The URL can be used to link to this page

Elks Lodge . . CHARITY JUSTICE BROTHERLY LOVE . FIDELITY ":~ '~"'. \ / 1ßCltc\lo1eltt Nltb frotedibe @rber of 'Elks 12 'EnciniÌZ1s 't:obgr, :No. 2243 1393 WINDSOR ROAD BOX 243 CARDIFF. CALIFORNIA 92007 SERVING THE SAN DIEGUITO AREA December 19, 1988 Nancy Averill LAFCO 1600 pacific Highway, Room 452 San Diego, CA 92101 Re: "Encinitas Lodge Building Annexation" Ref: No. DA87-46 Dear Ms. Averill: we ~st re~est a six-month extension of time to c~lete the annexa- tion to Cardiff Sewer District. completion has been delayed by a tie- up of our building funds. Sincerely: carl S. Bohn, president Building corporation .7 /~ CAB:PC (/ ~~-~/ -- . . . LAFCO 1600 Pacific Highway' Room 452 San Diego, CA 92101 . (619) 531-5400 San Diego toea! Agency Formation commission 1 2 ('hairpl'fSon \lrì;ln I' I\ilhray January 9, 1989 (,11'""" 110",,1 or SIII"'r,,i"'" Memhers TO: Local Agency Formation Commission Marjorie lIersom Alpine Firl' FROM: Executive Officer Pro(l'tlion Dislric\ Dr. Charles W. Hostler SUBJECT: Request for Extension of Time to Complete Proceedings: I'uhlit Ml'mht'r Mark .I LOSLher the "Ene;nitas Lodge Building Anoexation" ,e the Cardiff Virl' Mayor, CiIY of Sanitation District (DA87-46) sao Marl'O' John Mad)onald ColinlY Uo;"d of State law requires that a proposal be deemed abandoned if the conducting Sllpl'r"isors authority does not complete proceedings within one year after LAFCO Stank)' A, Mahr approval, unless the commission authorizes an extension of time for san Marl'OS County \'Iatl'r Distric\ completion prior to the expiration of the one-year period, ¡'red Nagel The above-cited proposal was approved by your Commission on January ~\;I\or, City 01 \.I M"'" 11, 1988. A request for an extension has been submitted, and a COpy of ,\hhe wolhht'inll'r the request is attached for your reference. It is therefore (.OI,,"il1\I'mh<". CiIY 01 Sa" \)ìtï(l' RECOMMENDED...:. That your Commission authorize a six-month Alternate Members extension of time to complete proceedings for the Mike (;otLh "Encinitas LOdge Building Annexation" to the Cardiff I'uhlit Ml'Inhl'r Sanitation District (DA87-46). BrULe Ilendcrson collndlnll'mhl'r. City oj san t)il'~o G;\Y\c MLCand\i~s RespectfullY submitted, CollndlwOIna1\, CiIY of Chula ViSia John Sasso ~~~~ t'rcsid~1\t. Horrcgo Watcr Distrirl Leon L. WiIIi;lms Count) 1\0;,,<101' Sll\)l'f\'isol"' Executive Officer F xeclIt ¡'it: ()Ilicer \;\1\\' I' Mnrill J PM:na ( :. ,,!ltsd Attachment !.1m" M 1\.Il"lIIon,.1r. -- . . !'.: !mTES OF MEETING OF CARDIFF SANITATION I:::ISTRICT BOARD OF ~"iRECTORS, SEPTEMBER 16, 1987, 4:00 p.M., 527 ENCINITAS BI,VD" SUITE 100, ENCINITAS, CALIFORN:A Board Chairman shea called the meeting to oròe::::- at 4:35 p.M. present: Chairr.an Richard P. shea, Board Members Greg Lu}:e , Marjorie Gaines, Gerald st.eel, Anne omsted. Also Dist::::-ict l'~anage.r Shafer, District Attorney R 0 g e 1- p::::-esent: l',rauel, public Wor~s Director August, Board Clerk pool, senior Office specialist Cervone. There being a quorum present, the meeting waS in order. 2. ~ì.L COMMUNICATIONS None 3. Ç1oQâJNG AND ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR A. A roval of Minutes: Re ular Meetin B. Adoptjon of Resolution 87-33 ' lication of El}:s Lodae f o.r:. r\ bPnex~~ion to Cardiff sanitation [~~triç!~ D. Adoption of ordinance 87-10 Establishina Meetin 2nd £Dd 4th wednesdaYS at 4:00 P.Y~ E. for North count solids Mana eIT\ent Item 3-C was removed from the consent calendar. 3-C Adoption of Resolution 87-34 A lication of Devon E. Geis ~or Annexation to cardiff sanita~ion District~ Memb:::.r Gaines asked for clarification whether it \¡.,las the intent to build a single farr.ily re~idence on just the 0.19 acres for 'which anne):ation waS requested. public Works Director August stated he would research and report back to the Board at the nexc regular mee"C".ing. Hember steel as}:ed Mr. þ,ugust to also report back what the minimum required ' .¡.. size vias in that area. l. 0 \- ordinance 87-10 was read by Title adding section 1.1(,.010 to the Cardiff sanitation District code relating t.o Dist:.rict Board Regular Meetings. o::-.z":.e d moved, Luke seconded to waive further reading. Motion ca::::ried. Ayes: omsted, Luke, steel, Shea, Gaines~ Nays: None. steel moved, Luke seconded to adopt the consent calendar with Item 3C removed. Motion carried. Ayes: Gaines, omsted, steel, Shea, Luke. NayS: None. 09-16-87 PAGE 1 11tg. No 87-18, Bk. 1, page~ --- -- . . \ CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT. ~~mø:X~ æ Encinitas Boulevard Suite '\00 Encinitas, CA 9202~ . DATE: 9/19/87 TO. Local Agency Formation Commission 1600 Pacific HIghway RE:Encinitas Elks Lodge San Diegd, CA 92101 Annexation to Cardiff Sanitation District ATTENTION: FROM: E. Jane Pool, Clerk of the Board, Cardiff Sanitation District Enclosed xx Under Separate Cover - - Plea~ Find: Certified Copy of Resolution'CSD Resol. 87-33 Approving Application for Annexation, plus all papers needed for application process. VIA: Mail xx Messeng er Hand .- -- For your information Please return enclosures - - For your files Plea~ telephone me - - In accordance with your request Please read and advise me - -hoW to replY Plea se sign Plea se aoknowl edge with - -receipt ---~.- .------ Please complete XXX Plea~ handle - - Please read Plea~ record - - Please comment Please forward - - Plea~ notarize In accordance ...Iith our - -telephone conversation Comments: cc: CUY OF t-NCINITAS 87 -16 . F RM .. . . RESOLUTION NO. 87-33 ~SOWTION OF APPLI=ION of THE BO~ OF DI~CTORS OF THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY ENCINITAS ELKS LODGE WHEREAS, ~is Board of Directors has received a re~est from Encinitas ElkS Lodge (DOCument No. ) that the hereinafter described territory to be annexed to the cardiff sanitation District (hereinafter referred to as the Sanitation District); and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to initiate proceedings to a=ex said territo~ to ~e S=itation District; BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED as followS: 1. pursuant to Government code sections 56800 and 56700, application is hereby made to the Local Agency Formation commission of the county of San Diego for a proposed change of organization as followS: A. This proposal is made pursuant to the cortese-MoX Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 ($56000, et. seq., Govt. code). B. The nature of the proposed change of organization and the names of all districts for which any such change of organization is proposed as followS: The annexation of the hereinafter described territory to the . sanitation District. CCSD/87-33.RES - .... . . . all other affected counties, cities and c. The names of districts are: city of Encinitas D. A description of the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed to the sanitation District is described in Exhibit "A" hereto attached. E. said territory is uninhabited and comprises approximately 2.86 acres. F. It is proposed that said territory to be annexed subject to the following conditions: None. G. All the owners of land within such territory have given their written consent to such annexation subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions. H. The reasons for this proposal are as follows: (1) The sanitation District is empowered to and is engaged in furnishing sewerage disposal facilities. (2) The territory proposed to be annexed to said District is proposed to be developed and used for residential and/or commercial purposed and provision for sewage disposal facilities for said territory is essential for such purposes. I. It is hereby requested that proceedings be taken for the annexation of territory as hereinabove proposed. . J. This annexation is consistent with the sphere of influence of the sanitation District and the city of Encinitas. CCSD/87-33.RES . . . 2. pursuant to state ErR Guidelines section 15074 (California Environmental Quality Act of 1970), the Board finds in accordance with the Negative Declaration dated August 27, 1987, prepared with respect to the proposed annexation and the project designated P85-025, Log No. 85-8-16 that the project would have an insignificant impact on the environment. 3. The Clerk of the Board of Directors is hereby a~hOrized and direct~ to file a certified copy of this resol~ion willi llie Executive Officer of ilie wcal ~~q Fo=ation co_ission of ilie County of San Diego. PASSED and ADOPTED this 16th day of september, 1987, by the & following vote, to wit: AYES: Gaines, Luke, Omsted, Shea, Steel NAYES: None ABSENT: None ,1J- Richard P. Shea, Chairman of Cardiff sanitation District ATTEST: -£. Board . EJP/dc/87-33.RES CCSD/87-33.RES . . <1.l0Ul1t~ of ~al1 ~ lcBO COUNTY ENGINEER COUNTY AIRPORTS COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONER TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS ¡RANVILLE M BOWMAN COUNTY SURVEYOR DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FLOOD CONTROL 1619) 565-5177 LIQUID WASTE 5555 OVERLAND AVE. SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92123-1295 SOLID WASTE August 21.1987 TO: Board of Directors Cardiff Sanitation District VIA@ Warren Shafer. City Manager \;J City of Encinitas FROM: Granville M. Bowman. Director (0332) Department of Public Works SUBJECT: Petiti on of Enci nitas El ks Lodge for Annexati on to the Cardiff Sanitation District This is a request to annex 2.86 acres to the Cardiff Sanitation District. Recommendation: That your Board 1. Find pursuant to Section 15074. State CEQA Guidelines (California Environ- mental Quality Control Act of 1970). in accordance with the Negative Declaration dated August 27. 1987 prepared with respect to the Major Use Permit designated P85-025. Log No. 85-8-16 that this project woul d not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. Adopt the Resolution of Application of the Board of Directors of the Cardiff Sanitation District. Discussion: The zoning is RV3 which allows 2.9 dwelling units per acre (DUA). The Com- munity Plan is Residential 4 which allows 3 DUA. Annexation is requi red as a condition of approval for Hajor Use Permit No. P85-025 dated August 22. 1985 which is a project to construct an Elks Lodge. The property is located near Manchester Avenue and E1 Camino ~a1. Encinitas. . -- . . Warren Shafer Page 2 J\ugust 21.1987 fiscal 1m act statement: Costs incurred. if any. wi11 be paid bY its proponent. ~f W~ ROGERF.WAlSH ~ Chie! Deputy Director GAANV1LLE H. BOWMJ\N. Director concurrence Department of PubliC WorKs None required GMB:ss:mas Enclosures: 1. Resolution 2. Map and Legal 3. Petition 4. Negative Declaration cc: MarK S. Weston. DPW (0384) w/enclosures Central files (0328) \I \I Engineering J\lliance corp. w/o enclosures J\ttention: Jim Jenson 1717 Kettner Bl vd.. Suite 210 San Diego. CJ\ 92101 1/5-022 . . . . <11ouut'J of ~au ~ leBo COUNTY ENGINEER COUNTY AIRPORTS GRANVILLE M BOWMAN COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONER DIRECTOR TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS 16191 565-5177 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY SURVEYOR FLOOD CONTROL LIQUID WASTE 5555 OVERLAND AVE, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123-1295 SOLID WASTE J\ugust 17,1987 Local J\gency Formation ComffiSsion 1600 pacific Highway San DiegO. CJ\ 92101 Dear LJ\FCO Members: Subject: Mnexation to the Cardiff sanitation District petition of: Encinitas Elks Lodge I Notice is herebY given of intention to annex territory to the above named sanitation district, The annexation is proposed under the provisions of the cortese-Knox Local Gover_nt ~organizatiOn Act - Section 56000 et seq.. Gover_nt Code. J\ legal description (Exhi bi t A). a reproducible map and ten (10) prints of ilie specific boundaries of ilie terr;to~ proposed to be annexed. ~ (2) copies of a genera1 vicinitiY ~p and one topographiCa1 ~p are enc1osed Mre~th. In addition. the ori gi na 1 completed form of questionnaire and application. as required ~ the fo~ation C~i<sion. are su~itted. Notice. procesS and other communications regarding said annexation may _be directed to the proponents at the Department of Pub 1 i c workS. Liquid Waste Division, 5555 Overland J\ve.. Bldg~ 2 l 0384). San Di ego. CJ\ 92123. attention stephen Seibert, Very truly yours. GRAN~~~e~OGER F, WALSH De pa rtmen t of Pub 1 ; c Wo r~S ChIef Dep utv Director GMB:SS:ldm Enclosures . 2/8-02911 dm " COUN"~)¡: SA{\\ O~EG'-" ~~Â\Rcw.\~~ (di' W'\\@o\\i\\\ì\~ ~ \L~icl\ ij~ P\ñ~~ ""...d ",tit',. \0 ot1,c:<' ChoCked. - :;::':) \ R...tiir R~ôd :.,,"e B ~ \\;;I.\."n."\ C, LAí)\'Jlc" c', F.:õCi OR 0 33!, Vis V~.~ ::;",: '.-J ':>20' 1;"lIi" p,o~ó, :,J\\t i3 S;¡,,"'\ar;;,,~CA 9îQr,g,:-;;.3S -~ 'Sê"O':"'Ct. 92-.'23'6&6 Sa'" oie;O, CA 92"23,'56ó \û,Si ¡A,..r:j¡; \Ó'~" ;,6=,3C~2 \(,0\ 55':> 300' ¡\\1(J..1st '2.7,1935 ~On~ ~ ~û~1VE O~L~~\~ ?B5-0Z5, Log NO. 85-8-16 Si11rnan!~yman ; ~ssociates círDH~I". ~. ,\1e countY of sanD; ego. P1 ann; ng & ,-n.; ron",enta \ Re'; ew B~a cd l PER" \, \\as e,~lne1 we Inltla1 St"~ and finds wat we proposed proJect w\11 not nave a s ¡ gnlf I ca nt e Hect on the environment, and tM t sn Env ¡ ronm.nta 1 l:1\?act ¡¡,e?ort oe.d not be prepared pursuant W We San Diego Coun~ prcce@ces Ty' zoviro~ota\ l~act ~vi~, revised ~Ugust \. 1983, l~lÍlr>.l SiUD'! stW\\.\~R'! P?,oJlOc; D'.S;;R1Pn~\: Mm LOC~1l01:: To; s prcj ect ; S a ~\ajor Use perm; t to a 11"': a 16.000 Square foot meet~ 09 . f~i1;~ for we êìKS Lodge "ZZ~3 at 1411 ,eon;; court Dc,"2 west of c1 Cõ~,oo Re~ in ~ncini~ðS. IHO~~AS BROS. CoaRa.: 30, ~ ~yes ¡:...Hr>.L~Si: R.'J. t.;~y ~ San Die9uito subCegiona1/GO~. ?1an 4 ?esiceo':.ia1 3 å'J/f acres R~3 ese Regu1ation '2..9 dun acres ~"i~lRm,~\~"n'L s---'\'~ ~~ m siU Is a ~~, ~~ ~ ~ a ~11~ ~~ Is -~~~ ~ ~U c~~~ ~~~~. ~ b'~~~ ~p~- "H~~ 1'~ ~~ ~~. ~ ~~5 olub is juS' north.,;:1 tamino Rea1 is on the east, and suod:viSiOr.S are beyond. ,ine t,j 1) ,to?' \ s, ,.\ S \ h\ e: .1009 tyç ami OQ ~ea,1" ',"" " ,', ' \" .," ", .' PQiE\nl ~LL ~ :;1 GH lF1 CM:i ErtLCi S: .¡one. ~I~~ ~~m ~~~ ~ ~~~~: - . , ri OC to ~se 0 nd ?eoi.a "ee o¡Jon a n1 pHII'; ts or ;' cu ,oce of 9 ro<1; 09 pe cm; t, the , ap9'iCono.. enan to tn' satiOf,ct\on of til. J\,.ctO' of t'le ûepartr.ènt. o! ?~ð~~;n9 anÓ La~ë U5e~ - ~' e:~ . -~ " . -" --of' .~-:.'i' , P85-025. Leg No. 85-8-16 - 2 - f\ugust 27. 1985 1. Oedicote an irrevocab1e offer on (1 Camino Rea1 to the specifications 0 f the D epa l-t1'ì~nt of Pub' i C ~Iorks. 2. contribute 53000 to the lone 1 need control District. 3. Contribute W traffic signals, street i~rovement co.enants, and join \ 0 1; ght i og di s tel ct as sped fi ed by t"e Dep' rtmeot of pu b 1 i c \:or~ s . 4. ~~~u~" ~- ~u_a MU ~u u- ~ M~. H~U~~ not ~ be graded and state in we title prohibitions against vegetation re~oval. "." 5. èa ndsca?e slopes v:ith na t; ye ? -, a r. ts or 50me m;' of plants COMpat; b 1 e ...Ii th t'ne s;.¡rro"Jodir.9 c~astal ¡",-jxed ¡:ha~arral. 6. Li~t oo~~ 1i~~~ m - ~1~~ a~ ~~M 1~ ~ ~i~d floodlighting a't/ay fro:i\ nati'Je vegetation. ( R£~SO"S TO SUPPORT F 11m HiG OF :!£G~ T: v( O£CL~R~ 11 011 , Re~arch and review revealed ~O environmen~al issues which have nct been ait~gated to an insignificant le~el. ¡W1t.: This action becomes fino1 upon opprovõ1 ~ the oppco?ria~ ~ecis;on' mar. i n9 body. Additional cepies of this Negati,e Deo,.ration may be obtained at the ënvitonment<l ?lanning Section, C?LU, 5201 Ruffin Road, San Die90, CA 92123. - GERALD t.~. HER!V,,~!SOI~, Cr,air;7ìan Planning ~ ~nvironrnental R~view Board G.~H:R""'A:jcr cc: Ben Grò~~ ~ Project Hanager . . "El~s"Lo<1ge, 19571 Rcs.ll ,,$t",. $t.; 200.,$>00.; ego", é~ : ni21 ' ~11~~~M & ~-'"~' 1~1 ~~le ~.. W. ~. ~n M~; U 92121 . . - - . . '." ...' . .',. " no .."..""", "",..""""".. .""",..".,." '.,0.' ......"""",- . . ! " : , . COUi~e\r' -ü~ S Á f\& ,..- ~, _: -:-'-::;':- DR t; G" ~ ,'-'~" 1:"""">.' .' t..'fi.f¡;,..;;~', 'é." 0 - 1\ 1\ U\ ~~~.~......' ',j iQ)~~.@!f~lñf\i~íìì~Ç Q'\¡ f\"\\~ií1\!íj,:\If\\~ (Q; IL~\\ì(QJ lUJ~ !<:~t~,~n~, .-::-;...,/,,<.' . ~}.5..-;"/ --' ,.".~-_.,~~ O\¡'8~ ~"d reply \0 "t'..ce c"ø~"":I. -- C;:~~::h"i...P....;..,:;._.,~g .-. :;:l.lT:c;>'C It.,,.\'Ic, C1\¡:,E:TO;; r¡ :::;~ V,e VP'~ ;::w: ..-' 5a" l;~;O :A G¡~:J,1€-Ô~' .-- "'~v' h":';" RoaJ S""I~': f¡ --' ~~," \',J'::"S C;., S2Q;39,2S3S I'::, '9' :;;.;,":31)7: S~" ('.i.~cc :1, £-2~23 166<' 1(.1~\ 7~,~23S 'ê",~\ :.ó=,-,j(),J; Ì'W~lCf. OF APPROV¡\L Or t,\.~JO? ~s~ ?ERHl! BY -;\\ £ SA1:lH ~bO LOU flTr",-""r;l "õ E!¡""Dí,-¡:\E,,: "'- ¡En E '. BO ~RiJ - .- -- - Majot Use Pe~it N~,:¡er: P85-JZ5 Date of N~tice: ~.'J;l.:st 22. 19¿5 Carl c BQ~r., P1'~S i d~r-t Lan-:! -:.; ~ -~I;)~n .;. Ene; ni të:.S LQdC;e :1:;. 'Ú¿¡3 5i nill:ln. ¡!y¡¡.an & Asso:i ates 1393 \Ji ndsor Road. 3')x 243 10671 P.C:;~'I Ie ,stre:t Cardi ff. CA nOQ7 Së;n Die;:), ~Â 9212.1 I an AuguS:' 22, 1?S:: toe San Diego Coun~ p¡.nning c",ico~ental Re'i i êW B~erd (?~R~) CQndition~lY ~p~ro~ed your a~?ii:ati,'J¡"\ ';'0:" a ¡.'ajor Use Per;:t1t. Thi s ?ER3 dO': is ion bEOc",es fi na 1 co septo",jer 3, ",25 et 5 :00 P ,m, u01 ess ~~ m ~~ u~ ~ M a ~3"~ fi1M . ~u~ ~~~ m ~ P1~~~ . Go~issicn. ~iì;nç ~~ ân app2al ,', i 1 'l :;ta} the de:.-cisicn of .the ?~R3 until a ne" heiici n£ on )'O" r <?P 11 c at ion; 0 he 1 d a r,d ô:t. ; on j 0 ta.en by the P 1 <nn; ng Cc~is~cn (Refer tos~tiGn ¡Jéó aT we ~u~ wning Ordin,ooeì. if there is no a?~eãl on t~¡i5 cy-is~on of the ?EíŒ -;,n ~d 'ôt1'thin t~ tiíõ1e specified ~b(\\'e, t~is decision of the ?ERß will be fiíl~l. ïhis Y1,a.jor Use P erIn' t exp' res cn ~:Jo", t : ~, 198 ï un ì eS' ~ri~~ t,a th~t à~te u~e ;n re1iance or start óf CO"otruct;on ;0 coroe":ed. ~ * * * ~ * * ~ * , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * t ;certifY that the fcregúi og )Iotic.' of ~??rova1 of the ?,,~.3. wos .fi1 d ,;n the . [¡"PO l-tTIerot. 0 LP 1 ann i ng . and .u:nd .Us e and -a. COpy ')1er.O f was roan ed to :;he .app1ïcant .a<:. to;; Mdress sn?wn on:.too. appHc<t.;on. ... ..... .... .., " .. " :'J . I ",j..:". .!.;~ ".. /', ./ r .I. ,"..r".JJ"'r'.:.:/,.J-,.A -.- G.£P.AU) ;~. ~\Eji'::A!l~.C)~~, C\1ai nerso!1 ;;',i-,:ErG:::.b ~ C¡> 7he dOC; si on of .he 'ERb (i!,aj or èse ?e",i. \ wi ~ ~ 00 se"t unoer separate:o. er ,pp<c,im,tel)' one .ee' f<om tne d,XO of tni'. notic.. . . C:'L:j ;- DrnJ .~S¿7 ?,¡Î/'o3 - <fI"'\ ...,.. '1 4\ ~ ., ~.7 -, ..u>'~ """ ~ ~ -- ~ . D 'tø1 :u -U J;J '1 ~ .<. ~>~~'d ~l'~-' ...... .' ifd) ~ .~""'\t =(f ;r'li "'Ifì~r""~ @ \L~Iít~ \\JJ~ i ~ ~jpJ@~lhnlì @ ¡Ill ( (Q) í a":!~ In rllllí\l~ \QJ r- Ii '-'~ . Plazse fsply to: ( ,~I. Ladwi q . Dìr~c:::r l 1 Planning ¡ I 5:;:0 1 ==\ut~¡" ;:load . I SUit! a SUltl! as San Ci~c. CA 921:;:3 ',5 ~ 91 5ôS':;OOO ~5~91 5ôS,JQSé l ¡ :1~ Vi;! "~ra Cru:: : I C~c~s =~iorc:em!nt r' ?e;ulaté~ P'enr..n( , ! ~.;n ~.larc:O~. CÀ :::'::63 S",¡! 3 S:Jlt! 34 (6191 Nl...;.:;:3G (ôI915ôS-S336 16191 ,=õS.SSi1 Date August 22, 1985 Ca5~ =1.efe!"=nc~: PS5-025 10: Carl S. Boho. President Larry'Sillman Encinitas Lodge No. 2243 Sillman, Wyman and Associates 1393 Windsor Road. Box,243 10671 Roselle Street Cardiff, C,ß. 92007 San Diego" CA 92121 ( - 1 :,rtHy that the at,~hed ;5 a fu11 and true coW of the deo;s;cn of we ?1annin9 õnvir~nmentò1 Review Board (?ERS). The origina1 is on fi1e at ~e Depê!"~~ent of Planring and Land Use. If you 'nave any quest; ons pl ease ça 11 Ben Grame at 565- 5397 . fJ. ""/) }J^-";11.~w..:::...r^-- . /-~ /.. , /' Ge!"ald M. He~~nson, Chair'?e!"son - GHH:BFG:sb . OP'- # 520 (3-8-33) . '- " ; . .' - . ,,' --.', ',' '. - . , . -, . - - -- - . .. "'~-. '" , '\. , , .. SAN OI~GO COUNTY PLANNING ~ ENVIRC:W.EtlTAL REVIEW BOARD \'," - ' 5201 Ruffin Road \, August 22,1985 Decision of the Plannin and Environ~ental Review Board On the A p ication of Encinitas El~s lad e ADP lcatlOn Number ~-O25 GRANT a major use permit. pursuant to Sections 1346 and 2615 of The Zoning Ordinance, for an Elks Lodge (Lodge. Fraternal. and C¡v¡cAss~bly Civic Use type) for a maxim~ capacity of~OO persons and parking fo~ 124 eMS. The fo11owing conditions ~e imposed with the granting ~this major use . .- perml ..: A. Prior to obtaining ~y building or oth~ permit puAu~t to this major use permit. and prior to c~~nc~ent of construction or use of ,he property in reliance on this majDr use permit, the applicant shall: - 1. Execute an irrevac~le aff~ dedicating real property (on site) for public highway to 30 feet fr~ the centerline, plus slope rights ~d drainage easements for Tennis C1ub Drive. (NO) The offer of dedication or grant of right-of-w~ shall be free of all Encumbran~es or subordinãtion at the time of recordation. . 2. Execute a secured agreeMent to improve Tennis Club Drive (from E1 c~ino Real to the site) to a graded width of 40 feet with A.C. dike (an site), 24 feet of ~.C. pav~ent aVff approved ba~, a wood pole mounted street light at El C~mino Real to the satisfaction of the Director, Department of Public works. (NO) Fa:e of dike will be 13 feet from centerline (on-line only). These agreements require pos ti ng security jn accord "nee ,Ii th Section 7613 of the Zon; ng . Ord; nonce. . ¡ tal <;0 req"; res the; mpro. ements be co,"? 1 eted by . 24 months from the date, approving th'e major"use,permit,à prior ,to use Or ' ' 'Qccapancy of"thé fac;i,lity;,..whi¿he.ver:is ",adier., ,..' ,', ' ", ,,' :': , '" " " "' -'.'- " ' , ' .. ' . 3. Contribute $3.800.~O to the San Diego County Fled Central District Zone No.1, as his/her sh3re of future area flood cont~olídrainage improvements. (NO) 4. Join the Cou~ty Service A~ea being formed to ~ai~tain lux Canyon d;ainage facilities. ~ , . - - . . r - . . - . . '" ;/' ./" . i ," \ 1"1' - 2 - !':/ P85-0Z5 ' 0' Decision 5. Participate in the cost of tt"ãffic signal installation at the intersections of E1 C~ino Real with Pine Branch Drive and E1 c~ino Real with Manchester Avenue. The applicant's share shall be $930.00. (ND) 6. Execute a decIMation of coven~ts for s~eet improvements in lieu of i~edi~e inst~lation of Full Standard Street improv~ents including street lights. Thi s covenant shall decl are present and future owners of this property will not protest any special assessment p~oceedings fer constructing street improvements. (NO) 7. Have subject property annexed to the Cardiff Sewer District. 8. Submit for the appro~~ of the Directór of Pl~nning and Land Use a revis~d plot plan, showing the following revisions: . ' Revise the parking layout so that all parking is removed from the front yard setback uea (60 feet fr~ the centerline oLTennis Club Drive). ... 9. The plot pl~ sh~l show thrt over those ~eas of native vegetation not to be gr~ed and state prohibitions ~ainst veget~ion removal. or ~ddition, grading, or placement of any structure or any other thing, except for limited vegetation r~~oval if required for suP?ression by the fire marshall. 10. Submit to and receive ~proval fr~ the Director of Planning and Land Use of a complet~ and detailed land5cape plan. The landscãpe plans and review fe~ shall be submitted to the Regulatory Planning Division. P1a~s shall include: - a. Indication of the proposed width of any adjacent public rignt- of-way, a~d the locations of any required improvements and any proposed plant materials to be installed or planted therein. The applicant shall also obtain a permit from the Department of Public\'/Drks approving the variety, location and spacing of all .. .' trees p.ropbs~d ~.o :b~ ~l anted within said. right(S)-of-way. . ..' . . ;' b~' Acemp 1 ete pi ant ;.l1g P 1 an. ; ~c\ uO i~g t~e' nomes. 5; le; and i oc at; OIis of ~l plant ~aterials, including trees, shrubs and ~ro~ndco~~r. Wherever approp~iat~ native or natura1izi~g plènt materials shall be used which can thrive on natu~al moisture ot~er than such irrigation as is necessary to est~blish the plantings. . -- r .. - - . . - . . .. ~\ \. , '" '\ P85-025 - 3 - ~ . . . , OeclSlon .. c. A complete watering system including the location, size and type of all backflow prevention devices, press~re and nonpressure water lines, valves and sprinkler heads in those areas requiring a permanent irrigation system. For areas of native or natura1izing plant material, the landscape plan shall show a, method of irrigation adequate to assure establishment and growth of plant material through two growing seasons. d. Finished eìevation of the proposed grading. e. The following specific items shall be addressed as part of the landscape plan: 1. Particular atte~tion taken to preserve and protect natural vegetation areas shown on lot plan dated June 20, 1985, or subsequently approved plot plan. 2. Screening of parking area by vegetation. I 3. Landscape slopes \'/ith ñative plants or some mix of pl,ants compatible with the surrounding Coastal Mixed Chaparral., (NO) f. The location and type of walls, fences, walkways and lighting to be installed. Limit outdoor lighting to the building and shield lights away from native vegetation. (NQ) B. Prior to approval of street improvement plans by the Department of Public Works, the applicant shall: 1. Deposit with the County of San Diego, Through the ~epartment of PuDlic Works, in care of the :ashier, a cash deposit sufficient to: a. Pay the cost of annexing this land, without notice or hearing, to an existing special district tc operate and maintain the street lights. This cost shall include the fee for processing througn the State Boarà of,Equalization~ b. Energize", m2.~nt~ii1 ,and operate the streetlights until revenues , begi,n accruing frqm' this d~veTopment'for those'purpose.s.' " ,', ,,' c.' Augmënt the Cbntig'ency fiHld 'of' fhe'" existing di strict b.Y' an amount :" equal to three months' operating costs of the street lights. d. Augment the í{eserve'rund by one montn's operating cost. C. Prior to any occupancy or use of the premises pursuant to tnis major use permit, the appli::ant shalì: . 1. Payoff all existing deficit accounts asso::iated wi~h proceising this application to the satisfaction of the Department of Plarining and Land, Use and Depar~ment of Public Works. .. . - . - ; ..F. .. . . .'/ ';f... - ~ - }.'. P8S-085 ~., Decision I,' 2. Furnish to the Director of Plan~ing and Land Use åocumentary evidence from the Department of Public Works indicating that the following prereQuisire conditions have been satisfied: Conditions A-l through A-6. 3. Improve a 11 parking areas and d1~ i veways sho\'m on the approved plot plan with a minimum of one anà one-half inches of road oil mix, asphaltic co~crete or PCC concrete, and deliniate parking spaces. 4. Obtain a permit from Department of Public Works for work in the right-of-way. 5. Submit a certified statment by a licensed landscape architect that the 1 andscapi ng and wateri ng .system have ~een installed pursuant to the approved lòndscape plan. D. All light fixtures shall be designed and adjusted to reflect light downward, away from any road or street, and away from any apjoining premises, and shall otherwise conform~o Se~tion 6324 of The 20ning Ordinance. c No loudspeaker or sound amplification system shall be used to produce .... sounds in violation of the County Noise Ordiriance. F. The parking areas and drivewãys shall be w~ll ~aintained. G. All landscaping shall be adequãt~ly watered ~nd well maintained at all ...' l.imes. H. All outdoor activities, excluding parking, shall be limited to daylight hours only. 1. All me:hanical equipment to be placed on the roof of the building be screeì1ed from view from a horizonta1 vie.." p:>int. J. This major use pennit expires on August 1, 1938 at 5:00 p.m. (or such longer. period. as may.be approved by t~e Pianning and Environmental Revi.ew B~~rd the County of:San Diego prior to said expiration date) unl~ss.' .' . cOn s truct; an or: ¡lSe ; n re li.nœ:. an th is "'.3 or. US e permi t h ~ commenced..' . . ~jM ~ ~d u~~~~ d~.' . .' . Pursuant to Section 7358 of The 20n1n9 Ordinance, the following findings in support of the a~proval of the major use permit are made: (a) The location, size, design, and operating charù:t€ristics of the pro~osed use will be compatible with and wiïl not adversely sffeet or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, residents, buildings, struc.tures, of natural resources with consideration given to - -.' - . . . - \ " " '. P85-025 - 5 - \. '\ , \ 1. Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density " \ "- The fact (facts) supporting Finding (a-l) is (are) as follows: The applicant has refined his design so as to minimize grading and retain natural topography so that it is compatiDle to both the adjacent open space and the existing tennis club. The nearest residences are either well screened or at a reasonable distance from site. 2. The availability of public facilities, services, and utilities The fact (facts) supporting Finding {a-2) is (are) as follows: All public facilities and services a~e available to the site except sewer. A condition of approval will require annexation to the Cardiff Sev:er Di strict. 3. The narmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhOod character The fact (facts) supporting Finòing (a-3) is (are) as 'follows: The harmful effects of grading, noise, and visual impacts were considered and subject to siting and conditions, these have been miti gated. 4. The generation of traffic and the c3.pacity and physical character of surrounding streets The fact (facts) supporting Finding (a-4) is (are) as folloVIS: Traffic to the site will be on Tennis Club Drive wnich provides direct access, within a short distance, onto El Camiso Keaì already developed with multiple traffic lanes. :). The suitaDility of the site for th2 type and intensity of use or development which is proposed The fact (facts) supporting.Finding (a-S) is (ar~) as follows: . . . . '. .portion's of.the site håve. beencistJròed. ' The natural areas 3.iong the . southerly portion"oftbe'pro¡)érty ".':i~;l'aè ;:¡ë.intaii1ed~""As:desi9ñed tile"": use is suitaole for the site. - 6. The harmful effect, if any, upon en'::' ~,l:;~e:1l.:" :jLi3.lity e.nd natural resources The fact (facts) supporting Finding (è-Ó) B (are) as 70110\'/s: Subject pro~erty is in the Coastal ~esoLrce ?~vtection .a~e~ anû environment~ concerns relative"L.o suDject to siterha~~ peen .resolved . and mi~igating measures agreed to by :ohe applicant and a Negative. Declara:ion adopted. ~ -'..'-.-."" . --,- : . ,~.' ~' - .- ',~': jl' - . ,~ ; --,.( ,"f N' -of! ~f:P85-025 - 6 - l Deci si on (b) The impacts, as described in Findings (a) above, and the location of the proposed use will not adversely affect the San Diego County General Plan. The fact (facts) supporting Finding (b) is (are) as follows: The use is compatible to the Community Plan sin:e this civic use is- permitted in existing zone. Also the Coastal Resource Protection Regulations were placed on the site. Approval is based on property consideration and compliance with General Plan policies 124 "Coastal Resource Protection overlay and related policies including but not limited to Policy 31 (Conserve Mixed Chapparal), Policy 32 (Coastal Sage Scrub Habitats), and Policy 33 (Natural Habitats). I - PU\Nii!f;G Eì1VmC~t:ì£HT;'L \ REVIEW ga'}.~RD , J .. " , .'~.~... ,'q ";;-, , . f~;:}~~f'~~",.'~' r..:"!;T~ 8.2-7. I ~S {Hv.."IJ.:.....J b-'!:o- . ...... '" r - . . . ~ .. . \ . . PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT Petition of ENCINITAS LODGE BUILDING CORPORÞ.TION, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ALL THAT PORTION IN THE CITY OF ENCINITAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 2, PARCEL MAP 2162, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY AND LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED BOUNDARY: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; 1) THENCE SOUTH 00-02-55 EAST 479.18 FEET; 2) THENCE NORTH 89-56-16 WEST 170.74 FEET; 3) THENCE SOUTH 00-03-09 WEST 10.56 FEET; 4) THENCE NORTH 89-50-54 WEST 145.11 FEET; 5) THENCE NORTH 00-03-09 EAST 355.00 FEET; 6) THENCE SOUTH 89-50-54 EAST 210.00 FEET; 7) THENCE NORTH 00-03-09 EAST 135.00 FEET; 8) THENCE SOUTH 89-50-54 EAST 105.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. . . EXHIBIT "B" 1 t 1f'é5TER AVE L .~ . I EL NO. ,39'0'1"£ ZflOO ':J; REAL. ~ - . ~ \'C) ~ f".) II¡? ,} ,'1."- ';' \S ../1 c.-.'-~L- r~ ~, I / (-'(,[- " #8' 5iÞ ï""¿¡ /70.7'" --- 50 Oð'O~"W 10.6'" AlIJ&l°,5ð'õ4"W 145,/1' ôC/K.é-' IN~eø~ -z:- PROPOSE/J .4NA/é..t'A'T/OAI TO TilE CARLJ/FF S/JAI/Tllr/OA/ O/STR/CT. PROPOS€"0 8Ot/AlIJ.4RP - - - IlRé/1.. e. 8~ /JCRé5 PéT/T/O# OF ENCfNITAS I.OÐGé: B(J/LIJIAlC; ClJRPtJR.4T10A!J /NC , "l C/lt../FtJRAlIIl CORP. II.PA/. e~e-/ø -ez I Ie' ~ . "' . . , ---,----- -.,----... VICINITY MA~ '. ""'f.-' , " . I . I -. - '.' ~ . . , . - - . I , . . TO: Board of Directors Cardiff Sanitation District The undersigned property owners* in the vicinity of APN 262-160-22 in the unincorporated territory of the County of San Diego respectfullY request and consent to the commencement of proceeding for the annexation of the property , described opposite our names to the Cardiff Sanitation District and further consent to this annexation subject to any and all regulations, fees, and/or charges established under the provisions of existing Cardiff Sanitation District ordinances. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED . Please sign State Lot, Block, Subdivision's name and Map No. or Section, Township and ASSESSOR'S DATE NAME AND ADDRESS Ran e or Address of Pro ert .* PARCEL NO. /28/87 Fo~ Parcel 2 P.M. 2162 cltylof - {lp- Z-Z- Jjrn Jensen for Encinitas, County of San Diego, ENCINITAS LQD3E BUILDING CORP., INC. state of Ca1ifQrnia c/o ENGINEERING ALLIANCE CORP., 1717 KEITNER BLVD. SUITE 210 . SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 PHONE: . (619) 233-4644 ... . SIGNATURE: ~ DATE: 5 28-87 'If pr~erty is in esc~. ple~e rote ilie ~proximate dare of c~pleti~of escrow. Please return petition to: . ,. Cou~y'of San DieRO . DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 5555 Overland Avenue - Building 1 San Diego, California 92123 Attn: Steve Seibert 0384 Phone 565-5826 .- . . .. CONSENT TO INCLUSION OF PROPERTY The undersigned owner(s) of property hereby consent(s) to inclusion of that property within a proposed annexation/detachment/reorganiza- tion, to wit:' . t Annexation to ~~/District Cardiff Sanitation and/or Detachment from City/District f (If consent of 100% of the affected property owners is affixed, the Commission may consider the proposal without a public hearing. If the proposal is submitted-by petition signed by 100% of the affected property owners, this consent form is not necessary.) l DATE NAME ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO(S) 5/28/87 2~2 - #(7 - z -z- Jim Jénsen for ENCINITAS LO]X;E . 'RT1TT .Tì!l"!'"'- r("\PP ,1ì'lC A CALIFOHNIA CORP. c/o ENGINEERING ALLIANCE CORP. 1717 ~ BLVD. #210 SAN DIB30, CA 92101 SIGNATURE: ~ 5/28/87 (Attach ~ . (Calif. Gov't Code Sections 35151, 54797.1, 56261) . . Date. " 5/26/87 Local Agency Formation Commission 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 452 San Diego, California 92101 (619) 236-2015 ANNEXATION AND DETACHMENT APPLICATION AND QUESTIONNAIRE (X) ANNEX Application is hereby made to ( ) DETACH territory to/from the (Name of Agency) This application also applies to the following proposed annexations or detachments involving the same territory (NOTE: each proposed annexa- tion or detachment is separate under law and requires separate fees and separate forms. N.A. I A. This proposal includes: Yes No 1. 12 or more registered voters ( ) (X) 2. 100% consent of property owners <x) ( ) B. Include the following items with this application: 1. A certified resolution OR a petition of landowners/registered voters making application. 2. One (1) copy of a metes-and-bounds description of the perimeter of the subject area. 3. A mylar or sepia parcel map and ten (10) prints. 4. Two (2) copies of a vicinity map of the subject territory. 5. A copy of any environmental documents (pursuant to the CEQA) associated with the subject property. If an environmental impact report (EIR) was prepared, 15 copies of the certified EIR must be submitted. (Only one copy of the EIR appendices is required). 6. Processing fee (contact LAFCO office for amount). C. Where applicable, consent forms should be.submitted (see A 2. above). D. Additional information pertaining to the factors LAFCO must consider may be requested during LAFCC staff's review of the proposal. (6/12/84) -1- - . . . State law requires the San Diego LAFCO to consider the following factors when reviewing proposals. According to Commission policy, it is the applicant's responsibility to demonstrate that the proposal is justified in accordance with these criteria. In completing this application, please keep these .fac tors in mind. I FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED BY UFCO (Calii. Government Code Sec. 54796) 1. Population, density, land area and land use, per capita assessed valuation, topography, natural boundaries. drainage basins, proximity to populated areas, likelihood of significant growth during next ten years. 2. Need for organized community services, present cost and adequacy of government services and controls, probable future needs, probable effect of change of organization and of alter- native courses of action on the cost and adequacy of services and controls in the area and adjacent areas. 3. The effect of the proposed action and of alternative actions on adjacent areas, on mutual social and economic interests and on the local governmental structure of the county. 4. Conformity of the proposal and its effects with c~ission policies on providing planned, orderly, efficient pattern~ of urban development and with state policies and priorities on conversion of open-space lands to other uses. . 5. Effect of the proposal on maintaining the physical and economic integrity of lands in an agricultural preserve in open-space uses. 6. Definiteness and certainty of the boundaries of the territory, the nonconformance of proposed bo~~daries with lines of assessment or ownership, the creation of islands or corridors of unincorporated territory, and other similar matters affect- -ing the proposed boundaries. 7. Conformity with appropriate city or county general and specific plans. . 8. The "sphere of influence" of any agency which may be applicable to the proposal being reviewed. I I .. ... \ LAFCO will consider the person signing this application as the pro- ponent of the proposed action(s). Notice, process and other communications regarding this application (including fee payment) will be directed to the proponent at: ENGINEERING ALLIANCE CORP. 1 71 7 I<EI'l'r\'ER BLVD., SUITE 210 Address: Sl'l.J DIEGO, CA 92101 Attn: JIM JENSEN Phone No. : Signed: '< R P NT F ENCINITAS WI:GE BUILDJNG CORP., INC. -?- A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION . . . San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission Annexation and Detachment Application Questionnaire I. Justification In as much detail as possible, please explain why this proposal is necessary at this time (eg.,an approved development or an existing structure requires specific services not currently available). Condition A.7 of Major Use Permit P85-025 states: (Have property annexed to the Cardiff Sanitation District.) On site leach lines or vertical pits are not recommended by the Health Department. j \ - \ - . I II. Services Affected List all community services which will be affected by this proposal. What will be required to provide these services not presently available or to replace services which maybe eliminated by this proposal? For example, what will be the estimated cost to extend sewer or water lines or to purchase new equipment? Operation and maintenance of public sewer system. All costs to be paid by the property owner. t.."- . -3- . . " III. Land-Use Information All questions in this section must be answered. A. Please describe the general location of the territory which is the subject of this proposal. Refer to major highways, roads, rivers,and topographical features. 430' westerly of El Camino Real on Tennis Clib Drive in the City of Encinitas. B. How many square miles, or acres, of territory are included in this proposal? 2.86 acres C. How many people live within the subject territory? -0- How many registered voters? -0- What is the source of information for each answer? N/A D. What is the existing County zoning? RV 3 I E. What is the County General Plan designation? County Residential 4 (2.9 DUlAC) F. Is the territory within a community planning area? If so, which one, and give the community plan designation. City of Encinitas San Dieguito C~Gial Plan G. Is the territory within a city general plan area? If so, which city, and what is the land-use designation? City of Encinitas #4 residential (1986 County General Plan) H. Has any city zoned or prezoned the territory? If so, which city, and how is the territory zoned or prezoned? (CO. RV 3 Zone) 2.9 DulAC I. Does any portion of the subject territory contain any of the following: Agricultural Preserve Flood Control Channel Scenic corridor zone River or creek Open-space easement IOO-year' flood line Airport noise contour Coastal bluff Coastal permit zone Yes . Archaeological/historical Sewer moratorium area features Slopes greater than 25% Yes Other unusual features Mature trees (specify) \ -4- > . . . J. How is the territory presently used (eg., vacant groves; 3 single-family residences, etc.)? Please be specific. vacant lot K. How are adjacent lands used? North: Single family and multi-family residential East: Vacant lot South: "Kids Unlimited" site West: Vacant lot L. How is the subject territory to be developed? Has a subdivision or lot split been approved by th~ County or by a city? Y£5 If so, what agency has approved the map, and what is its reference number? For parcel 2, P.H. 2162 County of San Diego M. If no specific development is planned, will this proposal increase the potential for development of the property? No If so, what type of development could be expected? How many new residential units could be expected? N.A. IV. Services Inventory All questions must be answered. A. Sewer 1. Sewer System? OR distance to tie-in 450 I . capacity of new line ~~IH £),~;:b flows from project /' -< /.bP "t:p#1" "will serve!! letter? Yes (Cardiff Sanitation - -c;- . . <' 2. If a sewer system is to be used, what agency will provide the service? Cardiff Sanitation District Has annexation already taken place? No Is the agency prepared to immediately furnish the necessary service (including capacity)? Yes If not, explain. See Cardiff Sanitation District memo dated 4-1-85. 3. Will industrial waste be discharged? No (If yes, attach a discussion of the provision for disposal and any special permits required). B. Water 1. Water will be supplied by (Name of agency or by what method) Has annexation already taken place? Will the project be connected to an existing water line? Is the agency prepared to immediately furnish the necessary service? If not, explain. I 2. What is the anticipated water demand for: a. Residential use GPD b. Industrial/Commercial use GPD c. Agricultural use GPD C. Schools 1. Are any area schools operating above design capacity? If so, which schools? 2. Will the project generate any school-age children? How many: a. Grades K - 6 b. Grades 7 - 9 c. Grades 10 - 12 D. Fire and Police 1. What jurisdictions will provid~ fire and police services? -6- ~ . . . 2. Has annexation already taken place? 3. Nearest fire response time J 4. Nearest police response time E. Transportation 1. Designate the names and types of roads which the project will use for primary and secondary access (include direct access streets from the project site to nearest freeway): Street Name Type (Right-of-way width) t 2. Is widening of an existing street necessary? 3. Is the project served by County-maintained roads? 4. Is construction of new access streets necessary? 5. What is the distance to the nearest shopping center? mi. Is public transporation available? ---- How distant? mile(s). v. Special Revenues - THE ANNEXING DISTRICT/CITY MUST COMPLETE THIS SECTION Does the District have current plans to establish any new assess- ment districts which would include this area, in order to pay for new or extended services? Please detail. NO . -7- . . " Will the area assume liability for any existing bonded debt upon annexation to the District? Please explain and indicate taxpayer cost. Any existing bonded debt becomes the liability of the property owner after annexation to the District. Will the territory be subject to any new or additional special taxes, benefit charges, or fees? Please outline. . Annual Sewer Service Charge after connection to the public sewer system. I What service(s) to be provided to the annexing area by your agency are presently being provided by another local agency? (Please list each service and current provider). NONE Does the affected territory contain existing commercial activities which generate ten million dollars per year or more in retail sales? -8- No .. . . - .,' " Is the district requesting an exchange of property tax revenues as the result of this proposal? NO Has the County made a determination regarding an exchange? NO If so, please attach a copy of the County resolution regarding the property tax transfer. If negotiations are not complete at this time, upon receipt of this application LAFCO will notify all affected agencies of this proposal and provide preliminary information to begin the negotiation process. D'Q{~~:~ature) Engineering Technician II Title VI. Public Contact I A. List all agencies, groups, and individuals contacted regarding this proposal. , ',',', "-'. .. ,'" None. B. Has a survey of the sentiment of property owners within the subject area been conducted? If so, what are the results? No . -9- . . . ~.~- Signed -- (Sign ture) ROGER F. WALSH Chief Deputy Director NV ILL E t." BOWHAN Print or type name) Representing DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HORKS Address M.S. 0384 Attention: Steve Seibert Phone No. 565-5826 Date I NOTE: If you wish anyone other than the proponent of this application to receive notices and reports of these proceedings, please call the office of the Executive Officer at (714) 236-2015. . -10-