENUES - ANNEXING CITY OR DISTRICT MUST COMPLETE THIS SECTION A. Does the city/district have current plans to establish any new assessment districts which would include this area, in order to pay for new or extended services? Please detail. No B. Does the affected territory contain existing commercial activities which generate ten million dollars per year or more in retail sales? No C. Will the area assume any existing bonded indebtedness upon annexation to city/district? Please explain, and indicate taxpayer cost. Any existing bonded bebt becones the liability of the property owner-after annexation. D. Will the territory b.; subject to any new or additional special taxes, benefit charges, or fees? Please outline. Annual sewer service charge after connection to the public sewer system. E. Which service(s) to be provided to the annexing area by your city/district are presently being provided by another local agency? (please list each service and current provider). None F. Is the city/district requesting an exchange of property tax revenues as the result of this proposal? No G. Is a master property tax exchange agreement applicable to this jurisdictional change? No - H. If property tax exchange negotiations are necessary, upon receipt of this application all affected agencies will be notified of this proposal and provided preliminary information to begin the negotiation process. Engineering Technician II City/District Representative Title (signature) 694-3646 Phone Number 9 rim E=wnm&g for 86.6. Ism" and Appurmwmw •m6., Km*wANMmmbrTbm*hvmwvmw...-;"ITY TRUS-T.&..5AVjMZjm.wK.c#.!Am DllaDa l.ClrDtfetitG W M kind pow by dw dn4wwd Commam or on ift b" and 86 w-he"namdwmm A.omwp.1 'sa' '07 sad edw arii.ir is b-by 016FAmirk dw bra*rm sow a"in.- ..................CQWIFI-ZANIIAI.IUM -.d.. md b WWW&W&B w6w few pap 1,Sw dw imwmmw cwmwwdm ommi.� Pk. OW 00"* mm%$. I—W pqw jkbok-d U im.� rammon"Mm J www pqw kim $Ord. wok dw mpuw'au. by Grommm im;mww.wa so T.(r..d a ha,d said aawwrrr an/�J'r►lens iudl rd airs iw reae.ararr aed.rpr far•.ar. 71wrWp,-p,,rd—W_1 -"he =d wad .4im%"Weamm RM Nd b, .1 S-MO.3—of CAUMW16 ow i.pw"wr - 1.0 1 All that portion of the Northwest vjvrt*r Of 309tior, 22, Township 13 southe Nangg A West, S-8-M., according to United States Goverment 1-urvey arprovd April 19, 18819 described as follov.sl beginning at the Northeast corner of Said Northwest quart@r, thenco along the Northerly line of s4ik; Section 229 :,oath 89050' West 4,24.22 foot to the TkUZ POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 3059055" Easto 675600 feat, thence North 86000105" Eastq 15.00 feet; thence North 3059155" West, 323.50 feat; thence North 10300164 Easto 349.86 feet; thence South 890501 West, 48.66 feet to the TRUC- ;AINT OF Be- GINNING. Vol" APR 11 1951 4 • 1. T1.fi.r fa 77 a'kY..wa r•+"a dw arlan -:4 in drwrr A wd p.p.ry..wawa dr'd aw"'w"''"a a IN 79-11 dn.w....v w r w.•rd ff.w.w.r.l r'rr.t.n Nt<a.rrw.•• ..rf...,awd-WW p..id r new drl IN pifad . T6 rin—60.ry awwwwwre fad fora 1a hod(,his kr ti faaawaf,fdwnweww fray/mad ww 's.d.r drf AA ON k•Y/wawa.fyinum d wpm dM vbtrw red prit"M Or wdlr.fW -WI wrlf d of Mq krld"Or/f► M r fret a.ma,w kad d.r.dl -.0 M.r.dr dwa ON Of.J be(-- u.af.rs all awvis. Or dwaa.dl taow..tda dr yfr w VON 46"aaad araw.t by a.d Cswaaw•v rowan w f-V. t rft C.--hooky rwwaw,waad aooia/n rrB,w wfw••at.r.d fa►.'-s r w 1—h elan 1 r•d prpwy w a p ri b�±�r�r►�cw"�&A red, ,�cr•iwwd�ri/.•��f Aw dr r o .NO I..•.rrwawa/ }ON Of fwd df Q1dwf krAy w.warY od down dw.dr dw rrgf.r.�.q p-Iw br,as A" r do..= i 1 A.- draro fl arrw.w rd.y.1 wy Y-dl kvNr/am rA er+.fww.ui. rd dawwr Of ky Y M dr iw. i •7- y•r•a a 1.R and f.ff•wt•aw M y a.W '"Akb r rM I..d d dr urfawtdrry o"'atd .ward wll^i't•'••.•./«I ••/d••w r...wtf wire .dt IA,rnfta..al and.rN rtylrnr fr.►If..f rwwwed by i. 4 (As.•rd aka•w,dw ww'owwaa"dap w-"dw 0-al a-4 a raw and tM.adr 9diwrtf OW"his"dhd0 Ode&dw ldwair dwd rum/wi a Ow.r—M) j F..f.rd rid. /C ��` r1fF d •;/ ,. 1 •�: 10/A 7.000NIIT 71#XT 6 LAVINiL NANt UI SAN DJVA;, Sp.wl r.l.d dr./Jdis.1 b aAf parrs 1 a COrforJtifiti (SEAL) As wd+nbiti tetarar K" I(fBAL) ,II (SFi1L) Stitt O f California Thn n ro cmdy th"if..nrnnt m"Al preppy car•ryed M r j COIIty Of San Diego &L O � • .r... 19 o,"r drvd March 16, 1961 Od Narte6 16/ q 61 Ey..a.Cvmvato od Iran SECURITY TRUST AND SAVINGS.pNNK ., kill' well,Me aMm frcd OF SAN DIEGO,EGO, a toll prat i o« •s Nfl1.t Notary►•NK Y arty tN yid tppr � Ceurrl"d staff,tamale,iwvt/ wan the :ardi(f S.+nl t.tinn District ` is M• A. Stubbs ■pdwreal carpaanew and/or d• n . . Y u Infrrl't nt It k Me Yf.C• ►rct�t,aol .. rot•rnmern rt"y, Aerelry ' L. W. Kiaap rep[fd M or in of the Board of Di recurs wrkarJ.d ro of sai a._d.i. r 5 YMwo to we is k 11ia�t Officer 7eeetary d .. i.ir.'_st ..... { S f? wthMrpilalp�M�yy itr vatt". e ^d worda !'e nsr 1pA [ron eMfo it m ddy N 'autN te nMit .ah e(o-'•Ti_Irik.lenen U419 e -111 .0 1i1'tetwatrir Mores owed.wd fir rd.d.ad C w a adedtJl le nj�Al1.sRA to/metro eretutN Me nMw rate(rt.t dmw written. Oad: .10110" AL a/an't N'RI At lion or a Rnalutiert of ill R. B. JAMES. iO 9 Ok1Lpt! S. C 6&d Beard of Ueri� neA.n �(1tlEjta/ W aflkil uai ((iris dnk r S _ •.� r j. , roll.'. By`�!_talc.. `C"..r.lQ.i. !(S�r l/ ...... Man IIWaR�riMbr W taitr d It pte. .... .... ..Depxy der4 of tWBarrd r+ i Cerrwy C.mnrl Rwardn i +•a FiLF/►Ake:n0. ' CN r- I RECORDIO REQUEST 01 eountY ClArle� I u- APR 13 11 Ol AN'61 �j- - • SERIE:2 371119 11961 OF"L.i•Ai CORDS SAN DIi.GG!.'IUNfy.CALIF• �Wr: ROGER 4 hr►t.NfC9110ER � vt r1 r 4� hf Y O� pil�gja COUNTY ENGINEER COUNTY AIRPORTS GRANVILLE M. BOWMAN COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONER TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS DIRECTOR COUNTY SURVEYOR (619) 6942212 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FLOOD CONTROL (LOCATION CODE 750) LIQUID WASTE 5555 OVERLAND AVE. SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92123-1295 SOLID WASTE September 29, 1988 TO: Board of Directors Cardiff Sanitation District VIA: Warren Shafer, City Manager City of Encinitas FROM: Granville M. Bowman, Director Department of Public Works SUBJECT: Pat ition of Robert R. Hall for a Connection Agreement to ±�e MEETING DATE: October 27, 1988 This is a request to approve a connection agreement between the Cardiff Sanitation District and Robert R. Hall . This parcel currently contains an agricultural building. The owners are in the process of adding an office space with restroom. In order for the owners to proceed, this project requires a connection agreement. RECOMMENDATION: That your Board 1. Find pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15074 (California Envir- onmental Quality Control Act of 1970), that this project would not have an effect on the environment (Negative Declaration Log No. 88-198). 2. Approve the enclosed connection agreement. Board of Directors Ordiff Sanitation District . September 29, 1988 Page 2 Discussion: This property is currently in the process of being annexed to the Cardiff Sanitation District. This connection agreement is required for the owners to complete their project before the annexation can be completed. OJO GRANVILLE M. BO MAN, D'r ctor Concurrence: Department of Public Works None required Fiscal Impact Statement: Costs incurred, if any, will be paid by the proponent. G%18:SI :maS Enclosures: 1. Connection Agreement cc: Dwight G. Smith, DPW (0384) w/encls. Central Files, DPW (0328) " Encinitas, CA 92024 3/10-022 CONNECTION AGREEMENT The Cardiff Sanitation District, a sanitation district in the County of San . Diego, hereinafter called the District, and Robert R. Hall , herein- after called the Owner, agree as follows: 1. The Owner represents that the the Owner of the following described real property in the County of San Diego, State of California: Portion of the West half of the Northeast quarter of Section 22, Township 13, South Range 4 West A.P.N. 260-181-64. 2. That said real property is located outside of the boundaries of the District and adjacent to Interstate 5 and Rubenstein Avenue. 3. That the Owner shall have the privilege of connecting the sewer line from an existing building located on said real property to the District' s sanitary sewers known as the Cardiff Trunk. under the direction of the Department of Public Works of the County of San Diego, in accordance with the ordinances and regulations of the County of San Diego and the District, and shall be made at such place on the District's sanitary sewer and in such manner as the Director of Public Works of the County of San Diego shall specify. The cost of such connection shall be paid by the Owner. 5. At the time of execution of this Agreement, the Owner shall pay, to the District the sum of $150.00. The sum is in addition to the normal District capacity fee of $3,260.00 for the privilege of connecting to the District's sewer, said capacity fee is to be paid at the time of issuance of the Wastewater Discharge Permit. 6. The Owner, his executors, administrators, heirs, successors and assigns shall pay to the District through the Department of Public Works of the County of San Diego on the first day of each calendar month following the connection of said building to the sanitary sewer of the District a monthly service charge of $19.00 or $228.00 per year payable in advance. Said fee shall be paid pursuant to this Agreement until such time as the property upon which said building is located is annexed to the District. 7. The District shall have the power to increase the amount of the monthly service charge prescribed in Paragraph 6 from time-to-time in propor- tion to any increased cost or expenses or operating the District. 8. The Owner of said real property consent to the commencement of proceedings by the District to annex said property to the District. The Owner agree that upon annexation of the above described real property to the District said property shall become subject to any and all regulations, fees, taxes and assessments applicable to the property within the District. 9. The District agrees that upon connection of said property to the District's sanitary sewer, the District shall accept the domestic sewage from such building discharged into its sewer lines, which obligation of the District shall continue under the Agreement until such time as the above described real property upon which such building is located is annexed to the District, or until this Agreement is terminated as hereinafter specified, whichever first occurs. 10. This Agreement may be terminated by the Owner, his executors, admin- istrators, heirs, successors or assign by giving to the District ninety (90) days written notice of intention to terminate by serving such notice on the Clerk of the Board of Directors of the District. 11. This Agreement may be terminated by the District by giving ninety (90) days written notice of intention to terminate to the Owner, executors, administrators, heirs, successors or assigns, or to the occupants of the aforesaid. 12. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to authority granted to the District in the Health and Safety Code, Section 4742.1, and the parties agree that in no event shall this Agreement continue in force for a period of more than fifty (50) years from the date of its execution. 13. This Agreement shall take effect when executed by the parties. Dated this 27th day of October 1988. CLERKff THE BOA D OF DIRECTORS -�7 3/10-029mas I, E.j=' 't;7 -'OOL, Clerk of t 3'o2rd of [)!rectors of Sanitation District, Encinitas, California do hereby certify that the above and fc.cgoing is a true and correct Copy of the original of this document on file In my office. In witness whereof I have set my hand and the seal of the Cardiff S itat On DIStrICt this p day of 19 a fork of the Board w 4 �A/.2 1 3(D 64 0• 72 I 0.94AC c 55AC � o u l eV t?t'• a 1.77AC o 1.01 AC NO Nm 1.03AC '3J^W G/x.52 NW 1/4 OF �. /C•w NE 1/4 :.60AC . o 0 V � a: ,vB9eie'3a~E 760.za W .� 1-=200 4 56 :vas-� 0 11.43AC o, o aC Q 69 O J O S65 v V. a .56AC V O > op V c O a �h O V x SPEC 22 -7r/,3S-R il141 ROBERT R. HALL CONNECTION AGREEMENT Area 10.94 AC Existing Boundary ' 'Property Boundary CITY OF ENCINITAS NEGATIVE DECLARATION HALL PARCEL CASE NO. 88-213 ANNEXATION Project Title 425 SANTA FE DRIVE, CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA Location ANNEXATIONT OF A 10.94 ACRE PARCEL TO THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT Description CONNECTION OF RESTROOM, SEPTIC TANK, HOLDING TANK TO EXISTING LINE ROBERT HALL Project Sponsor FINDING: Based upon information provided in the Initial Study, along with Comments and Responses to the Notice of Preparation of a Negative Declaration which have been presented to the City Council/Planning Commission/Community Advisory Board, City of Encinitas, at a duly called meeting on �e . ,a the Council/Commission/Board finds that the project will n t have a /9 S significant effect on the environment. MITIGATION MEASURES: Mitigation measures included in the project as a condition of project approval to avoid potentially significant effects include: NONE NECESSARY A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to substantiate the finding. Dat Ma r City Council Y �� Chairman, Planning Commission Chairman, Community Advisory Board City of Encinitas 8/87 CITY OF ENCINITAS DETERMINATION BASED ON INITIAL STUDY HALL PARCEL CASE NO. 88-213 ANNEXATION Name of Project 425 SANTA FE DRIVE, CARDIFF-BY-THE-SEA Location Entity or Person Undertaking Project: ROBERT HALL Name 425 SANTA FE DRIVE, ENCINITAS, CA 92024 Address - Staff Determination The City of Encinitas staff, having undertaken and completed an Initial Study of this project in accordance with the City's CEQA Guidelines for the purpose of determining whether the proposed project might have a significant effect on the environment, has reached the following conclusion: X 1 . The project could not have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, a Negative Declaration will be prepared. 2. The project could not have a significant effect on the environment, due to mitigation measures accepted by the applicant which include: therefore, a Negative Declaration will be prepared. 3 . The project could have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared. /lwg - '_�' I, ,Y," D to Ci y jif Encinitas 8/87 INITIAL STUDY Hall Parcel Case No. 88-213 Annexation PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project is an annexation of a 10.94 acre Hall parcel to the Cardiff Sanitation District. Project liquid waste disposal improvements will include a single restroom within an existing agricultural storage building, a 1000 gallon septic tank, holding tank, one-half horsepower electric pump, 700 feet of two to three inch diameter pressure line, and connection to an existing eight inch sewer line stub. PROJECT LOCATION The Hall parcel is located at 425 Santa Fe Drive between Interstate 5 and Rubenstein Avenue behind the Santa Fe Plaza shopping center in the community of Cardiff-By-The-Sea (see Figure 1 ). ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The Hall parcel is used for growing cut flowers and potted plants in greenhouses. There is also an agricultural storage building with salesroom and office on the site. This parcel is designated 4 Residential (2.9 DU/AC) on the City General Plan (San Dieguito Community Plan) . It is classified R-S-3. Land to the north supports a commercial shopping center known as Santa Fe Plaza. Interstate 5 (I-5) lies immediately to the east. Property to the south and west is used for greenhouse agriculture. The commercial land to the north is designated 13 General Commercial on the City General Plan (San Dieguito Community Plan) and classified C-36. I-5 is designated 22 Public/Semi-public and classified S-94. Property to the south and west is designated 4 Residential (2.9 DU/AC) and classified R-S-3. POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS No potential significant effects have been identified. MITIGATION MEASURES No mitigation measures are necessary. RECOMMENDATIONS Research and review of project improvements, Environmental Information Form, supplemental materials, site, surroundings, and Environmental Checklist Form have failed to disclose any environmental issues. On the basis of this initial evaluation the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be prepared. rt•.`"' ,\--___-- ` ��`y`C/h T.►f�. _1--711 '/ �J----� SLV ,�y.�3� l 1 i{. �• u.I. ...r."V J b1711��^.lti ° [.] �•• r--�-! i W.r oz JJ=��` -i—JAJ���'T• 1 ...1.�!'r,-o•-'_--. I •i r-'�1 •1 .{ _ i ; "I;lb'� ' of !•f { r--r """ - ���.• 1:_ ..�Lr .. +. - vaw +� v 2;•� 'yl�. 2 t';.�•T.-Y.•..niCVZ, 771 J .l � -.._.lI i T1to I,-._.•� _�_-�• •-3.__-�-. , UT '••1; l�i.l�r.+u .t--;I GriL•A. C'$ ''1... r r✓nn _'.• I t'.1 f.d�.�_:_-�_-1l N d 'C.•�:=�' +4�'1 �•� -l•3,r •f' ��'JL� -j; `'V. 'S:� Ham i:.��, I� •'t "—.�,,,—��_____ _ -_--_,''- --�-.�_��.�.i�T ill :-'J �o- r•: ---�`—�t —i E?cATA4 1 _ .1 tKSVtTL C—r--• - « w•v kA Project` T 4.tiar.'. p,-i.r, t�•t� ` :vfr•A�t--! .1"-�^� { t R-/X:(J���i I Location MAP I It •ror `- �=t��...i-,•.r fir.. ... ..... � ' L a.• r..o �` . fI . �'--_� I _ 1 �, _•..v,'yL•_�3 �- .yam Z-�' r [`\ (Y�`�`�'t iV.�� _ tom' � � -••.[-r, 1_•-•7_r11t. a•as.>_L.• \r�`•i�i i•7t! �i/ia f L:-LL:yr'3-T�l 1'�--'-.- -: _ \ 1\ - ,+�L 1216' ter'{ .���cS.':.•• .. .r—' \^•f \ ✓1 '� t ► I f f r 1 .77 �C ��'� �� t'•�::t�IFrL'`ViD'l.`�'Tr:r�;,_•"� .'=;,,rte..=��:_'� �-- = \ -- � \ t�,•i•�.�•`;,{�w r`r•.r«l..t�y.y� St't .�,•'1.-_.��y�.i i-Z'7..y �T ' 0 500 1000 L I I Figure 1. Hall Parcel Location. APPENDIX I ENVIROMEMAL CHEMIST PC7f'3d (To Be Completed By Lead A;ency) - I. Back-g:mund 1. Name of Proponent ROBERT HALL 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 425 SANTA FE DRIVE 'ENCINITAS, CA 92024 (619)753-2532 3. Date of Checklist Submitted 5 JULY 1988 4. Agency Requiring Checklist CITY OF ENCINITAS 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable HALL PARCEL CASE NO. 88-213 ANNEXATION - - II. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) SEE ATTACHMENT Yes Mavbe No 1. Ba rth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in X geologic substructures? _ b. Disruptions, displacements, canpaction or X overcovering of the soil? _ c. Change in topography or ground surface X relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification X of any unique geologic or physical features? _ e. Any increase in wind or cater erosion of X soils, either on. or off the site? _ f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or X any bay, inlet or lake? _ g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, _ mudslides, ground failure, or similarhards? X :� Yes Mavbe No 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration X of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of di- rection of water move:ne:ts, in either n- ine or fresh water s? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pat- terns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X C. Alterations to the course or low of flood waters? - -- X d. Change in the account of surface water in X any aster body? — e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, x ------ dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground- waters? x g. Change in' the quantity of ground Raters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h., Substantial reduction in the amount of Rater otherwise available for public water supplies? X i. Exposure of people or property to water re- lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X 4. • Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or nun- •bar of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X Yes Mavbe No b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare x or endangered species of plants? _ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- x rent of existing species? _ d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultu_-al crop? x 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or nuW- beers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- g fish, benthic organises or insects)? _ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X c. Introduction of new species of animals into . _ - an area, or result in a barrier to the mig - tion or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? x 6. Noise. Will the or000sal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? x b. Exposure of people* to. severe noise levels? - 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or gla-re? x S. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a sub- stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? x 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Y 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or x upset conditions? 290 Yes Maybe No b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the hu.W.n population of an area? x 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing hous- ing, or create a demand for additional housing? R 13. T ansportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movenent? x b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or X demand for new parking? - c. 'Subst'antial impact ua,n existing transpor- x ,,ation systems? — d. Alterations to present patterns of circula- x tion or movement of people and/or goods? — e. Alterations to F2terborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic ham-_rds to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? x 14. Public Services. Fill- the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered gov- ernmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? x x b. Police protection? — c. Schools? x •d. Parks or other recreational facilities? x e. L1,_intenance of public facilities, including roads? x f. Other governmental services? x — 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x _1 Yes Mavbe No b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy, or require the development X of new sources of energy? 16. utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the X following utilities: 17. Hunan Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential X health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health haz2.rds? X 18. . Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open M public vieF? .. x 1°. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon-one quality or quantity of existing recreational onoortunities? x 20. Cal u_-al Resou_Tces. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or % historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or X historic building, structure, or object? c. Dees the proposal hive the potential to cause a physical c'nange which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X d. Will the proposal restrict--existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? x 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially .reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, ruse a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal ca=unity, re- duce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or ani=1 or eliminate • Yes Maybe No important examples of the major periods of x California history or prehistory'? _ b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-ter: , environmental goals? (A short-tee impact on the environment is one which occurs in a rela- tively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) x c. Does the project have impacts which a_-e individually limited, but =ulatively con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where tLe effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) x d. Dom the project have environmental effects which Rill cause substantial adverse effects x on h—m—n. beings, either directly or indirectly? III. - Discussion of 'Enavironmental Evaluation (Narrative description of environmental i cts.) TV. Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project CaJILD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a IvBC-ATIVE DECLARATION will be preoared. Q I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case be-cause the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet hive•been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DF"�...4PATION HILL, BE PREPAP.ED. ❑ I find" the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an E VIRON? 7AL I�LDACT PEPORT is required. ❑ 5 JULY 1988 a Date Si-nature For CITY OF ENCINITAS • (Note: This is only a suggested form. Public agencies are free to devise their ---• own format for initial studies.) • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Hall Parcel Case No. 88-213 Annexation II. Environmental Impacts Explanations of "Yes" and "Maybe" Answers 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: f. Other governmental services? The Hall parcel ownership has applied for annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District to dispose of liquid waste generated by a restroom in an agricultural storage building at the site. III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation Narrative Description of Environmental Impacts 14. Public Services (f. ). Annexation of the Hall parcel to the Cardiff Sanitation District is necessary to provide for disposal of liquid waste generated by the restroom facility at the site. The City has required this facility to be installed in the previously approved agricultural storage structure on the parcel as a condition of its building permit (87-112) . Seepage pit testing of the parcel and adjacent property under the same ownership and use by Robert Prater Associates (1988) has revealed that, due to shallow groundwater conditions, disposal in seepage pits is unfeasible. The restroom will contain two flush toilets, one urinal , and two lavatory sinks. It will be used only during working hours by 10 to 12 employees. Bathing, cooking, or laundry use will not be allowed. A drainline from the building will connect to a 1000 gallon septic tank adjacent to its westerly side. Fluid waste will then drain to a holding tank for lifting by a one-half horsepower electrical pump through approximately 700 feet of two to three inch diameter pressure line. The line will run north and west across adjacent private property under the same ownership to a connection with an existing eight inch diameter stub from a line in an easement on the adjacent commercially used property. The proposed waste disposal improvements are intended solely for service to the site and are sized to only support the restroom. The parcel is abuts the District boundary on the north and is within its sphere of influence. Adjacent unsewered property over which the line will cross is under the same ownership (Hall) and is devoted entirely to greenhouse use. Connection to the existing line will not require its extension. Although annexation would remove that particular obstacle to future development of the subject parcel for other than agricultural use, it in itself will not foster such development. Conversion of the site to some other use would be subject to the City General Plan land use designation for the site as well as other applicable General Plan elements, development polices, zoning, and other regulations in affect at the time. Approval of this annexation is dependent on the District abilities to transmit and treat the generated waste. Any future development at the site would also be dependent on the ability of the District to provide transmission and treatment at that time. HALL/IS