1990-572098
..,.
. '. <0 . 1486. 90 572098
..
,.,.,~;"¡1tbtN
SAN DIEGO COUNTY , .;-Y:-i'~'¡Fttcnrms
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION ""'5:,'i;ÖÜÑlY, c¡\
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION '1'11- 1". A'" . -. -9: (\s
<\,,0 ",1 22 AM \1
"Marty Montgomery Annexation" to "..t. ',+ " >
PI C d. ff' S . t t. D. 't . t~ VERA L LYlEij.
ease return to: ar: 1 an1 a 10n 1S r1C r£'..+I.>'"1"" ßt:f'UROER
LAFCO MS A216 ..,. -~1,~" ! L""... '-
, ....,~-
Ref. No. D4Rq-??
8OÆ!
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 57200 and 57201, this Certificate is hereby
issued.
The name of each city and/or district involved in this change of
organization/reorganization, all located within San Diego county, and the type of
change of organization ordered for each city and/or district is as follows:
Citv or District TvDe of Chan2e of Or2anization
Cardiff Sanitation District Annexation
A certified copy of the resolution ordering this change of
organization/reorganization without an election, or the resolution confirming an
order for this change of organization/reorganization after confirmation by the
voters is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein.
A legal description and map of the boundaries of the above-cited change of
organization/reorganization is included in said resolution.
The terms and conditions, if any, of the change of organization/reorganization are
indicated on the attached form.
I hereby certify that I have examined the above-cited resolution for a change of
organization/reorganization, and have found that document to be in compliance with
the Commission's resolution approving said change of organization/reorganization.
I further certify that (I) resolutions agreeing to accept a negotiated exchange of
property tax revenues for this jurisdictional change, adopted by the local agencies
included in the negotiations, have been submitted to this office, or (2) a master
property tax exchange agreement pertinent to this jurisdictional change is on file.
t"
~ f.~ C-L Date October 10. 1990
NE P. MERRILL
xecutive Officer
. . 8488
.. ,
" RESOLtJ'1'ION NO. '0-01
~,
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
ANNEXING TERRITORY TO WHICH OWNERS HAVE CONSENTED
"HARTY MONTGOMERY ANNEXATION"
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act of 1985 (Govt. Code, Section 5600 et seg.)
preliminary proceedings were commenced by resolution of application
by this Board on April 11, 1989, as Resolution 89-09, for
annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District (thereinafter
referred to as the District) of certain territory therein
described, which description has been modif ied pursuant to the
directions of the Local Agency Formation Commission; and
WHEREAS, the annexation proposed by said resolution of
-, application was presented to and approved by the Local Agency
~
Formation Commission of San Diego County on December 4, 1989, and
this District was designated as the conducting district and
authorized by resolution to order said annexation without notice
or hearing and without an 'election pursuant to Government Code,
.
section 56837;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, ORDERED AND DETERMINED,
pursuant to Government Code Section 57025 et seg.;
a. The manner in which and by whom preliminary proceedings
were commenced was by resolution of application by this
Board as stated above. .,.
b. The territory to be annexed has been designated DA 89-21
by the Local Agency Formation Commission, and the
exterior boundaries of such territory are as hereinafter
described.
"
TH/jm/CRO6-446wp51(1-3-90)
Book # k . Page # /7'1
. . 1489
. The territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited, and
,'- c.
\ will be benefited by such annexation as described in
Health and safety Code Section 4830.
d. The reasons for the proposed annexation as set forth in
the resolution of application referred to above are:
1. The District is empowered' to and is engaged in
furnishing sewage disposal facilities.
2. The territory proposed to be annexed to said
District is developed and/or proposed to be
developed and used for residential and/or commercial
purposes and provision for sewage disposal
facilities for said territory is essential for such
purposes.
e. The terms and conditions of the proposed annexation are:
Payment of annexation and State Board fees.
f. All the owners of land within such territory have given
their written consent to such annexation, as provided in
Government Code, section 56837; and therefore, as
approved and authorized by the Local Agency Formation
. Commission, this Board may adopt its re~olution ordering
the annexation without notice and hearing and without an
--. "\ election, as provided in Government Code, section 57002.
I
g. The regular County assessment role will be utilized and
the affected territory will be taxed for existing bonded
indebtedness.
h. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15074
(California Environmental Quality Act of 1970), the Board
finds that this. project would not have an effect on the
environment.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that pursuant to Government
Code Section 57002, the following described incorporated territory
in the City of Encinitas, State of California, be and it hereby is
annexed to and made a part of the Cardiff Sanitation District.
.,.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Board ilnmediately
transmit a certified copy of this resolution along with a
\ remittance to cover the fees required by the Government Code
TH/jm/CRO6-446wp52(1-3-90)
6L fJb
Book # . pa.ge #
. . . 1490
'
. section 54902.5 to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency
-"
Formation Commission of San Diego County, so that the Executive
Officer may make the filings required by Chapter 8 (commencing with
section 57200), Part 5, Division 1, Title 6 of the Government Code
and by Chapter 8 (commencing with section 54900), Part 1, Division
2, Title 5 of the Government Code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 1990, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Gaines, Hano, Omsted, Shea, Slater
NAYS: NOne
.
ABSENT: None
") ABSTAIN: None
" .
.
ATTEST:
the Board " E. Jane P~oJ. CI~rk - of the Board of Djrectors
of .the. CardIff Sanitation District of Encinitas.
Cal!fornla do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury that the a.~\~ve ~nd foregoing is a true
~nd corre?t cOPY\.'~l JljJs~:.- document on file
In my offlce'_c'f~>wttrle'S6,,:,reof I have set
~y .hand and, Jli~Se /of' ~:Cardiff Sanitation
DistriCt ' ~ - w ~ ~
!j-t!tOi-- --- , -< .~ 19.£L
, - .
TH/jm/CRO6-446wp53(1-3-90)
Book # ~ . Page # /lC
c
. . .
. 1491 '
.
.
DA89- 22
~MAR TY MONTGOMER Y ANNEXATION" TO THE I
CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
All that portion of Blocks 81 and 81A and a portion of adjacent streets in the Colony of
Olivenhain, in the County of San Diego, State of California. according to Map thereof No.
326, filed in the County Recorder's Office of San Diego County, July 8, 1885, lying within
the following described boundaries:
Beginning at the intersection of the center line of 12th Street with the center line of "A"
Street, as shown on said Map No. 326;
1. Thence south 72°57'35" cast, 177.91 feet (record - south 73~8'29" east) along the
center line of said 12th Street, to the southwesterly corner of land described in deed
to Robert L. Anderson, et UX, by File Page 653458, recorded on November 23, 1987,
in official records of said county. being also the true point of beginning;
2. Thence north 15°13'15" east along the northwesterly line of said land to the center
line of Road Survey No. 454.A (Rancho Santa Fe Road), map on file in the County
Engineer's Office of said county;
3. Thence southeasterly along said center line to the southeasterly prolongation of the
center line of said 12th Street, being also the northerly boundary of Cardiff
Sanitation District as established by their Resolution No. 87-24, adopted JuneJ, 1987;
4. Then~ north 72°57'35" wèst. 641.86 feet along said prolongation and center line to
the true point of beginning.
-,-
Approved by the local Agency Formation
Commission of San DieBO
DEC - 4 1989
ih:cg
LAFCO ~~~
12/14/89
Exhibit A
Page 1 of I
. ~ . .
..
OLIVENHA IN
~
E. C N ITAs !$I.//. .
LAf'CO :
EXIs'r. DIS't'. 72)
ßQUND.
nOUND. ~~ -Ç9~nøY- ~prAfÞA::r
. . .
"I '
. . . .
: . .
. 1492
,
I
I
!
,
..~
i
:
Approved by the Local Agency Formation
Commission of San Diego
DEC - 4 1989
~f% J!.-.. .",
MAP 326 - CCLONY CLIVENHAIN
Book # ¿;¿ . Page # /7J i
I
I
.E: 10-13-89 MAPPING DIVISION L.AFCO: DA 89-22 ~
" I
CALE: I" = 200' SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE AREA: 3.88 AC. I
I
.RA PAGE: 65- D II MARTY' MONTGOMERY ANNEXATION- 8/1..: 264 -142-08 I
TO
DRAWN BY: V. KOSMICKI CARDI FF SANlTATION DISTRICT THoMAS BROS: 2S D-4 I
....-- -----"""'--'" --.. ... --..-- ,
r. ",
" t
, Date: ~". L~ .
Name ~ k,o ~
Address ,~o 51fM)~~ . ClUI.SÞb
As the proponent(s) for this annexation of property identified
as 2...b 4 - +2 - 01 to the ~~but:P :SA"" '~'f1ÐIÙ
Assessor's Parcel NUmber(s)
District, I understand and agree that annexing into the District does
not guarantee sewer service or commit sewer capacity to the subject
property being annexed. Also, the District by accepting the application
does not represent that it will provide any treatment plant expansions
or sewer line extension to provide capacity or service for the subject
area to be annexed. Acceptance of this application and final annexation
of the property only allows the property to be served at such time as
the owner (s) of the annexed property pay all necessary costs for the
sewerage facilities which can transport, treat and dispose of the
wastewater generated by the property. This may mean the proponent ( s)
shall pay for a part or all of the required facilities to serve the
property.
-'
Signatur~~ A~cant
BO/04/MS3-217wp5 (1-17-89-3)
, ,.. .
..
City of
Encbulas
MAY 30, 1989
Local Agency Formation Commission
1600 Pacific Highway
San Diego, CA 92101
Dear LAFCO Members:
Subj e.ct: Annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District
Peti tion of: rYb..r~ ('(\Dr\"~crne..r.j
Notice is hereby' given of intention to annex territory to the
Cardiff Sanitation District.
The annexation is proposed under the provisions of the of the
Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act - Section
56000 et seq., Government Code.
Please find the following items enclosed:
1. LAFCO processing fee.
2. Original LAFCO questionnaire/application.
3. A certified resolution of application.
4. Property owner consent form.
5. A legal description (Exhibit A].
6. A reproducible map and (10) prints of the specific
boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed.
7. Two (2) copies of a general vicinity map.
8. Environmental Impact Document.
Notice, process and other communications regarding said
annexation may be directed to the proponents at:
City of Encinitas
Dept. of Public Works
527 Encinitas Blvd.
Encinitas, CA., 92024
Attn: Tom Henie
Sincerely,
j~~~
Tom Henie
utilities Planner
~/'l) 9~r-S-éJ71
,
~~: Enciniu.' BnldtT;1f(1. Enein;¡",. ClIlf", 11I;i <)2()2.í ()JI).<).i.4.:;n;o
( . .
:.¡
\
"
'~--..I,,-
" ,.
.
. . ~_.- . S 'Local Agency Form:ltion .mis~ion . Date t)6-C., 'Z"Z, 14 ~
1600 Pacific Highway. R 452
. San Diego. CA 92101
Telephone: (619) 531-5400
--.---..-....'-.. CHA'NGE OF ORGANIZA TI6N/REORG-ANIZATÏÖr'~-APpLicA TIÖN Q;~~.~~-~NAI;~ -.-"'- .
I. This questionnaire may be used for the following changes of government organization: city and
special district annexations and detachments, or a combination thereof, ref erred to as a
reorganization. .... ... H...n .'.n .... n" ., '-' -..
..- -..". -,.....
Agency Change of Organiz:1tion
c.A~~\'F-f- 6 A+J \ì~ìIO,J t:>\E.ìR\Cì h\SìrtlC¡- Æ:1JiJi::XAì/o,J OF
"T'?M 't! <f!7 -/ Dtg
A. The following items must be submitted with this application:-
1. A certified resolution OR a petition of landowners/registered voters making appli-
. .
ca tlon.
a. If initiated by resolution, submit property owner consent form.
2. 1 copy of a metes-and-bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject area.
3. A reproducible plat map and 10 prints.
4. 2 copies of a vicinity map of the subject territory.
. 5. Environme~1tal documents:
a. Negative Declaration: If an ND has been prepared for this project, submit 1
copy of the ND, Initial Study, and resolution certifying the ND.
.. "_'
b. Environmental Impact. Report: If an EIR has been prepared for this project,
" - submit 15 copies of the certified EIR. Only 1 copy of the EIR appendix is
required. Also submit a copy of the resolution certifying the ErR.
c. If no environmental review has been conducted, submit a completed Initiai
Study form.
6. If the proposal includes annexation to a c-.ity, submit I copy of the city resolution
approving the prezoning and general plan land use designations for the subject
territory. .
7. LAFCO processing fee (refer to fee schedule).
B. Additional information pertaining to the f:¡ctors LAFCO must consider may be requested
during LAFCO staff's review of the proposal.
(7/07/87)
I
-
~.
.' 0,0
,
This application must be completed in consu1tntlon with city or district star! and si¡:ned ou by
that cont:1ct person. All questions must be :1nswered (use N/ A if Dot applicable).
-"- .-.-.-.--- .- .""'" ... ..,. ..." .. -... .. .. .......- _. ..' .n- . ....
II. PESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICA TTON
A. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
.. . Is the subject territory to be developed at this time?
1.
ýt:;!::>
2. If yes, generally describe the anticipated development (buildin!; types, facilities,
number of units). +
S~IVb,L.~ ~HI~~ ~VJ~UJ #G¡5 ofJ ~ U>II-ÞI~~ I.-Ø"t.s.
Please indicate below ill discretionary permits or approvals from a city or the County which
will be needed to complete the project and the projected approval date. If already granted,
please indicate the date of approval and submit copy of resolution .of approval.
Is Resol u tion
Project Date of of Approval
A oorova 1 File No. A oorova 1 Attached?
-... .. - .....
City or County Plan Amendment
Prezoning (City)
- -
Rezone (County)
Tentative Subdivision Map
Tentative Parcel Map 57 &¥=j rL/~ /11'7 '(tÇ~
Major Use Permit
. Other
3. If no development. is. planned at this time, will approval of ~he proposed jurisdic-
tional change increase the development potential of the property?
~ (If so, please indicate in terms of allowable uses, and number of units.)
4. If development is not planned at this time, when is development or the ar-::a al~¡ici-
pated? ~-
. ..-. .. . . . . .. ... d' .. dO . 'OO"'.O:"'-"""'~"""~,:~,:""".~".-,,:,.',..,
. '
., .
' I .
"
* S. In:ls much detail :lS possible. please explain why this propos:l1 is necessary at this
time (c.g.. an approved development or an existing structure requires service not
currently provided or available).
0,,-, t:>Þc... Ii J I tt '67 A~vA .... ð~ A- 4- LOí ì~~ì/U6 t:>.4.e~b L. NI/P
W A-;. I--<~t>t ø;j S1i-ID ~ROç:.ß.tì'< . D£.Vt--LOP~I6+.IT (),L 'N/c.:> ~~II!'~y ~
"~~L.E. f'-ItH.1 , L. '(' t>W~LLI""'~-S W.lU- çqç ~ ¡) 112.£ ~.eVIC~ IoJOì c..t.9RR~¡VtL'( ?lC,ùVIbz5¡)
~'( A 66wM t1l6ÌJtlC-I, Ìlf~ Cft'" 0" ~("/pr"1'"1f-S bo£s ¡....JoT L.OOI.L.. )C.1f,uor21f81.'r
Of\) S bÞ'\l c.. S &l2.Vic- If. I'ó It Þ~V'\G~ It&.- ì"-.A..#J/Ft-/ v£:.
B. GENERA L TNFORMA TTON
* 1. Please describe the general location and physical features of the territory which is
the subject of this proposal. Refer to major highways, roads, watercour~es, and
topographical features.
Tt\t p~C\~~'\"( 15 t-Ol.A"t"~ OfV,I\ R.ßl.-Iri/ub&.-1.{ f't..1fr F>~~{Æ;I-
,JiQU fJþ$..t> B'( ~.vœo 6A-tJtf>, ¡:::.€:... RPA-S> 'T'O 'ni.E. ,:) Oft"t~ØAt> ì I ~\J~ ~66 t>II¥1~
-,.,0.. 'r14~ ~:rr J ~ ~ fJLoV OL/V&ÑI4.,."..; 1+ I u..,s ~ ~ \ 't>bNTï Jk. ~ "ISLÞF¥-t6,vf' TO
~ 5 el.t"'t14-. H~"tLl~ ìl(~ &.-,~~ )-OI-t&... ,volt )-~~ì 1--, foJk. ,<fL"f-JI1 RlWŒO ~I'INtIf
F~ Rt>. A I-A1I.1té. ø~oV~ MA-II-' R\.J J~ !tL-o,vc., "t¡f1S ~ìl~ SOI"'~~L'( L.-J"",s, ø(:.. 'T~lf
P1\.o P6A. 'r( . 6',00 f=1à.~T P~OM -rH-~ p /lO~",Q't'(.
* 2. How many acres of territory are included in this proposal? 2.75' x
* 3. How many people live within the subject territory? 0 x.
* 4. How many registered voters live within the subject territory? () x.
C. LAND USE INFORMATION
For County general plan and zoning information call 565-5981. If subject area is within
a city, call that city's planning department..
-..., *. -
1. County -
... -..'
. .
a. Is the territory within a county community planning area? X':.
If so, which one? -.- . --..--
b. What is the County General Plan or- community planning area designation?
. x.
c. Wh:!t is the existing County zoning? x.
* 2. City
- .
a. Is the territory within a city general pl:ln area? ý'-s
If so, which city? S1JC-\ ~1"rA-S
b. What is the: city's land-use designation? R-,&,., ~lAL 2..
c. H:ls :lny city zoned or prezoned the territory? '(l~
If so, which city? 6)( \ ¡.)rT~'"
d. How is the territOry zoned Or prezoned? R\è. -"Z... ( I/-z.. A-a6 LtrrJ
3
'."""",,'\"'~':":~"":'I\~~.¡~"".,~. '^"'. . '. """"""""'.'I"-\'~",'rt
f"'1:~""'; .'. " " ' :,;.',: .
l':. " .,'
! '* 3. How is tl. (erritory presently used (e.g., vacanL; groves; 3 single-family residences,
. etcH Please be specific as to structures, improvements, facilities now on property.
'. ., ,.., ~ E<. ~ "'" t¡ I ~14~~ A#c \2.. \ ~ II<.ICI. ~ 11<.1,\
.
\
I
I * 4. How are adjacent lands usc4?
North: R6& \ 1>~""r1 \.L... .
)
1
I East: "-'"-£, I t:>6t-J'rI~L
,
South: ~\ þ~,útIAL
West: ~&I't>~11+L
'* 5. Docs any portion of the subject territory contain any of the following:
Agricultural Land Uses Flood Con trol Channel
Agricultural Preserve River or Creek
Scenic corridor zone 1 DO-year flood line
Open Space Easement Coastal bluff
Airport noise contour Archaeo logicaljhistor ical
Coastal permit zone features
Sewer Mora torium area Other unusual features
Slopes greater than 25% (specify)
Mature Trees )(
~
III. PUBLIC SER VICES INVENTOR Y
A. SEWAGE DISPOSAL
1. Public Sewer System
-
a. Is the subject territory within a district or ëity that provides public sewer
service? No . If so, what agency? N/A
- .__.- ._. b. Is annexation for sewer service necessary? Yes
.. ._-_. (If No, skip to Question # 2 (Septic System)). If yes, what district or city?
*
--'- - --- . - -,..-' - ,- _.
* c. What is the distance for connection to the agency(ies) existing sewer system?
.-- .. -
d. Has the affected agency issued a letter of sewer avail:1bility? N/A
If ycs, provide a copy of the letter with your application.
) c. Will the agency be prepared to furnish service immediately? If not, explain.
Yes
No
f. Is the territory in a sewer moratorium area?
4
/
. '~~""".:'r~"",',',:-",-'r',' c~.- -".;-, ':-""~';':""'~...;.-t...,...
,1: , [e., b de d'"
" No
g. s the subject territory to e annexe to an Improvement ¡striCt.
, .
* h. Specify any improvements (on and off site) that will be necessary to connect
and serve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of these
improvements and nftthod of financing (e.g., general property tax. assessment
district, landowner or develol?çr fees), Lo,.......,obc-~l.0~ 'TO t:.'1-I~'tI"""ú, S6..w"-~ /-i1."J
6". (10 C.é. £.1'" ~Ilð~ 't'KG- .soVtH~ ~r 1"ItO\,>I>It't"I' I'\f-'þ ~v¡~ '10 4- ~o~ w/t./"'-
ßIL f..\IJltfoJU!> \!.'( "t'u t:>'- \l6L-O¡:'~R. .
1. Capacity of Treatment Facility:
(I) What is the physical design capacity of the sewage treatment plant which
will serve the annex:ltion area? ~. Ç' MGD. .
(2) What is the current average daily sewage treatment volume of wastewater
being treated at the plant? ¡/.I}/zIE 5'" MGD.
(3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity to service the
terri tory? Yes , If not, what plan does the agency have to
' increase its capacity?
J. Capacity of Transmission Lines:
(1) What is the physical design capacity of the affected sewer main (trans-
mission line or pipeline) which conveys wastewater to the trea~ment
facility? Varies MGD. Adequate capacity for this proJec .
..-, -- -." " ._,
(2) What is the current loading rate of the sewer main? Varies MGD.
(3) Does the affected agency currently havë.sufficient capacity in its sewer
main to serve the territory? Yes . If not. what plan does the agency
have to increase its capacity?
k. Capacity of Outiall Lines:
(I) What is the physical design. capacity of the affected outfall line which
conveys treated effluent to the ocean or ocean outfan system? VariesMGD.
Adequate capacity for this project.
(2) What is the current loading rate of the outfall line? Va ri es MGD.
(3) Does the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity in the outfall
line to serve the territory? Yp<; If not. what plan does the
agency have to increase its capacity?
5
I
! ~......~,-~.,~,...::,....,... '.'., . ". .. ..'" '. :' ~.,"--,' "¡""1>1'\"r;\'rp"~""("1,"':v':"'. . -:-""¡"'("""""':-~~::-~:"t"'J7'~'"
. . '. ' "',' f.'
, 2. Septic Sys,
* ' a. Is a septic system(s) currently used on the property? ~ .
* b. Will septic system be used upon annexation and development of the property?
¡JO J;'
* c. If 2.b. is 3nswered yes, please ~nswer the following:
(I) Have percol:1tion tests been conducted?
" (2) Dept. of Public Health 3pproval?
B. WATER SUPPLY
1. Is the subject territory within a district or city that provides water service? ~)
a. If so, what district or city? OL\v6fv'M,JJ /,,\utJl(..\?rtL- WffrH "'I<;~ICT.
2. Is annexation for water service necessary? JJo
a. If so, what district or city? ----
3. Is the agency prepared to immediately furnish the necessary service? 'ff::S
If not, explain.
4. Is water service curren tl y provided to the territory? ݣs
a. If so, what is the current water demand? MGD
"
(I) For what purpose?
'.. Y£5
5. Will the project be connected to an existing water lin¿?
.. a. Distance to tie-in IS.DO ~
b. When will service be extended to territory? I/I/ßq
c. The. total anticipated watt! demand will be:
(1) Residential use MGD.
(2) Industrial/Commercial use MGD.
,
.,. ' (3) Agricultural use MGD.
-
6. Is the subject territory to be annexed to an improvement district? ~O
a. If so. which one(s)? -
7. Specify any improvements (on and off site) that will be necessary to connect and
I serve the anticip:lted development. Indicate the total cost of these improvements
) and method of finJncing (e.g., general property tax, assessment district, landowner
or developer fees). tWo!) A-c.c.'-b ~ þtt.\u"-~ \,IV ~L~ ~~ c.o¡<Jn-fvc"t'JS:,þ f"¡(,.,¡C.o1
.,
ìW-o L'H-!'1- '11 0 r-6 ð¡V RA-tJc.~ st'trJrf+ F-i>. Rt>. "to s /'t\!> F>~ 0 f'06.,pt,¡,. TH-6. ~";{o.' ~ Of:
I 6
~ b~\V6. WILl..- ~~ Al='r~, 300.
. -------" . ~n:-;-~_~_-:,-----~.-,-,,--:,.,,~,,"",":..r\':~:.
' . "'
. .
" , . .
.'
C. FIRE PROTECTION
1. Is the territory currently within a fire district or city? ~')
a. If so, which one? êt>vv tJ'V'tt¥, F-\..e.~ P ¡Q. t)ìÞc. ì- t f),J t>t~'U'It':'r.
",
2. If not, is annexation for fire protcct,ion part of this application? --.-
3. Is structural fire protection necessary? Y65) 5 P 12 I ,..N, L../:; f...S /"; HolJS~.
4. Location of nearest fire station: i//L41*'é 1'1t~
a. Estimated response time: S ,... ,..; (Priority)
201tlJ,N (Non-priority)
D. POLICE PROTECTION
1. What police agency currently serves this territory? C Cv1J,"",,\ .s~ E>(L!?If-F
a. Loca tion of nearest police station? 2. rMltF-S-
b. Esti ma ted response time: ~þ-7 I IV (Priority)
~ #vt ~~.,¡ (N on-priority)
2. What police agency would serve this territory if this jurisdictional change IS
approved? CÐ v,..,""'-( -s-H 6ï<\F~ ( 6,4M6. ~ ~80L1tS)
a. Location of nearest police station?
b. Estimated response time: ~/IÝ (Pr!.ority)
'20,.,.., Iv (Non-priori ty)
E. SCHOOLS
1. Will development on the territory generate any school-age children? y'.s.S
How many:
a. Grades K - 6 6
b. Grades 7 - 9 3
c. Grades 10 - 12 3
2. What school district(s) is thc subject tcrritory within? .5A~ !>1~\J\ìO U,v10/J 1-l1é¡,L}
£r-'c...I""~~ bL6.I'-(6/J't-(J, 2'1'
3. Arc any cIemcnt:l.ry or secondary schools serving the subject tcrri tory operating
above design capacity? ~O If so, which schools?
7
. ' ... ,,-'.'!"t' . ":"/.".r.",:~:.,~', -#(.. ¡~,~~,~,:",",~"".:::.,.~..
.
F. FLOOD CONTR\......
1. Describe the major drainage area within which the subject territory is located:
*;'
I 2. Are there existing flood control facilities on thc territory? Yß5
!
I I f so, describe. F-Ac- \ L. rn is
! 1 M"~V't.o;> Þ~AIIJA"'t. AL-()fJ~ 5Dù"\~LI~ y¡u~
c9=-- ç:>¡:z.ot"'"~"'< \.UIL..~ co V~O\... \){LA".)I'\G.~ of t>A..Ð Ø.. tn.'-(.
!
I
3. If this territory is annexed to a city, has the ci ty planned for improvements to
provide for flood control in the area (on or off site)? ~O.
G. TRANSPORTATION
1. Designate the names and types of roads which the project will use for primary and
secondary access (include direct access streets from the project site to the nearest
freeway):
Street Name TYDe (Right of Way Width) Current level of Service
~JC\l'Jc\W 5lttJìA ;=..& ~'b. 60 ,...0&£" SéLOfJt>,o.~" GO t-tML)ì'6~ eù~.!)
2. Is widening of an existing street necessary? ~O
-..
3. Is the project served by County-maintained roads? Ý.£S .
,-,
4. Is construction of new access streets necessary? YibS..
.
5. What is the distance to the nearest shopping center? -L miles.
6. Is public transportation available? Y6S. How distant? 1/4 miles.
TV. SPHER E OF INFLUENCE
A. Is the territory to be annexed or reorganized located within the sphere of influence of
the city/district to which it is proposed to be annexed? ýb~
B. Will a sphere of influence amendment for any affected agency be required? fJO
Which agcncy(ies)?
8
'. ' ... --. '--;"
'.
, '. .
.. . .
V. SPECIAL REVENUES. ANNEXING CITY OR DISTRICT MUST COMPLETE THIS SECTION
A. Does the city/district have current plans to establish any new assessment districts which
would include this area, in order to pay for new or extendeJ services? Please detail.
",
No
.
D. Docs t he a ff eeted territory contain existing commercial activities which generate ten
million dollars per year or more in retail sales? No
C. Will the area assume any existing bonded indebtedness upon annexation to city/district?
Please explain, and indicate taxpayer cost.
Any existing bonded bebt becones the liability of the property owner after
annexation.
D. Will the territory be subject to any new or additional special taxes. benefit charges, or
fees? Please outline.
Annual sewer service charge after connection to the public sewer system.
E. Which service(s) to be provided to the annexing area by your city/district are presently
being provided by another local agency? (please list each service and current provider).
None
F. Is the city/district requesting an exchange of property tax revenues as the result of this
proposal? No
" , -';'.;
G. Is a master property tax exchange agreement applicable to this jurisdictional change?
No .°
H. If property tax exchange negotiations are necessary, upon receipt of this application all
affected agencies will be notified of this proposal and provided preliminary information to
begin the negotiation process.
,'. -
~ vdk- ~
-J ~
City/District Representative Ijrle
(signature) '14 -S"D'7~
Phone Number
9
, . ," ". ';~~~~"'~"':""'~"':i;';.IC':- ,
, '.
VI. PUI3LTC CONT -
.:.,
A. List, all agencies. groups. and individuals contacted regarding this proposal. . -,.
None
.I,
* LAFCO will consider the person signing this application below as the proponent of the: proposed
action(s). . Notice and other communications regarding this application (including fee: payment) will
be directed to the proponent.
vm~ ~? ~
Signature:
Da te: l7.-h...!-9'9
,
Print or Type
Name: fv1 A- ~ 'ì"\' He¡V¡-fo,OM,s.~.,.
Represen ting: ~o~6~, AfJ't>I;~!:.orJ
Address: .'=> I '2 '-"11+ 1>l ~ Vt'lu...~ "/00
6C>I-ANA- ~i>AC~ . oc:1. q-z-o,'S'"
Phone No. (",~) 7q~- b/oO
, -
* If you wish anyone other than the proponent of this application to receive notices and reports of
these proceedi?gs. ple:ase include here: .
,." .
Name:
. ,..
. . - _., - .. . -- - - '.' ,,- - . ... ...' - .,
.. -
Address:
(7/07/87)
10
. .
RESOLUTION NO. 89-09
RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
MARTY MONTGOMERY ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has received a request from
Marty Montgomery that the hereinafter described territory to be
annexed to the Cardiff Sanitation District (hereinafter referred
to as the Sanitation District); and
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to initiate
proceedings to annex said territory to the Sanitation District;
BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED as follows:
1. Pursuant to Government Code sections 56800 and 56700,
application is hereby made to the Local Agency Formation
Commission of the County of San Diego for a proposed
change of organization as follows:
¡ A. This proposal is made pursuant to the cortese-Knox
Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (S.
56000, et. seq., Govt. Code).
B. The nature of the proposed change of organization
and the names of all districts for which any such
change of organization is proposed as follows: The
annexation of the hereinafter described territory
to the Sanitation District.
C. The names of all other affected counties, cities and
districts are: city of Encinitas.
D. A description of the exterior boundaries of the
territory proposed to be annexed to the Sanitation
District is described in Exhibit "A" hereto
attached.
E. Said territory is uninhabited and comprises
approximately 3.11 acres.
F. It is proposed that said territory be annexed
subject to the following condition: Payment of
district annexation and State Board fees.
of TH/O4/CRO4-270WP5 (4-3-89)
r"YJ \< /:I ;;; . Pago ;:
. .
G. All the owners of land within such territory have
given their written consent to such annexation
subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions.
H. The reasons for this proposal are as follows:
( 1) The Sanitation District is empowered to and is
engaged in furnishing sewage disposal
facilities.
(2) The territory proposed to be annexed to said
District is developed and/or proposed to be
developed and used for residential and/or
commercial purposes and provision for sewerage
disposal facilities for said territory is
essential for such purposes.
I. It is hereby requested that proceedings be taken for
the annexation of territory as hereinabove proposed.
J. This annexation is consistent with the sphere of
influence of the Sanitation District.
2. pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15303
(California Environmental Quality Act of 1970), the Board
finds that this annexation is not subject to the
\, environmental impact evaluation process because it is
.,. categorically exempt.
,..
3. The Clerk of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized
and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution
with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of the County of San Diego.
,¡¡C TH/O4/CRO4-270WP5 (4-3-89)
I
Book t/ ~ . Page t/ l/2
. .
\ PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of April, 1989, by the
I
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Gaines, Hano, Omsted, Shea, Slater
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
~Ct ~
P mela Slater, Chairman of the Board
Cardiff sanitation District
E. of the Board
I, E. H,,': F'OOL, Clerk of the Board of Directors
of t~~'. ;,,;,'_~diff Sanitation District. Enclnltas,
'~ CalifJrnia do hereby certify that the above and
J fo:-egoing IS a true and correct copy of the
original of this document on fne In my office,
In witness whereof I have set my hand and the
seal of the Cardiff Sanitation District this JJ!l
jAt~ . 19 .,'
()
- -" jA/1~
~~ . :; ,)f the f3("".-I
TH/04/CRO4-270WP5 (4-3-89)
Book It ~ . p ~ 43
age tt
1'. "
< . I Board at Direc~~
- .
TO:
(" A ~ ~ ~(:..F- ~ !1¡Ù\"tA-ì\o,J District
The under::;igned property owner:J in the vicinity of Ol..lu/-¡..J't4AlrJ
respectfully request and consent to the commencement of proceeding for
t."le annexation of the property described opposite our names to the
-
CA~\),FP SA-~ \.ìA-'ì1'D~ District and further consent to this
annexation subjec"t to any and all regulations, fees, and/or charges
established under the prov is ions of existing cJ'l1l<?þ"c::r=- 5J4 tV ) 't- t/--r- ION
District ordinances.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED
state Lot, Block, Subdivision's name
Please Sign and Map No. or Section, Tmfllsh.:.p and ASSESSOR'S
DATE NAME Þ.ND ADDRESS Rancre' or Address of Pro'Oertv PARCEL NO.
I ":./n./t¡ 9 b"Z ~";c\J() ~,:,¡.,~ F-f.. ~'C>,) OI-4\,;",vHM¡.oJ,cM. PN 264-142'
~AI~- ~~ ?"'IR.¡-l~þ..) &of- u-,.... ~, ,4 ¡J1\ i'1-A IN 't-...~ ('01.-0,)1.( of "'-11/6"; WI'! """ , I"; 'rfJ,i: c::Ju,&.Jr't'
HAP ï~~.:z6.0~ J.I(), 1,2
~~ ~, OOhllYl tJ!- ~^,k>I6.(. 0 rÐI I¡.jt'"",: ~./t....'( 'I, 1~~S, A,V~ ~~J4.i ~'t'to-.J ~r- ~...I'~~/f:C~ J4.!:>:ro'w/¡v) ";701115
.
L(7T' 4;"1 \" t..""vr.. '!3¡::-"v..Jl,,/:"'; t..\):r~ o('¡*~ '\"l-A «,A\'t> 5'H2cS.!-T} ~/.v'"
~"T-<;.JL"'t.<. .)f'. ~~ ...."""'- ;..,.,e'ï10"", "F-' '2 ",""",
.¡r'tc.~~ r4.J'::> c.~ó ..þ
" ,. .$JIW\:),6úD ~ c.OrfCti>þ ccT 3'" /p
SIGNATURE: ~ ~7 DATE: 12-/z'-,l<:79
(j
*If property is in escrow, please note the approximate date of
completion of escrow.
Please retu~ petition to: ~(q.1' -i- œ¡O.-"iIJJlJ~ :
-" " e:I<'£k~I J", -r>t<SICIS- ,:\?"", '\"10'- .sc(,)'rlf"~ L. '( 15"0. DO ;<4"1' DC 'TN.
city of Encinit.3.s """ ;..t..t~<tL.\ 1,,7,'f'l "'oS';,.. co:. ßL.('e,IL 'f'I, 0'" '1'Hi>. (OLÞI-J'( .': o~v6(\J!f1
Departillent of Public Works 11V"i~ 'Ol/tl.I't~ Of- s,.¡,u b'~.C :S'7~'1'!. 0" tJf.L.,I=OI.~.n>1 ACO/)Rt)"",,¡ 'TC'"
527 Encinitas Boulevard ,..~""," ¡.;o. 32~ J I'lL-\!!\> ".) 'tt+6. """«(1£ OF- 't'~ cov.....~'t ¡:,å (eel>
Encinit.3.s, California 92024 "... .!.,j."; 'r)< 1';(,0 CCI..""'\"'j ¡ ",\.'L.'{ ~I b'/'~T J 'J":) 1.,"- ""¡"t ~/ïH '1'MI\-¡ ~
Tom Henie ¥ " I"tI.~I..() ...'l..,.rn CtJ
Attn: øo<: i\ ~T, /...'11""'- ,)<i.>uìW';,¿J..'{ Dr'- ,..~.. vJ6 \,'1'it."L-'1
PI-I;" ...'ðj1Tlli;l\...'( LI,'-C:: oJ ~ ";11.. .'1\)1.."1' H r. R L. 'i /5'0, JO ,"-';"" 0"" ,~"
T~lp...phon~ (6:' ']) <) ~ ,\ - 507 '3 131..0<:"-, ~'t:J .~II",T O';I~(' I..'rl(rHo;1) ~",'t> CLO,"";!) ~ ?"~"'Ii..>
OO/O,\/H:3J-2 1. 7\Jr:j (1.-1.--~;<J-J)
. . .
. -
LEGAL DESCRt PTI ON
87-108-TPM CI1'Y OF ENCtNlT AS
APN 164-142-01
. -
That portion of Lots 81 and 81-A, in THE COLONY OF OLIYENHAIN, in the .
County of San Diego, State of California, accordin,g to Map thereof No. 326, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July
8, 1885, and that portion of ItA" Street adjoining the Westerly line Lot 81
and that port i on of IIB" Street lyi ng between Lot s 81 and 81-A, (sa i d
streets being vacated and closed to public use) lying Southwesterly of the
center line of the County Road described in Deed to the County of San
Diego, recorded October 29, 1938 in Book 1817, Page 326 of Deeds and known
as Rancho Santa Fe Road.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Southerly 150.00 feet of the Westerly 137.89 feet
of Block 81, of THE COLONY OF OLIVENHAIN, in the County of San Diego,
State of California, according to Map thereof No. 326, filed in the Office
of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 8, 1885, together with
that portion of "A" Street lying Southerly of the Westerly prolongation of
the Northerly line of the Southerly 150.00 feet of said Block, said street
being vacated and closed to public use.
.
~ ' /""t?
174. 7S
@
I SHT, 1
'/"',;" I
I POR~ J
I BL~'\. E1\
/ @
'0 '4- ,.v, 37
I
5,::e AC. ':, NS ,N', '2'¡'
f5 I :""
¡ Ei
~
í) SHT,2
@
NJ!W,'PI (,'1- /" If ) ~
.
---
I
. .
.--.-
"
---
- - ,
"
"
... "
~ "
'-
,, "
...
'\ '-
"
\ ...
" '- \.
'- .... \
'\ \.. I
'- TO/~L ACREASE I
"
I 1
I
I
\.
"
" ,
"
/
'\ !
I " ~17.5""'---- /
\..
I ....
" '-
" ....
--
..... " , ,.
-
,, '- ..--
--- - - -
- - " "
... '- '- '-
-- '- ..... '
-- - - - -
.....
-
- -----
--
'-
'-
fbrcel 4 - -
- -
O. jj:/Ac (;.,-r;55
~ O.7~
\r\ "" /
I\¡ ,
. I\J \J ft:{rce/ 2. I
~ û.('9r Ac Gross
Û, ~ÇrAc Neil
I \
I ~
I
/
I / ~' \
~f;""'<' / I \( J?~s/r.. - - -
\ / /. :;;...1'> \ ~ \ \.rropo5ed £4' wld~ 'pr/vo 7'e / ("ðVd-- - -
I and uf/f¡'!y eQ.5emenr -:-; . - - -
\.~-'J;J°'~ ---- \I/)c'r \ -::_~ 7~9/~ " II
-r -~ 0 / - -
-------. -_.h .' ._u -5.70' r I..lÚsl¡nl7 .'jf'Wpr rM'.',r" ;...
DATE: LAFCO: >--
5 12/89 PLAT MAP
SCALE: AREl\:
I MARTY MONTGOMERY ANNEXATION 2. 75 AC
, EXIST - DIST. A.P.N.
BOUND. TO 264-142-01
ILl 'IIOMAS BROS:
< CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
nrìTl!\)n .
. .
~
str E
Q OLIVENHAIN
~
~
~
~ L CAmINO Oe.t,
~
~
~
, ~
~
ENCIN ITAs
DlI.TE: LlI.FCO:
5/12/89 VICINITY MAP
SCALE: MU::^:
MARTY MONTGOMERY ANNEXATION 11.. P. N.
EXIST. DIST.
ßOUND. TO 264-142-01
'11()M^:; ß RO:~ :
nOUN I) - CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT pg 25 D-4
-
. .
- . .
AW Ð'\D IX I
Th " r Ia\"1lE'\T JJ... ŒEŒL 1 S'T 'f"(P.M ì
(To Be Ccrnpleted By Lead Agency)'
I. ~ ì:p-o und
1. Name of proponent R.E. Anderson
2. Address and Phone Number of proponent ~Rancho Santa Fe RoAn
Encinitas, CA 92024.
'3. Date of Checklist Sutmi tted 10/2/87
.4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Encinitas
5. Name of proposal, if applicable Tentative Parcel Map for four lots
II. En V i ro DID'" Jl ta 1 1 mpa.c t s
--.' ' -.
.. . (E:r.pla...T1a. tions of a.ll "yeslt and "rna.ybelt answers are required on attached
sheBt:; .)
Yes }tZyœ No
- -
1. &..rth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures? - ~
b. Dis::-uptions, displacenents, cCXDpaction or
overcovering of the soil? -L -
c. Cnange in topography or ground surface
relief feat'J..!'es? -Å-
-
d. Toe ¿estruc:ion, covering or ro:xiification
of a..."ìY u.."lÍque geologic or physical f ea tures? - _x
e. ADy increase in ~~nà or ~~ter erosion of
soils, either Oil. or off the site? X
-
f. C~"ìßes in òep:)sitioD or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, åeposi tioj) or
erosion ~~icb ~y modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the oceaû or
aDY o'o-Y, i!Üet or lake? X
- -
¡;. :::::r:p:JS'J:e of ?8Ople or proper'i:Y to geolo¡;ic
f2zarès such as earthquakes, lanåsliòes,
mudslides, grounc failure, or similar P22ards? X
- -
. . -
... Yes Maybe No
- -
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? - -*-
b. Toe creation of objectionable odors? ~
-
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
tenpera. ture, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionall)q - ..L
3. 'J a. ter. Will the proposal result in:
a.. CQa.nges in currents, or the course of di-
rection of water rnoveDents, in either marine
or fresh ~~ters? -K
-
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pa t-
terns, or the rate and a.mount of surface
runoff? X
. '...' .....'" '..' . . '" " - -
-'."-' .. ,- ., ..-...-- -- --- . ..-...., .. .' -.
. .' . c. Alterations to the course or lo~ of flood
nters? -*
-
d. 'D"...2J1ge in the a..m:>unt of surface nter in
<:.::1y ';,~ter b::xiy? - ~
e. Disc~~e into ~~rface waters, or- in 2..IJy
~lteration of surface w~ter quality, io-
eluding but not limited to t~per~~ure
. ." ..- - - ..." .. dissolved o,-.ygen or turbidity? . ..x..
-
'" Alter-ation of the direction or rate of flow
.I..
of ground~ters? X
-
g. C ' . tj -'~.t: . d ~
~ge ~n ' e q~n~l~Y 0.1. groùD ~~ers,
either t~-ough direct aDditions or -;;~th-
¿:-~-;;-a.ls or through interceptio~ of an
~quifer by cuts or- excavations? X
-
h. Substa.ntiÜ reduction in the am~unt of
~ter otbe~se ~v2.il2.ble for p~blic
~ter s-..:pplies? X
- -
, ~¡::osure of people or prop-e::-ty to -¡:;-ater re-
~.
12.tei b2..Z2.rès suc:.b 2..S fl()()j,ing or tid2.l ';,-a.ves? X
- -
, Pla.nt Life. ~ill t~e pro?O~l result i~:
...
- -
E... CJ..2..."1ge in the ë.i versi ty of speçies or nL..-c;:-
) . '.' ' ." ~~- 0'" aDV ~-es 0'" pì~n+s (in~ludin~ ~reos
...-- - - .-_..1- .I.' -"'-" ~ ~ '" ~'o" ""
s~rubs gr2Ss, crops, and aquatic pl~ts)?
.........- -
.----..'.. "'
.....,
-
. .
.
.
Yes ~ybe No
-
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants? _ ...x..
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the no~l replenish-
ment of existing species? X
- -
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
-
5. An.ima-l Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or nurn-
hers of any species of animals (birds, land
animals including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, ?enthic organi~ ~r insects)? '- L
b. Reduction of the n~b€rs of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? 'x
-
c. Introduction 'of new speci~S of'animals into,
-'.'" an area, or result in a barrier to the migra-
.- ._, . ...
tion or movement of animals? X
- -
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
h2.bit2..t? X
- -
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
2... Increases in existing noise levels? x
- -
b. Exposure of people to 'severe noise leve~s? ,.,
X
-
7. Light ~d Gl2:e. Will the proposal produce new
light or g12..re? X
- -
S. Lwd Use. Will the proý:)s¿,l result in a sub-
stanti~l alteration 0: ~be prese~t or plarwej
lwd use of ê..J."1 2.Te2-? -Å
-
9. N 2. t u... c..l Res.o u.:- c es. Will the proposal result i~:
2.. Increa.se in the rate of use of (U)Y natu:"'2.l
resources? X
-
10. ?.:.sk of Dpset. Will the propos¿,l involve:
E... A risk of an explosion or the release 0:
~~7~rdous ~~bst2.nces (including, but not
1 i;ui ted t.o oil, pesticides, cbe::D.C2..1s 0:-
r¿i.2.:¡;ion) in -che event of an a.ccident 0:-
upset conditions? X
- -
--- ----- ....
- --
n
. .
. ~ Maybe No
b. Possibl e interf erence v.1. th BJ') emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan? - ~
11. Po?~latioD. Will the propo~l alter the lo~tion,
distribution, density, or gro~~h rate of the h~n
population of an area.? - X
12. Housing. Will the proposal aifect edsting hous-
ing, or create a demand for additional housing? - JL
13. TraJ1SPOrtatio::l/Circulation. Will the proposa.l
resul t in:
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular rrovcment? - 1L
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
de-œ.nd for new pa.rking? - X-
c. . Substantial inJpa.ct upon existing transpor-
ta tiO::l systems? - L
d. Alterations to present petterns of circula-
tion or ¡rovenent of DeOple and/or go:xis? X
. -
\
e. Alte~tions to waterborne, rail or air traffic? - ~
f. Increase in traffic ha.z2rds to motor v~icles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? - ~
14. Public Services. Will the propoS2.1 h2,ve an effect
u}X)n, 0:- r~ul t in a need. for new or altered go\'-
ern:Dental services in c...ny of tbe follo'ñ"Ì.ng areas:
~. Fire protection? X
b. Police protection? X
- -
c. Schools? X
- -
è. ~r}3 or otber recreational :acilities? X
- -
e. }~iD~enance of public facilities, inclu~ing
ro~s? X
- -
:. O':her gove:-D..r:::ental se::-;ices? X
" 15. be~ b:' -¡;;ill -;:he propoS2.l resd t ir,:
\ ~. Use of substantial ~~~~ts of fuel or energy? X
.J - -
----~
.> .
.
.
. Yes Maybe No
- -
b. &JbstÂnti~l increase in demand upon existing \
sources or energy, or reqJire the development
of ne~ sources of e~e~Y? _ ......x.
16. Utilities. Will the p~~posal result in a need for
ne~ systems, or substantial alterations to the
follo~~ng utilities: _ ..x.
17. Ruman Reß.l th. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of a..ny health b2.zard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)? .x.
-
b. Exposure of people to potential health
b2..za.rds? X
-
18. . Aesthetics.' Will the proposa.l result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the pJblic, or will the proposa.l result in the
creation of an a..esthetica..lly offensiv~ site open
to pJblic vie~1., X
- -
19. Recrea.tion. Will the proposa.l result in a..n
impa..ct upon. the quality or quantity of existing
recrea..tiona..l opportunities? - L
\
20. OJl tu....-a.l P.esOUl'ces. 'I
I
é... Will the proposa.l result in the a..lteration
of or tbe destruction of a.. prehistoric or
'histo~ic archaeologica..l site? - .L
..... Will the propo~l re~Jlt in aàverse physical
u.
Dr aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic builåing, structure, or obj ect? - L
c. ~s the pro po sa. 1 have the potential to
C2.use a p.1ysical change ~ich would affect
unique e~hnic cultu~l values? L
-
d. Will the propO~l restrict existing religious
or sa.crej uses ~~tbin the potentié..l irn;act
ê-re2..? X
-
21. M.:..n.è..ato:-?, ?b~'ngs of Si£;TIificance.
2... !X>es t':::¡e project h?ve the potentiê-l to òebrade
~je q~lity of the eD\iror~ent, ~~~s~aD~ially
,re~uce the r¿bitat of a fish Dr ~~ldlife
sper:..ies, C2.use a fish or ~~ldlife popula~ion
to cirop "œlo-;:;: self sl"sta..iniDg levels, t'::lrea tC:J
to elir.D.i12.te a plê.L~ 0:' ani.m2..1 cœrnUj,"1i ty , re-
òuce the nu;JDer or restrict the ra..nge of a raYe
Dr end2ngerej plaLt or an~l Dr el~iuate
. .
-
Yes Maybe No
- -
im¡x>rtant examples of the major pericxis of
California history or prehistor)~ - ~
b. IX>es the project have the ¡x>tential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on
the environment is one ~nicb occurs in a rela-
tively brief, definitive period of time ~nile
long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.) - L
c. Does the project have impacts ~TIicb are
individually limited, but cumulatively con-
siderable? (A project may impact on tw::> or
... - more separate resources ~~ere the impact on
". each resource is relatively small, ~t ~nere
, '. . the effect of the total of those impacts on
: the environment is significant.) L
-
d. . IbeS the project have environmental effects
.-'-'" ,. - ." ,..'
:-:,-..-...-;-.:~..-'-"--"':'- 'whicb will' cause substantial adverse' effec~s" . .
,.'. on bUŒaD beings,' either directly or indirectly? L
-
III. Discussion "of Enviro~nt2..1 Eva 1 æ.tion
'(Narrative description of enviro~uental impacts.)
: IV.. Determiœtion
(To be c.crn~lete:i by tbe Lea.d Agency.)
On the besis of this initial evaluztion:
I find t~t the propose::3 project ecoLD NOT ~ve a significant effect
on the e:.viron.oent, and a 1\~!-.TIVE DB:L.~.?J..TIO~ >;'ill be preparro. KXI
~
I find that although the propose::3 project coulà have a significant
effect on the e!lviro~~~t, there h'ill Dot be a significant effect in
this C2.Se b:::-:2..use the roitigatio::l De2.-S\.ll"eS descrire::3 0:1 an attacbej
sheet ~ve'œe!l 2.Ó.àed. to the projec-c. A l'\""EJATIVE DEX:L.t;..Qj"TIŒ iííí ,r J BE
P F.EP APED. 0
,0'
I find the p:-oposed pNject MÞ.Y have a significa.:.'1t effect on the
enviroD..'71e::lt, 2...Dd 2...D :E:::r\7I?DN1ÐITAL IMPACT p~?T is requirro. 0
'Y1fr7J - ¡; I 1721 r£;¿f ) 6/~~
. Da"te / I
.... for CdiL b
- ,. ., Pùblic ~nCi s ~e free to àevise their
.:.,-:~,- (Note: To.is is only 2.. suggested form.
~.,~~-., O'IW. fo:-;nat "'0"'" .;,..,.;..; ~ 1 s""udies )
". .I.J.. ~ -~J..,"...c.."" .
...... "':..' "'.' .
. .
Environmental Checklist Response:
1. Earth
b,c,e
The project proposes to grade for road improvements required
on the Tentative Parcel Map. This will result in the
compaction and disruption of soils, a change in topography
and increased water erosion of soils.
Impacts associated with the road improvement grading is not
considered significant.
2. Water
b,f
b. Changes in the absorption rate may occur, but this will
be addressed with an adequate drainage and irrigation
system to the satisfaction of the building department.
f. Due to the grading proposed the existing drainage on the
lot will be altered, however, adequate drainage and
irrigation systems will be required to be approved by
the building department.
4. Plant Life
a,c
a & c. Since grading for road improvements may
necessitate the removal of some of the existing mature
trees, replacement planting should be required if the
existing dense vegetation is considered to be an
important environmental assest to the property.
6. Noise
a
a. There will be increases in existing noise levels
associated with the single family development that will
eventually occur. This increase lS not considered to
be a significant negative impact since the surrounding
properties are developed in single family dwelling
units.
7. Light and glare.
The proj ect will produce additional light and glare
associated with the proposed single family residential
development that will eventually occur. This lS not
considered to be a significant negative impact since
the surrounding properties are developed In single
family dwelling units.
LN/ln/CAB7-359
. .
CITY OF ENCINITAS NEGATIVE DECLARATION
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
FOUR LOTS
87-108-EIA
R.E. Anderson
Findinqs:
The city of Encinitas has examined the Initial study and finds
that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on
the environment and that a negative declaration be prepared
pursuant to the City procedures.
proiect Description and Location:
The project is a Tentative Parcel Map for the subdivision of one
lot into four parcels of for the purpose of future
construction of four single family dwelling units in the RR-.5
zone (density of 2 dwelling units per acre).
Grading for the dwelling is not proposed at this time since the
lots will be for sale individually. The only grading proposed
will be that required for the grading for road improvements
required as conditions on the Tentative Parcel Map. The project
is located on Rancho Santa Fe Road between Olive Crest Drive and
Santa Catalina Drive.
Environmental settinq:
The project site presently has a considerable number of horse
stalls, barns and sheds. The site has been developed in this
state for a considerable number of years and there is no natural
vegetation or topography remaining.
The present vegetation consists of at least 100 mature eucalyptus
and other trees fronting on Rancho Santa Fe Road in addition to
low grasses and shrubs.
Potentiallv Wnificant Effects:
The project impacts are associated with grading of the roads and
the standard light and noise generated by single family dwelling
units. No mitigating measures other than standard requirements
for the grading of the roadways to be performed In accordance
with the San Diego County Grading Ordinance are recommended.
Reasons to Support findinq of Neqative Declaration:
Research and review has failed to disclose any environmental
issues not addressed by the design of the project and the
standard requirements for road improvements.
LN/ln/CAB7-359
. .
Approved by the Department of Community Development on November
6, 1987.
Additional copies of this Negative Declaration may be obtained at
the Community Development Department, City of Encinitas, 527
Encinitas Boulevard, Encinitas, CA 92024.
".,
LN/ln/CAB7-359
. .
IV. DETERMINATION:
The proposed proj ect could not have a significant
effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration will
be prepared.
~.I P-e4 9) / ~ Y/
Date I
~;d) 60 ~
S1.g ture
LN/ln/CAB7-359
"'.. I ~ T
~ . ~. ß p,Í/ <^ .
-- . . . C;{)¡. ~OJ -1! .
((' v ' - . t~ I
" ') RESOLUTION NO.O-S7-019 {>. 0" '
..,.. ;,' . A/~ESOLUTION OF OLIVEN1tAIN COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD -
i
APPROVING A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (S7-10S-TPM)
FOR PROPERTY OF PORTIONS OF LOTS Sl AND alA,
(AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED HERETO)
COLONY OF OLIVENHAIN, MAP 326, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
I
1
; WHEREAS, R.E. Anderson submitted a Tentative Parcel Map
1
I application for the purpose of subdividing one lot into four lots
.
. of .57, .65, .80, and .73 respectively, as required by the city
.
~
of Encinitas subdivision Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the Olivenhain
community Advisory Board on December 8, 1987 as required by law,
and all persons desiring to be heard were heard.
NOH THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Olivenhain Community
Advisory Board of the city of Encinitas, that the proposed
;
--. Tentative Parcel Map for a portion of Lots 81.and 81A, Colony of
(
Olivenhain, Map 326, County of San Diego (further described in
Exhibit A attached) is hereby approved, and that approval is
based upon the following findings:
a. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans as specified in section
65451 of the Subdivision Map Act.
b. That the design or improvement of the proposed
subdivision is consistent with applicable general and
specific plans.
c. That the site is physically suitable for that type of
development, in that the four parcels are proposed to
be developed In single family dwelling units which is ......
consistent with the RR-2 zoning designation and
development standards for the site.
d. That the site lS physically suitable for the proposed
: density of development.
,'-.
\
I
I LN/hz/CAß3-C28
'. . tÞ tÞ
'-~
.
,
e. That the design of the subdivision and the proposed
improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, and a
Negative Declaration is hereby certified for the
Tentative Parcel Map on this date, December 8,_1987.
f. That the design of the subdivision or type of
improvements is not likely to cause serious public
health problems.
g. That the design of the subdivision or the type of
. improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired
by the public at large, for access through or use of,
property within the proposed subdivision.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Tentative Parcel Map 87-
108-TPM and the 'associated Negative Declaration of Environmental
Impact are hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH BEFORE A PARCEL
MAP IS APPROVED BY THE OLIVENHAIN COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD AND
(K. FILED WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY.
': THE PARCEL MAP SHALL SHOW AN ACCURATE AND DETAILED VICINITY MAP,
INCLUDING DISTANCES.
1. ROAD DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENT PLANS (DPW)
~ Any offer of dedication or grant of right-of-way shall
~~ be free of all encumbrances or subordinated at the time
of recordation of the parcel map.
2. COUNTY SERVICE AREA/ROAD MAINTENANCE/COVENANTS/DEVELOPMENT
_FEES ( DPW)
, '5\\..0 .'
f-O"" '.I.~f"
Ú'~~~...It¡:'~' 1'A. The property owners shall enter into a road maintenance
":,.')r-"" :....~ agreement for the purpose of maintenance of the private
~~ Y road easements.
3. FACILITY/UTILITY ARRANGEMENTS (DPW)
A. The subdivider shall comply with section 66436 of the
Government Code by furnishing to the City Department of
. \ i- ." Public Works a certification from each public utility
f\', : ' ,'and each public entity owning ei:lsements within the
" .0 proposed subdiv is ion sta ting tl1a t: (a) they have
,- " received from the subdivider a copy of the proposed
<' (\ final mi:lp; (b) they obj ect or do not obj ect to the
,\ f 11 ing of the mùp wi thout their s igni1 tl1re.
LI!/hz/Cl\DJ-C2f1
'. . . 8-.
. '
/ B. Plans and specifications for the installation' of a
J " sewer system serving each lot must be approved by the
:
~ Director of the Department of Public Works. The
'...
subdivider shall dedicate all necessary easements for
that portion of the sewer system which is to be public
sewer.
I C. The subdivider shall cause all of the land within this
I ! subdivision to be annexed to the Cardiff Sanitation
, .<1 I
I --- - District.
I ,;:) «
I \.If' _\.
-)
\.)- -'~. D. A commitment to serve each parcel must be obtained
c -~-.,¡:-
,\ .- from the Cardiff Sanitation District.
~ ~ '"
-.r
1 E. No sewer commitment shall be issued until all'
conditions in this Resolution of Approval have been
satisfied, the final map or parcel map, grading plan
and improvement plan has been approved by the
Department of Public Works and all fees and deposits
paid and improvement security posted.
THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE COMPLETED, OR A SECURED
AGREEMENT EXECUTED, PRIOR TO RECORDING A PARCEL MAP. THE
AGREEMENT REQUIRES POSTING SECURITY IN FORM OF A CASH DEPOSIT,
IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT OR AN INSTRUMENT OF CREDIT. VALUED
AT, OR MORE THAN THE ESTIMATE IMPROVEMENT COST. IT ALSO REQUIRES
--. IMPROVEMENTS BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 MONTHS OF RECORDING THE
.'
I. PARCEL MAP, AND PRIOR TO GRANTING OF ANY APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT
\
OF ANY PARCEL CREATED BY THIS MAP, EXCEPT BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED
PERMITS CAN BE ISSUED REQUIRING COMPLETION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING.
4. PUBLIC ROAD AND PRIVATE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
( A. Improvement of Rancho Santa Fe Road in accordance with
\, the City of Encinitas public road standards" to a one-
-..'0 half width of thirty foot (30 I) wide, pavement width to
r. '\
l"<. J, .be 20' and graded width to be 10', plus the right to
-'. '
"':: . ,oL'/ construct and maintain slopes and drainage improvements
c, ,J.-"\, ~
<.;; \ as required beyond the thirty foot (30') limit.
B. Improvement of the two private access roads to a 20
'\ foot paved width and a 24 foot graded width, in
accordance with the city of Encinitas private road
E;tandards.
C. All new and existing utility distribution facilities,
including cable television lines, shall be placed
underground. All utility installations shall be
completed before surfacing the streets and installing
concrete curb, gutter~ and sidewalks.
',.-
I D. Portland cement concrete cross gutters shall be
constructed where water crosses the roadways.
LN/h::jCl\ßJ-C2ß
. . . 8,
.
. E. The exact depth of improved base material shall be used
.
t' ", on soil tests approved by the Director, Department of
Public Works.
F. Plans for public road improvements shall be prepared by
a registered civil engineer and submitted to the
Director, Public Works. The following items shall also
apply:
1. street alignment and grade, including the change
of any existing or proposed street alignment and
grade, shall be as required by the Director,
Department of Public Works.
2. Sight distance at all intersections shall conform
to the intersectional sight distance criteria as
provided by the American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials in the
publication "Geometric Design of Highways and
streets -- 198411 or its latest revision.
3. Plans and specifications for the improvement of
all streets, right-of-way, drainage easements and
all culverts, drainage channels and all private
easements shall meet with the approval of the
.--, Director, Department of Public Works.
~
THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE COMPLETED OR A SEC~RED
AGREEMENT EXECUTED, PRIOR TO RECORDING A PARCEL MAP. THE
AGREEMENT REQUIRES POSTING OF SECURITY IN FORM OF A CASH DEPOSIT,
IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT OR AN INSTRUMENT OF CREDIT VALUED,
AT, OR MORE THAN THE ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COST. IT ALSO
REQUIRES IMPROVEMENTS BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 MONTHS FROM THE DATE
OF RECORDING THE PARCEL MAP OR PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT
OR OTHER GRANT OF APPROVAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PARCEL
CREATED BY THIS MAP, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
5. FLOODING/DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (DPí'n
.
A. The subdivider shall pay those flood/drainage fees as
C,'" , adopted by the city of Encinitas City Council.
-:.1,'"
6. FACILITY/UTILITY IMPROVEMENT
¡<,I.,;, A The subdivider shall install the sewer system and
.. :' <,"0' \. , .
. '1 dedicate the portion of the sewer system which is to be
. pi'
.,' public sewer as, shown on the approved plans and
specifications.
.."
Ll1/hz/CAD]-C28
..
. . .
RESOLUTION NO. 89-09
RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
MARTY MONTGOMERY ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has received a request from
Marty Montgomery that the hereinafter described territory to be
annexed to the Cardiff Sanitation District (hereinafter referred
to as the Sanitation District); and
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to initiate
proceedings to annex said territory to the Sanitation District;
BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED as follows:
1. Pursuant to Government Code sections 56800 and 56700,
application is hereby made to the Local Agency Formation
Commission of the County of San Diego for a proposed
change of organization as follows:
A. This proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox
Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 (S.
56000, et. seq., Govt. Code).
B. The nature of the proposed change of organization
and the names of all districts for which any such
change of organization is proposed as follows: The
annexation of the hereinafter described territory
to the Sanitation District.
C. The names of all other affected counties, cities and
districts are: City of Encinitas.
D. A description of the exterior boundaries of the
territory proposed to be annexed to the Sanitation
District is described in Exhibit "A" hereto
attached.
E. Said territory is uninhabited and comprises
approximately 3.11 acres.
F. It is proposed that said territory be annexed
subject to the following condition: Payment of
district annexation and State Board fees.
TH/O4/CRO4-270WP5 (4-3-89)
. .
G. All the owners of land within such territory have
given their written consent to such annexation
subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions.
H. The reasons for this proposal are as follows:
( 1) The Sanitation District is empowered to and is
engaged in furnishing sewage disposal
facilities.
(2) The territory proposed to be annexed to said
District is developed and/or proposed to be
developed and used for residential and/or
commercial purposes and provision for sewerage
disposal facilities for said territory is
essential for such purposes.
I. It is hereby requested that proceedings be taken for
the annexation of territory as hereinabove proposed.
J. This annexation is consistent with the sphere of
influence of the Sanitation District.
2. Pursuant to state CEQA Guidelines section 15303
(California Environmental Quality Act of 1970), the Board
finds that this annexation is not subject to the
environmental impact evaluation process because it is
categorically exempt.
3. The Clerk of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized
and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution
with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission of the County of San Diego.
TH/04/CRO4-270WP5 (4-3-89)
. .
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of April, 1989, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Gaines, Hano, Omsted, Shea, Slater
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
~ ~
P mela Slater, Chairman of the Board
Cardiff Sanitation District
E. of the Board
TH/04/CRO4-270WP5 (4-3-89)
I
. LEGAt!Þ DESCRIPTIOtf . -
87-108-TPM CI1'Y OF ENCf'NITAS
APN 164-142-01
. -
That portion of Lots 81 and 81-A, in THE COLONY OF OLI~ENHAIN, in the .
County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 326, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July
8, 1885, and that portion of "A" Street adjoining the Westerly line Lot 81
and that portion of "BII Street lying between Lots 81 and 81-A, (said
streets being vacated and closed to public use) lying Southwesterly of the
center line of the County Road described in Deed to the County of San
Diego, recorded October 29, 1938 in Book 1817, Page 326 of Deeds and known
as Rancho Santa Fe Road.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Southerly 150.00 feet of the Westerly 137.89 feet
of Block 81, of THE COLONY OF OLIVENHAIN, in the County of San Diego,
State of California, according to Map thereof No. 326, filed in the Office
of the County Recorder of San Diego County, July 8, 1885, together with
that portion of "A" Street lying Southerly of the Westerly prolongation of
the Northerly line of the Southerly 150.00 feet of said Block, said street
being vacated and closed to public use.
I
. . . -
VIClNlIY MAP
87-108-TPM CITY OF ENCINITAS APN 164-142-01
.,
.'
.....
1..3 "[.H . tJ)
~
':. I
.
.
~
..
I
. . '.
SITE PLAN
87-108-TPM CITY OF ENCINITAS APN '2.64-142-01
"
---
- - -
"
......
.... '-
~ "
-
,, '-
"
'\ ...... "
\ "
...... ...... "
--- .... \
'\ " I
" TorAL ACR£ASE I
. I I
I
\ '\,~
\
\
\ \
\ "
\ \ \
'--
\ \
"-
\ " J
\ " ~ /7S./""
.... "
'- "
...... '
'- ---
--- ,/
---
,, - ,/
"- --- - -
- - '- .....
.... ....... ....... '-
....... ...... ......
1:3 s;'I: ~ - - - -
'-
1//':& -
I
I
/
\ JIorse ,,1K:rI!, bar/7~, ( I ~rn.f.s) - -
-----
. Iropoxo' /OI'1/(/e , ~ ~e '-
---
- -
p,rivafe .se~ NðteB - -
~ rQ.5ern~nf,/ .
I _I
'" 1; I
II¡ , . I -
1\1 \¡ ~rcel 2 I ~ fbrce / 3
~ t).~9r Ac Gross ~ tJ.ßtJ:I Ad G. .......
t). hÇ~Ac Neil I\J ,\¿:1o80iAc No! ~
I \ 10 - --
~ I '........; .,~
I
/ \,~
/
t!9S'~ - - - l'
\f'ropo.Jed ¡!4'~ ,or/va 'Ie / f'ôOd- - ..... ~J';.J
and (¡ !¡'lily eo.semenl 7 .....
-
\ 'IJo'~ I -'-
--- - -
------= - v
- ---- -
, " '
. . Local Agency Formation .mission . Date 96-C.-'Z-Z. '4ff
1600 Pacific Highway, R 451
, San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: (619) 531-5400
." ,.,. .. ,.,,- . --- _u. ...........-----...- _. ,--......-
- ---'--_U ... CHANGE OF ORGANIZA TION/REORGANIZA TI0N APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE
1. This questionnaire may be used for the following changes of government organization: eity and
special district an nexa tions and detachments, or a combination thereof, rd erred to as :l
reorganiza tion. " .,...- -, .. - .
. -"'. -
A ge:ncv Change: of Orzaniz:ltion
c. A ~ <:;), 'Ff- 6A-N'ìrrì'o~ 1;:>\E:.ìR\c, b\SìR.lC¡- It;.) ¡J i:: X A"i'Io,J .i)IF
í?M 1:1.<g'7-ID~
A. The following items must be submitted with this application:-
1. A certified resolution OR a petition of landowners/registered voters making appli-
catIon.
a. If initiated by resolution, submit property owner conse:!t form.
2. 1 copy of a metes-and-bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject area.
3. A reproducible plat map and 10 prints.
4. 2 copies of a vicinity map of the subject territory.
. 5. Environmental documents:
a. Negativè Declaration: If an ND has been prepared for this project, submit 1
copy of the ND, Initial Study, and resolution certifying the ND.
...
b. Environmental Impact Report: If an EIR has been prepared for this project,
submit 15 copies of the certified EIR. Only 1 copy of the EIR appendix is
requIred. Also submit a copy of the resolution certifying the EIR.
c. If no environmental review has been conducted, submit a completed Initiai
Study form.
6. If the proposal includes annexation to a c-.Ïty, submit I copy of the city resolution
approving the: prezoning and general plan land use designations for the subject
territory. ' .
7. LAFCO processing fee (refer to fee schedule).
B. Additional information pcrtaining to thc f::..ctors LAFCO must consider may be requested
during LAFCO st:ltTs rev iew of the proposal.
(7/07/37)
I
" ,"
" This application must be completed In consultation with city or district start and sl¡:ned off by
that contact person. All questions must be answered (use N/ A If not applicable).
-,.---.-.. ..... ... ", .. -.,. .. . .... " " ...,
II. DESCRTPTTON AND JUSTIFICATION
A. DEVELOPMENT PLA NS
.. _. Is ih~ subject t~rritory to be d~vc:lop~d at this time?
1.
YrS~
2. If yes, g~nerally describe the anticipated development (buildin!; types, facilities,
numb~r of units). +
S¿IV~1-'6.. ~H I £- ~ ~w~UJ HGp 01J IS \;'1 ~ÞI";4. un- S .
Please indicate below ill discretionary permits or approvals from a city or the County which
will be needed to compl~te the project and the projected approval date. If already granted,
please indicate the date of approval and submit copy of resolution .of approval.
Is Resolution
Project Date of of Approval
Aooroval File No. Aooroval Attached?
..... .. _. ....
City or County Plan Amendment
Prezoning (City)
Rezone (County)
Tentative Subdivision Map
Tentative Parcel Map S7~'~ 12./! /117 '(6~
.. Major Use Permit
. Other
3. If no development is planned at this time, will approval of the proposed jurisdic-
tional change increasè the development potential of the property?
.....,-_.....", (If so, please indic:lte in terms of allowable uses, and number of units.)
...-"" - ..~---------
----------'
4. If development is not planned Jt this time, when is development of the ar:a :It::ici..
pated? "
-
~. 2
'.. : -" -.' . 0" .. 0 ,,' 0 ,.. '.. ..,. "..... ~" ...,~.:~ :"','.," "",",' ,..1
I In ns mUCh.nil ns possible, pknse explain Wh~hiS proposal is necessary nt !his.
* 5.
time (c. g.. an approved development or an existing structure requires service not
currently provided or avaibb1c),
0,., 'Dhc., fi/ 14'57 A ~vt11- 0":' A- + LOf' ìJÇ;.,u)tFì ( I.h6 P.4ä6 L t-Ill P
IN ft.;' ¡..at b t O;J 51i--\ 'i) ~þoÇ>ßJ2ì'1'. D6.\.o'It-LO?Nlf.,iJf o¡:.. "'61 t';) ~f¥K-r- y FO¡(
Glf-./(,.L.E. f-t'H-I I L 'C þw to LLI þ.<~S W.\l..-L 1~.çQ.ù,~ ~.eVJc! t-JûT t:..r.J R R 'h¡Jt L. '(' F'~¡)v MJ)
t?ì: A :SbWl.A. 'ùlóìYttc..T, 1i-f-6. CCt't' 0"" 6tJOfJr'rlf-S t)c~ $ ¡JoT L-()C:)LL ¡,e",-UO;<J1.8L'r
Of\) 56.Pìlc.. 5 &Il.. \J¡c. If. h,S A P"""'V-"G~ l't-l-ì~lIl.fJf'rì/vE.
B. GENERA L rNFORMA TTON
* 1. Please describe the general location and physical features of the territory which is
the subject of this proposaL Refer to major highways, roads, watercour;>es, and
topographical features.
T~t:. ?~\J~?\"< 15 wLA"tp.~ of-.) I. R£,(..tTTtU6L-\.( F-L-/'I1 PI'\-1;2.cE,L-
B~\J ~Þ$o!:¡ B'( ~,.;œo 6t+t--'tf\- ¡:::.€:... iV' Á- s:> 1"<> Ì1iE. ~<*."r-~ØA~ì, I<:.v~ g6SIPII5,Ii<é,S
-,..0.. '1'14~ ~::tí J ~ "ì~ p-I...W OL. \)bÑB"'f~ 1-1- I u...s p b.s \ ÞbNïll4-L Þ6 vISU'!¥1~,vf TO
"n\--E, 8øv-~. H~'ttJ~ ,.~~ t.-¡~'6 )-¡.¡.~ f'Jr;~ ~Mr t---It-Ji::. A'LDfo-!&, RJ4..V{¡.¡.o ~¡4N"t,4
f'c.. R~. A I-AQ.r..é. '~,,",6A.. ~ RvIJ6 1\-""'o~"(.. "tlflS ~¡<.Iìl~ Sou1"tiði(.L.'( l..11-'~ ,,;::. "TfU:;
i"fto ~ r( I 6'.0() F=G..'ï p~o,..., "riflE. p.a..o~1&,Q't'1'.
* 2- How many acres of territory are included in this proposal? 2.7S x
* 3. How many people live within the subject territory? 0 x.
* 4. How many registered voters live within the subject territory? () X.
.
C. LAND USE INFORMATION
For County general plan and zoning information call 565-5981. If subject area is within
a city, call that city's planning department.,
." * .
L County .
-- ----
-, . -
a. Is the territory within a county community planning area? X':,
If so, which one? --~~ . -- ----
b. What is the County General Plan or. community planning area designation?
. x.
c. Wh~t is the existing County zoning? x,
* 2. City
-
a. Is the territory within a city general pbn area? ý,,-~
If so, which city? E ¡.)c..1 r.J Ill-\-S
b. What is the: city's land-use designation? R..1l"-.<;'\~'tIAL 2..
c. I'L1S any city zoned or pre::oned the tcrrirory? 'í'1f:,
If so. which city? c5....'< I ¡"!\1'14<:,
d, flow is [he (crrirory zoned lJr prczoncd? \ZQ-~ ( 'I, Ao('- 1"'1J
J
. ("...."""'... " ";"""":"""",:'\":'-:-' '~""'~'~~I"\"""'.' " ' ,' ,," .,.':y. "', ".,<, ""'4":'",~~",,~.,~¡r"-:<¡~"'r
,".,',,' . " , . ',' '. '.
-It J. How is ( territory presently used (c.g.. vaca grove::; 3 single-family residences.
,etc)? Please be specific as to structures, improvement:¡, facilities now on property.
. .. . .. t--I-OR-Se.. ~~~ I 1314~/06 A~c ç:t.\ 'i:)IA.ltA. Ilt-';~
¡
¡ * 4. How are adjacent lands usc:4?
'
\ North: R6-~ \ Þ~i'.rrl/"L. .
I East: R.6o.& t b6¡V'r1~L
Sou th: ~'Þ..,J\IAL.
West: ~~ I 't>~tù'rl M..
* 5. Does any portion of the subject territory contain any of the following:
Agricultural Land Uses Flood Control Channel
Agricultural Preserve River or Creek
Scenic corridor zone 100-year flood line
Open Space Easement Coastal bl uff
Airport noise contour A rchaeo I og icaljbistor Ïc:ll
Coastal permit zone features
Sewer Moratorium area Other unusual features
Slopes greater than 25% (specify)
Mature Trees )(
¥
III. PUBLIC SER VICES INVENTORY
A. SEWAGE DISPOSAL
L Public Sewer System
-
a. Is the subject territory within a district or èity that provides public sewer
service? No . If so, what agency? N/A
- ..-.. ,-. b. Is annexation for sewer service necessary? Yes
- ..- (If No, skip to Question # 2 (Septic System». If yes, what district or city?
*
..'u--,- _..
-,- ,--- What is the distance for connection to the agency(ies) existing sewer system?
* c.
-.. '.
d. Has the affected agency issued a letter of sewer availability? N/A
If yes, provide a copy of the letter with your application.
e. Will the agency be prepared to furnish service immediatdy? If not, explain.
Yes
No
f. Is che ccrricory in a sewer moratorium area?
4
", ., "0' ;,; .-~,... .
II 'r'~ë,:'I7"o'"~""".",,,..
" I
. Is thAjeet territory to be annexed to an tprovcmenr district? No
g.
* h. Specify any improvements (on and off site) that will be necessary to connect
and serve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of the:;e
improvements and m'tthod of financing (e.g., gener:ll property tax, asse:;sment
district, l:lndowna or devcl°l?ç:r fees). c..O,""UÓc.'t"LO /oJ "TO f:.'1-I<;'¡IJ'.(J, 56..w*-.~ H"¡¡.)
£'. '()o ,c,é.s..r ¡C.t<3,<.\ 't"~~ -,oL7tH"-'" lor ~lf.oP6.e.'ì'\' ~t> 5E.2"1U!> "10 1- H-ou.s~ ""'/1..1.-
OIL ~\"'lItfJt..6J> ~'í 'ì~~ 'D'v.6LOf>a!.R,.
1. Capacity of Treatment Facility:
(1) What is the physical design capacity of the sewage treatment plant which
will serve the annexation area? MGD.
(2) What is the current :lverage daily sewage treatment volume of wastewater
being treated at the plant? l/Ate/E 5" MGD.
(3) Docs the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity to service the
terri tory? Yes . If not, what plan does the agency have to
increase its capacity?
J. Capacity of Transmission Lines:
(1) What is the physical design capacity of the affected seWer main (trans-
mission line or pipeline) which conveys wastewater to. the treJlment
facility? Va ri es MGD. Adequate capacity for thl s proJec .
.... -- -,.. .. '" .-
(2) What is the current loading rate of the sewer main? Varies MGD,
(3) Does the affected agency currently havë.sufficient capacity in its sewer
main to serve the territory? Yes . If not, what plan does the agency
have to increase its capacity?
k. Capacity of Outfall Lines:
(1) What is the physical design. capacity of the affected outfall line which
conveys treated effluent to the ocean or ocean outf:lU system? Vari esMGD.
Adequate capacity for this project.
(2) What is the curr<::nt lo:lding rate of the outfall line? Varies MGD,
(3) Docs the affected agency currently have sufficient capacity in the outfall
line to serve the territory? Yp<:; If not, what pbn docs the
agency have to incre::ise its capacity?
5
I I"""~I:"~"""'~""~'~~" .!\...~. ','" '.. ."" "',' '.. ,p"", :""""""""""""~'~,~~""I"/"""'""," ,~:".",""'1"!"""':-~~,~~.~,.,.,,
. t, ",.' f,'
2. Septic Sys
.. ,3. Is a sePtic system(s) currently used on the property? ~ .
.. b. Wilt septic system be used upon annexation and development of the property?
1->.0 .;
.. c. If 2.b. is answered yes. please :\nswer the following:
( I) Have percolation tests been conducted?
(2) Dept. of Public Hcalth approval?
B. WATER SUPPLY
1. Is the subjcct territory within a district or city that provides water service? v\9)
a. If so, what district or city? OL\v~¡VM,~ MIJ~\L\P '}L- \)./f+'T~e :'JISy¡eICi'.
2. Is annexation for water service necessary? ~~,
a. If so. what district or city? --
3. Is the agency prepared to immediately furnish the necessary service? o.fES
If not, explain.
4. Is water service currently provided to the territory? ilSS
a. If so, what is the current water demand? MGD
..
(1) For what purpose?
'.. YES
5. Will the project be connected to an existing water lin¿?
. a. Distance to tie-in /5,00 ~
b. When will service be extended to territory? 1/1/8q
c. The total anticipated water demand will be:
(1) Residen tial use:: MGD.
(2) Industrial/Commercial use MGD.
,
(3) Agricultur::ll use:: MGD.
6, Is the subject territory to be annexed to an improvement district? ".)0
a. If so, which one(s)? -
7, Specify any improvements (on and off site) th:1t will be necessary to connect and
serve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of these improvements
Jnd method at' financing (e.g" gena:1! property t:1.'<, :1ssessmcnt disHiet, landowner
or devdù¡Jcr fees). IIoVÐ Ace.!:.",'> þa..\U"-5. \-U ILL t""t;, cO;J,,-,.euO 1\ t> t"'KOIY
ì,-,"'-JJ L"¡("¡110~ ðfV RA¡Ù( 4'-' "j~M~ F~ Ri>. )cJ S~I'i:> ¡.c::.tI~ 1'«\""'1"'(. ThIS ~....~'t 1+ or:;
1:'-,4{!.t Ì)\:'\vt" - I ()
\,IV ILL- 13l>< Af>P~)l, 300 .
" -,' " " '~,f\';:,:.
. 8
C. FIR E PROTECT.
1. Is the territory currently within a firc district or city? ~t:: ')
J. If so, which one? ê~c.\~"t~ F-\'R.~ pý;l0ì6c:r [OvJ t>l.ir~:c".
".
2. If not, is anncXJtion for fire protect,ion part of this application? -,-
3. Is structural fire protection necess:lrY? Y65) $" PI2I¡.)"-~"-'::, It-J 140 \JS~.
4. Location of nearest fire station:
J. Estimated response time: (Priority)
(Non-priority)
D. POLICE PROTECTION
1. What police agency currently serves this territory? r:ov"#.J,","" -:5'\\ ßrl..eIlC.F
a. Location of nearest police sta tion? 2, r-ÞvJ/ŒS
b. Estimated response time: ~W7IIV (Priority)
~ ~¿I" (N on-priority)
2. What police agency would serve this territory if this jurisdictional change is
approved? CÐ v ""~'1. -s\46~\F,c:. ( €,,4~ t4-S ~BOVJ$)
a. Location of nearest police station?
b. Estimated response time: 5;¡/1Ý (Prioritv)
.. .
2 0,...,. ,-I (Non-priority)
E. SCHOOLS
1. Will development on the territory generate any school-age children? '(£.S
How many:
a. Grades K - 6 6
b. Grades 7 - 9 3
c. Grades [0 - 12 3
2. Wh:lt school district(s) is the subjcct territory within? 54 tV !:>l8.(-;1,) l'tú u¡.) IOIJ 1-l,Æ¡. t} .
£,-Jc..I'" 1\1'\-6 £,. L61-fj;f-I'TfJ 1:\ '1'
3, Arc any c.::!cmcnrJry or sccond:lrY schools scrvln~; thc su ~ icc! territory opcrat¡nlj
above dc.::~ign capJciry" Ne Ie so, which schtjt)ls?
7
< ! .,' '" ' .' ...,., . .' , "..~",-~ <'~~:,~~;"""r~t:'I.~~:"'.",~":,~,.~",,,,,
'. ,1., . '.
. . .
.
F. FLOOD CONTF ~
I. Describe the m:1jor drainage :1rea within which the subject territory is located:
: II;'
I 2. Are there existing Clood control facilities on thc territory? Y~'?
r If so. describe. Þ>ZAI~A4.t:. f'-At,\ 1..1 T,is, ALOtJ~ :SDù"lI¡-'6I4.Lll-'lS
1 rM'P'GOI/6f.> L.j ¡U~
0=- ç:>p.ÐÇ,,"~,,'-( WILL... CO (V">;1l0\'" \)a.A\t-J~c.{.. of'- \?a..otØ"'~'t"'(.
!
3. If this territory is 3.nnexc:d to a city, has the city planned for improvements ro
provide for flood control in the area (on or off site)? "-' Q.
G. TRANSPORT A TTON
1. Designate the names and types of roads which the project will use for prim:1rY and
secondary access (include direct access streets from the project site to the nearest
freeway):
Street Name TvDe (Right of W'J.v Width) Current level of Service
~AI\JC\-l,O SA1-JìA f=.ß. ~'t>. 60 ,...0&..6:1. SéGO Jt>~~~ CO MMl)'t'è~ eO~J)
2. Is widcning of an existing street necessary? ~C
-..
3. Is the project served by County~maintained roads? Ý'£;b
..-.
4. Is construction of new access streets necessary? Yi&.S ~ .
.
5. What is the distance to the nearest shopping center? ~ miles.
6. Is public transportation available? Y6.S.. How distant? ~ miles.
IV. SPHER E OF INFLUENCE
A. Is the territory to be annexed or reorganized located within the sphere of influence of
the city/district to which it is proposed to be annexed? Vb~
B. Will a spherc: of influc:nce amendment for any affected agency be required? fJo
Which agcncy(ics)?
8
, ." --." -; "
j .
,
~ v, SPECIAL REVENTJF,~NNEX¡t'!G CTIY OR QIFRlc:r !eST ÇOMP¡'ETE THIS SEÇTION
A. Docs the city/district have curr::nt plans to establish any ncw assessment districts which
would include this arca. in ordcr to pay Cor ncw or cxtendetl $crviccs? Please detail.
"',
No
B. Docs thc arrectcd territory contain existing commercial acti v i tics which generate tcn
million dollars pcr ycar or more in retail sales? No
C. Will the area aSSumc any existing bonded indebtedness upon annexation to city/district?
Please explain, and indic:J.tc taxp:J.yer cost.
Any existing bonded bebt becones the liability of the property owner after
annexation.
D. Will the territory be subject to any new or additional special taxes, benefit charges, or
f ces? Ple:J.se outline.
Annual sewer service charge after connection to the public sewer system.
E. Which service(s) to be provided to the annexing area by your city/district are presently
being provided by another local agency? (please list each service and current provider).
None
F. Is the city/district requesting an exchange of property tax revenues as the result of this
proposal? No
,"'"
G. Is a master property tax exchange agreement applicable to this jurisdictional change?
No .-
H. If property tax exchange negotiations are necessary, upon receipt of this application all
affected agencies will be notified of this proposal and provided preliminary inform:ltion to
begin the negotiation process.
,..,-
~ ~ f/~~
City/District Represenc:J.cive Ijtle
(sign:J.cure) qL/ -S-D7~
Phone Number
9
, ~ :',.. ' " ". ". , "'"",," ". ""'."""""',"" ".""' ":~"'i.r,~"~'~~"'I/~~I!¡~::
'.
VI. punuc CONT 1:
A. List, all a8cnc:ic3, groups, and individuals contacted regarding thi3 proposal. . .,.
None
II.
* LAFCO will consider the pcrson signing this application below as the proponent of the proposed
action(s). . Notice and othcr communications regarding this application (including fee payment) will
be directed to the proponent.
t111 '^i ~ 7- Þ)
Signature:
Date: /7--/7..1... /.:;'9
.
Print or Type
Name: ¡VIA-I<'1'""'( HelVì~OM~"2'1'
Represen ting: ~Ð~6~ì Afo.J~lþf:.o(Ù
Address: C)t L v'1 ¡+ b(. t...¡4-, v/4 u...£ '" 100
<$O/...4¡V1'\- 'ß.~l'\c\4., (" J4 . qz.O7~
.
Phone No. ('-1<:1) 7Q-¿'- b/oO
* If you wish anyone other than the proponent of this application to receive notices and reports of
these proceedi?gs. please include here: .
.
Name:
. - 0,' - .. ..- -- -0' - - ... .... , ..
Address:
.,
(7/07/87)
10
Date: ~?c, .1.2-... .
Name H4fZ.,""t \..co¡u,- t--I~«~
Address (,.:t,o "'rlr'-b(I!~"H~ . rl'1"'l\q,¡\;)
As the proponent (s) for this annexation of property identified
as 264-J+2 -01 to the CJ' ~1)I;::F .9}-tVn-/'t'¡JoJU
Assessor's Parcel Number(s)
District, I understand and agree that annexing into the District does
not guarantee sewer service or commit sewer capacity to the subj ect
property being annexed. Also, the District by accepting the application
does not represent that it will provide any treatment plant expansions
or sewer line extension to provide capacity or ser/ice for the subject
area to be annexed. Acceptance of this application and final annexation
of the property only allows the property to be served at such time as
the owner(s) of the annexed property pay all necessary costs for the
sewerage facilities which can transport, treat and dispose of the
wastewater generated by the property. This may mean the proponent(s)
shall pay for a part or all of the required facilities to serve the
property.
. ,/U ~ IAA ~~<-~
L//'/~ - JI'~ ..
Signature of, nexat'^n A2 'cant
BO/O4/MSJ-217wp5 (1-17-89-J)
TO: Board of Direct4IÞ 4IÞ
LA ~ ~ ~¡::F- <)""4,u\"t-.4'"tl.O,J District
The undersigned property owners in the vicinity of OL.J L/¡zO,vI-lAI^-l
respectfully request and consent to the commencement of proceeding for
the annexation of the property described opposite our names to the
-
C"tT<.b1 ~~ .5A-,v \ 'ìA- '¡-tt>,u District and further consent to this
annexation subject to any and all regulations, fees, and/or charges
established under the provisions of existing C14I2~If:.F- 5AAJ ) 'ì1'1-' /OAJ
District ordinances.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED
State Lot, Block, Subdivision's name
Please Sign and Map No. or Section, Township and ASSESSOR'S
DATE NAME AND ADDRESS Ranqe or Address 0 f Propertv PARCEL NO.
~
iz/n/f 9 ó-Z IZ-Ar-.:Jc\.10 sA1Vì;4 F-£. It';:>,} Dt-;'-'4..vHI'II'v,c.A.
~~I~ Tt+I't-T i?oR.Ì'I~1U ~ 1...r'I.,. {It AD!) 1f'1-4 IN "t-1-I\5 rOL..ON'< of 1!)I....IVI!5.J,)J.!JII,JI-- ,J,) 'r/il; cou,..r'("
. ,
Ð~ SAN t¡1f."~ .i"t7<l'TL Of'- £Æ4~ UlA- J J'l.G'C\Ilt>I,",~ 't-b HAP T¡.¡"ç,Q¡6.0l"- ¡.)o. 1.'26 J ~lt..60 ,A) "TU~ Ð,c.,c.I(~ ",c. rnrc
r:W~~rDQ.bl6rl ¡I'J,<- s..4A.~us.G.o rÐtJ.AJ'I-'-!¡ ~L.«9, i!'~S, A,u~ 't-H¡4,r i""'~t-!o,.) o C. ~"'n....~¡:;- Ab'tO'AI/W, """'(C
-~c, c, .v< L& < I """ 'r"". -""U ,< "Q . <~. ~v,'" ....~~." Lel, "'I ~ ..-1 -1'1 (\A>b >"'""" """':
1I""'~b ~~ c.~6b 'to ." 't U06.
~ r-VIJL.I ( uc".c.) L '< If-.Ñ. ,sOV'HI-1MÞ6 '1-1s.ri L '¡' 9'¡;' ~Ç. (~L/"'~ LQ}¡Ut-'f ~olh b'<:""~'ft~ )
~c.oltt>cSþ OCT'
SIGNATURE: ~ ~~
*If property is in escrow, please note the approximate date of
completion of escrow.
Please return petition to: ~~If/- W~ILJ¡)~:
.-", E.~Ÿ"tI ,/~ ""1foE (1S.1"1í!8"" 'tl/'- ~1"t/'-1'l. 1..'( IS-O.OO ¡CJI-"t 00: 'T¡'¡~
City of Encinitas w""tE:ot L "( 1~7.'f"l C.1S&'t Dt:.. 6LCc.K. "",0'1- "tffr3. (OLD,",,!, ,,1" Ol.IV611J~~.
Department of Public Works 11Ù"'~ CC\J U't~ OF- 5r11ù b'~.c, S'trlo'tlS. OJ'- cAL,1"OI.~ II1, ^COCl?tlIAI~ 't() I-/II~
527 Encinitas Boulevard 't-K4.<t"- (¥. ¡.JO, 32J. , "11.\1!b I~ 't'I'¡.6. O¡;::"l( £ c.c "'1""4 "')V"'~'t~,¡; t: oar/ (
Encinitas, California 92024 tJo'<- b¡f.p btS(¡o COUlU't'1 j\"I..'(~, l'!1'~Ç -roc,,"-'tH"t{ w)¡1'/ "r rtJ\-T f"<)lé!tJ'
Attn: Tom Henie ~ " , J !"I1.CL.O~.tll(),IJ ðf=
CoC A ~ì. '-'¡ '£I'" ,W\Jl'H6",J..~ Dr"- "T'ltl/i uI'6 &'1'~2'L.'1'
PI-... ¡L'~'1'Hi~LY L.IA.-'€, 0": 'rtk. SOV'I 1i6RL.'f /6"0.00 ¡o..:;,,; 0'" ~A-lb
Telephone (619) 944-5079 í3J.OC\I:, .sA \1:) ~11.<S.'ì 13"'./1-(\ VI'ft:tlr¡¡ ) ,.~ CLO~"[) ~ ;>"~L (¡ V,Sf-.
BO/O'~/MS J -~ 17wp:5 (1-17-89-J)
-
. .
CARDIFF SANITATION DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: April 11, 1989
~
T~~/ ~rren H. Shafer, District Manager
FROM: ~ Tom Henie, Utilities Planner
VIA: . Morton F. August, District Engineer n?~fÎ-
~<~~ Robert A. Warren, City Engineer
'í'
DATE: April 4, 1989
SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 89-09, Application for
Annexation to the Cardiff Sanitation District of 3.11
Acres Located on the West Side of Rancho Santa Fe Road
Approximately 650' South of Olive Crest Drive. - Marty
Montgomery
BACKGROUND:
This is a request to annex 3.11 acres into the Cardiff Sanitation
District. Annexation is required in order to provide sewer service
to four future single family dwellings.
DISCUSSION:
Tentative Parcel Map 87-108-TPM divides a 3.11 acre parcel into
four (4) lots of .73, .80, .65 and .57 acres, respectively.
Annexation of the above mentioned property is a condition of final
map approval.
This proposed annexation is in conformance with the Cardiff Board's
policy on annexations for single family dwellings on legally sized
lots, conforms with the current zoning (RR-2) and is within the
District's sphere of influence. The parcel is located on the west
side of Rancho Sante Fe Road approximately 650' south of Olive
Crest Drive (see attached vicinity and plat maps).
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Directors:
1. Find pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15303
(California Environmental Quality Control Act of 1970), that
this project is categorically exempt from evaluation.
2. Adopt resolution of application number 89-09 for annexation
to the district.
TH/04/CABI4-451WP5 (4-4-89-1)
-